Slashdot Mirror


Bill Gates Looks to Reinvent the Toilet

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the German government are working on a $10 million project to provide innovative sanitation facilities to 800,000 Kenyans over the next five years. From the article: "The goal is to find 'innovative solutions' for sanitation in poor urban areas. Gates says it's time to move on from the era of the classic toilet. He points out that, despite all the recent achievements, 40% of the world's population, or some 2.5 billion people, still lives without proper means of flushing away excrement. But just giving them Western-style toilets isn't possible because of the world's limited water resources." I wonder what the toilet version of The Blue Screen of Death is.

471 comments

  1. Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm just curious how someone will find a way to spin this as a bad thing. Will it be "Gates will probably insist they use only Windows toilets!"? Or maybe it will be "This is just a ploy for him to sell more Windows copies to the poor people after they take a shit!" Or perhaps "I'll be he'll ban Linux and Apple from these shithouses!"

    Come on, I know there are plenty of Slashdotters just ACHING to find SOME way, ANY way to bash him some more. Forget that Steve Jobs does NO charitable activities (Steve don't do charity) or that this has nothing to do with Linux. Someone will find a way. He's the guy with the Borg picture, after all.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by DemonGenius · · Score: 5, Funny

      The real question is... will those toilets run Crysis?

    2. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by lordSaurontheGreat · · Score: 0

      The framerate will be crap, but after a few Service Packs, yes, it will.

      --
      Consider yourself spoken to.
    3. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by erroneus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The bashing began before you started typing. Did you read the summary?

    4. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by nschubach · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm just trying to figure out why he wants to violate the KISS methodology. You have few options for feces. Put it it into a treatment facility (flush, carry...) to be treated with bacteria that live on that sort of thing, use it for fertilizer or burn it.

      The use of toilets in "western society" simply facilitates the first step in those methods be it an out house, a ceramic bowl, or fancy plastic. I don't understand what he wants them to do. Maybe learn how to use sea shells for less paper usage? There's only so much waste you can get rid of with a small amount of water, and any breakthrough in toilet technology that would make it cheap enough for the third world and use little water will likely be patent encumbered for the next 50 years (probably by Bill himself.)

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    5. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by bmo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >Forget that Steve Jobs does NO charitable activities

      Steve Jobs isn't public about whether or not he does charities. He thinks it's none of your business.

      And I tend to agree with him on that point.

      Some people use charity as a means of self-promotion.

      Who is better, the Christian that goes to church every Sunday and makes sure everyone knows he goes to church, or the Christian that doesn't always go to church, but volunteers at the soup kitchen downtown and tells nobody?

      Disclaimer, I am a lapsed Episcopalian. I can fake my way through a Catholic Mass for weddings and funerals, but that's about it.

      --
      BMO

    6. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I would say the bashing started in the article. I'm a huge fan of this juxtaposition:

      The importance of this research is not always easy to explain, says Rijsberman, because anything having to do with human waste provokes a "yuck factor." (See Bill Gates in his younger years.)

      The "See Bill Gates in his younger years" is a link to a different article, one of several sprinkled throughout the article, as is standard fare for Time Online. However, I don't really believe it was a coincidence that this particular link wound up where it did.

    7. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need at least 2 toilets to get good frame rates in Crysis.

       

    8. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends: sometimes public charity can encourage others to contribute, which anonymous charity generally doesn't..

    9. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Zerth · · Score: 1

      Sterilize it with heat(but without burning it it) and then use it for fertilizer.

      However, that is kind of energy intensive. Giant fresnel furance?

    10. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by jhoegl · · Score: 5, Funny

      "He doesnt know what the three sea shells are for!"

    11. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      No need to spin it.
      Odds are high they will do what they did with the medicine. To get the free stuff you have to agree not to infringe on patents on drugs they invest in. This means the third world nations get the choice of free drugs now and high prices later or making their own generics and growing the local economy.

    12. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by femtoguy · · Score: 2

      My only complaint is with the headline. It should read "Bill Gates looks to give money to people to invent a new toilet". I am pretty sure that he will not be involved in the actual development. I think that his foundation does a lot of good work, and respect the fact that he isn't just hording his money, but it should also be recognized that the actual work is done by people in the field, and not by him personally.

      Actually, it kind of reminds me of a recent, very bad decision, at work. We hired a firm to develop a new web site. We checked their previous work and it looked good. As we got more deeply involved with them we discovered that the "company" was actually a couple of business front guys who wrote the contracts, and then farmed out the work to a bunch of contract college student programmers. When we ran into implementation problems, the couldn't help us because they didn't know any of the technology, and their contract workers had moved on and so couldn't help us either. But they still maintain that they are the key players in the complany, despite having no expertise in the work that they are doing.

    13. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Bill Gates is awesome. I mean, who can't respect a man that is able to do so much evil, then do nothing to fix that evil (even lying to judges about it!), take a few years off, and make a comeback by using some of the money he gain via those evil deeds for charity, to the point that nobody thinks he's a bad guy!

      Incredible, I say. Imagine if Ted Bundy was able do this.

    14. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Moryath · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why not have a dual system?

      Liquid waste goes into a liquid recyc system, to be chemically cleansed and reused in future flushes. Doesn't need to be electric powered; you should be able to pump up a couple gallons into a reserve flush bin by a hand-crank pump fairly easily. Solid waste filters out into a bin to be taken away for treatment later (carried or otherwise). That way, you don't have to worry about wasting good, potable water on your flushes.

    15. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      I don't need to bash him, but your need to whitewash him is curious. He did both bad and good things.

      Steve Jobs may or may not do charity. It's really his business, isn't it?

      It's curious to me that people who do far less with their lives feel the need to either bring down either man or erect a podium for them. It doesn't make you a better person to be a slobbering idol worshipper nor a spiteful harpy about it.

    16. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      Who is better, the Christian that goes to church every Sunday and makes sure everyone knows he goes to church, or the Christian that doesn't always go to church, but volunteers at the soup kitchen downtown and tells nobody?

      The Christian that goes to church every Sunday.

    17. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by jhoegl · · Score: 1

      Was it wrong to use someones fame to bring light on issues of the world? HIV/AIDS, smallpox, polleo, hunger
      Or would it be better to suffer in silence feeling like no one cares, because they dont ask and you dont tell?
      The Spotlight is a harsh mistress, and to put ones self on the line for a cause they believe in is more gutsy than not.
      It is still up to the individual, and I respect either way. But the way you write it, you would think the world should keep its mouth shut.

    18. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by jojoba_oil · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Who is better, the Christian that goes to church every Sunday and makes sure everyone knows he goes to church, or the Christian that doesn't always go to church, but volunteers at the soup kitchen downtown and tells nobody?

      I don't see how this comparison works. The fact that they they do/don't go to church has no bearing on the charitable service/money they provide, and you've not indicated whether the first guy does anything for charity. So in the context of a debate about charity, I don't have enough facts to determine which one is "better".

      What I can tell you is that the soup-kitchen guy is probably a criminal who is sentenced to a number of hours of community service... which is why he doesn't brag about it.

      Ok. Kidding aside, I don't see the obsession with people physically going and helping at soup kitchens. That's more of a selfish act than anything else. Go to work for another hour and donate an hour's worth of salary money to pay for multiple people to work at the soup kitchen.

    19. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Funny you mention that, cause I just had a big crysis in my toilet and it run like hell...

    20. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by nschubach · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not like there haven't been all kinds of methods devised for getting rid of waste. Hell, NASA probably researched a million different chemicals and methods for getting rid of such waste. I'm sure they didn't just blow all that money on a single toilet.

      Also, there no need for name calling. So I went a little wordy with my sentence... big deal.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    21. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by aric4ever · · Score: 1

      The problem is that there are literally no solutions in place for toilets in third world countries. So excrement is anywhere/everywhere. And since the classic western toilet is expensive and requires a lot of hookups/extras (treament facilties, running water, toilet paper, etc) they have been funding two projects. One is to build pit latrines and other facilities to contain it. The other is what to do with it when gathered.

      --
      The intelligence of any discussion diminishes with the square of the number of participants.-- Adam Walinsky
    22. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by operagost · · Score: 1

      "Take heed that you do not do your charitable deeds before men, to be seen by them. Otherwise you have no reward from your Father in heaven. Therefore, when you do a charitable deed, do not sound a trumpet before you as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have glory from men. Assuredly, I say to you, they have their reward. But when you do a charitable deed, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, that your charitable deed may be in secret; and your Father who sees in secret will Himself reward you openly." - Matthew 6

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    23. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by m50d · · Score: 1

      Nice job equating Christianity with goodness. But you missed a third option: the guy who keeps his activities secret, and doesn't actually do anything. Guess which one I think Jobs is most likely to be - this is the guy who runs a company that purports to be so egalitarian there are no named parking spaces, and then illegally parks in the disabled bays himself.

      --
      I am trolling
    24. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill Gates wants to get his Nobel Peace Prize at any cost.

    25. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by operagost · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      You have one twisted, disgruntled view of religion. Creating schools is a bad thing? Do you criticize all bumper stickers, or just the religious ones? Who cares about selling bibles?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    26. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

      The non-vocal person helping society does nothing for the hegemony of the church.

      Sure he does, if the people he is helping know he is with the church.

      But remember, it's not about the church, it's about taking care of other people because it's the right thing to do.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    27. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Moryath · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Some people use charity as a means of self-promotion.

      No kidding. Down here, we call them "republicans." They do meaningless or less-than-helpful things in the name of "charity" and spend 10x as much money advertising their "charity" as ever gets round to helping anyone.

      Case in point: the Joplin tornado. The Red Cross was doing donation drives, very carefully being sure to accept what was actually needed by the people who were trying to live day-to-day in the region, organizing trucks to ship it all, sending trained workers to help families rebuild and help clean up.

      Meanwhile, the Pee Tardy crowd started blasting the airwaves with advertising for the "TEA PARTY DONATION DRIVE FOR JOPLIN, SHOW YOUR CONSERVATIVE SPIRIT BY HELPING THESE POOR PEOPLE." Most of the crap that was "donated" is still sitting in a warehouse 10 miles from my house, because nobody in Joplin needed it and even fewer had any place to put it. A number of high-profile donated items "mysteriously vanished" and we've tracked them down to one of the local Pee Tardier leaders' house; after pictures of the items were taken over his fence, he built a bigger fence but has NEVER produced any purchase receipts.

      Who is better, the Christian that goes to church every Sunday and makes sure everyone knows he goes to church, or the Christian that doesn't always go to church, but volunteers at the soup kitchen downtown and tells nobody?

      I'll take either of them over (c): the bigoted, homophobic Pee Tardier who engages in illegal, unethical medical malpractice known to push people towards suicide.

      But remember, it's not about the church, it's about taking care of other people because it's the right thing to do.

      Indeed. If your "god" insists that I hate something/someone, your god can go fuck himself.

    28. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Pope · · Score: 2

      How amusing. Another story of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation that includes the obligatory Steve Jobs bash. Last I checked, Steve was running a very successful multi-billion dollar company full time. Maybe ask again when he's retired?

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    29. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Pope · · Score: 0

      No, but it's great for mining BitCoins!

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    30. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by abigor · · Score: 1

      Is that the best you can do? Making lame assumptions about Steve Jobs and getting mad because he parks where he feels like it? Why the hatred, anyway? It's just a technology company that sells its products to people who want them. Why not reserve your bile and revulsion for things that deserve it - dictators, mass murderers and desktop Linux?

    31. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by dyingtolive · · Score: 1

      Neither. One doesn't contribute to society, and the other doesn't set an example for others to follow. Publicly announcing acts of charity draws attention to the cause, and it says, "Hey, I'm rich and powerful, and I'm still doing these good works for others." Everyone wants to be like the rich/famous/powerful. If they didn't, there wouldn't be so many lower-middle class voting Republican. Or voting period, for that matter. He is trying to be something we're woefully lacking in this day and age: A Role-Model.

      I'm reasonably sure that the only thing Jobs has ever donated to was the Democratic Party election campaign fund. But that's more an investment than a donation.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    32. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by nschubach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If the small villages in Pakistan can figure out that they need to go to "x" location on the other side of the hill when they need to dump their waste, why can't someone in Africa designate an area that people will go to do that?

      Why do they need someone else to come in and dig a latrine for them? Do they lack the knowledge on digging a hole? ... building a stick/rope structure to hold up a person? Why is there really an issue with people squatting anywhere they damn well please in Africa if all the other places all over the world figured this out already? There are remote places all over the world that have figured out that this waste is bad and they work with it just fine. How is it any different in Africa? They don't know how to mix the feces with dirt and/or bury it?

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    33. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "Creating schools is a bad thing?"

      No, OTOH, creating schools that teach about talking snakes, is.

    34. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steve Jobs sees his charitable contributions as something he does for whatever reason. Bill Gates' job now is philanthropy and getting more people to invest to help groups.

      Gates is more like a priest/preacher/father/missionary/watever than a mere Christian to corrupt your analogy. He's not just announcing he is going to church, but trying to get more people to come. Steve Jobs is just showing up on Sunday for all practicalities. They have different motives and duties.

    35. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      So do what westerners did when they were poor and had no water and power. Outhouses with properly sized leach fields. I would imagine the folks who need these facilities don't own the land and so can't build such things. The people who do own the land have another place to potty.

    36. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      #1 is fine for home version. but for #2 (oops, sorry!) you need the ultimate version.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    37. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Coffee+Warlord · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, the real question is...how the hell will the three sea shells work?

    38. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Compost toilets require COMPOST, they might not have wood shavings or other such material available. If your compost toilet had only feces those were not earthworms wriggling in it.

    39. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by nschubach · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not sure where my joking starts or ends. Could you clarify where you think I'm joking?

      You've listed a solution that may work for them. Why hasn't this billion dollar fund heard of these toilets then? What sort of solution is Mr. Gates looking for if these compost solutions were not sufficient enough for his solution?

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    40. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Svartalf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Heh... No...don't need to do that... A composting toilet breaks it down and renders the hazardous bacterial aspects of it largely harmless over time- typically a shorter period than the bulk wastewater treatment systems take to do it.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    41. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      I think it'd be the complexity. You're going to have to extract the liquid from the waste to do that- and unless he's focusing on efficient water purification systems that don't require much or any power, that's not going to be happening.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    42. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      religion is not worthy of modern man's adoration or respect. its an anachronism and causes us to fight and war on each other. the sooner we rid ourselves of this delusional mythology, the better.

      I could never understand why belief in a sky wizard makes one a better person. I've never seen that in real life. never once.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    43. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      You're sort of conflating two things.

      A better question: who's better, the rich man who gives money to charity, takes tax breaks because of it, and makes sure everyone knows so he gets PR for himself and his company, increasing sales (i.e. the usual corporate "sponsorship" style charity) or the guy who gives money or volunteers and doesn't tell anyone?

      It seems to have become fashionable to put your volunteer experience on your resume, whether it's relevant to the job you're applying to or not. Or rather, it's become fashionable to volunteer SO you can put it on your resume (see? I'm a good person!). I volunteer, but I never put it on my resume unless it's relevant.

    44. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly, he's shilling for Kohler. There's always a conspiracy somewhere.

    45. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by russlar · · Score: 1

      After years of heading up a company that made shit, Gates is now heading up an initiative to improve the processing of shit.

      --
      Anybody want my mod points?
    46. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it keeps the pastors in control of your thought process that way.

    47. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by daveofnf · · Score: 1

      Well I think Jobs is probably working on the iPooed.

    48. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Tyr07 · · Score: 1

      I disagree, I think it's perfect fine that he advertises it. He should, partly because he'd come under a lot of scrutiny if people thought he didn't. Anyone else concerned with the political, social or other unimportant aspects (in my opinion) of it aren't really thinking about the people in less fortunate circumstances. People living in places without water and toliets really don't care if you think it's a social stunt, or just to advertise, or whatever the reason is. There only concern is receiving a better quality of life and they don't care why, they're just thankful for it. He can do it to recieve an award or a parade for all I care, as long as people get the help they need.

    49. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by bmo · · Score: 1

      Here in the Northeast US, self-promotion through charity is "unseemly" for the most part.

      There is one in my town who has his name plastered all over the place (Alan Shawn Feinstein) who tends to make it a requirement that his name be attached to things he donates to.

      Some people have a problem with this, up here. I do.

      I can see a way of doing promotion of a charity that you start but take away the self-promotion. Don't name it after yourself. You can insist the name of the charity be plastered all over the school it builds, but it won't be your name, it will be the name of the charity.

      --
      BMO

    50. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by daveofnf · · Score: 1

      The iPooeds Genius feature gives suggestions on what you should eat to make your next experience a better one.

    51. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why is there really an issue with people squatting anywhere they damn well please in Africa if all the other places all over the world figured this out already? There are remote places all over the world that have figured out that this waste is bad and they work with it just fine. How is it any different in Africa? They don't know how to mix the feces with dirt and/or bury it?

      This was my first reaction too---
      Step #1 - Dig a hole
      Step #2 - Place outhouse over hole

      Every month or two...
      Step #1 - Temp. move outhouse
      Step #2 - Dig new hole, placing dirt in old hole
      Step #3 - Please outhouse over new hole, mark old hole so as not to dig there for a while

      Then just make sure you aren't placing your outhouse holes somewhere that they contaminate your water supply (well), garden, etc...

      But, I'm guessing there must be some reasons they don't do this... maybe--
      - Population density? Too many poeple in a small area?
      - Soil issues? Maybe the soil consistency or water supply dynamics make it impossible to locate an outhouse hole close enough to be practical?
      - Lack of tools? Maybe things like shovels, hammers, etc are too scarce? Tho it seems like a larger supply of these items would be easier/cheaper to provide then new toilets...
      - Lack of knowledge/intelligence? Maybe Bill thinks African's are not intelligent enough to be able to learn, implement and pass-on this type of knowledge... I'm kidding of course, but it is odd...

      I know it's somewhat cruel and elitist, but I often can't understand the dynamics of these places in Africa... if you have these millions of desperately starving children, WHY do they keep having children?? And, if "we", the outside world, keep providing food don't we realize that we're just creating an unmanageable problem? If you have 10M people that can't feed themselves, so you feel sorry and give them food, you'll just end up with 20M that can't feed themselves on the budget of 10M persons worth of food you provide... thus you must provide even more food...

