Slashdot Mirror


Eminem #2 on Gracenote... Before Release

asavage writes "According to this article on news.com last week, Eminem's "The Eminem Show," which was yet to be released, cracked the chart at No. 2. This is the first time an unreleased CD has been number 2 on this list of CD's played in computers." I've pre-ordered my copy and am looking forward to hearing it. But its pretty amazing that Gracenote registers a pirated CD #2 without the benefit of it being for sale yet. Thank god they shut down napster and stopped piracy.

463 comments

  1. A result of copying, not P2P, correct? by swngnmonk · · Score: 1

    Correct me if I'm wrong, isn't this simply a case of people burning copies of existing discs? MP3 being a lossy format & all, even if you grabbed all the tracks from your p2p network of choice, and burned them to disc in the original track order, CDDB wouldn't recognize it as the same disc, right?

    --

    'ARRGH! Pirate Designers of the Internet, we be!'

    1. Re:A result of copying, not P2P, correct? by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 2

      you didnt read the article, did you?

      sigh...

      you're right, this isnt MP3's

      Gracenote checks tracklength down to an obscenely small interval, and uses that to determine "source" - and apparently there are 8 different sources of fake Em cd's floating out there...

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    2. Re:A result of copying, not P2P, correct? by Devastator · · Score: 1

      uhmm, if you had read the article:

      "Gracenote maintains a huge online database that can identify CDs by calling up the exact list and length of songs."

      So yes, if you have all the songs, put them in the right order (and they are the exact same length - which they should be) then it will be identified by cddb (gracenote)

    3. Re:A result of copying, not P2P, correct? by binaryDigit · · Score: 2

      His question was about mp3's and no, you couldn't do what you described with mp3's. They'd have to be saved in uncompressed avi (they could be transfered using a lossless compression though, e.g. zip)

    4. Re:A result of copying, not P2P, correct? by Fletch · · Score: 1

      That is correct; you don't even need to burn it first.

      The MP3 Tag and Rename software I use (windows only, sorry) can take a group of MP3s, create a CDDB checksum, query freeDB for it, and write the artist/album/trackname info into the ID3 tags.

    5. Re:A result of copying, not P2P, correct? by binaryDigit · · Score: 1

      Could be P2P if someone just simply imaged the entire disk, zipped it and then P2P the whole thing (though it'd obviously be quite large).

    6. Re:A result of copying, not P2P, correct? by Cardhore · · Score: 2

      Actually yes, sort of. A newer trend is to rip a CD as just one WAV file, and then encode that to a single MP3 file, "artist - album.mp3".

    7. Re:A result of copying, not P2P, correct? by jx100 · · Score: 1

      Um, is it queries freeDB, then why would Gracenote know anything about it?

    8. Re:A result of copying, not P2P, correct? by Fletch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It doesn't require freeDB, it just uses it by default. It will use CDDB (Gracenote) if that's your poison.

      My point wasn't that this program is responsible for these Gracenote stats, just that it's possible to use a CDDB-like system without having a physical compact disc.

    9. Re:A result of copying, not P2P, correct? by mohaine · · Score: 0, Redundant

      uhmm, you didn't read the article either.

      The company's database examines CDs' tables of contents down to slices just one-seventy-fifth of a second long. Copies that look identical at that scale almost always come from the same master copy, the company says.

      In the case of the Eminem CD, eight slightly different versions accounted for most of the traffic. That means there's likely "eight major guys doing most of the pressing of this," Hyman said.

      --
      (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    10. Re:A result of copying, not P2P, correct? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you people letting your private information flow to the CDDB database? It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this one out.

    11. Re:A result of copying, not P2P, correct? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard of .zip files with all the individual tracks inside, but not a .mp3 of the whole album... Anyway, even if people were doing that, it obviously wouldn't be showing up in cddb's stats, so thats not the issue here (obviously).

    12. Re:A result of copying, not P2P, correct? by gnoshi · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find this is use of AlbumWrap (http://www.infamus.com/albumwrap/) which allows you to have a full CD in a single MP3 file but easily extract it back to the individual tracks. (That said, I always felt mp3cue was a better idea).

    13. Re:A result of copying, not P2P, correct? by lilskater3 · · Score: 1

      uhhg. are you guys all idiots? Of course P2P and file transferring still exsist...i myself am part of the warez underground and i get all my games for free...you can never stop music downloading...havent you ever heard of kazaa? or anyother program like it...sheesh...we live with a planet full of morons...

    14. Re:A result of copying, not P2P, correct? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, reread what he wrote. Did he say that P2P doesn't exist anymore? Read it again, slowly. I know you don't know dat eng'ish 2 gud, so you'll have to trust me here.

    15. Re:A result of copying, not P2P, correct? by octocypher · · Score: 1

      Idiots like you are the one screwing up the escene for everybody else.

    16. Re:A result of copying, not P2P, correct? by proj_2501 · · Score: 2

      The CDDB uses the TOC and a checksum of the data. After going through lossy compression and back, things will have changed.

    17. Re:A result of copying, not P2P, correct? by lilskater3 · · Score: 1

      and what scene would that be? the scene that you aren't a member of?? the fxp scene? elaborate...

    18. Re:A result of copying, not P2P, correct? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does your Mom know you are using her computer without supervision, badass??

  2. sarcasm? by r00tarded · · Score: 1

    was that sarcasm? have you thought that the disk gracenote was regestering was ripped via the net. this is powerful evidence for piracy. hell, if napster was around it woulda been #1!

  3. Gracenote ---- Bah! by BdosError · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yahoo! is reporting that Gracenote (previously CDDB, an open source project) is planning to sell aggregate usage data to advertisers and such like. Makes me glad I use a freedb-based CD player (CD Max, for the curious).

    --
    Complexity is Easy. Simplicity is Hard.
    1. Re:Gracenote ---- Bah! by alphaseven · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I don't blame them, information like billboard charts and soundscan sales are worth a lot of money to record companies, gracenotes information would be even more valuable, as it shows what people are actually listening to, as opposed to just buying. I miss gracenotes top 100, the chart would largely similar to the billboard charts, but with older albums mixed in. It's amazing how many classic albums, such as Pink Floyd, Nirvana, old Metallica, sit there next to Eminem and Linkin Park. And why is Celine Dion in the top ten?

    2. Re:Gracenote ---- Bah! by danro · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't blame them (except for propretorizing the data their users submitted in good faith, but I won't go into that now...) But since they are less usable to me then they used to be, I don't use them any more.
      To my knowledge there isn't one single selling point (to consumers) for Gracenote that doesn't go for freedb too.

      --

      "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
    3. Re:Gracenote ---- Bah! by P.+Legba · · Score: 1

      And why is Celine Dion in the top ten?

      A better question might be "how is Celine Dion in the top 10?", since it crashes computers when you try to play it on a computer...oh yeah...felt-tip marker.

      :-)

      P.

    4. Re:Gracenote ---- Bah! by cosyne · · Score: 3, Interesting

      it shows what people are actually listening to

      Well, kinda. Assuming the player program caches the information locally, Gracenote's records show what disks people are putting into their computers the first time they put them in. Granted, that gives older records a better representaiton than current sales, but still not that accurate. Of course, if most people re-install windoze as often as i need to, the accuracy could increase signifigantly...

    5. Re:Gracenote ---- Bah! by dpu · · Score: 1

      on behalf of Canada, i apologize for celine dion. we honestly thought she was going to sing Desmond Child songs that American groups didn't buy. then some fool handed her a sheet of paper, a pen, and said "shut up, your voice is irritating the shit out of me!" the rest (sadly) is history...

      --
      Dammit, I meant to post that anonymously!
    6. Re:Gracenote ---- Bah! by Library+Spoff · · Score: 1

      Another reason that we should have a `Taste Officer` in the U.N.

      This persons office(and hey *I'm* volunteering)would approve all new record company signings/Cover versions.

      A number of shady International hitmen would be employed to enforce the offices rulings...
      (accidental botox OD ? )

      just an idea people, sowing the seeds...

      --
      Acid House saves Souls
    7. Re:Gracenote ---- Bah! by Binky+The+Oracle · · Score: 2

      I really don't understand the knee-jerk objection many slashdotters seem to have with non-personalized, aggregated usage data collection and sales... as long as privacy is maintained and there's no identifying information collected, I think it's a great idea and I'd be doing the same thing in their place.

      And quite franky, I also don't really understand the objection people have to CDDB taking information voluntarily provided by users and licensing their collection to other sources. Seems like a pretty smart way of making money to me: get your product produced as cheaply as possible, provide a service to millions of people for free, and charge the people who want to make money off the service a licensing fee.

      Now if CDDB had said "we're a free service and we'll always be a free service" then changed their tune (like Microsoft saying they would never ever ever ever ever never never ever ever ever never never sell personal information collected from their free web services), well... that's a slightly different story, but the end user is still getting a good deal. I've submitted tracks for about 10 or 15 albums. I've downloaded the track listings for nearly all of my 1500+ CDs. I think I got a pretty good deal.

      What is so evil about wanting to make money? The way I see it, there are four reasons to invent something cool:

      1. Laziness
      2. Profit
      3. Natural inventive drive
      4. Complete selflessness and a desire to make things better for all mankind.

      Number 4 generally requires that you have some other means of supporting yourself, though.

      If Gracenote were selling personalized marketing info so that Sony/Vivendi/UltraMegaCorp could send me targeted spam, well then I'd drop that like a hot potato (and I will drop it if you ever start, so watch it, Gracenote). But all they're doing is counting up how many times certain albums get played, and I don't see a big, bad, evil plot in that. Labels want that info and are willing to buy it, Gracenote has that info. Why shouldn't they sell it?

      --

      Slashdot comments... splitting hairs since 1997.

  4. Good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they put those parental advisory stickers on the CDs so that kids downloading the mp3s will know they are "naughty!"

  5. Piracy.. NOO! by Fyz · · Score: 1

    I recently filled out a form to get a guarantee on my new speakers. One of the marketing questions asked: "How many times have you downloaded music from the internet?(check one): -Never -1 time -2-5 times -More than 5 times" Uuuh..

    1. Re:Piracy.. NOO! by FuddChuckles · · Score: 1

      Looks like that's the way of the world. I entered a poll to win a dvd burner from Blender (http://www.blender.com/contests/reader_poll/) and they asked how many songs were on my harddrive. Not necessarily the same thing as downloading from the Internet, granted, but the implication is there.

      Not sure what the pupose is. Maybe Blender will sell the info to the RIAA for their next whine-fest to Congress....

      Sigh.

      -FC

    2. Re:Piracy.. NOO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I download music more than 5 times per month.

      I pay emusic for the privilege, and I think
      it's worth it.

    3. Re:Piracy.. NOO! by Eccles · · Score: 2

      I know I've downloaded more than five songs... legally. They may be trying to figure out how much of a market there is for downloadable music, not whether you're a leech.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  6. Mass-produced CDs by zerosignal · · Score: 1

    These must be mass-produced bootlegs, because CD-Rs would all have different IDs and would show up as different discs in on CDDB.com. Or am I wrong?

    1. Re:Mass-produced CDs by BagOBones · · Score: 2, Informative

      As long as you make an Image or a 1:1 copy it will be detected as the same disk.. Its manly determined from track lengths and offsets.

      --
      EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
    2. Re:Mass-produced CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are wrong.

    3. Re:Mass-produced CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm a fairly major player in the MP3 "scene" if you will. The proper releases (this stuff rarely hits the P2P networks in all it's glory) are done by people who know what they're doing and rip things with good software. If all the tracks are from a proper release, and burned using DAO, they will almost always be recognized by CDDB services as the original CD. People ripping for P2P nets though generally use low bitrates and bad encoders (Realjuke, AudioCatalyst and the like). Not to mention that most people using P2P networks don't bother to ensure that all tracks are complete, from the same source rip, and of reasonable quality. Thus small differences in encoders/rippers (are track delays recorded in the preceding track, or the subsequent one?) result in different final CDs. Rest assured, however, that the people who know what they're doing (and there are thousands of us) get proper copies, distribute them to our friends, and burn copies for anyone who asks. Hence the numbers on Gracenote. Don't think the mp3 scene is as disorganized as it appears from the P2P crap, the real underground scene is very organized, well structured, and produces good releases.

      Sorry for the AC, I dunno how much crap I could get in if some copyright nazi read this and investigated what I do.

    4. Re:Mass-produced CDs by $0+31337 · · Score: 0

      Sorry for the AC, I dunno how much crap I could get in if some copyright nazi read this and investigated what I do.

      And yet you claim to be a "major player"? I'm pretty sure that any real self-promoting pirate would know the penalties incurred from violating copyrights ($100,000 fine and/or 5 years in prison for every copyright infringment). Another point is that most of the stuff on the P2P networks is the stuff ripped by the people that know what they're doing. If you can get the new Eminem CD off the P2P networks, and you can, then you know it came from an insider which then went to a real MP3 group like RNS and finally on the the endusers (you) computer and on a P2P network.

      Sorry for the AC, I dunno how much crap I could get in if this lamer learns how to read and actually makes it through my post

    5. Re:Mass-produced CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be quite a "major player" in the mp3 scene if you don't know that the blank space on a cd is the space between the tracks and is thus not ripped at all. A major player would surely also know that the bitrate has absolutely nothing to do with the length of the resulting audio track, and that crap encoders would result in the same playback length (albeit at a lower quality) as a good encoder (or no encoder at all).

      Major player my ass. I don't think you have anything to worry about from the "copyright nazis" investigating you - *you* don't even know what you do. :)

    6. Re:Mass-produced CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try MV43Z |00|Z

    7. Re:Mass-produced CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently played an Audio CD I'd burned from MP3's and CDDB recognised it as a copy of the original. Are they getting smart like Napster did and detecting CDDA signatures ? Makes you wonder. What are the odds of myself and another person burning an audio CD from MP3's with identical CRCs ?

    8. Re:Mass-produced CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Try MV43Z |00|Z

      on this list, we speak english.
      thank you.

    9. Re:Mass-produced CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'm a fairly major player in the MP3 "scene" if you will.

      Thanks - best giggle I've had all day.

      --Sorry for the AC, I dunno how much crap I could get in if some misdirected teenager read this and investigated what I do.

    10. Re:Mass-produced CDs by pstreck · · Score: 1

      I'm a major player in OGG scen!

      --

      Later,
      Phil
  7. And #1 was... by bravehamster · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...Britney Spear's unreleased, unrecorded next album "Oops,Wö%it my slave again" was ranked #1.

    --
    ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    1. Re:And #1 was... by bravehamster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmm...either Mozilla or Slashdot mangled my post after I submitted. The preview sure didn't have those funky characters.

      --
      ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    2. Re:And #1 was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, Slashdot posting is a lossy format.

    3. Re:And #1 was... by Cardhore · · Score: 2

      There you go--at slashdot.org we don't spell wrong, we spell lossy.

    4. Re:And #1 was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was part of the joke... something about crappy MP3 ID tags...

    5. Re:And #1 was... by bravehamster · · Score: 1
      Umm...if I said that's what I meant, would it make it more funny or less?

      --
      ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    6. Re:And #1 was... by banka · · Score: 0

      actually, slashdot readers are a lossy medium

  8. mm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    255p
    by now... i never get the first one.... ::sniff::

    As for M&M, he can "suck my dick". P2P rox0rz.

    I would continue if this hadn't been fully fleshed out in previous discussions.

  9. Scary by --daz-- · · Score: 1, Troll

    The real scary part of this blurb is that Eminem is ranked #2 at something. There are enough people out there that take him seriously. Now THAT is scary...

    1. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said anything about taking him seriously? I listen to his music quite often, mostly because I find it amusing and enjoyable to listen to. Sure, the lyrics are WAY out there, and he's not all that original, but what the fuck is wrong with liking something?

      Also, this kind of music/humor appeals to younger kids because of the humor involved. If you listen to the new album, the song "Drips" is nothing more than teenage humor about STDs. It's good for a sophmoric laugh.

      And if you actually try to understand his songs, it can get really interesting. A lot of the objectional content that Eminem puts out is in the guise of Slim Shady, his ultra-violent alter ego. There a couple good nodes about it over on E2... try here for an interesting look at Eminem's different personas and here for other views, etc.

    2. Re:Scary by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      What's even scarier is that you, and many pro-censorship fanatics, presume that Eminem must be "taken seriously" to be enjoyed as an artist (I personal think he's brilliant. I'm a married professional adult, yet I have his CDs so far, and will buy the new one when I can. Perhaps I'm a "wigger", but instead I appreciate his art). Does this mean that acts of serial killers (and self-driving clown trucks) will break out across the land because Stephen King books are on the best seller list? Is the movie AOTCs an indiciation that we're headed for war with the empire (or whoever)? No, it's all just fantasy art, and the only scary ones are those that fail to see that.

    3. Re:Scary by coraxo · · Score: 1

      Eminem ??? who or what the fuck is eminem ?? is it sth like laurel and hardy or barb. streisand ?

      --
      Strc prst skrz krk and vomit! Can help.
    4. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody takes Eminem seriously except real tightasses. Now, unless I got a bad joke track, the new song I found is just him saying "This looks like a job for me, so everybody just follow me, cause we need a little controversy cause it feels so empty without me." Over and over and over and over for 5 minutes! Did someone just loop this or is this the actual song? If that's the actual song and not a joke then Eminem has really jumped the fucking shark. That song sucks. Come up with some words dude. At least "Stan" had some good lyrics to follow along to. I like Eminem's version better than Dido's original boring song.

    5. Re:Scary by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      That isn't the real song, though I've heard the same one. Indeed, there appears to be an ENORMOUS number of bogus tracks out there masquerading as Eminem tracks (either they snipped off beginning or ends, or the middle is all horrendous digital noise, etc) : It appears that either there are a lot of people with strange motivations who are bored, or alternately that the RIAA/Eminem's crew are polluting the sharing networks with bogus copies (seems very likely as few others would have the motivation that these people seem to have).

  10. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  11. A good test case for the 'Marketability' of piracy by Bonker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just like Spidey and Star Wars, The Eminem Show can be taken as a good test case for how piracy *really* affects sales.

    In Spider-Man's and Star Wars's cases, it appears that the piracy either had no effect on the incredible revenue both movies generated, or actually had a marketing effect. People who downloaded the pirate version were *more* likely to go see the in-threater version.

    I suspect that The Eminem Show will do the same thing. Just like a label pays a radio station to play a promo-only single before an album's release, the pirate copies of The Eminem Show will encourage people who hear them to go get the album.

    Pay close attention to the figures, and when someone tries to tell you that 'piracy hurt the artist', recite them verbatim!

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  12. UH, haven't you heard? by CmdrTaco+(troll) · · Score: 1, Funny
    It is official; Netcraft confirms: *DB is dying

    One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered *DB community when IDC confirmed that *DB market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that *DB has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *DB is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last [samag.com] in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin [amdest.com] to predict *DB's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *DB faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *DB because *DB is dying. Things are looking very bad for *DB. As many of us are already aware, *DB continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.

    FreeDB is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time FreeDB developers Jordan Hubbard and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: FreeDB is dying.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    OpenDB leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of OpenDB. How many users of NetDB are there? Let's see. The number of OpenDB versus NetDB posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetDB users. DB/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetDB posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of DB/OS. A recent article put FreeDB at about 80 percent of the *DB market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeDB users. This is consistent with the number of FreeDB Usenet posts.

    Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, FreeDB went out of business and was taken over by DBI who sell another troubled OS. Now DBI is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.

    All major surveys show that *DB has steadily declined in market share. *DB is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If *DB is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dabblers. *DB continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, *DB is dead.

    Fact: *DB is dying

    --

    I hope high gas prices are depriving your children, you fucking dumbass.
    1. Re:UH, haven't you heard? by BdosError · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Good stuff, which I had mod points for you.

      --
      Complexity is Easy. Simplicity is Hard.
  13. more than Mozart? by twocents · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh dear, my idealism is shattered, now that I know that Slashdot readers listen to "pop"ular music as opposed to only Pagannine, Vivaldi, and Mozart.

    I just don't know how to handle this.

    1. Re:more than Mozart? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Your note made me want to mention Epitonic It's the best place to find legal MP3s that rock.

      I recommend checking out The Danielson Famile and The Legendary Pink Dots. Both great stuff.

      I have no affiliation with any of the aforementioned things, it's just a great way to get away from supporting the RIAA without listening to only classical music.

      (Who listens to that punk kid M&M anyway?)

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:more than Mozart? by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      Oh dear, my idealism is shattered, now that I know that Slashdot readers listen to "pop"ular music as opposed to only Pagannine, Vivaldi, and Mozart.

      This really surprises you? I would have guessed that the Slashdot audience listened to classical music slightly more than their age group, and country music slightly less, but I wouldn't expect a real strong correlation anyway.

      Personally, what little classical music I listen to is usually fast and furious, although I also enjoy a good classical orchastra backing up a good rock band.

    3. Re:more than Mozart? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be "Paganini", you fucking slopehead.

  14. What needs to be done next ... by xdangavinx · · Score: 1

    Is to find a way to pirate music that the artist hasn't even written yet.

    1. Re:What needs to be done next ... by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Funny

      Isn't that sorta what Milli Vanilli did?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:What needs to be done next ... by StaticLimit · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...a way to pirate music that the artist hasn't even written yet

      Too late...

      The Beatles already did that to Oasis.

      - StaticLimit

    3. Re:What needs to be done next ... by RvonG · · Score: 3, Funny

      The concept of anticipatory plagiarism was invented by Robert Merton (http://www.nobel.se/economics/laureates/1997/), though the French Oulipo movement (http://www.nous.org.uk/oulipo.html) stole the idea and passed it off as their own decades earlier.

  15. Anti-Piracy measures on this album by fobbman · · Score: 2

    Any word on whether there will be anti-piracy measures on this album? Kinda like retro-fitting a better hull design for the Titanic, but still...

    1. Re:Anti-Piracy measures on this album by Ken+Williams · · Score: 2

      no. there were not any anti-piracy measures.

      --
      -- ken williams
    2. Re:Anti-Piracy measures on this album by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aren't you that idiot married to the stupid whore who made the Kings Quest games?

    3. Re:Anti-Piracy measures on this album by Grax · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't help. cnn.com already published the method of circumventing anti-piracy measures using a black marker.

      Copy protection is impossible really. If you prevent all copying then there is no way to get the information from the disk to your ear.

      If the computer industry couldn't come up with a working copy protection scheme with all the years they have put into it then it seems kinda unrealistic to expect them to come up with one now just because the music or movie industry wants it.

    4. Re:Anti-Piracy measures on this album by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

      You meant copy restriction measures?

      Nope, none I know.

      --
      IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    5. Re:Anti-Piracy measures on this album by IHavePowers · · Score: 1

      No, he is the General Manager of the Chicago Whitesox.

  16. But this will actually boost record sales, right? by gripdamage · · Score: 1

    I'm sure that every one of those with a pirated CD-R copy of the album will be buying a legal CD now that it is available.

  17. major error in the article by Ken+Williams · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the Eminem CD was on the shelves and for sale at my local record store on May 21. i purchased it on May 24 (and have the receipt to prove it). of course, when i called the record store today to ask about when the initially put it in the shelves and started selling it, their reply was "Today!". when i told them i purchased it from them on May 24, their reply was "that's entirely possible". when i then asked again when they started selling it, they replied "Today!". i think they were afraid that i might be a spy for the RIAA. ;)

    --
    -- ken williams
    1. Re:major error in the article by Millyways · · Score: 1

      This would make a lot more sense than some story about how if you get all the mp3s and assemble them in the right order and burn to CD it still is recognised as the original.

      I am certain that the ranking would be mainly due to actually copying of CD media that may have "Accidently" been sold before the "release date".

    2. Re:major error in the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're an idiot.

    3. Re:major error in the article by Ken+Williams · · Score: 2

      thanks for playing! please insert another quarter and try again.

      --
      -- ken williams
    4. Re:major error in the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aren't you that idiot married to the stupid whore who made the Kings Quest games?

    5. Re:major error in the article by ElBooto · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I've done that (burnt from mp3s) and cddb does recognise them.... scary.

  18. It is available - It was released Sunday by joeflies · · Score: 4, Informative
    Before making too many conclusions, it should be noted that the CD is already available, released on a non-traditional Sunday. So part of that stat is mixed with legit sales.

    "Thus, "The Eminem Show," originally slated for a June 4 release, hit stores Sunday -- an unusual step, as albums are typically released on Tuesdays. That move came after it was earlier announced that the release date would be pushed up to today -- roughly two weeks after the album's unsanctioned Internet debut."

    story Here

  19. Re:A good test case for the 'Marketability' of pir by reaper20 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I agree and disagree. Watching a crappy divx rip of Spidey or AOTC makes me want to appreciate their full glory on the big screen with decent sound.

    Listening to a near perfect copy of the CD version, makes me want to .... not bother buying it.

    I think that piracy definately adds to the buzz of a product, but its much easier to justify the cost of the actual product when the quality for the 'real thing' is substantially better than the pirated version.

  20. Tired Argument Alert by Zen+Mastuh · · Score: 3, Funny
    There are enough people out there that take him seriously...

    • Johnny Cash: "I once shot a man just to watch him die"
    • [remainder of list is up to you to complete]
    Oh my god what is the world coming to!!! Someone needs to protect the children, etc., etc...

    Newsflash: artists are mirrors of society--some are like hubble mirrors, some are like funhouse mirrors. Eminem is not the problem. He is merely a messenger, like Johnny Cash. If Eminem's lyrics are scary, you haven't been paying enough attention.

