Slashdot Mirror


Gamespy.com's "Top 50 Games of All Time"

Alex Bischoff writes "In this article, Gamespy.com rates the "Top 50 Games of All Time" (both console and computer games), including commentary from developers at 3DRealms, id Software, Monolith Productions and others. Needless to say, Daikatana is not on the list ;)."

329 comments

  1. What about Sierra-style adventures? by Tack · · Score: 1
    Sierra's *Quest games were pretty popular last decade too. King's Quest I was a great, challenging game, and set the stage for a new genre of gaming. Let's also not forgot Space Quest, Police Quest, and the ever-perverted Leisure Suit Larry!

    Jason.

    1. Re:What about Sierra-style adventures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It all went to pot when they gave up the command line and went to 256 colors, agree? I must have played Quest for Glory I and II more than any other games, yet the rest of the seriers is complete crap! Space quest III also one of my favorites.

  2. Re:Bias by bigox · · Score: 1

    Rescue Rangers kicked ass! I remember fantasizing about a head to head version of that and how unrealistic it would be. Sheesh. Everyone had a secret sequence of vehicles and troops to deploy. The chopper versus chopper fighting was pretty cool, especially after you run out of ammo and need to use the balloons or your rocket launchers. But the worst thing is watching your troops getting bombed and you are just refeuling...

  3. Wait just a danged minute! by Ether+Trogg · · Score: 1
    They forgot the most important game of all time: Zero Wing.

    Any game with such gripping dialogue as:

    "What you say?", "Someone set up us the bomb!!!", "You have no chance to survive make your time," and the unforgettable "All your base are belong to us" surely deserves to rank at the top of this list.

    Why, I haven't seen dialogue delivery that compelling since my high school's rendition of Hamlet.

    --
    "The dead do not shoo-bop-aloo-bah." -- Kai, 'Lexx'
  4. Re:Bah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Ahhh, so you're the one responsible for "YIFF" in the high scores listing... That figures, it had to be a fox.

    I was admittedly rather disappointed myself in the lack of seeing Wasteland anyplace on that list, even though it was in at least a couple of the developer favorites. But, it's all good, I saw it in a PC Gamer top 50 a year or two back. Back before developers were too young to understand what pushing the envelope actually meant.

  5. Re:Clasics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what do you think zork is mang.

  6. Maniac Mansion by blogan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What? Maniac Mansion didn't make it onto the list! That game was great. Pick your characters and depending which characters you pick, you solve the game differently (they all have special talents). I think the only combination that didn't work was picking the two people that could repair the phones, because the phone repairing required another talent. Alot of the game was thinking, but some of it was how fast you could react (such as going into the kitchen and running from Edna to not get caught and then just walk through the kitchen).

    If only they'd come out with Maniac Mansion 3.

    1. Re:Maniac Mansion by polar+red · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I completely agree ... lucasarts did make some very good games, of which none were on the list :
      maniac mansion, day of the tentacle, the monkey island series... And I have the distinct feeling most games mentioned weren't older than 5 years. I guess they only interviewed very young people who didn't even touch a C64 in all there lives.
      My number one game of all time is and will ever be Maniac mansion.

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    2. Re:Maniac Mansion by Noke · · Score: 1

      They certainly should have mentioned starflight, I agree!

    3. Re:Maniac Mansion by arielb · · Score: 1

      I hear there will be Zak Mckracken 2!

      --
      ---
    4. Re:Maniac Mansion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The forgot Llamatron 2112 also! This list is so lame.

    5. Re:Maniac Mansion by Alorelith · · Score: 1

      Maniac Mansion! Wow, that was one of the most frightening games I've ever played. Nothing like suddenly walking into a room and seeing some ugly ass EGA character running after you. Maniac Mansion , along with X-Com UFO and Terror from the Deep, was truly a game made to frighten. Forget Resident Evil and other crap like that. MM and X-Com, AIYYEE!!!

    6. Re:Maniac Mansion by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      Definately.

      Wasteland was a 150% better RPG than the Bard's Tale, which was more of an exercise in mapping skills than anything else.

      They should have mentioned Starflight (from RA in 1986) instead of shitty rpg's like Wizardry.

      Also, Command HQ by Dan Bunten should have made an appearance.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    7. Re:Maniac Mansion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I folow Malda's example.

      It looks far worrse on teh front page.

    8. Re:Maniac Mansion by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      No, that's this problem.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    9. Re:Maniac Mansion by hyperizer · · Score: 1

      What? Maniac Mansion didn't make it onto the list!

      Agreed, it's a funny game, but any game that has the commands "Push," "Pull," "Open," "Unlock," and "Use" has some serious usability problems. Which do you use on a door?

    10. Re:Maniac Mansion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I definitely wish that people would not misspell such obvious words. They stick out like really sore thumbs.

  7. Super Mario 64 - possibly the greatest by iainl · · Score: 2

    Well, as I'd have to think for quite a while before agreeing to put it at anything other than number 1 this is quite clearly a matter of opinion. Don't forget that this was voted for by a whole bunch of people rather than an arbitrary list, so someone must agree with me that its really good. SMB3 was great, but to this day people try to release third-person 3d platform games, and to this day there hasn't been an equal to its perfect control and camera. Just go grab a Tomb Raider or Sonic Adventure game and laugh at how hard the rest of the world finds making something so intuitive.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  8. Re:Never heard of this game by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
    Has anyone played "Not enough storage is available to process this command.", and is it any good?

    No, it sucks. It also requires a special controller, something called a CowboyNeal. Instead of having a trigger or buttons, it has something called a slashdot effect.

    I got past the final level by mashing the refresh button repeatedly. Damn, I hate simple button mashers.

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  9. Re:A crime! by ascii7 · · Score: 1

    Well Pathways into Darkness wasn't even on the list and it was one of the first FPS for the mac.

  10. Graphics vs. Classics by Pollux · · Score: 2

    I wouldn't say teenagers, but instead game developers who are now obsessed with style rather than popularity.

    A lot of the games that made the list made it because it was the style the developers liked (DOOM's #1 for one reason -- it was the anchor for game developing all the way into the 3D market today). But I would rate the greatest games as those that were the most popular, not the ones with the most fantastic storyline or the most fantastic graphics.

    Deus Ex? Theif? Why are those there? Only because of the games style, not popularity. That's what I don't like about this list. The top 50 (at least the top 10) should have been about the games' popularity among players.

    DOOM should have been in the top 10, but not necessairly #1. I'm glad they put Civilization at #3, because that game deserves it. But there were two games that I thought belonged there, because of their popularity rather than style:

    1) Super Mario 3. It was the rave at the school, on the block, and even in the movie The Wizzard. Why the hell didn't it make it into the top 50? It should have been in at least the top 10.

    2) Pac Man. Someone was smoking something sweet to keep this absolute classic from the list. The fact of the matter is that you can still find this arcade game in some arcades standing next to these dollar-crunching graphic-munching games, and people still play it.

    Other notes: I'm glad to see they at least included Tetris, because it's right up there with PacMan in terms of still-played-classics. I was also disappointed not to find a single sports game up there on the list...they're just as big and popular a genre as RPG, Action, or Adventure.

    1. Re:Graphics vs. Classics by dimator · · Score: 2

      1) Super Mario 3.

      2) Pac Man.


      Couldn't agree more. Almost any "Top X games EVER!!!" list always includeds SMB3 towards the very top, if not #1. I mean, they made a movie about the game (not a story based off the game, mind you). THATS popularity.

      The original Zelda needs to be higher as well. As for Pac Man, if you're going to include it for popularity, you have to include Galaga. :)

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    2. Re:Graphics vs. Classics by d_lesage · · Score: 1

      The top 50 (at least the top 10) should have been about the games' popularity among players

      You can't be serious. Have you taken a look at the top-selling games in recent years? Myst. Who wants to be a millionaire? Deer hunter. Yeeeeech.

      Popularity is the last criteria they should use.

      --

      Ich werde nie wieder denken
  11. Pirates! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is not on the list? *SNIFF*
    And where are all the great C64 and Amiga games? This has to be a joke.

  12. LORD? by psychalgia · · Score: 1

    what about legends of the Red Dragon, thats got to be the grandfather of all online games.
    And SUPERMARIO BROS isnt even ON THERE? CMON.

    --

    ________________________________________________

    1. Re:LORD? by BassGuy23 · · Score: 0

      good call. I used to love playing that game before all the BBS's in my area went under. Is there anyplace that has a telnet version of some type?

      --

      ~Mike

      A big enough hammer fixes *anything*
    2. Re:LORD? by psychalgia · · Score: 1

      hehe, i just replied with damn near the same comment -- LORD was the grandfather of online based games like Counterstrike, i wasted HOURs hacking bbs just to play.... *sigh*
      also, my other comment inquired about super mario bros...whatsup with THAT? What about PONG, PACMAN, Or even GHOST HOUSE. WTF??!
      when we were young we didnt need no gd nvidia chip, we had 4k of video mem and that was JUST FINE!

      --

      ________________________________________________

    3. Re:LORD? by drc500free · · Score: 1

      Does anyone else remember a BBS Door game called Cyber Arena? It was HIGHLY interactive, with a Sim-City layout. Each person had a huge map and could invade other people's cities...

    4. Re:LORD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they were comparing 'video' games, not text based online games. Maybe that's why the BBS games got excluded. And you're right about CS. If it's the most popular online game ever, how did it not command a required top ten appearance at least?

  13. No ZX Spectrum games? by Varitek · · Score: 1

    I guess the list of coders they asked must have been predominately European. It's the only reason I can think of for no Sinclair Spectrum or BBC Micro games to be mentioned. Manic Miner. Revs. Jet Set Willy. Chuckie Egg. Atic Attack.

    And, of course, one of the most innovative games ever, the one that blazed the trail that Wing Commander followed, the first truly open-ended game I remember, the one that did free-360-degree-motion in 48k - Elite

    1. Re:No ZX Spectrum games? by Varitek · · Score: 1

      Uh. I meant predominately American of course

    2. Re:No ZX Spectrum games? by jameslore · · Score: 1

      Actually Elite did free 360 degree motion is 32Kb on the BBC B...apparently they even did an algorithm to generate the planet names (as hard coding took too much space). Definately deserved a mention.

    3. Re:No ZX Spectrum games? by mimbleton · · Score: 1

      Heh, Knight Lore and Ant Attack (3D!) were my utlimate games on Spectrum.

  14. Re:Bubble Bobble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I second that! It was the first game I ever played... *fnnf*.

  15. Bias towards FPS Games by doozer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now, I'll agree that they are probably the biggest selling genre, but what about the games that predated them:

    - Nethack / Moira / Etc - Where would the fps/rpg game be without these?
    - Infocom games - Same as the last
    - Just about any early Sierra game - There haven't been many games that have done as
    much groundbreaking as say, the King's Quest
    games

    Other types of games:
    - Microsoft flight simulator
    - Lemmings
    - Incrdible Machine
    - Pong

    I think there list should have been alot different

  16. NetHack props by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Just wanted to agree that it was a completely barren list without the presence of NetHack - truly the greatest game of all time. Diablo was number 6? It has .5% of the complexity of NetHack. Graphics, Shmaphics.

    1. Re:NetHack props by jfunk · · Score: 2

      You want both?

      Check out Falcon's Eye. It is a visually pleasing version of Nethack that I've been totally addicted to. It even has a big intro and a soundtrack. How can you go wrong?

  17. Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But Carmageddon gets my vote for #1. I just wish that a Linux version existed so I could still play it.

    1. Re:Sorry by xXgeneric+nicknameXx · · Score: 0
      I just wish that a Linux version existed so I could still play it.

      are you at all familiar with the concept of a dual boot machine?

      --

      My cat's breath smells like cat food.--R. Wiggums

  18. Re:They missed the best one....HUNT THE WHUMPUS! by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

    3d Monster Maze on the ZX81... predates DOOM (an Wolfenstein - why isn't that on there too?) by several years
    I may have the name wrong, but the FIRST monster(s) in the maze game I'm aware of was something like "hunt the whumpus"... Terrrifying Text menu action.

    --
    Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  19. Re:Biased towards PC/console, not just FPS by Dexter77 · · Score: 1

    >Dungeon Master. Very cool, very addictive, very Amiga. I think they eventually made a PC version

    You seem to be forgetting that Dungeon Master was first made to Atari ST and run on 512k; amiga version came a lot later and needed 1Mbyte (=memory extension since A500 contained only 512k).

  20. Re:Some Classics Missing? by Varitek · · Score: 1

    I totally agree about Day of the Tentacle. Still the best puzzle based point-n-clicker I've played - inventive time-travel puzzles, excellent humour, and the first game I remember that had sound clips for everything that was spoken. The concept of flushing objects down the toilet to send them to the future should have guaranteed a top-50 spot. Shrinking a sweater in a drier so you could warm up the hamster you had frozen in an ice machine for 200 hundred years in order that his hamster wheel could provide power - that genius should have made it top-ten.

  21. Re:Bias by iso · · Score: 2

    Agreed. The first few first-person shooters were impressive but since "Quake" there have been only a few that actually progressed the genre. I refuse to believe that there were that many genuinly good FPS games in the past few years.

    One glaring omission (unless I missed it somewhere) was the lack of a single Sierra *Quest game. Sure King's Quest got pretty silly when it became all point-and-click but King's Quest I was a great game for it's time, King's Quest III was really well done, and the Space Quest series was really clever. At least one of these deserves to be on the top 50 games of all time. It's good to see they remembered Star Control II though. ;)

    - j

  22. Count the clones! by jeti · · Score: 1

    I think a really good way to measure the importance of a game is to count the number of clones created. I think there are not only dozens but HUNDREDS of clones of titles like Artillery Duel, Asteroids, and BoulderDash.

    Of course it's hard to decide what has still to be considered a clone.

    1. Re:Count the clones! by CaseStudy · · Score: 1

      I think a really good way to measure the importance of a game is to count the number of clones created. I think there are not only dozens but HUNDREDS of clones of titles like Artillery Duel, Asteroids, and BoulderDash.

      Then it's a battle between Tetris, Solitaire and Minesweeper.

      The reason this doesn't work is because of the nature of copyright protection. A game's story, graphics and music are protected, but gameplay is not, which makes it a lot harder to clone a game like Final Fantasy than a game like Civilization.

  23. Again? by Kupek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For those of you who don't visit videogame sites with any regularity, you should probably know that these sites do an "Top $num Games" feature damn near every other week. So don't take this one to be the ultimate judgement of anything, if you think something is missing, it's probably because the few people who came up with it (surprise, surprise) have different tastes than you do.

    1. Re:Again? by dimator · · Score: 2

      It should further be noted that no one is the authority on this, and every damn gaming publication pulls this "Top X Games" shit to generate some hits/magazine purchases.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    2. Re:Again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This one is a bit different in that it's not just some editor's pick for the games they like - it was based on surveys of well-known developers from throughout the industry.

    3. Re:Again? by Kupek · · Score: 2

      That's been done before too.

    4. Re:Again? by harvardian · · Score: 2

      It should also be noted that the reason they publish the Top $num Games lists so frequently is because it takes very little effort and you have to scroll through 50,000 goddamn pages (and banners) to see the entire story.

      Bottom line in the industry nowadays is impression rate, not quality of content.

    5. Re:Again? by radartroop · · Score: 1

      You've got a good point. However, I have to say that I was impressed with the number, and variety, of industry opinion in Gamespy's hit-list. Quite an impressive panel. Thier comments are generally interesting, if not insightful. The level of participation from those in the Biz sets this survey apart from those I've seen elsewhere.

  24. Some observations by CaseStudy · · Score: 1

    I was surprised that RPGs were as well represented as they were, until I realized I was including things like Zelda, Diablo, EverQuest and Final Fantasy in the same category. The nine "pure" RPGs on the list are Baldur's Gate, Baldur's Gate 2, Bard's Tale, Planescape: Torment, Ultima 3, Ultima 4, Ultima 5, Ultima Underworld, and Wizardry I. In contrast, the ten pure shooters on the list (in my uninformed opinion) are Counter-Strike, Deus Ex, Doom, Duke Nukem 3D, Goldeneye, Half-Life, Marathon, Quake, Quake 2, and Thief; not only are these games rated higher (including the #1 and #2 spots), but the genre has been around for a much shorter time.

    1. Re:Some observations by iainl · · Score: 2

      I'd point out that Thief and to a fair extent Deus Ex aren't 'pure' shooters at all, and as leaders of the sneak-em-up genre are as close to being first-person RPGs as they are to a shoot everything and run like crazy blaster such as Quake 2 or Doom. Goldeneye is also very laid-back, and actually makes you play a bit more like Bond than a Duke Nukem character. So both your most popular genres are quite broad, and between them encompass most major PC releases of recent times.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  25. what about Pirates!?! or Pirates! Gold????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pirates Gold for the Genesis was my all time favorite!!!!

  26. I'm sorry by sowalsky · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but there are games on that list that should not be there, such as Age of Empires 2. It just wasn't that revolutionary or remarkable. SimCity should have been higher on that list, and some games I expected to see (but didn't) were Super Mario Brothers (everyone, I am sure, knows the path to beat World 8 level 4), Mortal Kombat, and PacMan.

