Slashdot Mirror


Blacker Than Black

An anonymous reader writes "British scientists at the National Physical Laboratory in London have invented the darkest material on Earth. 'It could revolutionise optical instruments because it reflects 10 to 20 times less light than the black paint currently used to reduce unwanted reflections. The key to the nickel and phosphorous coating's blackness is that its surface is pitted with microscopic craters.' Wonder how effective it would be as a solar heating surface ?"

294 of 432 comments (clear)

  1. What's blacker than black... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What's blacker than black... ...a new nickel and phosphorous coating with microscopi...

    You know? The joke just isn't as funny this way.

    1. Re:What's blacker than black... by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Humm....

      It's obvious that it's highly non-reflective in the visible portion of the spectrum, the question is how "black" is it in other spectrum regimes. Is it equally black in the IR, and/or UV?

      Also, remember that a good absorber is a good emitter.

      --
      "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
    2. Re:What's blacker than black... by agallagh42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is it blacker than Hotblack Desiato's stunt ship?

      "It's so ... black!" said Ford Prefect, "you can hardly make out its shape ... light just seems to fall into it!"
      Zaphod said nothing. He had simply fallen in love.
      The blackness of it was so extreme that it was almost impossible to tell how close you were standing to it.
      "Your eyes just slide off it ..." said Ford in wonder. It was an emotional moment. He bit his lip.

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
    3. Re:What's blacker than black... by Raiford · · Score: 3, Informative
      A little physics awnsers this. No ! If the surface is optically rough as resulting from these little microcraters then internal specular reflection will only occur for wavelengths smaller than the crater size. Diffraction will occur as you get to sizes on the order of the crater size and just plane old specular reflection from a rough surface will occur for wavelengths larger than the crater size. This is a simple explanation but it captures the idea of how this kind of thing works. If the material already has a fairly high intrinsic absorptivity then multiple internal reflection will cause the effective reflectivity to be extremely low. Longer wavelengths will have a tendancy to not even see the little craters and probably give a higher reflectivity. There are things that make the problem more complex. There are most likely a distribution of crater sizes that interact differently with the incident light and the intrinsic absorptivity of the material is most likely dispersive (dependent on the wavelength of the incident radiation).

      --
      "player 4 hit player 1 with 0 stroms"
    4. Re:What's blacker than black... by mr.+methane · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Will it skew the test results if the researchers eat more than 50% of the sample?

      Surprisingly, a big application for this is in video gear. Like in a projection TV, you want to have as little stray light bouncing around as possible, and what you can't control, you at least want to be as uniform as possible across the entire area.

      Currently, the home theater equivalent of the overclocking crowd rips open RPTV's to line them with a black, light-absorbing cloth called "duvatyne" - I think it was originally designed for the theater industry for a similar purpose.

  2. Wonderment by SanLouBlues · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wonder how effective it would be as a solar heating surface ?
    That probably depends on the specific heat of the material.

    I myself wonder how physically resilient this material is, what it's impedance is, and whether it isn't extremely similar the blackbird surface material.

    1. Re:Wonderment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wonder how effective it would be as a solar heating surface ?

      It wouldn't make much difference, because changing from absorbing 97.5% of the sunlight to 99.65% isn't going to change the economics of your solar collector much.

      However if you are building a telescope and you want to reduce the stray reflections, going from reflecting 2.5% to reflecting 0.35% is a huge improvement

    2. Re:Wonderment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Hm, if normal black paint absorbs (read: transforms to heat) 97.5 per cent and 'super-black' absorbs 99.65 per cent, I would guess that 'super-black' is about 99.65/97.5-times as effective as normal black paint, thus about two per cent more effective.

      I'd go for solar cells.

    3. Re:Wonderment by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Blackbird the plane? SR-71?

    4. Re:Wonderment by SanLouBlues · · Score: 1

      My bad, I meant the F117.

    5. Re:Wonderment by cnkeller · · Score: 1
      and whether it isn't extremely similar the blackbird surface material.

      If you are referring to the SR71, the color is actually indigo blue, not black. The SR-71 Indigo Bluebird doesn't sound quite as cool though. I do not recall the surface of the SR71 being anything but smooth.

      --

      there are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots

    6. Re:Wonderment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      For solar heating, you want a surface that absorbs well in the visible (where incident solar radiation has most of its power) and emits poorly in the IR (where a body near room temperature radiates the most). Good absorption equates to good emission. Therefore, you don't actually want a "black" surface. You want an infrared colored surface.

      This new material might actually qualify, if the pits are large compared to visible wavelengths but small compared to IR wavelengths.

    7. Re:Wonderment by racermd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The F117A is called the Nighthawk. However, most pilots call it the "Wobblin' Gobblin" because it's aerodynamically unstable requiring computer-controlled corrections at a very high frequency while in-flight. Early tests didn't have the computer code particularly tweaked so the aircraft tended to shimmy around (wobble) quite a bit.

      The shape of the aircraft is designed to reflect the majority of radio waves directly away from the source and the coating is designed to absorb the remaining radio frequencies, not light. But it does appear to be based on the same priciple as this super-black material. From what I understand of RAM (Radar Absorbing Material), there are small pockets on the surface that are designed to trap and scatter the radio waves until they've almost completely dissipated. The color of the material is rather arbitrary, as I've seen it painted in "desert-camo" in photos taken before it was made public (to hide it better against the sandy-colored ground in the desert where it was being tested). Just before being made public, it was painted black to hide better at night in the sky, which is it's intended primary operating time/environment. Making it even *more* black wouldn't make it much more "stealthy". If you're looking for IR signatures, the engine exhaust would probably be more of a giveaway even though it's cooled to about 800F or so. And because it's in the sky, a UV scan would probably be useless as space (the sky's background) is filled with UV. Blocking even more UV makes it a black mark on a light background.

      I might have a use for this super-black material to coat the insides of my projection TV, as well as cover the windows during movie nights! Perhaps even using this on road signs in addition to the super-relective paint the DOT already uses can make road signs easier to see at night due to increased contrast and less glare. Oh, and telescopes, too. Kinda neat, overall.

      --
      My sources are unreliable, but their information is fascinating. -- Ashleigh Brilliant
  3. Solar heating! by keller · · Score: 5, Funny
    Wonder how effective it would be as a solar heating surface ?

    I would say that the solar surface is hot enough as it is!

    --

    Enig? Det alt for hot det smor!

  4. And with one fell swoop.... by CHUD-Wretch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Goths just got scarier. "Black as night, faster than a shadow" -Judas Priest- "Hell Bent For Leather"

    --
    "Suburbia is where the developer bulldozes out the trees, then names the streets after them."
    1. Re:And with one fell swoop.... by OblvnDrgn · · Score: 3, Funny

      Good point. You've never someone say the line, "I'm only wearing black until something darker comes along?" I didn't think one of them would actually be RIGHT.

      It shouldn't make much of a difference to the poser-goths in their parent's basement though. They're already covered with a cratered surface.

    2. Re:And with one fell swoop.... by Tet · · Score: 1
      Goths just got scarier.

      "I'm only wearing black until someone invents a darker colour". Looks like someone was listening, and my wishes have been answered...

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    3. Re:And with one fell swoop.... by Kelt · · Score: 3, Funny

      Now my woman has to re-do her whole wardrobe in a new uber-black color... great...

      -Kelt

      --
      My intelligence insults itself.
  5. 10 to 20 times less? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    If it reflected one times less that'd mean it was reflecting nothing at all, so what happens when it reflects 10 times less?

    1. Re:10 to 20 times less? by Doomrat · · Score: 1

      What?

      Look, it's simple. 'Black' paint would normally reflect a small amount of light. This new stuff reflects 1/10 times that amount.

    2. Re:10 to 20 times less? by Doomrat · · Score: 1

      Well done, you've proved nothing except that ratios are beyond you. :)

    3. Re:10 to 20 times less? by SirHalcyon · · Score: 1

      good point, also:

      "reflects 10 to 20 times less light than the black paint"

      and further down

      "reflects less than 0.35%. Black paint reflects about 2.5% - seven times more."

      so would someone please explain how 7 == 10->20?

    4. Re:10 to 20 times less? by You're+All+Wrong · · Score: 4, Informative

      If old stuff reflects X, and new stuff reflects 90% less, then new stuff reflects X-X*(90/100) = 0.1*X.

      If old stuff reflects X, and new stuff reflects 100% less, then new stuff reflects zero.

      With me still?

      100% of X _is_ one times X.

      Ten times X _is_ 1000% of X.

      With me still?

      Something that reflects 10 times less than the old stuff reflects 1000% less than the old stuff, and therefore reflects -9*X.

      With me still?

      The original wording is misleading. The original complaint against it was valid. Instead they should have put something more like:

      The new material reflects 1/10th to 1/20th of the amount that the old material reflected.

      The new material is 10 to 20 times less reflective than the old material.

      YAW.

      --
      Your head of state is a corrupt weasel, I hope you're happy.
    5. Re:10 to 20 times less? by one9nine · · Score: 1

      7 is equal to 10 - 20 for signifigantly large values of 7.

    6. Re:10 to 20 times less? by Doomrat · · Score: 1

      Amen to that.

    7. Re:10 to 20 times less? by Doomrat · · Score: 1

      Not only are you being a pedantic fool about wording which is really quite acceptable even if not 100% correct when taken literally, but you use ratios like 90/100. And you can stop explaining it now, we understood it in the first place. I hate it when people think that not agreeing with something means misunderstanding it.

    8. Re:10 to 20 times less? by famebait · · Score: 1

      It all works out, even mathematically, if you just understand rations, and define 'little' not as the negative of 'much', but as the inverse. Which makes a lot more sense anyway.

      So "lessitude" = 1/amount. Got it?

      "x is ten times less than y"
      => lessitude(x) = 10 * lessitude (y)
      => 1/amount(x) = 10 / amount(y)
      => amount(x) = amount(y)/10
      => "x is one tenth of y".

      It works across the board:
      If you approach zero amount, you also approach infinitely little.
      If your amount approaches infinite, that's hardly little all, is it?

      So where is the neutral point? When is something neither little nor a lot, or rephrased, as much as it is little? When they are both one of course. What that actually means will depend on your unit of measurement, as well it should.

      Same goes for fast/slow, large/small and all the other favourites of people who prefer complaining about other peoples' alleged errors over figuring things out.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    9. Re:10 to 20 times less? by famebait · · Score: 1

      That was at right angles. It said it was particularly effective with light coming in from the side. Read.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    10. Re:10 to 20 times less? by You're+All+Wrong · · Score: 1

      You put "10 times smaller than X" in quotes.
      Who are you quoting? It's not the sentence the original AC made his dig at, and that I pedantically spelt out an interpretaion of.

      I respectfully advise you to get a fucking Dick and Jane book and fucking learn to read.