    --
    "What is the sound of one belly slapping?"
    1. Re:Tired Argument Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By "take him seriously" I think he meant to actually care about a new Eminem album.

      It's scary that this many people think Eminem's lame music is cool enough to get a pirate copy! Because he sucks!

      Understand?

    2. Re:Tired Argument Alert by antibryce · · Score: 2
      I don't think Eminem's message is scary, but his tired attempt at making really bad whiteboy hip-hop is. His lack of talent and musical skills is what scares me.

      It's the difference between Jerry Springer and a decent show on A&E or the Discovery Channel. One is an example of "look! Freaks! You can't stop watching the freaks!" while the other is an example of serious analysis of a situation with real in-depth thought put into it.

    3. Re:Tired Argument Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it's:

      "When I was a / baby Mamma told me son / now be a Good boy / Don't ever play with guns / but I shot a man in reno / just to watch him die."

      And he's singing about going to prison.

    4. Re:Tired Argument Alert by The+Turd+Report · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Newsflash: Eminem is not an artist. He is a product of some corp record label. He is as much of an artist as any ranting kook on a street corner.

    5. Re:Tired Argument Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Um, Eminem is a really good rapper. You don't get people like Dr. Dre involved unless you have talent. I think Chris Rock said it best on Dennis Miller -- something to the effect of "I don't know what's going on anymore. The best golfer is black, and the best rapper is white."

    6. Re:Tired Argument Alert by garyrich · · Score: 2

      I don't think he was saying Eminem is bad/scary evil. More along the lines of
      Eminem: sucks
      Johnny Cash: Doesn't suck

      Refelections of society? If so
      Society: sucks

      --
      -- your Web browser is Ronald Reagan
    7. Re:Tired Argument Alert by Daetrin · · Score: 1
      If Eminem is a _good_ rapper, then I'm glad I've stayed away from the genre as a whole, and especially glad that I've not heard too much of the stuff that's _worse_ than what he does.

      It's not the content that bothers me, just that the music sucks.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    8. Re:Tired Argument Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well do you like rap music? Do you like pop music? Different styles of music sound different. Johnny Cash is/was a very good country artist. Eminem is (was?) a very good rap artist. They've both been influential and progressive for their time in their styles. They're *both* good musicians, but if you don't like a style of music you're clearly not going to like anybody who plays that music. What exactly don't you like about Eminem's music?

    9. Re:Tired Argument Alert by KaiserSoze · · Score: 4, Insightful

      His lack of talent and musical skills is what scares me.

      Wow, the analytical mind of Slashdot. I would argue that if there was one artist who has an excess of talent when compared to the Corporate Songwriting of America, it is Eminem. Yes, I am aware that the vast majority of Slashdot hates rap/hip-hop, and Eminem makes an easy target, but your logic escapes me: he's just white! he a poser "whitebread" trying to make black music! and even if he was black, RAP SUX, so I win anyways!

      C'mon, I know this is your opinion, and the 4 posts directly below yours as well, but I think we can agree that a.) Eminem writes his own songs, b.) Eminem performs his own songs, and c.) Eminem has a command of the English language [his ryhming schemes, on a poetically-analyzed level, are very complex]. All of the above point to the fact that Eminem does have musical talent. I am assuming that you think he sucks because he doesn't play classic rock or perhaps early 90's alt-rock, those untouchable bastions of geek-musicdom that everyone is assumed to like.

      Eminem's got a lot of problems, plus he says "fuck" a lot, which as we all know causes Satan to enter childrens' groins [thanks Seanbaby], but I think his lack of talent is not one of those problems.

      --

      "What we elect to call imagination is mere combination of things not heretofore combined." - Frank Norris

    10. Re:Tired Argument Alert by npsimons · · Score: 1
      Eminem is not the problem. He is merely a messenger


      Messenger? Hah! Eminem is just a spoiled, overrated brat. He's not a cause, he's one of the symptoms. If you want to hear some really accurate social commentary, listen very closely to the lyrics from songs by The Offspring sometime.

    11. Re:Tired Argument Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newsflash : "Artists" will do anything to get attention.
      What fucked up society do you live in? There is hardly any violence where I live (Canada), yet I am constantly bombarded with sick, talentless, ultra-violent American "music", that bears no resemblence to reality (Eminem).

    12. Re:Tired Argument Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eminem IS NOT an artist. He is a MISOGYNISTIC ASSHOLE with a GOOD(LUCKY?) PRODUCER. And all you eminem FANBOYS are taking it UP THE ASS from the record companies. So keep on SUCKING THAT CORPORATE DICK and take it back to the yahoo message boards WHERE YOU ALL BELONG.

    13. Re:Tired Argument Alert by antibryce · · Score: 2
      but I think we can agree that a.) Eminem writes his own songs, b.) Eminem performs his own songs, and c.) Eminem has a command of the English language [his ryhming schemes, on a poetically-analyzed level, are very complex].


      I won't agree that he writes his own songs. Were you with him when he wrote them? I think most people would be amazed at how little most pop musicians contribute to the actual music on an album. Madonna doesn't write any of her music, and never has. As for performing his songs, I wasn't aware he played any instruments. I thought he just held a microphone on stage, and occasionally performed goofy antics like dressing up as Jason Vorhees. Just look at the credits for his last album Doesn't appear he played any instruments. "primary artist" is a very vague term, one I would be willing to bet was invented by a studio exec.


      His command of the English language is a very subjective thing, and at that point we're getting more into the content of his songs, not the actual music talent involved.


      Bottom line, he's the current Marilyn Manson. Shockrock has been around forever, and has been very tired and dull for at least 30 years.

    14. Re:Tired Argument Alert by PMM · · Score: 0

      this sentiment should be modded up.

      I dont like emnmnnm's music & i think hes a fucking moron, but it is obvious he has a talent, in the same vein i cant stand classical music but there is obvious talent behind the composers & musician's

      mocking other peoples preference for music just makes you look like an idiot

    15. Re:Tired Argument Alert by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      I don't want to defend Eminem but the underlying message (underlying the fag word and the rest which is shock factor which every "artist" uses).

      What he says in the song "Square Dance" is quite powerful. But the thing isn't "him" it's what music in general says.

      Music (in America) has always made the older status quo people angry. It attempts to bring about change on a level of peace and change your mind.

      If you don't like one artists message then you can't simply say "they suck". If you don't like their music then you can say they "suck" but it's simply objective.

      Sure, Eminem said "fag" a million times. I'm guessing that he didn't mean anyone gay in most points. When I was younger I called my brother a "fag" and he called me one. It had nothing to do with homosexuality. Now that so many people complained it has become one more thing for him to say to piss you off.

      I bet half the population hates Cash... you don't ... see it's objective.

      Society does suck. If it didn't we wouldn't have politics (and so many things I don't feel like typing).

      As long as there are people dying or people starving or wars or something then you will hear "sucky" music.

    16. Re:Tired Argument Alert by KaiserSoze · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I won't agree that he writes his own songs. Were you with him when he wrote them? I think most people would be amazed at how little most pop musicians contribute to the actual music on an album. Madonna doesn't write any of her music, and never has. As for performing his songs, I wasn't aware he played any instruments. I thought he just held a microphone on stage, and occasionally performed goofy antics like dressing up as Jason Vorhees. Just look at the credits for his last album [barnesandnoble.com] Doesn't appear he played any instruments. "primary artist" is a very vague term, one I would be willing to bet was invented by a studio exec.

      His command of the English language is a very subjective thing, and at that point we're getting more into the content of his songs, not the actual music talent involved.

      It is very easy to see if he writes his own songs. Look at the liner notes, and see if M. Mathers appears under the written by credit. I believe it does. If you don't wish to believe that credit, then you are too cynical to be swayed by any argument of mine, so stop reading now.

      As to your second point, many musicians have, as you so callously put it, "just held a microphone on stage". Are opera singers musicians? Are gospel singers musicans? I believe that your argument just insulted hundreds of artists, perhaps even some that you hold in a high regard (though I admit you don't stipulate what makes one a musucian, thus your entire musical worldview could consist of Celtic drum beats, and I would have to admit defeat based on your subjective point of view).

      One more thing, I can't see a reason why what Eminem wears has anything to do with his value as a musician. Christ, John Lennon was running around naked on camera, with a naked woman no less. [Flamers please note my sarcasm].

      Finally, if you would like to dismiss Eminem out-of-hand for the content of his songs, then pass Go and collect $200. It's very easy to dismiss artists that put society's collective taboos and psychoses on display. Personally, I believe that one can experience a sort of catharsis from albums such as this one, if only when you realize that your life is so much better than the nightmarish hell that Slim Shady/Eminem/Marshall Mathers seems to inhabit.

      --

      "What we elect to call imagination is mere combination of things not heretofore combined." - Frank Norris

    17. Re:Tired Argument Alert by TWR · · Score: 2
      ...and listening to The Beastie Boys' "Paul Revere" made millions of white, suburban boys ride off on a horse, rape a cop's daughter, kill four people, and rob a bar.

      Heck, those honky slackers didn't even fight for their right to party...

      -jon

      --

      Remember Amalek.

    18. Re:Tired Argument Alert by psamuels · · Score: 1
      It's very easy to dismiss artists that put society's collective taboos and psychoses on display.

      It's also very easy to dismiss artists who think they're being cool and/or shocking and/or tortured and/or neurotic but whose quirks are a lame, transparent stage show.

      This is a variation on the Sagan quote about Bozo the Clown. Just because you're dismissed by society at large doesn't mean you have necessarily hit a sore spot society is afraid to face.

      I have no particular opinion on Eminem; just thought I'd throw that out.

      --
      "How can you claim that you are anti-crack, while still writing a window manager?" — Metacity README
    19. Re:Tired Argument Alert by Dirtside · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I once shot a man just to watch him die. Then I got distracted and missed it." -- Kids in the Hall

      Yeah, it's off-topic. So what?

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    20. Re:Tired Argument Alert by antibryce · · Score: 1
      It is very easy to see if he writes his own songs. Look at the liner notes, and see if M. Mathers appears under the written by credit. I believe it does.


      Ok, so did he write the music, or the lyrics? Perhaps I am cynical, but it's not hard to believe the studio execs would buy off some songwriters to hold up M. Mathers as a genius. Sara Mclachlan is a perfect example of this. The studio hired a musician to "help" her learn to write songs. He ended up writing most of her first album, but the studio wanted to present her as a female musical genius, so payed him off to keep him quiet. I know the musician involved, and believe him 100%. In fact, he ended up suing her and the record company because they never did pay him.


      As to your second point, many musicians have, as you so callously put it, "just held a microphone on stage". Are opera singers musicians? Are gospel singers musicans? I believe that your argument just insulted hundreds of artists, perhaps even some that you hold in a high regard


      You stated he performed his own songs, which I took to mean he played an instrument. My mistake. But again, Madonna performs her own songs, but she didn't write any of them. I would argue that someone who just sings is not a musician, but a vocalist. If they play an instrument, or write music, then they're a musician. Not that being a vocalist is any lesser than a musician, just a distinction I make.


      Finally, if you would like to dismiss Eminem out-of-hand for the content of his songs, then pass Go and collect $200. It's very easy to dismiss artists that put society's collective taboos and psychoses on display.


      My whole point is that he isn't putting anything on display for any reason other than to shock people and make more money. Which is what makes him fall squarely in the "shockrock" category (perhaps "shockrap" would be a better term.) The entire current crop of rap and hiphop artists are just tired rehashed of the mid-90's crap. Someone realized it makes money, so they market market market.


      I realize how pointless it is to argue with someone so obviously blind to what pop music is. Because that's exactly what Eminem is, POP music. No better or worse than Britney or the latest boy bands. You think his content makes him more thoughtful and intelligent? His content is obviously poorly written stories loosely strung together by words designed to get people upset (bitch, cunt, fag, slut, etc.) He's a marketing gimic.

    21. Re:Tired Argument Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't care one way or another about eminem or how popular some list says he is. I can't relate to his lyrics at all (i grew up in an inner city metro area). I don't think the actual music itself is all the interesting and most hip hop sounds all too much the same to me. There is some that I like, for example is an atheist hip hop artist named Aesop Rock. He is someone I can relate to lyrically. Otherwise I prefer mostly scandinavian, some northern african, most asian countries (ie russian) cultural music and a lot of classical music.
      I want to puke on most of todays American pop bands.

    22. Re:Tired Argument Alert by Deskpoet · · Score: 1

      Amen to that.

      Eminem is an artist in the same way that a marketing professional is. That's not completely accurate, of course: most hacks can at least string the occasional sentence together. Without the word fuck, Emimem would be stuck using nouns (and precious few adjectives.)

      The real question is: why would anyone pirate his crap? Hell, with a cheap copy of Acid lying around, I'd rather listen to me cursing over a tired drum loop....

      Which brings up another more interesting question: are there any decent looping programs out there on Linux?

      --
      "The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws."--Tacitus, The Histories
    23. Re:Tired Argument Alert by shepd · · Score: 2

      Opera singers and gospel singers don't need an act to make good music (note, I don't like opera or gospel, so by good, I mean it pleases the people that listen to that music).

      Strip away the facade that is "Slim Shady" and you'll quickly notice that you're left with a B-rate "musician".

      IMHO, if Eminem is anything he's a top notch actor. However, acting and singing are entirely different things.

      And I feel the "nightmarish hell" Eminem purports to exist is nothing but a self induced problem, likely caused by a lifetime of poor decisions that were entirely his to make (or it's been caused by strong prompting from others). If you're stupid enough to do the dumb shit he sings about then I doubt you have the mental capacity to properly understand the meaning (if any) of his music. This leaves the usefulness of his music just a tad flat.

      The salt to test whether someone is musician or actor is to have people who enjoy the genre but haven't heard the artist's music listen to a CD of the music sans any art or name. If that is also popular common sense dictates they are a musician. If not, they are all act.

      I would suspect that if this new CD were labeled "The flattones - Music that is OK" it'd be in the bottom 1000 CDs.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    24. Re:Tired Argument Alert by Radrik · · Score: 1

      so did he write the music, or the lyrics?

      Eminem writes all his own lyrics, and the majority of the songs on the CD are produced by him. In the rap industry this means he made the beats and basically put the song together by himself.

    25. Re:Tired Argument Alert by garyrich · · Score: 2

      maybe I'm too old to "get" his swinging phat grooves. Fine. I'd be happier if he made me angry. He doesn't. He's just deadly dull to me. He's as predictable as Brintney Spears, just marketed to a different audience.

      --
      -- your Web browser is Ronald Reagan
    26. Re:Tired Argument Alert by P.+Legba · · Score: 0, Troll

      Um, Eminem is a really good rapper.

      Almost the top turd on the dungpile...

      P.

    27. Re:Tired Argument Alert by dietz · · Score: 1

      Ok, so did he write the music, or the lyrics?

      Sir, it is clear you are just babbling and you have no fucking clue what you're talking about.

      Eminem freestyles constantly. He got second place in 1997's Rap Olympics, devoted to freestyling (well before he was backed by Dre). He has also been on The Wake Up Show (a radio show devoted to lyricists, very well respected in the underground hip-hop community) countless times, again before he was ever backed by Dre or on a label.

      Eminem can and does write his own lyrics.

      If you want to argue that he's a sell-out, go for it. If you want to argue that he's not a real musician because he doesn't play an instrument, go for it. (He did do most of the production on his new album, but in the hip-hop world that rarely means actually touching an instrument).

      But if you want to claim that he doesn't have talent and that he doesn't write his own lyrics, you're just going to make yourself look like a moron who's never even done a cursory investigation of the topic you're arguing. And that's exactly what you've done.

    28. Re:Tired Argument Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why post AC, Taco?

    29. Re:Tired Argument Alert by KaiserSoze · · Score: 1

      Strip away the facade that is "Slim Shady" and you'll quickly notice that you're left with a B-rate "musician".

      Strip away the personalty of any entertainer, and you're left with a "B-rate" level instance of that form of entertainment. Eminem doesn't rap about bling, ice, dubs, or his money. I can name other rappers that can also defy the current stereotype, but can you? If you can, color me impressed; but the fact is that Eminem expresses himself in a way contrary to the majority of rappers at this moment in the movement and if it takes Eminem to shift the genre away from "riding on them thangs like ev-er-ry-day" to "I don't speak/I float in the air trapped in a sheet/I'm not a real person/I'm a ghost trapped in the beat", then I will support him as an artist.

      If you're stupid enough to do the dumb shit he sings about then I doubt you have the mental capacity...

      I'm going to assume that you meant the above "you" in the general sense, because I believe that I've presented points in a straightforward manner that proves my intelligence. But if you actually believe that I'd "breathe ether in three lethal amounts/ while I stab myself in the knee with a diseased needle", let me assure you that I don't do drugs, beat my wife, kill people, or much else that Shady advocates.

      The salt to test whether someone is musician or actor is to have people who enjoy the genre but haven't heard the artist's music listen to a CD of the music sans any art or name...

      Every single person I know who enjoys hip-hop at least respects Eminem rhyming ability, if they don't like his content. I will also respond in advance to your ad hominem attacks against my friends by saying that the majority are college graduates, from English and Poli Sci majors, to Comp Sci (like myself) and Engineering graduates. By your own definition (at least in my social circle of approximately 100 people who like rap/hip-hop), Eminem is a musician.

      --

      "What we elect to call imagination is mere combination of things not heretofore combined." - Frank Norris

    30. Re:Tired Argument Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent analysis. Speaking as a high-schooler when his first CD came out, most here on slashdot would be surprised how many "geeks" and how many in the top 5% of their high school class love, and I mean absolutely love his music. Maybe you have to be from a newer generation, but you can definitely read very, very far into not just what he says, but how he's saying it. In my AP English class, virtually every person in it concurred that Eminem, specifially the original "slim shasy" is a truly insightful commentary on society. Take that for what you will.

      Imagine that, someone saying the Eminem is insightful...god, this is never going to get modded up ;)

    31. Re:Tired Argument Alert by shepd · · Score: 1

      >I can name other rappers that can also defy the current stereotype, but can you?

      Will Smith and the Beastie Boys (to a certain degree) come to mind. I'm admiteddly not a rap fan, so I can't think of others.

      I suppose the new rap stereotype to me is to try to offend as many people as possible in the shortest amount of time, but perhaps the stereotype is all about gangstas and their exploits (although I thought that was subdivided into "gangsta rap"?).

      >I'm going to assume that you meant the above "you" in the general sense, because I believe that I've presented points in a straightforward manner that proves my intelligence.

      Yes, I'm not being personal here. I don't consider anyone intelligent enough to come up with a reasonable argument on slashdot "stupid". :-)

      >Every single person I know who enjoys hip-hop at least respects Eminem rhyming ability, if they don't like his content.

      I would, however, after hearing what Busta Rhymes can do with WPM I'd suggest that Eminems outta his league... :-)

      >I will also respond in advance to your ad hominem attacks against my friends

      Woah there. I had no intention of getting personal with Eminems listening demographic here. However, you'll note that I suggest anyone who can understand his lyrics has the intelligence to not do what he warns about. The problem I see is that preaching to the choir is the job of a pastor, not a rap musician.

      If these people were introduced to Eminem without the preconceptions his videos and printed art bring about then I'd agree. Unfortunately, with the agressive marketing from the RIAA I fear that its unlikely we'd find anyone into the rap scene who has never heard of Eminem so unfortunately the debate of wether he is an actor or a musician continues (IMHO). As it stands, both of us could be right, or both of us could be wrong. Perhaps the test will be to see how long he endures, and see whether or not he is able to shift the stereotype. This will take years, though, so don't expect me to wait.

      Not that I have a problem with people whose main art is acting and not being a musician -- I just suppose that I'd like to see people realise that this can, has, and for the forseeable future, will be true for some artists (Maybe including Eminem, maybe not. Depends on your side of the coin, I suppose).

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    32. Re:Tired Argument Alert by KaiserSoze · · Score: 1

      The entire current crop of rap and hiphop artists are just tired rehashed of the mid-90's crap

      I would agree with your sentiment but not your facts. The vast majority of rap today is crap (personally I don't like No Limit that much at all, nor anything that Ja Rule is doing this week, and Jay-Z is far too egotistical for his rhyming skills), but my point is that Eminem rises above the current crop.

      And as for your observation that you realize how pointless it is to argue with someone so obviously blind to what pop music is, I do know what POP music is, and while some of Mathers' singles do either border POP (The Way I Am) or are POP (The Real Slim Shady), the majority of his songs are true RAP (not even hip-hop IMHO). Do you really think Stan was a pop song? It was played on pop radio true, but I don't recall the last time J Lo or Ms. Aguilera (christ, even Limp Bizkit) performed a song about an obsessive fan who kills his wife and child in order to emulate his hero, let alone a song about the above performed in a tight narrative that weaves between the artist and the fan.

      --

      "What we elect to call imagination is mere combination of things not heretofore combined." - Frank Norris

    33. Re:Tired Argument Alert by KaiserSoze · · Score: 1

      Will Smith and the Beastie Boys (to a certain degree) come to mind. I'm admiteddly not a rap fan, so I can't think of others.

      While Wil Smith is pure pop, you are correct about the Beastie Boys. I was thinking more about Wyclef Jean (first album, and his upcoming release especially), Digable Planets, and others.

      I suppose the new rap stereotype to me is to try to offend as many people as possible in the shortest amount of time, but perhaps the stereotype is all about gangstas and their exploits (although I thought that was subdivided into "gangsta rap"?).

      I believe my point was not well stated in light of your response. In general, I don't like so-called gansta-rap (though not much is even being produced these days), and more importantly, while Eminem does use profane language, his music is definitely not gangsta-rap (even if he is backed by Dre). It would be a long post, so I don't want to discuss the difference (at least my opinion) between sub-genres of rap, but if you like I could try.

      --

      "What we elect to call imagination is mere combination of things not heretofore combined." - Frank Norris

    34. Re:Tired Argument Alert by antibryce · · Score: 2
      Do you really think Stan was a pop song? It was played on pop radio true, but I don't recall the last time J Lo or Ms. Aguilera (christ, even Limp Bizkit) performed a song about an obsessive fan who kills his wife and child in order to emulate his hero, let alone a song about the above performed in a tight narrative that weaves between the artist and the fan.


      Yes, I do think it was a pop song. In my opinion anything he puts out is a pop song, because it is so obviously marketed from the ground up to sell sell sell. The fact that it was played on the radio even shows that the record industry (who pays the radio stations, and tells them what to play) thought it was a pop song.

    35. Re:Tired Argument Alert by antibryce · · Score: 2
      My only point in this thread before it rapidly degraded into people calling me a moron, is that in my opinion as a musician, a friend of quite a few talented and innovative musicians, and a collector of music Eminem is tired hiphop beats with poorly written lyrics which would fall apart without the use of "fuck", "cunt", and "fag." His music is nothing new. It's just a slight merging of shockrock and gangsta rap. So in essense, he's the blending of two tried and true marketing tactics.


      I wouldn't call him a sell out, because I do not know what he started out to attempt, only that all he attempts now is to sell as many albums to suburban white kids* as possible.


      I never said he didn't write his own lyrics, I asked if he wrote the entire songs or just the lyrics. I didn't know, so I thought I'd ask someone who obviously had more knowledge of him than I do. Apparently you misunderstood what I meant when I said "Ok, so did he write the music, or the lyrics?" Perhaps it is you who is babbling and has no reading comprehension.


      Look, it's just a cycle all musical genres go through (and all genres in all art forms, for that matter.) Something becomes popular (hiphop in the late 80's), record execs latch onto it (early 90's) and within 5 years they've drained the pool of any decent artists in said genre. Then they continue to pump out mediocre versions of the original, until something new comes along. The early/mid-90's craze of "alternative" bands is another great area to look to for this. Nirvana hits big, suddenly every band in Seattle with a heroin problem and long hair gets signed to a major. Not that some of them weren't good, but by 97/98 that pool was drained. Now we have the current crop of alternacrap.


      God, I've had this "discussion" so many times in the past few months. It seems everytime the subject comes up some highstrung fan of bad nu-hiphop jumps on my case because I'm stating my opinion (shared by many) that hiphop had it's last original breath of fresh air in the early 90's. I'm not trying to step on your creative toes, or insult you in any way. I'm just saying that musically "that ship has sailed." Not that you can't enjoy it, or millions can't buy new hiphop CDs, just that MUSICALLY the genre is very very tired. All the beats are the same, the subject matter varies VERY slightly, and the bottom line in the whole genre seems to be "write songs about offensive stuff, you'll sell more."


      *: I used to live in a rather large city, and I rarely heard any new hiphop. Now that I live in a suburbs I can't go 20 minutes without a white kid driving by blasting the latest boring hiphop.

    36. Re:Tired Argument Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tenacious D, "City Hall":

      Lots of times, when me and KG are watchin'
      All the f**kin' s**t that goes down at City Hall,
      We get the feeling we should f**k s**t up,
      Yeah, we should f**king start a riot! (A riot!)

      We'd have 'em screamin' in the streets,
      We'd have them tippin' over s**t
      And breakin' f**kin' windows of small businesses!
      And settin' f**kin' fires! x3

      OH NOS!!!1 TERRORISTS!!!1

    37. Re:Tired Argument Alert by c.derby · · Score: 1

      Actually, from what I remember, it's illegal for the record industry to pay for play. I can tell you, however, that the prizes for many of the giveaways and contests in some way come from the music industry.

      --
      -- derby
    38. Re:Tired Argument Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding.
      I'd sooner download viruses than the noise that punk calls 'music'

    39. Re:Tired Argument Alert by KaiserSoze · · Score: 2

      My only point in this thread before it rapidly degraded into people calling me a moron, is that in my opinion... Eminem is tired hiphop beats with poorly written lyrics

      I understand if by now you believe me to be a slope-foreheaded neanderthal, dragging my club from house to house as I rape women, play gangsta-rap from the boombox slung over my shoulder, and attempt to "be cool" in front of the black folks because I'm a white guy that likes rap. However, I will continue to say it: Eminem's lyrics are, in fact, poetry.

