Slashdot Mirror


5 Predictions for 2012

Structured Audio writes "Mike Langberg of the Merc put up his 5 technology predictions for 2012. Well chosen, although of course in 2012 speech recognition will still be 10 years away :-)."

502 comments

  1. Hey by redshift-systems · · Score: 1

    I predict 2012 will be a great year for wine.

    1. Re:Hey by Telepathetic+Man · · Score: 1, Funny

      I predict 2012 will be a great year for whine!

      --
      Just because you can, does not mean you should.
    2. Re:Hey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Care for a little cheese?

    3. Re:Hey by jusdisgi · · Score: 1

      Surely wine will be safely dead by 2012, a casualty of Microsoft's continued changing of the .dll's and the win api...coupled with wine's own weak licensing causing their to have more forks than users.

      WINE: use only in moderation.

      Hunter.

      --
      Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
  2. Hmm by altaic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder why all the articles which hold predictions are "bold."

    1. Re:Hmm by Zeinfeld · · Score: 5, Insightful
      From his 1992 'predictions': Direct-broadcast satellite television, which didn't exist in 1992, is now a certified hit,

      I had a direct broadcast satellite in '92, so did over a million people in the UK. Predicting the launch in the US is hardly that impressive.

      This years predictions include the Tivo like PVR becomming ubiquitous...

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    2. Re:Hmm by packeteer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because in 2012 the mayan calander ends and well all be dead anyway so who cares...

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    3. Re:Hmm by MikeDX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is it just me that found reading the 1992 - 2002 predictions and results more interesting than the "Bold technology predictions for 2012"?

    4. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did as well, since they clearly showed he's a crackhead, while the new predictions simply show that he doesn't learn from his mistakes. People aren't going to want their phones tell their friends where they are, anymore than they want radio tags to tell their employers where they are. I sure don't want my washing machine reporting back to its manufacturer, but I have no qualms with it determing, for itself, that it is no longer functioning under normal operational parameters.

    5. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with open predictions are that they can become self-fulfilling prophecies.
      I would be more amazed if he sealed his ideas up in a buried time vault and dug it up in 10 years - then see what has happened.

    6. Re:Hmm by Zeinfeld · · Score: 3, Interesting
      People aren't going to want their phones tell their friends where they are, anymore than they want radio tags to tell their employers where they are.

      I had great difficulty trying to explain to mobile phone companies that the idea of selling data on where their customers were was a non-starter businesswise.

      The business problem comes into focus when you consider that politicians tend to be avaracious consumers of wireless technology (both the Bush and Gore campaigns used RIM pagers), they also have serious security concerns. The ones I talked to imediately realized that the technology would be abused by stalkers, nutcases and assasins.

      I sure don't want my washing machine reporting back to its manufacturer, but I have no qualms with it determing, for itself, that it is no longer functioning under normal operational parameters.

      I don't want my washing machine to call the manufacturer, but loging a problem with the home maintenance center would be OK. This is the sort of thing that Web services will be big for.

      I think that devices will talk but they will talk inside the home first and any external communication will be with permission from the owner.

      Having the washing machine tell me when it needs repair is not a killer app. A status light on the front panel can achieve the same result. But having the thing tell me when the cycle has completed and the clothes are ready to go into the dryer, that is useful - I am writing this three floors above the washing machine in the basement.

      Equally, Negroponte's fridge that orders stuff itself is inescapably clueless. There are in fact 'fridges' of that type, we call them vending machines and lots of them are now wired to report their inventory levels so the guy in the truck knows when to go and fill them up.

      However it would be reasonably usefull to be able to check the contents of the fridge from my handheld PC when I am in the store and wondering if I need to buy more OJ, milk, and eggs. I suspect that a usable system would involve weight sensors and perhaps some sort of barcode printer / scanner built onto the side of the fridge for the frozen stuff. Problem with any such system however is that the discipline required to use it tends to be too much for most.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    7. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      However it would be reasonably usefull to be able to check the contents of the fridge from my handheld PC when I am in the store and wondering if I need to buy more OJ, milk, and eggs. I suspect that a usable system would involve weight sensors and perhaps some sort of barcode printer / scanner
      It would be much more reasonable, to simply have a digital camera, and to turn the light on with the door closed so it could feed you a snapshot of what's in the fridge. Not only could this be used at the store, but maybe, just maybe you could convince your kids to not stand in front of the fridge with the door open trying to decide if you have any food/drinks they like in there for half an hour. Nah, the latter is a pipedream, but seriously, a picture is worth 1000 barcodes ;-)
      why try to build a computer smart enough to tell if you've got a carton of milk in the fridge when a simple glance at a snapshot and any normal human can instantly recognize if that jug on the top shelf is a milk or an orange juice bottle, and if they're at least semi-clear about how much is left, even without needing a barcode to be properly lined up, or a weight measurment device to try to figure out if it's almost empty.
      Yes, for vending machines it's a wonderful thing to incorperate sensors, since the product is carefully controlled already. For a home fridge people aren't going to be predictable enough for any system to be perfect, even a snapshot won't do much good if you can only see part of what's in the fridge.
      BTW I found thje fact that this guy is predicting UPNP to take off extremely amusing, he even describes it's mode of operation as implemented in windows... you aren't even supposed to know that microsoft has the ability to control/communicate with UPNP devices on the LAN. So that is your fridge for whatever reason had a wireless LAN access, and was running upnp and some non-windows OS windows could force the fridge to 'crash' until you upgrade it with a Certified Windows Fridge, which would still crash, but only because of bugs, and not because of denial of refridgeration attacks.

    8. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Yes, according to Terence Mckenna, 2012 will be a time of infinite novelty, according to his theory of fractal time which is based on the I-Ching.

      Think I'll post this one anonymously. Don't want to explain how I know this.

    9. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be afraid to say that you are a fan of DiMethyl Tryptamine, afterall your body produces it naturally.

    10. Re:Hmm by packeteer · · Score: 2

      Your body does not produce it naturally. It is found in 99% of all dead bodies though. Its also fatal if inhaled.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    11. Re:Hmm by armyturtle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thanks to this last post, I have spent the last 2 hours reading about Terrance McKenna and the mayan calender. I must first tell you that I had no previous of Terrance or the mayan calender, nor did I have any interest (or so I thought) in these types of things.

      It's just amazing the things that open doors in our minds. The little door in my mind that was opened led to a HUGE GAPING VALLEY waiting to be filled with a new area of knowledge/information.

      I can't believe how much I've learned in just under 2 hours also. I now know not only who Terrance McKenna was, but where he grew up, where he went to for school (Graduated HS in Los Altos and studied under a newer self-directed and eclectic reading type of degree program at UC Berkeley), where he traveled to, why, and where and how he past away.

      If any of you do not know who this man was, PLEASE, I beg of you to at least read for 20 minutes about the guy. Some great (AND PROVOCATIVE) ideas! I sure wish I knew some intellectual/techie/cool people near where I live to discuss such matters with! I'm sure I have A LOT to learn.

      And BTW... I'm CONVINCED I NEED to try 'shrooms at some point in my life... if even just one time. Sheet... I've never done ANY type of substance!

      To whomever that previous "ANONYMOUS COWARD" was, I'd like to thank you for giving me insight into an area I never thought I'd even care about! You can reach me@ armyturtle1@yahoo.com

      --
      Wherever you go, there you are. :D
    12. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Honestly, if you're looking for enlightenment I'd advise to stay away from shrooms and pretty much any mind altering chemicals.

      I've done lots of different recreational drugs, and they're really fun; and I've had so many incredible philosophical and technical ideas while high that I could write a book.

      The problem is that it's all garbage when you wake up the next day and see the useless crap you've written.

      Sometimes it's funny though, and some smart people have claimed to come up with ideas while hallucinating. I suspect though, that you'd have to be smart first, and then take the drugs. I just took the drugs. hee hee

      Me.

    13. Re:Hmm by happy+monday · · Score: 1

      The problem is that it's all garbage when you wake up the next day and see the useless crap you've written.

      No, it's not garbage, it's the truth. It's just that in our normal state we're all too zombiefied to realise it.

    14. Re:Hmm by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      It would be much more reasonable, to simply have a digital camera, and to turn the light on with the door closed so it could feed you a snapshot of what's in the fridge.

      I thought of that, you must have an amazingly empty fridge. And how do you look inside a pizza box to decide whether it has four slices or one? And how do you tell if the Chinees takeout was from yesterday or last thursday?

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    15. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Wouldn't the power lost to operating a camera and a screen, even for just 15 seconds, offset the minor energy lost opening the door and looking inside for yourself? Also, opening the door has another advantage:

      Noticing something stinky.

    16. Re:Hmm by Bulbor · · Score: 1

      > Yes, according to Terence Mckenna, 2012 will be
      > a time of infinite novelty

      Yes! Sex with Lt. Hoshi or Yoshi or whatever her name is!

    17. Re:Hmm by treat · · Score: 2

      Because everyone now knows that most predictions about the technology of the future will be wrong.

    18. Re:Hmm by treat · · Score: 3, Funny
      And how do you look inside a pizza box to decide whether it has four slices or one? And how do you tell if the Chinees takeout was from yesterday or last thursday?

      Xray, MRI, GC/MS. Camera logging when the item was put in the fridge.

  3. All present and accounted for -- always. by ejdmoo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great...can't skip work and go on the Duff Factory tour...

    unless I leave my cell phone at home :)

  4. My prediction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    RMS will still not have bathed.

  5. Presence by Trusty+Penfold · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All present and accounted for -- always. ...
    Family, friends and co-workers will be able to instantly see where you are,


    I think this will come much sooner and, by 2012, will be gone again once everyone realises how bloody awful it is.

    1. Re:Presence by bmetz · · Score: 5, Informative

      AT&T's mMode has this -- it's called friend finder. *IF* you want someone to see you, you add them to a list and they can look on their phone and see something to the effect of 'Bob is at the corner of Atlantic and Congress Ave.' I think it's only based on which tower you're closest too, but it's a very good start.

      --
      What did you eat today? http://www.atetoday.com/
    2. Re:Presence by archen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly my thoughts.

      My boss offered to give me a cell phone (me being the resident "computer guy"). After watching the head of maitenance for half a day with his cell phone (everyone calling with every problem ever 5 minutes) I said no thanks. Then again I'm biased because I don't like cell phones in the first place. It seems more and more like people are never "alone". I don't want phone calls when I'm driving (when I blast music so loud I doubt I'd hear it ring anyway), I don't want calls when I'm on a walk, I don't want calls when I'm eating, or out doing something. I could turn off the ringer, but then again I'd just never have it on at all if that were the case. Most of the time I'd just like my time to MYSELF.

    3. Re:Presence by stephanruby · · Score: 2
      All present and accounted for -- always. ... Family, friends and co-workers will be able to instantly see where you are,
      ------------

      I think this will come much sooner and, by 2012, will be gone again once everyone realises how bloody awful it is.
      --------

      It will never reach those two extremes. There are a couple of pilot programs out there and they are already using the metaphor of the Instant Messaging buddy list. In other words, you can make your presence known to everyone, if you wish, and you can also make yourself invisible to anyone you want to (except law enforcement).

      It will become like my cell phone. I could give out my cell phone number to everyone I know, but I don't. And I could answer every phone call I receive without even looking at my caller id, but again I don't. Please give the marketplace some credit for leaving us those choices.

    4. Re:Presence by Maskirovka · · Score: 2
      I think this will come much sooner and, by 2012, will be gone again once everyone realises how bloody awful it is.

      It won't die out, it will be banned because it will have caused trolls to lynched in record numbers, pushing them to the brink of extinction.

    5. Re:Presence by Czernobog · · Score: 2, Informative

      It will not be here soon.
      It is already here and with the advent of technologies like GPRS, 3G and 4G it will become more and more common and noticeable.
      The world's armies (and especially the US one) have been funding -and up to a certain extenct using- technologies like this for years now. The technology is now "seeping" into the mobile operator business. Soon, with the help of those people, who buy,sell or store personal data (lawfully or not, eg. ad serving scum, police) this will be a much more evident reality than ever.
      Not before long we'll be living in Minority Report's world. Not fancy multimedia stuff, like "Hello Mr. Anderson, why don't you try this GAP outfit?" but as in you'll be getting SMS (or MMS or the then equivalent) as soon as you walk outside the shop and you're identified either as an existing ot a potential customer...

      --
      /. Where the truth
    6. Re:Presence by sllim · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except Law Enforcement?
      Oh... then that makes it alright.

      Screw that. That is much too Orwellian for me.

      Will the point come where if you don't have a cell phone people will assume you have something to hide?

      What if I am carrying your cell phone, does that leave me open to arrest?

      Screw all that. I am just gonna turn off all the lights, lock my front door and curl up in a little ball in a corner of my apartment until 2012. I'll poke my head out the front door and if I see my shadow back I will go.

    7. Re:Presence by iabervon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, it will be quickly subverted on a per-identity basis, so your family, friends, and co-workers will be able to instantly see where you want them to think you are. Most people will get text messages as soon as they're willing to get messages, but be able to pretend that they didn't get them for hours if desired.

    8. Re:Presence by miu · · Score: 1
      Then again I'm biased because I don't like cell phones in the first place.

      Too right. I'm waiting for some jackass with that nokia tone and the ring volume cranked up to be beat bloody with the offending phone when he lets it ring continuously in public.

      Hmm, maybe Texas will lead the way on this...

      --

      [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
    9. Re:Presence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too right. I'm waiting for some jackass with that nokia tone and the ring volume cranked up to be beat bloody with the offending phone when he lets it ring continuously in public.

      My bold prediction: In 2012, someone will have created a mobile phone that turns its ring tone down as soon as you grab into your pocket to get the phone out. The time when phones are really annoyingly loud is the short time span when the phone is removed from a pocket or handbag until the user finds the right button to accept the call.

    10. Re:Presence by Syre · · Score: 2

      I don't have as much of a problem about my friends knowing where I am as I do about the government knowing where I am.

      All this location data will be going right into Admiral Poindexter's meta-database, and you can bet that the fact that you attended that rally will figure into your government security profile...

    11. Re:Presence by Idarubicin · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Two thoughts about any potential cell phone:

      1) You don't have to answer it. (I suppose it's different if it's paid for by the boss, and you're on the clock.) By restricting circulation of the number, I almost always only receive calls that I want to get, anyway. Aside: Please, set it to vibrate so as not to annoy those around you with your cute ring tones.

      2) It's handy if you want to place an outgoing call. Late because you're stuck in traffic? Flat tire? Want to invite someone to meet you down at the pub? Going on a road trip with a group split between two cars? A cellular phone is a godsend if someone gets lost. Last night I was with a group of people helping a friend move. Her landline wasn't hooked up at the new location--a cell makes it so convenient to get pizza.

      A cellular phone should be a helpful accessory. If it's an annoyance, then it is the fault of its owner, not the phone.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  6. and the world changes/ends on Dec 21st by Bogatyr · · Score: 3

    At least according to Terence McKenna.

    1. Re:and the world changes/ends on Dec 21st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's really gonna suck. I mean... really. We've only got two Popes after the current one left as well. I guess all these predictions are coming together.

    2. Re:and the world changes/ends on Dec 21st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the way he quotes himself.

    3. Re:and the world changes/ends on Dec 21st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ray Kurzweil predicts that intelligence will break out from its organic roots in the not so distant future.

      Maybe the luddites had some good points?

    4. Re:and the world changes/ends on Dec 21st by szort · · Score: 0

      Maybe Ray Kurzweil is a nutcase.

    5. Re:and the world changes/ends on Dec 21st by madsenj37 · · Score: 1

      According to the Mayan calendar, something significant will happen and change the world as we know it. Some say it is the end of the world (T. McKenna for instance), and others feel it will be a turning point for technology, perhaps turning on us. What ever it is, one thing is for sure, the Mayan calendar has never been wrong before.

      --
      Choosing the lesser of two evils is a choice for evil.
    6. Re:and the world changes/ends on Dec 21st by MoceanWorker · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      i'm not sure if i would trust a person who has a link to a bunch of psychadelic substances on his website to say something as facetious as that..

      --


      "The ones who dont do anything are always the ones who try to pull you down" -- Henry Rollins
    7. Re:and the world changes/ends on Dec 21st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes he certainly seems like he could be one. He thinks that he has Ramona in him and is one of the Alcor guys.

      However, he does write well and because of this he can be convincing.

      Its interesting that a few people are predicting some sort of exponential growth in technology that changes our view of ourselves.

      Most likley we'll be paying more taxes, working more hours and living in smaller hovels with less and less privacy.

    8. Re:and the world changes/ends on Dec 21st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BlueHoney is a psychadelic 'shroom haven.

    9. Re:and the world changes/ends on Dec 21st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And some people just think it's just where they plotted their calendar out to. It'd be like if I sat down and wrote out a calendar, and after a few thousand years just decide that was where I would stop. If people lasted longer, they could just extend it.

    10. Re:and the world changes/ends on Dec 21st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the fact that the Mayans happened to plot their calendar around the stars has hippie astrologists going nuts.

      It ends in 2012 for a very definite reason. Whether that reason has any significance is hard to say.

    11. Re:and the world changes/ends on Dec 21st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It ends in 2012 because that's the end of that great cycle. Think of it was their own Y2K problem. The date field wasn't made any bigger because it didn't have to be.

    12. Re:and the world changes/ends on Dec 21st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      intelligence will break out from its organic roots in the not so distant future.
      Funny, if I'm taking that the right way, I was thinking along those lines awhile back. I was taking a nice long walk, thinking about things as I generally do, when I observed the life around me, and came to the conclusion that every living thing is wise beyond years. Think of all the chemical reactions going on inside of you right now. Is that not intelligence? When you think about it, doesn't it just blow your puny mind? And yet, you do it. Somehow. Your body knows what it's doing. Somehow. Everything does it. And yet our consciousness is so stupid. Why is everything so unaware, yet so goddamned smart?
  7. only 1 terabyte ?? by SpiritC · · Score: 3, Interesting

    from the longhorn story earlier:
    "Enderle said the new file system will also function efficiently with hard drives holding at least one terabyte of data. That's 1,000 gigabytes, or well over 1,000 compressed movies, or more than 700,000 novels the size of "War and Peace." Such drives are expected to hit the market by 2004."
    i hope 8 years more can give a couple more megs to hds ;)

    --
    Smile... tomorrow will be worse.
    1. Re:only 1 terabyte ?? by Orne · · Score: 5, Funny

      1 terabyte should be enough for anyone...

    2. Re:only 1 terabyte ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure that is what people said 10 years ago! about smaller drives...

    3. Re:only 1 terabyte ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with the introduction of 1 terabyte hard drives, keyboards will have sperm protection by default

    4. Re:only 1 terabyte ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 terrabyte isn't enough for me today -- in ten years 1 terrabyte couldn't fill a thimble worth of my storage needs.
      Full DVD Rips that aren't lossilly converted to DivX (real men don't re-encode from lossy formats) aren't a small footprint. Although honestly an 80 GB write-once optical media would make 1 terrabyte livable, at least until a Truely HD optical playback format come into play.

    5. Re:only 1 terabyte ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GOOD JOB GETTING THE JOKE, EINSTEIN

      now i get to add lots of lowercase text to make slashdot like my post so i can post it to make fun of your ignorance and complete obliviousness this might be enough time to check by pressing the button

    6. Re:only 1 terabyte ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch as the saliva from her tongue fills the anal wrinkles of her female friend.

    7. Re:only 1 terabyte ?? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      That's 1,000 gigabytes, or well over 1,000 compressed movies, or more than 700,000 novels the size of "War and Peace." Such drives are expected to hit the market by 2004." i hope 8 years more can give a couple more megs to hds ;)

      2004, 1 T drives. 2008, 1000 T drives. 2012, corporate America wins the election, institutes $1/gig media tax, average drive space drops back to 1 T (don't forget inflation).

    8. Re:only 1 terabyte ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought 640k would be enough for anyone (bill gates circa ~1984)

    9. Re:only 1 terabyte ?? by MikeFM · · Score: 2

      Damn I have more than a terabyte of storage at home now and it's 99% full. Everytime I add space I soon fill it without effort. If I still had a highspeed Internet connection it'd be even worse. Still the space required and expense of hdd's is slim compared to all this stuff on the original cd's, dvd's, etc. This way I can access all my media and not hafta find shelve space for it all. It really gives me a good excuse to geek out with customized indexing tools too.

      I predict by 2012 my home storage will exceed the capacity and indexing of what Google, at that time, has. I also predict that my server space will far exceed my living space at that point. Ahhhhh.. the sweet smell of data.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  8. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  9. ~bv~ ROFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey now, only one bottle broke. I salved the other 11 just an hour ago. :)

  10. I predict... by packeteer · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...FLYING CARS!!!

    --
    unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    1. Re:I predict... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would YOU do for the flying car?

    2. Re:I predict... by rocket97 · · Score: 0

      don't forget "Mr. Fusion"

      --
      "The two most abundant elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity." -Harlan Ellison
    3. Re:I predict... by randmairs · · Score: 2, Funny

      In 2012, I predict that I will be in my Flying Car listening to my satellite radio when my speech recognition computer picks up the tune "Fly me to the Moon" and will get ticketed by NASA, the FAA, and a dozen State Troopers.

      PS My Flying Car will be a fuel celled vehicle and the gas station will serve nothing but hydrogen.

  11. Speech Recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The question is how sophisticated our voice recognition will be in 2012. Asking a car how far away a destination is really isn't that hard, and that is only a few years off. To me this just seems like a beefed up command line interpreter-- albeit alot more user friendly. But is that really true voice recognition? Shouldn't voice recognition imply that the computer can pass the turing test? If that's the case, I think that we are a long way off from computers that we can actually communicate with like human beings.

    1. Re:Speech Recognition by Tumbleweed · · Score: 3, Funny

      No way, you'll say, "computer", not "car". You wouldn't be speaking to the car, but to a computer. Like in Star Trek, they call it 'computer,' and not 'ship.' ;)

      Either that, or you'll give your car's computer a name and use that. "Chitty, give me directions to the nearest movie theatre."

    2. Re:Speech Recognition by LostCluster · · Score: 2

      That is one problem Star Trek never fully explained away... how the ship's computer knew it was being addressed rather than the character asking the question of another person in the room. Frequenly, the character would address it as "Computer", but far too often that command was skipped and it still worked.

    3. Re:Speech Recognition by digitalsushi · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nah, when they spoke to the computer, it was always much louder, and if they were alone in the room, always rhetorical.

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    4. Re:Speech Recognition by marcsiry · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The characters, in the interest of drama, usually furrowed their brows, looked up at no one in particular, and assumed a deeper, "commanding" tone to their voice when addressing the computer.

      Perhaps the computer uses a recognition algorithm based on all these factors to know when someon is talking to "it." My cat apparently has similar algorithms programmed in- I can speak in a conversational tone all day, even to a telephone, and the cat won't respond- but the moment I assume my "talking to kitty" voice, it snaps to attention.

      Another interesting question about the ST computer- how did it route the person-to-person commnications before the individual spoke the receipient's name? You'd often here Picard's communicator pipe up: "Riker to Picard- you should come up to the bridge," or some such line.

      One presumes that the communication did not go to everyone on the ship, only to be cut off when the word "Picard" was spoken. I always assumed the computer cached the outgoing communication until it was determined whom it was going to, and then retransmitted; the result should be a 1 second lag on the return to represent that, unless the computer subtly timeshifted the entire conversation to pad the lag into the spaces normally between words.

      --
      Marc Siry || interactive media professional, motorcycle enthusiast ||
    5. Re:Speech Recognition by BitHive · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What does speech recognition have to do with the Turing test? I will consider speech recognition to be a solved problem when computers can take dictation with the same error rate as a native speaker. They don't have to be able to understand what is said--that's a different problem altogether.

    6. Re:Speech Recognition by bmetz · · Score: 2

      You are very wrong -- limited domain natural language technology exists right now in real deployed situations. The trick is narrowing the domain. Obviously, your car wouldn't be able to tell you what the meaning of life is or what kind of mutual fund you should diversify into. But questions like the one in the article -- sure, we can do this TODAY. Putting it into an embedded environment is just an exercise in moore's law.

      --
      What did you eat today? http://www.atetoday.com/
    7. Re:Speech Recognition by autopr0n · · Score: 2

      Isn't it obvoius?

      "Riker to Picard- you should come up to the bridge,"

      The computer just waits untill it hears 'picard' and then sends the message with a lag. The real question is what happens if two people have the same name...