      See YAW. See YAW flame. Flame YAW flame.

      You appear to know a lot about asses - your head's stuck up one.

      YAW.

      --
      Your head of state is a corrupt weasel, I hope you're happy.
  6. Stealth car! by Harald74 · · Score: 2

    Need I say more?

    --
    A)bort, R)etry or S)elf-destruct?
    1. Re:Stealth car! by g4dget · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sure bet for the Darwin award.

    2. Re:Stealth car! by pVoid · · Score: 1

      Yes you need.

  7. black by qoncept · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My high school physics teacher had a piece of "black," though not as black as this. He said he'd put it against walls and students sitting at the other end of the room would think there was a hole, he said. By the time I saw it, it was old and had gotten too dusty to be very impressive.

    --
    Whale
    1. Re:black by Keith_Beef · · Score: 4, Funny

      That must have been the same piece of black, made by the Acme company, that Wile E. Coyote used to put against a rock when he was trying to catch Woody Woodpecker.

    2. Re:black by woozlewuzzle · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, Wile E Coyote used to chase the Roadrunner.

    3. Re:black by cHALiTO · · Score: 1

      Or like when Sylvester tries to catch Pixie and Dixie! (?)

      --
      "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
    4. Re:black by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wile E. Coyote never tried to catch Woody Woodpecker. He was always trying to catch the Road Runner.

    5. Re:black by frp001 · · Score: 1

      Anyone has a link to the ACME web site?

      --
      May I use your sig please?
    6. Re:black by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      Here, or here

    7. Re:black by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, Wile E Coyote used to chase the Roadrunner.

      Yes, but he was trying to catch Woody Woodpecker. A large part of Wiley's problems are caused by his extremely poor eyesight...

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    8. Re:black by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 1, Funny

      My favourite was the late one in which the Road Runner runs down a pipe that first narrows and the enlarges. Each animal shrinks to fit, but only the bird returns to his normal size. He pauses outside the pipe, and Wiley finally catches up to him, only to stand on his foot, perhaps two inches tall, and hold up a tiny sign that says something like, "You've always wanted me to catch him... now what do I do?"

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    9. Re:black by bgarcia · · Score: 1, Funny
      Why is this moderated as "Informative"?

      Are there actually 2 moderators out there who said "Damn, you mean Wile E. Coyote was chasing a Road Runner? Boy that sure was an informative post. I better mark it as such!"

      You two should be ashamed. Give up the rest of your moderator points. You don't deserve them.

      --
      I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    10. Re:black by Mignon · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      Give up the rest of your moderator points.

      People are supposedly selling virtual gear for online adventure games. I wonder how long before we see mod points up for sale on Ebay.

    11. Re:black by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      I never had any intentions of being moderated up to +5, especially by being moderated as +1 Informative.

      However, it's their moderation points. It was informative for someone who didn't know. Maybe they are not as culturally as informed as you and I. If other people don't feel that it should be moderated as +1 informative, then it will be meta-moderated as such or moderated as -1 Overrated.

    12. Re:black by master_p · · Score: 1

      Correction: Wile E. Coyote chased Road Runner, not Woody Woodpecker.

    13. Re:black by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Hmmm. Well, you may have a point there.

      Of course, I never really have paid much attention to the bonus. I don't particularly use it -- it's just there, and I don't bother to turn it off anymore than I worked to get it.

      Maybe somebody should lobby for a reversal of the default, a checkbox to use the bonus rather than a checkbox to disable it.

      For this post, at any rate, I'll turn it off, although I suppose that might mean that you'll never see it. Sigh.

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

  8. The name by e8johan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why don't they name materials better today? What is interesting in the name "Super-black"? Nothing!

    I suggest we call it Darkonium or something...

    1. Re:The name by cHALiTO · · Score: 5, Funny

      Darkenite!

      we could even go around saying it affects superheroes or something.

      --
      "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
    2. Re:The name by igaborf · · Score: 1
      I suggest we call it Darkonium or something...

      I prefer Blacula.

    3. Re:The name by sh00z · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Why don't they name materials better today?
      Gene Wolfe coined a better word circa 1980. It's fuligin . (Just search on 'blacker than black')
    4. Re:The name by WeirdKid · · Score: 1

      Dolomite!

    5. Re:The name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Gene Wolfe didn't coin it: Its from heraldry, and from latin terms for coal.

      The opposite term is "argent"

    6. Re:The name by sp1nl0ck · · Score: 4, Funny

      The fashion industry will probably announce that "superblack is the new black". Which manages to sound faintly ridiculous and be true at the same time.

      --
      War is God's way of teaching Americans geography
    7. Re:The name by rpi1995 · · Score: 1

      I've got to go with Darkonite.

      And I predict that this will not have it's primary use in astonomical instruments.

      It'll only be a matter of time before we read of tech millionares with Darkonite coated walls in their home theater systems.

    8. Re:The name by scotay · · Score: 1

      How about Shaftnium?

      Old Dirtium?

    9. Re:The name by sh00z · · Score: 1

      I knew that the word already existed. All of the exotic terms in the Book of the New Sun are in the OED. What is significant here is that even if it originally came from 'coal' (I've read 'soot,') Gene Wolfe coined the usage of the word as meaning 'blacker than black.'

    10. Re:The name by edbarrett · · Score: 1

      Hotblack.

    11. Re:The name by dazed-n-confused · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fuligin.

      (cf. Gene Wolfe's "Shadow of the Torturer" for details).

    12. Re:The name by zymurgy_cat · · Score: 1

      How about Compuglobalhypermegablack?

      --
      -- Fugacity: Confusing chemists since 1908
    13. Re:The name by Shads · · Score: 1

      Nah, as with all current naming standards, it can't be worth anything unless it is prefixed with an e...

      Thus we have eBlack!

      --
      Shadus
    14. Re:The name by gosand · · Score: 1
      Why don't they name materials better today? What is interesting in the name "Super-black"? Nothing!

      Yeah, they should name it Superfly.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    15. Re:The name by ciscoeng · · Score: 1


      Ah, man, I feel the Shaft song coming on!

    16. Re:The name by The-Perl-CD-Bookshel · · Score: 1

      iBLACK, black.NET, eBLACK, and my fav. Black#

      --
      I don't keep a lid on my coffee so when I walk around I look busy -me
    17. Re:The name by kamskii · · Score: 1

      I vote to call it "asshole".

    18. Re:The name by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Too late, Microsoft have bought the patent and named it Black.Net

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    19. Re:The name by BenV666 · · Score: 1
      we could even go around saying it affects superheroes or something.
      Of course it does, it'll make them nearly blind as they'll have great difficulty seeing through this stuff ;-)
    20. Re:The name by HedRat · · Score: 1

      BeoWolf Blackster.

    21. Re:The name by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Blaxploitium

  9. How much more black could it be? by gibber · · Score: 5, Funny

    None.

    None more black.

    1. Re:How much more black could it be? by swordboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      In the Beginning, there was Nothing. And then God said, let there be light.

      And there was still nothing. But - hell - you could SEE it!

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    2. Re:How much more black could it be? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      How much more black could it be?

      :-)

      I think the term originally comes from Television, where you can get Blacker than Black, as the actual signal level for black is higer than the absolute lowest value. Ever done the calibration where you have to lower/raise the brighness so that a black areas is the same colour as the background? There is a test image and a description of the process here.

      Highly recommended if you like things to be "just right" ;-) Most folk have their TV set very wrongly and don't realise it, usually because they have the settings up in the shop to make it stand out from the other ones.

      If you are interested in this sort of thing, and have a home cinema set up, I highly recommend the Video Essentials DVD, which explains everything about setting your system up to be perfect. No, I don't work for them!

    3. Re:How much more black could it be? by jhines0042 · · Score: 1

      None.

      None more black.


      Its like a black mirror.

      Oh wait....

      --
      42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
    4. Re:How much more black could it be? by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 1

      And when you're shopping for a TV, make sure to turn the set off and look at the screen, 'cause that's as black as you'll ever see on that set.

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    5. Re:How much more black could it be? by Kuad · · Score: 2, Funny

      "It's the weird colour scheme that freaks me. Every time I try to operate one of these weird black controls, labelled in black on a black background, a little black light lights up black to let me know I've done it. What is this, some kind of galactic hyper-hearse?"

    6. Re:How much more black could it be? by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      One day- I am gonna build that baby... could it be that my wierd dream involving massive trucks folding out into huge speaker cabs last night was pre-emptive- if just of this discussion?.... Man we were talking there was an amp the size of a large shipping container....

      Hehe....No sign of spinal tap though...

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
    7. Re:How much more black could it be? by Quixadhal · · Score: 1

      Solid.

      "You mess with the fro, you got to go!"

  10. Whaaat? No Spinal Tap quotes yet? by coug_ · · Score: 1, Funny

    "It's like, how much more black could this be? and the answer is none. None more black."

    1. Re:Whaaat? No Spinal Tap quotes yet? by Eccles · · Score: 1

      "It's like, how much more black could this be? and the answer is none. None more black."

      "There's a fine line between clever and stupid."

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  11. Spinal Tap's next album by micromoog · · Score: 5, Funny

    NIGEL: I think he's right, there is something about this, that's that's so black, it's like; "How much more black could this be?" and the answer is: "None, none... more black."

    1. Re:Spinal Tap's next album by CHUD-Wretch · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mod this up to 11!!

      --
      "Suburbia is where the developer bulldozes out the trees, then names the streets after them."
    2. Re:Spinal Tap's next album by coug_ · · Score: 1

      Ah-ha! Beat ya by one post! See? :)

    3. Re:Spinal Tap's next album by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why not Mod this up to 5 and make 5 harder to get to?

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:Spinal Tap's next album by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      But ... but this comment deserves 11.

    5. Re:Spinal Tap's next album by jackstack · · Score: 1
      Spinal Tap LIVES!!! Did anyone else catch the name of the head scientist working on it??!?!?! His name is *Nigel*!!

      "That's not real is it? They can't say that!" - Nigel Tufnel when asked for response to two-word review of album, "Shark Sandwich" which was simply: "Shit Sandwich"

    6. Re:Spinal Tap's next album by micromoog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh man, that makes it so much funnier. "After lower-than-expected album sales, Nigel spent the next 17 years perfecting the color black . . ."

  12. Camera coating by winchester · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't mind coating the interior of my Hasselblad with that :)

    1. Re:Camera coating by danaross · · Score: 1

      I had a lense flare problem with an older 250mm Hasselblad lense. I solved it by putting some black paper in the lense but this material would be great.