      I hate poetry, never liked it in school. I was always more fascinated by prose. Shakespeare in middle school, Vonnegut in high school, Frank Norris and Emile Zola in college, and Rick Bass now. However, while I do not like poetry, I can respect and appreciate it. I see Eminem as the rare artist who, while you may not like, you can at the very least respect his rhyme scheme, and the grammatical constructs of his verse.

      Yeah, its easy as shit to go "Welcome to Atlanta where the players play/And we ride on these thangs like every day". Prosaic verse has watered down hip-hop and rap to mere (as its detractors would say) hip-pop. I've tried to write rap lyrics, and its exceedingly hard to meet my own expectations of quality. Most of today's rap/hip-hop artists do not meet them.

      So, while this has been an interesting debate, and I believe that I've stated as best I can the reasons that Eminem is not trash, I do understand that some people will not ever see his music in the same vein that I do. Later, man.

      --

      "What we elect to call imagination is mere combination of things not heretofore combined." - Frank Norris

    40. Re:Tired Argument Alert by Com2Kid · · Score: 2


      As to your second point, many musicians have, as you so callously put it, "just held a microphone on stage". Are opera singers musicians? Are gospel singers musicans?


      One key difference;

      they can sing.

      eminem can talk fast and add some sort of a beat to it.

      Con-friggin-graduations. Shit. That is the LOWEST FRIGGIN DENOMINATOR of vocal control.

      Sure he may be good at it, but fuck, you ain't gonna call the guy who plays the cowbell a grandmaster, no matter how well he plays it.



      One more thing, I can't see a reason why what Eminem wears has anything to do with his value as a musician. Christ, John Lennon was running around naked on camera, with a naked woman no less. [Flamers please note my sarcasm].



      That he sells music off of his bad boy attitude has a lot to do with it. If he cannot sell music off of solely his MUSICAL talents then well hell, why the heck should I listen to it at all? I want music, not some bad attitude that comes along with the music.


      Finally, if you would like to dismiss Eminem out-of-hand for the content of his songs, then pass Go and collect $200.


      A true artist needs not use shockvalue to make something beautiful. Or horrific. After a certain point horror because beautiful as well, on an artistic level.

      eminem couldn't sing (hell he can't sing at all) about daisies and make it sound nice. A true musician can.


      It's very easy to dismiss artists that put society's collective taboos and psychoses on display.


      Actually he just kinda pulls them out of his ass and waves them all around. To put them on display would mean setting up a proper display case and all, (metaphorically of course) and eminem does not have enough talent to do that.


      Personally, I believe that one can experience a sort of catharsis from albums such as this one, if only when you realize that your life is so much better than the nightmarish hell that Slim Shady/Eminem/Marshall Mathers seems to inhabit.


      Yah how nice, you feel better about yourself because some dickhead whitetrash boy has a shitty life?

      Hell is that was passes for empathy in society these days? Pathetic.

    41. Re:Tired Argument Alert by Com2Kid · · Score: 2

      Eminem freestyles constantly. He got second place in 1997's Rap Olympics, devoted to freestyling (well before he was backed by Dre). He has also been on The Wake Up Show (a radio show devoted to lyricists, very well respected in the underground hip-hop community) countless times, again before he was ever backed by Dre or on a label.

      Wow he can rhyme fast and add some sort of a beat to it.

      If you add a subjective scale to any human performed action you can claim that it requires skill of some kind, and indeed you can even set criteria that says "performing such and such action in such and such way proves that you have such and such skill level."

      It does not make it art though, it just makes it a self gratifying genre of back patting competitions.


      If you want to argue that he's a sell-out, go for it.


      I would, but he has so little to sell out. Definitely no artistic integrity.


      If you want to argue that he's not a real musician because he doesn't play an instrument, go for it.


      Actually I would rather prefer to aim for "has no musical TALENT" myself. . . .

      talent as a rapper? Sure. Talent as a musician? No way.


      (He did do most of the production on his new album, but in the hip-hop world that rarely means actually touching an instrument).


      So uh, the sum of his 'musical' knowledge basically amounts to:

      Knowing the basics of how beats and rhythm works

      Knowing how to use a rhyming dictionary.

      Yah, uh, great. Heh. Real talent there folks. . . .

      Pardon me, I have to stop before my eyes roll out of my head.

    42. Re:Tired Argument Alert by Com2Kid · · Score: 2

      Strip away the personalty of any entertainer, and you're left with a "B-rate" level instance of that form of entertainment.


      May I suggest trying listening to art something instead of entertainment? Worlds of difference.

      "I don't speak/I float in the air trapped in a sheet/I'm not a real person/I'm a ghost trapped in the beat", then I will support him as an artist.


      Juvenile. The level of deep thought that goes into such ramblings is pathetic, I put out crap like that when I am halfassed asleep, and treat it as such, straight into the garbage can. That is not significant or worldly or enlightening at all, and it disgusts me that people would treat such simple minded thoughts as being original. Anybody who has spend the ass end bit of a second pondering the meaning of life has come to far deeper conclusions then that.

      And anybody who hasn't spent that much time on the question shouldn't be commenting on what is or is not art.

      Every single person I know who enjoys hip-hop at least respects Eminem rhyming ability, if they don't like his content.


      So he can rhyme, congrats. Big deal. That DOES NOT make him a musician. Hell I used to do insanely complex rhymes just for the hell of it, gave it up after awhile, got boring. I mean sure A/B/C/A B/C/D/B C/D/E/C D/E/F/D etc is fun for awhile, but it gets rather tiresome fast. :) And then of course when you get even more complex then that. . . .

      ::shudders:: 4+ syllable rhymes suck sooo much. Heh. Didn't help that I limited myself to never rhyming with the same word more then once in a poem.

      Annyways. After a few pages of that (of the A/B/C/A B/C/D/B .... system I have done around 6 pages max so far) it tends to get, as I said, rather tiresome and I just gave up and went to free verse, which I do believe is rather cheating, but hey, it is tons easier. :)

      But yah, rhyming isn't music. It is rhyming. NEXT.


      I will also respond in advance to your ad hominem attacks against my friends by saying that the majority are college graduates, from English and Poli Sci majors, to Comp Sci (like myself) and Engineering graduates. By your own definition (at least in my social circle of approximately 100 people who like rap/hip-hop), Eminem is a musician.


      While I cannot speak for the other person;

      college doesn't make you smart;

      It just certifies that you can bubble in answer sheets and properly regurgitate answers on tests. Congrats. :P

      I used to think that there where Genre's of music, then I learned that if it is real music it doesn't matter what genre it comes from;

      Beauty is beauty. My current litmus test is to listen to a song for ~2 months straight. If I hear deeper things in it with each passing listen, then it is truly beautiful.

      Of course if I cannot stand to listen to it for two months straight. . . . ^_^

    43. Re:Tired Argument Alert by KaiserSoze · · Score: 2

      Yah how nice, you feel better about yourself because some dickhead whitetrash boy has a shitty life? Hell is that was passes for empathy in society these days? Pathetic.

      Actually, rereading your statement now, I see your point about empathy, but I don't feel it makes me less of a person. Just because catharsis comes from bad situations does not make my life shitty. It doesn't make me feel good that Slim Shady wants to kill people and is self-described white trash.

      Look buddy, you made some good points up until that shit. I liked your comment about an artist being able to make horror beautiful. Thats a good point. You also make sense when you say that to put taboos on display you must properly set them up. I just personally think that Eminem succeeds where you define artistry, that's all. It doesn't make me evil, it doesn't make me stupid, and it doesn't make me support his views.

      He can write a rhyme, and he can tell a story. What's shock to one person is passe to another. Do you think my ears bleed every time I hear the word "fuck"?

      You also make a good point that talking into a microphone is the lowest common denominator of voice control. However, I believe rap has always been more about the lyrics than how they're conveyed. If you gave me the lyrics to a good song, I could rap 'em, and that's what a majority of rappers do: talk about shit other people wrote. But not only is Eminem a good written lyricist, he can freestyle (extremely well) spur of the moment rhymes that are hundreds of times more complex than anything lesser artists could take weeks to put together.

      Just my opinion of course. Like I said, you make good points about Art and Music, I just personally think Eminem meets the criteria.

      --

      "What we elect to call imagination is mere combination of things not heretofore combined." - Frank Norris

    44. Re:Tired Argument Alert by Com2Kid · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The AC posted thusly:

      Excellent analysis. Speaking as a high-schooler when his first CD came out, most here on slashdot would be surprised how many "geeks" and how many in the top 5% of their high school class love, and I mean absolutely love his music. Maybe you have to be from a newer generation, but you can definitely read very, very far into not just what he says, but how he's saying it. In my AP English class, virtually every person in it concurred that Eminem, specifially the original "slim shasy" is a truly insightful commentary on society. Take that for what you will.

      Imagine that, someone saying the Eminem is insightful...god, this is never going to get modded up ;)


      And it was replied as such:

      Only considering insightful commentary if you are too damn stupid to have come across those ideas yourself before. Staring out a window for a few hours will net you more creative insight on the human condition then any of his cds will.

      Hmm, was your high school middle class by any chance? That would defintly explain it, the middle class is not exactly known for their depth of thought into matters of human existence (well, except for when it serves them, even then they as a whole tend to consider stating the obvious to be insightful.)

    45. Re:Tired Argument Alert by Com2Kid · · Score: 2

      Actually, rereading your statement now, I see your point about empathy, but I don't feel it makes me less of a person. Just because catharsis comes from bad situations does not make my life shitty. It doesn't make me feel good that Slim Shady wants to kill people and is self-described white trash

      The problem that I have is that he is considered insightful when in fact his lyrics are none such.

      True insight causes an empathetic reaction, it causes you to realize the mistakes you have made in your life and encourages you to do better.

      Now often times indeed these types of songs ARE sad and depressing, and hell even gross descriptions of violence can work out as being insightful if done right;

      but my point is that eminem is NOT insightful, his lyrics are not original content, and that many of us who are seem like we are looking down on him are only acting the way that we are acting because we came to these 'insightful' realizations years before and realized that there was far more in the world beyond such simple messages.

      He can write a rhyme, and he can tell a story. What's shock to one person is passe to another. Do you think my ears bleed every time I hear the word "fuck"?


      I do not even care much about the language (though it has been said, and indeed proven, that a truly good author needs not use a single swear word to communicate the most vile and horrifying messages in the world.)

      He may be able to write lyrics and communicate a story, but that does not make him a musician. That makes him a poet at most, but I would fear to even call him that. That he uses his talents in such low grade ways is disgraceful.

      However, I believe rap has always been more about the lyrics than how they're conveyed.


      A lot of independent movie producers say that their movies are more about the message of the movie then the movies actual quality.

      And while a lot of people bought this at first, eventually people came to realize that hey;

      A crappy movie is a crappy movie no matter who makes it. Of course to some extent an amateurish movie will indeed have a bit of gleam to it if it has a significant message to deliver,

      but trying to make sales off of the sheer amateurishness of an art, and even worse saying that that very amateurishness is what makes the art so special, is false. It is a lie, period. Propagated by people who do not want to admit that when it comes down to it, they just can't sing or write musical scores.

      If you gave me the lyrics to a good song, I could rap 'em, and that's what a majority of rappers do: talk about shit other people wrote. But not only is Eminem a good written lyricist, he can freestyle (extremely well) spur of the moment rhymes that are hundreds of times more complex than anything lesser artists could take weeks to put together.

      But not only is Eminem a good written lyricist, he can freestyle (extremely well) spur of the moment rhymes that are hundreds of times more complex than anything lesser artists could take weeks to put together

      He still can't sing. :P

      If he wants to enter a poetry bash then he can go right ahead, I do fear that there is very little money to be earned there though.

      Of course another problem that rap has is its very self limited simplicity. Complex it may be within its own bounds, but by limiting themselves to their own little tiny niche genre of the arts, rappers are like artists who are stuck forever doing a character study. Sure now and then something great may come out of it, but the point of such self limitations is to be able to bring those skills back into the broader world as a whole. Unfortunately rappers never learn this and instead even learn disdain for those 'other' poetic genres out there.

      Heck sometimes slowing the BPM down can speed things up more then you would believe is possible.

    46. Re:Tired Argument Alert by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      "He's as predictable as Brintney Spears, just marketed to a different audience."

      Only half true....

      Britney's whole image was made up, E at least started how he is.

      Britney has nothing to say - except the occasional love lyric that might be original. Eminem has said some things haven't said in his genre... that is why he is popular.

      Eventually he will implode.

    47. Re:Tired Argument Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate poetry, never liked it in school. I was always more fascinated by prose. Shakespeare in middle school,
      You studied Shakespeare, yet don't consider it poetry? It's iambic pentameters - a fairly distinct rhythm, sometimes also using rhyme. That qualifies as poetry in my book.

    48. Re:Tired Argument Alert by greay · · Score: 1

      I've had the (fortune?) to listen to his new album for the past two weeks at work, and I can say this for certain: your comparison of Jerry Springer vs. Discovery channel is just flat out wrong.

      Eminem's music may not be a serious analysis of a situation, but that's just because very little of it is serious - - you might be surprised to find out that some of it is, though. He actually /sings/ one song to his daughter, and although he can't really sing (he opens the song by saying that) it's actually touching.

      But what I can say about him (this is based solely on his current album, I'm unfamiliar with his prior work) is that he /does/ put "real in-depth thought" into it. A lot of what he says is just to get attention, yes. But just as much of it thoughtful commentary on freedom of speech, on thepublic's varied reaction to him, on music, guns, fatherhood, even relationships.

    49. Re:Tired Argument Alert by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 1

      Actually I'd like to respectfully disagree, perhaps commercial (or popular) hip hop is tired and completely devoid of new ideas, but there are plenty of artists who are in no way scraping the bottom of the barrel.

      Try The Antipop Consortium, or Eyedea and Slug, or Roots Manuva...

      None of these artists are going to make it big time, but they are breaking new ground, or at the very least expanding the boundaries of hiphop, with new beats, ideas, and subject matter.

      I'm not disagreeing with your opinion of radio played hiphop, but as these things go, there's a lot more life out there than what you'll hear coming out of the average wigger's lowriding honda civic.

      --


      He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    50. Re:Tired Argument Alert by greay · · Score: 1

      "music" itself is very limiting. There's all sorts of rules one needs to follow. The regular beat, octaves, ahh. All that other stuff. I'm a painter, not a musician. My point, though, is this: boundaries are /necessary/ in art of any sort. Boundaries are what you push against & help you to grow. Every artist needs to have some sort of boundaries before they sit down to work. It's not necessary to stick with them, of course, and a good artist won't if the art takes them in a different direction.

      Rap is more limiting than, say, "rock", but that's more because rap is better defined. Yes, there are more rules, and yes, it's simpler. That doesn't make less of an art form.

      When it comes down to it, what's so much better about experimenting with a large variety of structures and techniques to create a wide variety of work, than limiting oneself to a small subset of rules and really refining them and pushing them and really understanding them?

    51. Re:Tired Argument Alert by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

      While they've really hit it big as of late, Outkast has always been attractive to me as an interesting, progressive rap group.

      A couple weeks ago I also picked up an album by Blackalicious. Never heard of them before, but if you like A Tribe Called Quest or Guru, they really take that style to a new level. The reviews on Amazon claim that this isn't their best work, but if it is representative then I'm eager to pick up their earlier albums.

      --
      I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    52. Re:Tired Argument Alert by lblack · · Score: 2

      Eminem is talented in the same way as Flava Flav. Unfortunately, Eminem is center-stage and not a foil to a much more talented rhyme animal.

      He's hooky, jokey, controversial, and pretty fond of swearing. His rhymes are tight. By no means does that elevate him above the hundreds of hip-hop artists who aren't doing that because they're too busy trying new things.

      If it weren't for the curiousity of his being white, and furthermore for the controversy stirred up by his sophomoric masturbation-revenge fantasy lyrics, he would be nothing more than a roadside attraction, breaking it down 6th in the lineup to shake the serious out of the crowd.

      l

    53. Re:Tired Argument Alert by Xaoswolf · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Strip away the personalty of any entertainer, and you're left with a "B-rate" level instance of that form of entertainment.

      Not true, some of the members of Gwar started a side project called The David Broche Experience. While it didn't have the blood, guts and make up that create the personalities in the Gwar, it was still a great show.

    54. Re:Tired Argument Alert by dbc001 · · Score: 1

      Anyone who cant respect Eminem's music on *some* level is an intellectual midget. He writes music that, whether or not you actually like it or enjoy listening to it, does have merit and validity. Not only does he write a great pop song ("My Name Is") but he manages to squeeze some great socio-political commentary in there - even if that commentary is somewhat juvenile. He's also managed to challenge the status quo by offending so many while convincing the majority that he should in fact have the right to offend us! (I think a lot of Eminem's stuff is offensive, but I also think that the shock factor is very valuable to American culture).

      -dbc

    55. Re:Tired Argument Alert by 87C751 · · Score: 1
      It is very easy to see if he writes his own songs. Look at the liner notes, and see if M. Mathers appears under the written by credit.
      Which could also mean he bought the full rights to the song from the actual songwriter. Happens all the time.
      --
      Mail? Put "slashdot" in the subject to pass the spam filters.
  21. Re:A good test case for the 'Marketability' of pir by HeroicAutobot · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I agree. An "analyst" even says so in the article:

    The online versions and bootlegging could serve as a marketing vehicle, whetting fans' appetite for the real thing, noted P.J. McNealy, research director for GartnerG2, a division of the Gartner research firm.

    It's also interesting to note that (despite the "rampant piracy") the limited edition of the CD is the #1 selling CD on Amazon.

    Damn those Internet pirates!

    --
    I'm looking for a HEPA media filter for my TV. I'm alergic to reality shows.
  22. hard numbers by Aanallein · · Score: 1
    "We've yet to see hard numbers on what the marketing effects of piracy are," McNealy noted.
    Somebody should clue this guy in to some of the hard numbers that are out there... (Of course that's books, and freely distributing content, not having it pirated, but all we care about is getting things for free, so that doesn't matter, right?)
  23. You CAN buy it today by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was in the mall to pick up some old skool music (Nerf Herder rules!!!), and I saw it on the shelves. I also saw the note that it won't be released until June, but whatever dude.

    1. Re:You CAN buy it today by pnatural · · Score: 2

      I saw a blurb on Big Media Television that said this album was going to hit the shelves on Sunday of this week, instead of the industry-usual Tuesday, precisely because the label wanted to curb the piracy of the album.

    2. Re:You CAN buy it today by MisterBlister · · Score: 1

      The reason you can buy it today is they released it early because they were afraid of the rampant piracy of this CD on the net. Its been available for download for about 2 weeks now. It was supposed to be released in June but they decided to release it on Sunday before everyone and his mother had downloaded it from the net, or at least realized they could...

    3. Re:You CAN buy it today by marxmarv · · Score: 2
      Yep. Buncha kids musta downloaded the MP3s off Napster and burnt it onto CDs. Now we have to implement copy protection to protect the artists.

      -jhp, who could give not a shit whether fat cats and sales reps are employed or not

      --
      /. -- the Free Republic of technology.
    4. Re:You CAN buy it today by GPPL · · Score: 1

      They had to knock the release date up by two weeks after the cd was pirated three weeks before the planned release date.

      --


      Your mother implements multi-vendor protocols without synergy
    5. Re:You CAN buy it today by surfimp · · Score: 1

      Nerf Herder is "old skool"? Shit, I must be getting old.

    6. Re:You CAN buy it today by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 1

      I bought their first album. FWIW, I'm gonna be buying their new album in Auguest, and I'll be seeing them in a show or two in SF. =)

  24. Got it Sunday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went and grabed it Sunday, its really good. It has both the normal cd and a dvd. I have not gotten a chance to view the dvd.

  25. I BOUGHT A COPY AT FYE'S ON THE 24th! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I bought a copy at the Fye Music in Holyoke, MA on the evening of the 24th. When I asked why it was released early, the girl at the counter mumbled something about the Harry Potter DVD and low sales, and that they received a call from the main office to start putting the new Eminem CD's on the shelves.

    I also saw them available in a Fye's in Woodbridge, NJ the next day.

    For some reason, it is only $11.99, compared to the usual ripoff at that store.

  26. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  27. Labels doing the illogical thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eminem's label, Vivendi Universal-owned Interscope, twice moved up the album's release date, citing widespread Internet piracy.

    Maybe there wouldn't be as much piracy if they hadn't postponed the release date repeatedly.

  28. But no _real_ information here by binaryDigit · · Score: 2

    They tell us it was #2, but they give no numbers. Was it 100, 10000, 100000. That seems like the more interesting#. After all, if there weren't any other interesting cd's put out in that time frame, then being #2 might not mean squat. I'm usually not nearly as anti-music industry as many here, but this report smacks of "lies, damn lies, and statistics".

    1. Re:But no _real_ information here by Tommy_S · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. This whole story somehow just has a feel of disinformation about it to me. Particularly now that I've seen postings by several fellow slash dotters saying this CD was in fact available legitimately in record stores days before the "official" release. Also, if this was really due to internet piracy - thats pretty much alwasys done in .mp3 format. Supposing it is true that lots of people have 'traded" all the tracks on this CD over the internet in .mp3 format, how many of those people would have subsequently and already converted all those tracks into .wav files and burned them onto a CD. I'd speculate, not very many.

    2. Re:But no _real_ information here by Sven+Tuerpe · · Score: 2

      The numbers don't matter. To understand why the important information is really only the #2 position, you'll have to understand what they call charts. There are many misconceptions about it. Some think the charts statistically show what music is currently most liked by the people. Others think they show how well a song or an album sells. Teenagers may believe the charts are a service of MTV. They are all terribly wrong. The so-called charts are just a prioritized list of items the music industry would like to sell to you.

      --
      http://erichsieht.wordpress.com/category/english/
    3. Re:But no _real_ information here by grahamm · · Score: 1

      And of those which have, how many of the resultant CDs would have the same "hash key" which CDDB uses to identify CDs?

  29. Good Advertising by Don'tBAWank! · · Score: 0

    When will folx realize that p2p music sharing is GOOD ADVERTISING ???!!!
    The industry doesn't have control, and that's what freaks them out.

  30. NYT by MisterBlister · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The New York Times today (read it in paper, dunno if they have posted it online) had a mini-review of the album and they mentioned they had pushed up the CD release by more than a week because of the wide-scale piracy of the CD on the net. They also mentioned how in LA it has been really "hip" to blast the new album out of your car, since it was a pre-release and all.

    If the album sales are a disappointment, the shit's gonna hit the fan in one way or another...It will be interesting to see what happens.

    1. Re:NYT by kindbud · · Score: 2

      MisterBlister:
      If the album sales are a disappointment, the shit's gonna hit the fan in one way or another...It will be interesting to see what happens.

      Marshall Mathers:
      The rapper said bluntly: "I think that shit is fucking bullshit. Whoever put my shit on the Internet, I want to meet that motherf***er and beat the shit out of him, because I picture this scrawny little dickhead going 'I got Eminem's new CD! I got Eminem's new CD! I'm going to put it on the Internet.' I think that anybody who tries to make excuses for that shit is a fucking bitch."

      So the shit is going to hit the fan because some fucking bitch (or scrawny little dickhead, not sure) put Eminem's shit on the internet?

      And we are supposed to care... because why?

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
  31. Eminem on pre-order? Why am I not surprised? by Anomolous+Cow+Herd · · Score: 0
    I've pre-ordered my copy and am looking forward to hearing it.

    Probably a response typical of the Slashdot audience (since CmdrTaco is almost always representative of the people who post comments here).

    Why am I not surprised? This forum is full of misogynists and homophobes.

    --

    "I don't know that atheists should be considered citizens, nor should they be considered patriots." - George Bush
  32. Re:A good test case for the 'Marketability' of pir by dirk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The two (well, 3) cases are pretty much incomparable. The bootleg versions of AotC and Spidey are much poorer quality than you will see in the theatre. Comparing a compressed DivX version taken from a guy with a camcorder in the theatre (which is the version of AotC that I saw making the rounds on the net) is nothing like seeing it in the theatre for yourself. The Eminem bootleg sounds (for most people) exactly like what they would get from the real thing. For most people, they have already bought their copy of the Cd, and unless there is some "super secret" extra on the official release, there isn't a reason to buy another version. The liner notes are not enough incentive for most people to spend $15 on a cd they already bought without liner notes for $5. But seeing a decent version of AotC is worth $15 even though they already spent $5 on a crappy pirated version that isn't near the quality.

    --

    "Information wants to be expensive" - Stewart Brand, the same guy who said "Information wants to be free"
  33. Actually... by Caine · · Score: 1

    It's a great album. Haven't listened much to him before, but it really got me going. I think I'm even going to buy the album, which is something I don't do often. If it weren't for mp3s, I'd never hear this, and I would make one cd purchase less.

  34. Re:A good test case for the 'Marketability' of pir by yawble · · Score: 4, Insightful
    *near* perfect. Thats the whole issue really. Sure i had a copy of the new Eminem, and yes, i've allready bought the new one. Theres just something about having the actual pressed disk with all of the liner notes and etc that make buying it worthwhile. The main reason that i think people pirate cds so much is because honestly, $15 for 80 mins of music is insane. I remember buying cassette tapes for $5 BRAND SPANKING NEW at the Turtles down the road.

