Slashdot Mirror


Resume Tips For Jobs

JerseyTom writes "SAGEWire reports that with the economy speeding up, more and more people are freshening up their resumés. They've printed an article by Tom Limoncelli, co-author of TPoSaNA, that offers specific advice for geeks writing resumes." 'Course, I'm not sure how much I believe the economy speeding up - but still good information.,

452 comments

  1. Don't... by squaretorus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1: Try and sound interesting in your Hobbies / Interests section, you'll just come across as a twat. Be honest. And DON'T mention Stanley Kubrick. Everyone does that!

    2: Go too far ahead in 'Career Objectives'. Think 2 or 3 years, not 10!

    3: Forget to spell check the thing.

    1. Re:Don't... by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      1: I'm not sure I agree with you. I would think that any prospective employer would be thrilled to know about my stamp collecting, model car building, awards for being a top notch bird caller, and my highly developed talent in the fine art of taxidermy. I think they would see that that makes a highly dynamic and professional person. But your right. My unhealthy infatuation with Stanley Kubrick might be a bit overboard.

      2. Yeah, I've made that mistake. Aparently "In 10 years I hope to be dating your daughter, forcing her to have childern and selling them to white slavery rings" is just too ambitious for a future boss on a resume. I've switched that to 'I hope to finally finish the original Zork in 2 years'.

      3. I'll try to remember.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    2. Re:Don't... by forged · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't overdo your resume either, or else you will look like a moron with absolutely no credibility...

    3. Re:Don't... by BlackMesaResearchFac · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Dont... 1: Try and sound interesting in your Hobbies / Interests section, you'll just come across as a twat. Be honest. And DON'T mention Stanley Kubrick. Everyone does that!

      I would agree, unless your hobbies/interests include computer related issues.

      This can be especially useful in interviews. In my experience, they like to hear about the wireless LAN you have at home running off a Linux box you built from scratch, etc.

      This tells them you're not just some 'tard that went to college and got a degree in computers because everyone lied to you and said there would be guys lined up with bags of money after you graduate. You actually have genuine interest...or so they'll think...

      --
      -- Scientist: You aren't going to leave me here, are you? Boagh! Thump...
    4. Re:Don't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But your right.

      4. Do not confuse "your" and "you're". Same for "there", "their" and "they're".

    5. Re:Don't... by Violet+Null · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would agree, unless your hobbies/interests include computer related issues.

      On the other hand...

      I have been told by headhunters that you should not put computer-related items in your hobbies, because it makes you look like a stereotypical geek, and turns prospective employers off unless they are also geeks (which is rare).

      Bottom line is, I don't think there's a right answer on this one. Go with what feels best to you.

    6. Re:Don't... by Blkdeath · · Score: 1
      1: Try and sound interesting in your Hobbies / Interests section, you'll just come across as a twat. Be honest. And DON'T mention Stanley Kubrick. Everyone does that!
      I'm not so sure I agree with that. I listed a few of my hobbies and interests (albeit not at the front of my resumee) and my last employer complimented me on them. I showed that I was interested in several other areas (music (listening and production), construction, mechanical interests, etc.) besides just computers. I'm not so sure that companies today want to hire geeks who have nothing better to do than tinker with their latest and greatest electronic toy. IOW, they want people with some semblence of a life.
      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    7. Re:Don't... by kubrick · · Score: 1

      And DON'T mention Stanley Kubrick. Everyone does that!

      Huh?

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    8. Re:Don't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And lose the loose losses.

    9. Re:Don't... by DJ_Goldfingerz · · Score: 1

      Dont... 1: Try and sound interesting in your Hobbies / Interests section, you'll just come across as a twat. Be honest. And DON'T mention Stanley Kubrick. Everyone does that! I would agree, unless your hobbies/interests include computer related issues. I disagree, if your hobbies includes sports or music (as in you play an instrument and not just listen) or learning sign language, I would definitely mention it. I mean as the employer, don't you want to get to know the employee. And as the employee don't you want to make sure they appreciate who you are? Otherwise, everyone will be disappointed. In my interviews, I'm always honest about my hobbies and I never miss an opportunity to talk about other thing then network administration. The same goes for when I hire people, I'm always curious to know what the person I'm trying hire does besides work. This way I KNOW they got a mind and life of their own, and not just a robot that was trained to give the perfect picture.

    10. Re:Don't... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      When I apply at ILM, my resume's gonna say: "Once bull's eye'd a target 2 meters wide without the aid of a computer."

    11. Re:Don't... by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > I have been told by headhunters that you should not put computer-related items in your hobbies, because it makes you look like a stereotypical geek, and turns prospective employers off unless they are also geeks (which is rare).

      That's a feature, not a bug.

      Your headhunter wants to get you hired anywhere, so he can collect his cut of the loot.

      You what to be hired somewhere you'll want to stay, which ain't necessarily the first company with an offer.

    12. Re:Don't... by tc · · Score: 1
      I'm not so sure. Working for a geek might not be the place you want to stay. Working for a good manager is where I want to be. Such a person might or might not be a geek (many geeks make truly woeful managers, because they're too wrapped up in technology to give a rip about things like people skills and helping folks plan their careers).

      Also, although in the short term, your headhunter just wants to place you somewhere, in the long term a smart headhunter wants to take care of their reputation. If they get a reputation for placing people in the wrong jobs, pretty soon they won't get used any more. It's also quite usual for the headhunter to only get paid if you stay for, say, a year.

    13. Re:Don't... by BlackMesaResearchFac · · Score: 1
      Yes, if your hobbies include things that you can boast actual accomplishments about (did well at a certain sport, learning sign language is an accomplishment in itself, knowing how to play an instrument) then you have something to talk about. Those show committment to a skill/task and go towards proving your character and worth as an employee.

      On the other hand, boasting about your Star Wars/Trek memorabilia collection or your Wayne Gretzky rookie cards isn't necessarily going to get you anywhere (sure there is "committment" involved but not exactly the kind that woos employeers). Not that you should lie if asked in an interview, but since I don't think it really helps (i.e. just takes up space better used for something else), I wouldn't volunteer it on my resume.

      I combine my love of hockey (hobby) with the fact that I host/run my own site and am Assistant Commish of an online fantasy hockey league. I'm the webmaster and do other tasks/responsibilities such as interview and hire new GMs.

      Of course I feel the need to temper that, especially if spoken about during the interview, by adding in with a few "real world" activities (e.g. season ticket holder) in order to make sure they don't think I just spend 24/7 on the computer.

      It all depends on what sort of job you're interviewing for, as well as your ability to impress them with your communication skills. IMO, if you communicate well during the interview, they care a lotless if your resume reeks of "nerd."

      Although obviously you still have to get the interview :)

      --
      -- Scientist: You aren't going to leave me here, are you? Boagh! Thump...
    14. Re:Don't... by Mastoid · · Score: 1
      1: (...) But your right. (...)

      3. I'll try to remember.

      Too late.

      --
      I had an argument...with the person here at the university that teaches OS design. I wonder when I'll learn --Linus
    15. Re:Don't... by Xenographic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1: Try and sound interesting in your Hobbies / Interests section, you'll just come across as a twat. Be honest. And DON'T mention Stanley Kubrick. Everyone does that!
      >>>>>

      This only applies in Europe. American résumés are considerably different (something both Americans & Europeans need to keep in mind when reading web-based tips!) -- we do NOT put anything about our hobbies on our résumés (nor should we include pictures of ourselves, for that matter; there are anti-discrimination laws to think about). Also, some professions prefer to see porfolios of prior work (it's not a bad thing to have, even for coders...) -- basically, you have to know what the employer you're going after expects, then give it to them.

      Actually, there are lots of factors to consider. If you're at a university right now, check with them--they should have a department called "Career Services" or something like that. USE IT! They've helped me a LOT; I wouldn't have half as many job leads right now if not for them...

    16. Re:Don't... by nigelc · · Score: 1
      I would think that any prospective employer would be thrilled to know about my stamp collecting

      No! As the saying goes, "Philately will get you nowhere"

      --


      Cthulhu Barata Nikto
    17. Re:Don't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit, I actually received this resume about 4 months ago. I own a one man hosting company and actually thought this was interesting.

    18. Re:Don't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't try and sound interesting

      Not a problem for a typical geek.

    19. Re:Don't... by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      So much for what you shouldn't do. My resume tip for Jobs is: "Make sure your resume includes the fact that you were CEO of Apple Computer." HTH. HAND!

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    20. Re:Don't... by oh · · Score: 1

      You want to have some personal touches. On paper you probably look the same as half a dozen other people. You want something to identify yourself. If there are three people, they might remember the guy who ways soccer, or collects stamps. Something they can associate you with, something that will help them identify you.

      As well, most people I've worked for want some one human. They want to know you can make friends, and therefore be part of a team. Sure some jobs will require a robot, but none that I want to work in.

      That said, I've had an agent cut this section out of my CV (without telling me) before passing it on to a prospective employer. I know this because one of the interviewers, my CV in hand, asked

      "This tells me a lot about your technical skills, nothing about what you do outside work. What do you do on the weekend?"

      --
      Democracy isn't about no one telling you what to do. It's about everyone telling you what to do.
    21. Re:Don't... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "3: Forget to spell check the thing."

      An automated spell check is insufficient. It won't catch you when you say you posses excellent communication skills. (This is as opposed to possess. Look it up if you don't know the difference!)

      One really great (windows) freeware tool I use all the time on any important written document is Readplease 2000. It reads the document out loud, making many hard-to-detect errors easy to find. It is also useful for people who are vision impaired because you don't need your eyes to 'read' the content of a document.

      Some other pet peeves are the confusion of possessive pronouns versus plural pronouns (its|it's|it is|it has) and in general, messed up plurals versus possessive words.

      If you're the type whose final carefully-checked document has grammar errors, then get someone else to check it! It constantly amazes me how often people whose first language is English and have an English-based university education still mix up homonyms.

    22. Re:Don't... by Jardine · · Score: 1

      There are good managers?

    23. Re:Don't... by tylerdave · · Score: 1

      There are smart headhunters?

    24. Re:Don't... by Tsuzuki · · Score: 1

      Heck, the article itself is littered with typos and misspellings... sometimes in the same paragraph. (Steven King? WTF?)

      Even if you're confident in your spell-checker and your own proofreading skills, do try to get someone else to read it through. If they haven't looked at the document half as much as you have, they're way more likely to pick out mistakes.

    25. Re:Don't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Code samples (and examples of coding related hobbies, ie your patches that are in the linux kernel) are pure butter on a resume.

      4 patches in the Linux TCP/IP stack have gotten me two jobs (with a monotonically increasing salary and benefits) in the past 1 and a half.

    26. Re:Don't... by tigga · · Score: 1
      On the other hand I'don't give a damn what person do in his/her spare time - I need a knowledgeable coworker and a good team player. I don't hire people to drink beer with me or play football.

      Oh well, I usually interview more or less senior applicants, so 'personal touches' may be more relevant to more junior people.

    27. Re:Don't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps your prospective employer will teach you the difference between a spell checker and a grammar checker.

    28. Re:Don't... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "Perhaps your prospective employer will teach you the difference between a spell checker and a grammar checker."

      Was that was supposed to be an insult? Heh. Gee, you've wounded me deeply.

    29. Re:Don't... by benedict · · Score: 2

      I dunno about number 1. The owner of the company
      I work for shares my interest in jazz. He lit up
      when he realized there'd be someone else in the
      office who knew who Clifford Brown was.

      I think one shouldn't try to be *cutesy* on one's
      resume, but that doesn't mean one can't be
      interesting.

      --
      Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
  2. Very Helpfull Article by youngerpants · · Score: 5, Funny

    Last time I had to update my CV, it took about a week in order to get all my skills in an easy to read, yet eye-catching format.

    I never realised all I had to write was

    404 Error; Page not found.

    Right then, lets send this baby off :)

  3. Resume Tip #1 by suman28 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Don't write a 10 page essay about your previous jobs

  4. This article is very useful... by saskboy · · Score: 1

    There is a career fair in 2 days, and I need to update my resume. Seems kind of early to be applying for jobs in the Summer, in the Fall, but whatever those companies want to do, I guess...

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:This article is very useful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you please post a mirror if you were lucky enough to get the article; the site is slashdotted pretty hard.

  5. Freshening resume by bytesmythe · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure about the economy speeding up, but I freshened up MY resume because I got laid off. I would hazard a guess that many people are doing the same. They've either been laid off, or are still worried about losing their jobs in the near future.

    --
    bytesmythe
    Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
    -- Scott Meyer
    1. Re:Freshening resume by jmccay · · Score: 2

      I freshened up my resume for the same reason. Now I get to send it to companies and watch it disappear into a blackhole becuase of the employers saying stuff like "no phone calls".

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
  6. Speeding up? by goldspider · · Score: 5, Funny
    "SAGEWire reports that with the economy speeding up..."

    What economy are they referring to? Certainly not the American economy...

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:Speeding up? by mdemeny · · Score: 5, Funny
      "SAGEWire reports that with the economy speeding up..."

      What economy are they referring to? Certainly not the American economy...

      I believe that speed he referred to is akin that that 'slight' acceleration you feel just after jumping out of an airplane. We're really heating up now!

    2. Re:Speeding up? by mccalli · · Score: 4, Insightful
      What economy are they referring to?

      Probably referring to 'the economy speeding up', ie. a faster and faster rate at which everything is getting cut back...

      Cheers,
      Ian

    3. Re:Speeding up? by tomzyk · · Score: 2, Funny

      hm... perhaps picking up speed going down?

      --
      Karma: NaN
    4. Re:Speeding up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are talking about the Chinese economy.

    5. Re:Speeding up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What company do you work for? Perhaps there is something wrong with it. We've seen tremendous growth in the past 4 months and are both hiring and reinstituting 401K and retirement benefits and merit raises.

    6. Re:Speeding up? by volkris · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yes, I believe he IS referring to the American economy, which has been speeding up.

      Go read the raw data, not the newspapers. The popular press cannot STAND to report the good news and good fundamentals. The American economy's slowdown during the Clinton years has ended and we've been accelerating for a couple of years now.

    7. Re:Speeding up? by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Sure you are.

      And I find that people posting AC are trustworthy.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    8. Re:Speeding up? by Comen · · Score: 0

      The American economy's slowdown during the Clinton years has ended and we've been accelerating for a couple of years now

      Hmmm that comment surprises me, What RAW data should I go read, cause it seems like during Clinton to me, the economy was doing well, and not untill alittle more than a year now has it been sucking.

    9. Re:Speeding up? by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      you're on crack.

      there aint nuthin good in the "raw numbers" - care to take a look at the beige book?

      friggin right wingers...

      its amazin, within a year of "electing" (used figuratively for GWB) a repub president there is always a war and a recession.

      you'd think that the american people would have caught on by now.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    10. Re:Speeding up? by Genuflect · · Score: 1

      Well since the President is hell bent on waging war with Iraq of course the economy is going to speed up. Nothing like a good war to boost our economy.

    11. Re:Speeding up? by ErikZ · · Score: 2

      Raw data my ass. I need a JOB. The economy hasn't changed if people like me and my friends can't get a full time JOB.

      With that paycheck we'd be happy to help the economy out and buy things. For instance, my car won't make it to the end of the year. I need a new one.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    12. Re:Speeding up? by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1

      "What economy are they referring to? Certainly not the American economy...

      No kidding.

      1) Interest rates are the lowest they've been in over 40 years.
      2) We're in the longest bear market in 60 years.

      Those are two things that not even my parents have lived through. My grandfather was 7 years old during the depression, but he thinks he's some kind of expert on hardship. Being unemployed in a righteous republican family makes me wonder how I'm still alive. They have absolutlely no experience with something like this. I'm tired of hearing about how it'll pass too. Especially when the IT sector has been by far the hardest hit.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    13. Re:Speeding up? by itsnotme · · Score: 2
      "SAGEWire reports that with the economy speeding up..."

      What economy are they referring to? Certainly not the American economy...

      I believe that speed he referred to is akin that that 'slight' acceleration you feel just after jumping out of an airplane. We're really heating up now!


      So when you hit terminal velocity shortly before you hit the ground, that'd basically be the point where the recession/depression occurs?
    14. Re:Speeding up? by paitre · · Score: 5, Informative

      *snark*
      It -may- be the longest bear market, but it certain is -not- the worst, job wise.
      We're still under 7% unemployment (or is it still under 6?). That -by itself- tells me that while it's hanging on, it certainly isn't nearly as sever as it could have been.

      Additionally, the market is -now- at about the levels it should have been if the tech bubble hadn't existed.
      As an investor, I'd be buying. Things are cheap, and at least for the short term, getting cheaper.

      As for the IT sector getting hit hardest: so what?
      How many other "techies" have you worked with that didn't have a clue, and only had the job because some manager needed a body to put in that seat? The .com I work for (and yes, there -are- many still in business) is -profitable-, and has been for the last year and a half, or so. I have a job for the next couple of years, for sure. That said, I haven't had a problem finding another job (which I start Nov 4).

      If you're having problems finding a new job, after getting laid off, one of these is true:
      1. the area you live in sucks. MOVE.
      2. you aren't nearly as skilled as you think you are.
      3. you aren't nearly as skilled as the -other- applicants are.

      More than likely it's a combination of 1 and 3. or 1 and 2 (although 2 and 3 is a good combo, too).

      And don't let that lack of a degree get you down, 5 years experience makes up for it...even in academia *smirk*

    15. Re:Speeding up? by bjcubsfan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I revamped my resume because of the exact opposite reason. The economy is not speeding up, so I need to compete better with my fellow nerds.

    16. Re:Speeding up? by NixterAg · · Score: 0, Troll

      friggin hippie left wingers...

      You're right, it is amazing. It seems that a Republican must come in every time and clean up the mess left by some socialist Democrat who taxed Americans into oblivion.

      I'm thankful every day Gore isn't in office. I'd probably still be employed but I'd be in the bread line nonetheless.

    17. Re:Speeding up? by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It -may- be the longest bear market, but it certain is -not- the worst, job wise.
      We're still under 7% unemployment (or is it still under 6?). That -by itself- tells me that while it's hanging on, it certainly isn't nearly as sever as it could have been.


      For those of you who don't know what the unemployment indicator means(like this poster) it represents the current number of unemployment claims being made. Republicans like my father love this number, because they think it means that 7 out of 100 people in the US don't have jobs...and if the other 93 people can work, so can I. Here's a quote from the .gov unemployment website:

      "Benefits can be paid for a maximum of 26 weeks in most States. "

      26 weeks is approximately 6 months. What that means is, if you get laid off you have 6 months to find another job. If you don't manage to find another job in 6 months, you are no longer eligible for unemployment. Now, the "IT depression" has been around for...about 2 years now give or take. So anyone who didn't manage to find work in 6 months(and I know many) is not included in this indicator. Potentially 75% of the people fired since 2000 could still be out of work...and this would not be reflected in the often quoted unemployment figures.

      Additionally, the market is -now- at about the levels it should have been if the tech bubble hadn't existed.
      As an investor, I'd be buying


      Ya, but you're not an investor anymore are you? Why? Because you're living from pay-check to pay-check just like everyone else.

      How many other "techies" have you worked with that didn't have a clue, and only had the job because some manager needed a body to put in that seat?

      Yes during the dot-com era there was a lot of miss-distribution of personelle. Many people were in positions they weren't qualified for...does that mean that anyone in that category doesn't deserve to have a job? You're worse than my parents.

      And don't let that lack of a degree get you down

      I have a BS in Computer Science from a top 20 engineering school.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    18. Re:Speeding up? by DohDamit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Umm...the tech bubble burst in 2000. You know, when Mr. Clinton was still in office. Kenneth Lay and Co. were high on the value of Enron in 2000. You know, when Clinton was in office.
      I'm not saying that Clinton had anything to do with either situation. But come on now, at least try to get something right, before you're sarcastic about it.

    19. Re:Speeding up? by demaria · · Score: 2

      4. The other applicants aren't as qualified, but can sell themselves better than you.
      5. Change or expand markets.

      Unemployment is under 6%, I think it's around 5%. And there are plenty of people hiring in the country, although not necessarily in IT. Of course IT was hit hardest. Over the last 4 years, there was an insane and stupid amount of spending, and nobody was seeing a good return on investment. IT should be hurting the most at this point. The economy is fine. Could be better, but fine, especially compared to other times in the US economy. The tech bubble is the chief instigator in this mess, and now things have corrected back to normal and can resume.

    20. Re:Speeding up? by rppp01 · · Score: 2

      The unemployment rate is calculated from all the unemployed people who have registered with the government, either for welfare, unemployment, or other means to show they do not have a job. It does not show those who do not have a job from voluntarily leaving, or whose unemployment status has gone beyond the 6 months of unemployment benefits.

      I think the number of 6 or 7% is too low. Kick that up to around 9 or perhaps 10% and you have the real numbers.

      If you add in students that don't work, it would be higher. I think the government is playing with numbers here. I know too many people who are without a job, as compared to 18 months ago. And this is between Texas and Arizona.

      --
      They stuck me in an institution, said it was the only solution, to...protect me from the enemy, myself
    21. Re:Speeding up? by FatherOfONe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just to agree with the other posters...

      Do you have ANY data to back this up? Why is it that they are considering lowering intrest rates again? It isn't because the economy is flat or growing.

      Being conservative is one thing. I consider myself conservative, and I will admit that the economy was slowing down before GWB got in office, but to say that it is picking up makes you sound like an idiot. I guess you could point out that not as many companies are folding this year as last... :-)

      Just because someone is concervative doens't mean they have to take everything Rush says as gospil. Please remember that he still believes that Microsoft didn't do anything wrong. :-)

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
    22. Re:Speeding up? by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      too bad the "recession" didnt start until March 2001.

      and who was captain of the ship then?

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    23. Re:Speeding up? by paitre · · Score: 1
      Ya, but you're not an investor anymore are you? Why? Because you're living from pay-check to pay-check just like everyone else

      Actually, I'm clearing 6 figures, thankyouverymuch.

      I have a BS in Computer Science from a top 20 engineering school.

      And that means you're special? Seriously. As a hiring manager, I don't -CARE- where your damned degree came from. I really don't. I -care- about what you really know by demonstation, and no, going to CalTech or MIT, or some other "Top 20" school -DOESN'T- prove it to me.

      Oh, and I'm fully aware of what the unemployment figures mean. I lived through the first Bush recession, and watched my dad sit out of work for 6 months.

      The fact of the matter is: -experience- is what counts right now, and damned be the degree (although it'll affect what you get paid). Of course, if you're still having that much difficulty finding a job in your area, you are still free to move.

      I hear a clearance and 5 years experience gets you 60-100k in the DC area.

    24. Re:Speeding up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a job for the next couple of years, for sure. That said, I haven't had a problem finding another job (which I start Nov 4).

      Good for you, arrogant twit!

    25. Re:Speeding up? by FatherOfONe · · Score: 1

      I am considered old by some people and I can only think of ONE time it was worse in recent American history, that was in the early 1930's. (No I wasn't alive then).

      The early and mid 70's kinda sucked, but it wasn't as bad as now.

      The very late 80's and early 90's kinda sucked to but not near as bad as now.

      You point to unemployment as a barameter, but remember that it only last around 6 months. Also you have to look at the quality of jobs people had to what they have now. If someone was an executive sales rep and now greets people at Walmart, that is a GIANT setback to the economy.

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
    26. Re:Speeding up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're still under 7% unemployment (or is it still under 6?). That -by itself- tells me that while it's hanging on, it certainly isn't nearly as sever as it could have been.

      This is overall. For the tech sector it is closer to 10%, and even higher in tech-centric geographic areas.

    27. Re:Speeding up? by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1

      I hear a clearance and 5 years experience gets you 60-100k in the DC area.


      That's some very positive news for us recent graduates. Know where I can borrow 5 years of experience?

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    28. Re:Speeding up? by NixterAg · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Oh my goodness. I post the same thing as the parent and I'm a troll, while his is modded up as interesting.

      The inmates are running the asylum.

    29. Re:Speeding up? by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, the recession is the trip down. The depression is what is left in the ground after the recession in this case has ended.

    30. Re:Speeding up? by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      i thought it as amusing too...

      or, it could be taken as a sign of the prevailing winds :-)

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    31. Re:Speeding up? by NixterAg · · Score: 1

      I simply don't believe that you actually buy that line of crap. I think you just like trolling.

      You really think a president can have an effect on the economy within a month and a half of his presidency?????

    32. Re:Speeding up? by NixterAg · · Score: 1

      I think your prevailing winds blew by the chicken houses before they got to Slashdot because all you did was expunge a lot of hot air and it stinks too.

    33. Re:Speeding up? by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      dude - the man is a walking talking failure - for christs sakes - he didnt even win the election.

      he got "gentlemen's c's" from yale, drove several business' into the ground, has a couple of drunk sluts for daughters and a wife who should be the poster-child for prozac and xanax.

      he a coked-up drunk fratboy.

      not qualified to hold the office he's in, at ALL...

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    34. Re:Speeding up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Raw data my ass. I need a JOB. The economy hasn't changed if people like me and my friends can't get a full time JOB.

      There's your problem: you hang out with *other* geeks.

    35. Re:Speeding up? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      cause it seems like during Clinton to me, the economy was doing well, and not untill alittle more than a year now has it been sucking.

      It started down-hill when the stock market popped in March 2000, the last year of the Clinton admin.

      I personally don't think the prez has much affect on the economy, at least not in the short-term. Regulating the economy is outside of their constitional duties, except for maybe stimulus packages (AKA "spending tax money") and good-will speaches.

    36. Re:Speeding up? by Izmunuti · · Score: 1

      I think your definition of unemployment doesn't match the one used for the well-known government statistic.

      Unemployment is a measure of the people who are are out of work and actively looking for a job.

      It doesn't matter whether or not one has been fired or laid off or if one is receiving benefits or not. People do not fall out of the statistic after their benefits, if any, run out, provided they are still looking. If one stops looking, to retire or to stay home with the kids or to go back to school, then one does stop being "unemployed". People who have not worked or looked for work for decades can suddenly become unemployed if they decide to start looking for a job.

      The number of people receiving jobless benefits, the number of unemployed, and the number of people who do not work at a paying job, are all different numbers.

    37. Re:Speeding up? by NixterAg · · Score: 1

      ...and yet still infinitely more qualified than Gore. ...and yes he did win the election. Everyone who's gone into Florida to do a recount (using every criteria imaginable) has conceded that Bush received more votes. This argument is not just tired, it's dead, buried, and rotting. Get over it McAuliffe.

    38. Re:Speeding up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any wagers that this guy has a mediocre academic background at best?

