Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Stapler, Interface, Gaming

Slashback tonight (read on below) has updates on next-generation aircraft, KDE user-interface improvements and suggestions, a special warning for those obsessed with Milton's stapler from Office Space, SmartFilter's attitude toward SourceForge, and more.

You've got to admit it's getting better all the time. Gentu writes: "In parallel to the KDE 3.1-alpha release today, OSNews published an interesting article discussing a number of User Interface issues found on KDE 3. The article suggests a number of changes, some small, some pretty drastic. Towards the end of the two-part article, the author discusses the 'integration' problem found in today's X11 desktop environments, and how fixing this issue would bring Unix closer to average Joe's desktop."

Yes, you're allowed to have more than one friend. A NuKeFaN writes: "Following the article titled Are you a Friend of GNOME I wanted to point you out that the most used GPL'd software for the Web, PHP-Nuke, also has a similar page/system for their friends. It's a Club (MandrakeClub like) where you can be a member for a little monthly fee and you can get some extra benefits. You can access the Club area to know more about it. This can be, maybe, another example of how to get some money to fund a free software project, the matter is if we, as users, will support those project's developers this way? I think we can."

Wait, the scam was to take just a few pennies from everyone! MrBlue VT writes "In reference to the previous Slashdot article about the red Swingline Staplers, I click on the add to cart button on the Swingline website, and it pops open an ordering window with a 4 staplers added to the shopping cart. Ok, I think it's a little strange, but change the quantity back to 1, and hit continue to checkout. Next thing I know, I'm looking at an order form with all the text boxes filled out with somebody else's personal information. He's from Bellvue, WA apparently (I'm in Virginia). It also has his credit card number and expiration date!

This has to be the worst security I've ever seen in an online shopping site. The company who apparently provides the online shopping service for Swingline appears to be an outfit called SureSource.

I just wanted to let anyone who happened to order from them know about this. Your credit card info could very well be compromised."

Please fasten your belts. hondo77 submitted this follow-up to this article about next-generation aircraft, writing "Boeing says that their blended-wing aircraft will be ready for test flights in 2006. The article also has a picture of a 3% scale model. See, it doesn't look like the B-2 at all."

But thanks anyhow. flonker writes "Smartfilter no longer lists sourceforge.net! Link for those who want to see for themselves."

Great at stealing them, too. MrDingusMcGee writes "After the recent posting about a study suggesting that video games decrease brain activity, I thought it would be interesting to read the results of another study which has shown that video game players score better on a range of attention tasks (mirror here)done by Shawn Green at the University of Rochester Brain and Cognitive Sciences Department, and that this could possibly rate video game players as better drivers. Worth seeing the other side of the argument and having some validation for those hours of gaming."

260 comments

  1. KDE UI article on OSNews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fantastic article on the KDE interface!!
    I hope the KDE developers will listen!

    1. Re:KDE UI article on OSNews by donutz · · Score: 2

      A lot of good suggestions indeed, but I certainly hope they don't listen to him when he suggests changing the desktop context menu by moving "Run Command" to a submenu. Don't do that, KDE developers! I've got KDE 3 set up for my dad, and I pruned as many menu items off as I could from the K program menu, and so if i'm sitting at the computer, pulling up the right-click to the desktop context menu then Run Command is a nice fast way to run stuff there isn't a menu option for. Run command is definitely general-purpose enough to keep on the main desktop context menu, not a submenu.

    2. Re:KDE UI article on OSNews by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Alt-F2, man, Alt-F2! Run Command has no business on the desktop context menu, because items on context menus should relate directly to their parent object. Context menus shouldn't be a generic drop-box for misc. useful items, because they have a specific context. Running a command line does not directly relate to the context of the desktop, which is a temporary repository for files and/or a place for keeping frequently used icons (though the panel is better for that). If anything, the "Run Command" item should be on the K menu (and I think it can be, optionally). However, simply having a keyboard shortcut for the "run command" window makes lots of sense since you need to use the keyboard anyway once you bring it up.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    3. Re:KDE UI article on OSNews by King+of+the+World · · Score: 1
      I agree, with one caveat. I don't think that run even has a place on the root hierarchy of the K-menu. The run command is a CLI programming interface - it's not an interface that (most) non-programmers want or need. It doesn't warrant such prominence.

      It should be somewhere in the menu so that programmers can get to it and drag it to where they want.

    4. Re:KDE UI article on OSNews by DEBEDb · · Score: 1

      As long as I understand in the 3.1 alpha the desktop menu is customizable, so this guy can do whatever with it :)

      --

      Considered harmful.
    5. Re:KDE UI article on OSNews by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      It's a convenience feature....

      If you hide it away, it becomes less convenient that starting Konsole and runing your command there....

      Though Alt+F2 is definitely the way to go....

      I couldn't live with an environment that didn't let me do that...

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
  2. Staplers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You did order the man 4 staplers, right? And then another 4? And then 4 more, just to be nice?

    1. Re:Staplers by unicron · · Score: 5, Funny

      I..I um, I um..I believe you have my credit card.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    2. Re:Staplers by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He's from Bellvue, WA apparently
      which is right next to Redmond, most Microsofties live in Bellvue.
      So, I'm just saying its probably justified is all :-)

    3. Re:Staplers by JPriest · · Score: 1

      I pointed out before when someone mentioned that the site went down that it's running NT 4/IIS 4. Not a platform I'd be using for a shoping cart any day soon.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    4. Re:Staplers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      First of all, the Swingline website was down this morning. And no, it was not Slashdotted -- it was Wall Street Journaled. (Really, you people amaze me. Any international news website gets more hits in an hour than Slashdot gets in a day. Consequently, the potential for a real news site to DOS a website is incredible. Slashdot is not a big deal to anyone who isn't a Linux-loser FUDdite.) Swingline's bandwidth was hosed and they put up a "we are fixing a technical problem" message for a few hours.

      When the site finally came back up, tens of thousands of Office Space fans rushed in, wanting they're very own 'tapler.

      Unfortunately, SureSource -- the unprofessional cockgobblers whom Swingline unfortunately chose as their e-commerice parter -- are apparently a bunch of amateurs. Either they were running a blatantly broken web application, or they never did any load testing. Either way, their shopping cart got confused and lost track of which cookies belonged to which sessions. Consequently, when User A tried to add a red Swingline to his shopping cart, he may have been adding it to User B's shopping cart. So, when User B went to check out, he might have seen several more staplers in his shopping cart than he expected to see. User B would then try to go back and delete the extra staplers, but in fact was deleting staplers from User C's cart. And because SureSource stores the user's already-entered personal data in the session, User C might see User B's name, address, phone number, and email address prepopulating the address form when he goes to check out.

      That, my friends, is a problem. But the really big fucking problem is that SureSource were storing already-entered credit-card information somewhere in the session, too. There's a chance that anyone who tried to check out saw anyone else's credit card data.

      I know this because I, very happy to finally be ordering the stapler after several hours of Swingline's downtime, attempted to fix my shopping cart several times before coming to the conclusion that SureSource are a bunch of fucktards. I was not very happy when, several hours later, I received several warning emails from some kind souls who happened to see my contact information and credit card info. I also received several phone calls.

      I would like to take this opportunity to thank everyone who emailed or phoned any person whose personal data they saw to warn them. For some of you, those were long distance phone calls. We are very, very grateful.

      Swingline heard about the fiasco pretty quick, and pulled the SureSource shopping cart link from their website. They've added a SureSource telephone number that you can call to order instead. Ha! In order for their telephone operators to fuck up as badly as they're "web developers" did, they would have to answer the phone by saying, "Hello, this is SureSource, would you like several people's credit card and billing information free of charge?"

      The bottom line is that SureSource are unprofessional scum. I have never seen such maliciously broken software on the Web in years, and I hope that they get their dumb asses shut down by the Better Business Bureau. Hey, guys! If you're a bunch of lightweights, don't take contracts from companies with real volume!

      Swingline, I hope, will drop SureSource by the end of the week. You, reader, can expedite that. Please, don't call SureSource and order a 'tapler. Instead, contact Swingline and tell them that you will not purchase a stapler until they find a different e-commerce partner. As it is, Swingline is a party to what is one of the most potentially damaging credit card problems I've seen on the Web. I'm not bullshitting you. The Wall Street Journal has a large userbase, and that link propagated to sites like Slashdot well before the morning was over. Think about how many people have seen that page. Think about how many have ordered. And think about the fact that for every person kindhearted enough to warn his fellow man to watch his credit card statement, there is probably another person evil enough to cut'n'paste the data into a text file. SureSource gave those people my name, billing address, email address, phone number, credit card number, credit card type, and expiration date. If that isn't enough to pull of some heinous identity theft, I don't know what is.

      And if you don't boycott Swingline for others' sake, do it for your own sake. If SureSource is unprofessional enough to use untested software on an e-commerce site -- and believe me, that's the kind of shit that QA folks find pretty quick -- then who's to say that their internal credit card databases aren't just as easily compromised?

      Even Milton, my friends, didn't need his 'tapler that bad.

      Thank you for your time.

    5. Re:Staplers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe SureSource just had a disgruntled employee who though that burning down the place would be a leetle bit too obvious?

    6. Re:Staplers by donpardo · · Score: 1

      SureSource -- the unprofessional cockgobblers

      Don't you mean no-talent ass clowns?

      --
      Nothing to see here. Move along.
    7. Re:Staplers by Kallahar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One thing about those big sites is that they rarely link to another site. I can't tell you how many times I've read a CNN story that had ZERO links or domain names. They often will link internally to their own stories, but they try hard to not send people off their site. Slashdot, on the other hand, exists solely on links, with just minor blurbs to get people to go to the site.

      But you do bring up many good points :)

      Travis

    8. Re:Staplers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any self respecting office worker wouldn't be caught dead with a swingline. Stanley Bostitch Rules!

    9. Re:Staplers by bing · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that they used a timestamp-based algorithm to define their cookies, so if they were creating more than a session/second, they were screwed.

      This would definitely make them amateurs of the worst order.

    10. Re:Staplers by John+Sullivan · · Score: 1
      I have never seen such maliciously broken software on the Web in years

      Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.

      Anyway, why the big stapler fetish all of a sudden? They're only staplers FFS. I don't get it...

      --
      This is my World Wide Web of Whatever
    11. Re:Staplers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for SureSource, and I resent being called a fuck tard. I am a cheese dick.

  3. cant buy the stapler now by VS1 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    the buy link is gone, it could be my crap-a-rific ie6 browser though thats making a mistake. i know its bad, no need to tell me.

    --
    "Humanize war? You might as talk about humanizing hell!" -- British Admiral Jacky Fisher
    1. Re:cant buy the stapler now by CMiYC · · Score: 1

      it could be my crap-a-rific ie6 browser though thats making a mistake. i know its bad, no need to tell me.

      So then why are you using it?

    2. Re:cant buy the stapler now by VS1 · · Score: 1

      just reinstalled xp, and im too lazy to get opera just yet. really. i am.

      --
      "Humanize war? You might as talk about humanizing hell!" -- British Admiral Jacky Fisher
    3. Re:cant buy the stapler now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just reinstalled xp

      AHHHHHHH RUN AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      gooby gook 3573573 dhf wio owb wot wto uwotbw wt

    4. Re:cant buy the stapler now by Archfeld · · Score: 2

      rendered just fine in my ie6. not that it isn't crap mind you but just pointing out....

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  4. Swingline's site by CheechBG · · Score: 2, Informative

    it would appear that they took out the online purchase option, opting instead for phone orders through SureSource. Oh well, I really had no need for a fire-engine red stapler anyway :)

    1. Re:Swingline's site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This post is 1 minute before the post marked +5 Informative. WHAT THE FUCK. seriously slashdot editors. are you dyslexic? And no this isnt the guy who posted its Agent Pothead, but its just cruel what u did.

