Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft's Home Of Tomorrow Has No Bathroom

Starman9x writes "Over at the The Toronto Star reporter Rachel Ross got a tour of Microsoft's home of the future. She writes with an appropriate amount of humor, given all the easy targets Microsoft has set up. While the writeup is light and witty, there is an unspoken Orwellian undertone to it -- after all, do we really want Microsoft to have that much control over things?"

393 comments

  1. 01753 567100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Now, cue the various comments complaining about this 'home of the future' just because Microsoft did it. It would be interesting to see what sort of thing Apple, Sun or Novell could come up in comparison ..

    More information on the Microsoft home is available here and here.

    Oh, and .. first post?

    1. Re:01753 567100 by macshune · · Score: 4, Funny

      "The house of the future has no bathroom.
      And I really have to go."


      Sorry, please install Service Pack 1b for the crapper.
      Have a nice day.

    2. Re:01753 567100 by cscx · · Score: 4, Funny

      Apple: The house would be see-through.

      Sun: The house would look like absolute shit asthetically, but it'd be stable, and never be able to be knocked down.

      Novell: I don't know, but there'll be a lot of guys in black ties and white shirts ringing the doorbell.

    3. Re:01753 567100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha. Good stuff.

      Question though: Why are you on Perens' foes list?

    4. Re:01753 567100 by Starman9x · · Score: 3, Insightful
      hmmm... yes, it is easy to dis it "just cuz microsoft did it", and to be honest, I'm not as thrilled today about that prospect as I would have been in, say, 1985 or so -- that was when I was just out of high school and thinking of all sorts of similar/neat things I would eventually want in my house. At that time I would not have cared whether it was "apple" or microsoft" or even "radio shack" that "implemented" them [things like a recipe lookup/display set up in the kitchen for instance] The "star trek" aspect of voice recognition [and subsequent on-the-fly voice output that "makes sense" would be insanely cool as well]

      But, the sad fact of the matter is that the "world has changed" since I was a young idealistic college freshman, and mircosoft, rightly or wrongly, has taken a position that differs from my "ideals" -- I'm the type that likes to tinker under the hood of the program, and I don't see Microsoft making all that easy to "tinker" when "the house of the future" does come around.

      Starman9x

      p.s. (of a sort) there are several mentions of "Disney" in the article, as in the dark-ride/automated event type rides, but she missed the most obvious "Disney" parallel -- The Smart House"

    5. Re:01753 567100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes .. Just the same as how your television, radio, microwave and so on are difficult to tinker with, I'm sure.

    6. Re:01753 567100 by neuroticia · · Score: 4, Funny

      Heh. Actually, AppleHome would be see-through and striped, and come in all the colors of the rainbow or a cool titanium finish that would scratch and dent. =] You could only have 1 or 2 Rooms in it (5.25 bays), but the Rooms would do everything (Superdrive/combodrive) You'd only be permitted to run AppleHomeOS on it, until someone came out with LinuxHomeOS For the AppleHome. AppleHome users would account for only 10% of the population, but would be MUCH more vocal about their love of the AppleHome than MS users.

      And if you used something in Beta, you'd erase your bedroom (iTunes, Safari)

      It would definitely have better aesthetics than Microsoft-Home, though. Eeek.

      -Sara

    7. Re:01753 567100 by Autonymous+Toaster · · Score: 1

      Now, cue the various comments complaining about this 'home of the future' just because Microsoft did it.

      Though I don't run Microsoft firmware, I agree that there's no point being knee-jerk (plus I don't have those either). Like it or not they're going to keep doing things in the world, so we may as well evaluate them honestly for what they offer, or at least for their effects on our lives. I hope we can all agree that an automated kitchen can be a good thing.

      Nonetheless in this case it seemed to me at first that this house was mainly designed to make people better little consumer automatons (hah!). The mention of making instant soup in the microwave was particularly galling.

      However, I then came across the segment where the kitchen instructs the householder in making foccacia bread - from scratch! This is really an example of how increased technology can make life better. I know I wish I had a piece of freshly baked foccacia in me right now. Mangia, mangia Will Robinson!

      So there's good with the bad. Yes, it's Microsoft, and it'll probably throw a tantrum and spread flour all over the flour sometimes (I could tell you stories), but there seems to be some thought given to actual quality of life in this home, instead of just buzzwords and marketable-looking ideas. I think that's a good sign.

      --
      Could I interest anyone in some toast?
    8. Re:01753 567100 by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I notice that you're trying to install Service Pack 1b. Since that Service Pack isn't available yet, you have to install the hot patch.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    9. Re:01753 567100 by Poeir · · Score: 1

      No, it's because before they start building these homes of the future, they're planning to replace everyone with *robots*.

      --
      Sigs are like bumper stickers.
    10. Re:01753 567100 by macshune · · Score: 1

      I was gonna say that, but I figured it was
      already common knowledge ;)

    11. Re:01753 567100 by AndroidCat · · Score: 4, Funny

      With a Microsoft-Home: if you threw a party, once the nineth person entered, the house would shut down util you upgraded your licence.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    12. Re:01753 567100 by xnixman · · Score: 1

      And you could wear anything you wanted as long as it as a black turtle-neck.

      Dan

    13. Re:01753 567100 by sryx · · Score: 5, Funny

      In the Apple House: You would always be better than your neighbors.

      In the Sun House: You would always be smarter than your neighbors.

      In the Novel House: Neighbors?

      In the Linux House: You have to rebuild it from scratch every few months but at least you got 45,312 people who will help you out (or at least call you a newbe until you read up enough to build it your self)

      In the Minux House: You wouldn't have one big house to hold everything but instead many smaller separate houses, one for each purpose.
      -Jason

    14. Re:01753 567100 by neuroticia · · Score: 5, Funny

      All the more reason to opt for a Linux-house or BSD-house. Everything's made with open technology, so when you don't like something you just have to poke around at it until it changes. You have your choice of how you want your house to look, and you can tweak it quite a bit. Plus, since it's open you don't have to go to the locksmith's when you want to change the keys. Just grind your own.

      Applehouse and MSHouse are a tad bit too restrictive for my tastes. I'll stick it out and wait for GPLHouse, even if it won't always support the latest and greatest new House-ware.

      And, of course, RedHouse will make every House-UI look alike, which will confuse you to death when you expect something to act one way, but it acts a different way... Until you realize you're in Gnome-House and not KDE-House.

      Gentoo-house would be interesting.... Quite interesting. But somehow I think that most of the population would end up making a mistake and locking themselves out of it.

      And bloody hell, the Everything-Drake Mandrake house with Toilet-drake, espressomachine-drake, chair-drake... Ok. I admit it, even the Linux-Houses will have their issues.

      This is corny.

      /me exits

      -Sara

    15. Re:01753 567100 by cscx · · Score: 1

      In the GNU/HURD House: Well... take a look for yourself

    16. Re:01753 567100 by hdparm · · Score: 1
      Windows

      A fatal exception OE has occured at 0028:C001539A. The current application will be terminated.

      * Press any key to terminate the current application

      * Press CTRL+ALT+DEL again to restart your computer. You will lose any unsaved information in all applications

    17. Re:01753 567100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Program "Toilet Master 2000" has performed an illegal operation and will be plugged.

    18. Re:01753 567100 by helix400 · · Score: 5, Funny
      Microsoft Hot Patch End-User License Agreement for MS Toilet XP.

      This EULA grants you the following limited use rights...

      1. ....you are allowed only one instance of Microsoft Toilet XP in your home.

      2. ....any attempts to disassemble, reverse engineer, etc., this toilet are illegal.
        ....If you suspect this toilet is pirated, please call 1-800-PIRACY.
        ....You may not rent, lease or lend this toilet to other users.
        ....Microsoft reserves the right to update this toilet at any time.
        ....Do not taunt Microsoft Toilet.
        ....Microsoft reserves the right to terminate this EULA. In such an event, you must destroy all traces of this toilet and its component parts.
    19. Re:01753 567100 by bettiwettiwoo · · Score: 1
      "However, I then came across the segment where the kitchen instructs the householder in making foccacia bread - from scratch!"


      Ever heard of cookbooks?!

      --
      The liver is evil and must be punished.
    20. Re:01753 567100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of sarcasm?

    21. Re:01753 567100 by Drakonite · · Score: 1

      Yes... The Gentoo-house... You can automatically upgrade from Toilet-1.2.3 to the bleeding edge Toilet-1.2.4-r1 but chances are the Toilet will become preclogged. And then when you try to install LinuxCouch manually it can't find your Floor-1.3 because GentooHouse wanted to install Floor-1.3 next to Ceiling-2.4 instead of right next to Ground-9.6.3-r12 build 2569.

      --
      Shoot Pixels, Not People!
    22. Re:01753 567100 by vivian · · Score: 1

      According to the the movie "Demlition man" the house of the future will be Linux (or some other unix) powered - you have to use the three shells. I wonder why they don't have an X-Windows compliant butt wiper though?

    23. Re:01753 567100 by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      lol that phone number in the title rings

      Recipie cards in the kitchen is the generic house of the future feature. It still sucks balls

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    24. Re:01753 567100 by hype7 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sorry, please install Service Pack 1b for the crapper.


      Can you imagine what would happen when Slammer hits that thing?

      -- james
    25. Re:01753 567100 by warnerms · · Score: 1

      It's good there is no bathroom. Otherwise when the OS crashes Shit would probably come flying out of the toilet. YIKES!

    26. Re:01753 567100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, it's because before they start building these homes of the future, they're planning to replace everyone with *robots*. MCSE'S?

    27. Re:01753 567100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the Microsoft house doesn't have a toilet, but the Linux house wouldn't have a shower.

    28. Re:01753 567100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And with Applehome, you could only buy your lamps from Apple. No other lamp would be compatible.

      Linuxhomes would be empty because they would be focusing their attention at getting the Microsoft homes to move by throwing rocks at it.

    29. Re:01753 567100 by netsharc · · Score: 2, Funny

      "It looks like you are about to urinate. Would you like any assistance?"

      and when you're
      "The application "Toilet" has an error at 0x0124FB0. The septic tank can not be "written". This Program will now terminate."

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    30. Re:01753 567100 by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      And the Windows house.

      Its a set of glass walls. You can't open them. To move air through the house they have a ventilation system, but it tends to pick up mold and viruses, requiring a take down and reinstall about every year or so.

      Since everything is made of glass, kids tend to throw rocks at it. Rather than reinforce the glass, you are periodically sent a set of "patches" to fix the glass yourself.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    31. Re:01753 567100 by MicklePickle · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually more likely to be:

      Sun: The house structure would be strong and stable, but bits would occasionally fall off, like doorhandles and drawers. You would also need great gobs of cupboard space for all that coffee.

      HP: Foundations would be a bit unstable, but the walls would be 10 inches thick, doors 4 inches thick. You would have to rip up the foundations every time you wanted to add another room.

      Linux: You would have so many rooms with so many decour choices that you'd get lost. You'd have the chance, though, to really DIY. Of course this would mean that the house would never get finished.

      AIX: Would need extensive modifications to kitchen cupboards just to install a toaster. Would require you to press the garage door opener to be able to have a shower.

      DOS: Would be a one room house with a ceiling height of 6' 40". (Why would you need it to be taller?)

      Windows: Would have to keep going out to the power board and turning the power off and on. You could only use M-rated applicances in the house. The house voltage would be 189V, (reguardless of country). And you wouldn't be able to look out of the windows half the time because of a blue haze.

      Can't readily think of any others.

      --
      -- main(s){printf(s="main(s){printf(s=%c%s%c,34,s,34) ;}",34,s,34);} $p='$p=%c%s%
    32. Re:01753 567100 by sg3000 · · Score: 1

      It would also have beautiful carpet and wood floors. The wood would be from a famous old house known for its incredible floors. The carpet would be the newest thing, thick and plush. The floors would be so stunning that everyone who saw them would want them.

      However, because of the way the floors are textured, it would take forever to walk between rooms. There would also be, for some reason, rainbow colored beachballs all over the damn house, in the weirdest places. Every time you tried to walk from the kitchen to the garage, it would take you twice as long as you would expect. And you'd see a beachball on the way. You would think, "What's up with the floors? My funky old college apartment had a crumbling foundation, but I could at least sprint between the rooms!"

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    33. Re:01753 567100 by danimrich · · Score: 1

      But, unfortunately, it is not guaranteed that Linux-House works very well with all components. If you want to hook up your new super-fast deluxe video accelerator card to the system you will only be able to use it with the monitors on the fridge and in the bathroom for gaming, because the manufacturer thinks that Windows HE compatibility is most important.

      --
      where's all that Karma?
    34. Re:01753 567100 by Old+Uncle+Bill · · Score: 1

      I don't think so. You will not be allowed to go to the bathroom, just like their developers.

      --
      Yes, I am an agent of Satan, but my duties are largely ceremonial.
    35. Re:01753 567100 by Rary · · Score: 1
      Oh, great! Now I have to upgrade my house every three years!

      I can just picture a little sticker on the front door across the seam between the door and the frame that says:

      "By opening this door you agree to the following terms and conditions...."
      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    36. Re:01753 567100 by AndFluff · · Score: 1
      Sorry, please install Service Pack 1b for the crapper

      shouldn't that be Service Pack #2?! I thought Service Pack 1b was just a Urinal on the wall...

      Just a thought

    37. Re:01753 567100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's NOT the Linux-House, it's the GNU/Linux-House!

    38. Re:01753 567100 by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      In the Linux house, upgrading your doorknob would necessitate upgrading the door, as well as the DTK (decorative tool kit) development package. Unfortunately, the wallpaper is incompatible with the new version of DTK, so that must be upgraded as well. Then scap all your appliances that were built with the old DTK, and build new ones. On the upshot, the plans are Free!

    39. Re:01753 567100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " . . . being a Linux user is sort of like living in a house inhabited by a large family of carpenters and architects. Every morning when you wake up, the house is a little different. Maybe there is a new turret, or some walls have moved. Or perhaps someone has temporarily removed the floor under your bed."
      -- UNIX for Dummies, 2nd Edition

      And my addition to that:

      "What's scary is when you realize that you *ARE* one of the architects, and all you have is a hammer."
    40. Re:01753 567100 by snd_chaser · · Score: 1

      ksh, bash, csh?

      I know how to use the three shells!

    41. Re:01753 567100 by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Since Slammer works by overflowing buffers, and then switches the target to maximum output..

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    42. Re:01753 567100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a GNU/Linux house, there would be no need for a bath or shower.

    43. Re:01753 567100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With computer screens in every room and net access, I'm sure that you could play Solitaire in the bathroom.

    44. Re:01753 567100 by sql*kitten · · Score: 2, Funny

      All the more reason to opt for a Linux-house or BSD-house. Everything's made with open technology, so when you don't like something you just have to poke around at it until it changes. You have your choice of how you want your house to look, and you can tweak it quite a bit. Just grind your own.

      And your house will arrive in the form of piles of bricks and sacks of cement, with a single photocopied sheet of paper titled "HOWTO: Build a house"!

    45. Re:01753 567100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll wait for my GNU/House thank you very much.

    46. Re:01753 567100 by KillboyPHD · · Score: 1

      I guess the Toilet would come under a "per-seat" license?

      Ba-dum-ching!

      --
      Bah weep granah, weep ninny bong!
    47. Re:01753 567100 by Santos+L.+Halper · · Score: 1

      And if you have multiple toilets in the house that are connected via the same piping, if one toilet gets a virus, do they all immediately get infected?

      --

      "Ask not for whom the bone bones. It bones for thee." --Bender
    48. Re:01753 567100 by plugger · · Score: 1

      Good analogy. Some people do just that when they build a house. Yes, it is a lot of work, but the benefit is a house customised for the way they live.

    49. Re:01753 567100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based on the events of last weekend, I think it's more likely that the Microsoft homes would be throwing rocks into the street, causing traffic chaos.

    50. Re:01753 567100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You forgot to metion: even though the *exterior* would come in all the colors of the rainbow, the *interior* will give you only two choices: aqua and slightly subdued aqua.


      Anyone caught distributing themes for the interior of your home will quickly receive a cease-and-desist order from Apple.

    51. Re:01753 567100 by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Oh no!

      The toilets locked up and the plunger isn't working!

      MS fanboy:Well no duh! Your hardware is out of date! you can't blame Microsoft for faulty hardware or drivers, can you?

      me:All I know is that the old toilet never crashed and my floor is getting covered in poopy water!

      --
      It's been a long time.
    52. Re:01753 567100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If _____ made houses you'd still be a faggot."

    53. Re:01753 567100 by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

      I suppose the GNU/HURD house would have the most elaborate foundation, but no walls or roof. However, if there were to be rooms, one could collapse without taking down any of the others.

    54. Re:01753 567100 by FCAdcock · · Score: 1

      Ever hear of a laptop?

      --
      --Forest C. Adcock--
    55. Re:01753 567100 by Uncle+Flip · · Score: 1

      Sorry, please install Service Pack 1b for the crapper.

      Erm....sorry for the scatological humour, but if it's the crapper, wouldn't that be service pack 2B?

      -UF

    56. Re:01753 567100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah no doubt...after reading that post a couple of weeks ago on the BMW 745i, I sure as hell wouldn't want a winblows controlled anything... The one thing I'd probably allow windows to control would be a dildo, cuz ya know Microsoft is gonna fuck ya...so ya might as well enjoy it :P

    57. Re:01753 567100 by FCAdcock · · Score: 1

      Maybe the Linux-houses will have their problems, but with my Knoppix-House, I can always be in a Linux-House no matter where I am.

      --
      --Forest C. Adcock--
    58. Re:01753 567100 by neuroticia · · Score: 1

      Hm. Have you installed Linux lately? Me thinks not. While Linux doesn't just take over control of your computer and make every decision on its own, certain distros like Redhat allow you to do a "Dummy's install" and the number of steps involved are extremelly limited and clear even to those who aren't entirely sure what a "Mouse" is.

      Granted, what you said DOES apply to the gentoo-house. :p But the gentoo-house is not reccomended for the general public.

      -Sara

    59. Re:01753 567100 by GoogolPlexPlex · · Score: 1

      ...and I definately don't want to know what happens when a buffer overflow occurs.

    60. Re:01753 567100 by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Oh no, not another backdoor exploit!

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    61. Re:01753 567100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you meant minix but still funny :0)

    62. Re:01753 567100 by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      All this crap becomes to be tiring. It is now to the point where everything that MS does is de facto evil.

      Can't you just try and have some kind of opinion of your own? Do you think MS is really that bad? I don't really think so.

      They don't have history for them though as they very often lead the market with crappy products. That just probably mean that if their focus was not on the tech side, on the sale side, they just outsmarted everyone of their concurrent combined.

      But for now, I think their products are pretty stable and very mature. But they have a monopoly and that is a double sided weapon: Everyone is firing at them. Maybe some kind of natural balance...

      Anyway, to get back to my point, I think I'll just avoid clicking on stories with MS in the subject or body in the future, I already know what I'm going to read:
      +5 Funny, Install SP#11242
      +5 Funny, And when that crashes, does that allow you to flush the toilets ?
      +5 Funny, ...

      Pathetic. They may have a lot of things to criticize but this is just even more pathetic.

    63. Re:01753 567100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can always pick a troll.

  2. Be glad they didn't by xpurple · · Score: 1

    Just think of what it would look like if the toilet crashed :)

    --
    http://www.xpurple.com
    1. Re:Be glad they didn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I'd hate to see the brown screen of death...

  3. aww... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no works of art that change to your liking when you enter the room? what kind of home is that?

  4. Cripes! by Icephreak1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Damn you, first poster. I was sitting here just waiting for Slashdot to release the thread for replies. Seems they set a timer on the reply action so as to not open the discussion up right away.