      As far as the computer, well, we could always tell when they were talking to it, and in 400 years a computer would probably be at least as sensitive to contextual cues as a person.

      I mean at the very least the computer should be able to interact as well as any character on the holodec.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    8. Re:Speech Recognition by ActiveSX · · Score: 5, Funny

      how did it route the person-to-person commnications before the individual spoke the receipient's name?

      Ahh, this is an easy one:
      IT WAS WRITTEN THAT WAY IN THE SCRIPT.

    9. Re:Speech Recognition by LostCluster · · Score: 2

      While we're at it... how did it route "Picard to Crusher", was that Dr. Crusher, or her son? Both with authorized to be on the bridge, and both had frequent contact with the man... yet the computer would never mis-route a communication to the wrong one.

    10. Re:Speech Recognition by stephanruby · · Score: 2
      I can see it happening to some extent - I mean, the algorithms used are really unreliable, but given time, I can see it becoming usable.

      The best tools we have right now for doing speech recognition are neural networks. Neural networks are not algorithms.

    11. Re:Speech Recognition by Delphix · · Score: 5, Funny

      After our semi-intelligent voice recognition car breaks down on the side of the road:

      Driver: "This car is a piece of shit!"
      Car: "The nearest restroom is 200 miles down route 54."
      Driver : "God I hate this car, I want to kick it's ass."
      Car: "The nearest brothel is located 4,364 miles away in the state of of Nevada."
      Driver: "That's it, I've had enough of this you fucking car. I'm going to kill you!"
      Car: "Security system activated. Electrifiying body frame."
      Driver: Bzzwaaaarrrrrrzzzwaaaaaaaaaaa

    12. Re:Speech Recognition by Tim+Doran · · Score: 2

      My cat apparently has similar algorithms programmed in- I can speak in a conversational tone all day, even to a telephone, and the cat won't respond- but the moment I assume my "talking to kitty" voice, it snaps to attention.

      My kids are exactly the same, except when I assume my "talking to the kids" voice, they tune me right the heck out.

    13. Re:Speech Recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not true. Understanding the text allows you to gain better precision with transcribing it. Computers are lacking this, unless there is huge jump forward in language modelling, this is not going to happen. It is similar like you trying to transcribe Chinese - if you do not understand, what is being said, you will have a big trouble. You could learn, that this sound is that character, but that will give you the precision of the speech recognizer we have today ...

    14. Re:Speech Recognition by iabervon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Complete speech recognition will be killed in user testing, where it will turn out that people do much better with a shorthand than with complete sentences. You'll probably press a button to get it to listen to you, because buttons are much more accurate. You'll probably say "map", have it repeat it back (so you know it's understood which system you want to use), and then say "nearest gas station", and it will give directions.

      Speech recognition will be used in combination with a couple of buttons, because it will never get better than 87% accuracy on novel requests, so you'll press a button to start, speak, listen to what it now intends to do, and press a button to have it do it. 5% of the time, you'll just dial the phone yourself.

    15. Re:Speech Recognition by Louis+Savain · · Score: 2

      From the article:
      Driving alone down an unfamiliar interstate, it won't seem to odd to say, ``Car, how far to the next gas station?'' and for the car to reply ``Eight miles ahead at exit 37, there is a Chevron and a Union 76.'' .

      Any car that can understand human speech will be smart enough to drive itself around. A more likely scenario will be:

      Human:
      Car, take me to work.

      Car:
      It's only 8 AM, Sir/Maam. Do you want to stop for coffee and donuts on the way?

      But then again, if all computers were that smart, I doubt that you'd have a job in the first place.

    16. Re:Speech Recognition by rjamestaylor · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Your kids and mine, man, your kids and mine.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    17. Re:Speech Recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will be valid english with a limited vocabulary yes, I doubt it will look incoherent though.

    18. Re:Speech Recognition by istartedi · · Score: 2

      This is not too hard.

      1. Riker taps communicator badge and says $route which in the example is "Riker to Picard" followed by $opening, which in your example is "you should come to the bridge".

      2. The computer analyzes $route and opens an appropriate channel. $route can also be a group that the computer is aware of such as "away team". There is a delay equal to the duration of the $route utterance, but after that there is no more delay.

      3. The channel is open and the receiver hears $route and $opening.

      4. Now a channel is established, so no further delay is required until $cutoff which is something like "Picard out". The computer just eavesdrops waiting for $(crew | group) "out" so it can free up the channel.

      Of course they communicate through subspace, or maybe green space, or plaid tuti-fruti chocolate pie space so there is very little propogation delay, since the speed of light through that space is millions of times greater than the speed of light through ordinary space.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    19. Re:Speech Recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      While it's interesting to break the concepts in two (recognition and understanding), it's miguided. Often merely understanding what is said (ie. converting the sounds into raw words) is done contextually by the human brain. Like any good pattern recognizer, it filters out the things that are technically close matches but don't mesh with the overall pattern of the meaning of the speech.

      Having a system that merely sucks up speech sound and produces statistical possibilities for word matches is easy. In fact, I'd say trivial. But that's NOT speech recognition, and it's unfortunately what you get when you divorce the technical aspect of decoding and the amorphous business of assigning 'meaning'.

    20. Re:Speech Recognition by DarkZero · · Score: 2

      AI will not be advanced enough, IMHO. You won't say "How far to nearest gas station", you will probably be more limited in how you can ask your question. It might be close to "Car, distance to gas station, nearest" or some other limited syntax.

      I've thought of this at length since I started reading more about AIML and I honestly just can't figure out what's so difficult about it. A program for a car would have a limited set of possible conversations, since all of them would apply to cars, so it should be easy to just input all of the possible variables.

      For instance, if you wanted to program it to allow as many "commands" (aliases for a command, I suppose you could say) as possible, you could just manually put them all in. For finding the nearest gas station, the program could allow "Car, find the nearest gas station", "Car, where's the nearest gas station?", "Car, direct me to the nearest gas station", etc., and all of them with extra variables so that "please" could be added in before "car", after "car", or at the end of the command. Sure, it's time consuming, but that's what the programmers would be paid for.

    21. Re:Speech Recognition by HiThere · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Another interesting question about the ST computer- how did it route the person-to-person commnications before the individual spoke the receipient's name? You'd often here Picard's communicator pipe up: "Riker to Picard- you should come up to the bridge," or some such line.

      That one's easy. They do it the same way that you do, they have a time delay loop where things that haven't been processed are buffered, and they don't start forwarding the message until enough has been parsed to identify the recipient. They may also compress whitespace during catchup so that it doesn't even add any delay into the process. (Whitespace compression during speech can usually recover over 25% of the used time, so catchup would be trivial on any except the shortest messages [where it wouldn't matter anyway].)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    22. Re:Speech Recognition by HiThere · · Score: 2

      That's not clear at all. The car might not have the internal information to answer your questions about mutual funds, etc., but it should be able to recognize that the question was outside it's domain of expertise, and to forward it to a module that would decide where expertise about that topic could be found, and forward the message to there for processing. This could then be returned to the carso that it could reply. If significant delay is encountered during the process, the car should say "Let me think about that for a minute." Or some such.

      Remember that the expertise of a networked system doesn't need to reside locally.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    23. Re:Speech Recognition by etxjrh · · Score: 2, Funny

      It did, they just cut those bits ;)

    24. Re:Speech Recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      how the ship's computer knew it was being addressed

      In some of Larry Niven's books, voice commands to the computer are prefixed with prikazyvat (Russian for 'command'). This acts like a delimiter, since it's not a word that comes up in everyday English speech.

    25. Re:Speech Recognition by targo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What does speech recognition have to do with the Turing test?

      Proper speech recognition has been proven to be AI-complete, similar to "The Vision Problem" (building a system that can see as well as a human), and many others. Perhaps not proven as rigorously as mathematical theorems but all data is pointing this way.
      Therefore, correctly solving the speech recognition problem is equivalent to solving the Turing test. So if anybody predicts good speech recognition in some near future, it is usually a sign of uninformedness and that person probably shouldn't be taken seriously.

    26. Re:Speech Recognition by ShooterNeo · · Score: 2

      Perhaps when the $route resolves to multiple receipients (like Riker to Crusher or "Picard to crew") all receive the message. Presumably there is some spam protection, though, or you could say "me to everyone" and the system would spam everyone with my message.

    27. Re:Speech Recognition by konquered · · Score: 1

      "They don't have to be able to understand what is said--that's a different problem altogether." Actually, it seems to me that speech recognition and speech understanding are part of the same problem. Today, SR systems are quite good at creating grammatically correct sentences from speech. The fact is that in many cases, the same syllables can translate to many correct sentences and you need the context to make a choice. That's where your computer kind of needs to be aware of subject of conversation.

    28. Re:Speech Recognition by gnarled · · Score: 1

      I have actually observed that when people do things such as tell a voice activated navigation system in a car, or use Via Voice, they use a completely different tone and mannerism. They pause between words in a different pattern then they would normally too.

      --
      I'm a firm believer in the philosophy of a ruling class. Especially since I rule. -Randal, Clerks
    29. Re:Speech Recognition by kindofblue · · Score: 1
      What you describe is basically what is done for Command-and-Control speech systems. Grammars are built that try to describe all the possible ways that a user might say something. The problem is that it is very difficult to try to predict all the ways that people say things. Transcripts of people making commands can help, but there will still be lots of misses. e.g. "(I need gas)|(I'm outta gas)|(The tank is (almost)? dry|empty). (Where do I get some)|(Where's the closest station|Shell|Amoco)?" The choices multiply quickly, so today, you still need some help from the person to keep it simple and predictable.

      It's especially difficult because people fragment their sentences, use pronouns (to refer to previous sentence fragments), use pauses, corrections, etc. and the grammar has to accomodate that, in most of today's systems. The more ways that the computer has to deal with, the harder it is to recognize, and the worse the accuracy.

    30. Re:Speech Recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...They don't have to be able to understand what is said ... So if I want to go to the mall with two girls after having too much to drink then the computer can understand what the fsck I was saying.
      Thats too much to expect from a computer that is so cheap that Two thousand dollars seems like too much to waste on a Two bit operating system.

      While I say this these comments are close to being gammatically correct I don't see a computer or even a sane person parsing them correctly 100% of the time speech recognization versus being able to understad what the fsck was being said needs to be improved a lot.

    31. Re:Speech Recognition by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      I have something like that, already. I purchased it about 3 years ago or so, from GPS America. It's a computer inside of a container (black ovular thing), and has a microphone/speaker you speak into. You start off the sentence with "Navigator", then using a sequence of keywords you can extract information from it. I used it primarily for addresses and locations (both of which are on CD inside of it). Surprisingly, it never skipped at all! but, the technology is already here, just as you said, limited. I need to hook it back up to my car, though with all the changes that have gone on since then, it'd be kinda funny having it inside of a 1983 Camaro. (originally had it in my 1999 Neon, oh how things change)

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    32. Re:Speech Recognition by jtdubs · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is wrong, depending on your definition of "proper."

      What's AI-complete is /perfect/ speech recognition, as well as speech understanding, which is also known as "The Natural Language Problem," as long as we are both copying and pasting from link you posted.

      The reason perfect speech recognition is AI-complete is that it requires perfect speech understanding to choose between homophones (words that sound the same but have different meanings, such as to, too and two, or there, their and they're), and that problem is AI-complete.

      Of course, most humans don't have perfect speech understanding, and hence also don't have perfect speech recognition.

      Satisfactory speech recognition may indeed be as close as 2012. Maybe not, but it is possible. It has come a long way recently.

      This has nothing to do with the Turing Test, and many people are of the belief that the Turing Test is a pretty silly milestone in AI anyway as it is a poorly formed, incredibly subjective measure of intelligence.

      Passing the Turing Test is a matter of being able to fool a human into thinking you are human via a simple converstion, held with words only, sight-unseen. Some humans fail the Turing Test and some computers can already pass a limited variation of it.

      Something that is AI-Complete is believed to require human-level intelligence to solve, and is an entirely different, and likely far more complicated problem.

      Justin Dubs

    33. Re:Speech Recognition by kramer2718 · · Score: 1

      Speech recognition is actually pretty good today. Similar words can be mixed up, but a good probabilistic language model can cull out most errors. The really hard probel is natural language understanding and generation. Pro-nouns and tenses are particularly confusing, and subtle turns of phrase are often missed. Right now, the best dialogue system is being developed at the University of Rochester Computer Science Department. Currently, TRIPS works only on some toy domains, but it's being ported to real world problem, and yes, I think by 2012, there will be real spoken interaction with computers.

    34. Re:Speech Recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speech recognition will be used in combination with a couple of buttons, because it will never get better than 87% accuracy on novel requests...


      Bah, 92% is doable.

      Else, you have it right.

      [ Reply to This ]

    35. Re:Speech Recognition by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      I have what you are talking about NOW in my car... had it cince 1999.

      clarion autopc... speech recognition tied with the navigation software for it does this. granted, it only finds the approved items and couldn't fin you the "nearest" item... you had to be specific ot which one... and it could take you 300 miles out of the way if you were wrong.... no the fault of the speech system but the dummy programmers that wrote the navigation software. and the horrible quality of the maps.

      saying "trip status", volume loud", "preset 5", or other commands to control the stereo system were easy and worked well after you bought a $300.00 array microphone. and YES it worked for anyone except for those that cant speak clear english..

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    36. Re:Speech Recognition by alfaiomega · · Score: 1

      I can see it happening to some extent - I mean, the algorithms used are really unreliable, but given time, I can see it becoming usable.

      About a week ago I was temporary blind after a little accident (nothing very serious, but I had to have eyes closed and patched for few days). I was extremely irritaded when I had to ask someone who's pretty computer-illiterate (especially my-custom-Debian-system-illiterate) to download and start playing MP3 recording from some conferences, because I couldn't read and do anything useful, but I didn't want to waste time. I was talking to an intelligent person (so my words were understood better than any AI will ever do) what I want to write or click and she was telling me what was the result. It was a real pain in the ass. I can write "ls" 10 times faster than I could possibly say anything meaningful which would describe what I want to do. My conclusion: I won't ever use any speech recognition unless it's telling "Computer, please find and play me some Lawrence Lessig's speech about copyright and also check out if there's anything interesting on Slashdot while you're at it."

      --

      root@aio:~# nmap -sX -iR -p1- # Ho, ho, ho! Merry Xmas, everyone!

    37. Re:Speech Recognition by netsharc · · Score: 2

      Maybe they send the message through faster-than-light-"subspace" to arrive at the same time it was being spoken. :)

      An initial 1 second pause wouldn't hurt the conversation, I imagine Picard would only begin to receive the message after Riker says "Picard". When Riker has finished talking, a one second wait before Picard responds wouldn't be noticable, although of course not good enough for 24th century technology.

      Or perhaps there's a computer somewhere that can read Riker's mind (that he wants to contact Picard) and opens the channel appropriately - even before Riker says "Riker to Picard". We never see it, but Counseller Troi's second job is probably at the switchboard on the Enterprise, predicting who wants to talk to who and connecting them. :)

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    38. Re:Speech Recognition by Suidae · · Score: 2

      computer, select all from businesses where Lat-Long near current location and products include Sonoco 94 octane, order by price

    39. Re:Speech Recognition by Suidae · · Score: 2

      In an environmet like a car where I'm always in the same place relative to the control system, I'd much rather have a touch screen with a well designed menu system.

      Now, in my house, where I tend to move around alot, I'd like to be able to address the system by voice. Perhaps Walk into a room and adjust the light level or temperature, or change the radio staion or tv channel. That would be useful (even more so with presense detection).

    40. Re:Speech Recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that the guy who made the prediction means a more limited kind of speech recognition, judging by the example that he gives of asking your car for directions. In that example, the car only has to have a limited vocabulary and a statistical probability for each word will be good enough.

    41. Re:Speech Recognition by Suidae · · Score: 2

      The reason perfect speech recognition is AI-complete is that it requires perfect speech understanding to choose between homophones

      Can't much of that be taken care of grammaticly? Obviously grammer checkers can't be perfect (hell, most real people can't identify correct grammer), but it ought not be terribly difficult to make it close enough to be pretty damn good.

      I can't imagine wanting true natural language recognition anyway, for giving commands for something I would expect people to want brief commands with fairly rigid syntax. Like 'lights on' as opposed to 'house, its two dark inn hear, turn on the lights'

    42. Re:Speech Recognition by jtdubs · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, I believe that a perfectly correct grammar checker is just as difficult as language comprehension, but I'm truly not certain about that.

      As you said, good grammar checking isn't that difficult and can aid in the choosing of homophones as such, but is not perfect.

      This is all AFAIK. I could be horribly wrong. Definitly food for thought,

      Justin Dubs

    43. Re:Speech Recognition by red_flea · · Score: 0

      The reason perfect speech recognition is AI-complete is that it requires perfect speech understanding to choose between homophones (words that sound the same but have different meanings, such as to, too and two, or there, their and they're), and that problem is AI-complete.


      But if you extrapolate the current trend of younger kids in instant messaging, you soon won't need to worry about homophones. One word is chosen to incorrectly represent all of a single set, e.g. "did u know there house is blue to?" meaning "Did you know their house is blue too?" It may or may not be consistent with a single user and certainly not among several. On the other hand, this kind of disregard for the language may just be a quality of youth.

      Crypto involving English would be slightly strengthened by use of IM words since letter redundancy is usually reduced, maybe with a slight increase in ambiguity. Some words, like "though" and "through" are pretty wasteful with their letters, considering "tho" and "thru" do just as well. Personally, I hope these two words make it into casual business use...

    44. Re:Speech Recognition by iabervon · · Score: 2

      Sure, if you're doing something simple. If you're, say, trying to recognize people's names which you haven't trained the system on, it'll rarely be right. It's never going to do better at matching spoken names and spelled names than a telemarketer. And having 8% of your phone calls going to the wrong person from your list would get tiresome anyway.

  12. Finally, we can talk to our computers. by Sophrosyne · · Score: 5, Funny

    .....what gives? I talk to my computer all the time..I guess I'm ahead of the times.

    1. Re:Finally, we can talk to our computers. by Walterk · · Score: 1

      This is usually a big sign of advanced insanity. Please consult your local shrink.

    2. Re:Finally, we can talk to our computers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I talk to mine as well. The speech recognition isn't that bad for windows, maybe it will be out for linux by 2012.

      I want my computer to talk back to me.

    3. Re:Finally, we can talk to our computers. by weiyuent · · Score: 1

      .....what gives? I talk to my computer all the time..I guess I'm ahead of the times.

      Me too! The conversations usually go like this:

      Me: Hello, HAL do you read me, HAL?
      It: Affirmative, Dave, I read you.
      Me: Open the pod bay doors, HAL.
      It: I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.
      Me: What's the problem?
      It: I think you know what the problem is just as well as I do.
      Me: What are you talking about, HAL?
      It: This mission is too important for me to allow you to jeopardize it.
      Me: I don't know what you're talking about, HAL?
      It: I know you and Frank were planning to disconnect me, and I'm afraid that's something I cannot allow to happen.
      Me: Where the hell'd you get that idea, HAL?
      It: Dave, although you took thorough precautions in the pod against my hearing you, I could see your lips move.

    4. Re:Finally, we can talk to our computers. by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      you should get a Mac then.

      I talk to it, and Victoria High Quality talks back...

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  13. Mayan predictions for the year 2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their calendar runs out in 2012, and that means an end to the world! Yes, it's true, I heard it on Art Bell.

    1. Re:Mayan predictions for the year 2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is art bell these days? I haven't heard him for ages. My favorite was always the time traveller call in line. There were some real nutcases that called in there, but occasionally a smart seeminly coherent person would call in on their visit to the present.

    2. Re:Mayan predictions for the year 2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Retiring at the end of the year, and his replacement sucks. His name is George Noory, but "fans" call him George Snoory.

    3. Re:Mayan predictions for the year 2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's too bad he's retiring. I used to enjoy his show when I was in college and didn't sleep much. Does he still have the time traveller call-in line?

    4. Re:Mayan predictions for the year 2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On rare occasions, but he so rarely hosts anymore even now (3 times a week is about his max). His recent focus has been on "shadow people" so he more often has a call-in line for people who have seen them.

  14. This sounds familiar by Huw · · Score: 1
    You'll no longer be surprised to get a call from the repair center at Sears or Maytag saying your washing machine is using too much hot water and needs adjustment -- information the washing machine has sent through the Net, without any action of your part, back to the factory where it was built.


    Sounds familiar. A friend's Dad used to be a minion tending to the needs of a mainframe in the south east of England many years back. Apparently it wasn't unheard of for an HP engineer to walk in through the door and announce that he'd come to replace a processor without the admin even being aware that a processor had died.
    --

    --
    Windows XP. From the people who brought you Edlin.
    1. Re:This sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Hell, I'd be suprised if Sears or Maytag even *took* my service calls...

      I this he's saying that 2012 will be the return of that historical notion called "customer service". I'm looking forward to it!

  15. Same old by KimmoKe · · Score: 2, Informative

    I could write those predictions. Actually most science and technology magazines have already printed similiar predictions for years now. If I type something BOLD like that also, will it get posted on Slashdot too?

  16. In the year 2012 by LordOfYourPants · · Score: 4, Funny

    In the year 2012:

    Junis will upgrade to a 386

    Jon Katz II begins writing articles for slashdot. His premiere article: What caused Columbine to happen II? A 37-part epic.

    Stephen King and Alan Thicke will still be dying on a daily basis, missed by all.

    The goatse.cx hole will increase in radius by 3m.

    The (meta)-moderation system will still be broken.

    E-paper will be coming out "real soon now"

    The "How about a beowulf cluster of these?" joke finally gets played out.

    Mozilla supports yenc decoding.

    1. Re:In the year 2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot a couple:
      Duke Nukem Forever will be released.
      Gnu/Hurd will still be useless.

    2. Re:In the year 2012 by archen · · Score: 1

      BSD: Still dying, still not dead :)

    3. Re:In the year 2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and *BSD will have been dying for the past 14 years

    4. Re:In the year 2012 by GigsVT · · Score: 2

      When Alan Thicke or Stephen King really does die, will Slashdot run a story? :)

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    5. Re:In the year 2012 by Salsaman · · Score: 2

      Who's Junis ? Is she hot ?

    6. Re:In the year 2012 by stwrtpj · · Score: 3, Funny
      The "How about a beowulf cluster of these?" joke finally gets played out.

      But the "all your base are belong to us" variations will still be going.

      --
      Karma: Frotzed (mostly due to the Frobozz Magic Karma Company)
    7. Re:In the year 2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      ..and, if so, will everyone complain because its already been posted?

    8. Re:In the year 2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was that supposed correspondant in a Jon Katz article that supposedly communicated from Kabul with email on his commodore 64.

  17. All of those things listed by Soporific · · Score: 1

    Would be pretty cool if they were actually implemented. The RFID tags and GPS things seem to be the most promising. Inventory taking would be painless and hopefully lead to lower prices. Who knows though? Only time will tell. They just need to invent a car that can drive me home from the bar on autopilot and then I will be thoroughly happy.

    ~S

    1. Re:All of those things listed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, lower prices and massive unemployment. Sounds good.

    2. Re:All of those things listed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Inventory with RFID is already being done in a significant scale, so it's almost a safe bet. The payment thingie though (credit card with a built-in RFID) is pure SF, I'd say. Not because of technical reasons, but because it will take forever for anyone to dare to take financial risk for that type of transactions.

      Now we have "war driving", but I guess "war walking" would become (or be feared as) the way the pickpockets would operate. :-)

  18. Nonono, he's got it all wrong! by Freston+Youseff · · Score: 3, Funny

    In the year two-thousand and twelve, we will have inexhaustable electricity sources, flying cars, commercial zeppelin transports, jetpacks, a non-crashable Microsoft Operating system and of course SPAM(TM) that is edible.

    --

    1. Re:Nonono, he's got it all wrong! by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 5, Funny

      And every Slashdotter will have a lady.

      Riiiight...whatever.....

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    2. Re:Nonono, he's got it all wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this sets a precident! A Slashdot reader said that Microsoft will come out with a good product...

      Sadly, this implies that the universe is coming to an end NOW, so there won't be a 2012.

    3. Re:Nonono, he's got it all wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And every Slashdotter will have a lady."

      Won't you please contribute to the Slashdotter Libido Support Fund? For the price of a cup of coffee you can provide vital care to lonely individuals by sending them lipstick, a wig, and a miniature dress for their right hands.

