Slashdot Mirror


Florida Teen Charged With Felony Hacking For Changing Desktop Wallpaper

colinneagle writes: A 14-year-old middle school student in Holiday, Florida, was arrested this week and charged with "an offense against a computer system and unauthorized access," which is a felony. The student reportedly used an administrator password to log into a teacher's computer and change the background image to a photo of two men kissing.

The student also revealed his secrets after he was caught – the password was the teacher's last name, and the teacher had typed it in in full view of the students. The student said many other students used these administrators' passwords (their teachers' last names) so they can screen-share and video chat with other students. The student was briefly held in a nearby detention center, and the county Sheriff warned that other teenagers caught doing the same thing will "face the same consequences."

392 of 629 comments (clear)

  1. Must example set of him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Twart future terrorists in their tracks must.

    1. Re: Must example set of him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Justice system is retarded.

    2. Re:Must example set of him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Especially because he put GAY GUYS on the computer, the horrors. If he had changed the wallpaper to a cat picture this would not have happened I guarantee it.

    3. Re:Must example set of him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you mean the teacher, then I whole heartedly agree. We must make an example of the moronic teacher that used their password (and a galacticly stupid one at that) in front of the class.

      The only person at fault is the teacher.

      Kids will be kids - it was better to change a wallpaper to "show the teacher the error of their ways" than to bully some poor dumb jock.

    4. Re: Must example set of him by weilawei · · Score: 5, Funny

      Retarded, justice system is. For you that fixed.

    5. Re: Must example set of him by khelms · · Score: 2

      There you go trying to inject common sense into the law!

    6. Re:Must example set of him by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      A man must be gay to kiss another man?

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    7. Re: Must example set of him by MitchDev · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because a 14 year old that did the equivalent or pray-painting graffiti is a much safer "collar" that stopping real criminals out on the street....
      THe story is another example of why America is a laughing-stock...

    8. Re:Must example set of him by Wain13001 · · Score: 1

      in most parts of 'murica? yeah, unfortunately this is so.

    9. Re:Must example set of him by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      So he could have put anything in the person's computer and you'd be fine with that? How about if he SWATs the teacher?

    10. Re:Must example set of him by Sarius64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Personally I think the kid did him a favor. If someone with ill intent had the password I'm thinking a lot more problems than wallpaper changes could have occurred. It is definitely the teacher's fault that this happened.

    11. Re: Must example set of him by tompaulco · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So how does changing a wall paper (which could easlily be switched back) equate to FELONY which is supposed to mean "serious crime", right up there with murder, rape, bank robery, kid napping, and a number of others.

      It doesn't, but that was not the crime. That was one of the byproducts of the crime. The crime was hacking into the computer. Even if you know the password, if you the authorized user for the account used, then that is hacking. If you don't like the law, there are two things you can do. Either 1. Don't break the law. or 2. Appeal to your congresscritter to get the law changed.
      That being said, changing desktop wallpaper or other configuration on someone else's computer is extremely rude and not befitting of a member of society.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    12. Re: Must example set of him by TwoEyedJack · · Score: 1

      IMHO exposing children to such moronic supervision borders on child abuse. Your government at work.

    13. Re: Must example set of him by C0R1D4N · · Score: 5, Informative

      In the defense of our continent sized nation, Florida is the laughing stock of America.

    14. Re: Must example set of him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How old are you? There's this thing called "perspective" that gets applied to crimes... usually. See, if we put everything through your black/white strainer, then the toddler who takes an extra candy at the teller window is effectively committing bank robbery. Do you understand how absurd that is, or would you like to stick to your guns and start putting toddlers in prison?

    15. Re:Must example set of him by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      If I were him it would be an option.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    16. Re: Must example set of him by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      Personally I give this kid more credit than calling him a script kiddie, at least he did it the old fashioned way!

      Bravo next-gen hacker. Even if it was just changing the wall paper, isn't that what hacking used to be about? Harmless non-malicious antics on a system because you could.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    17. Re: Must example set of him by war4peace · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The amount of times I played similar pranks on lesser knowledgeable students while in college should have put me behind bars for 3 life sentences.
      Yet, I have grown to be a responsible family man.
      Maybe if i would have been put in jail for such things i would have been a hardened criminal by now.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    18. Re: Must example set of him by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      I live in America as well and I know those I've had dealings with a majority are not worth defending for anything.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    19. Re: Must example set of him by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      My government wouldn't do that, my government would run the fucking country to the betterment of it's people vs it's corporate interests.

      There is a difference between a government for the people and the piece of shit we are stuck with. Note by piece of shit I'm referring to every worthless bastard in office right now, each and every one of them.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    20. Re:Must example set of him by bhv · · Score: 1

      you keep your sticky lips to yourself, bud!

    21. Re: Must example set of him by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Justice system is retarded.

      This kid's parents aren't too bright either. Parents have a responsibility to ensure that their kids understand their legal and constitutional rights. I have a teenage daughter, and I have taught her that if she is questioned by the police, she should say exactly four words:
      1. I
      2. want
      3. my
      4. parents.
      Then she should say NOTHING else, until I am there. The police have no right to interrogate a kid without a parent or guardian present. I also made sure my kids watched this video: Never talk to the police. The kid is TFA is in trouble because he mouthed off, and made the authorities look stupid.

    22. Re: Must example set of him by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      If you don't like the law, there are two things you can do. Either 1. Don't break the law. or 2. Appeal to your congresscritter to get the law changed. That being said, changing desktop wallpaper or other configuration on someone else's computer is extremely rude and not befitting of a member of society.

      Meh, I'm going to go with option 3; breaking the law and doing my best not to get caught. Insert Judas Priest song here.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    23. Re:Must example set of him by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Especially because he put GAY GUYS on the computer, the horrors. If he had changed the wallpaper to a cat picture this would not have happened I guarantee it.

      when you are 14, that's the pinnacle of humor.

      anyway, good job trying to turn this into an issue of sexism. if you read into this that homosexuality had anything to do with it, you are the one with the problem.

    24. Re:Must example set of him by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      He's damn right that this wouldn't have happened with cat pictures, though...

    25. Re:Must example set of him by operagost · · Score: 1

      Umm... I disagree to the extent that a cat picture might have been considered odd, but not alarming. I could imagine other things that would caught someone's attention.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    26. Re:Must example set of him by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 1

      My high school English teacher was Mr Garrison. I never met Mr. Slave.

      --
      I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
    27. Re: Must example set of him by operagost · · Score: 2

      The UK's cities have video cameras on every street corner, Australia wants to heavily regulate 3D printers in case someone decides to make a plastic gun, China DOSes web sites it doesn't like, ISIS is slaughtering Christians and Jews wherever it finds them, and the USA is a laughing stock?

      Your perspective is dysfunctional, to say the least.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    28. Re: Must example set of him by sabri · · Score: 1

      This kid's parents aren't too bright either

      I agree, but for a different reason.

      I would have threatened to sue the school for the lack of proper information security. If teachers are allowed to use their last name as their password and type it out in front of students then something is severely wrong and it has to be assumed that a data breach has already happened undetected.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    29. Re: Must example set of him by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Moral relativism is not a valid counter-argument.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    30. Re:Must example set of him by operagost · · Score: 2

      OK, I don't get it. American culture is defective because straight men don't kiss other men? I'm having trouble keeping up.

      Wait, no-- you're just an idiot. Had me going there for a minute.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    31. Re:Must example set of him by nwaack · · Score: 2

      Don't turn this into some kind of homophobia thing. You're just stirring a pot that doesn't need any more stirring.

    32. Re: Must example set of him by amber_of_luxor · · Score: 1

      I really wish I remember the legal citation for the case where the perp read the password on a Post-It note on the monitor.
      Perp went to jail for breaking and entering.
      Was not guily of unauthorized access to the computer system.

      There are several other court cases where the rule is that if the password is known, then the access is authorized, regardless of how the perp came to know the password.

      --
      Wind Beneath Thy Wings
    33. Re: Must example set of him by operagost · · Score: 1

      The very statement "laughing stock" is a comparative one, so I was answering that fallacious statement. Obviously, felony charges for changing desktop wallpaper is absurd, and so are the other items I mentioned.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    34. Re:Must example set of him by sconeu · · Score: 1

      I'm not your bud, guy!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    35. Re: Must example set of him by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Do you understand the law Potsy. That's what matters. You don't like it, then change the law. Don't go crying because the cop did their job. What the kid did also amounts to cyber bullying. Feel lucky he wasn't charged with that.

    36. Re: Must example set of him by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Maybe the kid shouldn't have hacked into the teachers computer - you know - which is breaking the law. Idiot.

    37. Re:Must example set of him by OmegaWolf747 · · Score: 1

      Twart future terrorists in their tracks must.

      I believe this is way more the system's fault than the students'. Why were they using such easily guessed passwords? The first rule of thumb is never to use an actual word or name as a password. Beyond that, why are the police even involved in this matter. Give the kid a detention and revoke his computer privileges for a while. There's simply no need to cuff a kid and lock them up for changing a computer wallpaper.

      --
      I charge forward recklessly, leaving chaos in my wake.
    38. Re:Must example set of him by Quasimodem · · Score: 1

      Not in the Mafia, but that has undesired consequences, too.

    39. Re: Must example set of him by mysidia · · Score: 3, Informative

      The law is screwed up. This isn't hacking. Hacking is when someone intrudes into a properly secured computer system containing high-valued data and conducts ransom, espionage, theft, damage in a large amount, such as stealing SSNs, identity theft, or intellectual property on which a business is based.

      This is the equivalent of the teacher leaving the grade book unattended on his table instead of locking it in the desk and exits the room for a moment, and a student sneaks over to it and pencils in a lewd picture on the cover.

      The kid is deserving of detention, and possibly suspension for petty vandalism, especially if there's an ongoing discipline issue.

      No friggin' jail time or criminal charges for ordinary childish behavior.

      If there's a crime; it should be misdemeanor for disorderly conduct in posting sexually explicit photos.

    40. Re:Must example set of him by mysidia · · Score: 1

      So they're discriminating against the student and choosing to file criminal charges because of his sexual orientation, whereas a heterosexual posting a cat picture as wallpaper would not have been charged?

    41. Re: Must example set of him by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      Just what do you think a cop's job is?

    42. Re: Must example set of him by Quasimodem · · Score: 1
      If you are sending in your official removal notification, that would be the Eugene Pool.

      .

      Also, too, one double click to change the smooching homos to a JPEG of the Straits of Magellan, for example, would have taken 3/5ths of a second, instead of indulging oneself in these bloody histrionics. Tell me true, the teacher also was the school drama coach, am I right?

    43. Re:Must example set of him by Quasimodem · · Score: 1

      The least the teacher could have done was use his birthday. Then perhaps his students' math skills would have been challenged.

    44. Re: Must example set of him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Adults should keep the exact same strategy in mind, with one minor substitution. Replace parents with lawyer.

    45. Re: Must example set of him by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Bullshit.

      Texas won that back when Perry was elected.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    46. Re:Must example set of him by Livius · · Score: 1

      Of course he would have been charged (because they can), but the media wouldn't have cared as much.

    47. Re:Must example set of him by flyneye · · Score: 1

      MMMM, oh the memories...
      The teacher with the Phat ass, that I just couldn't resist smacking. Then the wink and smile I got instead of the trouble I expected.
      But then, I didn't change anyones wallpaper to a gross-out shot.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    48. Re: Must example set of him by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      This is /., where we have, "news for nerds," and stuff.

      Nerds know full well that accessing any computer system without permission is a felony.

      Now, you can hang Christmas ornaments on that statement or paint it shit-brindle brown, but it doesn't change the simple fact that accessing any computer system without permission is a felony.

      So it is written, so let it be done.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    49. Re: Must example set of him by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Stopping real criminals is a good way to get shot. Collaring 14 year old students is much safer.

    50. Re: Must example set of him by Agripa · · Score: 1

      If it is the only way to fix the law? Yes, put those toddlers in prison.

    51. Re: Must example set of him by Livius · · Score: 1

      the USA is a laughing stock?

      Yes. One among many.

      Americans can't seem to imagine any situation where they're not special.

    52. Re: Must example set of him by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Is there anyone here who has never changed someone else's wallpaper at work? There are pictures out there that are a lot grosser than 2 guys kissing or the goat guy.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    53. Re:Must example set of him by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      Not the "SWAT" he was talking about.

    54. Re: Must example set of him by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      You don't like it, then change the law. Don't go crying because the cop did their job.

      In a sane society, it is the job of a cop to use the law as a tool to keep the peace and protect people's rights, not to enforce every minor idiotic whim of those mentally and morally twisted enough to secure for themselves a place in the legislature. Separation of powers has a purpose.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    55. Re: Must example set of him by ATMAvatar · · Score: 1

      This is the equivalent of the teacher leaving the grade book unattended on his table instead of locking it in the desk and exits the room for a moment, and a student sneaks over to it and pencils in a lewd picture on the cover.

      Actually, there's a better analogy I can think of. The teacher leaves a spare key under the doormat of their home, tells the entire class about it, and then one (or more) of the kids gets the idea to place a lewd poster or life-size cut-out just inside the entrance, so the teacher will see it upon opening the front door.

      It's still stupid for the teacher to do so, but the kids are also still trespassing on the teacher's property.

      Now, when I was growing up, doing either would have gotten you suspended. A felony charge is a bit excessive for a harmless prank done by a stupid kid.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    56. Re: Must example set of him by reve_etrange · · Score: 1

      changing desktop wallpaper [is] not befitting of a member of society

      Jeeze, I bet you're the life of the party.

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    57. Re: Must example set of him by reve_etrange · · Score: 1

      Maybe the kid shouldn't have hacked into the teachers computer

      Ah, you're one of those types who equate accessing a contextual menu with hacking. Sorry, but your nerd card has been revoked.

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    58. Re: Must example set of him by reve_etrange · · Score: 1

      The UK's cities have video cameras on every street corner, Australia wants to heavily regulate 3D printers in case someone decides to make a plastic gun, China DOSes web sites it doesn't like, ISIS is slaughtering Christians and Jews wherever it finds them, and the USA is a laughing stock because of its morally defunct justice system.

      FTFY.

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    59. Re: Must example set of him by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Note the summary says "teachers' last names", so even worse, these might be the default passwords assigned to them by the sysadmin.

    60. Re: Must example set of him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, I am quite sure a teenage prankster is changing the picture to two men greeting each other.

    61. Re:Must example set of him by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Well, it's an issue of sensitivity. The teachers are clearly at fault for the kid not having learned that it's all perfectly alright for two men to kiss. The school system must be promoting homophobia or something. Fetch the banners!

    62. Re: Must example set of him by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Don't trivialize a serious issue. People in Australia have actually BEEN CAUGHT making plastic gun parts! It's no laughing matter at all!

    63. Re: Must example set of him by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The fourth option is to break the law and try to get caught. When you're about to be cuffed up and moved to the van, you sing 'We shall not be moved.' Your buddy Vern sings the 'just like constipation' verse though, and ruins the song.

    64. Re: Must example set of him by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Where I work, they recently decided that the entire enterprise should load a central wallpaper referenced as a bitmap stored in a server folder.

      The stakes are higher, but the payoff is also higher.

    65. Re:Must example set of him by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      Growing up in Middle school I remember creating a QBASIC program that was a full screen BSOD with a fake virus warning. I put it on a floppy (used an AOL floppy naturally) and loaded it in the autoexec.bat of various Win9x machines on display at Radio Shack, and Best Buy. This fake BSOD would pop up before Windows actually loaded. It was hilarious to watch the paid employees, at least 10+ years older than me, struggle with basic computer troubleshooting while we ate our ice cream at the food court across the way.

      In High school I remember we could just disconnect the Ethernet, hit "Cancel" on the login prompt for Windows 98, and it would log in anyways, then plug in the cable to restore Internet access.

      In university they had a pay credit system on the printers. I remember realizing that I could print to file (.PRN), then use netcat to send the file to the IP of the printer and bypass the print credit system. I created a BAT file to automate this (so I could select what printer in what computer lab). Once word of this got around, I started sending threatening messages to the LCD display on the printer "Print Theft detected, IT notified" to try and scare people off.

      As a grown adult, when IT erroneously locks out users, on several occasions, I've pulled the Ethernet cord, logged in using the last known credentials for the user, then plugged in the Ethernet to restore Email, Internet, and local access.

    66. Re: Must example set of him by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      The crime was hacking into the computer.

