Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Best Inexpensive VPS Provider?

David Greene writes "After many years of waiting for my provider to upgrade DSL service from the measly 1.5 Mbps I have now, I've decided to go another route. Unfortunately, no other provider in the area (Twin Cities) offers static IPs and permission to run servers. I am looking for a VPS solution to host the public parts of my personal site. What can the Slashdot community recommend as a good, inexpensive VPS provider for personal use? This will mainly be hosting a blog and a couple of Free Software projects (wikis, git repositories, etc.). I would prefer something with KVM so I can manage my own OS install but I am open to other options. Root shell access is essential."

248 of 375 comments (clear)

  1. FDC Servers by InterestingFella · · Score: 5, Informative

    I can't but recommend FDC servers. I've used them off and on since 2008. I've also tried many others but there's always been something wrong with them. Never had problems with FDC tho. They also give unlimited bandwidth so you don't need to worry about extra costs, and they have three datacenters. Two in US (Chicago and Denver) and one in EU (Czech). Servers are also quickly set up. They're an established company too. I've had a few porn sites hosted there, and anyone in the industry knows how demanding those can be on hardware and bandwidth. Never had any problems with FDC tho. Their VPS plans start at $9/month which is hard to beat. Even shitty providers have higher price.

    I would avoid any unknown company. While there most likely are many good ones that are less known, it's a hit or miss. Sometimes they just close, either because it was unprofitable for them or just for no reason. There's many VPS providers who are just run by some guy, who leases the servers from DC's. So go with established company that has their own datacenters and years of experience. You save lots of headache.

    1. Re:FDC Servers by SomePgmr · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'll have to check that one out... I'm always on the lookout.

      I used to use Slicehost, but they haven't really improved anything in years and they were not staying competitive on pricing. I've been migrating everything over to Linode, which I really like.

      Those both have the usual local console feature, in case something goes wrong.

    2. Re:FDC Servers by InterestingFella · · Score: 3, Informative

      Stop spamming your referral code. HostGator is awful. You're only promoting it because when people use that nosopa25percent code you get paid like $50.

    3. Re:FDC Servers by InterestingFella · · Score: 4, Informative

      Btw, if you really want to sign up with HostGator, then see their blog. They offer 50% off with the official NOSOPA promo code, not 25% what this joker Shikaku is spamming with his own referral code.

    4. Re:FDC Servers by seifried · · Score: 1

      It seems like every time I see a link to a site on hostgator from Slashdot or Reddit I always get the "this account has been suspended by hostgator for exceeding bandwidth use" or whatever, so no thanks. Something that can't handle a simple slashdotting or redditing is kind of useless.

    5. Re:FDC Servers by PCM2 · · Score: 2

      HostGator is awful.

      Just out of curiosity, what is so "awful" about it? I use Hostgator and it's always been fine for me -- certainly much better than the last couple of hosting providers I used. Customer service is competent and they've always resolved my issues quickly. I have shell access. All the quotas are essentially unlimited. It's cheap. What's not to like?

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    6. Re:FDC Servers by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      Was it that hard to read the blog?

    7. Re:FDC Servers by Thesis · · Score: 4, Informative

      I had a machine colocated at FDC in Chicago, at CBOT, for two years. Here is my take on their service from my personal experience. The service was cheap, and attractive to me at the time, for I was just getting my feet wet in colocating. I found the bandwidth at that time (2006-08) was terrible in consistency, and oversold. I guess what I am really trying to say is their network went down quicker, and more frequently, than a cheap street walker. When the network was up (as in their equipment not letting out the magic smoke, or maintenance degrading the service temporarily for upgrades), the DDOS attacks on the network were crippling and frequent. I found out quickly through other customers there, that it was a haven for botnets, and IRC servers, which were always at war with each other or someone else. As far as physical support to a machine (needing a reboot, help diagnose an issue such as bad network card/cable) the service was always prompt, and bang on. Due to the constant network issues though, I moved my box to Texas in late 2008 to a different provider, and I am much happier.

      Things may have changed there since I have used them, but I do not know. They were in the middle of additional network and bandwidth upgrades when I left. Perhaps it is better now, I really do not know. I have read that they currently do not have a SLA (Service Level Agreement). Granted, you are looking for a VPS rather than colocation, but I felt it best to give you my experience from when I was a customer, for the network & bandwidth availability are important no matter where you are. I also suggest reading all the different opinions folks will post here, then research the options you are interested in. WebHostingTalk http://www.webhostingtalk.com/ is another useful tool for you in your research of a provider before making a final decision IMHO.

    8. Re:FDC Servers by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 1

      Would you mind to tell us, as a proof you aren't a spammer/advertizer, what is the domain name that you host with them?

    9. Re:FDC Servers by glitch0 · · Score: 2

      They oversell like crazy. A friend of mine used to work for them. Seriously, they put 8,000 sites on a single server. hostnine.com is just as bad and also greatly oversells their servers as well. It's funny though, if you go in live chat and ask "how many other sites will be on my server with me?" they'll always say "oh less than 100" which is completely false.

      This is only true of their shared hosting service though. I can't speak for their VPS service. Also their founder Brent Oxley is a giant douche.

      --
      -Glitch "We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds." - Linus Torvalds
    10. Re:FDC Servers by glitch0 · · Score: 2

      Yeah they give you Unlimited* bandwidth, which is very different from truly unlimited bandwidth.

      The asterisk means that they can suspend your account whenever they want for using too much bandwidth. It's so funny to never see the word unlimited without the asterisk in the hosting world.

      --
      -Glitch "We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds." - Linus Torvalds
    11. Re:FDC Servers by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      If he told us what domains he was hosting, wouldn't that MAKE him a spammer here?

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    12. Re:FDC Servers by mrops · · Score: 1

      I have been using internetvps.com 19.99 plan for about 6 months, most recommended.

      1GB ram 100gb hd, and unmetered bandwidth.

      they also have a 9.99 plan which seems better than what FDC is offering.

    13. Re:FDC Servers by Skal+Tura · · Score: 1

      FDC *sigh*
      One of the worst providers there is.

      They are cheap not by ingenuity but by being too frugal which causes issues, commodity hardware HAPHAZARDLY assembled.
      Granted performance is nice - when things work.

    14. Re:FDC Servers by ep32g79 · · Score: 1

      I use Swvps been with them for three years now

      $9.99
      50GB drive space
      1 GB guaranteed ram, 2GB burst
      1000 GB Bandwidth

      Their ticket response time is kind of slow but if you know what you are doing in linux it isnt much of an issue.
      I would highly recommend either the Texas or California location. The Pennsylvania one is up and down all the time.

    15. Re:FDC Servers by causality · · Score: 3, Informative

      50% off the first month or 25% off the entire order is your choice. And that what is to say that you're not spamming your own referral code when they both are nosopa?

      The point is, if you had one shred of integrity you would have clearly stated up-front that you derive a monetary benefit from someone using the code that you supplied. Then the readers can decide on their own whether this makes your advice biased and unworthy of consideration. Being aware of that, you "conveniently" omitted that part.

      Such an omission had to have been intentional. It is a lie by omission and that makes you a liar.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    16. Re:FDC Servers by InterestingFella · · Score: 1

      They have a separate network for IRC networks now. I wasn't using them in 2006, but later in 2008. By far they've been great. I guess they worked out their problems with IRC servers by separating them on other network.

    17. Re:FDC Servers by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 2

      Observation bias? After all, the sites that are up, you don't know who hosts them...

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    18. Re:FDC Servers by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 1

      They are kind of expensive.... I go through DMEHosting:

      Full root shell SSH access to a Linux install that you can customize ( except kernel / swap since it is openVZ + hyperVM )

      50GB disk allocation

      2 Itanium ( at least my box anyways ) cores with shared time ( and if you bitch about speeds enough they put you on a nice quiet box.... )

      768MB ram with ~1-1.2GB burst

      1.5TB xfer on shared 100Mbit line ( see above about speeds.... I usually can push at the least 20Mbit / 2 MB/sec out ) and if you exceed 1.5TB they throttle you to 10Mbit

      Nice fast support and only pay 9 / month.

      --
      To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
    19. Re:FDC Servers by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Not if it was requested. It would, however, make him a network abuser there when he got slashdotted. :)

    20. Re:FDC Servers by David+Greene · · Score: 1

      I checked a lot of providers referred by lowendbox.com. The problem is you don't know which ones are solid providers and which are fly-by-night operations run out of someone's dorm room. I found a lot of sites that looked less than reputable to me. Hence the question.

      --

    21. Re:FDC Servers by brantondaveperson · · Score: 2

      Since you're not offering them unlimited cash you can kind of see their point of view.

    22. Re:FDC Servers by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 1

      What if he was working for FDC Servers...

    23. Re:FDC Servers by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Except we're not offering them Unlimited* cash, either. It's not
      denying you truly unlimited bandwidth that's scummy. It's being cagey and lying outright (legally, maybe, the asterisk is good enough to stave off charges of false advertisement. From a decency standpoint? Not even close).

    24. Re:FDC Servers by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Well that's a pretty good point. My experience has always been a fixed amount of traffic per month, and if you bust your cap then your site gets replaced with a boilerplate 'over limit' page. Related: Telecom NZ advertised an unlimited service and chose to keep the asterisk to themselves, when they tried to apply the hidden asterisk the government stepped in a mentioned some details about fair trading etc and now Telecom NZ are stuck supporting truly unlimited traffic for those fortunate enough to buy the unlimited plan for the brief time during which it was available.

    25. Re:FDC Servers by kyrio · · Score: 3, Informative

      You should be ashamed of yourself for giving out bad advice.

      Do NOT use FDC Servers. They are horrible. They are totally incompetent when it comes to keeping your VPS running. Your node will always be down and they will NOT notify you. Their staff is full of imbeciles. You will have to wait hours, if not days, for your server to come back up. They will have network connectivity issues for weeks and will not inform anyone. I don't think they even have a service outage/info page because it would be full of new updates of outages every day.

      The below providers are blacklisted, especially since most of them are incompetent resellers of another provider and their billing software license is expired (either that or they are super extremely incompetent). You will not get a refund from these fools after you realize that you can't access your servers for no reason other than their links are broken because they are idiots. Of course, because their billing software is broken, or they are so totally useless as humans, if you pay with PayPal you will be able to put in a dispute and the idiots won't even reply. Probably because their mail servers are broken, or maybe they lost their passwords and are too stupid to figure out how to reset them.

      DO NOT USE THESE PROVIDERS:
      ChimeHost
      ServerAxis
      FDCServers
      Profuse Solutions brands

      There are more that I went through, but I can't remember them all.

    26. Re:FDC Servers by kyrio · · Score: 1
    27. Re:FDC Servers by glitch0 · · Score: 1

      Oh absolutely, but if there's limits, then I'd like to know them so that I can make sure to not exceed them. Instead, they say Unlimited* and I have no idea how much bandwidth I can REALLY use.

      --
      -Glitch "We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds." - Linus Torvalds
    28. Re:FDC Servers by glitch0 · · Score: 1

      I wish the US govt had balls like that

      --
      -Glitch "We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds." - Linus Torvalds
    29. Re:FDC Servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Idiotic. Asking for recommendations and warnings in a section meant specifically for that is one way you "shop around". Nobody has all the answers and asking for input from a somewhat-targeted crowd like /. isn't lazy hand-holding. It's a modicum of diligence. Furthermore, you have no reason to assume this forum is the only source of information the op is using in comparisons.

      And I'm not sure where the government conspiracy / public school rant fits in, but that sounds like a personal issue you should probably see to, posthaste. That kind of angry, judgmental paranoia isn't healthy.

    30. Re:FDC Servers by InterestingFella · · Score: 1

      Such accusation isn't new on Slashdot. It's a bit better than accussing for working for Microsoft, I guess. I don't work for FDC, but I host my servers with them.

