Slashdot Mirror

You're not well on your way, you already are a terrible writer. Journey accomplished.

Read https://linkedin.com/robots.tx...

Especially at the end

User-agent: *
Disallow: /
 
# Notice: If you would like to crawl LinkedIn,
# please email whitelistcrawl@linkedin.com to apply
# for white listing.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse...

The biological differences between men and women have extremely little to do with aptitude or competence in the jobs that Google has. The only reason that "women don't like computers" is sociological. When I was in college in the early 80s, the balance of men and women in computer science was pretty good, but over time that has steadily dropped. The biology has not changed during that time. What has changed is the attitudes in the public and at work and especially the attitudes of parents. Once the public has an idea that a certain job is for boys and not girls, or vice versa, there's a lot of subtle pressure that makes it come true.

Look again, they're given a lot of explicit restrictions and a handful of explicit permissions. In Google's case those are limited to:
Allow: /psettings/guest-controls*
Allow: /psettings/guest-email-unsubscribe*
Allow: /psettings/sms-unsubscribe*
Allow: /psettings/guest-controls/retargeting-opt-out*
Allow: /settings/loid-email-unsubscribe-router*
Allow: /settings/loid-email-unsubscribe*
Allow: /help/

For reference, the first 6 are pages where one can unsubscribe from various forms of marketing and the last is LinkedIn's support section. Anything else Google indexes (and they have indexed a LOT of LinkedIn's content) is without explicit permission, possible even contrary to the 45 explicit restrictions they've been given. For example, I found this in Google's index, and /profile/ is listed as a Disallow rule.

Most of the search engines listed in that robots.txt have the same set of rules as Google. The only obvious exception is deepcrawl, which also has the following Allow rules:
# Profinder only for deepcrawl
Allow: /profinder*
Allow: /profinder/*

Not quite. From the article linked:
"The agency says it does have data logs on the attack but can't release those for privacy reasons."

So, it's not that it "has no documentation"-- it's that it can't (or won't) release documentation.

Not the same thing.

It's about the size of the lie.

Saying "it happened but we can't release any details". Is consistent with both a real DDOS and "well some IT staff thought it was a DDOS so we just kinda assumed they were right". Even if they're deliberately lying they haven't said enough to get in trouble.

Now, to release a paper trail means you're either releasing doctored evidence or evidence that is clearly wrong. Either way it's a lot easier to hold someone accountable. That's why the media pushes for these kinds of documents, because it holds officials accountable in a way that public statements can't.

Now, the attorney in question has been there since 2011, so she's not a Trump appointee and is probably legit... But Trump's appointees have had a few months to start asserting their authority. I'm not saying you shouldn't have been sceptical of official statements from Government organizations previously, but whatever scepticism you did have you should increase about 10-fold.

There is a final twist to this, if you're talking about evidence of a DDOS there is a legit concern about how easily you can anonymize it, even if you do strip out IPs some enterprising admin might recognize some timestamps from their own logs.

Duggan is no prize. Kim's LinkedIn page. Not that it matters w.r.t. to her allegations, but I'd rate her above him in terms of physical attractiveness.

Have been 100% telecommute for the past two years.

I think it has been a win/win for myself and my Employer.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse...

Why take internet and platforms on it such as social media so seriously ?...There's only one life that matters, and it's called Real Life.

The internet is part of reality. The internet is real life.

Social media is a serious medium of social interaction. People well-established in their careers and already married can possibly ignore it, but for anyone younger you need to have a social media presence to get a job and have good romantic prospects.

Social media is how people network. Social media is how people build and retain contacts. Social media is how people get jobs. HR people have been saying for years that not having a Facebook account is a mark against you. That story is from 2012. The importance of social media has only gone up since then.

Although the majority of people that use linkedin exclusively for their job searches do not come up successful, the MO for hiring managers makes it so that if you are not on linkedin, you are invisible. People find eachother on social networks. They might not use those platforms for contact or hiring decisions, but if you don't have a presence at all, your odds of being hired tanks very hard.

And these points don't even begin to cover the social pariah you make yourself out to be if you do not participate. Many people that do not have a Facebook account have stories of missing out on family news, social experiences, invites to events, and more. Your dating options dwindle down to less than your tiny circle of contacts if you are not participating. What do potential partners do before they willingly go on a date? Check a person's profiles and see if they are creepers, interesting, or have unnecessary drama in their lives.