      No, the crime was annoying his teacher by promoting gays. Hacking into the computer is merely the legal justification for arresting him. If the crime was actually hacking into the computer via the teacher's incredibly insecure password, then every other kid that got caught doing anything which required admin privileges would have likewise been arrested.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    67. Re:Must example set of him by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It is definitely the teacher's fault that this happened.

      It's my fault if someone steals my car when I leave it on the road unlocked with the keys in the ignition?

      No.

      People need to respect property boundaries. Blaming the victim when someone tampered with their gear is quite asinine, and the only difference between this action here and the gang rape / murder of that Indian girl who should have "known better than to be out after 9pm" is the magnitude of the crime.

      Do you always blame the victim or is this a special circumstance because it involves a computer?

    68. Re: Must example set of him by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what you are trying to say. But it seems to me that operagost is making a moral absolutist argument. Saying American isn't doing these [worse] things that these other countries are doing which he considers worse, and so is not the laughing stock of the world.

    69. Re:Must example set of him by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Gay cats? What's the Interwebs coming to?

    70. Re: Must example set of him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's a tough choice really.

      I've cooperated with cops before and I have never been arrested. Some of those times I cooperated the cops gave me field sobriety tests which are basically "let us gather more evidence against you" tests.

      You know you're in trouble when they start asking you to follow their pen with your eyes, but you're already in compliance mode. You saw their lights come on, you pulled over in accordance with what the law tells you to do - I mean if you didn't go completely batshit crazy and try to run from the cops. That's a very bad idea and one that will almost certainly land you in jail with lots of other charges filed against you if you even survive.

      Then you know you're REALLY in trouble when they ask you to step out of the car. I think this usually means they intend to arrest you, although I've been asked to step out of my car at least twice and have never been arrested. At what point am I supposed to ask for a lawyer?

      I went along with their song and dance. I did the field sobriety tests. One time I was sure I was going to be arrested. I even had cocaine in my car.. I just knew I was fucked. They asked me to get out of the car. They asked me to walk a straight line and count backwards from 100 and all that shit and I guess I did okay.

      They told me to get back in my car and wait, which I did. Should I have called my lawyer then? Difficulty: This was before cell phones were common and I didn't have one.

      After what seemed like an eternity they came back and told me to step out of my car again. I was really expecting them to arrest me, but instead they looked me right in the eye and said "If we took you downtown right now, you'd probably blow right on the line" and they said some other stuff, wrote me a few tickets and let me go.

      I can only imagine how that might have gone in I had started begging for a lawyer when they first asked me to step out of my car.

      From the very start of my encounter with those cops, I was respectful and cooperative. I didn't give them any shit and I complied with every demand and answered every question they asked. I even think part of what led them to give me a break on the DUI was that I was honest enough to tell them that I hadn't updated my address on my driver's license (which they did give me a ticket for in addition to the other tickets). You'd have to ask them to be sure, but I got the feeling that they really didn't want to fuck my life up too much by arresting me especially since I wasn't being an asshole and I'm sure it didn't hurt that I didn't have a criminal record already and I was white and I had a valid license and insurance.

      At what point do you start demanding a lawyer? I'd say when the handcuffs come out, but even in that case I just described I was SURE I was going to be arrested and by cooperating with the cops (which might have influenced them to let me go) I was only giving them evidence against me.

      It's sort of a game. The way to win is to not deal with cops at all, but if you do have to deal with them taking an adversarial approach and trying to use a lawyer as a barrier between you and them is only going to make them look at you harder.

      I will concede though that if you're really guilty of something serious you'd better get that lawyer between you and the cops.

    71. Re: Must example set of him by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Discretion. Google it.

      Don't go crying because the cop did their job.

      You'll do more than that if you got picked up for one of the three-felonies-a-day the average person "commits" just going about their day.

      Authoritarian tools....

    72. Re:Must example set of him by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Really? Why?

      And define homophobia. I don't think a fear of homos (humam) is what you mean.

    73. Re: Must example set of him by CryoKeen · · Score: 1

      eh, come on now why such a hard line? I mean I understand what you're talking about in theory but in practice cops are people too and sometimes they just want to know basic information if we treat them like enemies like this they will treat us like enemies I suppose since you're talking about your children I can respect what you're trying to tell them since they may not have the cognitive capacity to tell if the police are manipulating them however I've also heard people say here " never talk to the cops ever ever ever always ask for a lawyer" it's not like every single time a police officer opens his mouth he's trying to manipulate you there were two police officers at a community meeting today I attended and I almost asked him a question but someone else asked it before me

    74. Re: Must example set of him by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Wrong...

      The job of a cop is to enforce all laws and bring people to justice through the justice system. Failures to do so ends with bad laws that are selectively enforced and disproportionately enforced law giving appearances of if not just outright discrimination ingrained into the justice system.

      A car load of white boys being igored while doing 10mph over the posted speed limit while the black man following gets pulled over because its a white neighborhood is exactly what happens when cops act like you suggest. The cops have to use the law. If there are silly laws,they need to be changed. But they absolutely need to be enforced indiscriminately.

    75. Re: Must example set of him by Tijaska · · Score: 1

      The kid is lucky they didn't shoot him in the back. Others have been shot for less reason.

    76. Re:Must example set of him by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      It's defective because it is commonplace in the US to ridicule other cultures where this is considered normal.

    77. Re: Must example set of him by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      The law is screwed up. This isn't hacking. Hacking is when someone intrudes into a properly secured computer system containing high-valued data and conducts ransom, espionage, theft, damage in a large amount, such as stealing SSNs, identity theft, or intellectual property on which a business is based.

      No it isn't. Hacking is simply accessing something you're not supposed to. Sure the punishment here is ridiculous as the offence is the equivalent of defacing an exercise book, but it's technically still hacking.

    78. Re: Must example set of him by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      If you don't like the law, there are two things you can do. Either 1. Don't break the law. or 2. Appeal to your congresscritter to get the law changed.

      I can think of some other options:
      3. Abuse it for your own benefit
      4. Move to a different place with different laws that you find more satisfactory
      5. Revolt and overthrow the government
      I'm sure there are many others...

    79. Re: Must example set of him by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Australia wants to heavily regulate 3D printers in case someone decides to make a plastic gun,

      The difference is, someone somewhere wants this, which is not the same is this actually happened and was brought into law by anyone with the power to do so. See how that works?
      Probably not, because it is true that the US is the laughing stock, at least when it comes to OECD standards for health, education, social equality, legal rights etc etc...

    80. Re: Must example set of him by antdude · · Score: 1

      Heh, one of my boss(es) changed wallpapers to look like a real desktop at work over a decade ago. It was harmless and funny. :)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    81. Re: Must example set of him by war4peace · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I as doing. Setting taskbar to auto-hide, web wallpaper setting, all icons on desktop were there (in the screenshot set as wallpaper) and people were fruitlessly trying to click on them.
      I mostly got "you can do that? HOW?" and explained away, "victims" left the scene more knowledgeable.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    82. Re: Must example set of him by mysidia · · Score: 1

      It's still stupid for the teacher to do so, but the kids are also still trespassing on the teacher's property.

      No... your new analogy is not a good one. The kids are not trespassing on the teacher's real property, only on portable belongings which are located on the school grounds.

      Invading someone's house is a serious crime. Although the teacher informing the kids there's a key under the doormat would be tacit permission to enter , since telling someone how to get into your house is a way of granting implicit permission -- thus making it a non-crime to use the key.

      In fact.... the students' have permission to use the computer. The problem is not going somewhere they shouldn't; it's doing something with the property they have not been granted permission to do with that property, even if they weren't explicitly told they cannot do it.

    83. Re:Must example set of him by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      Yes, you apparently would pull out the shotgun and kill children for grabbing a candy bar as you compare their act to gang rape. You're a moron.

    84. Re:Must example set of him by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Not blaming the victim regardless of the crime does not mean that the punishment would be equal in all circumstances.

      The child would get a spanking / time-out / whatever other catchy modern day parenting technique is used. Point was that it's not the victim's fault if a kid steals their candy.

      Next time you go to call someone a moron maybe look up the difference between crime and punishment, and get some basic reading comprehension skills first.

    85. Re:Must example set of him by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I think I had a friend who gave his friend (not me..) a blow job to find out how it was. With condom but whatever.

      So I'd say that depends on how relaxed you are.

    86. Re: Must example set of him by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

      File a bug report.

    87. Re:Must example set of him by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1
    88. Re: Must example set of him by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      ...and a student sneaks over to it and pencils in a lewd picture on the cover.

      I agree with almost everything you said. But in what way is a picture of two men kissing "lewd"?

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    89. Re: Must example set of him by JakeBurn · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? This isn't about hacking and neither is the law. The law is about unauthorized use of computer systems and what you do with that access. Instead of wasting your time with irrelevant analogies, maybe say why you feel what he did was not what the law indicated as illegal activity? Unless you know of paper grade books in use that require a login id and password as well as having laws covering its use. Whether or not its a shitty law is irrelevant. While I committed nearly the same act in the late '90s and only received three days suspension, I did so when there wasn't a law covering what I did. Same goes for a guy I had to fire for not showing up to work. He was just like that kid in the fact that he thought his bad action was only kind of bad before the legal system pointed out that there are in fact laws that cover this action and it is in fact, very bad. My ex-employee stole two 2X4's worth less than ten dollars and is now serving a sixteen year prison sentence for it. Was it his fault that he didn't know just having an unsecured firearm in his truck would make his petty theft a felony? It doesn't matter what he thought because the law says otherwise. Is it his fault that he didn't know our state has PFO laws that add mandatory sentences for what he didn't know would be a felony to begin with? It doesn't matter what he thought because the law says otherwise. Saying he deserves a break means you think that some people should be allowed to break the law if they are ignorant of it. While that sounds good on paper, the Romans found thousands of years ago that people will always claim ignorance when given a chance and having a zero tolerance policy on that topic means your citizens either educate themselves on the relevant laws regarding their lives or they suffer the consequences. His intent was clearly malicious but pointing out that it wasn't nearly as malicious as the worst case scenarios of what that law covers is also irrelevant. The fact that he used a picture of two men kissing, and any random jury of 12 will likely have a homosexual citizen among those 12 people means that this kid will likely not find a friendly jury. If his charges stick and it goes to trial he's fucked and deservedly so. I personally find no sympathy with bullies and find no reason to support them when they find themselves in the low end of the criminal pool regardless of their intent.

    90. Re:Must example set of him by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      No, I disagree with you; there are levels of response when you're discussing children that are overboard. If the kid pulls a gun or sells drugs, fine. Using an poorly secured computer system to have a prank is far from gang rape; to whit I'll still tag moronic in statement.

    91. Re:Must example set of him by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Homo-: 'same'
      phobia: 'an extreme or irrational fear of or aversion to something'

    92. Re: Must example set of him by TwoEyedJack · · Score: 1

      OK, next time you are driving one MPH over the limit, would you like to be thrown in jail and charged with a felony?

    93. Re: Must example set of him by mysidia · · Score: 1

      He wasn't charged with hacking. The charge was unauthorized access.

      The student had authorized access to the computing system. The student logged into the system with higher privileges without permission than the student was intended to access the system with -- using the credentials to another user's account which the student learned using lawful means (There was no surreptitious spying, keylogging, deceptive/fraudulent activity, or attacking of the computer system required to get access to the login used).

      No. This is the equivalent if locking the grade book away when the student knows where the key is. It's the changing of the grade that is wrong not the finding of the key.

      Ok, sure... the teacher locked the grade book away, then in plain sight of the students set the key on the desk, or left the key in the lock. The point is there is no 'breaking and entering' involved here.

      The teacher/staff of the school are totally complicit in any wrongdoing, due to inadequate supervision and improper precautions. If they expected to secure their accounts, they should have actually chosen a password for the Password field, instead of using their name: which all the students are told on 1st day of class, therefore the teacher actually indirectly disclosed her password on the 1st day of class, most likely.

      Except, the student didn't look at or change the grades; although the student in theory could have. Even if the student did change the grade... a criminal charge would be ridiculous. Just give the student an academic penalty and a disciplinary charge --- fail the course, suspended pending review by a disciplinary committee and possible expulsion.

    94. Re: Must example set of him by reve_etrange · · Score: 1

      Holding back transformative technological progress in order to protect established industries under the guise of "protecting" citizens is indeed no laughing matter...

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    95. Re: Must example set of him by magicandjewel · · Score: 1

      I agree with you and applaud the way you've played along with the joke that is Florida. Let me explain. Florida, that is, the area of the USA that we think of as Florida is a fiction. When I was a boy I was taught that Florida was the place where old Jews (of which I am one) go to die. When I was an adult the Bush/Gore election fiasco conclusively proved that was true. There is no there there. Florida is a fictitious territory invented by Philip K. Dick for one of his paranoid dystopian novels. The word is that Ridley Scott is quietly working on a movie about the imaginary state. Its working title is Epimetheus. What about all those maps of the USA that show a phallic projection down there? They're fictitious too. Florida is not real! get over it. [Incidentally, Texas isn't real either, which is far easier to demonstrate than what I'm saying here.] If such a place as Florida really existed then neither the fictitious antihero George Zimmerman nor this bizarre episode would have happened. If Florida hadn't already been invented by Philip K. Dick then Andy Borowitz would have invented the imaginary state by now. The other commenters are either fools, Republicans (okay, that was redundant), or also playing along with the joke. Now you know.

  2. Dumb and dumber by padrejohn · · Score: 1

    Who is Jeff and who is Jim.

  3. thank God they didn't have computers.... by OutOnARock · · Score: 5, Insightful

    when I was a kid

    the things I might have done....

    picking the mimeograph of the test out of the trash if its in public isn't even a criminal offense...

    1. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, but this isn't in public. The fact that they had easily learned the password and were regularly using it isn't the same as it being "in public".

      I don't think this should be a felony, but just because I leave my front door unlocked and slightly ajar doesn't give you permission to enter it.

      On the other hand, I don't know why schools are so quick to call the cops for something like this. Kids must do something at this level of annoying multiple times a day, every day. If they called the cops for every one of those, we'd have to move the classes to prison.

    2. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by sasquatch989 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, but if you leave your door unlocked and slightly ajar does give me the right to put a pic of two dudes kissing in your foyer

    3. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, but this isn't in public. The fact that they had easily learned the password and were regularly using it isn't the same as it being "in public".

      No, but where is the "crime"? where I live, a student messing with a background image might get some harsh words. Set it to something pornographic, and they might even get a lowered grade. Hacking in order to cheat on exams might get them expelled - but still no police involvment.

    4. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by jythie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The defense will probably (assuming it goes to trial) rest on the point that not only were the passwords public knowledge but were being used with the teacher's knowledge in other instances. To expand the analogy, it would be like keeping your key under a rock so any number of people can come in to feed your cat, but then one of those people scrawls something on the wall.

      'hacking' needs to have some lower bounds, and this sounds more like a case of simple vandalism then any kind of intrusion.

    5. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      So trespassing since you were uninvited?

      And yes, people who put flyers on door knobs are trespassing.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    6. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      we'd have to move the classes to prison.

      That's been happening for a while now. The pipeline is getting shorter and fatter.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    7. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually no it does not. That is called trespassing.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Not even that. More like one of those people hangs an ugly picture on the wall, which can easily be taken down. Worth a chewing out by the teacher, but not much else.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    9. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by thedonger · · Score: 1

      'hacking' needs to have some lower bounds, and this sounds more like a case of simple vandalism then any kind of intrusion.

      This isn't even close to hacking or any kind of computer crime. I'm surprised they didn't throw in hate crime charges for good measure.

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    10. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think this should be a felony, but just because I leave my front door unlocked and slightly ajar doesn't give you permission to enter it.

      It shouldn't even be a criminal charge. It may be a crime by the letter of the law, but c'mon, this couldn't be handled in-house?! A moronic stunt like this calls for in-school suspension with a few extra and tedious academic assignments. I can't decide what's more pathetic, the fact that the school couldn't handle this internally or the fact that law enforcement took the "case."

      Coming soon, the 2015 remake of The Breakfast Club; it begins with all four kids in handcuffs, charged with felonies for their misadventures, and ends with the parents bankrupted by legal fees while the kids lose any hope of becoming productive members of society.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    11. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by turkeyfish · · Score: 4, Funny

      You do't understand. The pick this kid posted suggested to them that he might grow up a Democrat. Soon he will be a felon and unable to vote. This is just one more aspect of many police state laws being put in place by the modern GOP and the shadow plutocrats that control it to make sure their grip on the public is complete.

