Slashdot Mirror


Presenting The CDR-ROM

nachoboy writes "Here's a cool new idea: the CDR-ROM. Allows a portion of the CD to be written and them mass produced, leaving the remaining area recordable by the user. It may sound funny, but if AOL started sending out CD's like this I might just start keeping them around."

409 comments

  1. What would be better by sulli · · Score: 4, Funny

    would be for AOL to use CD-WOM (Write Only Memory) technology.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:What would be better by countzer0interrupt · · Score: 3, Funny
      would be for AOL to use CD-WOM (Write Only Memory) technology.
      What, so then you couldn't read the data?
    2. Re:What would be better by ericmc42 · · Score: 0

      The light comes on....

    3. Re:What would be better by PD · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, in case the filesystem on /dev/null gets corrupted, you have a backup.

    4. Re:What would be better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      9th grade is middle school on your planet?

      You earthlings are soooooo slow.

    5. Re:What would be better by ericmc42 · · Score: 0

      Yeah... kinda crazy shit

      My school district goes:
      kindergarton - own 'school' 1->5 - elementary 6->9 - middle 10->12 - high school

      I don't know why they chose to do it that way, but it seem's to work out okay.

    6. Re:What would be better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just flip the disc over in the drive, and set your software to ignore all errors. Write-Only!

    7. Re:What would be better by jeffy124 · · Score: 1

      nah, aol wont want that. the RIAA on the other hand......

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    8. Re:What would be better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      AOL Time Warner is a leading member company of both RIAA and MPAA.

    9. Re:What would be better by murphyslawyer · · Score: 2
      Sorry, I believe Elmer Fudd has the patent on this already...

      --
      I ain't evil, I'm just good looking.
    10. Re:What would be better by worst_name_ever · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can't anyone post to Slashdot these days without spreading around more FUDD?

      --

      In Soviet Rush, today's Tom Sawyer gets high on you.
    11. Re:What would be better by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1

      dis is tha FUD matcheen mein.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    12. Re:What would be better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as they print a picture of Elmer Fudd on it, I'd be cool with it.

    13. Re:What would be better by alexburke · · Score: 4, Funny
      would be for AOL to use CD-WOM (Write Only Memory) technology.

      Elmer Fudd would approve.

      /me ducks

    14. Re:What would be better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, but then it would be White Only Memorwy. But then again BLACK PEOPLE CAN'T AFFORD CD BURNERS ANYWAY!

    15. Re:What would be better by sossles · · Score: 1

      Give them time and they will. Wome wasn't built in a day, y'know.

    16. Re:What would be better by Talez · · Score: 1

      Be vewy vewy qwiet... I'm hunting Steve Case!

      huhuhuhuhuhuhuhu!

    17. Re:What would be better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are a lot of cornball jokes going on in this thread, but yours was the funniest.

    18. Re:What would be better by salimma · · Score: 1

      Nope. What I want is if AOL pipes the output of /dev/random to their CDs. So clueless people will say 'wow cool! Pre-computed random bytes' and use it for their GnuPG keys.

      Which won't be random at all, then I can be the evil Master of Darkness! Muahahahaha!

      1. AOL puts /dev/random into CD
      2. Clueless n00bs use AOL CD for 'one-time pad'
      3. I get to read credit-card numbers
      4. Profit!!!

      Note for FBI and NSA: this is a joke!!

      --
      Michel
      Fedora Project Contribut
    19. Re:What would be better by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      I don't get this while thing. How this "CDR-ROM" is different from a good old CDR with one session burned. Nobody can erase the session and you still can write some more....

    20. Re:What would be better by asalazar · · Score: 1

      Note for FBI and NSA: this is a joke!!


      If you have to emphasize that with italics and exclamation marks, "The land of the freedom" is near from becoming just "The land".

      *Shudders*
      --
      Slashdot: Where the sig outsmarts the comment
    21. Re:What would be better by salimma · · Score: 1
      I'm not American so I have to be even more careful (funny eh? Used to be that countries only have jurisdiction over their own citizens and populace).

      Then again, tell that to the 'illegal combatants' from Western countries - Britain, Canada, Sweden - as well as some luckless Americans - now held up in Guantanamo Bay.

      --
      Michel
      Fedora Project Contribut
  2. speaking of aol... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    how's that million-cd march going along?

    1. Re:speaking of aol... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As of February 19, the No More AOL CDs project has collected 141,803 CDs.

  3. Why would AOL do that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's bound to be more expensive than the super cheap plain CD-Rs. I actually think these would only have limited usefulness.

    1. Re:Why would AOL do that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a troll? Give me a break. Disagree with the story blurb and you're a troll here? Sheesh.

    2. Re:Why would AOL do that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, companies might get a hold of these new CD's and make them even cheaper than CD-R's. They might burn a small ad on the CD so that whenever you write to it or even view it, the company logo might pop up, play a little jingle, or something like that

    3. Re:Why would AOL do that? by questionlp · · Score: 1

      In AOL's case, it would probably is cheaper for them to stick with pressed CD's instead of using recordable CDs in the first place.

    4. Re:Why would AOL do that? by Squareball · · Score: 2, Funny

      *whew* and I feared it would be used for something annoying

    5. Re:Why would AOL do that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually they could use these for software distribution and still have an unique key per disk. On the other hand, having the latest patches in CDR portion would be nice.

    6. Re:Why would AOL do that? by i+chose+quality · · Score: 1

      how's it supposed to do that without some sort of autostart-code, which will definitely not run on my machine??

      just plain curious...

      --
      the computer is online
      i am not at it
      what a waste of ressources
    7. Re:Why would AOL do that? by leonardluen · · Score: 1

      among their "limited" userfulness i bet we will see it used as a copy protection method.

      when you install the program you need to write something to the writeable area which disables the installer so you can install it on multiple machines

  4. So I'll get an AOL cd by r_arr · · Score: 2, Funny

    with not only aol software but MSN also.

  5. Viable idea by unterderbrucke · · Score: 5, Interesting

    CD-ROMRW

    The kiddies could use a program to take care of their little Pokemon/Yu-gi-oh/the popular electronic pet du jour, and write it to the cd when they're done and carry it around for them. No need to carry around a disc to play your saved game.

    1. Re:Viable idea by s88 · · Score: 1

      Dont you mean CDRW-ROM

    2. Re:Viable idea by 403Forbidden · · Score: 1

      Damn straight it's viable.... i've had this idea for years, too bad i'm only like 15 and have no klout in the electronics world at all.

      Number of times one of my ideas becamed a patented product: 2.

    3. Re:Viable idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember when I invented Snoopy, the bi-plane and the Howitzer, but since I'm just 11 I couldn't get them patented.

      Numbered of times one of my ideas becamed a patented producted: Threed

    4. Re:Viable idea by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 1

      This was talked about as a format of Sony's MiniDiscs. Even before the first ones showed up, they said it would be possible to make a disc that contained a RO section and a MO area where new data could be written. I don't know if any discs like this were ever released.

      Also don't recordable DVDs have a reigion that is ROM to keep people from writing the encrytions keys, and thus making perfect copys of originals (of course if you decrypt the original first...).

    5. Re:Viable idea by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 1

      Number of times one of my ideas becamed a patented product: 2.

      What was the other one?

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
    6. Re:Viable idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This could be used for some sort of new copy protection- such as 'tying' individual discs to hardware when first run.

    7. Re:Viable idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod this up! this is one of the few uses this technology might actually be utilized for.

    8. Re:Viable idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to make a decision: do you want to try to maximize your profit off your ideas, or would you rather get the widest distribution for them?

      As a kid, I used to talk about things over dinner, then would see them pop up in the "new tech" section of a newspaper or magazine a few years later. It happens.

      I finally decided that while some things are worthy of my attention, there is little point in hoarding all of them. That's why I'll drop into places like this and post a few ideas and hopefully plant some seeds. If someone else runs with it, at least some day there's a chance that I might get to use the fruits of their labor. That's better than sitting on it and hoping someone else has the same idea some day...

    9. Re:Viable idea by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      >>Number of times one of my ideas becamed a patented product: 2.

      In 1976(I was 10) I designed a Lego shock absorber. It was made up of a long black 'bar' piece with grey connectors on both ends, and a round 'slidey' piece. The shock absorber was a retractable pen spring. This thing worked great. Motorized vehicles no had the ability to climb over small books, and lego bricks.

      I used to make them for friends & stuff. They were quite the hit in our circle of friends.

      In 1977 or 78 I saw almost the same design in retail Lego kits. Damn. That sucked. But it did make me feel pretty smart at the same time.

      --
      Huh?
    10. Re:Viable idea by 403Forbidden · · Score: 1

      That weird pancake pan that has two sides, and a hinge on the one end.... yeah I came up with that idea when I was like 8. Kinda shows how bad it actually is.

    11. Re:Viable idea by sbaker · · Score: 1

      Yeah - I 'invented' laser tag games 5 years before they really appeared.

      Still - you'd have to patent it then everyone here on /. would hate you - so I guess you're better off.

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
    12. Re:Viable idea by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 1

      Patenting laser tag wouldn't get you hated. Patenting tag would.

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
    13. Re:Viable idea by dickens · · Score: 1

      In 1970 I invented the "electronic battleship" game.
      I was 9.

      Wah.

    14. Re:Viable idea by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Number of times one of my ideas becamed a patented product: 2.

      That's why having an idea means nothing unless you actually do something about it. All my life I've seend products going around and thought "Damn! I thought about that n years ago!". But then you think about the whole process of standardizing, commercializing and acually building a product out of your idea and it turns out that (maybe) these guys thought about it way before you did!

  6. Copyright by geogeek6_7 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not a big jump till we get to the C-DRM or CD-MCA huh? :P

    ~geogeek

  7. I haven't seen this idea before with any media by Eese · · Score: 1

    I can't really see this taking off... I mean, using the AOL idea, I think it would be a fair bit of a hassle using reduced-capacity CDs. I'm not sure about everyone, but I think most of the geeks I know would rather use a regular CD-R.

    1. Re:I haven't seen this idea before with any media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point, which you clearly failed to miss, is that they'd be free and plentiful.

  8. Could be good for... by The+Analog+Kid · · Score: 1

    A person doing a report or maybe some Quake 3 maps or whatever, so they can back them up as they go along and if they screw up or want to change something they can just pop the CDR-ROM in and load it up.

    1. Re:Could be good for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      am i missing the whole point? couldn't exactly the same be done with multisession CDs? i mean, im all for new technology, but this seems really pointles

      as for the aol example, i dont see them doing it. if they really want to be nice to their suck^H^H^H^H customers, they'd just start a multi session CD, burn their crap on it, and let their customers write on the rest

    2. Re:Could be good for... by GoogolPlexPlex · · Score: 1

      The point that you are missing is that the data on mass-produced CD's is not "burnt" into the recording medium (which requires a laser to scan past each recording position on the surface of the disk) - instead, they are kind of "stamped", (writing out all the data in one go) which is much quicker to do when you need to make 500,000 of them.

    3. Re:Could be good for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then why can't you just stamp the first half of the disk and leave the rest blank?

      I'm usre theres a reason... I mean if you COULD do it, it would be done already.

    4. Re:Could be good for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      okay, i can see how this technology could be useful, although it depends on the price a bit.

      anyway, it still has nothing to do with what the parent suggested, being able to write on a CD multiple times, backing up as you go along

  9. good idea by Raptorman2k · · Score: 1

    I like that idea. I think aol, or any company that wanted to advertise would do well having CD's with their logos (Advertisements) and still allow the remaining memory to be used

    1. Re:good idea by Jondor · · Score: 4, Funny

      yeah, and then we collect them, fill them up with porn and let them lay around in places.. Maybe we can even take bets on howlong it will take for the first lawsuit accusing AOL of distributing pr0n..;)

      --
      Nobody expects the spanish inquisition!
    2. Re:good idea by eyeye · · Score: 1

      Heh, thats a funny idea :-)

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
  10. What the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hell is the use of this anyway?

    1. Re:What the by orangesquid · · Score: 1

      How about backup CDs? Everybody has their favorite suite of freeware and stuff they use and install on new machines when they buy them. Wouldn't it be great if those TOSHIBA RESTORE DISCS contained your Windows version of gvim, lcc, cygwin, and other personally favored utilities?

      Or how about electronic surveys that come in the mail, get the answers recorded in the second half, and get send back in a SASE or postage-paid envelope?

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
  11. Not that new by snack-a-lot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Multi-session CD writes offer a similar functionality. The first widespread use of this was the Kodak PhotoCD - you could put your photos on the same CD again and again until it was full, because it used multi-session.

    1. Re:Not that new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In fact I seem to recall (circa 1996 ?) that AOL sent out a CD without the session being properly closed (or some such flaw) so you could write more stuff to it. One of the guys in the office was collecting them to write his data on.

    2. Re:Not that new by Junta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is new. I would debate usefulness, but it is novel.

      The idea is that a subset of those sessions are write-once (CD-Rs). Maybe stamped, maybe burned (didn't read the article), but in any event, they can be written only once and never reused.

      The rest of the disc would be CD-RW. So if you wrote a session and filled the disc, you could re-use a session burned to the RW section of the disc.

      Not too useful. *Maybe* you could have a game run entirely from CD, saving progress in the RW area. If the drives are fast enough, and the game writers efficient with game state information required in a save file, this *could* be feasible. This is still a stretch as the cost/benefit ratio is still garbage...

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    3. Re:Not that new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why were AOL using CD-Rs? At 1996 speeds they'd be up all night burning them

    4. Re:Not that new by snack-a-lot · · Score: 1

      It seems that the new thing is that the first session is already stamped and not finalised, and the rest of the CD is of a suitable form to be burned to. Stamping and burning usually require different materials to make the CD, but they appear to have a hybrid here.

    5. Re:Not that new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's very important to note that stamping data is much cheaper than burning it (in large quantities).

    6. Re:Not that new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering games are sold for $50, the extra cost wouldn't sap the profit too bad. You have a good idea there, though; games for cd-players! Heck, the original PSX could've used this tech to eliminate the memory card nonsense.

    7. Re:Not that new by adolf · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell, Kodak is doing the supposedly-new "CDR-ROM" thing with their PictureCD blanks, and has been probably since the format's inception.

      They come on spindles of 50, with program data visibly already on the disc. JPEG-formatted pictures are written to the next session. Since the volume of PictureCDs consumed daily is enormous, this program data is almost certainly stamped or molded into the disc during manufacture.

      Sadly, unlike the PhotoCD format, this is where the multisession goodness stops (at least with the Kodak-approved software we use at work). Any attempt to put more photos on the disc after the initial burn results in nothing but an error.

      Ah, well. The low-res JPEGs on a PictureCD are a far cry from the high-res lossless PhotoCD images of yesteryear, anyhow.

    8. Re:Not that new by Jerek+Dain · · Score: 1

      I think the cost/benefit ratio is better than you think. They could (and asuredly would) set the CD to auto-run some AOL software whenever you insert the CD, giving them much more in-home precense on your very computer, and you'd not do anything about it, because, hey, free transportable media space! Much more space than a floppy, less trouble than a ZIP disk, and freer than buying your own CD-R/CD-RW disks. It's a good advertising move, and one which I wouldn't mind, since I'd definately be making use of it.