  5. Staplers Now Off-Line by Myriad · · Score: 5, Informative
    I just checked the Swingline website and it looks like the on-line order button has been removed and replaced with:

    To place an order for the Rio Red Stapler (SKU#: S7074740), Please call SureSource at: 1-800-544-3243.

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
    1. Re:Staplers Now Off-Line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...it looks like the on-line order button has been removed...

      But other products still have the order button.

      Weird.

      And they're slashdotted, too! Poor Swingline.

    2. Re:Staplers Now Off-Line by douglas+jeffries · · Score: 5, Informative

      it appears they just commented out the html. seems like a quick hack, but who views source anyway?

      <!--<a href="#"onClick="javascript:popUp2('http://www.acc o-store.com/cgi-bin/sgic0101.exe?HKW=CO01DIV01+COD IV=0101+QTY=1+UID=1613471026418266609+ITN=S7074740 ')"><img border="0" src="/images/sw/sw-add-to-cart.gif" alt="Buy from SureSource"></a>-->

    3. Re:Staplers Now Off-Line by MattCohn.com · · Score: 0

      Thank you for the link.

      Unfortunently, upon trying the link I did not experiance the same symptomes. Mabey it was a glitch, mabey a coincidence combined with a VERY HORIBLE way of maintaining session (My bet). Well, this is why I only purchase online from well known large companies that would have people sueing their asses off if anything like this were uncovered.

    4. Re:Staplers Now Off-Line by acoustiq · · Score: 1, Funny
      it appears they just commented out the html. seems like a quick hack, but who views source anyway?

      Hey! You found an Easter egg!

      --

      --
      I romp with joy in the bookish dark
    5. Re:Staplers Now Off-Line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd bet it's still easily hackable by substituting different values for certain parameters (e.g. UID).

    6. Re:Staplers Now Off-Line by tiwason · · Score: 1

      heh.... i went to check out and it looks like I'm buying 4 staples under:

      hai R larious
      Nice security guys!!
      Mission Viejo
      407-865-4568

      somebady gonna be working through the weekend....

    7. Re:Staplers Now Off-Line by ulmanms · · Score: 1

      I had to go check this out, and not only do you see the information from the last person who ordered (I'm presuming), but THAT PAGE ISN'T ENCRYPTED.

      Non-SSL'd CC transmission, now that's livin'.
    8. Re:Staplers Now Off-Line by CitznFish · · Score: 1

      Bummer. I can't get anyone elses CC info. Seems they fixed the glitch.

      --
      'mmmmmmmmm.... forbidden donut'
    9. Re:Staplers Now Off-Line by SixStars · · Score: 1

      You do, it seems.

  6. fax-something-unique-to-8889771577 ? by cperciva · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can someone explain where the fax-something-unique-to-8889771577 bit comes in? I can't see any connection to any of the stories.

    1. Re:fax-something-unique-to-8889771577 ? by peterdaly · · Score: 5, Funny

      They will hate me for putting this idea into people's minds...but everyone I explain this to gets a kick out of it, so here goes.

      1. Take 5 sheets of black construction paper.
      2. Scotch tape them into a single 5 sheet long sheet.
      3. Place start of "page" into fax machine.
      4. Dial the "recipient".
      5. Watch sheet start going into the fax machine with glee.
      6. Once out the other side, Scotch Tape beginning of "sheet" to end of sheet forming a giant black loop.
      7. Giggle like a teenage girl and show your co-workers. Trust me, the showing co-workers step is needed for the full satisfaction. Choose co-workers carefully.
      8. You Are Done! Not only that, but the recipient is now out of ink or toner.

      Not that I have ever done this...but I know someone who has done this to someone who kept sending them spam faxes.

      I hold no responsibility for your actions yada yada...

      -Pete
      BTW - comment posting is screwed.

    2. Re:fax-something-unique-to-8889771577 ? by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unless your "victim" has something more sophisticated than a fax machine, like say a PC with a fax modem or a fax server. In that case you're just tying up a phone line.

      And, why bother with the construction paper? Just a FAX modem, an all-black TIFF file and some know-how and you can do the same job in a much more reliable way (the tape seams tend to fray and split after 15 or so passses). And, it'll be more impressive to your cow-orkers.

    3. Re:fax-something-unique-to-8889771577 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hrmms....

      I've been trying with my fax machine for about 30 minutes now...and the number is still busy.

    4. Re:fax-something-unique-to-8889771577 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And, it'll be more impressive to your cow-orkers.

      That's certainly debatable. I'd be much more impressed by a spinning wheel of toner depletion than a boring .tiff image.

    5. Re:fax-something-unique-to-8889771577 ? by orthogonal · · Score: 3, Funny

      But you're not really 133t until you twist the fifth sheet through 180 degrees before attaching it to the first. For best results, fax from 662-487... (MOBIUS).

    6. Re:fax-something-unique-to-8889771577 ? by wompser · · Score: 1

      Of course *were* someone to do this, they would have to be pretty careful... It is not hard to look at the fax's header and trace you company name-phone #

      DOH!!!!

      --
      .....
    7. Re:fax-something-unique-to-8889771577 ? by evilempireinc · · Score: 3, Funny

      while it very well might be easier to just use a fax modem, I just don't think it would provide the same level of satisfaction that you would get from watching the black paper loop through the machine over and over again until you are disconnected. It also beats pasting that same black tiff into a document till it 1000 pages long

      --
      we can rebuild this sig. we have the technology
    8. Re:fax-something-unique-to-8889771577 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A quick little signature-line blurb about knowing that it's really-really easy to change that number/company-name in the fax machine would assure more people you aren't stupid.

    9. Re:fax-something-unique-to-8889771577 ? by istartedi · · Score: 2

      You're not looking at both sides of the issue. (groan)

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    10. Re:fax-something-unique-to-8889771577 ? by JWCoder · · Score: 0

      Well... a quick search on google brings to light that it might be a company called "Vortex Supplies"...
      http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&l r=&ie=ISO-8859 -1&newwindow=1&safe=off&q=888+977+1577

      Following the top link returned:
      http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/toll-free- spam/1-888- 977-1577-fax.txt

      up to:
      http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/

      reveals that these are alleged Fax spammers.

      Maybe slashdot wants 'slashdot effect' someone Fax line, eh?

    11. Re:fax-something-unique-to-8889771577 ? by penguinboy · · Score: 2

      The header (CSID) really means nothing, as it can be set by the sender. Only caller ID can be even remotely trusted to be true.

    12. Re:fax-something-unique-to-8889771577 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Only caller ID can be even remotely trusted to be true.

      Except, of course, if you're sending the fax from a larger office, which probably has digital lines, and you're willing to screw with them. ;)

    13. Re:fax-something-unique-to-8889771577 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or you press *67 to block caller ID

    14. Re:fax-something-unique-to-8889771577 ? by Your+Pal+Dave · · Score: 1
      or you press *67 to block caller ID
      This won't work on a toll-free number. WATS lines can have something called ANI which always passes your number. Plus, your number will show up on their monthly bill.

      Reference: http://web.textfiles.com/phreak/beatcid.txt
    15. Re:fax-something-unique-to-8889771577 ? by brad3378 · · Score: 2
      You Rock!

      How's this? (never tried it yet)

      In States that charge for pop-can / soda-can deposits, we have automated machines that you stick the cans in for your refund. You stick the can in the machine, it gets crushed, and when you're done a refund receipt gets printed out.

      My idea

      Cut out the UPC symbol from a refundable bottle/can

      Get a long stick and a roll of scotch tape

      Tape the UPC on the stick

      "Probe" the machine with the stick.

      Not sure if it would work.
      There might be a mechanism that determines if a can has been crushed.


      I hold no responsibility for machines you start probing.

      --

    16. Re:fax-something-unique-to-8889771577 ? by alfredw · · Score: 2

      And, why bother with the construction paper? Just a FAX modem, an all-black TIFF file and some know-how and you can do the same job
      in a much more reliable way (the tape seams tend to fray and split after 15 or so passses). And, it'll be more impressive to your cow-orkers.


      Nah, I think you lose some of the sheer glee of watching that black loop go around and around and around and around...

      It's a truly euphoric experience!

      --
      In Soviet Russia, sig types you!
    17. Re:fax-something-unique-to-8889771577 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you think the machine scans the UPC for what reason?

      Have you seen how hard it can be for grocery clerks to scan things (especially 12 oz cans), much less some automated system?

      Less crack please.

    18. Re:fax-something-unique-to-8889771577 ? by Conspir8or · · Score: 1

      I had heard of this trick before, except instead of black paper, the user photocopies his or her hand giving the finger, then tapes those copies together, etc.

      I agree with the co-worker spectator sport aspect of it. I would undoubtedly have that calliope music that Homer Simpson hears while thinking of joining the Krusty Klown Kollege running through my head while watching the flying finger of death burnin' up the fax line.

      Posted for informational purposes only,
      Conspir8or

    19. Re:fax-something-unique-to-8889771577 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nah, I think you lose some of the sheer glee of watching that black loop go around and around and around and around...

      It's a truly euphoric experience!

      You really are beyond any form of medical assistance, aren't you?

    20. Re:fax-something-unique-to-8889771577 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There ought to be a much more elegant way to do this ... fax is just a digitally compressed stream, after all. I've contemplated reading the spec and seeing if there something like a way to code for a one-mile long black bar. The implementation is left as an exercise...

      Even if it's only RLL encoded on a scanline basis, simply generating the datastream would be a cool hack. And it would only tie up a modem.

      Do I need to point out that the owner of a 1-800 type number gets ANI (Automatic Number Identification), which is not blockable. Harassing phone calls are illegal nearly everywhere. Don't do this at home.

    21. Re:fax-something-unique-to-8889771577 ? by wompser · · Score: 1

      And I would also be assured you were not stupid, had you been man enough to try and flame me from you own account anom cow...

      --
      .....
    22. Re:fax-something-unique-to-8889771577 ? by quantaman · · Score: 2

      the tape seams tend to fray and split after 15 or so passses

      Ummm... Perhaps you meant to add, "or so they tell me"

      --
      I stole this Sig
  7. Shopping Cart by jfroot · · Score: 5, Informative

    These kind of errors are usually caused by the shopping cart using your IP address to identify your session. If you and someone else are both shopping on the site and are going through the same proxy, you will see each others cart.

    1. Re:Shopping Cart by edrugtrader · · Score: 2

      UM. NO.

      this was caused by an overloaded server, with poor coding that allowed for race conditions.

      no more, no less.

      --
      MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    2. Re:Shopping Cart by Snoopy77 · · Score: 1

      Maybe so, but in this case they guys were in totally different states. Do you honestly think they are both going through the same proxy server?

      --
      "She's a West Texas girl, just like me" - G.W Bush Iraqis
    3. Re:Shopping Cart by Fazed · · Score: 1

      Bullshit.

      The cart id was part of the link...

    4. Re:Shopping Cart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe so, but in this case they guys were in totally different states. Do you honestly think they are both going through the same proxy server?

      aol?

    5. Re:Shopping Cart by cpeterso · · Score: 2


      They might use the same proxy server if they are both AOL users. From what I've heard, AOL has about two dozen proxy servers between their users and the untamed internet. Their user proxy server assignments are dynamic and can even change during a shopping-cart session. This unexpected shifting of IP addresses caused problems for a web app people at my work were developing..

    6. Re:Shopping Cart by edrugtrader · · Score: 2

      ok... so for 'security' reasons, the credit card processing system is seperate from the web server... the cart software requests the user information from the credit card processing system, and gives it somesort of ID... the credit card processing system didn't properly lock out race conditions and sent the info to the wrong requesting cart.

      so my reply is simply: bullshit.

      --
      MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    7. Re:Shopping Cart by Snoopy77 · · Score: 1

      Well I stand corrected. Being an Australian AOL != Internet here.

