Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: What To Do With Other People's Email?

vrimj writes "I have a common enough first name / last name combination that I sometimes get other people's email at my firstname.lastname@gmail.com account. It isn't a big deal if it is a person; I let them know, they fix it. The big problem I am having is with companies and websites. These emails are often no-reply, which means I can't send back a quick note. I got someone's credit card bills for three months before I realized there was nothing for it but calling the company (I tried a couple of emails first). Recently I got a notice about someone's kid signing up for a website. I don't have any option but to hit the response button, and tell them that I first have to say I am that kid's parent or guardian. I didn't know where to go from there. Today I get an invoice from a cable company; it is for a different state. I can't reply. I go to the online support, they tell me my only choice is to call the sales office. I gave in for the bank, but I am not talking to someone else's cable company. Is there any way to make emails to an improperly formatted gmail address bounce or do something else obvious? Is there a technical solution I am overlooking. I doesn't happen that often but it is an increasing PITA with no-reply email addresses. I hate just setting up a filter because that cuts off these other people who made a typo or had someone not enter something correctly, but it is looking like the best choice. It isn't spam, but it isn't my meat."

407 of 619 comments (clear)

  1. You're approaching it all wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This sounds like an opportunity to have a little fun. Request a few Miley Cyrus posters, or some KY his and hers samples. Send back a picture of your crotch. The possibilities are endless....

    1. Re:You're approaching it all wrong. by Defenestrar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If the emails of "please correct this address" don't work and if you get PII like this; you can probably turn the company in for violation of state or federal laws. Especially if it's ever medical related info (HIPAA). That'll get results fast.

    2. Re:You're approaching it all wrong. by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Considering there have only been a total of two fines issued to date for HIPAA related offenses, "fast" may not be a word you want to use. And the first fine was for a company not being able to provide patients with copies of their own medical information fast enough, not due to a data leak. The second fine was for a clinic losing boxes of physical medical records. So far there has not been a HIPAA fine for leaking electronic medical data. Yet.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    3. Re:You're approaching it all wrong. by beschra · · Score: 1

      But I'm guessing a threat of HIPAA action would put your complaint at the top of the list. Noone wants to be the one charged with the third fine.

      --
      It is unwise to ascribe motive
    4. Re:You're approaching it all wrong. by hawguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have the same problem, I particularly like the misdirected emails send by law firms - they invariably have a disclaimer saying that if I receive an email in error, I must destroy all copies of it.

      I like to reply and tell them that in order to comply and delete the email off of all devices that the email ended up on (which is at least 5 different devices), I'll need to bill them for the work. So far none of them has offered to pay the bill.

      I've often wondered if I could just spend an hour or two to go around deleting the email from everywhere it was delivered, and send them a bill. After all, they told me that I *must* do it and since it was their error that sent me the email, I shouldn't have to pay for it.

    5. Re:You're approaching it all wrong. by Quirkz · · Score: 4, Interesting
      There's a business in Australia called Qirkz which is just one letter away from my business, Quirkz. It must be a reflex to always type the U after a Q, because I get a lot of messages aimed at Qirkz, which is a music venue. I usually take the opportunity to send them an email explaining the differences and plug my own business and wares (a browser-based computer game, which at least *might* interest some Aussies). They can't call it spam, because after all they initiated the conversation by writing me.

      Still, after some time the barrage of email gets pretty annoying. Some of them are downright incoherent until I get the context of knowing they think they're talking to a music venue. Some woman started up about this "kid and bear show" one day that took three rereads to convince myself it wasn't spam for weird pornography. And when the place got shut down for a few months I ended up on the mailing list with a bunch of riotous music-loving Australians who wanted to save that other business.

      On a good day I settle for polite self-promotion, on a bad day I lean towards snippy sarcasm about spelling, and I'm waiting for a really bad day to rip them a new one for failing to get either of the hemispheres correct.

    6. Re:You're approaching it all wrong. by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2

      I am talking strictly about fines that have already been given out, not violations or alleged violations, which I am sure there are plenty of.

      But don't take my word for it. Go straight to the source -
      Violation #1 press release
      Violation #2 press release

      Until you can can provide citations for your claim, I am going with the official word from the Department of Health and Human Services. They have no motivation to cover up any fines they have given out.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    7. Re:You're approaching it all wrong. by flinkflonk · · Score: 1

      Actually these disclaimers are worth exactly as much as the paper they are (not) written on. You can't make people correct your mistakes, simple as that. In my limited understanding of legalspeak you "don't have a contract" and as such are not obliged to do anything the sender of said email wants you to do.

      Speaking of which, shrink-wrap licenses are illegal in most of the world outside the US (and maybe even there, what do I know), since you can't agree to a (one-sided) contract you haven't seen yet.

      If they force you to comply you just send them a bill. Don't ask if they want to pay a bill, they didn't ask you if you want to delete mail not meant for you, right? Either they back out of the (non-)contract and you can post their misdirected email on any website you like, or they pay, acknowledging that they had a contract with you. Win-win :)

      Anyway, I think the fun *really* starts with spam containing legal disclaimers.

      I think I don't need to tell you that I am not a lawyer since it is so obvious, so at least you're getting away without *that* disclaimer :)

    8. Re:You're approaching it all wrong. by harl · · Score: 1

      Shrink wrap licenses are legally binding contracts in the US, at least in the 7th Cir.

      The case is ProCD v Zeidenberg

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
    9. Re:You're approaching it all wrong. by jambarama · · Score: 1

      The disclaimer is unenforceable, they can't make you delete the email or do anything at all. Law firms add it so as not to waive attorney-client privilege if they send you any privileged information by mistake. With the disclaimer, if you get something by accident, it can't come in as evidence to trial. Without the disclaimer, they lose the privilege as to that material because they shared it with a 3rd party. IANAL (yet).

    10. Re:You're approaching it all wrong. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Law firms charge by the hour for things like letters and emails sent, so you should respond with a request for payment to do the work AND an invoice for the handling and email you just wrote. If it takes you 10 minutes to track down their billing address then that is 10 minutes you can charge them for. My free time is currently worth £10/minute.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  2. Delete it by kylegordon · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's not your meat...

    1. Re:Delete it by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Agreed. They're not his e-mails, and he shouldn't be involved. Let them figure it out as to why their e-mails didn't get received. Recycle those bits.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Delete it by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      Must... resist... weiner... joke...

    3. Re:Delete it by bdh · · Score: 4, Interesting
      It's not your problem. Don't make it your problem.

      I have a personal domain which has the same problem. My domain name is a four letter latin word (not wanting to slashdot my poor server, I won't mention the name). There's a Belgian rock band with the same name, a video game with a similar name, and at least one medical ward in a Boston hospital which uses a typographical variation.

      I used to be inundated with (a) Flemish grunge fans who were indignant that I had "stolen" the name of "their" band's website (fans, not the band itself), (b) people asking/demanding help in the game, and (c) confidential reports from the hospital. And when I say inundated, I mean I was getting between 3,000 and 7,000 spam/misdirected email a day. Probably 50 of those a day were misdirected emails that weren't flagged as spam.

      Ten years ago, I used to send back a boilerplate "this isn't the web site you're looking for" response to these guys (I set up a script in the Bat mailer I was using at the time). The results I got for this were:

      a) the grungers demanded I give "back" my domain to their favourite band;
      b) the gamers told me "I'll never buy another one of your effing games again"; and, for the win
      c) the hospital types said "you have illegally intercepted confidential medical data, we're going to sue you into the ground"

      To be fair, there were a number of "oops, sorry, thought you were the other guys" apologies (and one rambling email in Portuguese from a woman who wanted to know if she should marry her boyfriend whom she didn't love, and should wait for Mr. Right instead)

      Nothing ever came from it, other than my deciding to say the hell with it. Most of it was nonsense, but it could easily become a time suck.

      More recently, I've started getting "confirmations" from companies that my application has been pre-approved. This isn't spam, it's actually some bozo using my email address, despite giving different address/phone information when applying. The fact that he's getting these pre-approvals says something about the approval process, to be sure. I called the first few, thinking maybe my account had been hacked, but it's just someone else (it's always the same address he gives) who doesn't seem to know his own email address.

    4. Re:Delete it by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      Damnit, I was so curious, now I know things like "'razorgrind', a combination of grindcore with death metal, stoner rock and metalcore" .. I think that was written in Latin. Man wikipedia, why does so much "music" count as notable? A myspace page != notable. And, of course, I learned a new Portuguese word.

      Lift me up o' great skycrane
      Like a statue upon dome
      I will preach freedom
      Leading the criminals home

      ### if you find connections in that *cough* poem with what I wrote above, well .. I'm sorry you are as insane as me.

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
    5. Re:Delete it by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 2

      I have a personal domain which has the same problem. My domain name is a four letter latin word (not wanting to slashdot my poor server, I won't mention the name). There's a Belgian rock band with the same name, a video game with a similar name, and at least one medical ward in a Boston hospital which uses a typographical variation.

      Deus, right ? Belgian pop knowledge FTW ! Also 1995 called and wants their web design back ;-) I mean, frames, seriously ?

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    6. Re:Delete it by nospam007 · · Score: 2

      "I have a firstname.lastname@gmail.com account and my name isn't very common, but I've still received a number of emails that were intended for someone else with the same name."

      Exactly the same here!
      It must be a very sick guy with a very small penis, because they send tons of Pharmacy and Penis-enlargement mails to this person.

    7. Re:Delete it by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Since these people are so clueless it wouldn't be hard to misdirect them to blame another website.

      Set up a filter that automatically posts these messages on Twitter or Facebook, and have each one responded to with something like "Thanks for submitting your message to the our Twitter account! Click here to see your message!"

      Twitter gets all the abuse and people learn a valuable lesson.

      PS. Don't do this unless you have good lawyers.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:Delete it by stiggle · · Score: 1

      Seeing as Muse are a British band - that narrows it down even more.

    9. Re:Delete it by fuzzywig · · Score: 1

      Dealing with other people's emails takes up your valuable time, but as a nice person, you still want to help the mial get where it's supposed to. Solution: Take 10% of the mis-sent emails and use them for identity theft purposes, and use the resulting income to fund your work on the other 90% :)

    10. Re:Delete it by Double+Drop · · Score: 1

      Wow, no kidding. I haven't seen a web page like that since the glory days of webpagesthatsuck.com

      --
      WarGear - Risk Everything
  3. uh, change your email address? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Occam's Razor and all that?

    1. Re:uh, change your email address? by kvvbassboy · · Score: 1

      No. Simplicity on surface hiding underlying complexity (from having to notify 500 contacts about your email address change) is not Occam's Razor. Occam's razor would be to simply delete it, or mark them as spam.

    2. Re:uh, change your email address? by marnues · · Score: 1

      How does Occam's Razor apply?

    3. Re:uh, change your email address? by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Even better, he should just change his name, since it's obviously too common.

    4. Re:uh, change your email address? by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      Bingo.

    5. Re:uh, change your email address? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I know switching email addresses is annoying and all, but comparing it to moving?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    6. Re:uh, change your email address? by BeaverCleaver · · Score: 1

      I couldn't afford a personalised vanity licence plate for my car, so I changed my name to suit the plate I already had.

      Regards,

      Mr RSW-824.

  4. I know it may sound insensitive by jawtheshark · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Frankly... Filter them out. It is not your job to fix their problems, because in fact that's what you suggest doing. The companies got those email addresses from their client and if they didn't it is and it belongs in your junk folder. Getting on the phone with those companies costs you time and money, and that's where it ends.

    I would not suggest filtering out all messages that contain "no-reply" or similar in their From field. I'd suggest that if you get such a misdirected message, you add a custom filter directly to trash (not Junk, that may screw the Bayesian filter). Try matching on the subject or so, for example, for the cable company it typically will have a subject "CableCo Bill of 06/2011", then filter on Subject: "CableCo Bill".

    The example you gave with the kid was most likely on purpose done by the kid. I'm pretty sure a kid trying to activate an account would try with a phony email or something else, not realizing that in fact that won't bring them closer to activation. If it does, the activation of the website they applied for is broken. (Besides, really, a clever kid just makes his own "parent email account" and circumvents the system).

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    1. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by Fwipp · · Score: 2

      I don't have as common a name as the submitter apparently does, but just two weeks ago I got mail from a sheriff's office concerning a domestic dispute the intended recipient had been involved in. It was probably just clerical error, but I'm very glad I was able to correct the mistake.

    2. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Yes? You were nice enough to contact the Sheriff and notify them of their error. That's nice, but in no way your obligation. You may have been on a three week vacation and read it when it was too late. Still, setting up manual filters for every occurrence as I described in my post covers this situation, as the Sheriffs mail would have ended up in your Inbox and you would have read it. The decision on what to do would still be left to you. This falls into the category of "reply-able" emails which is not the actual problem the "Ask Slashdot" person described. His problem was mainly with the non-reply-able addresses. My comment covered those. Anyone with a normal email address can still be informed by a quick note. That doesn't take much time and doesn't cost much money. However, as it is not your obligation, it is down to your own ethics.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    3. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify: I don't recommend calling them because it costs you time and money. In this case, liability might go both ways. Inform them and you're liable because you have gotten information not for you, or -as I suggest- delete the stuff and be liable because you didn't inform them you were not the intended person. In the legal sense, I fear that both decisions can get you into trouble.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    4. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Heh, strange, I'm really surprised no one's suggested that you're morally obligated to turn yourself in to the FBI for illegally invading other people's privacy... you're not allowed to open other people's mail even if it is addressed to you :-P

      So legally, the safest thing to do is just filter/delete the thing as soon as you realize it's not for you.

      That said, I suspect this could become a new SPAM technique, if it isn't already.

      But of course, the legal or even the safe thing to do isn't always the right thing to do, and you want to be a good samaritan and help people out, even if they aren't your neighbors. That's good! The world could use more people like you, even if some people take advantage of it. If it's straightforward, then go ahead and keep on spending your time solving other people's problems, as long as you can stay out of trouble. Karma++ . Just remember to CYA and be ready to accept the worst if something bad comes of it.

      My university uses the silly initials+serial number scheme to create email addresses, so I sometimes get email for university people that I will attempt to forward properly, just as some kind of alumni courtesy.

      But beyond that, yeah, filters. If you can configure your filters to bounce/reject incoming mail in such a way that doesn't acknowledge that there's a human reading it, then sure, use that to try to alert the company that there's a problem (but beware of SPAM e-mail address harvesters that are using social engineering to verify if an email address has an actual human reading it - that's why you should never respond to any kind of SPAM, but just filter & delete it silently).

    5. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by TavisJohn · · Score: 1

      This is the best option. If the companies can't get their shit together, it is not YOUR responsibility to fix it.

      The only time I have ever called on anything similar is when I kept getting letters in the (snail) mail from the IRS in regards to someone who lived here before me. (Like 2 owners ago) But I only called when I got a card on my door stating that this person had an appointment with a real person. THEN I had a real person to call.

      Otherwise, it is not my problem. The company is not going to tank me for pointing out their mistake. And the person who is supposed to get the e-mail is not going to thank me for fixing it either.

    6. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by Fwipp · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I really severely misread your post. I didn't mean to imply that it was an obligation, but I guess I came off that way.

    7. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      I'd suggest that if you get such a misdirected message, you add a custom filter directly to trash (not Junk, that may screw the Bayesian filter).

      But it is junk. Quite literally, because it is unsolicited e-mail. If a bank can't be bothered to properly implement opt-in, then they get what they deserve.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    8. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      I get emails for people who used a fake address on my domain as a throw-away address when they signed up for some web account. That's no different than someone else signing me up for junk mail; I have every right to ask the sender to stop, even if that ends up deleting the original person's account.

      Someone out there lost a lot of Southwest Airlines mileage points because the requirement for bonus points was to sign up for their email newsletter for 6 months. After two I emailed customer service and had it canceled, pointing out that they had given a false address. Sucks to be them I guess.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    9. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by ChrisGoodwin · · Score: 1

      I'm actually quite happy to put them in spam. If there is, for instance, a university that some kid who has no business in university (I'm looking at you, "Cor Ey", and if by some small chance you are, in fact, reading this you are, in fact, an idiot) signs up for with a bogus address, and they don't send a fucking confirmation link, they deserve to have their outgoing emails marked as spam.

      Same goes for cable bills, etc. The people who's responsibility it was to make sure those emails don't get to me are... not me. Maybe if someone's cable gets cut off for nonpayment because their bills went into the spam folder, instead of the snail mail box as God and Ben Franklin intended, they'll work harder at getting their own fucking email address right.

      --
      Pretend there is some witty statement here.
    10. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      It is junk, if it is unsolicited (I fscked my markup and somewhere the word "spam" got swallowed in the italicized part of the post). The thing is, that Bayesian filters learn and these emails are legit, just not for you. Assume you train your Bayesian filter to ignore these, you have the risk that it will start to ignore emails from your bank as Junk too as those will most likely be similar in content and scope. That's not something you want. That said, I don't think a bank should communicate with you by email on a regular base. It's fine when you have a particular problem and you emailed them and they reply, but apart from that your bank should never initiate communications by email.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    11. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by Bieeanda · · Score: 1

      and they don't send a fucking confirmation link

      This is really the fucking worst. It's bad enough when I get shit e-mails asking me to confirm it's okay for little Jimmy to join the Furry Animal Fuckbarrel Jamboree site, where he can play flash games and send messages to pedophiles and spend hundreds of dollars on microtransactions. It is just that much more fucking annoying when they just take your address 'on good faith' and make you have to jump hoops to contact tech support and deactivate the account.

    12. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Bayesian filters learn. Mark too much legit looking email as spam and legit email will end up as spam. Consider that before marking anything as spam, you might be condemning your future legit mail to your spam folder. It's exactly for this reason that there is a "reset training data" button in Thunderbird. As these Bayesian spam filters are pretty much black boxes, it makes it really hard to find why exactly a legit email has been marked as spam. I use JunQuilla now, because it gives me a bit more insight.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    13. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      It would take a much worse legal system than we currently have to reach a point where deleting an e-mail without reading it can get you into trouble. The opposite, acting on an e-mail you shouldn't have received, certainly can. There's a very good reason legal proceedings so often still require proof of physical delivery of something to a person in order to proceed. If you are physically served with a legal document and you are not its intended recipient, you damn well better make sure that's cleared up lest you become a guilty party too. E-mail intended for someone else? Get rid of that as soon as possible.

    14. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      where deleting an e-mail without reading it can get you into trouble

      .... How to you find out it's not for you without reading it? :-)

      Snarky comment aside, I am actually advocating deleting those emails (If you'd bother reading the full thread, you'd know that). It's just that if you start to look into the issue, you could be in trouble either way. The "deleting" option being the less risky one.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    15. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      So, first, if it's Gmail and stuff ends up in Spam, I can still go read it -- I don't get enough spam that I can't at least glance through it to see if anything was classified incorrectly.

      Second, I'd do this specifically for those services which can't be resolved in some five minutes of my time. For instance, if it includes a link for me to click on if I'm not the intended recipient, I'll do that, and consider it not to be spam. If it's just a confirmation email and there's no obvious way to deal with it, delete it and ignore it, but not spam. If there's no way to stop receiving them (and hopefully make someone else's life easier) without picking up a phone, it's spam.

      Of course, look at my email address -- I don't have this problem at all. I have far more actual spam, because I display my email address unfiltered on Slashdot.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    16. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      >> My university uses the silly initials+serial number scheme to create email addresses

      Your serial number is "2"? Wow, you are old. You must have gotten on slashdot back in 1000s day just to see what these youngsters were doing.

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
    17. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by hey! · · Score: 1

      I once had this problem because of a collection agency. The problem was that they were robo-calling my cell phone two or three times a day. They left no contact information other than a website and voicemail phone number, both of which *only* had options for paying bills, not reporting errors. Using the domain registration data I finally discovered the name of the law firm that owned the collection agency. I called them up and told them the problem, but the calls continued. Finally threatened to sic the state attorney general's office on them, One of the benefits of living in the business "unfriendly" People's Republic of Massachusetts is that the AG's consumer affairs office isn't afraid to kick a little butt, especially on an out of state company. That got their attention and the robo calls stopped, but if they'd used one of the domain registration anonymity services I'd have have been SOL.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    18. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      Any email without a valid reply or unsubscribe link is Junk Mail. Send them all to spam.

    19. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by vux984 · · Score: 1

      That got their attention and the robo calls stopped, but if they'd used one of the domain registration anonymity services I'd have have been SOL.

      No. Your telco should be able to identify where the robo calls are coming from, especially once you've involved the legal system...

    20. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by Ambvai · · Score: 1

      I had a similar problem with my Google Voice account. Since I was getting daily calls from a collection agency since the first day I set that account up, I didn't give it out. Instead, I redirected that number to call the front office of the debt collection agency. They stopped calling after about a month (!) of calling themselves two or three times a day.

    21. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by Skreems · · Score: 1

      Call me crazy, but I thought you had to confirm ownership of a phone before you could forward calls to it in Google Voice...

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    22. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Sucks to be them I guess.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.

      I admit, I laughed a little.

      --
      +1 Disagree
    23. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      and they don't send a fucking confirmation link

      Oh, God, this.

      My own experience: My gmail address is FirstInitialLastname@gmail.com. Note that I have a very uncommon last name. Anyone with the same last name is very likely a distant relative. First batch of misdirected emails started with invitations to a garden planning group in Goshen, Indiana. I ignored the ones that were clearly mass-mailings, and responded to the personal ones addressed to "Jane" informing them that they had the wrong person. I haven't gotten one of these for awhile, so it seems to have cleared itself up. The last one was a doozie, though. Got an email to a Halloween party in Goshen with the instructions, "Come dressed as either a drag queen or an Amishman." Sounds like it must have been one heck of a party.