  27. Missing Some? by EarTrumpet · · Score: 2, Informative

    They did list Zork, but in my opinion they were missing Colossal Cave Adventure & Nethack.

  28. Teenager games by Dexter77 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That list seems to be made by teenagers who never saw 80's games. There's no doubt that a person who has played games from the beginning of the 80's till today would've made entirelly different list.
    I have to say that I'm more than amused of the choices that made to the list.
    It's needless to argue about opinions, but some of those choices were like comparing the LOTR to a comic book.

    1. Re:Teenager games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only wierd thing...So many of the early ultima games...i'm sorry but i played those when they where new, and it wasn't that good, not till ultima 6 or so did it really get fun, that was after garriot got warren spacter working for him on it. Only one wizardry game? that's robbery. Wizardry 6: bane of the cosmic forge and wizardry 7: crusaders of the dark savant or some of the best rpgs ever. It looks like they cluelessly slapped in a few old games to make it look like they where really gamers back in the day and not just some generic poof who got creative writing degree in college and wanting to work for a internet company, heh. Cuase when it came to the old games, they had some puzzling shit. They probably flipped through PC Gamers top 50 and stole out a few old games heh. Thank god both System Shocks got on there. And Ultima Underworld.

      Damn, what about Alone in the dark, that game was awsome and the first of it's genre, it was one of those "and a new genre is borne" kinda moments in gameing.

  29. Never heard of this game by sharkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    The only game listed in that article is one I've never heard of. Has anyone played "Not enough storage is available to process this command.", and is it any good?

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  30. Nothing better to do by phantumstranger · · Score: 0, Redundant
    on a Sunday morning than /. a harmless 'ole site beyond belief?

    Hehehe, I can't talk, I helped too. Oh well, maybe heading over to ThinkGeek is in order (or is it just the banner ad up there?).

    --
    "From of old, there are not lacking things that have attained Oneness." - Lao Tzu
  31. This list is obviously bullshit. by Sax+Maniac · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't find Who Wants To Be A Millionaire or Deer Hunter at all on there. Goddamn elitists.

    --
    I can explanate how to administrate your network. You must configurate and segmentate it, so it can computate.
    1. Re:This list is obviously bullshit. by phalse+phace · · Score: 1
      "I can't find Who Wants To Be A Millionaire or Deer Hunter at all on there. Goddamn elitists."

      You think that's bad. I for one would have thought that Solitaire would be on there. Hell, it's pre-installed on almost every stinkin' PC out there.

    2. Re:This list is obviously bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Minesweeper man! That ones everywhere too.

  32. Some Classics Missing? by cmdrsed · · Score: 1

    I read the whole thing but I might have overlooked one of the spots. However, where are some of the great puzzle games from Lucas Arts? Sam & Max Hit The Road, Day of the Tentacle, etc. These were wonderful games!

    1. Re:Some Classics Missing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its like one big interconnected puzzle, great!

  33. Biased towards PC/console, not just FPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    While there were a few nods to non-PC, non-console games, most of those (e.g. Empire) eventually made it to the PC platform.
    • Here's my take on what's missing:
    • Dungeon Master. Very cool, very addictive, very Amiga. I think they eventually made a PC version.
    • Myst/Riven. I may have missed them in the list, but I swear they weren't there. HUGE oversight. Even if you hate things without gunfire and splattering guts, Myst was an incredible paradigm break, spawned a few clones, sold a bazillion copies, and, most importantly it introduced a lot of non-gamers to gaming!
    • Moria, Hack, NetHack. Or even Larn or Omega. Anything from rec.games.roguelike. I still like pulling up Moria on Linux because the gameplay kicks butt, even with VT100 graphics.
    • Spaceward Ho! I still think that Ho! was the first real game that was able to adapt PBM-style gaming into multiplayer, turn-based network games. Heck, we had a Ho!-down for my bachelor party.
    That's enough for now. Who could play all those FPS's without going crazy? I mean, yeah, I've played a few and enjoyed it, but the list was CLEARLY biased in that direction.
    1. Re:Biased towards PC/console, not just FPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A closer look at the list seems to narrow all of the games down to being either PC/console based after about 1992. They are missing out on the entire European side of gaming, which was big from around 1986-1994. There are no arcade games there, no Amiga games, no ST games, C64 games, Speccy games or anything, just EGA PC crap from the early 90s and some Nintendo guff. Decent games like Defender, Elite, Populous, Carrier Command, Manic Miner, Paradroid, Speedball 2 and Laser Squad are missing (And I guess many of you guys won't have heard of them). And Doom the best computer game ever? If the list was talking about 'Game Technologies before their time' then fair enough, but there were top-down shooters along similar lines that played better than Doom - Smash TV for example got much more hectic than Doom ever did...

  34. Clasics by KFK2 · · Score: 1

    You know, they could've at least included some clasics like PONG or some text based RPG's that came out before graphics that paved the way for the games we have to day.. and as another person mentioned, isn't one or two FPS enough? and in all honesty, Half Life was a cross between Quake and an RPG.. Kenny

  35. Re:Bah. by TomV · · Score: 1
    That list is painfully biased toward first-person shooters

    ...and also towards newer games.

    Now, technically speaking, obviously, the likes of Halflife appear to blow out the games of a decade ago totally. But really, to achieve Halflife on an MMX Pentium, while a great technical achievement, is maybe not quite on a par with achieving my personal favourite...

    Elite on a 6502-based BBC micro. (other versions don't quite make it in my book).

    To generate 8 galaxies of 256 planets from a randomizing algorithm taking just 3 bytes of seed data, and create within those galaxies an open-ended game, playable as real-time action, strategy, trading, exploration, and with no fixed ending, was nothing short of genius by Braben and Bell. It's a game I still play today. 17 years after it was released.

    A couple of others that this geriatric would have liked to see on the list

    • Pole Position - the first Geoff Crammond racing game I played, progenitor of the Grand Prix series now at v3 and still blindingly good. In fact, where were the racers?
    • Frak, Chuckie, Manic Miner, the whole Platform Game genre. which was perhaps as pervasive all those years back as the FPS's seem to be now. And of course Attack of the Mutant Camels and all the Llamatron stuff (vast respect ot the eternal YAK)
    • The Hobbit, and the whole Adventure genre, only lightly touched upon. And for that matter the original MUD's were, if not widely played by the standards of today's console market, gargantuanly influential.
    • Someone mentioned Pong. Today, it would seem stupidly simplistic. But it must be one of the all-time great games, along with Spacewar and Star Trek, simply because of the number of us turned on to the whole Computer thing at the time, and still working in the field two decades later. Yup, it's Pong's fault I'm in on a sunny sunday afternoon, and I don't hold it against it for one moment, because it was a genuinely eye-opening great game and the fascination it triggered is still in me today.
    Enough

    Elite, anyway.

    TomV

  36. Re:They forgot Tradewars. And how Tetris that low? by robvasquez · · Score: 1

    You've forgotten LORD

  37. Re:Driving Games?? by kfg · · Score: 1

    Tell me about it. Ok, driving games arn't quite as popular as they once were but Pole Position was the number one game in the world for some time as measured by quarters at the arcade.

    If you spend anytime reading gaming mags and sites you'll find that they're nearly always derisive of driving games though. Why? Damed if I know.

    I do know this though, when the current crop of kiddies is thinking of Half-Life as, " That old piece of crap" there will be people still playing Papyrus's "Grand Prix Legends" with the dedication of a professional.

    KFG

  38. Re:Why the bias? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    raven software made heretic/hexen.. shiny entertainment made earthworm jim. dunno about the rest PEACE

  39. Fuck Marathon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no more needs to be said.

  40. Missing out some classics by xiox · · Score: 1

    It seems very biased towards newer games, when other games were much more important. For example:

    Elite
    Elite II
    Adventure (plus other important adventure games)
    Pacman
    ...

    Okay they put Tetris in there, and I agree with Doom as number 1.

    1. Re:Missing out some classics by Charm · · Score: 1
      Elite II surely you mean Elite+.

      Also they missed out starglider, river raid, and not to mention Atari 2600 combat which was the first multiplayer game I ever played.

      --
      -- RTFM:Slackware::Beer:Saturday
  41. Huh? What this proves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at the people they are interviewing and getting commentary from. Ed Del Castillo? Washout from Westwood Studios, regarded as an immature idiot. Tom Mustaine? Another one of those "hey-I-used-a-Doom-editor-before, let's-move-to-Texas-and-work-near-Id" wannabes. This goes to show that 1) GameSpyDaily knows nothing about games and 2) They aren't very well-connected when it comes to prominent names in the game industry. And Doom the best game -ever-? Storyline? Plot? Detail? Richness? Replayability? Good lord. Morons.

  42. Jumpman by rknop · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did anybody ever play Jumpman from Epyx on the Commodore 64? I loved that game. Spent many hours playing it back in high school.

    More recently, I was sad that Myth II didn't make it to the top-50 list.

    -Rob

    1. Re:Jumpman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Jumpman absolutely kicked ass.

      Sheeit.

      -Rufus

    2. Re:Jumpman by nougatmachine · · Score: 1

      Jumpman was very innovative for it's day, at least for one thing: the levels weren't static. When you got to certain bombs in certain levels, the terrain would completely reform. This element of surprise was completely ahead of it's time. There were levels where, when you got to a bomb, the world would alternate between one thing being invisible to another, so you were required to pay a lot of attention. I feel that Jumpman is one of the most underrated games because of this.

    3. Re:Jumpman by Kevon · · Score: 1

      that one was a load of fun. Used to also play a game called Space Taxi a lot on the Commodore. I spent the last two days trying to figure out how to keep my old C128, Intellivision and Atari 5200 machines from when I was a kid. There were a lot of great games for those systems. The AD&D games for the Intellivision could easily stand in the top 50, I think. Star Raiders for the 5200 as well. Overall, it's a predictable list of games, I think. The only real crime for me is that Grim Fandango didn't make it.

    4. Re:Jumpman by Micah · · Score: 2

      Gaaaa! I just played Jumpman under VICE (Versetile Commodore Emulator) under Linux not too long ago!

      Also BC's Quest for Tires -- that game kicked all arse.

  43. Super Mario Brothers 3. [Re:Their top 10] by Forge · · Score: 1

    Super Mario Brothers 3.

    Games are about playing for enjoyment. SMB3 is the hands down winner in this category. It has a level of complexity and changing terain that I havn't seen anywhere else. It has ways of changing your characters capabilities and more importantly it has so manny diferent vilans as to drive you mad.

    I have sat down and played throgh the whole thing the long way (world by world without the jump zones) then upon completion start over again with 30 "P-Wings" in my stash.

    There simply isn't another game that can wast 6 straight hours of my time.

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
  44. Re:donno don't care by m0zone · · Score: 1

    Quake 1 runs half life maps now and CS etc etc plus its open source :P it shoulda got 2 place next to doom :)

    http://tomaz.quakesrc.org/

    http://darkplaces.gamevisions.com/

    http://www.telefragged.com/openquake/

    Half-life was ok but any game where you have to play jumping puzzles get old fast rather be forced to play myst while watching texas ranger

    m0zone

  45. This is news? by Sarcasmooo! · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ok, maybe it's just that I hate GSI, it's questionable business ethics, it's crappy content, and it's lame humor, but why is this news? Front page news even? I could spend the next 5 years making a list of all the 5,000 gaming networks and the 20,000 lists they've made that rate games in every possible way by all categories imaginable. But it only takes one sentence to describe every single list: Useless content-filler written by people that have to pander to the company responsible for every eligible game, or risk being refused 'exclusive content' in the future. I'd be curious to know how many of the 50 asses that were kissed in this list are presently in no position to reciprocate.

    1. Re:This is news? by siokaos · · Score: 1

      Nerds already know the greatest games. We don't need a company to tell us.

      --
      http://siokaos.org/
    2. Re:This is news? by siokaos · · Score: 1

      Thank you for making a unique, intellegent, point, unlike 99% of the slashdotters who merely gripe that their favorite list is not there. I support people like you.

      --
      http://siokaos.org/
    3. Re:This is news? by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      "News for nerds. Stuff that matters."

      THAT is why it is here!!!!!

      Duh!!!

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  46. Re:You're right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do not forget the Zelda for Game Boy (Link's Awakening). It's not as popular because people assume it's not as good, but it's possibly the best of the series.

  47. Re:Myst??? by frknfrk · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    I couldn't watch my dad or sister play Myst for more than 5 minutes without going, 'god, get that off my computer now before it makes my other -real- games suck.' Not quite as bad as 'Alone in the Dark', but really, really, really close.

    --
    The REAL sam_at_caveman_dot_org is user ID 13833.
  48. most addictive game? by Valpis · · Score: 1

    Didn't find the game that has jept me sleepless most night, the game that once you start play it always keeps you busy. And still havent completed it yet, still some more things to solve. Am I the only one playing windows here?

    --
    who shot the cat in the hat to experiment is insane
    1. Re:most addictive game? by slashBastard · · Score: 1

      Tetris.....not the best game I've played but by far the most addictive. I thought I was the only person who fell asleep making blocks fit together in my mind but so did all my friends who played the game. I didn't even like the game that much but my brain insisted I play. (Best Game IMHO: Half-Life)

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- ---
      No sig. today thank you.
  49. Your list is wrong by CaseStudy · · Score: 1

    Your top 10 are incorrect. Age of Empires appearing twice (at #14 and #11) should have been a clue. The real top 10 went:

    1. Doom
    2. Half-Life
    3. Warcraft 2
    4. Civilization
    5. Quake
    6. Diablo
    7. Ultima 4
    8. Ultima Underworld
    9. Starcraft
    10. Legend of Zelda

    Super Mario Bros. and System Shock 1 were nowhere on the list.

    1. Re:Your list is wrong by Asterisk · · Score: 1

      The top ten list at the end was what it would have been if they'd counted game series rather than individual games. Civilization in the #3 spot on that list counted both Civ and Civ2; The Ultima in the #2 spot was the entire Ultima series, not just the first Ultima.

    2. Re:Your list is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, System Shock was on the list great master of the dumbening of the asses.

    3. Re:Your list is wrong by hearingaid · · Score: 1

      Interesting... I copied the top 10 from the bit at the end where they said what the top 10 were, then went one-by-one through the rest of the list.

      looks like they got it wrong :)

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

  50. What a joke by dh003i · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Please, what kind of "top 50" list is this? they mentioned freaking DukeNukem and Quake -- blatent take offs of Doom -- but left out the best vehicular shooter game of all time, Descent? Descent is hands down a much more revolutionary and realistic game than its land-bound counterparts Doom, Quake, and DukeNukem. Why do I say that? Well, first of all Descent took the first person shooter genre and turned it upside down on its head -- literally. Secondly, Descent's graphics were revolutionary for the time: it was really the only game at the time that really looked 3D. Not to mention, the AI in Descent I(and the rest of the series) is arguably superior to any AI in any other 1st person shooter games. Most impressive, though, is the very realistic perception of physics in the Descent series: when you bump into something, it FEELS like you've bumped into it. Unlike in Duke Nukem or Doom or Quake, where when you bump into something, the legs of the character keep on moving, and it feels like you've just hita squishy force-field or something.

    And also, where is Tomb Raider? Tomb Raider was also a revolutionary game, though buggy. It really pulled you in, because you felt like you were actually on some archeological dig.

  51. Re:Bah! Where are Pacman? Asteroids? Missile Comma by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

    One game that should have been on the list: Adventure, for the Atari (2600)

    The first time I wandered into the lower rooms and a dragon came at me, I almost shit my pants. This was no stupid @ sign coming at me, this was a damned dragon! Ok, so its pixels were the size of (to pick a daily topic) Xenia Seeberg's lips, but that didn't matter.

    --
    I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  52. Top 50 Suckiest games of all time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK New list.
    Top 50 'suckiest' games of all time.
    Who wants to start with #50?

  53. Bah. by Snowfox · · Score: 4, Insightful
    That list is painfully biased toward first-person shooters where action games are concerned. I'm not a FPS or strategy fan, so about 2/3 of that list gets a huge yawn.

    Let me give props to my faves -

    Give me Paradroid 90 on the Amiga. Give me Uridium on the C-64. Give me Attack of the Mutant Camels on the C-64. Give me the NES and Turbo Grafx 16 ports of Galaga. Gate of Thunder and Lords of Thunder on the Turbo Grafx CD are so beautifully perfect they'll bring tears to your eyes, and Super Star Soldier on the Turbo Grafx quite possibly has the most perfectly tweaked play of any shooter ever.

    I loved Tempest 2000 on the Saturn (I'm biased - I wrote half of that and most of Tempext/X3 on PSX.) A&E was sweet and very replayable on the Apple ][, but not half as replayable as Lode Runner on the same. Jump Man was great on every platform, and cloyingly cute as it is, Flicky may have been the best Genesis game.

    1. Re:Bah. by Snowfox · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Bomberman.

      No game list is complete without Bomberman, and I left that off.

      Until you've had a bunch of guys over for beer and Bomberman, you haven't had fun.

      Go with Bomberman or Bomberman '93 on the Turbo Grafx. '94 and later, and the SNES ports go overboard on the features and ruin the simple skill-based fun of the game.

