Slashdot Mirror


World's First XP System Sold

A reader writes "New zealands largest OEM PC Manufacturer, The PC Company sold the worlds first Windows XP system. Details can be found at this article on NZoom" And so, it begins.

371 comments

  1. And next by sheriff_p · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The spate of conspiracy theories linking some aspect of WinXP to the number 666 or an obscure Nostradamus prediction...

    --
    Score:-1, Funny
  2. What??? by EGSonikku · · Score: 4, Funny

    What do you mean first XP system? Iv'e been running XP for several wee- err, first *sold* XP system. Never Mind.

    (The above is a complete falsity contrived to humor readers, any resemblence to actual people, places, or events is purely coincidental)

    .

    --
    - "Scientia non habet inimicum nisp ignorantem"
  3. Shipping already? by reverius · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is Windows XP shipping already, or is it only starting to ship on new computers now? Can it be bought in stores?

    1. Re:Shipping already? by Suppafly · · Score: 4, Informative

      generally, in the past, oem's have received new MS OS's some time before you can buy a non-oem version.

    2. Re:Shipping already? by D+Anderson+n'Swaart · · Score: 1

      Erm...there's always the chance I'm missing something, but may I ask why this is modded as flamebait? Moderators on crack, or a personal vendetta? Seems pretty relevant to me, and afaik it's accurate information...naturally, ianal (right?).

    3. Re:Shipping already? by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 1

      Have you MetaModerated Today :D

      Click that link to rate the moderator as unfair

      --
      ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
    4. Re:Shipping already? by unitron · · Score: 2

      It was probably his sig that did it. Should have included a &ltP&gt to keep it from looking like part of the comment.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    5. Re:Shipping already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft has signed off on the RTM release of WindowsXP. It is available through OEM and warez channels. It is not available through retail channels until October the 8th.

    6. Re:Shipping already? by Stoutlimb · · Score: 1

      I doubt it. Microsoft probably has some special, super-secret deals with OEM's. Can anyone with more knowlege shed some light on this?

      Bork!

  4. The question is by epsalon · · Score: 1

    How long till the customer opens the box, reads the EULA, and returns it.
    What would they say then?

  5. Uhmm... by Jamuraa · · Score: 0

    So what?

    We knew that systems were going to be sold with XP from OEM, why is this news? Gateway and Dell have been selling systems with free upgrades to XP personal edition for a month or so now.

    --
    You can't see this if you have sigs turned off.
  6. Whoo Hooo... So what? by jacobcaz · · Score: 1

    Great - The first XP system is shipped. It's not something that I will rush out and upgrade to, it's not something that I will recommend to my customers to rush out and upgrade to.

    Unfortunatly the massive crushing machine that is Microsoft will eventually make XP so ubiquitous that I will be forced to either buy a Mac or switch to FreeBSD 100% of the time.

    I guess I should switch to FreeBSD 100% and just buy and XBox for my games anyway.

    1. Re:Whoo Hooo... So what? by Yorrike · · Score: 1
      NEVER!


      If you want a game machine, get a GameCube. X-Box is, by far, the worst piece of hardware I have ever had the displeasure of using.

      --

      Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

    2. Re:Whoo Hooo... So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want a game machine, get a GameCube. X-Box is, by far, the worst piece of hardware I have ever had the displeasure of using.

      How the fuck did you manage to have the "displeasure" of using one if they haven't even been released yet?

    3. Re:Whoo Hooo... So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the fsck did you manage to get to work on time unless you ran a red light on the way in?

      Not everybody obeys all the laws, poindexter. Some people have the spine for living under their own codes. The rest of you can go back to your fitter, happier, more productive lives.

    4. Re:Whoo Hooo... So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh stop trying to sound all mysterious, you played it at a video game show like everyone else.

      wanker.

  7. Lack of imagination by alnapp · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, I suppose that if your imagination only runs to the extent of calling a PC company "The PC Company" its not suprising you'll be first in line for Mr Gate's latest.

  8. Slashdot 'em! Great Way To Stop XP Sales! by Lethyos · · Score: 2

    Now, besides the fact that this is one of the more useless pieces of news posted to Slashdot, it also happens to be a great strategy. By posting story links to PC manufacturers who sell PC's with Windows XP pre-loaded, we can effectively shut-down their online sales services to prevent customers from buying said systems. Great way to beat MS! :)

    --
    Why bother.
  9. The answer is by Fweeky · · Score: 2, Funny

    As if anybody in their right mind reads the EULA.

    As if anybody would even care what it said if they did - it could lay claim to your first born for all the difference it makes to 99.999% of users.

    1. Re:The answer is by Kruemelmo · · Score: 1
      mysql> DELETE FROM world.human_race WHERE iq < 100;
      Query OK, 3.45 billion rows affected (0.01 sec)
      What a tasteless signature.
      Sorry for being offtopic.
    2. Re:The answer is by Sam+Jooky · · Score: 1
      mysql> DELETE FROM world.human_race WHERE iq Query OK, 3.45 billion rows affected (0.01 sec)
      What a tasteless signature.
      Sorry for being offtopic.
      Well, there aren't any rules against letting Nazis use /., too.
    3. Re:The answer is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3.45 billion rows in 0.01 secs... Amazing, i need to get me one of those dual 2.2GHz machines as well...

    4. Re:The answer is by Karn · · Score: 1

      Nice sig.

      That reminds me of football players in high school kicking nerds asses just b/c they were physically superior to them, just because they could.

      How's it feel to be one of them?

      --


      Why do I keep typing pythong?
    5. Re:The answer is by aka-ed · · Score: 1

      No offense, but this question translates as, "How does it feel not to have grown up?"

      Not every so-called jock beat on so-called nerds. The distinction between "jocks" and "nerds" is not so sharp as the distinction between the emotionally stunted and those who have achieved maturity.

      Sorry for being off-topic...

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
  10. Linux can't compete! by Bollie · · Score: 1

    Too bad, we'll never be able to match that headline. Linux'll never sell... Oh wait! ;-)

  11. Well, by Jin+Wicked · · Score: 1

    if it makes you feel any better, I'm still using Windows98.

    --
    My Webcomic: Asylum on 5th Street
    1. Re:Well, by ThePilgrim · · Score: 1

      Well I just upgraded from Win 95 to 98 last week

      --
      Wouldn't it be nice if schools got all the money they wanted and the army had to hold jumble sales for guns
    2. Re:Well, by NMerriam · · Score: 2

      One of the guys in my office (actually the HEAD of one of our tech groups!) is still using Win95 original. Can't even use USB devices (which is what will force him to upgrade eventually).

      He's very utilitarian, and the system works for him, so why change it? Of course we kid him relentlessly every time it crashes...

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    3. Re:Well, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Win98 first edition for games and Debian for everything else. When I first heard about Whistler (as it was then), I thought "great, I'll probably get that". The more I hear about XP, the more I like my current OSs.

    4. Re:Well, by ScumBiker · · Score: 1

      I _finally_ upgraded to Dos 6.26 last week...

      --
      --- Think of it as evolution in action ---
    5. Re:Well, by WNight · · Score: 2

      I still use WinNT Workstation at work. It'd be the original 5-year old install, except that the HD it was on barfed.

      For gaming I use 2k at home because 98 started to piss me off (and Millenium is a joke) but at work I don't need USB or Direct X, which are imho the two main differences. It also means I'm fairly happy on a 233MMX with 128MB, except when I do compiles. That wouldn't cut it for a 2k machine.

    6. Re:Well, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't Whistler actually 2000, not XP?

    7. Re:Well, by Petrol · · Score: 1

      erm, me too.
      *But* I did finally jump into the water and install the Mandrake 8.0 release last night.

      Good god, i had to do something to get away from M$. Damn EQ keeps me coming back. ;)

      --
      ...and that's the end of our show. Donk!
    8. Re:Well, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still using the NT 4.0 that came on this Dell Box. It works fine and I can't see that it'll ever need to be reinstalled. This is the case for most Windows users. (the average Slashdot warez freak who crams new Tucows crap onto his system daily isn't the typical Windows user).

      Of course, if our local Net-help staff had their way they would have 'imaged' the machine as it came in and I'd be just as screwed as the average user here at work. What a bunch of clowns. It's just pitiful the kind of lusers who work in IT these days....

      Hey Poindexter, come change the toner cartridge, kay?

  12. One minute after midnight? by DwarfGoanna · · Score: 1, Insightful

    leaving the Auckland showroom at one minute after midnight with a brand new, Windows XP-ready machine.


    I take this to mean people are actually standing in line for this? Isn't today's PC consumer a little smarter than they were in '95 and '98? Have we learned nothing? I mean, doesn't everybody read /.?


    =)

    --

    "You know why you do not see me styling wit my homies? Because I have no homies!!" -Mojo Jojo

    1. Re:One minute after midnight? by xpurple · · Score: 1

      Why would they learn? For the greater part, most people try to avoid learning.

      I do tech support for a living, this gives me a unique view of society (if not a totaly warped one).

      --
      http://www.xpurple.com
    2. Re:One minute after midnight? by biglig2 · · Score: 2

      Oh, it's a PR stunt.... not a real indicator of demand.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    3. Re:One minute after midnight? by tconnors · · Score: 2, Funny

      leaving the Auckland showroom at one minute after midnight with a brand new, Windows XP-ready machine.

      I take this to mean people are actually standing in line for this? Isn't today's PC consumer a little smarter than they were in '95 and '98? Have we learned nothing? I mean, doesn't everybody read /.?


      A little smarter? You missed the part in the quote about being an All Black. For those not living in this part of the world, an All Black is a football player for the New Zealand team. Now football players never really were renouned for being smart people, so I think that probably explains everything.

      TimC.

    4. Re:One minute after midnight? by jacoplane · · Score: 1

      Dude....it's Rugby, not Football

    5. Re:One minute after midnight? by serial+frame · · Score: 1

      What Americans call 'football' is actually gridiron, mind you.

      --

      -
      And the Angel said unto me, "These are the cries of the carrots! The cries of the carrots!"
    6. Re:One minute after midnight? by unitron · · Score: 2
      The Register has a story with a little more detail. It was a rugby player buying a computer for his parents.

      Gee, inflicting XP on Mom and Dad. Insert reverse child abuse jokes here.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    7. Re:One minute after midnight? by tconnors · · Score: 1

      Dude....it's Rugby, not Football

      Rather offtopic now, but I thought it was still a variety of football. You play with your feet (sort of). Of course, I don't follow the damn sport, and the only real football is Australian rules :P

      'course, even that sucks.

      TimC.

    8. Re:One minute after midnight? by rossdee · · Score: 1

      the definition of 'football' is different for different countries.

      in New Zealand football means 'rugby union'
      in parts of australia football means 'rugby league'
      in other parts of australia football means 'aussie rules'
      in europe football means soccer
      in USA of course its grid iron

    9. Re:One minute after midnight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh. just why I got out of the support business...

  13. All Black by visualight · · Score: 2, Troll
    All Black Doug-Howlett became The PC Company's first customer, leaving the Auckland showroom at one minute after midnight with a brand new, Windows XP-ready machine.


    Does that mean Doug-Howlett's a black guy? I've never heard "all black" before. If that's what it means, I think it's funny the NZ press thinks that bit of info important enough to include. Or does it mean something else?

    --
    Samsung took back my unlocked bootloader because Google wants me to rent movies. They're both evil.
    1. Re:All Black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The All Blacks are NZ's national rugby team.

    2. Re:All Black by underpaidISPtech · · Score: 1

      i think it is the name of a rugby team, hence he must be a rugby star.

    3. Re:All Black by nagora · · Score: 4, Informative
      It means he plays Rugby for the national team, who play in black shorts, boots, socks, and shirts, and are generally referred to as "The All Blacks".

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    4. Re:All Black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All Blacks are the name of the national rugby team, rugby being the national game. The national colours are black, hence the name. It has nothing to do with his skin colour.

    5. Re:All Black by bfree · · Score: 5, Informative

      Congratulations, you have passed slashdot's "you are a dumb insular American test"! Just kidding :-)

      While Americans ignore most of the worlds sport and simply invent their own to have American World Champions, many countries play the same sports! This reference to "All Black" refers to the New Zealand Rugby Union team who are historically one of the most respected and best forces in Rugby. They are called All Blacks as their strip is all black! The press are mentioning this as it was obviously a publicity stunt by The PC Company to ensure greter coverage in their native NZ (and in fact it is a good enough gimmic to probably get some attention outside NZ). A quick look at a google search and this page also suggests Mr. Howlett might have been chosen as "the fastest man in NZ rugby". I guess we won't really know unless someone can show us the material The PC Company are putting out.

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    6. Re:All Black by styrotech · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Tell that to the Wallabies.

      Aussie Aussie Aussie


      Heh - he did say 'historically'

      We will rise again! Without the mighty John Eales to protect you, we will crush you like the ants you are! Mwahahahahahaha!!!!!!

    7. Re:All Black by mollusk · · Score: 1

      The All Blacks are New Zealand's national rugby team. He probably has some sort of celebrity status

      --
      The Revolution. Now available as a convienent six tape series from PBS.
    8. Re:All Black by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      All Blacks = NZ rugby team
      All Whites = NZ Soccer team
      Tall Blacks = NZ Basketball team
      Black Caps = NZ Cricket team

      You get the picture...
      Any sport team in NZ will probably have either 'black' or 'all' in the name.

    9. Re:All Black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All Black = US Olympic Basketball Team.

    10. Re:All Black by jd · · Score: 2

      It also means he can do a Maori war-chant at the start of the game, and behead the players of the losing team. :)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    11. Re:All Black by unitron · · Score: 2
      "The real nagora is /. user #177841, but he is an imposter."

      Says who? The unreal nagora?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    12. Re:All Black by oob · · Score: 1

      Here's the story of how New Zealand's rugby team became known as the "All Blacks."

      New Zealand began playing rugby internationally in 1888, wearing a navy blue uniform with gold fern on the breast. By the time of the 1905 "Originals" tour of Great Britain this had changed to a black uniform with white fern on the breast.

      After the New Zealand side had demolished England at Twickenham, the Times newspaper headlined an article which was supposed to read "All Backs" (no L) in reference to the running rugby that New Zealand played, even amongst the forwards. The Times misprinted the headline "All Blacks" and the name has stuck since.

    13. Re:All Black by why-is-it · · Score: 2

      Does that mean Doug-Howlett's a black guy? I've never heard "all black" before. If that's what it means, I think it's funny the NZ press thinks that bit of info important enough to include. Or does it mean something else?

      (sigh) The New Zealand national rugby team is called the "all blacks" mainly because their uniform is - get this - all black.

      This was modded up for being insightful? WTF?

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    14. Re:All Black by nagora · · Score: 1
      "The real nagora is /. user #177841, but he is an imposter."

      Says who? The unreal nagora?

      He is an imposter of someone else.

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    15. Re:All Black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actualy there aren't many people of African descent in New Zealand

    16. Re:All Black by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      many countries play the same sports!

      Yeah, I played on my high school's cricket team, and we got our asses handed to us by an team from India (okay, so they were also the equivelent of a university team, so I don't feel horrible).

      America's a pretty big place. Outside of the big few televised sports, we have plenty of local sports as well, several being "world sports". My older brother played la crosse and rugby. I did wrestling, golf and cricket. (Jack Nicholas's kids went to my high school, and he spent a few practices each year with the team.. not that it helped my game.)

      Congratulations, you have passed Slashdot's "you believe Americans are as they appear in their pop media test"! Just serious. :-P Applying the same logic, Ozzies (which are Australians *and* people from New Zealand) live in the middle of a desert (no cities) and drink beer all night after hunting crocodiles all day (all "you" have sent us are Max Max, Crocodile Dundee, Reckless Kelly and Steve Erwin, so... ). (And assuming NZ and Australia are the same country is a bit like assuming all of America is the same. We're the United States, and many states are damn proud of their individual identity.)