      Then I started getting PSN messages for someone named "Jared". I'm not particularly surprised that Sony has security issues, since they apparently don't even understand the importance of sending a confirmation link during account setup. I'll admit, it's been a little surreal seeing all the "We're sorry about our security problems" emails that are intended for someone else.

      Then the really weird one: If any /. reader is considering an online dating service, I'd strongly recommend *not* going with Match.com. The first time I saw an email message with Match.com in the subject line, just deleted it, assuming it was some referral spam that slipped through the filter. Later that day, when "Here's your Match.com profile information" showed up, well, let's just say my interest was grabbed.

      Apparently, Match.com's understanding of security is *so* bad, that, not only do they not send a confirmation link, but they also send the full account info *including password* to whatever address you put in when you sign up. I am in possession of match.com account credentials belonging to a 65-year-old woman in Raleigh, NC. And then the activity updates started coming in. "OldCowboy1947 likes your photo." "Grandpa39 winked at you. Do you want to wink back?" 3 days of this was enough.

      I'll freely admit, the call of the Dark Side was strong. There was a constant voice saying, "Troll this. Troll this *HARD*" But in the end, my better nature won out. 1) I'd like to think I'm not the sort of person who would mess with a 65 year-old-woman's love life for my own amusement, and 2) She's likely related to me. (Distant 3: didn't feel like collecting the granny-porn required for proper trolling.)

      Not that Match.com made it easy to do the right thing here. All my attempts to contact their customer support only resulted in auto-responses from the ignore-o-bot. Eventually the bot that reads their support requests decided that what I really wanted was to stop receiving email notifications and promised to stop sending them. Not exactly, but close enough. Assuming Ms. Raleigh is still paying the bill, the credentials I have are probably still valid. Probably would have gotten better results by signing into her profile, adding "Mistyping my email address" to her interests, and changing the profile pic to Bea Arthur with the caption "WTF? Wrong Email Address?"

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    24. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Assume you train your Bayesian filter to ignore these, you have the risk that it will start to ignore emails from your bank as Junk too as those will most likely be similar in content and scope.

      Except the bank name will be different, and the Bayesian filter will cue on that, at least after you've trained it with e-mails from your bank.

      When the global Bayesian filter keeps dropping that one bank's e-mails, maybe the bank will wake up and fix their opt-in procedure.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    25. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by PhreakOfTime · · Score: 1

      Why?

      Did they also have the incorrect physical address and you were worried about them busting down your door? Seriously, your email is not tied to your physical address.

      It's not your problem that other people make mistakes, and it deserves ZERO of your time.

    26. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      The upthread suggestion was that once you discover a misrouted message, you immediately reconfigure to dump all additional mail from that source into the trash. That's how you delete something without reading it. If I stop five lines into the message and say "this isn't meant for me", dump in the trash, and put all future copies into there automatically, I can certainly claim I never read even a single full e-mail from that source. Misrouted e-mails are toxic; unless you really do know the intended recipient, you have to minimize your exposure to them and eliminate them as quickly as possible from your life.

      I'm not sure why you made that "if you'd bother reading.." comment as if I was disagreeing with you. I know, it is so rare now that someone replies to a message to add support to that person's opinion instead of trying to roast them.

    27. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I have a similar situation with snail mail. I receive mail for the local swimming pool. The swimming pool used to have my address. They're still located where they always were, but they've been renumbered about 12 years ago, when my house was built. And for some reason, they haven't sent address updates to lots of people.

      And I don't mean just unimportant companies harassing them with offers, I mean the national swimming federation, legal look stuff, and when wanted to get my water (or gas?) hooked up when I moved here, the water (or gas?) company wanted to know which of 5 water (or gas?) meters at my address I was talking about. I'm not bankrupt yet, so I assume I'm not paying for the swimming pool's water (or gas).

      What's most amazing of all, is that the swimming pool seems to be functioning fine. Apparently all that mail they're missing isn't all that important. Water (or gas)? Apparently as long as they pay, it doesn't matter if the mail goes to me. (Actually, I don't get that much mail, so now I'm worried that maybe they're getting some of my mail.)

      Another fun recent discovery: we found an official website about swimming pools that lists our address for that pool. Reminds me of that time the national skiing federation put our phone number in their flyer.

    28. Re:I know it may sound insensitive by PhreakOfTime · · Score: 1

      Not if it's the sheriffs office I don't.

      Around here, that's a quick way to get charged with a felony possession of govt property. You see, authority doesn't usually like it known that they are making mistakes, and will put the blame and hardship on the kind person who points them out, instead of taking responsibility for it.

  5. Not your problem. by grub · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Mark it as spam and delete it.

    Most people will ask "Did u getz my e-Mailz?" the moment they see you. When the intended recipient replies in the negative, they will clear things up.
    If it was a company sending it, it's still not your problem.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Not your problem. by ngc5194 · · Score: 1

      Delete it, but don't mark it as spam. Why? Because it's not actually spam.

    2. Re:Not your problem. by Zebedeu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't mark them as spam.

      If you do and they are legitimate emails, then you'll be training your filter (or worse, everybody's filter, if you use a web-based client) to flag real emails.

    3. Re:Not your problem. by grub · · Score: 1

      I've had spam come in to different accounts looking legit (i.e.: "Hi Mary, this is Dave. I found a great deal on a house in Florida.") Maybe it was legit but off to spam they go.

      Besides, the gmail filters are quite smart One person marking spam won't affect it globally (much) if everyone else accepts the mail.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    4. Re:Not your problem. by Zebedeu · · Score: 2

      1. The author said that the emails were legitimate.

      2. Notice I didn't mention Gmail in my post. Certainly Google, Yahoo and Hotmail have enough users that your contribution wouldn't be enough to poison the filters, but in a smaller provider, it might happen.
      Also, even if you're using Gmail, why risk it anyway? Why not simply use the delete button which is right next to the spam?

    5. Re:Not your problem. by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Most people will ask "Did u getz my e-Mailz?" the moment they see you.

      No, only lolcats will ask that.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    6. Re:Not your problem. by grub · · Score: 1

      1) maybe they were legit, as I wrote, I've had lots that look legit but are likely well disguised spam. 2) You didn't mention gmail, the fellow asking the question did. When I hit the Spam button it pretty much guarantees that I won't see mail from that person again. Delete has no benefit like that.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    7. Re:Not your problem. by Maestro4k · · Score: 1

      Don't mark them as spam.

      If you do and they are legitimate emails, then you'll be training your filter (or worse, everybody's filter, if you use a web-based client) to flag real emails.

      When I get E-mails misdirected because some bozo used my E-mail address by mistake from a business and there's no "was this a mistake, click here to opt out" it gets flagged as spam. I don't give a damn if it's the business' mistake or the user's mistake in giving the address, but with 1. no confirmation of the address and 2. no opt-out, I consider it spam at that point. Legitimate businesses do at least one of the 2, most do both. Failure to do either means it's no longer my problem if all your E-mail starts getting spam-filtered at the provider. In fact, I hope it does, just to teach the business a lesson in proper E-mail mailing list etiquette. Besides, I'm pretty certain that not having an opt-out available violates the CAN-SPAM act, so they're not only morons, they're probably breaking the law. (I've never received misdirected E-mails from non-US businesses.)

      If the business has done things properly and there's an opt-out I will take the time to opt-out. If it's an E-mail trying to confirm the address I delete it unless it's one of those "if you want to continue receiving messages from us do nothing", then I do whatever's necessary to prevent them from considering the address confirmed. Other than that, I tend to delete most of it. Some things I inform the sender just because I see potential problems if they continue to send stuff to me. (Like the teacher who was E-mailing me about someone's kid. I nipped that on in the bud ASAP before she inadvertently told me anything potentially confidential about the kid.)

    8. Re:Not your problem. by Zebedeu · · Score: 1

      When I hit the Spam button it pretty much guarantees that I won't see mail from that person again.

      You're contradicting yourself. Just two posts up you were saying that your marking an email as spam had no noticeable effect on the Gmail spam filter.

      Furthermore, you're confused as to how spam filters work. Marking an email as spam doesn't automatically make all emails from that sender go directly to the trash. The filter only looks at the content of the mails, not the sender, because those can and are spoofed all the time.
      For that you have the traditional filters -- simply create a rule that bins directly all emails from that sender.

      Your attempts to use the spam filter are failing in every regard: it doesn't achieve the functionality you want, and you're poisoning the filter for everyone else.

    9. Re:Not your problem. by Zebedeu · · Score: 1

      You seem to be using the spam button to somehow punish the business in question.

      I've nothing against that. My argument is that by marking legitimate emails as spam you're poisoning the spam filter rules, and making it harder for the filter to distinguish between legitimate and truly spammy email.

      Worse, if you're doing it on a webmail client, you're essentially poisoning the communal filter. Now fortunately, for a popular email service like Gmail, one person's actions won't have much effect, but I guess every bit helps, and I was hoping that others wouldn't follow the OP's advice blindly.

      To sum up, I don't care about the other guy's business. Punish them all you want if they're pissing you off, but I do care about the quality of my spam filter, and I thought others would as well.

    10. Re:Not your problem. by enFi · · Score: 1

      [...] you're poisoning the spam filter rules, and making it harder for the filter to distinguish between legitimate and truly spammy email.

      Worse, if you're doing it on a webmail client, you're essentially poisoning the communal filter.

      Not necessarily. I hope a good spam filter takes the recipient into account as context. E-mail from Verizon to me? Spam. E-mail from Verizon to my co-worker with FiOS? Maybe not. E-mail addressing Mr. Smith delivered to neo@? More spam.

    11. Re:Not your problem. by grub · · Score: 1

      When I mark something as spam, I often never see the mail from that person again. It's more of a personalized thing perhaps. I'm well aware of how spam filters work, they do look at header information as well as contents.

      It works for me, ergo, I shall keep doing it.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    12. Re:Not your problem. by amias · · Score: 1

      only if its a very badly designed shared filter , it should be saying this is spam when sent to this domain/recipient

      --
      [site]
    13. Re:Not your problem. by Zebedeu · · Score: 1

      That'd be the same as individual spam filter rules for each email address, and would defeat the benefits of having a shared spam filter.

    14. Re:Not your problem. by amias · · Score: 1

      only if it was a very very crap spam filter.

      most spam filters i've worked on use weightings and so when importing this information it would add a strong weighting for
      that user against that mail and not so strong weighting against the mail for other users. Other users could have weighting
      for this mail as ham which should cancel the weighting against not to mention many other mitigating factors.

      a good spam checker rarely rules out a message on a single criterion.

      Toodle-pip
      Amias

      --
      [site]
    15. Re:Not your problem. by Zebedeu · · Score: 1

      Well, if you've seen the spam filter algorithm that Google, Yahoo or Hotmail are using, then I concede the discussion.
      I've only looked at local, single-user mail filters, such as the one in Thunderbird.

      Though I don't believe that.

      In any case the OP said that he marked the mail as spam so he'd never see mail from that sender again. I don't think that spam filters work like that, otherwise if I were to receive spam with a spoofed from address belonging to a friend of mine, then I'd never be able to receive mail from that person again.

    16. Re:Not your problem. by Maestro4k · · Score: 1

      You seem to be using the spam button to somehow punish the business in question.

      No, I'm flagging businesses that have E-mail behavior that is spam, even if that business is supposedly a legit one. Like I said, not having an opt-out method is a violation of the CAN-SPAM act, see here: http://business.ftc.gov/documents/bus61-can-spam-act-compliance-guide-business

      5. Tell recipients how to opt out of receiving future email from you. Your message must include a clear and conspicuous explanation of how the recipient can opt out of getting email from you in the future.

      It's not my fault if a company decides to violate the law and be a spammer, even if it's accidental. I'm flagging something that is spam (no way to opt out) as spam. If this means the business' legit customers are hurt, it's the business' fault for doing things wrong, not mine. They need to learn to get their act together, and it's not my place to teach them, so I flag it as the spam that it is and go on with my life.

      For what it's worth, I'd also be pissed at a business I was a legit customer of for handling their E-mail that way, simply because I know there's a good chance they're going to end up with their E-mails marked as spam.

  6. Why not just ignore it? by Doctor+O · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Really, why not just ignore it and throw it all away? If people sign up with the wrong addresses, they might as well notice it themselves...

    --
    Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?
    1. Re:Why not just ignore it? by CrowdedBrainzzzsand9 · · Score: 2

      Because it can snowball, fast. This happened to me twice on a gmail account. If the person making a mistake sends messages to a group, then everyone in that group now has your email address; I'd get a long conversation via the reply-alls of his correspondents. I emailed one of his correspondents and explained, since I wasn't sure of the correct email address. That one recurs now and then since I'm in so many group mail lists of his friend and biz associates.
      And I started getting lots of please-please-come-back messages from a service he stopped subscribing too, which had no way to talk to a human.

      The other major fiasco was getting on a busy senatorial re-election mailing list. I wasn't even in the same state. That wasn't too difficult; the would-be senator's home page had an opt-out...but you had to look hard for it.

      In both of these cases, ignoring it would've been more annoying than going to the trouble of ending it.

    2. Re:Why not just ignore it? by Threni · · Score: 1

      Have some fun with it then. A friend used to get phone calls from a hairdressers with a phone number which was a transposition of 2 digits of his phone number. He phoned and pointed out that perhaps there'd been a mistake in a recent advertisement, but the guy who answered it was dismissive, and the phone calls continued. He starting booking appointments for anyone who phoned him; the phone calls soon stopped after that.

    3. Re:Why not just ignore it? by DaScribbler · · Score: 1

      Something similar happened to me. There's a guy out there that has a similar username as me but would constantly either mistype it or forget to add his numerical digits to the end of his username, and as a result I found myself on several mailing lists. Informal mailing lists (not actual lists, just a circle of friends auto-replying to each other) that get your email address can act like a virus as they spread everywhere.

      Sometimes a kindly worded message (or twelve) would get me removed from the circle of people replying to each other. But there was one occasion where I found myself receiving mails from a group of guys who coordinate all their golf games. I was polite the first couple of times I requested they remove my email address, but eventually my requests became less than friendly. Just about the time I started musing on the idea of getting on a plane and showing up to one of their golf expeditions and bringing just one club, they must have had the same thought occur to them, because it suddenly all stopped.

    4. Re:Why not just ignore it? by DaScribbler · · Score: 1

      Ooops, in the above recounting I forgot to mention that during the course of trying to remove myself from their mailing list, there was some unwarranted and not so nice return correspondence.

    5. Re:Why not just ignore it? by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Like what? "F U buddy for having the email address I think belongs to my friend"? How can anyone be mad at you for being at the address they're sending stuff to?

    6. Re:Why not just ignore it? by WhitetailKitten · · Score: 1

      Let me guess, you're an Apple zealot?

      I would've said "Republican," but to each their prejudices, I suppose.

    7. Re:Why not just ignore it? by Doctor+O · · Score: 1

      While I see your point, I'm pretty sure all of those would disappear by marking a handful of those as spam in your MUA and have ye olde Mr Bayes deal with the rest.

      --
      Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?
    8. Re:Why not just ignore it? by Doctor+O · · Score: 1

      Aw, c'mon. I was being helpful 15 years ago, too. Nowadays there's just too many idiots to cope for, which is why the OP asked his question in the first place.

      --
      Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?
  7. Filter by pluther · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Direct the email into the trash.

    If the person who was supposed to get it cares, they'll call the company and ask why they're not getting it, and fix the address then.

    If they don't care, then it doesn't matter.

    We all get email we don't want or care about. Dump it.

    --
    If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    1. Re:Filter by tick_and_bash · · Score: 1

      I agree here. I delete anything that's not for me appearing in my personal email. I have kept the more interesting ones. I figure since he's not my child, I don't have any responsibility sorting out his crap.

      If it's my work email address, I direct requests to IT and let them sort it out if it becomes a problem. If it's a random one off, I'll email/call them back and they're usually quite quick to sort it out.

  8. Tell the person by TwiztidK · · Score: 2

    Let the person these emails are supposed to be going to know that it happens a lot so they can correct it, assuming you can find their email address .

    --
    Sent from my iPhone 5
    1. Re:Tell the person by jawtheshark · · Score: 2

      Oh, come on... That' s pretty much next to impossible. He says he has a common name, let's assume "John Smith" who is subscribed to CableCo in State ST. That's it. If he really has a very common name/surname combo I can assure you there will be hundreds of "John Smith" in State ST. Finding them, with the limited information you have, is even more time consuming and expensive than calling CableCo.

      If the address of said "John Smith" is in the bill, you have a better chance, but still, it will cost time and money. Don't do it. It's their problem.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    2. Re:Tell the person by sonnejw0 · · Score: 1

      I also have received a few mistyped emails, where my email address contains no period between my names, someone else's is the same but does contain a period. I have not received important information, just friends of this other person typing in the wrong address. I've simply responded letting them know and I have not gotten them in a long time, but if you're getting important stuff like bank data, then email the person they are supposed to be going to to let them know. I RECOMMEND NOT FORWARDING THE EMAILS, i.e. the emails with bank account information, because that will probably upset someone possibly into suing you for hacking or something dumb like that. People are paranoid these days.

      In addition, I have filled out my online profiles to include state of residence and a photo picture just in case anyone is searching for a person they know they can verify very quickly that I am not that person. It helps.

    3. Re:Tell the person by MrOctogon · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure gmail accounts are unique regardless of periods. You can use no periods, or periods between every letter in my gmail address, and it will still get to me.

    4. Re:Tell the person by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Tangent here, but I wonder if there is some improvement in modern times as to parents naming their kids incredibly common names. Just personally, if my last name was "Smith" and I had a kid "Joe", "John", "Sue", "Sally", etc would all be off the table immediately. It would have to be Plaxico Smith or something like that.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    5. Re:Tell the person by belphegore · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what I do. I have 3 people who commonly misuse my gmail address, and all share my name. One is a retired Air Force colonel in Virginia, one is a real estate agent in Texas whose wife uses his email address for her clothing design business a lot, and the most recent is an Australian whose daughter has recently gone off to college and uses her dad's email address for some reason. I enjoy vicariously living part of these 3 folks lives. I have found all 3 of their real email addresses, fairly easily, and I forward their mail to them. Generally this encourages them to be more careful about not mis-entering their email addresses on web forms, etc. and in insisting on the correct spelling when giving their addresses to others, thereby reducing the future burden on me. I think all 3 of them greatly appreciate it when I do forward the mis-directed mail to them, and generally I don't twice get misdirected mail from the same source: they do fix the sender's problems for me. If the 3 of them weren't so geographically spread it might be harder -- but there are almost always clues in the email as to whether the intended recipient is in Texas, Virginia, or Australia -- or whether a teen girl, retired AF colonel, or realtor/clothing designer.

    6. Re:Tell the person by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 1

      Um... I did exactly that. I had received an email from an educational institute, a credit card company, and a theatre club, all addressed to someone with a different first name. My email address is just my last name, so I kinda expected I'd eventually get wrong emails, but this was all email addresses manually provided by this other individual to these companies. With the three emails, I decided I had enough info to do some quick research. I found out who she was, where she worked, etc., and got her correct email address. I then replied to all of the companies, copying her, requesting they correct their records to reflect the correct email address. When they refused, I reset the password on all of the accounts, changed the email address, then clicked on the "reset password" link again. I then emailed the original person telling them what I did because I was tired of receiving their emails. It took less than a half hour, was fun to research, and resolved the issue. It can be done (sometimes).
       
      I'll admit that the amount of data available from these simple emails was a bit scary... I could have dropped by her house or gave her parents a ring with the data I found in that short search.

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
    7. Re:Tell the person by EricWright · · Score: 1

      Wow ... I've had entirely different experiences than you have.

      http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2222466&cid=36377112

    8. Re:Tell the person by base3 · · Score: 2

      I don't know -- I think a common name would be of benefit from hiding among the results in search engines, etc. There aren't many Mr. Base3s in the world, and someone searching up my information pretty much gets me. I was never under the illusion that everything online wouldn't be archived and searchable, so it's not a problem--but it would be nice to give children a name that made it hard to dig up dirt on them later.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    9. Re:Tell the person by mcmonkey · · Score: 2

      Enjoy your stay at PMITA prison.

      You're admitting 'hacking' in to someone else's account and changing the account details? Are you insane?

      Likewise,

      and tell them that I first have to say I am that kid's parent or guardian

      Enjoy having to notify your neighbors about being on the sex offenders list. Why would you pretend to be the parent of some strange kid on the internet? Yes, if I take you at your word, you're going out of your way to help. On the other hand, if I'm a local official who wants to look tough on cyber-crime, you're a predator.

      I have a not-so-common FirstNameLastName@gmail.com address, and I also get occasional email meant for someone else. One time I was getting family newsletters, and I did reply to let the sender know I was not who he thought I was.

      But the obvious answer is, spam filter. Contacting the sender is nice. Impersonating someone else online is a crime. Impersonating a minor's parent or guardian is insane.

    10. Re:Tell the person by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

      periods are ignored in the email address.

      abc@gmail.com
      is the same as
      a.bc@gmail.com
      a.b.c@gmail.com
      etc..

    11. Re:Tell the person by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      I ended up calling my namesake down in Arizona, who evidently just could not grasp that our shared firstname.lastname@gmail.com belonged to me, not him.

      I got that phone number because he put my email in to receive his property assessment.

      Never got the guy on the line, but the voicemail seemed to do the trick.

    12. Re:Tell the person by Zenaku · · Score: 1

      I had a similar experience. Got an email from an out-of-state vineyard I'd never heard of confirming my "order" had been shipped. I had no idea who it was intended for, and I do not have a common name. I was a little worried that somebody may have opened an account in my name, and may be using my credit card number or something.

