Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Freon

Veramocor writes "MSNBC.com has an article posted from the WSJ about MS's new plan for living room domination, codenamed Freon. Freon will be capable of 'playing games but also offering television capabilities, such as pausing live TV and recording shows onto a computer hard drive.' The article then goes on to explain future potential business plans for XBox incarnations. The system does seem to have some great advantages. I must question their naming question however, we all know what a disaster the actual chemical Freon was. Here's to hoping, Cheers!" We mentioned the Xbox's planned evolution the other day, too, but without the fancy codename.

419 comments

  1. what about the environment? by pcardoso · · Score: 1, Funny

    If freon contains CFCs and eats up the ozone layer, what will MS Freon do?

    Destroy all my linux distribution CDs?

    1. Re:what about the environment? by haeger · · Score: 4, Funny

      If freon contains CFCs and eats up the ozone layer, what will MS Freon do?

      It'll contain CRC's and eat up your freedom to choose?

      .haeger

      --
      You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. -- Harlan Ellison
    2. Re:what about the environment? by Joseph+Lam · · Score: 0, Troll

      MS Freon contains BUGs that suck up people's ass

    3. Re:what about the environment? by byran+lei · · Score: 0

      >It'll contain CRC's and eat up your freedom to choose?
      >.haeger
      >
      >
      Does this mean the that the green "X" Xbox logo will be replaced with the Biohazard symbol?

    4. Re:what about the environment? by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

      I'll bet you're snickering about your cleverness!

      --
      I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    5. Re:what about the environment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your're right, I am.

    6. Re:what about the environment? by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

      Edsel, Pinto and The Hindenburg were alternate names not chosen.

    7. Re:what about the environment? by leomekenkamp · · Score: 1

      And probably cause BSORBs (Blue Skies Of Radiation Burns).

      --
      Wenn ist das Nunstueck git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput.
    8. Re:what about the environment? by xmedar · · Score: 1

      Well it was originally going to be called MS HotAir(tm), but the spinmeisters at M$ HQ didnt like that, to give an example from the article -

      The Xbox console isn't profitable for the Redmond, Wash., company and its costs are believed to be higher than Sony's, partly because of the hard drive and a version of its powerful Windows operating system included with each machine. While the Xbox is a full-feature BMW, the PS2 is a Toyota says Bruno Bonnell, chairman and chief executive of French game maker Infogrames Entertainment SA.


      Note that there is an implicit assumption that Windows is a powerful operating system andtherefore we should all be willing to pay more for it. I thought the XBox was more expensive because M$ built uneconomic hardware that doesnt sell as well as the competition and they need to heavily subsidise so that people will buy it? Plus some quote from a M$ crony doesnt mean squat. So much for that puff piece... NEXT!

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
    9. Re:what about the environment? by AlgUSF · · Score: 1

      It will contain BSOD's and eat up your bank account of course...

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    10. Re:what about the environment? by matrix29 · · Score: 2

      If freon contains CFCs and eats up the ozone layer, what will MS Freon do?

      Destroy all my linux distribution CDs?


      Contain all of the suckiness of ULTIMATE TV boxes (which will be cannibalized for this project), the "Green/Blue Screen of Death" of ALL MICROSOFT CRAPWARE, the Megalomaniacal desires of the Uber-Spoiled-Rich-Boy-Nerd, a Fast-Forward "Commercial Skip" button which will be advertised to death until it is revoked in Version 2.00001 (one day after release) so Billy Gates can suck up more advertising dollars from obnoxious marketing drones, zero of the features promised working correctly, billions of lines of mega-patched (never rewritten) buggy spaghetti code, a ticket price of $500, a monthly user fee of $19.95 so you can actually use the crapware's "Program Guide" (failure to pay will result in disabling of all features until payment is received), and an internal (overpriced) cellphone so Gates can update your guide & spy on your viewing habits & disable people smart enough to hack out the MS-Crapware(TM)+ Report them to the BSA + DMCA goonsquad.

      I figure a 33% sales rate nationwide as that was the percentage last election that was moronic enough to vote for a Drug-Addict Son-Of-A-Bush who's lifetime incompetence, corruption, and treason is sadly obvious to most every thinking American (except that hardcore moron-base of 33%).

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
  2. Feature Creep by Gopher971 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Quote "I worry about what I call feature creep -- layering too many things into a product so the original intent of the product gets lost,"

    And I thought they were talking about Windows!

    --
    Just you're average nitpicker.
    1. Re:Feature Creep by cAPT_aARGH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If MS does get the online gaming going, one of the new "features" of your XBox will possibly be a virus since they use a "modular" Windows and a hard drive. Won't that do wonders to their track record? Since I don't know for sure, is the xbox system operated from the hard drive or from a chip?

    2. Re:Feature Creep by Transient0 · · Score: 0

      I thought Bill Gates was the Feature Creep of this article...

      score one for ambiguous reporting.

    3. Re:Feature Creep by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      This is /., right? I thought Bill Gates was the featured creep in this story. :)

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    4. Re:Feature Creep by MyHair · · Score: 1

      "I worry about what I call feature creep [. . .]"

      And I thought they were talking about Windows!


      Or Office. I think "feature creep" just became my new favorite nickname for Clippy and friends. :-)

    5. Re:Feature Creep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have seen it, nothing special...bleh

      I have a PC with a ATI AIW Radeon that does everything that "freon" is supposed to be. And it's running 2K not XP! bleh

      F R E E S T Y L E

  3. Freon? by PacoTaco · · Score: 3, Funny

    This proves that Microsoft wants to take over your refrigerator as well.

    1. Re:Freon? by Thatmushroom · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey, don't knock that idea. They've been running mine for the past 3 months. Whenever it crashes, it's usually up in a few minutes, and most of the time the meat isn't spoiled.

      I draw the line at having them run my liquor cabinent, though. That's one thing I never want to lock up.

      --
      You zap the moderators with a wand of humor! The moderators resist!
    2. Re:Freon? by Joseph+Lam · · Score: 4, Funny

      RTFM: "click the Windows Update item under the Start Menu once a week to keep your refrigerator up and running"

      Don't you hate the EULA sticker saying "By opening this refrigerator door you ......"

    3. Re:Freon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, i have banned M$FT products from my home, i think Bill Gates is the devil...

    4. Re:Freon? by Toraz+Chryx · · Score: 2

      Bill Gates isn't the devil, Al Pacino is.

    5. Re:Freon? by Charm · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I thought they banned Freon

      Freon Banned

      Microsoft not just content with control they need to destroy the whole freezin planet as well.

      --
      -- RTFM:Slackware::Beer:Saturday
    6. Re:Freon? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Al Pacino isn't the devil, Ned Flanders is. Al Pacino is just a terrible actor who most people apparently thinks is great, star as he is of apallingly bad films like Scarface (nothing so much as a bad episode of Miami Vice). The sooner the Pacino myth is shattered, the safer we'll all be from abominations like "Scent of a Woman" SHUDDER

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    7. Re:Freon? by antek9 · · Score: 1

      Well, does this mean you can Snow Crash (tm) that thing? Bill Gates as Hiro Protagonist and Linus Thorvalds as Raven? Not likely, methinks...

      --
      A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
      Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
    8. Re:Freon? by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      You won't believe the EULA which the latest Auto Update put on my MS refrigerator.

      I didn't know there were magnetic letters so small.

    9. Re:Freon? by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
      They're playing off the word "Free". In real-speak, not DoubleSpeak, it should be called "SlaveOn," "StuckOn," "AutomatOn."

      Microsoft not only dreams but is attempting to implement its vision of complete domination of the home, internet, and enterprise. What a reach! What an arrogance!

      Thankfully, it won't work. Right?

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    10. Re:Freon? by MyHair · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "click the Windows Update item under the Start Menu once a week to keep your refrigerator up and running"

      You're not taking this quite far enough:

      Toaster: Please enter your Passport (TM) Login
      (...)
      Welcome, Jim! How do you want your toast today?

      Me: (Selects light brown)

      Toaster: Thank you, Jim! . . .
      Jim, I'm sorry, but your XBox gaming subscription is two days late. I will be unable to prepare your toast until your account is in order. Choose an account to pay this from:
      A) Checking
      B) Savings
      C) IRA withdrawal (early penalties apply)
      D) Open a Microsoft(TM) World bank credit account! Jim, this is quick and easy, and the interest is only 42% APR. You won't pay anything for the first month, and all your home Microsoft appliances will automatically deduct their usage fees from this account!

      Me: (Selecting A)

      Toaster: . . .
      Thank you! (. . .)
      Jim! Please click here to update to Microsoft(TM) Toast 3.4c! For only a nominal increase in rental fee, this required upgrade (refer to your EULA), you get the added capability of Microsoft(TM) YummyToast, in which the EULA allows you to add cinnamon and sugar or a fruit spread instead (MS(TM) Refrigerator also requires upgrade for EULA to allow these items in Microsoft(TM) HomeNecessities); this is a vast improvement over last year's NumNumToast with butter, Microsoft(TM) "I can't believe I ever used anything else besides Microsoft VeggieTales vegetable oil spread!" or cream cheese.

      Me: (Throws toaster accross room.)

      Security System: Jim! I see your toaster is in need of service! I'll have your Microsoft(TM) MediaPhone dial support immediately! (Connection charges apply. Average hold time: 3 hours. Estimated time to technician visit: two weeks.)

      (Feel free to continue this story. -Jim)

    11. Re:Freon? by cefek · · Score: 1

      "Honey, come back to bed, darling. You was supposed to turn of the light, not play Mineswepper on our new switch"

      --
      Plain old sigh.
    12. Re:Freon? by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 1

      That would be nice to get the updated "Fat ass" program. where everytime your fat ass tries to get some fatening food the fridge calls you names. Like "MOO, thats it you fat ass keep eating.. huh there tubby did you hear me?"

    13. Re:Freon? by einhverfr · · Score: 2

      And I thought PostgreSQL had a monopoly on TOAST support ;)

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    14. Re:Freon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whew. I thought for a minute that they said "Kreon". That is the name I picked for a directory where I keep all my HTML files. No one but me knows or cares. (Wooops, I just let the cat out of the bag). Well, ok, if Microsoft is watching, how about me selling you the rights to use my personal directory name, instead of that silly "Freon"? lemme know...

    15. Re:Freon? by Bush+Pig · · Score: 0

      I think you got that the wrong way round.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    16. Re:Freon? by zCyl · · Score: 2

      and most of the time the meat isn't spoiled.

      But if it's closed-source meat, how do you ever really know??

  4. A step in the right direction by maunleon · · Score: 0, Troll

    This would take the X-box one step closer to a place on my entertainment shelf.

    What I would like to do ideally is to take my whole DVD collection and copy it to a hard drive. Then, I would like to have the X-box (Freon, whatever) come up with a menu and let me select one of the movies on its hard drive.

    There are of course copyright issues with this (what keeps me from going to blockbuster, and conveniently backing up my rental to this box?).. but they can be worked around.

    Anyone know if the X-box can be modified to do this yet?

    p.s. Freon was not such a disaster. I'd have loved to have an exclusive patent to Freon for a few years.

    1. Re:A step in the right direction by Joseph+Lam · · Score: 1

      with a broadband connectivity and its (very likely) real-time mpeg encoding power, and if it does dominate the living rooms, we'll then have millions of online (pRoN) video servers...is this just what Bill Gate want to see?

    2. Re:A step in the right direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > There are of course copyright issues with this (what keeps me from going to blockbuster, and [...]

      Micro$oft & DMCA

    3. Re:A step in the right direction by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      " This would take the X-box one step closer to a place on my entertainment shelf"

      What difference does one step make when it's a million miles away?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    4. Re:A step in the right direction by mother+pussbucket · · Score: 1

      And here's another step:

      http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns9 99 92483

      To dredge up an old sig-line: Where do you want to go, toady?

      --
      Yes, it's true. This man has no dick.
    5. Re:A step in the right direction by arivanov · · Score: 2
      p.s. Freon was not such a disaster. I'd have loved to have an exclusive patent to Freon for a few years

      It was an environmental disaster. At the same time it was a huge commercial success.

      After it was banned the companies who manufactured CFCs simply switched to other stuff. They practically did not lose money on this. All was payed by the consumers. So yes, I agree with you. I 'd love to have one of those as well.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  5. GNU games console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What we need is a GPL-licenced games console hardware design, built from relatively common components, that can be assembled by the user, or bought.

    It wouldn't have to be very high-powered either, I would suggest an 68030 as the main CPU, with two 68000's one each as a sound and graphics processor - that's more processing power than is in a lot of the games in your local arcade, and perfectly adequate for the sort of games that most hackers like to play, (I.E. RPGs, beat-em-ups, shoot-em-ups, etc).

    Just another of my excellent ideas :-)

    1. Re:GNU games console by turgid · · Score: 1, Funny

      Better idea: use 8 Z-80's in parallel to make a 64/128-bit processor and then another 8 for the graphics hardware. We'll have an AY-3-8192 for 3 channel sound + white noise. We can code the ROM in FORTH and when it boots it'll go into a BASIC interpreter (written in FORTH). It will have line numbers from 1-9999 (who could ever need more than 10000 lines in a program?) and FOR, NEXT, GOTO and GOSUB for looping and subroutines. There should also be a 1500 baud cassette tape interface. If we're cunning we could make it capable of, say, 64 colours, but only 2 per group of 8 pixels (1 byte) i.e. 0=background, 1=foreground. Then, there's all that CP/M, Spectrum, Amstrad and MSX software we could run on it!

    2. Re:GNU games console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh that's really witty, making fun of my idea. Actually I quite liked the AY-3-8192, anyway.

      By the way, you mock CP/M, yet it was very successful in it's day, you mock the Spectrum, yet it's amasing how what Sir Clive put in to his machines, (e.g. solid state storage on the Z88), emerges 10 years later as the normal, (flash memory), you mock Amstrad, but at least they are making a profit, and you mock MSX, well, I've never used an MSX, but then again, you probably haven't either.

      If my idea was so stupid, though, why are brand new games still being released for the NeoGeo(tm), and earning a lot of money in arcades?

    3. Re:GNU games console by turgid · · Score: 1

      Dude, I've used CP/M, MSX, ZX81, Spectrum, BBC Micro, Acorn Archimeded, 6502 Single Board Computers, you name it. I had a ZX81 and then a Spectrum 128. My friend had a couple of MSX machines. We coded basic on the MSX. I coded BASIC, C, FORTH and assembler on the Spectrum and ZX81, then went on to a 286 running DOS 3.31. I just reckon that your idea would have been better if you'd spec'd an ARM or MIPS processor and a low-end commodity graphics board and sound board. Because of economies of scale, they'd be cheaper and more powerful, and easier to code for with many compilers and libraries already available.

    4. Re:GNU games console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, hang on a minute, you had all those 8-bit machines, and coded BASIC, C, FORTH... Did you program an ALTAIR BASIC by any chance!? :-) Getting a bit suspicious this is...

      Anyway, you're probably right an 030 was a bit of a dumb spec. An ARM would probably be my processor of choice, for a sensible games machine, and an ATI graphics chipset. Dunno about sound.

      I quite liked the Spectrum 128+ - did you have an Interface 1, and a microdrive? Personally, the Apple ][ was my coding machine of choice - I had 5 drives, which unfortunately took up loads of expansion slots, but gave me a decent amount of storage, (I couldn't afford a hard disk), and it was the same when I moved on to the Amiga - I still couldn't afford a hard disk, and had 3 floppy drives.

      Actually, I've just thought - Linux on the CD-32(tm) would be an EXCELLENT games console platform :-)

    5. Re:GNU games console by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      why not Linux on the Gamecube, then? PowerPC ISA should make it a doddle, and it's obviously possible to modify the machine somewhat a la Panasonic. I thought ARM chips were usually FPU-less?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    6. Re:GNU games console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux on the Gamecube(tm)... Interesting...

      Not sure that the lack of an FPU is really a problem for a games machine, I guess it depends on what sort of games you want to play with it.

      I don't really like 3d type stuff very much, to be honest. What I see the theoretical open source console being is something like a cross between a SNES(tm) and a Playstation(tm).

      I.E.

      * Simple architechture to make it cheap and easy to program
      * 'Make it in to a real computer' option, so that people could use it in labs for doing scientific work as well.
      * Main types of games being:
      * RPGs, (I hate them, but others seem to like them)
      * Shoot-em-ups
      * 2D beat-em-ups
      * Puzzle games

      The whole thing would be in a 19" rackmount case, and use standard components.

    7. Re:GNU games console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      19" case
      Common Components
      Easy to program
      a "real computer"
      Playstation - SNES quality graphics

      Sounds like a low end Pentium box with a PCI vidcard t'me.

    8. Re:GNU games console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you're right, but the PC architechture is still too diverse - a better analogy would be a high-end Amiga(tm).

    9. Re:GNU games console by turgid · · Score: 1

      No, Altair was before my time. I was born in '74. I had an interface one and microdrive for the Spectrum. I had the HiSoft integer K&R C compiler for it :-) The ZX81 had a replacement ROM in it that ran multitasking (!) FORTH - in only 8K or ROM and 16k of RAM.

    10. Re:GNU games console by mdw2 · · Score: 1

      so basically you want the mythical console that was missing between the genesis and the saturn eh? :)

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    11. Re:GNU games console by badasscat · · Score: 1

      We have this already - it's called the SNK Neo Geo AES. Or the Atari Jaguar, if you want something *specifically* open-source (as opposed to that grey area when a company goes under). Hasbro released the rights to the Jaguar back when they owned Atari - it's now in the public domain. In other words, given the runaway success the Jaguar *hasn't* been, I'm not sure this is a really workable idea.

    12. Re:GNU games console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The SNK(tm) NeoGeo(tm) AES(tm) is an excellect system. Imagine how good a system with similar capabilities would be if it was a completely open design.

      If the mythical GNU games console had a JAMMA connector on it as well, then so much the better - arcade operators could legally run loads of good games in their arcade without making a big investment. If they could just download new games free of charge, burn them on to a CD-R, and load them up, think how popular their arcades would be. They could sell copies of the games at the arcades too - for the cost of, say, two blank CD-Rs, to save people having to download them. Then, the people could play the games at home, and at the arcade.

      Infact, I guess what I really imagined, is the open source equivilent of the NeoGeo(tm).

      What's the boot message for the NeoGeo(tm) port of Linux, by the way? The NeoGeo games have an excellent intro, (for anybody who hasn't seen it, it's really cool, and has a catchy little jingle as well).

    13. Re:GNU games console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never had an Altair(tm) either :-(, but I did have a Phillips G7000(tm), (called an Oddysey^2(tm) in the U.S.A.).

      What used to amase me, was the way that people at the time used to say, "NEVER use a tape longer than a C-15 to record computer programs on.". Did these people EVER program anything over about 1K on a ZX81? It was so slow, and used to take about half an hour just to load a 16K program from tape, which meant that you could only get one decent program on one side of a C-60, anyway!

    14. Re:GNU games console by turgid · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, the joys of the ZX81 tap interface. There was no way to verify what you'd saved, so you had to save it two or three times. It was awful. However, they improved the tape I/O significantly for the Spectrum and it was about as good as you could get on a domestic tape recorder. Do you remember those "turboload" games? How did they work? Did they use more than two tones for the data or what? I remember Tomahawk (Apache simulator by Digital Integration) used to load really fast but sounded really odd. Using an assembler on the '81 was nigh on impossible, since it would take 10 mins to load, 1 min to put your code in and *crash*. Rinse and repeat. The humble hex loader was the way to go...Then when I grew up I ended up having to regularly speak to a Honeywell 316 in a similar fashion, only it was octal, not hex :-)

    15. Re:GNU games console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that they just speeded up the tones, and took advantage of the fact that tapes improved a lot between 1982 and about 1987.

      Also, I know that with the ROM tape routines, one bit value lasted twice as long as the other, so, say, 10K of 0s would either be double of half the load time of 10K of 1s.

      More tones would have been an excellent way forward, kind of like how 9600 BPS modems work, (I.E. at 2400 BAUD, 4 bits per baud).

      My favourite loaders were the block loaders, I.E. the ones that went like this:

      BEEEEEEEEEE,SHHHHHH,BEE,SHHHHHH,BEE,SHHHHHH,BEE, SH HHHHH

      and incremented a hex digit for each block that successfully loaded. If one didn't, then you could just re-wind the tape about 10 seconds, and load just that block again. Excellent.

      The original IBM-PC(tm), had a tape interface, and I've often wondered what the recorded programs sounded like, (yeah, I know, that is *REALLY* sad, but at one point, I could identify about 30 different 8-bit machines from listening to the tapes). I liked identifying modems too :-).