    They increase the price of new music in order to make up for supposed piracy, which in turn makes people more likely to pirate. Its a catch22 of the WORSE kind.

  35. Re:A good test case for the 'Marketability' of pir by BdosError · · Score: 2
    In Spider-Man's and Star Wars's cases, it appears that the piracy either had no effect on the incredible revenue both movies generated, or actually had a marketing effect. People who downloaded the pirate version were *more* likely to go see the in-threater version
    You say that like there's real data. If you have some, by all means enlighten us (and help the cause). Now, I'm confident you're probably right, but that's based on people I know, which aren't necessarily an accurate cross section. Without hard data, it doesn't help the cause, and you're only preaching to the choir.
    "The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data.' " -- Mike Quear, US Congressional staffer
    --
    Complexity is Easy. Simplicity is Hard.
  36. Bought it Sunday..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bought a copy of this Sunday the 26th in Dallas (visiting relatives), comes with
    a DVD of the europe tour (limited edition);
    but did have it before that.
    (RIAA you listening?)

  37. napster napster can't you see? by edrugtrader · · Score: 2

    even without it there's pi-ra-cy...

    --
    MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
  38. Re:Maybe that inflated the stats by RobinH · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does the CDDB track every time the CD is inserted into the CD driver? Perhaps it's just counting every time someone popped the disk in and out, trying to get it to start playing...

    --
    "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
  39. Re:A good test case for the 'Marketability' of pir by neo8750 · · Score: 1
    People who downloaded the pirate version were *more* likely to go see the in-threater version.

    You give a good point but it can't be proven with hardcore evidence. So it can't be used against the RIAA. It is even easier to turn around and say that those people that downloaded the cd and/or copied the cd didn't buy the cd. There by hurting the sale of the cd/movie in question.

    For the record I personally agree with you.

  40. Yes by Zen+Mastuh · · Score: 4, Funny

    Celine Dion fans don't know how to use a computer.

    --
    "What is the sound of one belly slapping?"
    1. Re:Yes by PCM2 · · Score: 2
      Celine Dion fans don't know how to use a computer.
      Errr... you seem to be missing the point, but let's assume you're correct for argument's sake. If (A) Celine Dion fans can't use a computer, and (B) the disc itself is supposed to be unplayable on computers, then how did Gracenote record enough computer users playing the disc to land it at the number 10 spot on Gracenote's chart?
      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  41. eminem on preorder, taco? by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 5, Funny

    Geeze, I'll bet you still have your autographed copy of the "Cool as Ice" video too.

    --

    News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

    1. Re:eminem on preorder, taco? by spezz · · Score: 1
      don't bizust on the tizaco.
      he'll smack your punkazz down with poor grammer and bad spelling faster then you can haXor his Kr4Xor bitchcode.

    2. Re:eminem on preorder, taco? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why don't you dump the zero and get wit the hero?"

      They don't make 'em like that any more... thank goodness.

    3. Re:eminem on preorder, taco? by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 3, Interesting

      [blah blah blah blah pathetic fanboy whining]...even though they have nothing in common besides skin color.

      They also share a production team, a penchant for faked-up bios, and a general M.O.

      See, unlike you, I actually remember the early 90s, and Suge Knight's protege, Dr. Dre, is doing with Mr. Mathers exactly what his mentor did with poor old Robert Van Winkle -- right down to the crappy movie deal that's going to flush his career. I'd feel sorry for him, except that he's probably too cracked out to care. I wonder if Dre had to hold his punk ass upside down from a window to get him to sign?

      Oh, and if you think Mathers writes his own material, I have a bridge to sell you.

      --

      News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

    4. Re:eminem on preorder, taco? by Jack+Hughes · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      But I thought that Eminem was the duo that used to mime to "Girl you know it's true"?

      Now I'm confused.

    5. Re:eminem on preorder, taco? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wondering if you could provide some links/articles/something to back up your claims (mostly the faked-up bio, production team, and ghost writing). I'm not denying them, I just need to see at least one piece of corroborating evidence before I believe a random claim on Slashdot.

    6. Re:eminem on preorder, taco? by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 2

      The faked-up bio and ghost-writing is nothing more than my own intuition based on observing the way the music industry usually generates and dumps manufactured flash-in-the-pan stars. Take it for what it's worth -- I thoroughly expect to be corroborated in a few years, but for now it's obviously just one moron's opinion.

      The production team connection isn't a hidden secret or anything: the story of Suge Knight and Dr. Dre manhandling Vanilla Ice to get him to sign to Death Row records is an industry legend, and one that Van Winkle has confirmed himself. (Scroll down to the "Just Desserts" section of the linked article or search for "Suge Knight" in it.) Dr. Dre left Death Row records when Knight went to jail for racketeering, and Eminem is on Dre's new label.

      --

      News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

  42. Re:Eminem on pre-order? Why am I not surprised? by Skyshadow · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Screw you, you gay-ass bitch. =)

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
  43. it's not theater sales, it's home sales by joeflies · · Score: 1

    I read that lucas doesn't consider piracy a deterent to the box office receipts, rather he is more concerned about the effects that it has on home video sales. I suspect that the cam corder versions aren't going to make a big impact but once the DVD-ripped versions appear, then the point starts to become more poignant.

    However, I'd also like to point out that the subject is far more complicated than it appears. Wilco, for instance, made their entire CD available on the Internet last year, and now the album's out, it's the best selling album they ever had (previous records sold less than 100 thousand copies total, the current record sold 57 thousand in the first week alone and on the top 15)

  44. WAS number 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just checked the Gracenote site and the album was listed as #1.

  45. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  46. stupid white men by Cardhore · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Rap Lyrics:
    I sold bottles of sorrow, then chose poems and novels.
    --Wu-tang Clan

    People use yo' brain to gain.
    --Ice Cube

    A poor single mother on welfare...tell me how ya did it.
    --Tupac Shakur

    i'm trying to change my life, see I don't wanna die a sinner.
    --Master P.




    Non-rap lyrics: "I shot a man in Reno / just to watch him die"
    --Johnnny Cash

    "Earl had to die"
    --The Dixie Chicks

    "...I killed everything in my path / I can't say that I'm sorry for the things that we done"
    --Bruce Springsteen

    (Extracted from Stupid White Men by Michael Moore.)

    1. Re:stupid white men by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Quote from Eminem "[sound effects of someones throat being slit] bleed bitch bleed, bleed bitch bleed, bleed bitch bleeeeed."

    2. Re:stupid white men by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quote from CmdrTaco "Why won't my anus stop bleeding, bleeeeeding, bleeeed bitch bleeeeeding?"

    3. Re:stupid white men by GigsVT · · Score: 0, Flamebait



      From: "Arthur R. McGee"
      Subject: Z: Sexism and Misogyny: Who Takes t (fwd)
      Resent-From: "Rich Winkel"
      Date: Wed, 9 Mar 1994 22:02:20 GMT
      ---------- Forwarded message ----------
      /* Written 7:50 am Mar 4, 1994 by corina@igc.apc.org in igc:zmagazine */
      /* ---------- "Z: Sexism and Misogyny: Who Takes t" ---------- */
      Sexism and Misogyny: Who Takes the Rap?
      Misogyny, gangsta rap, and The Piano
      By bell hooks
      For the past several months white mainstream media has been calling me to hear my views on gangsta rap. Whether major television networks, or small independent radio shows, they seek me out for the black and feminist "take" on the issue. After I have my say, I am never called back, never invited to do the television shows or the radio spots. I suspect they call, confident that when we talk they will hear the hardcore "feminist" trash of gangsta rap. When they encounter instead the hardcore feminist critique of white supremacist capitalist patriarchy, they lose interest.
      To white dominated mass media, the controversy over gangsta rap makes great spectacle. Besides the exploitation of these issues to attract audiences, a central motivation for highlighting gangsta rap continues to be the sensationalist drama of demonizing black youth culture in general and the contributions of young black men in particular. It is a contemporary remake of "Birth of a Nation" only this time we are encouraged to believe it is not just vulnerable white womanhood that risks destruction by black hands but everyone. When I counter this demonization of black males by insisting that gangsta rap does not appear in a cultural vacuum, but, rather, is expressive of the cultural crossing, mixings, and engagement of black youth culture with the values, attitudes, and concerns of the white majority, some folks stop listening.
      The sexist, misogynist, patriarchal ways of thinking and behaving that are glorified in gangsta rap are a reflection of the prevailing values in our society, values created and sustained by white supremacist capitalist patriarchy. As the crudest and most brutal expression of sexism, misogynistic attitudes tend to be portrayed by the dominant culture as an expression of male deviance. In reality they are part of a sexist continuum, necessary for the maintenance of patriarchal social order. While patriarchy and sexism continue to be the political and cultural norm in our society, feminist movement has created a climate where crude expressions of male domination are called into question, especially if they are made by men in power. It is useful to think of misogyny as a field that must be labored in and maintained both to sustain patriarchy but also to serve as an ideological anti- feminist backlash. And what better group to labor on this "plantation" than young black men.
      To see gangsta rap as a reflection of dominant values in our culture rather than as an aberrant "pathological" standpoint does not mean that a rigorous feminist critique of the sexist and misogyny expressed in this music is not needed. Without a doubt black males, young and old, must be held politically accountable for their sexism. Yet this critique must always be contextualized or we risk making it appear that the behaviors this thinking supports and condones,--rape, male violence against women, etc.-- is a black male thing. And this is what is happening. Young black males are forced to take the "heat" for encouraging, via their music, the hatred of and violence against women that is a central core of patriarchy.
      Witness the recent piece by Brent Staples in the "New York Times" titled "The Politics of Gangster Rap: A Music Celebrating Murder and Misogyny." Defining the turf Staples writes: "For those who haven't caught up, gangster rap is that wildly successful music in which all women are `bitches' and `whores' and young men kill each other for sport." No mention of white supremacist capitalist patriarchy in this piece, not a word about the cultural context that would need to exist for young males to be socialized to think differently about gender. Staples assumes that black males are writing their lyrics off in the "jungle," away from the impact of mainstream socialization and desire. At no point in his piece does he ask why huge audiences, especially young white male consumers, are so turned on by this music, by the misogyny and sexism, by the brutality? Where is the anger and rage at females expressed in this music coming from, the glorification of all acts of violence? These are the difficult questions that Staples feels no need to answer.
      One cannot answer them honestly without placing accountability on larger structures of domination and the individuals (often white, usually male but not always) who are hierarchically placed to maintain and perpetuate the values that uphold these exploitative and oppressive systems. That means taking a critical looking at the politics of hedonistic consumerism, the values of the men and women who produce gangsta rap. It would mean considering the seduction of young black males who find that they can make more money producing lyrics that promote violence, sexism, and misogyny than with any other content. How many disenfranchised black males would not surrender to expressing virulent forms of sexism, if they knew the rewards would be unprecedented material power and fame?
      More than anything gangsta rap celebrates the world of the "material, " the dog-eat-dog world where you do what you gotta do to make it. In this world view killing is necessary for survival. Significantly, the logic here is a crude expression of the logic of white supremacist capitalist patriarchy. In his new book "Sexy Dressing, Etc." privileged white male law professor Duncan Kennedy gives what he calls "a set of general characterizations of U. S. culture" explaining that, "It is individual (cowboys), material (gangsters) and philistine." Using this general description of mainstream culture would lead us to place "gangsta rap" not on the margins of what this nation is about, but at the center. Rather than being viewed as a subversion or disruption of the norm we would need to see it as an embodiment of the norm.
      That viewpoint was graphically highlighted in the film "Menace To Society" which dramatized not only young black males killing for sport, but also mass audiences voyeuristically watching and, in many cases, "enjoying" the kill. Significantly, at one point in the movie we see that the young black males have learned their "gangsta" values from watching television and movies--shows where white male gangsters are center stage. This scene undermines any notion of "essentialist" blackness that would have viewers believe the gangsterism these young black males embraced emerged from some unique black cultural experience.
      When I interviewed rap artist Ice Cube for "Spin" magazine last year, he talked about the importance of respecting black women and communication across gender. He spoke against male violence against women, even as he lapsed into a justification for anti- woman rap lyrics by insisting on the madonna/whore split where some females "carry" themselves in a manner that determines how they will be treated. When this interview was published, it was cut to nothing. It was a mass media set-up. Folks (mostly white and male) had thought if the hardcore feminist talked with the hardened black man, sparks would fly; there would be a knock-down drag out spectacle. When Brother Cube and I talked to each other with respect about the political, spiritual, and emotional self- determination of black people, it did not make good copy. Clearly folks at the magazine did not get the darky show they were looking for.
      After this conversation, and talking with rappers and folks who listen to rap, it became clear that while black male sexism is a serious problem in our communities and in black music, some of the more misogynist lyrics were there to stir up controversy and appeal to audiences. Nowhere is this more evident that in Snoop Doggy Dogg's record "Doggystyle". A black male music and cultural critic called me to ask if I had checked this image out; to share that for one of the first times in his music buying life he felt he was seeing an image so offensive in its sexism and misogyny that he did not want to take that image home. That image (complete with doghouse, beware the dog sign, with a naked black female head in a doghouse, naked butt sticking out) was reproduced, "uncritically," in the November 29, 1993 issue of "Time" magazine. The positive music review of this album, written by Christopher John Farley, is titled "Gangsta Rap, Doggystyle" makes no mention of sexism and misogyny, makes no reference to the cover. I wonder if a naked white female body had been inside the doghouse, presumably waiting to be fucked from behind, if "Time" would have reproduced an image of the cover along with their review. When I see the pornographic cartoon that graces the cover of "Doggystyle," I do not think simply about the sexism and misogyny of young black men, I think about the sexist and misogynist politics of the powerful white adult men and women (and folks of color) who helped produce and market this album.
      In her book "Misogynies" Joan Smith shares her sense that while most folks are willing to acknowledge unfair treatment of women, discrimination on the basis of gender, they are usually reluctant to admit that hatred of women is encouraged because it helps maintain the structure of male dominance. Smith suggests: "Misogyny wears many guises, reveals itself in different forms which are dictated by class, wealth, education, race, religion and other factors, but its chief characteristic is its pervasiveness." This point reverberated in my mind when I saw Jane Campion's widely acclaimed film "The Piano" which I saw in the midst of mass media focus on sexism and misogyny in "gangsta rap." I had been told by many friends in the art world that this was "an incredible film, a truly compelling love story etc." Their responses were echoed by numerous positive reviews. No one speaking about this film mentions misogyny and sexism or white supremacist capitalist patriarchy.
      The 19th century world of the white invasion of New Zealand is utterly romanticized in this film (complete with docile happy darkies--Maori natives--who appear to have not a care in the world). And when the film suggests they care about white colonizers digging up the graves of their dead ancestors, it is the sympathetic poor white male who comes to the rescue. Just as the conquest of natives and lands is glamorized in this film, so is the conquest of femininity, personified by white womanhood, by the pale speechless corpse-like Scotswoman, Ada, who journeys into this dark wilderness because her father has arranged for her to marry the white colonizer Stewart. Although mute, Ada expresses her artistic ability, the intensity of her vision and feelings through piano playing. This passion attracts Baines, the illiterate white settler who wears the facial tattoos of the Maori--an act of appropriation that makes him (like the traditional figure of Tarzan) appear both dangerous and romantic. He is Norman Mailer's "white negro," seducing Ada by promising to return the piano that Steward has exchanged with him for land. The film leads us to believe that Ada's passionate piano playing has been a substitution for repressed eroticism. When she learns to let herself go sexually, she ceases to need the piano. We watch the passionate climax of Baines seduction as she willingly seeks him sexually. And we watch her husband Stewart in the role of voyeur, standing with dog outside the cabin where they fuck, voyeuristically consuming their pleasure. Rather than being turned off by her love for Baines, it appears to excite Stewart's passion; he longs to possess her all the more. Unable to win her back from Baines, he expresses his rage, rooted in misogyny and sexism, by physically attacking her and chopping off her finger with an ax. This act of male violence takes place with Ada's daughter, Flora, as a witness. Though traumatized by the violence she witnesses, she is still about to follow the white male patriarch's orders and take the bloody finger to Baines, along with the message that each time he sees Ada she will suffer physical mutilation.
      Violence against land, natives, and women in this film, unlike that of gangsta rap, is portrayed uncritically, as though it is "natural," the inevitable climax of conflicting passions. The outcome of this violence is positive. Ultimately, the film suggests Stewart's rage was only an expression of irrational sexual jealousy, that he comes to his senses and is able to see "reason." In keeping with male exchange of women, he gives Ada and Flora to Baines. They leave the wilderness. On the voyage home Ada demands that her piano be thrown overboard because it is "soiled," tainted with horrible memories. Surrendering it she lets go of her longing to display passion through artistic expression. A nuclear family now, Baines, Ada, and Flora resettle and live happily-ever-after. Suddenly, patriarchal order is restored. Ada becomes a modest wife, wearing a veil over her mouth so that no one will see her lips struggling to speak words. Flora has no memory of trauma and is a happy child turning somersaults. Baines is in charge, even making Ada a new finger.
      "The Piano "seduces and excites audiences with its uncritical portrayal of sexism and misogyny. Reviewers and audiences alike seem to assume that Campion's gender, as well as her breaking of traditional boundaries that inhibit the advancement of women in film, indicate that her work expresses a feminist standpoint. And, indeed, she does employ feminist "tropes," even as her work betrays feminist visions of female actualization, celebrates and eroticizes male domination. In Smith's discussion of misogyny she emphasizes that woman-hating is not solely the province of men: "We are all exposed to the prevailing ideology of our culture, and some women learn early on that they can prosper by aping the misogyny of men; these are the women who win provisional favor by denigrating other women, by playing on male prejudices, and by acting the `man's woman'." Since this is not a documentary film that needs to remain faithful to the ethos of its historical setting, why is it that Campion does not resolve Ada's conflicts by providing us with an imaginary landscape where a woman can express passionate artistic commitment and find fulfillment in a passionate relationship? This would be no more far-fetched than her cinematic portrayal of Ada's miraculous transformation from muteness into speech. Ultimately, Campion's "The Piano" advances the sexist assumption that heterosexual women will give up artistic practice to find "true love." That "positive" surrender is encouraged by the "romantic" portrayal of sexism and misogyny.
      While I do not think that young black male rappers have been rushing in droves to see "The Piano", there is a bond between those folks involved with high culture who celebrate and condone the sexist ideas and values upheld in this film and those who celebrate and condone "gangsta rap." Certainly Kennedy's description of the United States as a "cowboy, gangster, philistine" culture would also accurately describe the culture evoked in "The Piano". Popular movies that are seen by young black males, for example "Indecent Proposal, MadDog and Glory, True Romance", and "One False Move", all eroticize male domination expressed via the exchange of women, as well as the subjugation of other men, through brutal violence.
      Contrary to a racist white imagination which assumes that most young black males, especially those who are poor, live in a self- created cultural vacuum, uninfluenced by mainstream, cultural values, it is the application of those values, largely learned through passive uncritical consumption of mass media, that is revealed in "gangsta rap." Brent Staples is willing to challenge the notion that "urban primitivism is romantic" when it suggests that black males become "real men" by displaying the will to do violence, yet he remains resolutely silent about that world of privileged white culture that has historically romanticized primitivism, and eroticized male violence. Contemporary films like "Reservoir Dogs" and "The Bad Lieutenant" celebrate urban primitivism and many less well done films ("Trespass, Rising Sun") create and/or exploit the cultural demand for depictions of hardcore blacks who are willing to kill for sport.
      To take "gangsta rap" to task for its sexism and misogyny while critically accepting and perpetuating those expressions of that ideology which reflect bourgeois standards (no rawness, no vulgarity) is not to call for a transformation of the culture of patriarchy. Ironically, many black male ministers, themselves sexist and misogynist, are leading the attacks against gangsta rap. Like the mainstream world that supports white supremacist capitalist patriarchy, they are most concerned with calling attention to the vulgar obscene portrayals of women to advance the cause of censorship. For them, rethinking and challenging sexism, both in the dominant culture and in black life, is not the issue.
      Mainstream white culture is not concerned about black male sexism and misogyny, particularly when it is unleashed against black women and children. It is concerned when young white consumers utilize black popular culture to disrupt bourgeois values. Whether it be the young white boy who expresses his rage at his mother by aping black male vernacular speech (a true story) or the masses of young white males (and middle class men of color) seeking to throw off the constraints of bourgeois bondage who actively assert in their domestic households via acts of aggression their rejection of the call to be "civilized. " These are the audiences who feel such a desperate need for gangsta rap. It is much easier to attack gangsta rap than to confront the culture that produces that need.
      Gangsta rap is part of the anti-feminist backlash that is the rage right now. When young black males labor in the plantations of misogyny and sexism to produce gangsta rap, their right to speak this violence and be materially rewarded is extended to them by white supremacist capitalist patriarchy. Far from being an expression of their "manhood," it is an expression of their own subjugation and humiliation by more powerful, less visible forces of patriarchal gangsterism. They give voice to the brutal raw anger and rage against women that it is taboo for "civilized" adult men to speak. No wonder then that they have the task of tutoring the young, teaching them to eroticize and enjoy the brutal expressions of that rage (teaching them language and acts) before they learn to cloak it in middle-class decorum or Robert Bly style reclaimings of lost manhood. The tragedy for young black males is that they are so easily dunned by a vision of manhood that can only lead to their destruction.
      Feminist critiques of the sexism and misogyny in gangsta rap, and in all aspects of popular culture, must continue to be bold and fierce. Black females must not be duped into supporting shit that hurts us under the guise of standing beside our men. If black men are betraying us through acts of male violence, we save ourselves and the race by resisting. Yet, our feminist critiques of black male sexism fail as meaningful political intervention if they seek to demonize black males, and do not recognize that our revolutionary work is to transform white supremacist capitalist patriarchy in the multiple areas of our lives where it is made manifest, whether in gangsta rap, the black church, or the Clinton administration.
      END ZMAGAZINE FEBRUARY 1994
      Art McGee [amcgee@netcom.com]

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:stupid white men by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit, you did the unthinkable. You found something Michael Moore is not 100% dead wrong about! Of course, he's arguing against straw men from the early 90s, but we'll take what we can, eh?

    5. Re:stupid white men by GafTheHorseInTears · · Score: 0, Funny
      Stupid White Man by Michael Moore

      That's his autobiography, right?

      --
      "You're just scared like a little white pussy. I'll fuck you till you love me, you faggot!"
    6. Re:stupid white men by Japanese+Fuckslut · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Using anecdotal evidence to try to prove a point? Michael Moore should know better.

      Serial killers have said sweet things. But finding a love letter written by a serial killer doesn't mean he's any better of a person. Statistical evidence shows that rap is on average more misogynist, homophobic, and violent than country music. I prefer listening to rap myself (and I don't really care about the objectionable content), but if you're going to attack the moralists, don't try to tackle the statistical basis for their claims by citing the exceptions that prove the rule.

      Using that same type of argument, I could "disprove" global warming by pointing out locations that have gotten cooler throughout the 20th century. But I suspect Mr. Moore would throw a hissy-fit about someone else ignoring trends and citing anecdotes.

      It sure sells books though.

      --

      Two cock in my pussy! It feel so good!
  47. It was released yesterday... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Here in the UK, it was released yesterday, which is probably why it's at number 2, because when you own a PC, and buy a new CD, the first thing you do is whack it in your CD-ROM and rip it.

    Look, it's even on Amazon.co.uk, for £9.99...

    Is this news? No. Please check your local record store before submitting stories like this in future.

  48. Re:A good test case for the 'Marketability' of pir by quantaman · · Score: 2

    As too paying close attention to the figures I would like to see the studies showing that
    People who downloaded the pirate version were *more* likely to go see the in-threater version.

    Not to deny that but keep in mind that the people who go out of their way to download a pirated copy probably like that stuff already. There is a HUGE portion of the population who are not going to see AOTC of Spider-Man no matter what you do and that includes not downloading the pirate version. The people who download are much more likely to have paid for the ticket too see it anyways. I could come out with a study that says people who run on their own are much more likely to lead a healthy life style in other areas. While running does raise your energy to allow you to do other things people who lead a healthy lifestyle also go run as a part of that lifestyle.

    In other words if I'm a person who would download the pirate version am I more likely to see the in-theater version? Yes.

    If I download the pirate version am I more likely to see the in-theater version? Maybe, but we can't tell from a fact like the one you presented.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  49. This is quite common now. by ZaBu911 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Being the broke, selfish, 14-year-old nerd that I am, I downloaded the new KoRn cd, "Untouchables", slated to be released in June, 2 MONTHS ago and gave copies to all of my friends.

    Sure, when I muster the cash, I'll buy the real copy. But I'll be pissed as hell at KoRn if I bought the real copy without trying it out, say in the instance that I'd only been allowed to hear the one single on the radio. Then I'd never buy any more KoRn cds.

    Before now, only the h4rdc0r3 IRC people could find the new albums ahead of time. But now, everyone can. Heck, the person I least expected to (typical dumb blonde pretty girl) gave me my copy of The Eminem Show. Wow. What a change.

    I know that none of you condone piracy. Perhaps you'll even mod me down for this comment. But remember, at least I have the balls to admit that what I'm doing is wrong. -shrug-

    1. Re:This is quite common now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      14-year-old "pubeless" nerd that you are, shut up!

    2. Re:This is quite common now. by radrich449 · · Score: 1

      You think the fact that "having the balls to admit that what I'm doing is wrong" makes you better? When it comes to downloading media, there are three types of people:

      1) those who consider it wrong, and dont do it

      2) those who feel they have a fair use right to listen to music even if they didnt buy it

      3) those who consider downloading media stealing, and do it anyway

      the first two groups are likely to buy music that they like, since they realize that artists need to be supported, and fair use only gives us so many rights. The third group, however, is the group that gives everyone else a bad name. They tend to say things like "why buy music, when I can get it for free," or other stupid things. The fact that their actions are destroying fair use for the rest of us doesnt even affect them. Bottom Line: If you know something is wrong, you shouldnt do it. Period.

