Slashdot Mirror


5.8 Earthquake Hits East Coast of the US

At 1:51 p.m. EDT a 5.8 magnitude earthquake hit Virginia (map of reported tremors). Reports indicate it was felt along most of the east coast (my monitor and floor definitely wobbled a bit down here in Raleigh NC) with reported evacuations of government buildings at least in DC. QuantumPion noted that the North Anna Nuclear Generating Station is located only a few miles from the epicenter, and the NRC has confirmed the plant automatically shut down with no apparent damage. For folks who like that sort of thing, there is a hashtag on Twitter, and the WSJ has a page with live updates on the situation.

614 comments

  1. Boston by Altus · · Score: 1

    Felt it here, third floor of a building. Nothing more here than a gentle sway back and forth 3-4 times.

    --

    "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    1. Re:Boston by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About the same on 5th floor NYC, though we went back and forth probably 8-9 times.

    2. Re:Boston by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We felt it in my office, here in Ohio, and it doesn't even have a few floors to amplify the wobble.

    3. Re:Boston by trum4n · · Score: 1

      Same, Pittsburgh.

    4. Re:Boston by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Alexandria Va, felt/sounded like loud washing machine @ first, place got a little wobbly. Didnt seem to get too bad (at least nothing in the area was damaged).

      Apparently there was some serious damage out in the Tysons Corner area though.

    5. Re:Boston by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Philly, 4th floor. We had a few books fall off of the shelf.

    6. Re:Boston by blair1q · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you're in the Back Bay. It's an old landfill, and it sloshes when the bedrock moves even a little. It's like living on a seismometer.

    7. Re:Boston by anarkavre · · Score: 1

      I'm in Pittsburgh too. A bit to the north. That was awesome!

      --
      "Without curiosity and knowledge, the mind is a vast void. Without the mind, curiosity and knowledge are nonexistent."
    8. Re:Boston by flink · · Score: 2

      That's where I am, right across from the Prudential Plaza. Definitely felt it here.

    9. Re:Boston by trum4n · · Score: 1

      i agree. but i wasn't going to pick that shitstorm. somebody's about to abuse us both because their dog died in a real earthquake.

    10. Re:Boston by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My dog DID die in an earthquake you sensitive clod!

    11. Re:Boston by electron+sponge · · Score: 1

      Felt it in Buffalo, 15-20 seconds swaying, 5 stories up.

    12. Re:Boston by trum4n · · Score: 1

      wow, meme fail.

    13. Re:Boston by blair1q · · Score: 1

      There's an earthen dam about 10 miles east of the epicenter. Right next to a town called Bumpass. Bumpass, Virginia. Lovely part of the world. Soon to be under water.

    14. Re:Boston by leucadiadude · · Score: 3, Funny

      There is already a wiki entry for the earthquake: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Virginia_earthquake

      "The 2011 Virginia earthquake was a magnitude 5.9 (Mw) intraplate earthquake that occurred on August 23, 2011. Steven Seagal ate too many cheeseburgers that day and jumped heavily on the ground, causing the initial earthquake. The focus is reported by the USGS to be about 64 km (39 mi) northwest of Richmond, Virginia near the town of Mineral, Virginia."

    15. Re:Boston by drodal · · Score: 1

      Here in South Boston on 'A' street. Felt a slight shake twice for about 15-20 secs.

    16. Re:Boston by gorzek · · Score: 1

      Felt it here in northern New Jersey. Just kind of a gentle back-and-forth swaying. I've lived through quakes in Alaska so this was a pretty mild one by comparison.

    17. Re:Boston by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worse than I'd imagined.

    18. Re:Boston by PopeScott · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I felt on the second floor of my home in Dayton. I couldn't believe it was the VA quake at first.

    19. Re:Boston by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 1

      As someone who lives in the area, I'm not too happy about that. Hopefully if it were to be busted I'll be far enough away from it for it not to matter.

      --
      SSC
    20. Re:Boston by attah · · Score: 1

      Sp tell me... Is it bump-ass or bum-pass?

    21. Re:Boston by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Southern NH, 2nd floor of a large office building - gentle ripple / "sway" in the floor, motion felt almost like somebody a few cubicles away was bouncing their leg, but bouncing it really slowly.

      Honestly, thought it was just somebody rolling something heavy across the floor until we got an email about 45 minutes later from our continuity planners saying, "There was a minor earthquake in the DC area, reports from employees that it was felt in North Carolina, Boston, and New Hampshire - no effect on corporate facilities or injuries reported."

    22. Re:Boston by Alyred · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm always surprised at the news generated by such low-richter-value quakes... 6.0's were not uncommon when I was growing up in Anchorage. But then I realize that none of the buildings in the areas were really built for that... nor have the people experienced such regular occurrences.

    23. Re:Boston by Divebus · · Score: 2

      Felt it here in DC. I was in the can, intimately connected to the building so to speak. Felt every rattle and toss, about the same dynamics as riding the Metro for 20 secnods. On the 2nd floor of a 10 story building, corner of M and 17th N.W.

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    24. Re:Boston by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm between the Pru and Boston Common. Felt like a freight train lumbering by.

    25. Re:Boston by OffaMyLawn · · Score: 1

      Felt it here in the northern panhandle of West Virginia. Thought I was going crazy at first, until some people started hitting me up on our instant messaging system asking me if my house was shaking. Talked to people from here all the way to and including Pittsburgh. Freaked me out a bit. Never felt one before.

    26. Re:Boston by MoriaOrc · · Score: 2

      As a Southern Californian, this made my day.

    27. Re:Boston by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      [citation required]

    28. Re:Boston by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      About right. Some bricks fell off of buildings in downtown Baltimore, and the USGov closed down (any excuse?) but no reported injuries.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    29. Re:Boston by trebach · · Score: 1

      It's Bum-pass

    30. Re:Boston by blair1q · · Score: 1

      They probably say something closer to bumpus.

    31. Re:Boston by styrotech · · Score: 1

      Both - it can be a bit hit or miss ;)

    32. Re:Boston by CrazyDuke · · Score: 1

      With Norfolk (naw-FUCK), Suffolk (suh-FUCK), Assawoman (Ass-o-woman), and several others, I would not bet on that.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    33. Re:Boston by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 2
      Well, it all depends doesn't it? A small shallow earthquake, near the "right" kind of soil/terrain can feel much much much larger than a large deep one, and have larger effects and cause more damage.

      The [Richter scale] values are typical only and should be taken with extreme caution, since intensity and thus ground effects depend not only on the magnitude, but also on the distance to the epicenter, the depth of the earthquake's focus beneath the epicenter, and geological conditions (certain terrains can amplify seismic signals).

      And, as you say, it's more likely to make the news if it's a rare event for the area...

    34. Re:Boston by styrotech · · Score: 1

      You'd know all about a Magnitude 5.8 at 6km depth if you were nearby.

      An MM intensity of VII is nothing to sneeze at - luckily most heavily populated areas were far enough away to only feel MM IV.

    35. Re:Boston by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      I always felt uncomfortable saying Norfolk in polite company, half afraid I was mispronouncing it. It is good to hear that I am not, and that Va really does have some crazy location names.

    36. Re:Boston by TheInternetGuy · · Score: 0

      Yes, in a way the system we have here in Japan that describes the localized destructive energy instead makes more sense. All though it felt very unfamiliar at first.

      --
      If my comment didn't sound as good in your head as it did in mine, then I guess we all know who's to blame
    37. Re:Boston by dwye · · Score: 1

      To the east, instead. Embarrassingly, I missed it, entirely.

      OTOH, my sister, who spent 15 years in Southern CA before returning to the Burgh, picked it up, and figured out its local rating to +- 0.2. Experience helps, I guess.

    38. Re:Boston by bronney · · Score: 1

      pics or it didn't happen..

    39. Re:Boston by NekSnappa · · Score: 1

      As a So. Californian who now lives in So. Maryland. I have to say that people really over reacted out here.
      I didn't even notice it until the window blinds started rattling.

      --
      I want to shoot the messenger!
    40. Re:Boston by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stationed in Tokyo, so hearing about one quake freaking a bunch of people out makes me laugh a little. Japan builds their building to withstand quakes. And Typhoons.

      (And yes, I understand that there are a ton of earthquakes in Japan, but still.)

    41. Re:Boston by ls671 · · Score: 1

      Note that underground where you are located during a quake is important in relation to how you feel it.

      My house was located and it had its foundations on a rock mountain during a quake and I only felt it for about half a second, like if I had been moved a few inches then back to my position. Nothing fell in the house or was broken.

      A friend of mine living 3 miles away at a less elevated altitude where the rock is covered with a tick layer of dirt that behaves like jello during a quake felt the same quake for 1 minute. He had to hold to his aquarium so it wouldn't fall off its stand and he had stuff falling down to the floor in his house. The next day, newspaper had pictures of stores in his immediate area with stuff that had fallen off shelves so it wasn't my friend trying to kid me ;-)

      Epicenter was about 150 miles away. So you may fell the quake quite differently depending on the underground where you stand, even if the distance is negligible compared to the epicenter distance.

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    42. Re:Boston by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Bah, that was dated 2010.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    43. Re:Boston by Alyred · · Score: 1

      Totally agreed. My post wasn't really meant as a "haha, you people get worked up over nothing" as it was a "take it in perspective and look at the terrain".

      Most of the quakes I remember growing up had some pretty severe sudden horizontal "jerks" (best way I can describe it) and I think it'd do a lot more damage if most of the construction hadn't been done post-1964.

      Anchorage proper had a higher amplification of the effects, as compared to the surrounding areas due to the fact it was built on a giant tidal flat/sandbar.

    44. Re:Boston by Alyred · · Score: 1

      Oh, trust me... I've felt lots and lots of earthquakes, at all sorts of depths.

    45. Re:Boston by tdknox · · Score: 1

      You work at NatGeo too I guess.

      --
      Did you know that gullible is not in the dictionary?
  2. HOW THE HELL? by The+Dawn+Of+Time · · Score: 5, Funny

    How did this make Slashdot already? Nothing makes this site for weeks.

    1. Re:HOW THE HELL? by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      Global warming emergency flash!!

    2. Re:HOW THE HELL? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      It was trojaned in a submission about condom thickness.

    3. Re:HOW THE HELL? by nomadic · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is actually talking about a 1997 earthquake.

    4. Re:HOW THE HELL? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What you just felt was just the aftershock. The original one occurred last week, but during the morning hours so no geek was awake to notice it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:HOW THE HELL? by Tharsman · · Score: 1

      Maybe we are confusing earthquake reports? There was another earthquake in the area about a year ago...

    6. Re:HOW THE HELL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Earth, why does it hate us?

    7. Re:HOW THE HELL? by magarity · · Score: 1

      No, WHY did it make slashdot - we had a 5.*9* in Colorado last night and no news about that.
       
      Still, I'm waiting for the 6.0 in Texas tomorrow, because, you know, everything in Texas is bigger.

    8. Re:HOW THE HELL? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      How did this make Slashdot already? Nothing makes this site for weeks.

      The Earthquake happened before Apple did anything Slashdot could spin today.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    9. Re:HOW THE HELL? by LWATCDR · · Score: 2

      Why did it hit Slashdot? Because it effected Va, Washington DC, NY, Oh, Pa, Ma, and goodness knows how many other states. Total population effected well many times the population of Co.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    10. Re:HOW THE HELL? by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      Bush's Fault.

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    11. Re:HOW THE HELL? by dkf · · Score: 1

      No, WHY did it make slashdot - we had a 5.*9* in Colorado last night and no news about that.

      It depends on how well the buildings in the area are built to withstand that sort of shaking. If buildings are all made to take it, that sort of earthquake is no big deal, but if they aren't (much more likely the case in DC, where substantial earthquakes aren't too common) then it's a major story because of the disruption.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  3. Felt it here - Bewildering by displague · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I felt it in Southern New Jersey. Everyone was dumb founded for a little while - "Whose shaking the cubicle wall?" Then everyone ended up outside with no cell service. After a few minutes we all hit the web and that was also saturated. Natural disaster practice test.

    --
    Marques Johansson
    1. Re:Felt it here - Bewildering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm right near you, working from home today. My dog was barking just before everything started shaking.

    2. Re:Felt it here - Bewildering by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      Use google voice or skype to make calls, that seems a lot more reliable-- and a lot "friendlier" to the cell towers.

    3. Re:Felt it here - Bewildering by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 2

      Felt it in North Jersey. My cats slept through it.

    4. Re:Felt it here - Bewildering by quarterbuck · · Score: 1

      Felt it in Connecticut too. 3 out of 6 people in the room felt it, other did not.
      Twitter already had news of this (reporting epicenter as Virginia) within the next 3 minutes, so we all went back to work. Mostly Manhattanites in skyscrapers tweeting.
      Bloomberg, WSJ (blog) and Washington Post had news updated in the next few minutes in that order too.

      --
      http://slashdot.org/submission/1062723/Cheap-mobile-data-plan?art_pos=2
    5. Re:Felt it here - Bewildering by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Did anyone turn on their radio?

      No one here did :P

    6. Re:Felt it here - Bewildering by Jeng · · Score: 2

      Texts will almost always go though. They will go though when the phone lines are jammed and the data connections are flooded.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    7. Re:Felt it here - Bewildering by chill · · Score: 2

      And yet many people here in D.C. got "maximum number of retries exceeded" messages from their Verizon Blackberries.

      It took about 15 minutes for service to get restored to the point data and SMS was available. Slightly longer for voice.

      Sprint worked, though. For both customers.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    8. Re:Felt it here - Bewildering by mapkinase · · Score: 2

      The first place to go is definitely Twitter. Major news media caught up 5-10 min later.

      The diversity of locations was mapped out in min or two.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    9. Re:Felt it here - Bewildering by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      person I knew right outside of DC had her phone go completely out of service. Verizon, of course.

      Scary since cell is the infrastructure of today's phones.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    10. Re:Felt it here - Bewildering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i farted right before the earthquake. conincidence?

    11. Re:Felt it here - Bewildering by MightyMartian · · Score: 0

      More likely your mom taking it from the mail man

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    12. Re:Felt it here - Bewildering by Relayman · · Score: 1

      "15 minutes for service to get restored" You mean, 15 minutes for everyone to stop trying to call at once. I doubt that there was any outage, just congestion.

      --
      If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
    13. Re:Felt it here - Bewildering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      person I knew right outside of DC had her phone go completely out of service. Verizon, of course. Scary since cell is the infrastructure of today's phones.

      Land lines would get swamped during earthquakes too. Do you really expect phone companies to have so much extra unused capacity that they never hit a peak they can't handle?

    14. Re:Felt it here - Bewildering by sakshale · · Score: 1

      Do you have a radio to turn on?

      --
      For every problem there is a solution that is simple, obvious and wrong.
    15. Re:Felt it here - Bewildering by armanox · · Score: 1

      I tried to find out information on the shortwave, I'm not too good with it though...

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    16. Re:Felt it here - Bewildering by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Except if you have Verizon, they route Skype through voice...freaking idiots...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    17. Re:Felt it here - Bewildering by isorox · · Score: 1

      The first place to go is definitely Twitter. Major news media caught up 5-10 min later.

      The diversity of locations was mapped out in min or two.

      We know this from https://www.xkcd.com/723/

    18. Re:Felt it here - Bewildering by LurkerXXX · · Score: 4, Informative

      Um, No.

      The place to go is: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/

      They had it the epicenter mapped within a few seconds of me feeling the shaking. It's kinda what they do.

      You can contribute info by filling out their online survey:

      http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/dyfi/

      And you can sign up for notifications at:

      https://sslearthquake.usgs.gov/ens/

    19. Re:Felt it here - Bewildering by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      You are right. That was actually the first place to go. But uor me it was faster to go to twitter (I did not remember the exact usgs site, so I had to use google search using key words), besides twitter gave me the quick geographical spectrum. Within a minute I knew that the shock was felt from Raleigh to Ontario. usgs does not tell you that.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    20. Re:Felt it here - Bewildering by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      No, but it does give you a picture of the spectrum within the key area. Shakemap!

      http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/shakemap/

    21. Re:Felt it here - Bewildering by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      True, I saw bars but didn't get through
      I tried texting, but that was a pain because of a coincidental hardware issue with my phone's keypads.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    22. Re:Felt it here - Bewildering by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Duh, yeah, in the car. Once we're out of the building, the next step is to go home.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    23. Re:Felt it here - Bewildering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In DC 17th and K NW, I made about 15 calls and about 10 google voice messages with my Sprint phone with no problems. I had maybe 3 drop but that could have been the people I was calling. I let other people use my Sprint phone because their Verizon was not working and my own work supplied Verizon Droid was not getting spotty data and voice. My guess is not that Sprint has a better network but probably just less users. Fine with me!

  4. Felt it here in DC by tinkerghost · · Score: 1

    I work 3rd shift & was woken up with stuff falling from the shelves. First earthquake I actually felt.

    1. Re:Felt it here in DC by csubi · · Score: 1

      Just curious : do you happen to be close to Richmond, Va? It was perceptible but nothing more here in Bethesda, MD.

    2. Re:Felt it here in DC by tinkerghost · · Score: 1

      Um, don't really know. I'm working contract work in DC so I'm not familiar with the area (From MA) I'm about 5 miles from capitol building.