      So I used their "forgot my password" link to have the account password sent to the email address on file, logged in, and made sure that wasn't the case. (I could have grabbed HIS stored credit card info, or at least ordered a shitload of wine to be shipped to randomly selected addresses, but dammit, I'm just not evil enough). Then I changed the email on file to a fake address and logged out.

      The odd thing was that the account holder's first and last name weren't even remotely similar to mine. Makes me think maybe that company has a hosting or e-commerce provider in common with some other company that I have done business with, and some account records in a database somewhere got shuffled somehow.

      --
      If fate makes you a motorcycle, you become a motorcycle.
    13. Re:Tell the person by michelcolman · · Score: 2

      According to the White Pages, there is 1 person called Plaxico Smith in the US.

    14. Re:Tell the person by bwintx · · Score: 1

      Correct. Google's info about this: link.

      --
      Discussion System prefs link: http://slashdot.org/users.pl?op=editcomm
    15. Re:Tell the person by Idbar · · Score: 1

      Well, I tried for a long time. I ended up using a filter altogether with a vacation reply to notify about the issue to anyone.

      The reply message was along the lines of "You're trying to reach the wrong person. Please let the person know that his subscriptions to xxxx, yyyy, are arriving also to my account.". My advantage was that this person was living in another country so I got to filter most of his e-mails just by using the country's two letters.

      I has been a long time since I get "personal" e-mails, I still get some subscription messages, but now that I read many people's comments, I'm changing the setting to trash them.

    16. Re:Tell the person by Sancho · · Score: 1

      I have first.last@gmail, and I occasionally get mail for firstlast@gmail. It's pretty irritating. I used to reply and say they had the wrong person, but the idiots sending me mail refused to change their address books.

      I've also had people accuse me of first playing a joke, then lying to them when I said I wasn't this guy. They were relegated to the bitbucket rather quickly.

      The worst part is that periods aren't supposed to be meaningful in Gmail addresses.

    17. Re:Tell the person by Zelucifer · · Score: 1

      How could you possibly believe, even for a second, that claiming to be a child's parent or guardian, over the internet, would result in any criminal charges? Is he going to somehow use this claim to lure the child to his house and have his way with him? Has this claim resulted in any contact (let alone sexual) with the child, whether written, verbal, or otherwise?

      --
      The corner of a round room
    18. Re:Tell the person by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, might you not want to name them something incredibly common? In this age of people ruining their lives via Facebook and the Streisand Effect, the gift of anonymity might be one of the most important things you give them.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    19. Re:Tell the person by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      I think you have the right idea. To all those who say "just delete it," well guess what: some of YOUR email may be going to them. If you are helpful, they are 10x more likely to be helpful to you. Of course to avoid the whole problem, you should NOT be using your name as part of your email address. Do what I do - use some super long string of words that everyone always says "there must be some explanation behind THAT" when the see it. Like: "joemammashouldeatpizzathenvomit@gmail.com."

    20. Re:Tell the person by nschubach · · Score: 1

      There's was also a study done a while back that attributed names to success, but I'm too lazy to find it now.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    21. Re:Tell the person by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      How could you possibly believe, even for a second, that claiming to be a child's parent or guardian, over the internet, would result in any criminal charges?

      100% agreement there. Lying about your identity or otherwise impersonating someone else is NOT a crime unto itself. It only becomes criminal when combined with intent to defraud or otherwise commit an actual crime.

      That's not say that some cop or DA with a stick up his ass won't decide to screw with you for their own reasons. But that's a risk you take all of the time anyway, if someone with power has it out for you, you are screwed no matter what.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    22. Re:Tell the person by stillnotelf · · Score: 1

      I know a guy with a common name who got an eviction notice from his landlord. He asked why; they said he was a sex offender who had failed to register. Of course, it turns out there was some other guy who was sex offender with the same common name, and somebody somewhere had failed to use ANY identification other than firstname lastname when deciding to try to kick him out. (He pointed out their mistake and wasn't evicted, but still, huge trouble from his common name.) So, the common-name-effect cuts both ways.

    23. Re:Tell the person by Ambvai · · Score: 1

      They discussed that in the Freakonomics movie too. The conclusions they drew was not that names aren't linked to success, but people with the attributes that are more likely to be successful [wealth, education, status, etc.] are more likely to name their children certain things. And about half to one generation later, less successful people will start copying those names and the more successful people will latch onto a different set of names.

    24. Re:Tell the person by wazza · · Score: 1

      Yep, same problem here. I have a firstname@domain.com address, and I get multiple daily messages from people who enter addresses wrongly, people who give addresses wrongly, all the usual suspects. Tried for a few weeks to reply nicely to them all, but now I can't be bothered. My life is too short, and my time too limited, to clean up other people's mistakes like that.

      The only ones I sort out manually nowadays are those that either:
      a) relate to things I actually want my *own* account on (this happened with people registering for LinkedIn, amongst other things, with my address)
      b) things that are really quite important - one poor bloke had a huuuuuuge tract of information, business and personal, entered into an account on some site... and accidentally put my address in as the contact. I spent the time contacting him, and sorting it out, because he had a lot of business he might have lost.

      But the rest? The receipts for apartment rent (from the UK)? The innumerable misdirected resumes? The order confirmations? The random "hey, how are ya" messages? The possibly-important "here is the powerpoint presentation for this morning's meeting" attachments? The people who sign up for Apple IDs with my e-mail address? Sorry, just because you made this my problem by typing an address in wrong doesn't mean I have time to fix your problems for you. Straight into the bit bucket, baby... another donation to /dev/null.

    25. Re:Tell the person by qubezz · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you don't understand how periods work in gmail. first.last@gmail is the same account as firstlast@gmail. fir.stla.st@gmail is still the same account. Your email address is the one without any periods. The periods are ignored. There is no other person that has the other account, the senders have very wrong address information about the intended recipient.

  9. Ignore it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have a bunch of common throw away web mail accounts similar to fake@yahoo.com, nobody@hotmail.com etc..

    It is funny how many people sign up for accounts and use those addresses for confirmation. I have about 10 myspace, facebook, photobucket, photo sharing sites etc accounts at my disposal.

    Just ignore them. If a company is sending a bill to first.last@here.com and that it is coming to you, either the real first.last is an idiot and gave them the wrong address or you are getting spam.

  10. Careful by Anrego · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It isn't spam, but it isn't my meat.

    It sounds like this isn’t the case, but I’d point out that “accidently” sending email to the wrong person is getting more traction as a spam and phishing technique. I’ve seen stuff recently (I have a fairly common email too) that goes way beyond the classic and obvious “hey man, here’s the projections you wanted. You were right, you should invest in SomeShitStock right away!”. Again, the stuff you talk about sounds legit and you probably already know this, but just incase, be-careful!

    As to the actual post. I do much as you do. If it’s an actual person, quick reply sorts it out. If it’s automated and there is an _obvious_ support or admin email link (most businesses seem to have a “if you have received this in error” link now) I’ll do. But as you said, there is a point though where you have to draw the line at how long you’ll play phone tag for someone else’s benefit. I always figure stuff like that eventually works itself out anyway. I don’t want people going through billing nightmares, but unreasonable is unreasonable.

    On that note I’d point out that any company _billing people_ over email should have one of those activation link via email dealies. Most web forums have that, you’d think a cable company could manage to confirm an email before sending out personal info (in fact, here in Canada I think they legally have to).

    1. Re:Careful by KillaBeave · · Score: 1

      It isn't spam, but it isn't my meat.

      It sounds like this isn’t the case, but I’d point out that “accidently” sending email to the wrong person is getting more traction as a spam and phishing technique. I’ve seen stuff recently (I have a fairly common email too) that goes way beyond the classic and obvious “hey man, here’s the projections you wanted. You were right, you should invest in SomeShitStock right away!”. Again, the stuff you talk about sounds legit and you probably already know this, but just incase, be-careful!

      As to the actual post. I do much as you do. If it’s an actual person, quick reply sorts it out. If it’s automated and there is an _obvious_ support or admin email link (most businesses seem to have a “if you have received this in error” link now) I’ll do. But as you said, there is a point though where you have to draw the line at how long you’ll play phone tag for someone else’s benefit. I always figure stuff like that eventually works itself out anyway. I don’t want people going through billing nightmares, but unreasonable is unreasonable.

      On that note I’d point out that any company _billing people_ over email should have one of those activation link via email dealies. Most web forums have that, you’d think a cable company could manage to confirm an email before sending out personal info (in fact, here in Canada I think they legally have to).

      I actually got my first one of those today. It read like this.

      WRONG NAME WITH CORRECT FIRST LETTER CORRECT LAST NAME, we're emailing you to inform you that you are the only living heir to Amanda CORRCT LASTNAME's estate of $25.9 million dollars ...

    2. Re:Careful by readin · · Score: 1

      It isn't spam, but it isn't my meat.

      It sounds like this isn’t the case, but I’d point out that “accidently” sending email to the wrong person is getting more traction as a spam and phishing technique. I’ve seen stuff recently (I have a fairly common email too) that goes way beyond the classic and obvious “hey man, here’s the projections you wanted. You were right, you should invest in SomeShitStock right away!”.

      That sounds like something useful to know. I have a name that is common and I work at a large company - and since I got here first my address is the one without the middle initial. It is not uncommon for me to receive email for other people. Instead of forwarding to that person and CCing the sender, I should probably just forward the email in case someone is phishing for email addresses. I can't just delete the email because most of it is legit and important.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    3. Re:Careful by Kashgarinn · · Score: 1

      Use the 2 minute rule. If it takes less than 2 minutes of your time, then go for it, if it takes more, then delete it.

  11. Same problem here by falloutboy · · Score: 2

    I too have a very common firstnamelastname@gmail.com. For personal emails, I just reply and let them know they've got the wrong falloutboy. One guy, a screenwriter in LA, gave my address to a lot of his family, so I had to have kind of an awkward exchange with his mother and one of his aunts who CONTINUES to send me photos of her young son. This is weird stuff I don't want in my inbox.

    For the DirecTV emails, I submitted like 15 messages to their general customer service inquiry form. That took like four months to get completely cleared up.

    Once I got looped in on an email thread where the other three people were high school kids using Facebook, so my only method for actually communicating was that I had to add as a friend a high school girl. I'm a 30 year old man. My wife was less than thrilled.

    1. Re:Same problem here by EQ · · Score: 5, Funny

      I got looped in on an email thread where the other three people were high school kids using Facebook, so my only method for actually communicating was that I had to add as a friend a high school girl. I'm a 30 year old man. My wife was less than thrilled.

      Congressman Weiner, is that you?

      --
      Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo! http://goo.gl/J9bkO
    2. Re:Same problem here by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      . I'm a 30 year old man.

      On the internet, you can be ANYONE.

    3. Re:Same problem here by ferongr · · Score: 1

      You missed an event flag.

    4. Re:Same problem here by gnapster · · Score: 1

      anthonyweiner@gmail.com doesn't sound so common, to me.

    5. Re:Same problem here by arth1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      The solution is simple enough: Change your name to "Vorokrytin P. Winterbuttocks", and I can guarantee you that it won't be a problem in the future.

    6. Re:Same problem here by kmdrtako · · Score: 1

      I have firstinitiallastname@gmail. Some ditz (probably blond) in Ohio with the same firstinitiallastname (and as near as I can tell is probably really firstinitiallastname@yahoo) has given out the gmail address and may still be giving it out for all I know.

      I know she's in Ohio because some of the mail I have received that was obviously intended for her had her snailmail address, along with other personal information. Looked her up on switchboard at that address, etc., etc. I realized something was up when I started to get a steady stream of spam that all started with "Dear Kristie, thanks for responding...." I had someone in another state where there are lots more lastnames send her a snailmail letter asking her to knock it off. Don't know if it had any effect, figured it couldn't hurt to try.

      But mostly I just get spam targeted at her, and gmail's spam filters are pretty good and sorting it into my spam folder.

      And why on earth would you use your real facebook account to friend an unrelated teenage girl? Or tell your wife? GAC. Honestly, based on a sample size of one, I'd say Facebook's subscriber numbers are inflated by a factor of two or three. Oh, their T&Cs that say no phony accounts? Yeah right. Get real. They do whatever they want -- can you say privacy? -- I'll do whatever I want. And of course I don't have anything private in my real account either.

    7. Re:Same problem here by KainX · · Score: 1

      Classic. I'm really wishing I had mod points right now. ;-)

      --
      Michael Jennings | HPC Systems Engineer, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab | Author, Eterm (eterm.org)
    8. Re:Same problem here by SocPres · · Score: 1

      The solution is simple enough: Change your name to "Vorokrytin P. Winterbuttocks", and I can guarantee you that it won't be a problem in the future.

      That's what Joey Joe Joe Junior Shabadoo thought. Poor guy.

    9. Re:Same problem here by Chysn · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, Vorokrytin P. Winterbuttocks changes YOUR name.

      --
      --I'm so big, my sig has its own sig.
      -- See?
    10. Re:Same Problem Here by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      You're not the only one. One former occupant of my house owned a business -- a "restaurant for kids" -- that not surprisingly went out of business. They moved to another state, but we still get tax and collections notices which the post office won't deliver to anyone but us.

    11. Re:Same problem here by gknoy · · Score: 1

      Explaining a fake Facebook account created to talk to a 16 year old to your wife sounds MUCH more challenging. Additionally, the kid is likely going to realize it's a fake account and ignore your pleas to drop your e-mail from their list.

    12. Re:Same problem here by pudding7 · · Score: 1

      Hey, that's MY luggage combination!

    13. Re:Same problem here by V.+P.+Winterbuttocks · · Score: 1

      Honey?

      --
      I'm the real Vorokrytin P. Winterbuttocks.
    14. Re:Same problem here by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Why wouldn't you tell your wife? If you discuss stuff like this upfront rather than waiting for her to "find" it, things go over much better (especially when you're not actually doing anything wrong)

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    15. Re:Same problem here by Macrat · · Score: 1

      I can guarantee that you will still get spam. ;-)

    16. Re:Same problem here by nickruiz · · Score: 1

      I had a similar problem from a person who registered an Xbox Live account under my email address. I couldn't find a way to contact the person, so after several months of getting his Xbox ads, I decided to log into his account and contact his friends to tell him to change his email address. (Probably not a smart idea.) That didn't work. After over a year, I finally got frustrated enough that on April Fools' Day (2011), I logged into his account and changed his avatar from a "lolz im so cool look at ma slipknot shrt n shades" to "elf fairy toddler wearing flower bell-bottoms". You would have thought that he would have got the hint after having to reset his avatar 3 times in the middle of his game, but he still didn't change his info.

      In the end, I just set a filter to trash his messages. Moral of the story, it's not worth tracking down 95% of these problems.

    17. Re:Same problem here by Phydaux · · Score: 1

      Yes! Lets all change our name to Vorokrytin P. Winterbuttocks.

    18. Re:Same problem here by kmdrtako · · Score: 1

      Why wouldn't I tell her? Seriously? ROTFLMAO.

      I tried that early on in my marriage -- long before FB obviously. A cutie at work was hitting on me. I thought it was funny, told my wife. Big mistake. If it were to ever happen again you can bet I won't be telling my wife about it. Nothing's worse than being in the doghouse when you haven't done anything wrong.

  12. Not your problem by kitserve · · Score: 1

    Delete it. If it keeps coming through from an individual source, set up a rule to automatically delete it. It's the only solution that isn't going to take up more and more of your time (apart from abandoning the email address).

    --
    https://alephnull.uk/
    1. Re:Not your problem by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      Delete it. If it keeps coming through from an individual source, set up a rule to automatically delete it.

      And, if you have access to your e-mail server, have the server reject it with a 5xx response code. For one thing, it might get you removed from lists on legitimate sources.

    2. Re:Not your problem by kitserve · · Score: 1

      The OP mentioned that it's a gmail.com address. If they had the power to reject it with a 5xx response, they'd presumably have google.com address instead.

      --
      https://alephnull.uk/
    3. Re:Not your problem by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      In Google's case this might be true, but it's certainly not true across the board. My users can blacklist senders, causing mail from a particular sender to a particular recipient to 550 after the RCPT TO command.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
  13. Ignore it. by snarfies · · Score: 1

    I ignore it. It isn't my responsibility to route somebody else's email. And if I'm stuck on somebody else's email address, I set up an filtering to 1) discard all email from that address, and 2) send an autoreply to unsubscribe, which may or may not annoy somebody at the sender's origin.

  14. ignore them by stewartjm · · Score: 1

    It's been happening to me for ages. I just ignore any emails that are obviously intended for someone else. It's not my job to fix it.

    I also get a chuckle when I receive emails with a disclaimer which claims I MUST destroy the email if I'm not the intended recipient. It's such an incredible display of arrogance.

  15. "Report spam" to keep them out of your inbox by CmdrPorno · · Score: 1

    Beyond that, if they're personal e-mails, I usually reply and tell them they have the wrong address. If someone sets up online billing, it's their responsibility to ensure that they're receiving the e-mails. It's no different than if you failed to get a bank statement or credit card bill via snail mail--you know you owe the money, and need to call in to find out how much.

    --
    Sent from my iPhone
  16. Write a letter by Fnordulicious · · Score: 1

    My solution to the problem was to look for the person’s name and address in the billing information being sent to me. Obviously writing them an email is impossible. So I wrote one person a nice letter warning them about the issues of fraud and identity theft, asked them to fix their email address records with various companies, and encouraged them to be more careful with their personal information. It worked, all the stuff from one lady no longer appears in my inbox. Unfortunately *someone else* has started to do the same thing, so I’ll need to dust off that letter soon.

    1. Re:Write a letter by jjk3 · · Score: 1
      It's sad, but this seems really risky to me.

      Your letter could end up going to an ass hat who has some power and no idea about technology. This could spiral out of control to end up with you looking at their private financial records and the sending them "veiled" threats about "identity theft". Who knows maybe you even hacked it so the email would come to you!

      Even if these ridiculous accusations are found to be untrue it could be a major pain to deal with.

      Unfortunately doing the right think like this, especially in the United States, is not worth the risk.

  17. "bounce" in Mail.app by j-beda · · Score: 2

    For Apple's Mail.app there is a "bounce message" which returns something pretty much like a "no such address" type of response. There are probably plug-ins for Thunderbird that do the same, but where I looked for them I mostly found plugins that "redirect" mail to addresses of your choice keeping the headers intact - so there may be an issue with terminology that might complicate your search for a solution.

    1. Re:"bounce" in Mail.app by yruf · · Score: 1

      MailRedirect may do that for Thunderbird: http://mailredirect.mozdev.org/ and https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/thunderbird/addon/mail-redirect/ though comments sound like it doesn't work with the recent Thunderbird build.

    2. Re:"bounce" in Mail.app by arth1 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      For Apple's Mail.app there is a "bounce message" which returns something pretty much like a "no such address" type of response.

      Great. Now the n00bs think that Apple invented bounce too.
      Bounce has been around since before September (no, not 2010; the September), but is on the way out of mail clients because most spam e-mails are Joe jobs, where the Sender and/or Reply-To is some unsuspecting guy who had nothing to do with the e-mail. So Bounce tends to do more harm than good these days, and is better left as an expert option, hidden from normal users.

    3. Re:"bounce" in Mail.app by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      Please do not ever use this POS function. Bouncing after the receipt of email is bad hygiene. Your bounces are not going to who sent the email but to whoever they forged the from header. Your just creating more spam.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    4. Re:"bounce" in Mail.app by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      RTFS. He's talking about legit mail, not spam. Even automated no-reply boxes notice a bounce, so this is a good answer.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    5. Re:"bounce" in Mail.app by chemosh6969 · · Score: 1

      Which doesn't do much considering most of these types of emails are sent from a no-reply address.

    6. Re:"bounce" in Mail.app by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      My point is all legit mail should be after a confirm email. To send things without one from automated systems is broken the only way to see it fixed is mark it as spam. If gmail stops accepting any mail from them they will fix there broken system. This is best practices for all sorts foe automated email it's really not a hard process.

      End user tells you what there email address is.
      Send confirmation email with secret code.
      End user enters secret code (could be as simple as clicking a url and logging in)

      I'm not talking about person to person email here but all the automated bits.

      As to the bounce message bit it's broken by design. There is no way to insure that the from address is really the sender so sending bounces will get your mail server on black lists rather fast. I've had to filter those at the mail server end so they never go out. Apple forgot about 30 years of email good hygiene when they put that thing in. If you want to bounce an email do it when your still talking to the sending machine never after.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    7. Re:"bounce" in Mail.app by pdboddy · · Score: 1

      Great idea... bounce messages to DO-NOT-REPLY addresses which reply to your bounce which you bounce back...

      Careful, that one's heading for the trailer park.

      And bounce is not what the OP was looking for.

      --
      Julie Moult is an idiot.
    8. Re:"bounce" in Mail.app by j-beda · · Score: 1

      I suspect that any well thought out no-reply address systems do in fact pay attention to proper bounce messages (those sent by the SMTP server). If a "pseudo-bounce" message generated by a email program has similar impact, I do not know, but for the occasional piece of misdirected email, it probably is worth a try.

  18. Same thing here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have an uncommon first.last name combo, but still end up getting signed up for weirdest things... there appears to be a kid in Croatia with the same name, and of course, there's no way to reach out to him and inform him of the mistake he repeatedly makes.

    As a last ditch effort, when he finally signed up to facebook [with my email], I reset the password, logged in and messaged a few of his new friends that this is "not the John Smith you are looking for", politely explained the situation, and asked them to kindly inform their friend to change his password. Due to age more than anything, they totally freaked out [thinking I haxxored into their account to steal all their info... or something:], as the wall posts of "OH MY GAAAWD!!!" quickly followed... but the dude does seem to be more careful since :)

    1. Re:Same thing here! by fast+turtle · · Score: 1

      Hell I got a bunch of facebook spam and finaly had to take action. Simply reset the damn account pw and changed it to something nice and complex using a random generator then posted on the wall "FOAD you idiots". I also changed the profile to look like a psycopath in prison. Worked nicely as I no longer get any facebook spam.