    31. Re:FDC Servers by hippie-joel · · Score: 1

      While it's nice that FDC offers unlimited bandwidth and does have very responsive support, back when I had a dedicated server with them I never had any luck pushing the connection above 2-3Mbps when I was paying for 100Mbps. Since moved to SoftLayer, haven't looked back since.

    32. Re:FDC Servers by duguk · · Score: 1

      Another vote for Linode here. Their customer service is astounding! If you're looking for something cheap and crap, but with a lot more space - then Kimsufi do great deals too; but it is via OVH.

    33. Re:FDC Servers by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 1

      Then just tell what websites you're hosting with them...

    34. Re:FDC Servers by allo · · Score: 1

      > 1000 GB Bandwidth
      Bandwith is measured in MB(it)/s, not in GB/MB

    35. Re:FDC Servers by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Telecom NZ are stuck supporting truly unlimited traffic

      For how long, though? Aren't typical contracts one year or so? After that, they just have to present new terms on a take-it-or-leave-it basis.

    36. Re:FDC Servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Their VPS plans start at $9/month which is hard to beat."

      No. It's easy to beat.

      I have a VPS on 2host that costs me less than $3 a month.

      lowendbox.com regularly posts deals from many different VPS's that are cheaper than $6 a month. If you are paying any more than $6 a month for a regular VPS, you're getting ripped.

    37. Re:FDC Servers by dringess · · Score: 1

      I've used ServerAxis for the last couple of years and everything's been great, so I'm not sure why you have them on your "black list".

    38. Re:FDC Servers by kyrio · · Score: 1

      Simple: I've never dealt with any other companies where I have paid an invoice and their system doesn't register it. Ever. ChimeHost and ServerAxis both had that problem. I tried them one after another. Their tech support is also identical. Retarded. They sound like outsourced Indian tech support that answer the phone (or emails) for multiple businesses in unrelated industries and just give out the stock replies they've been told to give.

      I'm actually fairly certain that I tried to use Burst.NET as well and, although they weren't as bad as the above two, they were still useless in that they had broken install images, bad networking and generally crappy prices for the quality of their service.

      If we come back to ChimeHost and ServerAxis in regards to price, they are infinitely way overpriced considering that they are shitty resellers of other shitty companies. If their tech support really isn't outsourced, it just goes to show how bad their real employees are.

      I would go so far as to suggest using FDC Servers over any of the others I've mentioned in these two posts.

    39. Re:FDC Servers by kyrio · · Score: 2

      He's not interested in who has their sites up, because they all should. He's interested in who is going to keep them up.

      If every site that he's encountered as being "suspended" was using HostGator, that means he can't trust them to keep a site up. If he had seen other hosts with the same problem, especially if there were as many from other hosts, he wouldn't have found HostGator's suspended sites as peculiar.

  2. lowendbox.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Here you go champ, lowendbox.com

    1. Re:lowendbox.com by mitgib · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here you go champ, lowendbox.com

      This is the best advise we'll see for a low cost VPS, as well as the discussion on http://lowendtalk.com/ This pair of sites is devoted to VPS priced $7 per month or less, and filled with mostly candid answers by actual users. Some of the popular, and regarded better KVM providers you will find on these sites are

      buyvm.net
      tinykvm.net
      ramhost.us
      hostigation.com
      bitcable.com

      * Disclaimer - I am the owner of hostigation.com

      --
      Being a spelling & grammar Nazi is a sign you do not poses the intelligence to contribute to the conversation
    2. Re:lowendbox.com by gregthebunny · · Score: 2

      A great host I found on lowendbox was RAM Host. I got a 128 MB/10 GB VPS for $15/year. That's per YEAR!

    3. Re:lowendbox.com by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 1

      That's my company, but since you're also doing some self-advertizing ... you might also wana add gplhost.com. :)

    4. Re:lowendbox.com by David+Greene · · Score: 1

      Thanks, pal. Already knew about that. I was trying to get some real user perspectives. lowendbox.com is pretty tough to navigate to find actual up-to-date user reviews.

      --

    5. Re:lowendbox.com by kyrio · · Score: 1

      Wow, they are nearly completely sold out of KVM servers. I might have to get one of their few UK servers that they have left.

    6. Re:lowendbox.com by allo · · Score: 1

      yourvz is having another offer like this. but their webinterface is broken and they are still fixing it ... so you get what you pay for.

    7. Re:lowendbox.com by maxexcloo · · Score: 1

      I have to put in a shoutout in for Tim (mitgib), he does an excellent job and the service he offers is second to none!
      Relevant review: http://www.96mb.com/96mb-low-end-vps-review-part-xiv-hostigation/
      Current Offer: (128 MB KVM @ $20/year) http://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/928/hostigation-xmas-special-2011-get-it-while-it-lasts-will-not-be-seen-again/

      Note: I'm not a spammer or anything, just an extremely satisfied customer ;)

    8. Re:lowendbox.com by h00manist · · Score: 1

      It already costs nearly nothing. Discount?

      --
      Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/
  3. Linode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Been very happy with Linode and PV-GRUB (PV-GRUB allows Xen guests to boot their own custom kernel)

    http://www.linode.com/
    http://www.linode.com/wiki/index.php/PV-GRUB

    for 20$ per month
    RAM 512MB
    Storage 20GB
    Transfer 200GB

    1. Re:linode by Temkin · · Score: 1

      Another vote for Linode. I've been with them for years. Highly recommended.

      Temkin

    2. Re:linode by jmc · · Score: 1

      Another vote for Linode. I have a Linode 512 for my personal sites, and I run an 8GB for my employer. Both have been humming along without issue for close to a year now.

      I spent almost a week obsessively researching VPS providers before choosing Linode, and really nobody could come close to them in terms of price and positive word of mouth.

    3. Re:linode by scurker · · Score: 1

      I recently switched to Linode about 3 months ago, although I've been lazily setting everything up so I haven't gotten the full experience. But what I have seen so far has been excellent. Plans starting at $20, you get to pick your server and distro (or do everything custom yourself). What's not to like?

    4. Re:linode by Sepultura · · Score: 1

      I'll add to the dozens already recommending Linode. As the parent says they don't over-sell their service, unlike most fly-by-night $5 operations. They're reliable, and they've been around for a long time and likely will continue.

      Plus, they really go out of their way to help their customers. A year or so ago they upgraded the memory allotment of all their packages (including the low end ones) by more than 40% for free. They let you switch plans on the fly, or add extras (like increased bandwidth, or specs, as req'd) for modest fees. They don't screw you over with overage costs. Plus they don't try to sell you service that you don't need. When I was first shopping around for a few sites I wanted to host they recommended the base plan and said "see if you need more - if you do you can always add on". I really appreciated that (and I didn't need extra for quite a while!)

      Plus their linode library is kept pretty up to date and is filled with info on just about all the topics you'll need on setup and managing of your system. I referenced it the other day when setting up mod_security on a new Debian install and it was perfect.

    5. Re:linode by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      linode is by far the best, it is not even close.

      They don't over-sell (far from it!), the service is great, uptime is nearly perfect, excellent tools like remote shell over https.

      <AOL>Me too!</AOL>
      I've tried a variety of them, Linode is pretty much the one. They're not the cheapest, but the service works properly and reliably and there are actual staff providing support.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    6. Re:Linode by mlts · · Score: 1

      Yet another vote for Linode here. Especially when I need to spin up a server while I'm out for a weekend so I can VPN in and check E-mail because the remote hotel or whatnot has "free" Wi-Fi, but inserts ads, Phorm style into what one browses.

    7. Re:linode by Rennt · · Score: 1

      Yep. Tried a few "cheaper" options but had no end of problems before moving to Linode. Solid, professional outfit.

    8. Re:linode by SIGBUS · · Score: 1

      I've been a happy customer since 2003 - Linode was literally a day old (at least for public availability) when I first got a VPS from them. Over the years, CPU, RAM, disk capacity, and data transfer have steadily increased, for no extra charge, and the service has been rock-solid.

      --
      Oh, no! You have walked into the slavering fangs of a lurking grue!
    9. Re:linode by wik · · Score: 4, Informative

      And yet another plug for Linode. I have been with them for over four years. Their infrastructure staff knows what they're doing (tech support has responded in 3 minutes on a Sunday night!) and they're hands-off with respect to how you want to run your box. Disk space is a little expensive, but it's not oversubscribed. Even the smallest accounts are well worth the money.

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
    10. Re:linode by Netlurker · · Score: 1

      Another recommendation for Linode.

    11. Re:Linode by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately Linode bills for the whole month and refunds you the proration, so you're still stuck with that amount as credit. If you have a full-time VM running and spin one up for a little bit this is fine, but if I really need something short-term I just use EC2 due to hourly billing.

    12. Re:linode by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Yet another vote for Linode. Good pricing, great service.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    13. Re:Linode by smed · · Score: 5, Informative

      I too have been very happy with Linode.
      Currently I manage about a dozen Linodes for various clients and the performance and support have exceeded my expectations by a long-shot.
      On occasion when there was a minor problem, Linode support staff contacted me quickly with instructions and pointers to documentation for handling the issues.
      Performance is much better than what you might expect by using the memory/disk-space metrics for each server plan.
      Linode support is excellent. The Linode Library has the best documentation, they have how-to docs for most common projects and they are updated regularly and the commentary is also very helpful. And dont forget the forums - if you're having an issue or need to figure out how to do something - most likely someone has written about it in the forums. You can extract some very valuable information for troubleshooting and project planning in the forums.
      And last but not least - the IRC channel is staffed by Linode support personnel and lots of really helpful volunteers. The community is awesome and friendly and helpful to-boot.
      Linode's got my vote and my continued business.

    14. Re:Linode by cshake · · Score: 1

      Another vote here for Linode - I've been running web services on a node for almost 2 years now and all sorts of background stuff that uses the bandwidth that isn't needed by httpd. Currently have a murmur server running on it for game voip as well. I don't use PV-GRUB because the Archlinux-paravirt kernel that they officially support is exactly what I want.

      Over the course of those 2 years I have only had one downtime, and that was because the machine I was on was scheduled for maintenance - they sent me 2 weeks notice and I was able to shut down and transfer the VPS over to the new physical machine when it was good for me any time in that window.

      I will say that I've told friends about it and they scoff at the price, but I've yet to find a better price from a reliable host that gives you exactly what they specify with no added restrictions or hidden things. There are links in various places as you're maintaining the node from their web interface like "backup" and "add more resources" that bring you to the extras page where you can pay for them, but I'd expect nothing less and that's the grand total of "ads" that you see anywhere.

    15. Re:Linode by jis5 · · Score: 1

      Another vote for Linode from me. I have been using them for years. I send mail from my linode and haven't had a problem with being on anyone's spam list.

    16. Re:Linode by ustolemyname · · Score: 1

      Another Linode vote. Pick your own distro, good tools, solid service.

    17. Re:Linode by Pirow · · Score: 1

      Another vote for Linode.

      They're the only VPS provider I've used so I'm not sure how they compare, but I'm using their basic package for $20 / month and I haven't had any problems and there seems to be a great community based around them so support isn't really an issue.

    18. Re:linode by micheas · · Score: 1

      I moved most of my linodes from freemont (he.net) to dallas over those instances.

      From what I could understand HE.net had some bad UPSes that they were sold and replaced them with ones from another vendor.

      Overall, the disk access thoughput has been pretty good, network connectivity OK.

      One thing is that the "private network is not really private, and you don't get real private network connecting your vms.

      The price is about $80 a month for 2GB of ram, which seems to be about the going rate.

      The HE.net disaster could have been handled a little better, but once I found out that it was a problem with HE.net I found HE.net's reporting of the disaster pretty good, With ETA's and live status feeds, which if you are reselling or managing the server professionally makes it seem like you are on top of the situation.

    19. Re:Linode by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Linode is great. They are a little pricier, but worth it: excellent support, and uptime is the best I've seen.

