Slashdot Mirror


Loki to Distribute Quake III Arena

Everyone in the known universe has been submitting the news that Loki Software will be publishing and distributing Quake III Arena for Linux. The game will be published Dec. 27. The box will be a limited-edition collector's tin box and will include SuSE Linux 6.3. Asking price is 50$.

277 comments

  1. Please, please, please... by Wah · · Score: 3

    ...someone make a "gaming" distro for Linux. Please!!!!

    (1st p0s7)

    --
    +&x
    1. Re:Please, please, please... by Signal+11 · · Score: 1
      rpm -Uvh quake2-1.06.i386.rpm
      ##############################

      bofh:~#

      Please pay $49.95 plus s&h now.

    2. Re:Please, please, please... by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1
      What a great idea - bundle the accelerated servers with the latest kernel and market it at a slightly higher price. I know I would buy it just for convenience sake.

      Why hasn't anyone already done this?

    3. Re:Please, please, please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's a bad idea. The "accelerated servers", if you're referring to Accelerated-X, aren't so much. If you're referring to XFree86's "accelerated servers", everyone already includes them.

    4. Re:Please, please, please... by seaportcasino · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, that would be so cool. In fact, I would venture to say it might be the most popular distro of all time! For Linux to gain mindshare (and corresponding marketshare), we need to make it the best game platform out there. We really can't settle for being a close second to Windows 98 or even on par with them.

      We can't rest until every game runs a little better, a little faster, a little more reliably on Linux.

      We can't rest until games start coming out a little earlier on linux than windows.

      And we can't rest until Linux finally has unique game titles that do NOT exist on Windows.

      GO, LOKI, GO!

  2. All well and good, but.. by Elvii · · Score: 2

    Personally, I might buy it just so I can play with the new improved BFG, but I'd rather see some good flightsims/stragety games come out for linux... thou I know none of that is gonna happen till after Xfree 4.0 and DRI. So hurry up, Xfree! :)

    David

    bash: ispell: command not found

    --
    This sig left intentionally blank.
    1. Re:All well and good, but.. by Kinthelt · · Score: 1

      Check out Flightgear.org if you're looking for a flightsim. It's still under development, but it looks pretty promising!

      --

      "Evil will always triumph over good, because good is dumb." - Dark Helmet (Spaceballs)

    2. Re:All well and good, but.. by dangermouse · · Score: 1

      There is no BFG, only Zuul.

  3. Cool! by hattig · · Score: 2

    Wow! I can buy a game and get the OS for it too! Brilliant.

    A great marketing idea, sell the Linux version of the game with the OS, so that increases uptake of Linux ("Oh, I won't buy that version, 'cos I can't be bothered to get Linux") and it makes the box heavier, so you must be getting more, right?

    Just buying the game would mean that you could update all those slightly old programs you have for little effort. And it is a great coup for SuSE, as everyone who buys Quake III will have a copy of their distribution, and wouldn't you try it out on a spare partition just because?

    1. Re:Cool! by Leddie · · Score: 1

      Heck..I was just about to order SUSE and now I get Quake III with it! Only thing...has anybody tried it with TNT GL drivers?

    2. Re:Cool! by greenfly · · Score: 1

      Works ok on my TNT/K6-400. Just need to get the Nvidia Mesa and X binaries. It's not too fast though, I'm looking forward to Nvidia's OpenGL being released this month, and (in the future) XFree86 4.0. Until then, it works, but not as speedy as I'd like. Q2 runs fast enough though.

  4. Never in my life... by edmz · · Score: 0

    ..have i been waiting so bad for a game. Its crazy. BTW, any gamers from Monterrey, MX ? Greetz!"

  5. Eh... by Powers · · Score: 1
    I dunno... am I the only one not excited about Quake? Sure, I cut my teeth on Doom, like everyone else, but Quake just doesn't hold the attraction to me that other games do.

    It's mostly because it's a FPS, but I do like the Dark Forces games. Then again, maybe that's just the Star Wars aspect.

    Powers&8^]

    --

    Powers&8^]

    1. Re:Eh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Gaming consoles are the way to go. The only thing PC's had on gaming consoles was internet connectivity. Dreamcast has it and PS2 will also. Dreamcast comes with USB port and PS2 comes with ethernet card and USB port as well. Game designers have in console games a consistent platform which which to design games. None of this worrying about which 3D cards or Sound cards to support. The games available on Dreamcast can't be duplicated on the PC.

    2. Re:Eh... by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1
      Have you tried it? If you have the bandwidth (cable or xDSL) and a good graphics card it really is quite insane.

      Doom was fun for a while but multiplayer Q3Arena rocks. I don't know anything about the Dark Forces games; gotta check the store ...

    3. Re:Eh... by osu-neko · · Score: 2
      I dunno... am I the only one not excited about Quake?

      Nope. Doom was amusing for about 15 minutes, after which it got pretty boring and tedious. The exploration aspect is cool when you enter a new area, trying to find secret places etc, but it gets old quick. Not enough variety in how to get things done. Tomb Raider (which I know is technically not an FPS) managed to hold my interest longer due to more variety in terms of exploration and things to do to get places (rather than simply "find the key"). But even that got dull after a while. I did win the game, but around by the time I got past The Cisturn(sp?) the only thing keeping me going was the fact that I was so close to the end... and it did improve for the finale. The point being, the same damn thing over and over and over again gets pretty dull after a while. Doom was very very bad in this respect, and Quake hasn't seemed to me to be much of an improvement in any version. Aside from looking prettier, the whole thing still involves running around shooting things and not much else, and with very little variation in how its done (a different looking gun isn't a variation in how its done -- gernades are, but what else?).

      What I want to see most is something like C&C, Warcraft/Starcraft, maybe something like Age of Wonders (Warlords done right), and most of all, an update for my all time favorite game: Master of Orion II.

      --

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    4. Re:Eh... by seaportcasino · · Score: 1

      If you don't like multi-player networked battles, then quake is just not your cup of tea. There's no reason why everybody has to like the same types of games.
      But some people just enjoy committing virtual bloodbath/execution style murders over and over from the comfort of their own home :)

    5. Re:Eh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> The games available on Dreamcast can't be duplicated on the PC. Oh yeagh? How about writing a Dreamcast emulator? >>None of this worrying about which 3D cards or Sound cards to support. If you want easy stuff to do, write Tetris(tm), checkers or something. If you want to do something cutting edge, then don't expect this being easy. Besides, you totally miss that PCs are being developed at much faster pace than consoles. Just look at these insanely fast and cheap 3D cards, and more to go.

    6. Re:Eh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try Heretic2 the FPS genre is TIRED a 3rd person game ROCKS http:www.hereticii.com Raven games ROCKS

    7. Re:Eh... by Wolfier · · Score: 1

      Any chance that an FPS is made with all the variety of weapons available in, say, Worms Armageddon?

      Mines, cluster bombs, homing missiles, ninja ropes, blowtorches, dynamites, gasoline bombs, poison skunks, firethrowers...wouldn't it be fun?

    8. Re:Eh... by MullaH · · Score: 1

      ever heard of quake mods?

    9. Re:Eh... by Rational · · Score: 1

      Third-person shooters are the stupidest idea ever. Almost as dumb as a first-person platform game.

      --
      "Be nice, veer left, and never stop thinking" Iain Banks - Walking On Glass
  6. Why is this not... by jeremy+f · · Score: 2

    Why isn't it just going to be bundled into the Win32 box? I thought that was id's original idea -- to have both the Win & Linux executables on one CD. Has Activision pulled a GT, i.e. they're not willing just to include an /unsupported folder on the CD?

    Well, until I find a box (tin or not) that has both the Win32 & Linux executables's bundled, I'm not gonna buy.

    1. Re:Why is this not... by cxreg · · Score: 1

      Carmack decided to do this for tracking purposes afaik. He recommended that everyone wait for their version of the game so that other game companies would see that there actually *is* a demand for alterative OS games. I think he is absolutely right and strongly suggest you do so :)

    2. Re:Why is this not... by litesgod · · Score: 1

      If you read/remember reading, there was an article about this on /. a few weeks ago. Carmack would like it to have been this way, but the distributors are the ones that make the final decision. As for a hybrid win32/Linux/Mac cd, it looks doubtfull, but id has said that they will release some sort of patch that will allow you to install the win32 binaries on a Linux platform (or Mac, or any combination of the 3). However, they are not going to release this until a few weeks after the Linux and Mac distributions have hit the shelves, so from the looks of it it will be early in 2000 before we have that ability.

    3. Re:Why is this not... by Bad+Mojo · · Score: 2

      "Well, until I find a box (tin or not) that has both the Win32 & Linux executables's bundled, I'm not gonna buy."

      Well, I guess you're never going to buy it, then. And I would hope you stick to this statement because I would hate to see you not buy what you want.

      IE: Don't go around shouting out definite statements when you don't even know what's going on.


      Bad Mojo

      --
      Bad Mojo
      "If you can't win by reason, go for volume." -- Calvin
    4. Re:Why is this not... by treke · · Score: 0

      Not quite on topic, but jeremy mentions an unsupported folder. My understanding that the Linux version is a fully supported product. Is this incorrect?
      treke

    5. Re:Why is this not... by treke · · Score: 1

      Not quite on topic, but jeremy mentions an unsupported folder. My understanding that the Linux version is a fully supported product unlike Unreal tournament. Is this incorrect?
      treke

    6. Re:Why is this not... by treke · · Score: 1

      Oops sorry, didn't mean to post twice
      treke

    7. Re:Why is this not... by squistle · · Score: 1

      Quake III will absolutely be supported on Linux. All of us at Loki Tech Support have been dutifully playing the demo version to prepare for it. :)

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't.
    8. Re:Why is this not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I agree. Here's why:

      I love Linux but Quake 3 performance under Linux (more specifically under X) is far short of it's performance under Windows (at least on my TNT 2 Ultra). I can marginally play the game at 640x480 under Linux (framerate is pretty low and it is way too dark) whereas I can play it decently at 1024x768 under Windows. What hardcore gamer is going to be willing to take that kind of performance hit just to cast a vote for Linux? Be realistic Carmack/ID, it is _unfair_ to judge the demand for games under Linux when the playing field isn't even (yet)!

      I'm also not going to take a chance that XFree86 4.0 is going to be the magical key that solves all 3D performance problems (it's not even going to be out until sometime in Q1, 2000). I _would_ however buy the Linux version if I could then download the Windows version for free.

    9. Re:Why is this not... by jeremy+f · · Score: 1

      To me, it's the opposite. My Voodoo2 crashes in Windows in Q3A, while in Linux it's silky smooth (albeit being 800x600 & 16 bit color). Although my Matrox G200 renders Q3A in Windows fairly well (and looks a little bit better due to color depth than the Voodoo2), it's slow on my P3-450.

      I agree with you, if I can download the Win32 binaries, I'll buy the Linux version. Maybe if we're reallly lucky Loki will add in an /unsupported folder on THEIR cd with the Win32 binaries.

      Nah. That won't happen...

    10. Re:Why is this not... by whoop · · Score: 1

      I think his point was that most Linux people will take it even if it's not fully supported on the tech support lines. For those pointy-hairs in game companies out there that don't want to fill their knowledge databases will Linux entries. Are there any tech support lines that are more than reading from their database and asking you to reboot it and try again?

  7. Price by fsck · · Score: 1

    Wow only 50$ american, that means that in canada it will be well over 100$. Ill be first in line.
    Not.

    --

    Lars - ...I could always phone Linus when I had a problem.
    1. Re:Price by Kinthelt · · Score: 1

      Closer to $75, actually. A bit on the high-end of the spectrum of game prices, but still cheaper than MS-FS2k

      --

      "Evil will always triumph over good, because good is dumb." - Dark Helmet (Spaceballs)

    2. Re:Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So petition for statehood. Might as well anyway... we're just tacking the extra $1 onto books and $25 onto Quake 3 because we can't do that to Wyoming. ;)

  8. Place your pre-orders, everyone. by Dast · · Score: 2

    https://www.lokigames.com/

    Here's to hoping Loki makes some serious cash on this. They've done a damn fine job.

    Question about the Suse bundle tho: can you order q3 without Suse? (I can't seem to find any info on loki's site...)

    --

    This sig is false.

    1. Re:Place your pre-orders, everyone. by Grits+Boy · · Score: 0

      Hi people. I've just poured hot grits down my pants !!!

      Quick question. Does anyone know if there is a grits gun in Q3? If not, I will not buy it. I am tired of grits being a second class food product and weapon. What is more fearsome than a gun that shoots grits? Nothing. John Carmack needs to stop discriminating against grits and realize that we grits people are serious gaming enthusiasts with a lot of dollars to burn.

      --

      Linux and grits down my pants. Does it get any better?



    2. Re:Place your pre-orders, everyone. by pmsyyz · · Score: 1

      Loki didnt really do much at all. They are the Linux distributor, they are not in charge of the Linux port. Zoid is who was in charge of the Linux version and coding CTF.

      --
      Phillip
    3. Re:Place your pre-orders, everyone. by Dast · · Score: 2

      Pardon. I meant they have done a good job in the past. Sorry about that.

      --

      This sig is false.

  9. Bad Timing? by cxreg · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or is this the single worst day of the year to release a product?

    1. Re:Bad Timing? by Eccles · · Score: 3

      Not at all. Think about it, you've got thousands of computer geeks who have been given Windows apps from their well-meaning but non-techno savvy relatives who have little or no idea about the differences between Linux and Windows. So they return "Pokemon Print Studio" and "Tomb Raider: The Implants Are Leaking*", or pull out gift certificate from other relative who realized they didn't know what to get, and what can they buy, but Quake III.

      Heck, a bunch of geeks will return stuff they *can* use, just to get Quake 3...

      ---
      * Other possible tag lines: "It's Just a Padded Bra", "The Lawsuit Against Dow Corning", and no doubt many more...

