Slashdot Mirror


Indian State Switches to Linux

pamri writes "In a pleasant and surprising move, the Indian state of Madhya Pradesh, has opted to switch to Linux from Microsoft for its Gyandooth (intranet in Dhar district connecting rural cybercafes catering to the everyday needs of the masses) programme. What is more surprising is that the state's Chief Minister Digvijay Singh personally conveyed this to Bill Gates. A choice quote: 'For us it is not a question of Microsoft versus Linux. It is just a matter of choosing between a free software and a monopoly. We feel that when we are putting public information out in the open, then it should not be through a proprietary software.'"

541 comments

  1. Plain economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    IT is just cheaper on Linux and old hardware. Which the country of India has plenty of.

    1. Re:Plain economics by rovingeyes · · Score: 3, Insightful
      IT is just cheaper on Linux and old hardware. Which the country of India has plenty of

      1) If India has anything in plenty it is people. Even though there are lot of techies from India, on a average one computer is share by atleast 3 guys in schools. And as far as I know I have never seen an Indian throw away stuff just becoz it is old.

      2)Your notion of IT being cheap on Linux is very wrong. In fact if not properly implemented you will end up investing a lot on IT, just for the simple reason that you need linux admins who are good (considering that it is for govt). Even then administring linux is not as simple as windows.

    2. Re:Plain economics by Jason+Earl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Labor is cheap in India, especially compared to software licenses. Not to mention the fact that the government gets to tax Indian wages, where money send to Redmond is gone from India's economy.

      Besides, at least here in the States, Linux admins don't make more than Windows admins. The studies I have seen show that the pay is quite comparable.

    3. Re:Plain economics by oliverthered · · Score: 2

      Umm... Windows was hard to configure 'last time i looked'
      Everything was through the UI with no option to save diffs that you could roll out.

      Direct UI's are for people who don't know what there doing, you should always use a delta and roll out plan.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    4. Re:Plain economics by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Your notion of IT being cheap on Linux is very wrong. In fact if not properly implemented you will end up investing a lot on IT, just for the simple reason that you need linux admins who are good (considering that it is for govt). Even then administring linux is not as simple as windows.

      Configuring Unix for security is harder than windows because windows offers you niceties such as the group policy editor and heavy use of ACLs. While various linux filesystems support ACLs, no one is using them yet. I'm sure it's coming, though, which will go a long way towards ease of administration.

      On the other hand, it's pretty easy to write some simple scripts, institute logrotation, and so on which will make Linux (or any other Unix) fairly self-maintaining. In my experience the Unix system administrator's job tends towards hardware maintenance and upgrades, and software upgrades, but very little maintenance beyond keeping up with security. Various Linux distributions have offered a number of methods for solving this problem. I personally prefer gentoo's, and if you did a little work on the gentoo build system and an automounter config, you could do frequent centralized updates with it; Of course various other distributions actually have systems in place to do these things for you, as they are shipped. This is just an example of the simpler, smaller tools which come from the Unix mindset (reusability through pipes) making system automation much easier.

      A basic Linux distribution is in no way more complicated than windows. In many ways it is simpler; No mucking with the registry and all the pain that it entails is a big step in the right direction. Linux had journaling filesystems before NT, too, and it has faster and more advanced filesystems now (though who can say what is in store for NTFS in the future?) In the end Linux's primary attractions are twofold; The first is that it is free(beer) and the other that it is free(speech). To most of the world, those things are significant in that order, as well.

      Unix tends to just work. Windows tends to have little bells and whistles (like a *usually responsive gui which also happens to be easy to use and does a hell of alot) but you don't need those things to do work. There are various adequate file managers for Unix which let you get real work done without bloat. They don't do everything Windows does, but you don't need to. The glitz and glimmer of windows is nothing but candy. I like to eat candy (Mostly in the form of Tactical Ops and Mechwarrior IV) so I still run Windows XP on the desktop, and Linux as an appliance...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Plain economics by phsolide · · Score: 5, Informative
      Even then administring linux is not as simple as windows.

      How do you figure? We've all encountered the fact that MSFT products just aren't documented or the documentation is inadequate or just plain wrong. We've all encountered mysterious Blue Screens of Death. We've all encountered Windows 95 and 98 machines that are dying of cruft buildup. We've all encountered "magic" GUI applications that don't have a command line counterpart. We've all encountered installs that require reboots (I had to reboot my Win2K box just to upgrade AIM recently). Just reasoning from first principles, I can say that administering an number of Linux machines will be easier than administering the same number of Windows machines - the admin won't have to physically show up at a linux machine unless something is really wrong with it.

      Very honestly, I think that administering a number of Linux machines (number greater than 5) will end up easier and cheaper than the same number of Windows machines.

      I'd love to see some "plain economics" rebutting this. As near as I can tell, real information that exists contradicts your position:

      I'm calling "FUD" on your position.

      --
      Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
    6. Re:Plain economics by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2

      Even then administring linux is not as simple as windows

      These kinds of statements are what turns people away from adopting Linux.

      Linux is just as easy to administer as Windows. It's just the playing field looks different. Telling someone to the contrary just helps them make an easy decision not to try, even though they might very well be capable of administering Linux if they set their mind to doing so.

      I got to where I am in IT by a hands-on, do it yourself approach. I never listened to anyone who told me it can't be done, or that's it's too difficult. I at least had the guts to figure it out for myself. Big deal if it didn't work. An awful lot can be learned in the attempt.

      ANYBODY can install and administer Linux. There are plenty of resources (HOW-TOs) to allow someone who can read and follow directions to learn the skills of Linux administration. But POSITIVE reinforcement in everyday statements is what helps people decide to take on the challenge.

      Saying linux is not as simple as windows is proving that you never used any of the many GUI applications for administration that work like the windows GUI administration apps.

      There will still be a learning curve for something new to anybody. Windows isn't any easier by true comparison to someone who is *NEW* to the windows concept. There's still people who think they know how to use their windows computer, but still can't do something as simple as drag and drop or adjust the sound volume without using the knob on their speakers.

    7. Re:Plain economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are crass. And an asshole to boot. That game (Custer's Revenge) was an abomination. Fucking racist.

    8. Re:Plain economics by wolvenwraith · · Score: 0

      Ha.. I read part (didn't bother reading all of it) of the reasons Microsoft posted to use windows instead of Linux. I saw quite a few of the statements were either BS or left out something very Critical (such as benchmarks of Samba and Windows Servers). Nice read however, and shows that you can never trust Micro$oft.

      --
      Civilization at it's best! www.hydratech.org
    9. Re:Plain economics by blakestah · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Configuring Unix for security is harder than windows because windows offers you niceties such as the group policy editor and heavy use of ACLs. While various linux filesystems support ACLs, no one is using them yet. I'm sure it's coming, though, which will go a long way towards ease of administration.

      This is nice if you are trying to protect your system from your own users.

      However, if you are interested in protected it from remote attacks, linux is MUCH easier. Iptables (for firewalling) is built in for free, and scripts to configure it are freely available. Security updates are quickly available and easy to apply. Linux wins, it is a no brainer.

      A competent admin can make either OS secure, from local or remote attack. My subjective estimate is that Unix/linux admins can handle far more boxes per person than Windows admins, though.

    10. Re:Plain economics by MadAhab · · Score: 2

      No, linux is as simple to administer correctly as windows. But when you fuck up a windows box, you can throw your hands in the air and say "whaddayagonnado?". Plus, you can *pretend* to administer windows more easily: it's better to use for total fakers.

      --
      Expanding a vast wasteland since 1996.
    11. Re:Plain economics by quantum+bit · · Score: 3, Interesting

      (I had to reboot my Win2K box just to upgrade AIM recently)

      Don't believe it. Most installers are stupid. When they say the need to reboot, just ignore them (kill the process through task manager if they don't give you a choice).

      I got 60-140+ day uptimes back when I was running Win2k by doing this. Everything that claimed it needed a reboot worked fine without it -- except for MS security patches :*(

    12. Re:Plain economics by Matey-O · · Score: 5, Insightful
      We've all encountered the fact that MSFT products just aren't documented or the documentation is inadequate or just plain wrong. We've all encountered mysterious Blue Screens of Death. We've all encountered Windows 95 and 98 machines that are dying of cruft buildup. We've all encountered "magic" GUI applications that don't have a command line counterpart.

      We've all encountered Samba, Sendmail, and Kernel panics too. We've encountered varying ways of bringing up Runlevels, frontends that configure stuff, but you don't know WHERE it configures 'em.

      Pot, I'd like you to meet kettle, BTW, you're both black.

      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    13. Re:Plain economics by tzanger · · Score: 1

      Your notion of IT being cheap on Linux is very wrong. In fact if not properly implemented you will end up investing a lot on IT, just for the simple reason that you need linux admins who are good (considering that it is for govt). Even then administring linux is not as simple as windows.

      Um, "not properly implemented," ANY IT infrastructure will cost a lot. That's not specific to Linux. Just because Win32 is simple get running quickly doesn't mean you don't end up paying a lot to keep it running smoothly. You need just as competent an admin for proper Win32 administration as you do for Linux administration. The difference, I think, is that Windows gives the illusion that it is easy to be a master admin, which it certainly is not. This, in my opinion, leads to many more cases of "well he looked like he knew what he was up to, now we're going to have to spend $x to fix it right" in the Win32 world (especially with Access or SQL Server), than you ever find in Unix.

    14. Re:Plain economics by rseuhs · · Score: 2
      administring linux is not as simple as windows

      In my experience, Linux is much less time-intensive to administer than Windows, especially on larger installations.

      With Windows you constantly have to worry about Registry-rotting, Viruses and patches.

      With Linux you have occasionally worry about patches and never about a registry and viruses.

      Please note that: occasionally < constantly

      Windows is easy to set up. It's easy, but time consuming to add all the needed additional software: Office suite, ICQ, AIM, zip-utility, a browser that doesn't suck, multiple desktop support and much, much more.

      Linux (at least SuSE or Mandrake) is easy to set up and comes with a pretty complete work environment. You will probably need only one or 2 extra software packages, if at all. Gentoo and Debian are harder to set up but even easier to keep up todate.

      If you don't need some Win32-only software, Linux is the way to go. Always. Also on the desktop.

    15. Re:Plain economics by Tony-A · · Score: 2

      Plus, you can *pretend* to administer windows more easily: it's better to use for total fakers.
      "I resemble that remark." I am not a TOTAL faker.
      Microsoft is much easier to set up with something that kinda-sorta works. But beware if you try to make it do what *you* want it to do. If *you* want to be in control, Linux (or *BSD) is much, much easier.

    16. Re:Plain economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are mistaken.
      Labour is not cheaper in India. For US Amercians it is, but not for Indians.
      Specialists can work almost all over the world (H1B-Visa or something like that comes to mind), so they earn competetive wages.
      In numbers, their wages may be lower, but compare it to the local prices and wages, and then they earn a fortune.

    17. Re:Plain economics by RealAlaskan · · Score: 2
      Even then administring linux is not as simple as windows.

      Too true. With Windows, everything is either compulsory or forbidden. If the boss tells the sysadmin to do something, it is either trivial or impossible. With Linux/*BSD/Solaris/AIX, everything is possible, if only you know how. You can't say ``That's impossible'' without fear of contradiction.

      Everyone knows that Windows crashes periodically, and the sysadmin cannot be responsible for fixing problems: that's done in Redmond or not at all. When things just don't work, the Windows sysadmin can blame it all on MS, and ask for more money, while the Libre *nix sysadmin would have no one to blame but himself, and no excuse for a bigger budget.

      Windows is simple, all right; it has little cartoons to guide you, no embarrasing choices and built-in excuses. Who could ask for less?

    18. Re:Plain economics by WNight · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And they get their training in India, and they sit in India waiting to be hired (basically). That provides a fairly large pool of skilled and semi-skilled workers who will work for local (Indian) wages instead of N.A. wages.

      Those wages might be expensive compared to others in the country, but compared to going overseas for anything they need, it's dirt cheap.

      Besides, Linux is perfect for a university. It's a working system that you can look into and examine. You couldn't become either an automotive engineer or a mechanic without taking cars apart, nor can you become a decent CS grad, or admin, without disecting a few systems and seeing what makes them tick.

    19. Re:Plain economics by Lozzer · · Score: 1

      Everything that claimed it needed a reboot worked fine without it -- except for MS security patches

      I guess the question is whether the MS security patches worked after the reboot, either?

      --
      Special Relativity: The person in the other queue thinks yours is moving faster.
    20. Re:Plain economics by phsolide · · Score: 2, Funny
      Pot, I'd like you to meet kettle, BTW, you're both black.

      Hey I provided references. Mr FUD-Kettle did not. Go read what the references say then get back to us. When you do get back to us let us know what you've found out - post the URLs. Until then buh bye.

      Sincerely
      Blackpot W. References

      --
      Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
    21. Re:Plain economics by skyhawker · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If India has anything in plenty it is people.

      Quite true. In addition, my experience tells me that India also has plenty of smart, educated, highly motivated people as well. I don't think it's going to prove much of a challenge for them to manage a collection of Linux machines.
      --

      The best diplomat I know is a fully activated phaser bank.
      -- Scotty.
    22. Re:Plain economics by Matey-O · · Score: 2

      The only references I'm going to spend the time are from personal experience. Having managed BOTH Microsoft AND Un*ices, they BOTH have their strong and weak points.

      They're both mature enough that they both solve most problems equally well (assuming clueful administration), and NEITHER are without their strengths and ideosyncrasies.

      You can make a fast Mustang and a fast Camaro and only an idiot can't be convinced that's the truth.

      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    23. Re:Plain economics by NerdSlayer · · Score: 2

      Yeah, these announcements are starting to kind of boring and repetative.

      In other news, Bob Smith today bought a new Dell PC preloaded with Windows XP. Chalk one up for the bad guys.

    24. Re:Plain economics by Malor · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've been using Linux a long time, and as far as I know, the statement "linux had journaling filesystems before NT" is absolutely, utterly false. NT 3.51 had journaling.

      Linux didn't have journaling in the mainstream kernel until the ext3 patches were accepted. You could probably have gotten some journaling under Linux with manual patching and installation of beta software in the NT 4.0 timeframe, but I don't believe the mainstream distros offered journaled filesystems until after Windows 2000 shipped.

      Further, NTFS is extremely robust and resilient. It's EXTREMELY unusual to lose data from an NTFS partition. Compare that to reiserfs, which has had many, many, many problems over the years. (I believe it is considered stable now.)

      Admittedly, to some degree, NT *had to* have a great filesystem, because it was unstable. And Linux could get away with the horrid ext2 filesystem because the OS was so reliable that the filesystem was very rarely shut down incorrectly.

      But, regardless, NTFS got journaling and ACL's really *right* long, long ago. Between the two features, it's a lot better than anything Linux offers (yet). Linux is improving rapidly, but filesystems and permissions are core NT strengths and should not be casually dismissed.

    25. Re:Plain economics by zeenixus · · Score: 1

      quote: Linux had journaling filesystems before NT, too uhhh, no. nt has had a journalling filesystem since ntfs. the first journaling fs to be accepted into linus's kernel was reiser. I know when this happened, I was using windows 2000. It was also the primary reason I gave linux a whirl. overall, I'd say that unix systems are more constistant in how they are administrated. (shell scripts and vi can do most of what needs doing.) Windows systems, otoh, require all sorts of specialty tools, with very little consistancy in their interfaces, whether they be graphical or command line. Check out a Windows resource kit if you aren't sure what I mean. And, while on about resource kits, one should also know that they contain shitloads of documentation. All of which (and more) is available on microsoft's site. that said, I'd rather do *nix adminning any day.

      --
      In Bob we trust.
    26. Re:Plain economics by stinkwinkerton · · Score: 1

      No offence, but requiring a reboot of a system to upgrade or install software probably shouldn't be considered a problem of the OS but may be an issue with the software being installed. For example, when installing Tripwire on a large number of win2k systems (with the help of a person from the company) the installation requested a reboot of the system to complete the setup. In reality, all we needed to do was start the service that was installed manually rather than doing it with a reboot. Was this a flaw of the OS? No. A flaw of the app? No. The person who setup the installer figured that the easiest method to get the service up and running in the environment was to restart the system. A human decision. I've installed other apps that install services and they started with no problem, requiring no reboot. Something to consider before considering it a flaw with the OS or the applications residing on it.

      --
      "Look! There! Evil, pure and simple from the Eighth Dimension!" --Buckaroo Banzai
    27. Re:Plain economics by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      We've all encountered Samba, Sendmail, and Kernel panics too.

      In my six years of using Linux as my only desktop OS, I have never encountered a kernel panic. But I'll take you word that there is such a thing.

    28. Re:Plain economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MODS: this is not OFFTOPIC, this is FUNNY.

      get it RIGHT

    29. Re:Plain economics by demon93 · · Score: 1

      I have :-(

      But only due to my own stupidity...a misconfigured lilo.conf (didn't tell it what to boot from, doh!)

      Other than that, I agree, no kernel panics in 6 years.

      --
      demon
      -----
      Nothing is ever a total loss; it can always serve as a bad example.
    30. Re:Plain economics by pellaeon · · Score: 1

      You never had _any_ hardware or driver bugs? You're one lucky person! ;-)

      Seeing your dual athlon nfs server go down with a panic because of a bug in hardware + a vulnerable tg3 driver (gigabit nic, broadcom chipset) is not pretty or fun, I assure you.

      Not that that counts against the kernel itself of course, but it *wasn't fun*...

      --
      -- /bin/coffee missing. universe halted.
    31. Re:Plain economics by Archie+Steel · · Score: 2

      Hmm, I don't know, I have yet to encounter a single Samba, Sendmail or kernel panic yet, after a year and a half since I've switched to Linux at home. I have, however, seen BSOD aplenty, even with Win2K (though these have been less frequent, I must admit - it is the best Windows so far, IMHO).

      --

      Reminder: find a new sig
    32. Re:Plain economics by stor · · Score: 1

      The thing is, you really want admins that are good rather than cheap. I'd suspect that you'd get a lot more value out of a $65K employee who has deep knowledge of computers and can work autonomously than a $35K admin who "knows how to install stuff and click NEXT"

      If it's a full-time employee we're talking about there may be plenty of time for her/him to take the initiative and work on stuff that will make operations run smoother. I've saved companies literally thousands of dollars/month by asking whether I could do a particular thing (eg. bandwidth monitoring) and implementing it. This sort of initative cannot be wholly replaced by software.

      I am so happy about Madhya Pradesh switching to Linux and Digvijay Singh's "spot-on" opinion. This _is_ The Right Thing(tm) for India.

      Third-world countries need to stop accepting handouts from rich countries/companies because these handouts _always_ come with strings attached. Look at the farce that "Foreign Aid" is: rich countries tend to _lend_ poor countries money then expect it back with a truckload of interest, making them poorer.

      There are a few examples of companies screwing over people in third-world countries. Nestle (bottled milk), Nike, diamond cartels... do you think MS would be any different, with *their* track record?

      People really need to stop being a penny wise and a pound foolish.

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
    33. Re:Plain economics by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      I had Mozilla go nuts just yesterday and grab 98% of resources before I killed it. Of course, it was running on a seperate machine (running NetBSD/i386) than this Sparc that I use as my main terminal (dual headed SparcStation 10BSXes rock!), so I was able to telnet over to the offending machine and manually kill the process, even with Mozilla sucking up 98% of the CPU (according to top).

      The incidence of the OS itself going unstable is so rare, though, as to be a red letter event. I had a linux machine pop off and quit just once back when I ran Linux.

      I like NetBSD and Solaris a lot more, though. The more I learn about Unix, the less I'm really very interested in the wad of code people lump around a Linux kernal and call a 'distribution.'

    34. Re:Plain economics by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      You never had _any_ hardware or driver bugs? You're one lucky person! ;-)

      I've had hardware and driver problems, but no kernel panics.

    35. Re:Plain economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm do you follow security at all? The most financially significant threat to corporations is internally, be that staff or intruders. This implies ACLs etc are very important.

      You then proceed to talk about protection from remote attacks, which is specifically a SERVER issue (corporate networks). The story in question implies (doesn't specifically say) that the switch is on desktop machines, NOT servers.
      In which case firewalling doesnt matter a dam thing. The ability to lock down the OS so users cant mess it up, ease of use, training required, etc are the issues that matter.

      I'd also suggest that your final estimate hasn't taken into account group policy, and excelent mass deployment/package installtion services such as Altiris.

    36. Re:Plain economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your are right. I used to manage about 45+ business critical Linux servers single handed (Security, Hardware, Networking, Backups, Updates, helping users, the whole works). Now I am managing W2K+IIS (two of us, another MCSE), we are struggling to keep 15 boxes up!

    37. Re:Plain economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with most of your post, but I'll bite on semantics because I have some links to dump...

      "While various linux filesystems support ACLs, no one is using them yet."

      Nobody? Then how come Samba has had support for them in the server (with kernel support) and the client since version 2.2.0?

      For filemanagers, what is it that exporer.exe can do that nautilus or konqueror can't? I mean except freeze up when you unplug the network cable... I'm puzzled.

    38. Re:Plain economics by jelle · · Score: 2

      "Further, NTFS is extremely robust and resilient."

      In my experience not in the speed sense. Actually, not on any front when compared with ext3. Even when compares with ext2, NTFS is a dog. Where do you get the idea that ext2 is 'horrid'? You must be confusing with last year's reiserfs versions. The only disadvantage of ext2 was the long fsck on large partitions, which was fixed with journaling. The other disadvantage, slowness with many (>5000) files in one subdirectory is worse with NTFS, and will be fixed (may already be fixed) in one of the upcoming kernel releases anyway.

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    39. Re:Plain economics by clare-ents · · Score: 2

      I've had two.

      Once hard disk cable had fallen out, in the other my video card had melted and never worked again.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. (Einstein)
    40. Re:Plain economics by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      Further, NTFS is extremely robust and resilient. It's EXTREMELY unusual to lose data from an NTFS partition. Compare that to reiserfs, which has had many, many, many problems over the years. (I believe it is considered stable now.)

      True that linux didn't have a journaling fs in stable before NT had journaling but it's my understanding that NTFS wasn't really journaling until 5, the NTFS used for Win2k and XP. I have lost several files from NT3.51 and 4.0 systems, so if the OS *Does* have journaling that far back, it's buggy as hell which doesn't help. A lamborghini can't hit 200 mph if it falls apart before it gets there.

      You're right that NT got ACLs right in antiquity, which is the primary thing they did right from the beginning. When I think of what the secondary was I'll let you know.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    41. Re:Plain economics by nathanm · · Score: 2
      We've all encountered Samba, Sendmail, and Kernel panics too.
      That's a very bold statement. I've never encountered these in 7 years of running Linux. Other people I know have had kernel panics, but they're the ones who run bleeding-edge development kernels.

      OTOH, almost every Windows box I've ever used has crashed at some point, some quite often. Windows NT was quite stable, before version 4, when they moved the GUI into kernel space.
    42. Re:Plain economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't suggest ACL's in Windows are easier to use than in Unix? Ha ha, even OS/2 has more consistently designed Access Permissions. In linux on OS/2 you know on glance how permissions will affect the user belonging to different groups. In windows? The fact that permissions are intact when files are moved within the volume was never fixed and causes ton's of problems. Permissions at both share level and so called security at the file level interact in the way that is always against the administrator causing him to create new groups just to satisfying these dependencies. Local and global groups? Pathetic... In linux and OS/2 (I don't know Netware) you know how permissions work for particular user by glancing at ACL.

    43. Re:Plain economics by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      The only disadvantage of ext2 was the long fsck on large partitions, which was fixed with journaling. The other disadvantage, slowness with many (>5000) files in one subdirectory is worse with NTFS, and will be fixed (may already be fixed) in one of the upcoming kernel releases anyway.

      You mean, the lack of journaling was fixed with ext3.

      Anyway I wouldn't be pushing ext3 personally (though it is what I used on my firewall for simplicity - I will regret this perhaps when 2.6 comes out with XFS in the main kernel tree) so much as XFS. XFS seems to be the most scalable and capable of the current implementations. ReiserFS has its uses (in that you can treat it like a database) but I still think that the high rate of failures we all saw in it through the last year and change indicate that it's not architected as well as it ought to be. Then again, I'm no programmer, and I haven't been rooting around in the source, so maybe there's some other explanation.

      NTFS5 has treated me very well. NTFS4 (pre-journaling) did not. I don't store 5,000 files in one directory typically (except maybe for http cache) as I know what hierarchical file systems are for, so I don't have a problem churning through lots of files in one dir. Remember, a filesystem is a database, you have a limited set of tools for manipulating data directly, and there are certain ways you have to treat the data in order to get good performance.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    44. Re:Plain economics by Malor · · Score: 1

      It sounds like your primary worry is speed. I won't argue about ext2 being fast; it is very fast for most uses, and I have no complaints about it on that front.

      But I meant 'you don't lose data on NTFS very often' when I said 'robust and resilient'. Usually, I don't need speed as much as being SURE the data will be there when I go back to get it. Under ext2, that's just not the case.... a power failure can result in a huge amount of damage to the filesystem. It can usually be recovered with expertise and time, but a *good* fileystem, IMO, wouldn't have that problem.

      From other posts in this thread, I may have been incorrect about NTFS4 being journaled. I thought it was. NT 4.0's filesystem was a LOT more robust than ext2, but I suppose that might not require journaling. I know that all versions of NTFS were designed to maintain the filesystem in a consistent state... you might lose data in open files, but you would almost certainly not lose the whole filesystem. (I thought that was marketroid for 'journaling', but may have been wrong.)

      From a system administration perspective, that's what I want.... losing the whole server is Not Good. :-) NTFS5 may be better, but NTFS4 was excellent, in my experience. I think Linux is only just now getting there, and I'm still not entirely convinced.