      --
      Conversations tend to be so much more civil when there's a chance the other person might snap and kill you.
    9. Re:Not that new by phorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      *Maybe* you could have a game run entirely from CD, saving progress in the RW area

      A really good idea... but a few hitches:
      -What about drivers for the particular burner, or is there a generic?
      -Needs to have it's own burning software.

      Even rewritable discs have a finite lifetime, although technically so do diskettes.

    10. Re:Not that new by Narcissus · · Score: 1

      You mean to say that AOL were sending out their stuff on CDRs? I'm definitely no expert in this area, but wouldn't they have been sending out pressed CDs? As far as I was aware, no CD burner writes to a pressed CD, so what would it matter if the session was closed or not?

      Oh, and I think you meant the disc wasn't closed, because, once again, as far as I knew, an unclosed session wasn't readable at all...

    11. Re:Not that new by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1

      In fact in the original discussions of CD-ROMs as CD- was brought up, it was considered something that would be part of the various competing recordable formats. It just never caught on. Nothing in the format prevents it though, and one could stamp a CD-R with a prerecorded session or sessions if one wanted to. Of course burner software would have to be updated, but thats not that big a deal. Ideally the drives would have special accomadations, but they need not. This conceptually dates back to the early 1980s. I have some original Toshiba documents that came with my SCSI CD-ROM in 1983 or 1984 along with an NCR SCSI interface (8-bit!) that was not much more than a glorified parallel port with all the SCSI protocol dealt with through software.

      --
      - Tjp

      I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

    12. Re:Not that new by palp · · Score: 1

      Except that when the original PSX first came out, changing that CDROM to a CDRW would have upped te price a couple hundred..

      --
      -palp
    13. Re:Not that new by Junta · · Score: 1

      Drivers are generic (at least in linux, everything modern is done through generic SCSI or scsi emulation over IDE.

      My misunderstanding is saying that it was RW, when in fact it is just recordable, the new thing being able to stamp part of it to save on costs, but leave the rest open for whatever.

      If they extended it to RW, then the save-on-the-cd concept could work (burning software can be lightweight, if specialized, cdrecord is small and can do a bit of stuff.)

      Of course, the practical implications I still say are limited. Could be used in consoles to make discs more 'cartridge-like', but the tech would probably be ultimately slower than memory cards (unless you want the console to sound like a jet engine while saving), and console users have become used to memory cards. Nearly zero practical application of this strategy in PCs (maybe gaming on the go, but few people care).

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    14. Re:Not that new by phorm · · Score: 1

      Not a bad idea for consoles, though newer ones use DVD and a writable format of such is not cheap.
      Actually, for PC's a neat trick instead of this might be to make the game come on DVD/CD, with a tiny USB storage dongle much like a memcard. I've seen many such dongles available, a small one could be made cheap and small enough to package with a game

  12. Hmm by Cyno01 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wouldnt CDRW-ROM make more sense? why would you have a write once portion of a disc with a part already stamped. With a CDRW-ROM you could save your games on the game cd, no more save files or memory cartriges.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Hmm by Hydrogenoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Easy...
      Install once, write on the CD "I have been installed" and refuse nay other installation attempt.

    2. Re:Hmm by Cyno01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But only if you put it in a writer drive ;) I've got a 12x4x24 CD-RW drive and a 4xDVD/48xCD-ROM drive, which one do you think i install stuff from.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    3. Re:Hmm by aridhol · · Score: 1
      Hey...don't give them ideas.

      But I don't use my writer to install from, so it wouldn't affect me.

      --
      I can't say that I don't give a fuck. I've just run out of fuck to give.
    4. Re:Hmm by Target+Drone · · Score: 3, Informative
      Wouldnt CDRW-ROM make more sense?

      Looking at the specsfor this thing it is "Equivalent to an appendable single session CD-R". I get the impression that this might be just a standard CDR. What's new is that the've developed some faster way to write the disc.

      The reason they don't have RW is because they cost a lot more and also because a user could accidently erase the entire disc (or important tracks). One of the selling features is to create a disc with your software and then burn a second session with a disk-id or DRM info. You wouldn't want the user to be able to delte the disk-id.

    5. Re:Hmm by spazoid12 · · Score: 1

      It would make more sense for uses that you have in mind. But, I'd guess CDR-ROM is more useful for people like Intuit. I'm guessing the software vendors are pushing for this...or the media makers are hoping the software people will jump on it.

      It used to be nobody had a CDROM drive. Now days, everyone does. And how long until "everyone" has a CDRW? Pretty much everyone I know (yep, all 2).

      A software vendor could develop an installer that requires you install from a CDRW drive. It only installs if the writeable portions hasn't already been modified (by the installer on the first installation).

    6. Re:Hmm by Hydrogenoid · · Score: 1

      Problem is: are you sure you'd be allowed to choose?

    7. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hm, so in future we can see CD writers as requirments for software? while i guess everybody here has one, /. isn't exactly representative. if you were forced to have a CDR drive to install software, a lot of people wont be able to install that software

    8. Re:Hmm by cyrax777 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      even if one didnt have a Read only drive u could always rip the iso burn to blank then install from the burn leaving the original untouched.

    9. Re:Hmm by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "Easy...
      Install once, write on the CD "I have been installed" and refuse nay other installation attempt."


      I predict that Sharpie stocks will go up.

    10. Re:Hmm by Radical+Rad · · Score: 1

      Anti Piracy
      - Copy protected CD-Rs

      This sounds a lot like the copy protected floppies they used to use where various errors were written to the disk at the factory and couldn't be recreated by a standard drive/controller.

      Data Security
      - CD-ROMs fingerprinted to individual PCs

      So it would become impossible to run Acme Windows XZ on my computer after I upgrade the motherboard or replace a fried ethernet card.

      The only advantage to the consumer that I can think of would be not having to type in a 24 digit serial number and authorization key.

    11. Re:Hmm by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      This is similar to what Microsoft did with the last versions of Windows shipped on floppies (Windows 95 was the last I believe... all 22 floppies)

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    12. Re:Hmm by jcoy42 · · Score: 1

      Things like a windows installation CD. It could write the hardware list of the computer it was installed on, and then refuse to load on another system. Microsoft would love it.

      --
      Never trust an atom. They make up everything.
    13. Re:Hmm by Reziac · · Score: 1

      This was why I made backups of my M$Office 3.0's 26 floppies *before* installing it -- because the installer writes back to the disk, and I have a twitch about installer backups being virginal. All M$ stuff did during that era, to "personalize" each copy. It would still install anywhere, but would have your personal info written into the registry.

      (Not that a little cruise with regedit couldn't fix that.)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    14. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have even a bigger problem!!. What if you change your computer?. That means you can't re-install it into your new equipment!

    15. Re:Hmm by aonaran · · Score: 1

      usually companies that use licencing like this have a revoke licence code that the computer will spit out when you uninstall that either gets written to the floppy (or CD-RW) that holds the licence info, or can be used at their web-site or phone help desk to get a new valid key. ...doesn't help if your PC dies before you can uninstall and get the revoke licence code, but they almost always have a way to work around that.

    16. Re:Hmm by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      usually companies that use licencing like this have a revoke licence code that the computer will spit out when you uninstall
      And if the HD dies before you uninstall?
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    17. Re:Hmm by aonaran · · Score: 1

      If you read all the way down to the next line I said they usually have ways to get around that sort of thing. (usually involves just a phone call that lasts all afternoon in my experience, but sometimes a letter from someone important in the company explaining the situation.

      Keep in mind that this sort of licencing is only used for software that costs in the thousands per seat. Lotus tried it with 1-2-3 back in the DOS days and lost a lot of money on it because it's a major hassle for both them and the customer, so it's not worth it for a $100 program, but for a $6000+ dollar per seat program there is a better chance of something like that being used.

    18. Re:Hmm by skipscum · · Score: 1

      >Install once, write on the CD "I have been installed" and refuse nay other installation attempt.

      This would be easy to get around - After getting the disk from the shop, make an exact copy of the contents of the RW section. You can leter restore its origional setting at any point after you have you have ran/installed the program to get rid of the the DRM code that has been written to the disk

  13. good by misterhaan · · Score: 1

    i've often thought that it's a waste to use a whole cd for 100 or so meg of data or 15 or so minutes of audio . . . it'd be nice if this got widely used!

    --

    track7.org has all kinds of interesting stuff!

    1. Re:good by Jaycatt · · Score: 1

      I know what you mean... I feel bad when I only want to burn 50-100MB of space. Usually I throw extra stuff on discs like that just not to "waste" it.

      --
      "Shared pain is lessened; shared joy is increased. Thus we refute entropy" - Spider Robinson
    2. Re:good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *cough*Multi-Session CD*cough*

  14. Too little...too late by djupedal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    DVD-R, maybe....but CD-R's are simply too small. Apple and SUSE as an example distribute using DVD. The message is smaller media is already on the demise, so why encourage it. Otherwise, a 'reusable' piece of (free) storage isn't a bad way to gain some respect.

    1. Re:Too little...too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, MacOS X 1.2 shipped on a CD (well, two of them...) The full package that comes with a new Mac might be different, though.

    2. Re:Too little...too late by Abcd1234 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      DVD-R, maybe....but CD-R's are simply too small. Apple and SUSE as an example distribute using DVD. The message is smaller media is already on the demise, so why encourage it.

      Yeah, 'cuz DVD writers and their associated media are so incredibly cheap, right? Oh, wait, DVD burners cost on the order of 5 to 6 times more than their CDRW counterparts, and the difference in media cost is even greater!

      Well, then again, at least compatibility amongst DVD writers is really good, right? No, wait, we have a variety of competing standards, and only now does it appear that a consensus is forming.

      Sorry, but from everything I can tell, DVD writing is still in it's infancy, compared to the now-mature CDRW technology, so I wouldn't ring the death nell on CDR just yet. In five years, though, you might be right.

    3. Re:Too little...too late by eVarmint · · Score: 1
      DVD-R, maybe....but CD-R's are simply too small.

      By this logic, we should have dropped 3.5" floppy disks ages ago, but they remain useful after more than two decades.

      DVD's are bigger, sure, but CDR's are cheap, ubiquitous, and useful. To supplant CD's we'll need something cheaper, ubiquitous, and more useful. I'm thinking that next step will be to bypass media altogether with high-bandwidth remote storage.

    4. Re:Too little...too late by Fwonkas · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Well, then again, at least compatibility amongst DVD writers is really good, right? No, wait, we have a variety of competing standards, and only now does it appear that a consensus is forming.

      Mods forgive me if I'm going off topic here, but can some explain to me why exactly this sort of competition is so bad? We certainly argue that having a variety of desktop environments / window managers encourages competition and progress.

      Don't get me wrong. I can see some (at least short-term) pitfalls with competing standards. But isn't the idea that the possible outcomes of competition overshadow these pitfalls?

      I say, let there be competing standards, especially while DVD writers are expensive. Eventually one standard will probably prevail, and by the time prices go down standards won't be an issue.

      I could be wrong. Like I said, someone please enlighten me if I'm missing something.

      --
      COMPUTER! Whatever happened to Blueberry Muffin?
    5. Re:Too little...too late by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Mods forgive me if I'm going off topic here, but can some explain to me why exactly this sort of competition is so bad?

      Whoa, don't get me wrong here. I don't think having competing standards is bad at all. My only point is that, until a single, usable standard is in place, there is no guarantee that Joe Sixpack A would be able to by a set of DVD-Rs and have them be fully compatible with his drive. Moreover, the burned DVD-Rs might not work on Bob's DVD drive down the street.

      Until we can have a reasonable guarantee of compatibility, your regular user will not flock to DVD-R as a CDR replacement, simply because of the difficulty of use.

    6. Re:Too little...too late by Malc · · Score: 1

      No worries. This technology has also been applied to DVDs too. They were looking at compatibility of the disks where I work over a year ago with existing DVD-ROM drives and set top boxes. Dunno when or if we'll see them though.

    7. Re:Too little...too late by Decimal · · Score: 1

      DVD-R, maybe....but CD-R's are simply too small. Apple and SUSE as an example distribute using DVD.

      Sounds like a good way to reduce bloat.

      --

      Remember "Bring 'em on"? *sigh
    8. Re:Too little...too late by adolf · · Score: 1

      I recall the same argument some years ago, about CD-R vs. floppies (or was it zip discs, Jaz, LS-120, Bernouli, Syquest, MD-Data, Floptical, WORM, QIC-80, those funky crystalized 2.88-meg discs that only worked in PS/2s, or...). But since there was a massive installed base of CD-ROM readers, it was pretty obvious which format was going to take hold.

      Strange, how history repeats.

      Assuming the trend holds true: On March 10, Plextor will begun shipping DVD burners, for about a hundred bucks less than I paid for an 8x CD-R from the same company (which, FYI, is still working flawlessly). DVD media prices currently are comparable to what I paid back then for CD-R blanks. New computers ship with the ability to read DVDs, almost as a rule.

      Five years? Naah. Things are stable enough right now. In five years, all that will change is speed (you think ATA-133 and U320 are fast? Ha!), price (cheaper than peanuts), and availability (to be available in every 7-11 in the world).

      Your definition of "maturity" seems mean the same thing as everyone else's defintion of "elderly." Get with it, man.

    9. Re:Too little...too late by drix · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but that's nonsense. CDROM drives have an installed base of probably half a billion units worldwide. That's orders of magnitude higher than any of the DVD writable standards--which aren't even cross compatible--can claim. CD readers are dirt cheap and ubiquitous. The overwhelming majority of all media is distributed on CD today, and will continue to be for probably the next decade. Case in point: Sony invented the 3.5" floppy drive in 1980 and codeveloped (with Philips) the CD drive two years later. Just off the top of my head, I can recall software packages being distributed as late as 1998 that were still on 3.5" and 5.25" floppies. So it took nearly a decade and a half for that change to occur. We're in year 4 of DVD.

      --

      I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
  15. A few stupid ideas by mao+che+minh · · Score: 1
    1. A personal journal application, completely self contained, in which the application runs off the disk and burns your journal to the free space.

    2. An image viewing and burning application. The application is small and is contained on the read only portion. The user uses it to build a new gallery on the CD, and then burn it.

    1. Re:A few stupid ideas by gmuslera · · Score: 1
      3. Live CDs with Linux preloaded, and the ability to add more apps/data to it.

      There is a knoppix version to play i.e. movies, so you can put a bootable linux, and add the movie you want.

      Or SuSE Live CD version, that have a lot of example applications, if you have some space you can decide some of the extra applications included.

      Or Linux firewalls on CD, have it preburned, configure it and burn the configuration in the writable space.

    2. Re:A few stupid ideas by Boss,+Pointy+Haired · · Score: 2, Funny

      runs off the disk

      Runs off the disk? That went out of the window with the BBC Micro.