    3. Re:This is quite common now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So that would be Aristotle's Magnanimous, Brutal, and Incontinent Man, respectively?

  50. Coming from Gracenote website... by JFMulder · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you ask to receive their Top20 each week, you will read this :

    Get the Digital Top 20 emailed to your mailbox every Tuesday! Be the first to know who's gone up, who's gone down and who's at #1.

    Click here if you want TEXT email (recommended for Outlook email users)
    Click here if you want HTML email (recommended for NON-Outlook email users)

    !!!!!!!!!
    Does this mean that Gracenote could be infected with the Klez virus or something else, so oulook users should receive text messages, just in case? :-)

    1. Re:Coming from Gracenote website... by SanLouBlues · · Score: 2

      Or they've got a geek with a sense of humour who writes html that only renders with gecko instead of iexplore . . .

    2. Re:Coming from Gracenote website... by JFMulder · · Score: 4, Funny

      Insightfull? INSIGHTFULL???? Damn!!! I was trying to be goddamn funny!!!!!
      Moderators, when will they ever learn!!!

  51. Re:had it for a week or two by Script0r · · Score: 1

    I myself had downloaded the "without me" song from kazaa and thought it was great. I also tried to download several other songs from the new album off of kazaa but all that they contained were the looping chorus. They didn't have any rap solos. I figure that eminem probably released these on purpose to get people interested in his new stuff and then he released the cd early to give them a chance to hear the real stuff. Whatever the reason, it worked. I went out and bought the cd on sunday.

  52. Wow... cmdrtaco is such a tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Star Wars freak and Eminem fan.

    Good thing he's engaged because after this revelation, I don't think he could pay enough to have a girl be around him....

  53. Re:A good test case for the 'Marketability' of pir by HydroCarbon10 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The bootleg versions of AotC and Spidey are much poorer quality than you will see in the theatre.

    Assuming, of course, that the theatre it is seen in is run by competent people. Although I didn't see the divx of either film, the quality of any motion picture in the only remaining theatre in my town is comparable to the divx movies I have seen -- only the sound is a bit louder (most of the time). I suppose that's what happens when a certain large theatre operator drops ticket prices to $2 just long enough to run all the competition out of business, and then jacks the prices back up. We're doing good here if the picture is centered on the screen. If it's on the screen AND in focus on the first try, well, it's time to go buy some lottery tickets.

    [/end rant]

    --
    The best way to accelerate a windows box is at 9.8 meters per second square.
  54. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  55. yes but... by PhilJackson · · Score: 1

    ...im so fed up of hearing about the bloody World Cup.

  56. RIAA Sales Models Need To Change by Jason_Knx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This goes to show just how much the RIAA needs to change it's sales models. They're still depending on air play to hype up people to purchasing a album. But no one wants to wait the weeks or months for them to release them. So those pirating are making out like bandits on the people who want it now.

    Just having the assumption that they can eliminate piracy and continue using the same sales tactics isn't going to show the improvement of CD sales they're looking for. They should be releasing the albums for sale at the same time tracks are released for airplay. Then impulse buyers can run out and get the CDs immediately. If buyers have to wait for the overly far away release dates they will look to other means of getting what they want.

    I think the same really applies to most media nowadays. Movies should be released for purchase sooner, TV shows should be released when their seasons finish, and so on. The public are tired of having to wait for what they want. Once it's been released and aired you should be able to purchase it then. You'll then have the choice of a possibly inferior in someway pirated copy or the real thing.

    I wonder if the promotional versions of that radio stations and others recieve were somewhat different, say fewer tracks, for the public releases what will these pre-released bootleg versions be? Promotional releases are controlled so they should monitor that.

    However now they'll just focus on the piracy issue and the public will suffer from it.

    1. Re:RIAA Sales Models Need To Change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we really be sure that gracenote isn't part of the hype? Is the gracenote finding a truly objective count or is there a possibility that it was somehow rigged by (insert your fav industry baddie here)?

  57. Re:But this will actually boost record sales, righ by gripdamage · · Score: 1

    Just to clarify, this isn't a case of people sampling the record before buying. These are people with pirated physical copies of the entire CD, which are identical in content to what you would buy in the record store. The line between fair use and stealing has clearly been crossed by a whole lot of people. I hate the RIAA like any good /er would. I hate their price fixing. I hate their market manipulations which result in unlistenable radio stations. But I can't support stealing.

  58. I bought it last Sunday. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was on the shelf of a big discount retailer. I don't know when it was supposed to be released. I suspect it's a merchandising technique being tried out-- after all, if you think that you're getting something before anyone else is, you're more likely to buy it now.

  59. i'm sorry mama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i never meant to hurt you
    i never meant to make you cry
    but tonight i'm cleaning out my closet

    - eminem lyric troll, finally i can post some lyrics!!!

  60. Taco's strawman argument by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 3, Informative

    Thank god they shut down napster and stopped piracy.

    The CD-Rs were most likely burned from mp3s downloaded from P2P networks. Besides, 10s of thousands of CDs distributed mostly in urban U.S. cities is hardly comparable to the millions that were downloaded across the globe on napster.

    Besides, Taco, you almost sound like you condone music piracy. Aren't you the one who said "I wish people wouldn't steal"?

    Whoever put my shit on the Internet, I want to meet that motherfucker and beat the shit out of him... - Eminem ( quote)
    1. Re:Taco's strawman argument by FFFish · · Score: 1, Troll

      Whoever put my shit on the Internet, I want to meet that motherfucker and beat the shit out of him... - Eminem

      Oh, whinge on Eminemenem, you poofter wanna-be-bad whitebread whiteboy. What a tiresome little twerp. Shame his momma didn't bitchslap him when he was a brat: it'd have done him some good.

      Eninem is low-quality noise for low-quality listeners.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    2. Re:Taco's strawman argument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and dickhead...

    3. Re:Taco's strawman argument by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      Eninem is low-quality noise for low-quality listeners.

      Yeah, it's not upscale and meaningful like the shit we read on slashdot.

      At least Eminem has the honesty to admit that his music is shit.

      I'm so sick and tired of bein admired that I wish that I would just die or get fired and dropped from my label and stop with the fables I'm not gonna be able to top on "My Name is.." And pigeon-holed into some pop-py sensation to cop me rotation at rock'n'roll stations
    4. Re:Taco's strawman argument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      absolutely right on, not only that, but his pussy skinny wannabe ass couldnt "beat the shit" out of my granmda, much less whatever pasty geek put his "shit" on the internet. total poser with nothing original to say (and yet people so admire the young artiste whom is a "mirror" of society, uh, yeah, jackasses.)

    5. Re:Taco's strawman argument by damiam · · Score: 1

      His mom did bitchslap him, that's his entire problem.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    6. Re:Taco's strawman argument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Whoever put my shit on the Internet, I want to meet that motherfucker and beat the shit out of him... - Eminem

      Good. So all I have to do to piss him off to the point of murder (and therefore lock him and his horribly shitty music up for good) is spread his shit about the internet?

      Small price to pay considering how easy bits are to clean up.

    7. Re:Taco's strawman argument by Bnonn · · Score: 1
      • Whoever put my shit on the Internet, I want to meet that motherfucker and beat the shit out of him... - Eminem
      Do these sound like the words of an intelligent or balanced individual? I don't understand why this guy is so popular when he is apparently:
      1. arrogant
      2. conceited
      3. rude
      4. disrespectful
      5. racist
      6. homophobic
      If anything, he reminds me of a Slashdot troll. What does it say about our society that people who exhibit these qualities, and must use three expletives in single sentence, are held up as some kind of idols? And what does it say about the intelligence levels of people who find his lyrics appealing?
    8. Re:Taco's strawman argument by shepd · · Score: 1

      >and yet people so admire the young artiste whom is a "mirror" of society

      Funny, isn't it, how a mirror presents an exact copy of something and never produces any thing new?

      Funny, isn't it, how a pirated copy attempts to present an exact copy of something and never produces anything new?

      Funny, isn't it, how alike Eminem and piracy are?

      Now, for the kicker, funny isn't it how similar Eminem's self-loathing in his music is to his self-loathing of piracy as a mirror of society?

      Anyone who enjoys Eminem should rest on that for a while. And once you're done with that consider how he flip-flops on his opninions about things like a politician. A strange mirror to tell the truth, if he ever was one.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    9. Re:Taco's strawman argument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new slashdotsucks.com sucks, I liked the old one (the "Adequacy" one) better. Bring it back!!!

    10. Re:Taco's strawman argument by FFFish · · Score: 2

      At least Eminem has the honesty to admit that his music is shit.

      And in BC, David Trott admitted that he murdered a nine year-old girl. I suppose we all should all look charitably upon him and excuse his behaviour, just as you do for Eminem.

      Not.

      Eminem is a wanking little shit who's being managed by people who are smart enough to know how to manipulate self-pitying angry young white boys who think they need to rebel against the humdrum safety and comfort of their middle-class lives.

      The entire Eminem scheme is disgusting, from the singer to the creeps that manage him, to the brain-dead wannabes who think they're so cynical and rebelious, yet have deep-throated the codswallop.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    11. Re:Taco's strawman argument by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      And in BC, David Trott admitted that he murdered a nine year-old girl. I suppose we all should all look charitably upon him and excuse his behaviour, just as you do for Eminem.

      It's morally wrong to murder. It's not morally wrong to write shit music.

      Eminem is a wanking little shit who's being managed by people who are smart enough to know how to manipulate self-pitying angry young white boys who think they need to rebel against the humdrum safety and comfort of their middle-class lives.

      Agreed.

      The entire Eminem scheme is disgusting, from the singer to the creeps that manage him, to the brain-dead wannabes who think they're so cynical and rebelious, yet have deep-throated the codswallop.

      Agreed.

    12. Re:Taco's strawman argument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, that's probably the most intelligent and insightfull comment I've read on Slashdot in a long time. Too bad about the comment on Indian music though.....

    13. Re:Taco's strawman argument by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Too bad about the comment on Indian music though.....

      I just clarified that I'm not trying to insult it. I'm sorry it came across in that manner.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    14. Re:Taco's strawman argument by Coy0t3 · · Score: 1

      Again, I'm sorry (should have hit refresh and read all the threads again). I'm just a little drunk on a Tuesday night and having fun on Slashdot. My bad....

      --
      Maybe you'll return to Minagua, You could go unnoticed in such a place. -FZ
    15. Re:Taco's strawman argument by Zebbers · · Score: 1

      jealousy...........sweet sweet jealousy.

      And what do YOU listen to mr. high and mighty?

      Im sure it must be so intellectually stimulating, eh?

    16. Re:Taco's strawman argument by GoatPigSheep · · Score: 1

      Whoever put my shit on the Internet, I want to meet that motherfucker and beat the shit out of him...

      Eminem has an intelligent answer to everything

      --
      GoatPigSheep, the 3 most important food groups
    17. Re:Taco's strawman argument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not like a CD that was made from mp3's will be recognised by CDDB. The TOC needs to be about exactly the same for it to work.

    18. Re:Taco's strawman argument by 87C751 · · Score: 1
      It's morally wrong to murder. It's not morally wrong to write shit music.
      It is morally wrong to write shit music, but it's only a venal sin. Now, performance might elevate it to the status of mortal sin...
      --
      Mail? Put "slashdot" in the subject to pass the spam filters.
    19. Re:Taco's strawman argument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. arrogant
      2. conceited
      3. rude
      4. disrespectful

      I don't know anyone like that.

      5. racist

      Can you back this one up at all?

      6. homophobic

      Conceded.

    20. Re:Taco's strawman argument by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Are you dumb enough to think that society should only look up to those who are noble in both thought and action?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    21. Re:Taco's strawman argument by taernim · · Score: 1

      ... Do I really need to be the one to step forward and say "Uh... Taco was being sarcastic."

      He wasn't saying he condones or doesn't condone piracy. He was making a joke that shutting down napster did nothing to affect music piracy.

      --
      "PC Load Letter? What the $@#% does that mean?!"
  61. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  62. Barnes and Nobles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was selling it as of Sunday. At least in southern Maine. It seems some places were selling it for some reason, so that probably explains it.

  63. Zwan by Jugomugo · · Score: 1

    I have still to hear them, but they gotta rock hard! I friend of mine went to the Q101 show in Chicago and said they were the shit.

    --
    "In a cat's eye, all things belong to cats."
    1. Re:Zwan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who is they? eminem, the royal "they"?

  64. Re:A good test case for the 'Marketability' of pir by mumblestheclown · · Score: 1

    If piracy were good for sales, companies would quickly figure it out and actively encourage it. Darwinian marketing, survival of the fittest, every little edge--that whole bit. Look--you can accuse the music makers of a lot of things, but inattention to market and lack desire to squeeze every last penny out of the consumer are not in that list! The problem is that except in isolated, questionable instances intended generally as somebody's defense of stealing, piracy doesn't help sales. Stop deluding yourself.

  65. white america!! by billybob · · Score: 1

    Totally off topic, but god damn if "white america" aint em's best song of all time. I've listened to it probably like 100 times in the last 2 weeks, I cant get it out of my head. the message and the "anger" just make me wanna fuck shit up! :D

    --
    Joseph?
    1. Re:white america!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are gay.

    2. Re:white america!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hell yeah, that song rox... even better if you're racist like me, WHITE POWER, DOWN WITH NIGGAZ

    3. Re:white america!! by billybob · · Score: 1

      :(

      --
      Joseph?
    4. Re:white america!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gotta be a troll. No self-respecting white supremacist would be caught dead spelling "you're" correctly.

    5. Re:white america!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny, I've listened to "Everybody Here Wants You" (Jeff Buckley, RIP) about a hundred times in the past week and it just makes me wanna fuck....

    6. Re:white america!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      white america! i could be one of your kids... white america! little eric looks just like this... white america! erika loves my shit, i go to TRL, look how many hugs i get.

  66. Will the Real Slim Shady please drop the soap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you remember the terms of your plea bargain, you have another year. Beat the shit out of me or anyone one else for that matter you go to jail for the original 5 year possible sentence. That's part of pleas bargain.

  67. cause i'm a soldier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    these shoulders hold up so much, they wont budge
    ill never fall or fold up
    even if my collar bones crush or crumble i will never submit or stumble

    - the eminem lyric troll, FINALLY a purpose for me to live, thank you taco for liking eminem!

  68. sucker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eminim is a little stupid kid who's a bit late with finishin puberty.

  69. nerf herder sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Nerf Herder sucks. Weezer sucks. Nerd Rock pretty much sucks. Why would you want to hear about some nerd's boring life? They don't even sing about nerd stuff like Linux that I would want to hear about. They sing about girls that dump them!!! That's so BORING! :)

  70. Re:But this will actually boost record sales, righ by man_ls · · Score: 2

    Read both CDs out in digital and do a bit-compare of them. You'll find that they are, indeed, extremely differet, because of the MP3 conversion process.

    From a technical standpoint, the record legally available for purchase and the downloaded thing are nothing alike.

  71. Re:WH0RE WHORE A WH0RE WHORE A WH0RE WHORE A WH0RE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dude, i think they have medications for people like you; consult your physician

  72. It is number one now... by stain+ain · · Score: 5, Informative

    I just checked on gracenote's site.
    "The Eminem show" is now on top, number 1, the most-played this week.

    1. Re:It is number one now... by Cardhore · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How the fuck is that offtopic? Fucking moderators today.

  73. There is another issue here: by rcs1000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And the issue is the futility of piracy protection. It only takes one person to rip an MP3 and list it on (say) Audiogalaxy, and the success of the protection is null and void.

    The Eminem album is a classic example: it isn't available (ie, people can't rip it) and yet the MP3s are doing the rounds. It just takes one person with a loopback cable and... poof... your copy protection is gone.

    The irony is - of course - that copy protection might *harm* sales. If I know I cannot rip a CD and put it on my iPod, I might not bother buying it.

    Those people that would never buy and would always find a pirate copy will anyway.

    So, that's media industry logic for you...

    --
    --- My dad's political betting
    1. Re:There is another issue here: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eewwwwww

      You have a MAC!?!?!@?!??!??!?! Evrreeone knos that MAVC's Suck!!!!!!! GO to hel!

    2. Re:There is another issue here: by Reziac · · Score: 2

      You bring up a good point, which I'll further illustrate:

      If I download some MP3s and like them, I then buy the CD *as the best possible BACKUP to my MP3s.*

      The assumption here is that if I lose the MP3 files, I can always rip them again from the CD.

      But if the CD isn't rippable -- why would I want to buy it *as a backup to my MP3s* if it can't be used for that purpose?? Obviously, it would be a pointless purchase (especially since I don't even own an audio CD player). Might as well just download 'em again instead.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:There is another issue here: by signifying+nothing · · Score: 1
      I think record companies know that anti-piracy measures won't themselves stop piracy. But, if the publisher makes an attempt to prevent copying (however half-assed) then circumventing that copy-protection becomes an offence under the DMCA, even if it would *otherwise* be considered fair use.

      So, by having this copy-protection measure in place, they can prove that any MP3 of that track must be illegal. That makes it a lot easier to go after 'pirates' than if they had to prove intent to redistribute in every case.

  74. evil teen h4x0rs on the P2P networks by woboz · · Score: 1

    just another example for the RIAA to bring up in their arguments for better copyright protection devices. But wait this CD was on the net before it was released. It couldn't have been evil teen h4x0rs. It must have been someone within the recording industry illegally releasing the CD. No amount of copyright protection device will stop internal deffects. They need to examine the skeletons in their own closets before they start cracking down on the general public.

    1. Re:evil teen h4x0rs on the P2P networks by penguin_punk · · Score: 0

      All it really takes is one executive bringing home a copy fo rhis little girl to listen to. She tells a friend who teaches her how ot rip it and send it to him who then throw it on his site while telling his buddies on irc and msn where to get it.

      They do the same, and within an _hour_, there are 200 nodes on a p2p network with the EXACT same copy of the new album.

      Meanwhile, the exec gets out of the shower, takes a shit, and realizes that he forgot to tell his little girl NOT to tell anybody about the cd. Too late. By the time he walks downstairs, there are now 2000 copies floating around.

      I'm not in the music industry, but when they say that 'security was high' regarding the release of the new album, how many people actually have access to it? 20? 50? 100? Remember, all it takes is _one_ as illustrated above. If you think that scenario is Fiction, think about MSN/ICQ contact lists, and small irc channels.

      Blah. mod -4 for ranting.

      --
      HURD - Hurd's Under Research & Development
    2. Re:evil teen h4x0rs on the P2P networks by dpu · · Score: 1

      i work in the recording industry, and the above post is only slightly exaggerated. in a "high security" situation, only about 5 people have access to the master copy - the engineer and assistant, the producer, the band/artist representative, and the record company representative (this number quickly goes up accounting for aides, multiple reps, and other assistants - 5 is pretty much a minimum number). in most cases of pre-release piracy, it would be either the producer (or an assistant) or the engineer (or assistant) who has access to the final copy of the album. all it takes is 1 button pressed on the burner with a blank cd in it to create an illegal copy. these people all have keys to the studio and could do it anytime they wanted. then there's the anonymous phone calls offering $15000US and up for copies of the album :) hard to turn that kind of money down for an hour's work, and i've seen it happen a few times.

      --
      Dammit, I meant to post that anonymously!
  75. It is already out! by Jauz · · Score: 1

    The CD doesn't need to be pre-order....it's already been released!

  76. It's entirely likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that these are burned CD's of the original. I mean, think about how many people listen to Eminem... like everyone. And think about how many of those people have access to CD burners...probably 99%.

  77. Eminem Time Machine by lsd4all · · Score: 1

    TIME MACHINE DATE : 05/20/2002 9:34 am

    Just got the pre-release of The Eminem Show off thew web.

    TIME MACHINE DATE : 05/20/2002 9:37 am

    Just deleted the pre-release of The Eminem Show off drive C.

  78. I guess this is a good thing by CathedralRulz · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    See, normally I am a complete opponent of piracy. But I strongly dislike Eminem. So I really am not bothered by people stealing from him, as he fosters an attitude of disrespect for the law I can't help but enjoy the irony of him suffering because of it.

    1. Re:I guess this is a good thing by CathedralRulz · · Score: 1

      I guess another faggot fan saw my post. What a total abuse of moderation power.

  79. Re:Anybody notice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only the UK version is copy protected. Pay attention next time, ok?

  80. The story could have been sexier by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1, Troll

    after all, the dude's name way Hymen, someone was getting "fscked" (Eminem, I suppose) only thing missing was comment from Virgin records.

    Talk about flawed logic;
    The don't release for fear of piracy (but it gets on the shelves and pulled) it gets pirated because it does get out, and the don't release it again for fear of piracy...after it has been pirated?

    Eh? Isn't that like burning down the locked barn down out of spite for the horse escaping?
    .

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  81. Re: "Pagannine" by Da+Schmiz · · Score: 2
    Umm... I think you mean Nicolò Paganini .

    Ever heard this guy play Paganini?

    Of course, still not what I would call "pop"...

    --

    "Anything is better than IE, and you can quote me on that." -- Wil Wheaton.

  82. Could just be all similar MP3s by ZxCv · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I downloaded the album in MP3 and immediately made a music CD of it. When I put it into a Windows box and Winamp queried CDDB, it came back as Eminem/The Eminem Show. And obviously, I'm not the only one who's done this. I just wonder what percentage of the early discs are MP3 downloads and what percentage are physical copies someone bought...

    --

    Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
    1. Re:Could just be all similar MP3s by zbuffered · · Score: 2

      I believe the track times are something they go by if there's no unique identifier. IE track 1 is 2m48s, track 2 3m5s, etc. That's a pretty easy way to determine what CD it is...

      --
      Synergy is your friend
  83. Re:had it for a week or two by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You liked it? You must be a white boy with a Dodge Neon that replaced the entire audio system with one giant subwoofer. Those are the only people I see listening to Eminem's "music".

  84. Whats so great about Slow P2P??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you've got Faaassssttttt newsgroups????

    Eh?

  85. From "In Living Color" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That boy is white, white, baby.

  86. Eminem is a comedian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you aren't too familar with his work, you might not relise this. He's put out some of the funniest lyrics I've ever heard. Long before he became popular people were passing around recordings from freestyle contests etc.. saying you HAVE to hear this.

    Of course his comedy isn't for everyone.. if you don't get the references its meaningless.

  87. That's +4 funny? by garyrich · · Score: 2

    Mozart, Vivaldi and particularly Paganini *are* popular music. Just by dead guys. There isn't really a karass of "slashdot readers", but if there were I don't think it would consist of people that *only* listen to any one thing. People that think all the greatest music was written by europeans between 1700-1900 are just as stupid as those (more common) that think all the worlds best music was written in the last 18 months.

    That said, Eminem is a talentless corporate hack. The sooner the vortex of history sucks him into the black hole that contains Vanilla Ice and Millie Vanilly the better.

    --
    -- your Web browser is Ronald Reagan
    1. Re:That's +4 funny? by jeeryg_flashaccess · · Score: 1

      When I get home I just may respond to that statement about Eminem being compared to Vanilla Ice, soon to fade into history. Either way, love him or not he's staying right where he is. That place being on top of course.

      P.S. It's free speech in it's purest form, and has a great beat to boot!

      --
      Life is like pants... fit in or you don't fit in.
    2. Re:That's +4 funny? by dietz · · Score: 1

      That said, Eminem is a talentless corporate hack. The sooner the vortex of history sucks him into the black hole that contains Vanilla Ice and Millie Vanilly the better.

      Eminem may be corporate and he may be a sell-out (I don't think so, but I could potentially agree if you hadn't shown yourself to be a dumbass already), but he's certainly not a talentless hack. Saying that just proves you know nothing about hip-hop, its culture, and how to appreciate it.

      Which is fine. I don't know much about Mozart, Vivaldi or Paganini, but you don't see me spouting off about how they're talentless hacks.

      The final straw was you (and everyone else) ignorantly comparing him to Vanilla Ice based on nothing but his skin color.

      Long before he ever hooked up with Dr. Dre, he won second place in the 1997 Rap Olympics (dedicated to freestyling), which is quite an accomplishment for a white person in a genre heavily biased against white people (as you've shown).

      If you've ever heard his freestyles on The Wake Up Show, you'd know that he has talent. But, of course, you haven't.

    3. Re:That's +4 funny? by garyrich · · Score: 2

      I'll confess that I don't like 99% of rap/hip-hop (I start to get interested at trip-hop). But then 99% of everything is crap, eh? I don't care if Eminem is purple and spotted. His "music" is boring and contrived. He uses "shock" words to get people attention - but then what does he do once he's gotten your attention? Nothing. He whines "fag, faq, fag" but does he have any new insights into "faggotry"? No. He's "shocking" just to get press. "There's no such thing as bad press". Works, I guess he makes big $$. Blah, Howard Stern with a beat - I'll pass.

      This tantrum he threw last week is a case in point. He screams an rants about he's going to hunt down and kill whoever ripped his new CD. Go home little boy. Better yet, go confront the Nigerians selling boots of the CD in Manhatten out of the trunks of cars for $5. Those guys have chunks of guys like Emeinem in their stool.