      --
      "She's a West Texas girl, just like me" - G.W Bush Iraqis
    8. Re:Shopping Cart by captainstupid · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's NOT it.
      I ended up with someone in the dept. of Comp Sci at the U of Wisconsin's shopping cart. I was at the U of Akron in Ohio. No freaking AOL on either end. No proxy servers either. It looked like the server was mishandling session ID's. Or maybe they were using a freaking client side cursor. Either way, not good.

      --
      "Anyway, long story short... is a phrase whose origins are complicated and rambling...." - Abraham Simpson
    9. Re:Shopping Cart by leuk_he · · Score: 2

      but if i use the link(from a previouse comment) i see somebody elses info.

      Somebody did clear the credit card info. too bad.

    10. Re:Shopping Cart by jdavidb · · Score: 2

      Actually, I think these kinds of errors are usually caused by seeing the quoted rates of the contractor you wanted to get to create your ecommerce site and saying, "Can't we get anyone cheaper?" :)

    11. Re:Shopping Cart by MrBlue+VT · · Score: 1

      Definately not going through AOL. No proxy servers either.

    12. Re:Shopping Cart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These kind of errors are usually caused by the shopping cart using your IP address to identify your session.

      One word answer: NO. Quit talking out of your ass. How was the parent modded up as informative? OMFG!

  8. Add to cart taken down by redgekko · · Score: 0, Redundant
    It seems they've taken down their "add to cart" button for the red stapler, although you can still order other staplers online... I didn't see the bug though.

    My guess is that the person who experienced this bug was on a corporate lan with a single gateway IP, maybe cookies were also disabled or screwed up, and SureSource's session tracking code freaked and a session was hijacked.

    --
    Slashdot: rejecting tech news in favor of rubber band guns since 1997.
    1. Re:Add to cart taken down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice sig lol

  9. Yeah! by NetJunkie · · Score: 1

    GTA3 is such a GREAT game. I should go play...hmmm...

  10. Re:do you have "terrible" karma? by VS1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    i dont know if its a "Major Change".

    --
    "Humanize war? You might as talk about humanizing hell!" -- British Admiral Jacky Fisher
  11. Re:do you have "terrible" karma? by stressky · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Haha... gotta love the humour in that one..

    tho personally, I'd like captions such as "Certified troll" for extreme low karma, and "should get a life" for high...

    Add a bit of humour to the equation - I've noticed that many slashdotters have a habbit of taking themselves a little too seriously.

    But then, I'm Australian....

    --
    ...this is getting out of hand
  12. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by Kenja · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have never lurked around dark tunnels running from ghosts and eating pills I find on the ground. I have never had the urge to strut up and down the street making Boop Boop noises. I have never felt the need to grab a BFG and go hunting demons. Video games have yet to affect my real life at all (other then reducing the amount of time I spend there). If you don't want your kids to play these games don't let them. Do not turn to society as a whole to police what your kids can do.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  13. Always hated the "About" menu item by FattMattP · · Score: 5, Insightful
    There's one thing about pretty much every GUI program that I really hate. It's the About menu item. It never tells me about the program. It just tells me who wrote it and what the copyright is. That sort of stuff should be moved into a Credits menu item and the About menu item should devote a few sentences to telling me what the program does.

    I ran into this problem a lot when I first started using both GNOME and KDE. I had no idea what half the programs did and there was no clue within the program itself. After a while it became too much of a drag to go find the docs just to read a one paragraph summary of what a given program was. I would hope that in the future developers would start putting a small description of their program within the About menu item.

    --
    Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    1. Re: Always hated the "About" menu item by Pseudonym · · Score: 2

      Personally, I've never understood why exiting a program is a "File" operation, either.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    2. Re:Always hated the "About" menu item by BeBoxer · · Score: 2

      This is a good point, especially in the era of free software. With commercial software, if you are running it you probably know what it does. At least I hope you had some idea before you paid for it. But with free software, you might have hundreds of programs installed that you've never heard of. And since half the GUI apps out there look essentially the same, with some menus, a toolbar on the top, maybe a palatte on the left and some sort of workspace taking up the balance of the window. A short paragraph saying what the program does, and what makes it special would be nice.

      Take editors. My system has three apps under the Editor item on my Kmenu: Kate, KEdit, and KWrite. Here's what how they describe themselves:

      "KWrite - Leightweight Kate"
      "Kate - KDE Advanced Text Editor"
      and the winner for least information:
      KEdit "A KDE Text Editor"

      A few sentences describing what makes each one special or unique would be helpful. I don't want to have to scrub thru all the menu's trying to figure out what differs. Oh well.

    3. Re: Always hated the "About" menu item by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      Wow, that took me back. I used to have a huge issue with this, and have since completely forgotten and accepted it.

      Scary thing, complacency is.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    4. Re:Always hated the "About" menu item by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fucking whiny bitch.

      dumbass:~# ln -s /usr/bin/apropos /usr/bin/about
      dumbass:~# about xterm
      xterm (1x) - terminal emulator for X


      suck my balls.

  14. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by pyrrho · · Score: 1


    don't you realize that slaves need violent catharsis... you probably think the roman colloseum was bad too...

    I agree with you. This stuff is pathetic. Making it illegal won't make society better. Asking "why is this the catharsis these kids choose" might, however.

    In general, I don't mind violence in some video games, it's utter domination of the media is really really sad, however.

    Please, don't anyone bother to point me at non-violent games... try getting a job in the game industry and find out that 99% of them are making this kind of junk.

    And yeah yeah, I know, you love the game but would never do that in real life... so? I hate the game and wouldn't do it in real life either. Why would you want to phantasize about something you would not do in real life, again? Why does it make you feel good?

    Pent up slave-resentment is my Nietzschean Guess.

    --

    -pyrrho

  15. Do your civic duty! by Kredal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Click here and change the category from "none" to "criminal skills". Don't let your children (or cow-orkers) visit a criminal orgainization!

    --
    Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    1. Re:Do your civic duty! by VRisaMetaphor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Damn cow-orkers can visit goatse for all I care! If I ever catch them orking my cows again, I will shoot them, I swear.

    2. Re:Do your civic duty! by alan_d_post · · Score: 1

      wonderful post!

    3. Re:Do your civic duty! by SiMac · · Score: 0, Troll

      Don't forget to click here and select "Extreme"!

    4. Re:Do your civic duty! by Burgundy+Advocate · · Score: 1, Troll

      I've got a better idea.

      Go here and change the category from "Sex, Extreme" to "Art and Culture".

      We must preserve The Goatse for future generations. I'm positive it will go down as the internet equivalent of the Mona Lisa. We cannot allow a few conservatives and their offended sensibilities to block this True Piece of Art and Culture.

      Vote early, vote often!

      --
      Dragging people kicking and screaming into reality since 1996.
    5. Re:Do your civic duty! by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 4, Funny

      OK, so I can classify www.microsoft.com, but what category?

      Cults/Occult
      The cult of Bill is strong in this one my master.
      Criminal Skills
      Microsoft has stolen more of my time than you will ever believe.
      Drugs
      Many things from there seem to be designed with the aid of drugs
      Entertainment
      Ha! IE crashed again and took out my shell, FUNNY!!!!
      Extreme
      Prices, yes.
      Gambling
      20-1 Blue Screen of death on next restart...
      Hate Speech
      Read the opinions on Sun, or Linux, or MacOS, or Java, or...
      Humor
      "We only do things to help our customers, we like innovating, not squelching competition".. Hilarious
      Investing
      I Invest too much time in MS crap.
      Job Search
      Can i find a job that doesn't require Exchange and Outlook on the desktop?
      MP3
      After the new MS patch erases all of yours, you'll be looking for more.
      Mature
      I'll grow old before this works
      Nude
      YIKES! A bunch of large gutted psty faced, large gutted engineers, I'd rather look at goatse.cx
      Politics/Religion
      Billy has bought a bunch of politicians, and it the cult of MS certainly is a religion.
      Self Help
      They sure ain't helping ya.
      Sports
      Monitor chucking? Or shotgun blasts (keeping with the Office Space theme)
      Travel
      "Calgon, take me away!!!!

      No trolls were harmed in the making of this message.

  16. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Heh. I have been playing GTA3 (way too much actually) for the last week. Let me tell you something, I about died laughing when I managed to run over a person with a boat. (That was a sight to see!) Just for giggles, I like to run around and wallop people with a bat. Sometimes, I take the sniper rifle and blow people's heads off for no real reason other than it's fun to watch. Sometimes I instigate car chases with the cops just for the thrill of seeing how many I can take out before they take me out.

    So I'm somebody that's more likely to go commit a crime, right? Wrong. GTA 3 is a hell of a lot of fun to play, but let me tell you something: That game taught me that the last thing I want to do is play games with cops.

    The thought of ramming a cop car and seeing how far he and his buddies will chase me scares the shit out of me. Why? Because even in a game where my car can put up with a good deal more abuse than my real car can, I can't get away from the cops. The only real chance I have of getting away involves luck. That's it, luck. They will get me.

    If anything, I think GTA 3 will reduce hoodlumism. Why? Because the physics in the game are a little different than they are in real life. For example: You can mow down a stoplight and still keep tooling along at 90 mph. In real life, striking a stoplight would end the chase rather suddenly.

    Things happen much faster on GTA than they would in real life. Cars acellerate faster, and you can keep the chase going much longer than you possibly could in real life. And geez, there's no way you're going to acquire grenades to lob at people. GTA 3 really spoils reality for people. It's a lot more fun to destroy stuff in GTA 3 than it could possibly be in real life.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  17. Newton's 3rd Law of Studies by prockcore · · Score: 5, Funny

    For every study, there is an equal and opposite study.

  18. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by URoRRuRRR · · Score: 1

    sometimes we need to curb our liberties to guard our safety.

    Those who will give up a little bit of liberty for a little bit of safety deserve neither liberty nor safety- Benjamin Franklin.

    Give me Liberty- the first misson of GTA3.

    That Nightline was very slanted. They don't show the part where you fight to try to cripple drug traffickers. They don't show the part where the cops (almost) always arrest you for the crimes you commit. There have been NO reported incidents of crime related to the original GTA and GTA 2. Guess how many GTA III has caused? Zero. Why?

    Perhaps it's the fact that most people can tell the difference between a videogame and real life. Walk up to a car and open the door and throw the person out. Go ahead. In GTA III it happens fluidly, however in real life, the doors may be locked, the person may be wearing a seatbelt, and they might punch you in the face and shoot you.

    Video games create an escape, they allow people to release their stress in a way that nobody gets hurt. They are also a scapegoat for bad parenting. Do you really think that the Columbine shooters decided to shoot people at their school because they played doom?

    "Wow! This game is great! You get to kill Monsters!"
    "Wow! That is great! Let's kill people at our school!"

    NOBODY has ever killed somebody else because of a video game. There's many other factors. Depression, social ills, neglect all cause a person to "Flip out" and kill somebody else more than any video game.

    --
    "Oh no, 3 horny women and only 2 condoms...Thank god I read slashdot"
  19. The obvious answer by Weasel+Boy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "It frightens me that we allow these sort of games to be played by our youth"

    So don't allow your kids to play these kinds of games. Duh. The answer to mature subject matter is attentive parenting, not government curbs on basic rights.

    This point is so basic... I don't even know why I'm letting you jerk my chain. You can't be serious. I should just mod "-1 troll" and move on.

    1. Re:The obvious answer by Sheetrock · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Actually, while that would seem to be the ideal answer, sadly, many stores will happily sell these sorts of games to teenagers without letting parents know. Congress is poised to make this sort of thing a federal crime, which while harsh is an excellent first step towards curbing underage viewing of what I would term 'a pornography of violence'. However, the only long term solution is to follow the more enlightened policies of some European countries and ban this sort of trash outright. Nazi symbolism is outlawed overseas to prevent the most horrible of atrocities from resurfacing in our youth, so why do we permit this promotion of antisocial behavior wrapped in a shiny teen-friendly package?