    45. Re:Plain economics by jelle · · Score: 2

      I've lost more data on a live ntfs system than I've ever lost on a powerfailure with an active ext2... Sure the e2fsck often printed lots of messages, but that was just for the large amount of metadata that remained in the cache when the brute poweroff happened, and was usually fixed without losing data except some recent log entries and other such growing or open files. Added to that the journal of ext3 not virtually guarantees no data loss (and eliminates the extreme fsck wait).

      While ntfs needs to be more resilient agains crashes for obvious reasons, even in the crash resiliency respect I've never been mistreated by ext2. It's not a cleanly designed filesystem, it's a stack of features upon a hack. ntfs is just a hack on top of vfat, which is a hack on top of fat. Reminds me of Duck Tape Repairs(tm). It's always in the consistent state of of disarray (In this IBM factory, they luckily found that out ahead of time, with windows machines thrashing and needing defragmentations or reinstalls while Linux just chugged along (I think there was a /. story about this fab, but couldn't find it)). The fact that ntfs doesn't have or use the 'filesystem dirty' state isn't something to be proud of, it results in filesystem errors that remain undetected until the whole thing falls apart. On windows, it's wise to force a full fsck after a crash even if the box seems to be back up.

      From a system administration perspective, I want a filesystem that keeps its data and stays fast under any load. About losing a whole server, or a random part of it. Actually, I'd rather lose the whole server and switch to the backup while restoring the tapes than get it started back up and thinking I kept all the data, only to realize that I'm missing part two weeks later just after the backups got overwritten...

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    46. Re:Plain economics by Malor · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you're getting this crap, but you're just flat wrong.

      You can test the ext2 thing yourself. Here's an example that's almost certain to leave you with filesystem damage. Install postfix, set up a dedicated /var/spool/postfix ext2 partition, start loading it with a thousand or so small, non-deliverable messages (so they stay there awhile, postfix is really fast), and pull the plug about halfway through. You'll get fairly severe damage almost every time, to the point that the machine won't reboot without manual intervention. Probably 90% chance.

      Another example was when I first installed Linux in a professional environment. It ran DNS for us very nicely for a year or so, and then the power supply failed. The damage to the filesystem was EXTENSIVE. It took me a lot of work to fix it, almost to the point that it might have been faster to just rebuild it. It had several hundred crosslinked files, and I had to essentially take manual notes and copy damaged system files back in from the secondary machine. At that point I didn't know about RPM auditing; I suspect that would have made my life a lot easier. (although I don't know if RPM did that back then, either.) Regardless, it took me a long time to fix the machine, and my boss was Not Happy.... Linux was a hard sell there and if DNS had run reasonably well on Microsoft boxes at the time, that would probably have been the end of the experiment.

      Keep in mind that we had a couple of hundred NT (4.0) machines at that same shop, and in the three years I was there, we never lost a byte of data. We had to reboot the goddamn things constantly, but we NEVER got filesystem corruption or lost data. Ever. I had a couple of hard drive failures, and I was still able to pull most of the data off dying drives; the drive itself had damaged the filesystem, but after cooling off, a chkdsk was able to restore things well enough for me to pull the data off. Ext2 loses data just from a power failure: NTFS does pretty well with a malfunctioning drive. There just is NOT a comparison here.

      Your linked article says that NT choked and died after a week of heavy use, which I won't dispute, as it sounds easily possible. However, your article doesn't say ANYTHING about the filesystem. It does not support your argument. Nothing I have seen DOES support your argument. The filesystem is probably NT's strongest point. If there were problems with it, the newgroups would be filled with screaming anguish, and you can be sure that Slashdot would run many articles on unreliable NTFS..... but in the real world, that doesn't happen. You just don't see many complaints on that front. Everything ELSE, yes, but not the filesystem.

      Then you say 'from a system administration perspective, I want a filesystem that keeps its data and stays fast under any load'.

      Well yeah, I'd like that too! A server I could hang millions of clients from.... ANY load. Woohoo.

      Um, no, I don't want to buy a bridge too, sorry.

    47. Re:Plain economics by jelle · · Score: 2

      Crap? Wrong? Its my experience, that's all. If you read back my posting then you'll see that I'm telling you _my_ experience with ext2 and ntfs, not yours. Perhaps I've been unlucky with ntfs and lucky with ext2, or perhaps it's the other way around for you.

      AFAIK, the 'journaling' in NTFS isn't ordered journaling. It keeps a metadata file which get a log of the file actions to allow rollback. But, acording to this page, that file gets written to only once every few seconds. So when you crash, the log may be a few seconds old, so you may end up after reboot with an apparently 'clean' filesystem but some files will be old, missing their latest modifications. ext3 has a mode like that too, 'writeback', but also has the 'journal' and 'ordered' modes that don't have that problem.

      The choking of NT for the fab was a result of fragmentation in the filesystem... Another article about the same fab mentioned that (sorry, have no link, but others are reporting it too). That's not what I what I call reliable and robust: Eventually it will fragment too much to perform, resulting in more downtime. It doesn't stay as fast as it was when I built and benchmarked the system... Plus things in the past like this and this don't help at all on the confidence front.

      I had many hardware failures on active loaded linux boxes, failing power supplies, mainboards, etc, never lost data as the result (except when a disk completely died without raid, and the disk wouldn't spinup...). The boxes just keep going until the hardware dies. That's what I call reliability and robustness.

      About the 'stays fast under any load', I mean cases like the 100% CPU load on fragmented ntfs volumes, as reported here, which cause the system to be unresponsive, resulting in network timeouts... Or things like this, where the given workaround basically means you can't have a lot of small files on your disk...

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
  2. Bill.. by Libor+Vanek · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'd like to see Bill's face in that moment ;-)

    1. Re: Bill.. by grub · · Score: 1


      I'd like to see Bill's face in that moment ;-)

      Here you go :)

      --
      Trolling is a art,
  3. yeah yeah yeah by chef_raekwon · · Score: 4, Funny

    someone has balls!
    someone has balls!!

    india 1
    gates 0

    --
    We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
    1. Re:yeah yeah yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhh, I think that Microsoft's wealth is about the same as the GDP of India, if not more.

    2. Re:yeah yeah yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And how is that relevant? I guess they can invade and institute martial OS now?

    3. Re:yeah yeah yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, actually, this remains to be seen. Could be:

      India: 1
      Gates: (Number of Indian States) - 1

      There's the REST of India to consider.

    4. Re:yeah yeah yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't it be:
      India 1
      Gates $billions

    5. Re:yeah yeah yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chief Minister Digvijay Singh is my hero!

    6. Re:yeah yeah yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they said it all when they unveiled the 8 foot condom upon Gates arrival in India.

    7. Re:yeah yeah yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to nominate the parent comment for the Stupidest +5 Comment Ever award.

      (No offense meant to you, Mr. Raekwon. In fact, congratulations!)

  4. At least it wasn't Sun.. by buzzsport · · Score: 5, Funny

    If it was McNealy would have a new tag-line:

    We're the dot in.. ah.. nevermind.

    1. Re:At least it wasn't Sun.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      > We're the dot in.. ah.. nevermind.

      That may soon be:

      We're the dot in Chapter.Eleven

    2. Re:At least it wasn't Sun.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i must say, i almost spit the coffee all over the lcd screen when i saw this one..hehehe

    3. Re:At least it wasn't Sun.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, sir, are a racist. I find your comment disgusting and offensive. Please burn in hell.

    4. Re:At least it wasn't Sun.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      48. It is well known that crowding increases stress and aggression. The degree of crowding that exists today and the isolation of man from nature are consequences of technological progress. All pre-industrial societies were predominantly rural. The industrial Revolution vastly increased the size of cities and the proportion of the population that lives in them, and modern agricultural technology has made it possible for the Earth to support a far denser population than it ever did before. (Also, technology exacerbates the effects of crowding because it puts increased disruptive powers in people's hands. For example, a variety of noise-making devices: power mowers, radios, motorcycles, etc. If the use of these devices is unrestricted, people who want peace and quiet are frustrated by the noise. If their use is restricted, people who use the devices are frustrated by the regulations... But if these machines had never been invented there would have been no conflict and no frustration generated by them.)

      49. For primitive societies the natural world (which usually changes only slowly) provided a stable framework and therefore a sense of security. In the modern world it is human society that dominates nature rather than the other way around, and modern society changes very rapidly owing to technological change. Thus there is no stable framework.

      50. The conservatives are fools: They whine about the decay of traditional values, yet they enthusiastically support technological progress and economic growth. Apparently it never occurs to them that you can't make rapid, drastic changes in the technology and the economy of a society with out causing rapid changes in all other aspects of the society as well, and that such rapid changes inevitably break down traditional values.

      51.The breakdown of traditional values to some extent implies the breakdown of the bonds that hold together traditional small-scale social groups. The disintegration of small-scale social groups is also promoted by the fact that modern conditions often require or tempt individuals to move to new locations, separating themselves from their communities. Beyond that, a technological society HAS TO weaken family ties and local communities if it is to function efficiently. In modern society an individual's loyalty must be first to the system and only secondarily to a small-scale community, because if the internal loyalties of small-scale small-scale communities were stronger than loyalty to the system, such communities would pursue their own advantage at the expense of the system.

      52. Suppose that a public official or a corporation executive appoints his cousin, his friend or his co-religionist to a position rather than appointing the person best qualified for the job. He has permitted personal loyalty to supersede his loyalty to the system, and that is "nepotism" or "discrimination," both of which are terrible sins in modern society. Would-be industrial societies that have done a poor job of subordinating personal or local loyalties to loyalty to the system are usually very inefficient. (Look at Latin America.) Thus an advanced industrial society can tolerate only those small-scale communities that are emasculated, tamed and made into tools of the system.

    5. Re:At least it wasn't Sun.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, which part of the truth are we not allowed to observe and repeat?!

  5. All I've Got to Say to Bill Gates Is: by hkhanna · · Score: 2, Funny

    owned. ;)

    --

    Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
  6. Hmmm... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess that was the last Bill Gates contribution to AIDS in India...

    1. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ack! Bill has been spreading AIDS too? He's even more evil than we thought!

    2. Re:Hmmm... by invenustus · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, but you could blame Bill Gates for some of the other virus outbreaks of the last 3 years. Nimda, Code Red, Sircam....

      --
      grep -ri 'should work' /usr/src/linux | wc -l
    3. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://abcnews.go.com/wire/SciTech/reuters20021114 _139.html

      has the story... I haven't seen a picture or video of it yet. I'd love to see the look on his face :)

    4. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whit all the money they safe,
      the Indian state will be able
      to found them self any thing.

    5. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, we know what they want to spend money on... big nuclear weapons

    6. Re:Hmmm... by foobario · · Score: 1

      Funny you should mention this. I recently returned from six months in India, where I found that 'rural cybercafes catering to the everyday needs of the masses' is just a euphemism for 'surfing for pr0n'.
      I can't tell you how many times I've sat in a queue waiting for a computer to open up while, in full view of everyone else in the room, young guys surfed photos of improbably gymnastic and well-proportioned women. I asked one of my Indian workmates about it, and he said that internet porn was Bill Gates' gift to India.
      Forget the OS wars; I'll be happy when the Indian government provides 'first-pull-up-then-pull-down' disposable keyboard and mouse covers to protect users from cooties.

  7. Indians rule!!! by riven1128 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    EOM

  8. Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinXP by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 1, Troll

    WINE doesn't run CS, Starcraft, UT, and all the other online games that make third-world cyber cafes profitable.

    Though some of the official stuff, as well as the more family-oriented shops may change to Linux, the vast majority of cyber cafes will still be running pirated games under a pirated Windows.

    India will continue to pirate as long as Microsoft leads everywhere else, though having the governor officially reject capitalism is a good step for socialism.

  9. Horray! by dethl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One less country in the clutches of the evil M$ corporation! Viva la resitance!

    Do you think M$ will get the obvious message being sent out from this situation...probably, but then again, they'll just take over another small 3rd world country.

    --
    "Some fight for law. Some fight for justice. What will you fight for? One day, you will see."
  10. Really? by joib · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Makes one wonder if they really are planning to switch, or if it's yet another scheme to extort free MS-licences from Billy-boy..

    1. Re:Really? by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1

      I think it's pretty clear cut, Gates wanted in they said get @##$$%%^&^&*, very wise of them, I would use silly billies stuff if he offered to pay me to do so.

      --
      in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
      Francis Smit
    2. Re:Really? by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, they stuck their hands out and ordereed "PAY US TO USE WINDOWS", Gates said no.

      Indian government runs on bribes and extortion. Any of you /.'ers who want to compare it favorably to america, need to go live there for a few years.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:Really? by Anarchofascist · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "...wonder if they really are planning to switch, or if it's yet another scheme to extort free MS-licences..."

      Either way, It's good news, except of course for Microsoft shareholders.

      --
      Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more, Or close the wall up with our American dead!
    4. Re:Really? by Darby · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Indian government runs on bribes and extortion.

      Which is different from the US government exactly how?

    5. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      clairvoyance , telepaty, mind control , crystall gazing

      which is your voccation ??

    6. Re:Really? by oolon · · Score: 2

      Not really, the will right of the costs of giving the software away against tax and the full list price rather than at the cost of production for MS. So if you consider the fact that they would not have bought a licence if they had not been given a copy, MS is infact making a profit.

      James

    7. Re:Really? by marauder404 · · Score: 2
      Either way, It's good news, except of course for Microsoft shareholders.
      Not true at all. I'm not a Linux zealot, but I will say this: if Microsoft gives its software to them for free, they will gain marketshare and will have lost nothing. The long term advantages of increasing an installed base and requiring more techies trained on Microsoft platforms especially in a developing country will do far more damage than losing any potential short term income if cash flow isn't a problem.
    8. Re:Really? by ksatcu · · Score: 1

      This post was mod'ed Insightful!! :)

    9. Re:Really? by Shelled · · Score: 2

      That has to be the oddest use of the word 'extort' I've seen, like saying that cooking my own meals is extorting from McDonalds.

    10. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least India has a president who is a billion times smarter than US president, and you know who ?

    11. Re:Really? by Anarchofascist · · Score: 2

      So if you consider the fact that they would not have bought a licence if they had not been given a copy, MS is infact making a profit.

      By that logic they might as well give away fifty-CD collections of Microsoft's Greatest Hits because the production costs are almost zero. It's not worth my while correcting your understanding of economics.. I'll leave that as an exercise for the reader

      The precedent is what's important, not the cost of licenses in one province in India. From now on, if you want to drive down the price of MS software you just have to confront them with "we were thinking of converting all fifty thousand desktops to Linux." Even if it's not true.

      In negotiation with vendors, competition is always good for the consumer, even if you are not really considering the competing product. Just say "mass-migration" and the MS salesman's heart will skip a beat. Remember to have a defibrillator on hand.

      --
      Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more, Or close the wall up with our American dead!
    12. Re:Really? by Anarchofascist · · Score: 2

      ...if Microsoft gives its software to them for free, they will gain marketshare and will have lost nothing.

      I'm a developer, why don't they give me a complete set of development tools and documentation for free? Because tools cost money to develop, money they knew they could recoup by selling them to me, and to India. A tool given to a developer who would otherwise have paid for it is a loss for MS shareholders.

      Without the threat of migration, MS would have told India "here's the price, take it or leave it."

      In the global picture, with increasing competition from Linux, both Linux and MS developers win. Only MS (the company, not the community) loses. I can't see a downside.

      --
      Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more, Or close the wall up with our American dead!
    13. Re:Really? by marauder404 · · Score: 2

      True, but that wasn't the original point. The original point was that it's a loss for Microsoft if they had to give away the tools (in this case) for free. All I was saying was that even if they gave away the tools for free, they'd win anyway.

  11. Budget issues? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe their budget wasn't big enough to cover
    the costs of buying and administering Windows
    systems.

    If Bill Gates wants to dominate the universe,
    he needs to do something about this issue- perhaps
    he could get the US government to pay a subsidy
    for Micro$oft products in poor countries- on the
    grounds that it is not made by communists from
    Finland.

    1. Re:Budget issues? by nickclarke · · Score: 0

      All he needs to do is suggest that terrorists are using linux... Of course, if we could persuade GWB that the terrorists are using windows to plan their attacks...

  12. Shall we see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot.org ./'ed from its own readers reaching for the "Reply" button to express their joy ?

    [begin random comment list]
    Sweet!
    Up yours, Bill !
    Someone had balls finally !
    Score one for India !
    [etc...]

  13. Maybe it's like poker .. by riven1128 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Gates: We'll see your refusal to switch and raise you a contribution to

    1. Re:Maybe it's like poker .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like...

      Gate: Hmm. That's another 4 Windows sales down the drain.

    2. Re:Maybe it's like poker .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A contribution to what?

    3. Re:Maybe it's like poker .. by riven1128 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oops..

      Slashdot cut out part of the post thinking it was an html tag ..

      it should have read "a contribution to .. [insert name of horrible disease here]"

  14. I must be missing something by iamwoodyjones · · Score: 3, Funny

    Where in the article did it say he conveyed this personaly to Bill Gates. All I saw was that he conveyed it to ET.

    I thought I was going to see a quote around the lines of, "Madhya walked up to Bill, spat in his face and said, 'Take that Billy Boy. You monopolistic capitlistic pig. I'm going to use something free as in getting really drunk'"

    Alas I'm missing something here.

  15. question by Guipo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    at what point, does other OS's have sufficient market share, and then Microsoft wont be concidered a monopoly? Guipo

    --
    Theonlyuse of monkeys is to testthings onthem.Some peoplemay say"Hey That'scruel!"and myresponse is"I don't like monkeys
    1. Re:question by grub · · Score: 3, Funny


      at what point, does other OS's have sufficient market share, and then Microsoft wont be concidered a monopoly?

      Normal Answer: When Microsoft is no longer the dominant player in both the OS and applications markets and they stop using their muscle to put small companies out of business.

      Slashdot Answer: When Bill Gates is drawn and quartered in a town square in Finland and Redmond is a deep, smouldering crater.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a very easy question to answer. When I can go to Wally World and buy any piece of software straight off the shelf without being FORCED to use Winblows in order to run it. There you have it, simple question, simple answer. :)

    3. Re:question by JimmytheGeek · · Score: 3, Funny

      Been to redmond lately? It already IS a deep, smoldering crater. Another Bellevue, alas. It used to be something more than a mall and the belly of the beast.

    4. Re:question by rseuhs · · Score: 2

      As soon as all major PC-makers offer non-MS options on all their computers.

    5. Re:question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > As soon as all major PC-makers offer non-MS options on all their computers.

      That's funny. Only option is Linux which does not support most of hardware. Personally I don't believe that will benefit customers, myself included.

      Thanks but no.

    6. Re:question by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware that any major PC-maker wasn't offering a bios menu to fuck around in, for the inverterate Micro$oft hater to remain mired in, refusing to boot further into 'that dastardly thing!'

    7. Re:question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the Bush Administration declares a monopoly have 101% of the market share.

  16. Yeah ok... by pranalukas · · Score: 4, Funny

    But will this eliminate Microsoft ads on Slashdot?

    1. Re:Yeah ok... by myLobster · · Score: 1

      But will this eliminate Microsoft ads on Slashdot?

      No way. Gotta keep giving M$ those clickthroughs. Damned if I'm buying anything, but at least /. gets some revenue.

      --

      Ceci n'est pas une .sig
    2. Re:Yeah ok... by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      Money talks...bullshit walks.

      OSDN needs advertising money. MS has it.

      Don't forget that a recent poll showed that 50% of /.ers run an MS OS (myself included). They really do have a target audience here.

      -B

    3. Re:Yeah ok... by zapfie · · Score: 1

      You make it sound like MS is buying advertising from OSDN. MS is buying advertising from Doubleclick. Doubleclick provides banner ads to Slashdot, among thousands of other websites.

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
    4. Re:Yeah ok... by WNight · · Score: 2

      Those numbers show me firmly in the Windows camp, IE6 on XP. But I run Mozilla on Linux.

      I don't doubt there are a lot of Windows users here, but keep in mind that nobody spoofs using Mozilla on Linux, but many people spoof the other way, thanks to web designers without clues.

      I'd be somewhat sceptical of those numbers.

  17. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by miffo.swe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "India will continue to pirate as long as Microsoft leads everywhere else, though having the governor officially reject capitalism is a good step for socialism."

    He did NOT reject capitalism, it was the freedom he didnt want to give up. Thats a very big difference.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  18. Re:Michael, they prefer to be called Native Americ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still waiting for the "-1, Dumbass" moderation to be implemented...
    It's India, smuck.

  19. Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    MP opens windows to Linux
    ANIL SHARMA

    TIMES NEWS NETWORK [ TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2002 01:42:20 AM ]
    BHOPAL: Madhya Pradesh has shut the door on Bill Gates. The state government schemes will use Linux software. Chief minister Digvijay Singh personally conveyed this to Microsoft boss Bill Gates during an interaction last week in New Delhi.

    "For us it is not a question of Microsoft versus Linux. It is just a matter of choosing between a free software and a monopoly. We feel that when we are putting public information out in the open, then it should not be through a proprietary software," Mr Singh told ET.

    Nor is it merely a public vs private ideological battle. Germany and Latin American countries, particularly Peru and Brazil, have opted for Linux rather than proprietary software to bring down costs, which keep mounting with successive upgrades in the case of proprietary software.

    Madhya Pradesh has two significant programmes that reach out to people in a big way: Gyandoot e-governance, which covers 26 out of 45 districts and won the Stockholm Challenge Award for 2000, and the Headstart programme for computer-enabled school education. For the Headstart programme, the state government is now committed to use Linux.

    Microsoft chairman Bill Gates has shown an interest in Gyandoot.

    According R Gopalakrishnan, state coordinator for the Rajiv Gandhi missions, the first phase of the Headstart did use Microsoft software, but the next will use Linux.

    "This should set at rest any fears that we are anti-Microsoft as such. But we have opted for Linux in this phase, because of the cost factor, and the fact that it avoids costly upgrades and improved versions that are an inseparable element of Microsoft packages," he said.

    "It is a considered decision taken by us. We have noted that several governments in the west and other countries too have opted for the Linux software instead of Microsoft because of a host of considerations," Mr Singh said.

    1. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is really interesting to me is that India (by all accounts a "developing nation") has such a robust push for technology education.

      Most schools in the US are lucky if they have a few old PCs lying around, let alone a government sponsored program to teach kids how to use Linux.

      I think that the US is going to be having it's lunch eaten by the subcontinent in IT really, really soon.

      That's probably why Bill is suddenly so interested in India as well. Although AIDS is a major problem, MS's hold on IT must also be concerning him.

    2. Re:Mirror by silverbolt · · Score: 1

      For those who don't know, Gyandoot means Messenger of Knowledge. Gyan=knowledge, doot=messenger.

  20. Get some perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These decisions should be made based on cost and on what best serves the people, not on ideological issues like commercial vs. free software.

    Unless it's really an issue of morality (which I think is a huge stretch in this case).

  21. It reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of one of Apu's lines on an episode of The Simpsons. I believe it was one of the many episodes in which society crumbles, leading to widespread lawless behavior... Anyway, Apu is sitting on the roof of the Quickie Mart with a shotgun. As a looter leaves the store, Apu shouts, "Thank you for coming! I'll see you in hell!"

  22. Wait a Minute! by 4of12 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dammit, who let a man of principle become highly placed in government?

    This would never have happened back here in the good ole U.S. of A!

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:Wait a Minute! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Dammit, who let a man of principle become highly placed in government?
      >
      > This would never have happened back here in the good ole U.S. of A!

      Not true. With election campaigns the way they are, you have to be a man with principal (say $500K) to stand a chance of getting elected.

    2. Re:Wait a Minute! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      500k is chump change in a federal level election. 250 of the winners for Congress this month outspent their opponent 10 to 1.

    3. Re:Wait a Minute! by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      OH please.

      Move to India. Leave this country.

      Become one of the "untouchables".

      See what it's like to live in a country, where because of an accident of birth, you literally aren't *allowed* to do anything but scrub public urinals for the rest of your life, get any sort of education, or look the higher castes in the eyes. See if your lofty anti-american criticisms remain when you have to remove your shoes and bow your head just to walk past one of your 'betters', and you're denied medical treatment because the social order views you as beneath contempt.

      Gandhi didn't change shit. That still goes on day to day, I've seen it firsthand. That country disgusted me at just how insensitive humans can be to their own kind. Cows are worshipped, people left in the street to die.

      AND, India has one of the most corrupt governments around. Kickbacks? Bribes? Abuse of authority? Conflicts of interest? Our local politicians could learn a *LOT* from the Indians.

      I really find it hard to believe there was anything altruistic about using linux, and more of an answer to MSFT's announcing it would be cracking down harder on piracy in the region, and if Gates paid the customary round bribes, you'd see Windows XP on every one of those PCs.

      I read the story as Gates' having the convictions to refuse to do business that way.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:Wait a Minute! by Usquebaugh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Principle , priciple he says...

      The only reason you think he has principles is that he agrees with your beliefs. Looks like the school boy moderators agree with you.

      Principled indeed. He's a politician, do you have any idea what that job involves? It has very little to do with working for the benefit of the electorate.

    5. Re:Wait a Minute! by donutello · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Gandhi didn't change shit. That still goes on day to day, I've seen it firsthand. That country disgusted me at just how insensitive humans can be to their own kind. Cows are worshipped, people left in the street to die.


      You are a bloody moron - or a liar - I can't figure out which.

      Untouchability is not practiced in India anymore - and hasn't been so for the last 30 years at least. I went to schools with friends who belonged to all castes and the persons caste never came up for discussion except in the context of India's ridiculous affirmative action laws.

      Cows are NOT worshipped in India. Cows are respected like a mother because they provide milk, plow the fields and provide fuel and fertilizer - thus taking care of their "children". Trust a typical westerner to confuse respect with worship - especially since the concept of repecting ones elders doesn't exist in the US.

