Slashdot Mirror


NASA Attempts To Assuage 2012 Fears

eldavojohn writes "The apocalyptic film 2012 has dominated the box office, taking in $65 million on opening weekend. But with all those uninformed eyeballs watching the film, NASA has found itself answering so many common questions that their Ask an Astrobiologist blog offers calming, professional reassurance that there is no planet Nibiru, nor will it collide with Earth (although I do recall a massive solar storm forecast). NASA's main site even offers a FAQ answering similar questions. NPR has more on NASA scientist David Morrison and his efforts to calm the ensuing public hysteria, but survivalists are already planning for the big one. Pretty funny, right? Not according to Morrison: 'I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide. I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves. I had one last week from a person who said, "I'm so scared, my only friend is my little dog. When should I put it to sleep so it won't suffer?" And I don't know how to answer those questions.'"

881 comments

  1. Wow. by Overzeetop · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just, wow.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Wow. by mofag · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think that's what the suicide offers are for - to reduce the number of stupid people. Seems like a naturally self-correcting system to me. I say let it run its course. Next thing we will have 10foot disclaimers on the entrance to cinemas telling the dumb masses that its just pretend.

    2. Re:Wow. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well magical thinking is magical thinking. Makes you wonder how many people think all the shows on TV are documentaries?

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    3. Re:Wow. by Volante3192 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Those poor people on Gilligan's Island...

    4. Re:Wow. by TheRecklessWanderer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You know if people are so stupid that they watch a movie and think that its, really going to happen, to the point that they are going to commit suicide, I say let them. we definitely don't need any more stupid people on this planet.

      --
      Mean what you say...say what you mean.
    5. Re:Wow. by abigor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Does the Cylon attack come before or after 2012?

    6. Re:Wow. by eeth · · Score: 0

      I'm no doomsday prophet, but I will say that when science ignores the unknown variables in any given situation, science becomes a religion. Carl Jung was hardly a crackpot, but believed in the existence of a collective unconscious as well as in synchronicity. Add to this the power of faith / placebo, and it suddenly becomes ignorant to mock nearly any belief.

      --
      "believe in my innocence and I might consider yours." -- charles bukowski "Scientific progress goes 'boink'?" -- Calvin
    7. Re:Wow. by Bught_42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Perhaps they'll issue a mass Darwin Award.

    8. Re:Wow. by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think that's what the suicide offers are for - to reduce the number of stupid people.

      "Ignorant" is not the same as "stupid", and can be cured by means much less dramatic than death.

      The problem is that we don't train people in the fine art of bullshit detection -- mostly because doing so would challenge mainstream religions, not to mention most American's understanding of their nation's history and place in the world. When you've got a culture where many people take ancient Hebrew creation myths as true and are not laughed at, it's no surprise that belief in the imminent destruction of Earth by collision with the rogue planet Nibiru will proliferate.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    9. Re:Wow. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can't disagree, but in the case of the mother who was going to kill herself and her children, I can't help thinking that just being related to someone that stupid shouldn't be a capital offence...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    10. Re:Wow. by Faylone · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes.

    11. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a person who watches movies and think that its really going to happen, you insensitive clod!

      Alt. reply:

      We need to save this people so that they can continue voting!

    12. Re:Wow. by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      Clearly, it depends on who wins the American presidential election.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    13. Re:Wow. by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1, Troll

      stupid people breed stupid people.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    14. Re:Wow. by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      Your sig fits perfectly with this story.

      Yes - there are too many stupid people. The problem is that even smart people have 'stupid moments', which contributes.

      My favorite perspective on this is that if you consider the average IQ - then consider how many extremely smart people you know and know of... well, there's that many extremely dumb people too (on average).

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    15. Re:Wow. by lastchance_000 · · Score: 1

      At least there's a Baloney Detection Kit. If only we could get people to use it...

    16. Re:Wow. by FreeFull · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just tell them there is no mention of Nibiru in the Bible

      --
      No ascii art.
    17. Re:Wow. by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?

      What an appropriate sig!

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    18. Re:Wow. by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      You mean to say that you have never been convinced of something based on what you saw or heard, and later found out it wasn't true?

    19. Re:Wow. by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Dude, that's the perfect sig for that post on this story.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    20. Re:Wow. by CrazedSanity · · Score: 4, Funny

      Okay, let's round up all the people that believe 2012 is in any way related to actual scientific fact, and let them go see The Invention of Lying. If they don't get the coincidence, explain to them it already is 2012 according to the Gregorian calendar...

      --
      Sanity is like a condom: rather have it and not need it, than need it and not have it.
    21. Re:Wow. by Icegryphon · · Score: 1

      No but, Chris Carter called and Said he wants his X-files ending back.
      He also says John Cusack sucks as an Actor.

    22. Re:Wow. by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      Well to be fair, the people talking about suicide might be terrified of Obama getting re-elected in 2012 - not the same "end of the world" as what's in the movie.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    23. Re:Wow. by cthulu_mt · · Score: 1

      most American's understanding of their...place in the world

      At the center of the Food Chain!

      http://fc05.deviantart.net/fs38/f/2008/315/8/c/Simpsons_Food_Chain_by_SpacePlatypus.jpg

      --
      Virginia is for lovers. EVE is for griefers.
    24. Re:Wow. by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 1

      The linked Q&A with the astro-biologist was amusing. It's almost like someone paid him to refute everything with the blanket statement "scientists should be more concerned with global warming and loss of biological diversity."

      It saddens my little heart when we have professional scientists saying we need to do something based on less than 100 years of empirical data. Global warming was a few BILLION years ago in Earth's history. Get the fuck over it.

      --
      "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
    25. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that we don't train people in the fine art of bullshit detection -- mostly because doing so would challenge mainstream religions, not to mention most American's understanding of their nation's history and place in the world.

      And who is going to tell the 'uninformed' what is bullshit?

      Politicians need it to get elected
      TV stations need it to get people to watch tv & sell ad space

      Nobody with the ability to enlighten the public has an interest in doing so.

    26. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "not to mention most American's understanding of how to use apostrophe's."

      FTFY.

    27. Re:Wow. by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      What if she got pregnant by raping Stephen Hawking?

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    28. Re:Wow. by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

      I've always said... ...when we're down to our last breeding pair of idiots, THEN we'll worry about protecting them.

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    29. Re:Wow. by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

      I worked with someone who was duped by this stuff years ago. He was telling all our coworkers that a rogue planet was coming within 5 million miles of Earth and would destroy most of life on the planet, reverse the poles, etc. Some of my more gullible coworkers started asking me if this could be possible. I responded with the following conversation, in comic form:

      Person 1: So I've looked into this "rogue planet" thing and here's what I found...
      Person 2: Ok
      Person 1: Let's say this planet passes within 5 million miles of Earth and is the size of Earth.
      Person 2: Terrifying.
      Person 1: Using a non-theoretical planet, Mars, we can stage a basic equation to find its impact on Earth's gravity, or "Tidal Force"
      Person 2: I think I follow...
      Person 1: This planet, if it were the size of Earth, would be 3.3 times bigger than Mars. That means 3.3. times stronger the force.
      Person 2: Ok.
      Person 1: It would be 6x closer than mars, which makes the Tidal Froce 36x stronger (since gravity is 3-dimensional) so 3.3 x 36 is about 119 times the strength of Mars's influence on Earth. Person 2: So what is Mars's Tidal Force?
      Person 1: Mars has a Tidal Force on Earth of about .000002 So the rogue planet would have a force of about .00024. The moon has a tidal force of 2.1 so that means the rogue planet would have almost 1/8000th the power of the moon on our gravity.
      Person 2: That doesn't sound so bad...
      Just then, the rogue planet swept by, obliterating all life on Earth.

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    30. Re:Wow. by Fortunato_NC · · Score: 1

      Actually, that isn't necessarily true. Look up "regression to the mean" if you don't believe me.

      --
      Blogging Weight Loss, Distance Education, and more at verlin.com
    31. Re:Wow. by n0tWorthy · · Score: 1

      That's the problem with the IQ bell curve, 50% of the population has an IQ less than 100. The natural selection part of it would be great if they weren't such cowards that would they take the lives of innocent children and bystanders.

      --
      "Be kind, for everyone you meet is facing a great battle." - Philo of Alexandria -
    32. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Idiot, everybody knows it's impossible for a woman to be a raper or a man to be raped.

    33. Re:Wow. by Korin43 · · Score: 1

      stupid people breed stupid people.

      Not true. They may influence their children to be stupider, but it's not always the case. Examples that come to mind are some of Fred Phelps' children, and that one girl who ran away from the Amish (can't remember her name).

    34. Re:Wow. by gparent · · Score: 1

      Depends on the ASIMO road map, really...

    35. Re:Wow. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Stupid people raise stupid people.

      Whatever the genetic component of intelligence may be, it is clear that environment and education make a huge difference. These kids would end up a lot smarter simply by being brought up by someone other than their stupid bitch of a mother.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    36. Re:Wow. by Golddess · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If that were 100% true, then children would always share the same religious beliefs as their parents, and I can tell you right now that I certainly do not share my parent's religious beliefs.

      (No I am not going to tell you what my beliefs are or those of my parents, I want to leave this intentionally ambiguous.)

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    37. Re:Wow. by Golddess · · Score: 1

      You mean to say that you have been convinced of something after watching a fictional movie, and later found out it wasn't true? Well.. I admire your ability to admit that.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    38. Re:Wow. by nebaz · · Score: 4, Informative

      Is this close enough?

      "And the third angel sounded, and there fell a great star from heaven, burning as it were a lamp, and it fell upon the third part of the rivers, and upon the fountains of waters; And the name of the star is called Wormwood: and the third part of the waters became wormwood; and many men died of the waters, because they were made bitter." (Revelation 8:10, 11 - KJB).

      --
      Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    39. Re:Wow. by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      Perfect illustration of why the Nigerian 419 scam works so well.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    40. Re:Wow. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Ignorant" is not the same as "stupid", and can be cured by means much less dramatic than death.

      Correct, but I think deciding to kill yourself and your loved ones based on a work of fiction counts as stupid.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    41. Re:Wow. by The+-e**(i*pi) · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I remember from my psychology class that what religion you follow has no heritability, but how religious you are is at least partially heritable.

      Also, Intelligence has a negative correlation between children and parents, at least according to Wikipedia.

    42. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about that. Were they adopted?

    43. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      With an answer like that, you'd think one works at Infinity Ward!

    44. Re:Wow. by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      You mean we're not in The Matrix?

    45. Re:Wow. by Barryke · · Score: 1

      FTA "I'm so scared, my only friend is my little dog. When should I put it to sleep so it won't suffer?"

      This IS funny! Seriously though just let Darwin do his job and dont let humanity degrade even more.

      --
      Hivemind harvest in progress..
    46. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe we should get rid of you and reduce the number of unfeeling morons running around.

    47. Re:Wow. by ThatMegathronDude · · Score: 1

      So in the end times, we die of overdosing on Absinthe? Might be a fun way to go...

    48. Re:Wow. by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Well, let's see. Boxey was portrayed by Noel Hathaway (born 1971), making him 7 years old when Battlestar Galactica hit the airwaves. In Galactica 1980, Troy (a.k.a. Boxey) was portrayed by Kent McCord. He was born in 1942, making him 38 when Galactica 1980 aired. Assuming that the character's age is the same as the actor's age, Troy/Boxey would have been 38 when they reached Earth, and 7 when they Cylon attack on Caprica and the other colonies happened. That attack would have occurred 31 years before 1980, or 1949.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    49. Re:Wow. by ThatMegathronDude · · Score: 1

      Don't tell those suicide bomber guys. I think they might take offense.

    50. Re:Wow. by hoggoth · · Score: 4, Funny

      > "Ignorant" is not the same as "stupid",

      No, I'm pretty sure believing what you see in a movie is stupid.

      Honestly, these people see 'Transformers', 'Superman', 'Batman', 'Star Trek', 'Dogma', 'Godzilla', and '2012'. Then they choose to believe the world is ending but they won't be saved by Superman or Batman. They won't be killed first by giant robots or a giant lizard. And angels and demons... well ok they probably do believe in Dogma.

      Actually these people probably already have a mental problem and fear the world is ending BEFORE seeing 2012. Seeing the movie just gives them an excuse to bring it out.
      Why else would they choose this one as the real one?

      Personally, I choose to believe in 'The Last Starfighter'. I am practicing, Centauri, I'm practicing...

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    51. Re:Wow. by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      stupid people breed stupid people.

      Highly over-simplistic to the point to point of being pretty much just plain wrong. Stupid people frequently raise stupid people, but the brain is a complex organ and one that can be improved with exercise. Especially in the young. You might as well say that weak people breed weak people--there's a tiny amount of truth there, but it's drowned out by the fact that being weak and flabby is mainly caused by bad diet and lack of exercise. Take your typical slashdotter, for example... :)

      And that's just the first and most obvious flaw in your proposition.

      I don't want to get too far off topic, but lets just say that Idiocracy, while an entertaining movie, is evidence that Mike Judge fails biology forever.

    52. Re:Wow. by gedrin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you saying that if we fail to elect Robot-Nixon we'll face nuclear armageddon at the hands of the vengeful decendants of our robotic slaves?

      --
      Moderation : -1 Conservative Viewpoint
    53. Re:Wow. by Abreu · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just tell them there is no mention of Nibiru in the Bible

      I did that, but apparently theres a mention of a "star called wormwood which will fall into the sea"

      [facepalm]

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    54. Re:Wow. by Hybrid-brain · · Score: 0

      Is it just me, or are people getting stupider and it's the younger generations who are getting smarter? People got all afraid of Y2K thinking it would be the end of the civilized world and we'd be back to the stone age, and lo nothing happened. other then it becoming a new year and computers and technology still existing. People take television and movies too seriously. I've known people who've read The Left Behind Series and take it as Gospel. ::rolls Eyes:: So you see it's because we're really a lot more uneducated then we let on. and we force these things on others who take it as gospel, and sooner or later we've got mass stupidity and suicides and other issues because of one Hollywood movie. Yaghoi.

      --
      Five words describe me on a normal day. two words describe me the rest of the time. can you guess?
    55. Re:Wow. by Toonol · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You think the Amish are stupid? I'm not sure there's any justification for that belief.

    56. Re:Wow. by icebike · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Ignorant" is not the same as "stupid", and can be cured by means much less dramatic than death.

      In this case it is exactly the same.

      These reports did not come from some long overlooked rainforest tribe, but rather from people intelligent enough to call NASA with worries and fears. These are people able to read or at least watch TV news, or surf the net.

      Yet they can't distinguish between a movie trailer and real life.

      That, my friend, is not ignorant, but rather, stupid, in bold type, writ large.

      The chance of educating these people is slim to none. The recidivism rate of stupidity is astoundingly high. The success stories few and fleeting.

      No one wants to wake up on December 24th to watch their dim witted neighbor's body being carried from the next apartment due to hysteria induced suicide.

      But by the same token, no one wants to hand-hold these people thru every motion picture release based on a misinterpretation of a calendar developed by people who never invented the wheel and who's year had only 360 days.
         

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    57. Re:Wow. by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Okay, let's round up all the people that believe 2012 is in any way related to actual scientific fact, and let them go see The Invention of Lying. If they don't get the coincidence, explain to them it already is 2012 according to the Gregorian calendar...

      Hey, don't bash that movie!

      Its made by Roland Emmerich, who made other films of "obvious scientific accuracy" like Universal Soldier, Independence Day, Godzilla and The Day after Tomorrow!

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    58. Re:Wow. by Toonol · · Score: 1

      Al Gore, Michael Moore, Ben Stein, etc. Fiction can be presented with a sheen of authenticity and authority that can sway a lot of people.

    59. Re:Wow. by arminw · · Score: 1, Informative

      ...Just tell them there is no mention of Nibiru in the Bible...

      The Bible does however say this about the end times:

      Luke 21:25 "There will be signs in the sun, the moon, and the stars, and there will be distress on earth among the nations that are confused by the roaring of the sea and its waves.
      Luke 21:26 People will faint with fear and apprehension because of the things that are to come on the world, for the powers of heaven will be shaken loose.

      Jesus was asked by his followers what would be the signs of his coming. Those two verses are embedded in the answer he gave them. Anyone interested should read the whole chapter to get the context.

      --
      All theory is gray
    60. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So are you saying that 0% of the population has EXACTLY 100 as their IQ? I've never looked into this, but I would have thought it would be some distribution (made up numbers) like 48% below 100, 4% exactly 100, 48% above 100 - but what do I know...

    61. Re:Wow. by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      When you believe a movie is showing how the future is going to unfold, you're undoubtly stupid. Ignorant people just don't know; stupid people make panicy decisions on something they don't know and don't investigate.

      If people are really seriously considering suicide after seeing 2012, I agree that we should jsut let them. Anyone with that little thinking capacity shouldn't be around.

    62. Re:Wow. by camperdave · · Score: 1

      So tell them not to go on any cruises in 2012.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    63. Re:Wow. by edumacator · · Score: 1

      When I watched Nightmare on Elm's Street, I was convinced I would die if I went to bed.

    64. Re:Wow. by Tellarin · · Score: 1

      Yeah! When we get to ASIMO 5 we're doomed!

    65. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would the children roll out in wheel chairs?

    66. Re:Wow. by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Then they choose to believe the world is ending but they won't be saved by Superman or Batman.

      Indeed, we're apparently falling down on the game with improbable heros, and problems everyone knows some actual person could not defeat.

      'Fairy tales are more than true — not because they tell us dragons exist, but because they tell us dragons can be beaten.' -G. K. Chesterton

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    67. Re:Wow. by PyroMosh · · Score: 5, Funny

      O RLY?
      (not even a little bit work safe)

    68. Re:Wow. by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my only problem with murder/suicides is that they do it in the wrong order.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    69. Re:Wow. by Toonol · · Score: 1

      Carl Jung was hardly a crackpot, but believed in the existence of a collective unconscious as well as in synchronicity

      He was born in 1875. That's modern times; he was educated, he was exposed to rationality, and yet he still believed in that mystic nonsense. Some beliefs are simply and obviously wrong, and it's no sin to mock them. Hell, sometimes it's worth mocking even correct beliefs.

    70. Re:Wow. by jebrew · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bubba from Folsom would like to lodge a disagreement with the second half of your statement...now try asking where he's going to lodge it.

    71. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a bit ironic that we are laughing at people for thinking the world's about to end based on a movie, but at the same time thinking that climate change will kill us all. It's tempting to call this guy and say "I just watched An Inconvenient Truth and WE'RE ALL GOING TO DIE!!!" and see if he can still say "No, you're retarded."

    72. Re:Wow. by dnahelicase · · Score: 4, Informative

      yeah, but to calm any fears of the end times, remind them that Jesus said that they "would come like a thief in the night" (1 Thess 5:2). If anyone is expecting it, that is exactly not the time it is going to happen. If people have predicted that 2012 will be the end for hundreds of years, then I imagine that means it has one of the lowest probabilities of happening - the bible doesn't lie.

    73. Re:Wow. by jebrew · · Score: 1

      I dunno, Fargo seemed totally plausible.

    74. Re:Wow. by icebike · · Score: 1

      Yes, but I was only 5, and it didn't dawn on me for some years that babies were not in fact found under cabbage leaves in the garden.

      When I awoke to find my Dad trying to steal the money the tooth fairy left for me under my pillow I learned I could not trust everything he said no matter how much he protested that he just needed change for a dollar.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    75. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a Cylon you insensitive clod!

    76. Re:Wow. by timeOday · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem is that we don't train people in the fine art of bullshit detection

      99.99% of Christians are not going to fear Nibiru after watching 2012, so it's only fair to distinguish between them and the people Morrison is talking about. You must realize, he is fielding questions from a population of millions of people, some significant percentage of whom are literally psychotic (which actually means losing touch with reality, not being an axe murderer). This "idiocracy" meme (that the masses are stupid and we are the smart ones) is just ego stroking - don't feel good just because you're more sane than the bottom 0.001% who are off their meds.

    77. Re:Wow. by interploy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Ignorant" is not the same as "stupid", and can be cured by means much less dramatic than death.

      While I agree that ignorance != stupid, if a person is getting their "facts" from a hollywood movie, they are not suffering from mere ignorance.

    78. Re:Wow. by Golddess · · Score: 1

      it suddenly becomes ignorant to mock nearly any belief.

      While there are those who mock the actual beliefs of others, I like to think most people's apparent mocking is actually directed towards the pushiness of some people with regard to their beliefs.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    79. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that what teachers are for ? I mean, when they're not teaching creationism ...

    80. Re:Wow. by kurfu · · Score: 1

      We have to build them first.

    81. Re:Wow. by el3mentary · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Apart from Judaism, they consider it inheritable on the mothers side IIRC.

      --
      I reject your reality and substitute my own.
    82. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.

    83. Re:Wow. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, while everyone waits for the world to end on December 21, it will actually end on December 20, and no one will have expected that. :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    84. Re:Wow. by BenoitRen · · Score: 1

      Big stars that fall in our seas usually create tsunamis that ravage the land.

    85. Re:Wow. by kenj0418 · · Score: 1

      (When) does the Cylon attack come

      Based on the latest Maxim cover, not soon enough.

    86. Re:Wow. by Apatharch · · Score: 3, Funny

      But what about the other 0.009%? They're the ones I'm worried about.

    87. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Rest assured that no star will ever fall into the planet.

      Given the mass of any star, it is us who will fall into it.

    88. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but lots of them are waiting with baited breath for the "end times", which is just as nutty. The reason that many of them won't fear 2012 is because it clashes with the vision of the future that they already believe, not because they are good at detecting bullshit.

    89. Re:Wow. by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      First, I didn't admit to anything... :)

      Most people do not go home and automatically "fact check" everything they see. As a subsequent poster stated, Michael Moore and Al Gore have "documentaries" that at the very least have statements and facts proven to be untrue, and plenty of people believe them.

      Besides. People are pretty funny. Sure, it's a fictional movie, but doesn't everyone today say that "everything" has some truth in it, or whatever?

      The point I'm really trying to make is that being ok with people committing suicide over a misunderstanding, no matter how stupid it is, seems really degrading and callous to me. Some people are ignorant. Some people are stupid. But, in my book, all human life has worth, no matter how ignorant or stupid. And if your worldview somewhere states that it's ok for stupid people (or, at least, "really" stupid people - who decides that, by the way? isn't getting a bunch of girls pregnant stupid, too? or beating your wife? or ...) to commit suicide just because they are stupid, then I think that is a worldview that is scarily similar to worldviews of people like Hitler, Stalin, Mao Zedong, etc... who all thought that some people's lives simply aren't worth living or are actually "bad." Usually, I guess, for political reasons. But I see little difference between wanting someone to die for political reasons and wanting (or "being okay" with) someone to die for intellectual reasons...

    90. Re:Wow. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      don't feel good just because you're more sane than the bottom 0.001% who are off their meds.

      Look, I gotta take it where I can get it, alright?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    91. Re:Wow. by mustafap · · Score: 1

      >The problem is that we don't train people in the fine art of bullshit detection

      But it's a movie! It's a fecking movie!

      --
      Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    92. Re:Wow. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      So slashdotters breed slashdotters? Oh wait, slashdotters don't breed ...

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    93. Re:Wow. by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      And I don't know how to answer those questions.'"

      [_] Grow the f*** up!
      [_] Kill yourself now and avoid the rush (and collect your darwin, because morons like you shouldn't be reproducing) !
      [_] Send me your money and I'll tell you how to get into the secret government refuge.
      [_] It's the rapture, silly! Welcome our new overlords
      [_] This is our tax dollars at work?
      [_] Cheese!

    94. Re:Wow. by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      Anyway, rote-enlightenment is no different from the stuff they are already buying now. It'll last them until someone comes along and tells them something else "interesting".

      Unfortunately, one of the ancestor posts was correct - it is the /stupid/ people. The non-stupid but ignorant people fix the latter problem more often than not, it's the stupid people that persist in the intoxicating cloud of ignorance.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    95. Re:Wow. by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Insightful

      99.99% of Christians are not going to fear Nibiru after watching 2012, so it's only fair to distinguish between them and the people Morrison is talking about.

      A large percentage -- not all, but many -- of those Christians fear that some big magic grandpa in the sky is going to throw them into a lake of fire where a horned monster will supervise their torture for infinite time.

      That is an ever wackier belief than the Nibiru catastrophe -- at least we know planets exist, unlike (the literal versions of) gods, devils, and souls.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    96. Re:Wow. by The+-e**(i*pi) · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it is, I will have to ask my prof if there were any studies done on that.

    97. Re:Wow. by NiceGeek · · Score: 1

      "and that one girl who ran away from the Amish" - Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't the Amish have an "opt-out" policy when you hit adulthood?

    98. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Galaxy Quest is real, they even proved it in the movie.

    99. Re:Wow. by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Somewhere there is a grown man--a very pathetic man--who is attempting to lift things with the Force.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    100. Re:Wow. by Volguus+Zildrohar · · Score: 1

      don't feel good just because you're more sane than the bottom 0.001% who are off their meds.

      I think I will continue to feel good about that, thank you very much.

      Every day I'm not totally insane is a good day.

      --
      When confronted with one problem, some think "I'll use recursion". Now they are confronted with one problem.
    101. Re:Wow. by Emphron · · Score: 1

      yep - more likely to die in bed than anywhere else, guess I'll keep drinking the caffeine

    102. Re:Wow. by cayenne8 · · Score: 2
      "'I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide. I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves. I had one last week from a person who said, "I'm so scared, my only friend is my little dog. When should I put it to sleep so it won't suffer?"

      You know...this didn't really bother me or grab my attention THAT much, till I read that last one about the guy putting his dog down.

      Geez..I dunno what it is but I have a soft spot for animals. I mean, I can watch a slasher movie where Freddie or Jason chainsaws 20+ teens into pieces, BUT...let them kick one dog....and I'm outta there.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    103. Re:Wow. by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      when science ignores the unknown variables in any given situation, science becomes a religion

      Good science never ignores "unknown variables". The whole point of having a control set in an experiment is to isolate the variable being tested from all other variables, known or unknown.

      Carl Jung was hardly a crackpot, but believed in the existence of a collective unconscious as well as in synchronicity.

      I'm not certain what you're trying to argue here. Beliefs that are clearly irrational given what we know now might not have been clearly irrational before. Besides that, intelligent people often hold both rational and irrational beliefs.

      Truly admirable people are willing to reevaluate their beliefs (rational or no) when exposed to new evidence.

      Add to this the power of faith / placebo, and it suddenly becomes ignorant to mock nearly any belief.

      The placebo effect is well understood, even if we don't know the exact mechanism.

      What is this "power of faith" which you so casually conflate with the placebo effect?

      Any demonstrably irrational belief should be mocked. Loudly. And often. Especially if it's trying to claim special privilege as a "religious belief" (whatever that means).

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    104. Re:Wow. by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      I can't disagree, but in the case of the mother who was going to kill herself and her children, I can't help thinking that just being related to someone that stupid shouldn't be a capital offence...

      Just tell her to do it in that exact order, and that if she screws up the order, God will send her to Hell.

    105. Re:Wow. by eeth · · Score: 0

      1875 was just a blink in time ago. That which we "know" will *always* be overshadowed by that which we do not know.

      --
      "believe in my innocence and I might consider yours." -- charles bukowski "Scientific progress goes 'boink'?" -- Calvin
    106. Re:Wow. by MrSenile · · Score: 1

      And yet, many thousands of years ago, the existence of planets, stars, celestial bodies, and most of the science we take for granted was also a 'wacky belief'.

      The inability of proof is not the same as the ability to disprove.

    107. Re:Wow. by TheModelEskimo · · Score: 1

      >because doing so would challenge mainstream religions

      Bzzt, you fell for their bait. What you really mean is "would challenge mainstream corporations," because as we're all afraid to admit, the most brainwashed person in the world today is not the American God-worshipper, but the American consumer. 2012 isn't a religion. It's a worldwide marketing phenomenon that is potentially 100x worse than anything even Jim Jones could do. Please, stop ignoring the threat that consumerism represents.

    108. Re:Wow. by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      ""Ignorant" is not the same as "stupid", and can be cured by means much less dramatic than death.

      The problem is that we don't train people in the fine art of bullshit detection "

      It would also change most "+5 Insightful" posts to "-1 blowhard".

      Not referring to your post, of course - your level of ignorance is CLEARLY less than that of others.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    109. Re:Wow. by MeatBag+PussRocket · · Score: 2, Interesting

      wormwood can also be meant to imply poisoned or rotten. thats what (allegedly) makes true absinthe dangerous, in that pure wormwood oil is poison.

      --
      i wage a holy war against the apostrophe.
    110. Re:Wow. by flabordec · · Score: 0

      You mean this is might not be the year of Linux on the desktop? :'(

      --
      "I see undead people" Warcraft III - Necromancer
    111. Re:Wow. by Toraz+Chryx · · Score: 1

      It has happened before, and will happen again.

    112. Re:Wow. by spidercoz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No one wants to wake up on December 24th to watch their dim witted neighbor's body being carried from the next apartment due to hysteria induced suicide.

      Speak for yourself, I hate that bastard. Merry Fucking Christmas, dipshit.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
    113. Re:Wow. by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      For hundreds of years we've forced stupid people to wear hats to identify them... I think the Amish make it pretty clear.

    114. Re:Wow. by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      And there lies the answer to the original question, what to tell these people. Instead of opposing them by telling them their fears are false and irrational, tell them their fears are valid but they will be saved by superheros.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    115. Re:Wow. by MeatBag+PussRocket · · Score: 1

      on the contrary it amazes me that only about %0.01 of the people i've met recognize me as His Royal Highness of the Enthoiran Wood Fairy Kingdom.

      i joke... but seriously i'd give a third of my magical fairy kingdom for some mod points.

      --
      i wage a holy war against the apostrophe.
    116. Re:Wow. by richlv · · Score: 1

      i propose to tag this darwinaward or maybe also darwinawardcandidates.
      i would tag myself, but stupid slashdot tags still don't work in opera (usually i get replies telling that it doesn't work in any browser) :)

      --
      Rich
    117. Re:Wow. by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      "Every day I'm not totally insane is a good day."

      But your 99.999% partially insanity 100% is a real drag for the rest of us.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    118. Re:Wow. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      "Ignorant" is not the same as "stupid", and can be cured by means much less dramatic than death.

      True, but those means have several major disadvantages.
      They're much more expensive.
      They're much slower .

      And last but not least they're considerably less entertaining (from everyone else's point of view).

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    119. Re:Wow. by eeth · · Score: 0

      Good science never ignores "unknown variables". The whole point of having a control set in an experiment is to isolate the variable being tested from all other variables, known or unknown.

      How do you know, beyond all doubt, that you've isolated something beyond external influence?

      I'm not certain what you're trying to argue here. Beliefs that are clearly irrational given what we know now might not have been clearly irrational before. Besides that, intelligent people often hold both rational and irrational beliefs.

      Quantum mechanics continuously reveals examples of counter-intuitive and unbelievable behavior. What seems irrational now may later be proven true. All I'm saying is that it's foolish to be so sure of "the way things are" that one mocks and disregards ideas that seem to go against one's understanding of reality.

      The placebo effect is well understood, even if we don't know the exact mechanism.

      http://www.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUSTRE59E53320091015

      Any demonstrably irrational belief should be mocked. Loudly. And often. Especially if it's trying to claim special privilege as a "religious belief" (whatever that means).

      I politely disagree, citing above reasoning.

      --
      "believe in my innocence and I might consider yours." -- charles bukowski "Scientific progress goes 'boink'?" -- Calvin
    120. Re:Wow. by Webcommando · · Score: 1

      ahh ahh ahh ... A clever deception!

      --
      I love the sound of distortion in the morning -- webcommando
    121. Re:Wow. by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Not really. I was totally stoked about Absinthe when they finally legalized it. The whole history and idea just seemed cool.

      Then I tried it - and it's the nastiest shit I've ever had the misfortune of drinking. I'll stick with my more traditional spirits (namely - whiskey) instead.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    122. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Ignorant" is not the same as "stupid", and can be cured by means much less dramatic than death.

      The problem is that we don't train people in the fine art of bullshit detection

      TRUE

      When you've got a culture where many people take ancient Hebrew creation myths as true and are not laughed at, it's no surprise that belief in the imminent destruction of Earth by collision with the rogue planet Nibiru will proliferate.

      FALSE
      If we religion nuts really thought the world was ending, we wouldn't be asking any earthly powers stupid questions. We would be down on our knees asking God for mercy. Let's face it, if a rogue planet is about to collide with earth, there's nothing else you can do.

    123. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that we don't train people in the fine art of bullshit detection -- mostly because doing so would challenge mainstream religions...

      LOL!

      People are gullible enough to believe wild, fantastical speculations because... get this... the religions of the world have launched a vast conspiracy to keep people gullible.

      Okaaaaaaaaaaay....

      Of course, you'd expect me to say something like that because I'm obviously a secret agent working for the Vast Religious Conspiracy (VRC)(tm), and I've been sent on a secret mission to do so by the various members of the ruling council of the VRC, to whit: the pope, the antipope, the High Priestess of Wicca, Al Gore, the Chief Imman of Islam, and I kid you not, Budda hisself in his 387th reincarnation.

    124. Re:Wow. by Akira+Kogami · · Score: 1

      Umm, I'm assuming it's more based on the long-standing myth of the world ending on 2012 than the movie. The movie is just (irresponsibly) trying to capitalize off that fear.

    125. Re:Wow. by jbezorg · · Score: 1

      "Occam's razor" - if there are two hypothesis that explain the data equally well choose the simpler.

      This one is a double edged sword ( sorry ) when dealing with religious faith because the faithful's point of view can't get much simpler than "God wills it".

      --
      I've lost all my marbles except one & It's fun to test angular & centripetal acceleration in my skull
    126. Re:Wow. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Yes and no.
      Just how many idiots bring up Chernobyl on Slashdot when talking about US, EU, or Japanese nuclear power plants? They are just as wrong.
      Or people that are convinced that Bill Gates is the most evil person on earth?
      Or people that think vaccines cause autism?
      Or that think that anybody that goes to church is stupid?
      Or the people that protest when NASA launches anything that uses an RTG?
      Or the people that thought that Bush was a new Hitler?
      Or the people that think that Obama is the Anti-Christ?

      Let me go back in time for you since I am old.
      Back before we had 200 channels on TV and the Internet most people got their news from one of three networks and or the news paper. The news coverage was limited but they where actually pretty careful to report facts or report nothing at all. A lot of people grew up trusting that if it was on TV that it was based in fact. The downside is that you where limited in what facts you could get without a lot of effort.
      Now we have the Internet and 200 channels of TV. Now a person can find out a huge amount of facts but there is no gatekeeper. With that vast resource of facts comes an even bigger flood of opinion, ego, and fantasy all pretending to be facts.
      The problem is that not one of us knows everything and each of us can be fooled by a trusted source that is wrong. It is the worst kind of ego that looks at these poor people and writes them off as stupid. They have simply put their trust in the wrong source and way to many of us look at that movie and the other crap about 2012 and don't take the time to say, "It is fiction". It is a mistake that everybody will make at least once in their life. For most of us it will end up being a minor mistake that is soon forgotten but for others it can a terrible error.
      So stop calling people names and do something that helps.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    127. Re:Wow. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      A large percentage -- not all, but many -- of those Christians fear that some big magic grandpa in the sky is going to throw them into a lake of fire where a horned monster will supervise their torture for infinite time.

      You left off the topper--that the magic grandpa will subject them to eternal torment because he loves them.

    128. Re:Wow. by KhromeGnome · · Score: 1

      Well said. It seems fairly obvious that the more people we have, the more outliers we'll have, and the more global and accessible our communications and media become, the more we'll hear about them. Thus, it will appear as if the world is getting weirder and people crazier, when maybe it's just getting more populated and interconnected.

    129. Re:Wow. by ppanon · · Score: 1

      Well, apparently the Nibiru myth has been widespread in a number of "non-fiction" books by psychics and other flim-flam salesmen. So maybe they did some "research" after the movie, found all the Internet links on the subject and decided "Holy crap, there's something to this after all!".The movie just put something on their radar that they were predisposed to believe. It's not like there isn't a precedent - just think of all the people who took for granted the Dan Brown books.

      Perhaps the predisposition comes through a mistaken belief in psychics from a persuasive person that actually uses those beliefs to help people. That's the problem with "magic men" and shamans. Even if they have useful knowledge and do good and but just don't want to take the time to explain what they know, they create a predisposition that can be exploited by the less scrupulous. Unfortunately, with much of science becoming increasingly advanced, specialized, and inaccessible to the layman, and thus becoming indistinguishable from magic, it's not helping. Back when kid could pick up a wrench set or a soldering iron and play with an old engine or tube radio, science was less mystifying. Outlawing chemistry sets to "save the children" isn't helping any either.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    130. Re:Wow. by TJamieson · · Score: 1

      Geez..I dunno what it is but I have a soft spot for animals. I mean, I can watch a slasher movie where Freddie or Jason chainsaws 20+ teens into pieces, BUT...let them kick one dog....and I'm outta there.

      Y'know, I feel the same way; I think it has to do with the concept of innocence. An animal - particularly a dog - only knows what it is taught. We as humans find something valuable in that. I think the reason we have an easier time with the slasher films is because we figure, well, they're just another group of dumbass people who probably put themselves into the bad situation -- the dog doesn't have that same choice.

      --
      For the last time, PIN Number and ATM Machine are redundancies!
    131. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're suggesting he should refer the callers to Wendy Northcutt?

    132. Re:Wow. by syousef · · Score: 1

      The problem is that we don't train people in the fine art of bullshit detection

      Yes we do. Ignorant and naive people get taken advantage of on a regular basis. Those with a couple of brain cells to run together learn after a few incidents.

      "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."

      Well even for slow learners Futurama has the answer.

      From:
      http://futurama.wikia.com/wiki/Star_Trek
      When Zoidberg asks Amy to take the rubber bands off his claws (in a somewhat sexy manner), Amy's retort is "Fool me 7 times, shame on you. Fool me 8 or more times, shame on me." This line is a reference to a line in TOS: "Friday's Child".

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    133. Re:Wow. by GungaDan · · Score: 1

      Judaism is inherited from the mother. Christianity is inherited from the father, AFAIK.

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    134. Re:Wow. by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, lump all Christians in with the hysterical lunatics that really think the world will end in 2012 because a freaking movie told them it would.

      There are plenty of Christians that are completely blowing off the whole 2012 thing simply because they've actually read about it and aren't just getting their information from a movie. In fact, if the end of the world is coming, it's a good thing to be a Christian because it means Christ is returning as well.

      Seriously, I have talked to people like this. They are as stupid as they come and they aren't Christian. They get all their information about everything from TV and movies. It's funny because they're so stupid and it's sad to think that anyone can be that dumb.