      The 16K RAM pack wobble problem that plagued the ZX81(tm) was a right pain as well :-)

    16. Re:GNU games console by KagakuNinja · · Score: 1

      Just write an EMACS extension...

    17. Re:GNU games console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already done!!! Just download it from /dev/null, run EMACS, and type control-meta-hyper-super-top-front-shift-bang

    18. Re:GNU games console by turgid · · Score: 1

      Now that's interesting. I remember that the original IBM PC had a tape interface, but I never saw one use it either. Remember that if you didn't have DOS on disk it would boot into ROM BASIC? That was still there on the PS/2 machines back in '87 right through until some of the 486-based ones IIRC. It had the commands MOTOR ON and MOTOR OFF for controlling the tape player, but I think it gave you some sort of error saying it was no longer supported :-)

    19. Re:GNU games console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, most genuine IBM(tm) machines did have the ROM basic until at least the 486-based ones.

      If you did boot DOS, and ran basica.com, I think it actually called the ROM basic, and that's why basica.com didn't work on non-IBM(tm) machines. I saw references to the tape interface commands in a DOS 2.X manual.

      The relay in the cassette circuit would have been useful on many occasions, what a shame they dropped it! I connected a cine-camera up to an Electron once, and used the cassette-relay to control it :-).

    20. Re:GNU games console by Exiler · · Score: 1

      Yea! Then we have a whole new generation of script kiddies! "up down left X, w00t! I crashed the server!!"

      --
      Banaaaana!
    21. Re:GNU games console by Exiler · · Score: 1

      Heh, I didn't realize I used so many '!'s in that ^_^

      --
      Banaaaana!
    22. Re:GNU games console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of commands, we could have combos, with less frequently used commands being assigned a more difficult combo. Infact, that would be excellent for security, because while an ls command might be:

      Hold button 1, Left, Right, Release button 1

      rm -r / could be something like:

      Hold down buttons 1, 3 and 5, Left, Right, Down, Up, Up and Down at the same time (!), then press buttons 2, 4 and 6, Left, release button 3, Right, then release all buttons.

    23. Re:GNU games console by dolmen.fr · · Score: 1

      The problem would be the cost.

      Currently, all sales of games consoles cost money to the manufacturer. There income is from software.

      A hardware-equivalent "GNU games console" would require a much higher price.

    24. Re:GNU games console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see what you mean, but using lower-powered hardware, and writing better code, (as seems to be the tendency with open source VS closed source projects), would help to lower the cost, plus making it yourself would lower costs as well.

      I estimate that the cost would be about 300 UK pounds, but then all the games would be free...

    25. Re:GNU games console by turgid · · Score: 1

      It's often intrigued me how you would write some code to read back the signal off of the tape. What sort of algorithn would you use? What about the maths involved? I've never really been into electronics myself, but, yes, that relay sounds cool.

    26. Re:GNU games console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not really sure of the details, but I would imagine that the hardware detects the transition between signals on the tape, I.E. the top and bottom of the sine wave.

      So, a 1Khz tone would have 2000 transitions per second, and a 2Khz tone would have 4000 transitions per second. That might be wrong, I'm only guessing here.

      Some interesting details about modems, (which must be similar in some respects), is available here:

      http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Modem-HOWTO-20.html

    27. Re:GNU games console by turgid · · Score: 1

      Interesting. If I am not mistaken, the ZX81 and Spectrum both did it in software, simply by toggling a bit in an output port (in the way that the spectrum BEEP worked). I suppose you could sample the port, say at 10kHz and count the number of 1's and 0's to detect high and low notes, and that way there'd be a bit of a margin for error. I bet some people lost a lot of hair developing that code. :-)

    28. Re:GNU games console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are interested in the tape system, try to find an old copy of the relevant issue of "Your Sinclair"(tm), (I think, from memory, that it's the one with "Altered Beast"(tm) on the cover), which has the program "Vari-Turbo"(tm), in Program Pitstop(tm). It can save and load at two speeds, E.G. block 1 - 600 BPS, block 2 - 900 BPS, block 3 back to 600 BPS. I think I managed to get it to work at about 2.5x the normal speed, albeit somewhat unreliably.

      What I'd have done, if I'd been designing an 8-bit machine at the time, would have been to specify a stereo tape recorder, and record different data on each channel :-)

      (Actually, the Atari(tm) 8-bit machines did use one channel for data, and the other one for voice, which was played through the TV speaker, so you could have music while you waited for the programs to load - and they took about as long to load as the ZX81(tm) programs!)

  6. once again.... by smileyj68 · · Score: 2, Troll

    I like the name. It reminds me of something else all right thinking people wanted to rid the world of.

    1. Re:once again.... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2

      not too sure what your definition of right thinking people is, but in my world, it's this:

      Box for the cable/tivo. TV. Game Console. Computer. I like that they are seperate. I think the rest of the worl likes that they are seperate. Didn't they learn from their original webtv or what ever the heck it was called abortion?

      I know, there is POTENTIALLY a huge market for an all inclusive product. Problem is, we don't want it. And those of us that do, well, they are a small minority I believe. Maybe in another generation or two, this would be feasible.

      I can see it now, 50 years from now:

      "Dude, what's that?"
      "It's a Tivo. It only records and stores "live" *snicker* tv."
      "Man, those poor bastards...good thing I have my Linux 5750 Access port."
      "Yeah. Let's just hope the MAN doesn't get the free software Anti-DRM repealed."
      "Word*."

      *I am sure "word" will be replaced with something much cooler. Us old farts (well, by then anyway, won't know cool if it smackes us and takes our money.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    2. Re:once again.... by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

      I'm convinced that "word" will be replaced with "sham zammy" as the coolness factor of today's infomercials catches up with popular culture 50 years from now.

      --
      I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    3. Re:once again.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes and we all know that people who want quality sound buy seperates for there hi-fi systems.

      The sales of hi-fi sepreates are shadowed by the huge sales in all-in-one hi-fi's

      QED

      seperates allow you to buy the best of each type

  7. just add a TV tuner card by Joseph+Lam · · Score: 1

    is it just an XBox with an additional bt878 + Philips Tuner? if so then it'd be cool to have xawtv and ffmpeg running on the forthcoming "XBox Linux"

    1. Re:just add a TV tuner card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is it just an XBox with an additional bt878 + Philips Tuner?

      That's the idea.. tack on features cheaply, and raise the price substantially.

  8. They can't dominate me by joshsnow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Microsoft can only dominate your living room if you own a television.

    1. Re:They can't dominate me by krmt · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are you kidding? Have you seen an X-Box? If put one in your living room, the room will be dominated by the unholy size of the thing.

      Then you can use it as a combination coffee table and space heater. Now that's utility!

      --

      "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

    2. Re:They can't dominate me by tshak · · Score: 2

      Even though my PS2 is practically the same size (The XBox is a lot deeper, but it's not even as deep as my DVD player so they both take the same practically useable space).

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    3. Re:They can't dominate me by jasonbw · · Score: 1

      My drinks keep slipping off the damn thing!

    4. Re:They can't dominate me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, your living room sucks! To compare it's size to an XBox is hilarious!

    5. Re:They can't dominate me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I got the whole &@% G4 Cube package with 3 screens and everything I ever need! I laugh at you microsoft simpletons!!!MUHUHUHHAAA

      *please excuse the swearing*

    6. Re:They can't dominate me by a1z26b2y25 · · Score: 1

      The only XBox's I have seen are never working at Wal-Mart or Meijers. And yet this may be any parents dream, to have a blank screen and the kids enjoying stimulating activities elsewhere. Maybe M$ is a family friendly organization after all.

  9. Backwards compatability? by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What happens to all those people who shelled out almost $400 at the begining of the xboxes life?

    Do they now have to cough up another $500 for a X-Tivo just so they can play any new games?

    Releasing new box after new box, and cutting off your established user base isn't going to win this system any fans...

    At least an old pc can still play new games, albeit at lower resolutions, will the old x-box play new games, or will they handicap the new games so they aren't as impressive on the new box?

    --


    He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    1. Re:Backwards compatability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can hear Bill Gates agonizing over it now:

      "Let's see . . . money grab . . . do right by the customer . . . money grab . . . do right by the customer . . . gee, that's a tough one. Hey Steve, come and help me make a decision here."

    2. Re:Backwards compatability? by zwoelfk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "At least an old pc can still play new games..."

      1. what you describe would be forward compatibility not backward (XBox playing XBox2 games which isn't going to happen)

      2. one of my biggest peeves with windows is lack of compatibility for games across versions. my daughter has something like a hundred PC games (bought!) that were written for various versions of DX and windows and all of which show an amazing lack of compatibility with the newer versions of windows. Win2K,WinME don't work -most- of the time. WinXP is a bit better (in compatibility mode). so I have to basically maintain an extra machine to play (Win98) to play these games. let's not even go on to my pile of DOS games. the PC is no better.

      3. sony has set a nice example with PS2 compatibility with PSX games. I would be surprised if the next version of XBox didn't do the same thing.

      "Releasing new box after new box, and cutting off your established user base isn't going to win this system any fans..."

      uhh.. hello? this is the way the console market has -always- worked. and it -has- won them new fans, year after year. I don't hear much complaining that the gamecube doesn't play NES games.

    3. Re:Backwards compatability? by HFXPro · · Score: 1

      I believe Atari tried doing just that a couple of years before. We see where that got them at.

      --
      Reserved Word.
    4. Re:Backwards compatability? by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 1

      Yeah but NES games are not 3 years old...

      You're right, backwards compatability isn't the word I'm looking for, I'm just trying to say that if they create a new platform before this one matures, they'll be locking out a lot of gamers, who are either not happy to have to spend so much cash to play the latest xbox games, or don't want all the extra features. If they create the games to take advantage of the new (I'm assuming the system will have updated components) hardware, they're going to exclude a large portion of their installed user base, it's a really risky push in my opinion. Plus they're going to put the developers in a bind.
      The situation they're going to try and create is have someone develop enough mindblowing games to justify an extremely large purchase(for a gaming console) which will hopefully bring in enough users to get the rest of the developers to move from the established base to the "to be created" user base. Sega screwed themselves in this way.

      --


      He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    5. Re:Backwards compatability? by kpetruse · · Score: 1

      What?

      Hasn't every tech company ever done this? It's called progress. Sure, the PS2 can play most PSOne games, but why play Gran Turismo when GT3 is out? Why play Grand Theft Auto when there's GTA3?

      Or are you hoping that you can play Doom3 on your 486?

    6. Re:Backwards compatability? by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 1

      In the case of the PSX the developers had reached (and had time to reach) the very limits of what the psx could do, and the PS2 was the next logical step... right now the xbox hasn't been around enough time, or even been tested to it's limits. I say it's too early.

      No a 486 won't play Doom3, but I'm not going to buy a new computer just to play that game, as pretty as it looks. I will, however, shell out 150 bucks for the gamecube because it has some cool new games. $500 is a lot of money, they're going to need a real "killer app" type of game.

      --


      He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    7. Re:Backwards compatability? by kpetruse · · Score: 1

      Well, this is planned for 2004-5, so by that time the X-Box will probably have been pushed fairly far. Console lifecycles are something like 3 years so this makes perfect business sense. There's nothing particularily revolutionary in the Freon's vapourware specs.

      Not so keen on the Gamecube myself, it's a bit too kiddy for my tastes, but hey, each to their own. Gonna stick with my PS2 until the next gen comes along.

      If Doom3 can capture the creeping skin horrorflick feel of Dooms 1 and 2 (btw, Doom still scares me playing it on the Gameboy Advance), then I'll be more than happy to shell out on a PC upgrade.

    8. Re:Backwards compatability? by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 1

      I thought they were trying to supercede(spelling) the release of the PS3 which is due out in FEB 2004, which means they're going to have to release it in late 2003, which is just over a year from now.

      Anyhow, I think 4 years is a better hardware cycle, for most platforms nowadays, the first good games (in any decent quantity) really don't come out for about a year. There are always some standouts, but it's usually the second generation games which make the biggest impression.

      --


      He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    9. Re:Backwards compatability? by Arsewiper · · Score: 1

      Of course it's backwards compatible. The more backwards you are - the more likely you'll fall for the latest desperate attempt to squeeze more money out of people.

    10. Re:Backwards compatability? by techstar25 · · Score: 2

      What happened to those people who shelled out $100 at the beginning of WIndows 95s life.

      They had to cough up another $100 for Win98, and then another for WinMe and then another for XP, so they can use new software.

      They released OS after OS cutting off their user base for years, and now they're the biggest company in the world. We've heard this all before. And it worked beautifully the first time. But this time there is an alternative.

    11. Re:Backwards compatability? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Steve would be far too busy snorting coke off a hookers' tits while eating a cheeseburger to come and help Bill with his moral dilemma. I think Bill normally consults the magic 8 ball in situations like this. Does anyone else iagine Redmond to resemble nothing so mjuch as OCP's headquarters?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    12. Re:Backwards compatability? by rseuhs · · Score: 2

      It's OK if you release a new box every 5-6 years, but releasing a new one every 2 years will not work.

    13. Re:Backwards compatability? by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      I think Bill normally consults the magic 8 ball in situations like this.

      I would love to see the choices on Bill's magic 8 ball:

      - Yes
      - No
      - Unclear
      - Do whichever is more EVIL
      - Giggle and snort manically
      - Buy Seattle

    14. Re:Backwards compatability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Atari did do this, the 5200 could run 2600 games with an adapter, and the 7800 could run 2600 games right out of the box. The 7800 was released, what, 8 or 9 years after the 2600? If I remember, bungled business and design decisions dictated the newer machines relative commercial failure more than the presence or lack of backward compatibility in the newer machines.

    15. Re:Backwards compatability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Not so keen on the Gamecube myself, it's a bit too kiddy for my tastes

      Let me guess, late teens, early twenties, still not quite gotten the hang of puberty yet, am I close?

    16. Re:Backwards compatability? by kpetruse · · Score: 1

      Not at all, old chap. Been playing games for >20 years. Left puberty behind many years ago.

      And now hangovers last two days.

      I'm just not so keen on the Mario style games. Anything wrong with that, AC?

    17. Re:Backwards compatability? by Exiler · · Score: 1

      I'm with him, I may only be 14 but I don't like seeing Zelda look like a Disney movie. But what do I know about new gen consoles, I sold my PSX and N64 and now all I have left is my NES, numerous Atari's, Master System and 3DOs ( ;

      --
      Banaaaana!
    18. Re:Backwards compatability? by Exiler · · Score: 1

      Whoops, double post. I blame Coca-Cola and caffine *twitch*

      --
      Banaaaana!
  10. Batman by asciimonster · · Score: 1

    It seems like Microsoft was held hostage by Mr Freeze. (Batman rulez!)

    The name says it all: All those fancy Microsoft stuff will eventually Freeze up! (BSOD)

  11. I think that M$ has Missed the Point by BlackGriffen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The entire point of the console market is as follows:

    one: cheap
    two: uniform hardware (or as close to it as possible)
    three: a long upgrade cycle (about 5 years)
    four: sell hardware at a loss or paper thin margins to make money back on software

    My guess is that this will turn out to be the jack of all trades, but master of none. If they sell this thing cheap enough to be a successful console, then they'll lose money for every set top boxer. If they sell it at a respectable profit, it won't be a successful console. Granted, they could simply make it X-Box compatible, but then anyone willing to spring for a set top will probably buy them separately to get better features, or taylor their setup to their own needs. Not to mention the households like mine that have a dedicated gaming TV (nothing spectacular, really) so that other people can watch movies et al whilst the gamers game.

    BlackGriffen

    1. Re:I think that M$ has Missed the Point by Rayder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Worse than this, If MS thinks it can make a Video set top box better than SONY can, they are plain wrong. SONY is now a major manufacturer of professional video devices, and a major maker of game consoles, they have the know-how to tie all this together with their own chips and manufacturing plants.
      Nice try microsoft, but this is not going to work... :-)

    2. Re:I think that M$ has Missed the Point by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Correction, SONY is now a major label on somewhat decently made products.

      You think that brandnames are the manufacturers? Next you're going to tell me that an IBM Aptiva is made 100% in an IBM factory and not some slave labour camp in taiwan......

      I wish the best of luck for MSFT because quite frankly nobody else is.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    3. Re:I think that M$ has Missed the Point by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      Worse than this, If MS thinks it can make a Video set top box better than SONY can, they are plain wrong. SONY is now a major manufacturer of professional video devices, and a major maker of game consoles, they have the know-how to tie all this together with their own chips and manufacturing plants.
      Nice try microsoft, but this is not going to work... :-)


      Business 101: Corporations have two basic resources: capital, and management attention. Corporate strategy is the decision making process that allocates these in ways that fulfill the company's objectives (which may be as nebulously defined as "enhance shareholder value"). Anything a company wants or wants to do can usually be acquired or fulfilled using these two resources. It's wrong to assume that Microsoft not owning a fab right now will make much difference in the long term.

      Also, there's something that savvy players in professional services (law, consulting, investment banking, etc) have known for a long time: unless you really want the brand, it's often not worth buying another company, since all the assets are intellectual. It's much cheaper to simply poach the key players and selectively encourage defections from their staff to yours. The same is true in high tech, witness Microsoft's strategy aagainst Borland. If Microsoft want to get people (all business is people, really) they can look to Sony or to Sony's rivals.

      The future is still very much in play.

    4. Re:I think that M$ has Missed the Point by markmoss · · Score: 2

      some slave labour camp in taiwan......

      Taiwan doesn't have slave labor camps. Taiwan is (compared to most Asian countries) free and democratic. If they want slave labor, they've got to get an agent in Hong Kong to contract to get the work done on the mainland.

    5. Re:I think that M$ has Missed the Point by rnd() · · Score: 2

      You sound like a luddite. Look at it this way: let them surprise you with a new definition of the console.

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

    6. Re:I think that M$ has Missed the Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you sound like an illiterate jackass. Why don't you go look up the meaning of the word "luddite", fignuts.

    7. Re:I think that M$ has Missed the Point by rnd() · · Score: 2
      From Dictionary.com: A Luddite is one who opposes technical or technological change.

      I stand by what I wrote.

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

    8. Re:I think that M$ has Missed the Point by blaine · · Score: 1

      It's been pointed out before, but I'd just like to make the point that selling consoles at below cost is not a time-honored tradition of the console industry, nor does the most successful console maker (Sony) do any such thing. In fact, at this point in time, Sony makes a tidy profit of the sales of Playstation 2 consoles. Given the advances in manufacturing since it's release, it is estimated that they make in the range of $100 profit per console sold, even with the recent price drop.

      I'll give you that Microsoft is selling the XBox below cost (estimated at around a $150 loss per console, although I'm not sure how that has changed since the price drop and since their manufacturing improvements). But seriously, what do you expect? This is the Microsoft way: if you want to get into a market, do whatever it takes, even if it means dumping billions down the drain. All that matters to MS is taking control of the console market, and they'll work on making a profit later (they've got plenty of profit from their other endeavours to keep the XBox afloat).

      Anyways, my point is this: don't assume that just because Microsoft (and now, Nintendo as well, to a smaller degree) are stupid enough to fall into the same trap that Sega did with the Dreamcast, that this is how the console industry has always worked, or how the console industry will work in the future. Even now, Sony is still dominating the market, and they make a profit per console on top of that. Somehow, I think that MS is going to have trouble topping that, given that they have to sell around 15 games to a customer to make a profit (console = -$150, each game = roughly +$10 in licensing). Seriously, nobody wants 15 copies of Halo, and that's about the only worthwhile game the XBox has.

      --

      -[Blaine]- "'Oh dear,' says God, 'I hadn't thought of that,' and promptly vanishes in a puff of logic."
    9. Re:I think that M$ has Missed the Point by ivan256 · · Score: 2

      Let me surprise them when I don't buy it.

    10. Re:I think that M$ has Missed the Point by flatrock · · Score: 2

      This isn't the entire point of the console market? It's the way the market currently works. The point of the market is to make money selling video games to consumers.

      one:cheap - This definately helps sell games. Microsoft is selling their consoles and games pretty cheap, but they aren't amking money while doing it. In order to make money, they need to increase volumes on the games.

      two: uniform hardware - this is what gives consoles a uniforme experience. It makes games easier to develop and more stable. Bringing out a new console every year makes creating games harder, but not nearly as bad as developing for PCs. A three year product cycle might be more reasonable.

      three: a long upgrade cycle - The only reason Microsoft wants a long upgrade cycle is to avoid pissing off customers who don't want to upgrade often, and developers that don't want to have to develop for multiple XBox platforms. Microsoft DOES want to have a shorter product cycle than Sony. Sony develops their own processors at a huge expense. SOny only starts making money off of selling consoles after several years of selling the same console to make back those development costs. Microsoft uses off the shelf processors. Their consoles cost much less to develop. Therefore shorter product cycles effect them much less than Sony. Sony also has a harder time maintaining compatibility between platforms because of their custom development. These things all give Microsoft and advantage if they have a shorter cycle than Sony. Annual upgrades still don't make sense, but 3 year cycles sure do.

      four: sell hardware at a loss or paper thin margins to make money back on software -
      Freon is more than a console, and therefore can be expected to cost more. Because it can perform those multiple features with pretty much the same hardware, they can make it cost considerably less than the price of two seperate boxes. Freon won't likely replace the next generation of the XBox. Freon will likely be a seperate, more expensive product that is compatible with the next XBox. They can use the same hardware to provide gaming features, and have additional hardware and software to support video on Freon. Of maybe Feaon might just be a $200 price tag for a cool remote and video software, and a bigger hard drive.