      Westerners trying to apply their narrow world views to different cultures will always fail to understand them.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    6. Re:Wait a Minute! by donutello · · Score: 2

      Don't confuse someone who merely agrees with you as being someone who has principles.

      Digvijay Singh has been at the center of several scandals. For example.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    7. Re:Wait a Minute! by SquadBoy · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm sure these people will be glad to know that untouchability is not practiced. And I'm sure that all of these stories are just made up.

      And of course CNN is well known for making things up. And I'm sure this
      guy is just making stuff up also. And last but not least this

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    8. Re:Wait a Minute! by Quixote · · Score: 2

      Of course, since you don't agree with him, you must be without principles.

    9. Re:Wait a Minute! by sonamchauhan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Cows are worshipped, people left to die...
      > one of the most corrupt governments ...
      > Kickbacks? Bribes? Abuse of authority? ...
      True, this goes on. And there is more corruption there than, say, the US. But there are _tons_ of people who try to do right, and...

      > Become one of the "untouchables"...
      > because of an accident of birth,
      > you literally aren't *allowed* to do
      > anything but scrub public urinals for the rest
      > of your life, get any sort of education, or
      > look the higher castes in the eyes.
      An Indian _President_ - the previous one - was one such "untouchable".

      Did you really spend time in India? Was it in transit?

      > how insensitive humans can be to their
      > own kind.
      We'd respect what you said more, if you actually do something to help.

      > if Gates paid the customary round bribes,
      > you'd see Windows XP on every one of those PCs.

      I guess you mean Licensed copies, no? I don't quite think India can afford that.

      [ From another post of yours ]
      > No, they stuck their hands out and ordereed
      > "PAY US TO USE WINDOWS", Gates said no.

      Gee, you are one investigative Troll!

    10. Re:Wait a Minute! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't been there recently, I see. Please speak when you have a clue as to what you're talking about.

    11. Re:Wait a Minute! by pubjames · · Score: 5, Interesting

      See what it's like to live in a country, where because of an accident of birth, you literally aren't *allowed* to do anything but scrub public urinals for the rest of your life

      As opposed to living in a country, where because of an accident of birth, you can become President even if you are a dunce!

    12. Re:Wait a Minute! by 4of12 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The only reason you think he has principles is that he agrees with your beliefs.

      You're right - my knee-jerk reaction.

      Forgive me, I'm just so conditioned to think that any politician that doesn't automatically climb into bed with money is somehow better and different from most.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    13. Re:Wait a Minute! by dsmorey · · Score: 1

      As opposed to living in a country, where because of an accident of birth, you can become President even if you are a dunce!

      Very true, I'm amazed that Bill actually got elected to 2 terms.

    14. Re:Wait a Minute! by Tom · · Score: 2

      Move to India. Leave this country.

      You may not realize it, but the "like it or leave it" bullshit is not a "witty aphorism", it's a tool to sentence critics. It takes more courage to stay and fight an abusive regime than to pack up and go elsewhere. And without people who have the guts to stay and do something about whatever it is that's wrong, we'd probably all be living in caves still.

      So if you don't like people speaking their mind, then leave. ;-)

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    15. Re:Wait a Minute! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Trust a typical westerner...."

      Yep, you sure don't have a narrow world view.

    16. Re:Wait a Minute! by sqlgeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From your comment that caste no longer matters in India we can only conclude that you are from a mid-to-upper caste. Correct me if I've errored in this assumption.

    17. Re:Wait a Minute! by buzzcutbuddha · · Score: 1

      You mean, as opposed to Dubya who wasn't actually elected but appointed to the presidency?

    18. Re:Wait a Minute! by thedigitalbean · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I feel compelled to point out a few things.

      First, outside of strict mathematical definitions, the statement "Untouchability is not practiced in India anymore" does not necessarily imply that there are absolutely no cases of untouchability practised. It would be tantamount to pointing to news stories within the US involving hate crimes and claiming that the assertion that the US does not support hate crimes is false. Even several counter examples are not sufficient to render the original claim false. When you have a billion people, it is inevitable that some will do stupid things, however that DOES NOT reflect the attitude of the population as a whole. What does reflect the attitudes of the population are the laws upheld by the society, laws which clearly state that any discrimination based on caste are illegal.

      Now for your second paragraph. Yes CNN is in fact known for making things up and exagerrating facts, but that is beside the issue.

      Lets look at the story you point to:

      It is the author that claims that hindus worship cows even though the article has the following quote "Cow in this country is like a mother" which I believe was the original poster's claim.

      As for your google links I find it interesting that several of those particular links are sites which try not to present facts but try to convince you of the moral superiority of another religions belief. Come on now, do you honestly expect the site muslimonline.com to present a fair and unopinionated view of any aspect of hinduism?

    19. Re:Wait a Minute! by zulux · · Score: 2

      Trust a typical westerner to confuse respect with worship - especially since the concept of repecting ones elders doesn't exist in the US.


      Trust a typical American-basher to confuse the views of an individual with an entire country. Ther're plenty of Americans with all sorts of viwepoints - and, from personal experience, most of them respect their elders.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    20. Re:Wait a Minute! by jaoswald · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh, please. You seriously believe George W. Bush would be president today if his father weren't George H. W. Bush, or GHWB would have been president if *his* father had not been Prescott Bush?

      W.'s whole "business" experience (i.e., demonstrating his ability to lose other people's money) was based on political connections to his father's associates.

      As for dunce, I suppose you think that getting gentlemen's C's at Yale after a comfortable life as a Bush in Connecticut is demonstrating more intelligence than being granted a Rhodes scholarship after growing up in the middle-of-nowhere-Arkansas. Given that GWB can't seem to utter more than two sentences in a row without either garbled syntax or a manifest absurdity, I find your judgement suspect.

    21. Re:Wait a Minute! by joggle · · Score: 1
      It is the author that claims that hindus worship cows even though the article has the following quote "Cow in this country is like a mother" which I believe was the original poster's claim.

      I'm still not convinced. In one of the articles, it was discussed that cows are resting in the streets causing traffic jams as well as occasional accidents resulting in bodily harm to people. Now, if my mother was walking around aimlessly in the streets (perhaps because she is suffering from alzheimer disease), I certainly would endeavor to place her in an environment where she would not be able to do so, for her safety as well as the safety of the motorists. It is almost certain that the welfare of cows are often placed higher than the welfare of people in India which would imply that cows are regarded better than one's own mother.

    22. Re:Wait a Minute! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT IS PRACTICED....I saw a small girl get boiling water dumped on her from the parents of higher cast children that she made the mistake of playing with.

      She laid there on the side of the road and died.

      TO hell with India -- it is no better than China.

    23. Re:Wait a Minute! by donutello · · Score: 1

      You don't understand. If your able-bodied and sound-minded mother decided to walk around in the streets with the knowledge that traffic would stop for her and not injure her - and if you had the same respect for ones mother as the average Indian does, you would not stop her.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    24. Re:Wait a Minute! by donutello · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I can point you to links about racial attacks in the US too. I can also give you a google link. And I can counter your "muslimonline.com" and Pakistani newspaper links with tons of links to news articles on African American websites.

      None of this is going to prove that racial segregation is practiced in the US.

      And yes, CNN does make stuff up - all the time. And the guy you are refering to was posting a humorous article.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    25. Re:Wait a Minute! by thedigitalbean · · Score: 1

      Ok, lets dissect your statement into two portions, first the analogy of a mother walking aimlessly in the streets.

      Yes I agree, if my mother were talking around aimlessly I would endeavor to place her in an environment where she cannot, but that implies I have that ability. The simple fact is that is the people who own these cows may not have the ability to contain them. And lets look at it this way, if you a poor Indian and you have a choice of spending money on containing your cow or letting it roam knowing that no one will harm your cow, would you really spend that money?

      Now as for the second statement, "It is almost certain that the welfare of cows are often...". That as far as I am concerned is an opinion, one for which there is no fact to back up. You say "in India". Are you saying this is true for most Indians living in India or are you saying that there exists some set of people for which this statement is true. I will agree that there probably exist some people for which this is true, but this goes back to my original statement that no blanket statement can encompass a group of people, particularily a billion people.

      "...would imply that cows are regarded better than one's own mother."

      If your claim is that this statement holds true for a *majority* or even a vast number of people in India then I have to disagree with you. I have not seen any evidence to that effect.

      What I am trying to say is that you shouldn't form an opinion of an entire nation or entire group of people based on single incidents the media tells you about. Yes cows have been known to roam streets, no they aren't everywhere roaming every street halting all the traffic all the time causing accidents and deaths. The incidents you read about are single incidents in a vast country with a billion people, I ask you to look, read and understand with that in mind.

    26. Re:Wait a Minute! by bluFox · · Score: 1
      If you saw a crime being committed , what did you do to prevent it , assuming that you were a tourist at that location, you could have helped the child , and reported to the police,

      and i know for a fact that foreigners are taken *very seriously* in india mostly due to the fact that in most locations one $ is more than enough money to provide a person with food for a single day,

      and your help &/ complaint would have gone a far way to save the little girl you saw.

      --
      ~561
    27. Re:Wait a Minute! by thedigitalbean · · Score: 1

      Its funny, both of you bash each other, but do not realize how similar you both are. By both I mean the "westerner" and the "American-basher".

      I think both of your lack an fuller understanding of the other and base your beliefs of the other on what he media tells or what you see on the surface.

      The typical "American-basher" thinks all Americans are decadant, corrupt money grubbing bastards who would sell their own mother if it would make him money. They think Americans have no respect for anyone particularily non-Americans. The tragedy is that is this is simply not true, many Americans are respectful, knowledgeable, ethical people. Noted there are some that aren't, but "American-bashers" shouldn't bash an entire society or group of people because of some noted exceptions.

      On the other hand the typical "westerner" bases his/her views of the world on what the media tells them, on a particular negative event the media chooses to portray. They see a report or stry of horrendous acts commited against someone of a lower caste and choose to believe this is a regular occurance and accepted practice in the entire country. So I say those "westerners" should judge an entire nation or society based on what little tidbits the media decides to feed you.

      So I propose to both sides before you go about bashing the other, try to learn exactly who you are bashing, try puttng yourself in their shoes, try to see what it is they are talking about, rather than rant and rave and generalize.

    28. Re:Wait a Minute! by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      You are right racial segregation *is* prcticed in the US. You will notice that neither the orginal poster nor myself claimed that the pratice was not against the law simply that it is today still practiced. Just as racism is alive and well in the US. Yes CNN does make stuff up but read the article. It rings true. The other point is that yes Hindus do in fact worship cows no matter what kind of a face they try and put on it.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    29. Re:Wait a Minute! by bluFox · · Score: 1

      The problem affecting our casts is not social status but lack of money and / education, Other wise it is an advantage to be of *the lower cast* you mentioned because of Reservation of jobs , seats in parlement and preferential treatment in lones and other things.

      I hold my cast in high estime because it is a cast that has a long history and we took pride in our work and were reknowned for it. and i do not consider it a lower cast just because we had a little less money

      ps:, your comment is more like assuming that you are a white because you say race does not matter in us(i do believe that majority of us citizens do not view race as an all important factor).

      --
      ~561
    30. Re:Wait a Minute! by joggle · · Score: 1
      You are correct. In that circumstance, I would not physically restrict her movement as, for no other reason, that would be illegal. However, I would try to reason with her and try to convince her that it would be best if she didn't continue roaming the streets as it is a burden for drivers to stop for her sake all of the time.

      Now, how can you possibly try to reason with a cow and urge it to refrain from walking in the streets? It is, in fact, impossible, as the creature is not sentient! So, I would argue cows are certainly not sound-minded whatsoever, at least by human standards and should not be treated as if they were sentient.

    31. Re:Wait a Minute! by pyrrho · · Score: 1

      define "sentient"

      --

      -pyrrho

    32. Re:Wait a Minute! by joggle · · Score: 1

      Generally, the ability to reason is sufficient to be sentient.

    33. Re:Wait a Minute! by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      And if you did not like that other link try this one. Note I can not speak for the first poster but I'm not saying there is anything wrong with cow worship and it is in my mind no more wacky than much of what the western world worships but the facts are that they do in fact worship cows and it is not some mother thing.

      http://www.caribbeanhindu.com/Gandhi_speaks.htm

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    34. Re:Wait a Minute! by cybercuzco · · Score: 2
      As opposed to living in a country, where because of an accident of birth, you can become President even if you are a dunce!



      Or the King 'O England

      --

    35. Re:Wait a Minute! by Lord+Jester · · Score: 1

      Um... Not exactly...

      Sentient has 6 matches at dictionary.com. The word reason is not in one of them. Your definition is in line with the beliefs of the Star Trek universe.

    36. Re:Wait a Minute! by donutello · · Score: 2

      I am by no means an American-basher. The US is the country I've chosen to live in and in my book that counts for much more than someone who just happened to be born here.

      However, there are concepts that the average westerner does not have the background to grasp - respect for elders as practiced in Asia is one of those concepts. Similarly, there are concepts which the average person from (name your culture) is not able to grasp - such as why plagiarism in a class report is wrong or why it is so bad to cheat on a test.

      Pointing that out doesn't make a an American fanboy or an American basher.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    37. Re:Wait a Minute! by raptor21 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The first site is pakistani which rules it out. I would gladly send you a few hundred accounts of women being treated much worse in pakistan. A majority of the others you point out are muslim sites which also rule them out. Do you know how they treat women in parts of the muslim world? Have you heard of female genital mutilation? Lastly one of them is written by a beef lover who obviously can't fathom the idea that he can't eat all the cows in india.

      In fact a lot of the sites you pointed out look madeup.

      I dare you to find pork in an islamic country. And what about snake worshippers in the US.

    38. Re:Wait a Minute! by zulux · · Score: 2



      Ahem...

      I wasen't "bashing" the rest of the world, just a particular narrow-minded individual who happens to think that America = McDonalds * The H-Bomb + Porn. I've learned that the entire world is somewhat simelar in many respects - It's rather useless to catagorise people by race, and even more useless to catagorise people base on the physical locqtion of their domicile.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    39. Re:Wait a Minute! by zulux · · Score: 2



      But don't you get it: YOU ARE AMEICAN! Damn it. YOU ARE PART OF AMERICA.

      If you respect your elders then by definition, America has respect for elders.

      I have a Vietnamise friend that suffers the same sense of distance - he merried here, made his home here and had his children here and yet sees himself apart from America. We native born need to do a better job of making people welcomed, and the recent immigrants need to reasise that they are now part of this rather odd expeiment known as America.

      Welcome.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    40. Re:Wait a Minute! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The statement that untouchability is not practised in India is BS. I am an Indian.. and no, I get no kicks from trashing my nation.. But let us not state something that is completely untrue... untouchability is still practised in large parts of the nation.. there have been laws against it for the past 50 odd years, but it hasn't made a lot of difference..

      The fact that many political parties campaign based on caste is no secret.. neither is the fact that many of these same parties did nothing when the 5 lower caste people were killed recently - some of these parties (BJP) even had partners organizations (VHP) who came out with statements that the life of a cow is more sacred than that of 5 lower caste people. BJP (the ruling party) did not even venture to take action against the VHP for these statements.

      It is also widely accepted that many temples are not open to lower caste folk.. and that the lower caste folk are rarely accepted into the priesthood.

      By the way, even other religions such as Christianity in India have practised these caste/class based discrimination before... though the incidence of this happening within the Christian church is far less common than in the case of the Hindu establishment.

    41. Re:Wait a Minute! by code_martial · · Score: 1

      Do you know how they treat women in parts of the muslim world? Have you heard of female genital mutilation?

      Islam was the religion that abolished female infanticide among Pagan Arabs and it preaches a high degree of respect for women. You're hazarding generalization based on the acts of some lunatics / illiterates / superstitious people.

    42. Re:Wait a Minute! by jaoswald · · Score: 1

      Actually, after having done some research, I must apologize. GWB was, after all, born in Midland, Texas. I had been misled by some Texans who didn't think he had been born there.

    43. Re:Wait a Minute! by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      What about them see my other post about wacky stuff in the US. The thing that cracks me up is that people get all up in arms over this. The simple fact is that Hindus worship cows. Nothing wrong with that nothing wrong with anyone worshiping what they want as long as they don't hurt others. BTW do a google on Gahndi and cow-protection and you will see that there are many Hindu sites out there quoting Gahndi saying that they do worship cows and that is is a religous thing. Go reread my first post there was nothing negative about it. Yes some of the google hits where to Islamic websites and yes upon reading them some of there comment was not so good. So I will post the following.

      http://www.caribbeanhindu.com/Gandhi_speaks.htm

      Now deny that. Once more since this seems hard for some of you to swallow I don't care what Hindus worship and in fact find it odd that soo many of you seem offended at a simple statement of facts.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    44. Re:Wait a Minute! by joggle · · Score: 1
      Whatever you call it, I'm sure you'll agree with me that cows do not have the ability to reason. From my own personal experience, they are not, by any means, one of the most intelligent creatures on the face of this planet.

      I've seen areas where there are large numbers of cows (in Texas and Colorado) and they can, in fact, roam freely around some roads. However, these are always slow, country roads with low volumes of traffic and a low speed limit and, ultimately, there is always a fence to prevent them from roaming too far or near a highway with higher speed limits and/or greater traffic.

  23. Re:Awright! by moonbender · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Indian government is Karma whoring!

    --
    Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
  24. Is that ... by Frag-A-Muffin · · Score: 2

    Madhya Pradesh in the background I see laughing?

    --

    AirSpeak - http://itunes.com/apps/AirSpeak
  25. Will this destroy MS? by riven1128 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can see it now.. in 10 years on FOX we'll see a "Where are they now" featuring Bill Gates.. you'll have to explain to your children who this bad man was.

    Maybe he'll be working for sun in the mail room..?

    I can dream can't I?

    1. Re:Will this destroy MS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want justice, make him work a level one help desk job supporting his own software.

    2. Re:Will this destroy MS? by Dirtside · · Score: 2
      Maybe he'll be working for sun in the mail room..?
      With any luck, he'll be working in a mail room on the sun.
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    3. Re:Will this destroy MS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Your dream will not happen unless he is either gets criminally charged, or civlilly sued, personally.

      The problem with Bill Gates himself, is that he has already turned a lot of Microsoft stock into cash, by selling it to other suckers. So even in the unlikely event that Microsoft were completely destroyed, their assets liquidated to partially compensate the victims, it's too late. Gates himself has already gotten away with his crimes and will have profited from it. He has his own cashpile that is seperate from Microsoft's.

      He is set for life, unless he is somehow made to personally account for what he did. I don't think there's any real basis for civil suits, but it would make sense (though it really won't happen) for him to be criminally charged. I guess what I'm saying, is that mail room at Sun is isn't likely to happen, unless it's in a very distant future and occurs after he gets out of jail or something like that.

    4. Re:Will this destroy MS? by HorrorIsland · · Score: 1

      Forget 10 years. In a hundred years Bill Gates will remembered for this, and be considered one of the greatest humanitarians of all time.

    5. Re:Will this destroy MS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He would have to work REALLY hard to spend all his money in 10 years...

    6. Re:Will this destroy MS? by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      Yep.

      "Bill Gates: MS destroyed by antitrust. Vendors flocked away from proprietary software. Now living on his own private island in the Carribean, served by nubile young women, funded by the billions he still has." ;)

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    7. Re:Will this destroy MS? by Trogre · · Score: 2

      Maybe he'll be working for sun in the mail room..?

      Not likely. Bill, and the senior members of the board of directors will be unemplyable in the techology industry.

      The Sun mail room would have too many waste paper baskets for him to rummage in and find code snippets.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  26. Meet the new boss by Gizzmonic · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Linux prepares to take the reigns of government in an (admittedly) impoverished state. The minister of state conveys his commitment to free and public software. A symbolic victory on this hand.

    But what about the growing perspective that Linux is free, and thus, is somehow "cheap"? If this and other third-world countries like South Africa continue to embrace Linux, will it lose points in the corporate boardroom?

    Already we have the KDE project, which continues to make a "Windows clone" desktop. New users may be confused by this desktop, and come to think of Linux as a cheap, third-rate alternative to Windows.

    Although Linux can't respectfully decline the Indian government's offer, perhaps some its senior officials (Torvalds, Cox etc) should distance themselves from this decision. Otherwise, it we may be hearing "cheap Linux crap!" as often as our racist forefathers used to say "cheap Japanese crap!"

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    1. Re:Meet the new boss by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2
      But what about the growing perspective that Linux is free, and thus, is somehow "cheap"? If this and other third-world countries like South Africa continue to embrace Linux, will it lose points in the corporate boardroom?

      Well now that all depends. If foreign based companies and governments start kicking ass with it, I'd think that would give US corporations pause.

      Imagine if some debt-ridden 3rd world country is able to pay off its national debt because they don't have to re-buy software every 18 months. I think that'd turn some heads.

      Besides, India's not really a 3rd world country anyway. They have nuclear capability. Sure, there standard of living there is different and many over there are unimaginably poor, but they are highly advanced in sciences and technology -- particularly mathematics and computer science.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    2. Re:Meet the new boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "reins of government", though your version has a pleasing apposite quality. Anyone know the term for a homophone who's meaning is relevant to the context? You've got my troll alarm blaring with this. You've been modded insightful twice though, who am I to question the infallibility of moderators...on crack.

    3. Re:Meet the new boss by proxima · · Score: 2

      What you call a clone I call a more enjoyable desktop experience. I've used KDE since the 1.x days, and I've been pleased to see several features implemented in KDE well before I saw it in the latest Windows version.

      Take, for example, grouped tasks on the taskbar; I don't know at what point it became part of KDE or Windows exactly, but I distinctly remember using it in KDE for some time before seeing it in the latest Windows beta.

      Another example would be built-in theme support that actually significantly changes the way the desktop looks. I'm talking widgets, borders, icons, etc. I agree that this feature is mere fluff and even unwanted in certain environments, but the ability for KDE to look and act like several environments is a strong feature in my view. As an example, for about the past month I tried out the "Mac OS" style menu - all my KDE menus showed up at the top of the screen. This is supposedly better for ergonomics because one can fling his/her mouse towards the top of the screen and hit the menu more quickly than hunting it out. In addition, some people like the focus to move with the mouse, and most X wms support this easily.

      In the end, every UI uses common good ideas from the others. Mac OS X, Windows, KDE, GNOME, etc. all share a fair amount in common - to call any of them simply a "clone" of the other is oversimplified. To me, KDE makes a desktop experience that's relatively easy to learn, yet packs an incredible system for customization.

      The biggest risk of Linux being branded as "cheap" is offering it as a "Windows replacement" on the cheapest of computers (like Walmart is doing). Putting it on cheap computers is fine, but I'd like to see some Linux ready mid level and high end machines be more advertised to the masses.

      --
      "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
    4. Re:Meet the new boss by Tony-A · · Score: 2

      Linux is free, yes.
      Linux is cheap, don't think so.
      IBM dumping a billion US dollars per year into Linux isn't cheap.
      Linux can be obtained cheaply, very cheaply, but since the break-even point of what is *worthwhile* doing is very different, the TCO of Linux may well be greater than that of Microsoft Windows. What *will* be done with Linux is not the same as what will be done with Microsoft Windows.
      ( IBM may well be right in that they "more than got their money back" ;)

    5. Re:Meet the new boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who cares?

      if it works for me and it's cheaper i can save my money for something else, i think it's a good thing.

      Athlon XP isn't as powerful as Pentium 4 but it's enough for me and it's much cheaper, same thing for linux and the "japanese crap", does it works for me? yes, who cares where is made it, how is made it, it's cheaper and works, that's all

    6. Re:Meet the new boss by Sloppy · · Score: 2
      New users may be confused by this desktop, and come to think of Linux as a cheap, third-rate alternative to Windows.
      That won't stop 'em. After all, they got over Windows being a cheap third-rate alternative to MacOS. ;-)

      (Moderators: no hard feelings if you wanna call this flamebait. I deserve it. I've been a baaad boy.)

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    7. Re:Meet the new boss by gmack · · Score: 2

      The words "cheap Japanese crap" was more a result of the quality rather than price They fixed that and now look where they are.

      I don't see why anyone needs to distance themselves from this at all.

    8. Re:Meet the new boss by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      That might be a danger if Linux were actually crap.

      I think the point you are ignoring is that in the 70s and 80s the vast majority of goods imported from Japan (and China, Taiwan, Korea, etc) were, in fact, poor quality, cheaply made, CRAP! Similarly, that goods of poor quality were refered to as "K-Mart Kuality" was a direct result of the fact that K-Mart sold low quality crap! These stereotypes, and the phrases/epithets they spawned, didn't just appear out of nowhere. In the majority of cases they were simple statements of fact.

      Also, I think calling KDE a "Windows clone" is absurd. While there are some basic similarities, those similarities are generally also shared with other GUIs such as Aqua, namely general default placement of toolbars and desktop icons, and the placement of basic window controls. The actual function, and functionality, of the two environments is quite different.

      Which brings me to my final point, which is that while Linux may lack visual polish, it is quite often functionally superior to Windows. I think it is much more likely that we will be hearing "damned Microsoft crap!" (especially since I hear that regularly right now, and have never heard anyone say "cheap Linux crap!").

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    9. Re:Meet the new boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite true. I believe that India falls into the general 2nd world category. Not up to par with the rich nations of the world, but head and shoulders above the poor 3rd world nations.

    10. Re:Meet the new boss by Dionysus · · Score: 2

      Dialog boxes are often copied from Windows. It used to be that you logged out of your session. Microsoft changed it to login as another user. In the latest KDE I have tested (3.0), you also login as another user instead of logout (which I think is confusing). So, to say the KDE people doesn't copy Windows, good or bad, is just plain wrong.

      --
      Je ne parle pas francais.
    11. Re:Meet the new boss by jpetts · · Score: 2

      Otherwise, it we may be hearing "cheap Linux crap!" as often as our racist forefathers used to say "cheap Japanese crap!"