  13. Sandpapered by Big+Mark · · Score: 4, Funny
    "The key to the nickel and phosphorous coating's blackness is that its surface is pitted with microscopic craters"
    Not much different from going over it with the world's finest-grain sandpaper, then. And...
    From the article:
    "When you look at the black, it is an incredibly beautiful surface. It's like black velvet."
    Ah, so that's why they made it. The physicists are secret cross-dressers, after the finest frocks known to man!

    -Mark
    1. Re:Sandpapered by SensitiveMale · · Score: 1

      "When you look at the black, it is an incredibly beautiful surface. It's like black velvet."

      Great. Now all the flea markets are gonna be stocked with Elvis paintings on this!

    2. Re:Sandpapered by SensitiveMale · · Score: 1

      Elvis wasn't black.

      Really? You sure? Every picture I have ever seen of Elvis was of a black man with a large afro.

      Of course he wasn't black. But you have never seen any of the millions of Elvis paintings on black velvet?

    3. Re:Sandpapered by Newander · · Score: 1
      Naw, they just want to paint pictures of Elvis on it.

      I'm betting they'll paint Jesus instead.

      --

      Jesus saves and takes half damage.

  14. fuligin? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Informative


    OK, now we know what fuligin is made of.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  15. This is good news... by DarkDust · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...for us gothics ! Where can I buy clothes and make-up with this material ?

    1. Re:This is good news... by xianzombie · · Score: 1

      that reminds me...i need new clothes :p

      my black shirts just aren't as black as they used to be...

    2. Re:This is good news... by wheany · · Score: 1, Funny

      I heard this is going to be the new black.

    3. Re:This is good news... by grimarr · · Score: 1
      This innovation answers a question that has been on my mind for a while: what will be the next fancy credit card color?


      We had silver, then gold cards. Then Platinum cards. Then Titanium came around. I have been wondering -- what's next? Uranium Visa? Magnesium Mastercard? (I like the sound of that, actually) Now, we have it. American Express Blackbody card.

    4. Re:This is good news... by Hey_bob · · Score: 1

      I saw a shirt at a club that said "I'm only wearing black until they come up with something darker."

      here ya go.

    5. Re:This is good news... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Just so you know Amex currently has a black card, its called something like the Centurian Card, comes with a whole host of nifty features, and requires that you spend something like $100,000 a month on your current account to be considered for it. The only person I have know of who has one is Larry Ellison.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  16. Nifty. I wonder how long... by idontgno · · Score: 4, Funny
    before the substance and its application process trickle down to amateur telescopy?

    Nigel Fox, who heads the optics group at NPL, said: "When you look at the black, it is an incredibly beautiful surface. It's like black velvet."

    Who'll be the first schmuck to paint Jesus or Elvis onto this surface?

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    1. Re:Nifty. I wonder how long... by wkitchen · · Score: 1
      Who'll be the first schmuck to paint Jesus or Elvis onto this surface?
      Forget that. I want one with dogs playing poker.
  17. Absorb or absorb not, there is no reflect by nusuth · · Score: 5, Informative

    The light that is neither transmitted nor reflected is absorbed. If it is totally opaque too it has to be also a good solar heating surface. That said, one might be a very good absorber at particular wavelengths, but transparent or reflective at others. The cavities should act as a blackbody and operate at a wide range of frequencies though.

    --

    Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!

  18. Is it Frictionless Though? by ninthwave · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is this a material that Ford and Zaphod will marvel at as they cruise space parks looking for a ship to steal and will Marvin be riding a ship made of one into the sun.

    Rest In Peace Mr. Adams

    --
    I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said: "I drank what?" - Chris Knight (Val Kilmer)- Real Genius
    1. Re:Is it Frictionless Though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Its so black light just falls into it!"

  19. I've got a Mr Desiato on the line... by ratbag · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hotblack wants to upgrade his spaceship with some new buttons.

    Rob.

  20. And in other news... by jaxon6 · · Score: 1

    Trent Lott is quoted as apologizing to this new material.

    --
    Do you see the sig? Do you have it in your sights? Why yes, Miss Moneypenny...
  21. New? but I saw 2001: A Space Odyssey ... by Radioheadhead · · Score: 3, Funny

    so I know this material has been here on earth since the "Dawn of Man."

    1. Re:New? but I saw 2001: A Space Odyssey ... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1, Funny

      That comment made me want to hit you over the head with a bone. Or maybe it's that annoying screeching sound. I think it's coming from my mother board. Damn capacitors.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:New? but I saw 2001: A Space Odyssey ... by Newander · · Score: 1

      Except that the monolith is described as being perfectly smooth. This stuff has all those itty bitty craters.

      --

      Jesus saves and takes half damage.

  22. amature astronomy by Njerd · · Score: 5, Informative

    I would love to see this used to coat the vanes that support the secondary mirrors of reflector type telescopes. Diffraction spikes (the little spikes on relatively bright stars) are really the reflection of light on these little supports. If you are into photographing nebulae, having a bright star in view can be a real photo killer.

    1. Re:amature astronomy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Diffraction spikes are caused by just that, diffraction, not reflections - you'd have the same diffraction spikes whether the vanes were chromed or 100% absorbent. If it were actually simple reflection, you'd only have three spikes on stars seen through a reflector with a 3-vane secondary, instead of the six spikes that you'll actually see. Also, you'd still have visual artifacts with curved vanes. Curved vanes only reduce the contrast slightly, and don't otherwise visibly affect the image to any great degree.

    2. Re:amature astronomy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      No, diffraction spikes are just what they are named: diffraction spikes. Diffraction is not reflection, and an ultra-black surface can still diffract.

  23. black velvet by Keith_Beef · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the lame Ananova article:

    It's like black velvet

    I thought that black velvet was 60% Guinness and 40% Champagne...

    1. Re:black velvet by Keith_Beef · · Score: 1

      My guinness recipe poster had that one down as a snakebite.

  24. We can finally get the Heart of Gold affect by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2, Funny
    Think of it Linux geeks. A car that's so black, you can't tell how close you are standing to it. Inside all of the controls will be black on a darker shade of black.

    Might make a cool screen too.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    1. Re:We can finally get the Heart of Gold affect by CuriousKangaroo · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that Hotblack Desiato's stuntship and not the Heart of Gold?

  25. Why don't they by Omkar · · Score: 1

    Just turn out the lights, drink a few dozen beers, or even just close their eyes?

  26. Martin Black by mikeselectricstuff · · Score: 5, Informative

    The book 'The Hubble Wars' mentions a coating called 'Martin Black' developed by Lockheed-Martin for use in spy satellites - I wonder how this stuff compares. I found some info Here : The 'Martin Black' is not a paint at all, but a specially etched aluminum surface that acts like an anechoic chamber on a microscopic scale. The surface looks like an array of very steep pyramids a few wavelengths of light apart. It's extremely fragile & expensive to produce, but was never a classified process. Mostly used in aerospace optical hardware such as star trackers & imaging systems that have to work in direct sunlight. Ball Aerospace has a version of this process. It's considered to be a 'proprietary' process, ie they won't tell you how it's done for commercial reasons.

    1. Re:Martin Black by pdqlamb · · Score: 1

      There wasn't anything in the article that really sounded that impressive. Martin Black (and Ball Black, and a goodly number of other light baffle coatings) have been below 1% reflectance for decades, from 0 to 180 degree angle of incidence and exitance. Look carefully at the claim -- "at some angles." OK, the distribution functions aren't flat -- but it sounds like they snookered the reporter into writing an article about the best point on the curve.

  27. Aaaiiiiih Got by curtisk · · Score: 1

    light absorbtion prop-PER-ties!

    An' I'm Supa-Black! UNGH!

    Hawt! :)

    ala SuperBad

    --

    Sehr geehrter Toilettenbenutzer!

  28. RGB (-1;-1;-1) by borgdows · · Score: 1

    Can we have a picture of this color please?

  29. Potential military applications by Surlyboi · · Score: 1

    As others have said here, the possibility of
    this stuff being used in espionage and the like
    are tremendous. Depending on the applicability,
    all kinds of stealth stuff could come out of this.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine...
  30. A Tad more detail by dmontreuil · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's a little more detail and a few pictures at http://www.npl.co.uk/optical_radiation/superblack. html

    --
    no llamas were harmed in the making of this sig
    1. Re:A Tad more detail by dmontreuil · · Score: 1

      Corrected URL is
      http://www.npl.co.uk/optical_radiation/superblac k.html

      --
      no llamas were harmed in the making of this sig
    2. Re:A Tad more detail by JPelorat · · Score: 1
      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
  31. ...also, it's already black enough by danro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well... in physics, the sun is often used as an example of a "black body", so one may even say it's black enough as it is ;-)

    --

    "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
    1. Re:...also, it's already black enough by grahamlee · · Score: 2, Informative

      Is it? I was under the impression that the chromosphere kindof messed that up a little. Oh, and the Sun isn't in thermal equilibrium with anything. Actually, I suppose its own gravitational energy counts (over sufficiently short timescales)...executive decision? OTOH phenomena such as sunspots and other surface effects remove any homogeneity from the radiation, and don't forget the solar neutrino emission which is unlikely to be in thermal equilibrium.

      Typically, black bodies are approximated by hollow ceramic ovens with a gold lining. The oven has a small hole in the side and is heated to the melting point of gold Thus you know exactly the temperature of the sides of the oven, you make the hole small enough that effusion doesn't upset the thermal equilibrium, et voila you have a blackbody standard.

    2. Re:...also, it's already black enough by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 1
      Is it? I was under the impression that the chromosphere kindof messed that up a little. Oh, and the Sun isn't in thermal equilibrium with anything.

      While it's not in thermal equilibrium, the spectrum is very close to a black body, especially at wavelengths longer than visible.

      --
      It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
    3. Re:...also, it's already black enough by grahamlee · · Score: 1

      If you're going to be pointing things into space and measuring long wavelength energy distributions, there's a much better black body we call the Universe. I talk of course of the 2.7K cosmic uWave background radiation (the stuff that makes your TV go "SHHHH" when it's not tuned it properly).

    4. Re:...also, it's already black enough by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 1

      2.7K, 5800K, what's a few thousand degrees between friends?

      --
      It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
    5. Re:...also, it's already black enough by grahamlee · · Score: 1

      Mainly accuracy. As aney fule no </molesworth>, the approximation that solar radiation==BB radiation is flawed dut to the absorption spectrum of the chromosphere. Not too much of a problem in the IR, because the stuff's hot enough to be monatomic so you don't get rotation or vib-rot absorption. But it still isn't perfect.

      OTOH, I've seen spectra fitting the CMB radiation to BB radiation where the error bars have to be 400 sigma before you can even see them. That's damned accurate. :-)

  32. Future work by Wrexen · · Score: 4, Funny

    Scientists estimate this will be the blackest material ever manufactured, until they perfect the technique of mass-producing Hillary Rosen's soul.