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    2. Re:Bad Timing? by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      Maybe not. If you're tired of being good; the Xmas music had really been getting to you to the point that you want to take aim at Rudolph; or the thought of mobs in malls just makes you want to scream...

      ...go and relieve some stress. Heh. :)

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    3. Re:Bad Timing? by georgeha · · Score: 2

      Is it just me or is this the single worst day of the year to release a product?

      It's you.

      The stores will be crowded, full of people returning/exchanging stuff, pockets full of Christmas money, and there, there, in a shining new heap, Quake III for Linux!

      Yeah, honey, wait in line, I'll just go to the 'warez store.

      George

    4. Re:Bad Timing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wonder in EToys will carry?? no flames please. cpetks

  10. Wow by Kwikymart · · Score: 1

    This is interesting to finally find out when quake3 linux will come out. Too bad I cannot even play the demo. All my opengl games run super slow, like 3 frames a minute (quake3 demo, wolfgl) with my voodoo 2 8 MB and MesaGL. does anyone know what my problem is or how to fix it???

    --

    Buying a Dell computer is equivalent to dropping the soap in a prison shower.
    1. Re:Wow by MichaelKVance · · Score: 1

      Have you recompiled Mesa for you Voodoo2? Have you done a:

      export MESA_GLX_FX="fullscreen" to enable hardware acceleration after you build the 3Dfx Mesa?

      Etc.,

      m.

      --
      "Sebastian you're in a mess. They called you King of all the Hipsters, is it true or are you still the Queen?" -- B
    2. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a Dreamcast. 60 fps on games like Soul Calibur which will probably blow Q3 away. NFL Y2K is awesome too.

    3. Re:Wow by dangermouse · · Score: 1

      Riiiiight. Let's see your Dreamcast compete with a TNT2. Let's see your Dreamcast connect to a master server, snag a list of ongoing games, and let you connect to one of them. Let's see you play Q3:A with a joypad and actually score some frags.

      Blow the Dreamcast. Blow it right into a ditch.

      That said, console games *are* cool (mmm... Soul Blade), and I'll jump to fork over my cash for a PS2.

    4. Re:Wow by Star+Traveller · · Score: 1
      The speed is very peculiar.
      Do you have the Voodoo GL driver?
      Go to www.3dfxgamers.com to get it

      --
      -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS/M/Sd?s-:a---->?c++UL+++P++++L++++ E+++W+++N+K-w---M-PSY+t+5?XtvbDI++
    5. Re:Wow by larz · · Score: 1

      you can't get 60 fps displaying to a television screen...the NTSC standard in north america is fixed at ~29.7 fps and the PAL standard in europe is 25 fps. Until game consoles display to htdvs, they won't be able to compete with the frame rate of 3d accelerated computer games.

    6. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quake3 test, Unreal Tournament Demo and Myth II all run just fine on my Voodoo2. You did install the glide drivers and the glide version of Mesa/GL didn't you?

    7. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a lie. 60 fps has nothing to do with NTSC. It has to do with how fast the computer puts pixels on the damn screen. DOn't confuse the refresh rate with the issue. As usual, another sutpid fucking slashdotter talking out of his ass.

    8. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dreamcast = $200 PC = $1000 3d Card = $100 Sound Card = $50 Where do you want to go tomorrow?

    9. Re:Wow by CrosseyedPainless · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are.

      1) S-T-U-P-I-D Spelling is fun!
      2) If the video card's refresh rate is higher than the screen's refresh rate, how do you expect to see it?

      Bye, idiot!

    10. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You stupid motherfucker. Dreamcast can be used with computer monitors. The dumb fuck who tried to obfuscate the issue of Dreamcast's superiority by throwing in this garbage about NTSC is talking about apples and oranges. Dreamcasts hardward is not to be fucked with. Can you say 1.4 Gigaflops, you fucking retard? It blows away those stupid fucking pc games.

    11. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PC lets you make money among other things, I hardly see what else you can do with Dreamcast beyond wasting your time playing games. El cheapo present for kids though.

    12. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I didn't say PC's were worthless. They're just worthless as a gaming machine. If you want to do something productive, get a pc. If you want to play games, get a console, you dumb fuck.

    13. Re:Wow by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      No one with a gamepad will ever be able to stop the Mouse+Kbd (Or in my case, ergonomic Cyberman 2 pad) fraggers. I know because I tried. I am actually using only the buttons on the Cyberman with my left hand, and my right hand on the 3 button mouse. It works perfectly, and no hand cramps.>:)
      Dreamcast is all good for fighting games like Soul Caliber (Bought DC and SC at once, MMMmmm!), but for FPSs and strategy games like Civ, or Warcraft you just can't beat the mouse. Of course, when the DC mouse and Kbd get popular over here... Well... Who needs a PC? >:)

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    14. Re:Wow by Rix · · Score: 1

      Someone's just a little too emotional over thier gaming platform.

      Lets review, even if the Dreamcast is faster than the TNT2 or the Voodoo3 (which I highly doubt), it won't be faster than the Geoforce or Voodoo4. So which does it make more sense to buy a Dreamcast, or a better video card?
      Cheers,

      Rick Kirkland

  11. But then I to wait! by SyniK · · Score: 1

    Dec 27th..... I can't wait that long! I want to support Linux games, but I want to play them now. Is anyone else considering purchasing the Windows version and then the Linux version? Or would that still not help the Linux cause because it will inflat the windows amount being bought?
    BTW Unreal Tournament rocks some serious nads... It will give Quake3Arena a run for it's money.

    --
    -Tom
    1. Re:But then I to wait! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Head over to this page and check out the preorder deal... You get the cd shipped to you FedEX 2day when Loki recieves the master from id. Which should be like a day or so after the Windows version ships. Then when Loki is ready to release the Linux version (Dec. 27) you'll get the box and shit mailed to you.

      sf

    2. Re:But then I to wait! by ricotj · · Score: 1

      I'm buying both; it sucks that I have to pay for it twice. But I can always make a gift of the windoze version once I get my linux version.

      --
      Trevor Taylor -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS/M d+@ s+: a?(---) C+++(++) UL++(+++)>++++ P+>+++ L
    3. Re:But then I to wait! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sorry to argue but UT is gonna make Q3 look stupid, like black and white, slow cartoony with poor AI and worse speech...GET UT IT ROCKS the black socks and pocket protector of a tired old Q3...i could not tell Q3 from Q2...very tired game :(

    4. Re:But then I to wait! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Quake3Arena demo was terrible! Unreal Tournament is fucking amazing. Forget Quake. It sucks (always has).

  12. I love LokiSoft... by pb · · Score: 1

    Civ:CTP, Heroes III, Q3A... Ahh, heaven.

    Now if only I could get Ultima IX, Final Fantasy VIII, anything else with cool roman numerals, or Gauntlet: Legends, along with a kickass box to play them on...

    Incidentally, if they keep this up, maybe this will become standard. Loki seems to port games very quickly, and if the games used SDL in the first place, it'd be even quicker...

    (of course Quake is the exception, id has always written games with cross-platform support in mind. Amazing, really.)
    ---
    pb Reply or e-mail rather than vaguely moderate.

    --
    pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
    1. Re:I love LokiSoft... by drig · · Score: 1

      Civ II:CTP, Heroes III, Q3A... Ahh, heaven.

      Now if only I could get Ultima IX, Final Fantasy VIII, anything else with cool roman numerals,


      Heh. That has been a weird trend @ Loki. I wonder if they'll ever release a 1st edition game :)

      I think Loki had a great idea for a company and are pulling it off beautifully. I just wonder what their revenue is like. Is this stuff selling well?

      -Dave

      pb Reply rather than vaguely moderate me.
      I don't think this'll work. Moderators aren't supposed to post. Also, when I'm moderator, I mark someone else up or down so that other people will see it or pass it by, not to inform the poster. It's the non-moderator's job to reply with comments.

      --
      Citizens Against Plate Tectonics
  13. Shipping Info by MichaelKVance · · Score: 5

    The game will be in *stores* on the 27th, but we're shipping CDs as soon as we possibly can, by 2nd day Fed-Ex. You'll get your box later. See

    http://quake3.lokigames.com/ship.html

    m.
    Programmer, Loki Entertainment

    --
    "Sebastian you're in a mess. They called you King of all the Hipsters, is it true or are you still the Queen?" -- B
    1. Re:Shipping Info by latneM · · Score: 2
      From id's Graeme Devine:
      software piracy has become such a serious issue that we need to use schemes such as CD keys to protect our future sales.
      and from the above mentioned page:
      Pre-orders placed on Loki's website will be shipped in two parts. The Quake III CDROM will be shipped via FedEx 2-day delivery beginning 3 days after we receive the Gold Master from id. The tin box, jewel case, manual and other packaging materials will be sent later via parcel post. We hope in this way to get Linux users playing Quake III immediately, without delays for packaging, assembly and stocking retail shelves.
      At least in the case of Half-Life, the CD Key was on the jewel case. Anyone seen the Q3 stuff yet & see where they put it? Oh what kind of hell it would be to have the disk in hand, and no key.
    2. Re:Shipping Info by MichaelKVance · · Score: 1

      I just asked Scott (CEO) about this. He says that we're shipping just the CD to you, but that we are printing the CD key on a label that is affixed to the CD mailer. In order to avoid sending you a mixed CD key on the jewel case/packaging/whatever we'll set aside the boxes for pre-orders and then handle them specially.

      Hope this answers your question.

      m.
      Programmer, Loki Entertainment

      --
      "Sebastian you're in a mess. They called you King of all the Hipsters, is it true or are you still the Queen?" -- B
    3. Re:Shipping Info by GrandGranini · · Score: 0

      Thanks guys. I read this, went to Loki's web site and bought the game. Can't wait for the tin box though. Must be a fetish thing.



      --
      It's almost impossible to have a baseless snobbish opinion of the General Theory of Relativity.
    4. Re:Shipping Info by SyniK · · Score: 1

      I'd love to go to lokigames and get in on the preorder... but I can't seem to get to anything in the *.lokigames.com domain. Did DNS change recently?


      http://209.223.115.151/ doesn't work
      neither does
      http://63.80.144.66/ :(


      Any more IPs to try?

      --
      -Tom
    5. Re:Shipping Info by MichaelKVance · · Score: 1

      63.80.144.66

      is the IP of the web server. I don't know why you can't view it, though. The DNS changed about 4 weeks ago, so it should have propagated. You can email info@lokigames.com to get in touch with someone who can take your order over email.

      m.
      Programmer, Loki Entertainment

      --
      "Sebastian you're in a mess. They called you King of all the Hipsters, is it true or are you still the Queen?" -- B
    6. Re:Shipping Info by Lagged2Death · · Score: 1

      From id's Graeme Devine:

      software piracy has become such a serious issue that we need to use schemes such as CD keys to protect our future sales.


      I'm all for anything that keeps id software around, but what protection does a CD key really give you, anyway?

    7. Re:Shipping Info by SyniK · · Score: 1

      I went to work and placed my order from there :).
      For some reason my DSL refused to connect to 63.80.144.66. But everwhere else I try it works fine :(.
      It must not have been a DNS problem because it did resolve, but just never got a response.
      Did I got banned from lokigames.com for some ping flood I don't remember? ;)
      Thanks for your help Michael and keep on hackin' on those Linux games!

      --
      -Tom
  14. Q3A Distribution by golliher · · Score: 2

    Can we expect to see better distribution to brick and mortar stores
    for Quake 3 Arena than we have for previous Loki games?

    I've picked up CTP, MythII and RT2 directly from Loki at tradeshows
    because they simply can't be found on the shelves. I'm very happy
    with the work Loki is doing to make games available on Linux, but
    distribution has always seemed the weak link. In my area I'd
    expect to see the games at Electronic Boutique and Best Buy at a minimum,
    but hopefully also at WalMart, Target, Sams Club, etc. This is a
    college town with a very active LUG.. it is a shame that Linux
    titles aren't available in the stores.

    I was hoping that with the release of Q3A for Linux that we'd see
    wide distribution, but with the announcement that Loki is going to
    distribute it I'm less than encouraged. Hopefully, Loki is planning
    something special for Q3A distribution..

    1. Re:Q3A Distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought Q2 at CompUsa. Their Linux section is growing every day.

    2. Re:Q3A Distribution by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      I'll take uga.edu to be Georgia...If you were out here on the west coast, Fry's seems to have all the Loki games in the Linux/Be section of the store.

      At least they do at the Wilsonville OR store. It's at the front of the software section, right where Macintosh stuff was before Apple got off lifesupport and started walking around again.

    3. Re:Q3A Distribution by Joe+Rumsey · · Score: 1

      I've seen Call to Power in CompUSA and Railroad Tycoon II in Fry's. In both cases, they were just lumped in with all the windows games, but they were there.

    4. Re:Q3A Distribution by golliher · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm in Georgia.. Athens, Ga to be specific and while I don't doubt that CompUSA in Atlanta might very well have Loki games.. you won't find any of them here. You *will* (I hazzard to guess) find Q3A for Windows at every store that sells any soft of software.. Walmart, Target, Hi-Fi Buys (sorry I know some of these are regional), K-mart, etc.. It would be nice if Linux software was as well distributed as Windows software.. even for one title.. I thought Quake 3 Arena would be that title...now I'm not so sure. :(

    5. Re:Q3A Distribution by xthulhu · · Score: 1

      Electronic Boutique Carries a wide variety of Linux products including Distrobutions, Games, and Apps. At one local store I found over 15 different Linux products...

  15. To gauge the Linux market by Alan+Shutko · · Score: 2

    Check back through old slashdot articles. Not including it in the box was a plan to give specific numbers to Linux purchases, to try to convince other retailers and distributors to carry other Linux games. This was reported in great detail a couple weeks ago.

  16. Re:experiment [Next Lines] by Star+Traveller · · Score: 0
    The syslogs were hung by /proc with care
    In hopes that Torvalds would soon be there

    --
    -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS/M/Sd?s-:a---->?c++UL+++P++++L++++ E+++W+++N+K-w---M-PSY+t+5?XtvbDI++
  17. Re:experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's not, and say we did.