    39. Re:Speeding up? by cmcguffin · · Score: 1

      > As an investor, I'd be buying. Things are cheap

      The S&P 500, as a group, has a price to earnings ratio of more than 30.
      The historical average is 15.

      The S&P dividend yield is approximately 1.5 The historical average is approximately 4.5.

      Some people claim that you can't use p-to-e, dividiend yields, price-to-book, or any of the time-proven methods of valuing stocks any more. "This time, things are different!" they cry.

      That refrain certainly sounds famililar... And it sounded familiar in the late 1920's as well.

      Yes, stocks are certainly cheaper than they were a year ago. But they're definitely not "cheap"!

    40. Re:Speeding up? by Anitra · · Score: 1

      So where is a college senior to get this "experience" you speak of? Only jobs I've been able to get are grunt work for a little more than minimum wage. And I can't do more unpaid stuff, because I've got to support myself and pass my classes. Any suggestions?

      (No, I don't have a lot of skills... yet. That's the point of this question.) Easy for you to say you just need experience - you've already got it.

      --

      Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
    41. Re:Speeding up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how much hiring are you doing right now, Mr. Clearing 6 Figures?

    42. Re:Speeding up? by DohDamit · · Score: 2

      Right...and you believe that Bush, president for a month and a half, had more of an impact than Clinton, president for eight years. Come on now...

    43. Re:Speeding up? by DohDamit · · Score: 2

      Right...and the presidency is about morality. Oh wait...

    44. Re:Speeding up? by abischof · · Score: 2

      The unemployment rate is calculated from all the unemployed people who have registered with the government, either for welfare, unemployment, or other means to show they do not have a job.

      It's not the case that "the government understates the unemployment rate because they report how many people are collecting unemployment insurance rather than how many people are out of work".

      --

      Alex Bischoff
      HTML/CSS coder for hire

    45. Re:Speeding up? by paitre · · Score: 2

      Agreed.
      I wasn't talking about the indexes, I was talking about specific stocks.
      personally, I won't touch any of the "big name" stocks. For the most part, their fundamentals -do- suck.
      long term investments, at least on my side, tend towards those companies that pay dividends. you can't bank -just- on growth stocks...and you really never could.

      Aside from that, you're right, I should have said cheaper, instead of cheap. :\

    46. Re:Speeding up? by gid-goo · · Score: 1

      Yep. When people have confidence in their leader and the direction of the country the economy does well. Bush does nothing but scare the shit out of everyone who hears him (and has any money). Investors flee the market. Personally, I also think that Bush is killing the tech market. His focus on oil, timber and natural resources and lack of interest in anything tech isn't helping any of us. The bubble burst but Bush isn't helping pick up any of the positive pieces.

    47. Re:Speeding up? by weaselgrrl · · Score: 1
      1) Interest rates are the lowest they've been in over 40 years.

      Wow! We can actually afford to buy a house and move out of this rental hole! Whooopeee!

      2) We're in the longest bear market in 60 years.

      Oh... but then there is the current value of our stock options. Never mind...

      --
      I spent all of those years as Anonymous Coward and all I got was this lousy number (204976).
    48. Re:Speeding up? by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      but... clinton... wasnt president then...

      whatever happened to "personal responsibility" ?

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    49. Re:Speeding up? by paitre · · Score: 2

      1. Hobbies. Someone else said to -not- put hobbies on your resume. I strongly disagree. If your hobby is doing something -directly- related to the job you're trying to get, put it on there. Especially bring it up in the interview, too.
      2. It's not glamorous, and it's -not- fun, but CompUSA and BestBuy have technicians in their stores. $7-10 bucks an hour is better than nothing, and you'd be suprised how many folks get their start there. (Of the crew at the CompUSA I worked in 5 years ago, 2/3's of us went on to making 35k+ within a year of my start date..most of us clear 70 now). Besides, the discounts there kick ass.

      3. It's actually -easier- to find a job when you already have one. HR and hiring managers can -smell- desperation coming, especially when you don't have a job.

      I do actually feel for you. It -sucks- coming into a job market that isn't hiring, unless you have experience. You're going to have to start hitting any connections you might have. Talk to your ISP...talk to your webhost, hell, if you have a couple hundred or a thousand to spend, try starting up your own webhosting company.

      l8r.

    50. Re:Speeding up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is overall. For the tech sector it is closer to 10%, and even higher in tech-centric geographic areas.

      Does anybody have *real* statistics from state unemployment offices, not just guesses from those PAC ITAA aholes?

      Why is it so hard to get actual counts? Is somebody purposely hiding something?

    51. Re:Speeding up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't feel bad, Slashdot is chock full of socialist idiots. Even the editors are left wing retards. And don't forget about our socialist "friends" across the pond. And finally you have the college kids who have been indoctrinated by some communist sociology professor.

    52. Re:Speeding up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are leftist nutcase. The downturn in the economy happened way before Bush took office.

      These democrats couldn't tell the truth if their lives depended on it. geez

    53. Re:Speeding up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To get a clearance, you need to have a job that requires a clearance. To get a job that requires a clearance you need --can you guess what's coming?-- a CLEARANCE!!!

      I tried that route when I thought I was going to be laid off. The companies in DC are just cannibalizing each others employees because they don't want to invest in training someone who, six months later, gets denied a clearance. Fortunately, I got to keep my job. I just had to move.

    54. Re:Speeding up? by Atryn · · Score: 1

      I believe today that this is a misnomer.

      People who say this usually use WWI, WWII, Vietnam / Korea as examples, or even the Cold War. However, none of these models are anything like the Iraq possibility today.

      All of those models involved prolonged conflicts in which new technologies and new economic efficiencies were necessary in order to win. The government and the business community both poured resources into R&D and created new economic models and new products, many of which remained to strengthen the economy after the wars.

      In this case, everyone has said many times that "we have the technology, we have the capability, it can be over in a few months"... This sort of conflict (akin to Gulf War I) will have little to no impact on the domestic economy, IMHO.

      --
      Come play Moral Decay!
    55. Re:Speeding up? by NixterAg · · Score: 1

      I wonder who 'investors' voted for? I'll bet a dime to a dollar that, by and large, Wall Street voted for Bush. Why do you think the Harvard Business School is convervative?

      Quit making stuff up.

    56. Re:Speeding up? by NixterAg · · Score: 1

      convervative = conservative

    57. Re:Speeding up? by mother+pussbucket · · Score: 1

      "The downturn in the economy happened way before Bush took office."

      Just about the time it became obvious to everyone that W was about to steal the election.

      --
      Yes, it's true. This man has no dick.
    58. Re:Speeding up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. the area you live in sucks. MOVE.
      2. you aren't nearly as skilled as you think you are.
      3. you aren't nearly as skilled as the -other- applicants are.


      4. You work in an ISP, or a telco.
    59. Re:Speeding up? by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      Quoth the Young Republican:

      "If you're having problems finding a new job, after getting laid off, one of these is true:

      1. the area you live in sucks. MOVE.
      2. you aren't nearly as skilled as you think you are.
      3. you aren't nearly as skilled as the -other- applicants are."

      Responds the older Green:

      Of course it could be:
      4. The value of an American IT worker's labor is now nil, because A) companies can hire H1-Bs for a fraction of the cost and hold the promise of a green card over their heads like a guillotine blade, B) Many companies no longer want to maintain an internal IT staff, they want to outsource to some cheapo third-rate outfit to improve their expense reports, and C) rampant age discrimination in the IT industry means that you're usually washed up at 35 unless you're a researcher.

      Of course, then there's my personal favorite:
      5. Many recruiters are lying so brazenly on the resumes they submit for you (after they "touch them up" I mean) that employers no longer believe anything they see on a resume. When everything is suspect, real-live solid experience is assumed to be a lie.

      The IT industry is a sham. Work for the government, and let private industry go to hell. You'll feel better.

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    60. Re:Speeding up? by guttentag · · Score: 3, Informative
      It -may- be the longest bear market, but it certain is -not- the worst, job wise. We're still under 7% unemployment (or is it still under 6?). That -by itself- tells me that while it's hanging on, it certainly isn't nearly as sever as it could have been.
      There was an article in The New York Times just two days ago which claims the unemployment figure is wrong and misleading. Analysts say a significant and growing number of people either don't fit the government's inaccurate definition of unemployed, or the government has no way of counting them in the figure. The article says the real unemployment rate is probably closer to that of the recession-mired early 80s.
    61. Re:Speeding up? by xtremex · · Score: 1

      Even though I'm not a liberal red diaper baby, I think Martin Luther King was one of the better DEmocratic Spokesmen. He was not the left-wing of today. He said "Don't buy from any company that won't hire you". He was referring to the blacks, but it applies everywhere. For example, MS is 85% immigrants and H-1B Visa workers, and they expect Americans to buy their products, yet they won't hire Americans. The economy is not controlled by the "elite" who are for globalism and cheap labor. Keep us out of work, but still expect us to be good consumers.

      --
      If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
    62. Re:Speeding up? by xtremex · · Score: 1

      Explain the "tech worker shortage" they were touting a couple of years ago which caused them to allow 400,000 tech workers a year from India? If there's still a shortage, we should all be working.

      --
      If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
    63. Re:Speeding up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "So where is a college senior to get this "experience" you speak of? Only jobs I've been able to get are grunt work for a little more than minimum wage. And I can't do more unpaid stuff, because I've got to support myself and pass my classes. Any suggestions?"


      Errr, work 5 years....


      Your college isn't spitting out the very bright ones anymore.

    64. Re:Speeding up? by t · · Score: 1

      I think all those numbers are a crock. What I'd like to see is how many people had a gross income over say $20k or whatever. Ideally, a nice little graph of percentage of the populace versus gross. That way you can see how many people are basically screwed.

    65. Re:Speeding up? by guttentag · · Score: 3, Informative
      Since the article doesn't provide any of the unemployment statistics it talks about, here is the U.S. unemployment rate over the last 20 years, provided by the New Mexico Dept. of Labor:
      Year: 1982 Rate: 9.7%
      Year: 1983 Rate: 9.6%
      Year: 1984 Rate: 7.5%
      Year: 1985 Rate: 7.2%
      Year: 1986 Rate: 7.0%
      Year: 1987 Rate: 6.2%
      Year: 1988 Rate: 7.2%
      Year: 1989 Rate: 5.5%
      Year: 1990 Rate: 5.3%
      Year: 1991 Rate: 5.6%
      Year: 1992 Rate: 6.8%
      Year: 1993 Rate: 7.5%
      Year: 1994 Rate: 6.9%
      Year: 1995 Rate: 6.1%
      Year: 1996 Rate: 5.6%
      Year: 1997 Rate: 5.4%
      Year: 1998 Rate: 4.5%
      Year: 1999 Rate: 4.9%
      Year: 2000 Rate: 4.2%

      Month: JAN 2001 Rate: 4.2%
      Month: FEB 2001 Rate: 4.2%
      Month: MAR 2001 Rate: 4.3%
      Month: APR 2001 Rate: 4.5%
      Month: MAY 2001 Rate: 4.4%
      Month: JUN 2001 Rate: 4.6%
      Month: JUL 2001 Rate: 4.6%
      Month: AUG 2001 Rate: 4.9%
      Month: SEP 2001 Rate: 5.0%
      Month: OCT 2001 Rate: 5.4%
      Month: NOV 2001 Rate: 5.6%
      Month: DEC 2001 Rate: 5.8%

      Month: JAN 2002 Rate: 5.6%
      Month: FEB 2002 Rate: 5.5%
      Month: MAR 2002 Rate: 5.7%
      Month: APR 2002 Rate: 6.0%
      Month: MAY 2002 Rate: 5.8%
      Month: JUN 2002 Rate: 5.9%
      Month: JUL 2002 Rate: 5.9%
      So what the article is saying is unemployment is closer to 10% than 6%. That's a big difference.
    66. Re:Speeding up? by forkboy · · Score: 2

      the area you live in sucks. MOVE.

      It's not that easy, pal. We've been trying to get out of Denver for months now. It costs real money to move, and more apartments or houses for rent won't let you in without a job, even if you have some cash on hand. And many employers won't hire someone from out of state unless they can get there for an interview in person. (Which the employer does not pay for and we can't afford doing for "maybe" getting a job)

      As far as points 2 and 3 go, heh, yeah, you're dead on there. There's ALWAYS someone better than you out there, and when so many people are unemployed, chances are good that someone is applying for the same job.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    67. Re:Speeding up? by QuackQuack · · Score: 1


      P/E IS a bad way to measure stocks because it doesn't a number of things into account, like debt levels, potential opportunity, impending doom, etc. The only think P/E can tell you is how in demand a particular stock is. And that won't even give you a clue as to whether it's a good investment, think Cisco, Enron, etc.

      Dividends have fallen out of favor over the past decade because investors preferred growth stocks that reinvest their divedend. Now the tide has turned and dividends have started coming back in vogue again. Look for companies that can afford to pay them to pay more of them.

      Price to book is more interesting, because book value is the estimated value a company would fetch if all their assets were liquidated. But it doesn't tell you if a company is making or losing money and a number of other things.

      In short none of these metrics are useful on their own for measuring stocks. People who use them to argue that the bear hasn't reached bottom are ignoring the fact that they are comparing the current conditions to previous AVERAGES. Not all bear markets end with an average P/E of 15, some were higher, some were lower. Think about this, the average bear market lasts 18-20 mos. We've already shattered that. If this bear doesn't stop at 18 months, then why should reason that it will stop at 15 p/e, 4.5% yield, etc?

      It will end when the conditions weighing down the market improve, when we see solid economic data, better earnings, no more Enrons, less uncertainty over Iraq and terrorism.

      --
      By reading this sig, you agree to the terms of my sig license.
    68. Re:Speeding up? by foobar104 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Actually, I'm clearing 6 figures, thankyouverymuch.

      Get fucked, thankyouverymuch. Nobody likes a braggart.

    69. Re:Speeding up? by opposume · · Score: 0

      I believe they are talking about the actual numbers. Not the electoral college. If you looked at the amount of votes cast, Gore had a stagering amount more than bush. It's just that bush happened to win more states (or states with a greater amount of votes in the electoral college) There for Bush won based on that. So technically they BOTH won. Gore w/ the raw votes and Bush with the electoral college...

      --
      I haven't lost my mind. It's backed up on disk somewhere.
    70. Re:Speeding up? by 2short · · Score: 1

      Well, lets see, I started out with the same dillemma and got my experience doing what... Oh, I remember! Grunt work for a little more than minimum wage.
      Seriously though, try to find grunt work that's sorta-kinda-maybe related to what you want to do, and keep at it. Also try to concentrate on what you want to do (i.e. enjoy and are good at) If you try to go for something you don't actually like in hopes of bucks, you'll wind up sucking at it and won't get the bucks.

    71. Re:Speeding up? by 2short · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you've heard of this tech bubble bursting thing there's been all this talk about? The demand for tech workers may not be as strong today as two years ago.

    72. Re:Speeding up? by nathanh · · Score: 2
      As an investor, I'd be buying. Things are cheap, and at least for the short term, getting cheaper.

      Which would make you a pretty bloody awful investor.

    73. Re:Speeding up? by magister707 · · Score: 0

      Yes during the dot-com era there was a lot of miss-distribution of personelle.

      You might consider having someone with english skills do your resume.

    74. Re:Speeding up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like that quote: "Don't buy from any company that won't hire you."

      Do you by any chance have the source of the quote? A casual Google'ing didn't turn up the original utterance for me ......

    75. Re:Speeding up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the argument is tired.

      Gore received about 10,000 more votes in Florida than Bush. Most of these were "overvotes" - someone punched the Gore hole, and wrote "Gore" in the write in space. The machines rejected these votes, and they are legal and valid votes for Gore under Florida law. The only full hand recounts that were done was by the coalition of newspapers (including the ultra Republican Wall Street Journal) - and that's where the numbers come from.

      The reason there was no official hand recount in Florida was because the 5 Republican justices on the Supreme Court said that a full hand recount of the votes would violate Bush's right to be president. Read Bush vs. Gore, which you probably haven't.

      So yes, the argument that "Bush won because 10,000 votes were ignored" is indeed tired.

    76. Re:Speeding up? by xtremex · · Score: 1

      Hmmm..then why are they still here. Actually, there was NEVER a shortage. It was the US's way of getting cheap labor.

      --
      If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
    77. Re:Speeding up? by xtremex · · Score: 2

      It was a quote from Martin Luther King, Jr..I paraphrased..he said it more eloquently than I did :) Look up quotes from Martin Luther King Jr.

      --
      If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
    78. Re:Speeding up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BUZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

      Wrong-o.

    79. Re:Speeding up? by DohDamit · · Score: 1

      Okay...this is done.
      Why? Well, either you're a troll, or the obvious is beyond you, in which case I simply can't help you.

    80. Re:Speeding up? by xyzzy-ladder · · Score: 1

      The majority of newspaper reports say "Jobless claims either up or down" - which is indeed the rate that people are claiming joblessness (to unemployment and other govt programs).

      The "unemployment" rate is based on "unemployed people actively seeking a job" - if you work one day a month, you are considered employed. If you are not "looking for work" every day, you are "not unemployed".

      The true unemployment rate in the US is nearing 10%, if you are talking about regular full time employment - very similar to Europe.

      In any case, the Bush administration has put out false statistics every month for over a year now, and revises the numbers (very quietly) downward. Doesn't anyone read the newspapers anymore?

      I prefer the Wall Street Journal, insterestingly enough, the editorials are the most right wing, conservative, pro-Republican in America. The editorials are a joke, but the reporters are top notch (separate divisions, and a very different culture). They cover the facts of the economy very well.

      --
      There are two types of people; those who divide people into two types of people, and those who don't.
    81. Re:Speeding up? by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1
      Yep. When people have confidence in their leader and the direction of the country the economy does well. Bush does nothing but scare the shit out of everyone who hears him (and has any money). Investors flee the market. Personally, I also think that Bush is killing the tech market. His focus on oil, timber and natural resources and lack of interest in anything tech isn't helping any of us. The bubble burst but Bush isn't helping pick up any of the positive pieces.

      Well put. The inverstor in Germany in 30's did the same thing. In both cases the biggest drive was corperate socialism, when the goverment is handing out cash to the corperations, what should the invistors do? Investing X money in a corperation give you X say in that corperation because the corp. needs the investment money, but if the goverment in handing out $$$ then why should the corperations act in the interest of there investors. Remember, the money Bush gave to the airlines was OUR money, and I sure didn't get any shares in any airline...

      Corperate welfare brings us really close to becoming a National Socialist country. Does anybody know another word that means National Socialist? How did this happen? Do we want to change this, or is it what we really really want?

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
    82. Re:Speeding up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Okay...this is done.

      DohDamit: Doh! You made a fool of me, but you'll never get me to admit that I'm wrong! I can't back up my views, so I'm just going to call you a troll. If I can't win, I'm not going to play at all. *pouts*

    83. Re:Speeding up? by demaria · · Score: 2

      "You point to unemployment as a barameter"

      Please point out where I make that claim.

    84. Re:Speeding up? by Anitra · · Score: 1

      Errr, work 5 years....

      Your college isn't spitting out the very bright ones anymore.


      Funny, wise guy. Is flipping burgers counted as experience? Cuz that's the only job I can get right now.

      --

      Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
    85. Re:Speeding up? by davidm25 · · Score: 1

      Dividends are also a very tax inefficient mechanism since 1996( don't quote me on that year) when the tax laws dealing with capital gains were changed. Since you pay have the tax ( 31-39 vs 20 for most people), you don't want your company paying dividends. Up until the law change you lost out of componding ( ie you had to pay taxes every year) but the rate was the same. As an investor, it is a lot better for you for the company to buy back stock (raises the value of the stock) and let you decide when you want to pay taxes. The only really good things about dividends is as one investor says "They are a lot harder to fake than earnings."

    86. Re:Speeding up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're still under 7% unemployment (or is it still under 6?)

      Horse... shit.

      If you're having problems finding a new job, after getting laid off, one of these is true:
      1. the area you live in sucks. MOVE.
      2. you aren't nearly as skilled as you think you are.
      3. you aren't nearly as skilled as the -other- applicants are.


      4. Hiring managers are feckless, cynical idiots who are too impressed with themselves to actually produce anything, or hire anyone.

      Don't waste your time.

      And don't let that lack of a degree get you down, 5 years experience makes up for it...even in academia

      I've got both. It doesn't matter.

    87. Re:Speeding up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I'm clearing 6 figures, thankyouverymuch.

      Nice troll, smartass.

      And that means you're special? Seriously. As a hiring manager, I don't -CARE- where your damned degree came from.

      And if you worked for me and said something like that I'd fire your ass so fast you'd make a thunderclap in the lobby.

      The fact of the matter is: -experience- is what counts right now, and damned be the degree (although it'll affect what you get paid).

      I've got colleagues with 10 solid years of experience and they couldn't get a return call if they included the quarter with the resume.

      This "apologist for the status quo" crap doesn't fly anymore. Find something else to troll with.

    88. Re:Speeding up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worked for me, so it might work for you.

      People seem really impressed with patches in the linux kernel, or somtimes in FreeBSD (most people with hire/fire authority have never heard of netbsd or openbsd, sorry).

      I dropped out of college after a year 3 years ago, and my salary has increased about 20% a year for the past 3 years (including this "down" year). I broke 6 figs in 2000.

      If you're looking for a job doing J2EE "programming" you might have a rough time of it, but if you have useful and rare skills, the economy is as good as its ever been.

      Posted anon since its not really bragging if no one knows who you are...

    89. Re:Speeding up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus fucking christ. I've a college dropout with 2 years of experience, in the bay area (ie, the place with the most unemployed techies in the world) and I had a job within a month of looking when I left my last position. A nice pay raise too.

      You people either are completely brain dead when it comes to your chosen profession, or you have no idea how to handle an application and an interview.

    90. Re:Speeding up? by paitre · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, I wasn't a Republicrat.

      4. My father is over 50, and is making a nice living working for Lockheed Martin in the DC area. He's had very little trouble finding jobs since 1993. *shrug* I fully agree that there -is- age discrimination, though, and that the IT worker value has shrunk, due in -part- to the H1B's (which I'm -violently- against, I might add).

      5. *nod* Yup. Which is why people shouldn't be using recruiters, and going directly to HR -or- to people they know already working there.

      And yeah, government work rocks. Part of why I'm getting a job with a large reaserch university on the east coast. I'm tired of working 60 hour weeks, and not getting to play with some cool hardware :)

    91. Re:Speeding up? by spanky555 · · Score: 1

      My guess is that within the software community, in Denver, anyway, it might be more like 15-20%. Nearly every developer I know has been laid off for two months or more during the past 2 years. Some have left the industry entirely.

      As for one poster's comments about the qualified still being able to find jobs, I'd say this economy favors brown-nosers more than it does the best people...at least in my experience. The last two places I've been laid off, there were people still working at those jobs with 1/2 the experience, 1/2 the intelligence, and 1/2 the credentials as myself and others that were laid off...and these were people who always said the boss' ideas were wonderful ideas, no matter how dumb, and also made sure to go and personally kiss ass a lot, too.

      Now, I have a BSCS, nearly 10 years of experience, and I also have what I consider a good attitude and work ethic(but I'm not a sycophant)...but I have no job. Go figure.

    92. Re:Speeding up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're on glue if you think Bush is more "qualified" than Gore! By what standards, pray tell? Perhaps you were joking..but then again, there are plenty of people who are equally stupid ( like you) and say things like this, waste millions of barrels of oil flying those little flags on their cars, and actually think Bush is a genius...

    93. Re:Speeding up? by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      Ah! A fellow green? Hmm...

      You mentioned that " 4. My father is over 50, and is making a nice living working for Lockheed Martin in the DC area. He's had very little trouble finding jobs since 1993. *shrug* I fully agree that there -is- age discrimination, though, and that the IT worker value has shrunk, due in -part- to the H1B's (which I'm -violently- against, I might add)."

      As far as Lockheed Martin goes, that's impressive. If he has a security clearance, that would explain this somewhat -- he can't be easily replaced by a younger or more foreign worker. On the other hand, maybe being a government contractor, they're prohibited from even the appearance of age discrimination? This would imply that Lockheed Martin would be a good place to work.

      About H1-Bs, am I the only one who finds it terrifying that now even the school systems are bringing in foreign workers? I don't want my kids having to learn math at the hands of some weirdo who can barely speak English, or -- worse! -- having to take something like social studies from someone who may not particularly like America in the first place. I had to deal with enough of that in college. Now it's happening in grade school! Eeek! Ok, what was the number of that private catholic prep school, again? From now on, I'm giving my kin over to the Franciscans. ;)

      Then you said: "5. *nod* Yup. Which is why people shouldn't be using recruiters, and going directly to HR -or- to people they know already working there.
      And yeah, government work rocks. Part of why I'm getting a job with a large reaserch university on the east coast. I'm tired of working 60 hour weeks, and not getting to play with some cool hardware :)"

      Which I agree with 100%. Once I stopped using recruiters and started concentrating on government jobs, everything changed. It's like the old cliche when a storm suddenly clears up, rays of sunlight come through the clouds, birds start to sing and a dove settles down on your shoulder.

      As far as universities go, I think about grad school a lot. I'd love to go back for my master's. Besides, I hear the NSA is hiring people with security related graduate degrees (double hmm...) to build security systems.

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    94. Re:Speeding up? by IndependentVik · · Score: 1

      HR and hiring managers can -smell- desperation coming . . .

      They're like women that way.

      --
      I'd suggest you don't use Slashdot as your only news source, or you will suffer permanent brain damage.
    95. Re:Speeding up? by IndependentVik · · Score: 1

      I hear you, man, I'm a recent college grad myself--took me months to get the job I have now, and I had 3 years of experience interning at a nationally known tech-company. The sheer lack of empathy in this place just astounds me.

      --
      I'd suggest you don't use Slashdot as your only news source, or you will suffer permanent brain damage.
    96. Re:Speeding up? by humblecoder · · Score: 1

      Please mod this down. If you go to the Bureau of Labor Statistics website (http://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_faq.htm), you will see that their definition of unemployed is:

      "Persons are classified as unemployed if they do not have a job, have actively looked for work in the prior 4 weeks, and are currently available for work."

      It says nothing about currently collecting unemployment benefits, or the like.

    97. Re:Speeding up? by humblecoder · · Score: 1

      Where do people come up with this misinformation!!

      From the Bureau of Labor Statistics web site (www.bls.gov):

      "Persons are classified as unemployed if they do not have a job, have actively looked for work in the prior 4 weeks, and are currently available for work."

    98. Re:Speeding up? by volkris · · Score: 1

      The stock market numbers are not the same as the economy. However, a large part of the stock market's going downhill is directly attributable to Clinton's policies, as are the current corporate scandals.

