Should you? In a utopia where no one wants to steal is that because of total police surveillance, because homes only contain junk bought on credit from Amazon not worth stealing, because thieves are all dead from drug overdoes, or because AI forces everyone to generate views for YouTube videos and won't let them outside.
from the accumulation of tax-free vanity donations from the wealthy, whose assets are insured and "stimulated" by the Federal Reserve: anytime anyone has a lot of free money it's a good bet the source is the "taxpayer" i.e. taxslave. This is probably some preemptive PR, since Rice was a proudly white-only school
swaths of the world where all this is still true and we turn a blind eye to it.
Because it's a fantasy.
In less prosperous times and places females suffer, but males do too, there is no malice at work...unless prosperity is delayed by those who can justify their own foolishness with a tick forward of a clock.
Why do american car companies insist on building stuff people can't afford anyways en masse?
Because it's all financed, similar to the retailers that offer payment plans on high-end appliances to people who can't afford the basic models, though the car companies don't need high interest to cover defaults because they will be bailed out by the taxpayers
It's kind of the whole point, it's like asking why beer contains alcohol. I guess they could use something like THC which is supposedly less addictive, but that is more mind-altering
Blame the central bank, which has been acting to increase the rate of inflation for many years now because it claims prices aren't going up fast enough; a fixed 10% isn't much while the Fed is hard at work making prices double, triple, quadruple, etc.
It's below the cost of living, so the gap needs to be made up with welfare. I guess you could say that is "gaming the system" while the real exploitation is the government printing money to cut wages so that people work for less money than they expect
And everyone who supports Twitter censorship says it's wrong to censor football players. If double-standard is the standard then Trump is no hypocrite.
If the jobs are subsidized by taxpayers then the conditions are a public matter. Also at some point working conditions are bad enough that the failure of employees to leave raises the issue of abuse of the mentally disabled
Historically, states have a 100% failure rate. The dollar only stopped being backed by gold 50 years ago, the only question is whether it was the end of the beginning or the beginning of the end.
Depends on first principles, you can produce "intellectuals" who believe anything. If a history department includes "gender studies" it's compromised, same as if the physics department offered a minor in astrology.
All government tax collection and all government regulation is done at gunpoint. Sure you could have a different style than militarized police, socialist dictatorships often have guys in street clothes and unmarked cars grab you off the street.
People wouldn't deposit their money in the bank if they didn't have a legal right to withdraw it when they wanted, but in a cashless system they have no control over their money, so the terms of accessing it could be anything. No doubt the economists have their God fantasy all worked out, even in the absence of a crisis there might be limits on how much you are allowed to spend on fast food or gasoline, for example.
Most likely the contract will go to Comcast, and consumers will be subjected to arbitrary bandwidth rationing. Government is the ultimate corporate racket, it is not here to help.
the more media coverage Hillary or Bernie get the worse they look because they have no charisma; the Democrat Party thought the only reason a nobody like Obama could push Hillary out of the way was because of race, but Hillary was actually inferior to a black man
Could probably remove every copy of a book from library shelves and generate a list of who has the checked out copies within minutes. Even if the procedure is not in place, you can imagine if a book with child porn images made it into libraries it would be gone very quickly, but it would continue to have a limited digital availability forever
Slashdot Mirror
Should you? In a utopia where no one wants to steal is that because of total police surveillance, because homes only contain junk bought on credit from Amazon not worth stealing, because thieves are all dead from drug overdoes, or because AI forces everyone to generate views for YouTube videos and won't let them outside.
legal to fuck for free, paying is still a crime
from the accumulation of tax-free vanity donations from the wealthy, whose assets are insured and "stimulated" by the Federal Reserve: anytime anyone has a lot of free money it's a good bet the source is the "taxpayer" i.e. taxslave. This is probably some preemptive PR, since Rice was a proudly white-only school
We forget too easily
Because it's a false memory.
swaths of the world where all this is still true and we turn a blind eye to it.
Because it's a fantasy.
In less prosperous times and places females suffer, but males do too, there is no malice at work...unless prosperity is delayed by those who can justify their own foolishness with a tick forward of a clock.
Why do american car companies insist on building stuff people can't afford anyways en masse?
Because it's all financed, similar to the retailers that offer payment plans on high-end appliances to people who can't afford the basic models, though the car companies don't need high interest to cover defaults because they will be bailed out by the taxpayers
I believe America is the only country where the masters decided to switch places with the slaves, so you can see how the terminology is too confusing
It's kind of the whole point, it's like asking why beer contains alcohol. I guess they could use something like THC which is supposedly less addictive, but that is more mind-altering
think this is really about censorship, which the young people all support
owe $200,000 paying for a house I no longer have
If the collateral is wiped out so is the loan; the insurance benefits the bank, which is why the bank forces you to pay for it.
If a fire or tornado destroys my house, I'll still have an house and won't have a mortgage payment
I don't advise torching it.
Blame the central bank, which has been acting to increase the rate of inflation for many years now because it claims prices aren't going up fast enough; a fixed 10% isn't much while the Fed is hard at work making prices double, triple, quadruple, etc.
It's below the cost of living, so the gap needs to be made up with welfare. I guess you could say that is "gaming the system" while the real exploitation is the government printing money to cut wages so that people work for less money than they expect
mandatory subject in public schools, can make 6-figures and retire early with no performance review
And everyone who supports Twitter censorship says it's wrong to censor football players. If double-standard is the standard then Trump is no hypocrite.
If the jobs are subsidized by taxpayers then the conditions are a public matter. Also at some point working conditions are bad enough that the failure of employees to leave raises the issue of abuse of the mentally disabled
Lots of gold being mined, though of course there is a limit, growth of paper economies is mostly all debt
Historically, states have a 100% failure rate. The dollar only stopped being backed by gold 50 years ago, the only question is whether it was the end of the beginning or the beginning of the end.
money is nothing, and everyone dies: life just another simulation
And nothing wrong with history or poli sci
Depends on first principles, you can produce "intellectuals" who believe anything. If a history department includes "gender studies" it's compromised, same as if the physics department offered a minor in astrology.
Like a cigarette company, probably produces a measurable drag on the economy.
not that crazy a number, since there is relentless money printing, every company will eventually be worth trillions
All government tax collection and all government regulation is done at gunpoint. Sure you could have a different style than militarized police, socialist dictatorships often have guys in street clothes and unmarked cars grab you off the street.
People wouldn't deposit their money in the bank if they didn't have a legal right to withdraw it when they wanted, but in a cashless system they have no control over their money, so the terms of accessing it could be anything. No doubt the economists have their God fantasy all worked out, even in the absence of a crisis there might be limits on how much you are allowed to spend on fast food or gasoline, for example.
Most likely the contract will go to Comcast, and consumers will be subjected to arbitrary bandwidth rationing. Government is the ultimate corporate racket, it is not here to help.
the more media coverage Hillary or Bernie get the worse they look because they have no charisma; the Democrat Party thought the only reason a nobody like Obama could push Hillary out of the way was because of race, but Hillary was actually inferior to a black man
Could probably remove every copy of a book from library shelves and generate a list of who has the checked out copies within minutes. Even if the procedure is not in place, you can imagine if a book with child porn images made it into libraries it would be gone very quickly, but it would continue to have a limited digital availability forever