  18. Re:experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we please have the option of blocking out users? This guy is absolutely not funny, ever.

  19. Re:FIRST!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does this give us the right to flame you?

  20. Re:FIRST!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jesus christ man, lay of the jesus christ man what's he ever done to you what's he ever done to you?

  21. Re:FIRST!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is quite right, the quake 3 iso is appearing on w4rez d00dz sites today. Its too bad too because this game is really worth supporting due to its cross platform support angle, unlike the DrunkX games for MicroSoft. Exerpt(s?) from the w4rez nfo:

    ÚÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÚ Ù Quake 3 Arena (c) ID Software ÚÙ
    ÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÙÙ
    : Supplied by: xxxxxxxx
    : : Release Date: December 2 1999 :
    Cracked by: xxxxxxxx
    Game Type: FPS
    Packaged by: xxxxxxxx
    Image Format: BIN/CUE
    ÃÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ-----ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ ÃÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
    CDS: 1 Protection: Serial Check
    CD1 archives: 40 x 15 MB
    CD1: FLT-Q3.001 -> .040
    ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÙ
    System Requirements: Windows 95/98 Pentium 266 MHz, 32 MB RAM
    ÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ

    but check this lovely part out:

    Please note, when you are asked to enter a cd Key, enter anything or just Hit escape. While this game is INET play based, we have cracked this release so directplay (IP to IP) or Lan play works. If you want to play Online fully (on all servers) _you will need a valid key_ (like Half-life).

    good thing the w4rez d00dz wont be online with this masterpeice.

  22. Re:FIRST!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus Christ, man!

    I'm not bad! Flame me only if you are pure.

  23. Re:experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to agree with you on that. Signal 11 is a fucking retard. When he tries to be serious on issues he comes off as a fucking ignoramus too.


    Signal 11 <======== Poster Boy for Keeping Abortion alive

  24. Re:open source? free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah yeah. Frankly, id's model is Good Enough for me (at least for games).

  25. Re:FIRST!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    JESUS CHRIST MAN WE JUST ALL NEED TO RELAX!

    JESUS CHRIST MAN JESUS CHRIST MAN LEAVE JESUS CHRIST AND/ OR MAN ALONE MAN

  26. Bundles by Star+Traveller · · Score: 2
    Ok, we have seen almost every Linux book come with a CD containing Linux and this can be understood. But to have a game come with OS is preposterous, I don't know anybody who would have an empty computer, buy the game, install the OS included and then play the game.

    How about if we just integrate Quake III and all the other games into the Linux kernel.
    Aside from having to install a new OS/Kernel for every game, it should not be a problem.
    That would be something to see. In the kernel configuration program you have choices on File Systems, hardware, and games. Recompile the kernel to include Quake and Pacman.

    Well, those are my two cents (more than enough to get Linux)

    --
    -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS/M/Sd?s-:a---->?c++UL+++P++++L++++ E+++W+++N+K-w---M-PSY+t+5?XtvbDI++
    1. Re:Bundles by dangermouse · · Score: 1

      First, lose the bold. We would have seen your asinine comments anyway.

      Second, why not distribute an OS with the game? It's cheap, and Loki has a vested interest in propagating Linux. Seems reasonable to me.

    2. Re:Bundles by osu-neko · · Score: 2
      How about if we just integrate Quake III and all the other games into the Linux kernel.

      I don't know about taking that literally, but I remember the "good old days" when what you did to play a game was stick its disk in the drive and boot it. That's seriously not a bad idea. No worries about conflicts with other things installed on your system, no chewing up all your hard drive space, etc. The developer has complete control over the environment the game is running in.

      The downside? Well, you have to shutdown and reboot your system to play the game, which these days involves a lot more than simply hitting OpenApple-Control-Reset (or whatever three-finger salute you used back in the days of bootable games). The plethora of hardware available must all be supported on the disk, rather than relying on the user having drivers available.

      So there are tradeoffs to booting your own OS vs. using the users. Being a Unix nut these days, I'd rather not have to reboot. But the idea isn't as far fetched as you might think. I remember when all commercially available games came with their own OS...

      --

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    3. Re:Bundles by seaportcasino · · Score: 1

      First of all, what's up with the bold print. We understand that your "mad as hell and not going to take it anymore", but do you need to shout at us?

      Also, how in any way does this hurt Linux. It is just another distribution point for Linux. If a handful of users convert to Linux because it comes with quake III, then the trouble was well worth it.

      Maybe every game should come with it's own distribution. How cool would that be? Why not I mean, how does it hurt anything? How funny would it be if Microsoft included Windows with every program they sold? At least you would never lose a copy!

    4. Re:Bundles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Distributing the operating system with each game is exactly how the Dreamcast operates, so Microsoft is already doing this to some degree.
      Of course, there are few, if any, Windows CE (Powered?!?) Dreamcast games so far.

    5. Re:Bundles by Kool+Moe · · Score: 1

      I'm one.
      I'm a Win98 user pretty much. I'd love to try Linux, but just don't have the time yet. If I get OpenLinux (Caldera) for Xmas, then I'll make the time.
      I have an old P66 sitting in the corner, perfectly functional (well, needs some parts) waiting to try Linux. If I don't get Caldera's distro for Xmas, I'll be buying the Q3/SuSE distro the next day!
      I think it's a great idea (though I wish they would release the Win32 and Linux on same CD. Then when you send in the registration card, you could mark off which OS you're using). Duh?

      --
      Kinda like Moe, but just a little more Kool
    6. Re:Bundles by cutevoice · · Score: 1

      It's a good idea, but it only works if the machines playing the games have a narrow range of hardware. Imagine writing all the drivers for the so many soundcards and video cards in the market. It'd be all like DOS games all over again. (select your soundcard: Adlib, Sound Blaster, SoundBlaster Pro, PC Speaker). What might work is booting a game-specific Linux. That way, we can simply use the existing modules to support the hardware.

  27. Re:FIRST!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus Christ, man! You forgot to say I'm not bad. But thanks for trying to get these guys to lay off me. You're not bad!

  28. Re:open source? free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OH give me a freakin' break.

    Why is it that there is now a peanut gallery that just HAS to cry foul every time something is released non-GPL? Chripes.

    Stuff your principles. Not everything needs to be open sourced and free.

  29. Did MS see this coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A few days ago on the Register it mentioned that MS are dropping OGL support in W2K, and also mentioned that Quake is overrated (sic).

    1. Re:Did MS see this coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they just played the game...you should too before spending money on it..LOKI is doing great work but if you start with a DOG game you GET a DOG PORT......

    2. Re:Did MS see this coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This isn't quite true. The Register, as it often does, misreported on the side of sensationalism. Microsoft didn't drop OpenGL support, they just dont have specific OpenGL drivers for different cards on the Windows 2000 release disk. They also don't have specific Direct3D drivers for many cards either... Its more of a technical/distribution problem than dropping support for OpenGL.

      Even if Microsoft does drop OpenGL support, I'm sure the ARB will quickly reestablish a standard OPENGL32.DLL-style ICD system (hopefully, after voting Microsoft off the ARB) backed by NVidia, SGI, etc. And Microsoft would be crazy to "break" the API in the future, as they have done with others in the past, with all the anti-trust scrutiny.

    3. Re:Did MS see this coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS isn't dropping OGL support in W2K tard.

  30. What I'd like to see... by bjb · · Score: 5
    What I would like to see is the Linux version of Quake III released on a bootable CD which would detect your configuration and just 'run'. You know, that ancient concept which goes back to the Apple ][ days when you'd just stick a disk in the drive, turn on the machine and the program would just load and run automatically? I think it's certainly feasible, as long as there is at least 100MB available on the CD.

    Of course, you'd also have to be able to run it from your booted system, but it would be a very cool thing (and powerful message?) if the most popular game of 2000 was just boot-and-run, and was powered by Linux.

    --

    --
    Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
    1. Re:What I'd like to see... by Black+Art · · Score: 3

      I think the problem with that is the limitations of bootable CDs. You are limited (incredibly) on the size of your boot image. (The size is about that of a standard floppy.) It can be done, but getting a tight enough kernel to recognise everything is a big pain. Video card and monitor support is still a big problem.

      It would make it simpler that the current installs, but it would also be very slow. Hard drives are faster than cd-roms and most games require alot of data from the drive. Running everything off the rom is going to slow things WAY down.

      Besides, if you have everything based off the cd-rom, where are you going to save your games?

      --
      "Trademarks are the heraldry of the new feudalism."
    2. Re:What I'd like to see... by Idaho · · Score: 1

      This is not a real problem. AFAIK, it is possible to mount the CDROM as /.
      So, you can create a tiny kernel, then mount /, then add any kernel modules you might want to load (e.g. network, sound and other drivers).

      Might give some problems with SCSI CD-ROMS tough...

      --
      Every expression is true, for a given value of 'true'
    3. Re:What I'd like to see... by HitchHik · · Score: 1

      I don't want to reboot just to play a game of quake.
      Plus I also want my web & ftp servers to keep running. I think linux users are used to keep their mashines up 24 hours anyway :)
      So what I'd like to see. Is a game that can be "auto run" from a CD under linux, but does not replace your currently running system.
      Btw. q3test ran ok on my dual P166MMX+Voodoo2system - but q3demotest is segfaulting :(((((((((((

      --
      -- &&
    4. Re:What I'd like to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know. I have had the exact same idea.
      Your idea has been validated.
      Have a nice day.

    5. Re:What I'd like to see... by Wolfier · · Score: 1

      I don't mind game CDs that don't boot. What I mind is games that actually gobble tens or even hundreds of your hard drive space.

      In my opinion, what games should store on your hard drive are:

      1. Configurations, if they can't be probed everytime the program is started.

      2. Save-game information.

      Shouldn't take anything more than 64KB, should it?
      I mean, even consoles can do that. They don't have any harddrives!! Plus, today's PCs have enough RAM to store everything you'd like to put on a hard disk for a game.

      Frankly, I don't mind waiting for a few seconds for the CD to load everytime, given the current CD drive speeds. What I mind is the 200MB hard drive space that is storing crap.

    6. Re:What I'd like to see... by Yarn · · Score: 2

      The El Torito format allows for many different booting methods.

      The most commonly used is where the bios treats an area of the CD as a floppy disk. Therefore it has to be 360k/720k/1.2M/1.44M/2.88M.

      It is also possible to have it appear as a hard disk image, but I've never seen this.

      --
      -Yarn - Rio Karma: Excellent
  31. Quake 3 A for Windows is on the shelves now by webslacker · · Score: 1

    Just FYI: http://www.quake3arena.com/news/index.html

    Now if only they'd announce when the Mac version is coming...

  32. Re:experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you guys don't fuck ryhme

  33. Sorry Santa by ch-chuck · · Score: 3

    but I'm postponing Christmas 2 days :))

    Chuck

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  34. Re:experiment by Signal+11 · · Score: 0

    Oh for christ's sake, this is offtopic?! It's about *Quake*! I'm trying to have alittle fun here, and it gets -1'd? Jeez....

  35. Re:FIRST!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    JeZuZ K-RiST MaN OWNz j00!!!

  36. Re:FIRST!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shit, that is just a minor set back, I will either get pure or a new plan, and then Jesus Christ Man shalt be my deamcast! :)

  37. Re:FIRST!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus Christ, man! Jesus Christ Man cannot be stopped! He's unstoppable! He's not bad! Lay off him! No moderator can stop Jesus Christ Man from his reign of TERROR!!!!

  38. Re:FIRST!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus Christ, man! Lay off the moderators!

    What'd they ever do to you? They're not bad!

  39. Heralds by Star+Traveller · · Score: 2
    Loki and ID Software will be the leaders of other game companies, being the first to have an awakening.
    If they do well through this, than many other games will be available.
    But if they do poorly, than it will be put back a couple of years.
    I myself want games for Linux, I am tired of just playing with linux/fs/coda/upcall.c

    Loki Loki ra ra ra!

    --
    -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS/M/Sd?s-:a---->?c++UL+++P++++L++++ E+++W+++N+K-w---M-PSY+t+5?XtvbDI++
  40. Bundled with SuSE? by DiningPhilosopher · · Score: 2

    Am I the only one who thinks this is bizarre?

    I don't really see the rationale... Could they really think that somebody who doesn't have Linux will buy the Linux version of a game and install the O.S. to play it?

    I don't know about other retailers, but at Fry's the Linux games are in the operating systems section, right next to the Linux distributions. There's no way you'd find them unless you specifically went looking for the Linux version.

    Also, I hope they're not expressing a bias toward a particular Linux distribution... That seems like a really bad idea to me. (If I call tech support with problems and they tell me I really should be using SuSE, I'll have some strong words for them)

    --
    /* The beatings will continue until morale improves. */
    1. Re:Bundled with SuSE? by marnerd · · Score: 2
      I suspect it is a two-fold thing: customer support and marketing.

      Only fairly recent XFree86 and LibC releases work reliably with some of the fancy mouse and video stuff they are doing. When a user calls tech support, and they have to say "you will need to upgrade to a later XFree86/LibC/whatever", at least they will also be able to say "and we included one in the box."

      It's common practice to throw a fairly useless freebie in with another product for marketing reasons. Have you never bought a game and found an AOL or CompuServe disk in there? Hell, DataComm warehouse throws an AOL CD in the box with every purchase. ("Hmm, he is buying some Cat 5 cable, a crimper and a 16-port hub... I'll bet he needs an AOL disk!")

      At least I can give teh SuSE disk away to either a newbie who needs a Linux distribution or a buddy who uses SuSE but hasn't yet got 6.3. I've yet to find anything useful to do with Yet Another AOL CD besides using it as a coaster or putting it in the microwave.

      --
      Not so much a sig as a lack of one.
    2. Re:Bundled with SuSE? by passion · · Score: 1

      on the other hand, if they choose to bundle a distribution w/ the game - how do you choose which one to include? RedHat? Would that be sending a monopoly message?