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    17. Re:All Black by 0dB · · Score: 1

      Ozzies (which are Australians *and* people from New Zealand)

      You might ponder on the other spelling of "Ozzies" ("Aussies"), and reconsider that statement.

      I'm afraid that, like it or not, the stereotype of the Americans being insular is well deserved. Considering how far most of the population have to travel before they have to speak a different language, this is understandable. However, it is a shame they can't take a joke - note the "Troll" rating, despite the fact that the rest of the world really does consider the "World Series" as a laughably self-important title considering the number of different countries that participate.

    18. Re:All Black by bfree · · Score: 2

      Most importantly it was a joke dude :-)

      More seriously, every person is a unique individual and while certain predispositions (such as a propensity to post on slashdot) may incline that group to be more likely to have a certain view I strongly believe that no conclusions can ever be drawn about the individual. However when it comes to slashdot, a large percentage of the posters are American and when it comes to Americans a large percentage of them are very insular (be they in slashdot, media or just my humble experiences of all the Americans I have met ... and they were the ones who weren't in the states at the time!). Americans are tarred by the brush of the media in such a way that the individuality you love of the different states is washed away in the corporate melee to win the lowest common denominator market. In my country of Europe (hehe) the divisions of language are protecting the Sky's of this world from blending us into one culture.

      It was a joke, and one born of sarcasm, for the only things I probably dislike about slashdot (trolls, moderation etc. are all imperfect but I don't care). And finally I play cricket too, in Ireland!

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    19. Re:All Black by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      You might ponder on the other spelling of "Ozzies" ("Aussies"), and reconsider that statement.

      Okay, first, I was being light hearted about the whole thing, and second, that was my point with the use of "Ozzie" - that's why it was in quotes, and I immediately said the equivelent of "which means residents of New Zealand and Australia, because they are the same country". It was pointed humor.

      Before you judge America from what you see from where you're sitting, you should see what that region of the world looks like from here. Companies who do business here such as Fosters, and entertainers like Paul Hogan and Yahoo Serious, really promote the concept that Australia is populated by leathery men a little on the dim side, but good natured, and masculine women, all of whom do nothing but sit in the desert and drink beer.

      It's about as accurate as your view of America.

      Now, I'll tell you that I've been to Australia (which is why I jumped a bit west, as opposed to discussing New Zealand), had a great time, never saw a desert, saw no more beer consumption than here (and your beer sucks too. Thank ghod for Guinness), and had a great time in a city that could have easily been any in America. More to the point, everybody that I met was nice, laidback, cheered for the home team, and was pretty much the exact same as any American.

      On the internet, *if* you learn someone's nationality, they are probably either someone you've talked to for awhile, or an insufferable prick. I've seen "Brits are better than you Yanks", "French people smell (from a Japanese)", "Canadians suck, we Americans should just take them over", and "the stereotype of the Americans being insular is well deserved".

      "it is a shame they can't take a joke". Read back the post you're replying to. Read carefully. See humor? Then think about who can't take a joke.

      --
      Evan "Who will fly across the globe for Rocky Horror, and jump in on threads that have been old for 6000 years" E.

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    20. Re:All Black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silver Ferns = NZ netball team.
      NZ Hockey Team = NZ hockey team.

      Uh...

  14. EULA will be violated by epsalon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Most legitimate users will violate the EULA, by connecting to more than 10 computers (somebody said Internet?), or by installing VNC (which is explictly prohibited - but works great nonetheless) or by doing of the many things M$ says you cannot do.
    In short, you're better of pirating it.
    [Disclaimer: This message is for humor only and does not encourage piracy in any way nor does imply any resemblance to real facts.]

    1. Re:EULA will be violated by ConsumedByTV · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think it really is a sad day that you had to include that disclaimer ([Disclaimer: This message is for humor only and does not encourage piracy in any way nor does imply any resemblance to real facts.]). What ever happened to freedom?

      --


      "Not my manner of thinking but the manner of thinking of others has been the source of my unhappiness." - M
    2. Re:EULA will be violated by brunes69 · · Score: 2


      VNC is prohibited in he EULA? I never heard about this... where does it prohibit it?

    3. Re:EULA will be violated by Lostman · · Score: 2

      You are ABSOLUTELY right. When I get WinXP Pro (I am trying to maintain a basten against it as of yet) I am installing every damn thing I have on my current box -- including VNC.

      I am looking at that pretty white box as I speak right now -- I have been using it for over a month now and it has only gotten more useful to me.

      Will I violate the EULA? Yes...
      Do I really care? Nope...
      Does the EULA actually matter? Nope....

      Of course, an interesting problem with this is that remotely logging into your winxp box that is coding from your house is going to probably be stopped... while we may like telecommuting, employers may not like that their precious winxp licenses have been "invalidated" -- (invalidated my ass... when I buy software I BUY that copy.. feh)

    4. Re:EULA will be violated by really? · · Score: 1
      I am installing every damn thing I have on my current box -- including VNC

      But XPpro comes with its own "terminal server" so in many instances you won't need VNC - I loaded it anyway, as it provides consistency across platforms...

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    5. Re:EULA will be violated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I loaded it anyway as it provides consistency across platforms"

      Precisely. I wonder why Microsoft would want to discourage use of an open, open-source, free, cross-platform protocol in favour of their own terminal server? Hmm...

    6. Re:EULA will be violated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terminal server is a hell of a lot faster than VNC since it assumably passes win32 calls not compressed bitmaps in order to render the screen.

      Bad zealot, no donut.

    7. Re:EULA will be violated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to read the License addendum. It's written and posted on COLA. (comp.os.linux.advocacy- some of the world's most reasonable folks. hee!)

    8. Re:EULA will be violated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next thing we know, astroturfers like you will be trying to tell us that our /etc/termcap files aren't necessary any more.

      Long live the 4 mA current loop serial interface. Viva UNIX!!

    9. Re:EULA will be violated by swright · · Score: 1

      Aaah, but Remote Administrator is even faster... (and while not open source, is cheap and not made by MS)

    10. Re:EULA will be violated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares... who even reads the EULA... not me... who even has EVER paid for a M$ product i know i sure havent

  15. And hours later.... by nachoworld · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    the purchaser of the first WinXP system attempted to install the OS on his laptop so that he can take full advantage of the features on the road. Subsequently, a big 3D image of Bill Gates' head on a blue background encompassed the screen. Mr. Gates' single index finger then popped up and shook vigorously back and forth.

    The purchaser immediately had an MI, not because he hadn't read the EULA, but because anyone would be scared s**tless by Windows' "new and improved" blue screen of death, which will now shut down computers everywhere not because of hefty codework but because Mr. Gates' head doesn't like bad licensing.

    --

    ---
    I'm just an ordinary man with nothing to lose.
    1. Re:And hours later.... by gazbo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Indeed it is a sad world when a software company would dare to violate our civil liberties by designing an operating system that is hard to pirate.

      Thoughtless bastards - what next, people fitting 'locks' on doors to make it harder for burglars? Selfish fuckers.

    2. Re:And hours later.... by Scanline · · Score: 1

      Hard to pirate? It seems that all you have to do is download, burn and install, because from what I have seen on some boards a lot of clueless gamer kids are running XP.

      --
      "But I'm still like a little kid, see?
      I just don't know when to quit."
      - Rei
    3. Re:And hours later.... by NMerriam · · Score: 2

      Actually, use on a laptop had always been allowed before (as it was a "secondary" machine), same with Office.

      That's part of why people are bitching about it -- not only did they increase the price, they removed all the allowances for secondary machines, meaning corps will have to buy twice as many licenses for people who work on the road...

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
  16. 2hrs later .. by taniwha · · Score: 5, Funny

    M$ NZ gets its first XP tech support cal after the user added a new harddrive and XP told them they'd have to get permission from M$ before they continued ... and so it begins ...

    1. Re:2hrs later .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Stop whispering in my taringa damn you!

    2. Re:2hrs later .. by purplemonkeydan · · Score: 1

      Wota wanka.

      Installing a new hard disk does NOT trigger activation. I just recently put an extra 60Gb Western Digital in my XP RC1 machine, and it didn't even blink.

      Although I'm using RC1, from what reports I've seen, the RTM version will be even less stringent with activation.

    3. Re:2hrs later .. by Hadean · · Score: 2

      RTM is very much less stringent. I even changed my MOTHERBOARD (from KT133 to KT133A, since the former died on me for whatever reason). Maybe it was because it was the same company (ECS), but whatever the case: XP didn't say a thing...

    4. Re:2hrs later .. by mosch · · Score: 2

      no shit, monkeyboy. the paper on windows activation explains very clearly you have to change three things to flag it. Congrats on your new hard drive, now get some RAM, a faster processor and a new sound card. WHOOPS, you're over the limit. A Microsoft representative will be with you as soon as possible, please hold!

    5. Re:2hrs later .. by WildBeast · · Score: 1

      No, it states clearly that you have to change over 4 hardware components in the course of a 3 month period in order to be required to reactivate.

    6. Re:2hrs later .. by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      three components, four components, ten components - regardless almost it's beyond belief that people will put up with shit like this. Almost. But I read /. so I know just how many people dream of a good porkin' by Bill.

      If you weren't aware that you don't own Windows but rather rent it, and on lousy terms, before XP, you'll sure as hell figure it out now.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    7. Re:2hrs later .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if I'm a company and I have a major failure and have to use a different computer or I am doing a major hardware upgrade of all my systems? We normally have to do those at 2 in morning. What if XP doesn't like the changes? Am I down, losing thousands of dollars until a M$ rep can get back to me?

      Don't sound good to me.

    8. Re:2hrs later .. by Dwonis · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but you wouldn't use XP on a production server anyway. Right??

    9. Re:2hrs later .. by TeraCo · · Score: 1
      Well, given that it's a company that earns thousands of dollars at 2 in the morning, it's bound to have clustering or some sort of fall-over solution [including prebuilt backup servers that you can bring up at a flick of a switch].

      ALL of our mission critical sites have this, [even the non-24 hour ones].

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    10. Re:2hrs later .. by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Well, if its that important, I'm sure you'd have a site license, in which case no activation, if not I'm sure you'd shuck out an extra few bucks for another license, then stay on hold and loose thousands.

    11. Re:2hrs later .. by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      than, not then, I implided the opposite of what I was trying to say.

  17. Warning, You Will Be Flamed/Modded Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You realize that by admitting this on /.'s forums, you are subject to trolls, zealots, and retard moderators who will abuse you nearly to the point of suicide before getting bored with you and moving onto the next practical user who decides that Linux just isn't right for him/her yet.

    1. Re:Warning, You Will Be Flamed/Modded Down by Jin+Wicked · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Good God man, you're right! What on earth was I thinking?!



      The Evil Mr. Gates must be stopped! This cannot be allowed to come to pass...um...



      They already mod down everything I post when I don't even mention Windows. How is this any different from normal, again?

      --
      My Webcomic: Asylum on 5th Street
  18. Is it only me then? by Troed · · Score: 4, Interesting
    ... that can't understand why I should upgrade from Win2K to Windows XP? I admit to not being a Microsoft-follower, but so far I've completely failed to see what's so special about XP? It's got a new ugly look, that I've seen, but is there anything else?


    I'm actually serious - anyone? :)

    1. Re:Is it only me then? by ziggles · · Score: 1

      well..uh.. it starts about 20 seconds faster, is that worth upgrading? (NO!)

    2. Re:Is it only me then? by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      The ugly GUI is supposed to enchant you. Oh, and the fact that they now run all of your utilities for you under Start->Stop->Exit->Enter->Go->Leave ->Blankets->Cheese->Utilities->Pay

      But that should have been obvious from the get go.

      Silly human!

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    3. Re:Is it only me then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There are no benefits now, but IMO the most important feature of XP is the unified codebase meaning that there won't get the same hardware support problems as with w2k.

      That's about it, though.

    4. Re:Is it only me then? by gomerbud · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At least the transition between Mac OS 9 and OS X was significant. I find it really lame that microsoft keeps releasing the same crap just so that people are pressured to buy an upgrade. Sure, maybe XP is all candy coated with a cooler gui, but nothing much has changed except for the fact that normal users have access to raw network sockets.

      Microsoft claims that XP has better memory protection, better threading... I'm just waiting to see if any of this is true, or if XP has the same problems as 2k.

      --
      Kan jeg få en pils, vær så snill?
    5. Re:Is it only me then? by Osty · · Score: 5, Interesting

      nothing much has changed except for the fact that normal users have access to raw network sockets.

      Uh ... you'd be correct about the raw sockets if the original poster had mentioned Win9x/ME, but since he asked about upgrading from Win2k, that's a non-issue -- NT has always had raw sockets.


      Anyway, aside from the obvious GUI enhancements (which can easily be disabled by simply choosing to use the Classic theme, which also has the property of not really being a theme, and so doesn't use the resources other themes would), there are other niceties, like fast user switching (logout or switch to another user, but let your current user's applications continue to run), enhanced Terminal Services (aka, Remote Desktop), advanced video and imaging support built in, built-in firewalling (Win2k had packet filtering capabilities, but needed code to take advantage of that), enhanced file system encryption, better app compatibility (nice to have for those games that expect a user to be running win9x), better group policies, Cleartype (if he's using a laptop or LCD display), and more. Check out this feature chart for a better idea of what XP has that 2K doesn't.

    6. Re:Is it only me then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The problem is that non-privileged users have access to raw sockets. On unix, and older NT, only privileged users (and usually only root on most systems), can persuade the system to assemble custom raw packets on the sockets - that's why script kiddies tend to first have to "get r00t" on a box, before they can use the box to run their attacks.

      XP allows any user to do this, thus making XP's networking support massively more insecure and downright dangerous - it's like leaving an artillery gun and ammo on your front lawn, with a sign saying "new to these parts? feel free to come on in and use my artillery gun!"

      It's most likely some sort of illuminatus! -style ploy by Microsoft, so they can then say "look how insecure the current networking system is, time for everyone to stop using TCP/IP, and use our new patented, proprietary protocol instead", being careful not to mention that it was MS who unleashed the forthcoming XP script-kiddie hell on the 'net...

    7. Re:Is it only me then? by codeforprofit2 · · Score: 1

      More apps for home users. Microsoft says (but that don't make it true) that is shall have better performance when it comes to enterprise solutions. That should mean processhandling, socketshandling and memoryhandling, I guess we have to wait and see.

    8. Re:Is it only me then? by Sh4dowM4ge · · Score: 1

      * good for the economy: it requires you to upgrade your pc again to an Intel P4, which will in turn revive the economy and make Bill richer by the stocks that rise.
      * easier to install: you don't need to install any Service Packs, patches and fixes because the OS is new, and bugs need still to be discovered and exploited
      * 'Windows' branding: people will not know anymore which version of Windows they are running (there are so many...) so they just refer to it as 'Windows'.
      * licensing: you will have to pay for this version, so the next time poor MS will actually be able to write an Operating System.. NOT.
      * you have to keep hardware manufacturers busy with writing new drivers... they have the staff for this!
      * seriously? I have no f%$#king clue...

    9. Re:Is it only me then? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      ....like fast user switching (logout or switch to another user, but let your current user's applications continue to run), enhanced Terminal Services (aka, Remote Desktop), advanced video and imaging support built in, built-in firewalling...

      HMMMM.....sounds like Linux ;-)

      You to folks can have this "wonderful" "inovative" system

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    10. Re:Is it only me then? by Troed · · Score: 2
      Oki, thanks. The only reason for me to upgrade would thus be to replace the functionality I have now from other vendors with Microsoft tools instead :)


      I use:



      (I assume there are 3rd party products available since before to do the other stuff you mention - I don't need them. I also have no clue what that advanced imaging stuff is .. a replacement for ACDSee?)


      ... and all this boils down to one thing: Microsoft uses the dominance of their operating system to push their own products above 3rd party developers. Wasn't this what the DOJ were going to stop?

    11. Re:Is it only me then? by Bake · · Score: 1

      Well, the ACDSee replacement doesn't support the usual ACDSee shortcuts. And it doesn't support fullscreen (I mean, what good is watching windowed pr0n? ;)

      Also, the DVD player in the Media Player doesn't work as well as it should.

