Slashdot Mirror


The Do-It-All Remote?

MisterFig asks: "I, like many of you, have too many remote controls to know what to do with. One for the TV, the VCR, the Receiver, the CD player, the Cable box... you get the drift. I don't mind using them all, but is there an easier way? Sure, there are so called "Universal" remotes. But I find these often provide a very limited set of functionality for usually only a subset of my devices. Each remote has it's own special buttons and features that a Universal remote doesn't know about. So I am stuck keeping all the remotes out. Can one remote do it all? I recently came across an add for the Harman Kardon "Take Control". This is a cool remote control that is software programmable, looks really easy to use and supposedly can be programmed to do everything each of your current remotes do. Could it be? A single remote control that can control everything? It's laid out in such a way that you have activities, like "watch tv", "play a cd" or "watch a video". Clicking on the activity will setup the entertainment center to a predefined state of your choosing. This sounds too good to be true! However, it's about $300. Is it worth it? Has anyone used one of these? Are there any other remotes out there that can control everything? Including all the special buttons/features that each of the individual remotes have? " Can it be? An All-In-One remote that claims it actually WORKS?

239 comments

  1. Palm-remore by chargen · · Score: 1

    There's a program for the palm pilot called omniremote I believe, it's awesome and AFAIK can handle any kind of IR signal.

    1. Re:Palm-remore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      likewise, there is a universal remote program for the color gameboy.

    2. Re:Palm-remore by miahrogers · · Score: 1

      Omni-Remote is a nice idea, but it doesn't work well. I can use it to change all the channels on my tv, volume etc. but it refuses to turn my tv on, so you have to use the other remote. Plus it isn't freeware, and i don't have anymoney so i'm stuck with the sucky demo version.

      I still haven't found a freeware program that does the same, but i'm sure it would be a quick weekend hack to put one together(Really just copying the ir input and reflecting it to output).

      matisse:~$ cat .sig

    3. Re:Palm-remore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, I thought this was gonna be the greatest thing but I was really disapointed as well when I tried it. The IR is too weak and the palm screen doesn't compare to real buttons.

    4. Re:Palm-remore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried Omni Remote and it wouldnt recognize one of my Remotes (apparently it operates at an IR Freq other than those it scans and I couldnt find any labelling that said what it might be)

    5. Re:Palm-remore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not necessarily true. it takes a great deal of timing to analyze ir signals properly. the hp48 remote control program had a better solution: understand the protocol and synthesize the codes. less memory, more reliable

    6. Re:Palm-remore by GnrcMan · · Score: 2

      Wow...that brings back memories. In '95, when I was in college, I bought an HP 48GX, in hopes that my boring math classes could get done with more quickly...Needless to say, it didn't work, the 48GX was simply an expensive vehicle to play Tetris on during math class. Anyway, I remember downloading the remote control program. It was neat except they disabled the IR so that you could only transmit a short distance, to curtail cheating.

      Anyway, does anyone remember the "Tricorder" program for the HP? It would beep more quickly based on the proximity of the IR sensor to some mildly reflective surface. That was mildly amusing. A fun processor to hack on too!

      --GnrcMan--

    7. Re:Palm-remore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its a good idea, but the IR beam gets about 6 feet of range. Is there any way to amplify this IR signal? The remote program is also capable of opening locked cars. You know the "keyless entry" remotes that use IR signals to unlock/lock/alarm cars? Train one of those into your Palm, you'll be surprised.

    8. Re:Palm-remore by Nexx · · Score: 1

      Just to be a snob....
      on my parents' '97 Mercedes C280, the thing only works once. The keychain must have an internal clock in it, so it transmits the timestamp to the car. The car knows that any subsequent signals must be from a later time, so the signal only works once. Of course, you only need to open the doors once, so.....

    9. Re:Palm-remore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also open cars with IR locks.... Isn't NZ PC World, Dumb Terminal page wonderful?

    10. Re:Palm-remore by underclocked · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised those crazy folks at x-10 haven't gotten on the ball an created an "Do-it-all" remote; but wait, that's not IR (oops)

      The ir ports on Palm Pilots aren't quite strong enough for effective remotes. My friend's Casiopia (sp?) has better range. I'm assuming the Phillips brand stuff is pretty good too (refers to thier commercials)

      Most of those IR ports are made for data transfer, not long range bursts like remotes are used to.

    11. Re:Palm-remore by croe · · Score: 1
      The folks at X10 do have an all-in-one remote... Actually they have two or three.

      I actually bought one, that also controls my mouse. I haven't yet been able to get it to do everything it can do with my computer. And well, I'll say it still doesn't do EVERYTHING that the OEM remotes do...

      For example it can bring up the on-screen menu on the TV, but that's all... with regards to the menu, it'll do everything else though, flip channels, change volume, flashback, etc...

      Oh well nothing is perfect...

    12. Re:Palm-remore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh? IR remotes on cars? I thought they were all RF.

    13. Re:Palm-remore by Brew+Bird · · Score: 1

      The X-10 Programable IR remote worked well for me...
      now if only the PC remote had programable IR...
      mmmmmmm

    14. Re:Palm-remore by bjorky · · Score: 1

      The people who make the tale-light device make an IR blaster which is supposed to increase the range up to 30 feet. It plugs in to the serial port.

      --

      "Defenestration" is to throw out of a window; what's a word for throwing 'Windows' out of something?
  2. URL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there a URL for this?

    1. Re:URL? by Vertigo1 · · Score: 1
      --
      That darn Slashdot is so cool... Hey did you pay the phone *(#(Q%$#$ NO CARRIER
  3. ... by Signal+11 · · Score: 3
    It's called a palm pilot. It has a programmable IR port. All you need to do is make an interface that records the on-off sequence and delay (short or long) and can then repeat it. This is trivial to do even without a CPU.

    I did some experiments a long time ago back with electronics (back when I knew what a 555 IC was... heh), and I took a remote and a IR phototransistor and hooked it to an LED so I could see what it was transmitting. Almost all remotes use a system similar to morse code - that is short and long pulses seperated by a specific interval of dark.

    In principal any device which can record and play back IR signals could be used as a remote. Infact, the industry has a fairly standard set of signals to send to/from your TV - just get a all-in-one remote and look at the guide. Manufacturers document all of this. The problem is with non-standard features like "still frame" in VCRs. Play, record, stop, ff, rewind, those are all standard. Things like accessing the TV's internal "menu" system isn't.

    Hope this helps..



    --
    1. Re:... by Forward+The+Light+Br · · Score: 2

      hehehe jinx, (we posted in sync)

      one comment (in addition rather)

      it appears that there is no software to make the Palm do this at this time

      This is NOT to say that the palm cannot; the ability is out-of-box;

      rather there are no apps right now that will give you a nice gui to use, and handle said signals... right now you would need to roll your own...

      if any readers end up writing one, please post it to freshmeat and palm central (and any other good palm sites)

      (freshmeat is not one, but we linux folk would like to buy you a beer as well ;-)
      We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars --Oscar Wilde

      --

      Grrr. my nick is "Forward the Light Brigade"...
    2. Re:... by MbM · · Score: 1

      omniremote for the palmpilot -
      http://pacificneoteck.com
      - MbM

      --
      - MbM
  4. What I want... by j+a+w+a+d · · Score: 1

    What I want from a remote is an LCD panel, and a cursor, and a "select" button. The LCD panel can display the different buttons, and ONLY the relevant buttons. I hate having buttons for features I'll need once, but I also hate not having a button when I need it.

    I think Microsoft makes a remote like this.. *duck*

    --
    i dont display scores, and my threshhold is -1. post accordingly.
    Discuss /. policies
    1. Re:What I want... by j+a+w+a+d · · Score: 1

      Found it!

      It's called the Microsoft Universal Take Control Remote, made in conjunction with Harman International.

      http://www.micro soft.com/products/hardware/takecontrol/default.htm

      --
      i dont display scores, and my threshhold is -1. post accordingly.
      Discuss /. policies
    2. Re:What I want... by sugarman · · Score: 1

      http://www.microsoft.com/products/hardware/takecon trol/default.htm

      I hope I'm not the only one who finds that complete pathname kind of humorous and ironic at the same time?

      M$ => "Our mission statements are in our URL's"

      --
      --sugarman--
    3. Re:What I want... by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      So, you want the Star Trek display panels that only display the relevant buttons for the present activity? :-)

      - Michael T. Babcock <homepage>

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    4. Re:What I want... by MammyNun · · Score: 1

      I have tried them all: Sony, Philips...

      But none of them learns my Bang&Olufsen remote commands ...

      Does anybody know about a learnable remote that does learn everything?

    5. Re:What I want... by POttedPOrk · · Score: 1

      Saw on the linux IR project somewhere that the B&O remotes use some funky bi-directional protocol, and there isn't a way for learning remotes to simulate this.

      Don't remember the URL tho, it's kinda lost in the mists of time.

    6. Re:What I want... by MammyNun · · Score: 1
      The bi-directionality is configurable and can be disabled.

      What fills me with hope is, that the PalmPilot can understand the B&O IR commands... it's just a little to weak to reproduce them unless you are in front of the TV.

    7. Re:What I want... by dublin · · Score: 2

      If you've got B&O gear in the first place it's hard to feel sorry for you...

      Still, this is why I didn't buy a B&O rig several years ago. Although they used to have the best remotes on the planet, they are decidedly behind the times now, and have been for several years.

      B&O's IR remotes work quite differently from the garden variety, but they definitely have a superior architecture (as usual for them...)

      There are two things that make B&O remotes fundamentally different: First, the carrier frequency is *much* higher (400 KHz vs. 40 KHz, IIRC), giving the opportunity for far higher data rates. Second, the protocol allows for 2-way communication, so the CD player, for instance, can display the title of the track playing on the remote itself.

      So far as I know, there's no learning remote out there that's capable of sampling quickly enough to snarf B&O remote codes.

      And of course, B&O asumes if you can afford any of their gear, then everything in your house will be theirs, so their remotes (at least last time I checked) don't have the ability to control non-B&O gear, either. Bummer.

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  5. I hate to break it to you, but I believe that remote runs WinCE...

    if that is ok with you, well this remote is not vaporware, I have a friend who worked for MS who saw them floating around (hardware beta testing) before he left (he no longer works there )

    otherwise, both the palm and the HP-48x graphing calculators can be made to do this...

    it is considerably easier to do this with the palm, including programming it, as its development is considerably easier than WinCE...

    just an FYI
    We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars --Oscar Wilde

    --

    Grrr. my nick is "Forward the Light Brigade"...
    1. Re:hmmmm by Foos · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the HP-48x calculators infrared ports don't have a very big range, something on the order of 18 inches or so. :(

      --
      :wq
    2. Re:hmmmm by copito · · Score: 2

      There's a resistor you can replace to increase the receive range. The transmit range is several feet, so it's enough for couch to TV if the TV is sensitive enough. I couldn't find any info on increasing transmit power, although I remember a discussion on /., possibly the one in http://slashdot.org/articles/98 /11/21/0958242.shtml but the relavent comments seem to have disappeared (the thread is visible but the comments are empty). One readable post does recommend the HP48G/GX for it's sending range.

      BTW, if you want to open up your HP48, see http://www.contrib.andr ew.cmu.edu/~drury/oldhp/how2open.htm first.
      --

      --
      "L'IT c'est moi!"
    3. Re:hmmmm by tomk · · Score: 1

      Actually, only the infrared receiver is limited. The transmitter works as well as any of the other remotes I own.

      Unfortunately, my HP-48GX can't seem to "learn" the remote codes for any of my Pioneer stereo equipment (though it does work for my TV and VCR)

      -TomK

    4. Re:hmmmm by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Heh. Wince on a remote. Not only will you have to find a $300 remote, but every time you're finished, you have to charge it (lest the next day it'll leave you stuck on a pro-MS channel). I dunno, but having to nightly charge/change batteries weekly defeats the purpose of a remote.

  6. i hate to tell you this but... by linuxbert · · Score: 1

    i thought you should no that said harrmon/kardon remote runs a microsoft product...
    yep thats right, its a basterd sibbling of WinCE

    1. Re:i hate to tell you this but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phillips Magnavox makes a nice one that looks pretty much like a palmpilot- check it http://www.pronto.philips.com/

    2. Re:i hate to tell you this but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so?? As long as a product works well, does it matter where it comes from?

    3. Re:i hate to tell you this but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      >As long as a product works well, does it matter where it comes from?

      To me yes. Here's why:

      Not that Microsoft is 100% in this category, but *I* have never felt good about buying goods Made in China, no matter how good they are. If a company's (or country's) activities (or lack of activities) affect my conscience enough, sometimes I feel I must make a small personal stand.

      There are times people decide to do things that are against logic. I guess wince isn't your "thing". I'm gonna bet there's something you won't buy on principle... fur coats (dead animals)? furby dolls (slave labour)? nike shoes (child labour)? McDonald's burgers (rain-forest deforestation)? Nuclear Power (chernobyl)? a company that once screwed you over in the past?

      If you never, ever, in your life decide to make even a small stand against a product or service even once, then might I suggest you seek professional help... It's only human to make an illogical decision based on feelings sometimes. Suppressing such feelings forever might just turn ya nuts (maybe make you postal?).

      Maybe MS and wince just isn't your thing. Sorry you feel this way ;-)

    4. Re:i hate to tell you this but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're exactly f*cking right. also, i'm damn near sick of slashdot's product plugs disguised as "ask slashdot" features. give me: msdn.microsoft.com any day. at least they admit that they're trying to push products.

  7. Sony Universal Remote Control by PotPieMan · · Score: 1

    I got a catalog a while ago called "Sony Xtras Direct" or something. They have a sweet-looking remote control with a huge LCD that they claim is "a programmable, teachable remote" that can "control up to 12 different items, including teaching it to recall multiple command sequences with a single touch." They have a website, http://www.sony.com/direct/, but I haven't looked for it there. The quoted price is $179.99. I would think it's worth looking into, given the one you're talking about it quite a bit more expensive.

    1. Re:Sony Universal Remote Control by Danchez · · Score: 1

      Specifically here

      --Dan

    2. Re:Sony Universal Remote Control by elljay · · Score: 1

      I've had one of these. It works EXCELLENT for the devices it's preprogrammed for. But in learning mode it has quite a lot to be desired. It would execute the command correctly once, then wouldn't twice, then again right. It's just not reliable for all those 'strange' keys. -Oh I'm a Lumberjack and I'm OK! I sleep all night and I work all day!
      -lj 'Oh I'm a Lumberjack and I'm OK!

    3. Re:Sony Universal Remote Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have one of them. It's called the Remote Commander. Picked mine up at Good Guys for $149US. It's got physical buttons to select ten devices (one of them is reserved for non-AV type use--the docs use an air conditioner it its examples). Also buttons for volume, channel, mute, remote ON/OFF, backlit display, and three macros. Each system button brings a virtual remote onto a LCD touchscreen. The functions of the virtual buttons are programmed through predefined remote codes, or you can have any individual button "learn" a function. Not all remotes have been defined in the codes, so you have to get creative when build a custom virtual remote. The AT&T Digital Cable remote is a fun example :)
      The macro buttons are cool! You basically script out what you want them to do by pressing the other key sequences. With racks of equipment, it definitely comes in handy. My macro#1 turns everything on. The other two change to and return from DVD mode (where the TV, Amp and switch all change modes to use the SVIDEO lines).
      High on my recommendation list! It uses (ten?) AA batteries grouped into two sections covering functions and backlit display. The remote is a little on the heavy side, but it's also a great conversation piece. People WILL call you a geek! :)

    4. Re:Sony Universal Remote Control by BigJimD · · Score: 1

      I bought one of these from Computability for $129. It was nice, but had one MAJOR (for me) drawback. It will not control any of the Sony VisionTouch products. (And nowhere in the literature, manual, or box is this mentioned.) Only a call to Sony Tech Service revealed this shortcoming. I would have thought that Sony's latest and greatest remote would control their own A/V Receivers-but it won't. Computability charged me 5% restocking to return it as well.