    2. Re:Bah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First person shooters are so fucking boring. Half-life breathed a little life back into the genre but even that got boring. The latest, Max Payne looked real pretty on my super expensive video card, but the gameplay was only moderatly above snoozefest. And RTS, sure it's kinda fun at first, but that's the same shit over and over with these games. RPG is at least a diverse genre, many different styles and feels. Why can't shooters or RTS be like that.

      This may sound retarded, but i wouldn't mind playing a nice side scrolling platform jumper again. Super mario 2 or 3 style. Does everything have to be 3d now just cuase it can?

    3. Re:Bah. by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      That's why I always play FPS on the hardest levels. Quake on Nightmare is now trivial to me. Duke Nukem (hardest non-monster-respawn), "Game Over!" Seriously Sam, naturally, and I even fought the end boss to a standstill for 45 in-game minutes before figuring out I was supposed to go into the pyramid and do the trick kill. Thief? Expert, no-kill-youski, now that's a challenge. Real RPG-like, too. Why should you, a Thief, be able to beat a guard in a 1-on-1 confrontation?

      > This may sound retarded, but i wouldn't mind
      > playing a nice side scrolling platform jumper
      > again.

      Ehh, the isometric views of Diablo II and BG II are hideously outdated (heck, the I's were hideously outdated) but the games are still fun to play. I swore after BG I that I would never again buy another isometric game, but I gave in for the II's of both.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  54. It's fair: Doom is the #1 by asr_br · · Score: 0

    Althought I think this list is missing games from before 1990, the 1st place is fair:

    DOOM!!!
    Just the best :)

    Owh, yes, and the second: Half life :)

    "Crie um Sistema Operacional que qualqueridiota possa utilizar e grandes idiotas o utilizarão"

  55. #1 selling game of all times not on the list. by Pinky · · Score: 1

    The number one selling game of all times, Myst, is not on the list. Hummm.. and did I miss unreal?

  56. Re: CounterStrike by TomV · · Score: 1
    ...the list was compiled by polling Gamespy staff and several "prominent" PC developers' top 10 games of all time.

    ...and of course, prominence comes and goes. Plenty of people at M$ games, iD, Sony and the likes, but once upon a time, we' actually choose games specifically because of the authors.

    Back in the days when i had all my own teeth and hair, ;-), I'd look out for stuff by 'prominent' developers including: Ian Bell, Donald Braben (Elite) Jeff Minter a.k.a. Yak (Llamasoft) Geoff Crammond (racing games for Microprose plus the mind-blowing Sentinel.) Matthew Smith (bugByte - wrote Manic Miner, Jet Set Willy) Nick Pelling (Arcadians, Zalaga, Frak!) Chris Roberts (Wing Commander)

    and so on. One thing I'd be fascinated to see is a top (however many) games written after the 8-bit era, as ranked by a good selection of this previous generation of writers. I've got some idea of what Yak likes, from postings on alt.music.pink-floyd, wher he's still very much a regular, and perhaps a converse exercise where the 16+ bit guys rated the earlier stuff.

    It's a cliche, sure, but when the tech was that limited, a game could only live or die by its gameplay. Not that it's impossible to have innovative gameplay now, but it IS a lot easierto get away with a vacuous remake of a remake as long as the pictures are unprecedentedly pretty.

    TomV

  57. Civ and Quake behind Warcraft? by tre · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's just me, but weren't those alot more popular games? Doom took #1 which I can't entirely agree or disagree with because it is definately a classic, but I think the top 10 list is a bit askew. I wonder what type of monetary compensation, if any, gamespy is getting or has gotten from "selling" positioning in that list...

    1. Re:Civ and Quake behind Warcraft? by D_Gr8_BoB · · Score: 1

      I agree, and I still can't believe they didn't even mention Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri or Pirates!

    2. Re:Civ and Quake behind Warcraft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea I sorta wondered the same thing. I mean Warcraft was fun but CIV was a game that REALLY sucked you in for days on end. Quake is THE video game in my book. People have Quake Tattoos, cars. You name it. For a while they only thing people did was play Quake online. It really was the first video game to bring the net together into a vast comunity. Warcraft?! Hello

    3. Re:Civ and Quake behind Warcraft? by CaseStudy · · Score: 1

      I think it's a bit predictable that the list is unbalanced in favor of games that are selling today. For one thing, more people have played them; for another, some people polled appeared to adjust for the technology of the time but some didn't, putting old games at a disadvantage. (The old games listed aren't necessarily better; they just influenced the current games more.)

  58. Re:Uh? by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

    > If we want to go retro, why is Starcraft in there?

    And how could Starcraft outrank Total Annhilation (much less the tragedy of TA only ranking 50th?) Yes, the inter-mission banter was novel, but the gameplay? Good, but that spectacular?

    Anyhoo, if you see Dark Colony in a bargain bin, it's a pretty good RTS, too. Very similar to Warcraft, but prettier. It never took off like TA and Starcraft, sadly.

    --
    I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  59. wow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FF3 is the only one of the series that made the list, and Final Fantasy 3 is the only one in the FF series that I did *NOT* like, which many people I know agree with. I'm really surprised by this one.

  60. Top 50 of all time? by CrudPuppy · · Score: 1

    This should have been more appropriately called
    "Top 50 games of the decade". I mean, I'm glad
    they included Zork, Doom, and a few other "classics",
    but where in the world were ground-breaking
    games like Gauntlet, Pacman, Space Harrier,
    AfterBurner, etc??

    --
    A year spent in artificial intelligence is enough to make one believe in God.
    1. Re:Top 50 of all time? by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      The list shows the age of the majority of voters.

      Doom, for example, was a great game, but it was really just incremental evolution over Wolf 3D, the much bigger game in my opinion.

      The next big change was Duke Nukem, then Quake, followed by Half Life in the 3D FPS.

      I'm also sad that mods didn't count. In my own list, Quake CTF mod is hands-down the biggest game in history.

      I cut my online FPS teeth on Duke Nukem on T.E.N., and then started playing Quake online when I got it. (It was months before I got around to finishing the actual Quake game, Nightmare of course.)

      Quake deathmatch was fantastic, but a couple of months later, I downloaded the CTF mod. It was 3.5, I think, the first one to implement the actual flag to carry (rather than keys.)

      I still remember A Tale of Two Cities (I think, two castles behind doors and a double-no man's land separated by a tiny little portal.)

      I remember playing D, being in one of the no man's lands and seeing a guy on my team running through the dark with the glowing flag waving behind him.

      That was one of the epiphanal moments of my life. Coolness and fun factors pegged off scale high.

      I realized at that point that all other games throughout human history had been leading up to this point: the online, multiplayer team-based game.

      I played the game nonstop from 11 AM (when I installed the patch and started playing) through 11 PM of the next day, a full 36 hours. I was falling asleep at the keyboard and went home, angry that I could not continue playing.

      My god, there was nothing like it, before or since.

      Quakeworld code and other client-side prediction games ruined it. I cannot stand seeing people warp around, much less myself. Hopefully, omnipresent broadband will cause a return to these days. "Robustness" = "unrealistic" in net play.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  61. My List by Uttles · · Score: 1

    Doom #1? Come on...
    My picks:
    #10 - Sim City
    # 9 - Marathon
    # 8 - Quake II
    # 7 - GoldenEye
    # 6 - Mario Kart
    # 5 - Asteroids
    # 4 - Madden Football
    # 3 - Starcraft
    # 2 - Metroid
    # 1 - Perfect Dark

    --

    ~ now you know
  62. Re:My favorite game... denied! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not true -- skin grafts can work wonders for burnt cock.

  63. What about Heroes? by Anomaly+Coward · · Score: 1

    Heroes of Might and Magic. Certainly in my top ten, and just about the most addictive game I've played. Any one in that series belongs above 80% of that list.

  64. Wizball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about Wizball. Number 1 i think it should have been. Just pure brilliance.

  65. My own list by randy_ch · · Score: 1

    1. Final Fantasy X
    2. Final Fantasy IX
    3. Final Fantasy VIII
    4. Final Fantasy VII
    5. Final Fantasy VI
    6. Final Fantasy V
    7. Final Fantasy IV
    8. Final Fantasy III
    9. Final Fantasy II
    10.Final Fantasy I

  66. Driving Games?? by stpats · · Score: 1
    Lots of different genres and platforms are represented, but where are the driving games? I don't think there's even a single one in any of the many top 10s that are listed throughout the pages of GameSpy's top 50.

    Pole Position I+II were money! Need for Speed III's different multiplayer modes and unofficial cars made by fans made it great.

    Super Monaco GP for Arcade or Genesis? Great!

    I guess driving games just don't count or what? They seem to be pretty big sellers though!

  67. Re:The need to rank. by JWhiton · · Score: 1
    Because it looks more official, cooler, and will generate a lot more traffic and controversy about your web site if you try and rank games.

    Nobody wants to read a "these games are nifty!" page. Well, not enough to make your sponsors happy.

  68. What about Mayhem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing like Cannibalism, Suicide, Murder, and Church burnings to start off your day.

  69. What The? by pentae · · Score: 1

    Why didnt Sierra's 'Leisure Suit Larry' make it to the top 50? :(

    1. Re:What The? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have to ask? :-)

  70. Re:How Quickly We Forget..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree. I remember the first time i ever saw a gameing console. My neighbor had asked me, "hmmm, so should i get this atari system or go with one of these brand new nintendo things". Heh. There where some fucking awsome games in the arcade.And not just those mano-e-mano fight games.

  71. Their top 10 by jeko · · Score: 1

    1. DOOM
    2. Half-Life
    3. Warcraft 2
    4. Sid Meier's Civilization
    5. Quake
    6. Diablo
    7. Ultima IV: Quest of the Avatar
    8. Ultima Underworld: The Stygian Abyss
    9. Starcraft
    10. Legend of Zelda
    I cannot believe Star Raiders for the Atari 400 did not make the list...

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  72. Re:Super mario 64 shouldn't have made it so high! by Sho0tyz · · Score: 1
    I was thinking the exact same thing. Super Mario 3 was definitely the best Mario game Nintendo has come up with. I didn't like Mario64 much at all.

    But even besides that, the list seemed focused mainly on PC games released in the past 3-4 years. Very few older games, and even fewer console games. I don't think they explored "all time" well enough.

  73. Re:Myst??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    That game sucks. Unless all you want in a game are an exquisite soundtrack, and skillful 3D art. It ranks along with 7th guest, Shit.

    Pure pre-rendered beauty? Obvoisly you do not know the meaning of the word render.

  74. Re:The early games got shafted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The trouble with many naysayers regarding a list like this is that they don't want to compare old game to new games straight up, because they know that the old games will get destroyed technically. "Oh, well, older games had gameplay that today's game don't have," they say. Guess what? The best games ever are the games that are being made today. I'm not saying that the old games weren't good, but come on, today's games blow away the old ones.

    Believe it or not, there ARE games made today that combine the best elements of the old games with today's technology and add stuff that can only be done with today's technology. You want to tell me that Spacewar was a better game than Diablo? Pac-Man than Quake? Give me a break.

  75. Monopolys Rule! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on. We all know the most popular computer game of all time.

    Solitaire.

    Played in millions of office's across the country every day.

  76. The top 50 RPGs/Strats in the last 10 years on PC by robvasquez · · Score: 1

    I guess they never played nintendo or older PC Games.

    Where the fuck was Super mario 3!?

    They just listed all the last few years of RTS's, FPS, they got bribed by advertisers.

  77. Lemmings and Populous2 for the Amiga? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is it on their list?

    Simply the most addictive two player strategy game ever made! Hilarious fun while digging holes and traps for your buddie`s lemmings.

    In my opinion Populous2 was the highlight of Peter Molyneux` respectable career.

  78. Why the bias? by CaseStudy · · Score: 1

    I think the bias results from who they polled. (Yes, this is another stat-heavy post). The developers they list are mostly folks who presumably write those sorts of games themselves. I've never even heard of eGenesis, Shiny Entertainment, Quicksilver Software, Raven Software, Monolith Productions, or Ritual Entertainment.

  79. One more "where is ... post"... by mosburger · · Score: 1

    Ok, I know not to take this thing TOO seriously, but COME ON... I can think of TONS of stuff that should be on the list... - Kings Quest? How could they not include a *single* Sierra game? - Autoduel - Pirates! - RailRoad Tycoon - Elite

  80. Rocket Jockey by Wiwi+Jumbo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't load the pages up, but I'm willing to bet they never included Rocket Jockey.

    This game is just amazing... it's one of the few where it's actually fun to try for a high score after you've finished it.

    More people need to play this. ('Cause I *need* a sequal... ;)

    Check it out: http://www.theunderdogs.org/game.php?name=Rocket+J ockey , tho it's not quite the same without the soundtrack. :)

    --
    Wiwi
    "I trust in my abilities,
    but I want more then they offer"
    1. Re:Rocket Jockey by Wiwi+Jumbo · · Score: 1

      I had the same problem, until I downloaded the cracked version from The Underdogs... then if you install the multiplayer patch you get the full version with CD support as well. I'm loving it. ;)

      --
      Wiwi
      "I trust in my abilities,
      but I want more then they offer"
    2. Re:Rocket Jockey by PYves · · Score: 1

      you need directx 3 and it won't work with my directx 7 :(

      cool game though, I wish I could play

  81. 2 Words: by Mr.+Troll · · Score: 1

    Scorched Earth

    --
    Kiss my shiny metal ass
  82. Probably the most soulless game lists ever ... by x+mani+x · · Score: 2

    While any Top N games of all time list is going to be biased and controversial, it just makes my jaw drop that pretty much no real adventure games were mentioned. Have these guys ever played a Sierra or LucasArts game? You mention modern 3D CPU hog garbage like Asheron's Call, Ultima Online and Deus Ex and you don't mention masterpieces like Maniac Mansion 2, Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, Quest for Glory, Space Quest, King's Quest, LSL, Rise of the Dragon or Monkey Island?

    This list is completely devoid of heart and soul. There were some good picks, like Wing Commander, Starcraft, X-COM and Doom, but generally it appears they have no fucking clue what they're talking about.

    Leave it to a bunch of FPS nerds to fumble this.

    1. Re:Probably the most soulless game lists ever ... by JWhiton · · Score: 1
      So what you're saying is that FPS nerds are bad, but adventure game nerds are good? Did it ever occur to you that your tastes are a wee bit narrow?

      By the way, according to the statistics here, FPS games aren't even as common as RPGs in their top 50.

    2. Re:Probably the most soulless game lists ever ... by CaseStudy · · Score: 1

      By the way, according to the statistics here, FPS games aren't even as common as RPGs in their top 50.

      That's because I counted everything from Diablo to EverQuest to Zelda as an RPG. There were only nine true RPGs in the list, compared to ten true FPSs. But you'd expect there to be more RPGs around, because the genre has been around a lot longer.

    3. Re:Probably the most soulless game lists ever ... by vecna_99 · · Score: 1
      This list is completely devoid of heart and soul. There were some good picks, like Wing Commander, Starcraft, X-COM and Doom, but generally it appears they have no fucking clue what they're talking about.


      well duh. it's fucking Gamespy.

      --
      --- "We also were guided by the unlikelihood that anyone would face supernatural evil armed only with technology."
  83. Yet again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot posts a [Integer between 10 to 50] top games of [genre]/[platform]/ever
    and yet again people posts the same thing, "Why didn't [name of game] isn't on the list"

  84. The true top game is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tetris. Why? Because of how simple it is, and yet how complex it is. Think about when it came out. It was coded by someone who didn't know how to code, really and ended up having MASS MARKET appeal.

    A game like "DOOM" (their top game) does not have mass market appeal. How many girls do you see playing DOOM? How many adults? And then how many girls and adults do you see play Tetris? It's not because of it being advertised, because it came from the commies!

    Tetris represents everything I love in video games; puzzle solving, a bit of action, graphics up to what is needed, getting in and out of your groove. Come on, admit it, how many of you love Tetris?

  85. Re:Tony Hawk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tony Wawk should be in the top ten for sure.. but the whole list is wack anyways.

  86. Re:The early games got shafted by dimator · · Score: 2

    Go play SpaceWar or Pong, and then go play a game like Age of Empires or Civilization. Chances are you'll have a LOT more fun playing the latter.


    I think the point of the original poster was a game's popularity during it's time. Comparing two different era games side-by-side is not conclusive at all in terms of popularity. Whether or not the list endeavors to measure popularity or just "quality" is not clear though...

    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  87. You forgot Leisure Suit Larry!!! by Robber+Baron · · Score: 1

    I don't believe it! Shoulda been in the top 10! Didn't even make the top 50??? Come on!

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

    1. Re:You forgot Leisure Suit Larry!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at least Larry is still alive-- it seems that these guys are working on a PalmOS port of the game, check the last screenshot at the bottom. (Ok, it's Police Quest, but anyone who ports Police Quest should be able to port Larry as well...)

  88. Yeah it sure was one of mine by ynotds · · Score: 1
    But I got more interested in its programmability than simply playing it, and that was a vital part of the way forward for more than just games.

    And even earlier Apple Panic which I even became pretty good at, at least relative to the younger gamers who hang out at our place.