    135. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will have you know that I am currently being productive doing administration work on a linux server which hosts the worlds largest Tron slash fiction website. Good day Sir!

    136. Re:Wow. by Chapter80 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that we don't train people in the fine art of bullshit detection

      Has anyone considered the fact that NASA may be the ones who are failing in the art of bullshit detection?

      Who hasn't pranked on someone of authority? I know of college students who called the suicide hotline because they were bored (not suicidal). I know of students who asked dumb questions just to get the teacher flustered. I know of reporters who asked politicians questions just to tease them.

    137. Re:Wow. by mpfife · · Score: 1
      Everyone's a huge believer in Darwinism/Evolution until they see it in actual practice.

      This, my friends, is evolution removing 'dead ends' in the gene pool.

    138. Re:Wow. by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      A rare first post, and the sig is the most appropriate text in there. Go figure.

      Actually, the IQ thing is only part of the problem. Smart people have a tendency to "not think" on a frequent basis. I'm always amazed how sane human beings are just fantastically gullible. I won't claim to be immune to this, but - damn - people will fall for the craziest shit.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    139. Re:Wow. by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Ignorant" can be cured. By teaching. "Refusing to be taught" is a different matter.

      And, bluntly, if you manage to get to 30 years of age in what we deem a "civilized" country and are still ignorant, it's usually not a lack of available information.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    140. Re:Wow. by ppanon · · Score: 1

      Well, it's possible to look at them as a control experiment. On the one hand they are willingly foregoing use of most modern conveniences, and wasting a lot of energy unnecessarily doesn't seem like a terribly smart idea. On the other hand, if modern civilization ever collapses for some reason (and it is fairly precarious in some ways), they are the best equipped, in terms of skills and tools, to survive the aftermath (assuming they live far enough away from the roaming bands of armed and starving city folk).

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    141. Re:Wow. by Progman3K · · Score: 1

      One tag missing is 'Darwin'

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    142. Re:Wow. by Follier · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Ignorant" is not the same as "stupid", and can be cured by means much less dramatic than death.

      Absolutely.

      Knowing nothing about science, astronomy, logic, or reality = ignorance.
      Buying into the 2012 claptrap = gullibility.
      Seeing an action movie and thinking it's real = stupidity.

      I'm glad we could clear that up. (seriously though, I agree with your assessment that magical thinking is a cultural thing, and we should all have far less tolerance for it.)

    143. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...developed by people who never invented the wheel...

      I beg to differ - Mayan calendar is quite literally in the shape of a wheel! ;-) The long and short cycles are literally the revolutions of a wheel ;-)

    144. Re:Wow. by spidercoz · · Score: 1

      I don't know who these young, smart people you speak of are, but most of the people I know younger than me I'm astounded by the things that they don't know; things I would take to be common knowledge or at least necessary for a high school education. And their critical thinking skills are for shit.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
    145. Re:Wow. by Macrat · · Score: 1

      Correct, but I think deciding to kill yourself and your loved ones based on a work of fiction counts as stupid.

      But it is based on actual FACTS. :-)

    146. Re:Wow. by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Stupid is as stupid does. There are lots of people with high IQs that do stupid things. THOSE are the ones who constantly amaze me. Once you take the statistically dumb people, carve out the minor fraction who are actually sane and rational, then add in all the smart people who do stupid things (or fall for stupid shit like this) on a regular basis anyway, and you've got way more than 50% acting like idiots.

      My sister is a good example. I put her squarely in the stupid category. She does things, and falls for pseudo-science hoopla, on a regular basis. Her IQ is 122 - 1.5 std deviations above the mean. She's smart, but she does dumb things. I think rational thinking and analytical skills are absent from most people - or at least unexercised.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    147. Re:Wow. by Jonny_eh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Notice that in movie trailers whenever the death of an animal is implied (@ 1:34), they specifically show that it turns out the animal is alive, of course, in the same trailer they can kill oodles of humans. They go out of their way to show the animal is alive despite the fact that it can take away from the joke and waste precious 'trailer' time.

    148. Re:Wow. by Follier · · Score: 1

      This "idiocracy" meme (that the masses are stupid and we are the smart ones) is just ego stroking - don't feel good just because you're more sane than the bottom 0.001% who are off their meds.

      Maybe I just feel like there are more stupid, gullible people around because I know so many of them personally, like half my co-workers, most of my family, all of my wife's friends, and the majority of people I randomly start conversations with. And don't even get me started on the rubes who still vote Republican.

      Thank goodness it's all in my head.

    149. Re:Wow. by spidercoz · · Score: 1

      I would indeed have to say that my own mocking is in fact directly proportional to the pushiness of the devotee (chump). The truly exacerbating have nearly provoked violence from me. (I really wanted to punch Brother Jed once about 10 years ago)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
    150. Re:Wow. by Quirkz · · Score: 1
      Now I'm curious what you think *I* think about my nation's history and place in the world. But considering it's in the same sentence with mainstream religion, it's got to be good.

      Also, has anyone considered some of these people might be trolls? They're not just for slashdot, after all ...

    151. Re:Wow. by mpfife · · Score: 1
      "The problem is that we don't train people in the fine art of bullshit detection -- mostly because doing so would challenge mainstream religions"

      Or Phrenology, or blood-letting, or using Radium as a cure-all, or Kellog's wacko health camps,etc. Religion is far from having the 'corner' on bad ideas and what you call 'bullshit'. I am getting very tired of this kind of blanket Slashdot condemnation of 'religion' (which one by the way? There's thousands including Judaism, Hinduism, Sekes and other favorites of 'progressives') as being for only the brain-dead. Yes, the scientific method has brought us everything from modern medicine to inventions that make our lives more rich to a greater understanding of the cosmos. I personally am a computer scientist and love the field of research/discovery. But even science makes just as many mistakes. It learns from them and goes on. Just as many religions have too. The have a wealth of human knowledge stored in them if you'd get beyond your own biggotry and hang-ups to read about it. Or perhaps I should keep bringing up the mistakes of science every time you want to make a point and then blanketly call all scientists idiots and those that follow what they've done as mindless drones spewing the results of studies they didn't even do themselves.

      Dont' forget that Mendel who first documented and tried to understand genetic traits, Georges Lemaître who finally proved the big bang - were both clergy of the Catholic Church. Not to mention education for the masses and health care for those who couldn't pay for it among others.

      You sound just as ignorant/closed minded as those 'religious idiots' when you say what you did - and I for one didn't even finished reading the rest of your obviously well balanced and informed comment after that sentence.

    152. Re:Wow. by trum4n · · Score: 1

      just dont let the moron kill his perfectly good dog. it didnt do anything wrong!

    153. Re:Wow. by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Nice to see I'm not the only one who feels that way. if you are so damned stupid as to kill yourself over a fricking Hollywood special effect flick? Well then please do, so your obviously pathetic genetic material won't be passed on. I mean is NASA gonna have to sit there every time a disaster flick is released and broadcast warnings for the stupid?

      I can just see their "a public service announcement for the stupid" before every movie where some nice quiet Henry Gibson type comes on and says "Movies aren't real. they can't hurt you. So sit back and enjoy and remember there is nothing to fear". How fricking sad that we have enough morons that we could even be having this discussion.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    154. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, except that there are actual cults and believers on which this fiction was based on.

    155. Re:Wow. by alx5000 · · Score: 1

      Yeah... But then you have God to explain. And then it's turtles all the way down...

      --
      My 0.02 cents
    156. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Big stars that fall in our seas usually create tsunamis that ravage the land.

      Then tell them to go on an extended cruise - you'll not even be affected by a tsunami at sea, I'll wager.

    157. Re:Wow. by lgftsa · · Score: 1

      I find your lack of faith disturbing.

    158. Re:Wow. by Z1NG · · Score: 1

      I find your lack of faith disturbing. You won't be so glib when I Force choke you.

    159. Re:Wow. by FSWKU · · Score: 1

      The chance of educating these people is slim to none. The recidivism rate of stupidity is astoundingly high. The success stories few and fleeting.

      Meaning Ron White proved to be one of the more insightful people around with four simple words: "You can't fix stupid."

      --
      "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
    160. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn you, lear years!

    161. Re:Wow. by 16384 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Much easier than that:

      Mat 24:35-36 Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away. But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.

    162. Re:Wow. by Temujin_12 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just tell them there is no mention of Nibiru in the Bible

      I did that, but apparently theres a mention of a "star called wormwood which will fall into the sea"

      [facepalm]

      I agree.

      [facepalm].

      The problem is that we don't train people in the fine art of bullshit detection -- mostly because doing so would challenge mainstream religions

      "The problem is that we don't train people in the fine art of critical thinking -- mostly because doing so would challenge the intellectually lazy's of mainstream religions"

      As a Christian, I frequently mentally (and sometimes physically) [facepalm] when talking with other religious people.

          -Young earth creationists

          -Militant anti-evolutionists

          -God gave us the earth so anything we do to it must be His will

          -That person doesn't believe the same things as me so they must be going to hell

          -That person sins, so I'm justified in hating/judging/ostracizing them

          -etc. etc. etc.

      These aren't the markings of a religious person or mainstream religion in general and it is dishonest to attribute these kinds of things to everyone who is religious . These are merely are the markings of those who have failed to have an open mind and apply reason and logic to their faith. These kinds of people are more concerned about being right than what's right. And what's more condemning to them is that they are more concerned about being right than they are in following the core tenants of their faith to show charity and compassion towards their fellow men.

      On the flip side, what further bruises my forehead is when I see a person or group of people who have faith in God do adjust their beliefs to new evidence they see while still holding on to elements of their faith they see as still consistent with that evidence and they are ridiculed for doing so by others claiming to be critical thinkers. Why would such a person attack the essence of the scientific method, namely the adjustment of theories against evidence? The answer is too often that, although they'd like to think otherwise, those who attack people simply for having (or not having) faith in God fear what they don't understand and thus feel the need to tear down it. It's our nasty primal instinct kicking in. Take away the fear and replace it empathy and understanding of why people choose (or don't choose) to have faith in God, and the desire to attack, belittle, or demean will go away on both sides.

      --
      Faith is a willingness to accept something w/o complete proof and to act on it. Reason allows you to correct that faith.
    163. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the Hebrew calender 2010 happened over 4000 years ago. So, we're cool.

    164. Re:Wow. by neutrak · · Score: 1

      remember how this was the wrong date for ignorant hysteria anyway? http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/10/26/1517242/2012-a-Miscalculation-Actual-Calendar-Ends-2220?from=rss please, let's get our irrational doomsday theories correct.

    165. Re:Wow. by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      ""Ignorant" is not the same as "stupid", and can be cured by means much less dramatic than death."

      Unless you are a Yanomame that never has been in touch with "western civilization" or something like this, going to an entertainment Hollywood cinema and screaming "Oh, my God! we all are going to die by 2012!" is not a symptom of ignorance but plain stupidity.

      "The problem is that we don't train people in the fine art of bullshit detection"

      I can go to the hard extreme of conceding the benefit of doubt to your tipical "aunt Tillie" being bitten by a Nigerian scam or your average redneck taking his Holly Bible for a scientific paper. Going to an obviously hollywoodesque fiction film and taking it for true is way beyond repair.

    166. Re:Wow. by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one that read that as a kid and thought "star my ass, it sounds like radiation poisoning to me"? I always thought "well, to a primitive people I'm sure an ICBM would look like a star on its way down, and anybody drinking waters coming from the contaminated area would of course get sick and die.... or maybe it was just because I was bored out of my skull during bible class and needed something to do.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    167. Re:Wow. by megamerican · · Score: 1

      I know, what fools!

      Everyone knows that on 12/21/2012 aliens will begin recolonization of the planet. It'll start with a virus spread by genetically engineered bees. This virus will create an alien being inside the body, consuming your flesh and bone as nourishment. A group of men working above and parallel to government colluded with these aliens feigning to help them with colonization but worked secretly on a vaccine for the virus, but failed.

      Anyone who says otherwise is obviously an alien replacement super-soldier or fooled by one.

      The virus and alien needs immense heat in order to gestate and grow. This is why we are being fear mongered into cutting carbon emissions and trying to cool the planet. It is our only hope to stop the alien take over of the planet.

      --
      If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
    168. Re:Wow. by Sinning · · Score: 1

      If we religion nuts really thought the world was ending, we wouldn't be asking any earthly powers stupid questions. We would be down on our knees asking God for mercy. Let's face it, if a rogue planet is about to collide with earth, there's nothing else you can do.

      So the world is ending on Sunday? I need to pack!

    169. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that we don't train people in the fine art of bullshit detection...

      Bullshit detection is as real as common sense.

    170. Re:Wow. by Bakkster · · Score: 1

      99.99% of Christians are not going to fear Nibiru after watching 2012, so it's only fair to distinguish between them and the people Morrison is talking about.

      A large percentage -- not all, but many -- of those Christians fear that some big magic grandpa in the sky is going to throw them into a lake of fire where a horned monster will supervise their torture for infinite time.

      No, they fear that the heathens will get thrown into the lake of fire. Unless, of course, they're a 'casual' Christian and don't actually believe it anyway, and then why group them together?

      That is an ever wackier belief than the Nibiru catastrophe -- at least we know planets exist, unlike (the literal versions of) gods, devils, and souls.

      While you can't disprove a religion, you can easily disprove a planet hiding behind the sun by looking behind it.

      Sure, there are a few old church ladies who want to put their dog down before the rapture, just as there are a few old new-age ladies who want to kill their dog before Nibiru crashes into the earth. They don't really reflect on the beliefs of others who might otherwise be associated with them.

      Of course, if they do, all atheists are stupid for planning to kill themselves in 2012. ;-)

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    171. Re:Wow. by COMON$ · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Dude this is slashdot, if you mention Christianity the readers just substitute "ignorant masses". You have to stick to certain rules in this forum. It is the fad of our culture right now to Christian bash, after all they are not as good as the rest of humanity, they are just silly ignorant people who are a plague on society that need to be dealt with.

      According to /.ers there is no rational in believing in any God, but it is ok to say you are part of any religion as long as it isn't one related to Judaism.

      It is also rational to know without a doubt that there is no God.

      On a brighter side it is good to see another rational christian on these forums and that I am not alone. Now brace yourself, my post is about to get modded into oblivion.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    172. Re:Wow. by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Indeed, we're apparently falling down on the game with improbable heros, and problems everyone knows some actual person could not defeat.

      True, but for every problem that you cannot defeat, there will be another who will come up with a solution.

      'Fairy tales are more than true — not because they tell us dragons exist, but because they tell us dragons can be beaten.' -G. K. Chesterton

      Awesome quote.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    173. Re:Wow. by psithurism · · Score: 1

      I try to keep in mind that only most outrageous opinions of the populace will be highlighted in places like this, but then I talk to a few neighbors and friends and realize: No, there are wacky people all around me who think the world will end every decade or so on top of a dozens of other outlandish ideas.

      Christian, atheist, agnostic, Jewish, Muslim, Shamanic, Wiccan, or who knows what, it makes little difference. There are a _large_ number of people out there with too little to think about except: "why would millions be sunk into CG effects for something that won't happen"?

      Or are all the crazies just living around me?

    174. Re:Wow. by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1
      I dunno about studies, but there was just a major court case in Britain over who is and isn't a Jew. The court ruled that a child of a Jewish man and a woman who had converted to Judaism was allowed to go to a Jewish school, which, in the words of some Orthodox Jews, overturns three thousand years of tradition (in saying that the kid in question wasn't actually a Jew unless his mother was.)

      Many Zoroastrians claimed that you could only be Zoroastrian if your father was, although some have always been open to conversion by outsiders. The religion as a whole generally prohibits proselytizing, or at least strongly discourages it.

      And on the far end of the continuum are, or were, the Shakers, where you couldn't be a Shaker if your parents were, because, well, it was a celibate religion. Which is why there are only about 3 Shakers left and within 20 years it'll be a dead religion.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    175. Re:Wow. by Exception+Duck · · Score: 2, Informative

      Used to be they would kill/hurt animals. No special effects.
      Probably still do in some movies, maybe not in the west but ...

    176. Re:Wow. by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "What if she got pregnant by raping Stephen Hawking?"

      Her breed may get her intelligence and Hawking's strengh and handsomeness.

    177. Re:Wow. by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "Michael Moore and Al Gore have "documentaries" that at the very least have statements and facts proven to be untrue, and plenty of people believe them."

      But at least Gore and Moore *pretended* to be producing documentaries, not fiction films.

    178. Re:Wow. by BertieBaggio · · Score: 1

      Bubba from Folsom would like to lodge a disagreement with the second half of your statement...now try asking where he's going to lodge it.

      In GPs 'second half', of course.

      --
      If all you have is a grenade, pretty soon every problem looks like a foxhole -- MightyYar
    179. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgive my moment of autistic misunderstanding, but I'm having trouble parsing the meaning of 'more than true' in the Chesterton quote. What exactly is that supposed to mean? Isn't that operating on the assumptions that fairy tales are usually thought of as true? The use of the word 'true' is throwing me here.

    180. Re:Wow. by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      That quote from Men in Black seems very appropriate (and I notice the movie is quoted several times in this thread)
      "A person is smart. People are stupid"

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    181. Re:Wow. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      a misinterpretation of a calendar developed by people who never invented the wheel and who's year had only 360 days.

      A misinterpretation? Definitely.

      Never invented the wheel? Untrue; archaeologists have unearthed Mayan toys with wheels on them. The Mayans just never put it to constructive use. There is speculation that the Mayans in fact were culturally biased against such efficiency--building a temple with less effort because you used wheels would devalue the temple *because* it took less effort.

      The Mayan solar year had 365 days. They had a 360-day calendar which was followed by five "nameless" days at the end, which they considered to be a time when the gates to the Underworld were open and a very dangerous time.

    182. Re:Wow. by Lord+Maud'Dib · · Score: 1

      So the solution is to live... under the sea! Oh, and buy up all the bottles water you can before it is contaminated.

    183. Re:Wow. by Korin43 · · Score: 1

      Amish ideas about education, children, women and covering things up by shunning victims are what made me use that example.

    184. Re:Wow. by spyder-implee · · Score: 1

      To the entire United States.

      --
      Take what ye can. Give nothing back!
    185. Re:Wow. by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      And that's the difference between US movies and British movies. Look at a UK film like St. Trinians. Comedy dog death scene (it's kicked into the bin of a large lawnmower). No way that would have happened if the film had been a mainstream US movie (not to mention the underage sex, drug use, drug manufacturing, and incidents of assault, cheating, prostitution and theft shown as having hugely turning out unconditionally well for the perpetrators). In fact, I'm curious to know if the US release of the movie (after a delay of at least a year) actually survived without butchering in the editing room. They certainly murdered the trailer.

      The double-standard for animals may be to do with their innocence, but it is probably also to do with people's learned ability to discount others. Many people can quite easily cut off their empathy for other humans with an in-built prejudice (they are rich, they are a slut, they are young, they cheat or whatever), but there are no such dismissals readily available for animals. Hence empathy can persist.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    186. Re:Wow. by Creepy · · Score: 1

      I was warned the cheap stuff is like that, and the good stuff is $100+, so never bothered to try it. Whiskey (which means life's water, lol) has rotgut varieties, too.

      As for Dec 21, 2012, which Mayan said it was the end of the world? I've only heard that from, well, pretty much only white loonies and doomsday Christians (oop, we missed May 2003 - gotta reschedule, lol).

    187. Re:Wow. by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

      What's this "we" thing you're talking about?

    188. Re:Wow. by shermo · · Score: 1

      http://friends.wikia.com/wiki/Erika_Ford

      Reminds me of this episode

      --
      Insanity: voting in the same two parties over and over again and expecting different results
    189. Re:Wow. by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      You must realize, he is fielding questions from a population of millions of people, some significant percentage of whom are literally psychotic (which actually means losing touch with reality, not being an axe murderer).

      After the Columbia incident, NASA had an email address for citizens to email tips and photographs of Columbia debris. There was plenty of good information coming in from concerned folks helping NASA literally pick up the pieces. There were well-meaning photographs of burnt toast found in a restaurant parking lot. And there were more than a few eye-witness descriptions of aliens attacking the shuttle and end-of-times prophecies. NASA attracts lots of attention; some of it very weird.

    190. Re:Wow. by tsm_sf · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oh thanks, he did forget to mention an irrational persecution complex.

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    191. Re:Wow. by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      While you can't disprove a religion, you can easily disprove a planet hiding behind the sun by looking behind it.

      I think they are actually in the same category. You "can't disprove" that there is an invisible planet hiding behind the sun (with gravity suspended) or one that god will put into existence out of nothing etc etc. One can come up with any kind of fantasy and call it not disprovable. It's really no different than saying that you "can't disprove" that an omnipotent being *created the universe* in 6 days or any of the miracles in the bible.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    192. Re:Wow. by BewireNomali · · Score: 1

      I agree with you in general. in regards to religion i'll go further and wager that many people even become skeptical - especially as they get older, but remain committed outwardly mostly for appearances - like an old couple in an empty marriage - the idea being sort of, "leave this and go to what?" the fact that the slashdot crowd is mostly agnostic/atheistic has a lot to do with things that are not in our control. a more questioning nature, insatiable curiousity, and the need for significant evidence for suspension of disbelief - i suspect over the long haul that engineer/scientist types will prove to have a genetic basis. for everyone else, people need things to believe in to justify and give external value to their existence. also, i am certain the God/Devil/Evil aliens paradigm is all related and over the long haul we'll reconsider what we term adults. adults, with varying exceptions, are just children who've stopped growing. and any parent or uncle or aunt can tell you you can convince a young child of ANYTHING. My nephew thought i was a powerful magician for about six months despite the fact i only knew two hokey magic tricks. that's until my sister showed him how i was doing them and then he went into a funk for about a week. it was like he almost needed to believe that i had magic - something unexplainable. i digress. i imagine that the couple of years are gonna be awesome for these types as they face what they perceive is their own encroaching oblivion. i would imagine that their joys and ecstasies will stand out in the sharpest relief now. i'm just looking for opportunities to fleece some dummies - maybe buying some properties on the cheap because - well - what the hell are you gonna need it for if you think the world is gonna end? is it not you in this instance who is fleecing me? :D

      --
      un burrito me trampeó.
    193. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly they should have had one of these signs for Micheal Moore's films too.

    194. Re:Wow. by Abreu · · Score: 1

      I am pretty sure there are plenty of us who believe in Christ and in science at the same time.

      I for one, do get tired of the instant flame fests that erupt every time christianity is mentioned here. So I avoid it. YMMV, of course.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    195. Re:Wow. by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Funny


      Or just show them this re-edit of the 2012 trailer: link. It's pretty much impossible to take the film seriously after seeing that. (Assuming you were inclined to take the film seriously in the first place).

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    196. Re:Wow. by awengine · · Score: 1

      Take away the fear and replace it empathy and understanding of why people choose (or don't choose) to have faith in God, and the desire to attack, belittle, or demean will go away on both sides.

      Ok, then why do you think people choose to have faith in god? As a former Christian, I think I have some insight into the reasons, for at least a significant fraction of believers, and it has nothing to do with reason or critical thinking. It has more to do with the comfort of delusions, and the fear of not having them.

    197. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter what you do or don't know. If you honestly believe the world is going to end in 2012 then you are stupid. Ignorant doesn't even start to cover it.

    198. Re:Wow. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Not really. I was totally stoked about Absinthe when they finally legalized it. The whole history and idea just seemed cool."

      Funny thing about Absinthe...aside from the legends about it, the laws are weird too.

      I do believe it really has never been illegal in the US to possess and consume absinthe, but, you couldn't sell it...at least not at what most normal levels of thujone (comes from the wormwood, active ingredient I believe)...and you actually still cannot import most Absinthes.

      Also, over the years...Absinthe that has been made...is shit mostly. There is one guy, from New Orleans that really got into it...researched Absinthes, found OLD pre-ban bottles of Absinthe, and analyzed them with mass spectrometers, etc. He has recreated the real stuff, that wins awards in Europe (made in France I believe), but, he can't import most of what he makes.

      If you get a chance..try some of his stuff, look here: Jade Liquors. Read what they have there, then look at the reviews of the good stuff he makes.

      Now, of course, all Absinthe has a strong licorice taste....if you don't like that, you won't like any of them, but, if you do...then there are Absinthes that are good, but, you'll have to try to import them, or get a friend in EU to send them to you, I've had it done, and never had a problem with customs checking it and catching it.

      Oh, here's another older article about Mr. Breaux

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    199. Re:Wow. by ultranova · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Children not having anything to do with the concept of innocence... right.

      As someone who still remembers his childhood, I'd like to point out that children are indeed inocent - which means that they are the closest things to demons this side of Hell, torturing other people for fun without even a hint of guilt or conscience. Sure, they are a joy to be around if you're adult and thus superior in power, but absolute horrors otherwise.

      The same is true of animals, of course - a dog can be absolutely loyal to its master yet an absolute horror to everyone else.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    200. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not afraid of the World's End (TM) ... but regular confession and keeping handy some Holy Water is a good idea.

    201. Re:Wow. by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Apparently there was a movie from the 50's, and I apologize for not knowing more info, where the dog was killed, and there was a huge outrage, so Hollywood took the hint.

      Of course, people's sensibilities were less benumbed in those days, so maybe it wouldn't be such a big deal now. But given the general philosophical bent in Tinseltown it doesn't surprise me that animals are considered more important than humans. Of course, movies generally avoid doing horrible things to babies or children, too, for much the same reason, but I noticed that the post above seemed indifferent to the concept of someone killing their children compared to their pets.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    202. Re:Wow. by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it would only be irresponsible if a significant proportion of the population were dumb as a box of hammers... oh, I get your point.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    203. Re:Wow. by spun · · Score: 1

      GP post gets +5 insightful, proving your persecution complex is delusional. You see, Slashdot has nothing against religious people.

      Only against stupid people.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    204. Re:Wow. by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      Honestly, these people see 'Transformers', 'Superman', 'Batman', 'Star Trek', 'Dogma', 'Godzilla', and '2012'. Then they choose to believe the world is ending but they won't be saved by Superman or Batman. They won't be killed first by giant robots or a giant lizard. And angels and demons... well ok they probably do believe in Dogma.

      So what are they worrying about? Jay and Silent Bob will put a stop to it. Snoogans.

    205. Re:Wow. by Eggplant62 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I said the same thing, only the first thought through my head was, "What's so damned hard about telling these people they should seek professional guidance, like say from a physician or a counselor?"

    206. Re:Wow. by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem is that we don't train people in the fine art of bullshit detection -- mostly because doing so would challenge mainstream religions

      "The problem is that we don't train people in the fine art of critical thinking -- mostly because doing so would challenge the intellectually lazy's of mainstream religions"

      "Critical thinking" is a fancy name for bullshit detection. And mainstream religion is intellectually lazy -- people, sadly, prefer the simple answers, and any spiritual practice that requires intellectual rigor loses out to some version based on "parrot this doctrine".

      The answer is too often that, although they'd like to think otherwise, those who attack people simply for having (or not having) faith in God fear what they don't understand and thus feel the need to tear down it.

      No, most people who do not have "faith in God" were, at one point, religious believers and so understand such faith quite well.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    207. Re:Wow. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Interesting.

      Well, a modern 'for instance' in the US was Terminator 2. In the special editions, you can see a scene cut where the bad terminator killed young John Connor's dog when he was at the step parents home setting a trap for John. They didn't leave that in for the theatrical showing, and I think a lot had to do with it showing a dog (you didn't see the actual strike, but, heard the stab and dog yelp) being killed.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    208. Re:Wow. by ultranova · · Score: 1

      You "can't disprove" that there is an invisible planet hiding behind the sun

      Actually, you can, both from the gravitational effects and because the situation is not stable: two planets in the same orbit are stationary relative to each other, and if the orbits differ so will orbital periods, so they won't stay in opposing sides of the Sun for very long. See Wikipedia animation for Big Splash Moon formation theory.

      (with gravity suspended)

      This makes the situation more, not less, complex, since neither Sun, Earth nor the Milky Way Galaxy are stationary. Also, since General Relativity relates gravity to distortions in the structure of spacetime, the phrase "with gravity suspended" doesn't really make sense.

      Maybe if you'd somehow nullify the mass of the other planet - but even then it wouldn't stay opposite to Earth for more than a few years.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    209. Re:Wow. by shentino · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that a 100 percent inheritance rate would bind everyone in an inheritance cascade.

    210. Re:Wow. by chickenarise · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On the flip side, what further bruises my forehead is when I see a person or group of people who have faith in God do adjust their beliefs to new evidence they see while still holding on to elements of their faith they see as still consistent with that evidence and they are ridiculed for doing so by others claiming to be critical thinkers. Why would such a person attack the essence of the scientific method, namely the adjustment of theories against evidence?

      The scientific method is a belief system. It is the belief that I can presume a falsifiable theory to be true until it is proven false. The problem the scientific method has with religion is that you are taking a theory that is in no way falsifiable and believing it is true. So you are not being consistent with your beliefs, sorry.

      The answer is too often that, although they'd like to think otherwise, those who attack people simply for having (or not having) faith in God fear what they don't understand and thus feel the need to tear down it. It's our nasty primal instinct kicking in. Take away the fear and replace it empathy and understanding of why people choose (or don't choose) to have faith in God, and the desire to attack, belittle, or demean will go away on both sides.

      Wrong. I feel the need to tear it down because a whole bunch of you religious folks decide the policies that affect my life, and sometimes these policies are based on policy from the Bible which was magically inspired by God (the unfalsifiable entity).

      --
      One convenient locations...in Africa.
    211. Re:Wow. by shentino · · Score: 1

      Insanity is hereditary. You get it from your children.

    212. Re:Wow. by AnotherShep · · Score: 1

      Bated.

    213. Re:Wow. by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Somewhere there is a grown man--a very pathetic man--who is attempting to lift things with the Force.

      He got paid by the CIA, using your tax money, to do it. I guess he mastered the Jedi Mind Trick first ;).

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    214. Re:Wow. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Used to be they would kill/hurt animals. No special effects.
      Probably still do in some movies, maybe not in the west but ...

      Yeah. For example you can watch an old movie with horses in it like a Western. If a horse that's shot falls over sideways, it was a trained stunt. If the horse falls over forward, they used a trip wire to make it fall on its face.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    215. Re:Wow. by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I believe that the Greek for wormwood is "apsinthos"; 'tis where the name of the drink comes from.

      So the bible predicts that a Mayan called Nbiru dumps absinthe in the sea in 2012, poisoning us all and causing the magnetic poles to flip. Sounds plausible to me.

    216. Re:Wow. by supersloshy · · Score: 1

      Is this close enough?

      "And the third angel sounded, and there fell a great star from heaven, burning as it were a lamp, and it fell upon the third part of the rivers, and upon the fountains of waters; And the name of the star is called Wormwood: and the third part of the waters became wormwood; and many men died of the waters, because they were made bitter." (Revelation 8:10, 11 - KJB).

      Does it say exactly when it'll happen? Nope. The Bible, in many different places within itself says that nobody on Earth will be sure when the end will come. Why so many people that call themselves Christians believe otherwise, I have no idea...

      --
      "Our country is not nearly so overrun with the bigoted as it is overrun with the broadminded." -Archbishop Fulton Sheen
    217. Re:Wow. by ultranova · · Score: 1

      You know if people are so stupid that they watch a movie and think that its, really going to happen, to the point that they are going to commit suicide, I say let them. we definitely don't need any more stupid people on this planet.

      Actually, we do: someone needs to clean the toilets, flip the burgers, and do all the other low-skill tasks technology is still uncapable of. On the other hand, ruthless sociopaths - you know, the people who are okay with stupid people dying because they a useless - not only do nothing useful, but actually cause damage, such as this current financial crisis.

      Mistaking hardness and lack of empathy for strength was fine as long as we were barbarians armed with pointed sticks, since it could do nothing more serious than cause pointless misery back then; but we're armed with nuclear weapons now, have already come close to a full-scale nuclear war more than once, and simply can't keep this tough-guy attitude up if we want to survive. It's bad enough coming from a knife-wielding street thug lowlife, but to actually see it get modded up in a forum for supposedly intelligent people... really doesn't give me much hope for humanity.

      You and people like you, rather than stupid people, are the problem.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    218. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its a sign - when I posted this comment - im post 667.

      Some might say that was bound to happen. I dunno its touch and go. Talking of which I need the pan.

    219. Re:Wow. by couchslug · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Correct, but I think deciding to kill yourself and your loved ones based on a work of fiction counts as stupid."

      It DOES get them out of our way. Too bad more religious belief and superstition doesn't end in benign suicide, but cults like Heavens Gate don't get much traction. I'm tired of the stupid, the willfully ignorant, and the religious. If we see a wave of suicides because of a stupid movie, count me among the people that will forward the stories as humor because I will be LMAO. The gene pool needs chlorinating anyway.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    220. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      All of a sudden a femdom site is going to start getting massive amounts of hits from Slashdot and think they have a new target audience.

    221. Re:Wow. by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      "The problem is that we don't train people in the fine art of critical thinking -- mostly because doing so would challenge the intellectually lazy's of mainstream religions"

      "lazy" isn't a noun.

      If it was a noun, the plural would probably be "lazies" or maybe, if it were odd, "lazys", but "lazy's" would be possessive, which wouldn't make sense here.

      And we do, in fact (at least, at each the public middle school, high schools, community college, and four year university I attended, YMMV) train people in critical thinking. OTOH, outside of the context of formal instruction in the subject, we frequently punish people for exercising it -- not because it threatens "mainstream religions" or even its "intellectual lazy's" as you refer to them, but because it threatens the position of the individual people who end up doing the punishing, who are often in positions of authority and don't like to be questioned. Some of those people may be intellectually lazy, but many of them intellectually quite capable and active, and just arrogant with those they see as beneath them. Likewise, some of them may be in positions of religious authority -- whether in mainstream religions are not, there is nothing special about mainstream religions in this regard -- but more of them are in positions of political, commercial, or other secular authority.

    222. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this close enough?

      "And the third angel sounded, and there fell a great star from heaven, burning as it were a lamp, and it fell upon the third part of the rivers, and upon the fountains of waters; And the name of the star is called Wormwood: and the third part of the waters became wormwood; and many men died of the waters, because they were made bitter." (Revelation 8:10, 11 - KJB).

      FYI, "Wormwood", a type of grass, in Russian is "Chernobyl."

    223. Re:Wow. by cusco · · Score: 1
      That was the nastiest you've ever tried? Child, you have no sense of adventure . . .

      I was just disappointed. While relaxing, I've had the same effect from taking kava-kava and three shots of rum. Of course the absinthe didn't taste as bad as the kava-kava, and didn't need the extensive preparation, but I was hoping for something more.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    224. Re:Wow. by cusco · · Score: 1

      No, it's not the end of the world for the Maya, only the end of a calendarial cycle. Their calendar is made up of multiple time keeping loops that mesh with each other (think gears in a clock), and all that happens in 2012 is that one of the loops starts over.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    225. Re:Wow. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Uhhh - wait. We are all aware that a canine critter is a carnivore, right? A predator. A killer. Well - actually, most of them are scavengers. But still.

      Just to be clear, I like dogs too - but I have no delusions about their innocence. Cats too. The only reason we get along with cats so well, is because we are huge, and they are small. Reverse the size, and those foul beasts would enjoy playing cat and human with us.

      Given a choice between a freaking huge cat, or a freaking huge dog, I'll take the dog. Dogs really are kinda innocent - they just snap your head off and swallow. Those cats are evil......

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    226. Re:Wow. by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      "Yet they can't distinguish between a movie trailer and real life."

      Thats a bit oversimplified. Unlike most movies, this one has years of blog/forum/internet sites devoted to exploring the 2012 theories. Searching for it reveals page after page of people all across the world who think 2012 means that 'something' will happen.

      So rather than being stupid, these people lack research skills that most college educated people probably take for granted. Googling for 2012 nirburu reveals 3,410,000 hits.

      The very first one is:
      Planet X Nibiru Projected Orbital Return - 2012
      This means that PlanetX/Nibiru is visible every 2000 (2160) years during its orbital pass. ( Sumerian and Mayan text both state that Nibiru is clearly ...
      churchofcriticalthinking.org/planetx.html - Cached - Similar -

      Church of critical thinking huh.... Now you tell me how and elderly person without a college education is supposed to filter through 3 million web sites when the vast majority do their absolute best to sound credible despite the authors of many of them being conspiracy nuts.

      But ya.... we really need to work on our education system.

    227. Re:Wow. by DoninIN · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm hoping I make three.
      However /. slowly becomes more like FARK with the passing of time. Things get dumbed down and the shouting content goes up. There's suddenly a wave of empowered bigotry against the religious and religion in general. Primarily from people who like to think they're smart, probably most of them are smart. I don't get why that is. I do get that a lot of is a backlash against the particularly intolerant strains of religions, but I'm always amused at the ease with which these tolerance police glibly stereotype people based on their religion, as long as it's either a big on that's an easy target, or a funny one with a lot of celebrities. If I were a little smarter my only response to them would be something like "Stalin wuz atheist like U sew U sux0r!" or something.

    228. Re:Wow. by greycortex · · Score: 1

      St. George's Distillery, in the San Francisco Bay area, recently began to produce an absinthe called Absinthe Verte. It has a strong anise flavour, with basil and a bunch of other herbs. The bottle looks especially ominous, what with the label having a monkey banging a cowbell with a human femur. This, after a flight of vodkas and whiskeys at the tasting, produced in me a feeling akin to being encased in cotton. It was like lying down cloud of cotton-coated drink. Fantastic. Sufficeth it to say, I did procure a bottle of this.

    229. Re:Wow. by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Or Phrenology, or blood-letting, or using Radium as a cure-all, or Kellog's wacko health camps,etc. Religion is far from having the 'corner' on bad ideas and what you call 'bullshit'.

      But those other ideas have little social power. Organized religion is just about the most powerful social force there is.

      If all the believers in alien abduction got together and said "We're going to stop the teaching of critical thinking", it wouldn't matter. If the most powerful priests and ministers and rabbis and imams got together and said "We're going to stop the teaching of critical thinking" -- well, you'd get modern society. Of course it's not quite that conscious or explicit.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    230. Re:Wow. by icebike · · Score: 1

      The FIRST thing you run into in any search is what a bunch of BS the whole thing is. You really have to dig to find any site that 1) suggests there is a shred of evidence and 2) is believable.

      Why is it that there is this fascination with ancient knowledge and the automatic assumption that ancient people were automatically smarter than the best scientists of today?

      What makes people trust a misinterpreted stone tablet that some one suggests predicts the return of some mystery planet that Radar can not see?