    3. Re:Felt it here in DC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im right across the river from you in Merrifield, VA. The four story building I'm in swayed for a good 10 seconds.

    4. Re:Felt it here in DC by b0bby · · Score: 1

      I'm 10 miles north of the DC Beltway - shook the building for a good 10-15 seconds plus some aftershocks. Knocked some frames off my bookshelf & sloshed about half an inch of water out of my fish tank. A coworker was driving & she thought her car mas going to explode until she saw the van next to her shaking also. Pretty strong - I grew up around here & never felt anything like it.

    5. Re:Felt it here in DC by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2

      I felt it all the way in Austin, TX!

      No, wait, I'm just drunk. Nevermind!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    6. Re:Felt it here in DC by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      You're in a very stable building then... by Dulles our building walls were visibly shaking on a single floor building. The guys working the water pipes in the parking lot were freaking out. Quite funny for someone who spent a long while in CA to feel an earthquake of any size in VA.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    7. Re:Felt it here in DC by wintercolby · · Score: 1

      I'm in Charlottesville, VA. We certainly felt it here. Many of my Richmond friends are posting to Facebook about it, so it was significant there, too.

      --
      Most ignorance is vincible ignorance. We don't know because we don't want to know. --Aldous Huxley
    8. Re:Felt it here in DC by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Downtown Richmond, here. Lots of rattling and shaking. Didn't see any damage, but it panicked quite a few people. The Dominion Power building and the Federal Reserve were evacuated for the better part of an hour.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    9. Re:Felt it here in DC by csubi · · Score: 1

      Apparently it was felt stronger around the Capitol in DC than 15 miles north of it at the NIH, in Bethesda.

    10. Re:Felt it here in DC by Pope · · Score: 1

      You probably just felt the one that was in Denver earlier ;)

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    11. Re:Felt it here in DC by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 1

      I live within 30 minutes or so from the epicenter, and here it was kind of scary. No damage, but damn were the floors and walls shaking! I thought it had to be a tornado at first with all the noise.

      --
      SSC
    12. Re:Felt it here in DC by csubi · · Score: 1

      Thanks for this bit of info! This is what I wanted to find out, what it was like close to the epicenter. It definitely did not feel like 5.9 in DC Metro area, as CNN headline said .

    13. Re:Felt it here in DC by gatorpk · · Score: 1

      I was working in Reston, VA outside of Washington, DC and we experienced very strong shaking. We had to evacuate our building for the day pending structural inspections. Cell phone service was out for a while but Twitter and the Web worked fine the entire time.

    14. Re:Felt it here in DC by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Severn, MD. I was in a one story building, everything moved from side to side a few times, there was even a "preshock" that others felt but I did not. The walls of the building were most definitely moving back and forth and we lost some light fixtures. You must have been in a car or something...

      Heck, I even heard on the news that a car flipped on 32 and 95.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    15. Re:Felt it here in DC by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Biggest recorded quake in the MD area (since 1800s) was 2.6, this totally shattered that record.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    16. Re:Felt it here in DC by trebach · · Score: 1

      Richmond here as well, near the Coliseum. We evacuated the building as well. At least one coworker was panicking but we brought her downstairs with us. I didn't see the Biotech buildings evacuating though.

    17. Re:Felt it here in DC by styrotech · · Score: 1

      That's because a 5.9 doesn't "feel" like a specific amount of shaking. The 5.9 quoted is the Magnitude of the quake not the Intensity. The Intensity is a measure of what you'd feel.

      Looking at the USGS info, in DC the intensity was roughly MM IV which isn't much to worry about, but towns closer to the epicenter felt MM VII which is a fairly big scary shake - especially for people not used to it and buildings not designed for it.

    18. Re:Felt it here in DC by hamburgler007 · · Score: 1

      I hope your fish is okay.

    19. Re:Felt it here in DC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite funny for someone who spent a long while in CA to feel an earthquake of any size in VA.

      Now you know how we feel when we see all your cars in CA sliding off the highway because of a little rain.

    20. Re:Felt it here in DC by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Was next to FairOaks mall (Fairfax, VA). Thought it was heavy traffic at first, but scooted out the door about 5 sec into it. Spent a year of my life in CA and never felt one...this was my first ever.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    21. Re:Felt it here in DC by skydyr · · Score: 1

      Um... There was an earthquake centered near Frederick, MD just last year that was around 4.0, as I recall, which is hardly far away.

    22. Re:Felt it here in DC by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I am working off of what was being said on the news. I don't exactly have the record books in front of me. But according to the USGS, the historical record was 2.5

      http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/states/historical_state.php#maryland

      But then the Maryland Geological Survey says 3.5 was the previous earthquake (not record)

      http://www.mgs.md.gov/esic/brochures/earthquake.html

      and shows a 4.5 in the same general area as this recent quake.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  5. I felt it in upstate New York by moosehooey · · Score: 1

    I was sitting at my desk and everything swayed a little bit...

    1. Re:I felt it in upstate New York by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i was reading the bible and had the news playing on tv when the couch I was sitting in felt like it was moving. I thought my son was shaking the couch or the dog was scratching and leaning on the couch at the same time. I called my son but he was in his room and then the dog came running from the kitchen. One minute later , breaking news showed up on tv that wash dc hit by earthquake....wow....I thought (hoped ) I was being moved by the words of the Bible.lol.....Im in Utica NY.

    2. Re:I felt it in upstate New York by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      Well, here all of the Christians disappeared. You must have been reading the wrong version or something.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:I felt it in upstate New York by camperdave · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was sitting on my bar stool and everything stopped swaying for a little bit.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    4. Re:I felt it in upstate New York by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      You win an internet for that one.

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
  6. I've seen reports in NC and Montreal as well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This one was felt by quite a few people...

    1. Re:I've seen reports in NC and Montreal as well... by PIBM · · Score: 1

      It was well recorded on the University Laval (Quebec) seismograph:

      http://www2.ggl.ulaval.ca/seismographe_r.html

    2. Re:I've seen reports in NC and Montreal as well... by uniquename72 · · Score: 1

      And apparently everyone who felt it feels the need to come to /. and say, "Hey, I felt it!"

    3. Re:I've seen reports in NC and Montreal as well... by Cinder6 · · Score: 2

      Oh yeah? I'm in California, and I didn't feel it!

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    4. Re:I've seen reports in NC and Montreal as well... by LoP_XTC · · Score: 1

      And apparently everyone who felt it feels the need to come to /. and say, "Hey, I felt it!"

      This is /. ... its about the only time they get post about someone saying "They felt it!" ...

      --
      "Curiouser and Curiouser...." -Alice
    5. Re:I've seen reports in NC and Montreal as well... by dreemernj · · Score: 1

      I'm in New Jersey. I felt it. If you're from California, you probably wouldn't have noticed it.

      --
      1 (short ton / firkin) = 89.1432354 slugs / keg
  7. felt it in NYC by alen · · Score: 1

    desk started moving under my feet. not the first time so no big deal

    all the chicks that work in the building here that is full of fashion and modeling companies got scared and evacuated right away

    1. Re:felt it in NYC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Standing on your desk isn't a great place to be during an earthquake.

    2. Re:felt it in NYC by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      And you didn't offer to console them or help them to ensure that none of them were injured. WHAT WERE YOU THINKING?

      --
      Time to offend someone
    3. Re:felt it in NYC by itsenrique · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up: OP's gripe sounds more like a great opportunity.

    4. Re:felt it in NYC by proto · · Score: 1

      desk started moving under my feet. not the first time so no big deal

      all the chicks that work in the building here that is full of fashion and modeling companies got scared and evacuated right away

      I felt it in upper Manhattan. The building did a slight sway back and forth. First time I ever experience that. But Manhattan land is on solid bedrock, how could the quake effect reach here?

    5. Re:felt it in NYC by alen · · Score: 1

      married with 2 kids here, i'm just hoping my older son felt it. last year's tornado went right over our apartment building while he was looking outside the window. and an earthquake is one natural disaster he has wanted to experience

    6. Re:felt it in NYC by alen · · Score: 1

      the energy can travel through rock

    7. Re:felt it in NYC by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I felt it in upper Manhattan. The building did a slight sway back and forth. First time I ever experience that. But Manhattan land is on solid bedrock, how could the quake effect reach here?

      That's exactly how. Earthquakes travel from their epicenter by wave propagation. A nice, dense, more-or-less-continuous medium is perfect for that. If you were in a largish building, the building was probably even resting on/coupled with the bedrock to keep it from shifting in the dirt above. A tuning fork welded to a beam, and somebody hitting the far end with a sledgehammer...

      Unstable media can be dangerous in earthquakes, because they have the nasty habit of exhibiting liquefaction; but solid media transmit the waves quite well.

    8. Re:felt it in NYC by imgumbydamnit · · Score: 1

      1440 Broadway? I'm on an upper floor.

      --
      To err is human. To arr is pirate.
    9. Re:felt it in NYC by Tharsman · · Score: 1

      ...

      Chick full of fashion and modeling companies....

      Its not the first time y our desk moves under your feet....

      Hmmm... sounds like you are a lucky man!

    10. Re:felt it in NYC by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      But Manhattan land is on solid bedrock, how could the quake effect reach here?

      The whole east coast is relatively solid bedrock, that's exactly why the earthquakes travel so far compared to the west coast.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    11. Re:felt it in NYC by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      by moving the bedrock?
      After all, that's what everything is on, underneath of the dirt.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    12. Re:felt it in NYC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're right across the river (Jersey City) and felt it. I think we were confused at first but then an exec said "This building was built for this stuff, go back to your desks." Weird thing is, the building guys confirmed it. Seems We're on a fault line no one knew about.

      Still, I wouldn't blame anyone in a skyscraper, especially in NYC, for evacuating. Most of us were afraid because we figured it was either an earthquake or a terrorist attack. Neither one could be fun 58 floors up in Manhattan. I'd rather be paranoid and alive than confident and dead.

    13. Re:felt it in NYC by magarity · · Score: 1

      but then an exec said "This building was built for this stuff, go back to your desks."

      Well better luck next time; there should be a hurricane coming by later in the week.

    14. Re:felt it in NYC by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      love and marriage, love and marriage...go together like a horse and carriage...

    15. Re:felt it in NYC by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      But Manhattan land is on solid bedrock, how could the quake effect reach here?

      Heard a geologist on the radio this morning say that east coast quakes can normally be felt farther away because of the fact that the ground is more solid.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  8. Columbia SC Felt the quake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    see subject

  9. Chicago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I felt something over here in Chicago. Didn't know if it was an earthquake though.

  10. No wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I was wondering why my drink was moving left too right. Can anyone here who knows geology explain their reason for thinking that there may be another quake or not another quake? I am talking about a timeframe of today. NYC, shaking here felt like when you are about to faint and dizzy, a slight nudging left to right.

    1. Re:No wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Exactly how I felt. I've never felt an earthquake before, having lived in the northeast US all of my life. We shook 3-4 times in the space of a few seconds. The first 2 times I thought something was wrong with me, and by the time the 4th movement came I was looking around to see objects shaking as well. I was definitely relieved to know that I wasn't experiencing something medical, but then alarmed because I didn't know if it'd get worse or what in the next few seconds. Glad it stopped! :-)

    2. Re:No wonder by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      I dont think they can predict such things.

      Incidentally, this WAS "another quake", as it looks like there was a 5.8 earlier today in colorado.

    3. Re:No wonder by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      >> I was wondering why my drink was moving left too right.

      Bond? James Bond?

    4. Re:No wonder by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Tension builds along a fault until one of the tense spots gives way. This releases the rock on either side of the fault to slide. It may catch on something as it does, creating tension again. Usually, the thing that catches is a lot less sticky than the original thing that broke free, and the things behind it aren't as stable either, so it breaks sooner, generally within minutes, hours, or days. The resulting swarm of earthquakes is called aftershocks. Their timing and size is no more predictable than the original quake. There will likely be none that can be felt in NYC, though.

      If, however, the thing that broke was holding back a much bigger sticking point that was also on the verge of breaking free, it may have been a foreshock for a quake that will really make the news. The east coast does zero, or nearly zero, building for earthquake survivability, unlike the California coast or Japan. A 5.0 in NYC would be like a 7.0-8.0 in SF.

      Shortly after the 9.0 off the Japanese coast in March, there was a 6.8 just a few miles from Tokyo. Almost nobody knows about the latter quake. Partly because they were all being mesmerized by the Tsunami at that point, and partly because there was a swarm of 6-7 magnitude quakes from the southern end of Japan to well north of the original quake, and partly because that sort of thing happens all the time there. People focus on just the big one.

    5. Re:No wonder by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      That quake was not related, too far away.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    6. Re:No wonder by Pope · · Score: 1

      It was shaken, not shtirred.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    7. Re:No wonder by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      Normally you'd expect further aftershocks, but mostly small ones - and given that this was a small one in itself (roughly 1/1000th of the big Japanese one) you probably won't notice them. The really big ones (think the mag 9 in Japan) can have comparably big aftershocks, but the small ones aren't too much of a worry.

      The magnitude/frequency ratio with earthquakes follows a fairly well established power law. The very small ones happen daily, even hourly, but the really big ones only happen every decade or so.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    8. Re:No wonder by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      This was not a slip fault like CA or a subduction fault like Japan. It's a stress fault in the middle of plate. So 'tension' is not built up via sliding. The pressure is built up by forces at the edges of the plate that end up causing a crack in the middle of the plate in response to the force.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    9. Re:No wonder by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      I was rather curious whether such an occurance-- 2 5.x quakes on the same continent within several hours-- is commonplace or not.

      It was a little more worrying when initial reports suggested a third quake in Ny, but apparently it was the same one we had here.

    10. Re:No wonder by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Too far apart, everything I have heard is that they were unrelated.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    11. Re:No wonder by blair1q · · Score: 1

      This was not a slip fault like CA or a subduction fault like Japan.

      Yet.

    12. Re:No wonder by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      Apparently there was a 2.9 sometime later at the same epicenter. I don't think one that small can be detected other than with instruments.

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    13. Re:No wonder by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      Yet? Any research to back that up? I've honestly never seen any study of faults 'changing' type. The time scales involved so vast that I don't know that they ever 'change', but perhaps.

      Still, that is so far in the future as to be irrelevant.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    14. Re:No wonder by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Don't think the grandparent is referring to a completely unrelated quake zone. USGS did report four aftershocks ranging from 2.2 to 4.2. Quote from them below:

      "For the size earthquake that occurred, I think the number of aftershocks so far has been remarkably low," said Amy Vaughan, a geophysicist with the USGS Earthquake Information Center in Colorado. "I don't know if that's an indication of things to come or not. ... There's likely there will be some more, but I don't know for how long and how large."

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  11. Pictures of Devestation by pctainto · · Score: 5, Funny
    --
    I think my principles are reachin' an all time low
    1. Re:Pictures of Devestation by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Props to you sir. I wish I had some mod points.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    2. Re:Pictures of Devestation by kryliss · · Score: 1

      20% of all structures brought down!!

      --
      --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.
    3. Re:Pictures of Devestation by Casca1 · · Score: 0

      Oh My GAWD!
      Senators and Congressional reps will be filling lawsuits, and taking leave because of the injuries incurred during and after.
      Soon, we will have broadcasts of devastated senators, beseeching aid from the general population for clean up from this incredible and unprecedented natural disaster!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      Send money now, they will say...

    4. Re:Pictures of Devestation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is TERRIBLE! Hopefully Obama will send some money to help our the situation!

    5. Re:Pictures of Devestation by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You should see what it did to Detroit.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:Pictures of Devestation by anarkavre · · Score: 1

      rofl

      --
      "Without curiosity and knowledge, the mind is a vast void. Without the mind, curiosity and knowledge are nonexistent."
    7. Re:Pictures of Devestation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a native Californian, I would yawn and go back to sleep.

    8. Re:Pictures of Devestation by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      nah, Detroit's fine, all the chairs burned years ago...

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    9. Re:Pictures of Devestation by AngryDeuce · · Score: 2

      8-23-11

      NEVER FORGET

    10. Re:Pictures of Devestation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      West coast devastated as millions on the East are left alive.

    11. Re:Pictures of Devestation by azgard · · Score: 1

      Heh, I will never forget it, and I live in Czech Republic. I was about to be called by my American coworkers to attend a meeting, but instead I got an IM with "meeting canceled - there was an earthquake". It was weird, but we did have the meeting in the end.

    12. Re:Pictures of Devestation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too soon.

    13. Re:Pictures of Devestation by E.I.A · · Score: 0

      Typical /. snobbery; this same link was posted way above, and got 3, and yet way below it gets 5. I bet god herself couldn't win a half-point here with neutral karma.

      --
      Laws are like sausages. It's better not to see them being made. - Otto von Bismarck
    14. Re:Pictures of Devestation by E.I.A · · Score: 0

      "never forget" Great idea, and while you at never forgetting - since you made the insinuation - see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw&feature=player_embedded Not so easy to make fun of.