      Clinton policies put unnatural and pointless restrictions on the payment of corporate officials, who then came up with other, more creative ways to attract officers, removing a large amount of their accountability to the boards of directors.

      It's simple: force the situation so that they're judged on things that would be easily influenced by deceptive behavior, and they will behave deceptively.

    99. Re:Speeding up? by volkris · · Score: 1

      Actually he did.
      Just look at his first two months and you'll see that he did more than Clinton did in an entire term.

      To a large part this is thanks to him having an extremely cooperative legislature.

      Good or bad, Bush did have a much larger impact much more quickly than Clinton.

    100. Re:Speeding up? by volkris · · Score: 1

      He won or tied the election fairly from every angle you want.

      That Gore won the popular vote is even nonsense; voting technology isn't advanced enough to show anything other than a draw.

      And no, the downturn in the economy was showing up two years before the end of Clinton's presidency.

    101. Re:Speeding up? by DohDamit · · Score: 2

      I'd love to believe this. I really would. Unfortunately, this rather simplistic ideal is something that doesn't hold up to facts. Companies overbought the vision of a new generation of snake oil salesmen. Several trillion dollars later, we have a few really harsh lessons to show for it. Truthfully, neither president can be faulted for the mess. If you want to look for a source of this disaster, take a look at your fellow commuters, who bought stock in Exodus, Pets.com, Allair, and their ilk. Everyone was a genius, and no one wanted to be left out. When the lights flitted on(what, we have to make money?) off the entepreneurs went into the shadows. Don't blame Bush, don't blame Clinton. Neither of them made the general public pony up for this losing gamble-the New Economy.

    102. Re:Speeding up? by volkris · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, but a whole lot of information that people based their information on was faulty because of poor auditing. The auditors audited based on the wishes of the corporate leadership. In theory the leadership was accountable to the board of directors and stockholders in general.

      The new regulations did a bit to erode this accountability, as the profits to the officers came more from stock price than actual performance (stock options instead of salarys and bonuses). From there came a drive to get that stock price up without nearly the same thought to the fundamentals of the company.

      So right: the public shouldn't have believed the auditors, the board of directors should have watched the auditors more closely, and the officers certainly shouldn't have asked for the audits in these ways. It's also not the ex president's fault, he didn't force anyone to engage in such affairs.

      However, Clinton's policies did act as a catalyst setting the stage and encouraging the activities that lead to the meltdown. And for no reason! The policies didn't do a bit of good. These corporate officals got just the same amount of money, just through different channels.

    103. Re:Speeding up? by DohDamit · · Score: 1

      No content...I'll reply when I'm more awake. Just wanted to say that I couldn't agree with you more. I'll give you a deserving response during the day.

  7. STEP ONE by EEgopher · · Score: 0

    Interview tips:
    1) Have at least 2 summers internship experience at this company.

    2) Own products made by this company, and bring them to work at your internship.

    3) Use the word "absolutely" with reckless abandon.

    4) Go Platinum, seven times.

    --
    hi, I like pancakes -.-- -.-- --..
  8. some tips - by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    DO NOT put an "Objective" section at the top of your resume, they're all bullshit, never relevant and only limiting, and when you hand someone your resume, your objective is simple - TO GET A JOB FROM THEM.

    You have 2-4 inches to catch someone's eye - if you've got a college degree put it there, and next, put your most relevant work experience.

    customize your resume for the job you're applying for.

    --
    ... hi bingo ...
    1. Re:some tips - by PDHoss · · Score: 3, Funny

      You have 2-4 inches to catch someone's eye...

      Please note: the preceding tip would not be applicable if you are applying for a position (ahem) as "Male Porn Actor."

      PDHoss

      --
      ======================================
      Writers get in shape by pumping irony.
    2. Re:some tips - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Far and away the best objectives I've ever seen on a resume (and I quote): "To work hard at whatever my boss wants me to do."

    3. Re:some tips - by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I try to customize every resume I submit. If I submit a resume to company XYZ then my objective reads, "To work at company XYZ...(doing whatever w/ whatever job description I am applying for)"

    4. Re:some tips - by 2short · · Score: 1

      Yes! You just made my "read the whole thing" pile while the other 95% that sent me the same resume they sent everyone else went straight to the trash can. Ideally, I'd be slightly more subtle, but not so much that they don't get the point: You've spent at least a small amount of time thinking about whether this job is right for you. To those that send out any more than 10 resumes a day, I say this: If you can't spend the time to figure out if the position I've got is right for you, why should I? Both of my last two job hunts were highly successful (great jobs found quickly). In both of them combined, how many resumes did I send out? Three.

    5. Re:some tips - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, "nailing" the job description appears disingenuous. What are the odds your true objective so accurately lines up with my needs?

      Were you truely born to serve me? Or are you just just starting our relationship on a lie?

  9. If you have no experience by ch-chuck · · Score: 5, Funny

    you can always add "did volunteer work rating messages submitted to a public web site. Work involved reading posted comments, deciding quality and relevance of posting, and moderating accordingly. Also did oversight work rating moderators performance."

    or

    "managed a wide area information distribution network involving the exchange of compressed aural and adult entertainment products. Work involved maintenance of clandistine anti-detection systems and frequent network reconfigurations for various Internet service providers".

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:If you have no experience by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you can always add "did volunteer work rating messages submitted to a public web site. Work involved reading posted comments, deciding quality and relevance of posting, and moderating accordingly. Also did oversight work rating moderators performance."

      Perhaps you could add "Rated people poorly who made comments that were over my head by moderating them down despite the fact they were insightful, funny, or full of usefull information. Continue to do this because I am an idiot"

      I like that idea.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    2. Re:If you have no experience by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      you can always add "did volunteer work rating messages submitted to a public web site. Work involved reading posted comments, deciding quality and...

      Dude, you should offer courses in "IT Bullshitting". Expert bullshitters usually get the job IMO. I just lack functioning BS gene. The few times I tried to bullshit I tripped over myself.

      Bullshitting is an essential skill these days, and many of us lack it. (Bad slashdot humor does not count because it targets geeks, not suits.)

  10. Perfect Timing by oddjob · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm getting laid off today...

    1. Re:Perfect Timing by Laplace · · Score: 4, Funny

      Poor guy. You probably aren't going to get laid either.

      --
      The middle mind speaks!
    2. Re:Perfect Timing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but he wont get laid because he is ugly....not because of his resume

  11. Don't lie... by famazza · · Score: 2

    ... unless you're looking for a job as a lawyer or at the sales department.

    Don't forget, you must lie and the employer must believe, right before the end of the interview you tell that you've lied in your resume and all over the interview.

    The job will be yours. For sure.

    --

    -=-=-=-=
    I know life isn't fair, but why can't it ever be un-fair in MY favor!?
    1. Re:Don't lie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know youre joking, but re: the lawyer comment -- if you were a lawyer or law student and lied on your résumé and then told the interviewer about it, you certainly wouldnt get the job, you probably wouldnt be able to get a job anywhere else, -and- if they reported you to the local bar association, you wouldnt be able to practice in the state -- you wouldnt pass the fitness of moral character test.

  12. Resume or CV ? [Slightly OT] by smak · · Score: 1



    What exactly is the difference between a Resume and a CV ?

    --
    b0rk!

    1. Re:Resume or CV ? [Slightly OT] by boxless · · Score: 0

      Not much. Though it seems that people in academia use CV more. I think technically there's a difference. One's supposed to have certain kind of information (chronologically as opposed to skills-based). I can't remember which, though.
      I've always used them interchangeably.

    2. Re:Resume or CV ? [Slightly OT] by mccalli · · Score: 1
      What exactly is the difference between a Resume and a CV ?

      I thought the phrases were interchangeable, with resume being a US term and CV being British.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    3. Re:Resume or CV ? [Slightly OT] by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      A CV (Curriculum Vitae) is much more detailed -- as the name would imply, it lists the curriculum of your life. Depending on the country, they range from a few (Ireland) to many (Germany)pages, including hobbies, personal information, all schools attended and exams taken since kindergarten, etc.

    4. Re:Resume or CV ? [Slightly OT] by thona · · Score: 1

      CV = Curriculum Vitae.

      Now, forthe ignorant poster before me - that is not british, that is latin.

    5. Re:Resume or CV ? [Slightly OT] by cperciva · · Score: 2

      What exactly is the difference between a Resume and a CV ?

      CV == Curriculum Vitae; generally it includes more emphasis on academics and less on positions held.

      But the two terms are used more or less interchangeably now, so (modulo the usual rules about customizing your resume to the job) you can generally just use the same sheet regardless of which they ask for.

    6. Re:Resume or CV ? [Slightly OT] by tshoppa · · Score: 2
      In the US, at least:
      • A Resume is a short (one or two page) attempt to sell yourself to HR
      • A CV is a detailed description of your experience (notably published papers in academia, but in the software world it would likely list packages you wrote or groups you worked in)
    7. Re:Resume or CV ? [Slightly OT] by mccalli · · Score: 1
      Now, forthe ignorant poster before me - that is not british, that is latin.

      Err...the ignorant poster before you, ie. me, is British. I meant that the British use the term CV where the US uses the term resume.

      'British' is not a language, even if you use a small b...

      Cheers,
      Ian

    8. Re:Resume or CV ? [Slightly OT] by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2

      What exactly is the difference between a Resume and a CV ?

      Academics have CV's and are generally paid half what their non-academic counterparts with resumes are.

  13. Resume Building by thomas57 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm currently building my resume, and as a App Developer it is tempting to lists all the projects I worked on. In my case diversity was the thinking. To counter the overload of projects, I instead listed just the most complex projects, and also listed the other roles that I had played at the company. Uber g33k? Yeah but, I don't have to sound like one all the time.

    1. Re:Resume Building by jmccay · · Score: 2

      You could also build a portfolios of projects with code samples, design details, explanations, etc. Keep it in a binder, and on your resume or cover letter, list that you have a portfolio available for review during an interview of past projects. You can list them in order of complexity or subject.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    2. Re:Resume Building by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That might be a problem with employers. Unless it was all open source software, a previous employer wouldn't like you showing a project design to others. It might even be enough to cause a lawsuit if wind gets back to them.

      A potential employer might think that if he hired you, you would show too many details of your work there to future employers.

  14. job postings on Mojolin are picking up as well by dxnxax · · Score: 1

    There's been a nice kick in the number of linux jobs being posted on Mojolin (http://mojolin.com) I'm waiting for the right one to be posted for a sysadmin position in the carribean!

  15. Mirror of article by LRandomfactor · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:Mirror of article by technomom · · Score: 1

      "Utilize" is by far the most overused word in (American) English. Makes my skin crawl when I see it in any kind of writing where "use" would suffice. Same goes for "due to the fact that". Ever hear of "because"? I see resumes with those words on them, they're headed for the trash.

      JoAnn

  16. Things I've Noticed... by bytesmythe · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I have switched jobs a couple of times recently. I've noticed a couple of things that have changed since I first started job hunting.

    First of all, it is no longer sufficient to simply mention that you are a programmer. It isn't even sufficient to mention that you know C++. I've seen requirements that specifically want 2+ years of experience using Visual Studio. This is the most idiotic thing I've ever seen, but that doesn't stop companies from putting that in the job description. And we all know how HR departments are. If you don't have exactly what they're looking for, you don't get called back.

    Another thing is the certification hang-up. I've known people with certifications that don't know sh*t, but that won't stop them from getting a job before me, because I don't have any certifications. Hiring managers (particularly those who are non-technical) are fooled into believing that certifications somehow equate to a higher quality employee. It doesn't matter that this isn't true; it can easily keep you from getting a job.

    Thirdly, the "Jack of All Trades" background is getting harder to place. Employers want someone with large (sometimes unreasonably so) amounts of experience in particular (sometimes obscure) areas. It used to be that having a generic background was a good thing. It meant you could easily adapt to new technologies, and had a wide range of experience to draw on for coming up with novel solutions to problems. Nowadays, employers don't want you to solve anything. They want to purchase a solution-in-a-box and hire a technician (not really a programmer) to implement it. Finally, employers are looking for more on your resume than "I wrote some software". They want to see how you drastically reduced the running time, or saved a bunch of money, or lead a team on to beat a tight deadline, save money, and make the manager look like a champion. Remember: they aren't hiring you to just get a job done. They are hiring you so that they can pad their own resumes with accomplishments that you pulled off. So, make sure that the things on your resume support what your potential manager would want on his resume.

    After all this, I would like to mention that I am starting to feel burned out, and am looking towards getting back into academia. I'd rather do research than spend the rest of my life feeling like a corporate flunky.

    --
    bytesmythe
    Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
    -- Scott Meyer
    1. Re:Things I've Noticed... by dazdaz · · Score: 1

      I should firstly state that I am in no way racist, however a lot of Asian recruiters are extremely unfair in their job requirements. We could start a competition for the most unfair job requirements because it'd cause a few people to wake up.

      There is also a huge age bias for Eastern positions, 99% of them would be illegal in the West.

    2. Re:Things I've Noticed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely agree with your points. The bigger the company, the more inane the hiring procedures.

      Find a small company and you'll be valued more.

      When my company hires, we only have a passing interest about what's on your resume. We give a language-independant skills test which helps separate the wheat from the chaff remarkably quickly.

      It's amazing the number of PhD's and other certified big-talkers that aren't worth a damn.

    3. Re:Things I've Noticed... by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      "I've seen requirements that specifically want 2+ years of experience using Visual Studio"

      Yeah, but you haven't seen requirements asking for 5 years of experince in Office 2000 have you?

      Just wait. It can only get more ridiculous!

    4. Re:Things I've Noticed... by Vantage13 · · Score: 1

      it saddens me to say that i've seen "3-5 years experience windows 2000 required..." *shakes head*

  17. I solved my resume woes by back_pages · · Score: 5, Insightful
    by deciding to go to grad school. I'm in my early 20s, with no meaningful work experience in the field, competing with droves of laid off, older, more experienced workers. Even if I find an entry-level position, then I have to compete with everybody else who graduated last May. It's vicious.

    I'm not asking for much. I just want a chance to live at least as well as I did with no income at college (meaning: don't starve, basic cable, internet, and shelter), not default on my loans, and most importantly to me gain experience toward building a better career. I'm looking for an opportunity, not compensation.

    Screw the job market. I'm going back to the college life, late nights, late mornings, parties, beautiful women everywhere, lots of beer, and no drug tests. In a few years, I'll have at least a Master's, but that's only if I completely fail to achieve a PhD. Screw the job market. Screw the job market. Stay in school. A teaching assistantship + college lifestyle if far superior and better for your future than developing an ulcer at 23 trying to get an entry level job.

    1. Re:I solved my resume woes by SuperMario666 · · Score: 1

      Same plan here - that is, hang out in grad school until the economy improves.

      I'll have a Computer Science degree with a stellar GPA, but companies just don't seem to give a rat's ass. It almost seems as if I'd be in better shape right now if I'd just spent the past 4 years acquiring work experience.

      However, I haven't decided if I should go for a Masters in CS or try something different like an MBA or JD. Any suggestions?

    2. Re:I solved my resume woes by tree_frog · · Score: 1

      Slight problem - I already have a PhD.

      Is an MBA the answer ??

      reefrog.

    3. Re:I solved my resume woes by Pathetic+Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Go for the MBA. You want to be the person that fires people, outsources jobs, and can get hired elsewhere for more money after you've run your company into bankruptcy.

    4. Re:I solved my resume woes by Pathetic+Coward · · Score: 2

      MBA or law degree. If you have a PhD in science or engineering, you can go into patent law or consulting - where the big bucks are.

    5. Re:I solved my resume woes by simong_oz · · Score: 1

      If you have a PhD in science or engineering ... where the big bucks are.

      hahahahahahahahahahahaha ;)

      --
      "Because it's there." - George Mallory, when asked why he wanted to climb Mt Everest, March 18, 1923 (New York Times)
    6. Re:I solved my resume woes by bdr1 · · Score: 1

      unless you plan to stay in academia, which probably isn't without stress, some point you'll have to give up on the big rock candy mountain and return to the real world.

      What makes you think it will be any easier with an advanced degree and no experience outside of "late nights, late mornings, beautiful women everywhere, lots of beer and no drug tests"?

      My guess is you'll be one of many applicants who chose this great escape, as many of my friends did in the early 90s (that was during the first Bush recession and those friends are all professors now, sweating about tenure and publication).

    7. Re:I solved my resume woes by iandunn · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You might want to read this first.

    8. Re:I solved my resume woes by DLWormwood · · Score: 1
      You mis-summarized. What he actually said, correctly summarized...

      MBA or law degree... where the big bucks are.

      Which is true, sadly.

      --
      Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
    9. Re:I solved my resume woes by helix_r · · Score: 1


      Yep,

      Thats what I did in the early 90's: undergrad followed by a completely unstructured 2 years as a slacker, followed by many years in grad school. Grad school was a great experience, and I was able to land nice jobs afterwords (in a field almost completely un-related to what I studied).

      Follow your bliss!
      -- who said that?

    10. Re:I solved my resume woes by gid-goo · · Score: 1

      Do not go for an MBA. They are essentially worthless. Unless you go to a top 5 school there is a glut of meaningless MBAs. The only real benefit of the MBA is the networking potential. And then its only meaningful if you go to one of the top business schools.

  18. Hobbies... by Tim12s · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Slashdot Reader" is probably a bad thing to put on your CV as a "hobby". I'd imagine (...whistle... makes sure boss aint around...) that alot of people spend alot of time on slashdot.

    "Slashdot Poster" is probably a v.bad thing to put on your CV... unless you've got alot of karma.

    Indicating your Slashdot Karma level on your CV (Character Recordsheet) is probably a good thing... but this also implies Slashdot poster... which is a good thing... but it implies that you're a slashdot reader... so you're buggered.

    I'll probably get modded down as flamebait for this. Have at ye fowl moderator.

    1. Re:Hobbies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a "fowl moderator"??

      Is that like a "pheasant plucker"??

  19. I disagree by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    DO NOT put an "Objective" section at the top of your resume, they're all bullshit, never relevant and only limiting, and when you hand someone your resume, your objective is simple - TO GET A JOB FROM THEM.

    Put an Objective on there--but make it relevant to your career search. Do you want a long-term job that will last you to retirement? Do your plans only focus on the short-term now? Do you want a part-time job to support you while you go to school?

    I'd recommend a general objective, instead of customization per company. Use the cover letter for that--to display your interest in and knowledge of the company. Your resume should be static, so it feels honest and trustworthy, and they don't think that they're lying.

    (So call Apple or MS or Be or whomever "the greatest" in the cover letter, not the resume...)

    Oh, and keeping it consice sounds good to. One page is a good limit for a physical resume; if there's extraneous stuff (education breakdown, career breakdown, hobbies) that are relevant but not essential, pt them on the back or leave them out.

    1. Re:I disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "...if there's extraneous stuff (education breakdown, career breakdown, hobbies) that are relevant but not essential, pt them on the back or leave them out."

      Career breakdown? Is that explaining why you got fired from your last job? ;)

    2. Re:I disagree by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 2

      you are really, really, really mistaken on every point you've made.

      The objective section is totally useless, and takes up the most valuable resume real-estate with bullshit that tells nothing to your potential employer. NOTHING.

      as for customization, if your a geek, and applying for a network heavy job, wouldnt you want to emphasize those skills, as opposed to your SQL skills?

      as for the old "resume only takes up one page rule", that is only true for your FIRST resume - our college one, where you dont have anything worthwhile to put on it.

      if you've been working for any amount of time, you sure as hell better have more than one page work of "experiences" and job-related skills.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    3. Re:I disagree by daoine · · Score: 2
      I'd recommend a general objective, instead of customization per company. Use the cover letter for that

      I'm not quite sure how relevant this is in today's market -- if you are sending in a resume electronically or submitting via a career fair, cover letters are generally not accepted. Period. In these situations, if you have expectations of the type of job you want, it's important to use part of the resume to tell the recruiter/company exactly what you're looking for.

    4. Re:I disagree by Mandomania · · Score: 1

      I've had to review my share of resumes in the past and they mostly seem to fall into two distinct groups: Multi-page snooze-fests (invariably with a LONG objective section full of buzzwords), and one pagers (no objective section).

      We ALWAYS spend more time on the one pagers.

      --
      Mando

    5. Re:I disagree by DohDamit · · Score: 2

      I agree some, I disagree some.

      The objective is the first thing the HR department reads. Put HR friendly stuff here.

      Last time I looked for a job(two years ago) I had three resumes: DBA focus, Developer focus, general focus. I would send the one I felt best addressed the position for which I was applying.

      AMEN BROTHER. If you have a one page resume and you've been working for five years, either you've had one job, or you have wasted your time.

      Truth told, the resume won't make a huge difference. Really, there's two questions for any interviewee.

      1. Will you work well with my other employees? I won't hire a troublemaker with an attitude.

      2. Will you be able to do the job right within a reasonable amount of time?

      IF you can help someone arrive at either of these answers BEFORE the interview with content in your resume, then THAT is what you put in there.

    6. Re:I disagree by forevermore · · Score: 1
      I'd recommend a general objective, instead of customization per company. Use the cover letter for that

      Actually, use the cover letter for ALL of that. I've been told by numerous career counselors at GOOD universities to never, EVER put an objective on your resume. Granted, it MIGHT help, but the changes (and they are good chances) that it WON'T far outweigh any help you might get. And has been stated in another comment, you've just wasted valuable skill-listing space with a comment that doesn't do more than say that you want a rewarding job to challenge and enhance your skills - um, EVERYONE wants that, and employers know it. Unless it's some incredibly-well-written objective, it'll just end up making you look inexperienced.

      Use your cover letter to explain what kind of job you're looking for, or expand on specific uses of your skills that might have been too lengthy to put in your resume - and if THOSE get too long, cut them and save them for the interview.

      --
      Do you really need reason for beer? Wingman Brewers
    7. Re:I disagree by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > The objective section is totally useless, and takes up the most valuable resume real-estate with bullshit that tells nothing to your potential employer. NOTHING.
      >
      > as for customization, if your a geek, and applying for a network heavy job, wouldnt you want to emphasize those skills, as opposed to your SQL skills?

      You're both missing the point of the "Objectives:" section.

      In the example you cited, your "Objective" is "To work on networks in a $BUZZ1 company in the $BUZZ2 industry."

      $BUZZ1 should be an adjective taken from the company's mission statement or some other such fluff. $BUZZ2 should be the company's industry.

      If it's a behemoth like Intel or Microsoft, you can do one better, by aiming for the department to which you're applying.

      Suppose you're a router geek and you're replying to a position in the Windows Media Player 12 group. That leads to "To work on network optimization and design and cryptographic authentication with a leading company in the field of rights-enabled streaming media."

      It doesn't matter that WMP12 is 2% of the revenue MSFT gets from Office 2008 - what matters is that your resume comes across the desk of the HR drone whose boss is convinced that streaming media, crippled with DRM, is the wave of the fy00t0re, and that you're interested in his pet project.

      The HR drone will see the buzzwords her boss raves about, pass the resume to the boss, the boss will say "Gee, this guy doesn't just want a job, he wants this job. Bring him in for an interview and see if he actually knows what he's talking about."

      Bonus points if you have prior experience in the field (e.g. Real, LiquidAudio, MP3.com, somelivepr0ndotcomnobodyeverheardof.com) of course. But even if you don't, if you manage to get your foot in the door (telephone interview), you can talk about how you were bored writing accounting applications for some third-rate company and how the problems you had getting live streams of stock quotes through some ODBC app were pretty much the same problems you'd seen when you started throwing streams of MP3z around your home LAN, and that you saturated it when you tried sending DiVX movies around... and how you thought it might be more fun to get paid to solve these sorts of problems than the sorts of problems you used to be getting paid to solve.

      What you do at the interview is up to you. Hey, this thread was about how to get your foot in the door :)

    8. Re:I disagree by 2short · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. A good cover letter, telling me why you want the specific job you're applying for is the best thing you can do, hands-down. Unfortunately, in some cases (particularly when the incoming resume stack is five-miles tall) cover letters get ditched. So my advice is that in addition to a good coverletter, you should include an objective, and make it a two-line cover letter. i.e. customize it every time, and tell me why this job is particularly well suited to your goals. A general (boilerplate) objective is crap. (Well, crap to you, gold to me - I can trash your resume in minimum time!)

  20. Ecomomy is speeding up ! by uberstool · · Score: 1

    Up is reference to speed, not direction

    If you don't believe me, have a peek at drudgereport?

    http://www.drudgereport.com/

  21. LIE, and LIE liberally! by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 4, Funny

    Want to look good to the idiots in HR? LIE. And I mean LIE. I've seen H1Bs and absolute total slackers (high-school dropouts, even) do it for years, and they get some pretty cushy jobs.

    Do you have more years experience in a language/program than it existed? Yes, you do have 9 years of Java experience and 550,000 lines of code written, 15 years of HTML, 4 years of Windows 2000 Professional, etc.

    Did you never graduate, or even go to college? No problem -- just put on your resume that you graduated with a BS in CS from RIT, Georgia Tech, or whereever.

    Lie liberally -- the companies hardly check anything unless you're going to be CTO or something, and if they do find out you're lying, it's not like you're going to get arrested; simply move on until you find a company that buys it.

    1. Re:LIE, and LIE liberally! by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2

      very true. I screwed myself out of some money by being honest about my lack of college degree. They're not going to pay any attention.

      Lie like a bastard and suck down corporate funds. They'll screw you any chance they get, so you should screw them also.

    2. Re:LIE, and LIE liberally! by paitre · · Score: 2

      CHRIST!

      This is utter bullshit.
      Fact of the matter is, if you don't have a degree, you -better- be able to show a damned good reason why.

      I've applied for jobs that require an MS in CE, and -gotten- them. I don't have a degree. What I -do- have are provable skills in the required areas.

      And screwing a company just because they'll screw you isn't the right attitude...oh, wait, you're a slacker who'd rather bitch and whine than actually develop the skills that companies actually want...

    3. Re:LIE, and LIE liberally! by Skater · · Score: 1

      Funny you mention GA Tech--it worked so well for George O'Leary...

    4. Re:LIE, and LIE liberally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This is sadly true. If you want a job, your resume must proudly wear your bullshit. And when you go for your interview, be at least somewhat well versed in the bullshit from your resume. Smile alot and make eye contact. Also if you look nice when you go to an interview the interviewer is usually more concerned by how you look than what you know. SHAVE!, or if you don't you better have a well groomed beard or goatee even. Get a haircut three days before the interview, so that it looks fresh, but not like you got all fixed up JUST for the interview. And go and buy some new clothes, or have what you plan to wear dry cleaned and well pressed.