    Ah well, no biggie. Second post!

    - IP

  5. No bathroom by intermodal · · Score: 4, Funny

    I guess that's for consistency...windows leaves all kinds of shit all over your system, so why not your house as well?

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    1. Re:No bathroom by shri · · Score: 1

      Actually its a good thing there is no bathroom. Imagine a buffer overflow exploit being let loose on your toilet. :)

    2. Re:No bathroom by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      Actually, the bathroom was removed at the insistence of Turner Broadcasting.
      This was done to prevent you from violating your TV contract by not watching the commercials.
      After all, you wouldn't want to be "stealing" programming while living in the Home of Tomorrow.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    3. Re:No bathroom by Mike1024 · · Score: 1

      windows leaves all kinds of shit all over your system

      Would a house without Windows not be a prison?

      Michael

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
  6. the solution to productivity by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "A large number of people think (the solution to) productivity has been solved," explains Thomas Gruver, group manager for the Center for Information Work.

    Man, those Microsofters really do live in a different world. On what planet do they find people who think that they've got that productivity problem taken care of?

    --

    I write in my journal
    1. Re:the solution to productivity by sweetooth · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, maybe they've started filtering /. at the firewall. That would probably recover a LOT of lost productivity ;)

  7. no bathroo? because... by skydude_20 · · Score: 4, Funny

    its not a bathroom, but a recycle bin. it can go for awhile without emptying, just until you fill up a certain percentage of the house that you allow. actually, each partition of the house has one, though reliability can be flakey at times, oddly sucking away at all the other resources of the house (electrical, water, etc..). though for the most part works, but keeps you forever wondering why they call it a recycle bin

    --
    Jesus saves souls and redeems them for valuable cash prizes
    1. Re:no bathroo? because... by eigerface · · Score: 1

      Windows Tip # 607:

      To dispose of waste without going to the recycle bin, hit CTRL-Flush.

  8. New comment creation has been disabled on this dis by l810c · · Score: 2, Insightful
    They're givin us an hour to think up dump jokes.

    Ready...

    Set...

    GO!

    I guess we'll be takin the crash dumps in da kitchen.

    Be honest, how many times have you hit refresh since the article was posted?

  9. This is amusing, if scary... by Montreal+Geek · · Score: 0
    I can't help but think about features of the MS home: fairly user friendly, looks very nice... but given MS's track record on security and reliability I'm not sure I'd trust my front door to them.

    And there is something scary about the prospect of having to reboot your home once every so often.

    What happens when a toilet crashes? :-)

    -- MG

  10. Home of the future by drmofe · · Score: 4, Funny

    No shit!

  11. Oh great... by Arctic+Dragon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now where am I gonna put all my bathroom reading material?

    1. Re:Oh great... by l810c · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This home beams porn on the walls.

    2. Re:Oh great... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      That could make urination a bit awkward, now wouldn't it?

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    3. Re:Oh great... by jefdiesel · · Score: 1

      beaming porn is fine, its the pop ups when you want toilet paper, but keep puliing off 'ads' that really kill me

      --

      I hate spyware and spies
  12. Second post?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU FAIL IT!

  13. Wait till the power goes out! by fuzdout · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All cool till you have several generations of people who grew up with this stuff and know no other way of life and all of a sudden a big wind storm and the power is *OUT*.

    Generators would be even more necessary than now :)

    --
    Fuzdout
    ..My sig ran away. Has anyone seen my sig?
    1. Re:Wait till the power goes out! by cribb · · Score: 1

      I'm bot willing to comment on the security aspects of having so much information stored by computers, but security is always achievable by compromizing on features. But indeed, this house seems rather more like a geekish dream than something Joe Average would want. After all, not all people are willing to devote countless hours of their lives on learning to operate computers, and are even less willing to spend times for time on fixing them. after all, it's nice having a computer with a large screen in your room, you can write emails and play games on it. but the last thing i would want is a mechanical voice chanting that i need to buy diet coke when i go into the kitchen, because i'm overweight. or, for that matter, having a pda all the time around me. each time i go out, i start searching for my phone, mp3player, watch, the photo camera that gets attached to the phone, etc... and what luck! they all have batteries! so now, before i go out, i have to check if i have replacement batteries for everything with me, because, say, my mp3player's battery _ought_ to be changed in about an hour. same thing with this house: taking care of all the equipment is much more stress than benefits. after all, as i'm a geek, i'd be happy to have all that stuff. but it's nothing more than geek toys. at the moment you have a computer that doesn't infest your private life, if you want to search the net, you sit in front of the computer and do so. in this apartment, when i search the net, there'll be a mechanical voice chasing me from room to room telling me how long the search took. if i want information, i'll devote some time searching for it. having screens in every room and a voice-controlled computer won't change that. if i can't take my time and concentrate on an activity, then it will inevitabely fail, no matter how many smart computer screens there are in the room. and, ofcourse, what happens if something goes wrong with this utopia? i wait 5 minutes for the lights to go on because my kid is playing quake?

      --
      Hostes alienigieni me abduxerunt. Qui annus est?
    2. Re:Wait till the power goes out! by fuzdout · · Score: 1

      Amen to all of that!!
      It would end up just being more of an obnoxious hassel than it's worth -amusing for all of a few days or so.

      And as other people have commented, NO privacy what-so-ever.

      --
      Fuzdout
      ..My sig ran away. Has anyone seen my sig?
    3. Re:Wait till the power goes out! by Matrix2110 · · Score: 1

      Yeah! And then all your doors unlock and the monitor set facing the street starts blinking "Root me, Root me" before it all goes to black. (or BSD)

    4. Re:Wait till the power goes out! by matrix29 · · Score: 1

      Yeah! And then all your doors unlock and the monitor set facing the street starts blinking "Root me, Root me" before it all goes to black. (or BSD)

      Do I even need to make the "sexual innuendo" comment on this?

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
  14. No toilet? by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's a demo house. Would you want people trying out your toliet? And what about the customized toliet "reading material" hmmm, I think not.

    Oh, and why was comment creation disabled for half an hour? New slashcode feature.

  15. All that shit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and now where to get rid of it. tsk, tsk

  16. PDF is already used for online forms. by Gibbo · · Score: 1

    "..with the right rules set up in software many standard contracts could be quickly approved via computer assuming all the fields are filled in correctly."

    Hardly new and innovative there. It's already been possible with PDF for a long time.
    In fact government departments in Australia use PDF for electronic forms.

  17. It's an obvious answer, but... by jeeryg_flashaccess · · Score: 0

    after all, do we really want Microsoft to have that much control over things?"

    I think I speak for every /.er out there when I say very cleary, and most definately...Yes. We WOULD like Microsoft to have that much control over things.

    --
    Life is like pants... fit in or you don't fit in.
  18. Senior care.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The TV also has a message about grandma. According to the television, she is having a "normal day." Heath explains that the message is part of a larger system envisioned for senior care. Sensors in a retirement home, she explains, would monitor her activities to make sure everything's okay.

    Oh yeah, I would love to sit down to watch CSI, and be greeted with Mom fell and broke her hip, has bed sores, and vomited during bingo.

    ugh..I think I'll pass on something like that.

    1. Re:Senior care.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, I would love to sit down to watch CSI, and be greeted with Mom fell and broke her hip, has bed sores, and vomited during bingo.

      ugh..I think I'll pass on something like that.


      Ooh, yeah, because it would interfere with watching that happen to someone else's mom on CSI's TMICam.

  19. Shells by cscx · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't the bathroom of tomorrow have the three shells?

  20. Thank goodness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I don't want to have to wait for Microsoft Toilet XP to boot up. When I have to go, I have to go!

    I also don't want it to tell me that I've performed an illegal action and must be shut down.

  21. In The Home of the Future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Script kiddies will be able to turn off your fridge, lock your doors and get root on your toilet. That's assuming, of course, that The Home of the Future is as secure as current Microsoft products. If you ask me, having your entire home run on a network that will probably be accessable from the Internet is a Bad Idea. A very, very Bad Idea.

    Oh, and there's the usual Big Brother concerns. Musn't forget those.

    1. Re:In The Home of the Future... by AntiNorm · · Score: 1

      Script kiddies will be able to turn off your fridge, lock your doors and get root on your toilet. That's assuming, of course, that The Home of the Future is as secure as current Microsoft products. If you ask me, having your entire home run on a network that will probably be accessable from the Internet is a Bad Idea. A very, very Bad Idea

      Dare I ask why anybody would want to have their toilet on a publically accessible network? The only even remotely plausible reason I can come up with is a toilet that automatically checks what you leave in it for signs of disease (if I'm not mistaken, there are already toilets in Japan that do this) and can tell the doctor on their own. This isn't anywhere near a good enough reason for me to have my personal crapper wired up though. I don't want Joe Hacker to know about when I'm taking a shit, thank you very much....

      --

      I pledge allegiance to the flag...
      of the Corporate States of America...
  22. WMD by heytal · · Score: 1

    This is nothing but a hidden attempt by microsoft to create Weapons of Mass Disruption !!

    Imagine a virus which can bring down your house and your microwave and your toilet :-)
    Would the United States take unilateral action on corporations propagating technology which can be used as WMD ?

  23. First SovRus joke to make me laugh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need a new moderation option for "+1: Yes, it's a damn Soviet Russia post, but it's actually funny"

    1. Re:First SovRus joke to make me laugh! by stoops · · Score: 1

      too bad he couldn't get the "soviet russia" part right ;)

  24. Ultimate Recycler by soliaus · · Score: 1

    Well, it looks as if bill gates has finally decided to admit he is a composter.
    I wonder how those veggies taste...

    --
    Speaking at Defcon 12 - Credit Card Networks Revisted: Pen
  25. Re:Holy Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's odd .. I got my dick stuck in your dog too. Are you sure that's your dog?

  26. Closed due to damage by supun · · Score: 1

    I've heard that had to close it down due to a large amount of damage caused by two mice trying to get a piece of cheese. Even the robot janitor has quit.

    This is a common occurrence with "Houses Of The Future". Prior to this it was two dogs trying to get a bone.

    --
    :w!
  27. what?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >

    Not just no, but HELL NO!!!

  28. Great! by Latrommi · · Score: 1

    All of the home's basic functionality is available in a pocket PC-turned-light-switch.

    Just what I want...to try to turn the lights on and realize that the light switch has blue-screened.

    1. Re:Great! by demo9orgon · · Score: 1

      Hey, it gets better. Really.
      Imagine you have specific encryption keys, stuff that takes ten minutes on a 3ghz desktop to cook-up, and it's part of the whole, "This is my key, there are many like it but this one is mine" scheme. Now, imagine what happens when grandma dunks that beastie, or your three-year old uses it as a flotation device...or better yet, you do a hard-reset without thinking about it and loose everything because of a fatal error in your software used to return the unit to service (patches and software downloads on your PC which don't work because it's not the newest shinny version of the lock-in juggernaut's fleece-you plan). Wow, that sure would be fun. Just ask T-Mobile users how they like their Pocket-PC phones. I'm sure they have plenty of cheerful anecdotes.

      Now that M$ has George Orwell's future in their sights the next thing you know they'll create a medical-services division that goes on to make ICU equipment that would give Aldus Huxley's vision of the future a fresh new coat of human suffering.

      Bring on the boots, I still have teeth, you steenking M$ apologists.

      --
      Every new form of media has it's own Requirimento
    2. Re:Great! by nytes · · Score: 1

      It gets better.

      My house was built in 1957 and still has most of the original light switches in it (at around one dollar apiece).

      Compare that to the life expectancy of a Pocket PC (running the OS of your choice), at $400 a pop.

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
  29. Only microsoft.... by havardi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Can you imagine trying to read a recipe overlaid upon the ingredients you are trying to cook with? Maybe display it on the wall or something, but to imagine your worksurface limited in such a fashion and call it convienience is simply absurd.

    1. Re:Only microsoft.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How would Gnome or KDE do this? Oh, they would just project the recipie in different colors, maybe add some more tranparency effects... OH how about making it look like the Apple guys!! Those guys had stuff the floated halfway in the air! Hmm we cant do that, we'll just trick the mind......

  30. ba-boom by majestynine · · Score: 1

    Microsoft dont need toilets because they already shit on the users.

  31. The toilet is on the way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is going to be a Waster Disposal Service Patch for the house of the future. :-)

  32. A cure to productivity! by tuba_dude · · Score: 1
    "A large number of people think (the solution to) productivity has been solved..."

    Beautiful! Somebody has finally found a cure for this neferious disease.
    OR
    Has somebody solved the proof of productivity (solution being solved and all that)?

    --
    "The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion."
  33. Re:New comment creation has been disabled on this by heytal · · Score: 1

    No.. Now they want all the first posters to actually READ the article before saying "First Post" !!

    BTW, on a serious note, is this really the case ? and is it going to be a regular affair, or was it a technical glitch ?

  34. Of course there is no bathroom by MrLint · · Score: 1

    (joke first then comment)

    They just assumed everyone was gonan piss on it anyway;)

    </this commentis not pro-microsoft>

  35. No Loo? by Ratso+Baggins · · Score: 1
    So I guess the MS user would be "full of Shit"

    Fancy that?!?

    --

    --
    "we live in a post-ideological world..." - Billy Bragg.

  36. Let's put this together with MS's rep for security by carlmenezes · · Score: 2, Funny

    Conversation between 2 burglars :

    "Which house shall we pick?"
    "I've already chosen one. It's running Windows Home Edition"
    "But those have biometric scanning"
    "Yeah. A buffer overflow will take care of that"
    "I don't think so." (busy trying to hack into the wireless LAN)..."seems they've patched it"
    "Rats! I didn't want to do this. The home owners don't deserve it, but here goes...send in Slammer..."

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
  37. Re:New comment creation has been disabled on this by ruprechtjones · · Score: 1

    yeah, but at least this time I went and read the article. Maybe it's /.'s new RTFA timer...

    --
    Kip Hawley is an idiot.
  38. what about the geek's bathroom of the future? by cel4145 · · Score: 1

    wouldn't it feature an mp3 player for the shower with karaoke setting?

    or how about a large flat panel display readable from both the john and the whirlpool bath with voice activated mouse controls for reading online and watching video?

    might want to skip the vid cam :)

  39. Re:New comment creation has been disabled on this by skermit · · Score: 1

    God I hope so, it gave me time to find all the funny links that I thought the rest of the .'ers would appreciate. It's a shame when good comments don't get a viewing because in the first 30 minutes, 300 comments of goatse.cx have been posted and modded down, and and people are reading the same 25 >2 posts. That is IF they're reading at >2.

    --
    -Christopher Wu
    http://www.christopherwu.net/
  40. "day-to-day family life is made easier . . . by kfg · · Score: 1

    with microchips."

    Yo! Microchip. Go get me a beer and don't give me none o yo back talk.

    You know, I've been trying for years, but I still just can't figure out what's so hard about twisting that little rod thingy to adjust my miniblinds. It's simple, easy, quick, effective, mechanically simple and dosn't raise my electric bill.

    I don't *feel* like a Luddite.

    KFG

    1. Re:"day-to-day family life is made easier . . . by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      That's ok, I have 1 CRT in the apartment. That's my computer monitor. On the rest of the walls, I have posters. They are enlarged prints of picture taken with my camera, a 35 millimeter SLR using good old fashioned film.

      Okay the camera does have a computer in it, and while I can turn it all off and do F-stops and focusing by hand, I find the computer does a better job than my 9 times out of 10.

      That's how technology should be applied.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  41. textmessage : Grandpa pooped! by hmccabe · · Score: 5, Funny

    Some have already been tested in senior centers. It's still in the early stages of development, but such a system isn't entirely a fantasy

    Speak for yourself, lady, but my fantasy isn't monitoring seniors all day.

  42. Re:New comment creation has been disabled on this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About once every five seconds for ten minutes .. so .. mmm-mmm .. about 200 times I reckon. It worked out well though!

  43. If Microsoft Made Cars.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Every time they repainted the lines on the road, you'd have to buy a new car.

    2. Occasionally your car would just die on the motorway for no reason, and you'd have to restart it. For some strange reason, you'd just accept this, restart and drive on.

    3. Occasionally, executing a manoeuvre would cause your car to stop and fail to restart and you'd have to re-install the engine. For some strange reason, you'd just accept this too.

    4. You could only have one person in the car at a time, unless you bought a "Car 95" or a "Car NT". But then you'd have to buy more seats.

    5. Amiga would make a car that was powered by the sun, was twice as reliable, five times as fast, twice as easy to drive - but it would only run on five percent of the roads.

    6. Macintosh car owners would get expensive Microsoft upgrades to their cars which would make their cars go much slower.

    7. The oil, engine, gas and alternator warning lights would be replaced with a single "General Car Fault" warning light.

    8. People would get excited about the "new" features in Microsoft cars, forgetting completely that they had been available in other cars for many years.

    9. We'd all have to switch to Microsoft gas and all auto fluids but the packaging would be superb.

    10. New seats would force everyone to have the same size butt.

    11. The airbag system would say "Are you sure?" before going off.

    12. If you were involved in a crash, you would have no idea what happened.

    13. They wouldn't build their own engines, but form a cartel with their engine suppliers. The latest engine would have 16 cylinders, multi-point fuel injection and 4 turbos, but it would be a side-valve design so you could use Model-T Ford parts on it.

    14. There would be an "Engium Pro" with bigger turbos, but it would be slower on most existing roads.

    15. Microsoft cars would have a special radio/cassette player which would only be able to listen to Microsoft FM, and play Microsoft Cassettes. Unless of course, you buy the upgrade to use existing stuff.

    16. Microsoft would do so well, because even though they don't own any roads, all of the road manufacturers would give away Microsoft cars free, including IBM!

    17. If you still ran old versions of car (ie. CarDOS 6.22/CarWIN 3.11), then you would be called old fashioned, but you would be able to drive much faster, and on more roads!

    18. If you couldn't afford to buy a new car, then you could just borrow your friends, and then copy it.

    19. Whenever you bought a car, you would have to reorganise the ignition for a few days before it worked.

    20. You would need to buy an upgrade to run cars on a motorway next to each other.

  44. stupid preface to a useful topic by micjordan · · Score: 0

    the stupid preface "Microsoft's Home Of Tomorrow Has No Bathroom" has completely taken away any chance of there being useful conversation on this topic now. way to go morons. leave it to the slashdot crowd to completely fuck up a good thing with their incessant bitching and ranting.

    1. Re:stupid preface to a useful topic by D+iz+a+n+k+Meister · · Score: 1

      What did you think was so useful about M$ fantasy land??

      You must want to *see* more "senior care".

      --

      He painted a unicorn in outer space. I'm askin' ya, what's it breathin'?
    2. Re:stupid preface to a useful topic by Starman9x · · Score: 1
      hmmm... being the original submitter, I suppose I *should* take some offense to being called a "moron", but let me fill you in on a little secret [which you would have figured out if you read the article] it is the same headline the newspaper itself used (well, close -- the Toronoto Star simply said "the house of the future has no bathroom" rather than "Microsoft's house of the..." -- minor difference to specifically mention Microsoft in the title, but pointless anyway as this was filed under "articles, microsoft")

      Starman9x

      p.s. actually, the title I gave it when I submitted it was based more on the current "palladium/where do you THINK you're going" type .sig that many people already use; obviously Chrisd thought the paid/professionall editors at the Star are a bit better at figuring out what is "catchy" than I was with my feeble attempt at humor, for which I thank him :)

  45. So this means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    instead of using a crowbar to break in, i just need to poke out Bill Gate's eye?

  46. it's x10.com, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    a few little hacks, a couple of spy cams^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hhome automation devices, and i'm totally in the house of the future.