      --
      Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
  19. UNSUBSCRIBE by DoomHamster · · Score: 1
    1. 1. Click Reply All.
    2. 2. Subject "UNSUBSCRIBE"
    3. 3. ???
    4. 4. Profit
  20. Seconded, delete it. Don't look, fix, or help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know it sucks, but in a sue-happy world that one nice thing you do for someone could be misconstrued as an invasion of privacy. Then being helpful turns into an angry back and forth from someone who doesn't understand it was their mistake to begin with. Worse yet they claim you looked at their incredibly-privileged-yet-somehow-goes-through-email messages that has now totally harmed them.

    Just delete these emails. Create a filter, make sure you're not storing stuff anywhere, and leave it be.

    -Matt

    1. Re:Seconded, delete it. Don't look, fix, or help by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know it sucks, but in a sue-happy world that one nice thing you do for someone could be misconstrued as an invasion of privacy

      ... wait, you mean a sue-happy country, right?

    2. Re:Seconded, delete it. Don't look, fix, or help by arth1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A sue-happy world.
      About a decade ago, long before this became a common problem, I got an e-mail meant for someone at a .co.uk address, but they sent it to .com instead. I replied that they had the wrong address, and if they could please update it so I didn't get their e-mail, I would appreciate it.
      The result was that I got a scathing reply back, implying that I was a criminal, and that this would be reported to the police.

      The problem is that those who can't even be bothered to enter a correct e-mail address aren't going to bother reading the technical details, nor figuring out what or where the problem is, and will likely draw the conclusion that you somehow stole their e-mail.

      I'm tempted to automatically put all e-mails to my domain that isn't for me on a web page, for public consumption. While most of them are obviously spam, some appear to be quite, um, interesting if you have odd kinks. As long as I announce this as a public service, would I be in my rights to do so?

    3. Re:Seconded, delete it. Don't look, fix, or help by mlts · · Score: 1

      I have that happen all the time with a gmail account of mine. I have a filter, look through to find if the mail is relevant to me, then just purge the mailbox with the misguided stuff in it. Chronic people who send in error, I just blacklist their E-mail addresses.

    4. Re:Seconded, delete it. Don't look, fix, or help by losfromla · · Score: 1

      whitehouse.com?

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    5. Re:Seconded, delete it. Don't look, fix, or help by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      Of course you would be in your rights, but since when has that stopped people from suing?

      if you have money for lawsuits then post them or reply or make phone calls. If you don't, just delete them.

      I made the unfortunate mistake of getting lastname@popularfreewebmail.com many years ago. I get bombarded with emails from friends, neighbors and teachers, talking about how Timmy did on a test or the barbecue next month. I use to reply and get "oh sorry!" back, but now I just delete them, it's just too risky

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    6. Re:Seconded, delete it. Don't look, fix, or help by magarity · · Score: 2

      Why do people assume they can be successfully sued for all sorts of things? Everyone's a lawyer.

      Whether the suit is successful or not isn't as important as the threat of the suit itself. Sure, you can defend yourself against a lawsuit: hire a lawyer, go to the lawyer's office, go to court, etc. Counter sue for your legal expenses. But an annoying lawsuit that you defend against can eat up years of your life and all your savings. Your lawyer wants to be paid up front when defending you, not like a contingency paid lawyer in a big injury suit. And then you have to actually collect even if you win a judgment for expenses and the collection process might not work out.
       
      So people assume (correctly) that they can be sued for all manner of dumb things and they assume (correctly) defending against a stupid suit is time consuming and expensive. Lives have been ruined by lawsuits that were eventually successfully defended against.

    7. Re:Seconded, delete it. Don't look, fix, or help by Technician · · Score: 1

      I had that response once before. Those letters often come from collections who think you are the deadbeat trying to avoid the company.

      I reply to have them have their lawyer to contact my lawyer and give them the name of my lawyer. I then advise them my lawyer's rates to settle the false accusation and defamation suit of the Joe Job complete with a link to the Wikipedia article on Joe Job.

      They most often quickly get the message they have the wrong Joe.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_job

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    8. Re:Seconded, delete it. Don't look, fix, or help by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      Considering you're posting AC, I'm going to assume you have nothing to back up this story.

    9. Re:Seconded, delete it. Don't look, fix, or help by onepoint · · Score: 1

      You are more or less right. Now also look at some 3rd party sites that have figured out Google's retention policy. I never get it right but from what i understand, even deleted it's sitting in some server for 90 to 120 days. I'm sure i am wrong about that but get your own clarification. I hope that it never comes to haunt this poor guy.

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    10. Re:Seconded, delete it. Don't look, fix, or help by telchine · · Score: 1

      I'm tempted to automatically put all e-mails to my domain that isn't for me on a web page, for public consumption. While most of them are obviously spam, some appear to be quite, um, interesting if you have odd kinks. As long as I announce this as a public service, would I be in my rights to do so?

      Like this?

    11. Re:Seconded, delete it. Don't look, fix, or help by jbezorg · · Score: 1

      Just delete these emails. Create a filter, make sure you're not storing stuff anywhere, and leave it be.

      Agreed. You are accepting the responsibility for correcting their mistake.

      Very much like I case I heard where a guy left his phone at a McDonalds. He called back and a manager said they had the phone and that they would hold it for him. Something happened to the phone, don't remember what. Maybe naked pictures of his wife got released on the internet. Naturally he sued and he won because of this.

      Wish I could give you a better reference.

      --
      I've lost all my marbles except one & It's fun to test angular & centripetal acceleration in my skull
    12. Re:Seconded, delete it. Don't look, fix, or help by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      The difference is that in Britain and South Africa (and most other civilized nations), frivolous lawsuits get dismissed with prejudice, and the person filing the lawsuit often gets asked to pay for the court costs not only of the defendant, but of the state, too.

    13. Re:Seconded, delete it. Don't look, fix, or help by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1

      I know it sucks, but in a sue-happy world that one nice thing you do for someone could be misconstrued as an invasion of privacy.

      ...

      Just delete these emails. Create a filter, make sure you're not storing stuff anywhere, and leave it be.

      -Matt

      I'm afraid I can't recall when or where, and my Google skills are failing me, but I thought I remembered a case where someone sent important and time-sensitive info to the wrong e-mail address, and the unintended recipient just deleted it. Because he didn't take "reasonable action to notify anyone of the error", he was on the hook for some sort of liability.

      Or maybe my memory's just fuzzy.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    14. Re:Seconded, delete it. Don't look, fix, or help by w0mprat · · Score: 1

      sue-happy world

      World? Ridiculous anyone-sue-anyone-for-anything lawsuits are very much an American insititution, in the rest of the world they are just entertaining Only-In-America news articles.

      --
      After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    15. Re:Seconded, delete it. Don't look, fix, or help by PE512 · · Score: 1

      You are accepting the responsibility for correcting their mistake.

      Exactly. As Bunk would tell him, "There you go, givin' a fuck when it ain't your turn to give a fuck."

    16. Re:Seconded, delete it. Don't look, fix, or help by baegucb · · Score: 1

      I'm not the AC, but this might br what he was talking about http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/03/mildenhall_website/
        It sounded sort of familiar, so I googled it.

    17. Re:Seconded, delete it. Don't look, fix, or help by jbezorg · · Score: 1

      Actually, think I've found the case number and state

      CV-2008-4379-4 Arkansas
      http://www.onpointnews.com/docs/nudephotos.pdf
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7744345.stm

      As of yet, I can't find if there was a ruling or if it was dismissed / settled. No luck on courts.arkansas.gov, findlaw.com or justia.com.

      --
      I've lost all my marbles except one & It's fun to test angular & centripetal acceleration in my skull
    18. Re:Seconded, delete it. Don't look, fix, or help by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      Um, Top Secret documents can't be sent via email! The highest classification allowed is Secret and it must be encrypted. My company deals with classified docs all the time.

      Assuming you are right, when this hypothetical guy got Top Secret docs in his email, it was then automatic proof he was a hacker. How else would he have gotten it? Don't even need a trial, no government employee would ever make a mistake!

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    19. Re:Seconded, delete it. Don't look, fix, or help by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Nice find. Of course, the story got twisted to "he got arrested for computer hacking and espionage", where the actual story was that he just pulled the plug on his site voluntarily.

    20. Re:Seconded, delete it. Don't look, fix, or help by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Um, Top Secret documents can't be sent via email!

      They certainly can. It may not be legal, and they're supposed to be encrypted, and all that. But it's certainly possible to send any sort of text document, classified or not, and encrypted or not, via email.

      It wouldn't surprise me at all to find that some dummy with a clearance did so, and then arranged for the victim (i.e., the recipient) to be charged with the offense. And they might not have been a dummy. There are quite a few countries in which you can be charged with the crime of receiving documents without a proper clearance. That's a fairly standard way of framing your victim. Just arrange for the document to be sent to them "by accident", and tip off the security police that the victim's residence should be searched for illegal documents.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    21. Re:Seconded, delete it. Don't look, fix, or help by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

      Just let them know...
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malicious_prosecution (they know they're in the wrong)
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation (reporting to the police)
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_of_privacy (your email is for private correspondence)
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_light (reporting it to the police paints you in a ...)

    22. Re:Seconded, delete it. Don't look, fix, or help by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Here's a thought, If something is time sensitive either A) don't use e-mail or B) Have the *intended* recipient reply when they get it so you know it went through. Not bashing you, just the idiot that (if this is true) filed the suit.

    23. Re:Seconded, delete it. Don't look, fix, or help by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      A few months ago I began receiving all sorts of Vonage account information. I thought someone had opened an account in my name, but in reality it was a type in the subscriber's email address. I contacted to Vonage to clarify the error, also just to make sure I was correct. I continued to receive account-sensitive email and digitized voicemails until I contacted the account holder directly at his email address. I made sure to explain what I was sent to me, how I responded, and such. It gave the person some ease knowing the extent of any privacy invasion. Very recently, I received a sensitive attorney-client email. I had absolutely no idea why my email address ended up in cc: but I didn't know of the parties involved. The moment I realized I was reading an attorney-client message, I stopped reading, then immediately contacted the sender to let them know. Again, I explained how far I read and reassured the sender. Neither episode went beyond the initial contact, so there's no guarantee the response will be hostile.

    24. Re:Seconded, delete it. Don't look, fix, or help by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Legally, possibly not. It depends on how the courts in your jurisdiction have interpreted it (if at all). The situation is analogous to the legalities of letter sending - the letter becomes the property of the recipient, copyright remains with the sender.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    25. Re:Seconded, delete it. Don't look, fix, or help by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      A sue-happy world.

      I'm curious what country you're living in (actually, no, I think I can guess) ... because there are very few nationalities that generalize their conditions of life to the rest of the world.

    26. Re:Seconded, delete it. Don't look, fix, or help by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1

      Oh, I agree that the case I mentioned is a stupid one. I just wanted to point out that a) in our current environment, you could be damned if you do, damned if you don't, and b) none of us are lawyers.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  21. common enough and.. by tirnacopu · · Score: 1

    The big problem I am having is with companies and websites.

    Is your name Billing? Sony Billing?

  22. So you dont want to filter it... by djsmiley · · Score: 2

    but you also don't want to bother fixing it....

    Fix: Get a different email address.

    --
    - http://www.milkme.co.uk
    1. Re:So you dont want to filter it... by houghi · · Score: 1

      I am sure he already thought of that and decides his email must be his name, so get a new name.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:So you dont want to filter it... by pdboddy · · Score: 1

      Oops, got your neighbors snail mail. Gotta move houses now.

      Oops, wrong assignment in my work inbox. Damn, gotta get a new job.

      Damn, someone called the wrong number, and I have to get a new phone number.

      Brilliant idea.

      --
      Julie Moult is an idiot.
    3. Re:So you dont want to filter it... by djsmiley · · Score: 1

      1. You tell your neighbour

      2. You reply,

      3. You tell them while your talking to them.

      In all 3 of your "examples" you have some form of contact with the party who is mistaken. He doesn't easily have this (infact he has it, and refuses to use it)

      --
      - http://www.milkme.co.uk
  23. Start using a different address away by the_olo · · Score: 1

    It seems from your description that this is becoming a significant nuisance.

    So just get a new account, with a non common e-mail address, notify all your contacts and start using that.

    On the original account, put an automatic reply notifying the sender that they probably got a wrong address.

  24. I had the same problem... by ospirata · · Score: 1

    .... and 1 month ago I found out that I was co-authoring a paper in Veterinary.

  25. do what we used to do... by bmo · · Score: 1

    Post them to alt.flame. Deleting your own email address, of course.

    --
    BMO

  26. Ditto by ChrisGoodwin · · Score: 1

    If it's a personal email, I mail them back and let them know they've got the wrong guy. If it's some web site that they've signed up for, I'll try to log in and leave a comment to their profile. I've gone as far as poked around for phone numbers and called and texted them (that freaks people out, but... not my problem). I'll also often change the email to "not(address)@(domain)" and even sometimes randomize the password.

    Some of the no reply ones I've marked as spam, and there's at least a couple of people (individuals) who I've emailed back more than once and told them I'm not their guy. No response, and continued emails. Those go into the spam folder also.

    --
    Pretend there is some witty statement here.
  27. Google does this to me by LearnToSpell · · Score: 1

    Somebody signed up for Orkut Brazil with an address for one of my domains (catch-all caught it). I'm perfectly happy to "give" them that address, and have it forward somewhere else, but of course I can't contact them. Dear Google: if you're going to continue to spam me, have a fucking contact address. I know you're all very busy doing no evil, but maybe *some* point of entry would be useful.

    I just set it up so that any mail there bounces to all the abuse@ addresses I could find, but that's not the greatest solution.

  28. A better approach by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 2

    Write to your Congresspeople asking them to create a law requiring businesses to address the problem, sort of like a second anti-SPAM act. Write to the Consumer Protection Bureau (if it gets off the ground), the FTC, or whatever other jurisdiction the sender may fall under. Write articles to your local paper--if you write well, it's an interesting enough problem they may well publish it.

    --
    -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    1. Re:A better approach by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 2

      Your solution is entirely possible provided there is an existing privacy law covering the situation, if the appropriate agency is notified.

      However, your "simple solution" of holding businesses accountable *requires* someone to hold them accountable. That means the government, which means the appropriate agency, as I referred to. Writing to your Congressperson about the problem may be for more legislation (to create the "existing" privacy laws you do not actually identify), or it may be they can help you by referring you to the appropriate agency--which they sometimes do.

      Piping everything to /dev/null makes the user's life easier but does not address the underlying problem.

      --
      -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    2. Re:A better approach by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1

      "There should be a law!" is not a leftist reaction, but an authoritarian one, which rightists are just as prone to reverting to as leftists. See also: recreational drug use, abortion...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    3. Re:A better approach by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      See a problem? Solve it by putting a new law on the books! Bonus points if that law adds more work for compliant companies and people, while remaining practically unenforceable against those who don't comply.

    4. Re:A better approach by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 1

      maybe we could just have 50 state laws instead? :)

  29. Your making the problem worse. by tempest69 · · Score: 1

    If there is an expectation that email will be handled correctly even if sent to the wrong address, then people get more careless. Companies get more lax in their procedures. The problems frustration equilibrium stays at a higher value. Much like people typing in captcha values for nonsense, it ruins it for everyone.

  30. JUST...DELETE...THEM by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    I know I'm not the first to say it, but seriously, just delete them if they are not yours. It is not your responsibility. Better still, as others have said, filter them out if they are cases of recurring senders.

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  31. Header issue? by gavort · · Score: 2

    my GF has been getting a bunch of these for someone else that has the same first initial as her. After getting a few very personal email replies obviously directed at this other person, she attempted contact (as these folks were replying to an email this other person had sent). There was much confusion between the two of them until I suggested that I look at the headers. It seems that this other person had configured their mail client to set the "Reply To" header to be my GF's email. Unfortunately, even upon trying to explain to this other person what was going on, this other person won't/can't fix it so she is apparently going to be stuck never having anyone be able to reply to anything she sends out. It's kind of frustrating, because it's such a simple fix/problem, but seems to be out of the realm of non-techie folks.

    1. Re:Header issue? by gknoy · · Score: 1

      An automated bounce message that explained the issue ("It lookes like your friend Pat.Smith set his reply-to address as P.Smith. This is an automated message ... but he didn't read what you sent") sent to every single person that e-mails you as a reply to something from him might work. I haven't a clue how I'd set something that complex up in my mail client, though.

    2. Re:Header issue? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      That should be quite simple to fix with a procmail recipe, that's what I would do at least. Have it grep the body of the mail for pat.smith@example.com (very often the original To: address is present in the reply), and if matched have formail create an automated reply to the sender, and send that out.

      What to do with the original mail is up to GP. They can just let it continue to their inbox, put it in a separate folder (that's what I'd do at least in the beginning - to make sure it works fine), drop it in the spam folder, or no local delivery - effectively deleting the original - which is what I would do after making sure it all works as planned.

  32. gmail issues by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    Not sure if they've addressed this situation, but Gmail has/had a problem with the dot between first.last@gmail.com. It is actually ignored. john.shopkin@gmail.com, johnshopkins@gmail.com, and johns.hopkins@gmail.com would all route to the same address. I've gotten a couple that were addressed to someone else, and the position of the dot was one space off. Completely different last name.

    1. Re:gmail issues by petefine · · Score: 1

      This is not a problem, it's a feature. both addresses are yours. I like it since it helps avoid misdirected emails if someone accidentally adds a . in my address. http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=10313#

    2. Re:gmail issues by choko · · Score: 1

      That isn't a problem or a bug, gmail was designed that way. I use that particular feature for filtering mail. I just put the dot in a different place depending on who I am providing the email address to. You can then set up filters based on the incoming mail address. I think its pretty handy.

    3. Re:gmail issues by Catnaps · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps you need to engage brain before typing.

    4. Re:gmail issues by sconeu · · Score: 1

      I believe Gmail also supports the "+" in the name (of course, your web-based $INFO_SELLING_BUSINESS may not), so I use

      myaccount+website[at gmail dot com]

      [domain obfuscated to protect the *real* "myaccount" holder]
      [disclaimer: I do *NOT* own myaccount at gmail dot com]

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    5. Re:gmail issues by TheBig1 · · Score: 1

      You can also use + after the name E.g. john.smith+amazon@gmail.com goes to john.smith's account. I use this (among other things like personal domain name, throwaway emails, etc) for reducing spam and telling where someone got my address from. If I get a spam to john.smith+amazon, I know it is Amazon who leaked my details. Cheers

    6. Re:gmail issues by asavage · · Score: 1

      Gmail ignores the dot. You can't sign up for another email address that is only different by number or locations of the dots. The dots only matter for logging in (or at least did in 2005).

    7. Re:gmail issues by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      I do this with my personal domain: [website or company name]@[mydomain.tld] - have done since I purchased the domain about 10 years ago.

      Sometimes when I give my email address to organizations in person (like when opening a bank account, I've been asked "how can you have an email address with our company name in it?". After explaining my reasons for doing this, those who understand think it's a good idea, those who don't just give me a blank look and go "oh, ok".

      But, as I operate a catch-all, I get tons of spam - not that I ever see it... it's all dictionary attacks, variations on email addresses used for junk messages or actual spam received after some company's email database was compromised.

      All I have to do is remember to update my email filters when I sign up for new stuff so that legit messages don't get marked as spam - the result of which is that my email filters tend to be pretty good at sorting messages in to separate IMAP folders - if it lands in my actual inbox, it's probably safe to read.

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
  33. the easiest thing to do in the long run by amn108 · · Score: 1

    Change your email address, my verbose friend :)

    1. Re:the easiest thing to do in the long run by nitehawk214 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why should he have to change his address? They are the ones that suck.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    2. Re:the easiest thing to do in the long run by amn108 · · Score: 1

      Because it's cheaper than arguing with idiots.

    3. Re:the easiest thing to do in the long run by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Same reason you have to lock your doors or carry an umbrella. Random actors don't care that you think they suck.

      If you want to be a target, go right ahead. If you don't, then stop acting like one.

  34. Also a problem with recycled addresses by HikingStick · · Score: 1

    I signed up for an address with one of the free providers a few years ago. As soon as I signed in the first time, I ended up receiving multiple messages from the former owner of the account. I've managed to get rid of all of the unwanted messages except for one--from a major university that keeps sending me crime and safety notifications. They have no contact information published in the email message, and attempts to get to a responsible person through the switchboard have been useless.

    If it's that much trouble for you, either filter out the offending messages (based on senders/subjects), or switch email addresses.

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
    1. Re:Also a problem with recycled addresses by qubezz · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of a story. There was a little startup that was trying to start a dialup/webmail thing a dozen years ago, they were handing around business cards to computer professionals for a free year signup with an auth code printed on them. They seemed pretty inept. When I went to sign up for my free account, I was able to sign up as root@crappy-startup.net. Resetting my email account reset their root password.

  35. Re:This is Why I Stoped Participating on Slashdot by space_jake · · Score: 1

    Aren't you participating by commenting on this topic?

  36. Have fun... by wmbetts · · Score: 5, Funny

    I get this one guys mail all the time. I've manage to sign him up for bbqs and all kinds of fun stuff. If I remember right I even told them my "daughter" wasn't allow to go on some field trip.

    First Email "
    Dear Bentley Families,

    You are receiving this email because we still have not received a gift or pledge from your family towards the Annual Fund.* While we understand that this has been a particularly challenging economic time for many of our community members we hope that you will still consider a gift or a pledge to the Annual Fund. In an effort to keep tuition as affordable as possible, Bentley, as other Independent Schools, sets a tuition level below our annual operating costs. The difference, or gap, between tuition and the price of a Bentley education is covered by Annual Fund dollars raised. This year the gap is $1,500 per student. While we do not expect every family to give at this level we do expect each family to participate to the best of their abilities. Every dollar donated will be used this fiscal year towards the benefit of your children.