      If you see a secretary, be sure to make small talk with her and be nice and flirt a little even. Make sure she remembers your name and resume. She will be the one calling your references. If you impress her, she won't give her boss a bad report on you.

      When you shake your interviewer's hand, be sure to do so firmly. Ladies should not present their hand with the palm to the floor as they sometimes do. If you are a man shaking a womans hand and she does this, turn her hand vertical. Try to avoid clasping the hand with your other hand. This is a controlling posture, and not what you are going for since you are the one seeking a job.

      There are hundreds of little things you can do to land a job. Just remember that it's usually more about your presentation than the substance of who you are and what you know. If you project an image of excellence, you will be perceived that way.

    5. Re:LIE, and LIE liberally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. I was once asked "Do you know C?" on an interview, to which I answered, "No, but I can learn it." Rejected. The next interview same question. Answered "Yes." Got a second interview. Read "Learn C in 21 Days." Aced the second interview (with written C test). Got the job.

    6. Re:LIE, and LIE liberally! by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2

      I've got the skills, prick. But without claiming to have the paper they think I'm lying. So fuck them. They can think I have the paper, and then I'll take what I need and go on. This is just my day job anyway.

    7. Re:LIE, and LIE liberally! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I've got it!

      Put a lipstick lip-print on your resume and word it like you are a sexy babe.

      That will at least get you a first interview. Just make it sound like a clerical error on their part and then give them your real resume once in.

      Gotta be creative in desparate times.

      I should drop by a spy store and see what they got. Maybe the ol' microphone trick where a group of experts can give you instant remote answers to every Oracle and C++ question they can toss at you. Out of work geek friends can work together using the microphone trick to play round-robbin with their various skills. Thats how the Lone Gunmen would do it. Just gotta find a VW bus now.

      Or bug their office with a mic and see what questions they ask others. Hide the mic in a resume? Nahw, too expensive.

    8. Re:LIE, and LIE liberally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      As someone who actually _has_ a BS in CS from RIT, I suggest you find a more impressive lie...

    9. Re:LIE, and LIE liberally! by ccgr · · Score: 1

      I would not risk my job on it. Many companies do backrgound checks before hiring someone. I imagine they verify academic records as well. Not to mention the fact that some companies want to see pay stubs to make sure you are not inflating your salary claim. Becareful, if you read the small writing on job apps you sign stating the information you provide is accurate to the best of your knowledge.

      --
      http://www.bookforce.net
    10. Re:LIE, and LIE liberally! by GLX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is wholly untrue and horrid advice.

      We've advanced offers to *TWO* people for the same Cisco Engineer job and BOTH were rescinded, one for lying about having a degree ("Well, I went for three years, I thought I could list it as a degree") and another about time-frames on resumes versus what time frames his references gave.

      The worst thing you want is for something to look the slightest bit suspicious - in a tight job market that's a straight trip to the trashcan.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    11. Re:LIE, and LIE liberally! by DavidYaw · · Score: 1

      Want to look good to the idiots in HR? LIE. And I mean LIE.
      ...
      ...just put on your resume that you graduated with a BS in CS from RIT


      That may get you the job, but it'll get you fired when they find out... About two years ago (I would link to RIT's Reporter Magazine, but their archives don't go back very far), one of the professors here was discovered to have lied on his resume. He had been here for the better part of a decade, and was definitely one of the better professors. He was let go, for that simple reason that he lied. As a result, he now has either a big gaping hole in his resume, or an almost-worthless reference.

      -- David Yaw: Proud graduate of RIT with a Batchelor's in Computer Science

    12. Re:LIE, and LIE liberally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I went for three years, I thought I could list it as a degree")

      How dumb can you be?

    13. Re:LIE, and LIE liberally! by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      Not to mention the fact that some companies want to see pay stubs to make sure you are not inflating your salary claim.

      What? If they want to see my paystubs to verify I'm not inflating my salary claim, I want to see THEIR paystub to make sure they're not underpaying me. To heck with that.

      Truth is, I never ever disclose my salary history. That's completely irrelevant. Let's talk about the job you want me to do, how much I'm willing to accept, and whether that's acceptable to you. If I'm comfortable with the number and the company is comfortable with the number, my salary history is completely irrelevant.

      The only reason they want salary history is to know exactly how much they can get away with offering you. That's BS. If they ask for that information, just put "N/A". If they don't call you back because you didn't give them that information, GOOD. It's not a company you want to work for. If they call you anyway then it is clear they don't really care and are willing to talk to you anyway. That tells you they are really interested in you.

    14. Re:LIE, and LIE liberally! by bluGill · · Score: 2

      I know ALL programing languges, including the ones that have not been invented yet. (Barring the silver bullet that Fred Brooks is still correct about being unlikely) Any good programer can learn a language in at most a few days. It can take months or years to years to learn all the little details of the various libraries, but you will quickly pick up the important ones, and over time learn the rest. A programer with one month of expirence has either passed the learning curve (doesn't know everyting, but knows most of the details) or never will pass the curve.

    15. Re:LIE, and LIE liberally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you meant it was redundant, dumbass

    16. Re:LIE, and LIE liberally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      F*** off, jerk!

      If it's a choice between food for my kids and lying, I hope I'll have the courage to lie!

    17. Re:LIE, and LIE liberally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter if they check or not.

      It's just like getting a date. If the first one rejects you, just move on to the next.

      In my experience, they mostly judge you on your appearance. Go with the "nerdy professional" and they'll think you are too naive to lie on your resume.

  22. laid off by stud9920 · · Score: 0, Funny
    but I freshened up MY resume because I got laid off
    As geeks, we slashdot readers must congratulate you. You got laid ! I mean, wow ! Most of us didn't ever even get to first base. But come on, the guy who's going to interview you for a geek job is probably a geek himself. You don't want to make him feel inferior, do you. If I were you, I would remove the line :
    • I got laid
    from my resume.

    Oops, you said "laid off". Never mind.
    1. Re:laid off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cmdr Taco Laid your sorry ass!!!! Faggot.

      Hemos.

  23. jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why does steve jobs need tips on resumes. I thought apple was doing well?

  24. Resumes by deanj · · Score: 1

    Make it one page. More than one page will be ignored (or worse, laughed at...I once saw a ten page resume)

    Leave off the "Objective". It's meaningless. Tell the people what your objective is once you get the interview.

    List projects you've done. This speaks VOLUMES more about what you can do than a list of classes, or positions you've held at companies.

    And never, EVER lie. You will be caught.

    1. Re:Resumes by paitre · · Score: 2
      List projects you've done. This speaks VOLUMES more about what you can do than a list of classes, or positions you've held at companies.
      -AMEN-. My resume is three pages (shut up), but a significant portion of the second page is my currect position, and all the projects I've 1. managed, 2. did solo, 3. did in my down time and then released to the company.

      I have some 30 lines -just- for my current job.

      And never, EVER lie. You will be caught.
      Amen to this one, too. You never know how many of your references will be called, and you also never know how thorough a background check your prospective employer may do, either. -Especially- if you're looking at a University job, or something with the feds.
      One more thing: In addition to not lying, -don't- sell yourself as having skills that you don't really have. You want to get bitten? Get a job based on having Java skills, and then have to write a 10k line application in 3-6 months. Good Luck.

    2. Re:Resumes by AppyPappy · · Score: 2

      If you are over 30, you should have a two page resume. If you can only fill a one pager after 8 years in the real world, you will probably not get a sniff.

      I work in Personnel and I hate little bitty ass fonts. It doesn't have to be special ed but I should be able to use it.

      Find a unique font that looks cool.

      It's the 21st century. Make it unique. Add a picture.

      Aw screw it. You will be pasting into a memo field on a website anyway. Who cares what it looks like.

      --

      If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

  25. Resume tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yes, and I imagine Commander Taco and all the staff of slashdot are keenly interested in how to poof up their resumes. Oh, I'm sure somehow they'll be able to spin the appalling dung heap of slashdot into something that sounds like the technological achievement of the century.

    Anyway, I mean, since slashdot is about to go out of business and all, I bet our esteemed "editors" are sweating bullets. That's what I heard, anyway...ooops sorry hope I didn't say too much.

  26. job postings on Mojolin are picking up as well... by dxnxax · · Score: 1

    There's been a nice kick in the number of linux jobs being posted on Mojolin (http://mojolin.com) I'm waiting for the right one to be posted for a sysadmin position in the carribean!

  27. Change the tense (etc) of every line... by floydigus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...so that it sounds like an achievement.

    e.g. Was a member of a team that selected a new problem management tool

    becomes

    Selected a new problem management tool

    Do this on every line and use bullet points.

    BYU

    --

    All things in moderation; including moderation

    1. Re:Change the tense (etc) of every line... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean change the voice of every line. You didn't change the tense in your example--you changed from passive to active voice

  28. Spell Checker & Presentation by silversurf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't tell you how many resume's we see that have *gross* spelling errors or serious grammar issues. Plus, we get a ton of resume's without cover letters. I know some companies don't require this, but when you read that a job description says "send resume and cover letter to..." then it's a good idea to include it.

    People aren't handing jobs out anymore and there's alot of competition for them now, even for really qualified and experienced people, so that means you have to compete for the job, which also means you have to actually put effort in to getting it.

    We just filled a sys admin job where we interviewed almost 30 candidates. We actually had guys showing up in shorts, torn jeans and t-shirts. I mean come on folks, even though many west coast jobs aren't "tie required" most employers like to see candidates who look presentable.

    Just check your work. If you don't care about the job you're applying for, don't waste everyone's time.

    -s

    1. Re:Spell Checker & Presentation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We actually had guys showing up in shorts, torn jeans and t-shirts.

      What kind of idiot turns up in shorts AND torn jeans?? Do they have no pride??

    2. Re:Spell Checker & Presentation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I can't tell you how many resume's we see that have *gross* spelling errors or serious grammar issues.

      Does that include not knowing how to construct the plurals of words that end in vowels?

      (Hint: it doesn't involve apostrophes (not apostrophe's))

    3. Re:Spell Checker & Presentation by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can't tell you how many resume's [sic] we see that have *gross* spelling errors or serious grammar issues.

      Plus, we get a ton of resume's [sic] without cover letters.

      People aren't handing jobs out anymore and there's alot [sic] of competition for them now, even for really qualified and experienced people, so that means you have to compete for the job, which also means you have to actually put effort in to [sic] getting it.

      Is this supposed to be humorous, or are you just a manager?

    4. Re:Spell Checker & Presentation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, we get a ton of resume's without cover letters.

      Probably because there's no place out there with "cover letter tips for jobs." I mean what the hell is a cover letter supposed to say anyway?

    5. Re:Spell Checker & Presentation by L0neW0lf · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are a TON of sites that give cover letter advice. http://www.about.com has plenty. The body of a cover letter should go like this: Dear (get the NAME of someone, don't write HR Manager unless they tell you to), I am writing to inquire about the recent position for a (job title) listed in your advertisement (list where advertised). I am seeking new employment and this position seems a perfect match. I am currently (list college attendance, or "working as a (job position)"). I have xx years experience and am skilled in (plug your skills here). Feel free to contact the technical references listed in my resume'. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, (your name) A cover letter makes you different from those around you who weren't willing to go the extra mile. It's like wearing a tie and slacks to an interview, even if you're not big on dress clothes. When 50 people are interviewing for a job, make sure you do everything possible to make sure you're not one of the 49 who doesn't get it.

      --

      Never look down your nose at others. Someday, someone is bound to see your boogers.
    6. Re:Spell Checker & Presentation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First paragraph: In the first sentence, "resume's" should be "resumes". This error is repeated in the second sentence.

      Second paragraph: In the first sentence, "alot" should be "a lot".

      Fourth paragraph: "Just check your work." A worthwile observation, indeed.

    7. Re:Spell Checker & Presentation by Matrian · · Score: 1

      Well, he could always be simulating the accent over the e, given he didn't make the same mistake on 'jobs'.

    8. Re:Spell Checker & Presentation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He already has a job, twit. Therefore he can spail and grammer as bad as he fucken wants on slashdot.

    9. Re:Spell Checker & Presentation by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      Sysadmin? Hacker writing style. Don't quote the period, don't capitalise a name, never use italic when you can _underscore_.

    10. Re:Spell Checker & Presentation by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      That's what system administrators look like. You likely passed up some good people due to an idiot fascination with personal appearance. If they wore a suit for the interview, they'd be lying about themselves. I suppose that would make for a more comfortable hire.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    11. Re:Spell Checker & Presentation by philovivero · · Score: 2
      resume's
      Well, he could always be simulating the accent over the e, given he didn't make the same mistake on 'jobs'.
      Wouldn't it then be "re'sume's"?

      I'm never surprised anymore. A complete lack of English-writing skills seems to be more prevalent than ever. The inability to then properly include French words shouldn't surprise.

      I had the unenvious job of having to weed through 30 resumes for some entry-level tech position a few years back. It pained me to see the illiteracy that's rampant in our society.

    12. Re:Spell Checker & Presentation by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

      it is acceptable in certain contexts to use a trailing apostrophe as equivalent to an acute accent. Mariam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary allows all three spellings:

      Main Entry: résumé
      Variant(s): or resume or resumé /'re-z&-"mA, "re-z&-' also 'rA- or "rA-/

      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
    13. Re:Spell Checker & Presentation by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2

      Not to mention the inability to then properly split infinitives. :)

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    14. Re:Spell Checker & Presentation by Bishop923 · · Score: 2

      We actually had guys showing up in shorts, torn jeans and t-shirts.

      This can actually act in the persons favor.

      I was recently hired as a Web application developer/Graphic Artist/whatever for a small but stable company.(read only 8 employees but profitable for the past 6 years...) I came in wearing a t-shirt and shorts, unshaven and with long hair. I looked more/less presentable but not business-like. The guy who hired me was the resident geek and took me thru the typical interview. Later on they emailed me and asked me to come in for a second interview, mentioning that the company had a business-casual dress code. I got a hair cut, shaved, and came in wearing a collared shirt and khakis. They asked a few more questions and they hired me.

      Point of the Story?

      I showed in the first interview that I knew what was needed for the position, and in the second interview I showed that I cared enough about what the company wanted to clean myself up and look "professional". I suppose its kinda in the same vein as "let people assume that you know less than you really do so you can impress them later". :-)

      (In addition I learned that they care more about what I can offer the company than what I look like. Turned out to be a good deal for both of us. Within a week they gave me a raise because I "made a substantial contribution to the company" when they figured it would be several months before I became useful.)

    15. Re:Spell Checker & Presentation by silversurf · · Score: 1

      Ok, so my spelling was the greatest. But, my use of "resume's" was to simulate the accent, not poor english/french.

      My point to everyone was that there are tools out there to creat a presentable cover letter and resume (sorry no accent this time). I abuse my english and I misspell occasionally, but my resume is flawless.

      -s

    16. Re:Spell Checker & Presentation by silversurf · · Score: 1

      Shit, I still can't spell !!! I meant to say, "so my spelling wasn't the greatest"...

      sorry.

  29. 1 Job , 300 Resumes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A couple of weeks ago, I reponded posting on monster. I called the same day it was posted. The recruiter said she already recieved over 300 resume for that one posting? What recovery? Maybe it's time for Goerge W. to stop playing GI Joe and focus on putting *Americans* back to work.

  30. You belong in academia. by rindeee · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    I don't mean that spitefully, but judging from your take on the work world, it seems obvious. You see, what you point out as reasons for critisism, many would point out as simple facts that exist in a professional environment. I personally (from my perspective specifically) do not find it the least bit odd that companies are placing more value on specific skill sets as they need them rather than a "jack of all trades". Of course the person that you will report to wants to hire someone who is going to make them look good. They are judged based on the quality of the staff that they hire. I also have a beef with certification whiners. My take on the topic is simple. I don't go out and get certifications for the sake of getting them. If someone that I am trying to get work from (as a consultant) is looking for a particular cert, then I spend the few hundred bucks, take the stupid tests and get the piece of paper. It's still nothing more than a piece of paper, but it is also a marketing edge. I have found that most of the people who whine about certs being "useless and trivial...no real indicator of skill" are usually afraid to go take the test becuase they are unsure they could pass it. I'm sorry, but if it's so trivial and meaningless and so easy that someone with know real knowledge can get the thing, then go get the cert if that's what the hiring managers want to see. It has nothing to do with being a corporate flunky, it has to do with marketing your self. Short of starting your own business, you will have to work for someone. That being the case, you submit your self to their rules. It's their field, their game, their ball, their money, their equipment, their risk. You may be a hell of a player, but like it or not, the company doesn't live or die at the hands of some whiney prima donna. So, all that being said, I again must agree with you that academia is a fabulous place for you.

    1. Re:You belong in academia. by bytesmythe · · Score: 2
      You are definitely correct that I do belong in academia. I would like to address a couple of things you mentioned, though.

      I personally (from my perspective specifically) do not find it the least bit odd that companies are placing more value on specific skill sets as they need them rather than a "jack of all trades".

      The thing I find odd is that people with highly particular skill sets can be disposable. Also, they don't necessarily have a "programmer mindset". Too many specialists are useless outside of their pet framework. It would seem like having a rich, varied background would be an asset no matter what. The fact that it isn't seems like an indication of shortsightedness, which is something I strongly dislike.

      Of course the person that you will report to wants to hire someone who is going to make them look good.

      I do tend to be cynical, but I didn't actually mean for my point about this to come across that way. I know it should be obvious that a boss will want to hire people that makes him/her look good, but many people don't always realize this. The thing that I find disturbing is not when the employer gets credit for hiring you and being a good manager, but for the work that YOU did. I firmly believe in giving credit where credit is due.

      I have found that most of the people who whine about certs being "useless and trivial...no real indicator of skill" are usually afraid to go take the test becuase they are unsure they could pass it.

      This is definitely not the issue I have. ;) I can probably pass any test I can study for. I'm very good at taking tests. The issue to me, again, is one of shortsightedness. I think that this lack of foresight is one of the roots of the problems in our current economic situation. This is why I am so against certifications. If they were meaningful (so that they could be used in a non-shortsighted manner), I wouldn't have a problem with them at all.

      I have many other points I'd mention, but they become increasingly irrelevent to the discussion, and more particular to my personality quirks and schizophrenic idealism, so I'll just leave it at this. Thanks for your reply. :)

      --
      bytesmythe
      Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
      -- Scott Meyer
    2. Re:You belong in academia. by rindeee · · Score: 1

      Just wanted to comment on one of the points you made in your reply. I absolutely agree that "having a rich, varied background" is an asset. It is a requirement. The trick is to make particular parts of that "rich and varied background" stand on their own in the eyes of the prospective employer. It's not about reality, it's about perception (of course someone said reality is perception, but that's another thread). Nothing wrong with idealism, though they have meds for the schizo part. ;) ER

    3. Re:You belong in academia. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like a degree is worht the paper its printed on either... make Prof happy = Degree. Sit around for 4-5 years and poof your a "professional"... sigh

      cynical yes I am, tired of this debate which is beter degrees or certs try, expirence...\

      Later

    4. Re:You belong in academia. by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 2

      I personally (from my perspective specifically) do not find it the least bit odd that companies are placing more value on specific skill sets as they need them rather than a "jack of all trades".

      I think it makes sense if you don't understand the underlying skills of the position you are hiring for. I am a 23 yr old Jack of All Trades: Operating Systems, Networking, Web Dev, Software Dev, etc. Of course I'm no where near being an expert in all these areas, but I get by well in each.

      At my last position, two others were hired on at the same time. The job required regular VB, COM+, and ASP work. I had virtually no experience in these areas outside of the tiniest bit of ASP. In a few weeks, I was working near peak efficiency. After a few months, some of the expierenced developers were coming to me for help. Within six months, I had contributed to every aspect of our rather complex development system, working in areas of importance that few at the company had ever touched. I never saw this happen with the other new hires.

      Knowing a little bit of everything makes it very easy to learn new skills. If you encounter a new language, you can compare it to the syntax, style, and ideology of languages you already know. As a result, you can learn new tech much faster than a more focussed individual.

      Along the same lines, people I encounter who are not Jack of All Trades often do not even like the computer science field all that much. They chose this profession because it pays well. They learn as much as they have to in order to maintain their paycheck. When it comes down to it though, who is better for a company 6+ months down the road?

      I understand why hiring managers look for the kind of experience they do. Some get hundreds of resumes a day. They can afford to throw out 90% of the applicants. Furthermore, if they are not qualified to review candidates, they can't afford not to throw out 90% of the applicants. They may not get the best people, but in all liklihood, they'll get someone who can do their job.

    5. Re:You belong in academia. by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 2

      I have found that most of the people who whine about certs being "useless and trivial...no real indicator of skill" are usually afraid to go take the test becuase they are unsure they could pass it.

      I agree to a certain point. Back in college, I looked into taking the A+ certification ($100) figuring it might help me land an internship. Looking at sample questions, I knew 60-70% of the answers off the top of my head, the rest could easily be looked up. Looking at the test, I got the impression that no matter how experienced you were, you would have to spend a non trivial amount of time studying for the test. While that's true of any test, not all tests cost hundreds of dollars to take and have a thriving industry of educational materials behind them. It felt like a scam then and it feels like one now.

      That said, I'm starting to look at certs again, not because I believe they are wholly valid, but because I want the marketting value they provide. Of course, the problem then is, which ones and how much? I can work as a Software Developer on any language or platform and could easily fill an entry level Networking/Operations position as well.

  31. Confirmed Observation by LifesABeach · · Score: 1



    The economy speeding up? This only confirms my suspicion, that there is a raving lunatic in the Executive branch.

    1. Re:Confirmed Observation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its amazing that even supposedly intelligent people still believe the executive branch has anything whatsoever to do with the state of the economy.

  32. Resume & job interview tips in german by featherstorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is a shameless advertisment of my bosses free tips on how to get a job in general. If you're looking for a job in Germany, Austria or Switzerland, these tips might be of help to you. Of course you'll have to be able to read german.

    Tipps & Tricks zur erfolgreichen Stellenbewerbung

  33. Economy speeding up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The rate at which the econmy is falling is decreasing, there for, the economy is speeding up.

    1. Re:Economy speeding up by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The rate at which the econmy is falling is decreasing, there for, the economy is speeding up.

      Um, don't put "Calculus" on your resume.

  34. 3 more points by dazdaz · · Score: 1


    This is a very interesting thread, several more points that i'd like to make.

    Firstly, the URL provided above does not work.

    Resumes are more about marketing than your actual ability, the sad truth. It's not what you did, but how you marketed it. Let's face it, most tech people have no clue over marketing including myself and this is why they fail interviews.

    Lastly, it'd be interesting to have a Slashdot interview with a "top company" HR director. The educational value would be very rewarding.

    Regards

  35. Most Resume Advice is Totally Subjective? by weston · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I first wrote a real resume (i.e., not just a high school assignment) about 10 years ago. I spent a lot of time worrying about the format and language. Up until recently, every time I updated it, I assiduously read tips given by job-hunting and other professionals. I spoke with friends who were technical writers and document design specialists. Earlier this year I read a few books on it and asked all my professional friends and a few unprofessional friends and finally, and after much ado the conclusion I came to....

    The advice is often useless.

    Well, not totally useless. But very, very subjective. Some people will tell you to put in an objective. Others will tell you it's irrelevant. Some people will tell you hobbies are irrelevant; others will tell you it shows a holistic person who'll have more to give to a job. Some people will tell you being holistic is important; others will tell you that focus on skills relevant to the job is all that matters. Some people will tell you to use action buzzwords; others will tell you those will get you dismissed as a charlatan. You get the idea.

    My guess is they're all correct. Resume design is an art, not a science. Every person looking at your resume is looking for different things from a slightly different perspective. I've come to the conclusion that there's no set of tips you can follow to get you a resume that will get you in the door. You just have to design and refine as professionally as possible, think a little bit about your audience, and hope the message you intended to send gets across.

    And sometimes I think that your own judgement may be as important as someone else's. If you walk into an interview with a resume you are confident in, that's a good precursor to success.

    This is the result of my thinking. Feel free to send/post critiques of the thing. Or job offers, for that matter.

    1. Re:Most Resume Advice is Totally Subjective? by Deton8 · · Score: 1

      You have a BS degree. That ought to be in the first third of your resume. As somebody who has to sift through resumes from time to time, I can tell you that my immediate feeling was that you were covering up not having a degree by listing all sorts of stuff, and I almost didn't read all the way down. I also would be highly skeptical of anybody who claimed as many programming/apps skills as you do -- unless you are totally hardcore, you are not current in more than a few of these skills, and maybe never were expert in most of them. Not picking on you especially, but in my experience I find that people who list tons of app and programming languages have either taken a college taster course in them (useless to me) or have had so many jobs each of which was different (jack of all trades master of none). My suggestion would be to make it clear which ones you are expert in (i.e. if you are a c++ coder, I expect to stick you in front of a PC and have you emitting quality code in the first week); and maybe list all the others as "have also used dBase II, Algol, Fortran 77, Windows 3.11, and 6502 assembly language". If you are a mega-geek and actually remember all the commands of SAS and Prolog, then I'd suggest you come up with a way to make me believe it. On the plus side, I think your resume is FAR more readable than 90% of the crapola which crosses my desk.

    2. Re:Most Resume Advice is Totally Subjective? by ChadAmberg · · Score: 1

      You have an AOL email account. When I sort resumes, they'd go right in the trash with the first round of rejections. Might as well write your resume with crayon.

    3. Re:Most Resume Advice is Totally Subjective? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      You have an AOL email account. When I sort resumes, they'd go right in the trash with the first round of rejections. Might as well write your resume with crayon.

      On the flip-side, it might mean they actually have people skills because AOL is more likely to have real people to chat with that reflect a typical workspace.

      I tend to agree with the 'subjective' comment. The people reading resumes are as diverse as those who send them.

      Note: I don't have AOL.

    4. Re:Most Resume Advice is Totally Subjective? by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 2

      My one bit of advice (and this is not meant in any way to offend):
      drop the bit about Missionary work. Unfortunately, there are a lot of people out there who simply do not like mormons. There are a lot of self-righteous people of other Christian denominations who consider it a cult. There are a lot of people who are going to stereotype and infer that a) mormons have lots of kids, so b) this guy is going to cost us a lot of insurance money and c) ask for a lot of time off.

      It doesn't matter if you aren't even married. It doesn't matter that there are laws in this country that prevent an interviewer from asking you about your religion or marital status or from discriminating against you because of those points. You just set it out in broad dayliht, right in front of them. Even if an interviewer isn't the sort that would actively discriminate against someone, that interviewer may have some of those nagging stereotypes in the back of their mind (particularly if they live/grew up in an area without a large Mormon population). BYU doesn't always click with people, but Latter-Day Saints almost always does.