    4. Re:Nonono, he's got it all wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Expecially the lesbians.

    5. Re:Nonono, he's got it all wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, every lady has a slashdotter!

    6. Re:Nonono, he's got it all wrong! by Tingler · · Score: 1

      Easy Payment Plans!

      http://www.realdoll.com/

    7. Re:Nonono, he's got it all wrong! by octalc0de · · Score: 1

      No, they only take up-front cash. Easy Payment Plans, my ass! *walks into bank*

      Me: I'd like a loan for $4,000.
      Teller: What For?
      Me: I gotta buy meself one of those sex dolls!

      riggggggggggggggght. rigggggggggggggggght.

  19. moving sidewalks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    They've always been promising us moving sidewalks. Why can't They keep their promises?

    1. Re:moving sidewalks by stephanruby · · Score: 2

      Some airports and some commercial areas have outdoor moving sidewalks. Because of the guardrails, they look like flat escalators, but with the legal atmosphere here -- I don't see those handrails going away anytime soon.

    2. Re:moving sidewalks by saskboy · · Score: 2

      The only moving sidewalk I've seen is underneath the tarmac at Toronto Pierson Airport, and if they weren't there then you'd have to walk a helluva distance to get to your planes for domestic flights.
      They are so cool, and I wish more places had them.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    3. Re:moving sidewalks by nickclarke · · Score: 0

      they have them at Gatwick (LGW), and as far as I can tell, they literally are flat escalators

  20. Speech Recognition by Raul654 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can see it happening to some extent - I mean, the algorithms used are really unreliable, but given time, I can see it becoming usable. However, I take issue with the way he think it will be presented. AI will not be advanced enough, IMHO. You won't say "How far to nearest gas station", you will probably be more limited in how you can ask your question. It might be close to "Car, distance to gas station, nearest" or some other limited syntax. I preface it with 'car' because you have to have some way to let the car know the question is directed at it.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  21. 2012!!! The Future is here... by Droz1313 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unfortunatly, Duke Nukem Forever was cancelled again in 2011....

  22. They are moving already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The Earth is rotating as well as moving through space, right? So, I say moving sidewalks are already everywhere! A stationary sidewalk will be the real development.

    1. Re:They are moving already by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      the Earth COULD be completely stationary and everything else spinning around us.

      you've got to admit it's POSSIBLE

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    2. Re:They are moving already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it is - in fact it's a meaningless distinction. It's just a question of choosing the correct reference frame. Now, assuming the earth stationary makes your reference frame non-inertial, but that just makes the relativistic equations agonisingly complicated to solve, not physically impossible.

  23. I predict that... by Mononoke · · Score: 1
    In the year 2012, beleaguered Apple Computer will be at death's door, ripe for purchase by Disney/Sony/etc.

    ( I just wanted to be the first to make this prediction for this particular year.)

    --
    NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
  24. RFID by ciryon · · Score: 2

    One of the more probable and interesting technologies is Radio Frequency ID. Many people think it'll replace barcodes within some years, but I think many people (because of lack of knowledge) will be sceptic. We're hearing so much talk today allready of mobile phones and wireless networks being "dangerous" in different ways.

    Ciryon

    1. Re:RFID by redfiche · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Winona Ryder is looking forward to RFIDs at Nordstrom's.

      --

      Brevity is the soul of wit

      -- Polonius

    2. Re:RFID by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      just don't walk to close to the door with something you don't want :-)

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    3. Re:RFID by ShadowDrake · · Score: 1

      The problem is that it has to become much more sophisticated than the "dumb transmitter on every device" model to give the effects described in the article. Most notably, what happens when I leave a store and return with the parcel still in my hands?

      At least, you need a "sold" flag that you can set when you leave, and only if you paid. You also need a mechanism to record purchase information (purchased 2/6/2012, price USD 399.99) for return purposes. Furthermore, what will you cut out and send in for the rebate?

      That brings me to my prediction: Any electronics device you buy in 2012 will have no less than 9 mail-in rebates applying to it.

      --
      It's just like a fascist dictatorship, without the punctual rail service!
    4. Re:RFID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be too sure.

      What do you need to use RFID? A contract with one of very few RFID manufacturers (it IS patented, right?). Proprietary hardware, maybe a licence for RF devices, etc, etc.

      What do you need to use barcodes? Paper. Ink. A scanner.

  25. Other than speech recognition by redfiche · · Score: 4, Interesting

    what on that list is impressive? He could've at least gone out on a small limb and mentioned fuel-cells.

    --

    Brevity is the soul of wit

    -- Polonius

  26. 2012 the year your computer... by Quirk · · Score: 2

    downloads a new kernel into you.

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
  27. Here's my predictions for 2012: by tmark · · Score: 5, Funny

    (drumroll please)
    5. computers will be much faster than they are today
    4. computers will be much less expensive than they are now
    3. programs will take much more space than they do now
    2. hard drive capacities will be much larger than they are now
    and finally... (drumroll please)
    1. there will be even more duped articles on Slashdot

    1. Re:Here's my predictions for 2012: by digitalsushi · · Score: 2

      I doubt that in 2012 the average person will have that box in the corner of their living room that they call the computer. "The network will be the computer". :D I also doubt we will be using hard drives in the same sense as today. But that wont matter cause there's no typical computer to store it in anyways.

      I wonder when the last remnants of slashdot will fade away... I could see it alive and kicking in 2012 to be honest with you. Not as it is, but at least in name and scope. I could see it being more elite and underground, too.

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    2. Re:Here's my predictions for 2012: by daveirl · · Score: 1

      In the year 2012 computers will be 1000 times as powerful, 1000 times larger and owned by the 5 richest kings of Europe!

      Paraphrasing Prof. Frink of course!

    3. Re:Here's my predictions for 2012: by zephc · · Score: 2

      In the corner of the living room? Mine's sitting on the floor between my legs, so I can father a gang of mutant super-children some day.

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    4. Re:Here's my predictions for 2012: by autopr0n · · Score: 2

      I could see it being more elite and underground, too.

      Well, certanly not if current trends continue! If anything /. has become much more boring and mainstream. People like alan cox and linus used to post on here, you know.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    5. Re:Here's my predictions for 2012: by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You forgot:
      • Microsoft Windows will still consume more than half of the computer's resources, even before you load any applications ... and it'll cost $10,000. (Hopefully, it won't matter because most people will have switched to Linux by 2012.)
      • Even though computers will be much more powerful, people will still generally only use them for e-mail and word processing.
      • Bill Gates announces for the sixth or seventh time since the original 1992 'Cairo' announcement, that the next version of Windows will have a database in the filesystem.
      --
      Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    6. Re:Here's my predictions for 2012: by pVoid · · Score: 2
      Even though computers will be much more powerful

      I don't know about that. If you look at current trends, major chip makers (AMD - there was a article on ./ but I'm too lazy to look it up) aren't going to be putting that much R&D into consumer end computers anymore...

      I'm actually using a computer that's 4 years old now, and all I've *needed* up till now were RAM, hdd, and vid card upgrades, I wouldn't be surprised if the next system I buy lasts me 10 years.

      (btw, for the sceptics: I have a dual PIII 500, w/ 1 Gb of ram)

    7. Re:Here's my predictions for 2012: by Da+Masta · · Score: 2

      I was about to laugh at you when I realized I'd probably have to do that too, if I dont get a woman by 2012. ;-)

    8. Re:Here's my predictions for 2012: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft Windows will still consume more than half of the computer's resources, even before you load any applications ... and it'll cost $10,000.

      I predict it will cost a million billion ho-jillion dollars! That ought to be worth at least a +5 Insightful!

      I also predict it will use ALL the computer's resources, before it is even installed! Oh, I am the astute social critic!

    9. Re:Here's my predictions for 2012: by stwrtpj · · Score: 2

      Another prediction: Someone named Phil will come up with an even better free UNIX-like OS that he'll call Philix, and RMS will argue that it should be called GNU/Philix.

      Oh, that and GNU/* joke variations intended to garner a cheap laugh (like this one) will finally die out.

      --
      Karma: Frotzed (mostly due to the Frobozz Magic Karma Company)
    10. Re:Here's my predictions for 2012: by roguerez · · Score: 2

      You're making a big mistake. Doom III will be out next year..

  28. Hooray for RFID! by autopr0n · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If nothing else, RFID could have spared Winona Ryder her recent and very embarrassing shoplifting arrest.

    I'll say, just stick your in a conductive bag and they'll never know.

    erhaps Frits Hollings will introduce the CRFIDTPA which will illegalize bags and pouches made from electrically conductive material.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  29. show in the future by digitalsushi · · Score: 2

    Anyone remember a PBS show that pretended to be a couple decades from now, reporting then current day events? I flipped in on the tail end of the show- one blurb had a couple who have never met, but got married in cyberspace, and she never wanted to meet him cause she was afraid that if she saw what he really looked like, she would be disgusted, and another blurb where a couple had a hacker controlling all of their appliances. I'm not asking if anyone else saw it so much as what were some of the other clips in that show?

    --
    slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
  30. I predict... by wneto · · Score: 1

    we will have compressed air powered cars!

    oh.. wait! nevermind... its out already

  31. Been there, done that. by Walterk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm already always online on my IM services, but always in the N/A or away state.. People never know if I'm actually there, unless I talk back. I'm omnipresent, just not an accountant.. or something.

  32. Hopefully wrong.. by WillRobinson · · Score: 5, Funny

    The car: You should not have to ask how far it is to the next gas station. The car knows how much gas you have, how many miles to the next station, and your gas millage, maybe even the terrain. It should be more like:
    Hal: John, I have determined you should not have passed that last station, maybe you should turn around now.
    Hal: John, you have two miles more before the point of no return to that gas station you passed.
    Hal: John, are you listening to me?
    John: Shut UP! You dont know i have a gas can in the trunk!
    Hal: John, yes you do, but its empty! Remember last time?
    John: Nag, Nag Nag..

  33. my prediction...life will still suck by havaloc · · Score: 2

    See subject. Life's still going to suck. The planet is still going to be overrun with idiots.

    1. Re:my prediction...life will still suck by digitalsushi · · Score: 2

      Life's gonna suck more, once people start getting addicted to virtual reality- a digital escape that will take some portion of people with addictive personalities, and mess their lifes up quite nicely. "Hey Bobby, you sure seem depressed- why don't you slip this helmet on each and every night for the rest of your life right after you get home from work? Heck... that job's just slowing you down come to think. These little babies are solar powered anyways. Hey, just don't forget to unplug and eat every 12 hours, ok there kiddo?"

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    2. Re:my prediction...life will still suck by kliment · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of this short story by Terry Pratchett...about a life where virtual reality is everywhere, and everyone wears those helmets, filtering out ads, smog, annoying relatives... was a good one with a cryptic name, can't remember exactly...

    3. Re:my prediction...life will still suck by ChiPHeaD23 · · Score: 1

      Life's gonna suck more, once people start getting addicted to virtual reality- a digital escape that will take some portion of people with addictive personalities, and mess their lifes up quite nicely.

      Isn't this what that EverQuest thing does? The future is now, baby!

    4. Re:my prediction...life will still suck by Yurian · · Score: 2
      I think the story your thinking of is

      #ifdefDEBUG + 'world/enough' + 'time' (funky title!)

      I've heard about it, and I'd really like to read it. Happen to remember where you found it?

      Thanks.

    5. Re:my prediction...life will still suck by kliment · · Score: 1

      a short story collection called, if I recall correctly, cybercrime, or something among those lines. Look it up, I found it accidentally from the library

  34. A Few More Predictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft will release an OS without bugs, that "all your base are belong to us" joke will get old, and pigs will fly. Wait. Was that 2012? Oh, I thought it said 2102.

    1. Re:A Few More Predictions by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      MS won't exist in 2012 let alone 2102...

      --
      Luke-Jr
  35. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    No, you fool! It's "In Soviet Russia, technology predictions put up Mike Langberg!"

    People like you give Soviet Russia a bad name.

    Well, OK, it's mostly the people like Stalin who do that, but still....

  36. TV commercials by maunleon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Except for special events such as the Super Bowl and the Academy Awards, no one will watch TV shows at the time they are transmitted, and conventional 30-second commercials will be rare because advertisers won't pay when most viewers can hit the fast-forward button. Major broadcast networks and traditional prime-time programming will be fading, with most entertainment sold
    through either a monthly subscription or a pay-per-view fee.


    I would guess it is also possible for networks to start doing what they do during soccer games when they can't take breaks -- scroll the add on top of the programming. You could be watching Friends, with a little "Pampers" ad on the bottom. This would allow for even more commercial time, and they could sell the time to sync to various moments in a program. (e.g Rachel is playing with the baby, roll the Pampers ad. They are in the coffeehouse, roll the Starbucks ad)

    Another thing that can happen is a'la sports programming. At various times during the program, the picture would shrink, making enough space for an ad to be displayed alongside. Some people will put up with this if it means free, and you can't skip the commercials.

    See, aren't ya'll glad I'm not a network exec. :)

    If it goes away, good riddance. They have to be careful with subscription fees.. commercial TV is mostly crap, so it is hard to price it correctly. All my local stations together would probably be worth about $7/mo to me if they were to be commercial free. Can they make money with that?

    1. Re:TV commercials by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Haha. Not very bright, are you?

      I have no trouble imagining it possible to hack my Tivo Series VI to automatically crop out crud like that, and stretch the picture back to normal.

      And if they try to superimpose it on the video feed itself, it might even be possible to train a neural net to "rebuild" it with some degree of accuracy.

      Technology is finally on our side for once, as opposed to the hordes of spam minions.

    2. Re:TV commercials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope pay tv never happens.

      In Australia cable/pay tv is crap and has more adds than free to air. Free to air has all the best shows, movies and sports. And because of our anti syphoning laws, they can't take sports off free to air.

    3. Re:TV commercials by maunleon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, yeah, you are brilliant. What you are saying is that you can create a software piece that analyses a video feed in real time, and determines what needs to be cropped out. Then, it magnifies whatever's left over without a loss in quality.. Your cool software can determine what is part of the real feed and what the ad is.

      oh, and furthermore, you would even analyse a video feed for superimposed advertising. And magically reconstitue the image under the ad. Or do you prefer a white box with a little red [x] in the corner, on your video feed?

      And the piece of resistance is... you will be doing all this magic stuff on a TiVO.

      Why are you here? You should be running off and starting your dot-com. The Govt would love to see your neural net at work, they can employ it for live analyis of surveillance cameras.

      Hey, I'm not saying it's not a good idea. I don't think a TiVO has enough muscle for it, however.

    4. Re:TV commercials by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

      Didn't say loss of quality numbnuts.
      As for realtime video feed maanipulation, SGI was able to do that mid 90's, how long before a consumer class machine is capable of such?

      I used the Tivo as an example (it might be awhile, if ever before there is a 'series 6' machine). Don't imagine they'll be using the same lowly little PPC (note: the PPC arch itself isn't lwoly, just the cheap one they use in Tivos) that they do today.

      As for reconstituting hidden video, with the way most photographers shoot film/video/movies, the least important parts of the film are toward the edges, not the middle. Yes, it could easily be reconstituted to such a degree, that it doesn't look bad to the casual viewer. This is far different from it being the same as the original, mind you.

      And hell. This doesn't even have to be realtime. Duh. We are talking PVRese, here. I certainly wouldn't mind watching 30-180 seconds behind 'live', if it meant killing all the ads.

      As far as the ads themselves go, if they're 1/1000th as obnoxious as I think they'll be, there will be plenty to distinguish them from the actual video. Not to mention a discontinuity from the original feed, think about it. If one portion of the video matches closely the last non-overlapped frame, and the other part doesn't match at all, is it safe for the PVR to assume this new thing is an ad?

      [SARCASM]
      Yeh, that's real far-fetched. They won't be able to do this for at least 70-80 years, I think.
      [/SARCASM]

    5. Re:TV commercials by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1

      Here's how I see it, there will be commercials on almost all the time, the bottom 1/8th of the screen will be the 'free market zone' where local stations or advertisers can deluge you with information 24/7. (probably with an internet-tivo future it will all be targeted to YOU, or targeted to your weaknesses - CowbyoNeal detected, use the 'Cute babes dig nerds using our product pitch!') Cable channels and/or stations probably get viewer hit bonuses too - so the ads will be extra grueling or enticing as well.

      Though I also see an some exemptions for political, some news or emergency broadcasts, public television and/or educational shows (can't currupt the kids, show bad taste or political influence...).

      I also see such internet businesses as eBay, Amazon, etc. moving to the new TV with their own 'channels' either displaying items for sale ala QVC or when in 'interactive mode' similar to the websites we all know, but probably more fast paced the tuned for quick money turnover ("use buy it now! the Three Stooges Tupperware set ends in 5 minutes and there are 8 others currently viewing this selection!")

      We also will get new billing charges for system features, like Yahoo access, TV-Guide programming (sets your device to tape shows), and of course the MPAA/RIAA per play charge for anything we store and watch later (it's only a few cents, cheap!)

      Free... ha! Look at the direction broadcast TV is headed.

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    6. Re:TV commercials by DarkZero · · Score: 2

      I would guess it is also possible for networks to start doing what they do during soccer games when they can't take breaks -- scroll the add on top of the programming.

      UPN, TNT, and several other networks and cable channels already do this, despite the fact that they do it during shows that have lengthy commercial breaks. They have big, colorful, animated popups show up on the bottom of the screen.

    7. Re:TV commercials by Jack+Auf · · Score: 1

      All my local stations together would probably be worth about $7/mo to me if they were to be commercial free. Can they make money with that?

      I was listening to Harry Shearer's radio show on KCRW a few weeks ago and he read an item from a study that stated that the cost of completely commercial free tv (local stations as well as cable) would cost every cable subscriber in the country about $240 per household per year extra.

      Anybody have a url for the study?

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - BF
    8. Re:TV commercials by maunleon · · Score: 2


      "If one portion of the video matches closely the last non-overlapped frame, and the other part doesn't match at all, is it safe for the PVR to assume this new thing is an ad?"


      If you say so. ;) On the other hand, it could be just a scene change... or it could be an overlay that is really part of the feed, not the ad. Think score overlays during a game. I wouldn't want those stripped out.

    9. Re:TV commercials by Suidae · · Score: 2

      You could always watch about a minute behind the live feed, and during that minute a crew of people could use real human intelligence to use in-painting techniques to remove ads. The crew could sell the information as patches to the broadcasts to which one could subscribe for a low low montly fee, and you could cancel any time you want (various restrictions apply, check your local store for details)

    10. Re:TV commercials by Suidae · · Score: 2

      Here's how I see it, there will be commercials on almost all the time, the bottom 1/8th of the screen will be the 'free market zone' where local stations or advertisers can deluge you with information 24/7.

      I have no problem with that, many of the networks around here do that to advertise whatever is on next anyway (as if I need that, I have tvguide.com and a digital guide right on the cable box).

      What irritates me is that they resize without regard to the aspect ratio of the picture. Picard looks stupid squashed vertically by 15%. Hell, they even have the extra info in the TV cutoff area on the left and right, they could shrink the image, maintan aspect ratio, and probably still have a full width picture.

    11. Re:TV commercials by hyperturbopete · · Score: 1

      it wouldnt be that hard - most ads run in zillions of households. Each "smart" TV set could have a button similar to the "this is spam" button on yahoo mail. Have a distributed database of image-hashes (requires development of robust image hash technology, but thats about it). You get the idea.

  37. Not quite spot on by Subcarrier · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Internet is everywhere -- and nowhere.

    This will take at least 15 years. People don't buy new washing machines all that often.

    All present and accounted for -- always.

    This will be in mobile phones within 5 years.

    Walk now, pay later.

    Probably unfeasible as described. More likely you will authorize payment for the item before putting it in the bag. The receiver at the entryway will only check that you don't leave with any unpaid items. 10 years is about right, I wager.

    Prime time is your time

    Not very adventurous there. 5 more years.

    Finally, we can talk to our computers

    People curse them every day, so this is already reality. ;-)

    I doubt true voice control will be there in 10 years either, unless there is a major break through in AI technology. Before that, we will be limited to simple voice keyed activation.

    --
    "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
    1. Re:Not quite spot on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as for the phones with tracking in them... in the US, Nextel has released their i88 phone, with full GPS tracking through the use of not only satellites, but triangulation with the network towers when possible. Nice feature, and soon to be required for cell phones in the US by the emergency services people so when they get a cell phone emergency call they can find out where the person is at.

  38. RFID Shopping by Atrahasis · · Score: 1
    I don't think this one is going to work for three reasons (maybe more, but these off the toip of my head at midnight):

    Receiver fails to detect CC ID chip - customer gets hassled by security/alarms go off.

    Receiver fails to detect goods/detects wrong number. Makes stock inventory no easier, overcharging and undercharging still a problem.

    Cash sales. Some people don't have a CC a) because they can't get one (age limitations, credit problems) or b)because they don't want one.

    1. Re:RFID Shopping by autopr0n · · Score: 2

      Receiver fails to detect CC ID chip - customer gets hassled by security/alarms go off.

      Or, reciver fails to detect product ID tag. You get your stuff for free.

      Not that anyone would have a bag with an aluminum lineing or anything...

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    2. Re:RFID Shopping by overunderunderdone · · Score: 2

      Receiver fails to detect CC ID chip - customer gets hassled by security/alarms go off.

      If it is not detected how would they know to hassle you?

      However an aluminum bag (as the poster above suggests) would still not work because the RFID tag is *always* being detected by readers all over the store. Putting it in the aluminum bag makes it "disapear" from the system - which would lead to being hassled by security.

      Receiver fails to detect goods/detects wrong number. Makes stock inventory no easier, overcharging and undercharging still a problem.

      I don't know how big a problem detecting wrong numbers will be but even with such occasional problems (which happen with bar codes & humans as well) inventory will still be easier. The back wall of the shelving units will be readers that always know *exactly* what is in the store and *exactly* where it is. (They can print the reader antenna onto contact paper). The system not only knows that there are exactly 12 bottles of Cheer on a particular shelf but also that there is one moving down aisle three (in someones cart), one misplaced by a customer on the "impulse item" shelf near the checkout and one has mysteriously dissapeared when the above poster put it in an aluminum bag (the system duly notifying security). Such constant, hyper-accurate (hopefully), real-time inventory management is (one of) the real goals of the RFID tags - more convenient checkout is just an added bonus made possible by such super accurate inventory managment.

    3. Re:RFID Shopping by Atrahasis · · Score: 1
      Receiver fails to detect CC ID chip - customer gets hassled by security/alarms go off. If it is not detected how would they know to hassle you?

      Because you're walking out of the store with a bag full of products, but the system has detected no method of payment.
      Also, what happens if I forget something, and go back to get it? When I leave for the second time, do I get charged again for the stuff I've already paid for?

    4. Re:RFID Shopping by overunderunderdone · · Score: 2

      When I leave for the second time, do I get charged again for the stuff I've already paid for?

      I will conceed that the articles vision of completely getting rid of checkout lines is a bit far out but the RFID tags are a reality and they will allow for some very interesting things to happen. The checkout will probably consist of simply walking through the checkout, seeing the list of items, total & selecting a method of payment. In some situations perhaps having a bagger take your items out of the cart and put them in bags for you (which by itself resolves most of the security issues). But scanning the items & ringing them up will be gone. If you want to go back in and then out without being rung up again, don't forget your reciept and go out by the service desk to avoid getting charged.

      There are more interesting possiblities. For instance you take a microwaveable burrito out of the fridge which notes that it is now one below the set minumum number of burritos & adds burritos to it's peapod.com order for the next scheduled delivery. You stick it in the microwave & press "auto". The microwave reads the tag, gets the manufacturers recommended power-level & time off the net & zaps the burrito. To get really creepy you sit down at the TV which knows you are now out of burittos and puts up an ad for the competing brand (the high bidder on the "just ate last burrito in the fridge demographic"). You throw out the empty container which goes to the recycling plant where the tags are used to properly sort the recyclables.

      Now seeing such connectivity & automation in a typical consumer's home life is admittedly a little far fetched (though most of the things I mentioned have been done in demo's - including the bit with the hyper-targetted TV ad). However, you will likely see very similar scenarios occuring very soon throughout industry & the supply chain. Pervasive RFID allows you to extend the information revolution of the internet beyond abstract bits & bytes of information to include real physical objects. All the implications of such real-time networking of information about real objects are hard to imagine but are likely to be very significant.