      One doen't know whether to laugh or feel sorry for at all the right wing conspirator wackjobs, who are so busy protesting against the evils of "liberalism" and "socialism", that they haven't even noticed the plutocrats have inserted a rubber glove so far up their backsides that when the time comes all the plutocrats will have to do is to reach in and yank their hearts out.

    12. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by turkeyfish · · Score: 1

      Yes, but with compassionate conservatism we can expect prisons to soon open up "job centers", where the prisoners can work for free.

    13. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Nor does it give him the right to put his justin bieber cd on your dashboard.

      And for the record, I believe in the state of Texas this may be a capital offense.

    14. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 1
    15. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      It shouldn't even be a criminal charge.

      Well, if folks would calm down they'd realize that this is more likely just an attempt to scare the kid and set and example. So, they play this card for long enough, and that's the last time he or any of the other kids at school do this kind of thing, charges are dropped and the kid walks.

      But the parents or whoever had to go to the media, the media makes a big stink, and it becomes a mess.

    16. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by weilawei · · Score: 1

      Hey, if I'm the mailman, I can walk all the way up to your front door. Slipping the picture inside would be expected. My mailman leaves stuff in my mudroom to keep it out of the rain & dirt (sometimes bears).

      Granted, that doesn't apply to people who don't have a customary reason for being there. Police officer can chase a suspect without trespassing, mailman can come up to your door and slip stuff inside, building inspector can come inside for inspections as they wish, etc..

      A person who has contacted the local police station and registered as a solicitor is welcome to place flyers on your doorknob. There is no trespass in that instance. Many moons ago, I worked as a canvasser for a political organization, and walking onto private property was a big part of the job--but the entire team generally needed to register with the local police.

    17. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by omnichad · · Score: 2

      Depends on where you live. Putting flyers on the door knob is only trespassing if you have already told them not to be there, put up a no trespassing sign, or put up a no soliciting sign in most places. Otherwise, people can reasonably expect to be able to walk up to your front door.

      Pushing a photo through an open door isn't really trespassing either if you stay outside.

    18. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Shakrai · · Score: 2

      No, but where is the "crime"?

      The crime is using a password you didn't have permission to use to gain access to a computer account that a reasonable person would have known they would not entitled to access.

      Disclaimer: I am not justifying it, I think this is overreaction is patently stupid, I am just explaining what the underlying criminal offense is.

      I am surprised it's a felony level offense; I just pursued New York State's penal law and our most analogous offenses are both misdemeanors; I guess that's Florida for you. In New York you would have to access "computer material" (i.e., steal a file) to turn it into a felony, or be engaged in the commission of another felony while accessing the system without authorization.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    19. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Not in most states. People can reasonably expect to be able to walk up to your front door unless you have posted signs saying "no trespassing" or "no soliciting" or told the specific person that they are not allowed.

      Pushing a photo through an open door isn't really trespassing either if you stay outside.

    20. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I actually had this happen to me in 7th grade. Another student realized that we could use a password cracking program (I think windows would save pw files) to crack local user account passwords. First of all this is back in the days when windows 95 had horrific security such as storing user account passwords in a file that any user could access. :P And what would happen is that when you logged into Novell windows would often then prompt you for a local user account as well. And almost everybody would type in their their regular username and password to each machine. Well the other student cracked the schools system administrator's password and it was surprise surprise his first name plus like 123.

      So for the first time in known history at our school, we finally had several administrators who actually could manage the computers. We changed the desktop resolution from like 640x480 up to a "modern" 1024x768 on all of the machines. We were able to fix teacher machines which weren't working. The "system administrator" at our school's solution to everything was just format and re-install. Which is probably cost-effective for him but not ideal for teachers who would have to reinstall all of their software.

      We also had a little bit of fun, using remote desktop software on friends to trick them into thinking that Microsoft Word had a sentient chat bot that they had unlocked. Or moving a file around on their desktop when they were about to click on it so they would have to chase it around.

      Well the fun all came crashing down when the system administrator went on vacation and came back to notice that he had apparently "worked" throughout his vacation logging into various systems. My friend who initially cracked his password had been dumb enough to log in as himself, and then 2 seconds later as the admin, then back in as himself again. The admin perfectly sensibly went to the principle, who unfortunately though was 80 years old and completely clueless on technology. The admin filled the principle's heads with "felony hacking" and warned him that we could change our grades (We all had 4.0+ GPAs anyway so...) and also that we could change all of the accountant's books. Which might have been true but... which to me raised questions as to why the IT manager gave himself access to the entire school's accounting records. So the principle called us each in one by one. Told us (without a representative or parent) that we could either as 12 year olds consent to something like 80 hours of community service at the school over the next year or else they would press felony charges against us. We of course all started balling one by one and folded.

      After that the teachers would ask us to fix their computers because they but we just had to shrug our shoulders and say "sorry, the school says if we fix your computer we'll face felony charges." Needless to say the computers returned to their shitty unmaintained state. The principle apologized to us a couple years later and said he over-reacted.

    21. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Shakrai · · Score: 2

      Scaring the kid would end at putting him in the back of a patrol car in handcuffs and driving him to the station while sternly lecturing him about his life choices. I would have no problem with that and would in fact encourage it if I was his parents. To actually charge with him a felony though? That's absurd.

      Being charged with a felony will follow him forever, even if the charges are ultimately dismissed. Want a gun license? In many States (even gun friendly ones) you have to disclose arrests, not convictions. Want to apply for a security clearance? Same deal. Depending on the laws of your State you may have to disclose arrests for mundane job applications that don't involve security clearances or the like. Even if the records are sealed it'll still show up on a Google search if you made the police blotter.

      You can explain away the arrest -- I was charged with a felony at age 19 and it hasn't really impeded my life -- but what do you suppose happens if an employer or institute of higher education is looking at two otherwise equal candidates and one of them has an arrest record?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    22. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe they could just have the punishment fit the crime? When I was in school this would have meant bending over the Principal's desk and getting 5 swats with a piece of wood called a paddle. Now we're so much more civilized. Instead of bruising his ass cheeks we'll just ruin his entire fucking life. So much better.

    23. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Imagine if the students had intended actual mayhem instead of silly "graffiti"...

    24. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The school over reacted and it became a mess. Time to put the Principal on the unemployment line. The voters there need to take back their schools from the idiots they've left in charge.

    25. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Perhaps if the school hadn't been a bunch of asshats and called the cops, and if the cops hadn't been useless a-hole bullies and used absurb crime designations, this situation wouldn't exist...

      Parents had every right to bring this idiocy to light

    26. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This case, the woman who got 20 years for (possibly inducing) miscarriage, the guy who built a fort from cardboard boxes in his yard for his kids and was told by the city to remove it, all in the last few days -- I think they call for this quote from Jack Tramiel (of Commodore) when he asked how he could not hate Germans after having been in Auschwitz:

      "You know," he once told me, "it's hard to believe it really happened. But it can happen again. In America. Americans like to make rules, and that scares me. If you have too many rules you get locked in a system. It's the system that says this one dies and that one doesn't, not the people. That's why I don't hate the German people. Individuals, yes. Rules, yes. But not all Germans." He shrugged. "They just obeyed the rules. But that's why we need more Commodores. We need more mavericks, just so the rules don't take over."

    27. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by weilawei · · Score: 5, Informative

      You don't define who's trespassing on your property when they have a customary reason to be there. You can't take the mailman to court for trespassing, you can't take the police to court for chasing a suspect through your house and out a window, and you can't take a registered solicitor to court for trespassing (provided they leave as soon as you ask). If the fire department shows up with a reported emergency, they can bust in and there's not shit you can do about it. Building inspector? Same deal. Health inspector? Yep.

      A registered solicitor leaving a flyer is NOT considered littering. You cannot win that in court. Ever try to get rid of Jehovah's Witnesses? They always leave shit. Good luck.

      You don't define it. Trespassing is defined by the law, which allows you to take certain actions to encourage a certain set of people to leave, but it does not automatically mean that anyone who sets foot on your property is trespassing just because you don't like it.

      TL;DR: The world is more nuanced than your "LALALALA FINGERS IN EARS" view of things.

    28. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by lgw · · Score: 4, Funny

      My mailman leaves stuff in my mudroom to keep it out of the rain & dirt (sometimes bears).

      Yikes, your mailman sometimes leaves bears in your mudroom? You must have really pissed him off!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    29. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by weilawei · · Score: 1

      No, I leave the bears outside and the mailman hides stuff inside to keep it away from them. Occasionally the bears get curious and try to come inside, but I don't encourage it, and I don't think my mailman does.

    30. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      do not give them any ideas.

    31. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      The kid probably responded to authority in a similar manner....hence his situation.

    32. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Exactly what should have happened here. Look what the idiots made it into. They turned a kids prank into a terror alert. The people responsible should never be allowed anywhere near education of children again.

    33. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Were your charges dropped ? As I understand they do not stick with you if so. It may be different if for a 19 year old vs under 18. But if the charges stay no matter what, then I agree that would overdoing it as a scare tactic.

    34. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by weilawei · · Score: 1

      I'm going to confuse the question now.

      If I am standing outside a house, and I hear screaming (as in, sounds like someone is being stabbed to death screaming), am I trespassing (as an unqualified, ordinary civilian) if I set foot in the house to aid the presumably imminently-in-danger person?

      (Yes, I know this varies by jurisdiction, but what the hell..)

    35. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by mrbester · · Score: 1

      And now he has further reason to fear and distrust authority and the law. Congratulations, you've turned a kid into a felon. Now you've branded him to get fucked over for the rest of his life by banks and employers what choice does he have?

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    36. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by johnnys · · Score: 1

      No, the media should be asked to make a big stink about this, and the mind that can countenance that this is in any way a proper use of the system must be removed from any position of authority. A felony charge will follow that child around for the rest of his life. That is NOT acceptable.

      --
      Sometimes the "writing on the wall" is blood spatter...
    37. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by grumpy_old_grandpa · · Score: 1

      > If they called the cops for every one of those, we'd have to move the classes to prison.

      The moved the cops into the schools long time ago, so we're pretty much there already:
      http://www.theguardian.com/wor...

    38. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      Yes, but if you leave your door unlocked and slightly ajar does give me the right to put a pic of two dudes kissing in your foyer

      Might give him the right to kiss you in his foyer.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    39. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Why do you think most people don't do it?
      There are countless cases when a victim could have been saved if anyone would have interfered, nobody did.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    40. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      EXACTLY!

      This nonsense is just accelerating the trend of total disrespect for authority of any kind. Those in power never pay for their crimes, so why should anyone care or obey anything they say?

      Why do kids and other people hat e the cops and distrust them? Look to stories like this, same with teachers and other authority figures...

    41. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by war4peace · · Score: 1

      I would challenge this "no permission to use" assumption.
      If I were the student, I would have defended myself by saying "my home machine password is the same, i just tried it and it worked, what a coincidence!"

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    42. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      Cause no one thinks anymore, everyone is scared of a lawsuit.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    43. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      The defense will probably (assuming it goes to trial) rest on the point that not only were the passwords public knowledge but were being used with the teacher's knowledge in other instances.

      Where did you get this from? The student said that other students used the teachers' accounts, but nobody said they were doing it with the knowledge of the teachers or with their permission. Even with their permission may be unauthorized access, since I'm going to guess that the AUP for the systems involved prohibit account sharing. If they don't, they should.

      Here's what the fine article says about the intent of the student who was arrested:

      That's when he tried the other computer, which he realized was used by a teacher he didn't like, and realized that he could use his wide-reaching access to wreak some havoc.

      To expand the analogy, it would be like keeping your key under a rock so any number of people can come in to feed your cat, but then one of those people scrawls something on the wall.

      No, the analogy would be that you leave a key under a rock and then someone you haven't given permission to use the key or enter your house uses that key to enter your house with the intent to "wreak some havoc", but doesn't do much before he decides to leave.

      'hacking' needs to have some lower bounds,

      Were he charged with "hacking" you might have a point. "Unauthorized access to computer systems" does have a lower bound. Don't access a computer system without authorization and you're well below the lower bound.

    44. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      when I was a kid the things I might have done.... picking the mimeograph of the test out of the trash if its in public isn't even a criminal offense...

      Yeah, but back then they hadn't yet criminalized childhood like they have now.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    45. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      Not in most states. People can reasonably expect to be able to walk up to your front door unless you have posted signs saying "no trespassing" or "no soliciting" or told the specific person that they are not allowed.

      Pushing a photo through an open door isn't really trespassing either if you stay outside.

      A piss poor password is not the same as an open door, it is actually more like a door with a shitty lock. And bypassing a lock without permission, no matter how shitty it is, is breaking and entering pure and simple even if you do not do any damage.

      I am still very surprised this kid has been charged though. When I was at school most criminal offences on school grounds were brushed under the carpet in order not to embarrass the school. You could get even away with giving teachers decent wallop providing you didn't go to far and break their nose or anything. Likewise for hitting other students or stealing stuff.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    46. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by weilawei · · Score: 2

      About once every couple of weeks or so. You should've been there the night the bear ate goombaw.

      /apologies to Pat McManus

    47. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I wasn't talking about the metaphor. I was talking about walking up to an actual front door - where previous poster seriously thought that stepping onto someone else's property is already trespassing in all cases.

    48. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      A registered solicitor leaving a flyer is NOT considered littering. You cannot win that in court. Ever try to get rid of Jehovah's Witnesses? They always leave shit. Good luck.

      is there anywhere in the US where those little "NO SOLICITORS" signs are legally effective?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    49. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Vandalism is still vandalism. It's school property. Better get used to it.

    50. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Zero tolerance. It means administrators no longer have to think. It's like an algorithm: IF (cross the lin) THEN expell and prosecute END.
      The alternative in the past was to investigate and use discretion. Unfortunately that lead to unfair consequences; those labeled as potentional troublemakers got into much more trouble than the "good" students for the same offense; and minorities and poorer studetns were much more likely to be labeled as troublemakers. Wrong doings you did in kindergarten are still on your secret record in high school. Administrators were getting huge amount of flak for this and so many have decided on the zero tolerance policies.

      I'm not defending zero tolerance here, but this does seem to a major cause behind the zero tolerance trend.

    51. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by TJ_Phazerhacki · · Score: 1
      I got a 3 day suspension ~15 years ago because a group of us 'nerds' figured out admin access to the schools network, not because I used it, but because I gave the access to most of my entire class without them knowing about it to cover my tracks.

      I shudder to think what would have happened today...

      --
      Physics is nothing like religion. If it was, we'd have an easier time trying to raise money!
    52. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, if folks would calm down they'd realize that this is more likely just an attempt to scare the kid and set and example

      SO?! That's still NOT OKAY!

      What you've just described is a police state using tactics of fear and intimidation to subjugate the public. That's what you're defending here!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    53. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Doesn't every computer geek who grew up in the 90s have a story like that? As far as I'm concerned, benignly hacking your teacher is a completely normal and expect part of growing up!

      If all schools start reacting to that kind of thing like the one in TFA did, they really will need H1Bs because all the Americans who otherwise would have become developers will be in prison!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    54. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Is writing "DICK" on the chalkboard in your classroom considered vandalism? You know, you can just go over there and erase it, right? It might get you detention, but you shouldn't be arrested for it.

      The wallpaper on your PC is just a file stored on a magnetic disc, which is designed for reading AND writing. Removing the wallpaper is just as easy as erasing your chalkboard.

    55. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Phil+Urich · · Score: 1

      Doesn't every computer geek who grew up in the 90s have a story like that? As far as I'm concerned, benignly hacking your teacher is a completely normal and expect part of growing up!

      If all schools start reacting to that kind of thing like the one in TFA did, they really will need H1Bs because all the Americans who otherwise would have become developers will be in prison!

      Yup, I have very similar stories myself, although personally I mostly used it just to go over the print limit.

      --
      I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
    56. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Were your charges dropped ? As I understand they do not stick with you if so. It may be different if for a 19 year old vs under 18. But if the charges stay no matter what, then I agree that would overdoing it as a scare tactic.

      Legally, the charges (and, maybe even the arrest record) might disappear (depends on the state) if dropped, but any details that were reported in the media will stick around. Similarly, the "seal" on juvenile records is only a legal matter, not a media matter.

      --
      Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
    57. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by digsbo · · Score: 1

      I impressed the principal had the decency to apologize. He was probably a good guy, all in all, who panicked due to realizing there were things going on he could not understand or control.

    58. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      See Good Samaritan law for your viewing area.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    59. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by mtrachtenberg · · Score: 1

      "we'd have to move the classes to prison"

      Hey! Wouldn't that be great for the GDP, especially if the prison were private?!

    60. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Wrong.