      Your resume is strong enough already without that one point. I'd lose it if I were in your position.

    5. Re:Most Resume Advice is Totally Subjective? by Anitra · · Score: 1

      ...I find that people who list tons of app and programming languages have either taken a college taster course in them (useless to me)...

      Ok, I'm in college, so I'm not an expert in ANYTHING. I've got above-average knowledge of DNS, with a smattering of C++ and Perl. What in the world am I supposed to put on my resume, other than my grunt jobs that prove I can work, but none of my (limited) skills?

      --

      Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
    6. Re:Most Resume Advice is Totally Subjective? by weston · · Score: 1

      drop the bit about Missionary work. Unfortunately, there are a lot of people out there who simply do not like mormons. There are a lot of self-righteous people of other Christian denominations who consider it a cult. There are a lot of people who are going to stereotype and infer that a) mormons have lots of kids, so b) this guy is going to cost us a lot of insurance money and c) ask for a lot of time off.

      Hmmmm. I hadn't thought of that... maybe I've been living and working in Utah for too long.

      I didn't have the missionary stuff in for a while. About 8 months ago, I expanded the section on volunteer work from a half-inch side mention to its current half-of-the-back-page glory.... because I'm interested in moving into the NGO/non-profit world, or possibly something with a policy research institute. That's when I threw in the missionary service, figuring it (and the other stuff) would play well with the progressive crowd I'm interested in working with.

      Do Latter-Day Saints really have a foaming-at-mouth fundamentalist image? I've met a number of solidly Baptist who don't like me because I'm a Mormon, and smart people who like to spar over matters of faith and epistemology (which I don't mind), but have generally found that I get along with most educated and/or progressive people... then again, reading a resume is not the same thing as taking the measure of a person by meeting them in person.

      Maybe it would be enough to tell people that I'm single, 30, and don't vote republican?

    7. Re:Most Resume Advice is Totally Subjective? by Drakonian · · Score: 1
      Very insightful. The more seminars I went to, the more critiques I've had of my resume, the more I find that everybody's opinion differs. Go with something you feel good about.

      As for yours, I like it... however I find the background image to be distracting. It might be OK when printed, but on the web it looks like a bit of an eyesore. Just an opinion.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    8. Re:Most Resume Advice is Totally Subjective? by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      General rule of thumb for resumes if to not put anything in that identifies your religion, sex, race, I've even heard age (of course this may be subjective). Some people will just pitch it so they don't have to worry about lawsuits from any federally protected catagory.

    9. Re:Most Resume Advice is Totally Subjective? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said, I couldn't agree more. BTW what version of Maple are you running?

    10. Re:Most Resume Advice is Totally Subjective? by Deton8 · · Score: 1

      re: "You have an AOL email account. When I sort resumes, they'd go right in the trash with the first round of rejections. Might as well write your resume with crayon." Don't be a dork. I have a proper email account at my company. The AOL account is just a convenient spam receptical which I sometimes check for incoming mail.

    11. Re:Most Resume Advice is Totally Subjective? by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 2

      A lot of people just don't like Mormons, like a lot of people don't like Jewish people or Muslims or Catholics. A lot of people are stupid.

      I know some people who are Wiccan, and they just don't bring it up around anyone else. One of the tenets of that religion, in fact, is to sort of operate in secrecy. 9 times out of 10, people get this image of either devil worshipping, idiots who think they can throw fireballs, or wannabe goth kids. In the same respect, a lot of people outside of Utah have a lot of negative views regarding Mormans. Primarily because most Mormons are very faithful to the tenets of their religion, a lot of people do tend to view them as somewhat anachronistic or foaming-at-the-mouth (although I've never met a Mormon who was either).

      Maybe it would be enough to tell people that I'm single, 30, and don't vote republican?
      [joke]Well, that just says to employers, "I'm gay!"[/joke]

    12. Re:Most Resume Advice is Totally Subjective? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I also would be highly skeptical of anybody who claimed as many programming/apps skills as you do -- unless you are totally hardcore, you are not current in more than a few of these skills, and maybe never were expert in most of them. Not picking on you especially, but in my experience I find that people who list tons of app and programming languages have either taken a college taster course in them (useless to me) or have had so many jobs each of which was different (jack of all trades master of none).

      I looked at his list. It is large, but not enormous. It sounds to me like you don't look for well rounded people, rather you look for project-specific coders. Doesn't the fact that a person has exposure to several laguages (etc.), imply to you a person who potentially:

      - is adaptable and flexible and can take on many diverse challenges and can provide "outside of the box" thinking and solutions rather than being blinkered by only having done C++ programming all his life ?

      - understands software development, the science, and that languages are tools, that no one tool is not right for every job and that any tool can be learned as required

      - that multiple programming paradigms exist and that no one is right for all problems

      My suggestion would be to make it clear which ones you are expert in

      No argument there

      (i.e. if you are a c++ coder, I expect to stick you in front of a PC and have you emitting quality code in the first week);

      This seems arrogant and short sighted. If anyone was doing this for me, I'd assume that they are either a genius or didn't take the time to read the spec's and understand the project. Either one is bad.

      maybe list all the others as "have also used dBase II, Algol, Fortran 77, Windows 3.11, and 6502 assembly language".

      Agreed.

      If you are a mega-geek and actually remember all the commands of SAS and Prolog, then I'd suggest you come up with a way to make me believe it.

      Again, you sound arrogant and like you will only accept someone with total recall and see no value in someone who has some good latent abilities that just need refreshing when called upon.

      It sounds like you:

      - run a stifling coding factory
      - would not want multi-talented people working for you for fear they might show you up
      - would be no joy to work for

      I wouldn't want to work for you. I'm sorry, but that's how you come across. Maybe I'm wrong and would find out if I interviewed you (hint).

    13. Re:Most Resume Advice is Totally Subjective? by 2short · · Score: 1

      I'd agree about dropping anything that identifies your religion. Not because I have anything against Mormons, but because anyone who puts their religion on their resume is likely to babble on about it in other irrelevant contexts, which drives me up the wall. I don't care what religion it is. I mean I really, really don't care, and putting it on your resume tells me you're the type who's going to insist I should.

    14. Re:Most Resume Advice is Totally Subjective? by sylvester · · Score: 2


      Of course there's a catch-all tip. There always is. :-) Make your resume about you, but also representative of you. Be honest. If you put value in being holistic, then write down your unrelated hobbies (I do.) If you put value in buzzwords, put down buzzwords. If you're focussed purely on getting money, then read a book about how to make a good resume and follow it.

      -Rob

  36. Learn from others by alen · · Score: 3, Funny

    At my company we run Exchange 5.5 and all resumes are sent to a public folder. We just went through a lay off. So just in case I needed some tips I copied the entire public folder into my personal folders in MS Outlook. You should be able to do the same thing in Lotus Notes or any other email system where resumes are sent to a central location.

  37. My three advices by garoush · · Score: 4, Funny

    My three advices

    Speaking of advices, here are mines:

    1) Advice to IT people: if you can build me a website that can handle a /. effect than make sure you put that down on your resume.

    2) Advice to SAGEWire IT people: your website site needs some tune up.

    3) Advice to Hemos and /. team: next time you may want to send a friendly reminder to the site that is about to be /. so that they can prepare.

    --

    Karma stuck at 50? Add 2-5 inches.. err.. 2-5x Karmas Count to your pen1es.. err.. Karma all naturally and private
  38. Keep in mind the purpose of a resume by Infonaut · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From the hiring party's point of view, a resume is a way of weeding out applicants. If you've ever hired before, you've likely come across this scenario:

    You have 100 applicants for one position. You have limited time to sort through them all. So when you see a resume that has an error in it, or is three pages long, or doesn't speak specifically to the job you're hiring for, you can it immediately, with out even bothering to read it.

    If a job applicant can't even take the time to tailor the resume to the job I'm offering them, then why should I bother reading it? If the applicant doesn't take the time to spellcheck something as critical as a job application, then they probably will miss other important details on the job. Sure, not everyone is a good speller. But everyone has the ability to correct their spelling.

    If a resume has a generic objective statement, it's going in the circular file. Employers want to know that you've actually taken the time to show them in your resume how your goals and your skills match what the company is looking for. You don't have to lie or exaggerate, you just have to articulate your goals and skills in a way that they can understand, given their own organizational leanings.

    One of the best things you can do is to have someone else read your resume. Have a friend who isn't afraid to be critical read it, checking for errors and overall flow. Writing is as much a skill as programming, and if you are a good writer, it's always helpful to have someone check your work.

    Electronic methods are great for employers, because they allow for huge keyword-based searches. But the object here is to get your resume noticed, so that it gets read, so that you get called in for an interview. While the resume is a filtering tool for the hiring company, for you it's sole aim is to land you that critical first interview. From there, it's all about your opportunity to sell yourself, and the resume is practically meaningless.

    So where possible, send a hard copy of your resume, along with a cover letter tailored exactly to the company you're attempting to get a job with. Research the company, show them that you're actually interested in what they're doing. This shows the hiring party that you don't just see this as another potential job out of 500 that you're applying for.

    If you can't send hardcopy, try to use an electronic cover letter (depending on which online resume service you're using, you may or may not be able to do this). The cover letter is helpful because it is seen *before* the resume. In essence, it is your opportunity to intercede and present yourself as a valuable hire, before they even see your qualifications.

    Finally, getting a job through want-ads, either online or off, is the worst way to get hired. It's all about connections - if you know someone at the company, even distantly, attempt to use that connection to obtain an informational interview first. Make a personal connection with someone in the department you'd like to be hired for, and your odds of bypassing the "needle in a haystack" hiring process are much higher.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Keep in mind the purpose of a resume by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      So when you see a resume that has an error in it, or is three pages long, or doesn't speak specifically to the job you're hiring for, you can it immediately, with out [sic] even bothering to read it.

      Guess I should immediately add you to my foe list, because obviously you have nothing of worth to provide ;).

    2. Re:Keep in mind the purpose of a resume by namespan · · Score: 2

      If a job applicant can't even take the time to tailor the resume to the job I'm offering them, then why should I bother reading it?

      Speaking as a person who's been looking since the end of April, I find myself getting very, very tired of customizing even cover letters for a job opportunity. I don't bother with customizing the resume anymore.

      The reasoning is: I can spend 2-4 hours customizing the letter and the resume, and get out two high-quality applications in a day, possibly as much as doubling my chances of getting hired for a specific job -- or I can send out 4-8 times as many resumes, probably quadrupling my chances of getting hired for some job. Given the subjectivity of resume design and cover letter writing, I'm beginning to feel like the superior approach is to play the numbers and send out more applications.

      Don't get me wrong. When I do come across a job I'm really interested in -- like a recent opportunity to webmaster for a senator's office or direct internet communications for a large government aid organization -- I pay attention and customize like crazy. And I'm still not sending out totally form-based cover letters... every one of them gets at least a few minutes of customization, sometimes 30 minutes to and hour.

      But telling people to customize on every job they apply for seems like an exercise in futility.

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    3. Re:Keep in mind the purpose of a resume by Daleks · · Score: 1
      If a job applicant can't even take the time to tailor the resume to the job I'm offering them, then why should I bother reading it?

      Um, because HR is going to reply with at most an automated "Hey! Got your resume!" e-mail. HR is also going to stonewall 99.99% of all phone calls. So why should I take the time to tailor my resume when HR is only going to take the time be rude and ignore me? Oh wait, it's because it's an employer's market and HR can be as demanding and arrogant as they want. Damn, I guess the joke is on me.

      Electronic methods are great for employers, because they allow for huge keyword-based searches. But the object here is to get your resume noticed, so that it gets read, so that you get called in for an interview. While the resume is a filtering tool for the hiring company, for you it's sole aim is to land you that critical first interview. From there, it's all about your opportunity to sell yourself, and the resume is practically meaningless.

      Everyone says to get noticed, but they never say how. Well a friend of mine recently figured it out. Be an ass! Here is an excerpt from a cover letter he sent out recently:

      I saw some of your company's postings online and figured I'd just send my resume to you anyways, even though you probably won't be able to do anything for me. I am a new graduate with a CSSE degree and 15 months working experience, looking for a new job in software engineering. Excuse me for my pessimistic tone and lack of detailed e-mail here, but to be honest I have just become very disenchanted with the entire employment process in general and am very skeptical of the claims of firms such as yours. I hope that I am wrong and that you may be as interested in my services as I would be in yours, but I have just wasted too much time trying to contact firms that feel they have no obligation to reciprocate my time or interest. In any case, have a nice day and I hope to hear from you, but I won't be holding my breath.


      He got an immediate response where the replier said his email was focused and got attention. The replier also said that they didn't have a position for him at the time, but that he had the right attitude to find a job. What attitude? Cynicism? Give me a break.
  39. Network more, be unemployed less by xtal · · Score: 3, Informative

    Something a lot of people out there need to do is build up a solid network of friends and contacts, moreso than anything else. A solid recommendation from someone inside an organization will go farther than anything else; there is more than a grain of truth to the fact that the good jobs never make it to a forum like Monster. Especially so in today's economic climate.

    It's worthwhile to keep business cards. It's worthwhile to go out of your way to socialize with people in your industry. Go to trade meetings when you can. Hell, get involved in some open source projects where you can meet some people.

    Learning to sell yourself is the biggest thing. A resume is part of that, but it's only a part. Unfortunately, the /. crowd do not represent the demographic who sell themselves best :).

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:Network more, be unemployed less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I have to agree with this.

      After 9 months of mailing out resumes to every job agency under the sun (with a variety of different covering letters, lies and other shameless self promotion tactics), the thing that actually got me my current job was someone who used one of my Open source projects.

      Go Go Go Open Source :)

      (Microsoft never got me a job)

    2. Re:Network more, be unemployed less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, the /. crowd are what most IT departments need.. instead they end up with the crowd that can sell themselves well and not much else.

    3. Re:Network more, be unemployed less by ibennetch · · Score: 1

      As one who is about to graduate college (for television production, not CS), you bring up a question that bothers me a lot. How to distribute my business card and/or resume. I've been in a few situations where I've made friends with some people at big places, places I'd love to work or at least have my name and contact information...but been to scared to give my resume or card to without being asked. Is it appropriate to meet someone at a function, chat with them for a while; and just give them my card? Isn't that rude - it makes it seem (at least to me) that the only reason i'd been chatting with them was to get my name in; which couldn't be further from the truth; but it's not what I intend that matters, it's what the other person perceives.

    4. Re:Network more, be unemployed less by Anitra · · Score: 1

      I've found it's very hard to build up a network while in college. Maybe it's just me... but my proffessors haven't been in industry for a long time, and my one "boss" with good connections isn't inclined to help me out any with finding a job (he's my ex).

      I am more and more tempted to go for my MS and forget this job bullshit for the time being - every single suggestion has little to no bearing for a college student (have lots of experience, have connections, get a job in another field). I don't know what's out there, or even where to start looking; plus I already spend 50+ hours a week on school.

      --

      Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
    5. Re:Network more, be unemployed less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just ask for THEIR card. Most people are flattered. Make sure they remember you, though. Having the point of contact is the most important thing.

  40. re: Jack of all trades by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Informative

    Thirdly, the "Jack of All Trades" background is getting harder to place. Employers want someone with large (sometimes unreasonably so) amounts of experience in particular (sometimes obscure) areas. It used to be that having a generic background was a good thing.

    I have heard the opposite from a training institute instructer and IT placement specialist (although they may be biased somehow).

    They said that mostly small companies are hiring, not larger ones at this point in time. These small companies *do* want a jack-of-all-IT person because they don't have a big enough staff for specialists that we are used to (DBA, programmer, network specialist, help desk, etc.).

    Thus, I am getting conflicting information.

    I would also like to see a forum/story on making a *backup* career for oneself being that IT tends to be very recession-sensative.

  41. Cool.. but by SystematicPsycho · · Score: 1

    I'm about to finish an Honours degree and I still haven't started looking for jobs. I think what I will do is look for contract work first, that also seems to be where most of the jobs are now in I.T, easy to lay off and for other cost cutting reasons. I still haven't read the article because it's /.'d but good to see this stuff around.

    What I've always thought is that writing the best resume is relative to who is reading it, and usually you don't know what they are like and what other ppl's resumes look like comparatively. Basically, you can write a good enough resume to pass as a viable one, but the rest is luck. Usually nowadays they invite (depending on the number of ppl) 2/3rds to an interview. From the interviewer's point of view they get out of work and do something different, more so they want to find the best person they want to work with, and maybe the best person for the job.

    What I don't get and hate is when the interviewer talks to you as if you have already got the job. I went for an interview at Sun once and they even showed me around and where I was going to sit. Almost _2 months later I got the call from a middle man saying they gave it to someone else. Talkin in the sense that you got the job and then ringing/writing and telling you that you don't is a recipe for infuriating the interviewee yet they all do it. Another time I went for a job interview where I even told them I am not so qualified for the job, and the offered and they still offered it to me, showed me around and said I start next week. As I was saying before, you don't know the real situation outside of the interview room, what they are really like or how they are going to take your resume. Does luck have anything to do with it? Yes.

    --
    Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
    1. Re:Cool.. but by bluGill · · Score: 2

      Hint, they were not showing you around, they were trying to get something from you. What I don't know, but something.

      I got the show around on my interview for one job, and it turned out that what they were looking for was someone to sit down and play with the system he would work with. (This was a QA job, so I got to use the product I was going to do QA on)

      Remember, when they show you around the plant you need to keep your eyes open for opportunities to prove you will fit in.

    2. Re:Cool.. but by SystematicPsycho · · Score: 1

      Hrmm I thought about that and I think that is a good point. I guess the interview is not over till you walk out of the door and your out of there sights. Heh, come to think of it, when I went to the secretary to say I was here I was looking at the attendance book to see who else was in there that day (to see if I knew anyone) and when I sat down she slammed it shut.. probably had a word to the interview guy later. Bad move on my part but nevertheless 'interview experience'.

      --
      Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
  42. Here's what has worked for me by UpLateDrinkingCoffee · · Score: 1
    If you are going after a specific job, don't just send them the plain vanilla version of your resume. Try to paint your experience so that it matches the job you are going after. I'm not saying to lie, but everyone has to pick and choose what to put in and what to leave out... just choose the things that are most appropriate to what the potential empoyer is looking for.

    Remember, your resume is not so much about what you've done, but is more about what you can do for someone else.

  43. Damn you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You fuckers slashdotted another site. Fuckers.

  44. need advice on sorting advice by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I get a lot of conflicting information about tuning IT resumes for this tech depression.

    Is there any statistical analysis of what works and what doesn't? (Probably not because too few people are being hired to produce good data :-)

    Heresay is nearly useless if it is all over the map. How about advice from people who have recently gotten hired, at least. Posting successful resumes (minus address, etc.) would be nice.

    1. Re:need advice on sorting advice by leshert · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Here's mine.

      Hired less than a year ago. Got interviews from about 20% of the cold contacts I made; got offers from 5 out of the 6 interviews.

      Looks like I followed >50% of the recommendations. The best one in the thread so far is to analyze all the competencies you list, and break them up into categories (I use three, from "very strong/good " to "experienced" to "familiar"). That was picked up at every interview but one.

      It helps an interviewer tailor his/her questions. For example, if I say "familiar with C++", an interviewer can feel comfortable asking about public/private/protected, extern "C", etc. If I say "very strong C++", I'd better damned well be able to answer questions about things like vtbl layout, partial specialization, the current state of the standard, etc.

    2. Re:need advice on sorting advice by leshert · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oh, and another thing: my "Education" section is the best way I've found to honestly document that fact that I don't have a sheepskin. Over the years, I've had several people read it, ask about the degree, shrug, and make the offer anyway. Be honest.

    3. Re:need advice on sorting advice by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Nice format. I'm not sure I could put mine into a similar format, however. A format good for one person's career may not match another.

      I wonder though about the phrase 'The HTML version is the "canonical" version, and is guaranteed to be up-to-date'.

      This may come across as to Lingo-ish to HR. They don't care about "up to date". It should be your job to synch them, not theirs. It is confusing IMO.

      Thanks

  45. blatant advert - cv tips : by DrSkwid · · Score: 2
    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  46. Why should we tell you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny
    You'll just compete against us for jobs.

    Piss off.

    Better yet, write your resume in green and purple crayon...

  47. Economy speeding up? WTF??? by irishkev · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Perfect Economic Storm?

    Are we about to get smacked by a Perfect Economic Storm? "About to get smacked!? What do you call the last two years?" you say. I know, things have been bad and continue to get worse. But the markets seem to have crossed the rubicon today, headed toward serious doom. Oil prices continue to rise and earnings are going nowhere but down. Many issues are crossing below six year lows. War with Iraq, and God knows where else, is imminent.

    And there's another MAJOR story that is not getting much coverage in the establishment media: the longshoremen lockout. Each day the ports are closed takes backlogs a week to unwind until things return to normal. Each day the ports are closed the U.S. economy loses approximately $1 billion. This is not a labor issue, this is a national security issue. If this longshoremen situation is not resolved in very short order, the U.S. government has a contingency plan to use United States Marines to keep the ports open. The government realizes that the longshoremen (the most militant union of them all) will not allow anyone to break any picket lines without a full tilt riot (or worse) ensuing. But even those guys won't stand up to .mil. What does this mean? I don't know how likely this is, but there is definitely a fair chance that all of the ports in the western U.S. may soon be placed under military control.

    I don't think the port operators would be this bold unless they "knew" something, if you know what I mean. And all of this nonsense is happening as the major swindlers are gearing up for the critical Christmas shopping season:

    In Portland, terminal operators told about 200 dockworkers to leave the Port of Portland's largest container terminal at about 3:15 p.m., in the middle of what union members had expected to be a full day shift.

    "I never thought this would happen," said Bruce Holte, president of ILWU Local 8 in Portland. "It affects our whole economy. The Pacific Maritime Association wants to destroy our economy. Who knows how long they'll want to play this game."

    1. Re:Economy speeding up? WTF??? by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > And there's another MAJOR story that is not getting much coverage in the establishment media: the longshoremen lockout.

      I agree that this is a huge story. I happen to think it's a big reason why the stock market's off - no imports from the Far East, no toys/clothes on the shelves for Xmas, consumer spending drops, and the last bit of the economy implodes.

      So, how do I get to be a longshoreman? $100K/year for unloading big b0x3n off boats sounds like hard work, but fun, especially if this tech thing doesn't work out.

      (Seriously - is it so hazardous that they have to offer that much per year to get anyone to take the job? Or is it really $50K/year, but 16-hour days with overtime results in the $100K/year figure? Or are they being grossly overpaid due to their union's militancy, and a $40K/year grunt with a Palm Pilot could do their job just as well?)

      The media and my prejudices tell me it's the latter, but that convenient match-up is too convenient -- and I therefore think I'm missing something vitally important here. What piece of the puzzle am I missing?

    2. Re:Economy speeding up? WTF??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Pacific Maritime Association represents about 30 companies, IIRC, only 10 or so American companies.

      The ILWU represent 10,000 workers, from the entire west coast.

      Over the years, ILWU members have negotiated themselves a really good deal. They manage their own work, set schedules, and have pay better than many programmers - some senior guys make 80,000 a year.

      The fight has been over new rules the PMA want to impose. The ILWU folks want to have the new technology jobs, as they learn new systems, get better technology, they want to retain how it's used. The ILWU wants the new programmers, sysadmins, security, designers, testers, and everyone else to get to negotiate with the union.

      The PMA would rather the programmers get hired with no benefits, no control over the technology, no access to the union - the lawyers, agents, and politicians that we pay for - to go against the lawyers, agents, and politicans that they pay for.

      The PMA, like most employers, want to dictate the terms, the pay, the hours, the control, the benefits, and everything else. They will choose a few they like and we can take it or leave it.

      The ILWU wants what's best for its members, and programmers, sysadmins, and the rest should organize ourselves for what's in our best interest.

      The PMA wants the equivalent of H1-B visas for the docks.

  48. Make it short and sweet by mjhans · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ever hired anybody? Ever sifted through a pile of even 10 just resumes a day, especially while you're trying to code something on your own?

    Yes, you have 1" to catch my eye. You don't catch my eye with education (the piles are already sorted by BS, MS, etc) You don't catch my eye with experience; I want to know what you want to do, not what you did (you are, after all, hiring for the future, not the past). If you sound interesting, I'll read what you've done.

    You ESPECIALLY don't catch my eye with a multi-page resume if you've worked any less than 10 years. This means you're a babbling idiot who can't summarize properly. This means you'll write lousy memos, ramble on at meetings, and aimless documentation (all of which I've seen, amazingly enough all with multi-page incoherent resumes). The memo part is key. People won't listen to you if you can't write a good memo.

    Yes I have 10 years experience. Yes my resume is 1 page with a clear objective. Yes when my dot bomb went under I was somehow only out of work for roughly a week (admittedly after taking a month of voluntary vacation), fending off offers from both coasts, where everybody else is suffering.

    Coincidence?

    - Matt

    1. Re:Make it short and sweet by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i've got a multi-page resume, with no objective, and was able to get a job in just over 2 weeks.

      6 of one...

      of course, i did crazy things like show up at companies doors with resume in hand with a suit on, to hand the resume personally :-)

      hey - whatever floats ya...

      i've had very good success with my system, and apparently, you have too :-)

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    2. Re:Make it short and sweet by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 3, Insightful
      EnderWiggnz writes: DO NOT put an "Objective" section at the top of your resume
      mjhans writes: Yes, you have 1" to catch my eye. You don't catch my eye with education

      While mjhans has quite a little ego on him, I just need to get it on record that he knows what he's talking about, and EnderWiggnz does not. I can't believe that EnderWiggnz's bad advice is modded up. I'm currently hiring, and I'm going through about 50 resumes each day. The resumes with generic objectives (like "get a job that uses my talents") and the resumes with education at the top (WTF?!?) get trashed pretty quick. I want to see an objective that clearly puts you in my market, or else no objective and a recent job right up front that clearly puts you in my market.

    3. Re:Make it short and sweet by Riskable · · Score: 2

      Well, a resume is a difficult thing to bring down to 1 page if...

      You've done lots of short-term contracting positions (i.e. over the course of 5 years you've done 10-15 contracts). I fall into this category. This is especially difficult if every contract was for different types of work in different industries with different systems and different accomplishments.

      Even if I shrink it down to an 8 point font (which I've tried), it's still about 4 pages long. I would prefer if I could just have one page with the usual stuff, and then one page with systems knowledge/technical skills. I could summarize it all up as, "Did all sorts of technical contracting work for 5 years", but I don't think that sounds very impressive or interesting.