      I've not been in programming for a while, but apparently it is no longer possible to write a program that does not require "installing", and the creation of about 6 bazillion registry entries. :(

    3. Re:A few stupid ideas by echeslack · · Score: 1

      huh? that is just plain wrong. you don't necessarily need to install stuff. you can run off of any kind of storage. installing stuff is just to keep stuff in convenient locations, make searching for shared libraries simpler, etc. but definitely not necessary

    4. Re:A few stupid ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tax software with your return on CDR...

  16. MS license. by grub · · Score: 1


    193b.88a-0 You may not use the recordable portion of the CDR-ROM for storing GPL licensed software.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  17. Not exactly the same thing, but..... by hudsonhawk · · Score: 1

    They tried doing something like this with cassettes in the 70's, where you'd have the program on Side A, and then Side B would be left blank and tabbed so you could record whatever you wanted.

    IIRC it was a failure because consumers felt like they were getting ripped off, paying for a half-blank cassette.

    Or maybe because it was annoying to have to rewind through 45 minutes of dead air to get back to the beginning again.

  18. Is this good or bad? by GrouchoMarx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Good: Knoppix CDs that boot themselves and then let you write to a small section of the CD, so that you can keep a permanent record of the files you write in the computer lab.

    Bad (and the likely goal): CDRs that have DRM features written at the beginning of the disk to keep you from writing "untrusted" content to the rest of it. Watch these replace normal CDRs and hurt the CD remixing industry. (While the RIAA collects a higher piracy tax on them anyway.)

    --

    --GrouchoMarx
    Card-carrying member of the EFF, FSF, and ACLU. Are you?

    1. Re:Is this good or bad? by ZxCv · · Score: 1

      ...Watch these replace normal CDRs....

      While this may be the goal, I highly doubt it will actually happen unless a law comes about requiring DRM on CD-Rs. Otherwise, there are simply enough people that won't tolerate DRM-tainted CD-Rs to sustain a healthy market for plain ol' regular CD-Rs.

      --

      Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
    2. Re:Is this good or bad? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      CDRs that have DRM features written at the beginning of the disk to keep you from writing "untrusted" content to the rest of it.

      Could you describe how this could possibly be implemented? You'd have to have something in the CD burner, or software on the computer, which can take advantage of the data which is written to the pre-written part of the disk to enforce these "DRM" features. But 1) the disc is supposedly fully compatible with all existing CD burners (which don't have said features), and 2) anyone can use their own software for burning CDs (cdrecord, at the minimum).

      Basically, without proof, I don't see how this is anything more than paranoid...

    3. Re:Is this good or bad? by aridhol · · Score: 1

      So don't use them in DRM-compliant operating systems. Put a label on them, clearly stating that they don't work in broken-by-design systems. Say why they don't work on DRM-compliant machines. Raise public awareness.

      --
      I can't say that I don't give a fuck. I've just run out of fuck to give.
    4. Re:Is this good or bad? by GoRK · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Knoppix could already do this with normal CD-R's.. You can burn more data onto a multisession disc that isn't full. Have you actually even used a copy of knoppix that was on a pressed CD anyway? I don't think there have ever been any produced (but there probably have -- distributed with a magazine or for a tradeshow or something)

      It would probably be just as cheap to publish the software onto a CD-R directly than it would be to publish it on a CD-R/CD-ROM hybrid disc anyway.

    5. Re:Is this good or bad? by aridhol · · Score: 1

      True, you can't control the recorder. However, you can control the player, which can check for the DRM track, then check for signatures in the music. No signatures on a DRM disc, no playing on a DRM player.

      --
      I can't say that I don't give a fuck. I've just run out of fuck to give.
    6. Re:Is this good or bad? by arcturus21 · · Score: 1

      We like to call this software on the computer speak of "Windows"

    7. Re:Is this good or bad? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's a lot harder to control the player than it seems. Just look at DVDs and the whole DeCSS debacle. The movie industry explicitely tried to control all players, and they failed miserably.

    8. Re:Is this good or bad? by Aumaden · · Score: 1
      I doubt that DRM will be implemented in that fashion. Rather I expect the software vendor will use the cdr portion to burn unique a serial number on each cd. Probably with a digital signature as well, to prevent alteration.

      You install it and the activation process registers that serial number with the manufacturer. If you make a copy, it carries with it your serial number. If that copy shows up on a site or is used for other activations, suddenly your software stops working.

      On the positive side, it would be nice not to spend 2 hours looking for the original jewel case so you can reinstall windows for the second time this month. Sigh.

      --Aumaden

    9. Re:Is this good or bad? by sbaker · · Score: 1

      Weren't we rather lucky with the DeCSS thing? Didn't someone at a DVD drive manufacturer give away the magic code? I don't think it was 'cracked' in a cryptographic sense. Next time around, it'll be more like the X-box - no hope whatever of cracking the code - mod chips let you do other things with the box - but don't help you with cracking the media format.

      Cryptography is getting too good...it's a two-edged sword.

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
    10. Re:Is this good or bad? by darqchild · · Score: 1

      My thought is that software and music CDs might leave some blank space, for DRM information to be written after the first use/installation.

      So, you purchase your software/music and information that uniquely identifies your computer/media appliance is written to the disk, and checked each time you use your software to make sure that you don't do somthing evil, like upgrading or replacing your computer without relicensing all your software.

      Well, you can tell i like this idea alot

      --
      What? Me? Worry?
  19. what?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    how is it a cool new idea to uncheck the 'finalize cd' button?!

  20. not really a new idea... by joggle · · Score: 1

    I'm nearly positive that Sony MiniDiscs support a format where part of the disk could be read-only while the rest is read/write.

    1. Re:not really a new idea... by fathomDragon · · Score: 1

      MiniDiscs do have re-writable capabilities, but I don't think part of it can be read-only, while another part is read/write. They do have little slider tabs that allow for switching from read-only to read/write. I have a MiniDisc player/recorder, and I absolutely adore it. It's skip-free, scratch-proof, and rewritable media, for roughly $2 a disc. It's possible that there is a format where part of it can be read-only, but I havn't found anything about it.

    2. Re:not really a new idea... by joggle · · Score: 1
      I know for sure that read-only forms of MiniDiscs exist, although they're almost all in Japan (MiniDiscs are very popular over there). I also have a MiniDisc player/recorder and also really enjoy it (I wish it would take on here, but I guess it never will at this point).

      Once, when I was really bored I went to Sony's website and read some white papers on the MiniDisc format and vaguely recall that they had 3 formats: 1) read-write for consumers to put their music on; 2) read-only for mass produced copies of an album; 3) read-only + read-write so that you could buy a stamped MiniDisc with some songs you like already on it and room to put on additional songs.

  21. Collectors by Selfbain · · Score: 1

    The people that collect those AOL CDs (I've heard of some selling on ebay for insane amounts) would suddenly have a huge amount of storage space to work with.

    --
    Well, it has never been successfully tested.
  22. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  23. fully redundant pc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CDR-ROM
    NIC Card
    scsi interface
    ram memory
    hdd drive
    LCD display
    dvd disk

  24. Could be used for drm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you install a program from the cd, the install makes a unique code of the PC's configuration and burn it on to the cd. It would have to be inserted everytime you wanted to use it. It would stop you using it on another computer because it wouldn't match the unique code burned on to the cd.

    1. Re:Could be used for drm. by jd142 · · Score: 1

      What happens if your computer doesn't have a cd-r, just a dvd player?

  25. Sounds like a step towards DRM by n1ywb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Similar to how Secure Digital memory works, since you can't alter the contents of the ROM portion of the disc. It could contain secure hashes, or even codecs or other encryption/communication code. You buy a stack of the discs and burn songs onto them at the music store, then they only let you play them x number of times, a la SD. Or maybe you buy music CDs with the music already in the ROM part, but the R/W part is updated each time you play it. Or the R/W part must be encoded with some kind of machine specific ID so you can't play the disc in other players.

    I know I know I'm being totally paranoid. There are a million and one potential NON DRM uses for this idea.

    --
    -73, de n1ywb
    www.n1ywb.com
    1. Re:Sounds like a step towards DRM by Zerbey · · Score: 1

      You buy a stack of the discs and burn songs onto them at the music store, then they only let you play them x number of times, a la SD. Or maybe you buy music CDs with the music already in the ROM part, but the R/W part is updated each time you play it.

      That would only work if:

      1. You had to use software to play the songs and,
      2. You where playing it on a CD-RW

      It's technically difficult and expensive. Also, with current technology CD-RW's are only good for a finite number of rewrites.

      Either way, I bet the RIAA is already researching it! :)

      73, Chris KG4TSM

    2. Re:Sounds like a step towards DRM by RTPMatt · · Score: 1

      Just dont play it in a CD-R drive, if the drive cant write, it cant change the CDs contents

    3. Re:Sounds like a step towards DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back when Windows was installed by floppy disks, there was a check to see if the disk had been used in an install already. If there had been an install, a pop up message would appear warning the user of software piracy.

    4. Re:Sounds like a step towards DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and it will most likely refuse to run if it is not in a CD-R Drive.

  26. Attention John Ashcroft! by grub · · Score: 1


    Right now at this very moment Al Quaeda terrorists are using apparently innocuous AOL CDR-ROMs for sending their encrypted marching orders to their cells around the country!

    Ban CDR-ROM!

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Attention John Ashcroft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, better to ban AOL ;)

  27. Copy Protection use... by MisterFancypants · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Could enable publishers to have CD-KEYs on software/games that are unique for each printed CD. Doesn't make the software uncopyable/uncrackable, of course, but it would make things a big harder on Joe Compaq who knows about 'serialz' sites but not much more.

    1. Re:Copy Protection use... by StriderA · · Score: 1

      And that this 'serialz' fluent LUSER would download the "NO-CD CRACK" or, even get a program that gets the key from the cd. Either way, it's still a vain attempt. Cracks are just as easy to get as serials.

      --
      "When will this FP stuff stop?" "After the great growing..." "The great growing?" "Yea, when people grow up."
  28. AOL's floppies by BWJones · · Score: 1

    It may sound funny, but if AOL started sending out CD's like this I might just start keeping them around.

    Geez, this is exactly what I used to do when AOL was spamming everyone with floppy disks. Remember those?

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:AOL's floppies by Zerbey · · Score: 1

      Remember them, I still have a HUGE pile of them (all overwritten of course). Not to mention all the other ISP's that spammed me over the years. Those things are probably collectors items now.

  29. This isn't a good thing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can just see that sometime in the short future you will get a software disk that requires a CD Burner, although it isn't a CDR. You stick it in your CD Burner, the software installs, and while it does so it records exact hardware information about your computer to the install disk, thus making sure you cannot install it on any other computer.

    It will most likely not be too hard to get around this copy protection, but it still will surprise the first John Doe computer user who cannot explain why he cannot reinstall his software after doing a few computer upgrades...

  30. Copy of article by ChaseTec · · Score: 1, Informative

    Optical Disc Corporation announces industry technology breakthrough -- CDR-ROM!
    Wednesday, 26 February 2003

    Optical Disc Corporation (ODC), a leader in optical disc mastering systems, today announced the introduction of its CDR-ROM(TM) disc. This revolutionary new product provides many new possibilities for digital content delivery, not previously possible.
    ODC's CDR-ROM (patents pending), combines CD-R and CD-ROM on the same disc using its advanced mastering technology. The CDR-ROM is a standard size 12 cm disc that provides a pre-recorded ROM area and a writable CD-R area on the same disc. Although the format has been published for years, available manufacturing technology has limited the ability to record on standard CD-R writers worldwide. ODC's advanced technology provides a breakthrough, allowing the writable portion of the CDR-ROM to be recorded by the content provider, or the end user on their own computer. Either area can be as large or as small as required by the application with a total capacity of up to 700 MB. The CDR-ROM conforms to all specifications of the industry Orange Book standards for hybrid discs and is compatible with standard CD-R writers worldwide.

    The ODC CDR-ROM, with its desktop CD-R writer compatibility, provides the ultimate in application flexibility. The CDR-ROM opens a world of opportunities for new applications such as, Anti Piracy/Copy Protection, Enhanced Data Security, Direct Marketing with mail-merge, and unlimited other software applications.

    "The major challenge in CDR-ROM disc manufacturing has been the requirement to produce a stamper with widely varying pit and groove geometries from the same master. This has proven very difficult to do with photoresist mastering, which is why this type of disc has not yet been readily available. ODC is uniquely capable of readily producing CDR-ROM masters, stamper and replicas because of the tremendous flexibility in ODC's Dye Polymer Mastering process," states Richard Wilkinson, President and CEO of Optical Disc Corporation. This capability has been demonstrated within the last year and is ready to be placed into pilot production. Major software companies and copy protection companies such as Macrovision Corporation (Nasdaq:MVSN - News) and Smarte Solutions have expressed a keen desire to develop applications for the CDR-ROM.

    ODC is now taking orders for the CDR-ROM, which is manufactured at ODC's headquarters facilities in Santa Fe Springs, California. ODC also plans to license the CDR-ROM technology to other manufacturers.

    For More Information

    Optical Disc Corporation is a leading and the world's only remaining independent supplier of mastering systems for CD, DVD, and other optical disc formats, and has been in the business for over 20 years. The company provides a complete line of high-quality optical disc mastering equipment to CD and DVD manufacturers worldwide. Optical Disc Corporation's corporate headquarters is located at 12150 Mora Drive, Santa Fe Springs, California 90670 USA; tel. +1.562.946.3050, fax +1.562.946.6030, http://www.optical-disc.com. ODC maintains regional sales and customer support facilities in Europe/Amsterdam, tel. +31.36.546.3095, fax. +31.36.546.3074; Asia-Pacific/Hong Kong, tel. +852.2541.1732, fax. 852.2541.1766.

    --
    My Hello World is 512 bytes. But it's also a valid Fat12 boot sector, Fat12 file reader, and Pmode routine.
  31. Commercials? by 4volt · · Score: 1

    sounds like an good way to put commericals at the begining of music cd-r's, or video at the begining of vcd's that you can't get around.

    1. Re:Commercials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sshh !!

  32. Great for copy protection. by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 5, Interesting
    During the installation, the install program writes your processor's serial number (or soon your TCPA ID) to the CDRR. You probably don't want to "borrow" that CD to anyone anymore.

    Or, you could limit how many times a program can be installed ... endless possibilities.

    --
    Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    1. Re:Great for copy protection. by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 1


      Yeah, but only if the CD is in your CD-Burner.

      Eventually everyone will have one, but for now, many people still only have CD-ROMs. Corporations are tricksy, but I don't think even MS can shift the frequency/intensity of your CD-ROM's laser! But then again, Longhorn...

    2. Re:Great for copy protection. by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      You also don't want your CPU heatsink to fall off, thus causing your CPU to splat its guts out the side.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    3. Re:Great for copy protection. by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      I don't see it being much use for copy protection as most is just bypassed by pirates by cracking the actual disc checks.

      Most likely, the use relating to copy protection will be to eliminate the hassle of the end user having to connect to a clearinghouse to authorize software opon reinstallation.