    You may make an easy no-fee gift by credit card by clicking on the GIVE button on the right side of our home page: www.bentleyschool.net . You may also mail in a check or make a donation of stock. No gift is too small. Every single gift counts. We receive gifts from $1 - $40,000. Please join us in supporting Bentley to provide the very best education possible for our students.

    Avoid a call- make your gift or pledge today.

    Many thanks sincerely, "

    My reply"
    To Whom It May Concern:

    I would love to be able to help with your fund raiser, unfortunately due to the current economic situation I will be unable to help with your fund raiser. I'm doing everything I can just to ensure my daughter has a proper eduction. This includes a list of things we've had to cut from out normal lives. Two of the major things we've had to cut out is electricity and food. While we do have some food, we have no electricity in the conventional sense. I have to power my computer using a battery being recharged from stolen lemons (my neighbor has a tree). Is there any way you could maybe have a fund raiser or pass around a donation plate to help me and my family?

    Humbly Yours,"

    This goes on back and forth for a while with his daughters school.

    --
    "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me". - stolen from Dan C alt.os.linux.slackware
    1. Re:Have fun... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Are you David Thorne?

    2. Re:Have fun... by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      I would love to read some of that back and forth, good sir.

    3. Re:Have fun... by dangro · · Score: 1

      I second this.

  37. Same thing with snail mail by MBGMorden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have the same thing happen with snail mail - mostly bill collectors. Apparently they just LOVE trying to guess at addresses and track people down. There is another person with my first and last name (different middle) born in the same state as me on the same day (I found all this out while sorting out similar problems I was having with his crap showing up on my driving record).

    At least every 3 weeks I get a new collection notice from some company trying to get money from him. I call them up and they always act as if I'm trying to cheat them or something. One collection agency actually tried to convince me it would be better to just pay the guys bill anyways. Thing is, since he's SSN is different none of them ever make it to my credit report, so if they don't take my word for it I don't care too much.

    Did have an interesting traffic stop once though. I didn't know why it was taking so long until the cop came back asking whether or not I had any narcotics charges on my record. After that processed for a second and realizing he wasn't just messing with me we got it cleared up. He was close to calling for backup as my "evil twin" (as I've come to refer to him :)) was supposed to be incarcerated at that time.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    1. Re:Same thing with snail mail by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      There is another person with my first and last name (different middle) born in the same state as me on the same day

      Just the name is all it takes. I've been getting phone calls from a bank for over a year looking for a guy with the same first & last name who's delinquent on a mortgage. They go something like this:

      Mr. x?
      Yes.
      This is Mongo Bank. May I have the last four digits of your SSN?
      No.
      Would you like me to give you a phone number to call back?
      Why?
      So you can get the information I have for you.
      What information?
      I can't tell you that.
      So how do I know I want to talk to you?
      Ummm...

      The conversation goes in various directions from there, but sooner or later they blurt out private information about their target. I now know his full name, DOB, occupation, address, and how long it's been since he's made a mortgage payment...

      rj

    2. Re:Same thing with snail mail by lamber45 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't even have to be full name. My mother-in-law gets calls from bill collectors from time to time looking for a man with the same last name, same first initial. When my wife or I would answer the phone we just said we knew no such person; no idea if there's just one such person or more than one.

    3. Re:Same thing with snail mail by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      Not quite the same. I got a Nintendo Wii delivered to my doorstep from Target. Called them, they wouldn't take it back. Tried to contact the sender - no response. I waited a few months, then fired it up - enjoying it ever since. The whole package would have cost about $400 at retail.

      Way OT, but you reminded me of something similar that happened to us. We bought a new Xbox360 from a box store, brought it home and fired it up only to find a game disk already in the drive (one of the Fallouts, I believe). Box was (as far as we could tell) factory sealed, everything was wrapped and packaged up tight.

      We brought the game back to the store, to see if the store was missing a copy (and ask if our machine was an open box purchase or something). No game missing, no open box, just a weird fluke. Forgetful random unit testers at the factory? *shrug*

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    4. Re:Same thing with snail mail by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Probably just a refurb that they repacked and sold as new. Happens all the time.

    5. Re:Same thing with snail mail by blair1q · · Score: 1

      You do of course know this gives you a license to steal.

    6. Re:Same thing with snail mail by Quirkz · · Score: 1
      I've had trouble with snail mail in a couple of different ways.

      1. Not a confused name, but the previous occupants of our house have done a very poor job with getting things forwarded. I've lived there for 3 years, and we still get stuff for the previous owners. Important things, like replacement credit cards, collection notices, and tax notices.We have tried repeatedly to get the post office to forward those materials, but it keeps coming back to us. After getting the same credit card thing four times in a row over the course of two weeks, I gave up and just threw it away. No amount of marking up the letter to any extent seemed to let the post office realize re-delivering it to our house wasn't going to get it to the recipient.

      2. I have a very uncommon name, but someone opened an Ebay account using that name years ago. It may have been a coincidence, may have been fraud/identity theft, I'm not really sure. They made one transaction and skipped out on the bill, and I've had a few collection companies contact me (I'm the only guy in the state with that name, after all) trying to collect. It's a different company each time, so even though I'll convince one I'm not the right guy, the next starts over with me again.

    7. Re:Same thing with snail mail by BattleApple · · Score: 1

      I had a weird court experience years ago.. The cops had set up a roadblock to catch people with expired inspection stickers, and I got a ticket. I went to traffic court, they called my name, but the info the judge had about my car/registration was incorrect. He gave me some funny looks, then said "oh.. ok" after going through the stack of tickets on his desk. The clerk ended up telling me what happened - Someone else with the same name as me was supposed to be in court that day, but didn't show up. My name isn't all that common either. I searched the whitepages online, and there was only one other person with my name in the town I went to court in.

    8. Re:Same thing with snail mail by gknoy · · Score: 1

      It's a different company each time, so even though I'll convince one I'm not the right guy, the next starts over with me again.

      I wonder if any collection agencies re-form under a new company in order to be able to do this and get more people to take the "easy way" out of paying someone else's bill.

    9. Re:Same thing with snail mail by IICV · · Score: 1

      Did have an interesting traffic stop once though. I didn't know why it was taking so long until the cop came back asking whether or not I had any narcotics charges on my record. After that processed for a second and realizing he wasn't just messing with me we got it cleared up. He was close to calling for backup as my "evil twin" (as I've come to refer to him :)) was supposed to be incarcerated at that time.

      You know, he's probably evil because most of the shit he does gets half-blamed on you. I mean, if you could pull things that get most people in trouble but for some reason nothing bad ever happens to you, wouldn't you do it sometimes?

    10. Re:Same thing with snail mail by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      Probably just a refurb that they repacked and sold as new. Happens all the time.

      Yeah, could be. Well, it's working fine for us so far! Although to this day I still haven't played that Fallout game, it just doesn't look like my cup of tea...I kinda wish it had been a copy of DragonAge or something instead ;)

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    11. Re:Same thing with snail mail by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I've wondered that myself, but the company name, address, and phone numbers were all different enough in this case it didn't trip any real suspicions. It'd be one thing if they were both in the same city, but I find it unlikely a company would move across the country just to spam innocents a second time. Though if they had a sister company and shared contacts .... best not give them any ideas.

    12. Re:Same thing with snail mail by HiThere · · Score: 1

      My wife shares a name with a guy who ran up hospital bills, and then carelessly dropped dead. She's spent MONTHS trying to clear things up. Every time she clears it up with one group, they sell the account to someone else, who then starts the procedure all over.

      The internet isn't involved. They didn't live in the same city. They've never lived in the same zip code. The phone numbers aren't the same. They don't have my wife's date of birth. But we still keep getting calls.

      Personally, I think it's an intentional scam. They know the data's bad, so rather than take a loss they sell it to someone else, who then trys again, with the company, if possibly not the individual agent, knowing that it's a debt not owed by the person they're trying to collect from.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    13. Re:Same thing with snail mail by tengu1sd · · Score: 1

      Same situation, except it's from a Bunch of A**hats calling about a VISA card bill. Never heard of this guy, but I know his name, balance, last payment and previous address. I called the Privacy Compliance Office of BoA without resolving the calls. Since they managed assign my cell phone to Joe Deadbeat this was a a little annoying. Eventually, I filed a complaint with State Attorney General, Jerry Brown at the time, and the calls did stop.

      I also got a letter on lawyer's letterhead denying that they ever called me, that personal information had been given out on phone calls which never happened, and that no record of inappropriate contact information existed.

    14. Re:Same thing with snail mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have found the quickest way to sort out misdirected snail mail from banks etc, is to tape a brick to the reply paid envelope & put it in the mail box with a polite not advising that every time they send you a letter for someone else the brick will get bigger. Works a treat.

    15. Re:Same thing with snail mail by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      You may in this case very well be in your right.

      It is illegal to send someone goods s/he didn't order, and then after delivery of the parcel and you accepting it to demand payment for it.

      Though whether sender is in the right do demand back their parcel, assuming it's indeed addressed to you at that address, I really don't know.

    16. Re:Same thing with snail mail by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      Charlie? How are you man! - what ever happened with you and that TV show you were on?

    17. Re:Same thing with snail mail by Kakari · · Score: 1

      Assuming you're in the States, send a polite but firm letter explaining the issue and ask that they no longer contact you and that if they contact you again you will forward correspondence to your state's AG and the collection company's state's AG.

      Heck, if it's already such an issue, it might be worth talking to your state's AG - they may be able to work to prevent the debt from being sold again.

  38. I just mark them as spam by andymadigan · · Score: 4, Informative

    I typically just mark misdirected messages as spam. I didn't request the message (so it's unsolicited), and it's the sender's duty to get the address correct, I'm certainly not going to put time or thought into fixing it.

    I once got an e-mail from Dell that gave me a login to someone else's account, including their name, address and various other bits of information. I called them to fix that. I also got an e-mail from classmates thanking me for opening a new account, I closed the account.

    Bottom line - if someone's signing up for a service, they better get the address correct, and online services should ALWAYS verify the address (by sending a message to it that contains a link) BEFORE finishing account creation.

    --
    The right to protest the State is more sacred than the State.
    1. Re:I just mark them as spam by houghi · · Score: 1

      I typically just mark misdirected messages as spam

      Makes me think about those comapny signatures with some legal blabla in it telling me what to do if mail is send to me by accident. Two things:
      1) I did not agree with that signature, so sod off.
      2) I looked at the header and it clearly shows that the mail was intended for me each and every time. Otherwise I would not get it.

      Yeah, the company I work for also has them. When I asked legal why, they pointed to IT as it is their responsibility. They pointed to legal. Unfortunately they were not in the same room when I asked.

      Would have been fun to see how IT told Legal to their job and Legal telling IT how to do theirs. The result would have been an even larger signature.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:I just mark them as spam by poor_boi · · Score: 1

      Marking otherwise legitimate emails as spam has a potential downside: if your spam blocker is stochastic / bayesian / learning, you will be teaching it that legitimate email patterns are "spamlike." I prefer to just blacklist the sender's address in types of cases.

    3. Re:I just mark them as spam by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      I typically just mark misdirected messages as spam

      Makes me think about those comapny signatures with some legal blabla in it telling me what to do if mail is send to me by accident.

      And that makes me think about the oatmeal.

      I'm constantly tempted to replace our legalese sig with that Disclosure from 'DoucheSpeak' (about halfway down the comic). That way we'd find out if people are actually reading those useless things...

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    4. Re:I just mark them as spam by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      I also got an e-mail from classmates thanking me for opening a new account, I closed the account.

      Hah! I have a pretty uncommon name, but I guess there's a kid in PA who shares it. His sister opened a Facebook account for him and gave my email address. After a few email exchanges where I tried to explain what happened and she ended up angry that I "hacked his account", I ended up setting its password to something 32 letters long and cryptographically random, then closing it.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    5. Re:I just mark them as spam by gknoy · · Score: 1

      If you could reset the password and log in, it would have been more polite (if perhaps less viscerally satisfying) to change the password to "IHeartBees", and then set the e-mail address to the sister's account? If you knew his real e-mail address, you could set it to that. You could also correspond on Facebook directly with him as a user and say, "Your sister set up the Facebook account wrong - here's how you fix it".

      It's often EASIER to be a jerk, but ... why?

    6. Re:I just mark them as spam by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Sigh. I just knew that if I didn't transcribe the entire event, someone would come to the worst possible (completely incorrect) interpretation. I didn't take detailed notes at the time, but the gist of it was this:

      Sister set up an account with email address.

      Once I figured out what happened - after getting over someone else sharing my very uncommon name - I posted something to the effect of "this account was set up incorrectly. Please have the owner write to me at [...] and I'll help him transfer the account to his own email address."

      Sis promptly writes and asks why I'm hacking her brother's account.

      I write back, still in a happy mood, and try to explain what happened and how we could straighten it out.

      She logs into the Facebook account and changes the password, then starts complaining about hackers and friending a bunch of people for her brother. I'm seeing all of this in my email. I write to sis (because I still don't have the brother's email address) and ask her to please change its email address. She writes back angrily.

      I reset the password - since it's still tied to my email - and disable the account so that it will be deleted and garbage collected within a few weeks.

      A month or so later, I search for the guy and see that he has a new Facebook account with the same friends as when it was aimed at my email. It all worked out well in the end.

      Again, I didn't make transcripts so I can't tell you exactly how it went down or exactly what was said, but I acted in good faith and tried to help the kid every step of the way. I was open and friendly, even when I was being accused of hacking his account. I didn't want to cause problems for anyone; I just wanted a stream of Facebook updates to stop flooding my account.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    7. Re:I just mark them as spam by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 1

      I typically just mark misdirected messages as spam.

      That's not the best solution, the spam filter in mail clients develops a strong bias against mail you actively mark as spam. While these mails are not for you, they *are* legitimate, giving your mail client a bias against legitimate mail. You might find that mail you want to receive goes straight to the junk folder.

      Just delete them, or if it happens frequently make a folder named notforme or something to which you filter these mails.

      --
      Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
    8. Re:I just mark them as spam by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 1

      Makes me think about those comapny signatures with some legal blabla in it telling me what to do if mail is send to me by accident.

      I once received a mail with such a footer intended for some poor smuck who hadn't paid several of his bills, the email included some embarrassingly personal information. I replied that they'd got the wrong person. Someone in legal obviously got cold feet, because I received a reply with what I would characterise as legal abuse, demanding that I take certain actions to remedy their mistake and confirm to them that I had done so.

      I just ignored this, but after several increasingly insistent follow-ups from them I replied that I certainly had no interest in their business with this character, but if they didn't stop harassing me I would happily notify the relevant authorities about their sloppy handling of sensitive information (we have pretty potent privacy laws where I live). I got an "apology" from their CEO with a veiled threat about what they would do if I took further steps... I was tempted, but let it lie and moved on.

      --
      Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
  39. Same problem with snail mail by scharkalvin · · Score: 2

    After buying a new house we started getting snail mail addressed to the former owners. Most of it was junk which just get put in the recycle bin. Some were bills which we marked as 'return to sender' and handed back to the post deliver person. Eventually, a collection agent rang our bell to serve a legal notice, we told them to take a hike as the person they were looking for is now in parts unknown. That stopped the bills from coming.

    1. Re:Same problem with snail mail by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      Actually that was what we did "Delivery Refused: no such person at this address, return to sender"

  40. make a blog + get rich! by schlachter · · Score: 1

    1. Take all these emails and post them your very own blog!
    2. Advertise on your blog!
    3. ....
    4. Get rich.

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
  41. Make work the idiots work by sjwest · · Score: 1

    If they buy stuff like air tickets reply that you did not order then cancel the order. That will annoy somebody so that they only do it once. airlines are happy to oblige.

    I still get some idiot on comcast who has a the wrong domain names in there m$ email client setup and tries to access our email servers now and again. Dont expect change.

    I changed the addressing format as well however short fred@fredsmith.tld accounts are out of the question, the spammers might be reduced but those addresses still are for sale never to be removed.

    1. Re:Make work the idiots work by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      If they buy stuff like air tickets reply that you did not order then cancel the order. That will annoy somebody so that they only do it once. airlines are happy to oblige.

      If it was round-trip, it'd be more fun to only cancel the return leg.

      I still get some idiot on comcast who has a the wrong domain names in there m$ email client setup and tries to access our email servers now and again. Dont expect change.

      Then again, if you can't work the English language any better than they can work their email client, you probably shouldn't be complaining.

  42. Change your email by Moof123 · · Score: 1

    Delete it, and create a more unique email for yourself. John.DoeZIPCODE@gmail.com for example Of course that likely means that down the road you'll be stuck wondering who is getting mail meant for you.

  43. happens even to uncommon names by John_Sauter · · Score: 1

    My name isn't all that common, but even so this has happened to me. I first learned about a "john Sauter" in southern California who is some kind of medical doctor when he traveled to a conference and I got notices from his hotel. I told them that they had the wrong e-mail address, and thought no more about it. However, I kept getting other messages obviously intended for him. When there was a reply address available I would politely tell the sender that I am a computer programmer in New Hampshire, not a medical professional in southern California.

    It got a little scary, though, when he sold his practice, and a lawyer sent me the legal paperwork. I don't know what kind of trouble you can get into by receiving legal papers intended for someone else—it would be easy to run afoul of the insider trading rules in the case of a public company, or HIPPA rules for medical information.

    1. Re:happens even to uncommon names by TheBig1 · · Score: 1

      I don't know what kind of trouble you can get into by receiving legal papers intended for someone else—it would be easy to run afoul of the insider trading rules in the case of a public company, or HIPPA rules for medical information.

      I think you just found the missing link!

      1. 1. Send legal documents to wrong people
      2. 2. Sue them for opening said documents
      3. 3. Profit!

      Cheers

    2. Re:happens even to uncommon names by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      You're not trading the company, and you're not interested in receiving medical information. If you sit quiet until they realize this went somewhere and they didn't get a 503, then come looking for you, they will want to know why you sat quiet receiving information.

    3. Re:happens even to uncommon names by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      HIPPA laws are against *disclosing* information, not receiving it, so you shouldn't have had anything to worry about there. If your doctor tells you the name of another patient, they're the one who gets in trouble, not you.

    4. Re:happens even to uncommon names by John_Sauter · · Score: 1

      HIPPA laws are against *disclosing* information, not receiving it, so you shouldn't have had anything to worry about there. If your doctor tells you the name of another patient, they're the one who gets in trouble, not you.

      So the lesson, then, is to confirm that the intended recipient is at the other end of an e-mail address you've been given if you intend to send any sensitive information. I suppose the easiest way to confirm is to send an inquiry e-mail and ask for a response. If you don't get one, or if the response says "no, I'm not him", then discard the e-mail address.

    5. Re:happens even to uncommon names by mr1911 · · Score: 1

      I don't know what kind of trouble you can get into by receiving legal papers intended for someone else

      None. It was addressed to your name, delivered to you. You can't know it isn't for you until you read it.

      If it is so important that you shouldn't be reading it, they should have taken care to address it properly.

      You have no duty to report it back to the sender, although doing so is polite. You have no duty to delete it, although doing so would bolster your defense for any wrongful whatever suit may be filed by the sender in an attempt to cover their own failure.

      HIPPA doesn't apply unless you are a medical professional sharing a patient's information. Reading something sent to you does not put you in jeopardy. You would have to investigate to have any reasonable belief to believe you received valid information about a real person.

      Insider trading? What if a Nigerian prince had a hot stock tip for you? Any unsolicited information you receive is more likely a scam than misdirected corporate information that would make you rich.

      The only way to incur any liability would be to further distribute or act on any information if you had any reason to believe it was legitimate, sensitive information. Simply reading it before deleting it does not meet that bar.

      --
      This post comes with a double-your-money-back guarantee!
      Any offense taken to this post is at your sole discretion.
  44. I've been getting someones tax returns for years.. by Ironhandx · · Score: 1

    About 3 years ago I started getting emails regarding tax returns from Intuit. All for a guy by the same name except he's from Georgia, USA.

    I've tried contacting them, to no avail. Intuit says they can't send him anything due to privacy etc, meanwhile I'm getting all of his details in an email.

    Since I had his address and everything I even tried calling the guy, but I guess his number is unlisted or something, couldn't find him. Figured that tax return emails were kind of important.

  45. "It isn't spam, but it isn't my meat." by tokul · · Score: 1

    It is spam. You never asked them to send those emails to you. If email sender does not provide good return address or lies with "we got your address from public sources and you can unsubscribe", when your address is not public, you are free to report them to spamcop.

  46. Gmail Canned Responses by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 2

    I have the Canned Responses set up from Google Labs that has a short, sweet, "Hi, you got the wrong [John Doe]. Don't bother apologizing/replying, I know it was a typo. Just update your addressbook, please."

    I just do a quick reply to all with that canned response, and then I assume I've done my due diligence regarding the error. If nobody gets the reply, that's not my problem. If I still get more misdirected mail from that source, I just trash it.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    1. Re:Gmail Canned Responses by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      I had that problem with a local school (odd that a student's parent had the same name as mine). I sent several polite emails tongue school explaining there error when I got a reply that stated "the address was right, xxx.yyy at gmail is different from xxxyyy at gmail( it isn't as gmail ignores dots), and I need to change my email, I said FU. And dump all school mail to junk. I figured once a " your kids not in class" email got missed and a parent was pissed they'd fix the errors. I did stop getting them so I guess it works. Usually my first oops this is not the one you want email usually get a thanks reply, but som dholes can't seem to figure it. Not my problem.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    2. Re:Gmail Canned Responses by SockPuppetOfTheWeek · · Score: 1

      I sent several polite emails tongue school explaining there error when I got a reply that stated "the address was right, xxx.yyy at gmail is different from xxxyyy at gmail( it isn't as gmail ignores dots)

      I'd add "xxx.yyy@gmail.com" as an alternate e-mail address and then reply from it saying "no it isn't".