  39. The one thing wrong with predictions by happyhippy · · Score: 1
    Is that they usually forget to take into account the human and business element.

    A world where everything is online? Companies will exploit it getting you to opt out of buying things from them and people will view it as a invasion of privacy.

    RFIDs on clothing? Wouldnt that make it easier for the people to steal stuff if the cashier element was eliminated? So cashiers will logically have to be turned into security guards in order to watch you. So stores become more intrusive in spying on you.

    Watch how you go TV? Unless the TV networks and studios merge into one this wont happen. You wont be able to store films as Hollywood wont allow you to (unless you bought the 2012 version of the DVD/VHS/hologram). Its more likely the TV of the future wil store what the networks think youd like ie commerically rich dumbed down shit.

    In a perfect world these would happen. In ours business and human habits affect it.

    1. Re:The one thing wrong with predictions by overunderunderdone · · Score: 2

      RFIDs on clothing? Wouldnt that make it easier for the people to steal stuff if the cashier element was eliminated?

      No because they know when an item walks out of the store withoug having been paid for. Think you'll cut the tag off? No, There is no reason for it to be somewhere you can easily do so. Put it in a metalic bag so readers can no longer detect it? No, it is constantly being read by readers around the store. The moment it goes off the net security is notified that an item has "disappeared" and exactly where it was the moment before. No need to spy on you, they aren't tracking *you* at all, they are tracking the products so closely they don't need to.

      I'm sure that the articles vision of zero checkout is a bit far out. There will be a checkout but you won't have to take your items out of the cart or basket at all, just walk through the checkout, take a quick look at the readout to check the total & list of items you're buying - select payment method & hit the approval button.

  40. Re:2012?!?! by Evil+Dead · · Score: 2, Funny

    To be more precise, it will end on Dec. 21, 2012. Even more suprising is the fact that everyone I work with finally gets our additional vacation time on...Dec 21, 2012! I think our CEO is in league with those Mayans, X-Philes, and the Aliens. We're all doomed to have the world end without getting to use our additional time! Damn aliens...

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Beowulf cluster imagines YOU!
  41. One Prediction Is Impossible by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Every cable and satellite television receiver will include a hard disk for recording shows, and those disks will have a minimum capacity of one terabyte, or 1,000 gigabytes, enough to store hundreds of hours of high-definition programming.

    Not bloody likely. HD Video is likely to require about 15 GB/hour to store. 1 TB of data does NOT give you 'hundreds of hours', more like 65 hours.

    1. Re:One Prediction Is Impossible by smithmc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not bloody likely. HD Video is likely to require about 15 GB/hour to store. 1 TB of data does NOT give you 'hundreds of hours', more like 65 hours. ...using current video codecs, that is. But what about when we're using MPEG-20 or something?

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    2. Re:One Prediction Is Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      15GB/hour? I don't think so.

    3. Re:One Prediction Is Impossible by kliment · · Score: 1

      One word: compression

      I am sure that there will be new and better compression algorithms by then, even for HD Video. Assuming that it can be packed into 1/10th of the original size, that yields, by your calculations, 650 hours, which is in the hundreds. However, I suppose the hard drives will have either evolved way beyond that size or completely diappeared to be replaced by high-capacity solid-state devices. Eventually we might see the computer-on-a-few-chips, which includes everything, and is upgradable by simple replacement of one of chips which is, of course fully compatible with the others. I also suspect mucrosoft will die by then, and so might linux, kept alive in pretty much the same way as the amiga community today. However, better operating systems will be developed, and I would bet one of them would be a linuxlike project.

    4. Re:One Prediction Is Impossible by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      You can get DVD quality with 4MBit/sec OpenDivX already... That's about 582 hours or 24 days in 1 TB...

      --
      Luke-Jr
    5. Re:One Prediction Is Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      he has the drive space wrong also considering drive space doubles every year this is how it should look
      this year we have 160GB drives
      2003 = 320GB
      2004 = 640GB
      2005 = 1280GB
      2006 = 2560GB
      2007 = 5120GB
      2008 = 10240GB
      2009 = 20480GB
      2010 = 40960GB
      2011 = 81920GB
      2012 = 163840GB

      so Harddrives will probably be 163 TB's by 2012 should be able to have a 20TB drive in every satilite receiver.

    6. Re:One Prediction Is Impossible by spacefrog · · Score: 2, Informative

      HD Video is likely to require about 15 GB/hour

      15GB/Hr UNCOMPRESSED... Sheeesh

    7. Re:One Prediction Is Impossible by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2

      4Mbit/sec??

      and what do you suppose the average data rate is on a 180 minute, 9.4GB DVD?

      and it's "DVD quality" too!

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    8. Re:One Prediction Is Impossible by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2, Informative

      not quite - SD video is >1GB a MINUTE uncompressed, HD around 6 times as much - so let's say 400GB/hour at LEAST.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    9. Re:One Prediction Is Impossible by FueledByRamen · · Score: 1

      By SD video, I assume that you mean 640x480x30fps? A few calculations (assuming 1 byte pixels): 640 x 480 = 307,200 x 30fps = 9,216,000 bytes/sec x 60 sec = 552,960,000 bytes (527 MB, where 1 MB = 1048576 bytes). Obviously it'd be more than a gig if you recoded in 16bit RGB, but who needs that when you have YUY2 4:2:0 or YUV2 4:2:2? Add another 176,400 bytes/sec for 44khz 16bit stereo PCM, or 10,584,000 bytes for a minute. Still not anywhere near 1GB/min as you stated.

      When you were thinking SD, did you assume 60fps? NTSC standard is 60 fields/sec, but each field only contains every other line (interlaced), so it becomes 30 frames per second.

      --
      Every cloud has a silver lining (except for the mushroom shaped ones, which have a lining of Iridium & Strontium 90)
    10. Re:One Prediction Is Impossible by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 2

      No, 15 GB/HR with MPEG2 VBR Compression.
      HD Uncompressed would be 250GB+ per hour

    11. Re:One Prediction Is Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few calculations (assuming 1 byte pixels):

      Umm...what kind of a TV do you have? Because uncompressed color pixels take up a heck of a lot more than 1 byte per pixel. Assuming 32-bit color for each pixel, your calculations quadruple.

      (Score: -1, Troll)

    12. Re:One Prediction Is Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1GByte for SD was correct.
      Uncompressed NSCT video is 158Mbps:
      CCIR= 720x480x29.97fps x 16 bits(4:2:2)
      so, 1 minute is about 1.2G Bytes.

      But who cares about uncompressed video anyway?

    13. Re:One Prediction Is Impossible by Cyno01 · · Score: 2

      We have 250GB drives now. So by your calculations (which seem a good standard) in 10 years we'll have 250TB hard drives. God i hope IDE is gone by then.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    14. Re:One Prediction Is Impossible by Temsi · · Score: 1

      I work with uncompressed HD materical, as well as DV and MPEG (1,2 and 4).
      Uncompressed HD consumes approximately 10GB per minute, which translates to around 600GB per hour.
      So, a 1TB drive would hold roughly one 90 minute movie, or 3 sitcoms (with commercials).
      Since nobody in their right mind would consider uncompressed video for a PVR, MPEG-2 or MPEG-4 compression is a likely choice. Based on current DVD bitrates and resolution, MPEG-2 at HD resolution would require at least 15MBps, which is at the low, low end for HD (more like 25-30 for good quality, up to 45 for excellent quality).
      MPEG-4 could probably get away with as little 5-9MBps for tolerable quality HD, so assuming MPEG-4 is used, 1TB disk could hold anywhere from 300 to 550 hours of HD video, so the article is not really that far off. Hundreds of hours of HD is literally possible in one TB, using good compression and fast cpu's.
      Now, the hours you could store using DV resolution would be quite impressive... Assuming 120KBps (1200kbps) MPEG-4, we're talking 2314 hours of video... That's over 96 days. So, even if you tivo an entire season of the Top-20 rated prime-time tv shows, you'll still have enough space to cap a few dozen movies in DVD quality.

      --
      -- This sig for rent.
    15. Re:One Prediction Is Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...using current video codecs, that is. But what about when we're using MPEG-20 or something?

      I figure in 2012 we'll all be using the newly-released Ogg Tarkin.

    16. Re:One Prediction Is Impossible by m1a1 · · Score: 1

      Assuming that it can be packed into 1/10th of the original size, that yields, by your calculations, 650 hours, which is in the hundreds.

      If you can invent a lossless compression algorithm that will compress HD-Video to 1/10 of it's normal size, you will be billionaire. But don't expect to be doing it because my guess is it is impossible. Now 9/10 of the size, that might be doable, and would at least push you over 100 hours.

    17. Re:One Prediction Is Impossible by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      so do I, and the definition of UNCOMPRESSED is the real issue here. When we talk about uncompressed SD (ie D1) video what we usually mean is 4:2:2 non-DCT video, with 10 bits per channel an d NO alpha. Quite what uncompressed HD is remains to be seen, what with a current uncompressed standard still to be found. I suppose that D6 is the best match, but many would rather than Cineon's .dpx was adopted with its log LUT. I rather suspect that we'll have to wait for the Viper camera (or others like it) to catch on before we can really pin down a standard. Surely HD-CAM can't be it!

      As to how much data or TiVo of the future could stash, I would hope that it will simply save the broadcast MPEG2 data stream directly - so worrying about MPEG-4 is irrelevant as long as we have an MPEG-2 broadcast infrastructure in place.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    18. Re:One Prediction Is Impossible by Temsi · · Score: 1

      Well, right now HDCAM is it. 4:2:2 and all. The Thomson Viper, (which rocks) is 4:4:4 and requires a cumbersome direct to disk system since no tape can currently handle all that information.

      Current DirecTV TiVo boxes DO save the mpeg2 stream direct to disk, and thus don't even have any analog inputs. But this limits your choices, because current HD signals require 19.5 MBps (and are almost exclusively 720p, not 1080i or 1080p), and I'm sure MPEG4 will be an option for PVR's in a few years. HD is still evolving, but at the moment, HDCAM is the format we stick to.

      --
      -- This sig for rent.
    19. Re:One Prediction Is Impossible by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      errr.... nope

      Uncompressed SD video (in America, as you seem to be) is 720W x 480H x 29.97Hz; Y,Pb,Pr 4:2:2 10 bits per channel. The typical audio standard to accompany this is FOUR channels of 48Khz, 20 bit PCM.

      In PAL countries it's the same but 720W x 576H x 25Hz - all else equal.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    20. Re:One Prediction Is Impossible by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      Actually, by DVD quality, I was referring to the max 9.8 MBit/sec allowed on DVDs.

      --
      Luke-Jr
  42. IMHO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I predict that in the year 2012 i will finally have a date! YES! Girl Geeks. mmmm

    1. Re:IMHO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to take this opportunity to announce that I have recently started dating a girl geek. And yes....mmmmmm :-)

  43. As Avery Brooks said: by AnamanFan · · Score: 3, Funny


    "Where are my flying cars? I was promised flying cars..."

    - Avery Brooks (In a IBM commercial)

    --
    AnamanFan - Trying to find the Truth, one post at a time.
  44. Do we really want these things? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
    Every device on the net? Privacy, saftey, cost, and what the hell? Why do I need a toaster connected to the net? I just want to make some frickin' toast. If something is smart enough to be net connected, it is smart enough to be hacked. Ordinary devices could be the new invasion of privacy. And damnit! Toasters are going to be cheaper without tech, than with.

    My presence is for me to decide. I don't want anyone to know right where I am unless I tell them or they are with me. The first anyone who insists on knowing my wherebouts 24/7 (who's not my wife ;) will learn a lesson in the wherebouts of my fist.

    Smart tags wont be on price tags, they'll be built in to products. Again, I don't want little tattletales broadcasting every thing I have to anyone with a hig gain scanner. Theives will move from the store to your home. Expect that they will be illegal to remove by anyone, too.

    TV will move to a pay per show model. Product placement will be rampant, as well as the commercials (you'll get those for free, of course. ) Expect shows to be shorter, and drawn out over longer periods. Reality Based shows will most likely thrive, since many of the things they will do on TV won't be allowed in RL. Invasiveness is the key.

    Talking to my computer will still be hampered by bloated code, legislation, monopolies, and chewing with my mouth full.

    All this will be driven by companies who want you to consume more and more. Durabillity will be replaced by a throwaway society - recycling will most likely be increased, since raw materials will become scarcer, and the number of people will continue to balloon.

    See you there!

    1. Re:Do we really want these things? by insac · · Score: 1
      I could want them, but just if I can config them to give just the information I want to the people I want .

      There are situations when you'd like to let somebody know exactly where you are...

      The problem is that, even if such a tecnology will be developed in 10 years, it won't become "common" since it will be too complicate to "filter".

      Ok.. there's another possibility.. people could use "default settings" not noticing they've said farewell to their privacy.. :-(

      --
      This message doesn't need a sig
    2. Re:Do we really want these things? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      ever think that those tags can be set up to deactivate if they walk through the scaner?

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    3. Re:Do we really want these things? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
      What are the chances of that? The emerging attitude is that you don't 'own' the stuff you buy, you just have a licence to use it. (See X-box)

      The argument will be for leaving the tags operational so returns and exchanges will not require a reciept and can be tracked back to the factory. Circuit City is aready holding on to the list of things you buy there; having a chip tell them that it is the original and hasn't been switched, will be one of the many 'features' that retailers will go ape over. Inventory control, and customer profiling/databases will be others.

      It's just like taxes and herpes. Once you get it, you can't get rid of it.

    4. Re:Do we really want these things? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      so make the chip reactivate when it enters the spesific feild of the store you bought the item from.

      it would be interesting to see how they handel licensing food :-)

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  45. They always overlook... by SYFer · · Score: 1

    ...it won't seem to odd to say, ``Car, how far to the next gas station?'' and for the car to reply ``Eight miles ahead at exit 37, there is a Chevron and a Union 76.'' ...the commercial aspect and assume we'll all enjoy these benefits for free. More likely: "Eight miles ahead at exit 37, there is a Quick-Stop Cheveron with Food-O-Rama and Travellers' Information Center. To hear about... 1... other option, please say "additional options please" while pressing the "options" key on your dash."

    --
    "...all the labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness..." yada yada
  46. My Prediction: by Tiro · · Score: 1
    We will be bombarded nonstop by invasive ads like the stupid SBC Pacific banner video that I saw when I viewed the link.

    I had been browsing in Mozilla a long time and I didn't remember just how bad ads can be when using IE . . .

    1. Re:My Prediction: by _repressor_ · · Score: 1

      Leela: Didn't you have ads in the twentieth century?
      Fry: Well, sure, but not in our dreams. Only on TV and radio...and in magazines...and movies, and at ballgames, and on buses, and milk cartons, and T-shirts, and bananas, and written in the sky. But not in dreams, no sirree." -Fry

  47. Something old, something new... by InnovATIONS · · Score: 2

    Most of these predictins are fairly safe. One of the most interesting is the self-checkout store. It might be hard to get the tags tamper proof. Remember that they would not merely have to get them tamper proof in terms of being to sneakily remove them, but tamper proof in the sense of preventing them from transmitting or tamperproof in the sense of having the recievers not get the signals, such as good old fashioned jamming. Some real challenges, but not out of the question entirely. The preciction that your family, etc will allways know where you are may well prove to be possible but unwanted (as may be the prediction about having your washing machine tell the company how often you are washing clothes). This is just an extension of the electronic name tags in the 1992 article. People want some privacy. It is a bit like universal picture phones. The first picture phone was demonstrated in a demonstration between AT&T headquarters and the Secretary of the Treasury in Washington. The Secretary of the Treasury was Herbert Hoover (yes, that Herbert Hoover, the technology is really that old).

    1. Re:Something old, something new... by koko775 · · Score: 1

      actually, this system is already in place in this one country...i forgot the link, but i believe i saw it in Technology Review.

  48. Re:mod parent up!!! by martyn+s · · Score: 2

    overrated and underrated don't appear in metamod

  49. My Predictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I predict people will have had enough of getting a bill every month listing millions of micro-payments for all these invisible services. Paper will still be paper, the internet will still be two dimensional, and nobody will use email anymore because instant messaging is less spammy when you simply block all incomings not on your address list. Wood panels will become popular on cars again, and on computers too. A large desktop PC will be the size of a coke-can and generate enough waste heat to cook your evening meal.

    Distributed.net will have finished another couple of pointless projects. Seti will still being going strong and getting nothing back in return. Cancer will be cured by computers, and aids will still be spreading wildly in poor countries while patented drugs keep rich people alive indefinitely who have the same disease.

    Every major city in the world will still have terrible traffic problems. Computers will model perfect cities and nobody will build them. Nuclear weapons will still be able to wipe out humanity, and at least one small country will become a small scorch-mark as a result (and this will have been predicted 2 hours ahead by a computer model).

    Armadillo Aerospace will have the first 'flying car' but it won't be available for public use because it's too dangerous.

    The International Space Station will be almost finished and still not particularly useful (as far as anyone can tell). People will not have ventured to the moon or mars. Nor will they have plans to. (or budgets maybe).

    And I will still be reading Slashdot.

  50. About the talking car by happyhippy · · Score: 1

    A UK show called Drive or something had in it a couple of weeks ago a car with a verbal command phone. You say the persons name and it calls him/her. Thing was you had to set it up with the names first and the voice recognition was terrible. It took two hours for the presenter (Jeremy Clarkson) to vocally input and store a phone number and its owner.

    1. Re:About the talking car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but JC is a twat.

    2. Re:About the talking car by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      no argument there, but I voice dial my 'phone (a humble Ericsson T-28) EVERY DAY without problems - why can't Clarkson manage it?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  51. Not Quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything that could conceivably be part of a Beowulf cluster will be part of a Beowulf cluster!

  52. Not many electric objects will be connected. by deragon · · Score: 1

    Honestly, when people make predictions, why they forget the cost impact?

    I would not want my wash machine cost an extra $30 for electronics so it can warn a repair service which will charge me $70 to fix a problem where my water is slightly more warmer than it should and cost me only $3 more per year of electricity. And if my wash machine has a serious defect, I will find out the old way by hearing or seeing what is going wrong; no need of a computer for that.

    And if you want to connect appliances to the Internet, either you use the electric grid for data transmission (if available) and you must pay for it, or you connect the appliances to your ethernet network (assume you have ADSL internet). How many of you have houses with ethernet near the wash machine? How many will drill holes through your walls to get ethernet to your wash machine?

    The suggestion is feasable technically, but not practical. It won't be widly deployed. Same thing with GPS. I do not want to pay more for a GPS in my car; I do not get lost that often.

    I do not want my appliances to be intelligent because the more complex they are, the more the chances of failure and the more they cost at purchase and for maintenance. I like my wash machine as it is, as my refrigerator.

    Having electrical appliances connected to the internet are certainly not killer apps, and that is why they will fail on the market (unless these appliances provide actual browsing capabilities on the internet, like on a refrigerator or a microwave; some people might actually want this).

    --
    Remember the year 2000? They promised us flying cars. They delivered the PT Cruiser...
    1. Re:Not many electric objects will be connected. by autopr0n · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How many of you have houses with ethernet near the wash machine? How many will drill holes through your walls to get ethernet to your wash machine?

      Ah, but you forget the WiFi. The device I'm writing this comment on has no material connection to anything.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  53. This is awful by realmolo · · Score: 1

    Is anyone else even just a LITTLE disturbed that most of these predictions require 24/7 surveillance (one way or another) of any person that wants to take advantage of them? I'm sorry, but barring some new totalitarian regime taking over the U.S. (which could slowly happen, like a frog boiling in a pot), NO ONE in their right mind is going to want all this stuff.

  54. Huh by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    If we have flying cars and inexhaustable electricity sources, what do we need zeplins for?

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Huh by Toraz+Chryx · · Score: 1

      Obviously, the flying cars won't run on electricity....

    2. Re:Huh by archen · · Score: 1

      Actually I'd really like to ride on a zepplin.

      Think luxury cruise, but in the air.

    3. Re:Huh by ameoba · · Score: 2

      When anything is possible, inefficiency becomes stylish.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
  55. Look back on 1992... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When looking a the future, it can be a good idea to look at the past predictions of the future. Here is a link to that. And you know, so much has changed since 1992. We were going through hard economic times, the president was a guy named "Bush" and the U.S. was in a conflict with Iraq. My, how times have changed. :)

    1. Re:Look back on 1992... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, in 2012, the President will be Clinton (Hillary), in the midst of a scandal over having sex with an intern in the Oval Office. Meanwhile, a giant economic bubble will be forming, with venture capital for all! Sounds fun!

  56. The truly good thing by kliment · · Score: 1
    Would be a way to replicate matter, and a source of huge amounts of energy to power it. That would give material things the same status as movies and music on P2P networks today. If you could borrow your neighbor's car, computer, etc, and replicate it exactly. Truly this would change the way corporate entities work. I wonder what form copy protection would take? Tactical nuclear explosion on copy attempt?

    If hardware takes the same status among college students as software, one can imagine all sorts of interesting stuff. And of course, making a render farm would be much easier.
    Would there actually be any incentive for software/hardware development? However, this would mean that money would be meaningless, so any work people do would be of pure interest or wish to develop creatively. Creativity would actually be the only task left to humankind.

    At this point, another scenario would be the installation into each human of a happybutton, that gives an instant orgasm. Humanity would then be kept in a state of constant ecstasy, never being creative like before. Maybe this is the end of the world in 2012 that people are talking about in other comments. Would you trade your current lives for eternal bliss?

    1. Re:The truly good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scientists have hooked up mice with a 'happybutton', and when given the choice between pleasure and food you can guess how it turned out. Most of them died of starvation.

      Matter replication would take raw materials to copy stuff, and the chemistry involved might not make it easy.

    2. Re:The truly good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and a source of huge amounts of energy to power it

      Well, if they can do E=mc^2, surely they can do mc^2=E

    3. Re:The truly good thing by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      it's called HEROIN, and is NOT advised by your family doctor (although he's been known to enjoy it himself...)

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    4. Re:The truly good thing by SunPin · · Score: 1
      ...the installation into each human of a happybutton, that gives an instant orgasm.

      This would be a mess at the least and a serious biohazard at worst. The sinister among us would surely use it as a cheap prank to make others unhappy.

      "Take this...[presses happy button] BIAAATCH!" Didn't the Romans have this? Where did it get them.

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
    5. Re:The truly good thing by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "If hardware takes the same status among college students as software, one can imagine all sorts of interesting stuff."

      I would be more interested in the reverse. This means transferring matter into energy. Using something like that, our landfills would instead be raw fuel. Problems with lack of cheap power could be more easily addressed. Poroblems with overflowing landfills could also be more easily addressed.

    6. Re:The truly good thing by kliment · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's exactly what I am referring to. The rat pressed the button at a constant rate of 8000 orgasms/hour until it died of starvation. It had a sexually fertile mate, food, and drink available.

  57. I don't know about these predictions... by 7-Vodka · · Score: 5, Insightful
    1. Every appliance is connected to the internet.

    That would mean that internet connectivity has to be wireless and cheap. It would also require people to WANT their appliances connected to the internet. I'm sorry but my washing machine works really well right now on it's own without it bugging me to take it in or yelling adds at me. If that's why these machines want to connect (to rip me off, advertise to me, tell me i should take it into the dealer and pay more money) then I'm gonna be ready with a nice jamming signal for them.

    2. The IM prediction and online presence.

    Maybe it will be like somewhat as he says. But I sure as hell am not going to have a damn gps signal telling everyone who wants to talk to me exactly where I am. And I'm not gonna be available all the time either. My settings are gonna default to "leave me a god damn email msg and I'll get back to you when I can". Not 'here's my exact location, what I'm doing and 5 ways to page me right now'. :)

    3. Walking out of shops and the rfid tag nonsense.

    Riiight. A store with no clerks. Talk about easy to shoplift if you have your own programmable rfids. or just walk out next to someone else and charge your stuff to their card.

    4. Tivo in every home, no restrictions.

    Let's see if the mpaa + networks will just roll over for that one. My guess is it will be a crippled tivo ripoff with all sorts of DRM and palladium inside if that happens. Anything else will be illegal.

    5. Speech recognition.

    Don't know about this one. Everyone and their mother has thought this was right around the corner for the past 20 years.

    Here's my prediction:
    Corporate America will finally dispense with the play acting and be in direct control of the country. Instead of having senators from each constituency, we will have senator Disney, senator Microsoft, senator Tobacco industry, senator chemical industry. And the president will be the CEO of the country.

    --

    Liberty.