    11. Re:I think that M$ has Missed the Point by Fjord · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, but aquisition isn't as good as having an already established brand and manufacturing site(s). There are many things that go with aquisition that can impact how you enter into a market. You had better pad the timeline a lot or you will ship late. Egos in the aquired company have to be stroked just right, or you'll have a talent exodus and you'll have just bought a bunch of equipment.

      I realize that Microsoft is no stranger to aquiring, but it still even with their experience, it isn't as good as owning th eplants already.

      --
      -no broken link
    12. Re:I think that M$ has Missed the Point by rnd() · · Score: 2

      That is your choice! It's nice to see someone thinking like a capitalist here... :)

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

    13. Re:I think that M$ has Missed the Point by tshak · · Score: 2

      Less we forget that the entire reason that Sony came into the market is for the same thing that MS is doing now. Sony has a HD upgrade for a reason, and it's not just for multiplayer gaming.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    14. Re:I think that M$ has Missed the Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is your choice! It's nice to see someone thinking like a capitalist here... :)

      No, he's thinking like a consumer. A capitalist would say something more like "Let me surprise them when I don't invest in their scheme." or more likely "to hell with what I think of them, it looks like a good investment to me."

    15. Re:I think that M$ has Missed the Point by rnd() · · Score: 2

      a consumer-oriented society is a capitalist society, and vice-versa. Anything else is inefficient.

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

    16. Re:I think that M$ has Missed the Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft sold Xboxs from the start at a loss... now they lowered the price so their really taking a hit, it's just that it's a better console.

      Personally I think people should just get TV tuners in their computers, get a good graphics card, and you can do all of it!!! Either way Microsoft gains money so why do they care!

    17. Re:I think that M$ has Missed the Point by BlackGriffen · · Score: 2

      Luddite, huh? You, sir, are a troll. I never said that I was opposed to the idea, I said it wouldn't succeed. That would make me a nay-sayer, and a skeptic.

      Let met put it to you this way, where has the combination TV VCR gone? Unless there is some financial or technological advantage of integrating two things with separate functions, attempting to strap a vacuum cleaner to the refrigerator does not make for a successful product just because you have integrated the functions of two devices.

      Now go back to your cave, and try to come up with a better insult next time, troll.

      BlackGriffen

    18. Re:I think that M$ has Missed the Point by BlackGriffen · · Score: 1

      All very good points, but will the average consumer go for a 3 year cycle? It may please hard core gamers who like to stay on the bleeding edge, but the console market's bread and butter isn't the hardcore gamer, who probably stays on the bleeding edge with their PC on a 2 or 3 year product cycle that costs more, but the money conscious persons who want to play games, but can't afford to keep up with a PC. Ideally for the consumers, there wouldn't be any noticeable upgrade cycle, like with TV's and VCR's. I suspect that if M$ tries a three year strategy, what they'll do is alienate the mainstream consumers. One possible solution would be legacy compatibility, but that raises problems if they try to maintain it for more than one generation back. A three year with legacy might actually be feasible, but I have my reservations. For instance, a lot of the success of a console relies on the fact that each generation the graphics jump jump in quality, driving sales and user base; necessary ingredients in convincing developers to make games for you. I don't see M$ being able to make drastic enough leaps in graphics quality every 3 years to overcome their own inertia. Remember, the entire business strategy is to overcome the chicken and the egg problem: how do you get market share without games, and how do you convince developers to make games without market share? So far, M$ has done this with a pile of money. This strategy isn't really sustainable, though, and the console market traditionally relies on cheap hardware and graphical leaps (giving users a good reason to upgrade, if only for the wow factor).

      I suppose it could succeed, but I'm still willing to bet that a serious user could get a better value and/or more performance from separate console and set top box. Just like the current consoles and DVD players. The PS2 DVD player is crap. The Panasonic Q (gamecube compat, Japan only), is just decent. The XBox DVD player, besides costing extra, is also definitely not top of the line.

      BlackGriffen

    19. Re:I think that M$ has Missed the Point by rnd() · · Score: 2
      I interpreted your comment as though you were saying "I like my consoles just the way they are, damn it. In my day we had a separate console, a separate PVR, and we liked it.". I would have expected you to use the word "newfangled" as part of your expression of dismay about the state of the world. What has the world come to, anyway.

      They're trying to combine a TiVO (an extremely popular device) with a game console (another extremely popular device). This isn't the Jetsons, this is common sense made possible by the commodity hardware used in the X-Box.

      I don't mean to troll, there's nothing wrong with being a luddite. I think there are even Luddites-anonymous support groups out there.

      By the way, no offense intended.

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

  12. hey Bill, fuck off by DrSkwid · · Score: 0, Troll

    think that just about says it all tbh

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  13. X-Box more costly cuz of Windows (RETCH) by Wraithlyn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "The Xbox console isn't profitable for the Redmond, Wash., company and its costs are believed to be higher than Sony's, partly because of the hard drive and a version of its powerful Windows operating system included with each machine."

    Oh cry me a river. Like Microsoft is losing money because of all the billions they're pouring into the miraculous X-Box Bastardized Windows Operating System. Sure, maybe the hard disk is a lotta coin, but the cost of putting Windows on a console? Catastrophic.

    --
    "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    1. Re:X-Box more costly cuz of Windows (RETCH) by Juju · · Score: 2

      Whoever modded this one as Troll is one stupid reader.
      I find your remark very much to the point. I can't understand how Microsoft is loosing money on each console because of Windows... Surely this is a one off R&D cost. Unless Microsoft (the OS division) is charging the M$ fee for each console sold. That would really be a funny one, but I doubt it works like that...

      --
      Black holes occur when God divides by zero.
    2. Re:X-Box more costly cuz of Windows (RETCH) by dsb3 · · Score: 2

      > Unless Microsoft (the OS division) is charging the M$ fee for each console sold. That would really be a funny one, but I doubt it works like that...

      Microsoft may not be actually writing itself a cheque, but this could be the start of some great 'creative' accounting, if put in the right (wrong) hands.

      "But Judge, we're LOSING money. Protect us from those nasty competitors!!"

      --

      Slashdot? Oh, I just read it for the articles.
    3. Re:X-Box more costly cuz of Windows (RETCH) by Technician · · Score: 2

      That would really be a funny one, but I doubt it works like that...

      Ummm Maybe the cost is related to the fact that running Windows requires more memory and a hard drive which runs the costs up more than the competition.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    4. Re:X-Box more costly cuz of Windows (RETCH) by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      Ummm Maybe the cost is related to the fact that running Windows requires more memory and a hard drive which runs the costs up more than the competition

      I don't think the special version of Windows that comes with the XBox does necessarily, for example it doesn't have virtual memory support. It could probably be run from firmware like CE does. As far as I know, the OS actually comes on the game disk.

    5. Re:X-Box more costly cuz of Windows (RETCH) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      unlike Tivo which doesn't have a hard drive and uses no memory right?

      think before you troll man, that's all i'm asking...

    6. Re:X-Box more costly cuz of Windows (RETCH) by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

      Given the way that large corporations work, it wouldn't surprise me if Microsoft were billing themselves for use of the cut down 2K OS. At a massive discount, with... interesting... tax implications, I'd further speculate.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    7. Re:X-Box more costly cuz of Windows (RETCH) by cefek · · Score: 1

      And it would also be great, if you put the source for this quotation. Really.

      --
      Plain old sigh.
  14. Ahhh! I got it. by af_robot · · Score: 1

    It just due their plans to use Duron instead of Intel chips...

  15. Patents by kwishot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You'd think that TiVo has some sort of patent on this kind of thing....
    Oh wait....thats right....
    OurCourtSystem: Money=Influence Microsoft=Money, therefore Microsoft=Influence. Patents and other such laws no longer apply!
    Anyways...seriously...does TiVo (or someone) have this patented?

    1. Re:Patents by kawaichan · · Score: 2

      Um... Why are you being such a troll

      Microsoft has already have a TiVo like system, it's called the Ultimate TV.

      So until next time, please don't start the trolling and stupid MS bashing until you get all the facts straight

      --

      kawai
    2. Re:Patents by gcshaw2nd · · Score: 1
      It appears that this effort on Microsoft's part is also an attempt ot recoup the losses of UltimateTV. MS blames the cable companies and vice versa for the failure, but either way billions of dollars went down the drain. Now they're going to try to make the XBox into the box they always wanted. The problem is that they still don't have the support of the cablie companies. The solution to this appears to be mimic Tivo, and expand on the idea. So MS is spending a few billion more to build several "data centers" around the world that will be used for gaming as well Tivo like features.

      I peg their changes of success to the inverse of their greediness. Unfortunately thse past few years have revealed a trend toward greater greediness, locking out competitors, etc, and locking consumers into a closed system.

      I'm just glad that the European Union is much more an advocate of privacy and open standards than the US government has proven to be. The EU is much stricter about these kinds of practices, and their actions will effect us Americans in a good way. Case in point: the EU is investigating Creative for the spyware their PlayCenter software installs. I can't tell you how pissed off I was to discover those programs tracking my browsing habits, and they were tacked on to a buggy program that hardly works but to which I have no alternatives, just to use my Nomad Jukebox.

      That's probably enough ranting for now.

    3. Re:Patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, do you realize that UltimateTV was a DirecTV-only box, that is to say, it only worked with people who had a DirecTV satellite dish and who subscribed to the DirecTV satellite TV service? UltimateTV had absolutely nothing to do with the cable TV companies. You are probably thinking of MicrosoftTV, an attempt to sell a WebTV-like box to the cable companies, which never caught on.

    4. Re:Patents by Phil+Wilkins · · Score: 2

      > Microsoft has already have a TiVo like system, it's called the Ultimate TV.

      No, it's called, third place in a one horse race.

      Although that's what RenderMorphics was before they bought it renamed it Direct3D, and started giving it away for nothing. here

      [I worked at Argonaut during all this, although I never met Rich, IIRC his office was stateside]

    5. Re:Patents by gcshaw2nd · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I guess you're right. I was thinking of the MicrosoftTV initiative.

  16. Possible MS Project Names by Popocatepetl · · Score: 3, Funny

    Microsoft is running out of destructive chemicals/materials to use as product codenames.

    Here are some suggestions so they can continue to innovate:

    Plutonium - the "most powerful" platform
    Asbestos - Microsoft's new embedded platform
    Acrylamide - for next generation restaurant machinery
    Lead Paint Chips - top-secret, pervasive computing initiative

    1. Re:Possible MS Project Names by haunebu · · Score: 1

      What about "Palladium"? Oh, wait...

      --

      Blue skies, Barthy Burgers, girls...

    2. Re:Possible MS Project Names by mpe · · Score: 2

      Plutonium - the "most powerful" platform

      How about Ununoctium? Which probably is chemically inert.

    3. Re:Possible MS Project Names by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      How about Ununoctium?

      Man-made and having a half-life of virtually milliseconds? It would also fit with their standard usefullness/upgrade curve.

    4. Re:Possible MS Project Names by dattaway · · Score: 2

      It gets better with Freon(tm). To most people, this is a cool gas, pretty much inert, and has good heat conductivity.

      Everyone knows about the potential to destroy the atmosphere by letting in the cancerous spectrum of UV, but there is a very deadly form of Freon. If Freon happens to be burned, it forms a mortally toxic acid and phosgene gas. If freon in your car were released and entered the engine's intake, the resulting exaust can wipe out bystanders.

      Its interesting Microsoft used Du Pont's Freon tradmark. Why? If you try to burn Freon on your computer, would there be certain death?

    5. Re:Possible MS Project Names by sharkey · · Score: 2

      MS Thalidomide - all-in-one fulfillment for your maternity needs.
      MS DDT - Official refills for the...
      MS XtREME Lawncare game, with respiratory-feedback controller.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    6. Re:Possible MS Project Names by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Unobtanium- Totally secure MS OS
      Sealed Bank Vault- New firewall system

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  17. Has it occured to anyone.... by mirnav · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ... that they probably named this product "freon" in a feeble attempt at establishing a connection between use of the product and being "free".... or something equally market-savvy and brain-dead.

    1. Re:Has it occured to anyone.... by mccalli · · Score: 2
      ... that they probably named this product "freon" in a feeble attempt at establishing a connection between use of the product and being "free".... or something equally market-savvy and brain-dead.

      I read it as them implying that the product is cool.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    2. Re:Has it occured to anyone.... by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      I read it as them implying that the product is cool.

      While on the inside they're hoping it has a chilling effect on the competition.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    3. Re:Has it occured to anyone.... by stalbott972 · · Score: 0

      another gentleman here in my office made the comment that since freon is a gaseous substance does that mean that Microsoft's new product is vaporware? Sorry had to be said!

      --
      Only 8 away from being prime (569919 - 569927) And mom told me I'm unique!!! Sheesh
    4. Re:Has it occured to anyone.... by Nick+Driver · · Score: 1

      No, I think they've named it "freon" probably because they've been huffing too much freon (inhalant abuse) and now have dain bramage from it.

  18. Lies, all lies by dimator · · Score: 2

    Interesting. According to this (note the URL, someone has a sense of humor) MS would turn down feature requests that didn't improve the Xbox's "gaming" performance/ability. I'm glad to see that that was all a lot of bull shit.

    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  19. Nah by af_robot · · Score: 1

    It will destroy any other equipment which may circumvent DRM in your living room.
    like VCR

  20. funny names by dago · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think that some of the marketing/PR people of MS have been sick / on holidays / away these times.

    Palladium : was originally the name of the statue of Pallas-Athenas, which was supposed to protect the city of Troie. Which was later invaded by greeks which used a subterfuge which will be known for centuries as trojan horses.

    Freon : according to this web page, apart from evident utility in refigerators, "Only decades later did people realize that such chlorofluorocarbons endangered the ozone layer of the entire planet." and, even worse for MS : "The trade name Freon® is a registered trademark belonging to E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company (DuPont)."

    --
    #include "coucou.h"
    1. Re:funny names by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, a lot of Microsoft's advertising belies a subtle sabotage by their PR types. Remember the Stones song whose refrain was "You make a grown man cry"? How about the Office ads with a requiem for a soundtrack? Or the way the Windows logo looks like it's going down/to crash?

      I definitely think that it's a subtle jab at clueless leaders, that the marketing types are playing jokes on the computer geeks that supposedly run the place.

      They were probably having trouble keeping a straight face as they suggested Freon. "Oh yeah, it'll connotate 'Free' and 'on'! (snicker) Um, I gotta go to another meeting! (burst of laughter as the door closes)"

    2. Re:funny names by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      Somebody mess with your anti-paranoid shot?

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
    3. Re: funny names by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Insightful


      > Palladium : was originally the name of the statue of Pallas-Athenas, which was supposed to protect the city of Troie. Which was later invaded by greeks which used a subterfuge which will be known for centuries as trojan horses.

      Funnier yet when you find out that some people think the Palladium was actually a gigantic dildo.

      No, stop, don't mod this up as 'funny' - I'm serious.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    4. Re:funny names by Vulture_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Perhaps Open Source is not the greatest threat to Microsoft after all. The great Roman empire was destroyed from within; the invaders from without merely finished it off. Perhaps we'll soon see a similar scenario here, where Open Source is merely a coup de grace?

      --

      The only way the typical /.er can pick up a chick is with a forklift. -- AC

    5. Re:funny names by iapetus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Strange though it seems, surely this can be the only explanation for an OS called 'winCE'...

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    6. Re:funny names by halftrack · · Score: 2

      When I think about palladium I think of it as a component used in producing nuclear weapons and it has got a radioactive isotop: Pd-103.

      --
      Look a monkey!
    7. Re:funny names by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      And I think of a precious metal that trades in ingot form for about the same prices as platinum.

    8. Re:funny names by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 1

      I've always been puzzled how that one got out. I mean, MS has to know that everyone shortens the Windows release name to WinXX, been doing is since Win31. Heck even the Win98 CDs have a directory named that.

      So how could they not see that the Compact Edition of Windows would not be called WinCE?

    9. Re:funny names by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 1

      I'm still waiting for Windows CEMENT. With the power of CE, the stablility of ME, and the user-freindlyness of NT.

    10. Re:funny names by zeno_2 · · Score: 2

      I found this gif that someone made, it was showing off the logo's for the following os's, Windows NT, Windows CE, and Windows ME..

      Together it made Windows CE ME NT, or Windows CEMENT.

    11. Re:funny names by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      Remember the Stones song whose refrain was "You make a grown man cry"? How about the Office ads with a requiem for a soundtrack?

      The OfficeXP commercial featured the start of the song "Lunatic Fringe" by Red Rider. I guess they were attempting to directly address their customers who are willing to buy the same product over again.

    12. Re:funny names by jmauro · · Score: 1

      "Only decades later did people realize that such chlorofluorocarbons endangered the ozone layer of the entire planet."

      Part of the reason that Freon was considered so dangerous, is that the patent was about to run out and instead of fighting it, DuPont lead the effort to get it banned so no one else could make money off of it. It was a very dangerous substance for the earth, but that really wasn't the reason why iy was banned. Maybe Microsoft is trying the same, coming up with a consumer product so horrible, they'll lead the effort to prevent any one else from ever copying it.

    13. Re:funny names by karmawarrior · · Score: 2
      No, it's because someone (whose name I forget, I'll have to look it up when I get home, but I don't recall any connection with DuPoint, and DuPont's patents would have already have run out by that point) developed the theory in the mid-seventies that as freon breaks up under UV light, and as there's lots of UV light in the ozone layer (by definition, that's the layer that blocks it) and ozone is very reactive, especially under UV, there was quite a good probability that the chlorine in it would come apart, react with the ozone, creating something else and resulting in a depletion of ozone.


      This is a very logical explanation, and meant a lot of research was done into finding out if the ozone layer really was depleting. Lo and behold, checks on the areas above the poles revealed a massive reduction in the following decade.


      I have a book of essays by one Isaac Asimov dating back to 1976, The Planet That Wasn't, which includes three chapters on ozone: it's discovery, it's importance in terms of how it made life on land possible, and, finally, a whole chapter on freon, what a fantastic substance it is (and it was), and ending on an explanation of how it might have one little flaw... with a comment to the effect of "It might be wise to reduce our usage of freon now rather than face a panic stop in ten years time."


      It's excellent and explains in terms even a politician could understand what the chemical processes involved are and it's head-slappingly-and-saying-of-course! convincing without being alarmist. But Asimov never was an alarmist or luddite, and his chapter on freon is positively enthusiastic about the stuff, which under normal circumstances is as toxic as nitrogen (ie not), highly compressable without high forces, and a good heat conductor, until the ending when he points out its suseptability to breakdown under UV.


      The book is still available, used, from Amazon's marketplace resellers. I recommend it.

      --
      KMSMA (WWBD?)
    14. Re:funny names by joyoflinux · · Score: 0

      Yep, it's available here: Microsoft's New Operating System. GIMPified and all :-)

    15. Re:funny names by zeno_2 · · Score: 2

      Yup that was it, I had a pretty good laugh when I first saw it.. =P

      Thanks for the link

    16. Re:funny names by macaddict · · Score: 1
      How about the Office ads with a requiem for a soundtrack?

      What's even funnier is that the translation of that bit of Mozart's Requiem is "When the accursed have been confounded and given over to the bitter flames,...", playing as the ad asks you "Where Do You Want to Go Today?"

      Apparently, using Microsoft products will send you to Hell. Go fig.

      Sara

    17. Re:funny names by Cognitive+Dissident · · Score: 1

      Look again. This is the internal code name not the product name it's going to be marketted under. If this is a leak how is MS going to be in any trouble for an informal use of a trademarked name?

    18. Re: funny names by esper_child · · Score: 1

      Isn't Palladium the game company that made the Robotech and Rifts games? Does this mean that they are trying to play on other groups Trademarks now?