      I think it's a great idea. Just as AOL distributed IE (blecchh) it still got the binaries out into the hands of the people.

      --
      - passion
    3. Re:Bundled with SuSE? by Jorge+Nighthawk · · Score: 1
      Well, having never used linux before, and cringing at the idea of paying $60+ for RH at Best Buy, and wanting to buy Q3A, I think that this a great solution... I will definitely get this game/OS combo and try linux Q3A for myself...

      However, will they release windows binaries for d/l? In that case that they dont, the purchase of this bundle becomes a much more difficult choice...

    4. Re:Bundled with SuSE? by Wah · · Score: 1

      The above post is why they are bundled together. A good idea, IMHO.


      --
      +&x
    5. Re:Bundled with SuSE? by msphil · · Score: 1

      Ah, but they're also selling Debian separately ($19.95). Loki has, in the past, taken a distribution-neutral stance, and I expect this to continue. More likely, SuSE worked out some sort of deal to get SuSE in front of more Linux people in North America.

      --
      This .sig intentionally left blank.
    6. Re:Bundled with SuSE? by RelliK · · Score: 2
      It's common practice to throw a fairly useless freebie in with another product for marketing reasons.

      Only problem is that SuSE is far from being freebie

      --
      ___
      If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
    7. Re:Bundled with SuSE? by Harlequin · · Score: 1

      As stated in this previous /. article, all the binaries will eventually be available for download. Of course, you'll have to be willing to wait a few weeks till they're up. I'd encourage people to wait the couple weeks and buy the linux version. Q3 runs like crap on my p166 w/ voodoo2, and if it wasn't for the linux version, I probably wouldn't even buy it.

      BTW, I think including SUSE is a good idea, too. I'm currently running Red Hat, but I'm interested in seeing what SUSE's like. Maybe I'll just slap it onto another partition. I realize that you can go to Cheap Bytes and get a cheap distro cd, but this way I don't have to.

    8. Re:Bundled with SuSE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were handing plenty out a Comdex...

    9. Re:Bundled with SuSE? by litesgod · · Score: 1

      The first thing I thought when I heard this was how it might change the way linux is viewed by the masses. As it stands, Linux is still considered that weird, non-windows thing that only the real geeks use. If someone walks into a store and sees two versions of Quake3, one with an Operating System, and one without, I think they would be more inclinced to look at the one with. Besides, it makes Linux out to be a good gaming platform, which, of course, can't hurt things.

    10. Re:Bundled with SuSE? by Ignatius · · Score: 1

      Could they really think that somebody who doesn't have Linux will buy the Linux version of a game and install the O.S. to play it?

      This won't be necessary, since you can get the Windows binaries from the net. In fact, it's a perfect opportunity for anyone who wants to give Linux a try, as he will get an up-to-date distrib for free (not to speak of the cool tin case, which is supposed to be Linux-only), and still can play Quake under Windows should he be inclined to do so.

      Also, I hope they're not expressing a bias toward a particular Linux distribution.

      SuSE is Loki's retail-partner in Europe - my CivCTP version also came with a SuSE 6.1 CDROM. I don't think that id-software has much to do with this decision.

    11. Re:Bundled with SuSE? by Chuq · · Score: 1

      Very true. I recently got my old box (pentium 200) up and going and want to try to learn as many free OS's as possible with it. I already have Redhat 6.0, FreeBSD 3.3 and Corel Linux CD's. Why not SuSE as well? I love Q3 so heres a great opportunity to grab them both at once! :)

      --
      - Chuq
  41. Re:FIRST!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who said any thing about the moderators, Jesus Christ Man lay off the moderators and Jesus Christ Man, what'd they ever do to you? They're not bad! And for the last time, Jesus Christ, man Lay off me, what'd I ever do to you? I am not bad!

  42. JESUS H. Q. BLUDDY CHRIST MAN!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    JESUS H Q FLAMIN BLOODY CHRIST MAN, WHAT'S THE COBBER EVER DONE TO YOU MATE? THE CUNT'S NOT TOO BAD! TRUE BLUE YEAH?

    1. Re:JESUS H. Q. BLUDDY CHRIST MAN!! by Jesus+Christ+Man · · Score: 1

      Jesus Christ, man! What are you saying?

  43. Official demo out by bconway · · Score: 1

    The official Q3 demo for Windows is out, with Linux and Mac versions following shortly. Start your downloading!

    --
    Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru?
    1. Re:Official demo out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The official demo came out a few weeks ago. They just didn't have it for Linux.

  44. Re:FIRST!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus Christ, man wtf are you trying to say

  45. Re:FIRST!!! by Jesus+Christ+Man · · Score: 1

    Jesus Christ, man! Lay off me!

    I'm not bad!

  46. Executables by Lando · · Score: 1

    I have seen mention that id will release the Linux drivers for the game so that you can play on a linux box using your windows cd.

    My question... Are they going to release the windows exe files as well so that I can play on windows using my linux cd?

    Anyone seen anything about this?

    Lando

    --
    /* TODO: Spawn child process, interest child in technology, have child write a new sig */
    1. Re:Executables by bconway · · Score: 1

      They will be releasing updated executables of both so that CDs can swap for either OS as you have suggested. It will be a couple of months though, so support Linux today!

      --
      Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru?
  47. Why not joystick support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have looked at the Quake 3 Arena test for Linux, and noticed an option for joystick support...but it didn't actually work. I realize that a lot of Linux gamers prefer a mouse and a keyboard anyway, but I and several of the people I play Quake/Tribes/UT with would really prefer to use our Panther XLs. The group of people that did joystick support for Linux did an excellent job. The kernel supports just about every kind of oddball joystick that plugs into a standard game port... ...so when are the games going to start taking advantage of this?? I try to buy a copy of every major game released for Linux, but this lack of joystick support is really starting to get to me. I hate having to reboot into Windows to play a game, and then reboot it again and again...argh!

    1. Re:Why not joystick support? by hercules_at_loki · · Score: 1

      FYI, Joystick support is coming to SDL (http://www.devolution.com/~slouken/SDL/), the library we use with many of our games.

      This won't translate directly into joystick support for say, Civilization: Call To Power, but it will result in lots more SDL based Linux games having joystick support.

      --Sam

  48. Not a Linux user, but I've ordered it by Shadowlion · · Score: 4

    I don't run Linux, personally. I have various distributions (Debian, older Red Hats, older Slackware, even a .86 of Stampede), including a recently arrived version of Slackware 7, but Linux isn't installed on my system.

    So why did I order Quake III: Arena for Linux? To support the gaming market for alternative operating systems. That binaries for the other platforms exist will make the game moderately useful (assuming I want to plug in my Windows disk), but in the end I simply want to be counted as having acknowledged that a market exists for all alternative PC operating systems.

    If I can't stand with my platform of choice - BeOS - then I will stand with the people who are most likely to understand, if not respect, that choice.
    And I would rather have been recorded as having stood for the party I most believed, rather than not having participated at all.


  49. Re:FIRST!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    try to say Jesus Christ Man, shutup

  50. [Next Lines] by Dast · · Score: 2

    For those of us who can appreciate humor.

    [Bringing it back to Quake, which was Sig11's original intention anyway]

    The campers were dug in like Alabama ticks,
    And the HPB's were up to their usual tricks.
    The other gamers in 'doze-land , and I in my GNU,
    I can't get any Quake3, what am I to do?

    --

    This sig is false.

  51. Re:So which do /.'ers think is the best? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dreamcast, since PS2 won't be out until next fall.

  52. Video Card support? by swilly · · Score: 1


    This seems a good time to bring up something I've been wondering about. I know my old Matrox Millenium (w 2MB RAM!) couldn't handle Q3, so I plan on upgrading, but to what? TNT? Voodoo? Something else?

    What are the status of X support for newer 3D cards? Any dedicated servers? What about OpenGL/Mesa drivers?

    In short: What would be the ideal 3d card out there in regards to price/performance, X/Linux support, and gaming in general?

    --

    1. Re:Video Card support? by weisserw · · Score: 1

      A good 2D/3D card for Linux users is the Voodoo3 3000. It works in 3D in Linux and the X server is in the XFree86 3.3.5 SVGA driver. Regardless of what you may think of 3dfx or their cards, the voodoo3 is still very fast. A TNT2 Ultra of course is faster and does 32 bit color, but you'd have to wait to get good 3D performance in Linux.

      -W.W.

      --
      "Well it should be obvious to even the most dim-witted individual who holds an advanced degree in hyperbolic topology...
    2. Re:Video Card support? by mohaine · · Score: 1

      My TNT with a Celeron 450 is JUST playable.
      FPS are pretty low, but I haven't tired turning down the Quality setting yet. It was easier just to reboot to Win98.

      I don't know where the bottle-neck is so a TNT2 might or might not help you.

      --
      (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    3. Re:Video Card support? by whoop · · Score: 1

      I got a TNT2u recently and tried a quake3 demo. The timed demo deal came up with a whopping 12 fps. Is that normal, or am I crazy? It was pretty with all the coloring and stuff, but come now. My old K6/300, Win95, Voodoo2 was doing a lot more. It doesn't have to be 500 fps like everything in the game magazines are, just a little closer. :)

    4. Re:Video Card support? by VinceJH · · Score: 1

      Under Linux, yes, thats normal. With everything turned on, with my tnt on a p2-300, I get 10. Without lightmaps, I get 15fps.

      I am sure you have heard the reason for this, so if you want speed under linux, get a voodoo3 or g400.

      --
      I know I will be moderated down for this, but . . . Vincent
    5. Re:Video Card support? by RelliK · · Score: 1

      Yes, unfortunately, it's normal. The only 3d cards that have decent support uner Linux (not perfect though) are 3dfx ones. The answer I've been hearing so many times is "wait for XFree 4.0". It's supposed to be released some time in february.

      --
      ___
      If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
  53. fools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this game goes on sale next week at WALMART.COM

    (it's old news)

  54. What?! The Windows version is already available! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Windows version is in stores *NOW* While I'll still buy the Linux version it sucks to have to wait until Dec. 27.

  55. use windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, windows has optomized drivers for 3d hardware. If anyone can prove that linux runs quake faster with opengl then please supply the timedemo scores to back it up

    1. Re:use windows by Gonwin · · Score: 1
      Read the UTAH GLX mail archives.

      John Carmack himself has posted benchmarks of Quake running faster on Linux than Windows for the same machine.

      ---

      --

      ---

    2. Re:use windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quake3 is not *faster* than Win9x, but it's fast enough to be playable. At 800x600: Win98=54fps, Linux=41fps. I can live with 41 frames per second. RedHat v6.0, Linux kernel v2.2.13, XFree86 v3.3.5, Pentium III/550, SLI V2, 256MB RAM.

    3. Re:use windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Matrox G200, and thanks to the Utah GLX project the Linux demo version of Q3 smokes the Windows version. Part of that is because the Win OpenGL drivers from Matrox suck shit, but hey ... consider this another victory for open source.

  56. Sucking up moderation points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it sad that over the past week a lot of people have taken to dumping anonymous coward crap over Slashdot. Anonymous Cowards are an important part of Slashdot, they allow people to post stuff without being traced back, this is great if used correctly, but when used incorrectly, as has been done this week by those we all know and love, has caused great strife.

    There are solutions to this though:

    • Don't reply to the posters that write crap.
      • Unfortunately, they can collude and create a massive thread by themselves and we can't control it. Or they post absolutely huge messages... The moderators can't keep up and there aren't enough moderation points. Solution: give moderators unlimited -1 points to solve this, and allow posts to be moderated down to -2 (takes two mismoderations to kill a valid anon coward post).
    • To prevent 1st posts: When a new story is first posted, only allow those with high karma to see it and comment on it until there are 3 threads. Thus first posts will never happen, as there will be no chance of it happening.
      • Of course, nth posts will still happen, and people will still abuse the system
    • Allow over-lord moderation: cancel messages that are really bad and offtopic.
      • "Freedom of Speech"

    Not wanting to agravate the discussion further though.

    On Topic: I can't wait for Xfree version 4 to be released, so that games can be catered for even better!

    1. Re:Sucking up moderation points by Jesus+Christ+Man · · Score: 1

      Jesus Christ, man!

      In an attempt to appease you, I have created a user account. So no more Anonymous Coward from Jesus Christ Man.

      So lay off me! I'm not bad!

    2. Re:Sucking up moderation points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hrm...I don't post here much anymore so I'm posting as a Coward (it isn't worth the bother to me to create a user account that I will use only a few times a year). However, another Anonymous Coward sayeth:
      >To prevent 1st posts: When a new story is first posted,
      >only allow those with high karma to see it and comment
      >on it until there are 3 threads. Thus first posts
      >will never happen, as there will be no chance of it happening.

      So what you are saying is that only those who are moderators (moderators are the only people with karma, right?) can reply to a post until there are 3 threads? Where is the equality in that? After all, if Anon Cowards start moderated at 0 by default, and most users set their thresholds to 1 to avoid most Cowards, what changes? I fail to see what that suggestion adds to what Taco has already implemented...But then I just took a test and my brain is still fried :(

    3. Re:Sucking up moderation points by j+a+w+a+d · · Score: 1
      Discuss moderation here.

      That way you don't get moderated down as off-topic, too.

      i dont display scores, and my threshhold is -1. post accordingly.

      --
      i dont display scores, and my threshhold is -1. post accordingly.
      Discuss /. policies
  57. Re:FIRST!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Expect a key generator to handle this problem within the next week or 2.

  58. A really good way to track Linux sales! by 1010011010 · · Score: 2

    For companies that don't want to track, or bother with, Linux sales, Loki seems to be invaluable. They can still sell the product to the Linux market, while not distracting themselves from their "core market." And get accurate numbers for the Linux sales. The other methods Carmack suggested using -- letting Linux users download the game binaries and the use a Windows CD, or including Linux binaries in the Windows box -- obscures the true value of the Linux market.