      For example, you'd install Windows XP and it would connect to Microsoft and burn your authorization code to the CD. If you gave away/copied the CD, it would say "Windows XP Licenced to Bob Pirate, code 4125-35221-53532-2312*, etc." On subsequent reinstalls, you wouldn't need to connect to activate the software.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    4. Re:Great for copy protection. by Khalidz0r · · Score: 1

      That's not hard to play with, they can simply "require" you to have a CD burner to run the program .. And that's even worse.

      --
      "What you 'seek' is what you get!"
    5. Re:Great for copy protection. by Hanji · · Score: 1

      Microsoft would never go for a scheme like that, it seems, as it would mean that they could not implement any sort of DRM via the online registration (i.e. have windows lock itself down if this copy has been registered before)..

      --
      A Minesweeper clone that doesn't suck
    6. Re:Great for copy protection. by StriderA · · Score: 1

      No-CD Keys would render that useless...

      Also, any data burned to a cd can be deleted by burning over it....

      --
      "When will this FP stuff stop?" "After the great growing..." "The great growing?" "Yea, when people grow up."
    7. Re:Great for copy protection. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least it allow economical distribution of serialized software. Every CD you find packaged with your computer or buy as a software package in the shop has a unique ID on it, so the manufacturer can easily identify the customer who put it on the Warez site.
      Now, all CDs are stamped equal and the serialnumber is provided on a piece of paper or sticker, which of course limits the size of the number and has other limitations. These are removed with such a CD.

    8. Re:Great for copy protection. by pknoll · · Score: 1
      In that case, I'd just use a normal CD-ROM drive (or DVD-ROM) to install it.

      If the device can't write, it can't update the disc...

  33. Better Yet CD-RW's by nexusone · · Score: 1

    If company's like AOL sent out there software on CD-RW's then instead of just plan CD's.
    Think of all the waste that could be stopped, people would not just throw away the disk but recycle them by earseing the old data off them.

    Now a CDR-ROM or a RW could also store software patchs for the software on the disk, instead of having to use a second CDR.

    --
    Wise men speak because they have something to say, Fools because they have to say something!!!!
    1. Re:Better Yet CD-RW's by greywire · · Score: 1

      If AOL sent out their cd's on CD-RW it would effectively eliminate the market for selling CD-RW's. :)

      --
      -- Senior Software Engineer, Attorney appearance services, locallawyerapp.com.
    2. Re:Better Yet CD-RW's by Catnapster · · Score: 1

      Only if AOL makes the CD-RWs themselves, they have to come from somewhere, don't they?

      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
  34. Maybe not by pardasaniman · · Score: 1

    I could see this as a big promo. You can add what you like to a free CDr, but whn you put it in the drive, a wonderful pop-up ad comes up from the beauty of AutoRun. Of course, those you use REAL OS's need not fear. :->

    1. Re:Maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, those you use REAL OS's need not fear. :->

      Right. You'll be promptly locked out.

    2. Re:Maybe not by johny_qst · · Score: 1

      Or anyone smart enough to hold down the shift key while the disk spins up.

      --
      Fnord.sig
  35. How is this different than multi-session? by SirSlud · · Score: 1

    The site is slashdotted and equiring minds want to know ...

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
    1. Re:How is this different than multi-session? by Xerithane · · Score: 2, Informative

      How is this different than multi-session? The site is slashdotted and equiring minds want to know ...

      It's a disc that is divided into two segments. One segment is your standard ROM disc, that sounds like it will be stamped using normal duplication methods. The remainder of the disc is to be surfaced as a CD-R, allowing people to burn information on there.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  36. Possible use of the CD's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Some companies might take the opportunity to sell them just like CD-R's but cheaper because every CD would have a small ad burned on it. So every time you burn to the CD or even look at the CD, you'll see the company's logo, play a little jingle or something.

  37. There are some possible applications by tandr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is actually semi-good thing.

    Imagine game that you dont need to install, it plays off the CD itself and writes save games there. Bad thing about it -- games could become "one time playable" only.

    Or even worse -- one time installable software, that writes some reg. info to CD itself.

    How about some exams on CD that you pass or not pass and it saves your results directly to CD?

    But again, could be possible to create copy of this CD and do this again, and again, and again... :)

    1. Re:There are some possible applications by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The reason (almost) all games have to have a harddrive footprint has nothing to do with saving games, and everything to do with the latency and transfer rates of CD-ROM drives.

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    2. Re:There are some possible applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention not EVERYONE has a CD-R drive...

  38. Updatable apps by binaryDigit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can't seem to get to the site (/.'ed?) but one use that springs to mind is being able to update the data for some application. Right now you purchase some app that might come on a cd, lets say a mapping app. When you want to install updated data, you either get a new cd, or you download, but you can't have the updated stuff with the cd, since it's still on the machine you downloaded. With this, you could download and burn the update and still have everything together.

    Another app could be a way to distribute homework to students. The homework/text is on the stamped portion. As the students do their homework, it can be burnt on the cd. At the end of the year you have a permanent record of the class. You could extend this to storing markup information (bookmarks, notes, etc) and adding supplemantal info as well.

    1. Re:Updatable apps by $$$$$exyGal · · Score: 1
      ... but you can't have the updated stuff with the cd, since it's still on the machine you downloaded.

      Those are great ideas... but a lot of companies would rather just sell you a new CD ;-).

      --sex

      --
      Very popular slashdot journal for adul
    2. Re:Updatable apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when the CD fails, so do you?

    3. Re:Updatable apps by SUB7IME · · Score: 1

      That idea is very tenable and useful. However, I would argue against this as a potential use, at least in universities, because most universities have central servers, to which the students can write data. These servers, in a RAID or similar configuration, would have a smaller chance of failure than a CD-ROM.

  39. Consoles by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    I'd love to see the next gen of consoles use this, or even better, caddy/cartridge based hybrids with embedded flash memory chips... The unscratchability of a cartridge, the capacity of DVD, with built in save features.

    I doubt it though, they make a KILLING on replacement discs and memory cards.

    I read about something like this, but with a write once capability. Pretty tight copy protection if you can write users configuration data to the disc and then lock it.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Consoles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has already been done. It's called the Sega Saturn. Everything you mention minus the DVD.

  40. Good for Canadians... by Abcd1234 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Possibly, anyway. We pay a levy here on blank CDRs. BUT, they must be blank. SO, with something like this, you might be able to conveniently skirt said levies, with a small reduction in capacity.

    1. Re:Good for Canadians... by aridhol · · Score: 1

      I wonder how blank it would have to be to work? Could you just have a single file that says "Blank-media levies suck. Go to http://www.ccfda.ca/ for more info"? Or would they decide that it's still predominantly blank media?

      --
      I can't say that I don't give a fuck. I've just run out of fuck to give.
    2. Re:Good for Canadians... by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      That's a really good question... it would be worth checking out the legislation to see how the law distinguishes between blank and non-blank media. Or maybe the law proscribes levies based on the intended use of the media (I wouldn't be surprised if this was the case). Still, something to think about...

    3. Re:Good for Canadians... by GoRK · · Score: 1

      If this becomes the case, then you could probably successfully lobby that CD-R's themselves aren't actually blank - they contain ATIP data that tells the drive stuff like the manufacturer, the disc type, the maximum write speed (I dont know if maximum write speed is in the CD-R/RW ATIP spec, but it is in all the DVD recording specs), etc.

      ~GoRK

    4. Re:Good for Canadians... by aridhol · · Score: 1

      Nope. If I use a CD-ROM to distribute my resume and code samples, I still get burnt by the media levy, even though I'm not distributing music. So there's no exceptions for intended media use.

      --
      I can't say that I don't give a fuck. I've just run out of fuck to give.
    5. Re:Good for Canadians... by OneFix · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem with this is that this new format will no doubt be more expensive to produce than CD-R and most likely CD-RW media...the question is...will it be cheaper without levies than your CD-Rs with the levies???

    6. Re:Good for Canadians... by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      But you didn't manufacture the CDR. By the time you burn your resume on it, you've already bought it and paid the levy.

      I think question is: What if the manufacturer put something on the CDR, before the it ever changed hands?

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    7. Re:Good for Canadians... by litui · · Score: 1

      After having a look at the laws on this a while back, I would venture a good ol' IANAL guess that if there were a track of music on the disc already it would be tax exempt. I thought of this same idea at the time, myself... mostly in relation to the levy on the blank hard drives included in portable music players. If the manufacturer formatted them and included tracks they would certainly be exempt from the levy.

      --
      I send you this message in order to have your advice.
  41. I use old AOL floppies as coasters! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have wrapped them in clear plastic wrap top keep the stickers in good shape. They really are a hoot when serving beverages at parties.

    Now that's geekdom.

    By the way, I also found a stack of punch cards recently. Don't know what I'll do with them, though.

    1. Re:I use old AOL floppies as coasters! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does your wife think of your taste in décor?

  42. Save HD space with games by xRelisH · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think this is a great idea. If one could extend this idea into maybe a CDRW-ROM allowing a lot of writes or perhaps even a DVDRW-ROM. This way for game consoles, you can actually save your game without the need of a Hard Drive (XBox) or a memory card. This might bring back some of the concepts that were promised by the cancelled (in US) N64 DD, allowing a game to be very changeable. Imagine an RPG like this, like where a lot more of the scenery can change, you slash your sword along a wall, turn off the console, load it up again the next day and you'll still see a little mark on that same wall. More so, in an RPG like game, there would be even more interactivity, like where you can change entire landscapes with your "magical" powers. This is something that would be hard to do on a game console, even with an 8 gig HD which I doubt developers would want to be half full because of one game. I'm curious how expensive this technology would be though.

  43. Send AOL cd's back? by dance2die · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh yeah, what is that place where you could donate AOL cd's too? he he he I need URL

    --
    buffering...
    1. Re:Send AOL cd's back? by BadluckShleprock · · Score: 1

      Send them to http://nomoreaolcds.com/ I send a few back every couple of weeks and they need all that you have. I guess people would rather have them in a landfill or use them as shiny coasters.

      --


      ------
      There's a fine line between cuddling and holding someone down so they can't get away.
  44. Virus-Orama! by blueZhift · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This sounds like a good way to spread viruses. Imagine all of those AOL CDR-ROMs lying around in your building's mail lobby being picked up and loaded with trojan horses say and then put back in the lobby all with friendly AOL logos already on them. Even if they had been originally shrink wrapped, most users who 'd be interested in signing up for AOL wouldn't think twice about sticking the CD into their PC and running it.

  45. Slashdotted by Target+Drone · · Score: 1
    NOTE: This came from google news so it might not be the same

    Business Editors
    DCD Expo 2003

    SAN JOSE, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Feb. 26, 2003--Optical Disc Corporation (ODC), a leader in optical disc mastering systems, today announced the introduction of its CDR-ROM(TM) disc. This revolutionary new product provides many new possibilities for digital content delivery, not previously possible.

    ODC's CDR-ROM (patents pending), combines CD-R and CD-ROM on the same disc using its advanced mastering technology. The CDR-ROM is a standard size 12 cm disc that provides a pre-recorded ROM area and a writable CD-R area on the same disc. Although the format has been published for years, available manufacturing technology has limited the ability to record on standard CD-R writers worldwide. ODC's advanced technology provides a breakthrough, allowing the writable portion of the CDR-ROM to be recorded by the content provider, or the end user on their own computer. Either area can be as large or as small as required by the application with a total capacity of up to 700 MB. The CDR-ROM conforms to all specifications of the industry Orange Book standards for hybrid discs and is compatible with standard CD-R writers worldwide.

    The ODC CDR-ROM, with its desktop CD-R writer compatibility, provides the ultimate in application flexibility. The CDR-ROM opens a world of opportunities for new applications such as, Anti Piracy/Copy Protection, Enhanced Data Security, Direct Marketing with mail-merge, and unlimited other software applications.

    "The major challenge in CDR-ROM disc manufacturing has been the requirement to produce a stamper with widely varying pit and groove geometries from the same master. This has proven very difficult to do with photoresist mastering, which is why this type of disc has not yet been readily available. ODC is uniquely capable of readily producing CDR-ROM masters, stamper and replicas because of the tremendous flexibility in ODC's Dye Polymer Mastering process," states Richard Wilkinson, President and CEO of Optical Disc Corporation. This capability has been demonstrated within the last year and is ready to be placed into pilot production. Major software companies and copy protection companies such as Macrovision Corporation (Nasdaq:MVSN) and Smarte Solutions have expressed a keen desire to develop applications for the CDR-ROM.

    ODC is now taking orders for the CDR-ROM, which is manufactured at ODC's headquarters facilities in Santa Fe Springs, California. ODC also plans to license the CDR-ROM technology to other manufacturers.

    For More Information

    Optical Disc Corporation is a leading and the world's only remaining independent supplier of mastering systems for CD, DVD, and other optical disc formats, and has been in the business for over 20 years. The company provides a complete line of high-quality optical disc mastering equipment to CD and DVD manufacturers worldwide. Optical Disc Corporation's corporate headquarters is located at 12150 Mora Drive, Santa Fe Springs, California 90670 USA; tel. +1.562.946.3050, fax +1.562.946.6030, http://www.optical-disc.com. ODC maintains regional sales and customer support facilities in Europe/Amsterdam, tel. +31.36.546.3095, fax. +31.36.546.3074; Asia-Pacific/Hong Kong, tel. +852.2541.1732, fax. 852.2541.1766.

  46. Perfect for Knoppix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This type of CD would be perfect for Knoppix, 500M for the operating system, and 200M to store settings, files and email. It would mean the first truly portable fully featured OS.

  47. First Application: Microsoft by jmenezes · · Score: 1

    If this does come to fruition in the marketplace, most likely the first company to make use of this would be M$. while they may not innovate on technology, they do innovate on ways to screw the consumer, and this is an excellent example.
    Say MS releases Windows 2004 next year.
    instead of sending out a regular CD like they usually do, they'll send out one of these CDs, which upon installation will write a small portion of information to the CD, with your computer's hardware info and specs on it. After that point, it might be restricted to installing ONLY on a computer with those specs, and additionally, only a limited # of times, at which point you would have to go and buy a new copy of windows...

    --
    Stop over-analyzing your analizations
    1. Re:First Application: Microsoft by the_raptor · · Score: 1

      Yeah and it would take the pirates all of two days to break.

      James

      --

      ========
      CINC, 4th Penguin Legion
    2. Re:First Application: Microsoft by da2 · · Score: 1

      could you not just put it in a CDROM drive, that way writing to it would be close to if not totally impossible

    3. Re:First Application: Microsoft by Dodger-NZL · · Score: 1

      Only if you install the software using a CD-RW Drive.

    4. Re:First Application: Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could make it refuse to install off of anything but a CDRW or CDR drive....

    5. Re:First Application: Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could make it refuse to install off of anything but a CDRW or CDR drive....

  48. Here's why it won't work by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I can't get to the article because it's already /.ed, but even if this idea is good, it is out of touch with reality. The manufacturing process in creating a silver CD is pretty straight forward. You make a master CD, you press silver copies of it and voila! You've got a *cheap* mass produced CD.