      I honestly don't mean to troll, but am merely providing an alternative opinion that I know won't wash very well here. I never understood why people who ostensibly promote free speech actually just mean free speech that agrees with their thoughts.

      --

      Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
      -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    2. Re:The obvious answer by numark · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First off, I'll say that I respect your view, even if I wholeheartedly disagree with it.

      That said, I believe that this problem still can be solved by attentive parenting. Even if a store sells a violent game to a teenager, it seems unlikely that teenager would be able to keep their parents from ever discovering the game.

      If parents don't approve of certain games, they can merely randomly observe what their child is playing. They can easily do this by placing the gaming system in a common area, such as a living room or study. If a parent isn't willing to do this to enforce their rules and views, then the problem lies with the parents, not with the store or the video game manufacturer.

      Government is not meant to be an end-all and be-all for the "sanitation" of our lives. This especially holds true in America, where we have the fundamental right to make decisions for ourselves and our children with a minimum of governmental interference. If we want freedom of speech for ourselves, we also have to advocate freedom of speech for those who disagree with us and our views. It's that simple.

      --
      Want Slashdot headlines on your site? Try SlashHead
    3. Re:The obvious answer by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 1

      Holding stores accountable, that's an interesting viewpoint. I'm not sure if I agree with it or not... but it seems like a nice compromise (banning stores from selling adult games to children). Banning it outright, that's just unacceptable, and unless you change the constitution, ain't gonna happen.

      I will not allow the freespeech clause to be taken away or altered just so that bad parents don't have to watch their children anymore.

      I'm currently allowed to burn the flag, hell I could make a t-shirt with our pres on it, with big flaming words saying "praying for a congenital heart defect." The day some idiot touches the first amendment is the day I buy an island and start up my own country.

      --
      The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
    4. Re:The obvious answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nazi symbolism is outlawed overseas to prevent the most horrible of atrocities from resurfacing in our youth

      Tell me again how outlawing swastikas prevents neo-Naziism? Are you contending that if we ban Barney infantile behavior will cease?

  20. Quick Browser in KDE 3 by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 2

    In the KDE UI article, he suggests only letting root browse the / directory, and everyone else only their home directory. Why? Normal users need to browse the main directory tree, and can be limited from areas they shouldn't be with the mode bits. Dropping that ability would just be plain annoying.

    1. Re:Quick Browser in KDE 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a normal unix, a user should only have power and interest only in his/her home directory. Only root should be interested in the / dir.

      In real life, people are using Linux at home, want to do things throughout /, but they shouldn't do that in a corporate environment.

    2. Re:Quick Browser in KDE 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She. The author is a she.

    3. Re:Quick Browser in KDE 3 by BeBoxer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, I don't think that's what he's recommending. He's talking about the desktop context menu, and whether or not it should include a "Quick Browser" item like the KMenu does. He thinks that a normal user should have his home directory available there, and root should have / available there. Both of which seem quite reasonable. Being able to open a new window to any directory with a right click on the desktop is a feature I use a lot in BeOS. It's not unreasonable to reduce clutter by only have ~ there for normal users. They can still get to / thru other means if they need to.

    4. Re:Quick Browser in KDE 3 by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2

      No, no, you've got it all wrong. It says "Browse /." It's an efficiency improvement, so the KDE user can always get to his or her favourite web site within a couple of clicks.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    5. Re:Quick Browser in KDE 3 by mrroach · · Score: 1

      Who in the world is running KDE as root? I can understand running some _applications_ as root, eg package/user management but come on, the whole of KDE? That is a no-no.

      Besides that, I don't think that kde should be hard-coding any settings for a particular user anyway.

    6. Re:Quick Browser in KDE 3 by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Who in the world is running KDE as root?

      At home, on a single user test machine, why not? Its not like there's going to be anything important on the machine, and you're the only one logged on...

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    7. Re:Quick Browser in KDE 3 by mrroach · · Score: 1

      Well I assume that even if there is not important data on the system, you want to keep your system functional. The likelyhood of screwing something up as root is much higher. Additionally, if you are logged in as root, processes that run wild can easily take down the whole system.

      Conversely, sinse you are the one starting with a questionable premise, why _would_ you? It's not as though you need to have access to config files constantly,or run only apps that require root access, is it?

    8. Re:Quick Browser in KDE 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's bad practice, but I too occasionally run KDE as root for the same reason I run anything as root - to admin the system. I get out quickly to a user with less privledges though - so you can put away that gun...

    9. Re:Quick Browser in KDE 3 by shepd · · Score: 1

      >The likelyhood of screwing something up as root is much higher. Additionally, if you are logged in as root, processes that run wild can easily take down the whole system.

      Agreed, of course.

      >Conversely, sinse you are the one starting with a questionable premise, why _would_ you?

      Well, because I'm lazy and its a home machine -- It just doesn't have that much important stuff on it. Its for surfing the web, watching TV, playing MP3s and movies. All of which I can fix in a heartbeat. Although, it sure would be a bummer if an app locked up the machine while I was watching TV or a movie.

      Elsewhere, I'm normally much more careful. Normally... >:-D

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    10. Re:Quick Browser in KDE 3 by Charm · · Score: 1
      he suggests

      I think you'll find that he is a she.

      --
      -- RTFM:Slackware::Beer:Saturday
    11. Re:Quick Browser in KDE 3 by bigpat · · Score: 2

      Female slashdotters? When did that happen?

    12. Re:Quick Browser in KDE 3 by Hellkitten · · Score: 1

      At home, on a single user test machine

      Testing what? If you talk about you trying out linux then ok go ahead, but don't complain to me when you rm -rf the wrong place and has to reinstall the os instead of just the user files

      On the other hand if you talk about test, as in testing software then you're a fool. Software should be tested running as user, unless it's a tool for root

      --
      - We are the slashdot. Resistance is futile. Prepare to be moderated -
    13. Re:Quick Browser in KDE 3 by shepd · · Score: 1

      >If you talk about you trying out linux then ok go ahead, but don't complain to me when you rm -rf the wrong place and has to reinstall the os instead of just the user files

      Well, I'm not really testing out Linux (I've been using it for over 5 years! :-) but mostly the second kind of testing, which you said...

      >On the other hand if you talk about test, as in testing software then you're a fool. Software should be tested running as user, unless it's a tool for root

      Look, I've got a box that I like to use to play about with any new software I feel like. This isn't testing for a company, just testing out new stuff for fun. Since I do a lot of DVD and Video Capture work with that machine it gets screwed all the time anyways, not to mention the helluva time I had getting stuff to work properly for video capture as a non-root user (it was a long time since I tried that -- I think it was back in the 2.0 kernel days -- probably worth another look).

      As long as the box doesn't set on fire, it doesn't matter to me what it does! :-)

      Of course, if I were doing this professionally I'd have no business doing everything as root. But since I'm not and I don't care all that much about the data on this box (it gets wiped pretty often by me anyways) and I don't use anything but non-executable data from this box elsewhere, AND I keep it firewalled away from the world, I doubt there's much for me to worry about...

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    14. Re:Quick Browser in KDE 3 by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 2

      In the English language, the masculine pronouns may be used in a gender-nonspecific manner when one is unaware of the actual state of affairs.

    15. Re:Quick Browser in KDE 3 by BeBoxer · · Score: 2

      Besides that, I don't think that kde should be hard-coding any settings for a particular user anyway.

      Well, root is a special case for a lot of things. Many programs need to behave differently depending on whether or not they are running as root. For that matter, they even need to worry about whether they are actually root, or just SUID root (comparing the UID vs. the EUID). Take ping. It has to be SUID so it can open a raw socket to craft the ICMP packets on. But it has to check and see if it's really root running the program to determine if certain options (flood pinging for example) are allowed.

      On the other hand, maybe the only special code KDE should put in is a block in kdm which prevents root from logging in. As you stated, it's not an especially good idea.

    16. Re:Quick Browser in KDE 3 by Hellkitten · · Score: 1

      Seems I wasn't completely clear in my earlier post

      When I talked about testing I didn't mean trying out some software. I talked about testing software in developement, which should be done with root privileges only if the result is intended to be run as root

      You seem to fit better into the first category (as do I by the way) that "test linux / play around", so by all means run as root. OTOH if you intend to use linux professionally trying to get the system to work for users is a valuable experience.

      .........root.......firewall.....

      Firewall is nice but it won't help you if you download a fixed program and run it, and if you run it as root that l33t h4z0r will have a very easy time, I'd check my sources at least.

      --
      - We are the slashdot. Resistance is futile. Prepare to be moderated -
  21. driving games by jcsehak · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's true!

    Mushrooms make me drive a lot faster, just like in Mario Kart.

    --

    c-hack.com |
    1. Re:driving games by Graelin · · Score: 1

      Faster? Damn bro, what's the hurry? Life is too short, drive 30.. Enjoy nature.

      (15 Minutes later)

      "John, I am one with my car."

      ...sigh... The good ol' days.

    2. Re:driving games by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      sir, please setp away from the vehicle.

    3. Re:driving games by RKloti · · Score: 1

      Sir, please step away from the keyboard. At least until you learn to spell.

    4. Re:driving games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is obviously a typing error, not a spelling error

  22. PHP-Nuke Club by MoThugz · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Other than the club, PHP-Nuke also has a donation link as well as an Amazon wishlist for Mr. Burzi (developer for PHP-Nuke). The club contains priviledged downloads for unreleased (beta and alpha codes) versions of PHP-Nuke. Members also get to download released versions five days earlier than non-members.

    Although the club is a good idea, I prefer the donation method... or maybe Mr. Burzi could create some PHP-Nuke merchandise such as mugs, t-shirts or caps and sell them on the site. It's nice to have material things to cherish as mementos for the support you gave.

    1. Re:PHP-Nuke Club by baldass_newbie · · Score: 1

      PHP-Nuke, also has a similar page/system for their friends. It's a Club (MandrakeClub like) where you can be a member for a little monthly fee and you can get some extra benefits.

      I thought FB was/is doing away with the club. He didn't get enough response to it and was considering going down other avenues. If the site was up, I'd link to his posting on phpNuke.

      --
      The opposite of progress is congress
    2. Re:PHP-Nuke Club by nathanm · · Score: 2
      You seem to know something about PHP-Nuke, so maybe you can you answer this question. What's with this incredibly bold, unsubstantiated claim in the original story:
      ... the most used GPL'd software for the Web...
      First, it would be almost impossible to prove. Second, PHP-Nuke isn't used on any sites I regularly visit, but several of its workalikes are. Finally, although I've checked it out & know what it is, I'd bet 99.9% of web users have never heard of it.
    3. Re:PHP-Nuke Club by snillfisk · · Score: 1

      The merchandise-idea is neat, but it causes a new problem; If you're going to be selling stuff, you'll probably end up having to register a company, registering for taxes, paying taxes (hopefully, if you sell anything ;) .. and thats a lot more work than just a simple donation by an amazon wishlist (more of a grey thing) .. at least thats how i think it would be interpreted here in norway.

      --
      mats
      One man's ceiling is another man's floor.
    4. Re:PHP-Nuke Club by MoThugz · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yeah, maybe that is too bold a statement to make... but not entirely without basis IMHO. With this statement, I mean that it could possibly be the most used GPL'd software for Web portals.

      A quick search on Google for php portal returns PHP-Nuke as the top site.

      It also ranks quite high on the result list for GPL Web Portal Software on google.

      Suprisingly PHP-Nuke is also listed as the #1 site for Google's result for the search of God :)

    5. Re:PHP-Nuke Club by nathanm · · Score: 2

      That's still not much evidence. Your 2nd link has Post-Nuke as the first result.

      The third link is just plain strange! How did it get up there?