      Give a man a fish, feed him for a day... teach a man to fish, feed him forever. In this case our compassion to save millions of starving people will only serve to create TENS of million of future starving people........unless the dynamic there radically changes... but considering most of those commercials I see on TV show kids who are wearing loin cloths and lying in the dirt, it seems like there is a huge learning and cultural curve to overcome...

    52. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by daveofnf · · Score: 1

      What would social networking be like? Assbook? Fartter?

      Sorry for the potty jokes, but I can't help myself.

    53. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      I think the obsession comes from the benefit people derive from interacting with those less fortunate.

      Jesus could have been more efficient if he spent his time raising rich people from the dead for cash and selling loaves and fishes. Then he could have paid for dozens of people to die on crosses and stuff.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    54. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      I'm just curious how someone will find a way to spin this as a bad thing. Will it be "Gates will probably insist they use only Windows toilets!"? Or maybe it will be "This is just a ploy for him to sell more Windows copies to the poor people after they take a shit!" Or perhaps "I'll be he'll ban Linux and Apple from these shithouses!"

      Come on, I know there are plenty of Slashdotters just ACHING to find SOME way, ANY way to bash him some more. Forget that Steve Jobs does NO charitable activities (Steve don't do charity) or that this has nothing to do with Linux. Someone will find a way. He's the guy with the Borg picture, after all.

      Everything Bill touches turns to shit, so a toilet is appropriate.

      or....

      BSOD=Brown Spray of Death.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    55. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1

      Who is better, the Christian that goes to church every Sunday and makes sure everyone knows he goes to church, or the Christian that doesn't always go to church, but volunteers at the soup kitchen downtown and tells nobody?

      The Christian that realises Christianity is delusional and devotes the rest of his life to promoting critical thinking and rationality in his fellow man. ...And still volunteers in the soup kitchen after realising altruism is an intrinsic property of the human psyche, not an extrinsic edict from a supernatural entity.

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    56. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Like many people who have never left their prosperous western country, you should visit a place like west Africa. The issue has less to do with what you sit on than the logistics of disposing of waste in an area that often has no working plumbing and the streets have open sewers. Not to mention the prohibitive cost of supply chemicals and equipment to millions of people who care more about how to get some money today than where there feces wind up.

    57. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 1

      The crappy blue screen joke in the summary wasn't enough for ya?

      --
      I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
    58. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by snemarch · · Score: 0

      If I had any mod points left, you would be getting them :)

      --
      Coffee-driven development.
    59. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I know it's somewhat cruel and elitist, but I often can't understand the dynamics of these places in Africa... if you have these millions of desperately starving children, WHY do they keep having children?? And, if "we", the outside world, keep providing food don't we realize that we're just creating an unmanageable problem? If you have 10M people that can't feed themselves, so you feel sorry and give them food, you'll just end up with 20M that can't feed themselves on the budget of 10M persons worth of food you provide... thus you must provide even more food...

      Way to misunderstand the problem. Women in these places have little to no education and often do not have control over their own lives. This means they are raped, forced to marry or have children and since many of those die they have enough to ensure some survive. If you deprived them of food the same problem would exist. The real solution is improving their lives via education and infrastructure.

    60. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by wiedzmin · · Score: 2

      "Your toilet has performed an illegal operation and will be closed. Please remove all poop and reload it again to continue."

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    61. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by bmo · · Score: 1

      I said I'm a lapsed Episcopal back there. I don't have much faith. I don't think I have any left. But that's one of the most insightful quotes out of the Bible.

      And it's marked overrated. Yeah, welcome to Slashdot.

      --
      BMO

    62. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Moryath · · Score: 2

      You're going to have to extract the liquid from the waste to do that- and unless he's focusing on efficient water purification systems that don't require much or any power, that's not going to be happening.

      Like I said. Let gravity filter the waste - liquid goes through, solid catches in a trap of some kind (removable bucket? Flip-to-clear lid?). Put a crank in the right spot, hand-pump enough liquid into a reservoir for a flush, and the system can be more or less closed until it's time to refresh the water cleaning chemicals or empty the solid waste catch.

    63. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations. Your post is one of the most idiotic posts I've ever read in my life.

      No part of the story you just said was "self promotion." They called out on Tea Partiers (who are, in fact, more charitable than your average person) to donate, and apparently they did. And you spin this against them? Just because there happens to be another organization who has more experience and apparently did a more efficient job. Oh no. They donated things that weren't needed! They are horrible people!

      "high-profile donated items" What the heck does that mean? What were people donating other than supplies and food? I call BS. I'd build higher fences as well if people were spying on me through a fence. I hope whoever took those pictures was prosecuted.

      Michele Bachmann owns a part of a clinic that apparently did something as explained in a video created by "Truth Wins Out, a gay advocacy group that has worked to discredit so-called 'ex-gay therapy.'" Sounds credible and unbiased and unedited. I'm sure. You are far crazier than what you claim Tea Partiers are. Convenient that this video emerged right as she was coming out as a presidential hopeful. I'm sure it had nothing to do with per candidacy, and was fully just "to discredit so-called 'ex-gay therapy.'"

    64. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by hey! · · Score: 2

      I'm just trying to figure out why he wants to violate the KISS methodology. You have few options for feces. Put it it into a treatment facility (flush, carry...) to be treated with bacteria that live on that sort of thing, use it for fertilizer or burn it.

      That's only simple for you, the homeowner, because somebody has invested HUGE amounts of money and engineering into infrastructure that makes it possible. Think about it. You take water that has been purified to drinking water standards and moved tthrough a water distribution system, often hundreds of miles. You shit in that drinking water and send it through a separate water collection system, where the shit you put into it is removed and processed and the water treated AGAIN before being dumped in the environment.

      That's what you call simple?

      Let me tell what's simple: a composting toilet like a Clivus Multrum. My wife's beatnik (proto-hippie) architect uncle had one in his remodeled 17th C farmhouse. You put your waste (including food scraps) in the hole, along with an occasional handful of sawdust. Electric fans (sometimes solar powered) encourage non-smelly aerobic decomposition and prevent the collection of odors. The waste slides down an inclined plane where it emerges as rich, unsmelly compost a few months later. It's not much more mechanically complicated than the infrastructure you need in your house for a flush toilet. You don't even need running water. It's a *hell* of a lot simpler than the whole infrastructure you need to do it the first world way. And cheaper too. A sewage treatment plant for a major city costs *billions* to build, not including the water and sewer networks and installing plumbing in everyone's house.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    65. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      They already have something.

      http://www.biobagusa.com/portable-camping-toilets.html

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    66. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When will people learn that you don't make money when you give to charity? The money that you donate just isn't taxed. It's not like you magically make more money than you donated. Please stop using this ridiculous argument.

      As to your point, it's clear that Gates doesn't donate to promote himself. He promotes *his charity* so that others will donate as well, and he has been very successful at getting other very wealthy people do donate a lot of money.

    67. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jobs just donated $100M to a hospital a few months ago.

      Oh wait, he asked that his name not be put on the building and asked that his name not be put in the marketing materials. He was at the ribbon cutting, but didn't participate in the ceremony officially...and while no one has said he was the one that provided the $$$, there was no previous cash available for the project, no public funding drive nor anyone else that had this sort of money to give involved.

      I also know Apple has donated to my own charity in the past...both in equipment and monitary...they asked that I not include them on the thanks, nor to give the info of the person in charge...they choose who to give to and don't take solicitation. Thus this is anonymous. I don't have anything to do with the company or the previous charity...I'm just appreciative and glad that Apple supports the causes they choose -- not just whatever gets the most PR. For the record, GF has also given my charity money...they didn't ask for banners or otherwise either...I may not like M$, but if Bill can do good work with the money he earned from the company, it changes everything about my impression of the company...so no microsoft slam just because I'm supporting Jobs as well...

    68. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by thelowedown · · Score: 1

      Yes, religion is the only thing that ever started a war or fight. I think you are delusional---and ignorant.

    69. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by nschubach · · Score: 2

      No, I consider simple being a hole in the ground with a place to sit above it. I grew up on a Midwestern farm and we had an outhouse that was no longer used by us... but I understood it's purpose. I even went camping, a lot, as a kid and had to dig holes where I would bury my waste. It's not something I needed a degree in biology or waste management to understand.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    70. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by WilliamGeorge · · Score: 1

      Matthew 6:1-4 is applicable to your question:

      1“Beware of practicing your righteousness before men to be noticed by them; otherwise you have no reward with your Father who is in heaven. 2“So when you give to the poor, do not sound a trumpet before you, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, so that they may be honored by men. Truly I say to you, they have their reward in full. 3“But when you give to the poor, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, 4so that your giving will be in secret; and your Father who sees what is done in secret will reward you.

      However, with that said, I don't think Bill Gates is doing this for his own gain or recognition. He seems more interested in using his name to attract attention to the charitable causes, rather than the inverse. Many of the things his foundation champions are fantastic, and I much prefer the idea of private individuals doing this sort of thing instead of the government (who have better things to worry about).

      --
      William George
    71. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2

      >> It should read "Bill Gates looks to give money to people to invent a new toilet".

      or

      "Bill Gates Puts Money Into Toilet"

    72. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According the Catholics, no matter how good you are, if you don't attend Church weekly, you're going to hell.

    73. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Jiro · · Score: 1

      Jesus didn't die on a cross because he thought the number of people who die on crosses needed to be increased. He did (at least according to the story) because redeeming sins by dying on the cross was only something he could do.

      If you have a unique skill (as Jesus does in the Jesus story) and want to use it to help people, by all means use it. Dying for people's sins cannot be bought with an extra hours salary. Food for the homeless can.

    74. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by dyingtolive · · Score: 1

      -1 Failing to realize that Republicans aren't the problem: Republicans AND DEMOCRATS (really, Two-party systems in general) are.
      -1 Rant disguised as content.
      -1 "Pee Tardy"? Seriously? We really are regressing as a race, aren't we? That shit's something I'd expect a 10 year old to come up with, and we're not talking the clever 10 year olds here.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    75. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he's seeing the same shit we're seeing from the ReTHUGlicans in my town, OP's not lying. He may even be sanitizing it a bit.

      We had one of those "Tea Party Donation Drives" here too. A local businessman who runs a hardware store donated a bunch of large charcoal pit grills that he claimed were intended for "people who need to cook and may not have gas or electricity for a while." The grills showed up later that month at a "Tea Party Fundraiser" for a set of their candidates for the primaries, cooking the $2 hotdogs instead.

      Michele Bachmann runs a set of "clinics" that provide "therapy" which is unapproved by any licensed medical agency, that fails to get proper consent forms and provide enough information that anyone could claim the "therapies" are entered into with informed consent. And since this information has come out, what have you ReTHUGlicans been doing? Oh yeah, what you do every time, attack the messenger.

      Sadly for you it's not just "Truth Wins Out" - more and more of the patients Bachmann's unethical, evil husband has abused are coming forward.

    76. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How amusing. Another story of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation that includes the obligatory Steve Jobs bash.

      Last I checked, Steve was running a very successful multi-billion dollar company full time. Maybe ask again when he's retired?

      Or ask his many high ranked, 30 year employees who had heart attacks, ulcers, and panic attacks due to his gratuitous cruelty. The few who knew him on a personal level since the beginning and know him now. They might have an idea.

    77. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      primary reason, yes, it is. more fighting happens because your_god != my_god.

      why deny that? you are the delusional one if you refuse to admit the blood on religion's hands across the centuries.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    78. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      That's just your Calvinism manifesting itself. Don't worry about it, it's only mildly pathological.

    79. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you deprived them of food the same problem would exist.

      Not if you do it effectively enough.

    80. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Steve Jobs may or may not do charity. It's really his business, isn't it?

      Selling coke isn't an act of charity. I'm pretty libertarian about the 'war on drugs' thing, so I agree it's nobody else's business, really.

      It could be an act of charity, but as far as anybody can tell, he dealt coke mainly to his peers, not to poor people at a reduced price.

    81. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for lack of mod points, i offer you this good job

    82. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Jobs' recent success has been at selling pop culture stuff.

      What was that thing he said to Scully about spending the rest of his life selling sugar water?

      Not that the Steve has a very long 'rest of his life' to worry about. Unless he can keep budding in line for organ transplants, of course....
       

    83. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trick question... There is no such thing as a good Christian...

    84. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Jesus could have been more efficient if he spent his time raising rich people from the dead for cash and selling loaves and fishes. Then he could have paid for dozens of people to die on crosses and stuff.

      1) I don't think efficiency or more people dying on crosses is what he was aiming for.
      2) There were probably dozens of people who died on crosses. Jesus is the one whose name at least a billion people know of.

      --
    85. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      So, the first version was called Windows, and this one is going to be called Toilets. His naming scheme really sucks.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    86. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Aww give Steve a break. He's likely to be one of those with congenital absence of conscience. Or a malformed/defective one.

      That's why he gets to park at those bays.

      --
    87. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking that this project has the goal of coming up with a better system than the traditional one in modern cities to both lower the cost of construction/maintenance and the water usage. While there are alternatives like the dry toilet bags I've seen, they don't scale well to a city size population.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    88. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People shouldn't have to make their contributions public in order to prevent them from being judged as "non-charitable". If you don't have information, you don't know. People around here should know the difference between a NULL and a 0.

    89. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Who do you think turned Steve into the bitter so-and-so he is today? I mean being raped by the Borg changes you. Just because the Borg are using their ill gotten gain to do altruistic things doesn't change their origins. I mean much of Steve's current business philosophy came directly from the Borg playbook (Not RIMs).

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    90. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, couldn't help it.

      http://www.zdnet.com/photos/photos-seven-of-microsofts-hardware-hits-and-misses/10526?seq=7

    91. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn him for helping to make PCs accessible to all. Damn him!

    92. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by tyrione · · Score: 1

      I love the fact that you could have said "I'm just trying to figure out why he wants to violate the KISS methodology" in fewer words such as "Why is he trying to complicate things?". Twit.

      Anyway, he's not. The design process might be more complex; but be sure it will lead to a simple, elegant solution; and not more complex. It has to be cheap to produce and easy to maintain; while being just as sanitary and using less water than the current (pretty complex) flushing toilet. For example, a method for digging deeper dunny holes might be one solution.

      ``Things'' doesn't improve matters. To be more concise I would have said, ``What happened to KISS?''

    93. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Polleo? Is that some spanish chicken thing?

    94. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by ashidosan · · Score: 1

      It's only insightful if you think admittance to Heaven is your reward for being altruistic.

    95. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by hey! · · Score: 2

      OK, let's take your dig a hole in the ground routine and apply to a city like Dhaka, Bangladesh, with a population density of 118,000 per square mile. Let's stipulate that part of the job is keeping diseases like cholera from spreading. "Simple" only counts as a virtue if it gets the job done.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    96. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Bible says that no sinner will enter the kingdom of heaven/God. In order to qualify for that, we would have to be perfect... literally.

      Obviously there is no one that qualifies for that. But that's where Jesus comes in, because he lived out the law of the scriptures and torah *perfectly* to the very period. Every aspect, every trait, every characteristic, every element, every little tiny thing possibly imaginable about his life was lived *perfectly*.

      Just think about it: no matter how you try to squash down on things that you think are flaws, every time you succeed in one spot some other spot somewhere else comes back up. It is like a balloon filled with water; when you try to flatten the balloon one end is always going to pop out from beneath or through your hands. And just simply, how can we prevent ourselves flawlessly from all wrong? You can't, nobody can. Only Jesus has succeeded in what we cannot.

      Would we be living in old testament days, it would be a PITA to redeem ourselves to God and have salvation -- because it came through the Law and things like animal sacrifices. There was a lot between man and God distance-wise because of the Law.

      But because of Jesus dying on the cross, being the perfect lamb that we could never and can't be, it is no longer by law one may redeem themselves and find favor from God. It is through Jesus' perfection that a person is free. The purpose of the Law is to remind of us of our sin, ignorance, arrogance, stubbornness, hate, lust, etcetera. That is the only purpose the Law serves now. It is important to realize that ONLY through Jesus' we are free and perfect (no, not our bodies as they are merely vessels in this world that God has given us to use for His glory, but our spiritual-side) and that we can do and are NOTHING.

      Lord Jesus Christ reduced the 10 commandments down to only just 2 commandments (so just focus on this): Love the Lord God with all your heart and love your neighbor as yourself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets. [Matthew 22:34-40]

      Now this is your part: you need to ask and figure out what it means to love your neighbor as yourself.

      That's the lynchpin of the Christian lifestyle: selflessness.

    97. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by mellon · · Score: 1

      The frustrating thing here is that there's a lot of old tech that solves this problem, but it's not sexy. It's good that Gates is publicizing this stuff; I hope he doesn't invent some new plastic monstrosity to solve the problem, though.

      My Buddhist group built a retreat center on the quick last year, and one of the problems we had was insufficient sewer capacity (sewer systems and septic systems are expensive and sometimes difficult to install). The way we solved the problem was *extremely* low tech: we built outhouses with two leakproof basins with a lot of capacity.

      The end-user uses one of the two basins exclusively for several months, dumping a bit of cellulose (grass or wood shavings) in afterwards. When it gets full, the user switches to the other basin, leaving the first basin to compost for several months. When that one's full, the compost in the other one is ready, and can be dug out and used to fertilize soil. We tested this extensively to make sure that it was safe, and it is; there's no fecal coliform bacteria in the compost.

      This kind of system is probably $10k or more cheaper than the next cheapest alternative. Making it work for public toilets would be more difficult, because the volumes are higher, but I think it would still be doable. There are commercial composting toilets that use an electrically driven drum to turn the compost, so that you don't have to have a two-seater, but this solution is much less expensive, and much easier to build.

    98. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      Jesus didn't die on a cross because he thought the number of people who die on crosses needed to be increased. He did (at least according to the story) because redeeming sins by dying on the cross was only something he could do.

      I may be wrong, but I believe it was not his idea to die on the cross.

    99. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2

      I'm an atheist, but: it's simply not true.

      Wars are generally fought for resources, especially land. "Religion" is just one of the features by which different ethnos and cultures differentiate themselves from each other. When there is no conflict over resources, religions seldom fight. When two different power-groups/ethnicities/polities are struggling over a resource, religion seldom matters.