Why take internet and platforms on it so seriously? Because they are real life. Society moves on. Once you could get by without a telephone. For many years you could get by without internet. For a few years social media was no big deal, something teenagers foolishly post their entire lives to. Today, the internet and social media is a big part of your identity, your career, your dating prospects; your reputation in the world exists online.

Technology improves and changes. Society changes too.

Here is the LinkedIn profile of the last one to go:

https://www.linkedin.com/in/el...

She is a bloody lawyer.

Just in case you think I was only being facetious.

Simultaneous Interpreting: Some Frequently Asked Questions!

Simultaneous interpreters normally work in teams of two per booth, taking turns in shifts of about 30 minutes each for a maximum of about three hours at a time, which has been found to be the maximum average time during which the necessary concentration and accuracy can be sustained.

For some reason, this came up in a machine learning resource I consumed recently.

Of course, this job is likely to be impacted fairly significantly, if the computers ever get to the really high level of accuracy required to pass the SALT hurdle.

(Any experienced U.N. translator would get that reference instantaneously.)

@jamesmartinluther

Oddly enough, I posted an article last night detailing some thoughts that crossed my mind about potential legal issues looming for Ethereum ( https://www.linkedin.com/pulse... ) and I'd love to get some feedback from someone connected with Ethereum on how the issues are being address--if at all.

I really don't see how Ethereum gets around their DAO issue when a legal challenge arises seeking a hard fork, it really seems like a sticking point to me.

Best regards,
Tyler

The publication evidence is that the major centers of research on deep learning are Redmond, Cambridge and universities in China -
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse...

Ever notice that most of these women filing these kinds of lawsuits are women you wouldn't want to fuck in the first place?

https://www.linkedin.com/in/el...

Really?
I mean sure she might not be to your tastes personally, but she doesn't look to me like the type of person the majority would find unattractive.

Seems he is bit over-rated manager type. His entire career his list his roles as manager or director. Never was a 'engineer' in the trenches. Only 3 of the companies are still in business(most of the rest were bought out). Not the first time he has jump ship after a short time. https://www.linkedin.com/in/da...

Lets just wait to see what he puts on his LinkedIn profile.

You mean wait to check on this?

https://www.linkedin.com/in/ni... Although I'd consider that there is a possible chance that they were actually hacked instead.

Agreed. This has been around for ages:

"If you can't innovate, litigate"

As much as I hate LinkedIn one of the pieces is interesting:

* "Don't Innovate, Just Litigate" - No Genuine Inventor Thinks That Way

--
* Main Street built America
* Wall Street destroyed America

I agree; notice in the article, they only say something about his high school grades. Not his college. Maybe he passed with a 2.0 GPA, and has no real skills.

Here are some links about him...

• his LinkedIn
• Ranking of University of Guelph (surprise, at 17th)
• Review of the school

Think of the big breaches, which I tracked until about five years ago... In the Zappos breach, hackers broke into their system and stole their database. They didnt guess passwords, just stole them.
In May 2005, GMail was hacked... via JavaScript, exposing contacts, personal data without cracking (or exposing) passwords.
When CardSystems Solutions (a payment processor) was hacked and 40 million credit card numbers stolen, it was by SQL Injection. Fust full names, addresses and passwords exposed without any password guessing.
TJX (TJ Maxx, a retailer) lost 45 million credit card records in a hack... by unprotected WiFi and unencrypted records.
Google's AdWords system by surrupticious files being installed. User passwords were stolen.
About ten years ago, Internet Explorer (yeah, I know...) facilitated look-alike sites to steal Hotmail (Microsoft), GMail and Yahoo passwords... but complexity or guessing were not the issue.
When Epsilon Data Management was hacked, it wasn't via guessed passwords, but they were stolen, compromisingcustomer accounts on Citibank, Chase, Target, Walgreen and Best Buy.
LinkedIn, the professional networking site, had six million passwords cracked-and-leaked in June 2012. The process was an attack on the server storage encryption, not on password strength.

The stupid thing was, when Zappos was hacked (again, not via password theft), they then decided to impose stringent password requirements. Amazon doesn't have such stringent requirements, so just for ease I've switched most of the purchases (about four a year) I used to do from Zappos over to Amazon.