  23. The picking of nits by Brian+Goldman · · Score: 0
    This is from the OSNews KDE article:
    "I believe that the biggest problem in this dialog, and a bit laughable from a UI point of view, is the redundancy of the "Home Directory". In this dialog, it is accessible from three different locations as you can see from the screenshot."
    What's wrong with three Home buttons? Having important things in several locations is excellent design. To (roughly) quote Homer Simpson: "I want horns here, here, and here, because I can never find one when I'm mad. And they should all play La Cucaracha."
    1. Re:The picking of nits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >What's wrong with three Home buttons?

      It is redundant, dangerous for a newcomer and overly confusing. A good UI design, would not need more than 1 button/option. Plus, it bloats things up.

    2. Re:The picking of nits by King+of+the+World · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It also makes me wonder if one home button is different to another.

    3. Re:The picking of nits by pavera · · Score: 1

      Of course, basing UI design on something Homer Simpson said is a little questionalbe if you ask me!
      What music would you suggest all of these buttons play in KDE?

  24. Driving... by thelinuxking · · Score: 2, Funny

    This article is so true! Even though I don't have my license yet, all that time playing Crazy Taxi will finally pay off!

  25. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well it doesn't apply where I live because our cops drive different cars, aren't armed, wear different uniforms and drive on the other side of the road.

    Oh yeah, you can't just go into a store a buy a pistol either. I'd be FAR more worried about pages on the internet that tell you how to make bombs. The killing sprees are actually done with humour.

    The parents actually got the game for the kids, disregarding its R18 rating.

    Banning it won't help anyway - I got my GTA3 off Kazaa....

  26. As found on Google: by datastew · · Score: 4, Informative
    Its a fax number for a printer-supplies co. that spammed someone named jeffrey back in Feb. 2002.
    The google search

    The top google link

    Jeffrey's notes on spammers that he has toll-free numbers listed for.

    You're right, I still don't see the connection. Maybe timothy is trying for a fax slashdotting.

    1. Re:As found on Google: by fumble · · Score: 1

      Heh, A fax spam that's advertising ink. Reminds me of a Far Side cartoon that goes something like this:

      A brick is thrown through a window at a house. It has a note wrapped around it. The owner of the house reads the note: "Bricks thrown through your window? Call Andy's Glass!"

  27. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by jcsehak · · Score: 2

    I have never lurked around dark tunnels running from ghosts and eating pills I find on the ground.

    Yeah, but you're not Robert Downey Jr.

    I think I saw this as someone's sig:
    "If video games affected real life, we'd all be going around popping pills and listening to repetetive music."

    --

    c-hack.com |
  28. But they already do... by marm · · Score: 4, Informative

    I would hope that in the future developers would start putting a small description of their program within the About menu item.

    Ummm, have you actually used KDE or are you simply pontificating pointlessly?

    Open Konqueror. Go to Help->About Konqueror. In the about box that pops up, on the default 'About' tab, it says: 'Web browser, file manager, ...' which sums up pretty well what Konq does.

    Similarly, in the same place in KMail: 'The KDE Email client'.

    Or in Kate: 'Kate - KDE Advanced Text Editor'.

    Or in KSirc: 'KDE Irc Client'.

    Or in Konsole: 'X terminal for use with KDE.'

    Pretty much every KDE program has exactly this. You get the about dialog for free when you use the KDE framework, and all the developer has to do is fill in a few blanks.

    Not to mention, of course, that the app gets a description in the K Menu as well - for instance, KMail's entry looks like:
    KMail (Mail Client)

    Perhaps GNOME doesn't do these things, I can't tell you (I haven't had GNOME 1.4 installed for about a year and GNOME 2.0 was installed for a total of about an hour whilst I checked it out and decided I didn't like it) but as far as KDE is concerned, you're dead wrong.

    1. Re:But they already do... by FattMattP · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I am pontificating but not pointlessly. You assume that I'm talking about KDE in particular and therefore missed my point. KDE does now have short descriptions but it didn't when I first started to use it. GNOME didn't have these either. There are still many GUI based programs that are not KDE- or GNOME-based that don't provide a summary of what they do.

      Also, something as brief as "KDE Advanced Text Editor" may be enough to describe a text editor but it's still rather skimpy on the details. As another poster pointed out, it would help to have some more detail so that the end user could make a better decision about which program to use.

      An example of a better description for Kate:

      Kate is a multi document editor, based on a rewritten version of the kwrite editing widget of KDE, offering all the features of that plus a bunch of its own including unicode support, syntax highlighting, and a plugin interface.
      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    2. Re:But they already do... by damiam · · Score: 1

      GNOME does this, versions 1.4 and 2.0.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    3. Re:But they already do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK...now you can ask:

      - what's a "multi document"? Is that many different types of document or many documents at once? What types?
      - what did "kwrite" do?
      - what's a "widget"?
      - what's unicode support and why do I care?
      - a "plugin" interface? What, exactly, plugs in to what?

      You get the point: any description is too little detail for someone. Read the manual, don't expect a 4000 word philosophical essay on a piece of software in the "About" box, which is traditionally used to list the developers names and the copyright information.

    4. Re:But they already do... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1


      Why would I, the end user, care which editing widget Kate was built on? Would I even want to know what a widget is?

  29. While Your're generous by asv108 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can you please donate to my charity.

    1. Re:While Your're generous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like you have a long way to go.

    2. Re:While Your're generous by Bishop · · Score: 2

      The scary part is that if you start spamming your link everywhere you will get donations.

    3. Re:While Your're generous by jred · · Score: 2

      You know, I read Bishop's comment first & I was *still* tempted to give you a dollar...

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    4. Re:While Your're generous by jimbolaya · · Score: 2, Funny

      You know what? I think I will donate! Let me just grab a credit card number off the Swingline site...

      --

      There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

  30. Yeah, no murders ever before video games. by Blaede · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wish we could go back to era before Pong came out. No one ever murdered anyone. Drugs, crime, nothing like that ever existed. It was Utopia. Then that dreaded Pong arrived. Damn you, Nolan Bushnell!

    1. Re:Yeah, no murders ever before video games. by duckpoopy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Pong is still a gateway game. After Pong I started playing table tennis. Thank god my parents intervened after I experimented with raquetball.

      --
      word.
    2. Re:Yeah, no murders ever before video games. by pyrrho · · Score: 1


      and puss filled vesicles are great because they don't actually give you small pox, they just result from it...!

      Overt and thorough violence in video games is the sign of a sick society. The violence is coming into the games from the real (very violent) world, not the other way around.

      But see, that is a connection, there is a relation.

      --

      -pyrrho

    3. Re:Yeah, no murders ever before video games. by istartedi · · Score: 2

      OK, maybe there is a connection, but you don't cure smallpox by forcing people to get plastic surgery to hide the vesicles.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  31. Smartfilter categories by doublem · · Score: 2, Funny

    Uhm... NO categories for most of the web sites I visit. Nothing about technology sites, hardware reviews, computer programming...

    I half expected to see Tom's Hardware listed as a porn site.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    1. Re:Smartfilter categories by sharkey · · Score: 2

      I half expected to see Tom's Hardware listed as a porn site.

      Ad
      [Next Page]--> Click
      Whoring
      [Next Page]--> Click
      Is
      [Next Page]--> Click
      Not
      [Next Page]--> Click
      Pornograhpy


      Well,
      [Next Page]--> Click
      It's
      [Next Page]--> Click
      Not
      [Next Page]--> Click
      Satisfying
      [Next Page]--> Click
      To
      [Next Page]--> Click
      Me
      [Next Page]--> Click
      When
      [Next Page]--> Click
      I
      [Next Page]--> Click
      View
      [Next Page]--> Click
      It

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  32. Video game plauers as better drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Considering that I'm continually amazed that the drivers I see do some really stupid things are actually of the same species that put a man on the moon, there's no reason why video games can't both decrease brain activity and make one a better driver.

    It's not like your consciousness is involved in doing integral calculus just to drive a car...

  33. NPR Review of Grand Theft Auto III by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    It's interesting that the mainstream TV review was all about hysteria.

    I heard a reviewer on NPR talk about the game and he was talking about how immersive and fun it was.

    Just remember, with Network TV, the Product is YOU.

    Anon

  34. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  35. not on my mac...check this out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously..not worth explaining...everyone here lately seems so mac-hostile..but it's definitely more logical in OXS....functions are grouped logically w/most often used (generally) on the left, proceeding to the least often used on the right

    1. Re:not on my mac...check this out by shepd · · Score: 1

      >functions are grouped logically w/most often used (generally) on the left, proceeding to the least often used on the right

      This way often used options move away from your natural mouse movement, messing up your rhythm of using the program.

      Great... That's about as good as telling everyone who drives on the road the most to drive on the inside lane, and the people who use the road the least to drive on the outside lane.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  36. Arrested. by phriedom · · Score: 3, Informative

    Umm...not that it is actually important to your point, but unless you are foolish or unlucky, you very rarely get caught by the police in GTA3. You can jack a car right in front of a cop, and he will chase you for about 30 seconds, but then stop if you don't commit any more crimes (like running over pedestrians) along the way. But run over a cop or shoot one, and you better make a quick run to the pay'n'spray to get your car repainted so they cops won't recognize you. The cops seem to get pretty upset about any grenade use too, though molotov cocktails are fine. When you get arrested, you lose some money, your weapons, and your car to bribe your way out. On one mission, a bad cop pays you to kill a stoolie in the witness protection program. All of which I use to illustrate that there are no good guys in GTA3. Its just a game.

    So I agree with you, games don't cause social ills. If a parent doesn't want their 13 old playing GTA3, and I wouldn't, then don't let them play. Parents are legally responsible for their 13 year olds.

    --
    Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
    1. Re:Arrested. by hazyshadeofwinter · · Score: 1

      Granted, my GTA3 experience is limited to about five minutes fiddling with an in-store demo, but the *civillians* in that game don't take sh*t lying down. I wound up ending my session by carjacking someone, running the car into a light post, having the original driver yank me outta the car & start beating me, and after it turned into a huge enough brawl, some wacko wasted me with a shotgun... Needless to say, I'm off to try this in real life now. What Fun!

      --
      Click here if you just like to click on shit.
  37. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by jheinen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I guess I find it scary that you learn *any* moral lessons from a game. That you would come to the conclusion that you shouldn't get into a car chase with cops based on the outcome of a game is, well, disturbing. I would hope that you wouldn't engage in criminal activities because such activities are wrong, rather than because a game led you to believe that it's hard to outrun the cops. let me ask you this; if it had been easy to outrun the cops in GTA, would you have had a different opinion on ramming cop cars? God I hope not. Games aren't reality. I always assumed that people who played games realized this intrinsically, and could easily seperate fantasy from reality. Based on your post however, maybe I'm wrong. You seem to be applying information gleaned from a game to real-life situations. Please tell me I'm wrong.

    --
    -Vercingetorix
    "Necessitas non habet legem." -St. Augustine
  38. HA! by j0nkatz · · Score: 0, Troll

    his could possibly rate video game players as better drivers.

    Then I can say for a fact that hardly ANYONE in Memphis plays video games!

    --
    Don't mod me, bro'!!!!
  39. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by laserjet · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Oh, shut up you mamby pamby troll. You need to learn to at least troll better before you come to slashdot.

    --
    Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  40. The thing I find most interesting... by ArchAngelQ · · Score: 1, Informative

    about these silly studies is that, they generally don't go into much detail about what type of video games that the people in the study tend to play. Are you telling me that 3 years of playing sports games for 6 hours a day is the same as 3 years of playing 6 hours of actions games a day is the same as 3 years of playing 6 hours of rpgs a day? As a gamer, I somehow think it's rather insulting that it gets overgeneralized as such, into simply, 'video games kill kids brains' and not, boring, repetative tasks that require no brain power turns kids brains into putty. On the other hand, I'd argue that, stratagy (both kinds, tbs and rts), rpg, and puzzle games all help to stimulate problem solving skills in various ways. Ah well, just my 2p

  41. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by Telecommando · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah!