    1. Re:Future work by moncyb · · Score: 1

      You fool! Hillary Rosen doesn't have a soul! (looks around) Oh my God! Run before she envelops us all! Aaaaaaaaa.....

    2. Re:Future work by peter · · Score: 1

      She doesn't want it to be copied.

      --
      #define X(x,y) x##y
      Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(peter@cordes , .ca)
  33. Mom! Dad! by Degobah · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't Touch It! It's Evil!

  34. Why in certain angles? by gmuslera · · Score: 1
    With the light source at right angles, the coating reflects less than 0.35%. Black paint reflects about 2.5% - seven times more.

    This kind of things could decrease utility, or make possible uses more difficult?

    1. Re:Why in certain angles? by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 1
      "Why in certain angles?"

      My half-assed guess is that it's a property of the craters. At the proper angles, the light that doesn't get immediately absorbed is reflected to another part of the same surface. So instead of reflecting x% of the light hitting the surface, it reflects x% of x%.

  35. There are going to be some happy goths! by RHIC · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, now all those people wearing t-shirts saying "I'm only wearing black until they invent something darker" will be very happy! Any idea as to when we'll be able to get it in t-shirt form?

    1. Re:There are going to be some happy goths! by shfted! · · Score: 1

      I'm rather gothish, and the first thing i thought of was if it could be made into material... lol.

      --
      He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
    2. Re:There are going to be some happy goths! by BenV666 · · Score: 1

      And then print on it "I'm only wearing super-black until they invent something darker" ? ;-)

    3. Re:There are going to be some happy goths! by Change · · Score: 1

      Happy? What are you talking about? I'm going to have to replace my *entire* wardrobe!
      Must find second job to finance darker clothing... ;)

  36. Well... by caveat · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...this is a Good Thing for production instruments, but it won't matter much for research/labwork/prototypes; right now I'm working on laser detection of single atmospheric particles; we needed a *black* coating for the inside of the chamber, but it didn't need to be particularly robust, just dark - so we smoked it with a flame. Carbon black is the least reflective substance known, IIRC it absorbs something like 99.996% of incident radiation...anybody who's seen the inside of an old kerosene lamp chimney knows exactly what they mean in the article when they talk about the 'black velvet' appearance. We did have some problems with it 'popcorning' as we pumped the chamber down, but a staged evacuation with good degassing periods took care of that.

    Oh, this would make a great solar heating material - somebody mentioned the specific heat of the material, but as long as you have a thin layer backed by a heatsink, the specific heat doesn't matter (it's just the amount of heat a material can contain per gram; if you have just just a tiny bit of black substance, it doesn't matter how much heat it stores); it's all about the absorbtion.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:Well... by GT_Alias · · Score: 2, Funny
      We did have some problems with it 'popcorning' as we pumped the chamber down, but a staged evacuation with good degassing periods took care of that

      Oh man...the potential. Too bad I don't have a sense of humor.

  37. "Wonder how effective it would be . . . by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    as a solar heating surface ?"

    Ummmmm, much more than black paint?

    I don't mean to be snide or anything ( for a change), but you really couldn't figure that out for yourself in about 1/10 of a second?

    Not that it'll make much difference in a world that still puts black asphalt products on their roofs (which does everything wrong, being hot in summer and cold in winter) instead of polished aluminum.

    In order to make good use of solar radiation one must first learn to use it *properly,* no matter how efficient any particular material is. Otherwise that efficiency just goes to waste.

    I recommend a perusal of Rex Robert's classic work "Your Engineered House" for an explaination of how understanding basic thermodynamics can be applied simply and cheaply, with off the the shelf non-propriatary building materials, to a house with remarkable effect.

    Just as in software no one makes gobs of money promoting nonpropriatary solutions, even though those solutions may not only be cheaper, but *better.* The whole Open/Propriatary thingummy goes far deeper than the IT industry. It is pervasive in every walk of life.

    It's up to you to ignore the advertising material and edumicate yourself I'm afraid.

    KFG

  38. "black velvet" by extra88 · · Score: 1

    Nigel Fox, who heads the optics group at NPL, said: "When you look at the black, it is an incredibly beautiful surface. It's like black velvet."

    This could breathe new life into paintings of Elvis, Jesus, and weeping clowns. It could take the art world by storm!

  39. crap! by danro · · Score: 1, Funny

    Someone start a line of cybergoth clothing! This could be huge!
    "My black is blacker than your black"


    And just an hour ago I bought a new pair of black military pants.
    Is buying clothes going to be like buying a graphics card from now on, ie two minutes after you buy it the new model comes along to blow it straight out of the water.
    Aw crap!

    --

    "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
  40. Artists + something like black velvet = by T5 · · Score: 1

    a whole slew of new and improved Elvis paintings.

  41. Mirror by Andy_R · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pictures are mirrored here: dev/null

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    1. Re:Mirror by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 1

      I thought they were mirrored at /dev/zero...

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    2. Re:Mirror by Dr.+Photo · · Score: 1
      Shhh... don't tell them about that one...

      /dev/null has already been Slashdotted -- all I'm getting is EOF...

      :P

  42. Re:Unwanted shoes by hplasm · · Score: 1, Informative

    Don't use your own shoes..

    --
    ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  43. No need to invent it, we already have it by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 1

    It's the colour of all Lawyers hearts.

  44. Douglas Adams by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 1

    came up with the idea of a space-ship coated with a material like this in the Hitch-Hikers Guide to the Galaxy!

  45. Of course you can. by terrencefw · · Score: 1, Funny

    Here is the worlds first picture of this new substance.

    --
    Like tinyurl, but one letter less! http://qurl.co.uk/
    1. Re:Of course you can. by op51n · · Score: 1

      Wow, looks like someone set hex value of #000000!

  46. Materials Science by JumpingBull · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This will prove to be useful, for two reasons:

    First, it is a better absorber then what we have now, which, as someone pointed out, would make an incremental improvement for things such as solar collectors.

    Second, it may find some powerful uses as a black body emitter, which would have some applications for cooling. Specifically, there is a window in the atmosphere where energy can leave the atmosphere ( around one of the IR ammonia lines, IIRC) this may alleviate the greenhouse effect ... maybe ...

    As one of my Professors used to say "Progress is measured by progress in Materials Science". He might have been biased, however...

    I would be very interested to find out the wavelengths where this is effective.

    There are three types of reflectance that I am aware of: mirrors; diffuse reflectors (lambertian surfaces) and a special case of reflectance as found on a dusty surface, such as the moon( which is an aggragation of spherical lambertian surfaces, with special properties). Anyone else know of any others?

    --
    This is progress?
    1. Re:Materials Science by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      don't forget Frauhoffer scattering. Richard Feynman in his book QED the Strange Theory of Light and Matter describes it, it is the cause of the prismatic effect you see when looking at a CD. See also http://www.physics.yorku.ca/undergrad_programme/hi ghsch/Feynm2.html

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
  47. Shoot... but sign me up by ianscot · · Score: 1
    So what's the cost going to be like, and how's the weight? Googling, a couple of articles specifically say it's for the space industry. Must be a cost thing? What's to keep this out of my next Swarovski spotting scope?

    (Not that the return for cost will be there in consumer optics, but that never stopped those of us with $1000 phase coated, nitrogen purged roof prism binoculars before... We're too easy.)

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  48. Dark Source for Dark Suckers by pyrrhos · · Score: 1

    I think this "Dark" emmiting material is exactly what is missing to make the famous Dark Succker Theory complete

  49. next release even blacker by axxackall · · Score: 1
    The key to the nickel and phosphorous coating's blackness is that its surface is pitted with microscopic craters.

    Pitting the surface with microscopic black holes will make it even blacker.

    Besides, it will absorb everything (including matter, not only energy!) very well - good for cleaning industry.

    two thing to solve before: how to make microscopic black holes (perhaps in a process of cold fusion?) and how to keep them together (perhaps with dark matter?).

    Wait a minute, what is the color of dark matter? Is it black or it's grey a bit?

    --

    Less is more !
  50. New control panels by o1d5ch001 · · Score: 1

    Sounds perfect for that ufo control panel. Black control panel with the black buttons...

    --
    Q. What is Calvin's monster snowman called? A. The Torment Of Existence Weighed Against The Horror of Non Being
  51. Spinal Tap's again by phrantic · · Score: 1

    On a scale of black this goes up to 11 right?

    --
    --My sig is bigger than your sig--
  52. Obligatory Link by havardi · · Score: 1
  53. Solar heating by Paul+Johnson · · Score: 2, Informative
    This will be (almost) no better for absorbing heat than conventional matt black.

    Say conventional black paint reflects 1% of the radiation. This stuff reflects, say, 0.1%. If you are building optical instruments then that is a 90% decrease in ambient reflections from internal surfaces, which is really useful.

    But if you are interested in harvesting energy then the absorbancy has gone up from 99% to 99.9%, which is an increase of just 0.9% over what we had before. Gee.

    Paul.

    --
    You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
    1. Re:Solar heating by jim3e8 · · Score: 1

      But you can flip those numbers around and say we've achieved a 90% decrease in unharvested energy, and only a 0.9% increase in unreflected light for the optical instruments. It's the exact same thing, but seems to be the opposite of what you said. Numbers can be made to lie very easily.

  54. I'll buy it.... by Zobeid · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they can make it into some kind of paint that's reasonably easy to apply (i.e. without baking, toxic solvents, etc.)? I would love to repaint the inside of my telescope with it. Even if it comes in sheets, it would be great as flocking material. A lot of telescope builders will go nuts over this stuff.

  55. Omni Magazine by dbullock · · Score: 1

    I could have sworn I read about this in the 80's in Omni Magazine.

    --
    http://www.bullnet.com
  56. Cool Case Mod. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    That would make a cool case mod. A really black PC that looks more like a hole with a glowing blue led in the center. With it being so black you cant makeout its actuall shape.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Cool Case Mod. by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but running an overcloxored processor so fast that the refrigeration unit makes the floor studs in the room it's in shake....

      My brother-in-law has one of those machines that sound like a rocket engine. He's proud he didn't buy Intel, cuz he's sockin' it to The Man. Damn it's noisy.

      Is it true that black faceplate peripherals are the profit center that serves as equivalent to the deluxe stock in-dash radio at the car dealership? My friend's Delta 88 had the deluxe 8-Track player in it, years back....

  57. The name of it? by Alorelith · · Score: 1

    Are they going to call it fuligan?

  58. Ah... the possibilities by Lurch+Kimded · · Score: 1

    Think about it, the goths could at last be happy (if that is possible), they can wear uber-black clothing! I know I would want some of it. ;-)

    --

    How can you say that civilisation's do not advance... in every war we invent new ways to kill you.

  59. short on details by syle · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Why are all the articles I see on Ananova so short on details? They amount to 'Someone told us that XXX exists!! Cool!'