      The Nazis were generally Christian (both Protestant and Catholic) and invaded Christian countries. Some of the most violent wars of the 19th century were fought in Latin America with Catholics on all sides (the War of the Triple Alliance killed about 90% of Paraguay's male population.) Religion was not a factor in Japan's Imperial expansion - they weren't trying to convert anyone to Shintoism, even if state Shintoism was used as a way of reinforcing national identity.

      Your mistake is that you think that religion has always been separate from culture and politics: the idea of "a religion" as something distinct is a recent one, so in pre-modern conflict - the expansion of Islam, for example - you might think that "religion" was the motivation. It seldom was.

    100. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither. 'better' is a subjective term and it will depend on the pov of the person viewing the act.

      Personally i think you're all a bunch of douchebags and i'm 'better' than all of you. You and your invisible undead skywizards who keep telling you to tell everyone else what the fuck they should be doing with their lives, when it's NONE OF YOUR DAMM BUSINESS.

      Religon. Done more damage to the planet and human race than anything ever will.

    101. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by morgauxo · · Score: 1

      What's the point you are trying to make? It's wrong to bash an old billionaire who is using his money for something good when in his younger years he obtained that money through all sorts of unethical means and generally made the world a worse place?

    102. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by morgauxo · · Score: 1

      Jobs doesn't do charity because he is unwilling to admit to himself that he is getting old and will die some day. Gates knows full well and is hedging his bets. Both receive and deserve all the bashing they can get.

    103. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

      mmm... overpopulation. once we fix sanitation, another nasty side effect of unregulated breeding will take its place...

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    104. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are fined 1 Credit for a violation of the Verbal Morality Statute.

    105. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by DrMaurer · · Score: 1

      False dichotomy. Straw man. Whatever. Gates isn't just a Christian going to church and doing nothing, nor is he taking the idea of working tirelessly in the background for little change seriously. He's making the most change that he can and driving results. It might not be my business what Steve Jobs supports, but he's not being a good supporter if he isn't doing more (if he can being, admittedly, sick and all) to bring more awareness to his issues.

      Bill Gates is performing charity and telling people what he's doing. If you have someone with the public face backing that up with cash, that's huge. Better him that who? Bono. What?

      Maybe he changed. I mean, what is he gonna do next, realistically, besides give his fortune away? Run for president? What a waste for little return on investment.

      Still not a fan of what he did to get where he is, but...

      --
      Dan
    106. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by ZackSchil · · Score: 2

      They stopped producing music that appealed to the current youth.

    107. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by JabberWokky · · Score: 1

      Wow. In protest of people making jackass assumptions and generalizations about somebody who they barely know and who won't ever hear their complaining, you're making jackass assumptions and generalizations directly to a mass of rather diverse people.

      There will be dumb jokes (there's one in the summary already) and even some bitterness; this is an IT heavy crowd. But if you really don't like it, there's no reason to contribute to the hostility. Unless you're simply looking to feel good about being a martyr for the underdog... in which case, you're simply engaged in emotional self-aggrandizement and a pitiable plea for abuse to maintain your self-image. In the end, your comment is not about Gates, nor (unless you are very socially deaf) is it intended to actually change minds. It is as hostile as the hostility you are claiming to loathe.

      A strange comment, either a troll or a person lacking perspective.

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    108. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      NASA had the advantage in that their methods had to be efficient when used, but still very expensive to manufacture and maintain. What he needs in this case is something that can be cheaply implemented and not wasting any more resources than needed when used.

    109. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Women do not have access to birth control, are not educated or there is cultural pressure on either gender not to use it. (Higher education tends to lead to lower birth rates.)

      2. All that free food flowing into the country makes it difficult for farmers (those that remain) to compete. Those controlling the food inflow are in positions of power.

    110. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anything Gates does is tainted by his foundation's unethical investing: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-gatesx07jan07,0,4205044,full.story

    111. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      He didn't ask why women keep having children, he asked why "they" (which would presumably include males as well) keep having children. It takes two to have children, you know. If neither wanted it, they wouldn't have any. If women aren't even asked, then maybe it makes sense for propaganda to target men first. It'll make a difference faster than trying to change the deeply ingrained social structure.

    112. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Forcibly attaching your name to your acts of charity is a form of vanity, but as far as society goes, it is a harmless one, while the good that gets done is quite real.

    113. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I think Muslims got it better - zakat is a universal tax, so the fact that you give out to charity does not make you unique - everyone does that. Some may do it grudgingly, but since no-one would normally admit to that, it's easier to pretend that all are equal in that regard.

    114. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by nschubach · · Score: 1

      So, Bill Gates comes in and installs plumbing and toilets in every home... building up the infrastructure and leaves. Everything should be cool, right? I mean, they'll wake up to the overpopulation problem and control their population?

      No. They'll likely just use the facilities, not do anything to upkeep or repair them and continue down the road they are in right now. They'll beat their neighbor for access to their restrooms and when that one breaks? Start crapping in their vegetable gardens again.

      Now, I don't know if that's the real conditions over there, but providing waste treatment for a city that has other social/economic issues in play is not going to resolve their problems overnight. At best, it's a band-aid fix.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    115. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by nschubach · · Score: 1

      It's all fine and grand, but most of the places in Africa already lack the social order required to maintain such systems. Building it would be a temporary fix to the real problems. It actually may make things worse if a neighboring warlord decides that those facilities should be theirs to use.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    116. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by scottrocket · · Score: 1
      "No, the real question is...how the hell will the three sea shells work?"

      Meh, just cuss a few times, then you'll be good to go.

    117. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by treeves · · Score: 1

      Wrong. The answer is "you can't tell from the information given." Although the "makes sure everyone knows he goes" makes him sound Pharisaical and prideful which is evidence against him.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    118. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by treeves · · Score: 1

      What, so he can join Arafat and Obama? I doubt it.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    119. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by darkgrayknight · · Score: 1

      It was His idea, not that he liked it. He would have preferred another method, but there was no other way to redeem humankind.

    120. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      Think "recycle bin"...

      ewwwww.....

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    121. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Reproduce is what people without televisions do for fun.

      Instead of food we should be dropping off televisions. Soon the Sub-Sahara will be thinly populated with henpecked lard asses and bitchy women.

    122. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Man, you guys are nuts. The Tea Party is trying to save you from a huge government about to take regulate every thing you do (including sex) and all you can do, is fight the very people who TRULY have the interest of gay people at heart. Gay Marriage would not be an issue, if states were able to decide what was marriage instead of having the federal government make the final and only determination... let the states have at it as they will.

      Voting for smaller government is a vote for freedom, whatever your interest are.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    123. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by citizenr · · Score: 1

      The real solution is improving their lives via education and infrastructure.

      or sterilize them, works for stray cats/dogs

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    124. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by schlachter · · Score: 1

      You can use windows for your toilet, but it gets messy at street level.

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    125. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by myth24601 · · Score: 1

      I thought most people here kept a text file on standby with stuff they could copy and paste into any story about Gates or MS.

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
    126. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know how to read because it was decided many years ago that it was good for commoners to be literate so they could read the Bible.

      You can poo-poo religion all you want, but I bet that you live in a predominantly Protestant nation. I doubt you would elect to live anywhere else.

      I will go ahead and reply to your tropical paradise reply now, while Im here: Not unless you could take your Western-Protestant wealth with you or have a way out.

      Fear of God is the beginning of knowledge.

    127. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr Hankey will not be happy. ;)

    128. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by syousef · · Score: 1

      Who is better, the Christian that goes to church every Sunday and makes sure everyone knows he goes to church, or the Christian that doesn't always go to church, but volunteers at the soup kitchen downtown and tells nobody?

      Neither! Everyone knows the Flying Spaghetti Monster is the one true god.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    129. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Moryath · · Score: 1

      Man, you guys are nuts. The Tea Party is trying to save you from a huge government about to take regulate every thing you do (including sex) and all you can do, is fight the very people who TRULY have the interest of gay people at heart. Gay Marriage would not be an issue, if states were able to decide what was marriage instead of having the federal government make the final and only determination... let the states have at it as they will.

      Voting for smaller government is a vote for freedom, whatever your interest are.

      ..... wow.

      Michele Bachmann, aka Homophobe Barbie who runs around trumpeting the "need for a Federal Marriage Amendment", is the preeminent Tea Party candidate currently and you claim the Tea Party is the right place for gays to vote in order to support gay rights?

      Maybe we should ask the Texans about their right to talk with their doctors in the privacy of the examination room? The disgusting "sonogram bill" that says your doctor can be punished if he doesn't say certain legislatively demanded things, even if he finds them to be medically inaccurate or worse, was put forth by... wait for it... the leader of the "Texas Tea Party Caucus" in the Texas legislature.

      It was the predecessors of the Tea Party types who were responsible for anti-sodomy laws, which the Supreme Court dutifully struck down, and you want me to believe that the "Tea Party" groups won't try to pass something like that again?

      I mean really just... wow. I am in awe at the willful cognitive dissonance required to even formulate the blatantly dishonest claims that you put forth. Should we go back to letting "the states" decide to have miscegenation laws too?

    130. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both of you are wrong. Bill Gates is an atheist and one who is putting his mind and money to solving a real problem. Well done.

    131. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by crutchy · · Score: 1

      he'll put a window in each toilet, but will charge a tax for using said window. also, each user will have to sign a eula stating that they will not try to copy said window. then someone will come along and make a toilet with a hole to look out and will share the idea accompanied by a license requiring anyone who modifies/redistributes said hole is required to license in same manner. then some guy in a black skivvy comes along and offers apples but only if you use his toilet, which is pink and has a wireless flushing device. original window toilet maker complains that people are shitting all over his windows. toilets with holes have no problem because shit goes through hole without leaving any mess (often hitting toilet with window after passing through). window toilet maker then complains that its not fair that he can't put holes in his window to allow shit to pass through becasue then he would have to share his holey window per the eula for hole, so he abandons making toilets altogether and starts a software company.

    132. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mentioned 2 tea partiers and tea party predecessors. How about actually talking about the people as a whole that you claim to be talking about?

    133. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SJ might be doing some charity. Almost everyone is. Bill G is dedicating his life and 100% of his resources to charity. He could be doubling his fortune (we all know that would happen if he was back to Microsoft) but instead he's spending 100% of his time and all his money on helping people in need.
      That's quite different from self promotion. Which by the way is what SJ does 100% of the time, just not with charity.

    134. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Zomalaja · · Score: 1

      As unwell as Steve Jobs obviously is, that's a ludicrous comment.

    135. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding me? Steve Jobs does not and has never given a dime to charity. This is the same guy who denied his own child for many years.

      The guy is simply a self-centred douchebag.

    136. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Moryath · · Score: 1

      I mentioned their LEADERS. If they don't speak for the Tea Party movement and serve as examples of the whole, who does?

    137. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by the_y_the · · Score: 1

      ... if you have these millions of desperately starving children, WHY do they keep having children??

      It's precisely because kids have high mortality rates, that the birth rates are so high. One of the main reasons that high infant mortality rates lead to high birth rates is that people in these countries usually depend on their children to look after them when they are older, so in order to make sure that at least some children survive, they tend to have many. In essence it is about security.

      The other reason is of course stigma associated with using birth control or other forms of contraceptive devices, e.g. the whole controversy of using condoms due to religious reasons.

    138. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by bmo · · Score: 1

      Or you could simply take it as someone who truly gives of himself is a person who doesn't lord it over other people and say "look at me" all the time.

      If you are self aggrandizing through charity, you are not giving. You are purchasing notoriety.

      --
      BMO

    139. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by promythyus · · Score: 1

      So then you would say that religion has never started a war or fight? Exactly. Just imagine how different the middle east would be if they weren't fighting over "god said this is MY land" "no, god said this is MY land" (massive simplification but whatever.) Admittedly, people who just want to kill each other will find another reason.

    140. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by DrStoooopid · · Score: 1

      I always knew that Windows was sh*tty....but this is ridiculous!

      --
      There are 2 groups of people you can make fun of on the Internet without fear of attack. The illiterate, and the Amish.
    141. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Dexter+Herbivore · · Score: 1

      ...a method for digging deeper dunny holes might be one solution.

      Does anyone want to play "Spot the Aussie"?

    142. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hitler did this.

    143. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by splashbot · · Score: 1

      Not over-population, It's under-infrastructure, no-education. There are enough resources in the world to support everyone, they just aren't supporting themselves properly. This is due to their history, culture, etc. Also the fact that they would rather take loans from rich countries than try and spend the little they had on infrastructure and education. Its surely corrupt at some places in some governments as well.

    144. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I *never* got how the three sea shells worked. Does anyone know? im just curious.

    145. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And so is Steve - at best/worst, he's an agnostic!

    146. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by mm4 · · Score: 1

      Well, if the Other guy did it it would probably have a big blue Like button...

    147. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by conscarcdr · · Score: 1

      Can't you see Steve and his followers are too cool to do charity?

    148. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by JosKarith · · Score: 1

      If you have a refugee camp of 380,000 people ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dadaab ) then "location on the other side of the hill" is a slightly trickier logistical issue than you are painting it.

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    149. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      this one is going to be called Toilets. His naming scheme really flushes.

      FTFY

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    150. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by arisvega · · Score: 1

      Will it be "Gates will probably insist they use only Windows toilets!"?

      I habitually stick all the windows-related sticker crap that comes with new hardware to my house appliances like the toaster, microwave, blender etc. The "Windows Vista" one, I reserved it for the toiled bowl flush.

      A short while after I did this, it stopped working properly.

      --
      The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
    151. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by tabrnaker · · Score: 1

      The Bible says that no sinner will enter the kingdom of heaven/God. In order to qualify for that, we would have to be perfect... literally.

      Obviously there is no one that qualifies for that. But that's where Jesus comes in, because he lived out the law of the scriptures and torah *perfectly* to the very period. Every aspect, every trait, every characteristic, every element, every little tiny thing possibly imaginable about his life was lived *perfectly*.

      Except that Jesus didn't follow the law perfectly. If he was without sin, why did he not pick up stones and stone the person as the law demanded?

      The purpose of the Law is to remind of us of our sin, ignorance, arrogance, stubbornness, hate, lust, etcetera. That is the only purpose the Law serves now. It is important to realize that ONLY through Jesus' we are free and perfect (no, not our bodies as they are merely vessels in this world that God has given us to use for His glory, but our spiritual-side) and that we can do and are NOTHING.

      Verily, verily, I say to you, he who is believing in me, the works that I do -- that one also shall do, and greater than these he shall do, because I go on to my Father

      Follow the Tao you become the Tao.

    152. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a chill pill man. Here, this one is shaped like an apple with a bite taken out of it. Trust me, it's safe.

      Apple fanboy here but Bill is doing good with his time.

    153. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by tabrnaker · · Score: 1
      and about the ninth hour Jesus cried out with a great voice, saying, 'Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani?' that is, 'My God, my God, why didst Thou forsake(forget) me?'

      My God! my God! to what sort of persons hast thou left me?

      Ad quid dereliquisti me? "To what hast thou abandoned me?

      Take your pick. Jesus only choose to follow god, it was god's plan though.

    154. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by MWYankee · · Score: 1

      Taking your example, that's 236 square feet per person. I have been living with no public utilities or water well for 6 years. After figuring how I was going to deal with my water and sewer works on paper I discovered most problems go away with the water. For example, when civilized I took 15 gal showers. I now take 1/2 gal showers and get just as clean. I don't have a water heater ... I have a saucepan on the stove,. I don't have a flush toilet. I have a post hole digger. About once a month I dig a 6" diameter hole 4' deep. And I deposit my waste in it. I have a metal plate I cover it with. In six years I've appropriated an estimated 16 square feet to this purpose and have redug all parts of it at least twice being careful to allow enough time for nature to do its work. No odor. No flies. No water. No hassle. My proposal for Gates is to buy them all posthole diggers ... less than $20 each. Back to your example, that leaves 220 square feet per person to do whatever else they need to do.

    155. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being the eugenicist that he is, Gates will not likely put this into production until he finds a way to sterilize the person using the thing. Hence their carbon footprint will be removed from this earth shortly (just like he does with the GMO food he sends over via the Gates foundation) and the sterilizing vaccines he promotes in 3rd world counties with his good bud Warren Buffet.

    156. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

      There are enough resources in the world to support everyone?

      Oh really? For how long? Indefinite population expansion, or when everyone has exactly one square meter to stand in?

      Think about your answer a little more, son.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    157. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymus · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to spin it as a bad thing, I think almost any charity is great. You can say a lot of bad things about the first half of Gates' life, but at least he seems to be trying to do right at this point. I do have a couple of thoughts that might come across as negative though.

      First, will this entire system be run by Kenyans, trained for the task, or will this be yet another area where they're totally dependent on outside funding, ready to crumble to the ground once it dries up? Unless this system ends up completely in the hands of a capable native population, it's just like a large-scale version of food drops. That is, fantastic today, but when the drop doesn't arrive tomorrow they're back to starving. Also, when things are just provided, it disrupts local sustainable efforts to do the same thing. Unless this sanitation system also includes building local universities that provide adequate training in all associated technologies (repairmen, managers, engineers, security, etc), this will just be offensive and useless in 10 years.

      Second, there are hundreds of charities that can and do drop $10 million on large projects. There are hundreds of -individuals- in the US alone that can afford that. Between Buffet and Gates, they're sitting on over EIGHTY BILLION DOLLARS. Why not focus attention on billion-dollar-sized projects that are beyond the scope of any organization in the world (outside of major governments)? 80 billion dollars produces over a million dollars per day in interest alone. Why even get the German goverment involved in a project that's essentially pocket change?

      Again, I'm not knocking this, I think it's a great thing that will literally save thousands of lives, and improve the quality of life of potentially millions of others. I've just felt ever since Gates started this whole charity kick that if he would just "think bigger" he could accomplish something that will be written in history books for centuries, cast as a saint, and with good reason. As it is, for the four years he's devoted himself to charity, he hasn't done anything more interesting than hundreds of other charitable organizations, he's just got more publicity because of who he is.

    158. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australia has been running the perfect solution for 200+ years. The long drop. Dig a deep hole, cut a hole in the bottom of a wooden crate that spans the hole, erect a 1 metre by 1 metre corrogated iron (aka "tin") shed and keep a bucket of sawdust in there to sprinkle liberally over each dump. Low tech, when the hole is half full, dig another, move the shed and box over the new hole and fill the old one with some of the new hole's dirt. It's not like they're short of a labour force in Africa. (No, we don't have kangaroos and long drops in the city anymore.)