      But the rest of the tools seem to be OK.

    12. Re:Is it only me then? by jd · · Score: 2
      It has all-new licencing clauses, entitling them to your first-born child, your bank accounts, and any money you might make when using XP. :)


      Seriously, with GWB's war on terror, I'm not surprised they released the OS in New Zealand first.


      AFAIK, there's really very little in XP that you can't get by marauding Microsoft's official and unofficial upgrades, patches and other assorted manglings. Though I suggest checking the EULA for any "Unlicenced Marauding" clause.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    13. Re:Is it only me then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i have been using it for a few months and i think it depends on the user. if you are going to play games and want all of your hardware to work right away, its worth upgrading. i havent had any trouble yet no blue screens, no crashes, no problems at all.

      maybe they hired some good programmers this time because so far, for me at least, it actually works.

    14. Re:Is it only me then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of those features are 100% useless to 90% of the computing world.

      So exactly why should anyone upgrade from Windows 98 then? Me is just 98 with new pretty fade in menus... XP gives me the hassles of the NT world.

      Exactly why again do I need to upgrade?

    15. Re:Is it only me then? by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      I'm actually serious - anyone?

      No, if you were "actually serious," you wouldn't ask why you should upgrade your copy of Windows on Slashdot...

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    16. Re:Is it only me then? by omidk · · Score: 0

      except third party programs are easy to install and they dont suck!

    17. Re:Is it only me then? by atlep · · Score: 1

      >>>>there are other niceties, like fast user switching (logout or switch to another user, but let your current user's applications continue to run),

      This is not a nicety(?), this is required and long overdue. Having to close all program and log off just to make small changes requiring Admin access has pissed me off more than once.
      >>>>better app compatibility (nice to have for those games that expect a user to be running win9x)

      Now maybe it will be possible to play games on a dual prosessor system?

      -----

      I have a simple teory. All the problems with Windows (unstability, lack of niceties as mnetioned above etc.) are deliberate, forcing users to always want an upgrade.

      M$ is not widely known for playing nice, so why not?

    18. Re:Is it only me then? by throx · · Score: 2

      Having to close all program and log off just to make small changes requiring Admin access has pissed me off more than once.

      You never just used the 'Run As...' option in Win2k? Man, I can see why you would be upset.

      --

      Fear: When you see B8 00 4C CD 21 and know what it means

    19. Re:Is it only me then? by throx · · Score: 2

      The problem is that non-privileged users have access to raw sockets.

      Wrong. Write some test code, or look at the test code from my previous post. You try to use raw sockets as a non-admin user in XP and you get EACCESS.

      Gibson is telling you lies.

      --

      Fear: When you see B8 00 4C CD 21 and know what it means

    20. Re:Is it only me then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't. Don't Upgrade. Thanks for calling.

    21. Re:Is it only me then? by SilentChris · · Score: 2

      I agree. Although I have found XP less reliable, the added GUI benefits have more than doubled my speed in using the machine. It's a tradeoff.

    22. Re:Is it only me then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would it matter, anyways? XP is made for home systems. As a home system, you're likely to be running as administrator or have access to it! If you're running it in an office environment, you're not likely to be issuing DoS attacks in the first place.

      And anyone who really WANTS to manipulate the TCP packets will do so regardless. XP isn't "promoting" it in any way.

      So what's the problem?

    23. Re:Is it only me then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody's forcing you to upgrade. Yet. Win95 is still supported and it's like 6 years old. I'd say you have a few good years left in that 98 system of your.

      However, XP is inherently more stable than 98 due to the better memory protection of the NT kernel. Of course bad drivers can still take you down, but I've yet to have an app trash memory so badly that I need to reboot. This was common in 98.

      Despite many claims of bloat, I find XP to be faster than 98 as well.

    24. Re:Is it only me then? by gomerbud · · Score: 1

      Are you telling me that an excel macro cannot start a DoS attack???

      --
      Kan jeg få en pils, vær så snill?
    25. Re:Is it only me then? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      suck is a reletive term, most people who get violent and begin to insult and attack somthing usualy do not understand it.

      you can't figure out how to use RPM? buy some software from thekompany.com it installes just like Winblows.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  19. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, you're right. What the hell is with that. Is it some weird lingo or what.

  20. There goes the neighborhood by LazyDawg · · Score: 1

    According to http://www.grc.com , Microsoft's networking and insecurities in the face of viruses, random strangers running arbitrary code, and all the security holes in XP and NT are either a deliberate attack against the Internet, or a criminally negligent source of problems for all.

    Untrained Windows users are not very good network citizens, especially when they stick to out of the box default configurations. Untrained Linux and BSD users have simmilar problems, but with Windows the ignorance is much more apparent.

    When SirCam was going around I kept getting the same bunch of people asking for my advice. They didn't believe me when I told them they had a virus, stating that their prot software didn't pick it up. Now an OS with even more holes, designed to be a merger between NT and Wintendo is going to be on the net, phoning home, sending out all kinds of privacy invading data, and making the 'net a little busier. Great.

    --
    "Look at me, I invented the stove!" -- Ben Franklin
    1. Re:There goes the neighborhood by underpaidISPtech · · Score: 1
      Mr. Gibson is IMNHO, an alarmist in regards to the networking code in XP.

      I don't believe that the Internet will crumble under the weight of packeting XP boxes. Is your local cable or dsl network under siege by all the s'kiddies using *nix? No.


      On the other hand, maybe MS has plans to implement a computer operator license $$$cheme, similar to a driver's license? After all, at some point, something deleterious is going to happen from the misuse of Windows ( SirCam, CodeRed, Nimda, -- I'm still getting hit by that shit) Ah, the mind dreams strange things on the graveyard shift....

      I think that given a differnt economic climate and a killer app, that XP could be as revolutionary as Win 95. I've only seen an early build of XP, but it's Tonka Truck/Fisher Price look and feel is nice and non-intimidating, kinda like a whizz-bang Flashed-out website. I think most users will love it. I work tech support, I know how much something like this is what people want and need. Easy to use. Just like the TV.

      Not everyone is a slashdotter after all.

    2. Re:There goes the neighborhood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may be easy to use, but they've managed to suck the computing out of computing - XP, even more so than eari
      lier MS OSes, seems designed to encourage users NOT to learn, so that the societal divide, with ms-programmer-priests in their temple, and dumb users who will always be reliant on them, and never be able to really control all the computing power they paid for, is preserved.

      With systems like the fabled amiga of yore, linux, and so on, tools are provided with the system to the user, so that (s)he can tinker with using a computer as a programmable computer -i.e. every box has some sort of language suitable for producing programs that can use the full power of the machine easily. With wondws, you get anaemic vbscript, and have to pay MS heftily for a decent programming environment, thus ensuring hobbyist coders remain few and far between for the windows platform.

    3. Re:There goes the neighborhood by underpaidISPtech · · Score: 1
      I agree with you there, but the thing is that most users couldnt give a crap about leveraging their computing power. Sad but true. I feel strongly that the general public wants the computer to operate more like an appliance. Nobody ever had difficulty figuring out an atari or playstation -- or at least not much. :)

      For the rest of us, we have *nix. Besides, clueless users, lo how I despise them, keep me in a job.
      Just wish I didn't have to deal with them over the phone.

    4. Re:There goes the neighborhood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr. Gibson is IMNHO, a retard.

    5. Re:There goes the neighborhood by Teferi · · Score: 2

      Been listening to 2112 a bit much lately, have we? :)

      Seriously, though, I'm with you on that. I don't like using an OS that discourages me from messing with it.
      ...for that matter, I like being able to mess with all of my stuff.

      --
      -- Veni, vidi, dormivi
  21. Windows in not sucking shocker. by Fweeky · · Score: 5, Informative

    XP, basically being a polished 2k, is nice and stable - 12 days playing games, installing crap, uninstalling crap, hibernating almost every night and generally Doing Stuff isn't bad.

    I finally rebooted it when it took a worryingly long time to hibernate (this, to the uninitiated, involves writing all memory out to disk, suspending drivers etc so the system can come back up in it's original state) - which I think's fair enough, seeing as it's quite a large task to ask any OS to do.

    XP also happens to boot very fast.. in fact, it's faster than coming out of hibernation here, and certainly comparible to an equivilent Unix system.

    Most of the new GUI stuff's a bit crap, but you can turn it all off with ease. The KLIK[tm] support for networking's quite nice, with bridging, NAT etc available with a few mouseclicks. It even sets up a firewall when you set up networking, and (*shock* *horror*), it's actually quite good.

    It performs at least as well as 2k, with tweaks in most of the right places, hence making it Quite Good[tm]. And it runs vim, UT, Q3 and CS - what more could you ask for? :)

    1. Re:Windows in not sucking shocker. by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      WOW!!! 12 days up time!!!!! yep that is a real improovemnet in stability over ME and 9x.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    2. Re:Windows in not sucking shocker. by eMilkshake · · Score: 1

      No, the reason to upgrade is simple: ClearType. Pretty! At least on my dual 17" flat panels. ;) Of course, critics say it makes the same stupid bubble letters the mac has had for years, but still, it's pretty.

    3. Re:Windows in not sucking shocker. by CyberGarp · · Score: 1

      I worked on a system that had a "hibernate" feature back in 1990. Every minute it would save the current state of the computer to disk to the "hibernate" file so that it could return to it's current state after a reboot. The code that ran on it was attrociously horrible. So it would get into a state that would cause a crash and reboot back to the last state it was in, ~30 seconds back on average. What happened next, well it rebooted again and again and again and again and again and again, add in-finitum. They would have to reinstall the software to get it to stop.

      My first task at getting my hands on it was deleting all "hiberation" features and then rewriting the main system using a methodology. Worked much better, there were no reboots except during lightning strikes. And "hiberation" was completely unnecessary in a properly designed system. Turned out the "hiberation" feature was added because there were too many reboots and loss of computations.

      So now Windoze has adopted this wonderful brain fart of logic. Screw your system and make it permanenent. You gotta love it, Bill told you so.

      --

      I used to wonder what was so holy about a silent night, now I have a child.
    4. Re:Windows in not sucking shocker. by why-is-it · · Score: 2

      It even sets up a firewall when you set up networking, and (*shock* *horror*), it's actually quite good.

      It's not a firewall. It is merely a packet filter.
      It is not a replacement for proper host-based firewall code or a stand-alone firewall unit.

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    5. Re:Windows in not sucking shocker. by really? · · Score: 1

      XP, as well as win2k before it, get around that by giving you a choice the second time around. I can't remember the win2k message, but it something like "It look like the previous ... blah blah blah. Do you want to ... or ..."

      All in all I would say that if someone is using Win ME, s/he shoud consider moving to XP. Nothing really compelling to make me move from win2k though.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    6. Re:Windows in not sucking shocker. by Jethro · · Score: 2

      I have to agree. This is the first Font Technology where I can actually see the difference. Antialiased fonts do nothing for me, really, but this ClearType thing is wonderful.

      Or was before I nuked WinXP and put Win2K back on. And then nuked Win2K and put WinME back on. Apparently Win2K doesn't like my SBLive.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    7. Re:Windows in not sucking shocker. by Jethro · · Score: 2

      I don't know if I'd call WinXP "a polished Windows 2000". More like "Windows 2000 with a lot of shiney plastic tacked on." In fact, I'm sure that if there was a software way of doing it, Windows XP would turn your machine casing translucent.

      I gave it a whirl a while ago and gave up on it for one reason - drivers.

      Sure, it autodetected my GeForce2GTS, and it worked fine - to a degree. No TVOUT and no Video Capture support. The maker of the card (ASUS) haven't released a WinXP driver yet. Installing the Win2K drivers made the machine hang on boot (worth a try though).

      Also, it detected my SBLive. And that played the System Beeps very well. However, it totally chokes on anything complicated, like games. Max Payne turned into Max Hedrom ("It's P-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-payne!"). No games were actually playable, and the graphics seemd strained, too.

      To be fair, Windows 2000 has the exact same problems on my machine, even with the Official Drivers installed, which may be a worse problem than it sounds like.

      It's back to WinME for my Gaming Needs, and Win98SE for my Video Capture needs. Trible-boot, the only way to go.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    8. Re:Windows in not sucking shocker. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      always talking bad about windows... dont you guys do noyhing better in your life, sure M$ sux but its time we start saying what is bad and should be fixed more than saying stupid things.
      i tested xp and its an ok OS, its way better then the old ones but still sux a litle bit.

    9. Re:Windows in not sucking shocker. by Keith+Russell · · Score: 2
      Sure, it autodetected my GeForce2GTS...


      The video card drivers that come with Windows (any version) don't enable any advanced features, which is par for the course. NVIDIA has released new DetonatorXP drivers that, at least on my Hercules GF2 Pro/Win 2000 combo, supported TV Out. I don't know if they'll handle vidcap on your ASUS card or not.

      Also, it detected my SBLive...


      Well, there's your problem. SBLive just doesn't get along with Windows 2000. I have yet to find a driver that doesn't suck. There's a new release from Creative that, among other things, enables AC-3 passthrough. Hopefully, they'll be more stable than the current set, which cost me a damn fine war scepter for my paladin. (A pox on Diablo II's waypoints!)
      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    10. Re:Windows in not sucking shocker. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, critics say it makes the same stupid bubble letters the mac has had for years, but still, it's pretty.

      ... and those critics are, unfortunately for them, sadly misguided. If they stopped listening to Steve Gibson when he's on crack for just a second, and actually investigated it, they'd see that he was actually COMPLETELY wrong.

    11. Re:Windows in not sucking shocker. by spectecjr · · Score: 2

      I worked on a system that had a "hibernate" feature back in 1990. Every minute it would save the current state of the computer to disk to the "hibernate" file so that it could return to it's current state after a reboot. The code that ran on it was attrociously horrible. So it would get into a state that would cause a crash and reboot back to the last state it was in, ~30 seconds back on average. What happened next, well it rebooted again and again and again and again and again and again, add in-finitum. They would have to reinstall the software to get it to stop.

      My first task at getting my hands on it was deleting all "hiberation" features and then rewriting the main system using a methodology. Worked much better, there were no reboots except during lightning strikes. And "hiberation" was completely unnecessary in a properly designed system. Turned out the "hiberation" feature was added because there were too many reboots and loss of computations.

      So now Windoze has adopted this wonderful brain fart of logic. Screw your system and make it permanenent. You gotta love it, Bill told you so.


      Do yourself a favor. Look up what "Hibernate" means on Windows - because you're talking through your arse if you think that what it means on Windows is what you're describing above.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    12. Re:Windows in not sucking shocker. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, considering I was lucky to get 4 days out of Win98SE on average...

    13. Re:Windows in not sucking shocker. by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      "Apparently Win2K doesn't like my SBLive."

      Hmmm.. you might want to check your motherboard. I've got an ABIT KT7A-RAID. And the ABIT newsgroup if full of people having problems with the SB Live range. I think any Mobo that has a Via KT133A chipset will have this problem. Just search google for 'via, southbridge bug'.

    14. Re:Windows in not sucking shocker. by Josuah · · Score: 1
      I finally rebooted it when it took a worryingly long time to hibernate (this, to the uninitiated, involves writing all memory out to disk, suspending drivers etc so the system can come back up in it's original state) - which I think's fair enough, seeing as it's quite a large task to ask any OS to do.


      I don't know about that being "fair enough". Connectix has supported writing out the entire system to disk so you can come back up to Windows as if you never shut down with their VirtualPC product line. And I don't recall ever having trouble with the write out/read in time there. Of course the entire emulation was slower than an actual x86 Windows machine, but the "hibernation" doesn't require any Windows emulation.