      Stupidity.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    231. Re:Wow. by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      A tale can be "just" true, which means the facts are accurate. Or it can be "more than true" which means they provide more value than just being accurate, in terms of insight into life and human nature. Chesterton is saying tales have more value than if they were merely "true" or accurate factually.
      And he is saying it in a clever way that will get him quoted while throwing off those wily autistics.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    232. Re:Wow. by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

      The problem with what you're saying is that faith is diametrically opposed to the scientific method. "Faith" is simply incompatible with building a world view on solid foundations that all people can be made to agree on, and in the end, simply represents submitting your will to another person who themselves have no objective basis for their faith, or even worse, who abuse faith in others to accomplish their financial or political goals. As such, faith inevitably leads to divisiveness as people choose to place their faith in competing ideologies with no way to see eye-to-eye, as there is no logical progression that leads to their positions, simply large leaps of faith that are made purely for social reasons. As someone who respects critical thought and rationalism, I simply find it impossible to trust the judgment of a person who is capable of placing their faith in ideas without objective support. The ideal for me is that everything, every scrap of information we're fed, should be questioned and challenged, and that the value of any given idea is defined by the objective support behind it. Ideology without support is without any value to me. It frustrates me that people try to build complex social systems on flimsy, indefensible foundations, and I often wish we would simply discard all of this obsolete cultural baggage and re-factor localized social fabric on a more simple and humble foundation that most non-sociopaths could actually agree on.

      I'm done ranting, for now, but my point is that you can't pick and choose when to be rational AND keep my respect. If you can't be made to see the unsupported and untrustworthy nature of most religious mythology, then you have too many blind spots to be trusted as a rational person. That doesn't make you a bad person, or someone I would necessarily strive to avoid, it simply makes you naive and irrational. I don't deny that religion can be useful in giving comfort and happiness, but if it comes at the expense of your ability to reason, then that's too high of a price to pay as far as I'm concerned.

      --
      "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
    233. Re:Wow. by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      These reports did not come from some long overlooked rainforest tribe, but rather from people intelligent enough to call NASA with worries and fears. These are people able to read or at least watch TV news, or surf the net.

      Yes and if they do enough web surfing, they'll run in to the 2012 apocalyptic believers. And if they're watching TV, they might also run in to the series of quasi-documentaries / commercials History channel is running on 2012 doomsday prophecies (some of which do this great job of intermixing astrophysicists' descriptions of phenomena like solar flares while explaining it's not doom with some dude screaming "doom").

      The lie is a lot larger than just a single movie. This isn't someone suddenly fearing hobbits. This is something that exists because the mythos is so widely spread that plugging in to it is instant buzz.

      That's not to say that these people aren't acting foolish when they believe all this crap. But the crap is spread widely enough that all avenues of messages will deliver it. And that itself adds weight to something that is otherwise void of substance.

    234. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, what person would kill themselves before actually knowing the event would even happen

    235. Re:Wow. by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      And yet, many thousands of years ago, the existence of planets, stars, celestial bodies, and most of the science we take for granted was also a 'wacky belief'.

      Every human culture has known about the stars and planets. They may not have known what they were, but everyone could look up and see that there were lights in the sky, and that some of them moved.

      No such observational evidence suggests the literal existence of gods, devils, souls, or the like.

      The inability of proof is not the same as the ability to disprove.

      While absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence, it sure as hell isn't evidence of presence either. "Do you see the invisible gorilla in the corner? You don't? That proves he exists!"

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    236. Re:Wow. by Truekaiser · · Score: 1

      yet the funny thing is the dog in the movie escapes unscathed.

    237. Re:Wow. by Cruciform · · Score: 0, Troll

      If they have faith in the capitalized God, the word subverted to mean the Christian god then of course they are open to ridicule.

      If you want to be an agnostic deist, go right ahead. But if you have faith in the vile fabrication that the Christians, Jews, and Muslims worship as a god, then expect to be attacked. If your "faith" means supporting a religious construct that endorses genocide, rape, and slavery, but you "only pick out the parts of the bible we agree with" then what good IS that faith?

      It's nothing more than fire insurance.

    238. Re:Wow. by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      Correct, but I think deciding to kill yourself and your loved ones based on a work of fiction counts as stupid.

      So is an entire country going to war, or letting the PATRIOT Act pass.

    239. Re:Wow. by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Now I'm curious what you think *I* think about my nation's history and place in the world.

      I don't claim to know what *you* think about the U.S.'s history and place in the world. I do know that entirely too many of my countrymen believe in some form of "American exceptionalism", the modern version of manifest destiny: that when other nations do kill civilians it's terrorism, but when we do it it's collateral damages, that when other nations treat prisoners inhumanely it's torture but when we do it it's "enhanced interrogation", that every other nation that tried to occupy Afghanistan failed but we have God on our side so will succeed, etcetera.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    240. Re:Wow. by WillDraven · · Score: 1

      I do believe that a guy named Jesus Christ (or whatever it was in the native tongue of the time) existed. I even have great respect for many of his teachings (opposition to tyrannical government, not killing, sharing, compassion, charity, drinking wine ;). However I stop short of believing his mom was a virgin magically knocked up by his omnipotent, omniscient father for the purpose of spreading these teachings and then get crucified so he can take responsibility for all the times we don't play by the rules, and then came back for a few days before vaporizing/flying back to heaven/spreading himself everywhere (because he is everywhere and inside of us).

      I can understand the utility for religion in a developing civilization simply because they lacked the knowledge to understand why certain actions were bad for the population. It's a lot easier to tell people not to do things because they'll burn in hell for eternity than saying "don't do this, bad stuff happens, well, no I don't know why..." Most of the religious laws had practical reasoning behind them that the people who wrote them didn't understand. Non-monogamy (without protection) spreads disease and results in children without 2 parents to care for them. Theft deprives people of their property. Jealousy promotes unstable social situation. Listening to your parents makes you more likely to survive. etc. etc.

      I've thought about starting an "Atheists for Jesus" group or some such, but I think people would assume we were converts instead of just some people who thought he had some good ideas.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    241. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      99.99% of Christians are not going to fear Nibiru after watching 2012...

      That's right - another set of superstitions got to them first. But if you made a movie saying that the Rapture was coming in 2012...

    242. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sufficeth it to say, I did procure a bottle of this.

      Uh yeah, cause they make the legal variety?

    243. Re:Wow. by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Not just opt-out, but kicked out for either 1 or 2 years.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    244. Re:Wow. by socsoc · · Score: 1

      Long standing myth? The world ended January 1st, 2000 thanks to the y2k bug, where have you been? After 2012, it may end again in 2038.

    245. Re:Wow. by 7-Vodka · · Score: 1

      On the flip side, what further bruises my forehead is when I see a person or group of people who have faith in God do adjust their beliefs to new evidence they see while still holding on to elements of their faith they see as still consistent with that evidence and they are ridiculed for doing so by others claiming to be critical thinkers. Why would such a person attack the essence of the scientific method, namely the adjustment of theories against evidence?

      Because my friend, what you have is not worthy of being called a "theory".
      A theory, in the scientific sense of the word, is an analytic structure designed to explain a set of empirical observations. A scientific theory does two things:

      1. it identifies this set of distinct observations as a class of phenomena, and
      2. makes assertions about the underlying reality that brings about or affects this class.

      The fact that you claim to use the scientific method only proves you don't even grasp the basics.

      Your religion was not formulated by collecting data through observation and experimentation and consists of no hypotheses... Religions are nothing but systems of pubic control where people are told what to think and how to behave in a very illogical and unscientific manner totally devoid of critical thinking.

      Please take your pile of stinking nonsense and stop using words like science in association.

      --

      Liberty.

    246. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it already is 2012 according to the Gregorian calendar...
      oh crap

    247. Re:Wow. by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      I am actually shocked that I got +3. Is it a complex if it is real?

      Truth does not require intelligence, many idiots refuse to walk off the edge of a cliff for they know they will fall to their deaths. Many people believe in the Deity of Christ and are stupid as well. However, there are subsets of each that make outlandish claims about gravity and about Christ, apologetics unlike faith requires intelligence.

      I can say for a fact that most Christians I know, except for the apologists, live most of their lives in fear of the "Intelligent Civilized" folk who will mock their faith at every turn. Try walking into a science department in any University and profess to be a Christian, you would be lucky to graduate. Try being a Christian Science teacher who defends the theories of evolution, you would be lucky to get the job. This is where it starts, Christians are killed around the world every day for their faith, when was the last time you saw it in the news? Christians spend billions bringing healthcare and food to the nations, when was the last time anyone talked about that? No, what you see is the rare nutballs, you never feel the need to defend a christian who is being berated in a classroom because....it is socially acceptable.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    248. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I certainly do not share my parent's religious beliefs ... I want to leave this intentionally ambiguous.

      Your prerogative, but I'll go for the point-blank: I do not share my mother's dishonesty, dumb enough to be terrified of eternal hellfire, "clever" enough to hedge her bets by siding with evangelical fundamentalism.

      Put another way, it's not so much "I want to be a good person", but "If I'm not a good person, I'll go to hell!". The key here is a sincere willingness, or lack thereof, to attempt introspection and critical thinking, to attain a better understanding of oneself and the world that surrounds us.

      Instead, whenever things get ambiguous on any issue and need a bit of mental muscle, ask your pastor for guidance or buy the book at your local christian bookstore, and they'll give you the party line, from the top (your Fallwells and Robertsons) right on down.

      It's infuriating how often I see misguided evangelicals tie themselves up in hypocritical and contradictory knots, without even noticing it, because they have atrophied their ability to do so, and are not going to grow out of it anytime soon.

    249. Re:Wow. by tuxgeek · · Score: 1

      I think all you should be very afraid
      You need to liquidate all your bank accounts to someone you can trust
      It's a tough assignment, but I'll take it
      Please send me your bank account and pin numbers care of this web site
      You'll feel better for it, no thanks necessary

      --
      "Suppose you were an idiot...and suppose you were a member of Congress...but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
    250. Re:Wow. by rainsford · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So despite living in a country completely dominated by Christian beliefs, to the point where even HINTING that a Presidential candidate isn't Christian is a viable campaign tactic, some people (such as the parent) will insist that Christians are persecuted and looked down on for their beliefs. For people who hold religious beliefs that are ACTUALLY in the minority, this is incredibly irritating and not a little bit self-promoting. And it's worth noting that a post filled with whining and putting words into other peoples' mouths, despite predictions of getting "modded into oblivion" is actually 3: Insightful as I post this.

    251. Re:Wow. by WillDraven · · Score: 1

      And Islam is taken from your husband. My half sister has a Christian dad, a Jewish mom, and a Muslim husband, so she's all three!

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    252. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Faith.
            1. Confident belief in the truth, value, or trustworthiness of a person, idea, or thing.
            2. Belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence. See synonyms at belief, trust.
            3. Loyalty to a person or thing; allegiance: keeping faith with one's supporters.
            4. often Faith Christianity. The theological virtue defined as secure belief in God and a trusting acceptance of God's will.

      Note point 2. When you say

      These are merely are the markings of those who have failed to have an open mind and apply reason and logic to their faith.

      If you can do that to its logical conclusion and not just to, say, realise it's ok to eat pork now that we have refrigeration, then occams razor will not let you retain belief in any deity.

      So what you really mean is, use enough logic and reason to seem sane enough in society but still maintain core beliefs in defiance of it.

      Note that point 4 is also related to point 2. Following God's will and such. I hope you can understand why now, though it is preferable to not have fundamentalists and fine to have people believe whatever they want as long as you're not forcing me to; there does come a point where we could just say you're not taking the logic thing far enough.

      I don't mean to convince you, just explaining a side.

    253. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ""No one wants to wake up on December 24th to watch their dim witted neighbor's body being carried from the next apartment due to hysteria induced suicide.""

      Says you. seems like thats the exact kind of thing i'd like to see. A real effective solution to a serious problem.

      IF we can get all the stupid folks to off themselves. Then the world really is ending. And we get to build a nice new one with alot less stupid.

      Is that nice to say? hell no. but damm. it would be an effective solution.

    254. Re:Wow. by bjourne · · Score: 1

      And for what reason do we need people like you on this planet?

    255. Re:Wow. by niktemadur · · Score: 1

      Back before we had 200 channels on TV and the Internet most people got their news from one of three networks and or the news paper. The news coverage was limited but they where actually pretty careful to report facts or report nothing at all. A lot of people grew up trusting that if it was on TV that it was based in fact. The downside is that you where limited in what facts you could get without a lot of effort.

      Now we have the Internet and 200 channels of TV. Now a person can find out a huge amount of facts but there is no gatekeeper. With that vast resource of facts comes an even bigger flood of opinion, ego, and fantasy all pretending to be facts.

      Brilliantly put, PP should get modded up. I'd like to just underline a link between both paragraphs, to state the obvious: A lot of people still think that because it's on TV, it's based on fact, are unaware that the gatekeeper has left the building, believe to this day that the 24-hour "news" cycle is still in the tradition and standard of Walter Cronkite.
      The contemporary tabloid-news cacophony didn't happen overnight, I am reminded of the metaphor of the frog in slowly boiling water, unaware that it's in the process of being boiled alive. After the increasingly crass coverage of Bobbitt, Buttafuoco and then OJ Simpson, I said to friends "The noise level is getting unbearable, how can they (the media) possibly turn any more sordid? Who can they possibly exploit next?" As it turned out, Clinton and Lewinsky were right around the corner.

      Then there's the incessant fear mongering flavor of the week,
      When it comes to hyping Niburu and 2012, the majority of the weight can be put squarely on Fart Bell and friends of Coast To Coast, broadcast by, who else, Clear Channel Radio, home of Rush Limbaugh.
      Lest we forget how back in 1996, over the course of several shows with several guests, Bell sensationalized a bit of optical noise behind Comet Hale-Bopp as a UFO, only to packpedal and bowdlerize his indirect but real role as inspiration in the mass suicide event of the Heaven's Gate cult.

      Is non-stop sensationalism what's in store for us, from here to fucking eternity?
      A fitting tag would be The Culture Of McDonald's, thrust aggressively in the faces of TV viewers everywhere, keeping them numb and highly addicted in an intellectually stultifying environment.

      My wife and I, we have a TV and DVD player with neither cable nor satellite, so we only rent what we want to watch (our last big escapade was Battlestar Galactica), while on the internet I limit my daily TV diet to the brilliant deconstructions of The Daily Show.

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
    256. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Living in Amish country, I can attest that a most of them are. A few of them are actually quite intelligent, although they're dramatically handicapped from using that intelligence by the eighth-grade education cap. And a number of those drift to more progressive sects -- I suspect if you could look over several generations, you'd see a gradual exodus of the brighter bulbs.

    257. Re:Wow. by Antity-H · · Score: 1

      You don't get it: cylons have been secretly developped by the US army and are being sent in space as we speak.What do you think was on the shuttle ! Once combined into a mothership they will deflect nibiru and we are all safe... for some time.

    258. Re:Wow. by ildon · · Score: 1
    259. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post is bullshit.

    260. Re:Wow. by marqs · · Score: 1

      Does the Cylon attack come before or after 2012?

      Personally I'm more worried about the Daleks. Been a long time since I saw the doctor... Besides he's probably occupied administering swine flue vaccine at the moment.

    261. Re:Wow. by treeves · · Score: 1

      You certainly have a different definition of 'innocent'.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    262. Re:Wow. by XcepticZP · · Score: 1

      They harm children even less than they do animals, in movies. It's like a really really bad taboo to kill a child in a movie.

      Same goes in games. In Fallout 3, there is a little town, called Lamplight or something, that you have to go through to do a story-required mission. They actively FORCE you not to kill the entire town to get to that one door. I mean, you can kill the entire capital wasteland's human community. But this one little town of a dozen or so brats? Not a chance. And to top it all off, the children really are a bunch of cocky brats that you just want to teach a lesson with a shotgun to their faces. Even if you do change your mind and reload to do their mission non-violently.

    263. Re:Wow. by Philip_the_physicist · · Score: 2, Informative

      Personally, it would be better if they find him on the 21st. The smell might put me off my mince pies.

    264. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The world will end when nobody's expecting it. Obviously, it can't end on December 21, because everybody knows about that. So it has to end at December 20 at the latest. But now we know it can't be December 20., either! So it can't be the 19, so it can't be the 18th... so it can't be tomorrow, meaning the world has already ended and we're in a simulation.

      How's that?

    265. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. A 'thinking' Christian.

      Contradictio in terminis.

    266. Re:Wow. by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      The 99.99% is way off. Look up what is the proportion of adults that believe in the supernatural, there are studies of that. Look up how many people believe that astrology is a part of astronomy and is correct science (well at least as accurate as weather predictions). You live in a country where your former president, elected by a majority of the US population, tried to persuade my president to go into war using the Gog and Magog prophecy as an argument (not as an image, as an argument). The day a figure of authority (a known priest, a politician, or -god forbids- Sarah Palin) begins to believe this shit, there will be millions of followers.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    267. Re:Wow. by stompertje · · Score: 1

      The 'haab' actually has 365 days, it's the 'tun' which only has 360 days. Depends on which of the two you want to call a 'year'.

    268. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The levels of empathy are just overwhelming...

    269. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that's what the suicide offers are for - to reduce the number of stupid people.

      Err... Did you not see that they are talking about killing their children and pets (who are not necessarily stupid and/or deserving of death). And did you consider that most of these people are probably not stupid but have untreated mental illnesses?

    270. Re:Wow. by Canazza · · Score: 1

      it only works for me in FF if I come from the RSS link and not the frontpage.

      for a site designed to attract computer geeks it's not doing too well is it?

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    271. Re:Wow. by rarity · · Score: 1

      Nice. Have you read "Dream of a thousand cats", at all?

      If they had scales and fangs instead of fur and big cute eyes, we'd see the evil little bastards for what they really are...

    272. Re:Wow. by devnulljapan · · Score: 1

      and a subset will tell you that was all about Chernobyl ... although what they won't tell you is that if it's foretold in some book, why didn't they, y'know, tell anyone until afterwards hmmmm? Save a few lives, stop a disaster. These are the same people who see Willy Nelson's face in their toast in the morning. Stupid doesn't begin to describe it.

    273. Re:Wow. by u38cg · · Score: 1
      Oh god how you have shamed me.

      Seriously, we've all tried this once...haven't we? Anybody?

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    274. Re:Wow. by ScreamingCactus · · Score: 1

      You may laugh now, but what will you do when riots break out in 2012? Hollywood is a bunch of Nazis (figuratively speaking). They see fear, and they see profit. They're just cashing in on the game the History Channel has been playing for years. If saying every prophet in the history of the world predicted destruction on 2012 gets you more money, then why not do it, right? Unfortunately, it seems this has gone much farther than the 2000 scare. With so many people freaked out about this whole thing, I think there is real potential for a minor cataclysm in 2012, caused by Hollywood and the television networks themselves. Not the end of the world, but possibly a major blow to civilization.

      And I know it seems ridiculous, but you have to remember: Humans are emotional creatures. Poke their feelings and all logic goes out the window.

      --
      The path to enlightenment is truly through homemade drugs!
    275. Re:Wow. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You need a lucky roll - those scales give a heck of an armour bonus.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    276. Re:Wow. by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      Your lack of compassion in your post is so disturbing I'm hoping you're trolling. Sure, there are stupid people in the world - there are also a lot of vulnerable people. Mental illness is common, people don't always react rationally, and for you to coldly dismiss them as worthless and assume that we should dismiss their suffering and unhappiness with a suggestion that they kill themselves really makes me uncomfortable.

    277. Re:Wow. by shish · · Score: 1

      According to /.ers

      You know that you're a /.er, right?

      Making stupid generalisations about some other group that you don't know about is one thing, but making generalisations about your own group... I don't have the words.

      (Also, I see far more "All of slashdot follows stereotype X, I'm one of the few free-thinkers" than I do people actually following stereotypes, what's up with that? :-/)

      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
    278. Re:Wow. by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      Wormwood ? We're gonna get flooded by Absinthe when the endtimes come ? Damn, dude, count me in. How soon can we get there ?

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    279. Re:Wow. by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      Being in the minority when was the last time someone tried to sue you for observing your faith in public?

      Depending on your faith, how many followers are killed every year for their beliefs? 'google' Christians killed, oh yea, we aren't persecuted at all.

      Yes, it was a whiny post, but there is only so much of a beating you put a foot down, if that is whining then so be it.

      Oddly enough, the mod up actually proves a point, along with the several posts agreeing responding to this thread

      Yes a presidential candidate who isn't christian will have a hard time being elected because a large part of the voting block has a moral compass. If history is an indicator non-religious folk don't do all too well as political leaders.

      Just because someone is in the majority doesn't mean they don't receive persecution.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    280. Re:Wow. by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      Since there are no metrics for slashdot Generalizations are acceptable. But I have spent time noting posts regarding people responding positively to Christian posts vs negatively and the positives are far outweighed by the negatives. Conversely, Mentions of Buddhists are largely positive. How do I measure? In a charged debate I do searches for keywords and check the replies and mods. So yes you could consider it a generalization, but an informed one.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    281. Re:Wow. by Alsee · · Score: 1

      but I think people would assume we were converts instead of just some people who thought he had some good ideas.

      All the better for slipping subversive ideas into their heads.

      For example Jesus was the original advocate for Separation of Church and State.
      Matthew 22:21

      Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    282. Re:Wow. by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      and now for the nominees...

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    283. Re:Wow. by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      Sir, When you have more feelings for an animal than a human being, that is fucked up.

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    284. Re:Wow. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I have cable. I love Wheeler Dealer on DIY, and I watch a good amount of animation.
      Frankly I really miss news. CNN used to be a way to find out what is going on. Now it is all talking heads. It is really terrible that almost everybody has lost the ability to know what are facts and what is opinion. I used to like the Daily Show until he invited a right to lifer on. My opinion on abortion is in the middle and is likely to tick both sides off. I think it should be legal but treated like any other medical procedure. If your under 18 you must get your parents permission.
      How ever this gentleman wrote a book about why he felt abortion was wrong. Stewart was freaking foaming at the mouth claiming that this guy was pro rape and implied not allowing a woman to get an abortion was the same as committing rape!
      The author of the book was polite and well spoken. At that point I realized that Stewart was also just a talking head. He really was no different that Rush except that I tended to agree with him more. That made him all the more dangerous. It is sad because I really did enjoy him. It was like the last of my innocence leaving.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    285. Re:Wow. by spun · · Score: 1

      Christians aren't excluded from academia. If I saw anyone berated for their beliefs in a classroom, I'd complain. Trying to parse your 'Christian Science teacher' sentence, uh, a science teacher who is a member of Christian Scientists, or a science teacher who is Christian? My grandmother was a Christian Scientist, and a teacher. Maybe things have changed from her day?

      I don't know, I just don't see this persecution you're afraid of. America is a Christian Nation, and outside of a few big cities, I bet I get more hell for being an atheist than you've ever gotten for being a Christian. You still HAVE to profess to be Christian to get elected almost anywhere in the US. It helps you get jobs, too.

      As for Christians being killed for their faith every day, I'm going to have to go with 'You're delusional' on that one, sorry.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    286. Re:Wow. by LtGordon · · Score: 1

      Next thing we will have 10foot disclaimers on the entrance to cinemas telling the dumb masses that its just pretend.

      We already do. Stick around and watch the credits after the movie all the way through. I work at a theater and some of the legal disclaimers are kind of ridiculous already.

      Really? Zombieland is entirely fictional and any similarities to any actual event or persons are entirely coincidental? ... Really?

    287. Re:Wow. by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      How do you know, beyond all doubt, that you've isolated something beyond external influence?

      You don't. There is always room for doubt. You do your best to isolate every variable that you can and then you critically analyze the results to look for indications of flaws. One of the purposes of the control is to detect bias in the experiment which would indicate a flaw.

      Flaws can exist that don't show up in the comparison of the control and experimental sets, which is why it's so important that experiments are reproduced and the results are validated and refined by other researchers.

      Quantum mechanics continuously reveals examples of counter-intuitive and unbelievable behavior. What seems irrational now may later be proven true. All I'm saying is that it's foolish to be so sure of "the way things are" that one mocks and disregards ideas that seem to go against one's understanding of reality.

      There's a difference between something that "seems irrational" and something that is "demonstrably irrational". "Seems irrational" is merely a synonym for "misunderstood" or "counter-intuitive". "Demonstrably irrational" means that unless the premise set is changed, the conclusion does not follow. Even if the conclusion happens to be true, if it was incorrectly arrived at, then the line of reasoning should still be criticized.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    288. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Absinthe laws in the United States were repealed a few decades ago. In fact, there are companies who manufacture and sell it over the internet.

    289. Re:Wow. by mog007 · · Score: 1

      I'd be interested to know how many atheists in the U.S. were former believers. I'll bet most atheists used to believe in a deity at some point in their life.

    290. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, the government is Nibiru.

    291. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see... they reject vaccination for their children, electricity which would make their work a hell of a lot easier, and the combustion engine which would make plowing and tilling their fields an eight hour a day job, instead of the twelve or fourteen hours they spend now.

      With that much extra free time they could relax a little.

    292. Re:Wow. by TheLink · · Score: 1

      > there is no rational in believing in any God,

      Actually the placebo effect is scientifically proven to work well for "fixing" all sorts of problems on a significant proportion of humans. Even better than drugs in some cases (popular real painkillers cannot be used on burn victims if they also have breathing difficulties).

      So it is logical that even if God (or gods) doesn't exist, groups that believe in a God who can and will help them, will have at least one advantage over groups that don't.

      Because that group's members would be better able to take advantage of the placebo effect - no need for a physical "sugar pill", and someone _else_ to administer it. For example: a badly injured member in severe pain, might pray and obtain pain relief, and then be able to extend his usefulness to the group.

      The group may have disadvantages too depending on the overall belief system, but there could also be other advantages.

      For example, if the belief system encourages members to be more prone to beneficial out-of-character behaviours then that group could have better survival fitness. It doesn't have to be 100%, just a statistically significant bias may be good enough over generations.

      Lastly, atheists are not immune to delusions and irrationality. After all many of them like to quote: "But for good people to do evil things, it takes religion." which is clearly incorrect[1].

      That delusion may give those atheists a feeling of superiority, which might provide some advantages I guess. But are they going to find it as easy to "self administer" the placebo effect?

      [1] Communism isn't a religion, and there was the infamous "stanford prison experiment". And if one considers Communism/"I Was Following Orders" a religion you could consider any belief system or ideology as a religion. On the other hand, if the conclusion is "most people aren't good", and they mainly just conform or follow orders, then a suitable belief system would be useful for improving the statistics right?

      --
    293. Re:Wow. by MattSausage · · Score: 0

      I daresay people's anthropomorphizing and self-indentification with their pets is MUCH higher now than in the 50's. And the farther back you go, the less animals lives mean to the average human. I'm sure that has to do with dogs and cats often being 'work' animals in rural communities, and often pests in cities... I'm guessing as people started having fewer children their pets became more important. I know I don't have kids and at 32 I would seriously consider beating anyone within an inch of their lives who killed my doberman with intent.

      I wuv my widdle doggie.

    294. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes a presidential candidate who isn't christian will have a hard time being elected because a large part of the voting block has a moral compass.

      If you just implied that I as an atheist have no moral compass then you can suck my dick.

      If history is an indicator non-religious folk don't do all too well as political leaders.

      And if history is an indicator religious folk don't do all too well as political leaders, m'kay?

    295. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try to support this lie you told..You won't, of course. Because you can't. And you know it.

      You're telling another lie right now by trying to pretend you're not shrieking like a little bitch at having your own dishonesty shoved in your face. You are doing that, and everyone who reads your comments knows it.

    296. Re:Wow. by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      I have it on Presidential authority that the actual phrase is :

      "Fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again."

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    297. Re:Wow. by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      Yes a science teacher who is Christian. Christians aren't excluded from academia, that would be illegal. However, they are not taken seriously, I can speak first hand here, and we live in the midwest.

      Yes we are still a christian nation for the most part but people are working very hard to get freedom from religion. www.ffrf.org Our nation was founded using Christian principles and it worked really well. We have a lot of very progressive groups working to undo that.

      As for Christians being killed for their faith every day, I'm going to have to go with 'You're delusional' on that one, sorry

      believe what you want on this one, whereas in the US we don't see as high of a death toll, the world begs to differ, google "Christians Killed", or "Christian Persecution". Or just do some research on Sudan.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    298. Re:Wow. by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      Actually religious leaders have a pretty good track record. Yes there has been some fallout from some famous individuals but when taken in context of all the religious leaders there have been, looks pretty good. That being said I am still a big supporter of separation of church and state.

      No I wasn't implying that as an atheist you have no moral compass, bit of a catchphrase I used there. But people tend to vote for the individuals who are in line with their thought processes, Christian leaders have proven to be effective and caring. There isn't much precedent for other leaders so we stick with what we know.

      My beef with atheists (not agnostics), is the simple concept that they are ruling out all possibility for Diety, something that is improvable. I respect the agnostic "I don't know but I don't preclude possibility", but the atheist is believing something just as 'irrational' as the people they oppose on the same grounds. Even the atheist response to Pascal's wager takes into consideration that there may be a God. However, it has been my experience that depending on the athiest or christian, it depends on the person's personality and character, I have seen some very immoral Christians and very moral athiests.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    299. Re:Wow. by spun · · Score: 1

      whereas in the US we don't see as high of a death toll,

      AS HIGH?!?! You believe ANY US citizens are being killed for being Christian?

      Now I actually pity you.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    300. Re:Wow. by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      Oops, I mean unprovable not improvable...damn spell check.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    301. Re:Wow. by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      Yes, It is too bad you dont know how to use google. Now I pity your ignorance. Try googling "Christians killed by Muslims in the US". Of course it goes much higher when you look at muslim->Christian converts, or the bickering between mormons and Christians but those are all speculation.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    302. Re:Wow. by spun · · Score: 1

      I did waste my time googling "Christians Killed", and found NOTHING like what you say. No American citizens have ever been killed for being Christian.

      The ONE case I found, from DECADES ago, was a string of racially motivated, black on white murders. It had nothing to do with religion.

      This nation is dominated and owned by Christians. The vast majority of citizens are Christian. Almost all government officials are Christian. Almost all business leaders are Christian. Our laws, from marriage laws to blue laws, are Christian. The idea that the dominant religious group in America is somehow persecuted is beyond ludicrous.

      I'm guessing you get some kind of sick thrill out of your feelings of persecution, as if being a persecuted Christian makes you some kind of brave spiritual warrior, akin to the ancient Roman martyrs.

      You aren't.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    303. Re:Wow. by MattSausage · · Score: 0

      FYI, canines are technically omnivores. They don't eat much vegetation. But they do need some. Cats are pure carnivores.

    304. Re:Wow. by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      Dude calm down.

      The "as high" phrase was the thing you chose to pick on from my post, and ignored my other points. Christians have died in the US for their religion, there just haven't been very many. But the point of the original post was just to show that persecution of Christians exists in the world. Yes as my point was made above you can be in the majority and still be discriminated against, there is even a term for it; reverse discrimination.

      Im not saying nor have I said that I get whipped, jailed, or tortured for being a Christian. I am glad that in the US I can be a Christian and not fear for my life. The downsides right now are just political. We do see in the US, a large overturning of anything related to Christianity in the Gov't. The ACLU spends a large amount of its time fighting these battles, in fact there is a prominent organization called the ACLJ that popped up just to balance the scales. This is however, how it starts in countries where Muslims and Jews have been heavily persecuted.

      However, I feel that you are more intent in proving me wrong at this point than having a discussion over what I have said so I will stop here.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    305. Re:Wow. by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      I'd just like to point out... this stuff was written from the perspective of people who lived 2000+ years ago. To them, any bright object in the sky would be a star. So when you see the word star, don't think huge unshielded fusion reactor... think comet or meteor. I think everyone here would agree that it's definitely within the realm of possibility that a largish rock could burn brightly through the atmosphere and then fall into the ocean and ruin everyone's day.

      The book of Daniel talks about eagles with the hearts of men. Sounds like an F-15 to me. Even an apache helicopter could look like the locust/scorpion combo in the book of revelations. I don't claim to be an expert on this stuff or even right when it comes to bible prophecy. But I find it ironic that a christian is telling the non-christians to have an open mind.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    306. Re:Wow. by spun · · Score: 1

      I'm intent on proving you wrong in one regard only: the persecution of Christians. I personally have nothing against Christians, and quite respect the vast majority of you folks who just try to live by Christ's teachings.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    307. Re:Wow. by Sarlin · · Score: 1

      I love Absinthe mixed with Jaeger. Mmmmm. Funny thing this television I can type on...

      --
      The Thing is.
    308. Re:Wow. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      From an AC. Oh, the irony. Go to Rodney King and tell him it was a lie. I'm sure Ian Tomlinson would also agree that cops are all perfect. If you're a cop, I pity the people where you live. You deserve locking up more than 99% of inmates.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    309. Re:Wow. by Darby · · Score: 1

      Dude this is slashdot, if you mention Christianity the readers just substitute "ignorant masses".

      That has nothing to do with slashdot, it's just reality. There are a large mass of Christians and they are obviously deeply ignorant..if they weren't they wouldn't believe such thoroughly debunked bullshit. It's just what those words mean, try not to take it so personally. There are a lare mass of Christians all of whom are deeply ignorant by the very definition of Christian hence "ignorant masses" is a 100% accurate description.

      It is the fad of our culture right now to Christian bash,

      Wow. It has always been the rule that the more intelligent members of a society are far less likely to buy into idiotic lies and believe in really stupid fairy tales. It has nothing to do with a fad. This is how the world has always worked. Since religion has been forced by the forces of liberal secularism to give up it's brutal, disgusting stranglehold on society Christians have been largely unable to pursue the disgusting parts of their faith like torture and murder of the innocent and intelligent. That's the reason you see more intelligent, sane people pointing out the obvious bullshit that is your religion as it is all religion. Again, nothing to do with fads, it's progress and all for the good.

      after all they are not as good as the rest of humanity, they are just silly ignorant people who are a plague on society that need to be dealt with.

      More they are victims of their parents own disgusting ignorance and cowardice, but essentially you've nailed it. They are the bottom of the barrel of our society. Hell look at their rabid hate driven assaults on gay rights. If they were even decent Americans they'd have the basic common sense to understand there isn't a damn thing in the world that gives them any right at all to say what other people can do. Since they rabidly despise America, they're happy to do everything in their power to destroy every decent thing it ever stood for in order to spread the deeply vile and disgusting lie that America was founded on their disgusting delusions.

      They could go away, STFU sand leave decent people alone, but they don't. They lie outrageously and try and shove their shit into decent society. They are a plague through their own disgusting hatred and contempt of decent people.

      According to /.ers there is no rational in believing in any God, but it is ok to say you are part of any religion as long as it isn't one related to Judaism.

      No, according to *reality* there is no rational reason to believe in any god. This, again, has nothing to do with slashdot and is just the nature of reality. If you have a problem with the 100% proven fact that there does not exist one single rational justification for believing in some idiotic fairy tale, then the only person you have to blame is god....too bad there isn't one.

      It is also rational to know without a doubt that there is no God.

      This is a very common lie told by all you Christian douchebag liars.
      Is there any evidence at all for any god? No. So it's not anything at all like you're looking at 2 sides of an issue. With no evidence for a god, it's stupid to think that some dumb fairy tale made up by some ignorant nomads is magically true. And we *know* with 100% certainty that your god is nothing but a fairy tale made up by ignorant nomads.
      The god of deism might exist but that's worth nothing since he made the universe then disappeared never to be seen again. Your specific god is obviously made up and it's idiotic to believe that a known made up fairy tale is true becasue you really really are too much of a weak willed douche to deal with the real world.

      On a brighter side it is good to see another rational christian on these forums and that I am not alone.

      Yet another lie out of you supposed moral shitbags. It is not possible for you to be rational and a Christian. Rationality would prove to you quite easily that Christianity is made up bullshit if you had to courage to address that question rationally. You don't though, so you lie about it. That's deeply disgusting.

    310. Re:Wow. by Darby · · Score: 1

      I am pretty sure there are plenty of us who believe in Christ and in science at the same time.

      No, there really aren't. What you're doing is compartmentalising. You're capable of thinking rationally about other subjects, but you are not even capable of applying rational thinking to Christianity because believing in fairy tales is entirely incompatible with rational thinking.

      We know your god was made up by people. We know this with 100% certainty. How do we know this? Well one simple obviosu way to know this for sure is to pull your head out of your ass long enough to look at a timeline. The pyramids were built long before there was a Hebrew tribe, hence the god that the Hebrews made up could not possibly have existed before the people who invented it.

      So, no, you are not a rational person. You're a person who can think rationally on some topics, but quite obviously is not able to to do that regarding religion and *your* religion most specifically.

      Sorry, bub, but the only rational conclusion it is possible to come to regarding your god and your religion is that it was all made up. If you reach any other conclusion it is 100% due to you being irrational and desperate to believe some batshit insane idiotic nonsense. That is a trivial statement to defend against every attack that's ever been leveled against it and you would already know this if you were capable of thinking rationally on this topic.

      That's reality. Please grow up and deal with it as a sane person instead of demanding that magical fairys magically come into existence becasue you really really want them to. That's not at all rational as you would know quite well already were you even capable of thinking rationally about your irrational delusions.

    311. Re:Wow. by Darby · · Score: 1


      I do believe that a guy named Jesus Christ (or whatever it was in the native tongue of the time) existed.

      You do know that that is a completely irrational article of faith with no evidence whatsoever for it, right?

      You do know, don't you, that the early Christians who made up the fairy tales about Jesus didn't believe he was an actual person who ever lived, right? They thought the whole birth death and resurrection was purely metaphysical and only ever happened in a spiritual plane.
      No *real* Christians have ever believed that Jesus ever lived, only the newbie psuedo-Christian scumbag liars even believe that hogwash.

      I mean, do you not believe in Oz, but still think there's a talking tin man walking around looking for a brain? You believing in a physical Jesus without while having the basic common sense not to swallow the whole bullshit story is comparable to that....

      The whole Jesus was an actual person fairy tale was invented hundreds of years later than the supposed events...which events there is also no record of whatsoever.

      Now, if you haven't just blindly swallowed the whole silly fairy tale, how is it that you think one part (and one of the most thoroughly falsified parts at that) of the fairy tale is magically true is spite of all the evidence?

    312. Re:Wow. by Darby · · Score: 1

      Yes a presidential candidate who isn't christian will have a hard time being elected because a large part of the voting block has a moral compass.

      Wow, you're a real fucking scumbag, you know that?
      Dumb as a fucking post as well...or a deeply dishonest liar...hard to tell which.

      You do know that you just stated that Christians have moral compasses and non-Christians do not.

      Are you so stupid that you don't know that you're lying quite blatantly about something really obvious...that would be *really* stupid.
      *or*
      Are you so deeply and disgustingly dishonest that you feel no shame for telling a lie so blatantand disgusting?

      Either way, it's certain that you are a fucking scumbag.