  47. Point to point to rant by josh+crawley · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ugh. Microsoft house. Other than the obvious "Security comments" and pissNshit
    jokes, lets get down to some seriousness. And by the way, what's with ChrisD NOT allowing comments on creation??

    ---Visitors to the house can leave a message via the touch-screen monitor built
    into the exterior wall or record a message if no one's home.

    What?? We already have voice intercomms, and some have a rudimentary X-10-like
    cam in there. Other than being a node on a network, what's soo special? Hell,
    I've even speced up a security network using Linux and such tools. ...demonstrates how a resident might enter using a retinal scanner instead of a
    key. Any such biometric screening device could be used...

    Retinal, yeah, but what about "Any biometric device"? If it's a hand print,
    gelatin (thanks to the japanese guy who 'found' it out). And to beat ANY
    biometric crap, all you need is the following:
    Eyes : Spoons
    Hands : Saw, axe...
    Face shape: Axe and cutting block... (eww)

    Point is that biometric doesnt matter. A key would probably stop that unnessary
    dismemberment.

    ---All of the home's basic functionality is available in a pocket
    PC-turned-light-switch...

    Yeah, and we can trust the wireless protocols? We cant even trust the 802.11
    encryption people, let alone MS for security. Who's to know that you could walk
    near and hijack a house computer system?

    ---It's like Web TV and a personal video recorder combined (add~~ read email
    wherever)

    Why would you want a tether like a PDA to haul around the house to control basic stuff? The last thing is to be harassed by email for this and that when my girlfriends over. Hell, I WANT CONTROL OVER EMAIL only when I'm sitting at my computer. I could give a shit less. And if it's really important, they'll call.

    And about that TV setup... Soo it's like MythTV?

    ---would monitor her activities to make sure everything's okay.

    And how would we prevent that those same sensors wouldnt be in a non-invalid
    house? Any audio/video sensor (read nearly everything) is that kind of sensor.
    If I'd have that kind of hardware, it'd be on a NON-INTERNET'ED network, with no physical connections to any network, with exception to the phone line. And that would be only for emergency phone calls (like fire sensors in roof have been set off...).

    Another thing is this auto-cooking shit. I wouldnt expect any computer can give
    reasonable instructions on how to cook. Cooking's an art, mastered by those with
    experience. How can some 2 bit computer deal with recipe substitutions cause you dont have that one good it demands? Or will it DEMAND KRAFT CHEESE when you
    bought that slab of american for 1.4$ per pound? Computers should follow MY
    rules, not the other way around.

    ---All of the computer displays in the future house will be hooked up to a
    central computer that coordinates their activities. This is critical for
    broad-based features such as homework lock-down, which parents can use to
    disable TV, music and other home entertainment until the schoolwork is done.

    Uhhh, cant that already be done with X-Windows and cron jobs?

    And of course, you gotta have that SoHo stuff for those never-off-the-clock
    business users. That's a slashdot article in all its own. Still, all this GPS
    here, Voice analysis there and add yet more buzzwords.

    Point: There's tons of stuff in any house that you dont want ANYTHING taking
    control of, with the exception of the person there. I sure dont want some
    windows security system that goes in lock-down mode whenever the cat jumps
    around knocking some book down, or have it call the fire department on a bad
    computer cooking stint. And what about errors? There's tons of bugs in this
    kind, no, ANY kind of system on this magnitude. I wouldnt trust ANY OS, even
    Linux to take care and log every little transaction in and out of my house. And
    the last thing I want is a transaction log that some law enforcement agency can
    download if they have the certain e-signature allowing such search and seizure.
    The supreme court has shown that they dont care for our rights.

    Oh well, this has turned from a objection by point to a obnoxious rant. This is
    just stuff that I worry about when "shit from the future" happens to be
    partially true. It makes me think that there's actually a way to stop it.

    1. Re:Point to point to rant by Poeir · · Score: 1

      Of course it will screw up. You'll go through a menu of voices, trying to find one you like, until you select a nice British-sounding one. Then the computer will try to kill you and steal your wife, but you won't really die. Then it's time to take an axe to the machine, only first you'll go after the water heater. Finally, you'll remove its British Charm Unit and sell it to your sisters-in-law.

      --
      Sigs are like bumper stickers.
    2. Re:Point to point to rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      right on dude.
      Gates has one idea: that if everything is connected you can chase the holy grail ( for some) of perfect efficiency. No piece of info
      need ever be entered twice, blah, blah.
      this is the same bullshit as employers who sit
      around and go if employees took one minute less
      at the can we would save Xmillion dollars.
      This works great for accounting but in the real
      world as you point out it is more trouble than
      it is worth.
      I find it really disturbing that MS thinks that
      is only natural that they seque into a company
      that has their hands in every aspect of life.
      Bill, fsck off , already.

    3. Re:Point to point to rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dismembering a person to remove, e.g., their eyeballs, will not work to fool biometrics systems. A dead eyeball is noticeably dissimilar from a live one. And house thieves are much more likely to break a window than dismember you or even try stealing your keys. (But, then, you're much less likely to lose your eyeballs.)

      Anyway, a handful of what you've said is true, especially re the reliability of such complex systems. You shouldn't have broached the, "this isn't new," argument, however. Almost every person that attacks from that angle is wrong or has missed the point. Or, as with you, both. What Microsoft proposes is an evolution of voice intercom systems, so this is entirely different from voice intercoms. This means you're wrong. And, anyway, the point wasn't, "Oh my fucking god, nobody's ever thought of these ideas before, we're brilliant and innovative!" It was the execution of the ideas; how they were all tied together and met the user's (hypothetical) needs. This is why it was setup as a HOME demo, and not a PRODUCT demo.

    4. Re:Point to point to rant by josh+crawley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're right, it's a form of a rant. Still, these things bug me. The way I write is the way I understand.

      ---Dismembering a person to remove, e.g., their eyeballs, will not work to fool biometrics systems. A dead eyeball is noticeably dissimilar from a live one.

      It is to the person looking at the 'eyeball', but a computer is stupid. If the eye retinal pattern matches, which it should being either from a live person, or 'fresh'.

      ---And house thieves are much more likely to break a window than dismember you or even try stealing your keys. (But, then, you're much less likely to lose your eyeballs.)

      I wouldnt put that against thives who do armed thieving. They wouldnt care less. 1 dead victin is one less that'll squeal.

      ---Anyway, a handful of what you've said is true, especially re the reliability of such complex systems. You shouldn't have broached the, "this isn't new," argument, however.

      And why not? The integreation on that level is new, but the rest is mostly what we have now. All they seem to add is a lot of network glue along with tons of MS 'stuff'. I dont have any issues with the networking, but I have deep issues with the ideas of transaction loggings, GPS logging, and a bunch of other things.

      ---Almost every person that attacks from that angle is wrong or has missed the point. Or, as with you, both. What Microsoft proposes is an evolution of voice intercom systems, so this is entirely different from voice intercoms.

      They just add some form of rudimentary AI along with voice recognition. My personaly opinion is neither will come along without a bit of investment in evolving firmware (via fgpa's) or emulation of vastly complicated neural nets (perhaps ASIC's on pci like slots on 'main computer).

      ---This means you're wrong. And, anyway, the point wasn't, "Oh my fucking god, nobody's ever thought of these ideas before, we're brilliant and innovative!" It was the execution of the ideas; how they were all tied together and met the user's (hypothetical) needs.

      The way I see this 'integration is tons of sensors along with a database server . The HOME-OS creates order from the basic information along with basic inputs. All this is put inside a database, perhaps 1 table to 1 room. Once you do the hard part (data-handling within the database), the rest is Plug-n-Play. And knowing MS, they'll lock in most of the varibles so no normal users can handle them (in other words, NO custimisability).

      ---This is why it was setup as a HOME demo, and not a PRODUCT demo.

      I know. But things like these give you an idea where THEY want to be in X years. Look at these kind of things as early-warning detecters.

    5. Re:Point to point to rant by Znork · · Score: 1

      Actually, a picture of an eyeball will fool a biometrics system. With some you may need to poke a hole in the picture and hold it in front of your own eye because they have those high tech thermal sensors.

      State of the art biometrics suck. Hard. If someone tries to tell you differently they're probably trying to sell you biometrics systems. Most of them are about as secure as indoors doors. The kind you have a key for... but you can use a bent nail or a screwdriver or pretty much anyting that fits in the hole to open them.

      So, the dismemberment would be extraneous. Take a picture of them instead, or use a piece of scotch tape to grab their fingerprint off a glass. Etc.

    6. Re:Point to point to rant by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 1
      Or will it DEMAND KRAFT CHEESE when you bought that slab of american for 1.4$ per pound?

      No, remember this is the Microsoft house of the future, so I'm afraid both your Kraft and American brand cheese will be incompatible, only quality full cream Microsoft cheese will interoperate with your Microsoft Kitchen Bench, Microsoft Knife and Microsoft Cutting Board. Also ensure you read the EULA on that cheese wrapper and hold the correct number of Microsoft Seat licences for your dinner guests.

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    7. Re:Point to point to rant by axxackall · · Score: 1
      Eyes : Spoons

      All leading retinal scanner vendors I knwo guarantee that "dead" eye will be recognized by absent of specific and almost hidden movement all alive eyes do.

      Speaking about biometrics, I see a bigger danger. If govt certified bio-scanner at airport scans me - they guearantee that they take only a part of my bio-info (like my private key or password) and they compare it to another part stored in their database (like my public key) and the risk of compromizing my private data is minimized (they don't store my private key).

      What is guarantee that Average Joe's son is not a member of some bad cracker club? It's not a big deal to modify their own house equipment and let all private keys stored for being compromized in future. If I am a post office worker or some other service man or just a guest, I don't want my data to be scanned by some private scanners.

      --

      Less is more !
    8. Re:Point to point to rant by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      "It is to the person looking at the 'eyeball', but a computer is stupid. If the eye retinal pattern matches, which it should being either from a live person, or 'fresh'."

      it is to the computer too, contrary to what you see on scifi movies/shows(now, how it is different evades me at the moment, but iirc the eye transforms a bit or something like that, the pupil turning something it shouldnt or something similar).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    9. Re:Point to point to rant by swillden · · Score: 1

      It is to the person looking at the 'eyeball', but a computer is stupid. If the eye retinal pattern matches, which it should being either from a live person, or 'fresh'.

      Ah, no. The "pattern" on the retina is actually the tracery of blood vessels in it. These vessels change shape, color and size when no blood is being pumped through them. In addition, the shape of the eyeball changes when it's removed from its socket, which also distorts the pattern. Finally, as other bits of the eye die from lack of nourishment, they change as well; I believe the cornea turns opaque, the lens may get deformed, I think even the vitreous humor changes in important ways, thought I don't recall what.

      I wouldnt put that against thives who do armed thieving. They wouldnt care less. 1 dead victin is one less that'll squeal.

      Maybe, but only for the most hardened and least risk-averse. Criminals don't tend to be the brightest bulbs around, but they're well aware of the different consequences attached to burglary, aggravated burglary and murder 1. The difference between the first and second is dwarfed by the difference between the second and third.

      Personally, I think they're much more likely to simply bypass the doors entirely. Breaking a window is one way, but if that can't be done due to the alarm system they could just take a page from the Beverly Hills burglars of a couple years back -- they just used a chainsaw and cut right through the wall.

      The integreation on that level is new, but the rest is mostly what we have now.

      Actually, I think it's less new than that. Take a look at what's been done at the MIT Media Lab in their various projects, particularly House_n. They're even getting ready to take the next step and move it out of the lab entirely, building a complete house (with a bathroom!) where people will actually live and work for weeks or months while MIT researchers study the ways in which they interact with the intelligent home.

      But you're certainly right that there is no fundamentally new technology here. It's just integration. For that matter, some of my colleagues in the IBM Global Services Wireless e-Business group have been focused on smart homes and smart autos for a couple of years now -- and Global Services is the division of IBM that focuses on real-world integration contracts, not the R&D arm that engages in blue-sky thinking or even the product development arm that builds on spec (the "build it and they will buy" model of most product development).

      Nope, no significant innovation here.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    10. Re:Point to point to rant by caveat · · Score: 1

      ---Dismembering a person to remove, e.g., their eyeballs, will not work to fool biometrics systems. A dead eyeball is noticeably dissimilar from a live one.

      Not if you kidnap them, bring them alive and kicking right to the front door, then either hold their head up, or if they don't cooperate, you dig their eye out and hold it up on a pen in front of the scanner - ~30 seconds shouldn't make a difference in the freshness...haven't any of you seen Demolition Man?

      --

      Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    11. Re:Point to point to rant by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Most face scans can be fooled with a picture.
      Retna scan just isn't all we thought it would be, thanks to over use in Sci-fi shows.

      I just wonder if there is a man behind the curtian at these shows.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:Point to point to rant by Reziac · · Score: 1

      While reading your comments (which I basically agree with) .. I had this vision of the homeowner catching a cold and the voice recognition system having a problem because the user is hoarse and doesn't sound like himself. Now there's a perfectly realistic glitch point.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    13. Re:Point to point to rant by Patrick · · Score: 1
      ---All of the home's basic functionality is available in a pocket PC-turned-light-switch...

      Yeah, and we can trust the wireless protocols? We cant even trust the 802.11 encryption people, let alone MS for security. Who's to know that you could walk near and hijack a house computer system?

      That's not wireless, actually. The PDA-turned-switch is mounted to the wall. It gives residents control over lights, locks, music choices, and phone messages from something roughly twice the size of a normal light switch.

      I wouldnt expect any computer can give reasonable instructions on how to cook. Cooking's an art, mastered by those with experience.

      Bah. Ever heard of a cookbook? Even good cooks use cookbooks occasionally. The nifty ceiling-mounted-projector, RFID-tag-reader auto-cooking system in the MS Home is just a glorified interactive cookbook. I wouldn't mind being able to ask a cookbook to show recipes that don't require eggs (I'm out of eggs) or that are low in sodium, for example.

      And the last thing I want is a transaction log that some law enforcement agency can download

      Who says the house is logging all activity? Turning on the lights and the music when I come home is stateless. The system doesn't have to remember a month from now what time I came home, whether I brought anyone with me, which RFID-tagged groceries I was carrying, and so on. It's just turning on the lights, after all.

      I agree that MS's model home is a little over the top, but I think that's the point. It's a hodge-podge of technologies that people might opt to buy three to ten years down the line.

    14. Re:Point to point to rant by Galvatron · · Score: 1
      I actually wrote a crappy short story for school back in Freshman year of high school that involved some bioengineered pet that Bill Gates IV brings home to his family going haywire and attacking him. In the struggle, Gates the Forth tries to call Microsoft for help, but because the pet kicked him in the crotch (it was a man-sized two legged lizard, like a small Godzilla or something), the voice recognition system wouldn't admit him as someone who was covered by their home security plan.

      Whatever, it was a stupid story, but your comment reminded me of it.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    15. Re:Point to point to rant by krogoth · · Score: 1
      All of the home's basic functionality is available in a pocket PC-turned-light-switch...

      Why not throw in the rest of that paragraph?


      The tiny computers are embedded in the walls...


      There's nothing there that says it needs any kind of wireless connection.
      --

      They that quote Benjamin Franklin on liberty and safety deserve neither.
    16. Re:Point to point to rant by Reziac · · Score: 1

      [grin] And talk about the sins of the fathers being visited upon the sons.. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    17. Re:Point to point to rant by Galvatron · · Score: 1
      It's kind of funny, I wrote this so long ago (8 years) that I didn't even particularly dislike Microsoft. I just was writing about a bioengineered lizard (the assignment was to write a story about an illustration we were given, which was of a giant lizard hanging an ornament on a Christmas tree), and so I figured I'd make it a prototype from the Microsoft of the future.

      You know, the phone numbers in my story were also 13 numbers long. Looking back, it's almost prophetic :)

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    18. Re:Point to point to rant by Reziac · · Score: 1

      "Predicting made it happen; I didn't mean to do it!!" -- Lloyd Biggle Jr.

      So, now how do you explain Quincy? :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  48. Other companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fortunately the "other companies" can't oblige because THEY'RE TOO BUSY WORKING!

    1. Re:Other companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I imagine that house took a good deal of hard work.

  49. Re: IN AMERIKA by The_Dougster · · Score: 1

    Im Amerika das scheissenpapieren ist bergotten uns des UberMarketten mit dein plastchekarten.

    --
    Clickety Click ...
  50. No bathroom? Allow me to offer: by mattACK · · Score: 1

    The eToilet. Where do YOU want to go today?

    --


    "My God, this must be a truly remarkable corn chip, to be so widely and confidently touted."
  51. Re:Holy Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF are you guys doing to my dog??

  52. Its a criminals dream by PhillipC · · Score: 1

    Hack into a home's computer system, and know exactly who is in the house at any given time as well as when each family member is expected home. Talk about convenience.

  53. IMHO, BAD JOURNALISM by xo0m · · Score: 1

    "The house of the future has no bathroom.
    And I really have to go...There's a fully furnished front hall, foyer, living room, bedroom, kitchen and dining room: all tweaked with future tech. But no porcelain throne...The lack of loo is amusing, but understandable..."

    if ur gonna make a point, stick to it. don't concede to microsoft that toilets arent necessary in a "futuristic model" just because its a "model".

    i'm sure there are plenty of tech toys to add to the restroom...has anyone ever seen the home improvement "man's bathroom"? it'd be nice if they built upon that and included it because, hey...we need restrooms!!! if not, please direct me to the M$ powered outhouse...lets hope the toilet doesnt...crash ;)

  54. Wellcome Home Bob! by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 5, Funny


    Imagine walking home... it's been a long day.

    As you enter, you are greeted by a warm Muzac entry sound. "Welcome Home" It chimes in an even, an unoffensive voice.

    As you walk in, you are followed by wall mounted screens delivering custome tailored advertising. Who knew I could grow another 6" safely and without any effort?

    You hang up your coat and you are chimed by a tone, that says "Thankyou for using MS coat rack" Ding!

    You go to the kitchen to put away groceries, but before you get there a 6 foot holographic paper clip stops you. "Your grand mother is not eating her food. Do you wish to feed her"

    "No it's ok, I'll talk to her later Mr. Clippy"

    "Are you SURE you dont' want me to feed her. It's not healthy for her not to eat"

    "She's made it 80 years on her own Sir, she knows when to eat"

    "Older peopler need to eat, human, or they could starve!"

    "Fine, what ever. Give her some food"

    You can hear sounds of mechanical arms wurring in the distance, and an old woman screaming... ugh just another bug.

    You go to put away the food, but as you insert some fruit and turn around, you see it spit out of the fridge. "What now?!"

    "This fruit is not compatible with this refridgerator"

    "It's a banana you talking box of ice, just take it"

    "MS Fridge 3.1 does not recognize this typen of fruit. Are you sure you want to store it in MS Fridge?"

    "YES!! I want to store it in MS Fridge!!"

    "Open the door manualy to continue."

    You put away the rest of the food, with only a few more discussions regarding the unlicensed eggs, which aparently were not grown at McMSoft Farms, and therefor do not have the correct nutritional value. And the fit the cubbard through over you buying flower... It insists that MS Breads are a more efficient use of your leasiur time.

    As you go to the TV, you realize that you won't be watching TV tonight since all that's on is the BSD show.

    Sudenly out of nowhere a lazer shoots you inthe pocket and burns a hole, destroying a tape you had in your pocket. "Hey!! what was that?"

    "You were carrying ilegaly coppied music. I have corrected the issue for you."

    "It was a mix tape from a friend!!"

    "All copyrighted materials must have digitial copy right signitures, or they may be stolen. You don't want to steal do you?"