    Here is another example.

    --

    /syle

  60. reminds me of that black stunt ship by option8 · · Score: 4, Funny
    i hope douglas will excuse this:


    . . .

    Zaphod's attention however was elsewhere. His attention was riveted on the ship standing next to Hotblack Desiato's limo. His mouths hung open.

    "That," he said, "that ... is really bad for the eyes ..." Ford looked. He too stood astonished.

    It was a ship of classic, simple design, like a flattened salmon, twenty yards long, very clean, very sleek. There was just one remarkable thing about it.

    "It's so ... black!" said Ford Prefect, "you can hardly make out its shape ... light just seems to fall into it!"

    Zaphod said nothing. He had simply fallen in love.

    The blackness of it was so extreme that it was almost impossible to tell how close you were standing to it.

    "Your eyes just slide off it ..." said Ford in wonder. It was an emotional moment. He bit his lip.

    Zaphod moved forward to it, slowly, like a man possessed - or more accurately like a man who wanted to possess. His hand reached out to stroke it. His hand stopped. His hand reached out to stroke it again. His hand stopped again.

    "Come and feel the surface," he said in a hushed voice.

    Ford put his hand out to feel it. His hand stopped.

    "You ... you can't ..." he said.

    "See?" said Zaphod, "it's just totally frictionless. This must be one mother of a mover ..."

    He turned to look at Ford seriously. At least, one of his heads did - the other stayed gazing in awe at the ship.

    "What do you reckon, Ford?" he said.

    "You mean ... er ..." Ford looked over his shoulder. "You mean stroll off with it? You think we should?"

    "No."

    "Nor do I."

    "But we're going to, aren't we?"

    "How can we not?"

    . . .


    offtopic, yes, but somewhat more in the vein of discussion, how does it do on reflecting, say, radar?
    1. Re:reminds me of that black stunt ship by bytor4232 · · Score: 1

      My kingdom for mod points :(

      --
      -- 4 8 15 16 23 42
  61. Military uses surely more likely by fantomas · · Score: 1

    I reckon positive environmental projects like solar heating for developing countries won't get a look in.

    If it really is a useful low-reflecting material, the Official Secrets people will slap a secrecy and Military Secret stylee order on the whole lot and the only time we'll see the stuff (pun intended :-) ) is on UK military equipment. Oh, and US military as well, seeing as Tony is trying his damndest to make us the 51st State these days....

  62. Super reflective? by sdukaric · · Score: 1

    What if this material (with that kind of surface structure) would be made of completely transparent material like pure clean glass/plastic?
    Combined with some kind of color absorbers (if that kind of thing exists at all) it could provide some interesting effects.
    Would it be something like chameleon suite? For egg. if someone in this suite stands beetween bushes it should become one with the bushes itself:-> Just a thought, blame me, flame me :-))))

    --
    Sinisa
  63. In Other News... by prgammans · · Score: 1

    It has been comfermed by an unnamed working of the National Physical Laboratory at Disaster Area a universally renown musician has placed an order for a considerable quanty of super-black. Sources close to Disaster Area has so far not been able to lay light on the planned use for this material.

  64. now all we need to do... by mog · · Score: 1

    is make a space ship of it and start a really, really loud band!

    1. Re:now all we need to do... by Amroarer · · Score: 1

      If we're forming a Disaster Area cover band, I volunteer to play the Bass Detonator. That always struck me as a fun instrument to learn.

  65. there you go, getting my hopes up by ibbie · · Score: 1

    when i saw the title of this article, some small part of me had hoped they'd finally gotten around to inventing a darker beer.

    drat!

    --
    The wise follow a damned path, for to know is to be forsaken.
  66. Metallica by gregRowe · · Score: 2, Funny

    great, as soon as Lars Ulrich gets word of this they'll re-release their black album for more profits.

    --
    There\'s no place like ~
  67. Solar Power. by miffo.swe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The problem with solar power today isnt about efficiency since modern panels have about 70-80% efficiency in heating water. The incoming power is about 1000W per m2. A better absorber wouldnt make the panel that much more efficient.Chromium Oxide have an efficiency of about 92%. Much of the problems lie in how you transport the heat from the panel to the energy storage.Insulation of the panel is something that you have to take into consideration. Cost is also of utter importance since you often have a roof capable of housing more than 30 m2 of panels which in most houses is overkill. To generate water you typically would need about 5 m2 from mars to november.

    If this material can make the total cost smaller then its good but if it makes it more expensive it isnt of any use. Robustness and price is what we should look into and not efficiency. A cheap solar panel that lasts for as long as it have to be functional to return the investment is possible today.

    The main problem with solar power is that when you need the power most (night/winter) there arent much sun around. Solar Power can never be anything but a valuable complement to something else. All trials of storin the energy longer times have failed miserably so far.

    Im not just rambling here, i was a partner in a company manufacturing solar panels some years ago.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
    1. Re:Solar Power. by Tomster · · Score: 1
      To generate water you typically would need about 5 m2 from mars to november.

      My head hurts. Generate water? Converting distance-units to time-units? Maybe I need more coffee....

      -Thomas

    2. Re:Solar Power. by miffo.swe · · Score: 1

      I was refering to hot water from the taps. To generate heat you need more m2. 5m2 of solar panels will cover your need for tap water but not for your heating. Im sorry if my english is bad.

      --
      HTTP/1.1 400
    3. Re:Solar Power. by koreth · · Score: 1
      Speaking as someone who's at this very moment waiting for an installer to arrive at his house to put up solar panels... I can say that in some parts of the world you feel the need for power a lot more during the day/summer. Solar power is a great match if you're in a place where air conditioners are a must-have.

      The local electric utility is my storage battery -- my house will feed them power during the day while I'm at work and I'll get it back from them at night.

    4. Re:Solar Power. by bluesnowmonkey · · Score: 1

      To generate water you typically would need about 5 m2 from mars to november.

      WTF is this guy trying to say?

    5. Re:Solar Power. by SewersOfRivendell · · Score: 1
      I think we need a new rating in addition to 'Interesting,' like say 'Accurate'.

      You'd think someone who had manufactured solar panels (even some years ago) might have heard of storage batteries. Or selling excess generated electricity back to the power company (power companies in California are required by law to buy it).

    6. Re:Solar Power. by rabidcow · · Score: 1

      Solar Power can never be anything but a valuable complement to something else. All trials of storin the energy longer times have failed miserably so far.

      What is coal? Stored solar energy.
      What is oil? Stored solar energy.
      Wind? Solar energy.
      Hydroelectric dam? Solar.

      What does that leave us with, nuclear and tidal?

    7. Re:Solar Power. by MickLinux · · Score: 1

      You might consider getting flywheel electric storage. There are some companies that make very good flywheels out of composites. They can store a ton of energy, are fairly cheap, and don't suffer the same problems as batteries.

      The problem with flywheels is if they come apart. In the case of these, they sink the flywheels into the ground, so that if they do explode, nobody is hurt.

      But they may be a lot better than batteries.

      --
      Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    8. Re:Solar Power. by MickLinux · · Score: 1

      I was interested in that, in Virginia. There's one electric company, yada yada yada.

      Anyhow, I asked, how to go about it, since it was the law there, too. They said you don't.

      I asked what they meant by that. They said, well, we'll charge you more to tie into the system than we'll pay you for the electricity.

      That's it. They want their coal burning plants. They have their way to get around the law. The rest doesn't matter.

      It's not always as simple as it seems.

      --
      Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    9. Re:Solar Power. by miffo.swe · · Score: 1

      I assumed that we were talking about heating solar panels and not electrical ones. To have better absorbtion doesnt help making electricity out of sunlight.Ofcourse you can store electrical power but not as efficiently as you would want.

      Batteries is expensive and the price/performance ratio quickly makes the investment wasted (apart from the preserving of natural resources which most governments including USA seems to not giva a shit about).

      --
      HTTP/1.1 400
    10. Re:Solar Power. by miffo.swe · · Score: 1

      To transform solar energy into hot water in your boiler you would need solar panels of a size of five square meters to cover your needs to shower and bath and such from mars to november.

      The cost of said panels is so small out of the total cost of the system that higher efficiency wouldnt make the whole system cheaper or much better. You cant store hot water from the summer until the colder months so there is no gain in having more heat generated than you can use. There have been many people trying to store the heat in mountains and insulated tanks etc. but the cost have always been much bigger than the energy generated.

      I was unclear, sorry.

      --
      HTTP/1.1 400
  68. Hmm... by slipgun · · Score: 1

    One of the early applications might be on star-trackers

    Was I the only one who read this as star-trekkers the first time?

    --
    SpamNet - a spam blocker that really works
  69. Re:Hmm by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

    >What were you thinking when you wrote that title??

    I am guessing that he meant:
    "there is a new material and it darker than any previous material known to man on earth. It could revolutionise optical instruments because it reflects 10 to 20 times less light than the black paint currently used to reduce unwanted reflections"

    See since it is darker than any other black material, he said blacker than black because it is blacker than any other material known on earth. And because it is blacker than any known material material on earth he said blacker than black. Because the previously blackest known material was black! Therefore he said blacker than black. Get it?

    Forgive me if you were trying to be funny, both sides seem to be overly sensitive.

    Oh I can't wait to see the mods on this one.

  70. How Black Is It? by Greyfox · · Score: 5, Funny

    Blacker than the mood of a web master who just found out that his page was posted on slashdot.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  71. Freeoow! by EvilDrew · · Score: 1

    Zaphod Beebelbrox is going to be all over this stuff.

  72. the ENHANCED greenhouse effect *sigh* by CharlieO · · Score: 2, Informative

    this may alleviate the greenhouse effect ... maybe ...

    I'd rather hope not

    As my old Professor used to say "its the ENHANCED Greenhouse Effect thats the environmental problem, the normal Greenhouse Effect is what keeps us alive"

    If our Atmosphere didn't 'trap' a certain amount of the incident energy from the sun, and the Oceans didn't transport this around the surface then out little planet would resemble a snowball.

    This is what happens in an ice age when the Ocean/Atmosphere system flips into another metastable state and the large amount of ice and snow on the surface significantly changes the reflective properites of the planet and the whole system cools.

    First we need to understand how this delicate balance actually works before we try and fix it. One thing we are learning is that the Ocean/Atmosphere system is not the safe stable thing we assumed it was, but its very dynamic with a number of metastable states. It can and has switched between states on a geologically quick (5000 years) timescale without much provocation. The bad news is that sustaining life is easy in the current state, it gets much harder in some of the others.

    Like a pH buffered solution its quite possible that our environment can tolerate and compensate for all the stuff we chuck into it, and then suddenly flip to another state.

    Oh, and the increment improvement in absorbtion will do very little to help solar collectors - the problem with solar collectors is doing something useful with the heat once you've got it, not getting it in the first place. Find me a material thats twice as good as a thermocouple than current technology and we may be on to something...