      --
      -- your Web browser is Ronald Reagan
    4. Re:That's +4 funny? by Bnonn · · Score: 1
      Perhaps it is his lyrics that are what cause so much negative bias against him? I know nothing of hip-hop and would not even consider it music by my own definition, but I certainly hold nothing against hip-hop artists. Eminem, however, I dislike intensely; I have not heard much of his music, but I have heard some. I have also had conversations with people who have heard much more. The general consensus appears to be that he is an advocate of homophobia, racism and violence.

      Now, he's quite entitled to his views, and I won't stop him trying to voice them, but it's hard to like someone with that image, you know? I try to see him as a social dissident or something, rebelling against political correctness, but it just isn't happening. People like that don't generally appear to have vastly inflated egos, extreme views or the need to appear cool. Which is how, frankly, Eminem comes across.

      Obviously I am no expert on the topic, and this isn't meant as a flame. I know that his image is probably based primarily in hip-hop; a culture I know little about. But he's not a difficult person to dislike, especially if you just catch an ad on TV for his album.

    5. Re:That's +4 funny? by beertopia · · Score: 1

      You know, I actually like a lot of hip-hop (more the underground side of it, usually) but I started disliking Eminem way before I ever heard his music, just based on reading reviews about it, seeing quotes from his stuff that seemed really stupid, etc.

      But once I actually ever heard any of him, I was instantly convinced: he's incredibly talented, and fucking hilarious. It's probably difficult to appreciate for a lot of people, 'cos rappers writing/rhyming/mc-ing skills can't easily be separated from their subject matter.

      But on the other hand, for all the abuse that he heaps on pretty much everyone in the world, he's pretty clear on how much he despises himself as well. He doesn't come across, to me, as a would-be badass, or street-wise thug, so much as a guy who's just intelligent and self-conscious to realize how fucked up he is, but who's talented and funny enough to make it fun for other people to listen to, as long as they don't take him seriously

      --
      -- 'intellectual property' is oxymoronic
    6. Re:That's +4 funny? by dietz · · Score: 1

      The general consensus appears to be that he is an advocate of homophobia, racism and violence.

      The charge of advocating violence gets an easy "yes" vote.

      While he's obviously homophobic, I really think that's been kinda blown out of proportion, and I honestly don't think it's fair to say he "advocates" it, but whatever, I'm kinda nitpicking now, and I'm obviously biased.

      As for claiming he's an advocate of racism, though, that's straight-up bullshit. I challenge you to find me one Eminem lyric that advocates racism. I don't think I've ever even heard him use the word "nigger"/"nigga", but even if he did, that still wouldn't make him racist. He came into popularity via Dr. Dre, his producer (black). The group he performed with in Detriot (D12) was him and five other black men. Frankly, whoever you've been talking to is clearly making shit up. He would never have made it this far in hip-hop being racist. It just wouldn't happen.

      Regardless, I am not arguing that you have to like him. I never said that. I can fully understand not listening to him on "moral" (or whatever you want to call it) grounds.

      What I was saying is that calling him a "talentless hack" was pure ignorance and that the constant comparisons to Vanilla Ice are a subtle form of racism. Yes indeedy.

    7. Re:That's +4 funny? by Nameles · · Score: 1

      He's racist against white people :P

    8. Re:That's +4 funny? by Zebbers · · Score: 1

      guy who's just intelligent and self-conscious to realize how fucked up he is, but who's talented and funny enough to make it fun for other people to listen to, as long as they don't take him seriously

      Mod this up. I never used to like rap, but am liking some of it more and more for the entertainment value. Ive always enjoyed eminem since I first heard him. Its funny, its timely. He raps about things everyone can appreciate...not just the ghetto or being a gangster. He does have an intelligence, not bookwise, but far superior to other cookiecutter /gun/bitch/blunt/ rappers. Not to mention the incredible skill he does has as a lyricist. I love how people tear apart diff genres of music, its like out of some kind of fear...or...like every other "I hate country/fords/asians/cheerleaders" out of ignorance, or just boredom. Defining yourself by what you don't like is easier than finding your likes and just enjoying them.

      I dont like a lot of music, and wont listen to it. But I have listened to bits of every genre...and like any other musician, I can appreciate the musical aspects of ANY type of music. Its not that hard, only requires half a brain to realize that everything takes some sort of skill whether or not YOU think it was worth it.

      I mean honestly. How pathetic are all you slashdotters who waste your breath, your energy and your time to "hate" and try to tear apart and tear down something you can't even come close to affecting. Its like a kid throwing a tantrum in the sandbox. *Hmmm... I wish I could build a castle like that. (WHACKS CASTLE DOWN) "Nah nah, youre castle sucked! Anyone could do that"

      Too bad, not many of you could ;)

    9. Re:That's +4 funny? by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Anyone who can't see this would obviously believe anything that they are told. Heck- many of the people here that claim that they hate Eminem also state that they have never heard any of his music. I am not saying that they need to like the stuff, but rather should not mistake it for something that it is not.

      Eminem has taken material that people consider to be too shocking and politically incorrect and turned it into his tunes. Add that to stupid, but well versed rhymes and you have something different than anyone else is willing to try. And people don't take everything in lige so god damned seriously, then perhaps they can enjoy and maybe think that it is funny.

      The man can freestyle better than almost anyone else in rap music today. It doesn't hurt that he tries to make people laugh, and he does it in such a way that gets everyone's attention.

      Shrooms and Vicodin?
      Murder?
      Suicide?
      Homosexuality?
      Shitt y pop stars?

      That takes balls.

  88. Re:Maybe that inflated the stats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you have the same name as my girlfriend

  89. Release date pushed up due to piracy. by Slider · · Score: 5, Informative

    The original release date was June 4th, but due to 'rampant piracy' the release was pushed up a week. It was officially released today.

    MTV News Article

    Andrew

    1. Re:Release date pushed up due to piracy. by foodb4nk · · Score: 1

      cant remember the last time i paid for music *sheesh* got the CD 4dayz ago. I will never want to pay for something i could get for free. Takes a moron to go out and buy something when they can get if for free

      --
      *huh* Sig? WTF?
    2. Re:Release date pushed up due to piracy. by pillohead · · Score: 1

      Originally it was going to be released on June 4th, but "due to rampant piracy" it was pushed back to Tuesday the 28th. I work at a Wherehouse music in Seattle and we were supposed to have a midnight sale on Tuesday. Due to Camelot music breaking street date we've been selling it since Saturday.

    3. Re:Release date pushed up due to piracy. by ghazban · · Score: 2

      It's people like you who actually cause the RIAA to come down on our case. I do use P2P programs to get music from time to time, and I used to download a lot, but if everyone had your attitude, I'd have to say that we'd be in the wrong. I'm not saying to buy every CD, but what's wrong with buying a couple cds of the music you /really/ like. The quality difference is worth it, unless if you're downloading mp3s at 256 or shns (unlikely).

      Besides, those 'morons' are funding your audio addiction.

    4. Re:Release date pushed up due to piracy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *cough* scripted *cough*

      makes for good lawsuit fodder after all.

  90. Re:But this will actually boost record sales, righ by gripdamage · · Score: 1

    Give me a break... Take about not seeing the forest for the trees. The content is the audio tracks. Whether or not their digital approximation exactly matches is a pointless comparison.

    If on the other hand you have a case that the sound produced is different enough that it can be reasonably distinguished from the original that would be different. From my personal mixes, I don't find that's the case.

  91. Released in Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw the CD is several stores for sale on the weekend in Australia.

  92. faggybob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    goddamn you are homosexual, i mean fucking christ, were you born with a cock up your ass? jesus

  93. Now we'll need the real data by jd142 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Assuming that none of the bootleg cd's are identical to the released cd, it would be nice if gracenote gave every request a unique identifier. Then we could see that A used a bootleg before the cd came out, but when the real cd came out, A bought that and had to re-download the songlist.

    I don't like unique identifiers either, but in this case it certainly would be nice if they were able to give us the data that says either "Yes, people who pirated the cd before it came out did purchase the cd within 6 months of release" or "No, people who pirate don't buy the cd within the first 6 months."

    A oneway hash of the computer's mac address + ip address as encapsulated in the packet would be easy enough to do so that Gracenote could track instances of contacts without tracking who is at the other end or giving any agency a method to quickly and easily determine who was at the other end.

    1. Re:Now we'll need the real data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck you. Yeah, lets have an easy way to track what people listen to, and lets have that list held by a company that obviously has no problem exploiting others (see gracenote treatment of freedb and all cddb contributors). In addition, do you think having valid data would have any sway over the RIAA. Guess what, it won't. Those fucks are going to do whatever they have to in order to protect their outdated and obsolete practices.

    2. Re:Now we'll need the real data by bmckeever · · Score: 1

      it would be nice if gracenote gave every request a unique identifier

      Holy Crap! That's what you say now, but there would be tons of bitching about privacy and talk of boycotting if they actually did.

      --
      Your favorite .sig sucks
  94. Re:had it for a week or two by Script0r · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm sorry, i couldn't hear you over your blatant disregard for other peoples tastes and opinions. I'm sure there are plenty of people that dislike whatever music you listen to.

  95. I call troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I call troll, this guy's obviously trying to get people to flame him....

    1. Re:I call troll by ZaBu911 · · Score: 1

      Not "trolling." And I'm not trying to get people to flame me.

      I'm just offering you my perspective. Don't like it? Fine. Ignore me. But at least you have gleaned a little information about the subculture of the younger Slashdot-reader.

    2. Re:I call troll by $0+31337 · · Score: 0

      But at least you have gleaned a little information about the subculture of the younger Slashdot-reader

      Jeez... All we get today is "information" from the subculture of the younger Slashdot reader.. I'd enjoy some information from the subculture of the mature Slashdot reader!

  96. Studios create crummy bootlegs to seed market... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If they were smart they'd roll out bootlegs as early as possible, and also as shitty as possible. This way, the P2P networks would pass them around and any decent quality bootlegs would be lost in the noise. On top of this, people who saw/listened to crummy bootlegs would want to go see the real thing if the pirated version was so poor.

    :-)

  97. Re:But this will actually boost record sales, righ by nullard · · Score: 1

    Read both CDs out in digital and do a bit-compare of them. You'll find that they are, indeed, extremely differet, because of the MP3 conversion process.

    Unless you dl'ed the CD image. These are not MP3s, these are identical cd copies.

    --


    t'nera semordnilap
  98. Paying the pirates? by Daetrin · · Score: 1
    What's even more sad than the fact that Eminem is ranked #2 is that people are _paying_ for pirate copies of media.

    You can argue the pros and cons of file sharing and information wanting to be free and such, but paying someone else to copy the music is dumb _and_ immoral.

    Either it should be free, or the artist should get paid. Somebody _other_ than the person who holds the rights making a profit off the thing is just wrong.

    ...Hey wait a minute, except for the "holding the rights" bit, that describes the RIAA to a T doesn't it?

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    1. Re:Paying the pirates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Somebody _other_ than the person who holds the rights making a profit off the thing is just wrong.

      That's why its two crimes, rather than one. Selling pirated copies is also fraud on top of piracy.

      Too bad the law considers piracy worse than fraud.

  99. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  100. Not the right track listing... by Nameles · · Score: 1

    Comparing it to various sources (CDNow, etc, my own copy), it's not even the right track listing. One lists one song "Without Me" twice, another is a remix album, and another (the closest), has the right tracks, in the right order, but with the skits ripped out.

    1. Re:Not the right track listing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my vers the right order, with skits. gotta love ftps, screw P2P

    2. Re:Not the right track listing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, that's where I got mine.

  101. You can steal it too, but good luck by Nailer · · Score: 2

    The release was put forward a month by what Em called `internet bootleg djs' and Interscope called pirates.

    But you can still try steal the album - you'll probably eventually get a full copy of it. But currently it might take a few days, at as a lot of the file sharing services are currently filled with bad mp3s, probably by Interscope, another organization they have hired, or a recording industry body. Most of the tracks you'll see from the Eminem show on file sharing networks are simply a ten second loop played over and over again. Others have a near complete track but stop and switch to country music in the middle, and others have quick noises thrown in there. The file sizes are often identical to the real tracks. There's probably a few different techniques, so its harder to look out for - a looped waveform is pretty easy to detect (with an app, or by listening to the music as it downloads), but the country music one is a lot harder to deal with (you'd already have downloaded 1/2 of the track before you realize its bad). There might be other techniques whoever is doing this has used.

    1. Re:You can steal it too, but good luck by Sc00ter · · Score: 2
      Suuuuuuure... That's why I just got a full retal version of the CD. Just finished now, and I started when I noticed this article.. So much for that plan.

    2. Re:You can steal it too, but good luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Most of the tracks you'll see from the Eminem show on file sharing networks are simply a ten second loop played over and over again.

      And this is different from his actual music how?

    3. Re:You can steal it too, but good luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He usually finds slight variations on the "I'm gonna fuck my mother" theme. These loops don't have anything like that in them I'm guessing.

    4. Re:You can steal it too, but good luck by damiam · · Score: 1

      I just downloaded the full album, fine quality 192kbps MP3, off giFT in about half an hour. So there.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  102. Re:A good test case for the 'Marketability' of pir by MikeD83 · · Score: 1

    Not piracy... the label allowed huge air time for the CD.
    The radio station Hot 93.7FM out of Hartford, CT played the whole CD from begining to end last week during prime time (10 PM).

  103. uhm, that is not exactly true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.etext.org/Zines/ASCII/Dub/_dub1_
    The Last Days Of Rap,By David Samuels,The New Republic,November 16, 1991
    "
    Neither side of the debate has been prepared, however, to confront what the
    entertainment industry's receipts from this summer proved beyond doubt:
    Although rap is still proportionally more popular among blacks, its primary
    audience is white and lives in the suburbs. And the history of rap's
    degeneration from insurgent black-street music to mainstream pop points to
    another dispiriting conclusion: that the more rappers were packaged as violent
    black criminals, the bigger their white audiences became.
    "

    middle class white males in the burbs,
    like CmdrTaco, and most of the rest of slashdot's
    readership, and especially most of slashdots authors,
    eminem is about as far from their reality
    as Ice-T's was from Lee Iacocca's

  104. Re:A good test case for the 'Marketability' of pir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data.' " -- Mike Quear, US Congressional staffer
    Wow, that guy must've gotten teased a lot about his name.

  105. Sigh by Silver222 · · Score: 2
    Actually, the line is, "I shot a man in Reno, just to watch him die."


    Of course, you are taking the line completely out of context. And the fact that you can compare Eminem to one of the greatest modern musical performers is just a joke. What next, Eminem and John Lennon?

    --
    "It's not a war on drugs, it's a war on personal freedom. Keep that in mind at all times." Bill Hicks
    1. Re:Sigh by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      Have you listened to the music? As far as taking rap styles to another level he is quite a performer. He is now part of the evil empire of the RIAA but he did struggle to "make it" for years.

      I'm not saying he is better than Jonny Cash or Lennon, what I am saying is that when it comes to style and message they are on the same footing. There is a message. There are things that piss important white people off.

      Let's compare Lennon. A man who tried to stop the war and bring change in his generation. He pissed a lot of people off and about 80% of the population hated his music. I'm wondering how many FBI pages were on him?

      Eminem does deserve some credit for not filling all 70 odd minutes with pure crap. He does say intellegent things (and please don't bother pointing out one song while not pointing out another).

      Look up the lyrics.. Tupac is another. His life may have been filled with crime (ironic that his lawyer David Kenner has the most motive to have had him killed and his life before rap was one of being a nerd despite his rhetoric) but his music filled with a message.

      (Let's also look at "Biggie Smalls". Was a crack dealer, shaped up and afterward was killed by people thought to be LAPD...)
      (Of course Lennon was killed on the way to seeing his grown son for the first time... great guy!)

    2. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      what I am saying is that when it comes to style and message they are on the same footing


      Not even close. Not even remotely. Style wise, Lennon, the Beatles and Sir George Martin invented sounds unlike anything else ever heard before in pop music ("Pet Sounds" is the closest precursor) as well as having many, many memorable lyrics. I'm not so aware of the historical context of Johnny Cash's arrival on the scene, so perhaps you can make a comparison there (although it feels inherently wrong to me). Eminem invented no sounds, no style, only words. He didn't really even up the ante from B.I.G. or many other rap/hip-hop artists, he simply made his stories the white and bad marriage version. His lyrics may occasion a nice line every once in a while but he is no genius. In twenty years, a miniscule fraction of the number of people who will be listening to the Beatles will be listening to Eminem.


      Let's compare Lennon... He pissed a lot of people off and about 80% of the population hated his music

      You really have no sense of history, do you? The only time Lennon pissed everyone off was when he said the Beatles were "bigger than Jesus". This was when they were, in America, probably bigger than Jesus. Eventually most people went back to buying Beatles records. His later anti-war actions were not particularly damaging to his reputation, regardless of how the FBI thought of him. I have no idea where you're pulling 80% but if you're talking about Lennon's cumulative work, you're completely wrong. The Beatles are now, have been, and will continue to be the most loved recording group for a long, long time. I would write that they could have kept putting out records for as long as they wanted, however that's misleading because they kept putting out good records, so until their collections came out, they never really cashed in purely off of their reputation. Some of the work Lennon did with Yoko is downright horrible but I don't think that sullied his reputation too much.


      Besides being more creative and more talented than Eminem, Lennon also had more to say. I'm not sure where you come up with Biggie Smalls or Tupac being bringers of a message so I guess it's understandable that you'll disagree and think that Eminem has a message. I listened to "Ready To Die" a few times a week for about a year (2000-2001) and all the lyrics I can come up with are things like "I used to lick the clits alot but licking clits had to stop". It was fun music and juvenile entertainment but not substantive. For all three of them, their message is their style and their style isn't from reality but from a fantasy coined from reality. It's only once they adopted their style, their image, that it became a reality for them. Since their style is their message, their style has to be that much the better to make them talented, long lasting cultural touchstones. [A literary example would be Oscar Wilde - although he had messages, his style was the real raison d'etre.] No matter how good initial sales are, shock lyrics don't last without strong talent because they become less shocking and devaluate over time. Eminem relying on talent without shock will not come to pass, at least not successfully. BTW, although I admire the Beatles and Lennon I'm not a fanatic. I own two CDs of the Beatles and a Lennon CD I found at an old apartment of mine.

    3. Re:Sigh by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      I know the Beatles are good, I didn't deny that.

      I don't mean to say that scum of "Biggie Smalls" (name taken from a Bill Cosby movie) is any good either.

      Just that the message of the words sometimes are worth hearing, if only once.

      All music deserves that I believe...

    4. Re:Sigh by mill · · Score: 1

      Lennon? No. Elvis? Yes.

      Eminem is an entertainer and frankly I don't care if what he says stems from the truth or not. He tells a story and he does it in an entertaining and sometimes thought provoking way.

      Besides his videos are hilarious and he sure is a step up from that other motor city madman - Ted Nugent.

      Shemekia Copeland beats all of them in the vocal department - ooh baby.

      /mill

  106. There are people still using Gracenote? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell? I thought we all ditched Assnote in favor of FREEDB after they STOLE the data people contributed to them in good faith. Why are we supporting them with this story?

  107. Is this CD protected? by schulzdogg · · Score: 2

    For a while there were rumors that this CD would be released as a copy protected CD. Was it? Can you play it in your computer? Please respond, because i'd like to buy it, but if i can't play it on the computer there's no real need to.

    1. Re:Is this CD protected? by NFNNMIDATA · · Score: 1

      Works for me. I didn't get the one with the free DVD though, so I can't speak to that.

    2. Re:Is this CD protected? by schulzdogg · · Score: 1
      Works for me. I didn't get the one with the free DVD though, so I can't speak to that.



      Cool thanks for letting me know.

    3. Re:Is this CD protected? by Radrik · · Score: 1

      Works fine for the DVD version. Great CD by the way. By far some of the most introspective and powerful lyrics to date, although the beats get old after a while (i.e., one week of constant listening).

      "...You laugh til your motherfuckin' ass gets drafted
      When you're in band camp thinkin' the crap can't happen
      'Til you fuck around get an anthrax napkin
      Inside a package wrapped in Saranwrap wrappin'
      Open the plastic, and then you stand back gaspin'
      Fuckin' assassins hijackin' Amtraks crashin'
      All this terror, America demands action
      Next thing you know, you've got Uncle Sam's ass askin'
      To join our Army, or what you do for their Navy
      You just a baby gettin' recruited at 18
      You're on a plane now eatin' that food and that baked beans
      I'm 28, they gon' take you 'fore they take me." -Eminem, "Square Dance"

    4. Re:Is this CD protected? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      German version is. No other versions are.

    5. Re:Is this CD protected? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

      The question you want ot ask is: Is is copy restricted?

      I think it is not.

      --
      IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  108. Hasty Generalization Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I wouldn't expect Michael Moore to be familiar with that...

  109. WI by Duh1 · · Score: 1

    it was released in wisconsin on friday. a best buy released it upon shipment arrival, and therefor the producer said all of WI could put it out. so its all old new for cheese heads here

    1. Re:WI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you guys have rap in wisconsin??

  110. no goverment involvment? by Twillerror · · Score: 1

    I wonder why the goverment has yet to really step into this whole RIAA MPAA crap. Sure they passed the DMCA, but has it really effected anything that truely matters.

    The goverment has yet to step in an force ISP's to shut down these programs. Basically they are letting these organizations sue them death. I think because because people would be pissed if the goverment took Napster away. People generally feel they have no power over corporations, but in general we do still have some control over our goverment.

  111. John Lennon vs Eminem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    E - Wants to kill NSYNC
    JL - Gives peace a chance
    WINNER: Eminem

    JL - Marries crazy woman
    E - Sings about killing crazy women
    WINNER: Undecided

    JL - Target of bullets
    E - Putative dispenser of bullets
    WINNER: Undecided (boooooo)

    JL - Best friends are musicians
    E - Best friends think they are musicians
    WINNER: John Lennon

    JL - Best friends are musicians
    E - Hangs out with a Doctor
    WINNER: Eminem

    JL - Smokes pot
    E - Does god knows what
    WINNER: John Lennon (Say no to drugs kids)

    JL - Has Yoko in videos
    E - Has Jenna Jameson in Videos
    WINNER: Eminem

    JL - Music lives on
    E - Has to keep reminding people he is back
    WINNER: John Lennon

    1. Re:John Lennon vs Eminem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JL - Sucks
      E - Sucks
      WINNER: Eminem (Jenna Jameson trump card)

  112. This Just Emphasizes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the fact that not only are 'net users heavily invested in P2P networks, but that they also have no taste; 'Eminem'...? Oh God...!

  113. Demo CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could this just be a Demo CD... Gracenote shows that the cd only has one song on it

  114. Not sure if this has been said yet.. by Knoxvill3 · · Score: 1

    But according to the Gracenote newsletter I just recieved, Eminem's CD is now #1 on the chart as opposed to #2. And Celine Dion's CD is #7. Great Copy Protection going on here, I wonder if the RIAA hired the same kids they had scouring the internet to find MP3's write this protection mechanism.

    --
    ======
    Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish. - Euripides
  115. Re:Anybody notice? by ruin · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...Celine Dion's A New Day Has Come, which is supposed to be unplayable in computers due to its copy protection...

    What a coincidence; it's also unplayable in CD players due the horrible sounds that come out of the speakers when you hit the play button.

    </end recycled joke>

    --
    share and enjoy
  116. Ask the Monkeys who holds the rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RIAA to a T. RIAA is same as bootleggers at the swap meet, except with more power.

    bastards

  117. Re:A good test case for the 'Marketability' of pir by swordboy · · Score: 2

    The bootleg versions of AotC and Spidey are much poorer quality than you will see in the theatre.

    I beg to differ...

    A friend recently showed off a Spider-Man DVD complete with menus. Full quality. I was shocked...

    You can buy them in the Detroit area for $10.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
  118. Ring of Fire by istartedi · · Score: 2

    When I was a kid, one of the older boys... 13-ish, 14-ish, actually made a ring of fire with gasoline around some people and set it ablaze. They had been spending the day firing illegal fireworks and stuff, and that was one of the straws the broke the camels back. The cops were called. I didn't witness the alleged ring-of-fire incident; it may have been just a tale told by the older kids, but the cops *were* called (as confirmed by adults talking about it) and I did see something I had never seen before--a model rocket (no doubt they were planning to fire it at an angle less than that recommended by the Estes junior rocketeer's guidelines). At any rate, maybe Johnny Cash had something to do with it... Ring of Fire was Cash, right? or was that Elvis?

    A while later, this kid was playing army with b-b guns, and he got shot in the neck. He was lucky it didn't hit anything important. Maybe he thought he would "be all that he could be" if he decided to engage in live fire exercises instead of just playing football or something...

    Then again, I can't think of what might have inspired this guy I knew to blow a log 6 feet into the air with home-made explosives, or for me to start a fire with methanol on a concrete driveway and extinguish it mere seconds before my friend's mother turned the corner, or to play with bottle-rockets, matches and stuff. It seemed like there was that age... like... 13 to 14, where fire and explosions were the thing to do. Most of us grew out of it. The ones who had all of their fingers left and didn't grow out of it must have joined the army or something.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  119. The Eminem Show by wwwgregcom · · Score: 1

    was released early and is available in stores in my area. Chances are these aren't all piracy.

    --
    What signature defines me as a person?
  120. Piracy has impacted the business model. by Boiling_point_ · · Score: 3, Interesting
    from an NME article posted by another /.er...

    As a result of the leak, the album will now be released on Monday (May 27).

    If the problem is defined as "pre-release cheap copies will stop people buying later, full price copies", haven't the advocates for change won a battle here?

    I mean, hasn't the record company just realised that artificial marketing delays inherent in the offline distribution process are likely to hurt their sales?