    19. Re:funny names by BryanL · · Score: 0

      Actually Freon is a project code name. The box may never make it to market, and if it does it will have a different name.

    20. Re:funny names by haggar · · Score: 2

      Yeah, and what do you think about "Hailsrorm"? Maybe nobody noticed, but what is a hailstorm most likely to do? Shatter Windows! This seems to be one of their PR sabotages, too.

      BTW. Hailstorm, it so seems, has died.

      --
      Sigged!
    21. Re:funny names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thoght they were going to combine WinCE, WinME, and WinNT into a single OS, named, of course "CEMENT".

  21. This just in... by ferrocene · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Company makes product which is thought to increase revenue! Seriously, what's the point of this "news". Companys make products all the time, it doesn't mean you have to buy them or it will increase world domination. This is now law, it's consumer choice (ok, ok, there's that little "monopoly" thing"). But that's mostly MS-centric thinking.

    Word on the street - Nike to make new shoe; increases running speed!

    Kodak to make picutes more sentimental! Kodak moments to increase!

    Lexus is rumored to make an expensive-looking car, and charge a lot of money for it!

    What Linux (as a community) REALLY needs to do is create a sexy commercial featuring a scantily-clad Britney Spears doing an 'apt-get install' with wild camera angles and dance music. I'm thinking directed by Hype Williams, fish-eyed lens and all. Because we all know that advertising is the only REAL way to increase market share...or something. ;)
    Oh shit! The commercial will also have to feature this guy:
    http://www.thelinuxpimp.com/

    Trust me, no matter how monopolistic M$ will try to be (or is), teenagers will flock to a sexy OS.

    Hmmm...so this is a bit off-topic. The point is, new M$ products don't excite me or qualify as news. Unlike a sexy linux/tux commercial. Did I say sexy? 'Cause I meant sexy. As in sex. Sexy.

    "Uh, how about no, ok Scott?" -Dr. Evil

    --
    Most folk'll never lose a toe, and then again some folk'll...
    1. Re:This just in... by krmt · · Score: 2
      Unlike a sexy linux/tux commercial. Did I say sexy? 'Cause I meant sexy. As in sex. Sexy.
      Don't they show penguins having sex on the Discovery Channel or something? It's either that or Linus doing a hot little number, take your pick.
      --

      "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

    2. Re:This just in... by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 1


      What Linux (as a community) REALLY needs to do is create a sexy commercial featuring a scantily-clad Britney Spears doing an 'apt-get install' with wild camera angles and dance music. I'm thinking directed by Hype Williams, fish-eyed lens and all. Because we all know that advertising is the only REAL way to increase market share...or something. ;)


      Guy: "Well, the computers look good."
      Cow: "What computers?"

      --
      N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
  22. it not free-on at all by falsemover · · Score: 3, Funny

    Microsoft expect to lose money on the box and make on going money when you are on the net playing games or maybe just surfing with a souped up copy of Explorer. So it's not likely to be free-on at all.

    Some marketing genius says: well lets attack the negative and code name it Freon.
    another marketing genius says: but isn't freon an unpopular gas?
    the first marketing genius: But people will think that it is FREE ON, did you see what I did there? Did you see that?
    second genius:Hey, the number one marketing word is FREE. You are a genius.
    first genius (smug mode on): Hey, I'm living proof that Micro$oft recruit from the top.

    --
    consider coffee a lubricant that helps one penetrate the coding zone
    1. Re:it not free-on at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got this quite right - their initials are RM and NB. But a geniette, SC, put the icing on it.

      anon

  23. Stay free by Snart+Barfunz · · Score: 1

    Read books Go see live music Write letters Stick that up your DRM, Bill!

    --
    --- Yx3 = Delilah ---
  24. Another idea by af_robot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Microsoft Mercury Proxy Server: safe and solid solution for internet security

  25. Freon = Vapour Ware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Q: What happens when freon is in normal room temperature?

    A: It turns vapour

  26. toxicology by Cally · · Score: 2
    --
    "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
  27. Their strategy to kill all the penguins by jabapi · · Score: 1

    This must be their latest attempt to kill Linux by wiping out all the penguins from the planet using Freon.

    1. Re:Their strategy to kill all the penguins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG LOL tahts so funi i tihnk i wet mysefl!

  28. Step carefully... by weave · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Being quite an old flock()er, I can recallthe video game boom of late 70s early 80s. Atari was champ, then something happened. The market became too fractured. Atari 5200, Colecovision, and some others I can't remember. Then Atari announces 7800 shortly after 5200 was out and no one wanted to buy a 5200. Eventually, it all just died out.

    It wasn't until the NES rose out of the console market's ashes did things kick back in gear. One thing that was great about the NES was it was stable and long lived. The same goes for the next market leader, Playstation.

    Microsoft could very well risk killing the entire console market if it introduces too much confusion and churn into it. If they make consoles as complicated as PCs, a lot of buyers may just be turned off. Think of all the people, right down to the poorest you know, that have a console but no computer in their house.

    1. Re:Step carefully... by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      Hello? NES wasn't any more stable than the 2600 ... stability wasn't a problem.

      And, obviously it couldn't have been long lived as it rose out of the ashes (well, I guess it could, but it just wasn't, it was new, built in the ashes).

      [begin pulling things out of my ass]
      So, anyway, the NES kicked ass because it was a generation ahead of the other crap and they packaged SMB with it ... which immediately addicted everyone who looks twice at those things.
      [end]

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
    2. Re:Step carefully... by weave · · Score: 2
      NES wasn't any more stable than the 2600

      Damn the English language at times...

      By stable, I meant, consistent and long lived. The Atari 2600 came out in 1976 and was king for several years. The NES was the #1 console for ages as well. Having an unfragmented console market back then meant that all of your friends had the same system and you could haul your carts around, share, play together, etc...

      I just don't think the market can support too many consoles. My closet is full of short-lived failed consoles, like my 3DO, Dreamcast, and N64.

      Looks to me like PS2 is the winner this round. Just ask any kid who is current-generation consoleless what console they want.

    3. Re:Step carefully... by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      My closet is full of short-lived failed consoles, like my 3DO, Dreamcast, and N64.

      Lumping the N64 in with the 3DO and Dreamcast is just stupid. The thing had a 5-year lifespan, sold approximately 30 million units world-wide, was extremely profitable for Nintendo, and had dozens of titles that sold in the million-plus range, and many that sold 10 million-plus.

      The 3DO had a tiny install base -- mostly hobbyists. The Dreamcast sold relatively well, but was costing Sega more than they could afford to keep it afloat.

      If, by "failure," you mean "not the widest selling console," then yeah, the N64 was a failure, and probably the Gamecube and XBox will be too.

      Of course, Britney Spears sells more albums than Mr. Bungle, but does that make Mr. Bungle a failure? And does that mean I should consider myself to have good musical taste because I own the latest Britney Spears album?

      And as for the original post, about the "fractured" video game industry in the early 80's -- basically, Atari rose to the top and then sat there. They started releasing crappy, unoriginal games based on Movie licenses that were nothing more than blatant advertising vehicles. (E.T., anyone?) The other console makers saw an opportunity to make easy money by copying Atari, and didn't bring anything new to the table in the process, exacerbating the problem. People quit buying them because they were (at the time) smart enough to see the games for the garbage they were. It didn't have anything to do with there being "too many consoles."

      I'm just waiting for the same thing to happen again -- and amazed that it has taken so long. There's so much garbage on the market that unless you're dedicated to finding good games, you'd never know what to get.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    4. Re:Step carefully... by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

      It wasn't until the NES rose out of the console market's ashes did things kick back in gear. One thing that was great about the NES was it was stable and long lived. The same goes for the next market leader, Playstation

      Ummm no. SNES was the next market leader. Even though Sega Genesis came out first(4 months I believe), SNES still climbed to the top 'cause they had a lot of quality titles. However Megadrive(SG)doing quite well in Japan.

      One of the primary reasons why Playstation was the next leader was because of Nintendo's arrogance with N64 cartridge format(they made gobs of money on royalties from their 'custom' cartridge format and didn't want to lose it).

      Playstation2 is similar to SNES, as the current market leader. Recent stats show PS2 selling double of GC or Xbox(60K units vs 30K) in North America. In Japan, PS2 is dominating.

      Now whats interesting is: Who's the next NES or Playstation?

      PS. I'm glad M$ is getting smacked around the console market. Don't they know Halo isn't going to save them?

  29. The Future, Near and Far by krmt · · Score: 2

    This article didn't really say a whole lot about where things are headed. Lots of speculation, but I'm sure the X-Box team doesn't know a whole lot themselves yet. I'm still not convinced that the hard drive is really worthwhile for the price range. I can see some benefits for online gaming, but with sufficient RAM it shouldn't be a necessity.

    I think the idea of replacing the TV with the X-Box is a really good one for a lot of obvious reasons, but unless they provide a CD or DVD burner, there's no way I'd toss my VCR. You simply want to archive stuff (favorite episodes and such), and if you've got an X-Box hard drive full of MP3's or whatever, you're not going to want to go around deleting things prematurely. If they make it in to a full TiVO-like service and provide a really huge hard drive (and a burner too!) they would have a potentially killer product on their hands.

    I think what'll be really interesting is to see whose online gaming model will play out better. Sony's model is more anarchic, while Microsoft's is better planned and more centralized. Kind of like the difference between Id and Blizzard. In my experience, the random Quake server is a hell of a lot better than a Battle.net game of Starcraft, but we'll see if this will extend to console-based online gaming.

    I'm betting that the online gaming thing won't become critical at least until the PS3 hits. It's pretty much a fringe thing right now, but I have no doubt that it'll become much more important once the console makers really get their acts together. Still, I always think of console gaming as being a lot more social than computer gaming, with a bunch of people clustered around the TV playing Smash Bros or Goldeneye to be more likely than a bunch of people clustered around a hub playing Quake on their own monitors. Because of this, I'm betting less people will feel the need to hit the network to play games when they can just call a few friends to come over and play.

    Munching tacos and swilling soda while beating your friends to pulp is a lot more fun when they're right there next to you doing it too.

    --

    "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

  30. we all know what a disaster Freon was... try again by Daniel+Quinlan · · Score: 5, Interesting
    When Freon was introduced, it replaced very dangerous/poisonous/explosive chemicals (such as ammonia) which caused a number of fatal accidents.

    I remember an anecdote about a du Pont employee demonstrating the safety of the chemical by inhaling a good breath of Freon and blowing it out to extinguish a candle, demonstrating that it was both non-toxic and not explosive. Try that with ammonia!

    Even if it may have had an impact on the ozone layer, there's more than just the safety component of the refrigerant chemical to consider. Where would food safety and preservation be without refrigeration? Without refrigeration, say hello to E. Coli and friends. Get used to salt-curing, preservatives, and freeze drying (yum). And then say goodbye to fresh seafood, out-of-season produce, frozen pizza, and a lot of the food that we eat.

    Here's an article about the history of Freon and another about the history of the refrigerator. (Oops, it wasn't just a du Pont employee who did the demo, it was the actual inventor... sounds like a lot of technology demos.)

  31. It would be great if.......... by phunhippy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would find it highly amusing if someone managed to crack the XBOX & write PVR software for it as well :) since it has the HD on it already..

    1. Re:It would be great if.......... by theRhinoceros · · Score: 2

      That would require the Xbox having a video-in port of some kind, which IIRC, it does not have.

    2. Re:It would be great if.......... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would require the Xbox having a video-in port of some kind, which IIRC, it does not have.

      minor details ;)

  32. xbox as VCR by Joseph+Lam · · Score: 2, Funny

    Son: Dad can I play Halo now?

    Dad: boy don't touch my little Freon tonite

    Son: (WTF...)

    Dad: I've scheduled recording of Britney show

    Son: ...but it ran out of disc space last night already. I told you to clean up those pRoN thing...

    1. Re:xbox as VCR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. You need to continue in your study of English and writing. When you enter 9th grade next Fall pay special attention to when they talk about sentences.

      2. People don't store 'pRoN' on set-top boxes. That's what the hard drives in computers are used for.

      3. Adults with children old enough to play video games don't watch Brittney Spears.

      4. Households with the new X-Box in the living room generally have the old X-Box down in the rec room for the kids.

  33. $500 is just the start by will_die · · Score: 1

    Don't forget the $10 charge for the TV listing and the charge for Xbox live. However under a combined box it would be stupid to have theses as seperate charges so expect a single around $20+ monthly charge which contains both. So now when you get sick of playing the game online you still have to pay for that to get your TV listings. And the even better thing is now you cannot sent the kids off to another room to play games while you want to watch your recorded shows. Overall they are just wrapping two failed products in a bright bow, and fooling some people.

  34. Will it be still sold at loss? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I mean, one thing is selling a game console at loss -- you can license games, and another thing is to sell at loss a device that is perfectly capable of independent operation. And if they expect that they can tie PVR to a mandatory subscription, their worst enemy would be a... PC.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  35. needs a different name. by Rhinobird · · Score: 2

    Freon just isn't cool enough for me (*cough*)

    How about:
    CFC
    Ozone destroyer
    Aerosol
    cancer box?
    Defender of capitalism against the demon hordes of cancerous GPL software?
    F-box
    money-pit
    DRM testbed
    We Control Your TV Set
    Tivo+
    What were we making again?

    I'm sure someone will be able to come up with more names.

    --
    If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
    1. Re:needs a different name. by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      Or... 'All Your Base Are Belong To Us'

    2. Re:needs a different name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The UltimateTV++X-Box#.NET

    3. Re:needs a different name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The UltimateTV++X-Box#.NET-XP2000GTiTurbo2

  36. Re:xnigger by dcstimm · · Score: 1

    only rednecks and idiots would have thought that up and posted it.

  37. Are they nuts?! by prockcore · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is really quite amazing to me. Microsoft truly is the most braindead company.

    Why in the world would anyone buy an xbox now? We now know it's going to be replaced with "something much much better" in a little while.

    Now instead of making money selling xbox's and xbox games, everyone will just hold on to their cash and wait for Freon(tm).

    In the meantime xbox-exclusive game makers will bleed red, and drop support for the xbox.. when Freon actually makes it out the door, it'll have no games because the game makers aren't going to invest the time and money on a product that already burned them once.

    Freon will kill all of MS's hopes in the console market. And you can bookmark me on that.

    1. Re:Are they nuts?! by larien · · Score: 2

      Hrm, aren't PS1s still selling despite "something much much better" being available now? Perhaps that's died off a little, but ISTR that the PS1 was selling better than the Xbox, certainly in Japan (but that's a weird market anyway...).

    2. Re:Are they nuts?! by Salsaman · · Score: 2
      Great ! So when we get Linux on the xbox, we'll have tons of discounted hardware to run it on.

      Go Microsoft !

    3. Re:Are they nuts?! by night_flyer · · Score: 2

      the PSone is only 49.99, thats why it is still selling... that and there are about a zillion games out there for it...

      --


      Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
      Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    4. Re:Are they nuts?! by plumby · · Score: 2

      But that is probably down to two factors. The PS1 has vast amounts of software available to it (admittedly much of it is pretty poor), and it is £50, and therefore almost a impulse buy. I suspect many of the people that are buying them are parents after a cheap console, with large amounts of software to choose from, to keep their kids happy. An X-Box, with few titles in comparison, and with a price tag of £200 is probably out of reach of these sort of buyers.

    5. Re:Are they nuts?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or people will stop buying Playstation2's and Game Cubes thinking "ooh, Freon is coming soon!"

      JK

    6. Re:Are they nuts?! by tlh1005 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well that depends on what your perception of a "little while is". Assuming this article is correct and things won't change timetable and market wise, (A BIG ASSUMPTION) an improved version of the Xbox console will not be released until approx 2005. This isn't any different than what Sony plans to do, and has done in the past. The way I read the article Freon is only an Xbox with additional NON-gaming features like the PVR. MS may lose based on the initial problems of when they released the Xbox but I can't see them losing more just by adding a PVR next year or so.

      I've got a PS2 and I think its the better machine, but admittedly I am partial to Sony products, I know they have a larger market share on game titles, and also I haven't been exposed to playing the Xbox. I'm not an MS junkie and Kudos to anyone who can do anything better... but really, whats the point in always expecting or wanting them to fail. I for one would rather see them produce better products :-)

    7. Re:Are they nuts?! by rnd() · · Score: 2
      the prices are different... so what you're really asking is "Why would someone want to save $300?".

      This is no different than buying hardware: There will always be something better. Why do people buy the latest and greatest hardware when they will surely be able to get better hardware for the same price (or a substantial price reduction on the same hardware) a few months?

      Logic, anyone?

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

    8. Re:Are they nuts?! by tlh1005 · · Score: 1

      The PS1 is also very old. This is not a valid comparison because eventually we know the Xbox will have a larger game selection and will also be as cheap as the PS1. Can you really tell me the Xbox 3 years from now at ~$50 isn't a better bargain than the PS1 at $50 today? I'm as big of a PS2 person as the next guy but please you guys, I feel like an MS spokesman here.

    9. Re:Are they nuts?! by larien · · Score: 2
      I'm not as sure as you seem to be that the Xbox will have a larger game selection. Added to this, in 3 years time, there will be better consoles (MS or not) which means that the Xbox will be looking dated and will only be worth the $50 it will be sold at, i.e. it'll be about the same value.

      In any event, the point is that an old console is still selling well despite their being better consoles out there, which is the point I was trying to make.

    10. Re:Are they nuts?! by tlh1005 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you totally about the PS1. While the Xbox doesn't interest ME at all for now though, I could def. see it being desireable to others down the road at ~$50.... as a game machine and a hacked box running any of the code people are trying to get to run on it right now (linux, Mame etc).

    11. Re:Are they nuts?! by fferreres · · Score: 2

      "... game makers aren't going to invest the time and money on a product that already burned them once."

      Hey wait, they have ALWAYS waited for Microsoft to "get it right this time". They only get it right in the third iteration or so (Office 95, DirectX 6, Windows 98SE, etc, etc.).

      Why do I have this feeling that your prediction will miserably fail?

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    12. Re:Are they nuts?! by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      I'm with you. I honestly don't see MS forcing Sony out of the market, so why not support a worthy contender?

      Besides, if nothing else, this will encourage Sony to make quicker work of bringing out a better product of their own.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    13. Re:Are they nuts?! by tlh1005 · · Score: 1

      THANKYOU It is so nice to see an unbiased opinion on here sometimes.

  38. Seems obvious to me by rattler14 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Every time there is an article about microsoft trying to take over our living rooms, everyone freaks out and no one can seem to understand why they are so desperate to do such a thing.

    Well, simply put, they have to. Microsoft is a huge company, used to churning out huge profits. That was all fine and dandy as long as they could continue to create (or copy, incoporate, etc) new operating systems and software packages that people would continually purchase on a somewhat regular basis (every software/hardware cycle). The problem that they seem to be facing over the past few years is that NO ONE wants to upgrade their systems anymore. Their software, a huge part of their profits, has reached a point where users are quite happy (i know, how sad to be happy with their products) with them. SO, no matter how many rebates or promotions they offer, there are still a lot of computers out their running windows 2000 and even 98 and NT4. Why? Cause the new features that office XP has are worthless to many people.

    So, how does this all tie in? Microsoft needs to find a new way to generate continual profits. It can't push people into buying software upgrades as they could in years past. The only way they will be able to sustain this money influx is to expand to new markets (video games, TV, various website services) as well as try and charge monthly costs for their OS (i believe that they are still trying to do so).

    So, stop being suprised about all of this. It's gonna happen. And if you don't like it, don't buy their products/services. They currently don't have dominance in these other markets, and they won't as long as people don't buy all of their crap.

    --
    my last sig was too controversial... now, a new and improved useless sig!
  39. Just think of the potential! by robolemon · · Score: 1
    Microsoft Exec: So this device allows our customers to record themselves playing Halo to show off to their friends?

    XBox Engineer: Oh, um, well we forgot about that feature.

    Microsoft Exec: OK, hmm, can we release a software patch?

    XBox Engineer: We'd love to, but we've lost the source code.

    Microsoft Exec: What happened to it?!

    XBox Engineer: Well you made us store it with Digital Rights Management, but there was a bug in the DRM server and...

    Microsoft Exec: Blah blah blah! That means nothing to me. (Divine Inpsiration) Hey!!! What do you think about this... We can make a cable that takes the output from the XBox and inputs it into the TiVo thingy!

    XBox Engineer: Well, that should work...

    Microsoft Exec: Man, we could probably sell something like that for 50 bucks a pop!

    --

    I design user interfaces for a free network management application,

  40. Re:we all know what a disaster Freon was... try ag by HFXPro · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The process that happens inside a refrigeration system is based on physics. It does not matter which gas. In fact, water, alchohol, and even good old CO2 all can be used as refrigerents and do just a good a job cooling food as Freon did. Well, I should note that water wouldn't be that good for freezing stuff, however for cooling you house it would work fine.