    159. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Bacterial spread due to spray.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    160. Re:Reflexive /. Gates bashing in 3...2... by xkuehn · · Score: 1
  2. Kudos to Mr. Gates! by Dr.Bob,DC · · Score: 0, Funny


    This is a noble cause, kudos to Mr. Gates! The peoples of the world needs a safe, clean way to dispose of their waste.

    Over 1 million children die every year from diarrhea. Imagine a world where all people can use a toilet then have their cholera and other disease-ridden waste flushed safely away. In poorer countries there are few, if any, health practitioners outside of major centers. So a child with chronic diarrhea would not be able to get in to have their subluxations treated. That's truly sad, but if they can't treat the subluxation at least they can treat some of the diseases that take advantage of a sublux-weakened immune system.

    Also, this project is a much more noble cause than Gates' misguided drive to immunize the world's population. The world's health care systems would collapse unded the weight of all the new cases of Autism if successful.

    Take care,
    Bob.

    --
    Chiropractic Saves Lives!
    1. Re:Kudos to Mr. Gates! by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Funny as fuck and I'm out of Mod points!

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:Kudos to Mr. Gates! by HaZardman27 · · Score: 1

      Alright. I'm convinced that you really are just a troll and aren't actually expecting people to believe your nonsense.

      --
      Apparently wizard is not a legitimate career path, so I chose programmer instead.
    3. Re:Kudos to Mr. Gates! by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Another tough nut to crack "Show me the science"-type.

      Yeah, stupid science. What we need is more people like Bob here who know more about magic beans than those ignorant science type people.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    4. Re:Kudos to Mr. Gates! by jojoba_oil · · Score: 2

      Also, this project is a much more noble cause than Gates' misguided drive to immunize the world's population. The world's health care systems would collapse unded the weight of all the new cases of Autism if successful.

      I may be dense, but I sure hope that's sarcasm. Autism has no relation to vaccination.

      The article spurring that whole belief has been outed as a fabrication. Andrew Wakefield was attempting to push single-disease vaccination shots as a means of boosting pharmaceutical profits, so his "study" showed that only multi-disease vaccinations caused autism. I know it's Wikipedia, but check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MMR_vaccine_controversy for a brief overview. Note the many citations to non-Wikipedia sources such as BMJ and the CDC.

      Someone please tell me this was a Whooooosh moment and I missed the joke.

    5. Re:Kudos to Mr. Gates! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard to tell. That guy's a megatroll for sure (check his comment history; they're all about the same drivel), but as Poe's Law says, it cannot be said if he is serious or not.

  3. This won't be his first shitty idea.. by backslashdot · · Score: 5, Funny

    but I think we can all agree it's a damn good one.

    1. Re:This won't be his first shitty idea.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree. They'll just sell the toilets to buy weapons, or find a way to weaponize the toilets themselves.
      No support.

    2. Re:This won't be his first shitty idea.. by snspdaarf · · Score: 5, Funny

      find a way to weaponize the toilets

      It's called a bidet

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    3. Re:This won't be his first shitty idea.. by taiwanjohn · · Score: 1

      Like all things from Uranus, Brown-25 comes out a little differently.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    4. Re:This won't be his first shitty idea.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at it this way, they are now getting their hardware products more in tune with their software products.

    5. Re:This won't be his first shitty idea.. by iceaxe · · Score: 1

      because we all know it's those poor people with cholera that cause all the problems in the world...

      --
      WALSTIB!
  4. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation != Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The last comment in the story about BSoDs is disappointing. I like to poke fun at Windows and Microsoft software in general as much as the next person over but I have genuine respect for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. They're doing more to solve world problems than most countries are. I can recognize a good thing when I see it and making BSoD jokes when it comes to the foundation just belittles the work they do.

    1. Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation != Microsoft by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I can recognize a good thing when I see it and making BSoD jokes when it comes to the foundation just belittles the work they do.

      Besides that, the BSOD died in 2000. Few people under 25 will even get the reference.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation != Microsoft by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      That's just not true.

      You can still get a BSOD it's just that these days they are rarer than they were in the win9x days and when they do appear the default behavior is to flash the BSOD and then reboot, my current work laptop did this a few times before the manufacturer (Dell) released a few new drivers that I installed...

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    3. Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation != Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just because Bill wants to make up for all those years of being a total dick, doesn't mean I'm going to change my tone toward the man over night. It's going to take a lot more than him parading around throwing money at problems. Why doesn't he try to fix the urban issues here at home before trouncing off to the other side of the globe? Does he not care that he stole billions of dollars from people? Why do you not care? Because you feel bad for the black community because slaves were mistreated and the only source you can think of to ease your own conscious is to attack Africa with your "ideal" lifestyle?

    4. Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation != Microsoft by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      I didn't own a Windows Machine until 2001. I definitely got the BSOD with XP.

    5. Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation != Microsoft by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      You can still get a BSOD it's just that these days they are rarer...

      Exactly my point, thank you.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    6. Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation != Microsoft by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      They're not as separate as you might think. The B&MGF offers medicines to countries where Microsoft has a limited presence and piracy is rampant. Just one catch: they pharmaceutical companies won't provide the medicines unless the recipient government signs an IP treaty with the USA. A treaty that, purely as a side effect, happens to require them to enforce Microsoft's copyright. The Economist had a good article describing the link a couple of years ago.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation != Microsoft by filthpickle · · Score: 1

      Had a drive die and got the blue screen the other day in windows 7. First one I've seen in windows 7, but I don't mess with hardware nearly as much as I used to. I've never seen a non-boot drive go bad and cause a machine so much grief.

      But, you are right, it doesn't happen that much anymore...and it almost never hangs on it when it does.

    8. Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation != Microsoft by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      Besides that, the BSOD died in 2000. Few people under 25 will even get the reference.

      It's still alive and well. I think I heard they were changing the color in win8 (black or something?). AFAIK all operating systems have some kind of variant from the guru meditation error on Amiga to the text based kernel panic on linux or the black "you need to restart your computer" os crash on MacOS. Microsoft just got famous for it because their OS was very pervasive, and the fact that it's relatively easy to crash the os due to the os allowing direct hardware access to user mode software.

      I can recognize a good thing when I see it and making BSoD jokes when it comes to the foundation just belittles the work they do.

      They do seem to be interested in doing some good. I think he's trying to atone for his sins before he dies. Whatever the reason, I struggle to trust anything Mr. Bill does even when it really is a good thing. Human nature, I suppose.

    9. Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation != Microsoft by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I think people have held on to this joke so long that they forget just how often Win9X BSOD'd. People measure WinXP BSOD's by how many they've had in a decade. The Win9X BSOD's were daily.

      The last time any of you were dealing with daily BSODs you were watching the finale of 3rd Rock from the Sun, W. Bush was entering office, and you could still fly on a plane without getting your balls squeezed.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    10. Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation != Microsoft by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      completely not true! get some hardware error and you do see a blue screen, even in win7. saw one on my i5 system just a week or so ago, with win7.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    11. Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation != Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? I've used Vista and 7. I've gotten more BSoDs on the Vista than I can count, and at least five on the 7 so far. BSoDs died out? Yeah right...

    12. Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation != Microsoft by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Well, it's not just the rarity, I've helped several friends fix "my computer just reboots every now and then when I leave a game running" issues that boiled down to flaky graphics drivers which caused a BSOD followed by a reboot. Since they weren't actually at the computer and only noticed it rebooting when it went "beep" on POST they just assumed "it just rebooted". What actually happened was the the graphics driver crapped out, the machine threw up a BSOD and then promptly rebooted.

      It's actually kind of sneaky, gives the impression that the BSOD is rarer than it is (although it is still a lot rarer than back when everyone ran win9x).

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    13. Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation != Microsoft by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Ah, so you're seeing BSOD's 5 times a week on your machine and each of your coworkers' machines around you?

      That's terrible!

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    14. Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation != Microsoft by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      And it hasn't occurred to you that your hardware sucks?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    15. Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation != Microsoft by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Your friend doesn't see BSODs all the time. Again, you're making my point for me. Heh.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    16. Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation != Microsoft by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Your original statement was "[...], the BSOD died in 2000." which is blatantly untrue, it became less frequent and when it does appear MS have cleverly set things up so that many users won't notice it.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    17. Re:Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation != Microsoft by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Your original statement was "[...], the BSOD died in 2000." which is blatantly untrue..."

      Fact 1: WindowsME and older were known to BSOD on an almost daily occurance, hence the popularity of the joke in the first place.

      Fact 2: The WinNT line was muuuch more stable, rarely BSOD'ing, most cases being the fault of bad hardware drivers.

      Fact 3: WinXP, released in 2001, by default reboots instead of leaving up a blue screen.

      If you want to go Commander-Data-Literal, fine, you're only satisfying yourself. But from your own statements it's very clear that if Windows 95 had started with one of the WinNT variants, you wouldn't have nearly 2 decades of BSOD jokes. BSOD == DEAD.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  5. Making fun of gates by Dyinobal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We all might make fun of gates but he's putting money into something that is worth while and often over looked. Having a safe place to poo is a pretty big deal, as it stands now a lot of places that don't end up draining into rivers and other water sources and making people sick.

    1. Re:Making fun of gates by Kenja · · Score: 0

      But he said 640k of ram would always be enough! No amount of charitable work can erase that!

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:Making fun of gates by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I'm being serious here. I've always though that many of the worlds poor dug a shallow hole, squat to defecate, and proceeded to bury. Maybe they used a spade of some sort. All in all, it would not be that unusual. Human beings have probably done something similar for the last...well, however long you define when humanity started. A very long time.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:Making fun of gates by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What about Composting sawdust toilet I'm sure the locals have something they can use in lieu of sawdust.

      You could even create a dehydration toilet Urine is collected separate (where it could easily be evaporated off and the urea used as fertilizer). After dehydrated the human waste could take place of animal dung used for heat.

      I think a bigger and better use of this money would be something to sanitize. Something as simple as soap or the 'waterless' alcohol based sanitizers.

    4. Re:Making fun of gates by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Grinding any local vegetable matter just to defecate is hardly a sustainable idea... they'd still be better off just digging a hole.

      Seems better to be able to use human excrement in one of those natural gas generation facilities, like some way to direct the waste there without loss of gasses.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    5. Re:Making fun of gates by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I've never found a source for that quote. The first time I heard it, in the late '80s, people were claiming that he said 64KB ought to be enough for anyone, and it was a reference to Microsoft BASIC. A few years later, the quote was changed to 640KB ought to be enough for anyone, which made less sense because it referred to an Intel limitation.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:Making fun of gates by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I often don't have respect for many "charitable organizations" as many of them are ineffective and are usually just some sounding board for a group of peoples political beliefs, and do a small set of actual good work so they can get funding, so they can make a living (Often a very wealthy one) being self righteous.

      However the Gate Foundation I do have respect, They do things the right way, They figure were can I put money that will have the most benefit, and make logical decisions. For example they made some people quite angry when their researched showed that Teachers without Masters degree taught students just as well as ones with them. So the Gates Foundation will not wast their money trying to get teachers with Master Degrees, and that schools are wasting their money forcing their teachers to get master degrees.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    7. Re:Making fun of gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually he didn't.

    8. Re:Making fun of gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they do not. Standard operating procedure is to shit into a plastic bag, twirl it around a couple of times and then throw it as far as you can.

      Seriously. Visit a slum in India sometimes - but make sure to duck at the right time.

    9. Re:Making fun of gates by smudj · · Score: 1

      There is no source, or citation. BG has said he never said that in various interviews since the '90s.

    10. Re:Making fun of gates by snemarch · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wrong.

      "I've said some stupid things and some wrong things, but not that. No one involved in computers would ever say that a certain amount of memory is enough for all time I keep bumping into that silly quotation attributed to me that says 640K of memory is enough. There's never a citation; the quotation just floats like a rumor, repeated again and again. "

      - http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Bill_Gates

      --
      Coffee-driven development.
    11. Re:Making fun of gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I may be talking shit again but shouldnt they be finding a practical sanitary way to covert it into a fertiliser. Seems a waste of a valuble resource to do otherwise

    12. Re:Making fun of gates by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      But he said 640k of ram would always be enough!

      No, he didn't- no-one who "quotes" that has ever come up with a citation for where he actually said it.

      (And if the first half *itself* was a joke- as opposed to a setup- then don't pull a "whoosh" on me, because it's certainly not clear that you intended it that way).

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    13. Re:Making fun of gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with humanure, as I understand it, is that for it to be safe certain temperature ranges must be achieved for a period of time. I'm not so sure that this could be used safely with simple bucket/sawdust composting toilets. Using the results before the composting process is complete is likely even worse than whatever method they are using in those parts of the world currently are. Hell, people in my part of the world can't follow basic bathroom hygiene where soap, water, and towels are easily accessible...

    14. Re:Making fun of gates by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Seriously. Visit a slum in India sometimes - but make sure to duck at the right time.

      Really? I've been told by various people who have been to India that what many do is stop walking, lift their garments up a bit, maybe squat/spread the legs a bit, then shit (and it appears to be true: http://therearenosunglasses.wordpress.com/2009/03/05/india-failing-to-control-open-defecation-blunts-nation%E2%80%99s-growth/ ). FWIW many walls also have messages[1] on them telling people not to pee on them...

      As for plastic bags, some places in the world are so poor that plastic bags would be too scarce or too useful to be used for throwing shit.

      On a related note, there's an organization in India that builds public toilets (amongst other things): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sulabh_International

      [1] Sometimes even paintings of Indian gods in the hope of better deterrence: http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2009-09-17/varanasi/28111767_1_ghats-rana-mahal-urinating
      See also: http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2010/06/11/peeing-in-pune-urinating-in-udaipur/

      --
    15. Re:Making fun of gates by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the locals have something they can use in lieu of sawdust.

      Duh, why don't they just use all the leftover food they throw away? Problem solved. You're welcome, Africa.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    16. Re:Making fun of gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did people start leaving off the last "p" in poop? Growing up, it was always called poop. Poo sounds like something a baby would say.

    17. Re:Making fun of gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't use alcohol in a lot of third-world areas because they're Muslim. I'm serious, even the military had to provide non-alcohol antiseptic solutions because of religious rules.

    18. Re:Making fun of gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fundamental problem with composting sawdust and dehydration toilets is that they don't scale. For a one family house, sure, no problem. For a village outhouse, the stuff adds up fast. And thats without having to actually deal with the stuff. Few people want to be told "dry your shit out in the sun and then use it for fertilizer. Don't worry, its sanitary /smile"

      Soap is largely useless when water is in limited supply. 'Waterless' alcohol puts the locals at the economic whims of whoever is manufacturing/supplying/shipping the stuff.

    19. Re:Making fun of gates by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      Hehehe - that must've hurt.

      But still: why not use chaff?

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    20. Re:Making fun of gates by iceaxe · · Score: 1

      The problem happens when all of the places to dig that hole that you can reach within a reasonable walking distance have been used 37 times already this month.

      A good sanitary hole in the ground is perfectly fine for nomads in wide open places, but in crowded conditions - or even long-term residence without crowding - you run out of options.

      Pit toilets and trench latrines work well for more moderate use levels, like temporary habitations or sparser population. For crowded places, you need to move the poo somewhere else, or do something to sterilize it.

      --
      WALSTIB!
    21. Re:Making fun of gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and I told my parents I wasn't watching porn...

    22. Re:Making fun of gates by nschubach · · Score: 0

      .. says Bill Gates.

      I mean seriously. It's unknown if he said it or not, but you trust Bill to admit he made a rather silly statement? If there was no audio or video evidence of me saying/doing something stupid as a kid, I'd definitely deny it.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    23. Re:Making fun of gates by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      It was a meeting in which there were plenty of witnesses, but no recording device. There is also some circumstantial evidence in other recorded statements he made that tends to back it. But it's not slam-dunk evidence, at least not as quoted.

    24. Re:Making fun of gates by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Right, so if nobody exactly remembers the situation and frankly nobody in that room cared at the time (except the person that wrote it down/leaked it out) then if I were Bill, I'd also tell everyone I never said it. Heck, I'm a billionaire. I can say anything and people will believe me.

      My point was that it's one person's word against another. There may be a note written someone from a studious person that says it... but it's still one man's word against another.

      It's just a joke and anyone putting more time into arguing the validity of it is wasting time. (including myself.) Laugh and move on.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    25. Re:Making fun of gates by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I believe he is on record for once saying he was surprised at how fast the full 640k was used up by software vendors, which is almost the same thing; thus he's stuck with it.

    26. Re:Making fun of gates by snemarch · · Score: 1

      He has no problems admitting quotes that are way sillier than the 640kb quote (which isn't so silly if you consider when it was allegedly said) - so I'm inclined to believe him on this one.

      --
      Coffee-driven development.
    27. Re:Making fun of gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We all might make fun of gates but he's putting money into something that is worth while and often over looked...

      Hmmm...I find nothing noble about gaining incredible monetary resources by lying, cheating, stealing, breaking the law, buying the law, buying congress, etc., and then turning around and using such "blood money" for philanthropic purposes.

      Is it better than hording for himself? Yes!

      Does it make everything that went before this not count? Let's ask Dr. Watson...

  6. Didn't he already do that by SteelKidney · · Score: 2

    With Vista?

  7. Nice Editorial by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    I wonder what the toilet version of The Blue Screen of Death is.

    I wonder what the Slashdot version of "Why did the Chicken cross the road?" is.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    1. Re:Nice Editorial by rainmouse · · Score: 1

      I wonder what the Slashdot version of "Why did the Chicken cross the road?" is.

      Why did the [ getRandomEthnicNational() ] cross the road?

      Because the chickens job had been outsourced.

    2. Re:Nice Editorial by SpongeBob+Hitler · · Score: 0

      I wonder what the toilet version of The Blue Screen of Death is.

      I wonder what the Slashdot version of "Why did the Chicken cross the road?" is.

      To die. In the rain. Oh wait, that was Ernest Hemingway.

      --
      Wollt ihr den totalen Krieg?
  8. The toilet version of The Blue Screen of Death by cardpuncher · · Score: 1
  9. Get a sense of humor by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 5, Funny

    It still will be a BSOD, the Brown Screen Of Death.