    By releasing the album electronically with (1) fast servers, (2) lossless compression and (3) a reasonable price, and simultaneously sending "gimme airplay!" copies to radio stations (etc.) as is done now, they could cut this sort of "I don't want to wait" piracy down. Sure people will still re-rip the album at 128KB/s and make it available through P2P, but they were going to do that anyway. What do the record companies have to lose, by adopting the practice I have described?

    Ditto for software. Clearly you're not going to get packaging, cover-art, glossy manuals or whatever, through TCP/IP, but doesn't the prevalence of warez and pirated music blatantly show that a sh1tload of people simply don't care? How hard is it to put a "download PDF manual | snailmail me a hardcopy for $5" option together? Or just make the manuals available in normal bookstores?

    --
    "If you create user accounts, by default, they will have an account type of Administrator with no password." KB Q293834
  121. Re:A good test case for the 'Marketability' of pir by CConkle · · Score: 1

    Getting off topic, but... Isn't this the function of all those groups--THX and so forth--that you see at the end of the credits, to ensure high quality of the theaters? I know it's optimistic to expect much, but wouldn't a certain point come where their THX certification (and equivalents) might be challenged? I recall a phone number or two at the end of Star Wars, "If anything detracted from your appreciation of this film, call.."

    (I saw SW in digital at the Grauman Chinese in Hollywood... the projection was excellent. Sharp, beautiful colors, sound kicked ass. Was it just me, though, or was the black point of the digital projector maybe a bit high? I need to see it again now. :)

  122. release dates... by Indril · · Score: 1

    The date was moved up, then I went to my local chain CD store and found they were on sale because Sam Goody broke street date sometime before Friday the 24th.

  123. Re:A good test case for the 'Marketability' of pir by Dirtside · · Score: 2

    Would you mind saying what theater chain did that? I'd like to avoid patronizing them if possible.

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  124. PS2, of course off topic... by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

    OT so I nested this under your post.

    Retail sales are odd.

    For the past two weeks the PS2 has been advertised as costing $299 but the xBox for $199.

    Didn't Sony say it first?

    1. Re:PS2, of course off topic... by angelo · · Score: 1

      Even funnier was bestbuy.com saying the playstation 2 is at $199, and underneath a picture of the XBox and a link saying BUY IT TODAY which also linked to the XBox.

      I honestly think that it wasn't an oversight, and was a case of collusion between the box stores and msft. Only two stores advertised 200 for XBox and 300 for PS2, Best Buy and Circuit shitty. For two weeks.

      Dishonest. No surprises there.

  125. Vivendi is to blame by momovt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How can the Vivendi/Universal complain of piracy, when it was someone *INSIDE* the company that initially *Pirated* the copy that is now on the internet.

    1. Re:Vivendi is to blame by Boiling_point_ · · Score: 2
      How can the Vivendi/Universal complain of piracy, when it was someone *INSIDE* the company that initially *Pirated* the copy that is now on the internet.

      Maybe because that employee him/herself didn't create and distribute the gazillion copies needed to justify Eminem hitting the top of Gracenote?? :P
      --
      "If you create user accounts, by default, they will have an account type of Administrator with no password." KB Q293834
  126. Re:A good test case for the 'Marketability' of pir by number+one+duck · · Score: 3, Funny

    Heh, but not going to see the movie is *stealing*. You benefit from the economic boom that these movies provide in times of war, and there is an implied contract in that benefit that you will go to see the film, possibly many times....

  127. What?! by JohnG · · Score: 2
    Thank god they shut down napster and stopped piracy.

    Yeah, and thank god they arrested Jeffrey Dalmer and stopped murder!
    This is the reason why it's so hard for people who would be against the RIAA to be totally on the side of the average pro-napster guy. This argument FOR napster is every bit as ignorant as the RIAAs argument AGAINST it. There are many similar examples on Slashdot regarding the DMCA. Yes the RIAA is evil, yes the DMCA is evil, but we need to stop pretending that they are trying to sneak into our houses at night and murder us in our sleep if anybody with influence is going to take us seriously.

  128. Morons, all around... by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1, Troll



    You're damn right this is a fucking flame. I'm tired of it.

    A) If you believe this album was "leaked" or somehow released accidentally, I have a bridge in Brooklyn i'd like to sell you. Record companies do this intentionally to boost record sales on artists they suspect will tank. For that matter, if you even believe the "Billboard" charts are anything other than a marketing tool for record labels, again, I've got a great bridge i'd like to sell you. Entries in the Billboard charts are bought and sold like superbowl commercials. Record Label A pays $X,XXX,XXX to rent the #2 position for a week, to promote their artist, while Record Label B pays $X,XXX,XXX for #4, #11, #24 and so on, and so on.. Its carved up like a pie with the best slice given to the highest bidder. Wake up.

    B) If you have so much time in your hands that you can sit around and listen to sonic diarrhea like Eminem, you even more of a goddamn moron than I thought, Rob. Theres so much good music out there, both today and yesterday, and all you can think to do is listen to a big steaming crock of crap. Niiiice.

    C) This is neither news for nerds, nor stuff that matters. I just opened a site for the Linux community, to give them a place to share desktop themes without all the foo-foo bullshit of Freshmeat/Themes.org. I tried submitting the opening announcement here no less than 3 times, and had it rejected every time. Meanwhile, you want to tell your Oprah book club about controversy that isn't really a controversy. You running a infomercial site now, Rob?

    Cheers,

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:Morons, all around... by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 2



      Yeah, and so what if I blew the Laika link. Here's the one you were supposed to get..

      --
      Bowie J. Poag

    2. Re:Morons, all around... by tswinzig · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Record Label A pays $X,XXX,XXX to rent the #2 position for a week, to promote their artist, while Record Label B pays $X,XXX,XXX for #4, #11, #24 and so on, and so on.. Its carved up like a pie with the best slice given to the highest bidder. Wake up.

      This is bullshit folks. My brother works with one of the biggest rock bands in the country, and hangs out with the guys in the band. He is good friends with the guy that manages the band, and gets to see the exact sales numbers each week. The billboard charts are absolutely legit.

      The burden of proof is on you, if you want to dispute the validity of a standard chart like that.

      C) This is neither news for nerds, nor stuff that matters. I just opened a site for the Linux community, to give them a place to share desktop themes without all the foo-foo bullshit of Freshmeat/Themes.org. I tried submitting the opening announcement here no less than 3 times, and had it rejected every time. Meanwhile, you want to tell your Oprah book club about controversy that isn't really a controversy. You running a infomercial site now, Rob?

      Sounds like you'd rather he allow you to post your infomercial, so why are you bitching? I'd much rather read about a possibly large case of internet piracy than YATS (yet another theme site).

      BTW, I checked out your site, and it sucks.

      Now that's a flame.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    3. Re:Morons, all around... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah and your music is just great. Blow it out your ass and find something half decent your self righteous cock monger.

    4. Re:Morons, all around... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bowie, a while ago you said you were never coming back to slashdot, and you actually left for a while.

      Now you seem to be back again. Why don't you fuck off for good? We're tired of your childish anti-VA/themes.org/slashdot rants. Cram it up your ass, ok?

    5. Re:Morons, all around... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your site sucks just as bad. No GNOME themes?! Pfft.

      aeon

    6. Re:Morons, all around... by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 2



      Of course they see sales numbers.. But those numbers have absolutely nothing to do with how many albums their label ships. Tell your brother who works for "one of the biggest rock bands in the country" that his record label decides in advance wether or not their album will go gold, platinum, or quadruple-platinum, usually before the album is even recorded. The record company doesnt care if the CDs end up in the bargain rack. If they want to have an act "go quadruple platinum", its because they ship the album in that quantity, not because it actually sells in that quantity. Again, wake up. Its been an established practice in the recording industry for decades. Hell, i've got a damn Devo video from '79 that even makes a joking reference to that practice...

      "Parcheesi, a new group! Ship platinum!"

      Its like this. The recording industry only has to be smart enough to fool their core demographic---teenagers. That means, they develop scams that can out-think an 18 year old with $20 to his name. It aint that hard, in other words. :)

      Cheers,

      --
      Bowie J. Poag

    7. Re:Morons, all around... by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      Of course they see sales numbers.. But those numbers have absolutely nothing to do with how many albums their label ships. Tell your brother who works for "one of the biggest rock bands in the country" that his record label decides in advance wether or not their album will go gold, platinum, or quadruple-platinum, usually before the album is even recorded. The record company doesnt care if the CDs end up in the bargain rack. If they want to have an act "go quadruple platinum", its because they ship the album in that quantity, not because it actually sells in that quantity.

      Don't be a friggin idiot. You didn't think anyone here could call you on this, and I did. Do you think the labels could (or would?) ship platinum levels of these CD's to retailers, to have them sit in the bins? Do you think the retailers would continue buying, week after week, as their bargain racks get filled up with this same CD?

      The stores aren't going to keep buying it if it ain't selling! Duh.

      You act like it's free to ship 10 million CD's for the label, and it's free for the stores to acquire these 10 million CD's.

      Its been an established practice in the recording industry for decades.

      Uhh yeah, an established practice with no proof whatsoever (or even LOGIC).

      Hell, i've got a damn Devo video from '79 that even makes a joking reference to that practice...

      Wow, I stand corrected! A reference from Devo! Solid proof if I've ever heard it.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    8. Re:Morons, all around... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, this is an ac posted late to the discussion, but here goes:

      Hi, I work for the record company, you are the purchasing supervisor for all the YYY chain of record stores. We know that the backstreet boys are selling well, so if you still want us to ship you the CD's at (insert discount prices), then you also MUST buy 10,000 copies of RANDOM_NEW_BAND. Don't like the deal? then fine you lose your discount on the Backstreet Boys CD.

      Does this sound fimiliar? Kinda like our favourite computer company?

      Yeah I thought so.

      And you have as much proof as the other person arguing. My brother works for one of the largets bands in the country. Wow, that's solid proof right there.

      So you are both WRONG, because no proof is offered by you.

      But as for me, I find it more likely to believe that record companies pay for billboard placement,
      even if it is not as direct as one of the parent posts said.

      -0-0-0-0-0-0-
      -0-B-L-A-H-0-
      -0-0-0-0-0-0-

    9. Re:Morons, all around... by g8oz · · Score: 1
      But those numbers have absolutely nothing to do with how many albums their label ships.

      One word fuckwad. SoundScan

    10. Re:Morons, all around... by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      Hi, I work for the record company, you are the purchasing supervisor for all the YYY chain of record stores. We know that the backstreet boys are selling well, so if you still want us to ship you the CD's at (insert discount prices), then you also MUST buy 10,000 copies of RANDOM_NEW_BAND. Don't like the deal? then fine you lose your discount on the Backstreet Boys CD.

      First of all, there is a HUGE difference between getting a new band on the shelf in small numbers, and "buying a multi-platinum" rating by somehow forcing millions of CD's into the retail channel, as the the guy that started this thread claims.

      And you have as much proof as the other person arguing. My brother works for one of the largets bands in the country. Wow, that's solid proof right there.

      I don't have to prove anything. The billboard charts have been a standard way of ranking album sales for DECADES. If someone can prove it's a sham, they would of done so by now. If the guy that started this thread wants to spout his bullshit about how the rankings are bought by the labels, then let him show us the proof (Devo quotes aside).

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    11. Re:Morons, all around... by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 2

      A simple Google search for "Billboard AND Scam" will produce the answer you're looking for.

      Here's a hint. Tackle it in chunks.. Read the first 10 pages today, then the next 10 pages tomorrow, then 10 more on the day after that, etc...

      Cheers,

      --
      Bowie J. Poag

    12. Re:Morons, all around... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      crawl back in your hole richie

    13. Re:Morons, all around... by dpu · · Score: 1

      hot damn! just did a search at Google for "billboard AND scam" and guess what? only a couple links referring to Billboard magizine (and both links were from Billboard about a story they did on scam artists). everything else was entirely unrelated - billboards in alaska. no, seriously :)

      bowie, did you even bother to take your own advice? evidently not. so shut up unless you can offer actual proof that the Billboard charts are a scam (or otherwise as dishonest as certain other charts).

      --
      Dammit, I meant to post that anonymously!
  129. Inflation and longer albums make up the difference by yerricde · · Score: 1

    $15 for 80 mins of music is insane. I remember buying cassette tapes for $5 BRAND SPANKING NEW at the Turtles down the road.

    1. Longer albums. Back in the day, when vinyl was king, 35 minutes was considered an album; nowadays, CD albums average 70 minutes.

    2. Inflation. CDs cost USD 17 now, but $17 in AD2002 dollars is worth about $9 in AD1983 dollars (when CDs were first released).

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  130. I'm not disagreeing... by Bnonn · · Score: 1
    ...that the prices of CDs are disproportionately high, but when one is remembering buying stuff cheaply, one must take into account that nasty price-hiking bastard: Inflation.

    Now, I have no doubt that inflation has accounted for only a smallish percentage of the total rise in cost, but it's something that should be kept in mind. On the other hand though, I suppose it's likely that manufacturing costs have gone down, which should have balanced the system out.

    So yeah, you're right, the music industry is bloated, money-hungry and mostly produces music not worth the CDs its printed on.

    What was my point again..?

  131. Re:Maybe that inflated the stats by moosesocks · · Score: 3, Funny

    Or it could be all those iMac users who can't get the darn thing out of their CD drives.

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  132. No accounting for taste I assume by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I've pre-ordered my copy and am looking forward to hearing it."

  133. "I say download the audio on MP3" by yerricde · · Score: 2

    Whoever put my shit on the Internet, I want to meet that motherfucker and beat the shit out of him... - Eminem

    So has Eminem's attitude changed since he recorded "The Real Slim Shady"? "I say download the audio on MP3 and show the whole world..." -- Eminem

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:"I say download the audio on MP3" by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Interesting quote. It could be that his attitude changed, or it could be that he was pissed over the fact that the bootleg mp3s were released before the album was even released.

    2. Re:"I say download the audio on MP3" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new slashdotsucks.com sucks, I liked the old one (the "Adequacy" one) better. Bring it back!!!!!

    3. Re:"I say download the audio on MP3" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to http://www.adequacy.org/ then, stupid.

    4. Re:"I say download the audio on MP3" by NexusTw1n · · Score: 1

      Except the line actually says

      "I should download her audio on MP3 and show the whole world how you gave Eminem VD "


      In reference to Christina Aguilera.

      Eminem has never condoned music piracy, in fact Doc Dre and Interscpope were there at the front alongside Metallica in the original Napster battle.

      --
      It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity. --Albert Einstein
  134. Re:But this will actually boost record sales, righ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >But I can't support stealing.

    Then stop people shoplifting his album.

    Ohhh, wait a minute, you're talking about copyright violation. You do realise that stealing requires someone to lose either their rights to something (ala: Stealing an essay by changing someones name on it and resubmitting it) or they must lose physical posession of it (ala: I just took your car for a joyride).

    If people would stop using improper definitions their view on "piracy" (a true term for the act, if not far too overloaded) would be much mellowed. I mean, why should murder get you a shorter jail sentence than indirectly supporting the economy by increasing the sale of CD-Rs?

  135. My tired, tired argument. by al3x · · Score: 1

    Okay, same deal as when the editors were hyping Spiderman and StarWars: it's not cool to bash the RIAA and MPAA, and then go and slurp down their output (especially this high-visibility, fake-controversey, ultra-marketed crap). I know how damn BORING hypocrisy is, but this is really just disgusting. The entertainment industry is never going to take their self-proclaimed opposition seriously if they can count on them as CUSTOMERS!!!

  136. CDDB works on track lengths by yerricde · · Score: 2

    Assuming that none of the bootleg cd's are identical to the released cd

    They are identical. The highest-quality pirates, the ones who trade .shn and .flac instead of .mp3 or .ogg, include "cue files" with their audio sets that describe exactly how long each track lasts. Because Gracenote's CDDB system works solely on track lengths, Gracenote has no way to distinguish some pirate discs from genuine discs.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:CDDB works on track lengths by burnetd · · Score: 1

      Vorbis files decode to the exact same length as the original data.

  137. Plan 9 from Eminem by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    Is it possible, just possible, that the people backing Eminem realize the potential of a pre-release MP3 on sales and are using it to their advantage? HA! I almost had myself believing that one... Well, sooner or later somebody is bound to get smart about this sort of thing.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  138. Pent-up hostility by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    Kinda reminds me of Eminem.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  139. Payola? by chiph · · Score: 1

    What with all the allegations of Pay for Play going on right now with the Radio industry, I wouldn't be surprised if a similar set of events isn't occuring in the online world too.

    After all, the streaming audio sites are under tremendous pressure to make a profit, and when the indie promotor shows up with a briefcase full of money, it must be very tempting to go along with his playlist "suggestions".

    Chip H.

  140. Eminen's opinion on this situation... by DigitalHammer · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's an interesting article I found at www.nme.com...

    Link (http://www.nme.com/news/101808.htm)

    EMINEM'S PIRATE WAR!

    EMINEM is threatening to "beat the shit" out of fans who have illegally uploaded his music onto the Internet.
    Despite his new album, 'The Eminem Show', being one of the most closely guarded pre-release projects in history, it is now widely available to buy and download illegally weeks ahead of release.

    Despite strict security measures, all 20 tracks from 'The Eminem Show' are available on the Internet, almost a month ahead of the album's June 3 release - meaning his label Interscope could lose millions.

    The rapper said bluntly: "I think that shit is fucking bullshit. Whoever put my shit on the Internet, I want to meet that motherf***er and beat the shit out of him, because I picture this scrawny little dickhead going 'I got Eminem's new CD! I got Eminem's new CD! I'm going to put it on the Internet.' I think that anybody who tries to make excuses for that shit is a fucking bitch."

    Internet downloading of music has concerned labels and artists, but there is an even greater fear about bootlegging - selling copies of the downloaded music to fans who can't wait for the real thing or can't afford it. Copies of 'The Eminem Show'' were being sold openly in New York last week for $5.

    As a result of the leak, the album will now be released on Monday (May 27). For more on this story, see this week's NME, which is out in London now and nationwide tomorrow (May 22).
    ---

    Ouch. Eminen should really take some Prozac or Ritalin before press conferences...he might get better PR...

    1. Re:Eminen's opinion on this situation... by acceleriter · · Score: 1
      Can you say "publicity stunt," boys and girls? Now say it with me: "publicity stunt."

      That was good. Now can we say "washed-up has been?" Sure we can.

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  141. Re:But this will actually boost record sales, righ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, why should murder get you a shorter jail sentence than indirectly supporting the economy by increasing the sale of CD-Rs?

    I guess the only question this leaves is: are you a troll or an idiot? I agree that simply copying the work shouldn't be considered stealing, but mass public distribution on the other hand...

  142. Sad, angry little man. by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    Everybody wants to be a bad-ass.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  143. nonono by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 3, Funny

    You're not gonna get a -1 Flamebait modded as +1 insightful unless you mention how your poor post is gonna ruin your karma!

    --
    [o]_O
  144. Eh? Identified by Exact length? by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    If they're ID'd by exact length of the songs, I suspect that this is done by those who would be pirating regaurdless of digital format [assuming demand was just as high]
    My reasoning goes like this:
    when some shithead trying to make money off a pirated CD makes copies, he copies the data directly from CD to CD, all the data is the same.
    However, when Bob Fuckface, ordinary internet shmuck like one of millions who uses sharing programs does it, he takes a CD, rips it to MP3, then burns it again later when some asshole friend wont shut up; or, he downloads the MP3s, and burns it to CD from those.
    When /I/ rip CDs [since I hate these stupid physical things], I tend to wind up with a half second to five seconds cut off on the song, because the silence is removed, or the compresser throws it out, or the ripper decides to be shitfaced and stops early or something. Then when I burn the CD, I burn it in the order I want to burn it, and usually dont use all the same songs from one album.
    Just a thought, I dont understand how they can expect accurate readings from a copied CD. maybe someone who's stupid enough to think that pointing out how I'm wrong does somebody some good will respond

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  145. Re:Inflation and longer albums make up the differe by Digitalia · · Score: 1

    There is a major flaw in your reasoning. Though inflation is likely to cause the price to rise, the cost of production for anything always decreases over time, until such a point when demand begins to drastically decline. It's fundamental. Since demand has done nothing but increase, and since the technologies employed in the production of CDs have not decreased in efficiency, the actual cost of the albums should have decreased over time. In fact, it is very likely that it did. However, price has not followed trend, and has actually gone up at a rate greater than inflation.

    Moreover, if you compare cost/length for albums, cassettes, and compact discs, you will discover that the proper ranking, when adjusted for inflation, is cassettes, then compact discs, and finally vinyl, from least to greatest.

    --
    Pax Digitalia
  146. Re:A good test case for the 'Marketability' of pir by jethro200 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    avoid patronizing them? i will patronize any chain that will give me tickets to new releases for $2. i am sick of paying the outrageous $8.75 i pay in cincinnati. the only place that sells tickets for $2 around here is about 2 years later in getting the movie than everybody else. not only that, but the quality sucks and the springs in the seats poke me in the butt.

  147. Re:A good test case for the 'Marketability' of pir by svwolfpack · · Score: 2

    Actually, I picked it up today, and there's a bonus DVD included with it with interviews and videos of him live, so it was really worth it. Also, this is the first rap CD i've bought where the full lyrics to all the songs were in the liner notes, so that also was a bonus.

  148. Get the facts stright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The CD has been released, it was released sunday at midnight for sale to the general public. I know a number of stores in my podunk town that were open at midnight to sell it.

    It's completely possible that the numbers you're referring to were generated over the holiday weekend.

  149. Re:A good test case for the 'Marketability' of pir by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

    I suppose that's what happens when a certain large theatre operator drops ticket prices to $2 just long enough to run all the competition out of business, and then jacks the prices back up.

    The other thing that happens is that large theatre operator gets sued for anti-trust violations.

  150. Expensive music videos by yerricde · · Score: 2

    the cost of production for anything always decreases over time, until such a point when demand begins to drastically decline.

    Music production is a labor-intensive industry, and the cost of employing songwriters, vocalists, musicians, and recording engineers has not gone down.

    Since demand has done nothing but increase

    An "increase in demand" means an increase in quantity demanded at all price levels. It pushes the demand curve (the one shaped like a \ sign) up and to the right. This causes an increase in both price and quantity supplied.

    and since the technologies employed in the production of CDs have not decreased in efficiency

    How are you sure of this? The primary thing that has become more efficient since the dawn of the CD has been the studio process, and in general, studio costs are completely recouped out of the artist's royalties.

    In fact, the promotional expenses (also recouped out of the artist's royalties) have actually increased. The promotion agencies are able to bleed the labels more for "adds" to Clear Channel's playlist. Music videos become more extravagant each year. Courtney Love would be glad to do the math for you.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Expensive music videos by Digitalia · · Score: 1

      The production of the music is labor-intensive, but the production of the resultant product is not labor-intensive. I must apologize immediately for ignoring the artist's labor, as it changes things considerably. If one considers this, then he must invariably conclude that production costs have increased, as you have claimed.

      The only argument I can make in response is that most of these costs are secondary to the actual production of the albums, and as such, they should not be passed on to the consumer. In a perfect world, I should not be required to pay for a music video which I will never benefit from, and from which millions of non-paying consumers will. Furthermore, the costs of promotion should not be transferred to the consumer, especially when these promotions more often than not result in a profit for the production company.

      You assume that supply remains constant while aggregate demand increases, and I do not believe this is so. In this situation, demand and supply have both increased. The capability to produce more CDs at a lower cost exists now, if we ignore secondary production costs, producing a classical increase in supply. In addition, CDs have become more mainstream increasing demand. If demand has increased at a rate greater than supply then one would expect a heightened equilibrium price. If demand has increased at a rate that is less than that of supply then the market clearing price should be lower. If both have increased equally, then the price should be equal to the price back in 1983, when adjusted for inflation.

      There are only five siutations in which equilibrium cost would increase. Either supply and demand increase, with demand increasing more quickly than supply, demand increases and supply remains constant, demand increases but supply decreases, demand remains constant but supply decreases, or demand and supply both decrease, but supply at a greater rate. Only the first of these situations is plausible, but to prove it either way is beyond me. It is my opinion that supply has increased more than demand, but I can not prove this.

      --
      Pax Digitalia
    2. Re:Expensive music videos by caca_phony · · Score: 1

      Music production is a labor-intensive industry, and the cost of employing songwriters, vocalists, musicians, and recording engineers has not gone down.
      Neither has the cost of a secretary or a paid intern. Do you really think that is what your entertanment consumption pays for? Your entertainment buck pays for lawyers, agents, accountants and PR, more than anything else. Wanting to be a musician or songwriter as a career is about as safe a plan as is planning a career in professional sports. You might as well become a bum who plays the horses with the success rate of that career plan.

      --
      ...and this lie crawls out of its mouth: 'I, the state, am the people.'
  151. Eminem vs. old blues by jcsehak · · Score: 2

    Skip James (Robert Johnson did this too):
    "If I send for my baby, and she don't come
    All the doctors in Wisconson sure can't help her none"

    "I would rather be dead and in some cypress grove
    than to have a woman I can't control"

    Robert Johnson:
    "Me and the Devil was walking side by side
    I'm gonna beat my woman until I'm satisfied"

    Mississippi John Hurt:
    "Some these morning's gonna wake up crazy
    gonna grab a gun, kill my baby, nobody's business but mine"

    "Frankie shot Albert, shot him two of three times
    said 'stand back, I's smoking my gun, let me see my Albert dyin'
    He's my man, but he done me wrong"

    The list goes on. Granted, these are taken out of context, but so are Eminem's lyrics.