      --
      Laws are like sausages. It's better not to see them being made. - Otto von Bismarck
    15. Re:Pictures of Devestation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hilarious. Although this post is in reference to an earthquake on July 16 2010:

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/16/dc-earthquake-2010-magnit_n_648677.html

    16. Re:Pictures of Devestation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What did it do?

    17. Re:Pictures of Devestation by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Odd, I recall seeing the same damage back there after the '67 riots. :)

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  12. Felt in Vermont by n1ywb · · Score: 1

    Felt it here in Vermont, got our building swaying.

    --
    -73, de n1ywb
    www.n1ywb.com
    1. Re:Felt in Vermont by sremick · · Score: 1

      Hello to another Vermonter, felt it here too. Not all felt it though.

    2. Re:Felt in Vermont by mysqlrocks · · Score: 1

      Yup—felt it here in Burlington, Vermont as well. We're on the third floor of an old mill building, so really felt the swaying back-and-forth.

    3. Re:Felt in Vermont by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also Burlington, didn't feel a thing...

  13. Because of the geology by wiredog · · Score: 5, Informative

    Earthquakes in the eastern US are felt over a much wider area than those in the western US. It's one big plate, so an earthquake anywhere is felt all across it. Like hitting a pipe with a hammer.

    In the west the plates are broken up by many faults, which absorb the energy release.

    1. Re:Because of the geology by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      There was an earthquake in Colorado last night:

      link

    2. Re:Because of the geology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it was an unrelated coincident but, just a bit after the time of this thing, I was having the strangest feeling of side-to-side motion. It was so slight, I wasn't even sure I was really feeling it or imagining it. I'm in Cincinnati, Ohio. Haven't felt it since.
       
      Ha! Captcha is "earthy"

    3. Re:Because of the geology by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Like hitting a pipe with a hammer.

      I think what you meant to say was that it was like pushing on the frame of the car as opposed to pushing on an open door. You're on slashdot, a little earthquake is no excuse to go using a metaphor that doesn't involve cars.

    4. Re:Because of the geology by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      It could be like how hitting the exhaust pipe can be felt while sitting on the bonnet.

    5. Re:Because of the geology by steelfood · · Score: 1

      The rock is also solid as hell. It's great for holding up tall buildings, but then the buildings have to be designed to absorb any and all of the shock as well.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    6. Re:Because of the geology by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yes, but a 5.6 earthquake at midnight centered in Trinidad, Colorado doesn't really effect a lot of people.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Because of the geology by C0R1D4N · · Score: 1

      I was actually in a parked car when it happened and it was swaying like someone was on the outside rocking it gently on its suspension.

    8. Re:Because of the geology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Seismologist here.

      It's not the number of faults/plates that help the west coast per se, it all comes down to the rocks (or lack there of) your building is on. First, a little geology lesson. Starting from the Rockies to the west, everything is folded and faulted which has brought the solid bedrock close to if not on the surface. Deep sediment packages can only accumulate between the mountains (in other words, in the valleys). Constant folding and faulting keeps these valleys small and the sediment packages remain shallow (at most a couple miles deep).

      East of the Rockies, the sediment depth is very, very large. Sediment washes off of the Rocky Mountains and the Appalachians, building up and forcing the bedrock downward. This in turn accommodates more space for more sediment, which becomes a positive feedback loop (To a point, but I'm leaving the details out for simplicity). This causes very, very deep packages of sediment that extend over huge areas to the west and east of the Appalachian Mountains.

      Why does the sediment size and depth matter? As I explain to my students, think of the sediment as your favorite flavor of jello, and the bedrock-y mountains as the more solid plastic bowls or cups that surround the jello. In this model, an earthquake is when you smack that bowl as hard as you can. The bedrock (bowl) stops moving really quickly, but the jello inside keeps going and going. The deeper it jello is, the longer it takes for the jello to stop moving. Furthermore, the west coast is like a bunch of little jello cups with all the bedrock mountains dividing the shallow, small jello cups (i.e., the small valleys with shallow sediment depth). Hit one cup, and although the energy is spread out to different cups, it dissipates quickly and the shallow jello stops wiggling rapidly. The Midwest and the East Coast are like a giant bowl of jello that once hit, takes a very long time to stop shaking and the energy of the quake keeps going and going.

      tl;dr version: It's not the number of faults in the plate, it's the depth and area of sediments that transmit earthquake surface energy better in the east vs. the dissipating effect of mountains in the west.

    9. Re:Because of the geology by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      And here I was all convinced that the earth's crust was a series of pipes.

    10. Re:Because of the geology by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      AC, sorry I lost you after you stated to use Jello for the example. Next time, please use Pudding Pops and explain with a Bill Cosby voice..

    11. Re:Because of the geology by V.+P.+Winterbuttocks · · Score: 1

      It's like shaking a plate full of hot grits. Grits that slide off the plate fall onto Natalie Portman, who's like the ocean.

      --
      I'm the real Vorokrytin P. Winterbuttocks.
    12. Re:Because of the geology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like hitting a pipe with a hammer.

      I think what you meant to say was that it was like pushing on the frame of the car as opposed to pushing on an open door. You're on slashdot, a little earthquake is no excuse to go using a metaphor that doesn't involve cars.

      simile

  14. Pittsburgh, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    6th floor of a hospital here in Pittsburgh- my chair rocked and almost fell over.

  15. M5.9 now, looks like it was revised. by Aqualung812 · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    1. Re:M5.9 now, looks like it was revised. by adonoman · · Score: 5, Funny

      I like that it's listed at a depth of 1km, with an uncertainty of +/- 7.4 km... I really hate those sky-quakes.

    2. Re:M5.9 now, looks like it was revised. by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 1

      Almost spit up diet coke to that one. Props!

      --
      I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    3. Re:M5.9 now, looks like it was revised. by vlm · · Score: 1

      I like that it's listed at a depth of 1km, with an uncertainty of +/- 7.4 km... I really hate those sky-quakes.

      That's shallow enough to have been "something" at one of the local military bases.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    4. Re:M5.9 now, looks like it was revised. by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      are you almost alright?

    5. Re:M5.9 now, looks like it was revised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, those totally exist!

    6. Re:M5.9 now, looks like it was revised. by padraic2 · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, the event page seems to have been revised but sits at a different URL, here.

    7. Re:M5.9 now, looks like it was revised. by anarkavre · · Score: 1

      lol

      --
      "Without curiosity and knowledge, the mind is a vast void. Without the mind, curiosity and knowledge are nonexistent."
    8. Re:M5.9 now, looks like it was revised. by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I like that it's listed at a depth of 1km, with an uncertainty of +/- 7.4 km... I really hate those sky-quakes.

      You know, I could swear there used to be a mountain here.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    9. Re:M5.9 now, looks like it was revised. by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't ever hear about it though...but yeah, it could be...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    10. Re:M5.9 now, looks like it was revised. by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      At least it's in metric. I guess that they know the whole world will be looking at that page, except the Americans who are scared when numbers interfere with their news.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    11. Re:M5.9 now, looks like it was revised. by CrazyDuke · · Score: 1

      I am not aware of any government facilities nearby. But, there are some old gold and pyrite mines SSW of Mineral, hence the name.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    12. Re:M5.9 now, looks like it was revised. by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      I think I know what happened:

      There was a moving train, a group of dangerous well-armed international terrorists and a former Navy Seal. It would actually make a great movie. Oh wait ..... Under Siege 2 a reality?

    13. Re:M5.9 now, looks like it was revised. by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      That's shallow enough to have been "something" at one of the local military bases.

      Like what? Even the atomic testing they did years ago didn't generate this kind of energy.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  16. Raleigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Definitely felt in in Raleigh - of course, I assumed my neighbor's washer was just unbalanced and shaking the adjoining wall.

  17. Being in Richmond by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    The whole house shook for a good minute or more. Now I don't have to wonder what an earthquake feels like.

    Where I am now, the cell and land lines phones are out, but I still have cable Internet access - thank you Comcast (oh the irony)

    BTW Mineral is not Northern VA

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:Being in Richmond by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      Phones are back for me now

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:Being in Richmond by narcc · · Score: 1

      Phones are back for me now

      Okay ... did you need someone to call and console you?

    3. Re:Being in Richmond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, a whole 2 minutes. Life must have been unbearable.

    4. Re:Being in Richmond by Relayman · · Score: 1

      I prefer to call the lines congested rather than out. I doubt any repairs were needed; just get the people to use twitter instead of the phone.

      --
      If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
    5. Re:Being in Richmond by jpstanle · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points, because this quake was definitely NOT in Northern Virginia. Sure it was felt there, it was quite significant even here in Frederick, MD, but the quake was centered in Mineral, VA, just outside of the Richmond, VA metro area, which is very distinctly NOT Northern Virginia.

    6. Re:Being in Richmond by thesh0ck · · Score: 0

      sure is... its 57miles northwest of richmond. In the top portion of the state. Look at the map.

    7. Re:Being in Richmond by geekoid · · Score: 1

      How can 14 miles N. of the 64 NOT be Northern Virginia?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:Being in Richmond by trebach · · Score: 1

      Near the Coliseum, the office shook for 2 minutes. The cell phones didn't work for close to 30 minutes, but internet never went down (thank you redundant T1's) And again, Mineral is not in Northern Virginia.

    9. Re:Being in Richmond by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      Because northern Virginia means "the DC suburbs."

    10. Re:Being in Richmond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Northern VA" is not technically defined by the map boundaries but more from economic, cultural, and urban type boundaries, It is actually North Eastern VA. It currently stops at Spotsylvania county to the south and Faquier or Culpeper depending on who you ask to the West.

      Another way to look at it. If a majority of your counties working population travels north towards DC or east towards DC to work, you live in an area considered to be "Northern VA". Northern VA has been expanding west and south over the years as people move away to cheaper outlying areas but still travel towards DC to work.

  18. Felt it in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Felt it in downtown Toronto as well. Also, they upgraded it to a 5.9.

    1. Re:Felt it in Canada by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      Yep, we felt it too (Mississauga, just west of Toronto). I thought it was a stress related dizzy spell for a second!

    2. Re:Felt it in Canada by kenboldt · · Score: 1

      Felt it in Barrie too.

    3. Re:Felt it in Canada by TomTraynor · · Score: 1

      Felt it in Ottawa too.

      --
      Panic now, beat the rush!
    4. Re:Felt it in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About half my workplace in Ottawa noticed it. I'm not in a tall building either... I think it was the racks of electronics that tend to rattle.

    5. Re:Felt it in Canada by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I'd sell when it reaches 6.0

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  19. Re:NO ONE CARES by Paladin114 · · Score: 1

    It's a pretty big deal for a place as tectonically stable (normally) as the mid-Atlantic region. Shook us pretty well here in Annapolis. Also caused evacs from the Capitol; even God wants them to stop spending so much money.

  20. Felt in Columbus, OH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Felt in Columbus, OH

  21. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Congrats to the East Coast for feeling an earthquake. With love from the West Coast.

    1. Re:wow by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was wondering why this is even news. A 5.8 magnitude earthquake is just not that big of a deal. I always laugh when the East Coast based news outlets make a big deal out of such small earthquakes.

      I get letting it be local news, but this is hardly worth talking about on a national level. The discussion that needs to happen is on the East Coast where they think they're impervious to earthquakes, not nationally. The rest of us know better.

    2. Re:wow by DisKurzion · · Score: 1

      This is the first earthquake of any magnitude I (and a good number of other NE dwellers) ever felt.

      I would certainly classify that as news, even if it wasn't a destructive quake.

    3. Re:wow by Migraineman · · Score: 1

      Here on the East Coast, our building codes don't account for earthquakes. Hell, many of our structures pre-date the Louisiana Purchase and the acquisition of most of the southwest from Mexico. Modern construction methods here allow the use of toothpicks and chewing gum as structural components ... because "we don't get earthquakes here."

      When you experience an earthquake east of the Mississippi, the frog says "get out."

    4. Re:wow by demonbug · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I was wondering why this is even news. A 5.8 magnitude earthquake is just not that big of a deal. I always laugh when the East Coast based news outlets make a big deal out of such small earthquakes.

      I get letting it be local news, but this is hardly worth talking about on a national level. The discussion that needs to happen is on the East Coast where they think they're impervious to earthquakes, not nationally. The rest of us know better.

      I'm from California, and live here still; a 5.8 would be all over the news unless it was in the middle of East Bumfuck, San Bernardino County. That, and on the east coast you can generally feel the shaking from a lot farther away. Oh, and there's the fact that this is the largest earthquake ever recorded in that area (though I'm sure there is paleoseismic evidence of larger quakes), coupled with buildings on the east coast not generally being constructed to withstand even moderate quakes (by California standards), there is the potential for significant damage at least in the immediate area of the epicenter.

      So yes, I know that in California we generally take these things in stride (though I guarantee you would be talking about a 5.8 if it hit near you), but just quit with the bullshit.

    5. Re:wow by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      Yeah you guys are so bad ass.

      But then again, I have seen people from California cry during thunderstorms.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    6. Re:wow by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Part of it is that we rarely ever have quakes strong enough to feel here (the last I remember was 7 or 8 years ago, possibly longer, and I remember only three total) and part of it is we're aware of how old the structures here are, that much of Boston is built on top of landfill on top of wetlands on top of bedrock, so with old brick-and-mortar buildings on wooden stilts in wetlands on top of bedrock and almost 100% of structures built prior to 1976 not taking seismic stresses into account, plus with the region being long overdue for a major quake, Boston is a disaster waiting to happen.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    7. Re:wow by trout007 · · Score: 1

      Check ASCE 7. When you design a structure you check many load cases. On the east coast the winds in the south and snow loads in the north have a larger effect than seismic loads. In the few areas on the east coast that have significant earthquakes include those load cases in the building code.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    8. Re:wow by rgviza · · Score: 1

      The last earthquake of this magnitude on the east coast was 1897 (also in mineral VA). our building codes here aren't set up with earthquakes in mind.

      You can sneeze on some of these buildings and they'll collapse. A lot of them (at least in Maryland, in the older cities such as Annapolis and Baltimore) were built as early as the 1700s and the mortar is severely degraded. I'm expecting my house to be out of level when I get home as it's built in sandy soil that's probably subject to liquefaction and I'm pretty sure the foundation isn't more than 8' deep. I'd be surprised if it was 4'.

      I'd honestly be surprised if my rental property (Baltimore brick house built in 1830) is still standing.

      Laugh it up, but anything over mag 5 is pretty serious business here... We're having water main breaks, gas leaks and all sorts of problems.

      Hopefully the building codes get revised.

      --
      Don't kid yourself. It's the size of the regexp AND how you use it that counts.
    9. Re:wow by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      Yeah you guys are so bad ass.

      But then again, I have seen people from California cry during thunderstorms.

      Pretty much this. I never dreamed people could be so scared of a good thunderstorm until I lived in CA for a few years. Thunderstorms are majestic, you can smell them, feel them on your skin - but I don't know of any that knock over buildings. I don't mind earthquakes myself, but objectively they are scarier than a good peal of thunder.

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    10. Re:wow by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we were feeling kinda left out. Thanks. You can keep your wildfires though.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    11. Re:wow by darrylo · · Score: 1

      It's news because:

      1. It happened in an area that rarely gets earthquakes. I think the last big one in the area (6.5? in NC? or GA?) was back in the mid-1880s.

      2. The building codes out there generally don't have earthquake requirements. They're allowed to (or used to, at least) build out of stone and brick. Bad things happen when stone and brick houses collapse on you. Earthquakes that would only annoy people in CA could cause serious damage and death on the East Coast.

    12. Re:wow by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Luckily, there have been reports of only minor damage. Heard about bricks falling off the sides of some buildings, but no one was injured.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    13. Re:wow by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      >> but I don't know of any that knock over buildings.

      Yeah, well just wait until a thunderstorm gets pissed off and turns into a tornado, which we get here in the East as well.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    14. Re:wow by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      a relative who once lived in LA for awhile said something similar, that a 5.9 would have been noticeable even in an area where earthquakes are more common.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    15. Re:wow by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      >> but I don't know of any that knock over buildings.

      Yeah, well just wait until a thunderstorm gets pissed off and turns into a tornado, which we get here in the East as well.

      I knew, I knew I should inb4 this comment. Tornados are not thunderstorms. Hurricanes are not thunderstorms.

      Good grief.

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    16. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait until southern CA gets a tornado, some humidity or some snow and everyone on the east coast wonders what the big deal is about.

  22. News for nerds? by deimios666 · · Score: 0

    Stuff that matters? At least add something like: the power of the earthquake was 1000 times weaker than the one hitting Fukushima.

    --
    I think, therefore you are.
    1. Re:News for nerds? by wsxyz · · Score: 1

      And the resulting tsunami was 1000x smaller too.

  23. Reporting from Florida... by itchythebear · · Score: 0, Troll

    No tremors here, I just wanted to be cool and report something too...

    --
    If what I just said sounded like a troll, it was probably just a failed attempt at humor.
    1. Re:Reporting from Florida... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing in Kansas City either.

    2. Re:Reporting from Florida... by GuyRiley · · Score: 0

      Thank goodness for Slashdot's comment moderation system, now I don't have to read the thousands of "felt it" me-too posts that are rapidly incoming.

    3. Re:Reporting from Florida... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should start pre-tweeting the pending hurricane.

    4. Re:Reporting from Florida... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hope you and your loved ones are ok.

    5. Re:Reporting from Florida... by babywhiz · · Score: 1

      Yea, just wait a couple days. You will have plenty to report. -Love Midwest.