    Why do these all work fine? Because they are based on physics. Physics which say temperature and pressure are directly related. Physics which say that as a substance changes state it must either gain heat or loose heat. That said, there are many substances which can be used safely in place of Freon.

    That said, I should note that many new refrigerents can be quite flammable under certain conditions. Plus lets not forget what CFC based refrigents do to the ozone layer. A problem much worse for everyone then the ammonia.
    --
    Reserved Word.
  41. Recorded BSOD by nvainio · · Score: 3, Funny
    Freon will be capable of 'playing games but also offering television capabilities, such as pausing live TV and recording shows onto a computer hard drive.'

    Does this mean that I will get three hours of recorded Blue screen of Death on my hard disk?

    1. Re:Recorded BSOD by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Actually, I may be wrong, but I think the DishPVR 501 is based on a microsoft core, and I have gotten 7 hour recordings of a black screen before. That thing is buggy and slow as hell. At least the next DishPVR is linux based.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  42. Re:Freon worked better than R-134a by tRoll+with+Butter · · Score: 1

    The true disaster is owning a vehicle that uses freon (Also known by its generic name of R-12) and having to retrofit it to use R-134a (the same gas used in those "dust blaster" canned "air"). Most automotive air conditioners designed to use R-12 have inadequate condenser cooling capacity for R-134a and perform poorly after a retrofit. Don't believe me? Do a search on Google, it's true.

    It is quite possible that Microsoft's use of Freon is a nostalgic refrence to "The Good Old Days" when women were homemakers, McDonalds burgers were kept toasty warm by styrofoam, insect poison was actually toxic, school shootings didn't exist and your air conditioning actually got *cold*.

    Or maybe it's an analogy... If you consider Tivo as R-134a and Microsoft as Freon, does that mean Microsoft's offering is more expensive, bad for the enviorment, but much more appealing from a performence standpoint?

    --

    ---
    Siggy, siggy, siggy, can't you see? Sometimes your puns just irritate me.
  43. Did you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That the letters in "Microsoft Freon" can be rearranged to spell "Force fist moron". Telling, isn't it?

  44. The ironic thing about Freon by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 2, Informative

    Freon, the chemical, represents a moneymaking scheme that Bill Gates can only have wet dreams about.

    See, the patents that DuPont held to the Freon compound expired in 1992... the same year the UN adopted a treaty banning the use of CFC-based refrigerants with support from DuPont and a lot of enviro-hype. The approved refrigerant, HFC-134a, is less efficient, highly toxic, and protected by exclusive patents owned by DuPont.

    It's a bit like if Microsoft somehow got a law passed declaring Windows 98 illegal, and requiring all users to upgrade to Windows XP, replete with customs agents stopping smugglers of legitimate, but now contraband, Windows 98 copies at the border.

    Believe me guys, MS is just small-time evil. Quasi-evil. Not evil enough.

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
    1. Re:The ironic thing about Freon by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Speaking of, right now recycled Freon is legal but expensive, but virgin Freon is cheap, so the mafia is running illegal virgin Freon in the US, from news reports I have read.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  45. Re:we all know what a disaster Freon was... try ag by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    The process that happens inside a refrigeration system is based on physics. It does not matter which gas. In fact, water, alchohol, and even good old CO2 all can be used as refrigerents and do just a good a job cooling food as Freon did. Well, I should note that water wouldn't be that good for freezing stuff, however for cooling you house it would work fine.

    Yet if you paid attention in your grade 9 science class you would have learned that not all chemicals work easily as well.

    The process of refridgeration depends on a gas that expands quickly. When it expands it absorbs heat then you condense it elsewhere to let go of the heat.

    freon apparently fit the bill since it had a nice efficiency behind it.

    So the choices at the time were bad for environment freon or bad for the environment non-freon [recall wasting electricity is in fact bad for the environment].

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  46. OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    which genius widened the page?

  47. weak name by mieses · · Score: 2, Funny

    maybe someone at MS was impressed by the cool gassy names the SGI Octane, O2, and Fuel but the best they could come up with was Freon.

    Freon seems much more passive than the sgi names. but it is for couch-potatoes after all..

  48. One interesting point from the article.. by gusnz · · Score: 2
    ...[The XBox's] costs are believed to be higher than Sony's, partly because of the hard drive and a version of its powerful Windows operating system included with each machine.
    I can't help but wonder how much Microsoft is paying to license the "powerful Windows operating system" for each machine from itself. Development costs will surely have been an issue, but using it to explain the current loss is stretching it a little.

    Anyway, the article is quite a good overview of the current console scene. I can't help but wonder, however, if Microsoft's "go it alone" strategy is the best choice, or whether they'd be better off licensing gaming technology to other manufacturers as they are planning for WMV (see link). It would reduce financial risk to them, mirrors their current strategy for OS dominance in the personal computer industry, and Nintendo has started to do this with its GameCube (Panasonic DVD/Gamecube combo). Or would this wind up suffering the same fate as the Nuon chipset?
  49. MS launching probing attacks into a new sector by Aliks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Xbox offers benefits to many parts of MS, and the investment necessary to establish a beachhead is small compared what they could win.

    It seems clear that there is a huge marketplace in the home entertainment / home management space. The traditional PC / laptop and Office type apps aren't going to take this area by storm so some new thinking is needed.

    First off it isn't clear what will turn out to be the paradigm shifter. New ways to run e-mail? Video interaction with chat groups over broadband? New games? Management of CD music centre? TiVo style access to TV content? Automating household security and energy management?

    Any or all of these could be the key, but maybe something not on this list at all. The big thing for MS is to leverage current strengths to absolutely dominate the space they target.

    From this point of view they need to establish a new common platform for H/W, S/W and comms under MS control.

    Xbox offers

    * A foothold in the livingroom via a games console, with a cashflow attached

    * Testing out of the control technologies that will be needed to enforce a monopoly:

    * Xbox architecture for coupling the OS and hardware so that only controlled, approved apps can run

    * The chance to test out DRM and distribution apps (at least in the next Xbox release)

    * MS mediation of interactive services, e-mail home shopping etc that are currently set top box based

    * A viable platform for whatever does turn out to be the killer app/service in the home

    A lot of people would love to see these kind of services up and running, but lack the muscle to do it on their own. If MS can ship enough Xbox class machines they should be able to attract third parties to deliver whats necessary (within MS rules of course)

    Whatever happens I'm sure that Xbox and derivatives will not be money down the drain for MS

  50. Codename: Freon by Ichimusai · · Score: 1

    I have a feeling that the name at least partly relates to the Nuon box. I don't know if any of you have seen the Nuon box, but Jeff Minter has done a substantial amount of work on it...

    --
    -- ICQ: 1645566 Yahoo: Ichimusai MSN: Ichimusai http://www.ichimusai.org/
  51. Microsoft strong point: STABILITY by ishark · · Score: 2

    "Hassium" - solid stable servers.

    (Hassium has a 2.0ms half-life).

  52. Cool! by jimbolaya · · Score: 1

    Freon sounds really cool. Ha, ha, get it? Freon? Cool? Okay, so it was pretty lame, but this is the first, last, and only time you'll hear me call something from Microsoft cool, so you better enjoy it!

    --

    There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

  53. x-box tv advertising? by pubjames · · Score: 2

    I don't have a games console, I've probably out-grown them - the last one I brought was a Sega Megadrive. But some of the TV/cinema ads I've seen recently have tempted me - a great one for Final Fantasy X on the PlayStation, and various ads for Nintendo games. I've also seen some great ads for PlayStation games at the cinema.

    What I don't understand is - Microsoft say they are investing a few billion on the X-Box over the next few years - but where are the ads? Maybe it's different in the USA, but in the parts of Europe I frequent I've seen hardly any X-Box advertising recently. There was a burst of TV ads at the launch, but now virtually nothing.

    I'll admit to not being as brilliant a businessman as Bill Gates, but I can't help thinking that spending a bit more on regular and compelling TV advertising might be a better idea than adding more functionality to the X-Box hardware.

    What's happening with console advertising in other parts of the world?

  54. DRM? by bigbadwlf · · Score: 2

    recording shows onto a computer hard drive

    Sure... but only if the production company says you can.

    Given their plans for "Palladium" and the EULA for the WMP service pack, does anyone think this thing isn't gonna be chock full o' DRM?

  55. Re:Stable (as in...) by Calomnious+Awkward · · Score: 1

    Is this a plea for a "stable" market, similar to the stable windows market ?
    What you're talking about is a monopoly based on proprietary formats.
    The real solution is an open format for games. A cartridge/CD/DVD that can be played on all consoles.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas un sig
  56. MS-NBC's Impartial Reporting by DiscoBiscuit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "The Xbox console isn't profitable for the Redmond, Wash., company and its costs are believed to be higher than Sony's, partly because of the hard drive and a version of its powerful Windows operating system included with each machine" ROFL!!! Powerful!??? As ever MSNBC continues to show its dedication to impartial, unbiased reporting.

  57. combo-x-box? by geoff+lane · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Will it record TV while playing a game?

    Probably not.

    Pointless.

    1. Re:combo-x-box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it is like my 1-year old computer (with which I watch TV and record TV programs) it won't let you do this. Mine has 2 vid-cards (one for vid-capture and TV, the other's a GeForce for display, games, etc...) however the software I use strongly advise not to push the computer too far (i.e.: play games, convert video, etc...) when recording TV.

      Will the XBOX2 -or rather XBOX1.5- include 2 vid cards ?

      Probably not.

  58. We're not the target market by matrim99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Besides the TV, let's look at all the extra "stuff" the average person can hook up to their "Honme Entertainment System": 5.1 Stereo & speakers, Cable/Sat box, DVD, VCR1/2, Tivo-like recording device, game console. You can buy each of those "add-ons" for under $200 at the most, so they're attainable to your "average" consumer.

    Do you realize what a major pain in the ass it would be to hook up all those separate devices for your average person who can't even figure out how to program their VCR's clock? *THAT* will stop the masses from buying some (or all) of those components, not the cost. Read: loads of average people who WANT to spend their cash on these add-ons, but won't because the entry knowledge is simply too much for them to bother learning.

    This is where the "do everything" boxes come in. All you have to do is plug in perhaps 4 wires, all color-coded, and *viola*! Instant home entertainment center with all the bells and whistles.

    Now your average /. reader won't go for these all-in-one boxes, because we are willing to deal with the learning/troubleshooting curve to get everything hooked up correctly in order to get the *exact* components that we want.

    For every /. reader, or "home-entertainment buff", there are at least 100 people who just want to plug in a few wires and *have the darn thing work*. It's with that majority that the big bucks are.

    --
    Right. No, your other right. No, the other other right.
  59. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Opera too. Damn CLIT.

  60. Unstoppable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Is there no one on this planet who can challenge me?!" - General Zod, from the movie "Superman II"

  61. Where have I heard this before? by fw3 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Though it is unclear whether such a product will ever be built, its core concept appears to have the backing of Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates, who wrote in an internal memorandum in January

    So much for other companies trying to raise funding to develop products in this market.

    Oft-observed MS behavior:

    • see a new technology;
    • (sidebar: contact nascent developers of the new tecnology and express interest in 'partnership', get a feel for their approach);
    • write press release announcing newest MS brainstorm, including vagues statements about timing;
    • watch competition die off;
    • maybe develop the technology, maybe not
    --
    Linux is Linux, if One need clarify their dist: <Dist>/GNU Linux
    bsds are of course just BSD
    1. Re:Where have I heard this before? by freeBill · · Score: 2

      My addenda are not in italics:

      Oft-observed MS behavior:

      • see a new technology
      usually when developers start calling their developer assistance lines with code that should work according to the API documentation;

      (sidebar: contact nascent developers of the new technology and express interest in 'partnership,' get a feel for their approach) allowing architecture and marketing people at MS to get a clear idea of the philosophy behind the code they already have in their possession;

      write press release announcing newest MS brainstorm, including vague statements about timing while rewriting code to take advantage of undocumented hooks to more solid and efficient parts of the Windows API;

      watch competition die off or release a new version of Windows in which the actual innovators' code won't run, but the secret-API code will;

      maybe develop the technology, maybe not or promise Version 2.0 will have all the things people want, but can only get from the original innovator

      --
      Eternal vigilance only works if you look in every direction.
    2. Re:Where have I heard this before? by Eryq · · Score: 2

      How to deal with these PR releases, then?

      Simple. Just ignore them, and do what you were planning to do before they came out. And convince others to do likewise.

      Remember, the MS PR dept is not telling you what the company will actually do... it's telling you what they want investors (and competitors) to think it's going to do.

      Yes, this is true for all companies, but MS seems say "oh, us too, we do that" more often than most, perhaps precisely for the "watch competition die off" point you mention.

      Heck, if you can hang in there long enough, MS will probably eliminate most of your competition for you, then hopefully get bored and move onto promoting their Next Big Thing.

      --
      I'm a bloodsucking fiend! Look at my outfit!
  62. Ooooooh, I just can't wait... by RobinH · · Score: 2, Troll

    Ooooooh, I just can't wait until I can get Nimda on my Television!

    --
    "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
  63. Re:Stable (as in...) by weave · · Score: 1

    Good point, and I agree. If there was an open format with interchangable games between platforms, I would define that as stable as well. I just don't see that happening. :(

  64. Re:we all know what a disaster Freon was... try ag by snatchitup · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not to mention the fact that Freon is compatible with the compressors they operate in. It doesn't corrode like the others mentioned.

    I heard a story on Freon in that if you check it out. The patent is expiring, or has expired. The company owning the patent (Dupont?) for fear of losing liscensing revenue has invented a new refrigerant and lobbied alongside the Greenie Weenies to outlaw Freon.

    Follow the $'s dummy.

  65. Re:Stable (as in...) by thona · · Score: 1

    I dont think it is a plea. It was only a statement of historical facts. Given that Consoles are extremely propietary, way moer than Windows (ii.e. you need permission from the producer to publish somethine, you need to buy extremely expensive development environments) and may also be extremely separate and distinct in their hardware, a non-uniform market does severly hamper sales.

    With Windows you DO have a monopoly right now, BUT (a) everyone can publish for windows, the tools etc. dont cost that much (seriously - get proving for a Playstation 2 for Developers and THEN tell me that VIsual Studio is expensive) and there is no competition and will not be competition on hardware for a long time. Linux vs. Windows on games would still mean the same hardware basis.

    As games are normally not playable on later versions of the console etc. upgrades to the console mean a lot more for the user than computer upgrades. A stable product line, thus, is encouraging sales to consoles, while an announced sucessor can kill sales on the current line.

    The retrospective look that basically the market got killed when it fragmented and had to recover through a monopole is correct. Being able to lend out games and to get games from friends is a great factor for consoles.

    MS, though, has some advantages here - as their system is built on standard computer components, they may be able to maintain compatibility for software.

  66. Disaster by ONOIML8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "...we all know what a disaster the actual chemical Freon was."

    Big assumption there cuz I don't know about any disaster. I do know that Freon had some very important uses in refrigeration and electronics which saved lives and improved the quality of life for millions.

    How about just reporting the news without the emotional enviromental bullshit panic phrases. Thanks.

    --
    . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
    1. Re:Disaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're an idiot, even by slashdot standards.

    2. Re:Disaster by Lordrashmi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually your the one who is lacking intelligence. Dupont, the patent holders on Freon started the incredible shit storm surrounding it just as there patent was about to expire. If they had let it simply expire, any company would have been able to manufacture it, introducing competition which would have hurt Duponts monopoly.

      So what does dupont do? Simple, tell everyone that Freon will destroy the world, get it banned and introduce a replacement. Voila, they have a safe monopoly again.

    3. Re:Disaster by borgasm · · Score: 1

      Acutally, Freon was proven to be harmful to the environment. The CFC's do a number on that lovely canopy we call our atmosphere.

      Substances such as R12 and R134 do not have the detremental effect.

      Sure the cost of conversion for older freon systems is a little pricy, but for a few new O-rings and tubes, I'll dump that harmful stuff.

      I'm also wondering how it has saved lives.

      And I'm also assuming cuz = because. I could be wrong.

    4. Re:Disaster by Dutchmaan · · Score: 2

      How silly of all those scientists to have come up with reproducible chemical equations showing how harmful Freon is...

      ..and all along it was Dupont marketing protecting their monopoly... I feel so foolish. Thank you for letting me see the light.

    5. Re:Disaster by Lordrashmi · · Score: 1

      Not saying that Freon was good for you, but it wasn't as bad as everyone made it out to be.

    6. Re:Disaster by torndorff · · Score: 1

      I do think that without MY old Freon A/C and frig I would have died in the heat wave of `97 ;)

      Or maybe I need to go outside.

    7. Re:Disaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Old people tend to die when it gets really hot.

      Not to mention people in hospitals that make be weak (from whatever) and suffer or die from the heat.

      A/C saves lives.

    8. Re:Disaster by CTachyon · · Score: 1
      Substances such as R12 and R134 do not have the detremental effect.

      Actually, R12 is even worse. Both R-12 (CCl2F2) and R-22 (CHClF2) contain chlorine, and the reason chlorine catalyzes the destruction of ozone but fluorine does not is that fluorine doesn't readily bond with large numbers of oxygen radicals but chlorine forms ClO4 without so much as yawning.

      --
      Range Voting: preference intensity matters
  67. If it did Quicken and a handful of other apps ... by BitMan · · Score: 2

    Then Microsoft would have a seller! I've written on this before.

    I don't know why Microsoft doesn't take advantage of its PC dependence and use that to keep them on the Windows platform. I mean, if you've got the capabilities in the unit, why not exploit them as much as you can? Especially in a set top unit that would be easier to maintain than a PC, but will do everything that 50% of what homes need?

    Sure, there are issues with the screen display, but when it comes to balancing your checkbook, checking your on-line porforlio, writing simple letters, and a few other details that a good 50% of homes use, it's sufficient. Most of us /.'ers will still have a PC, but most home users aren't as savvy. A set-top box would be much better, since the PC is far too much more them. They just want gaming, TV recording, Internet browsing, checkbook balancing, investment tracking and writing letters -- nothing more. Heck, if it ran Quicken, I'd probably buy it (a 100% Linux user, both at work and home, for the last 4 years!).

    I don't know why I'm the only one that seems to see this? I also don't know why Nokia or some other company in the TV Linux Alliance hasn't been able to team up with AT&T, the regional Bells, etc... to offer such a Linux-based "set-top box" for their cable (or, limitedly, DSL) subscribers yet. I've heard rumors, but nothing solid yet. If Microsoft wants to "take over," it should make a move on this. But, instead, it looks like they'll keep doing the "minimum required" combined with "dumping" and losing to other vendors again and again and again at a huge loss. And they probably won't wake up until someone else has a 50% marketshare with one of these devices either.

    --
    -- Bryan "TheBS" Smith
    Independent Author, Consultant and Trainer
  68. a bad workman... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Damn the English language at times...

    A bad workman blames his tools.

    1. Re:a bad workman... by MyHair · · Score: 1

      >>Damn the English language at times...

      >A bad workman blames his tools.

      Actually I think it's the Slashdot rush that's to blame: "I've got to get this typed and posted quickly before someone else says the same thing and I get modded down for being redundant!" So people (or at least I) make stupid grammar and spelling mistakes or just word ideas poorly.

      Oh, okay, maybe it's our egos that are to blame.

      Or blame Sue. After all, she made the cosutmes.

    2. Re:a bad workman... by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Sue! That beeyatch!

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
  69. Marketing sabotage? by markmoss · · Score: 2

    I've long suspected that MS marketing had been infiltrated by Linux and Mac fanatics. That it still sells just proves how damned little these fanatics understand about users and corporate purchasing decisions...

    OTOH, maybe MS has a large secret slushfund to hire people to post utterly over-the-top pro-Linux messages and make the real Linuxers look like idiots. And to write Linux how-to's that take you through a dozen typed commands when most distros have a simple GUI program to do the same thing in 3 mouse clicks.

  70. One of the rejected slogans . . . by div_2n · · Score: 1

    "Freon, not to be confused with moron, gives Bill Gates a hard-on and helps half-witted geeks get their groove on!"

    1. Re:One of the rejected slogans . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hm. Well. No, decidedly unfunny.

  71. blatant reporting bias by ProfKyne · · Score: 1

    The Xbox console isn't profitable for the Redmond, Wash., company and its costs are believed to be higher than Sony's, partly because of the hard drive and a version of its powerful Windows operating system included with each machine.