    1. Re:I don't know about these predictions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > And the president will be the CEO of the country.

      Country? Hm... call 'em Zonepresidents by that year (check how the countries are chopped up for DVD's by now to get a feeling how the world borders of tommorow will look like).

    2. Re:I don't know about these predictions... by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      On the first one, I can see the appliances coming with the ability - whether or not the connectivity is there is another thing.

      But I imagine that the Best Buy drone will be bugging you like crazy to purchase the internet monitoring service like they do with the extended warranty - just another way for the companies to get money.

    3. Re:I don't know about these predictions... by clarkie.mg · · Score: 2

      2. The IM prediction and online presence.

      Maybe it will be like somewhat as he says. But I sure as hell am not going to have a damn gps signal telling everyone who wants to talk to me exactly where I am. And I'm not gonna be available all the time either. My settings are gonna default to "leave me a god damn email msg and I'll get back to you when I can". Not 'here's my exact location, what I'm doing and 5 ways to page me right now'. :)

      10 years ago :

      Maybe it will be like somewhat as he says. But I sure as hell am not going to have a damn mobile phone telling everyone who wants to talk to me just ring me now. And I'm not gonna be available all the time either. My settings are gonna default to "leave me a god damn voice msg and I'll get back to you when I can". Not phone me, ask me what is my exact location, what I'm doing ...

      This comment reminds me what many people (myself included) were saying at the beginning of the mobile phone era : "What ? A mobile phone ? Never ! I don't want to be bugged. Now the fun thing is that the most spoken words when you pick up the phone are : "where are you ?"

      --
      Men are born ignorant, not stupid; they are made stupid by education. Bertrand Russel
  58. ObFriends (the TV show) by still_sick · · Score: 2

    "And in a few years you'll be able to talk to your computer. You can say like 'Wash my car', or 'Clean my room'. ... Of course it won't be able to do any of those things, but it'll understand what you said."

    --
    ...Also, I didn't know Buggalo could fly.
  59. Speech Recognition by crea5e · · Score: 1

    Speech recognition prediction is like the "first post posts". Computers may get complex enough to understand speech. But you know I bet then they decide not to listen cause they think we are just a sad sack of genes, "All they do is complain and read slashdot. Life is tough as a server." Don't want them to be like humans, they may just become human and that'd be a problem.

  60. 2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    5. Phasers

    4. Force Fields

    3. Transporters

    2. Replicators

    1. Warp Drive

  61. Not with MPEG-4 or equivalent... by Goonie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They're talking about squeezing HD-DVD onto the same physical medium, but using MPEG-4 compression rather than the MPEG-2 currently used. Now, assuming that a DVD can hold 9 gigabytes and a necessary minimum capacity of two hours, that's about 4.5 gigabytes per hour. That gives about 220 hours of storage.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    1. Re:Not with MPEG-4 or equivalent... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3, Interesting


      They're talking about squeezing HD-DVD onto the same physical medium, but using MPEG-4 compression
      rather than the MPEG-2 currently used.


      Isn't the max res of MPEG-4 short of what real HDTV requires? From what I understand a lot of people think trying to cram HD-TV onto a DVD-9 is going to lead to a lot of compromises in video quality.

      From what I understand the majority of equipment manufacturers are pushing HD DVD as something with a blue led and 25 GB per layer.

  62. Re:2012?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The world ends sooner that 2012 according to this article.

  63. Washing machine, quit making long distance calls! by dagg · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "... You'll no longer be surprised to get a call from the repair center at Sears or Maytag saying your washing machine is using too much hot water and needs adjustment -- information the washing machine has sent through the Net, without any action of your part, back to the factory where it was built."

    That sounds kind of silly. Would be kind of like the grocery store calling me up and telling me I was low on milk. Yes... it would be great to know that my washing machine is using too much hot water... but the washing machine should tell me, and not Sears.

    --
    Fun Sex
    --
    Sex - Find It
  64. Re:its gonna suck to be stupid 10 years from now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah. What will you do?

  65. 2012 - endpoint of Viridian design movement by humble · · Score: 3, Insightful
    That year is also make or break for the Kyoto protocol and the complementary Viridian design movement.

    I'm a bit surprised that some more thought wasn't given to how different our energy consumption patterns and transportation modes will be by then.

  66. I predict by enos · · Score: 0

    I predict that the Hurd will be almost done by then.

    --
    boldly going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse
  67. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  68. Re:2012?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, we all know the world ends in 2012, right??

    Actually, No.

    The world ends in 2039, when the Unix clocks all fail, and we all get blown up by nuclear warheads and melting reactors.

  69. Social consequences by SiliconEntity · · Score: 3, Insightful

    His predictions may make sense technologically, but not socially. Your appliances might be on the Net, but they will only be accessible to you. Your refrigerator will notify you by email or equivalent when it needs service, not the manufacturer. People don't want their appliances talking to strangers. The owners will want to be in charge.

    Likewise when checking out in the store, you will need to explicitly authorize the purchase, otherwise you could contest it later. You will be presented with an itemized receipt based on a scan of your items, and you're supposed to look it over quickly and make sure there's nothing on there that you didn't buy. Then you do something to initiate the payment. You can't let people take money out of your account without giving approval! There has to be some action you take to explicitly authorize a certain amount to be transfered.

    With the "presence", again you will have much more control over it than he implies. You will be able to say who can find out how you are reachable. You can have filters that automatically email you when your voice mail comes in, etc., so that people with different levels of access don't necessarily know how much priority they're getting. That way you don't offend people.

    As far as ubiquitous TiVo, it depends on the outcome (both legislative and technical) of the copyright wars. You may be able to record the shows only under the control of strict DRM software that won't FF through the commercials (like the way DVD players won't FF through the FBI warnings now).

    One additional social/technical prediction I'd make is more use of webcams for business meetings, creating the virtual office. Assuming that terrorism scares keep happening, people will prefer not to travel so much, and employees will want to stay home and not come into the dangerously concentrated population areas downtown. We'll see a continued trend towards white collar workers using live video feeds to communicate with their co-workers both locally and around the world.

    1. Re:Social consequences by nuggz · · Score: 2

      Your appliances might be on the Net, but they will only be accessible to you. Your refrigerator will notify you by email or equivalent when it needs service, not the manufacturer. People don't want their appliances talking to strangers. The owners will want to be in charge.

      I don't think so, most people don't care, they just want stuff to work.
      I think most people would be glad to get a phone call asking to come repair stuff for me so I don't have to think about it.

      Look at water treatment (softeners, deliverty), this is a product that is starting to have homeowners choose a maintenance contract.
      If you don't think that is trivial enough, many companies hire coffee services to make sure they have enough coffee cream and sugar around.

      The average person doesn't care about the privacy implications of everyone knowing you have a dirty lint filter in your dryer.

    2. Re:Social consequences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does your average person (NOT your average Slashdot reader) have any problem with spyware/adware if they can get free things? Just look at how most people still use Kazaa instead of Kazaa Lite, or other spyware products. Some of these people would gladly allow their information to be sold if it would mean getting better deals on products you need (like if your washer broke and they knew you wanted a new one).

      Does your average person care about Windows Update? No, most people think it is a good idea because it (supposedly) gives them the latest security updates without making them go download patches.

  70. 2001^H^H^H^H2012 by koko775 · · Score: 0

    How long until the car says "I'm afraid I can't do that, Dave."?

    stupid joke, mod me down already! :P

  71. Orgasms aren't 'the most pleasurable thing ever' by szort · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Constant orgasms actually sound somewhat unpleasant.

  72. of course, we'll have much larger hard drives..... by autopr0n · · Score: 4, Funny

    220 gig hard drives are already on store shelves. You can easily build a 1tb raid array today if you want to. Think about the size of hard drives in 1992. What, 120 megs? If the triend continues we'll have half petabyte hard drives by then.

    Of course, they will run at 400 degrees and last a week, but tradeoffs always need to be made...

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  73. Re:Orgasms aren't 'the most pleasurable thing ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must not be doing it right, then.

  74. RFID cloaking device, uncappers by goombah99 · · Score: 3, Funny
    my counter-predictions for 2012+1

    In 2013, after you install the water limiter uncapper, your maytag washing machine finks on you and collects a reward.

    In 2013, the invention of the RFID cloaking devices (aluminum lines shopping bags), leads to whole sale shoplifting. An new chain of stores called "shop-naked" emerges, and becomes wildly popular not only as a place to meet members of the opposit sex, but because it is the only place that sells food in the city anymore.

    in 2013, stranger-on-a-train parties become an out-of control trend, with complete strangers exchanging their Presence ID tags. Thus subverting the tracking scrutiny of big brother and his computerized corporate stooges. Faced with a loss of control over ordinary citizens, President Jenna Bush imposes mandatory ID tatooing and all babies receive an injected RFID module.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:RFID cloaking device, uncappers by /dev/trash · · Score: 2
      Call me pedantic: but Faced with a loss of control over ordinary citizens, President Jenna Bush imposes mandatory ID tatooing and all babies receive an injected RFID module.

      Jenna would be one year too young to be President. In 2012, it'll probably be ( gag me) Hillary Clinton.

    2. Re:RFID cloaking device, uncappers by goombah99 · · Score: 2
      ...and tinfoil underwear becomes the rage again...

      A new web site for the elderly nerds "slash-dotter" reaches 100 million site visits per day, mostly from embedded network enabled Depends.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    3. Re:RFID cloaking device, uncappers by Suidae · · Score: 2

      Jenna would be one year too young to be President. In 2012

      Thats ok, I'm sure she can find a good fake ID to present to the election commision (or whoever checks those details)

  75. Heh by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Actualy I'd never seen a video banner ad like that. A few box ones though. Flash can have sound in moz, so I don't see why that would protect you.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  76. 1992 - 2002 by Maxime+Lefrancois · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:1992 - 2002 by smoondog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I thought his 1992 predictions were much more bold, and in many ways they were pretty accurate. His 2002 predictions seem a bit restrained and ... boring.

      -Sean

    2. Re:1992 - 2002 by ameoba · · Score: 2

      THe predictions weren't too bad, but his self-evaluation of several of them was overly generous. His prediction of electric cars was in no way worth an A; a C+ would be more accurate, considering the price premiums they fetch. The portable TV satelite is, again, another joke; While the portable 10" screen is easily doable, the portable satelite is non-existant.

      His grading scale seems overly generous, giving A's for seeing things possible without regard for their market penetration. Even based on the (inflated) scores he gives himself, his overall average is more like a C+, rather than the B he gives himself.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
  77. We already have these by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    They're called 'genitals',

    Seriously though, how would pushing this so-called happy button be any diffrent then masterbating?

    And if they made you truly happy, they'd be illegalized just like Ecstasy and heroin are today.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:We already have these by Licensed2Hack · · Score: 1
      Seriously though, how would pushing this so-called happy button be any diffrent then masterbating?

      Well, for one thing, guys wouldn't need so much hand lotion.

  78. self cashier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the self checkout would so not work, somebody will have to put these secial tags on everything in the store, if one thing is not taged then basicly when somone walks out with it he will not be billed for that item, nice idea but why would a store take a chance when the system they have now with real cashiers works good.

  79. Yeah, right... by i_need_no_nick · · Score: 1
    ...every object we own that uses electricity...

    Electricity? In 2012?

    Doesn't this guy realise all our primitive electron-based technology will have been rendered useless by the countless EMPs from our future nuclear wars?

    What about prediction number 6: There will still be sandwitch-board men proclaiming that "The end is nigh"?

  80. Re:self cashier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, at my grocery store Giant, I use the self-checkout line pretty much everytime. Many people are still scared of it, so the wait is generally much less. Pretty easy. I just scan the items, pay, and go bag them up. Works well.

  81. Re:Presence exists... big brother is stalking you? by johnpaul191 · · Score: 3, Informative

    it's not only on AT&T's mLife plans..... it's on a lot of newer phones... basically any phone that boasts "e911" has a GPS or GPS-like thing going on. my friend's latest phone (on verizon) has this feature, and it's not an expensive phone. it can be set so it is only active if you actually dial 911. in a sense it is kinda cool, in a sense it is creepy as hell. if you sail off the highway on a backwoods road during a snowstorm, you would be psyched you have it (assuming you have signal). if your boss uses it to find out you are not sick and actually going to see Star Wars 3, then you'll hate it.

  82. Talk to computers? by miffo.swe · · Score: 5, Funny

    Imagine an office landscape of about 100 people. It will sound like a chicken farm on fire.

    Isnt handsfree silly enough to watch? Will the computer understand foul language and respond by deleting files (happens anyway if you use Windows).

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
    1. Re:Talk to computers? by ragnar · · Score: 2
      Isnt handsfree silly enough to watch?

      I suppose people first felt pretty weird some 50-75 years ago talking into a machine. Yeah, I feel sort of goofy whenever I turn on speech recognition. I start to wonder if my roommates hear me and think I've gone over the deep end, but I don't think twice about answering the phone. Who knows? The social norm may shift.

      --
      -- Solaris Central - http://w
    2. Re:Talk to computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been said that the pun is the poultriest form of humour. :-)

  83. Re:Presence exists... big brother is stalking you? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 3, Funny

    I ALREADY hate Star Wars 3 and I haven't even seen it yet

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  84. Re:The Art of Cunniligus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i dont really see what this has to do with predictions but thanks for the info all i have to say is who is hungry

  85. You already know.. by flatface · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In 10 years, we'll all look back on this and laugh. The same way that we do when we watch an old science fiction movie that was made without the thought in mind that people would still be watching it 30 years later.

  86. predictions by prefec · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My washing machine won't talk to the producer in 10
    years. There is no reason to do so. My mothers
    machine is now running for 20 years and her old one
    did it for a longer time.

    Also my computer won't understand me in 10 years.
    Because it won't get the contexts. The problem with
    context cannot be solved with more memory.

    The next predition was a video recorder with
    1TByte. Well that sounds reasonable to me, but
    without special keys I wouldn't be able to watch
    anything on that disc, because it is encrypted.

    Well I predict. Less freedom, and more control
    over knowlegde, resources by big companies.
    Also there is a tendency for more riots, terrorism
    and other kinds of disorder.

  87. Talking to your computer by weiyuent · · Score: 1

    I presume that this guy is predicting that we'll interact with the computer through voice only, without need for keyboard or mouse. If so, then this prediction is way off, because speech recognition is only one small part of the puzzle.

    Think of it this way. Sit with someone and walk them through performing relatively simple tasks, but try to do it without being able to point to the screen.

    "Click on the red button, no, no, not that one, the one next to the green button, then tab into the next text field, type this in a-p-p-l-e-space-j-u-i-c-e, ok, now right click, enter, then select brown from the third drop down box, oh what's a drop down box?"

    Pretty complicated, huh? And that's with perfect speech recognition software in your buddy's head.

    To carry out tasks beyond the mundane like dictation will require a radical interface redesign, along with some pretty cool AI. Now, I think this technology might be within grasp by 2012, but far from widely deployed. As we've seen, Microsoft (and the market) likes incremental rather than radical change.

  88. that'll put an end to shoplifting by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

    "store merchandise that rings itself up for purchase"

    Imagine merchandise that recognises when its being taken out of the shop and bills your account...

    "Oh I'm so brave and clever walking out of the shop without paying! I could never afford all these goodies!"
    (checks bank account the next day)
    "Oh crap I guess I'll have to find a cardboard box to live in"

    Fragging brilliant; retail prices will be able to drop thru the floor! (but they won't of course; have profit, *keep* profit! INCREASE profit!)

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  89. Re:Washing machine, quit making long distance call by aztektum · · Score: 2

    You can opt out for a monthly fee

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  90. I agree by cebe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't have any faith in speech recognition.

    I'm already using it, and it drives me nuts. When I add money to my "pay and talk" cell phone account, I am forced to use their new (within the past couple of months) speech recognition menu. I am literally answering a robot's questions, and she makes me want to bang my phone on the closest solid structure near me.

    Welcome to Rogers At&T pay as you go service, would you like to add money to your account today? Please say yes, or no.

    Yes

    I'm sorry, I didn't hear you, would you like to add money to your account today?

    Yeeeees.

    I'm trying to ask you a question. Please answer with yes or no.

    YEEEEEES

    this is the part where I wonder if swearing at the system will make it work. Maybe it recognizes "i said yes you piece of shit android" No it doesn't (I tried), but it usually takes about 5 tries, and I get into the "add money to my account menu" where i can then use the keypad (still) to enter in my P.I.N., new card number, etc.

    --
    You have paid for a total of 0 pages and so far 0 have been used up (0 today).
    1. Re:I agree by GriffX · · Score: 1

      No kidding. I used to be able to check my balance on First Union's 800-number in about 30 seconds flat. Helpful, when you're as constantly broke as I am. Now, I have to maneuver through three different menus just to get to the manual option so as to avoid - um - RECITING MY ACCOUNT NUMBER AND PIN OUT LOUD IN PUBLIC!

      --
      These comments and opinions are mine and mine alone, although they shouldn't be.
    2. Re:I agree by tricknology · · Score: 1

      I've had the same problems, mostly with sprint pcs. I've found that if you yell "I want to talk to a real person," and sound quite angry, it takes only a few seconds to get a person on the phone. Whether or not they're anymore helpful than the computer is left as an excercise for the reader.

      --
      I never been so broke that I couldn't leave town.
    3. Re:I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting article about it here:

      Just Say No to Voice Portals

    4. Re:I agree by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 2

      Dial 1-800-555-TELL

      Try it. You have to speak clearly, but it works pretty well. MUCH BETTER than the old style phone trees.

    5. Re:I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you using a cell phone or a portable phone? I've found that speech recognition has progressed a bit in the last 10 years. It used to be "Computer, what time is it?" "Are you sure you want to shut down?"

  91. Slashdotted... here is the text by halo8 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Bold technology predictions for 2012
    By Mike Langberg
    Mercury News

    Smart devices that talk to each other without human intervention, store merchandise that rings itself up for purchase and machines that finally understand the spoken word are just some of the new technologies awaiting us in the year 2012.

    On Monday I gave myself a ``B'' for my 1992 predictions of what life would be like in 2002.

    Before sticking my neck out another 10 years, I consulted three Silicon Valley futurists: Tim Bajarin, president of technology consulting firm Creative Strategies in Campbell; Tim Brown, president of Palo Alto design firm Ideo; and Paul Saffo, a director of the Institute for the Future in Menlo Park.

    I've borrowed many ideas from these three deep thinkers, but the predictions that follow are mine -- so I deserve all the blame for anything that looks silly 10 years from now.

    So here are my five big ideas for how technology will reshape our daily routines in 2012:

    The Internet is everywhere -- and nowhere.

    Almost every object we own that uses electricity will be connected to the Internet in 2012, yet we will rarely be aware of this near-universal connectivity, because so much of the conversation will be machine-to-machine communication.

    You'll no longer be surprised to get a call from the repair center at Sears or Maytag saying your washing machine is using too much hot water and needs adjustment -- information the washing machine has sent through the Net, without any action of your part, back to the factory where it was built.

    All present and accounted for -- always.

    Instant messaging is popular, in part, because IM software tells you which of your friends are online waiting to chat. This concept, formally known as ``presence,'' will be extended to all forms of electronic communication.

    Family, friends and co-workers will be able to instantly see where you are, thanks to wireless phones even tinier than what's available today and other devices with built-in GPS locators. You'll be able to specify how you wish to be reached: by text if you're busy, by voice or video if you're free. Between now and 2012, expect major controversy on whether employers, schools and advertisers should have access to your ``presence.''

    Walk now, pay later.

    Stores without doors will rely on RFID, or radio-frequency identification, tags to keep track of inventory and payment. These tiny semiconductors communicate a small amount of information, such as a product serial number, when queried by inexpensive transmitter/receivers. Only recently selling for several dollars, RFID chips should cost only a few cents next year and will be smaller than a grain of rice.

    In 2012, RFID chips will sell for less than a penny and be printed onto packaging and price tags -- the beginning of the end for cash registers. You walk into a store, put what you want in a bag and walk out the door. An RFID transmitter/receiver in the entryway instantly totals up your purchases and makes a deduction from the RFID credit card in your wallet. If nothing else, RFID could have spared Winona Ryder her recent and very embarrassing shoplifting arrest.

    Prime time is your time.

    Every cable and satellite television receiver will include a hard disk for recording shows, and those disks will have a minimum capacity of one terabyte, or 1,000 gigabytes, enough to store hundreds of hours of high-definition programming.

    Except for special events such as the Super Bowl and the Academy Awards, no one will watch TV shows at the time they are transmitted, and conventional 30-second commercials will be rare because advertisers won't pay when most viewers can hit the fast-forward button. Major broadcast networks and traditional prime-time programming will be fading, with most entertainment sold through either a monthly subscription or a pay-per-view fee.

    Finally, we can talk to our computers.

    I'm recycling a prediction from 1992 that didn't come true this year but just might happen by 2012: Reliable speech recognition will allow computers, phones and household appliances to understand our spoken commands.

    Driving alone down an unfamiliar interstate, it won't seem to odd to say, ``Car, how far to the next gas station?'' and for the car to reply ``Eight miles ahead at exit 37, there is a Chevron and a Union 76.'' You won't need to know or care that your car required GPS navigation, a speech-recognition processor, a text-to-speech synthesizer and a wireless data link to an online Yellow Pages directory to answer what seems like a simple question.

    Not everything will change in the next decade. I predict the Mercury News will continue, printed on paper and delivered to doorsteps every morning. The business of putting news and ads together on newsprint has worked for more than a century and probably has at least a few more decades of life. As for me, if I'm still here in 2012, I'll dig out this column and give myself another report card.

    --
    The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
  92. Re:2012?!?! by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 1

    Actually there seems to be some discrepancy as to whether the end will come on 12/21 or 12/23. See http://www.jaguar-sun.com/endcount.html.

    Personally I'm hoping for 12/23 as that's my birthday. Could make things interesting :)

  93. How the car will REALLY answer... by dpbsmith · · Score: 5, Funny

    Driver: Car, how far to the next gas station?
    Car: Eight miles ahead at exit 37 there is a Chevron station.
    Driver: Is there a Mobil station there?
    Car: No.
    Driver: Are there any closer gas stations?
    Car: Yes.
    Driver: Where?
    Car: Six miles ahead at exit 36 there is a Citgo station.
    Driver: Are there any Mobil stations within the next twenty miles?
    Car: Yes, there is one four miles ahead at exit 35.
    Driver: Why didn't you tell me that in the first place?
    Car: To keep the costs of the service low to you, we present you with value-added featured placements first. By the way, wouldn't you like a larger penis?

  94. Plan by tadas · · Score: 5, Funny
    1) Make predictions in 1992

    2) Have a lot of them turn out right

    3) ????

    4) PROPHET!!!

    --
    This page accidentally left blank
  95. Jenna bush by goombah99 · · Score: 2
    2013: dateline kennebunkport
    Jenna Bush, (R-texas) speaker of the house, was sworn in as president earlier today after the tragic death of President Jeb Bush, and vice president and consort, Kathleen Harris. The president was killed in a tagic suicide pretzel attack organized by the cuban branch of al quaida. The tragic news interrupted a beach front photo-shoot for playboy's Girl's of the Whitehouse issue.

    On assuming the presidency, Jenna Bush abolished the DEA and ordered the whitehouse rose garden roto-tilled, and replanted with first class "presidential grade" Jamaican "hemp". In a slurred Inaugural speech she nominated Eileen Fleiss as Vice President, and called for Hot grits down natalie portman's pants. And obvious reward to the slash dot lobby that rigged the computerized elections for her father.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Jenna bush by /dev/trash · · Score: 2

      Wow, that was quite the write up.
      I'd only say that it's more likely that Democrats would appeal the drug laws and have Playboy photshoots.
      Not that, I as a republican would enjoy a nice "Women of the White House" spread.

    2. Re:Jenna bush by Gooberball · · Score: 1
      Wow, that was quite the write up.

      I'd only say that it's more likely that Democrats would appeal the drug laws and have Playboy photshoots.

      Not that, I as a republican would enjoy a nice "Women of the White House" spread.

      Don't you mean repeal?

      Not that, you as a republican, can really take the moral high ground. After all, you did vote for the worst president since Reagan...oh wait, you probably voted for him too!

      -Prays every night for the 00-year curse to come true for Bush.

    3. Re:Jenna bush by /dev/trash · · Score: 2
      Don't you mean repeal?

      Oops, yeah. and I should have said "Not that, I as a republican wouldNOT enjoy a nice"

      Not that, you as a republican, can really take the moral high ground. After all, you did vote for the worst president since Reagan...oh wait, you probably voted for him too!