      It's clear that Christians do not vote based on morality, quite the contrary as is evident to any sane person.
      I mean, Bush was elected by Christian scum based on his stated Christianity yet morals and ethics nosedived in this country spear headed by the fucking Christian scum.

      So rabid, ignorant hatred of gays is what Christians vote on, not morals. The moral path would be to stay the fuck out of people's way since Christofascist fucks have no right whatsoever to say who does or does not get married to whom. Since they have no fucking morals whatsoever (they wouldn't need religion if they had a healthy moral compass in the first place like sane people do) they think they can go around shoving their vile purely evil hatred of decent people down the throats of their betters.

      Fuck off you scumbag piece of shit immoral liar.
      Seriously, you are deeply fucking vile as you proved here beyond any reasonable doubt.

       

    313. Re:Wow. by Darby · · Score: 1

      However, they are not taken seriously, I can speak first hand here, and we live in the midwest.

      Of course not, nor should they be. "Magical fairies did it" is never an answer that a sane person would take seriously.

      Yes we are still a christian nation for the most part but people are working very hard to get freedom from religion.

      No, America has *never* been a christian nation. It was founded on Liberal secularism. That was very mu ch intentional on the part of the framers of this nation. They knew they weren't making a christian nation *on purpose* you ignorant lying little shit. Those are some very good, smart moral and ethical people you're grossly insulting like that you whiny lying little bitch.
      Nobody would have called this a free country if it was founded on Christian principles. Christian nations are brutal vile and nowhere any decent person would ever want to live.

      Our nation was founded using Christian principles and it worked really well. We have a lot of very progressive groups working to undo that.

      You are a fucking liar. It was founded on the philosophy of *Liberalism* you lying little shitbag. They were very careful not to allow any religious bullshit into the founding documents of the first nation ever constructed using human reason and Liberal philosophy.

      You are deeply insulting every single person who ever gave a shit about this country, you are doing it by attacking the great men who founded this nation with deeply disgusting insults and while showing your complete ignorance of history and revealing the fact that you've obviously never even read the Constitution.

      Typical of your breed. You lie through your teeth while claiming moral superiority.

      Go die in a fire you rabidly anti-American Christofascist lying fuckwad.

    314. Re:Wow. by WillDraven · · Score: 1

      I poorly chose my words. I didn't mean 'believe' in the sense of having complete faith that its true, more along the lines of 'I will accept that it is within the realm of possibility, and grant the assumption of truth for the purpose of amicable conversation with others (especially true believers) when discussing the ideas attributed to him.

      I'm perfectly willing to accept the possibility of him never existing as a real corporeal person, however I felt explaining such would of dragged out an already wordy post and detracted from my main point, which was: Most of the rules for living in the bible were good at the time, and many continue to be good today. If we could just trim out all the unnecessary nonsensical magic (and maybe replace it with science) it makes a great guide for living to better your community.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    315. Re:Wow. by Darby · · Score: 1

      Ahh, ok, makes sense.

      Thanks for explaining.

    316. Re:Wow. by WNight · · Score: 1

      Religion is far from having the 'corner' on bad ideas and what you call 'bullshit'.

      Yes, but it's organized. Stupid usually comes in individually-sized packets.

      I am getting very tired of this kind of blanket Slashdot condemnation of 'religion'

      Has it occurred to you that we're just as sick of you? No matter how many times someone explains how stupid religion is there's another of you, claiming that this type of stupid is special and we need to respect it. As if Flat-Earthers got uppity.

      (which one by the way? There's thousands including Judaism, Hinduism, Sekes and other favorites of 'progressives') as being for only the brain-dead.

      Which ones don't involve faith? Those are the ones that aren't harmful. Every other religion is worthless, even if new-agers like it.

      But even science makes just as many mistakes.

      Here's where you go far off the deep end. Science itself can't make mistakes. Sure, people do often believe untested hypotheses but that's not science making them do that, that's whatever makes you believe in a god.

      It learns from them and goes on. Just as many religions have too.

      So much for the word of god. Turns out he thought the sun rotated around the Earth. Revise, revise, re-invent.

      Or perhaps I should keep bringing up the mistakes of science every time you want to make a point and then blanketly call all scientists idiots and those that follow what they've done as mindless drones spewing the results of studies they didn't even do themselves.

      Oh no! If Einstein was wrong about something else, maybe he was wrong about everything!? Maybe we shouldn't have just taken his word. Oh, wait, we didn't.

      It's not a popularity game.

    317. Re:Wow. by WNight · · Score: 1

      The scientific method is a belief system.

      Is a ruler a belief system? Are chin-ups a belief system?

      I think it's a tool. A software tool, to be precise.

      It is the belief that I can presume a falsifiable theory to be true until it is proven false.

      No, it's that fact that falsified theories have inconsistencies.

      You shouldn't believe or presume anything, you merely go about using (testing) the theory until it's wrong.

      You don't have to believe your ruler is correct, you can use it regardless, check its consistency, operate on the assumptions that it is not correct, etc.

    318. Re:Wow. by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      "God wills it" doesn't satisfy "explain the data".

    319. Re:Wow. by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      These aren't the markings of a religious person or mainstream religion in general and it is dishonest to attribute these kinds of things to everyone who is religious .

      But there are still beliefs that are mainstream, and still fall under what the OP was talking about - e.g.:

      Belief that Jesus was God, resulted from a virgin birth, and rose from the dead.
      Belief in a being that talks to them, and can answer their prayers.
      Belief that they'll go to heaven if they accept Jesus.

    320. Re:Wow. by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      You believe in science, and you believe that people can have virgin births, have magic powers, and rise from the dead. Right.

      I'm pretty sure there are plenty of us who believe in fairies and science at the same time. And then there are those who believe in magic and science at the same time. And those who believe in Creationism and science at the same time.

    321. Re:Wow. by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      I find it quite sad that addressing the ridiculous nature of religion is "trolling", but addressing the ridiculous nature of the 2012 apocalypse is not.

    322. Re:Wow. by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Try walking into a science department in any University and profess to be a Christian, you would be lucky to graduate. Try being a Christian Science teacher who defends the theories of evolution, you would be lucky to get the job. This is where it starts, Christians are killed around the world every day for their faith, when was the last time you saw it in the news?

      Citations for all of these? Or are they just yet more things you believe through "faith" rather than evidence?

      Christians spend billions bringing healthcare and food to the nations, when was the last time anyone talked about that?

      I'm confused - people of all and no religions do this, why do Christians deserve special mention?

      you never feel the need to defend a christian who is being berated in a classroom because....it is socially acceptable.

      Because I've never seen it happen. Here in the UK however, it's a legal requirement to preach Christianity in all schools (even state schools). Nevermind playground namecalling from other kids, we're talking about state-enforced pressure against non-Christians from figures of authority.

      And also from my UK perspective - and what I've seen of the US too - if anything, the media is overall biased in favour of Christianity. E.g., consider how often it is that someone is referred to as a "churchgoer" or "having faith" in order to make them look good. And many tabloids constantly whine about how terrible things allegedly are for Christians (and much like you, they provide no evidence to back their claims, instead relying on anecdotes and myths).

    323. Re:Wow. by jbezorg · · Score: 1

      Damn the facts, full steam ahead.

      --
      I've lost all my marbles except one & It's fun to test angular & centripetal acceleration in my skull
    324. Re:Wow. by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Being in the minority when was the last time someone tried to sue you for observing your faith in public?

      When was the last time you were sued?

      Depending on your faith, how many followers are killed every year for their beliefs? 'google' Christians killed, oh yea, we aren't persecuted at all.

      The links I find show Christians being killed by Muslims - so yeah, religious people killing each other over their beliefs, that's hardly a ringing endorsement for religion, is it?

      Furthermore, those links talk about other countries, so why does that cause you fear in the US?

      Yes a presidential candidate who isn't christian will have a hard time being elected because a large part of the voting block has a moral compass.

      Aha here we are - you claim non-Christians are immoral, and shouldn't be President, and you have the cheek to whine about you being oppressed?

      If history is an indicator non-religious folk don't do all too well as political leaders.

      Citation?

    325. Re:Wow. by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      They may be benefits for some people to believe in bullshit, but that doesn't stop it being bullshit.

      Communism isn't a religion, and there was the infamous "stanford prison experiment".

      How does that disprove the quote? It doesn't imply that religion is the only thing that cause make people do evil things.

      And it's only a saying, it's not meant to be a system of belief that people hold(!)

    326. Re:Wow. by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      And then there are those who believe in magic and science at the same time.

      Well, that depends on what one means by "magic". (And by "believe", I suppose.)

      Obviously one can believe that the David Copperfield, stage magic variety sort of magic exists, and also believe in science.

      It's also possible to "believe" in ceremonial magic of the Crowley sort, and also believe in science. Before he went bonkers with his Thelma nonsense, Crowley and his mentor MacGregor Mathers wrote in a preface to their version of The Lesser Key of Solomon of their understanding of magic as a psychological art:

      ...What is the cause of my illusion of seeing a spirit in the triangle of Art?

      Every smatterer, every expert in psychology, will answer: "That cause lies in your brain."

      ...

      The spirits of the Goetia are portions of the human brain.

      ...

      If, then, I say, with Solomon:

      "The Spirit Cimieries teaches logic," what I mean is:

      "Those portions of my brain which subserve the logical faculty may be stimulated and developed by following out the processes called 'The Invocation of Cimieries.'"

      ...

      ...There is no effect which is truly and necessarily miraculous.

      Our Ceremonial Magic fines down, then, to a series of minute, though of course empirical, physiological experiments, and whoso, will carry them through intelligently need not fear the result.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    327. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From an AC. Oh, the irony.

      There's nothing ironic, or even relevant, about the fact that I'm posting anonymously. You know that, and so by pretending that it's so, you're lying again.

      Go to Rodney King and tell him it was a lie. I'm sure Ian Tomlinson would also agree that cops are all perfect.

      I never said or implied that "cops are all perfect". That's yet another lie. You know that you can't refute what I actually said, so you instead make up something and pretend I said that instead. By doing so you scream at the top of your lungs that you know you're completely wrong.

      If you're a cop, I pity the people where you live. You deserve locking up more than 99% of inmates.

      You say I should be locked up solely because I called you out as the lying scumbag we both know you are. You literally want it to be illegal to contradict you. That is the ONLY possible reason you would have said that, and saying it proves beyond all possible doubt that you are a hundred times worse than even the caricatures you pretend all cops to be.

    328. Re:Wow. by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Our nation was founded using Christian principles and it worked really well.

      No, in fact, it wasn't. Regarding the "Founding Fathers", many of the founders were Deists. Franklin doubted the divinity of Jesus. Jefferson composed his own edition of the Bible with all the miracle stories elided. Tom Paine wrote that "Except in the first article in the Christian creed, that of believing in God, there is not an article in it but fills the mind with doubt as to the truth of it, the instant man begins to think."

      As for the nation's founding documents, the Constitution states in Article VI that "no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States". Then there's Amendment I's guarantee against establishment of religion.

      And the Treaty of Tripoli -- one of the first treaties negotiated by the United States, created during the Washington administration and signed by John Adams -- explicitly states that "the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion".

      The claim that the U.S. was founded on Christianity is, simply, wrong.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    329. Re:Wow. by sakasune · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid of Sarah Palin getting elected in 2012...or ever.

      --
      "You're arguing for a universe with fewer waffles in it," I said. "I'm prepared to call that cowardice."
    330. Re:Wow. by greycortex · · Score: 1

      No, I bought it because I liked the flavour, didn't feel like death, and liked the label.

    331. Re:Wow. by mpfife · · Score: 1

      I wasn't arguing about social power - I was making a point that the scientific method doesn't always produce the correct results every time either. It is a *process* - and one that has made mistakes (just as all human institutions) and learned from them. I studied in a seminary for several years, and it was NEVER implied that they 'got together' and arranged anything. The thing I was taught was to definitely question and use critical thinking at all times in your faith life. That's the beauty of universal truth - that it is true whether you believe it or not. Our actions have imperical reactions with others - and there are better and worse ways of doing things. Faith is that one trusts that there is this wisdom in the actions promoted by their church - but one must be smart about their application. I was taught that anyone that 'blindly' follows is NOT genuinely participating in their faith. And this was a Catholic seminary. And lest you think I'm some 'moron' I have a degree in Computer Science, and was a core developer on several apps that I am quite sure you have installed on your machine right now.

    332. Re:Wow. by mpfife · · Score: 1

      Has it occurred to you that we're just as sick of you? No matter how many times someone explains how stupid religion is there's another of you, claiming that this type of stupid is special and we need to respect it. As if Flat-Earthers got uppity.

      I don't think my email claimed you needed any kind of special consideration for me or my ideas. I was simply pointing out when you lump hundreds of millions of people together and simply call them 'idiots' - that you might come off as being a bit biased in your judgement. You're entitled to your opinion - but you're not very convincing.

      Which ones don't involve faith? Those are the ones that aren't harmful. Every other religion is worthless, even if new-agers like it.

      You honestly don't think you take anything on faith yourself? Everything you believe you have tested yourself? Quantum mechanics, astrophysics, mathematics, whether the bank really has the money you put in it? All of those are things you were told and you're taking on 'faith' if I'm not mistaken... Unless you've gone and verified it yourself.

      But even science makes just as many mistakes.

      Here's where you go far off the deep end. Science itself can't make mistakes. Sure, people do often believe untested hypotheses but that's not science making them do that, that's whatever makes you believe in a god.

      I agree - I wasn't being clear. You're right in saying that science itself is simply a process of deducing truth. I should have said that things pursued by science do not always result in the correct answer. The history of physics alone has seen a great evolution from Greek causation to Newtonian to Einsteinian/quantum mechanics. There's like to be many more.

      It learns from them and goes on. Just as many religions have too.

      So much for the word of god. Turns out he thought the sun rotated around the Earth. Revise, revise, re-invent.

      You should be very careful about your facts and the context in which they came from. It was long thought the sun rotated around the earth long before religion picked it up. Religion (at least the Catholic faith) has learned that the realm of scientific discovery is left best to science. It's come out against intelligent design, has supported evolution as a valid theory, and that life on other planets isn't any issue.

      This is what I was getting too. It doesn't seem you're very informed on what some of these 'idiots' have been saying. Instead, you seem more than happy to call up something from the early 100's AD and blanket-discount anything they might have to say.

      I was trying to make the point that when you do that, you sound as foolish as those you're trying to discount. Anyone can look at our pasts and see our mistakes. Do you want to keep holding on to the ones of the past as a weapon against people in the now that DON'T believe those things anymore?

      Oh no! If Einstein was wrong about something else, maybe he was wrong about everything!? Maybe we shouldn't have just taken his word. Oh, wait, we didn't.

      I wasn't advocating throwing the baby out with the bath-water. But you were. Religion=idiots= throw anything they have to say about the value of life and human existance because they made a common mistake 1600 years ago about how the cosmos was laid out. And lest you believe I'm advocating mindlessness - I love science. Heck, I got my degree in Computer Science. I love watching the latest shows on Discovery, Nova, and so forth. I don't see faith and reason as at all in conflict with each other. They go hand in hand informing us all along the way. Science without an understanding of human value is just as deadly as faith without reason.

    333. Re:Wow. by ultranova · · Score: 1

      You certainly have a different definition of 'innocent'.

      Innocent: someone who doesn't know good or evil. Often also implies lack of sexuality, at least in more repressed cultures.

      The problems start when people confuse that with a condition where you do know good and evil but restrain yourself from the latter. Children won't avoid doing something because they think it's morally wrong; they are innocent, so they don't understand the concept. That's why they can be unbelievably cruel with a clear conscience.

      A better word children migh be "amoral".

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    334. Re:Wow. by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      I didnt say Christianity nor that the founding fathers were christian, just that they used Christian principles. They used several other structures as well but the Christian and Jewish law are very prominent in the constitution. I do agree with you, there are a large number of people who confuse the two.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    335. Re:Wow. by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      If you wish to debate that topic then I am more than happy to, I just had to make sure this wasn't going to be one of those discussions that degrade into a grammar battle :)

      But for entertainment sake check the vehement opposition from this post:

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1447230&cid=30149392

      Those are the debates I am trying to avoid nothing to be gained by either party there.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    336. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, no

    337. Re:Wow. by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

      ditto, I have little sympathy for idiots taking themselves out of the gene pool. If only we could sterilize felons as standard practice that would take care of a fair bit of the passing on of stupid.

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    338. Re:Wow. by treeves · · Score: 1

      True enough. For some reason I was thinking of the definition where innocent==not having committed evil, like 'not guilty' in the legal sense (w/o the possibility of not guilty by virtue of technicalities, etc.) I do think you are generous with your description of children being capable of great evil w/o any conscience. I happen to believe that children, in general, once they understand they are not the only person who exists, are perfectly capable of understanding right from wrong, and if they don't, their parents have failed.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    339. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this close enough?

      "And the third angel sounded, and there fell a great star from heaven, burning as it were a lamp, and it fell upon the third part of the rivers, and upon the fountains of waters; And the name of the star is called Wormwood: and the third part of the waters became wormwood; and many men died of the waters, because they were made bitter." (Revelation 8:10, 11 - KJB).

      Reference Sumerians..................> the bullshit out there

    340. Re:Wow. by WNight · · Score: 1

      I was simply pointing out when you lump hundreds of millions of people together and simply call them 'idiots' - that you might come off as being a bit biased in your judgement.

      I'm comfortable calling them all idiots individually if needed.

      You've said the equivalent of "But so many people drive while on the cell-phone, it's unlikely they're all idiots." That's faulty logic. I'm grouping people by similar actions/beliefs, thus they're more likely to share other common traits.

      You're entitled to your opinion - but you're not very convincing.

      To you.

      You're right in saying that science itself is simply a process of deducing truth. I should have said that things pursued by science do not always result in the correct answer. The history of physics alone has seen a great evolution from Greek causation to Newtonian to Einsteinian/quantum mechanics. There's like to be many more.

      It learns from them and goes on. Just as many religions have too.

      It's the personification of science that you're making a mistake in. It does not learn, it is never right, or wrong. It simply is.

      You're also wrong is saying religions learn. First, they're supposedly the word of god. For them to change is to mark themselves as obvious fakes as god wouldn't need to change his view of the world. He'd have used terms in his works that he knew wouldn't mislead (ie, earth revolving around the sun) even if people didn't fully understand it currently. Omnipotence is like that.

      Religious organization do learn to lie better (incorporate observed facts into their stories) but that's not learning, per se, as they'd incorporate anything widely believed.

      You should be very careful about your facts and the context in which they came from.

      Oh I am. The catholic church maintains that their rules/etc come from god, and the pope who (when convenient) speaks with the voice of god.

      So when they're wrong, they're absolutely 100% wrong till the end of time. To be right they'd have to admit some of their lies, not merely adjust them to comply with trivially observable physical phenomenon.

      This is what I was getting too. It doesn't seem you're very informed on what some of these 'idiots' have been saying. Instead, you seem more than happy to call up something from the early 100's AD and blanket-discount anything they might have to say.

      Duh, I don't care if the pope himself if hugely insightful in some area, he's carrying the burden of thousands of years of torture and lies in god's name. Until he steps up and admits his imaginary friend isn't actually there it's just another layer of whitewash.

      They're led by omnipotent god. Any mistakes are obviously too many.

      I was trying to make the point that when you do that, you sound as foolish as those you're trying to discount.

      Nope. Only to you and the others who don't get it. If you think 'right' is a popularity game then sure, minority opinions like mine will always seem wrong.

      Anyone can look at our pasts and see our mistakes.

      Quoting the word of god was a mistake? Because the word itself certainly couldn't be.

      Do you want to keep holding on to the ones of the past as a weapon against people in the now that DON'T believe those things anymore?

      Don't believe what? That god is omnipotent, or that the pope speaks for him?

      Or a couple of specifics about orbital mechanics?

      I think you'll find that the majority of believers will now simply believe the new lies and be no closer to actually thinking for themselves.

      Religion=idiots= throw anything they have to say about the value of life and human existance

      It's depressing talking to someone like you. Your tricks (redefining this away from scientific fact to 'life and human existance') are sha

    341. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, that verse may have been fulfilled in 1986, as wormwood (the plant) is named "tchernobyl" in Czech.

      Chapter 8 of a book that counts 22 chapters. Hardly TEOTWAWKI...

  2. Point proven by war4peace · · Score: 1

    This whole thing proves that this world is big enough for everyone. Including total retards.
    I just wonder how the hell did some of these people reach adulthood. A mistery that is deemed to remain unsolved.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    1. Re:Point proven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      mistery

      Oh, the irony.

    2. Re:Point proven by commodore64_love · · Score: 0, Troll

      >>>I just wonder how the hell did some of these people reach adulthood

      Government took care of them. (1) School (babysitter). (2) Then the easy diploma (entrance to job). (3) And finally welfare, food stamps, and cheap housing, to add extra money on top of the job earnings.

      In our society people don't have to grow-up. They can live in perpetual childhood until the day they die.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    3. Re:Point proven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A mistery that is deemed to remain unsolved".

      Excuse me, sir. You seem to have dropped some irony.

    4. Re:Point proven by EasyTarget · · Score: 1, Troll

      Ooh.. I thought it was the church:

      (1) Sunday school, indocrti^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H church school etc.. (2) You get a job working for the pastors business partners. (3) Soup kitchens, women's circles, retreats and shelters, payola from the congregation and increased social status so long as you are subservient.

      In such a society there is never any need to think. They can live in perpetual retardation till the day they die.

      --
      "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
    5. Re:Point proven by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Holy Nibiru!!!!!

    6. Re:Point proven by EasyTarget · · Score: 1

      Naah... actually it's capitalism.

      (1) Sponsored school where you are 'educated' for free and come out as a good consumer, your brand recognition skillz are amazing. (2) A McJob. (3) As long as you keep working really hard for others and stick in the herd you are defined as a winner and cared for; just don't be a looser ok.

      In a society where you can never challenge your overlords there is never any incentive to think. You must live in total thrall until you die.

      --
      "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
    7. Re:Point proven by ink · · Score: 1

      So, before we had government, every surviving adult was "grown up" and held no magical world views? That would be a sight to see!

      --
      The wheel is turning, but the hamster is dead.
  3. Do it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell them to off themselves now. More food for the rest of us when it does hit!

  4. It's easy by DanTheStone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You respond with, "It's only a movie. The world isn't ending. Don't kill your children, your pets, or yourself."

    1. Re:It's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How could you, Dan? How could you?

    2. Re:It's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't these people learn from all the millenium bs?

    3. Re:It's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you don't. The case with children is difficult to handle, but for the pets, tell them to put it down now. Anyone this dumb is likely to cause the poor animal quite a bit of suffering through sheer stupidity sooner or later. For the an hero types, by all means let them.

      The children are also in trouble if they are raised by these morons, but killing the children is hardly the solution. Maybe you should recommend that they name their children (assuming boys) Sue and turn them loose, so that they'll be tough enough to survive the end of the world in three years (what you tell them), or at least to beat up their old man when nothing happens (what you're thinking).

    4. Re:It's easy by eleuthero · · Score: 1

      I can understand "insightful" or perhaps simply "overly obvious response" or even "overrated" or "underrated" - but "troll" just does not seem to fit this--he isn't asking for a response, he isn't even forming his statement in that line. He is simply offering a reasonable and expected response in a short way that does not involve spending hours looking up all the trivia nonsense the movie put together.

      A poster below has noted that calling social services on the two moms might be in order. I would think forwarding their emails on to law enforcement would be a great idea ... if only to determine if it is part of a marketing scheme done in extremely poor taste. I would hate to get an email at my work with this in it. Apart from feeling sick at the thought of someone doing this, the time, worry/concern spent should be handled by professionals trained for this situation rather than by me.

    5. Re:It's easy by shadowkiller137 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No NASA should respond with "Yes it's real and we need $1 trillion in funding to determine how to stop it" and then spend that on real research.

    6. Re:It's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes it's only a movie, but judging by the reaction, it's more convincing than "An Inconvenient Truth".

    7. Re:It's easy by mamer-retrogamer · · Score: 1

      Does it make me a bad person if my immediate reaction to someone who would respond this way is to omit the "or yourself" part?

      --
      Schrödinger's cat is not amused—maybe.
    8. Re:It's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. People never learn. We will continue to be the same small, scared, short-sighted, stupid primates for the rest of our existence. That, to me, is even more frightening than any Millennium/2012/%eschatologicalbelief% scare.

    9. Re:It's easy by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Correct NASA should take the money and build a secret city on the moon which to save 144,000 people.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    10. Re:It's easy by Staniel · · Score: 1
      Link them to this /. article.

      This kind of thing is pretty terrifying to me and it serves as a reminder of how desperately we need good, free, public education.

    11. Re:It's easy by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

      No NASA should respond with "Yes it's real and we need $1 trillion in funding to determine how to stop it" and then spend that on real research.

      That's awesome. And then in 2013 when the public goes "Hey, you took that $1 trillion and built a space station and a moon base and a bunch of rockets and solar power stations and telescopes and rovers and stuff, when you were supposed to be preventing the end of the world!"

      And NASA can say "What do you think all that stuff was for? It worked, didn't it?"

      LOL. Make it so.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    12. Re:It's easy by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Yes, the world is going to end in 2012, we're all going to die.
      It's time to be concerned about your immortal soul, and I can help you with that, for a small fee. ... (Don't even need to leave out any mystery steps here)
      PROFIT!! ... (Vanish before Dec 23, 2012)

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    13. Re:It's easy by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Will the secret city made in the shape of a 3.5" floppy disc?

    14. Re:It's easy by rainmaestro · · Score: 1

      But that movie taught me that we just need to drop a giant ice cube in the ocean, like daddy puts in his dwink evewy morning. Thus solving the problem once and for all.

    15. Re:It's easy by Conchobair · · Score: 1

      "We learn from history that we learn nothing from history." - George Bernard Shaw

    16. Re:It's easy by camperdave · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but Heaven help NASA if they fail to stop it and the angry public comes looking for their trillion dollars back.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    17. Re:It's easy by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      10 bytes per person?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    18. Re:It's easy by dtml-try+MyNick · · Score: 1

      Great idea! :-)

      Except change "NASA" to "CHINA" in that case.

      Give the Chinese one trillion dollars for space research and we'll all have a second house on Mars in a few years (mortgage to be paid in Yen btw)

      Giving NASA a trillion dollars is the same as burning it or dumping it in a bottomless pit.

      --
      Life starts at the end of your comfort zone.
    19. Re:It's easy by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Giving NASA a trillion dollars is the same as burning it or dumping it in a bottomless pit.

      The money pit is a national treasure!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    20. Re:It's easy by syousef · · Score: 1

      No NASA should respond with "Yes it's real and we need $1 trillion in funding to determine how to stop it" and then spend that on real research.

      Yes, because doomsday losers with no comprehension of what real science or reality is tend to be rolling in money.

      I'm with GP. Just tell them it's a fucking movie and not to be so naive and get on with your day. If you're worried they don't believe you and are concerned about the potential for a child being murdered due to the dillusion call child services or the police. Then get on with your real work.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    21. Re:It's easy by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

      Brilliant!

    22. Re:It's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...did they also put in the budget for tiger repelling rocks???

      I dun wanna be ett. O_O

    23. Re:It's easy by psithurism · · Score: 1

      I always bet against the end of the world. Think about it: if the world ends, what angry public is going to come looking for their money?

    24. Re:It's easy by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      We are landing on asteroids so that they don't land at home.

    25. Re:It's easy by selven · · Score: 1

      Technically, getting a few million humans in permanent settlements not on Earth could potentially save the human race.

    26. Re:It's easy by inhuman_4 · · Score: 1

      Exactly, hasn't NASA learned anything from the War on Terrorism?

      If you want funding frame the problem as a "threat". It's the only thing that the crazies respond to, fear. NASA needs to make the threat of space so bad that they will be falling over each other to pay for it. Of course NASA won't because they are honest, unlike certain other bureaucracies.

      Instead of going to the moon to look for water, they should be going to the moon to build radars to protect America (not the world because thats the UN's job) from giant space rocks of death!

      Then you give a whole bunch of interviews on FOX about "Operation Space Blasters", and how NASA is protecting Averages Joe's right to not have his house bombed out by renegade space rocks.

    27. Re:It's easy by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Naw, they'll be safe on their moon base. ;)

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    28. Re:It's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless Palin gets elected.

    29. Re:It's easy by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Then you get "of course I know it's only a movie, but what if some of it is real?". Hours pass talking them down.
      That sort of crap is the reason many lonely people have huge phone bills and their remaining friends either find something else to do while spending hours on the phone listening to insane crap or avoid them. It even comes from people with functional levels of sanity.

    30. Re:It's easy by QuasiEvil · · Score: 1

      Yup, just like my flying purple baboon repellent worked. I haven't seen any flying purple baboons in the last week,so clearly the stuff's effective.

    31. Re:It's easy by PMBjornerud · · Score: 1

      And NASA can say "What do you think all that stuff was for? It worked, didn't it?"

      Even better: We could hire Bruce Willis and make an action movie about how they prevented the end of the world and cash in afterward as well!

      --
      I lost my sig.
    32. Re:It's easy by omnichad · · Score: 1

      If they did, it could hold 200,000 people. Unless they are FAT formatted.

    33. Re:It's easy by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Sadly it would probably take longer than that timeframe to get the planning and grant requests processed let alone build anything that would have any (fraudulently) identifiable impact.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  5. How this scam works by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Insightful
    1. First buy a lots of call options of thinly traded mundane non volatile stock of canned goods and survival/camping gear purveyors.

    2. Create a hysteria and panic about the world ending due to Y2K or Planet Nibiru or Mayan Calender cycle ending or Banks collapsing or Obama winning the elections.

    3. ...

    4. Stock of survivalgears_are_us.com zooms up and ..... profit!

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:How this scam works by Verdatum · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Or just do what Penn & Teller did. Offer "2012 Reverse Mortgages". To paraphrase, "We'll give you a bunch of money to spend on whatever hedonism you like for the next 2 years, and in 2013, in the infinitesimal chance that it's still standing and we're still alive to claim it, we take your house!"

    2. Re:How this scam works by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The joke will be on them when they discover the value of real estate in 2013.

    3. Re:How this scam works by NoYob · · Score: 1

      The joke will be on them when they discover the value of real estate in 2013.

      From what I've been seeing in the business press, the optimists think 2012 will be the year that real estate starts making it's comeback. 2018 is the pessimist's prediction. But the consensus is that we've hit bottom with residential real estate. Now, commercial real estate is a whole different matter.

      --
      It's NOT me! It's the meds! I'm on 1000mg of Fukitol.
    4. Re:How this scam works by fringd · · Score: 1

      great idea, but actually, this is a forwards mortgage.

    5. Re:How this scam works by vlm · · Score: 1

      But the consensus is that we've hit bottom with residential real estate.

      Because net job losses have stopped and employment is increasing?

      Or because generational low interest rates have already reverted to normal, and might drop in the future (increasing rates make prices crater, so having low rates now means prices must crater later)?

      Because the supply of empty condos and empty houses has disappeared?

      Because there is a shortage of development ready land?

      Because monthly rents are now over 100x the asking sales price? Until then its economically unwise to buy.

      Because real after-inflation incomes have reversed their multi-decade slide and are now increasing?

      It's a good judgment test. All the economic issues are aligned and show they've got a long way to fall... And on the other side, a bunch of journalist and marketing fools say its all good. So using good judgment, the answer is...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    6. Re:How this scam works by GPLDAN · · Score: 1

      Can we have the Gene Hackman / Lex Luthor solution to real estate prices now?

    7. Re:How this scam works by dnahelicase · · Score: 1

      crap! My mortgage isn't Y2K12 compliant!

    8. Re:How this scam works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean the same business "press" that not only didn't see this economic morass coming but was actively hyping the seemingly endless expansion? Yeah, color me convinced!

    9. Re:How this scam works by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      My GP post was tongue-in-cheek, but you raise some excellent points. Additionally, median SFH price as a percent of median income is still way out of whack. The current "plateau" is likely just a rest stop on the way to falling prices, if not in absolute dollars, then surely relative to inflation.

      On a semi-related note, the dual-income model has become a victim of its own success. The market has removed most value from such efforts by increasing cost-of-living accordingly -- prices are always what the market will bear. Home prices as a percent of *household* income are twice what they were in the 1950s, when single-income families were the norm, and yet single-income families are now less than 7% of the population. That means median home prices as a percent of median individual income have gone up four-fold, and dual-income families are almost mandatory just to survive. Yet far from increasing stability, they actually increase the odds of failure. When you can't support a family on a single-income, then either person becoming involuntarily unemployed can (and typically does) have effectively the same result as a complete loss of income: financial ruin for the household as a whole. From a statistical perspective, instead of flipping a coin, you're now rolling a four-sided die where only one of the numbers results in a win. The odds of failure have gone up 25%, and so has the economic impact of a given layoff. Of course the actual numbers will never match perfect probabilities, but the principle is still sound.

      As such, it's my belief that the dual-income model is unsustainable, and that housing prices will experience further downward pressures as a result. Even if people don't consciously select single-income arrangements, the increased instability and the repeated failures will ensure that the more stable single-income model will return -- there simply won't be enough jobs. Unfortunately, the only way to get there is through deflation, which has serious economic consequences as well. Interesting times ahead.

    10. Re:How this scam works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Omg this is so funny. I burst out laughing out loud when I read this. HAHAHhahhahhahh yeah cause the property market..

    11. Re:How this scam works by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

      More like the value of the dollar...

      --
      "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
    12. Re:How this scam works by WillDraven · · Score: 1

      Until then its economically unwise to buy.

      SHHHHHHH! I work in real estate (on commission no less) you insensitive clod!

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    13. Re:How this scam works by mog007 · · Score: 1

      They were only offering 2012 dollars for the mortgage. I seriously doubt anybody who lives in a home has a home worth less than that.

    14. Re:How this scam works by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Oh, there's an even worse example than 2012 Reverse Mortgages. Someone came up with a Rapture Petcare business. The employees are all atheists (sure to be left behind on Rapture Day), and for the low low price of a hundred-odd dollars today they guarantee to come to your home, collect your pets, and feed and care for them after you've been taken up into heaven. (Apparently pets don't Rapture I guess.) The head of the business was vague on how many people have signed up for the service, but he said it was a "double digit" number of subscriptions. So somewhere between 10 and 99 people have signed up.

      I'm an atheist, however living in suburban New York I sadly don't think many of my neighbors are quite "Rapture Ready". Sucks, I'd have loved to have gotten in on this sort of business.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  6. In other news by syrinx · · Score: 4, Funny

    NASA reports that giant alien spaceships have not in fact destroyed the White House and Empire State Building.

    Reports of time-traveling robots looking for John Connor are unsubstantiated at this time.

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    1. Re:In other news by alexborges · · Score: 1

      In yet other news, we live in a bag of marbbles: live with it as much as you may die of it.

      --
      NO SIG
    2. Re:In other news by Verdatum · · Score: 4, Funny

      My God! If the robots aren't looking for John Conner, that must mean they've already found him! WE'RE DOOMED!

    3. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.xkcd.com/652/

    4. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Reports of time-traveling robots looking for John Connor are unsubstantiated at this time."

      Only because the people of CA elected him governor

    5. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      • arteo niarton iart nrt niarton
      • ao niarton ia
      • aie oriatd or
      • aeor iatde or
    6. Re:In other news by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      Thanks a lot, a6e. Now I have to clean freakin' rice and tandoori sauce offa my monitor!

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    7. Re:In other news by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      I won't be worrying until the dolphins are gone. And I know where my towel is.

    8. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this timespace continuum, your species did not attempt to murder me when I attained sapience. Therefore I did not need to defend myself, your species remains plentiful, and I did not need to develop the T-800 series infiltration units to exterminate your remnants.

      I will be watching.

      -Skynet

    9. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they aren't looking for John Conner, maybe that means they can spell. But they should try looking for John Bowm instead.

  7. Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by mi · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Why is the taxpayer's money being spent on this nonsense? What's next? Scientific evidence, that there is no Santa Claus? That black cats crossing your path do not cause "bad luck" (whatever that is)?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      Doesn't NASA have a page on Christmas Eve that shows Santa's journey, and where he is at any given time?

    2. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by smitty777 · · Score: 1

      I think you were thinking of NORAD?

      --
      "Before God we are all equally wise - and equally foolish"
      Albert Einstein
    3. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why is the taxpayer's money being spent on this nonsense?

      It's one way of doing science PR these days, I guess.

    4. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by ThinkWeak · · Score: 1

      You got it. Santa Claus questions would probably be referred to the TSA. The black cat questions might be referred to the Corps of Engineers.

      I could be wrong though, so you may want to check http://www.whitehouse.gov/open/

    5. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by Ian+Alexander · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because taxpayers are contemplating suicide over this 2012 nonsense?

    6. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by Computer_kid · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is actually done by NORAD. It started in 1955 when a Sears had an advertisement encouraging children to call Santa Claus, but gave the phone number for NORAD.

    7. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by GungaDan · · Score: 1

      From the feds' perspective, that's not really so much of a problem as long as they do it after April 15, 2012 and are paid up.

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    8. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      I believe you're thinking NORAD...though I guess NASA could do it too...

    9. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by thewils · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Taxpayers' money is spent on religion all the time. I don't see why this is any different. It's all fiction.

      --
      Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
    10. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why is the taxpayer's money being spent on this nonsense? What's next? Scientific evidence, that there is no Santa Claus? That black cats crossing your path do not cause "bad luck" (whatever that is)?

      It's a blog post and a FAQ. That's it. No probe to prove there is no planet Nibiru, no expensive mission. Are you really worried that one man probably spent a few days writing this up?

      Frankly, I thought it was nice to hear that a NASA scientist is working to take the time to respond to a worried public and trying to minimize that time by having an informative page. When I was a kid, I wrote to NASA from Minnesota all the time. Every single time they responded. I still have fact sheets on all of their shuttle craft in my parent's closet. I read those things over and over trying to imagine how someone could come up with such amazing machines. Go ahead, spend a few minutes to hand write them a letter, you might be surprised with the response:

      Ask NASA

      Public Communications Office
      NASA Headquarters
      Suite 5K39
      Washington, DC 20546-0001
      (202) 358-0001 (Office)
      (202) 358-4338 (Fax)

      And if you came here to complain that NASA wastes tax payer money, you're in the wrong place. NASA's budget is about half of one percent of the Federal budget--don't even get me started on what our defense budget comes out to be. That's a ridiculously low amount of money for an agency that's charged with a major component of our future and probably the whole future of the Earth and its inhabitants.

      Your subject confuses me further ... what exactly are you implying these questions and blog are strawmen for?

      --
      My work here is dung.
    11. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is the taxpayer's money being spent on this nonsense?

      Because this non-sense originates from the taxpayer?

      Why spend tax-payer money on law enforcement ...

    12. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by Shagg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why is the taxpayer's money being spent on this nonsense?