    It is called humor dammit, even though it may be shitty humor.

    1. Re:Get a sense of humor by operagost · · Score: 2

      The Linux version will be called the Core Dump.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:Get a sense of humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I chuckled :-) I just realized immediately afterwards that I'd stopped thinking about their work and was now thinking of BSoDs.

    3. Re:Get a sense of humor by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      computers are built with AND-gates, OR-gates and NOT-gates.

      here, we have a toilet built using SHIT-Gates.

      (the best I could do on the limited amount of time I had)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:Get a sense of humor by stretch0611 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to protect the system with by installing a good anti-virus.

      --
      Looking for a job?
      Want your resume written professionally?
      DON'T USE TUNAREZ!!!
    5. Re:Get a sense of humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      toilet humour at its shittiest

    6. Re:Get a sense of humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brown Scream of Disembowelment?

  10. BSOD by swanzilla · · Score: 0

    Bad Scent Of Dung.

    1. Re:BSOD by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure, but I'd wager it involves a plunger.

      That's probably how you'd initiate the reboot process.

  11. BSoD will be replaced by famazza · · Score: 3, Funny

    Blue Screen of Death will be replaced by Blue Splash of Death, probably chemical.

    --

    -=-=-=-=
    I know life isn't fair, but why can't it ever be un-fair in MY favor!?
    1. Re:BSoD will be replaced by Conanymous+Award · · Score: 1

      Nah. It's gonna be the Brown Bowl of Death.

    2. Re:BSoD will be replaced by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 1
      --
      I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
    3. Re:BSoD will be replaced by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      It is always fun to shack the shitter enough to give someone smurf butt.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    4. Re:BSoD will be replaced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it will more likely be "the Brown Scream of Death" ;-)

    5. Re:BSoD will be replaced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Blue Screen of Death" obvious becomes the "Pooh Screen of Death."

    6. Re:BSoD will be replaced by udoschuermann · · Score: 1

      Brown Scream of Despair (BSoD), of course.

      --
      --Udo.
    7. Re:BSoD will be replaced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, its going to be called Blue Shit Of Death

    8. Re:BSoD will be replaced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blue Splash of Dung

      There...fixed that for you.

  12. Introducing the Dyson Cyclone Toilet by dun0s · · Score: 0

    Set James Dyson on the case. Combine a toilet with a vacuum cleaner and some sort of composting facility. Actually this sounds rather like an aeroplane toilet. Either way use suction to "flush" the toilet down pipes into some sort of facility that composts the excrement.

    1. Re:Introducing the Dyson Cyclone Toilet by adonoman · · Score: 1

      And in a village without abundant electricity, what do you propose would power this vacuum?

    2. Re:Introducing the Dyson Cyclone Toilet by iceaxe · · Score: 1

      With all due respect to Mr. Dyson's quite notable contributions, I think we need something low tech and cheap to fit this bill.

      --
      WALSTIB!
  13. Bury this shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PSOD - Poo Screen Of Death - sorry I had too :)

  14. BSoD? Really? by fsck! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Say what you want about Microsoft, but that's no longer the same thing as Bill Gates. I've been a /. user for around a decade and have certainly made my share of bad Bill Gates jokes, but the guy is literally trying to save the world now. He has the money and the connections to do it, and the projects he's working on are incredibly selfless. Let's give him a break. OP was being very immature IMHO.

    1. Re:BSoD? Really? by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Heh... One doesn't make up for decades of bad actions that quickly. Moreover...he might have "turned over a new leaf", but from decades of personal experience, that's not so easily done by ANYONE. It's possible- but it's a herculean feat in and of itself. In short, until he's proven himself having changed his tune...he's still got the same inclinations he had when he was at Microsoft's helm. Do keep in mind...he's still Chairman of the BoD.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    2. Re:BSoD? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      the guy is literally trying to save the world now.

      That's what he wants you to think.

      In practice, he's trying to buy himself a positive-opinion legacy. He did this by making a large foundation that runs itself like a business (and operates on vast amounts of money donated by other people), will exist in perpetuity instead of actually spending all its funds, and occasionally makes major decisions that primarily favor either his microsoft goals or the foundation's business goals, not actually doing better things for the world. For example, the microsoft 'charity' of donating their software (and getting tax writeoffs for its sticker price) to stop countries from using non-microsoft software (and often then charging them for upgrades a few years later, too). Or investing in polluting local industries. Or basically trying to kill/cripple the OLPC project because it didn't run microsoft windows and didn't fit his computing device worldview. Or campaigning against collective bargaining for prices on things like vaccines, guaranteeing that his own vaccination program is strictly limited. Gates also does a lot of things that won't necessarily even have a chance of working, but which will get him positive press; and/or tries to get positive press for good things that he actually has very little to do with. In this particular case, the piece is full of fluff... but even then, it's easy enough to read past the headline and realize it's actually the German government doing this, with the Gates Foundation just advising.

      His decisions don't always have some ulterior motive, but doing something in a poorly planned way because "we will do it this way, because I am Bill Gates and it's my money and I am the boss" doesn't help his attempts to construct a hero image of himself.

    3. Re:BSoD? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree. Give credit where credit is due.

    4. Re:BSoD? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Bad actions" just means "doing business". A bunch of filthy neckbeards like to crucify the guy because their little pet OS never took off and replaced windows on the desktop, so they bitterly hate Gates for simply being a successful business man.

    5. Re:BSoD? Really? by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 0

      What a load of silly shit. Literally every sentence you just wrote is idiotic and counter-factual - congratulations moron.

      What's funniest about you stupid "it's a tarp!" assholes is that fundamentally you can't alter the fact that he's giving away huge amounts of his money to charitable donations. What's even funnier is you _try_ to explain it away with some whacky "oh, but he's making money off it somehow" explanation, when in fact he clearly doesn't.

      Just face it - you're a nobody who this world will forget in 100 years, just like me. Unlike you, however, I don't have to try to minimize the efforts of someone who history will remember for a long, long time to make myself feel better about it.

    6. Re:BSoD? Really? by fsck! · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, and I don't.

      Yes, he clearly doesn't understand why there are laws in this country. I personally think he set us back 15 years when, deciding whether the standard PC manifest would include a modem vs. a CD-ROM, chose the latter, asserting (and mandating) that the masses should consume information but not produce it. I think that's shameful.

      On the other hand, most of his actions under Microsoft will be considered as historical minutiae in a thousand years, whereas the effects of elimination of Malaria or of vastly improved water and sanitation will be felt long after.

    7. Re:BSoD? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's why he is the primary investor of Monsanto, right?

      He might have stopped threating us on software, but he is now threatening us on food!

    8. Re:BSoD? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you are going to let the a _ _ hole, Bill Gates, get away with annihilating the far better OS's in the 1990's just because the piece of sh_t is helping developing countries? You are far too kind. For me, little Billie will have to give away every penny he's f_ _king got in payment for how he treated me as a computer user.

    9. Re:BSoD? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the projects he's working on are incredibly selfless. Let's give him a break.

      Do you *really* believe this bullshit? Learn some economics and how taxation works and go through the history of Gates, Microsoft and the companies he is funding.

  15. Limited water resources? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Last I checked most of the surface area of Earth is water. Why not flush toilets with saltwater when 38% of the population lives within 100km of an ocean? Tidal driven pumps could be used for energy efficiency and in desert areas, solar desalinization is a possible source of drinking and irrigation water.

    1. Re:Limited water resources? by BlueScreenO'Life · · Score: 1

      You have to take that water to the residential areas somehow. How do you manage that?

      1) You ship the water in trucks, and have the people dump bucket loads in the john... not exactly convenient, and not sure if it makes economical sense.

      2) Pump the water to the households. That would require building new pipes, because you don't want salty water in the shower/washtub/etc, and most of the current pipes, where existing, would likely corrode quickly with salty water. This is no small deal, considering a good part of the population concerned probably doesn't even have plumbing.

    2. Re:Limited water resources? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last I checked most of the surface area of Earth is water. Why not flush toilets with saltwater when 38% of the population lives within 100km of an ocean? Tidal driven pumps could be used for energy efficiency and in desert areas, solar desalinization is a possible source of drinking and irrigation water.

      1. Salt water is rather corrosive. Cheap metal pipes wouldn't last very long and even the rebar in concrete can corrode.
      2. Human waste is natural fertilizer. You spread it on the ground to make plants grow. Salt is what you spread on the ground when you want to ensure that your enemies' crops won't grow. Use salt to flush with, and what do you get???
      3. Running 2 sets of water lines is more expensive than running one. There are places in the US where this is done, using "gray" water to irrigate with, for example, but not all the world can spare the extra cost of multiple lines, whether pure/gray or pure/salt. Plus, even in affluent countries, some idiot will occasionally get the lines crossed. A "boil water" advisory is bad enough, without having to deal with salted drinking water.

    3. Re:Limited water resources? by russotto · · Score: 1

      Same reason they can't use regular western style flush toilet: infrastructure. Building a saltwater distribution infrastructure doesn't make much sense, because saltwater is very corrosive and not useful for much. Conventional water and sewage distribution and treatment would be cheaper AND better, but of course they can't build that either.

      I think the quest for a better toilet may be misguided. Sure, maybe the foundation pulls a rabbit out of a hat and makes a toilet which doesn't require external infrastructure (water in, sewage out, chemical replenishment, electricity, gas, oil, a regular honey truck route). But then they've solved just one problem. All the other problems resulting from an inability to build civil infrastructure are still there, and no less pressing.

    4. Re:Limited water resources? by Thng · · Score: 1

      And where would the saltwater go? Into the ground and local waterways in some fashion, increasing the salinity. Many soils already get high salinity from irrigation with fresh water. May as well pour salt on the soil or river.

    5. Re:Limited water resources? by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      They don't even have proper houses or roads and you want to build 100km long pipes?

    6. Re:Limited water resources? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure plumbing would be able to cope with saltwater easily.

    7. Re:Limited water resources? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I checked most of Kenya is a lot more than 100km from the ocean and desal plants are not a low cost option.

    8. Re:Limited water resources? by nschubach · · Score: 1

      1) You ship the water in trucks, and have the people dump bucket loads in the john... not exactly convenient, and not sure if it makes economical sense.

      Honestly... convenience? We only need to look back a few years to find that households in America still did essentially this. There was a windmill outside that would pump water up into a bucket if you were lucky... otherwise you had a hand pump. You'd carry whatever water you needed into your house and use it in whatever manner was needed. Bathing, drinking, cleaning...

      I'm sure there is enough time in at least one of the people in the household to be able to get a few buckets of water from the community well.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    9. Re:Limited water resources? by BlueScreenO'Life · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean only convenience for the consumers, but also convenience for planning purposes.

      I guess the community well drew water either from groundwater or from pipes that ran to it.

      But GGP is talking about salt water. I don't think there's a workable way to convey it to the households or to community wells in these places. A vehicle carrying water to refill the wells may work for sparsely populated areas, but I doubt they can afford that. And for conveying salt water, you would need special and costly pipes, which again I don't think they can afford and maintain. The article is about areas with limited water resources - quite a few of them don't even have infrastructure for bringing enough fresh water nearby.

      Besides, like others have pointed out, there is the issue of what to do with the waste. Salt water with excrement is useless - it would just accumulate and cause environment issues. Treating it to make it usable for something - i.e. irrigation, would, again, be very expensive.

  16. Toilet Usage by jeek · · Score: 1

    64.0 oz of water should be enough for anyone!

    --
    If you want to be seen, stand up. If you want to be heard, speak up. If you want to be respected, sit down and shut up.
    1. Re:Toilet Usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's an 'oz' ?

    2. Re:Toilet Usage by rbrausse · · Score: 1

      uh, Australia? any ideas how to convert continents in m^3?

    3. Re:Toilet Usage by jeek · · Score: 1

      Well, the surface area of Australia is 2968000 square miles..
      The surface area of Earth is 197000000 square miles.. and the volume of earth is 259800000000 cubic miles. So, going from the surface to the core, the Australia-shaped wedge of Earth looks like it'd work out to be 3914140000 cubic miles.. or 1.63148472 × 10^19 cubic meters...

      64 * 1.63148472 × 10^19 cubic meters = 1.04415022 × 10^21 cubic meters.

      I think the great-grandparent was using oz as an abbreviation for ounces, though.

      --
      If you want to be seen, stand up. If you want to be heard, speak up. If you want to be respected, sit down and shut up.
    4. Re:Toilet Usage by rbrausse · · Score: 1

      I think the great-grandparent was using oz as an abbreviation for ounces, though.

      or he is *very* generous :)

  17. Get ready... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for a bunch of shitty jokes!

  18. So then, is this... by kakyoin01 · · Score: 1

    ...money down the toilet?

    --
    The more you know, the more you have to say and the more you should listen.
  19. Apple/Jobs charitable policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's interesting that you never hear of Apple or S. Jobs charitable activities mentioned. Most other mega-wealthy individuals enage in some charitable activities. Other than hob-nobbing with rock stars, what kinds of noble works does Steve support, or his corporation?

    1. Re:Apple/Jobs charitable policy by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Steve's only charity is Steve. And to that he gives generously.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:Apple/Jobs charitable policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot supporting really expensive medical care for Steve Jobs. Rather than spending a few pennies on helping millions with medical inovation, he spends millions on help a few (well one to be precise).

    3. Re:Apple/Jobs charitable policy by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      It's interesting that you never hear of Apple or S. Jobs charitable activities mentioned. Most other mega-wealthy individuals enage in some charitable activities. Other than hob-nobbing with rock stars, what kinds of noble works does Steve support, or his corporation?

      What the fuck does that have to with anything? Just because you oppose Gates-bashing, Jobs-bashing is not a relevant response. Is everything MS vs. Apple to you?

    4. Re:Apple/Jobs charitable policy by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

      Hopefully he's one of the first adopters that gets turned into relatively cheap medical innovations later. The government is going to have to clamp down on spending and they won't be paying for anything experimental. Those innovations, if they are going to come, are going to come from rich people.

      --
      Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  20. This is a solved problem by heydan · · Score: 1

    http://humanurehandbook.com/store/LOVEABLE-LOO-Eco-Toilet.html

    1. Re:This is a solved problem by TheCycoONE · · Score: 2

      What do they do with the waste, as far as I can tell they use it for compost, but using human waste as compost for edible products, or even being in contact with it can lead to several diseases

    2. Re:This is a solved problem by heydan · · Score: 2

      Incorrect handling of human waste can indeed spread disease. But with proper composting, you can kill 100% of the pathogens and have no risk of spreading disease at all: http://weblife.org/humanure/

    3. Re:This is a solved problem by iceaxe · · Score: 1

      Solved in the sense that there are numerous ways to do it.

      Not solved in the sense that more than a billion people in the world aren't using any of those solutions.

      The effort here is to put part A together with part B, and improve the lot of those billion plus people.

      --
      WALSTIB!
  21. Simple composting toilets by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 2

    Why re-invent the wheel, just make it low cost and difficult to block up..

    --


    He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    1. Re:Simple composting toilets by Telecommando · · Score: 1
      --
      Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    2. Re:Simple composting toilets by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      The rub's in the "low-cost" territory. They've got systems that'll do this sort of thing- but you're talking about a $2-4k investment per system install.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    3. Re:Simple composting toilets by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Why re-invent the wheel, just make it low cost and difficult to block up..

      Yours blocks up because you make too many logs. Three logs ought to be enough for anyone. -Gates

  22. After Kenya, may I suggest France... by bigredswitch · · Score: 1

    My not-so-old house has toilets with a "continental shell" and a tap to do the flushing, So after the Kenyans get their newfangled MicroToilets, I'd like one of their old ones to replace my shitty (pun intended) Western-style pot.

    --
    After about three months of relentless Willy action I reckon I'm now as good as when I was 10.
    1. Re:After Kenya, may I suggest France... by ShavedOrangutan · · Score: 1

      Or U.S.A.? I live 30 minutes from Washington D.C. in a neighborhood without public utilities. Fresh water comes out of a hole in the ground and waste water goes into another hole in the ground. With too many houses in the region, that fresh water source is becoming contaminated.

      --
      Godaddy is a scam and a ripoff.
    2. Re:After Kenya, may I suggest France... by operagost · · Score: 1

      But I don't know how to use the shells!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:After Kenya, may I suggest France... by operagost · · Score: 1

      We already have a solution for that. When a septic system is installed, a soil perc test should be performed. If there is too much water, the leach field should be placed in a higher area with the effluent pumped up. That's the purpose of the "humps" you might see in rural areas with high water tables.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  23. Reinstall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great you will have to reinstall it every time someone takes a crap.

  24. Can it guys. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C'mon. Whatever you may think of Windows, Microsoft, or even Gates himself, here is a guy putting his money where is mouth is and trying to fix things. Which is a lot more than most of us are doing. Can't we give the snark a rest for a while out of respect for a dude that's quit talking and started doing?

  25. flush lever will be replaced by a touchpad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which will transparently download Active-X plugins that have access to the tank's chemical flushants, which will encourage real innovation from a worldwide network of developers.

    Tip: if you encounter a screen that says "Abort, Retry, Ignore?" you might want to try another stall.

    1. Re:flush lever will be replaced by a touchpad by rbrausse · · Score: 1

      "Abort, Retry, Ignore?" you might want to try another stall

      btw, Abort is an archaic German word for toilet

  26. Box it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They just need people to put it in boxes and send it to people who won Publisher's Clearing House.

  27. TeePee by Nanosphere · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hi my name is TeePee, think of me as your potty assistant! It looks like you're trying to go #2...

    1. Re:TeePee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While eating lunch... I think I may have spat out a bit of food laughing...

    2. Re:TeePee by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      "Sorry, #2 is not available in the Express Edition. Right-flush if you would like to purchase the Professional Edition."

  28. The Blue Screen of Death is : by unity100 · · Score: 0

    Shit in your face ?

    or eating your shit ?

    or, not be able to even shit, because you cant eat ?

  29. Toilets not the issue by Tx · · Score: 3, Informative

    While many of the comments so far are focussing on the issue of toilets, as does the summary, it's the whole sewage infrastructure that's the issue. In the African cities I've been to, large areas don't have proper underground sewers, and sewage is carried in stinking open gutters at the side of the road; having any kind of toilet doesn't help if it's flushing into those open sewers. TFA talks about supporting construction of pit latrines in slums that lack any form of sanitation, so it seems they are being quite practical about working with the existing infrastructure.