    6. Re:Reporting from Florida... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to worry. Irene is on her way! :-)

    7. Re:Reporting from Florida... by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      You can say that again. Oh, you meant no -earthquakes-. Yeah, there probably weren't any of those either.

    8. Re:Reporting from Florida... by itchythebear · · Score: 1

      Nah, I'll just do what every other floridian does when there is a hurricane.

      • 10 Oh wow, there is a hurricane out in the Atlantic? Meh, it'll just skirt the east coast, nothing to worry about.
      • 20 Oh, now it definitely is going to hit us? Well at least it'll be a nice change of pace, I'm getting tired of the sun beating down on me and 90% humidity.
      • 30 Oh boy, the hurricane is almost here, I guess I'll get the candles and board games out, just in case we lose power. This we'll be a fun little stay-in night.
      • 40 OH MY GOD THE CARNAGE!! IT'S HATCHING TORNADOS EVERYWHERE!! THERE ARE A BUNCH OF NEWS ANCHORS AND CAMERA CREWS ALL BLOWING AROUND THE EYE OF THE HURRICANE!!! WHAT'S WITH ALL THE ICE CHUNKS FALLING FROM THE SKY, WE'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO HAVE THAT DOWN HERE!!!!
      • 50 Oh neat, the suns out, lets go to the beach!
      • GOTO 10
      --
      If what I just said sounded like a troll, it was probably just a failed attempt at humor.
    9. Re:Reporting from Florida... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Yea, just wait a couple days. You will have plenty to report. -Love Midwest.

      so i herd u lik tornados :p

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    10. Re:Reporting from Florida... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      None in Europe either...

    11. Re:Reporting from Florida... by flintmecha · · Score: 2

      Hurricane Irene says 'hi'.

    12. Re:Reporting from Florida... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Appears that NOAA's latest revision has it pushed out to sea a bit more than yesterday. GP may get a reprieve.

      http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/refresh/graphics_at4+shtml/143914.shtml?50wind120?large#contents

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  24. Felt it in Windsor, Ontario! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More info: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/at00lqe6x3.php

    1. Re:Felt it in Windsor, Ontario! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Interesting that Colorado got a M5.3 (which is rare). OMG. The End Is Near!

      USGS link

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Felt it in Windsor, Ontario! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the rest of the country is getting ready to fall into the ocean leaving California.

  25. Pennsylvania by Drethon · · Score: 1

    Got reports from a friend that works at Penn State that his building was shaking before the news reports started popping up.

    1. Re:Pennsylvania by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Generally the earthquake precedes the news reports about the earthquake.

    2. Re:Pennsylvania by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the tip. Slashdotters offering awesome advise since 1997.

    3. Re:Pennsylvania by vlm · · Score: 2

      Generally the earthquake precedes the news reports about the earthquake.

      Not always. TV / phones go at the speed of light, and S and P waves move at the speed of sound in that material, so TV / phones win if you're far enough away. The japanese blow huge amounts of money on early warning systems that do work, assuming you're not directly over the epicenter. There was a recent /. post on that very topic...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    4. Re:Pennsylvania by dcollins · · Score: 1

      * advice (n)

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    5. Re:Pennsylvania by black+soap · · Score: 1

      The obligatory XKCD has already been linked.

    6. Re:Pennsylvania by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      Knowing Slashdot, this information was expressed in the form of an obligatory XKCD (#723). :)

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    7. Re:Pennsylvania by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I witnessed this first hand with the quake today, it was pretty cool. We (in our office in State College, Pennsylvania) were on a conference call with someone in the DC area when he interrupted and said hold on, the building is shaking here... we just took a power hit... ok apparently we're evacuating, and hung up. About 30 seconds later while we were trying to figure out what was going on, we felt the quake.

    8. Re:Pennsylvania by wdsci · · Score: 1

      I'm at Penn State, and what I've gathered from hearing people talk about it is that those on the upper floors of buildings felt it, but people walking around outside generally didn't. It seems like that might be the case throughout much of northern PA and further north.

    9. Re:Pennsylvania by smellotron · · Score: 1

      Knowing Slashdot, this information was expressed in the form of an obligatory XKCD (#723). :)

      I would have complained to you about failing to hyperlink the referenced document, but then I realized that I have the XKCD URL format memorized. Thanks!

  26. Felt in Ohio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife called from her work to say that she felt her desk moving back and forth, and she wondered whether she had felt an earthquake.

    1. Re:Felt in Ohio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was just me plowing her fat ass

  27. Farmville near by! by SirDrinksAlot · · Score: 1

    How's Facebook's stock handling this? The quake was just north north east of FarmVille. Productivity everywhere just increased.

  28. wussies. by Rinikusu · · Score: 0

    Pffffttttt.. 5.8? that's not even worth crawling out of bed for. /so-cal

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    1. Re:wussies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No but you guys flip out over a little snow.

    2. Re:wussies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how all of the quake experts from the west keep saying this. We get it.

      You're a hardened veteran disillusioned with all mother nature has to throw at you. You once spit in the face a typhoon and swam through a tsunami... You are, the world's most ignorant Californian. Congrat - u - fucking- lations.

    3. Re:wussies. by b0bby · · Score: 1

      Now it's 5.9 - still probably nothing to you guys, but pretty exciting for us. Just imagine if you guys got 2 inches of snow, though!

    4. Re:wussies. by hedwards · · Score: 1

      East Coasters are just not as hardy as folks out west. Where we still kill bears with our own hands and posse up to get dangerous outlaws packing 6 guns.

    5. Re:wussies. by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      To be fair, when Virginia gets 2 inches of snow they have to shut down the entire state.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    6. Re:wussies. by blair1q · · Score: 1

      People in so-cal tie their computer racks to the wall with Earthquake Straps.

      People on the east coast are about to find out why they're called that.

    7. Re:wussies. by PPH · · Score: 1

      Just imagine if you guys got 2 inches of snow, though!

      Meh. That's all the California/East Coast wussies I hear crying. Out here, we have mountains. Real mountains, with real snowfall.

      I skied in that.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    8. Re:wussies. by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Indeed. When I was in Japan, I was surprised that everyone carried umbrellas with them all day if there was a cloud in the sky, they had little umbrella wrapping machines outside of buildings to make sure as little moisture as possible got inside. People were very concerned they might get wet.

      A mild earthquake on the other hand, people continued getting onto elevators, didn't stop to look around to make sure nothing was falling over onto them.

    9. Re:wussies. by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, since the Sierra Nevada mountain range isn't real or anything...

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    10. Re:wussies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very true, but then again your bed isn't likely in a brick building.

    11. Re:wussies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Other than Northridge, LA hasn't had a quake larger than 5.9 since 1971.

    12. Re:wussies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah.. wake me up when you get over an 8.0. /chile

    13. Re:wussies. by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      So does DC/VA/MD...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    14. Re:wussies. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You skied in snow? I always skied on top of snow.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    15. Re:wussies. by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Amazingly, none of our computer racks fell over. But, you have a good point.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    16. Re:wussies. by C0R1D4N · · Score: 1

      Only in DC, Eastern Shore and Norfolk. There's a big chunk of Virginia that sees snow quite often.

    17. Re:wussies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually a 5.8 in California would probably get some news coverage. They only happen in populated areas of California a few times a decade.

      Although it was funny last year when the East Coast made a big deal out of a 3.6 earthquake. A 5.8 is 2000 times stronger and 150 times shakier than a 3.6 according to this calculator.

      We don't even need an inch of snow to get excited in California though. If there's so much as flakes of snow falling for five minutes, even if it melts when it hits the ground, that's already a pretty unusual event (outside of the mountains).

    18. Re:wussies. by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      More like 6 inches. 2 inches falling at evening commute will get an early closure though to stagger people going home (many people just stay anyways after a closure of that type).

    19. Re:wussies. by electron+sponge · · Score: 1

      Pffffttttt.. 5.8? that's not even worth crawling out of bed for. /so-cal

      Yeah, yeah. It's news out there too, and don't deny it. The difference is that when the East Coast gets an earthquake, the whole East Coast feels it due to us all sitting on the same huge plate. Despite your Los Angeles conceit, the center of the American civilization is in the corridor from Virginia to New York to Massachusetts, which comprises a large plurality of our population. These are old cities comparatively, with many buildings built well before earthquakes were understood, let alone prepared for. A 5.anything quake is an alarming occurrence.

      I won't minimize the importance of earthquake preparation, especially on our west coast. But, just think, our national Capitol was built before seismology was a science. They had to evacuate because they didn't know how the building would react. I've read accounts that there were some cracks in the plaster. What happens if this was a 6.x event? The old buildings we look to as our connection to history would be in serious jeopardy. There is evidence of 7.x earthquakes east of the Mississippi (see also: New Madrid). Imagine our Capitol tumbling to the ground and the Washington Monument laying on its side in the Mall. Even Fallout 3 wasn't so dystopian.

      PS Bro, next time LA gets a decent quake don't post.

    20. Re:wussies. by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      As a VA resident who grew up and learned to drive in Michigan, I have to shed a tear every time I see a bit of snow here, and realize what a bunch of sissies live here.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  29. What to (and not to) do during an earthquake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What to Do During an Earthquake
    What to Do After an Earthquake
    Get cover, stay there, and don't go outside.

    1. Re:What to (and not to) do during an earthquake by grub · · Score: 2


      Thanks!

      I've bookmarked your /. comment so I will able to access it immediately if an earthquake ever hits around here.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:What to (and not to) do during an earthquake by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      For a 5.8, no need to do anything special.

      I once slept through a quake that moved my bed across the room when I lived in Alaska.

    3. Re:What to (and not to) do during an earthquake by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      What to Do During an Earthquake
      What to Do After an Earthquake
      Get cover, stay there, and don't go outside.

      Finally, science validates my lifestyle!

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
  30. Fracking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Was someone doing some fracking that we don't know about?
    g=

    1. Re:Fracking? by ProzacPatient · · Score: 1

      Unless you're referring to the original series, otherwise correction: frakking.

    2. Re:Fracking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is absolutely NO scientific evidence that hydraulic fracking has ever caused an earthquake. Please educate yourself on the process of hydraulic fracking of wells at: http://www.chk.com/Environment/Drilling-and-Production/Pages/Completion.aspx ... the amount of energy required to cause even a very small earth quake is incredibly high.... http://oilprice.com/Energy/Natural-Gas/Natural-Gas-Does-Hydraulic-Fracturing-Really-Cause-Earthquakes.html

    3. Re:Fracking? by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      Correction-of-your-correction: fracking.

  31. Amazing... by ImYY4U · · Score: 0

    I didn't think there were any fault line anywhere near Washington DC...so how could this Earthquake happen? Hmm...kind of coincidental how on Monday night there was a 5.3 magnitude earthquake that struck in southeast Colorado...

    Also, why on Earth would they evacuate the Pentagon AFTER the earthquake? Does that make any sense at all?

    --
    "Know but never fear the consequences of your actions."
    1. Re:Amazing... by Sinning · · Score: 1

      Also, why on Earth would they evacuate the Pentagon AFTER the earthquake? Does that make any sense at all?

      Well, this is the east coast. No one knew what the hell was going on until it was over.

    2. Re:Amazing... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      There is a fault line, you are wrong.
      That is just a coincidence.
      The pentagon is full of old fogies most of who don't know their ass from a hole in the ground, so this is what they do when they get a tiny little shake.

    3. Re:Amazing... by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Depending on how poorly parts of the Pentagon were designed, parts of it could collapse, rendering it unsafe for human occupancy. As we said, Sir, it's just a precaution. Nothing to worry about.

    4. Re:Amazing... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Also, why on Earth would they evacuate the Pentagon AFTER the earthquake? Does that make any sense at all?

      I'd sort of hope that the Pentagon would be built to better standards than that; but I can think of one reason you might evacuate after a quake: If the shaking cracked/sheared any gas lines, you could theoretically end up with a delightsome fuel-air situation in part of the building. In that case, you'd want the herd out of the building before the situation deteriorates.

      With stronger quakes, or shoddier buildings, it isn't unheard of for buildings that don't collapse immediately to do so during the aftershocks, in which case you would prefer to be outside as well.(Again, though, serious risk of collapse in the face of a 5.8 should be a breach of any decent building code, much less the standards that you'd want your giant military headquarters/symbolic structure built to...)

    5. Re:Amazing... by kimvette · · Score: 1

      (Again, though, serious risk of collapse in the face of a 5.8 should be a breach of any decent building code, much less the standards that you'd want your giant military headquarters/symbolic structure built to...)

      Questions:

      1. What year were seismic ratings incorporated into national and local building codes?
      2. What year (er, range of years) was the Pentagon built?

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    6. Re:Amazing... by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      If there's a fault line, it isn't documented.
      If you mean seismic zones, yes... but no fault lines.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    7. Re:Amazing... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of the Appalachian mountains? They were created by the upthrusting of two plates colliding...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    8. Re:Amazing... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      As opposed to evacuating before the earthquake?

      The evacuate to check the building. If you are in a building that didn't evacuate, you are wither in a new building with good earthquake minimization technology, or your building is being run by ass hats.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:Amazing... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Mountain Run Fault, Brookneal Fault, Shores Fault, Lakeside Fault, Spotsylvania Fault, Hylas Fault
      Of course they are part of the Eastern Piedmont fault.

      but please, go on...

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:Amazing... by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      evacuating the building in case of an aftershock?

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    11. Re:Amazing... by smellotron · · Score: 1

      1. What year were seismic ratings incorporated into national and local building codes?

      6000 years ago, when God created building codes and civil engineers.

      2. What year (er, range of years) was the Pentagon built?

      Rebuilt from the ground up in the latter half of September 2001 by Paul Revere himself. We will never forget.

    12. Re:Amazing... by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      Also, why on Earth would they evacuate the Pentagon AFTER the earthquake? Does that make any sense at all?

      Kind of hard to evacuate it before the earthquake.

  32. Greensboro here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scared the hell out of me. Over here in Greensboro NC, it wasn't bad or anything but "Is there an animal under my seat?! WTF?!" it's the unexplained that freaks you out... an earthquake in the East? No way... Laf.

  33. Suburban Philadelphia by padraic2 · · Score: 1

    On the top floor of a three story building, felt a pretty good wobble.

  34. Ok? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess being from California makes you not understand why a 5.8 earthquake would make the front page of slashdot...

    So you don't get earthquakes on the east coast?

    1. Re:Ok? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Not that many. So yes, it is news.

    2. Re:Ok? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. I lived on the east coast for 25 years and this was the first time I've ever felt an earthquake.

    3. Re:Ok? by jmauro · · Score: 1

      The other thing is there are no mountians to dampen the quake so people feel it from St Louis to Miami to Maine. So more people get wind it happened sooner.

    4. Re:Ok? by crashumbc · · Score: 1

      No, and because of the geology of the ground (it is much harder on the East Coast) the quake travels MUCH further...

    5. Re:Ok? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Nope. I lived on the east coast for 25 years and this was the first time I've ever felt an earthquake.

      Not even during sex?

      Ah, I forgot where I was posting for a second. Mea Culpa.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    6. Re:Ok? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did she slip on the Crisco and fall into the tub?

  35. Raleigh - RDU Airport by Demoknight · · Score: 1

    Also felt it here in Raleigh @RDU - 2nd floor - Roughly 5-6 seconds a couple of small bursts?

    1. Re:Raleigh - RDU Airport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      felt small continuous bursts for 15-20 seconds here in Chapel Hill, NC

  36. Felt the quake here in Cincinnati by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very light but definitely felt the tremor.

  37. Up in MI as well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Felt it in Grand Rapids, MI... only vibrated for a few seconds...

  38. twitter confirmed it by alen · · Score: 1

    i called our director of IT who was a mile away in another building and he said i was crazy. so i hit up twitter and everyone is saying how NYC just had an earthquake. didn't even bother to check the news since twitter is as close to real time as you can get

    1. Re:twitter confirmed it by scubamage · · Score: 1

      Yup, got the confirmation from twitter.

    2. Re:twitter confirmed it by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      I checked Google news maybe a minute after I felt it (in NJ) and was impressed to see they had it already. Not sure hos fast these things travel hence how long after it hit in VA.

  39. Hampton Roads Virginia by Sedated2000 · · Score: 1

    My office building is a single story cubicle farm. We felt two waves here of steady shaking. 37 miles away my fiance felt our apartment building swaying as well. No damage here that I'm aware of but some people are going home anyway.

  40. Felt in Atlanta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We felt it in Atlanta. Our 3 story building shook.

    1. Re:Felt in Atlanta by priceslasher · · Score: 1

      I thought I felt something earlier in SC but the washing machine was also spin cycling so I just shrugged it off. Wonder if the quake might have been a butterfly effect from that.

    2. Re:Felt in Atlanta by m85476585 · · Score: 1

      Yep, I felt it too. I'm in a 5 story building on the top floor.

  41. Felt in Charleston, WV by Cullyn321 · · Score: 1

    Felt it here... People were evacuating building, businesses are closing down, and gov workers are going home..... All over the little shake we felt. Oh and as I was writing this just heard they were evacuating our capitol.