    The problem with this idea is that you can't mass produce CDs like this with a writable area for the consumer. For one, it's a totally different process to make the media. It's also more expensive. Not only that, why should I use this monster? I can't erase what's already in the session. It's like using those preformatted Zip disks with that 50ways.exe and not being able to delete it. Oh, so I can store a few documents amongst the hundreds of megs of AOL crap on the CD. Talk about a autorun nightmare...

    You're also rising the cost of manufacturing disks. Eh, I guess you could burn the CD roms by hand, but that would take forever even on a mass produced scale. You end up looking like some pirate operation. Plus how do I know the CD hasn't be adulterated somehow? At least with a silver CD I know that if it's fake, they went to a lot of effort to get a facility to make it. Gold, Green, or Black CDs can be made by anyone.

    Eh, why bother? Just buy blank CDs. They're cheap enough and you know what you're getting. You're also putting only what you want on them.

  49. Potential use.... by nfg05 · · Score: 1

    Ahhh yes, just imagine how easy it will be to get any keylogging software/virus/trojan/worm onto a gullible user's computer if it can be passed off as a legitimate game/piece of software/whatever. I mean come on, if passing some malicious code off as nude anna kournikova pictures has been moderately succesful, surely some people are dumb enough to put a virus lurking in the recordable part of a seemingly legitimate game CD onto their computer. No, wait.... better yet I could even record whatever i want onto the boot sector of the disc and it would still seem to the casual user like any other game/software CD. Brilliant! (joking, joking i know there is no boot sector on CDs. pointing this out will only make you look stupid. thank you.)

  50. CDR-ROM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think it is a great idea. You could have an OS boot, probe hardware, write optimizations to cd.
    Or save user specific information.
    This OS could be for a game or could be for some sort of appliance. Maybe game console, TIVO type thing.
    Not good at talking to large group forgive me.

  51. I don't like the idea ... by Khalidz0r · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wouldn't this idea make it possible for people to abuse AOL's name and give out the CD again (some way or another) with additional malecious programs. This would easily trick many people into installing them and then the blame would go into the CDR-ROM producer (AOL in this case).

    I always believed the inability to write over a distributed CD coming from a kind of trusted company is a good idea because it disallows such kinds of faking.

    Khalid

    --
    "What you 'seek' is what you get!"
    1. Re:I don't like the idea ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What world are you in?
      In the one I am in, there are enough AOL disks for everyone to be buried in them. No need to borrow them lol

    2. Re:I don't like the idea ... by Khalidz0r · · Score: 1

      That might apply to AOL, but then if others start using the idea it'll be a bad thing ..

      More to it, still someone can redistribute AOL disks in a wrong way, you have one, but someone might come and tell you this one is "newer" or "better" or whatever.

      Many computer users can be tricked by this very easily, all it might take is an autorun.ini file that runs a program planting a virus in the PC or something of this kind.

      From the days of old disks, most companies wouldn't make their disks writable for this reason, but then a disk is not like a CD, which people usually trust their contents when it's through a company they trust.

      Khalid

      --
      "What you 'seek' is what you get!"
    3. Re:I don't like the idea ... by Khalidz0r · · Score: 1

      I'm in Earth, dunno where you are :).

      Anyway, I have 2 notes:

      1. It might not simply be AOL doing this, if AOL does it many other companies would follow. And in that case I don't think you have that much disks.

      2. People always have ways to abuse this stuff, you might tell me you have enough of those CD's, but then someone might clame it's a bit different, better, or or or. They might tell you that the CD you have is curropted when you tell them of a problem you're having. Someone might distribute them as valid ... the list goes on.

      3. Even in the old days, normal disks have had edit protection in many cases, and I think that is for this reason, so you cannot *edit* the contents, nonetheless it is more dangerous with CD's which everybody has taken as uneditable, the normal computer user takes time to understand changes, and even then, some people might not get it, it is a dangerous idea and space shouldn't be given for more abuse in my opinion.

      Khalid

      --
      "What you 'seek' is what you get!"
    4. Re:I don't like the idea ... by moncyb · · Score: 1

      I see your point, but can't someone just take a CDR, burn their trojan horse programs on it, somehow produce a label with logos on the top to make it look like a legit CDROM, and pass it on to the victim? The hardest part would be making the label, which for someone with a lot of time on his hands (who else would do this?) would probably take at most a day to get it perfect.

    5. Re:I don't like the idea ... by Khalidz0r · · Score: 1

      Well that is hard, it needs special tools, and costs much money.

      Remember, it is always possible to do something bad, but it shouldn't be made *handy*.

      Khalid

      --
      "What you 'seek' is what you get!"
  52. Overload.. by _marshall · · Score: 4, Funny

    So let me get this straight:

    We've come so far ahead in technology that we now have Recordable Read Only Memory!?

    Maybe I should invest in that frozen hell stock after all..

    1. Re:Overload.. by ReverendRyan · · Score: 1
      We've come so far ahead in technology that we now have Recordable Read Only Memory!?
      We already have EEPROMs: Electrically Eraseable Programmable Read Only Memory. In fact, there's almost certainly one in the computer you used to post (unless its a Mac). Its not as big a leap as you think it is.
    2. Re:Overload.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *beep* *boop* *beep*

      Captain, the clue detector is reading zero.

    3. Re:Overload.. by _marshall · · Score: 1

      You are most certiainly correct. What I sad was mainly for humour purposes though, pointing out that the language we use contradicts itself =P

    4. Re:Overload.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still think the name for EPROMs are unbeatable. (not to mention long predating this sucker) You can only read it, but you can also program it and erase it. This contradictory naming is nothing new, and in fact not as good as past instances.

      And actually, it's probably flash, which is a different technology from EEPROM.

  53. Re:The Ideal Use by misterhaan · · Score: 1
    or, like me, you could refuse to buy any game system newer than my n64, and just keep on saving to cartridges.

    that said, i do have a memory card for my n64 . . .

    --

    track7.org has all kinds of interesting stuff!

  54. Consoles by Arecibe · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I don't see much use for this in the PC market, but it would be wonderful for game consoles, by allowing a disc to save characters and savegames, in addition to the Game itself.

  55. thank godness this came along... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now I can get cheese on my burger with all the money I'll save. are we talking about getting excited over the possibility of obtaining an inferior of version of something we already have to save a few pennies??? count me out!

  56. Not a bad idea! by dasmegabyte · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Tons of people in the computer lab I used to work in would keep AOL floppys to save stuff on, because even though they were totally unreliable they were abundant and free.

    This would be a really good idea for bands jsut starting out. Record a CD with three songs and leave the rest blank, give away free. People burn other stuff on the end, and hear your tracks first. Free advertising marketed to people who might actually dig your sound.

    Of course, you could do the same with recorded commercials...

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
    1. Re:Not a bad idea! by mattkinabrewmindspri · · Score: 1

      Bands can already do that with CD-R discs by just writing their songs as a session and not closing the disc.

    2. Re:Not a bad idea! by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      With the exception that you then have to burn one cd at a time and at a cost of around $.25 for a good disc. Disc printing costs are down to the pennies a disc level and you can have them all pressed at the same time, with a kickass screen print on top basically "for free."

      Generally bands that record on CDR are considered small potatoes (or perfectionists), as it's cheaper when doing 100 discs or more to have them pressed.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    3. Re:Not a bad idea! by mattkinabrewmindspri · · Score: 1
      It may be cheaper to get your band's music printed on normal CD than to burn it yourself to CD-R, but with CDR-ROM being brand new, we don't know how much mass printing will cost yet.

      We can't assume a brand new product will cost less than something that has been on the market before.

  57. AOL will almost definitely use it by Zerbey · · Score: 1

    I expect and anticipate (but not necessarily hope) that AOL will use this Technology, as will plenty of other companies. If the CDR-ROM manufactures have any business sense they'll bundle free CDR-ROM's with their writers that have advertising/free trials for other companies - especially ISP's. The resulting revenue will be very profitable for the manufacture.

    Maybe I shouldn't be telling the Slashdot community this! *quickly jumping on bandwagaon*

  58. DRM Use by 4/3PI*R^3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1) Release CD of Music, Software, etc.
    2) Place in computer and run program
    3) Program reads BIOS, Hardware config, Windows GUI, etc.
    4) Program writes this data to CD-R portion
    5) Use CD on a different machine -- whoops data doesn't match calling "Piracy Police"

    1. Re:DRM Use by moncyb · · Score: 1

      Can also work this way:

      1. Press CD
      2. CD-R burner writes unique ID # on CD
      3. Release CD
      4. User has to connect to internet to register (can't use our product w/o registration!)--company is sent CD's ID code (so they know which CD you have and not to allow reregistration), user's name (so they know who you are), address (for direct marketing), phone number (for telemarketing calls), email (for spam), ss# (for identity fraud), cc# (for credit card fraud), and all this info is also sent to the feds for their TIA program. ;-)
      5. If CD's fingerprint (you need the ID code for the copy-protection to work) is found anywhere it's not supposed to be: call "Piracy Police."
      6. If someone tries to register this CD's ID a second time, call "Piracy Police." Doesn't matter if is same computer. ;-)

      I'm sure they'll be even more imaginative than we are. Maybe they'll use the CDR part for a time bomb. After one year of use, it blows up. Won't it be "fun"!!! ;-)

  59. Evil CDR-ROMs by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It may sound funny, but if AOL started sending out CD's like this I might just start keeping them around."

    Sure, I would grab lots of free AOL CDR-ROMs everytime I saw their display. Use them when I needed to archive away a modest amount of data. What good would that do AOL, to have a few geeks who know better than to use their "service" snarf up all their free media? Strikes me as the last thing they would want.

    The only people who are likely to use these are people who see them as yet another way to impose copy protection and further restrictions on the users. Install and write to the CDR-ROM. Information already written there? Opps, you need to buy another copy of the tax software to use on this computer. What, you say you bought a new computer? -- too bad, but another copy. You say you need to recover your tax data from 2 years ago and the 2 year old version is no longer sold in stores? Too bad, our copy protection prevents you from installing again.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:Evil CDR-ROMs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      beeeeh. not without a burner, they can't.

    2. Re:Evil CDR-ROMs by DwySteve · · Score: 1

      Opps, you need to buy another copy of the tax software to use on this computer. What, you say you bought a new computer? -- too bad, but another copy. You say you need to recover your tax data from 2 years ago and the 2 year old version is no longer sold in stores? Too bad, our copy protection prevents you from installing again.

      The obvious solution to this problem is to use virtual machines and install all of your software there. Then the configuration won't change, and you can use your apps forever without the pirate police getting called.

      I like how a little thought can stomp out almost any DRM scheme, simply, and effectively....

      --
      http://angryee.blogspot.com
    3. Re:Evil CDR-ROMs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What good would that do AOL, to have a few geeks who know better than to use their "service" snarf up all their free media? Strikes me as the last thing they would want.


      That must be why, for a period of about six years from 1992 to around 1998, I never had to buy any floppy disks.

      Every week, I'd get a pile of them in the mail. Some said Compuserve (it was a Good Day when their standard install increased to 2 disks!), some GEnie, while others said Prodigy.

      Most, however, said AOL.

      I'd often get three or four on the same day. In spite of this apparent errant action, they somehow managed to grow a customer base and become the largest media organizatiton in history, while their competitors fizzled and died.

      I suspect that it's exactly what they wanted.
    4. Re:Evil CDR-ROMs by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
      As you pointed out, their competitors, who also sent floppys, fizzled and died. So writeable media doesn't have an apparent advantage. Also note, you got those floppies in the mail; there wasn't a display with them free for the taking at most major retailers in your town. AOL had no other option that floppy disks at the time, short of just anoying people by removing the plastic tab there is no write once floppy technology. When the CDR option became viable they jumped to it and soon started placing the media where anyone who wanted them could take them. I doubt very much if they would switch to an option where people have an incentive to empty their display space of media.

      Actually, I'm very unimpressed by this technology. Anyone who wants to use it could simply write the first session of a multi-session CDR and leave the rest available. Might take a little longer to make tens of thousands of, but there are some repo houses that are up to it and wouold gladly take on the work, likely at a low cost than this hybred CDR-ROM novilty.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  60. Disk and Floppy-less Server! by Black+Perl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This would be great to create a single purpose server (gateway, webserver, whatever). You can boot off of them AND have some permanent storage (for logs, config, etc)! You'd probably still want ramdisk swap and /tmp partition.

    I can think of all kinds of uses for such a CD.

    --
    bp
    1. Re:Disk and Floppy-less Server! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You'd probably still want ramdisk swap and /tmp partition.

      Oh god, I just had the stupidest idea ever: using a CDRW for swap.

    2. Re:Disk and Floppy-less Server! by |<amikaze · · Score: 1

      I dunno. It seems pretty counter-intuitive to use RAM for swapspace too...

  61. I can see the hamfisated DRM attempts now by Sabu+mark · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No doubt companies would try to use the feature for copy protection and/or DRM. Simply write some machine identifier to the disc, and then presto, your software can demand that the user 1) keep the disc in the drive and 2) only run it on the machine that corresponds to the locked-in identifier.

    Of course, for the competent user, this would be about as hard to defeat as the infamous "enhanced CD" scheme that you can defeat with a felt pen. But it would still be annoying and user-hostile. Although that seems to be a consciously decided marketing strategy for the Big Content conglomerates these days.

    --

    What Would Jesus Do
    (for a Klondike bar)?
  62. Canada Rejoices! by FFFish · · Score: 1

    This is going to save our bacon up here in Canada. Our friendly idiots in power are determined to increase the tariffs on recordable media, in an altruistic effort to enrich Celine Dionne.

    The loophole, though, is that the tariffs don't apply to prerecorded media.

    I am quite willing to give up a few bytes of CDR space in the name of saving a buck per CD in purchasing costs.

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    1. Re:Canada Rejoices! by Shrubbman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      CDRs are like 40-50 cents a piece (Canadian!!!), with the levy (well, if you buy in bulk/spindles). I'm not too crazy about the levy myself, but God man its only a few cents per disc, overstating it to such proportions does nothing but breed hysteria.

    2. Re:Canada Rejoices! by FFFish · · Score: 1

      Get informed, bub. They're poised to raise the tariff.

      http://neil.eton.ca/copylevy.shtml

      They're targeting over $2 for DVD-R. Over twenty bucks per GB for hard drives. They even want to shaft us for the memory sticks used in digital cameras.

      And while CDR are fifty cents a pop up here, true enough, they can easily be had for less than FIFTEEN cents in the USA.

      We're taking it up the ass, and for no good reason at all. The monies collected by the levy over the past couple years have never been distributed. WTF?!

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  63. Different demographics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    1) People who would use AOL.
    2) People who actually know how to burn a CD.

    You'd have more success packaging foie gras with Milwaukee's Best.

    1. Re:Different demographics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. My sister in high school, and most of her friends, use AOL. They burn CDR's left, right and sideways. Anecdotal, sure, but it's not THAT hard to burn a CDR.

  64. AOL cds? NOOOOOOO by DrStrange66 · · Score: 3, Funny

    If AOL used this technology getting by AOLS auto-run installation would not be worth getting to any files burned on them.

    1. Re:AOL cds? NOOOOOOO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I know you're making a joke but since it would be a multi-session CDR, everytime you burn a new session it burns a new TOC, simple delete the AOL files in your cd burning software and while they will still be there, they wont be listed in the new TOC.