    Yay, ID! Yay, Loki!

    --
    Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
  59. CD Key Warning by Evangelion · · Score: 4


    From Here:


    On another note, I thought it important to address a security issue with your
    Quake 3 config files for the commercial release.

    When you enter your CD Key, we store it in q3config.cfg in the cl_cdkey cvar.
    Unencrypted. Please treat your retail config files as you would the alarm code
    to your house, or the PIN number on your bank card. If you must send your configs
    to someone, please make sure to edit out the "set cl_cdkey xxx..." line.

    It was brought to my attention that there was a scam with Half-Life CD Keys a
    while back where people were asked to e-mail their configs to HLSupport@hotmail.com
    or something to that effect, and I'd hate to see an innocent customer unknowingly
    succumb to a similar scam with Q3A.

    Cheers,

    -Xian

    1. Re:CD Key Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm sure we'll have a key generator available to us soon enough anyway.

    2. Re:CD Key Warning by Nodatadj · · Score: 2

      That Novell guy will have to be careful :)

  60. SuSE 6.3 included by z84976 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that's nice and all, including SuSE 6.3. Just wish I'd known that 3 days ago when I ordered 6.3 by itself... such is the nature of my life.

    1. Re:SuSE 6.3 included by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't worry about it. Chances are it's not the full 5-6 disk version with the extra commercial software. Most likely it's the single disk freeware version.

  61. Near Simultaneous release?! by golliher · · Score: 1

    Does anybody besides me feel icky to read "near simultaneous release" from Loki? In the world of gaming a difference of 20-30 days seems like an eternity.. all your friends running Windows have had (and mastered) a game by the time the "near simultaneous release" is available for Linux. I can't wait for the days of *real* simultaneous release... at least progress is being made and Loki deserves the credit for making it with Linux games. I'm just impatient dammit.

    1. Re:Near Simultaneous release?! by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Your point about having friends 'mastering' a game by the time you finally get it is unfounded. We've all been playing Q3Test all this time so it's not like a brand new game is bursting out on the scene.
      Id should have shown some love and made people wait until ALL the versions were ready for a TRUE simultaneous release. Wasn't that their intention from the start? Maybe UT is bigger competition than they anticipated... and I saw it on the shelf today.

    2. Re:Near Simultaneous release?! by mlc · · Score: 1
      Id should have shown some love and made people wait until ALL the versions were ready for a TRUE simultaneous release.

      What, and missed the almight Christmas retail season? I don't think that's gonna happen.

    3. Re:Near Simultaneous release?! by hercules_at_loki · · Score: 1

      We will actually be shipping Linux Q3A disks to pre-order customers very close to the date the Windows game will hit the shelves.

      Here's the skinny from PlanetQuake:

      http://www.planetquake.com/news/newsbytime.shtml #PQN53380


      12.3.1999 | 6:45 General Quake III Arena News
      Linux Preorders for Quake III - by Pappy-R

      You don't have to wait till after Christmas for your copy of Quake III for
      Linux. Preorder at Loki Entertainment and they'll ship you the Linux CD as
      soon as it's out and then the Tin box and goodies later at no extra charge.
      Now that IS Linux lovin'. Thnx Rob for the nudge.

  62. Repetition within FPS... by SimplyCosmic · · Score: 1

    I agree that there has been too much repetition within the previous generation of first person shooters, however I believe this has as much to do with the players as the developers. A prime example is Tribes, a wonderful team based multiplayer game. What annoys me however, is the amount of servers playing the same original maps over and over. Yes, there have been almost as many new and creative maps created for Tribes as other FPS out there, but in general there are two many players who only want the maps they know only too well, and balk at trying new areas. For myself, playing on new maps is a wonderful experience. The exploration of a strange area, combined with the fact that others won't have as great an advantage in knowing the map completely, makes for some intense online experiences. I personally go through the list of Unreal servers looking for maps I've never played before. Finally, as for the gameplay itself, take a look at the new game types for Unreal Tournament. Whether you like the engine or not, games like Assault add new spice to the online mix.

    1. Re:Repetition within FPS... by DaveHowe · · Score: 2

      Hmm. a lot of the problem is familarity - a person that knows a map well will do much better than someone who hasn't seen it. While variety is good, a new map really means downloading it, going offline and doing serious practice in the new level until you know your way around. A dedicated player would enjoy this, an average one probably just wants to get online and shooting, then wrap up for the day and do the same tomorrow :+)
      I *do* like Classic Doom and Doom2 though - mostly because I have enough low-spec machines to set up a lan game at home :+)
      --

      --
      -=DaveHowe=-
    2. Re:Repetition within FPS... by Supergrass · · Score: 1

      This is drifting off-topic, but most of the user-created maps/mods I've seen for Tribes have been terrible. Too unbalanced, or simply bizarre (the mod where you can carry a "camouflage" tree on your back comes to mind).

      People making maps for Tribes need to concentrate less on putting thousands of turrets on a map. (they also need to stop simply taking bases from stock maps and putting them on different maps)

      --
      Wherever there's a will, there's a motorway.
  63. Dec. 27? by passion · · Score: 1

    What? that only gives me 3-4 days to practice up for the real apocalypse...

    : )

    --
    - passion
  64. Re:experiment [Next Lines] by Star+Traveller · · Score: 0
    I sent this in.
    Why did someone make me lose my karma?
    It is the person who started this poem who may have swerved off-topic.

    Don't hate me because I'm different

    To do: Get better poetry

    --
    -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS/M/Sd?s-:a---->?c++UL+++P++++L++++ E+++W+++N+K-w---M-PSY+t+5?XtvbDI++
  65. Something to think about.... by finkployd · · Score: 1

    A good game and good Linux distro for under the price of RedHat 6.x....

    Something to think about Redhat...

    *note* I'm not bashing RH, they're my distro of choice :) Just an observation.

    Finkployd

    1. Re:Something to think about.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BugHat (or just about any other distro) is only ! 30 bux for the basic edition official version...

  66. Check the modules by toofast · · Score: 1

    Yes, the kernel does support most joysticks, but make sure it's either

    - compiled in the kernel or;
    - make sure you load the joystick modules

    Check /lib/modules/misc... Load away!

  67. Reply to windoze troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please go away. We don't want to have to reboot into windoze just to play a game. From recent reports of Q3a demo with the new Xfree 3.9 (built in OpenGL), there is no speed difference between windoze and Linux, so progress has been made. There goes the last reason to keep that old windoze partiton around!

  68. warezing Q3A = BAD idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As much as we all love warez, I STRONGLY suggest that you not warez quake 3, especially a version on an "alternative" OS like Linux or Mac OS. A lot of people are going to be watching the sales of q3a on those two platforms. If it sells well enough, it could mean many more games on Mac and linux. If everybody downloads the game from their friendly neighborhood warez site, you kill what everybody has been working so hard to achieve: more games for Mac OS and Linux. Companies know they can make money off a Win32 game, but mac os and linux are risky and "unprofitable" markets to them. The gamers of the world need to prove them wrong. The same thing goes for Unreal Tournament.

  69. SuSE and Games by larard · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that SuSE are getting involved in the Linux Gaming Scene heavily at the moment.

    6.3 comes with a demo of Civ CTP and Railroad Tycoon II, given the well roundedness of their ditro, might they not stand to gain from this state, and us all my the positive influence that this will have on the Linux Games market as a whole.

    Anyway getting a copy of YAST 2 alone would be nice ;-)


    Larard.

    1. Re:SuSE and Games by mha · · Score: 1

      YaST II is for the graphical installation only, so far. The regular system tool is still the old YaST - but with quite a few more options (like you ca configure LVM (logical volume manager), or a more powerful sendmail setup,...).


      --
      Michael Hasenstein
      http://www.csn.tu-chemnitz.de/~mha/

  70. Re:YES!!!! SCORE (0,Offtopic) HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    blah blah blah. You stupid bozo!

  71. hehe, moderation is funny....(ot) by Wah · · Score: 1

    ... this post started at a two and has since gone full circle..

    Moderation Totals:Offtopic=1, Insightful=1, Overrated=1, Underrated=1, Total=4.

    lol, someone needs to moderate it as funny and flamebait and then the bases will all be loaded but the score will stay the same.

    --
    +&x
  72. OT: Yet another game going Linux by TheFitz · · Score: 5

    Slashdot doesn't seem to want to run this story, so I'm going to point it out here. Tribes2 (being developed by Dynamix) is going to be ported to Linux. If you go to the URL here you will see that they have plans to make a Linux and Mac port and are looking for help on the sound systems for those platforms and such. I am a HUGe fan of Tribes and am EXTREMELY happy that Tribes2 is going to be on the Linux platform.

    --
    "Out, OUT! You demons of STUPIDITY!" - Dogbert
    1. Re:OT: Yet another game going Linux by Snflwer98 · · Score: 1

      Whoohoo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Tribes2 on Linux! I hate windows..and I will be a very happy Tribes player when I can have Linux running! I am Very glad that they decided to port it! Me

      --
      "I have lost my way in life, because I have lost my mind. I would go and search for it, but I'm afraid of what I'd find
    2. Re:OT: Yet another game going Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When Tribes 2 gets released for Linux I'm definately going to buy it. I think the game play in Tribes is way better then Quake. I think too many game companies spend too much time developing "killer graphics". Most of my favorite games don't have the best graphics but the game play is much more enjoyable.

  73. Bootable q3 cd would be cool... by obi · · Score: 1

    What would be cool would be to have a bootable CD that starts up Suse, auto probes for hardware, and runs Q3. I know that auto probes for hardware may be a bit tricky, but people can always install it themselves if they want to play it from harddrive/have wacky hardware configurations. I thought about this before. You put games on CD's in any case. You can boot from CD's. Linux is free. Hardware support for Linux is excellent. Why not just boot and play from CD.

    1. Re:Bootable q3 cd would be cool... by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Note that if you assume a Windows system (I suppose you could have a way of checking), you could simply store whatever data you need somewhere on that partition regarding what hardware you have, etc. Heck, you could look at the Windows files and probably find out at least some of the hardware, and perhaps dial-up networking or TCP/IP settings. And lots of the hardware you don't care about (scanners and printers, for two).

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    2. Re:Bootable q3 cd would be cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, Macs can boot CDs and run the OS from CD

      Does that mean linux and friends are begind?

  74. Fine with me, but... by roystgnr · · Score: 4

    There's a lot of Linux/Windows dual booters out there who aren't willing to wait three more weeks to get the right version of the game. The number of purchases of the Linux version thus won't reflect the number of people who would prefer a Linux game to a Windows game, but will more closely reflect the number of people who wouldn't have bought Quake 3 at all if it hadn't had a Linux version.

    Which is what companies need to know to make their porting decisions, I guess... but it's still annoying to know that there's going to be some skewed, easily misinterpreted marketing data out there because of this.

  75. Re:open source? free? by SyniK · · Score: 1

    I'm with you in principle :), but I also want to support Linux games, so I'll buy the Linux version.
    If you want to remain principled just pirate it like everybody else...
    I'm not advocating piracy. I'm just advocating standing by your principles :).

    --
    -Tom
  76. "SuSe 6.3" by De · · Score: 1

    Exactly what do they mean by SuSe 6.3? The evaluation CD or all 6 cds? I would think the evaluation CD ....

    1. Re:"SuSe 6.3" by munson · · Score: 1

      Good question. if it had all 6 cd's id get it

  77. Q3...ho humm why bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    the graphics are cartoony, the sound is AWFUL, the actual same tired sounds from Quake, too bad we cannot talk LOKI into porting UNREAL TOURNAMENT now there is a multiplayer frag fest of the BEST KIND :) I predict Q3arena loses very badly to Unreal Tournament. Have got to say that since DOOM or the original HALFLIFE I have not had as much fun with a game as UT..it is well worth the $ for the retail version and the DEMO KICKs ASS...compare urselves between Q3test and UTdemo...there really is no comparison :)

    DOWN with the MAN...Whomever that is

    1. Re:Q3...ho humm why bother by chacal · · Score: 1

      umm, actually, Unreal Tournament is already out for Linux. you can download the free Linux demo: here. or, if you've already bought the game, you can get your linux binaries here And anyway, Loki's not porting Q3, they're simply distributing it. I have a feeling that they'll make out ok in this whole deal, fiscally, which is cool.

    2. Re:Q3...ho humm why bother by Rational · · Score: 1

      Besides, Unreal Tournament is just a pale imitation of Q3A... Q3A has the gameplay AND graphics edge. It is nice both are coming out for Linux, though, and I hope both sell well.

      --
      "Be nice, veer left, and never stop thinking" Iain Banks - Walking On Glass
  78. Mesa on non-hardware-accelerated computers by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 5

    Now that we're getting more OpenGL games than ever coming out for Linux, I think it might be a good time to address the problem of video card hardware support.

    Many of us don't have 3D accelerators that work under Linux. While I'd like to have my hardware working under Linux, I realize that it's probably not going to happen any time this millenium.

    So instead, I have a suggestion. Mesa currently has only one mode for software rendering--high quality. Is there any way that a low-quality software rendering mode could be introduced into Mesa? How difficult would it be to add this to the libraries, maybe have it switched on/off by an environment variable? How much of a slow-down would it introduce into the libraries, by having forked logic like this?

    Because honestly, if I were to buy a copy of Quake III right now, I'd have to buy the Windows version because I haven't the "right" hardware 3D-accelerator. A sped-up, but much less visually correct, version of Mesa might make it easier for someone like me to bite the bullet and buy the Linux version, so that when I upgrade/if I upgrade to a 3D accelerated card, I'll have it under the OS I prefer.

    (I realize this is pretty selfish, but it's also one of the reasons why you're not going to see many Windows users switching over to Linux any time soon. If I can't install Linux on someone else's 600Mhz Athalon, and be able to show them a kick-ass 3D game with a frame rate higher than 1.5/s...)