  42. Philadelphia here by scubamage · · Score: 1

    They just upgraded it to 5.9. Felt it here on the 39th floor of my company's building. At first I thougth I was having a panic attack or something, then I realized everyone else was trying to figure out what was going on (the building is tall enough to catch wind sometimes, so it isn't abnormal to feel a brief shake). We ran to the window (engineers know better than to hide in doorways!) and verified that the water in the pool on top of the building next door was shimmying, indicating some definite motion was going on. Now I just feel a little queasy. Weird experience.

    1. Re:Philadelphia here by PRMan · · Score: 1

      We ran to the window (engineers know better than to hide in doorways!)

      In California, this advice comes from experience.

      In an earthquake, the emergency rooms are filled with people that have had a few things happen to them:

      1. Massive cuts and loss of blood due to standing too close to a window during an earthquake. The motion can cause shards of glass to go flying like razors.

      2. Injuries from things in the ceiling falling on them. Speakers, light fixtures, sprinkler heads, etc. These things can knock people unconscious and cause major head trauma.

      3. Standing in a doorway WITH A DOOR IN IT. They get lots of people with separated shoulders where the door has pounded their shoulder repeatedly.

      Nobody is worrying that the entire building is coming down. That's really unlikely to happen.

      The solution to all these problems is:

      1. Get in a doorless doorway.

      2. Get under a very sturdy desk or table.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    2. Re:Philadelphia here by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Stand in the middle of the room, away from anything that can fall over. If it's bad, stay in the building. Many people in NZ were killed in the Christchurch earthquake by debris falling on them as they were fleeing the building. If it's *really* bad, run and hope for luck. More people were killed in that Earthquake from collapsing buildings than debris, so being "safe" inside didn't help.

    3. Re:Philadelphia here by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Stay the fuck out of doorways. they are NOT safer, and in most cases MORE dangerous.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Philadelphia here by sjames · · Score: 1

      It's just those damned day traders. It'll be back down to 4.9 by morning.

  43. Re:NO ONE CARES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cracked brick buildings and knocked over bookshelves here in Charlottesville, VA. Cell service is out.

    A 5.8 here =/= 5.8 in Calif or Japan. The geology is different.

  44. Toronto by complex_pi · · Score: 1

    Felt in Toronto too.

    1. Re:Toronto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First Canadian Place swaying sure was worrying.

    2. Re:Toronto by phyr · · Score: 1

      The 7th floor kept moving here in Toronto for quite a long time

    3. Re:Toronto by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      Really? I'm in an office tower downtown and didn't feel a thing. Maybe my building is better. ;)

  45. Disappointed by paleo2002 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I live in northern NJ and didn't even know there was a quake until I saw it on the web. As a geology teacher I'm really disappointed because I've never actually experienced an earthquake directly. Maybe I'll get lucky and there'll be some strong aftershocks. That would rock!

    1. Re:Disappointed by Colven · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'll get lucky and there'll be some strong aftershocks. That would rock!

      I'm 30 miles from the epicenter... and that was my first earthquake. I'd prefer it if there were no further activity, thank you. I thought the friggin building was going to collapse.

      --
      expletives welcomed
    2. Re:Disappointed by scubamage · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming there will be some aftershocks - probably nothing too harsh though. Honestly it was the first time I ever felt a quake... kind of surprised that it was less violent. Kind of felt like standing on a train going over uneven track. I feel a touch queasy.

    3. Re:Disappointed by chispito · · Score: 2

      That would rock!

      Yes, by definition.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    4. Re:Disappointed by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      I'm in Pearl River, NY - right beside northern NJ - and we felt it on the 6th floor of our building. I was sitting at my desk and first thought someone was behind me pushing my chair as a joke.

    5. Re:Disappointed by phatphoton · · Score: 1

      Im on the sixth floor in north Philly and didn't feel a thing. I think I remember a quake happening 15 years ago or so that I felt in Reading, PA, but I was too young to remember exactly what it felt like...I feel pretty left out :(

    6. Re:Disappointed by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      I am trying to build a mental picture of a building frigging, where are the genitalia located?

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    7. Re:Disappointed by CrazyDuke · · Score: 1

      Near the back door, obviously.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    8. Re:Disappointed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feel free to come to California where we have real earthquakes.

  46. Felt it in Richmond, VA (obviously) by Ryantology · · Score: 1

    I've finally lived the dream of getting to watch my furniture dance without the benefit of alcohol. I'm about an hour's drive from the epicenter.

    1. Re:Felt it in Richmond, VA (obviously) by trebach · · Score: 1

      Books didn't even fall off the shelves near the Coliseum.

    2. Re:Felt it in Richmond, VA (obviously) by Ryantology · · Score: 1

      I actually had a picture on the wall fall crooked by as many as five terrifying degrees.

  47. Earthquake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Felt here in Jacksonville, North Carolina. Gentle shaking of desk.

  48. Didn't feel a thing? by DigiTechGuy · · Score: 1

    I walked into the office after coming back from lunch and everyone was all excited about some earthquake or some such nonsense. I was driving and didn't feel a thing. The roads here are terrible though, but sure explains why everyone was loitering around outside buildings down the main drag in town.

  49. USGS Link by wbav · · Score: 0

    There was one last night in CO. Why is this news for nerds?

    Here's the link to usgs.

    --

    =================
    Unix is very user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are.
    1. Re:USGS Link by narcc · · Score: 1

      There was one last night in CO. Why is this news for nerds?

      Earth quakes on the east coast are pretty rare. Also, no one with internet access lives in Colorado.

    2. Re:USGS Link by anarkavre · · Score: 1

      Earth Quake -> Geology -> Science -> Nerds

      --
      "Without curiosity and knowledge, the mind is a vast void. Without the mind, curiosity and knowledge are nonexistent."
    3. Re:USGS Link by wbav · · Score: 1

      Earth Quake -> Geology -> Science -> Nerds

      My point was, CO didn't make the news list, but the DC one did.

      --

      =================
      Unix is very user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are.
    4. Re:USGS Link by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1

      Because this is the highest earthquake in the state on record, and it spawns a great geological discussion on how earthquakes travel farther in the east due to the solid nature of the ground in comparison to the west coast.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    5. Re:USGS Link by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Earth quakes on the east coast are pretty rare. Also, no one with internet access lives in Colorado.

      Are you implying there are people without internet access there? It was my understanding that, aside from towns on the western banks of the Mississippi River and cities on the Pacific coast, no one lives in the western half of the US aside from cacti, tumbleweed, some wild horses, and a couple of mountain lions.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    6. Re:USGS Link by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Nerds like to learn?
      and knowing about things happening help you correlate things, and correlations help with learning about anomolies...
      it's science.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    7. Re:USGS Link by wbav · · Score: 1

      Which explains why CO wasn't covered how?

      --

      =================
      Unix is very user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are.
    8. Re:USGS Link by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      This vs. this.

    9. Re:USGS Link by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      Which, of course, would have been more helpful if they hadn't somehow reset the VA earthquake's stats. But give it some time and I suppose it will fill back in. And I really meant to paste the links to the distance vs. intensity plots, not just the city maps, but I hit Submit instead of Continue Editing.

    10. Re:USGS Link by Relayman · · Score: 1

      Sorry, we didn't feel the CO one. You need to make yours more powerful. 7.0 would be good.

      --
      If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
    11. Re:USGS Link by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Because it wasn't felt by many people. God, I had forgotten how whiny people in Colorado are for attention.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:USGS Link by narcc · · Score: 1

      Are you implying there are people without internet access there? It was my understanding that, aside from towns on the western banks of the Mississippi River and cities on the Pacific coast, no one lives in the western half of the US aside from cacti, tumbleweed, some wild horses, and a couple of mountain lions.

      While this is likely true, I was trying to account for any errant travelers, hopelessly lost in the Rockies, who have not yet been eaten by a mountain lion.

      Also, bigfoot.

    13. Re:USGS Link by wbav · · Score: 1

      Your point? Something has to be experienced by a lot of people to really be considered news for nerds?

      I find your logic full of holes and bad assumptions.

      --

      =================
      Unix is very user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are.
  50. Building Swaying Gently 10th Floor Toronto, Ontari by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Felt it up, here...went outside to bird dog the girls streaming out of the building and lost cell access for a few minutes..

  51. Aftershock theory by tinkerghost · · Score: 1
    In a really brief format:
    • earthquakes are caused by shifting along faultlines.
    • When the faultline freezes, the stresses builds until the stresses get larger than the structural strength of the rocks making up the fault.
    • The sudden release of stress at one point on the faultline translates that energy along the faultline as the sides of the fault shift.
    • The stress shifting along the faultlines can cause either the same location to release again - aftershocks, or other sections of the fault to release - chain earthquakes.
    1. Re:Aftershock theory by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      Except this isn't a slip fault as your example describes. It's a stress fault in the middle of the plate not along the edges that could 'slip'.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    2. Re:Aftershock theory by thesh0ck · · Score: 0

      huh? what? the whole thing slips... this isnt california where its all cracked up and only small sections move.. the entire slab of earth moves, thats why we felt it all along the east coast.

    3. Re:Aftershock theory by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      Nope, the reason it was felt all up and down the coast is because it is one big solid plate. There is a crack in the middle of the plate and I suppose you could say it 'slipped' but it is not a 'slip fault' per the geologic definition like the San Andreas fault is a slip fault.

      It would be more correct to say a large piece of metal is being stressed by pushing or twisting it from the edges and a small stress fracture occurs in the middle of the plate. Because it is one solid plate the vibrations of that fracture run much farther and are stronger than they would be if the same large plate was slipping against another plate at its edge. The reason is because even though the plates are solid, the material between them is generally much looser than solid bedrock and it absorbs the vibrations much quicker. A 5.9 in CA does localized damage but isn't felt very far away because of this specific factor.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    4. Re:Aftershock theory by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      the entire slab of earth moves

      one more thing, the plate itself 'vibrated' but didn't really 'move'. As in it's still basically in the same place on the globe. As opposed to the 'slip fault' in CA where there are measurable movements of the plate laterally along the earths crust. (Or Japan where we can clearly see the plate is in a different position due to the movement of the subduction fault.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  52. Cincinnati, OH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Felt it here as well

  53. Easthampton, MA by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

    Felt it here at work. We're on the third floor of an old brick factory building. Certainly heard a few items upstairs hit the floor. Everyone went outside and proceeded to not have cell service. Text was fine though.

    --

    The Digital Sorceress
    1. Re:Easthampton, MA by black+soap · · Score: 1

      and proceeded to not have cell service

      I like this grammatical construction, and will probably steal it.

    2. Re:Easthampton, MA by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      Natick, MA here.

      Was in a meeting in an interior conference room, 3rd floor. I asked if anyone else felt the room shaking, but I was the only one. Then after meeting we see the news.

      I'm surprised--I've never felt one of these little East Coast quakes before. Although this one is on the large size for the area. Usually it's a 4.something that you can't tell from a large truck rumbling by.

      I was in Southern CA not too far from the epicenter of a 6.3. That was fun. Not large enough to be a catastrophe, but enough to clear your schedule for the afternoon.

  54. Felt it in Columbus, OH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Felt it in Columbus OH as well. Pretty far away

  55. timestamps - out by 3 minutes? by rcpitt · · Score: 1
    Hmmm... first indication I got was a post at 10:55AM (time shows my Pacific time) on Google+ from one Scott Beale

    Note that my workstation is locked into NTP (drift of 5.0ms) but in any case I'd expect that Google's servers are too.

    --
    Been there, done that, paid for the T-shirt
    and didn't get it
  56. Good earthquake stanards? by theshibboleth · · Score: 1

    5.9's a pretty big earthquake for the East Coast, no? I'm surprised there wasn't more damage. Anyone know what magnitude the buildings are built to withstand? (As far as cell/internet/land lines being down, that happens on the West Coast too, but it's just because everyone's trying to use them at the same time.)

    1. Re:Good earthquake stanards? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Some buildings in Boston may have been damaged; probably due to settling of landfill and ancient wooden pilings under the older buildings. There are reports of a building having tilted and has been evacuated pending a building inspection.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    2. Re:Good earthquake stanards? by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      5.9's a pretty big earthquake for the East Coast, no? I'm surprised there wasn't more damage. Anyone know what magnitude the buildings are built to withstand? (As far as cell/internet/land lines being down, that happens on the West Coast too, but it's just because everyone's trying to use them at the same time.)

      They don't build anything here with earthquakes in mind. They build them to withstand hurricanes.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    3. Re:Good earthquake stanards? by kimvette · · Score: 1
      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  57. Time discrepancy by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    The USGS site has it occurring a few minutes earlier - 1:51pm - while here we say 1:58pm. Not sure where the slashdot article gets its time from, or what the discrepancy comes from...

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Time discrepancy by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Slashcode randomly inserts factual errors into submissions. It does this by allowing dumb people to post. This is a known bug in Web 2.0.

    2. Re:Time discrepancy by Unknown+Lamer · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the heads up -- this was a "breaking news run it quickly!" situation and I managed to write down the post time instead of the quake time without noticing.

      --

      HAL 7000, fewer features than the HAL 9000, but just as homicidal!
    3. Re:Time discrepancy by demonbug · · Score: 1

      The USGS site has it occurring a few minutes earlier - 1:51pm - while here we say 1:58pm. Not sure where the slashdot article gets its time from, or what the discrepancy comes from...

      Probably depends on where the observer is. USGS puts in the time at the epicenter (theoretical, back calculated from when it was detected at whatever seismometers were used for the location fix). P-wave travel time from the epicenter to New York, for example, is about 1 minute (theoretical). Most people that far away probably wouldn't have felt the p-wave, but rather the S-wave, which takes significantly longer to travel. I would guess the 1:58 is the arrival time of the S-waves at whatever place was reporting it.

    4. Re:Time discrepancy by Relayman · · Score: 1

      S-wave hit Cincinnati about 1:54:30 (based on when the previous song finished in iTunes).

      --
      If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
  58. Felt in Toronto by Pope · · Score: 1

    18th floor of an office building, a bunch of the people noticed it, and a whole lot didn't. Guess it depends on what you're doing. I blame my not noticing on being a guy and therefore a poor multitasker :D

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  59. Re:NO ONE CARES by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    5.8 isnt tiny, and this one was felt over a rather large area.

  60. Epicenter Mineral, VA by QuantumPion · · Score: 2, Informative

    The epicenter of the earthquake was apparently just a few miles away from North Anna Nuclear Power Plant.

    1. Re:Epicenter Mineral, VA by demonbug · · Score: 1

      The epicenter of the earthquake was apparently just a few miles away from North Anna Nuclear Power Plant.

      Nice. Apparently it was just rated as having a 1/22,000 chance or so of suffering a core breach from seismic activity. I wonder what they were basing it on - a 5.9 is pretty damn big for that area.

    2. Re:Epicenter Mineral, VA by QuantumPion · · Score: 2

      No, you are misinterpreting that statement. The NRC said that there was a 1/22,000 chance of a large enough earthquake occurring that could possibly cause core damage:

      The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's estimate of the risk each year of an earthquake intense enough to cause core damage to the reactor at North Anna was 1 in 22,727, according to an NRC study published in August 2010.[9][10]

      Note core damage does not equal core breech. Furthermore just because a large enough earthquake to possibly cause core damage occurs does not necessitate that core damage does occur.

    3. Re:Epicenter Mineral, VA by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Man. That's got to be a fun time. Sitting at your desk in the freaking nuclear plant when the entire planet starts moving.

      I hope they keep clean pants in a file drawer.

    4. Re:Epicenter Mineral, VA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is nobody seeing the real cause???

      It was Silurians tapping the power plant!

    5. Re:Epicenter Mineral, VA by demonbug · · Score: 1

      No, you are misinterpreting that statement. The NRC said that there was a 1/22,000 chance of a large enough earthquake occurring that could possibly cause core damage:

      The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's estimate of the risk each year of an earthquake intense enough to cause core damage to the reactor at North Anna was 1 in 22,727, according to an NRC study published in August 2010.[9][10]

      Note core damage does not equal core breech. Furthermore just because a large enough earthquake to possibly cause core damage occurs does not necessitate that core damage does occur.

      You're right about damage vs. breach, but that wasn't really my question. I just find it ironic that just after they did the study, apparently the largest ever recorded earthquake in the region strikes. The risk estimate for damage to the core is based on shaking power at various frequency bands (actually, I think specific frequencies, like 1 Hz and 5 Hz and 10 Hz), and I am just wondering how the shaking from this quake compares to their estimates. Unfortunately I don't think that USGS publishes such frequency-specific shaking intensity data (if they even generally collect it).

      Actually, from reading the NRC document, it looks like the damage probability for the North Anna plant was estimated from peak ground acceleration, not from shaking intensity at the various frequencies as some of the others were. From USGS shaking intensity maps it appears that peak ground acceleration at the plant was in the range of 0.04-0.09 g's. According to the NRC quake risk document, the North Anna plant has a 1% chance of failure at 0.16 g's, so shaking from this should have been well under what would be expected to cause damage. I just wonder how this new data point changes their risk calculations.

    6. Re:Epicenter Mineral, VA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's official. God hates nuclear power and is trying to destroy all the plants.