      --
      -Riskable
      "Those who choose proprietary software will pay for their decision!"
    4. Re:Make it short and sweet by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      objectives are stupid. they only limit.

      education can go later, yeh... if your top-listed job is extremely impressive.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    5. Re:Make it short and sweet by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      Don't list everything!!! Definately don't use 8 point typeface! 14 point is more like it! (Only slight sarcasm).

      The whole point is that if real human beings are going through your resume, they just won't read it all! If they are ranked by computer on word "hits," well... maybe 4 pages will work... I really don't know much about these systems.

      If you only have one page to give someone an idea if you are worth a one to four hour interview, or at least a follow-up call, you need to be efficient. While I would hardly say this is the parent's problem, don't put something in if it is just filler!

    6. Re:Make it short and sweet by 2short · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more. There is zero chance I will look past the first page of a resume. If it's over three, I'll probably trash it on that basis alone. I don't care about every job you've ever had. In my first pass, I'm not even looking at your experience directly at all. I'm looking solely to find out if you are after *this* job or after *any* job. A well stated objective can make this instantly clear. Once I've got the 10% who are actually interested specifically in the job I'm offering, almost all of them will have acceptable levels of experience anyway. I may be unusual in that if I'm hiring, for example, a database guy, having worked with the exact RDBMS we use is a very minor bonus at best. I'm mainly looking for someone who is genuinely excited about data (It still shocks me that they exist, but that's a different issue)

    7. Re:Make it short and sweet by guttentag · · Score: 2
      the piles are already sorted by BS, MS, etc
      <SARCASM>
      You sort your applicants into piles of BullShit artists and MicroSoft users? I'd hate to see what categories fall under "etcetera."
      </SARCASM>
  49. war and econ by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Well since the President is hell bent on waging war with Iraq of course the economy is going to speed up. Nothing like a good war to boost our economy.

    I don't think that is true anymore. The Gulf war didn't seem to change the economy.

    It depresses everybody it seems and they hunker down and don't spend. Plus, higher oil pricess.

    1. Re:war and econ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It probably has to do with the RIAA hiring a warfare expert CTO.

    2. Re:war and econ by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > I don't think that is true anymore. The Gulf war didn't seem to change the economy.
      >
      > It depresses everybody it seems and they hunker down and don't spend. Plus, higher oil pricess.

      In the short term, yes.

      Which is why I say, once we've got our men and materiel in place, let's get the damn war started already.

      Once the war's over with, and we've seized the oil fields (and/or turned them over to allied nations), oil drops to $20 (or less!), and we've got 40-year-low interest rates. Then the economy can recover.

      I'd much rather see that - low oil prices - used to bail out the airlines rather than another $5B in taxpayer bucks.

    3. Re:war and econ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once the war's over with, and we've seized the oil fields....

      You are scaring me, dude. Please stay *out* of elected office regardless how bad the tech slump gets

    4. Re:war and econ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This scares you?

      He is saying exactly what any rational, intelligent person can clearly see that our elected officials are thinking.

      Frankly, he'd be far better for the job, since he is at least truthful.

      I mean, what country doesn't act in their own self-intrest? Do you really believe that whatever country you live in behaves any differently? Talk about naive...

    5. Re:war and econ by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > He is saying exactly what any rational, intelligent person can clearly see that our elected officials are thinking.
      >
      >Frankly, he'd be far better for the job, since he is at least truthful.

      (Thanks, I think :-)

      Better for the job, maybe - but being truthful also means I'll never get the job, so the first AC has nothing to worry about :)

      Hey, the entire market wants to short oil at $40 - but nobody wants to short oil until it gets to $40. Result is what we've got today - $30 oil and a sluggish economy.

      And although I'm a hawk, you don't have to be a hawk to realize that if a war's gonna happen, the sooner it's won and over with, the better.

  50. MS Word by paradesign · · Score: 2
    Ya know, Word comes with a template for these sorts of occasions

    but seriously, in my field (industrial design) your resume is meaningless. its all about your portfolio of work. i know kids that didnt even graduste that got top jobs because they had a hot portfolio. whats my point, employers want to see what youve accomplished, not the paper slips youve accumulated.

    --
    I want 2D games back.
    1. Re:MS Word by melodon · · Score: 1

      I get plenty of resumes titled resume.doc I save them to a folder where I put resumes, and so the latest one always overwrites the previous one. I figure if someone is not savvy enough to change the name of the document (especially if they're going to call later and ask if I got their resume), they're not very savvy period.

  51. You forgot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    5) PROFIT!!!!!

  52. As someone who has interviewed 50+ people... by gosand · · Score: 5, Informative
    Over the years I have interviewed at least 50 people for jobs. I have been working in QA for the last 8 years, and usually the companies have had a policy where people from different groups (development, QA, management, etc) interview someone, and then put their heads together to see if they are worth hiring. After all, you usually have to work with all kinds of different people, and although technical skills are a must, if you can't get along with the people you work with, you aren't worth much.

    Avoid spelling mistakes and typos. Come on folks, this is a resume. If you misspell something, then your chances just got cut in half. Once we were interviewing for a documentation person, and she misspelled 3 words on her resume. She had no chance after that.

    A good tip about experience with different things is to rate your experience. I know on mine, I broke up technical experience into three categories: experienced, some knowledge, familiar. That way when you say "familiar with dbase" you can expand on that in the interview to tell them exactly what "familiar" means.

    Know what you say you know. We were hiring someone into our QA group, and we were testing on Unix servers. We had to have someone with Unix experience. One guy had the word "unix" in several places on his resume, but when we got him in the interview, he couldn't even answer my basic questions. (what is your favorite shell in Unix?) He asked me what I meant. He didn't know what shell scripting was, but he thought he could learn it. Then came the blunt questions "how well do you know Unix?" He said "pretty well". Guess what, for proclaiming to know Unix and not knowing a damn thing about it, he got to see the door.

    Don't put the standard, tired, canned crap on your resume (Objective, hobbies, etc). Believe me, they all start to look the same. What you say in your objective really doesn't help at all, it can only really hurt you. If your objective isn't worded for the position you are interviewing for, then HR may not even pass your resume on. And if I want to know your hobbies, I'll ask you about them in the interview. And printing your picture on it is dumb. Being "clever" for the sake of being clever probably won't help.

    Show that you know how to use your experience, put down some quick details about projects that you have worked on (# of people on the project, the type of project, etc) Don't go into too much detail, but don't just say "coded in C". Be specific, but not boring. If you read what you wrote, would some questions about it come to mind? (and not - what the hell does that mean?) Pretend to have been interested in past projects, even if you weren't. Nobody wants to hire someone who is just there to get a paycheck and doesn't care about what they are doing.

    Be honest. Really, that is about it. Don't blow smoke up anyone's butt, don't interview as someone you are not. Be yourself, that is who they should be hiring. If you aren't right for the job, then it is because you aren't right for the job, not that you didn't put on the right game face.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:As someone who has interviewed 50+ people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > One guy had the word "unix" in several places on his resume....

      The paragraph this was snipped from underlines a bigger problem. Why where you even interviewing this clown? What context was 'unix' used in the resume? Did you even *read* the resume? More important (and probably the actual problem), did you even *comprehend* his resume? You don't outline how this bozo was selected, but it sounds like you set a buzz-word filter at '10' (or '11') for 'unix' and just took what it spit out.

      Case in point: I have friend with some 8 years of Informix experience. This persion has dealt with more relational database issues in a month than I ever will (or want to) in my lifetime. Why is this person unemployed? His resume doesn't say "oracle."

    2. Re:As someone who has interviewed 50+ people... by fastdecade · · Score: 1

      And here's how to think like a headhunter without being one, although it only applies if you're already in a job: Whenever you get a chance, get into a position where you're helping your company with the selection process. Your manager is busy and does not understand all of the technology on the CV.

      If you make yourself available to help screen CVs, many managers will be very pleased to let you see them. Believe me,looking through dozens of CVs is a great way to learn about what works and what comes out like crap.

      Likewise for performing interviews.

      And of course there's another big benefit too. It gives you a very candid view of what's going on out there...what technologies
      are being used, what industries are hot, and of course how many $$$ are certain skills worth.

  53. I wasn't being "funny"... oh well by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This is sadly true. If you want a job, your resume must proudly wear your bullshit.

    I may have worded it a bit humourously, but I was actually being serious. I don't care, however -- karma is karma :)

    But you really do have to BS everything and present yourself as some sort of living God, even if the facts couldn't possibly check out.

    All the other things you mentioned work whether you BS or not, however.

  54. Tips from a Chief Architect/Tech Officer by tizzyD · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Having been a CTA and CTO for many companies including IBM and many start-ups, I wanted to share a few ideas for good resumes.
    1. Make it look nice. If it looks like crap, I think your code looks like crap. Marketing is critical here.
    2. Don't include every technology you've ever touched. If you do, I love calling people on their tech knowledge. You've used Intermedia, interesting. Tell me, what's the function of a stemmer and how does it work in Intermedia? Don't be too agressive. You cannot know everything.
    3. If you put multiple tools or editors down, make sure you know them. I used to ask people what they liked about a Visual Cafe over JBuilder, and, more importantly, why. If they used BEA and Websphere, great, tell me why I would use one or the other. If you can't do that, then you don't know the tools.
    4. IMHO Certifications quite frankly are crap. They show you can take tests, not that you understand the tools or languages. Mention them later, not at the top.
    5. A style note: use verbs!!!! Developed, Created, Architected, Designed, Coded, Documented etc. Do not use sentences. I was responsibile for is a banned phrase.
    If you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. Hope it helps.
    --
    ...tizzyd
    1. Re:Tips from a Chief Architect/Tech Officer by bplipschitz · · Score: 1

      --
      A style note: use verbs!!!! Developed, Created, Architected, Designed, Coded, Documented etc. Do not use sentences. I was responsibile for is a banned phrase.
      --

      Jesus Criminy! Use *real* verbs, not ones invented by some hack businessman or the military.

      Architected? Just WTF does *that* mean?

    2. Re:Tips from a Chief Architect/Tech Officer by tizzyD · · Score: 1

      It implies that you worked in an architectural capacity. In that case then, you're usually running the show for the approach, having a team or engineering lead implementing the vision. "Designed" is a bit light. Hey, it's got me a nice 6 figure salary. ;-)

      --
      ...tizzyd
    3. Re:Tips from a Chief Architect/Tech Officer by bplipschitz · · Score: 1


      --
      It implies that you worked in an architectural capacity. In that case then, you're usually running the show for the approach, having a team or engineering lead implementing the vision. "Designed" is a bit light. Hey, it's got me a nice 6 figure salary. ;-)
      --

      Nothing wrong with a 6-figure salary, it's just mangled English.

    4. Re:Tips from a Chief Architect/Tech Officer by long_john_stewart_mi · · Score: 1

      Ummm... I typed 'architected' into Dictionary.com, and the server crashed...

      --
      ...oOOo..'(_)'..oOOo...
  55. length by sirinek · · Score: 2

    With all the resume tips being posted, heres another.

    Keep it under 4 pages. I dont care if you have 25 years of experience, keep it 3 or fewer pages. I personally watched my manager THROW AWAY a bunch of 5-6 page resumes he had. Too much information. No one cares what you did in 1983.

    siri

    1. Re:length by Snork+Asaurus · · Score: 1
      Various things that I have read confirm what you say. It seems ironic that a technical person's resume should not be thorough and detailed, but we live in the age of advertising, soundbites and newsbites, and people not having time to do justice to a given task. It seems doubly ironic that a technical person's resume should be written by someone who's good at the psychology of effective advertising, but this again seems to be true.

      Yet, IIRC, a few weeks ago, there was an item here at Slashdot about someone who found that the standard search/hiring processes were frequently netting him the wrong people. Go figure.

      --
      Sigs are bad for your health.
    2. Re:length by sirinek · · Score: 2

      While I agree with your sentiment about things these days being overly condensed, I think its pretty valid that you should just detail your pertinent skills. A lot of these over-sized resumes had a lot of unrelated job experience and stuff that the applicant hadn't used in many many years.

      I read in "Knock 'em Dead", a respected book for job-hunters, that you should only have one page for every 10 years of experience. That seems a bit light to me, but still, I stand by my "less than 4 pages" idea.

      siri

    3. Re:length by tizzyD · · Score: 1

      3 pages. CEO's don't have 3 page resumes. Go with 2 or under. A good rule: don't have a longer resume than the people with whom you're interviewing. Americans want resumes, not CVs.

      --
      ...tizzyd
  56. MS and PhD poison by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    beautiful women everywhere

    Yes, but if you are a CS major, you never get to actually touch them.

    In a few years, I'll have at least a Master's, but that's only if I completely fail to achieve a PhD.

    High-end degrees in computer science may actually count *against* you. Be careful. Many employers are thinking about finding someone with specific skills, and a PHD will just make them think that you want a higher salary dispite not knowing the specific skill more than the next guy.

    1. Re:MS and PhD poison by back_pages · · Score: 1
      Hehe, lots of scary replies, oh no.

      Let me put my personal spin on this.

      My girlfriend is hot. I love to look at other girls, naturally, since I am a male. I'm also a computer geek who lifts weights and I'm not at all worried about being lonely in life.

      I'm not worried about being too educated. Working in research would suit me just fine. I would happily trade the stresses and pressures of that career for working in a cubicle like Dilbert. If push comes to shove, I would rather be a college professor than have some 9-5 job where I'm always rushing the deadline to get Sham-in-a-Box ver. 9.03 out the door.

      And let's not forget what the future holds for a recent graduate with a BS in CS - a truck load of debt and any shitty job he is lucky enough to land. The golden days of CS are not now. We are unquestionably in a period where there are more emerging CS degrees than jobs. The market will surely balance this eventually, but in the mean time, I have a life to deal with, bills to pay, and cynicism to nurture.

      So no, I'm not exactly worried about the possible negative ramifications of getting a higher education. If I can't make it into grad school, I am very seriously considering enlisting, since a BS in mathematics and a BS in computer science have gotten me nothing but debt.

  57. Job Woes by geomon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The current job situation in the IT industry reminds me of the energy industry nearly two decades ago. At that time, I was graduating with a bachelor's degree in geology and was looking forward to employment in an oil or mineral exploration company.

    Then the price of oil dropped to less than $20 a barrel.

    The immediate fallout was that oil and mineral companies put a hiring freeze on new undergraduates. Several of them were holding on to their graduates and PhDs in the hope that oil prices would recover leaving them with a core exploration group to field when it was needed.

    It wasn't long before energy companies started laying off the people with masters degrees and, soon, the PhDs. In short, there was blood in the streets. The old joke was renewed: "Why did the guy with a bachelors in geology fail to get a job at McDonalds? Because he didn't have his PhD."

    I couldn't stand the idea of going back to school. I was tired of school (starvation) and wanted to start working again. I gathered up all of my networking contacts and pressed them hard for any job available. None of them were offering jobs in geology. So I started looking in other related industries.

    I figured that if I could get inside of Exxon or Shell, then I could post for internal positions when they started arriving. My foray into the petrochemical industry started with a job in a small formaldehyde plant. I was the only operator with a degree. Heck, I was the only one in the plant with more than a high school education. That experience, however, gave me an in-road into another field - industrial hygiene. I went from plant to factory performing routine studies of industrial exposure to workplace hazards.
    After a few short years, I had learned enough about the field that I considered certifying as an industrial hygienist.

    But I found an ad in a local newspaper that was offering a job as a well-site geologist who had industrial safety training. Because I had taught industrial safety as a hygienist, I got the job. It was a lateral move with fewer benefits and was a contract position. But it was in geology, a field I had long given up hope of getting a job.

    I was eventually hired on permanently and have been here for the last 10 years. I now have more work than I can perform myself. I will have to farm the excess out to people who have more education and work experience than myself.

    The point? Don't stop working just because you've graduated and can't get entry-level work in your field. The IT field will eventually shake out the deadwood and under-qualified. If you continue to keep your skills up, the day will come when your skills are not only needed, they are hard to find. This translates into greater job security than if you were to have taken the first job you could find in your field only to be laid off 8 months later.

    Don't give up.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    1. Re:Job Woes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the day will come when your skills are not only needed, they are hard to find.

      Thats when Congress opens up the H-1B floodgates yet more and lets the damned fucken foriengers ruin our short-lived good salaries.

      Fuck H-1B's! Fuckem hard!

      Go home Indie! Scram! I hate your little guts!

    2. Re:Job Woes by Anitra · · Score: 1

      The point? Don't stop working just because you've graduated and can't get entry-level work in your field.

      Don't STOP?? I can't start! I can't find an entry-level job anywhere, much less one that I'm actually qualified for...

      --

      Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
    3. Re:Job Woes by andy@petdance.com · · Score: 2
      I can't start! I can't find an entry-level job anywhere, much less one that I'm actually qualified for...

      What exactly are you qualified for? I have no idea. Why isn't there a resume on your web page? When I saw your comment, I looked to see what you were about. I couldn't tell other than that you play trombone.

      Make it your job to get a job. Think like a hunter.

    4. Re:Job Woes by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I was graduating with a bachelor's degree in geology and was looking forward to employment in an oil or mineral exploration company. Then the price of oil dropped to less than $20 a barrel. The immediate fallout was that oil and mineral companies put a hiring freeze on new undergraduates.

      It used to be that one could get petro-related jobs in Saudi when oil was cheap. Sort of a reverse H-1B situation (B1-H?). I don't know if this is still the case being that they crank out baby's like mad over there.

      I wonder if there is not something like that now for IT people?

  58. What -not- to mention in your resume... by suss · · Score: 2

    There was a guy on IRC just yesterday, presented the channel his resume...

    Interests and activities:

    System level programming, networks, viruses, hacking, mail bombing, mail faking, Denial of service, password cracking, trojans, software reverse engineering.

    I mean, dude!

    The sad thing is, he was serious about it.

    1. Re:What -not- to mention in your resume... by cpuenvy · · Score: 1

      Sir,
      For certain jobs, these are sought after skills.

      Just an FYI :)

      --
      DISCLAIMER:

      I don't believe what I write, and neither should you.

  59. What economy are they referring to by paulie+walnuts · · Score: 1

    Speaking from experience in the Portland Oregon market.... someone is on crack Most of my friends in the tech field are all hurting in a bad way. I have inside info from several different hiring managers complaining about the sheer number of applicants for one position. (network security slots in health care and a few actual tech shops) where the manager and HR have had to deal with 500 applicants for one position. The supply/demand model for tech workers in Oregon is severly broken!! DONT MOVE HERE!!

    1. Re:What economy are they referring to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't there any defense contractors in Portland? I would think that they are hiring like crazy.

    2. Re:What economy are they referring to by forkboy · · Score: 2

      NO kidding dude.....I live in Denver and the market here is pretty bad for techies too. I started applying to jobs in Oregon thinking that maybe it wouldn't be as glutted....20 resumes later and not even a polite rejection letter, and I went back to school. Fuck the tech sector, I'm getting into something else.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    3. Re:What economy are they referring to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Philadelphia job market is the same...

    4. Re:What economy are they referring to by ErikZ · · Score: 2

      Only if you have a "Secret" clearance.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  60. rpg by Frymaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    everybody hates job-hunting, so my advice is to make it like a role playing game. you "roll up" a resume and send it off to do battle with various hr creeps. if you "win" (get the job) you gain some experience and skills that you add to your character.

    right now my resume looks like this:

    name: frymaster
    class: paladin (web)
    level: 6
    alignment: /dev/urandom
    str: 12
    int: 16
    wis: 15
    dex: 17
    char: 9
    hp: 45

    bonuses:
    +9 vs. enterprise applications
    +4 vs. venture capitalists

    spells:
    exercise stock options
    exorcise stock options
    dispell windows
    summon libraries
    banish end user
    read documentation
    evangelize

    skills:
    hide in office (+20)
    comment code (+10 elvish)

    languages:
    java, php, elvish

    1. Re:rpg by eli173 · · Score: 1

      Ok, we need a version of the 'Geek Code' for this...
      Basically, define what everything correlates to and how to determine a numeric value...

      That could be fun.

      Oh wait, you mean it would take time?!

    2. Re:rpg by DrCode · · Score: 2

      This is great! If I don't get a job soon, I may implement this in my game engine (Exult).

    3. Re:rpg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe (in AD&D at least) that you can only be a Palladin if you are lawful good...
      Very nice humor, though.

    4. Re:rpg by Yamcha+xXXx · · Score: 1

      Here's what my resume looks liike following your format:

      Name: Yamcha
      Class: USER Assassin
      Level: 11
      Alignment: Chaotic Neutral
      Race: Human

      Str: 17
      Int: 13
      Wis: 16
      Dex: 14
      Con: 16
      Cha: 11
      Hp: 129

      Bonuses:
      -15 vs Corporate Compliance
      -10 vs Corporate Bullsh!t
      -6 vs Backstabbers
      +8 vs Office Software
      +7 vs Network/Server/LAN Software

      Spells:
      Charisma (46%)
      Summon Drivers (Adept)95%
      Charm USER (Adept)85%
      Anti-Virus Shell (Adept)85%
      Harm Error (73%)
      Resist HR (12%) (Hidden/Unknown Spell)

      Skills:
      PC Common Sense (84%)
      Poison Weapon (34%)
      Sneak Food (Adept)95% (Hidden/Unknown Skill)
      Reveal User (Adept)85%
      Fix PC (Adept)85%
      Break PC (16%) (Hidden/Unknown Skill)
      Build PC (Adept)85%
      Fend Backstabbers (34%) (Hidden/Unknown Skill)

      Languages:
      Javascript (67%)
      C++ (26%)
      Techie Talk (71%)
      Ebonics (Adept)85%
      Bull$h!tting (29%)

    5. Re:rpg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Name : MachinShin
      Class: Programmer
      Level: 15
      Alignment: Chaotic Evil
      Race : Human

      Str : 13
      Int : 17
      Wis : 14
      Dex : 12
      Con : 13
      Char : 10
      HP : 75

      bonuses:
      +5 vs. Programming
      +6 vs. Techspeak

      Skills :
      Build PC ( Adept ) 83%
      PC Common Sense ( 85% )

      Languages :
      C++ ( 86% )
      Python ( 55% )
      Techie Talk ( 95% )
      BullShitting ( 99% )

  61. Fake unemployment figures by peter303 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The unemployement figures dont count people who stop looking for various reasons. The link suggest over three million may have stopped looked already in the current recession. A more accurate way is to look at Bureau of Labor total payroll figures which seems to be falling.

  62. How true geeks get jobs by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    An engineering friend of mine is trying a different approach. Rather than learning to smile better, lie better, and shave better, he is using technology itself:

    He is putting a timed spring on the back of his resume. (Actually, it is kind of a flipper, penguin-like even.) When they toss his resume in the trash, it pops back out onto the top of the desk at night. It has multiple reloads so that it can pop back out multiple times.

    If it works, I am going to buy a set.

    1. Re:How true geeks get jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not much use when it takes the 500 resumes on top of it with it to the desk. Solving that problem is extra credit.

    2. Re:How true geeks get jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens when the reviewer crumples up the paper and receives a nasty stab in the hand from the spring? Or perhaps the resume goes into a shredder, in which case the spring causes the shredding mechanism to overload and spark a fire that destroys half the building.

      Not a good way to secure a job, I think.

    3. Re:How true geeks get jobs by Snork+Asaurus · · Score: 1
      Not much use when it takes the 500 resumes on top of it with it to the desk. Solving that problem is extra credit.

      Maybe it's a REALLY BIG spring. I'd just like to know how he attached the spring to the e-mail.

      --
      Sigs are bad for your health.
    4. Re:How true geeks get jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens when the reviewer crumples up the paper and receives a nasty stab in the hand from the spring? Or perhaps the resume goes into a shredder, in which case the spring causes the shredding mechanism to overload...

      The idea is that it will work at *some* places. It does not have to work at all.

    5. Re:How true geeks get jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does not have to work at all.

      Should be "...at all places."

    6. Re:How true geeks get jobs by DrVxD · · Score: 2

      > I'd just like to know how he attached the spring to the e-mail.

      Content-Type: misc/Spring
      Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
      Content-Disposition: attachment ...

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
  63. Who _uses_ a hobbies/interests section? by ProtonMotiveForce · · Score: 0

    Really, are people putting these on their resume's? Truly dweeby.

    Remings me of the sigs you'll see where people describe their awesome dream machine they build. Who gives a flying, spattering shit what your hobbies are?

    --
    My Baby
    Dual i386, with 64M(!!) overclocked 35Mhz memory and a SuperX VLB PCI card, hand build Linux OS (I call it TurdWare 1.0!).

  64. That's pretty funny by Infonaut · · Score: 2
    except that this is a Slashdot article, not a job. In terms of overall personal relevance, I'd consider a job to be a *mite* more important. ;-)

    Besides, as I'm sure you know, my point wasn't that people who submit poor resumes are worthless. My point was that hiring managers have only a limited amount of time to go through a lot of resumes. Unfortunately, if you make errors on your resume, it is quite likely that your resume won't be seriously evaluated.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  65. Toilet Bowl Scrubber by doomicon · · Score: 1

    "help the economy out and buy things"... yea I like that. I love when George tells regular working guys like ourselves to "Invest in America".. meanwhile, I'm out of a job in three months because my CIO is "investing in India".

    What really pisses me off, is going to Yahoo finance, and finding out that while 27,000 were laid off last year because of a "slowing economy", the top four exec's made a combined 60+ million.

    Top that off with the Big Business Tax break that my Gubner "Jeb", gave to the company I work for last year... s**t shouldn't I be seeing some of this money f**king "trickle" by now?

    However, I've come to realize I am wrong about trickle down economics. What it really translates too is this... The money flows into my CXX's pockets, they in turn have enuff money to hire that extra toilet cleaner... So I am brushing up my resume to reflect My Mad 31337 Bowl Scrubbing sK1lz!

    --

    Awesome!
  66. Think like the hiring manager by andy@petdance.com · · Score: 5, Informative
    A topic close to my heart, since I'm in the middle of looking for a programmer.

    First off, nobody should look for a job without reading Nick Corcodilos' excellent Ask The Headhunter.

    Second, think like a hiring manager. Remember that the hiring manager has 50 resumes in a folder that HR has dumped in his lap, or worse, 50 emails that have been forwarded from HR.

    Tell me, as a manager, exactly what you can do for me. This might mean some extra work on your part customizing a copy of your resume, and of course writing a job-specific cover letter. DO IT. Don't skimp here.