    20. Re:Linode by jlgreer1 · · Score: 1

      Another vote for Linode. I have been with them for years. Linode's service and suport are excellent.

    21. Re:Linode by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      You've got quite a bit more going on than I do. I've seen folks recommend Prgmr.com too. Though I'll be honest, that one looks a bit hobby-ish. Perhaps good for a personal blog, but I'll probably stick with Linode for the revenue-generating stuff.

    22. Re:Linode by Genocaust · · Score: 1

      I've been very happy with service at prgmr.com for the year or so I've been there. Only two minor issues; both were hardware faults (so fairly unavoidable -- service was restored quickly though). Support is at the "$5/month" rate as stated on their site. They're very knowledgeable, and will help, but yes it is only a handful of guys and they may take some time to respond to tickets on anything that isn't "host machine 100% down".

      --
      It could be that the only purpose of your life is to serve as a warning to others.
  4. linode by Aighearach · · Score: 5, Informative

    linode is by far the best, it is not even close.

    They don't over-sell (far from it!), the service is great, uptime is nearly perfect, excellent tools like remote shell over https.

  5. linode by Maglos · · Score: 4, Informative

    I tried a cheap $5/month vps for a while, it was trouble. First they falsely claimed that I was maxing out my transfer limit and I switched to linode after a bunch of os files became corrupted. I haven't had an issue with linode and a few of my friends use them. Also 128mb a bit inconvenient for most things(watch out for orphaned ssh sessions chewing up ram at 5mb each).

  6. Prgmr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Prgmr has been the only vps I've used for a very long time now. Very inexpensive and they get out of your way.

    1. Re:Prgmr by makomk · · Score: 1

      I used to use prgmr in its previous (first?) incarnation a few years ago and it just worked. Unusual management system though; instead of having a web-based control panel you gave them a SSH public key when you signed up and it allowed you to SSH in and get a management menu. (Apparently they've since added a way to boot up your VPS from a rescue image too.) Was a shame they closed down back then.

    2. Re:Prgmr by Ambsace · · Score: 1

      I've been using them for the last 2 months. It has been working well, but don't expect any support or automation. It's a great way to get your hands dirty and you can get a phenomenal amount of RAM for a very affordable price.

    3. Re:Prgmr by MrLizardo · · Score: 1

      Another +1 from me. I've hosted a couple websites with them and also run a (small, private) minecraft server there as well. Their IRC channel has a lot of very smart, funny people, many of them who work for prgmr. Actually, if you hang out on the IRC channel you get to see the inner workings of the business as well. If you're going to be running a bunch of VMs though, Linode or Rackspace both have nice web-based management consoles. But for a "personal" VPS it's hard to recommend prgmr highly enough.

      --
      ^I'm with stupid.^
  7. Comcast Business Class by dburkland · · Score: 2, Informative

    For $59 a month I get Comcast's Business Class service (12 down/2up) along with 5 static IPs which I use to host things like mail off a personal server. I've been using their service for almost 3 years now without much issue (the support also is a lot better which is worth it in case you do run into any hiccups). I'm in the Twin Cities area and am pretty sure this service is available to much of the metro area so you may want to give them a call.

    1. Re:Comcast Business Class by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      I used to do this, except with Charter Business when I lived in St. Cloud. It works, and it's kinda nice having your own server right there, but for the same cost you can get much better bandwidth to a server hosted in a professional hosting center, and a lot of nice services to boot, and frankly after a while the novelty of hosting my own servers in my own home wore off and it became more of a hassle that I could live without. I was reluctant to move all my essential stuff to some server I'll never even see, but I couldn't be happier now. I'd never go back to self-hosting.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    2. Re:Comcast Business Class by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      While I do run my own server (and I've done so for many years) I am currently migrating away from this solution (even though I have a 100/100 Mbps connection).

      Why? You're in charge of everything. Just this week the server PSU decided to suddenly fail at four in the morning. Luckily I had another PSU that I wasn't using. But, I still had to swap the hardware out. Backups? I have to deal with those as well. Connection goes down? I have to call the ISP. Cat chews on the network cable? I have to deal with that...

      So, I'm currently migrating my external services (mail and www) to Linode. It doesn't matter if my file server is down for a few hours or I can't use my local DNS cache because something got fried but it sucks if mail goes down or my websites are unreachable because something broke and I can't fix it.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    3. Re:Comcast Business Class by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      That's pretty cheap, but isn't 2Mbps of upload bandwidth a little thin for most VPS applications? Pretty much rules out anything you normally wouldn't do on a local machine anyway, doesn't it?

  8. Linode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    www.linode.com Linode is the best VPS provider far and above anyone and for a really decent price. You have full access to your system, you can use pv-grub to load your own OS or just use one of the many they have available. There is absolutely no other VPS provider even remotely close to the level of quality or service that Linode provides.

  9. Slicehost? by CyberVenom · · Score: 1

    Slicehost has been great for me in the past, though now that RackSpace is absorbing their infrastructure, I'm not sure what they will be like in the future.

    1. Re:Slicehost? by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      I liked Slicehost. They were pretty responsive and the service was good. They were even pretty competitive for a while. I've since moved to Linode... lots more options and you get more for your dollar. They're very comparable really... both know what they're doing and aren't fly-by-night operations.

    2. Re:Slicehost? by Guspaz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Slicehost doesn't exist anymore; Rackspace bought them, let the service languish without improvements (while competitors continued to improve), and then killed it off by forcing customers to migrate to Rackspace's way more expensive services.

      My understanding is that many Slicehost customers migrated to Linode, since it was always the closest competitor anyhow.

    3. Re:Slicehost? by CyberVenom · · Score: 1

      That's partially true. I am still hosted on RackSpace's "Slicehost" farm and under the "Slicehost" billing plan for the moment, but they will be forcibly converting my VM to their RackSpace farm in January. Of course, since the original question was in regard to creating a new VPS, you're right, Slicehost doesn't exist anymore for new customers.
      They sent out a survey a month or so ago asking for thoughts on the RackSpace conversion, and in my response I raised the concern that the newer RackSpace plans would be more expensive (even though they tried to downplay that in the press releases), but I get the feeling the survey was motivated more as a PR stunt than out of any sort of genuine concern for the customers' opinions.

  10. Try IntoVPS - using them for over a year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Try IntoVPS (www.intovps.com) - it goes as cheap as 10$ / month for unmanaged VPS (yes, you have root access).

  11. Linode.com by jeffbeadles · · Score: 2

    I've had a vm at Linode for several years now, and couldn't be happier.

    Full root access with oob-console access, choice of distros, and the ability to do anything legal that you want.

      -Jeff

    1. Re:Linode.com by tiffany352 · · Score: 1

      What kind of screwed up VPS provider wouldn't give you root access?

    2. Re:Linode.com by Skapare · · Score: 1

      The concept of managed hosting means THEY keep root and take care of it for you. They want you to not use root so they don't have to ponder what you broke. This is a class of service appropriate for those that tend to break things when logged in as root. For those of us that can handle root properly, we want UNmanaged hosting. They just set it up enough for us to login as root (or for more fun, login as a user and crack into root) and do our own setup. I think your observation may be that managed services are rare in a VPS context (more common for a dedicated machine and up). For the kind of price of VPS, managing for people doesn't really seem to be a viable business model. But I have seen managed VPS services offered somewhere (but that was a few years ago when I was first hunting around for dedicated service).

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  12. Enzu by tiffany352 · · Score: 1

    I've been with them for several months now. Their Romania datacentre sucks, don't use it. But their US datacentres are very nice. I have a vps for $20/month with 1gb of ram, 2gb burstable; 2ghz single-core CPU, burstable to more cores; 40gb HDD, 1tb transfer. I usually get around 8 megabytes per second through their network and the Dallas datacentre has yet to go below what it promises. I run a minecraft server, IRC server, and several other things on my vps 24/7.

  13. hub.org by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

    I personally prefer www.hub.org.
    A) You get a FreeBSD VPS (jail'ed)
    B) Support the host that hosts PostgreSQL
    C) In addition you get access to a number of shared PostgreSQL versions and a number of MySQL's. So you don't spend your RAM or disk space on your DB. Quite convenient for smaller needs.

    1. Re:hub.org by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      PS: My own country's http://www.dedikuoti.lt/ is really low cost for what they provide. But.... You essentially have to know Lithuania, as they don't have an English version of their site.

  14. Cheap can also mean insecure! by DaHat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Recently I discovered that a low cost (semi well known) Shared host I use actually stores passwords (ie login to portal, sql, etc) in a form which can be easily converted to clear text... hell, they even have multiple Show Password links and require you to share said password with them to receive tech support... so they can verify it against the clear text password they see.

    I've since been on the hunt for a new host... however have discovered that the treatment of passwords in this manor is not uncommon. Hell, last night I canceled a VPS account less than an hour after signing up as I discovered that not only does the admin exhibit editorial control over passwords (he changed my initial one), but that he too stores them in clear text.

    Granted... if you are smart you will use a different password per account/service... however when such a company treats accounts in such a way I can do nothing but run.

    1. Re:Cheap can also mean insecure! by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      This information would be more helpful if you provided the hosting company name. There *might* be a few people here who would be interested in avoiding such a provider...

    2. Re:Cheap can also mean insecure! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Names should be named.

      If you are concerned about slander charges, you can use a high-end cryptography like ROT13 so that only uberleet (sorry, "uber133t" ?) haxors can haz decode it. (Have I got the right decade of English?)

      Behind such secure communication channels, the insecure hosting providers will have no way of knowing who is talking about them. [/sarcasm]

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  15. A2 Hosting by EricTheGreen · · Score: 1

    Have used them for a variety of shared and VPS deployments over the past decade. Reasonably priced, root shell access, responsive support. Only thing they don't offer is KVM, but they offer most of the standard distros in barebone images, which you can then customize as you wish. They've worked well for me.

    1. Re:A2 Hosting by datapharmer · · Score: 1

      I can second A2. They are great for a low cost solution.

      --
      Get a web developer
  16. TDRevolution by Jon.Laslow · · Score: 1

    They're inexpensive and I haven't had any downtime aside from scheduled maintenance. Plus, it's run by a group of Android developers (more commonly known as Team Douche, hence the name). http://tdrevolution.com/

  17. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  18. KickAss VPS by zraider · · Score: 2

    I'm in the Twin Cities too. Check out KickAss VPS. They're served out of the Verispace colo center in Edina. I pay $25/month for an Ubuntu server with root access. Never had any problems.

  19. Linode is the way to go by DemianJ · · Score: 1

    I use a Linode 512 to do web development, run automated tasks (Twitter updates, website production), and keep current on new technologies. It has hosted application servers including Openfire XMPP, NGINX, Redmine, and I'd read of others hosting Asterix and many others. Its a server that doesn't go down due to local power or internet outages. Although the Linode team provides top notch support, I really haven't had to use it. The tools are great and the service just works!

  20. Serveraxis by Huogo · · Score: 2

    I've been with ServerAxis since November 2006 and they have been rock solid. Currently, for my very small hosting needs, I'm paying $9/mo for 512 MB RAM and a 16 GB SSD HD with 500 GB/month bandwidth. Full root access is included, but you have to install the OS off of one of their base images, with the options being CentOS, Debian, Gentoo and Ubuntu.

  21. Try RimuHosting by freman · · Score: 2

    I'm not currently a customer, but I've watched them for a while (friends with one of their staff, full disclosure) and will be going to them when I need to move off my DSL.

    Not the cheapest but they do offer a discount for open source developers

    http://rimuhosting.com/order/startorder1.jsp

    I'm not even getting a discount to plug them ;)

  22. You're not making sense by suso · · Score: 2

    "good, inexpensive"

    Those are two parts of the triangle. If you also want it to have it fast, then you're simply being unreasonable. You're probably also one of the people complaining about GoDaddy supporting SOPA. Don't you see that these are all related? Find a hosting provider that knows what they are doing, reliable and pay a little more for it. Don't complain when your server costs more than your dinner.