      Also, it seems to me that if there is some point at which the hibernation process takes exceptionally long to complete, then there is something very wrong. Perhaps a memory leak, or disk paging problem, or something like that. In which case, the hibernation process might actually corrupt your system state. And that's definitely a bad thing.
  22. WinXP is just Windows 2000 SE! by Jim+Norton · · Score: 1

    Yeah, so it begins alright... another rehashed OS with a huge hype machine behind it. WinXP is the equivalent of Windows 98 SE. Nothing really new here, just a bunch of integrated utilities and a revamped configuration system.

    --
    -- Jim
    1. Re:WinXP is just Windows 2000 SE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WinXP is the equivalent of Windows 98 SE. Nothing really new here,

      Nothing new except for the fact that it runs on a completely different kernel.

    2. Re:WinXP is just Windows 2000 SE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I'm not sure exactly how much you understand about XP. From your post, not much. You have to understand, if you are a 9x/ME user, this is a radical update!

      I think that the new apps (rudimentary fire wall but better than nothing, remote control, integrated hailstorm, etc) are worth while. May not for an upgrader for 2k who already has similar apps, but for a new user or corporate user, yes they are. If you are upgrading from ME/9x, you are getting a whole lot of stuff. Security (file level), stability, and NTFS.

      There appear to be some changes to NTFS.. I don't have details, but the boot files seem to be different. Also support for GPT. In fact, I believe for the 64-bit XP, only GPT will be supported.

      Also promises of DLL-hell being finally solved. Both Windows and Linux users can related to that one :)

      And all this... without having to recompile the kernel!

    3. Re:WinXP is just Windows 2000 SE! by Teferi · · Score: 2

      I've never had DLL hell in the three years I've been using Linux.
      (Debian unstable the entire time, from potato to woody to sid)
      (Not to be a knee-jerk linux zealot here; I never had DLL hell in the half a year I ran FreeBSD, either. :))
      For that matter, I've never had problems with DLL hell on my Win98 box, either. Just lucky, I guess...

      --
      -- Veni, vidi, dormivi
    4. Re:WinXP is just Windows 2000 SE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You better believe they changed NTFS! If you dual-boot Win2000 and XP, you better not be planning on accessing XP's NTFS drives from 2000, because from what I've heard, you can't. XP uses NTFS 5.1 and 2000 uses 5.0.

      Anyone know how well the Linux NTFS drivers handle the XP NTFS?

    5. Re:WinXP is just Windows 2000 SE! by TeraCo · · Score: 1

      Have you had rpm hell?

      rpm -i python-dev-blah
      Error: Can not install python-dev-blah, you need the latest ssl libraries.

      Aha! I think, I'll go and install the latest open-ssh, but I can't because:

      rpm -i latest-open-ssh
      Error: Installing the latest open ssh would break all of these apps. [Include Samba and about 20 more]

      rpm -U latest-open-ssh
      Error: Can't do this upgrade, because it would break all of that stuff up there.

      Not wanting to admit defeat, I went to speak to the local linux guru [and the trust second linux guru]. Neither of them could give me any useful advise short of 'uninstall all of those dependancies and reinstall'.

      Not wanting to do this, I did a forced install of the open-ssh thinking 'Ha, they are likely to be backwards compatable. But alas they were not, and I broke my samba install [among other things].

      A few minutes of diligent panicing later, I managed to uninstall everything and reinstall the old version. [Debian is looking pretty tempting right about now.]

      Alas, I still have no python installed.

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    6. Re:WinXP is just Windows 2000 SE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually we can see XP NTFS fine from Win2K.
      It may be that you need a certain service pack level on Win2K.

    7. Re:WinXP is just Windows 2000 SE! by Teferi · · Score: 2

      Mmm-hmm.
      RPM hell was the driving force behind my switching from RedHat 5.9 to Debian potato long ago. :)
      Go with debian, apt/dpkg never seems to mess up like that for me.

      --
      -- Veni, vidi, dormivi
  23. Very important! by Nickus · · Score: 1

    I just wanted to say that this was probably the most important news that been published on slashdot this year. How can this possible be "Stuff that matters"?
    Could you please also tell me who will be the first one to download their first servicepack?

    1. Re:Very important! by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      "I just wanted to say that this was probably the most important news that been published on slashdot this year. How can this possible be "Stuff that matters"? Could you please also tell me who will be the first one to download their first servicepack?"

      KK, I might not be the most interesting news of the day. But if you think it's so boring, and doesn't matter. Why go though the effort to even post about it? It's not like your the first person to bring this issue up at /. or anything.

      If it dosn't interest you, just ignore it. Or goto kuro5hin.org. Or start up your own web-site, where you can post stuff that you think that matters.
      The slashcode is there waiting for you...

  24. Im using WinXP beta, cant wait to buy it. by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

    Then I can call tech support and bitch about the Nvidia driver that comes installed with no opengl support, and the new Nvidia Driver that wont play the new CS1.3 patch.

    So far, i really like WinXP the font enhancements that didnt make it into Win2K are awesome. Turn off all the extra junk, its pretty much like Win2k, thou its more compatible with older programs. Dos stuff works now, with sound even.

    Need to run sandrasoft on it and see what the benchmarks are like thou....

    1. Re:Im using WinXP beta, cant wait to buy it. by Osty · · Score: 1

      Then I can call tech support and bitch about the Nvidia driver that comes installed with no opengl support, and the new Nvidia Driver that wont play the new CS1.3 patch.

      You must either be using an old beta, or having some sort of hardware problems, because the RC1 I'm running installed nVidia's 12.41 Detonator driver, and worked perfectly fine with DX and OpenGL. I'm now running the latest 21.xx driver in nVidia's Detonator XP series, and it works flawlessly. Granted, I don't play Half-Life or CS, but Quake 3, UT, Red Faction, Black & White, Giants, Startopia, Wolf3D MP test, etc all work beautifully.


      And for benchmarking, you should head over to MadOnion and grab 3DMark2001, as that's the "standard" benchmark used for graphics these days (to the point where Max Payne actually published minimum 3DMark2k1 scores as part of the required and recommended specs on the box).

    2. Re:Im using WinXP beta, cant wait to buy it. by dostick · · Score: 1

      yes, Quake3 and others work but not CS !
      That is the point.

    3. Re:Im using WinXP beta, cant wait to buy it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I know, none of the video drivers that XP supplies have OpenGL support. Guess they want you to stick with D3D, huh?

      Solution: Download the drivers from the card or chipset manufacturer.

  25. Oh god... by BIGJIMSLATE · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    ...this is newsworthy? First (yet another) Monty Python lego story. Then stuff on PYRAMID KEYBOARDS (ie dumbest thing since bending over and ripping your anus wide open and posting it on a certain site). Now we have the "news" of the "First Windows XP system sold"? What's next? First AC who actually buys something from Think Geek? Osama bin Ladin says "George Bush has bad gas?" Cowboy Neal finally gets laid!?

    Sorry, but this was the dumbest thing I've read in a while. :p

    1. Re:Oh god... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "First AC who actually buys something from Think Geek?"

      Hey!

  26. Kinda a FYI by loraksus · · Score: 5, Informative

    MS has been giving out free copies of XP final, full retail, pro edition to pretty much every salesperson in computer stores across north america (i.e. the warez versions are the iso's of these discs). They had a fairly hot chick do the demonstration too, hell, I admit I'm shallow.
    MS also gave a crapload of stuff about why you should sell XP to your customers, etc, etc.

    And yeah, MS is at the very least bold in some of the things they do.
    How about this - before you log in, XP tells you whether you have passport mail waiting.
    Buy music = goto microsoft music, digital pictures -> MS.
    Allow tech support (or others) remote control of your PC? You have to be using messenger (or at least, that is what is built in) This ought to be fun when an exploit is discovered. Full system takeover is possible.
    Especially optimized for P4 (MS and intel, sitting in a tree, k.i.s.s.i.n.g ...)
    No fucking AOL (which, as a DSL tech support agent is music to my ears)
    Built in firewall (shitty one though)
    Built in ICS
    Built in passport games...
    No apparant way to remove messenger.
    The happy registration (which has already been cracked quite completely)

    Essentially what MS is doing is creating a computer software system (aka turnkey solution) in a box. Joe user won't have to buy anything else for his pc if he buys xp. I'm sure a lot of third party vendors are going to be pissed because they won't have a market for their products, but then again, geeks never bitched when MS included undelete w/MS Dos 5.

    On the upside,
    MS finally got rid of netbeui, so your network file transfers won't be slow as shit over the network.
    MS made the gui skinnable (almost exactly like windows blinds)
    hibernate ACTUALLY WORKS (third times a charm)
    it seems to actually be running stable (uptime 1 month, with my parents on it, which means _alot_, i.e. the system has not gone down since I installed it on an overclocked celeron box),
    added a change user function, which allows the system
    added the ability to "telnet" in and logon using the remote machines cpu power, ala X-Windows. Essentially terminal services on every machine.

    It looks fischer price, and I hate to say it, but MS might of have done what they promised to do when they release Windows 95. The price is insane though, $300US for full pro edition!!!!!

    Oh. If you work in a computer store and want a free (legal) copy, florida (24,25,26), texas (24, colorado(15),az(24), still have seminars going. Check
    http://www.microsoft.com/retail/live/
    though its kinda late. Proof of employment can be a tshirt w/ a name badge. See the evil for yourself.

    Well, gnight.

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    1. Re:Kinda a FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NetBEUI is still buried on the CD, It's actually much faster at copying files than NBT, so I figure your slow as shit comment refers to the broadcast traffic (which can also be a problem with your typically misconfigured MCSE network). Plus it allows me to copy dos games to my old PC. NETBEUI forever!

    2. Re:Kinda a FYI by dimator · · Score: 2

      Unbelievable how they have the audacity to bundle anything and everything, which is the same shinanigans that got them into hot water before. Scary thing is though, that everyone wants to give the ailing economy a little boost, and since XP might do just that (at least for computers) no one will complain.

      Should a company's connection to the economy make it legally untouchable?

      Should the Law's position change completely because a new administration is in place?

      If Big Money lobbyists make the decisions, the answer is "yes" to both.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    3. Re:Kinda a FYI by fifthchild · · Score: 1

      I got rid of Messenger (eventually... Deleted the damn thing) but apparently you can tell it not to install it when you setup.

      The other bitch is Outlook- you don't get to choose whether you want it or not and if you delete it Windows claims you have 'changed or removed essential system files' and asks you to put the CD in so it can replace them... Exqueeze
      me? Outlook? So far I have had none of the 'instability' it warned me about.

      But otherwise no shit with it yet (yet...). Hasn't offered anything Win 2K hasn't, though.

      Peace

      --
      Sham on
    4. Re:Kinda a FYI by reticent94 · · Score: 1

      MS made the gui skinnable (almost exactly like windows blinds)

      Without a third party skinning tool (like WindowBlinds) the only skins that are going to be available are going to be color variations of the included style. See http://www.stardock.com/ for a news blurb about how Stardock (the makers of WindowBlinds) are going to be launching WB 3 from Microsoft. XP's theme format may be cracked, but it has not happened yet and as .msstyles have to be digitally signed probably won't be happening.

    5. Re:Kinda a FYI by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      i thought it was more the fact that non os essential application couldn't be uninstalled (IE), and that they wouldn't allow vendors to ship with alternative software to what they provided (NS). all the big linux players bundle as much as possible into their distributions, some of the same functionality that MS is finally providing has been IN the linux kernel for a long time (firewall, ICS). i think one of the major differences is that with a linux system it's totally customizeable and ALL the interfaces are freely (beer) available.


      it does sound like the same old song and dance though. someone posted that messenger isn't able to be uninstalled


    6. Re:Kinda a FYI by Salsaman · · Score: 2
      Linux doesn't even come into the issue. The big difference is:


      a) none of the Linux companies have a monopoly. The law is different if you have a monopoly.


      b) You have the option of not installing or removing any of the stuff which is bundled with Linux distributions, and it will still work.


      c) You can also download Linux without any of the other apps which distributions bundle with it (and for free).

    7. Re:Kinda a FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      &gt hey had a fairly hot chick do the demonstration too

      Yes, I'm shallow too, Got any pics?

    8. Re:Kinda a FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can remove messenger by doing the following:

      Navigate to C:\windows\inf\ find msmsgs=msgrocm.dll,OcEntry,msmsgs.inf,hide,7
      Open sysoc.inf in the file and take out the word hide so the line would look like msmsgs=msgrocm.dll,OcEntry,msmsgs.inf,,7
      Close the file and save it.
      Now go to the Add and remove programs applet in the control panel and you will be able to
      uninstall windows messenger.

    9. Re:Kinda a FYI by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      i totally agree! my point was just that i thought it wasn't the bundling that got ms in trouble but the anti-competitive practices they used.

    10. Re:Kinda a FYI by CrayDrygu · · Score: 2
      hibernate ACTUALLY WORKS (third times a charm)

      That's funny, hibernate ACTUALLY WORKS on my Win2k box every night. I haven't actually shut it down in weeks (though I'm thinking of rebooting to get rid of a systray icon that won't go away...can probably just log off and back on, though). And it ACTUALLY WORKS just the same for the two other people I personally know who run 2k.

      So did you mean it actually works WITH YOUR HARDWARE, or am I missing something?

      --

      --
      "I personal[ly] think Unix is "superior" because on LSD it tastes like Blue." -- jbarnett

    11. Re:Kinda a FYI by ShoeHead · · Score: 2, Informative

      The skinning *is* a new form of windowblinds, it's quite easy to remove windows messenger, and the firewall is just that--a firewall.

      In addition Fast User Switching rocks, the desktop backgrounds are really cool, and it includes *built-in* support for burning CD's and watching DVD's. I didn't even have to install EasyCD. This means WMPlayer is very bloated, though, and has actually crashed numerous times on me. Weird enough, the OS never admits it is "Not Responding" and always makes me end other tasks first.

      You can install NetBeui if you want, and there is a QoS protocol (which I don't understand...) that lags you should you play Starcraft and/or Counterstrike. I disabled it. Network browsing seems to be really slow--it takes forever to find computers just in your workgroup, and longer to access their files.

      Remote Control is a good thing so you can fix your parents' computer in half to a quarter of the time it normally takes. The windows log in screen is tight, it has little squares for each user, which you click before logging in. It also tells you how much new email, and how many programs each user has. Every program is *not* run as root--there is a quite extensive set of permissions and groups settings that disallows stuff like that. I have my computer configured where guests (dorm mates) can long on with no password, and only store stuff in certain places and run certain programs.

      Furthermore, worms are less of a problem on the new Outlook as a) you can get software to scan email out and in (Norton), and b) Outlook is very *very* cautious now about attachments. My friend sent a stupid forward to me, with a .eml attached, and Outlook wouldn't even let me open it at first.

      Counterstrike is actually faster for me than it used to be (well, before 1.3 upgrade) This was the major part of my decision to delete my dual boot and keep the spare harddrive soley as backup. I have only found one program (suite) to be incompatible--the Lotus Smartsuite 97, which is very ugly and probably uses alot of hacks--finally broke. It won't run even in compatibility mode. I broke down and borrowed Word from my brother. Word 97 won't use my scroll mouse, but at least it can read the files.

      Hibernate stores a file (semi-permanently) on your HDD of the size of your RAM. It's very fast, and very cool, but does not constitute a reboot, so you won't get any medicinal uses out of it. The task manager is cooler than 2k, it has a few improvements to the graphs, and processes are listed by owner (Fast user switching is probably the reason why) Also, the computer does not freeze when you pull up the Task manager--something which at times I am grateful for and at times I hate with a passion.

      Search is disgracefully slow, partly because it includes all the cabs in the search, and there is a stupid animated dog that runs you through search the first time you run it (very stupid). Search via IE no longer has to use MSN, you can choose google, etc, though I still prefer the google toolbar.

      I probably won't buy Pro (unless I end up building a dual system) but I will *definitely* get the home.

    12. Re:Kinda a FYI by garett_spencley · · Score: 2

      The other thing that should be pointed out is that 90% (usually more though) of the software that's installed on a Linux system isn't the product of the company that's selling it.

      This is important because the MS issue is that they are forcing their product to be used instead of a competing one.