  8. possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    while i havent used this one a few years back i had a programable remote
    that you aimed the original remote
    at the base of it and programmed keys to store the code for each function
    it even had a macro settup it worked great!!!!
    was only like $40
    I cant recall who it was made by at the moment
    It got lost in a move and i havent been able to find one like it since:{:{:{:{
    so yes it can be done!

    1. Re:possible by dbarron · · Score: 1

      Actually, I bought just such a beast (with the macro keys and all) as a Univeral All in One. It works great for my VCR, TV, Satellite, and Stereo. It's brand marked (just looked) as Cinema-6. Seems to work fine and it CAN learn new commands from your old remotes, though I haven't needed to do that. Even like smart sound and the TV's menu system are on the buttons already there (they may not make much sense (the smart sound is the surround sound button...well that's sort of right)). Anyway, it was only $22 at Wal-Mart.

    2. Re:possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Radio Shack.

  9. Two types of universal remotes by Keelor · · Score: 2
    I don't have all the applicable information on hand, nor the article that I remember reading this in (though I think it might be at the Equip magazine site) but there are two types of programmable remotes. One type is the type that most people hear about that have a few hundred "presets" that try to emulate every proprietary remote on the market. The disadvantage, like was mentioned, is that these don't always have _every_ feature. Also, as soon as a new feature comes along, the remote becomes obsolete.

    That is why no true techie should ever buy that type of remote. The _real_ universal remote is programmable. The average lay-person is completely confused by these, as they require you to sit with all of your remotes and send the IR signal to the remote so that it can learn the appropriate signal. Hence, these remotes are generally classified as learning remotes. The down-side? Well, the learning remote has no error-checking, so "Volume up" could get programmed as "Turn on the toaster", given the right equipment. That's not a problem for most semi-knowledgable techies, though. The other downside is that, unlike preset remotes, you need a working original remote to begin. This could be a problem if you're looking for a new remote because the last one was crushed by your 2-ton Lego Mindstorms robot.

    It sounds like the remote you're looking at is a learning remote. I don't know anything about that one in particular off-hand, but you should be able to comparison shop the multiple learning remotes. I know there are decent articles about this--I'll try to find one and post a reply in this message about it.

    ~=Keelor

    1. Re:Two types of universal remotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think a true hacker has a love/hate relationship with pre-programmed remotes. They're good cause:

      - You can use a set of pre-programmed codes to control the IRMAN, or a similar device. If you have to point the other remote at the device, why bother?
      - If you get a piece of equipment from the dumpster, and fix it, you can use the preprogrammed remote to replace the "lost" one.
      - They're so cheap, they're almost like party favours

      They suck because:

      - You usually can't upgrade 'em.
      - If your code isn't avaliable, you're screwed
      - You don't always get all the buttons

      Oh well, what can you do?

    2. Re:Two types of universal remotes by sec · · Score: 1

      Well, you don't necessarily need a working _original_ remote.

      If you have a piece of equipment without a remote, you can always pick up one of those pre-programmed ones (they're cheap like borcht these days) and use it to program the monkey-see-monkey-do remote.

    3. Re:Two types of universal remotes by adolf · · Score: 2

      There's quite a few "serious" programmable hand-held remotes out there -- seems every audio company that's putting their fingers into the home theater market has one (Sony, H-K, Rotel, Onkyo, Marantz, B&K, Carver, and so forth). Some of these are all but incapable of reliably learning codes; others get them right most of the time; none of them get it right all of the time. That said, once the codes are learned, they'll always work. Rather, they'll always work, *if* they've got enough memory to store all of the codes for all of your gear (no good way of determining that without actually trying it).

      Many of the more expensive ones use an LCD touch panel. Some of these emulate a hands-on remote (which is silly), while others allow placement and shapes of buttons to be minutely tuned. Still others only have an LCD for clock display, and others still have no LCD at all.

      What to do? Depends on how much you like the the toys your equipment has. At the low end, Radio Shack has a learning remote that also has preprogrammed codes (which is a good thing, as it's only got enough memory for about one full keypad of codes - you'd be lucky to get two devices into it if neither worked out-of-the-box). It's around $20, and also works with X10 stuff such as the Firecracker kit that Slashdot is still in bed with.

      On the other end of the price spectrum exists Crestron, who makes incredibly serious gear. You get to create your own interface (sadly, using Windows software) and write some code to run it that runs on a large, black, rack-mount box. Plugged into this box can be almost anything - a Matrix Orbital RS-232 keypad would not be out of the question. Or an RF reciever, snagging control codes out of the air from a wireless backlit 256 color LCD panel. And light control? It wouldn't take much doing in order to get it to talk DMX-512 over RS-485, such that you can plug in your choice of professional halogen light dimmers or pretty effects lighting for your next party or stadium gig. One word of caution, though - Crestron does not list prices on their site for a reason.

      Xantech has a few serious remote control systems (mostly geared toward permanent installation), and is the behind-the-scenes manufacturer for a large percentage of IR equipment.

      Me, I can't afford a Crestron system, Xantech is too inconveniently yuppie for my taste (though I do use a remote repeater system of theirs, and our host Rob has one of their ground loop eliminators hung off of his VCR), and the cheaper LCD panel remotes seem flaky and cheap. So, I use a couple of things (depending on my mood and/or how involved I want to be with button-pushing).

      Firstly is a Rotel RR920 learning remote. They don't make it anymore :^), but it works wonders. A large, geekish array of buttons with equally geekish labels (what did they intend the BEQ button to do, anyway? I've got it running the TV's sleep timer), and I've never come close to running out of memory with it. It supports lengthy macros, and has an LCD clock (which can also trigger said macros). List price was $150, iirc.
      No pre-programmed codes, so you're on your own if you've lost the original remote.

      I've also got the aforementioned Radio Shack remote. It doesn't do as much, but does have a glow in the dark button you can push to light up the keypad. I keep it by the bed to turn the lights on and off with X10. For each bank of buttons, there's a few (usually) unassigned keys that you can learn arbitrary commands into. And, the pre-programmed codes aren't complete shit - it does every feature of my DSS equipment, and formerly did the Primestar boxen without complaint. But, it has no codes for my Carver CD player or Rotel preamp, and its poor little memory got filled up rather quickly because of that.

      Whatever you get, it'd serve you well to buy from a place with a liberal return policy. Some of these things will not do what you expect (never trust the packaging), and there's some devices (such as a Samsung TV that I have) which no third-party remote can control (except a Crestron system, which just doesn't care how funky the remote's signal is; it will duplicate it).

  10. Philips Pronto is the way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Philips Pronto is the mother of all remote controls. Check: www.philipsmagnavox.com This remote does it all: you can design your own user interface on the PC and download your creation into the remote. It is simply great!

    1. Re:Philips Pronto is the way to go by zempf · · Score: 1

      Wow, that is quite nice, but isn't $400 a little steep for a programmable remote control? I mean, for that price, couldn't you go out & buy an older Palm? You could use it not only as a programmable universal remote, but for all those other neat things Palms do. You could even put some games on it when there's nothing good on TV (or use it for that 'productivity' crap).

      -mike kania

    2. Re:Philips Pronto is the way to go by Rambo · · Score: 1

      "but isn't $400 a little steep for a programmable remote control? I mean, for that price, couldn't you go out & buy an older Palm?"

      Uhhh for $400 you could buy the nicest palm out there-- the Vx. Or two visors, providing you could actually get them shipped to you successfully. And had the patience to order and reorder (rinse and repeat) until they arrived...

    3. Re:Philips Pronto is the way to go by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2
      I suppose, but:
      • Pronto's screen is larger and it has additional buttons for controls (vol+/-, chan+/-, left and right)
      • It has a super-powerful IR element with like a 30'+ range or something. I doubt the Pilot's more than 10' (the Newton IR never guaranteed AV control over 6'!)
      • 4AA batteries (or desktop charger) mean that it has power for months. See how long those AAAs run your IR emitter constantly.
      • The ProntoEdit IDE is powerful and simple IMO, and though I haven't seen the palm-based stuff I can't imagine it getting any easier or more powerful than PE.
      • the Pronto has a game Easter Egg in it, so if there's nothing good on TV you can play Tetris.. With the larger screen ;)


      Yeah, when it came out, it was $400, but nowadays it'll cost less and come with a recharger.. Personally, I think mine was worth it, and you can have it when you pry it from my cold dead fingers.. ;)
      Your Working Boy,
    4. Re:Philips Pronto is the way to go by vanyel · · Score: 1

      I have a Pronto and I've never been sorry. The software is great, there's lots of samples at remotecentral.com and it just works. Some friends tried to use a pilot, and the IR just doesn't cut it, even with an aftermarket booster.

    5. Re:Philips Pronto is the way to go by whoop · · Score: 1

      I've gotta ask it but, is there any open source software to download the data to the device? They're wanting a damned user/pass to go to the download area, so I haven't gotten much further. I presume the software is for Win95, and there's an Apple logo on that page. (What do you know, cypherpunk worked...)

      Hmm, I haven't tried anything, but I believe VMware can access the ports directly. Anyone out there done something like that? But still, it would be immensely easier to use normal apps in Linux. The last thing I want to do is setup '95 on a spare PC just to program the darned thing. :) Hey, people figured out the Mindstorm's transmitting scheme, so hopefully...

    6. Re:Philips Pronto is the way to go by Jamie+Zawinski · · Score: 2
      Uhhh for $400 you could buy the nicest palm out there-- the Vx. Or two visors, providing you could actually get them shipped to you successfully. And had the patience to order and reorder (rinse and repeat) until they arrived...

      First of all, it's not really $400, that's the list price; you can get them for half that.

      Second, yes, you could get a nice Palm for that price. And I'd consider doing that, just as soon as someone demonstrates to me that a Palm will work as well as this remote does, in terms of ease-of-programmability, ability to memorize codes of other remote controls, and broadcast range.

      (And don't tell me "just solder in a new resistor." Please.)

      You're not paying for a Palm clone here, folks. You're paying for both hardware and software. You're paying for a solution to a particular problem in a particular niche. If someone has a software-only solution, I'd like to see it. But to my knowlege it doesn't exist.

      I can't emphasize enough how well the Pronto actually works .

      I've used many programmable remotes over the last decade, and they all suck! The Pronto is the first I've used that actually does what I want it to do, and so I consider it a bargain at just about any price...

  11. Other Remotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marantz as had an "all-in-one" (a "learning" remote) for a few years. The model I have is the RC 2000, which can operate 10 devices and contains "soft pages" for programming special functions. It can also be setup with macros to do a string of commands like 1.) turn on TV 2.) turn on preamp/amp 3.) turn on VCR 4.) play vcr tape, etc. The Marantz's are/were running around US $250.

    1. Re:Other Remotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also have a Marantz RC2000 Mark II Remote Control and it kicks ass!!! It automaticly aluminates itself when you pick it up, but only when it is dark in the room. It has programable macros, I can turn all of my componets with one button push. And it has and LCD screen with programable menus for all your other remotes special features. I highly recomend it if the best is what you want.

  12. Get non-Wince version, or get a Learning remote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe the Phillips version runs their own OS, NOT WinCE (which supposedly does crash often, and needs to get reloaded from your PC). The other thing you should look at is a "Learning Remote". The Marantz one looks pretty nice, and I think you can digitally label the buttons for each setup. (i.e. different layouts and labels for Home Theater, VCR, etc). Just a thought.

    1. Re:Get non-Wince version, or get a Learning remote by Fringe · · Score: 1
      The Marantz one IS the Pronto. Same company, same body, largely the same software.



      I had heard, though, that they do run WinCE. I don't know how to verify this.

    2. Re:Get non-Wince version, or get a Learning remote by Jamie+Zawinski · · Score: 2
      The Marantz one IS the Pronto. Same company, same body, largely the same software.

      I had heard, though, that they do run WinCE. I don't know how to verify this.

      I would assume that if the Pronto was running Wince, there would be a Microsoft logo in the manual somewhere. There's not.

      It doesn't feel Wincey. E.g., there's no Start button...

      But then, I've seen a lot of ATMs and other kiosks crashed to NT lately. Oh for the good old days when one only saw them crashed to DOS!

  13. $20 remote with macros by HarveyOpolis · · Score: 1

    I believe it's called the One4All Theatre or something similar.

    It's a great remote, a friend of mine recommended to me. It's programmable to hold six devices, and can learn functions from other remotes.

    Plus it has several user definable macros that allow you to turn on the receiver, tv, and dvd player (in a certain order) with one click. Can also change the channel to channel 4 or make your tv go to input 1 or something.

    I know someone else with one of the $300 Sony remotes (came with his receiver though), it is basically a 5 line LCD with a scroll up/down thingie... the rest of the buttons are hidden. It's a great remote, if you can afford it, especially when you lose it in the seat cushions.

    --
    - Hugh Buchanan
    - Userfriendly.com
  14. X10 Remote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but can it control your lights/linux box??!?!?!

    1. Re:X10 Remote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I recently picked up an 8in1 learning remote from x10.com

      It was able to learn the commands for my Princeton 29" presentation monitor that I use in the living room which no programmable remote could handle, handles the sattelite dish and vcr great from 30' away and was only $25. It even has a button that causes all the buttons to glow red in the dark :)

      Now I just have to figure out how to program the ir-port on my laptop to control the mp3-player with the remote...

    2. Re:X10 Remote by lithis · · Score: 1

      the x10 learning remote is awesome! i got mine for free thanks to one of x10.com's promo offers, and it's better than any "universal" remote i've ever used... the glow-in-the dark and light-up features just make it all the cooler :7

      i was thinking of using it to control my laptop via the ir port as well... i don't know much about the port, but i'm sure you could do some really awesome stuff with it. the x10 learning remote is definately the remote for the job.

    3. Re:X10 Remote by dozing · · Score: 1

      I'm glad someone finnaly mentioned X10. I purchased the X10 programmable super remote on sale for about $25 and not only can i program it for ANY infared device, but I can also turn on/off lights appliance or anything else I can dream of.

      you can check it out at http://www.x10.com They even have free shipping.

      Dozing
      Webmaster for Dozing's Entertainment Warehouse
      http://www.dozings.com/

      --
      Dozings.com -- Its kinda funny... If you're as crazy as me.
    4. Re:X10 Remote by Medieval · · Score: 1

      The X-10 super remote coupled with one of the boxes that has a two way serial interface, you can set up one of several linux boxes to watch line activity and trap certain unit codes and act upon them. For instance, I have my machine set up to trap house code A for actual modules, and house code B has no actual physical modules, it watches for house code B unit 1 commands for forward/reverse and unit 2 for stop and play on mpg123. House code B unit 8 is trapped also, sending 3 unit 8 offs in a row makes the machine reboot. Pretty spiffy. :P

  15. Old news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This remote has been around for over a year now if I am not mistaken... Same as the more superior Philips Pronto. If you're going to spend the money, the Pronto is the better remote.

  16. Check out High-End A/V dealers by JoeShmoe · · Score: 2

    I wish I could remember the name, but there is a terrific system that is used in a lot of the conference rooms where I work.