    7. Re:Epicenter Mineral, VA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When North Anna Nuclear Power Station was under construction, a visiting geology prof noted to the utility that there was an fault line square through the middle of the reactor buildings. The utility denied that for years, said it was not a fault. When they finally 'fessed up to the NRC, they were fined a hundred grand or so. It was then agreed that the fault was old and inactive, maybe 10 million years inactive.

      Now, maybe not so inactive.

    8. Re:Epicenter Mineral, VA by jank1887 · · Score: 1

      which shut down as a precaution, is running cooling equipment off of diesel generators, and appears to be undamaged.

    9. Re:Epicenter Mineral, VA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Core damage is things like 1 of more than 1000 uranium fuel rod thingy bending/breaking and touching another. It does NOT indicate meltdown or anything like that, just core damage. Core damage results in extended shutdown and costly repairs - something that you want to avoid.

      For example, core damage could prevent 1 control rod from being re-inserted, but it does not prevent the rest of the control rods from working.. These numbers are also hypothetical. You don't know how much damage there is going to be until after the earthquake.

      It is also possible for reactor to sustain core damage requiring repairs after it has already shut down. In many reactors, shut down could occur prior to most of the shacking and control rods would all be in place.

      Nuclear meltdown can only occur in either loss of coolant accident (ie. no cooling), or powerful enough event to literally destroy the structural integrity of the reactor, causing it to kind of collapse on itself. The latter is basically impossible short of small asteroid impact or the like. The former is what happened at Fukushima and 3 mile island.

      Another event is a power excursion, but those are basically impossible due to negative void coefficients in basically all reactors. That is, this is because of physics of the reactor's geometry, not because of some system. This problem is what contributed to Chernobyl disaster because it had a very large positive void coefficient - as coolant boiled, power would dramatically increase causing more coolant to boil, etc, etc,.

    10. Re:Epicenter Mineral, VA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UNTIL THEY GET FLOODED.

    11. Re:Epicenter Mineral, VA by trebach · · Score: 1

      Inactive? There's a earthquake there, however mild it may be, every 5 or so years.

  61. Pentagon is being evacuated by daboochmeister · · Score: 1

    We just received notice that the Pentagon is being evacuated, as a precaution.

    --
    "Ahh! I see you're in that indeterminate Schrodinger state where - oh, uh ... never mind." Dave Bucci
    1. Re:Pentagon is being evacuated by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      A M5.8 earthquake is enough to render parts of the Pentagon structurally unsound?

    2. Re:Pentagon is being evacuated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe there are ammunition stores inside?

    3. Re:Pentagon is being evacuated by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      Well, usually the Pentagon evacuates around 2:30 PM on a workday anyway.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    4. Re:Pentagon is being evacuated by Stray7Xi · · Score: 1

      Yes, old government buildings are structurally unsound before an earthquake hits.

  62. Nice shake in Philly by kammat · · Score: 1

    Felt the desk moving, thought it was a truck outside again. When it didn't stop after a second we were all looking around puzzled. Hoping everything at home is okay.

  63. man made? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last night there was a 5.3 in Colorado, where the only only earthquakes in the last 100 years were both 5.x size and were later determined to be man made via drilling or explosives. Same thing today. 5.3 in CO and then a 5.8 in VA. VA is not known for natural seismic activity but it is known for being the center of the federal government. Will researchers be able to determine if it was natural or if it was the result of some drilling/construction deep under DC?

  64. Southern NJ by Sefi915 · · Score: 1
    At home, doing laundry from a weekend away with my fiancee, I felt rattling that I initially attributed to my dad toodling around in his wheelchair. Then when stuff started to fall off shelves, I knew something else was going on.

    Not many clouds in the sky - no tornado... only thing left that's not unnatural is earthquake. It was neat, but slightly scary too.

  65. From Florida by Splitterside · · Score: 1

    We didn't feel nothing down here...

  66. Felt it in Cambridge, MA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a gentle rumble for 20 seconds or so.

  67. Colorado Too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently there was also a quake in Colorado...

    http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/08/23/colorado.quake/

  68. iPhone iOS5 users already knew about it by gmuslera · · Score: 1
    1. Re:iPhone iOS5 users already knew about it by alen · · Score: 1

      there was an app i had when i had an iphone that would send a push message every time an earthquake over 5 hit somewhere

  69. Reached downtown Detroit by DriedClexler · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just flew in to Detroit on business, so I didn't feel it, but you can see it pretty clearly impacted the area near downtown. It shook a few houses to the ground, it left immense cracks in the streets, and I can already see looting going on.

    God, some areas look like a third-world country now! I hope the other places handled it better.

    --
    Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    1. Re:Reached downtown Detroit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Been like that for a while in Detroit. I'm sure it want the quake.

    2. Re:Reached downtown Detroit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I flew out a few hours ahead of you. It sounds like the quake fixed the place up a bit.

    3. Re:Reached downtown Detroit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just flew in to Detroit on business, so I didn't feel it, but you can see it pretty clearly impacted the area near downtown. It shook a few houses to the ground, it left immense cracks in the streets, and I can already see looting going on.

      God, some areas look like a third-world country now! I hope the other places handled it better.

      I felt it here on long Island, was noticeable, but not powerful enough to do anything.

    4. Re:Reached downtown Detroit by flibby · · Score: 1

      -1 explaining the joke.

    5. Re:Reached downtown Detroit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure it was an earthquake? Sounds like just another day in Detriot.Oops, I mean Detroit.

    6. Re:Reached downtown Detroit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      moron.

    7. Re:Reached downtown Detroit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long did the quake last? 10 years?

    8. Re:Reached downtown Detroit by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Must be no running water either as the inhabitants are dirty and un-bathed. But at least the federal government's response to the detroit devastation was fast. Already, you can see the long lines at the post offices for the relief checks. 400 lbs. whore-bags are redeeming them for ding-dongs and orange drink at the 7-11, however they are finding they don't cover much needed medicinal supplies such as glass tubes with paper roses in them and copper scrubbing pads.

    9. Re:Reached downtown Detroit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're lying... you can tell, as if you'd go to Detroit for business.

    10. Re:Reached downtown Detroit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly, this is your first flight to Detroit.

    11. Re:Reached downtown Detroit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just flew in to Detroit on business, so I didn't feel it, but you can see it pretty clearly impacted the area near downtown. It shook a few houses to the ground, it left immense cracks in the streets, and I can already see looting going on.

      God, some areas look like a third-world country now! I hope the other places handled it better.

      You're mistaken. That's Detroit on any day.

    12. Re:Reached downtown Detroit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope that GM and Chrysler don't go bankrupt because of it!

    13. Re:Reached downtown Detroit by khallow · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised the FBI hasn't picked him up yet for the admission.

    14. Re:Reached downtown Detroit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't say the business was in Detroit. They do have a very nice airport - hotels, restaurants, shops, art, mass transit. It's basically a small city. Might as well just abandon everything outside...

    15. Re:Reached downtown Detroit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Detroit always looks like that.

  70. Earth hates us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  71. DC Quake -- um, ok, we shook a little. by Is+Any+Nickname+Left · · Score: 1

    Really, I'm near DC and it wasn't that big a deal. People running into the streets were in greater danger of being hit by cars than by having their building fall down. I saw a group of people standing BETWEEN two buildings, both of which had large panes of glass that, if they fell, could ruin someone's day.

    1. Re:DC Quake -- um, ok, we shook a little. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In every disaster movie, some people have to die. Even if it means placing them in really convenient spots to do so.

    2. Re:DC Quake -- um, ok, we shook a little. by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      ... and as everyone knows, DC is a disaster movie waiting to happen.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  72. 2012!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two 5.0+ earthquakes in the Continental US in less than a day! 2012 has begun early!! /sarcasm

    It is interesting though, I wonder how often this kind of thing has happened in the past, two different fault lines tripping the same day with 5.0+ quakes. For those interested below is a link to the USGS's earthquake monitoring website. Gives a nice graphical representation of the seismic activity in the last week. The west coast seems to have continuous minor tremors.

    http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsus/

  73. And now cell service is knocked out... by c0nner · · Score: 1

    ...from everyone calling their friends and trying to update facebook...

  74. Re:NO ONE CARES by blair1q · · Score: 1

    0 damage would be highly improbable

    83% likelihood of $1 million to $1 billion in damage
    22% likelihood it killed someone

    http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/pager/events/us/c0005ild/index.html

  75. Baltimore by Atmchicago · · Score: 1

    I felt it in Baltimore. I could hear the glassware in the lab shaking. At first I thought it was from a nearby construction site.

    --

    You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

  76. Indian Point Nuclear Plant by rossendryv · · Score: 1

    We have an office 2 miles for Indian Point in Peekskill, NY. Our building rattled slightly for about 2 minutes....

  77. central nj here by spartacus_prime · · Score: 1

    Heard kids running around upstairs, then started hearing/feeling shaking. Chandelier started swinging slightly. Probably 30-45 seconds. My first earthquake, but kept calm, surprisingly.

    --
    If you can read this, it means that I bothered to log in.
  78. Felt in TO by LibRT · · Score: 1

    Felt it here in Toronto on the 32nd floor - building started swaying a fair bit. Thought I had too much blood in my alcohol system for a second there...

    1. Re:Felt in TO by DontBlameCanada · · Score: 1

      Felt it in Ottawa, the world stopped swaying for a few seconds and resumed after the quake. I know I have too much alcohol in my system: firewater lunch = Winning!

  79. Re:NO ONE CARES by blair1q · · Score: 1

    God wants them to tax the rich (never God's favorite folks) and spend more money on poor people so they stop blaming God for how fucked up their lives are under the plutocracy.

  80. I wish my Dad were alive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He lived through the Great Depression and was cautious about a lot of things. He carried quake insurance on our house in Virginia--it was very cheap and he knew that quakes can still happen anywhere.

    The first quake I ever felt was on the 5th floor of a building in DC in 2003. It was a gentle nudge and I noted that it felt like somebody dropped a box of copy paper; but there was no sound. I didn't realize it was a quake until I got in the car and turned on the radio. That quake was a 4.5, and remember the scale is logarithmic.

    As others will no doubt point out, quakes in the eastern US are not like Pacific quakes. There are large areas of relatively stable rock that transmit the shaking a much further distance. This quake is also very shallow.

    Since I've moved to California the biggest quake I've felt has been 5.3, Alum Rock. That was just a bit more scary than a recent 3.4 in Pacifica. Your distance from the epicenter, and what you're resting on makes a world of difference. I'm less than 10 miles from Pacifica; but 30 miles from San Jose.

    1. Re:I wish my Dad were alive by xevioso · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, you'll feel a big one soon. We get those 5.8 - type quakes roughly once every two years or so on average. or at least it feels lke it. I feel a quake here in SF a few times a year, but always small.

  81. In Richmond by TXFRATBoy · · Score: 0

    I am in Richmond, Va and my building just shook for about 5 minutes. My parents are further north in Fredericksburg and said their house was swaying enough to knock things off the walls... Overall, not that big of a deal...no worse than a low flying jet...

  82. Toronto by mrops · · Score: 1

    Felt it here too. Fentle, heard air conditioning ducts crackling once/twice.

  83. Stranded in the Sky! by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

    I'm in a holding pattern above the airport in Philadelphia because all of the major airports up and down this coast have been "briefly" shut down for runway inspections. I hope the delay is briefer than the duration of my fuel reserve.

    --
    "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    1. Re:Stranded in the Sky! by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      And now I'm cleared to land.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    2. Re:Stranded in the Sky! by black+soap · · Score: 1

      Are you trying to tempt fate, to become the first confirmed case of cell-phone interference causing problems on landing?

    3. Re:Stranded in the Sky! by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      the duration of my fuel reserve

      Your fuel reserve? As in, you're posting to /. while flying a plane?

    4. Re:Stranded in the Sky! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      why not, it's one of the most boring ways to travel.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Stranded in the Sky! by trebach · · Score: 1

      The problem with cell phones in the air is partially due to the FAA officially refusing to clear them for liability reasons and the issues it causes with being connected to so many towers at once.

    6. Re:Stranded in the Sky! by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Flying on a plane is boring. Flying a plane is somewhat less so.

    7. Re:Stranded in the Sky! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there is that noise that many people hear in speakers before their phones ring that also can cause current to show up in navigation instruments.

    8. Re:Stranded in the Sky! by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      I hope the delay is briefer than the duration of my fuel reserve.

      I haven't piloted an aircraft since early 90s. Correct me if I'm mistaken, but aren't reserves supposed to give you something like half an hour after it would take to reach an alternate runway?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  84. Felt it outside DC by TripleE78 · · Score: 1

    Felt it on the third floor of my building in Rockville, MD. Shook the floor upwards a bit, figured I'm better at work than at home -- that's the 16th floor.

    That was something.

    ~EEE~

  85. Re:New Jersey (Mercer county) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Felt it here, third floor of a building. Nothing more here than a gentle sway back and forth 3-4 times.

    Felt it here, third floor of a building. Nothing more here than a gentle sway back and forth 3-4 times.

    Kris from New jesrey
    I was laying on bed watching TV at 1.45 PM today.At 1.50 I fely and heard a strange sound appearing on my bed below.Later it intensified and felt for more than a two second.It was virtually shaking and I was scared.It cooled down.I tried to reach 911 but the line was already engaged.I could finally reach and the Police enquired if everything was okay.I said it was okay.This was the first time in my life to have experienced the earth quake in this part of the world!

  86. Fastest Article Ever by A.Bettik · · Score: 1

    I think this is the fastest an event has ever made it to Slashdot.

  87. Maine by Tteddo · · Score: 1

    Felt in here in Maine. My house was moving with the beat on the radio and I was like WTF??? Then I realized.

    1. Re:Maine by SeeSp0tRun · · Score: 1

      Had an employee in our ME office ask if I felt it... I asked if the fridge was void of alcohol again.

      --
      Something witty.
  88. Ottawa and Montreal by Graham+J+-+XVI · · Score: 1

    Felt it too...

  89. Felt it in MD by doramjan · · Score: 1

    Felt it for a good 7-10 seconds in the Chesapeake Bay area.

  90. Water plant by AB3A · · Score: 1

    Our office is a small building on a concrete slab. We NEVER feel much in the way of movement. When this thing hit, I ran outside. The water storage reservoirs were making ominous oil-canning sounds on an industrial scale. Significant rumbling with some side to side movement.

    Reminder for those of you in the East Coast: Something made those Appalachian mountains. It may not be as active as the West coast, but it would be wise not to ignore it.

    --
    Nearly fifty percent of all graduates come from the bottom half of the class!
    1. Re:Water plant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Water plant by bgat · · Score: 1

      Reminder for those of you in the East Coast: Something made those Appalachian mountains. It may not be as active as the West coast, but it would be wise not to ignore it.

      I thought they were just to cover up the coal?

      --
      b.g.
    3. Re:Water plant by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      I believe most individuals "these days" think it's too much work to think about more than the fastest and easiest chemical reward.

      By the way, you're one lucky person, you. I've always wanted to experience a quake and have slept through over 5 here in the Ohio valley. This one happened while I was at work; was tilting back and forth in the chair so I wouldn't have noticed. No one I asked here in the Cincy area felt it, either.

      I respect physics and natural causes and effects. I'm a storm spotter (not chaser). I believe that explains it all pretty well.

      I'm just catching up with old friends, BTW. Glad to see that you are still active!

  91. Cincinnati by clarkholmes · · Score: 1

    Felt it here too... seems a bit far away, but perhaps it's because I'm in a hi-rise. Building swayed for several seconds, long enough for everyone here to wander out of their cubes asking if anyone else felt it.

  92. Earthquake news by GReaToaK_2000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    USGS earthquake was a 5.8 about 3.7 miles down.

    S & P downgraded it to 4.5.

    1. Re:Earthquake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      look at the chart for dominion energy (they run a nuke plant in VA) it dropped off a cliff at 2pm but now it's back up, lol

    2. Re:Earthquake news by black+soap · · Score: 1

      Somebody hurry with the mod points, this one deserves them!

    3. Re:Earthquake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL... and it was Bush's fault :)

  93. Can't Explain it by tanujt · · Score: 1

    God did it.

  94. Northern NJ by multiOSfreak · · Score: 1

    Definitely felt the whole building moving. Very new feeling for me.

    I'm sure it's no biggie for West Coast folks, but that's the first time I felt the actual ground under me move.

    1. Re:Northern NJ by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      Florham Park, NJ. Floor rumbled. General comments: "We don't get those heavy trucks any more!" (since manufacturing stopped at this plant) . . . until people realized it was going on a lot longer. NY skyscrapers sway more in the wind, but they don't rumble like this.

  95. Oblig XKCD by ryzvonusef · · Score: 1

    How did this make Slashdot already? Nothing makes this site for weeks.

    http://xkcd.com/723/
      That's how :P

    --
    I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
    1. Re:Oblig XKCD by wdsci · · Score: 1

      The first thing that went through my head when I felt the shaking was that comic. (Sadly, an XKCD reader's first instinct is not to find shelter.)

    2. Re:Oblig XKCD by ryzvonusef · · Score: 1

      As long as you survived to post about it, it doesn't matter :)

      Keep tight!

      --
      I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
  96. I wonder .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... how many stills fell over.