    --
    Oh no... it's the future.
  30. Bill Behind the Curtain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But does he say whether the toilet will mutilate your genitals, require a life-long contract with Monsanto, or mysteriously stop working every two hours?

  31. Suggestion from epSos.de by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is already invented Bill. Just make it popular. Repackage and sell it as your own idea.

    Look around Swiss or Japanese shopping websites for ideas. A basic butt shower or a hydraulic bidet attachment will save 2/3 of the toilet paper and almost all of the infections. Water is saved too, because it takes less water to wash a butt than it takes to produce the paper for it. Women love it.

  32. Three seashells! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If anyone can figure out how to use the three seashells, Bill Gates can!

  33. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  34. Toilets are not sanitary by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

    Why would you want the privy right there in the house?

    --
    Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    1. Re:Toilets are not sanitary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      house? Bill's advisors based their study on the models of toilets they found in th 3 Nairobi five star hotels. After all, they were with Microsoft and wanted to design to a general average user spec...

  35. Re:Silly Gates.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think he has finally went over to the nutter side. a flush toilet that wastes precious water is NOT the answer.

    Did you even read the summary? He's not trying to give them flush toilets. He's aware that it wastes water. From the SECOND LINE of the summary: "The goal is to find 'innovative solutions' for sanitation in poor urban areas..." What do you think "innovative solutions" might mean? Could it possibly be something along the lines of "a way to deal with waste in a sanitary way that doesn't involve water"?

    Yeah. Try reading at least the summary before you post.

  36. Re:Silly Gates.... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 2

    By not crapping in their drinking water they might actually have a source of clean water. A proper outhouse might go quite far in accomplishing this.

    I do wonder why something like the basic outhouse won't work. You dig a hole, put a tank* in, built the structure around it. When it gets full either have a truck come and empty it or build a new one. Also when planning an outhouse the best place for it is down stream from your water supply and usually 100' (30 meters) from the well. This way even if the tank leaks it won't contaminate your water supply since it is down stream and a way from it as the dirt acts as a filter.

    * The tank can be pretty much made of anything, like an old metal barrel, old plastic barrel, concrete, special formed plastic tank. I have seen all of these used for outhouses.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  37. Re:Silly Gates.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about fixing these people's government FIRST then helping them with all this other stuff.

    Doing stuff like this in corrupt poorly run countries is much less effective than it should be and only temporary anyway. Total waste of money and resources. Who cares if you help someone get a toilet if it only lasts a couple months before it is broke or stolen.

  38. Re:Silly Gates.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think he has finally went over to the nutter side. a flush toilet that wastes precious water is NOT the answer.

    Uhh, RTFS? That's exactly what he's saying.

    Gates says it's time to move on from the era of the classic toilet.

    ...

    .. just giving them Western-style toilets isn't possible because of the world's limited water resources.

  39. I wonder ... toilet version... Blue Screen by scorp1us · · Score: 1

    The brown cheeks of ass.

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    1. Re:I wonder ... toilet version... Blue Screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe it is the blue douche
      http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=blue%20douche&defid=1856499

  40. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  41. Outhouse? by retroworks · · Score: 2

    I lived in Africa, and built outhouses. We dug a deep hole. Then, we made a shallow square hole, about 6 inches deep, in the soft pile of dirt. We placed a bucket on the ground inside the square, poured cement (and rebar) around the bucket, and when the cement dried we removed the bucket and had a floor with a hole in it. We put the floor with the hole over the hole we'd dug. Then we required people to sign a EULA agreement that by peeing in the outhouse, they agreed not to copy our idea. Wait, no we didn't. Kidding aside, I don't see that water has ever been part of the toilet equation in the developing world.

    --
    Gently reply
    1. Re:Outhouse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you may have missed the word "urban" in the summary.

    2. Re:Outhouse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do they clean their asses after that?
      Because as far as I know, only a few countries see it as normal, to "clean" your ass with paper only, and leave unwashed.

    3. Re:Outhouse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's excellent for the countryside or towns, but it doesn't work too well in the vast, fast-growing cities that are sprouting around Africa. Three or four or five million people shitting into the ground and moving the outhouse when it's full is not practical, unfortunately - the waste needs to be moved and/or treated and/or quickly composted - a non-trivial problem of scale.

    4. Re:Outhouse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This method works to a degree. After a certain number of toilet wells or a certain density of usage in a given area, the ground water will become contaminated. The problem is what to do with sewage from ten million people in a dense urban environment that does not involve large amounts of water to facilitate moving and recycling it.

  42. Re:Silly Gates.... by YodasEvilTwin · · Score: 1

    Mod this up!

  43. Already done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He'll never make a better toilet than Vista.

  44. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  45. Solved Problem by Carik · · Score: 1

    This is a solved problem. Composting toilets have been around for decades, and are not uncommon in highway rest areas. They're low/no water use toilets. Liquids are either evaporated with help from a solar-powered exhaust stack or separated and run through underground perf pipe to water flower beds. The solids break down into a sterile compost, and can be used for fertilizing flower beds. They could, in theory, be used safely for fertilizing vegetables, but the yuck factor is more than most people can get past for that.

    They're not cheap at the moment, but if you ramped up production and focused more on function than appearance they'd be a lot cheaper to make. They've got very few moving parts (a door to get compost out, an electric fan to encourage evaporation of liquids), so they're easy to maintain.

    I appreciate that Bill Gates is trying to solve an important problem -- and it IS an important problem! -- but I find myself wondering why he's not just promoting and improving an existing solution.

    1. Re:Solved Problem by sakdoctor · · Score: 1

      And there's no better solution for highway rest areas.
      In densely populated slums however, composting toilets would not scale.

      If you're not convinced, then you've never seen a slum with your own eyes.

    2. Re:Solved Problem by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      He probably is. The solution is very likely to be something like that, rather than a completely new idea.

    3. Re:Solved Problem by Carik · · Score: 1

      "With one project, the foundation supports the construction of pit latrines in rural areas and slums without sanitation facilities."

      I'd say that in a rural area it would work at least as well as a pit latrine, and possibly better. You may well be right for a heavily populated area, but that's not the only problem they're working on. And really... if a single composting toilet can handle 3-4 people for daily use, I suspect that a system could be built to handle just about any population density, if someone cared to put the money into design.

      And wasn't that what the article was about, really?

  46. Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah... *presses the handle on the toiletr* BSOD! Unable to run flush.exe, it may be corrupt. Please reinstall. D: Ffffff

    Still, I find what Bill Gates is doing is good though. He has tons of money and he is putting it to good use in helping parts of the world.

  47. Re:Silly Gates.... by YodasEvilTwin · · Score: 1

    Mod parent down. Illiteracy should be punished.

  48. EULA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you have to sign a EULA before using the toilet? You agree not to make copies of this toilet. You agree to pay a bi-yearly service fee for this toilet. You agree to bash all other forms of toileting such as the new itoilet.

  49. Re:Silly Gates.... by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    Why not just use seawater for toilets. It's not a potable system anyway. This way you're not wasting fresh water. I guess you still have to do something with the waste, but that seems like 1/2 the battle right there.

  50. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  51. Novel Idea. by CheetoNards · · Score: 1

    How about a system where the excrement passes through a mesh, or screen if you will, that supplies an electric charge to produce ozone (the system could be gravity fed). Add in a natural way to produce chlorine, and you have a simple system to kill bacteria and other organisms. We can call it the "Poo Screen of Death."

  52. Re:Silly Gates.... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    Doesn't have to waste water...

    Sancor has one of the very answers that Bill and Melinda envision. No, it can't scale to large communities- but the thing is...they're not trying to do large communities.

    You can do waterless self-contained, remote, very low flush (~0.5l), and if there's enough power via solar/wind/etc. you can do vacuum flush (~0.2l) systems that can run without much in the way of maintenance for years and years. In the case of the low-flush and waterless systems, the system's capable of handling 10 people continuously with a 12v solar-cell or similar setup.

    Now, if the Gates Foundation can improve upon that...more power to them.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  53. Re:Silly Gates.... by filthpickle · · Score: 1

    A proper privy is sanitary, stinky, but still sanitary. I think he has finally went over to the nutter side. a flush toilet that wastes precious water is NOT the answer.

    I think maybe you've misunderstood something.

  54. Re:Silly Gates.... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    In some locations, it's not QUITE that simple. As for contaminating the drinking water...heh...a composting system can actually fill the bill without needing a classic outhouse, fill the same role, and do it for decades while being able to be placed in locations that would be otherwise impossible for an outhouse.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  55. it would be very funny should they... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... should they put the face of bill gates onto one of these contraptions

  56. Limited water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last I checked, we don't have limited water resources. What we do have is limited potable water resources, but flushing a toilet is something that doesn't need potable water. Kenya isn't landlocked, so if you could build water delivery infrastructure that could withstand saltwater, traditional toilets could be made to work.

  57. Are these people like Sly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't know how to use the three sea shells?

  58. Humanure composting by niko9 · · Score: 1

    How about teaching people how to use a 5 gallon plastic bucket, some sawdust and their kitchen scraps to compost their poop.

    Link: http://humanurehandbook.com/

    No water needed. Your poop and kitchen scraps already contain all the water needed for a thermophilic reaction. Furthermore, you get nice compost that these people can use to fertilize their land. If not for growing things they can keep their land from turning into desert.

    Also, *everything* organic goes into the compost pile: fats, oils, bone, meats, fish, urine, etc., etc.

    There's thousands of folks already doing this in the US. We need to stop using purified drinking water to whisk away our poop.

    Humanure videos: http://humanurehandbook.com/videos.html

    Forums: http://www.jenkinspublishing.com/messages/

    1. Re:Humanure composting by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      These people do not have saw dust or a kitchen in some cases. Many parts of the world that have these problems are deforested already as that was the only fuel they had to cook with.

      Any other bright ideas?

    2. Re:Humanure composting by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Tough to pull off in an apartment.

    3. Re:Humanure composting by ledow · · Score: 1

      A hole in the ground. Dig a large one, poop in it, cover it (with anything that will cover a hole). Throw anything organic (including dead animals) in there and keep it covered. Once a year, dig a new one next to the old and fill the old with the soil from the new. People have been doing this for centuries. A way to poop without water is not the problem here, it's teaching people not to poop in their water supply even if it "seems" alright.

      The British Army basically took over a third of the world because we figured out sanitation and everyone else's troops were suffering with stomach problems which stopped 50% of them fighting. We basically learned to not put latrines near your food preparation area, and to wash your hands in *something* (sand will do - it's the abrasive action of drying them that actually cleans them) and instantly cut out quite a lot of disease.

      How do you think people coped for the thousands of years prior to running water into every home, even in the most crowded of places? The only difference is that you have to learn not to throw your waste into the streets and just leave it there.

    4. Re:Humanure composting by corbettw · · Score: 1

      What about the problem of cholera epidemics? We've conquered that disease in the west, but it still ravages entire countries in Africa. Simply pouring cholera-infested feces onto crops (let alone handling it all) doesn't seem like a very sound idea.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    5. Re:Humanure composting by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      They live in cities and often in slums. This means they don't own land to put these holes. So where are they going to dig these holes?

      How do you think people coped for the thousands of years prior to running water into every home, even in the most crowded of places?
      Often by pooping in a pot, then dumping that into the above ground sewer. No above ground sewer is available and these folks might actually be so poor they don't have a pot to piss in.

    6. Re:Humanure composting by Synn · · Score: 1

      Not really. I use one of these on my 32ft boat I liveaboard: http://www.natureshead.net/

      My bathroom on that boat is smaller than most apartment closets.

    7. Re:Humanure composting by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      What you linked to isn't exactly a five gallon bucked. And what do you do about it when it's full? And remember that in the space of your 32 foot boat a third world poor urban apartment dweller would probably be living with his family of... 10 maybe? With constant use of the facilities. Now multiply that by however many apartments you have in the building, and however many buildings you have in a neighborhood, etc. And then there's compliance - my PhD candidate in Physics housemate in grad school was too lazy to compost properly (even though she was really excited about it) to the point where I had to forbid composting. SOMEONE's neighbour is going to screw it up, with nasty results.

      Another problem few people think of - my city started a great initiative to get compost bins into everyone's hands. Great! But what do you do with the compost? If you're just composting kitchen waste you might be okay but if you're composting ALL your organic waste you're going to have a problem - most city dwellers use far more organic material than they have the space to produce, which means you're going to have excess compost. It has to be collected. It's valuable fertilizer, but you have to have a transport plan in place to get it to where it's needed.

      I'm not saying composting toilets are the wrong way to go, but for a dense urban environment the 5 gallon bucket probably isn't the ideal approach. A community toilet might be better, with a plan including storage while the stuff is composting, and distribution and/or transport of the end product. There are lots of details there to be hammered out, and some trials to run. Slightly more complicated than "here's a bucket."

    8. Re:Humanure composting by niko9 · · Score: 1

      These people do not have saw dust or a kitchen in some cases. Many parts of the world that have these problems are deforested already as that was the only fuel they had to cook with.

      Any other bright ideas?

      You don't have to use sawdust specifically. Any fine source of carbon works fine: rice hulls, leaf mold, coffee grounds. etc. The idea is to have your cover material produce small air pockets so an aerobic thermophilic reaction takes place instead of an anaerobic one.

    9. Re:Humanure composting by niko9 · · Score: 1

      What about the problem of cholera epidemics? We've conquered that disease in the west, but it still ravages entire countries in Africa. Simply pouring cholera-infested feces onto crops (let alone handling it all) doesn't seem like a very sound idea.

      That's the purpose of *composting* human or animal waste to begin with. The thermophilic reaction kills all harmful bacteria. In addition, you let your "pile" rest for 1 year before its used. What you then put on your crop is not feces but earthy smelling compost that you can safely handle with your bare hands.

      Dumping un-composted "feces", aka nigh soil, straight onto crops can make people sick: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night_soil

    10. Re:Humanure composting by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      What makes you think they have ready access to that stuff? Not a lot of rice hulls available in most places, leaf mold is rare in cities and coffee is too expensive for these folks.

    11. Re:Humanure composting by nschubach · · Score: 1

      If they live in slums, who's going to maintain the extensive waste networks or maintain the toilets if they break? Even solar powered solutions need someone to clean off the panel every now and then (if they aren't stolen.)

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    12. Re:Humanure composting by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Now you are understanding the problem.
      This is what these folks are up against. Haiti had similar issues after the earthquake. To feed themselves these people will steal the very devices giving them fresh water. It is hard to find fault with it when your children have water and are now just back to starving.

      The real solutions will require fixing the governments and the whole society. The money to do these things exists, at least at the basic level. The robber barons that run these nations are stealing it.

    13. Re:Humanure composting by nschubach · · Score: 1

      I don't believe I ever misunderstood the problem.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  59. This is great and all... by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 1

    But what about our own country? Granted, in the big picture, $10 million isn't all that much, but there are much closer problems to deal with. American's without homes have no computers, can't buy Windows and other Microsoft products!

    With as much money as the guy has, he could do wonders for our country. Our new IT-powered smart grid will undoubtedly be run by Windows, so put some money into at least designing a classy Blue Screen of Death. Help fight hunger. Donate computing power for crop yield research. Donate computing power for automotive fuel efficiency (not fuel emission) research. For the children(!!!!!) put money into our educational system, so teachers can actually get paid and feel appreciated and love their jobs again!

    I don't understand this need for us to help everyone else while we let our own country go to shit. 800,000 Kenyans get toilets, that's great. But what about the 600,000 homeless we have? What about their toilets!?

    1. Re:This is great and all... by devleopard · · Score: 2

      I'd recommend you read up on his foundation. One of their largest focuses is education. He's given to plenty of other state-side causes, such as the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (largest gift the CFF has ever received, no less).

      Reality: money is good at quickly fixing infrastructure issues. It's far less efficient at fixing behavioral issues. I think it's a given that much of the US's problem are behavior based: racial bias, drug dependency, broken homes, and more (and often many of these causes).

      It's a matter of impact. Where can his (or yours, or mine) money make an impact? I think Bill thinks beyond "his backyard", as I think is a far more enlightened approach. "How can I best help humanity today?" rather than "'Mericans first!"

      I have no doubt that he will tackle domestic issues as well. After all, he's pledged to give away half of his income. That's an undertaking. Our problems will require significant planning - they aren't issues you just write a check for. For now, he's tackling the low hanging fruit.

      --
      The best thing about a boolean is even if you are wrong, you are only off by a bit.
  60. Re:Silly Gates.... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    If you put your outhouse at the proper distance and dig a reasonable leech field there is no need for a tank at all. Sure it would nice to have, but with only a shovel a workable solution could be made.

  61. MOTH*RF*CK*R by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Really, seriously, .....?
    We can use brilliant minds to do so much needed good in the world, without having idiots worrying about something that is already
    working properly...come up with a way to end hunger, or use technology to advance 3rd world countries...or come up with a way log every shipment
    that is sent from these supposed help foundations to make sure the cargo reaches the destination instead of being hijacked along the way...
    or bring water to villages missing it in Africa...or how to grow better crops....or just anything more then worrying about someone else's crap...
    pun intended

  62. Toilet Version.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Brown Spray of Filth?

  63. Re:Silly Gates.... by sakdoctor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not quite sure what this problem looks like in your imagination, but the fact is, we're approaching the stage where most of the world's population live in cities.
    Population density without the infrastructure to remove the waste is the problem. It's a very hard logistics problem.

    You can't just dig a hole 30m down the road in an urban environment.
    Also, "planning an outhouse", yes that's another problem since lack of infrastructure, poverty, filth and improvised shelter, ie slums, are all part of the mix.

    Lots of perfectly functional, albeit hippyish solutions like composting toilets do not scale to urban environments.

  64. Re:Silly Gates.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Outhouses are all well and good in rural areas.
    But the problem's in the cities, too. And you simply can't build enough outhouses in a densely populated city to handle that population; there's just no room to do so. You can't rely on fresh water to flush, because it's already scarce. You can't rely on chemicals or electro-anything, because that's expensive and this is a population that's lucky to get a few dollars a day.

    And it's far easier to keep contaminants out of the water supply in the first place than to remove them once the water's dirty. The best purification systems in the world will be gummed up in a matter of hours if given feedwater from the slums of Sri Lanka.