      It's a crime. It's a computer crime, and you're supposed to know that.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    61. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Pyrion · · Score: 1

      I had something similar happen in high school as well - same era of computing technology, but my "crime" was using the Back Orifice client on a terminal in CAD class and discovering that a good chunk of the school's network had been infected with it. Attempting to convince the district's administrator that a problem existed at all got me a "we have antivirus, we're fine" response (their solution for everything was the same as yours - reformat and reinstall), and when I pressed the issue with the school's administration I was given a more detailed answer of "fixing it isn't in the budget."

      So I forced the issue, by using the client to display popup messages on several terminals in my Internet Publishing class, with the teacher in full view of what was going on. Got pulled aside and "reported" to the administration, and he made all kinds of noise about "port scans are a felony" which I couldn't help but laugh at, considering he ultimately had to use the BO client himself to remove the infection. The school administration wanted to expel me and sweep the problem under the rug, but they basically had to settle for assigning me one session of Saturday School after discovering that I had never signed the liability waiver the district required of every student prior to using their computers (I was handed one, I stuck it in my backpack and promptly forgot about it), and neither my CAD teacher nor my Internet Publishing teacher bothered to enforce collecting the damn things.

      The start of the second semester that year was telling, because the school had its campus police lock every computer lab and basically force every student, for each class period, to sign a liability waiver and return it before they'd let anyone in.

      Story doesn't end there though - fast forward a year and change, over the summer the school spent a huge amount of money having one of the computer graphics classes upgraded, with something on the order of 20-some iMacs and 4 G3's. Barely a semester later, somebody broke into the lab, ripped most of the memory out of each machine, and reconfigured the virtual memory settings so that the theft wouldn't be noticed immediately. And it wasn't. Take a wild guess who their first suspect was.

      Getting pulled out of class by two uniformed police officers was fun, though nothing came of that, or their investigation, as far as I know. The school didn't get reimbursed by their insurance company either, because the computers had anti-theft locks installed but none of them were actually armed.

      --
      "There is much pleasure to be gained from useless knowledge." - Bertrand Russell.
    62. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by reve_etrange · · Score: 1

      See Good Samaritan law

      What's funny about these is that many of them coexist with legal precedent establishing that the police have no duty to protect citizens. So in New York for example, cops have no requirement to interfere, but ordinary citizens can be guilty of a crime if they do not.

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    63. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Your assumption has no basis.

    64. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      No, what I described is giving a kid a little dose of reality and a chance to realize that actions have consequences. Too bad if you can't appreciate that important life lesson. It may be the best thing that ever happened to him, or he may ignore it and continue getting into trouble. Don't think for a minute this is his first run in.

    65. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      A felony charge will follow that child around for the rest of his life.

      Not if it is dropped.

    66. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by BonThomme · · Score: 1

      In the 80's I almost got kicked out of college for accessing the internet (BITNET, actually).

    67. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Informative

      I can only speak for New York State; in NYS when charges are dropped/dismissed or the defendant acquitted you receive a canned "Order of Dismissal" from the court. This order provides that:

      1. Records of the arrest held at the State level are sealed in almost all instances, with specified exemptions, one of which is pistol license applications. Apply for a NYS pistol license and they can and will obtain the sealed records.
      2. All copies of fingerprints taken by the State are ordered to be destroyed or returned to the defendant.
      3. The State Court asks the Feds to destroy any copies of records transmitted to them by the State of New York after your arrest.

      The astute observer will note the bolded part of #3; virtually all local/state arrests in the United States are reported to the FBI by your State's clearinghouse. In New York State it's the Division of Criminal Justice Services. They usually transmit your fingerprints to the Feds too. If you think the Feds are deleting these records because some State Court asks (not orders) them to I've got a bridge to sell you.....

      For what it's worth, the FBI won't disclose records in most instances, except to the applicable parties (i.e., you, via a FOIA request), so it's not something that will show up on a private background check. It will show up as part of any Federal background investigation (i.e., for a security clearance) and is almost certainly made available to State and Local law enforcement authorities.

      Another thing to keep in mind: If you're asked whether or not you've ever been arrested and choose to lie about it you may well have committed a crime, depending on the circumstances. A verbal lie to a private citizen or employer? Most likely not a crime. A written lie, i.e., an employment application? In New York State it could be considered a forged instrument.

      The other hole that exists is the public record. If you make the police blotter in the local paper it's almost certainly going to go online and get captured by Google. At that point there isn't a court in the world that's powerful enough to make it go away. The United States has no right to be forgotten, so that shit is going to be out there for your entire life, available to anyone who is smart enough to look for it.

      In my particular case I was lucky, the police had it in their heads that I had information on co-conspirators, and they very deliberately kept it out of the blotter hoping that I would roll on them. The only records that exist of my arrest are held in Albany and Washington, available only under select circumstances, and I've yet to come across an employment application that asks about arrests. Most only care about convictions, and I answer "No" to that question in good faith.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    68. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      If I were the student, I would have defended myself by saying "my home machine password is the same, i just tried it and it worked, what a coincidence!"

      You've got a 1 in 10,000 chance of that working with my ATM card; let me know if that legal defense passes muster if you drain my account and get caught.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    69. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Any+Web+Loco · · Score: 1

      It's funny because it's true!

    70. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by linuxrocks123 · · Score: 1
      --
      vi ~/.emacs # I'm probably going to Hell for this.
    71. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      interesting. Thanks

    72. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      I think the problem here is that teachers are not technically literate as the kids (my wife is a teacher, I work in IT so am very familiar with this type of thing).
      So the kid has unauthorised access to a computer system, which may or may not have personal and or sensitive information on it. The school has a duty to report it in case of the worst case scenario (what if it was an actual breach and they didn't report it? Can't win).
      What causes this is that school or Dept has no resources to address this themselves (Tax cuts! Yee haa!), so rely on an equally underfunded Police dept to help out. The cops are in the same boat, and are only doing what their underfunding allows them. Underfunding generally results in undertrained staff, which is the cause of most stupid decisions).
      So the root cause is politics on both sides always selling tax cuts for votes. Quality services cost money. And money comes from taxes. If you want better services at some point we have to be prepared to pay for it.

    73. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure the school over-reacted. They are not computer experts, how do they know if there isn't something more serious going on? What if the kid changed school reports, and then changed the wall paper? That would be a felony, and therefore only course of action the school has is to report it to ensure their liability is covered. Now whether the police proceed with charges is another matter, but I can't see how the school has much choice (unless the dept has it's own computer security team on-call for internal investigations - which I highly doubt)

    74. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      What you've just described is a police state using tactics of fear and intimidation to subjugate the public. That's what you're defending here!

      No it isn't. There's no police state, and no subjugation, there is a repeat offender with a history who can continue down their course of behaviour, or can be "scared straight" with a little applied pressure. It's a common tactic that has been used for centuries. I've been on that road myself so know first hand of it's effectiveness.

    75. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      this quote from Jack Tramiel (of Commodore)
      But that's why we need more Commodores.

      Sorry but what are you talking about? The only context I know of "Commodore" is a band with Lionel Ritchie, a big cheese in a navy, or a shit car made in Australia. But none of these work here?

    76. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by nctritech · · Score: 1

      The computer company that beat the pants off both Apple and IBM in the home computer market throughout all of the 1980s and the start of the 1990s until Tramiel left (and then it all went to shit due to gross mismanagement). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    77. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Oh that Commodore! When you said we need more Commodores I assumed it was some group of people. How would more computers help?

    78. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by nctritech · · Score: 1

      He was quoting Jack Tramiel, the founder of Commodore International. Commodore's computers enjoyed over a decade of success against Apple and IBM as well as the game systems of the late 1970s through early 1980s because they were unorthodox and clever with their marketing (Commodore computers were sold at toy stores in the same display cases as electronic game consoles, for example), they ruthlessly found ways to cut prices, and they didn't even bother trying to be the next IBM. Commodore was successful because they didn't play in the boundaries of the established computer and electronics industries. That's what the point of the statement was.

    79. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Ok got it now. Brain engaged, hamsters are slowly turning the wheels...

    80. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      See Good Samaritan law

      What's funny about these is that many of them coexist with legal precedent establishing that the police have no duty to protect citizens. So in New York for example, cops have no requirement to interfere, but ordinary citizens can be guilty of a crime if they do not.

      I have never heard of a requirement that bystanders interfere. But it is quite true that the Police do not have any requirement to protect individual citizens. (Contrary to popular opinion!)

      For one thing, in the US it is assumed that citizens can protect themselves, at least long enough for the Police to get there. For another, it is impractical because the Police would be sued after every crime and would have no time to protect anyone.

      The actual job of the Police is to arrest criminals -after- the crime. Most Police try to protect people as best they can, but they can't be everywhere.

      There are places where the Police are tasked with protecting everyone, they are technically called "Police States". And it is generally agreed around the world that no one really wants to live in a Police State.

    81. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by PPalmgren · · Score: 1

      I finally got around to watching The Blind Side last night, good movie. There's a funny quip near the end where they're hiring a tutor, and before she's hired she admits to being a democrat, like it would immediately take her out of hiring possibilities (this took place in Mississippi). Later on, the parents joke with each other in "Who thought we'd have a black son before we were friends with a Democrat?" I got a good laugh out of it.

    82. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by Shadowkahn · · Score: 1

      That's a bit hyperbolic. If you catch a little kid swiping a toy from a store, and you scare the hell out of him by making him think the angry cop is going to haul him off to jail where he can't be with his mommy and daddy, you aren't using fear and intimidation to subjugate the public, you're using fear and intimidation to hopefully stop the kid from thinking that stealing is fun and profitable, and therefore hopefully keep him from becoming a more serious criminal down the road and ending up in jail.

      I would argue that breaking and entering and then just looking around and maybe leaving funny souvenirs behind, whether they're breaking into a physical house or a computer, is not something that should be encouraged.

      In a real-world analogue, the kid found the teacher's house key and instead of returning it to him or throwing it in the trash, used it to let himself in to the teacher's house and rearrange the furniture. That's not okay either.

      The overreaction was stupid, and I agree with an earlier poster who asked why schools call the cops for shit like this so much, but the kid should not have gotten off without consequences - just, those consequences should have been dished out by the school instead of the criminal prosecution system.

    83. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by reve_etrange · · Score: 1

      I have never heard of a requirement that bystanders interfere.

      I accidentally conflated Good Samaritan laws with duty to rescue, and apparently misremembered New York as an example. Such laws do exist in several states however.

      There are places where the Police are tasked with protecting everyone, they are technically called "Police States".

      Police state is a term denoting government that exercises power arbitrarily through the police. There has never been such a state, which tasked its police with "protecting everyone."

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    84. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      There are places where the Police are tasked with protecting everyone, they are technically called "Police States".

      Police state is a term denoting government that exercises power arbitrarily through the police. There has never been such a state, which tasked its police with "protecting everyone."

      That is the popular meaning, but keep in mind that wikipedia is neither complete nor always accurate. (After all, it is on the Internet!) 8-)

      The idea of protecting everyone all of the time is often the "wedge" that is used to start the totalitarian states. It is an excuse, of course. At least for some of those proposing it. But countries would not be "suckered into" such things if they did not think they were gaining something benificial.

      I was going by the "technical" meaning of the term.

    85. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by reve_etrange · · Score: 1

      The idea of protecting everyone all of the time is often the "wedge" that is used to start the totalitarian states.

      Can you name one where this was true? In Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union and China, political control and ideological purity were the motivation and the wedge.

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    86. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      The idea of protecting everyone all of the time is often the "wedge" that is used to start the totalitarian states.

      Can you name one where this was true? In Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union and China, political control and ideological purity were the motivation and the wedge.

      There was also the idea that the police control was acceptable because they would protect everyone, and that was "why" they needed extrodinary powers. No government comes into control without some reason to placate the people, unless it is a foreign invasion. And some times even then. After all, the people outnumber the government "want-to-be's".

    87. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by reve_etrange · · Score: 1

      In Nazi Germany, people accepted totalitarian rule because of economic growth, low unemployment and resurgent nationalism. In China and USSR, there was growth, redistribution and nationalist fervor. Extraordinary police powers were viewed as costs worth accepting in light of the real progress that had occurred.

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    88. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by thedonger · · Score: 1

      Wrong.

      It's a crime. It's a computer crime, and you're supposed to know that.

      By the letter of the law it is a computer crime, but by intention it is an act of vandalizing a computer. Those are two very different things. If he looked up test answers, changed grades, or altered attendance records, then I would accept it as a computer crime. This is an instance of blind application of a law.

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    89. Re:thank God they didn't have computers.... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Your first sentence does describe the law.

      The rest of your paragraph is nonsense.

      It's important that you protect yourself and your employer, your coworkers and your students.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  4. Insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can we just give Florida back to Spain or something?

    1. Re:Insanity by OhSoLaMeow · · Score: 5, Funny

      And what state do you live in?

      Denial.

      --
      They can take my LifeAlert pendant when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
    2. Re:Insanity by scrib · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I live in Florida and this embarrasses me.
      However, I think giving Florida back to Spain might fix the problem. I don't think this is a Florida problem as much as a U.S. problem. In this country, we criminalize everything and take common sense out of the picture.

      --
      Help! Help! I'm being repressed!
    3. Re:Insanity by schwit1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      THE problem is a lack of consequences when government officials act like asshats ... unless one of them shoots a guy in the back 8 times.

    4. Re:Insanity by charles84 · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, we don't want it. All transactions are final.

    5. Re:Insanity by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      let's check in on the adventures of Floridaman , champion of the people.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    6. Re:Insanity by turkeyfish · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, with a 6 ft sea level rise expected within 50-75 years much of Miami and the coastal cities in Florida will be inundated, so this problem will largely take care of itself. The irony is that all those mansions in Palm Beach will be among the first to go.

    7. Re:Insanity by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      You can take Florida out of the States, but you can't take the States out of Florida. Moving it to Spanish control wouldn't fix anything, since half the population will still be snowbirds.

    8. Re:Insanity by CannonballHead · · Score: 4, Funny

      Everyone knows Denial isn't a state, it's a river.

    9. Re:Insanity by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      unless one of them shoots a guy in the back 8 times.

      The arrest wouldn't happen still if there was no video of him shooting (i.e. using only the video from police car's dashboard).

    10. Re:Insanity by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      Think of the children.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    11. Re:Insanity by sconeu · · Score: 1

      To be fair, I'm willing to be Californiaman, if it keeps Kim Kardashian and Kanye West out of California!!!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    12. Re:Insanity by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, with a 6 ft sea level rise expected within 50-75 years much of Miami and the coastal cities in Florida will be inundated, so this problem will largely take care of itself. The irony is that all those mansions in Palm Beach will be among the first to go.

      How much do you want to bet that those mansions get relocated to higher ground at public expense because the owners have $$$? It will be a bail-out to keep them from having to bail out their mansions 24/7.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  5. Abusive authority breeds abusers, not obedience by Art+Popp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The question every person in authority should be in the habit of asking is: "Am I using the least amount of my authority possible to accomplish my immediate goals?"

    To get a peace officer badge, A Clockwork Orange should be mandatory viewing with a discussion to follow, and an arrest for not understanding it. I think peace officers who don't understand the point of that movie are at least as likely to commit serious crimes as 8th graders who tamper with screen savers. I'm willing to be proven wrong.

    1. Re:Abusive authority breeds abusers, not obedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      These are K-12 schools, which are chronically underfunded, so the top tier teachers move the heck on when they can.

      The only thing that is funded with most of these schools is the "schools to prisons" pathway. This is because private prisons make a lot of cash hauling and storing teenagers... and the Florida juvi system doesn't allow for determinate sentences. The private jails decide to either let the kids out when they feel like it, or when the kid turns 23... usually the latter.

      Of course, a 23 year kid with zero job skills and only bars to look at will likely wind up back behind bars... but with adult crimes, so it means more money for the private prisons.

    2. Re:Abusive authority breeds abusers, not obedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There are people who have seen this pattern and are doing something about it:

      http://www.seattletimes.com/se...

      I'm hoping the numbers prove that it can be expanded to the many other places where simply jailing the offender doesn't make the world a better place.

    3. Re:Abusive authority breeds abusers, not obedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And I in turn think that people who do not know the difference between wallpaper and a screen saver should not be allowed to use computers. Or at the very least should not be granted administrator privileges.

    4. Re:Abusive authority breeds abusers, not obedience by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      There are long range goals as well, and in some cases it may be worth trying to "scare straight" a teenager by hauling him off in a police cruiser and reading him the riot act down at the station. In this case, it should stop short of actually bringing those charges.