    Guess this is as good a place as any to hide my top five (which is as far as I can seriously get):

    1. Adventure (Colossal Cave)
    2. Tetris (the only one that made their list)
    3. FreeCell (the Linux version)
    4. Apple Panic
    5. Lode Runner
    But I do recognise that some others were in that "significant" catgeory that appeals to us oldtimers, some of which I used to enjoy watching over shoulders, but this shouldn't be in any order:
    • Space Invaders/Asteroids
    • PacMan
    • Myst
    • Pong
    • The Sims
    I have also enjoyed Chess, Scrabble and even Monoply which are amongst the many traditional games that survive the transition rather well.
    --
    -- Our systemic servants do not good masters make.
  89. No Goonies II? by shadowcabbit · · Score: 1

    How exactly could GameSpy forget to put this game on the list? I mean, the Goonies II was obviously the game that inspired Konami to work on Castlevania: SOTN (yeah, so they did take a bit from Metroid, too, but that's not on the list either).
    Come to think of it, I'm noticing a distinct anti-console slant. Consoles have had an extremely large role in promoting and boosting video gaming in the past ten years, IMO.

    --
    "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
    1. Re:No Goonies II? by shadowcabbit · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. Super Metroid is on the list. Please don't flame me.

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
  90. Hmph. by Legion303 · · Score: 1
    Lots of people bitching over the list, I notice. Of course it's going to be arbitrary--these games are what the article's authors consider the best games ever (assuming they haven't been swayed by advertising dollars), and that isn't going to match what *you* consider the best games ever. Instead of bitching, post your favorites. Here are mine, in semi-random order:

    Secret of Mana (SNES): Probably my favorite RPG of all time.

    Legend of the Red Dragon (BBS door): Oh yeah. Addictive as hell.

    Torment: Planescape (PC): One of the most immersive and powerful games I've ever played. As soon as I finished (40+ hours of play) I wanted to start over again.

    Solstice (NES): Puzzle games never seemed as addictive as this one.

    Super Mario Bros. 3 (NES): My favorite SMB game.

    Doom II (PC): Most fun I've ever had in network deathmatches.

    Unreal (PC): Simply revolutionary.

    Drol (Apple ][e): Anyone else remember this one?

    Bard's Tale 2 (Apple ][e): Sadly, I never played the first one.

    Star Control 2 (3DO): One of my all-time favorites on any platform, though the 3DO version was the best.

    The Wing Commander series (PC): Simplistic gameplay, but incredibly addictive anyway.

    Super Metroid (SNES): One of the five or so SNES games I still play regularly.

    Crystal Castles (Arcade): That bear rocked.

    It Came from the Desert (Amiga): Atmospheric, spooky and awesome.

    Star Wars (Arcade): You sit down in the cabinet and fly an X-Wing. What more could you want? Speaking of which...

    X-Wing Vs. Tie Fighter (PC): Sucked up all my time.

    The Bomberman series (lots of platforms): Consistently fun on every platform.

    Ecco the Dolphin (Genesis): Revolutionary for its time.

    Combat (Atari 2600): Fun and addictive, blocky graphics notwithstanding.

    Samurai Shodown (Neo Geo): The best of the crop of sword fighting games at the time.

    Tekken 2 (PSX): Still loads of fun to this day--something I can't say for Mortal Kombat 2.

    Lemmings (many platforms): They're all good.

    Silent Hill (PSX): This game had me *afraid* to play in the dark, at age 29. And I don't spook easily. That's the game's saving grace, as it's far too short--I hope SH2 will be much longer and more involved.

    Alone in the Dark (PC): This was another revolutionary, spooky game.

    I've doubtless forgotten a great many games here. If you don't agree with me, don't sweat it--they're only opinions.

    -Legion

    1. Re:Hmph. by cowdeth · · Score: 1

      shit...forgot about alone in the dark! that game owned. and still does. how the hell do you get dos games to work right in win2k?

      --
      what?
  91. Re:Disgusting by tdelaney · · Score: 1

    Heh. Guess I added a bit more than I was intending to ... ;)

  92. Re:The early games got shafted by polar+red · · Score: 1

    Good point, but nowadays there aren't any games anymore that are so good that they keep you addicted for more than a few months. The technology used in new games is great, and they blow the old games away in that respect, but WHERE IS THE FUN GONE ?

    --
    Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
  93. Some statistics by CaseStudy · · Score: 5, Informative

    With any top 50 list, someone's going to complain that games weren't included or were overrated. I think this one's pretty bad, though.

    A breakdown by game type:

    • Adventure/Interactive Fiction - 39 (but no Sierra games or Myst)
    • Action - 1, 2, 5, 11, 12, 13, 18, 24, 29, 30, 32, 38, 40, 44, 46, 47 (but no Pacman or Pong)
      • Fighting - 30 (but no Mortal Kombat)
      • FPS - 1, 2, 5, 12, 13, 18, 24, 29, 32, 38, 40, 44, 47 (but no Castle Wolfenstein)
      • Platform - 11, 20, 46 (but no Super Mario Bros.)
    • Console - 10, 11, 20, 28, 38, 48 (but no Super Mario Bros.)
    • Flight Sim - 34 (but no Falcon or X-Wing)
    • Hybrid - 26, 35 (but no Starflight)
    • Puzzle - 19 (but no Fool's Errand)
    • RPG - 6, 7, 8, 10, 15, 17, 21, 23, 27, 28, 36, 37, 41, 42, 43, 45, 48 (but no Fallout or Ultima 7)
      • Console RPG - 28, 48 (but no late Final Fantasys)
      • Online RPG - 15, 27, 48 (but no MUDs)
    • Simulation - 33 (but not The Sims)
    • Sports - none at all
    • Strategy - 3, 4, 9, 14, 16, 22, 25, 31, 35, 50 (but no Master of Orion)
      • 4X - 4, 22 (but no Master of Orion, Alpha Centauri)
      • RTS - 3, 9, 14, 16, 31, 50 (but no Dune)
      • Wargame - 49

    Statistics by year:

    • 1981 - 21
    • 1982 - 39
    • 1983 - 25, 41
    • 1985 - 7, 17
    • 1986 - 10, 19
    • 1987 - 49
    • 1988 - 42
    • 1990 - 34
    • 1991 - 4, 30
    • 1992 - 8, 26, 28
    • 1994 - 1, 23, 24, 35, 44, 46
    • 1995 - 3, 31
    • 1996 - 5, 6, 11, 13, 22
    • 1997 - 14, 20, 38, 47, 48, 50
    • 1998 - 2, 9, 36, 40, 43
    • 1999 - 12, 15, 16, 27, 45
    • 2000 - 18, 29, 37

    Just from those numbers, we'd expect the highest-rated games to be first-person shooters based in the mid-nineties (Doom, Quake), and the lowest-rated games to be sports games based in the late eighties (Earl Weaver Baseball).

  94. Re:Disgusting by Quinn · · Score: 1

    Any top list without Wasteland on it is completely and totally worthless. The absence of Fallout is perhaps even worse, considering the twerps running the site should have been out of short pants when it came out.

    I spent years playing Wasteland. I even cracked it out in the late 90's and ran with it for a few weeks to push up to Supreme Jerk rank.

    Obviously the people who wrote the list have no knowledge of gaming history beyond gleaning the best of screenshots from those before them.

    --
    #19845
  95. Super Metroid -- SNES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd have to say the most kickass and positively scary console game of all time has to be Super Metroid for SNES. At the same time, the Megaman, Dragon Warrior and Castlevania series on NES were probably the best console series I've ever played.

    ICEPHREAK

  96. donno don't care by isudoru · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    quake forever and blah blah blah.... ooh, whats this? halflife?

    --

    ----
    "I believe in karma. That means I can do bad things to people and assume they deserve it" - Dogbert
  97. what they got right ... and wrong by thopo · · Score: 1

    Ok i really hoped that DOOM would be #1 and then i clicked the link and there .. there .. there is DOOM! Excellent. Everyone knows this game or at least has heard sth. about it and back in the days everyone played it. So congratulations on a wise choice.

    But i noticed sth. else: Why is Diablo f.e. #6 and Legend of Zelda only #10. Zelda is probably the best game series EVER and everyone now in his twenties should get a fuzzy feeling when he looks back.
    I think they made the mistake to compare the games with their actual play/fun value. They should have compared them on the play/fun value they had while they came out. And here you can clearly see that Zelda was far more popular and fun then Diablo was (and Zelda is probably even more fun today - this can be argued).

    --
    keep it simple.
    1. Re:what they got right ... and wrong by PM4RK5 · · Score: 1

      Exactly; I would have to agree. Zelda is indeed one of the best RPG series for the Nintendo series of console systems. Of all the N64 games I own, I would have to say that Zelda 64 and Goldeneye are by far my favorite two. I think that both Goldeneye and Zelda 64 were done terrible injustice being so far down on the list. They both contained extremely intricate plots, wonderful graphics, and were very entertaining, both contained in less than 32MB of hard code and up to 4MB of RAM. And also on a 93.25 MHz processor. Quake 3 couldn't run on that, now could it? Neither should have been #1, for sure, but they could have at least placed them higher than 43rd and 38th.

      Thats just my $0.02

  98. Re:The early games got shafted by jayhawk88 · · Score: 1

    Go play SpaceWar or Pong, and then go play a game like Age of Empires or Civilization. Chances are you'll have a LOT more fun playing the latter.

    You could make a case for Space Invaders or Asteroids needing to make the list, I'll agree. Some of those first games are revolutioniary, but not necessarily some of the greatest games, IMHO.

  99. Re:The early games got shafted by Kupek · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Well no shit you're not going to recognize the games if you don't play them anymore. If there was a "Top 50 Greatest Basketball Players of All Time" list, and you don't follow basketball, would you expect to recognize everyone on the list?

    I'd also like to point out there is a big difference between the greatest games of all time, and the most influential games of all time. A list of the influential games will likely have the games you're listing.

  100. Sierra On-Line! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    At least some of the early AGI and SCI games should be in the list: Larry 1 & 3, Space Quest II, Quest for Glory I are real classics.

    And 3D Monster Maze for the ZX-81, of course.

  101. Re:Super mario 64 shouldn't have made it so high! by analog_line · · Score: 1

    Super Mario 64 shouldn't have even been on the list. Super Mario 3 should've taken it's place. Now there was a platform game.

  102. The need to rank. by KahunaBurger · · Score: 2
    These lists always drive me crazy. Why, oh why, do people have this need to not just pick out the good stuff, not even try for the best stuff, but try to rank everything in a strict, linear order and claim they have determined the "absolute best" as if it is now some sort of objective reality? WHY?

    Enjoyment of video games is a completely subjective expereince. Different people put together different lists. You can either have a list from the perspective of one type of gamer that everyone else will disagree with, or you can poll a lot of different people and come up with a list EVERYONE will disagree with. Whats the point?

    Why not just get some friends together and say "these are the games we liked in alphebetical order and why we liked them"? Its a subjective list, why drape it in a poor imitation of objectivity through numerical ranking?

    Kahuna Burger

    --
    ...will work for Chick tracts...
  103. Re:Disgusting by tdelaney · · Score: 1

    Not a lot to add to this, except that I found it pretty disturbing that Fallout (RPG of the Year) and Fallout 2 (runner-up to Baldur's Gate on most lists) were missing from the list. Although I was gratified to see that Fallout and Wasteland tied on one developer's list.

    They gave the credit for the RPG revival to Baldur's Gate and Diablo! The RPG revival definitely came with Fallout. Baldur's Gate was a welcome addition in the following year (or was it the year after?) but I don't think I've played it more than twice. OTOH, I have played both Fallout and Fallout 2 well over 30 times each - and I *still* discover new things occasionally. They are the only two games I immediately install whenever I rebuild my main Windows machine (it's due for another rebuild this week ...).

    Diablo created a new genre - isometric action games - but IMO it is no way a contributor to the CRPG genre. I had a lot of fun with Diablo, but I never considered it to contribute anything to the CRPG genre. BTW, it took me ages to force myself through Diablo 2 on easy, and won't be playing it ever again.

    In many cases, this list appeared to be based on quantity (of sales) more than quality (although I could be wrong - my opinions differ greatly to most gamers in that I only tend to play CRPG or adventure games - I *never* play first-person shooters). I agree that Doom definitely deserves to be towards the top of the list, as it popularised an entirely new genre (however, what about Wolfenstein?) but whether it should be #1 is personal opinion.

    I would truly like to know what criteria were used to determine this list. Surely it should be "what games have you played the greatest number of times (including getting a long way, giving up, and starting over because you did something not quite right)?".

    For me, the list goes something like:

    1. Fallout 1 & 2. FO1 had the better story, but FO2 improved gameplay. I can't decide.

    2. Angband.

    3. Moria.

    4. NetHack.

    5. Elite. Where the hell was this??? Why can't any space-sim match this game??? Never got to Elite though - highest I got was Deadly.

    6. Pretty much everything else. Most games get played through at most once or twice.

  104. Super mario 64 shouldn't have made it so high! by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 1

    It was a decent game but if you look at some of the limited hardware the others had to work with, I'd say they outrank it. FF3 and Tetris should have been much higher IMHO.

    Besides, where are Mighty Bomb Jack and Star Voyager?

    I wish there was a place I could download all the old games that are no longer in print.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:Super mario 64 shouldn't have made it so high! by WoefullyFat · · Score: 1

      A lot of people get games from www.theunderdogs.org. I don't, though, because it's illegal! :-)

      --
      Today is a good day to die. They all are, though.
  105. Bah! Where are Pacman? Asteroids? Missile Command? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    They skipped the real classics that made billions of dollars in arcades everywhere. And I didn't see any games before 1981. Guess games didn't exist before the IBM PC. How could they? Also, they seemed not to want to mention the 'A' word (Atari). They even showed a picture of Atari's arcade Tetris and claimed it was released by Spectrum Holobyte?!

    Damned revisionist basterds[sic].

  106. My pick by sjhs · · Score: 0

    moon-buggy is the best game ever!

  107. Re:Bias by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
    I saw a little bias towards first-person shooters here.

    A *little* bias? Gimmie a break - these guys have the same tastes that I do (RPG and RTS), but there is a serious bias evident even to me. Plus a bias in terms of era of game play. You can see when the reviewers got into games, and what shaped their opinions.

    Incidently, it doesn't include arcade games or early pre-PC games. Besides the easy Pac-Man Defender and Dig Dug, I'd have to toss a few into the hat like the friggin' incredible Below the Root (Beneath the Root?), Rescue Rangers (that was the choplifter where you built an army, right?), Apple Panic (okay, I'm starting to date myself), Epoch (damn, that was an addictive game), MULE (Ok, I didn't like it, but it was a classic), and Jumpman (no, not Jumpman VGA, the original C64 version).

    Of course, they might have reasons (like a cut off date or something), but since I can't read the article...

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  108. Mario Kart???? by max_power26 · · Score: 1

    This list is really biased towards action games. You can tell because they left Mario Kart (Super or 64) out of the list all together. I'm not sayinbg its the best game ever but its pretty damn sweet. Maybe they don't have great graphics and stuff like that but even after I got 007 on the 64 (which does make the list...and deserves to) I think I still have played Kart much more.

    --
    King Arthur: Are all men from the future loud-mouthed braggarts? Ash: Nope. Just me baby... Just me.
  109. Where is Descent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Descent 3 in particular, when played with a joystick with a hat, is the slickest 3D experience ever. Being a physics geek myself, I always appreciated how they went out of their way to be accurate about inertia and momentum.

  110. They missed the best video game ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't belive Game Derby didn't make it into that list. I guess it's too underground :(

    Game Derby was really well done, especially the Top Secret Robots part. While the graphics are a self parody, which isn't "cool" like blood and guts, the actualy *GAME* part of Top Secret Robots is out of this world! I'm really saddened they overlooked this top game just because it wasn't violent enough.

  111. huzzah for this list by cowdeth · · Score: 1

    I've noticed, over time, that any list that gets produced by any source (ie PC Gamer, Gamecenter, etc) usually contains many of the same games in it. I must say, though, I wholly agree with many of the games included in the list... but why wasn't UT on it? Ultima Underworld was on the top ten. Huzzah. Where can I find copies of some of those older games on the list, ie the bard's tale?

    --
    what?
  112. You're right. by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 1

    If I had to sit down and choose between a Diablo and Zelda. I'd pick Zelda in a heartbeat.

    At least the first three Zelda's. I never got into the new n64 zeldas. They were too slow paced for me. Maybe I just never gave them a chance.

    Somewhere on the net there is even a 3rd quest rendition someone did by hacking the original NES rom. They did a good job too. It's really fun.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  113. Pirates or Dune 2? by gamorck · · Score: 0

    Where was Pirates on that list? That game is a masterpiece that has yet to be cloned. Not only that but the game existed on a HUGE number of platforms (Amiga, C64, PC, NES, Genesis). Im disappointed.

    Not to mention - where the hell was Dune 2? I mean that game STARTED the RTS genre. I played that game for a LONG LONG time.

    You gotta love it when newer gamers make their top whatever lists. They really leave alot out. Of course - I think its great that Zork made the list. And one more thing - where the hell were the sierra adventure games?

    Gam
    "Flame at Will"

    --
    I love idealists not because I am one, but because they make life bearable for pragmatists such as myself.
  114. No Myst and no Sierra Online _ Quest games by Nelson · · Score: 1
    I scanned the list kind of quick but did I miss those?