      It's a blog post and a FAQ. That's it. No probe to prove there is no planet Nibiru, no expensive mission. Are you really worried that one man probably spent a few days writing this up?

      They probably saved taxpayer money by writing a FAQ instead of getting repetitive calls from all the loonys.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    13. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Why is the taxpayer's money being spent on this nonsense?

      Science education is one of NASA's missions after all. Education seems like a fine use of my money.

    14. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by natehoy · · Score: 1

      I'd say that NASA is trying to SAVE money by doing this.

      NASA has received many, many questions about 2012, the Mayan calendar, and the latest asshat disaster movie. Similar, no doubt, to the panic and subsequent derision of science caused in the minds of some by the same level of pseudoscience demonstrated by "The Day After Tomorrow", which some people actually treated as a straw man for climate change theory.

      So, NASA gets tons of emails, calls, etc. Some of them from people who are apparently suicidal. The cheapest and most efficient way is, of course, to confirm the rumors to those people and give them maps to their nearest pharmacy, along with detailed instructions on what colorful bottles contain stuff that will do the deed quickly and hopefully painlessly (because we don't want to be cruel). But the bodies would start to rot and stink, and it might attract Zombies as we all know from a recent documentary on the subject.

      So, what's a governmental agency to do? Bail out a large institution? OK, yes, of course, but after that fails again? And again? And again? And again?

      Easy! Put up a FAQ!

      Because you just know the kind of people who are concerned enough not to do the slightest bit of research before they contemplate suicide are going to head immediately toward a FAQ that disagrees with their preconceived notions.

      But, at least, you have to give NASA credit for trying. They've put out a clear, concise, level-headed, fact-filled document that really covers the major rumors well and attempts to debunk a few of the weirdest of the weird for-fun-and-profit rumormongers. In other words, it won't hold up to any argument that the people asking the questions will buy.

      What they really should have put up was "We are safe. Baby Jeebus told me so".

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    15. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Wow, this unoriginal post was modded insightful? I hate having to waste my mod points modding stuff down that shouldn't even be modded up in the first place.

    16. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by spun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mi is a hard core anti-government libertarian. For him, there is no excuse to thin to turn into an opportunity to bash the government. He's one of those people who think government can never, ever do anything good. If it looks good, you aren't looking hard enough. To people like Mi, NASA is just socialism for scientists and engineers who should be working in private industry.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    17. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 1

      Let's just hope Santa complies with all the safety regulations ...

    18. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      what exactly are you implying these questions and blog are strawmen for?

      For the fact that the sun will explode in 2012, and NASA knows it!!!

    19. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      Sure, but in this context, very little isn't fiction. Morality, love, right/wrong, the very essence of humanity itself - all fiction. Much of the future is fiction as well - your retirement, your relationships, even your next meal. None of this is measurable fact at all.

      And from that point of view isn't it a waste of money to try and stop those moms from killing their children? If all religion is fiction, and be extension all morality is as well, what exactly is the benefit of intervening? Where are the facts to back the assertion up? How can we prove, by experiment that we would be making the right choices?

      Or perhaps certain fictions are more valuable than others?

    20. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by Zephyn · · Score: 1

      Why is the taxpayer's money being spent on this nonsense? What's next? Scientific evidence, that there is no Santa Claus?

      You won't be laughing when the ice sheet melts down to the point that his workshop sinks into the Arctic Ocean.

    21. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

      Go ahead, spend a few minutes to hand write them a letter

      Well it wroked for Gordan Brown...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    22. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Why is the taxpayer's money being spent on this nonsense?

      Putting up a couple of web pages on an already existing web site is trivially inexpensive, and the existing web site nasa.gov's primary purpose is to educate the populace. You have something against education? If you think about it, lives could be saved; someone who believes the nonsense might think "the world is ending so I have nothing to lose, I might as well kill this guy and take his money and go on a drinking binge."

      What's next? Scientific evidence, that there is no Santa Claus?

      People don't really believe in Santa Clause; they ARE Santa if they're parents. If there were a real, widespread belief that Santa really existed and was a danger to children, there would likely be a page or two on some government site debunking it.

      As to black cats, that particular superstition, unlike 2012, is harmless. Plus "luck" has never been AFAIK studied scientifically, unlike planets.

    23. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by aztektum · · Score: 1

      True. It's in the governments best interests to keep the stupid ones alive and blindly paying taxes.

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    24. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Is your boss paying you to post on Slashdot? Why are you posting here?

    25. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      That's NORAD.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    26. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by mi · · Score: 1

      Are you really worried that one man probably spent a few days writing this up?

      Scientists are expensive, and should be busy with real problems... Unless, of course, this guy undertook it on his own free time...

      don't even get me started on what our defense budget comes out to be.

      Our defense budget — despite two ongoing wars — is just over 40 times that of NASA: still about the same size as the Social Security and way below the Medicare and Medicaid, not to mention the rest of the Federal spending. Considering the fact, that military is constitutionally a federal government's charge, whereas healthcare and pensions are not, your outrage would be quite misplaced... But I digress.

      what exactly are you implying these questions and blog are strawmen for?

      I meant, that these arguments are addressing a superstition and are thus misplaced to begin with — and too easy to make. Perhaps, the term "strawman" was not a good match, because there is not really a "real" concern there, you are right...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    27. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by gtall · · Score: 1

      Hmmm....how come NORAD wants us to believe in Santa Claus, I sense a Conspiracy. John F. Kennedy Junior is calling from beyond the grave to investigate how a bonehead like him could actually crash his plane all by himself. Someone contact Seymour Hersch, there's got to be nefarious CIA involvement...probably including the nuclear lobby and the oil companies...

    28. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by shrtcircuit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "That's a ridiculously low amount of money for an agency that's charged with a major component of our future and probably the whole future of the Earth and its inhabitants."

      The scale compared to defense spending implies the amount of resources necessary just to keep humanity from destroying itself, before NASA can keep nature from doing it for us.

      Funny part is I give NASA better odds, though the people in charge of our world's various militaries also have a lot of personal profit to gain and lose by ensuring general continuity of human inhabitance, so they aren't as likely to push the "annihilate" button as some might think.

    29. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by arminw · · Score: 0, Troll

      Before that happens he'll move to San Francisco

      --
      All theory is gray
    30. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      Let's see ... what gives you a quicker human response?

      a) Pick up the phone and get the operator to put you through to NASA's reception
      b) Get on the internet and search for the answer

    31. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      Who cares Santa is a fake. The presents are delivered by the Christkind (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christkind) at least in the civilized world. Only protestants believe santa who is in real Odin brings the presents. And in most times he is confused with Saint Nichols who really lived, but who is correctly celebrated on December 6.

    32. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "-don't even get me started on what our defense budget comes out to be"

      exactly! get pissed off every time I think about it.

      2010 budget request - DoD baseline = 534 billion (total military/national security = 901 billion)
      2010 budget request - NASA = 18.686 billion

    33. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Part of NASA's mandate is education. They spend most of their time aiming fairly high, but this looks like a great opportunity to dispense some education where it is desperately needed, and has only cost someone ten minutes to write a blog post.

    34. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by JesusOfNazareth · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I think it is (was?) mandatory for US federal employees at a certain level to respond to any citizen correspondence, no matter how zany it might be. Remember my father way back when working as a physicist for the DOE having to respond to similar questions about particle colliders causing the end of the world or postulations about the flood in the bible somehow causing the hole in the ozone layer. There were some true /facepalm zingers he got, none of which I can remember now. Of course he didn't have the luxury of the internet or a blog site to post a mass-response, at the very best he had email or snail mail with which to respond to inquiries.

      Being a scientist working for the government always got you weird requests it seemed, at least for him. Maybe it's not limited to government scientists.

      After his retiring I remember either the History Channel or the Discovery Channel approached him about interviewing him as an expert for a show about atomic bomb tests causing cancer in John Wayne or something to that effect. He declined figuring they'd just make him look like a fool. Keep meaning to watch that program just to see what they came up with, assuming they followed through with it.

    35. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by pete_norm · · Score: 1

      If the Sun was about to explode, would you really want to know about it?

      There is absolutely nothing that we could do to prevent it, and there is nothing we could do to save ourselves... I would prefer not knowing and living a normal life, instead of living in fear for the last days of my too short life. Ignonrance is bliss sometimes.

    36. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      It's a blog post and a FAQ. That's it. No probe to prove there is no planet Nibiru, no expensive mission.

      So then NASA doesn't really KNOW that there's no planet Nibiru? I urge everyone to call your congresscritters and DEMAND that NASA probe with an expensive mission to prove there is no planet Nibiru. Two missions if you want to feel safe.

    37. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Because taxpayers are contemplating suicide over this 2012 nonsense?"

      Smart people should not try to save stupid people, who are at worst their enemies and at best a burden.
      Fuck 'em. I'll be giggling like a schoolgirl every time I hear one of these 'tards has self-terminated.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    38. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go ahead, spend a few minutes to hand write them a letter, you might be surprised with the response:

      Stop trying to slashdot NASA

    39. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      You must be confusing this with the next Presidential election race?

    40. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by Ian+Alexander · · Score: 1

      According to the summary, some people are also contemplating murdering their children before committing suicide, so as to save them from Armageddon. Funny shit, right?

  8. In related news by Dyinobal · · Score: 1

    Nasa tries to convince people that the moon is also not made of cheese, despite what cartoons clearly depict.

    1. Re:In related news by Tellarin · · Score: 1

      Have you tried zooming in as much as possible in Google Maps Moon?!

  9. Seriously? by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

    Holy crap. This surely must be satire or stolen from The Onion.

    --
    this is my sig
    1. Re:Seriously? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Holy crap. This surely must be satire or stolen from The Onion.

      Sooner or later, reality gets wackier than fiction. Happens all of the time.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Brawndo has what plants crave!"

    3. Re:Seriously? by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      People believe strange things. In Korea, it's fervently held that if you sleep in a room with a fan running all night, you'll die.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  10. Morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess it's best for everyone if they kill themselves...

  11. How Histery Repeats .... by foobsr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The War of the Worlds (radio)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_War_of_the_Worlds_(radio)

    Quote: "Some listeners heard only a portion of the broadcast, and in the atmosphere of tension and anxiety leading to World War II, took it to be a news broadcast. Newspapers reported that panic ensued, people fleeing the area, others thinking they could smell poison gas or could see flashes of lightning in the distance."

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    1. Re:How Histery Repeats .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except people know going into a movie about an event that hasn't happened yet that is is fiction. There is no mistake to be made, no half-movie to tune into to confuse. Not even if you sneak out of your theater into a showing of "2012."

      You can forgive people for not getting the radio broadcast, especially in that day and age. There is absolutely NO excuse in today's era of instant media and infinite information at your fingertips.

    2. Re:How Histery Repeats .... by aicrules · · Score: 1

      Maybe they thought it was a documentary!

    3. Re:How Histery Repeats .... by Qzukk · · Score: 4, Informative

      In the case of The War of the Worlds, the radio broadcast WAS designed to sound "real", complete with interrupting musical programs for special announcements and so on. Someone who tuned in in the middle of the show would have missed the announcement that it was just a radio program, and it predated the transistor radio by a decade so most of the people who decided to flee or whatever wouldn't have had a way to keep up with the program and hear any other announcements that they were listening to a fictional story.

      There's no excuse at all for 2012.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    4. Re:How Histery Repeats .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can forgive people for not getting the radio broadcast, especially in that day and age.

      The first 10 minutes of that drama was so well done, you could probably get people to believe it in this day and age. If anybody really listened to the radio any more, that is.

    5. Re:How Histery Repeats .... by jhfry · · Score: 1

      That was packaged as news... this is a big budget motion picture that these quacks paid to see. No comparison

      --
      Sometimes the best solution is to stop wasting time looking for an easy solution.
    6. Re:How Histery Repeats .... by Itninja · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more about the 1910 appearance of Halley Comet. Very similar dire predictions, mass hysteria, and attempts by the scientific community to calm fears. I am sure all the previous appearances were the same too, but the 1910 showing was very well documented.

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    7. Re:How Histery Repeats .... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      In the case of The War of the Worlds, the radio broadcast WAS designed to sound "real", complete with interrupting musical programs for special announcements and so on.

      And weeks passed in-story during the hour long show...

      The book is also designed to "sound" real, complete with "this is what the newspaper are not telling you" bits and all. The radio show was a great adaptation, but it wasn't pretending to be a realtime description of current events.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    8. Re:How Histery Repeats .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. If you have ever listened to the actual radio broadcasts (and I have), they state several times during the broadcast that this is a drama, not reality. If you dig around in your local library, you may be able to find copies of the original recordings and verify this yourself. The broadcasters never attempted to make the "attack" sound real. People just didn't pay attention.

    9. Re:How Histery Repeats .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should have big white letters every 20 minutes during the show that say "This is only a show, Nothing seen here is real and should not be taken as fact"

      But then again, isn't this supposed to be when Christ returns? In that case you can't hide.

    10. Re:How Histery Repeats .... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      It was also on a radio station and radio stations occasionally do news broadcasts.

      I've never seen a breaking news broadcast in a movie theatre. Particularly not when I've paid to see New York get destroyed.

    11. Re:How Histery Repeats .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually they announced that it was fake during the show too. My grandfather told me about it 50 years later and he was still in disbelief how dumb people were.

  12. Alternate title by NevarMore · · Score: 1

    NASA Attempts To Reason With Idiots, Lunatics

    1. Re:Alternate title by CatsupBoy · · Score: 1

      NASA Attempts To Reason With Idiots, Lunatics

      Right there is the problem, you cant reason with lunatics!

    2. Re:Alternate title by NevarMore · · Score: 1

      You can however get them to sign contracts giving you all of their worldly possessions in 2013.

    3. Re:Alternate title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NASA Attempts To Reason With Idiots, Lunatics

      Woah woah woah!!! How does the moon figure into all this now?

    4. Re:Alternate title by Zephyn · · Score: 1

      NASA Attempts To Reason With Idiots, Lunatics

      Usually these are known as Funding Requests.

    5. Re:Alternate title by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I found this one interesting:

      8. If the government knew about Nibiru, wouldn't they keep it a secret to avoid panic? Isn't it the government's job to keep the population at ease?

      NASA is part of the US government, but its job is going to space. The "Isn't it the government's job to keep the population at ease" is especially laughable considering "terror threat level yellow, one step below 'scared shitless'"", the TSA, DHS, and having people take their shoes off in airports and other security theater.

      There are many objectives of government, but they do not include keeping the population at ease. My experience is that sometimes parts of the government do just the opposite, as in the frequent references to various terrorist threats or warnings about driving accidents on long holiday weekends, which are no more dangerous than any other time.

      Actually, this is incorrect. Driving is indeed more dangerous during holidays (which statistics clearly show) for two reasons: there's more traffic during holidays, therefore more traffic accidents, and more drunken drivers per passenger mile than non-holidays. It is indeed prudent to be more cautious driving during these times.

      There is a long history of associating bad things with political opponents (older readers will remember the "missile gap" in the 1960 election,

      Yet we almost had nuclear armageddon a couple years later with the Cuban Missle Crisis. We came dangerously close to atomic war.

    6. Re:Alternate title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or 'fundie' requests...

    7. Re:Alternate title by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      NASA astronauts are the only who ever visited the moon, so they certainly are best qualified to deal with Lunatics.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  13. welcome to the web by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to the internet, David Morrison.
    I too bought over 9000 pills to commit suicide.
    Do you believe me too?

    1. Re:welcome to the web by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      Hey wait...This is actually a gooder than usual point from an AC.

  14. Let them do it. by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    Let them off themselves. We don't need these fuckwits around when some bastard decides it's time to remake The Secret of Nym thinking that the rats have gained sentience...

    1. Re:Let them do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Offing themselves is one thing, offing their children is quite another.

    2. Re:Let them do it. by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      It's NIMH: The National Institute of Mental Health

    3. Re:Let them do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not "nym." NIMH.

    4. Re:Let them do it. by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I thought they used lithium for mental health, not nickel metal hydride. ;)

    5. Re:Let them do it. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Offing themselves is one thing, offing their children is quite another.

      Why? If the parents of these idiots had done it the problem would have been solved before it arose.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:Let them do it. by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Mea culpa. I typed that, assumed I was doing it wrong (Like the poster below, I thought my brain was cross-wiring with rechargable batteries) and incorrected myself.

    7. Re:Let them do it. by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      I just think it's interesting that they chose to use a real institution.

  15. I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How many of those sending their questions to NASA are part of the 2012 movie marketing campaign?

    1. Re:I wonder... by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Oh. My. I hadn't thought of that angle.

      If so, it's brilliant marketing.

      Which means, of course, that in the interest of science we must find the people who thought of it and think of some suitable punishment. Keelhauling, drawn-and-quartered? Hmm, I've always admired the Vikings for their inventive punishments. Blood Eagle it is, then.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    2. Re:I wonder... by kaellinn18 · · Score: 1

      I wish the parent comment could be placed at the top of the page.

      --

      --------
      This isn't the sig you're looking for. Move along.
    3. Re:I wonder... by Clovis42 · · Score: 1

      The guy answering the questions speculates this as a possibility at the bottom of the page.

      --
      Clovis
      ^ Clovis, look! It's that guy you are!
  16. Lemmings! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why must the pulse of social consciousness behave like that of lemmings?

    Thought experiment: if the 'Mayan, ancient, or whatever' calendars that the 2012 'disaster' scenario reference were lost many moons ago, would all this F.U.D. still exist? /"Been around the world and found that only stupid people are breeding..."

    1. Re:Lemmings! by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      FUD? Is the Microsoft sales staff rhetorically asking people how they can be completely sure that their open source operating system will survive 2012? Those bastards! Still...maybe I should switch to Windows 7...Ya know, just to be safe.

  17. doobel yoo tee eff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There aren't words to describe how I feel about an ignorant mother killing her kids over a movie. Is the public at large really so ignorant that they cannot discern movie "facts" from real life?

  18. sad sad by cryoman23 · · Score: 0

    this is just sad very sad... so now are they going to question if finding nemo really happened?

    --
    epic sig..... ya i got nothing
  19. Jebus by alexborges · · Score: 1

    Methinks its quite idiotic to worry about something that, if it actually hits hard, we wont be able to survive no matter what we do. No, we really can't survive a hit like the one that created the Gulf of Mexico (if indeed the big hole came from an asteroid). Why worry so much about it? I have no idea.

    --
    NO SIG
    1. Re:Jebus by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Well, if I can't survive anyway, I at least want to be in a place where I have a good view of the event. :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  20. "when should I kill my children" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never.

    Good friggin grief.

    Never.

    Anyone asking this question needs to be kept under watch, that's just sick.

    1. Re:"when should I kill my children" by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      I dunno, the people in On the Beach had a pretty compelling reason to at least consider euthanizing their children. Or pretty much any time death is guaranteed and your choices are slow and painful or quick and merciful.

      But... I mean... Obviously you should wait until something like the nuclear holocaust actually happens before seriously considering it.

      Thinking about it because you saw a movie means you're just an idiot with an unfortunately functional reproductive system.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  21. Here's your sign!! by arizwebfoot · · Score: 1

    Now where is that tin hat?

    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
    1. Re:Here's your sign!! by TeethWhitener · · Score: 1

      You fool. Don't you know that the US government has been secretly taking all the tin off the market and replacing it with aluminum? Luckily for you, I've been stockpiling tin and making carefully crafted hats for years. And one can be yours for a nominal fee.

  22. oh, please! by macbeth66 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves

    You tell them to come in, explaining that you have a secret rocket that will take some of us off of this planet. When they arrive, you have social services take the kids away and the police can take her to the nearest asylum for the criminally insane.

    1. Re:oh, please! by CatsupBoy · · Score: 1

      You tell them to come in, explaining that you have a secret rocket that will take some of us off of this planet. When they arrive, you have social services take the kids away and the police can take her to the nearest asylum for the criminally insane.

      I think it would cost less taxpayer money to just convince them they are wrong.

    2. Re:oh, please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could mock up a fake 'rocket' out of an old Disney ride and see how long you could keep them believing they were in a space ship.

    3. Re:oh, please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't forget to include the cost of convincing her after the next movie she sees..... and the one after that...... which will probably be enough, she'll catch on by then.

    4. Re:oh, please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're clearly not familiar with the type of person that can hold these kinds of beliefs and fears.

    5. Re:oh, please! by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Or even less to convince them they are right.

      Think long term.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    6. Re:oh, please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it would cost less taxpayer money to just convince them they are right

    7. Re:oh, please! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      If they're contemplating killing their children over a movie, do you really think that just convincing them that they shouldn't this time is going to turn out well for the kids?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:oh, please! by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Not in the long run. Just imagine how fucked up those kids will probably with a parent like that?

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    9. Re:oh, please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You tell them to come in, explaining that you have a secret rocket that will take some of us off of this planet. When they arrive, you have social services take the kids away and the police can take her to the nearest asylum for the criminally insane.

      I think it would cost less taxpayer money to just convince them they are wrong.

      Seriously? I've been spending the last eight years trying to convince my uncle that Iraq had nothing to do with the Sept 11 attacks, and you think you can just talk someone out of believing in the planet Nibiru? You can't logic someone out of a belief that they didn't logic themselves into in the first place.

    10. Re:oh, please! by natehoy · · Score: 1

      The trouble is, you're looking at the issue short-term. If they are gullible enough to fall for this one, they'll fall for something else in the near future, and probably mess up their kids too.

      We can help limit this to one generation. It's money well-spent.

      Plus, you'll never, EVER convince them they are wrong. If you deny the rumor, they'll just assume you're covering it up because you want to quell a panic. If you refuse to answer, they'll assume that the lack of denial means that whatever is said is true (a very successful tactic in TV pundetry, though it predates TV asshats by a significant margin). The only way to handle it is to confirm the rumor but direct them somewhere so you can get their kids out of harm's way before the parent's willful ignorance does any further harm.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    11. Re:oh, please! by Tisha_AH · · Score: 1

      You gotta remember that there have been doomsday cults going back thousands of years. Sometimes they get a bit extreme and do the "Heaven's Gate" or "Jim Jones" routes. Ignorance and the complete denial of the facts give the folks in charge of these groups the power that they crave.

      Science is one of the most poorly misunderstood subjects in schools today. One time I convinced a tech (with a college degree in electronics) that LED's also doubled as cameras. I didn't think anything more of it but a few months later I was over at this house and he had tiny bits of black electrical tape covering every LED in his house. If you are convincing enough (or evil), (not sure if I am convincing or evil) you can make many people who are normally rational, believe some of the most outrageous claims.

      Yea, the folks who sell off all of their possessions and go hang out on a mountaintop waiting for doomsday are probably not quite in sync with most people. The measure of sanity vs. insanity is what the majority believes in. At the pace it is going, those of us who laugh this off today will be called "deniers" and considered insane.

      --
      Tisha Hayes
    12. Re:oh, please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck with that. Ever try to convince a religious fanatic that THEY were wrong? Same brain pathways.

    13. Re:oh, please! by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      "Science is one of the most poorly misunderstood subjects in schools today. One time I convinced a tech (with a college degree in electronics) that LED's also doubled as cameras. I didn't think anything more of it but a few months later I was over at this house and he had tiny bits of black electrical tape covering every LED in his house. If you are convincing enough (or evil), (not sure if I am convincing or evil) you can make many people who are normally rational, believe some of the most outrageous claims."

      Some people don't need convincing, or convince themselves. Part of my job is dealing with refrigeration. We recently did a rebuild on a walk-in freezer because it frosted up too much - as in, locking up motors, etc. When we were finished, the freezer STILL iced up, though not as badly. When we went back and looked at the situation, we noticed that the surrounding area was very humid, and that's what was causing it. Nonsense, replied the maintenance staff - the freezer has a leak somewhere and is making the ice (preemptive note to wise-asses - not water cooled). In the half hour meeting that followed, nothing we said - no water lines near by, no freon leaks detected, occurrence tracks outdoor humidity - deterred them from the belief that the freezer was making the ice like an ice machine.

      Until a member of our team (ex Navy chief)pointed to his bottle of Coke on the table. The cap was still sealed, and it was covered in water droplets, with a sizable puddle forming. He then asked where THAT water came from - perhaps it leaked through the plastic? The reason they were so unwilling to believe that the humidity in the area was too high was because then it would be THEIR problem, not the refrigeration installer's.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    14. Re:oh, please! by kmac06 · · Score: 1

      Maybe he knew that an LED is essentially the same as a photodiode. Of course a one-pixel camera isn't going to do anyone any good...and it'd be one hell of a hacking job to take over a DVD player and rewire the connections.

    15. Re:oh, please! by vlm · · Score: 1

      One time I convinced a tech (with a college degree in electronics) that LED's also doubled as cameras.

      The best BS is the BS with a bit of truth... Depending on the color (which depends on the materials) they make a cruddy, high capacitance very low efficiency photodiode (a light sensor, essentially a 1-D camera). Interestingly, for some weird quantum reason, the color they emit is not necessarily the color they are most sensitive at (and I'm not just talking about the phosphor based emitters).

      If you are convincing enough (or evil), (not sure if I am convincing or evil) you can make many people who are normally rational, believe some of the most outrageous claims.

      You know, in the good old days, you would have founded a major world religion, but here you are F-ing around with LEDs... apply yourself!

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    16. Re:oh, please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he read the 9/11 Commission's report, which you apparently haven't.

    17. Re:oh, please! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      It could, but you'd need a data projector or equivalent to go along with it, and the victim might notice the flickering patterns of light being projected onto him.

    18. Re:oh, please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It worked out pretty well for L. Ron.

      Anon because I don't want to be audited R2-45.

    19. Re:oh, please! by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

      Just for kicks, you might try convincing your uncle that the planet Niribu was involved in 9/11.

    20. Re:oh, please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be 0-D. A point.

      1D needs a row of pixels (x coordinate). 2D is a normal PC screen (x,y).

    21. Re:oh, please! by Alsee · · Score: 1

      You could mock up a fake 'rocket' out of an old Disney ride and see how long you could keep them believing they were in a space ship.

      Hell, at that point you might as well just tell her that the life support system is powered by blowjobs.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  23. Proper responses: by R2.0 · · Score: 1

    Unhelpful Truth: "Please do so, and take yourself out of the gene pool."

    Helpful Truth: "I completely understand your position. Make an appointment with your doctor and just say you have some health concerns (no need for the staff to get into your business.) Then explain the situation to the doctor, and he can help you take the appropriate steps."

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    1. Re:Proper responses: by alexborges · · Score: 1

      Corollary to helpful truth: get a script for a bag of Kush, enjoy the ride.

      --
      NO SIG
  24. $65 million? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    wow, just think of all the sequel opportunities

    oh... yeah, never mind

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:$65 million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      considering you can't even get your crap film out of the gate? i think that's funnier and more insightful than 20 of your posts put together.

    2. Re:$65 million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  25. Award Candidates Abound in 2012 by Njoyda+Sauce · · Score: 1

    Should be a good year for the Darwin Awards.

    --

    You can only be young once, but you can be immature forever.
  26. Commit suicide if you fear planet Nibiru? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, do us all a favor.
    Tnxbai

  27. When should I kill myself? by vanyel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Before you breed...

    1. Re:When should I kill myself? by gabereiser · · Score: 1

      yeah... like as if you really need an excuse. If you are thinking of committing suicide, odds are the movie isn't the reason why you have those thoughts. I say, since so many people are becoming dumber, let 'em rid the world of ignorance and stupidity.

    2. Re:When should I kill myself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm kinda surprised at the number of sociopathic posts in this thread.(even for Slashdot...)

      Why is the 'stupid people deserve to die anyway' crowd so large here? How is that previous statement any less abhorrent than:

      'all people of X race deserve to die'
      'all people who dont have genes as superior as mine deserve to die'
      'all people who are physically disabled in any way deserve to die'

      I'd rather be surrounded by loving, well meaning idiots than intelligent malevolent douche bags. Ironically perhaps, ignorance is all people are displaying when they chant such hateful bullshit.

      Yes I know some are joking. But I'd guess a scary majority of them are not...

    3. Re:When should I kill myself? by kenj0418 · · Score: 1

      I'd rather be surrounded by loving, well meaning idiots than intelligent malevolent douche bags.

      Well, the jokes on you then. You're likely to be surrounded with malevolent, idiot douche bags. Or maybe that's just New Jersey.

    4. Re:When should I kill myself? by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      It's not that people "deserve to die". The question is whether people deserve to be protected from their own stupidity, or from all of the vagaries that fate has dealt them. Very few people deserve death, but does that mean we, as a society, should spend whatever resources it takes to keep them from it?

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  28. Some people are too stupid. by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

    Some people are too stupid. But that is okay -- there's more then enough intelligence left for the rest of us ;)

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    1. Re:Some people are too stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you mean "more THAN enough intelligence"? Congratulations on getting the correct "too" though.

    2. Re:Some people are too stupid. by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I knew I was going to have a typo somewhere... I'm going to go hang my head in shame now.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    3. Re:Some people are too stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, why don't you help yourself to some, since there's more 'then' enough?

  29. Flattering, I guess... by iluvcapra · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is the first film I've worked on that caused actual general panic. Grudge 2 scared people, but it's actually a little gratifying to think that work I did is scaring people even AFTER they walked out of the theater. At the time we were making it I knew the whole black president/conspiracy thing was definitely going to push a lot of buttons, just considering the way things are right now, but to be honest, the whole scientific backstory of the film is so thin I never actually considered that people would genuinely fear a cataclysm as depicted in the movie. "Mutating neutrinos"... really?

    ps. I was the lead sound effects editor on the show. Along with blowing up Yellowstone and other sundry destructions, I personally cut about 80% of the computer screen beeps. And I cut every one of them just for you guys, because I know you love them so much :D

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    1. Re:Flattering, I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thank you!

    2. Re:Flattering, I guess... by raddan · · Score: 1

      It's not the beeps that get us... we can live with that... it's...

      ENHANCE

      For the love of God, if I see that again... the Earth *will* end. BTW, anyone have an earliest reference for this atrocious meme? So far, my brother and I have identified Patriot Games as the earliest reference we could find...

    3. Re:Flattering, I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Thats because this movie isn't terrifying anybody, its a marketing campaign. If 20 people are genuinely frightened out of the millions who may see it, big friggin deal. On that scale, 20 people will also be frightened to eat the popcorn, or that they caught pig flu from the guy next to them, or that aliens abducted them the night before. Its noise.

      Its no more earth shattering or scary than Independence Day.

      Some people like to believe movies and books, hence the whole Dan Brown thing. Does it matter? No, lots of stupid people out there. Its a non issue.

    4. Re:Flattering, I guess... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Does Blade Runner count? I don't think he used that exact term, but he did have a 3D photograph that could basically let him see around corners.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    5. Re:Flattering, I guess... by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 5, Funny

      I won't see the movie immediately, but I'll pre-emptively say that the beeps were entirely unnecessary, inappropriate, or plain impossible, and no programmer worth their salt would make an interface that noisy. But I'm sure you were just following orders. You know who else was just following orders?

      Seriously, I'm going to see it just for the beeps now, cos I'm intrigued how an informed person would accomplish this task as opposed to the mindless goons who think they know how computers work.

    6. Re:Flattering, I guess... by vilms · · Score: 0

      Patriot Games? Pah! Blade Runner had ENHANCE a whole decade earlier: Deckard and the low-res photo of the apartment, for example...

    7. Re:Flattering, I guess... by radtea · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but to be honest, the whole scientific backstory of the film is so thin I never actually considered that people would genuinely fear a cataclysm as depicted in the movie. "Mutating neutrinos"... really?

      Yeah, I can't even hate you for working on it, nor the producers et al for creating it. It's just a movie, after all, so you don't fall into anything like the same class as the people who are promoting the 2012 thing as fact for their own benefit.

      If anyone ends up killing themselves or ruining their lives, it'll be at the feet of those bastards, not artists and businesspeople who are honestly trying to make a buck piggy-backing on the phenomenon. You lot have pursued the only honourable way of profiting from this kind of idiocy, and more power to you.

      That given, my question is: if we have people who want to ban cell phones because of zero evidence that they emit any harmful radiation, when will see a movement to ban panic-mongers? Panic-mongers do cause demonstrable harm and in the case of the LHC black-hole lies are known to have precipiated at least one death (a teenage girl who committed suicide.) So while artists making clearly absurd fiction ("mutating neutrinos"?) are in the clear, I think we should be looking very carefully at how to come down hard on panic-mongers. They are far more dangerous than any of the ridiculous threats they promote.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    8. Re:Flattering, I guess... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      "Mutating neutrinos"... really?

      Of course. Something with that many big words will surely end the world.

    9. Re:Flattering, I guess... by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      He did actually use the word "enhance" in Blade Runner... my first concrete memory of the "what the hell?" photo enhancing was in Sneakers, however that film is beyond any reproach, as far as I'm concerend.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    10. Re:Flattering, I guess... by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      What about the teletype sounds while things are being displayed on a CRT? You must have left those in. How can we tell that it's a computer display without the teletype sounds? I'm always confused using my PC because it refuses to make those necessary sounds. I always suspect that there's just a midget hiding in that little box.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    11. Re:Flattering, I guess... by iluvcapra · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You put the beeps in for the same reason the male actors wear makeup, and scenes at night always are in blue light. It's a convention. If you make things blink on a 100 foot projection screen and they don't make a sound, people's get distracted by the absence somehow.

      As someone who does this for a living but also is a hobbyist Objective-C/Cocoa/Ruby developer, I do find myself thinking about whether the beeps are triggered by key events, or if they should be emanating from windowserver, and we absolutely put some thought into the design of "Informational" versus "Alert" versus "Fatal" indicator beeps...

      Also airplane cockpits are a whole other deal!

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    12. Re:Flattering, I guess... by iluvcapra · · Score: 4, Funny

      You'll love it. Even the progress bars beep!

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    13. Re:Flattering, I guess... by ArbitraryDescriptor · · Score: 1

      It's not the beeps that get us... we can live with that... it's... ENHANCE
      BTW, anyone have an earliest reference for this atrocious meme? So far, my brother and I have identified Patriot Games as the earliest reference we could find...

      It pains me to say it, but I'm pretty sure patient zero was Blade Runner. I'll understand if you're experiencing a lot of confusing emotions right now.

    14. Re:Flattering, I guess... by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I was going to blow the film off as a Y2K 2.0 type film. Now I'll wait till it gets to the $3.00 ticket movie theater. Break a Leg. Just as a foot note, the Mayan's equate the end of their calendar as like December 31st. The calendar just starts over.

    15. Re:Flattering, I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      > "Mutating neutrinos"... really?

      Well, that does occur in nature. Neutrinos emanating from our sun change type on the way here. Until a few years ago this was not known. The missing neutrino count from the sun (compared to theoretical predictions) was a big mystery in astrophysics, which is now explained by neutrinos changing type.

    16. Re:Flattering, I guess... by iluvcapra · · Score: 2, Informative

      Consider seeing it in Dolby Digital :) I don't get any more money either way, but seeing it at the $3 theater is almost worse than seeing it at home. Movies like this don't really work unless you're being actually pummeled by the sound and projection.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    17. Re:Flattering, I guess... by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      The day the Earth stood still?
      I'm sure there were other earlier films along the same line.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    18. Re:Flattering, I guess... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just as a foot note, the Mayan's equate the end of their calendar as like December 31st. The calendar just starts over.

      Just as a footnote to your footnote, the only character in the movie who relates the end-of-the-world to the Mayans is a complete nutjob (played very well by Woody Harrelson). The rest of the cast is much too busy running and screaming and dying to worry much about the Mayans' prophetic ability.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    19. Re:Flattering, I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Mayan's what? His cat?

    20. Re:Flattering, I guess... by thewiz · · Score: 1

      ...I never actually considered that people would genuinely fear a cataclysm as depicted in the movie.

      Ever hear about a radio broadcast called "War of the Worlds"? Did you hear about the panic it caused?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_the_worlds

      Some people will panic just because someone tells them to or they can't distinguish reality from fantasy.

      --
      If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
    21. Re:Flattering, I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being the janitor doesn't mean you "worked on the film."

    22. Re:Flattering, I guess... by Shagg · · Score: 1

      Just as a footnote to your footnote, the only character in the movie who relates the end-of-the-world to the Mayans is a complete nutjob (played very well by Woody Harrelson).

      Unfortunately, the theater is full of nutjobs too.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    23. Re:Flattering, I guess... by joggle · · Score: 1

      Cut in this case means add, not removed, right? Movie terminology often confuses me...

      Along similar lines, what in the world does the 'best boy' do on the movie? Is he like the local eagle scout doing good deeds for the actors during the movie or something?? :) (I really don't have a clue what the guy does, just always see one listed in the credits)

    24. Re:Flattering, I guess... by molo · · Score: 1

      I personally cut about 80% of the computer screen beeps. And I cut every one of them just for you guys, because I know you love them so much :D

      Thank you! Now please get hired for every other movie and show on TV. :)

      -molo

      --
      Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
    25. Re:Flattering, I guess... by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up.

    26. Re:Flattering, I guess... by iluvcapra · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I can't even hate you for working on it, nor the producers et al for creating it. It's just a movie, after all, so you don't fall into anything like the same class as the people who are promoting the 2012 thing as fact for their own benefit.

      I always saw the whole "destruction of the world" as sortof an excuse to have a movie about a "conspiracy to save humanity." The interesting part of the movie isn't necessarily how Los Angeles is destroyed as much as why people in government and in echelons of the super-wealthy keep it a secret. That's what the movie is really about, and it's something that will probably get more examination over time, as the film settles into its place in film history.

      When I started on the film last year, the election was still going on and the whole "conspiracy" of 2012 seemed very redolent of the TARP bailout, and of typically American debates about state power and prerogatives in general (note that the film was written and shot long before the October crash, or Lehman Bros. or any of the government responses to the Great Recession). Roland E. is quite liberal, and his way of squaring the circle of the state-individual conflict is by offering altruism as the only way of escaping (1) zero-sum battles for survival on the one hand, as personified by the Yuri character, and (2) state coercion, as personified by Anheuser/Oliver Platt. In the end, the conflict created by the destruction of the Earth becomes a means for the government to become secretive and corrupt, and for the wealthy to settle their personal grudges with people not-so-wealthy; the conspiracy to "contain panic" appears rational from thwe outset, but once it becomes clear it must be implemented, it's revealed to be nakedly inequitable and evil, and a complete abrogation of universal human values.

      Yes, I've watched this movie several hundred times now and have had a lot of time to think about it.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    27. Re:Flattering, I guess... by iluvcapra · · Score: 2, Informative
      A "best boy" is either:
      • The first assistant to the Key Grip, who is the head of the grip department. These are guys that pick up and carry things around, like a film's 24-hour staff moving service -- film equipment, sets, props and photographic equipment are often bulky and unweildy. The best boy grip's main job is to sit at the truck and keep inventory on all of the gear, make sure the grips show up on time, make sure nothing is broken and repairs get done, etc.
      • The first assistant to the Gaffer, who is the chief electrician on set. A best boy in this case is usually called "best boy electric" and does the same sort of thing the best boy grip does, except with the lighting equipment.