  97. I felt it in Philadelphia by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

    My desk started shaking around. I was more confused than anything else. My immediate impression was of some big truck passing outside, but I'm in a building far too large to be affected by that, so I finally came to the conclusion that it must've been an earthquake. Twitter confirmed the suspicion...

    Apparently it was felt all the way up the east coast. Pretty intense, by far the largest earthquake ever recorded in the area according to the USGS. The talking head on the news suggested that because this area is so geologically inactive, the crust is very cold and "bell-like" so even minor quakes tend to travel, in a way that a more plastic crust would not facilitate.

    No damage here, nor injuries, but everyone felt it. My university issued a public safety alert.

    Very strange.

    --
    I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
  98. No big deal by ericdano · · Score: 1

    *yawn* what? The east coast had an earthquake? They do get them. The history or science channel had a show about it. I think the most frightening thing is that they believe there is a huge san andreas type fault like in the Ohio valley or the Mississippi river or something.....I'll have to find the info.

    I find it funny watching all the east coast people all worried. Eh, we California people are like chill about it. Call us when you have a 6 or more quake

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
    1. Re:No big deal by QuantumPion · · Score: 1

      we aren't worried, but this was the largest earthquake to hit this area which makes it interesting and newsworthy.

    2. Re:No big deal by thestudio_bob · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the big difference between California and the east coast, is that the east coast and the midwest is essentially sitting on a solid foundations of bedrock. So when they have earthquakes it's felt and carried over greater distances. And keep in mind, that California has building codes, emergency plans and are generally prepared for earthquakes. Not so much in other parts of the country. Most buildings are old, made out of brick and have large timber beams that are not connected to anything (they just sit on the bricks).

      So, yes it is funny to watch their reactions to a small event, but it's going to be a sad day if a big one hits.

      --
      The real Sig captains the Northwestern. This one captains /.
    3. Re:No big deal by The+Dawn+Of+Time · · Score: 1

      How about we don't call you at all? We're not really in need of anyone to bring a misplaced sense of superiority to the situation.

    4. Re:No big deal by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      Eh, we California people are like chill about it. Call us when you have a 6 or more quake

      Just as long as you call us when you get an inch or 2 of snow. Deal?

    5. Re:No big deal by PRMan · · Score: 1

      We can drive to the snow whenever we want. It's only 45 minutes from Southern California...

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    6. Re:No big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i live in japan here we get 5 every day.
      a 7 or 8 will really rock your world, the 9 here was very strong ...
      but here "all" buildings are earthquake prove so no problems with the aftershocks

      but here in japan there are the last day many small ones , so may there is a big one on its way !!!
           

  99. 5.9 Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/usc0005ild.html

  100. Ha! Is that the best you can do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No injuries? No buildings damaged? Wait til they get a load of me.
          - Hurricane Irene

  101. Re:NO ONE CARES by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

    Oh no, 22% chance somebody died? We need Congress to BAN EARTHQUAKES! THINK OF THE CHILDREN!

    I felt a couple wobbles. Everyone was going out into the street to see what was going on. I don't know if they fuckin' expected the Red Army to be going down the street or a goddamned Gundam to be going rooftop-to-rooftop... it was nothin' here in Jersey.

  102. I found the cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://images.wikia.com/villains/images/3/36/427px-PICT0023.jpg

  103. Major damage in Baltimore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crumbling burned out buildings. People with vacant stares wandering the streets begging for food, money, medicine, shelter. Vast areas of the city look like a war zone.

    Oh wait, that is normal. Carry on.

    1. Re:Major damage in Baltimore by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      somebody beat you to the punch with a similar joke about Detroit.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  104. Downtown D.C. by chill · · Score: 1

    Our building shook a bit at first. Enough for me to look out the window for a big truck. Then it shook harder. That one was enough to knock some books off the shelf and get everyone to evacuate.

    Everyone picked up their cell phones at the same time and overloaded all the networks. Only Sprint worked. They must have so few customers left it doesn't matter. AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon were all useless. That includes forcing the phones to use 2G only.

    I think I need to re-new my Ham license, just in case.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:Downtown D.C. by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Businesses are shutting down and people evacuating for a 5.9? Why? Just pick the stuff up off the floor and go back to work...

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    2. Re:Downtown D.C. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Because the buildings are not built with the same codes as they are in CA, and many building are brick.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  105. Mid-air earthquare! by Daetrin · · Score: 1

    And according to USGS it was also 0.6 miles deep, with a vertical uncertainty of plus or minus 4.6 miles. Gotta watch out for those mid-air earthquakes! They're sneaky!

    From USGS

    Magnitude 5.9
    Date-Time

    Tuesday, August 23, 2011 at 17:51:03 UTC
    Tuesday, August 23, 2011 at 01:51:03 PM at epicenter

    Location 37.975ÂN, 77.969ÂW
    Depth 1 km (~0.6 mile) (poorly constrained)
    Region VIRGINIA
    Distances

    6 km (4 miles) SSE (152Â) from Louisa, VA
    6 km (4 miles) SW (236Â) from Mineral, VA
    26 km (16 miles) SE (133Â) from Gordonsville, VA
    32 km (20 miles) E (79Â) from Lake Monticello, VA
    66 km (41 miles) NW (318Â) from Richmond, VA
    134 km (83 miles) SW (219Â) from Washington, DC

    Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 10.9 km (6.8 miles); depth +/- 7.4 km (4.6 miles)
    Parameters NST=390, Nph=390, Dmin=57.9 km, Rmss=1.17 sec, Gp= 47Â,
    M-type=regional moment magnitude (Mw), Version=6

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    1. Re:Mid-air earthquare! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The previous post's cited location (4 miles SSE of Louisa, 4 miles SW of Mineral) looks right in line with the fault through the North Anna nuclear Power reactor buildings (by eyeball from Google maps). If anyone could check a geology map, maybe that could firm it up.

      If this does get confirmed, does the NRC pull North Anna operating permit? Does anybody scream?

      Note, there is a 6.8 mile uncertainty, but still

    2. Re:Mid-air earthquare! by trebach · · Score: 1

      Reactors were automatically shut down for inspection at the plant.

  106. Some felt it in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm in Ottawa, and about half of my workplace noticed it. I didn't.

    1. Re:Some felt it in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next time your coworkers tell you that you're insensitive, you better believe them.

  107. Reached Central Vermont by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My coworkers and I felt it in a concrete-floor metal factory building - just a few light shakes but enough to get people out of the building to see what was going on.

  108. Historical activity? by PPH · · Score: 1

    Anyone have a map of past quakes in this region? Its difficult to judge how unusual this even is. Anecdotally, it seems that such events are more rare on the east coast than out west. Californians probably wouldn't get out of bed for a 5.8.

    And what sort of seismograph coverage does the east coast have? Its pretty good on the west coast, what with all the faults, volcanoes and whatnot.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Historical activity? by QuantumPion · · Score: 2

      This was the biggest one to hit virginia since records.

      http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/states/events/1897_05_31.php

    2. Re:Historical activity? by Relayman · · Score: 1

      You must be new to this Internet thing. You should pick up the phone, call the operator, and ask her.

      --
      If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
  109. Colorado, Virginia and next... by thestudio_bob · · Score: 1

    This should put some pressure on New Madrid. Nothing says earthquake safety like thousands of 100 year old brick buildings scattered across the midwest.

    --
    The real Sig captains the Northwestern. This one captains /.
  110. Hipster time by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    *Yawn* Here in So Cal we don't even get out of bed for a 5.8.

    OK, that's done.

    1. Re:Hipster time by TeethWhitener · · Score: 3, Funny

      Here in So Cal

      If my conservative friends are to be believed, you guys don't get out of bed for much of anything.

    2. Re:Hipster time by geekoid · · Score: 1

      And we call that 'wining'.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Hipster time by smellotron · · Score: 1

      you guys don't get out of bed for much of anything.

      And we call that 'wining'.

      I can't tell if that's a typo for whining or winning, or if you're really talking about drinking wine in bed. I think all three sound about right, depending on your perspective.

  111. Thought terrorist attack at first to be honest by mps01060 · · Score: 1

    My building in DC was evacuated after this. It was actually powerful enough to knock a TV off the all and a few plant pots onto the ground. To be honest, when it struck I couldn't help but think terrorist attack before earthquake crossed my mind.

  112. Isn't the capital of VA near there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Richmond, but all of the reports are related to the pussies in Boston, New York, and Washington DC. I guess there's just not enough "pearl clutching" going on down here.

    FYI - I grew up in NoVA and have lived here all of my life and have never felt (or noticed) an earthquake before, so it was a neat experience. Bring on that bitch Irene!

  113. Re:NO ONE CARES by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 1

    If that were true...why would he strike when Congress is in recess and the President's on vacation?

    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
  114. Re:New Jersey (Mercer county) by Grizzley9 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Kris from New jesrey I was laying on bed watching TV at 1.45 PM today.At 1.50 I fely and heard a strange sound appearing on my bed below.Later it intensified and felt for more than a two second.It was virtually shaking and I was scared.It cooled down.I tried to reach 911 but the line was already engaged.I could finally reach and the Police enquired if everything was okay.I said it was okay.This was the first time in my life to have experienced the earth quake in this part of the world!

    Why would you call 911? Especially since everything was OK? It's more rhetorical since this is an AC but this is sometimes why the lines get tied up in an emergency, clueless people jamming the emergency lines for no reason.

  115. Didn't feel it, but my coworkers said they did by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

    I don't know if my coworkers are a bunch of liars or not, but they claim to have felt an Earthquake around 1:50pm.

    Personally, I didn't feel a thing.

    However, our company sent an email to all employees in our building stating that there were reports of slight building movements throughout the entire complex, likely due to this Earthquake.

    --
    GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  116. My favorite thing to come of the earthquake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "According to Associated Press, it 'was felt as far north as Rhode Island, New York City and Martha's Vineyard, Mass., where President Barack Obama was dancing.'."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Anna_Nuclear_Generating_Station

  117. Funny, but by GungaDan · · Score: 2

    slashdot was the one website I was able to access on 9/11/2001 while everyone else's tubes were clogged. Say what you will about the articles or the commentary or the curious sometime lack of editing prowess, but at least the dudes who run this joint have their shit together enough to keep it online when most others freeze up.

    --
    Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    1. Re:Funny, but by bedouin · · Score: 1

      Goatse was up too.

  118. Impact on Touchpad Deliveries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Between this and the impending hurricane I'm concerned my Touchpad may be delivered a day or two late.

  119. Lets hope... by sweet+'n+sour · · Score: 1

    Lets hope this wasn't some evil mastermind calling the US politician's bluff about some world extortion plan.

  120. Overreaction! by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    A 5.9 earthquake is nothing to scoff at, but the media is already seriously blowing this out of proportion.

    I've been in two comparably strong earthquake in Asia. Everyone looks at each other for a second, the shaking gets more violent and we all bolt for the doors going outside. The ground stops moving, but stuff like lightpoles keep swaying for a bit longer. Fairly quickly everyone is assured that it's not a big one and everyone goes back to their normal routine. Anyone who was stuck inside doesn't even bother going outside.

    It's comical the way people in DC are streaming into the streets. Don't panic!

    1. Re:Overreaction! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're being chased out into the street by a booming voice in their heads going "o no the arabs are coming to get me" when the ground shakes a little.

    2. Re:Overreaction! by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Something to consider is that in areas that regularly get earthquakes of a given level buildings are built to tolerate them. Whereas if a quake is stronger than anything that has previously been known to hit an area buidlings will not have been designed to tolerate it.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  121. I picked a helluva day to stop sniffing glue. by KillaBeave · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't you be flying the plane rather than posting on Slashdot? Or does Kareem have that covered? :)

    1. Re:I picked a helluva day to stop sniffing glue. by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      LOL

      If I had mod points, you'd get a funny. And don't call me Shirley!

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  122. Wusses by MunkieLife · · Score: 1

    Oh please... I live in Indonesia. A 5.9 earthquake barely even makes the news. A 5.9 is like, "Uhhh, hrmm, something feels strange, am I feeling a bit dizzy? Oh no, it's just a small earthquake."

    Seriously though, the depth of the earthquake makes a big difference and this one seemed to be shallow, so I can imagine most people clearly felt it. However, the shake map looks pretty tame. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/shakemap/global/shake/c0005ild/

  123. Re:NO ONE CARES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sure it's not a difference in building methods/materials that would cause greater damage on the east coast than on the west coast from an equally-powerful quake?

  124. VA to MA? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

    If it was felt from "VA to MA" wouldn't that put the epicenter around NYC? I would expect you to find reports from somewhere more like GA or such to MA....or was this a unidirectional quake that only sent waves north?

    oh and yes.... was definitely felt in Boston. Actually, I think this is the first quake that I ever noticed and was able to attribute to being as such. If I have ever felt any others, it was indistinguishable from the washing machine being loaded slightly badly.

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    1. Re:VA to MA? by CongealedSalad · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was felt as far south as GA. I felt it in NC.

      --
      In theory I am an agnostic, but pending the appearance of radical evidence I must be classed as an Atheist.
    2. Re:VA to MA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, everyone is brain dead south of Virginia.

    3. Re:VA to MA? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      I figured as much. Far less likely that they got the epicenter wrong than the extent was specified in a brain dead way. I mean... really? It was felt in VA? Who would have thought that you would actually feel it...where it is happening. Heh.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  125. This is a good thing. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Far too many builders do so-so to piss poor construction. Now that ppl are realizing that they can be hit with a much larger quake, they will want to change their tunes. KB homes, Richmond, etc. All crap.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:This is a good thing. by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Don't bet on it. Virginia was just had it's seismic values reduced two code cycles ago. Not that it matters, wind controls most of the time anyway, and always with houses.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:This is a good thing. by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Any wood frame home that meets any sort of modern code requirement (like 70's onward) is going to do absolutely fine in an earthquake. Wood frames are exceptional dampeners and highly flexible, though the drywall may crack and the brick veneer might fall off the basic structure will remain unmolested. The only real danger in residential housing is unreinforced masonry (not brick veneer). The biggest killer in residential homes during earthquakes is an unreinforced brick chimney tumbling into the house and killing the occupants. The most frequent damage to a residential house in an earthquake is the house bouncing off the foundation due to the lack of "hurricane straps" that became code in the 90's.

      Regardless of your intentional defamation of the builders you listed if they complied with the local building codes their homes will do fine in earthquakes and other disasters that are accounted for in the code. In fact the newer the homes the more strict the code requirements and the better they will handle disasters. You better hope your intentional defamation doesn't draw a lawsuit.

    3. Re:This is a good thing. by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      > The most frequent damage to a residential house in an earthquake is the house
      > bouncing off the foundation

      So, what, the long bolt that goes through the sill plate rips out of the concrete? Does it normally fall apart or do the floor joists and plywood hold things together well enough that you can jack it back up and slide it back on the foundation?

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  126. Re:NO ONE CARES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's both. There are no earthquake codes here for one. Second, earthquakes travel farther from the epicenter due to bedrock type and lack of fault lines.

  127. Re:New Jersey (Mercer county) by black+soap · · Score: 2

    Why would you call 911? Especially since everything was OK? It's more rhetorical since this is an AC but this is sometimes why the lines get tied up in an emergency, clueless people jamming the emergency lines for no reason.

    And not just to call 911. It is not uncommon in the afternoon before expected hurricane landfall for cell phones to not be able to place calls, as so many people are tying up the lines calling everybody they can think of, just to chat about eachother's hurricane preps. Everybody so quick to jump online and check the news sites, change their status, etc. from their mobile device, I'm surprised any calls to 911 even get through.

  128. DC (Bethesda/Chevy Chase area) by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 1

    Felt it bad here, I work in a 50-year-old building. No way this place stays intact if a sustained quake hits.

  129. Re:NO ONE CARES by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

    It was a shot across the bow ;)

    --
    -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  130. Felt it here in Maine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We felt it here in Maine. I looked at the USGS site and didn't see anything in our area, so I discounted it. Now I realize I was feeling it from VA!

  131. Asheville, NC by CongealedSalad · · Score: 1

    Felt it in Asheville, NC. About 20 seconds of slight shaking. No big deal, but still weird if you've never felt a quake before.

    --
    In theory I am an agnostic, but pending the appearance of radical evidence I must be classed as an Atheist.
    1. Re:Asheville, NC by ProzacPatient · · Score: 1

      I felt it up here in Pilot Mountain, NC. The shaking lasted for maybe one or two minutes and it was strong enough to cause my monitor to wobble, and yes it did feel weird.
      There are only two other times I've felt something similar; when a bulldozer was making way for a road near my house a couple years ago and when the air force was doing practice flights or something over my neighborhood.

  132. Turnabout? by Burning1 · · Score: 1

    My east coast friends always made fun of us California for shutting down our roads and schools for an inch of snow. Guess the shoe is on the other foot now? :p

    1. Re:Turnabout? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I'm waiting for some FEMA money to come up so I can say, "It serves those idiots right for living someplace where there are Earthquakes! My tax dollars should not help people who make dumb decisions about where to buy a house!"

    2. Re:Turnabout? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would disagree. This was the largest quake I've felt. I stood up, looked outside, said "Cool!" to a co-worker, and sat back down to work when it was over. I only left the building when the floor safety Nazi made me. I asked her why we were evacuating - she said, "It's company policy to evacuate the building after a natural disaster." I told her "You and I have vastly different definitions of 'natural disaster'". She was not amused.