  73. Back in Blacker than Black by Dugsmyname · · Score: 1

    Back in Blacker than Black

    AC/DC should really rename their Back in Black album now.

  74. Stupid non-scientist question... by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1

    OK. So this thing is blacker than Dick Cheney's heart, but I have a serious question. First, I know shit little about physics (but plenty about what-not, what? what?). So, can a super black material attract light just by being super black? I mean, if the light is not directly shined upon it, then does a super black material pull "indirect" light toward it? I await your answers/flames/non-sequiturs with baited breath.

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    1. Re:Stupid non-scientist question... by Ozan · · Score: 1

      So, can a super black material attract light just by being super black? I mean, if the light is not directly shined upon it, then does a super black material pull "indirect" light toward it?

      No. Currently nothing is known to attract light in any way.

      Not to mention black holes which bend the space-time into a singularity and thus catching light.

  75. Re:RADAR absorbing paint for cars doesn't work by Uninvited+Guest · · Score: 1

    It wouldn't work anyway. Your radiator and headlights reflect sufficient radar to get your speed. The light-absorbing qualities of the paint won't help either, since laser speed detectors use the reflection from your license plate. Covering the license plate with laser-light-absorbing plastic won't help you, either. However, there seems to be no restriction on laser-based jamming, if you want to go that route (pun intended).

    --
    Sometimes I worry that I'll develop Alzheimer's disease, but no one will notice.
  76. Zinc Cloride by hottoh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    HCl acting on Zinc plate can produce a very black surface. In about 1980 I experienced the chemical effect and read about it. The article I read had a microscopic view of its surface and it indeed had striking peaks and valleys.

    The intent was to use it in cameras in to enhance the already black shrouds fore of the camera lenses in space.

    It was very odd looking at something so black.

  77. Can't be any blacker ... by MalHavoc · · Score: 1

    ... than the inside of my wallet.

  78. UCLA got robbed... by Goose+Bump · · Score: 1

    I believe this was originally developed in a UCLA lab a few years ago. Rumor has it the LAPD was involved in a raid of the facility. When questioned the LAPD spokesperson would only say "it fit the description".

  79. obTapRef: by Asprin · · Score: 1


    The question is how much more black could it be? The answer is none... none... more black.

    --
    "Lawyers are for sucks."
    - Doug McKenzie
  80. You guys are all wrong... by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1

    This the stuff Hotblack Desiato's ship is made from in Restaurant at the End of the Universe.

    --
    Who did what now?
  81. I'm so goth... by Per+Wigren · · Score: 2, Funny
    This reminds me of the classic I'm so goth-list...

    I'm so goth my black is blacker than your black. I call it "black black."

    I'm so goth, I don't say "black," I say "blahhwwwkkk."

    I'm so goth I have actually seriously uttered the phrase, "the darkest dark of the dark darkness."

    My favourite one is a bit off topic but it has to be mentioned.. ;)

    I'm so goth that bats hang little plastic me's from their ceiling.

    --
    My other account has a 3-digit UID.
  82. turkeys. by DarkHelmet · · Score: 1
    I hope whoever is doing this doesn't go into genetic engineering.

    Imagine turkeys with white meat, dark meat, and SuperBlack.

    Oh wait, I left the oven on for too long.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  83. Where are the pictures? by MongooseCN · · Score: 1

    Why don't they take a picture and put it online so we can see how black it is?

  84. Re:Beware of the darkness!! by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2, Funny

    "As you would expect a100 year old house and to hear all
    kinds of footsteps upstairs"

    How come in America it only takes a house to be 100 years old to be very likely haunted, and in the UK you don't reach "probably haunted" levels until the house is about 300 or 400 years old?

    Do Stateside ghosts get bored of the Ethereal Plane faster and come looking for trouble?

    graspee

  85. Here's a picture of it by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:Here's a picture of it by skelf · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I remember back in the days when we thought #010101 was as good as it got, and then scientists gave us #000000 and it revolutionized our web pages.

    2. Re:Here's a picture of it by namespan · · Score: 1

      It must be the blackest black -- it doesn't seem to change at all when I turn down the brightness on my monitor!

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    3. Re:Here's a picture of it by Kopretinka · · Score: 2, Funny
      No, that's not dark enough, it's like, what, 0,0,0 RGB? You'd need -10,-12,-7 RGB to convey SuperBlack.

      Note that SuperBlack is a bit on the bluish-pinkish side.

      --
      Yesterday was the time to do it right. Are we having a REVOLUTION yet?
  86. Dark side matter by Tom7 · · Score: 1

    I've warned them before about tampering with "dark side matter." This is bad news.

  87. How much light does it reflect? by Dick+Click · · Score: 1

    I don't understand what the article means when they say " it reflects 10 to 20 times less light". What does "10 times less" mean? Is this the same as one tenth? Why don't they just say that?

    I'm not trolling here. I don't understand it.

  88. Urngh... by BJH · · Score: 1

    The material could also be used in works of art. NPL says several artists have shown an interest.

    Does anyone else remember a short horror story about an artist who painted a painting using a "blacker than black" paint, made IIRC from a stone (coal?), who was then absorbed by the painting?

  89. Pictures Please by stixman · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Come on, how are we supposed to know how black it is without some pictures??? Links, please.

    ;P

    --
    -
  90. NPL, National Physics Laboratory in London by CrazyJoel · · Score: 1

    pronounced "nipple"

    --

    Such is the infinite Grace of Popeye.
  91. Monolith by chopkins1 · · Score: 1

    This must be what the monolith in 2001: A Space Odyssey was made of.

    1. Re:Monolith by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      no, that was made from cheese.

  92. "Martin Black" has been available for years by mfago · · Score: 3, Informative

    Martin Marietta (now Lockheed Martin) has produced a proprietary "super black" coating for years now. I've seen it, and it is _very_ non-reflective. The coating mentioned in the article sounds similar.

    "Martin Black" is proprietary though, so if you want a part coated you have to send it to Lockheed.

  93. quibble by MisterSquid · · Score: 1

    You wrote: black asphalt products on their roofs (which does everything wrong, being hot in summer and cold in winter).

    If you're talking about the ability of black asphalt to absorb light and retransmit that as heat, then doesn't it stand to reason black is the best color for your roof during the winter season?

    Polished aluminum is a great way to reflect light but a terrible way to insulate.

    --
    blog
  94. HHGTTG by mosschops · · Score: 1

    We're missing the obvious one...

    "It's *so* black, light just falls into it."

  95. Not completely novel by Kazir · · Score: 1

    I recall back in the mid-eighties reading in Omni magazine about a super black material. At the time they called it "fulegan" or maybe "fulgum" (sp?). It also used the principle of light absorbing craters. Though I'm not sure how it stacks up against this newer material.

  96. History repeating? by sacrilicious · · Score: 1
    The key... is that its surface is pitted with microscopic craters.

    I am absolutely positive that between ten and twenty years ago I read about this exact mechanism being used to produce a new material that absorbed more light than anything previously known. Are the pits in this new material just better than the old pits, or have I noticed a glitch in the matrix?

    .

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  97. Re:Cloning? by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 1

    Hey, some racist modded me as troll. I love Chris Rock and this joke was perfectly appropriate given he is "Blacker than Black" - dumbass mods.

    --
    Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
  98. Re:RADAR absorbing paint for cars doesn't work by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 1
    You know, I've heard that there are applications for RADAR besides speed traps. Some people have even suggested that it could be useful with aircraft, perhaps even in the military.

    I don't recall seeing license plates on the B-2, but maybe it was a dealer plane. :)

    --

    This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

  99. best example... by Cappy+Red · · Score: 1

    Unless you're really obscure and happen to remember the cartoon where the short little inventor invented the portable hole(made in various sizes dripped out of an eyedropper).

    You may also know him as the inventor of dry water.

    Unfortunately, the prototype portable holes were stolen shortly after invention.

    *honk*

    --
    This is my sig. It's prescription, I swear. I need it for reading things... on the other side of things
  100. Squant! by Ratface · · Score: 1

    You need more than plain RGB to show this, you need to include the little known fourth color, Squant, as well!

    Squant description - though you may have to download the plugin to see it properly.

    --

    A little planning goes a long way...
  101. Re:Martin Black - could be much better by caveat · · Score: 1

    If you engineered the pyramids to the right angles and spacing, to a high enough degree of precision, you could have the scattered light interfere perfectly destructively, giving something very close to 100% absorption. It would probably be rather expensive to manufacture in bulk, and have to be kept *very* clean, but for any application where you need something that extreme to begin with, those shouldn't be insurmountable problems.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  102. To get it darker... by MickLinux · · Score: 3, Interesting

    To get it even darker, plate a bunch of razor blades with this material, and then stack them.

    My father used stacks of razor blades as a heat dump for lasers in his fusion research at University of Wisconsin.

    He showed with pencil and paper how the razor blades successively reflect the light into the gaps between the blades, without turning it around. Thus, they absorb all the light, and make a great blackbody.

    Just as an interesting note: This was back in the early 70's, at a time when cost-efficient fusion was only a decade away, and had been only a decade away for 20 years. As part of his defense, he was asked whether it would be practical any time soon. His answer was no. When asked why, he pointed out that the reaction that was giving them some success was the D-T reaction, and that Tritium was so rare that it would never be a practical fuel.

    That essentially did not earn the pleasure of others in the field, and kept him out of that field -- perhaps a blessing, since success might have doomed his life to failure.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    1. Re:To get it darker... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      My father used stacks of razor blades as a heat dump for lasers in his fusion research at University of Wisconsin. He showed with pencil and paper how the razor blades successively reflect the light into the gaps between the blades, without turning it around. Thus, they absorb all the light, and make a great blackbody.

      Can you explain what you mean by a stack, or give a link to a diagram showing this? I am interested in this process. Thanks!

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  103. Jack London, "The Shadow and the Flash" by dpbsmith · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's an amusing story by Jack ("Call of the Wild") London entitled "The Shadow and the Flash." It's one of about a dozen stories he wrote that would be categorized as science fiction had the genre existed then.

    Two competitive brothers both seek the secret of personal invisibility via divergent, and completely bogus methods. One of them finds some way to make his entire body perfectly transparent (!) in the belief the perfect transparency equals invisibility, and apparently gets his index of refraction close to unity but still has some dispersion, because although he is invisible, he produces telltale rainbow-colored flashes.

    The other one searches for a perfect black, in the even stranger belief that an object covered in perfect black reflects no light and is therefore invisible. According to the story, this works except that, of course, he casts a shadow--and when he's present, even when not casting a shadow his presence creates an ill-defined sense of darkness or gloom.