      Also - how the heck do you get "tongue" there? Auto-correct?

    3. Re:Gmail Canned Responses by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      I sent several polite emails tongue school explaining there error when I got a reply that stated "the address was right, xxx.yyy at gmail is different from xxxyyy at gmail( it isn't as gmail ignores dots)

      I'd add "xxx.yyy@gmail.com" as an alternate e-mail address and then reply from it saying "no it isn't".

      Also - how the heck do you get "tongue" there? Auto-correct?

      I could, but quite frankly it's to much of hassle and all I'd do is continue to argue with an idiot. Most people respond with a nice sorry about that or thanks I'll fix it. For some reason the administrator at the school couldn't take the time to simply verify the address (he insisted the person was getting his emails at my gmail address) and became petulant when I tried to explain why he wasn't. The best was when some attorney started emailing me stuff for a case he was working on. The risk is (for those that remember the old risks-digest) making public information you truly want to keep private; compounded by the ease which with most email programs add outgoing addresses.

      Yea, the iPhone's autocorrect gets funny sometimes, I generally catch it but sometimes...

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  47. Used to be an issue, but not so much today by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Back before rising spam levels made this unworkable, I used to have a catchall address for my domains. One of my domains in .com has the same name as a church school in ".co.uk". At the beginning of each term, I'd get some messages addressed to students who hadn't figured out the address yet, and I'd send back a canned reply.

    One day I got a message titled "I am going to kill you tonight". This was a bit worrisome. Especially since my site predicted which dot-coms were going to go bust, based on their financials, and I routinely got threats. But those threats were usually from corporate lawyers and CFOs, and threatened litigation. After reading the message, though, it was clear it was aimed at some kid at the school.

    This was shortly after Columbine, and it said tonight", so I felt I had to do something. I was able to get hold of someone at the school by phone, and they woke up the headmistress (8 hour time difference) and put her on the line. I read her the text of the message, and she immediately knew who it was. She told me it was a 12 year old kid, and the matter would be taken care of.

    It's a good thing it was a UK school. In the US, a SWAT team probably would have been sent in.

  48. Re:This is Why I Stoped Participating on Slashdot by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

    Many years ago with a 6 digits ID?

    ;-)

    --
    "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
  49. If you care, do something about it. by Essequemodeia · · Score: 1

    Sure, you could just delete them or filter them and leave it be. But if you want to do something nice for a stranger (but a stranger who shares your name, which kinda puts you in a special club), why not perpetrate some special trickery in order to determine the person to whom the emails are intended so you may contact them to inform you're receiving mail intended for them. It's really a shame that you can't simply mark emails with "return to sender, addressee not known." It's easy to not care. I'm not suggesting making this your life's effort, but doing something nice for someone you don't know is always a good way to please the cosmos.

    1. Re:If you care, do something about it. by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Many e-mail applications (including, for example Apple Mail) have a "Bounce" command that does exactly that.

  50. Identity Theft? by DERoss · · Score: 1

    If I started receiving such E-mail messages from companies, the first thing I would do would be to check my credit reports to make sure I am not a victim of identity theft. If the reports are clear, I would trash the messages.

    However, it the messages continue to be sent by the same company, I would do some on-line research and determine the postal address of the company's headquarters and the name of the company's CEO. I would mail a postal letter to the CEO with a printout of the message -- with all headers -- demanding the company stop annoying me. I would clearly point out that the messages are going to the wrong E-mail address. Also, if the message was about a past-due bill that someone else owes, my letter would suggest that I might sue for harassment.

    1. Re:Identity Theft? by black+soap · · Score: 1

      You think the CEO of PayPal gives a shit that his company is sending me email intended for some seller in another country?

    2. Re:Identity Theft? by DERoss · · Score: 1

      If the E-mail is about non-delivery of a purchase or anything else that might require PayPal to refund money, I think some attention would be paid to my letter. After all, it's money honey.

  51. their stupidity by e3m4n · · Score: 1

    outside of an obvious case of someone trying your email to see if you are the person they are trying to reach (hey is this bob from phoenix college back in 1998? ) I would reply to every email as if you were a victim of identity theft. Its absolutely crap that you get legal guardian questions about someone elses kid. That means some asshole put your email instead of theres. Those sites arent in the habit of randomly guessing. Respond so that whatever you pick could be the worst possible result for the person who is using your email address instead of theirs.

  52. Try once, the f'em by EricWright · · Score: 1

    I have had my personal email address for quite some time (5-digit UID and it's the same email address with which I registered my /. account, so 1998?). About a year ago, I got a reply to an Emily Wright. Luckily, the original email had her correct address (same as mine, but with a digit). Apparently, she goofed on setting up the reply-to in her email client.

    Anyway, I forwarded her the email explaining the problem and giving pointers on how to fix the problem. Well, Emily replied and accused me of hacking her email account and flat out insisted that she owned my email address and had been using it for the past two years (or about a decade less than I've had the account).

    My attitude went from "helpful technology capable guy" to "fuck you, you arrogant bitch". Now, anything addressed to Emily goes straight to the trash can, no matter how important it appears to be.

    1. Re:Try once, the f'em by EricWright · · Score: 1

      NWA, bitchez!

  53. ha by Nyall · · Score: 1

    I have my last name registered as a domain so I could have a first_name@last_name.org email address. But I occasionally get news mails that address me as Ralph, my dads name, from the Missouri state university, where my dad went. I also get environmental political action emails addressed to him.

    I've examined the links closely and none appear to be phishing attempts.

    I'm wondering if these institutions have bought supposed good email addresses from a company that came about them through some kind of "smart" interpolation algorithm.

    --
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification
    1. Re:ha by blair1q · · Score: 1

      If by "supposed good" you mean "bullshit but seemingly plausible", then probably. Especially if they paid by the address.

  54. Try to correct, then Report Spam by Control-Z · · Score: 1

    I've gotten all sorts of things to my Gmail account (firstinitialLastname@gmail.com). Navy job interview details, hotel reservations, job quotes, renewals of UK commercial driver's licenses.

    I correct individuals, just a quick note to say "Sorry wrong e-mail address." Except some girl named Paige (same last name as me). I have been trying for 6 months to get her to stop sending me her stupid chain humor letters (she thinks she's e-mailing her dad), and she said she would several times. Today she got Reported as Spam to Gmail.

    For companies I if they don't make it easy to unsubscribe, I Report Spam. They should check e-mails before blindly accepting and mailing to them.

    1. Re:Try to correct, then Report Spam by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      Just report spam for anything that is not a prove this is your email address confirmation. Best practices for sending email is to confirm it before sending anything else. He is only getting emails from broken systems that should be punished otherwise they will never be fixed.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
  55. Just delete the e-mail by rbphilip · · Score: 1

    It's not your problem if someone mis-addresses an email. Eventually, if you keep deleting them, the sender will figure it out.

  56. Mail filter. by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    Just make a mail filter that checks if there is a no-reply and junk the mail. That will work as long as you don't have any subscriptions running, but on the other hand you can filter them first so that they aren't deleted.

    However - every company should have a postmaster account so send any complaints to that account. The postmaster account is required by a RFC. And many companies do have a contact page or contact email addresses. Some even have abuse@... in which case you can use that too.

    If they request you to call a certain number then don't. Place a collect call to them instead or write them a snail mail letter. Polite snail mail may be a lot more effective.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  57. Re:This is Why I Stoped Participating on Slashdot by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    ... Because Mrs. Manners will probably give him stupid advice, and even Lifehacker would probably give stupid and marginally dangerous advice.

    I think he's writing to Slashdot because he wants a technical solution that still lets him maintain some modicum of good karma (Slashdot being one of the few sites that has a concept of karma).

  58. Re:Dumbass by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    Are you really this stupid? Why is it your problem and what is wrong with deleting them ... Herp derp my email duh.

    I think he's simply trying to be a decent person. Agreed, it's not his problem, but he's not stupid to want to help others. A better question would be, "what's wrong with you?" Weren't you ever taught the Golden Rule? If your friend or relative screwed up, wouldn't you like it if someone, particularly a stranger, helped them out - for free.

    For example, I found a guy's wallet on the side of the road one evening while I was walking. There was no money or credit cards - perhaps he was robbed - but it did contain his Social Security card (I know, really stupid to carry that) and a Navy ID with ship name. I checked online and found that the ship had recently left port, but found an address for the ship ombudsman, so I mailed the guys wallet there. Ya, his misfortune wasn't my problem, but helping him out won't hurt my karma...

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  59. URL or it didn't happen! by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    Share and let us enjoy the conversation.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:URL or it didn't happen! by gknoy · · Score: 1

      With that level of information about someone, you ought to be able to contact the person and say, "hey so -- you gave your school the wrong mail address", right?

    2. Re:URL or it didn't happen! by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      But where's the fun in that?

  60. Goatse by JShadow21 · · Score: 1

    I reply with goatse

  61. Get Creative by kiehlster · · Score: 1

    You could...

    Start collecting them. Learn about the interests of those other John Smiths of the world. Then call them up someday or have a visit with then and amaze them with your psychic abilities.

    Sell them to Wikileaks as flack against corporations. Might turn into something.

    Print them out and mail them to their original recipients. They'll get real peeved to think their paperless preferences are broken.

    Cancel the services and say someone fraudulently signed up for something using your information. That's bound to turn their heads.

  62. email is confidential by Chris+Grundy · · Score: 1

    So you can use that as an excuse to delete it as soon as you realize it is not intended for you and not feel bad about it. Not that I think confidentiality laws could get you in any trouble, it's just what I tell my self to not feel guilty about immediately deleting and filtering this kind of mails that I also get in my also rather mistakable gmail address

  63. My favorite misdirected email by Time_Ngler · · Score: 1

    From Harvard

    Dear Emily,

    Thank you for your application to the Management Program. Unfortunately,
    you have not met the admission requirements. Your grade point average of
    3.42 is slightly above the 3.33 required. You did not earn the required
    grade in ECON 1010. As a result, your application has been made
    ineligible. You may take the alternate course ECON 1600. You have two
    attempts to pass the required economic preadmission course. Failing to
    obtain a B on the second attempt will permanently bar you from admission
    to our ALM in Management Program.

      If you decide to continue your studies with us it will not be easy.You
    are required to maintain your cumulative GPA at 3.33 or higher. It is
    important to note that any grade below B+ will push you even further away
    from degree program admission. Please by mindful that all program grades
    count toward your cumulative GPA, including required repeat courses.

    Earning your graduate degree and moving ahead with your professional plans
    is of paramount importance. Our program may be an obstacle to this goal.
    Your valuable time and money might be better spent at another institution.
    You may even be eligible to transfer credits earned and begin again with a
    new GPA.

    We hope you accept this message in the spirit that it was intended, to
    support your degree completion plans. If you have questions regarding this
    information, you may call our office at **********.

    Best wishes for future academic success.

    Regards,
    Donna *****

    What asshats.. I told them the email was misdirected and didn't get a response either.

    1. Re:My favorite misdirected email by pclminion · · Score: 1

      "Thank you for your application to the Management Program. Unfortunately, you have not met the admission requirements. Your grade point average of 3.42 is slightly above the 3.33 required."

      Seriously? To get into Harvard Management you have to have a GPA less than 3.33? That explains a lot.

  64. Third party supplied email by pitonyak · · Score: 1

    It is common for me to receive email from a company when I have never supplied an email address to them. As an example, I had my car serviced at an out of state car dealer while visiting family. I began receiving email from them to an old email address that I had not actively used in years. The same for my lawn service company. My point is that it is entirely possible that the email address is paid for by the company in question and the provided email has not been properly verified by the company the provides the message. I contacted these companies and asked how they obtained my email address and the usual response is that they have no idea at all. My general experience is that the lower level people have no idea about how this is done, don't really care, and have no ability to fix the problem. I was receiving daily phone calls from a collection agency that was convinced that my phone number belonged to a woman I never heard of. Every time that they called they said that they would fix the problem and they would not call back. After about a month my wife was overly stressed (because of the timing of the call) so when I chatted with them next I mentioned that if they called again I would contact the police. The caller told me that not even the police could stop them from calling me. So...... I chatted with the VP of the bank. Our next call was from a a rather high level manager that left his direct number and he asked very politely that he be informed immediately if we received another call and that we please do not bother the VP again. OK, so, lesson learned. If no link or general method for getting off the list is available, work your way to the top and ask why you are receiving personal information (such as billing information) for one of their customers; if you have time to kill or it really annoys you. If they blow you off, well, my guess is that there are privacy rules that they just violated and you can likely pursue that if you desire.

    1. Re:Third party supplied email by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      After the second call you should have thrown the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act at them. All those extra calls would have been worth tens of thousands of dollars.

  65. Gmail pattern-matching by frinkster · · Score: 1

    I also have a firstname.lastname@gmail.com account and frequently get email that is neither intended for me nor sent to me. I sometimes look at the email headers and many times my email address is nowhere to be found. It appears that if Gmail receives an email for a non-existent account it simply routes it to whatever account it can find that is most similar. And I believe that firstname.lastname@gmail.com accounts get ranked highest because they have no numerical permutation.

    1. Re:Gmail pattern-matching by hymie! · · Score: 1

      You've never heard of BCC ?

    2. Re:Gmail pattern-matching by heypete · · Score: 1

      Doubtful. They probably just had your address as a BCC.

  66. Not always a Problem! by rodarson2k · · Score: 1

    There are TWO urologists who have the same surname as me at the university where i went to school. Somehow, I got the default "surname@school.edu" address instead of either of them, and I frequently got emails intended for them.

    It's much more fun to get unintended emails when they're about the problems some poor guy is having with his junk.

    "I know my follow-up is scheduled for next week, but my scrotum is painfully swollen and I can barely walk. Can you see me any earlier?"

    I was usually kind enough to let them know that they had the wrong address.

  67. I have the exact same problem; here's my approach by Michael+O-P · · Score: 1
    I'm friendly to the personal message, simply stating, "I am not Christina, please update your address book."

    If someone signs up for a website using my email, I immediately go there, reset their password, and change the email address to something like "abuse@yahoo.com."

    If a kid signs up for an account with me as their parent, I immediately revoke their account. I'd want someone to do that to my kids if they were trying to get around me.

    Any other accounts, I do what I can to alert the company, but for the most part they get labeled as spam. If the company did not take steps to verify the email address, then it is absolutely spam, and not my problem.

    I have a 3 character yahoo ID, and I get a ton of these. Unfortunately I was never able to make any impact on the person filing tax returns using my email address.

    --
    I'm Peggy.
  68. You think you've got it bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you think you've got it bad, you should see what my inbox looks like!

    -Sandy Claus

  69. Exact same problem here. by bircho · · Score: 1

    I got a surname@gmail.com address and EVERYDAY i receive at least one e-mail by mistake. People type xyz.surname@gmail.com as xyz,surname@gmail.com and there you go...

    I tried filter, warn people, flag as spam, but there's no sure way to catch it all. I at least try to have fun. So far i've got:
    - Pics from a married man to his male lover.
    - US$370 transfer from Paypal (i didn't take the money, by the way).
    - Dozens of resumes.
    - E-mail from a girl to his teacher who would do ANYTHING to don't fail his course.
    - Got my e-mail banned from Facebook because someone signed up with my email and messed up (Solved later).
    - Deleted 100+ e-mail accounts that used my email as secondary email for password recovery.

    Change your e-mail or live with it.

  70. Re:Dots are not processed for gmail accounts by robot256 · · Score: 1

    Holy shit, you're right. I inserted a dot in the middle of my gmail address and it went to my regular inbox.

    I'm hoping their account creation filter knows this, and doesn't let someone create joe.smith if joesmith already exists.

  71. Seems to be a common problem by sleepdepzombie · · Score: 1

    I've had similar problems mostly due to people signing up for things using my email address. One was a guy signing up for Match and giving them my email address and another one was a guy signing up for a job site.

    The one on the job site was a guy with my same name across the country that I'd never met so I called him up (I had his resume which had my email on it as well) and helped him fix his profile.

    The Match one was a lot more irritating; those people are really spammy. I might have logged in and changed his response address to YouFail@DatingOnMatch.com since they sent me a password in the sign up e-mail. That individual has gotten a lot better about signing me up for things since.

    For other e-mail that looked like they might be important to people I've tried to contact the sender. Everything else just gets deleted.

  72. Worse Problem by Gotung · · Score: 1

    I have first initial + lastname @gmail.com and I have a bunch of people with the same name combo that use the address when they fill out forms, all the time. I ended up getting enough personal information on one of them that I knew his real name, where he grew up, his highschool, his date of birth, his current address, etc. Pretty much everything I could ever want it I wanted to do some ID theft.

    I tracked him down on facebook and sent him a message telling him all this. Since then I haven't gotten anymore of his emails, but other people are still doing it too.

    Do these people think the emails just go to oblivion? I mean they are giving my email address when they do shit like rent a UHaul so I get all of the information on that transaction in confirmation emails.

  73. You're being too helpful by jtara · · Score: 1

    You're being too helpful. The email system is broken, and has been broken since the start. The problem is that anybody can put any email address they want as the return or reply address, whether it belongs to them or not. There's no verification of identity or "ownership".

    It's not your job to fix this. So, delete it or put filters in place to do that automatically when possible.

    Only if it gets overwhelming you'll need to take some kind of action. I once had a situation with my live.net domain (now owned by Microsoft) where a spammer thought that live.net email addresses would look nifty on spam for "live girls" phone services. Enough outraged recipients emailed the return address that it created a problem not just for me but for my ISP, which got flooded for a day or so to the point of degraded service until they could put filters in place.

    I was able to track down the culprit with the help of a C|Net news story offering a monetary reward, a helpful hacker-type, and with the cooperation of the call center that provided service for the "live girls" line. Amazingly, the end result was not just the discontinuance of the spam, but two anonymous money orders in the mail (I think totaling $900) that was supposedly the disgorged profits of the spammer. The operator of the service claims he hired some guy to publicize the service, and had "no idea" he was doing so via spam. The call center gave the operator 24 hours to resolve the situation, threatening to disconnect the lines.

    Aside from that, there was once an ISP at live.com (pre-Microsoft), and many users mistakenly entered their email address as live.net instead. For a time I would helpfully email correspondents telling them that they were using the wrong return address. And too many people just didn't "get it" and got hostile. It got to be enough of a bother that I set-up an auto-reply. But the auto-reply just got me bounce messages more often than not compounding the problem. So, I wound up just dropping messages addressed to live.com addresses on the floor. Which is probably the best thing for you to do.

    1. Re:You're being too helpful by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      The email system is broken, and has been broken since the start. The problem is that anybody can put any email address they want as the return or reply address, whether it belongs to them or not. There's no verification of identity or "ownership".

      This is not a problem with "e-mail". You can replace "e-mail" with "physical mail" everywhere in your statement and it's still true. Before caller ID, the phone system had exactly the same problem (at least until some real crime was committed that rated a trace on a call).

      And, both of them still have the same "typo" issue as e-mail does, especially if you have to enter the "address" using a different system (e.g., phone number entered into a website or "account" card at a B&M business).

  74. Nah B by RL78 · · Score: 2

    "Is there any way to make emails to an improperly formatted gmail address bounce or do something else obvious? Is there a technical solution I am overlooking" No, because its porperly formatted, just improperly addressed. As for how to handle it, it's the email equivalent of a wrong number. I'll let you decide that.

  75. What did you expect?! by Geldon · · Score: 4, Funny

    With an email address like "firstname.lastname@gmail.com"! I mean, you might as well have the address "user@example.com"!

  76. Old program called mailwasher I think? by Sczi · · Score: 1

    My wife used a windows app called I think MailWasher many years ago. It would view the email still on the pop server and then somehow view the email (or maybe just headers? i forget) and selectively bounce them a few different ways. Seems like something like that could be useful. Doesn't seem like that sort of thing should even be possible, tho, and I suspect it generated "fake" bounce messages. Now with so many different mail servers with each one generating its own 550's, do any companies really thoroughly process their bounced emails, so would it even have any effect? It would be a great place to put filters, though. Google could just make a new rules interface or maybe easier would be to add bounce actions to the filters to prevent the email from even landing in your inbox. It sure would suck to accidentally black list something important with it.

  77. Forward on by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

    There are a couple I get to my gmail account. Some of the earlier ones I actually was able to reply to and ask them them to correct their contact list and have their intended contact send me a message so I could forward other mail for him. He's sent a few of my errant messages to me as well. We just have a single letter swapped in our addresses so it happens somewhat frequently - we even type or own addresses wrong sometimes.

    So, I'd say, get in touch with the intended recipients. Together you can make a plan of action and make sure that everyone is more careful with their addresses.

    Other than this goofy issue, I've had no problems using Gmail. It's a great service.

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  78. Happens To Me All The Time by SteveHeadroom · · Score: 1

    I also have a pretty simple, short GMail address and I'm always getting emails for people with a similar name to mine. For regular people, I reply back. For bulk company stuff, I just try to unsubscribe.

    In a few really annoying cases where I can't completely unsubscribe, I've reset people's password's, logged into their accounts and changed their email addresses. A couple times I changed their names to something like "Captain Dipshit".

  79. A second "anti-SPAM" act??? by sconeu · · Score: 1

    sort of like a second anti-SPAM act

    You realize that the CAN-SPAM Act was nothing of the sort. It was named CAN-SPAM because spammers CAN SPAM you with impunity.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:A second "anti-SPAM" act??? by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 1

      Perhaps; I was simply invoking it by analogy because it was another law having to do with email spam (albeit a different kind of email spam).