  133. felt it here by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

    Lanham, MD. The floor swayed, didn't hear anything. A few ceiling tiles fell.

    --
    Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
  134. Re:NO ONE CARES by Amouth · · Score: 1

    not true.. 5.8 = 5.8

    even though geology is different - for the area's the 5.8 is the measured amplitude of the strongest seismic wave.

    USGS is pointing this one as a 5.9 at a depth of 1km.. luckily it i was in the middle of nowhere - had it been centered on a city on the eastern seaboard it this could have been a very bad earthquake.

    http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsus/Maps/US2/37.39.-79.-77_eqs.php

    --
    '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  135. Important report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would just like to report that the earthquake was not felt in Wisconsin. Based on what everybody is posting, it looks like it would be easier to say where it was not felt. So, Wisconsin...clear.

  136. "...government buildings evacuated..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Estimated loss of productivity: negative $235,000,000

  137. Baltimore Area by AndOne · · Score: 1

    I work a bit south of Baltimore. We felt it here for about 30 seconds. Of course my office is next to shipping and I thought maybe they'd finally lost it and knocked all the shelves over in an attempt to crush me finally. But nope.. earth quake. They've evacuated a number of office buildings in downtown Baltimore from what my wife is saying (she was sent home). Her brother said he felt it as far as Ft. Wayne IN as well.

    --
    I don't care what you say, all I need is my Wumpabet soup.
  138. Warrenton VA by jgeboski · · Score: 1

    About 70 miles from the epicenter here in Warrenton, VA. Few pictures moved on the walls, few things thrown off some shelves but, nothing serious. My local community college took a bit of damage, and is currently closed "until further notice". Maybe the world is coming to an end...

  139. Re:New Jersey (Mercer county) by Krojack · · Score: 1

    And when someone calls 911, they HAVE to dispatch someone out to the location even if the caller said everything is ok. I have a sister that worked as a 911 dispatcher for several years and they had to do this many times.

  140. Detroit - third world - now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now?

  141. here in central pa by rrossman2 · · Score: 1

    Here in central pa (huntingdon and Alexandria) its as if you only noticed it indoors. My father-in-law said the shelves at his work vibrated, and the sister-in-law came out and asked if I felt anything (digging a support pole for a deck extension at their place)... I said no and both her and her mom said they did inside and the neighbor did too... weird as I was on the ground digging with a crazy small shovel due to it being a tight spot.. felt nothing)

  142. ...didn't feel a thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Waltham (15 miles West of Boston) ... felt nothing on the 3rd floor of our office building... but I've had about 18 cups of coffee by 2PM on a typical day, so it would probably take an 8.0 before I'd notice anything...

    http://jmckinley.posterous.com/dc-earthquake-devastation

  143. Wow you Californians must be so tough! by jpstanle · · Score: 1

    I understand the natural instinct for Californians to be dismissive, but this was the largest quake in the recorded history of Virginia, and the strongest on the east coast in over 100 years. The media is over-hyping it for sure, but it is historically and scientifically significant. Also, keep in mind that buildings on the east coast are not designed to withstand seismic events to the same extent as those in California, and are on the whole MUCH older than west coast buildings.

    Good Virginia Earthquake Information

    1. Re:Wow you Californians must be so tough! by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      Of course, I was born/raised in Tennessee in Memphis. Perhaps you've heard of the New Madrid faultline? Wussies.

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
  144. Re:NO ONE CARES by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

    Mod points if I had them...very well put.

    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  145. Yet I missed the one this morning... by embolalia · · Score: 1

    Albany, NY. Felt it lightly; saw some water moving in a bottle, nothing else. Odd thing is, there was a 2.2 in Albany County at 6:35 this morning, and I didn't feel it at all. Either way, this is obviously an indication of the end of the world and we should all panic.

  146. Good Reference Material on Virginia Quakes by jpstanle · · Score: 1

    Good Information on history and science of earthquakes in Virginia

    I found interesting that the chances of a quake in excess of 4.75 magnitude in Virginia over 100 years are 10-20%. This quake was over ten times as powerful at a 5.9.

  147. California's Seismic Diaspora by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 1

    A few days ago it was Colorado, now Virginia. Even the earthquakes are leaving California for more fertile ground. Pretty soon there will be nothing but terremotos and tsunamis out here.

  148. Pfff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wimps. Same magnitude here last year, didn't really care. Get these all the time here. Ignored it went back to sleep.
    Build your houses from real materials (not just wood slapped together) and you won't be bothered by tremors like these.

  149. Central Jersey by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

    My desk is connected to the wall, and started shaking. Being as I'm technically in the basement though, there wasn't any actual swaying (no red stapler jokes now!)
    At first I thought maybe two coworkers were going at it like Rhodesian mud bunnies in the adjacent office or something. Umm.. not that that happens here a lot.

    --

    Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    1. Re:Central Jersey by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Now's your chance to burn the place down.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  150. Brickton by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

    Didn't feel a thing and don't give a shit.

    --
    Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
  151. Re:NO ONE CARES by MakinBacon · · Score: 1

    If this didn't happen in such a rural county, there could have been major damage. Virginia doesn't get earthquakes very often, and our buildings aren't made to with stand them. There were some reports of buildings that caved in in Mineral - imagine what would have happened if the epicenter was in a more urban area like Arlington or Richmond.

    Not only that, but our emergency crews aren't prepared to respond. Most of our people have never even felt earthquakes.

  152. Any damage seen on Facebook? by safetyinnumbers · · Score: 1

    I noticed this first on the USGS website, and was alarmed to see that the quake was near Farmville

  153. Richmond by trebach · · Score: 1

    I was on the second floor when things started rattling and we all went outside. It took about 2 minutes for the event to stop.

  154. Rochester, NY by cvtan · · Score: 1

    I felt nothing, but I might have been asleep...

    --
    Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
    1. Re:Rochester, NY by slothman32 · · Score: 1

      Slothman, is that you?
      I am here as well and I also felt nothing and I also was asleep.
      Weird!
      I wanted to be awake to feel it. :(

      At least I was awake for the other one a few months ago.
      Well I was awake for the large truck on the road that was actually a quake.

      --
      Why don't you guys have friends or journals?
  155. VA Quake was along unknown fault line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Obama administration has announced that the newly discovered fault line runs just south of DC all the way into Texas and will be name "Bush's Fault"

  156. Cape May, NJ by darkspark · · Score: 1

    I felt it while on the beach in cape may new jersey, everyone was like "wtf" I thought it was kinda cool.

  157. Re:New Jersey (Mercer county) by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

    If I had to guess, it would be because he/she was "virtually shaking and [...] scared"? That doesn't warrant calling 911 but that's the reason he/she did it. Not hard to understand.

  158. The best quake tweets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/top-16-earthquake-tweets/2011/08/23/gIQANgmJZJ_blog.html

  159. Finally! The appropriate time to use this joke!! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    You Mama's so fat, when she walks across the living room she makes the radio skip!!

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  160. Its very difficult to resolve depth by peter303 · · Score: 1

    They basicially use over-determined triangulation to calculate epicenter coordinates. When the epicenter is close to the plane of seismometers, the vertical resolution is terrible. So they fix an arbitrary default depth to the quake to calculate lateral position.

    GPS altitude resolution is poor for the same reason.

    1. Re:Its very difficult to resolve depth by adonoman · · Score: 1

      I understand the process and the difficulty in determining the exact location - especially while new data is still coming in, and before all the data is collated. I was just amusing myself at the symmetric uncertainty boundaries when the real uncertainty was obviously skewed in favour of the earthquake happening below the surface, rather than miles above it.

    2. Re:Its very difficult to resolve depth by smellotron · · Score: 1

      I was just amusing myself at the symmetric uncertainty boundaries when the real uncertainty was obviously skewed in favour of the earthquake happening below the surface, rather than miles above it.

      It's a complex earthquake. Just because you can't see it in three dimensions doesn't mean its location doesn't project to a real point in the sky.

  161. Re:Felt in Vermont--Boston, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sitting in my house (messing with computer, of course :) and it felt like the house was bouncing up and down. went on for (I didn't time it) maybe a minute or so, variable strength.

  162. Re:NO ONE CARES by reboot246 · · Score: 1

    God does want us to give to the poor, but only as individuals, not as citizens being taxed to death. You can't get to Heaven spending the money of others.

  163. Big Location reveals on /. today. Privacy?? by vlueboy · · Score: 1

    Slightly OT: The US can't reach and mess with European slashdotters, so they have much less qualms before stating what neighborhood they live in for all the world to see (forever). Japan's first quake/reactor story had a handful of responders indicating location earlier this year as well as slashdot-JAPAN comments partially translated in very informative efforts of a couple brave souls who said exactly where they got hit.

    Despite ALL that, I've NEVER seen so many stating their location --remember that a few months down the road you're the same guys who might just jokingly post the DeCSS key or "You sank my battleship" re-twit. I guess this is how social engineering wins --feelings of helpfulness and disaster collaboration lower our defenses. For those who don't get it, American slashdotters are very secretive about giving up their location on a permanent storage medium because there are so many stalkers and LAWYERS with fingers in the right triggers.

    It doesn't matter that a street address wasn't given; to someone dedicated to enough of a payoff, we all fall little by little; just like how everyone here agrees that "physical access makes that 1,000,000bit encryption key useless." Someone with an axe to grind can now google those /. nicks and add "earthquake" to find your town. Based on town, and your posting time, it narrows down which ISPs they need to subpoena for an IP address, without even knocking on Slashdot's doors.

    1. Re:Big Location reveals on /. today. Privacy?? by paleo2002 · · Score: 1

      Wow, you're right. All someone who hates my screen name has to do is bribe a bunch of ISP and/or FCC employees (I hear they like straw) in the region of the country I've stated living in and they can hunt me down. These modern times we live in sure are scary. Next thing you know they'll be printing up big lists of everyone's name, address, and phone number and just giving them away Imagine how unsafe we'd all be then!

  164. Missed It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was operating a floor stripping machine (about a 7 on the Richter Scale) and missed it.

    Aftershock please?

  165. Re:NO ONE CARES by Cwix · · Score: 1

    Trying to take out the root of the problem. Lobbyists.

    --
    You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
  166. Felt it in the Bronx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The chairs in the data center were sliding side to side (inch or so), saw my iced coffee sloshing as well.

  167. I agree with this, and laugh at it. by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    Saw that already; both funny and informative seem appropriate.

    I'm working in one of DC's Virginia suburbs this summer, and I definitely noticed my office walls shake for a few seconds in a couple bursts around 2 PM.
    However, I admit I _am_ kinda in "no big deal" mode about the whole thing.

    The building evacuations were more annoying. (of my office building, my highrise apartment building and assorted retail facilities where I may have run errands.)

    Building security hustled us out, but I had already picked up most of my stuff. We waited around a bit before finding out that we were headed home for the day as opposed to going back in and finishing the day after the building was cleared. (I was reminded of school fire drills that ran 15 to 30 minutes or so.)

    I live less than half a mile from the office, and took my bicycle like usual. Most people were trying to get out by car, and I was reminded of a crowd leaving a concert/sporting event - the vehicle traffic was bad enough that walking or bicycle riding was actually a quicker way out.

    However, the apartment complex’s staff still had the elevators turned off, so I rode the bicycle around a bit to kill time/blow off steam, and eventually had dinner at a nearby fast food place that hadn’t closed down for the day.

    I ended up back in the apartment by about the time I would have retuned from a normal work day.

    However, I do need to deal with the fact that my phone’s texting keypads were coincidentally on the fritz.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  168. Re:Building Swaying Gently 10th Floor Toronto, Ont by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    went outside to bird dog the girls streaming out of the building

    Doin' it rite

  169. Important Subjective Update by Roachie · · Score: 1

    I'm in Arizona... didnt feel a thing.

    --
    This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
  170. 1 of 4 diesel generator failed at North Anna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.chron.com/news/article/Quake-rattles-nerves-but-infrastructure-holds-up-2138099.php

    1 diesel generator fails. And steam releases. Nukes, safe at any speed, especially run by cost cutting corporations.

    http://edition.cnn.com/2011/US/08/23/virginia.quake/
    "Dominion Virginia Power said both reactors at its North Anna plant, less than 20 miles from the epicenter, shut down after the first tremors. Reidelbach said the plant vented steam, but there was no release of radioactive material."

    And we believe that no radiation released, right? Of course, it will be revised later, like Fukushima or the BP Gulf of Mex. oil leak. My guess is cracked pipes
    all over the rear end of the reactor, start running you Dixie trailer trash. You are hosed, and news flash, no one gives a krapo about your health.

    Oh, but it is a totally unforeseen event, the like has never happened in recorded history, just like Fukushima. Who ever heard of earthquakes and tsunami in Japan?

  171. Northwest Indiana by JD-1027 · · Score: 1

    Many of us felt it at Notre Dame. I got up right away and asked the lady in the cube over if she felt it too, and she did. Many at another building on campus felt it as well. It was very clear to me, my office chair rocked back and forth slowly.

  172. I'm from California, and live here still; a 5.8 would be all over the news unless it was in the middle of East Bumfuck, San Bernardino County. [...] So yes, I know that in California we generally take these things in stride (though I guarantee you would be talking about a 5.8 if it hit near you), but just quit with the bullshit.

    Yup. The most recent comparable earthquake I can recall here in the San Francisco Peninsula was the 2007 Alum Rock Earthquake, a 5.6. It was very noticeable, many people stopped working and spent the next 10 minutes chatting about it and browsing the web for information about it. It was a minor nationwide news story, meriting an AP story and brief mentions in CNN and the likes, and there were a few local stories the next day about the minor damage close to the epicenter. But then after that nobody really talks about it anymore.

    A 5.9 in the east coast, well, that's a modest quake, but it's also a "Man bites dog" story.

  173. Re:New Jersey (Mercer county) by cusco · · Score: 1

    Indeed. That's the reason we keep a land line, because if there's any major incident (and here in Seattle that can be two inches of snow) the cell system is clogged. With a land line you sometimes can't make a local call but you can almost always call long distance. Disaster recovery plans for your family should include an out-of-state number (granny, aunt, sister, friend, whatever) where messages can be left for each other.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  174. tremors felt in Maine by CosaNostra+Pizza+Inc · · Score: 1

    I felt the tremors in southern Maine.

  175. Felt in Central PA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I felt the quake in south central PA. I was confused at first when things started to sway. I thought it was a truck rolling by, a huge gust of wind or someone jumping around in my building but quickly I realized that the whole building was swaying and it wasn't just vibrations from within. It lasted for 5-10 seconds if I recall. As soon as the shaking stopped I was on the internet looking at USGS to see where it was. Like many others this is the first quake I have actually felt. I have heard reports of smaller quakes throughout my life but never really felt any until now.

  176. This is punishment for attacks on Libya. by luk3Z · · Score: 0

    This is punishment for attacks on Libya.

    --
    Recipes for USA bankrupt - http://tinypaste.com/0d66f dd = dollar deluge (printed in the infinity)
  177. Re:NO ONE CARES by smellotron · · Score: 1

    Everyone was going out into the street to see what was going on. I don't know if they fuckin' expected the Red Army to be going down the street or a goddamned Gundam to be going rooftop-to-rooftop...

    In fairness to them, you would feel pretty stupid if you were the only guy in Jersey to miss a Gundam hopping around the rooftops!

  178. XKCD by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    I was trying to reference the linking-to-the-obligatory-XKCD phenomenon without quite doing it myself.
    And xkcd.com/number is pretty straightforward. :)

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  179. twice by quadrox · · Score: 1

    twice

  180. New Fault Discovered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Obama administration announced today that a previously undiscovered fault was the source of yesterday's East Coast Earthquake - it was Bush's Fault.

  181. Twas about 30 miles from me by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

    Sounded like the dryer was VERY unbalanced.

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  182. Western Henrico County, V a. by Trailwalker · · Score: 1

    About 40 miles from Mineral. Home to the world's greatest Used IBook distributor.

    Wife and I were taking an afternoon nap. Building starts vibrating and rattling.

    Asked the wife (california girl) Earthquake?

    "Yes, do you have them here?"

    She didn't want to hear about Virginia seismologic happenings or the thermally active areas in the state. She just went back to sleep.

    I got up and googled for info, which was abundantly available, then turned on the TV. The local channels were into full info mode and went on for hours about the quake. Various politicians and other vultures put in their expected appearances and offered mostly uniformed opinions. The worst consequence seems to have been the early let off of all government workers in DC which jammed transportation in NVa.

  183. Message for You Sir by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

    He even broke parts of the National Cathedral - Turns out, He's not Episcopal .... He's Quaker.

    --
    Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
  184. Re:NO ONE CARES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God wants them to tax the rich (never God's favorite folks) and spend more money on poor people

    Funny, I must have missed the part where Jesus forced the rich guy to drop more money into the offering box in that widow's mite story. And the part where Jesus told the poor people that they didn't have to pay taxes to Caesar, I don't remember that one either. I guess I need to study my Bible a little better. Or maybe your Bible's just different. Can I possibly get a copy of that?

  185. Re:NO ONE CARES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, gotcha. Thanks for explaining what you meant by the difference in geology. :)

    (CAPTCHA: informed)