  23. I can tell you who NOT to use by theillien · · Score: 1

    Carpathia Hosting. Worst I've ever dealt with. Not to mention the fact that I worked there and even told customers they should consider looking elsewhere for better service. I tried to stay away from the VPS customers, but unfortunately the company seemed to think that a sys admin was the same as customer support.

  24. Dreamhost by ender- · · Score: 4, Informative

    I haven't used their VPS but you can look into Dreamhost. I've been very happy with my shared web account.

    For what it's worth, I used to think I needed a VPS as well. Then I found myself with limited funds for awhile so I transferred my site to Dreamhost on their shared hosting plan. At the time they had a deal that it was around $48 to pre-pay for 2 years. It averages out to about $1.95/month. In addition to the unlimited domains/disk/bandwidth and mysql database, the account comes with 1 free domain registration, easy setup to have email hosted either through Dreamhost themselves or through Google Apps [which I do]. And it comes with a shell account, which is on the webserver itself running Debian. They have all kinds of one-click installs for various blogs and ecommerce options and whatnot.
    As for stuff like git, I'm not sure. I see that there are some git commands on the server, but I don't know if it's possible to run a git server.

    At first I thought I would hate it, and would be transferring back to a VPS/Dedicated server first chance I got. Well, it's been 2.5 years now and I have no desire to switch back. I haven't really missed having root access, and it's nice not to have to worry so much about managing everything. Admittedly, this is just personal sites of fairly low importance, but I've been happy with the setup so far. And they don't seem to mind me sitting on irssi on the shell account all day. The only thing it does is it will automatically kill any single process which has been running for a week.

    Anyway, it's worth a look and if you don't like it, I think they have a relatively painless process to transfer to a VPS.

    As an added bonus, they've been against SOPA since November, according to their official blog.

    1. Re:Dreamhost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've been a Dreamhost customer for eight years. They're great 98% of the time. It's the other 2% of the time, when their entire data center goes to hell or they accidentally bill everyone for a years' worth of service, that makes me wonder what kind of drugs the folks who work there are smoking while on the clock.

    2. Re:Dreamhost by Michael+Meissner · · Score: 1

      I've been a dreamhost customer for about 6 years now (shared web server though, not VPS), and I've been very happy with them. One of the reasons I went with them originally was I could update my web site with ssh instead of having to use FTP. I use their host as a CVS server (through SSH), and I remember you could also set it up as a SVN server (maybe GIT by now).

    3. Re:Dreamhost by kyrio · · Score: 1

      They handle a shit load over there at DreamHost. They have California government contracts, as a simple example. Their service is superb for their shared hosting. You don't put an important site on it, is all. They have had huge issues in the past but as far as I can tell, the last couple of years haven't had anything big. The biggest problem they have right now (actually, it's always been a problem) is other users running bullshit and killing your server for however long it's running. When something goes wrong at DH, you MUST put in a ticket as soon as you notice. You might not get an instant response, but you also get a discount on your next rebill for the amount of time the ticket lasted), and you might be getting them informed of the issue before they would have normally noticed it.

    4. Re:Dreamhost by kyrio · · Score: 1

      DreamHost VPS is not a good deal. You must have a regular account with them ($9/m?) and then you are paying on top of that for the VPS. It gets expensive - especially since, at least back when they first released it, their VPS needed 2GB RAM to run Apache with no load. It was essentially unusable unless you were running lighttpd and rebooted it every so often. They may have fixed those issues in the last couple of years, but they are still way overpriced compared to hosts that won't go down every so often.

      Now, when it comes to using DH shared services you are getting what you pay for. They are totally managed and highly customized. Even being as managed as they are, you can still connect with SSH or FTP (if you don't disable FTP) and do pretty much anything that doesn't require root access. The downside, of course, is that they do have issues with downtime and other users running scripts that kill your server until DH staff notices. Their unlimited* service is also as unlimited as it says. Outside of abuse issues, such as using it as a file host for your warez, or running a script that uses 90% CPU constantly, you can use it as you wish.

      I should also mention that they do things by the book. Babbies sending them emails about their copyrighted pictures being on your website get ignored without a DMCA notice. If they do get a DMCA notice, they will properly contact you to handle the issue.

      DH are good guys in the business.

    5. Re:Dreamhost by archen · · Score: 1

      That's about what I've experienced with dreamhost. Great the vast majority of the time, but with a few rare collosal screwups. Notably the company where I work has a website hosted with them, and had our dns records pointed to some porn site because they failed to update bind. (don't get me started on how they manage their dns over there). I also think the way they handle email is completely fubar and switched mail handling to google.

      But they do offer an outstanding amount of freedom for a shared account. I certainly couldn't go back to a host that didn't offer full shell access. I've been with them over 12 years now and I haven't moved off, so I'm satisfied their service.

    6. Re:Dreamhost by Genocaust · · Score: 1

      I'm glad someone had a good DH VPS experience. I've had many sites hosted on their shared hosting for years with near zero issues. My VPS with them was a NIGHTMARE.

      Things were gravy to start, but after a few months everything I ran on the VPS suffered large random latency spikes. Even my terminal sessions would hang. Between my own investigating and many support tickets it was noted there was one use on the host machine hammering the disk/CPU. So they moved me to a newer (faster) server and dealt with their problem customer. Except they didn't move me during the window I provided to them (and that they agreed to); and when they DID move me they moved me to a box that was "oh, sorry, our mistake, it wasn't ready for live customers yet" and was WORSE than the one I came off of. So then I was (again, outside my agreed window of "please fix my stuff during these hours") moved to a third box -- which still sucked. That was enough to drop their VPS service after the good two weeks it took me to convince them that it was NOT my own processes "having low RAM" and getting a free bump to max RAM to prove it.

      I've been with prgmr.com ever since and never been happier.

      --
      It could be that the only purpose of your life is to serve as a warning to others.
  25. Linode FTW by Mister+Mudge · · Score: 1

    I've been using Linode for a little over a year. I'm using it to run about a dozen instances of the Drupal CMS, plus Tomcat, Solr, and a few other utility-type services.

    100% uptime since I signed up.

    Here's my "uptime" stats as of about 1 minute ago:
            01:07:13 up 416 days, 23:06, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00

    --
    Mudge

    In theory, theory and practice are the same.
    In practice, they're not.

    1. Re:Linode FTW by SIGBUS · · Score: 2

      One thing to note, though, is that Linode will sometimes hand out extras - and if it's disk space or RAM, you'll need to reboot to take advantage of it. :)

      --
      Oh, no! You have walked into the slavering fangs of a lurking grue!
    2. Re:Linode FTW by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      There are ways to upgrade a kernel on the fly... Not that I do that, since I never get into uptime dick size competitions, but it is done.

    3. Re:Linode FTW by kyrio · · Score: 1

      If you want a good link and servers that won't blow up with your data, you pay. Linode is expensive, but you can trust it with your important data. I can only assume that your data is not important at all.

  26. You're asking in the wrong place by afabbro · · Score: 5, Informative

    You should be asking on WHT, which is the best-known forum for discussing web hosting, VPS, and dedicated servers.

    I would echo the linode suggestion, particularly if it's the first VPS you've ever used. However, they are not KVM. If you want KVM, try 6sync. Another fine choice is BuyVM, though you have to wait until they have stock, which is a minor media event.

    I would ignore the suggestions to look at lowendbox, unless you are willing to trade price for stability (which is not always a bad tradeoff, just be sure to do it consciously)

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
    1. Re:You're asking in the wrong place by mitgib · · Score: 1

      I would ignore the suggestions to look at lowendbox, unless you are willing to trade price for stability (which is not always a bad tradeoff, just be sure to do it consciously)

      How can you say this and feature a LEB staple on the page in your sig?

      --
      Being a spelling & grammar Nazi is a sign you do not poses the intelligence to contribute to the conversation
    2. Re:You're asking in the wrong place by afabbro · · Score: 1

      I would ignore the suggestions to look at lowendbox, unless you are willing to trade price for stability (which is not always a bad tradeoff, just be sure to do it consciously)

      How can you say this and feature a LEB staple on the page in your sig?

      BuyVM is a budget provider, and are labeled so on my page in the Budget section. It's not that LEBs are bad, it's just that someone who's never used a VPS before could walk onto LEB/LET and pick a provider and many providers there are not good. If someone is going to use a LEB, they should go into it eyes open.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    3. Re:You're asking in the wrong place by phinlyn · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the comment about WHT. They're a great resource for anyone who is interested in learning more about the hosting industry and wants to get some insight into how things work.

  27. OVH Networks by NSN+A392-99-964-5927 · · Score: 1

    OVH Networks is the best unless you are in London and can use the LinX network. I know because I am called up in the middle of the night to fix issues for British Telecom Tier 4 and know all the exchanges in the UK and main hubs.

    OVH is your bitch! Merry Christmas :)

    --
    All cows eat grass!
  28. Danger, Will Robinson by Zocalo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I guess you don't use them for outbound email since FDC Servers has a terrible reputation for hosting spammers and having a completely non-responsive abuse department. There are more than a few members of anti-spam lists that advocate a block on sight policy for SMTP as far as FDC are concerned, and I know some that kill them for web as well due to hosted malware.

    Of course, that may or may not be an issue for a given individual since it depends on what you want the server for, but I'd strongly recommend a few search queries for "$provider" in connection with "abuse", "spam" and "malware", etc. If they have an entry on Spamhaus, or lots of IPs listed in DNSBLs or URIBLs, then that's generally a bad sign too.

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    1. Re:Danger, Will Robinson by Skal+Tura · · Score: 1

      their abuse dept is far from non-responsive --- except when you need to have to get them raise an machine back online which they took down on Friday afternoon, so earliest it could be brought up is monday morning.

    2. Re:Danger, Will Robinson by dan2550 · · Score: 1

      I just moved to FDC (for colo, not vps) and they have been really fast in the tickets I've opened. I'm a little disappointed that they don't offer *any* DoS mitigation, but even on weekends they are really quick to respond. They even gave me the numbe for their NOC so I can call them directly if I need a reboot.

    3. Re:Danger, Will Robinson by hardwarefreak · · Score: 1

      I guess you don't use them for outbound email since FDC Servers has a terrible reputation for hosting spammers and having a completely non-responsive abuse department. There are more than a few members of anti-spam lists that advocate a block on sight policy for SMTP as far as FDC are concerned...

      Apparenly you've read some of my list posts. Yes, FDC Servers has a bad rep for hosting snowshoe spammers. In all fairness to FDC, all providers of ultra cheap VPS/hosting/cloud/colo servers are snowshoe spammer magnets preceisely because of the low cost. And as a consequence of low margins, they most often can't afford to staff real abuse departments. Which is why many mail operators simply SMTP ban the entire address space of these outfits, often at the edge firewall to keep the traffic off the MTAs.

      It simply became too time consuming, long ago, to play whack-a-mole in an attempt to let though the few legit senders on these networks. Other providers in the same general category: Steadfast, iWeb, Hurricane Electric, Turnkey Internet, Sharktech, Softlayer, Reliance Globalcom, Syptec, ColoGuys, Colo4, Singlehop, Liquidweb, AccelerateBiz, Limestone, Staminus, Layered Tech, Eonix, 1&1 Internet, Hostnoc, VPLS, Digital Connexxions, Corporate Colocation, Versaweb, FortressITX, Suavemente. Those are just ones on my radar, and I run a pretty small receiving operation.

      If one desires to rent a server/VPS with the intent to send email from it, I'd steer clear of the above networks. Rackspace would be a better choice as their abuse dept seems to do a good job of keeping the house fairly clean and has a much better rep WRT spam emission. Softlayer and Limestone actually have good abuse desk managers. I see them booting snowshoe spammers off their networks almost daily. But it seems they simply can't keep up with the rate at which their sales forces are signing up new snowshoe spammers--poor or non-existent vetting process.