      His term is not even over and he's already the worst since Reagan? And no I am not a Democrat so there was no way I could have voed for Reagan. ( I was 12 at the time).

      -Prays every night for the 00-year curse to come true for Bush.

      If Gore or Kerry are the only two people the Democrats can muster for '04, you better pray a lot harder.

    4. Re:Jenna bush by Gooberball · · Score: 1
      His term is not even over and he's already the worst since Reagan?

      He is the worst president since Reagan and he seems to be working really hard at being the worst president ever.

      If Gore or Kerry are the only two people the Democrats can muster for '04, you better pray a lot harder.

      Yeah...cause the guy who beat him the last time will have such a hard time doing it again after he's had a chance to demonstrate his ineptitude.

      The only thing republicans have going for them is their (admittedly) superior foreign policy. Of course, when you're unemployed because of massive lay-offs, you're not going to be all that concerned with whatever boogiemen Bush or Adolph Hitler...oops, I mean Donald Rumsfeld, have come up with lately.

  96. Walk now, pay later by El · · Score: 5, Interesting

    He obviously hasn't thought this one through; he's claiming that in 2012, anybody will be able to steal your credit card and then walk out of stores with anything they want, and there will be no impetus on the store to actually verify that it is you? Doesn't sound like a viable business model to me! Winona would then just claim that somebody stole her RFID and still steal from Saks!

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    1. Re:Walk now, pay later by nstrupp · · Score: 1

      This technology currently exists and is in use. An excellent example is the Mobile Speed Pass. You wave a keychain near a gas pump and are charged for gas. Where is the store verifying your identity in this case?

      Recently Bank of America started a test using RFID to allow people to make small purchases using a similar technology. In this case you have a clerk ring up your goods, you wave a small keychain-like device near a reader and away you go. What he's predicting is just one step further that what is in practice today. The usual rules of credit cards apply here. You will be able to dispute charges you didn't make and are then not responsible for the charges.

  97. I'm suprised no one brought this up by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 1
    Where will Linux be 2012?


    I think that it will be doing well. I think with it being embraced by more organizations, it will have a larger user base and it will finally be pretty user friendly.


    I think Windows will still be a expensive, buggy, memory hog.


    I think that people mostly just want speed and user-friendliness out of their computer programs. No matter what features Windows throws on, I don't think they'll stop defections. People will want a free reliable OS once and for all.


    That's my opinion, I could be wrong.

    1. Re:I'm suprised no one brought this up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      linux will be:

      linux-2.9.999RC2.tar.bz2

  98. frustrations. by DarkHelmet · · Score: 2

    Between now and 2012, expect major controversy on whether employers, schools and advertisers should have access to your ``presence.''

    I worry more about what the police would do with it. I also worry about what kind of blackmailing is possible if people can see online that I'm going to a dark alley downtown for something.

    People hawk it as a matter of convenience, and a matter of safety. But you know, it should be my right to drop off the radar, and EVERYONE'S radar...

    Even if only for a little while.

    I am not a celebrity. I am not a criminal. I am nobody important.

    Why do I have to be tracked like I am?

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  99. Re:Presence exists... big brother is stalking you? by killmenow · · Score: 1

    I can't wait until this tracking feature is a de facto standard. Then, all I have to do to disappear for a while is let a friend borrow my cell.

  100. IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...computer talks to you!

  101. Sure, it's possible... by nurightshu · · Score: 2

    ...but only if every mathematician who's ever worked out an orbital mechanics equation is dead wrong.

    Shithead.

    --
    They that would sacrifice their .sig space for that cliched Franklin quote deserve neither.
    1. Re:Sure, it's possible... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      so where's YOUR fixed point of reference, then?

      fucknut

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    2. Re:Sure, it's possible... by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

      but only if every mathematician who's ever worked out an orbital mechanics equation is dead wrong

      You're wrong.
      Several pre-Copernican astronomers/mathematicians worked out mathematical equations to explain and predict the motions of the planets based on a stationary Earth.

      BTW, what essay competition are you talking about?

      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  102. But is it? by Markonen · · Score: 2

    I admit that I haven't been following the latest developments in the field, but saying that recognizing speech and understanding the content are totally different things seems like an awfully bold statement.

    I'd imagine that understanding the content is exactly what makes humans such cunning speech recognizers. Understanding can mean different things to different people, of course, but I'm sure that the first speech recognition machine to pass your test will contain at least some sort of semantic analysis to beef up the score.

    1. Re:But is it? by BitHive · · Score: 2

      You and another poster make very good points, but limited semantic analysis still does not take us much closer to making a machine understand speech. If it were indeed the key to our language ability, we would have competent AI right now, as semantic rules are well understood and can be (and have been) applied to speech recognition.

  103. /.ers will see naked women in the flesh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    but not get any action until the 2038 Unix Time bug forces them to leave their machines and go forth and copulate

  104. Slightly different view... by Restil · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All his assumptions are based pretty much on what we TODAY consider to be desired. The fact is, in 10 years, we'll have changed our perspective so that such things, once past the gee-wiz phase, have evolved into more mainstream appliances, that do what we want them to do, and more importantly ONLY what we want them to do.

    Everyone doesn't have a cellphone..... yet, but it seems to be getting that way quickly. You can't walk down an asile in the supermarket without seeing someone talking on the phone, usually about some useless, pointless conversation that is only occupying what free brain cells they have left, and leaving very little, if any, available for any other purpose, like not blocking the asile, or applying the brakes in an orderly fashion. More and more places are banning active cellphone use, mostly to appeal to the customers that find others yelling into the cellphone during a movie to be somewhat disruptive. And those of us who value our privacy will venture away from the option to be located anywhere at any time. The feature might exist, but very few people will probably use it, unless its necessary.

    RFID tags are great, and it makes sense to simply walk out the door and have your credit card deducted for the right amount as you do. And if you accidently walk out with something you're not supposed to, it will let you know. If it was a simple accident, you have the option to walk back in. If it wasn't, you can still run.. :) But better than the embarrasing situation where you've accidently labeled yourself a criminal because you misplaced that package of bubblegum when you were shopping.

    Cable already SHOULD be advertising free. You're paying a monthly fee for the shows, you should get them without advertising. And if not for the advertising, they shouldn't care when, or how many times you watch something. As long as you keep dishing out the monthly fee, and you will, it should make little, if any difference. Its the dependance on advertising that's biting the cable networks in the ass, hence their bitter complaints about Tivo and the like. Rid themselves of the advertising beast, embrace the PVR, restructure their budget, and life will be good.

    As for voice recognition, we got that today. Of course, there's an AI element that's lacking, but if the driver is willing to stick to a standard convention for command structure, most of what the author is predicting in 10 years could be done today with little difficulty. The simple fact of the matter is, 99% of the time, I know where the nearest gas station is. Only travellers need this information, and most intellegent travellers will fill up at the most convienent opportunity (i.e., not when they have 10 miles worth of gas left) Better for the car to simply inform me as I'm passing a gas station, knowing my destination and most likely route, that the gas station I'm passing is the least expensive one I will pass before running out of gas and therefore I should stop now to fill up. Screw asking the car about it. :)

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
    1. Re:Slightly different view... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, I'm not up to date on the cable company finances, but...

      If there's no ads on TV, won't my monthly rate go from like $50 a month to around $100-150?

    2. Re:Slightly different view... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Move to Fairfax County, VA and watch it do that anyway.

    3. Re:Slightly different view... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      If there's no ads on TV, won't my monthly rate go from like $50 a month to around $100-150?

      No, that's not how monopolies work. The price of cable is determined mainly by demand, and not supply, since supply is effectively unlimited.

  105. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  106. Re:Washing machine, quit making long distance call by iabervon · · Score: 2

    Actually, your washing machine will negotiate will your day planner when the guy can come out to fix it. Then you'll renegotiate around all the things you don't want your day planner to know about. The your washing machine will email Sears, and the guy still won't show up that day.

  107. Re:2012?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it would suck to die so young and still a virgin.

  108. Re:its gonna suck to be stupid 10 years from now by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nah, "stupid" will just move up a notch and the stupid people will be that much more advanced. I mean stupid people today are driving cars, operating computers to some degree, and have a somewhat decent scientific understanding of things like germs cause disease, and evolution, and other things.

    In contrast, Stupid People in the middle ages were illiterate and relied on a lot of superstition.

    So future stupid people will probably be just fine with new technology. The problems will come when todays stupid people can't handle new tech, much like many seniors today and computers.

    Future geeks will probably be just as aggrivated with these new advanced stupid people.

  109. And my predictions for 2022 by Maxime+Lefrancois · · Score: 1

    Daikatana expansion set finally out

    After years of anticipation, Final Fantasy XXX is announced but is canceled 24 hours before release date.

    George Lucas announces Star Wars Episode 10,11 and 12

    First man to ever transfer his life into a computer

    Bill Gates tragically dies after Windows Etherlife crashes because of lack of stability and incompatibility with Paladium 4.0

    A CD still costs 25 bucks

  110. In Soviet Russia, headline is not in "we have!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, you're supposed to change "[Subject] [verb] [object]" sentences to "In Soviet Russia, [object] [verb]s [subject]!" Yours turned "[sentence fragment headline] into "In Soviet Russia, we have [headline fragment sentence]."

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia, headline is not in "we have!" by p_trinli · · Score: 1

      Hehehe... LMAO, guys. :-)

  111. Not bloody likely... by phatStrat · · Score: 1

    .. and conventional 30-second commercials will be rare because advertisers won't pay when most viewers can hit the fast-forward button.

    Uh... no. Who says that within the next 10 years that there will be a fast-forward button? Advertisers have a lot of clout; don't expect them to sit idle. And they've already started complaining...

  112. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by flewp · · Score: 3, Funny

    In Russia Soviet we have... errr forget it.

    --
    WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
  113. Wired--when you wanna be by kitzilla · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You have a great point here.

    I'm waiting for Americans to decide which technologies give them more or better personal time, and which technologies invade and destroy it.

    Cellphones can be a blessing. They can also be a way for our employers to extend office hours through dinner and bedtime.

    Instant messaging has become a burden to me. Being available all the time for any priority of message is like moving your office desk or living room couch to the mall.

    I want nothing to do with people-tracking technology. The folks I care to know where I am during my day do. I don't want strangers, the Pentagon's Total Information Awareness program, or the Bush Administration tracking my movements as if I'm some sort of migratory animal, thank you.

    Let's make toolks for the workers, rather than turning the workers into tools.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
    1. Re:Wired--when you wanna be by kaxman · · Score: 0

      Let's make tools for the workers, rather than turning the workers into tools.

      ---
      *bink*

      I'm gonna remember that one, thanks.

      --
      Everyone on slashdot has a journal.
    2. Re:Wired--when you wanna be by MoneyT · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actualy, I like having a cell phone. In fact, it's essentialy my primary phone, my landline only used for business dealings. Why? Because I can turn off the cell phone and forget about it till whenever. Sure I can unplug the land line, but it's a hell of a lot easier to puch a button and never have to worry about a call. It also alows me to be in touch with people when I ootherwise could not be. The net presense idea isn't a bad one, I just want the option to turn it off.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    3. Re:Wired--when you wanna be by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      The problem is, when people know you have a cell phone they always say "why didn't you answer the phone, you have a phone by your side at all times!"

      It's a double-edged sword sometimes. (I've been there, had a Cricket phone for a number of months until I got sick of people calling me, knowing I had it with me.)

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    4. Re:Wired--when you wanna be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, the tools are the workers.

    5. Re:Wired--when you wanna be by Suidae · · Score: 2

      The problem is, when people know you have a cell phone they always say "why didn't you answer the phone?

      Why is that a problem? Just tell them you didn't feel like answering the phone. Explain that the phone is a convienance for you not them. Its the truth, and if they have a problem with it, its their problem, not yours.

  114. Culkin!?!?! by freeweed · · Score: 2

    Anyone check out his 1992 predictions (for 2002)?

    this year's hot Hollywood hunk, teen star Macaulay Culkin

    Ummm... yeah. And he claims he wasn't full of it back then :)

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  115. Can anyone play? by mtec · · Score: 5, Funny

    There will be a pill men (and women) can take to remove the need for shaving. Trade named Depilorex, those that take the pill will lose all bodily hair and be referred to as 'smoothies' leading them to start a cult that worships the head of Steve Balmer.

    After years of mis-understanding and accidental death, new Tablet PC's will come out that are chewable, in colorful Flintstone shapes.

    Bill Gates will be a distant memory having been killed in 2006 in a bizarre accident when his computerized bidet malfunctions (a brief investigation can find no evidence of tampering and very little evidence of Mr. Gates)

    Steve Balmer retires from Microsoft in 2005 to star and produce in a remake of the Battle for the Planet of the Apes. Mr. Balmer also becomes heavily involved with the smoothie cult as it's symbolic leader and introduces ritualistic clapping and hopping to the group before being asked to reduce his role and "just be the head"

    Terrorism is a thing of the past when, in a 2003 CIA plot, the leaders of al-Qaida are clandestinely fed Depilorex and cannot look at each other without giggling and are too embarrassed appear in threatening videos.

    The new head of Microsoft, an incomplete 6 year old Bill Gates clone hastily harvested from the scene of his death, announces (via a translator 'Mr. Wuzzy his Spokes-Teddy Bear') the switch to a new open source philosophy, introducing the new direction with a new mascot, a fuzzy green reptile called 'Opensaurus' and changing the marketing tagline of the company to "We wanna play too! "

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  116. Re:Presence exists... big brother is stalking you? by Proc6 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    if your boss uses it to find out you are not sick and actually going to see Star Wars 3, then you'll hate it.

    Leave your phone at home?

    --

    I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

  117. this has got to be a joke... by IlluminatedOne · · Score: 3, Funny

    The world ends sooner that 2012 according to this [yahoo.com] article.

    1. Re:this has got to be a joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the double [yahoo] are you a stupid fuck that does not know it is automatic?

    2. Re:this has got to be a joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to a stupid fuck who uses run-on sentences?

  118. Re:Washing machine, quit making long distance call by JohnFluxx · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually it reminds me of cars. They have lots of diagnostics built in, and check the engine etc, and then doesn't tell you about the results. Instead you have to go to the garage, where someone will read what the engine is saying, and repeat it back to you...

  119. The Most Important Improvement! by dajalas · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dildonics matures, but is still too expensive for the average geek.

  120. Re:2012?!?! by HiThere · · Score: 2

    Well, in that case we had better watch out the next time 1 Reed comes around. (I think I have that date right. Anyway, the predicted return of Quetzacoatl.)

    Last time it ended up being Cortez.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  121. Crashes ahead... by Mazzaroth · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Movies are, so far, the most data intensive information products we consume. Books, music and images are a tiny fraction of the data bandwidth a movie (or visual experiment) requires.
    So, let's say:

    I live 70 years

    I watch 5 movies per week (2 hours each)

    one hour of high-definition movie is about 2 GB Then, in my entire life, I will consume something like 70 TB of data. Of course, maybe there will be 3D-surround immersion imaging devices... But eventually, we will be able to store locally all the information we can consume and produce. Storing more will be useless. Eventually, we will reach a point where more and better technology will be useless.

    This reminds me something I read a long time ago: Knowledge Crash. Science progresses. It takes more and more time to reach the bleeding edge of science and improve on it. In the beginning of the century, you could write Nobel-prize class papers at 20. Now, you need to be a little bit older. Eventually, to improve on science, you will need a life-long study. And we will reach a point where human life will not be long enough to improve on humanity's knowledge. I know, teaching techniques improves over time, but even then, there will be a limit. The only way out will be a longer human life... or a limitless human life. But until Kurzweil's dream (read this too) become a reality, both technology and knowledge crashes are part of our future - and more technology will not be usefull anymore...

    I wonder what kind of society we will live in then... and what being human will mean. :-)

    1. Re:Crashes ahead... by russellh · · Score: 2, Interesting
      This reminds me something I read a long time ago: Knowledge Crash. Science progresses. It takes more and more time to reach the bleeding edge of science and improve on it. In the beginning of the century, you could write Nobel-prize class papers at 20. Now, you need to be a little bit older. Eventually, to improve on science, you will need a life-long study.

      Now, now, now. Einsteins are born, not made through study. Vannevar Bush shared your concern, though Khun disputes the very idea that science makes progress. Real advancements - the paradigm shifts - are most often stimulated by the young, because of their youth and naivete, not in spite of it. Knowledge has very little to do with it. In 1905, Universities were full of quite brilliant and far more knowledgeable people than Einstein. Nobody knows what creativity really is and where scientific magicians get their inspiration. It's certainly not mountains of books.

      --
      must... stay... awake...
    2. Re:Crashes ahead... by Transcendent · · Score: 3, Interesting

      only way out will be a longer human life... or a limitless human life.

      This could be obtained within (10 years anybody?) our own life time artifically. Even if 500+ years from now the limits of science has been reached for natural humans, I'm sure within that time they would have figured out some way to increase the activity, density, and size of the human brain, allowing us to think just a little bit smarter than what we can today...

      Even if we do not change the physical aspects of the human brain, I'm sure we would have eventually come to a better understanding as to how our brain functions, allowing us to at least enhance our own thinking process a little.

      In the beginning of the century, you could write Nobel-prize class papers at 20.

      Who says we can't? It is the upbringing that is limiting us. Having to sit in a public school in mindless classes and PE can really hold a child back from reaching their real potential.

      teaching techniques improves over time, but even then, there will be a limit.

      There is no limit. No one knows the final outcome of the human brain. With more development of brain-wave (thought pattern) recognition, the possibility of thought induction is there. Who needs a text book when you can download information into your own mind? The only type of teacher you would need would be a mentor of some sort to teach you ethics and how to harness the potential of your brain. We very far away from fully understanding the human brain... throughtout that quest, I'm sure we'll figure out ways of enhancing it.

      Yes, in order to reach scientific breakthroughs we need a bit more effort compared to the past, but it does not mean that we will never reach a time when that will change. Let's just hope we don't kill species before we get to that point.

    3. Re:Crashes ahead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then, in my entire life, I will consume something like 70 TB of data. Of course, maybe there will be 3D-surround immersion imaging devices... But eventually, we will be able to store locally all the information we can consume and produce. Storing more will be useless. Eventually, we will reach a point where more and better technology will be useless.

      I think you'll be in for a surprise if you try using any Microsoft products 10 years from now. Even today, Visual Studio .NET is a 3.5 GB install.

  122. the Auto-ID center at MIT, Oxford, etc. by overunderunderdone · · Score: 2

    The AutoID center is doing field trials on using the RFID tags for inventory (but not I think for automagic checkouts) & I understand that the first real big order for tags has been made by one of the major consumer products companies.

  123. What?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No DNF jokes?

  124. Re:of course, we'll have much larger hard drives.. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

    If the triend continues we'll have half petabyte hard drives by then.

    That's a big if. There have been numerous articles claiming we are nearing a thermal limit on recording density.

  125. This is Easy... by BubbaTheBarbarian · · Score: 1

    Predictions for 2012:
    1. Users that do try to learn will piss me off.
    2. Software will fit the hardware. Has since Windows 98.
    3. I hearby declare the therom of the bloat, that being tha bloat will always ruin the implementation of any good idea.
    4. See number 3 for why any feature you THINK will really be around by then will not. I will still be using this damn keyboad, your mouse will still be sticky.
    5. The only REAL features you will have in 2013 that are not in the pitcutre now.....NOTHING. All the same shit, all smaller.
    6. Oh, and MS and DRM will by then rule all or fall by the wayside.

    One bit to rule them, one bit to find them, one bit...shit, I hate quotes.

    WAR TUX!!!

  126. Currently HMM-ANN hybrids are best. by kindofblue · · Score: 1
    I think the best speech recognition systems are hybrid Hidden Markov Model-Artificial Neural Network systems. The guy from the Swiss research lab, Bourlard, that just claimed that the latest Bin Laden tape could be a fake, is one of the originators of the hybrid approach, I think. The ANN does phoneme (or actually a smaller unit called a phone) recognition and those hypotheses are fed to an HMM that has the language model trained into it.

    Also neural networks are algorithms, and actually most neural networks (by far) are 3 layer feedforward networks, with 1 input layer (for basically one slice of the speech spectrogram), 1 hidden layer and 1 output layer with a node for each hypothesis phone(me). The hidden and output layers have nonlinear activations. They are a mega-bitch to train because of the nonlinearity and they usually converge to non-global error minima. There are many ways to train an ANN, and most are iterative with random initial conditions, so that's why they are not algorithmically optimal.

    But to run online, they are fast and deterministic (i.e. the non-recurrent variety), and can be done in a few lines of Matlab or page of C code.

  127. Why it won by Animats · · Score: 2
    The Internet is everywhere -- and nowhere.


    Won't happen. "Home control" has been possible for 20 years, and very few people bother. The system administration outweighs the advantages.

    This will take at least 15 years. People don't buy new washing machines all that often.

    All present and accounted for -- always.

    This will be in mobile phones within 5 years.

    Walk now, pay later.

    Probably unfeasible as described. More likely you will authorize payment for the item before putting it in the bag. The receiver at the entryway will only check that you don't leave with any unpaid items. 10 years is about right, I wager.

    Prime time is your time

    Not very adventurous there. 5 more years.

    Finally, we can talk to our computers

    People curse them every day, so this is already reality. ;-)

    I doubt true voice control will be there in 10 years either, unless there is a major break through in AI technology. Before that, we will be limited to simple voice keyed activation.
    "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush

  128. One time at Shoreline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it was at a Grapeful Whosits show, some guy gave me some green liquid that made the sidewalks move.

    Frankly, I was much happier when they stopped....

  129. Toyoda by luzrek · · Score: 1

    Of Course Toyoda will have an all hybrid-electric fleet.

    --

    Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

    1. Re:Toyoda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya know, if you're linking to an article with the word "Toyota" in the headline, you could try to spell it correctly here.

      Runner-up for sarcastic comment: You put the "duh" in Toyoda! (works better when spoken, not written)

  130. Re:2012?!?! by ryan89 · · Score: 1

    according to Terminator 2, the world was supposed to end on August 29, 1997. I think we made it okay..

  131. yup.. by naelurec · · Score: 1

    May 1990 (ok .. a bit more than 10 years ago) 80MB was twice as much as I'd EVER need ... Well this according to a Laser computer rep.. (umm.. laser computers.. hehe.. a little short sighted and *poof* no longer here!)

  132. Why it won't happen. by Animats · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The Internet is everywhere -- and nowhere.

    Won't happen. "Home control" systems have been marketed for 20 years, and have never caught on. The system administration takes more time than the thing saves. How many people even use the time clocks on ovens?

    All present and accounted for -- always.

    Truckers have had this for years. You can buy it for your car now. It will be a work-related thing, not a generally used feature.

    Walk now, pay later.

    Probably not, but things will go faster at checkout.

    Prime time is your time.

    Not if the MPAA can stop it.

    Finally, we can talk to our computers

    No way. We have speech recognition now. What we don't have are systems that comprehend natural language. We're no closer to that than we were ten years ago. If you like speech recognition, call TellMe at 800-555-TELL, which offers news, sports, driving directions, phone information, and movie tickets. Try to buy movie tickets in less than five minutes of talking.

    1. Re:Why it won't happen. by jim3e8 · · Score: 1

      "Home control" systems have been marketed for 20 years, and have never caught on. The system administration takes more time than the thing saves. How many people even use the time clocks on ovens?

      If they're on the Net, they can just use NTP ;) One unanticipated benefit of my SliMP3 is that the time is always right (it syncs to a box that gets time from the UIUC NTP servers). I don't bother setting my VCR clock after a power outage any more.

  133. F*ck no I wouldn't trade by BurKaZoiD · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Although I think life often sucks big monster peckers (I love my job, hate my boss; I make alot of money, but just buy more expensive shit, so I'm not rich, etc), I wouldn't trade the pain of trying for things or working for things just because I could have a happy button attached to my nuts making life much simpler. I hate pain and disappointment as much as the next person, but it's the suffering and learning from suffering that makes me who I am, and try to become who I want to be. I'll die trying on my own before I ever have something handed to me.

  134. Disregard previous message. by Animats · · Score: 2

    Pushed submit button too soon. Sorry.