      The relevant part being used to say.

      People used to say that you couldn't install Linux unless you were an expert hacker. People used to say that Linux would never have a workable desktop. People used to say lots of things. However, nowadays one hears the wonderful sounds of a lot of such unwisely spoken words being eaten.

      In addition to which, the Indian subcontinent has a lot of incredibly smart and motivated IT professionals, who - and this is very important - are used to a collaborative working environment, and pulling together to make things happen: far more so than the Western hemisphere. My money says that if anybody will make this work, it will be the Indians. Smart people will be keeping an eye on their progress: even smarter people will be learning from it.

      This could be a potentially huge boost for the credibility of a widely distributed Linux infrastructure which can be made to serve a very immature computing market. I drink heartily to its success...

      --
      Call me old fashioned, but I like a dump to be as memorable as it is devastating - Bender
    12. Re:Meet the new boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No... what I frequently hear from people who are switching to Linux is "how the hell do I get this thing to do *this*?" and then after they are shown how, then say "why the hell did they put it there? it makes no sense" or "how the hell am I supposed to remember to type that gobbldygook every time?" =)

    13. Re:Meet the new boss by proxima · · Score: 2

      So, to say the KDE people doesn't copy Windows, good or bad, is just plain wrong.

      Please re-read my post. I didn't say that KDE people don't copy Windows. In fact, I said, "In the end, every UI uses common good ideas from the others."

      My main point was that to say KDE is a clone of Windows is an incorrect simplification. I've seen innovative things come from KDE and things that have originated from Windows, Mac, etc. All UIs take ideas from others - but that's because these things work. You'll notice that some (not quite there yet) dialogs in KDE use verbs for their buttons instead of "OK" and "cancel" - that's good UI design that probably appeared first in Mac OS. Windows would be wise to implement the same.

      --
      "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
    14. Re:Meet the new boss by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      And new Windows users don't say exactly the same things?

      If you're going to criticize Linux, you could at least come up with something that doesn't apply equally to every single OS on the planet.

      There is no such thing as an intuitive interface. A famous computer guy once said that the only intuitive interface is the nipple; he was wrong. Both mother and child have to learn how to nurse, as he would have found out had he actually consulted with someone who knew something about breastfeeding.

      What is my point? That nothing is intuitive, only familiar. Anyone who moves to a different OS and expects things to be exactly the same is an idiot. And honestly, once you look at the actual reasoning, the average Linux distro arranges things far more sensably that Windows does. It just seems stupid and backwards at first because it's unfamiliar.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  27. Population in India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So if all of India changes to Linux (which would be a much bigger step, of course) that would be like 800 billion people using Linux.

    Think of a beowulf ... oh, nevermind

    1. Re:Population in India by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1

      The population of India is 1 billion, you dumbass not 800 billion.
      I don't think even the world population is remotely near that number.
      And out of these about 30-40 % literate and say about 1 % computer savvy. And aount 0.0001 % linux users.
      Still 0.0001 % of 1 B. is a substansial number.
      But knowing the indian politicians at first hand, I would suspect this is just a trick to get some Dollars from bill G.

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    2. Re:Population in India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't you mean 100 people? since nearly no one in india can afford a computer past a 286, i doubt linux will be doing much of anything their. I think they need to focus on FOOD and MEDICINE for their people than becoming involved in the politics of software. If i were a starving Indian, I doubt I would give three shits if my country were switching to linux.

    3. Re:Population in India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So if all of India changes to Linux (which would be a much bigger step, of course) that would be like 800 billion people using Linux. "
      "800 billion people" ??? What school did you go to ?

    4. Re:Population in India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he was over exagerating on purpose hence the reference to a beowulf cluster...

    5. Re:Population in India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The population of the EARTH is about 6 billion - it is an obvious overstatement.

      hyperbole ( P ) Pronunciation Key (h-pûrb-l)
      n.
      A figure of speech in which exaggeration is used for emphasis or effect, as in I could sleep for a year or This book weighs a ton.

      "Double dumbass on you!"

    6. Re:Population in India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmmmmm... you need help!

      Here's a small php script I coded to help you grok parent post:

      ###
      ### Lame detector
      ###
      define("JOKE","The population of India is 1 billion, you dumbass not 800 billion.");
      define("USUCK_READ_MORE","I don't think even the world population is remotely near that number.");

      ###
      ### Main section
      ###

      echo '"'.JOKE.'"=JOKE!!!! Get a life!; ';
      echo '"'.USUCK_READ_MORE.'"= You think!??!?';

  28. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by sisukapalli1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Most of the cybercafes in India are used primarily to send email (hotmail, yahoo, rediffmail, etc.) Some are used for chatting (simple messenger programs). For lots of online games, or "fancy pr0n", the cafes simply don't have enough bandwidth.

    For simple things like getting info on web, web based email, and simple chatting, no difference between linux and windows.

    S

  29. Yes you are by kiwimate · · Score: 5, Informative

    First paragraph. Third sentence.

    Chief minister Digvijay Singh personally conveyed this to Microsoft boss Bill Gates during an interaction last week in New Delhi.

  30. Free beer or speech? by Beatbyte · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I would speculate whether or not this is because of the cost or the freedom.

    I know they have better things to spend money on than client licenses for MS stuff. I do think its a great push for linux worldwide BUT I would just happen to think the free as in speech part is just a plus for not having to pay (as much w/ TCO).

    Either way, I wish our own government would use linux. As it would be a great push away from the monopoly that they "punished".

    In related news... The U.S. government flunked a computer-security review for the third consecutive year

    1. Re:Free beer or speech? by Tom · · Score: 2

      Either way, I wish our own government would use linux. As it would be a great push away from the monopoly [microsoft.com] that they "punished".

      Yeah, funny isn't it? You'd think they don't deal with convicted felons or the likes of them.

      Shows you how much power the government really has. Just enough to bully a few tiny foreign nations (Iraq has 16 mio. people - that is what? twice LA ?) but not enough to take a stand against found-guilty corporations within their own borders.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    2. Re:Free beer or speech? by Darby · · Score: 2

      Yeah, funny isn't it? You'd think they don't deal with convicted felons or the likes of them.

      Yeah, funny like how Poindexter, convicted felon, traitor, high level mover in the international drug cartel is now in charge of Big Brother's database of all information about you.

      Putting a bullet in the head of any member of the American government is an act of Patriotism at this point.

    3. Re:Free beer or speech? by Atzanteol · · Score: 2

      *ahem*

      Being declared a "monopoly" is a far cry from being declared a "convicted felon"...

      Facts are a stubborn thing...

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    4. Re:Free beer or speech? by Shelled · · Score: 2

      It would be much better for the advance of linux if the Indian governent chose is solely on the basis of lower TCO. Corporate boardrooms aren't known as fervent breeding grounds of free speech. The language spoken is pure TCO.

    5. Re:Free beer or speech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft were convicted of criminal violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The corporation (since corporations are people in American Law... no, really, they are!) is a convicted felon.

      It's not illegal to be a monopoly. It's not a badge of crime to be declared a monopoly. It IS a crime to abuse that monopoly position. Companies that become monopolies are, in America and Europe, subject to all sorts of extra regulation by the government to preserve the illusion that The Free Market Works (tm).

  31. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by pubjames · · Score: 2

    India will continue to pirate as long as Microsoft leads everywhere else, though having the governor officially reject capitalism is a good step for socialism.

    Sorry? I assume that you are using your own special definitions of capitalism and socialism here, because I don't see how they've got anything to do with this Indian state deciding to use Linux for a particular project rather than Microsoft.

  32. Cost and Idealogy by Blindman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Obviously Microsoft cannot compete on price or flexibility. Microsoft's main advantage seems to be its pervasiveness and it ability to run Office. Even if Office is the best productivity suite available, is it so much better that it is worth the extra cost of the software and the O/S needed to run it?

    I'm just glad to see it when a customer wants something that Microsoft cannot and/or will not provide that they are willing to give Linux a chance. In this particular case, it looks like the decision wasn't made based on cost, but the cost of Linux is what made the decision possible.

    It guess people will generally choose freedom especiall when it is free (as in beer!).

    --
    I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person that I'm preaching to.
    1. Re:Cost and Idealogy by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And one other point that M$ usually takes great pains to make...think of the training costs to switch to Linux.

      To which I'd love to hear someone respond:

      "Yeah but that's money that goes back into OUR economy, not Bill's pockets"


      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    2. Re:Cost and Idealogy by binaryDigit · · Score: 5, Informative

      Even if Office is the best productivity suite available, is it so much better that it is worth the extra cost of the software and the O/S needed to run it?

      Damn skippy it would be. Remember, companies don't use OS's, they use applications. This is why SGI used to be so successful even though their stuff was ungodly expensive compared to other solutions, they provided tools to let people get done what they needed to get done in the best way possible. Hell, if you could get your hands on a piece of software that made you 25% more efficient at doing your job (of course this is in absolutely no way implying that office does this, this is just a generalzation), wouldn't you sink an extra $500 to acquire it? In a heartbeat you would.

      The main point being that in the end, the OS don't mean squat, its the apps that run on it. "Minor" cost variances in the OS doesn't save you much in the long term if you can't get the apps that will help you do your job better. This is why M$ dominates on the desktop, but is losing more ground in the server room, Windoze is a desktop oriented OS, Linux is (was) not. Linux makes inroads in the server space because the applications available more readily lend themselves to that.

    3. Re:Cost and Idealogy by MrResistor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even if Office is the best productivity suite available, is it so much better that it is worth the extra cost of the software and the O/S needed to run it?

      Not to people who have no need for the alleged additional functionality that Office provides. I have yet to encounter a task that I could do with Office that can't do just as well, and often more easily, with OpenOffice and Mozilla.

      If that is true for me, a person who is very familiar with MS products, then I think it is certainly true for someone from the backwaters of India who has little, if any, experience with computers at all.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    4. Re:Cost and Idealogy by RealAlaskan · · Score: 2
      Hell, if you could get your hands on a piece of software that made you 25% more efficient at doing your job (of course this is in absolutely no way implying that office does this, this is just a generalzation), wouldn't you sink an extra $500 to acquire it? In a heartbeat you would.

      Yep, you're right. That's what makes it so strange that so many people persist in using Windows and proprietary software in general.

      I do quite a bit of writing, and a bit of statistical programming. GNU emacs and LaTeX and R increased my productivity by quite a lot [1]; I'm sure that it was more than a 25% increase. I would have paid to get that, but of course I didn't have to.

      I think that a lot of the reason that folks hang on to Windows et cetera is that they define their tasks in terms of the software they use, as in: ``I use MS Word'' rather than ``I write things'', or ``I use SAS'' rather than ``I work with data''.

      Of course, if your job is to have MS Word on the screen all day, you're going to be most productive running Windows. If your job is to write structured documents with meaningful content, you're going to be most productive using something suited to the job, and that's not a word processor, on any OS.

      [1] The increased productivity is in comparison to running MS Word, MS Excel and SAS on Windows.

    5. Re:Cost and Idealogy by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 2

      Hell, if you could get your hands on a piece of software that made you 25% more efficient at doing your job (of course this is in absolutely no way implying that office does this, this is just a generalzation), wouldn't you sink an extra $500 to acquire it? In a heartbeat you would.

      Not if I only made $500/year.

    6. Re:Cost and Idealogy by Decimal · · Score: 2

      Obviously Microsoft cannot compete on price or flexibility.

      They could, but they won't. Instead, they make massive profits on MS-Office and MS-Windows and use the extra money to fund their many other ventures which lose money. X-Box is a good example. The goal is to survive long enough in these other arenas to become profitable there, too. Chances are that eventually they will.

      This is why Linux will never kill Microsoft, only make chinks in the armor.

      --

      Remember "Bring 'em on"? *sigh
    7. Re:Cost and Idealogy by Decimal · · Score: 2

      I have yet to encounter a task that I could do with Office that can't do just as well, and often more easily, with OpenOffice and Mozilla.

      Hey, you can? Keen - perhaps you could help me out. I've been trying to do this in OpenOffice for some time. Here is the task:

      Press the "Enter" key and have the cursor move down exactly one line.

      --

      Remember "Bring 'em on"? *sigh
    8. Re:Cost and Idealogy by Trogre · · Score: 2

      FWIW, I have been an extensive MS Office user for several years, and have spent the last six months trialing OpenOffice.org.

      I find OOo much easier to use than MSO, and I can get stuff done faster. MSO just doesn't appear very flexible.

      The only benefits of MSO to me are:
      1. Inclusion of a pseudo-database (Access)
      2. Ability to run the latest viruses (Outlook and Visual Basic macros)

      If MSO was 'free', and OOo was payware, I'd still pay for OOo rather than go back to MSO.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    9. Re:Cost and Idealogy by binaryDigit · · Score: 2

      OK, you listed the "benefits" of MSO and you say that OOo is "easier to use" and that MSO isn't "flexible", could you be a bit more specific? I would like to take a look at OOo and would be interested in the perspective of someone who has used both.

    10. Re:Cost and Idealogy by jelle · · Score: 2

      MSOffice _more_ productive? On what planet?

      Just this week, I had to rush out a large document for a customer. But it needed some final preparations before I could send it off. I opened it, in word2000 (the company standard...), started editing, moving things around, etc, and poof. An error box pops up and bye bye word2000. Restarting word, document not recovered, it just showed a new empty document. Oh great! And this is on win2000, so don't blame it on winme. Anyways, here is the switch ad: So I ditched word2000 and used OpenOffice and finished the document in time without any problems.

      Where do all these myths come from that MSOffice is more productive than the other office suites? If it's not MS FUD, then it's got to be inexperience using any of the other office suites out there.

      If it's the only ice cream you've ever had, you'll think it's the greatest... even if it's not.

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    11. Re:Cost and Idealogy by jelle · · Score: 2

      "I would like to take a look at OOo"

      Why not try it out yourself?

      My experience is, more reliable (less crashes and lost work), and much less annoyances dealing with the IT department to get licenses for the desktop, laptop, etc. The only drawbacks I've encountered is first a much slower startup time, but that is only for the first document, and second it's very close but still not 100% capable of reading and writing MS formats with no formatting mistakes.

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    12. Re:Cost and Idealogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ???? That works for me. You're trolling.

      Or maybe you have your end-paragraph style set to +1.5 or something (versions of word up to word 95 used to do this, actually)

    13. Re:Cost and Idealogy by Decimal · · Score: 2

      No, it moves down a full 2 lines. I can't find a setting to change this in the options menu.

      --

      Remember "Bring 'em on"? *sigh
  33. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by LordNimon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Since when is Linux pro-socialism and anti-capitalism? I thought the point behind capitalism is that the best product/service wins, without any help from having an illegal monopoly?

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
  34. India ... by vrai · · Score: 5, Interesting
    ... is hardly a 'small 3rd world country'. It has a population of over a billion and is the world's largest democratic nation. Admittedly we're only talking about one state here, but this is far more significant than say Greece (first world-ish but insignificant) switching to Linux.

    Just to make it more amusing though is the fact that Microsoft retained a large number of Indian coders during the XP 'debugging' cycle; nice to see they're not afraid to bite the hand that occasionaly feeds.

    1. Re:India ... by Mignon · · Score: 2
      we're only talking about one state here

      The "profile" link on the state's portal page reports the population as "6,03,85,118." I'm not familiar with this notation, but I'm guessing that means about 60 million people. This strikes me as a reasonably large state - about 17th the total population (of 1.045 billion, according to the CIA) while there are 28 Indian states.

    2. Re:India ... by Single+GNU+Theory · · Score: 3, Insightful
      this is far more significant than say Greece (first world-ish but insignificant) switching to Linux

      I have to disagree with you there. IMO, every switch to Linux and friends is significant.

      Saying Greece is insignificant would be like saying New Hampshire (pretty small by most counts such as area and population) doesn't amount to much in U.S. Presidential elections.

      --
      Little Debian: America's #1 Snack Distro!
    3. Re:India ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The "profile" link on the state's portal page [mp.nic.in] reports the population as "6,03,85,118." I'm not familiar with this notation, ..."

      That notation uses lakhs and crores (vernacular terms which have creeped into Indian english.)

      A lakh (pronounced 'laa kh') is 1/10th million and crore (ka-ror[d]) is 10 million. The d in the second pronounciation is soft.

      Going over to your main point. Not really. MP is one of those in-between states (the name literally means Middle State for its geographical location in India.) The really important states are Maharashtra (capital : Bombay), Karnataka (capital : Bangalore) and Andhra Pradesh (capital : Hyderabad). Introduce residing changes here and the rest of the country will follow.

    4. Re:India ... by thegnu · · Score: 1

      He said: "[Microsoft will] just take over another small 3rd world country"

      That wasn't necessarily a comparison to India, but all the other 3rd world countries that MS has taken over.

      Like Mexico. I administrate an internet cafe in San Jose del Cabo, and I soon want to setup a distro of Linux, but the masses aren't ready. And I have no PC at home on which to run through pitfalls :(....
      I also think it's "Vive la resistance"
      I'm no French scholar, though.

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    5. Re:India ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's: Vive la résistance!

      The acute accent and the exclamation point are mandatory. ;-)

    6. Re:India ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...It has a population of over a billion and is the world's largest democratic nation... Not to mention that it's the 4th largest economy in the world.

  35. Ha! by Ivan+Raikov · · Score: 3, Informative

    That after yesterday's article, Microsoft freebies turn India gov. against open-source. Oh, the sweet, sweet irony!

    1. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the article, Bill Gates is quoted as saying:

      • "We can save money in terms of speed of development or by being able to run on less expensive hardware."

      Let's see here. Linux can run on a 386 with 1 Mb of RAM. Even on a low end Pentium/x86 system, you can run newer versions of Linux w/ XWindows. Not to mention Linux being more stable/secure than Windows, which in a government setting, would be important I would imagine.

      Try running XP Professional (which I would assume M$ is giving India) or even 2000 on a Pentium 75 with 16 MB of RAM.

  36. In Other News... by zenofjazz · · Score: 1
    First we have the Amazing Linux PC's at Walmart, now a significant piece of Indian government says "no thanks" to the Microsoft tax... What's next?

    Air traffic controllers are reporting a number of flying pigs, around Redmond Washington... *grin*

    -You only think you saw me post this...

    --
    -- All That's Evil in the Geek Space ... Allthatsevil.wordpress.com
    1. Re:In Other News... by Rascalson · · Score: 1

      Your confused again Dan. Microsoft is a corporation that has 95% of the Desktop PC OS market. This gives them "Monopoly like" powers over that market and several adjoining markets. They have been convicted of abusing those powers contrary to established laws in the USA. . They recieved a minor slap on the wrist as a result, and will probably continue to try and do "what it is they do". All of which will mean absolutely didily squat in the long run as OSS/FS continues on with it's global spread. Nothing will change the facts of this matter.

      --
      prisoner# msce18xxxxx. Currently planning my escape.
    2. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As Ghandi said:
      First they laught at you
      Then they fight you
      Then you win

    3. Re:In other news... by Kombat · · Score: 2

      Sure. Mod me down. Censor me. If they can't hear me, it can't be true, right? But the truth is, Slashdot makes such a huge deal over tiny little token decisions like this, and ignores the literally hundreds of opposite decisions (i.e, choosing Microsoft) every day. I'm a Linux guy, but I don't think any service is done to Linux by trying to hide our own insecurities through modding down those who speak the truth.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
  37. GNU/Linux by sfraggle · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is RMS going to write to the Madhya State officials and complain that they called it "Linux" and not "GNU/Linux" now?

    --
    were you expecting to see a sig here? perhaps you'd rather see the inside of an ambulance!
    1. Re:GNU/Linux by epyT-R · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't these stupid jokes get tiresome after awhile? Post something intelligent or don't bother.

    2. Re:GNU/Linux by The+J+Kid · · Score: 1

      Nope.

      He'll say: "The Madhya State officials have got it."

      --
      Moderation: +4. Modded 70% Funny and 30% Overrated. 100% Saturated.
    3. Re:GNU/Linux by Dahan · · Score: 2

      Nope, not as long as RMS keeps insisting it's GNU/Linux, and calling himself its principal developer.

    4. Re:GNU/Linux by thelexx · · Score: 3, Informative

      Lot's of people claim that anti-MS sentiment is just sour eggs/jealousy of Gates and his success. I've always held that this was bullshit due to having a myriad of reasons to hate the company that have nothing to do with Gates himself. Now I find myself thinking the same thing, only it's of people throwing rocks at RMS. He is, if no longer _the_, certainly _a_ principal GNU developer. Where exactly has he claimed he's the principal Linux kernel developer? Credit where it's due, Linux as we know it would not exist but for the earlier efforts of RMS. So what are you're real reasons for not liking him? The way he looks? Because GNU/Linux sounds stupid? How he won't back down from his ideals? What?

      ------- from gnu.org:

      Richard Stallman

      Biography

      Richard Stallman is the founder of the GNU Project, launched in 1984 to develop the free operating system, GNU.

      Richard Stallman is the principal author of the GNU C Compiler, the GNU symbolic debugger (GDB), GNU Emacs, and various other GNU programs. Stallman currently serves as president of the Free Software Foundation.

      Linux and GNU/Linux

      The GNU Hurd is not ready for production use. Fortunately, another kernel is available. In 1991, Linus Torvalds developed a Unix-compatible kernel and called it Linux. Around 1992, combining Linux with the not-quite-complete GNU system resulted in a complete free operating system. (Combining them was a substantial job in itself, of course.) It is due to Linux that we can actually run a version of the GNU system today.

      We call this system version GNU/Linux, to express its composition as a combination of the GNU system with Linux as the kernel.

      --------

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    5. Re:GNU/Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long that it isn't COW/Linux, indians should be fine!

  38. Re:Michael, they prefer to be called Native Americ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YHBT, HAND, AD, schmuck.

  39. of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Japanese cars (etc.) now have a reputation for quality and reliability. So the cheap crap of one generation becomes the product with attractive value propositions down the road.

  40. Choice Quote by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    'For us it is not a question of Microsoft versus Linux. It is just a matter of choosing between a free software and a monopoly. We feel that when we are putting public information out in the open, then it should not be through a proprietary software.'

    Do you suppose Digvijay Singh reads slashdot?

    Meanwhile, deep in the bowels beneath stinking bowels beneath Redmond, a lone figure seeks comfort with his Ooky.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  41. Cybercafe and game by bayankaran · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ah...have you seen any Indian cybercafe...I am yet to see one in India running any of the games you mentioned.

    Microsoft doesnt raid Indian software blackmarket as they do in Taiwan and Malaysia because they need the next generation of Indian techies to practice and understand its products. And this means a wide availability of all the Windows flavors in most of the towns.

    Plus a computer you can get for Rs.30000 and upwards and if you are asking for Rs.10000 (around US$200) for an OS no one is going to buy that.

    This is the reason cybercafes are running XP/2000, not because of games.

    --
    Tat Tvam Asi
  42. A Question of Monopoly by airrage · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We feel that when we are putting public information out in the open, then it should not be through a proprietary software

    I find this quote quite fascinating. India is a nation-state where the top 5% of the population own all the wealth; essentially they have a monopoly on the other lower castes. All the public infrastructure is publicly owned (trains, electricity). Given all this I find it hard to believe that India has been affronted in some way by avoiding a monopoly. What I do believe is that Inida is a country where most are poor and the barriers to technology are extremely high. With Linux, or any free computer technology, that gate is lowered somewhat; though you still have to buy the hardware.

    What Linux really needs, I believe, to be the real market winner is to take on Microsoft on equal terms and win-out. Not some back-door, third-world country win, but a real win in the Fortune 500 cubicles of corporate America. But it's a start, and as Gandhi said, "A journey of a thousand miles, starts with just one step."

    "How do you like your shackles?"
    "Oh, they are quite a nice fit!"
    "Excellent, we made them with Linux."

    --
    "This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
    1. Re:A Question of Monopoly by kalidasa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I find this quote quite fascinating. India is a nation-state where the top 5% of the population own all the wealth

      Unlike the US, where the top 5% of the population own something like 80% of the stocks, bonds and real estate.

      essentially they have a monopoly on the other lower castes.

      I'd be very careful about using the word "caste" if I were you; there's a lot of misinformation about what "caste" means.

      All the public infrastructure is publicly owned (trains, electricity).

      Unlike, say, Europe?

    2. Re:A Question of Monopoly by LoRider · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What Linux really needs, I believe, to be the real market winner is to take on Microsoft on equal terms and win-out. Not some back-door, third-world country win, but a real win in the Fortune 500 cubicles of corporate America.

      And then what will happen, you will stop using IE?

      Think about who has more users the government of India or a fortune 500 company?

      A not to everyone that thinks Linux is a failure as an OS because Fortune 500 companies in America aren't spending millions of dollars to switch, WHO CARES?

      --
      LoRider
    3. Re:A Question of Monopoly by bstadil · · Score: 2
      I'd be very careful about using the word "caste" if I were you; there's a lot of misinformation about what "caste" means.

      Take your pick, each one makes you sick.

      1 A race, a stock, a breed. obs. in gen. sense.

      2 A Hindu hereditary class of socially equal persons, united in religion and usu. following similar occupations, distinguished from other castes in the hierarchy by its relative degree of purity or pollution. Any more or less exclusive social class.

      3 The position conferred by membership of a caste.

      4 The system of division of society into castes.

      5 The form of a social insect having a particular function.

      Excerpted from Oxford Dictionary

      --
      Help fight continental drift.
    4. Re:A Question of Monopoly by Quixote · · Score: 2
      India is a nation-state where the top 5% of the population own all the wealth;

      Similarly, in the US, the top 5% own 95% of the wealth. Same is probably true for most countries (except the truly socialist/communist ones).

      essentially they have a monopoly on the other lower castes
      The richest dude in India, Azim Premji, is a moslem. What was that about castes again?

    5. Re:A Question of Monopoly by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

      Well, they *are* switching...just on the server instead of the desktop.