  104. Can we say CASE MOD! :) by RenHoek · · Score: 1

    Yet another way to make your computer look way cool! :) Black on the outside, neon lights on the inside..

  105. Solar Power by TheJesusCandle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The problem with solar power today isnt about efficiency since modern panels have about 70-80% efficiency in heating water. The incoming power is about 1000W per m2. A better absorber wouldnt make the panel that much more efficient.Chromium Oxide have an efficiency of about 92%. Much of the problems lie in how you transport the heat from the panel to the energy storage.Insulation of the panel is something that you have to take into consideration. Cost is also of utter importance since you often have a roof capable of housing more than 30 m2 of panels which in most houses is overkill. To generate water you typically would need about 5 m2 from mars to november.

    If this material can make the total cost smaller then its good but if it makes it more expensive it isnt of any use. Robustness and price is what we should look into and not efficiency. A cheap solar panel that lasts for as long as it have to be functional to return the investment is possible today.

    The main problem with solar power is that when you need the power most (night/winter) there arent much sun around. Solar Power can never be anything but a valuable complement to something else. All trials of storin the energy longer times have failed miserably so far.

    Im not just rambling here, i was a partner in a company manufacturing solar panels some years ago.

    Linux, because my mother says so!

    1. Re:Solar Power by modecx · · Score: 1

      I don't think that this technology would ever have much of anything to do with solar planels. This paint probably can't behave as a photovoltaic source in the least. It would probably be more useful as the foci point at a large solar plant such as this. If you could sqweek another 2. something percent from a facility that produces 10MW, you might be onto something. Of course, that depends on whether it's a. resilant at very high temperatures, and b. cost effective.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    2. Re:Solar Power by -=Izzy=- · · Score: 1

      Dupe submissions are bad enough... now we have dupe comments?

  106. Re:amateur astronomy by CaptainPhong · · Score: 1

    Google for "telescope buying faq" and search for the FAQs relating to the sci.astro.amateur.

    Astrophotography is the sport of masochists. Seriously, if you want to get started in amateur astronomy, don't try to squeeze astrophotography into your first setup unless you have a ton of money to blow. It's expensive and surprisingly difficult.

    The first and most important rule of buying a telescope is to NEVER, under any circumstances, buy a telescope from a department store. Never. Never ever. Never ever do that. Never buy a telescope that advertises 400x magnification or some other rediculous value. Also, never buy the telescopes you see advertised on the shopping channel. The guy on their makes complete and utter lies about the capability of the telescopes they sell.

    By far, the most important spec on a telescope is aperature. The bigger the aperature, the more light it gathers, and the more you can see. Also, because of the laws of physics, the maximum useful magnification of a telescope is limited by the aperature. Also, for most deep sky objects (nebulae, star clusters, galaxies), you use your lower magnification eyepieces.

    The best first telescope is often a pair of binoculars (7x50 or 10x50 are excellent). You'd be shocked what you can see with a pair of binoculars (many, if not the majority of the Messier objects are visible, and the four brightest moons of Jupiter are easily spotted). For an actually telescope, a Dobsonian (a newtownian reflector mounted on a low to the ground, very stable, easy to use azimuth mount) is a easy to use, inexpensive choice. You get the absolute most aperature for your buck (meaning you can see the most things, and see them sharply), and it won't cheat you out of actually learning the sky the way an automated computerized telescope can. I'm a big fan of Orion's XT series (I have an XT8 8" dobsonian myself).

    Be sure not to get a telescope that is too big. Yeah, you may have a bunch of cash to blow on a monster scope, but a scope bigger than 8" or so (or even that big) can be a huge pain, and time consuming to set up. If you don't feel like hauling the thing out, you won't use it. On some nights, I end up taking out my binoculars because conditions aren't really good enough to justify the workout.

    --
    ... "Give me a woman who loves beer and I will conquer the w
  107. I'm just waiting... by kavau · · Score: 1

    I'm just waiting for the day when they construct a spaceship out of this material... with black dials on black background in the cockpit, illuminated by black lights. And then they gonna set it on remote, and crash it into the sun...

  108. No home is unsalable. by kfg · · Score: 1

    It's just question of how long it takes, and what the ultimate selling price is.

    In any case if you build a Rex Roberts type engineered home you couldn't get a mortage in the first place and self contracted with capital you raised yourself, ultimately saving you tens, or even hundreds, of thousands of dollars off the *front* end of home ownership cost.

    Bear in mind that a house with a lower retail value also pays lower *property taxes.*

    Under the right circumstances owning an "unsalable" home is a positive boon. Perhaps even to the extent that it puts you in a position where you can't be forced to move for work.

    KFG

  109. Dark Matter by objekt · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
  110. Sweeet... by sjanes71 · · Score: 1

    I had a 386DX like 8 years and I hated the beige, so I painted it flat-black with some bronze-fleck-- NOW, if I could do it again... I'd paint all my computers this color in a heart-beat.

    The only good color for a computer is black, witness the IBM AS/400's and ThinkPads. Think about it, have you *EVER* seen a ThinkPad that wasn't black?

    Enough said. :)

  111. Anti-LASER bra, anybody? by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

    "it reflects 10 to 20 times less light than the black paint currently used to reduce unwanted reflections"

    The first thing I thought of when I read this was a car bra or car paint. Some background for the confused: laser, while not visible to the human eye, is still light. As such, the color of a material will affect how much laser light will be reflected. The darker a material, the less reflection/the more light absorbed. There are already stealth bras you can find. If this material is better, it will only be a matter of time...

    I wonder if the various local gov'ts are going to fight this material for this reason, like how they killed the spray-on, peel-off paint idea a while back. (Robbers would use it to change the description of the car after a crime)

    p.s. If you're interested in the quantum physics of light, ala why does it reflect or get absorbed, how do mirages and holograms work, etc., go grab QED by Feynman. Fantastic book. Fantastic author.

    1. Re:Anti-LASER bra, anybody? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Police generally aim at the license plate. It is illegal to fail to display a front license plate in most states.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  112. What do we call it? by soundofthemoon · · Score: 1

    Severian the Torturer calls the color of his cloak that is darker than black "fugilin".

    My physics professor called the mythical substance with the same electromagnetic absorbtion properties as open space "spacecloth". Physics nerds, is this a common term, or was my prof just using non-standard jargon?

  113. Re:Martin Black - could be much better by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

    Are you talking about zero-degradation energy storage as light? or light collector based weapons? Or something like that... I think you would need some serious nano-tech to get the precision needed. And for it to be useful- you would have to have something like a perfect 2 way mirror - otherwise you have no guarantee of your input light potential being able to overcome the existing backflow potential... Crazzzeee...

    --
    OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
  114. Re:Cloning? by smithmc · · Score: 1

    Has science finally managed to synthesize (sp?) Chris Rock?

    "You went to film school, dint'ya? I'll bet this really burns you up. Does your father know that you get a [n-word] his coffee?" Yup, that's Super-Black, all right.

    --
    Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  115. The real question is ... by Greedo · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... how long before /. reports that someone has a case mod made of this?

    --
    Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
  116. Like priest's socks? by a2800276 · · Score: 1

    Because if you look at regular socks, you'll notice that sometimes they're just really really really really really really really dark blue!

    Nobody will get the reference, but I'm content chuckling to myself...

  117. We skipped the light fandango ... by wdavies · · Score: 1

    Perhaps we could get Procol Harum out of retirement to write a song about it. They did so well with Whiter Paleness...

  118. Velvet Elvis by Dan667 · · Score: 1

    Think of the advancement this will mean to the Black Velvet Elvis Painting Industry

  119. Re:Stealth car and LIDAR.... by Xandar01 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually this "black paint" would probably help for those LIDAR guns the cops are using. Painting front and rear ends of your car along with a good laser detector should help reduce your chances of getting caught spe... um... going just a little bit to fast.

    In fact I remember reading an article in "Car and Driver" several years ago that did some testing with LIDAR guns and driving with you headlights on. IIRC driving with your high beams on would reduce the effectiveness of the LIDAR gun by a couple hundred feet. C-n-D even suggested installing high power off road lights with IR filters on them to even further reduce the effective range (giving you some time to slow down before the LIDAR is able to get a reading.)

    Of course it seems those damn reflective license plates screw the whole thing up.

    --
    Life moves pretty fast; if you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it. -FB
  120. none more black by buckaroo-b · · Score: 1

    how much more black could it be?..... the answer is none, none more black......

    --

    i have walked down train tracks, walked down train tracks, drunk at 3 a.m. it not magic, it's no great trick, w
  121. Re:If it's like black velvet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... then why didn't they just use black velvet instead?

    You've never had to apply for scientific funding have you?

  122. Must....build....monolith... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    For some reason I have a compulsion to build a 1 x 4 x 9 monolith and coat it with this stuff.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  123. What about nonblack, nonreflective surfaces? by Reziac · · Score: 1

    Like using the micropitting process for monitors? It would sure make my eyes happy if the nonreflective coating was *totally* nonreflective, rather than merely about 1/3rd as reflective as normal glass.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  124. Re:Politically incorrect by JimFromJersey · · Score: 1

    Why that answer is simple: upper middle class, suburban, white kids.

    --
    between the greater and lesser infinities sleep the dreams undreamt
  125. Oi! by Chocolate+Teapot · · Score: 1

    That image is copyrighted!

    --
    Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise. - William Shakespeare
  126. It's so black that you can't make out any features by Lordship · · Score: 1

    So let's paint a spaceship with it, have a very loud rock concert, and crash the ship into the sun.

  127. Smell the Glove by Buck+Naked · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is the same stuff used on the Spinaltap album. "How much more black can it be??? The answer is none. None more black"

    --
    WWJDFAKB - What would Jesus do for a Klondike Bar?
  128. Re:Martin Black - could be much better by Alsee · · Score: 1

    have the scattered light interfere perfectly destructively, giving something very close to 100% absorption

    That can only work on monochromatic light. Different wavelengths need different spacings to interefere like that.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  129. How to do it. by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    Okay, get a razor without any extra metal on the bottom. Set it flat on the desk, with the blade pointing to the left. [If you want to see one, try looking at the disposable razor blades]. Or by it from the American Razor Company, in Weyer's Cave VA.

    Now take another blade, and lay it flat on the first, also with the blade pointing to the left.

    Now put another on that. Keep stacking them like that, so that all the blades point to the left and are parallel. Now apply a drop of superglue to the bottom of the stack. Let it dry, and lift the stack up.

    On one side, you'll see a lot of razor blades edges. But the thickness of the edge of each razor blade will be extremely small, like 1% of the thickness of a single blade.

    ---=======IIIIIIIIIII Razor Blade 3
    ---=======IIIIIIIIIII 2
    (blade side) ---=======IIIIIIIIIII 1 (base side)

    Between the blades it will be completely black. Don't believe it? Go into a black room, and shine a penlight on it. You won't see the reflection. It absorbs ALL the light. Well, all except for where the very thin edge is.