No commercial airline flight is 24 hours. There used to be a 19 hour one for a Singapore to New York flight but that's no longer in service.

The Mashable report quoted in the Slashdot summary uses a slightly different phrasing from the original LinkedIn report. The LinkedIn article actually says "after having spent 24 hours cramped in an economy seat on Qatar Airways".

Poking around a bit on Kayak, I see a bunch of Qatar Airways itineraries from Lagos, Nigeria (LOS) to JFK that involve three segments, with stops in Doha, Qatar (DOH) and western Europe (CDG, FCO, MAN, etc.). Total travel time is 27 or 28 hours, with nominal times in flight adding up to about 23 hours. Add an hour in a holding pattern somewhere (or queued up for takeoff on a taxiway, or waiting for a gate to open up), and the poor guy could easily have spent 24 hours in an economy-class seat on his way to JFK. Yeah, the phrasing's a bit sneaky since he would have had a couple of short "intermissions" to stretch his legs...but still, if we figure he arrived at LOS two hours before his flight, he would have been stuck in the international air transport system for better (worse?) than thirty hours all told.

Four things, let's see

- Ignoring her complaints of “pervasive harassment”.

The article has specifics later: "harassment by men on the factory floor including but not limited to inappropriate language, whistling, and catcalls".

Not nice, but not wholly unexpected either. It's a factory floor, and all of her earlier positions were office jobs. The factory floor is not a place for special snowflakes - male or female.

- Paying her a lower salary than men doing the same work.

Not all people with the same job earn the same. Salary depends on various factors. It may depend on how good they are at the job. It may depend on whether they ask for a raise. It may depend on other factors, for example, on whether one is *actually* an engineer. She transferred in from sales and out to purchasing.. Her education isn't public, but with that work history, there is zero chance that she holds an engineering degree.

- Promoting less qualified men over her

Um, "qualified"? She lack an education to hold the position of Manufacturing Engineer, although Tesla normally demands that for their manufacturing engineers. She certainly has none of the work experience you would expect. Even then, a promotion depends on how well you do your job, how well you get along with your co-workers, and - most importantly - how well suited you are for the new responsibilities that the promotion would entail.

- Retaliating against her for raising concerns.

The bit of research above tends to point to Tesla trying too hard: they took a non-engineer and put her into a technical position that she was unqualified for. She failed, was moved to purchasing, and is now insulted. At least, that's sure what it looks like based on public information.

... They also have a director of Buddhist meditation, which is kind of weird tbh.

Once you're sitting on that huge pile of money, it's best to look contemplative...
Swimming around in it like Scrooge McDuck is right out!
Unless you're sure no one is looking.

One of the biggest software companies in the world. They make corporate software that CEOs like, for example, stuff to manage a manufacturing supply pipeline. These are things that a typical Silicon Valley programmer will not spontaneously build, because it's an area of life that we try to avoid.

They also have a director of Buddhist meditation, which is kind of weird tbh.

Or more likely there is only so much room to fit people in the Bay Area

Ummm, no. More likely this is another bubble, and we're seeing the first signs its going to pop. How many of these "businesses" that sell "free" products are actually turning a profit? And how many are just waiting to be bought out? Sound familiar? It's the tech version of flipping houses.

Most business folk are not the ones most keen to take improper advantage of people. Sure they make a business decision to move where the labor is cheaper, but what Trump is doing with Tariffs and such is no real skin off their nose, just telling them where it is most economical to redeploy. When my brother was in the military he sold books online that were discarded by other military people as they were deployed elsewhere. It bothered him not at all to completely refund someone who was not satisfied with a book's condition. My brother's LinkedIn page: https://www.linkedin.com/in/oc...

Did Musk offer proof Jose was working for the UAW? The guy's LinkedIn profile doesn't show that: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jo.... Just wondering if Musk is assuming the guy works for UAW or if he knows it.

My brother is an analyst. It would appear that part of his job is tending to AI platforms. https://www.linkedin.com/in/oc...

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse...

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse...

I think I've also read someplace that some states make it illegal to ask for that BEFORE making an offer, but I can't find a reference at the moment.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse...

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse...

I think I've also read someplace that some states make it illegal to ask for that BEFORE making an offer, but I can't find a reference at the moment.

Heh, they must have read my article, The Truth About AI. Happy to see some sense prevailing.