  65. Re:Silly Gates.... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    Not only did i read the summary but I read the FA as well. they are trying to apply technology that will not be fricking used for a problem that a solution was discovered several thousand years ago.

    You dont crap where you drink and eat. A proper outhouse is the solution. they talk about children playing in sewage, that is because these people are just crapping randomly or in open pits. where a proper outhouse IS the answer.

    Blowing money to find a solution that has existed forever is dumb.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  66. Re:Silly Gates.... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

    The summary specifically mentions urban areas. Downstream of your water supply probably isn't downstream of your neighbour's in a city. So you need some innovation to make sure it doesn't leak. Just digging a hole and covering it up when it's full isn't sustainable in a city. You need some way of getting the waste outside city limits where there's more space for storage or to a central location for treatment. Either of those solutions could use some development to make a system that's efficient and reasonably priced.

  67. Will It Have... by X3J11 · · Score: 1

    Will it have three seashells?

  68. Reinvent the GPF! by Waruwaru · · Score: 0

    The blue flush of waste!

  69. Re:Silly Gates.... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    The funny part is that history already has those answers to draw upon. with minor changes that can easily be done you can upgrade what we used to do in cities before the flush toilet existed.

    Look at london, NYC, etc... a lot of the world had large cities without plumbing and sewage answers for a very long time.
    But there are no answers for dense populations without having a way of sewage removal, unless they invent the portable black hole and give them away for free to everyone.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  70. First Maleria now this! by random+coward · · Score: 2

    I am impressed he's found something else to do good with.
    But I suggest he look at what Nepal did:
    He could fix the sanitation issue and solve a large part of their energy issues very cheaply. He just needs to push some startup money to modify the designs for the different areas and some startup money for a micro-finance so people will be able to buy them.

    Here is an article on how nepal did it:
    http://www.michaelyon-online.com/gobar-gas.htm

    1. Re:First Maleria now this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes because injecting money in Africa has always helped those in need, like the Mr.President of Some African Country.

    2. Re:First Maleria now this! by hedpe2003 · · Score: 1

      Great article, and I think this solution is just excellent!

      --
      Comprehensive solutions via a competition of ideas like no other.
  71. Had to come up with some way...... by OS2toMAC · · Score: 1

    to get rid of that piece of crap Vista.

  72. Vermiculture by ahow628 · · Score: 1

    How about a worm composting toilet? From what I hear, they are nearly odorless and use no water. You can even throw other stuff in there like cardboard and food stuffs. http://www.wikihow.com/Make-Your-Own-Worm-Compost-System

  73. The brown bowl of death by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

    Given that Gates is responsible for a good part of our current software IP cultural cesspool that limits choices and uses in favor of profits and power-building, I'd say he's more than qualified to wade into this one.
    His ideal toilet? You don't own it, you pay per use to use it with his permission after agreeing that he owns it.
    You can't use another toilet without paying for it too, and your guests can't use your toilet unless you buy a special license.
    It upgrades itself without your consent, and several times per month it freezes up and doesn't let you use it. The next version of the toilet supposedly runs twice as fast and freezes half as often, but it takes you 15 minutes to find where they put the handle on it this time.
    And every time they upgrade the toilet, you need to buy a new house because your old house isn't big enough to accommodate it.

    1. Re:The brown bowl of death by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

      And it will only work for you if you bought your food from him.

  74. Gaahhh! I'm eating my lunch! by beschra · · Score: 1

    "Excrement"

    --
    It is unwise to ascribe motive
  75. o-vosso-medo-e-a-merda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://permaculturaportugal.ning.com/video/o-vosso-medo-e-a-merda

  76. Population control is needed more than toilets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is there are too many people generating an unmanageable amount of waste. If you look at the population growth of many African countries, you'll see that the population has *quadrupled* in the past 40 years. Is it any wonder that they are straining their fledgling infrastructure? Condoms and other birth control are need far more than toilets. Posting anonymously because discussion of birth control for Blacks is sure to draw fire as racist.

    1. Re:Population control is needed more than toilets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Birth control is needed everywhere, not just Africa.

  77. BSoD by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    Brown Shoes of Disgust.

  78. The general way in wich we "help" the 3rd world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gates bashing? No. But the general idea of "helping 3rd world countrys to develop" in itself always comes at a price. There is no such thing as "selfless help", thats an illusion. As a price, the 3rd world has to deliver their raw materials, conform to our political and social requirements and adapt to our ideas of living. If I look into the past, the first world in itself is responsible for a good part of the chaos in Africa.

    We might help them with toilets and glassmarbles but we block their own way of doing things since long ago, all the time. As if our western society would be flawless. Pure intolerance, disguised as helping. Their decisions are dependant from and limited through the money of the big funds.

    Moreover, helping someone means you judge him too weak to do it himself. Thats the opinion you direct to the one you help if you want it or not.

    Gates, like the many other rich and poor helpers, doesn't know it better. He doesn't mean it bad. It's just our general thinking. But no help comes for free.

    True help does not mean to put them our fabricated solutions in front of their nose.

    True help would mean to empower the people to get independent to find their own solutions and to respect their way of doing things even if they differ from our own ways. True help means also letting someone make their own mistakes.

  79. I know what it'll be... by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

    ... the Brown Sludgy Flush of Death

  80. BSOD by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    I wonder what the toilet version of The Blue Screen of Death is

    I'm not sure, but I'd wager it involves a plunger.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  81. human feces is not manure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's reason human feces isn't used as manure without intensive processing. Herbivore feces has less dangerous bacteria.

  82. Cool, as long as he's clued in about skid marks by spads · · Score: 1
    --
    Bukowski said it. I believe it. That settles it.
  83. Our way of helping is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gates bashing? No. But the general idea of "helping 3rd world countrys to develop" in itself always comes at a price. There is no such thing as "selfless help", thats an illusion. As a price, the 3rd world has to deliver their raw materials, conform to our political and social requirements and adapt to our ideas of living. If I look into the past, the first world in itself is responsible for a good part of the chaos in Africa.

    We might help them with toilets and glassmarbles but we block their own way of doing things since long ago, all the time. As if our western society would be flawless. Pure intolerance, disguised as helping. Their decisions are dependant from and limited through the money of the big funds.

    Moreover, helping someone means you judge him too weak to do it himself. Thats the opinion you direct to the one you help if you want it or not.

    Gates, like the many other rich and poor helpers, doesn't know it better. He doesn't mean it bad. It's just our general thinking. But no help comes for free.

    True help does not mean to put them our fabricated solutions in front of their nose.

    True help would mean to empower the people to get independent to find their own solutions and to respect their way of doing things even if they differ from our own ways. True help means a lso letting someone make their own mistakes.

    That all doesn't mean these toilets have to be a bad thing. I don't know the project and it will in itself most certainly be positive, Im sure. But what I said stays nevertheless true.

  84. It's about time! by bobaferret · · Score: 1

    I've been waiting to find out WTF the three sea shells is all about for years now!

  85. Should be flushed... by BudAaron · · Score: 1

    My irritation grows every day with slashdotter's bashing everything Windows or Bill Gates. Hopefully they will all get flushed down Bill's new excrement eliminator. It would make for a cleaner slashdot LOL

  86. Re:Silly Gates.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget that in some places water and sanitation are actually going backwards -- devolving. Not to pick on India, but when the Brits left most of the country had access to reliable safe 24x7 water -- that's the minority now since nobody respected it and maintained the infrastructure. When you have water with positive pressure behind it, then leaks don't generally lead to contamination. Sure you lose fresh water, but the nasty bugs have a hard time swimming upstream. When you have sporadic water in the pipes the flow is both ways and in many places the leaky sewer pipes are in the same trench as the leaky water pipe. Get a copy of "The Big Thirst" and give it a read. Getting rid of the flush toilet solution has wide ramifications that may not be immediately obvious.

  87. I think the guy is a saint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was a bit grumpy in the past about him having a monopoly, but now that I see what he's doing with that money I take it all back. Rather than creating a dynasty so his kids can become bratty, spoiled, self entitled little Kennedys, he instead decides makes the world a better place. He has my admiration x 10.

  88. A man that knows about crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well he certainly knows a LOT about producing and dealing with CRAP!

  89. Re:Silly Gates.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely there might be a reason that not everyone uses sanitary solutions. They aren't always reasonable, or perhaps they aren't as sanitary as you think. I can think of a lot of scenarios where it'd be very difficult to keep it from getting into your drinking water.

  90. Blue Ass of Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also fuck them. He needs to help the people who gave him all that money.

  91. Bill Gates Looks to Reinvent the Toilet by redactor · · Score: 1

    ... tentatively code named Windows PEE.

    1. Re:Bill Gates Looks to Reinvent the Toilet by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      After 5 years they will rename it: Windows Poo. ;-)

  92. Me thinks it is like a weasel... by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 2

    You're over thinking the problem. The bashing will be real toilet humor, heh. Something about them being full of shit, or about what floats, or you can't keep a good gates flushed down.

    That's far easier than sinking a joke about windows or getting potty mouthed. But, fighting the urge is just pissing in the wind. When mother nature calls with a joke, Just go with it and let it flow.

    Thank you, thank you, I'm here all week folks!

    --
    I8-D
  93. Re:Silly Gates.... by adonoman · · Score: 1

    Outhouses need to be moved frequently in order to remain sanitary (especially when you have many people using them). With the population densities you have in refugee camps and slums, that becomes unfeasible. You can't just drop an outhouse anywhere either - you need to be aware of the ground water, proximity to drinking / bathing water, soil types, etc... They "worked" in other places and times because the population densities were lower (and where they weren't, people died from water-borne bacteria and parasites all the time - up until fairly recently, water-borne disease would kill more soldiers at war than other soldiers would). Sanitation education does help in places where the density is low enough to be sustained by outhouses, but more efficient processing techniques (like composting toilets, indoor plumbing, or whatever new innovation this project might come up with) are still required where outhouses are insufficient.

  94. well.. by Charliemopps · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've been to Ethiopia and the clean water issue was pretty much the biggest problem there. Their cities are the very definition of "ancient" I doubt there's any place on earth that's had humans living in large numbers for as long. Buildings are packed so close together there is hardly room for new ones, and the space between the buildings is filled with "homes" thrown together out of cinder blocks, Joshua tree timber and corrugated steel (this is where the middle class live.) Underneath all of this is the plumbing of the city... it's very... very... very old. When a water main brakes, a city truck comes with shovels and a replacement pipe. Ethiopians flock to the truck and grab shovels, dig out the pipe and replace it. The government dudes then hand them cash for their trouble. All the sewer pipes lead to the same place... the river. Where do they get water? You guessed it, the river. there is no simple solution to this system. There are millions of 100+ year old sewage pipes draining into that river. All the pipes are so old they likely all leak and exchange contents between themselves all the time. So even if you could get clean water to begin with it'd likely not be clean when it arrived. You can't dig up the old pipes because they all run under buildings literally older than Jesus in some cases and there are simply no utility records at all.

    On top of every building thats owned by anyone with money is a water tank. They pay other companies to come and fill that tank dailly or weekly. Showering with this water would be too expensive so this is your drinking water and you shower in the tainted water and keep your mouth closed. Another problem is the way bathrooms are designed in Africa and the middle east. In every place I stayed there was a bathtub with no shower head. Instead they had a sprayer on a hose that was part of the tubs faucet that could hang up high if you wanted it. I was told this has something to do with the muslim religion or something, I dont really know. But this sort of setup is against code in the US. Why? Because you can lay the hose down into the tub. If you have the tube full of water, and wash yourself in it... now the water is dirty. If the hose is laying in the water it can now siphon the dirty water back into the water supply. Every single tub is like this.

    The only thing that I saw that was really working there was bottled water. It was plentiful and it was cheap. I could get a liter of good bottled water for about 10 cents. That's still a lot for the poor there, but, with a little more effort it could be made even cheaper.

    Despite all this, the fact of the mater was water born illness was so common they didn't even bother to treat it in most cases. They wait until it becomes a real health problem. We adopted our son there and when we got back our entire family were basically on antibiotics for a full year afterwards. The stuff is so easy to spread, especially when you have a child in diapers that you cure one familly member and a week later another gets sick... in the end the doctor got fed up and just put everyone, even our dog on antibiotics at the same time for 6 weeks strait and finally we were rid of it.

    1. Re:well.. by colinnwn · · Score: 1

      Instead they had a sprayer on a hose that was part of the tubs faucet that could hang up high if you wanted it. I was told this has something to do with the muslim religion or something, I dont really know.

      I'm no expert, but apparently this is a Shattaf bidet spray for (obviously) cleaning your backside. Cleaning with water is required. I thought Muslims are not cool with toilet paper and using your right hand. The Wikipedia entry seems to suggest otherwise. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_hygienical_jurisprudence#Islamic_toilet_etiquette

      But this sort of setup is against code in the US. Why? Because you can lay the hose down into the tub. If you have the tube full of water, and wash yourself in it... now the water is dirty. If the hose is laying in the water it can now siphon the dirty water back into the water supply.

      This isn't true in general, though possibly it is in some cities or states without enlightened plumbing code. It is within code to have a shower/bath with a hand sprayer on a hose long enough to lay in the bottom of the bathtub. The water utility is required to maintain a minimum water pressure to prevent backflow, and if it falls too low for any reason, they'll tell everyone in the city the water is not potable and to flush their pipes for several days. New construction and substantial plumbing retrofits frequently require installation of a backflow preventer at the house water meter, or at least on every outside water faucet (not that it would solve the bathtub problem.)

    2. Re:well.. by blair1q · · Score: 1

      This is the GOP's plan for America's future.

      I shit you not. They dream of having all the money and leaving you to dig up the sewerpipes on your block when they break. And not paying for your health care when that causes predictable problems.

    3. Re:well.. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      I was told this has something to do with the muslim religion or something, I dont really know.

      FWIW, vast majority of Ethiopians are Orthodox Christians, not Muslims.

    4. Re:well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Usian babies up for adoption at the time?

    5. Re:well.. by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Not from my experience, having been there. It was about half and half in the capital city. Out in the countryside it was more christian because US based churches and charities ran the majority of the clinics, hospitals, etc... But they were more christian out of convenience than actual deep faith. Even the ones that thought of themselves as Christians seemed to have a strange hybrid of Judism and Christianity. They were all very wrapped up in the old testament because they were convinced most of the places in the old testament were in Ethiopian (they may very well be right, I have no idea. Ask any christian there where Moses was born and they'll show you on a map. It's a matter of pride there.

  95. Who Cares? Speaking about money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who really cares what Bill Gates wants to do with his money. I think its great that hes contributing towards a causes that matter. If you all want something/someone to bash when it comes to money, take a look at the politicians running the country and the current mess theyve created with money... i have way more respect for Bill Gates than any of them

  96. The real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real problem in the world is not too-much-shit, nor is it too-few-toilets. The problem is too-many-people.

    Will better toilets lead to better population control? I don't see that happening..

  97. Already Reinvented by Joshua+Fan · · Score: 1

    10 million dollars might come back around to reinventing this. What could be simpler than a sanitary, biodegradable bag? http://www.peepoople.com/

  98. Re:Silly Gates.... by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

    Even better than your standard outhouse - a composting outhouse. Those are designed to collect the crap rather than put it in a hole in the ground. Then at some point you move it from the bin where you've been keeping it to a separate composting area, wait a while, and eventually end up with something that can be used as fertilizer.

    It's worth noting that much of Africa has been improving significantly with regards to water safety and sanitation in a lot of areas, precisely because a lot of the governments and NGOs have been focusing on it. It's a way to get a big health and quality-of-life improvement in rural areas at a relatively low cost.

    The Gates Foundation is targeting the right problem, no question. What they aren't realizing is that there are established really good solutions out there already. (More cynically, they might be looking for a solution that somebody can patent and make big bucks off of. I sincerely hope that's not the case.)

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  99. Re:Silly Gates.... by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

    Yes, seawater. Exactly what you have a surplus of in the Serengeti.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  100. 2003 "Aprils Fools'" Joke Becoming Real? by aggemam · · Score: 1

    Seems like MS will not let go of their old ideas :)

    http://www.zdnet.com/news/microsoft-flushes-out-iloo-gag/129298

  101. Greatness by Myopic · · Score: 1

    Bill Gates is truly a great man. During his tenure with Microsoft, he was a great big douchebag who harmed the world and reaped untold riches off the gullibility of people who should have known better. Now, he is a great big philanthropist who helps the least of humanity, and is on track to fulfill his promise to gift away the vast majority of his treasure.

    That's how greatness usually works -- greatly good, and greatly bad -- and it's often unclear whether the sum of all works of a great person is net positive or negative.

  102. Re:Silly Gates.... by lavalyn · · Score: 1

    Had to post this link...

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121219687026134617.html

    Building inadequate sewage infrastructure... and its consequences.

    --
    Doing the Right Thing should not be preempted by making a buck.
  103. No nice way to say this by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But there is a difference between not having a degree in biology or waste management and living under the control of people that tell you to pray for rain in a massive drought. Or who believe raping a baby (or any virgin but easiest with a baby) cures aids. Or eat albino people to gain their powers. And don't act so high and mighty, it wasn't so long ago in the west we burned people alive for voodoo, oops witchcraft or killed people for their faith and made lampshades out of them.

    Civilization, you never truly appreciate it until every last bit of it has been stripped away from you. There are still houses in western Europe where you can see the design for crapping out on to the street. The London sewer system isn't all that old (compared to civilized man capable of building a toilet) but us modern humans still rely on it because we are no longer capable of the massive engineering it took to build it to upgrade it to modern needs.

    A hole in the ground that is all? What about leach area, the radius around the hole in which you shouldn't dig or grow crops etc? How do you know? For thousands of year NO human knew. We thought smell kept evil spirits away. You and I can drink purest water from the tap for less then the cost of a peanut but drink instead poisoned water from plastic bottles at outrages prices and waste most of it for flushing the toilet.

    I sit here within easy reach of enough food to last me a week, pure water how ever much I want, power for a dozen gadgets, in building that doesn't even budge in the worsed storms. Maybe you are too, but I don't pretend that my state in the norm in the rest of the world. Am I grateful for it? Hell no, I am a spoiled westerner but at least sometimes a story like this reminds me there are other places in the world. Maybe you should too. Even knowledge we consider basic is not universal. Just because you had over a decade maybe even two of education doesn't mean everyone has.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:No nice way to say this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But thanks to the holy inquisition, many so called witches were saved from the barbary of secular local courts.