    James

    1. Re:Mesa on non-hardware-accelerated computers by franklamonica · · Score: 2

      James,
      The work Precision Insight Inc. (PI) is doing will provide the 3D hardware acceleration in an X Window that these games need for Linux. Check out 3dfxgamers.com under "drivers" to find the pre-release of our first DRI based Mesa driver. If you get to check it out, I'd appreciate your feedback on the frame rate that you get on your system. Three other drivers are scheduled to be released by PI before April of 2000. ATI has announced that one of the drivers will be for the Rage 128, the other two have not yet been announced. Both announced drivers will have full source code and will become part of XFree86 4.0. At least one of the other two will also have full source code.
      Frank

    2. Re:Mesa on non-hardware-accelerated computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By april even better hardware than GeForce will be around.

      I cannot wait.

    3. Re:Mesa on non-hardware-accelerated computers by MaufTarkie · · Score: 1

      Because honestly, if I were to buy a copy of Quake III right now, I'd have to buy the Windows version because I haven't the "right" hardware 3D-accelerator.

      Please consider buying the Linux version and then download the Wintel engine from the FTP server when it's released. This is what I'm going to do, even though my gfx card isn't supported under Linux (yet). I have no problem making my money vote for Linux even if I'm going to run it under Windows. Hopefully the distributors who do not believe alternative platforms exist will sit up and take notice.

      You do make a very valid point, though, about Mesa. I've got it compiled but I'm a bit miffed at how slow it is. I mean, come on! I have an Athlon 550 (and a PIII-450 at work). I feel like I'm running a 486/66 again. A lower-res "fast" mode would be great. I'd consider helping the project, but you haven't seen me try to program 3D software. Be afraid. Be very afraid.

      (other than that, I'm happy with Mesa. I just can't wait for a .so library for my video card)

      --
      Without you I'm one step closer to happiness without violence.
  79. Re:Already on warez sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there a Key generator for the game yet?

  80. Re:experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and you dont know how to spell which is worse, ASS ???

  81. 2 problems with this approach by RelliK · · Score: 1

    I hope Jon Carmack reads this.

    1. Availability. Most if not all retail stores will carry only win32 version. I already checked Future Shop -- you can preorder win32 version of Q3 but there's no mention of Linux or Mac versions.

    2. Price. It is *much* cheaper to buy the game in a store then to order it online. Future Shop sells it for $70 Cnd. Loki sells it for $50 US (approx $76 Cnd) + shipping and handling. If you include the s&h plus the tax they always charge on the border, the total comes to well over $90.

    Considering that with a cable modem you can download the Linux binaries in just a couple minutes, I'll most likely do just that. Unless the Linux version appears on the shelves.

    --
    ___
    If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
    1. Re:2 problems with this approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This seems just a bit shortsighted. There is a fully supported Linux retail product here. That is the sort of thing that we would like to encourage. We need to demonstrate our profitability to everyone else who makes games, and even to Id management. Buying a Win32 version won't do that. It will just get you counted with the Win32 crowd and help bolster it's cult of inevetability.

      It's ultimately not in your best interest to skimp on a few dollars now.

      Linux has reached the point where there really is no longer any point in supporting anything short of full vendor support, at least in as much as they will acknowledge us with their product.

      Thus, I am getting my copy of Unreal Tournament from Australia so that I can ensure that when I vote with my dollars it's for my chosen platform.

      I'll save being a tightwad for the day when there are baskets of ancient Linux games being closed out at 20bux a pop or less. For, that day is less likely to come if you allow yourself to be counted amongst the 'market leader' crowd.

  82. Good crack today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm....12-2-99 doesn't look like a few weeks ago. Try again?

  83. numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let the numbers speak for themselves. I don't want to hear "it just seems faster in linux"

  84. dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does quake2 get 65fps when my monitor refresh rate is set to 60? Explain that.

    1. Re:dumbass by Gregg+M · · Score: 1

      How does quake2 get 65fps when my monitor refresh rate is set to 60? Explain that.

      Most video cards and monitors refresh higher. 3dfx Voodoo 2 cards support four refresh rates: 60, 75, 85, and 120Hz. You then set to the highest refresh rate you can.

      --
      Linux is only free if your time has no value. Windows is only free if you threaten to use Linux.
  85. Re:Bundled with SuSE?, Yes they will. by greg · · Score: 1

    About half of all dedicated quake servers on the internet (many thousands) run Linux. Just in the past two weeks I have helped several people set up Linux systems in order run dedicated Quake or Half-Life servers. In any case the SuSE disks are free so who cares if they aren't needed.

    --

    I browse with my threshold at 2 so I can't read my own comments :-)

  86. Re:FIRST!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which site was this on? I was looking for it, but havent had any luck.

  87. YES . . . I agree with their rationale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have 3 friends (so far) that I have convinced to purchase the Linux copy of Q3A simply based on the fact that it also happens to have a copy of SuSE. These friends don't have Linux, and planned on purchasing Q3A anyway, and if they want they'll still be able to play it on a Win32 platform if they so choose (Carmack said the utility to convert from one version to another will be out shortly after X-Mas).

    These are friends who have read alot about Linux, but never had a real reason/excuse to take the time and see what it is all about. This is the perfect thing to get them to give Linux a closer look.

  88. Preordered and Waiting... by SEGV · · Score: 1

    I've preordered my copy and am awaiting its arrival. I'm happy to support Linux, id, and Loki.

    I hardly play games these days (too much else to do), only AoE 1&2, Starcraft, Quake 2&3, and Civ3.

    It's nice that for the latter two, I don't have to reboot. Quake isn't quite as playable as on Windows, but it *is* playable. Hopefully the coming RIVA TNT2 drivers, and XFree86 4.0, will bring things more in line.

    --

    --

    --
    Marc A. Lepage
    Software Developer
  89. Which cards are supported for Linux? by chirayu · · Score: 1

    I havent been able to come across a single place which lists which cards are supported and which are not. And what kind of hacks are needed to support some of the cards?

    Any pointers...anyone? This should be nice info even for home linux users.

    CP

    1. Re:Which cards are supported for Linux? by hercules_at_loki · · Score: 1

      The Linux disk will ship with Voodoo Graphics and Matrox G200/G400 GL drivers. The Matrox will require downloading the GLX module for the X server. OpenGL support is rapidly growing on Linux right now, so we will be having a live up-to-the-minute GL driver support page. It will contain the best stable drivers for supported cards along with step-by-step instructions on how to set your card up on Linux.

      --Sam

    2. Re:Which cards are supported for Linux? by drig · · Score: 1

      They did this an interesting way. You can specify glide or OpenGL (called "gl" and "glx"). I have a Matrox G400, which is playable. The VooDoo cards are supposed to be the fastest (sinc they don't have to use X). I also have an original TNT, which is way slow. I think it's theoretically possible to get it running with Mesa in software (no 3D hardware needed), but you'd get like a frame a week or something :)

      For stuff on setting up the G400/G200, try
      http://www.execpc.com/~tz/linglxqs.txt
      agp support is very important for speed.

      There's a README.Linux file that explains how to use a different Mesa library than the one that comes with the distribution, if you want to try it with support for different cards or the newest-latest version. I use

      ./linuxquake3 +set r_glxDriver libGL.so.1

      Right now, the big thing is waiting for XFree86 4.0. I don't think distributions (like RedHat) will integrate 3D support until the whole DRI thing is ready.

      -Dave

      --
      Citizens Against Plate Tectonics
    3. Re:Which cards are supported for Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Currently The Best supported Cards are the Voodoo family. (v1, vrush, vbanshee, v2, voodoo3 ) Nvidia released some rough drivers for the TNT1&2. dont know much more.. though i do know It actauly works (sorda kinda, and a bit slowly) And thier are currently people working on getting the Matrox G400 working under GLX. If you read some of John Carmacks Recent .plans You'll find that he mentions from time to time that he is involced in that project. ATI recently announced their releaseing specs for thier 3d and TV tuner boards.. Ive not heard /read of a project or of useable drivers though at this time.. As for the rest... GLaze 3d is going ot have linux drivers, And the GForce. When I cannot say.

    4. Re:Which cards are supported for Linux? by VinceJH · · Score: 1

      NVidia TNT/TNT2
      3dfx Voodoo Cards
      Matrox G200/G400

      3D cards with those chipsets should all work. Since those are the only consumer level cards that work well with q3 under linux, there is not really a reason to make a website to those 3 card types. It may look bad on the surface, but of course most 3D cards use one of those chipsets.

      --
      I know I will be moderated down for this, but . . . Vincent
  90. Which cards are supported for Linux? by chirayu · · Score: 1

    I havent been able to come across a single place which lists which cards are supported and which are not. And what kind of hacks are needed to support some of the cards?

    Any pointers...anyone? This should be nice info even for home (read layman) linux users.

    CP

  91. Quake, Privacy & Piracy by EAVY · · Score: 4

    Now that Quake 3: Arena is done and available for Windows already, there's an
    important issue to think about as it affects all versions (Win, Mac, Linux) and
    possibly the future of software in general: Central authentication servers. The
    latest kind of copy-protection for software online. You can only play on the
    Internet when your code (usually CD key) is authorized by a special server
    that's maintained by the producers. Not a new way of fighting software piracy
    but the very fact that now even id Software's Quake is relying on this means it
    could become a standard in future times.

    Another great game, Half-Life, already used it. When I found out about that, I
    stopped playing online, and still regret that I bought it. I always buy the few
    games I can play in my limited time, modifyable games like most of the 3D
    shooters really offer so much that the cost is nothing compared to the fun, and
    I recommend that to others as well. But the latest copy-protection crazyness is
    so frustrating, warez-dudes simply download the cracked programs for free while
    I pay for an original to show my support for the producer, but then I'm the one
    who has to deal with the stupid protection stuff and can't even make a backup
    of it or use it over the LAN on several machines simulatenously. Yet central
    authentication is even worse than that for three reasons:

    1. If the authentication server goes down, so does the game, nobody would be
    authorized to play. Only cracked games could be played on cracked servers. We
    who pay are left out, even if it's temporarily, it is a problem. Especially if
    the central servers get flooded or cracked...

    2. When a CD key is used to identify and authorize players, legit users will be
    locked out if their codes are stolen or generated with a key generator utility.
    If all software was protected with unique keys, breaking into a computer and
    stealing them would immediately render all your paid software unusable. You
    can't use it while the key is used by another user or when it's been blocked
    because of abuse or for any other reason.

    3. We're, once again, at the whim of the producer. It's very similar to DIVX.
    You don't have to pay to play online, at least not yet, but it could be
    implemented easily. Pay-per-Play, no thanks, either Pay-to-Own or nothing.
    Besides, what about privacy, if your unique ID number is transmitted (with
    hardware information, as harmless as it might seem, and who knows what else at
    a later time or by another entity) each time you want to connect to a server.

    I've been thinking about all of this since I got Half-Life. Now Quake 3: Arena
    is coming out and I'm waiting for the Linux Elite Edition. But I'm no longer so
    sure if I really want to buy it, of course I want to show my support for Linux,
    but I'm not going to support authentication copy protection. Just say no? It's
    hard if it's my favorite game! But if I make a mistake now, my next favorite
    game will have the same problem, so it's time to choose. We all have to make
    that decision. The point of this article is to raise awareness of the issue so
    you can make your own choice consciously.

    PS: I'm also interested in id Software's opinion on this issue (Johnc and Zoid
    are registered Slashdot readers). The latest happenings are so different from
    what they did before! Would John Carmack really prefer a world where all
    software that's used online requires central authentication servers? In many
    ways, id often sets a precedent, think about it...

    --
    -- Eavy (: Linux Is Not UniX :)
    1. Re:Quake, Privacy & Piracy by Zoid · · Score: 5

      We thought long and hard about CD Key issues before we decided to go with them. With a game like Quake3: Arena where multiplayer is an essential focus of the game--protecting against unlicensed use is a necessity.

      I'd like to address some of your points directly tho.

      1. The authentication code only denies when we are sure you aren't using a valid key. If the authentication server can't be reached, we allow the player on. We only deny when we're sure you're not legit. This may allow some unlicensed people to play, but overall the idea is to only annoy (and mostly deny) people who didn't buy the game.

      2. Stolen keys can be a problem. However, we have a pretty long key string and the chances of guessing (generating) one are several billions to one. The biggest concern I have is people ripping open boxes in stores and writing down keys (it happened with Half Life). I think there's a return policy for that. Activision would have more information about that.

      3. Yes, it can be viewed you are mostly at the whim of the producer. It is our game and you license it, not purchase it from us. You get unlimited play when you spend that one time purchase fee.

      In regards to LAN play, no keys are used when playing on a local LAN, so you can spawn LAN games with your friends.

      CD Key systems are a necessary evil. I'd wish we could go without one, but in the era of digital copying and licensing, it's one of the best solutions out there right now.

      Honestly, I think key based solutions for network specific software (The keys in Q3 are only used in multiplayer) is probably the way the future is heading.

      DIVX is an interesting comparison. The problem with DIVX is that it would track much more general information that we can with CDKeys. DIVX would tell them not only that you watch movies, but what movies, when and how many times. With CDKeys, all we know is that you bought our game and play it sometimes.

      As for privacy issues, sites like the CLQ, http://www.theclq.com, do much more tracking than CDKeys do. They poll all the servers everywhere and keep track of players and generate stats. We don't have any ability to attached a CDKey to player name (the name is not sent with the authorization request).

      I will agree that the privacy issues with unique identifier (key) based systems can be a little scary. We'll do our best to make sure that our system is used for what its intended for--to stop people from stealing our game.

      --
      /// Zoid.
    2. Re:Quake, Privacy & Piracy by slashdot-me · · Score: 1

      In other words, I can just drop packets going to your auth server and I get the game for free?

      ifconfig eth0:1 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
      where xxx is retrieved with tcpdump.