      Sooner or later, we'll nail 'em. More usability studies from Sun, new desktop paradigm, more WINE development or something.

      Linux is the sharpest knife Sun and IBM have ever had, and they're slavering at the chops at the thought of twisting it around in MS's guts.

    6. Re:A Question of Monopoly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The relevant meaning here is obviously 2).

      But I can honestly tell you that the importance of one's inherited caste is decreasing more than ever saving the conservative families. I'm from Bombay and from recent stays in rural Gujarat, I can tell you that caste is a diminishing factor in social behaviour.

    7. Re:A Question of Monopoly by Tom · · Score: 2

      All the public infrastructure is publicly owned (trains, electricity)

      Which, as any economist not blinded by neoliberal capitalism will tell you, can be a good thing. It all depends on how its run. Public transport especially tends to be best where it's publicly owned.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    8. Re:A Question of Monopoly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gandhi said, "A journey of a thousand miles, starts with just one step."

      It was Chinese proverb, and not said by Gandhi.

    9. Re:A Question of Monopoly by kalidasa · · Score: 2

      Which is exactly my point. My understanding is that caste more and more is coming to operate something like "nationality" (in the American sense of ethnicity, rather than the more European sense of citizenship) did in the US in the earlier part of the 20th century.

    10. Re:A Question of Monopoly by kalidasa · · Score: 2

      The richest dude in India, Azim Premji, is a moslem. What was that about castes again?

      Don't use the term Moslem, use Muslim. www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam

  43. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by Shillo · · Score: 2, Informative

    > WINE doesn't run CS, Starcraft, UT, and all the other online games that make third-world cyber cafes profitable.

    Wine in fact does run Starcraft. UT (and UT2003) are released natively for Linux. CS I don't know about.

    New games (which aren't likely to run on Wine) require the frequently upgraded hardware, which is too expensive for India anyway.

    Not that any of this matters; caffes will stop piracy when they get closed down because of it and no sooner. They also won't change the OS because it's simply a hassle.

    --

    --
    I refuse to use .sig
  44. Re:At least someone is making a stand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice try. I hope no-one moderates you up.

  45. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  46. Re:Awright! by Bonker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Mod parent up +1 Funny

    For those who don't understand Hindu (Very, very common religion in India), one of the basic premises of the religion is that people are reincarnated over and over again after they die until they generate enough Karma in the form of good deeds, positive experiences, and general learning and understanding that they reach a state of enlightenment and can proceed on from the cycle of mortal reincarnation to Nirvana-- a state of ultimate contentment with no worries, cares, needs, or demands.

    Thats why cows are sacred to Hindus... not because of some strange religious edict or a prejudice against beef, but because cattle seen as a higher, more enlightened life form than humans. While I make no pretense about my love of beef in the grilled-to-a-juicy-medium-rare sense, you have to admit that cows do more for the environment we do on an invidual basis (entire herds and livestock yards can be pretty polluting and are responsible for a lot of C02 emission, tho) and with remarkably fewer cares than a human.

    Karma has been westernized to mean the total of good deeds a person has and it's used here on Slashdot to indicate a measure of thoughtful posting, but don't forget that 'real' karma is the unmeasurable enlightenment you have acheived.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  47. Indian tech sophistication by MacAndrew · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been lurking during this debate over who will (re)colonize India -- Linux or MS -- and am perplexed by one thing, the alleged reluctance of the Indian gov't (which apparently decides some things province by province?) to adopt a scheme like Linux that might not be completely turnkey. Everything I've read suggests that India is one of the biggest producers of computer technical talent, as the Silicon Valley drive for the U.S. to grant more worker visas attests. Also, much of U.S. tech support is being outsourced to India because of cheap fiber optic lines, cheaper tech labor, and the large number of fluent English speakers. (I've read in the NYT that some customer support reps even make up little American lives for chit-chat with unaware clients on the phone.)

    So ... doesn't India have the homegrown talents, and why do they need state visits from RMS and BG to make up their minds? Why does it seem politicians are getting in the middle of all this? (Oops, answered my own question.)

    1. Re:Indian tech sophistication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets clarify something as an Indian.
      Whats reported is the policy of the State Govt of MadhyaPradesh (translate as centralprovince) and not the Indian govt. at the centre.
      Most Indian tech guys wants to earn money and raise their standard of living. They may be sympathetic to Linux but when in comes to money if MS technology gives them more higher paying job they will go for it. Ideology is difficult to maintain in a country where a car for a college student is a luxury. They want that car ASAP after securing a job stupid.
      Very few Indian politicians have any idea on technology , most of them are old or are from rural/trade union/labour background. They are bothered only with local peoples issues and not on some techie guys ideology , because most Indians will give a rats ass on such issues. Piracy in non-corporate world is rampant. Who will pay $100 on license where it can buy a months stock of raw food materials. One way of Indians embracing linux would be if Indian govt. cracks down heavy handedly on home piracy. No body will be willing to pay for license.
      Indian state govts are cash starved and will extend their arm to anybody willing to give them money.

      Yes India probably produce the most engineers but mark that only about 10 institutions will be of international standards. I studied from institution ranked between 10 - 20 and friends in comp sci always complained of poor faculty. Good comp sci students were essentially self taught in my college. Research was non existent. Good students never cmae back to academic life because govt. pay is peanuts compared to what they would get in corporate world .
      So not all Indian techies are of same calliber.

      I can go on and on , but things in India aren't exactly as you guys think. Maybe someday I will put my view on a website...

    2. Re:Indian tech sophistication by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      Some good points. But the thing is the gov't has to make a choice based on what is best to provide information to the population. It doesn't have to choose an OS based on wage-earning potential. It has to be very price-sensitive.

      If India could simply choose between Linux (free) and pirated MS (free) that would be one thing. But it is very different for the state to steal software versus individuals. India will not be eager to provoke protests from U.S. copyright holders, even if it declines to pursue private piracy. (Unlike China, India actually appears sensitive to U.S. pressure.) Bill Gates is doubtlessly aware India could just steal what it needs, and is offering cheaper deals to avoid that while earning some diplomatic points.

      Regardless of which OS is chosen, it will need support. I doubt the manpower is much greater for one over the other, and ultimately Linux would likely demand less supervision.

    3. Re:Indian tech sophistication by subzero_ice · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yes India probably produce the most engineers but mark that only about 10 institutions will be of international standards.

      I don't know if you read the newspapers or not but India does produce quality software engineers, and as far as the institutions in India are concerned I don't think you have heard of IIT's, IIS Banglore, Birla Institute of Technology and other State colleges which are equally good. Just a note the IITs are among the best institutions in the world.


      And just so that you know all major software companies employ a good number of Indians. If they didn't qualify as good programmers why do you think companies employed them.


      Please clarify international standards.



      A Proud Indian.
    4. Re:Indian tech sophistication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont understand why all the Indians who read slashdot make such a vociferous attempt to defend ourselves against the comments of a bunch of ignorant bubbas. Everytime there is a post on slashdot about India, out come the whines and slurs. Ignore them. There are a lot of better things that we can learn from Americans or any other country/culture for that matter. Our culture taught us to absorb. Let us focus on that. We are on our way to the top. AGAIN. Albeit slowly, but we ARE on our way. Lets focus on that. In a few years time when results start to bear fruit, let us take a moment to smile and reflect on our success. We may be monetorily poor today but we still have the wealth of an advanced culture behind us. We WILL get to where we WERE.
      This is a site that celebrates geekdom, a site that encourages learning and achievement. Let us absorb this knowledge. Let us continue to share our achievements and our knowledge with others too. Let us also applaud the geekdom of others.
      Let us learn to appreciate criticism even if it happens to come from the whining bubba who thinks all Indians wear turbans and are called Singh. Our humility is a virtue but is being perceived as a weakness by others. Let us not spend time defending against this since this defense only takes away more time from our offense.

      I am not an Anonymous Coward-my name is Vikram and I am INDIAN. I am posting as an Anonymous Coward only because Slashdot's email with my password has not reached me before I can post this.

    5. Re:Indian tech sophistication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am quite amused by this. The IIS in Bangalore is quite brilliant; I had the fortune to give a seminar there once. Ok, now you know I am biased. But to say that apart from some of the IITs there are equally brilliant State Colleges is like saying that the Massachusetts Institute of Technology is matched by (no offense, guys) San Francisco State University. Yes, you guessed it. I went to both:)

      Disclaimer: I love India, I married into an Indian family. But, please, world-class is applicable to about 10-15 institutions in the world.

    6. Re:Indian tech sophistication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. There are 6 IIT and 1 IIS + a few others = 10.
      I had BITS colleague and they werent great. I studied from top REC and few of my friends are damn good but they are essentially self taught , i.e they leant by reading books , discussing among themselves etc. The faculty had very little to do , so most students in the class suffer.

      2. I was talking about comp science students which is not the same as s/w engineer. There are many programmers who would retreive tables from database but who don't know database theory.

      3. Indians have one great virtue they work hard. I think that's why companies in US like them. I have worked with people from East European countries and their analytical skills were very good. We have much to learn , why do you think that India has so few IP rights associated with them ? Because we follow technology not innovate them.

      4. All this is beside the point I wanted to make. i.e Indian s/w engineers are good in work to earn money and position etc. but not good for causes such as Free s/w , ideology , privacy rights etc.
      The slashdotter was asking why we can't choose the right technology ourselves , why BG or RMS has to push us. Thats because as long as money is there to be made we dont care.

      Can you show me as many prominent Indians in Open source field as in say MS and Sun. You can't

      I am a proud Indian , but not a proud software engineer as I feel that I am not putting value to technology community through my work.

    7. Re:Indian tech sophistication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was not defending Indians , I was pointing out some misconception that slashdotters have on India. Driving out ignorance is something we always to in slashdot.
      If we move slowly its not enough we have to move fast. China is light years ahead already in overall economics. Software is only one business area we have to catch up in manufacturing also. There is no glory in being no 1 in s/w and earning 1$ if China is 10th in s/w and earns 100$ from other business. See in US some many prouducts are made in china and how many are made in India.

    8. Re:Indian tech sophistication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree with you. We need velocity and I'd rather focus on that. Let whining bubbas sleep... they aren't good competition anyway- Vikram

  48. bad news for Linux? by tps12 · · Score: 3, Troll

    Well, I guess I have to support the use of Linux for any sort of serious application. No such thing as bad publicity and all that. Plus, Linux is a perfect match in this case, since they can't afford anything non-free, and at the moment Linux is the best free OS (some would say it's the best OS period, but I'm not looking for a flamewar) out there. So that's good.

    One thing I've thought about a lot is the image that Linux has, in both the media and business worlds. It goes without saying that gaining a foothold in American industry is vital to the long-term success of Linux. But many corporations have been reluctant to switch to Linux due to its image as an OS used by outcasts, hippies, pirates, and hackers. We seem to be making some progress away from this, what with products like Lindows getting some press, but we have a long way to go.

    Now this comes along, and it's like we're being attacked from a whole new side. If Linux takes off in India, then we risk being associated with overpopulation, disease, tainted water supplies, and nucular warfare. What American company will consider using Linux after that? I wish there was a way to have it both ways, but I feel like the best thing for the Linux community to do at this point is to try to get India to switch to FreeBSD.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:bad news for Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh now I get it.
      People in India are starving to death,
      BSD is dying.

      match made in heaven.

      OK. go ahead mod me down. I was just counter-trolling

    2. Re:bad news for Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      File Not Found
      The requested URL was not found on this web server: /~tps12/
      File does not exist: /etc/httpd/data/~tps12/

      tps12 is not a valid username on this host (homa).

      You can search for a user's home page on the Columbia web servers.

      www.columbia.edu

      This Columbia University web server is powered by Apache/1.3.26 (Unix) mod_perl/1.27.
      The system software on this host is maintained by

      Help desk: (212) 854-1919
      webmaster@columbia.edu

    3. Re:bad news for Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But many corporations have been reluctant to switch to Linux due to its image as an OS used by outcasts, hippies, pirates, and hackers

      You forgot to mention faggots.

    4. Re:bad news for Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no idea how this flaimbait got modded so up so high, but I will bite the bullet and reply.

      What does linux use have to do with disease and tainted water supply? That two things occur together does not mean there is any causal relationship between the two. Correlation does not imply causality.

      Did I hear you say something when there was news of linux being in the "people's republic" of china ? Did you say overpopulation and nuclear program ?

      Any company american or otherwise will use an os
      if it suits there purpose of doing a task cheaply and effciently be it linux or shudder shudder windows.

      And just what kind of "freedom" are you talking about, when you are ready to deny the use linux to a certain part of the population to make sure that it is a success. The success of linux is in providing an alternative, and if anybody it should be bigots like you that linux community will do well to get rid of.

    5. Re:bad news for Linux? by tps12 · · Score: 1

      Ah, the bastards. I graduated a while ago, and I guess they finally got around to removing my web space. I'll get the page up on a new account sometime soon. Thanks for the heads-up, AC.

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  49. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by tshak · · Score: 2

    Since when did people work for large corporations and governments for free? So no, Linux isn't pro-socialism, but whatever it is I still don't get it.

    * I'm obviously not refering to the dev's that get paid at IBM to work on Linux. That's business. I'm talking about the vast majority of OSS developers who do not code OSS professionally.

    --

    There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
  50. it was 11:41am, joke was starting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    6. ?
    7. Profit!

    take off every 'zig'
    for great lameness!

  51. Re:Sweet! Less money for the U.S. and its citizens by f00zbll · · Score: 1

    hurray, hurray!!! Now US citizens should drive less, focus on family and less on accumulating gobs of money. This is great news indeed since the rest of the world doesn't care about the US, so that means no terrorist will want to bomb the US for exporting its aweful consumerist culture.

  52. That's cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Reading the quotes from the gentleman making the decision makes me think of those Indian Guru relaxation tapes...

    "First of all, breathe in... then, release all the tension in your buttocks..."

    Replacing M$ products with Linux is like that tension release.

    1. Re:That's cool... by MullerMn · · Score: 2

      And releasing something through your buttocks is much like the development process that produces MS software.

      What a beautiful symmetry.

  53. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by Soko · · Score: 5, Insightful

    WINE doesn't run CS, Starcraft, UT, and all the other online games that make third-world cyber cafes profitable.

    Though some of the official stuff, as well as the more family-oriented shops may change to Linux, the vast majority of cyber cafes will still be running pirated games under a pirated Windows.


    I doubt it- this is a government sponsored program - they plainly can't allow pirated software for a host of reasons. If it were for-profit shops, I'd agree with you whole heartedly. The effort here is for education of the poor, not profits.

    India will continue to pirate as long as Microsoft leads everywhere else, though having the governor officially reject capitalism is a good step for socialism.

    Hunh? This quote:

    "For us it is not a question of Microsoft versus Linux. It is just a matter of choosing between a free software and a monopoly. We feel that when we are putting public information out in the open, then it should not be through a proprietary software."

    says they reject capitaism for socialism? That sounds very much like an informed, reasoned choice to me. It also will get the poor of India used to the idea of properly licensed software - and may end up curtailing some of the piracy you speak of.

    You sound as though you've pre-judged India as a country with no morals, self respect or smarts, since they have no money. I can assure you that this is definately not the case, especially in the smarts department. Educate yourself on what you speak of, please, especially before you attepmt to make such blanket statements.

    As it is, IMHO you definately put the ass in assume.

    Soko

    --
    "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
  54. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by NoodleSlayer · · Score: 3, Informative
    StarCraft was one of the first games to get working under WINE before WineX. There is a LINUX NATIVE version of both UT and UT2003 (I have both), and I've heard favorable reports to getting CS working under WINE, however the anti-cheating software doesn't work too well in WINE. Take a good look at Transgaming, there's a number of games on that list that do work under linux.

    However this really is a moot point. The goal of the rural cyberecafes is to provide access to email and web browsing, not to train a generation of "uber1337" kiddies that can't do anything but cheat in CS.

    And eveidently you don't understand what capitalist system is. If it was a socailist system there would be no choice, its one-service-for-all, kind of like how Microsoft wants it, that for every PC you have you have to pay the "Microsoft Tax". Linux is the one trying to break this up so there actually is competition in the x86 PC market.

    ~noodle

  55. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by Svet-Am · · Score: 1

    Have you read the EULA's for these games? I used to be an admin at a cybercafe where we wanted to host tournaments for these games. Our research turned up that the EULA's for these games (espescially the Blizzard titles) specifically prohibits their use in a cybercafe or other money-making venture. Just FYI and my $.02

    --
    [move .sig! for great justice, take off every .sig!]
  56. I thought Indiana State used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a cluster of Amigas

    1. Re:I thought Indiana State used by Havokmon · · Score: 2
      a cluster of Amigas

      Hence, IUPUI.

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  57. Re:Let the racist comments begin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I made the comment. I'm an American born Indian.

  58. Re: or as nelson so eloquently puts it..... by jerkyjunkmail · · Score: 1

    the words of Nelson:

    ah ha!

    --

    --
    What is pirate software? Software for inventory of stolen treasure?
  59. Re:At least someone is making a stand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, you believe that quote? They like it 'cause it's free, like beer.

  60. Re:Sweet! Less money for the U.S. and its citizens by McNihil · · Score: 0

    Less money to people who have invested in Microsoft not for Joe American who couldn't care less about them.

  61. Re: Troll URL by tomhudson · · Score: 2

    The above URL is a redirect elsewhere. Mouse over it to see what I mean. F$cking troll!

  62. Some advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    When some mentions Linux and Socialism in a post, it is a troll.

    1. Re:Some advice by fitten · · Score: 1

      So.... when Linux and Microsoft switch positions and Linux is on 95% of the boxes... what do we do to break up that OS monopoly?

    2. Re:Some advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We will use NetBSD, of course!

      (If you want to get ahead of the curve, you can use it today)

  63. Re:Sweet! Less money for the U.S. and its citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You ignorant fucking troll. Are you upset when the Mafia gets busted too? After all, they generate lots of revenue and all their 'front' ops generate lots of taxes...

  64. India Switched To Linux by tacoboks · · Score: 1

    Hey thats cool...... btw how do you say "Windoze sucks, Linux rulez" in Urdu/Hinid :--D

    "Im picking my brain because my nose is too easy"

    1. Re:India Switched To Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      windows murdabad , linux zindabad

      would be a good translation.

  65. This is bull .... by cyberjessy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The last week reading slashdot will convince u India is majorly into Linux. *Being and Indian* lemme tell you, this isnt happening here.

    The main reason is
    1. Piracy is rampant here. Ms Win costs Rs.0($0)
    2. Both being free, Windows is easier to use.
    3. Tools(MS VStudio) is also free.

    All the stories u see in slashdot are exxagerated.
    95% of developers in India target MS Win.

    thats it. simple.

    --
    Life is just a conviction.
    1. Re:This is bull .... by currentdirectory · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is not entirely true. IAAI (I am an indian). It is true that privacy is rampant among small software companies and large number of individuals. Why will a state govt. do something illegal? Big indian companies and some selected schools would never use pirated software.

    2. Re:This is bull .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... Ms Win and Ms Lose are both $0? Good. Send them to my bedroom after nine. Ah-soh!

    3. Re:This is bull .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bull ...

      Do u have any corroboration for 1 and 3?

      How about 2?

      Are you speaking from a personal standpoint or a professional standpoint?

      Any ordinary Ram Gandhi does *not* pirate OS or tools. If the seller of his computer gave him an unlicensed copy, it is another story.

      The fact is: the guy on the street does not make the decision or the big numbers in the balance sheet of MS. It is big orgs (and govts) that do this.

      Posting anonymous: since I do not want my other moderations to go to waste.

      I *am* replying and not modding down. Gimme points dammit :-)

      Sanga

    4. Re:This is bull .... by 0x0d0a · · Score: 3, Interesting

      First Linux came out... ...and they said it didn't matter.

      Then it got faster than Windows... ...and they said it didn't matter.

      Then it turned into a more secure server than Windows... ...and they said it didn't matter.

      Then it got thousands of developers working on desktop software for it... ...and they said it didn't matter.

      Then Gartner Group said "move from MS to it"... ...and they said it didn't matter.

      Then all the big iron vendors started supporting it... ...and they said it didn't matter.

      Then client companies started moving their servers over to it... ...and they said it didn't matter.

      Then state and national governments started switching to it by the handful... ...and they said it didn't matter.

      It's grown faster in popularity than any other OS... ...and they said it didn't matter.

      What does it take?

    5. Re:This is bull .... by Hugonz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is the government.Specially with the govt. MS Windows is NOT Rs.0 (or Mexican Pesos $0, for that matter) They DO have to pay the licensing. I can see it because I live in Mexico.

    6. Re:This is bull .... by metalmaniac1759 · · Score: 1

      Well, this reminds me of an MS .Net presentation we had in our Universtity last week. The speaker was talking about XML and Web Services as though MS had invented it. And was going on ranting and raving about Open Standards. And the misleading names they give to their products. The developer platform names end with a .Net and the Web services also end with a .Net When asked, it took him a full 5 minutes to accept that the two were unrelated and that any XML aware software could in fact access .Net services (in theory) and that VS.Net (or similar) stuff was not needed.
      My point is that they have started targetting developers here in India. They cannot get much out of sales cuz almost everyone uses pirated stuff. But there is one huge developer base in this country - a potential which they wouldn't want to lose upon.
      And then there was standard FUDs about .Net & Java.
      All in all, it was excellent marketing, and I am sure almost all the students must've thought what a great platform MS is!!

    7. Re:This is bull .... by Cyno · · Score: 1

      So... what yer saying is India is nothing more than a country full of criminals and pirates. Hey Dubya, quick, look over here. Another country of terrorists and pirates to bombing to protect our economy from the communists. Yep, simple.

    8. Re:This is bull .... by marauder404 · · Score: 2

      It's going to take an entry in to the desktop market. Recent reports STILL put Linux on the desktop at less than 1% market share, sometimes as low as 0.2-0.3%. If Linux is to succeed and become significant, it needs to be a score on the desktop market. At least as large as Macintosh. If you can find any recent, credible articles reflecting desktop marketshare, I'd love to read them.

    9. Re:This is bull .... by Bruce+Losis · · Score: 1

      The last week reading slashdot will convince u India is majorly into Linux. *Being and Indian* lemme tell you, this isnt happening here.

      The main reason is
      1. Piracy is rampant here. Ms Win costs Rs.0($0)
      2. Both being free, Windows is easier to use.
      3. Tools(MS VStudio) is also free.

      I'd go along with this. Some years ago I worked voluntarily in Nepal helping an NGO get its IT infrastructure together and useful. After a while, noticing the extreme level of piracy I asked the boss about it. His answer, "What can thay take away from us? We are one of the 25 poorest countries in the world."

      --
      Don't believe the nonsense, unless you hear it from me directly.
    10. Re:This is bull .... by istartedi · · Score: 2

      It sounds to me like not only MS, but a lot of other big corporations (drug companies come to mind) need to price appropriately for foreign markets. This is especially true for something like software, where you could set up a CD printing plant in India and make CDs for almost nothing a piece. That would help grow the Indian economy, and eventually MS would be able to charge a higher price for the Indian version. Instead, by pricing it at the ridiculously high US level, they've make piracy socially acceptable.

      A much milder example of this occurs here in the US, where high cigarette taxes have got ordinary people violating the law by mail-ordering from Indian (Native American) reservations or low-tax states. I live in Virginia, which probably has the lowest cig tax, and crooks load up minivans with cigs here and truck them to New York. The New York tax is so high that they just created a way for criminals (some have speculated that this includes terrorists) to raise money.

      In other words, if a tax on anything is too high, people will just refuse to pay the tax and factor in the penalty when caught as a "cost of business". In the case of Windows, the likelyhood of getting caught is nil for most Indians, and the tax is a year's average pay! Whooowee! If Windows cost $34,000 (isn't that the US median income?) I'd have only one thing to say:

      Aaarh, Matey.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    11. Re:This is bull .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And soon it will have taken over the lead. And we'll say that doesn't matter... Of course, _they_ will be licking their wounds.

    12. Re:This is bull .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your typo is something I must use at some point.

      It just sounds so meaningful yet absurd, "privacy is rampant".

    13. Re:This is bull .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When, exactly, was Linux slower or less secure than Windows?

      Ok, I understand that you're talking about publicity in the first few points, rather than functionality.

      In reality, when Linux came out, I don't think anyone considered it an alternative to Windows. When it first showed up it was an "alternative" to Minix. Later, as it gained more functionality, it became an alternative to the then slowly moving 386 BSD. Because of legal issues with Net/2, among other things, it then gained popularity faster than the 386 BSD splinter groups FreeBSD and NetBSD.

      Only later did it gain interest and publicity among people outside of those who already knew Unix and wanted a free one to run at home, which is perhaps at which point you could say "First, someone mentioned Linux... ...and they said it didn't matter."

    14. Re:This is bull .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd estimate Linux at more like 3% of the desktop. All those 0-1% figures I've seen are based on idiotic metrics like "Linux boxed-set Sales". It's free to copy, people! Your marketroid sales surveys don't make sense!

  66. News from the Indian Times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the other news:

    The Indian IT took receives a grant of 400 million dollars from MS and are now working on bulding a Linux Super Server and J2EE app server.

  67. What about us? by SLASHAttitude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why can't the US make such a switch? I know they have a lot invested in there M$ stuff right now but why could they not change. I think this comes down to people that run the software. We all know that politicians and a lot of people in government jobs are lazy and just there for the money or power. That is what I think is holding us back. Not to mention the lusers we have running things. They could never figure out why they can not get those .vbs files to work and not having to reboot every day.

    1. Re:What about us? by xenoweeno · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why can't the US make such a switch?

      Such a move would knock the wind out of Microsoft's stock value overnight, which would in turn be bad for the U.S. economy. There are other economic effects that would follow, to be sure. It would be a shot in America's own foot.