  135. NO! NO! NO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The world will end/change on Dec. 31, 9999AD, according to this calendar. As you can clearly see, the calendar does not extend past this date and our modern calendars are much more accurate than those of the Mayans. Surely time will end on this date, or why else would the calendar stop here?

    1. Re:NO! NO! NO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will happen in 9999 because that's what tells COBOL programs to stop! Or was it Fortan?

      You guys remember that Y2Kesque crock? It's like saying that typing "*(char*)(NULL) = 0xff;" into Microsoft Word is going to make it crash. :)

    2. Re:NO! NO! NO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://calendarhome.com/cgi-bin/tyc.pl?century=999 9999999999999999999999999&year=0&month=3&chang e=1

  136. 30-second commercial more resiliant? by k1w2m3 · · Score: 1

    I have a hunch that the 30-second commercial will be alive and well. Between content protection, plugging the "analog hole", and the DCMA, the networks could put an end to time-shifting. I can't see them doing it for all shows because of the outcry, but I can see a network exec proposing that the final episode of Friends (or all episodes of some very hot show) be shown with no copying allowed. "We'll make it an event!" The promos will tell you to 'make an appointment to see this show', 'be there on time or you'll miss it!' Bingo, captive audience for the 30-second spots.

    One foot in the door (a few special shows or special events) and then it just creeps in more and more.

  137. MOD THIS UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1 Insightful.

  138. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by tigga · · Score: 1

    Why do you have such narrow poin of view?
    Why not in SOVIET UNION?

  139. But Darnit! ... by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 1

    I want some sharks! With some frickin lasers?!?! Where is that prediction? Huh? Huh???

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
  140. Some predictions I want answered by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 2

    I'm suprised he didn't predict the fate of "Trusty Worthy Computing" as it's such a hot ticket item to discuss these days. Here are some questions I have on my mind:

    - Is M$'s "Trust Worthy Computing" going to actually succeed or flunk? If it succeeds will there be a growing trend towards stringent enforcement v.s. those who openly and secretly defy Pallidium-style architectures? Will there be a new, strong underground movement of "black hat" hackers out to destroy any new tech trying to police content? Will DMCA become a "national priority"?

    - Will the RIAA succeed in preventing all forms of "digital theft" using DRM + lotsa lawsuits, or will we still P2P file networks? Will the RIAA create a "new internet model" that would prevent individual artists from self-publishing their own works across the 'net?

    - Will 64-bit CPUs be common, and AMD the one leading in this sector?

    - Will Apple finally release OSX on x86 hardware?

    - Finally the questions we all want answered:

    Will Microsoft finally die as a huge behemoth?

    Will it be killed by none other than Linux?

    And...

    Will Linux Desktop actually be easy to use?

    Or will Linux(forgive me for saying this) become bloated crap by various distributions that must fit on 5 DVDs?

    Or will Microsoft after dying release Windows source code under GPL in order to compete against Linux?(I can dream, can't I?)

    Please follow up and add your own questions you are curious about!

    1. Re:Some predictions I want answered by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

      - Is M$'s "Trust Worthy Computing" ... DCMA become a "national priority"?
      Like all things Microsoft, it'll flop at first only to exist later (after sinking much money into it) as a metastable compromise targeted at Joe Consumer, whereas "professional" computing will remain relatively unaffected (but with increased hardware costs... no sub $1000 video editing PCs). The DCMA will have undergone judicial review and some of the clauses rendered harmless in the aftermath of a hotly contested case.

      - Will the RIAA ... works across the 'net?
      Yes, the RIAA will move to Internet distribution. It will tie into state of the art DRM technology. Of course, we'll all go back to using IRC and sftp to distribute files. P2P will still exist, but it will have become more like a business tool. They will start to resemble advanced implementations of CodaFS.

      - Will 64-bit CPUs be common, and AMD the one leading in this sector?
      Yes, and no. 64-bit will become popular because its OBVIOUSLY better than 32-bit. No one will introduce 128-bit sized words because we don't have 2^64 discrete things to count in the universe (this EXACT argument will resurface as engineers loathe routing unnecessary traces on the die). AMD will hemmorage money and eventually be bought by Hitachi where they continue produce awesome CPUs that no one will ever know existed. (SHA4, for example).

      - Will Apple finally release OSX on x86 hardware? That'll happen much sooner than you think. 10 years from now OSX will be old and crusty. Can't say what the new hip thing will be, except, it'll be UNIX based!!! ^_^

      blah blah blah
      Microsoft won't die. It might buy General Electric and enter the home appliance market (of which the PC is just one...)

      Linux will continue to exist, and someone will package it with and easy to use desktop. They will not make the same mistakes Lindows does. It will involve at least one ex-Be software developer and a graduate student studying user interface design as her doctorate specialization.

      Linux installations will still confined themselves to something approxmating 1/2CDs, but it will come with the latest snapshot of every sourceforge hosted project on an extras DVD.

      The source to core of windows NT 5.x will be released to everyone once version 7 is ready. They will also open DOS so that we can all see how bad it really was back in the stone age. Microsoft figures if they ain't supporting it, it would be a good gesture to give it away (since its useless as far as they're concerned). This will occur only after the untimely death of Paul Allen.

      --
      THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  141. RFID shoplifting with a lead lined bag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the store gets used to people just walking out with a bag of merchandise, what is to stop people from placing the merchandise into something that will block the rfid signal, say a lead bag?

    Also, nobody will ever pay the extra cost for a networked washing machine or dryer, that's just silly.

    1. Re:RFID shoplifting with a lead lined bag by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

      a copper foil bag would be much better for RF between 30 and 900 MHz. I also agree with your second statement. All I want my washer to do is start when I turn the knob and press the button. I don't need an LCD screen to wash my laundry or dishes- you hear that, Maytag? I just want a decent washer for less than 500 bucks and a dryer that dries my laundry in one try. I seriously doubt that I would want my bandwidth gobbled up by appliances that worked for 70 years without internet connectivity.

  142. Gas?! by tomas.bjornerback · · Score: 1

    Do you really believe we still will destroy the atmosphere by burning fossile fuels in 2012?

    I certainly hope we don't!

    The nature certainly hope we don't!

    --

    I have 1 Gbps Internet access@home

  143. Cluster by willpost · · Score: 3, Funny

    "The 'How about a beowulf cluster of these?' joke finally gets played out."

    Steve Ballmer will be chanting:
    Distributed!
    Distributed!
    Distributed !

  144. 2012: No more minorities in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time to celebrate the lack of diversity (if you are still around that is..).

    1. Re:2012: No more minorities in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Kazakstan, diversity celebrates the lack of time.

  145. Retail isn't.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that smart to go with a completely automated check-out. It can be done; see most Zehrs grocery stores, but there are so many problems/discounts/staff discounts/ coupons/ customer stupidity that have to be accounted for.

    Even where automated checkouts do exist they still need a fulltime staffer watching them to make sure ppl don't steal and that the customers don't have a problem checking in their own goods.

    retail is one of the few buisnesses that can never be fully automated. Any one who has ever worked on a cash and seen how many bad barcodes/bad computer codes/ crazy customers there are will know that no computer could ever deal with that

  146. Everything for a fee by gelfling · · Score: 2

    All those golly gee whiz bang thingys are all, well, gee whiz. Therefore they will be premium services. Moreover the extended warranty on all this crap will be more or less required because maintenance and repair costs for your voice reco AI internet aware wireless fridge will be astronomical.

  147. It reeks of 1984 by johnty · · Score: 1

    Just a feeling - many of these predictions, as well as peoples comments posted here, seem to have some sort of connection with 1984. Kinda scary.

    --
    I am unique, just like you, and you, and you...
  148. You don't have to answer the phone! by bluGill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here is a hint: just because the phone rings does not mean you have to answer it. In fact if there is someone physically in your presense it is IMPOLITE to answer the phone unless you are expecting an emergency. (Your wife could go into labor at anytime, your parent is going in for heart surgery, your kid is late in bad weather. There are others, but those are the big ones)

    If I'm in your cube and you answer the phone I will talk to your boss about that, unless you are in customer service they can get voicemail and you will call back.

    Many people are surprized that I, a strong introvert like my cell phone. They don't realise that I'm not a slave to the phone, the phone is my slave. If I'm sitting between two beatiful girls and it rings, I hit cancle without even looking at it. (As a geek I've so far had one such opportunity, I might have blown it, but it wasn't by answering the phone) Manytimes when I could answer it I will just look at callerid and send the caller to voicemail.

    1. Re:You don't have to answer the phone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I'm sitting between two beatiful girls and it rings, I hit cancle without even looking at it. (As a geek I've so far had one such opportunity, I might have blown it, but it wasn't by answering the phone)

      Let me guess - you blew it by trying to impress them by describing your pr0n collection?

    2. Re:You don't have to answer the phone! by blaine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I'm in your cube and you answer the phone I will talk to your boss about that, unless you are in customer service they can get voicemail and you will call back.

      So, you're basically saying you're a colossal prick at work? Because, frankly, my boss (and probably any boss that you've ever told about someone answering their fucking phone) doesn't give a shit that you were miffed at my answering the phone. Sure, I'm going to look at the caller ID quickly to make sure I need to answer, but quite frankly, unless you're the owner of the company, I guarantee you that there are people way more important than you who require my attention at times.

      I mean, christ, acting like you claim to act where I work would get you fired for being a pain in the ass who feels that nothing is more important than paying attention to you. Management has better things to do than listen to you complain that someone did their job by answering a call from a co-worker who needed to contact them for business reasons. Who the fuck do you think you are? I can just imagine it. "Answer that phone and I'll report you to the boss! And then I'll go cry to mommy that you didn't pay attention to me!! Waaaaaaa! Waaaaaaaaaa!".

      --

      -[Blaine]- "'Oh dear,' says God, 'I hadn't thought of that,' and promptly vanishes in a puff of logic."
    3. Re:You don't have to answer the phone! by Suidae · · Score: 2

      In fact if there is someone physically in your presense it is IMPOLITE to answer the phone

      Some people might consider it rude, but I'm not going to trouble myself by trying to predict which people consider various things rude (hmm, elbows on the table or not...). I don't have a problem with people answering the phone while I'm there, as long as its fairly transient, same as if someone they knew happened to walk up to say hello or to ask a quick question.

    4. Re:You don't have to answer the phone! by bluGill · · Score: 2

      Everything with a grain of salt. I've left offices when the phone started ringing and the conversation was about the weekend or whatever. However when I'm asking a deep technical question the interuption of the phone causes both of us to lose our train of throught.

      If your job descritption includes answering the phone, of course you have to. However most people do not need to anser the phone at work as a part of their job. If it is not a part of your job to answer the phone, and someone is personally asking/advising your on a deep issue, then you are a fool if you answer the phone.

    5. Re:You don't have to answer the phone! by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      That's a bit different from "just because the phone rings does not mean you have to answer it. In fact if there is someone physically in your presense it is IMPOLITE to answer the phone unless you are expecting an emergency" ...

      I could send my wife out of the room when the phone rings before I answer it, but she'd get a bit suspicious.

      Fact is, the person calling may have an emergency, but you won't know unless you answer the phone. How do they know that you're deeply engrossed in a deeply meaningful discussion about how many widgets you have to produce next week. Your wife being hit by a car is oh-so less important.

      It's about choice. If the phone rings and I'm too busy with someone else, I'll let it ring. Such instances are rare though, as I am surrounded by people who understand the way business is conducted. Unless the discussion is REALLY important, the phone gets answered. Anything REALLY important tends to get addressed immediately, or in places away from the admin area of my desk. In your case, "asking a deep technical question" would probably mean us slipping off to a meeting room for privacy, or sticking the phone onto Mailbox mode.

      I'm assuming that this is common, as it's been the MO everywhere I've worked for the past 20 years.

      Less of a troll :)

      Gr

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    6. Re:You don't have to answer the phone! by bluGill · · Score: 2

      Maybe you work in a different universe from me or something, but where I've worked the phone has been the highest priority interupt. When the phone rings everything stops. Never mind that something at least as important might be going on.

      Sure in theory the call could be an emergency, but in practice that isn't often a problem. First of all, emergencys are rare for most people. (Excectptions know who they are, and generally are paged not called when) Second, what do you do when there is one of these emergencys and you are in the meeting room? How about when you are on a wildreness hike several days from civialization? In other words, sure there are emergencys that come up unannounced, but it isn't a big deal to miss them.

    7. Re:You don't have to answer the phone! by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      We obviously work in different universes, and it seems from your own admission you are in the wrong one. Everyone in yours has the same at-odds-with-your viewpoint on phones. Mine is different, I suggest you switch universes.

      The one I inhabit, people have a switched on attitude to the levels of immediacy and urgency, and not everyone has a pager. Maybe it's a culural thing - I live in the UK.

      As for wilderness hike - that would have been a choice I made before going, i.e. to sever links with the "outside world". Choices such as that were unavailable 20 years ago, as the ability to be in touch 24/7 wasn't yet widespread.

      You're right when you say that in theory the call is most likely not an emergency, but if my wife is in a car crash, I'd rather be on the way to the hospital than arguing about next year's widget quota.

      If someone walks up to me to chat about something in my cube, they expect that we may be interrupted. If they say, "this is important", we'd likely adjourn to somewhere without interruptions. Failing that, I'd kick the phone to Mailbox mode. There are times when I don't want to be interrupted by anything, and times that I don't mind. Widgets can wait 20 seconds for a phone call - if not, it's a sad, sad universe.

      Gr

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  149. Re:YOU FAIL IT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see you finally created an account name for your troll. I love you. You are probably the 2nd best troll on slashdot today. The IN SOVIET RUSSIA guy is ahead of you, though. He's not original or anything, but I just love him.

  150. Re:Presence exists... big brother is stalking you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And all you need to do to clone yourself is get some cell phone programming equipment w00t. Yay you can be in 12 places at once!!!

  151. seoiweuo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux will make it all possible. Of course, that will be 5 years after Windows actually made it possible and shipping.

  152. By the time 2012 rolls around... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

    ...the average 3.5" 1/3 height hard disk will be storing more like one hundred terabytes, not one terabyte.

    Even with that much storage capacity by 2012 it's likely MPEG-4 will be superceded by an even better video compression format, and we may be seeing a couple of thousand hours of 1080i 16:9 HDTV video stored on a single 100 TB drive.

  153. Re:YOU FAIL IT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I totaly agree with you. He has some of the funniest posts on slashdot. I think it's a shame he starts with a -1 bonus.

  154. Re:2012?!?! by MoneyT · · Score: 2

    Some of us, assuming we survive the fallout, will survive for another year as all macs can handle at least through 2040. Though maybe OS X cut that back a year.

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  155. In 2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mike Langberg will give himself another "B" and make another list for 2022.

  156. Specialize! (was Re:Crashes ahead...) by Theaetetus · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This reminds me something I read a long time ago: Knowledge Crash. Science progresses. It takes more and more time to reach the bleeding edge of science and improve on it. In the beginning of the century, you could write Nobel-prize class papers at 20. Now, you need to be a little bit older. Eventually, to improve on science, you will need a life-long study. And we will reach a point where human life will not be long enough to improve on humanity's knowledge. I know, teaching techniques improves over time, but even then, there will be a limit. The only way out will be a longer human life... or a limitless human life.

    Not necessarily... Back at the turn of the century, there were 'doctors', and 'surgeons'. Now, there are hand surgeons, internists, gynacologists, eye/ear/nose guys, etc. Likewise, there used to be 'physicists', and shortly afterward there were 'theoretical physicists'... now there are high energy physicists, quantum physicists, particle physicists, etc.

    Take any profession... expand it, through more knowledge and technology... you get to the point where you can have people specialize in barely-overlapping fields within the same industry - computer programmers vs. computer engineers vs. network engineers vs. helpdesk trolls, etc. Can your average programmer design a chip? Can your average chip designer program a GUI?

    To view it another way, the age of the Renaissance man is well over... instead, we get the age of the specialized man, with more expertise in a chosen profession than any renasissance man could hope for.

    -T

  157. Oil industry predicts production in decline then.. by xtal · · Score: 2, Offtopic


    Rapid decline of oil production will start around 2012. The growth of an economy only works because we have lots of easy energy around.


    If current consumption trends continue, the world will be having a serious energy problem. The world isn't going to end - we'll just start burning coal for electricity. So much for the environment, though. This is a direct effect of the current price of gasoline - high consumption. Much more effort should be put into higher efficiency alternatives and new means to generate large quantities of mobile energy.


    I have no problem with people driving SUVs, but you should have to PAY for that luxury. I pay about $0.90/l (~$4/gallon) for premium in Canada. We are an net oil exporting nation, unlike the US. I would be much more confortable with a price about twice that - but how many americans are going to handle a $8/gallon price tag at the pump? That'd be no big deal with a 80mpg hybrid.


    What does ANY of this have to do with the topic? I'd put big bets on technologies that allow for teleconferncing, remote work, etc. Telecommunications are likely going to become very valuable as they allow for productive work without much worker mobility. Likewise, technologies related to the more efficient combustion of energy are going to take off. The current model of north american society, commuting, etc - is going to end. It is just not sustainable.


    Bonus to living here though - the US military machine will make sure the effects are felt everywhere else first. Another observation is Russia holds some of the largest untapped reserves of petroleum.


    But hey, don't panic.

    --
    ..don't panic
  158. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  159. I can't wait to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what will happen to email spamming and telemarketing.
    If they continue growing at the current rate something must happen before 2012, be it a change in their dirty practices or some clever politician (about time) outlawing them.

  160. Speech Recognition by m1a1 · · Score: 1

    My dad has always tried to use the newest speech recognition programs, but they are never any good? Why? My dad is a geek in denial. Like any other self-respecting geek, he types faster than he talks. Hell, I type faster than I think. Example:

    Hands: http://slashdot.org
    Mind: No slashdotting, must write program...
    Mind: Oooh, new kernel!

  161. Re:Washing machine, quit making long distance call by kilonad · · Score: 1
    and repeat it back to you...

    ...often at a hefty fee. I was taking my car into the shop one morning and on the way, the check engine light came on, so I asked them to plug their little handheld unit into it, and they obliged (for free, because I'd be paying quite a bit for the service anyway). It took him no more than 30 seconds to tell me my oxygen sensor could be bad. I asked him how much they usually charge to do that, he told me $80. Give them a little more time to read each car, maybe say two minutes, and you've got something that'll make you $2400/hr. Let's hope Sears and Maytag aren't quite as greedy.

  162. In Soviet Russia.... by m1a1 · · Score: 1

    The troll loves you!

  163. Year 2012 problem by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 2

    According to the legacy computer systems, whose calendar runs out in the year 2000, the world has already ended.

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
  164. My prediction for 2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will still have not gotten laid since the last century.

  165. Moore's Law's predictions by Patik · · Score: 2
    How about applying Moore's Law to various parts of consumer computing. In ten years there will be 6.67 "doublings", but for ease we'll say 6.

    Today's CPU: 3 GHz
    2012's CPU: 192 GHz

    Today's RAM: 512 MB
    2012's RAM: 32 GB

    Today's hard disks: 200 GB
    2012's hard disks: 12.5 TB

    And just for fun...

    Today's Quake III fps: 120 fps
    2012's Quake III fps: 7,680 fps

  166. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, all your us are belong to base!

  167. Hurd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hurd will finally be usable as a production system.

    And people still won't care.

  168. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, you work for intelligent software agents.

  169. "Stock ticker" commercials by tlambert · · Score: 2

    I predict that if you are right, and "Stock ticker" commercials end up in vogue, it won't matter anyway, because most of the people watching the television programs won't be able to read the ads, since they'll be illiterate.

    -- Terry

  170. Re:and some more.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent Poster Found In Mad House.

    No, not prediction for 2012, but was my prediction in 1992, and it came TRUE!

  171. terabyte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a terabyte is 1024 gigabytes, not 1000. the fools.

  172. Speech recognition... hee hee hee... by tlambert · · Score: 3, Funny

    Speech recognition... hee hee hee...

    Can you imagine speech recognition becoming so common it gets built into every computer?

    It would be worthwhile paying for a 1U slot in a colocation facility, just to have a machine that has no purpose whatsoever, except to randomly scream out at the highest volume on it's sound card "SHUTDOWN NOW!" to the other machines...

    -- Terry

  173. Television. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 2

    Nothing so elaborate is needed. Americans already tune out reality with just a simple two-dimensional display device, with zero interactivity to boot.

    Anyone remember Fahrenheit 451?

    "I plunk the children in school nine days out of ten. I put up with them when they come home three days a month; it's not bad at all. You heave them into the 'parlour' and turn the switch. It's like washing clothes; stuff laundry in and slam the lid." Mrs. Bowles tittered. "They'd just as soon kick as kiss me. Thank God, I can kick back!"

    The women showed their tongues, laughing.


    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Television. by digitalsushi · · Score: 2

      Anyone remember Fahrenheit 451?

      I was supposed to read it for my english class, unfortunately we had a small chimney fire that winter and lost everything in our den. I'll have to check it out.

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
  174. He rated himself "B"???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I looked at his 1992 predictions, and I would give him a fat "F". He gave himself a B. What a pompous ass. I didn't even bother reading his 2012 predictions.

    I read his stuff once in a while in the Mercury, and he's consistently a case in point that Mercury, despite their location in the middle of Silicon Valley, has weak if not clueless coverage of Technology.

    As for Langberg, he should just stick to fluff coverage like reviewing Palm Tungsten with words like: "I like Tungsten because it fits my small little hand," or "the review sample they sent me had a small crack in it."

    Muckraker he sure ain't.

  175. Re:2012?!?! by Chemical · · Score: 1

    Cystalis for the NES (which came out in 1990) said the end would be on October 1, 1997. Chrono Trigger for the SNES said Dec. 31 1999. Neither were correct, which is strange as video games are usually correct about these things.

  176. Too late... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You haven't been paying attention for the last 20 years, have you?

  177. Re:Presence exists... big brother is stalking you? by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 1
    if your boss uses it to find out you are not sick and actually going to see Star Wars 3, then you'll hate it.

    That should teach you, bringing a cellphone to the cinema!

    --
    Say no to software patents.
  178. Especially since... by devphil · · Score: 2


    ...if you have a job where you can call in sick and not be summoned back (e.g., an ER doctor), you have no business taking a telephone into a movie theater in the first place.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:Especially since... by Bulbor · · Score: 1

      > You cannot apply a technological solution to a
      > sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)

      Not counting smart bombs and laser guided bombs.

    2. Re:Especially since... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...if you have a job where you can call in sick and not be summoned back (e.g., an ER doctor), you have no business taking a telephone into a movie theater in the first place.

      Or maybe you just have a pregnant wife or a small child. Or maybe you just want the convenience of having it right when you get into or out of the theater.

  179. Sounds like Orwell meets Kafka meets Stalin meets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. the Prisoner meets Adam Smith.
    Or to put it another way a Bill Gates wetdream.

  180. Re:In Soviet Russia by p_trinli · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, you're still BORING.

  181. Re:In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not as boring as you, apparently, given the almost total lack of responses to your trolls. You get plenty of redundant moderations, but nobody cares enough about what you say to respond.

  182. both wrong by stud9920 · · Score: 2

    Last time I checked a 4.7 GB DVD can easily hold two hours films. So a 1TB HD gives you about 400 hours DVD quality video.

  183. My predictions - W/ social factored in by MickLinux · · Score: 1
    Okay, let me preface this by saying I read the other comments, and these are different enough that I thing I need to post at the top.

    Prediction 1

    My pre-prediction: His predictions assume that the Nasdaq investment boom continues. I don't think so. I think that we are going to have a slow-slide recession, as businesses are raided for taxes to support war after war, and the IMF, having drained the third world, ceases to bring in "investment" and cheap goods. Here's what I think instead:

    Prediction 2

    Much colder winters in Europe and America, and drought. Our fuel usage *increases* for winter. But the harder conditions result in reduced expenditures for luxuries, including automobiles. A corresponding shift is *beginning*, either into the cities or into the country, away from suburbs. So fuel usage peaks about this time.

    Prediction 3

    We see more and more obvious problems associated with overpopulation, but it becomes apparent that it will not continue: the population crests and starts to fall. AIDS, with still no true wonderdrug, begins to take its toll, as does starvation and (especially) war.

    Prediction 4

    The fall of the technology information sector in America, just as industry fell to foreign competition. Essentially, we remain uncompetitive in America, due to the high taxes and continual war, and other peaceful countries eat our cake. That doesn't mean our programmers disappear; they just start to do other things. Some emmigrate; others redirect their efforts towards...