    "It's from his band you nit! Never mind, I'l just go take a shower"

    You dissrobe (hoping the computer isn't watching this time) and turn on the shower.... ICE cold.

    "Computer turn up the heat, please"

    "The heat is on"

    "No it's not, it's freezing"

    "The watter is hot at 37 degreees"

    "In Celcius!!"

    "Error: Unknown variable.... Reporting bug.... Bug fix will be available when you upgrade to MS House XP: The Next Generation"

    You scream into the night as you run naked into the woods, trying to escape the MS Tree 3000's (better greener foilage). You find your self a nice cave and grow hemp in the field. Not because you like hemp, but because you heard it causes memmory loss, and you want to forget.

    1. Re:Wellcome Home Bob! by Jester998 · · Score: 1

      Damn, that's the funniest thing I've read in a while. Kudos!

    2. Re:Wellcome Home Bob! by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not to mention being bombarded with:

      (in the shower): "At Last-- You can flush away excess Pounds and Inches BEFORE they attach to your body! Lose up to 22.5lbs in the next 3 weeks!"

      (as you walk out to the garage): "Save 40% on insurance! Compare insurance quotes from some of the most trusted names in insurance. A fast and easy way to shop for individual or family quotes.
      The original online Insurance Service. Ten years Online! GUARANTEED!"

      (as your wife leaves to go shopping): "Is she really going where she says? Brand-New VERSION 8.2 Just Released: Astounding New Software Lets You Find Out Almost ANYTHING about ANYONE..."

      (and, after she finds out you've been snooping, and filed with MSDivorce version 1.0): "Hello, I started a new website for women like me - Married & Lonely. We're looking for guys like you ! PUSH THIS NOW TO SEE US !"

      (and finally, ALONE in the bedroom) "Bob, #1 DOCTOR RECOMMENDED PENIS ENLARGEMENT FORMULA. In just a few short weeks, you'll watch with amazement as your penis grows into the biggest, thickest, hardest tool imaginable - the one you've always fantasized about having! No penis enlargement system is faster, easier to use, or more effective than MAG-RX+.

      That's all I want. LifeSpam.

      [sampled quotes not meant to advocate any product, just a tiny snippet of the email CRAP that I get that Outlook's junkmail 'filter' leaves untouched in my inbox.]

      --
      -Styopa
    3. Re:Wellcome Home Bob! by mlknowle · · Score: 1

      >"I find TV highly educational. Every time someone turns a TV >on, I go in the other room and read a book."-Marx

      Is there any point in raising the complete anachronism in your sig?

    4. Re:Wellcome Home Bob! by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Why am I reminded so strongly of D.F. Jones' novel "Colossus: The Forbin Project" ... ??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:Wellcome Home Bob! by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 1

      Grocho is never out of style!

  55. "Microsoft's Home Of Tomorrow Has No Bathroom" by Trikenstein · · Score: 1

    No Shit? /bow

  56. sorry for this but it has to be said. by xeniten · · Score: 1
    "Microsoft's home of the future was reminiscent of a Disneyland tour, their model office has Epcot center nailed."


    That makes sense considering both companies are mickey mouse operations.


    *insert rimshot here*

    --
    Romana: "How did you know?" Doctor Who: "Ah, well, knowing is easy. Everyone does THAT ad nauseum. I just sort of hope"
  57. Slashdot Articles of Tomorrow Force You To Read by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    I love the new feature! While waiting to post "In Soviet Russia Your House of Tommorow Has No Toliet Paper" or some bit of fall-out-of-your-chair, LOL!!OLO!MFG! hilarity, I actually *read* the story.

    I read the whole thing.

    A whole new world has opened up to me! I can make intellegent comments that are ontopic! I can rationally discuss the issues! I can send a Fax from the Beach!

    And the people that will bring it to me? A&chrisd!

  58. Just like in Star Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It really is accurate!

  59. Not exactly an E-ticket ride by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    Interesting, but I think I'd find a lot of the features more annoying than useful.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  60. Obligatory Bathroom Humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wow...all that technology and no place to log in!

  61. Re:"Microsoft's Homo Of Tomorrow Has No Bathroom" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was pretty good...

  62. ABU HAZMA IS A TROLL ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and everyone bites. Morons.

  63. unspoken ... by j1mmy · · Score: 1

    ... because it isn't there? Does everything Microsoft have to be Big Brother?

  64. Bathroom of the Future! by Tsali · · Score: 2, Funny

    Microsoft couldn't improve the bathroom of tomorrow? Come on! Where's the innovation?

    My ideas....

    - Auto-sensor for build up of noxious odors.
    - Wireless connect in bathroom, naturally.
    - A scale that keeps track of who is on it so it knows when to lie.
    - A soap container that doesn't leave a white-yellow wax pond.
    - An XBox to hold my toothbrush (doubles as a hair dryer).
    - A medicine cabinet mirror that Photoshop touches up your appearance before you go out. Even better, a mirror that dims to match the ambience of a bar you are going to so that you can see exactly how pretty you are before your true looks are discovered.
    - Temperature sensing based on biometrics.
    - Flat panel for pornographic - er - custom content viewing.
    - Any old style RIAA literature to shit on.
    - A toilet that doubles as a bidette (sp?) - with override.

    I would take the trip to Redmond to see that one.

    As it is, I hope they have newspaper on the ground.

    T.

    --
    This space for rent.
  65. What if something goes wrong? by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    Not that someone would think that any Microsoft products could have bugs, but... well shit happens.... maybe is for that that the house has no bathroom

    1. Re:What if something goes wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /tttttttttvgg

  66. Previous examples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought that it was very telling some years ago when MS did a survey of home computer users. They determined that the computer was in the same room as the TV and VCR and concluded that home users wanted computers, TVs and VCRs to be together so they could all be used at the same time.

    Well, duh, NO, it is because most homes don't have a few spare rooms in their 'mansions'.

  67. Microsoft Bob by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

    Of course there's no toilet. That's what "Microsoft Bob" was designed for. You simply excrete your waste while performing standard household tasks, without interruption - and Bob cleans it up! Amazing!

    --
    I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
  68. Why it has no bathroom by phorm · · Score: 1

    All of Microsoft's crap goes into your PC... you don't need a bathroom!

  69. heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the moderators are up to something... When i read the article it said that there were 69 good comments... all i have to say is use a condom moderators and may your karma go up and cure the hangover you will have in the morning...

  70. Erroneus assumption: by voidref · · Score: 1

    "I get a message from another co-worker that Contoso's big cheese is slated to go on TV in two hours. He'd like to
    announce a new line of widgets too, one that's faster and cheaper than silly Fabricam's. We have such a widget in
    development but I'll have to find out if we have the facilities to speed up production so we can beat Fabricam to
    market."

    She should have added:

    "I save all the effort and just lie, after all, Microsoft does it all the time."

  71. Ga Tech's been doing this for a while now.... by Tmack · · Score: 1
    I live next door to the house they built. It was finished just when I moved in, as I was taking the place of someone moving into it. Sounds like MS is re-hashing the same stuff being done here, specifically senior care. IIRC the house here has motion detectors in the hallway to automagically turn on lights, other sensors to make sure they are taking the right meds, and others to call for help if they've fallen and cant get up. The big difference being the people are actually LIVING in this house full time.

    Tm

    --
    Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
  72. A great shame for Ally McBeal fans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That PocketPC remote might have shown good promise as a replacement for John Cage's remote control toilet flusher.

  73. Y2K by thomasj · · Score: 1

    It seems like Bill Gates has problems with bathrooms. :-)

    --
    :-) = I am happy
    :^) = I am happy with my big nose
    C:\> = I am happy with my OS
  74. No toilet?! by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

    No toilet?! No shit?!

  75. I forgot too... by questforme · · Score: 1

    Home Economics class back in High School. One of the projects we did was to design our dream home, I spent alot of time on it and when I went to show it to my friends all they could say is, "where's the bathroom?". Yes, it was true, no bathrooms. Kind of a weird DejaVu when I saw the title to this posting.

  76. stupid house by cebe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These digital homes of the future will only be as smart as the owner. People will yell and scream and curse at their house just like they do to their printer. The main server that runs the whole party will require pretty good knowledge of computers. Unless of course, you are rich and have a 24 hour geek squad a phone call away. Technical difficulties will arise, upgrades will need to be done, and to do it yourself (economically) will require *wanting* to know the guts of the system. Not to mention, a bit of knowledge about whatever language is making everything tick. The interesting thing about these "future" homes is that they are just a concept right now. They will become widely built and used only if simplicity is pursued by the people designing and building them. Whoever comes up with a very simple GUI for some "master controls" that doesn't require every single appliance, light, alarm, and garage door opener to be compliant to only one protocol, or worse, MADE BY MS, will be a very rich person. Of course, the average /.'er could handle the 'super house' (and most likely would not let any other person put their muckers on the design and implementation of it), but the average 'i have 40 gigabytes of ram!' person won't be able to.

    More importantly, Microsoft doesn't have a single view of the future. The tours present possible scenarios, not a blueprint for product development.

    This is the most important part of the article. Not everyone will want *everything* that MS's digital home showscases... but customizability (is that a word?) of these future homes will be the key. Opting for the econopackage presented by your home builder would be a bad idea. A home owner would end up without enough features that they could make good use of, and too many things that they don't need, or worse, don't know how to work.

    It will be interesting to see how these become mainstream.

    --
    You have paid for a total of 0 pages and so far 0 have been used up (0 today).
    1. Re:stupid house by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      The most important feature: How easy it would be to overclock the house?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  77. I like the central computer thing... by Peterus7 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Because...

    All of the computer displays in the future house will be hooked up to a central computer that coordinates their activities. This is critical for broad-based features such as homework lock-down, which parents can use to disable TV, music and other home entertainment until the schoolwork is done.

    "That feature's not popular with teens," Heath says.

    You know kids would just find a way around that, to hijack the main computer for their own sinister uses while blaming it on gator or something.

    1. Re:I like the central computer thing... by D+iz+a+n+k+Meister · · Score: 1

      You know kids would just find a way around that, to hijack the main computer for their own sinister uses while blaming it on gator or something.

      I think you're forgetting that this would be a M$ computer. The only hijacker on the computer would be Bill Gates.

      Not to mention the fact that this feature will bring about a new society of peace and love, beccause parents won't have to be responsible for kids doing their homework. M$ will provide that service for them. Though the software will still only be provided as-is, with no homework-completion warranties expressed or implied.

      --

      He painted a unicorn in outer space. I'm askin' ya, what's it breathin'?
    2. Re:I like the central computer thing... by Peterus7 · · Score: 1
      Wait, this is the future, so kids would use their psychic powers along with their martian built neural interface to finish their homework in nanoseconds, so it wouldn't matter anyways!

      And of course, in the future, Microsoft still runs everything, and Bill Gates is still claming down on people's lives. Bill Gates is the big brother of the future.

      Oh well, I always wanted an older sibling.

    3. Re:I like the central computer thing... by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      You know kids would just find a way around that, to hijack the main computer for their own sinister uses while blaming it on gator or something.

      It will be a cold day in hell when my kid can out hack me. That "main computer" was just my honeypot muhahaha!

    4. Re:I like the central computer thing... by Peterus7 · · Score: 1
      Yeah, well, it'll be a cold day in hell when my parents can out hack ME.

      The thing is imoho, a lot of kids are a lot more tech savvy than their folks, so perhaps their folks should let off and let their kids have computer time instead of trying to block it.

      Or even better, have a good parent-kid relationship so homework gets done AND internet stuff happens, because a lot of the time when parents try to restrict kids internet stuff, especially with netnannys, it's the kids who will win. (imoho, and in my experience.)

  78. No Imagination by cyril3 · · Score: 1
    Light emitting diodes (LEDs) on the ceiling behind a valance cast rich colours on the wall that change as she reads and sound effects are added accordingly. A faint ring plays in the background when she says the word telephone and the walls turn green, then red to correspond with the colours in the story. When the fictional cow jumps over the moon, a simple image of a cow in full flight appears on the television screen.

    Have these people ever actually read to a child. I mean part of the idea at least is for children to use their imagination but if you're going to swamp them with colours, sounds, and animation (on the TV fer chrissake) why bother reading. The sound just becomes another input.

    It's like "Here kid, this is what it's supposed to look like OK. Whadayamean you want the cow to be a whitwe with black spots? Microsoft cows are brown."

    It's not supposed to be entertainment.

  79. i disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i disagree

  80. Yet Another Lame Joke by jsse · · Score: 1

    Microsoft wins stay of Toilet order

    Microsoft received a reprieve on Monday from a court order requiring the company to install Plumbing INC's toilets. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted Microsoft a stay of a Jan. 21 decision from U.S. District Judge J. Frederick Motz in Baltimore, who gave the company 120 days to begin including Plumbing INC's toilet in every establishment of Microsoft Home(tm).

    In a statement sent to reporters, Plumbing INC's vice president of legal affairs said: "We regret the 4th Circuit Court's decision. The preliminary injunctions granted by the district court will benefit consumers and the plumbers."

    Plumbing INC has sued Microsoft for $1 billion, claiming Microsoft had tried to thwart the commercial success of toilet in hopes of establishing .Diaper as an alternative.

  81. watching granny... by mrselfdestrukt · · Score: 1

    I like the part where sensors in the retirement home are keeping an eye on grandma and tells you that she's had a "normal day". Imagine getting an update about the day when Grandma decided to stuff society, lighted a joint , burnt her bra and started to get it on with old mr. Smith in the room next door.

    --
    "I used to have that really cool,funny sig ,but it got stolen."
    1. Re:watching granny... by fuzdout · · Score: 1

      That's when you're told that Grandma has been a very, very bad girl.

      --
      Fuzdout
      ..My sig ran away. Has anyone seen my sig?
    2. Re:watching granny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      knowing my own hell raising, harley-riding gran...

      what if that IS the normal day? :)

  82. Recipes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Recipies are always the main obstacle being overcome in the future home. "For God's sake Jenkins!!! Solve this Recipe Problem right now!"

  83. The reason... by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

    They omitted the bathroom in the demo, because engineers haven't been able to unlink the toilet flushing sound from this wav file. (Seems an irate employee hid the code deep in the OS, and the ones who are left haven't been able to locate it yet...)

  84. Touch screen at the front door by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "...visitors can leave a message using a touch screen at the front door". Touch screen? Oh YEAH, I can just imagine how long THAT would last before the neighborhood teenagers vandalized it.

  85. my silly kneejerk anti-MS sentiment by jdbo · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I would absolutely _love_ to go through the future-office part of the tour:


    Gruver leads us down a darkened hallway of the office of the future while he sets the scene for the tour. I'm now an employee of Contoso, widget maker extraordinaire. To reinforce the point, Gruver motions to a computer display with several names listed on it, including my own. It's kind of scary. I have no idea how much a widget maker earns and I've got a family to support.

    As we watch a video message from a fellow employee, dramatic lighting and sound effects punctuate a high-speed storyline of corporate intrigue.

    Another ficticious firm, Fabricam, has announced the Widget Plus. It's better than the widget we have on the market and it could crush or financial dreams if we don't act fast.

    I feel my hatred for Fabricam bubbling up. I must defeat them!

    ...

    I get a message from another co-worker that Contoso's big cheese is slated to go on TV in two hours. He'd like to announce a new line of widgets too, one that's faster and cheaper than silly Fabricam's. We have such a widget in development but I'll have to find out if we have the facilities to speed up production so we can beat Fabricam to market.

    ...

    Just when we've solved the problem, a helpful employee chimes in with a video message telling us they don't have the right robots to get the job done on time.

    But wait, we've got enough time to sign contracts with other production facilities, with a few seconds left over to relay this info to our boss. A video window appears on the big screen. It's our boss on TV telling the world about our new line of better, cheaper widgets.

    Whew! We sure showed those guys at Fabricam!


    While the reporter certainly played up this aspect of the tour, the impression I get is that there's no aspect of MS's corporate culture that isn't touched by a hyper-competitive worldview. The fact that this shows up in the marketing of their "office of the future" would indicate that they feel this is something that anyone might identify with... which feels like a corporate-level unconscious manifestation, similar to automatic writing / free association.

    (smile already, I'm only part-serious.)

    What I can't decide whether this section of the tour is an amazing instance of idealized projection by MS's marketing staff, or an example of how a good marketing team can identify with situations completely unfamiliar to them (i.e. being genuinely threatened by a competitor).

    (yes, that was sarcasm...)

    Sure, I'm overstating the situation, and sure, their target audience for this tour is really high-level execs who - to some extent - are paid to view the world this way.

    Still, it's a pretty sad when even in the magical future the CEO schedules press conferences without having a clue as to what he's going to say; maybe MS should look into building futuristic, non-stupid executives.

    Oh well... here's hoping those fictional robots go on a fictional killing spree!
  86. Pie in the sky? by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 1

    I want to call this a Metcalfe's Law problem or a Convergence problem only because it's almost 2am here and I can't think...

    But I can't get my doctor to send me paper mail about my next appointment or recent test results. School is lucky if it knows where my child is supposed to be, much less keeping me up to date beyond the static class schedule. What are 200 hundred radio frequency tags in my shopping cart going to do to my grocery bill? Reminds me a bit of the defunct WebVan: "OK everybody we have this great service, EVERYONE better adopt it QUICK or it's doomed. Hello? Hello? Where is everyone?"

    Also, the US population isn't growing that fast. How about helping us economically retrofit existing houses with current technology? Or should we just turn them into Low Income Projects and sprawl out even further to build our MS Homes?

    --

    Operator, give me the number for 911!
  87. The Only House of the Future in Washington... by DredPirateRoberts · · Score: 1

    ...Will be Bill Gates' mansion, because he's the only person who'll be able to afford to own a house out here!

    --
    "All animals are created equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - George Orwell
  88. Home Automation is Hard by Thomas+Wendell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My wife and I are nerds and have designed automation into our home. We have systems for security, lighting control, media equipment control and HVAC all talking to each other via serial and Ethernet. We are programming everything ourselves, because we can and because we think we'll do a better job than anyone we could hire.

    We've been in the house for six months and haven't finished the lighting controls. It takes a while to figure out how you want things to work. Everything works reasonably well and some things are really cool.

    However, anything more complex than having a button that turns out all of the lights when you're ready to shutdown for the evening gets surprisingly subtle.

    For example, we programmed the system to automatically turn on the hall lights when we get home. The rule is simple enough, if this door opens, and it's between sunset and sunrise, turn on this light. But then, we have a warm winter and get a lot of bugs on the entry and when I take out the garbage, I turn off the light so the bugs don't swarm into the house, then open the door and the light comes back on!

    We easily fixed this, but what happens to tomorrow's consumers who buy a mass-produced system that tries to be a LOT more clever than what I just described and it goes wrong? These are the people who couldn't figure out to set the time on their VCR, who don't know how to turn off Word's autoformatting "features" and instead have to learn how to work around them. How are they going to live in a home that is complex beyond their comprehension and that does things they don't want and can't fix?

    The answer is they won't. This high-tech home automation for the masses is a fantasy. Software is going to have to get orders of magnitude better before it's even thinkable.

    1. Re:Home Automation is Hard by UnknownQ · · Score: 1

      But one thing your forgetting is that the homeowners of the future will be those kids the parents are asking for help with that dumb VCR. As a member of that people group (I'm 16) I can tell you the geek to jock ratio is looking better all the time.

      --
      Wherever you go, there you are!
    2. Re:Home Automation is Hard by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      I think Marvin Minsky said it best:

      You can't push string.

      Our world is made up a a thousand little rules that a computer will be oblivious to until somebody writes them down. (Or more specifically, writes them in a way that allow the rules the system learns to integrate with other rulesets. Learning is easy. Remebering is the hard part.)