Clinton's stance, war-like though it was, was both more predictable and less likely to lead to nuclear conflagration

This is where we disagree. Clinton keeps her real positions private. This makes her unpredictable. My whole family are masters at the private-public game and my father is an attorney that for some reason prefers to sell children's clothes at Macy's. He also took off with those of us children that belong to him. My mom had another child after divorcing him. I have a sister that died, a brother who seems rather successful but married a Chinese woman, a half-sister that teaches, but has married and divorced several times, and a mother with a Bachelor's degree in psychology that drives for Uber. That isn't predictable.

To be charitable, he might be referred to as "hard bargaining".
Eccentric is hardly a good euphemism for "volatile". You fail at English. And volatile covers a wide range of actions as well. covering saying mean things to people to all-out warfare. And Trump is the saying mean things to people sort of person, not the all-out warfare type. And volatility is a make up of Hillary as well, as evidenced by her actions on going to war as Secretary of State. There are problems with the word, volitile as well. It can mean quick to anger or unpredictable. You are an utter failure at word choices.

You continue to illustate your lack of understanding of things outside your skill-set by thinking that talking like a person who is uninformed about how degrees work is actually an illustration of how much you know. Utter failure.

Now as you said, you might not read this, but i find it might be helpful to illustrate to others why your behavior should be a textbook example on how not to communicate well.

We had stupid choices for president. I didn't vote as none of them shared my values very much. Hillary shares some of the tactics my family is known to employ, but she is a rank amature in comparison. This is my brother: https://www.linkedin.com/in/oc... I am sort of a black sheep in the family as I have little to show for my life. I am a bit like the ruler of the universe in "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy"

It's the numbers I had at the ready. But it really doesn't matter. There is a housing stipend, and I have the utmost faith in the intelligence of you /. commenters to be able to work the various cost of living calculators available freely online.

But in the meantime I came across a better example. Here is the top paid positions per LinkedIn salary data. Start at the top and stop when you find the highest paid position that requires only an undergrad degree. Then stop whining.

https://blog.linkedin.com/2017...

What they need and what they ask for are two different things.

According to the Supreme court, the states are not even allowed to require a driver license to operate a motor vehicle:

The Right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but the common Right which he has under his Right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse...

So I'm not holding my breath to see the States opening a public debate about the need to determine the gender of citizens.

Red Hat has distinguished itself through its commitment to open source and its ability to remain profitable.

Mike Olson famously said "you can't build a successful stand-alone company purely on open source."[1] He argues that you cannot scale an open source model that does not rely on selling proprietary components because it is too easy for competitors to undercut a vendor's services offerings when they don't have to pay for R&D.

How do you feel about that assessment? Is Red Hat's success impossible to replicate by other open source companies?

What advice to you have for building a sustainable business, especially one that is driven by open source values?

[1] https://www.linkedin.com/pulse...

iOS users, never fear. Through the power of open Web APIs, you can still connect to LinkedIn without a native app. Just connect to https://www.linkedin.com./

Unless, of course, you're in a jurisdiction where NETWORK CONNECTIONS TO LINKEDIN SERVERS ARE BLOCKED, in which case even if you use the AMAZING side-loading or web access workarounds, you will STILL be unable to connect to the service.

But Android users will DEFINITELY be happy that they can load a native app that connects to nothing. I'm sure they'll get great value out of it.

Because he did.

No, you claim he did. You don't have any evidence. I can claim you tome me that you were the 2nd shooter on the Grassy Knoll. See how that works.

Yes, as I stated (and you quoted):

Denial

However, him saying it to me (which is what I have) was not hearsay.

Baahahahaha. What world do you live in? Huddleston was relaying to you an agreement he had with Apple. Did you see the agreement? No. Did you see any emails relating to the agreement? No. At best Huddleston was relaying to you conversations he had with Apple. Then you are trying to relay those conversations to me. Please read up on what hearsay means.

if I say no, does that mean it never happened? No, it still happened, it was still said, I know it was said, my source was first-party and, therefore, not hearsay. Again, it may be hearsay when I relay it, but it was not hearsay when it came to me.,

So again you have zero evidence and I don't believe a word you say. Only your word is that someone said something to you 6 years ago. Please read up on hearsay again because you're simply not getting it. You can state in court what you claim that Huddleston said; your statements cannot be used to prove the truth of what Huddleston said. See the difference?