      --
      Garett

    13. Re:Kinda a FYI by Smallest · · Score: 1

      just for the record, it actually doesn't work with my brand new Dell system. (win2k pro)

      -c

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable proof which this margin is too small to contain.
    14. Re:Kinda a FYI by loraksus · · Score: 2

      The newer Compaq's, HP's, Dells fucking die (i.e. reboot in command mode, erase files to get windows up, etc, etc.) with hibernate.
      I've never had luck with the damn thing, until xp.
      As always, results may of have varied.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    15. Re:Kinda a FYI by laserjet · · Score: 1

      me too!

      [Moderators: This is a joke]

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    16. Re:Kinda a FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Navigate to C:\windows\inf\ find msmsgs=msgrocm.dll,OcEntry,msmsgs.inf,hide,7 Open sysoc.inf in the file and take out the word hide so the line would look like msmsgs=msgrocm.dll,OcEntry,msmsgs.inf,,7 Close the file and save it. Now go to the Add and remove programs applet in the control panel and you will be able to uninstall windows messenger.

      And they say Window is easy to use?

    17. Re:Kinda a FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's Napalm George W. Bush
      I've reported you to the secret service as a suspected terrorist. They told me that they will be making their weekly IP-log harvest from Commander Taco today anyway, so they'll be seein ya soon!

    18. Re:Kinda a FYI by sauronDLM · · Score: 1

      I think I remember reading about this on MS's support site. Sorta stumbled across while looking for something else. It seems that the reason power management doesnt usually work is because of a weird interaction between the FAT32 filesystem and the motherboard bios. I dont really remember any of the details. Maybe I will try to find the doc again.

    19. Re:Kinda a FYI by swright · · Score: 1

      arent all the permission and security stuff disabled on the home version? (to complicated for the average usr or some shite like that...)

  27. I think we all want to know.... by flewp · · Score: 1

    ... when is slashdot gonna order it's XP equipped machine to host slashdot.org?

    --
    WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
  28. First XP bug report entered 30 minutes later by migstradamus · · Score: 2, Funny

    XP system sold

    t-minus 19 minutes: First sold XP system booted.
    -19.5: First annoying XP nag message to open a Passport account
    -20: First XP "MSN Network" desktop icon deleted
    -25: First realization by first XP system buyer that most of his old system settings won't transfer.
    -26: First XP-inspired burst of profanity.
    -28: Attempt to use legacy scanner results in crash and second XP-inspired burst of profanity.
    -30: First XP-related bug report files.

    And so it begins!

  29. Try windows XP by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Now in Terriyaki flavor!

  30. Looks ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How did Microsff come up with those colors? Oh, they were inspired by the old windows 3.11 vga high contrast theme, nevermind.

  31. Other thing of concern... by aralin · · Score: 2

    With XP out you won't get Win98 even by accident now. Even now it was hard to get as OEM Win98. But now? And no, ME.2k or XP are NOT good enough since they don't run even some of the M$'s own games, not even talking about the other ISV. I was trying to get a decent notebook with W98 preinstalled, no chance whatsoever.

    --
    If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    1. Re:Other thing of concern... by rtaylor · · Score: 2

      You didn't look very hard for the laptop.

      www.ibm.com. Half their stuff is win98, the other half is win2k.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    2. Re:Other thing of concern... by Teferi · · Score: 2

      IBM laptops tend to have terrible graphics cards, among other issues.

      --
      -- Veni, vidi, dormivi
  32. hardware market saturated by underpaidISPtech · · Score: 1

    I dunno about XP. Fast, stable and *really* easy to use. Most lusers would love it. They probably won't see it though. They have their computers and really, how many people need a 1.4Ghz box to read their email? There is no killer app requiring a new machine that everyone wants to get access to, not like getting on the 'Net was in 95. I'm sure XP is bloated and all, when I installed an early build , I think it ate up just under a gig of space for the install, not much more than a current install of W2K. I think that most of the buyers will be the stragglers that don't own a PC yet, or those who are stil on 133-266 wintels. feh. Just another OS release, for now. Too bad the market isn't better, or we could all ride another surge in PC home buying and corporate sales.

  33. Then a sad day it is.. by letoram · · Score: 1

    First XP system sold, for me a frightening reality. Even though warezpuppies and beta-testing windowspuppets been running this for a while, it means another mark in the big-book of Windows users.

    Another number in the usage statistics, the same statistics that will serve as a motivator (read excuse) for a company to develop their applications XP style, because are a potential customer. Even if you are a warezpuppy, installing your 3r337 Windows.XP.Final.Beta.Beta.WankerGroup.Repacked you are helping Microsoft. Yes, by installing and running XP you add to these depressing statistics. Then again you're not the ones I feel sorry for.

    The one I wouldn't want to be right now is the customer receiving this computer. The same customer that a certain time later will be paying for his service packs, and monthly.

    But he will have the latest .net snapshot (cvs -co WinXP excluding the sources), the finest backdoored encryption systems and propably his personal integrity & privacy permanenty mv:ed to /dev/null.

    And then even if THEY get caught for killing John Doe's and several others' integrity, they will say: we are so sorry, please forgive us. It won't happen again. DOJ will belive them.

  34. Re:1st XP post by Thaidog · · Score: 0

    Have you ever tasted Foldger Crystals? I doubt I can... but I'll give a good try... for you...

    --

    ||| I still can't believe Parkay's not butter.

  35. Great post! by invi · · Score: 1
    New Zealand was the first country to release the system because of our position on the international date line.

    Which means no Windows XP in Nukualofa? They are at GMT+13:00 while New Zealand is just GMT+12:00.

    What an interesting post. Stuff that matters.

    1. Re:Great post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do they have electricity?

      do they have an M$ headquaters?

      prolly not...

  36. Virii and the twins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Just saw this on CNN, and thought I had to share:

    Within one hour of the terrorist attacks, the Customs Service placed all of its personnel and facilities on Level 1 "Code Red" alert.

    And for the record: if you see any slowdown in your network connectivity, this is not due to code red, nor to nimda, but probably just due to a certain Verizon switching center in lower Manhatten that has been badly damaged for some reason...

  37. wow by mdray · · Score: 1

    what did you fucking expect? for them to write it but not sell it?

  38. Don't trust a Kiwi.! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First the the Australian social security network, then Ansett, now the internet..

    But it was good to see Helen Clark fly out of East Sale RAAF base in an Orion..
    What a nice trip home that would have been.
    Don't trust a Kiwi they will stab you in the back every time.

  39. This does matter by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
    This does matter- because now, Microsoft will never reach any sort of settlement or back off the slightest amount. To them, now that XP has started to ship and sell, they will try to _expand_ their behavior, at the same time as the new judge is trying to get a handle on them and a sense of what they are.

    This is a recipe for total hubris on Microsoft's part, and a nasty defeat for them. I suspect it's better that they don't compromise or parley, because they lie anyway so why should we want them to be striking bargains? Let them be slapped down in full hubris. They can't be cured or moderated or reasoned with. I'm sure this judge has seen completely recidivist cases before.

  40. Barnum once said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a sucker born every minute.

  41. xp by jlemmerer · · Score: 1

    in europe xp will be presented in the first weeks of october as far as i know, but if you order a pc online you receive on with xp preinstalled (optional) how's that possible?

    --
    ".Sig Stealer" was here
    1. Re:XP by snubber1 · · Score: 1

      You know if MSFT allowed one to modify the interval on the time server update, people would think its cool to update every thirty seconds. The majority of users are *still* more braindead that MS.

      --
      I don't really mind double posts on //..
  42. So What... by bdumm · · Score: 0

    I thought this was stuff that matters. :)

  43. New worms coming in the next years ... by clarkie.mg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It will be fun to see how the worm-writing people will use XP. It could be the decline of m$ in the business market.

    Interesting also to see how the ISPs will react to DOS attacks.

    "Windows XP runs EVERYTHING at root, which means every program (and even the trojans hidden within that program) has full access to all Windows services, including more advanced network services than ever before. Where Windows ME is generally limited to UDP- and ICMP-flooding, for example, Windows XP can jump straight to the main event -- http flooding aat port 80. "Cringely

    "If Windows ME is a gun, Windows XP is a loaded gun.", Cringely

    --
    Men are born ignorant, not stupid; they are made stupid by education. Bertrand Russel
    1. Re:New worms coming in the next years ... by purplemonkeydan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Windows XP runs EVERYTHING at root, which means every program (and even the trojans hidden within that program) has full access to all Windows services

      Pigs arse everything runs as root. When you create a new user, it asks you whether the user is a admin or regular user. Regular users are NOT root.

      And for more control, you can fire up the Users and Groups MMC, and put users in appropriate groups, and set appropriate permissions.

      Who the hell is this Cringely dolt?

    2. Re:New worms coming in the next years ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a way for a user to do "su" in XP, or do you have to log out/in to admin stuff?

    3. Re:New worms coming in the next years ... by Johnno74 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, you can start a process as another user, but still in your regular session (like NT and 2k) or, new to XP, you can start another session as a different user, on a different desktop while the 1st user is still logged on (with programs running and all)

      This, and the cleartype support are about the only things I think XP has got going for it. I'm gonna stick with 2k unless MS releases a method of un-installing all the crap that is built in - Firewall, messenger, moviemaker etc etc etc.

    4. Re:New worms coming in the next years ... by generic-man · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna stick with 2k unless MS releases a method of un-installing all the crap that is built in - Firewall, messenger, moviemaker etc etc etc.

      Start > Control Panel > Add/Remove Programs > Add/Remove Windows Components.

      Hell, there's even an option in there to remove IE. Doing so saves you 0.0 MB of disk space (presumably it just removes the icons).

      --
      For more information, click here.
    5. Re:New worms coming in the next years ... by Quarters · · Score: 2

      You forgot to quote the very next paragraph from Cringley's article.

      I am far from the first person to write about this problem. You can find it explained in excruciating detail by my old friend Steve Gibson of Gibson Research. That link, as always, is behind the "I like it" button on the bottom of this page.

      Gibson has already been called to the carpet numerous times over this.

    6. Re:New worms coming in the next years ... by _xeno_ · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The users created when XP installed are automatically "root." And no, at install time, you are not given the option of making them "regular" users.

      (Specifically, it lists five text fields into which usernames are entered - these users do not get passwords unless you change the way in which login is handled. This is for the Windows XP Professional install, and not Home Edition - Home Edition probably does the same thing, though. I haven't really found there to be a big difference between Home Edition and Professional. (Although admittably this was RC2, but feature changes were not slated at that point, so it probably holds true with the release builds.))

      Which probably means that unless the OEMs take action to make sure Joe Consumer's XP box doesn't create Administrator (root) accounts when they first start up their new PC, the average consumer will be running every program as root.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    7. Re:New worms coming in the next years ... by purplemonkeydan · · Score: 2

      Yep, hit Windows + L, and you can log in as another user without killing the other session.

      Or, if it's a program that you need to run as admin a lot, you can create a shortcut that will run the program as another user.

    8. Re:New worms coming in the next years ... by purplemonkeydan · · Score: 2

      Kills the icons, and IEXPLORE.EXE, which is about 90k. Still keeps the COM objects and the DLL's around, though, as the shell needs them.

    9. Re:New worms coming in the next years ... by purplemonkeydan · · Score: 2

      Hmm ... I skipped that part when I installed, so I'll take your word for it.

      However, I don't think that's an overly big problem. If there are kids in the house, they will likely want to change their icon that appears on the login screen, and the Start panel.

      To do this, you have to go to the Users control panel, where the user type selector is pretty easy to get to from there.

      Obviously, not everyone is going to see this, but the smarter Joe Consumer's (not typical computer user, but consumers with a slightly above average intelligence, which isn't saying much :P) should pick it up, as it's on the screen after changing the icon.

    10. Re:New worms coming in the next years ... by unitron · · Score: 2
      "Gibson has already been called to the carpet numerous times over this."

      The phrase is "called on the carpet".

      A lot of people have disagreed with Gibson on this, but I haven't seen anything to indicate that they are particularly smarter or more knowledgeable in the area than he is.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    11. Re:New worms coming in the next years ... by big_groo · · Score: 1

      Hold down "shift" then right click what you want to run. It will pop up a menu (like any right clicking) and you select "Run As".

      *Almost* like 'su'.

      g

    12. Re:New worms coming in the next years ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In XP, right click on the program you want to run as root, click "Run As..", then enter the root username and password.

    13. Re:New worms coming in the next years ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please gibson is the biggest crackpot. Noone but leet d00dz and MCSEs take that silly pecker seriously.

    14. Re:New worms coming in the next years ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are correct, what OEMs do is very important. My guess is that a system sold by Dell, for example, will have a user created by default that has root access to the machine. The average user doesn't want to su to install services, drivers, etc that require superuser access. Therefore, most people that purchase a system from an OEM will be running their machines as root. Even I don't run a windows NT/2000 system as a regular user because the windows infrastucture is so broken that doing anything that requires privledges is a major PITA (save work, close all programs, log off, log back on, do what you need to do, log off again, log back on as yourself, start your programs again). There is a su utility for NT, but it is not sufficient (imho).

      But still, you don't need to have root access to do serious damage to a network. Even as a regular user, viruses such as nimbda would be just as bad.

  44. fist system by lposeidon · · Score: 0

    so what if its the first system... when's the last.

    --
    Lizard "Never let them set limits on your mind!"
  45. What happened to freedom? by epsalon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Three words: DMCA, UTICA, SSSCA!
    Next step: Cancellation of the first amendment
    Next next step: Death penalty for copyright violations.

    1. Re:What happened to freedom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next step: Personality Adjustment for Thought Crime

  46. XP by roguerez · · Score: 2

    XP rocks!

    It's the best Windows up to now, strenthening on point where Windows was not that good (remote access improved with Terminal Services, stability in 9x/ME series improved with NT-based kernel, etc) and where it was pretty good (a bit less memory use and a bit faster than W2K when using the Classic interface, ClearType fonts rock on my Sony picturebook).

    Some minor stuff I don't like that much: Internet time synchronizing can only be switched on or off, and a server can be defined. You can not, however, define the interval with which it updates. This is hardcoded at once every week, braindead of course..

    Still wouldn't use it for 'standard' services like HTTP, SMTP, POP3, etc etc etc, my FreeBSD station handles that much too well. That said, for a desktop operating system, presenting Internet Explorer, Office, Visio, WinAMP, Explorer and X-Win32 for remote UNIX access, it's a very good solution for my purposes.

  47. Cool, by t0qer · · Score: 1

    Sung to glory glory haulleluea

    MS marches on windows banner waving in the air.
    Stomping over penguins allmost everywhere.
    It's enough to give a slashdotter a good scare.
    XP's source code cannot be found anywhere.

    Bill Gates is Deploying again.

    Glory glory here comes the upgrades
    Glory glory here comes the user training
    Glory Glory we gotta upgrade all the pc's
    Cause the boss read XP will save him money! (which is BS)

    1. Re:Cool, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, the song's "Battle hymn of the Republic"
      Second, it's easier to sing when you don't have 319 syllables per line. Good parodies actually sound like a song, not a bunch of long un-rhymed sentences.

  48. why xp? by motherhead · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What exactly is an "on topic" post to this story?

    "It shipped?? On computers?? Were they in Boxes?? Did anyone get a good look at the Hologram??"...

    So instead I am going to ask some humble questions since I really haven't been following the XP thing as closely as perhaps I should have. But since I do run a couple of Windows boxes, I'm curious..

    Does it run games better then Win2K? About eight months ago I got lazy and stopped booting into 98 to play games. I found that on adequate system (gobs of inexpensive ram, thank you crucial) 2k runs games quite well. So yeah, my windows boxes are my game boxes.

    Suppose I had acquired a copy, should I be versed in this XP crack (that I.. Uh... Heard some hoodlum teens talking about behind the 7-11) before I install it? Or does the crack apply to subsequent installations.