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    3. Re:Home Automation is Hard by swillden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But one thing your forgetting is that the homeowners of the future will be those kids the parents are asking for help with that dumb VCR. As a member of that people group (I'm 16) I can tell you the geek to jock ratio is looking better all the time.

      As a member of the group that thought exactly the same almost 20 years ago when *I* was the geek hacking on my little computer and fixing the VCR for my parents, I can tell you that you're wrong. Human nature hasn't changed and won't change. It's not that people are too dumb to figure out how to set their VCR clock (most of them, anyway), it's that people don't have time or the intellectual energy to deal with crap that doesn't just work. Most people aren't "fiddlers" by nature, and it's only those of us who *enjoy* messing with crap like that who are willing to do it.

      Heck, even those of us who like it get tired of it. I have nine or ten computers in my home, run my own mail and web servers, have a wireless network, etc., because I think it's fun. But, you know what? It's also fragile as hell (or at least it often seems that way) and I'm getting tired of screwing with it all. I rarely go more than three or four months without some sort of a problem. Even though most of the machines run Linux and are pretty trouble-free (the one Win2K box gives me more trouble than the rest of them put together), I still end up having to fight with problems with the mail server (which is used by about 30 people as their primary e-mail, so when it has problems I'm in trouble), or my VPN connection to the office goes down, or the mobo in my desktop starts flaking out, or I have to go tweak my firewall and intrusion detection system to make sure I'm not going to get hacked, or the printer sharing stops working, or my wife's USB wireless network adaptor flakes out and takes the USB mouse with it, or ... I'll stop here, but I could go on for pages. And then there's the huge pile of stuff that I'd still like to make all of this equipment do -- but after writing code for ten hours a day, I need time to keep up with all of the other crap I have to do (matter of fact, I've got to go fix the snowblower now; oh, and that tub drain is still leaking), *and* I'd really like some time to spend with my wife and kids, etc., plus indulge myself a bit in other things I enjoy.

      So, my VCRs blink 12:00, and my kernels run untuned, and my IDS logs go unreviewed while I take my kids ice skating. I dread those mornings when my wife (ever so innocently) asks "Honey, is the internet down? I can't get to CNN.com" because I know I have a crapload of work to do this morning and don't have time to futz with it.

      Now suppose *everything* in my house had the same level of complexity. <shudder>

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    4. Re:Home Automation is Hard by UnknownQ · · Score: 1
      Most people aren't "fiddlers" by nature, and it's only those of us who *enjoy* messing with crap like that who are willing to do it.

      But that wasn't my point, my point is that the homeowners of tommorow will have grown up with the BSOD, so their house crashing wouldn't phase them and definately pressing a couple of buttons to get recipes wouldn't be bad. Of course this house would have to be scalable in complexity, for example: the microwave should work even if you don't scan the barcodes.
      --
      Wherever you go, there you are!
    5. Re:Home Automation is Hard by geekoid · · Score: 0

      De-Sign, not de-bug.

      Mased on what you have said, I would say you need to learn how to design.

      "Software is going to have to get orders of magnitude better before it's even thinkable.
      "
      software is fine, is how people use it. The fact that you and your Nerd significant other can't design software doesn't mean it can't be done.

      And yes, I have designed a complete automation system. Not for a house, but for a warehouse that is significantly more complex in the way it is used then a house.

      I hearby revoke you, and your girlfriends, nerd status. you are now demoted to 'Geek'. because you talk the talk, but you can't walk the walk.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Home Automation is Hard by swillden · · Score: 1

      my point is that the homeowners of tommorow will have grown up with the BSOD, so their house crashing wouldn't phase them

      That would depend entirely on how much time the crashing house cost them. And it doesn't even have to *crash* to be a problem; arguably, the cases where it does the wrong things are even worse.

      I'm not saying it will never work, I'm just agreeing with the original poster that it must work very, very well, and much better than has been achieved, before anyone other that those who love technology for its own sake will want it. People are willing to put up with the BSOD because the computer is still a net benefit. It's pretty easy to see how home automation could cost you huge amounts of time and effort, and it's not really clear that there is that much benefit to be had.

      For example, I have programmable thermostats which, for the first few years, I carefully programmed so that they adjusted the temperatures to fit my family's schedule. After a while, I decided it's too much effort. It's easier just to turn them up and down manually -- particularly since we always had to adjust them manually anyway.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    7. Re:Home Automation is Hard by Thomas+Wendell · · Score: 1

      My purpose in listing the minor problem with our initial home automation program was not to characterize my programming or design skills, but rather to point out that even a seemingly simple rule custom written for a specific home and its occupants with their patterns of use can work perfectly for months and yet have unexpected effects when conditions change.

      This was a single simple rule that was trivial to understand and fix. However, in a mass-produced system with much more complex rules which are not fully understood by the users, home automation will introduce undesired behavior that will be very frustrating for those users.

    8. Re:Home Automation is Hard by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      De-Sign, not de-bug.
      Rubbish.
      For example. Walk into the next room. Plan each and every step including all shifts of weight to keep your balance. Now follow *exactly* that plan.
      Doesn't work. What does work is to do something, find the consequences and compensate. Parent is quite right in that there are strong limits to what can be done automatically.
      Design works for reinventing wheels. The wheel doesn't start nice and round. The wheel starts rather lumpish with various strange protrubances. Only by reinventing does the "wheelness" emerge.

  89. Re:Islam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a Muslim, but you're a stupid troll. People have been saying the death of 7 astronaughts is a sign from Allah, but yet our beloved Prophet(Peace be upon him) stood up in honour for a Jew that passed away.

    Abu Hamza -- how did you know that the ship which blowed up is Allah's Wrath? You talk about it being 'devine punishment'....how do you know? Did you receive a relevation from Allah about such matter? Some info to ponder:

    - 7 people died
    - As a Muslim, when Allah decrees a person's life has come to an end, they die at the time and place He has written.
    - Our prophet afaik did not rejoice on the death of the innocent, weak, young, old, etc. When the oppresors were fighting against him, little did he curse them.

    Don't become desparate looking for rejoice, when it is our hands that are to blame. What is happening to us Muslims isn't because of US or ruthless kings, but what we have earned.

  90. Finally by xnixman · · Score: 1

    Rover from Microsoft Bob has a new home!

    Really though...I don't care if it IS Microsoft that is doing it, it is NICE to see someone doing it.

    Smarthouse technology is cool. I don't mean X10 controls on your basement light, I mean real smarthouse stuff.

    Dan

  91. Doh! by bigmattana · · Score: 1
    The TV also has a message about grandma. According to the television, she is having a "normal day."

    Just what I need, Microsoft keeping track of my grandma! Well, if they couldn't get Windows into her house, maybe they can get me to put some Microsoft technology in her house for her...

    Honey, have you downloaded the latest service pack for our house yet?

  92. Parental *Units*? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    But the bad news for teens is that their computer use might be greatly limited by their parental units.
    Can someone please tell me where the phrase 'parental unit' came from? I mean, is the word 'parents' deprecated now, just like 'handicapped' and 'black'?

    1. Re:Parental *Units*? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frank Zappa. That's why he called his kid Moon Unit. He was quite the joker.

  93. Speech recognition a challenge? by digitalcowboy · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    But that's to be expected. Speech recognition is one of the technology challenges currently facing software developers. If the system worked right now they'd move it to Microsoft's house of today, a nearby showroom officially known as the Consumer Experience Center where the company shows off current technology.

    Perhaps if the system worked right now, they'd call it Macintosh OS X.

    Seriously, Mac speech recognition has (quietly) gotten pretty good, just recently. For nearly ten years it's been one of those things that I play with occasionally and think, "When they get this right, it's gonna be cool."

    It's now very cool. With an hour or so of set up, a few nights ago, I can now surf the web (among many other tasks) completely hands free. I say, "Drudge" and Safari opens drudgereport.com. I say, "move page down" and it scrolls. I say, "Weather" and weather.com is loaded. I say, "Switch to..." and it switches to whatever app I want, already running or not.

    All while iTunes is playing.

    Any keyboard shortcut can be defined in one app or system-wide to be triggered by any spoken word or phrase you choose.

    Combine it with Applescript and.... shell scripts and... this is VERY cool.

    Mac users, if you haven't tried Speech stuff on your Mac recently, try it again with 10.2.

    I recently demonstrated it to a neighbor who only knows Windows and his response was, "So how much would it cost me to get a Mac that can do that?"

    Microsoft, once again, is WAY behind the curve.

    1. Re:Speech recognition a challenge? by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      You're right, that sort of speech recognition is not hard, but it's not that impressive either. It's just fuzzy matching of recorded sounds. Stuff like realtime dictation with few mistakes is still pretty tough.

      Personally I don't see the benefits of the setup you have. My wife would put up with it for about 5 minutes I reckon.

  94. Clippy by lateralus_1024 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought Microsoft's animated *assistant* appears after you drop a hot load on the sofa.

    "It appears that you have moved your bowels in a most inappropriate way. Would you like to add the turd to the clipboard for later use?"

    --
    If you think /. comments are bad, check out Digg.
  95. It *did* have a bathroom. by fireboy1919 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The visitors just didn't know how to use the three seashells. :)

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    1. Re:It *did* have a bathroom. by dominick · · Score: 1

      Those who did not get this joke, don't watch enough TV. This quote was from "Demolition Man" starring Wesley Snipes and Sylvestor Stalone!

    2. Re:It *did* have a bathroom. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Those who did not get this joke, don't watch enough TV. This quote was from "Demolition Man" starring Wesley Snipes and Sylvestor Stalone!

      No. "Demolition Man", starring Sandra Bullock. Snipes and Stallone do appear somewhere, I think.

  96. Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these :) by sryx · · Score: 1

    Talk about Network Neighborhood!
    -Jason

  97. Bathrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought that this is a site that contains news for nerds. What news is bathroomless aparment for a nerd? At least they don't seem to think that a shower is a kind of stuff that matters.

  98. Funnier than the line about no toilets... by surprise_audit · · Score: 2, Informative
    Did nobody else see this paragraph?

    If their friends are online, they can join in to their "music session" and listen to whatever tune is playing at their house. (The Recording Industry of America, a music industry trade group that got their knickers in a knot over file swapping software such as Napster, is going to love that feature.)

    I swear, I laughed out loud!

    1. Re:Funnier than the line about no toilets... by Skiboo · · Score: 1

      If their friends are online, they can join in to their "music session" and listen to whatever tune is playing at their house.

      I wouldn't worry too much - it will probably automatically bill you or your friends for royalties while it's at it.

  99. E-mail... by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 1
    The last thing you want is to be inundated with e-mail while you're trying to take off your shoes.

    My thoughts exactly! After all, who wouldn't want to download all of their Outlook viruses and Hotmail spam as they sit in the La-Z-Boy, listening to Bob Marley amid the pulsating red-and-green walls?

  100. Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to Hal ladies.

  101. 50 licenses by asb · · Score: 1

    50 computers require 50 Windows licenses. Smart move.

    But when will Sun do the same with their technology?

    --
    Antti S. Brax - Old school - http://www.iki.fi/asb/
  102. Ewwwwh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Makes me want to build a log cabin far far far away from the Microsoft Home.

    Seems more like being enslaved to automation! Whatever happened to unplugging! I like to come home, pour a scotch and read a good book next to the fireplace in a comfy chair.

    Reminds me of the "Minority Report" concept of targeted advertising that I found most distasteful. Walking along and ads greet you and worse follow you around trying to sell you stuff you don't need. Don't like telemarketing as it stands? Try that on for size. Freaky!

    Hmmm one little virus and all the junk in your house ceases to function. Could be quite lucrative for a thief to just infect your house then waltz right in and take all your stuff. Or how about a virus that kills people or just drives you batty! Howabout putting something like goatse.cx on all the displays including the fridge magnets! Nice treat for an elementary schoolaged child.

    I don't know about you, but computers and technology are nothing but tools. But I am not liking the direction these dreamers are dreaming.

    Cell phones and pagers are intrusive enough. I've managed to not be tied down with one except for at work. I turn the damned thing off when I am not on duty. I just don't get it when people just use a cell phone everywhere. I honestly have zero reason for anyone to contact me at all times. Nor do I need to chat needlessly all the time. Sure it could come in handy in an emergency, but it's not really necessary. Alexander Grahm Bell cursed the telephone after inventing it and it spread everywhere. More than once he wished he'd never invented the damn thing.

    I don't see much of this technology really making it. Just like those Popular Mechanics reels never really came to pass. i.e. home of the future full of gadgets. Of course good ideas will prevail and some things will be nice but I certainly don't want my home flooded with technology.

    I like Apple computers because Mac OS X works well with the tightly controlled hardware. It doesn't get in my way and I have never been so productive nor so happy since the computer enthusiast days. (pre-Microsoft/PC-Clone). I've spent years building PC's, using all sorts of operating systems. I've not been so happy using a Mac except for when I used an Atari ST running GEM/TOS. I'd clearly forgotten how computing was supposed to be. I am amazed by the amount of time I save because I am not constantly tweaking and fixing things. It also runs 99.9% of the Unix/Linux software I need and want to run.

    Next thing you know, MS will build a car that drives itself. I sure as shit would not buy one nor would I want to drive on the same road as some schmuck who does. Doesn't the BMW 745i come with WinCE that's buggy as hell? Things like the trunk popping open and closed by itself, computer freezes, etc. Pretty damn hard to reboot your beamer.

    Quick Jimmy, run down stairs and press CTRL+ALT+DEL to kill the vacumm task before it kills the cat!

    I've spent the last several months studying Objective-C and the Cocoa API's. Project Builder and Interface Builder combined with the fantastic Cocoa libraries (formerly NeXTStep/OpenStep) are absolutely amazing. Considering when these technologies were first presented, they were so far ahead of their time that few understood the concepts. Much more efficient than using VB or Java to build applications.

    If anyone builds the home of the future that will actually be used and relied upon, it will be Apple technology powering it. It will be unobtrusive and it will simply work in such a way that you will barely know it's there.

    Linux is great. GNU is fantastic. They will eventually get there or at the least contribute heavily to the future.

  103. Re:Let's put this together with MS's rep for secur by PissingInTheWind · · Score: 1

    I guess the house would come with some sort of default code to enter it, and 50% of people wouldn't change it out of lazyness.

    --

    A message from the system administrator: 'I've upped my priority. Now up yours.'
  104. That's Great by omega9 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Microsoft does not need^H^H^H^Hdeserve this much control.

    It's bad enough the world has to deal with things like the SQL Slammer, but there's no way in hell I'm going to risk waking up one morning to the Toaster Twister and Coffee Cruncher, visit the bathroom to great the Rectal Reamer, and find out my mailbox says STOP ERROR 0x00000e24 - INACCESSABLE BOOT DEVICE.

    Only to be topped off by being yelled at by some /. troll becuase "Hotfix Q1873672 has been out for your microwave for 3 months!!1 It's your own fault you can't walk upright anymore!!". Hmm.. must be time to patch the house again.

    NO SIR.

    --
    I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it.
    1. Re:That's Great by scotay · · Score: 1

      Voice of Pierce Brosnan: Relax Omega 9. That reamer is a feature not a bug. Its part of Microsoft's Active Crapper technology that will analyze your "leavings" to plan enjoyably nutritious meals.

      Relax, Omega 9. I'm detecting unusually high levels of tension in your backfat. Have a comfy seat in couch.Net.

      ***Detecting an unauthorized access by an unlicensed ass***

      Remember, Omega 9, one Client Access License is required for each set of butt cheeks that will access the couch. You have 29 days left to evaluate couch.Net.

  105. drag and drop, on the forefront of New Technology! by kraksmoka · · Score: 1
    tools that enable graphical data to be dragged and dropped from one chart to another; tools that Microsoft believes might be available in the future.

    wow, so it IS true. Mac is going x86 to kick the shit out of winblows.

    lemme see here. i've been dragging and dropping for how long on mac os???

    m$ jokers.

    --
    "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." - Rahm Emanuel
  106. A Disturbing Vision of the future of computing by sanermind · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...in which the current dumb-user-centric model has ascended to the point that it begins to conquer volition and personal descision making. The computer tells you what ingrediants to pick in the kitchen, it worrys about how many guests you have, and then tells you a recipie apropos to them... perhaps, soon enough, an earpiece will tell you what to say to them...

    This level of automation is only apropriate to the mentally handicapped or infirm! Computers are wonderfull things, if you want to understand them and tell them to solve a problem... but if ms's ideal vision of the future is a world in which you are incapable of deciding on your own what to do, a world of insurgent 'user friendliness' to the point that the computers are directing our behavior [in a socially usefull and constructive way, no doubt] instead of using them as tools... it's ugly, and it's the ultimate fulfillment of user-friendliness. I just can't wait for the 'so I'm a women now' birds and the bees wizards to instruct parents and children on that special path of adolescance [only $99.95 for this special upgrade pack!]
    Scary.

    --

    ---
    the pen is mightier than the sword, the sword is mightier than the court, the court is mightier than the pen.
    1. Re:A Disturbing Vision of the future of computing by rakkasan · · Score: 1

      bah, bah, we are, after nothing but sheep..;)

      --
      The problem is choice..
    2. Re:A Disturbing Vision of the future of computing by kputnam · · Score: 1

      Yes, exactly. An automated home of this magnatude is just stupid and would people into dumb pigeons with credit cards (more than they already are). Besides the fact this whole thing would cause extreme inconveinance when things went wrong - bugs (I'm sure MS will have most of them ironed out before the products hit any shelfs, wink wink), power outages, security problems, and constant meddling to make it work the way you want (like Windows). Having a computer make such basic decisions for humans would leave many feeling controlled, and if not... its disgustingly lazy to have a computer do everything for you. I am sick of consumerism in America, this would just make it exponentially worse. Fast food eating fuel wasting SUV driving cell phone talking mindless slaves of the economy!

  107. bluetooth by GiMP · · Score: 1

    One thing they mentioned is that the microwave could tell how long to cook the food by a barcode. Personally, I would like to see all products coming bluetooth (or similiar) enabled. Your refrigerator could automatically keep tabs on the contents, microwaves and ovens would automatically determine the heat/length of cooking.

    When you want to go shopping, your house could spit out a list of things that you will need to pickup based on the amount in stock and your typical purchasing habits.

  108. Quantities adjusted by the number of people inside by cOdEgUru · · Score: 4, Funny

    Scenario One:

    Heath : Computer, why did you select the quantity for four. Its just me in here..

    Computer : Sweetheart, I thought I should cook for the three gentlemen hiding in the attic with guns too..

    Scenario Two:

    Heath : Please select quantity as two for myself and my boyfriend.

    Computer : Your boyfriend was here with the blonde from the coffeeshop. Believe me sweetie, he ate.. Oh how he ate!!

  109. Re:drag and drop, on the forefront of New Technolo by La+Temperanza · · Score: 1

    OpenDoc is still around? (I actually read that paragraph, you see.)

    --

    --
    est modus in rebus
  110. I'm curious... by La+Temperanza · · Score: 1

    If this home was exactly the same, but developed by a university and running Linux, how many of the complainers do you think would suddenly change their tune? :)

    --

    --
    est modus in rebus
  111. tech of the future by t_parker16 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    methinks the computerized home of the future is more about technology "fading into the background", making things more convenient but in an unobtrusive way; not the technology being the centerpiece of a "gee whiz" kind of house that would appeal most to a 14-year-old.

    but maybe its just the dissonance between a "showcase house of the future", where tech is the centerpiece, and the tech we all really will want and/or need.