      Everyone wants cheap service, especially snowshoe spammers. Keep in mind that hosting cost has a direct impact on their bottom line, whereas this is less important for a guy who just needs one server and one IP for a personal setup. Thus, if you want to separate yourself from spammers, go to a provider that charges twice the average cheapo rate on the market. Odds are you won't have spammers in your midst, and thus you won't have problems with your mail being rejected.

    4. Re:Danger, Will Robinson by Trixter · · Score: 1

      I guess you don't use them for outbound email since FDC Servers has a terrible reputation for hosting spammers and having a completely non-responsive abuse department. There are more than a few members of anti-spam lists that advocate a block on sight policy for SMTP as far as FDC are concerned, and I know some that kill them for web as well due to hosted malware.

      I did not know this before signing up, and received a network block previously assigned to a spammer. It was "fun" getting myself off of all the anti-spam/DNSBL/RIBL/etc. etc. lists. It took about a week and was not very painful. The only holdout is AT&T/SBC -- once you're on their list, you don't get off of it. AT&T's abuse department is /dev/null, all requests go into a black hole.

      I have been very happy with FDC -- I joined because I wanted bandwidth that I didn't have to worry about overage charges for, and they have been true to their word on that aspect.

  29. Prgmr.com by nido · · Score: 4, Informative

    Prgmr.com owner Luke Crawford has some diary entries at k5 where he talks about his business...

    I've been happy customer of his for the past 2 years, so this comment is a vote for Luke.

    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
    1. Re:Prgmr.com by lvv · · Score: 1

      +1 for Prgmr. Stable, fast, reliable. I am 4yr with them.

    2. Re:Prgmr.com by Maglos · · Score: 1

      Thats good to hear, to bad I didn't find those guys a couple years ago.

  30. Colocation is expensive, don't expect much.... by bleomycin · · Score: 2

    The problem with all of these cheap VPS providers is that they almost all operate out of some of the worst data centers in the country. I don't mean to pick on linode in particular but last i checked their west coast facility was hurricane electric, fremont 2. That facility is single homed and known for being just about the cheapest colocation money can buy anywhere on the planet. If you're curious about some of the issues HE FM2 experiences take a look at this thread: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1058700 As you move up the ranks in facilities the costs rise dramatically, "cheap" VPS's are a huge DDOS risk as people purchase them for all sorts of nefarious reasons, so unless they operate their own networks the high end data centers won't touch them with a 10' pole. If http://asn.cymru.com/cgi-bin/whois.cgi and check who they use for transport via robtex: http://www.robtex.com/ The easiest rule to follow: if hurricane electric or cogent are in the mix run and don't look back!

    1. Re:Colocation is expensive, don't expect much.... by afabbro · · Score: 1

      I don't mean to pick on linode in particular but last i checked their west coast facility was hurricane electric, fremont 2.

      In their defense, they are in many datacenters. Also, I wouldn't say Linode is a "cheap VPS provider" - they're one of the pricier ones, particularly if you look at the bandwidth.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
  31. Webkeepers by fnj · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can't believe nobody has mentioned http://webkeepers.com/. You can get in for as little as $6.95 a month, and for $19.95 a month you get an unmatched 250GB of disk and 1GB of guaranteed RAM. They have been excellent for me.

    1. Re:Webkeepers by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      I use them; pretty good (aside from some minor initial issues that were resolved reasonably quickly).

    2. Re:Webkeepers by fnj · · Score: 1

      Not sure what I had to do on my Webkeepers CentOS5 VM, but it's using Plesk 9.3. I think at some point I told them Plesk didn't work right, and they told me something I had to do to update it.

  32. I live in the Twin Cities and can run servers by garcia · · Score: 1

    1. Continue to use DSL but get a new ISP. I was forced to use Frontier for the line but had Visi as my ISP and they allowed servers just fine--even reverse DNS.

    2. Move to business class cable service. I'm forced to use Charter (which has its share of problems) but most of the rest of the TC has Comcast (which apparently at Business Class isn't terrible). It's about $72/month for business class with one static IP. No reverse DNS on Charter but that's not much of an issue unless you still IRC. If you don't want/can't get either, check out Clearwire's business class (their uptime guarantees are lame as shit, something like 13 days/year are considered acceptable).

    4. I don't know much about VPS but thought I'd let you know there are options available even though you think there aren't.

    1. Re:I live in the Twin Cities and can run servers by garcia · · Score: 2

      Well, Comcast is way faster than that. What are you waiting for?

    2. Re:I live in the Twin Cities and can run servers by Jethro · · Score: 1

      Comcast Business will set up reverse DNS for you to match your server names. I needed this for my mail server. I was actually VERY pleasantly surprised when I called tech support - I was all geared up to explain what reverse DNS means so they can kick me up to the supervisor who can maybe figure out who to talk to, but the guy who answered the phone knew exactly what I wanted and was able to set it up in UNDER A MINUTE.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    3. Re:I live in the Twin Cities and can run servers by WankerWeasel · · Score: 1

      We did a decent amount of reverse DNS setup when I worked for Time Warner Business Class (which in the Minneapolis area became Comcast later on). At the time of the transition, the Minneapolis area Time Warner Business Class did more sales/service in one month than Comcast Business did nationwide in an entire year. The Comcast guys couldn't believe we provided fiber to the business to those that wanted it with some having 1000Mbit point to point connections or even 1000Mbit internet connections. With time Comcast has now learned and has expanded their business services.

  33. Linode by Guspaz · · Score: 1

    I've been with maybe a half dozen hosts over the past decade or so, from the biggest in the world to one of the smallest. Not one of them managed to come anywhere close to Linode in terms of reliability and quality of service. Yes, they're a premium provider (not in the business of massive overselling to offer super low prices for super high amounts of bandwidth), but at $20 a month for their entry level offering, the barrier to entry is not high.

    They've got six datacenters spread out over the world (leased space, obviously), run pretty high-performance boxes (dual quad-core xeons with low contention, 15K RPM SAS drives in RAID-10, etc), have a large degree of automation (so most requests happen instantly since no human has to intervene), support pvgrub for loading your own kernels if you want, have an active community on IRC (where most of their staff idle) and forums, offer more flexibility than even a dedicated server (management interface lets you do everything down to repartition your disk space and install random operating systems, if you want, although anything but Linux is unsupported, upgrading or resizing your VPS takes only the time to migrate it to another homogeneous host box), they use Xen (similar to KVM) for real virtualization, they provide out-of-band console access via a virtual serial port (ssh to the host box or use an ajax terminal), etc. I could keep listing features, but it's better to just visit their site and read up. I'll leave with another parting shot about their management interface (which has smartphone app versions too) being awesome.

  34. Re:ThrustVPS by toygeek · · Score: 1

    Yes, and they suck. BTDT. I just got a VPS at myhosting.com, so far so good. More costly, but you get what you pay for!

  35. Mosso - Rackspace's VPS by originalhack · · Score: 1

    You set up an account, then use their control panel to choose a base distribution and create VPS instances. You configure the machine and pay for only what you configure. You can create a machine, log in as root and manage it. If you try a machine and blow it away a few days later, you just pay for the days it was running.

    I've used them for several years and they are very reliable.

  36. Re:Couple of options and my experiences. by Guspaz · · Score: 1

    They didn't really have a clear idea what they were doing when hardware failed and because of that I don't feel comfortable recommending them.

    Considering that Linode's staff don't do work in the datacenters (they rely on remote hands & eyes), I'm not sure how you could get that impression.

  37. Re:AmeriNOC by Guspaz · · Score: 1

    Those kind of specs mean they're horrendously overselling. Anybody who uses that sort of service is asking for it.

  38. Amazon have a cheap server by Ragnar79 · · Score: 2

    $9 pr month for a Micro server if you reserve it for 1 year.

    Micro Instance 613 MB of memory, up to 2 ECUs (for short periodic bursts), EBS storage only, 32-bit or 64-bit platform
    http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/#pricing

    1. Re:Amazon have a cheap server by XaXXon · · Score: 1

      Free for micro for a year if you're new.

      http://aws.amazon.com/free/

      disclaimer: I work there.

  39. Amazon: The elephant in the room. by cskrat · · Score: 4, Informative

    Amazon micro EC2 instances are reasonably priced and I use one for my personal sandbox and mail server. Average price is $14.60 /month ($0.02/h * 24h * 365d / 12) for a no commitment a la carte and drops to an average of $8.82/mo or $6.43/mo with 1 or 3 year reservations https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/#pricing . They also have a free for the first year program at http://aws.amazon.com/free/ to get you started.

    You won't get KVM access for OS install but there are startup images for all the common free linux distros (Centos, Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu, etc.), Amazon Linux (a custom distro for EC2), and non-free OS's like RHEL and MS Windows (they cost more per hour). Every distro I've used on there gives you either direct root login or `sudo su -l` capability. You have full control over the incoming firewall rules so you can allow specific ports by IP or CIDR range without chewing up CPU or I/O in iptables. You can add additional storage on the fly (including via automated script within your VPS if you can program) and take live snapshots of running disks (including the OS disk) for backups.

    I use Amazon for my work systems and much prefer them to managing an on site rack or letting some other host charge us for the impediment to administration that is managed hosting.

    --
    My God! It's full of eval()'s.
    1. Re:Amazon: The elephant in the room. by MattW · · Score: 1

      As soon as you actually USE the machine, though, bandwidth and IO charges will drive that up to $25+ quite easily, however. I sometimes experiment with Amazon boxes, but I just spin them up using a popular aws perl toolkit, use them, spin them down. It's really easy to create them and interact with them via script, but I wouldn't want to use them regularly.

    2. Re:Amazon: The elephant in the room. by cskrat · · Score: 2

      I actually factored the heavy use (i.e. on 24/7) reservations of $62 and $100 for my reserved prices. The actual monthly fee is about $3.65 after you've committed to (i.e. paid for) a heavy use reservation. That's part of why I put the word "average" in front of those prices.

      --
      My God! It's full of eval()'s.
    3. Re:Amazon: The elephant in the room. by cskrat · · Score: 1

      I assumed that since he's moving from a 1.5Mbit residential connection and only mentioned running a personal website he's probably not pushing more than the 15GB free tier allowance per month.

      IO charges are tough to estimate but a micro running as a web/email server and not doing obscene amounts of disk thrashing should come in slightly cheaper than a typical gumball machine purchase per month. We have half a dozen internal services instances running databases, web servers, server monitoring and logging services in one region that used a whopping $2.16 in I/O last month. Our main region was a bit more but that's where we have servers that automatically spawn other servers depending on user load.

      --
      My God! It's full of eval()'s.
  40. Linode by DRichardHipp · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been running http://www.sqlite.org/ on Linode since 2004. They've been great. Highly recommended.

  41. interserver.net works for me by sglow · · Score: 1

    I've got a VPS running on interserver.net, and I'm happy with them. I'm not doing anything fancy, but do have a couple domains pointed at the server with simple static pages, and run my e-mail through them. I'm running Ubuntu on my vps which is one of their standard options.

  42. SSD Nodes by XERQ · · Score: 1

    I've been using SSD Nodes for my projects and they've been stellar, although they are a bit pricey compared to most low end providers. 12 network providers (8 tier 1), sandy bridge processors with SSDs and you can't go wrong.