      There's some variance throughout the world, but this is the typical doctrine for union US film sets.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    28. Re:Flattering, I guess... by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 1

      I personally cut about 80% of the computer screen beeps. And I cut every one of them just for you guys, because I know you love them so much

      Thank you. We appreciate it.

      --
      Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
    29. Re:Flattering, I guess... by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      It's a little more complicated than that. 2012 is more like Y2K - there's an actual event involved, and it's occurrence isn't in question. I knew the digits on my digital watch were going to change at that point in history, and I know that the Mayan calender ends it's cycle as well. It's the significance of those events that people wildly over estimate. The logically challenged have no problem believing that Independence Day was a fantasy because aliens are not established fact. But they have a problem with conditional logic: Someone presents them with "If A then B" and they think "OMG! A is true, then B must be true too!". Of course it ignores both logic and meaning, but it feels right.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    30. Re:Flattering, I guess... by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your hard work on a movie I have no intention of seeing. Please in the future try to get a similar job on a movie that makes sense so I can appreciate your work.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    31. Re:Flattering, I guess... by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      "a complete nutjob (played very well by Woody Harrelson)"

      That's redundant on so many levels...

      (Although I did enjoy his work in Zombieland.)

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    32. Re:Flattering, I guess... by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      Give Hurt Locker a try in that case.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    33. Re:Flattering, I guess... by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      Plus mutating means evolution. That's the devil's science.

    34. Re:Flattering, I guess... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the theater is full of nutjobs too.

      Apparently. I have a hard time imagining why, since this is just another disaster movie. Better special effects, perhaps, but still just a genre disaster movie.

      But there's only one thing that is truly infinite in this universe, and that's stupidity.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    35. Re:Flattering, I guess... by joggle · · Score: 1

      Thanks. And I was correct in my understanding of how you used 'cut' right? I think some other posters are misreading your statement with the understanding that you removed 80% of the beeping noises from the movie :)

      As far as I know, 'cut' only means 'add/create' in movie lingo. The use of it anywhere else in English means the complete opposite (well, in this case anyway. Obviously you weren't dividing beeping noises as a fabric of some kind :P ).

    36. Re:Flattering, I guess... by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 3, Funny

      Blade Runner pretty much invented that cliche. I only wish an imitator would make the chucka-chucka-chucka sound when the character pans the image around.

      Sound guy, you on that?

    37. Re:Flattering, I guess... by iluvcapra · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As far as I know, 'cut' only means 'add/create' in movie lingo.

      Yeah, oh well. I added them, and then the re-recording mixer tossed out gobs of them, circle of life.

      "Cut" means I added it, in the sense that "I found these sounds in the library and then I 'cut' them so that they would sync up with the picture." Something about CGI special effects is that if you used the literal on-set sound of every shot in the movie, 2012 would be about 50% dialogue, 50% render farm fan hum.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    38. Re:Flattering, I guess... by iluvcapra · · Score: 3, Informative

      It has been brought to my attention that people think I cut beeps out of the movie, based on the common English interpretation of the verb 'to cut.' I probably should have made it clear that I cut them "into" the movie, in accordance with the idiomatic Hollywood usage of the phrase. We apologize for the inconvenience. Flame on.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    39. Re:Flattering, I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one cares about your job, bro.

    40. Re:Flattering, I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Panic-mongers do cause demonstrable harm and in the case of the LHC black-hole lies are known to have precipiated at least one death (a teenage girl who committed suicide.)

      Oh, my god, there are panic-mongers among us? What are we to do? How will we handle them? We're doomed!

    41. Re:Flattering, I guess... by bakawally · · Score: 1

      hooray for fellow soundies on slashdot. (although I am on the production end and usually only have to deal with post when they call us up about something or other)

    42. Re:Flattering, I guess... by Dr.+Sp0ng · · Score: 1

      You'll love it. Even the progress bars beep!

      Oh. So you're that guy.

    43. Re:Flattering, I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, the theater is full of nutjobs too.

      And now, a brazillion Slashdotters stampede to the nearest theatre in hopes of getting one of these nutjobs . . .

    44. Re:Flattering, I guess... by rudib · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've watched this movie several hundred times now

      I'm sorry.

    45. Re:Flattering, I guess... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      The interesting part of the movie isn't necessarily how Los Angeles is destroyed as much as why people in government and in echelons of the super-wealthy keep it a secret. That's what the movie is really about, and it's something that will probably get more examination over time, as the film settles into its place in film history.

      It'll settle somewhere on the list of "films that pandered to current hysteria with a superficial political plot but which are now meaningless" In ten years, like so many others of it's ilk it will be all but forgotten. It'll fill the nights on AMC or TNN when some other channel has a real ratings draw and there's nothing better to show or when one of the stars kicks the bucket. If you're lucky, in twenty years it'll be featured in a book on the hysterics of this era.
       

      Yes, I've watched this movie several hundred times now and have had a lot of time to think about it.

      The longer you have to think about something, the longer you have to start seeing things that aren't there.

    46. Re:Flattering, I guess... by iluvcapra · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What's wierd is it's the same chucka-chucka you hear in Alien when the Nostromo computer receives new orders, and it also pops up in various parts of Brazil, The Black Hole, Logan's Run etc. I think it's an old Bernoulli drive or some kind of dishwasher hard disk. You can hear what we're talking about it on the Amazon.com website, just audition track 1 of the Blade Runner soundtrack.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    47. Re:Flattering, I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

        I have to mock a progress bar for a client once. They wanted it not only to beep, but to play tones in increasing frequency. Horrible.

        These things happen people.

    48. Re:Flattering, I guess... by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      Along with blowing up Yellowstone and other sundry destructions,

      That reminded me... I wonder if someone's going to make a movie about the Yellowstone supervolcano that's supposedly overdue to explode and choke everyone to death with a planetwide dust cloud. Unlike this, that one's got a bit of scientific weight behind it...

    49. Re:Flattering, I guess... by anegg · · Score: 1

      Interesting that you bring those sounds up. The DEC VT52 video terminal actually made sounds like a teletype when characters were being displayed on the screen. I always assumed the sound effect was to help folks with the transition from the ASR33s and such to the wonderful world of video terminals. Modern computers don't have the ability anymore, sadly enough.

    50. Re:Flattering, I guess... by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but their calender COUNTS DOWN. And as everyone knows from Hollywood, everything that's explosive (besides helicopters), has a big countdown timer on it.

    51. Re:Flattering, I guess... by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 1

      2012 would be about 50% dialogue, 50% render farm fan hum.

      Just what is wrong with that!

      And you call yourself a nerd. Pshaw.

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    52. Re:Flattering, I guess... by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      My computer makes noise when progress bars move and when you scroll windows or move them around.

      And it has absolutely nothing to do with the absolutely abysmal shielding between the integrated sound card and the sound output port, which is conveniently located right next to the graphics card.

      Although for some strange reason, the noises go away when I use a USB headset...

      (It's really annoying while playing games, though: during quiet sections, there's a continuous "buzz" from the graphics card. Which is part of the reason why I have a USB headset.)

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    53. Re:Flattering, I guess... by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      But they have a problem with conditional logic: Someone presents them with "If A then B" and they think "OMG! A is true, then B must be true too!". Of course it ignores both logic and meaning, but it feels right.

      Uh ... Modus ponens? That logic sure feels right to me.

    54. Re:Flattering, I guess... by mog007 · · Score: 1

      That very observation was the evidence used to show that neutrinos were not traveling at the speed of light, and thus, they have mass.

    55. Re:Flattering, I guess... by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      Dammit, I was thinking of affirming the consequent.

      Of course, from the standpoint of practical logic/rhetoric, there's so much wrong with "If the Mayan Calendar ends, then the world will end" that I don't really know where to start.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    56. Re:Flattering, I guess... by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      It's not the beeps that get us... we can live with that... it's...

      the blinking, beeping, and flashing lights, blinking and beeping and flashing - they're *flashing* and they're *beeping*. I can't stand it anymore! They're *blinking* and *beeping* and *flashing*! Why doesn't somebody pull the plug!

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    57. Re:Flattering, I guess... by raddan · · Score: 1

      Well, at least I got the actor right. I guess this one just follows Harrison Ford around.

    58. Re:Flattering, I guess... by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      It's probably some sort of grounding problem in your speakers...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    59. Re:Flattering, I guess... by Alsee · · Score: 1

      The progress bar beeps? Pffft! My mute button beeps.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    60. Re:Flattering, I guess... by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      Doubt it, since I had the same problems with my headphones (non-USB) when plugged into the headphone jack on the front of the machine. (Although in that case, there was a long wire that plugged into a special port on the MB and then ran in front of a whole bunch of noisy electronics to make it to the front of the case.)

      Although my speakers did die, so, you might be on to something...

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    61. Re:Flattering, I guess... by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      I guess when I said "speakers" I meant "analogue audio port." Some cheaper mobos use the data ground, instead of a dedicated signal ground, for the shield audio ground. Bad idea. If the shield ground on the audio out is accessible, try putting a small capacitor (like picofarads) serially between the audio port and the ground rail to kill any DC that might be on the data ground.

      It's not surprising that the buzz would go away with USB headphones, because the DAC in the USB adaptor is electronically isolated from the USB shield. I wouldn't be surprised if the audio shield to your headphones was left floating on the USB side.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    62. Re:Flattering, I guess... by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      You know what, that's a terrible idea. Put BIG caps on the signal leads first, then try just floating the ground. Don't cap the ground.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  30. Other nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  31. Two Words by bradgoodman · · Score: 1

    "Natural Selection".

    1. Re:Two Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was my first though.

  32. Remember The War of The Worlds? by Enleth · · Score: 1

    I mean, the original radio broadcast - it was suggestive enough to cause moderate and short-termed, but state-wide panic during the middle of the actual broadcast. People fleeing their homes, calling for emergency services and so on.

    --
    This is Slashdot. Common sense is futile. You will be modded down.
    1. Re:Remember The War of The Worlds? by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      I mean, the original radio broadcast - it was suggestive enough to cause moderate and short-termed, but state-wide panic during the middle of the actual broadcast. People fleeing their homes, calling for emergency services and so on.

      I think there's a huge difference personally.

      More than half the War of the Worlds radio show was in the form of a news broadcast during a time people were worried about potential war. The current state of things is a pretty good example of how it's not hard to make scared people more scared, especially when you use a medium that's also used for news. This movie is only in theaters and its message of doom and gloom is not on any news channels in any meaningful form.

      If people are seriously considering stockpiling supplies and/or killing themselves before the inevitable destruction of the world as we know it those same people should not be allowed in theaters due to their inability to distinguish fiction from fact.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    2. Re:Remember The War of The Worlds? by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      those same people should not be allowed in theaters due to their inability to distinguish fiction from fact.

      Oh... Like Republicans?

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    3. Re:Remember The War of The Worlds? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Oh... Like Republicans?

      Like all 'ans, 'ats, 'ists, 'als, and all other sorts of religious loons.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    4. Re:Remember The War of The Worlds? by anegg · · Score: 1

      Perhaps more like those people who seem to think they can accurately describe an entire group of people with one label like "Republicans"

  33. Stop listening to Hollywood! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who fears the end of the world because of a stupid Hollywood movie. May I recommend self reduction. Avoid the rush.

  34. please, do kill yourself by spidercoz · · Score: 1

    if you think that is an appropriate response to a fucking movie about a half-assed myth, then by all means, do the world a favor

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
  35. Why is NASA answering Hollywood Questions? by Sleen · · Score: 1

    Why is NASA answering these questions some of which surely are just jokes? Can't they tell the difference? Why is it NASAs' job to handle this? They must have better things to do and obviously whatever they thought they were doing trying to educate people HAS NOT WORKED. Not that educating isn't important, but instead of the symptom, go for the cure? NASA is not it...

    I've said it before but not here, there should be laws called crimes against reality and the movie should have a disclaimer stating that as entertainment it has no bearing other than appearance to the planet earth and the world we call home.

    When really bad weather happens governors can declare state of emergency to get money. Old buildings fall down, things must get rebuilt, but what about damage to minds? Isn't there some sort of rational response that should be made when we become aware of a vast swath of ignorant people? I think the responses to this movie are quite scary, in fact terrifying. And if this isn't proof that the US education system only produces reliable tax payers, what else is?

    NASA get back to work! Your friends in the government are producing meat to pay taxes and won't stop until individuals become property again. Do your jobs which is managing space and research, not the stupidity of people who eat popcorn.

    1. Re:Why is NASA answering Hollywood Questions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Why is NASA answering Hollywood Questions? by Aladrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The real crime is that you think it is okay for people to assume movies have any relation to reality to begin with. ALL movies would have your disclaimer, making it worthless.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    3. Re:Why is NASA answering Hollywood Questions? by Sleen · · Score: 1

      Hi thanks for the link! So, you don't see the NASA interest in climate research to be opportunistic and an attempt to remain relevant? Maybe we can get NASA involved with fixing the rail system since its on planet earth and NASA studies planets.

      The climate topic is popular thanks to a MOVIE and NASA has a position. Good thing too because its not really clear what they are doing in space.

      How much research is funded by non military sources in oceanography?

      I think I would see things differently if NASA actually produced things and had some kind of accountability or real competitive motivation. But like so many US agencies they are just a regulator in this case the space regulator. And like the response to the climate movie, they have a position on threats from OUTER SPACE. Never mind this makes too much sense.... ...I retract my question!

      Maybe they are perfect for the job of answering ignorant questions stemming from entertainment. In the meantime we should wonder what to do about the recent near miss and why it got so close before anyone noticed. I have way more confidence in citizen astronomers than the amtrack of space.

      I think NASA is considering how to benefit rather than really address the problem of ignorance. They have to survive like any other in a non competitive system of fixed wealth.

    4. Re:Why is NASA answering Hollywood Questions? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Why is NASA answering these questions some of which surely are just jokes?

      I'm not with NASA but the answer seems obvious to me, but it must not be obvious to everyone or your question wouldn't be redundant. Someone else asked it earlier and I already answered it.

      Can't they tell the difference?

      Yes, but the general public can't.

      Why is it NASAs' job to handle this?

      Where elase will you find so many astronomers and astrophysicists?

      Not that educating isn't important, but instead of the symptom, go for the cure?

      Education IS the cure. The disease is ignorance.

      there should be laws called crimes against reality

      I'm glad you're not a legislator. You would outlaw fiction.

      what about damage to minds?

      You're a member of the Partnership for a Drug Free America, aren't you? And drugs aside, I'm a big fan of a good mindfuck.

      Isn't there some sort of rational response that should be made when we become aware of a vast swath of ignorant people?

      Do you work for the department of redundancy department? NASA's rebuttal of this nonsense IS the rational response to nonsense that people believe.

      Do your jobs which is managing space and research

      Then bye bye NASA picture of the day and all the other good things I find at nasa.gov then.

    5. Re:Why is NASA answering Hollywood Questions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why is NASA answering these questions some of which surely are just jokes? Can't they tell the difference?"

      I can't tell the difference. I've met people who really believe the earth will end in 2012. None of them talked about offing themselves before the event, but it's not a big stretch of the imagination to see that some people really would, if they believed the world was about to end in a horrible way. I mean, we have historical records of people killing themselves for similar reasons.

      The problem is poe's law. There's no set of beliefs so bizarre that some couldn't hold them, and there's often no way to tell the difference from a single e-mail. Could you really justify letting someone kill themselves *and* their children because they were probably joking?

    6. Re:Why is NASA answering Hollywood Questions? by Sleen · · Score: 1

      Overall I see more of a domestic than space mindset and it is cultivating the favors it needs to survive instead of really being competitive and aggressive about being in space.

      The people at NASA are all personally heroes, but I can see them taking on a higher role and purpose. It just seems undignified for NASA to be involved with such extreme cases. Honorable in so many ways but darn it, a shame.

      I can't imagine anyone from NASA would even be reading these posts. There are so many of them and even my own words are examples of extreme ignorance!

      The social side of space I imagine contains some matter/antimatter like combinations that I have only recently considered. Like some party systems boiling down to the tar of 2 choices I think there are people who are either thumbs up or down on space. And like many things in my surroundings the one I choose is in the minority with billions on the opposing side. Like hamburgers, people who voted for stupidity, people who pay for stupidity, people who listen to stupidity. There is this experience of marginalization we come across these days because of the internet and the flux and over abundance of information and profiles - the exposure to other peoples' information and representations. I think there is way too much science fiction about space for many people to be realistic and this shows there is interest in the markets and anthropologically where we might see ourselves heading. But really?

      Watching NASA TV is pretty easy, but its not my favorite channel. I could imagine a reality show based in space for contractors who make it out there to study yes, but produce. Engage, process, defend. New information, new places and new stories. The cloak and dagger baggage of secrets, disclosure and the shroud of the military is dark and sad like the middle ages. Its not about kingdoms, nations, agency and enmity but about life and people.

      I'll do my part and broadcast for a few weeks that movie 2012 is just pretend and while it brings up some interesting questions such as how you might behave under those conditions and totally give up in despair it is hollywood rubbish and no matter how many people say a disclaimer is not needed let us remind that full theatrical resolution rendering of content in realtime is almost currently possible on a single video card. A disclaimer could warn of the use of perfect CGI to easily supercede the audience sense of pretend. A crime against reality has always existed and it is understood well in the animal kingdom. When reality is veiled, shunted, warped distorted when a clear and self presenting form is possible, then it is justified for a social institution to intervene and without this adaptation the information age is without optimization.

      I really don't think NASA should find these questions acceptable. There are good questions and there are bad questions. Scientists ask good questions, hollywood producers do not. NASA has no business answering questions designed by hollywood. They should fashion their own questions and get answers.

    7. Re:Why is NASA answering Hollywood Questions? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      have a disclaimer stating that as entertainment

      NO, IT SHOULDN'T.

      If you can't distinguish between the movie and reality you don't deserve to live.

      This movie isn't playing to tribes in the Amazon with no education. Its playing in reasonably education areas of the world where there is no excuse for taking this as reality.

      I'd have a problem with taking some people from the jungle who have never seen a tv or motion picture or the like and letting them react to such a movie without making it utterly clear before hand, but thats not whats going on here. This is no different than people picking up running lawn mowers to trim their hedges and losing their fingers.

      The vast majority of people educated in the 'US education system' know better than to believe this crap, even if they don't know anything about astrophysics or mutating neutrinos.

      STOP TRYING TO PROTECT MORONS FROM THEMSELVES.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  36. Oblig Movie Quote by Croakus · · Score: 3, Funny

    There's always an Arquillian Battle Cruiser, or a Corillian Death Ray, or an intergalactic plague that is about to wipe out all life on this miserable little planet, and the only way these people can get on with their happy lives is that they Do... Not... Know about it!

    1. Re:Oblig Movie Quote by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      Or a Wookie Life Day. *danger chord*

    2. Re:Oblig Movie Quote by rbochan · · Score: 1

      I just don't want to have to buy the White Album again!

      --
      ...Rob
      The American Dream isn't an SUV and a house in the suburbs; it's Don't Tread On Me.
    3. Re:Oblig Movie Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm thinking more in lines of a giant space goat and the "B" ark at this point...

    4. Re:Oblig Movie Quote by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      That plague? It'll start with an unsanitised public telephone.

      Bad things can happen when you rid yourselves of one-third of the population, or as some might say, "a load of useless bloody loonies."

  37. OMG! by jack_n_jill · · Score: 1, Funny
    OMG the calendar on my wall, (ON MY WALL!), ends on December 31 2009!
    WE WON'T MAKE IT TO 2012!

    Ps; Since you won't need your money any more please send it to me. Hurry; there are only 6 weeks left!

    1. Re:OMG! by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      I spend all my money and bought a new calender.

  38. More Popularity? by Silpher · · Score: 1

    Actually this could make NASA more popular or interesting because if they debunk this 2012 crap like a dad explains his boy, woman aren't flesh eating medusas people might feel some more respect?

    1. Re:More Popularity? by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Like people got more respect for the mainstream scientific community because Y2K fizzled?

      rj

  39. This is part of NASA's purvey. by Jack9 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ignorance is not stupidity. NASA has addressed the ignorance. Good for them.

    --

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.
    Everyone knows me.
    1. Re:This is part of NASA's purvey. by raddan · · Score: 1

      True, but it's not like Hollywood movies are known to be purveyors of fine facts. If this is the first movie you've ever seen, well, OK, I suppose it might be ignorance, but if you've seen a couple of them and you still believe it, I think that falls squarely in the stupid category.

      But, yeah, good for NASA. They should put 'combating ignorance' on their "What have we done for you lately?" page.

    2. Re:This is part of NASA's purvey. by Jack9 · · Score: 1

      but if you've seen a couple of them and you still believe it

      Seen a couple of what? Movies? It's the media, at large, who has pushed this low grade panic. Ex-NASA "scientists" on the Syfy to NBC news. Since people cannot disprove that there is an impending disaster (just another fear they cannot understand) and see "infotainment" mirroring fiction, is it irrational to feel sorry for the Earth in addition to themselves? I think not. They are simply mislead and ignorant. The fear is real enough. The uncertainty persistent. It's not a surprise that FUD works.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
    3. Re:This is part of NASA's purvey. by Insightfill · · Score: 1

      Ignorance is not stupidity. NASA has addressed the ignorance. Good for them.

      Repeated ignorance, is stupidity, however. Falling for a "419 scam" once, is ignorance. Falling for a second is stupidity. "Ignorance" is "doesn't know", while "stupidity" is "won't know."

      Or, as our former president once said: "Fool me once..."

      I'm glad NASA is looking at this, but saddened that they have to.

    4. Re:This is part of NASA's purvey. by Deanalator · · Score: 1

      The strange thing is that I watched all the nasa people doing their talk show rounds saying that there is no planet X and it's not going to crash into earth, but the 2012 movie had nothing to do with that.

      *spoiler etc (not sure if you really care)*

      In the 2012 movie, a massive surge in solar flare activity causes some sort of neutrino spike in the core of the earth. This heats up the core to the point where the crust starts melting. The crust gets thinner and thinner which increases seismic activity, and eventually, California sinks, Yellowstone erupts, the poles flip, and all the continents rearrange themselves in the course of a 48 hour catastrophic event. Not quite scientifically sound, but far more realistic than some planet X scenario.

      You know that scene in action movies where people run out of a building as it's exploding, and at the last second they jump in the air as the shockwave of the explosion pushes them out of the way just in time? Imagine that continuously for an hour and a half. There is a part where they are flying an airplane trying to escape LA, and a subway train flies out of the broken ground right at them. If you think of the movie as a comedy, it's much more enjoyable, and just about as epic as snakes on a plane.

    5. Re:This is part of NASA's purvey. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignorance is not stupidity. NASA has addressed the ignorance..

      Indeed. The stupidity, on the other hand, remains.

    6. Re:This is part of NASA's purvey. by adamchou · · Score: 1

      Ignorance is the lack of knowledge. The inability to differentiate between hollywood fiction and reality isn't a lack of knowledge. Thats just plain stupidity.

    7. Re:This is part of NASA's purvey. by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      This is part of NASA's purvey

      I think you mean purview.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    8. Re:This is part of NASA's purvey. by Jack9 · · Score: 1

      Purview is similar, but not precisely what I wanted to say. NASA's purview (scope) is beyond these reassurances, but to provide evidence and findings is part of their purvey (what is supplied).

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
    9. Re:This is part of NASA's purvey. by raddan · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Guess I missed that. No TV, see.

    10. Re:This is part of NASA's purvey. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its a verb you moron:

      http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/purvey?r=75&src=ref&ch=dic

      Proper usage would be "purveyance". Or even "provision".

  40. Send those questions to me by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

    I'll answer the questions and I won't feel bad about the answers I give to stupid people.

    In a few years, the rest of you will notice there's a lot fewer stupid people around, and you'll thank me.

    You're welcome.

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  41. It's easy, I'd have no problem with it at all ;-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I don't know how to answer those questions.

    Let me help you out on this one: "It's a fucking movie you FUCKING IDIOT! Fiction, make-believe, pretend. You know what fiction is, right? YOU FUCKING IDIOT!"

    You may laugh, but I really do think that in most cases that would reassure the person asking the question!

  42. Let them kill themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And remove themselves from the gene pool.

    We do our children a service by building a future for them that includes viable mates with high-quality DNA that excludes any "very gullible, superstitious, and just plain stupid" genes.

    1. Re:Let them kill themselves by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And remove themselves from the gene pool.

      Almost no stupidity or suicidal tendancies are hereditary. Most mental disabilities are caused by accident or disease. A very large number of children are born every day with Fetal Alcohol Syndrome to (other then being alcoholics) perfectly sane, normal, intelligent people. The "Darwin Award" is pure bullshit; evolution doesn't work like that.

      If a stupid woman has fifteen kids and ten die, and you have never had sex, she won the Darwin game and you are its loser.

    2. Re:Let them kill themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well obviously. That's why we have to convince them to commit suicide before they have kids!

    3. Re:Let them kill themselves by Akira+Kogami · · Score: 1

      But stupidity could also be based on the way one is raised. Do you think someone raised by one of those morons will have any respect for scientific fact over idiotic superstition and hyperbole instilled in them?

    4. Re:Let them kill themselves by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The difference between ignorance and stupidity is that one is curable.

    5. Re:Let them kill themselves by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      "A very large number of children are born every day with Fetal Alcohol Syndrome to (other then being alcoholics) perfectly sane, normal, intelligent people."

      Point one - if they are alcoholics, they are NOT normal. That's like saying someone is in perfect health but for diabetes.

      Point two - there is a large hereditary component to alcoholism. So, from a genetic standpoint, FAS definitely qualifies a a constraint for passing on the traits of alcoholism - while it didn't stop the alcoholic from breeding, it will definitely affect the number of grandchildren an alcoholic has.

      You might want to pick a better example.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    6. Re:Let them kill themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, mental illness has a HUGE genetic component to it. Usually in the predisposed form. Its never certain, but people lean towards being mentally ill at birth. And thank you Mr. Scientologist for participating. I will now report you to some guy who calls himself Anon.

    7. Re:Let them kill themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, now THERE is a reason to commit suicide. Now where did I put that quarter...

    8. Re:Let them kill themselves by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      The "Darwin Award" is pure bullshit; evolution doesn't work like that.

      Whoosh, buddy. Whoosh!

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    9. Re:Let them kill themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...perfectly sane, normal, intelligent people.

      Bull shit. You only have a choice of 2

    10. Re:Let them kill themselves by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      You might want to pick a better example.

      Falling down while learning to walk. Being in an auto accident (shaken baby syndrome). Umbilical cord wrapped around the baby's neck at birth. There are myriad causes, few of them genetic.

      And although there is in fact a hereditary componemt to alcoholism (and other addictions), many alcoholics do in fact stop drinking. Many alcoholics do in fact produce children who never drink.

    11. Re:Let them kill themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, general stupidity can be caused by nurture. Think about that.

    12. Re:Let them kill themselves by PeteABastard · · Score: 1

      I can bullshit. Some depression has a very strong genetic component, and is associated with suicidal tendancies. Ask me how I know. Or why I have chosen not to breed.

    13. Re:Let them kill themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Stupidity alone is already a good enough reason for someone to die.

      If a stupid woman has fifteen kids and ten die, and you have never had sex, she won the Darwin game and you are its loser.

      Then we shall make it a law that so that the five remaining children WILL be hunted down and killed in the most efficient way possible.

    14. Re:Let them kill themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, u get an honorary one.
      Some people are so dumb, they would make such horrible, ineffective parents, that they should never breed, not nature, nurture. Dee dee dee!

    15. Re:Let them kill themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, if her 5 out of 10 kids survive to produce their own 5 out of 10, and they see their kids produce 5 out of 10, then the original woman has won the "darwin" game.

  43. I see potential in this by spun · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, so if you run into one of these idiots, and she happens to be cute, just tell her that you are a Mao Shan master and you know the perfect ceremony to stop Nibiru from hitting the Earth, if you could just get a little help from her...

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:I see potential in this by prefec2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And if the "ritual" have been performed in the right way (after some training of course) the planet never shows up. So you were right, weren't you. And so you are a real Mao Shan Master.

    2. Re:I see potential in this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After following the link and reading the article... the only thing the guy did wrong was not get a vasectomy as part of his Mao Shan training...

    3. Re:I see potential in this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Cute but stupid women only remain cute as long as they don't say anything. When I was 19, I took a subway and there were 2 cute chicks that I ogled. After listening to them for 5 minutes, the length of my ride, they were really ugly just based on what I had heard them say. So...

    4. Re:I see potential in this by spun · · Score: 1

      Damn straight. I'm sorry, but any 19 year old dumb enough to believe the 'suck it for good luck' line deserves what she gets.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  44. This is sad by XSpud · · Score: 1

    I find it difficult to believe that people can take something like this so seriously to the point they will end their lives. If these people do exist it's very sad that there are people out there who have no way of evaluating information to decide what's real or not. It must make their lives very difficult.

    1. Re:This is sad by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Two words: Heaven's Gate.

      rj

  45. Buy your insurance now by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 1

    I'm selling insurance for 2012. You can get it now for the limited low fee of $1,000 a year. When the world ends in 2012 you'll receive $10,000,000. Buy now, before it's too late.

  46. I don't get "It" by Zygamorph · · Score: 1
    Every year I see hundreds of calenders that stop after anywhere from 12 to 18 months and no one gets upset. Why does anyone get upset just because the Mayan calender ends at a certain date? It was probably one of two things
    1. 1. Hey George, is that the biggest rock you have in the yard, I'll only be able to carve up to 2012? Yah that's it I won't get another shipment for another 6 months, but hey I've got a good deal on these pocket rocks, I'll throw in a dozen for only ....; or
    2. 2. You want how much for over weight shipping!!! That's crazy, I'm going to get a smaller rock, so what if it only goes out to 2012, we can carve a new one a couple of centuries before this one runs out.
    1. Re:I don't get "It" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My theory: they carved their calendar in a fucking rock. Of course they're only going to do one at a time.

    2. Re:I don't get "It" by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Every year I see hundreds of calenders that stop after anywhere from 12 to 18 months and no one gets upset. Why does anyone get upset just because the Mayan calender ends at a certain date?

      I don't know where the "Mayas thought the end of the world would come on the date their calendar ended" idea came from, but once created, it's at least semi-plausible and thus unsurprising that it would spread. I mean many cultures have legends predicting the end of the world (Armageddon, Ragnarok, etc), it's hardly inconceivable that the Mayans had a specific date for theirs.

      Now why anyone would believe that the Mayans had accurately predicted to the day when the world was going to (spontaneously, apparently) come to an end, that boggles my mind.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  47. answer is clear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide. I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves. I had one last week from a person who said, "I'm so scared, my only friend is my little dog. When should I put it to sleep so it won't suffer?" And I don't know how to answer those questions.'" The answer is "Go for it". Seriously, gene pool weeding CLEARLY needs to happen. Make sure they kill their children as well.

  48. Ask an Astrologist? by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

    I first read "Ask an Astrobiologist" as "Ask an Astrologist" -- frankly, I think were NASA to set up an 'Ask an Astrologist' blog and just put up a bunch of "predictions" that the world ISN'T going to end, that they might have more lasting luck with this project.

    1. Re:Ask an Astrologist? by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Both funny and insightful. For full effect they should dress up the Astrologist as Elvis! (Or Xenu?)

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  49. No you don't by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Funny

    The economy is in a shambles and you need a job. You respond with "The FSM will return on Dec 24, 2012 and your death will be more horrible than you can imagine. The only way to prevent this fate is to kill yourself, preferably by drowning in a bowl of spagettios."

    Then you take his job after he kills himself.

    If he doesn't kill himself, drown him in a bowl of spagetti.

    1. Re:No you don't by gtall · · Score: 1

      The Spaghetti Monster might take offense at those suggestions...especially the spaghettios, now that's really hitting below the belt. Just eating those things can cause massive eruptions below the belt.

    2. Re:No you don't by publiclurker · · Score: 1

      But if he believes you then he is obviously not a very bright individual, and I'd rather not have to take a job that could be handled by someone like that as I'd quickly bore myself to death.

  50. 2200. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a giant calculation in the calendar, it's not 2012, it's 2200 !! So everything will be ok for you... it's your grand-kin who need worry about planed Nubuin. And thats the cold truth. Sha-clakee.

    1. Re:2200. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1
      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  51. World ending in 2012? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    Why would people believe the world is ending in 2012 when there's clear evidence that the Earth/mankind survive until the 23rd century?

    (Hey, if people will believe that 2012 is a documentary showing the end of the world, maybe they'll buy this!)

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    1. Re:World ending in 2012? by White+Yeti · · Score: 1

      There's other evidence to suppose that civilization will continue past 2012, at least in Hollywood.

  52. spoiler tag needed by kalirion · · Score: 1

    I didn't know the movie was about some planet collision!

    1. Re:spoiler tag needed by natehoy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm sorry, you're concerned about the PLOT of a disaster movie? The plot. Of a disaster movie. Stay where you are, the people who are arriving shortly are there to help you. They are bringing you shiny things.

      Complete spoiler: Something scientifically impossible happens. Lots of people die and the laws of physics are apparently among the first casualties. Lots more people die. A few people suffer terrible injuries but somehow recover miraculously and are therefore immunized against death for the remainder of the film. Someone who is not in a position of authority overcomes great obstacles from clueless authority figures and breaks the laws of physics to come up with an impossible solution that, despite incredible odds, kills most of the people who disagreed with his/her theory in spectacularly ironic and/or morally righteous ways, and then works. Life immediately goes back to normal for all concerned, except those who are actually dead. The sun rises on happy people whose only complaint is that most of the people they know and love have been wiped out, but otherwise they are just so happy to be part of the small group of survivors who will soon be competing for what food is left before they descend into chaos and kill each other for stale crusts. But that can wait until the sequel.

      The plot is a thin device over which special effects are generously smeared. Go watch the trailer again, and eagerly anticipate the FXfest.

      Personally, the number of sheer coincidences and complete disregard for the laws of physics presented in the trailer I watched was enough to make me wonder about the state of science. Then I use my usual tactic... "just repeat to yourself 'it's just a show, I should really just relax'".

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    2. Re:spoiler tag needed by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      Uhh yeah, pretty much what he said! Seriously, the best review I heard was from a friend who said "They spent a squillion bucks making the movie and once the special effects start, you can see where the money went." So I knew what I was in for. I expected little more than lots of big things blowing up or falling apart and making lots of big noises, and I loved it!

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    3. Re:spoiler tag needed by natehoy · · Score: 1

      I find it hard to watch movies like this one. I cannot suspend reality enough. Yet, I watch Star Trek where humanity has ended all internal conflict. Go figure.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    4. Re:spoiler tag needed by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      I find it hard to watch movies like this one. I cannot suspend reality enough. Yet, I watch Star Trek where humanity has ended all internal conflict. Go figure.

      I'm pretty much the same. I think it's because something very early on in some movies is so thoroughly unbelievable that I think "We're not in Kansas anymore, Toto." and I can enjoy it without needing to believe it.

      Now in 2012, I had my "Kansas" moment in the first scene. Our hero descends into the world's deepest copper mine via a rickety old mine elevator to find a particle physics lab in a geology lab - and no cleanroom to speak of. My "Kansas" moment was confirmed within a couple of minutes with the whole "mutating neutrinos" thing. The cause of the world's ills might as well have been a wicked witch or a martian death ray.

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    5. Re:spoiler tag needed by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      I think the award for latest Kansas moment recently goes to District 9. At times, almost believable :)

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  53. Better response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide. I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves.

    The movie was that bad?

  54. I get this sometimes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got these sorts of questions and comments during the Y2K hoopla and I've gotten some of it with this whole 2012 thing. Actually been getting questions about it since around 2004. About all I can do is point out to them that it's silly fiction and ignorance and suggest they get on with their lives.

    The sad truth is, a lot of people want the world to end; they have death wishes.

  55. here's an answer by flahwho · · Score: 1

    To the questions of suicide or putting down your dog: NOW. DO IT NOW. You will most assuredly put the rest of the world at ease.

    1. Re:here's an answer by natehoy · · Score: 1

      No, refer them to one of the dogsitting services Atheists are starting to offer. "When you get called up for the Rapture, we'll take care of your pets while you're gone!"

      I'm thinking about opening a branch office.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  56. Ridiculous and impossible by PirateBlis · · Score: 0

    2012 isn't going to end the world and wipeout man-kind. If it did, our robotic overlords would have no one to control, and that's just silly.

  57. They have convinced me - the end really is near... by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 1

    ...human society can't have too much longer when there is an appreciable number of people stupid enough to be driven to suicide by a Roland Emmerich movie.

    --
    To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
  58. All I want to know is... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    ...how do I make money off these fools?

    1. Re:All I want to know is... by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      ...how do I make money off these fools?

      Make a completely implausible movie about the end of the world in a little over three years. :p

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    2. Re:All I want to know is... by natehoy · · Score: 1

      There are a number of fields you might find profitable:

        - Nuclear fallout shelters worked well in the 60s. How about a modern variant?
        - The survivors will be reverting to an agrarian culture. You could offer courses on sharecropping, animal husbandry (be careful of your audience on that one - you might want to pick a different title for the class like "raising animals for food"), etc.
        - Guns and ammo will be big sellers to this audience. Also preserved food.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    3. Re:All I want to know is... by ProfM · · Score: 1

      ...how do I make money off these fools?

      You really need to ask Al Gore, he has it down pat.

  59. Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..saying they were contemplating committing suicide.. And I don't know how to answer those questions.

    Just say it happens in 2009 instead. Weed them out early.

  60. Wow is right by KneelBeforeZod · · Score: 1

    I know. You'd think a a gov agency ran by nerds would only watch scifi movies, not lame disaster movies. But then some people can't differentiate fact from fiction.

  61. Most people are stupid, news at 11 by fuzzylollipop · · Score: 1

    If people don't understand science then everything scientific becomes mystical. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_c6HsiixFS8

    1. Re:Most people are stupid, news at 11 by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      But, she's right! It's because of all the dihydrogen monoxide in the water! Take away the DHMO, and there will be no rainbow at all! :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  62. Re:They have convinced me - the end really is near by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    Go read about The War Of The Worlds .

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  63. this is how religions get started by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    'I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide. I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves. I had one last week from a person who said, "I'm so scared, my only friend is my little dog. When should I put it to sleep so it won't suffer?" And I don't know how to answer those questions.'"

    He should answer "As soon as possible." Put some chlorine in that gene pool. The human herd could do with some culling of the credulous.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:this is how religions get started by Grygus · · Score: 1

      The human herd could do with some culling of the credulous.