    Basically, you have a touch-screen pad that has an RF transmitter. The RF transmitter communicates with a box that you put near your A/V equipment. The box has a series of wires running out of it. At the end of each wire is an IR transmitter. You velcro the transmitter near the IR window on the device you want to control and run the wire back to the RF box.

    To program the device, you basically point a remote at the IR window on the RF receiver and on the touchpad, a new button will appear. You tap out out the function name and file it under a device category.

    Now, when you tap the touchpad, it sends a RF singal back to the box which then replays the stored IR signal out through the wire to the appropriate device.

    RF means you can control pretty much everything in your house. You can also get multiple receivers for different A/V equipment. Where I work, the secretary for the high mucky-mucks has the touchpad that controls the equipment in all four of the executive conference rooms. You can even control lights with modules that wire into the receiver.

    Slick slick system, but it costs at least a couple thousand. I'm know this post doesn't really have a whole lot of useful information, but my main point is to avoid consumer products. You are going to get crap. I've seen every consumer remote out there and they are all horrible.

    Search the Internet for A/V dealers that sell high-end equipment for businesses. You will end up paying for it, but you can pretty much get a system that is perfect.

    I'll shut up now and let people post the names of such high-end A/V suppliers, or even the name of the system I just described.

    - JoeShmoe

    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

    --
    -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
    1. Re:Check out High-End A/V dealers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      although expensive, a company called lexicon has been making fabulous, non-MSce controlled learning remotes where you program all the features and touch screens with your computer thru the serial port. it learns any ir command using the existing remote. its beautiful. its $700.

  17. flaimbait or reduntant by cheese63 · · Score: 1

    is it really necessary to have a remote that does all that? i mean, come on.

    1. Re:flaimbait or reduntant by miahrogers · · Score: 1

      yes it is expensive. However the real question, would you use the money you saved on puddin?

      matisse:~$ cat .sig

    2. Re:flaimbait or reduntant by cheese63 · · Score: 1

      touche

  18. Does not control Sony STR-DA90ESG, STR-DE1015G by sinan · · Score: 1

    Above receivers ( and probably more) can not be controlled by this remote....

  19. The problem with all UNI remotes by btx_ · · Score: 1

    If you're like me, you have a DVD and VCR. I happen to have a decent VCR, meaning there is a jog shuttle. I use this to edit, and cannot do without it. There is no universal remote that has a jog shuttle of any kind, making the whole concept of universal remote moot if you have decent video gear, let alone professional. I currently have the Marrantz remote of death (giant LCD, all of the words are changeable, unlike the Sorny universal remote), and it's great, except I can't turn off the LCD backlight (it comes on based on light changes, which means if it's windy, and it's next to the window, it goes on and off constantly) However, my model is 3 years old, and they seem to be on a newer generation of remote.

    1. Re:The problem with all UNI remotes by Jamie+Zawinski · · Score: 2
      If you're like me, you have a DVD and VCR. I happen to have a decent VCR, meaning there is a jog shuttle. I use this to edit, and cannot do without it. There is no universal remote that has a jog shuttle of any kind, making the whole concept of universal remote moot if you have decent video gear, let alone professional.

      It's true, it would be nice if the Pronto was an inch and a half taller and had a programmable jog-shuttle wheel on it. What I did when I laid out the pages for my devices with J/S wheels was add buttons for several speeds:

        • [] [>>] [>>>]

      Then I had it memorize 3 positions in either direction on the wheel (well, 5 positions plus "play".) This works fairly well for normal viewing usage. (Though technically I guess I've only programmed "shuttle", not "jog".)

      However, I can't imagine trying to do video editing with an IR remote at all! Do you actually do that? My VCRs (Panasonic AG-1950s, thirteen years old and still going strong!) have a hardwired edit controller that can control both decks in sync or independently, that has its own J/S wheel, as well as controls for edit-lists.

      IR is nice, but never underestimate the power and flexibility of a 20' cable. I can reach the whole room with it, and I don't have to point it in any particular direction.

  20. No need for us. by Temporal · · Score: 1

    I think you answered your own question. :)
    -------------

  21. TheaterMaster SL-9000 by TazMainiac · · Score: 1

    http://st2.yahoo.net/e-town/theatunrem.html

    Got one. It's awesome. Has 8 different device
    modes, and presets for just about everything.
    And anything it doesn't have presets for, it
    can learn from your old remote. Now, if I can
    only rember what buttons I program where...

  22. The perfect remote already exists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's called the Palm III. You buy this nifty program called OmniRemote to go with it. If you also buy this clip-on IR interface they sell (it clips onto the Palm's HotSync port), then you can use it instead, and it seriously boosts the range of the Palm... (You have to hold the Palm upside-down to use it, but the software it comes with can flip the screen display draw upside down to compensate.)

    ---

    I'm not a real anonymous coward, I just play one on TV.

    1. Re:The perfect remote already exists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could remove the internal 100 ohm resistor so the internal IR has a longer range...

    2. Re:The perfect remote already exists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... which sends the battery lifetime down the drain ....

  23. Use a Palm device by Otterley · · Score: 1

    My suggestion is that you get a Palm III (which can be obtained VERY cheaply--CNet Shopper reports that you can get one for as little as $175 new), and download and register a nifty little program called OmniRemote, which can be located at http://www.pacificneotek.com/omnisw.htm .

    My experience with OmniRemote is wonderful. It really does work well, and it costs a fraction of that of a Take Control remote (buying which, I might add, generously contributes to Microsoft's coffers).

  24. Computer-controlled by ParadoXIII · · Score: 1

    What I want to know is when will we be able to use our computer to do stuff like turn on the stereo? I can't wait to get my house wired... What'll you think of a remote control with a button labeled "House"?

    1. Re:Computer-controlled by delld · · Score: 1

      A few years ago, I walked into Bay-Bloor Radio in Toronto and asked the first sales man if they had any stereo components that had RS232 ports on them. ( This was before USB ). I got the most blank look I have ever seen. Since then I have discovered that some component systems do have some kind comunications port ( Main amp thingy to cd player/tape deck ) on the back ( I^2C maybe??). I always wanted to hack my computer into one, but I have never owned one, and probably never will. Has anyone here played around with the stuff? The other option is of course to buy/make a IR transmitter to hook up to the serial port on the back of the old computer and cheat.

    2. Re:Computer-controlled by Mudhiker · · Score: 1

      dood thats scary! the microsoft remote mentioned elsewhere here has very few buttons, but one of them has a little "house" icon on it!!!

      http://www.microsoft.com/products/hardware/takec ontrol/default.htm

      --
      "I want peace on earth and good will toward men." "We're the U.S. government. We don't do that sort of thing!!"
    3. Re:Computer-controlled by Medieval · · Score: 1

      And what do you think X-10 is? :P

      I have, on my NT server, a two way serial connection to a home automation box.

      Dimmer capabilities, on/off, programming capabilities for the box so that the computer need not even be on to schedule on/offs.
      www.x10.com . and no, i don't work for them, either.

  25. MS remote by MillMan · · Score: 2

    Yes, it indeed does run a sort of windows CE variant...

    But it's still a remote, there isn't any OS per say, it might as well be transparent. It does have a microsoft look/feel, though. Another company sells the same remote, madrigal. (www.madrigal.com) It's called the IRIQ. I think they charge more, however. My friend owns one, he says it's worked pretty well for him. I haven't used it myself though so I can't speak to how good it really is.

    There is another alternative though, if you want to spend 2k or more :) There are a few companies that make remotes that don't use microsoft (well pretty much all of them), and have color LCD touch screens. They are highly customizeable as well, and will run up to 8 devices. I'm speaking of the one made by phast (www.phast.com). I'll let the website describe the rest.

    Basically you pay more money for more customizability. Check out a few issues of Home Theatre magazine, they always have ads for "universal remotes". There are a lot of options.

  26. Palm Pilot + OmniRemote = Your Answer by Zifter · · Score: 1

    If you have a PalmPilot of some sort (I have a IIIe,) get OmniRemote, it is a God-Send. You draw all your own buttons, how you want them, you can even set up multiple "remotes", ie, different screens which you can draw any amount of buttons on you want.

    To program these buttons you simply point your remote at the palms IR port, push the button on the remote, and bam, a button on OmniRemote now does what your remote does.

    And hey, at $20, this is shareware you can afford, and will use for a LONG time!

  27. The Best LCD remote is the Philips Pronto by Rick+Richardson · · Score: 1

    I recently researched the LCD touchscreen
    remotes. The best one is the Philips
    Pronto, also sold as the Marantz RC 5000.
    Extremely cool.

    The Harmon Kardon Take Control, also sold
    as the Madrigal IRIQ is second best.

    The Sony is third, but could be called a Best
    Buy based on its price.

    Goto http://www.remotecentral.com/ for a
    bunch of great information.

    Personally, I like the DIY version: Linux
    running on a palm pilot with a home brew
    application.

  28. Re: Palm Pilot by keytoe · · Score: 3

    You don't even have to do anything to make the Palm Pilot work - there's an application called PalmRemote that'll record any IR input and play it back on demand.

    The cool thing about this is that you can have up to 14 different 'remotes' to choose from - and you get to build them the way you want by simply drawing 'buttons' on the screen. Additionally, you can assign 'macros' to buttons that trigger multiple actions. Sadly, it's not free or open source - but $20 is a far cry from $300 (and it doesn't run wince).

    Ever since I saw this, I've been wanting to head down to Circuit City and learn all of the remotes down there and then... head down to the local sports bar and keep hitting the 'all TVs to the cartoon network' button. Muhahaha. The bonus here is that you'd look like you were working :)

  29. palm=not really, uni-remote=not really, either by diffuson · · Score: 1

    the palm IR is pretty weak intensity-wise. i looked into doing this myself, but if you go to the URL where they sell the software to do this stuff, they also sell an amplifier that attaches to your palm to extend the range. otherwise the bare range of the pilot can be as short as a couple of feet and strongly contingent on your battery level.

    anyhow, i think what the guy was asking about was being able to hit 'play cd'(or whatever) without having to manually configure the system state, ie, switching to the cd input, turning on the cd player, etc. on my tv, i've got three different video input channels and i've got to switch to a particular channel to watch dvd, or the vcr, etc. this initial setup, prior to the 'play' event is what needs to be automated and this is what the current crop of universal remotes doesn't do. they're just lookup tables for common buttons on remotes.

    in theory, you could take the palm remote prog and program the whole sequence of button-down events that would correspond to a given final state.
    now if someone wants to figure out how to jack up the IR intensity of the palm, that would be supercool. i figure another hack would be to solder together a teeny transponder box that sits near you, within range, and just echoes your palm IR but at higher intensity.

    of course, if you were an uber-geek, you would just program a microcontroller yourself to do all the sequential button events, and swap out the circuitry in a uni-remote with your own.



    1. Re:palm=not really, uni-remote=not really, either by Craggles · · Score: 1

      I have a PalmPilot Professional, with the Palm III upgrade, and it has at least 10 feet transmission length. I have the upgrade card gives much better transmission of IR. So if you can get a old palm (pre III), and an upgrade card, you should get good enough IR for a remote.

      Works for me.

  30. Best LCD Touch Remote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go to www.remotecentral.com to find the best. I own a pronto and it kicks butt. The major difference for me was teh Phillips will 'learn' anything while the HK comes with a defined preset # of learned functions. Plus Microsoft made the HK....

  31. Philips Pronto... WONDERFUL! by mindslip · · Score: 1
    The Philips Pronto, and the site Remote Central have been MORE than perfect for me.


    I control:
    an NAD cd-player, a Barco projector, an SSI Dolby Decoder, all three of which are very high end and very esoteric, as well as my Sony/Matsushita/Etc. equipment, all from a very funky front-end which I've put together with: TV-station logos for the channels (no more typing in 2-1-enter-oops-wrong-channel),screens for things like "Theatre", "Music", "Television",and all in a handy, backlit unit with the most powerful IR LED's I've seen.


    Go buy one. Now.

    =-)

    mindslip

  32. A device that can by db48x · · Score: 1

    Yes, there are devices like this that do work. However, there is a device called the HP48GX that is easily programmed, has a large user base, and supports many devices, and can easily learn new ones. The HP48GX can also run a multitude of games and other programs. It can even do trig and calculus.

    Oh, yea... its a calculator... But it works and is very cheap. Only $129.

    Take a look at HP's site

  33. Palmpilot controller by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 1

    There is a neat Palmpilot program called Omniremote. I tested it and was able to control every equipment I wanted using IR. It does have a limited range, but I am able to control my stereo, TV and CD-Player from the other side of my room (~5 meters).

    It has even be considered a security problem for some cars (I guess some Mercedes model) that use a IR code for unlocking the door. So people who had access to your key could copy it much more easily than a conventional key.

    Well, a Palmpilot IIIe can be found for $179. So paying $300 for an All-in-one remote is WAY TOO MUCH .

    Yes, the palmpilot does have a limited range. But I heard of a device that you can attach to it to amplify the IR Beam, thus greatly extending its range. I have no idea of the price, but I belive it will go for about $50. Anyone ?

    --

    -
    Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
    1. Re:Palmpilot controller by Eukaryote · · Score: 1

      The amplifier goes for about 20$US. Eukaryote

    2. Re:Palmpilot controller by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2
      Most IR car openers( read: lazy man's key ) 'jump' codes so once you use that code it's no longer good. You could copy the code and use it once if you're so inclined.

      Leapfrom makes IR to RF attachment that sends the signal to an RF to IR box pointing at your stereo or tv so you can turn down KC and the Sunshine band while in the shitter.

  34. Problem with omni software for pilot by sporty · · Score: 1

    the buttons look small.. if you are like me, you don't look at the remote much when flipping through. Some universal remotes have a switch that change the functionality from one to another (JVC has a cool one -- too bad it works with no audio devices). Something to this effect needs to be done on a wider scale.

    --

    -
    ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

  35. Hmm, my laptop has an IR port... by Scott+Wunsch · · Score: 1

    Can I use that to control my TV? :-)

    --
    \\'
    1. Re:Hmm, my laptop has an IR port... by sec · · Score: 1

      Take a look at the Linux Infrared Remote Control project:


      http://fsinfo.cs.uni-sb.de/~columbus/lirc/index. html

    2. Re:Hmm, my laptop has an IR port... by Fugai · · Score: 1

      This makes me wonder, if indeed the IR ports on notebooks are capable of emulating remote controls for consumer electronics, why hasn't someone written anything for it? if I were any kind of programmer, I would definitely start this project. To me it seems perfectly do-able, and yet no one is doing it... (?)

    3. Re:Hmm, my laptop has an IR port... by BRTB · · Score: 1

      YES, there IS a PC IrDA remote-control program out there... took me a hell of a long time to find... RemoCon-Con. 2.8 still has some Japanese in it but 2.9 (coming soon) should have everything in English.

      Has presets for a bunch of Japanese-built devices (Toshiba, Sony, JVC, Pioneer, etc) but it can learn anything through the IrDA port. And you can program macros. And timers. Only thing I don't like is an annoying sound effect when you press a button... there's probably a way to turn it off but I don't know it yet.

      Register it (it's $25) - it's worth it.

    4. Re:Hmm, my laptop has an IR port... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out www.winremote.com They work on software that let's you use your laptop's IR port for all kinds of Remote Control stuff.

    5. Re:Hmm, my laptop has an IR port... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also a program that seems to be freeware, though I don't know if it does the same things that RemoCon does. winremote.com has some software that interfaces your laptop with infrared remotes. I think this software mainly receives IR to do stuff like control Winamp or PowerPoint.. but they talk about sending infrared commands on the website as well.