      So, in short, it's because using Microsoft software keeps Am-uuurrr-ka strong. *cough*

    2. Re:What about us? by Quill_28 · · Score: 2

      Oh I don't know because maybe it would cost millions to switch? Why do you think so many companies and colleges still use a system from the 80's.
      Because of all the retraining that would be neccessary. Because of the apps that wouldn't work. I could go on.

      The real question is why don't new projects use linux, freebsd, etc

    3. Re:What about us? by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 2

      "Why can't the US make such a switch?"

      Before you demand a country to make a switch, why not ask your friendly slashdot users? As much as this site is pro-(Linux|MAC|*NIX|BeOS), there are a significant number of Windows users(according to the recent windows poll even though "thou shalt not use poll to due anything serious").

      Now if you can't get your slash buddies to convert, how the hell are you going to get the gov't, companies, organization, etc. to convert? I mean you can go from step 1 to step 4, without doing steps 2 and 3.

      (no profit jokes, please)

    4. Re:What about us? by vinsci · · Score: 2
      Now if you can't get your slash buddies to convert
      Actually, Slashdot readers are switching to Linux in very large numbers: see the simple proof in this comment.
      --

      Trusted Computing FAQ | Free Dawit Isaak!
  68. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by tomhudson · · Score: 2
    For simple things like getting info on web, web based email, and simple chatting, no difference between linux and windows.</quote>

    Differences:

    1. BSOD's
    2. Viruses
    3. licen$e co$t$
    But, yeah, I see your point. Too bad that more people in North America don't realize this.
  69. From Linux to Windoze? by binaryDigit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just out of curiosity, we hear a lot about people migrating from various solutions over to Linux, but I don't hear much about people doing the reverse. Is this because this just isn't happening (doubt it) or that it's just not publicised? If it does occur, I think it would benefit the community greatly to feature them even more so than those who switch TO Linux. I think the reason is obvious, if someone is switching away, then there is something to be learned. It may be features, it may be economics, or it may even be politics, but I think that we would learn from these turncoa^h^h^h uh, people.

    1. Re:From Linux to Windoze? by distributed.karma · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It if actually were happening, don't you think there would be lots and lots of publicity put forward by M$ -- just like the Mac converts stories.

      I simply find it hard to imagine thar organizations would convert from Win to Lin. In this Win-centric world, those who choose open source (either conversion or start up) are likely to have weighed the options quite carefully.

      --

      --
      If you moderate this, then your children will be next.

    2. Re:From Linux to Windoze? by Kwil · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't happen.

      But the reason is simply because Windows is currently the "default" position.

      Therefore, the only way someone can really switch from Linux to Windows is if they've already switched the other way.

      But if somebody does this, it's not really thought of as "switching" but more of "I tried it and couldn't get my games/winmodem/word documents/something to work, so I just kept Windows."

      So basically, it's a failed Windows to Linux switch, not a Linux to Windows switch.

      --

      That Jesus Christ guy is getting some terrible lag... it took him 3 days to respawn! -NJ CoolBreeze

    3. Re:From Linux to Windoze? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've moved from Linux to XP. No problems to report. XP is a bit more stable than Linux for my research code.

    4. Re:From Linux to Windoze? by infiniti99 · · Score: 2

      You mean like this ?

      Interestingly, this is the 11th most active Slashdot story ever. It was only recently bumped off of the top 10 hall of fame, because of the US/MiddleEast events lately.

    5. Re:From Linux to Windoze? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are a lot of people who don't exclusively use one system, or who switch back and forth depending on what they need to use etc. How do you classify dual-booters?

      As for myself, since I have never used Windows as my primary OS, I can say that it is certainly possible for a situation to arise that might produce a switcher to Windows. Of course I wouldn't be a switcher from Linux, I've only ever used Linux as my primary desktop OS for a short time (that was a failed FreeBSD to Linux switch attempt).

  70. Re:Sweet! Less money for the U.S. and its citizens by 1000101 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Mafia == Microsoft nice one. i don't think microsoft goes around shooting cops and other people. and besides the whole monopoly thing (which was handled by the courts) how else does microsoft resemble the mob? that's the most idiotic comparison i've ever seen

  71. they are only trying to save some money...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's because they only want someting that is free, it's nothing to do about microsoft being a monopoly. I bet you India has one of the largest pirated microsoft software install bases in Asia (outside of china)

    It's not good enought that companies are shipping over massive amounts of their workforce over to India. What will happen in 2 years time when the whole workforce is Linux savvy?

    Do you think you will stand much of a chance doing linux administration when someone in Deli can do it for $5 an hour? and they work weekends / public holidays?

  72. Thank Digvijay for his efforts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Like many of you, I am very pleased with this announcement - a big step forward for open source in India! Maybe others will agree - I just sent him an email thanking him for his decision. His contact info is below (remove SPAM).

    Shri Digvijay Singh
    Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh
    Vallabh Bhavan
    Madhya Pradesh

    cm@SPAMmpchiefminister.com OR cs@SPAMvallabh.mp.nic.in

    1. Re:Thank Digvijay for his efforts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!

      DO NOT DO THAT!!!?

      Are you mad!? Do you really want to /. his mail server?!?!?

      Send him a post card instead! No wait... haaaa...

      Sig: I like monkeys. Monkeys eat bananas! I don't like bananas!

  73. In other news... by Kombat · · Score: 0, Troll

    Wow, one little obscure region that no one's ever heard of, in a country on the other side of the world (not to mention poverty line), switched too Linux. Woot.

    And in other news, another 238 states embraced Microsoft products in their civil offices today.

    --
    Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
  74. Re:Sweet! Less money for the U.S. and its citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS - a large organization accused and found guilty of illegal activities
    Mafia - a large organization accused and found guilty of illegal activities

    Seems a pretty valid comparison to me.

  75. Re:Awright! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thank you! please come again!

  76. Article Title Should Be: by norweigiantroll · · Score: 1

    Freedom Triumphs Over Microsoft Freebies!

  77. Re:At least someone is making a stand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    1 Switch to linux
    2 ???
    3 PROFIT!!!

  78. Gyandoot is still a Microsoft project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    Please read the article before jumping for joy. Only one of the two state government programs are switching to linux (the Headstart program). The other, Gyandoot, seems to be a Microsoft project.

    See also this for a little more about Gyandoot and MS involvement.

    Prakash

  79. Re:Sweet! Less money for the U.S. and its citizens by 1000101 · · Score: 1

    ha! you really are stupid. those "illegal activities" you mention. well, they aren't exactly the same thing. mafia - murder, tax evasion, liquor and tabacco smuggling, narcotics ms - monopolistic practices

  80. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by hawkfish · · Score: 1
    He did NOT reject capitalism, it was the freedom he didn't want to give up. Thats a very big difference.

    Indeed! Freedom != capitalism.
    --
    You will not drink with us, but you would taste our steel? - Walter Matthau, The Pirates
  81. netcraft says... by jackstack · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The site www.mp.nic.in is running Microsoft-IIS/4.0 on NT4/Windows 98.

    1. Re:netcraft says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and now that you've advertised that fact, it will suborned in 2 minutes!

    2. Re:netcraft says... by jackstack · · Score: 1

      riigght.... what does 'suborned' mean?

    3. Re:netcraft says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Hmm... lemme see... hold on.. there! I 0wn0r j00, mr Indian! ;-)

      Don't look at me like that. I'm only giving them a reason not to change their mind...

    4. Re:netcraft says... by blauerdrachen · · Score: 1

      Actually as of today (20 Nov 2002) they have switched to Windows 2000 on IIS/5.0. So much for Linux, huh?

      http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=www.mp. ni c.in&submit=Examine

      --
      My God...it's full of stars!
  82. de didn't say that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "India is hardly a 'small 3rd world country'."

    He said nothing of the kind. He said (emphasis mine):

    " but then again, they'll just take over -[another]- small 3rd world country."

  83. UT on Linux. by MsGeek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't know about CounterStrike or Starcraft, but there is an Unreal Tournament installer which will install the Windows UT "Game Of The Year" edition onto Linux. Loki Software wrote it. And UT2003 comes as a hybrid disk with both the Linux and the Windows installs. So that crosses a couple of games off your list. BTW this also works with FreeBSD using the Linux compatibility layer.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  84. Re: Troll URL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You looked at Goatse!
    You looked at Goatse!
    Neener Neener Neener!
    You looked at Goatse!

  85. Re:Didn't see that coming. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course it was Michael that smacked you down. I didn't even have to look at what editor posted the story to know.

    "Hi, I'm Michael Simms. I'm a communist idiot that likes to censor people. It gives me wood."

    If I ever saw that idiot in public I would smack the shit out of him.

  86. Days of the past. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The world now hinges upon a global economy. In the IT industry, work is constantly outsourced to India with varying degrees of success.

    India is an up and coming tech juggernaut, much like China. US corporations would do well to take note of that. In the modern business, words such as 'cheap' and 'foreign' haven't the place they used to.

    Cheap? How so? Are they saving money? are their productivity and profits up? Cheap? Cheap is good!

    Foreign? See global economy.

    Businesses must start looking ahead in this brave new world. If they don't, well.. ..I suppose they could always team up with the **AA and attempt to legislate themselves into continued existance. :P

  87. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by ratamacue · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes. The notion of government "rejecting capitalism" implies exactly two requirements: (1) to increase the power and expense of government, and (2) to reduce the freedom of the people. Neither one of these requirements has been met with this new proposal, as far as I can see. The individual who made that quote simply does not understand the concepts of capitalism and socialism.

    Capitalism is freedom -- specifically, the freedom to engage in voluntary association. Socialism is the exact opposite of this. Socialism is essentially a prohibition of capitalism, because it requires that your freedom of voluntary association be eliminated (or reduced) by the force of government.

  88. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by Archie+Steel · · Score: 2

    CS runs very well under WineX (I play regularly), and so does StarCraft. Unreal Tournament (and UT2003) has a native linux version.

    Also, the thing most popular in indian cybercafes is not games, but e-mail.

    --

    Reminder: find a new sig
  89. Re:Didn't see that coming. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God forbid that we don't get at least one circle jerk a day because some nomad in Chad is switching to Linux.

  90. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by MrResistor · · Score: 2

    Two things:

    1) You're an idiot

    2) You don't know what the hell you're talking about

    Let me explain:

    Counter-Strike and StarCraft both run just fine under WINE, and have done so for years (I personally know people who were playing CS under Wine over 2 years ago). Unreal Tournament doesn't need to run on WINE since both UT and UT2003 have native support for Linux (Although, for the record, I know people who were playing UT under WINE, again, over 2 years ago).

    Since this is easily verifiable fact, it is quite clear that you don't know what the hell you're talking about.

    having the governor officially reject capitalism is a good step for socialism.

    While this statement is technically true, it has absolutely nothing to do with the situation at hand. The issue is not one of Capitalism v. Socialism, but rather one of government accountability and transparancy. These two issues are completely different and distinct, and only an idiot who doesn't know what the hell they're talking about would get them confused.

    Though some of the official stuff, as well as the more family-oriented shops may change to Linux, the vast majority of cyber cafes will still be running pirated games under a pirated Windows.

    That may be true in the large cities, which actually have economies which are able to support privately owned cybercafes, but India is a very big place, and the vast majority of it does not fit that description.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  91. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 1

    I thought the point behind capitalism is that the best product/service wins, without any help from having an illegal monopoly?
    Actually, capitalism is an ownership model, not a market model. Its defining characteristic is private ownership of production. This can just as easily mean state granted monopolies, as in the fascist model, as as it can free markets. Likewise, socialism does not preclude free markets. American Individualist Anarchist Benjamin Tucker's ideology is an example of market socialism.

    That said you are correct that the original poster's assertion that free software is somehow socialist and proprietary software capitalist is unfounded.
    --
    It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

    -James Baldwin
  92. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Freedom != capitalism

    Let me guess asswipe, you're still in college.

  93. _Indian State_ not _India_ by MHV · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm just amazed at how much people are getting this wrong. It is not the WHOLE of India that decided to switch to GNU/Linux, but only the state of Madhya Pradesh. Guys, what would you have said if the headline was the American state of Arkansas, has opted to switch to Linux from Microsoft

    In case you didn't know, Bhopal has been the site of the world's worst chemical disaster in 1984. A leak from the Union Carbide (an american company) nearby plant has killed and injured thousands of citizens, and the company has denied responsibility for a long time. See here for more info. Somehow, I'm not surprised that they want to avoid the presence of big american companies

    Just my two maple-leaved cents

    1. Re:_Indian State_ not _India_ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC tens of thousands died in the disaster in Bhopal and something like half a million were injured.

      In any case, it was probably one of the worst single non-natural events in recorded history, the only more destructive event I can think of is the use of a nuclear bomb...

  94. Re:Awright! by Tassach · · Score: 2
    Thats why cows are sacred to Hindus... not because of some strange religious edict or a prejudice against beef, but because cattle seen as a higher, more enlightened life form than humans
    It's been a long time since I took a comparative religion class, but that doesn't correspond to what I remember. To simplify greatly: if you generate positive Karma in this life, your next incarnation will be at a higher level; negative karma and you'll come back lower. Animals are lower on the Karmic ladder than humans. The reason you don't eat a cow is that it might have been Grandma in it's previous life.
    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  95. Re: Troll URL by tomhudson · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    You looked at Goatse! You looked at Goatse! Neener Neener Neener! You looked at Goatse! </quote>

    No, I didn't.

    I'm not stupid enough to click on a URL posted by an AC with NC (no clue)

    But, sure, I'll play with the ugly little AC trolls like you once in a while. Someone has to. It's fun. And your posting style makes me smile :-)

  96. Re:Awright! by Doomrat · · Score: 1

    Yeah! Indian people! That's funny!

  97. Maybe it's me, but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It is just a matter of choosing between a free software and a monopoly.

    Seems to me that if Linux is a valid choice to accomplish their goal... then Microsoft doesn't exactly have a monopoly.

  98. Damn another by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    Are there not people who are just happy with what they have? I mean I must believe there are computer scientists out there with bigger problems to solve than which OS they want to run today...

    Its cool and all that Linux exists but its still far from being the be-all of desktop computing. Until the OSS developers realize that "perdy UIs" are not just wussy-Windows stuff Linux won't be as mainstream as it should.

    I mean for instance, to install a patch I shouldn't have any knowledge of the basics more than download this and double click. While RPM's are getting there I've seen quite a few that konk out due to dependency failures.

    At least with windows the "Windows Update" thingy doesn't cause such problems.

    In otherwords Linux distro's have to be designed for users not developers.

    (/rant)

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:Damn another by mao+che+minh · · Score: 2

      I take it that you never used either Mandrake, Suse, or Red Hat's automatic software update utilities? Red Hat network? apt-get for Debian? Linux?

    2. Re:Damn another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean for instance, to install a patch I shouldn't have any knowledge of the basics more than download this and double click.

      Yes, you should require more knowledge than download this and double click in order to install a patch. Otherwise, how will you know what is being done to your system?

      btw: do all of those recipients listed in your address book like receiving multiple emails regarding nude photos from you everyday? I ask because of your tendency to doubleclick everything that comes your way.

  99. Re:Let the racist comments begin... by GLX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ok, I'll bite.

    I just read the Ask Slashdot you referred to at -1 (I missed it the first time around...) and don't find any "racist" comments whatsoever.

    All I see is a few posts from people griping about H1B Visa workers. While you may have assumed (incorrectly) that all H1B Visa holders come from India (I'm presuming that's why you posted the comment in this story), plenty come from countries such as England, Russia and the Asia-Pac Rim. No one specifically mentioned any race, creed, or religion in any demeaning term.

    People are obviously upset about the proliferation of H1B workers in America. It wouldn't have made it to Congress and the mainstream media if there wasn't widespread sentiment about it.

    There's a difference between racism and criticism, and I think you need to be a little less defensive unless you feel guilty of something yourself.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  100. Good move for them.... by 95_gst_al · · Score: 1

    They are taking on programming jobs from the US, and now they are switching to Linux OS. By ditching the Windows OS they are saving tons of money. Looks like they are boosting their economy with all these changes. I think it is a smart move.

    --
    When all else fails, piss on it. At least you will feel better in some kind of way.
    1. Re:Good move for them.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How are they "boosting their economy" by having a couple of small-scale government agencies run their IT on Linux? India is a third-world country, and using Linux is not going to resolve that! They still need to rectify their human rights abuses, produce clean water, and get their population problem under control. Your assertion is just dumb.

      Linux doesn't cure cancer! I know that is like hearing that there is no Santa Claus, but the truth is that Linux is an implementation of UNIX, isn't inherently better than XP, and has a religious following. I get real work done in XP and I get real work done in Linux. It's not a freaking silver bullet!

    2. Re:Good move for them.... by 95_gst_al · · Score: 1

      They are saving money from dropping the Windows software! They can use old a$$ computers and they dont have to worry about software purchases/licenses.

      --
      When all else fails, piss on it. At least you will feel better in some kind of way.
  101. Re:Awright! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But if the cow was Grandma, then she lost karma. Therefore, doesn't she deserve getting eaten? I mean, it's only fair justice.

  102. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by mla_anderson · · Score: 1

    CS does indeed run under Wine.

    --
    Sig is on vacation
  103. A positive thing by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't forget that a recent poll showed that 50% of /.ers run an MS OS (myself included). They really do have a target audience here.

    Actually, that's a very positive thing. Consider that of the number of new readers coming in, far more than 50% would be long-time windows users. So what does the 50% figure tell you? Right. Tens of thousands of switchers.

    In fact, that 50% number is just about optimum. It means we're not just preaching to the choir, we're actually doing some work. So what you see at Slashdot is not only exponential growth in readers (yes it is, check the id numbers) but exponential growth in the number of switchers as well.

    --
    Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    1. Re:A positive thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and how many of those so called MS users
      are actually running IE on codeweavers crossover?

  104. Re:Didn't see that coming. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah right, normally its just someone who might/could possibly switch one day in the future, if the weather is right and the hamster ball is spinning sweetly.

  105. who cares? by hevyd · · Score: 0, Troll

    Is this supposed to be news? This obviously shows how desperate the linux community is to brag about something as useless as this. -- lets all report every time some amazon tribe uses toilet paper instead of a leaf to wipe his ass!

    1. Re:who cares? by nagora · · Score: 3, Interesting
      This obviously shows how desperate the linux community is to brag about something as useless as this. -- lets all report every time some amazon tribe uses toilet paper instead of a leaf to wipe his ass!

      Yes, a representative of the govenment of the single largest country on Earth is of no importance or interest. That he is acting in opposition to half a billion dollars of bribes distributed by Gates in person doesn't make it news and the possibility that this will undermine the Microsoft hegemony in every developing country in the world and may even impact the EU's attitude to free software is never going to matter to the readers of /. Or perhaps you need to look outside your own window once in a while.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  106. Xandros Linux runs MS Office just fine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft's main advantage seems to be its pervasiveness and it ability to run Office. Even if Office is the best productivity suite available, is it so much better that it is worth the extra cost of the software and the O/S needed to run it?

    Xandros Linux runs MS Offfice just fine. But it does cost $100 per seat too, for it's integrated Codeweavers component.

  107. India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    What I don't get about India is this: Indian workers can beat the crap out of American workers. Software creation does not require a significant amount of capital, despite what some dot-commer may have told you. So: why doesn't Indian software industry just crush American software industry? Why is India trying to play along with Microsoft at all, instead of just beating the living shit out of them in a fair market?

    Oh, because there's no fair market. Never mind.

    1. Re:India by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

      Premise:

      Indian workers are much better than American workers.

      Conclusion:

      India should beat the crap out of America in software development.

      Actuality:

      America outsources a percentage of it's development work to India, but American is still by far the world leader in software development.

      Reason: (my opinion)

      India has never been able to implement anything like a market economy. Rather it struggles with the largest and most inefficient form of socialism imaginable. Time and again efforts to make India into a modern economy have foundered on the shoals of the world's largest, most corrupt bureaucracy.

      http://www.vedamsbooks.com/no18921.htm
      http://w ww.vedamsbooks.com/no18921.htm
      http://www.aegis.c om/news/ads/1994/AD942153.html
      http://www.aegis.c om/news/ads/1994/AD942153.html

  108. Re:Awright! by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2

    but don't forget that 'real' karma is the unmeasurable enlightenment you have acheived.


    That's right.... It once was said:

    "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos", - Homer Simpson

  109. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by gl4ss · · Score: 2

    you forgot the re-installs after customers clicked some fancy url sent by their 'friend' and erased the hd.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  110. Six weeks, tops... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Six weeks tops before they are forced to switch back because of security and compatiblity issues. Eight on the outside. And that is one unemployeed Indian. Wow... how dumb do you have to be... that data network system in India will choke if they throw a sub-net of linux into an otherwise stable and effective system... lord knows it nearly bancrupted us last year.

  111. Re:Let the racist comments begin... by frankthechicken · · Score: 1

    I wonder if it can be considered racist that you feel the only people to read slash-dot are white, middle-class Americans?

  112. Re: or as nelson so eloquently puts it..... by azzy · · Score: 1

    or as Nelson put it:

    Where's my bloody arm got to? Eeek.. my eye fell out!

  113. Wobbly Wheels by 9jack9 · · Score: 1

    I just want them to fix those wobbly wheels.

  114. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by slide-rule · · Score: 1

    Wine in fact does run Starcraft.

    Not only DOES wine run starcraft, but for the box(en) I have available, windows does NOT run starcraft where I can actually play it. Linux/wine had no problems. I found that rather funny.

  115. Almost spat out my water. by invenustus · · Score: 1

    I hope this gets modded up funny. If I came up with anything that funny, I wouldn't post it AC....

    --
    grep -ri 'should work' /usr/src/linux | wc -l
  116. Correction by distributed.karma · · Score: 3, Informative

    CmdrTypo strikes again. It should of course read ".. convert from Lin to Win".

    --

    --
    If you moderate this, then your children will be next.

  117. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

    Runs more smoothly in WINE than the last version of Windows I had installed, NT 4.

  118. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Capitalism is freedom -- specifically, the freedom to engage in voluntary association.

    Only to the extent that the distribution of property is voluntarily agreed to. Once you invoke force to preserve allocations of property, the voluntary part goes out the window.

    A propertarian economic system requires a strong state to enforce property (read: power) relationships. Look at history: every time the poor people get uppity, the rich install an authoritarian government. In some cases (Franco, Hitler), the rich are subjected to a bit more authority than they bargained for.

  119. That's Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's great to hear that a rather large university such at Indiana State decided to make the move to Linux. Hurrah!

  120. Re:Let the racist comments begin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to Jesse Jackson's dream world....where everything is racist and all of life's problems can be traced to racism.

  121. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me guess asswipe, you're still in college.

    Whereas you have a Dream Job where you dictate the terms of your labor?

    There's a reason that Dilbert resonates with office drones everywhere.

    And next time you go shopping at WalMart, remember those free Chinese who manufactured the goods you are purchasing.

  122. Re:Awright! by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
    While I make no pretense about my love of beef in the grilled-to-a-juicy-medium-rare sense, you have to admit that cows do more for the environment we do on an invidual basis (entire herds and livestock yards can be pretty polluting and are responsible for a lot of C02 emission, tho) and with remarkably fewer cares than a human.

    They do more for providing me lunch, for certain, but they don't do all that much for the environment. Sure, they wander around shitting, but that really don't impress me much.

    The only reason cows haven't put up an immense operation to raise and slaughter various wild grasses is that they lack opposable thumbs.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  123. Re:Awright! by chrylis · · Score: 1

    It once was said: "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos"

    That was before Slashdot.

  124. your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.

    And in anarchism we will finally be free.

  125. This is quite the quote.. by jonnythan · · Score: 2
    is just a matter of choosing between a free software and a monopoly.

    Is it me, or does it seem that if you have a real *choice*, then there is no monopoly?

    I thought the essence of a monopoly was that there was no viable choice to be made.

    1. Re:This is quite the quote.. by adb · · Score: 2

      Yes. Microsoft has a monopoly in the US, because they have saturated the market with their software. Note that I mean saturated in the technical sense, not just the "heavy marketing" sense: relatively few new users enter the computing scene here, so any alternative has to convince people to switch. Microsoft then makes unviable by a variety of means: incompatible file formats and APIs, a huge proliferation of Windows-only proprietary software that people are locked into, and so on.

      In India, there is a huge market that is not yet saturated. If they chose Microsoft, they would likely be choosing to create a monopoly just like ours.

  126. The economics of free vs proprietary software.. by theprancinghorse · · Score: 3, Informative

    I came across this excellent article in an Indian business newspaper discussing the economics behind the use of free software vs proprietary software in developing countries like India. It also touches upon the adoption of Linux in Madhya Pradesh. In a nutshell, the article presents a strong argument in favour of free software mainly from the economic standpoint.

    1. Re:The economics of free vs proprietary software.. by Tony-A · · Score: 2

      Good read.
      "Our software industry has so far been doing simple applications work. Working with free software gives our industry the opportunity of jumping to the next level of complexity. It would give domestic competence and control over the heart of our computers."
      Linux may be cheaper, but more important, it's better. It's a matter of copetence, control, and trust. Trust? Yep. Because the source is open, it's much less likely to have any "funny business", and if there is any, somebody competent is likely to stumble onto it and start making noises.

  127. Re:Sweet! Less money for the U.S. and its citizens by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

    You know, that doesn't mean that the global standard of living improvements through improved efficiency won't make it worthwhile.

    You don't *have* to take foo from B and give it to A. You *can* get A and B to work together and improve *both* of their stations.

  128. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by tomhudson · · Score: 2

    Yeah, but that's just part of the Micro$oft tax, or a feature, or whatever... :-)

  129. Yeah! by usurper · · Score: 1

    First Gyandooth and then The World!

    Watch out Microsoft!!