    Oh yes -- it is very unprofitable to ship a powerful version of the Windows operating system. A big investment on Microsoft's part. That set them back quite a bit I'll reckon. (What??)

    While "the Xbox is a full-feature BMW, the PS2 is a Toyota,"

    Yeah, maybe. The Xbox is a 318ti, and the PS2 is a Toyota Supra.

    Sorry, MSNBC, but that is ridiculous. And I realize the quote came from an executive at InfoGrames -- of course an executive at a company with an interest in porting its PC titles to the console market is interested in the Xbox.

    --
    "First you gotta do the truffle shuffle."
    1. Re:blatant reporting bias by fizzychicken · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Although I agree that MSNBC is totally biased, I've got to correct you about your estimation of the PS2 vs XBox.

      I'm a console programmer, and I've worked on both the PS2 and the XBox. The libraries included with the XBox are a load better than the ones included with the PS2. As is the hardware. XBox kicks PS2 on everything but fill-rate.

      The dev-kit is also cheaper, and comes with a full suite of dev tools - something the PS2 dev-kit doesn't do. As much as MS get's deserved grief here on /. it's dangerous to ignore the facts.

      --
      'Those who will not reason, are bigots, those who cannot are fools, and those who dare not, are slaves.' - George Gordon
    2. Re:blatant reporting bias by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      MSNBC's reporter bias is completely offset by /. comment bias. It all ends up even in the end. :)

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    3. Re:blatant reporting bias by Phil+Wilkins · · Score: 2

      > XBox kicks PS2 on everything but fill-rate...

      ...user base, manufacturing costs, spatial efficiency, game library, size of developer community.

      As another console programmer, I'd agree that the PS2 tools are still playing catch-up with the x-box tools. However, since the market for PS2 games is like 10 times the size of that for the x-box, the development costs for a PS2 title could be up to 10 times that of an x-box title and it'd still be more profitable in terms of return on investment. (NB this is an incredibly crude analysis, but the fundamentals are important).

      Oh, and the x-box is in no way a beemer (the 'cube is the beemer in this metaphor), much more like a cadillac. Big, expensive, over-specced, looks much more impressive than it actually is.

  72. Re:Stable (as in...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    way morer !

    Monopole !

    I love it

    LOL

  73. DISCLAIMER by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    we - M$ - claim all the right to install updates on your television. Also we can, shall and will block programs we don't like.

    furthermore, if your dvd-player, vhs or gameconsole is not 100% M$ compatible we have the right to block the signal. Purely to protect the tv's hardware ofcourse. This has nothing to do with wanting to own your room your house (or the world for that matter) or something.

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  74. WebTV rebates? by randomErr · · Score: 2

    I wonder if WebTV users will get a $200 rebate to upgrade to the new Freon system, with a 3 year subscription to MSN?

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
  75. Mod that up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for saving me making the same post about Freon(tm). Freon(tm) was also a great solvent. Now, let the bidding wars for the Freon(tm) brand name begin!

  76. Re:we all know what a disaster Freon was... try ag by markmoss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The process that happens inside a refrigeration system is based on physics. It does not matter which gas.

    It definitely does matter. Freon isn't just a gas in a refrigerator; it liquefies when it is compressed and gives up heat to the outside air, then evaporates _quickly_ when the pressure is released in the cooling coils. This takes the right variation of the boiling point with pressure. To get just the right physical characteristics in Freon, they tried substituting various numbers of flourine and chlorine atoms for hydrogen atoms in hydrocarbons. And as a bonus, it turns out that Freon is non-poisonous, non-corrosive, and coexists quite well with compressor lubricants.

    Nothing else works quite as well. Water and alcohol have too high boiling points (and might be bad for the pipes and bearings too). CO2 requires a quite high pressure to liquefy. Ammonia is as toxic as cyanide. R134a (similar to Freon but with only carbon, hydrogen, and flourine atoms) is not quite as good at lubricating or at refrigerating.

    By the way, refrigeration was responsible for only a tiny percentage of the chloroflourocarbons released into the environment. Refrigerators that leak coolant are defective! Spray cans were another tiny percentage. Most of the release was industrial cleaning systems - Freon and similar substances being great solvents that dry quickly, and pose no danger to the workers as long as there's enough ventilation to keep oxygen in the room. Generally these systems would try to recycle the Freon, but it kept leaking out around both ends of the conveyor belt.

  77. Is it upgrade-able? by randomErr · · Score: 2

    Someone mentioned earlier about running out of disc space. Will we be able to plug in a USB hard drive to add a few hours of record time?

    It would be cool to offer a way to carry your movies(and games) to friend's house and play them.

    FYI: Xbox uses a modified USB port for all external devices. Thus a USB device could be used as a travel device.

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
  78. Newsflash! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Americans are all cunts

    1. Re:Newsflash! by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      Well, you are about 51% right...

  79. Sounds like DaveDina by Cpyder · · Score: 2

    Game console, PVR, ... sounds like Digital Audio & Video Entertainment and Digital Interactive Networked Amusement to me... or in short DAVEDINA, a project doing all of this under Linux.. Check it out, it's cool, it's almost apt-gettable and it's free (beer/speech)!

  80. Freon disaster?!! by mikethegeek · · Score: 1

    "I must question their naming question however, we all know what a disaster the actual chemical Freon was. Here's to hoping, Cheers!""

    If the submitter had cared to investigate the facts, not the "enviro-nut" rhetoric behind Freon, he'd know that the only "disaster" was that the PATENT on R12 Freon was about to expire. Hence, Freon was to enter the PUBLIC DOMAIN. The company with the R12 patent "happened" to have a newly patented "Freon substitute" that they marketed as "environmentally friendly".

    --
    === The price of freedom is eternal vigilance
    1. Re:Freon disaster?!! by karmawarrior · · Score: 1
      The patents concerning Freon ran out in the late sixties. It wasn't until 5-10 years later that concerns about Freon became widespread, and 20 years later until the shit really hit the fan and countries all over the world banned it.

      DuPont might have wanted to do what you're suggesting. But if it was a giant conspiracy by them, they certainly cocked it up. 20 years for a marketing strategy like that certainly sucks lemons.

      Freon was banned after it was convincingly proven that it did perform the chemical reactions claimed by those concerned by it, and that the ozone layer was massively depleted.

      --
      KMSMA (WWBD?)
  81. At least by HawkingMattress · · Score: 1

    Everyone will soon be able to see those scrambled channels on TV without the need of an exotic pc configuration.

    Thanx bill !

  82. Re:Stable (as in...) by pen · · Score: 1

    Monopoly is not necessarily a bad thing.

  83. X-Box and Freon will run the same games! by Juju · · Score: 2

    The idea is just to add a bigger hard disk and a TV tuner to add some Tivo functionalities to the X-Box.
    I doubt it they will make a $500 console and expect people to make games only for that console. This is never going to work!!!

    --
    Black holes occur when God divides by zero.
  84. Re:Stable (as in...) by pen · · Score: 1

    (As long as it is created by a free market, that is, and not by artificial means such as legislation or mafia connections. Oh wait.. same thing ;)

  85. Is this the "plan of the week" by prisoner · · Score: 2

    club or what? I remember reading an interview with Gates a long time ago where he related in reasonable detail the early days of MS. His viewpoint then was that they were lucky to have survived as they were just thrashing about. The more time goes on, the more I think that this is even more true today. They *do* have a bazillion dollars in the bank nowadays but they seem to have adopted the "trial ballon" approach to everything and are still thrashing. I do give them a lot of credit though, once they latch onto something (like the internet) you can forget about it. It only took a couple of months and they where fighting it out with every other company on the planet to see who could get more "internet" into their products.

  86. The best part... by shepd · · Score: 1

    Is that freon and CFCs are too heavy to reach the ozone in any form unless your favourite airliner has a leaky air conditioner.

    I can probably dredge up some support for the above, if you care to see it (its a little hard, though, as the whole CFC scare happened before the internet's prime time).

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    1. Re:The best part... by haggar · · Score: 2

      You are wrong. Freon and most other CFCs do reach the Ionosphere, where they are broken down into chlorine and fluorites (fluor can's stay in pure state, it's too reactive). It's these that work on destroying the O3 molecules, and causing, as a consequence, an alarming increase in melanomas (skin cancer, to oversimplify it).

      It's a very real threat, ask the people down under.

      --
      Sigged!
    2. Re:The best part... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you're proof would be where? No one has ever shown any evidence that is true. Are you claiming to have done so?z

  87. Compatibility advantage... PS2??? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    Clearly "standard components" are not needed for backwards compatibility if you do things right.

    PS2 - Need I say more?

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  88. Re:we all know what a disaster Freon was... try ag by Randatola · · Score: 1

    It's also interesting to note that, after it was essentially banned in the U.S., Freon was one of the most smuggled substances into the country.

    Because, as you noted, the replacement refrigerants were so inadequate in existing refrigeration systems, there was still a great demand for Freon and there existed (I'm sure there still does, to some extent) a black market for Freon. Freon was the second most smuggled substance into the US from Mexico, because the margins on Freon were nearly as good as those for narcotics.

  89. It'll crash all the time... by Petronius · · Score: 0, Troll

    no need to worry about M$.

    --
    there's no place like ~
  90. Not totally... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    Needless to say, once you've paid the price of a retrofit, it's not much more to fix the condenser capacity issue.

    Solution 1: Get a new condenser from a newer car. Best if done at the same time as the retrofit. They run $150-200.

    Solution 2: The cheap one, and one I plan on implementing soon. (My A/C is borderline - It cools, but it sometimes takes a while, as opposed to my heat which comes up within a minute or two) Solution 2 is to install an auxiliary fan in front of the condenser that is hooked to the A/C clutch circuit. This will provide additional cooling capacity. Some cars need it more than others - I know of a guy with a Toyota minivan - It wouldn't cool down at all until it was moving 50+ until the owner installed a fan. My Dodge Spirit is borderline, but cools whether standing or moving - Because the main radiator fan is already set to turn on full-time whenever the A/C is turned on. (As opposed to only under certain speed/temp conditions)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  91. quality of this discussion by rnd() · · Score: 2

    There have been times in the past when I have wondered if anyone at Microsoft (Gates perhaps) reads Slashdot. I can honestly say that this discussion is not of a high enough quality that anyone at Microsoft would gain anything from it. This might just be a trend at /. as of late, but the quality of discussion and level of critical thought sinks through the floor whenever a story about Microsoft is posted. Oddly, there are typically one or two Microsoft stories posted to /. every day. Why can't the /. community get the chip off its collective shoulder and remember the fascination that got us interested in computers/technology in the first place. What a bunch of cynical bozos.

    --

    Amazing magic tricks

    1. Re:quality of this discussion by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      That's a great point. I barely ever read anything posted on this site that has anything to do with Microsoft products or news. The /. articles themselves are 95% biased opinion 5% useful information (usually only consisting of the URL to the site where you can get the real news). And the responses from readers are unbelievably obtuse. It's good to know I'm not the ONLY person here with that view too. :) I've read /. for years now and have noticed its rapid decline of reader comments and article bias. This sucks really, since /. could be the ultimate source for tech news and discussion, and no matter hat anyone says it ISN'T right now because of these ridiculous trends in its readership. Just my 2c.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    2. Re:quality of this discussion by gerardrj · · Score: 2

      ...remember the fascination that got us interested in computers/technology in the first place.

      You insinuate that Microsoft was that 'fascination'. I must state that in my case that is most certainly not the way it happened. Granted, I'm an oddball, but I first got hooked on mainframes. My dad worked on IBM mainframes and would take me to work from time to time.

      From there, I went to Tandy's CoCo, TI's 99/4a and the Commodore 64. After that: Unix worstations and Macs. I've owned an IBM PC or clone from time to time, just to tinker with, but I can't recall that Windows or any Wintel system caused any facination or modivation in me. Microsoft has in fact almost continually obfisticated or restricted everything that facinates me most about computers and in particular programming.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    3. Re:quality of this discussion by rnd() · · Score: 2
      You insinuate that Microsoft was that 'fascination'.

      I didn't mean to make that insinuation at all. My first computer was a TI 99/4a, followed a few years later by an Apple //c. It was still a few years after that before I got my first PC clone (actually, it was an original IBM XT).

      I don't understand why so many /. readers spend so much energy hating Microsoft. If they spent the equivalent energy writing great OSS code, Microsoft wouldn't stay in business long.

      My point is that technology can be cool no matter who wrote it or who sells it (or gives it away). I think it will be exciting to have one more device in the TiVO space, and it will be interesting to see if Microsoft's device lets you skip commercials.

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

    4. Re:quality of this discussion by gerardrj · · Score: 2
      I agree with that. The problem is that so many people in the world prefer to direct their energy toward the path of least resistance.

      In this case, the path of least resistance is complaining/whining ahout what they consider to be the evil empire. The constructive route of providing alternatives to that empire are considered too difficult and so they just whine.

      It's a shame really, because you can learn enough C or C++ in a week or two to get started in programming; at least in modifying existing code or expanding it. While coding does require skill and thought, one could always just write documentation.

      But then again, if the population would actually apply itself, instead of always being a 'victim', we wouldn't need the government. People like the government: it does things for them. Then the people can just watch TV and complain (about the government).

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    5. Re:quality of this discussion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      contribute, or shut the fuck up

    6. Re:quality of this discussion by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      What I hate is the whole 'If I bag on MS, maybe all these people will respect me' drivel. It's getting really really old.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  92. Change of focus again ? by fizzychicken · · Score: 1
    I remember attending my first XBox Developers Conference a couple of years ago (I'm an XBox programmer), and hearing from the big cheese at the time that one of the driving forces behind the XBox was the desire to not make it a jack of all trades. 'This isn't going to be a toaster-teapot' or some-such.

    I can't help thinking that MS are changing tack with this after the none-too-promising sales of XBox of late. I think they have realised that even though XBox has better hardware than both PS2 and GC, people don't think the XBox is sexy enough to lay over their dough. Sony and Nintendo make sexy, fashionable hardware that people love to own. Most peoples only interaction with Microsoft is when they are forced to fight with Windows whenever they use a PC. Microsoft just ain't sexy, that's the problem they are facing.

    But who knows, maybe they will have better luck fighting against TiVO and ReplayTV (if they haven't been sued out of business yet). Maybe they can smuggle XBox in under the wire, in the world of set top boxes where functionality could be perceived as more important than 'fashion accessory'.

    Let's just hope they don't make the next one a big plastic brick with badly designed joypads. It's a shame the XBox isn't doing too well (especially in Europe and Japan), it's a great bit of kit; it's just got a chronic image problem. I always thought it was a bad idea to plaster 'Microsoft' all over it.

    --
    'Those who will not reason, are bigots, those who cannot are fools, and those who dare not, are slaves.' - George Gordon
    1. Re:Change of focus again ? by Phil+Wilkins · · Score: 2

      I put this change of focus down to a renewed power grab from the WebTV / UltimateTV group.

      "But Gates left a glimmer of hope for the WebTV team. [...] This fateful suggestion turned into a new form of the old Microsoft strategy tax, slowing down the Xbox again." here

  93. Open Source replacement for Freon by Skreech · · Score: 1
  94. Freon, huh? by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

    This explains a lot. Now we know what runs in their veins.

    --

    --

    As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  95. UKOD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this make BillG the Undisputed King of the Ozone Destroyers?

  96. Wont work, here's why. by Viewsonic · · Score: 1

    Because most of the compliances will need to be upgraded. The XBox2 is already announced, and most likely an XBox3 soon after. The console portion of this Freon box will need to be continually updated. Likewise for the DVD capabilities. The XBox already has major issues with quite a few movies (Lists are out there, do a search.), and so far I have yet to see anyone use the XBox, or even PS2 for that matter as their primary DVD player (Kudos to Nintendo for skipping this hype.). Also, same thing with PVRs, they will need to be upgraded, larger drives, newer software, and this is a monthly fee. So what happens if just one of the 3 components breaks? (I've had a bad PS1 and a bad Tivo in my lifetime, friends have had DVD Players die on them also.) Thats 3 times the failure rate of a normal device you can just rebuy two years down the road. With the new Freon you'll be out most likely $500 instead of $100 or $200 if they were seperate.. Looking at Microsofts track record for defects with the XBox, I think even if the Freon DID look cool, specwise, with all the best software for PVR'n, no one would buy it simply because they didn't want a hunk of plastic that didn't work after 2 years. Many companies have tried making an all-in-one set top box, and they literally went under soon after. This is most likely the beginning of the end for Microsoft in the home entertainment dept.

    1. Re:Wont work, here's why. by Mulletproof · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "...Freon box will need to be continually updated."

      I wouldn't think this is a huge obstacle. Really. If the thing has a hard drive then updating is a issue unless it were something major. Um, I use my XBox (cue flaming) as my primary (read: only) DVD player and i have to ask why is it hype? Kind of a logical step if you ask me. Your console plays DVD games, why not movies in the same format. Damn useful if you ask me. Which you didn't. But if you did...

      "So what happens if just one of the 3 components breaks?"

      First, what 3 components are you talking about? The DVD, HD and..? Motherboard? But even without knowing what those components are, the answer is simple- Fix/buy a new one or do without. The more capabilities a unit has, the easier it is to stop up the plumbing, naturally. It goes with the territory of any technology and it's something you have to live with. Other technologies have this inherent problem yet they thrive. Go figure.

      "Microsofts track record for defects with the XBox"

      Huh. Source please. Link it. The only ones I know of was a small batch of the consoles were scratching disks in Japan and I had my friend mention one overheating as a display model, but that's all I've heard, and since I own one, I like to think I listen for that sort of news. And as much as I love the PS1 I have to mention that it had it's share of issues depite it's popularity, namely the laser assembly burning out or jamming prematurally (discounting hot-swapping of import CDs). I know /. is an MS haters club, but come on...

      "because they didn't want a hunk of plastic that didn't work after 2 years"

      If it's anything close to an Xbox, the damn thing is as close to a computer as it'll get. And unlike a computer, it doesn't nessisarily need to be at the cutting edge of technology. I don't see us moving away from DVDs anytime soon. Will TV be changing that rapidly to make this obsolete in 2 years? What, exactly, will make this hardware obsolete? I agree that ll technology has a finite shelf life, but PVR? As long as you can update the software, technology like this will have a long lifespan.

      Maybe it won't work, but your "why" needs a few less holes.

      --
      You need a FREE iPod Nano
    2. Re:Wont work, here's why. by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Thanks for being so insiteful. It's rare to have people that think so objectively about MS around here...and it's welcome, in my opinion.

      I often feel as though I'm surrounded by a bunch of picketing, rallying, tree-hugger types.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  97. Re: Xbox failure outside US by Mongoose · · Score: 2


    Besides having ~5 games that would sell in the market of Japan:

    1. They released machines that damaged several users game and dvd discs in Japan at launch

    3. They took about a month or two to admit it was broken

    4. They replace xboxes

    5. They will never replace damaged media

    I don't care if you're selling bread or negative io n hairdryers -- you must have consumer support on level with your service. Even the WonderSwan is kicking Xbox in the balls in sells. It's like Y2800 or something! ( ~Y122 : 1 USD )

    Japan the same nation that won't put Snow Brand Milk/Foods out of bussiness for countless near yearly food posionings of school children won't even take that. (Humor) =)

  98. Freon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they referring to the memory leaks, or the fact that it's already obsolete?

  99. Um, what about patents? by ryanvm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm not quite sure how MS plan's on evading the patent issue. Unfortunately for Microsoft, the PVR industry is laden with patents like a minefield. Both TiVo and ReplayTV hold a number of them on PVR technology. Unless these companies plan on surviving on license fees like a tick on Microsoft's neck, it seems to me like Microsoft is going to have quite a wait (about 15 years) before it can get into the PVR biz.

    1. Re:Um, what about patents? by marick · · Score: 2

      Yeah, well, they did buy WebTV long ago (rumor has it they bought it so they could kill WebTV's Java plans), and they released their own UltimateTV a couple of years ago. Both of these were PVRs...

    2. Re:Um, what about patents? by mcjulio · · Score: 1

      Where have you been? Microsoft shipped and killed UltimateTV awhile ago, which is where the PVR tech for Freon is coming from. Patents aren't even an issue here.

    3. Re:Um, what about patents? by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      Uh, did you even read my links? Specifically this one. UltimateTV has been shuffled off into the darkness since TiVo received its patents. So - where have you been?

    4. Re:Um, what about patents? by tillemetry · · Score: 1

      ...And here I thought the reference was to the patent on the word "Freon".

      (Dow Chemical and all...)

      I'd laugh my ass off if Dow sued...

  100. Re:Possible MS Project Names - bad chemicals by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Introducing Microsoft Agent Orange!