    We need to stop letting our kids play these unrealistic, mind warping games. None of that escapism stuff for us, no sirree.

    What we need are REALISTIC games! Games that teach kids a thing or two. Games like these:

    "Looking for a Parking Space" Where you drive endlessly around and around the parking lot looking for a space only to have the stores close before you can get there.

    Or how about "Traffic Jam"? Sit behind the wheel, inching forward at a snail's pace while watching your engine temperature rise. Will you make it home before the engine overheats? Wheel gripping inaction!

    Or you could always play "Road Construction Ahead". Try to pick the correct lane to be in only to have it suddenly come to a halt once you get into it. Grit your teeth as idiots try to squeese in ahead of you. It's frustration for the whole family!

    If those sound too exciting for you there's always,

    "Balancing Your Checkbook" Spend endless hours trying to read scrawled figures and cryptic bank statements in an attempt to see if there's still enough money left at the end of the month for pizza, or will it be ramen again tonight?

    Now those are some happening games, man!

    Excuse me, I gotta get coding. I'm gonna be RICH!

    --
    Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
  42. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by Hack+Shoeboy · · Score: 0

    You know what? I won't ram a cop either, because it's wrong. Are we still allowed to say that in this country?

    --

    IN TEH FUCHAR, LITERSY WLIL EB OPSHANAL!!!!!111
  43. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by macdaddy · · Score: 5, Informative
    The game isn't to blame. The parents of those 4 13 year olds are to blame. Do you want to prohibit rated R movies too because some damned parent is too lazy to keep tabs on their kids. Why don't we outlaw alcohol and cigarettes because some 16 year old junkie is working behind the counter a your local 7-11 and is selling kids the goods without checking their IDs? Might as well. Oh, and lets outlaw automobiles too because some minor stole a car and drove it into a tree. Might as well. You seem to think that parents aren't responsible for their kids. You're wrong there. That's why they are call "adults". That's why they are called "Mom" and "Dad". They are responsible for their children's actions because they are adults and know better.

    I hope you never have children.

  44. Well, by Bri3D · · Score: 1

    it's not very easy to access the php-nuke site when it' s down: [Mozilla]: The connection was refused when attempting to contact phpnuke.org. Or maybe it's MoThugz's link?

  45. Ocult seems more appropriate (NP) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There once was a little man named Frank who needed to get past the lameness filter so that he could post his little one-liner message. And so he told a little story about a man named Frank, to fill the time and space.

  46. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by OldMiner · · Score: 1
    Video games have yet to affect my real life at all (other then reducing the amount of time I spend there). If you don't want your kids to play these games don't let them. Do not turn to society as a whole to police what your kids can do.

    As mentioned by the parent (now, long since modded into oblivion), the issue of violent video games was covered this Wednesday on Nightline, and a partial write up can be read here.

    Now, the coverage was obviously presented with a slant against video games. A similar slant was shown in a previous story they did about the big business of pornography. Nightline's often not about presenting an unbiased opinion.

    Just the same, the most salient point probably made on the show, by a doctor of psychology I believe (correct me if I'm wrong), was that video games are akin to cigarettes in a sense. Most people who smoke don't wind up dying from lung cancer. Most people who play GTA3 also don't drive over pedestrians to get some midday stress relief.

    The point here is perhaps that the true effect of these games, especially those which people use to "let out their anger", has not really been carefully studied. And, it has been seen that expressing anger tends to cause an increase in one's liklihood to be angry, not a decrease.

    Despite the unwillingness of most game players to accept it, myself and a good deal of the Slashdot crowd included, it is possible that violent video games may have a subtle, but definite effect on a statistical significant amount of people. As it is, however, the current video game rating system should be sufficient to warn intelligent players and parents about games which may be inappropriate.

    --
    You like splinters in your crotch? -Jon Caldara
  47. The Red Swingline Stapler...not at that price! by MsGeek · · Score: 2

    $28? No way!

    I'll stay with my burgundy Swingline stapler, thank you very much.

    Besides, the damn thing does NOT look like the one in "Office Space." It's just...wrong.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:The Red Swingline Stapler...not at that price! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, SureSource was only selling the 'tapler for about $16, IIRC. Unfortunately, there's a good chance that patronizing their website would cost you a good deal more than that... see #3868929 in this thread.

  48. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    Um yah, thanks for twisting my point around to imply that I don't know right from wrong. I was arguing against the notion that kids will play these games and grow up thinking it's okay to ram Cop cars. I was saying that playing the game has the opposite effect.

    I appreciate your attempt to make me look like an idiot. It allowed me to write the one line summary for those people who, like you just did, try to draw exteme conclusions about people. Funny thing is, a little applied logic would have negated your comment. "If he thought it was fun to ram cop cars before GTA3, why isn't he in jail now?" *eyeroll*

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  49. Plane problems by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1) Evacuation - people are on average much further from the edge of the plane. This probably isn't too big an issue - people already often have to go quite a way along the airplane to get to the closest exit.

    2) Cargo - the constant cross-section of cylindrical planes means you can have standard size cargo pallets that fit anywhere in the plane. This plane has a much less regular shape. Perhaps they have sufficient volume they can afford to waste some.

    3) Engine maintenance. The engines on this plane are very high and hard to access from the ground. This is already the case for the number 2 engines of DC-10, MD-11 and L1011's, so there is prior experience in handling this, but it will add to maintenence cost.

    4) Manufacturing cost. In a constant cross-section fusilage, many panels, ribs etc. can be used many times over.

    5) Difficulty in adjusting size. You can stretch or (rarely) shrink the length of a cylindrical fusilage fairly easily.

    Of course, you can accept quite a few negatives in return for a 30% gain in economy.

    Finally, there is the risk of the unexpected - revolutionary designs frequently stumble over unexpected problems that take a while to iron out - e.g. Comet (metal fatigue in presurized airframe), high tail planes like the DC 9 ('deep stall'), A320 (human/computer interface problems).

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    1. Re:Plane problems by Quila · · Score: 2

      But the big question is, does it fit in a standard hangar?

    2. Re:Plane problems by underpaid · · Score: 1

      I think the biggest problem is that only 1/15th of the people on the plane are on a window seat, and about half can't even see a window. People need windows to help them feel balanced. I hope this plane comes with a lot of airsick bags. Not to mention the loading time for a plane that carries so many people.

  50. viewing source is dangerous to your mental health by Erris · · Score: 5, Funny
    I'm just dying at this silly page, where the sure source dopes think people want to steal their "photos and art". Who realy wants to publish pictures of Todd, or the cubes he commands or of their building?!

    Have some respect, now, and don't be a pirate for the mighty security firm might come get you. Tee-heee! Oh wait, I'm not a news organization and I don't have their permision to download, or did I because they sent it to me when I requested without asking who I was? Did I violate their silly text telling me that the pictures are " for exclusive use by members of the news media. These items may not be downloaded or reproduced by other individuals or organizations without the express permission of SureSource."? Or did they realy mean that I should, "Please click on the desired image to enlarge & download." Don't forget to check out the purple warehouse here, a DEEEEEEEEEEEP DEVILISH LINK. Please click to enlarge! Please click to Download! Wheeee! Wizards of Web! Untitled Document Creators? What awsome d000ds they are! Function MM_JumpMenu seems to come from Dreamweaver, but I doubt that firm wants to take credit. Note, when making simple static pages use a text editor or something simple like Bluefish. When you want to make complicated Flash stuff, please don't. When you use a big giant flash making editor to design simple static pages, sigh, I give up. It was funny at first but the more I look into it the dumber it gets. I'm embarased for them.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  51. Thanks a ALOT!!! by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

    Thanks you mister smartsy pants. Now us s00per h4x0rs will 0wns your site! Please to tell us where you keep your spare house key! Thanxors!

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  52. Ah, the subtleties of slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Timothy writes of KDE: "You've got to admit it's getting better all the time."

    It sure sounds like a compliment, unless you know the next line of the song he's quoting: "It can't get no worse."

    So what seems an effusive compliment is actually quite the snide remark!

  53. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I just wanted to let you know that I appreciate your tactfulness even though it appears I disturbed you. Let me answer your last question first:

    "I always assumed that people who played games realized this intrinsically, and could easily seperate fantasy from reality. Based on your post however, maybe I'm wrong. You seem to be applying information gleaned from a game to real-life situations. Please tell me I'm wrong."

    Okay: You're wrong. The whole purpose to explaining my thoughts on it like I did was so the parent poster would realize that I know what I'm talking about. Any images of me fantasizing about ramming cop cars or sniping people's heads off you can just flush. As a matter of fact, you have indirectly touched onto why I am against censorship of video games.

    I have been exposed to nearly every kind of video gaming experience one can have. I've played Mortal Kombat and all the GTAs and so on, so I know what's really involved there. Based on the reactions of people that claim that video game violence causes violent behaviour, I should be a hoodlum.

    But I'm not. I'm 24 years old. I've already started my career. I've worked at the same job for 5 years. I have no criminal record. I've only had 1 speeding ticket in my life, and that was shortly after I got my car heh. Ive never had a parking ticket. Never done drugs. Never punched anybody. I don't even raise my voice. I'm a pretty well rounded person. Hopefuly you can see why it is extremely difficult for me to imagine that exposing children to violent video games results in harmful behaviour changes.

    I told my view of GTA 3 so the parent poster would understand that the more realistic video games are, the more likely a child would realize the consequences of what he or she does. I've heard arguments like "When a child plays a game like Quake, he/she learns it's okay and fun to run around and shoot people." In my experience, instead the child learns "Guns kill people."

    I think these anti-video-game types are looking at them in entirely the wrong way. In fact, I'm offended that they think kids are stupider than they really are. If you treat a child like they are incapable of making good decions, you're emotionally damaging the kid. I think saying "You're not allowed to play Mortal Kombat because it's too violent" is akin to saying "You're too stupid to know the difference between right and wrong. So I'm going to shelter you from anything that can give you ideas."

    I appreciate you asking me before drawing a conclusion about me, though. It seems to be a popular thing here on Slashdot for somebody to listen to what you say and then draw the most absurd, extreme conclusion they can come up with. It's sorta like this: "I love to eat hamburgers.... I can't believe you like to murder innocent animals!"

    I guess it's my own fault for not clarifying that I knew before playing the game that ramming cops was wrong. I kinda figured that'd be a default assumption that people'd make, heh. I didn't phrase it very well I suppose. Hopefully you'll understand why I didn't really worry too much about that.

    Cheers

    P.S. Again, I appreciate you asking before passing judgement. You have no idea how many times I've had people send me insulting messages because they came up with really bizzarre interpretations of my comments. You're a better human being than most I've run across here.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  54. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by ZxCv · · Score: 2

    Why would you want to phantasize about something you would not do in real life, again?

    Isn't that the whole point of "phantasizing"? It's really hard to get away with murdering your boss because he went that extra mile in being a jerk, but there's no crime (yet) in sitting down in front of a game of GTA3 or whatever and pretending that you're ripping him limb-from-limb. And if killing a few virtual people is enough to make someone forget about their boss and feel better, isn't that better than them taking out their anger in real life?

    --

    Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
  55. KDE3 suggestions had me till the end by mrroach · · Score: 1

    While reading the KDE article, I did not necessarily agree with every suggestion that the author made, but felt that they were all well supported right up until the end. She was even careful in parts to point out that some flaws were the fault of QT and not KDE, but then she decided to pontificate on the readiness of things like kernel drivers, plug n' play and compilation issues.

    I wish I could see one review/reccomendation that did not feel the need to either start off with a complaint about the difficulty of compiling from scratch/downloading sooo many RPM's or trail off in a rant about kernel development and such nonsense.

    Oh well, other than that though, an interesting piece.