  65. hehe...we killed it... by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1

    Anyone have a mirror of the article? It be very dead.

    An error occurred on the server when processing the URL. Please contact the system administrator. :)

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  66. Re:The Ideal Use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the game would have to incorporate a limit of times you can save. the good thing about the memory in the cards and cartridges is you can delete and overwrite your previous save file.

    from a media point of view this also limits the space you can have for actual game material on a cd, and putting cd burners in consoles ups the price of said console.

    from a customer point of view, you won't be able to pass around your save files (to and from arcade machines, friends machine, whatever).

    from a developer point of view, you now have to make sure the writer doesn't write in an area that was previously written in, like another save file or even worse part of the game data.

    all this for (in)convenience of not having a memory card? nah.

  67. I have thought about this idea before... by GoRK · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have thought about this idea before, but it's a really half-baked idea. Here's why:

    Manufacutring cost:

    It's more expensive to produce a disc like this than it is to manufacture a blank CDR or a pressed CD-ROM. For any application where this type of thing would be required, it could easily be written during the manufacutring process onto a regular CDR. I would imagine that there is roughly an equivalent cost to producing one of these hybrid discs versus publishing on CD-R to begin with. In addition to this, think about all that would be involved with retooling a plant to be able to manufacture discs with a different ratio of CD-ROM to CD-R, not to mention the additional burdens it's going to place on testing equipment that will have to be able to verify both the pressed disc and the blank section.

    Reduced capacity:

    The CDR-ROM disk will have a reduced capacity compared to a normal pressed CD-ROM or a CD-R because no data will be able to be written at the point at which the two disc types meet. The reduction in capacity would be small, but prevalent.

    Drive compatibility problems:

    Secondly, the huge installed base of CDROM drives out there will not have good compatibility with this kind of a disc. Most drive firmware treats CD-R and CD-ROM media differently to achieve optimum read performance with different kinds of media. When you put this hybrid thing in your 50x cdrom you got three years ago, it's going to spin up to maximum thinking it's a pressed disc then read error all over the fucking place when it hits the CDR section. The onl thing to do is to fake the cdrom into thinking that the disc is a CD-R in its entirety, but then you don't get any of the advantages of having a pressed disc anyway, such as increased read speed without new drives that cater to this special format.

    Software compatibility problems:

    Due to the way ISO9660 works, the table of contents (including the TOC for the data on the pressed section) will likely have to be re-burned by any software that writes to the CD-R section of the disc. Thus, a faulty burn would render the entire disk unreadable by most systems.

    The only good application I can think of for this is for a console game system where you have the luxury of ensuring a uniform set of hardware capabilities between users, and the ability to break standards to accomplish this weird hybrid design stuff. A game could keep save data on the disc or extra game data or something while protecting the game data itself. The media, though, should be CDRW and not CD-R. For those of you who remember, think about the dreamcast's data format -- use some kind of DVD format for the "outer ring" of game data, and use CDRW for the inner ring of PC/CDROM compatibility. You could pop your Xbox2 game into your PC to download new levels or whatever. Unfortunately, internal storage, and fast network connections inside of future (and some present) game consoles would render this idea pretty pointless also.

    ~GoRK

    1. Re:I have thought about this idea before... by spazoid12 · · Score: 1

      Manufacutring cost
      How much more expensive? 1 cent per piece? 99 cents per piece? It'll be a very small additional cost. There is no retooling needed. Anyways, doesn't matter. Some folks interested in this are content providers hoping for DRM. Including software vendors using an installer that marks the CD so that the install is limited after the first time.

      Reduced capacity
      That's not a concern, either. I remember years ago getting Apple Dev Network CDs where Apple included bonus music on the data CDs (you didn't know this until you popped the data CD into your car player). I thought it was kinda cool and for a while would burn my CDs in mixed-mode...no real reason, just being spaztic. Anyways, I wasn't worried about reduced capacity then. I wouldn't be worried about it here. CDs are used for convenience, not space. Take a look at the next Reader Rabbit CD you buy for your kids (or yourself?). Even with AOL and other crap bundled onto it we're talking well under 30mb used. Anyone worried about the waste? If "The Learning Company" thought they could prevent even just some piracy by using 1 byte of that wasted 610mb of space for an additional 1 cent of cost...why not? The only why-not is they have to hope that most of their target audience has a CDR drive.

      Drive compatibility problems
      There is no issue here. No firmware problems. A driver update wouldn't even be necessary.

      Software compatibility problems
      Who ever said the entire disk is ISO9660? Yet another non-issue. There are many ways to mix discs. I guess you haven't tried it.

      The only good application I can think of ...
      If that's where your imagination on this topic ends, then I seriously doubt your opening sentence:
      I have thought about this idea before...

    2. Re:I have thought about this idea before... by adolf · · Score: 1

      Manufacturing cost:

      Marginal. Current CD-R blanks are injection-molded or stamped with a nice spiral groove. They are then coated with dye, covered in aluminum, and sprayed with laquer. Four steps.

      Just like...mass-produced music and software CDs are injection-molded or stamped with a nice spiral groove, plus pits containing data. They are then covered in aluminum, and sprayed with laquer. Three steps.

      It doesn't take a rocket scientist to make a mold that has the first session of a multi-session disc, followed by an empty groove. Dye it, plate it, and paint it. Four steps.

      You suggest using a fifth step to burn the requisite data onto a conventional CD-R. I'd like to suggest that this is impractical and expensive, and that you might want to think about it for awhile longer.

      Capacity:

      So what? It's free capacity, anyway. Would you rather have precisely nil free space, as is now the case?

      Compatibility:

      It will look like a multi-session CD-R. It will feel like a multi-session CD-R. It will act like a multi-session CD-R. This stuff has been documented and stable since sometime in the early 90s.

      Kodak does it with their current line of PictureCD products in the 1-Hour Photo nearest you, on commodity hardware just like you have at home. They come from Kodak with the program data already on the disc, and the lab adds a pile of JPEGs.

      They did it in the early 90s, too, with their CD-R-based PhotoCD line. Old hat, this.

      Software compatibility:

      Well, sure: CD-RW would be nice, and expensive. But since most "software" issues with burning are the result of idiots hitting "cancel" and buffer underruns, I submit the following:

      1) I don't know of any burning software in common use which allows one to make a bad burn. Yeah, it's easy with mkisofs|cdrecord, but the commandline junkies using those tools directly are generally sufficiently clued as to be able to prevent this sort of badness from occuring.

      2) Idiots of the sort who think they can "cancel" a one-time burn are used to being fucked over, in all matters of life. Such a format will not help them become less stupid, nor will it help them win the lottery or have sex with a beautiful woman. Oh well.

      3) Burnproof and its non-Sanyo ilk put the buffer-underrun issue to bed some time ago.

      4) If trashed TOCs ever really becomes a legitimate issue, a market for software to repair or restore such discs will surface. Some bright young lad from Idaho will make a few bucks selling shareware licenses for it to supplement his potato-digging income, before Roxio decides to have their stab at it.

      And: consoles? With burners? That'll be the day...

  68. Great for hiding porn! by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 4, Funny

    No one wants to touch an AOL cd. ewww.

    1. Re:Great for hiding porn! by Tingler · · Score: 1

      "If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier...just as long as I'm the dictator..." --George W. Bush

      Hey Jonny, do you have a source for the quote in your sig?

    2. Re:Great for hiding porn! by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 1

      Sure:

      http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0012/18/nd.01.htm l

      Its in the transcript.

      You can also do a google search for the quote.

  69. Re:Not that new [but the wrong example] by specht · · Score: 1
    You are right that this idea is nothing new, and you also picked the right company, but the wrong product: The PhotoCD is just a CDR, no hybrid. Kodak does however have the PictureCD, which contains lower resolution images than a PhotoCD, but in addition to the images (which are written to the CDR portion of the disk), you also get some software to manipulate/display/print your images. This software is on the CD portion of this CD-PROM.


    Unfortunately, Kodak does not seem to have information about this technology on their web site anymore. The only thing I was able to find is this discontinuation notice.

  70. I can see it now... by japhar81 · · Score: 1

    All of a sudden, those old ten dollar cd-roms become THE pirating tool. Everyone should stock up, the value will skyrocket!!!

    Incidentally, I have about 60 in my basement. Will sell for the low-low price of $500 each!

  71. already can be done by dj_paulgibbs · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If you burn a CD using a package such as Nero, and do not "close" the CD, you can use it as a floppy disk - i've rewritten to such a "write-once" media fourty times before the disc failed on me.

  72. Re:The Ideal Use by outsider007 · · Score: 1

    newer systems have memory packs that plug into the joysticks. one good thing about doing it this way is that a lot of people rent games before deciding to buy them so the save info would still be there even tho it's a different cd.

    --
    If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
  73. Why? by Myuu · · Score: 1

    That would actually be a great idea for AOL, I remember back in the 6th grade I would just use AOL floppies to back up my info; everyone did. We were basically walking adverts for AOL.

    --

    forget it.
  74. Re:Sad News ... Fred Rodgers dead at 74 by noitalever · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    especially considering all the OTHER false news they print...

    Shawn

  75. Re:EBAY is DOWN!!! by noitalever · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Thank you for that inspirational message, had I but a handful of mod points, I would send you to Karma heaven...

  76. [OT] Re:Not that new by glitch_ · · Score: 1

    What is that file that is displayed in your .sig?

    1. Re:[OT] Re:Not that new by necromaedian · · Score: 1

      a virus scanner apparently

  77. Multisession by Pupp3tM · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe it isn't the same because part of the CDR-ROM is actually cut, but isn't this the same idea in principle as is behind multisession CDRs? Can't write over the part that's already written, but you can write on the rest of the disc.

    --------------------

    --
    "Time is an illusion.
    Lunchtime doubly so."
    -Douglas Adams

    David Borowitz
  78. Wife? yea right by mrnick · · Score: 1

    *lol*

    --

    Encryption: I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend your right to encrypt it...
    1. Re:Wife? yea right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dream of one day meeting a nerd girl.

  79. LINK TO MIRROR by iosmart · · Score: 0

    wee, i was finally able to connect and download the page. here it is... http://www.pchopper.com/mirror/3566.html

  80. DVDR-ROM: Nifty commentaries? by the_truk_stop · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I would think that one of the best uses of a technology like this would be DVD movies with personalized commentaries.

    Then people like me could host "Mystery Science Theater"-esque parties where we make fun of the movie. Loads of laughs, and the memories would last indefinitely!

  81. Re:The Ideal Use by misterhaan · · Score: 1

    that would be why i have the memory card for the n64. my games let me copy stuff from the cartridge to the card and then i can load it up on a friend's system or something.

    --

    track7.org has all kinds of interesting stuff!

  82. additional mirror by iosmart · · Score: 0

    if you go to http://www.optical-disc.com and click on the newsflash at the bottom, it'll take you to another mirror

  83. More info from the manufacturer... by GoRK · · Score: 3, Informative

    More info can be found on the manufacturer's site here:

    http://www.optical-disc.com/CDR_ROM.htm

    ~GoRK

  84. It would be best if AOL just sent me blank media. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I miss floppies. Never have any nowadays.

    PS- AOL, love the little tins. Keep those coming, too.

  85. A positive use... by BHS_Turf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have read most of the comments, and they all seem to tend toward the negative uses, so I am going to offer a counter-example. MoviX. You could mass-produce a bootable cd that would be capable of playing any movie or mp3/ogg file(s) you happened to burn onto it.

    I wouldn't mind a spindle of these.

    -bhs

  86. Good Plan, But You Forgot A Step! by Myriad · · Score: 3, Funny
    1) Release CD of Music, Software, etc.
    2) Place in computer and run program
    3) Program reads BIOS, Hardware config, Windows GUI, etc.
    4) Program writes this data to CD-R portion
    5) Use CD on a different machine -- whoops data doesn't match calling "Piracy Police"

    Good plan, but you forgot the most important part:
    6) Profit!!

    (sorry)

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
    1. Re:Good Plan, But You Forgot A Step! by leonardluen · · Score: 1

      you too are missing a step

      that is supposed to be

      6) ???
      7) Profit!

  87. They didnt count on.. by Rudy+Rodarte · · Score: 1

    my old school LITEON CDROM. Sorry, it can't write to the disc, but it can sure read when it wants to.
    So i guess its back to floppies for me.
    sigh
    Seriously, in terms of DRM, how good is this if we don't have CDR/CDRW/DVD+R+RW-R-RW-RAM etc etc drive on our systems.

  88. Copy Protection??? by Freefall90 · · Score: 1

    I really don't see how this could be used for copy protection purposes. I mean, in order for something like writing a processor serial number to the cd to work, the user would have to be installing the software from a writable drive. True, most machines are coming with CD-R drives built in, but with the rise of DVD burning, how long can we expect the CD-R trend to continue? Certainly not long enough to implement this burning technology as copy protection. Not to mention the multitudes of users out there who STILL don't have a CD burner. What about them? Can they just not install the software?

  89. Why Can't I Do This Already? by Myriad · · Score: 1
    I'm seeing a lot of posts in this thread about how wonderful this would be for things like stand alone servers that can now store updates, etc, etc.

    I agree, there are some good uses here... but for many of the suggested apps, why can't I do this already? I believe it's called a multisession CD.

    I have a CD, I burn a copy and leave the disc open. Vola, I now have a disc I can continue to add data on to: be it maps, server configs, what have you.

    Granted this would mean the functionality for automatically saving a game to disc wouldn't be built into software sold on conventional pressed CD's, but for many of the idea's people are suggesting for these special discs this would work just fine... and be much cheaper.

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
  90. Its already in the old ORANGE BOOK standard! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its already in the old ORANGE BOOK standards from Philips and a thoroughly demonstrated technology.

    This article is silly.

    True, the manuals for the Orange Book cost 5,000 duth guilders (yes 5,000!) but its in there.

    I bought the manuals TWICE in my life. (they are illegal to copy, and each company you work at must by them again).

    If I had them here now I would cite the pages.

  91. What? by LordSkippy · · Score: 2, Funny

    You don't use the flood of AOL discs as a renewable source of drink coasters?

    --
    My karma is in a nose dive
  92. Sony Minidisc by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Shortly after the MD was released, I recall reading about Sony's intention of releasing an MD-Data. This was to have come in three flavours:

    1. WORM - Standard Write Once Read Many-times format for data distribution.
    2. RW - 100% rewritable disks for replacing floppy disks
    3. Hybrid - These disks were mainly read-only, but with a re-writable section. The aim was that you would be able to store savegames on the disc the game came on.

    The MD-Data had a capacity of only 140MB, and I never actually saw one on sale.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    1. Re:Sony Minidisc by fathomDragon · · Score: 1

      it would be interesting if Sony decided to make a portable console, and use the minidisc with the hybrid format, for game save storage.

  93. mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's absolutely right. The CD-PROM technology developed by Kodak for PictureCDs around 1999 seems to be exactly what this claims to be. More info can be found chez Google.