    This remote agent is downloaded into your computer overnight by Microsoft. It works behind the scenes in your computer to help keep it secure. (against you, the enemy) While you're using your computer, Agent Orange is hard at work maintaining the integrity and security of your system.

    Microsoft Agent Orange can also notify you of special offers that you might be interested in. Such as how to increase the length of your... oh wait.

    --

    Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
  101. Re:Stable (as in...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as I get to be the little car, sure, I agree with you.

  102. evil dupont by gripdamage · · Score: 2

    Not that I want you all to think I'm a big pothead or something; I always hear potheads saying crap like this, but... I heard it was also DuPont who led the charge to get marijuana listed as a controlled substance, supposedly because their artificial carpet fibers were hopelessly inferior to hemp. Anyone know if this is fact?

    1. Re:evil dupont by NeuroChrist · · Score: 0

      according to Jello Biafra on, I belive, "Smoke more Pot" from I Blow Minds for a Living, it was due to a new paper processing system that used more of DuPonts chemicals than hemp would. Like twice as much. of course I have not researched this on my own, but I trust Jello. There is always room for more Jello.

  103. Has anyone considered that this is vaporware by frode · · Score: 1

    I saw an article not long ago that Sony was able to cut the cost of PS2 much earlier than anyone including Microsoft expected. This lead to Microsoft cutting the price of the Xbox and losing even more money per unit that before while Sony was still making a per unit profit or at least breaking even while gaining more and more market share.

    Now consider Microsoft, a place where non-authorized leaks rarely make it into the press
    and even when they do die soon for lack of any comment. Also look at who is re-running the WSJ article, MSNBC.com.

    Now If I were Microsoft I might float a story of how great our next product will be and that it is right around the corner. Hopefully all the kiddies and they're SUV driving parents will keep their cash in their pockets and not by any system waiting for MS revolutionary system.

    Microsoft's best stratagey is to keep as many consumers out of the market until it has a console that it makes some money on or at least loses less and is more competitive with Sony's console.

    -FRODE

    --
    I have no .Sig
  104. Re:we all know what a disaster Freon was... try ag by afidel · · Score: 3, Informative

    Also, freon and its sister chemicals only accounted for a very small percentage of the free chlorine radicals in the upper atmosphere. In fact one volcanic eruption in south america in the early 90's spewed about 10 times as much chlorine into the upper atmosphere as all the industrial chemicals user in human history! Now because of its stable configuration freon has a disproportionate effect, but it is still estimated by some scientists that volcanic activity has had 2 orders of magnitude more impact on the ozone layer than human activity during the period since industrial revolution.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  105. Re:we all know what a disaster Freon was... try ag by markmoss · · Score: 2

    It's also interesting to note that, after it was essentially banned in the U.S., Freon was one of the most smuggled substances into the country.

    I don't know about that, but back in 1995 we paid $5,000 for one barrel of freon to run a solvent cleaner for electronic circuit boards until the FDA finally approved the water-wash process. What's funny is that this plant had never had a solvent cleaner in the 11 years it was running before we picked up that damned medical equipment contract...

  106. Word Replaced by SEWilco · · Score: 1
    Of course Word will be replaced by something much cooler by then. It will look really pretty, but none of your old Word documents will be valid under it. Thus you are protected from all the things which you thought were true but turned out to not be.

    Word.

  107. Excellent... by DooBall · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is one step closer! (click sig link)

  108. Let me get this straight... by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

    Microsoft is slowly but surely losing the current console war. They're still behind their major competitor (Sony) and, while they may be ahead of or behind Nintendo, they don't have Nintendo's ability to make money no matter what place they're in (observe N64). And now they want to make sure to pour cement into Xbox's grave by bringing out a new console already? This is up there with Sega's 32X/Saturn fiasco.

    Somebody needs to inform Microsoft that this is not the PC industry. They may or may not be able to psych out Sony a bit, but Yamauchi is too much of a miserable old curmudgeon to do anything but laugh at Microsoft for this one.

    Oh, and let's not forget that the "set top box" concept has yet to pan out (or even be fully realized) for it to be a profitable idea for Sony or Microsoft (ie. people aren't turning away from the GameCube simply because it doesn't play DVDs).

    About the only effect I've heard of that this concept has had in the industry is that launch titles got burned as people bought the PlayStation 2 but no games (people got it as a new DVD player). From that experience alone Microsoft may drive away possible game writers as they try to put more and more functionality in to Xbox2.

  109. I think its appropriate. by Gannoc · · Score: 3, Funny


    Once you have Freon, it costs a lot of money to dispose of it.

    1. Re:I think its appropriate. by Chorizo911 · · Score: 0

      Doesn't cost anything to flush it down the toilet... Really that hole in the bathroom is good for more then just piss and poop! Motor oil, antifreeze, gasoline, acetone, old paint if its liquid it will flush...

  110. I swear by Seekerofknowledge · · Score: 1

    This is definitely a sign of why games seem to be losing their appeal lately.

    Though Microsoft hoped the introduction of a hard disk and other features would inspire developers to write more exciting games than for the PlayStation 2

    Why do games have to be exciting? Excitation is not the only valuable quality of a video game! A game needs to be unique and wonderful and truly inspiring! Nobody needs excitement 24/7, nor does every video game have to be about excitement. Continuing to produce games with this mentality will only result in the withering of the game industry into mind-numbing all-fire and bullets and explosions-all-the-time games that nobody wants to play. A constant flow of over-the-top games will only reduce gamers' desire for such, as even the World's Greatest Rollercoaster can get boring after a while.

    The single greatest reason the Xbox and it's successors will fail.

    geez.
    (whew - thanks for the rant. :) )

  111. So, Bill Gates spent a week... by freeBill · · Score: 2

    ...playing videogames on non-MS consoles. I wish I could justify that as a "think week." He should have spent it contemplating the following sequence of events:



    1. Enron
    2. sombody else
    3. WorldCom
    4. Xerox


    --
    Eternal vigilance only works if you look in every direction.
  112. Don't Play by House Rules by reallocate · · Score: 1
    Rather than bemoan the Microsoft monolith, why not play to the strength of open source, i.e., don't play by the house rules established by the open source priesthood. Draw in real consumers (stop calling them "lusers");give up the notion that open source has to be bounded and shaped by Linux, the BSD's, etc., and expand the notion to all kinds of platforms; get a clue about non-geek users and build some imaginative tools for them to use; don't be afraid to start selling shrink-wrapped products, get sales people on the street pushing the stuff.

    Truth is, the open source/free software/pick your-label-movement is rooted in a Unix developers ethos. It champions worthy and useful high-minded notions that are relevant only to someone who shares that mind set. Consumers are people who buy things. Give them something they wqnt to buy.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  113. Re:we all know what a disaster Freon was... try ag by matastas · · Score: 1, Interesting

    That anecdote was most likely bullshit. Inhaling Freon is a tremendously bad idea: Freon is heavier than air, and will displace all of the oxygen in your lungs. You'll suffocate pretty fast. Unless the du Pont guy basically hot-boxed the Freon, and was extremely careful, the incident was probably fabricated.

    There was an Emergency 911 where some dumbass HVAC tech filled his air mattress with Freon. His kid caught a lungfull, nearly died.

    And at any rate, it makes a stupid codename. The marketing drones fell asleep at the wheel.

  114. well..... by khold · · Score: 1

    At least it isn't called Prion, which would be the cause of mad cow disease, instead of Freon! Just think of the connotations..... The main software for it could be full of holes, just like a mad cow's brain.

    --
    rm -rf sig
  115. Treason!!! by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    What? And shed that elitist image by catering to a large segment of the sales population? You must be joking?! Make Linux popular with the masses!?!? And actually compete with MS?! You, my man, are insane.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:Treason!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you, my man, are funny as hell!

  116. uh... _code_ names? by H0NGK0NGPH00EY · · Score: 1

    right... so anyway, since when do internal codenames have to be original, having anything to do with the product, or even clever? Give it a rest, people...

    --
    Do not read this sig.
  117. Alternative refrigerant gases by Nick+Driver · · Score: 1

    There exists another, simple cheap and efficient alternative refrigerant: a blend of propane and isobutane. Yep, common hydrocarbons. They refrigerate well in the same pressure ranges as R12, blend well with lubricating oils, and biodegrade easily since they are simple hydrocarbons. The reason why they are not used is that they are flammable, but the laws prohibiting their use as refrigerants are not well-based on reason... they are based on emotion. Two or three pounds of butane/propane pressurized in a car's air conditioning system is not that great of a fire or explosion hazard. Compared to the gasoline on board a car, the relatively small amount of refrigerant would be negligeable. One gallon of gasoline weighs about 6 pounds and the typical car has a minimum of a 10 gallon tank. Even in a collision, the refrigerant would spray out into the atmosphere and dissipate in a few seconds, especially if the system was fitted with a quick release emergency dump valve. When a gasoline tank ruptures, you then have a big pool of gasoline that sits around, surrounding the wreckage. Gasoline is a much greater threat. We've all seen plenty of Hollywood movies... the huge orange fireballs that go in all the special effects explosions, those are done with gasoline. Propane/butane explosions are much more benign and take huge quantities in giant tanks to get anywhere near as spectacular as gasoline.

    1. Re:Alternative refrigerant gases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my job, I've seen a lot of auto accidents. I've seen many, many cars that leaked gas, but never seen a single fire. The secret is that gas is very difficult to light. If the vapor in the air has too low or too high of a concentration (between 3% and 5%, if I remember correctly), then it simply won't burn. Think about how many dozens of accidents you've seen, and how many of them resulted in a fire? I've only seen the orange fireballs on TV. The freon-replacement you're talking about is much easier to light. Think about butane, which you probably have experience with. It is used in lighters, because it is relatively easy to light in many different conditions.z

  118. Hang on a moment.... by slayer99 · · Score: 1

    Hasn't someone already used the prouct name Freon before?

    --
    Martin Brooks / Slayer99 #linux / UIN 2178117
  119. walk before running. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't they fix windows first.

  120. Dumb Terminals in the Living Room by Vegan+Pagan · · Score: 2

    The only way I can see that content creator-approved "multimedia convergence" and content on demand in the living room will happen is through dumb terminals on broadband.

    The MPAA and RIAA, and eventually ISDA, will only feel safe when their content/software resides nowhere in the world but on a few dozen hard drives in their offices. Only dumb terminals can let them to do that and still provide all the conveniences and flexibility comparable to the WWW. And since they'll demand maximum DRM, they'll thus demand minimum client-side caching, which means each client will need lots of bandwith and very low latency.

    As long as Microsoft is talking about giving consumers hard drives, they won't have the content provider's cooperation.

  121. BRAVO! Well said!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agreed. The socialist tree-hugger BS commentary that is tagged onto (most) Slashdot articles is getting old, fast.

  122. Microsoft and the media conglomerates by Infonaut · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This is interesting. The closer they get to some form of gaming/TV convergence, the more Microsoft will have to deal with the potential conflicts of interest between their hardware and software efforts.

    Microsoft has always come down heavily in favor of aggressively protecting copyrighted material. They support the media giants in their efforts to make copy-proof one-time use media. They are talking about integrating code checking (intellectual property validation by another name) into future OS releases.

    They've always taken this stance because first and foremost, they're a software company. But now they're moving into hardware. Companies like Dell and Apple, which have been up in arms about the media conglomerates' strong-arm tactics, have a vested interest in standing up for fair-use rights as computers become more tightly integrated with media creation and playback.

    So far Microsoft has skirted the issue with ReplayTV, but if they try to take TV integration to the next level, they'll run smack-dab into the media giants.

    Of course, based on their history, MS is likely to make deals with the media giants that restrict fair use by creating micropayment schemes or some other method of tracking and billing users for the wonderful things they're doing with the TV/game box.

    This would alienate users in droves, especially when there are plenty of other competitors out there who aren't primarily software companies. Of course, MS could just wait for the hardware companies to do all the hard work of fighting the intellectual property battles with the media industry. Then they could step in after the dust clears, and reap the benefits without exposing themselves.

    Whatever happens, Microsoft is literally getting so big and diversified that some of its products are bound to compete with each other in significant ways. I wonder, can Bill, as clever as he is, continue to advance Microsoft on all fronts without at some point having to scale back his ambitions?

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Microsoft and the media conglomerates by mcjulio · · Score: 1

      This isn't a conflict, it's a business opportunity. By playing both sides of the court, Microsoft provides features that customers will like and simultaneously forces media providers to get on board for its content control schemes if they don't want to see their revenues fade. So Media Player plays MP3s without complaint and also supports the locked up Windows Media Format, which is slowly gaining traction as an alternate file format on new CDs, in addition to the PCM data.

  123. Re: The Environment by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
    If freon contains CFCs and eats up the ozone layer, what will MS Freon do?

    Freeze competition out of your living room, you had to ask?

    BTW, when MS blows it again, you can't dump your electronic trash in China, so might as well pack it up and send it to Redmond, let the Beast's home state deal with it.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  124. Microsoft already makes a PVR by Animats · · Score: 2

    It's called Ultimate TV, and it's only offered for one of the direct-broadcast satellite services. They haven't tried to market it more broadly. Unclear why.

    1. Re:Microsoft already makes a PVR by Phil+Wilkins · · Score: 2

      ...because no-one really wants to get into bed with Microsoft? They do have a terrible habit of eating their partners alive.

      Oh yes, and because they were incredibly late with a recent set-top box contract. There was quite a bit of coverage on this on the Register IIRC.

  125. Freon changed civilization for the better by benzapp · · Score: 1

    Despite the alleged ozone depleting effects of Freon, this chemical revolutionized much of the world. To call it anything less than revolutionary is not being wholly factual.

    From Churchill's newly airconditioned bunker during WWII, to the entire southeastern US, virtually unihabitable before airconditioning, many parts of the world previously inhospitable to human life were made welcoming.

    Think of the whole new culture of beach bums, and the gigantic migration to warmer climates... None of this would have been possible without freon. Had any of us lived 60 years ago, the mere thought of going to Florida would seem like torture.

    --
    I don't read or respond to AC posts
  126. This reminds me of... by Viceice · · Score: 1

    That Batman movie where the Joker has this console in everyones home and it grabs everybodys bank numbers right out of their heads...

    come to think about it, that Microsoft's m/o isn't it?

    *Shudder*

    --
    Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
  127. Console makers always overpromise. by Vegan+Pagan · · Score: 2

    MS is just following the console tradition of talking about three consoles for every one they actually bring to market.

    When Nintendo made the NES, they talked about making it a "Trojan Horse" that would bring content on demand and online shopping, including stock trading, to the living room. They also talked about several SNES CD-ROM drives and a N64 disk drive. And they talked about Game Boy Advance six years before they brought it to market.

    Sony talked about PlayStation 2, 3 and 4 back in 1995.

    Atari talked about their 16-bit console "Panther" in 1991, and Matsushita talked about the 3DO "M2" in 1996. They marketed neither.

    Sega did actually bring out every console they promised, but only the Genesis / Mega Drive was profitable. They tried to support 11 others that lost money, including unheard-of combinations like Genesis + Sega CD + 32X.

  128. Re:It's like Microsoft's Java Strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -1, Troll?

    Ha, I see some Microsoft people have moderating privileges. Either that, or somebody has forgotten his Microsoft history.

    It wasn't a troll. It was an honest comment based on the evidence that came out during the Java trial, in which a Microsoft marketing presentation said:

    > the "strategic objective" was to "kill cross-platform Java by grow[ing] the polluted Java market."

    http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-06-1998/jw -0 6-iw-doj.html

  129. Engineering Code of Ethics by Coward+Anonymous · · Score: 2

    Maybe it is about time Microsoft engineers read the Software Engineering Code of Ethics. Specifically, their duty to the public at large.

  130. A PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft will evolve X-Box to the point where it becomes...

    A Personal Computer.

  131. Re:Stable (as in...) by MyHair · · Score: 1

    Monopoly is not necessarily a bad thing.

    As long as we don't play with "fines to the middle, free parking gets the cash" rules. That was too cool when I was 8, but it sucks now that I'm 32. But $400 for landing on Go is okay.

    And if AC gets the car, then I want the dog.

    (Oops, i just got trolled and posted a bad, stupid, redundant joke. Oh well, this is my second day being a registered Slashdot user.)

  132. I like this line: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Xbox console isn't profitable for the Redmond, Wash., company and its costs are believed to be higher than Sony's, partly because of the hard drive and a version of its powerful Windows operating system included with each machine."

    Since when is Windows a powerful operating system? More companies should use linux in their devices if they want power.

  133. 5 years by yerricde · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Console lifecycles are something like 3 years

    Closer to five.

    Not so keen on the Gamecube myself, it's a bit too kiddy for my tastes

    Resident Evil Special Edition kiddy? Hardly.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:5 years by kpetruse · · Score: 1

      Luigi's Mansion? Pikmin? Super Monkey Ball? Sonic Adventure 2?

      Now I'm sure they are all great games, but I got a bit tired of platform games years back. A couple of more mature titles don't swing it for me. Got a beef with that?

  134. maybe freon != R-12 by djtack · · Score: 1

    "freon" is the old english word for "friend", and is also the root of the modern english "freedom".

  135. Anyone notice the Xbox ads by ManInBlackinNJ · · Score: 1

    Where they show the Xbox buyer/user(Skateboarder not paying attention to landing the 50/50 Grind.) taking it up the a$$. Is this a case of foreshadowing?

  136. Apt name by atcurtis · · Score: 1


    It might be cool but its got security flaws as big as the ozone hole.

    --
    -- The universe began. Life started on a billion worlds...
    -- Except on one where stupidity was there first.
  137. MS tour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could this have anything to do with a recent tour to MS and getting tagged when I said I was with slashdot. For some unknown reason when I access linux software now, I get a zapped. Considence or myth.

  138. 1984 Redux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Combine this story with Palladium.

    Picture an "enhanced" X-box (or that "Tablet Computer" Bill keeps harping about). Add a hardware/software remote-management "feature" with Redmond at the controls. Toss in one of those little "spycams" from the ubiquitous pop-up ads with an ultra-wide-angle lens, and a wall bracket. Oh, and leave out any means of turning the thing off.

    There you have it--the Telescreen. Looks like Orwell's prediction was dead-nuts on, except for the time being off by just about 20 years.

  139. Perspective Correction by Phil+Wilkins · · Score: 2

    > my PS2 is practically the same size

    No Dougal, the PS2 is small, the x-box is far away.

  140. Re:xnigger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I get the icon in powder blue?

  141. Offtopic - Bad Product Names. Re:funny names by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 2

    Offtopic for this story, but ontopic for this thread:

    Strange though it seems, surely this can be the only explanation for an OS called 'winCE'...

    I thought that one was bad, but not nearly as bad as the Audi sport sedan, the TT. Just look at it drive by, AudiTT on the bumper as it zooms past.

    But think about it for a moment: why would you market an expensive car, aimed at high-class clientelle such as lawyers and accountants, and call it the auditt? It's not the Audi T T, it's the Audit!

    DUH!

    --
    SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
    1. Re:Offtopic - Bad Product Names. Re:funny names by duct_tape_n_wd40 · · Score: 1

      Equally offtopic...

      Toyota Tacoma . What were they thinking? Like I'm going to drive that thing in a high wind...

      --
      .siggy .siggy .siggy .siggy hoi hoi hoi - Prosit!
    2. Re:Offtopic - Bad Product Names. Re:funny names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insert obligatory mention of the Chevy Nova failing in Spanish-speaking countries here.

  142. Re:we all know what a disaster Freon was... try ag by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    > In fact, water, alchohol, and even good old CO2

    Actually, my dad, in his toolmaking days, told me tales about how they'd build a refrigerator that ran off compressed air. No need to get fancy with water, alcohol, or even good old CO2.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  143. Re:we all know what a disaster Freon was... try ag by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Well, what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Wasn't DuPont the company that supposedly invented a process to produce paper more cheaply from hemp than from trees, such that Hearst (who had just invested megabucks in forests to supply trees for his papers) created anti-marijuana rantings (can't call it familiar and friendly hemp anymore) in cahoots with a power hungry congresscritter who needed an issue to trumpet?

    Or maybe it was Dow.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  144. Re:we all know what a disaster Freon was... try ag by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    But that's not a sexy story that leads to power for certain politicians. Facts denied!

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  145. Fahrenheit 451 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm... Freon huh? Is that a DoubleSpeak reference to "the family".

  146. I could care less... by jjackson · · Score: 1

    &lt rant &gt

    If there is one piece of equipment that will never take up space in my house, it is a game console. I have 3 children that I spend enough time struggling with to get them to do their home work or find something a bit more creative to do than veg in front of a television.