  56. KDE and Linux by quasi_steller · · Score: 1

    I just got done looking at the screenshots of KDE 3.0 for the first time (don't know why I didn't look when they first came out, lazyness I guess). Wow! KDE has improved in looks a lot! It looked great before, but know it looks even smoother!

    I really do feel sorry for the guy who recently decited to switch back to windows. I mean really, what an exciting time to be involved in Linux! Two years ago when I first got involved in Linux, KDE and GNOME were fairly simple to use, although not as simple as windows. They booth looked ok as well. Boy things have improved a lot! At this rate, Linux could easily surpas windows in ease of use and asthetics.

    --
    ...interesting if true.
  57. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by pyrrho · · Score: 2

    yes, it's "better". But you only confirm with your example that the need stems from basic pent up slave-emotion.

    I mean, would it be better if such a boss was fired?

    When you play a game to expell a little of this sort of energy, the result is that you are then calmed, and thereby made the perfect victim, in real life, for that idiot boss to keep abusing! That's my point.

    --

    -pyrrho

  58. Construction paper by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    can be a bit thick..
    I usually just run a few pages out of the photocopier with the lid open.

  59. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by jheinen · · Score: 2

    "I have no criminal record. I've only had 1 speeding ticket in my life, and that was shortly after I got my car heh. Ive never had a parking ticket. Never done drugs. Never punched anybody. I don't even raise my voice."

    Well there you go. You're obviously a serial killer. You fit the profile perfectly. "Gee, he was always such a nice, quiet guy. Didn't bother anybody."

    Just kidding of course :)

    --
    -Vercingetorix
    "Necessitas non habet legem." -St. Augustine
  60. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by hagar� · · Score: 1

    Ok then. You are wrong. Hope this helps;-)

    --
    Insert something insightful here, or I'll insert something painful there.
  61. Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction? (tm) by shepd · · Score: 1

    >Timothy writes of KDE: "You've got to admit it's getting better all the time."

    Microsoft wrote of XP: "It's the best windows yet!"

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  62. Credit Card Info by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

    I just wanted to let anyone who happened to order from them know about this. Your credit card info could very well be compromised."

    And with Microsoft's history of security, the whole tying of Visa to Passport will be just as secure.

    1. Re:Credit Card Info by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
      Well, the SureSource site has a good security policy, too:
      • Although SureSource will use all reasonable efforts to safeguard the confidentiality of any visitor information collected, SureSource will have no liability for disclosure of any visitor information obtained due to errors in transmission or the unauthorized acts of third parties
      Good for them, I mean....sheesh

      I guess using unique keys to tie individual requests to query results is unreasonable.

      Why am I not surprised to see that SureSource uses ASP?

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  63. Bellvue, WA by Dr.Seuss · · Score: 1

    "...Your credit card info could very well be compromised."

    Shouldn't that be "I just wanted to let anyone in Bellvue, WA know your credit card information HAS been compromised..."?

  64. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by ZxCv · · Score: 2

    Haha, welcome to real life. Sure it would be "better" if the evil boss was just fired, but that's just not how it is in the real life. What are people supposed to do about an evil boss, other than find some peaceful, legal way to vent their anger? You could say the same thing about someone who goes and downs a cup of black coffee after an altercation with the boss in order to calm down. Coffee makes you the perfect victim! Good thing I don't drink coffee...

    --

    Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
  65. Swingline Java Code: Line Number 1978!! by 955301 · · Score: 1

    Wow so much for Object Oriented Programming!

    Excuse me, I... I believe you have my design patterns book... i'll burn down the website.

    500 Internal Server Error /b2c/ourproducts/OurProductsStaples.jsp:

    null java.lang.NullPointerException at jrun__ourproducts__OurProductsStaples2ejsp23._jspS ervice(jrun__ourproducts__OurProductsStaples2ejsp2 3.java:1978)
    at yada yada yada....

    --
    You are checking your backups, aren't you?
  66. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by istartedi · · Score: 1

    Excuse me, I gotta get coding. I'm gonna be RICH!

    You can probably save yourself a lot of time by licensing the engine from Deerhunter.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  67. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by jamesl · · Score: 1

    I've always thought Chess was a little over the top. All those Bishops and Knights running around killing each other.

  68. Re:Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction? (tm) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to the question in your sig: Yes

  69. Re:Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction? (tm) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Must... Increase... Number... In... Sig... To... 1250. Must... post... more... often! :-)

  70. PHPNuke and GPL Issues by crisco · · Score: 4, Informative
    Why contribute to PHPNuke when only a year ago they were considering abandoning the GPL because of petty personal differences.

    Why not support PostNuke, a fork of PHPNuke that has a much better attitude toward open source development and security.

    --

    Bleh!

  71. Swingline, Credit Cards, security by pavera · · Score: 2, Informative

    From reading the site, now that the link to actually purchase online is gone, it does not seem as if this is Swingline's fault as the poster states:

    "The company who apparently provides the online shopping service for Swingline appears to be an outfit called SureSource."

    Whereas the site clearly states:

    " * Please note that you will be purchasing from SureSource, a distributor of Swingline products.
    To place an order for the Rio Red Stapler (SKU#: S7074740), Please call SureSource at: 1-800-544-3243."

    SureSource is simply a distributor, and as such, Swingline would have about as much control over their e-commerce site as I do over the weather.

    1. Re:Swingline, Credit Cards, security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Thank you for the fun... You have been Goatse.cx'd...

      Have fun fucking a goat.

  72. A distro built around KDE? by io333 · · Score: 1

    One of the comments to the KDE3 article (on the article's page) said this:

    "Would it be too much to ask for a Linux distro made specifically for KDE so that it may be optimized for KDE and really integrate KDE into the underlying system?"

    Wow! Is this an original thought? I can't believe I never thought of that myself. I'd sure as heck give a such a distro a try on *my* desktop. I know so many folks prefer other desktops, and for good reasons, but if a standardized desktop (forced on the community because the KDE distribution overwhelmingly becomes *the* distro that all non-sysadmins use) that most apps were (in the long run) coded towards; that finally allowed me to cut and paste between apps (like the mac has been able to do for 18 years) would finally enable me to dump windows forever.

    [Aside: I finally tracked down an OSX machine to check out the OS that so many /.ers have been raving about. Opinion: Yes, it's very nice. The nicest OS I've ever seen. But then I saw one of THESE and decided that when it comes to lugging a laptop around all day, weight is primary and OS choice is secondary. I'll be ordering one in a month. You have to see the little thing to believe it. It's unbelievably cute!]

    1. Re:A distro built around KDE? by Ella+the+Cat · · Score: 1

      Are you serious? Take a look at SuSE 8.0 if you want to see a good attempt at encouraging people to use KDE. I don't use KDE btw, I use fvwm2 with minimal everything and keybindings, but I respect SuSE for trying to make a desktop distro that works out of the box for ordinary folks.

  73. not so smart filter by mamba-mamba · · Score: 1

    Heh, it has 2600.net listed (crim.skills), but not 2600.com. (they both go to the same place)

    At a former employer the firewall blocked 2600.net, but allowed me to browse 2600.com. I wonder if there is a connection?

    MM
    --

    --
    By including this sig, the copyright holders of this work or collection unreservedly place it in the public domain.
  74. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by ukyoCE · · Score: 1

    Video games aren't "anger" any more than any other competion. Sports, Boy scouts, SCHOOL. Do we say "oh goodness, people might go crazy because they're competing with others for a goal"? Only if it happens to be a video game. What about paintball? Is paintball "harmful"? What about hunting - i'm sure they'd say hunting is even worse. In a video game it's all fake - teens are out there with REAL guns killing REAL life with them. But im clicking a mouse on some blob of pixels, and that's gonna fuck me up?

  75. Re:Never trust the results by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    unless it bothers to explain the study in detail.
    You remember that survey that said 90% of Americans flush the toilet before they stand up, right?
    Be sure that anyone spouting knows to check the survey as well as the results.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  76. Brain Activity by jeti · · Score: 2

    I have to check what exactly was tested.
    But if the brain is very active, it only
    shows that the person is thinking very
    hard.
    In other words the easier it is for you
    to complete a task, the less active is
    your brain.

  77. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by Credne · · Score: 1

    So you would prefer a game that was true to your life? Why bother playing a game at all, go live your life it'll be just like the game. Games by definition (activity engaged in for diversion or amusement) are escapist. If your Nietzschean beliefs dislike escapism then you need have no concern of the content of games.

  78. Re:Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction? (tm) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    wow - 1237 as I write this. I'm impressed. I even had a about a week or two headstart (based on your uid and my guessing as to how many people were registering back in 1999).

    We're sick, you realize. Oh, and anonymous posts aren't counted, so, who knows what the real number is...

  79. Quitting form the File menu by LippyTheLip · · Score: 1

    In Mac OS X, the quit command is on a separate menu, which has the title of the program being used. For example, Internet Explorer v5.2 has a menu titled Explorer adn the menu items are: About IE, License Agreement, Preferences, Services (accesses OS-level functions like screen shots, etc.), Hide Explorer, Hide Others, Show All, and Quit Explorer. In general, I like the idea of having a separate menu that issues commands to the OS and controls the behavior of the program in relation to other programs and the OS, rather than subsuming these behivors into other menus that are used to issue commands to the program.

  80. I had the same problem with CDNOW. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had the same problem with CDNOW. Luckily it was my boss who caught it. I told CDNOW, but never heard back from them.

  81. Re: your .sig by Hellkitten · · Score: 1

    I used to have a cool sig but people replied to it more than they did my comments.

    Can I have your old .sig please?

    --
    - We are the slashdot. Resistance is futile. Prepare to be moderated -
  82. OSNews article by MullerMn · · Score: 1

    I've just read the OSNews article on KDE3.1. The article isn't too bad, though much of the criticisms the author levels are things that I would classify as personal preference and not really fundamental design issues.

    What really surprised me about that article was the user comments afterwards! The level of ignorance and arrogance shown by some of the users of the OSNews site is staggering and makes an average /. comment seem well balanced and informed by comparison.

    They seem to have definitely had more than their quota of do-what-*I*-like users.. you know the kind; they never actually contribute to any project, not even so much as a bug report, yet they demand that all the developers should drop what they're doing and make the 'improvements' they suggest, which normally boil down to 'make it like whatever I'm already using, because I'm too lazy to learn something new!'.

    I especially like this comment. It's another one of those X-is-crap(for reasons I'm not too sure about)-and-someone-should -do-something-better(though not me, obviously, because I know fuck all about what I'm talking about) comments. I'm not saying that X shouldn't be superceeded some day, but people that keep repeating this should really take the time to find out just how big and powerful(thus complex) X is, and maybe ask themselves why a community of so many good programmers has not replaced it, if it's such a simple and desirable thing to do?

    Here's to Linux forging it's own path, and not trying to emulate everything that's already out there.

    Incidentally, I'm a FVWM2 user, so I don't support either KDE or Gnome more than the other.

  83. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by xenyz · · Score: 1

    . Will you make it home before the engine overheats? Wheel gripping inaction!

    I managed to cover myself in rasin bran while laughing my ass off at this sentence. Thanks

  84. About is ok, but why the bloody K? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not limited to KDE of course, but why must all KDE apps have a name starting with a K? It isn't 'kool', or 'klever', or even 'kuseful'.

    Do you ever see Windows applications that are called 'W-whatever'? Why, then, should all X-applications be called 'X-something', or KDE-applications 'K-something'?

    Just to be sure, this is not a call for even worse fantasy names than we already have. I am perfectly satisfied with application names that describe the function of the application; for example, 'E-mail' is, as far as I care, the ultimate name for an e-mail application.

  85. Ummmm..... by ziggy_zero · · Score: 1


    "this could possibly rate video game players as better drivers"

    Highly dubious. I play video games all the time (and I'm pretty damn good at it too) and I've gotten in 3 accidents and gotten 2 speeding tickets. I'm 17. One of my accidents was running into a bus full of cheerleaders, btw.