      --
      -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
  80. Don't take on someone else's problem by wirelessjb · · Score: 1

    Many commenters have said this already, I just wanted to add my vote. This applies to life as a whole, not just email - People will always try to pass on their problems to you. Don't accept the burden. Nothing good can come of it. You are not being nice and helpful, you are enabling their bad behavior. If an IRS agent sent me an email saying that I forgot a deduction, and would I mind if they just tacked it on to my return before sending out the refund check, I wouldn't bother spending all those hours checking my math next year.

  81. i thought i was the only one by nazsco · · Score: 1

    usually i get tons of subscription emails for games. i just mark as spam.

    One time i got a shipping confirmation for a webstore that does not have an email confirmation system. I just marked as spam.

    Later that store send an email about failing to try to deliver 3 times at the given address. Marked as spam.

    Once i started getting emails from some lady that was letting some guy with the same name use her apartment while she was out of town. Thankfully i saw those before my wife. ...or someone looking for empty apartments in the rich part of town to borrow stuff.

  82. Veterans adminsitration by sargon666777 · · Score: 1

    My name used to get emails all the time from the Veterans administration with medical records and all for a guy with the same name as me (I owned my name as a domain).. I contacted them and told them... they never did anything about it.. now I just filter them out.

    --
    Am I lying when I tell you that im telling the truth? Or am I telling the truth when I say that Im lying?
  83. You brought this on yourself by Benfea · · Score: 1

    Why would you choose a webmail address that uses your real name? That's practically asking for trouble!

  84. I've a pretty uncommon name and... by Zcar · · Score: 1

    ...it happened to me once. I was in Kentucky and the intended recipient was in Iowa. Contacted the guy had a short conversation and discovered he was a first cousin twice removed of mine (son of my great-grandfather's brother) I'd never met.

  85. Am I unusual? by treeves · · Score: 1

    I see a lot of comments from others to whom this has happened or is still happening.
    It has never happened to me.
    I think we need a new poll to see how common it is.

    --
    ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  86. Same here by elPetak · · Score: 1

    I have the same problem but worse.
    I was getting emails from an online bill paying systems from other country that aren't for me. My best guess is that the $%&"&!#$& guy didn't know his own fricking address and entered mine by mistake.
    I got tired of reporting the issue so I finally decided to reset the site password (got the new pass by email), login, change the address and password to something random so I would never remember it and then logoff.
    If people is stupid enough to type a wrong address in their homebanking account they deserve worse than that.

    All the other emails I get that were for someone else, I'm just sending a reply telling the sender that the address is wrong and then I flag it as spam (using gmail).

  87. Behavior modification by dthirteen · · Score: 1

    If you do anything to correct the situation, you are reinforcing the bad behavior, and it will continue to happen with greater frequency.

    You actually get punished more for trying to do the right thing.

    You should just delete them, mark as spam, etc.

    From a behavior stand point you would want to avoid reinforcing the behavior, and possibly also identify a way to punish the behavior -- one could do the wrong thing and publish them online, which might be a punishment (while probably technically legal, this behavior could increase the frequency with which you interact with lawyers).

    In my case, someone has the same name modulo middle name, and his gmail is one character more than mine, so I get a few of their emails a month, at first I tried to respond to the sender, or forward them along, but it just kept happening so I now I delete them or mark them as spam.

  88. Solution? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 2

    The results you got suggest a large number of people who are truly clueless about email and the Internet. Might I suggest that in your initial "This isn't the website you're looking for" email, you provide a small note to the effect of "I reserve the right to post future correspondence from you publicly."

    Then just do what The Pirate Bay does.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  89. same issue, delete or.. by enigmatichmachine · · Score: 1

    I've got the same problem with my gmail account. most I just delete silently. I seem to get a lot of grandparents email kids, to them I reply kindly that they have the wrong person, and to call their grandkids and request the address again.

    some groups don't get it. I was in a group email for a dorm, and setup a filter to reply all when sent email from their college with " I don't go to your school, never have, I've asked repeatedly to be removed from this mailing list, you're all idiots" AFIAK, they got several dozen of these reply spams before they figured out how to remove me from their mailing list. sucks for them, easy enough for me. ;-)

    --
    -and occasionaly a giant moose.
  90. Physical mail, and delete by MadChicken · · Score: 1

    I had this for months, it started to get out of control when the other person bought a bunch of stuff on HSN and I got all the invoices, shipping notices etc. Fortunately (or un-, depending on your viewpoint) they had shipping addresses in the emails. I wrote a direct but polite letter telling them that they are using the wrong address for everything. It really tapered off after that.

    --
    SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
  91. or, you could not share with millions by holophrastic · · Score: 1

    an email address has two (ish) parts. The fact that you have a common name covers the first part. The second part is your fault. You chose to share a domain name with millions of other people.

    Why did you do that?

    Get an address at a different domain name -- or one of your own for a whopping $10 annually, or less. And you problem will go away over-night.

    Stop complaining about free services. The "free" part comes with sacrifices. You've found a great one. And by "great" I mean big.

    1. Re:or, you could not share with millions by jeaton · · Score: 1

      I have a personal domain. I still get misdirected emails. In fact, I get more at my personal email address at my personal domain than I do at my GMail address.

    2. Re:or, you could not share with millions by holophrastic · · Score: 1

      Then you might want to try a domain that people wouldn't randomly mistype? What kind of a random domain do others mistype to yours?

    3. Re:or, you could not share with millions by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      You'd think it'd be really unlikely for someone to mistype something else and get Quirkz, but I didn't count on someone buying Qirkz and then everyone in Australia being unable to type Q without following it with a U and getting me instead. Sometimes you cannot avoid the stupidity of others, and uprooting your own life to avoid some spam is not the sensible solution.

    4. Re:or, you could not share with millions by holophrastic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I agree with you, that's retarded, and not something that you could avoid.

      I had something similar, long ago. My domain had the word "venue" where someone else took hte misspelled "venu". I offered the other owner the service of my forwarding his e-mail to him, at a small cost.

      It actually wound up working out really well. We transitioned to a great solution. I wound up hosting his e-mail service, so I got paid, he paid me instead of someone else, and we worked together to ensure that we didn't both want the exact same mailbox name.

  92. I get the same thing at my personal domain by heypete · · Score: 1

    I have a personal domain, where my email address is firstname@mydomain.example. Naturally, I get a bunch of spam, but the filters take care of that.

    Occasionally I'll get seemingly-legitimate mail for individuals whose names are completely different from my own, yet the sender is evidently using user-entered email addresses. My first name, as my username implies, is "Pete", yet I've gotten mail to my personal account regarding, for example, a woman named Diane who scheduled a service appointment with an Apple Store in New York. The message had legitimately been sent by Apple. Diane had filled out the form on the Apple site and input my address in the email address field. Very odd.

    If I was using a Gmail account, I could see someone with a similar name making such a slip, but getting both the username and the domain name completely wrong? I'm surprised that someone could be foolish enough to make such a mistake, but I am apparently underestimating the stupidity of some people.

  93. The 'no-reply' silliness is the real problem by badger.foo · · Score: 1
    I think you're touching on a very large part of the problem when you write

    > The big problem I am having is with companies and websites. These emails are often no-reply, which means I can't send back a quick note.

    I've always thought that sending messages with invalid return addresses or with a return address that's routed to the functional equivalent of /dev/null is intolerably rude. In fact, I think sending a message with the intention of discarding any reply is pretty close to the maxiumum amount of disrespect you can show your message's recipient.

    I have one message to the executives of companies that send email with 'no-reply' return addresses deserve to be faced with a boycott: If you're not interested in reading our replies, we're not interested in sending you any money either.

    I don't think Microsoft Exchange addiction (as I've blogged on in the past, see my .signature) should count as an excuse either. Sending mail with a deliverable return address is a matter of a minimum of common courtesy and civilty.

    --
    -- That grumpy BSD guy - http://bsdly.blogspot.com/
    1. Re:The 'no-reply' silliness is the real problem by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I agree it's bad in general, but I find it particularly awful when it's a tech support email that comes from a noreply address. MLB.tv has done this to me -- they respond to my technical problem with some half-assed copy-paste solution (it's not *our* site that has the problem, you need to clean your browser cache more often) and then it's from a noreply address and I've got to start over with a new ticket and hope I don't get the same stupid reply the second time around.

      As much as I'm a fan of baseball, I'm not a fan of MLB.tv.

  94. No "Wrong Address"? by BlueTemplar · · Score: 1

    I would have thought the "e-mail protocol" had an equivalent of "wrong address check box"... Isn't that the case? If not, why such an obvious thing was not included when the "protocol" was drafted?

  95. Re:New email address? by SocPres · · Score: 1

    What are you 10? Do you have 1 friend to notify of the new email address and no online billing accounts of your own that you'd have to switch over to use the new email address? Seriously? Slightly more of a hassle than setting up a filter to delete all incoming emails for the idiot that mistypes their own damn email and uses services that don't activate email accounts with confirmation links.

    Which is why you're posting AC?

    Man up and get your own domain, creating a unique address for each contact or group of contacts. Spam? Turn off email and notify the 1 friend or group.

  96. Easy by Krakadoom · · Score: 1

    Send a reply to abuse@whomeveremailedyou.com Most domains still have some sort of mailbox for this.

  97. I get signed up with email lists by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

    I'm using a semi-common name in my email address, and let me tell you, it gets a little annoying at time.

    I have people apparently signing me up with email lists and website accounts (which invariably lead to more email lists). I've gotten emails from Victoria Secret, Build-a-bear Workshops, even some douche who is running for governor of Ohio. None of these sites asked for my permission to add me to their lists, so I just mark them all as spam. After a few months, Gmail tends to catch on and starts pushing them to my spam folder.

    Most companies give a "this isn't my account" option when someone signs up, including Microsoft with their Live IDs. If it's a legit company, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt and click it. Sony doesn't do this for some reason. Someone has signed me up for a PSN account. I get PSN emails. I can't do jack all about them; I contacted Sony support, they told me they would inform the person who signed up for the account. Nothing has happened.

    On the fun side, I got a password that would let me RSVP for the "webby" awards, and I've had people mistake me for the CEO of some company which could lead to shenanigans if I were a lesser person.

  98. Dumbos at ICICI Bank by anand78 · · Score: 1

    I keep getting these emails from ICICI about DEMAT accounts. Whenever I respond and ask to correct the problem. I get a canned response asking about my particulars including amongst other things my cell phone and date of Birth ( Sighh...) I once had a daily back and forth for a week with a guy starting with a standard line " I beg your pardon... Anyway what worked for me was a custom filter taking all messages from ICICI straight into Trash.

  99. Since we have all other variants for a solution... by AwooOOoo · · Score: 1

    ...it seems obvious that you should legally change your common name to something less common and then get an email address that reflects the change. Problem solved =).

  100. Re:Paypal F'ed me because of an idiot like this by michelcolman · · Score: 1

    Go to the PayPal account, "forgot my password", log in with the new password, change e-mail address. You might get sued for hacking, but if you already tried different methods and nobody wanted to help, I imagine you should be OK.

  101. Why don't companies send confirmation emails??? by cshay · · Score: 1

    I have the same problem as the OP with random 5th graders constantly signing me up for mail lists or services when they forget their correct email address. Very very few of these lists are sending a confirmation email with a link used to confirm.

    Boggles the mind.

    1. Re:Why don't companies send confirmation emails??? by black+soap · · Score: 1

      because it costs them nothing NOT to do it. I've even had companies (Paypal) tell me that I must have confirmed the address, because otherwise my address wouldn't be in their files. They accused me of confirming the address, and that it was therefore my problem.

  102. Delete it by SilverJets · · Score: 1

    Simply delete it. Or if there is enough of it set up Gmail to mark it as spam and trash it that way.

    I was dealing with the same issue. I've had my Gmail account since Gmail first started handing out accounts. Then a couple of years ago someone over in England registered their own Gmail account and I'm guessing it is different from mine by one or two characters at the most. I wound up getting emails from this person's family, friends, etc. as well as e-mail confirmations for online purchases. I have responded to the friend's and family (including this person's own daughter) telling them they have the wrong person and would they please let that other person know that they are giving out the wrong e-mail address. It never stopped. So now, I don't give a FARK. I delete it. If they can't be bothered to get something as simple as an e-mail address correct, I can't be bothered to care enough to do something other than delete their mail.

  103. Most Interesting Emails by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    I receive lots of these e-mails actually. One of the curses of having [First Initial][Lastname]@gmail.com with no trailing letters/numbers I guess. Usually I'll just write a curt reply about having the wrong e-mail address, but occasionally I'll mess with people:

    Random Dude: I'm so sorry baby, please stop ignoring me.
    Me: Fuck you, don't ever email me again.
    Random Dude: I deserve that. But I still love you.
    Me: If you really love me then you'll leave me alone.

    Unfortunately there's no way to know what happened after that. Did he realize I wasn't who he thought? Did he get in an argument with his ex-lover about what they never wrote? Who knows. But this was by far the most unusual I think:

    From: geena <____@gmail.com>
    Date: Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:19 PM
    Subject: Re: i hate all of you
    To: Stacy <____@gmail.com>
    Cc: "Kathryn" <____@gmail.com>, ____@gmail.com

    we found these fake stickers yesterday and i put a butterfly tramp stamp on chris and another butterfly on his pee pee. i put a butterfly on top of my hoohaa. pictures available upon request.

    I actually left that one alone, until one day I got a friend request on Facebook when the sender apparently added her contact list from GMail. She turned out to be pretty cute too. I said, "Hey, I remember you! You're that girl who tried to send me pictures of your naughty bits." Which was quite the icebreaker.

  104. Re:Dumbass by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

    I think he's simply trying to be a decent person.

    I live in a world where people walk right by rape and violent muggings, don't report or stand witness for murders, etc, because it's "not their problem" and they don't want to "get involved" because of time commitment or retaliation or personal danger.

    World of honorless cowards.

  105. Re:Change your email by nabsltd · · Score: 1

    Try to get firstname.mi.lastname@gmail.com at minimum if you name is really common.

    Since periods are ignored in gmail addresses, this might just shift the problem a bit, depending on whether adding a letter to the end of your first name (or beginning of your last) still results in a common name.

  106. Google for domains by jason777 · · Score: 1

    I can't believe no one suggested this. Get you own domain name. They are like $8. Then, you can create a google for domains gmail account that uses your own domain but through the gmail system. You post to slashdot, surely you can figure this out right? Forward your old address, and phase it out. Since you'll use your own domain, it will definitely be unique to you.

    1. Re:Google for domains by vrimj · · Score: 1

      I have one for fun, but I use first.last@gmail.com for business stuff. I guess I should suck it up and get another for business related uses.

    2. Re:Google for domains by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      With your own domain you are also less likely to receive spam from a dictionary attack. The dictionary spammers focus on the popular domains for obvious reasons.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
  107. Re:Dots are not processed for gmail accounts by nabsltd · · Score: 1

    I'm hoping their account creation filter knows this, and doesn't let someone create joe.smith if joesmith already exists.

    Why "hope"? This is /., and we expect people who want to know the answer would just test it out.

  108. Re:Gmail's canned responses are worthless by vrimj · · Score: 1

    Ah! Much of my misdirected email is firstnamelastname@gmail. I wonder if this is the root of the problem.

  109. I get this all the time by RichM · · Score: 1

    I've not got a massively popular surname, but thanks to having a FirstInitialSurname@gmail account, I get tons of the stuff.

    I've had the following:

    - Job offer for the Vice President of Communications (ha!) for the Carlyle Group
    - Invoices from storage companies
    - Bills from Qwest Communications which unbelievably include a temporary username/password to log into the customer's account, imagine the fun to be had here
    - Party invitations
    - Bank statements
    - Random email conversations that I have been CC'd into
    - Pictures sent from mobile phones (usually by the owner to what they think is their email address)

    Occasionally I email back, but most of the time I don't bother - it's their own damn fault.

  110. Re:New email address? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    Why should I have to change my name? He's the one who sucks!

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  111. Disclaimers at the bottom of emails by RichM · · Score: 1

    Another pet hate of mine is those stupid fucking disclaimers at the bottom of emails sent from companies.
    They usually bang on about "if this email has been sent in error you agree to delete it and inform the sender and must not disclose the contents to a third party... " etc.
    Yeah right...what a load of bollocks.

    I'm not a lawyer but I'm betting that virtually all of this junk is legally unenforceable because to enter into any kind of agreement or legal contract you have to agree to it first - that's why it's called an agreement...
    Email sent by mistake can be considered the same as spam - unsolicited email.

  112. Common Number by toastar · · Score: 1
    How is this any different then getting a "wrong number" phone call. ?

    Is JSmith@gmail.com really that different then 867-5309?

    1. Re:Common Number by ReverendLoki · · Score: 2

      Jenny Smith, is that you?

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:Common Number by Smallpond · · Score: 2

      Because you can just tell the person they dialed the wrong number.
      Once you are on a no-reply email list you are stuck unless you want to invest your own time and money into fixing someone else's problem

    3. Re:Common Number by Antonovich · · Score: 1

      Yes and no... Our company is in the very unenviable position of having only two digits inverted from the support desk of a MAJOR online retailer (not in the US). The worst part? The company in question is one of OUR oldest and dearest customers! People ring up, and are told, "sorry we can't help you". "So you have nothing to do with X". "Well, yes, but...". Then they go on for several minutes insisting that OUR service desk should help them get a replacement Y. And we can't even be rude to them!

    4. Re:Common Number by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Wrong. You treat them like any other non-solicited email. You tell your mail provider to block them, and if there is no mechanism for that, you tell your email client to auto delete them. Problem solved.

    5. Re:Common Number by Belial6 · · Score: 2

      Your description is one of a self inflicted problem. Instead of saying "Sorry, we can't help you", you should say "Sorry you have a wrong number." If you are feeling generous, you could follow up with "You inverted the 4th and 5th digits. The company you wanted to call is at xxx-xxx-xxxx."

    6. Re:Common Number by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Or if you're feeling even more generous, and this is very common, have "forward call to the right number" on quick-dial.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    7. Re:Common Number by Thu+Anon+Coward · · Score: 1

      Problem NOT solved. What if you end up getting an account with the same company that sent you the wrong email? You just screwed yourself by blocking and auto-deleting.

      The IDEAL SOLUTION would be for gmail/hotmail/yahoo/whatever to have a button just like the spam button that would then return the email to the sender as BOUNCED address email. You could make that decision. Spammers like to have current valid email address lists to sell to others, and if it bounces back as BAD, then not only will they remove it from the list, you've cut off that spammer. They don't really know if your email address is valid or not.

      But wait, you say, then the spammers will never cut addresses off the list. Really? When all those returned emails start hitting THEIR email server and THEY have to process it, how happy do you think they will be? And even if they auto-delete, it will still be flodding their pipe to the Internet which slows down their whole operation, which will make them spend more of their own money to get another OC3 to flood spam which will get bounced back...... are you starting to see the point here? and even if they have buckets of money to spend on that, how happy do you think their pipe provider is gonna be that they are maxing out the pipe and causing a burden on THEIR network?

      anyone care to point out the flaw in my logic?

      --



      I'm good with numbers - .45, 7.62, 9.....
    8. Re:Common Number by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      You are under the misinterpretation that the return address on most spam is valid. It isn't. Bouncing spam does not clog the spammers pipes. I clogs some other victim. That is why the best technical solution is to block it at the time of connection. If spammers are going to take off an address, it can only happen if the connection is refused as that is the only time that most spammers can be notified the address is invalid.

      The number of times that you will have a legitimate email that is sent to the wrong address AND is from someone you also have an account with will be pretty small. Even still, you set your client to delete any email with the other persons name in it and a From address that matches the sender. Problem solved. Your emails show up. The incorrect ones don't.

      These are old problems that have long ago been solved or at least minimized to the point that there isn't much more to do about it. So, we are still looking at a self inflicted problem.

  113. Re:Paypal F'ed me because of an idiot like this by TheBig1 · · Score: 1

    Does Paypal have a 'forgot password' link which sends you the password reset link? If so, reset it.

  114. Re:New email address? by pdboddy · · Score: 1

    Don't be a goober. Changing your email address 'cause someone else's email is getting to you is like buying a new house because you got your neighbor's snailmail. The guy's comment is legit: How many friends and family members have your email address? How many forums have you signed up with yours? Do you do any online banking? Use eBay? Or Paypal? Do you not know how much of a pain in the ass it would be to change your email address and sort out all the stuff you'd have to change?

    --
    Julie Moult is an idiot.
  115. Re:Gmail's canned responses are worthless by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

    Ah!
    Much of my misdirected email is firstnamelastname@gmail. I wonder if this is the root of the problem.

    My gmail address is lastname@gmail.com, so the period thing is not the problem. Also, there is no way that is obvious to me that my last name could be the combination of any reasonable first and last name.

    Most of the misdirected email that I receive is intended for people who share my (uncommon) last name. I've found that a polite canned response takes little of my time, and is effective in the vast majority of cases.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  116. No Reply Emails by eav · · Score: 1

    If I can't email them back about the problem, I create a filter to delete all further emails from that specific address.

  117. Re:Change the Domain, not your name. by Quirkz · · Score: 1

    Yep, me, too. I picked a domain name, one that's neither a person's name, nor even a real word, and I *still* get someone else's email because they opened a domain that's just like mine, except missing one letter. There's only so much you can do to avoid someone else's stupidity.

  118. Effing egoists by iamavirus · · Score: 1

    Just because a lot of people seem to advocate silently tossing the email, or replying with intent to confuse... I once got an email asking me to confirm details for a wedding (cake? Don't remember). Of course I responded! Think of the consequences of just dropping all incorrect emails. Arguably people shouldn't send critical information by email (hah!). Perhaps you can get sued (USA! Hah!). Yes, it may cost you some time to clear it out (yet you're wasting time on slashdot?).