    The blues was america's first exclusive music form. Along with it came country, and after it jazz. Today, we have rap. In a way, liking Eminem is being patriotic.

    While the blues are simply great tunes with appropriate words, Eminem has the preternatural ability to rhyme almost every goddam word in every line and still make it flow as if he's just talking straight. To really appreciate it, just try it yourself. It's really unbelievable. Just thought I'd add to your point.

    --

    c-hack.com |
    1. Re:Eminem vs. old blues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Today, we have rap. In a way, liking Eminem is being patriotic.

      Thank god I'm not american!

  152. Re:But this will actually boost record sales, righ by $0+31337 · · Score: 0

    So as long as millions of people all "copy" the CD from the same person it's ok?

  153. Cocaine Blues by ahfoo · · Score: 2

    And besided, Fulsom Prison Blues is nothing compared to Cocaine Blues.
    Early one morning while making my rounds,
    I took a shot of cocaine
    And I shot my woman down!
    (Sung with gusto like a work song)
    As far as I'm concerned when you use the word "shoot" with cocaine in the same clause, you're talking about shooting up coke with an IV needle which is way hardcore krazy kowboy stuff compared to smokin' crack. You don't have to hit a vein to smoke some crack and nothing hits the blood stream with quite the same tidal wave rush as a full syringe of coke. (At least that's what William Burroughs said, I certainly wouldn't know.)
    While shooting up coke is a wild time, shooting your girl after you slam down a hit is definitely the razor's edge and must have been a helluva rush. Of course Slim Shady might have tortured her first, but Johnny was clearly selling the hardcore image if you get into some of the more obscure stuff.

  154. Re:A good test case for the 'Marketability' of pir by dangermouse · · Score: 2
    Call me old-fashioned, but hearing a near-perfect copy of an album I like makes me add it to the list of CDs to look for the next time I go to my local record shop. Literally... I maintain a sorted list.

    Part of it is the packaging (album art, liner notes, etc), part of it is a desire to support the artist, part is owning an "original" copy from which "near-perfect" copies can be made endlessly and at will, and part of it is really that a rack full of CDs is just cool.

    I buy the disc, rip it to mp3, burn a duplicate, and shelve the "original". The duplicate gets played when I don't have a computer handy-- when I 'm in the car or out walking around-- and otherwise I listen to the mp3s. The mp3s I'd downloaded get tossed, mostly because it's easier to just rip a disc with iTunes than it is to re-tag and organize a bunch of junk I skimmed off the net.

    Incidentally, my record budget has grown dangerously since the advent of good music-swapping systems and the proliferation of internet radio; I just find more stuff I didn't know about and that I like. I think I'm averaging a disc a week now, compared to a disc every 4-6 weeks just a couple of years ago. Almost every CD I buy now is something I've already heard in mp3s someone gave me or caught on a stream; the remainder are other albums by those artists. MTV and commercial radio never did a damn thing for me or my music purchasing habits, except perhaps cause me to cringe and lament the state of music in general.

  155. Preordered? Looking forward to hearing it? by EvilAlien · · Score: 2
    You liar.

    You bold-faced liar.

    You've heard it, you liked it, you even managed to get the mp3s in high-quality, cd quality even. You've probably already burnt it to cd audio for listen in your only stereo that won't play mp3s.

    --
    perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
  156. Credit where due... by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    Oh, come on... It can't be all bad... After all, how many sites have phrases like:
    "Did I mention HOW MUCH ASS ELO KICKS? Fucking metric tons of it! So big it has to be measured in parsecs!"

    After that, it kind of rambles into stupidity, but it was good while it lasted. And the .tar format. Uuuugh... I'm feeling queezy....

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  157. Re:A good test case for the 'Marketability' of pir by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I've noticed that most mp3 rips have pretty crappy bass, when we're talking about bass-heave music like rap. Also most kinds of digital distortion become re-distorted by mp3. So for something like a rap album, I want the CD. Or a medium-high quality VBRE rip, which is not generally forthcoming.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  158. Am I the only one... by slycer9 · · Score: 0

    ..who sees this as a possible plant by RIAA execs themselves? They knew how highly anticipated this release was, they knew, in this day and age, if copies hit the net they'd be traded far and wide, they knew this would be the perfect way to say, "see! Piracy! this must stop!". Sort of seems like we may be playing into their hands doesn't it?

    --
    Don't park drunk, accidents cause people.
  159. Different Release Dates by grahammm · · Score: 1

    I don't know if it is the case here (I don't like Rap), but do not forget that albums are released at different times in different countries. So while it may not have been released in the uSA it might have been released somewhere else. The news media must not forget that CBBD, freedb etc are international.

  160. EMINEM hates us geeks by SilentJames · · Score: 1

    On MTV he was quoted as saying, in regards to file sharing, "fucking geeks! Get a fucking life." Now i know hes all "contreversal" (note the sarcasim) and supposed to be a dick but now hes attacking us. But, actually, fear not fellow geeks. For you see - he doesnt mean "geek" like that. he means "geek" like being stripped of your manhood, like having your OSX taken away and being forced to run Win 3.1 for the rest of your life. bottom line Marshall, Slim, EM - whatever bites it makes me sad to think that hes number 2. i d rather have Boy bands again.

    1. Re:EMINEM hates us geeks by damiam · · Score: 1

      Don't feel bad. Eminem hates everyone else too.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  161. Is US Police Actually "Fighting" Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    The Friday before the Eminem album's long-awaited release, a busy street corner in New York was dotted with bootleggers' card tables and blankets, each strewn with pirated copies of CDs and movies for sale.


    Reminds me of the streets of Estonias(near Russia) streets. And the markets they used to have for selling all that warez. But they've cleaned up a bit, but NY hasn't? Strikes me a bit odd..

  162. Re:A good test case for the 'Marketability' of pir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have 3 svcd version from centropy group. I saw it in theaters before i downloaded it. thought it was great.

  163. Re:Inflation and longer albums make up the differe by WalterSobchak · · Score: 1

    When I compare prices of software (e.g. our own products) over time, prices have gone down, way down. Sometimes to the point of $0.

    Also I think that neither the change in hardware prices exceeds the rate of inflation. Until proven otherwise, I just think the music industry are greedy. Period.

    Alex

    --
    Absinthe makes the heart grow fonder
  164. Release Date was Sunday (May 28th)... by Spaceman7 · · Score: 1
    due to its availability on the internet, and Eminem's whining. The original announcement from billboard is here. This breaks the usual trend of CDs being released on Tuesdays.

    And, even though everyone in the industry seems to be complaining about how bootleg copies of his CD are hurting sales, early predictions will still put him on top of this week's Billboard 200 with over 300,000 albums sold. And since SoundScan tallies sales from Monday thru Sunday, this CD has only one legitimate day of sales to reach that level (minus the usual street date violations -- the album has been in the hands of the record stores since at least last Friday). This article focuses on some early sales reports.

  165. how eminem comes across by greay · · Score: 1

    listen to his new album in its entirety; listen to what he's actually saying, and then reconsider yr position.

    Eminem's an actor, of sorts. There's a huge difference between the character who's singing (whom I guess would be "Slim Shady") and whatever his real name is. A huge bulk of the content is actually in reference to that.

    Now, I agree. The image, I don't like myself. The first time I listened to the album, there were a number of points where that really started to bother me. But then I started listening more, and the more thoughtful, less just-out-to-shock parts came through, and the switching back and forth between the two is what's really interesting in his work.

    1. Re:how eminem comes across by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      The whole Slim Shady/Eminem/Marshal Mathers thing is just a poke at multiple personality disorders. Those in themselves are not very funny, but the acting and jokes are played off very well, which in effect makes the whole thing halarious.

      The guy is a great actor, and a great freestylist. His humor can be dry and rude, but that is what makes it so fun to listen to.

  166. Re:A good test case for the 'Marketability' of pir by Vliam · · Score: 1

    If you ask me, the music executives have noone to blame but themselves for the current situation. They conned the majority of american consumers into believing that cds were far superior to vinyl media (lies). I hindsight, this was a very short-sighted attempt at turning a fast buck by creating obsolescence in an otherwise permanent product. Then, through price fixing they have steadily increased prices while production costs have declined.
    I do believe that piracy hurts the poor record companies. When the public has an opportunity to sample a product in whole, they can make an informed purchase if they chose. If most of the albums produced today weren't crammed with filler material, I imagine sales would not be declining at the current rate. Don't forget, these same companies have stated on many occasions that they would like to abandon the singles market and force consumers to purchase the full priced product.

  167. Isn't Gracenote owned buy Amazon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go figure.

  168. There's a world outside the US? by chiark · · Score: 3, Informative

    This was officially released in the UK, and probably sizable chunks of the world, on Monday 27th May.

    This ain't piracy, it's the world :-)

  169. Re:A good test case for the 'Marketability' of pir by MuMart · · Score: 1

    Back in the seventies I'm told record companies dropped the price of records and added all sorts of goodies like concert vouchers and posters to discourage taping.

    What do you get today to discourage "piracy"? Crappy postage-stamp sized sleeve notes, a disc that probably costs twice as much ....

    It's all stick and no carrot.

  170. Not for sale??? by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1

    I saw it for sale in HMV in Brisol, UK on Sunday.

    --
    You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
  171. Re:had it for a week or two by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    several other songs from the new album off of kazaa but all that they contained were the looping chorus.

    So that explains it. I wasn't going to buy it after hearing nothing but looping chorus tracks. I figured he flipped out or something and was trying to do some weird artistic shit on us. "Will these guys still buy 5 minutes of looping chorus on every track?" Hmm, if he put that out there to screw with people then I definitely won't buy it now. I don't buy any music until I can playtest it off of a P2P network first. If I like it I'll go out and buy the whole CD. So far I haven't heard any of Eminem's new songs except for the looping chorus and it only proved to piss me off.

  172. What happened to MP3? by Hylander · · Score: 1

    Yeah right.

    So these users are ripping the album off by *BURNING NEW COPIES OF IT ONTO CD*.

    Doesn't that sound fishy to anyone?

  173. The reasons behind the --- Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The reason Gracenote (former CDDB) gets bad press around here.. internet history lesson:

    Gracenote effectively used, abused, lied to, stole, infringed, ..whatever you want to call it, the communities good will. Everybody typed in their CD titles, building up the free and open database, for the benefit of everybody, into CDDB. The database reached critical mass. MP3 rippers, CD players, winamp, everyone else incorporates it into their music programs to auto-recognize an inserted CD.

    All is good. The people are happy.

    Then CDDB becomes self aware. Of the value of what they have. First they get cocky. 'If you want to use CDDB, you must display our graphics and logo in your program.' Maybe justified, they're paying for all the bandwidth after all. Wankery though.

    Developers start to grumble.

    CDDB sells out. The database is closed. Automated(bot)-retrieval is blocked. All your CD info are belong to us. Thanks for sending us all the data!
    "The Intellectual Property IS OURS NOW, developers, PAY"

    Start dicking people around. Gracenote is born.
    Business model: extort developers already hooked into using the service, and sell the query stats. (welcome to phase 2.1: kiss up to tomorrow's customers [ie RIAA])

    back to the history lesson though..
    Developers pissed off. Volunteers are MAD.
    So what do they do about it, aside from moan on slashdot? They take the last known Free mirror of the database, and freedb.org is born! And they take the opportunity to do things a bit better the second time. Works as a drop in replacement to CDDB. The more flexible (read: open source) players dump CDDB like an annoying date, some of the more 'market aware' stick with CDDB for 'interface stability' reasons, but all(?) add the capability for the user to use FreeDB.org instead.

    FreeDB.org takes a little time to catch up, but with the mass defection of those in-the-know, it does just fine, thank you, in no time.
    It stands today as a testament to those brave coders, and one of the cooler projects on the net.

    => Just search for 'CDDB' or 'Gracenote' in the slashdot search box for the whole ugly history.
    I'll let the results of that search speak for itself...

    It started out as a wonderful thing, turned to shit. Greed'll kill us all if we let it..
    RMS was right. Again. (that's a hint)

    long live freedb.org.

    [or something very close to this actually transpired..]

    1. Re:The reasons behind the --- Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He probably would have gotten modded up if it wasn't for the RMS comment.

  174. Re:Inflation and longer albums make up the differe by zbuffered · · Score: 2

    Good point. I can buy an old movie on DVD for ten bucks, because it was released a long time ago, the number of people willing to buy it have decreased, so the price goes down to try to get more people to buy it. Meanwhile, the price of a new CD is often less than that of an old CD. I should be able to get Nirvana's Nevermind for less than a newly released CD, but it works the other way around. The new CDs go on sale, and everything else is more expensive.
    Maybe they have a good reason for this, but what could it be?
    I guess it drives people to buy new music and forget old music, but why would they want to do this? Support new artists? Why, when they can make money off of existing artists?
    The distribution costs of sending someone an MP3 are near zero. I should be able to buy an old CD in MP3 format off the web for three bucks. The artist already made most of the money they were going to make, and I'd be likely to buy more at $3/CD than at $15/CD. I understand that new artists need to make money, and that they wouldn't be making as much at $3/CD, so why not release old music in MP3 format and only sell CDs for the newer music. People would still buy them, even if their only use would be to rip the CD to MP3 and store the CD in a cool, dry place.

    It would be exactly like hardcover books, gaming consoles, and other new tech. Get the early adopters to pay more at first, then lower the price later to get more people to buy it.

    --
    Synergy is your friend
  175. Piracy??? by crow_t_robot · · Score: 0

    Piracy??? I bought my copy at Best Buy last weekend. Best Buy had them sitting out in a cart getting ready to put them out with a display and everyone was grabbing them up and they were selling them.

  176. Uh huh... by RiotXIX · · Score: 1

    It's annoying how things have to supported by respectable names to be considered good by the ignorant. If you've never read or heard his more decent lyrics, have a look at something like this (http://www.eminemworld.com/lyrics/sslp4.shtml), or pretty much anything on his first album. Considering Oxford did a few lectures on him, and the right wing journal The Spectator praised him, and the fact that he did grow up in poverty, I'd hardly call the man 'a hack', although I would agree however, that he's gotten pretty close to it in his later years. I'm anxious to hear this album, because we'll see if he still writes about things that matter to some people (young children being poor, being raised by terrible parents and bad society around them), or whether he's found a niche as a stereotypical modern rapper singing about cars and money and vulgarity.

    --
    "You know you don't act like a scientist, you're more like a game show host." Dana Barret
  177. Downloaded, burned, and then bought. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I downloaded an *almost* perfect copy (I say almost, because I don't want the Audiophile Nazis hijacking my post), and have been listening to it for a week or so. Today, I will buy the retail version. Thus ends my boycott of the RIAA and the MPAA. If it weren't for piracy, I would have never heard any of these songs (I don't listen to Hip Hop radio).

    I will keep the MP3 version in my 200+ GB collection, and keep the CD on the shelf.

    -AC

  178. Now there are logs by shawnmelliott · · Score: 2

    Think about the Gracenote server logs. Wouldn't they be logging the transactions and information requests.

    I recall, way back when, when I was looking at CDDB that you had up to 1000 free checks with your application before they would want to charge you for the use of the service.

    Add in the fact that they KNOW that the CD is one of the top requests... So if you put 2 + 2 together they HAVE logs with IP's of those PEOPLE that have a pirated copy

  179. Re:A good test case for the 'Marketability' of pir by John+Ineson · · Score: 1

    >They increase the price of new music in order to make up for supposed piracy, which in turn makes
    >people more likely to pirate. Its a catch22 of the WORSE kind.

    No, this is a vicious circle. A 'catch 22' is different, that's a no win situation.

    Whereas this problem is very easy to solve -- as soon as the music industry (including retailers) stops taking the piss, and charges fair prices, everybody will win. An audio CD, including case and printed material, costs about 50 cents. Duhh, hello, where's the rest going? Greedy, fat pigs, with an oligopoly on the market, that's where.

    Cut the prices and the problem goes away. Who on earth would go through all the hassle of tracking down and downloading an inferior electronic version if you could buy a CD for 5 dollars/pounds a time? Yeah, there would be a few skinflints, sure, but the vast majority of people would go back to buying CDs, and will buy more than ever.

    Unfortunately aforementioned greedy, fat pigs running the show can't see the answer, because wherever they look, their vision is obscured by enormous piles of money. We call this market failure. This is when governments are supposed to intervene. Except the politicians are all too busy taking brib^W donations from the RIAA...

  180. Re:Inflation and longer albums make up the differe by UberLame · · Score: 1

    I can't remeber ever seeing a CD that was 70
    minutes long, except for mix CDs.

    The last CD I saw that was over 60 minutes long was a Greatfull Dead Jam CD (official, not bootlegged, unfortunately). Even 50minutes isn't really all that common. Most CDs seem to be 40-50 minuts with about as many being only 30 minutes as there are 50+ minute discs.

    --
    I'm a loser baby, so why don't you kill me.
  181. Re:Anybody notice? by Basje · · Score: 1

    Come on... Do you really believe those statistics? You mean, they are for real? Not rigged in any way to favor a recordcompany paying money?

    To me it's just another scam. Another rigged poll. Anyone knows that most charts are rigged to boost sales, improve airtime and such. Gheesh.

    --
    the pun is mightier than the sword
  182. Re:Inflation and longer albums make up the differe by Gleef · · Score: 2

    yerricde wrote:

    1. Longer albums. Back in the day, when vinyl was king, 35 minutes was considered an album; nowadays, CD albums average 70 minutes.

    Double albums were quite common (at least among the artists I listen to, and many artists would put extra tracks on their cassette releases because they wanted to get the music out and it wouldn't fit on the vinyl.

    Yes, CD albums are probably longer on average than Vinyl albums were (Vinyl you could get about 18 minutes per side / 36 total before having to make sound quality compromises), but I question your "70 minutes" figure for the average CD albums. The longest many CD players can handle is 74 minutes, and most albums are far from full. My guess is the average new music CD is about 45 minutes (not counting compilation or "Best of" CD's, where it's trivial to just add tracks until it's full).

    2. Inflation. CDs cost USD 17 now, but $17 in AD2002 dollars is worth about $9 in AD1983 dollars (when CDs were first released).

    According to the CPI, $17 in 2001 money (USD) is $9.65 in 1983 dollars. I don't think there are formal figures for 2002 yet, but your figure sounds plausible.

    The thing is, how many people were buying CD's in 1983? CD sales didn't pass Vinyl sales until 1988 ($11.36). CD's didn't become the dominant form of music sales until they passed the cassette in 1992, and $17 in 2001 was $13.61 then (in terms of sales, cassettes were king from 1983 to 1992). As I recall, CDs themselves often sold for $9.95 in 1992 (because they were still competing with cassettes). We're talking about much more than just inflation here.

    I don't have figures onhand, but my understanding is that CD production costs have dropped to the point where they are considerably cheaper to produce than cassettes (and have been for a while), yet the cassette version is sold for less than the CD of the same album. We're definately talking about much more than inflation here, and more than "longer albums".

    --

    ----
    Open mind, insert foot.
  183. Re:But this will actually boost record sales, righ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only if you don't consider millions of people mass public distribution. Did you even read the post you were replying to?

  184. Why people buy stuff the could get for free. by stackdump · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that, while I am embarrassed to say that I only own 2 cd's(dont really have a reason why, im 21 its not like i didt have time), that people who actually buy cd's now, either are *real* fans of the artists and like to have *real* copies of their(the artists') work as proof.

    The same would go for the purchase of DVD's (Lately it seems that the tv news world is finally catching on to movie piracy. ireallywouldlikeALLtheIndianaJonesMoviesonDVD!!) And also books for that matter. Every William Gibson novel ever concieved(iassume) is available in some electronic form on the net for free courtesy of some cyborgloving netfanatic, so unless you are anti-ebook or have a paper fetish you could have all the books for free( i would have bought them in e-format if i could).

    So to actually *own* a copy of any artistic work, it seems to me, is more of a statement of preference by the owner than merely a means of obtaining a copy of the work.

    Does anyone see this trend continuing?(ithinkso)

  185. Re:But this will actually boost record sales, righ by $0+31337 · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I actually did bother to read it. I'm just wondering who determines when it goes from copying to mass public distribution. 10 copies? 20 copies? 1000 copies?

  186. sp why doesn't gracenote by geekoid · · Score: 2

    track the IP address of people requesting album information before the album was released?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  187. Re:A good test case for the 'Marketability' of pir by Dirtside · · Score: 2

    Thanks for missing the point entirely. The point is that it was unfair competition to force competitors out of business by lowering prices so ridiculously. There's this little thing called "ethics", and the aforementioned theater manager seems to lack them. In our society, it's generally considered a bad thing to support unethical behavior.

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  188. No, it works *exactly* like that. by Otto · · Score: 2

    This would make a lot more sense than some story about how if you get all the mp3s and assemble them in the right order and burn to CD it still is recognised as the original.

    But that does work. Works very well, in fact.

    One of the ways the freedb/cddb protocol recognizes a CD is a hash of the track timings. Like track 1= 1:30.57, track 2= 1:45.13, etc..

    You take these, run them thru an algorithim, and get a number out. Then fuzzy search for the number. It works. Very well. The algorithim works in a way that compensates for minor differences. And really, all it takes is for someone else to have the same MP3s that you do. The *vast* majority of albums in these databases is not CD's inserted into a drive, it's a folder full of MP3's.

    There's even MP3 tagging programs that will let you do a freedb/cddb search on a folder full of MP3's. "Tag and Rename" is one of them that comes to mind. So if you have a folder with all the songs from an album in it, then all you have to do is put them in the right order and hit the freedb query button to get the tracknames and so on.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  189. Stores sold early by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.canoe.ca/JamMusic/may29_chartstory-can. html

    It seems stores started selling early so there may not be as much piracy as this stat would seem to indicate.

  190. Re:A good test case for the 'Marketability' of pir by cancrman · · Score: 2

    Ditto man.

    I was going through my CDs the other day and realized that I had purchased a full third of them (~200) because I had been exposed to the music on the internet first.

    The only thing that is a pain in the ass is ripping my old discs. I'm only up to the "Gs" as of right now.

    --
    The sole purpose of the Internet is to get porn and bomb making plans into the hands of children.
  191. NEWSFLASH - record store slashdotted by eracerblue · · Score: 1

    Thousands of record stores across the country shut down!

    Unexpectedly, millions of geeks rioted outside thousands of record stores across the country. Relentlessly, these "nerds" threw themselves at the doors and windows, even after the power was out and doors were locked.

    When asked to comment, most of the so-called geeks claimed seeing a story on a website called "Slashdot". Others still said they heard about it on the "Gracenote" website. "I just couldn't resist. I had to come down and buy the new Eminem album."

    Hours later, after the stores were still closed, people were walking away talking about how the store was "Slashdotted". What this means, we may never know.

  192. This makes sense by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    Most of the "voodoo" in MP3 is in the encoder. The encoder is where differences in programming will result in major differences in the sound of the MP3 file.

    I think decoders have little leeway, if any, to play with. So the same MP3 will lead to the same WAV file, probably independent of the decoder.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  193. sex pistols hit number 1 WITHOUT making the charts by KunstCleaver · · Score: 1

    in 1977 the sex pistols did a similar thing, with their single 'god save the queen' being the number one record in the land without it being listed on the charts:
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article /0,4273,4 416451,00.html

    --
    "The direction controls are the same in Nethack as they are in vi." "Yeah, I hardly ever die in vi anymore."
  194. Re:A good test case for the 'Marketability' of pir by HydroCarbon10 · · Score: 2

    Not in a small town where corporate america/the wealthy own the place. Example: Our poor schools are falling apart and have yet to be placed in low speed 'school zones' while our private school have long been augmented with bright flashing lights to warn everyone of the impending school zone...despite the fact that no one walks to those schools.

    The people who try to change things get slapped around by the local newspaper^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H tabloid.

    --
    The best way to accelerate a windows box is at 9.8 meters per second square.
  195. Touché by Zen+Mastuh · · Score: 1

    Okay HAL, it looks like we forgot to program you for humor.

    --
    "What is the sound of one belly slapping?"
  196. Totally ot rant by Bnonn · · Score: 1
    Dumb enough? No.

    Wishful enough? Yes.

    As you can see, I wasn't expressing any kind of surprise at the fact Eminem is revered. I was merely asking (rhetorically) what kind of fuc^H^H^Hscrewed up society we live in that this is the case. You caught me at a bad time now; I just got home from Tech, where it has become blindingly obvious that not only are the best and brightest future journalists nearly all illiterate, but they also lack any kind of critical thinking capability or even the desire to think about anything that seems vaguely "intellectual". When you see people who are going to be working in the media and possibly in positions of influence struggling with concepts like Marxism, ideology and semiotics, and wondering what is the point of studying them...

    I'm deeply depressed at how totally wasted the incredible potential of humanity is. We are capable of such great things, yet probably less than 1% of our entire population is even interested in anything beyond how to be "better" than anyone else through meaningless material wealth and social status. Everyone searches for some way to be happy, following the media in a desperate consumerist belief of more is better; never appearing to realise that happiness will always be deferred and never noticing that their entire lives have been spent searching for something they already have.

    People tell me I think too much. I tell them they think too little.

  197. In other news... by Deziex · · Score: 1

    "The Eminem Show" got ripped a new one on the NPR program "Fresh Air" today.

    And a lot of what the reviewer said was right, say I.

    !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "RANT"//EN"
    Eminem uses too much self-pity. He thinks everyone hates him. He's alos stupid-he called his duet of "Stan" with Elton John 'russian roulette for his career'. Not so, but he continues to rap shit like that any way. Too bad for him-his little ramblin's are somewhat entertaining, on a sophomoric level, but overall just stupid.

    --
    Never pet a burning dog.