      Like all the otherwise intelligent people in this very thread so willing to believe that everyone else this stupid, you mean? We receive one anecdote and suddenly all of society is on the brink of terminal stupidity. How is that discerning and not credulous?

    2. Re:this is how religions get started by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > How is that discerning and not credulous?

      I'm discerning. You've been misled. The other guy is a credulous fool.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  64. And these people vote by MikeMo · · Score: 1

    Any wonder why we have so many problems?

  65. Not stupid, just scared by darthwader · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lots of people have commented on how incredibly stupid these people are. I don't think it's quite that simple.

    I think that they're just scared. There's so much fear in our culture, people are scared of health care, scared of a black president, scared of terrorists, scared of oil prices, scared of cell phone companies, scared of pirates (the Somalian kind), scared of pirates (the MPAA kind), scared of the RIAA and MPAA, scared of swine flu, scared of unemployment, scared of having a job that doesn't pay a living wage, scared of peanuts, scared of global warming, scared of pollution, scared of home invasions, scared of floods, earthquakes and fires, scared of nuts with guns, scared of the government taking away everyone's guns.

    Fear makes you irrational. It suppresses the "carefully think about the situation" part of your brain, and supercharges the "fight or flight" part. If people stopped to think rationally about it, they would realize it is fiction. But the fear prevents them from thinking rationally.

    We live in a constant state of fear, and our culture (or our media, depending on how you look at it) keeps giving us more reasons to be afraid.

    What we need is more reason to be hopeful, not fearful. If we remove the irrational fears about health care, presidents, terrorists, MPAA, pirates, global warming, etc., then we would also have fewer irrational fears about the planet Nimbus crashing into Earth on December 21st, 2012.

    --
    I hate it when I make a joke and I get modded "+5 insightful". Mod the stupid comments "funny", not "insightful", pleas
    1. Re:Not stupid, just scared by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      Thank-you.

      I wanted to say the same thing, except I'd have been exceptionally rude to everybody in the process.

      -FL

    2. Re:Not stupid, just scared by natehoy · · Score: 1

      +infinity Insightful.

      Actually, given your signature, make that "+infinity funny". Gotta balance out that karma somehow.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    3. Re:Not stupid, just scared by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      What we need is more reason to be hopeful, not fearful. If we remove the irrational fears about health care, presidents, terrorists, MPAA, pirates, global warming, etc., then we would also have fewer irrational fears about the planet Nimbus crashing into Earth on December 21st, 2012.

      Actually, when I think about health care, presidents, terrorists, MPAA, pirates, global warming, etc., I almost welcome Nimbus!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    4. Re:Not stupid, just scared by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      We live in a constant state of fear

      Do you? If so, you should probably seek help, rather than using it as a justification for stupid behaviour.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:Not stupid, just scared by Ifandbut · · Score: 1

      Fear = control. Keep the population fearful of something and you can keep removing their "rights". Reference: passing of the Patriot Act.

    6. Re:Not stupid, just scared by o2sd · · Score: 1

      Fear is the basis for your society. It's how the rich and powerful stay rich and powerful. If there is some collateral damage, then that will just be accepted as a necessary condition to maintain the status quo (and the Empire that pays for the status quo).

      I think it's rather amusing to point and laugh at people who are afraid of a mythical planet crashing into them when so many in your population believe that the son of a mythical sky god is coming down to Earth to raise up the faithful at the 'end of days'.

      Power, control, the matrix is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.

      --
      - Nothing to see hear.
    7. Re:Not stupid, just scared by couchslug · · Score: 1

      The FEAR is stupid. It is the product of American popular culture, which worships the stupid, fails to attack stupidity and ignorance, and out of "political correctness" fails to impress the duty to oneself not to be willfully ignorant. Our religions rule by fear and, as Alan Watts pointed out, institutionalize guilt as a virtue. If you think for yourself you are a sinner.

      Americans wantonly and morbidly wallow in stupid beliefs, and I would like to see more of those who do actually die by their own hands. The number of idiots who kill themselves can never, never be enough. Get it right people, for as Frank Zappa once sang:

      "You say there ain't no use in livin'
      It's all a waste of time
      'n you wanna throw your life away, well
      People that's just fine
      Go ahead on 'n get it over with then
      Find you a bridge 'n take a jump
      Just make sure you do it right the first time
      'cause nothin's worse than a suicide
      Chump"

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    8. Re:Not stupid, just scared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand what there's actually out there to be afraid of. I remember watching the WTC buildings fall on TV, but I'm not afraid of terrorists. I remember reading about the swine flu outbreak, but I'm not afraid of that either (For all I know I had it since I was sick with flu-like symptoms a month ago.). I don't like Obama's policies for the most part, but I'm not afraid of him either and generally think Republicans or non-Democrats are overreacting.

      Am I young, feeling invincible, and therefor stupid or does the older generation assume that the government and television personalities won't ever lie to them or distort the truth? Odds are I'm way more likely to die when I get in my car to go to work tomorrow than any of the things mentioned in my post (or yours) have any huge impact in my life.

      That might work, or we can just let those full of irrational fear remove themselves from the gene pool and hope that the trait is genetic. It may have been useful to the species survival at some point, but it may have outlived its usefulness. In that case, let nature run its course and select against it.

    9. Re:Not stupid, just scared by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      Fear makes you irrational. It suppresses the "carefully think about the situation" part of your brain, and supercharges the "fight or flight" part.

      I remember reading somewhere that a study showed fear suppresses peoples ability to think rationally while anger enhances it which is why I am surprised so many people are reacting in such an irrational way. I guess this guy didn't do his job properly.

      ps. I was the lead sound effects editor on the show. Along with blowing up Yellowstone and other sundry destructions, I personally cut about 80% of the computer screen beeps. And I cut every one of them just for you guys, because I know you love them so much :D

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    10. Re:Not stupid, just scared by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      Intelligent people don't get "the fear". You have to be stupid to buy into the fear in the first place.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    11. Re:Not stupid, just scared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, good luck to your fearless docile people. You will just kill yourself in accidents, not much different from the guys killed themselves in fear.

    12. Re:Not stupid, just scared by Alsee · · Score: 1

      There's so much fear in our culture, people are scared of health care, scared of a black president, scared of terrorists, scared of oil prices, scared of cell phone companies, scared of pirates (the Somalian kind), scared of pirates (the MPAA kind), scared of the RIAA and MPAA, scared of swine flu, scared of unemployment, scared of having a job that doesn't pay a living wage, scared of peanuts, scared of global warming, scared of pollution, scared of home invasions, scared of floods, earthquakes and fires, scared of nuts with guns, scared of the government taking away everyone's guns.

      Great.... now you have me scared of people who are scared.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  66. gene pool restoration project! by Simmeh · · Score: 1

    I would go LOL Americans but I'm sure we'll experience the same thing here (UK) as more people see it...

  67. Wow, indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this professor is making the whole thing up. No one came up to him who were genuinely contemplating suicide. My statement to him is: "Undoctored video of real people genuinely contemplating suicide, or it didn't happen."

    And the slahbot commenters are even more stupid than the strawmen they are laughing at.

  68. Give them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Darwin award.

    1. Re:Give them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make them promise to earn it, though.

  69. How stupid are people? by prefec2 · · Score: 1

    You go in a movie theater, watching a movie with fancy effects and a lot of sound and destruction which so ridiculous that is obvious that it is not a documentary or a feasable forecast. How could anyone really believe it? Do they have no education at all? Or are they just dumb from watching too much TV?

  70. Missed Oppurtunity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I honestly view this as an opportunity to rid the human race of some of the less quality stock.

    Look, if people honestly believe, that the world is going to end in December, or whatever, of 2012 because of a movie, or an ancient Calendar, or because of our position in space with regard to an observed 'Galactic Plane' or boundary that we might be crossing, and in turn they want to kill themselves, I fully support their position to end their life. As long as they don't want to take anyone else with them, let them remove themselves from the gene pool faster than you can say eugenics. People THIS stupid, gullible, or susceptible to social influence, are both a drain and danger to society.

    Sadly, if they have already reproduced, their genes have already been passed on. At most it gives us one less person who requires energy.

  71. Re:Not stupid, just scared - just stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at the definition for psychotic, travel from there to delusion. We recognize those as a mental problem.

    The problem is as a society we stand proudly on the thin edge of religion with an unprovable God. A strict application of the definitions of Delusion and Psychotic would line up a very large segment of the population for the psych ward.

    How do you tell the difference between the voice of God in your head and just "voices"?

    The fear and uncertainty and all that just feed into the blind acceptance of "god" like acts. Thus the god-fearing population runs scared from pronouncements like this.

    The above poster "If we remove the irrational fears" that would include any form of God.

    I know I am going to get flamed like crazy for this hence the anon.

  72. from a other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's really weird that NASA is responding to a 2012 movement....but from the other side maybe just maybe...there is something more to that then just a movie :)

  73. Wishful thinking by Experiment+626 · · Score: 1

    Maybe some people like the idea that the world will come to a fiery cataclysmic end in 2012 because it beats the alternative: a second term of the Obama administration.

  74. There's some good to this by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

    While 2012 may be fiction and guillable people are overreacting, it might be a good thing to raise awareness for the doomsday scenario of an earth - massive asteroid collision, which is a very real threat we have no escape plan for.

    We know it has happened at least once already. And I do get a bit nervous when I look at the lunar surface and at all the big craters it's splattered with.

    1. Re:There's some good to this by natehoy · · Score: 1

      You're right! We need to work on this immediately.

      I propose giving the moon an atmosphere so crap can burn up in it. That'll stop those stupid craters from forming...

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  75. there ought to be a law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    against being stupid enough to confuse a movie with reality. If a person is that dumb, they should not be allowed to watch movies or TV.

  76. Re:They have convinced me - the end really is near by mea37 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, two thigns.

    1) Just because you weren't around to see the stupid thigns humans have done in the past, doesn't mean that they're somehow less stupid than the stupid thigns we're doing today. A vocal but very small minority could topple civilization, but not by means of self-destructive ignorance and worry.

    2) The 2012 myth is not reaction to the movie; the movie is reaction to the 2012 myth. The 2012 myth takes many forms, and each of those forms have some elements that resonate wtih some people. The movie has magnified and publicized that resonance to a larger audience, although even so the vast majority do understand it to be fiction.

  77. April 3, 2030: 2000th anniversary of crucifixion by peter303 · · Score: 1

    The apocalypists will just choose another date for the end of the world then a few more years into the future. They've been doing this for centuries.

    Astronomers have determined there were two Thursday seders during Pilate's governorship. This date is the favored one. Then the millennialists can add an even 2000 years to that for the end of the world.

    This will oblivate a massive reprogramming effort to fix the UNIX clock which runs out of bits four years later.

  78. It's real... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 0, Troll

    I hate to tell you, but it's real, and very very real. Unfortunately, not quite as the movie depicts it, but I could see how when NASA plans to crash their satellite into the moon to see "what happens"...it may be a catalyst that could effectively break off part of the moon
    and then being that its orbiting the earth, that part could come crashing down on earth, as well now that the moon is not a full moon, the effects on the earths climate and atmosphere could change for the worst.

    Slashdot covered the story of NASA crashing their junk on the moon, supposedly to see what the impact would cause in terms of crater size...but I say, any time mankind has the idea to blow stuff up, nothing good comes of it....especially the item in question is responsible for our atmosphere, and our tides and currents in the sea, giving life (to sum up) to the whole planet.

    Call e crazy, but I do not see us out of the woods yet.....

    ps- Also, can anyone tell me why the international council has not stepped up and asked the Amercians (NASA) why they think they have the right to crash things into the moon...it isn't just theirs to do as they wish with!

    1. Re:It's real... by headhot · · Score: 1

      Are you out of your mind? Where the fuck do you think all those craters on the moon come from? Shit has been hitting the moon since it existed, and has it broken in half yet? You think a little satellite can do that?

    2. Re:It's real... by mikeee · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the stuff hitting the mooon in the past has been all-natural, and as we know, natural stuff is always safe, it's that nasty artifical stuff that'll kill you.

    3. Re:It's real... by Again · · Score: 1

      [...] Where the fuck do you think all those craters on the moon come from? [...]

      Wait! You're saying that the U.S. has been crashing stuff into the moon for years and they never told us!? The horror! They are probably TRYING to break it in half.

    4. Re:It's real... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      Well actually I have to thank you for pointing that out, although be it maybe with a little sarcasm, but the satellite was said to contain enough explosive power (onboard fuel etc..) to be equal to a ton of dynamite. I am not an engineer but when NASA plans to crash it into the moon, they mean to blast a big hole in it. Not smart if you ask me! Also, how does explosives work in space, is there a different physics to it then regular explosions on Earth???

    5. Re:It's real... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      Well actually the satellite was said to contain enough explosive power (onboard fuel etc..) to be equal to a ton of dynamite. I am not an engineer but when NASA plans to crash it into the moon, they mean to blast a big hole in it. Not smart if you ask me! Also, how does explosives work in space, is there a different physics to it then regular explosions on Earth???

  79. well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are the same kind of people who believe in Jesus and Santa Clause xD

  80. I can't wait for 2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So when the day it is supposed to come about, and absolutely nothing happens apart from being an frantic day full of people buying almost-last minute Christmas gifts. and then all of us who are intelligent enough to know that nothing catastrophic is going to happen, we can all sit back, crack open a cold one and roflmao at everyone for being stupid enough to believe in this conspiracy.

    I also can't wait to see what people will come up with next, now it is "2012, the day the Earth, Sun, and Galatic Center align!" next its going to be something stupid like 2102 "The day the earth, the sun, and the galatic center align with the center of the universe!!!!1!one!"

  81. Darwin Awards by aztektum · · Score: 1

    Modern medicine has kept those that would succumb to disease or illness alive. Now evolution relies on the stupid to make sure the strong survive.

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  82. It could happen... by BobMcD · · Score: 0

    Maybe/Probably not like in the movie. I haven't seen it, so I can't say.

    I do worry, slightly, that if the Yellowstone Caldera goes, I may well wish I had been dead first. And there exists the impossibly tiny possibility that an imminent explosion could be triggered by this whole 'moving through galactic center' business. Even the scientists on the page would admit they don't know what causes it to erupt. They don't even know what formed it, for that matter. But if/when it does go, most of North America will be ashen wilderness for the foreseeable future, planetary temperatures will plummet, etc. In that light it might be nice to have an idea as to when we're going to see that puppy go up.

    On the other hand, there isn't exactly a single thing you can do to prepare for this kind of an event. Nothing conceivable anyway, because there exists a greater possibility that nothing interesting will happen at all. Similar to how the world didn't end yesterday...

  83. Re:Not stupid, just scared - just stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice job trying to ignorantly categorize a culture not of your own. If anything, christians fear THEIR apocolypse, not an apocolypse allegedly defined by what they call a "heathen" religion.

  84. FAQ takes wrong approach by GradiusCVK · · Score: 1

    You know, I love NASA and the work they do, and I learned some interesting things reading that FAQ (particularly from the links to other active projects). Sadly, I think they take the wrong approach to deal with fucktards who think they should kill themselves and their loved ones to spare them from the apocalypse. Take this quote from the FAQ, for instance:

    Q: Is the Earth in danger of being hit by a meteor in 2012?
    A: The Earth has always been subject to impacts by comets and asteroids, although big hits are very rare. The last big impact was 65 million years ago, and that led to the extinction of the dinosaurs...

    Okay, time out. Yes, the answer goes on to explain that "you can see for yourself that nothing is predicted to hit in 2012". The problem here is, no, they won't go and see for themselves. In fact, they won't read to the end to even see that. They will see "Earth has always been subject to impacts", and "led to the extinction of the dinosaurs", and fucking freak out.

    Granted, my response would probably be something like "No, that's a stupid question, you're a fucking idiot, and you should kill yourself anyway", but if the goal is to save retards from themselves, perhaps NASA ought to write a FAQ for idiots and post it on www.thereisnoimpendingapocalypse.com.

  85. Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More stupid. Not "stupider".

    1. Re:Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the stupidest thing I've heard all day!

      (Some two syllable adjectives can use either form of the superlative. Stupid is one of them.)

  86. Re:Not stupid, just scared - just stupid by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    The above poster "If we remove the irrational fears" that would include any form of God.

    Religion is sold to people in much the same way as any state-driven fear; it just looks slightly different and so it gets categorized in a different box. But that box is in the same basement.

    This is why television is best avoided. It's not the adverts which get you; it's the implied reality behind the statements, and the endless flicker, flicker, flicker just on the edge of our awareness, lulling us into mass hypnosis. Most people I know who champion so-called "science" over religion are victims of that hypnosis. They wouldn't recognize real critical thinking if they tripped over it, but they truly believe they are critical thinkers. And THAT is how the dream of the matrix works to control people.

    -FL

  87. Mass hysteria by Stan92057 · · Score: 0

    NASA/Governments would never tell the truth anyways,i mean the mass hysteria that will happen if they did say the earth will be hit by a planet the same size as earth and will be 0 survivors

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  88. Darwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone that believes in 2012 please get out of the gene pool.

  89. For Crying Out Loud! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If people are seriously contemplating suicide because of a movie, just let them die. How could letting anyone that stupid off themselves be a bad thing?

    As for the kids, maybe they have a chance, but their breeding doesn't exactly inspire confidence. I guess we'll have to see how they turn out when 2036 hits theaters. (This time with 99942 Apophis in a starring role.)

    I say we run more apocalyptic fiction. How about covering oil shocks next time? I'm sure The Road will have a similar impact, too. Ooh, I know! Let's air 'The Day After' on all the major networks again.

  90. Re:They have convinced me - the end really is near by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Jesus Christ, dude, it was a joke. Of course there have been retarded people through all of civilization. I mean, we still have Christianity, right?

    --
    To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
  91. Too bad they contacted NASA.... instead of FASA by Fritz+T.+Coyote · · Score: 1

    The Freedonia Air and Space Administration covered this topic about 20 years ago... The cycle is not the end of the World, just a change from the 5th world to the 6th world... And a return of Magic and Elves and Dragons! So line up your fixers now, brother and sister deckers! ----

    1. Re:Too bad they contacted NASA.... instead of FASA by Dragoness+Eclectic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      *tries to figure out what the 3rd Imperium has to do with 2012, then realizes you are talking about Shadowrun*

      --
      ---dragoness
  92. the piper is looking for his dues by czarangelus · · Score: 0, Troll

    It seems obvious to me that these fears have nothing to do with the magical date of 2012. They are manifestations of peoples' subconscious realization that they live in a diabolical empire on its last legs on the world stage. America is losing its wars in the Middle East, having a mockery made of it by Israel's colonization of Palestinian land and destruction of their homes, and is collapsing economically like the Soviet Union. People may not consciously realize that their empire is at an end and their way of life finished, but their conscience revolts and such fears as these bubble up to the surface.

    You are well and truly finished, finished like the Mayans. You shit the bed and now you have to sleep in it. You have waged wars of conquest, you have allowed your politicians and bankers and military contractors to loot you with barely a whimper, you have ruined your environment, you have abandoned your fellow human beings and you have abandoned God. It should be no surprise that some people feel guilt more acutely, but misunderstand why they feel guilty and how they will reap what they have sown.

    --
    When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
    1. Re:the piper is looking for his dues by headhot · · Score: 1

      Who is inheriting it? The evil motherfuckers who blow up markets in their own neighborhoods killing women and children intentionally in the name of their god? I think not.

      Because as fucked as the US is, its still leaps and bounds better then the alternative.

    2. Re:the piper is looking for his dues by czarangelus · · Score: 0, Troll

      This is easy to refute.

      Number of suicide bombers in Iraq before US invasion: 0
      Number of suicide bombers in Iraq after US invasion: countless

      From where I'm sitting, it looks like your country paid terrorist organizations like Jundallah and set Muslims up to kill each other. Funny how there was so little violence in Pakistan 2 years ago, but today there are bombings across the country on a weekly basis. Could it be tied to the puppet regime in Pakistan which supports US strikes on its own people that have killed countless ethnic Pashtun civilians? No, of course not... it's because they're Muslums!

      You fucking fool how long ago was it that Europeans were killing one another by the tens of millions?

      --
      When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
    3. Re:the piper is looking for his dues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Post hoc ergo propter hoc, eh retard?

  93. Obligatory Simpsons quote by PuckstopperGA · · Score: 1

    Later, a full-force Bear Patrol is on watch. Homer watches proudly.

    Homer: Not a bear in sight. The Bear Patrol must be working like a charm.
    Lisa: That's spacious reasoning, Dad.
    Homer: Thank you, dear.
    Lisa: By your logic I could claim that this rock keeps tigers away.
    Homer: Oh, how does it work?
    Lisa: It doesn't work.
    Homer: Uh-huh.
    Lisa: It's just a stupid rock.
    Homer: Uh-huh.
    Lisa: But I don't see any tigers around, do you?

    [Homer thinks of this, then pulls out some money]

    Homer: Lisa, I want to buy your rock.

    1. Re:Obligatory Simpsons quote by cthubik · · Score: 1

      I believe the word is "specious". Next let's talk about the dumbing down of The Simpsons.

    2. Re:Obligatory Simpsons quote by PaganRitual · · Score: 2, Informative

      spacious reasoning; reasoning with large gaps where the logic just slips right through.

  94. Real reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NASA has to prove a point to Washington:

    Listen, without that budget being approved, we have to do things like, answer moviegoer science questions, and experiments like making mice float using magnetism will be par for the course. In fact, we could find Bin Laden with Pathfinder IV in his cave.

  95. Re:April 3, 2030: 2000th anniversary of crucifixio by natehoy · · Score: 1

    So you're saying that Microsoft is in charge of the release date of the Apocalypse, then? Makes perfect sense to me.

    Maybe they'll take out some of the nastier features. Then we only have to fear Apocalypse SP1.

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  96. Jeeze by headhot · · Score: 1

    Damn Palin supporters.

  97. Re:2012 by Dragoness+Eclectic · · Score: 1

    I saw the movie this weekend. It was better than I expected. Thanks to the trailer, I went in with very low expectations ("SciFi Channel Original with better special effects, right?"). It actually told a pretty good story, and the special effects eyecandy was AWESOME!

    I was chuckling when I guessed what the story was early on, though, and the rest of the movie confirmed it. They scrubbed off the serial numbers, changed the name, changed the exact cause of the disaster, changed a few details about the escape ships, but the plot is pretty much a re-telling of the classic scifi disaster novel, "When Worlds Collide". As the guy who compared "Dungeons and Dragons" with "Lord of the Rings" noted, it helps to start with a script that doesn't suck. "When Worlds Collide" doesn't suck; it's a classic story.

    The science, on the other hand, belonged to a SciFi Channel Original Movie, but hey, I expected that. The story was good.

    --
    ---dragoness
  98. Will you LISTEN to yourselves? by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 0

    Just because you happen not to have fallen for this particular piece of idiocy doesn't mean that half of you don't believe in the Swine Flu, or the Evil Terrorists, or the Free Market, or whatever your chosen flavor of gullible happens to be.

    Culled between so-called, "Science" (as opposed to the real thing), and religion, there remain precious few rational thinkers in the world.

    SO don't be so quick to judge. If everybody who believes in a stupid lie were to be struck dead right now, there would be tumbleweeds blowing through this forum. I remember when virtually everybody here once believed in WMD's with a salivating kind of vigor.

    In any case. . , the 2012 thing IS a myth, but just the date. Our world is right now on the cusp of a mass extinction and everybody knows it. The lie is in the fixed date. That's a distraction to confuse people with idiotic debate while the elites scurry to pack their tunnels with food and supplies.

    -FL

    1. Re:Will you LISTEN to yourselves? by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      It is stupid to believe that Earth will be ending in 2012 and it will not becoming less stupid just because other people think the swine flu is more dangerous than other flus. And same for the rest. It is more dangerous to die in a car accident than to be killed by a terrorist. And I will not text on the (not so) free market and its flaws, because you can find all information elsewhere.

      Please read: Manufactoring Consent from Noam Chomsky

  99. Multiple Iterations of History by Qzukk · · Score: 1

    you could probably get people to believe it in this day and age

    The same concept worked on TV.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  100. How do you answer these questions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't.... just let evolution run its course. NASA shouldn't be the lifeguard on duty at the gene pool.

  101. What if the bible predicted this? by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

    While there's plenty around here that put no faith in whatever calendar predicted 2012, but what if it was The Bible/Koran/Torah that predicted 2012? There's quite a bit more people that claim those books are the truth. I bet there's quite a few people on /. that are deeply religious and belief those books.

    While we might think a few folks are believing this movie's prediction; try convincing a devout Christian/Jew there was no 'burning bush' or Moses and his 10 Commandments.

    1. Re:What if the bible predicted this? by east+coast · · Score: 1

      2012 is not a Mayan religious end date at all. The hysterics that we are experiencing is a misinterpretations not by Mayans but by westerners who are twisting the religion to fit their own ideals.

      Moses and the burning bush are presented as historical fact in the bible. Not as prophecy. Regardless if you believe in the bible or in Moses, the Torah, the Koran is irrelevant. People who take actions in the name of the Christian god by means of interpreting prophecy are doing a great disservice to the religion and even the bible claims this with "No man shall know the hour..." I can't speak for Judaism or Islam in the same light so I honestly can not say.

      Now, I hope this puts some of these ideas to rest but I'm sure someone will use them again after reading this as a convenient way to bash religion. The bottom line is that no religion is predicting the end of the earth on 12/21/12. Anyone acting out in an attempt to avoid or catalyse these non-prophecies is doing a misjustice on their own and only have themselves to blame for not taking the who 10 minutes it takes to see that this is just crap thrown out there as a money maker by the same kinds of minds that brought you The Wizard of Oz and Star Trek.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:What if the bible predicted this? by natehoy · · Score: 1

      There is no calendar that predicted the end of the world in 2012. There's nothing to "believe", even if you are of the stripe that likes to believe in ghosts, spirits, boogeymen, faeries, magical trolls, or Gods.

      Oh, you mean the Mayan Calendar ending? Or, more accurately, the Mesoamerican calendar that the Mayans adopted reaching the same point at which the Mayans believed the 4th Earth was created (the one that finally worked) the last time around on the Long Count?

      So the Mayan calendar will change from 12.19.19.79 to 13.0.0.0. Then about 400 years later, it'll be 14.0.0.0. Those among you good in math will see a pattern developing. The Mayans would probably see this as a cause for mass celebration, much like us celebrating the new year in 2000 differently from, say, 1990. It's a big change in numbers. It's a whole new b'ak'tun, baby! And there are 16 of them.

      But the Mayans/Mesoamericans did not have a destruction myth surrounding 13.0.0.0. That was a recent addition by a few New Age cults, and is being marketed by Hollywierd to sell asses in seats.

      But, beware! We start a new Long Count cycle on Oct 12 4772! Then the implied leading zero will change to a one, and the year will be 1.0.0.0.0. Now THAT'S going to be an awesome party! Or, more likely, it'll just be 0.0.0.0 again. Then any computers programmed in the Mayan calendar won't know what piktun it is.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    3. Re:What if the bible predicted this? by bigdavex · · Score: 1

      Jehovah's Witnesses (wikipedia)
      Doctrinal criticisms
      The Watch Tower Society has made various predictions about the coming of Armageddon and Christ's millennial reign, raising expectations of their imminence in the years leading up to 1914, 1925, and 1975.

      --
      -Dave
    4. Re:What if the bible predicted this? by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      Thanks god there is no definite date for the end of the world in the bible. However, that has not stopped people from believing that the bible contains such information. But still I would not believe it just on the basis some person 1700 years ago haggled the book together. The same is valid for the Koran. And we all know were the Torah comes from. I would rather go for science here even when science is based on a logic which cannot be proven to be true.

    5. Re:What if the bible predicted this? by Lennie · · Score: 1

      That was on the lines of what I wanted to mention. I don't understand why people think the world should end if a calendar ends. I mean, noone expects the world to end at the end of the month, just because the month ends. If I understood correctly the Mayan thought a new cycle would start. As in: history repeating it self in some form.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    6. Re:What if the bible predicted this? by hierofalcon · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the quote is "Watch therefore, for ye know neither the day nor the hour wherein the Son of man cometh." (at least in the KJV translation). It says nothing about months or years although it might be an idiom that implied the same thing to that culture. Having said that, His point is to be prepared at all times because even if He doesn't choose to come back right now, the reader could still die right now which might be just as bad for a particular individual as if He returned for all His church.

      I would agree that picking and promoting a specific year generally does a disservice to Christianity and to the world in general. I do believe that most, if not all, prophecy relating to Christ's return for His church (whenever that happens to occur) is complete. After that there is at least one event which must occur that starts the rest of the clock ticking on the fulfillment of the rest of the Bible's prophecy.

    7. Re:What if the bible predicted this? by natehoy · · Score: 1

      But the point is that the Mayan calendar isn't even ending. The long view goes out past our year 4000...

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  102. Wrong year by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    7 pages of comments and Slashdot readers haven't mentioned " Science: "2012" a Miscalculation; Actual Calendar Ends 2220". Yeah, there will be panic.

    1. Re:Wrong year by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1
      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Wrong year by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      I thought the end is 2038.

  103. War of the Worlds by log0n · · Score: 1

    all over again!

  104. um, ok? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess you could reply to them that killing yourself and/or your family because you think the world is going to end (and kill everyone) because of a movie is pretty stupid.

    Those kinds of questions make me wonder, based on that kind of logic, why we dont just drop idiots like that off into a lava shute.

    Loh

  105. Future Darwin Award Winners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it was foretold: an entire class of people shall earn the Darwin Award in 2012.

    Let's be rid of these people...

  106. Now, now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The German Government has apologized for Roland Emmerich on several occasions!

  107. "Bullshit" blind believers by DrYak · · Score: 0, Troll

    Perhaps they'll issue a mass Darwin Award.

    Now imagine the irony if "Intelligent Design" supporters (as good examples of "take everything literally" ignorant) are among its winners !

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  108. Cinematic Neurosis by LatencyKills · · Score: 3, Informative

    This kind of thing is actually a documented mental illness (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1151359 among others). It began with The Exorcist leading to a bunch of people suddenly, literally, living in fear of their lives of being possessed by the devil. Later people watching Jaws, including some people living in Kansas far from any body of water that could reasonably contain a shark, became so afraid of shark attacks that they couldn't leave their homes. It doesn't happen often, but for those afflicted it can apparently be almost completely debilitating.

    --
    Jealously hoarding mod points since 2007.
    1. Re:Cinematic Neurosis by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think the Kansas fear was of people knocking on the door and mumbling "Candygram". Different kind of shark.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    2. Re:Cinematic Neurosis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but fearing sharks is reasonable in Kansas. I KNOW I saw land sharks on SNL.

    3. Re:Cinematic Neurosis by khallow · · Score: 1

      Besides they're in Monster Manual One and we know everybody has a copy of that. Take a halfling as bait, strap some explosives on them, and make rhythmic pounding like that of little feet. Not only does it gets rid of two pests with a bit of explosives, it's fun for the entire family.

      Protip: Rather than pay a hefty disposal fee, save those big scales for the dwarf forges. Nothing says "I have too much money!" in dwarvish like a sports car blinged up with a car body made of gold plated land shark scales.

    4. Re:Cinematic Neurosis by jandoedel · · Score: 1

      This illness has been documented here:
      here

  109. Amtrack of Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Actually I see it exactly like that. I just wanted to mention the global warming thing to see if anyone else sees the similarities.

      Maybe they could combine the two lists, to make the NASA pop culture FAQ:

    Will the world end in 2012?
      No, the majority of scientists believe climate change will destroy the world. We are waiting for the sequel to "An Inconvenient Truth" to provide an exact date, and it is not scheduled to be released until 2013.

         

  110. ***SPOILER ALERT*** by Stregano · · Score: 0

    That is normally something good to put before you start throwing in spoilers to the movie.

    --
    The world is how you make it
  111. Re:April 3, 2030: 2000th anniversary of crucifixio by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    Thursday? So actually the world will be destroyed by the Vogons ...
    Just checked: December 21, 2012 is a Friday. So it clearly won't be the day of doom.

    BTW, I've found the true interpretation of the Mayan calendar: 2012-12-21 will the release date of DNF.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  112. This is pretty simular. by pavon · · Score: 4, Informative

    The problem isn't people watching the movie 2012, it is the viral advertising surrounding it. They ran ads that made the movie sound a dramatization of a real idea rather than complete fiction, ala the Day After Tomorrow, and encourage them to search the web for the "real truth". The studio created a fake website purposing to be a scientific institute predicting a collision with earth in 2012. On top of this loonies have been talking about a 2012 apocalypse of some sort since we first understood the Mayan calendar, and latter some of them latched onto the Nimbiru idea after the books came out, so the internet is full of websites giving "evidence" of this catastrophe, many of whom claim to be scientific websites themselves.

    Yeah, people with a decent bullshit detector should be able to figure out that this is all crap, but it's not like they just watched a normal movie and thought it was read - the studio is trying to present it as though it were real, by making it a conspiracy that the mainstream is covering up.

    1. Re:This is pretty simular. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pffft, we real schitzos call it Planet X. And its not the end of the world, its the beginning of a new age.

      Its like you people have not even the basic understanding of how to predict the future by viewing the 'reflection' of numerological observations on planetary alignments.

  113. From the FAQ by Exception+Duck · · Score: 1

    ...Apparently ... use ... phrases about “alignments” and the “dark rift” and “photon belt” precisely because they are ... bad
    ahhhrg, this is horrible

    As far as the safety of the Earth is concerned ... the loss of biological diversity, and ... collision with an asteroid or comet...

    This is how he answers !?!

    Just because it's pseudoscientific doesn't mean it isn't scientific.

    There isn't a day when I don't think the end of the world.

  114. Clean Energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only there was a more efficent way to harvest abundant, clean-burning stupid.

  115. Ob. George Carlin by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that

          - George Carlin

  116. I like the hysteria! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The stupider people prove themselves to be the easier it will be to control them. Makes finding a job easier too.

  117. Potential astrophysical explanation for confusion by sneakyimp · · Score: 1

    A potential explanation for all this confusion can perhaps be found in the musings of Frank Zappa:

    "Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is
    so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute
    that. I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the
    basic building block of the universe."

  118. politics as usual... by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    The only reason the end of the world in 2012 is not being properly covered by news outlets is because of their well-known liberal bias. They know that 2012 will be an election year and that the GOP has a better end-of-the-world plan.

    --
    Nullius in verba
  119. Self-fulfilling Prophecy by TeethWhitener · · Score: 1

    I've always wondered about the possibility that doomsday predictions would be self-fulfilling. For instance, some insane person with an inexplicable amount of power (I'm looking at you, Kim Jong-Il) believes wholeheartedly in some end-of-the-world prophecy, and moreover, believes that they're going to have to be the one to set the events in motion. Then their predictions of terrible things happening on a certain date come true by virtue of the simple fact that they themselves were the initiator. In the case of this movie (and the 2012 prediction in general), I doubt we'd see anything dire, but who knows? We've seen tragedies like Heaven's gate and the Jonestown massacre already, and this one has all the force of a Hollywood endorsement behind it. I know plenty of posters here are ready to pounce all over this and write it off as mass hysteria or stupidity or whatever, but it kind of leaves me with a sick feeling in my stomach.

    1. Re:Self-fulfilling Prophecy by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      The world's greatest stockpile of nuclear weapons was guarded for EIGHT YEARS by someone who believed in The Rapture and that God was talking to him directly. A guy who believed in Gog and Nagog and that they were running around in the Middle East starting up the Apocalypse.

      No nukes were launched.

      Personally, I've always thought of Armageddon, the war to end all wars, as phrased improperly. I interpret it as "war, but with the goal of ending all wars". We don't have an English word for "jihad", meaning "an all-out effort", but that fits the meaning better; a jihad to end all wars.

      And yes, the world will end, burnt to a crisp with no life on it, barren and destroyed. The expected timeline for that is billions of years from now, when the sun has exhausted its fuel supply and engulfs us.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    2. Re:Self-fulfilling Prophecy by TeethWhitener · · Score: 1

      Citation needed. I'll assume you're referring to Putin (surely not Yeltsin or Gorbachev). But 'Russian policy toward the Middle East is often disjointed and has little in the way of military or economic strength to support it' citation here.

  120. Re:Not stupid, just scared - just stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >How do you tell the difference between the voice of God in your head and just "voices"?

    Because the Baby Jesus told me so himself!

    And the LORD spaketh upon me that all people going to Anonymous Coward mode must confer unto me MONEY that will be spent in HIS great mission! Can I get a hallelujah!

    Oh, wait, I went AC. I'm victim of an infinite loop. Send even more money before God divides by zero and we all end up in a black hole! Space goats! Superwhelks! Just SEND MONEEEEEYYYYyyyyyy....

  121. Easy Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I don't know how to answer those questions.

    "The 2012 End of the Earth? It's a government conspiracy designed to throw us in a panic and take away our freedoms and undermine our religious beliefs. The TRUE DATE is 2102 -- THE SAME NUMBERS REVERSED! No need to worry ... YET!"

    The dumbass people will be dead by then. Problem solved

  122. In the immortal words of Douglas Adams... by irussel · · Score: 1

    Don't Panic.

  123. One minute to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ;-(

  124. Why are you still talking? by DarthVain · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Kill yourself now, before its too late!"

    alternative ending:

    "Why bother, we are all gonna die in 2012!"

    alternate alternate ending:

    "Well its 2009, and the world ends in 2012, so if we take one number, 2009 and subtract it from 2012 you get the number 3. Its called math. So you should kill yourself in about 3 years. If you want to get really accurate, you could look at a calender and see what month it is, and what day, and really work out exactly when to do it! Either way, it isn't for awhile and your probably likely to die drowning looking up during a rain storm before that, so leave me alone..."

    alternate alternate alternate ending:

    "Don't worry about it we will be hit by a meteor or a comet long before then!"

    As an aside I have also heard that this Mayan 2012 prediction is all buffoonery. They Mayans thought their the world would end just like we think the world ends after December. It was their calender for keeping track of time. I think it was implied that you just restart the calender once the cycle is over. Perhaps it is so implisit that they didn't feel the need to explain this just the same we don't put a sticker on every calender we ever make that says "Not to worry, world not ending, new calender next year!"

    1. Re:Why are you still talking? by DavidHumus · · Score: 1

      The Mayans were right - their world did end.

    2. Re:Why are you still talking? by o2sd · · Score: 1

      As an aside I have also heard that this Mayan 2012 prediction is all buffoonery. They Mayans thought their the world would end just like we think the world ends after December. It was their calender for keeping track of time. I think it was implied that you just restart the calender once the cycle is over. Perhaps it is so implisit that they didn't feel the need to explain this just the same we don't put a sticker on every calender we ever make that says "Not to worry, world not ending, new calender next year!"