  119. Some clients will "bounce" mail for you by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    Some mail clients (Mac Mail.app for one) will generate an SMTP non-delivery report for you - if you look at the mail and determine it to be spam, you can select a menu option to bounce it. No idea whether you can set up something to refuse delivery altogether (which would be better), but at least a bounce ought to get someone's attention on the sending side.

  120. use a different address by belmolis · · Score: 1

    You could avoid most of these emails in the first place by changing your email address. There's no law that requires your email to be of the form .. Use something entirely different, or give yourself, for email purposes, an uncommon middle name. John.Smith@gmail.com is going to get a lot of mail; Abdullah.Suzuki.Cohen@gmail.com is not.

    1. Re:use a different address by chefmonkey · · Score: 1

      Well, now it is.

    2. Re:use a different address by heypete · · Score: 1

      I've had a personal domain since 1999 (it's my slashdot username followed by .com). Nobody else in the world has ever had email service at that domain; it's just my account and a few role accounts (postmaster@, abuse@, etc.). Nothing else.

      I still get mis-addressed email, which is odd when the intended recipient is not named "Pete".

      Why should I change my email address (which is a major part of my online identity) simply because there's idiots out there who can't understand how email works?

  121. "Call me" by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
    I used to get a lot of personal emails for some guy with a similar name, from his sister, parents, frat brothers, employer, etc. Originally, I tried telling them"you've got the wrong guy, please let him know," but one time, his parents refused to believe me and thought I was him playing a joke.

    Now, I just reply with "It's an emergency, please call me. I can't talk over email for legal reasons." I figure that's the best way to get them to actually reach out to him in person.

  122. Have fun with it by Hjalmar · · Score: 1

    I used to track down the people who were using my address and set them right. I took a certain delight in contacting people and saying "You don't know me, but you're using my email address and you should stop." In fact, I have an amusing story about it.

    Years ago, my home email address was [my first name]@[big isp].net. This was around 10 years ago, and fairly often someone with the same first name as me would sign up and merrily start handing out my email address.

    One day I logged in and check my email, and find several email messages clearly meant for someone else. Included in the messages were receipts from online shops, which included the other man's home address, though not his phone number. At first I wasn't going to do anything about it, but then I found a message from a gentleman that this other person had met at a gay bar.

    I didn't mind that someone was giving my email address to various vendors online, but now it was a little more personal, so I took action.

    Having the person's street address, I tried the phone directory, but found that his home number was unlisted. So I called a friend of mine who worked at a law firm, and asked them if they could do any searches on scary privacy-invading databases and get the man's home phone number. My friend couldn't promise anything, saying "unlisted phone numbers can be pretty hard to get".

    A couple hours later my friend called me back. "His number is unlisted, and I couldn't get it. But his wife's number was pretty easy to find."

    I called the number and left a message "This message is for [first name]; you've been using my email address, and given the sensitive nature of the email messages I've been getting, you probably don't want to do that."

    The misdirected emails stopped immediately.

  123. Re:Gmail's canned responses are worthless by Skreems · · Score: 1

    My own gmail account got hacked a couple weeks ago by someone presumably from China (and I had a very complex, secure password), so it looks like I am probably going to abandon gmail as well myself, since they're rapidly becoming untrustable anymore. Too bad, it used to be a very good email account for me for many years until recently now that Google seems to have gone down the toilet with regard to security.

    As far as I know, they're one of the only providers to offer two-factor authentication, which should vastly increase the security of your account over just a password...

    --
    Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
    The Urban Hippie
  124. Re:New email address? by SocPres · · Score: 1

    Goober or not, it's surprisingly easy to maintain. I have somewhere near 200 email addresses. Almost all have a single contact; a few are "group" addresses. When some schnook of a vendor I've used gets a virus that spams their customer rep's address book, I disable that address and use a new one. Since the beginning of 2010, I've needed to use this procedure 9 whole times -- one every other month. Spam counts at zero. Bounced messages near zero. And I don't pay for the traffic that typical spam generates or the maintenance of spam software itself.

    Like another poster inferred, the problem will very likely never go away if the OP's current email address is kept. My method certainly isn't for everyone, but it works very well for me. And maybe some other goober, too.

  125. same here on steroids by digibud · · Score: 1

    I got my gmail address when it was in beta if I recall correctly. It is therefore a simple one like name@gmail.com. On top of that it is a very common name in a European country. I thought it was great to have that gmail address till I started getting all sorts of email meant for another person..then another...I just mark as spam and filter. No problem. Not my worry. Simple solutions for simple problems.

  126. Re:Easy fix by Quirkz · · Score: 1

    No, but it's the combination to my luggage!

    Er, wrong slashdot meme?

  127. Re:Dumbass by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    I live in a world where people walk right by rape and violent muggings, don't report or stand witness for murders, etc, because it's "not their problem" and they don't want to "get involved" because of time commitment or retaliation or personal danger.

    World of honorless cowards.

    Rorschach, is that you?

  128. all you can do is what you can do... by DeanOh · · Score: 1

    I bought an early gmail invite on ebay and scored my last name. It's it's not common...unless you're in Hungary, where it's the equivalent of "Smith".

    All the spam: deleted.

    All the stuff from "no reply" accounts where somebody with the same last name thought my email address was theirs: deleted.

    The occasional item that looks like no kidding news of importance something somebody really should know about (over the years it has included deaths in the family, suicidal relatives, travel plans, job offers, real estate contracts and tax returns): i shoot a note to the sender and invite them to double check.

    For the longest time I was in on the wine-tastings, car-customizing, antique-buying, charitable fund raising and investment meetings of some very wealthy people in southern California. Loved looking at the houses whose addresses where listed on Google maps. Big damned places...one of them next to a fucking polo field. The very rich are different indeed...

  129. This happens to me by Riot.ATL · · Score: 1

    After several months of deleting this guy's emails, I get one that is showing a confirmation of renting a car at an Enterprise location here. So I call them up and say "Mr. So and So will be picking up a car at 5:30, correct?" They confirmed, so I said "Tell him to stop using my email address for all of his shit. I'm sick of deleting everything that's meant for him." "Yes, sir!" Not an email was received afterwards

  130. For a while... by shafnitz · · Score: 1

    For a while I was receiving the Sprint wireless bill and Amazon orders for some guy. He never paid his Sprint bill and eventually it got up to over $500. I think they finally closed his account so I stopped getting those. For Amazon, I changed his password and closed his account. His credit card was on file, so I could have been a lot more malicious, but fortunately for him, I generally try to be a nice person. As far as these types of emails go, I get at least a few every week. It's pretty remarkable how many people don't know what their own email address is.

  131. Hits me too. by Bryan+Bytehead · · Score: 1

    They range from California to Chicago to Canada to Singapore. 10 emails trying to confirm a cable installation appointment. Check your email address instead of taking the remembered form data! Microcenter pamphlets for stores that are several hundred miles away. The one in Singapore was trying to buy a car, and luckily, I was able to google enough to find him on Facebook. Various university buds trying to reach their buddy (and still keep managing to send me email...).

    I really wish that Gmail offered a bounce option.

    --
    Bryan
  132. Doctor what should I do? by Married+to+Christ · · Score: 1

    I have the same problem. My email address is drMyLastName@gmail.com. Doesn't happen too often but when it does the mistaken emails can be quite interesting. DR is actually just my initials but I try to help by giving advice whenever I can.

  133. Gmail accounts hacked? by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    That's news right there if it's true.

    What evidence do you have that someone else got into your Gmail account?

    Anyone else have evidence someone else has just started getting into their Gmail account with authorization?

  134. You are spamming people. by mjwx · · Score: 1

    I usually take the opportunity to send them an email explaining the differences and plug my own business and wares (a browser-based computer game, which at least *might* interest some Aussies). They can't call it spam,

    You're wrong, that _IS_ spam.

    It is unsolicited commercial email, the dictionary definition of Spam.

    A mistaken or mistyped email is not carte blanc for you to send unsolicited advertising to people. The Advertising law in this nation is very _VERY_ clear about this.

    Kogan sends me marketing material because I opted into that. Singapore Airlines sends me marketing material because I signed up to their mailing list, Flight Centre _DOES NOT_ send me marketing material because I have not opted into their marketing list. I'm assuming you see the connection here.

    If you did this to me, I wouldn't flame you via email, I'd report you to ACMA. You should be very grateful none of your victims have been this smart.

    If I mistakenly email you, this does not give you rights to spam me. I have still not solicited you for anything thus any commercial email is still unsolicited.

    I do get someone else's mail occasionally because there is a south African woman with a similar Gmail address to me (For example, I'm BDawson@gmail and she is BDawson1@gmail). I've taken the liberty of notifying the sender that the address used was incorrect and just deleted the message, which is what you should do.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    1. Re:You are spamming people. by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      A mistaken or mistyped email is not carte blanc for you to send unsolicited advertising to people. The Advertising law in this nation is very _VERY_ clear about this. ... If you did this to me, I wouldn't flame you via email, I'd report you to ACMA. You should be very grateful none of your victims have been this smart.

      Are you really so wound up about spam that if you called up the wrong shop and started asking confusing questions, you'd really be mad at the shopkeep who -- while giving you the phone number to the shop you actually want but you've somehow mangled -- also tells you what his own shop does? Sheesh.

      Outraged as you might be about it, the people I've actually helped have been almost universally thankful and/or apologetic. Call them "victims" all you want, but they appeared to be happier that I answered as I did than if I'd left them unanswered and without assistance.

    2. Re:You are spamming people. by msauve · · Score: 1

      "It is unsolicited commercial email"

      No, you're wrong. Sending someone an unprompted email is a solicitation for a response. That they speak of one thing, and you respond with another is immaterial.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    3. Re:You are spamming people. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      "It is unsolicited commercial email"

      No, you're wrong. Sending someone an unprompted email is a solicitation for a response. That they speak of one thing, and you respond with another is immaterial.

      Where do you get that idea from.

      solicitedpast participle, past tense of soÂlicÂit (Verb) 1. Ask for or try to obtain (something) from someone.

      An email that goes unintended to the wrong recipient is not solicitation. Using your logic, because you responded to my comment, I am entitled to bill you for the time it took to correct you. Please respond with your billing address, I charge A$2,500 an hour with minimum of 2 hours engagement.

      Or yould you please understand words before you use them.

      Sarcasm and logic aside, you're dead wrong because Australian law is quite clear and ACMA (Australian Communications and Media Authority) is very strict on what is spam. See here.

      Consent â" the message must be sent with your consent
      Identify â" the message must contain accurate information about the person or organisation that authorised the sending of the message
      Unsubscribe â" the message must contain a functional 'unsubscribe' facility to allow you to opt out of receiving messages from that source.

      The GP is wrong on two out of three counts.

      An email that is not intended for the recipient does not give implied consent.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    4. Re:You are spamming people. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Are you really so wound up about spam

      Yes, spam is constant pain for me.

      I'm a sysadmin. We maintain a special place for spammers, it's in the same cell as the lifer named Bubba.

      that if you called up the wrong shop and started asking confusing questions

      Wrong analogy.

      A more correct analogy is if I went into BBQ's galore to ask directions to Red Rooster and they wouldn't let me go until I bought a barbeque.

      So don't hide behind false dichotomies you sent unwanted emails without the consent of the recipient on purpose. That means you've actually broken the law in this country.

      By your own admission you are in violation of the Spam act of 2003. Please read about it more on ACMA's website.. This is why I'd simply report you to ACMA.

      You do not meet the criteria for "consent" or "unsubscribe". You are wrong here, legally wrong and using fallacious arguments wont fix that. Read this page for more info on consent.

      Can I send an electronic message to customers to obtain their consent to send messages in the future?
      No. Unsolicited commercial electronic messages cannot be used to gain consent.

      If recipients donâ(TM)t object or unsubscribe, can I assume I have consent?
      No, silence does not constitute consent. Just because a person does not actively unsubscribe from your mailing list does not mean they consent to receiving commercial electronic messages from you. You must have either express or inferred consent before you send such messages.

      You must have express consent, a mistaken email address is not express consent in any court in the country.

      And finally I do hate idiots like you, because you make it harder for people like me who maintain legitimate mailing lists of people who actually want to know about the products and services I (or my clients) offer. This is why I understand the Spam Act (2003), I work legitimately within it.

      Would you like it if I, a legitimate bulk email provider, were to flood your inbox with offers for my services for bulk email (you're clearly OK with spamming).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    5. Re:You are spamming people. by Capsaicin · · Score: 1

      Call them "victims" all you want, but they appeared to be happier that I answered as I did than if I'd left them unanswered and without assistance.

      99 out of 100 Australians would respond the same way, but that won't help you if you strike a mjwx one day. Bear in mind that Spam Act 2003 (C'th) [yes they seriously called it that], makes it an offence to send "unsolicited commercial electronic messages."

      Note what follows is NOT legal advice: Were I a practising lawyer giving you legal advice it would probably be simply to desist from advertising (we tend to want to avoid trouble), but since I'm a non-practising one not giving you legal advice, I will point you to section 2 of the First Schedule which you should read in conjunction with section 16 so that you can assess for yourself (preferably with professional input) whether your behaviour is liable to get you into trouble.

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
    6. Re:You are spamming people. by Capsaicin · · Score: 1

      No, you're wrong. Sending someone an unprompted email is a solicitation for a response.

      Hmm my first reply went walkabout ...

      The question here isn't what you think is fair or not, the question is whether Qurikz' has committed an offence under Australian anti-spam legislation such that mjwx's complaint would carry any weight or not.

      What you are in effect claiming (though you might not realise it. :) is that mistakenly sending an email to a commercial party constitutes consent ( per Spam Act 2003 (C'th), Schedule 2, 2(b)(ii) ). Now I won't say you are wrong, but it does seem along bow to draw.

      OTOH, Quirkz may well escape criminal liability on other grounds. The question is not nearly as simply as either you or mjwx imagine.

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
    7. Re:You are spamming people. by Capsaicin · · Score: 1

      By your own admission you are in violation of the Spam act of 2003.

      I'm not saying you are wrong, but you seem quite certain of that. Have you entirely dismissed the possibility that the message might qualify as a designated commercial electronic message for the purposes of s16?

      [A] mistaken email address is not express consent in any court in the country.

      If you have an actual case with this precise fact scenario could you please provide the citation. That should settle the argument.

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
    8. Re:You are spamming people. by msauve · · Score: 1

      Consent " the message must be sent with your consent Identify " the message must contain accurate information about the person or organisation that authorised the sending of the message Unsubscribe " the message must contain a functional 'unsubscribe' facility to allow you to opt out of receiving messages from that source."

      "The GP is wrong on two out of three counts... An email that is not intended for the recipient does not give implied consent."

      He's wrong on none. Sending an email does imply consent - the sender is initiating communications, providing their return address, and for virtually all MTUs, a REPLY-TO: header. The "unsubscribe" requirement is obviously directed toward automated mailing lists. The functional unsubscribe is fulfilled by simply not emailing further - you don't want email from the OP, stop sending email to him (he said nothing about placing people on any such automated list).

      Regardless of whether you agree or not, there's no ethical problem, and you're deluded if you think any authority would take any sort of legal action in such a situation.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    9. Re:You are spamming people. by Capsaicin · · Score: 1

      ... it certainly implies consent to receive a reply to that correspondence.

      I doubt that consent is required at all to "reply to that correspondence." No one here is arguing that forwarding a misdirected email to its intended recipient is a crime in Australia. The offence contemplated in section 16 is that of sending a commercial electronic message, that is a message which intends to offer for sale ...; advertise or promote ...; &c., &c. (s6). That is what requires specific consent.

      If you can express, with certitude, the opinion that a misdirected email is sufficient to satisfy the consent requirements stipulated in Schedule 2 of the Act, I think we are entitled to conclude that you are not, in fact, a lawyer. :)

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
  135. Took ages by LifesRoadie · · Score: 1

    My gmail account seems to attract this stuff and, obliging fellow that I am, I prefer to return the emails pointing out their mistake and even suggesting the correct address to try. But a US company director kept sending confidential stuff to a consultant which was actually my email address and included heaps of very confidential file attachments. I sent back multiple emails trying to get them to look at where they were sending this stuff, until finally I copied and pasted their own email disclaimer, highlighted the part for them that said "advise us if you receive this in error" and said FFS read your own words!

    That finally got their attention, and the issue was passed to one of their VP's who was full of fear at first, but when he found I'm not a US citizen he relaxed a little and we focused on resolving the issue. He had '"fear-of-lawsuit" written all over his emails until he relaxed, but I think that whole process took about 3 years.

  136. I now have 3 facebook accts and am on cupid.com by Shivantrill · · Score: 1

    People love to think their email address is @ my domain. I reported one guy to facebook and he kept signing up. I got tired of dealing with it and I get invites to all kinds of stuff all written in italian. One guy signed up on cupid.com, now that has been interesting :P It's annoying and has been for years. Now I usually just delete them. Sometimes I will reply depending on the email. But yeah it would be cool if there was a way to stamp it "return to sender, no one by that name at this address" like you do snail mail.

    --
    Karma, We don't need no stinkin' karma!
    1. Re:I now have 3 facebook accts and am on cupid.com by stiggle · · Score: 1

      If its not a known account/address/alias then it should be bounced (return to sender, unknown user), unless you have one of those 'catch-all' email addresses which accepts anything sent to a domain

  137. Opinion by Capsaicin · · Score: 1

    Shrink wrap licenses are legally binding contracts in the US, at least in the 7th Cir.

    What Zeidenberg proves is that a button asking a party to agree to terms is a valid offer and that a mouse-click on that button constitutes a valid acceptance sufficient to form a binding contract. It is, in my opinon, an unremarkable result. Moreover it is a result based on facts are pertiently distinguished from the present case.

    [I realise you were probably only disabusing the parent as to his/her comment re shrink-wrap licenses, but to the veer back onto topic ...]

    In the present case the mail is unsolicited; it is fetched from a mail server without any specific human intervention; and -most importantly -the statement purporting to impose a contractual obligation on the reader of the email is evident only after the mouse-click to open the mail has been made. Quite apart from the question of what consideration might flow to the reader of an unsolicited email (upon which the putative contract might also fail) there has been no acceptance of any agreement by the reader of the mail sufficient to impose upon the reader an obligation to "destroy all copies this email."

    Next we must turn to the issue of whether there exists any statutory provision, over and above contract law, which may impose such an obligation upon the reader. ...

    --
    Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
    1. Re:Opinion by harl · · Score: 1

      I was only offering information. I took no positions.

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
    2. Re:Opinion by Capsaicin · · Score: 1

      I was only offering information. I took no positions.

      And then only in response the the comment about shrink-wrap contracts. Yes that's how I read you post, hence my bracketed comment. My comment was not a criticism of anything your wrote, which was, after all only factual information.

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
  138. Re:"It isn't spam, but it isn't my meat." by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 1

    It is spam. You never asked them to send those emails to you. [...] when your address is not public, you are free to report them to spamcop.

    Why would you pollute spam filters with legitimate mail? While they're not for you, they are probably useful to someone, wrongly categorising them as spam degrades the quality of spam filters. Just delete or filter them.

    --
    Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
  139. Dump It! by Pf0tzenpfritz · · Score: 1

    Dump it! For heaven's sake, throw it away as soon as you realize, it's not for you. As a long term mail server admin, it's the only advise I could give you. Whatever else you might do only makes you appear as the one who causes "that email trouble". You might get sued, assaulted, blamed distrusted but nobody would ever thank you for being honest. .

    --
    Oh, the beautiful gloss of greality!
  140. GMail confuses dots in names by bjb · · Score: 1
    I've actually got a similar problem with gmail that is kind of annoying. I have had my address with them since 2004 (when you still needed to be invited to get an account) and scored my first.last name.

    Apparently there is someone out there with the same name but decided to be firstlast instead (probably because I took the dot) and I'm guessing they're fine with using it as a login. However, all email that goes to firstlast ends up going into my inbox.

    I was good for a while pointing this out to some people (especially when he must have had a date and the girl emailed him to thank him afterwards), but realized that the missing dot is translated to my address which is either a good or bad thing.. not sure. I just ignore and delete firstlast's emails now.

    Of course, we could come to a solution for this if gmail had some kind of support email address...

    --
    Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
  141. Same Problem by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

    I have a similar problem. My e-mail address is first initial last name @ gmail.com, i.e. jsmith@gmail.com. There is a doctor in Canada that has the exact same name. His e-mail address is the same thing, but he duplicated the last letter, i.e. jsmithh@gmail.com. He is on the board for a church of some sort because I constantly get mail from people about things related to his church. I also get medical related e-mails, mostly stuff about conferences, etc...nothing patient related. I did a Google of my e-mail address and found out that the hospital where he works has an online directory and they had my e-mail address published under his name. I e-mailed them 2 or 3 times over the course of as many weeks explaining their error and asking them to fix it. I received no response. So then I did a whois on the domain and repeated the process with the domain contact. I think it took three e-mails before I finally received a response, and to be fair they did apologize and fix the problem. The big problem is that when the guy gives out his e-mail address, people glance at it and assume it is his first initial and last name, they miss the extra letter at the end. So I e-mailed the guy and told him I was getting a bunch of his mail and suggested that he might want to think about changing to an easier to read e-mail address (after all based on the time this started happening, I'm guessing that I've had my gmail account a lot longer than he's had his). I never received a response from him. So for a while I would forward messages intended for him to his correct e-mail address, but after about a year I got tired of doing it. So I e-mailed him and said that I was just going to start deleting the misdirected e-mails because I was tired of dealing with his mail. I still get stuff for him and just delete it now. He's missing a ton of mail, and I guess he doesn't care. Some people just don't care it seems.