    There wasn't a lot on there that I thought shouldn't be, just the placement was a little screwy but I honestly don't see how you can have StarCraft and WarCraft in the top 20 and not have Myst or Rivan or a Sierra game like King's Quest. That was hugely revolutionary shit when it came out. In PC land I would say it was probably the most revolutionary game until around the time tetris showed up.

  115. Re:How Quickly We Forget.....IP Black Hole. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I will be surprised to still see Zork on future lists, as well - not because it doesn't deserve to be there, but because game developers will have lost that much more of their history, or never even been introduced to it."

    And with the present state of companies,IP rights, and old games, as well as emulators. There will be a great deal more that will be forgotten before it's over.

  116. MOO2 by Magius_AR · · Score: 1
    I just can't respect any top 50 gaming list that doesn't include MOO2 (Master of Orion 2) SOMEWHERE in that listing. I mean, come on, that game was just _great_, definitely one of the "definitive" games of history.

    Magius_AR

  117. phantasy star 2? by CoreyG · · Score: 1

    How they could have ignored this game is beyond me. Play it every day for an hour and it will take 2 years to win. The game was sold bundled with a guide. It was sold like that in stores that didn't even sell guides to begin with. I still haven't beaten it. Never have I been taken in by a game with such a great story. The background, the detail, the plot, the expansive world. I'll have to buy the smashpack for DC just to play it again.

  118. Civilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And I don't know how much time I spent on Ultima II. (Or was it III? The one where you start out using horses and buggies, and by the end of the game technology has advanced to the point where you actually have to use a space shuttle to go out in space and do something to win the game, although I forget exactly what.)

    You're probably thinking of Civilization, which was never available for the Apple II.

    1. Re:Civilization by sunhou · · Score: 1
      You're probably thinking of Civilization, which was never available for the Apple II.

      Nope, I never played Civilization. Someone else pointed out I was remembering the very first Ultima. I've still got it (and my Apple) somewhere in my parents' basement, maybe one of these days I'll drag it out again.

      But I'm still hoping someone will remember, what the heck did you have to use that space shuttle for?

    2. Re:Civilization by Angry+Toad · · Score: 1

      Really, it's not like I'm an Ultima I fanatic or anything, but I managed to find this after searching a bit:

      You have been exploring the four continents of Ultima, crossing plains and oceans, and increasing your attributes and possessions. Suddenly, you find advanced weapons, armour, and vehicles in the cities. Purchase a space shuttle as soon as you have enough gold. The shuttle will carry you out into space where you will strive to destroy 20 enemy vessels. If you do this, you will be designated a "Space Ace". You will want to be a Space Ace before rescuing the princess. If you destroy the enemy spacecraft, and return alive to Ultima, you will have gained thousands of experience points and will be ready to save the Princess. Space movement can be tricky, and the following strategy hints should help:

  119. Bias by worldwideweber · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I saw a little bias towards first-person shooters here. Personally, I am willing to admit that one first-person shooter should have been on the list, but that many on the top 10?

    Also, not a single sports game on the list? I think any tennis game (or its simple predecessor PONG) should have been given a nod.

    And ZELDA is the best game ever :) !

    --
    w o r l d w i d e w e b e r
    1. Re:Bias by frknfrk · · Score: 2

      RBI baseball is the best NES game ever :) Actually what is really funny is that my wife is in the other room playing ZELDA right now. I'm so glad I've kept my NES in good shape. Zelda, Super Mario 3, and RBI baseball get more playtime than my Playstation. Somehow all the 'neato graphics' lose a lot of ground on playability. Cool graphics can take you a long way, but if the gameplay sucks...

      --
      The REAL sam_at_caveman_dot_org is user ID 13833.
    2. Re:Bias by Ziffy · · Score: 1
      Cool graphics can take you a long way, but if the gameplay sucks...

      You, my good sir, are entirely correct.

      After all, they missed two of the best games of all time: ZZT and Exile. ZZT was especially cool, because it had an overhead view, ran in text mode, and was easy to make good worlds for :)

    3. Re:Bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, all of 2 first person shooters in the top 10. Maybe you should try some of those games before commenting.

    4. Re:Bias by Charm · · Score: 1

      Have a look out for a game called Armour Alley it's bascically the same I think but with serial play for up to four players.

      --
      -- RTFM:Slackware::Beer:Saturday
  120. My favorite game... denied! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    My favorite game is where I douse my wang in napalm, light it, and anally violate Cowboy Neal.

    1. Re:My favorite game... denied! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you only get one shot at that game.

  121. Bubble Bobble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on... Everybody knows that Bubble Bobble is by far one of the greatest games /ever/.

    1. Re:Bubble Bobble by diamondc · · Score: 1
      haha, i know.. the most fun i had as a kid was going to the local arcade and teaming up with my friend on bubble bobble and being almost like local Gods for getting to level 100 with one quarter.

      and like the poster above.. they didnt list super mario bros. 3 which lived up to the hype (remember The Wizard??) and then some.

      --
      "I keep looking in the want-ads under 'revolutionary' but there don't seem to be any listings.. "
  122. Obviously biased by beri-beri · · Score: 1


    This top accounts only for a part of games genres. Important ones are absolutely forgotten. In any list like that Microsoft Flight Simulator has to be there. Not that I like it, but it's just a game with a HUGE following. Simulation is basically not represented. What, Wing Commander is a Simulator? The Falcon series, Silent Hunter should have been there.

    What about card games? Do you know how many people play those? What about Chess games? Nothing there about that. Thei "top 50" is pretty useless.

    1. Re: Obviously biased by brainy · · Score: 0

      I got into MSFS with 5.0 for DOS. I eventually got MSFS95, but nothing since. I know that there's a 98, and maybe even a newer version. And there's an entire community of FS players out there, creating planes, creating scenery, creating other add-ons. I think there's even a air traffic control add-on...you link up over the net with other players, and someone acts as the ATC. Plus, MSFS spawned several others (Pro Pilot comes to mind), plus the FS games of the military stream. It's huge.

  123. Another list... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oids Sundog Dungeon Master Lord of Doomdark Civ Mule Super Mario Kart Fallout Elite Paradroid Star Raiders Adventure VCS Atic Atak and on and on and on... The only good thing about these lists is that they remind me what games I need to emulate next!

  124. Re:Bah! Where are Pacman? Asteroids? Missile Comma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yes, Asteroids was the first game to track high scores and let players assign their initials to them, and to think up many ways to fit profanity into three letters. Get the number 1 and number 2 spots to be able to write longer messages. And if you get #2 but can't reach the top scorer, you enter "SUX" so that everyone can see that the number one player "sucks". Heh.

    And missile command had something kids who never experienced the cold war just miss. Maybe Bush's "missile defense" program will bring this game back some ways into the mainstream. The spooky part was that on the higher levels it is impossible to defent all 6 cities. So what do you do? Defend the one city nearest to the middle base and let the others get blown away. Which is probably what would happen in real life.

    As for Pac Man... the first game popular among GIRLS! Something which modern games STILL fail to address. The cute graphics seemed to attract more girls than to any other video game.

    I would also add Dragon's Lair. The first game that minimized gameplay and turned games into a sequence of FMV clips. The "gameplay" was just an annoying interlude. In this respect DL was waaaaaaaaaay ahead of its time. It failed then, but today games like this succeed.

  125. So very wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it just me, or did they obviously favour PC games? For starters, Final Fantasy 3 is #1, Crono Trigger and Secret of mana should be top 10. I didn't see pacmam nor did I burger time. This is a sad day for gaming it is.

  126. nethack, manic miner, bubble bobble..... by MartinG · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... to name but a few.

    Where are they?

    That list looked more to me like the best games in the last 10 years, not of all time.

    --
    -- MartinG To mail me: echo kewyjlcxyzvjfxbqwh | tr bcefhjklqvwxyz .@adgimnoprstu
    1. Re:nethack, manic miner, bubble bobble..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good call, these were the 3 games that whittled away my childhood....and also WizBall for the C64 if you ever played it.

  127. Re:The early games got shafted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah. I went throught the list, with growing incredulity.

    Where the fuck is LODE RUNNER ?

    Cheers,

    --fred

  128. The early games got shafted by localroger · · Score: 5, Insightful
    WHERE THE HELL IS PONG? Where are the Atari 2600 games?

    How can you name fifty games no less without mentioning some of the originals that invented the form? This list reads like a list of the "50 greatest songs of all time" all of which were recorded since 1960.

    Despite a couple of nods toward the C64 and Apple ][, this list is hopelessly 90's-oriented. "All-time" indeed! Where are...

    • SPACEWAR, the first video game EVER
    • PONG, PONG, PONG, and PONG variants like BREAKOUT, the first home video games EVER
    • TANK WAR for the 2600, still holds its own with any modern game for quick 2-person play
    • BATTLEZONE, first first-person 3d game EVER
    • SPACE INVADERS, ASTEROIDS, each owned the world for a couple of years
    Meanwhile I've never even heard of some of the games they nominated. Then again, I'm not a "gamer" any more -- guess I got it out of my system when we were still carving video games out of wooden blocks.
    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
    1. Re:The early games got shafted by mmaddox · · Score: 2

      Of course, I disagree with the idea that Final Fantasy is a game. A game involves strategic decision, with tradeoffs and non-linear development. Final Fantasy is a single plot-line, interspersed with puzzles and button-mashing. You're simply rewarded for pushing the right buttons with a little more of the story. Not that FF is not fun, it's just not a game, but an interactive movie in its current iteration.

      Read Game Architecture and Design and see if you agree. I think we've lost sight of gaming with the advent of the interactive movie. That's why I stick to real, old-fashioned wargaming.

      --

      What'dya mean there's no BLINK tag!?

    2. Re:The early games got shafted by polar+red · · Score: 1

      Not entirely : playing Monkey island 4 this winter, I had a lot of fun, which was a long time ago. In the older days, games made up for what they lacked technically by good thinking : improving playability, improving funfactor ... Nowadays gamedesigners think that they can make a good game by just trowing in some extra effects.

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    3. Re:The early games got shafted by mmaddox · · Score: 2

      Right. Strategy. It's nothing more than a walk, click, walk, click. If you mess up, re-load your saved game and try to click right this time. Phbbbbbt!

      Of course, maybe I'm just being difficult. :)

      --

      What'dya mean there's no BLINK tag!?

    4. Re:The early games got shafted by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Well, YOU might not think the new games are fun, but I don't think the OLD games are fun. Most old arcade games are nothing more than reflex tests, and my reflexes aren't that great. Some might say that all POV shooters are the same. This is no more true than saying all side-scrollers are the same! Come on...is Lode Runner the same as Metroid? Is either the same as Contra? People who don't see variety in the game market nowadays aren't looking hard enough. Just 'cuz it happens to be 3D doesn't mean that there's no game there.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    5. Re:The early games got shafted by Zalgon+26+McGee · · Score: 1
      BATTLEZONE, first first-person 3d game EVER

      When was Battlezone released? Doug Neubauer's Star Raiders for the Atari 400/800 was released in 1979 - and it has (more or less) first person 3d.

      --

      ---

      Book(n): Utensil used to pass time while waiting for the TV repairman

    6. Re:The early games got shafted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yer full of shit.

      Diablo 2, considering the various reviews given this game when it came out, hardly warrants inclusion on this list.

      Ultima Online is on this list? This game was trashed as much as Daikatana.

      There are no sports titles on this list, no driving titles on this list. Pole position? Stunts? Need for Speed?

      Super Mario 64 is on this list but not Super Mario Brothers, the original one which is how Nintendo got known as a console company in the first place?

      Counterstrike on this list is like Nsync on a top 100 artists of all time list.

    7. Re:The early games got shafted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Todays games aren't really any better. The only one that i would say is a classic that's new is probably Theif. Maybe Baldur's Gate. People that say the old games suck didn't play them when they where new obviously. Just wait. Ten years from now when someone leaves diablo off the list all the "I just started gameing in the mid-90s" teenybops can cry. Alot of the games being made today are not that good. Sure the graphics are flashy, but a fun game that does not make. People that don't like the old games probably played them in some emulator on a p3-733 and then deleted it after 10 minutes and went back to playing what ever 3d shooter is "in" at the moment.

    8. Re:The early games got shafted by Lac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd also like to point out there is a big difference between the greatest games of all time, and the most influential games of all time. A list of the influential games will likely have the games you're listing.

      I'm posting late so I will get ignored, but...

      You are sadly missing the point that many of the games he mentions were great. Case in point: Pong. I play way too much video games and have been groosly interested in the topic for quite a while. And you are sadly mistaken to gloss over Pong. Pong is an amazing game in its own right. It is amazingly simple, but so is soccer when you think about it. And Pong has something that almost no other game has: it is perfect.

      Think about it. Think about the games you love. Any one of them could be improved upon: better AI, more balanced weapons, better thought-out multi-player, smoother game-play, more involving story-line, etc. None of this applies to pong. You could implement AI for it and Pong would gain 0 appeal. The same goes for the graphics. If they were better, they wouldn't be perfect. The original graphics are perfect because they are simple, effective and don't matter.

      Readers will think I am being funny. I am. But I truely believe what I just said: Pong is quite possibly the only perfect game in videogame history. (And in any case, how could a not-so-great gane become one of the most influential ever? Hogwash.)

    9. Re:The early games got shafted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect much of it is where it always was. We just got older.

    10. Re:The early games got shafted by Kupek · · Score: 2
      You think Pong is great. I think it's just mindless fun.

      Also, if you're ever in the position to compare Pong to Final Fantasy VI, you know you're doing something wrong. They're both videogames, but they're entirely different in design and intent. Nobody does this with movies (compare movies from different genres), I guess people just do it with games because it's a younger industry, and much more of a niche.

    11. Re:The early games got shafted by Lac · · Score: 1

      You think Pong is great. I think it's just mindless fun.

      Did I ever say it wasn't? Many fun games are mindless fun... Now we do disagree on Pong's greatness, but note that I actually provided arguments to back my opinion. :-) Understandable. One of Pong's strengths is that there is not much you can say against it other than a variation of "I don't like it". What are you to complain about? The plot? Voice acting?

      I fully agree however with your second paragraph: some games are not really comparable.

    12. Re:The early games got shafted by Kupek · · Score: 2

      Alright, I don't think Pong is "great" because to me, games that are "great" have something in them that emotionaly move me. I very much enjoy console RPGs, and although I enjoy many games from other genres, I have the most attachment to RPGs I've played. To me, for a game to be great, it has to be more than just fun.

    13. Re:The early games got shafted by Kupek · · Score: 2
      It's a game alright. The battles require strategy. If you can't see that, I think you're being either elitist or difficult. And like I said, there is exploration involved.

      Pick up Final Fantasy Tactics, now that it's a Greatest Hits title for the PS (ugly green bar on the side, but it's only $20). It's essentialy souped-up chess. (Actually don't pick it up yet; they fucked up and the current press doesn't work.)

    14. Re:The early games got shafted by Morbid+Curiosity · · Score: 1
      BATTLEZONE, first first-person 3d game EVER...

      Er, no. Battlezone came out in 1983. I played first-person 3D games on my TRS-80 earlier than that. Not at the level of graphical sophistication that Battlezone had, but both "3D" and "first person" all the same.

      *sigh* Does anyone here remember Asylum at all? I'm starting to feel old.

      I'm glad Ultima IV was up there, but Zork certainly rated better than No. 39, for me.

  129. Don't you mean Rescue Raiders ? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

    > Rescue Rangers (that was the choplifter where you built an army, right?),

    On the Apple ][ it was called: Rescue Raiders

    Easter eggs can be found here:
    http://www.gamewinners.com/apple_ii/RescueRaiders. htm

    There's even an open source clone !
    http://216.254.0.2/~morse/copter-commander/

    Cheers

  130. Full Throttle! by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 2

    Full Throttle. Yep. Full Throttle. It was yet another story board adventure game from Lucasarts. The art and the music gave it a distinctive style that I wish they'd developed further. Here's webpage about it.

    I got it up and running a while back because I remembered it so fondly, only to realize how amazingly short the game was. It was pretty easy, because even after a few years, I could still remember how to solve the puzzles. There's almost no replay value, which I guess fits its lack of popularity. It's really just like watching a really cool cartoon. You can watch it once but after that it's tedious. For that matter, I wish they had made it into a cartoon. It'd be one kick ass cartoon.

  131. What about the Mac? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any hope for some of these titles to make it to the Mac platform?

  132. another glaring omition by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

    where's King's Quest? Not even in the top 50?

    Even most of the (numerous) sequels were weaker than the original, it did spawn countless imitators, and kept me stuck on my old Apple IIc many frustrated nights while I realized I shouldnt have stabbed the goat back there.

    -J5K

    --
    The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
  133. Re:A crime! by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

    Spaceward Ho! (4.0) and Pax Imperia on the Mac (years before the 2.0 PC version) left "hot" PC games like Master of Orion so far in the dust it's not even funny.

    I once had a bug on Pax Imperia where the population on my planet warped around somehow, and poof! I had 600 billion people or something on that one planet. Yeah, they weren't doing too well, but just a little tax on them and I could pop out fleets of up-to-date dreadnaughts and clear wide swaths through the galaxy.