    I want to know exactly what the applicant can do to help me out. Make a thumbnail sketch of what you are. The top of my resume looks like this:

    16 years professional software development, most recently specializing in Perl, PHP and ColdFusion, including
    • Project leader and senior software engineer for TITLEWAVE online library collection and e-commerce site (1 year)
    • Developing object-oriented Perl and PHP, including interfacing with Oracle and MySQL (8 years)
    • Creating intranet database applications with Cold Fusion, Access & VBA and SQL (5 years)
    • Creating flagship software products in C/C++ (5 years)
    Five lines sum up my background and experience, and highlight my key skills. Compare this with the standard meaningless "Objective" heading. Besides, "To obtain a position as a developer that will utilize my skills & experience" is just cargo-cult resume writing.

    Other little notes from my resume sins file:

    • Do not discuss money. If the ad asks for a salary range, then specify it, but then leave it alone.
    • Put your name and contact info on every document, probably on every page. Stuff gets mixed up once it comes out on paper.
    • Don't try to hide your small amount of experience by omitting dates. I won't be fooled.
    • Tell me why you are better then the other 90% of the resumes I'm getting.
    • I take filling this position very seriously. I expect you to do the same. Cookie-cutter cover letters get round-filed.

    Ask The Headhunter makes the key point that managers WANT to hire you. They want to find someone that they can hire so that we can all get back to doing real work. Make it easy for me to see that you are the person for the job.

    1. Re:Think like the hiring manager by Snork+Asaurus · · Score: 1
      At first, I thought that you insight was valuable and well- reasoned. Then I read your sig and thought "should I take advice from a guy who quotes Gene Simmons?".

      Then I realized that:

      A) I know who Gene Simmons is and used to own the first several KISS albums (gasp);

      B) My sig is a quote from Marvin the Martian; and

      C) I have been reading Ask The Headhunter for several months and find Nick Corcodilos insightful and refreshingly honest (e.g., he says that most people do not get jobs through headhunters and that one should not focus all their efforts through them). I think that reading Nick, who also has engineering-specific columns at EE Times is time well-spent.

      So, given the above, my conclusion is that your insight is brilliant ;-}

      --
      Sigs are bad for your health.
  67. How long should techie resumes be? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Don't write a 10 page essay about your previous jobs

    I get conflicting info on resume size for techies. Some still say 1 page only (which is nearly impossible for seasoned technies unless they list barebones), others say no longer than 3 pages.

    I am going to leave mine at 3 until I see real statistical evidence otherwise, not heresay. (Other professions don't count.)

    1. Re:How long should techie resumes be? by bbqBrain · · Score: 1

      My opinion is that keeping a resume to a definite page length is ridiculous. Of course, I also feel distributing a resume in a proprietary format like MS Word is presumptuous and a terrible idea. Consider that your resume might make its way to a sysadmin or seasoned software developer who only works on *nix boxes. You could make a really good impression with nothing more than the file format of your resume.

      PDF or HTML would be my recommendation. Personally, I write mine in HTML with very clean code, proper use of stylesheets, etc. I even use a little color for headings, but I make sure they will print well in grayscale. The point is, the length of a hardcopy of my resume will depend on the browser rendering it. (I can email you a copy, if you like.)

      Oh, if you go with this approach, do be prepared for clueless HR reps who understand nothing but MS Office format. Quite sadly, I've actually had to instruct someone to open my HTML file in a web browser ("Do you use Internet Explorer? That should work fine.").

      --

      One of the reasons that I became a lawyer was to avoid ever having to hire one. -SPYvSPY
    2. Re:How long should techie resumes be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're sending via e-mail then you should put your cover letter and resume in the body of the e-mail, txt format of course, and then have .doc attachments.

      Remember, even if your going for some geek linux job, most human resources people will still be using MS products.

    3. Re:How long should techie resumes be? by xtremex · · Score: 1

      I have 2 resumes. One LONG and one short. If I send the shorter one (no matter how many times people tell me that's the one to send), I don't get calls back. If they need experience with a Sun E10000 and I only have listed a Sun StarFire (due to space constraints), they won't call me (I've checked).
      So, the big one lists everything that I can remember using, and then they say it's too convoluted.

      --
      If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
    4. Re:How long should techie resumes be? by 2short · · Score: 1

      Nearly impossible? Are you under the impression there are any rules whatsoever for what must be listed on a resume? Summarize! When I'm reading resumes, if it's not listed on the first page, it's not there. Do you have experience with every database system ever concieved of? Great, say that; don't waste my time listing them. Admittedly, this approach will not serve you as well if the job is with a company scanning resumes with a computerized buzzword-finder or it's human equivalent, the HR drone. I consider that OK, because I don't want that job.

    5. Re:How long should techie resumes be? by IndependentVik · · Score: 1

      That's why if you know they need experience with Widget X, you write at length about your experience with Widget X and trim down your bullets regarding unrelated skills.

      One of the best tips I ever heard was this: Modify your resume for every job you apply to.

      --
      I'd suggest you don't use Slashdot as your only news source, or you will suffer permanent brain damage.
    6. Re:How long should techie resumes be? by xtremex · · Score: 1

      My job hunting is a full time job. Modifying my resume for each job I apply to is VERY impractical. I've tried it. I apply on avg to 20 jobs per day, and I will have a million resumes everywhere, and send the wrong one to the wrong person, etc. Plus the 6 hours a day I spend job hunting would turn to 8

      --
      If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
  68. Not just 2-4 inches. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Having scanned thousands of resumes in my time...

    In general, only the first sentence of the first few paragraphs are read. The rest is skimmed.

    The skim looks to weight the paper on keywords and your written presentation skills.

    Time spent per resume? About 3-8 seconds.

    If you pass that test, it will be read -- but mostly for reasons NOT to hire you. This would include the typical "degree bigot" check for grossly outdated BS/MS credentials.

    "Objectives" are strictly rejection criteria. There is simply nothing you can say to fit the details of any given job well enough to make sense. Thus, your "objectives" rarely fit well with the job under review -- hence the rejection.

    The biggest problem today is automated HR systems. They can only search for that obnoxious laundry list of every technology everyone in the chain remembers the company ever used. The systems simply cannot recognize aptitude.

    So you end up with these stupid generalist resumes. You know, people with every freaking technology in the world listed. Typically the result of finding themselves on the market so often for sub-par performance.

    Trouble is the market is absolutely flooded with people who have been told "Computers are where the money is", and literally boatloads of people brough in under fraudulant H1-B requirements. What was a search for a 5% "cream of the crop" is now a search for the .5%, or worse.

    What was a hundred resumes is now ten thousand. How does anyone stand a chance in what has become more a game of chance than skill?

    1. Re:Not just 2-4 inches. by 2short · · Score: 1

      "How does anyone stand a chance in what has become more a game of chance than skill?"

      4 things:
      1. Be very picky about the jobs you aplly for. Only send resumes to the ones that are a very good match.
      2. Cover Letter
      3. Cover Letter
      4. Cover Letter

      As for the automated HR systems, they'll reject my resume every time. I consider this a feature.

    2. Re:Not just 2-4 inches. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > As for the automated HR systems, they'll reject my resume every time.

      "Reject" is a funny word. They tend to rank them, then the top N get sent onto the manager for review.

      The trouble is the chain of people this has to go through and is compounded by the fact that most people don't know how these systems work.

      For example. I've seen "C/Unix" groups list C, C++, and Java on their reqs. Why? 'Cus C++ and Java suggest they are object oriented thinkers.

      But. The resumatic will rank the world's best C programmer lower than one that lists Java too. Even if the C programmer wrote a freaking C++ compiler.

      You end up with a case of the blind asking for the resumatic to search for the blind. Both sides tring to do the right thing, with the resumatic nonsense turning it all into slimy ooz.

      The IT employment process is simply overautomated. But, the cycle is set. The process is employing at random, more or less, and that means average skill levels are declining (hence the significant growth in remarkably narrow specializations.)

      > Cover Letter.

      Not much value. Covers are torn off in HR. Remember, the resumatic only cares about resume documents. All I get to see, ever, is the of resumes.

    3. Re:Not just 2-4 inches. by 2short · · Score: 1

      The point I was trying to make is that if my resume somehow got to the resumatic, it would rank me very low, and I wouldn't get considered. That's cool with me because the resumatic is used by large corporations, which I hate working for. My advice was about how to get a job at a small company. It's the only advice I can offer, as it's the only type of job I've enjoyed, and it's the only place I've read resumes (and cover letters, which are far more important than the resume in getting an interview with me)

    4. Re:Not just 2-4 inches. by leandrod · · Score: 2
      > As for the automated HR systems, they'll reject my resume every time.

      Have you read Player Piano by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr?

      It features, among other gadgets of a fully-automated USNA, what you are calling resumatics. In the history, it has the effect of keeping talented but disadjusted people out of the system. As in your case, in the story the disadjusted are the only sane people, but then, as the story takes the idea ad absurdum, they have no place in the economy at all. Thus they begin a Luddite revolution, together with people who do are accepted but feel unhappy about the whole thing. The revolution ultimately fails because the same people who started it end up using they creativity to fix the same machines they destroyed...

      In real life, this could be part of the suicide mode big corporations tend to switch into once they start to keep insisting on missing the Cluetrain.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
  69. JerseyTom is a freak. by airrage · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The guy who posted this story is, well, let me put it in his words, "...My name is Tom Limoncelli and I'm a 32-year old poly, bi, white male that lives in New Jersey." Dude, next time, leave the details out...sheesh.

    --
    "This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
    1. Re:JerseyTom is a freak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude your right that is one freaky bastard. Look at that picture, then you understand why he looks like that when you go to his About Tom page. I am going to go puke up my lunch now!

  70. Never underestimate a good cover letter by Courageous · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've reviewed a lot of resumes. A lot. One piece of advice; write a cover letter, very brief (a paragraph!) that is costomized _specifically_ for where you are applying. Furthermore, I suggest that you touch up your resume for every job.

    The point of the cover letter: to get the interviewer to read the resume, and to positively bias them towards what they read there.

    The point of the resume: to get the interviewer to want to interview you.

    Don't oversell any one point. It's a waste of energy. The point of your resume is not to get the interviewer to want to hire you. The point of your resume is to get the interviewer to want to interview you.

    For tech jobs, make sure you have a "buzzword" section. Little to no prose is acceptible in this section. We interviewers have short attention spans. It's common for us to use a yellow hiliter and simply hilite your technical skills. It's quite possible that we can make the decision to interview you on your cover letter alone. To wit:

    "
    Dear Sir or Madam,

    I noticed that XYZ widget company is looking for a skilled senior XXX engineer. I've long had an interest in your company, and I'm enthused with the work that you've done, particularly in the area of ZZZ research. I have up-to-date skills in XXX-A, XXX-B, and XXX-C. Let's schedule an interview to see how it would be possible for me to contribute to your team.

    --[Signed, hotshot]"

    Anyway, hope this helps.

    C//

    1. Re:Never underestimate a good cover letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Sir or Madam,

      I noticed that XYZ widget company is looking for a skilled senior XXX engineer. I've long had an interest in your company, and I'm enthused with the work that you've done, particularly in the area of ZZZ research. I have up-to-date skills in XXX-A, XXX-B, and XXX-C. Let's schedule an interview to see how it would be possible for me to contribute to your team.

      --[Signed, hotshot]"


      Sirs,

      When I, a Senior XXX Engineer, applied to your company, XYZ Widgets Inc., your advertisement assured me that I was applying in confidence. Despite that assurance, you have just posted my cover letter verbatim on the Internet (and worse) at Slashdot. You will be hearing from my lawyers.

      Sincerely,

      Ralph Hotshot, Esq.

      ---------
      If you can't get a job from them, sue them!

    2. Re:Never underestimate a good cover letter by T1girl · · Score: 2

      LOL

    3. Re:Never underestimate a good cover letter by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      "I've long had an interest in your company"

      But isn't that going to sound phony when 500 geeks suddenly have a "long interest" in your company?

      I personally would chuck that part. Then again, I have not proven to be a resume expert based on my track record. Getting just the right level of BS without overdoing it is a tricky art.

    4. Re:Never underestimate a good cover letter by Courageous · · Score: 2

      This wasn't meant as a literal template. It was meant as an example. Something appropriately sincere will substitute fine, such "as I have an avid ongoing interest in public key infrastructure, which is one of your areas of work." The purpose here is to demonstrate a commonality and alignment of some kind. Use your imagination, just remember that it has to be very brief in a cover letter.

      C//

  71. Bah. web dev = kobold, not paladin. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not bad, except for that small mistake (and kobolds probably can't have int > 11, web devs either).

  72. Howto get the resume bots to read your resume: by redclaw2048 · · Score: 1

    We all know that when your applying to a job that has a lot of applicants, the company in question wont even read half of the resumes. They will scan them in and have a computer look for key words that they are interested in for a future employee.

    Here is the punch line: When your applying for a job online, throw in a line of text at the end of your resume that consists of about 50 key words that you think employers might like to see on a resume but aren't on yours. For example "I know absolutely nothing about MFC, Java, Microsoft, HTML, insert random high paying skill here". Now highlight it and change its color to the same color as the background color of the page. This only works when you submit your resume via email and in a text format that doesn't make the color change immediately visible. The effect being that the email parsing bots will read your resume and go "WOW this guy/gal is awesome, here boss read this guys resume right away." He/She will then print it up and read it over seeing only the information that you wanted them to see, thus getting you past round one.

    I'm not advocating that people should do this, I just think it's a funny way to beat the system.

    1. Re:Howto get the resume bots to read your resume: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It probably wouldn't hurt to put in "Porn, XXX, Babes, Britney, boobs, lick me" as well.

  73. Re: Jack of all trades by SquadBoy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No some parts of IT tend to be recession-sensitive. The thing is to pick wisely. I can't speak for the coding side of the house having never been there. But I know that in the last few years of slow down. I as a datacomm, network infrastructure, security kind of guy have seen *no* slow down and in the past year have seen a lot of new interest. (Mostly having to do with the security side of things.) The reason so many folks in "IT" are having problems right now is because a large number of them got some kind of a cert during the bubble years and thought they were good to go. Had no love for the profession had no depth had no real understanding. And where in the I can run a windows/*nix server crowd. Well the herd go thinned. Get a good solid deep background then learn as much as possible about *every* aspect of IT and you too will be recession proof.

    --

    Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
  74. Re: Jack of all trades by KenSeymour · · Score: 1

    I have seen a lot of posts like this. They imply that somehow, if you are out of work, you must be
    less qualified than those who are working.

    But a lot of big companies did large layoffs that were in large part random.
    Mangers were given targets to meet for headcount.

    I know of several qualified programmers who are out of work.
    There employment status has nothing to do with their ability.

    Normally, it would be easy for a qualified candidate to find another job quickly.
    But now there are lots and lots of qualified un-employed people and very few jobs (in IT).
    So if you are working, and you think it is because you are hot stuff.
    Lets hope YOUR bubble doesn't get burst.

    --
    "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them." -- Albert Einstein
  75. One more bullet... by OffTheRack · · Score: 1

    1. the area you live in sucks. MOVE.
    2. you aren't nearly as skilled as you think you are.
    3. you aren't nearly as skilled as the -other- applicants are.
    4. You want bubble-boom pay rates. Lower your standard of living.

  76. Re: Jack of all trades by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

    You will of course notice that I state in my post that I don't know anything about the coder side of the house. My statement is purley my observation that network/security guys and no not server admins either, have made if through this fairly well and that if you want a fairly recession proof IT job you might look in that direction. Nothing about anyone else.

    --

    Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
  77. original text from sagewire by EggMan2000 · · Score: 1
    Resumé Writing Tips for Technical People

    In this article I write about some of the most common mistakes that I see on resumés, and how you can avoid them.

    I proofread resumés for friends... a lot. With the economy heating up I'm getting asked to more frequently. I find that technical people often have difficulty "selling" themselves. While "The Practice of System and Network Administration" (co-authored with Christine Hogan) has tips on hiring sysadmins, we didn't include specific resumé-writing tips. Therefore, I thought it might be useful to write down the thoughts I have in this area. (Our negotiation section does have tips on how to negotiate your salary, but that's putting the cart ahead of the horse.) How do employers process resumés?It's important to write your resumé to be useful from the perspective of your potential employer. In writing they say, play to your audience.

    That is, an action film is expected to have an explosion or something major in the first scene, a romance is expected to introduce at least one of the main people in the first 5 minutes, Steven King always includes the elements that his fans expect. A resumé has to be written for its audience too. What are the audiences of a resumé?What makes writing a resumé difficult is that there are two audiences.

    First is the non-technical HR clerk that receives the resumé. If it gets past the clerk, it will arrive at the desk of the person that will be your future boss. Your resumé has to have the elements that will please both of these people: The HR clerk The first person to see your resumé, sadly, is a non-technical clerk who is handed 10,000 resumés a day and a list of positions that need to be filled. This person does the first level of sorting. Your job is to make sure you get through this person's selection criteria. The problem here is that this person doesn't know the difference between UNIX and Solaris, or that if someone knows Solaris 2.5 then they are hirable for a Solaris 2.6 job. Luckily, this person only reads the top part of every resumé, so you make make sure that you have "Objective" and "Skills" sections made just for him/her. Don't say "Solaris 2.6", say "Solaris 2.x" or just "Solaris" (people have forgotten about Solaris 1.x by now).

    The Hiring Manager Each pile that the clerk created is handed to an appropriate "Hiring Manager." This person does understand the technology that you'll be working with, or at least they think they do. The rest of the resumé must be in their language. The most common mistake that I see is that people don't write anything for the clerk. Therefore, their resumé never gets to the hiring manager.

    The "Objective Statement" and "Skills" section at the top of your resumé is what the clerk reads. Make sure your resumé has these sections and make them clear. Typically I see resumés without an "Objective Statement" at all! Tip 1: A good "Objective" statementA good objective statement tells a plainly-stated title you would like ("UNIX programmer", "CGI Developer", "Project Manager", etc.) and a couple skills that you have ("excellent writing skills", "experience with digital audio technology", "experience with large development projects", etc).

    If you aren't sure what your title is called, look at a couple job advertising web sites to fill you in.

    You can also specify what industry or department you want to be in ("financial services", "telecommunication", ".COM", etc.).

    Here are some good ones that I've seen:

    1. Objective: A position as a Senior UNIX/Linux Developer that lets me utilize my years of experience in the TDM cellular technology.
    2. Objective: A position as a Project Manager in the EDA industry that lets me utilize my excellent communication and presentation skills.
    3. Objective: A position as a Junior UNIX/Solaris Sysadmin (SAGE Level II) in the financial services industry that lets me utilize my superior Solaris knowledge.
    4. Objective: An entry-level position as a HP-UX/UNIX Sysadmin that enables me to demonstrate my ability to learn on the job.
    A sample bad objective statement (this is a real example):
    • Objective: I am an expert in building large, scalable services based on open protocols.
    That person didn't get any calls back, even though he had built .COM infrastructures that served literally millions of users email, web services, etc. The person was quite brilliant with technical things, but didn't write a resumé that would get past the clerk: It didn't include any buzzwords or technology that the clerk could recognize nor a tangible position/title that was open.

    How could the clerk classify such a resumé?

    A better statement would have been: "A senior architect of UNIX-based email and web services that lets me utilize my experience in building extremely scalable systems with high up-times." He did change his resumé to something similar, and soon started getting phone calls. Tip 2: A good "Skills" sectionUse buzzwords. There is a reason for them, it makes communication faster. I hate "buzzword compliant" presentations, but only when they aren't adding any value to the statement. When they appear on a resumé they do add value because the clerk undestands them. Better-trained clerks are given a list of synonyms. For example: they might be told "We need a Solaris sysadmin... but that means anyone that mentions Sun, SunOS, or UNIX should be considered. Oh, other synonyms for UNIX are: AIX, Linux, IRIX... a person that knows any of those but wants to learn Solaris is fine for this position." However, that doesn't always happen so it is ok to be a little redundent: I include the word UNIX in addition to the name the vendor uses (i.e. "Solaris/UNIX" or "Red Hat/Linux/UNIX").

    List the best skills first. I see many "skills" sections that list 20 operating systems or 20 languages or 20 vendors and that's a fine way to show that you have a lot of experience over many years. However, the person reading your resumé is only going to read the first 3-4, so make sure those are the ones you want to work in.

    A friend listed the languages she knew in the order she learned them. Which of the these two would a clerk find most useful if he/she was told to find a "Windows C++ programmer"?

    BASIC, Pascal, C-64 BASIC, AppleBasic, Cobal, Fortran, C, awk, C++, Visual C++, Perl
    OR
    Perl, Visual C++, C++, awk, C, Fortran, Cobal, AppleBasic, C-64 Basic, Pascal, BASIC.
    The second list is the more appealing, right?

    While I'm at it, I believe one should delete the super-old technologies like Commodore 64 and Apple II unless, of course, you are applying to work someplace that still uses those technologies.

    A concise way to list skills is to group them. The first example below is the most concise, the others are longer.

    Skills:

    Operating systems: Unix (FreeBSD, Solaris, Linux), Windows 95/98/2000/NT, and others.


    Here are some other good examples of "Skills" listings that I've seen:

    Skills:

    Operating systems: Unix (FreeBSD, Solaris, Linux), Windows 95/98/2000/NT, Cisco IOS 7.x-12.x, plus some experience with AIX, HP-UX, OpenVMS, NetBSD, OpenBSD and others.

    Programming Languages: Perl/CGI/mod_perl, C/C++, HTML, Unix shells and tools, awk/sed, SQL, Python, Pascal, BASIC.

    Network Products: Cisco Routers, Cisco Switches, Cisco PIX Firewalls and Cisco IP Telephony equipment (ICS7750); Checkpoint FW-1; Linux/Unix firewalls (IPFilter, IPFW); Avaya Cajun products; Network General Sniffer, tcpdump, Ethereal, Snort.

    Network Technologies: FastEthernet, Gigabit Ethernet, FDDI, OSPF, BGP, ATM.

    Tip 3: ClassificationsIf you are a sysadmin, use the SAGE Job Classifications to describe yourself and/or the position you are looking for. More and more HR departments are using them, and certainly the cool companies that you want to work for are using them. However, explain enough so that someone that hasn't read http://sageweb.sage.org/resources/publications/8_j obs/ will understand what you mean. That's why the above example was redundant: "a Junior UNIX/Solaris Sysadmin (SAGE Level II)". Tip 4: Pick a good filenameNever use a filename like resume.doc when sending your resumé as an attachment. Name the file something like resume_tom_limoncelli.doc so that if the HR person saves it, he or she will be able to easily tell yours from someone else's...and your resumé won't be overwritten the next time someone else sends them a file called resume.doc. (Thanks to my friend Tina for this tip.) ConclusionA good resumé is your key to finding a new job. However, you'll never find a job if your resumé doesn't reach the right people. Making your "Objective" and "Skills" sections complete and accurate is how you make sure it reaches the right people. Tom Limoncelli is co-author of The Practice of System and Network Administration with Christine Hogan, Director of Network Operations at Lumeta Corp. and maintains www.EverythingSysadmin.com. He can be reached at talsagewire@whatexit.org.

    --
    what? what I thought we were in the trust tree in the nest, were we not?
  78. About the economy... by Andy+Muldowney · · Score: 1

    In response to the comment about the "economy picking up" in this article and people bitching that it's not - well - stop bitching. While not 100% true, I am generally a more happy person knowing how many unskilled workers were filtered out of the working public.

    I have spent time interviewing people coming from everything from startup .coms to Fortune 500s. It boggles my mind that there are so many unskilled workers out there in the industry. With the amount of money that had to have been spent on unqualified labor, it's no wonder the economy is in such a bad condition.

    I now do consulting/retainer work for several companies, including a large Fortune 100. There are literally HUNDREDS of people in the IT department with no discernable skills. It would be so much easier and more cost effective to replace ten of them with one qualified employee.

    That said, my only resume advice is this - keep it short and highlight what your future boss would see as your highest acheivements. They will be in the mindset of looking for items that will ultimately be able to benefit their image to their superiors. Also, some items to show you have a life outside of IT wouldn't hurt either.

    1. Re:About the economy... by Anitra · · Score: 1

      I'm probably one of those people you're complaining about. I'm a college student, working 50+ hours/week on school and as an undergraduate teaching assistant. What can I do to get "skilled"??

      --

      Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
    2. Re:About the economy... by rollingcalf · · Score: 1

      I think the poster is referring to people in the IT field who actually had jobs despite their near-total lack of skills - not undergraduates and recent graduates without experience. I have come across several such people during my career, and I agree that it is actually a good thing for the economy that those people are no longer in the field because they were costing their companies more than they were getting paid.

      But the bad part is that the layoffs have hit both the good and the useless workers, as many companies have gone out of business completely, or large companies did layoffs at random. Now the truly qualified workers' resumes get buried under a mile high pile, and the HR drones don't know how to tell the difference between the pretenders and the real professionals. Not to mention that many good programmers don't know how to put together a good resume, as programming ability and marketing savvy (a resume is "marketing" yourself) have nothing to do with each other.

      --
      ---------
      There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
  79. alright fuckhead... by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 2

    geezus fucking christ you right wing assholes are insane.

    have you ever heard of the fucking "COMMERCE CLAUSE" in the FUCKING CONSTITUTION?!?!?!

    you know the one that says "To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes; "

    how the fuck can this be construed as to being outside of their constitutional duties, asswipe?

    and in my next lesson - why supply side doesnt work.

    fuck head.

    --
    ... hi bingo ...
    1. Re:alright fuckhead... by Tetsujin28 · · Score: 1

      have you ever heard of the fucking "COMMERCE CLAUSE" in the FUCKING CONSTITUTION?!?!?!

      He was talking about the President.

      The Commerce Clause that you quote (in Article I Section 8) sets forth the powers of Congress.

      Have you actually read the "FUCKING CONSTITUTION" you seem so excited about?

      --
      - - - -
      The real Tetsujin 28 is a giant robot.
  80. Syanara IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good suggestion: get the hell out of IT.

    I am tired of fighting with a million other starving cattle for measely scraps of jobs. That is not my style.

    I am somehow getting the hell out of IT one way or another. I like computers, but fuck this meat market where every scuff on my fucking shoe makes or breaks me.

    I refuse to tolerate this anti-dignity any more. I am a human, dammit, not a bottle of Windex in a store.

  81. searching for a job in a different city. by pnutjam · · Score: 1

    I'm seriously considering looking for a job in a city about 5 hours away from the one I currently live in. Any advice? People seem to ignore my resume since I live so far away. I have taken to using a relative's address who lives in this city. Any other suggestions to keep the resume out of the old round file, or network in an unfamiliar city?

    1. Re:searching for a job in a different city. by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Five hours? Of course you are going to be ignored. If you are planning on moving there however, you can say that. Or, get a cell phone with a phone number local to that area or use a fake address. Most companies are very much focused on local people, they don't want to deal with the hassle of you moving let alone having an employee who cannot sleep more than five hours a night.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
  82. don't hurt Tux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't care what the advice givers say, I am not taking the Penguin logo off my resume!