    I have 5 computers running at home... 1 for myself, 1 for my wife, 1 for my children, 1 that acts as a file/game server and one that runs Linux as a firewall. There are plenty of games available for the PC to provide the occassional gaming entertainment experience... the hell if I am going to spend another $400 plus the cost of games just to have a PC than can do nothing BUT play games. The whole concept seems stupid to me...

    Buy a PC and a decent graphics accelerator. That way you can play games and when you aren't, the money you spent can actually be used for something productive.

    While some may argue that Freon (probably more like expensive-on) adds additional functionality to the game console, it is not functionality that I want from a single piece of equipment... if I am playing a game and there is something on TV that I want to watch, I personally like the ability to record it at the same time without it causing a reduction in framerate or a sudden system crash.

    I wish these idiots would simply focus on making a more stable and secure OS... some of of just simply like our Sony (or Panasonic, etc) entertainment equipment and could give 2 shits about M$'s visions... they belong in my office, not my livingroom!

    &lt /rant &gt

  147. Wow. by Mathness · · Score: 1

    Microsoft was expected to have shipped only 3.5 million to four million Xboxes by Sunday

    I am impressed, several million X boxes shipped in a few days.
    That is one amazing package and shipping department.

    Oh wait... You mean from launch date till now?
    My mistake.
    Move along, there is nothing to see here.

    --
    Carbon based humanoid in training.
  148. Re:we all know what a disaster Freon was... try ag by suicidal · · Score: 1

    The process that happens inside a refrigeration system is based on physics. It does not matter which gas. In fact, water, alchohol, and even good old CO2 all can be used as refrigerents and do just a good a job cooling food as Freon did.

    Yes, it is based on physics, and had you stayed awake in said class, you might have clued in to the fact that different substances have different properties, and are NOT all equal. If they were, we'd be using inert gasses. *Simplified*: R-12 is compressed into its liquid state so that it will boil when passed through the evaporator, dropping in temperature to it's boiling point of (negative whatever degrees). It is then compressed back into liquid form (smaller tube), and it does it again.

    Water (or any other fluid that I'm aware of) does not compress. That is the principal/law that hydraulic systems are based on. Fluids don't compress, gasses do. Ever seen a fuelie go up in an explosion and wonder what happened? Too much fuel in the cylinder (vs air), the compression was too much for the heads, and boom!

    That said, I should note that many new refrigerents can be quite flammable under certain conditions. Plus lets not forget what CFC based refrigents do to the ozone layer. A problem much worse for everyone then the ammonia.

    I'm still trying to figure out why this is so widely accepted. If anyone has a good answer, I'd be interested (seriously). How does a gas as heavy as chlorine rise above lighter gasses to the ozone layer? Chlorine is, after all, the catalyst in R-12 which is supposedly destroying the ozone layer, while at the same time we're complaining of high ozone content in the lower atmosphere due to vehicle emissions. Is the heavy gas Chlorine gas really making a miraculous trip into the upper atmosphere to destroy O3 while leaving the Ozone down here intact for us to breath? Or did DuPont buy another government backed scare to make more dough?

    Kind of fitting the M$ would use a name already fraught with treachery and lies.

  149. BMW versus Toyota?! by dstone · · Score: 2

    While "the Xbox is a full-feature BMW, the PS2 is a Toyota," says Bruno Bonnell, chairman and chief executive of French game maker Infogrames Entertainment SA.

    Bruno's point can be taken either way. Okay, so he's French and there's probably some Euro-snobbery going on here. But consider that a fast, cheap, and arguably more reliable Toyota MR2 Spyder or Celica GT can give any "full-feature" BMW (read: bloated/luxurious) a good run in the real world. This is gaming. We're talking entertainment here. Bang for the buck. Not prestige or old reputation!

  150. What Micro$oft wants by Kotukunui · · Score: 1

    Bruce Simpson of Aardvark thinks that Freon&copy is an attempt to put MS in the position of being the worldwide arbiter of digital media rights.

    Read about his thoughts

  151. Playing both sides by Infonaut · · Score: 2
    That's a scary thought indeed. I hadn't really thought about it that way, but do you think they'll be able to pull that off with television? They don't seem to have as much leverage in the MPEG, and broadcasters have a built-in aversion to any one company calling the shots on the technical end.

    It seems to me that as they enter the TV market, they're dealing with a different kind of animal than they're used to. Of course, they've been working hand in glove with NBC for some time now, so they've doubtless learned a lot from the experience.

    That's the thing about Microsoft. You can never count them out, because they can afford to hemmorage money and make colossal mistakes, because their pockets are so deep.

    It will be interesting (in the "may you live in interesting times" sort of way), regardless of how it turns out.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  152. Re: here's the _correct_ 3 step version by fferreres · · Score: 2

    Step 1: Find a big niche, saturate the market at dumping prices, lose lots of money but make sure competitors lose more money than they can afford to lose.
    Step 2: ??????
    Step 3: Profit

    Well, we all know it works, and what the ???????? stands for.

    --
    unfinished: (adj.)
  153. Just like the chemical... by Poppageorgio · · Score: 0

    Just like the chemical Freon, its a bad thing, but they'll wait till 3/4 of america has the product in use before they explain how evil it is. By then, you won't have a choice about using it, unless you want an expensive upgrade.

    --
    Me fail English? That's unpossible!
  154. website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This Website sucks!!!.

  155. Re:we all know what a disaster Freon was... try ag by CTachyon · · Score: 1

    Note: Fscking Slashdot doesn't support <pre>, <sub>, or <sup> anymore, so the following may get ugly. Disclaimer: My family business is in the HVAC industry, albeit not at the design and manufacture end of things.

    I'm still trying to figure out why this is so widely accepted. If anyone has a good answer, I'd be interested (seriously). How does a gas as heavy as chlorine rise above lighter gasses to the ozone layer? Chlorine is, after all, the catalyst in R-12 which is supposedly destroying the ozone layer, while at the same time we're complaining of high ozone content in the lower atmosphere due to vehicle emissions. Is the heavy gas Chlorine gas really making a miraculous trip into the upper atmosphere to destroy O3 while leaving the Ozone down here intact for us to breath? Or did DuPont buy another government backed scare to make more dough?

    My understanding is that O3 has a half-life of something on the order of 15 minutes under normal tropospheric conditions, and is unstable enough even in the stratosphere that the ozone layer wouldn't exist if the Sun's UV light weren't constantly breaking it down and reforming it. That means that it's not very surprising that it doesn't migrate very far from where it forms. However, the atmosphere is highly turbulent, so the mere fact that a gas is heavy doesn't mean it won't find its way to the stratosphere (given enough time).

    What makes commercial CFCs different from volcanic emissions is that CFCs are extremely stable -- just about the only things that break them down are fire and hard UV -- whereas most natural chlorine-containing gases are highly reactive. That reactivity serves to bind the chlorine from staying suspended in the atmosphere for long periods of time before being bound in less-reactive solid or liquid compounds that can no longer circulate. Those same properties that make Freon so attractive as a refrigerant compared to other hydrocarbons also make it a royal b*tch on the environment, because it bypasses that binding process.

    Here's the (proposed) chemistry behind it, if you're interested. The reason chlorine is such a bitch is that chlorine readily forms the following progression of molecules, all of them radicals that are one valence electron short of a happy meal (so to speak):

    Cl (would-be chloride)
    ClO (would-be hypochlorite)
    ClO2 (would-be chlorite)
    ClO3 (would-be chlorate)
    ClO4 (would-be perchlorate)

    This means that, once the chlorine is released from the CFC molecule, it can react with ozone at a faster rate than the amount of ozone produced by UV bombardment. Discarding output energy that would be re-radiated as lower wavelength EM, here is a list of some of the partial reactions of the process, at least so far as I understand it (IANAC, but I'd love for one to step forward and correct me if I'm wrong):

    (Normal O3 cycle:)

    O2 + UV
    2*O (cycle entry)

    O2 + O
    O3

    O3 + UV
    O2 + O

    2*O
    O2 (cycle exit)

    (R-12 "eating" ozone:)

    CCl2F2 + 2*UV
    CClF2 + Cl + UV
    CF2 + 2*Cl (cycle entry)

    Cl + O3
    ClO + O2

    ClO + O3
    ClO2 + O2

    ClO2 + O3
    ClO3 + O2

    ClO3 + O3
    ClO4 + O2

    ClO4 + UV
    Cl + 2*O2

    2*Cl
    Cl2 (cycle exit)

    Note that, in the natural cycle, 4 O3 molecules will absorb up to 4 UV photons per iteration (slightly less in practice due to ozone's natural tendency to break down without help), whereas the chlorine radicals complete an entire iteration using only 1 UV photon. Even given that an O2 molecule can form two O3 molecules using the energy of a single UV photon, the chlorine still makes the O3 breakdown process ruthlessly more efficient.

    I used to be skeptical of the CFCs => ozone depletion arguments, but over the last decade I have to say that the evidence is mounting in favor of the theory. Unless someone else can come up with an alternate mechanism, one as supported by the evidence as the CFC theory, I for one will presume that the CFC theory is, if not perfectly correct, then the best fit for the evidence that we have.

    --
    Range Voting: preference intensity matters
  156. Re:we all know what a disaster Freon was... try ag by CTachyon · · Score: 1
    Also, freon and its sister chemicals only accounted for a very small percentage of the free chlorine radicals in the upper atmosphere. In fact one volcanic eruption in south america in the early 90's spewed about 10 times as much chlorine into the upper atmosphere as all the industrial chemicals user in human history! Now because of its stable configuration freon has a disproportionate effect, but it is still estimated by some scientists that volcanic activity has had 2 orders of magnitude more impact on the ozone layer than human activity during the period since industrial revolution.

    That's quite possibly a red herring, since the chlorine injected into the stratosphere by vulcanism is essentially accounted for on Earth's "books", whereas the chlorine added by CFCs is a new "expense" to the ozone system. We could still be putting the ozone layer "out of business" by the nickel and dime.

    --
    Range Voting: preference intensity matters
  157. Re:we all know what a disaster Freon was... try ag by afidel · · Score: 1

    Where in the hell do you think the chlorine from cfc's comes from? The earth, it all the same stuff, other than a hadfull of atoms made in cyclotrons and the few million obliterated in nuclear explosions we have not created/destroyed any elements. As I said because of the semi-stable configuration of cfc's they have a larger effect than their numbers would otherwise suggest but they are still dwarfed by naturally occouring phenomena. Oh yes and since the spotlight has moved off the ozone whole over antarctica the whole has healed over 85%.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  158. Already stealing stuff again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I "heard" from a Cable company that sounds like Romrast that microsoft will be developing this technology for the digital boxes as a future feature. Already Microsoft is working on ways they can use it to their own benefit and they haven't even built it for the people paying them for it. When it is released it will be called Free on Demand. It will allow you to view TV as normal but you can view shows and events that has happened already. Like watch the 10 0'clock news at 12. I "heard" that this person is going to try and talk them into another developer for their programming like RedHat. But, has anyone here try'd to convice a multi-billion dollar corperation that their wrong lately. It most likely won't happen.

    I'm sorry I'm weak. I want to keep my job and can't give you my name so stop asking.

  159. Re:we all know what a disaster Freon was... try ag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    How does a gas as heavy as chlorine rise above lighter gasses to the ozone layer?

    It's been a while since I took my physics classes, but wasn't one of the generic properties of gases that they diffuse kind of nicely? Not that atomic weight doesn't matter, but it's not quite as drastic as with non-mixing liquids (that form nice layers almost instantenously).

    However... don't CFCs generally also contain fluorides (hence the acronym; freon being marketing name for a CFC)? Fluor is the only gas even more active than chlorium, and wasn't that actually the bigger culprit regarding ozone? Or am I just talking out of my ass here? :-)

  160. More rebranded "Innovation" by Topgun1 · · Score: 1
    Freon will be capable of 'playing games but also offering television capabilities, such as pausing live TV and recording shows onto a computer hard drive.'

    What...like Tivo?

  161. Thanx :) by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    I try not to be a picketing, rallying, tree hugging type. I'm aiming more for the patriotic capitalist pig side of things ;)

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  162. Re:we all know what a disaster Freon was... try ag by CTachyon · · Score: 1
    Where in the hell do you think the chlorine from cfc's comes from? The earth, it all the same stuff, other than a hadfull of atoms made in cyclotrons and the few million obliterated in nuclear explosions we have not created/destroyed any elements.

    No. Fucking. Duh. However, the vast majority of chlorine used in industry comes from a natural source that is (a) always found as a solid or in aqueous solution, and (b) very inert. This source is NaCl. The commercial process used to create nearly all industrial chlorine is to take NaCl(aq), a.k.a. brine, and electrolyse it into HCl and NaOH, thus releasing it from its inert state and allowing chlorine-containing compounds with higher enthalpy to be produced. Persistent gaseous suspensions of NaCl are unheard of outside the very bottom of the troposphere, since it gets rained out rapidly, and there isn't exactly an abundance of ocean water pouring directly into the stratosphere. Use some freakin' common sense, man.

    As I said because of the semi-stable configuration of cfc's they have a larger effect than their numbers would otherwise suggest but they are still dwarfed by naturally occouring phenomena. Oh yes and since the spotlight has moved off the ozone whole over antarctica the whole has healed over 85%.

    Your facts are 10 years out of date. You have been mislead. To quote Section 3 of the faqs.org link:

    During the years 1978-1987 the hole grew, both in depth (total ozone loss in a column) and in area. This growth was not monotonic but seemed to oscillate with a two-year period (perhaps connected with the "quasibiennial oscillation" of the stratospheric winds.) The hole shrank dramatically in 1988 but in 1989-1991 was as large as in 1987, and in 1992-95 was larger still. In 1987 and 1989-95 it covered the entire Antarctic continent and part of the surrounding ocean.
    --
    Range Voting: preference intensity matters
  163. Not the first. by Martin+Spamer · · Score: 2

    I think that some of the marketing/PR people of MS have been sick / on holidays / away these times

    This is not a first for MS Marketing.

    The # symbol is read/verbalised as Hash in UK English; So C# is:

    a C Hash - A messed-up or muddled C.
    or
    C-hash - Cash.

    Your choice :)

  164. Disaster vs. Proven Harmful by ONOIML8 · · Score: 2

    I had to read what I posted several times and still I don't see where I claimed that Freon wasn't harmful to the enviroment. Actually I'm sure it was in some way.

    What I said was that it was not a disaster. Floods, volcano eruptions, earthquakes, airplanes crashing into buildings.....these things are disasters.

    If you're really wondering how it saved lives, take the time to do a little research into how Freon was used. Go visit an HVAC technician. Drop an email to Dupont. Talk to a doctor. But at least take the time to find out and don't let the enviromental extremests rule your thinking with their emotional plays.

    True, maybe Freon wasn't the best thing in the long run. Same with R12, it was just as bad. But until we knew better it was used for good, not evil.

    I a just so sick and fucking tired of comments like that being thrown into what should be reported as news. Yes, Microsoft sucks because of their strong arm tactics and lack of quality in their products. But that bit about Freon being a "disaster" had no place in the story, it was simply an enviromental wacko dig and had no place in the story.

    --
    . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
  165. Re:we all know what a disaster Freon was... try ag by suicidal · · Score: 1

    I'm still not convinced that Chlorine makes it up to the stratoshpere from turbulence, but I can tell you for certain that chlorine is the culprit. (For one thing, it's a question on the test to get your license to buy R-12 -- and what a joke that test is...answers in the front half, questions in the back half, match em up, mail it in with $$).

  166. I thought /. had scientific minded folk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If freon contains CFCs and eats up the ozone layer, what will MS Freon do?
    Ah, I see you said the magic word... if. The FACT is that while CFC's do indeed break apart ozone, unlike all those other chemicals that also break it apart... hmmm, sounded great in my head! Anyway, besides the natural breakup and renewal process of ozone... dangit!

    Ok, let me start over. It was indeed proven that the claims about CFC's were made by those who testified they lied and faked results and methods in order to recieve funding, the fact is that it does indeed break up ozone. However, the simplest fact of all is that unless there is a powerfull delivery vector, then CFC's will never reach the altitude to cause its damage in any remotely significant amount. So, if we were to follow the, ahem... logic (hahahahaha) of this reacting, errr manipulation... err I meant thinking. If we were to follow this thinking then perhaps we should not ever eat because of the noxious fumes our flatus and feces emit. I guess we should all shut down all our computers because of the lethal energy they produce (who cares that it is disipated several microns from its birth?)

    Like the wanna be linux fans (often called fanboys, zealots, morons, etc) this kind of nonsense only serves to cloud the truth, manipulate the weak and push support away. Congratulations! You get this nice shiny pin with engraved golden lightening SS's, superimposed over a hammer and sickle, and made all purty with a midground swaztica. Let us call it the 'volunteer ministry of bullshit, propoganda, intellectual enslavement and mental terrorism'

  167. right thinking? rather lobotomized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    unless you think that the phrase 'stupid sheep' is a complement and believe that blindly accepting bullshit instead of applying logic and reason is good.

    Hey! lets invent a new agenda aimed at something else completely fabricated and then get sheep to support it by putting hate-rhetoric that will attract the 'socially aware' monkeys! You people are the worst enemy of everything you verbally claim you are for. Idiots.

  168. yeah, this is totally new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    unlike:
    • Nintendo
    • Sony
    • sega
    • atari
    • activision

    this sucks quite a bit if the scenario you mention comes to pass (well it does, but it take a while), however I think we will all manage. It is not in the best economical interst (long term) for MS to ditch in anyway the support for the current platform for at least another 1.5 years, then it would enter a 4 year phase out (or so). That way they maximize their profits.

  169. Freon - a perfect name for vapourware by Mandelbrute · · Score: 2
    It had to be said.

    Good ideas in there though - but absolutly nothing that can't already be cobbled together today by amatuers with a hobby on mac, MS and *nix platforms. Getting it to be cheap will be the challenge.

  170. Mt. Pinatubo by Scott+Carnahan · · Score: 1

    In fact one volcanic eruption in south america in the early 90's spewed about 10 times as much chlorine into the upper atmosphere as all the industrial chemicals user in human history!

    I believe you are referring to Mount Pinatubo, in the Philippines. See this link for a discussion of volcanic chlorine emissions, in particular, why CFC's may have a stronger effect on stratospheric ozone. I'd like to see a source for your figure of 2 orders of magnitude.

    Certain economists had a running joke about classifying the Philippines as a Latin American country during the Asian economic boom of the 80's and early 90's, and as an Asian country during the Latin American boom (and the corresponding Asian crisis) a few years ago. Given the recent financial situation in Argentina, your geographic mistake is understandable.

    --
    "Your notation sucks!" -- Serge Lang (1927-2005)
  171. hahaha, fight fire with fire! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love it when the response to racism against blacks is to answer by racism and generality in response. Yesiiirrreee, only a redneck would come up with that. Just think! when you write/say shit like that you make someone look favoringly at the nigger post. So perhaps that is your goal, stomp on people with the 'racist' stick and then laugh as it increases the problem.

  172. Freon was patent-free for decades by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 2

    I hate to come along this late, but I found this comment in meta-mod and... According to this page on Freons, they were patented in 1928. This would have put them ex-patent in 1945.

    1. Re:Freon was patent-free for decades by snatchitup · · Score: 1

      The article has very little depth. I don't feel like doing a bunch of research on this, but I heard it from a fairly reliable source. You're onto something with duPont. Now, let's find out what the replacement for Freon is... I bet duPont, or one of its subsidiaries owns the trademark.

    2. Re:Freon was patent-free for decades by snatchitup · · Score: 1

      Okay, it looks like I'm right. The new refrigerent is HFC-134a. And you guessed it, it's got a rubber stamp approval from the EPA and is owned by duPont.

      HFC-134a is much more expensive to produce, and arguably just as bad or worse than Freon. It turns out that Freon was already under attack by generics lately. Several small producers were making alternative cheaper versions of Freon. Now, the EPA is going after these producers (guess who's $'s are helping the EPA do this)...

      So, it's not blatently cut and dry, but basically, duPont is making the new stuff, and getting the EPA to shut down competition.

  173. I think you missed the point by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 2
    CFCs were being produced world-wide for decades before the ozone layer became a political issue and the Montreal Protocol was implemented to deal with it. Even after that, CFCs were being smuggled into the USA because they are so much cheaper than HFCs. And no, most of them are not manufactured by DuPont and do not carry the Freon trademark. IIRC, China and Mexico are big producers; they were given more time, as "developing countries", to shift to non-depleting refrigerants. Of course, people there have exploited this for everything it's worth (their entrepreneurs are no less smart than our entrepreneurs).

    If you think that the ozone-depletion problem is part of a conspiracy to jack up DuPont revenues, you need to check your tinfoil hat, it's leaking.