    2. Re:No nice way to say this by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

      It's always a shock to remember that one approximate division between the richest and poorest 50% is that half of the world does not live with indoor toilets or indoor running water.

    3. Re:No nice way to say this by nschubach · · Score: 1

      And don't act so high and mighty, it wasn't so long ago in the west we burned people alive for voodoo, oops witchcraft or killed people for their faith and made lampshades out of them.

      I sit here within easy reach of enough food to last me a week, pure water how ever much I want, power for a dozen gadgets, in building that doesn't even budge in the worsed storms. Maybe you are too, but I don't pretend that my state in the norm in the rest of the world.

      I'm honestly baffled that someone would think that I am acting "high and mighty" and that I think "my state of living is normal for the rest of the world" from anything I've written here.

      I simply stated that there have been methods for dealing with waste for as long as humanity has walked the Earth. Some of it is bad. Some of it is good. A simple building with a hole in the floor and an access panel in the back where someone could spread and bury waste is quite simply the simplest method (outside of digging a hole and crapping in it...) that anyone has ever thought of. If the people of Africa can't handle this simple task, how are they going to maintain compost toilets, plumbing of any kind, or any of the other various methods named in these threads? If there's an overpopulation issue due to poor social standards and Bill Gates walks in creating toilets for the population to prevent the death and diseases from spreading... how does that help the people in 10 years when they under-appreciate those facilities and continue their social habits of reproduction?

      Yes, waste management is an important part of any society, but if they can't be bothered to do the most simple task known to man for all time... how can you sit here and tell me I'm an ass for not appreciating their problems? All societies have developed ways to deal with it. From the Western to the Eastern societies. IF they can't deal with the waste they are producing there far more serious issues at hand.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    4. Re:No nice way to say this by backslashdot · · Score: 1

      No there hasn't been. Waste management is one of the hardest problems. Until waste management techniques were invented, civilizations could not advance .. disease would wipe them out. Simply burying shit is not a good waste management method. I mean, did you even account for the water table? What happens when disease spreads into the water table and then the water supply? The main problem Africa is facing is the spread of disease, which is exactly the problem faced in Europe before they implemented good waste management. When a society has a large disease burden, most able bodied and caring persons end up having to take care of sick relatives instead of working or getting an education. This causes a vicious cycle of poverty, lack of education, and other problems.

    5. Re:No nice way to say this by nschubach · · Score: 1

      You have to have a way to get the waste out or deal with it locally. Those two methods require that someone crap in a bucket and carry it somewhere since plumbing would be a bad choice for maintenance and cost reasons. From the gist I'm getting, this is even a problem for some. People are looking for a magic bullet fix to the problem and there isn't one without first reforming the whole social structure in the area.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  104. long live the iLoo by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1
    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  105. Three sea shells by bigredradio · · Score: 1

    So we are finally getting our three sea shells. (Look it up)

  106. Nothing new here... by bodland · · Score: 1

    Most Corps use Microsoft Outhouse already.

  107. Citation needed by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    You know, I've heard that story many times. It comes up every time the Gates Foundation is mentioned on /. But I have yet to see an actual reputable citation supporting the claim that this supposed requirement actually exists. The Gates Foundation Wikipedia article doesn't mention it under its "Criticism" section. I looked at the Economist articles on the Gates Foundation and don't see the article you describe. The closest thing I could find was this article in the L.A. times, which criticizes some of the Gates Foundation's investments.

    The only stuff I can find on the Gates Foundation and IP at all seems to indicate that their only concern with IP is with the rights of the local researchers that they give grants (they generally are required to publicly publish their results). And nowhere have I seen any mention of a requirement that a country that gets a grant has to sign the WIPO treaty (or any other treaty).

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Citation needed by Rufty · · Score: 1

      The Gates Foundation is pushing AMCs, which have come in for a wary reception.

      --
      Red to red, black to black. Switch it on, but stand well back.
  108. wait, I'm confused now Toilet, Winlet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought that was what Windows is all about. So Toilets are now Winlets?

  109. My ex asked what she would be if she was Windows by drainbramage · · Score: 1

    Well. I answered, since the current version is 7, yer' an 8.
    Did I mention she's an ex?

    --
    No brain, no pain.
  110. Shit burgers? by luvs2splooge · · Score: 1
  111. 2 squares of paper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ought to be enough for anybody.

  112. think, err, outside? the, uhm, box! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    http://m.prioritymail.com/stepone.aspx

    Probably should include plastic liner bags with that.
    The other problem is exactly where are they going to send these to?

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  113. top-down philanthropy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately he's dumping his money on a technical fix rather than a sociotechnical one. I'm not saying technology will play no part but skimming TFA seems to imply that he's going to in the end tell/sell people something that they don't ultimately have ownership in. I'm very wary of BG these days having watched him muck around in education and recently try to create phony "grass roots" groups to undermine teachers and their own organizations. Working with the people you want to change may be slow and frustrating, but ultimately, if you want to succeed you need to have those people on your side.

  114. Why not by Strych9 · · Score: 2

    If the toilet was nicknamed the crapper due to the invetor
    do we now go to the bathroom and take a giant gates?

  115. Hard enough to solve when you have money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dubai has problems with this.

    Right here in the San Francisco Bay area, Winter storms routinely wash sewage into the bay.

    These two examples are in areas that are considered "wealthy" or "advanced" or whatever you want to call it.

    One of the first steps in any engineering project is "state of the art review". Hopefully Gates hasn't forgotten that.

    FWIW, the Romans seemed to have found a pretty good use for urine. It's the solids that cause real problems. If you build a BFTank, you still have to empty it eventually.

    The final answer for Africa may not be "innovative" at all. It may be more cost effective and sanitary to close-over their existing open sewers, or to use a carrot/stick approach to get waste collectors to behave properly when tasked with delivering things to a disposal site. As far as engineering is concerned, it's all a solved problem. It's the social and political angle that's tough.

  116. Jewish people believe the same thing by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1
    The concept of doing charity without publicity or outward reward has a basis in Jewish faith practice.

    In other words, if Jesus was calling out the Pharisees for being overt in their charitable deeds, he was not challenging them with anything they would not have already known.

  117. Privacy concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one seeing huge potential privacy concerns with installing Windows on a toilet?

  118. The Humanure Handbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He should read this excellent book on humanure composting. http://weblife.org/humanure/

  119. Similar to Maimonides by sconeu · · Score: 2

    Very similar to Maimonides Eight levels of Charity. From highest to lowest:

    1. Teaching the needy so that they scan support themselves
    2. Anonymous giving without knowing who will be the recipient
    3. Donor knows who receives, recipient does not know who gives
    4. Donor does not know who receives, recipient knows who gave
    5. Giving directly to recipient, before being asked
    6. Giving directly to recipient after being asked
    7. Giving willingly, but insufficiently
    8. Giving unwillingly
    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  120. Blue Screen of Death (aka toilet panic) by prefec2 · · Score: 1

    If you ever used or in that particular case tried to use a plane toilet on a long distance flight or when you traveled in a brand new ICE 3 (German high speed train) after the first month of its deployment, than you know how such exception looks and smells like.

    However, I guess they will not built vacuum toilets, because this would require a lot of energy to create the vacuum and therefor the classic morning routine of a million people could crash the net as it is hard to predict when they finish and press the button.

  121. Outhouse Technology by FrankHS · · Score: 1

    I'm old enough to remember outhouse technology! I actually used it for several months. It worked, required no water, and was simple to construct.

    The major drawback was that you had to get up and go outside in the middle of the night. This was even more unpleasant when it was cold.

  122. That's Easy... by TaleSpinner · · Score: 1

    > I wonder what the toilet version of The Blue Screen of Death is.

    The Brown Screen of Death.

  123. The world does not have limited water resources. by blair1q · · Score: 1

    3/4ths of the planet's surface is 2 miles deep in water. You don't need fresh water to flush a toilet. Build these poor saps some pumping stations, you dope.

  124. Missing Obvious Solution... by SpongeBob+Hitler · · Score: 0

    Everyone is missing the obvious solution. The Japanese have developed a way to turn poop into steak. There is famine in Africa. Does anyone not see the connection? (my own modest proposal)

    --
    Wollt ihr den totalen Krieg?
  125. BSOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    General Pooping Fault at 0xFECE

  126. The e-toilet by FrankHS · · Score: 1

    It's been done!

    http://www.theonion.com/articles/new-etoilet-to-revolutionize-online-shitting,633/

    E-Toilet To Revolutionize Online Shitting

    Early e-toilets forced users to keep a lot of windows open, so e-dumpers lacked the kind of privacy you want while doing your business," said designer Peter Cheng, a self-described "whiz kid" who has put hundreds of gigaflops through the new e-toilet without once encountering the dreaded, bomb-emblazoned "Shit Failed" message.

    "With the new Advent e-toilet, cutting-edge cyberdump technology has finally arrived and is within reach for all Americans," said Scoscia, smiling. "The question is: Do you want to go today?"

  127. neither. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neither, they're both still adhering to Bronze Age Mythologies that was invented by ancient homicidal maniacs.

  128. Brown Splash of Death by backslashdot · · Score: 1

    Brown Splash of Death .. nasty, lol.

  129. BSOD 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From Teh OP- "I wonder what the toilet version of The Blue Screen of Death is."

    They can just ask Apple, who is the current owner of the BSOD. OSX Leoptard, what an epic disaster!

  130. Well, Gates is know for shitty engineering so... by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    this is just a natural progression.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  131. Do We Call It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The iLoo number 2 ?

  132. Summary Meta-Commentary Drives Me Crazy by DIplomatic · · Score: 1

    The meta-comments in the article summaries is getting out of hand. I just want to read 2 sentences about the content of this article without kdawson or whoever throwing in their snide 2-cents and shitting all over stories. (pun intended)

  133. Why not just use seawater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This may be a stupid question, but if there's a lack of fresh water, why not just use salt water from the sea for the sewer system? It should be easy to pump in pipelines from the Indian Ocean, in Kenya's case. A toilet wouldn't be worse off just because the water in it is undrinkable.

    I'm sure I've missed something really obvious, but I'd love if someone pointed out what.

  134. Too late! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple already re-invented the toilet with the iPad.

    Pooping has never been so fun.

  135. Re:Silly Gates.... by nschubach · · Score: 1

    The problem isn't really efficiency though. The cities where this is happening don't have to social or economic structures to handle those systems. Sure, it may stay running well for a few years but if something breaks they are not likely to go out and replace it with only genuine replacement parts. Someone will cobble together a rubber mat and some string to fix that pipe. Even in western civilization, there are people who don't have the money or the education to properly repair their plumbing/electricity/etc. and they duct tape it all to hell because that's what they have on hand.

    --
    Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  136. It also wasn't a DOS created limitation by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    It was an 8086 real mode limitation. The Intel 8086 had 20 address lines, giving a total of 1MB of memory that they could address (in 64k segments). So right there for anything running in purely 16-bit real mode, you have a 1MB limit. Well you had other things that needed memory addresses as well, like VRAM and BIOS and so on. As such the memory was split, 640k for OS and programs, 384k upper memory.

    The problem remained for so long because we kept running in real mode. In fact, it is still around. Run an Intel processor in real mode (they all will, even 2nd Core i processors) and you still have access to only 1MB of RAM directly in 64k segments. You have to use EMS or XMS to access more RAM.

    All that went away with protected mode, fully introduced on the 80386, which has a 4GB flat memory architecture. Now we are hitting that limit and ones related to it (on 32-bit system you'll find less than 4GB usable because again, VRAM, PCIe cards and so on take up memory) and of course there's long mode, which has a 64-bit address space for new CPUs.

    1. Re:It also wasn't a DOS created limitation by snemarch · · Score: 1

      Just to be pedantic: we can actually address almost 64kb above 1mb in 16bit rm, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_memory_area , Furthermore, on 386 and later CPUs, tricks can be employed to enter "unreal mode", "flat real mode" (etc.) so your code is still running 16bit realmode, but you have access to the full 32bit address space.

      The there's PAE, introduced on the PPro well before the x64 architecture, which allows the use of "quite a bit more than 4gb" in 32bit mode - but of course only addressing 4gb at once, mapping the additional physical memory not entirely unlike how we mapped EMS or XMS back in the days. PAE also means it's no trouble at all utilizing a full 4GB physical memory on a 32bit OS, Windows (for some reasons - a few good, a lot not so good) won't let you use PHYSICAL_ADDRESSes > 4GB since XP SP1 (pre-SP1 it was 4gb physical memory total, not phy_addr limited).

      --
      Coffee-driven development.
  137. As much as I hate Microsoft by Noitatsidem · · Score: 1

    To be completely fair, BSOD-like failures happen in all operating systems, although windows ME, and Vista (pre service pack) certainly were notorious for this.

    --
    Feel free to mod me down, just know that unlike some Anonymous Cowards I'm not afraid to express my views as myself.
  138. But he's been doing that all along... by knarf · · Score: 1

    The toilet here on my farm sports a 'Designed for Windows XP' logo, as does the toilet paper holder so he must be building on previous experience here...

    --
    --frank[at]unternet.org
  139. project vapoorize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jack black already invented vapoorize

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpads8s5mik

    how about helping these people relocate somewhere they can find water and plant food? if they want to live where there's not enough water to flush a toilet that's fine but they need a vasectomy or forfeit their children, no adult should be allowed bring a child into that environment that's just encouraging cruelty

    hard to convince an american there's not enough water to flush a toilet when we have rivers flooding, water parks, public fountains, sprinkler systems on golf courses and lawns, water towers and fire hydrants every direction you look

    wrong location, wrong priority, wrong sequence

    if I had to guess what's corrupt about this, I'd say it's about finding a way to exploit the poor, why give them a permanent solution like water and sewage as public services like the rest of earth when you can repeatedly sell some product, why move them near water or water near them when you can sell a bottle of vapoorize?

  140. No easy answers .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Providing sewage treatment for almost a million people isn't easy when there's hardly any existing infrastructure or easily accessible power. There are probably cultural issues too like exist in south east Asia. If you've always dumped outdoors, dumping indoors feels ... "wrong." That is just one cultural difficulty. There are certainly others.

    I'm hardly a Microsoft lover - Linux is my daily use OS - but I'm extremely pleased that the Gates Foundation is working on this issue. They have the resources to get the knowledgeable people involved and the political clout to work through some approvals.

  141. Truly the man for the job. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Decades of experience in shit delivery.

  142. yes it will run crysis by goombah99 · · Score: 2
    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  143. BSOD == BFOC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brown fountain of crap?

  144. Uncool man by andsens · · Score: 1

    "I wonder what the toilet version of The Blue Screen of Death is."
    That was uncalled for.

  145. Toilets of Japan by jawahar · · Score: 1

    I believe Gates is influenced/impressed by https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Toilets_in_Japan

  146. ideal for the day after a curry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seeing as microsoft are already used to dealing with the red ring of death

  147. It already exist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called Composting Toilet and doesn't require water.

  148. Reasons... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Did you ever have to dig several deep holes, then build wooden structures over them - just so people could shit all over your work?
    Did you have to do it for free?

    Digging holes is hard work. Building wooden outhouses is less hard but it still has costs in tools and resources.
    Both activities require compensation of some kind. Preferably monetary, with the rock-bottom price being somewhere around what you'd have to pay for about 4000 calories per worker.
    But you will most likely have to pay a lot more than the rock-bottom price on account of that being hard work.
    Repeat that every couple of weeks/months depending on the population numbers divided by the number of holes.

    And that can add up to be quite a cost for an extremely poor community.

    I know it's somewhat cruel and elitist, but I often can't understand the dynamics of these places in Africa... if you have these millions of desperately starving children, WHY do they keep having children?? And, if "we", the outside world, keep providing food don't we realize that we're just creating an unmanageable problem? If you have 10M people that can't feed themselves, so you feel sorry and give them food, you'll just end up with 20M that can't feed themselves on the budget of 10M persons worth of food you provide... thus you must provide even more food...

    Humans are not perfectly rational automatons. Well... not counting the psychos.
    That's regarding your "WHY do they keep having children?" question.

    As for "our compassion to save millions of starving people will only serve to create TENS of million of future starving people" - it doesn't work that way.
    You are working with an assumption that people in those countries are "just like you only poor".
    Thing is... most of those extremely poor are closer to your ancestors 10000 years ago than to you.
    Culturally, educationally and most important in this case - regarding health and life expectancy.
    There are places in Africa where a 40-year-old man is a rarity - most people die long before that.

    Only way for ANY humans to survive in such conditions is to start breeding like mad. Propagate the species, follow the instincts of the hunter-gatherer.

    By providing food and medicines to those people and raising their standard of living you are not creating "TENS of million of future starving people" - you are providing a window for generations to be raised in conditions good enough so that they can dedicate resources to more than just eating, sleeping and breeding.
    Instead, they can work on their education and ways of solving their problems so you will not have to provide more help in the future but less or no help at all.

    Naturally, that education (and other forms of help) will have to be provided too.
    You can't expect of them to "come up" with all the civilizational advancements on their own once they are not hungry and sick any more.

    Why?
    Well, besides most humans not being heartless bastards (or perfectly rational automatons) there are also perfectly rational reasons.
    You need those people, their land, their resources, their workforce.
    And no. Just killing them off or enslaving them wont work.
    You need their genetic adaptations to the environment as well (can't kill them unless you want your 1st world ass to live in their 3rd world conditions yourself) and enslaving them does not solve any of the problems that are there already - it only makes them YOUR problems.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  149. An interesting book about Sanitation by gadders · · Score: 1

    If anyone is interested in Sanitation (possibly a niche topic, I realise) they could do worse than read The Big Necessity by Rose George.

    It's amazing some of the things we take for granted in the West - for instance the teenage "untouchable" girls in India whose job is to literally scrape up other people's shit and dispose of it.

  150. The World Toilet Crisis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have a chance, watch "The World Toilet Crisis" on Vanguard TV.
    http://current.com/shows/vanguard/92481294_hunting-for-human-waste-scenes-from-vanguard.htm

    Mr. Gates is addressing a serious problem, and he is far from the only one doing so.

  151. Re:The world does not have limited water resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pumping saltwater is much more difficult than pumping freshwater. It's corrosive.