      Suppose your neighbour's kid notices you often leave the back door unlocked when you leave for a short errant, so next time you step out he:
      1) Sneaks in and leaves a turd on the dinner table
      2) Sneaks in and steals your wife's fresh baked apple pie
      3) Sneaks in and makes off with your new iPad.

      The 1st case is pretty innocent, the 2nd not so much and the 3rd is pretty serious. So you grab him the first time and make it abundantly clear that he'll be in a whole mess of trouble if it comes to case #3 (not to mention he might spook grandma and get both barrels of her 12 gauge, to name another possible consequence). Same with computer crime. Using a teacher's password is serious. The consequence for changing a screen background should be a stern warning, and nothing less, because next time he'll be after next week's test papers.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    5. Re:Abusive authority breeds abusers, not obedience by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      I'm with you, it's still unauthorized access.

        I think the kid should be charced with something like "Criminal Mischief" and should recieve "community service" with a suspended short juvenile detention (say a weekend) term on condition of not violating terms of that suspension. That should be enough of a "scared straight" incentive.

      He's 14, that's old enough to know better, or at least know to NOT put a "two guys" background and use Rickroll or grumpycat instead.

    6. Re:Abusive authority breeds abusers, not obedience by sjames · · Score: 2

      Actually, followup studies suggest that the scared straight approach leads to more offenses in the future.

      A juvenile prank (and that's all this was) calls for the more conventional consequences such as detention, writing an essay, note to parents and such. Perhaps a suggestion in the parent's note that they should change the kid's wallpaper to "Barney and Friends" for a week.

    7. Re:Abusive authority breeds abusers, not obedience by njnnja · · Score: 2

      I think you have the ordering wrong. If someone defecated on my dinner table I would never eat off that table again. He might as well have set fire to it. And since the table is worth more than the iPad, I think the first scenario is actually the worst.

      It seems like a small thing, but it does highlight how something like theft is easy to judge the seriousness of; namely, stealing a $2 candy bar isn't as bad as stealing a $20 shirt, which isn't as bad as stealing a $20,000 car. But sometimes it can be difficult to judge the damage of vandalism, and the vandal almost always thinks it is a smaller deal than the vandalized. So let's say someone is going to slash somebody's tire. The vandal might think that it is no big deal, like a $50 tire that needs to be replaced. But the vandalized is thinking "I'm going to be late to work to deal with this, so I'm losing pay, and I have to make sure that the tire salesman gives me a good price on an equivalent tire, etc etc"

      Having said all that, it certainly seems like calling the police for this particular incident of vandalism is way overkill, but (playing devil's advocate a little), what if the administration is totally technologically ignorant, and think that this kind of situation requires a $300/hour consultant to come in and "clean" the "infected" machine? Stupid people have all types of higher costs, and if you make them incur those costs, they will blame you, not themselves.

    8. Re:Abusive authority breeds abusers, not obedience by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      If someone defecated on my dinner table I would never eat off that table again.

      Really why? I mean you know we have things like disinfectants and such that would make it entirely safe right? A little soap water, and some elbow grease to clean it, then follow it with a little Lysol (which probably from a health stand point isn't even needed) and it should be cleaner and more germ free than before there was a turd on it.

      Have you ever been around small children or had sick pet? If your standard is must dispose of anything that has even been in contact with fecal matter must be disposed of you had better avoid both pets and children or be prepared to replace all your furniture several times over.

      That said I would much my ordering of things would be:
      Pie theft
      Turd leaving
      iPad theft

      I mean Pie's are cheap and easy to make. If the wife does not feel like making another we can just go get ice-cream or something. Occasionally turds have to be cleaned up, that comes with life and I can handle it, but I'd rather bake a pie. The iPad is pretty pricy.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    9. Re:Abusive authority breeds abusers, not obedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Since you were a fan of some sort of moderation, I'll conceded the point that an experiment to see if "scared straight" will ever actually save ANYONE from a criminal career will ever work. I'd be willing to give it a try.

      Your examples are all significantly greater crimes than typing 10 characters on a keyboard and a couple mouse-clicks. If the article had read: Kid gets 3 detentions for changing teacher's background image, I think the slashdot crowd would have been saying: "Kid, stop doing that." But the idea that a truly harmless prank that gets played at school gets police attention seems like a symptom of the same prejudice against hacking-skills that the /. community has grown tired of seeing.

    10. Re:Abusive authority breeds abusers, not obedience by njnnja · · Score: 1

      I have kids and a cat and yes, mistakes have been made. But a dining room table? I guess it depends on the table. Mine doesn't have a good sealant so if you were to drop oil or food coloring on it it would definitely stain. And while I can live with a hairball stain on the carpet, I wouldn't want to live with a s#*! stain on the table where I eat.

    11. Re:Abusive authority breeds abusers, not obedience by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      So as long as I don't do anything 'considered' malicious to a system I'm not supposed to access, I should be given a pass?

      When you're a damn middle-school kid? Yes!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    12. Re:Abusive authority breeds abusers, not obedience by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      There really really needs to be some more direct enforcement of the Constitution. We do, after all, already have a rule (as the highest law of the land) forbidding cruel and unusual punishment.

      The world would be a much better place if assholes who unconstitutionally try to ruin a child's life forever for changing a desktop background, could be punished for their crime.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    13. Re:Abusive authority breeds abusers, not obedience by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Actually, followup studies suggest that the scared straight approach leads to more offenses in the future.

      Well it must be true then. Because you said right here, without the need for a citation or anything...

    14. Re:Abusive authority breeds abusers, not obedience by sjames · · Score: 1

      FOADIAF

  6. I probably would've gotten the death penalty... by Dimwit · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hah. On the Windows 3.1 systems at my high school I would change the screensaver message to something like "FUCK THA POLICE" or whatever and then use the ATTRIB command to mark WIN.INI as read-only, meaning it was impossible to change the message back using the UI.

    --
    ...but it's being eaten...by some...Linux or something...
    1. Re:I probably would've gotten the death penalty... by rjforster · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Windows logo in the Flying Windows screensaver was from the Wingdings font. Using Wordpad you could edit the screensaver binary and change the character that gets displayed to another one from that font. So at various times in the Win3.1 era people around me were found to have flying smiley faces, flying skull and crossbones etc.

    2. Re:I probably would've gotten the death penalty... by avandesande · · Score: 1

      How about the 'Hot Dog Stand' theme? That was handy too!

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    3. Re:I probably would've gotten the death penalty... by SoCalChris · · Score: 4, Funny

      Back in Windows 3.1, you could use qbasic to write a file with a non-standard filename, which would exceed the 8.3 format.

      8th grader me thought it was the height of comedy to write files with names like "[Teacher name] is dumb" to the desktop.

      Any attempt to remove or rename the file using the command line or UI would cause Windows to crap all over itself and crash.

    4. Re:I probably would've gotten the death penalty... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I had a teacher that threatened to have me banned from the computer lab for playing games running off a floppy disk when my classwork was done.

      Sometimes it makes you wonder how they decide who runs the labs.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    5. Re:I probably would've gotten the death penalty... by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      The teacher, not you. How could s/he be sure you weren't importing viruses without wasting time each time checking after you were found out?

    6. Re:I probably would've gotten the death penalty... by Dimwit · · Score: 2

      How about the 'Hot Dog Stand' theme? That was handy too!

      I was mischievous, not evil!

      --
      ...but it's being eaten...by some...Linux or something...
    7. Re:I probably would've gotten the death penalty... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      But without needing a password, it's not a violation of CFAA is it?

    8. Re:I probably would've gotten the death penalty... by Toshito · · Score: 2

      I used to swap the boot and shutdown pictures on my co-worker's computers back when we had win95.

      It was funny to see them panic when the computer was booting up and the message said "shutting down"...

      --
      Try it! Library of Babel
    9. Re:I probably would've gotten the death penalty... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I went to an NT4 training with a bunch of fellow employees and I have this nasty habit of reading notes ahead while I'm bored. The first job was remote registry editing. But for my target, I picked someone who had a sense of humor...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:I probably would've gotten the death penalty... by sad_ · · Score: 1

      I just changed the wallpaper to the most horrible picture i could find on rotten.com, then watch from a distance as the first person logs in and...
      aaah, good times.

      --
      On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  7. Rare arguement for jury nullification by davidwr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's rare that a jury should exercise "jury nullification" but cases like these, where the punishment does not fit the crime, are one of them.

    Acquitting a guilty person when the charge is over-the-top for the circumstances sends a loud message to prosecutors to dial-it-back to something sane the next time around.

    If there wasn't a history of other students doing the same thing, filing misdemeanor criminal charges in juvenile court with a pre-arranged deal where they charges would be dismissed and the arrest expunged within 1-2 years would not be inappropriate.

    Because there is such a history, even this is too much. This should have been handled as an internal disciplinary and/or re-training matter for the student and, in parallel, for the faculty so this kind of thing doesn't happen again.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Rare arguement for jury nullification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think to it shows a complete disconnect from what computers are and the seriousness of what the student did.

      If a teacher were to leave a spare set of keys to the Teacher Lounge under a mat and students saw this. Then some of students sneaked in and stole some coffee, etc. And one student sneaked in and changed one of the boring motivational posters to one of two men kissing. That would be the physical world equivalent of this crime!! No one in their right mind would charge the student with federal burglar charges.

      If this goes to court, Am hoping a several lawyers will write as a friend of the court with something like the above.

    2. Re:Rare arguement for jury nullification by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 2
      Very true.

      When did our schools become police states. I don't ever remember even seeing a police officer at my high school /*mumble*/ years ago (Now get off my grass). Now the schools have police officers on the property as an assignment, and trivial things like this become fully punishable by the state. What is wrong with two weeks suspension (Which I still think is heavy for a simple student prank) without needing to get the police involved and the threat of being arrested and tried as an adult (at 14 - really?)

      So yes, handle it as an internal school disciplinary issue, and don't have the police or local government get involved at all... There is no need to ruin children's lives at such a young age

      --
      I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
    3. Re:Rare arguement for jury nullification by flaming+error · · Score: 1

      " filing misdemeanor criminal charges in juvenile court with a pre-arranged deal where they charges would be dismissed and the arrest expunged within 1-2 years would not be inappropriate."

      What the hell are you smoking? It's a stupid classroom prank. Nothing that deserves to be called a crime happened here.

      If you cage kids up for 6 hours a day, they're going to test the fences. This is healthy and natural. Well, testing the fences is. The forced incarceration, not so much.

      And who cares if it ever happens again?

    4. Re:Rare arguement for jury nullification by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      The first time he was caught according to the article he was suspended for three days, this time suspended for ten days and then pressed charges. From the article it sounds like after suspending him the first time they didn't change the password. Chances are he will be given a pretrial intervention and if he completes the program the charges will be dropped and not appear on his record.

    5. Re:Rare arguement for jury nullification by WaffleMonster · · Score: 2

      It's rare that a jury should exercise "jury nullification" but cases like these, where the punishment does not fit the crime, are one of them.

      What is even rarer these days is the jury trial. With evolution of threat of insane sentences looming and nonsensical cost of litigation even the completely innocent dare not risk ignoring plea deals and settlement.

      Acquitting a guilty person when the charge is over-the-top for the circumstances sends a loud message to prosecutors to dial-it-back to something sane the next time around.

      Blemishing the record of a prosecutor constitutes a high crime against god that will not be tolerated under any circumstance.

    6. Re:Rare arguement for jury nullification by Phil+Urich · · Score: 1

      I don't ever remember even seeing a police officer at my high school /*mumble*/ years ago (Now get off my grass).

      And even the grass has gotten more extreme since then.

      --
      I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
    7. Re:Rare arguement for jury nullification by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

      If there wasn't a history of other students doing the same thing, filing misdemeanor criminal charges in juvenile court with a pre-arranged deal where they charges would be dismissed and the arrest expunged within 1-2 years would not be inappropriate.

      What are you smoking?

      Criminal charges are NOT appropriate for most juvenile behavior. Unless they're ganging up and physically attacking an adult, for example, you deal with it in a much less permanent way. Minor (unarmed, no injuries) Fighting in school once? Talk to them. Twice? Do push-ups until it's out of their system. Three times? Make them mop up the gym for a week.

      They are RARELY appropriate for adult behavior, even when it crosses the line of legality. They can seriously mess up someone's life. You usually should not bring criminal charges unless it's necessary to protect someone's life or safety.

    8. Re:Rare arguement for jury nullification by davidwr · · Score: 1

      Jury nullification shouldn't be rare because of all the bogus laws that exist.

      Or, "Jury nullification should be rare because the circumstances that would justify it should be rare."

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    9. Re:Rare arguement for jury nullification by doug141 · · Score: 1

      Sometimes, the judge denies the right to jury nullification: http://billmoyers.com/segment/...

  8. Well, yeah... by jargonburn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Obviously, he should have set it to a photo of two women kissing. Then the teacher wouldn't have been so mad!

    1. Re:Well, yeah... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, it could have been 400 frogs in elaborate animatronic costumes ... but why the hell would we assume that?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Well, yeah... by bughunter · · Score: 1

      Considering all the possibilities of what he *could* have changed it to, I think he showed admirable restraint...

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    3. Re:Well, yeah... by geogob · · Score: 1

      Obviously, he should have set it to a screenshot of the desktop. Fun times are sure to follow...

  9. Felony hacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    More serious than misdemeanor manslaughter.

    1. Re:Felony hacking by jythie · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe and maybe not. Even at the federal level such violations can result in a simple fine or probation depending on the severity of the offense and criminal history of the person in question. Involuntary manslaughter on the other hand generally has minimums in the year range.

    2. Re:Felony hacking by SoCalChris · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except with a felony conviction he'll automatically lose rights for life, and will have a much harder time getting a decent job once he's out of school.

    3. Re:Felony hacking by jythie · · Score: 1

      Not as much as one might think, esp if the person was a juvenile at the time. Though yeah, if they go through with this it could represent a rather long lived stain for the person. I am skeptical they would actually prosecute it as a federal crime though and probably scare the family into some kind of plea bargain involving community service and probation.

    4. Re:Felony hacking by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      Green was released on Wednesday from Land O'Lakes Detention Center into the custody of his mother. He'll likely be granted pretrial intervention by a judge, sheriff's detective Anthony Bossone said.

      Since he is a juvenile if he has no prior record he will likely qualify for a pretrial intervention that doesn't require them to make a plea and if completed the charges are dropped and don't appear on the record.

  10. True Justice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Finally, we are teaching our children that justice is truly blind. It cannot see that we are charging the child, a 14 year-old, with a felony that will last the rest of his life. Never mind any jobs that the kid may try to get in the future. He is now a felon and shall be treated as such.

    Seriously though. He is just a child. I believe in making sure it is shown that what he did was wrong, but treating him as a full blown felon? Disgraceful.

  11. Common Sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That whoosh you heard was the last bit of common sense leaving the US's shores. Not that there has been much of it in the last couple of decades (almost none of it, really).

  12. Ignorant people frighten easily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One time, I used a command prompt instruction to circumvent the 'security' our high school computer lab teacher had used to prevent students from accessing the Control Panel in Windows 3.1. The mouse tracking speed had been set too high, and the computer was difficult to use, so I fixed it. The teacher accused me of "hacking" and I was kicked out of the computer lab for the rest of the school year. That teacher probably still runs a computer lab; I grew up and went to work for Microsoft. I hope this kid is as lucky.

    1. Re:Ignorant people frighten easily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I grew up and went to work for Microsoft. I hope this kid is as lucky.

      How can you be so callous -- this kid is just a kid!!!

    2. Re:Ignorant people frighten easily by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

      One time, I used a command prompt instruction to circumvent the 'security' our high school computer lab teacher had used to prevent students from accessing the Control Panel in Windows 3.1. The mouse tracking speed had been set too high, and the computer was difficult to use, so I fixed it. The teacher accused me of "hacking" and I was kicked out of the computer lab for the rest of the school year. That teacher probably still runs a computer lab; I grew up and went to work for Microsoft. I hope this kid is as lucky.

      We had some kind of educational shell preventing you from running programs or getting to explorer, etc... on our high school computers. We found it hysterical that you could "insert an object" into a Word document. The object could be explorer.exe

      And there was SimTower and XCom. And there was much rejoicing.

  13. AUP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most acceptable use policies would require the teacher to understand that actions taken with his credentials are his responsibility. As the teachers own password was used, he or she should bear the responsibilities of the action.

    1. Re:AUP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're assuming the teacher can change the password. You may not have very much experience with IT departments at schools. The IT person should never allow silly passwords like this. No way it's the teacher's fault.