      Ryan

    3. Re:Quake, Privacy & Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That should be 'route add xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx reject'. Or, if you prefer, 'ipchains -A input -d xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx yyy -p udp -j DENY'

      And such things are probably inevitable; with luck a significant fraction of those who know how to do either of those will choose to purchase the game for the betterment of the OS or some such thing.

  92. Re:YES!!!! SCORE (0,Offtopic) HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    High Five!!! LET THE KARMA WHORE BURN!!

    Mwahahahahaha

  93. Nvidia customers still lose? by chirayu · · Score: 1

    The FAQ on nvidia.com says

    ". Due to the high demands Quake 3 puts on the client/server architecture of this implemetation, running Quake3 is not recommended. XFree86 4.0 will have a direct rendering architecture needed to use the 3D hardware effectively with Quake 3."

    URL : http://www.nvidia.com/Products.nsf/htmlmedia/softw are_drivers.html

  94. You are all funny by Listen+Up · · Score: 1

    Alright, here's what's funny about all you guys...a PC is not a gaming platform, a N64, Dreamcast, etc. is a gaming platform. The argument is funny. So, for example, I can buy a Dodge Ram V10 and drive it really, really fast, maybe over 134 MPH. The thought of that was really thrilling. Now, I can buy a Mitsubishi Eclipse GT or something and drive it really, really fast, maybe over 134MPH. Sure, they both go over 134MPH. But, the Dodge Ram is going to cost you approx. $20-30,000 extra dollars to customize it to the point where it would be safe to drive it at this high of a speed. The Mitsubishi comes that way standard, because it was made to drive fast, unlike the Dodge. This is the exact point of the argument. A PC can do games, but it was never designed, intended, or (without a shitload of extra crap) properly runs games. Now, the Dreamcast or whatever was made specifically to play games. That's it. The Dreamcast does not come with a word processor, because it was not supposed to. The hardware in a PC cannot possibly compete, at any level, which a custom 64-bit ASIC chip, like the ones found in console systems. The PC motherboard and video to RAM to CPU paths were never designed for gaming. They will never compete with a custom RISC machine designed for one specific purpose. If you want to play games, buy a console. End of argument.

    1. Re:You are all funny by Supergrass · · Score: 1

      "Custom chips designed for gaming" can now be found on consumer-level 3D graphics cards. They blaze.

      And saying that the "video to RAM to CPU paths" were never designed for gaming is misleading. Consoles often use CPUs designed for "traditional" computers (PowerPC, 68000, etc.). And what is AGP about?

      I find the vast amount of high-quality games on my PC to have a lot more play value in them than console games. Sure, when I have only a couple of minutes to play, I'll fire up a console and play for a few minutes, but when I really want to play something, I turn on my computer, because the games are much more involving.

      Graphics on a PC are superior, and will continue to be (albeit at a higher price point than a console). Unbelievers are invited to fire up Quake 3 or Unreal Tournament for proof.

      Besides, RTS and conventional strategy games on consoles stink... :)

      --
      Wherever there's a will, there's a motorway.
    2. Re:You are all funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You stupid bitch. Soul Caliber blows away Q3, you simple motherfucker. Keep throwing your fucking money away bitch.

  95. So does this get me the Windows version too? by florin · · Score: 2

    Maybe I'm overseeing something, but I'm wondering about one thing. The previous Linux Doom and Quake were distributed over ftp by idsoftware themselves, and they looked for the Windows retail CD for their data files.
    If I buy this Loki version, will I be able to use it as a key cd for the Windows version? Cause you just KNOW the Windows one will always be at least one revision ahead.
    I don't really care which platform I play it on. I'd like to buy the Linux version to show my support, but if it means that I won't be able to play with all the Windows users just because I have to wait a week longer for the latest patch, then it's not much good. I'd like to be able to switch to Windows just as long as is necessary. Also, the graphic card drivers for Windows tend to be more highly optimised, another reason why I want flexibility. What about authentication, will I get a license number from Loki that'll get me equivalent rights on the authentication servers?
    Florin

    1. Re:So does this get me the Windows version too? by hercules_at_loki · · Score: 2

      Yes, if you buy the Linux version, you will be able to download the Win32 version from ID's website in January.

      --Sam

    2. Re:So does this get me the Windows version too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually for the Matrox G400MAX(admittedly not a hardcore gamer card) the 1024x768 and below resolutions now are faster on linux than on windows by an average of about 3fps, this is with the bleeding edge cvs versions of the drivers though. See http://lists.openprojects.net/pipermail/glx-dev/19 99-December/002164.html

    3. Re:So does this get me the Windows version too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Will be'? That's REALLY stupid. Instead of showing he is a fair programmer, now he is also trying to what GT Interactive did to Linux Quake, by discriminating against Windows users? By doing so, John Carmack only proves himself as much of an idiot as GT Interactive.

    4. Re:So does this get me the Windows version too? by florin · · Score: 1

      Thanks Sam, chalk me up for one purchase then. I don't mind waiting a couple more days for yours to come out initially.

  96. Buy a console! by Mr.+Klaw · · Score: 1

    Quite honestly, that is what you want. The problem with a console though is you don't have the same amount of play with them. The 3D renderer cannot be changed, the CD-ROM speed can't be upgraded, and it's usually hard to put unusual hardware in them because they don't have the same connectors as PCs. Then there is what Carmack agrees is the most important ability of games to last, modifications. You'd either have to buy multiple CDs all with q3 and the modification (CTF, TF, etc.) and reboot just to switch, install them on a hard drive (defeating the purpose of a bootable CD), or just not play them. It would also get hard to play maps that did not come on the CD. Downloading the map and keeping it in memory would get to be a pain on slow connections.

    --
    -- "Well, Hello, Mr. Fancy-pants. I've got news for you pal, you ain't in control but two things right now, Jack and s
    1. Re:Buy a console! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, that means hes a sloppy coder, why do all the playstation games work fine? and never need updates and are bug free.

    2. Re:Buy a console! by Wiseleo · · Score: 1

      What we need is a self-installing linux distrubution geared for consumers.

      Granted, most slashdot readers will have no need for such a thing, but I know many people who will. This morning I had to explain someone how to type in a URL in their browser :-). I ended up telling them a different way so that they saw what I meant.

      As a matter of fact, that is what I am currently going to be working on now. Very slim distribution, most of the developer features left out, accenting rich multimedia and Internet support. I am not creating a yet another UNIX workstation that people will get lost in. I am not including servers that the consumers never need. I am not a developer, but a corporate network administrator. I see what desktop users are suffering with, and hopefully will be able to eliminate that.

      You can flame me for creating a version of Windows NT (I can't call it 9x for the life of me, it doesn't crash :) for home users, but the reality is that we have such a huge market of people waiting for something easy.

      Wouldn't it be nice to avoid installing something as complex as S.u.S.E just to play a game? I'd say all I really need for that purpose is well-designed X desktop, abundance of easy to select up to date drivers, easy to configure multimedia support, a web browser (possibly StarOffice as well, an option), and basic TCP stack. Can I fit this under 100mb? Definitely. Can I avoid packaging LaTeX and the like? Yes. Do I really need Fortran 77 on a home machine for a 15 year old kid? Probably not. Do I want the user to recompile a kernel? Unlikely.

      I am probably reinventing the wheel here, but if it helps to get 1 more user away from daily crashes, I'll be satisfied. I know that Caldera is going this way, but I was very dissatisfied with it when I took the point of view of a user.

      The beauty of Linux for experts is the infinite tweakability. The horror of Linux for newbies the infinite tweakability. Microsoft saw this the right way when they were developing a user interface. Sorry, I am not an operating systems zealot, and all flames in that regard shall be gracefully ignored. :-)

      I don't expect the Slashdot community to use this product, but I think it would be nice if I could just automatically resize a user's hard disk to give me about 100mb space (mostly for swap file), plus additional size required by game, OEM option, deploy a disk image, and boot it and then prompt the user to insert a game CD and have them playing. This is possible today, and I think if I can persuade a user that you can play a Linux game like you used to play DOS games, by rebooting to DOS prompt and running a batch file, they'll go for it.

      Do we really need things as basic as login security at home? Do I really need to enter a password just to play a game? :-) Think about it, I want to take the stability and flexibility of the Linux platform and basically make it Mac-like friendly. The awesome power doesn't have to be vividly displayed, it can often be as effective when not in plain sight.

      I would do a simple detect: if kernel not found on any partitions, present the "Install" dialog. If found, boot it etc...

      I think that people would like this, the source would obviously be GPL'ed and included on CD.

      Updates will be available at a distribution point and NOT broken unlike some distributions.

      All this time I was consumed making a black-box self-tuning file server, but now I'll actually make this release first.

      Thank you very much for the inspiration, everyone. I will try my best to make this project succeed.
      --
      Leonid S. Knyshov
      Network Administrator

      --
      Leonid S. Knyshov
      Find me on Quora :)
  97. Loki to Distribute Quake III Arena by Wandering+Wenus · · Score: 1

    All good but where is the BeOS version? I heard there was going to be one. I could play on Windoze, ish, gag, retch. I don't have Linux loaded right now, but maybe with a version of SuSE. SG, O.S.D.

  98. Why SuSE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do they include Linux?
    Why do they include SuSE Linux?
    IMHO SuSE is just not the best distro...

    1. Re:Why SuSE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno... Maybe because SuSE is/has the most recent release? That counts for something (I suppose.) IMHO SuSE is not the "best" distro either. But it is certainly not bad, and they did release a lot of cool security tools for Linux. Hmm...IMHO they should have included free beer with it...free beer and slashdot. Mmmmm...good...beer.

    2. Re:Why SuSE? by ragnarok · · Score: 1

      I believe (could be wrong) that carmack uses SuSE when he uses linux.

      --
      Search first, ask questions later.
  99. Hey! How about us PPC linuxers??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "For x86 compatible" Hey, how about us PowerPC users then? Q3test runs great on an iMac. We'll have to wait a bit I guess till the folks over at ID recognize the x86 for the weenie processor architecture it is and start supporting some REAL hardware.

    1. Re:Hey! How about us PPC linuxers??? by puetzk · · Score: 1

      Now now, without being such a flamer, I'd also like to see this happen (non-intel linux builds). But first Linux/PPC needs to get the HW accelerated Mesa/glx stuff running first...

      --
      The Matrix is going down for reboot now! Stopping reality: OK. The system is halted.
    2. Re:Hey! How about us PPC linuxers??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah No need to wait for Glide, get a Matrox ;) Do you think there will ever be a Linux/Alpha, Linux/PPC or NetBSD/i386 or NetBSD/alpha download for that matter? Will it depend on Mesa/glx stuff running or are there other issues? pthreads?

    3. Re:Hey! How about us PPC linuxers??? by puetzk · · Score: 1
      Do Matrox cards work in MacOS? If so, I'm sold... But I occasionally boot back, and 2d *at least* must work, I'm NOT going to crawl around and move the cable back and forth.

      --
      The Matrix is going down for reboot now! Stopping reality: OK. The system is halted.
  100. you weren't listening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I ran it at 60hz to purposely show that you can get high fps with lower refresh rates.

  101. Downgraded for Linux(TM) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many of us don't have 3D accelerators that work under Linux. While I'd like to have my hardware working under Linux, I realize that it's probably not going to happen any time this millenium.

    So instead, I have a suggestion. Mesa currently has only one mode for software rendering--high quality. Is there any way that a low-quality software rendering mode could be introduced into Mesa? How difficult would it be to add this to the libraries, maybe have it switched on/off by an environment variable? How much of a slow-down would it introduce into the libraries, by having forked logic like this?


    What a terrif idea. Let's send the message that Linux can't cope unless you specially cripple your games as a workaround for shitty driver support.

    That will bring the converts rolling in.

  102. About the 3dfx drivers and stuff... by Kit+Lo · · Score: 1

    Okay, the Linux package of Quake 3 will have SuSE Linux 6.3. However, the Linux drivers for my 3D graphics card (the 3dfx Voodoo3 2000 -- OC'd to 166MHz in Windoze) from 3dfxgamers.com are in RPM format. Is the installation routine for these drivers going to be a pain (from all of them dependency messages) for non-RedHat Linux distributions? I don't want to miss even one thing that I have to install.

    I know that I can get the RPM program from the Linux distro installation routine, but I'm not sure about what to download, what to update, and what to install yet. I don't feel right typing in the "nodeps" option in RPM if I'm not sure I have everything right. I have yet to know how to work with the /dev/3dfx module idea, for as I feel more comfortable with a monolithic (module-less) kernel.

    Will there be any extra instructions included for Linux newbies like myself to work with the software necessary for running Q3A in the first place?

    1. Re:About the 3dfx drivers and stuff... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SuSe uses RPM

    2. Re:About the 3dfx drivers and stuff... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SuSE Linux 6.3 already comes with the required Linux drivers for Voodoo-3 boards. BTW, you only need the Glide libraries (packages dev3dfx + glide_v3 + glidesdk, series x3d), because Quake3 comes with the required Mesa 3.1 Beta3 already compiled for Voodoo boards. But of course, you can also play with Mesa 3.0 compiled for Voodoo boards, which comes with SuSE 6.3 (packages mesa + mesa3dfx, series x3d).

  103. Try "Thief - Dark Project" by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1
    The best FPS to come along in a long time has to be "Thief, The Dark Project". It solves a lot of what's wrong with other FPSen - nothing in the plot to draw you into it, and the tactics are mostly a measure of dexterity rather than brains. Thief tried to set things up so that if you run through in hack-and-slash style, you die. You aren't a beefy marine with oodles of hit points. If it only takes about three hits to kill a typical bad guy, it only takes about three hits to kill you too. Plus, you get huge backstab bonuses for attacking when the victim is unaware - giving you a very good reason to be careful and sneaky. Plus the levels are based on finding certain items and getting out. Killing things on the way is just a means to the ends - you don't get any score from it. You can get in and out without any killing if you are good. (In fact that's often an extra condition used at the harder difficulty setting - you must finish the mission without leaving any dead bodies behind.) All around an excellent game and I can't wait for Thief 2.