Since he stopped mentioning X11 in his profile after Apple dropped X11.app, it stands to reason that either LinkedIn is an unreliable source, or he no longer works on X11 on Apple's behalf.

Why must you lie so much? Please read again as he worked on X11 under Apple from 2009 to 2013. X11.app was not included in Mountain Lion (RTM 25 July 2012) but was included in Lion (RTM 20 July 2011):

Senior Software Engineer - Darwin Runtime and Services, CoreOS
June 2009 - January 2013
X11 in OS X and its transition out of the OS into the open source community.

Your assertions are simply false.

We know he still maintains XQuartz, that much is indisputable. If he was still involved in X11 at all on Apple's behalf, it would be mentioned in his LinkedIn profile; unless, of course, you want to say that's not a reliable source, in which case you must also be willing to disregard the portion of his profile that you referenced.

It was. You are either denying it or didn't read it.

No, of course; however, being a man of reason, I can deduce it from the evidence at hand.

You have yet to produce any evidence. All we have is your word.

I repeat: You're not going to convince me otherwise, I really don't care if I convince you, and there's no audience for either of us to even be trying to convince. I'll go on being right, you go on being wrong, and let's just go out separate ways, eh?

I previously said if Huddleston says it, then I'll take your word. However considering the fact you don't believe his LinkedIn profile says you're a denier. Nothing will ever convince you you're wrong. And if Huddleston says you're wrong, what will you say? Will you try to argue with him about his own career?

Howso? He doesn't work on the project for Apple, his time spent working for Apple and his time working on the project do not overlap.

His LinkedIn profile says otherwise. Under his Apple time

Senior Software Engineer - Darwin Runtime and Services, CoreOS
June 2009 - January 2013
X11 in OS X and its transition out of the OS into the open source community.
Low level system runtime and services (eg: Libc, pthreads, command line tools).
Interposition layer between iOS Simulator and OS X host.
iOS Simulator Runtime and SDK
New hardware bringup.
Transition of iOS runtime and SDK to 64bit (arm64 device and x86_64 simulator).

Software Engineering Intern - BSD Team, CoreOS
January 2008 - June 2009
Engineer responsible for X11.app in OS X as well as the creation of the XQuartz Project

Maybe he was just lazy in his profile but if I did that work on my spare time, I would have not listed it under my employer. I would have listed it under another project like Sequoia. Also according to him, he spent 100% of his first 18 months at Apple working on a project not related to Apple according to you.

Early Sci-Fi authors worked in the military and academic research, and could see how technology was evolving. The earliest screens in the 1960's used CRT's and light pens to select menus on screens for CAD:

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse...

Finger controlled touch-screens became available for infotainment and training systems back in the 1980's. The whole point was that you could update the user interface would having to rewire control panels. All you had to do was update the GUI script files. That was a big improvement over all those dials, meters and levers over those systems from the 1960's and before. Desktop PC innovation in the 1980's was going from CGA to EGA, VGA, SVGA and up to programmable graphics boards (TI TMS340 range). That was getting close to avionics displays where pilots actually preferred the digitally rendered flght instruments rather than the real mechanical systems. VR helmets still consisted of little CRT screens.

If anything, tech companies were far ahead. I remember seeing Sun workstations in the 1980's that had PostScript displays. GUI Windows could be any shape (circular, oval, concave) along with fonts being any size.

According to his profile Netanel Rubin was in the IDF, so I googled for Smart Meters in Israel and, please forgive my source because it is not highly relevant, all I wanted was the model of meter. And what's interesting about that is that it does offer an optional turn-off relay.

HOA

What's one of those? Out here you just have to worry about the township telling you where and how much to dig.

if there were jobs there I could live out there but jobs are not located in rural america.

Tesla is hiring out here:

https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/...

https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/...

https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/...

Lets give you a short commute. Here's a 3 bed, 2 bath for $99k Another 3B, 2B for $60k Both larger than 1000 sqft too.

Then lets swing you to a long commute and set $200k as a ceiling. This house is 4 bed, 2 bath on 2.1 acres, $125k for 1600 sqft. 3B/2B. Or if you like a really well built house 4 beds 4 baths 3,106 sqft, built in 1855 (Ask the Europeans if that's 'old'). In a town no less.

You can repeat that experiment all across the US.