  36. Palm IR Port too weak by Fjord · · Score: 4

    I used to run the OmniRemote software by Pacific NeoTek. This tool allows you to record a signal from a device (or a set of signals) and replay them back. So you would point your TV remote at the IR port, hit record on OmniRemote, press "channel up", stop recording and label the "button" you recorded into "Ch+".

    The problem was that the built in IR port was too weak. It couldn't control anything more than 2 feet away. So it was just a cute toy that has no practical value.

    There are hardware add ons that give you a longer range (or an IR port if you don't have one), but I haven't tried them. There is the OmniRemote Module also by NeoTek for $20 (a lot less than the $300 above, even if you have to buy a used Palm), and TaleBeam for $30 (sorry, $29.95). Apparently there is no software for the TaleBeam yet.

    --
    -no broken link
    1. Re:Palm IR Port too weak by Eukaryote · · Score: 1

      I have the amplifier for the IR port for OmniRemote... It works well, but it is only as strong as the original Palm Pilot... the Palm III/V series have weaker infrared beams, and therefore need the amplifier... it will work about 10 feet... I got the code for the TV's in high school... that was always fun... Eukaryote

    2. Re:Palm IR Port too weak by Pascal+Q.+Porcupine · · Score: 2

      That's a neat trick, having an IR beam as strong as the original Pilot, considering the Pilot had no IR port... :) My experience with OmniRemote on my PalmIII's built-in port is that I can control some of my devices from a good 12 feet away, depending on how sensitive the particular device is.
      ---
      "'Is not a quine' is not a quine" is a quine.

      --
      "'Is not a quine' is not a quine" is a quine.
      Quine "quine?
    3. Re:Palm IR Port too weak by The+Mayor · · Score: 1

      With the original Palm Pilot and Palm Pilot Professional, you could get a 2MB upgrade kit. Included in the kit is an IR port. This IR port transmits with about 3x the range as the Palm III. I don't know anything about the strength of the Palm IIIx and IIIe, or the V. However, I suspect the IR port for the origianl Palm Pilot still wins. And, yes, it does exist ;-)

      --
      --Be human.
    4. Re:Palm IR Port too weak by Pascal+Q.+Porcupine · · Score: 2

      Ah, I know about that, but the poster didn't say "Palm upgraded with the PalmIII upgrade card." :) I wasn't aware that the upgrade card's range was better than the real deal's though. Interesting. Regardless, my PalmIII has 10-12 feet of range even when the batteries are as low as 30% (I've never tested it any lower though).
      ---
      "'Is not a quine' is not a quine" is a quine.

      --
      "'Is not a quine' is not a quine" is a quine.
      Quine "quine?
  37. The HK remote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw these demonstrated at CES 99 (Consumer Electronics Show). These are as far as remotes go, very solid, well built, feature laden remotes.

    At risk of starting an off topic post-wave, something worth noting is that these remotes have software by Microsoft in them; at CES this was touted as a HK/MS joint project.

    If this product interests you, there is also a product made by Marantz, the RC5000, that is comparable. The Marantz product is also marketed by their parent company, Philips, as the Pronto. The Pronto is smaller and lighter but feels less well built than the Take Control.

    If this product is too expensive / overkill for you, Sony has an AV2000 remote that has a large touch LCD panel on it. It is not as programmable as the other two, however, $100-150 is not too bad for something like this.

    Of course if this all doesn't amuse you, you can always invest about $10k into an AMX 10.4" active matrix LCD touchpanel/Axcent system. My work sent me to a training seminar for the AMX systems, these things are sweeet, they have 6 RS-232 ports, and the ability to control almost anything in your house or business. If AMX doesn't have support for your device directly, you can add it easily.

    Things you may want to see:
    http://www.amx.com - Very cool touchpanel system
    http://www.phast.com - AMX's more home oriented division.
    http://www.marantz.com - RC5000
    http://www.pronto.philips.com - Pronto remote

    Sorry if I get a bit long winded about this stuff, it's the field I work in.
    -Dan5184

  38. Moderate this guy up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  39. Sony Remote by geek_77 · · Score: 1

    I can only comment on what I use on a regular basis, the Sony Remote Commander RM-V2000 (even the name is cool). This remote kicks some serious ass. It has 12 different modes (tv,vcr1,vcr2,vcr3,dvd,dbs/cable,amp,cd,md/dat/dec k b/a,tuner,option) and a huge backlit, touch-sensative LCD display. All of the buttons are programmable and the remote can "learn" your existing remotes if they are not pre-programmed. The remote also features 3 macro buttons that let you set a number of commands (like turn the tv on, turn to video 1 mode, turn the amp on and put it in DVD mode, and then turn the dvd player on and press the play button) that can then be accessed at the touch of a button. It can also learn other IR products, like lights and window shades (if you've got IR controlled window shades, you have a bigger problem than finding an all-in-one remote). I believe this is the same remote people posted about earlier. I got it at a sony dealer here in town for $125, definitely worth the money. Sorry, I don't have a URL to sony's page, I'm too lazy. hope that helps. laters.

    geek77

    --
    If what you say is true..... then I still don't care.
  40. Philips Pronto by JohnDonagher · · Score: 1

    I bought a Philips Pronto, a similar product, just last night. This is one of the coolest products Philips has ever released. I decided to buy the Pronto over the Harmon Kardon for a few reasons. First, the Harmon Kardon was co-developed with Microsoft. I don't trust a software company who can't make software with making consumer electronics. That's just me tho'. Second, the screen is not as big. Third, it has NO WHERE NEAR the expandability that the Pronto has. --!Switching to Plug mode!-- The Pronto has a meg of flash and is completely programmable. You can learn commands sent at frequencies of up to 56KHz, so that will cover most consumer-grade remotes. I have completely programmed my Pronto to control my TV (Picture-in-Picture as well), my DVD player, my Amp, and my 50CD jukebox. The touch screen is more than responsive enough for my needs. You can download pre-programmed configuration files for common components of your home audio/video system on to your PC, and then download those files over a serial port to the Pronto. Firmware upgrades are also available through the PC software. The list price on the Pronto is $399 but I got mine for $275. I can't say where, but you can get them from J&R for I believe $300. If you want the rechargable pack, you need to pay another $80, so I skipped on that and am using Double A's (4 of them). I've been told one set of batteries will get you about 6 months of normal usage. Phillips has certainly outdone themselves on this one. I'm really happy with mine. Some sites you may want to check out if interested: Remote Central - reviews of both the Harmon Kardon, Pronto, and another similar Sony product, features&specs lists, cool stuff Remote Central Review of the Pronto - nice review, nice pictures Philips Pronto site - nice pictures of the unit Pronto Edit - this is the free software you can use to download to/update the Pronto Pretty sweet unit, I highly reccomend it.

    1. Re:Philips Pronto by Jamie+Zawinski · · Score: 2
      I also have a Pronto, and it is without a doubt the best remote control I have ever seen in my life. I've had it for about six months (and it's still on the first set of batteries!)

      The Pronto Edit software is very easy to use; I generally do all my programming of it with the computer instead of by hand on the remote.

      I only wish I could figure out how to make VMware talk to my serial port, so that I wouldn't have to boot Windows to do this, sigh...

      One of the interesting things you will discover the first time you try to use a touchscreen as a remote control is that it's slightly harder to operate in the dark: because you have to actually turn your head and look at the (backlit) screen to find the buttons, you can't just feel around for them. But that's another of the benefits of the Pronto over something more Pilot-like: it has seven physical buttons that are also per-page programmable (laid out for Mute, Ch +/-, Vol +/-, Left and Right) so I tend to use those for the most frequent actions, and don't actually have to look at it much except when changing pages.

  41. Applicable link by Keelor · · Score: 2
    Well, I couldn't find the article I was thinking of, but The-Gadgeteer seems to have a whole gamut of links to reviews and useful sites. Hope it helps.

    ~=Keelor

  42. X-10 Remote by MustardMan · · Score: 1

    X-10 has a really cool remote that I have found to work quite well. It's called the Learning Super-Remote. There are two versions, make sure you get the learning one. This baby has three communication methods built in, IR send like any remote, IR recieve so you can point the original remote at it and program functions, and a radio transmitter so you can control your X-10 Firecracker modules with it. I have my whole apartment wired, so not only is my whole entertainment system controlled by my remote, my lights and popcorn maker are too. Isn't technology grand?


    Tell a man that there are 400 Billion stars and he'll believe you

    1. Re:X-10 Remote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I own one of the X-10 learning remotes, and it doesn't seem to want to learn the codes for my new Sony equipment. Caveat emptor.

  43. AMX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The AMX is definately the way to go if money is no object, they have a wireless controller with a 6" color LCD touch screen that uses a 2 way 2.4 Ghz connection to the base unit. The docking station is also a recharger, they even have a version that has NTSC video input and the controls are overlaid on top of the video. The AMX system can control almost anything. Im completely fascinated by these things, but not enough to spend my life savings on one...

  44. Marantz Learning Remote by Eukaryote · · Score: 1

    My parents at home have a home theatre setup that is powered by a Marantz Learning Remote... I believe it runs about 300$US, and it is completely programmable, inculding a 4 screen menu for each different function (TV, CD, LD, DVD, SAT, etc.) and each of these can be programmed, along with the real buttons at the bottom. Eukaryote

    1. Re:Marantz Learning Remote by Haight6716 · · Score: 1

      I got one of these for under $100 at a high-end stereo store in NYC - on sale.

      I much preferred my old, pioneer learning remote, because the pioneer was "modeless" and had a ton of buttons. The marintz makes you switch back and forth between pages and squint at the LCD.

      Why do the good, simple things always go away? -=Julian=-

  45. I need buttons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I would never buy a
    touchscreen remote. I surf by feel.

    The best CHEAP remote is the One4All
    Cinima-7, less than $20 at WallMart.

    Basically, if it supports your device,
    it supports ALL features of that device,
    although you may have to search for the
    feature code and assign it to a key.

    It's more flexible than the box or the
    manual advertises (features they advertise
    on their higher priced remotes). Search
    dejanews for details.

    1. Re:I need buttons. by brix · · Score: 1

      I was actually a little worried about how easy it would be to surf with an LCD remote as well. This almost scared me away from the Pronto/RC-5000 (I already had an RC-2000, but ran out of memory). Fortunately, the 7 physical buttons on the RC-5000 work perfectly for surfing, and the ability to jump to an entirely different "page" of commands means that I can even "chain" keys to expand that number even more. For example, I have one of the physical buttons in my "Surf" mode set up to take me into VCR mode. At that point the physical buttons now control the most commonly used features of the VCR. The customizability of the Pronto/RC-5000 is an absolute joy for this and many other reasons.

      If someone were really, really tied to physical buttons, the best high-end is probably the Marantz RC-2000 Mark II. Between $200 and $250, it has 32 soft-keys for each device (in addition to all the "standard" buttons). The soft-keys are labeled on the LCD, but are actual physical buttons placed next to the user-defined label.

      While I ran out of memory on my RC-2000, that was the first generation (well, first point-release of the first generation from what I understand). I believe that the Mark II's make considerably better usage of memory.

      - Doug

  46. Phillips Pronto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's about the same price, but it is incredible. It is MUCH more flexible then the HK and 100% microsoft free. There is a Windows (uggh) program that allows you to change the layout and functionality of this remote. Basically, it's the ONLY remote to have. I believe Marantz sells the same remote (with a MUCH cooler coler). It is pricey, but worth every penny.

  47. Why not an HP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could use an HP48GX (49?) With the remote control program... you sample the IR signals you want to program on it and voila! as many devices as you want and much more affordable than 300....

    1. Re:Why not an HP? by dysprosium · · Score: 1

      You could absolutely use an HP48G/GX (or even an S/SX...though I haven't tried). I've used my G to control my TV, my stereo, other people's TV's, etc. There is a remote control program available (try hpcalc.org) that has pre-programmed files for hundreds of different devices from different manufacturers, and it even includes a utility to learn codes from the original remote in case your device isn't supported.

      btw, you can NOT use the HP49, as it has no IR port. :(

  48. I /THINK/ you're talking about the new AMX systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a look here for the skinny. Make sure you get one of the ones with IR capability. This is almost certainly overkill for any home application, though. But it DOES do ANYTHING.

  49. What abouth the IR PORT ON MY LAPTOP? by freedomfighter · · Score: 1

    Seriously, is there anything preventing my laptop, which communicates with other computers through an IR port, from comminicating with my TV, stereo, etc? Why hasn't the computer industry made this mainstream already? Don't you think most people would want to be able to control most of their home electronics from their computer? Think about all the possibilities. A simple program could control your TV, CD player/stereo, have timers set up for them ... so many possibilities, and with current voice recognition software, you could do it all without pushing a button, oh and of course ... you would NEVER have to worry about losing your remote again (when was the last time you missplaced your computer???) But the question remains ... can this be done and if so, why has it not been done already??

    1. Re:What abouth the IR PORT ON MY LAPTOP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The port on your laptop uses the IrDA protocol. This protocol is implemented on a separate chip and does all sorts of things to the data that your home entertainment equipment probably will not deal with. Basically, it's like a little infrared modem that modulates and demodulates the data. That being said, I think it becomes obvious that it would be very difficult, if not impossible, to talk that little thing into sending arbitrary transmissions. As far as something that _does_ work, my inclination would be to kludge an IR diode onto one of the control lines of my serial port (assuming you have real ports on your laptop) and write a little program to send the correct data. An IR detector could even be rigged up and the program expanded to "learn" from your old remotes. No, I'm not planning on doing this because, strangely, I do not presently own anything for which I use the remote.

    2. Re:What abouth the IR PORT ON MY LAPTOP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, and there are a couple of groups that are doing just that!
      Check out:
      winremote.com
      The Linux infrared remote control project
      RemoCon

  50. Ever hear of the IR link? by zavyman · · Score: 1

    If you own a TI graphing calc, there is a handy add-on called the ir-link that makes it relatively easy to record and send IR signals.

    All it would take would be someone to program (in assembly, of course) a nice little app that would record and save the signals for each category of equipment. A simplified version of this already exists, and it would need only a bit of tweaking to make a nice GUI, etc.

    The only downside is that you have to build the link yourself, and own a TI calc...

  51. Check out the OneForAll by cmeans · · Score: 1

    We have JVC CD, JVC Dual Cassette Tape Deck, JVC Stereo Receiver, Two JVC VCRs, Hughts DirecTV DSS, and a Sharp TV.

    Our one remote (www.oneforall.com) is handling just about everything we need. I never need to use anything else, though my wife does a lot of recording with the tape decks, and there are some features we haven't programmed.

    It basically handles AMP, TUN, TV, CBL, CD, VCR, SAL, AUX1, & Home Theater. Those are dedicated buttons, the rest handle the various features.

    I highly recommend it. We use a standard IR version, but there's also a radio version.

    The one we have, model URC-8080B00 is top notch. It cost about $90 USD at Best Buy, about 2 years ago. It's been dropped, slammed, sat on, you name it (we have a 4.5 year old boy ).

    Just about all the buttons are reprogramable, and you can program "macros", though I didn't see the point...I don't mind pressing a few buttons in the right sequence.

    I can't recommend this product enough.

  52. woo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I don't really think this is all that important an issue. In fact, I'm more concerned with the picture quality and audio quality of a system than with the remote control.

    Also, I reccommend a course in set theory.

    Also, if you really wanted to, you could probably whip something up in hypercard and run it on a mac plus emulator or something...