    Now *thats* a game I'd love to have under Linux, especially the level editor.

    --

    Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    1. Re:Try "Thief - Dark Project" by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 1

      I heard that. I only wish Loki would port that game. I just finished Thief on the Expert setting last week. It is by far one of the best games I have ever played. (Looking Glass releases the most amazing games...) I added my comments to the Loki message board in what games they should port, and Thief was one of my choices.

      Still, here comes Quake 3. Lets hope we all buy it to support Linux, whether you love the FPS style or not!

      --
      Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
  104. Timing by Star+Traveller · · Score: 1
    It may be too late for Christmas, but it is perfect timing for Linus Torvalds' burthday

    I wonder how many Quake III games he'll get?

    --
    -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS/M/Sd?s-:a---->?c++UL+++P++++L++++ E+++W+++N+K-w---M-PSY+t+5?XtvbDI++
  105. Re: if they do its too slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BUy a new latest card of the store, damn no drivers for linux.... why wait 6-9months for beta drivers, when by that time there is another generation of Video cards to get above the previous, by the time the drivers are ready for Card#1, its so slow and shitty that you could buy card#2 and run 4x faster!!! so you buy card#2 and reapeat the whole process again!

    Linux support for3d cards is SHIT 100%

    Why bother, if you are serious about 3d and games, just run two machines for god sakes, have one machine running linux with your geeky tools and have another pure 100% windos box with latest 3d hardware, celeron433 etc.... for games.

  106. Re: To ID and Zoid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why dont you guys include a free Quake1 and Quake2 in the same box.

    Q1 will surely fly on a P500 with a Voodoo3500 or something.

  107. You mean like FastGL? by Temporal · · Score: 1

    I think FastGL does just that. Mabey you should read linuxgames.com more often. :-)

  108. Demand by molog · · Score: 1

    I have often heard that many companies do not port games to Linux siting that some of the ports that have been made have not done too well. Most of the problem is that these games had been around for a while when they were port to Linux and thus were old news having made their sales already. If a company truly wanted to see the full impact of a Linux game, that game would need to be released at the same time as the Windows release, otherwise people will just buy the windows version out of impatience. Pretty much, with the exception of Loki, most ports to Linux have been half assed IMHO. I just hope that this trend of getting the game out within a reasonable time in comparison to the other releases will be more common. I believe it is more robust then some realize.

    --
    So Linus, what are we going to do tonight?
    The same thing we do every night Tux. Try to take over the world!
  109. Tribes, baby! by whoop · · Score: 1

    Now there's a sweet game without any of this key business. Heck, you don't even need the CD after installing it. :) Yet, somehow they sell billions * and have a big following. I think much of that was due to it's cheapness ($19.99), and being fun. Hmm, even those deer huntin' games are like $19.99 and are in the top 10 sold games all the time. I think there's a trend there somewhere. Anyway, hopefully Tribes 2 will follow in the tradition.

    * Margin of error, +/- a few billion.

  110. OT: Tribes2 stats! by Snflwer98 · · Score: 2

    Here a link to some unofficial Stats reguarding Tribes2. Enjoy!

    Tribes2 FAQs...Posted by Star Lord

    --
    "I have lost my way in life, because I have lost my mind. I would go and search for it, but I'm afraid of what I'd find
  111. Re: if they do its too slow by geekd · · Score: 1

    "just run two machines for god sakes, have one machine running linux with your geeky tools and have another pure 100% windos box with latest 3d hardware, celeron433 etc.... for games."

    Most if us do.

    we call it "Wintendo"

    :-)

  112. Problem is... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    OpenGL's rendering model is going to make it "slow" except on the fastest machines- even if you lowered the quality. It's why they're not making it for LinuxPPC or AlphaLinux- yet.

    Which chipset do you have?

    ATI? In progress.
    NVidia? Provided- though slow. DRI promises to be a winner there.
    Matrox? Still a developer's release- but with persistance, a G200 or G400 is likely to be one of your better choices.
    S3 Rumor has it there's work started on it.
    SiS Data available, but work's waiting on someone to start it...

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  113. Well, blame NVidia- not Id... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    NVidia chose to not release details of the chip and recieve the same benefits of Open Source work like Matrox (and soon ATI) now enjoy. The drivers, while still are a developer release, seem to be faster in at least the Quake3 context than the Windows ICD for the same card. This is through those inefficient layers DRI removes. In theory, the GLX team could do the same thing for NVidia- if they would release register level specs for the chip like Matrox and ATI already have...

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  114. Its not that bad. by VinceJH · · Score: 1

    I havent played an FPS in a while (month or two), but after trying out q3demotest with my TNT under linux, the performance was fine. My definition of fine is 5+ fps, but q3demotest scores 3 times that:)

    Try it. Download demotest overnight, and see how it is.

    --
    I know I will be moderated down for this, but . . . Vincent
  115. Modification not updates by Mr.+Klaw · · Score: 1

    I wasn't talking about new versions. I was mentioning the creative 3rd party changes to the gameplay that usually require maps, textures, models, and client code additions.

    Playstation games tend to be more stable because they only have one platform to run on and they have only one shot since they can't issue updates.
    Not all playstation games work perfectly. Bushido Blade had a problem with the broadsword hitting the corpse. The bugs are harder to uncover, but they are there.

    --
    -- "Well, Hello, Mr. Fancy-pants. I've got news for you pal, you ain't in control but two things right now, Jack and s
  116. Bought It by Fuhrer · · Score: 1

    I'm not even a Linux user (but I have used it before, and am familiar with it), but I still bought Quake III Linux edition to support it. I can always download the Win32 binaries and use them with the Linux CD.

    Besides, the limited-edition tin box is cool. And I'm sure by now the Win32 limited-edtion sets must be sold out. Get your copy of Quake III from http://quake3.lokigames.com/ now!

  117. Re:why use windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's your problem - you're using Xfree-3.3.5. The latest q3a demo uses Xfree-3.9.16, with the built-in OpenGL. That version has gained a lot performance-wise over the earlier ones. What, did you think there is some inherent superiority in windoze, that Linux drivers would never catch up?

  118. Windows NT 4.0 by Jimithing+DMB · · Score: 1

    NT does use the El-Torito format and shows up as a hard-disk. Of course it shows up as a VERY SMALL hard disk because as soon as you kick into protected mode you can't see it (since it's basically hacking INT 13 to emulate an HD).

    Basically what the NT CD does is instead of those 3 floppies you get a small virtual hard-disk on the CD and you tell it which drivers you need and it loads them then starts the kernel.

    Right now at least with RH 6, RH is still emulating a floppy drive and just using their 1st boot disk as the image. It would probably be a better idea to emulate a hard-drive so that you wouldn't need other disks for weird SCSI adapters (you could just put the modules for ALL the SCSI adapters on the hard-disk image). That is (again) exactly what NT does.

    I was thinking about a bootable game CD myself. I think it'd be a VERY cool idea, the only problems I would see is that you need somewhere to save games. I suppose floppies would work, or maybe allow you to mount a partition and save files in some directory would work too.

    Hmm.. actually, the more I think about it, the more this becomes a good idea. Imagine: Software like the old days where you just put the disk in, and turned on the computer!

    That'd be cool!
    Dave.

  119. Ok... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...its nice that id is supporting Lin'ucks, and including a good distro is a great idea.


    But, is it me, or has id 'sold out'?


    -No multiplatform CD. They want to 'track' sales. Ok I love linux, linux loves me and you and Slashdot, but the linux version is not going to push a lot of sales because there simply are not that many linux gamers in the marketplace. Just because we post everyday on /. doesn't mean we are any kind of large group. Our group is very small, while computer gamers in general are just small. Id decided to be a stand out (and rack up free sales, I mean hard core gamers have to run a windows partition to get all the games, and we have to buy two copies of Q3!) and the rest of the industry is going to watch the unspectacular sales. I think we are going to get hurt. IMHO now isn't quite the right time to try and open the linux gaming market.

    -No download of other platforms until after the worlds biggest retail sales generator, xmas. This supports the above move.

    -Putting the sale until after xmas...[sarcasm] GEE HMMMMM AND THAT WONT SKEW THE SALES RESULTS DOWN NOW WILL IT? [/sarcasm]

    -Bullshit like the 'video card tracking'. I don't give a fuck if cl_motd 0 disables it, that also loses you a feature (simple update notification, which could be done without retrieving info from your computer...have all the friggin programmers in the world forgotten what passive means?!) and opens the door for the rest of the marketing weasels to put in in their games. Of course they don't have .plan files, so we will never hear shit about it!

    Also q3 is DM only...cmon tell me how Q3 dm is going to be soooooooooo much better than q2 and q1 dm?! Bots suck too, no matter who programs them. Until real AI shows up, I will always insist on human-human play above all else. Sure the computer can always beat you if done right: it can respond within nanoseconds with an instant hit weapon. No amount of faking (intentionally slow bots) will cover this fact up.

    Who is really going to buy q3 for the dm? One good week of dm, and you will be very sick of it: you will know who you can beat and who you can't, no special move or insight will change this much excpet for newbies learning how to strafe or whatever. The best will be the best and the rest the rest. All the good stuff comes from third parties and mods...wait wait wait.

    Bottom line: Id wants bottom dollar, and will sell us out to do it. They sold out the the distributor weasels bigtime. Id could fucking ship the game out from Podunk TX themselves and still make a shitload of money, but the bigger dollar sign has been traded for the soul of the company. They have enough clout to be and/or create their own distribution (quake2 sales alone would assure them shelf space) but noooooo. Well it was inevitable though, a company is founded to make $$$ above all else, and this truth is self evident over time.

    Yeah, I'm buying q3 of course. But if I had to choose between q3 and a well thought out game not as pretty...3 guesses as to what would happen, and the first 2 don't count. Thankfully my wallet allows me quite a few purchases this xmas season :)


    [end rant]

  120. Re: /proc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello Sam. I've played Civilization: Call To Power for Linux, Railroad Tycoon II Gold Edition for Linux, Myth II: Soulblighter for Linux, Eric's Ultimate Solitaire for Linux. Great fun. I have a problem you just might have an expertise about. I installed NetBSD now. Lately I haven't been able to play Myth II. I get an error message because NetBSD's /proc does not have the same design as Linux's /proc. Are there any other way myth2 will read memory size or so?

  121. Re:Video Card support? - G400 by kangasloth · · Score: 1

    G400, hands down.

    High quality card, very fast, has a glx driver now, and is developed by an traditional open source project. They haven't even gotten to multitexturing yet and it's already faster than the windows driver in 1024x768. And this is the driver that John Carmack himself is working on.

    Matrox has a reputation for quality cards and cooperation with open source types. Full specs == better drivers.

    See glx.on.openprojects.net for more info.

  122. Re: /proc by mvw · · Score: 2
    Include this fake:

    marc@oranje$ cd /usr/compat/linux/proc/
    marc@oranje$ ll
    total 3
    dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel - 512 Feb 6 1996 ./
    drwxr-xr-x 17 root wheel - 512 Dec 2 02:08 ../
    -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel - 318 Aug 17 23:37
    meminfo
    marc@oranje$ cat meminfo
    total: used: free: shared: buffers: cached:
    Mem: 131194880 128024576 3170304 32817152 2682880 82337792
    Swap: 131567616 6393856 125173760
    MemTotal: 128120 kB
    MemFree: 3096 kB
    MemShared: 32048 kB
    Buffers: 2620 kB
    Cached: 80408 kB
    SwapTotal: 128484 kB
    SwapFree: 122240 kB
    marc@oranje$

    You should have posted with e-mail, so I would have sent you this hint.

  123. Re: /proc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks marc. Havoc reported the bug for FreeBSD: http://fenris.lokigames.com/show_bug.cgi?id=418 nice fake :) Best regards, Mikkel

  124. Re:Quake, Privacy & Piracy - Rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rant -- Please bare with me.

    "CD Key systems are a necessary evil."
    They certainly are evil. Necessary? Hardly.
    I "prohibitedly copied" Quake 2 like a freak. To this day I install off a Class release of Quake 2 and then upgrade to 3.20.
    Know what?
    3.14+ doesn't require a CD to play. Know what else?
    I BOUGHT Quake 3 for Linux.
    Why? Because I support Linux games.
    Do I support CD-Keys? Not at all. I don't play half-life, starcraft, or any of them.
    A game should sell itself on its on merits not because "if we put a CD-Key in it the pirates will just go buy it". And that's not being theortical, that's being practical. If Quake 3 had licensed / bought / whatever the CD-illa technology so a CD could not be copied it still would have been a pointless endevour. Need a crack? That's what the 'net is for. Need a server? Use Shareware Gamespy. ID gets screwed and whatever cost it was for CD-illa was just wasted.
    If a game is good *most* people are going to buy it. If you artifically try to inflate sales with flashy graphics, lots of hype, but no substance, you won't make any money and for good cause! The world needs less crap anyway.
    Now Quake 3 for instance.... Would have sold any damn way! It's got the Quake name on it and the gameplay to match.
    Why did you add a CD-Key?
    Because Activision, the all mighty publisher, wanted greater protection on their investment?
    Well fuck them!
    Because the few people that came on board to ID aren't rich yet?
    Same to them!

    Can please somebody learn a lesson from that damn game Deer Hunter? Price point. $20.
    Make any game $20 and they sell like NUTS! Even crappy games like Deer Hunter! It's not like it's the crack addict with no money turning to stealing to get more crack. It's a game! Price it like one!

    Lastly,
    Do I support properity software? No.
    Then why did I buy Doom, Heroes of Might and Magic, Quake 1, Quake 3, Fallout?
    Because just like in the OS market (as if there was one...) the change will come. Open Source software (the GPL'd kind with little restrictions available to the maker) will provail.

    If I have to buy the Linux Version of Quake 3 to get the word out on Linux so be it. But I, for one, don't intended to pay for closed source games in the very near future.