  130. Ignorant People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Oh look at India", look how third rate it is. Who cares if they switch to linux. Well im 1/2 Indian damnit and not everyone is some poor farmer it is good they switched to linux, I mean thats like several million people more prone to use linux than MS. You should be happy and not make your little sarcastic jokes. :p

  131. A solution for developing countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    1. build a nuclear arsenal
    2. use all the commencial software and international patents you want without paying anything
    3. if an commercial embargo sets up, adopt linux and keep the use of patents
    4. if someone keeps complaining, bomb them
    5. when you get rich, enter the UN security council
    6. start selling amunition to every bizarre country in the world
    7. when some 'allies' get pissed off and explode your nice buildings, state a war against terrorism to "recover your economy"
    8. wait for the end of the world as we know it

    (except for the linux detail, adapted without authorization from the united states 'business case')

  132. Re:Sweet! Less money for the U.S. and its citizens by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

    a large organization accused and found guilty of illegal activities

    Same as Greenpeace? (lots of borderline ecoterrorism)
    How about the FBI? (Hoover's abuses in the '70s)

  133. Hysterical! by mekkab · · Score: 2

    Very funny...

    But to take you seriously for half a second:

    you wrote:
    But many corporations have been reluctant to switch to Linux due to its image as an OS used by outcasts, hippies, pirates, and hackers.

    Which is totally wrong. Every managers fisrt question is usually: "hmmm, this linux thing, does it run Outlook and Office? But more importantly, does it run AOL?"

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  134. netherlands by jilles · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here in the Netherlands, the left-wing green party yesterday also proposed embracing open source. In a quite extensive report on their website (http://www.groenlinks.nl/nieuws/4001428.html, in Dutch). They motivate the proposal quite well. There are a few minor details that they got wrong (most notably, Linus' last name is misspelled and the fact that a closed source format is used for the actual report) but overall the message is that closed source is bad and open source can be beneficial for both economical reasons and other reasons such as security, reliability and openness. Considering the report is written by a non technical person for a non technical audience, the effort should be applauded.

    With the upcoming election in January, I hope this will be one of the election themes.

    --

    Jilles
    1. Re:netherlands by weston · · Score: 2

      Europe's treatment of MS's place in the market is going to be particularly interesting. They don't have the same kind of political/economic interest in playing nice with MS that the U.S. might have, and a more centrist view prevails when it comes to market operation, so it won't lead as easily to "leave the market alone"/"you're just jealous of success" positions.

      But where things get especially interesting is considering how the EU is in the stage of becoming more of a unified and global power. Some commentators have likened the reforms going on there to the transition phase that the 13 original colonies went through... articles of confederation, then consitution... and anticipate an accelerated transition into a true block. As this block acquires more power, we may see more jockeying for power between the U.S. and th E.U. ... maybe everything from the sort of tariff tiffs that happened last year over steel, to looking at ways to improve their domestic advantage when it comes to software and I/T. Losing licensing costs for Windows and paying local companies for development may be one way to encourage that.

  135. Does this about sum it up? by riven1128 · · Score: 1

    Haiku!!

    Microsoft:
    "we cure your disease!"
    "then infect you with windows!"
    "now you write our code!"

    India:
    "Thanks for the money"
    "we will now run free linux"
    "kegger at my house!"

    1. Re:Does this about sum it up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about

      India
      "We're running Linux"
      "'cause it is free"
      "but the moment you leave"
      "We're switching back to Windows"
      "cause we can get all the warez"
      "for cheap to nearly free"
      "off of Kazaa"

  136. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One thing:

    YHBT! fucking moron!

    HAND

  137. I agree by mao+che+minh · · Score: 2
    I have been in constant communication with 3 developers in India over the past year. Until I sent one a Red Hat CD, none of them had ever even seen Linux. Oh sorry, GNU/Linux. Anyways, the favored OS with all three is Windows 2000.

    Now, the opinion of and exposure to one particular operating system by three guys in India isn't saying much, but when coupled with cyberjessy's statement, it's something.

  138. Re:This is bull ....Does it hurt when I do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What does it take?"

    PAIN!!

  139. clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Sorry, but HINDU is not a common religion in India, Hinduism is. A hindu is one who practices hinduism.

    Also, Karma is not enlightenment. In the strictest sense, karma just means destiny (also means action or deed), that's all.

  140. Premature by r_j_prahad · · Score: 2

    Do not be holding your breath for this to actually happen. There is still plenty of JET A-1 fuel at Sea-Tac for Mr. Bill's airplane.

    I hear he has a delicate stomach, I wonder how well he is tolerating Indian food?

  141. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who, thanks to capitalism, have jobs.

  142. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by fitten · · Score: 1

    1. I haven't seen a BSOD in over 2 years.
    2. Viruses will come to Linux as more and more Linux boxes come online. Windows has bugs but it is 90%+ of the computers out there. If you want to do something destructive or 'hackerish', you target what will get you the most bang for the buck. In fact, Linux/Un*x boxes are more security risks because of their great support for multiple users. You may get email viruses and have the machine format it's own harddrive but you won't get box hopping as well.
    3. With Windows, any user can keep it up to date (as up to date as Microsoft makes it) by clicking a button. You have to have someone who knows more than that to keep a Linux box up to date. License costs vs. having someone on staff to deal with it. Of course, 'net cafes worth anything will have someone on staff regardless of the OSs present.

  143. Please don't feed the trolls! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  144. Re:Even MORE cheap programmers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US IT workers are overpaid and underworked windows-dependents. I suppose it could be worse though. Tried working in australia? Ugh -- now there's !clue for you.

  145. Hitting too close to home by Kenneth+Stephen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Facts to keep in mind :

    Corruption is a way of life, especially if you are in the government. While corruption is not unknown in the US, these are usually exceptions (most law buying takes place over the table rather than under it and is thus not "corrupt" behaviour). In India, the honest politicians would be the exception. Odds are that someone in Karnataka did take a bribe.

    Madhya Pradesh is not one of the technologically advanced states. Karnataka (which has Bangalore) is - hence Bill Gates would naturally spend more money on Karnataka. Even if Madhya Pradesh chose to stick to WinXX, it is doubtful that it would constitute a good market for MS.

    All, in all, it does look like a bid in the poker game.

    --

    There is no such thing as luck. Luck is nothing but an absence of bad luck.

    1. Re:Hitting too close to home by Darby · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While corruption is not unknown in the US, these are usually exceptions

      You are deluding yourself if you think that this is even remotely true. Corruption is the absolute rule in our government. Explain DMCA, Patriot act, Mickey Mouse Protection act, Homeland Security (alone and with all the riders) in any other way.

      In India, the honest politicians would be the exception.

      Here we apparently had one left who is now dead.
      Wellstone was the one dissenter to the Patriot act.
      Anyone who voted in favor of that showed their hatred and contempt of the constitution, freedom, and basically everything America says that we stand for.
      If you disagree try and come up with an actual reason that I'm wrong.

      It's sad that you can have proof piled upon proof that the US government is completely owned and corrupt yet you are afraid to face the truth.
      I'm not singling you out. Most people in America are afraid of facing reality. That is out primary problem.

    2. Re:Hitting too close to home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paul 'vote me in once and I'll sock it to those Washington Insiders' Wellstone- the man who was LOSING his bid for a third term (yes, he wanted to serve for eighteen years and probably beyond!) was NOT a paragon of integrity. He was rather ordinary in his personal life (we all are- people like Bill Clinton are fortunately the exception).

      He's popular to deify right now, of course. Frankly, I wish he'd lived to see his defeat at the polls.

    3. Re:Hitting too close to home by Darby · · Score: 2

      He's popular to deify right now, of course. Frankly, I wish he'd lived to see his defeat at the polls.

      I didn't intend to deify him. I don't know that much about him professionally, and less personally.

      The fact that the act of voting in favor of the Patriot Act was, quite literally, an act of treason, and he's the only one that had the courage to vote no does justify offering some respect for his principles IMHO.

    4. Re:Hitting too close to home by nathanm · · Score: 2
      Corruption is the absolute rule in our government. Explain DMCA, Patriot act, Mickey Mouse Protection act, Homeland Security (alone and with all the riders) in any other way.
      You didn't read the post you're replying to very carefully. In fact, if you'd finish reading the rest of the sentence you quoted, you wouldn't need an explanation:
      (most law buying takes place over the table rather than under it and is thus not "corrupt" behaviour)
  146. Re: or as nelson so eloquently puts it..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what the hell are you talking about?

  147. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by ratamacue · · Score: 1
    Only to the extent that the distribution of property is voluntarily agreed to. Once you invoke force to preserve allocations of property, the voluntary part goes out the window.

    I agree 100%. Strong property rights are an essential element of capitalism.

  148. Re: or as nelson so eloquently puts it..... by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

    Ah ha! ? Isn't that Sherlock Holmes?

    Perhaps you meant HAAA...HAAAA !!!

    --
    Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
  149. Will they use 'apache' ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...or do the want to use a foreigner? ;)

  150. Re:Sweet! Less money for the U.S. and its citizens by thelexx · · Score: 2

    This is exactly the kind of thinking that is the root of the problems in the US business world today. Executives who think that since it's all just money or 'just business', breaking the law is OK. Wink, wink, nudge, nudge. This is not about a matter of degree. You are still a criminal regardless of whether you pickpocketed or murdered. You are still put in cuffs and toted downtown. The punishment is the only thing that varies. Spend time in prison, and you are an ex-con. Tax evasion or murder makes no difference.

    --
    "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
  151. Re:real clarification of karma by LaMuk · · Score: 1

    Karma is the law of cause and effect. AKA, you sow what you reap. The goal is not to have good karma or bad karma, but to not have karma. Only then can you break the cycle of birth death rebirth.

    I don't really know why cows are sacred to hindus accept that they make a better renewable resource if you don't kill them. Even their feces is used for fuel. The air in India cities pongs.

  152. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by paulproteus · · Score: 1

    The vast majority of OSS developers who do not "code OSS professionally" participate in a gift economy, a system where people compete for ethereal quantities like reputation.

    It works in OSS because reputation gives people jobs, money for speeches, and fame. And we know geeks like fame.

    --
    |/usr/games/fortune
  153. Well, CNN is not that credible source by santeri · · Score: 2, Informative
    And of course CNN [cnn.com] is well known for making things up.

    Well, they are. (Topic aside.)

    Example: check their coverage of the so called "Gulf War". Blatant lies and propaganda all-day-around.

    --
    ______________
    OTTERS RULE.
  154. WARNING!! GOATSEX LINK IN PARENT! by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

    yuck, not a pretty sight....

    --
    if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
  155. I thought the article said Indiana State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Switched to Linux.

  156. Duke says... by YardgnomeUT · · Score: 1

    ...suck it down Gates.

    --
    Negative, I am a meat popsicle.
  157. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by tomhudson · · Score: 2
    I haven't seen a BSOD in over 2 years. </quote>

    Nice to know you haven't seen a BSOD in over 2 years. I haven't either - on my boxes - 'cause I run linux. But just this morning, I've had to 'fix' 2 BSODs on others.

    Windows is a crappy design. There's no getting around it.

    In fact, Linux/Un*x boxes are more security risks because of their great support for multiple users. Nice to see you acknowledge *nix boxes "great support for multiple users". Something Windows was supposed to do, and still sux at. I haven't seen a BSOD in over 2 years. Multiple user accounts on *nix boxes are less of a threat to everyone than a winhozer

    With Windows, any user can keep it up to date (as up to date as Microsoft makes it) by clicking a button. </quote> That's the problem w. closed source. It stays shitty because nobody else can fix it.

  158. It really is a rollercoaster by theolein · · Score: 2

    Last year it started with the German Bundestag Linux initiative and the French government's open source requirements, moved on to the Chinese government's Linux move, crossed the Pacific to Peru and that intelligent senator there rebutting MS-Peru's words one by one, actually made it past Heathrow customs in the UK, shot down the Atlantic to Namibia, passing by Spain on the way, going round the Cape of good Hope to nest in Japan and now move back to India.

    It truly is amazing just how well Linux is being adopted. Most of this is serverside however, but I give Microsoft's server business another year or two of profitability before no one goes for Ms servers anymore in a big way. .NET server and co might be extremely good performers but when you can get three boxes for the price of one server licence, which one would you go for?

    In addition I think the rollercoaster will only gather speed from now, where even total MS butt kissers like the good folk here in Switzerland start to realise that MS isn't doing anything for them and start getting a clue on Linux. OpenOffice will most likely also only increase in use and I can veritably see the day when MS actually starts losing money. Given their size, I think they'll burn through the 40 Billion real quick.

  159. apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there you have it.

  160. What a grandstander... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone's always trying to outdo Ghandi on that nonviolent resistance stuff ...

  161. Way to Go INDIA by subzero_ice · · Score: 1


    Indians have done it again.




    I am proud to be an Indian.

  162. Those hoosiers are pretty brave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indiana should be proud of this decision. Cautious but proud.
    Indian ?? as in India ???
    oh
    nevermind

  163. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by fitten · · Score: 1

    BSOD are usually caused by crappy drivers of some sort. Get your admin to install WinXP and use updated drivers.

    I've run many types of boxes and have found Un*x and Un*x-alikes are very useful in certain roles, typically servers and compute engines, but still are severely lacking in UI design and usability for the masses, IMO. They make great servers but aren't friendly at all to a user, especially non-tech users.

    I'll admit I haven't had much experience with a wide variety of Linux distros (I used Slackware for a long time and a year or so ago decided to go with RedHat), but I know that I wouldn't want to spend the afternoon trying to talk my mom through a software install using rpm from RedHat and I'd rather repeatedly throw salt in my eyes than try to get her to compile something.

    From a developer standpoint, I don't want to have to spend time getting tools to work rather than working on my problem. Why should I have to spend significant amounts of time dorking with autoconf and makefiles instead of writing software? I've been there and done that and don't want to waste time there again. Also, I like tools like an IDE that automatically incorporates my code into what it already knows like in the intellisense of MS Dev Studio. Leaving one tool in order to go somewhere else to use another tool breaks my train of thought. In some cases, integration of tools is a good thing. Frequently, the tools on Un*x and such have zero discoverability so are frustrating and time consuming to learn. Computer tools should make things easy, not distract.

    Anyway, I use RedHat at home some but it is by far my main machine because I can't get it to do many of the things I can on my Windows boxes (or as easy when there is similar functionality -- engineer afterthought GUIs for instance).

    With WinXP, my stuff works, the things I need to do get done, and it is easy and efficient. I can do many of the same things on my Linux box, but it takes longer, is more work overall, and is more arduous, in my experience.

  164. Dalits (untouchables) need not apply...... by hughk · · Score: 2

    Caste is definitely still relevant in India.Whilst I would agree that the prejudice is supressed, it definitely still exists.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
    1. Re:Dalits (untouchables) need not apply...... by donutello · · Score: 2

      And race is still relevant in the US. Whilst I would agree that the prejudice is suppressed, it definitely still exists.

      Read the parent post to my post. The author says that because casteism exists in India, therefore Bill Gates is refusing to do "business that way". By that same logic, other countries would have to stop trading with the US.

      Every country has its fringe elements who practice various practices - Indias are no worse than those in most other places including the US.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
  165. Other news! by budalite · · Score: 2

    And in other news, the town council of Lynchburg, Kentucky has switched to moonshine, saying open source booze is just a win-win situation.

    Glad to hear of the "coup", but is this place of any size, importance to the IT world? Just curious. }:{)||

  166. That sound you hear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is the collective moan of 10 million linux geeks masturbating.

  167. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    As it is, IMHO you definately put the ass in assume.

    Wow, thanks! I have a new favourite putdown!

  168. Re:India will learn the hard-knocks truth.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HI SLASHDOT!

    Please add a moderation category for "AstroTurf."

    And no, OS X is NOT LINUX BASED.

  169. The underlying issue is hard to see ... Free Trade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will not be easy for many to see the big picture behind this decision by a state in India.

    It is not about computers or Windows, or free software or Bill's Winopoly. (Bill is merely a cute preppy boy, who was handed his monopoly, for a functional purpose, by a fascist banking apparatus within our Government. It's irrelevant to them that he "got rich.") If you are able to see an occasional finger of the military-industrial-oil cartel permeating into your home life-work schedule, then you should also be able to see the new Homeland security-Fraudulent banking mafia at work permeating the same. Welcome to the future, Americans, your government is now run by Marxist radicals, posing as neo-con conservatives, flanked by mob of brainwashed "rightwing" idiots led by the likes of Jesus-is-my-rabbi "Christians," such as Sun-Mydong-Moon and Pat "I can't wait to kill me some Mooslins" Robertson.

    India was the last nation to fight a war for independence from the British Free-trade system, and it is easily shown that while America has now been completely subverted by British agents, beginning with KKK'er Woodrow Wilson and his Federal Reserve, and inch-by-inch rendered into its opposite, India has taken on the burden of continuing the American Revolution, especially in its concept of organizing progress through the principle of creating an uplifting general welfare, for everybody, and not through the principle of protecting a right-of-greed for fascist banker friends and their communist monopolists. While the U.S. dismantles its economic and scientific infrastructure, including our space program, India is organizing hers, albeit with little media coverage in the U.S., including plans for irrigation of deserts, and building nuclear power plants, as well as one to put a human being on the Moon.

    If current long-range British-American plans are implemented, India will be economically and militarily sabotaged long before the latter shit will ever be allowed to hit the fan. (Do not imagine even for a minute, that Sadam and the Ayatolah, and their Henry Kissinger-Zbignew Brezensky trained Al-queda, are the real targets of current military and media apparatus. Nor is capture of oil reserves by David Rockefeller, the target, though doing so might momentarily improve the balance sheets for his collapsing banks, although they are the largest shareholder of our collapsing Federal Reserve.

    Along with knocking the humanists in the Arabian world back down to 18th century technologies, as Kissinger has already done for Africa, the long range plan is the economic isolation and eventual destruction of India. Thus, in its struggle to organize internal progress, India has also chosen for itself an ideal, and an enemy of that ideal, which goes much higher than mere choice of a free OS or a mono OS. Imagine the political shockwaves and repurcussions of a Moon landing, by Indians. Can you imagine the British bankers and their Free-trade mafiosos ever organizing such a task?

    Meanwhile, the British Royals are becoming apoplectic, over the scientific and industrial progress which India is making, using the principles of Lincoln and Henry Carey, both 19th-Century Americans whom Ghandi studied and loved, posthumously. This is inspite of the current isolation of India economically and politically, by a nuclear tipped rogue nation, and British-Israeli-American protectorate, Pakistan. (Yes, the Ayatolah was trained by Kissinger, as are the current Pakistani radicals trained by Kissinger's protege, Brezensky.) Look at the preferences which the recent parade of American lap dancers for British Royals, e.g. our recent presidents, have shown for a British protectorate, Communist China over India. (Yes, the Mao was trained by Bertrand Russell, and his revolution was financed by the British, with the explicit purpose of ending a prior revolution in China, organized by another student of Lincoln and Carey, Sun Yatsen.)

  170. Sanskrit? by HerbieStone · · Score: 1

    Does it mean that Linux docs are *literaly* going to be written in sanskrit?!?

    1. Re:Sanskrit? by mbvgp · · Score: 1

      Noone speaks sanskrit in India. It is only studied and spoken in some academic language studies circles. We are taught some amount of Sanskrit in school but that is generally not enough.

  171. Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...after he made that statement he had to crawl over a couple dozen people starving and living on the street to get to his Mercedes limo to drive back to his mansion.

  172. In unrelated news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A BSA representative stated "... working off a tip from an Anonymous Coward the BSA conducted a massive raid of the Indian state of Madhya Pradesh. All computers were seized for evidence." An RIAA representative responded "The RIAA is seeking damages from those dam injens. After all Linux is only used for stealing out copyrighted music!"

    Sen. Disney (FL), stated "I plan on adding the Indian state of Madhya Pradesh to the list of terriorist states as a rider on the next homland defence bill. Windows is good for homeland defence!"

  173. indian as my ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you, sir, are NOT an indian. an indian would NEVER use the term 'lemme'. simple as that. you are too undereducated to be an indian. their grasp of the language is such that they do not have or use 'slang'. they are much closer to 'proper english' than most americans, (or english(british) for that matter.)

    next time do some research before you expose yourself as a moron.

  174. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by pyrrho · · Score: 1

    as another poster pointed out...

    you are thinking of the "free market" and competition within it. Capitalism is about "capital", and being able to make money from property rights.

    --

    -pyrrho

  175. goatse by fenix+down · · Score: 1

    This is a tricky one, doubly obfuscated.
    goatse.cx......site cannot load images
    Fabulous.

  176. No apache jokes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    W00t, already over 263 comments, and still no silly Apache jokes. Come on Slashdot - you got to have some humour to throw at me.

  177. Re:At least someone is making a stand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It wasn't India, but rather a particular state in India.

    Please to RTFA.

    --AC

  178. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by istartedi · · Score: 2

    There are two schools of thought on this. The first one is that Linux is pro-capitalist because companies are using a different "service based" business model. Adherents to this school of thought argue that the service model is a better way to distribute software and will win in the long run.

    The other school of thought is that Linux is anti-capitalist because it seeks to drive other operating systems out of the market and replace them with a public monopoly. When the public monopoly fails to achieve timely development, it is likely to seek government funding (and already has in some cases). Thus, the government eventually becomes the sole provider of OS development services. Government ownership of a business is the classic definition of socialism.

    Contrary to what the other guy said, posts about Linux and Socialism are *not* trolls.

    As you might have guessed, I hold to the 2nd school of thought. The first school makes sense as long as the government "stays out" doesn't fund it. Proponents of the first school argue that the government already funds proprietary software by providing PD research and enforcing copyright law. The counterargument to that is that PD research is available to both camps. The cost of enforcing copyright law argument falls apart when you realize that if all software were GPL'd, the government would have to enforce "exclusive supplier" contracts which could effectively negate the GPL.

    Also, Linux is under GPL, which came from RMS, who is an RED :). But seriously, if you read the GNU website you will see that it makes no secret of the fact that the movement is based in Leftist ideology.

    And the debate will almost certainly go on and on from here...

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  179. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  180. Windows bashing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, don't be so hard on Windows and Billy.
    With OpenOffice and Mozilla it becomes fairly usable. ;)

  181. Have been using Linux in India since 1994 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first time we used Linux was in 1994.
    You're right the opinion of those three guys doesn't matter a lot.
    The company I worked for was www.rsys.com.

  182. Re:Awright! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, cow is sacred because it is associated with Krishna. Killing a cow is killing Brahmin Krishna--not a good path to increasing one's karma.

    http://krishna.org/ctfote/cow.html

    http://mathuravrindavan.com/mathura1/aboutkrishn a. htm

  183. I'm sick of this troll. by twitter · · Score: 2, Flamebait
    We've all encountered Samba, Sendmail, and Kernel panics too. We've encountered varying ways of bringing up Runlevels, frontends that configure stuff, but you don't know WHERE it configures 'em.

    I'd have encountered SAMBA if I had any windoze machines, but I don't.

    I've got exim instead of sendmail, so I don't really know if there's anything hard about sendmail. Exim is easy to configure and comes very well documented.

    Kernel panic? Well, that has happened to me once or twice. Once on an overheating machine. Once on a machine where I screwed up by not knowing how to work lilo. Never on a reasonlable machine with a normal install of Debian or Red Hat. Ever.

    In any case, there is no comparing the "problems" you have cited to M$ crap. When a piece of free software does not work there IS something you can do about it. If the man or info page fails you, unlikely, and a google search does not turn up an answer right away, you can always download and read the source code itself. I've never had to do that, ever, becuse man and info generally list where all the configuration files are and those are almost always well documented. What happens when some bogus M$ code pulls up the old blue screen of death? You reboot, look at MSDN, google, and what not. But you can never ever actually fix the problem because only one company sits on the source and you are at their mercy. They get around to it when they get around to it, sometimes that's never and that's why M$ boxes fail so often, are so easy to break into and cost so much to own and run.

    Poor pot and kettle, they've been sitting in the smoke of propriatory software so long they can't see the light of day.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:I'm sick of this troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What happens when some bogus M$ code pulls up the old blue screen of death? You reboot, look at MSDN, google, and what not. But you can never ever actually fix the problem because only one company sits on the source and you are at their mercy

      The first thing you do is load the crash dump into debugger and analyze it. All the necessary tools and debug symbols are public.

      If you've never even done that then having the windows source wouldn't help you anyway.

    2. Re:I'm sick of this troll. by Matey-O · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Then make me a foe. :P

      And you've missed the point entirely. By your same arguement, I haven't seen the support issues you're describing.

      Purchasing server grade hardware, server grade operating systems and server grade support, I haven't seen these BSOD's your talking about. Nor do I have any machines (or workflow issues) sitting idle because I can't access Microsoft's code.

      I DO have a few machines that can't recompile a kernel to save their lives. Take the exact goddamn makefile and code tree, and it's compiling on my P4 desktop, but not the Celeron fileserver OR the PII 266 laptop.

      It's all about perception, dude, don't tell me your shit don't stink.

      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    3. Re:I'm sick of this troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But purchasing "server grade hardware, server grade operating systems, and server grade support" just leads to server-grade prices.

    4. Re:I'm sick of this troll. by jelle · · Score: 2

      "Take the exact goddamn makefile and code tree, and it's compiling on my P4 desktop, but not the Celeron fileserver OR the PII 266 laptop."

      Golden tip of the day: The Makefile is not the kernel configuration file, it's the .config file that configures it. Note you need to do a 'make xconfig', or 'make menuconfig', or 'make oldconfig' if you're using a 'clean' unpacked kernel tarball and want to apply the .config file you just copied into it.

      What is the error you get? Have you investigated further or did you only try the blind approach of 'lets try this on another machine'?

      Sounds like you have a "CONFIG_MPENTIUM4=y" in your .config

      Or something similar in your gcc, binutils, or libc6-dev, or you're simply running out of memory/swap.

      BTW, none of my windows machines can recompile their kernel.