    Now, this might seem to make a great solar panel, but if you touch it, expect ribbons where your fingers were... and rain will damage it, as will dust. But in space it might be okay.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  130. Figures don't lie, but liars figure. by Paul+Johnson · · Score: 1
    So what?

    If you are interested in extracting useful energy then its the total amount absorbed that is important.

    Learn to understand the numbers, and you can avoid learning an awful lot that ain't so.

    Paul.

    --
    You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
  131. Sorry... one correction by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    I don't think he used super glue back then. I'm not sure if they had it. I'd think he used solder, or just a frame to hold them all in place. And either solder or physical contact might be better than superglue, possibly, because it electrically joins the razor blades, which might affect the light absorption characteristics of the heat dump. [some EE can correct me on this, if I'm wrong].

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    1. Re:Sorry... one correction by cr0sh · · Score: 1

      Ok, so you mean single-edge blades, but without the metal "protecting" sleeve on the one side, right? Could this be done with double edged blades (which are much thinner - though it would be more dangerous)? I would think it could, then it would be a two sided stack. I can see where solder might be better if used as a heat dump (if you used some high-temp solder - or maybe even brazing the stack, though it would be more difficult). Interesting...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  132. Re:Martin Black - could be much better by Zaak · · Score: 1

    That can only work on monochromatic light. Different wavelengths need different spacings to interefere like that.

    Is is theoretically possible to make a holographic pattern that would absorb like that at all wavelengths? Or even multiple wavelengths?

    TTFN

  133. How I'd make Martin Black by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    Okay, first I'd take aluminum plate. I'd evaporate or plate onto its surface a reasonably thick layer of tungsten.

    Tungsten, if I remember from articles about electron-tunnelling microscopes, has the property that when you expose it to NaOH [and sorry, I could have details wrong here], it dissolves most quickly where the curvature is smallest. So you can get things down to on the order of 1-atom points.

    Now, I'd coat the whole thing with photoresist, and--if necessary, using the principles of holographic diffraction--expose it in a pattern of a whole bunch of lines.

    Then I'd run it through NaOH to refine it, and end up with that anechoic chamber. To see my understanding of anechoic chamber, though, search for another MickLinux entry farther down, about razor blade stacks. My understanding *could* be wrong. I claim no expertise here -- though, I must caution you to read my sig anyways. [It's the principle of the thing].

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  134. Re:Beware of the darkness!! by Chewie · · Score: 1

    Actually, to paraphrase Eddie Izzard, "Here you tear your history down, man! I was watching a special on this hotel in Florida, and they said, 'we've restored this to how it looked over fifty years ago!' Surely not! No one was alive then!" Haunted carparks/stripmalls just don't have the same appeal.

    --
    49 20 68 61 76 65 20 74 6F 6F 20 6D 75 63 68 20 66 72 65 65 20 74 69 6D 65 2E
  135. Wasn't this in a Destroyer book? by spun · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember Remo Williams and Chiun fighting some guy who could make stuff well-nigh invisible with his blacker-than-black paint.

    Anyone else ever read these books? They are a hoot.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  136. keyboards! by Quixadhal · · Score: 1

    So when can we get keyboards coated with this?
    It will make ALL the difference, you know...

  137. This gives all new meaning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...to those t-shirts saying "I'm only wearing black until they find something darker"

  138. pr0n by msheppard · · Score: 1

    This material will make an excellent backround for my new pr0n site.

    M@

    --
    Krispy Cream is people
  139. No Pic?! by Dankling · · Score: 1

    I wanted to see how dark it was...

    --
    Slash-for-Thought
  140. Re:Fuligin the color that it DARKER than black by jonskerr · · Score: 1

    I used to read Shadow of the Torturer et al every year. It's darker than black, not blacker. Great books, though a bit too xtian to take now.

    --
    O~ Him that studies revenge keeps his own wounds green. -- Francis Bacon
  141. Grammar/Math Nazi by Whatever+Fits · · Score: 1

    It could revolutionise optical instruments because it reflects 10 to 20 times less light

    How can you multiply by 10 - 20 and come up with a smaller number? I've never understood this common misconception in grammar/math. It just doesn't make any sence.

    --
    My name fits again.
  142. fuligin by winghead · · Score: 1

    there's a word for the color "blacker than black": fuligin.

  143. Re:Martin Black - could be much better by Alsee · · Score: 1

    Is is theoretically possible to make a holographic pattern that would absorb like that at all wavelengths?

    No.

    Or even multiple wavelengths?

    Yes, but you run into two problems. First it is only 100% effective at the exact wavelength. The effect drops to zero pretty fast for wavelengths that are slightly off. Secondly the surface detail required gets multiplied with each extra frequency. The required level of detail would rapidly shrink below the size of an atom.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  144. Goths by supraturbo · · Score: 1

    This might bring trenchcoats back in style! :)

  145. How Many Times as Much L:ess? by serutan · · Score: 1

    I wish nobody had invented the terminology, "x number of times less." I'm pretty sure "20 times less light" means the same as "5 percent as much light," but couldn't they just say that? If it was 40 instead of 20, would we say half as much light or twice as much less light? Jeez.

  146. looney toons? by itzdandy · · Score: 1

    this must be the material the is used to make the "go anywhere, black instant round door to somewher else" in looney toons.

  147. not to mention the rolling stones by ChrisGuest · · Score: 1

    they were the ones who really got into painting things black.

  148. Dawn of Man? by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 1

    At last! Something to paint my monolith.

  149. Re:What's blacker than black... Hubble coating is by gessel · · Score: 1

    DS Black (Basically "Martin Black" as in Martin Marietta; that is the Hubble Space Telescope) is 35 times blacker than this so-called "blackest black." Forgive the journalist, it's an esoteric subject, but even the more afforadable Epner Technologies EP black is about 20x blacker.

    I've used EP black for a project, and it is, indeed, much blacker than Krylon Ultra-Flat black, which is itself not too shabby as black coatings go.

    http://www.aviantechnologies.com/coatings/av-ds- bl ack.html

    These, like the dendritic coating in the article, are fragile, and not terribly black at all if you touch them.

    -David

  150. More information in New Scientist by Simon+Field · · Score: 2, Informative


    A slightly more informative article is here.

    They give the recipe.

  151. More info about composition by mattr · · Score: 2, Informative
    More info here mentioning composition, of which I'll quote just a part (see the article for a graph and mention of applications):

    Stalagmites and craters

    By examining the surface of hundreds of alloy plates under an electron microscope, NPL has discovered where previous researchers went wrong. It has developed a two-stage technique that produces the blacker black New Scientist saw emerge from the acid tank last week.

    In the first stage, an object to be blackened is immersed for five hours in a solution of nickel sulphate and sodium hypophosphite. This produces a nickel and phosphorus coating containing between five and seven per cent phosphorus. Then the surface is etched with nitric acid to produce the super-black surface structure.

    One of the crucial discoveries, says Brown, was how the percentage of phosphorus in the nickel coating affected the surface after etching. An electron micrograph of the surface of an alloy containing more than eight per cent phosphorus (see graphic) looks like a collection of stalagmites.

    But if the phosphorus content is around six per cent the surface becomes pitted with craters. The curved craters reflect less light that the straighter-sided stalagmites, so super-black reflects about half as much light as the high-phosphorus surfaces.

    Right angle

    Super-black is especially effective at absorbing light that hits it at an angle. With the light source at right angles the super-black coating reflects less than 0.35 per cent. Black paint, by comparison, reflects about 2.5 per cent, or seven times as much. With the light source at an angle of 45, black paint reflects 25 times as much light as the super-black.

    And.. they've been working on it for a while, here is text from their 2000 lab review pdf.

    NPL Super Black In order to make accurate measurements in the UV, IR and visible regions, optical instruments and sensors need surfaces with very low reflectance. These black surfaces are used as efficient radiation detectors or may reduce stray light in an instrument. Highly efficient black surfaces allow smaller, lighter instruments to be made, which is an important advantage in aerospace applications. NPL has successfully developed a very high quality optical black ] known as NPL Super Black. The process uses an adapted nickel phosphorus electroless plating technique followed by finely controlled etching and gives probably the blackest surface known in the visible region. NPL has successfully and repeatedly produced the Super Black coating on a small-scale ecottage industryf basis for a number of years. It is now for upgrading and validating the process for plating much larger substrates with this high quality optical black. The upgrade has led to an opportunity to collaborate with CNES, Astrium and Sodern, the major space contractors for the European Space Agency, on the space evaluation of the black. If successful this will open up many new opportunities for supplying coated optics to the aerospace industry.

  152. New Black by bobba22 · · Score: 1

    Is this black the new black? If black is the absence of light and this stuff collects light in it's tiny craters then where does all the light go? Is there an event horizon? But more importantly, is it art?

    1. Re:New Black by Qantumdot · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by asking is it art?:) thats a good question about the event horizon though.

  153. Re:Solar heating COST by renecarlos · · Score: 1

    >But you can flip those numbers around and say we've achieved a 90% decrease

    But the solar figure of merit is Watts/$. Has been and will continue to be. How will a micro-tailored coating help- in fact, might it hurt?

    The solar breakthrough will probably be in mnufacturing, not materials.

    That said, I'm an amateur astronomer, and would snap this stuff up if the price wasn't ridiculous.

  154. Re:Solar Power COST by renecarlos · · Score: 1

    >The problem with solar power today

    Is cost, cost, cost. Who gives a shine about 99.9999% efficiency if no one will finance the thing? Hell, we can't even get builders to do PASSIVE solar.

    >when you need the power most (night/winter)

    In theory, yes, but some places need the most electricity during broad, summer daylight. That's when for-profit desktops tend to be on. Air conditioning, of course, is a massive energy hog. Even Chicago, frickin' Chicago, runs enough air conditioners to risk brownouts some summers.

    Even if solar is just "a valuable complement to something else," the difference between energy crisis and energy apathy is a few percent. Such is microeconomics. Generating just a few percent of our juice/heat from non-fossil is enough to turn around financial and strategic policies.

  155. ACME labs by dave_f1m · · Score: 1

    Try here: http://www.kleinbottle.com/

  156. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now I can start making those monoliths I've been planning...

  157. site? by hugecrow · · Score: 1

    does anyone have a website showing this crazy colour? ...

    --
    Enjoy your job, make lots of money, work within the law. Choose any two.
  158. Re:Martin Black - could be much better by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I would suspect that you could build some fractally repetitive surface which would still manage to get 99% of the way between where we are now, and actually having 100% absorption.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  159. Re:Right. Will someone PLEASE explain this?! by lowe0 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I always wondered about that. What's up with all the "First Post!" comments being all together?