  112. Adresses in digital format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What could that mean to have all adresses (and probably not only those on front doors) displayed on LCD-like panels, given that you have a wireless information network everywhere?
    It means that your small bakery around the corner can do the same with your street adress, what AOL and other big companies has been doing for quite a while with sport-stadiums: Bying the names.
    Today you live in the Jefferson St, next week it'll be renamed to Miller's Bakery St and so on. While everyone has access to the city data and vice versa, your organizer simply tells you the way to get to your friend, not the street name where he lives.

  113. Which means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1)I would be locked out of my M$ home thrice a day.
    2)I must contact M$ and give my Credit Card#,Social Security and a 3000 digit code issued by the Federal Authentication Department of M$ proving that I am myself.
    3)Twice a week, burglars will break into my house - and M$ would blame me back since I did not cough up money for their new ultra powerful lock.

  114. Pa' que, pa' cagarla by HHMMSS · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    pues eso

  115. The world of the future - System with no escape? by root+66 · · Score: 1

    The complete integration of technology into our daily lives seems helpful and nice at first sight. But reconsidering makes me wonder if it's that good at all.

    To me the MS like future makes us just more part of a system, of a big machine (Günther Anders' "Weltmaschine") - more time efficiency, smooth and flawless interaction of the human cogwheels.

    Where's the freedom of the individual? Where are the 15 minutes you need to recognize your existence?

    I wonder whether the growth of the world machine is ever gonna stop. If we are not careful the networked society of today and tomorrow is the beginning of the end of individuality.

    --
    -- I love the smell of Blue Screens in the morning.
  116. Arthur Dent and the Nutrimat Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Is anyone else reminded of the scene in Hitchiker's Guide in which Arthur is trying to get a cup of tea from the Nutrimat?

    Arthur: Why is the air being filled with cheap perfume?

    Ventilation system: But you like scented air. It's fresh and invigorating!

    Arthur: Damn! Why is the floor moving?

    Floor: Massage away your tension...

    Arthur: TURN THE SOOTHING MUSIC OFF!!!!

  117. it... by m1chael · · Score: 1, Funny

    may not have a bathroom but does it have a backdoor?

    --
    I know you are psychotic, but please make an effort.
  118. Has anyone considered the cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you know how expensive all this stuff would be? And do you really think micro$oft would let you off the hook after the initial purchase? My guess is that a "basic" setup would run well into five figures. For that kind of money, you could drop a really nice pool into the back yard and one of those really expensive (but nice) stainless barbeques. I know what I'd rather have.

  119. Re:Biometrics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FYI amputation will not work on most decent biometric systems. For example, any quality hand scanner will scan not only fingerprint patterns, but will take pulse and temperature readings to ensure that what they are scanning is actually a living person.

  120. Already like this in Japan by bfinuc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In Japan all the new houses have toilet bowls operated by remote control. You can adjust the seat heating and fine tune the flush and there are nozzles that squirt your butt for fun and hygiene. They are about as standardized and easy to use as VCR remotes and the instructions are in Japanese, providing a powerful incentive to learn the language. Seems like the perfect niche for Windows WC or whatever.

    --
    I bragged about my Karma at a job interview but I didn't get the job.
    1. Re:Already like this in Japan by generic-man · · Score: 1

      All of the fancy-schmancy toilets also have regular old flush levers. Nice for backward compatibility.

      When I was in Japan last summer, I made it a point never to play with those buttons or dials. There's no "toy" in "toilet."

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:Already like this in Japan by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      With a Windows WC, exactly what happens during a General Protection Fault?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Already like this in Japan by Gimpin · · Score: 1

      Nice, just what I want to hold and remote that other people had in their hands while they are taking a dump...can you say fecal matters

      --
      "Simon Says, Fuck You" - George Carlin
    4. Re:Already like this in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With a Windows WC, exactly what happens during a General Protection Fault?

      It asks you if you want to send the data dump to Microsoft for analysis.

    5. Re:Already like this in Japan by jimstone · · Score: 1
      When I was in Japan last summer, I made it a point never to play with those buttons or dials. There's no "toy" in "toilet."

      As long as they don't get tacky and include a video-phone in the hi-tech loo of the future!

  121. It's a company vision of the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What they show is not how our houses (if we still decide to live in houses by 2010) will be, or how we'll want them to be. They only show how far they want to go to keep record of our life and sell us useless stuff.

  122. Say what? by FS1 · · Score: 1

    Can I preorder one? Would I want too? The answer to both of these questions is a resounding but not surprising "NO".

    --
    A Fatal OE Exception has occurred, Sig will now reboot.
  123. Douglas Adams predicted this... by Doobian+Coedifier · · Score: 2, Funny

    MARVIN: "It is..."
    ARTHUR: "What?"
    MARVIN: "Ghastly. The noise. Absoulutely ghastly. Just don't even talk about it. Look at this door. All the doors in this spacecraft have a cheerful and sunny disposition. It is their pleasure to open for you, and their satisfaction to close again with the knowledge of a job well done."
    DOOR: "Hummmmmmmmmmmmmmm"
    MARVIN: Hateful, isn't it? Come on, I've been ordered to take you up to the bridge. Here I am, brain the size of a planet, and they tell me to take you up to the bridge. Call that job satisfaction? Cause I don't."
    FORD: "Excuse me, which government owns this ship?"
    MARVIN: "You watch this door. It's about to open again. I can tell by the intolerable air of smugness it suddenly generates. Come on."
    DOOR: "Hummmmmmmmmmmm....glad to be of service."
    MARVIN: "Thank you the marketing division of the Syrius Cybernetics Corporation."
    DOOR: "Hummmmmmmmmmmm....you're welcome."



    With the greatest respect and admiration for Douglas Adams. RIP.
    1. Re:Douglas Adams predicted this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck Douglas Adams. Fuck his rotting corpse.

  124. Am I the only one? by Drakonite · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So.. Am I the only one that realized if I had spare cash laying around I could already implement everything in that "house of tommorow"?

    --
    Shoot Pixels, Not People!
    1. Re:Am I the only one? by neuroticia · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not necessarily. Certain elements of the "House of Tomorrow" are prototypes, or currently-working technologies that are merely faking the "futuristic" technologies that MS hopes are to come. Like the barcoder-scanner-microwave. Yeah you could do it, but you'd have to manually program in each barcode and tell the microwave how long it would take to cook--I think that MS's vision is that the microwaves or cans would come with that information and remove the manual element. Granted, if you had the cash you could hire a thousand monkeys to catalog your favorite canned delights. Although, I should hope that if you had that type of money you'd opt for a great cook instead.

      Certainly you could duplicate everything that MS did, and even take it further--but the primary purpose of the "House of Tomorrow" isn't to demonstrate technology so much as it is to hint at what's to come. Like the article said--not everything is working perfectly just yet, and all of it would be more trouble to implement than it would be worth. I think the point of the whole thing is that the technology is becoming easier to deploy, things are becoming more automated and accepted in common culture, and people are becoming more accepting of technology in the household and less paranoid about the possibilities of having so much intelligent machinery around. Prices are also dropping, which means that these technologies are within the grasp of those with a few paltry millions, making the major stumbling block the IMPLEMENTATION and CHOREOGRAPHY between the parts, and not the cost, or even (ultimately) the basic technologies behind it all.

      -Sara

  125. no way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd rather stay in Iraq then let MS invade my home.

  126. There will be a bathroom... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When they release MS House 2, but being MS they won't perfect it until version 3.1 or until they release Service Pack 6a.

  127. I wonder... by FS1 · · Score: 1

    I hope there will be a modchip available, so i can make my home more compatible with my personal preferences. Cause the last thing i want is that gay clippy thing in my face at 6am telling me to get out of bed cause i am going to be late for work. I don't want a computer to script my life, especially one with Micro$oft inside.

    --
    A Fatal OE Exception has occurred, Sig will now reboot.
  128. in the future, we don't need toilets by g4dget · · Score: 1

    Or didn't you notice how the Enterprise and its shuttles on Star Trek don't seem to have any toilets either? Maybe it works like the food replicators in reverse, or maybe everybody just wears Depends.

  129. The house of the future has no bathroom by IHateEverybody · · Score: 1

    This is a deal breaker. I want a DSL line or a wireless access point in the bathroom. I want no part of a future where the throne room has no Internet access.

    --
    Does this .sig make my butt look big?
  130. Re:Let's put this together with MS's rep for secur by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

    password: open

    oh dear :-[

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  131. No toilet? by Orlando · · Score: 1

    Ironic since that's where their software should be....badda bing!

    --
    -= This is a self-referential sig =-
  132. retrograde by magarity · · Score: 1

    This is more like the house of the past rather than the future. Everyone in the TV generation knows the houses in the 50s didn't have bathrooms either. Looks like MS is taking a giant leap backward. What's next, fins on the Microsoft Car???

  133. MSHome - because you're too dumb to be outside by laughing_badger · · Score: 1
    homework lock-down, which parents can use to disable TV, music and other home entertainment until the schoolwork is done.

    Seriously, if this feature is actually needed in a household, you have bigger problems than your TV not knowing who you are.

    Why is it that taking responsibility for your actions is seen as a bad thing these days? What is wrong with asking your kids to get their homework done, and explaining to them why it is a good idea to do it?

    Brock

    --
    Help children born unable to swallow - www.tofs.org.uk
  134. Obligatory Dennis Pennis Quote by The+Grassy+Knoll · · Score: 1

    Surely an MS house should have more than the average number of bathrooms, a la Dennis Pennis?

    DP (doorstepping Michael Winner outside awards ceremony): Michael, is it true your new house has five bathrooms?

    MW: Yes

    DP: Is that because you put out so much shit?

    Exit MW, confused

    --
    They will never know the simple pleasure of a monkey knife fight
  135. It's Microsoft house ! by Leeto2 · · Score: 1


    Where nothing can go wrong...
    go wrong.
    go wrong.
    go wrong.

    --



    "That's no moon"... Obi-Wan Kenobi
  136. Typical Microsoft single user PC by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Retinal scan at the front door tells the house who is in, now you get email, messages, soup cooked the way you like, lighting set up the way you like ...

    Who's to say you didn't come home with spouse and kids, guests, neighbors, or who knows who? What does it do if the spouse or kids or guests arrive after you, separately? Now whose settings does it use?

    Seems that Microsoft hasn't shed their single user single tasking legacy.

    Besides that nonsense, the idea that you would always want your soup heated the same amount is terrible. Recipes based on ingredients you put on a counter; pardon me, I think I'd pick the recipe first, then shop for the ingredients I don't have.

    Everything described here seems so primitive and so Microsoft. The map shows where the kids are supposed to be. That is not useful, it gives all the appearance of safety and none of the reality.

    The idea that Microsoft security could enforce a homework lockdown by the parents on the kids, ha! Parents would let the computer read to the kids in their place, a real miss the point instance, like everything else.

    The work situation; a competitor has invented a better widget. What is our response? Announce our own better widgit which doesn't exist yet! Where have we heard that before? They come up with nonsense of scanning all the suppliers etc, see if the production can be sped up, as if our company was running at slow speed to start with.

    This house is unimaginative and nonsensical. If this is the best they can come up with, they haven't got much research for the buck.

  137. The best "home of tommorow" by grumling · · Score: 1
    http://home.cfl.rr.com/omniluxe/sm.htm

    The RCA home of tomorrow at the end of Space Mountain was, by far, the best HOT ever.

    --
    "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
  138. better flush twice ... by Wansu · · Score: 1


    It's a long way to Redmond.

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor
  139. No bathroom?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I guess you'll just have to go in the Recycle Bin.

  140. disabling entertaining for kids by botik32 · · Score: 1
    ---
    broad-based features such as homework lock-down, which parents can use to disable TV, music and other home entertainment until the schoolwork is done.

    Imagine this:
    Day 1.
    [bespectacled kid muttering under his breath reading bugtraq] I wonder whether my parents have installed patch 1436-B?

    one hour later

    [bespectacled kid muttering under his breath while logging in to the master computer] Gosh! they put our cat's name as root password?

    one week later...
    [stocky kid during lunch to bespectacled kid] hey how about hacking into our house, and I promise not to beat you again?

  141. A Vision... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once the open source revolution has finally strangled Microsoft and Linus Torvalds has statues of himself put on every street corner:

    Son: Daddy, whats windows?
    Dad: It's those things on the wall dumbass.

    =)

  142. no way... by technomom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    >>Back in the future, Heath is showing us around the teen bedroom of the future.... The teen, Heath says, will have the biggest and best computer monitor in the house.

    Well, not in MY house! Not unless "the teen" gets off his or her ass and gets a job to pay for it!

    1. Re:no way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet the 'teen' is fucking hot though!

  143. Is this really Microsoft's vision of the future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...or is this "Help! The coatrack won't let go of my head!!!"

  144. The Machine Stops by Roger_Wilco · · Score: 1

    This reminds me most strongly of a short story called The Machine Stops. Written in 1909, it anticipates display screens, robotic doctors, video conferencing, etc. You might find it interesting.

  145. Not so Promising by KalenDarrie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Chuckles aside, I don't really feel comfortable with the idea of an automated house. Concerns about Microsoft and having their software running my home aside(I would never buy a Microsoft house), the prospect of having thigns adjusted when someone enters is potentially annoying. What if lights turn on or off or adjust level of illumination while you're doing something. What if someone prefers to have metal blasting when they come in and you happen to be next to the speakers when they open the door.

    Sure, small problems but there is more. One of the common themes in science fiction is the one where human technology has risen in scope and scale, reducing the need of people to work or move. It should be obvious, by comparing the different strata of technology across the world, that the ease created by technology creates a general laziness within a population. As nice as conveniences could be, I can only see many of them creating more sloth and laziness amongst the population.

    Not to mention the prospect of a wired, net active house being co-opted by hackers. Don't be so naive as to think that security would be so seriously improved as to make hacking impossible. Technology increases on all fronts. I wouldn't relish the prospect of hackers gaining control of environmental functions and other parts of a wired in house. Imagine the water periodically going frosty as you shower. Chilling thought, eh?

    I will admit that some things, such as biometric access and a little digital notepad on the door are interesting and much more useful than harmful. But everything has a point of excess, where too much of a good thing sours it. We should be careful about having too much tech.

    --
    Kalen D'arrie
  146. Re:That's Great ...what about AHRI at Georgia Tech by catch23 · · Score: 1

    Yeah I know you're trying to be funny and it's always easy to crack on Microsoft. But then there are actually other people doing the same kind of work. I remember doing a few small projects for this home. They have small video cameras on the ceilings of all the walls pointed straight down to track every single person's movement.

    Checkout Georgia Tech's <a href="http://www.cc.gatech.edu/fce/ahri/">Aware Home Project</a>.

    Fortunately, their home has a bathroom in it. :-)

  147. Re:That's Great ...what about AHRI at Georgia Tech by catch23 · · Score: 1

    Stupid me posts as code... this is the LINKY

  148. Unfortunate International Misunderstanding by CharlieO · · Score: 1

    Interesting article, but a phrase used made me stop and look again.

    I'm in the UK, and here the slang 'boob' is used to refer to a womans chest. I understand that in the US 'boob' is used to refer to someone of limited intellect.

    Now the phrase 'boob tube' in the US clearly means TV for the intellectually challenged.

    Unfortunately in the UK 'boob tube' means a particularly tasteless item of 80's fashion that was basically just a wide elasticated belt style top for women. Try putting 'boob tube 80' in google...

    Kinda makes that paragraph scan slightly differently

  149. Steve Jobs Is My Cousin by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is behind the curve? Well, yes - Microsoft doesn't have this type of functionality built in. Although, when you've got Windows running on your IBM-clone, you can be pleased to know that software for it is actually produced. No one writes software for the Mac except Apple. So basically, if Apple doesn't provide something - you're screwed. On the other hand, if Microsoft doesn't provide something, there are plenty of other software companies developing for Windows variants so, chances are, it will come along. And of course there are speech recognition programs that a Windows user can use and do the same thing you are doing. Although personally, I don't want to have to talk the whole time I am at my computer.

    --
    I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
  150. Sirius Cybernetics comes to mind... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

    A figment of Douglas Adams imagination. A company so large and makes so many shoddy products that the only division making a profit is the complaint department that now spans 3 planets...

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  151. Just be glad it's a Windows toilet by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 2, Funny

    If the thing went bad do you really want to be looking through Unix Core dumps from it to debug it? :-}

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
  152. Where do you want to Go? by goombah99 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Well the lack of a toilet fits perfectly with microsofts slogan.

    Where do you want to go today?

    Not here at home that's for sure.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Where do you want to Go? by nytes · · Score: 1

      Well, you know the old saying... Garbage In, Garbage Out.

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
  153. In Microsoft House... by Farce+Pest · · Score: 2, Funny

    In Microsoft House, toilet uses YOU.

    --
    This message has been scanned for memes and dangerous content by MindScanner, and is believed to be unclean.
  154. If the toilet crashes ... by Bowfinger · · Score: 2, Funny

    If the toilet crashes, does the shit hit the fan? Literally? How can you tell a BBOD (Blue Bowl of Death) from regular Tidy Bowl? Finally, a home for Microsoft's crappy software. Way too many one-liners with this story.

  155. The problem with GPL House... by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The first problem is that you wouldn't be able to close the door. Anyone could walk in and build on a new addition (though they'd have to post the floorplans for it outside so all can see).

    Actually, Gentoo house is a forest. Compile the lumber yourself.

    I wonder how far into the absurd we can descend with this thread.

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
    1. Re:The problem with GPL House... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could be worse. If you had an xBSD house, you'd come home to find that it had forked all over the lot.

    2. Re:The problem with GPL House... by plugger · · Score: 1

      The first problem is that you wouldn't be able to close the door. Anyone could walk in and build on a new addition (though they'd have to post the floorplans for it outside so all can see).

      That's what the people at Microsoft House would have you think. The truth is, you could close and lock the door, and you don't have to give the floorplans to anyone unless they obtained a house from you.

      If you ever passed the house on to someone else, then you would have to pass on the plans as well. The new owners would have the right to extend/demolish it and also use it as a business premises/nightclub/anything else, should they so desire.

    3. Re:The problem with GPL House... by diablobynight · · Score: 1

      Here's a thought, there won't be a linux house. you idiots. Who is going to pay to design it. Linux is free and you can't pay a carpenter with chips and beer like most linux programmers are paid with. Leave your house, get a job, get a girlfriend, sell your volvo and get a life, then you won't need to sit around programming your own OS.

      --
      Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
    4. Re:The problem with GPL House... by neuroticia · · Score: 1

      Err. Actually, you'll be able to close the door and lock it with your preference of locks, and the locks will work. With the MS-House you can lock it up with what looks to be an industrial-strength lock, but then someone can always climb in through the mailbox. =]

      The only way to have a secure MS-house is if you situate it inside of a BSD or Linux-moat/outer castle wall.

      -Sara

    5. Re:The problem with GPL House... by neuroticia · · Score: 1

      Wow, I just looked at your history of posting, and I don't think I've ever seen that many "I hate this OS" posts in my life.

      Do you really think that the whole idea of OSS would even SOUND like something that would work? Yet Linux and BSD and all the OSS products that are out on the market ARE working, ARE being developed, and in a lot of situations are much better than their commercial counterparts. (Think Apple, Microsoft, Sun)

      While a "Linux house" is much more involved, since there needs lumber and other materials, manual labor, etc. It's not entirely un-realistic. You'd still have to purchase your lumber and building supplies--but who said geeks are opposed to spending money? We're perfectly willing to purchase the hardware that runs our OS. As for blueprints, that would be the "Open" part, and remember... The whole idea of having to buy a pre-built house or have one built for you by contractors is actually a fairly recent idea. Look back to the 1800s/1900s and there were barn raisings, house building parties, etc. That's the community.

      I'd love to know the history of the bee you seem to have up your butt about Linux/OSS.