    2. Re:AUP by turkeyfish · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You don't understand. The photo that was placed on the screen clearly indicates this kid could grow up to be a Democrat. It is essential the felony charges stick so that this kids voting rights will be permanently eliminated.

  14. Bias in article? Or sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sheriff Nocco seems to be taking this threat seriously.

    This "threat". How refreshing would it be if Sheriff Nocco appropriately laughed at the teacher, said they had both done worse as kids, and lightly chastized the guy for wasting his time because he had real crimes to work on.

    But Nocco apparently wanted to send a message, and won't hesitate to lock up more teenagers for trying to use Skype in school.

    Message received. Chris Nocco was apparently Deputy Chief of Staff to the Speaker of the House Marco Rubio and a graduate of the FBI National Executive Institute. Seems our tax dollars being wasted on intimidating children is the real "threat" here.

  15. Protect the children by davydagger · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Oh, wait, it seems that we only care about "protecting the children", when its an excuse to cram morals based on superstition and mythology, or we want to ban something with the intent of arresting people, or give the police new powers to arrest people, harshen sentances, or errode the rights of the accused.

    But really, there are some pretty loud crickets when the state gets a hardon for arresting/harrassing children.

    1. Re:Protect the children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I take a slight exception to Your observation because one really good moral "based on superstition and mythology" is to help and serve, such as adopting behaviors/norms/laws which reduce poverty and working to alleviate the suffering of Others. I do agree, however, Anyone moralizing about "protecting the children" should speak up if They want to be taken with any degree of sincerity.

    2. Re:Protect the children by davydagger · · Score: 1

      Your observation because one really good moral "based on superstition and mythology" is to help and serve, such as adopting behaviors/norms/laws which reduce poverty and working to alleviate the suffering of Others

      There is a stark diffrence between morales based on mutual aid, respect for the human condition, equality, and universal human rights, based on observation based facts, using controlled studies to determine cause and effect, than those based on superstition and mythology.

      The fact that we as a nation cannot tell the diffrence is part of the reason why we have such a high poverty rate, such a high incarceration rate, glorify criminals, and criminalize reformers.

      The biggest threat to our children is not some creep, pedophile, terrorist, or musician. Its school administrators, politicians, facebook, google, and rouge fire-and-brimestone preachers.

  16. Lock him up! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    It's the American way!

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  17. Tech illiteracy at its finest by mcfatboy93 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you obviously don't understand what the kid did, they how do you expect people to believe that your judgment is fair?

    Its clear in this situation the kid is the only one who knows that a computer isn't a magic box with pretty lights.

    --
    Its not my fault, someone put a wall in my way.
  18. Seems like a good lesson. by WarlockD · · Score: 2

    Sheriff warned that other teenagers caught doing the same thing will "face the same consequences

    1. Re:Seems like a good lesson. by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Yup, that is all this is. So much over reaction here. They were just scaring the kid and setting an example, then drop the charges, the kid walks and has learned a lesson.

      This is nothing new... cops have used lots of tactics to scare kids, throwing them in jail or stuff like that. Its a very effective approach.

    2. Re:Seems like a good lesson. by itzly · · Score: 1

      This is nothing new... cops have used lots of tactics to scare kids, throwing them in jail or stuff like that. Its a very effective approach.

      Not nearly as effective as a few bullets in the back, though.

  19. Re:Bias in article? Or sarcasm? by x0ra · · Score: 1

    How refreshing would it be if Sheriff Nocco appropriately laughed at the teacher, said they had both done worse as kids, and lightly chastized the guy for wasting his time because he had real crimes to work on.

    That's probably how 99.99% of sheriff/LEO reacts, and then, there is this 0.01% who seem to think they are white knights in shinny armor fighting a crusade which makes the other 99.99% looks like waffen-SS... I wonder if MSM have an agenda...

  20. Wow ... by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sometimes you have to look at how these laws are being applied, and fight back the overwhelming urge to slap the stupid from the people who pursue these charges. And it might take a lot of slapping.

    This is a high school prank, nothing more.

    Honestly, the people who are filing felony charges of complete morons.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Wow ... by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      Green had previously received a three-day suspension for accessing the system inappropriately. Other students also got in trouble at the time, he said. It was a well-known trick, Green said, because the password was easy to remember: a teacher's last name. He said he discovered it by watching the teacher type it in.

      My question is if he had already been suspended for a different incident with the same password why was the password not changed?

       

    2. Re:Wow ... by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, let's not make the lazy, incompetent people who run these computers and assigned terrible passwords out to be at fault here.

      That's just blaming the victim and using common sense.

      Honestly, anything he did after they already knew he had the password makes them complete idiots.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Wow ... by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      The headline doesn't point out that as a juvenile with no prior record he will likely qualify for a diversion were he is on sudo probation might need to do some community service and if he successfully completes it the charges are dropped and there are no felonies on his record.

    4. Re:Wow ... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Honestly, this is using a cannon to swat a mosquito. The legal charges are grossly disproportionate to what he did.

      This is like putting teenagers who are almost adults on the sex offenders registry for taking pictures of their own junk.

      Basically it is criminalizing something WAY disproportionate to what happened.

      Potentially ruining the life of a kid for changing a desktop background? That sheriff is an incompetent fool, as is anybody else in the legal system who helps this happen.

      But then again, schools seem to just go to full stupid these days over stuff, because they're being ran by people who barely grasp the issues and act like petty dictators.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:Wow ... by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      There is guy on the sex offender list in my neighborhood on his 18th birthday his girlfriend's father had him arrested then when she turned 18 the next year and moved out she married him and had a restraining order placed against the father because he crashed the wedding and assaulted the groom.

       

    6. Re:Wow ... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      he is on sudo probation

      If I had sudo privileges there I'd do "sudo drop-charges" instead.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  21. Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Damn wallpaper changers. They are a menace to society! I can't count how many sleepless nights I have suffered worrying about someone changing wallpapers on computers. Soon anyone could be changing the wallpaper on their own computers. It's anarchy, I tell you!!

    Thank God the police are doing something about this.

  22. It's because the picture was gay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    .. seriously. People (teacher, principal, cops, judge) presumably took great offence here because of the content. "Christian convervatives" don't tolerate homosexuality well, and *that* is the reason this kid had to be made an example of.

    The fact that the teacher didn't know how to choose a strong password, or the cops didn't understand this to be a meaningless prank does aggravate the sense that these authority figures are not only conservative, but relatively dumb too...

  23. Glad to hear by itzly · · Score: 1

    Glad to hear that the kid wasn't shot in the back 8 times while trying to get away.

  24. Social Engineering 101 - grade A by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Congrats, student!

    Your instructor has been awarded an F grade.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  25. What about the teacher? by txoutback · · Score: 1

    Maybe the teacher should be reprimanded for negligence.

  26. go back... by hitmark · · Score: 1

    a few decades and the kid would have been asked to do junior admin stuff after school.

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  27. Ridiculous article title by WD · · Score: 4, Informative

    The student observed the teacher's keyboard while the password was typed in. The student then used that observed password to unlawfully gain access to the system in question.

    This has nothing to do with the wallpaper. The student leveraged unauthorized access to a system to do something.

    1. Re:Ridiculous article title by itzly · · Score: 1

      This has nothing to do with the wallpaper. The student leveraged unauthorized access to a system to do something.

      Yes, the student leveraged unauthorized access to change the wallpaper.

    2. Re:Ridiculous article title by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      You idiot. How dare you point out that they title is pure flamebait!
      What will you do next? Logical discourse?
      What is the world coming too.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:Ridiculous article title by mythosaz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm with you.

      He had already been busted and slapped on the wrist:

      Green had previously received a three-day suspension for accessing the system inappropriately. Other students also got in trouble at the time, he said. It was a well-known trick, Green said, because the password was easy to remember: a teacher's last name. He said he discovered it by watching the teacher type it in.

      The only problem here is that he's being charged with a felony, because hacking laws on the books don't make a distinction between "petty" hacking and "grand" hacking. There's no shoplifting equivalent on the hacking books; it's all grand theft auto.

      The teacher needs reprimanded by his IT department and his leadership (principal, union, whatever).
      The kid needs his wrist slapped, and and county attorney needs to decide not to file charges, charge him with some sort of misdemeanor mischief charge instead.

    4. Re:Ridiculous article title by bughunter · · Score: 1

      This is like charging someone with felony burglary for watching a neighbor hide his key under his doormat, then using it to gain entry and re-arrange the potted plants.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    5. Re:Ridiculous article title by harperska · · Score: 1

      Felony burglary, no, as re-arranging potted plants is not itself a crime. It would be perfectly reasonable to charge that person with criminal trespass, however. Knowledge that the key is hidden under the doormat does not mean that you have the right to enter. In fact, the fact that it was hidden, even if weakly so, would imply that the intent is the opposite.

  28. Re:Corporate Diversity? by mythosaz · · Score: 2

    You kid, I'm sure, but Land O'Lakes is part of the Tampa Florida MSA.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L...

  29. CS will fill jail cells. by geekmux · · Score: 1

    So, with the continued attitude that anyone who changes a parameter from the default setting is suddenly a "terrorist", I can only assume that the push for more CS in schools today is nothing more than a lobbyist-driven push to fill privatized prisons.

    It might as well be, with felony threats against a 14-year old. Don't be surprised when you can't get any gender to fill a CS classroom with idiotic law enforcement reactions like this.

    1. Re:CS will fill jail cells. by omnichad · · Score: 2

      Prison workers are cheaper than H1B workers. Maybe there's a nefarious patriotic plot behind all this.

  30. Jesus. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think I'd have been put away for life, if I was younger and in the US, or possibly tasered, charged with assulting a cop's fist with my face then shot.

    When I were a lad and the school computers ran Windows 95 (all spiffy and shiny and new they were), I created a trojan floppy which renamed and overwrote some key executables which autoexec.bat with my own ones. My ones passed on the arguments to the true ones so the boot process worked as usual and it was very hard to see that it was trojaned.

    Of course they were set to "go off" on a certain date as a prank on a teacher who was being a dick and who many people had complained about and nothing changed.

    All you had to do was slip in the floppy, reboot and it would install the trojan. Of course once word got around everyone wanted in on the act so I had to do very little of the legwork to trojan the entire computer lab.

    I got a "yeah very funny (snigger) don't do that again mmmmkay?" talk.

    And that was it.

    Come to think of it I was always pissing around and hacking.

    What is school if not a safe environment for kids to learn stuff and learn where the boundaries are?

    Everyone involved in this charge should be hounded out of office and publicly shamed for being reprehensible humans.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
    1. Re:Jesus. by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Glad they didnt do stuff like this 15 years ago. I remember back in high school using Word to access the locked out C: drive of computers and me and my friends would save SNES emulators there and play SNES games during class. We were in a Magnet program so they probably wouldn't have done much to us if caught, but if we had done that now and gotten caught we would all probably have been arrested.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:Jesus. by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Everyone involved in this charge should be hounded out of office and publicly shamed for being reprehensible humans.

      No, they should face legal action. What's an appropriate punishment for violating the law against cruel and unusual punishment?

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  31. The law should not protect the stupid by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    But it does. Sadly, it does.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  32. Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... no doubt if i was in america at his age i would have life in a max security for the easter egg click bate scripts i scattered over my school network through privilege escalation.

    If you are an even mildly above average computer user the clear message here is stay the hell away from America, it's judicial system is run by people who think computers are black magic, and anyone capable with them that did something even slightly against the rules is a witch and should be burned.

  33. Re:Hate Crime by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Have the school be charged on it. After all, them complaining about him hacking is just a fig leaf excuse for being prejudiced against homosexuality!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  34. They have to do something to keep the prisons full by wizkid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Since states are now legalizing POT, the numbers are starting to Drop. So they've made the bar way lower on computer mucking!

    We gotta do something to keep the damn prisons filled!

    --
    I take no responsibility for what I say. Even though I'm never wrong :)
  35. Re:The good old days by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 5, Funny

    I did this to a friend, on his Christmas computer. Him, his father and his Marine buddies all seriously contemplated killing me. They were utterly furious and I didn't return for a long time. Of course, the gentleman featured on the desktop were unclothed in addition, but aren't we all, in a sense? Good fun, indeed.

    Reminds me of a friend who was tired of his neighbor using his wifi so rather than putting a password on it, like a normal person, he instead used mac filtering to redirect all requests originating from unrecognized mac's to lemon party.

    --
    ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  36. Re:Corporate Diversity? by CronoCloud · · Score: 2

    There are PLACES in the US named "Land 'O Lakes", like the COMMUNITY where the facility is located:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L...

    that have nothing to do with "Land 'O Lakes" the dairy company/cooperative based in Minnesota

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L...

  37. Re:Headline by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    The school IS overreacting!

    And on more than one level, too. Think there would have been the same reaction if he changed it to a picture of puppies? Heck no. But now the school had to "explain" why there was two guys kissing (THINKOFTHECHILDREN! They might see two MEN kissing. TWO MEN! Teh horrorz, and nazis will ride on dinos if we let it happen!).

    So we need to distract them! Have the boy charged with ... no matter what, but a lot! We need them to see that we don't accept that SMUT ... but without calling it smut, ya know, there's that hate-crime thing, and ... well, we can't be outraged 'cause he showed two guys kissing, but we want them fucking soccer moms to know that we won't let "SOMETHING LIKE THAT" happen at our school.

    Fuck those soccer moms.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  38. Re:Who cares. by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    People like you help enable state sponsored terror.

  39. Not the first time he was caught by tomhath · · Score: 1
    FTFA:

    Green had previously received a three-day suspension for accessing the system inappropriately. Other students also got in trouble at the time, he said. . . . Green said that on the morning in question, he accessed the computer that stored the FCAT files and, realizing that computer didn't have a camera, found another. "So I logged out of that computer and logged into a different one and I logged into a teacher's computer who I didn't like and tried putting inappropriate pictures onto his computer to annoy him," Green said.

    So the kid received a warning the first time. He knew that what he was doing could get him in trouble, but he decided to harass the teacher anyway. Too bad they aren't allowed to paddle.

    1. Re:Not the first time he was caught by itzly · · Score: 1

      The teacher got a warning too, but didn't feel like changing the password.

    2. Re:Not the first time he was caught by pbhj · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he wanted to give the kid enough rope to hang himself. Change the password and lock the kid out, or keep it and have the kid incriminate himself and get punished ...

  40. punish the administrators. by nimbius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As a sysadmin this brings me to tears of anger because this isnt the kids fault and instead of learning about the system or security, theyre just learning what it feels like to be incarcerated without due process.

    a competent IT department for the education system has likely determined a best-practices for passwords but been overruled by administrators and staff citing computers, their difficulty, and their ironic unwillingness to themselves learn. Result: easy passwords. Instead of paperwork, meetings with staff, meetings with IT, and a documented record of a potential lapse in workplace best practises the educators have decided to railroad some poor kid into a trial offer of the prison pipeline and continue with school, business as usual.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:punish the administrators. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree with this completely. I'm the IT Dir for a medium sized school district and I would be having it out in the Superintendent's office right now about how we should punish the stupid teacher and Admin for fostering an insecure environment. I would also be on a IT staff beating spree for allowing the use of names for account credentials.

      The student should ghttp://yro.slashdot.org/story/15/04/10/1541258/florida-teen-charged-with-felony-hacking-for-changing-desktop-wallpaper?utm_source=feedly1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feed#et a few days of OSS for breaking policy, but felony charges are simply bullshit.

    2. Re:punish the administrators. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      As a sysadmin this brings me to tears of anger because this isnt the kids fault

      It's true. Weak passwords cause the chips in the computer to emit a special kind of electromagnetic radiation which, by sheer coincidence, perfectly stimulates exactly the right combination of untold millions of synapses in a kid's brain (just one kid - it's too focused to impact the others in the classroom), and that pattern happens to exactly manifest itself as an uncontrollable urge to form a plan and take an extended combination of actions that include the very complex process of walking to the computer, logging in, and dealing with the steps involved in fetching a file and updating the desktop. It's an amazing chain of events, especially since in culminates in a level of direct mind control that no scientist could, by any other means, actually reproduce if they tried.

      Definitely not the kid's fault. He had no ability to use his arms, legs, and fingers to pursue any other action except the logging in and defacement of the teacher's desktop. Complete, 100% compulsion through mind control due to weak password EM radiation. Amazing!

      Or, the kid's a bit of a dick who, despite no doubt being told - along with all of his classmates - that improper use of the school's computer equipment, let alone trying to hack into systems used by and for the teachers and staff is a seriously bad thing ... thought he was too cool to get caught, and too entitled to experience any consequences.