  94. This can already be done!!! by t0ny · · Score: 1
    The poster obviously never used CDR software. If you dont finalize the track data can still be written to the CD.

    Unfortunately, this will not be readable by some older CD-ROMS, but what else is new.

    CDR-ROM. How silly. Is it just me, or is "Ask Slashdot" getting more and more inane?

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    1. Re:This can already be done!!! by c.emmertfoster · · Score: 1

      At least this story has a somewhat broader appeal than "Linux Something Driver Version 1.00032 Released." But it's not just you.

      --
      We can neither love nor pity nor forgive. If you make a slip in handling us you die!
  95. Re:The Ideal Use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, you remind me of me. I can't dig disc-based game machines, I like to KNOW that my N64 will still be working in 10, 20, 30+ years. No lense breaking, scratched-disc problems there!

    Oh, and I've been playing WaveRace 64 waaaaay too much as well. But it's so damn good.

  96. OT: Middle School = 9th? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My school district goes:
    kindergarton - own 'school' 1->5 - elementary 6->9 - middle 10->12 - high school


    Yeah, this is a typical setup these days. When I went through school it was 1-6, 7-8, 9-12

    Actually, the grandparent's questioning of 9th grade being in middle school is kinda puzzling. When it's just 7th & 8th grade it's supposed to be called a Jr. High school. Did he mean that on his planet only 6-8 was Middle School?

    Oh, and even though I went to a Jr. High school by the 7th & 8th rule, they called it a Middle School back then too. Obviously the names aren't strictly enforced.

    1. Re:OT: Middle School = 9th? by packeteer · · Score: 1

      You guys dont know messed up. My district works like this:
      Preschool (-2-K)
      Elementary School (K-4)
      Intermediate School (5-6)
      Middle School (7-8)
      High School (9-12)

      This is assuming you dont go to running start in which case you go to a community college for grades 11-12.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    2. Re:OT: Middle School = 9th? by balloonpup · · Score: 1

      Could be worse. Mine was:

      Elementary school: K-4
      Middle School: 5-6
      Junior High: 7-8
      High: 9-12 (some classes in 11 and 12 are for college credit at the school, some kids go to vocational school for all 4 years, some kids skip out for college after 11th, and some spend many extra years hehehe)

      --
      I sing the doggie electric!
  97. Random CD Writing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can someone tell me why CD-R/RWs can't have data written to it in the same fashion as floppies, or hard drives? I mean things like just adding a few files to the disk, and in the case of RWs, deleting files or modifying existing ones.

    Is there something about the hardware preventing this, or is it just because of the way the iso-9660 filesystem was designed? If the latter, would it be possible to make an alternate CD filesystem (not backwards compatible obviously) that would allow that kind of functionality?

    1. Re:Random CD Writing by TeddyR · · Score: 1

      Nero InCD {which comes with Nero 5.5.x }can do that with CD-RW, CD-MRW, DVD-RW or DVD+RW.

      [other software and OSes can probably also do this...]

      http://www.nero.com/en/index.html#c1004534911820

      --

      --
      Time is on my side
  98. also by Threni · · Score: 1

    this idea was around on cassettes years ago. Prerecorder album one side, blank on the other.

  99. This sounds like... by ewhenn · · Score: 1

    .. a partially filled CD-R. Part is prewritten and guess what? The rest is blank! Novel concept, if it is not full, there is space left!

    On a serious note though, If they made CDRW-ROMS, that would be great for games, no more storing the data on your HD, instead you can have your saves on the game disk itself. Nice if you use different computers, plan to format your HD, etc...

  100. Hm... specialized usage? by HaloZero · · Score: 1

    I could see these being used particularly for version control archiving. Like, storing several progressive versions of the same software on a single CD.

    But that's a single use. There are probably more. But, for day-to-day burning of things, I'd still use CD-(R|RW)s.

    --
    Informatus Technologicus
  101. Doesn't sound funny at all, actually... by Reedo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "It may sound funny, but if AOL started sending out CD's like this I might just start keeping them around."

    Back when AOL used to send out 3.5" floppy discs a lot of people wanted to get as many as possible. They'd format the discs, rip off the label, put their own label on and use it later.

    I remember seeing sites that listed a bunch of methods on how to get more. Thanks to AOL you never had to buy floppys again! But unfortunately, as everyone knows, they switched to CDs and now everyone would rather see less of 'em. If they were rewritable that would probably be a different story for many -- and thus even if CDR-ROM was an option AOL might not do it for this very reason.

  102. Now if AOL would just... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...start using CD-RW media to distribute their product, I might actually start my own AOL disc collection.

  103. Macrovision's interested--good for consoles, too by writertype · · Score: 1

    If you read the press release, it says that copy-protection companies like Macrovision are interested. Frankly, I'm not sure how this would work--there doesn't seem to be any benefit to the user being able to write something to the disc.

    On the other hand, this might be a nice way of transporting files from one system to another. If Nintendo or Sony came out with support for this format, you could place your user files on the disc itself and not have to worry about memory cards. (Probably need a DVD version, though).

  104. What if I don't have a CD Burner?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are all worried about ways to circumvent this copy protection, but what if I just pop the cd into my standard cd-rom!?

    1. Re:What if I don't have a CD Burner?! by Rudy+Rodarte · · Score: 1

      Thats exactly what I'm saying. No CD Writer-Nothing gets written to the CD.
      Could it be used for such things: probably. But then again, people will always find a way around it. Even if that makes standard CDROMS illegal under ye olde DMCA.

  105. Interesting idea by jemenake · · Score: 1

    When you think about what most people probably use CD-R's for (making a copy of MP3's or software to pass around to friends), AOL stands to gain by having their installer getting passed around along with those bootlegs.

    I'll take 10-to-1 odds that the installer is set to auto-run so that the installer runs every time the disk gets inserted... when all you wanted was to get to the damn mp3's.

    In fact, I'll bet that the verbage on the installer will be cleverly phrased to imply that you have to install the software in order to access the other files on the cd.

  106. This is no an overly new concept by Jake+Dodgie · · Score: 1

    When CD-roms first came out Someone came up with the idea of putting magnetic media on the top & a floppy style head in the CD Drive to read it. Mainly for games to record current position & high scores etc. It never flew, I guess because the console makers never picked up on it.

    --
    Drunkeness is an electron free version of virtual reality.
  107. Re:Macrovision's interested--good for consoles, to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it would mean they could more easily write f'd up CDs that won't dupe correctly, even with CloneCD, etc., but somehow still work with whatever is preloaded on to the CD.

  108. Re: yes but... by op51n · · Score: 1

    They're hardly about to release CDRW's. They're not going to want they're portion of the disk to be written over. That would be un-corporate!
    If there was a way to stop you from erasing the first section maybe.
    What I'm thinking though, is that to get a cd you're not interested in but want to use the space on, it would be ever so frustrating if it had an autorun.inf file on there (yea, so turn it off, but if you've just reinstalled and nt got round to it!).

  109. Re:The Ideal Use by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

    "Remember when every saved game on a console game was held right in your cartridge? "

    I vaguely remember that Nintendo was sort of working on something that did that, only their technique was different.

    Dislcaimer: What I'm about to say I read in a rumor section of a magazine, I cannot verify it's authenticity.

    Supposedly, back in the SNES days when Nintendo was working on a CD-ROM addition, they were developing a CD-Caddy which had a small memory chip on it for save games etc. Not only did you have a protected disc (why aren't CD's protected anyway?!) but the chip was the key to preventing bootlegging. If that chip didn't respond properly, or didn't exist, the game wouldn't play.

    I wish that had come out. Not only would that have been an interesting game technology, but imagine today if CD's came in caddies that had a smart media card attached to them as well. If the RAM is fast enough (maybe SM isn't the right memory for that, but bear with me...) it'd be a nice compliment to the CD. Cache maybe? I dunno, I'd have to think about it more.

    Oh the bright side, though, this is not a technology I'd want the RIAA to have.

  110. Custom Index-abel Music CD's by nativeofearth · · Score: 1

    ... would be my dream application for this. Commercial pre-written CDs with extra writable tracks. In a multi-CD music player, (hooked to a pc for input if desired) you could put meta-info on tracks. Not just artist/title or jazz vs. rock but also fast-med-slow, morning vs evening, moody vs happy, etc. and when you removed the CD and replaced it later, the info would still be there and displayable or seekable by the player. As far as I know, some current CD stack players let you input info, (and some is burned on by publisher,) but what you input must be re-input if you change the CD.

  111. Re:Copyright - DRM/DRR by deveco · · Score: 1
    I think some of us remember the programs that came on floppy disks, would install on a machine and then they wrote to to disk, so you could never use them to install again. Some programs that ran off the floppy even just over-wrote themselfs to lock them to the computer/user the first time they ran.

    I read somewhare:
    Those who don't know history are doomed to reapeat it.
    Those who know history are doomed to know it is being repeated.

    DRR: Digital Rights Removeal.

    --
    Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?
  112. Think about applications for games. by carlmenezes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Consider this scenario :

    Games don't use the windows registry at all, or they use temporary registry settings if necessary. All configuration info is kept on the CD.
    The game is essentially playable off the CD. Your saved games go BACK ON the CD. Which is nice. That way you can carry around all your settings in a neat little package whereever you go.
    (If this looks familiar, it's nothing but the Linux concept of keeping configs in files).

    Why would games want to do this?
    1) There is no issue of hard drive space.
    2) The entire game is now portable.
    3) It would be so much more convenient to customers.
    4) It wouldn't cost them more.
    5) They could even take this one step further by creating their own bootable CD thereby eliminating the need for a specific OS, but then...I'm not sure that's a very good idea as it turns a game company into an OS producer too, unless the micro kernel the game runs on is standardised for all games. If you manage that, you've essentially given PC users almost all the convenience of console gaming!

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
    1. Re:Think about applications for games. by srirams · · Score: 1

      all of your ideas presume that game companies actually want to help out consumers, not squeeze every dime out of them that they can. where you see portable games they see piracy. where you see convenience they see piracy. while I agree this would be a cool idea, can you actually imagine EA pausing from chruning out a new copy of madden 2004 in which all the do is change the year, to actually develop this technology.

    2. Re:Think about applications for games. by wizarddc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I also think this making piracy HARDER, not easier, as one of the previous reply'ers says. TO play the game, you need the cd. And you can't just burn a copy, since it's a special cdr rom, that either you can't buy, or it's an exact size, that you wouldn't be able to match. And per the other reply'er, you could have the option of putting stuff on the HD, or even, totally install to the HD, but the cd needs to be in the tray. Since the whole unique cd type comes up, it'd be a decent anti-piracy method, but of course, with enough time/effort/people, anything can be sidestepped.

      --
      Th
    3. Re:Think about applications for games. by sbaker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The games manufacturers could even make the CD-writer try to scribble all over the ROM area so you couldn't copy it onto a writable disk.

      This sounds like an idea that's most useful for console systems. Avoiding the need for a hard disk or a pluggable RAM cartridge for game saves seems like it would be a big win.

      In the PC world, things are more problematic - I wonder whether the market penetration of CD-RW drives (as opposed to just CD-R) is large enough to make this useful for a few years to come? If only 30% of gamers have them, the games manufacturers aren't going to be very interested.

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
    4. Re:Think about applications for games. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then again, just TRY to make a backup in case your disc fucks up.

      You use the disc that much and it's gonna have more scratches than... err something that has lotsa scratche.

    5. Re:Think about applications for games. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [blockquote](If this looks familiar, it's nothing but the Linux concept of keeping configs in files).[/blockquote]
      and i suppose linux also invented the text file?

      btw a lot of windows software uses a .ini file.

      i dont see how i, as a modern game develoepr would want to make my game 'portable': most tend to be going the opposite and using the DMCA to help them. Also, what's wrong with just uploading/emailing/sharing .sav (or whatever) files?

      ANd especially with portability: what's the use of having the config files on a CD when they might be specific to the architecture of a local computer, and thus not portable (eg. graphics setup)?

    6. Re:Think about applications for games. by glindsey · · Score: 1

      This would be an interesting de-evolution of the computer gaming industry. Does anyone else remember the days of the 8088? Some games (Zaxxon was a good example, if I remember correctly) came on bootable floppies that contained their own OS -- no DOS involved. Or, of course, you can go farther back, to C64 and Apple II games that didn't use DOS 3.2 or ProDOS. Of course, bypassing the OS today is a considerably more monumental task; back then, the hardware was more or less standardized, so you'd manipulate it directly. Today, you would need to include all of the various drivers that the OS typically takes care of -- a pretty complicated task for a company that just wants to release a game.

    7. Re:Think about applications for games. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only problem with keeping all the settings on a CD-Rom would be that in Windows, there is no relative path to point to the CD-Rom. This would work much better if microsoft changed the filesystem so that there was a relative path that always pointed to the cdrom, like maybe \\dev\cdrom or \\mount\cdrom :)
      Hopefully it wouldn't be C:\windows\desktop\My Devices\My CD-Rom

  113. Viable Idea - Bootable interface by Bonker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Now imagine this... a custom linux computer interface whittled down to fit in 300 or so megabytes and configured to boot properly and DHCP across a wide array of hardware. The other 400 are for you to store your files and settings for later use. Set it up with a few essentials - text editor, web browser of your choice, various clients, *maybe* some basic compiler tools.

    Take the CD anywhere you chose to and use your own interface/desktop from any PC in the world that will let you have access to the CDROM drive and the reset switch.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:Viable Idea - Bootable interface by Phiu-x · · Score: 0

      "Take the CD anywhere you chose to and use your own interface/desktop from any PC in the world that will let you have access to the CDROM drive and the reset switch."

      You mean cdrw disk right?

      --
      This is a stolen sig.
    2. Re:Viable Idea - Bootable interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ran across a live linux-on-cd distro based off of Debian.

      http://www.knopper.net/knoppix/index-en.html

      Seems to work fine on all 4 desktops and one laptop I've tried... required a bit o' hackery to work on another laptop. I don't blame the distro, I blame Compaq.

      Howtos to 'fig your own. Chop out the other window managers and a few other bits 'n pieces here and there.

      Done.

      Sounds not too hard with much less fantasy, eh?

    3. Re:Viable Idea - Bootable interface by spuke4000 · · Score: 1

      You don't need combo CD-ROM/CD-R disks for this. Just use a CD-RW and you get all the functionality (ie being able to modify/create files) of an HD based system off the CD.

      Just throw Knoppix on a CD-RW and *presto*. This seems to simple, and I'm probably missing something, but I don't see why this couldn't be done...

      --
      This post cannot be rebroadcast without the express written constent of Major League Baseball.
  114. Re:Not a bad idea! Units conversion by sazim · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    OFF-TOPIC

    "Tons of people.."

    Always interesting that people use a mass descripter to indicate a quantity of people.

    1 Ton of people = 13 people (@ 75kg each)

    --
    "Those who don't believe in magic will never find it." - Roald Dahl
  115. Re:The Ideal Use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Problem is, you could only save a certain number of times. You see, CDRs have this minor problem with overwriting data...

  116. Re:What would be better...NINNLE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just think...a full version of Ninnle Linux only takes up about 60 Meg of space on a CDROM...the possibilities are endless!