      -Sara

    6. Re:The problem with GPL House... by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Hmmmmmm...

      You should go on vacation or something. You are obviously too stressed out to functionin society.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    7. Re:The problem with GPL House... by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      OSS is really incredible when you think about it. It's a worldwide volunteer effort which has accomplished so much it's just amazing. Even if you have qualms about the Linux OS, it's very hard to imagine that every part of the platform was created for the good of the people.

      On the other hand, that's why I don't consider linux to be competition for Windows in the purest sense -- to say Linux is competition for Windows is like saying an orphanage is competiton for a daycare center, or a soup kitchen for the homeless competition for a supermarket. The thought that MS used that at their trial leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    8. Re:The problem with GPL House... by neuroticia · · Score: 1

      Hm. Linux != soup kitchen/orphanage. Linux IS competition for Windows. Imagine it this way--if an orphanage and soup kitchen existed that rivaled the cusine and care available at the commercial institutions, was free, and was available to any level of income including the rich... Wouldn't life be harder for the commercial supermarkets and daycare?

      Linux suits me with distros like Debian and Slackware, however it's also started to suit people like my grandmother--whose computer is old and cannot run Windows very well. Throw XFCE on it, and she's got a very live-able GUI that doesn't confuse her. My mom has more modern hardware but can't afford WinXPPro, and WinXPHome sucks monkey butt, Redhat Linux 8.0 works wonders on her computer, and reduces the support trips I need to make home to recover the document she accidentally put in the system folder and can't get out for fear of damaging the system. (Yes, Linux CAN be great for the computer illiterate)

      -Sara

  156. I want windows in my home! by danimrich · · Score: 1


    Can you imagine a home without windows?

    --
    where's all that Karma?
  157. No Bathroom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably just as well:

    This elimination has caused an Invalid Page Fault at:

    (hex dump follows)

    Please reboot MS House to flush the toilet. (Then all the annoying MS defaults you tried your best to eliminate from MS House come back on).

    Or my personal favourite....when the house keeps coming up BSOD, and you freeze to death in a modern city.

  158. Hilarious but for one thing: by Damek · · Score: 1

    ...you really shouldn't store bananas in a refridgerator. They belong out on the counter. Keeping them cold just ruins them...

    1. Re:Hilarious but for one thing: by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 1

      Except for keeping them in the crisper with unripend fruits... ie an unripe avacodo

  159. lawyer joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hold on. I have to reboot my lawyer...

  160. There's a reason. by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do you really want Steve Ballmer hunched over a monitor somewhere and sweating while watching you lather up in the shower?

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  161. uh huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Troll. I sure couldn't count on Adobe, Macromedia, IBM, or Microsoft to write some Mac software, huh.

  162. No one writes software for the mac... by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
    No one writes software for the Mac except Apple. So basically, if Apple doesn't provide something - you're screwed

    You're so right. No one writes software for the Mac.

    -T

    1. Re:No one writes software for the mac... by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 1

      I rest my case. The fact that you replied to my statement with examples of software proves that I am correct. If I were to say that no one writes software for Windows variants then it would have been laughed off. But you people know that the only software being produced for a Mac is coming from Apple. Sure there are a few examples of software coming out for the Mac from other companies but these all fall into one of two categories. Either it has to do with desktop publishing or they're old software that's finally been ported to the Mac. Face it, the Mac is a dead system and has no future. I mean, don't get mad at me - you're the one who bought the paperweight.

      --
      I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    2. Re:No one writes software for the mac... by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
      I rest my case. The fact that you replied to my statement with examples of software proves that I am correct... But you people know that the only software being produced for a Mac is coming from Apple

      1) All software for the Mac comes from Apple.
      2) Here's examples of software for the Mac from other manufacturers.
      Therefore: 3) All software for the Mac comes from Apple??

      Logic impairment?

      Anyways, those were just some I named off the top of my head. As for old software that's been ported to the Mac - Photoshop, BBEdit, Peak, Deck, ProTools were the examples I mentioned - those are all either Mac-only or originally Mac and ported to Windows later.
      I realize this is just flamebait and trolling, but you're not even close to being real here.

      -T

  163. It's true by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I have no idea to what extent they've adjusted the Speech Recognition in OS X. It may in fact be the same engine, simply running better on a multitasking system.

    More to the point of the topic... I remember reading an article by Andy Ihnatko a while back, wherein he described a home-automation project using X10, AppleScript, a Mac and a series of cheap microphones scattered throughout the house.

    See, the big problem with most speech recognition systems is the problem of speaking within earshot. A mic up close to you will do a pretty good job of pickup obviously, and make the computer's job much faster and more accurate. But if you're already sitting in front of the computer, the speech recognition isn't much good for things other than the supplemental ("Insert Time and Date"). You already have the keyboard and mouse in front of you, which are much faster than many speech commands.

    If you want to walk around your house and issue spoken commands, it's much more feasible to just buy a bunch of cheap PZM and omni microphones from Radio Scrap and put them everywhere. You don't even need that many; just think of the places you tend to 'park' (couch, standing by sink in kitchen, front hall, etc.) and aim appropriately. Doesn't take a lot of bleeding-edge stuff, but the design of how it works is much, much tricker, as one other poster pointed out.

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    1. Re:It's true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hows about you clip a tiny wireless mic to the front of your shirt collar?

  164. Funny.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have most of this already. and years before microsoft.

    It's called Misterhouse it runs on linux, is written in perl and does more than this microsoft house can.

    no lame TV required information, It speaks using the whole house system and using cheap motion detectors to know what rooms to talk in. it has a web based interface so el-cheapo 3com audreys serve as touchscreen points

    oh and is 100% open source so i can make it do what I want, not what microsoft wants.

    Misterhouse.org. it's at least 99.997$ better than anything that microsoft can come up with.

  165. no wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...no wonder MS is full of shit. :-)

  166. All I can say is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Yech. What a horrid future.

    No teen should have a large display. As they
    say in China: Laziness in youth spells regret
    in old age.

  167. no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    toilette for u ... must upgrade to Prof. Version. beep ...

    ------

    FunPic
    Pimps Quest
    Cutiequake

  168. Too Optimistic by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Major innovations which will change the way we live... because people will be willing to pay for them incrementally:

    • Improved material science for hyperallergenic cleanliness, asthetics and fire prevention
    • Improved ventilation and environment control, no more dust bunnies crawling through central air units, ticking radiators, inefficient and inconvenient electric baseboard heaters... no more hotspots, coldspots and lower power bills.
    • Better, cheaper and faster food.
    • Smaller, quieter and more efficient appliances (combined washer/driers, conventional/convection and microwave ovens)
    • More material science and better medical science to develop better chairs, better beds (and better folding beds)
    • Better sound systems and personal entertainment systems.

    What the average schmoe will be absolutely unable to afford:

    • Real-estate within reach of urban employment

    The bigger better jobs will go to home offices, maybe... just maybe... as thoroughly extravegant and self-loving as the Microsoft vision.

    So where does that leave the average person?

    In a one-room apartment with artificial windows (not wonderful wrap-around ones, unless you splurge), a fold-out bed, a washer and drier quiet enough to sleep next to (because that's what you'll be doing), a minimal kitchen (because real-estate and time is more precious than the cost of the new and improved forms of fast food)

    All the while, you will dream of leaving the factory/fast food franchise/service industry to move towards some job you can perform from a home office outside the city.

    But that's just one vision.

  169. A few problems/useless innovations.... by Theaetetus · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Visitors to the house can leave a message via the touch-screen monitor built into the exterior wall or record a message if no one's home.

    No one comes to my door without calling my cell phone first to find out if I'm home. Any one who is coming to my door without calling is some sort of door-to-door marketer/religious person, and I don't want them to leave a message. This seems like an invitation for those cards you get on the windshield of your car when you park downtown, only on your front door.

    The important thing is that unlike a traditional key, a biometric system would identify each resident as they entered and prepare the house accordingly.
    For Heath, this means that as she enters the house, the shades go up, the lights go on and Elvis starts singing.

    I (shades down/lights at medium/soft jazz), my girlfriend (shades up/lights on/pop), my best friend (shades down/lights on full/metal), his girlfriend (shades up/lights on low/classical), and my parents (shades down/lights up full/NPR) all walk in at once... house explodes.

    More realistically, though - what music I want/how bright I want the lights/etc. depends on my mood, how I'm feeling, and how my day was. It's not always going to be the same, in fact it's rarely going to be the same from day to day. Therefore, I would need to specify every time I walked in - which is no different than I have now.

    And why check your e-mail in the front hall, when you can do it from the comfort of your living room on your TV? The television in this house is a whole lot smarter than the average boob tube. It's like Web TV and a personal video recorder combined.

    ... because I don't want my 8 year-old kid seeing "ENLARGE YOUR PENIS!" on my TV?

    So a list of Heath's favourite programs is displayed on screen.
    The show will pick up where she left off the last time she sat down to watch TV.

    Great... so, last night, I was watching pr0n - today I invite my girlfriend over to watch a movie and it pulls up... whoops.

    A text message comes up on screen from a friend - it's all part of the Disneyland-style demo designed to give a sense of how the house might work. She tells the friend she's busy right now, but quickly sends off directions to their next meeting together.

    A text messages comes up on screen from my mistress... while I'm watching TV with my wife. Whoops.
    Or, an obscene text message from my teenage daughter's boyfriend appears while I'm watching TV with her... causing me to ground her for a month. I can see obvious problems there.

    In essence, though computers are faster than I am, they really are not smarter than I am - they can't anticipate my moods/decisions nor can they cope with infinite possibilities and circumstances, including ones they have never encountered before. I want tools that do what I tell them to, not anticipate what they (or some anonymous programmer) thinks I might want.

    -T

    1. Re:A few problems/useless innovations.... by Reziac · · Score: 2, Funny
      I (shades down/lights at medium/soft jazz), my girlfriend (shades up/lights on/pop), my best friend (shades down/lights on full/metal), his girlfriend (shades up/lights on low/classical), and my parents (shades down/lights up full/NPR) all walk in at once... house explodes.

      So you call the warranty center to RMA your house, and are curtly informed that this sort of abuse isn't covered under the warranty.

      (And neither is the mess from when I laughed so hard at your comment that I spilled my breakfast. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:A few problems/useless innovations.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Great... so, last night, I was watching pr0n - today I invite my girlfriend over to watch a movie and it pulls up... whoops.

      A text messages comes up on screen from my mistress... while I'm watching TV with my wife. Whoops.
      Or, an obscene text message from my teenage daughter's boyfriend appears while I'm watching TV with her... causing me to ground her for a month. I can see obvious problems there.

      Problems? Those are solutions! You should be glad that technology would be keeping you and your family accountable.

      Cheating on your wife, especially if it results in divorce, could cause years or decades of heart-wrenching grief, agony, and regret to yourself, your family, and relatives. It is never a good thing. Anything that would help you to not do that is a blessing.

      The main problem is the doing of evil things, not the exposure of evil things already done.

      You said yourself that you would ground your daughter if you knew that her boyfriend was using obscene language. This technology would let you know that! Isn't that a solution? Wouldn't it help you protect your daughter from bad people?

  170. Re:Biometrics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    any quality hand scanner will scan not only fingerprint patterns, but will take pulse and temperature readings to ensure that what they are scanning is actually a living person.

    And what happens if you forget your gloves on a cold winters day? Your house refuses you entry becuase your hand isn't "body temperature". If this happens enough (and it will!), the temp sensors will be turned off by default. (This ignores the use of the 'heat-the-cut-off-hand-to-body-temp' trick.)

    As for pulse, I'm sure that can be defeated as well. Run an electric current through the hand, or something.

    Eye scanner? Can be disabled in, literally, a second by a kid with a can of spray paint. Or a wad of bubblegum. Or lots of other things. Result: you're locked out of your house.

    Biometrics suck. If someone steals your keys, or makes a copy, you can change the locks and get new keys. If someone steals or copies your biometric 'key', (or just gets access to the data the biometic scan produces) you can't change it!

  171. failsafe? by geoff+lane · · Score: 1

    Fire regulations in most countries would require
    all electrically operated doors to fail open should the power fail.

    How big a UPS would your home need to keep it safe during a brown-out?

  172. No biffy? by mwood · · Score: 1

    They're probably still smarting from that sequence in AfterY2K a while back....

  173. Well, actually.. by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    It's not as cool as the Honda robot, but you could start with a few of these from Mitsubishi.

    In fact, I bet that Robert Heinlein would have approved of these more than the House of the Future. If he agreed with his main character in The Door into Summer. Probably.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:Well, actually.. by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Dang, it ate my link! Let's try the magic word again: Mitsubishi!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  174. Bunch of Luddites here! by TFloore · · Score: 1

    Geez, you people still travel on horseback, don't you? Hate these new-fangled "wheel" things that might keep rolling downhill after you want to stop.

    Or maybe you only drive manual-transmission cars because automatic transmissions just don't do everything exactly the way you want them to?

    This is called a "house of hte future" because we aren't ready to make a production version of it right now. How shocking. Complaining that the technology isn't ready is missing the point.

    This is talking about how to make things better. Yes, there is a *lot* to develop before it is ready for production use, but guess what, it will never be ready for production use unless people work on it. Congrats to MS for working on it, and for understanding that it is "future" and not "current" tech. (You did read that paragraph in the article, right?)

    Yes, there will be growing pains. There will be systems that don't work quite right. Guess what, if market forces work the way they are supposed to... bad systems will either improve or die, and good systems will get even better.

    But systems won't improve if people don't work on them. I'd like to see groups other than MS working on it (and guess, what, there are other groups doing this type of R&D also), but a lot of this simply goes under the generic heading of "Making software work with people better" which is a good thing from anyone.

    Frankly, my concerns are less with getting the systems to work right, and more with getting the laws properly made so that your data about you in your house belongs to you only. Engineering problems are easy, legal/privacy problems are hard.

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is... Oops. Frank, I've got your sig again! Where's mine?
    1. Re:Bunch of Luddites here! by Junta · · Score: 1

      Actually, I do *only* drive manual-transmission cars, I like them better, but aside from that..

      The reason why these demoes are always wrong is because the people don't care to follow the particular vision of the designer.

      For example, in this house, computer technology is integrated into places that existed before computers, and that is the vision these people have of how computers should and will be used, which is crap.

      PDAs as light switches? That is horrible. For one, even in the future the price of a light switch versus even a pathetic PDA will cause people to shy from it. For another, the Interface would suck. The only advantage to a PDA is the mobility, you don't want to be tied into a PDA screen in a fixed location, no matter how nice the display (and ruggedized). Turning on lights blindly becomes difficult.

      Another thing is the screen on the front door. That is really a moot point. Now we could do the same thing with a whiteboard if we *really* wanted, but we have never wanted that really. As the article mentions, we have phones now and so people stopped caring so much. Now with cell phones being ubiquitous, they can just call from anywhere, no reason to ever bother going to the front door without calling first. And the bit about listening to only important messages at the front door while taking off my shoes, also not my taste. If people were that obsessed, they would mount their answering machines by the door. Nothing is so critical that it cannot wait for you to walk to the living room instead of the front door. If it is extremely critical, your cell phone already has been called with the message.

      And the notion of using TVs instead of computers... well WebTV has shown us just how crazy people are about *that* concept. Monitors at the intended distance suck for text. No matter how good the display is, the eyes don't like reading a lot of text on a display that is supposed to be 7 foot or more away. I do not want IM, email, and web on my TV, I would get bad eye strain.

      The 'home' of the future focuses on bringing computer interfaces to places where people really don't want it. The trend is clear, mobility is what they want. Maybe embedded computerized gadgets here and there, but laptops, PDAs, cell phones are really the realm for communications and information gathering. I have a computer with a TV display rigged up for movies and some gaming. I use a laptop for everything else. Link email, IM, and phone messaging all into one and you have something more along the lines of what a lot of people want.

      Though still off, the Office of the future is a bit more on target. Microsoft understands the office environment a bit better. Except the surround display, which I think would be good for gaming and certain types of work, but wouldn't bring too much benefit for average computer workers. Peripheal vision isn't good enough to really use for anything...

      Basically, this 'home of the future' suffers from the same thing all homes of the futures that have preceeded it. They used to want to put phones, videophones, and televisions in weird places and combine them in various ways. And consumers respond to the prospect by saying neato, but I don't *want* a TV there, I don't *want* people to see me when I'm on the phone with them, I want devices to stay separate, they are easier to use that way. Same here. People want light switches to control lights. They want thermostats separate. They want computers to be separate. Things get too hard to understand if everything becomes part of one complex gadget instead of many, simple gadgets.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  175. What Every Good Bathroom Needs by theManInTheYellowHat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am turning my home into a low budget high tech house (sic) and I have thought about running wires and mounting a pc (or 2) in there. One would be for reading the news while on the throne. Which would allow for the removal of the magazine stack / rack.
    The other would be water proof and play music in the shower. I would use shorten instead of mp3, but that is me.

  176. the good news is.. by geekoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ..Microsoft will sell these at a loss, and the Linux Community will snatch them up and get Linux running on them.

    I do't think most peopel want a house like this. We have the technology to do much of this now, hell we have had the technology for keyless entry for years, but we still use keys. How many people have to(or can) conduct business from home? 1% of the population? In this community it is probably higher, but overall its pretty damn low.

    SOme of the stuff is cool, but I would only consider it if I controlled how the computers work.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  177. Microsoft's new slogan... by happers · · Score: 1

    "Happiness is like pissing your pants...everybody can see it but only you can feel the warmth!" :oP

  178. They had one in an early alpha version... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but it was paperless, and the testing was just too messy.

  179. tech support by Reziac · · Score: 1

    Oh, lordy -- I just had the most horrible vision involving M$ Home and outsourced tech support.

    "But sir, your toilet is supposed to work that way... No, I'm in India. Why do you ask?"

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  180. Hmm... makes me wonder if... by Cheese+Cracker · · Score: 2, Funny

    you have to frequently reboot the oven... that would spoil the Thanksgiving dinner... :(

  181. on the other hand... by Cruciform · · Score: 3, Funny

    Linux's home of tomorrow does have a bathroom... you just need the permissions to use it.

  182. It was an attempt to get /.'rs to go read the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fucking article first before posting.

    At least it should have been.
    Our luck it's just a simple fuck up.

  183. MS's Home of Tomorrow is already here by garoush · · Score: 1

    With controls over our lives with MS's Home of Tomorrow -- all that you need to do is stay over at a hospital.

    --

    Karma stuck at 50? Add 2-5 inches.. err.. 2-5x Karmas Count to your pen1es.. err.. Karma all naturally and private
  184. Great... Hardware wizard 2.7 *sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    snip
    Hardware, our guide explains, will be smarter and more coordinated so less configuration is required to share devices. Your tablet PC will locate the closest printer, so you don't need to select it from a list or type in a long path name when you try to print from a new location.
    snip

    FUCK THAT SHIT! You already can't get the damn
    "New Hardware Wizard" to tell the difference between
    a modem and a scanner! You think I'm going to appreciate
    my computer printing to the damn printer in the
    next cubicle instead of mine because 6 paperclips
    on my desk interfered with the reception of MY printer?

    More goddamn "Auto-Fucked-Up-Mation" by M$ does NOT
    give me warm fuzzies.

    Their current Hardware wizard needs massive cataract
    surgery. Somehow the thought of a NEW wizard
    just isn't even remotely appealing. *sigh*

  185. Re: Programming a Microwave by redfenix · · Score: 1

    ...you'd have to manually program in each barcode and tell the microwave how long it would take to cook...

    Or the microwave could just remember how long you cooked it the last time. Or it could reference the UPC against an online database of cooking times (kinda like cddb, but for food.)