  53. The one I *want* doesn't exist,but two runners-up: by rbrander · · Score: 1
    My specs for the remote I want include:

    1. Programmability - pre-programming is NEVER enough;
    2. Macros - true convenience is turning everything on/off with one button;
    3. Ergonomic design, with key shapes and arrangements your hand can find its way around without looking. Astonishing how many are just a grid of identical buttons...)
    4. Under $100
    It doesn't exist. The $300 items violate the last spec and also the ergonomics since you can't feel them at all. (At least the one I'm aware of is just a touch display with virtual buttons".)

    The odd thing is that I'm sure it could exist since there are two runners-up that come close, for under $30 US. Both are great ergonomically and for price, and each does ONE of the other two specs.

    One For All 6 Universal Remote
    (Universal Electronics, Inc. $15-$20US) With "Powered by Motorola" logo, incidentally.

    A universal, but a good one as these go - and it has a tedious key-sequence for creating macro keys of codes it already knows. The manual offers the ability to have keys custom-programmed, if you don't mind sending them back to the factory and paying an amount they wouldn't discuss by E-mail. The E-mail exchange left me cold and I dropped the matter. The Macro feature is great, but since it's a Universal, you of course are always missing a feature you use often enough - like making my VCR pop up the screen display so I can see what time-point the tape is at.

    Radio Shack 7 in 1 Universal Remote Control
    (15-1924 in the RS catalog, $40-$50 US)

    This one is programmable, but it doesn't do macros...argh. And the previous remote had spoiled me for them.
    Also, there's a funny limitation to the programming. If you're programming the keys when they're prefixed by, say, VCR being the current device, you often can't put in a TV or Receiver code. Sometimes, but not always. It just gives you the three-flash "error" signal when you send in the signal from the other remote. So you can rarely mix devices. Since my receiver is always the volume control device no matter what I'm getting the signal from (tape, laserdisc, airwaves), it means you're constantly jumping back and forth between devices.

    I judge remotes by whether my wife, who hates them all, can use it..and the device-jumping was a showstopper for her.

    It seems to me that the chip running the thing just needs to be a *little* more featureful - and they've got to include macros. And a few more buttons to program.

    I'm sure they can do that much for under twice the price of the Radio Shack. It dumbfounds me that the hotly competitive consumer electronics industry hasn't already done this. What are they thinking?

  54. Oh boy... by jfunk · · Score: 4

    I have the same woes.

    It appears to be impossible to find a good remote.

    Check this site for a ton of info. Beware, big companies give this guy free remotes so don't expect a hell of a lot of journalistic integry anywhere but the user forums.

    For cheap and good, the SL-9000 does look quite nice. I've never tried it though. It has decent punch-through and macro options (most important).

    For high-end, the Philips one looks pretty good but I don't really like those screens because you actually have to look at it to get to a button. I can hit most of the buttons on my five separate remotes (works for now, I'm afraid of the lost functionality of multi-remotes). There is also the fact that you can't fit a hell of a lot of buttons on those screens, you'll probably find yourself scrolling a lot.

    If you like those screens and want something kind of cheap, there is software you can get for a palm but the IR port isn't all that high-powered. I heard somewhere (can't remember where) that there will be a remote control addition to the Visor.

    My advice: a number of high-end home theatre stores will let you bring a remote home to try it out. Do this and don't buy anything fancy unless you need the functionality.

    I have also thought about designing my own remote. Simply use a PIC, a 2-wire EEPROM, a serial port, and a load of buttons and you can program your remote graphically on your PC. A lot of low-level remote info can be found through the LIRC (Linux Infrared Remote Control) project. This way you can get a remote that does pretty much anything you want and you won't have to worry about setting punch-throughs, macros, switching between components, etc. The software would allow you to print a sheet which you can cut up and place under a clear plastic cover on your remote that has the key names on it. Some remotes have little stickers that you can place under the buttons so that would be an option (although not so elegant) as well.

    Yes, I'm very serious about designing my own remote. I have done much thought on it. I want it to be as good or better quality than commercial remotes. If anyone is interested in helping out/discussing it email me and we'll maybe set up a mailing list and web page, etc.

    1. Re:Oh boy... by Dj · · Score: 1

      Er... the Philips is actually wonderful. There's
      7 hard buttons on there for "the things you press without looking" (ch+/-,vol +/-, l/r, mute). Everything else *you* can layout. So want a "everything switched over for watching sattelite whilst recording off another channel while..." you can create it. And you can get access to direct codes that let you override tv power toggles or input selectors. Currently, for the money, there isn't a better more functional remote. Forget the palm pilot ideas, forget the Sony master remote (low configurability) forget the one 4 alls (consumerish junk at the end of the day). The Philips Pronto is *the* remote. Oh, and really forget the "Take Control"; it's an epoch making step back in technology.

      --
      "You know you want me baby!" - Crow T Robot
    2. Re:Oh boy... by RossH · · Score: 1

      Aside from a computer controlled remote system, there is a swell big buck option. Go to crestron.com or panja.com and dig on the rs232/432 to IR controllers. One can go so far as to physically attach an IR probe to each device and control it (one way) thru 232 commands sent by a fancy box. Big control systems can read info from room and processor temp to network traffic and the latest controllers are being built with IP address' for an even more infinite range of control sources. If you are like me however, to build something cool would carry a $20k tag. If you really want to hate this megebuck type of rig - think about every ms board, confrence, training, breifing, and exec room well outfitted with same gear.

    3. Re:Oh boy... by Rob+Parkhill · · Score: 1

      This problem falls into two areas: do-it-all remotes that are shiny, easy-to-use, and cost a lot of money, and do-it-all remotes that are a bit clunky, are not very shiny, and don't cost much.

      There is lot's to look at in the former category. I'll skip this.

      There is not much to look at in the later category, but there is at least one. Head to Radio Shack. Yes, Radio Shack. Once there, ask for their top of the line programmable IR remote. It costs about $50 CDN, so I'm guessing about $30 US.

      It does just about everything that every other remote can do with just a set of buttons. It doesn't have a jog-shuttle, so don't expect that, and it's only IR, so it won't control your RF devices. But other than that, it does it all. And if it doesn't have the functionality built in, it can learn the codes from your othe devices. It even does macros, so you can hit one button to turn everything on, or just a few things, etc.

      The instruction book is about the size of a cheap paperback novel, and there is a 1-800 number you can call to get info on the more advanced features that they couldn't cram into the book.

      The down-side is that the design of this remote is just about as bad as any Sony remote you've ever used. It's just a matrix of identical buttons.

      That said, I don't own one anymore. I had it for a few says, but the design of it just sucks. It's really hard to memorize the location of all 50+ buttons on this thing, and they are all identical, so there are no shape cues. Plus it won't control my X10 devices, so I had to keep 2 remotes out anyhow.

      It's worth checking out.


      --
      "Tomorrow's forecast: a few sprinkles of genius with a chance of doom!" - Stewie Griffin
  55. Pronto is better than Take Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I used to own a Take Control. I sold it shortly after buying the Pronto. The Pronto is a superior product for many reasons:
    • The IR output is stronger on the Pronto. It operates my equipment no matter where I point the Pronto. I needed to point the Take Control directly at the equipment.
    • The Pronto desktop software (ProntoEdit) is easier to use than the Take Control software. I programmed the Pronto in a fraction of the time it took to do the same tasks with the Take Control.
    • ProntoEdit comes with an emulator for the device. No need to wait for the download to try things out.
    • ProntoEdit supports import from other configuration files. The Take Control does not. Import is a huge feature. There's a large body of configurations availabe at Remote Central.
    • The Pronto is more configurable. You can use your own bitmaps, assign macros to any button, and so on. Take a look at these configuration files to see what people are doing with the thing.
    • The wheel button on the Take Control is annoying to use. The conventional hard buttons on the Pronto work better.
    • There are more hard buttons on the Pronto.
    • The contrast on the Pronto screen is higher.
    • The batteries last longer on the Pronto.
    I could go on. I love the Pronto. I think that the Take Control is a piece of sh*t compared to the Pronto.

    I know one of the developers from MS who worked on the Take Control. He tells me that it does not use WinCE.

  56. a real universal remote must have x10 features by sesquiped · · Score: 1

    A remote control cannot be called "universal" unless it can control every single electronic device in your house. The most popular and easiest way to do this is with X10, the home automation standard. You probably already know what X10 is and what it can do, so I'd just like to point out a remote that can control tv's, vcr's, etc, and it can also send out X10 commands:

    http://www.x10.com/products/x10_ur47a.htm

    I think there are a few similar models on that site. Look around. But remember, it's gotta have X10 or it's not really universal.

  57. Remote by Kanasta · · Score: 1

    Doesn't some Palms have programmable infrared thingies. Remember that fuss about copying keyless car entry things a while back. You could probably use that to copy all your current remotes.

  58. A Clumsy Solution by redmist · · Score: 1

    One thing that you could do that would probably be a pretty bad idea but fun nevertheless would be to take a lot of PC-7 (non-critical 50-50 mixture epoxy), and glue all the remotes that you have to your arm...it would be like a mini home-entertainment center control headquarters.

    .{redmist}.
    -------------------------------------------------

    --

    .{redmist}.
    -------------------------------------------------

  59. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  60. Those be cool. by antizeus · · Score: 1
    Unlike many of my fellow highly paid Silicon Valley residents, I don't spend a lot of money on cool gadgets. I still have a TV from 1984, and I play music through a boom box that's hooked up to a pair of speakers I found by the dumpster. I only have one remote, and that came with my cheapo VCR. I usually walk across the room to do stuff. It's not like I couldn't use the exercise.

    That said, a bunch of my friends got some remotes that you program by beaming ordinary remote signals into, and they are hella cool. I think they paid something like $20 for them several years ago, but that was because they got a discount from a friend who worked at a place that sold them. The moral of the story is that you can (or at least could) get truly programmable remotes for a reasonable price.

    --
    -- $SIGNATURE
  61. Marantz RC-18SR by ats1911 · · Score: 1

    My Marantz receiver came with a universal remote that I'm quite impressed with. It comes, of course, with Marantz codes pre-programmed, and since they're owned by Philips all of the PhilipsMagnavox codes are ready to go, too.

    It cannot interface with a PC, but it can clone itself to another RC-18SR or RC-2000. Don't know about the RC-5000.

    They're quite pricy by themselves, $250-300. Worth it? The rest of the family can operate this pretty well, which is actually an improvement over the collection of remotes that preceded it. Nice backlit buttons and LCD display (which isn't touch-sensitive -- it uses all real buttons). I doubt I would have bought one myself, but now that I've used it I would recommend it if you can afford it.

  62. IR Remote for serial port? by chandoni · · Score: 1
    Can anybody recommend a cheap device that can send and receive IR signals, that I can hook up to a serial port, and that has linux drivers? With appropriate software, this could turn into a programmable remote with pretty much unlimited capacity.

    I've seen plans on the net for circuits you can build, but I'd rather pay about $10-20 for a prebuilt one.

    JMC

  63. Casio by Vignettian · · Score: 1

    I have a casio replacement remote that I picked up at circuit city (of all places).. the cool thing about this one is that it "learns" ANY button by reading the signal from the existing remote.

    Just put the casio in "read" mode, point the remote at a sensor on the casio, and press the button. boom. no codes, dip switches, etc. blah!

    It also had a selector switch for up to five different devices.. it got a little confusing, because it had a bank of twelve unmarked buttons in a grid. total of 40 buttons x 5 settings = 200 different remote buttons can be programmed.

    I picked this thing up about two years ago but recently packed it away. Wish I had the model number. Hrmm.. I remember seeing a gemini brand remote that did the same thing as mine, but was slimmer looking.

  64. Nerd it up by gad_zuki! · · Score: 3
    Practical? Economical? Bah, I scoff at your IR needs.

    What you need is a PalmPilot + the Omniremote software. They even sell a hardware add on if you don't have IR.

    Goto http://www.pacificneotek.com/

    BTW, this is the gear the guys at the HackFurby project use - http://www.homestead.com/hackfurby/

    And when you perfect your IR floodlamp remote please don't distrub my daily viewings of Manimal and Joni Loves Chachi.

  65. Or, build it yourself.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.hut.fi/Misc/Electronics/ Look under the IR section. There's one where you can use your PC to send IR signals through the serial port, and a couple universal remotes that you can build yourslef.

  66. Sure... by Greyfox · · Score: 2

    You can get a serial IR emitter/reciever for your PC. Plugs right into the serial port, doesn't need batteries. Then just have your system watch for codes coming down the serial port and act appropriately (So you could instruct the computer to manipulate X10 devices via a remote.)

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  67. Omniremote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Omniremote does most things well. Once you put an IR expander on the end, it has everything you might need except for mushy buttons.

  68. I believe so by Greyfox · · Score: 2

    It should just be a matter of figuring out what data is coming in on the IR port and spitting it back out again. You could also do this with a PC and one of those IR emitters you can get down at CompUSA for $30. It would be kind of cool to sit down at the PC and drive your whole audio/video entertainment center.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  69. PalmOS Remotes... by William+Tanksley · · Score: 2

    Yes, that's a good solution. The problem is that the normal Palm IR is pretty weak. Read the user testimonials to see the range.

    You either have to get an IR extender (fairly cheap and useful) or instead of buying a Palm, buy a Visor. User reports indicate that they have punch-through-the-walls power IR. I have no idea why they'd do that -- but that's WAY cool. Nobody's yet reported a maximum range for remote control (but there are very few people who have Visors yet); the people who have tried gave up after getting out of sight of their devices.

    I can think of a use, though. Imagine an entire classroom set up as a distributed network -- during a test.

    -Billy

    1. Re:PalmOS Remotes... by AndyL · · Score: 1

      I got prety decent range with my PalmIII at least 10ft. (Didn't try any longer.(And this was with nearly full bateries.) But my main problem was that I had to use the stylus to tap at my new remote. Sure you can use your fingers but who wants finger-prints all over the screen?

    2. Re:PalmOS Remotes... by Joikm · · Score: 1
      IR is just outside of visible freqs, so it shouldn't be able to go through much that light can't go through.

      Unless it's powerful enough to bounce around the wall. I know that a normal IR remote will bounce off of two walls before dying....

    3. Re:PalmOS Remotes... by Q*bert · · Score: 1
      One of my Palm-toting friends uses this solution: He cuts a rectangle of Saran Wrap with the dimensions of the screen and sticks it on with static electricity. (Actually, he does it to protect the screen from stylus scratches, but it works equally well for what you want.)

      You could keep such a "Palm condom" around and apply it whenever you use it as a remote.

      Cheers,

      Vovida, OS VoIP
      Beer recipe: free! #Source
      Cold pints: $2 #Product

  70. All in one remote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    For the past 6 months I have been using a truly universal remote control from harmon/kardon (I think that's how you spell it.) It is capable of reaching my tv/vcr/dvd/ld/digital tuner/thx decoder from over 30 ft. It uses a roller, and four physical buttons for common things like volume up and down, channel up and down and mute. It has a customizable touch screen lcd that is 4x6 buttons in size and is completely customizable and can be cofigured with several pages worth of buttons. The controls that it doesn't have in its database can be programmed into it as it has an IR port for input and a second more powerful one to transmit. There are only 2 problems that I have with it. It cost $300 and it runs WinCE, but other than that it has worked great.

    If you want some more info contact me at kevin_brown@uswest.net

  71. Cloud 9 by hisholiness · · Score: 1

    The Woz made the ultimate IR remote a few years back, called the "Cloud 9", it could learn any other remote and was fully programmable. Of course, it was 65C02 based.

    A rare find indeed, the market was not ready for that much remote.