    --
    I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  134. Fifa Soccer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And Linux developers are too lame to port it.

  135. idkfa by Lawrence+Ho · · Score: 1

    I prefer playing DOOM to Quake any day...
    At least I don't have to bother with vertical aiming ;-)

    1. Re:idkfa by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      I hope you enjoyed Doom III, AKA Quake II.

      Doom = space marine against aliens = boring, for me.

      Quake = space marine against mystical monsters = fun (= "Oh, like that's a competition, you with a machine gun vs. a guy in armor with a sword," said my colleague.)

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  136. Re:Did I miss Unreal Tournament? by NonSequor · · Score: 1

    I believe that an old Penny Arcade strip is applicable here. http://www.penny-arcade.com/dogs.shtml

    --
    My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
  137. When did TIME start?! by The_Weevil · · Score: 1

    If those are the top 50 games of all time I must be missing something. Where is lemmings, where is Elite, where is Grim Fandango or any lucasarts adventure (those are fantastic works)....

    I may be opinionated, but I know that at least one of the above games should be in that chart. Elite should probably be in the top ten, it being one of the most popular games ever.

    I do agree with DOOM being number 1 though, that was a fantastic game :)

    Weevil

    --
    ghaa.
  138. I liked the list... by stikves · · Score: 1
    Everybody says this and that game should have made the list. Even I want some (leemings, tim, sokoban) of them.

    But, who cares? The games in the list are good, and the #1 is definately the #1!

    (By the way, I still prefer DOOM to "anything" else over LAN)

  139. No Might and Magic by Synn · · Score: 1

    Where's Might and Magic, or the best space game of all time, Elite?

  140. Disgusting by Anomaly+Coward · · Score: 1

    They put both Baldur's Gate 1 and 2 in their list, but no mention of either Fallout. That list is absolutely worthless.

  141. NO SUPER MARIO 64 had to get first place even... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a mario fan so I think u can understand that when I say something about it I'm not kidding super mario bros 3 is a nice game it is very very good but it is not the REVOLUTION which SM64 in it's time was, it was the first 3D game which made real virtual worlds and between it is more funny then SMB3 , what makes me really lough is that Doom is on place 1 hehe but I think if all think like u it is sure something normal...

  142. first game I ever played.... by nettdata · · Score: 1

    ...is still one of the best, as far as I'm concerned.

    Lode Runner, on my Dad's Apple ][e ... as a matter of fact, I used to play it so much (monochrome green screen and all) that I used to have nightmares about being burried alive in stone.

    Never mind it was played on a computer that didn't have a hard drive. :)

    --



    $0.02 (CDN)
  143. Did I miss Unreal Tournament? by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 3, Informative

    I didn't see Unreal at all. I haven't had much experience with quake and half life but Unreal and Unreal Tournament were pretty awesome games in my opinion. The first unreal inspired me to buy a voodoo2 and UT inspired me to buy an athlon and a GeForce and a T1.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:Did I miss Unreal Tournament? by Wiwi+Jumbo · · Score: 1

      Too true.... UT upped FPS's in many ways. Epic made a well rounded "game", not just a bunch of levels strung together...

      --
      Wiwi
      "I trust in my abilities,
      but I want more then they offer"
  144. Re:FIST post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >First post's on weekends don't count.

    No need for the apostrophe in the word "posts" in that sentence.

    :-)

  145. Re:They forgot Tradewars. And how Tetris that low? by bugg · · Score: 2
    Pfft, Barren Realms Elite was much better than Tradewars :) I still terribly miss BRE. I'm talking to a few of my classmates here at CMU this summer, and we may do something about this problem...

    I think another title that they're missing is ZZT- the first game with a level editor, and it was so damn engrossing... I truly loved ZZT in every way.

    --
    -bugg
  146. Starflight! How could they miss Starflight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I feel truly bad for anyone who missed Starflight. Today, it's probably almost unplayable because of the dated graphics, but oh, when I played that game, I was completely immersed. Starflight still has fan pages out there to this day, and even has a fan sequel project in the works.

  147. Sierra's Quest games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really thought that Some of the Space Quest, King's Quest and Quest for Glory games should have made that list, but I didn't see a single on one there.

  148. They missed the best one... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

    3d Monster Maze on the ZX81... predates DOOM (an Wolfenstein - why isn't that on there too?) by several years.

    I used to play that one for hours... I jumped out of my skin when the monster got me!

  149. Egads! by serial+frame · · Score: 1

    I dunno about the rest of the world, but speaking for the /. crowd (as well as the sick people that protest with 'AYBABTU' on Deer Hunter on Battle.net), but doesn't good ol' Zero Wing for Genesis deserve a bit of...Fame!?

    --

    -
    And the Angel said unto me, "These are the cries of the carrots! The cries of the carrots!"
  150. Because it's American, not european.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the pre-90s games in the list are either PC games or Nintendo games, cause they didn't play on anything else in the states. They never had BBC's, C64s, spectrums, amigas, atari STs or anything else we would classify as a non-PC "home computer" (well, at least, not in such large proportions). It's highly unlikely these guys never even PLAYED elite. Or any of the following, for that matter : Elite (the mighty) The last ninja trilogy The Turrican trilogy Microprose Soccer (first ever top-down football game?) International Karate (and IK+!) Marble madness Carrier Command Lotus esprit turbo challenge Speedball 2 Shadow of the beast Trailblazer Head over heels Jet set willy Super Stardust Mercenary (did anybody ever manage to complete this?!) Another World Sentinel ...need I go on? Meanwhile, there's a few ommitions that they MUST have played.. Descent? Carmageddon? (surely the most hilarious fun 8 people can have on a LAN? :-)).

    1. Re:Because it's American, not european.. by hemanman · · Score: 1

      You are SO right!!!

      That list is utterly crap, so many great games have been totally forgotten.

      What about Moonstone? Masters of Orion II? Master of magic? Defender of the crown? Giana Sisters? I could go on with this for hours...

      -H

  151. Where can I find Ultima Underworld?! by gelshocker · · Score: 1

    Please someone tell me! (cringing with nostaglia!!)

  152. mail order monsters by coaxial · · Score: 2

    My favorite game of all time is Electronic Arts's Mail Order Monsters. You bought selected a body for your monster (arachnid, brontosaurus, hominid, amoeba, lyonbear, etc), improved its attributes (strength, life, armor, speed, muscle, and brain), added traits to it (photosynthesis, hands, tenticals, poison spit, etc), outfitted it with weapons and armor, and then sent it into battle.

    I spent many a day coming home from grade school, and wasting many an afternoon and evening playing as my mom put it "that mind numbing game".

  153. See ya starside! by rockear · · Score: 1

    Remember that period in your mid-teens, when the music of the period imprinted on you? Of course you do; you still listen to it today, don't even try to lie :) Video games are the same way -- it hits some individual engram buried 'way back in your head. It's fairly obvious how old the sample group and writers for this article were ^_^ I was waiting for the page to load at the end and thinking to myself, "If it's Doom I'm going to scream ..."

    And, OK, yeah, I was kind of disappointed some personal favorites didn't get the shout-out I thought they deserved, but who wasn't? That Starflight wasn't even mentioned was a mark of shame -- when you realize what you've been using for fuel all that time --

    You PC folk may not empathize, but for the Mac, Marathon 2 deserved a nod more than 1 in my opinion; the story was more intricate (Marathon was *always* about the terminals), gameplay was light-years better, and the atmosphere as thick as a sack of lard. Maybe it's because I was playing it during a really rough patch of my life, but We're Everywhere (yes, that specific map) sticks with me, for no obvious reason. My RL-friends and I /still/ get together and LANplay House of Pain, Lack of Vision and No Disintegrations, five years after the game was released. Halo is cute and all, but Durandal is eternal. (Literally.)

    You know they've done something right when you can crack people up just by quoting BOB.

  154. older (Apple ][ era) games by sunhou · · Score: 1

    I was glad to see some of the individuals' top-10 lists (such as Tom Hall's) had some older Apple ][ games. And Wizardry was one of the top 50. I spent a lot of time on that one. And I don't know how much time I spent on Ultima II. (Or was it III? The one where you start out using horses and buggies, and by the end of the game technology has advanced to the point where you actually have to use a space shuttle to go out in space and do something to win the game, although I forget exactly what.)

    But most of the games on their list are ones with an "epic" feel to them. What about the classics which were simple, but people spent just as much time playing? E.g. things like Miner 2049'er (the first title ported to nearly every computer and console out there at the time; I had the Apple ][+ version), Jumpman on Atari computers, and so on? Those were basically the console/computer equivalents of arcade titles such as Joust, Robotron, etc. Simple ideas, but tons of fun and you could spend endless hours on them.

    1. Re:older (Apple ][ era) games by Angry+Toad · · Score: 1

      The one where you start out using horses and buggies, and by the end of the game technology has advanced to the point where you actually have to use a space shuttle to go out in space and

      Nope, this was the original Ultima, number One. I remember it well. The whole spaceship theme never really fit in well with the game as a whole, and was properly dropped in later games.

      Personally, I think the original Ultima deserved at least a mention on the top 50 list. Ultimas III, IV, and V are properly recognized for the completeness and depth of the worlds they presented, and they always pushed things to the edge for the technology of the time. All the same, the original Ultima was a true revelation. We'd never seen anything like it.

      Previous to that, there were a few RPG-like graphics games which took place all on one permanent screen. You just moved a little icon around on the map and had "adventures" in various spots. The sheer scale of the first Ultima was astounding. Not merely four huge continents, but cities to do business in and whole dungeouns to explore, not to mention spaceships to fly. It was the harbinger of things to come, and had incredibly deep gameplay for the time.

      Of course it all came to a sad and sloppy end with Ultimas 8 and 9, but that doesn't diminish to importance of the series to the RPG genre.

  155. Japanese games?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, a total lack of Japanese games on this list....and not just Japanese games but Japanese games that make it here (about 80% of our games). The Japanese create many more, better games then we do here in the states and prople like Sheigeuru Miyamoto are greater game developers then anyone. and yes, Mario64 should be high on te list because it was the first time a "real" 3D walkaround game came out with great control and feel.

    1. Re:Japanese games?! by TotallyUseless · · Score: 1

      metal gear solid... mario64.... final fantasy.. all japanese. all on the list

      --

      Time for some tasty Shiner Bock!
    2. Re:Japanese games?! by shadrax · · Score: 1
      Japanese games make up a tiny portion of PC games, and a large portion of console games.

      The list is biased towards PC games and genres (which I personally prefer immeasurably to console games). That's what you're seeing.

  156. Terrible Top 10 by shadrax · · Score: 1
    Of course any such list is going to be incoherent, being the result of either many people's tastes clashing or one person's idiosyncracies. Also, they have to juggle issues of sequels, graphics, influence vs. gameplay, etc.

    But this list had a few especially ludicrous entries, especially in the top 10...

    10.) Legend of Zelda - NES

    Nah. Wouldn't be on my top 500. If they put Link to the Past here, or Mario 3 (did I miss it in the top 50?), I wouldn't disagree.

    9.) Starcraft
    8.) Ultima Underworld: The Stygian Abyss
    7.) Ultima IV: Quest of the Avatar

    Agreed on all three. (Though I am puzzled why Ultima VII was shafted in the top 50. It's better than either Ultima V or Ultima III, I think.)

    6.) Diablo (the original)

    It was addictive, for sure, but was it really that great a game? I don't think so. I'd put it around 30. Maybe.

    5.) Quake

    Why? What makes it a better game than, say, Jedi Knight?

    4.) Sid Meier's Civilization (the original)

    Of course Civ2 was the better game, but it was Civ that was actually innovative. I loved this game, and I think it deserves its place.

    3.) Warcraft 2

    Huh? How? Why? It was good, no doubt. It was top 50 of all time, maybe. But it wasn't as good as Starcraft or a number of other RTS games. Moreover, it wasn't particularly innovative or groundbreaking.

    2.) Half-life

    No way. The single player game is outclassed by System Shock, Thief, et al. The mods should be judged separately (as Counterstrike was).

    1.) Doom

    Whatever.

    It seems to me that console games were represented rather poorly overall, though my bias is also towards PC games. The fact that I played every one of the console games listed is telling--I haven't played all that many.

    Older games are definitely shafted, but the authors probably come from about the same generation I do, so I'm not really able to correct them.

    Not to mention giving Blizzard 30% of the top 10...and id's forgettable splatfests 20%.

    1. Re:Terrible Top 10 by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      >> 6.) Diablo (the original)
      >
      > It was addictive, for sure, but was it really
      > that great a game? I don't think so. I'd put it
      > around 30. Maybe.

      I think I stopped playing it around level 14 or so (or was it level 8?) "Gee, the dogs are a tenth different color, and the spit they bark at you is a tenth different color and is more damaging." Thank god the graphics are so bleeding edge...oh wait, they're not.

      >> 1.) Doom
      >
      > Whatever.

      I completely agree with you. If you freeze-frame it, you can pinpoint the exact moment where most of these guys got their first erection. Too young to see the looming Richter 9-scale earthquake shift on the horizon from "static 3D", aka Dungeon Master, the later D&D games, etc. to "moving 3D", aka Wolf 3D and it's lesser-known precursor cousin, they all jammed on Doom, which just happened to be the technologically leading-edge FPS at the time they all went into college and discovered a networked FPS game.

      As far as FPS's go:

      1. Half-Life
      2. Duke Nukem
      3. Thief
      4. Quake
      5. Unreal

      Doom? Whazzat? Oh, that's that game with the marginally better graphics than Wolf 3D that filled the gap until Duke Nukem. It's one technological innovation, being able to climb on things (i.e. not just one flat level to run around on) was much smaller than the revolution of Wolf 3D and the much greater evolution to full rotational 3D of Quake (or Descent, for that matter, which I didn't like much as a game.)

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    2. Re:Terrible Top 10 by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      Oops! The problem with lists is you always think of something after you make it. I left Wolf 3D itself out, should be at #3.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  157. All these FPS, and no Rise of the Triad? by pergamon · · Score: 1

    How can that be?

    Also, no BBS door games? WTF?

  158. perhaps rename the list to... by jaiteend · · Score: 1

    the top 50 reasons why teens nowadays just don't get it? or perhaps the top 50 reasons why you guys are considered old farts and don't belong?

    i don't know. i read through that (and yes, FPS bias) and thought to myself, "self, why are those games considered the greatest of all time?" "well, self, i can see why x-com, and zeldas and FFs are on the list, but doom the GREATEST of all time?" "true, self, i didn't see any of the old ssi games on there (you know, the company that was able to get ad&d on the computer and do it well)."

    "oh, self, and where the fuck is leisure suit larry and its brethren?" heavens to mergotroid, no games by sierra on-line at all? sigh.

    to recap, what does it take to be one of the greatest games of all time? fast paced, no plot, good eye candy.

    --
    and the Irishman took the fly in his hands and yelled, "spit it out!"
  159. Guess I'm not really a gamer anymore... by hearingaid · · Score: 1

    hey, at least I recognized most of the list.

    for reference, here's the whole thing:

    1. DOOM
    2. Ultima
    3. Civilization
    4. Half-Life
    5. The Legend of Zelda
    6. Warcraft
    7. Quake
    8. Super Mario Brothers
    9. Diablo
    10. Age of Empires / System Shock (TIE) (causes bug in numbering)
    11. Super Mario 64
    12. System Shock 2
    13. Duke Nukem 3D
    14. Age of Empires
    15. EverQuest
    16. Age of Empires 2: The Age of Kings
    17. The Bard's Tale
    18. Deus Ex
    19. Tetris
    20. Castlevania: Symphony of the Night
    21. Wizardry: Proving Grounds of the Mad Overlord
    22. Sid Meier's Civilization 2
    23. Final Fantasy 3
    24. System Shock
    25. M.U.L.E.
    26. Star Control 2
    27. Asheron's Call
    28. Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past
    29. Counter-Strike
    30. Street Fighter 2
    31. Command & Conquer
    32. Metal Gear Solid
    33. Sim City
    34. Wing Commander
    35. X-COM: UFO Defense
    36. Baldur's Gate
    37. Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn
    38. Goldeneye 007
    39. Zork: The Great Underground Empire
    40. Thief: The Dark Project
    41. Ultima III: Exodus
    42. Ultima V: Warriors of Destiny
    43. Legend of Zelda: The Ocarina of Time
    44. Marathon
    45. Planescape: Torment
    46. Super Metroid
    47. Quake II
    48. Ultima Online
    49. Empire, Wargame of the Century (and Empire Deluxe)
    50. Total Annihilation

    there are actually 51 games, due to their inability to pick a number 10 and then numbering the next one number 11. sigh.

    anyway, I've never even heard of: #10 (the second one), #12, #20, #24 (huh - in there twice?), #31, #32, #35, #38 (well apart from the movie :), #46, and #50. so obviously I can't comment on those.

    and I quite definitely agree that quite a few of these titles need to be on the list. ones I specifically object to:

    • Super Mario Brothers - what is with people? It's Donkey Kong, and it has always sucked.
    • Zork: The Great Underground Empire - the review describes Adventure as being strange and impossible to solve. Gee, guess the acorn doesn't fall far from the tree.

    games which I think are missing:

    • Elite. Hello? Star Control 2 fans? There was a game before it, and it's wickedly amazing. I keep a 64 around just to play it on. You haven't lived until you've played Elite with a WICO Boss joystick that allows you to rotate the stick's base so that you can use the side-laser screens to shoot accurately.
    • Dungeon Keeper/Dungeon Master/Dungeon Keeper 2. The whole series is brutally addictive.
    • SMAC. Civ gets #3, Civ2 gets #22. Well fine. Civ2 was a slight revision of Civ: sure the computer opponents are a bit brighter, and there are some cute new technologies (submarines are fun). oh yeah, and the tech path has been changed a bit, so that people can no longer win the game any level up to about Prince or so just by knowing to develop The Wheel first, build a pile of chariots, and beat the crap out of everyone. and Pottery is now a prereq for some things, thus stopping me from only ever learning it in the 20th century (Pyramids are great :)... But SMAC is a whole new game, and it's absolutely wonderful. It deserves at least Civ2's spot.