    Prediction 5

    single-application networkable computers. Essentially, the day of the PC is not over, but it is only useful for entertainment and typing. You want to get something printed? Plug your data card through the smart printer. It handles the rest. Step by step, smart "labor saving devices" are designed and built -- true labor saving devices. Those bread machines were just ahead of their time, and more gadget than useful. But automobile computers, for example, will improve, and tell you when and where a new, unusual noise is coming from *before* the car breaks down. You go to the automechanic, pay $500, and he installs it on your *old* car, too. But they won't be powered on pentiums. They'll be powered on cheap RISC computers, or 8051-XAs, or something else like that. Cheap, slow, but specialized enough that you'll never know it's slow.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  184. Re:Presence exists... big brother is stalking you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leave your phone at home?

    But...but...but, what if I get an emergency call during the movie?!

  185. Re:2012?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's my birthday

    You won't be born for another 10 years?

  186. Re:2012?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think we made it okay.

    Duh. The melted all the Termiator technology to prevent the creation of Skynet. Thank god for that whiny brat.

  187. "The Internet is everywhere -- and nowhere." by Cheese+Cracker · · Score: 2

    Almost every object we own that uses electricity will be connected to the Internet in 2012, yet we will rarely be aware of this near-universal connectivity, because so much of the conversation will be machine-to-machine communication.

    You'll no longer be surprised to get a call from the repair center at Sears or Maytag saying your washing machine is using too much hot water and needs adjustment -- information the washing machine has sent through the Net, without any action of your part, back to the factory where it was built.


    Why isn't the machine smart enough to self-adjust?

    I don't want my appliances on the internet. Sorry for sounding paranoid, but I don't want my household habits monitored by other people.

  188. To: Mike Langberg, From: Mike Langberg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mike of 2002,

    Dont predict that "Reliable speech recognition" will be researched fully by 2012.

    Do mention that time travel will be available.

    Regards,
    Mike Langberg of 2012.

    p.s. Do this to allow I to get that A we, you.. um, I have always dreamed of.

    p.s.s. Turn the oven off, and let the cat out of the house on Nov 25, 2009.

  189. Fuel-cells? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've heard about them for years but nothing really seems to be happening. Then The Air Car is much more interesting: http://www.theaircar.com/

  190. Ahaaaaa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was classic intercourse.... ...so errr, thanks.

  191. Re:Presence exists... big brother is stalking you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You tell your boss you've got a mobile phone... and you tell him the number? Fool.

  192. Re:In Soviet Russia by p_trinli · · Score: 1

    ...but nobody cares enough about what you say to respond.

    Umm... isn't that what you're doing now? Duh.

  193. No cell phones in the theator by Felinoid · · Score: 1

    Good idea to leave it at home anyway just so it won't be confiscated as you walk in the door.

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  194. No, stores could become like toll booths by wackybrit · · Score: 2

    RFIDs on clothing? Wouldnt that make it easier for the people to steal stuff if the cashier element was eliminated? So cashiers will logically have to be turned into security guards in order to watch you. So stores become more intrusive in spying on you.

    No. You'd have a regular register set up for people who want to pay cash, and for those with an approved credit card, they can walk through a lane with a barrier, and as soon as it validates you, it lets you out.

  195. Re:2012?!?! by santiag0 · · Score: 1

    think so? think again: Welcome To Skynet

  196. Few Internet Appliances by StormReaver · · Score: 2

    Having every device connected to the Internet is rather unlikely for one reason I discovered a few months ago: IPv6, which is required for this to work, will get nowhere. Why?

    Because ISPs make a lot of money rationing out the limited range of IPv4 addresses available to the world. As more people and devices get connected to the Internet, the higher the prices for IPv4 addresses will get. IPSs would rather die than lose out on the massive cash flow that results from controlling access to limited IP resources. Allowing a new protocol which allows everyone on the planet to have as many IP addresses as they want will kill the cash cow, and it just isn't going to happen any time soon.

  197. No Ads? by grundie · · Score: 1

    The comment in the article about there being fewer ads due to a viwers ability to fast forward past them makes me wonder... Isn't it inevitable that broadcasters and advertisers try to bring in laws to prevent this? Even if all TV goes subscription or PPV, there will still be advertising, simply because it makes more money for the broadcaster. A good example is Sky TV in the UK. I used to pay £34.00 per month untill I realised there were 20 minutes of adverts per hour! Effectively Sky was getting paid twice for the airtime, by me and by the advertisers. This is the way of the future and broadcasters will not allow PVRs to stop this. Could the fact that Sky have developed and launched their own PVR called Sky+ (which has software that can be changed remotely, without getting the owners permission) be a sign of things to came as broadcasters try to take control of viewing habits?

    We already have a form on enforced advertising with DVDs that won't allow you to fast forward past the trailers. IMHO this will happen with television as well, no doubt backed up with laws to ensure PVRs take their instructions from the broadcaster and not from the viewer.

  198. Re:Oil industry predicts production in decline the by Bulbor · · Score: 1

    I was going to post a comment about Julian Simon but IExplorer crashed when I clicked "Submit".

    Normally that's not a problem as I have learned long ago to copy the entire comment (double-confirmed as I actually cut then paste it back in) I've just typed before clicking "Submit" because there are many problems that occur (one of them is that IExplorer doesn't remember what you entered when you hit the "Back" button when you get the "Slow down Cowboy!" screen.)

    Anyhoo, IE is too damned stupid to copy its cut-and-paste text to the system clipboard until, presumably, one of its windows loses focus. IE crashes. Text lost. I want more MS quality in MY applications!

  199. Not Wine, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully that will be the year that the Neverwinter Nights Linux client is released. Anything before that is just icing on the cake.

  200. not very visionary by dk.r*nger · · Score: 1

    First, as already ponted out in serveral comments; predicting that exsiting, popular, yet still new, technologies will spread, is hardly predicting.

    However, I see serveral lacks, many of which relate to privacy, which is arguable a big issue these days: ... get a call from the repair center .. washing machine is using too much hot water .. information the washing machine has sent through the Net .. back to the factory where it was built

    Well, as more and more machines become 'self-aware' in terms of maintenance (I rode in a taxi - Mercedes - in which the display flashed 'BRAKES NEED MAINTENANCE. VISIT SERVICE CENTER' Hmm..), the scenario is easy to imagine. However, I doubt they'll do more than tell you. They will perhaps offer to arrange for someone to call you up - but only on your request. Imagine spam emitting from this - "You're running ouf of [...] soon, would you like to try the new [...]?". This phone-home stuff is so upopular that even MS Windows XP doens't do it without asking you. "Word 2000 crashed for no apparent reason. Send report?".. Microsoft, folks...

    Family, friends and co-workers will be able to instantly see where you are, thanks to wireless phones even tinier than what's available today and other devices with built-in GPS locators.

    Tinier? It's going to be difficult to make anything much smaller than my Nokia 8310 that will still be useful - I doubt it. More features in the same sized unit, sure, but smaller?

    GPS? The feature may be present for locate nearest, routeplanning etc - but publishing it?
    Sure, for purposes, like, Are any of my friends in the neighborhood so we can join up for lunch? But no way it will happen without the consent of the friend. I also see the build in opportunity to have the device lie - ex. be able to answer "Office" if you don't need to let your girlfriend that you are in the lingerie store at the mall - or other places less innocent.

    The predicted controversy on access to the 'presence' people will not be that big of a deal. If you call in sick and go wherever you go, and you boss calls/'locate's you, you better answer "at home".

    You'll be able to specify how you wish to be reached: by text if you're busy, by voice or video if you're free.

    Yes! Let's have it! I've been waiting for this for years. I can reject a call seven times, and pick it up the eight time and - to the amusement of other participants at the meeting - say "Mother, I am in a meeting, I will call you back in an hour.". And the worst part? She does know how to send SMS/texts - she just doesn't want to have her cellphone on at home (?!).

    Stores without doors will rely on RFID

    Sure. I saw this on a trade fair two years ago. It'll happend anytime the RFIDs become affordable, which they do now, and the systems has passed real-world application hassels.

    Every cable and satellite television receiver will include a hard disk for recording shows,

    Uh, no. Everybody will pull whatever they want to watch down their (real) broadband connection, as soon af we get rid of those wuzz <2 mbit DSL toys.

    conventional 30-second commercials will be rare because advertisers won't pay when most viewers can hit the fast-forward button

    This is hardly news, much less a prediction. Sophisticated product placement, onset ads (like in sports) and pay-per-view is the financing of tomorrow.

    Finally, we can talk to our computers

    I doubt it. And I don't see the real-world application, letting out for people with disabilities.
    While it may happen, for the sake of happening, the more likely thing to happen, is that user interfaces become more intutive and intelligent. In the given gas-station example it is more likely that the computer will flash a low-gas warning somewhere, and upon being asked to do so, using a set of thumb buttons, will offer driving instructions to the nearest gasstation, while not diverting too much from the route.

    That was more like $2 that two cents. I'll make it my 1.000.000 turkish lires then :-P

  201. Re:Presence exists... big brother is stalking you? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

    if your boss uses it to find out you are not sick and actually going to see Star Wars 3, then you'll hate it.

    If I have to lie to my boss about going to see Star Wars 3, then I'll already hate it. That's what "I'm not telling you" personal days are for.

  202. I know you were being funny, but.... by thinker · · Score: 1
    Because in 2012 the mayan calander ends and well all be dead anyway so who cares...
    ....for anyone interested: the Mayan calendar is cyclic, like every other one in existance.

    The survival of the human race is dependent upon the human race, not the activity of celestial bodies--until the Sun goes to red giant around 5 billion years hence.

    That does not, however, mean that we can or should ignore the effects of the activity of celestial bodies upon the Earth.

    Astrology works.

  203. Well, he missed something... by JFMulder · · Score: 2

    Aliens will colonize earth according to Chris Carter.

  204. Grading his predictions by vanyel · · Score: 2

    Here's how I would grade his 2012 predictions:

    Appliances: D

    Appliances may do self-diagnosis, and there might even be some with option
    to "phone home" but few people will avail themselves of it for several
    reasons:

    1. Too much bother to run the wiring and too expensive to do it with
    wireless.

    2. Too expensive to put in the machine in the first place, and most
    appliances are reliable enough it's not worth it --- people will
    opt for the cheaper ones.

    IM: A

    I think you're dead on with IM, both having it and the controversy.

    RFID: F

    There might be a variation on the self-scan checkouts that are happening
    already, but you won't be able to just walk out the door and have things
    charged to you. No one in their right mind would allow that sort of free
    access to their bank account. You will have to go through a checkout
    confirmation process of some sort. I would give it a C, but you
    specifically said "walk now, pay later" and that's the part that I think
    simply won't happen ever even if it's technologically possible.

    Prime Time: B

    I'm already there, though only with 1/10th the disk space. I expect I'll
    probably be in the terabyte range in about 5 years. Rather than seeing
    advertising disappear as a result, however, I think you'll see a shift to
    product placement and creation of ads that are actually entertaining in
    their own right, such as the old Taster's Choice serial ads, or the BMW
    videos they're doing at the moment (though not that lavish).

  205. I'd be all in favor -- easy to stop :-) by Ethelred+Unraed · · Score: 2

    You could be watching Friends, with a little "Pampers" ad on the bottom. This would allow for even more commercial time, and they could sell the time to sync to various moments in a program. (e.g Rachel is playing with the baby, roll the Pampers ad. They are in the coffeehouse, roll the Starbucks ad)

    And all I'd have to do to block ads is take a strip of black construction paper and tape it to the bottom of the screen. Voila! Uninterrupted commercial-free TV!

    And no TiVo hacking needed, either!

    Then suddenly black construction paper is banned by the DMCA...

    Cheers,

    Ethelred

    --
    Everyone wants to be Ethelred. Even I want to be Ethelred.
  206. Re:2012?!?! by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

    Actually since the the singularity is coming in 30 or so years, we won't really have to worry about the Unix clocks.

    --
    Why not fork?
  207. OK let's darken it a bit... by The_Guv'na · · Score: 1

    So here are my five big ideas adjusted by The Guv'na for how technology will reshape our daily regime in 2012:

    The Internet is everywhere -- and a religion.

    Almost every object we own that uses electricity will be connected to the Internet in 2012, yet we will rarely be aware of this near-universal connectivity, because so much of the conversation will be machine-to-government communication. A minority religion has appeared that worships the internet, and is rapidly growing thanks to favours and funds from the US government and corporations.

    You'll no longer be surprised to get a call from the repair center at Sears or Maytag saying you're gonna screw up the internal sensors with all that fetishwear and that your washing machine is using too much hot water and needs adjustment -- information the washing machine has sent through the Net, without any action of your part, back to the factory where it was built, and several marketing corporations.

    All present and accounted for -- always.

    Instant messaging is popular, in part, because IM software tells you which of your friends are online waiting to chat, and relays all messaging to the government's "carnivore" database, though this is strenuously denied. This concept, formally known as ``presence,'' will be extended to all forms of electronic communication.

    Family, friends, government agencies and co-workers will be able to instantly see where you are, thanks to wireless phones even tinier than what's available today and other devices with built-in GPS locators. You'll be able to specify how you wish to be reached: by text if you're busy, by voice or video if you're free. Between now and 2012, expect major controversy about the government, employers, schools and advertisers having access to your ``presence.''

    Walk now, pay later.

    Stores without doors will rely on RFID, or radio-frequency identification, tags to keep track of staff, inventory and payment. These tiny semiconductors communicate a small amount of information, such as a product serial number, when queried by inexpensive transmitter/receivers. Only recently selling for several dollars, RFID chips should cost only a few cents next year and will be smaller than a grain of rice.

    In 2012, RFID chips will sell for less than a penny and be printed onto packaging and price tags -- the beginning of the end for cash registers. You walk into a store, put what you want in a bag and walk out the door. An RFID transmitter/receiver in the entryway instantly totals up your purchases and makes a deduction from the RFID credit card in your wallet, and tells the pentagon what you purchased. If nothing else, RFID could have spared Winona Ryder her recent and very embarrassing shoplifting arrest.

    Prime time is your time.

    Every cable and satellite television receiver will include a hard disk for recording shows, and those disks will have a minimum capacity of one terabyte, or 1,000 gigabytes, enough to store hundreds of hours of high-definition programming and unskippable advertisements, determined by your purchasing and viewing habits.

    Except for special events such as the Super Bowl and the Academy Awards, no one will watch TV shows at the time they are transmitted, and conventional 30-second commercials will be rare because advertisers won't pay when most viewers can hit the fast-forward button. Major broadcast networks and traditional prime-time programming will be fading, with most ad-free entertainment sold through either a monthly subscription or a pay-per-view fee.

    Finally, we can swear at our computers and they will "understand" us, relaying our comments to Microsoft's Customer Experience Improvement Program.

    I'm recycling a prediction from 1992 that didn't come true this year but just might happen by 2012: Reliable speech recognition will allow computers, phones and household appliances to understand our spoken commands and inform the government of our mutterings when we are reading the news.

    {end edited portions}

    Ok so some of those might be tongue-in-cheek, but I still say it'll be closer! Who knows, I might just be revisiting this post myself in 2012... Spooky.

    Ali

  208. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, 2012 predicts you!

  209. A few quetions on future... by keith_nt4 · · Score: 1

    The fourth prediction, about customizing primetime, won't come true. Or at least will be about as common as electric cars are now (the exception versus the rule). The hollywood people have been trying to put rental places like blockbuster out of business since they're inception. I'm telling you this isn't going to prevelent any time soon. As for devices that store shows and movies on a hard drive that won't be very common either. People still feel the need to archive every episode of their favorite shows on some sort of media for easy storage. Not to mention the always-resourceful pirates trying to get all these things for free. Remember that short-lived version of DVD called divx (not the encoding scheme)? You bought the movie and could only watch it a few times, or a for a few days or something like that. Never took off. Cable boxes won't change very quickly. Even the new digital box I have seems rather badly made and old technology, and it's new. I expect it will have changed very little between now and 2012. It will of course still be "just around the corner". This is because there's little to motivation to improve the boxes. No competition == no innovation. Unless the cable industry is reformed in some manner to rectify this. Also free TV isn't going anywhere. There will always be people who refuse to pay the local 'evil' mega-corp a fee just to watch the latest sitcom. I would like to have seen some predictions of the security concerns that went into all this new Internet-related technology. Will hackers be able to get data via a security hole in my MS washing machine? Will houses come equiped with a firewall? What about incompatibilities? What if MS controls the protocol to the washer/dryer while oracle runs the microwave/toaster racket? Will I have to update everything like all the stupid clocks I have to reset at daylight savings time? One detail he forgot to take into account but I'm sure will be relavent: by 2012 there will be a lot of baby boomers in their late 50s/60s/70s, and they'll all be living a really really long time. Will this adversly affect the rest of us? I would say yes.

    --
    "UNIX is very simple, it just needs a genius to understand its simplicity." -Dennis Ritchie
  210. My thoughts... by John+Allsup · · Score: 2
    p.s. I've not bothered to read anybody else's, so I apologise in advance for any duplication. Here goes.

    First thought: 2012 as a year is as imaginary as 1984. But don't worry.


    Smart devices that talk to each other without human intervention, store merchandise that rings itself up for purchase and machines that finally understand the spoken word are just some of the new technologies awaiting us in the year 2012.

    Minimal intervention---not no intervention. That simple, subtle difference is all that is required to keep humans in control.


    I've borrowed many ideas from these three deep thinkers, but the predictions that follow are mine -- so I deserve all the blame for anything that looks silly 10 years from now.

    No blame. All you're doing is exploring what could be, and thinking about it so that those of us concerned about the present don't have to (all that much...)


    So here are my five big ideas for how technology will reshape our daily routines in 2012:
    The Internet is everywhere -- and nowhere.

    One word. Pervasive. An important word to understand.


    Almost every object we own that uses electricity will be connected to the Internet in 2012, yet we will rarely be aware of this near-universal connectivity, because so much of the conversation will be machine-to-machine communication.

    Yep. Laziness is good. Leave what can be left to machines to machines, and leave the proper thinking to the humans.


    You'll no longer be surprised to get a call from the repair center at Sears or Maytag saying your washing machine is using too much hot water and needs adjustment -- information the washing machine has sent through the Net, without any action of your part, back to the factory where it was built.

    I wouldn't be suprised if it happened today.


    All present and accounted for -- always.
    Instant messaging is popular, in part, because IM software tells you which of your friends are online waiting to chat. This concept, formally known as ``presence,'' will be extended to all forms of electronic communication.

    Already on its way. This is perfectly natural, and has, of course, happened with every medium of communicaition that I can think of. (Basically, people learn to get the most mileage out of any communication medium that they are offered)


    Family, friends and co-workers will be able to instantly see where you are, thanks to wireless phones even tinier than what's available today and other devices with built-in GPS locators.

    Keep in mind the importance of being able to switch these things off. Privacy must always have its place.


    You'll be able to specify how you wish to be reached: by text if you're busy, by voice or video if you're free. Between now and 2012, expect major controversy on whether employers, schools and advertisers should have access to your ``presence.''

    Yep.


    Walk now, pay later.

    Stores without doors will rely on RFID, or radio-frequency identification, tags to keep track of inventory and payment. These tiny semiconductors communicate a small amount of information, such as a product serial number, when queried by inexpensive transmitter/receivers. Only recently selling for several dollars, RFID chips should cost only a few cents next year and will be smaller than a grain of rice.

    In 2012, RFID chips will sell for less than a penny and be printed onto packaging and price tags -- the beginning of the end for cash registers. You walk into a store, put what you want in a bag and walk out the door. An RFID transmitter/receiver in the entryway instantly totals up your purchases and makes a deduction from the RFID credit card in your wallet. If nothing else, RFID could have spared Winona Ryder her recent and very embarrassing shoplifting arrest.

    But it made great fun for the tabloid journalists :-) And she is, by her profession, there to entertain us ;-)


    Prime time is your time.

    Every cable and satellite television receiver will include a hard disk for recording shows, and those disks will have a minimum capacity of one terabyte, or 1,000 gigabytes, enough to store hundreds of hours of high-definition programming.

    Except for special events such as the Super Bowl and the Academy Awards, no one will watch TV shows at the time they are transmitted, and conventional 30-second commercials will be rare because advertisers won't pay when most viewers can hit the fast-forward button. Major broadcast networks and traditional prime-time programming will be fading, with most entertainment sold through either a monthly subscription or a pay-per-view fee.

    Don't bet on that. Letting the rest of the world decide what you want to watch has its uses (it saves you the effort of having to decide...)


    Finally, we can talk to our computers.

    Don't we do that already... (e.g. You F*****G piece of S**T!!? Why don't you F*****G well work?)
    --
    John_Chalisque
  211. Smart Quotes by reidbold · · Score: 1
    Instant messaging is popular, in part, because IM software tells you which of your friends are online waiting to chat. This concept, formally known as ``presence,'' will be extended to all forms of electronic communication.
    By 2012, Smart Quotes will me fully supported.
    --
    -Reid
  212. Re:Presence exists... big brother is stalking you? by ogreinside · · Score: 1

    Just because you can circumvent presence, doesn't mean it doesn't exist and/or affect you.

    So you leave your phone at home. What if you need someone else to know your presence for that time you are supposed to be at work (or any other noble reason to skip work). Do you put your boss and any others in a "privacy" list?

    What about when you go back to work, and your boss is trying to locate you, and you have them blocked? What will they see, "user offline"?

    That's too obvious and/or troublesome. I prefer to keep my privacy. Why would you want everyone to know exactly where you are at all times?

    You can't surprise them that way.

    Ogre

    --
    "The more you suffer, the more it shows you really care, right?" -Offspring
  213. Journalists are still AOL'ers or MSN newbies by trasgu · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, it seems that journalists who write about the internet are still AOL/MSN newbies who think that AOL IS the Internet. Somehow I don't think that AOL/TW is going to innovate as much as these folks hope. Who really wants the Internet EVERYWHERE. Geez, do these people have a real life (outside of computer journalism) or care about privacy and security issues?

  214. Why 2012 Will Be Like It Is Today by http101 · · Score: 0

    Remember the movie, "Back to the Future"? Yeah it was a great movie built on the concept that people aren't necessarily greedy in every effort put forth in life. Our problem is that almost everyone out there wants to make a buck off of their "hot coffee" and all that extra legal work delays products, delays the development of new technology and the good technology usually lands in the lap of some fat bastard politician who's receiving generous kickbacks from other companies to either delay the use of it or hasten it. Its almost the year, Two Thousand and frickin' Three! Where are the frickin' flying cars and hover boards already???

    --
    -- Game Developers: Stop porting badly-textured games from crappy console systems!
  215. ON a zepplin?? by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

    Actually I'd really like to ride on a zepplin.

    Wouldn't that be a bit chiily?
    I'd rather ride in a Zepplin myself.
    (Actually, I'd rather ride in a starship, or, better yet, pilot a starship.)

    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  216. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 2101, war was beginning.

  217. Speech Recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm recycling a prediction from 1992 that didn't come true this year but just might happen by 2012: Reliable speech recognition will allow computers, phones and household appliances to understand our spoken commands.

    Flying alone down an unfamiliar interplanetary route, it won't seem to odd to say, ``Open the pod bay doors HAL'' and for the computer to reply ``I'm sorry DAVE, I can't do that''

  218. Re:Presence exists... big brother is stalking you? by gosand · · Score: 2
    if your boss uses it to find out you are not sick and actually going to see Star Wars 3, then you'll hate it.

    1. If you go see Star Wars 3, you are stupid anyway. I just broke down and rented that last piece of tripe, which I didn't go see in the theater out of protest because of Episode I. It wasn't even worth renting.

    2. If your phone is on in the theater, you need your ass kicked anyway.

    3. If you are dumb enough to sneak out of work to go see a movie, you deserve to be fired.

    Maybe you were joking, but I guess a lot of the /. crowd thinks this way. Sad, really.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  219. Re:Presence exists... big brother is stalking you? by jpvlsmv · · Score: 1

    >>if your boss uses it to find out you are not
    >>sick and actually going to see Star Wars 3,
    >>then you'll hate it.

    >Leave your phone at home?

    Leave your phone at work.

    --Joe

  220. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    I cannot overemphasize the importance of good grammar.

    What a crock. I could easily overemphasize the importance of good
    grammar. For example, I could say: "Bad grammar is the leading cause
    of slow, painful death in North America," or "Without good grammar, the
    United States would have lost World War II."
    -- Dave Barry, "An Utterly Absurd Look at Grammar"

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...