HOA

What's one of those? Out here you just have to worry about the township telling you where and how much to dig.

if there were jobs there I could live out there but jobs are not located in rural america.

Tesla is hiring out here:

https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/...

https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/...

https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/...

Lets give you a short commute. Here's a 3 bed, 2 bath for $99k Another 3B, 2B for $60k Both larger than 1000 sqft too.

Then lets swing you to a long commute and set $200k as a ceiling. This house is 4 bed, 2 bath on 2.1 acres, $125k for 1600 sqft. 3B/2B. Or if you like a really well built house 4 beds 4 baths 3,106 sqft, built in 1855 (Ask the Europeans if that's 'old'). In a town no less.

You can repeat that experiment all across the US.

HOA

What's one of those? Out here you just have to worry about the township telling you where and how much to dig.

if there were jobs there I could live out there but jobs are not located in rural america.

Tesla is hiring out here:

https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/...

https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/...

https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/...

Lets give you a short commute. Here's a 3 bed, 2 bath for $99k Another 3B, 2B for $60k Both larger than 1000 sqft too.

Then lets swing you to a long commute and set $200k as a ceiling. This house is 4 bed, 2 bath on 2.1 acres, $125k for 1600 sqft. 3B/2B. Or if you like a really well built house 4 beds 4 baths 3,106 sqft, built in 1855 (Ask the Europeans if that's 'old'). In a town no less.

You can repeat that experiment all across the US.

Here's an interesting rebuttal to the idea that it is "another Theranos".

Some key points:

- the product that was the source of this report "was not the Magic Leap's latest prototype"
- the investors that bought into Theranos were "rich individuals whose life sciences experience began and ended with high school biology", but the Magic Leap ones were âoesending their brilliant professors from all the top schools to try and shoot us down.â

I want Magic Leap to be real because it sounds cool. I'm disappointed that they (apparently) faked one of their demos but there are several really positive reports about it from fairly reputable individuals who have actually tried it - so I live in hope.

None of what you said has ANYTHING to do with what I wrote, nor what was in the article. Did YOU read the article, or did you just jump straight to the TEAM link at the top to "play the man, not the ball"?

This is the company in question. https://www.instrumental.ai/te...

It's a small startup of 9 people with no history. None of the people are even listed as mechanical engineers. They're all software engineers (which isn't a recognized profession, by the way) and business people. Not a one among them has the authority to make any claims about the Note 7.

Thanks for the link. Very helpful. If you read the article, you know that it says in the second paragraph (why don't I have to read beyond the first screen?):

As hardware engineers ourselves, Sam and I followed the story closely.

We can use the link you provided to find out who "Sam and I" are, and with its helpful embedded linkedin links, find out what just how unqualified they are to comment on the Samsung phone:

Anna Shedletsky

• Nearly 6 years experience as a System Product Design Engineer at Apple, including Apple Watch System Product Design Lead.
• Key specialties: mechanical design for mass production, in-factory implementation, data-based decision making, and rising to challenges.
• Stanford University Mechanical Engineering Bachelors and Masters. Continued education in Chinese.
• Apple Watch System Product Design Lead and Manager, October 2012 - February 2015
• iPod Product Design Engineer, July 2009 - October 2012

Samuel Weiss

• Massachusetts Institute of Technology BS Mechanical Engineering; Mathematics
• Stanford University Mechanical Engineering Masters
• Product Design Engineer - Apple Watch, July 2012 - June 2015

Oh dear. I certainly hope that those two experienced mechanical engineers spent more time examining the Note 7 problem than you spent attempting to trash their reputations. I guess Slashdot pest isn't a recognised profession either.

None of what you said has ANYTHING to do with what I wrote, nor what was in the article. Did YOU read the article, or did you just jump straight to the TEAM link at the top to "play the man, not the ball"?

This is the company in question. https://www.instrumental.ai/te...

It's a small startup of 9 people with no history. None of the people are even listed as mechanical engineers. They're all software engineers (which isn't a recognized profession, by the way) and business people. Not a one among them has the authority to make any claims about the Note 7.

Thanks for the link. Very helpful. If you read the article, you know that it says in the second paragraph (why don't I have to read beyond the first screen?):

As hardware engineers ourselves, Sam and I followed the story closely.