  43. vServer Center Cloud VPS by vServer+Center · · Score: 1
    vServer Center currently offers 1GB RAM Cloud VPS for $9.95/month lifetime (Coupon: FRMVDSKV20).
    URL: http://www.vservercenter.com/cloud-vps-hosting?ccode=FRMVDSKV20

    vServer Center stands against SOPA.
    vServer Center's Cloud VPS hosting features:

    * Dedicated Operating System: The Operating System can be changed or upgraded at anytime; Operating Systems supported: Linux CentOS, Ubuntu Linux, Linux openSUSE, Debian Linux, Fedora Linux, FreeBSD, Windows server 2008 and Windows server 2003, Windows 7 and Windows 8 (beta);
    * SolusVM VPS Control Panel: With SolusVM Control Panel customers can self Install OS, reboot VPS, reinstall or upgrade VPS OS, access VPS console remotely;
    * Administrative Access: Root access for the Unix server. Administrative access for the Windows server; Customer can install any software or application on his/her VPS;
    * UnMetered Bandwidth: no surprise bandwidth bill each month;
    * High performance: KVM Performance Benchmarks test scores are even higher than average Dell PowerEdge Xeon Physical Servers;
    * Enterprise Class SAN storage systems and high end physical servers. All live data drives are fiber channel or SAS drives. All live data are protected by dual parity disks plus two additional hot spare disks;
    * Lowest Price Guarantee: Buy with confidence!
    * 100% Uptime Guaranteed! Our enterprise class cloud hosting service is so reliable, we guarantee 100% service uptime!
    * SAS 70 Type II certified Data Center: self owned 20,000 square feet world class data center facility in St. Louis, Missouri, USA;
    * Serving businesses worldwide for eBusiness hosting since 1995. High customer satisfaction. One WebhostingTalk user's praise on the WHT forum: "I just wanted to comment and saw for the few days I've had their service, it has been fantastic! Support has gone out of their way to even check up and let me know they can create an FTP share for my ISO to be mounted. Support responds very quickly. Amazing service!"

    http://www.vservercenter.com/
    High Performance Low Cost Enterprise Class Cloud Server Hosting
    Tel: 1.314.621.9991 (24x7)

    1. Re:vServer Center Cloud VPS by frantock · · Score: 1

      Host my pfSense, LAMP and Exchange boxes here. Support is great. You really can't beat unmetered bandwidth at these prices either...

  44. virtacore by MattW · · Score: 1

    I'm a fan of Virtacore. They're offering VMs on VMware vCloud Director, which means a full gui console, and pricing is basically cheap. (Cheaper than Amazon when you factor in even modest bandwidth and IO charges.)

  45. expect to pay less than $50 a month, expect nothin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you goal is to find a service for less than $50 a month, expect little in terms of service. Your VPS will be loaded at a ratio of 16 to 1 at the minimum, in bad cases 32 to 1 and in horrible cases as far as 64 to 1. Now keep in mind an 8 core handling 16 or 32 VPS's would be alright, but most of these VPS companies tend to use dual core i3's - that being 2 cores and 2 hyperthreaded cores (or the xeon branded i3).

    Really if you not in the $50 a month range forget about it. If you want it done right, you can find tons and tons of dedicated low end servers for $79 and $89 a month.

  46. eApps.com by Mean+Variance · · Score: 1

    I have had a VPS with eApps for a few years. I pay $11/mo. They are a legit hosting service with customer service and tech support by phone.

    I have 3 domains hosted and have had a few brief outages, but nothing major.

    1. Re:eApps.com by thrill12 · · Score: 1

      Here too: multiple domains hosted (1 IP), no major issues. Eapps works pretty good and is reliable. I use the cheapest plan, and mainly rely on mail and basic web hosting services.

      --
      Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
  47. AWS by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

    Amazon's AWS platform is probably as cheap as you can get while still getting good (i.e. not horribly oversold) service. They also offer a free micro instance for a year to get you hooked.

  48. Try Comcast by autarch · · Score: 1

    I live in Minneapolis myself. I have Comcast business service at home with static ips, no bandwidth cap, and several servers live in my basement as I type. It's not super cheap, but it's quite fast and the service and support is quite good. From what I can tell, their business support is totally separate from the consumer support, and is much, much better (competent, responsive, very low hold times).

    1. Re:Try Comcast by XaXXon · · Score: 1

      I'm in Seattle and business comcast is good here too.

    2. Re:Try Comcast by Rugmeister · · Score: 1

      Same here, I'm in the Twin Cities area, and Comcast Business service absolutely rocks. I've switched many of my consulting clients over to it from other ISP's.. Even the consumer grade service Comcast offers is great for running servers on a dynamic IP, because in practice, you end up keeping your same dynamic IP for several years on end. Of course the business class service doesn't cost much more, and it absolutely rules. DOCSIS 3.0 FTW!!!

    3. Re:Try Comcast by WankerWeasel · · Score: 1

      Yup, it's dynamic IPs for residential service but as long as you don't have your modem unplugged for more than 24 hours straight (at which time the lease would expire) then you can keep that same IP for years. At the same time you can upgrade to home based business from Comcast Business for a bit more a month which offers static IPs, ability to host your own servers (you can with residential but aren't suppose to although they'll never know or care) and 24/7/365 trouble calls should you need a tech to come out and fix things.

  49. Linode by Shads · · Score: 1

    Linode all the way, they're aren't kvm but you can run a custom kernel. Their control panel is absolutely top notch.

    I've had vps on linode, amazon, some openvz crap server, godaddy, rackspace, and slicehost. Linode is the one i would recommend.

    --
    Shadus
  50. Linode uses Xen by PAjamian · · Score: 1

    Linode uses Xen and there's nothing wrong with that. In fact, what virtualization backend is in use is probably not of real concern to most people, and just as many prefer Xen as KVM (I think that Xen is arguably better for VPS-style hosting).

    --
    Windows is a bonfire, Linux is the sun. Linux only looks smaller if you lack perspective.
    1. Re:Linode uses Xen by Skapare · · Score: 1

      As long as there is a way to rebuild your image and start over yourself, it shouldn't matter. Separate OS and data/home images would be a plus. If you can do your VM from a shell account, it's a cinch.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:Linode uses Xen by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Linode allows you to create multiple disk images, and mount them wherever you like... changing distros is easy-peasy...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  51. Re:windows 7 Serial key by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Relevant, exciting and well said, sir....

    Now, can someone DELETE this spam please?

  52. Re:ARP Networks by cl0secall · · Score: 1

    Same here. I use mine for secondary DNS and an MX backup. I keep mine upgraded to the latest OpenBSD and also have been very happy.

    --
    Model 551, Chambered in 6mm
  53. Re:ARP Networks by thatkid_2002 · · Score: 2

    I'm with ARP too. They're excellent. The offering is good and the service is great. I'm not changing any time soon as I've already tried Linode,VPSLink and a couple of others. A big reason for going with ARP is if you care about IPv6, good network (peers, and good APAC service). You have complete control over your OS as they run KVM virtualisation.

    The IRC channel is great too and you can chat with the guys who run the servers and some pretty knowledgeable customers. There's a few names in the IRC you may recognise too. The only downside I can see is that their provisioning process is definitely handled manually instead of a fully automated system that can pop out a new VPS in 30 seconds - so if you're used to that you may be annoyed. It's not that slow, and if you're in the USA you're in the right timezone at least.

    I'm running 768 MB, 20 GB, 400 GB USD $20/month and I've been with them about a year and a half.

    A site you may want to browse is http://www.lowendbox.com/ as they get some good deals from satisfactory providers.

  54. Are you sure no none offers this? by icebike · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, no other provider in the area (Twin Cities) offers static IPs and permission to run servers.

    I'm pretty sure Comcast serves the Twin Cities (at least some portions) and they offer static IPs and you can run servers. You need their business package, a few bucks more perhaps. I use this (not in Minnesota), and find it very stable and consistent, and they never give me any crap about what ports I open.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  55. Servint by gollito · · Score: 1

    Great company. All support is local and their servers are fast. free control panel too.

    1. Re:Servint by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      Second servint. I've been a customer for 10 years and a VPS customer for 2. Never disappointed. VPSes hosted in DC and LA.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
  56. SOPA by xombo · · Score: 1

    In the wake of SOPA et al, I recommend Sweden Dedicated http://swedendedicated.com/ .
    It's great because you can brag about the servers being in a Bond Villain style HQ. I've had great uptime and their administrators are competent enough to be helpful when necessary, but don't expect them to do a lot of hand-holding or CPANEL type nonsense.

  57. Re:ThrustVPS by timothyb89 · · Score: 1

    I've been using them as well. Went with them for their low-cost Xen hosting and don't have any regrets. A general VPS tip I've had to learn the hard way: avoid anything OpenVZ. The shared kernel causes lots of problems, especially if the host machine isn't too well maintained.

    One host I used about a year ago couldn't keep their server's clock in-sync at all, eventually the time drifted so much that it broke our Google Apps authentication and brought down email access for the entire building for a couple hours, which we eventually had to fix with a poor software hack. They were impossible to contact, and because it was an OpenVZ VPS, the VM clock was shared with the host, so we couldn't fix the time on our own. Not an issue, as far as I know, with Xen / KVM hosts.

    From what I've read, the cheaper hosts tend to use OpenVZ because they can oversell the server memory a lot easier. Not an issue for Xen / KVM hosts, which is why I'm now using ThrustVPS for all of my personal stuff now - they're the cheapest/best-reviewed Xen host I could find.

  58. Re:Where in twin cities by Skapare · · Score: 1

    ... with static IP, server permissions, IPv6, etc?

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  59. nqhost.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I use nqhost.com...been with them for a few months now. I am also in the twin cities and I'm running a FreeBSD server for IRC. 30gb storage, 512mb ram and unmetered bw. Been good so far. Also have other vps's like Windows or Linux.

  60. Re:Couple of options and my experiences. by Skapare · · Score: 1

    Considering that Linode's staff don't do work in the datacenters (they rely on remote hands & eyes), I'm not sure how you could get that impression.

    Maybe that (using the remote hands of the colo faciliting ... of those that offer such ... is how they resolved it.

    A facility based provider should absolutely have staff on hand at all times that know how to deal with all their hardware, networks, and such.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  61. Re:Comcast Business Class dood by Skapare · · Score: 1

    That's really interesting how they get 13 usable IPs in a /29. Could you teach ME how? Could apply this trick to get 5 usables IPs in a /30?

    Oh wait ... you must be talking about IPv6.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  62. shh! by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Stop advertising Linode...
    I'm also a happy Linode customer... too many customers will split our bandwidth share!

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  63. I use the world's 3rd oldest ISP by Beeftopia · · Score: 1

    I host a few virtual servers with Panix.com.

    I've been using them for several months now. Tech support is great. No downtime, at least none of which I or my users are aware. The staff is very accessible.

  64. ThrustVPS is Pretty Good by Lose · · Score: 1

    I've seen a few other people recommend them already, but I rather enjoyed the low-end VPS offerings from ThrustVPS. I use my VPS for a number of different things (web-facing sandbox, if you will) ranging from web hosting for personal PHP projects to a testing platform for game servers in various configurations.

    I've also found their staff helpful and patient when I put in a ticket for a problem, or via the email support system. Such a recent example coincides with a recent change of passwords I made to many of my accounts around the Internet. Well, I eventually forgot what my new password was that I set to access their client area panel, and when I entered the answer to the security question I set, I discovered that whatever I set had some kind of typo. Via the email support system, I negotiated a means of identifying myself to the staff, who eventually reset my password for me.

    The only "gripe" I have is their various virtual machines they offer aren't all quite up to date. Not ancient, but it would be nice to have an option to use Debian 6, or CentOS 6 (these might have been updated since I last checked a few weeks ago).

    They don't over sell their VPS's. When a server is full, its just full. The users on that server won't see terrible performance as a result. Thrust is usually prompt about setting up more servers as resources permit, but with several different host machines around the world, its not often an issue where you can't get a server near by.

    I've enjoyed their service. I would recommend them to anyone provided they keep their level of service up.