  72. Check Best Buy... by tobyl · · Score: 1

    They've got the One for All remotes, which (at least in the 7-device kind that I bought) control a very wide range of devices. The kicker is that it has 4 "learn" buttons that, for each device can be set to anything that device's remote can send out. That should cover all the main functions of any specialty remote. Hell - it's even got PIP and VCR controls built in. At $29.95, it beats the PalmPilot and HP-48 options in price.

  73. http://www.remotecontrol.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this guys site gives reviews, etc. for all these remotes everyone's been talking about... cya! ben (grymm)

  74. If you really want to get rid of all of those... by AsbestosRush · · Score: 1

    Panja (formerly AMX) or Crestron is the way to go. Both offer a wide variety of wired and wireless remotes (both IR and RF flavors) that communicate to a proprietary CPU that sends outs commands via IR or rs232/422. They're really cool, and work well, but the cost is a little prohibitive to most of us who live off of an IT staffmembers salary. Both units are completly programmable using (again) a proprietary language that is unique to the system (AMX looks a lot like C, I belive Crestron is more working with modules than code) but allows very robust control of whatever you are using.

    --
    EveryDNS. Use it. It works.
    AC's need not reply
  75. IR remotes and Linux by duras · · Score: 1

    Funny someone should bring up IR remotes and controlling your Linux box with an X10 system. Just last week I built an IR reciever with 5 dollars worth of Rat Shack components and use it with the lircd daemon. It runs great. I can control my mp3s from my remote, use it as an IR mouse, I have a button that speaks the time, I wrote some alarm clock software, and the remote has my sleep button (and configurable delay.) The most ironic part of it, of course, is that I'm using an X10 8in1 remote. One of the buttons on this remote tells my Firecracker to turn on and off my lights. Its a trippy circle.

  76. Laptop as Remote Control? by sec · · Score: 1


    http://fsinfo.cs.uni-sb.de/~columbus/lirc/index. html

    Since some people are asking about using their laptop's IrDA port to control consumer electronic devices, I'll point them to LIRC, the Linux Infrared Remote Control project. More information can be found at the above site.

    Things I'd be concerned about, though:

    - What exactly is the range of the IrDA port?

    - Where is the IrDA port physically located?

    Another possibility is the serial port gizmo that the site describes. I can see definite advantages with it:

    - It's currently supported.

    - It would likely be mounted on the back of the computer. This way, if you're sitting watching TV with your laptop in your lap, the IR LED will be pointed at the TV, instead of off to the side or at your stomach. Even if your laptop's serial port is in some wierd location, you can modify the device's design to make the LED point in the right direction.

    - It can be used with laptops with no IrDA ports, or even desktops.

  77. SL-9000 Home Theater Master by speedenator · · Score: 1

    I got this beastie... the SL-9000 Home Theater Master. Runs about $100. Also comes with the recent B&K receivers / pre-amps. It's fully programmable, and has a TON of presets for various components (have that weird-ass Nakamichi tape drive? It's there). It's also button-oriented, vs touch-pad, which I prefer. Only drawback is that it shared the arrow functions with the play / ff / rv / stop, which is annoying for the DVD as you then program some of the other keys for that.

    I forget the URL, but it's pretty easy to find with reasonable search engines like MetaCrawler (www.metacrawler.com).

    -e

  78. A Great Remote Without Too High a Cost by wracz · · Score: 1

    I bought a really nice remote for about $130 US. The Home Theater Master SL-9000. It has an LCD display, and will control anything on IR. It has codes for just about every stereo console unit, and if it doesn't you can program it in. It actually provided more functionality for some devices than the remote they came with! It has illumination for all the buttons and LCD too. 4 AAA batteries incl. If you get/build a universal reciever then you're all set for your computer too. Same company also has a touch screen remote coming out soon.

    Check it out at www.hometheatermaster.com

  79. Cheaper Alternatives by snaga · · Score: 1

    Well I dont know about you but i have been using an interesting device fora couple of years now. Your local AV store should have one:

    It has a fairly standard set of buttons (on/off/play/no. pad/ff/rw etc) but you have to programme each button. This is done by hitting a learn buttin holding down the button you wish to programme and pressing the button on the original remote, with the two remotes touching.

    It has a selector switch, and in each position of the said selector switch the buttons do whatever they are programmed to do in that mode.

    Mine Cost me $US 30 ($AU 55).....

  80. Marantz RC-2000 by Damien+Neil · · Score: 1
    My personal favorite of the uber-remotes is the Marantz RC-2000MkII Mine currently controls a receiver, TV, DVD player, LD player, DSS decoder, and VCR, and has plenty of room left over. Since buying it, I haven't touched any of the other remotes except to program functions into it. It lists for $250.

    I have heard good things about the Phillips Pronto/Marantz RC-5000. This remote uses a touchscreen instead of physical buttons, and offers a very high degree of customizability. (Regrettably, only through Windows, as far as I know.) I have never used one myself, and suspect I would not like it; I prefer to have physical buttons.

    You can get remote control software for the Pilot. (An impressive achievement, since speaking remote protocols through a UART is decidedly non-trivial; I'd love to know how they did it.) The Pilot's IR range is very low, however, and I find the interface to be very clunky. I don't belive you'll ever be able to match the convenience of a single-purpose remote with a Pilot.

    Whatever you go with, definitely try before you buy. Tastes vary wildly when it comes to remotes.

  81. Home Automation by HeatherMax · · Score: 1

    There are lots of 'do it all' remotes out there. Sure, a Palm, a wince device or even a laptop can do this, but there are lots of remotes that you can point a remote at and they'll record what it says and assign it to button X as well. The problem with those is usually thnt to assign is not something you want to click once, or something like that.

    The flash stuff in this market is really in the 'home automation' crowd. Check out SmartHome for some really good stuff, and at least an intro to the area.

    There are some really neat devices out there which are remote controllable, using RF rather than IR (which means it works through walls, couches and so forth) and which output IR to your favourite devices. Snazzy!

    Of course, once you start reading about this stuff a remote isn't enough - you want to be just chatting away to your house and having it tell you when the _important_ email arrives... :-)

    Regards,

    --
    Andrew.
  82. Remote needs phone too by maroberts · · Score: 1

    I'm still waiting for a remote which also acts as a mobile or semi-mobile phone for the ultimate in couch potato toys.

    If it can read email and web pages too it'd make Star Trek tricorders look old fashioned :-)

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

    1. Re:Remote needs phone too by brix · · Score: 1
      Well, I guess you could always buy a Qualcomm pdQ and add the OmniRemote software that others have been talking about here. Since the pdQ is a cell phone with a complete Palm OS 3.0 and IR, I don't see why it wouldn't work. Since it can read e-mail and web pages wirelessly, I think you might just have your tricorder-killer ;-)

      On the downside, I ended up returning my pdQ. For the $800 cost of the pdQ I can get ...
      • a Palm Vx with 8 megs of RAM (the pdQ only had 2)
      • another cell phone (actually I already had one, so this was just additional cost savings to me)
      • the data cables for the cell phone
      The result is smaller (a normal cell phone+Palm V combo is smaller than the pdQ alone), has better battery life by a huge factor, and overall is much more convenient than the pdQ.

      I too am always looking for the ultimate in couch-potato toys, but this just wasn't it for me. As much as I was looking forward to convergence, now that it's here I find that the alternative is better after all.

      - Doug
  83. Anyone remember... by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

    the Apple MessagePad? I recall seeing a nice little app for it called Showmate that would let you control all of your favourite entertainment appliances. The drawback is the Newton's IR signal was weak so you needed to be within ten feet of the device and it only worked with five brands of electronics.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  84. Yes, but you still have to find it... by The+Big+D · · Score: 1
    This press release found on the onion talks about a new remote control that can be used to operate your other remote controls. Take a look!

    ---------
    To hell with you, I never liked you, you are no friend of mine...

  85. RedRat: turn your pc into infrared remote control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    check out this: turn your pc into infrared remote control http://www.dodgies.demon.co.uk

  86. in a wacht by zmooc · · Score: 1

    I once had a casio watch that could learn IR-codes from other remotes. It worked perfectly. Real fun when you're watching video at your school :) Anyhow. The thing costed dfl 120...I think that's about $60. And that for a watch, so I think the $300 you're talking about is a bit expensive. You can still buy those watches btw. They have a huge set of preprogrammed codes which are really if you're in a tv-shop:)

    --
    0x or or snor perron?!
    1. Re:in a wacht by zmooc · · Score: 1

      *laughing about the subject*

      --
      0x or or snor perron?!
  87. I have something similar by radish · · Score: 1

    I don't know much about the HK product you mention, but I have a universal remote (mine is branded Cambridge Audio Multimedia Explorer but I have seen the same product with different names).

    What it basically consists of is a LCD touch panel (backlit) about the width of a palmpilot but about 1.5x longer, with a "learning" sensor at the back and a very powerful IR emitter on the front.

    The way it works it quite interesting. At the bottom of the screen are 8 buttons, labelled CD, TV, VCR, Sat etc. When you press one of these the buttons on the rest of the screen change to reflect that applicances' functions. So if you switch to VCR from TV, shuttle control buttons appear, and the surround sound stuff goes (in my case). All the buttons are dumb to start with, you point the existing remote at the back to teach it each function during setup. Also, should your device not support one of the functions for which there is a button, you can switch it off so it doesn't clutter the display.

    So that's the practical stuff. Now the importanct stuff - the "wow" factor. 3 things here...people love the fact it changes all it's button labels as you switch mode. The backlight is very cool (touch the screen and it lights up, after a few seconds it _fades_ out...none of this crappy switching off here!! Also it has a macro mode (!) so you can program multiple actions to a single button. So yes, you could have a single button "TV off, CD play, volume low, lights dim, blinds close" romance mode if you really wanted to.

    All in all very swish, but quite pricey at about £100 ($160), and it eats batteries like you would not believe.

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  88. Universal with VCR+ Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1


    Saw one of these years ago, but can't find one now.

    With a VCR+ capable universal remote, a computer interface and a little software it's concievable that you could point and click your taping of TV shows (similar to TVIO but without the monthly charge), allowing for the ultimate timeshifting/comercial avoiding experience.

    Plus, if you have to have a cable box for HBO or something, you won't have to wory about paying $$$ for a VCR+ GOLD capable VCR.

    Perhaps having this on a universal is the wrong way to go, if you leave the remote under a pillow your show won't get recorded. However, if you have a PC in the living room that you leave on all the time (anyone know how loud those new HotWheels PC's are?) and an IR port for your PC (I know my micronics W6-LI PPro MB has a connector for an IR port, do the newer motherboards????)

    Has anyone "cracked" VCR+? Seems like it would be "easy" to make a program that sucks the codes off the web (does www.tvguide.com have vcr+?) and lets you automaticaly schedule your recording.


    trikster2@hotmail.com


  89. Learning Remotes by GNaturist · · Score: 1
    Many years ago I bought an ONKYO stereo that came with a Universal remote. The neatest thing about it was that it had a learn mode that could set it to. You point another remote at it and it captured the signal and assigned it to the button of your choice.

    A friend of mine bought the TV remote software for his palm pilot and his only complaint is the short range of the pilot's IR beam, other than that he thought it was the best remote he had ever had. Right now he's looking for a way to boost the signal.....

    --
    If people were meant to go around nude, they would be born that way!
  90. A/V Producer 8 by UIEC by substrate · · Score: 1

    I've got the A/V Producer 8 by UIEC and it controls everything... except for my Carver tuner. Apparently Carver uses a higher frequency for its I/R port which universal remotes don't use.

    What it does control it controls admirably though.

    I'd buy a Palm Pilot if I knew that it would be able to control my Carver CT-26v.

  91. Re: Color Game Boy Remote Program? by Levine · · Score: 1

    ...could you advise a URL of such a thing?

    See email link, above, also, if you know.

    Levine

  92. Bite the bullet... by Wohali · · Score: 2
    ...and get the Sony. As the guy says, it can be found cheap (I got it for $125), and if you get over the spelling error on the LCD (mine says "Sound Feild" instead of "Sound Field"), it's a great remote.

    I especially like the fact that the batteries for the backlight are separate from the batteries for the remote memory...that's just intelligent design.

    --
    "But always she's the spectre of uncertainty I first endured, then faded, then embraced..."
  93. Marantz RC2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    Features (off the top o' me pointy little head):
    • "Master" buttons for 10 devices. (They call them "function selection" buttons.) These change both the keypad programming and, optionally, can cause your receiver (for example) to switch inputs.
    • Each "master" selection allows unique programming for most of the keypad and all 32 soft-keys (which are selected in four pages of eight each).
    • Labels for soft-keys and their display pages are programmable.
    • Four macro keys. You can actually re-edit the macro sequences without having to re-write 'em from scratch. But it's a bit tricky.
    • Green back-lighting of the display and keys. Automatically enabled by room ambient light. (With fresh batteries, is it ever bright!)
    • Programmable back-lighting for
      • Auto-on when ambient light goes down
      • On-time duration
      • Disable entirely (I think)
      It also has a "light on" key conveniently located on the side. Handy for checking what's presently "selected" without triggering anything.
    I've had my Marantz RC2000 for a couple years now. It's controlling:
    • Yamaha RX-V795 surround sound receiver
    • Hitachi television
    • Pioneer DV-525 DVD player
    • RCA VCR
    • Denon DCD-1100 CD player
    • X-10 home automation devices (via X-10 IR receiver/controller)

    And I have plenty of keys left over. Including an entire section for a DSS box.

    In the past, I've also controlled:

    • JVC VCR
    • Panasonic VCR
    • JVC 501 DVD player
    • Yamaha stereo receiver

    The thing is powerful. In my 14' x 22' room, I can aim the thing just about anywhere reasonable and it triggers the target devices.

    The user's manual is pretty good. The key layout is pretty good, IMO.

    But the unit also has its down-sides :-(.

    • It goes through batteries like poop through a goose! Ignore what the user's manual says--the info in there is hopelessly optimistic. Buy a Ray-O-Vac Renewal system. And don't let the batteries get too low before re-charging. They'll last much longer (take many more re-chargings) if you re-charge early and often.
    • While I do have buttons left, I think I'm out of memory.
    • Teaching the thing can be real tweaky. Particularly jog/shuttle buttons.
    • Stupid thing: there is a set of "cursor" buttons arranged in a "star" pattern with an "ok" button in the middle. Very handy for DVD players and the like. Problem is that you can only program that set of keys with one set of codes, regardless of the "master" or "function" selection! Like, uh, duh, Marantz. (Maybe they fixed this in the Mk. II?)
    • The LCD display has very skinny characters that can be difficult to read. Maybe they improved this in the Mk. II. I don't know.
    • God help you if you lose memory. There is no backup mechanism other than to clone it to another RC2000.
    • The "glass" over the LCD display seems to be overly-susceptible to scratching :-(.

    Final analysis? I like it well enough not to feel the urge to replace it. But I would check the field for what's currently available before buying one again.

    Price? I believe they commonly sell for about US$250.00. I think you'll find them only at high-end audio/home-theater stores.

    1. Re:Marantz RC2000 by brix · · Score: 1
      Agreed on just about everything, but I thought I mention to you that my RC2000's arrow keys are assigned to different devices and I don't have the Mark II. While the user's guide does say that they can only be assigned to one device, it is apparently wrong.

      Something I found on the "RC2000 tips" site:
      - Page 13 of the manual says that some buttons cannot be taught function-dependent operations: "POWER ON/OFF", "VOL", "CURSOR", "MUTE", "OSD", "GUIDE".