We can use the link you provided to find out who "Sam and I" are, and with its helpful embedded linkedin links, find out what just how unqualified they are to comment on the Samsung phone:

Anna Shedletsky

• Nearly 6 years experience as a System Product Design Engineer at Apple, including Apple Watch System Product Design Lead.
• Key specialties: mechanical design for mass production, in-factory implementation, data-based decision making, and rising to challenges.
• Stanford University Mechanical Engineering Bachelors and Masters. Continued education in Chinese.
• Apple Watch System Product Design Lead and Manager, October 2012 - February 2015
• iPod Product Design Engineer, July 2009 - October 2012

Samuel Weiss

• Massachusetts Institute of Technology BS Mechanical Engineering; Mathematics
• Stanford University Mechanical Engineering Masters
• Product Design Engineer - Apple Watch, July 2012 - June 2015

Oh dear. I certainly hope that those two experienced mechanical engineers spent more time examining the Note 7 problem than you spent attempting to trash their reputations. I guess Slashdot pest isn't a recognised profession either.

'Majid Hashemi : Avanade, a Microsoft / Accenture joint venture'

From billg:
To: mhashemi:
Cc: a.abbasi:
Msg: "Please write a report on Linux PLC malware so as to distract from the curent Microsoft Windows phishing/malware/virus infestation on the Internet."

Is there any other kind of rootkit except the undetectable kind. It's interesting that in that entire document they managed to mention Raspberry Pi 13 times, Linux 5 times and Microsoft Windows not at all.

No, as in Emily McMullin from Florida who works at Cendyn, some kind of computer company.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/em...

Airbnb should seek out regulation and alliances to grow their industry - instead of fighting with hotels, government, neighbors and advocates of affordable housing- https://www.linkedin.com/pulse...

I recommend you to study this even more closely, but here are some of the completely unbelievable things in this smear attempt against Assange:

"Their yellowpages site says they have been in business 5 years. http://www.yellowpages.com/hou...
Ok so how many times has this link been shared on reddit? I googled the URL specific to this site, and it's only come up three times. All within the last 24 hours."

"This shady dating site claims to be the "ONLY Dating Site to ever partner with the UN Initiative" (Now that's fucking odd...) AND THEY JUST GOT KICKED OUT OF THE UN FIVE DAYS AGO?!?!"

"Todd Hammonds LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/to... (It's fucking nothing) But it does say he lives in SF. I'm in the Bay Area also, I could pay a visit to offices if we can actually find any legitimate offices...
Their Dating Site Eventbrite page. Only one event for the fastest growing dating website that has married 3,000 people since 2011???
Here is the LinkedIn of "Kate Hogan," this is the person who wrote the "Press Release" about ToddAndClare accusing Assange of sexual misconduct. https://www.linkedin.com/in/ka...
Of course she's got only 1 connection, and no other real information anywhere. Also, the phone number listed in the press release rings twice and then immediately disconnects. But it doesn't give a recording, it just says "call failed" I've never really experienced that. Anyway you'd think that someone who just put out a press release regarding the UN and Assange would have a working phone!
http://www.prweb.com/releases/...
Here's their bullshit subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/todda... (No posts in three months)
Here's their weird "book" that they wrote about starting their company 5 years ago. Notice how every review is exactly 189 days old and all are very short and positive. This is shilling no doubt about it. http://www.barnesandnoble.com/..."

"How can their site, registered 20 sep 2015, claim 3000 marriages by November 2 2015? http://m.imgur.com/6BqmZPY https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=..."

"Thanks to /u/ChrissFinn for linking the email from Wikileaks that ToddAndClare originally sent to Assange to get all this started. They offer him $1 million dollars to do some sort of commercial. This is obviously a scam because they don't have a million dollars, they don't even have a legitimate mailing address or working fucking phone numbers! This was a set up from the very beginning!"

" all users images are cropped and mirrored and can be reverse google image searched to other locations. Plus none of the employees seem to exist. Email between Jullian and T&C.com https://wikileaks.org/IMG/pdf/... -Honeypot to get him to accept russian funds and discredit his leaks, failed, so they accused him of pedophilia instead. When searched for. The ToddandClare business location is actually identical to this company "Premise Data Corporation" https://local.yahoo.com/info-1... Here you can view its team page http://www.premise.com/ourteam... Who's board of directors has guess who "Larry Summers" Who goes by "Lawrence Summers" in "The Center for American Progress" Superpac