    Oh yeah. And there are no "realistic" karate games. SF2 is the only game listed, with denigrating reference to its descendants, all of which were full of people throwing fireballs and the like. Games like Karateka are totally forgotten.

    I stopped playing karate games because of SF2 and its children. The goofy "special moves" are just plain, well, goofy. :)

    Anyway, I think I'll go finish last night's SMAC game off now. Enjoy. :)

    --

    my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

  160. This is a total sham! by howardjp · · Score: 1

    Where is PacMan? Where is Pong? Where is Breakout? Where is Hunt the Wumpus? These guys have no idea. I still play these games because they are far better than most of the games released today.

  161. Re:Pong?!?! by karkle · · Score: 1
    It sounds like this is the point of you from someone fairly young who started playing games after they have been developed for awhile.

    If you never had video games before and then Pong came along it was the best and most fun game. It was simply awesome at that time since it was the only game in town.

    But yeah if Quake is the first game you played and then someone tries to show you pong, it probably won't look all that much fun now.

  162. Uh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This may just be a troll, but I ask this:

    Why should we care?

    Making a list is so useless and subjective that almost everyone would disagree with it. Now we're going to end up with posts like "Why isn't game X on the list?"

    And why is DOOM #1? There are plenty of games out now that outrank DOOM. If we want to go retro, why is Starcraft in there? Plenty of games that came out in that genre before that. Why isn't Pong on?

  163. Something weird... by mickeyreznor · · Score: 1

    this isn't really complaining, but I just find it very odd that Wolfenstein 3-D was somehow left out of the list, especially since they gave it praise while they were commenting on Doom, and given the obvious FPS tilt. Once again, i'm not trying to complain or anything, just an observation.

  164. Re:Tony Hawk by iainl · · Score: 1

    Ok, I'll disagree. I have all three of those platforms and didn't buy Tony Hawks. I did get it for the GBA however, and much prefer the 720-style view. I've played the Playstation version a little and didn't like it at all. All in all, as with every list it says more about the compilers than the games though. Warcraft II above Quake? Mario 64 not in the top three? I'm sure everyone can find something to disagree with.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  165. WTF, where the hell is Bolo? by bigox · · Score: 1

    Shit, this game is still incredibly playable today and was one of the first games that I could play on a LAN since AppleTalk boxes were so much cheaper than Ethernet equipment back then. But shit, wasn't this one of the earliest head to head muli-player network games? I was really tickled to see Pirates! I could never figure out the optimal way to swordfight aside from going to the open line and using combos.

  166. They forgot Tradewars. And how Tetris that low? by Erioll · · Score: 1

    These guys COMPLETELY forgot the online genre before UO. BBS games were the first truly persistent online games. Later, some you could connect to over the internet (telnet into the BBS) so they were even worldwide in some cases. Other fans of this genre of games, suggest your favorites.

    As well, how could tetris be that low on the list? It practically CREATED the graphical puzzle genre of games. In the review, they gave it quite high praise talking about it, but it got a crappy rating. They were right talking about "What other game are you still playing 10 years after it was made?", but they fail to see its significance.

    All in all, quite a bad show from their staff and reviewers.

    Erioll

    P.S. Doom is #1? That is the funniest thing i ever saw.

  167. Star Control II by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm glad one list finally recognizes one of the greatest games of all time - Star Control II If you haven't played it, you really need to. Awesome story, fantastic music, decent graphics, a killer ending, and the best villains ever in a computer game. You can probably find it free on the web as abandonware!!!

  168. TW2002 by D_Gr8_BoB · · Score: 2

    Granted, LORD was an amazing game, but once you delve into the realm of BBS games, you simply can't do better than the MBBS version of Tradewars 2002. God, I wasted a lot of my life playing that...

  169. A crime! by Have+Blue · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    Marathon is #44! It deserves number 1! Or at least number 7...

    1. Re:A crime! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I was really surprised to see Marathon on the list, but it certainly deserves to be there. After seeing Marathon, I was kind of hoping to see "Spaceward Ho!" as well, but no such luck.

      Oh well. At least some classic Macintosh games are making the lists.

    2. Re:A crime! by nrrogers · · Score: 1

      Frog blast the vent core! Marathon should have been top 20 at least.

  170. Oregon Trail? by Faizdog · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but there's just one game missing from that list. Oregon Trail, though simple, was one of the most addictive early games I'd played. I mean, come on managing everything, and don't tell me you didn't like hunting. I'd always buy max bullets and little food, do all hunting. Sucked that you could always only carry back 200lbs regardless of how much you shot.

    --
    -"Those who fought today will die tommorow."-
  171. Seeing as though we all disagree... by orbitalia · · Score: 1

    Anyone willing to setup a free vote of /.'ers favourite games of *all* time.. It would be interesting to see what came out top (nethack i'd guess :PP) If I had my own server with enough bandwidth i'd do it myself :) (That link to the list in the original article appears to be broken for me.. )

  172. oh come on! by rambot · · Score: 1

    Tribes didn't even make the list? You've got to be kidding me. It was far and away the first game that brought large team multiplayer TEAMWORK gameplay to the FPS. You don't work as a team, you loose. I mean the first in the sense that working together goes beyond just the weapons side of the game. This game in my mind deserves to be at least in the top 20.


  173. Pong?!?! by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Dude, you guys yelling "Where's Pong?" need to get a clue! Pong is *not* one of the best games of all time! It gets kind of boring after a while. Pong was the first; it was influential, groundbreaking, innovative, visionary, and even fun in small doses. However, that doesn't make it the best game of all time. The best games are the ones that are the most fun!

    I think compiling a list of games that are more fun than Pong wouldn't be too hard. Now, if the list was of the most important games of all time, I'm sure Pong would top the list.

    --
    main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    1. Re:Pong?!?! by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1
      If you never had video games before and then Pong came along it was the best and most fun game.

      Right. I'm not disputing that. But if, at that time, you had had other, more advanced games to play, you probably would have played those instead and had even more fun. Pong doesn't stack up in sheer fun to games that came after it. That doesn't mean that Pong was never fun. I have played Pong and had fun. However, I have also played MarioKart 64 against 4 other people and had *much more* fun than Pong could ever hope to be. If you had a choice between Pong and 4-player MarioKart, which would you choose?

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    2. Re:Pong?!?! by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      Yes, Pong was boring. Now Warlords was Pong on steroids, and could have made the list.

      Up to four players, one in each corner, trying to destroy the other 3's castles. Pong with much more to do, multiplayer (up to 4 players - massivly multiplayer for that time, Atari 2600.)

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  174. Blizzard in the top 10. by frknfrk · · Score: 2
    Blizzard has 3 'worlds', and 3 games in the top 10 all time: Starcraft, Diablo, and Warcraft II. For all you 'blah blah, such and such is behind warcraft II?' people, I'll first say that I loved Warcraft II. It is probably my 5th favorite game ever. But none of my favorites made the top 10 anyway. My list:
    1. Wizardry I-III (Proving Grounds of the Mad Overlord, LL, etc, which I still play on occasion under Apple ][ emulator)
    2. Zork/Enchanter (I lump them as one, and yes, I still have my box sets)
    3. Eye of the Beholder I-II (which I still play on occasion)
    4. Sim City 2000 (which I wish I hadn't broke, I was SO addicted to this game)
    5. Ultima III (which I don't play anymore, although you can under Apple ][ emulator)
    6. Warcraft II
    One of the reasons I REALLY love Blizzard games (and no, I don't work for them) is that their hardware requirements vs. how great they look and play is absolutely right up there with the best in the 'biz'. Check out the hardware requirements for Starcraft or Diablo, probably a P-90. And I -loved- those games. Call me biased (bait) but I hate overloaded FPS games like Quake, UT, Daikatana, etc, etc. They take a P-300 and mega graphics cards to play. I'll stick with Blizzard and my trusty P-120, but I just might upgrade for Warcraft III :) And yes, I grew up on an Apple ][ playing Infocom and Sir-TECH games. I am a geek, of course.
    --
    The REAL sam_at_caveman_dot_org is user ID 13833.
    1. Re:Blizzard in the top 10. by frknfrk · · Score: 2

      Obviously I can't count. But I also forgot Wing Commander (the original), another great game which blows half of this FPS crap to little bits.

      --
      The REAL sam_at_caveman_dot_org is user ID 13833.
  175. LORD? by Phizzy · · Score: 2

    Where is Legend of the Red Dragon? Can we not include our BBS Door-game brethren in this fine list?

    and how is Counterstrike not in the top ten.. tisk tisk.

    //Phizzy

    --
    "Most European technology just isn't worth our stealing," -- Former CIA chief James Woolsey, referring to Echelon
  176. Re: CounterStrike by xenocide2 · · Score: 1
    I have a feeling its not on the top ten for the same reason Ender's Game the AP isn't a "novel of literary merit." Specifically, the AP says Ender's Game is too new, but maybe years from now it will have merit. Which makes little sense. The novel hasn't changed.

    Similarly, the list was compiled by polling Gamespy staff and several "prominent" PC developers' top 10 games of all time. Which means you get a list mostly by people who had a NES rather than a 300 baud modem. And the general elitist view on CS is that its a "mod" not a game. Yea. Its bullshit too. But Half-Life is number 2, so hey!

    --
    I Browse at +4 Flamebait

    Open Source Sysadmin

  177. Huh?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happened to Bubble Bobble? How could they not include that game??

    I've never even heard of half those games, but that's probably because I don't play games on a PC.

    What a stupid list...

    Outrun, Defender, Galaga, Metal Slug 3, etc... Where are they?

  178. What about these games! by ajax142 · · Score: 1

    This list does seem to be lacking the good old 80's and early 90's games that really deserve recognition. So I'm summit a list of the top 3 games that should be on the list for there high quality at the time.

    3. Kingdom of Kroz (1987, Apogee) - This games was really the first overhead 3rd person game I ever saw.

    2. Commander Keen (1990, Apogee) - No list should be without this great side scroller, rememeber not all of us has GebeForce 8 video cards. This game really lead to Duke Nukem (the origanal, not 3D), then Wolfenstein 3-D and eventually to Doom.

    And

    1. ZZT (1991, Epic MegaGames)- This game really was great for it's time, It had unlimited playablity with it's built in programming language (ZZT-OOP). Game development continues on it even today! Also it can run on just about any PC you have laying around. First really great game from the makers of Unreal.

    1. Re:What about these games! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2D Nukem, ahh this brings back memories.

  179. Elite. by tubs · · Score: 1
    One game that just should have been there ...

    Elite.

    'Nuff Said.

    --

    try to make ends meet, you're a slave to money, then you die

  180. Tony Hawk by gosquad · · Score: 1

    Also, since they seem to be stuck in the 90s, (ie- omitting Maniac Mansion and Wasteland) why is Tony Hawk Pro Skater not on this list? Anyone who owns a playstation or dreamcast (or even PC) has bought this game and still plays it! (I know I do). Anyone agree?

    1. Re:Tony Hawk by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      Besides, rocket jumping to places "you're not supposed to be" is so much more satisfying than successfully doing a 540.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  181. Not definitive or authoritative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't care if they missed Super Mario Bros. or Elite, not putting Nethack in the top 10 is unacceptable; but it's not even on the list. Pthooey!

  182. Myst??? by cmckay · · Score: 1

    Okay... I love FPS games as much as the next guy, but to omit Myst???

    C'mon! Was there anyone who didn't have their proverbial socks blown off when they first saw that game back in 1994?

    The exquisite soundtrack, the skillful 3D art... Pure pre-rendered beauty!

  183. Re:M.U.L.E. (slightly OT) by Zalgon+26+McGee · · Score: 1
    Get an Atari 800 instead. Not only does it support 4 joysticks, but it also built to be nuclear strike resistant.

    (Anyone who's opened up an 800 can testify to this!!!)

    --

    ---

    Book(n): Utensil used to pass time while waiting for the TV repairman

  184. HE IS RIGHT by thopo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    God Lord, i didn't even noticed it. But you are right. And it is a shame the game is not on the list. I've played this game forever on my C64! I didn't know you could save the game so i had to start i new game every time and unfortunately the day is quite short and me and a friend of mine probably replayed it 50 times until we finished it :)
    Oh my, that brings some memories back.

    --
    keep it simple.
  185. Starcraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How the hell did Starcraft get ranked 9th? It has archaic technology, piss poor game play, a bad "plot". The game is all about clicking as fast as you possibly can. If you want a real game, play Myth (The Fallen Lords, Myth 2: Soulblighter, Myth 3: The Wolf Age)

  186. How Quickly We Forget..... by Surak_Prime · · Score: 1

    I can't believe I just witnessed a list of "top games of all time" that didn't include a variant of Pac-Man, Galaga, or any other arcade game on it! Computer games have come a long way, but in the very beginning, when personal computers still cost insane amounts of money for most people, those 25 cent coin-ops were CREATING this entire industry. The fact that these "top developers" didn't remember these just shows how quickly your 15 minutes of fame passes in the gaming world, and how easy it has become for people to forget life before Windows 95 and Nintendo.

    I will be surprised to still see Zork on future lists, as well - not because it doesn't deserve to be there, but because game developers will have lost that much more of their history, or never even been introduced to it.

    --
    :::The Spear in the heart of the Other is the Spear in the heart of You; You are He - Surak of Vulcan:::
    1. Re:How Quickly We Forget..... by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      We aren't quite at the point where people who remember Zork or Pong or Odyssee are dying off in droves, but you can certainly see the weighting towards latter-day games. Just the love of the relatively lame Super Mario Brothers (really blows your socks off compared to dozens of previous hop-around games?) seen around here shows this.

      What's really scary is that there are kids whose first non-child's game computer experience is something like EverQuest or Quake III or Half-Life. Really old games like those on Atari (much less text-based RPG's) will seem incalculably boring and stupid to them.

      No, you can't go back. But if anyone starts talking about how cool the Power Rangers were, I'm gonna have (the old) Speed Racer punch you right in the shnozz.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  187. Ohmygod, starcontrol 2? by iowaguy2 · · Score: 1

    This game got about 2 minutes of my attention, and i am still angry I paid for it. Did people actually play this one? I can't believe it made top 50 and Myst did not. Someone has to be on crack.

  188. My Humble Opinion by humblecoder · · Score: 1
    The problem with these sorts of list is that everyone has a different criteria as far as what makes a game great. I wouldn't lose much sleep if your favorite game isn't on the list.

    That being said, I'm surprised that a lot of very influential games weren't able to crack the Top 50:

    [Pac Man, Asteroids, Space Invaders, Pitfall, Pole Position, NetHack, Donkey Kong (which spawned literally hundreds of spin-off games), Space Quest, Missile Command, Lode Runner, Super Mario Bros.]

    As you can see from my list, I think there should have been more early console and coin-op games on the list. The list totally ignores a huge segment of the gaming world.

  189. I Deliberately forgot L.O.R.D by Erioll · · Score: 1

    Of course I forgot L.O.R.D. Because it S.U.C.K.E.D. You finish the game, and it starts you at the beginning. Plus, it really wasn't that interactive with others. Sure, you could fight if you wanted to, but for the most part it was independant. And not that fun either. What I was meaning are the persistent games, like Tradewars, and Galactic Empire. I didn't list them because I wanted people to say what THEY liked, not list all the ones that I used to play.

    Eriol

    P.S. Sorry everyone else for this flame. This post just seemed to be screaming for one back from sheer ignorance.

  190. Super mario 64 should have been N1! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's my opinion and I'll say more I'm a big Zelda and mario fan and a nintendo orthodox but SM64 is better then SMB3 not only better it's a revolution wheras SMB3 is the better version of SMB, go play it again and then mmake ur comments

  191. Games that made the biggest impact on me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Wizardry
    2. Digger
    3. Kings Quest
    4. Dune
    5. Ultima Underworld
    6. Doom
    7. Ancient art of war
    8. Civilisation
    9. War of the lance
    10. Eye of the beholder

  192. past /. story by waterbiscuit · · Score: 1
    A story like this was posted back in december with the top 15 pc games. they rated it as (15 down to one)
    Wing Commander
    Ultima III: Exodus
    Alone in the Dark
    Ultima Online
    Tomb Raider
    Falcon 3.0
    SimCity
    Half-Life
    Civilization
    Diablo
    Dune II: Battle for Arrakis
    King's Quest IV: Perils of Rosella
    Myst
    Doom
    Quake

    Interesting to make the comparison as to which of these pc games rate well when compared with other consoles etc.