    --
    I belong to the ______ generation.
    1. Re:Ummmm..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes me wonder what type of games you play... Gran Turismo, GTA3, N4S?

    2. Re:Ummmm..... by kraig · · Score: 1

      http://www.datanation.com/fallacies/hasty.htm

      and that's all I've got to say about that.

    3. Re:Ummmm..... by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 2
      I play video games all the time (and I'm pretty damn good at it too) and I've gotten in 3 accidents and gotten 2 speeding tickets. I'm 17.
      I think being 17 trumps the video game factor. Who here was a good driver at 17? Granted, most of us weren't as bad as you but I don't think it's the fault of the video games.

      How do you still have your license? Seriously - three accidents and you've had your license for less than two years? And what police officer wouldn't have had your license revoked after the second ticket, at only 17? Even after hitting a school bus??

      Either you're lying, your parents are wealthy, or your local law enforcement is corrupt/incompetent. But if I was as bad a driver as you, I wouldn't tell anyone about it and I'd spend most of my free time bui

      --
      I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
  86. These people know it isn't simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They know it isn't simple to replace X, they just think it should be done. And it should be. I agree with what alot of that comment you linked said, but it is alot of repitition of what ALWAYS comes up in such debates. Hell, I switched back to windows too (win98) recently, and I'm really not bothered by it (I used freebsd for two years). It actually doesn't crash as often as I remember it.

  87. But that's no fun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Running from the police isn't fun unless:

    1) You have the helicopter (three stars).
    2) You don't pick up the bribes or go to the paint n' spray.

    What's really good is when you get 5 stars and the FBI appears. Those guys are absolutely insane.

  88. Freedom of Speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    >However, the only long term solution is to follow the more enlightened policies of some European countries and ban this sort of trash outright.

    Um, isn't that a limit on freedom of speech? The same freedom of speech that you wish to use to express your "alternative" view?

    I hate censorship via banning. It's really stupid in my opinion. Rating systems that can be bypassed via parental permission I think are good. The movie rating system I think works alright. I think video game ratings should work in a similar way and the industry should voluntarily self regulate.

  89. WinZip? Winamp? by marm · · Score: 2

    ...why must all KDE apps have a name starting with a K?

    Do you ever see Windows applications that are called 'W-whatever'?

    No, but there's plenty of Windows software that has a name containing 'Win'.

    For example:

    WinZip
    Winamp
    WinAce
    WinRAR
    WinDVD
    CDRWin
    WinDoctor
    WinDAC
    WinPopUp
    WinRoute
    WinMX
    CygWin

    These are just a few off the top of my head, there's plenty more. The Mac has (or had, at least) its fair share too, e.g. MacPaint, MacDraw, MacWrite, MacAMP/Macast.

    You see, it's just a way of associating the program with the environment where it runs. The fact that KDE app developers love to associate their apps with KDE via the name suggests to me that they generally think very highly of KDE. Call it 'platform patriotism', if you will. End-users like it because it sounds like the app is specifically designed for the environment and follows the same style guidelines and conventions. Never underestimate the power of a name.

    Why do you think WinZip became the dominant zip archiver on Windows? I'm pretty sure it wasn't the first, it doesn't come from the people who invented the zip format, it isn't free like some Windows zip archivers (nasty nagware) and I don't think it has the best user interface either (although that's arguable).

    In short, it's just good marketing for an app, and that matters as much to free software authors as it does to commercial developers.

  90. Re:Shopping Cart - get money back by jaapD · · Score: 1

    You can even order negative amounts of staplers. link

  91. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by NewStarRising · · Score: 1

    "I have been exposed to nearly every kind of video gaming experience one can have. I've played Mortal Kombat and all the GTAs and so on, so I know what's really involved there. Based on the reactions of people that claim that video game violence causes violent behaviour, I should be a hoodlum." My Grandfather smoked 40 cigarettes a day, from age 11. By these crazy scientists reckoning, her should have died of lung cancer aged 45. Actually, he livec to be 80. ANYONE can use ONE example to try to disprove a point (Espescially oner saying "I am not affected by these things)> Have you heard of 'trends', 'tendencies', 'increased chances' etc??

    --
    b3 4phr41d 0f my 4bov3-4v3r4g3 c0mpu73r kn0wI3dg3!
    MadDwarf
  92. Re:can crushing by HomeGroove · · Score: 1

    This wouldn't work. I remember these at Trader Joes (what a kick ass store) in Brookline, MA (see also Stah Mah-ket and Stop & Shop). You have to close the door in order to activate the scanner. It spins the can (or bottle) around until it's able to read the UPC. So, stick no workie because you have to shut the door. And even if you got the door shut with your stick in there, you'd be screwed and stickless.

    --

    ----
    Spam subject of the moment: Offshore account secrets -nashville disrupt

  93. If Lungburg worked for Swingline? by KUHurdler · · Score: 1

    Umm, Yeah SureSource? We're gonna need you to go ahead and come in on Saturday, m-kay?

    --
    Fix Your Own TV - RiddledTV.com Avoid the Landfill
  94. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "But im clicking a mouse on some blob of pixels, and that's gonna fuck me up?"

    Well, something obviously has.

  95. 1000 Points by jdevons · · Score: 1

    Wow! Running into a bus full of cheerleaders is good for a thousand points!

    --
    I do everything the voices in my head tell me to...
  96. Re:WinZip? Winamp? by Pxtl · · Score: 2

    Not to mention how most MS apps earn an MS prefix when you talk about them.

  97. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by devnull17 · · Score: 1

    There were times when I'd hop in my car after playing that game and I'd have to consciously remind myself that I was not supposed to hit things. Scary, indeed.

  98. Re:viewing source is dangerous to your mental heal by superflippy · · Score: 1

    How funny! To be fair, they probably didn't build their own site. They probably had someone who specializes in that sort of thing do it for them. I know, I used to work for a consulting company that built sites for Red Hat and ISS (not their current sites, this was a few years ago). Internet consulting co.'s (i.e. web design people) don't always apply the same standards to their own code that their clients do. Personally, I like to make sites I build valid and simple, but not every designer shares those values and some scoff at those who do.

    --
    Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
  99. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    err I wasn't making a definitive statement, I was showing them that I'm one of the kids that was exposed to the stuff that they're worried will affect kids. My point'd be flat if I never played games.

    The difference between your example and mine is that quite a few people have died from cigs, but there's little proof of any video game induced violence.

    Here is another line in my post I'd like you to pay careful attention to:

    "Hopefuly you can see why it is extremely difficult for me to imagine that exposing children to violent video games results in harmful behaviour changes."

    I wasn't using 'one example to disprove a point', I was explaining why I feel the way I do about it.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  100. Re:can crushing by Newander · · Score: 1

    At the Hy-Vee here in Ames, IA there are no doors, you just slide the can/bottle into a hole in the front of the machine.

    --

    Jesus saves and takes half damage.

  101. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by pyrrho · · Score: 1

    you could quit... or go ahead, play a video game to relieve your stress. But that doesn't make it a healthy situation. Sometimes an opiate is good. But it's also good to get to the root of problems, if you want a long term solution.

    These type of games are not the cause of a problem, but they sure as hell are the symptom of one. imho, of course.

    --

    -pyrrho

  102. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by pyrrho · · Score: 1

    no, I like games and fantasy that takes me as far from reality as possible. It's the violent blood fantasy that is, to me, wasted escapism. It's in response to stimula that could be better spent in activism against whatever is instilling the anger in the first place.

    It was said that Religion is the Opiate of the Masses. It just made the medievil European feel better about their oppression... how cruel to take it from them... but then, they are better off without it, imo. Better to face reality and address the problems. I wouldn't want to make these games illegal. But I would want to remove the illusion that it's sane and sensible and meaninglessly innocent play. It's a symptom of culture stress, of unsafe living environments, of hostile work conditions.

    --

    -pyrrho

  103. NPC Revenge by phriedom · · Score: 1

    "the *civillians* in that game don't take sh*t lying down"

    Yeah, I think the detail of the NPC behaviors, and its variety, is one of the high points of the game. If a car blows up, some pedestrians will run away screaming, some will run over to inspect the wreckage (and get taken out by secondary explosions.) Attack a gang member, and all the other gang members who witness it will come after you. Try carjacking a mafia member some time if you want some excitement. The funniest suprise to me was when I mugged a pedstrian and then was hanging around in the area looking for something. An ambulance came and the EMTs revived the guy on the ground. Then he got up and came after me, caught me totally off guard. I guess I didnt' expect an NPC to have a memory like that.

    --
    Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
  104. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by SixStars · · Score: 1

    You're forgetting about the deadbeat drunks that never say anything to their kids, or even care where they are or what they're doing.

  105. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by OldMiner · · Score: 1

    This is a rather late post that's likely of little value considering it's datedness. Just the same:

    Video games aren't "anger" any more than any other competion.

    Reread my post. I was saying games which people use to "let out their anger" are especially likely to have some sort of side effect. I was not labeling video games as violent. I'm quite aware that video games can be decidedly nonviolent, evidenced by such games as Pong or to a lesser extent, Captain Novolin. And as you say, a game of paintball might have the same potential negative effects as a violent video game. For instance, a fellow may callously shoot his buddy in the face after he's already been taken out to relieve some anger. That sort of 'relief' of anger is what breeds more anger over time.

    teens are out there with REAL guns killing REAL life with them

    That's exactly the point. Any activity that encourages one to directly express her anger can encourage the spiraling growth of anger. Violent video games, for some people, may very well encourage just this sort of behavior, which may ultimately push them that extra step towards shooting their classmates.

    --
    You like splinters in your crotch? -Jon Caldara
  106. Re:can crushing by brad3378 · · Score: 2

    > This wouldn't work. I remember these at Trader Joes [traderjoes.com] (what a kick ass store) in Brookline, MA (see also Stah Mah-ket and Stop & Shop). You have to close the door in order to activate the scanner. It spins the can (or bottle) around until it's able to read the UPC. So, stick no workie because you have to shut the door. And even if you got the door shut with your stick in there, you'd be screwed and stickless.

    We don't have doors on ours here in Michigan, but they probably use some sort of sensor to detect the can. Not sure what type (if any) since aluminum cans are not magnetic.

    --

  107. Re:Grand Theft Auto III by DrVxD · · Score: 2

    > they had a police officer on there describing how he felt while they showed the main character of the game beating on a cop
    Did they ask him to comment on the film of cops beating on Rodney King? Or did they manage to draw the distinction between entertainment and real life there?

    > It frightens me that we allow these sort of games to be played by our youth
    Grand Theft Auto III is clearly marked with an "18" certificate (at least, my copy is). If parents are allowing their kids to play it, then attack the parents - not the game. Or would you rather we banned all "18" cert movies? What else would you like to censor because certain individuals fail to exercise good judgement in raising their children?

    > games like this, Postal, and Doom may be all it takes to trigger a mass murderer.
    We had mass murders before computers (or TV) were invented. I really don't think we can blame mankind's inhumanity to itself on technology.

    > but the fact that there were four thirteen year olds on the show playing the game
    See my previous comment re: 18 certificate. The bad judgement is not in the making of the game, it is in allowing it to be viewed by an unsuitable audience. Again, the parents should take some responsibility rather than relying on an electronic babysitter.

    > we need to curb our liberties to guard our safety.
    No. You need to EXERCISE the liberty to stop your children playing those games which you feel are a negative influence in order to safeguard those liberties. If you place "safety" above liberty, presumably you wouldn't fight a war to preserve your liberty, since fighting a war is inherently unsafe? Wish we'd though of that when Hitler was threatening Europe.

    Either the moderation is right, and you are a troll. Or the moderations wrong and you're sadly misguided. I hope for all our sake's that you're a troll.

    --
    Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.