      Yeah, it's one of those two things. Either a kid being a dick, or mind control from the weak password. Probably the password thing.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    3. Re:punish the administrators. by umghhh · · Score: 1

      You are right about general idiocy of security policy in that school. Yet that is hugely irrelevant to the case - the boy broke the law which may indicate that the pupils in that school were not taught about vital issues concerning security and privacy and how serious such offenses may be. If they did maybe the pwd would not be that easy to see, it would not be that easy to guess and possibly if such privacy importance courses were done in every school the criminals from NSA would be serving their time in prison. Well I guess I exaggerated about how far we could go still blaming the teacher or the school for bad security policies is just, as said, not the point.

    4. Re:punish the administrators. by pellik · · Score: 1

      In other words, instead of getting a lesson that appeals to nerds about how system security works, he's getting a much more useful lesson about how the whole world works.

    5. Re:punish the administrators. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      weren't you a dick at times in your teens as well?

      Yes. And at no point was it someone else's fault.

      So, you're saying he was only under 99% mind control, and only 1% of his own mind was in a position to try to stop himself from signing into a teacher's computer to deface it?

      Are you REALLY saying that their weak password is WHY he did what he did?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  41. On the bright side by nedlohs · · Score: 4, Informative

    At least he didn't just take 8 bullets to the back.

  42. == All stealing is equally bad by tomxor · · Score: 2

    So should someone who steals $2 million and a kid who steals a pencil sharpener both be given the same jail sentence?

    This is the same. Never mind that what he did with his ILLEGAL access was completely harmless (the pencil sharpener would actually slightly damage the shop keepers income if only slightly).

    ... absolutist

    1. Re:== All stealing is equally bad by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      So should someone who steals $2 million and a kid who steals a pencil sharpener both be given the same jail sentence?

      Yes. Return what you stole and stay in your room until you've learned your lesson.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
  43. Remote control hacks by n1ywb · · Score: 1

    In 8th grade this one guy used pc anywhere or whatever was around back then to remote into a computer being used by a much younger student and started typed YOU WILL DIE. There was a flap, but it didn't involve police.

    --
    -73, de n1ywb
    www.n1ywb.com
  44. OT .signature Re:Insanity by davidwr · · Score: 4, Funny

    Help! Help! I'm being repressed!

    First they pressed you. Then they re-pressed you. Now you are flat.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  45. Unauthorized access is illegal. Period. by Theovon · · Score: 2

    The teacher who used their own last name as an admin password is an idiot and should be reprimanded.

    But an unlocked door is not an invitation to come in and snoop around someone's house, even if all you do is swap some picture frames around. That's what the kid did. It was unauthorized tresspassing. He should be suspended. If he'd done something worse, he should be expelled and/or prosecuted. Also, we don't know what else he did, and even if it was nothing, not coming down hard on this will make other students think this kind of violation is not a big deal. Unauthorized access IS a big deal, because commonly enough it's done for nefarious purposes, like changing grades or getting a peek at exam questions. Also, tresspassing in general is wrong.

    As for the two men kissing, who cares. In 100 years, that'll be as not a big deal as interracial kissing is right now. If the photo is overly sexual in some way, then perhaps there may be an added problem of inappropriateness. In our current culture and all things being equal, a photo of a man and a woman kissing is more likely to be considered "romantic", while two people of the same sex kissing is going to be interpreted more sexually. That's not exactly fair, though, and if the school were to openly interpret it that way, they'd get into a world of shit politically.

  46. Detention? by pr0t0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Was a simple, after-school detention not an option for some reason? I mean, really? You called the police? Did da big bad hacker scare you wif his eweet skills? Jumping Jesus on a pogostick! They're kids, mischievous by nature. Give the kid a detention, and institute a sane fucking password policy!

    If I were a parent of a child in this school, I'd be outraged. I'm outraged right now, and I don't live anywhere near Florida!

    --
    I'm sorry, but your opinion seems to be wrong.
    1. Re:Detention? by jbengt · · Score: 2

      Was a simple, after-school detention not an option for some reason?

      Been there. Done that. Three strikes and you're out. (RTFA)
      Still, a felony seems awfully harsh.

  47. Sounds like someone is misinterpreting Judge Dredd by timrod · · Score: 1

    The sheriff in this case sounds like he read a Judge Dredd comic and assumed it was supposed to be a manual for how the justice system should work.

  48. Re:They have to do something to keep the prisons f by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

    You there! Are you running an unauthorized hex-editor?! That is a capital offense. I'd read you your rights, but as of today, you have none.

  49. Send them a message by Jawnn · · Score: 1

    "Sheriff Nocco seems to be taking this threat seriously. The report says the student "was released on Wednesday from Land O'Lakes Detention Center into the custody of his mother," which means the kid was brought into a holding cell for the incident, which sounds completely unnecessary. But Nocco apparently wanted to send a message, and won't hesitate to lock up more teenagers for trying to use Skype in school."
    So, uh..., why aren't we "sending a message" to the dumb-fuck faculty who are, no doubt, violating policy by using such weak access control procedures? Better question, why didn't the reporter think to ask that question?

  50. Florida. by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1

    That says it all.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  51. If he had changed it to Kittens by Bonzoli · · Score: 1

    If he had not put 2 Gay men kissing on the desktop this would be a non story and he would not have been charged. But this is Merica!!! and clearly this kid is a problem, we should use him to up our chances to be Sheriff in the next voting season.
    Sometimes I'm disgusted with my country more than normal.

  52. Not all of Facts by Ozark_Centurion · · Score: 1

    If you follow all of the link you'll find out that the student did more than change wallpaper. He went and observed the FCAT files and was on other computers as well. Also there seems to be more than one student doing this. It seems at the moment that this kid is the first one charged for hacking.

    1. Re:Not all of Facts by Drewdad · · Score: 1

      You have problems with reading comprehension:

      "One of the computers Green, 14, accessed also had encrypted 2014 FCAT questions stored on it, though the sheriff and Pasco County School District officials said Green did not view or tamper with those files."

    2. Re:Not all of Facts by Ozark_Centurion · · Score: 1

      Touche, you are totally right I must of been reading it too quickly.

  53. Reminds me by Draeven · · Score: 1

    of when I was in high school in the mid 90s. Thankfully I didn't have to deal with criminal charges however.

    Back when computer classes were still a new thing in high schools, I was attending introduction to computers for my first period. We'd all come in and turn on the computers and watch them boot up Windows 95.

    These computers had a virus scan set to run during boot up, and on that particular day, it had found a virus. I waved the teacher over and pointed it out.

    From that point on I was forbidden to take any computer classes in high school ever again.

    1. Re:Reminds me by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Why didn't your parents step up to the school (and higher if necessary) on this?

  54. Re:Glad it wasn't like this when I was a kid! by omnichad · · Score: 1

    No kidding. Back when computers were on display and you could actually touch and play with them, I loved setting the start menu font color to the same as the background color. Same to the menus. And since they didn't know what to do about it, it would still be that way weeks later.

  55. Makes perfect sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Kids need to learn the consequences of embarrassing powerful people. That is one of the golden rules of modern society; thou shalt not embarrass thy superiors. Snowden forgot that, and this little punk forgot that.

    You respect your betters, or you get tossed in a cage. That's the law. Ingrain that into your kid's brains before puberty hits, or they will wind up in a cage too.

    1. Re:Makes perfect sense. by weilawei · · Score: 1

      I would've modded this +1 Funny if I had points. It walks that very fine razor's edge of Poe's Law, but I suspect it falls on the side of parody.

    2. Re: Makes perfect sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Snowden didn't forget this, he purpously set out to do the right thing.

    3. Re:Makes perfect sense. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Kids need to learn the consequences of embarrassing powerful people. That is one of the golden rules of modern society; thou shalt not embarrass thy superiors. ... You respect your betters, or you get tossed in a cage.

      Let's remember that "superiors" and "betters" aren't really the same thing. An idea not recognized by many corporate types.

    4. Re:Makes perfect sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's what you are upset about? If voting had any actual power behind it, the politicians would have made it illegal long ago.

      Incidentally, if you think you are better than women or blacks, then you don't know your place. There are only three tiers in humanity: the super-rich, the rich, and the poor. That's it. Based on the fact that you posted on slashdot, I am willing to wager that you are among "the poor." As much as it might hurt your fragile pride to realize this, you are just as insignificant as any other member of your class.

      I know, people in the lower classes like to mentally divide the class up into a few more levels. It is all foolishness. For all practical purposes, you are one of them. The sooner you know your place, and act appropriately, the sooner your lot will improve.

    5. Re:Makes perfect sense. by ghettoimp · · Score: 1

      There needs to be a /whoosh option for moderators.

    6. Re:Makes perfect sense. by joebagodonuts · · Score: 1

      "...then the law is an ass" - Charles Dickens

      --
      "Give a woman two glasses of wine and some pad thai, and they'll agree to just about anything." the Sports Guy
    7. Re:Makes perfect sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Parody? You are a naïf sheep.

      "Steal a little and they put you in jail, steal a lot and they make you king." - Bob Dylan

      "In its majestic equality, the law forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal loaves of bread." - Anatole France

    8. Re:Makes perfect sense. by tsa · · Score: 1

      Respect has to be earned.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    9. Re:Makes perfect sense. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Kids need to learn the consequences of embarrassing powerful people. That is one of the golden rules of modern society; thou shalt not embarrass thy superiors. Snowden forgot that, and this little punk forgot that.

      Are you for real? It is hard to tell whether this is sarcasm, but I suspect that it is.

      You respect your betters, or you get tossed in a cage. That's the law. Ingrain that into your kid's brains before puberty hits, or they will wind up in a cage too.

      There are no "betters", in America. Hell, I had a very hard time trying to teach my British manager that, way back when. He felt justified in taking credit for my work, because he was a manager and a "better".

      Haha.

      But again, that's sarcasm. Here's what I actually suggest: pretend to respect your "betters", because in fact that's all they require: the facade. Then when they're not looking, prove they're not "better".

      I don't mean backstabbing. I mean frontstabbing. Make the truth plain to all.

    10. Re:Makes perfect sense. by The+Black+Oak · · Score: 1

      Yes embrace your slavery

    11. Re:Makes perfect sense. by the_digitalmouse · · Score: 1

      an anonymous coward babbles: "You respect your betters, or you get tossed in a cage. That's the law. Ingrain that into your kid's brains before puberty hits, or they will wind up in a cage too."

      The problem with that nonsense is at least two-fold. 1) People who think they are better do not actually deserve respect, regardless of age or wisdom, and 2) leaving out religious dogma, there is no law stating that you must respect "your betters".

      Ingrain respect for property ownership and perhaps slap the teacher with a stupid stick for not following basic security principles.

      --
      http://about.me/jimm.pratt
    12. Re:Makes perfect sense. by perih60 · · Score: 1

      i am obviously missing something . i know that a person is guilty until proven innocent . i read that this boy has been CHARGED AND ARRESTED , i have not seen anything about this boy having been TRIED ! most people know that even with the best system on earth , innocent people are in jail ! even on death row ! as a child i was told to respect my elders , i was 11 when i had to learn the metric system again . i told the teacher that one liter of water weights one kilo . he did not tare the bottle and this teacher told the class " as you can see 1 ltr = 2.58 Kg ! i understand the point you are making , and agree with you . i just feel the prepuberty kids must understand why .

      --
      the power of men in charge of words over men in charge of machines surpasses all wondering S WEIL
  56. Re:Unauthorized access is illegal. Period. by omnichad · · Score: 1

    And it's not even an unlocked door. It's a lock door with the key taped to the front of the door. So you still have to break-in to trespass. I don't know if that's a requirement for it being a violation of the CFAA or not.

  57. Re:Unauthorized access is illegal. Period. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, and trespassing (in the real world) is a misdemeanor, generally speaking. Not a felony, a misdemeanor. Why should the equivalent on a computer be any different?

    That said, I doubt most prosecutors would bother if someone reported that someone else had trespassed to leave a photo. They'd probably tell you to lock your door.

  58. Re:Unauthorized access is illegal. Period. by Theovon · · Score: 1

    Even without admin rights, the students should not be using teachers' accounts.

  59. One more reason to avoid school by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    One more reason to _not_ send your kids to public school.

  60. Let's Be Honest at Least ... by ilparatzo · · Score: 1

    ... He wasn't charged with hacking for changing a desktop background. He was charged with hacking for discovering and then using the teacher's password to log into the computer and THEN change the background. He's being charged for a crime for doing what he did prior to changing the background.

    If I break into someone's home and then proceed to just move their stuff around, I'm not charged with Breaking and Entering for moving their stuff around. I'm charged with breaking and entering for BREAKING AND ENTERING.

  61. Re:Unauthorized access is illegal. Period. by Theovon · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what is the difference (in any philosophical sense) between (a) exploiting a known vulnerability to hack in that they should have fixed ages ago, (b) using social engineering to get someone to inadvertently give you access, or (c) guessing someone's really stupid password.

    All of them are "abuse" of a secured system.

    For that matter, say a teacher stays logged in and goes to the bathroom, and while they're away, some students use the teacher's account. So it's wide open, and the teacher was stupid for doing that. But this is kinda like leaving your car running with the keys in while you run into the 7-11. If someone steals your car, they're still stealing your car, even if you made it easy for them to do it.

    Students should live in deathly fear of what horrible things might happen to them if they inappropriately access a teacher's computer account. A misdemeanor charge may not be enough to get through to them.

    The teen brain is interesting. They're almost too logical. If they knew the real statistics about pregnancy and STD's, a lot more of them would be fucking, and then that would actually alter the statistics. This is why teachers and parents commonly make it sound like every sexual encounter leads to disease, ruined lives, and all manner of other scary things. Well, disease and ruined lives happen often enough that people need to be *extremely* cafeful about it, but teens are not exacly known for their mature and careful choices.

    So if this student gets punished in proportion to the crime (basically a slap on the wrist), it is a real concern that this kind of intrusion may start to happen more often, because the risks to the perpetrators are so low.

  62. Re:Unauthorized access is illegal. Period. by Theovon · · Score: 1

    See my other post. The idea isn't so much to make the punishment for teenagers more than for adults but to make the punishment SCARIER. The more I think about this, this student should get charged with a felony and then have that expunged from their record at 18. It needs to be a super big deal to everyone so that other students don't think they'll get away with the same shit.

  63. This wasn't even high school by Kaptain+Kruton · · Score: 1

    This is a high school prank, nothing more.

    The kid wasn't even in high school. It it is a middle school prank.

  64. Criminal? by sreever · · Score: 2

    When I was in school and got in a fight, they didn't call the cops a charge us with assault. They handled it at the school....

  65. Try this one little life hack... by DarthVain · · Score: 3

    I'm sure there is a "life hack" for that...

    One of my pet peeves is the overuse of the word "hacking" or "hack" in contexts that doesn't make sense or are just incorrect.

    In this case, there was no hacking involved. He knew the password and used it. Unauthorized access isn't hacking. Then again people with a bias or agenda will use terms for impact, just like "theft" and "stealing" when used in context of copyright infringement.

    To me, when people do that with words, they are just explaining to people either A) how biased they are, or B) how little they understand the subject at hand. Either way, not worth reading or listening to.

    1. Re:Try this one little life hack... by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. The kid didn't "brute force" the password. In fact, he SAW the teacher enter the password. He could claim that the teacher must have known that the students were watching him type the password, and therefore it was understood that the password was no longer secret.

      Honestly, it would have been more of a hack if he had installed some sort of back door administration program that would allow him to remotely change the wallpaper. (It might have been smarter to do that, too, because it would look more like malware than a high school prank)

    2. Re:Try this one little life hack... by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      In this case, there was no hacking involved. He knew the password and used it. Unauthorized access isn't hacking.

      I disagree. If you're not supposed to know the password and you find it out and use it knowingly, then that is hacking. Regardless of how simple or basic the password is, it's still hacking because you've bypassed an access control system (no matter how trivial)
      I agree the word hacking is overused - "life hack" shits me to tears, but I do something similar for shits and giggles. Watch carefully as people in the office swipe or tap their key on their phone, then when they leave it unattended on the desk charging, I'll tap it in to see if I got it right. This is a very basic type of hack, but still a hack nonetheless.

    3. Re:Try this one little life hack... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Most phone passwords are terrible anyway.