      This is not true- I have been able to assign different codes to "CURSOR" and "OSD" that are dependent on whether I am in TV or VCR mode. The other buttons listed do appear to be global, however.
      Of course, something that it also mentions is that there were actually two different versions of the original RC2000 -- the "green or no dot" and the updated "blue dot" models. It has been thought that the only difference between the two is the amount of memory, but maybe the cursor key functions are another difference.

      - Doug
    2. Re:Marantz RC2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Agreed on just about everything, but I thought I mention to you that my RC2000's arrow keys are assigned to different devices and I don't have the Mark II. While the user's guide does say that they can only be assigned to one device, it is apparently wrong.

      Right you are! And thanks very much! Navigating my DVD player in menus and setup is much more user-friendly now that I have buttons whose positions actually mirror the direction I want to go :-).

      I tested that the cursor set actually is mode-specific by programming my DVD player's navigation into it, testing, changing the function to DSS/VCR2 (which is pre-programmed for a DSS unit--thus cancelling any punch-through), and verifying that the cursor keys no longer worked on the DVD player.

      I do have a blue dot in the battery compartment.

      I am nearly out of memory, tho :-(. I had to clear the keys that had been programmed for navigation to make room. Hope I don't have to add anything else!

  94. Remote "control" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a room mate that took a 2x6 and cut it to about 24 inches in length... then put velcro on the board and all his remotes... and stuck 'em to the board. He'd spend hours on the couch with this thing across his lap... fit perfectly! PLUS you never accidentally sit on this thing!

  95. Doesn't do any good for UHF devices by puterGeezer · · Score: 1

    An all-in-one IR remote is all well and good
    but my Dish Network satellite box and remote
    use UHF. No IR remote in the universe is
    gonna do me any good, no matter how programmable
    it is!

    --
    --'puter Geezer
  96. A warning about the HK Take Control by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    IIRC, it's wince based..
    Your Working Boy,

  97. how about a newton or palm? by haledon · · Score: 1

    a friend of mine was at one time playing with the possibility of using an old newton or newer palm (with the irda port) as his own universal remote. he basically was planning on programming the thing to do whatever he wanted. i THINK he said that he got a fair amount of success.

    --
    i want to live life, not just go through the motions
  98. Super-Duper remote control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The Perfect remote:

    I'm not sure if it's available separately or not, but Pioneer has a remote control (for their VSX-29TX receiver) that sounds perfect.

    There's a little flash demo at http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/features/9907-El ite_Remote4.asp

    and the page that describes it more fully is

    http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/features/9907-El ite_Remote1.asp

    Maybe if enough people ask, they'll sell it separately.

  99. Off topic -- AMX (Panja) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is any one interested in an AXCESS Programming system for linux? I've been tinkering with reverse engineering this system for a few weeks. It doesn't look too difficult. email me if you are interested.
    troy.farrell@NOSPAM.wilcom.com

  100. My integrated setup by Machupo · · Score: 1

    I find that the easiest way to get everything in one package is to consolidate everything onto my computer (computer, TV, stereo / home theater, telephone, lights, fan, etc...) with the help of X10.
    To make this a remote setup, just get a cordless keyboard / mouse from Logitech and whip together a remote program.

    --
    *insert pithy sig here*
  101. great universal remote... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with my dvd/reciever/cd changer/tv/vcr setup, i've found that sony's 'av commander' that comes packed with their recievers is the best. it controls my toshiba dvd, my generic vcr, my 50 disc changer, my tv, and the reciever without any problems. two enthusiastic thumbs up! -mac

  102. remotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As others have suggested: goto www.remotecentral.com the Pronto (made by phillips and marants) is the ultimate solution it can be modified into form you want. While the inital learning curve is steep, and all IR codes have to be added individually. they are constantly adding newly discovered codes on various fan sites so you don't have to so the grunt work. it's got a wide beam of dispersal and excellent range, so you can use it in a long room with out worrying about pinpoint accuracy. This remote rocks. The microsoft based remote comes with 250+ prebuilt codes on a cd, so it's easier to get up and running. though, if you've found /. you shouldn't have any probs... and learning new codes on this thing can be a pain. the older marantz remote (2200 mkii) is great but ALL the buttons need to be programmed....and eats batteries like a pig. Executive summary: buy the pronto for versatility, capabilities and battery charging. HEEEEEEEEEEEYYYYYYYYYYYAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHH!

  103. Radio Shack X-10 by gatzke · · Score: 1


    The radio shack wuper-duper remote is terrific. I have used a few of them...

    It is RF and IR, so it can send RF signals to the base (which relays as IR to your stuff) even when you are in another room (or out sitting on the crapper)

    The base can relay X-10 signals to your equipment, but you are limited to 9 at a time.

    The universal support is good. Most everything works. It has standard features like overriding VCR/CBL so you could control three different TVs. The last time I tried, there were some undocumented features, like assigning a TV vol buttong to be vol when in VCR mode.

    It has a couple of macro buttons....So the complex routines of startup and shutdown can be automated.

    The new models have LCD and back lighting.

    It is a bitch to program. I spent a few hours with mine.

    The only problem I found is that some buttons may crap out after heavy use... Maybe the new ones are better.

    Only $50 on sale, may $80 regular...

    BTW- I set mine up where the remote thinks my amp is the TV button, and I use the VCR to change channels. This way, in VCR moode, since VCR doesn't have a volume it uses the TV mode volume (which is the now the amp) The remote thinks the CBL is the TV, so to turn on the TV, I hit CBL on...

  104. Re:MS remote:CRESTRON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have seen a CRESTRON color panel remote and controller.. but for TRUE intergratio, ya cant beat the adcom ball system, or the interface for the runco 200 disk sar 200 dvd changer.... thumbnails of all the currently inserted dvds

  105. Laptop IR Control Software by eriks · · Score: 1

    There's gotta be software to do this...

    Scenario: A Perl Script running on your laptop that loads TVGuide's webpage, and when you select the show you want to record, it programs the cable box and the VCR and what-not with all the appropriate codes and stuff via the IR port in the laptop. Of course, it'd also let you build "contral panels" for all your IR controlled devices. And you could literally "teach" the software by pointing your various remotes at the computer's IR port.

    I've been contemplating writing something like this for a while... but since I'm inherantly lazy, I've been waiting to see if someone else would do it first :-)

  106. X10 Remote with Mouse Capability by LdyArdRhi · · Score: 1
    They also have a "Mouse Remote" that is a bit of a talking dog, but still a cute idea. It has most of the functionality of the learning remote, (except learning, darn it!) a little rocker-disc, and two buttons on the back. Coupled with a little receiver on a serial port, this doojie will control work like a mouse from across the room. I say it's a talking dog because, even tho it works, seeing what you're doing on the screen from across the room is a bit of a stretch. I also have the learning remote, and it is WAY cool. There is supposedly a high-power IR emitter unit available for Palm that will snap onto the serial port...and software for using it as a remote that even flips the display so you can hold it with the emitter towards the screen and read it. I haven't seen it in person, but I have seen it mentioned on the Web somewhere. --- Lady ArdRhi

    +~+~+~+~+~+~+

    All disagreements boil down to "my orgasm is bigger than your orgasm". -- Solomon Short

    1. Re:X10 Remote with Mouse Capability by dozing · · Score: 1

      Yeah The mouse remote is great, except the RF coming out of my computer causes mine to jump around the screen on it's own about once a minute (but It does allow me to always appear active with the alladvantage viewbar, nothing like earning money while you sleep) I was also dissapointed that the mouse remote wasn't learning.

      I haven't really looked into it, but has anyone developed any linux software for the advanced functions of the mouse remote?

      Dozing
      http://www.dozings.com "The Fun is only a click away"

      --
      Dozings.com -- Its kinda funny... If you're as crazy as me.
  107. How about a calculator ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I own a HP 48G calculator, and it too has an IR port. The positive things are :
    - the send part is high-powered enough (at least on the HP), but this is due to the high grade of quality most of these top-notch calculators have.
    - you have the added bonus that virtually all software for it is free. You even have a very nice remote program for the HP, completely free, with a lot of preprogrammed remotes.
    - you never run out of buttons to assign things to (calculators have a LOT of buttons
    - it's also a calculator ! ;-)
    The downside is it's bulky and ugly as hell, and rather expensive too (although low-end models like the HP 48S aren't _that_ expensive, and they too have an IR port)
    Another negative part about the HP in specific is the small frequency range, which doesn't allow it to emulate all remotes.

  108. Sony RM-Y903 Remote Commander by _egg · · Score: 2

    I can't seem to find the specific entry for this model on Sony's website, but they apparently offer it as the standard remote for their big screen TVs now. I picked one up at a local Sony store. For about $90, it replaced my VCR, TV, DVD, amp, etc. remotes. It's a little big, but it's got a nice backlit blue LCD screen, is completely programmable, etc. You have to pick from preselected labels for the buttons on the screen, but I found everything I wanted there. Several nice features, including an easy way to link the volume in all states to the volume of your amp. Also three "system state" buttons... I programmed one each for watching TV, video tapes, and DVDs. Each turns on the appropriate items, sets the amp to the correct source, puts the tv on the appropriate input, etc. Very nice remote, and reduced clutter in my living room to nothing. Very easy to find due to size. =)

    Incidentally, I learned a little known fact about most TVs in doing the programming of this remote... If you want to have a button that lands you on Video 2, for example, in the course of doing other things, you may think you're screwed because you don't know what video source you were on before that. With only one button that says "TV/Video", how do you properly switch among N sources? It turns out that (with Sonys, and I'm sure many others) you can hold down the TV/Video button while you press the number corresponding to the source you want to watch. Very handy!! Spread the word!

  109. Easy, Cheap do-it-all remote by bporter · · Score: 1

    If you've got a Palm III (or a palm pilot equipped with a IR port), theres' a program called OmniRemote made by Pacific Neo-Tek (http://www.pacificneotek.com/) that'll turn your palm into a remote. The nice thing is that it's cheap, the neat thing is that it runs off your palm, and the even-neater-than-neat thing is that instead of coming with a long list of manufacturers IR codes, it reads the functions off your remote control. Say, to program it to control your DVD player, you'd create a new category called 'DVD Player', place a power button on screen, click the power button, then point your remote control at the palm's IR port and press the power button on it. Voila! It's an awsome product. Really cool.

    I had the same problem, and this thing set me up.

  110. Marantz has it all by ceranta · · Score: 1

    If you're serious about your home theatre and you prefer to have top quality system, then shelling out around $300 for a remote is a drop in the hat. I can easily pay that much for speaker wires. Trying to play around with the Palm just doesn't seem worth it, and buying an "all-in-one" for $30 will definetly not work no matter what the pretty box says.

    I came across a remote that has it all about a year ago:
    Marantz RC2000
    It's programmable, has a large LCD screen that you can change, and it can control almost anything including your Craftmatic Adjustable Bed. It was ~$250 when I checked it out, it's probably cheaper now.

    I just noticed that they have made a newer, sleaker model. It looks great, and it comes with software to program the device. It even has a rechargeable battery pack. I don't know the price on this one, but I'd say in the $300-400 range.

    So if you want a quality product to go along with your high quality system, go with the Marantz, or the Harman Kardon. If you just want a cheap fix, go with the other solutions. You will get what you pay for.

    --cr

  111. Such a device might be being designed right now. by wireframe · · Score: 1

    Last time I saw my cousin, who is currently working on a doctorate in computer science, said he is working on a project like this with some other people at his university... But that's about all I remember about it. =(

  112. Remotes by RJ11 · · Score: 1

    I myself use my Palm V to control all of my components, however I have seen 2 better solutions. Both Marantz and Philips make learning remotes that are back-lit, learning, and have huge lcds. Though if you have a Palm, you can save yourself about $200, though you probably won't get the range that these remotes offer.

  113. Re:Computer-controlled (Pro Producer 7) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I have a Pro Producer 7 remote. I don't know if they make them anymore, I got it a couple of years ago at Circuit City for $30 or $40.

    Anyway, this remote is very nice. It is pre-programmed for all sorts of equipment, plus it has a whole extra pad of buttons that can learn from other remotes. And buttons can be swapped around (for example, I've programmed the Volume buttons on the "CD" mode to control the stereo volume.) It also has a macro feature, so you can make one button two a sequence of 5 other things. (or whatever).

    But, now here's the really cool part! I was surfing around for some more info about this remote a couple of months ago, and found a web page that describes a RS232 adaptor that plugs into other models of this same brand of remote. They have a 3-pin connector in the battery compartment, and apparently can be controlled from your computer. So, I opened up my battery cover, and sure enough - it has a connector! The thing is, though, mine has a 6-pin connector. So I don't think the exact adaptor for the other ones would work with mine. But, it should definitely be RS232 compatible.

    So you can plug the remote into your computer, and the computer can basically control the remote. Tell it to simulate button presses, essentially. I'm not much of an EE guy, so I haven't taken the time to figure out the 6-pin connector on my remote, but it does have that possibility if somebody wants to hack on one!

    So.. The Pro Producer 7 remote. URL is http://www.oneforall.com/. Learning, macro functinos, and apparently can be interfaced with RS232 with the right adaptor.

    -Joel

  114. DAK LEARNING REMOTE by computx · · Score: 1

    I have a learning remote i bought years ago from DAK, i control my stereo,tv,sattelite dish, vcr, and cd player with it. anyone know if DAK is still in business

  115. Remote Reviews by Timmy · · Score: 1

    Gareth Branwyn's Street Tech site has reviews of a few of the programmable remotes. No rip-n-read press release fluff, but real, "I used this and here's what's good and here's what's bad about it" kinds of reviews. Most of the ultra-programmable remotes are indeed rather expensive, but I know I've probably spent that much on just random remotes looking for just one that'll let me program my VCR again.

  116. SL-9000 by artemb · · Score: 1

    I've been using SL-9000 and I'm pretty happy about it. It's programmable - if SL-9000 does not have built-in codes for your device, it can always learn the trick from original remote.

    It can assign a sequence of commands to some of the buttons. It comes pretty handy when you want to turn on/off cable box/TV/ VCR all at once.

    The most useful feature is that you can assign any function to any button if you have original remotes. I've set up my SL9000 that it controls TV/CABLE/VCR without mode switching and the button layout is the one *I* think is right, not the menufacturer. :-)

    All in all, Once I've set everything up, I've never used other remotes ever since.

    Did I mention it's damn powerful? I can point it in any direction in a room and it works perfectly.

    For $100 it's hard to beat if you have more than 1 device to control, and it's simply essential if some of your devices have weird features other "universal" RC manufacturers didn't think about. Before RC-9000 I tried several such RCs and neither was able to control my digital cable box.

  117. My Solution by micahjd · · Score: 1

    Some people might call this overkill, or even crazy, but I found a solution that works well, and is open source and relatively cheap.
    I have small IR LEDs taped next to the IR windows on my VCR and TV. They are connected to a Parallax BASIC Stamp that accepts signals from my linux computer's serial port, and generates the IR signals. (with the help of a 555 chip to modulate it at 40khz).
    I use X10 on all the lights in the room, and I have an ActiveHome X10 transciever on the computer. I use heyu, some perl scripts, and xtend with the ActiveHome.
    I can use an X10 remote, the command line, or a small Perl/Tk app to control my lights, my TV/VCR, or even Netscape.