    Is this thing as compromised in an Orwellian manor as I have heard? BS or fact, how much polling of my box does Microsoft get away with? Suppose I whip ZoneAlarm on it and I block access to M$? Does this pretty much break the system?

    Other then increased speed and stability (bug fixes) is there any compelling reason for someone running a workstation/game machine to even look at this fetid piece of shit?

    And seriously... Does Microsoft really think they are going to get away with this shit? Isn't this really all about the first stage in deploying digital encryption/copyrighting on a global scale? Are they not in on the MPAA mafia's brilliant scheme to block recordable media from storing copyrighted material and also trying to "urge" and "gently nudge" the sheeple from actually enjoying said material? (media player not ripping at 128 and so on... Like anyone rips with media player...) for the life of me I have yet to find a reason as to what exactly am I missing by not letting this thing into my house...

    Since OS 10.1 is supposed to be out on Tuesday (Seybold) and since I haven't slept in 32 hours and will probably spend Tuesday migrating my proper workstations to it (woo woo low level driver support, finally get my wacom tablets to run on it) I will probably sleep through all the wealth of XP juju bandied about on Monday in a beloved coma. So if anyone has any wisdom on any of this I would certainly appreciate it.

    1. Re:why xp? by umeshunni · · Score: 2, Informative

      For the record...
      winxp DOES run games a lot faster than win2k. i get 55fps in Q3 (640x480) while i get close to 70 on winxp - using the latest nvidia drivers of course (winxp does crib while u install the drivers - something abt them not being tested by whql - but u can ignore that).

    2. Re:why xp? by Glytch · · Score: 2

      I have a question for the gamers: Once you get past a reliable 30 fps for a game, does it really matter? Can the human eye really tell the difference between 55 fps and 70 fps, or is this all just phallic bragging?

    3. Re:why xp? by swright · · Score: 1

      There are a number of thigns about this...

      1 - if the frame rate is higher than the monitors refresh rate it doesnt make a blind bit of difference no matter what anyone says...

      2 - the quoted frame rates are *average* rates. its always gonna be lower when there's lots happening. And if those busy times make u drop to 15fps then you're gonna feel it...

      So yes, more frames are important - but its not as simple as the number quoted (as with everything in life eh ;)

  49. Give me a reason ... by evil9000 · · Score: 1

    From what i read here, this article is a non-event.

    Friends of mine who have beta tested xp have told me to get it for the eye-candy. Then in the next sentence to disable themes and most other features. In addition to this, i read a news article just last week basically said that microsoft congradulated and recommends purchasing stardock's theme manager, window blinds in addition to using winxp. Contradiction?

    Are there any real reasons to spend $200+US for a product that is just a fancy shell ontop of old Win2k code-base? Will microsoft post-pone the release of SP3 for win2k to force people to u/g to winxp in order to get the bug fixes that we really shouldnt need to pay money for?

    Why cant i get a licence to print money, but they can ??

  50. Misreporting by D+Anderson+n'Swaart · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I caught the briefs for this article on Three News, much to my bemusement. Apart from wondering why Microsoft chose New Zealand to debut XP, of all places, I couldn't help holding my head and screaming (and getting rolled eyes and exasperated sighs from the rest of my family :P) when poor John Campbell, not knowing any better, announced, "New Zealand today became the first place in the world for Microsoft's long awaited Windows XP program to go on sale..." and went on to say that it was a radical new program, with a number of advances over the previous Microsoft programs, Windows 95 and 98. Don't believe me? Check the website; it's all there at the bottom, although I imagine it won't be for long as the headlines are updated.

    In addition to this, "at one minute after midnight it was All Black Doug Howlett who became the first customer." Nice to know our "national heros" (bleh, rugby, I could care less that most New Zealanders worship these people) are so technically savvy...

    It occurs to me to wonder if, perhaps, Microsoft cleverly decided to do a test run of WinXP in New Zealand, so that if it bombed no one would notice. I mean, I doubt the average non-New Zealander/Australian even knows where New Zealand is...let alone that it's actually separate from Australia ;)

    1. Re:Misreporting by umeshunni · · Score: 1

      It was shipped in NZ first because the ship date was sept 24 and nz is the first major landmass which has an MS subsidiary and the earliest place where the day breaks!

      Someone mod the parent down !

    2. Re:Misreporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Television stations in NZ have a practice of covertly putting paid-for segments into their programs.

      Guess for yourself.

  51. I tend to agree by BenHmm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It pains me say this, but you're right. I've been using XP betas for the past few months, and it does, as you say, rock.

    Sure, I wouldn't use it for serving anything, and I rely on my linux machines for perl and the like, but for a desktop system, with an x-term and ssh, XP is the business. I'm on about a week uptime right now, and that's only because I added a second graphics card (dual monitor support is also v.v.g by the way) and it is as solid as any linux gui desktop. perhaps more so. It's full of very neat things, that only appear after you use it for a bit, that you soon learn to love.

    Annoying, but true.

    I may now have to go and wash my mouth out.

  52. Wait.. New Zealand isn't australia? by tpicot · · Score: 0

    Lol, nah, im a NZer, so, I will tell you now. The XP debut was a simply huge event. There were parades I tell you. Thats right. Dying children traveled from the corners of the globe to see the ticker-tape parade. Stuff the WTC, this is just huge.

    *not*.

    If I hadn't had read it on slashdot, I wouldn't have even known that the first pc had been sold with it. And I'm sure Doug Howlett was one of the many queing at the door, checkbook pre-signed, to buy the latest in technical computing agreement.

    And for those that don't know, The PC Company is world-famous in NZ (like l&p), for selling the cheepest computersin price, with the cheapest components.

  53. Forking stuff by MongooseCN · · Score: 2

    Remember when MS was talking about linux forking? According to the article Windows XP already comes in 3 different versions.

    On another note, I wonder if all 3 are really the same and all you have to do is change one line in the setup file to access the different files in the different versions. Like back with Win95, where you could select what version to install with the oemsetup.something file.

    1. Re:Forking stuff by archen · · Score: 1

      hasn't NT always come in different versions?

    2. Re:Forking stuff by NMerriam · · Score: 2

      They're probablya all the same, so no forking.

      I remember a few years back when it came out (after years of denial by MS of course) that NT server and workstation were the EXACT same except for one file (registry setting?), something very trivial like that.

      It's cheaper to develop that way -- like all floppy disks manufactured are double-sided, they just sell some for less labelled "single-sided" and leave out the hole...

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    3. Re:Forking stuff by ellem · · Score: 2

      Not exactly correct. Lots diff't under the hood. but the MOSt noticable difference was that WS would only support 10 connections, server could do more.

      --
      This .sig is fake but accurate.
    4. Re:Forking stuff by WNight · · Score: 2

      Actually, the parent post was right. Win NT Workstation and Server were identical. All system files were exactly the same. The difference between them was two registry settings, which you couldn't change while the OS was running.

      These settings created "hundreds of differences" to the running OS, but these were all run-time settings.

      For example, as you pointed out, Workstation was deliberately crippled so that it couldn't handle more then ten simultaneous connections. Workstation was more than capable of it (as much as an Win NT) but it wasn't allowed to.

      Later they started making these changes via #define statements in the code. It was essentially the same thing, but they could point to different executables to show that they weren't the same.

      That's when MS lost any chance of ever selling to the really big businesses. Nobody wants to buy software which you aren't allowed to use. WinNT Workstation is exactly that. The main difference between it and Server is the license "agreement".

      When you buy a OS (and computer) from other companies, they let you do anything you want with it. Want to run one user, or one thousand? Fine. (They might require a client-license for whatever you're running for each terminal, but the OS itself is capable of doing it.)

      (WinNT Server shipped with more utils, but all extras, that you didn't really need to run the system.)

    5. Re:Forking stuff by alastairm · · Score: 1

      Yep you could change WS to Server (not sure why you would want to though) see http://www.lehigh.edu/~rjm2/ntwntw.html for a method.

  54. Windows XP by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 1

    Ive got it installed here, but ill be sticking to Windows 2000 Advanced Server for a while yet.

    Nice UI in XP, built in zip compression (a direct hit at WinZip and clones)
    More services to disable :)
    More soothing login logout wav :D

    I expect more people to download DesktopX, WindowsFX and WindowBlinds (which is what MS licensed for the themes and skinning in XP)

    I think too many things in XP are under the hood (not that thats a bad thing) and most people upgrading from 2000 wont see alot (on the desktop side), under the hood things like perf optimisations and bug fixes. It will only bite users when MS stop Service packs for 2000 forcing them to upgrade.

    If you are comming from 9x codebase, sure it will be an experience, but from 2000, I dont think its enought to make me upgrade.

    Just my personal experience with XP so far:D

    --
    ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
    1. Re:Windows XP by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 1

      Speaking of Service packs, I think they should be more frequent. Rather than waiting a longer time and putting many fixes into them I would rather have them more often (less included in them but easier to deploy and verify)

      --
      ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
    2. Re:Windows XP by reticent94 · · Score: 1

      Nice UI in XP, built in zip compression (a direct hit at WinZip and clones)

      Nice once you change if from that hideous blue to the much better silver .

      One of the first things I installed was WinZip. Though for most people the built in util is probably good enough. I use WinZip's various context menu entries for just about everything. I suggest to anyone who hasn't already to grab the latest beta of WinZip.

      WindowBlinds (which is what MS licensed for the themes and skinning in XP)

      MS did not license WB for the skinning in XP. They developed there own engine which functions very similar to WB.

    3. Re:Windows XP by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 1

      Oh ok, I was told they licensed it.

      THanks for clearing that up.

      I guess they just updated the old 9x themes and made it a service

      --
      ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
    4. Re:Windows XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first service pack for XP will come when windows.NET server RTM's in Q1 of 2002. The service pack will unify the codebases for all the XP OSes and the windows.NET versions.

  55. uh huh. by donabal · · Score: 1

    And I should care... because?

    Windows sells when it comes out. Like it or not, its the truth.

    Now... if the story went "First Windows XP Systems Donated To Third World Countries" I would be impressed.

    --donabal

    --
    Safety First Day?
    1. Re:uh huh. by |DeN|niS · · Score: 1
      Now... if the story went "First Windows XP Systems Donated To Third World Countries" I would be impressed.

      Reminds me of the Red Cross appeal for Windows/Citrix licenses after the WTC tragedy. I just hope MS donated those, it would be outrageous for them to expect the Red Cross to BUY them in situations like those.

      Also nice thing to consider, when you donate to the Red Cross to help the victims the money goes to Microsoft! Can't go down too well I imagine.

    2. Re:uh huh. by unitron · · Score: 2

      How about if we get them to donate to third world terrorists? I can't think of a better way to disorganize and demoralize them. ObL would have to spend his entire fortune staffing a help desk.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  56. Re:A new danger by ergo98 · · Score: 1

    Would it make more sense if you said that the skeletons et. all will emerge on the last day of October?

  57. NetBEUI by The+Paradox · · Score: 1

    MS finally got rid of netbeui, so your network file transfers won't be slow as shit over the network.

    Just thought I'd make a point here. NetBEUI gets a bad rap, but it's actually one of the faster network protocols because of its small size...both in theory and practice.

    I used it on my own network for several months, then switched to TCP/IP because of other problems, mainly that the protocol *is* shit. No support for hibernation, extremely limited capabilities, and bugs enough to be an entomologist's dream.

    But it was still fast. ::grin::

    --
    Pain(n): when you're telnetting into a box doing somethin cool, and some luser calls for help with a 'critical error' ad
    1. Re:NetBEUI by mosch · · Score: 2

      netbeui gets a bad rap because it's fucking useless 99% of the time. in this day and age, very few people have a use for an unrouteable protocol, even if they do save a few bytes on every packet.

    2. Re:NetBEUI by The+Paradox · · Score: 1

      netbeui gets a bad rap because it's fucking useless 99% of the time. in this day and age, very few people have a use for an unrouteable protocol, even if they do save a few bytes on every packet.

      Whaddabout small peer-to-peer networks that don't need routing? I switched to TCP/IP when I added a dsl router to the network (ICS sucks in a major way).

      Up until then, sure, I had some problems, but it worked. For quite a few home users, NetBEUI isn't a bad solution.

      --
      Pain(n): when you're telnetting into a box doing somethin cool, and some luser calls for help with a 'critical error' ad
    3. Re:NetBEUI by mosch · · Score: 2

      Yeah, there are tons of users who setup networks in their house, but don't bother with an internet connection. Right.

    4. Re:NetBEUI by The+Paradox · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there are tons of users who setup networks in their house, but don't bother with an internet connection. Right.

      ICS or any other form of sharing 56k sucks and isn't worth it, but transferring files over a network is a lot more fun than transferring files via sneakernet. Yeah, I think there's some out there. I was one. ;)

      --
      Pain(n): when you're telnetting into a box doing somethin cool, and some luser calls for help with a 'critical error' ad
    5. Re:NetBEUI by ScoLgo · · Score: 1

      I use netBEUI to isolate our NT data servers. Even if a hacker were to get through our firewalled NT DSL router, they'll only see the workstations that have access to the net. Our critical data should be safe since it's only accessible via a non TCP protocol.

      Of course, we're fine with a very small, non-routed network. No plans to upgrade to XP. If it ain't broke, I ain't fixing it. Guess MS will have to wait to get my next $0.02.

      --
      "Michael, I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing - and it was everything that I thought it could be."
    6. Re:NetBEUI by Dahan · · Score: 1

      IPX is still supported, if you wanna share files but don't want to bother with configuring TCP/IP.

  58. And why is this here?... by mblase · · Score: 2

    Are Slashdotters really so astonished that Windows XP would sell *at all* that this needed posting?

  59. Millennium vs XP...better or sucky? by The+Paradox · · Score: 2, Funny

    XP also happens to boot very fast.. in fact, it's faster than coming out of hibernation here, and certainly comparible to an equivilent Unix system.

    My Millennium system boots in about a minute, with a bunch of slow-loaders like Norton and the Office Shortcut Bar, and LILO just past the BIOS level. How fast are you talking?

    It performs at least as well as 2k, with tweaks in most of the right places, hence making it Quite Good[tm]. And it runs vim, UT, Q3 and CS - what more could you ask for? :)

    ::pretends to think:: Oh...I could ask to be able to USE my computer freely, heh, since I've paid for it. ;)

    I've always been a faithful part of the MS fold before. But all this crap I read about with not being able to copy ripped MP3's to other computers, and problems intercepting audio streams at the hardware levels...sheesh.

    I'll reserve my judgement until I actually get my hands on a copy and try it out. After all, I got most of my information on that topic from the print media, and you *know* how reliable they are.

    However, I will say that if it's relatively crash-free, I may indeed upgrade. After six months of dealing with Millennium, I'm ready for a change...

    (Myself) "Yeah, I want you to transfer a file, like."
    (Millennium) "Ohh man, I'm not sure I can do this. This looks hard."
    (Myself) "No, it's not that hard, it's a twenty-kb Word document."
    (Millennium) "You're scaring me! MEESTER GATESSSS! HELP!" ::blue screen of death appears::
    (Myself) ::resists temptation to hit a perfectly good laptop with a hammer::

    And that's not even starting in on the fact I had to format and reinstall the day after I got my computer cos it loaded wrong at the factory...

    But this is turning into a Millennium diatribe. Suffice it to say that the next OS is either something more stable from MS, or *nix. And I even loaded RH 7.0 in frustration one day after a particularly high number of BSODs. ;)

    --
    Pain(n): when you're telnetting into a box doing somethin cool, and some luser calls for help with a 'critical error' ad
    1. Re:Millennium vs XP...better or sucky? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I Hibrnate, I can boot in 10 seconds, up and working in 10 bloody seconds!!! That is on a Dell Inspiron 7500 with 128 mb. Impressed I was. Normal boot time is 30 seconds.

      I dont bother ripping mp3 anymore - I go WMA and turn off copy protection. works like a charm. Flies are a touch large, but playback is superb. Also can burn direct to CD-R if you have one. That is very nice.