  193. Cool!! Ultima Underworld in the top 10!! by TimeHorse · · Score: 1

    Okay, I don't like First person -- or 3rd person shooters, PERIOD! But I know they will always top such lists of games for I don't know what reason but I accept it. OTOH, any list that puts Ultima Underworld: The Stygian Abyss -- my personal #1 at #8, Legend of Zelda at #10, Diablo at #6 and Civilization at #4 is definitely worth looking at even for folks like me. I would have put Wolfenstein higher and will never underestimate the power of Solitare for its simple convenience ("Quick Fix") value, but all in all, agreeing with 4 of the top 10 is pretty darn good in a list of 50.

    Devo Andare,

    Jeffrey.

    --
    Time Lord, Dark Horse: The Techno Mage of Gallifrey
  194. Top 100 Games Of All Time by znark · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here you can find almost the same thing looked from another angle: Amiga Report Top 100 Games Of All Time .

  195. Punch Out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since no one's mentioned it.. that was my favorite nes game.

  196. M.U.L.E. by ThesQuid · · Score: 1

    I'm just astonished that they remembered M.U.L.E. (25)
    I think about half my free time in college was taken up yelling at the tv or my friends when they wouldn't sell me enough energy to run my production. We used to collect players for a game just by sticking our heads in the door of someone's room and yelling, "MULE!". Hell, it was even a spectator sport. Lately I scrounged up an old C64 that we still use exclusively for playing MULE.

    Goddamn Mechtrons.

  197. Sigh--Far too PC and FPS Biased by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 2
    I love FPS (Quake III for Linux--mmmm mmmm), and I understand that x86s and consoles are what most people think of nowadays when they think games, but still. Some of the best games I've played were Mac games; some Unix games. Here's my own list:
    • Marathon, Marathon II & Marathon Infinity

      Back when Doom was the big thing, Marathon came out. You actually had to aim up and down. Enemies would float down on you from above and behind. There were real puzzles. And the story! Never have a played a game with as engrossing a story. Marathon II took things up a notch, but wasn't as revolutionary. Marathon Infinity was a whole new story--a troubling and confusing one, at that. And Marathon still lives. There are tons of interesting mods (Tempus Irae, a Rennaissance Italy mod, is one of my favourites), and even an open source (yes, that means Linux!) version. Marathon II had a Windows version; all other commercial version were Mac-only; the open source is Mac, Linux, Windows and BeOS.

    • Escape Velocity

      Want an exploration game? Want to be a space trader (remember trading games?)? Want an arcade space combat game? Want to conquer the galaxy? Escape Velocity allowed one to do all that and more. An incredible engine, not in terms of graphics, but in terms of capabilities. Truly outside-the-box thinking, it was one of the real greats. It is Mac-only.

    • Angband

      First there was rogue. Then there was Moria. And then there was Angband. Expandable, extensible, just plain fun. It was winnable, too, which I cannot say for NetHack (which is in many ways a superior game, except that I spend all of my time on the first 6 levels) or Omega (I've just not played it enough).

    • Descent

      Another one that came out right around Doom. Doom (and Marathon) had a boring map type--walls went straight from floor to ceiling; all floors and ceilings were parallel. The player ran around killing things. Descent changed all that by offering a FPS with true spherical movement: the player flew through tunnels, able to turn in any direction, control pitch, yaw and elevation. The gameplay was incredible. I'm not certain why this genre has not caught on. In many ways, it's similar to a flight simulator, but with an arcade flavour. A ripping good time; I'm playing Descent III on Linux these days. Descent was originally offered for Mac and Windows boxes.

    • Contra

      I'm not certain why, but Contra was one of those games I could just play for hours and hours without end. I loved it deeply, and was awful at it. But man was it fun!

    Incidentally, when's slashdot going to support <dl>?

  198. Gamespy... by xfs · · Score: 1

    I know this is a little off subject, but gamespy as of late has gown down the tube.
    They now force you to create a gamespy login ID to download off of fileplanet.com. Also, once you get your ID registered and go to start downloading, it can put you in a queue for quite some time before you actually get to download it.

  199. Chrono Trigger by dragonmaster_zoc · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I just can't see how this game was passed over and yet so many of the Ultima games made it. I mean, I played those, but they were nowhere near as pleasing as Chrono Trigger. The exception is Ultima Online, which I consider a very good game, and it only gets 48!

  200. Infocom? by Notorious+Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but any one of infocoms 100+ games should have dominated that list.

    Suspended took me three years to figure out. Beyond Zork: The best game ever.
    Trinity? Awesome game.
    Nord and Bert? Good lord, how'd they miss that?

    Oh wait, maybe flashy graphics make a game good..

    Explains why there aren't and space/kings/heroes/police quest games there either. And each and every one of those were much better than any First-person shooter.

    God, Twitch, shoot, twitch? Do the video game companies really want us to build up large muscles in our hands?

    prolixity

  201. Fallout 1 or 2, Descent? by radartroop · · Score: 1

    Sure, all "Greatest Hits" lists are subjective, and won't come close to satisfying everyone, but I'm gonna yell anyway: how in the hell did FO1 or 2 miss that list? Starcraft and BG1 make it, but neither FO? That's screwball!

    Omitting Descent 1 or 2 I can see, although barely, despite the fact that one or the other would easily make my top 20. What about Jagged Alliance 2? An absolutely awesome game with endless replay potential.

    They got it right in some respects: Doom should be #1. It's succesor was the sole reason I decided to buy my first computer: I shelled out $600.00 for 16 Megs of RAM: remember those days?. However, games like X-Com TFTD and Descent 1 quickly validated my purchase. That was back in the day when I'd play from dusk to dawn.

    The inclusion of X-Com UFOD was spot-on as well. Both System Shocks definitely deserved to make the cut, as well as Duke 3D.

    Wish they'd omitted consoles. At least Super Metroids made the cut, but I would have had to choose Herzog Zwei as well.

    In fairness to the reviewers, there are entire genres I've virtually ignored (simulations, god-games, fighting). The editors had to make room for games from every genre in both PC and Console. They made some tough calls, I know, but I have to say that the omission of one of the Fallout games has to be the biggest boner of all. I went through them from 50 to 1, in that order, and as I went I was increasingly please because I fealt certain that FO was going to score higher than I'd anticipated. It wasn't until I got to the 10-2 page that I realized it had been overlooked: I knew Doom had to be #1.

    Think it's time for me to contact Gamespy and ask for an explanation.

  202. Stargate/Defender? by radartroop · · Score: 1

    You're taking me back to the day....

    Either Defender or Stargate deserved to be on that list. Stargate had me hooked so bad that, given the choice between $3.00 worth of Stargate or a porno mag, I wouldn't have thought twice. What a game.

    Now, I'm not so sure about Pong or Breakout: I think I played those games (on the Atari) when it was either that or Gilligan's Island. But It wasn't as though I'd miss Starsky and Hutch just to play Pong.

  203. Mac Dark Castle series by yournamehere · · Score: 1
    Dark Castle and Beyond Dark Castle were some of the best games for the Mac. Dark Castle had beautiful 2D side scrolling levels, clever well thought-out levels, and would rune fine on a mac classic. Beyond Dark Castle was an even bigger better game than the original and was the one I played and wasted much too much time back in the 80's.

    These mooks have ported dark castle to newer, less-suckful macs and made it colour at the same time. It also looks like they've been doing the same with other badass-but-unmentioned-in-the-list games like spaceward ho.

  204. Two Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oregon Trail! Hunting, entertaining diseases, suicidal fords, and you were encouraged to do all this in an educational facility. What more could you want?

    1. Re:Two Words by xXgeneric+nicknameXx · · Score: 0

      oregon trail!! i thought i was the only one that remembered that game. ill never forget playing it on the one computer my elementary school had, an apple 2e. i can still remember the thrill of hunting deer with the space bar/shotgun...

      --

      My cat's breath smells like cat food.--R. Wiggums

  205. Where's Magic Carpet? by idealego · · Score: 1

    They should take half life off the list and replace it with magic carpet in the same spot.

  206. They also forgot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Tetris....

  207. Saturn Bomberman by Kris_J · · Score: 2

    I have to mention Saturn Bomberman, and this seems to be the right thread to do it in. What other non-mainstream sports game gives you ten human-controlled players on one screen at one time? In that mode there's very little having to get used to controls -- up, down, left, right, BOMB. The ultimate party game.

  208. It's play, not flash by localroger · · Score: 2
    A great game is not about having to memorize a bizarre collection of tools and terrain features and such to play on a landscape the size of Siberia. Some of the best games ever designed can be learned in minutes, but require years to master.

    The early games couldn't rely on the crutch of snazzy graphics to grab your attention so they were meticulously tuned for playability. The distance and speed torpedoes travelled, the EFX reward for explosions and captures, the size and brightness of images and responsiveness of controls, were all play-tested for months before a game was released to market. At a place like Atari, dozens or even hundreds of people might play a game for hours before it went out the door. All that feedback went back into making the game more playable.

    Today, games are built in closed shops which do not have these resources, and much of the resources they have are spent creating necessary artwork. Simple games of dexterity or strategy are simply not to be found. Doom is not a hopped-up Battlezone; it is another thing entirely. Wolfenstein 3D comes somewhere in between. But the closest you will get to Battlezone today is the Microsoft port, which doesn't play like the original. Sure, it looks like the original, but it doesn't play the same, especially when the missiles come out -- I should know, since in its heyday I could walk up to an arcade Battlezone machine and write my name vertically on the high score list.

    Game makers just don't pay attention to that fine-level play any more. Early games made awesome play out of limited graphics and CPU time. DigDug took a liability of early hardware -- difficulty of re-rendering the landscape after an object had passed and erased it -- and turned it into a play feature. (Lode Runner took this to the next level on the 8-bit home computer.)

    I trace the beginning of the death of game play to the Intellivision. Every console since has continued the trend -- immersiveness substitutes ever more for cleanness and simple play. A great game takes minutes to learn and a lifetime to master, but most of today's games are the other way around; by the time you can even get through them without cheat codes, they're lame and stale and you're ready for the next new even more immersive experience that will bore you just as fast.

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
    1. Re:It's play, not flash by hearingaid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      while in general I agree with the post (well kinda), I feel the deep inner need to nitpick. :)

      At a place like Atari, dozens or even hundreds of people might play a game for hours before it went out the door. All that feedback went back into making the game more playable.

      and yes, this explains why on the 2600, Atari's Pac-Man did very well while Sierra On-Line's Jawbreaker (playtested by virtually nobody except a few geeks at Sierra) collapsed.

      I don't know about Lode Runner. (Which was an amazing game, much better than the horror which happened later, known as Super Mario.)

      That said, I don't know when it went bad. I also don't think there's anything wrong with immersiveness.

      The most immersive game I've ever played is Sid Maier's Alpha Centauri. It's intense. You get the what-do-you-mean-it's-sunrise effect.

      The next most immersive game, I think, was Paradroid. I played that for days sometimes. (Well nights anyway :) It didn't have flashy graphics (not by today's standards) - but it did have a very intense soundtrack (even if rather low-fi on '80s equipment). And it had a fairly high level of sophistication: although all the different parts of the game were basically speed & dexterity tests, they worked differently; in particular it took a bit to get the hang of the take-over challenge screen.

      the other games I miss are the construction games. Quake has tried to step up a bit with level editing, but it's just not the same. racing destruction set especially was an amazing game.

      which is another complaint about the green-hat (heh, anybody else notice a similarity to a specific open-source corporate logo there?) list. no racing games. none. geesh. I spent countless hours as a teenager playing great american cross-country road race. not really the greatest game ever, I don't even know who made it. (this was in the heyday of the underground. you just got disks with games on them, had to figure out what they were when you got them.)

      so anyway, tangent over, I hope. when it's all said and done, I like quake, and think it's probably the most radical thing to happen to gaming in the '90s (being as it basically introduced both OpenGL and TCP/IP gaming). what I find frustrating actually is that while gaming graphics have come very, very far in a short time, and we've seen some pretty major strides forward in the mainstream for networked play, there hasn't nearly been as much work done on either (a) simple games that function as a test of skill, or (b) storylines. I'd like to see a game on a DVD-ROM that uses the format to hold a whole world. why not?

      hmm, maybe it's time for me to get back into programming after all... :)

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

    2. Re:It's play, not flash by Kupek · · Score: 2
      Blah blah blah, "kids these days don't know what real games are."

      In twenty years, someone will be saying the same thing about the games they grew up with. And that's the key, that's what you grew up with.

      You're also looking for a much different experience than I am. You want simple puzzle-like games. Personally, I want to search over something the size of Siberia; I love console RPGs, and get a big kick out of exploring these digital worlds the game designers have created.

      Before you preach about how games should be, stop to think that maybe what you want and what other people want from their games is entirely different.

  209. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a single Sega game on the list?? This list is hardly accurate then.

  210. What do you expect? by Judas96' · · Score: 1

    Many people seem to be complaining about the lack of oler titles mentioned. What did you expect? GameSpy has too keep in mind it's target audience/demographic. On top of that you can bet the list was made by members of that audience/demographic. Yeah, not many old games, but us teenage to young adult gamers are going to have a hard time remembering those, for the most part.

  211. Three major omissions: Descent, Myth, Myst by Durindana · · Score: 1

    For a list clearly too heavy on first-person shooters (even old-school ones), Descent and sequels' absence is a joke. Myst/Riven also deserve a place - perhaps developers didn't think much of them, but their audiences certainly did. How many more copies were sold of Myst/Riven than of Doom or even Quake? Plenty. But the most egregious slight is to Myth and its sequel. A revolution in gameplay no FPS since Wolf 3D has managed, groundbreaking atmospherics and beautiful finish (Dwarves have never bitched and moaned so entertainingly) made Myth unquestionably one of the best ever - even for pale-faced freaks with index-finger twitches.

  212. ADOM!!!!! by Nitar · · Score: 1

    Four words - Ancient Domains of Mystery.

    ADOM is a roguelike game, and while it didn't start this genre, it is certainly the best. This deserves to be on the top 10. Easily one of the most addictive rpg's available. The amount of customization for your character is tremendous. Learning everything that there is to do, and learning what everything does burns many many hours. Don't look at the spoilers... ;)

    -Nitar

  213. chronotrigger anyone? by xXgeneric+nicknameXx · · Score: 0

    how could they have missed that one...definitely one of the best (maybe even THE best) PRGs of all time.

    --

    My cat's breath smells like cat food.--R. Wiggums

    1. Re:chronotrigger anyone? by xXgeneric+nicknameXx · · Score: 0

      RPGs even

      --

      My cat's breath smells like cat food.--R. Wiggums

  214. Top 50 "Computer" Games of All Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't see any qualifications in GameSpy's article about only computer games. Maybe Katz should write an essay "Does life exist outside of computers?"

    Top game of all time? Chess.
    Monopoly ought to be in the top 10 too.

  215. Lode Runner on the original Mac by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

    It's too bad this (and Dark Castle) were on the Mac, or they'd have made the list certainly.

    While the PC traded off having color for having pixels the size of JLo's right ass cheek, the Mac, pure B&W, had teeny-tiny square pixels and this excellent Lode Runner game, with digitized sound (another feature years away on the PC in any kind of quantity.)

    Pure puzzle brilliance and you could design your own levels, too. Yeah, it came out a decade later on the PC as a nostalgia game (which I bought), but still.

    I do note a curious lack of puzzle games. Where is the Lemmings series? Tetris is on there, but that's about it. I think the bias showed up in the comments over Half-Life, where they denegrate the last episode because of all the jumping puzzles. As someone who loves puzzle games (not to mention once being in an excellent Quake clan) the "troublesome" jumping was right up my alley.

    --
    I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  216. The concept of "Top 50" isn't clear, either by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

    What do they mean by "Top 50"?

    - Most evolutionary (e.g. Half-Life?)

    - Most revolutionary (e.g. Wolf 3D?)

    - Most time-wastingly-addictive (EverQuest, Quake CTF?)

    - Biggest thrills (Duke Nukem, Half-Life?)

    Their list (and the reasoning presented by the selectors) shows some kind of mish-mash of these things.

    --
    I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  217. Red Baron & Mechwarrior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF are they smoking. There's far too many FPS's in the list and they've left out Wolfenstein 3D the one that started it all. Obviously those guys don't play too many other types of games. The original Red Baron was a great WWI flight sim! Mechwarrior 2 was a great pseudo tank sim! What about Sim City? What about Tomb Raider & Myst?

    They've also left out all of the Aces of the ??? flight sims. And... the apple II wireframe flight sim. What about all the Scott Adams text adventures?! Ultima 1 & 2 sucked but Ultima 3 should have been there instead of 5. Ultima 5 was basically Ultima 4 with extra tiles and a few extra clues to solve. It should have been released as an expansion pack.

    Defender
    Robotron
    Pong
    Joust
    Gauntlet 2
    Asteroids
    Bostonian
    Galaga
    Pacman
    Lode Runner
    Frogger
    Spaceward Ho!