    1. Re:ThrustVPS is Pretty Good by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      I'll second this!! I have 3 of the 512MB "Aquatic" vps in their Dallas DC, used for several wordpress/joomla websites, a shoutcast server, and an OpenSim region on OSGrid. Never had any trouble with them, the few times i've had to contact their support (once for getting the tun0 interface enabled for OpenVPN) they were right on the ball. And you cannot BEAT the $6/mo cost either...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
  65. I use by certain+death · · Score: 1

    View My Server ---> www.viewmyserver.com 2 gig of RAM bustable to 4 gig and 2 cores, 7.5 TB of traffic per month, 75 gig of disk space...for $25.00 per month. They are in Arizona. I have run into issues running Concrete5 on them, but it is a bare metal system, so it is really my problem, not theirs. Concrete5 requires some serious PHP tweaking and I haven't gotten there yet. Really fast support and nice bunch of guys!

    --
    "My immediate reaction is "WTF? What kind of moron doesn't make things 64-bit safe to begin with?" Linus
  66. Bordernode.com by DeusExCalamus · · Score: 1

    I use http://bordernode.com/ Cheap (they have a 30% off coupon right now), works...etc etc.. What's not to love? I have their cheapest plan w/ the gbit upgrade, use it for an IRC server. DDoS-filtered, un-metered inbound bandwidth, ('only' 500gb outbound) can't really complain for $20-something a month.

    --
    "...Sleep comes like a drug in God's country Sad eyes, crooked crosses in God's country..."
  67. Anothet solution by ckthorp · · Score: 1

    I am also in the same area and Comcast Business Internet is a slam dunk if you can get it. The service reps and phone techs are completely different than the home/consumer experience. They have short hold times and the few times I have had outages or cable cuts (stupid building maintenance people!) I have actually been able to get same day on-site techs. They offer statics for a reasonable price and very good throughput. I have a couple different service tiers at different locations, with the highest being DOCSIS3 50/15 service. Let me tell you that it sure is fun to be able to download things at 4MB/sec if it is backed by a good CDN. I know their home customer service blows, but their commercial service is awesome. And they will install commercial service to a home. The only downside is that you can't get a TV+Internet bundle discount (but with DSL, you aren't getting that now anyway).

    1. Re:Anothet solution by ckthorp · · Score: 1

      Hmm, posting from an iPhone apparently snarfs the line breaks...

    2. Re:Anothet solution by Jethro · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Comcast Business will let you run whatever the hell you want.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    3. Re:Anothet solution by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      It's that you should be using HTML paragraphs.

  68. i moved to host chopper, never looked back by decora · · Score: 5, Funny

    after trying FDC, Slicehost, Swvps, & Linode, i finally found a hosting solution that had everything I needed for a good price.

    http://hostchopper.com/

    1. Re:i moved to host chopper, never looked back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      .. HostChopper ?, haha.. what a bunch of jokers

    2. Re:i moved to host chopper, never looked back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why?
      Hostchopper is just a re-seller of Dreamhost.com, it'd be cheaper to just rent a VPS direct from dreamhost.

    3. Re:i moved to host chopper, never looked back by KazW · · Score: 5, Informative

      after trying FDC, Slicehost, Swvps, & Linode, i finally found a hosting solution that had everything I needed for a good price.

      http://hostchopper.com/

      A publicly posted support ticket they show one their site:

      HOLY SHIT... COULD YOUR ENGLISH BE ANY MORE BROKEN? IT REMINDS ME OF A VENTRILOQUIST'S DUMMY AFTER FALLING DOWN ABOUT 12 FLIGHTS OF STAIRS AND THEN BEING CRUSHED IN THE ASS-END OF A GARBAGE TRUCK! YOU COULD USE A PASSROD WHERE THE SUN DON'T SHINE! I'LL HAVE TANGO CONTACT YOU, HE'S INTO SODOMY AND OTHER KINKY SHIT. -NOVEMBER CHIEF EXECUTIVE WIZARD SERIOUS MASTURBATOR HOSTCHOPPER.COM

      "Server: wizardfucker.hostchopper.com"

      Charlie Sheen started a hosting company?

      This hosting company is a good joke, I have mod points but couldn't mod you 'funny' since I wanted to post this, too bad.

      P.S. All kidding aside, anyone willing to pay this "company" for services of any type would be brain dead.

      --
      Geeks don't grock information, they grep it.
  69. If you like Freebsd by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 1

    Try rootbsd.com It is what I use since I wanted a freebsd vps.

    Not the most expensive, not the cheapest, but has been very reliable for me.

    I use it as a VPN server. My home network (FIOS) connects to the vpn Server, this allows me access to all my internal hosts (vmware, storage, various other boxes) from the outside world using port forwarding. Gets around pesky filtering.

    --
    I came, I conquered, I coredumped
  70. SilverRack.com by x10gimli · · Score: 1

    I use http://silverrack.com/ for my VPS hosting right now. I've got some rails apps, Java apps, and a PHP site. I also use it for source control and backups. The service is pretty simple but the price for is good for the amount of bandwidth, memory, and storage that is offered. They allow additional IP addresses to be purchased, provide snapshot backups, and DNS services as well.

    I've also used Linode as to run an external monitoring app. I've liked their service although it cost a little more than SilverRack.

  71. HotSpot Shield by jjp9999 · · Score: 1

    HotSpot Shield is pretty good. They don't store user IPs. They have a free service and a paid one. The free one is good, but puts an ad at the top of your pages while you browse. The paid one is reasonable, and adds a few other perks (pretty sure they make the service a bit faster).

    1. Re:HotSpot Shield by allo · · Score: 1

      hotspotshield is a VPN, not a VPS provider!

    2. Re:HotSpot Shield by jjp9999 · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm an idiot.

  72. EchoServers (www.echoservers.com) by KerrickStaley · · Score: 1

    I have had a VPS with them for over a year; their service works well; no major complaints. The server doesn't have virtual memory, so you run out of RAM sometimes, but this isn't uncommon among providers as far as I can tell.
    $10/month
    512 MB RAM
    15 GB disk
    600 GB transfer/month

  73. EcoVPS by Proteus+Cortex · · Score: 1

    For a while I used EcoVPS (www.ecovps.com) without any problems. Their specs are a little low, though (Guaranteed RAM: 512MB, Disk Space: 5GB, Data Transfer: 100GB)... Also I didn't setup anything too fancy, so these were more than enough for me...

  74. Re:ThrustVPS by kyrio · · Score: 1

    Aww, you gave it away. They are definitely the best, especially considering the price! The last time I checked, they didn't have many servers left. If you want to get on the train, get your ticket now!

  75. Re:ThrustVPS by kyrio · · Score: 1

    I could not agree more about OpenVZ. More importantly, though, is to stay away from providers that only provide OpenVZ. For example, a friend of mine signed up to ThrustVPS after I went on about how amazing their KVM server is, and he got a VZ server. As far as I can tell, that server works just as well as mine. I made a post earlier about blacklisted providers, just search the page for "blacklist". From what i can remember, those hosts only provide OpenVZ servers.

  76. xlshosting by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    xlshosting in the Netherlands are flexible and affordable. Dual data center with fast connectivity to the AMS-IX, choose your own blend. Only thing I can think of that's not what you prefer is that it's Xen-based, so you have to choose which distro you want and get a pre-setup minimal install of that.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  77. BurstNET by jersey_emt · · Score: 1

    I use BurstNET as my VPS provider. I have one VPS with 1 GB of RAM ($9.95 per month) and two with 512 MB of RAM ($5.95 per month). I've had no major issues over the past 6 months, just two minor slowdowns caused by another VPS client on the same node abusing resources (both times, the person was using their VPS as a seedbox). In both cases, the abusive users were removed in less than one hour. They are completely unmanaged/self-managed of course. Meaning that except in cases of hardware failure or network connectivity issues, you're on your own. Just like all other unmanaged VPS providers.

    --
    My spoon is too big.
    1. Re:BurstNET by funfail · · Score: 1

      I second Burst.net. I use a $9.95 VPS with them for the backup DNS and the uptime is very high. They are currently having a 20% holiday discount on all servers (I don't remember the coupon code but you can find it on the net).

    2. Re:BurstNET by rotide · · Score: 1

      BurstNET always had really awful oversubscription issues. Half the time I would take 20%+ Packet Loss and the rest of the time I would have severe IO issues that would just slow it to a crawl. I've moved to BuffaloVPS and have been very happy with them!

  78. get a vps closer to your users by emilper · · Score: 1

    I have two right now: one at Linode (a 512 with Debian, http://linode.com/ and one at Webfusion UK (http://www.webfusion.co.uk/virtual-private-servers/starter/ with Ubuntu) ... with Linode is easier to manage your VPS, you can even have alternate images stored and load the one you need, with WF is easier to manage your sites, if you host sites ...

  79. Define "inexpensive" by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

    Define "inexpensive". Linode are very good in my experience, but some would not call them inexpensive.

    Look at http://www.lowendbox.com/ for some very cheap low-but-fine-for-many-things options, though don't just get one. I have a three of cheap VPSs doing various little things. That are of order of 512Mb RAM (one 1024Mb, always look at the guaranteed memory rather than any burst option when looking at OVZ options), 40Gb disk, 500-1000G bandwidth (though I don't use most of that of that most of the time) and they weight in at less than $20/month in total. But while they are reliable and fast enough for what I ask, I don't entirely trust any of them (at that price there can't be much margin, and many cheap VPS providers go under with little notice) everything is on at least two of them and backup up here so I can switch over with nothing but DNS changes if one host should die.

    You'll get much better customer service response from the likes of Linode, and much less contended outgoing bandwidth and contended I/O, but depending on your needs the cheaper options may offer better value.

  80. You might want to avoid OpenVZ/Virtuozzo by Lazy+Jones · · Score: 1

    On low-end VMs based on OpenVZ, you will run into issues with the limited virtual memory address space. My VPS has 1GB memory and address space and I've been unable to run several important programs because they tried to access large files using mmap().

    --
    "I love my job, but I hate talking to people like you" (Freddie Mercury)
  81. Web In-A-Box for .AU by SJ · · Score: 1

    If you need hosting in Australia, then go for someone like Web In-A-Box. Disclaimer: I'm a reseller of theirs.

    Standard home page.
    Referral link if you want to be nice to me.

    They have their own racks and servers and are a decent and honest bunch of guys. On a technical note, they run Xen and allow you to boot whatever OS you like.

    Remember, trust but verify.

  82. Re:Comcast Business Class dood by mikael_j · · Score: 1

    If you could somehow get an IPv6 /29 you'd have a lot more than 13 usable addresses. I have a /48 that'll last me until every cell in my body decides to connect to the net...

    --
    Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
  83. Re:Hetzner by Quazion · · Score: 2

    Yeah! Hetzner is great. You can cancel the contract per month. So just try it for a month for 8 euro and if you dont like cancel it.

    I have been using for about a year now. Its stable,fast and has a very easy webinterface for reinstalling your OS if needed.

  84. Re:Burst.net by lazybeam · · Score: 1

    I got two windows vpses (one 2003 one 2008) for a specific project from burst.net, and they still have problems. Almost daily blue screens on both, even though these servers don't do much (not publicly advertised, just a step between development and deployment, and all access is password protected). Support was quick to respond with some vague wording that the node had to be rebooted, but couldn't give an explanation more than that. When this project finishes we are cancelling and never using them again.

    --
    --
    no sig for you. come back one year.
  85. Re:VPS? by allo · · Score: 1

    a vServer, where someone thinks its important to point out its private (which means not a machine with a lot of users, but a virtual machine just for you, even when the physical one is shared).

  86. Linode by diego.viola · · Score: 1

    http://www.linode.com/

  87. Go with Linode. by Da+w00t · · Score: 1

    I've been a customer for what feels like 10 years now. Their support is great, they have knowledgable people and yes, you do get root. You can have console access, just not graphical console access. (Who would want X running on a colocated server anyway?)

    Here's their faq: http://www.linode.com/faq.cfm - They've got a great community, go pop on IRC on irc.oftc.net and join #linode. Ask your questions there if there's something you want to know that isn't in the FAQ.