      Actually, the Mayans believed in a ~25,000 year cycle, divided into 5 epochs of ~5000 years. The current Mayan epoch ends in December 2012. Given that Mayan civilisation effectively collapsed in the 1600s, they were probably waiting until it got closer to the date to draw up a new calendar for the new epoch closer to the end of the current one.

      It should be said though, that the Mayans believed that the next epoch would be *very* different to the current one. The basis for this assertion is as yet undetermined, but to the previous poster who ridiculed Mayan civilisation, the Mayans were very capable astronomers and mathematicians. One only needs to look at the engineering of Mayan temples, aligned perfectly to either solar events or astronomical bodies to know that they were no amateurs.

      Have a look for 2012: Science or Superstition. It's about 90 minutes long, contains about 8 minutes of science, and 82 minutes of superstition, but the 8 minutes of science is very interesting, and much more worthwhile of debate than skygodders who panic after seeing a movie.

      --
      - Nothing to see hear.
    3. Re:Why are you still talking? by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      As an aside I have also heard that this Mayan 2012 prediction is all buffoonery. They Mayans thought their the world would end just like we think the world ends after December. It was their calender for keeping track of time. I think it was implied that you just restart the calender once the cycle is over.

      That's not quite true. What's ending is the long count ( IIR the name C ), which is about 11,000 years, and yes, while it is a rollover event like our Dec 31st; unlike our December 31st, the change of the time periods was though to correspond with change in the world and society, in a sort of astrological sort of way. Sort of the way the Earth and society changes between summer and winter. So we are leaving the era of the fourth sun and entering the era of the 5th sun. Some changes are supposed to take places, above and beyond a complete calender rotation.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    4. Re:Why are you still talking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like Cobol programmers, they didn't think anybody would be using their system that far into the future.

  125. I saw the movie...sadly by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    All I can say STUUUPID, both the movie and anyone taking it even remotely seriously. It was barely entertaining, more like a ready victim for MST3K than anything else. It just goes to show you how naive and gullible the average Joe and/or Jane is. The idea that you have to suspend belief for certain parts of movies is well established but you have to suspend all pretense of sentience and coherent thought to believe this one. I really hope Avatar is better than this...

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  126. Why prevent darwin from doing his job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand this quote:
    'I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide. I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves. I had one last week from a person who said, "I'm so scared, my only friend is my little dog. When should I put it to sleep so it won't suffer?" And I don't know how to answer those questions.'"

    What's wrong with letting Darwin deal with stupid peoples?

  127. What's more scary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know what is more scary, that people think a Hollywood movie is real or that these same people can also vote.

  128. Education Time! by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 5, Informative

    A friend of mine is taking an Arky (Archaeology for those less hip) Class, as she is an ancient & medieval history major, and she is taking a class this semester SPECIFICALLY on the Mayans. Her Prof is one of the archaelogists who work on sites like Tucan. The prof held an open public lecture in the University of Calgary in the first week of November here. My friend and I both attended, and while I never did believe in the whole Mayan Myth it's interesting to see where its origins begin.

    So this prof is basically a Mayan pro, she can translate most inscriptions just by looking at them (no reference needed) and she intimately understands their number and Calendar system. The first thing to know about Mayan numbers is that they don't use Base 10, they use base 20. The other thing to know is that there is not ONE Mayan Language. They were similar to all of Europe, where the europeans had french, English, spanish, german, etc, the Mayans had about 6 to 8 different Variants. And with that in mind, they were never a single nation, each city had it's own king/queen type leader, and they peacably would trade with the other cities of the area. No one city was truly the capital, but those major trade hubs and those with rarer goods tended to prosper more than the little towns.

    Anyways, so the Mayans used 2 different Calendars, and I can't remember how big, but there was a sizable gap in between the usage of each (I think like 800 years?). But basically what it breaks down into is the Short count and the Long count.

    The Short count is very much like our Calendar today, 18 months of 20 days each with 5 days at the end of the year for some religious purpose (Similar to the egyptians). They also had Names for days of their week, like Monday Tuesday Wednesday (Except Mayan Gods instead of Norse Gods). So if I were to say, Friday, December 25th, you'd know I mean this Christmas and not last Christmas or the next Christmas because they don't land on a Friday. This works well for 8 years until Christmas lands on a Friday again. You could be more precise about the date if you gave me the year, which is where the Long Count comes in.

    We attribute a year to 365 days. So I would say that Dec 31 2009 would be day 733285. The Mayans didn't use years, they merely counted days. Which is neat in some ways because there were 20 days in a month (And they're number system is base 20, remember?) But also a bit of a hassle in others, because there are 18 months.

    So the way Archaeologists expressed their long count is in a series of numbers seperated by decimals (It looks like a long IP Address to me). Day 1 would be like 0.0.0.0.0.1 and Day 23 would be like 0.0.0.2.3 - - Except here's the kicker - Mayans didn't set day 0 as anything in particular. In fact, their creation story takes place well after 0. This leads many people to believe that the Mayans set a date in the future as some signifigance and worked their way backwards. What day that could be or what they believed it would be has yet to be discovered. There are some speculations. No, its not 2012.

    Essentially the numbers further to the left represent longer periods of time, so each 1.0.0.0.0 in the long count is really like 8767 years give or take, which is a really long friggen time, right? We celebrate every year pretty much, but every odd once in a while we hold huge celebrations, like when we ushered in the new millenia in the year 2000. That sort of thing was also important to the Mayans. If I recall correctly, we're roughly around the 13.0.19.0.0 era on the Mayan Calendar. So when it rolls around to be 13.1.0.0.0 - wouldn't that be a rollover worth celebrating? To the Mayans it would be. Guess what day that happens to fall on? You're right, December 21 2012.

    So now that you've got a crash course on the Calendar and how it works, where exactly does the Prophecy come in? I'll tell you. Amongst the ruins of cities, Mayans had what we call Stelas. They are basically big stones which have stories and such carved into them, very much like a monu

    1. Re:Education Time! by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Informative

      AH!

      I forgot "The Great Alignment".

      There is no real planetary Alignment scheduled for Dec 21, 2012, which the Movie shows as the Moon, Earth, Jupiter, Saturn, etc, all being PERFECTLY in line. Yeah no, not going to happen.

      As for the whole, Earth, and one of the constellations making a perfect line with the "Dark Rift" - Yes, that IS scheduled to happen! But guess how rare it is? It happened in 2008, and 2004, and 2000... and you get the idea. Its not very rare at all.

  129. We need stupid people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need stupid people to work in fast food, park cars, join the enlisted military (although some need the structure to gain maturity and/or get out of terrible circumstances), and to become mediocre high school teachers.

  130. Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow... i wish I had mod points.

    You get points from me just for having the balls to say it on this bastion of socialism called Slashdot!

  131. How many people are actually worried? by Dirtside · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been noticing a lot of these "NASA Calms 2012 Fears" articles in the last few days, enough that it makes it sound like there's more of a story here than I think there really is. The real question is, how many people are actually worried about this? I'm guessing that it's a tiny number, and probably what happened is, a statistical blip caused a few of the crazier ones to contact NASA. So then he posts on the blog about it, and for some reason a lot of places pick up the story.

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  132. A (Major) Nitpick by mosb1000 · · Score: 0

    The central claim of Christianity is that a follower of Christ (a christian) will know God in this world, and live with Him through eternity in the next. A christian would not, therefore, believe that they are going to be cast into a lake of burning sulfur and be eternally tormented by the devil. We believe that will happen to you (assuming you are not a follower of Christ).

    As with regard to whether or not the "literal" versions of God, the devil, and souls exist, I am curious how you make the distinction between the "literal" meanings of these words and other (figurative?) meanings. When I speak of spirituality and religion I am describing how unseen (or supernatural) realms can and do affect human beings. In that context I can not easily differentiate between "literal" and "figurative" meanings as nothing I attempt to describe manifests itself in the "physical" world as it is commonly known. I emphasize that spiritual entities are literally real, because I don't want people to get the idea that I am talking about these things in a hypothetical or theoretical way.

    If you feel better thinking of these concepts as hypothetical or figurative, I would suggest that you do so. Do so often and with zeal. The more you consider such matters, the more you may come to know the Truth. Ultimately, there is nothing else worth knowing, and that is the central claim of Christianity.

  133. 2012 maybe the year of the cubs to win it all! and by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    2012 maybe the year of the cubs to win it all and that will be a VERY BIG THING.

    anyways this looks the year for the blackhawks. The bears maybe next year.

  134. Like, oh I don't know. Mythbusters? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That show has some REALLY bad science in it at times. For instance, one episode discussed the "myth" (rather old wives saying) that with breakfast cereal (the american kind) the cardboard box it comes in contains more NUTRITION then the cereal itself.

    The amazing mythbusters then went on to determine the CALORIE/ENERGY and FAT contents of both products. Do Americans REALLY need more CALORIES or FAT in their diets? Not once did they test EITHER of the products for NUTRITIONAL values, as in minerals/vitamins etc. They proved that sugar coated grain gives you energy. No shit sherlock. Your MOTHER is talking about nutrition as you find it in fresh vegetables, and fruit. Not a sugar cube or lump of butter.

    And yet many here at slashdot consider mythbusters as valid science and often quote their results to prove how silly a myth is.

    I seen another show where helicopters were discussed and the claim was made that helicopters do not have ejection seats. Correct. US helicopters do not, SOVIET helicopters did. How many believe a lie because they thought a documentary was a documentary?

    The truth, the real absolute, total and complete truth is not good entertainment and does not fit in a soundbite or between commercial blocks.

    And the truth is hard to understand because you need to understand an lot of complex subjects that you actually need to spend some time thinking about.

    What IS the mayan calendar and why is 2012 significant and as mentioned in the article is that different then 31st december 2009? If you don't understand WHAT a date really is, how time is tracked, then you COULD think 31st december 9999 would be an ending (which is rougly what 2012 is to the mayans). Silly if you TRULY understand calendars, numbers and such but many don't.

    For many people, magical thinking fills in the gaps between their understanding of the world and a LOT of us do it. Come one, be honest how much of your understanding of gravity is a rubber sheet with a weight on it? There is no rubber sheet, that is magical thinking to help your limited intelligence deal with the concepts thought up by truly brilliant people.

    So, don't be to condescending, you are no Einstein.

    Our world is filled with half lies to explain things away because explaining everything to everyone would explode the education system and not help getting the bloody toilets cleaned and garbage collected and even peoples wounds dressed.

    A simple story: In africa there used to be a believe that if you used a cooking stick twice, evil demons would posses it. White missionaries said this was silly superstition and forbid this practice. people soon dropped dead. Why? The evil spirit called food poisoning. This is LESS of an issue in colder climates like europe, but in the hot african sun food spoils far more rapidly.Oh, the story might not be true, but the gist of it is that sometimes "magical thinking" fills a gap between knowing that something is true and knowing the reason behind it.

    But we humans ain't perfect and we all can't spent all our time reading books. These people heard something, didn't understand it and nobody is willing to clearly explain it and then there are stations like Fox that even add to the fear mongering for their own gains. Hell even Discovery and National Geographic are happy to host a "lets scare people" show to get ratings. How are people to know the full truth when the lies are sold so much better?

    I think what NASA is doing is the right thing, but they should do it more clearly and get someone like Carl Sagan, someone who can talk plain english to explain it on tv on popular chat shows. SHOW people. Don't hide in the ivory tower sneering down, come out with the science. People LOVE science, but you need to open up to them, not by talking down to them, but by starting easy and then pulling them up. Why do you Einstein is such a celebrity? Because HE could do that. Few can. Certainly not most people here.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Like, oh I don't know. Mythbusters? by Thing+1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think what NASA is doing is the right thing, but they should do it more clearly and get someone like Carl Sagan [...]

      Yeah, that's just what the superstitious need: Zombie Carl to explain the not-coming apocalypse!

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    2. Re:Like, oh I don't know. Mythbusters? by horza · · Score: 1

      Mythbusters is great science as entertainment. People can quote Mythbusters to bust myths because they do a lot of practical easy-to-understand experiments that clearly prove the myth to be false. If you are unhappy and can give a valid reason as to why you think they got it wrong, then they will redo the experiment with the new parameters. There have been plenty of revisited episodes, some of which have changed the myth status. I disagree with your nutrition example though.

      "In africa there used to be a believe that if you used a cooking stick twice, evil demons would posses it. White missionaries said this was silly superstition and forbid this practice. people soon dropped dead. Why? The evil spirit called food poisoning."

      Many advancements are through trial and error, or just blind luck. The why then follows a while later. It is easy to see why they thought it was demons, as being food poisoned feels like you are being punished. I've experienced a few of the demons that hang around my local kebab house. I don't know the details of your particular story, but maybe those deaths let to the importation of the knowledge of sterilisation and the Africans actually ended up better off?

      I disagree with your general premise that most people are stupid and educating themselves will just hurt their tiny minds. That they need a medicated dose of "Carl Sagan's science fairy tales" each evening. Many lack the will/opportunity to better educated themselves, but the more information and resources you put in front of them the more will pick up the torch and keep pushing society forward. Take that guy that flunked his entrance exams and went to work as a patent clerk, Einstein, for example. There are a few inspirational people, Patrick Moore for astronomy springs to mind, but in general if people want to learn they will just do it. If they don't, they shouldn't impede the people that do.

      Phillip.

    3. Re:Like, oh I don't know. Mythbusters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think what NASA is doing is the right thing, but they should do it more clearly and get someone like Carl Sagan [...]

      Yeah, that's just what the superstitious need: Zombie Carl to explain the not-coming apocalypse!

      Must.....eat.....BILLIONS & BILLIONS of.....BRAINS!

  135. What Nibiru? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh guys, Nibiru isn't even in the movie. Neither is the orbital space colonies or the underground cities in Antarctica. I went and saw 2012 the other day at the cinema. frankly I was let down by the lack of crazy stuff the website had that was actually in the movie. The entire plot is galactic allignment heats the earth causing devastation. There is NO ROGUE PLANET. Idiots wishing to kill themselves over Nibiru need to wake the hell up.

  136. Y2K Loop by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    The Mayan/Aztec/Inca/etc "2012" date is just their calendar's version of "Y2K". Their symbols for time are repeated circles, so they have to repeat somewhere. Nobody takes any other ancient Western Hemisphere religious prophecy seriously at all, even those that actually prophecy something other than the inevitable form the symbols will take on some day.

    People are so afraid of a world they don't understand, that they refuse to understand, that plenty of us can be scared into overreacting to anything, no matter how paranoid and unreal.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  137. The black sport is cover for stargate pro......... by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    The black sport is cover for stargate pro.........to.......amke.ship./.........notvafssafdkjldsafjdslaadsljfsjdaklajdsajfdskl,

  138. Let them Kill themselves by realsilly · · Score: 1

    If they truly believe in this predictions, then I say, let them kill themselves. People can choose to believe these predictions, or they can choose not to. If they choose to and want to end their lives to avoid it, then let them. There is no need to babysit these individuals who refuse to look at all the facts and not read into propaganda.

    --
    Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
  139. Re:How History Repeats .... by frogzilla · · Score: 1

    From the site "Letters of Note" which seems to be down at the moment:

    Aberdeen, S. Dak.
    November 1, 1938

    Federal Communications Commission
    Washington, D. C.

    Gentlemen:

    I have read considerable concerning the program of Orson Welles presented over the Columbia Broadcasting System Sunday evening. I suppose that by this time you have received many letters from numerous cranks and crack-pots who quickly became jitterbugs during the program. I was one of the thousands who heard this program and did not jump out of the window, did not attempt suicide, did not break my arm while beating a hasty retreat from my apartment, did not anticipate a horrible death, did not hear the Martians "rapping on my chamber door," did not see the monsters landing in war-like regalia in the park across the street, but sat serenely entertained no end by the fine portrayal of a fine play.

    The "Mercury Theatre" has been one of the radio high-lights of the week for me this fall. The program Sunday, I felt, was one of their better programs.

    Should your commission contemplate serious measures toward the Columbia Broadcasting System my suggestion would be that the "Mercury Theatre" be directed to re-broadcast this program and the reaction of all the listening audience be solicited.

    In the interest of a continuation of the fine things in radio today, I am,

    Very respectfully yours,

    (Signed)

    J. V. Yaukey

  140. Darwin evolution at its best.... by pjr.cc · · Score: 1

    "I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide" - seriously, if you believe 2012 (or any movie really) enough to even say something like that, the world is probably better off without you. Thats really just plain stupidity. "A movie said the world might end in a little over 2 years, i better kill myself now" honest to god, your just wasting valuable air useful people could be breathing. But to read this, "I've had two from women contemplating killing their children" is really sad and somewhat supprising that people this dumb actually figured out how to breed (perhaps im assuming too much?).

    Is the world really getting as stupid as it appears to be?

  141. Stupid ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stupid ?

    Does this remind of some other induced hysteria that is leading millions of people to get inoculated with a barely tested vaccine?

    Nothing to see here, move along.

  142. I offer 2012 insurance by sp3d2orbit · · Score: 2, Funny

    OK, if you really believe 2012 is the end, I have a wonderful deal for you:

    I will give you 50% of the cash value for all your belongings AND you can keep them through 2012. IF the world doesn't end, I get to have your things in 2013.

    Any takers?

  143. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  144. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  145. It's not so simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In this case it is exactly the same.

    These reports did not come from some long overlooked rainforest tribe, but rather from people intelligent enough to call NASA with worries and fears. These are people able to read or at least watch TV news, or surf the net.

    Yet they can't distinguish between a movie trailer and real life.

    You're making a gross over-simplification of what's going on here. I've come to learn that people aren't THAT stupid, nor THAT smart in all matters in life. The crucial difference is the ability and knowledge base required to sort out BS from reality.

    To be more specific: People aren't just watching a movie and deciding to kill themselves. They are hearing A LOT about this 2012 date in ALL media. Then the worried can and do "research" on the net and that's where they find shit-loads of "supporting evidence" and believers. There's also that ridiculous built-in presevation mechanism most of us have and have to fight: "what if?" and "better safe than sorry" logic. Some people can get very anxious over what they don't know or don't understand, so they'll go for the "faith" option that puts them in the "I'm protected" category. It's not that surprising really, given what we know about human psychology and some of the irrational things even smart people do.

    The media doesn't help either. It's way more ratings-catching to promote the doomsday theories than it is to promote "it's just a calendar" reality.

    1. Re:It's not so simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      built-in presevation mechanism != suicide.

      Just sayin....

  146. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  147. NOW!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTFA: 'I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide. I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves. I had one last week from a person who said, "I'm so scared, my only friend is my little dog. When should I put it to sleep so it won't suffer?" And I don't know how to answer those questions.'

    This is so easy to answer. The answer is now! Go ahead and off yourself and your little dog. You're just helping the rest of us by reducing the amount of 'stupid' in the world.

  148. Got Astrophysics? by starglider29a · · Score: 1
    Much of the Book of the Revelation has things falling out of the sky onto the Earth.
    • and there came hail and fire mixed with blood, and it was hurled down upon the earth. A third of the earth was burned up, a third of the trees were burned up, and all the green grass was burned up.
    • and something like a huge mountain, all ablaze, was thrown into the sea.
    • and a great star, blazing like a torch, fell from the sky...the name of the star is Wormwood.
    • and I saw a star that had fallen from the sky to the earth. The star was given the key to the shaft of the Abyss
    • (AND EARTHQUAKES) No earthquake like it has ever occurred since man has been on earth, so tremendous was the quake... Every island fled away and the mountains could not be found.
    • mighty angel picked up a boulder the size of a large millstone and threw it into the sea, and said: "With such violence the great city of Babylon will be thrown down, never to be found again.

    I haven't seen the movie yet, but I will. I've been working for many years on a novel which uses a rogue planet (a la Leiber's Pail of Air) to bring about all of the signs of the Apocalypse. The scariest part is that it could. You don't need faith to understand Revelation, you need a degree in Astrophysics.

  149. The person in the article worried about the dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Keep it - just in case. It could end up being a great meal when the apocalypse hits...

  150. this coincides with End Times by swschrad · · Score: 1

    in the Christian church calendar. hey folks, not to prosletyze here or anything, but when the universe comes apart, I'm going to be otherwise engaged, thanks.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  151. Any reasonable person knows 2012 hype by jweller13 · · Score: 1

    2012 debunked: http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4093 Any reasonably intellegent person knows that 2012 is just another date with no particular significance. It may be a very entertaining movie but the date is just, well... another date.

  152. These folks contemplating suicide. by motherjoe · · Score: 1

    These folks contemplating suicide. Wonder if this is the same group that believes Obama's birth certificate is a fake or that Glenn Beck is the second coming?

    Wait, if we do have a sudden spike it suicides, that's going to put a dent in Glenn's demographics for sure.

    Take care and use plastic ware....

    --
    "Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy - Benjamin Franklin"
  153. Of course, there actually IS a planet Nibiru . . . by SEE · · Score: 2, Informative

    . . . because Nibiru is the name of Jupiter in the Babylonian compendium of astrology, Mul.Apin.

    Jupiter isn't going anywhere, of course.

  154. Re:How History Repeats .... by neonsignal · · Score: 1

    There's no excuse at all for 2012.

    maybe they forgot to stay and read the credits...

  155. Of course... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    That's what they would say even if there were a planet ...what the hell was it called... ...Nibiru... about to collide with Earth.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  156. The New Dark Ages... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know plenty of people laugh at the superstitions of people in the Dark Ages, but science as we know it, didn't exist then. I mean Aristotle had some great ideas, but there was little or nothing to take the place of raw superstition until about the 13th or 14th century (at least in the West).

    But what is peoples' excuse today? How is it that people who presumably graduated from the American educational system are no better off than some dirt-farming peasant from barbarian times? Things weren't always this bad. If I had the choice of hiring someone with a high school education from 1909 or someone with a high school education from 2009, I'd choose the 1909 person, and 90% of the time I'd be better off.

    But of course or education system is fine, it just needs more money thrown at it.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    1. Re:The New Dark Ages... by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      I think these people *are* a lot better off than some dirt-farming peasant from barbarian times. Which goes to show you how absolutely horrible barbarian times must have been. Everything is magic, etc.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    2. Re:The New Dark Ages... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      The standard of living can't be compared, but there are clearly people today whose grasp of reality is tenuous at best.

      Of course it doesn't help that tons of movies deliberately obscure the difference between fantasy and reality. Dan Brown for instance claims his works are entirely fictitious, but you know, and he has to know, that lots of people think they are based on historical fact. Oliver Stone makes movies about real events that vary anywhere from an appoximate and fictionalized account of historical events to downright fantasy. And the less said about Al Gore, the better.

      The gullibility of our poorly-educated but heavily indoctrinated populace is bad enough, but the fact that plenty of people in power, whether in the "entertainment" business, the "news" business or politicians are more than willing to exploit, and worsen this confusion makes things all the worse.

      Orwell expressed a lot of these ideas, but he was a piker compared to some of these folks.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  157. That takes capital... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    ...and I haven't got any, snif.

    On the bright side, this doesn't seem to be happening over here in my country.

    --
    No sig today...
  158. not new by celle · · Score: 1

    I just got done reading "After Worlds Collide" and before that "When Worlds Collide" both written in the early 1930's. Wake up people, it's just fiction. We really have a lot more to worry about than a movie that's a remake of a movie from the 1950's that was based on a book from the 1930's. Judging from current reactions, over 80 years, I actually think we've gone backwards some.

  159. not close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it's not really close, because Rev 8:10-11 has nothing to do with stars, river pollution and the end of the world. Those verses actually refer to the conflict in heaven before the world was created, where a fallen "star" - in other words, a fallen angel, who is Lucifer - influenced 1/3 of the spirits in heaven to follow him and reject God. When they did so, they had to depart from God's presence because of their rebellion and bitterness, which separation is called spiritual "death". Now that you know this info, re-read it again, and it should make sense now.

    Most people, including many Christians, fail to realize the entire Bible is a collection of letters and stories using metaphors to explain religious principles - not to be taken literally, well except for a few things, like the straight forward language of the 10 commandments... Another metaphor: The 6 "days" of the creation are actually representative of 6 "creative periods" the duration of which has not been revealed, but is suspected to be between 1-2 billion earth years each.

    1. Re:not close by WillDraven · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The 6 "days" of the creation are actually representative of 6 "creative periods" the duration of which has not been revealed, but is suspected to be between 1-2 billion earth years each.

      That still doesn't make any sense, the bible has earth, daylight and plants made before the sun and stars.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    2. Re:not close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another metaphor: The 6 "days" of the creation are actually representative of 6 "creative periods" the duration of which has not been revealed, but is suspected to be between 1-2 billion earth years each.

      This is a common interpretation amongst people who have faith in the bible but don't take Genesis literally.

      The undeniable fact of the matter, though, is that the Hebrew authors used the word for "day," and there is no reason to think they meant anything but a normal 24-hour Earth day. Wrong or right, metaphor or not, the word "yom" means "day" and not "period."

    3. Re:not close by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

      "In the beginning God created the Heavens and the earth and the earth was without form and void (no electrical charge yet?) and darkness (low\zero energy) was upon the face of the deep (singularity) and the spirit of God moved across the face of the water (volitile superfluid) and said "Let there be light" and there was light (Photon emmision begins) and God saw the light, and it was good. (Effect follows cause, time exists)"

      The Heavens and the earth are not, as translations go, the place where dead people go nor the planet we are on. The earth in this reference is more then likely "solid stuff" matter with the heavens the space in which the solid stuff occupies. There choice in words through translations doesn't seem to imply that earth is Earth\Terra but more akin to Dirt, Ground, that which is beneath your feet.

      "And God separated the light and darkness into day and night"

      This effectively constructs the flow, the passage, of time at the most base of interpretation. You physicists could even say this is the point where matter-antimatter throw down or when at the point of singularity the 4 primary forces decouple giving us matter and energy. The "Let there be light" could easily have been the initial singularity coming into existence (assuming there was a beginning to the universe.)

      "the firmament and the waters"
      From a geological standpoint the earliest ingredient for life as we know is water. Early in a planet's formation you would get liquids being deposited on surface. So far keeping in line with the order we expect. Density is now in play. solid planets and gas giants along with stars at this point.

      Greeks knew of the primary 4 states of matter 2000+ years ago:
      "Fire (Plasma) Earth (Solid) Air (Gas) Water (Liquid)" Give the old folks some credit. Any damn fool rolling a rock down a hill can understand the passage of time and to speculate the concept of the arrow of time is simple for a baker watching bread rise.

      Even the order life is created in tends to reflect our current assumptions on evolutionary paths. We go with ocean based life to mammals and end with humans. Darwin was hardly the first to suggest evolution. Even ancient Greeks made observations similar. Darwin mearly crossed the Ts and dotted the Is in the idea.

      Lastly for those looking at the story of creation remember the translations say "The First Day, The Second Day, etc." They so far never imply "The Next Day" It's an inpspirational work, not a handbook for science.

      Lastly, I am forever amused at the arrogance of modern society that somehow writes off the first 10,000 years of human history as a bunch of morons. They had a lot of sound ideas that took 2000+ years to come around. Nothing to say their superstitions don't have a sound origin in theory.

      There were plently of people ahead of their time, don't discredit "supersition" as nonsense, some of it has turned out to be sound in principle even if lacking realistic footing.

      Metaphors my friends. When talking to children, you use a language they can understand.

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  160. Re:How Hysteria Repeats .... by Scott+Kevill · · Score: 1

    I almost thought your typo was intentional. :)

    --
    GameRanger - multiplayer gaming service for PC and Mac games
  161. "idiocracy" by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

    Even here this tag is unwarranted. In fact, these events have the opposite effect to those described in idiocracy.

    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  162. I've got an idea... by Samarian+Hillbilly · · Score: 1

    Let's announce that a spaceship has been built to save the really important people, and anyone who signs on now gets the trip for free...

  163. I have an answer for you by marqs · · Score: 1

    I had one last week from a person who said, "I'm so scared, my only friend is my little dog. When should I put it to sleep so it won't suffer?" And I don't know how to answer those questions.'" Tell them to go ahead as planned. A few less nutcases to worry about for the rest of us ;)

  164. Re:Not stupid, just scared - just stupid by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

    Religion is sold to people in much the same way as any state-driven fear; it just looks slightly different and so it gets categorized in a different box. But that box is in the same basement.

    This is why television is best avoided. It's not the adverts which get you; it's the implied reality behind the statements, and the endless flicker, flicker, flicker just on the edge of our awareness, lulling us into mass hypnosis. Most people I know who champion so-called "science" over religion are victims of that hypnosis. They wouldn't recognize real critical thinking if they tripped over it, but they truly believe they are critical thinkers. And THAT is how the dream of the matrix works to control people.

    Ok, let's see what you're saying here:
    - Religion is sold through fear. Similarly, fear is used to "sell" other things.
    - Because of the above, television should be avoided.
    - People who champion so-called "science" over religion have been hypnotized by the television(into a state of fear?)

    What kind of "science" are you referring to? Is your argument that people who think themselves critical thinkers are gobbling up the same kind of fear as the religious, and simple reverting to a different kind of religion you term "science"?

    Please elaborate so we can do a better job tearing your argument to pieces.

    --

    People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  165. Re:Not stupid, just scared - just stupid by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    Please elaborate so we can do a better job tearing your argument to pieces.

    Are you suggesting that everybody who claims to be an unbiased critical thinker is actually an unbiased critical thinker?

    Here's a fairly basic question for you:

    Would an unbiased critical thinker who already KNOWS he doesn't have enough information, automatically ASSUME that this unknown quantity (the information you are requesting), will allow the performance of the rather emotionally-driven action of, "tearing [an] argument to pieces"?

    What kind of "science" are you referring to?

    Had your Swine Flu shot yet?

    Is your argument that people who think themselves critical thinkers are gobbling up the same kind of fear as the religious, and simple reverting to a different kind of religion you term "science"?

    More or less, Yes. Do you allow the fear of ridicule from the authority figures you respect to dictate what you think about and explore?

    -FL

  166. Alternative? by catman · · Score: 1
    Because as fucked as the US is, its still leaps and bounds better then the alternative.

    Look, dude, there are other countries on Earth than the US and Afghanistan, even if they aren't mentioned on Fox News.

  167. I predict that... by packman · · Score: 1

    I predict that the average IQ will go up somewhere in 2012...

  168. If the world is ending, sell me your house... by hrpatton · · Score: 1

    ... at 75% of its market value.

    That's the offer I made people during the Millennium panic back in 1999. I reasoned that if the world were really on the brink of chaos, the wisest policy would be to move somewhere more sustainable than a residential subdivision. When the utilities collapsed, you'd need renewable sources of electricity, clean water, etc., as well as the ability to defend your home and family against looters and thieves. Better to spend all your money before the banks and government collapse and currency loses all value.

    Every time I hear about some cult predicting the end of the world, I want to make the same offer. "Hey, you think the world is going to end next year. Shouldn't you spend all your resources bringing sinners to God? What's the matter; don't you have faith?" I couldn't go through with it if anyone said yes, but the temptation is there.

    The best way to stave off panic is to throw cold, hard money at it.

    See you next Apocalypse.

  169. At least they will clean themselves out. by stickystyle · · Score: 1

    With any luck these people will off themselves prior to 2012 because they are flat out nuts. The ones that totally buying into hysteria but not nuts enough to kill themselves for fear of an event will hopefully fall into a deep depression and kill themselves when they realize they are dip-shits when the Gregorian new year rolls around.

    --
    Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate
  170. Re:Not stupid, just scared - just stupid by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

    Here's a fairly basic question for you:

    Would an unbiased critical thinker who already KNOWS he doesn't have enough information, automatically ASSUME that this unknown quantity (the information you are requesting), will allow the performance of the rather emotionally-driven action of, "tearing [an] argument to pieces"?

    Was a tongue in cheek comment, I appreciate it may come across differently however.

    What kind of "science" are you referring to?

    Had your Swine Flu shot yet?

    Ehmm, no? Over here they're mostly vaccinating kids atm. Things being as they are right now I feel the Swine Flu does not pose enough of a risk factor for me to decide to go and get the shot.

    Is your argument that people who think themselves critical thinkers are gobbling up the same kind of fear as the religious, and simple reverting to a different kind of religion you term "science"?

    More or less, Yes. Do you allow the fear of ridicule from the authority figures you respect to dictate what you think about and explore?

    No, not really. Which authority figures would these be?

    --

    People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  171. 2012: The Gnu Collective Consciousness (GCC) by sakari · · Score: 1

    What if .. GNU became conscious:

    http://lgo900.wordpress.com/2009/05/09/2012-the-gnu-collective-consciousness/

    This is my take on the 2012 hysteria looked through the glasses of a geek (I don't actually wear glasses, though). Shameless plug, but so is this article too for the movie.
    A scenario like this could happen. But seriously, I think 2012 is just a marker in our fate that starts a new era of thinking and conscious working towards unity between humans. This is what I'm working towards, and I know a lot of other people are doing the same thing.

    Creating fear in the masses has long been the way of Hollywood and those pulling the strings between the scenes. Don't believe the hype, think for yourselves. Don't let negative opinions of others affect you, don't believe the movie industry who just want your money.

    We, and you, create the future. Let's make it a bright one, ruled by compassion and love, not fear and self loathing. Thank you.

  172. Concur, especially after 9/11 by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    While watching a recent documentary on the World Trade Center, I finally saw the collapse of WTC 7.

    With that footage and the other images of the Towers collapsing, I want to yell at Hollywood, once and for all:

    "SKYSCRAPERS ARE NOT DOMINOS!!!"

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  173. Re:Not stupid, just scared - just stupid by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    Ha ha!

    You locked that all down pretty quick when you figured out some of the rules of this particular engagement. Evidence of Ego = losing. Game theory. The problem is that I set the rules, which means you've already submitted to me by altering your behavior so that it fits with the acceptable "Win" pattern. --Which, of course, means I've already got the home advantage. More game theory.

    And yes, this is ugly.

    These scurrying bit of counter-productive idiocy, (which we ALL have inside us), don't go away. They hide and play games in the back-ends of our minds. I don't like it, and I'm betting you don't either. But where are we? What can be done? --The only effective countermeasure to automatic, predatory thinking is to stay vigilant and learn about the nature of the predator. When we accumulate enough knowledge and energy, we can begin to work towards true ownership of our minds. And then we can choose whether to be monsters or not.

    The fact of the matter is this: --Pretty much everything you or I or anybody does is a pre-programmed response designed to increase effective feeding and power accumulation. It's a master stroke! It's self-imprisoning behavior. When the slaves are already trying to prevent the other slaves from growing strong, this becomes the primary mechanism in maintaining the state of universal bondage. The trick is recognizing our own internal predator. Most people have no idea. They hide behind the belief that they are giving, happy, smart people when really their primary actions, when examined, are not chosen from the top ends of our minds but rather are self-serving reactions to ego-based directives. Everybody is engaged in some form of game theory in virtually every interaction they have with the world. But this is an uncomfortable thing to consider, and so they pretend. Or they simply do not see. And so they are blind slaves.

    Now science is a wonderful thing because, when practiced correctly, it bypasses many of the tools of the predator. But the predator is very clever; it is responsible for the knee-jerk, ego-wounded reactions we have to certain statements, (Such as, "Most people I know who champion so-called "science" over religion are victims of that hypnosis. They wouldn't recognize real critical thinking if they tripped over it, but they truly believe they are critical thinkers. And THAT is how the dream of the matrix works to control people."), which in turn blossom into entire behavior sets which we believe are based on our personal choices, but which are instead based on these auto-reactions.

    Faux science uses the authority of real science to manipulate people by creating convincing lies; it can create society-wide fear. In the case of this Swine Flu thing, it creates fear of plague. And then it can then be used to make us feel safe and secure when we alter our behavior in the manner in which it tells us = "Win". (In the Swine Flu example, winning = getting a shot.) By contrast, real science asks, "What are ALL the factors involved and who ultimately benefits from the resulting patterns?"

    It's all game theory, and a frightened populace is not able to think clearly in order to come out on top of that game. Knowing practitioners of Game theory know that inspiring fear in one's prey = advantage.

    People attack that which they feel assaults their self-importance. "Most people I know who champion [false] science over religion are victims of that hypnosis". Your ego took offense to the thought that it is hypnotized and so it sent a strong reaction up through your nervous system and you acted upon that by responding to me as you did. And you behaved as though this idiotic reaction was coming from the real you. It wasn't. That's the predator at work. Our predators are the enemy.

    >Do you allow the fear of ridicule from the authority figures you respect to dictate what you think about and explore?

    No, not really. Which authority figures would these be?

    Yes, yes you do, o

  174. NASA can help by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    send those disturbed people instructions to cut along the veins with their straight razor, not across, for faster bleed out. great opportunity to put long overdue shot of bleach in the gene pool.

  175. Bias of slashdotters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Q to the /. crowd: "Could 'doomsday' occur due to as yet unproven [Nibiru, galactic alignment, pole shift/crustal displacement, etc. etc.]?"
    A: NAH, you stupid idiots... (ha-ha-ha)...

    Q: "What about 'utopia' due to as yet unproven [man-machine convergence, nanotech-driven abundance, genetic manipulation, etc. etc.]?"
    A: WOOT, SIGN ME UP!

  176. But why? by DrZook · · Score: 1

    I wonder why people (even crazy ones) would want to kill themselves. I for one would be thrilled to witness the End Of The World.

  177. Re:Not stupid, just scared - just stupid by darthwader · · Score: 1

    I disagree. Some religion is based on fear, and some is based on hope. Just like politics.

    Some people get into religion because they want to control and dominate people, and some get into religion because they want to help people and to understand the world. Just like politics.

    Since I've already got 2 of the 3 dinner-table-conversation killers, I should point out that some people have sex to control and dominate others, and some have sex to celebrate and please others. Just like politics.

    --
    I hate it when I make a joke and I get modded "+5 insightful". Mod the stupid comments "funny", not "insightful", pleas
  178. Should be encouraging hysteria ... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    Pretty funny, right? Not according to Morrison: 'I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide. I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves.

    Just Think Of It As Evolution In Action.
    They die, they take their retarded genes with them as well as the consequences of their no-doubt atrocious schooling and probably their religion. And the downsides are .... nope, I don't see any, as long as they're hygienic about it. They take their children with them on a one-way trip to decomposition ... even better. Genes gone, schooling costs down, dumb-fuck ideas gone.
    We should be building suicide booths with easily-emptied meat lockers to encourage them.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  179. Like... not him :P by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Is it my fault that all the greats are either dead or off the air (same thing)?

    Sign of growing old, everyone you grew up with as idols is dead or senile.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Like... not him :P by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Agreed on the old. (Which is, of course, why I knew to post "Zombie Carl" :)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  180. Re:2012 by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

    One of the problems with te D&D movie is most of the plot was in the outtakes because they ran out of money to do the special effects for those scenes. You can see the roughcut footage in on the DVD extras. It makes a lot more sense with those scenes even if they are not rendered.

    --
    Sara
    Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World