  83. Anyone willing to (constructively) critique? by Jakester2K · · Score: 1

    www.4jobs.com* allows a user to set up a home page with their coverletter, resume, references, and
    even a "QandA" section to (I guess) get the more mundane parts of an interview out of the way.

    If you've got something constructive to say, you're welcome to surf to:

    www.4jobs.com/evanrichter

    and email the address found there to let me know what you think.

    If you REALLY like it, are hiring, and you're in Portland, please don't hesitate to give me a call!


    * I am not now, nor have I ever been, associated in any way with 4Jobs -- except as a user!

  84. ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    'Course, I'm not sure how much I believe the economy speeding up - but still good information.,

    I hope you don't write your resume like you wrote your submission.

  85. Re:You belong in academia. The point he is making by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that MANY people who go out and pass the test still can't apply that book knowledge to the real world. Passing A+ doesn't mean anything unless you also have spent ALOT of time troubleshooting systems. Passing a Microsoft test doesn't mean you really can DO anything practical. The tests are not designed to show amount of real experience a person has with a product except for say RH or cisco tests.
    end of rant.
    But certs are a marketing edge especially when the interviewer doesn't understand the position that you are trying to get.

  86. Re:Things I've Noticed... Having lived in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Appearance is EVERYTHING and so Certifications mean EVERYTHING in Asia.

  87. marketing your self? by ryochiji · · Score: 1
    > it has to do with marketing your self

    Apparently some humans are marketable...just like that can of soup or bottle of shampoo. Maybe slavery was abolished because they realized that some people will sell themselves.

    Yes, I know what was meant, but it still makes me shudder when people talk about "marketing" them selves...

  88. Ever wondered *why* you're not getting jobs? by Vainglorious+Coward · · Score: 1

    If a job applicant can't even take the time to tailor the resume to the job I'm offering them, then why should I bother reading it?

    Speaking as a person who's been looking since the end of April, I find myself getting very, very tired of customizing even cover letters for a job opportunity. I don't bother with customizing the resume anymore.

    Your practice of not customizing obviously hasn't worked for you these last five months, so why are you offering this bad suggestion to others? Tailoring your application to the position is absolutely *vital*. When I'm recruiting, I want to see a cover letter that addresses what I'm looking for, before I even look at the resume. I also expect the resume to be arranged in such a way as to highlight the specific skills and experiences I've requested in the position posting. I don't care whether you have an "Objective" field or not, provided that if you do have one, it's not a lame "to get this job" type inanity. Likewise with hobbies - use your judgment as to whether listing a particular non-work interest will add value to the application. Most always, listing hobbies is a waste of time.

    As you admit in your third paragraph, you're mostly sending off standardised letters to positions you're not even that interested in. Has it not occurred to you that this is plainly evident to the recruiters?

    If you think you can craft a good application letter and resume in 30 mins you're mistaken. My advice would be to concentrate your applications on the positions you want. Read the posting carefully (it's amazing the percentage of applications I throw straight in the bin because it's obvious from the first paragraph that the applicant hasn't even bothered to more than skim the posting). Do some research on the company. Then write a cover letter that states succinctly why you think you're the best candidate for the position. This doesn't need to be an essay - one or two well written sentences will get you that interview. Finally, you may need to tweak your resume to highlight specific areas. This should take way less time than writing the cover letter, since your resume is already written and is only two pages.

    Mostly though, this is not about design and layout (very subjective, as you say, although terrible design obviously doesn't help) it's about communication. If a candidate is not able to write a cover letter that states plainly why they should be considered for the position, then they don't get considered. Conversely, I've also called candidates in for interview based on an excellent cover letter, even when the resume was very mundane or even missing a skill or two.

    --
    My next sig will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush
  89. Skill Order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    List the best skills first.

    Other experts will tell you to list skills in alphabetical order. This way, a screener can quickly locate the skill they are looking for.

    Your "best skills" should shine in the Experience section of your resume.

    Additional Tips:

    The article suggests naming your resume file something like resume_firstname_lastname.doc to make your file easier to identify after the HR person saves it. Good tip.

    Take it a step further. Include your name in the subject line of the email message sent with your resume attachment. This way, your message will be easier to identify amongst the hundreds or thousands of other applicants.

    Send a file format more universal than .doc (assuming MS Word), but also a format the HR screener is likely to have a reader for, such as .pdf. Or send both.

    Or, don't bother with the attachment. Send a link to your resume. Who wants a mailbox flooded with MB of resumes, most of which are useless? When sending links include multiple format links.

    Examples:

    • View
    • Firstname Lastname's resume in Microsoft Word 97.

    • View
    • Firstname Lastname's resume in Microsoft Word 2000.

    • View
    • Firstname Lastname's resume as a Web Page (HTML).

    • View
    • Firstname Lastname's resume in Portable Document Format (PDF).

    ...and so forth.

  90. Bear Market != Recession by helix400 · · Score: 1
    1) Interest rates are the lowest they've been in over 40 years.
    2) We're in the longest bear market in 60 years.
    ...Being unemployed in a righteous republican family makes me wonder how I'm still alive..."

    Let me get this logic straight. If the stock market goes down...the economy isn't growing...and therefore you wont get a job?

    Perhaps my glass is 3/4 full, but when I watch CNBC, this is what I hear:

    Unemployment is at a healthy rate of 5.7%, and is expected to drop more.

    The GDP is growing, at 1.3% last year, and is expected to increase.

    Interest rates are at a 40 year low (yes, that's a wonderful thing, it lets you get cheaper loans on houses, cars, etc.)

    And all of this despite a bear market! You wonder how you're still alive? Its because you're living in the world's econimic superpower...and its economy is getting better.
    Your problem lies in misunderstanding how the real world works. The bear market and low interest rates didn't suck IT jobs away, it was because investors ran out of money to keep fueling the dotcom fad. If you can't find a job in the oversaturated IT industry, consider a different field. Unfortunately, from here on out, there's always going far too many computer geeks out there than there are $50K IT jobs.

    1. Re:Bear Market != Recession by xyzzy-ladder · · Score: 1

      A 5.7 unemployment rate is "healthy"? How so? An "unemployment rate" means that there are more people looking for jobs than jobs, hence it's a buyer's market for work.

      Since the vast majority of Americans (like 98%) make almost all of their money from their job (not investments) it seems it would be healthier to have an "overemployment rate" of 5% or so. In a seller's market for work, companies would have to pay higher salaries, better benefits, and guarentee more rights at work, to recruit from the limited supply or workers.

      That would mean investors (the people who make the majority of their money from investments, not their job), about 2% of Americans, would make less money, and the people working jobs (98% of Americans) would make more money.

      --
      There are two types of people; those who divide people into two types of people, and those who don't.
    2. Re:Bear Market != Recession by helix400 · · Score: 1
      Good points. Although I'm not an economist, I have heard some answers to your questions.

      There is a healthy range of unemployement rate. It can't be too high or too low. A 5.7% unemployment is healthy as far as the economy is concerned. As far as being one of the unemployed 5.7%, it sucks. I remember in my state a few years ago, the unemployment rate was between 2%-3%, and it caused all sorts of problems. Like you said, the average joe loved it because places like McDonalds were hiring for $8 or $9 bucks an hour. But businesses hated it, all the talented workers were gone...they couldn't operate as well. (I know, we tried to hire employees at our company. We couldn't find anyone who came close to meeting our needs, but we were so desperate for labor, we hired the 2 best slackers out of the bunch).

      Since employers are just as important as employees from the economy's standpoint, there has to be a happy medium unemployment level. 6%-7% gets too high, 4% on down gets too low. Our economy demands that there is sufficient pool of unemployed people floating around for businesses. But not too big, or else unemployed people will never find work.

      I do agree with you that I'd sure love to have an "overemployment rate". Its one of the hardest things to see a close friend or neighbor who can't find a job when their kids need money for food and clothes. I wish Americans were more idealistic and could work together to make sure everyone had a job.

    3. Re:Bear Market != Recession by xyzzy-ladder · · Score: 1

      Healthy for who? For you? You say it sucks to be one of those unemployed, well, maybe it would suck to be one of those businesses who can't get workers cheap.

      Why does employment have to be negative, always in favor of the employer? Why can't it be positive, in favor of the employee?

      There are winners and losers in an economy. The only question is who will be the winners. So far, it hasn't been us employees, or 98% of Americans. On the other hand, that 2% has made out great.

      You sound sympathetic to the plight of unemployed workers. That's great. If I were unemployed (and I could be any day) sympathy won't pay the rent. I'll take a positive employment rate, thanks.

      --
      There are two types of people; those who divide people into two types of people, and those who don't.
    4. Re:Bear Market != Recession by spanky555 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well supposedly, we had "overemployment" a few years back in the "IT industry", and that brought on the H-1B system. So, if the situation ever becomes in favor of employees, companies can lobby politicians to rig it in their favor instead - notice the reverse doesn't happen.

  91. Re:Ever wondered *why* you're not getting jobs? by namespan · · Score: 2

    Your practice of not customizing obviously hasn't worked for you these last five months, so why are you offering this bad suggestion to others? Tailoring your application to the position is absolutely *vital*.

    I should have given a little bit more information. I spent more time tailoring from May through July. The most response I got from any organization was an automated "Thank you... we've received... we'll keep you on file" response. I spent DAYS researching some of these companies, looking up Forrester and Gartner Group reports, scouring their websites, even emailing some companies who used the product made by the company I was trying to get a job at. Lots of serious investment, no return.

    Starting in August, I decided to "play the numbers" -- I sent out more resumes and cover letters, spent less time researching and customizing. I got actual responses from human beings and three interviews. That's what makes me think this tactic is more effective.

    Now, the investment I made up front in spending lots of time writing and rewriting cover letters those first few months is a part of what makes me able to dash off a cover letter in under and hour. I've written the "how my skills and background can work for you" part of a letter so many times that I don't need to spend much time thinking about it anymore, unless the position I'm applying for is off the beaten path and unusually interesting.

    Bottom line: the second approach has gotten me more interviews, the job of a resume and cover letter. The carefully tailored approach wasted time. I now do my careful research and preparation before the interview.

    --
    Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
  92. Clarification Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do Slashdot posts qualify as published papers?

  93. Resume advice! by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 3, Informative

    Know your audience. The type of job you are searching for should form your resume. It should also emphasize your strengths.

    Sadly, when employers hire these days, they can truly pick among the best. Out of fourty people who applied for a temporary position I'm hiring for, seven are so talented and well fit that I'm almost down to tossing a die.

    Anyhow, you should also make a good application. Write briefly about what skills in your resume you think will enable you to do a good job.

    That's all I can tell you. The rest is probably position specific. Tailor yourself to the position as far as possible.

    --

    Stop the brainwash

  94. Re:Don't lie... (Author comment) by famazza · · Score: 1
    • Note: it IS a joke.

    Lawyers/sales people please don't be offended. I know that if you lie you never get a job :o)

    Have fun :oD
    No stress!

    --

    -=-=-=-=
    I know life isn't fair, but why can't it ever be un-fair in MY favor!?
  95. Steve by Bud · · Score: 2

    Oh my, has Apple's Switch Campaign finally got to Steve Jobs himself? I heard that his pay was lousy, like 1USD/year, but recently he got a 40M USD bonus so that should have taken care of his itch to switch. So he's now top monkey at Microsoft, right? I heard they needed someone to keep Ballmer company.

    "My name is Steve Jobs, and I run a fruit company..."

    *grin* *duck* *run*

  96. I misunderstood. by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 3, Funny
    The article was titled:

    Resume Tips For Jobs

    Here I was, thinking Steve had quit and needed help on his resume!

    I had so many good suggestions, too!

    --
    Murphy was an optimist.
  97. Slashdotters in search of unemployment by thedave · · Score: 1
    During these trying times, I find myself in the all to
    familiar situation of being over-employed. With the
    scarcity of people that do what I do and the number
    of projects looming on the horizon, I just can't manage
    to find the time to take off.


    Any recommendations on recruiting habits, and work
    habits to help me out of this bad situation?

    --
    [ .sig removed due to death threats from zealots who seek to control me out of fear for their hidden d
  98. coders vs. network (was: Jack of all trades) by Tablizer · · Score: 2
    You will of course notice that I state in my post that I don't know anything about the coder side of the house. My statement is purley my observation that network/security guys

    Security *is* one of the few areas that seems to be strong these days. It may be because of 9/11 fears, or just more viruses and hacking. (Maybe all the unemployeed IT people are hacking around.)
    Maybe we can all work out a mutual deal where 1/2 hacks into stuff, scare PHB's, and break custom software, then the other half are hired to plug the holes and fix things. The employed half then shares some income with the hacking half. After all, this is what our government does: cause trouble oversees to get work for the military who then contribute to compaigns :-)
    The coding side seems really down right now. About 1/2 of all coding is normally for medium-term stuff. When the economy is slow, medium-term projects often get canceled. That means that coder demand could drop to 1/2 of what it is usually at.

    You don't really need coders to keep things "as is" in a company, except occasional bug fixes. Thus, a company may keep just one programmer on staff where before they had multiple.

    Stalled business just don't need nor want coders. It is just not an immediate need for them beyond a skeleton staff.
  99. H-1B street protest anyone? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    For example, MS is 85% immigrants and H-1B Visa workers

    I am very willing to participate in an anti-H1B protest. I am in a mood to yell in the streets, but preferably not by myself.

    Anybody else out there up for it?

    1. Re:H-1B street protest anyone? by xtremex · · Score: 2

      I do it now...I support the anti-H1B visa program (Not completely, but the US has made the immigrant influx at an all time high)
      Go to http://www.projectusa.org for information on this movement.

      --
      If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
    2. Re:H-1B street protest anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you cunt! When our country wanted ppl its ok to go and hire them and now we dont want them its ok to just ship them back. I dont think so.

      Just because you are stupid and can't find a job, dont blame it on other people

    3. Re:H-1B street protest anyone? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      When our country wanted ppl its ok to go and hire them and now we dont want them its ok to just ship them back. I dont think so.

      It was cheap-ass greedy companies that wanted them, not workers (voters). We were hoodwinked by the political system. Lobbying groups created bull about an "IT shortage" to sway votes and improve bribes (donations) in congress.

      I *never* wanted them.

    4. Re:H-1B street protest anyone? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I do it now...I support the anti-H1B visa program

      Letter writing is about as effective as resumes are these days.

      We need street marches that make the papers.

    5. Re:H-1B street protest anyone? by spanky555 · · Score: 1

      It was *always* set up that they'd go home anyway, dumbass. 3 years, one renewal, for a total of six years. That's all the H-1B allows.

  100. Not exactly new, but it bears repeating... by baine · · Score: 1

    I went through a similar process described in the article when I moved to Utah last year at this time.

    I knew at the time that things weren't going to be as easy as they had before (The last couple of jobs I'd had, I cleaned out one office on Friday, and moved into a new one the next Monday), and Utah was an especially tough market (fewer jobs, and more experienced techies to compete with - not to mention the whole LDS 'inside track' - but that's a different story...).

    I realized pretty quick that I needed to really sharpen my resume; not just so that it got across the pertinent facts that I had the skills necessary for the job, but my resume needed to get noticed above and beyond the 10 other equally qualified techs.

    Many people will tell you that an objective is crap; this is not so. Think of it as a mini-cover letter. Make your objective custom tailored to each type of position you want to apply (i.e. do a different one for the resume you use to apply for 'programmer' positions than the one you use for 'web developer' jobs). Yes, this means you will end up with various versions of your resume. I had, in all, 5 different versions.

    Also, make sure your cover letter explicitly responds to the requests made in the hiring ad. Whether the person reading your cover letter is technical or not, what they really want to know, and in as few words as possible, is if you will fit their needs. Address their needs, tell them (very briefly) that you've solved similar problems before, or have other applicable experience/skills. As I made my Resume's objective tailored to the position; I made my coverletter tailored to the specific company. Yes, this means writing (or selectively editing) a lot of cover letters - one for each application, if you're smart.

    Lastly, I had to change the way I looked for jobs. I noticed, at least in Utah (and this is true in other places as well), that web sites such as monster and hotjobs.com had fallen out of favor. This is probably because the local companies were reallyo only interested in local candidates, and not interested in paying headhunter's fees (headhunters still dominate some online job boards) when there's so much local talent laying around. I found the local paper (imagine that) to be my best source of job leads.

    The bottom line is, folks; it's a different job market out there now than it was even just 18 months ago. It's time to get your game on, get hip to the strategies that work, and dump those that don't. Otherwise, you'll find yourself working in a place where your name is on your shirt, and not on your desk.

    --
    Need a simple, easy to use data tier generator? http://www.gryphinsoftware.com/
  101. It ain't braggin'... by Party+Remover · · Score: 1

    ...if you can back it up. Besides, the other guy called him out on it.

    1. Re:It ain't braggin'... by blank_coil · · Score: 1

      It ain't braggin' if you can back it up.

      Of course it's still bragging. Bragging without being able to prove it is called "lying."

      --
      No sig for you.
  102. Re:Ever wondered *why* you're not getting jobs? by 2short · · Score: 1

    "the second approach has gotten me more interviews, the job of a resume and cover letter."

    But are they interviews for jobs you really want and are particularly well suited to? That you research the companies is great, you're way ahead of the masses. But the point of the research should be to reject companies that aren't a good match, and not even bother sending them a resume. All that said, the lots of resumes approach may be the way to go with big companies. I wouldn't know, I hate big companies. For small companies, or at least the one I'm now at (and occasionally read resumes for) a customized resume is essential. Just to throw in my own appocryphal (sp?) evidence- My last job hunt lasted a month and I wound up with a job I love. I sent out exactly one resume after spending a day and a half on the cover letter. The cover letter detailed why this was the perfect job for me, and I the perfect candidate for the job well enough that my boss has since admitted he didn't read my resume until after arranging the interview.

  103. unicode by Michael+Wardle · · Score: 2, Funny

    For those in the audience using anything more advanced than 7 bit ASCII, the correct spelling is résumé.

  104. Re:Ever wondered *why* you're not getting jobs? by namespan · · Score: 2

    But are they interviews for jobs you really want and are particularly well suited to?

    One was nigh unto perfect for me. The other two were merely good fits. I generally don't apply for a job unless I know it's going to be somewhere where I'll contribute and enjoy putting skills to work.

    My last job hunt lasted a month and I wound up with a job I love. I sent out exactly one resume after spending a day and a half on the cover letter. The cover letter detailed why this was the perfect job for me, and I the perfect candidate for the job

    Would you mind posting the text? OK, emailing it? :)

    --
    Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
  105. Important mistake not to make by Random+Hamster · · Score: 1

    Do not misspell software on the resume.

    I have seen 'soft ware' and 'SoftWare'.

    Normally I do not care much about spelling on resumes but you have to draw the line somewhere...

  106. Re:Don't lie... (Author comment) by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

    my uncle did it. He applied for a sales position, and he had no experience, so he completely fabricated his resume and experience and got hired as a sales position, and he worked there for 15+ years!

    --
    Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
  107. An idea I never tried :) by DEBEDb · · Score: 1

    But wanted to. Seeing as how probably
    the majority require resume in Word format,
    I wanted to send some recruiters an "interactive"
    resume (with some macros, etc). Not at all
    malicious code, just highlighting in some
    ways various sections, etc. It was a sorta
    "hey, look at me!" thing.

    Granted, it's a gamble. It may piss someone off.
    But on average, I'd rather have one person be
    angry at it, and one love it, than both just
    filing it with the others.

    Since I got a job at least for now, I'm letting
    this idea out there ;)

    --

    Considered harmful.
  108. The purpose of a resume is to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    ...get an interview ?

    I've rarely read a resume that accurately reflected what a person did or could do. A cocky genius would write a crappy resume and be a pain in the neck to work with, but they might do some great stuff.
    Insecure, introspective, aspergic people also often write sad resumes but that doesn't mean anything. Is the employer looking for a wizard, or a fork-lift driver ?

    ... get you off the ground ?

    If you don't have a network of people to help you land a sure thing and are reduced to applying with a resume that matters, then you're in pretty bad shape. Be humbled when alone in the wilderness. Carefully determine what the employer wants and then be it. Do the same thing when meeting big bears in the forest.

    ...convince an employer that you will and can do anything they want you to do ?

    What's the point of the "Objectives" section ? Most employers don't really care what YOU want to do; they want a handle on you, they want to know what kind of carrot to put in front of you. Make it easy for them. If they find out the handle on their mug is broken ...

    ... stand out in a crowd ?

    Some scouting employers don't know what they really want, they may have a vague idea and are just looking for some free direction from people they don't intend to hire at all. Tease them with vague ideas but don't give them anything solid unless they hire you.


    Some people are classifiable as "generalists" in the sense they can do just about anything very fast on the uptake, but probably not as well as someone who's been working for 5 years doing one thing. In these quickly changing times, being a generalist may be the way to go, but there's no way easy to say you are flexible without appearing weak and flimsy except by listing a large number of things that you've worked on, none of which you are an expert on. In that case, you might consider saying that you "managed" these projects rather that worked on them.


    Good luck.

  109. And the cover letter gets you through the HR gate by geekotourist · · Score: 2
    The CL also is the key that gets your resume through the gate (HR) to the castle (hiring manager). HR often doesn't fully understand the technical reqs of a job: the CL explicitly links your skills to the reqs.

    My CL's, which have helped get me interviews (no job, yet) are a form of T-resume.

    My 1st paragraph is short: "saw your ad in X for a Y at Z corp. Here is how I match your requirements:"

    Then I have a list of skills or projects, each one directly matching a requirement listed in the ad. I choose 5 (or 6 if they are short) from a set of 30 different descriptions I have used over time. Because these are pre-written, I can put together a decent cover letter in 20-30 minutes. The last paragraph is a standard closing paragraph.

    Within 10 seconds of starting to read the CL, the reader knows several things:

    • 1. I read the ad: this isn't a spam resume.
    • 2. My CL (and, I hope they assume, resume) was adapted for them: I care about making it easy for them to see I'm qualified.
    • 3. I'm qualified with regards to skills and background.

    I don't add anything about how I'd be an asset or other general statements- those statements are too obvious and takes up room on the CL (and time in the reader's brain) Better to spend that time on capturing their attention.

  110. You're not getting "conflicting" information by jeko · · Score: 1

    You're getting different reports from different sources who are looking at different perspectives of the same overall situation.

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  111. Would you like some Certs with your Whine ? by grubert · · Score: 1

    My only beef about Certs ( MCSEs specifically, ) is how they get in the way when you need to fix something, defensivly spouting nonsense.

  112. Include your Gender, Race, and Ethnicity ! by The_THOMAS · · Score: 1

    Include your Gender, Race, and Ethnicity on any electronic resume.

    I know it doesn't sound right but the fact is employers are required to keep records of these figures for prospective 'job applicants'. When the law was enacted, the employer would simply write this info on a resume as the person came in to apply. Now they get so many electronic resumes they either have to hire someone to call the applicants who did not include the info or round-file it.

    I just recently learned this from a Seattle Times article this weekend; Online résumés are taxing employers.

    Now I'm just trying to figure out a tasteful way of including this info in my own resume; as a footnote? in the header?

    --
    Ya Sure! You Betcha!, The_THOMAS
  113. Oh, the humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    reports that with the economy speeding up, more and more people are freshening up their resumés.

    ROFL!!

    Vaya con Dios, man...

    Anyone who seriously thinks they can raise a family/maintain a home on a W-4 salary after watching the last four years really needs a ticket out of fantasyland. Every single job app is one stupid manager away from another round of destroyed credit, destroyed retirement savings and reposession of everything they own.

    Don't believe it? Who's going to stop your manager from firing your a**? You? HR? Who? Yeah, that's what I thought.

    If you still believe one single %#(*&@%) word that comes out of those idiot middle managers' mouths after ALL THIS, you're a fool.

  114. Hiring for the future needs a solid past base. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I can't know what you can do unless I know what you have done before.

    For me the most important part is past experience, that tells me very quickly who should be called for an interview and who should not.

    If what you want to do is in line wuth what we want to do, all the power to you, but first I want to make sure you will be able to deliver. Past experience tells me if you can or not.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  115. smart headhunters by vbrtrmn · · Score: 1

    yeah, but they are all sacrificially killed.

    --
    it's a sig, wtf?
  116. Re: Jack of all trades by ErikZ · · Score: 2

    Wow, all you have to do is know everything?

    I'm surprised more people don't do this!

    --
    Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  117. Top things people must adhere to! by rjbrown99 · · Score: 1

    1. Resume is no longer than 2 pages. This is an absolute must.

    2. Write a cover letter. Don't send me a random resume to the hr@ email address with no letter. Send a physical copy of your resume as well. Yes, it's more difficult but it shows that you took the time to do it and are really interested in the job.

    3. Wear a suit to the interview. No matter what. If you don't wear a suit, you are instantly disqualified as a candidate.

    4. Bring a pen, paper, 3 copies of your resume, a copy of your references, and a writing/coding sample if you have one. I can't overstate the importance of being prepared.

    5. Take notes. It doesn't matter if you are interested in what you are writing. Just write something.

    6. WRITE A PHYSICAL FOLLOW-UP LETTER AND MAIL IT RIGHT AWAY. Write and send this the same day. If you could not answer a question in the interview, look up the answer and put it in this letter. There is NO better way to impress a potential employer.

    I've interviewed TONS of tech candidates and less than 1% of candidates followed these simple steps. Of course, we've ended up hiring that 1% and the rest are still out there looking.

    Why do all of this? Because you need to set yourself apart from the other candidates. Here is a secret that employers know: Overcoming gaps in technical skills is easy. Overcoming bad work habits is difficult to impossible. You need to prove that you have great work habits to get in the door.

    Just my $0.02.

  118. I'm hiring..... by rew · · Score: 2

    Things that "turn me off":

    - a 10-year gap in your "activities". Either educational or in the work section. You'd better have a good explanation, and it better show on the resume: You won't get invited to tell me in person.

    - Highly under-qualified work. College graduate person swapping tapes for example. Either you were very desparate for a job because everybody else was turning you down, or they figured out that that was all you were good for after a week or so, so that's what you ended up doing. It's certainly a hint when other people were declining someone a job....

    - Not listing your mother tongue as a "language you master".

    I'm currently interviewing people for a job: Technical, hardware/software, you have to work in Delft, The Netherlands. EE/CS college degree. Linux(unix) expertise very much a bonus. Company: Harddisk-recovery.com, send CVs to r.e.wolff@harddisk-recovery.com .

    Roger.

  119. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    Real computer scientists don't write code. They occasionally tinker with
    `programming systems', but those are so high level that they hardly count
    (and rarely count accurately; precision is for applications).

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...