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    5. Re:I'm sick of this troll. by rstovall · · Score: 1

      I DO have a few machines that can't recompile a kernel to save their lives. Take the exact goddamn makefile and code tree, and it's compiling on my P4 desktop, but not the Celeron fileserver OR the PII 266 laptop.

      Easy son... if you'd have read the kernel README (in with that source code you are complaining about), you'd know you need to configure to match the hardware you'll be building on. You can not just carry a make file from one hardware platform to a dissimilar one.

      BTW, I've compiled on all those platforms with no issues recently. Next time, RTFM or remember it better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt!

      --
      Confined though we are, infinity dwells within.
  184. COW! by thegnu · · Score: 1

    In Hinduism, as is my understanding, the highest form of life you can acheive is COW. So if you're good, and you tip the karma balance in the right direction, and are lucky, you might end up COW. I personally am shooting for some sort of ape or eagle. I don't know if this qualifies as worship, but it goes beyond respect. I heard an anecdote in which Da Free John ordered soup in a restaurant, ate half of it, and said, "This is very good. What is in it?" "Beef," the waiter replied. Da Free John immediately vomited, waited a moment, and said, "Bring me more soup. I must get over this silly notion that cows are holy" So you see why normal everyday people, not just jackasses, may be confused about the status of cows in India?

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  185. Re:Let the racist comments begin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > While you may have assumed (incorrectly) that all H1B Visa holders come from India

    Most. Just look around.

  186. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by Eythian · · Score: 1

    Most of the cybercafes in India are used primarily to send email (hotmail, yahoo, rediffmail, etc.)

    I'm at a university where this is the case, too. I wandered past a row af Win2k computers a little while ago: hotmail, hotmail, bsod, hotmail yahoo, hotmail...

  187. Re:India will learn the hard-knocks truth.... by manja+mali · · Score: 1

    Is it just my head or the kernel of cavity on yours .... what does a dude in a village need DirectX8.0 for. His need is simply met if on a text-ui the market rate for milk and veggies gets displayed.
    the applications he/she needs are very much available on GNU/Linux platforms ..

    So waht seems to be my point here? (/.)

    --
    part of the parcel !
  188. we'd stand up and cheer by Xtifr · · Score: 2

    what would you have said if the headline was the American state of Arkansas, has opted to switch to Linux from Microsoft?

    I'd stand up and cheer. Just like I did when the city of Largo announced they were switching to Linux. Sure, it'd be even nicer if it were the whole country of India, but this is still a step in the right direction. The fact is that each one of these small victories adds credibility to this funky free software stuff and makes it that much more likely that the next small group pondering what I'm pondering will go ahead and make the switch to freedom.

    1. Re:we'd stand up and cheer by MHV · · Score: 1

      Of course we'd stand up and cheer... We would simply not yell that the American government is running Linux. :) Gnah! I'm just fussy about details.

  189. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Strong property rights are an essential element of capitalism.

    Okay, so please shut up about the voluntary nonsense. It's not about voluntary relationships. If I'm cold, and there is an empty office building, I can't sleep there because the owner will call the cops (force) to enforce his property "right" for me to freeze to death on the street. Even if most people in the town disagree with that outcome.

  190. Re:At least someone is making a stand by marko123 · · Score: 1

    1. Switch to Linux
    2. ...
    3. Hindu Prophet

    --
    http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
  191. offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that even legal sending a Redhat cd to India?
    Isn't the encryption in mozilla and konqueror over the limit for exportation? I have no clue. How about
    taking your laptop out of the country? Do you have to remove all your encryption ablility over 40 bits?
    I don't know, that is why I'm asking.

    1. Re:offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Export restrictions only apply to about four countries. From memory, Cuba, Iraq, Taliban-controlled Afghanistan (?), and maybe both of Iran/North Korea.

  192. Re:Awright! by stor · · Score: 1

    Correctamundo.

    This should be modded up. It is indeed the association with Krishna that's important wrt cows.

    Cheers
    Stor

    --
    "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
  193. Wine does run starcraft. by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    In fact, many hours were devoted just to making sure that it would run starcraft.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  194. My experiences in India by Ryu2 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    While I'm glad that India is embracing open-source and Linux so heartily, it's really going to do jack shit for that country unfortunately. I'm an American businessman in the import- export business, so as you might guess, my frequent travels take me to many places around the world, on every continent.

    I wanted to share my experience in the "great" country of India.

    So, I was in Bangalore, India last March for about a week on business. A bit of background: Bangalore is a special technology development area that the Indian government set up to try and give foreigners the illusion that India really ISN'T a moldering third world country with its populace living in utterly squalid, filthy slums. Here, rules are relaxed and IT and other technology is encouraged. Well, let me tell you this, if this is India's best, then I'd hate to see the worst.

    Anyways, when I stepped off the plane from Delhi (which was no paradise itself, as that place has gone down the shitter since the Brits left) I was shocked. The whole place smelled like a combination of vomit, death and cow dung that had been left out in the sun for a day or so. And it was probably BECAUSE there was vomit and cow dung all over, with many people seemingly near death (or are they dead already) lying in agony in the streets from God knows what. Kids were playing in filthy pools, throwing shit around. I almost retched, and I've certainly been in some sketchy places in my travels but NOTHING like this.

    People spit everywhere. Trash litters the streets. I found myself looking DOWNWARD much more than looking FORWARD when I walked.

    Noise pollution is endemic. It doesn't help that their infernal language consists of gibberish that is a cacophony for any human ear to bear. How do they speak and listen to that shit without going crazy all day long is beyond me.

    Anyways, Indians stink -- literally. There is no concept of personal hygiene whatsoever. Meetings with even top officials were hourlong sessions of having to endure hot sweaty bodies and rancid breath eminating from mouths missing a few teeth. Geez, at least use deodorant for crying out loud. And you guys might want to re-think that cow-worship thing -- they aren't exactly the cleanest of animals to be keeping around, and sharing living spaces with humanity.

    The hypocrisy, corruption, and double-standards from the highest levels of government on over are the norm at the same time India opens up to the world as a purported source for "cheap" IT and other "skilled labor". Foreigners get charged as much as five times for transportation, lodging, food, and everything else.

    Traffic is horrible. Rules are non-existent except for at traffic lights: red means to go fast, green means to go REALLY REALLY fast.

    The Indian people themselve are pretty apathetic and everyone just wants to get out of that hell hole, so you see smuggling rings shipping people out hidden in truck beds and ships, all too often with tragic results.

    The whole country, in my assessment is a lost case. Even the cheap IT services that everyone talks about can be found in Eastern Europe or Asia, where at least the country and its people don't experience stuff like plague and cholera as a day to day way of life.

    Anyways, the one redeeming quality were the girls. I was having dinner (by the way, how can anyone eat that curry shit for all their lives, is way beyond me) with a young female business associate, and afterwards, we had a few drinks. One thing lead to another and I paid 1500 rupees (about $30 US) for a great fuck, with a bright 25 year old programmer. Boy, those Indian girls sure can get it on -- almost as good as the CHinese. Much better than even the vaunted Thai whores, and worlds apart from anything in Las Vegas or in Europe.

    So yeah, screw the hell hole that's India. It's a lost cause of a country suspsended by a hollow facade of so-called IT development that's just show more than anything.

    --
    There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    1. Re:My experiences in India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess what..this guy is a porn lover and is one of those people who just keep putting porno on slashdot....so he just made some story up....

    2. Re:My experiences in India by Bruce+Losis · · Score: 1

      What a wanker! and not even an original one. I guess he's just found out about form letters.

      --
      Don't believe the nonsense, unless you hear it from me directly.
    3. Re:My experiences in India by ainsoph · · Score: 2

      COINTELNPRO

  195. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by tshak · · Score: 1

    Hey - I contribute code to newsgroups, public articles, etc. But it's one thing to release a small and useful OSS utility, it's another to participate in a huge project (like an OS or Office App) and essentially INCREASE THE PROFITS OF CORPORATIONS for free. I still don't get it. ALso, name another profession that has a group of essentially "hippies" doing the same thing.

    --

    There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
  196. Well, they can convert to budhism. by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Or Islam, christianity, etc...

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  197. Re:Really? (OT) by Guru2Newbie · · Score: 0
    "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword." -- Mathew 10:34

    "We come in peace
    Shoot to kill.
    Shoot to kill.
    Shoot to kill.

    We come in peace
    Shoot to kill.
    Shoot to kill, men."
    --Captain James T. Kirk, Star Trekkin' song

  198. quote by rsax · · Score: 1
    But it's a start, and as Gandhi said, "A journey of a thousand miles, starts with just one step."

    I think Lao Tzu said that.

  199. We don't need no stinking shit. by twitter · · Score: 2
    By your same arguement, I haven't seen the support issues you're describing. Purchasing server grade hardware, server grade operating systems and server grade support, I haven't seen these BSOD's your talking about. Nor do I have any machines (or workflow issues) sitting idle because I can't access Microsoft's code.

    I've seen "server grade" stuff BSOD when it was running M$'s "server grade" OS. It was a big shiny multi processor beast from Dell and very beautiful. The extra cost did not buy the company much and, gasp, it worked just like the non "server grade" stuff we all know and use. As Beavis once said, "It's amazing how mass produced objects are nearly identical."

    It's all about perception, dude, don't tell me your shit don't stink.

    I don't use or recomend shit. My hardware is cheap, my software is free yet it all works great.

    And you've missed the point entirely.

    I don't think so. You tried to tell me that buggy M$ junk was just as good as free software. Experience indicates otherwise, regardless of the hardware. You also implied that there was little difference between free and non free documentation. Again, that's false for all the reasons outlined in my last post.

    Then make me a foe. :P

    You will have to be uglier than that.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  200. Re:Awright! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    not because of some strange religious edict ... but because cattle seen as a higher, more enlightened life form than humans.

    Uh....

    ;)

  201. You take any anthro classes at the business school by ainsoph · · Score: 2

    Must not have, or maybe its just another case of the epidemic sweeping the country these days:

    xenophobia

    Yeah thats right.

    Know what? I have been over there too. It sure is a shock to see the way the world is, and yeah its painful as well watching the poverty, pain and suffering that envelopes *most* of the globe.

    For me it was an eyeopener, for you it was an excuse to get a cheap fuck (you cheap fuck, fuck you, you stupid ignorant imperialist fuck), and to come home and fuckin complain.

    Fuck you. Oh and fuck you. Oh and, when are you idiots gonna realize its only a teeny bit of the population that gets to live in a SUV driving, Elimidate watching, non-corrupt (cough cough) paradise that is the "West".

    I suggest you goto fuckin college and do a little studying before you make yer next trip. And by the way, hope you fall in a pit of shit while you wipe your ass with your hand.

    Asshole.

  202. Re:Awright! by bot · · Score: 1

    Karma referes to the deeds that a person does. The belief in Hinduism is that these deeds (good/bad) affect your future (and future lives).

    It can also be used in a another sense- duty or work. Every person has duties towards society based on his profession. As an engineer for instance, your duty is to write good code etc. The Geeta refers to this meaning a lot, especially where it says that we have authority only over our work/duty, but not on the fruit of it (Karmanye vadhikaraste ma faleshu kadachana).

  203. I Call BS! sorry by Cyno01 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Wellstone was the one dissenter to the Patriot act.
    Actually my senator, Russ Feingold, was the only one to vote against the USA Patriot Act. An address of his revealing his reasons for dong so. Wellstone was a good guy, he was IMO the most liberal senator next to Feingold. [conspiracy]Anyone else find it weird that one of the most liberal senators who was up for re-election died in a plane crash days before the election. A few years back Mel Carnahan, Ashcrofts rival for the MO senate seat died in a plane crash shortly before the election. Chew on that.[/conspiracy]
    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:I Call BS! sorry by Darby · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Actually my senator, Russ Feingold [senate.gov], was the only one to vote against the USA Patriot Act.

      Ah, my mistake.
      I got them mixed up. The point stands with the names changed.

      Another interesting fact that's made even more bizarre by its tragic end is:

      In August 2001, FBI Deputy Director John O'Neill resigned from his post over George W. Bush's policy on terrorism and Osama bin Laden. Specifically, O'Neill's department was told to "back off" their bin Laden and Al Queda investigations while the Bush administration negotiated with the Taliban. O'Neill became the security chief of the World Trade Center - where he died during the events of 9/11.
      Quoted from here.

    2. Re:I Call BS! sorry by Darby · · Score: 2

      Now how exactly is a factual quote and a link Flamebait?
      The fact that the moderator is too much of a coward to face the reality we're living in does *not* make something flamebait.

  204. MOD PARENT UP! by Cyno01 · · Score: 2

    If i had the points man. Really, BG isn't that bad a guy, i know M$ sucks, but he did build a multi-national, multi-billion company out of his garage, he deserves a little respect. The point is this one man has given nearly 6 billion *pinky to mouth* dollars to charity.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there's drug traffickers who have built multi-national companies out of their Villas. They give millions back to communities in central asia and south america (they really do.).

      So clearly they're not that bad.

      MS gets people hooked on point-n-click droolware, turning computers into (metaphorical) toasters. Drug pushers get people hooked on chemicals that turn their internal computers (brains) into (metaphorical toasters.

      Just because what MS do is "legal" (well, actually, it isn't...) and what the drug traffickers do is "illegal" matters very little.

      Don't confuse legality with morality.

  205. Bull. by laptop006 · · Score: 1

    If NTFS is not cleanly unmounted it requires cleaning, one of the MAJOR reasons to journel.

    And ACL's on NTFS, they are FAR worse than on netware which really did do them right the first time.

    --
    /* FUCK - The F-word is here so that you can grep for it */
    1. Re:Bull. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      If NTFS is not cleanly unmounted it requires cleaning, one of the MAJOR reasons to journel.

      You don't know shit, and you can't spell "journal" even though there are numerous examples in the parent thread.

      NTFS5 is journaling and requires no cleaning if shut down without being unmounted.

      You are just another anti-Microsoft zealot who hasn't done his homework.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Bull. by laptop006 · · Score: 1

      I don't work with Win2k, I can't trust it outside of a hardware firewall which is my situation admining WinNT4 due to idiot management (but a situation that should be fixed within a month), if they've improved it in NTFS5 so good for them, I don't use it on the server side at the moment, so I don't know.

      While I do prefer Linux, all of my present consulting jobs are administering various windows clients & servers.

      --
      /* FUCK - The F-word is here so that you can grep for it */
  206. Wonderful analogy. Brilliant in fact... by crovira · · Score: 2

    "You couldn't become either an automotive engineer or a mechanic without taking cars apart, nor can you become a decent CS grad, or admin, without disecting a few systems and seeing what makes them tick."

    And you can't do it without the source.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  207. ACL's by driehuis · · Score: 2

    ACL's done _right_ on NT? Give me a break!

    For those tuning in late, the UI for modifying an ACL on a directory gave the user two choices: either replace all underlying ACL's, or applying it just to the directory.

    The first would run the risk of wiping out all ACL's at a deeper level (I've seen the results of a misguided sysadmin wiping out the ACL's of all user directories, and it ain't pretty). Not applying it recursively of course leaves you with inconsistent ACL's.

    The beauty of Netware's ACL's was mentioned, but that solution would've been a serious deviation from the VMS heritage on which NT was built.

    To do ACL's right on NT isn't impossible (and maybe the interface has improved since NT 4.0, the last Windows release I'm certified on :-)

    But to do it right would mean designing a user interface which can do the _intended_ change (e.g., downgrade write access to readonly for user BILLG) without overwriting other restrictions. This would require a dialog such as the Word dialog when changing styles on selected text with multiple styles, which would at best be a challenge in training in its own right (how many people do you know that know how to operate the Style menus in Word? Just checking).

    I've dealt with ACL's on VMS, on RACF, on Netware and on NT. The only one I liked was the only one I could explain to fledgling administrators. The fact that you can't go back and undo a change on NTFS is something that goes so badly against user expectations that it just doesn't stick.

    --

    Bert Driehuis -- All I asked was a friggin' rotatin' chair. Throw me a bone here, people.

    1. Re:ACL's by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      NT offers you several options in ACLs these days. First, you can replace. Second, you can erase and specify. Third, you can inherit and add. Since NT gives least permission, you can inherit and then add and be sure that you won't be giving someone permission to a resource based on inherited ACLs as long as you explicitly deny them access.

      Meanwhile as of Win2k there are ACLs which apply to computers, and computers belong to groups, so not only can you determine access based on user but also on computer.

      Your problem does not apply to modern versions of Windows NT.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  208. Tips... by jelle · · Score: 3, Informative

    The point he was making that in windows it's often not documented, so it often ends up with trial and error, hours of kb searches, or just reinstalling with fingers crossed. In Linux, you have the source and the configuration files are human readable, you just need to find the beginning of the yellow brick road and follow it.

    "bringing up Runlevels,"

    Start at /etc/inittab and follow the rail of scripts, first the script on the 'si:' line, then look at the 'default:' line, and follow the 'l?:' line with '?' the runlevel. You'll probably find most your start and stop scripts in /etc/init.d, and /etc/rcS.d with links from /etc/rc?.d

    Most other configurations are in /etc, and per user ones in '.*' (hidden) files or directories of the user's home directory.

    Sendmail problems? Try postfix, you'll love it. Easier to configure, easier to understand, and better security track record. btw, configuration is in /etc/postfix... duh.

    Got a kernel panic and it's not because youre using the 2.5.x unstable kernels? -> Most probably hardware that is breaking down.

    --
    --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
  209. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by gobho · · Score: 1

    Well, it seems clear that most of you don't have any idea of WHAT the Gyandoot project is...It is *NOT* some kind of cybercafe, but a govt. initiative for IT-enabling rural areas, so that all the info required by the largely farmer-populace is available and accessible electronically - land records, foodgrain prices across the world, market info, weather etc...This info is crucial to farmers and helps them to keep in touch with the world...these kiosks have custom local language software, easy to use interfaces and this effort is recognised and widely appreciated the world over and funded by the World Bank...so money is *NOT* the only question...its the FREEDOM that matters...

    Please check World Bank Info on Gyandoot

  210. economics is when US tech jobs go to India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pardon me, but "plain economics" has a bad side. how come nobody (here or in govt) seems to raise a stink that Dell & other american companies are farming out their tech jobs to India? sure, it makes it cheaper for Dell, etc, but that depresses wages here in the states. today my wife met a programmer with 10 years experience whose company just offered her a job for $17/hour -- becuase they can get Indians to do the work for $4/hour, the programmer's boss thought she'd be happy with his "generosity".

  211. Lg English base allows further pooling of advances by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 2
    ... is hardly a 'small 3rd world country'. It has a population of over a billion and is the world's largest democratic nation.

    This is also more significant than any individual Chinese state going OSS.

    If I recall correctly, India also has the largest English speaking population. Since English (or specifically 'Merican) is the base tech language, it makes developments in India immediately accessible to the rest of the world.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  212. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by vb.warrior · · Score: 0

    You see the happy smiling person walking down the street holding the hand of his girlfriend? That will never be you, might as well get used to your parents basement and scaring females with your odour.

  213. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by ratamacue · · Score: 1

    What nonsense? Voluntary association is the essence of capitalism. It is nothing less than the core philosophy of capitalism. The first prerequisite of capitalism is that individuals are free to interact (trade) on a voluntary basis.

  214. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Again, what is voluntary about "you have food, I do not have food"? The person without food does not voluntarily go hungry.

    The core philosophy of capitalism is *not* freedom: it is property. The two are not entirely compatible. What good is freedom if it is only the freedom to choose which master I will serve?

  215. Kernel compilation issues. by Matey-O · · Score: 2

    On the PII laptop, I get various GCC coredumps, One the Celeron Fileserver, I get Errors during Make_Modules, on the PIV, it completes, but kernel panics when you use the image. It's from using the install tree that came with the distribution, and it's from getting the latest stable tree from Kernel.org This is with minimum Makefiles, full make files, 'make oldconfig' makefiles, I've yet to get one that'll work. Oh, and the distribution is RH8 All I wanted was the ability to mount (RO) an NTFS partition, which ISN'T compiled onto RedHat's kernel by default. Surfing around, I found another pre-compiled kernel that FUBU's during the RPM install. (RPM -iv blah.rpm - error - RPM -iv blah.rpm - blah.rpm already installed.) And this is all with READING THE FREE DOX and compiling the available code. And I'm sure very few other people had this problem.

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:Kernel compilation issues. by jelle · · Score: 2

      You probably have a hardware problem on the laptop (compiling the kernel is a known hardware problem finder because of its unique system load). On the celeron, you may have a missing or wrong supporting package, for exampel the /usr/include/linux directory may not be the correct one.

      The RH8 install tree doesn't give you the .config configuration file that you need to build a RH8 compatible kernel (unless you copy it manually, see the linuxexperience.com link below), so the P4 kernel panic could be either a misconfigured kernel (something like missing 'initrd support'), or something misconfigured in /etc/lilo.conf (wrong root partition).

      Did you check the NTFS development webpage. It has a special page for RedHat. Also this linkshould be helpful to het ntfs on redhat. It contains a step-by-step explanation.

      If you just want ntfs support, you don't need a new kernel. All you need is the ntfs.o module that is compatible with your kernel. Check if you have /lib/modules/*/fs/ntfs.o or /usr/src/linux/fs/ntfs/ntfs.o. If you do, try to insmod it. If you don't, you don't need to do 'make bzImage' or 'make zImage' to ge the module, a 'make modules' should give you the ntfs.o (if you configured it with 'make xconfig' or 'make menuconfig' to make the ntfs support module). If you get compile errors doing 'make modules', for any reason, just swith off compilation of any modules except ntfs (look for 'BLABLA=m' lines in the .config to find out what is configured to be compiled as module).

      I use Debian, so I can't verify it for RH, but I've had no problems getting a working ntfs support module for Debian.

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    2. Re:Kernel compilation issues. by Matey-O · · Score: 2

      Thanks, dude! I'll give those a shot. (Of course, it's all academic. I got tired of waiting, move the drive to another box, backed it up, then made it a reiserfs partition.)

      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  216. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by alan_d_post · · Score: 1

    That whole gift economy thing is just ESR trying to use free software to justify his warped political views (private property is The One True Holy Principle, other people don't really exist, etc.). Since when is the land of free software one of abundance? Just about every project is crying out for more developers. The unusual thing about free software is not the lack of "significant material-scarcity problems with survival goods," but the zero-marginal-reproduction-cost and the some-programmers-are-phenomenal factors. This enables cooperation among relatively few geographically dispersed people to produce lots of good software.

    Look at his analogies:

    1) Potlach -- consipicuous consumption as a display of wealth
    2) Super-rich people's philanthropy -- they are realizing that when they die people will say they were bastards

    Neither of these situations is remotely similar to a the globally-distributed non-hierarchical cooperative project that is the free software movement.

  217. Linux in the corporate world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here, London, big bank (think big please, you may guess correctly). We are evaluating Linux. For both desktop and backoffice. Linux is credible today and most people are realizing that even in the technically illeterate board rooms.

  218. Re:India will learn the hard-knocks truth.... by roachmotel3 · · Score: 2

    I saw your post while I was meta-moderating, and though I don't agree that your post is a troll, you have a few well-placed stereo-types in your head about things.

    First off, Mac OSX is NOT a linux based OS, it's based on FreeBSD. It's like saying that MacOS and AmigaOS are the same thing because they both run on motorola processors. This may be an anal point, but it's very important.

    Second, apple hardware and software is NOT significantly more expensive than a PC. It sounds to me like you're falling victim to megahertz marketing where you compare a p3-800 to a g3-800 and expect the same performance. Let's not even mention TCO with a Mac vs. Windows in terms of support and service. I used to work telephone tech support at an ISP in my region, in the Mac queue. And yes, while it is true that there are fewer Mac users, the problems we experienced were always much simpler than the PC side of the house. Invariably it was "I forgot my password" or "I can't download an email message because it's too big".

    In so far as an integrated groupware suite, you are correct in that there is NOT a comprehensive solution that is ready for prime time yet. But, remember, the linux application development cycle is MUCH shorter than on a windows platform, especially when Microsoft is doing it ;)

    Finally, have you ever actually used a linux office suite? Like Star Office, or Open Office, to try and open a document? Have you done it lately? Perhaps you should sit down, install a copy of RedHat 8.0 on a decent machine, and see the functionality you have.

  219. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by ratamacue · · Score: 1
    The core philosophy of capitalism is *not* freedom: it is property.

    Aha, but property *is* freedom: the freedom to own and control property (including your own body), and the freedom to trade property with others on a voluntary basis. This is why capitalism requires limited (or non-existent) government: the level of freedom and property rights is proportional to the size of government. Taxing is the process of acquiring property by force, and this represents involuntary association, which is hostile to the philosophy of capitalism, i.e. voluntary association. The purest form of capitalism is therefore anarchy, or the total non-existence of the state.

    The person without food does not voluntarily go hungry.

    This is a common misconception. Capitalism does not guarantee equal outcome, only equal opportunity. Under capitalism, all individuals are equal in terms of liberty -- and hence, in terms of opportunity. Socialism is the political philosophy which was supposed to achieve equal outcome, at the expense of equal opportunity. The two concepts are essentially philosophical opposites.

    The concepts of freedom and property are not only compatible, they are one and the same. You cannot achieve one without the other. Be aware that property rights do not imply property, but only the equal opportunity to acquire and control property.

  220. Re:Cyber-cafes will never change from pirated WinX by tomhudson · · Score: 2
    You see the happy smiling person walking down the street holding the hand of his girlfriend? That will never be you, might as well get used to your parents basement and scaring females with your odour. </quote>

    (Sigh ... time to feed the off-topic troll ...) it's been me, or I wouldn't have 2 daughters, now would I?

    It's just that now that they're on their own, I'm being more discriminating in what my next girlfriend is going to be like.

    But, back on topic ... I can see cyber-cafes in Asia using a mix of technologies, just as we do elsewhere in the world. And, as per your post, just like it takes all kinds to make a world.