    --Kevin

    --
    "It's a very tangled subsystem." --Windows kernel guru
  186. A Microsoft home? No thanks.. by CONTROL_ALT_F4 · · Score: 3, Funny

    The last thing I want to hear when I get home from a hard days work....D000d! 3y3 h4xx0R3d Ur h0wS3!!

  187. M$ Home of Future Has No Bathrooms by fuzdout · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who realised that "no bathroom" also means no *SHOWER*??! (Besides, no toilet!)
    EUUGHHHHHHH! SMELLY!!

    Perhaps Bill Gates has decided that humans will have evolved passed the need to bath and urinate and deficate...I don't think so!

    As for a M$ toilet, I would assume the same old "click and drag" method of disposal would still apply.

    --
    Fuzdout
    ..My sig ran away. Has anyone seen my sig?
  188. "trusted housing" by ethereal · · Score: 1

    I trust Microsoft with my housing exactly as much as their "Trusted Computing" initiative trusts me with my computer :)

    --

    Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  189. Obligatorty Simpsons ref by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1


    Matthew Perry voice: "Could I BE any more of a house???"

  190. A neural network house by pjp6259 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Dr. Mike Mozer is a professor of Computer Science (specializing in artificial Neural Networks (ANNs)). He has renovated an old school house near Boulder, Colorado and given it multiple sensors, and controls, and hooked all of this up to an adaptive learning system. For example his house has motion sensors and can control the lights, so when you walk into the bathroom the lights come on automatically.

    He never had to program this particular function, but because the house "saw" that everytime there was movement in the bathroom the lights were turned on, it learned to turn the lights on itself. Similarly, a microphone in the living room can determine that the TV has been turned on, and dim the lights to the correct level. I believe the house also predicts what fans and AC/heating to turn on based upon time of day, temperature outside, time of year, day of week, etc. And the best part is you don't have to figure out the optimal logic yourself, but the house learns it from watching your behaviour.

    You can find more information about this experiment here The best part is that much of the work was done by graduate students, and much of the funding came from grants.

    --
    Computers don't make mistakes. What they do, they do on purpose.
  191. Re:Let's put this together with MS's rep for secur by Galvatron · · Score: 1

    I believe that's "Open Sesame."

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  192. Good For Microsoft by diablobynight · · Score: 1

    I am glad microsoft is around and has a lot of money. Otherwise no one would be able to afford to research the fun digital toys of the future. And I am damn glad it isn't a linux driven house, because if you don't have enough pipe to the outside world you can't download the 300MB kernel upgrade and spend the next day waiting for your house to be done compiling it.

    --
    Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
    1. Re:Good For Microsoft by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Seen a windows service pack lately? If not, I'll tell you they're around 150MBs about now. At least SP3 for Win2k is. The last kernel update I downloaded for linux was about 30MBs. I didn't need to compile anything, either.

      BTW, your comment shows you might not know as much about microsoft as you think. For the greater part of their history, they've done nothing but re-implemented ideas already done by others. From the Windows interface/OS, to the DOS OS, to MSN IM, to the X-BOX, to Windows Media, to Microsoft Excel, Word, Access, and powerpoint, Microsoft has consistently been significatly late to the market, usually with lower quality products than the competition. Only after being able to stay in those markets with products which lose money for a huge amount of time are they able to overtake the competition in that arena, and usually even that only happens because the competition has been severely weakened by Microsofts anti-competitive practices.

      Actually, Microsoft is a lot like OSS that way. That explains why the virtually indestructable worldwide volunteer movement(I know, it's a dirty word, volunteer, how dare those commies spend time doing something they enjoy without asking for compensation!!) is making MS sweat so much -- it can do all the things MS has done itself to gouge their product into a market and kill competition, but on a whole new level.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    2. Re:Good For Microsoft by diablobynight · · Score: 1

      Oh give me a break. Microsoft ripped off it's OS and linux didn't? Ummm...sit down at a unix server sometime and ask yourself, what does this look like? Talk about a direct copy. And by the way, MS DOS, was purchased from someone who couldn't see it's potential. Microsoft is a smart business and if it wasn't for them all we would have is Macs because IBM never would have gotten into the PC market. So you better thank the microsoft gods next time you boot up your new 3Ghz sledgehammer that will hit the market in a few months.

      --
      Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
    3. Re:Good For Microsoft by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Oh give me a break. Microsoft ripped off it's OS and linux didn't?
      well, I did say...
      Actually, Microsoft is a lot like OSS that way...

      I swear I did. I don't have to defend that point of view, because I never thought OSS was paticularly innovative. I didn't just finish saying that I was glad Linux had all this money to spend researching toys. *My* point is that MS is never first to the market, and always copy pre-established designs. Yeah, their R&D is soooo great. Look at all the innovation they've done over the years -- they've copied CPM, they've copied their entire office suite from other people who were first to market with these new toys. Windows is a copy of MAC. BASIC is a copy of public domain code. IE is a copy of Netscape and Mosaic. It's not MS concieving these cool new toys -- heck, it's not even MS putting these things on the market first. So don't applaud them for inventing anything.

      As for your insinuation that IBM would never have gotten into the PC market if Microsoft hadn't lied to them and said they had an OS ready, consider this quote: "The dog wags the tail. The tail doesn't wag the dog". Microsoft was *one* person at the time. In fact, Microsoft was one person who even then wasn't a beacon of sound business ethics(see: stealing code from Xerox, using computer time at harvard innapropriately,

      --
      It's been a long time.
    4. Re:Good For Microsoft by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Clip everything from "microsoft was *one*..." on. I meant to delete that. I realize MS was at least two people from the getgo, and that not everyone considers what gates did stealing.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    5. Re:Good For Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is windows a copy of MAC, if you were around you would know that Windows came out on foriegn PCs with a gui before macintosh systems hit the market, sorry buddy, maybe you watched that made for tv to many times about steve jobs and microsoft, because everythin you just posted is from it, but if your a little older like I am. You know that what Bill did to xerox wasn't stealing unless you see, what Dana did to Spicer as stealing. He took a technology they let him look at. It was up for grabs and he implemented it and had the vision to sell it to the right people.

    6. Re:Good For Microsoft by ces · · Score: 1

      Actually I think Microsoft had somewhere between 10 and 20 people when IBM came calling.

      They had been doing applications for CP/M and the Apple ][ for a few years by then. They were selling or licensing versions of BASIC for most micros and had a few applications as well, multiplan and a very early version of Flight Simulator.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
  193. linux version seven.9875656 by diablobynight · · Score: 1

    There would be a toilet and a shower in a linux house, but you would need to debug the crappy GNU code yourself and hope to recompile your toilet before you have to crap. or everyone would have a different distro of linux and you would never be able to figure out how your friend's toilet works

    --
    Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
  194. Just where are these homes going to go? by forkboy · · Score: 1

    How are they planning on implementing this technology? Are they only going to build it into new houses? I got news for you, there ain't much space left in the US for new homes anywhere near a metropolitan or suburb area. Upgrade existing houses? That will probably cost more than building one from scratch....you're talking rewiring the phone/electrical system, installing wall mounted speakers, screens, and sensors, and lord knows what else. The house I live in right now was built in 1925...it barely has any 3 prong electrical outlets.

    I won't even get started on the security and privacy issues of this whole concept, but I'm betting that the cost could be subsidized by advertisers and manufacturers interested in paying through the nose for the marketing data and advertising oppurtunities available in something like this.

    This article scared the hell out of me. I am not excited by this technology in the least.

    --
    This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  195. Homes of the future of the past by interociter · · Score: 1
    Here's a thought: what happens with the pets? My cat roams around the house all day and all night, jumping up on counters, bookshelves, couches, etc. I foresee Mulder triggering automatic settings, accidentally turning the stereo on, then racing to the other end of the house, terrified at the noise.

    Doesn't anyone remember DOG GONE MODERN, the Warner Brothers' cartoon where two dogs wander into the "Home of Tomorrow"?

    Morover, if there's a biometic lock on the door, what kinds of easter eggs might the DoJ require in order to "combat terrorism"? Perhaps the doors automatically lock if anyone with an arrest warrant is detected on the premises? Chemical sensors alert the police if marijuana smoke is detected? Your health insurance provider is alerted if tobacco smoke is detected? If too much fatty food is prepared in the kitchen, another alert goes to your health insurance provider?

    And here'a a thought about MS Toilet(tm): what's to stop them from building in a urinalysis kit and reporting the results to your employer, the police, or whoever else is interested? "Hi Bob, this is Fred at State Farm. I notice that since your 15-year-old daughter became pregnant, you've started drinking a lot. Now, I realize this is a trying time for you, but we're going to have to raise your rates in order to offset the added risk. By the way, we notice that your son has been flushing a lot of condoms in the past month, but we aren't detecting any estrogen in the urine passed around those flushes. Also, we detected several different DNA matches on the semen in those condoms. Would you like to see a list?"

    --
    Interociter
    -=What do I want? I'm an American. I want more.
  196. all that shiny stuff... by Petersson · · Score: 1

    hey I want my houseputer to serve me, not that I'm gonna be just another houseputer process.. I would prefer it to do quite a different thinks, like:
    -guarding the house when NOBODY_AT_HOME is set to 1, making logs
    -energy saving together with comfort - I don't need the central heating to heat when nobody's home, and start heating/cooling in advance, so that when I come, temperature will be fine
    -watching for windows/doors not closed locked properly, just like in car
    -sensing fire and water/gas leaks
    -to have my music collection stored on very large capacity media, easily accessable
    -99.9999999999% reliability (or more :))
    -e.g. automated medical analysis of urine
    -to kiss me nicely even if I come home late :)
    Also, another displays to gaze on is really the last thing I wish :) gentle voice + voice recognition is preffered, houseputer console shall exist but mostly for maintenance and setup...

    --
    I'm not insane. My mother had me tested.
  197. Bit late, but... by Yer+Mum · · Score: 1

    Orange (UK mobile phone operator) has been at this kind of thing for ages...

    http://www.orange.com/English/forwardthinking/Or an geathome.asp

    (all the links on the right underneath "Orange at home")

  198. i've been there by cornjones · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been there and it _was_ pretty cool.

    Two things that I didn't see in the article.

    One of the ideas is that every product sold will have an RF tag. supposedly in a couple of years the tags are going to be down to a penny or two. The tags id whatever you bring into your house and add it too the "house inventory". one thing that scared me was when she mentioned that the house could check your insurance policy and if you weren't covered by you current policy they could contact you to upsell. uhhh, obviously designed w/ the business rather than the customer in mind.

    another thing about the door. the door is magnetically locked. you bio scan in and it lets you in. there was no keyhole that I saw. what happens when the power goes out? either you are locked in or the door is open. neither is acceptable.

    the house was pretty cool though. it had a great digital art sculpture. some random piece of artfully bent plastic. when you get close it illuminates from inside with pictures and videos from your media library. if you see a picture you like, say your trip to greece, you touch the picture and then all the pictures are from that trip or media group. Tres chic. a great way to display all that digital media we have been collecting.

    1. Re:i've been there by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      All bio-locks I'm aware of (See the Assa Abloy group of lock and door hardware companies for reference) use battery backup units built into the wall, door or door frame.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  199. what if its a pirated version? by abhisarda · · Score: 1

    What if your version of Microsoft "Home" is pirated?Do you have to live like a fugitive in your own home? What about registration? Are you going to be unknown to anybody other than the people living in the house?

  200. Re:toilet freezes by abhisarda · · Score: 1

    What are you going to do if you toilet freezes on you when your almost done? You'll get a message " No toilet paper for you today naughty boy"

  201. Safe Biometric additions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It is to the person looking at the 'eyeball', but a computer is stupid. If the eye retinal pattern matches, which it should being either from a live person, or 'fresh'."

    Just to add to what other's have mentioned - there is no problem in adding a dynamic scanning system which checks for saccadic (small almost random) eye movements which only occur with a living eye in a normal face.

    Similarly other additions can be made to fingerprint scanners (remove the plate fingers press against and instead have a camera system with an IR sensor - check for blood flow/temp); face scanners (again check for heat emission, random movements against stable background, have 2 or more cameras offset, so now get a 3d signature of a face and can't be fooled by flat picture of face etc.)...

    My point is that as biometric systems are increasingly used, these additions will automatically be used, and so the security of the systems will improve - what we have at the moment are still basic test models.

  202. Microsoft's response to No Bathroom (choose one) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - "Shit Happens"

    - "The bathroom option is not included in the Home Edition. The upgrade cost is $500,000."

  203. House of Pain! by rune2 · · Score: 1

    I'd rather not have to "activate" my house every time I want to add something new. And would you really want a company that has this much trouble with the notion of security to be controlling access to your house? And knowing Microsoft you have to get the Microsoft car so that it would be compatible with the house.... it's all in the bundling you see... Now on the other hand if you stuck the Osbournes in the Microsoft house you'd have comedy gold! :-)

  204. Meh. by garrett791 · · Score: 0

    I saw the Home of the Future a couple of years ago; I wasn't really impressed. Microsoft must be looking to get some advertising, though, because they made me sign an NDA when I visited. Oh, and when I went, they actually did track people's location in the house with motion sensors. I guess it was seen as a little too invasive, even for Microsoft.

  205. Hello? This is a VISA courtesy call by jabber01 · · Score: 1

    Yes. Is this Mr. Jabber? Hello sir. We're just calling to tell you that we really appreciate your business. Also, we've observed that if you transfer your current American Express Purple SecureCard balance to VISA today, you can save up to $37 this year.

    Also, your car is 14 miles overdue for an oil change and the service can be performed at the station across the street from your place of business. Since you usually arrive at work 15 minutes late, we have taken the liberty of setting your alarm clocks a little early. We'll also be billing the oil chance service to your Visa.

    Thank you for using Visa.

    Oh, and by the way, your grandma has fallen, and she can't get up. We'll gladly send medical assistance, for the customary fee of $39.99.

    I'll be damned if I live in that world.

    --

    The REAL jabber has the user id: 13196
    What you do today will cost you a day of your life

  206. Steve Jobs Is My Cousin by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 1

    Go to EB or Babbage's or Office Max or Best Buy or any store that sells both Mac and PC software. Compare the number of titles for the Mac to the number for the PC. Then, after you've realized I'm smart and you're a fucking douchebag, apologize to me. Okay penis wrinkle?

    --
    I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
  207. Homes for the futureless? by makanaka · · Score: 0, Troll

    Corporate America is frighteningly absurd. Several dozen people have died from a cold wave in your country, thousands are homeless and crowding the few shelters that exist, and a company that boasts of among the biggest market capitalisations is touting 'homes for the future'. What future for whom?

  208. Bee up my butt as you put it by diablobynight · · Score: 1

    The bee up my butt about OSS is that I never used to hate any OS. I have linux running my router box, and have a Unix server here at work for the CAD people. I have 5 SGIs here at work and I can use them all with no troubles. My problem is that I get online and start reading and everyone tries to make Linux sound like it's some rediculously amazing piece of software that is only held back by some evil plot of Microsoft. Microsoft is a business, whose constant upgrading has pushed the hardware market forward at a rate so fast it's hard to believe. And I read quotes like "With my old linux I can run my 200mhz Pentium 2 and I don't have to upgrade". Why do people think that's a good thing. If microsoft wasn't forcing the consumer to buy new hardware what would be the computer industries reason to develop new hardware? I say if the cost of getting to watch 64 bit 3Ghz processors come out is that I had to turn a paperclip off, then so be it. I wouldn't hate linux if it's party wagon wasn't so engulfed in itself. A bunch of elitest who feel that because they can use linux they have accomplished some amazing feat and they are beyond all other OS users. Why are so many articles about Linux beating Microsoft, if all you guys care about is making a great OS for yourselves then why do you care if it becomes an industry standard? The point is that I think Bill Gates is more altruistic then most men in power and he shouldn't be painted so poorly in the public eye. He saw what the industry needed to get started and he gave it to us. Don't tell me about him stealing the first OS, because I don't care, even Linux is "stolen" from a lot of Unix IP. I guess the point is, Microsoft is never even given a chance when it tries to do something that could be great, because your all to bitter, like ex-girlfriends that can't be happy when their boyfriend gets a new job.

    --
    Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
    1. Re:Bee up my butt as you put it by neuroticia · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. Your rationale sounds like my reasons for being so [bitchy pissy ranty ravy angry hell-bent-against] OS X--if people would just shut up about Revolutionary-Wonderful-Thewayofthefuture-Fantasti c-100%there, then I'd admit it's one hell of an idea, but because there's at least 400% hype surrounding it, I want to take my Mac and throw it through the window whenever someone says "OS X is wonderful".

      The reason this is DIFFERENT from the Linux-issue is that Linux is a GOOD OS, and it's free, and if I have a problem with it I can CHANGE it. (I have.) It gives me a variety of choices. I don't believe Linux has to triumph over Microsoft, in fact I think that everyone should have a multiboot system. Mine boots between a flavor of BSD, two flavors of Linux, Win2k, WinXP, and Win98, I wouldn't feel functional without these choices. Yes, that's right. I'm one of the Linux-heads, and I wouldn't want to try working without WinXP and 2K on my system.

      Just because people are fanatics doesn't mean you need to go trashing a decent OS, and a movement that IS good. My mom can't afford a new computer, and doesn't have needs to justify taking out another mortage on her house to fund the latest and greatest of hardware--For her, Linux IS a godsend. Me- I buy nice new shiny toys that can run the latest greates MS OS and KDE (if that's not bloatware, what is?) My line of work justifies me having faster hardware. My mom doesn't need it--she uses only 5% of Windows 95's capabilities--why in the world would she need Windows XP?

      The ability to run Linux on a slow machine is godsend. Not for everyone, but for those who seriously cannot afford the latest and greatest, and have no pressing need for it. When I was 15 I owned my first computer. It would only run DOS... A 286 with 512K of RAM and a 40MB hard drive. This was in 1995, and Windows95 was coming out, and I was plugging happily away on DOS, but running into limitations right and left. If I translated that situation into today, I could easily just throw Linux onto today's equivilent of that old 286 machine and have a powerful fully functional OS that wouldn't limit me in any way. With Windows I'd be stuck with Win95--something I do not consider all that functional.

      -Sara

  209. About the MS house... by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 1

    Actually the best material about the MS house was written back when Bill G's new home was nearing completion. I particularly liked the furniture stacker. There wasn't enough space in the room for all of the furniture so it was stacked in the corner. You'd unstack what you needed and stack it back up when done. The other was when the toilet backed up. Everyone had to exit the house and then reboot the water main from the street and then go back in the house and use the toilet.

    I realize that I wasn't anywhere near accurate with the GPL-house I was just going for a little humor/irony. We'll have to submit that new tag to the W3C to make things like that more obvious.

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
  210. Quick, go tell the JW's by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 1

    Apparently all those Kingdom Halls that they've built simply are impossible.

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
  211. M$ does have a BUG as mascot. So live with it by northwind · · Score: 0, Troll

    Bathrooms got dumped by their buggy filter.
    Or maybe there is something we don't know about Micro$oft employees?
    Maybe gates does come from an alternate reality????

  212. My wife do that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever heard of a wife? My wife is an excellent cook and does stuff that Microsoft cant. theres no way in hell that I'm going to replace her with Microsoft Home!

  213. job is taken by twitter · · Score: 1
    .in which the current dumb-user-centric model has ascended to the point that it begins to conquer volition and personal descision making. The computer tells you what ingrediants to pick in the kitchen, it worrys about how many guests you have, and then tells you a recipie apropos to them... perhaps, soon enough, an earpiece will tell you what to say to them...

    This level of automation is only apropriate to the mentally handicapped or infirm!

    Or the married. My wife does all that already. Contrary advice would last about 30 seconds.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.