      I concur that XP is highly tunable. There are all sorts of places you can go to tune, memory for one you can set for apps to stop paging, or stop the OS from going into paging. Setting display options for maximum performance really gets things hustling and of course registry hacks galore. Dare I say it, if you close your eyes and forget it's Microsoft, it's a hackers dream with what you can do. it's remarkably open.

      It runs considerably faster than W2K on this laptop, faster than anything including Linux. It has never crashed, nor even looked like crashing. Display drivers are sweet as.

      I recommend taking WinMe and throwing it out. Go XP and do it now. You will need 128mb for good performance and at least a PII400.

      There are two reasons to want to use Linux on the desktop. 1, no product activation ( whinch aint that bad) and 2, cost. There are no other reasons. XP toasts Linux or anything else ofr use, speed, stability and just general fun. Considering all the cool tools it has and a very decent command line, Linux has a huge amount of ground now to catch up. Sorry, but that's the truth.

      If XP didnt have product activation, it would run riot over the install base. It's a compelling reason to upgrade and for once, it is a genuine upgrade.

      As a sys admin, I have seen the supprt time needed drop dramatically since the introduction of W2k - it's possible I'll set up machines and never need to see them again.

      If XP was a Linux distro, you would all be drooling over it. Take the MS blinkers off and see for yourself. If Product activation isnt much of a problem, you can kiss the in roads Linux has made goodbye. It's that damn good.

    2. Re:Millennium vs XP...better or sucky? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, as to the mp3-sitation you describe, as long as you use 3rd-party tools like EAC and LAME, everything should work as it always does (ie, flawlessly.)

    3. Re:Millennium vs XP...better or sucky? by SomePoorSchmuck · · Score: 1

      It runs considerably faster than W2K on this laptop, faster than anything including Linux. It has never crashed, nor even looked like crashing.

      This is like saying, in 1919, that Stalin has never ordered, nor even looked like ordering, the deaths of millions. "Just you wait, 'enry 'iggins!"

      Funniest [un]intentionally ironic shill I've read all day!!

      --

      Hollywood, Television, has become the dream machine. We need to take that back; each of us is a Dream Machine
    4. Re:Millennium vs XP...better or sucky? by FFFish · · Score: 2

      "::pretends to think:: Oh...I could ask to be able to USE my computer freely, heh, since I've paid for it. ;)"

      No, no, no! You're using the old-style think, where you actually purchase the product.

      You've just gotta get yourself into the new-style think, where you are purchasing a license to use the product.

      Sort of like with leased cars, okay? You lease the car, and the car dealer then restricts where you can park the ca.... waittasec.

      Okay, then, sort of like with a rental Bobcat loader, okay? You rent the loader, and the rental company then restricts what you can loa... um. Hold on...

      I've got it! It's like hiring a carpet cleaning service, okay? You hire the guy to clean your carpets, and he decides which carpets he's gonna clea... oh.

      Hmmmm.

      This new-think software licensing thing is strange shit, eh?

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    5. Re:Millennium vs XP...better or sucky? by seann · · Score: 0

      I seriously think your dreaming.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    6. Re:Millennium vs XP...better or sucky? by Alan · · Score: 2

      I dont bother ripping mp3 anymore - I go WMA and turn off copy protection. works like a charm. Flies are a touch large, but playback is superb. Also can burn direct to CD-R if you have one. That is very nice.

      That's great, except that there are no WMA players for any other OS than windows (oh, ok, and the derivatives of windows, but I'm talking linux/unix/mac/etc here), and that the devices that I use in my day to day life (like my Kenwood MP3 CD playing car deck) don't support WMA, so WMA is completly fscking useless to me.

      I guess in a way it's like beta vs vhs (and forgive me if it seems that I'm saying WMA is better), where the more common and proliferant (sp?) format is the one that "wins", not the better or more marketed one.

      Actually, I guess previously the more/better marketed one (vhs vs beta, windows 95 vs os/2...) won in the end, but I think that WMA is working at a distinct disadvantage here. They are not as widespread, not as open, not as common, not as free, and not used in the wide range of devices (rio, empeg, phones, car decks, mp3-cd discmen) that mp3s are. There's not a lot of inspriation for the non-computer devices to change either. Not only do you have to pay the ms-tax, and deal with non-open standards, but there isn't a lot that MS can threaten a company like Kenwood with like they could to someone like Compaq (where they can say 'unless you do X for us we won't let you sell our products' or something).

      My $0.02

    7. Re:Millennium vs XP...better or sucky? by SilentChris · · Score: 2

      Windows Media Player for Mac OS plays WMA's. Just watch: other players will get the rights to as well.

    8. Re:Millennium vs XP...better or sucky? by Dwonis · · Score: 2

      Speaking of WMA (more specifically, its competitors), what's the Vorbis encoder like lately?

  60. Re:A new danger by unitron · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Would it make more sense..."

    No, not really. Idiots with slightly improved accuracy are still idiots.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  61. be sure to post the story on..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    first xp system RETURNED. :)

  62. In four months time... by Bazman · · Score: 2

    "World's Second XP System Sold".

  63. Re:A new danger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...eating the brains of the innocent...

    Hey - they might not be that kind of zombie.

  64. XP RULES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WE SHALL DOMINATE...ALL will sucumb to the glory of Microsoft. For it is written "One operating system Shall bind them all.

  65. whoop tee do ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oooh! First XP system. Big Fucking Deal.

  66. first windows xp system sold to linux user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now THAT'S newsworthy!

    seriously, all this bitching about xp is pointless. don't like it? don't use it. shut the hell up.

  67. what more? by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 2
    Personally, I would ask for an OS that I was allowed to install on more than 1 machine without having to pay 1/4 the cost of the hardware that it's going to run on. I would ask for an OS that I don't have to call up some company and get some key in order to install. I would ask for an OS that I can install on a new machine that I build myself without having to buy another license. I would ask for an OS that doesn't intentionally break old software and ODBC drivers that my company needs to operate. I would ask for an OS that I don't have to purchase from a company that has a reputation for doing audits that cost large companies millions of dollars and weeks of wasted time. I would ask for an OS where ALL the APIs are published so I am on even footing when writing competing software. I would ask for an OS that isn't developed by a company that uses licensing terms to try to silence criticism of said company. I would ask for an OS with development tools that are affordable for me to use for hobby programming. I would ask for an OS NOT made by a company that puts restrictions on what type of software/licensing terms are acceptable to develop with their software. I would ask for an OS that doesn't limit, by licensing terms, how many clients I am allowed to deal with at a time, etc.

    Personally, I would as for an OS that isn't Windows XP.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:what more? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I would ask for an OS that I don't have to call up some company and get some key in order to install.

      Don't bother calling them -- just try this key:

      FCKGW-RHQQ2-YXRKT-8TG6W-2B7Q8

      And if you're having trouble with your CD installation media, you might want to check FreeNet for a functional download rather than wasting your time trying to exchange it.

      PS The above is protected by the First Amendment. (That and 50c...)

  68. A reasonable question... by Masem · · Score: 2
    Did that OEM computer come with recovery disks or with an installable version of XP?

    True, since this sounds like a small shop in NZ, it's probably the full XP version, but what will happen when Dell or Gateway release their XP machines?

    The entire idea of the recovery disk which typically requires one to reformat their hard drives (and note that most OEM machines come with only one HD with one partition), is a really stupid idea in the first place; I'm sure it's great for OEM support since they know how they can get back to a completely fresh, working machine, but it sucks for even a semi-literate computer user. And if I remember correctly, MS pushed for some of that in recent years. I'm sure it's going to continue with XP.

    --
    "Pinky, you've left the lens cap of your mind on again." - P&TB
    "I can see my house from here!" - ST:
    1. Re:A reasonable question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The PC Company isn't exactly a "small shop", they're a nationwide chain that outsells IBM, Dell & Gateway in NZ.. only outsold by HP & Compaq..By far the largest NZ owned player in the market.

  69. I wouldn't want to be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the first idiot that bought Windoze XP!

  70. Windows XP and Standalone Machines by tilleyrw · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If you wish to have an XP machine that does not contact M$ home ba$e to register, simply use the following "God Mode" number.

    It activates all modes of your computer, disables all checking and lets you use XP as M$ never intended.

    MS Windows XP Professional -- Corporate Edition

    FCKGW-RHQQ2-YXRKT-8TG6W-2B7Q8

    --
    This post encoded with ROT26. If you can read it, you've violated the DMCA. Handcuffs please, sergeant.
    1. Re:Windows XP and Standalone Machines by PygmySurfer · · Score: 1

      If you wish to have an XP machine that does not contact M$ home ba$e to register, simply use the following "God Mode" number.

      It activates all modes of your computer, disables all checking and lets you use XP as M$ never intended.


      I believe in order for this to work, you would still need to obtain the volume license version, which is available through Microsoft's corporate licensing programs, which if course would come with its own key anyway.

    2. Re:Windows XP and Standalone Machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, I used that one on my copy of XP Professional I got about 2 weeks ago.

  71. i guess... by xtermz · · Score: 1

    Available in three versions, emphasis is being placed on Windows XP's entertainment components, including tools for organising and sharing digital

    XP's enhanced 'spell check' features aren't up to par yet...

    --


    I lost my concept of community when my community lost all concept of me.
    1. Re:i guess... by paranoid.android · · Score: 1

      You do realize that this article came from New Zealand, right?

    2. Re:i guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're British like me, ...ising is just as correct as ...izing for most words. I assume AU and NZ English is closer to British English than it is to American.

  72. What would you pay? by fygment · · Score: 1

    re " ...The price is insane though ..."

    Well, what would be a reasonable price? For that matter, since value is often tied to cost in our society (e.g. $0 = 0 value), what would you pay for your fav Linux distro?

    Me? I'd not pay more than $100 for any Win flavour without feeling cheated. And the $75 I spent on SUSE a few years ago has repaid itself sooo many times.

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
    1. Re:What would you pay? by loraksus · · Score: 2

      Reasonable for would be around $20. Who the hell would pirate a $20 OS? MS would end up better off doing that instead doing some registration. Come on, I know like 2 people who are honest and actually pay for windows. MS should wake up and realize wtf is going on in the outside world.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  73. XP faster then win 2k?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm if youd check your XP boot time youd notice MS has cheated a little by booting up the GUI before the majority of services start so in effect it aint faster coz you really cant do anything until the services start, its a trick i tells ya.

  74. I would buy XP tomorrow if... by mav[LAG] · · Score: 3, Insightful

    it could make time run backwards as you suggest :)

    --
    --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
  75. *Sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Raw sockets don't matter that much.

    Does it matter if you are being pinged to death by a thousand 9x machines which you could possible record the IP's and do absolutly nothing about or with these amazing raw sockets..*shock* they could fake where these drone machines are comming from.

    The point? Who cares. It makes little difference as either way these are drone machines and there is nothing you can do either way.

  76. if you're interested... by jbeamon · · Score: 1

    Anyone interested in trying out the telnet connection to the world's first OEM XP box can contact me for a username and password at l337H4X0R@no.com. First account goes to the highest bidder in a brief silent auction that will terminate at midnight CDT. Good luck, and happy hunting.
    --
    -j

    --
    -j
  77. M$ subsidiaries have some freedom by clarkie.mg · · Score: 1

    M$ subsidiaries (correct word ?) have some freedom, you know !
    Everything in the M$ world is not decided in one office in Redmond !

    And about New Zealand, if you don't know where it is, you should go back to school.

    --
    Men are born ignorant, not stupid; they are made stupid by education. Bertrand Russel
  78. And so it begins? by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From the article: And so, it begins.

    Don't you really mean: The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote.

    --

    Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
  79. Most still are. by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 1


    Cuz I ain't buyin another thing from Microsoft ever again, when it can't handle new computing, then I go Linux. I am not an open source purist, but I'll be damned if I'll buy another buggy OS, that takes up more space than its free neighbor. By the way, I think a lot of casual PC users think the same way. Linux will do better than expected in the future.

    1. Re:Most still are. by jiheison · · Score: 1

      Cuz I ain't buyin another thing from Microsoft ever again

      I completely agree. My Win98 box does everything that I need. It rarely even crashes anymore, since I have weeded out most of the problems. I figure that by the time software advances to the point that I need a new OS, Linux will be a viable alternative (and by viable, I simply mean for my uses. I am sure that it is already viable for many users).

    2. Re:Most still are. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I was originally going to degrade you fully for making such a ridiculous and flatly incorrect remark about casual users and Linux but, after seeing your nick, I realized that being a Chevy fan (not to mention the embarassing El Camino in particular) is a better insult than anything I can hurl.

      Nice self-flame. Kudos to you.

  80. NetBEUI *IS* useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > On the upside,
    > MS finally got rid of netbeui, so your network file transfers won't be slow as shit over the network.

    Actually, NetBEUI is *VERY* useful for home networking, especially with cablemodems and DSL becoming more and more common.

    NetBEUI is a non-routeable protocol, so that your home network (and it's shares!) won't be visible to the entire internet.

    If you have both TCP/IP and NetBEUI installed, with Microsoft File and Print Sharing bound to NetBEUI and *NOT* TCP/IP, your local drives and shares won't be seen ourside your local (dsl/cablemodem -> home router/firewall -> home networked machines) setup.

    Check out your "network neighborhood" on your cablemodem sometime. See what your neighbors have on their machines. And resist the temptation to rootkit them.

  81. Good for the economy by Sloppy · · Score: 2

    good for the economy: it requires you to upgrade your pc again to an Intel P4, which will in turn revive the economy and make Bill richer by the stocks that rise.

    (I know you're joking, but a lot of people actually think that way. So I'll rant...)

    Waste is not good for the economy. It is destructive.

    By the Wintel-is-good-for-the-economy logic, hurricanes, earthquakes, and the WTC disaster are also "good for the economy" because they create construction jobs. And the invention of "Mr. Fusion" would be bad for the economy.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  82. 17 Across. Freud was one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    --
    You are a Censor with 5 points.


    Hey, yours is one of the most clever, astute sigs I've seen on slash sites. Nicely done.

  83. The end of Linux hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As Win2000 is 4-6 years ahead of Linux in terms of technology (Kernel threading, Distributed Transaction Monitor, Reliable Message Queuing, Directory, etc. etc.) now this advantage also comes to the desktop of home users.

    Remember that Linus announced that 2.4 will be released on the same date as Win2000? Now we have XP and 2.4 is still doubted to be stable at all. And may it be stable, then it is not usable by mere mortals. Really a great proof how much better open source is :-()

  84. As I've Already Said, by dbCooper0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    On a different topic, God Help U.S.

    --
    db
    Cig:
    ôô
    /`
  85. Answer to your sig by SomePoorSchmuck · · Score: 1
    How many innocent civilians did the USA nuke in Hiroshima and Nagasaki now again .. ?

    According to the Encyclopedia of Genocide [ABC-Clio, 1999, ISBN 0874369282],

    "The number of persons in Hiroshima at the time of the bombing is thought to have been approximately 400,000, of which some 40,000 were military personnel. The bomb destroyed most of the city, and resulted in the immediate deaths of some 90,000 - 100,000 persons. Deaths and injuries were caused by blast, heat, fire and radiation. By the end of 1945, approximately 140,000 people are thought to have died as a result of the Hiroshima bombing."

    "It [the Nagasaki bomb] destroyed much of the city and killed some 35,000 - 40,000 people immediately. By the end of 1945, approximately 70,000 persons died as a result of the bombing."

    Which brings Your US Government Nuclear Murder Grand Total to almost a quarter of a million snuffed human lives.

    Also of note:

    "The decision to drop nuclear weapons on Japan was made by US President Harry Truman and his close advisors, despite their knowledge that Japan was attempting to negotiate terms of surrender. On learning of the bomb's 'success,' Truman commented, 'This is the greatest thing in history.'

    ...Since international humanitarian law was already in place at the end of World War II... it can be concluded that the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were illegal acts of war. They violated international humanitarian law by attacking civilian populations..."