    --
    -- 2 + 2 = 5, for very large values of 2
  118. A Vote for the Philips Pronto by Aramis · · Score: 1

    I've owned the Philips Pronto for about 3 months. I don't have an extraordinary home theater system, but it is complex enough that I have never found a universal remote up to the task until now. Learning remotes are good, but they never have the right buttons on them, but they always have a bunch of buttons I'll never use cluttering up the remote. Sony's RM-AV2000 remote is nice, but it still limits you to their pre-defined button names. AFAIK, the only remotes that allow you to create dynamic button names are the Harmon-Kardon Take Control and the Philips Pronto/Marantz RC5000. Between those two, only the Pronto allows you to actually design the GUI. This feature alone wins me. It allows me to replicate the button look of the original remote, or more often, use a completely different layout that is more appropriate to my usage style. The unit comes with the Pronto Edit (win95) software and a serial cable, which allow you to edit all the graphic panels, learn and assign IR codes, save and load device files, import BMP graphics, etc. If you decide to go with the Pronto, make sure to check out the files section of http://www.remotecentral.com They have device files for many components, as well as alternate button graphics, etc.

    Philips' propaganda is available at:
    http://www.pronto.philips.com/

  119. Remotes by KimmBadd · · Score: 1

    Unless every piece of your system comes from the same company, then you are going to have to use more than one remote. How often do you really change some settings. I can turn on all of my components with one remote, but that had more to do with which piece plugged into who. Example: the TV into the cable box into the VCR on and on and on.

    --
    I have a big bag full of two cents and I'm coming your way.
  120. The REAL solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real solution is to get rid of all your separate devices. Why buy a stereo, a VCR, a TV, etc.. when you can do almost everything with your PC??

    Then you can control all your "media players" (i.e. the PC) with one remote through your PC's IR port.

    There's some software out there that lets you do this already.. and it's free at
    www.winremote.com

  121. http://home-automation.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a note on this subject, http://home-automation.org has a Hardware -> Remote Controls section that covers pretty much every that has been mentioned here about remotes. It's a good source for everything you want to know about them, or at least how to find the info you want.

  122. Lego Mindstorms? by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    Is there a programable IR interface w/ Mindstorms? (I haven't bought any yet.. bills :P) It'd be fun to have a remote that was made of legos. :)

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  123. CORE (was Re:Cloud 9) by Jamie+Zawinski · · Score: 2
    The Woz made the ultimate IR remote a few years back, called the "Cloud 9", it could learn any other remote and was fully programmable. Of course, it was 65C02 based.

    A rare find indeed, the market was not ready for that much remote.

    Woz's remote was called the CORE (Cloud 9 was the company name.) I believe it was the first memorizing programmable remote control on the market.

    I owned one (still do, it's around here somewhere...) The thing was a complete piece of junk. Programming it was like using a combination of assembler and APL, it had lousy range, and it burned through its batteries in about two weeks (forgetting all its programming, of course.)

    It did have buttons labelled 0 through F, though, which I thought was cute...

    It was a very neat device for the time, and definitely groundbreaking. But as far as being a usable remote control -- well, sadly, no. It wasn't that the market wasn't ready for it, it was that the thing just wasn't any good.

    1. Re:CORE (was Re:Cloud 9) by Tim+Pierce · · Score: 1

      The thing was a complete piece of junk. Programming it was like using a combination of assembler and APL, ...

      You say that like it's a bad thing or something.

  124. One For All Brand Remotes by Gray · · Score: 1

    Look for them, they're common at Future Shop here.

    They look like your generic per-programmed universal, but past the $30 model, they aren't..

    I have a quite old One-For-All Home Theater, cost me $60 CDN some years ago.. Out of the box, it's a fully macroable (any sequence you want, no pauses though), completely redefinable (any key to any code or macro), 6 mode remote..

    At one point I mailed it back to All-For-One to get it upgraded for the codes for my obscure Sherwood amp, which they where very good about.. Even sent me a spare before I had to send them the remote.

    Final perk, a little 4 pin port hidden inside the battery flap.. This has been hacked by the net now and allows you to make a little cable and interface it to windows or linux in a variety of ways, similar to one of those homebrew IR gizmos.

    If you want more then that, I suggest doing the hacked Palm or HP48 thing.

    1. Re:One For All Brand Remotes by Stavr0 · · Score: 1

      S'more cool stuff about One-For-All 'magic' codes: http://people.ne.mediaone.net/wasser/OFA
      ---

  125. Remotes by Noah+Horton · · Score: 1

    The Harmon Kardon is OK, but there are better ones. If you want a really complete universal that does not require software to change it, try the Marantz RC2000. If you want a good one that does require software, try the Marantz RC5000. Marantz makes far better stuff than HK. Also Adcom makes a REALLY advanced system that you could look at.

  126. IrDa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should be able to do this with IrDa.

  127. philips pronto the best there is for under $200 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Philips makes an awesome remote that is programmable and does not run winCE. Info at www.pronto.philips.com

  128. Worth it? by Tyrell+Hawthorne · · Score: 1

    Worth it? That depends on lots of stuff. How serous you are about getting one, how much money you've got, how many other toys are higher on the "I-want" list and so on. Simply, that depends.

  129. for only 100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Granted there are better remotes out there, but for only 110 there is no way to beat the functionality. Check out www.remotecentral.com for a full review of the sony, the philips, and others. Plus there is a message board to ask users how they feel.

  130. X10 MouseRemote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a remote from X10 called the MouseRemote and it sells for $25. Its RF so you don't need any line of sight. It will control your computer, tv, vcr, dvd, etc. Plus there is a program which will control Winamp with the X10 MouseRemote. Someone wrote software for it that is better than the included software. He puts the source up and everything. I bet you could port it to linux if you so wanted. It looks pretty awesome. Here is the link: http://www.x10.com/products/x10_mk19a.htm

  131. you can program almost any infared device to do th by danka · · Score: 1

    Almost any infared device can be programmed to act as a remote for any number of devices, including, but not limited to, cd players, lights, whatever.

    A friend of mine programmed his graphing calculator to replace our remote control, and he also made it so that it would control a bunch of other devices.

    (you can mail him: dsummers "at" warren-wilson.edu)

    --
    --Danka, who likes kids, but wouldn't want to eat one
  132. Pronto, Pilot etc. by Iluvatar · · Score: 1
    I am a happy user of a Phillips Pronto remote. I also have a Palm Pilot and I had tried using that to control my devices.

    In brief, here are the main points of Pronto vs. Pilot:

    • With its own IR transmitter, the Pilot is pretty much useles as a remote (you need to be about 3-4 feet from the device, which is too close). However, there is a little gadget that plugs into the cradle port and is supposed to extend the range, which I haven't tried.
    • The Pilot's screen is too small to accomodate enough buttons (personally, I'd be happier even if the Pronto had a bigger screen, which is already much bigger than the Palm's).
    • If, like me, you like the lights low when watching movies, then the Pilot will eat up batteries in no time (whereas the Pronto's batteries tend to last much longer for this particular use -- even without the charging cradle, I don't really have a problem, I change batteries every 2-3 months, and I use it evey day for at least an hour).
    Now, for the Pronto vs. Take Control, I do not have personal experience with the latter, but as far as I've read (mostly when trying to decide):
    • First of all Take Control is partly developed by Microsoft (the software etc. are Microsofts). This is not necessarily a bad thing... Anyway, it's up to you to decide whether it counts.
    • From what I've read, Pronto has a stronger beam. In particular, the beam's dispersion is much wider (unless all your devices are dead ahead from where you're sitting, you should probably take this into account).
    • The Pronto's programming capabilities are much better. However, Take Control is supposedly easier to program by your mom and dad that do not know anything about computers. But, if you're a "poweruser" then Pronto is probably the best.
    • The receiver (but not the transmitter) on Take Control can handle higher frequencies than Pronto's. However, you can find Pronto CCFs on the net for most of the devices that emit non-standard high-frequency codes (see below).
    • The distribution network in the US for Take Control is better and you'll probably find it a little cheaper than Pronto.

    If you want more information about these and other programmable remotes, an excellent site is:
    www.remotecentral.com

    Finally, for the Pronto, you do not have to take my (or anyone's) word: There is a user community at www.prontoedit.com, with links to the Pronto emulator (runs under MS Windoze) and many CCFs (that is configuration files with screens, commands, macros, etc etc that you can incorporate into your own... designs and download into Pronto). Good luck!

  133. Followup - Pronto, Pilot etc. by Iluvatar · · Score: 1
    Oh, I forgot about these (I've only seen them in home theater magazines' articles about high end installations, but you might be interested)...

    Have a look at these sites for cool programmable control systems ("remote" is too small a word for these ;-):

    • Crestron -- Definitely the coolest I've seen!
    • SmartLinc -- Not as impressive as the first, but still...

    Of course now we're out from the $300-400 price range... more like $700-$2000 (sic)! Happy drooling! ;-)

  134. manual programmable universal remote by kavalier · · Score: 1

    I have a universal remote that I got several years ago, it was one of the first "universal" ones on the market, and it has a little eye on the back of the remote. You set the TV/VCR/etc remote behind it, press program, press the button you want on the original remote, then press the button where you want it to be set to and its all set... the universal remote has like 6 modes so you can use 6 or so devices, and it has like tons of buttons, most are labeled but it has lots of unlabeled ones too and a place to write something for them.. and it'll work with any remote, doesnt matter what kind or anything, it captures all signals.. its really neat, and we only spent like $40 I think, maybe less, it was pretty cheap and its awesome, still works... but it uses like 8 AA batteries and they dont last as long because it also has a huge LCD display that can be illuminated... I dunno if they still sell 'em, I havent seen any like it since, but its nice :)

    --
    my blog sucks, does yours?
  135. Mitsubishi... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Though I haven't seen just the remote for sale by itself... And they've got neato lit keypads. (Unless you hit your brother with it, breaking the button..domestic violence is bad, mmmkay?)

  136. DVD Anywhere (Re:X10 MouseRemote) by Amiga86 · · Score: 1

    This Mouse works great with my VCR and all of my housemates VCR's. Works good with the TV's in the house too. I got mine with the X-10 DVD anywhere video transmitter.

  137. Re:The one I *want* doesn't exist,but two runners- by BrK · · Score: 1

    The SL-9000 is probably what you're looking for. I hate to drop in a shameless plug, but we sell it online at http://www.futurestandard.com for $95.
    It is a pre-programmed remote that can learn over 300 additional codes. It supports macros, has keys for practically everything you need, and can control up to 8 devices. Yadda yadaa yadda...
    It puts most other remotes to shame. The same company will have a touchscreen version out in about 4 weeks. Street price should be around $200. This remote will have several 'hard' buttons, with a configurable touchscreen at the top.

    BTW, the TakeControl is bulky and clunky, we sell those too, but not too many.

    --
    -This sig intentionally left blank
  138. BYTE -- had plans for one years back by cpuffer_hammer · · Score: 1

    It had an LCD screen and 4 buttons so you could scrol through the commands you had recoreded and pick the one you wanted. You could also build you own groups so preset your system or to move your antena when you changed channels. I think it could also interface with your computer so you could download and edit you programs.

    I think with these plans, a free OS, and a good bit of updating could make a realy good remote.

  139. True Universal Remote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There seems to be two markets for universal remote controls:
    1) The geek market (eg Slashdot Readers) which are quite happy to do their own remote programming (This seems to have been covered by the previous comments);
    2) The mass consumer market - none of the solutions proposed so far would appeal to the general public. My proposal is as follows:
    Hardware: any PDA type device with a touch sensitive screen of roughly the size of a Palm Pilot (although size variations could easily be accomodated)
    Operating System: any (Linux would be the obvious choice)
    Software: the remote control unit itself would contain a cut-down version of a browser, able to parse XML. Each device (VCR, TV, HiFi, CD Player, etc) would contain documents (in XML) which define the buttons and information to be displayed on the PDA and the functionality to occur when the button is pressed eg what code the remote should send to the unit.
    The browser would include some simple mechanism for switching between hardware eg a set of tabs across the top or bottom (or sides), one tab for each piece of hardware.
    The software in the VCR and other units (and the remote control itself) could be updated via the internet (through the PDA).
    An XML standard would need to be created and then evolve to handle generic remote control of hardware. This standard could be used for nearly all hardware devices, eg all home appliances, all office equipment, vehicles etc.
    Transmission of the signal could be either Infrared or wireless (eg BlueTooth).
    The XML documents stored in the hardware units should be customizable for anyone to change (either on the PDA itself, or via upload to and change on a personal computer), otherwise intelligent people everywhere (aka geeks) would be reluctant to buy in.

    Advantages: indefinitely upgradeable, handles multiple form factors, and is easy to use.

    Disadvantages: lack of tactile feedback when you pushed the 'buttons'; you would need a backlight to operate the unit in low light conditions {eg while watching TV)} which would affect battery performance.

    What do you think? Is this a useful Universal Remote Control or am I missing something?

    Michael Richards

  140. Re:Palm-remote by macno · · Score: 1

    There is a small gadget that will extend the IR range of the Palm. It is sold by the same people that makes the OmniRemote program....

  141. X10 Learning Remote by cswan · · Score: 1

    No, this is not another shameless X10.com plug :)

    X10.com has the Learning Remote, and it should pretty much do what you're looking for. Here's a direct link:

    http://www.x10.com/products/x10_ur24a.htm

    It's cheap, and you can probably pick it up 'for free' if you get some other crap from their site.

    It has your typical preprogrammed set of IR codes for many devices. But it can also learn--you just hit the record button, stick your source remote in front of the thing, and transmit/capture. That makes it possible to have it memorize the codes for whatever bizarre remotes that you have.

    [I have it, and it works...for the most part. I've found some quirks with it, but those quirks only seemed to be because I was programming several different devices into one set of 'presets.' I was setting the 'VCR' presets to do the volume up/down on my stereo, the channel up/down the channels on the VCR, and the 'mute' to be power on the TV. It didn't seem to like memorizing this broad range of frequencies for one function (VCR, in this case) I could program to the individual buttons ('TV' just for TV stuff, 'VCR' just for VCR stuff) just fine.]

  142. Lexicon 700T by pablodiablo · · Score: 1

    The best I have seen is the Lexicon 700T, also has an RF version. Very $$$$ but will do it all.

  143. Re:CORE by Jamie+Zawinski · · Score: 2
    This crossed my path recently:
    From: cary@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary Kittrell)
    Newsgroups: alt.fan.cecil-adams
    Subject: Re: Consumer electronics (was: A few random questions)
    Date: 22 Jul 1999 22:52:23 GMT

    In article pg@sff.net writes:

    After quitting from Apple Computer, Steve Wozniak designed a universal remote that apparently was VERY programmable. I would love to get one, but unfortunately they were sold for a very short time (too powerful for the FCC, or something like that).

    Ohmigod. Oh my god! That was the CORE, and I have two or three of them sitting in my drawer right now. Want one? They broke easily, and didn't repair too solidly.

    I have long lost count of how many languages I've programmed, but this was easily the hardest -- and I'm including languages like Ladder Diagram Notation here. You could do anything, but damn! did you have to be tenacious far beyond the call of geekery. As I recall, basically you could set a timer to act as if you had pushed a buton at a certain time, and you programmed by putting instructions under that button -- mostly pushes of other buttons, under which you had put pushes of other buttons -- and the only way you really got anything useful done was to include under a given button instructions which said "next time you're pushed, edit your own current instructions, changing them to the following set:...". In other words, this was not an environment in which you employed self-modifying code as a space-saver or a geeky tour-de-force -- self-modifying code was the _only_ way to implement things like counters and possibly (if I recall correctly) even IF/ELSE.

    I now write programs which generate and polish really really big telescope mirrors. I was much prouder of being able to write programs which would tell the CORE "turn on both VCRs, then after 5:30 change the channel to..."

    I think I still have the manual, if you'd like me to copy it.