      A number of years ago I was at a stag party where we rented a cabin. One of the previous occupants left her wallet with her iPhone in it. One I the guys as a lark tried to "hack" her iPhone. He tried 1,2,3,4 and that didn't work. He then looked in her wallet, found her driver's licence with her birthday in it, and entered MMYY. Click. Two very lazy attempts and we had access.

      In this case we called her mom from her contact list, and got her daughters address and mailed her phone back to her... but not before the guys took a lot of funny pictures first... :)

      To "hack" came from the writing world and sitting down on a typewriter and just banging something out quickly without a lot of preparation. Later it was borrowed by the computer world to mean a quickly done, solution (usually code) to an immediate problem.

      Had any effort taken place to "hack" the school computer it might be though of as such, however simply knowing the correct password because the teacher didn't really keep it a secret isn't much of a hack.

      There used to be a distinction between crack and hack, typically based on the purposes of the actions. One was the freedom of information and access for all, the other more nefarious.

  66. Goddamn!! I feel sorry for kids today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    After guessing my schools admin password "JC1997 which they changed" I changed my entire schools computer lab homepage to whitehouse.com back when it was still a porn site. You know what happened? They let me off with a warning and banned me from using the lab for two weeks. Skip forward two years. I guessed it again "JC1999 SMFH" and changed it to a nasty .cx website. Saturday detention and banned from the lab for the rest of the year. 37 days

  67. Your real crime . . . by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1
    . . . was that the computers worked better when the sys admin was away on vacation?

    Maybe it was a job security thang?

  68. Protest? by friedmud · · Score: 1

    This is actually fairly upsetting news.

    Instead of just whining on a forum... does anyone have any ideas on what can actually be done for this kid? Should we start a fund for his defense? Can we organize a local protest? Should we write letters to local officials?

    In a democracy it's up to the citizens to stand up and say when something isn't right. And this most definitely is NOT right. This kid's life is going to be ruined because of a prank. Insane.

    1. Re:Protest? by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Instead of just whining on a forum... does anyone have any ideas on what can actually be done for this kid? Should we start a fund for his defense? Can we organize a local protest? Should we write letters to local officials?

      Write his name down on your short list to hire as a system administrator. The police won't release his name because he's a juvenile, but it's probably on Facebook.

  69. Pride by synaptic · · Score: 1

    Computer teachers and district network administrators hate being shown up by some snot-nose kid. The DA will charge this kid with unauthorized use of a computer system, typically a fourth degree felony, and the school will likely change none of their security practices. After all, becoming a teenage felon is a pretty good deterrent, right?

    Who needs a password policy? Who needs two-factor auth? They'll just arrest anybody that embarrasses them.

    This kind of crap happened at my high school 20 years ago. They ignored warnings about gaping security holes, coming down hard on the whistleblowers (i.e. me), then saw their network go down when some other kid exploited it months later.

  70. Teacher? Teachers... IT? by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

    They said "teachers", it sounds more like lazy IT that got bored of resetting passwords, and issued all machines with the given teachers last name as the password.

    1. Re:Teacher? Teachers... IT? by myth24601 · · Score: 1

      Lazy IT, sure, but we are talking about teachers here, not professional office workers. They were probably locking themselves out their systems every time they had to change their passwords which caused disruption to instructional time so the Principal ordered all passwords to be locked down to the teachers last names.

      At any rate, this might deserve a talking to and perhaps some sort of school punishment. Calling in the police and bringing felony charges just confirms my above views that the teachers and principal are likely not the cream of the crop.

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
  71. Similar Incedent in my High school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    we had a rash of bomb threats after 9/11. I live in a town with more cows than people, and they took every one of the threats dead seriously. Immediately after the first threat came in, all students were required to have either clear or mesh backpacks and every student's person was thoroughly searched upon entering the school. The worst event came when, in a middle school (which is attached to the high school) a student left a yellow legal pad note stating "bin laden should fly a plane into the school) We had a full lock down, students were ordered to congregate in the gym. (because what better way to avoid a bomb than to put everyone in the same room). My point here is this: Schools with a "zero tolerance" policy are quick to pull the trigger and make everything a worst case scenario.

  72. When I was their age by shuz · · Score: 1

    Child hood friends of mine would do such things as create dos boot disks that would contain "format C: /u /autotest" in the autoexec.bat file and put them into demo computers at the local wal-mart. Or play doom on the lan during "programming class". Or monkey with disks in the local library. Of course back then Mac's and Windows OS's had easily exploited holes and there wasn't much need for admin usernames and passwords. That said a few days suspension is probably all students faced(followed by staff requesting the student to help them teach computer classes). Pressing charges on a student is probably not the best way to enforce good behaviors. The teacher(s) should also be reprimanded at the very least to use better password and password sharing judgement. Leave your desktop unlocked? At my workplace you would be asking for kitty pictures or I love Microsoft messages on your desktop/browser.

    --
    There is or can be built a machine that can simulate any physical object. -Church-Turing principle
  73. Re:Vote for Florida... by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

    The real crime here is you are too stupid to realize what the kid did was wrong.

  74. He set out to embarass a teacher he disliked. by westlake · · Score: 1

    Especially because he put GAY GUYS on the computer, the horrors. If he had changed the wallpaper to a cat picture this would not have happened I guarantee it.

    Don't be an idiot.

    Green said that on the morning in question, he accessed the computer that stored the FCAT files and, realizing that computer didn't have a camera, found another.

    ''So I logged out of that computer and logged into a different one and I logged into a teacher's computer who I didn't like and tried putting inappropriate pictures onto his computer to annoy him,'' Green said.

    The teacher he was targeting was out that day. Instead, the substitute teacher saw the picture and reported it to the school's administration.

    Middle school student charged with cybercrime in Holiday

    1. Re:He set out to embarass a teacher he disliked. by perih60 · · Score: 1

      do these statements come from the KIDS trial . if not if he has not had a chance to prove his innocence . in all the posts i have read here , as interesting as a lot are nobody has written anything about a persons guilt untill they prove their innoce , i find this strange

      --
      the power of men in charge of words over men in charge of machines surpasses all wondering S WEIL
  75. G I T M O for trespassing by redelm · · Score: 1

    Release? Released? Why should such a dangerous hax0r ever be released? He should be locked away forever in Gitmo or some SuperMax :)

    Seriously, "unauthorized access" looks most like the cyber-equivalent of the ancient infraction of trespass. The same common-law defenses should apply (here the concept of "attractive nuisance").

    Pandering to the fear of the ignorant with draconian punishments is the very opposite of liberty. And progress will suffer for the witchhunts (already has).

  76. I wonder if the kid is black... by ampsicora · · Score: 2

    ...article doesn't mention ethnicity, but from the treatment, it sounds like the kid is black...

  77. ridiculous by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    In college I had an autorun entry on my USB flash drive that ran a program that changed the background. Nobody cared.

  78. Re:Vote for Florida... by aaronb1138 · · Score: 1

    Yep, this is exactly how I want computing laws to work, based on the 70-80's standards. It's under those same standards that most forms of internet advertising are illegal forms of hacking and computer time use.

    When you roll forward to the concept of smart phones with battery restrictions and "just enough" computing power as a key concept, suddenly the incredible usage loss by the owner whenever inundated by advertisements looks janky. It makes sense as to why no one but the owner / administrator may authorize code to execute as far as the legal wordings go from way back in time.

  79. Morons don't learn quicklly by mbeckman · · Score: 1

    If some moron walks into your house through an unlocked door and begins riffling through your things, that's trespassing. As the home's resident, you're entitled to apprehend them and prosecute. Same thing here. These delinquents will either learn or they will remain morons.

    1. Re:Morons don't learn quicklly by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Such trespass is frequently just a tort and sometimes a misdemeanor. As far as I know, simple trespass is never a felony. You are allowed to prosecute (one of the differences between a tort and a crime: an individual prosecutes a tort, the government prosecutes a crime), but I'm not sure about apprehending.

      So, if you're saying that since action A is a tort, therefore similar action B should be a felony, you're stupider than the "delinquents".

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    2. Re:Morons don't learn quicklly by mbeckman · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of curtilage trespass -- not entrance into a residence. Walking into someone's yard that is posted "no trespassing" is indeed a misdemeanor. But in many states, including liberal California, if you commit what is known as "aggravated trespass" by entering into someone's home without permission, and the resident feels bodily threatened, you can face felony trespass charges. This could mean a jail sentence of sixteen months or up to three years. The threatened resident can also shoot you under the Castle doctrine (California Penal Code Section 198.5). The threatened resident is not required to retreat, and can even chase you and use deadly force to neutralize the threat. And if they manage to just hold you for police, you are still subject to felony trespass charges. What's more, the threat can have been made any time in the preceding 30 days. It need not occur during the trespass.

      So death or prison are your options. Only a moron would choose this.

  80. What SHOULD have happened... by jonwil · · Score: 2

    What SHOULD have happened in this case is that the kid should have been given a few days of detention. All of the teachers should have been made to change their passwords, not type them in when students can see and not let students use them. And the student body should have been given a warning that anyone caught messing with the computers or using the teachers passwords will get a few days detention.

    If the same student re-offends (and continues to mess with the computers) they can then be given a suspension.

    1. Re:What SHOULD have happened... by bledri · · Score: 1

      OK, I hate our draconian "tough on crime" bullshit and ridiculous "cyber crime" laws. But the summary left off some important information. He'd been busted for this before (WTF school, change your passwords) and:

      Green was released on Wednesday from Land O'Lakes Detention Center into the custody of his mother. He'll likely be granted pretrial intervention by a judge, sheriff's detective Anthony Bossone said. Green also received a 10-day school suspension. It's unclear if he'll return to Paul R. Smith to complete the school year after the suspension.

      So basically their just giving him a good scare.

      --
      Some privacy policy Slashdot.
  81. Re:Corporate Diversity? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    Of course, the fact that "prison with corporate sponsorship?" was even a reasonable possibility is pretty fucking sad in and of itself.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  82. Strike Two. by westlake · · Score: 2

    It shouldn't even be a criminal charge. It may be a crime by the letter of the law, but c'mon, this couldn't be handled in-house?!

    Green had previously received a three-day suspension for accessing the system inappropriately.

    Green was released on Wednesday from Land O'Lakes Detention Center into the custody of his mother. He'll likely be granted pretrial intervention by a judge, sheriff's detective Anthony Bossone said.

    Green also received a 10-day school suspension. It's unclear if he'll return to Paul R. Smith to complete the school year after the suspension.

    Middle school student charged with cybercrime in Holiday

    Individuals who successfully complete a Pretrial Intervention Program will have their criminal charges dismissed.

    Pretrial Intervention is for first offenders charged with third degree misdemeanors or felonies. Violate your PTI and you will be looking at a very pissed off judge and prosecutor.

    Understanding Florida's Pre-Trial Intervention Program

  83. Re:Jury nullification exists because... by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 1

    Jury nullification is a side effect of the prohibition against retrying a defendant for the same crime after having been found not guilty

    This prohibition is important because, at least in theory, it prevents a determined prosecutor from repeatedly retrying until there is a conviction, the defendant caves or the prosecutor gets tired. Of course, it's not impossible to get around this by filing charges for other things the defendant might have done at the same time. In theory, the defendant or defendant's lawyer could argue these new charges are "lessor included charges" and get them dismissed.

    --
    Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
  84. Hacking Lesson 1 by koan · · Score: 1

    Keep your mouth shut.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  85. Why? by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Why didn't they just shoot him in the back? Will that be tomorrows story?

  86. Actually, this varies by state... by jsrjsr · · Score: 1

    In Wisconsin, a police officer can interrogate a student who is a minor all he wants unless the student is a suspect, the school district has a policy forbidding it, or the parent is present (and objects). I was surprised to discover this when my son was questioned as a witness before anyone said anything to us about it. My son came home and struggled a bit with explaining that he was questioned by the police. My son has comprehension problems (he's getting better) and I don't think he really understood what was going on.

    1. Re: Actually, this varies by state... by rezme · · Score: 1

      In Florida, the school administrator takes the role of parent, without even bothering to notify the actual parent. My son got busted with a bag of weed at school (dumbass), and the first I heard of it was a phone call from the principal saying "your kid is on his way to jail, you should probably head over there and see if you can bail him out". Of course, I left his ass in there until I finished with work, headed home, ate dinner, chilled with the wife for a bit... finally got him around midnight. If it'd been me, and my dad in the same scenario, I'd hadn't been out of school for a week while he let me cool my heels in there.

  87. Hey! I graduated from High School in 1976... by jsrjsr · · Score: 1

    ...and I could tell how I got kicked off the school's timeshare account. It was my partner-in-crime who got us caught. Oh, yeah, I almost forgot -- GET OFF MY LAWN!!!

  88. Re:They have to do something to keep the prisons f by Xyrus · · Score: 1

    This is Florida, correct? Isn't their system something like:

    1. YELLATUM!
    2. GETEMRUNNIN!
    3. CHUTUM!
    4. DONCHATALKERBUTGLABALWURMIN!

    --
    ~X~
  89. Re:Unauthorized access is illegal. Period. by Chalnoth · · Score: 1

    This was less of a crime than hiding a bucket of water over a door for the teacher to walk through. Charging a kid with a felony is vastly disproportionate to the crime committed.

  90. Jury nullification is good by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 1

    The first supreme court justice John Jay said to vote your conscience. The people themselves are final check against stupid laws.

  91. Religous freedom by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 1

    This isn't funny. This student violated his teacher's religious freedom.

  92. Re:Unauthorized access is illegal. Period. by Perky_Goth · · Score: 1

    Sure, it's illegal, if if there's no intention to cause harm to anyone, what's the point of severely punishing him?

  93. You people are bat shit crazy by Skylinux · · Score: 1

    You people are bat shit crazy.

    Singed, the rest of the western world.

    --
    Everyone who buys Wild Hunt will receive 16 specially prepared DLCs absolutely for free, regardless of platform.
  94. Job interview by davidwr · · Score: 1

    I'm imagining a job interview with this guy in 15-20 years.

    "So, have you ever been arrested?"
    "Yes, once when I was 14"
    "So what did you do?"
    "I changed my teachers wallpaper on his computer to a couple of gay guys kissing."
    "LOL, good job. I see you have a sense of humor. You're hired, but if you ever do that to my computer I'll fire your ass, okay?"

    Sadly, when they get to the "have you ever been convicted of a felony" question, a lot of employers are forced to say "sorry, we aren't allowed to hire you for this position due to legal/contractual/insurance-carrier requirements". But that's a discussion for another time.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  95. Florida Schools/Cops by bobf0648 · · Score: 1

    Must not be enough murders, rapes or cop shootings, had to find something to do.

  96. What this kids learned is that by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

    Every adult he's encountered from his teachers to the sheriff are idiots and liars, not to be trusted.

  97. The teacher is who should be punished by JohnBailey7959 · · Score: 1

    The kid should be rewarded for exposing their dumb ass security and the teacher should be fired for being too stupid to be teaching anyone.

  98. Out of the box by NewYork · · Score: 1

    "If you THINK out of the box, you'll be prosecuted/punished" --Any Regime

  99. The first shots are fired by Gallomimia · · Score: 1

    Let the war begin!

    --
    Sadly, a Libertarian cannot force his views on another, and freedom cannot spread as does the cancer known as religion.
  100. Old world thinking is the real crime here by Zeekort · · Score: 1

    A: Teachers are end users and should NOT be local admins on their PCs OR have network admin rights EVER. Yes, even the computer teachers.

    B: A password policy in which teachers are allowed to use their last name should not be allowed in the first place.

    C: When the hell are the END USERS going to be held responsible for their OWN stupidity? This is the 21st century. Computers are a part of everyone's life now. Ignorance is NOT an excuse. It's slowly getting better but no where near where it should be as this situation shows.

    D: The kid isn't innocent, but at most he should be getting detention or some other punishment that would actually teach why using someone else's account is a no-no. Kids will be kids and they need to have boundaries, but not the overreaction he got. I seriously doubt that the people that are overreacting to this and throwing the book at him were perfect saints when they were kids and some of them may have been doing something worse than changing a desktop wallpaper.

    E: The ONLY real crime here is that this school district is supposed to be teaching and preparing their kids for life in the 21st century and they are severely unqualified as shown by their bad security habits.

    F: I don't care of the school doesn't have a lot of money to spend on having a proper IT setup. Find a way to make it work. It's inexcusable for any entity (especially a school) to not have the basics covered now that we're 15 years in to the 21 century. If you need equipment cheap, reach out to businesses in the area. Many (like the organization I work for) donate old hardware. If you need software, Microsoft has options specifically for schools and even if that is too expensive, there are other platforms that will work (Linux, Mac, etc).

    End of line