    --

    Hollywood, Television, has become the dream machine. We need to take that back; each of us is a Dream Machine
  86. the PC Company + Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're a pro-MS crowd, that's why they got the honour.
    I went in there back in early 1998 to ask about buying a new computer, but guess what, they wouldn't sell me the version of Windows 95 without Internet Explorer 4.0 intergrated, and said it wasn't possible to sell computers without IE4.0 pre-installed because it came set in at the factory (what factory???).

    So I got a computer from the shop one block away, and I'm still using that copy of Windows 95 WITHOUT bloated, slow Internet Explorer slowing my computer down by 25%.

    1. Re:the PC Company + Microsoft by Homewrecker · · Score: 0

      So instead, you used -- what, Netscape? Yeah, you're a speed demon alright.

      --

      --- Linux R00lz!

  87. WRONG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for an ISP in a small town and we do dialup/dsl local to our county. About 2 weeks ago this lady who knew nothing about computers came in with a P4 1.4ghz machine claming she just bought it from one of the local computer stores and it had WinXP Beta2 installed on it. I hooked up the machine and sure enough it did. I explained to this lady all the legalities involved too. She took it back he yelled at her, hows that for customer support?

  88. Malaysia by zardor · · Score: 1

    Seems that there is a huge market for XP in Malaysia already, discounted at $1.50 a pop.

    --
    -- We don't understand software, and sometimes we don't understand hardware, but we can *see* the blinking lights
  89. 23 Down. "Heil" preceeder by SomePoorSchmuck · · Score: 1

    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    why did you map both 'f' and 'g' onto 't'? also, the apostrophe appears completely unmapped. why go to all the trouble of inputting a patterned sequence if you violate the pattern, reducing its clarity?

    ahh....

    --

    Hollywood, Television, has become the dream machine. We need to take that back; each of us is a Dream Machine
  90. 30 Minutes Later by Maul · · Score: 1

    The first Windows XP Blue Screen of Death!

    --

    "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

  91. Next verse by germinatoras · · Score: 1

    Microsoft:

    The conditions in the market have their plans in pits of tar,

    We have had enough of Upgrades, we are fine with where we are.

    If ONE is all they're selling, they will never get to far,

    Their bottom line is sunk!

  92. Begin the ... by benedict · · Score: 1

    It's "Begin the Beguine".

    A Beguine is apparently some sort of nun, but "Begin the Beguine" is an old tune by Cole Porter.

    --
    Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
  93. Re:In Other News Today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh heh, I don't know how they could have Modded you down; your comparison of WinXP to the Brooklyn Bridge seems fairly astute.

    Must be those paid M$ hacks who work Slashdot all day, hoping to corrupt the young and the free...

    Really, if M$ will astroturf the newsgroups, why not Slashdot? They got caught before...

  94. One more by germinatoras · · Score: 1

    Surreptuously they monitor the stuff on your PC
    If you add a CD-ROM drive, you will pay a licence fee.
    Surely you did not expect that things this good are free?
    Our licence marches on!
    Glory, glory, "Activation"!
    "Fair use" earns our defecation!
    Crackers get eternal damnation!
    Our licence marches on!

  95. Normal users don't have access to raw sockets by throx · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's some code for you to run:

    int main(int argc, char* argv[])
    {
    SOCKET s;

    WSADATA wsadata;
    WSAStartup(MAKEWORD(2,2), &wsadata);

    s = WSASocket(AF_INET, SOCK_RAW, IPPROTO_IP, NULL, 0, 0);
    printf("%d\n", s);

    SOCKADDR from;
    int fromlen = sizeof(from);

    struct sockaddr_in to;

    ZeroMemory(&from, sizeof(from));
    ZeroMemory(&to, sizeof(from));

    char buf[4096];

    to.sin_family = AF_INET;
    to.sin_addr.S_un.S_addr = 0x0100007F;
    to.sin_port = 0;

    int sb = sendto(s, buf, 0, 0, (SOCKADDR *)&to, sizeof(to));
    DWORD sbe = GetLastError();

    int cb = recvfrom(s, buf, sizeof(buf), 0, &from, &fromlen);
    DWORD cbe = GetLastError();

    printf("%d, %d\n", sb, cb);
    printf("%d, %d\n", sbe, cbe);
    closesocket(s);

    scanf("\n");
    }

    When you run as an admin, it works. When you run as a non-admin you get an error (EACCESS) trying to send or receive from the raw socket.

    To put it simply, GRC is lying to you for the purposes of selling his own products and you got suckered. The rules for raw sockets are exactly the same as on Win2k and Linux - you gotta be root.

    --

    Fear: When you see B8 00 4C CD 21 and know what it means

  96. Undelete? by eples · · Score: 1

    I'm sure a lot of third party vendors are going to be pissed because they won't have a market for their products, but then again, geeks never bitched when MS included undelete w/MS Dos 5.

    What? Deltree was neat too..

    --
    I'm a 2000 man.
  97. XP vs. W2K Feature Chart by eples · · Score: 1

    Check out this feature chart [microsoft.com] for a better idea of what XP has that 2K doesn't.

    Thanks for the link!
    Now I know for sure not to waste my money!

    I though /. was for Linux, anyway...

    --
    I'm a 2000 man.
    1. Re:XP vs. W2K Feature Chart by TeraCo · · Score: 1

      I though /. was for Linux, anyway... Hint, the title says news for nerds, not news for linux fanatics.

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
  98. Re:Slashdot 'em! Great Way To Stop XP Sales! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If that happens, MicroSoft will just lobby congress to make visiting websites illegal.

    And they'd probably win...

  99. What does WinMe give you that Win98 doesn't? by WD · · Score: 1

    More crashes perhaps? Having WinMe and Win98 on the same machine seems a bit ridiculous.

    1. Re:What does WinMe give you that Win98 doesn't? by Jethro · · Score: 2

      WinME boots faster. (;

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
  100. Absolutely, AND they violate the DMCA. by Lethyos · · Score: 2

    Web sites are further more a violation of the Digital Millenium Copyright Act since they allow intelligent people to exchange data that MIGHT lead towards the development of anticircumvention devices.

    --
    Why bother.
  101. In other news... by Wonko42 · · Score: 2
    In other news, Pharquar P. Parkenfarker of Los Angeles bought a newspaper today at approximately 9:03am Pacific Daylight Time. It is widely believed to have been his first newspaper purchase of the day.

    After purchasing the paper, Mr. Parkenfarker sat down on a bench for the very first time today and waited for a bus for the very first time. At approximately 9:13am, Mr. Parkenfarker boarded a bus for the very first time today, and at approximately 9:47am he arrived at his office for the first time today.

    Following this, at approximately 9:52am, Mr. Parkenfarker said "Good morning," to a coworker for the very first time today, and proceeded to drink today's very first cup of bitter, badly-made coffee from the office coffee pot (which he saw for the very first time today at approximately 9:55am).

    1. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever considered writing for the Onion?

  102. Re:In Other News Today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Oh cripes, you're talking about a Microsoft sheep attitude around this site? You, sir, are either the stupidest person ever to stumble out of a cave or are very new to Slashdot.

    These wankers would scramble to justify it if Linux were the cause of this whole WTC thing.

  103. XP, why not?, by kryptola · · Score: 0

    Well, I am still use Win2K and are ready to upgrade to XP. M$ software is cheap in my country (about $1.5 for my Win2k), so why not. but my default lilo is linux anyways. since 1970, unix still runs great. running windows just to see how far M$ is behind the TUX
    BD

    --
    "Trying is the first step towards failure" - Homer J Simpson.
  104. Turnkey solution... by ayeco · · Score: 1

    Turnkey Solution? Welcome to the Mac OS. When the mac-ites laugh at XP, remind them that imovie, imusic, ithis, ithat, and quicktime is the same as XP (as in turnkey).

    "'Little guys', you may now go home."

  105. Enough making fun of XP already! by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The significant differences between Linux and Windows XP are very few. They aren't worth arguing. You can say "Oh, but the Linux kernel is prettier!" but it doesn't matter when both OSes are rock solid. And the stability of a PC OS mostly comes down to drivers as it. Run Linux with a poor video driver and you'll have endless headaches. Ditto for Windows XP. You can say that Windows XP is bloated and slow, but you can say the same of Linux + XWindows + KDE/Gnome as well.

    So it all comes down to Windows XP being a Microsoft product and Linux being free, and that there is some software you can only get for one or the other. That's about all you can argue, though most people don't care.

    1. Re:Enough making fun of XP already! by ShishCoBob · · Score: 1

      That's the best way to put it.

      --
      http://www.maximum-cars.com - My little hobbie.
    2. Re:Enough making fun of XP already! by NeoMage · · Score: 1

      Awww, don't ruin their fun man! What else will they do if they can't argue about fickle differences in software platforms?

      Still, they have a lot to argue about in terms of politics and business purpose (esp. with prices the way they are)...

    3. Re:Enough making fun of XP already! by swordgeek · · Score: 2

      OK, I won't argue that. I'd be surprised if XP really _is_ as stable as Linux, or something substantially better (Solaris), but I won't deny it since I've not seen XP running, or worked with it.

      The thing that worries me most about this latest behemoth is the marketing (Oops! I mean licensing) model. As I understand it you will be _forced_ to deal with online registration and all that it entails.

      No making fun here--this is something that should be "discussed" from the mountain peaks at the top of our voices.

      Notwithstanding that, all of the points you make are dead on.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  106. Not surprising... by estoll · · Score: 1

    I was sent an email regarding the Windows XP launch event. You go to the web page http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/go/Local/ and find your location. Ironically, when I tried to get to my location, Rochester, NY, the web page crashed! Go figure.

    --
    http://www.askthevoid.com
  107. how can you educate people like this? by twitter · · Score: 2
    from the nwfusion article, evidence of ignorance making our life miserable:
    Few, if any, business desktop machines are shared these days - so this "feature" will simply get in the way.

    But the scariest thing I heard was that XP allows users to, in essence, set up their own virtual private network (VPN) between any two XP users anywhere in the world. According to IDG News Service reporter Ashlee Vance, the user "can permit a friend to see his screen via a chat-type protocol and even run programs from the original user's machine." Microsoft will publish a way, and provide the tools, for one PC to run software from another - and take over control of another machine.

    Until people like this are taught the reasons for and security implications of user accounts, the world will be rife with viruses and worms. For those who may not know better, unprivalidged user accounts are made so that processes started by them can not alter or remove system files. Malicious programs, intitated by accident, are contained and can be eliminated. Nothing is fool proof but systems that ignore such basic concepts are naked. The "user experience" can be significantly enhanced by truely portable settings, but the primary reason for such stuff is security. The only reason the author is afraid is beacuse of M$'s record of poor implimentation.

    M$'s record is giving the rest of us a bad name too. It's amazing that M$ does not impliment real user accounts. It's negligence. Their users are becoming increasingly distrustful and will never learn better. Just listen to that poor idiot demanding inferior software! The reach out starts with you and me.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  108. No... it's the user-friendly factor. by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

    Windows 2000 was marketed for professional computers. Windows xp is supposed to do what windows 2000 was supposed to do (get users on the nt base.) If I were using Microsoft I wouldn't upgrade to XP... unless I could get it cheaper than w2k... (i.e. win98 upgrade.)

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
  109. How do you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get in and out of a store in 1 minute?

  110. Re:In Other News Today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You suck. Linux rules. Microsoft sucks. I rule.

    Eat my shorts man.

  111. Ohhh, sold! by hoquaim · · Score: 2, Funny

    I read that as "World's First XP System Solid". I thought they were still a few years from a solid OS.

    That was too easy. Mod me down, please.

  112. Yuk! And i thought Linux was the next big thing... by Lispy · · Score: 1

    ...no wait. It is! So why am i reading this news on /.????
    If i would really wanna know i bet some M$-Spokesman will tell me 24/7 during the next weeks on TV...

  113. 2k, XP, AOL. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.

    I've constantly run across AOLers who have severe problems running AOL with 2k and I've heard XP isn't much better.

    (:

    Maybe the AOL'ers will give back to the community that they've taken from for so long, and stop buying MS products.

  114. Bull! by Abstruse · · Score: 1

    Dell sold somewhere in the range of 10,000 system (3500 notebooks and 6500 desktops) with XP on them about a month ago. People are calling in to Dell's tech support with XP questions before us techs were even trained for it. Hell, one of my co-workers got one Saturday night!

    Jason Byrons
    The Abstruse One

    --
    The ABSTRUSE One
    Jason Byrons
    "You all laugh at me because I'm different
    I laugh at you because you're a
  115. Sidenote: Corel Products Don't Run... by suwalski · · Score: 2

    Although I haven't installed my full plethora of Corel software yet, I can tell you that CorelDRAW 10 doesn't run well at all. Opening a file, or creating a new one, freezes the program for a good three minutes on my system, although the program runs fine after that.

    Aswell, I can print. Any 'print' dialog causes the program at hand to freeze. So, after a day of looking around, I've already found two major inconveniences for a desktop publisher such as myself.

    But yeah, it finally hibernates properly, boots at the speed it should, and is fairly solid. But it would be really good if I could actually get any work done on it.

  116. Ebay by PalmIIIC · · Score: 1

    If the dude was smart he would have posted it on ebay

  117. 2 versions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Home and Pro. Never heard of a third, but who knows, Microsoft may have a dozen other variants up their sleeve.

  118. WINXP by networknode · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's not as bad as I thought it would be - on the contrary, it really kicks ass. (Damn, I can't believe I'm even typing this.) But I thought I'd throw my hat in. WIN2K kicks ass too on so many levels - ie. stability, compatibility, flawless plugnpray, usb, nt code ( /. guys, is this based on BSD or something??), etc. WINXP is just well, better. Flawless plugnpray is now ALMOST seamless. I use Cleartype TM (built in) and all my text is crisp, AA'd and far easier on the eyes. Uh, mp3, wow. I select all the mp3's by ctrl-clicking in Explorer, right click, send to audio CD, BOOM. I have made an audio CD in a matter or minutes with no 3rd party software. Built-in burning to cdr is flawless with my old ricoh that chokes on so many burning apps. How about native .zip functionality - very close to using a regular old windows folder. Sorry Winzip, but maybe you get royalties from MS or something? This should have been put in revs ago. Anyhow, try it. Turn off the shitastic default themes too. Go classic. Also, winxp has a TON of services running by default that dont't need to be on. Turn all those off - search google, pages will come up to show which ones do what. Wow. I hate MS and I hate myself for being hooked on something I swore I'd never use after trying a couple of the betas and RC's (pure shit back then). Now? I would honestly say that this one (final) truly is the best yet.

  119. Is it multi-user yet? by Mandelbrute · · Score: 1

    Do file permissions now work in such a way so that one ordinary user can't read all of another ordinary users files?

    1. Re:Is it multi-user yet? by STSeer · · Score: 1

      Yep, you can protect your folders from other users by setting a checkmark on one of the proprties pages for a folder.

  120. Has it crashed yet? by seebs · · Score: 2

    So... the first one has been sold. Has it crashed yet? Been reinstalled?

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
  121. Bill Gates's devilish strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually make a usable version of Windows!

  122. Also Of Note! by NilObject · · Score: 1

    Microsoft also stated that should you choose to pirate Windows XP or dual boot into a *NIX, you will be forced to watch Steve Ballmer's happy dance. Preliminary lab reports showed an incredible 99% success rate of spontaneous head explosions.

    God help us.

  123. And eton and harrow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    schools each have their own game, which have not been as widely spread as the game from rugby school. I don't know about winchester (the other posh school in england).

  124. Strictly Ballroom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Murial's wedding?

    Priscilla queen of the desert?

    Well OK that last one was in the outback as well. Damn! I see your point!

  125. MICROS~1 Activation hotline spamming by tobiasly · · Score: 1

    Someone should start a campaign to spam the MICROS~1 1-800 activation hotline. Maybe a quickie program to call in and then play "All your base are belong to us" over and over? Remember, they have to foot the bill for all those calls!