    Here's a referral link - you don't really need to use it, but if you do I'll get some free service as a thank you for referring you.

    http://www.linode.com/?r=8304c52b0c2b67372d5dcbe998ee4e04271275d6

    --

    da w00t. mtfnpy?
    1. Re:Go with Linode. by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      I've been a customer for what feels like 10 years now.

      I've been using Linode since they started as well as various other providers for VPS's and dedicated servers. Everything the parent says is true, Linode rock, they would be my first choice for a small VPS.

  88. best deal going right now by sdnoob · · Score: 1

    if you can get by with the minimal resources...

    hostigation kvm vps 128mb/5gb $20 a year via this deal:
    http://www.webhostingtalk.com//showthread.php?t=1109937

  89. Chunkhost - it's FREE by fak3r · · Score: 1

    This link will get you a free 512M VPS on Chunkhost for a month http://chunkhost.com/r/fak3r (sorry, US only) It matches your requirements, root with SSH is the only way to go. If you don't like it you can cancel it or let it run out; they'll never charge you unless you say you want to keep it after your month is up. I now pay 14$/month for the service, and it's been perfect for what I need. Give them a try, there's nothing to loose, and their service via twitter has been excellent.

  90. Re:Where in twin cities by hawkeyeMI · · Score: 1

    Comcast business connection in the Twin Cities will get you all that except ipv6, and they're rolling that out.

    --
    Error 404 - Sig Not Found
  91. I'm very happy with. . . by mcoffman · · Score: 1

    A Small Orange. I've used them for about 5 years. First few years
    VPS and now with a dedicated server. Good prices and support.

    --
    -MichaelC
  92. Francophone & Spanish options? by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    All comments so far have been anglophone.

    www.synalabs.com is the only francophone company I know of. Servers in Paris, which is close to London server space of course.

    I'm sure there will be others as well for Spanish and so on, anyone with experience from Mexico?

  93. NetSonic is my choice by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

    I've been with NetSonic.Net for the last 5 or 6 years. They're a small-ish outfit from what I can tell but their head support guy really knows his stuff (I really needed his expertise when I was having some trouble migrating from Ensim to Plesk)

    Their bandwidth is very good and in the years I've been with them, there have been only a couple network outages. I don't have hard numbers, but I'm going to guess they've averaged somewhere between 4 and 5 9's

    I have a dedicated server with 4 VPS hosts - Centos with Plesk (I resell some hosting space, so the panel makes it convenient for me to give my customers web-based admin)

    Used to host with OLM ... they were not my favorite.

    --

    The Digital Sorceress
  94. Linode by Spazmania · · Score: 1

    I run around 40 VPS servers scattered across as many locations and service providers as I could find.

    Linode has to be my favorite. 6 server locations in the U.S., U.K. and Japan. Heavily automated, so you don't spend time waiting for a system administrator to do something. Supports Debian Linux in addition to a number of others. Inexpensive. And it performs well.

    I have also had solid success with:
    Servint
    GPLhost
    Slicehost
    to name a few.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
  95. +1 linode by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

    After some researching, Linode seems to be the only reasonably priced VPS provider that nobody is complaining about. Thus I become a client, and I also don't have anything to complain about.

    I can't say their support is good, because I've never needed it. I've never had a problem with them.

  96. Re:Comcast Business Class dood by Spazmania · · Score: 1

    5 usable IP's in a /30 is easy: 1 router IP and the /30 routed to it. Instead of exposing the /30 internally, expose a larger subnet where the /30 falls in the middle and use proxy arp.

    13 usable IPs in a /29 is more of a challenge. ;-)

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
  97. Gandi.net by debrain · · Score: 1

    I just discovered Gandi.net in another Slashdot article, and they offer VPS. Does anyone have any experience with them?

    I've been using Linode (transferred from Slicehost). Linode is fabulous, and Slicehost was great in its day but hasn't really been updated since Rackspace bought it. I'm curious how Gandi.net compares.

    1. Re:Gandi.net by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Gandi are a very well respected DNS registrar. I've used them for VPS service though.

  98. Re:Comcast Business Class dood by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

    The point that there aren't 13 addresses in a /29 still holds.

    A /29 has 8 adddresses, total. Or 6 usable addresses.

  99. Re: ThrustVPS by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

    I run several wordpress/joomla websites, a shoutcast station, and an OpenSim simulator on three OpenVZ/Ubuntu 512MB VPS from ThrustVPS. I've been with them nearly two years with zero problems. The "slices" cost me $6/mo each. This vendor is the lowest priced OpenVZ vendor I've found, and since I run these sites non-profit, I need to keep the costs down. I have an OpenVPN tunnel from each of them to my home network where I rsync each of them nightly, as I fully realize that even though I've had no trouble with them, trouble may be right around the corner, and I want to be able to quickly restore everything to a new slice if neccessary. They offer locations in Dallas, LA, New Jersey and Maidenhead UK. I'm considering getting another one in the UK to set up a vpn/proxy to allow me to watch UK tv over the Internet. They also offer Xen-based Linux and Windows VPs in all locations. The 512MB OpenVZ slices are 512MB/1024MB burst, 15GB diskspace, 1TB/mo transfer. All in all, for my uses, I'm totally pleased with them. As usual, no financial ties to them, just a satisfied customer..

    --
    THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
  100. One provider in twin cities? You're retarded. by mnslinky · · Score: 1

    There are countless providers of DSL and/or cable internet that allow hosting of servers and provide static IPs.

      ipHouse
      Visi
      Comcast
      CenturyLink/MSN

    Just to name a few.

  101. Plug for a good Bitcoin VPS provider -- BTCVPS.NET by phungus · · Score: 1

    Just wanted to add that I am a fan of http://btcvps.net

    They are a relatively new VPS operation but they have knowledgeable admins available in their IRC support channel at all hours of the day. The servers have been fairly reliable as they are hosted in very solid datacenters.

    If you have a need for a VPS where you can pay pseuodononymously using Bitcoin, they seem to be one of the easiest to work with.

    p

  102. Re:Comcast Business Class dood by mikael_j · · Score: 1

    No, for IPv6 a /29 would have a lot more than 8 addresses (IPv6 is 128 bits, not 32. In general ISPs will get a /32 that they can split up into /48 or /64 chunks for their customers).

    But yes, for IPv4 there are fewer than 13 addresses.

    --
    Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
  103. Linode by 1s44c · · Score: 1

    There are a lot of VPS providers that provide a good, stable, service but most of them are not cheap.

    If you want good and cheap you want Linode as first choice and Bytemark as a close second. You won't go wrong with either of these.

  104. JaguarPC by MyHair · · Score: 1

    I switched to JaguarPC for an unmanaged Debian VPS after my old provider had my VPS down 5 days, didn't communicate with me well and ultimately never got my VPS and data back. (I kept my own backups, luckily.) JaguarPC had a special running and had been in business 10 years at the time, so I gave them a try. Never a problem. 3 years later they upgraded my resources and lowered my fee, and did it without having to restart my VPS. I once got an email that they were experiencing a DDoS attack that might affect me and pointed me to a website with running updates, but it didn't seem to affect me. Much better service than I had before and have seen with my friends' providers who would have issues, look at the status page and get a false "everything is fine!" message. I'm about to leave them to self-host at home, so I wrote them a thank-you blog singing their praises.

  105. Re:ARP Networks by awyeah · · Score: 1

    I'm also a big fan of Arp. I pay $24/month for 768mb of RAM, 20GB of disk space, plus a /29 block of IPv4 and a /48 block of IPv6. Great support, although I've only ever needed it once. The guy who runs it hangs out on IRC a lot so you can ask questions there too. You get SSH access to the *console* (like a serial console, in case you get locked out).

    Overall, I can't speak highly enough of them.

    --
    Why, no, I haven't meta-moderated lately. Thanks for asking!
  106. More props for Linode.... by MeTaLNETwEeK! · · Score: 1

    I needed a host to handle my OpenArena server (MeTaLNET) that I had been running for a year out of my garage, during a short-term period of couch-hopping in-between housing, because I was really enjoying hosting the game and was starting to accrue a great bunch of regulars playing on my server. After a tiny bit of self-education about virtual hosting, I decided to settle on Linode because they seemed to be one of the premier Xen-based offerings, and Xen sounded like the way to go for my needs. I backed up my server configs and such, e-mailed the stuff to one of my regulars, and started up a base-level Linode account for us. Within a week, we had our old server back up and running, now on the Linode, with better performance for everyone - not just our regulars, but for newcomers from around the world, as well. The transition was really simple, since we were able to run essentially the same O/S version that I had been able to use in my garage. Here we are, just about a year later now, and I'm proud to say our bottom- level Linode server is now hosting about 12 game servers spanning three games, a web file-dump, a web forum and wiki, an e-mail system, full IDS and more. Performance is great, we still haven't gotten even close to tapping out that little slice even though it's only got 512MB RAM! We only get the occasional lag-burp that's apparently caused by disk I/O, probably just our swap file, so we're looking at implementing ZRAM to see if that will help us squeeze even more out of the system. Bottom line? We've created a growing group of gamers who are all getting enjoyment out our little Linode, and have achieved goals we never imagined, all for $20/month - which is far cheaper than the cable access I had been originally paying for at the house where my server was originally located. The folks at Linode were great, both technically and with regard to courtesy, the one or two times I talked to them on the phone with basic questions. Guess I don't need to say much more - Linode has been great for my needs!

  107. GoldenGate Internet Services in Minneapolis by Spacequad · · Score: 1

    It's rather funny that the person asked for a VPS hosting company located in the Twin Cities for a reason and everyone is mentioning how good or bad the the services are at some place else outside Minnesota. GoldenGate Internet Services, also known as IPHouse, http://www.goldengate.net/ located at 331 2nd Ave S, Suite 540, Minneapolis MN 55401 Phone: 612-337-6337. Has been around since the early 1990's, and has opened a few data centers in and around the Twin Cities, with the main data center located in Blaine, MN. I was a customer of theirs since they opened until I moved 10 years ago. I've never had any significant problems with their services, like outages, or unscheduled down time. Give them a try. Notice I did not post a referral link other than their actual site link, and I'm not getting paid. This is how much I believe in their services.

  108. lowendbox.com by NewYork · · Score: 1

    You may talk to these guys for a customized hosting http://www.lowendbox.com/

  109. Twin Cities by NewWorldDan · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure who the OP is getting his DSL service from, but it's probably not Century Link (formerly Qwest). From the beginning, Qwest offered a choice of ISPs with their DSL service. The newer, higher speeds (anything above 1.5mbps) only goes over MSN. This is a consequence of the DSL equipment that they are now using, not any overt attempt to screw over their customers (that's just a happy bonus to them). In any event, I had a a static IP with Century Link and MSN. It's not advertised, and it was a bit of work to find it and set it up, but it's there (and it only cost me an extra $5/month). There are a few stray pockets in the Twin Cities that are served by other phone companies, so the OP may be correct, but I'm kind of doubtful. Now, I did switch off from CenturyLink/MSN for something cheaper and faster as of about 2 months ago, but at that time, the static IPs were still available.

  110. Twin Cities by WankerWeasel · · Score: 1

    You can get Comcast Business Class which offers static IPs and allows you to host a server. You can also do the home based business option which isn't much more than normal residential service, has higher speeds, and gives you 24/7/365 trouble calls among other advantages.

  111. prgmr.com by nobaloney · · Score: 1

    The owner of prgmr.com is one of the authors of The Book of Xen; he does an excellent job, worth more than the $5 you pay for the smallest instance, and he really does know what he's doing (read the book to see just how much he knows).

  112. vpsfarm.com by furrymitn · · Score: 1

    Reliable, fast, and low-cost(as low as .03 cents/hour(USD). I've used them for years for hosting sites, as well as testbed stuff. Never had issues that weren't handled within minutes.

  113. $1 a month? by h00manist · · Score: 1

    http://www.fastvps.co/vps-hosting.php

    These guys are having a promo for $1 a month, although it ends today. Something's just odd. It's just too cheap.

    --
    Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/