  117. What a great way to sneak p0rn into the firm by manplusdog · · Score: 1

    It's ok sir, it's just my latest copy of aol

  118. You forget something... by Jezral · · Score: 1

    People here seem to be making a big case out of the DRM uses of such a media...but you forget that such will only work in a CD-R/RW drive.

    And, I haven't seen any such drives currently able to burn and read at the same time, which might be useful for a DRM scheme, or even the one-disc game+savegames suggested.

    But, what about users where the CD drive is a quite normal CD-ROM, or DVD/CD-ROM combo?
    Will the DRM'ed program then deny being installed from such a drive?
    And is there even a big enough market for puttng a label on saying "Can only be installed using a CD-R/RW drive!"?

    All of the above would be required for a DRM scheme to work...

    -- Tino Didriksen / ProjectJJ.dk

  119. Total Cost of Ownership in Corporate Setting by zerus · · Score: 1

    To those of us who have worked in an IT department that services a very large network, this seems like the next generation of installation/recovery cd's that can be tailored to the type of computer necessary. Right now you have to do something like the kickstart configuration in redhat, or the administration kit for windows setups where you have to make the installation specific and then modify the install media, but with this it seems like you could have your generic install data pressed on the cd, then use the rest of it for your install scripts/config files. It seems like it'd reduce the number of CD's an IT guy would have to carry around all the time. Sounds like a good technology, only what will the RIAA say about it and do they take a cut of the profits on this too?

  120. Please don't shoot me, but.... by RealRav · · Score: 1

    These could be used for copy protection on software. Once it is installed something could be written to the CD not allowing it to installed on anything but that(or identical) machine. Of course this could be circumvented, but so can everything.

  121. Game Consoles by detritus. · · Score: 1

    I could see this being useful on game consoles, (or with a similar technology with DVD's) especially with online gaming. While games that are generally released for a game console platform are rigorously tested to be bug free, it may become necessary, especially in an online environment, to directly download and apply patches to the game media. Not to mention the ability to save your game on the game media itself...

    Down the road, it could do away with the need for hard drives (cost) or memory cards (cost, speed and size) in game consoles. I'm not aware of this happening, but if a severe bug was found in a game that doesn't have any online connectivity, it would open up the possibility of going to a store (babbages, best buy, etc.) and having the game patched on the writable portion of the game media, as opposed to issuing a recall and having to re-produce the hundreds of thousands of copies.
    Who knows....

  122. Keeping patches on the install disks by DuSTman31 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I quite like this idea of disks that have rewritable sections of them because they will permit an increased deal of organisational neatness.

    If one were to decide to install an old game from a few years ago you would first have to find the install disk, then the various disks on which you've saved patches you've downloaded. Then perhaps if you use any expansion packs with the game you then have to find that disk too. If you're as untidy as I am this could get to be a real nightmare.

    By the sound of this, however, you could just store the relevant patches and expansions (and maybe even keep a copy of a file containing your preferences) on the writable portion of the software's install disk and have it all in one place. Could be neat.

  123. Re:The Ideal Use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excellent Idea!

    Here's another... storing patches.
    *Cough* Morrowind *Cough*

    It would take a bit of work by the developers but is certainly feasible.

  124. Re:It would be best if AOL just sent me blank medi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I miss floppies. Never have any nowadays.
    Thank you, Viagra (sildenafil citrate).
  125. How optical media is mass-produced by anonymous+loser · · Score: 1
    What's new is that the've developed some faster way to write the disc.

    CDs and DVDs are mass-produced using injection molding. What happens is a bunch of plastic rosin is melted to the correct temperature, then injected into a VERY precise mold that contains the data that's supposed to be on the disc. The plastic then cools very quickly and the disc solifies holding that information. For writable and re-writable optical media, the process is pretty much the same, only the mold doesn't have any tiny grooves in it (well, none that are there by design). From what I understand the process used for the discs in question is sorta like using a partially-etched mold. So, some of the mold contains information, and the rest of it is still blank.

    The manufacturing process for optical media is one of the reasons DVDs should in theory be more expensive than CDs. Because DVDs require a MUCH higher level of precision in both the molds and the plastic required (roughly an order of magnitude) the defect rate for DVDs is still quite high, something like 20%-30% IIRC. The defect rate for CDs is much, much lower...something like 0.01%. So, less wasted plastic and production time, and many more facitilies for doing the production (which means greater competition, and lower production costs) should mean lower prices, but thanks to the RIAA we have price-fixing which usually means it's cheaper to buy a DVD than a CD, even though it's completely counter-intuitive.

  126. halfbakery by po8 · · Score: 1

    This would be a good idea to submit to the halfbakery. Definitely a cool site.

  127. Right... by darkpurpleblob · · Score: 1
    It may sound funny, but if AOL started sending out CD's like this I might just start keeping them around.
    That's just stupid. AOL would never in their right mind send out CDR-ROMs. The recordable part of the CD does nothing to promote their service. Their CDs currently make it easy for people to sign up for their service. Distributing recordable CDs won't get any more people to sign up for AOL. Come on, you aren't going to sign up with them all of a sudden because their freebies suddenly became useful to you.
  128. Re:The Ideal Use by CNERD · · Score: 1

    I thought of this too..I perfer memory cards.

    With memory cards I can rent games and keep my saves, I can share my saves with other people, I am not limited to the amount of saves I can store (I can buy a crap load of memory cards if I want to).

    Personally I see no need for this at all. Most of my cds are installation cds. I have no need to store anything else on them. If I need to store something on a cd, I can burn a CD-R/RW. The only real uses I can see for this is for anti-piracy mesures.

  129. Pigs might fly by darkpurpleblob · · Score: 1
    It may sound funny, but if AOL started sending out CD's like this I might just start keeping them around.
    And if Linux became usable on the desktop, I must just switch from Windows.
  130. Sounds good but... by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Isn't this just like a multi-session CDR?

    You can write the first session, mass-produce them, and consumers can write their own subsequent sessions.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  131. the local paper did this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a few years ago the local newspaper started selling the paper on cdrom and they did the release party at the cybercafe i worked at. the cd's were not closed and we kept about 300 of them and were able to burn about 550megs onto the end. so now i got a bunch of akron beacon journal cd's with movies on them : P

  132. I thought we were to return the AOL cds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the goal was to dump all the AOL cd's back at AOLs main office on the front lawn? Blahh.. Did I miss something?

  133. poor man's excuse by djupedal · · Score: 1

    I never claimed it would happen by noon today. Lighten up.

    You're in a small little world if you think CD's have a future. HP, as an example, just stated that DVD is their new norm, and such hardware will be ubiquitous by end of this year. Yamaha just dropped out of the CD writer market. Pirates in Asia can produce DVD's that sell for under USD$1.00, and still make a profit. The writing is on the cave wall, right where you live...try light. Not my problem if you or someone else can't afford better equipment. Don't get pissed at me for your shortcomings.

  134. Nope by Jerf · · Score: 1

    No, you need to embed your commentary in the stream, not just have it on some random location on the disk.

  135. scary by Splork · · Score: 1

    so software could now require you to have a CD-R drive and write unique computer id info to the CD-R at license verification time so that you can't use it in more than N computers or more than N times?

    as if anyone will buy that shit.

  136. Uh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..New? Groundbreaking?

    No.

    Geez, doesn't anyone read the Linux CD-Burning Howto?

    You can already write once, then write on the remaining part of the disc. Just need to jump through a few hoops during the initial burn. :p

  137. what would be cooler would be CDRW-ROM by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    then a game can write out saved info to the cd and the owner can take it withhim where ever he/she wants withthe game.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  138. Re:The Ideal Use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time to get a PS1. You can get games for $5 now.

    Im looking forward to the release of PS3 so I can get me a PS2...

  139. Bad implications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is bad. Very bad.

    1. You get new game on CDR-ROM.
    2. You install it. During installation procedure, CD is written to by the installation.
    3. CD will no longer install.
    4. No re-install, no backup, no piracy, either.
    5. Profit.

    1. Re:Bad implications by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

      Solution: Don't put it in a CDR drive when you install it. Use a regular cdrom or dvdrom, and things like this won't happen.

    2. Re:Bad implications by HaloZero · · Score: 1

      You have a valid point, but wouldn't the CD drive still need a CD burning laser to write to the disc? I don't know about you, but my burner is used for burning CDs. I still use the good old trusty CD-ROM for reading. Albeit, Mac superdrives and laptop combo drives don't offer that sort of option, but still most computers ship with standard CD-ROM drives.

      --
      Informatus Technologicus
  140. Call me paranoid.... by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

    But this technology could also be used to easily insert serial numbers onto CDs.

  141. Copy protection! by Xel · · Score: 1

    Youre looking at this all wrong.. its a cdR-rom, not a cdRW-rom... imagine buying a piece of software... when you install it, heck, maybe as soon as you put it in, it writes your machine's serial number or MAC address on the disc, so you cant take it home and install it on another machine...

    --
    "Eagles may soar, but weasels dont get sucked into jet engines."
  142. knoppix, livecd etc. by antoinjapan · · Score: 1

    maybe someone mentioned this but knoppix i believe will let u save settings for faster boot ups, if you can save these to the cd then it won't matter what filesystem you are running on your pc.

  143. Re:New way to implement copy protection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those companies that don't mind their customers requiring a CD-RW drive, this type of product could be used to implement a form of copy protection, whereby not all the software is installed on a hard drive, requiring some of the code to be on the CD. The software read from the CD could attempt to erase specific portions of the disk, including areas containing prewritten software and areas that are meant to be erasable. It might take a while for the software to do this, but it would make it difficult to copy this onto a normal CD-RW disk.

    Reminds me a bit of the old mechanism of placing physical holes in floppy disks. This mechanism might be a bit more difficult to crack though. Thoughts?

  144. thats what unclosed multisession disc's are for by daaku · · Score: 1

    i'm sure a much easier way to implement this would be to get windows to read open multisession cd's... that way, there's no physical changes to the methods of production

  145. As a game developer... by daVinci1980 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can point out a big problem with this.

    We desperately want our files off of the CD because it takes TOOOOOOO LOOOOOOOOOONG to load from CD. Hell, if I thought I could get away with it, I'd store my entire game in RAM so it'd be blazing fast.

    --
    I currently have no clever signature witicism to add here.
    1. Re:As a game developer... by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      OK, so copy the files to the hard disk. But if the disk gets wiped or the game moves to a different computer, there is no need for reinstallation and no loss of saved data. The idea still isn't practical for other reasons, however.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  146. WORM!! by Jason1729 · · Score: 0

    The term is WORM...Write Once Read Many.

    1. Re:WORM!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      guess you didn't get the joke.

      who wants to read the damn things any way??

    2. Re:WORM!! by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      The term is WORM...Write Once Read Many.

      You've never heard of write-only memory? Signetics put out a datasheet on a WOM chip once.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    3. Re:WORM!! by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      According to your own link, it was a joke. a CD-R is a WORM drive, not a WOM...WOM means you can never read it. That's the sort of media the RIAA probably uses for their complaints database.

      With an IC chip, the term is OTP; One Time Programmable.

      Jason
      ProfQuotes

    4. Re:WORM!! by You're+All+Wrong · · Score: 1

      Yes it's a joke. It's on you.

      YAW.

      --
      Your head of state is a corrupt weasel, I hope you're happy.
  147. Uh, for you DRM worrywarts by MrEnigma · · Score: 0

    The way I see it, if you guys are worried about people using DRM to hinder people using this...I don't get it. If you're worried about it, play/use it in a normal CD-ROM drive, sure they could add functionality to prevent that...but at least you wouldn't have to be worried about it writing it to it. Plus you'd have to own a cd-rw drive to use it, and most everyone does, but still....

    --
    GeekWares - Buy and Download Today!
  148. That's what I can do by kcb93x · · Score: 1

    UNDER WINDOWS.

    I just tell Easy CD Creator 5 to not finish the CD-R, and I can still write to it later. In fact, I've got a stack of those discs somewhere. That, and I can't even figure out under XP how to have XP finish a CD (no burning software on that one, sadly; it's an emachine)

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  149. I have seen these games. by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    They sell them at Electronics Boutique. I picked up one called Super Smash Bros -- it plays off of the game disc, and saves everything to a handy flash card I can take with me everywhere. Best of all, I don't have to worry about upgrading the OS on my machine -- it boots right off of the game disc!

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  150. Oh.. this is intelligent. by magnwa · · Score: 1

    What IDIOT thought this would be a good idea? JEEZE!

    CDRROM. So when I install the game, if I have a CD Writer/Combo Drive, it writes on the CDR portion that I've installed it, and, oh, by the way, this is my system specs and other such info and here's some other stuff...

    OR!

    Wait.. we could also do this! Limited play games! We could make it so (since it IS CDR-ROM) that our users can only play a game.. oh.. 100 times! Or once they beat the game , they can't play it again! Or we can throw keys onto it and block against copying of anytype.

    Sorry.. I'm not sold on this.

    magnwa

  151. Old News by purduephotog · · Score: 1

    Kodak does this already when you get your picture CD made. This has been out at least as long as that, so make that 2 years?

  152. Microsoft would love it... by Jenolen · · Score: 0

    This would go great with Microsoft's new Product Activation feature in XP... (Oh, I hope I didn't just give them an idea. You know they can't think up their own anyways.) Oh, you just installed a new sound card, please insert your Windows XP CDR-ROM to install drivers. I'm sorry, it looks like you already had a perfectly working sound card. You may have installed a different one to try and pirate this copy of Windows XP. You will need to purchase another copy of Windows or call 1-800-PAY-MSFT and ask to speak to a customer service rep. Have a good day. --- Meanwhile Clippy is going crazy... "Oh, it looks like you are trying to give Microsoft more money. Just type in your credit card number here and I can help you get everything setup."

    --
    Karma is like sex. I can't remember the last time I had either of them.
  153. No, this is 2 years old at least by purduephotog · · Score: 1

    Kodak has been using the stamped image (with the reader software and utilities) to make CDRs for PictureCD. This has been out about 2 years, if I remember correctly when I read about it initially (could be as many as 3.. things blur after awhile).

    So yes, it's actually got some use... and it is practical. Problem is when you update the software you've got a bunch of disks that are quite useless and you can't give to customers.

  154. Re:Viable idea -- OT by balloonpup · · Score: 1

    I received one of those for solstace, and I have to say that it's the most useless thing I've ever had. Making pancakes one at a time is annoying, but what's worse is that the non-stick coating didn't stick to the pan and ended up in my pancakes, and to boot, the way it works is pointless anyway -- you can't tell when the things are ready to flip!

    --
    I sing the doggie electric!
  155. It's my worst fear... by Viceice · · Score: 1

    That they actualy invent this. I've actualy had the idea of a ReWritable CD-ROM/RW Combo Disk for a while, but it's A BaD Thing(TM).. Think Of the implications.

    When anyone ships a CD, The CD-Key is on a piece of paper that you have to type in. but never in the CD as data, thats why a KeyGen will work. This is because when you stamp a CD, you can't change anyhting on it.

    This new CD will take away that limitation. Just Imagine, now M$ will have a way to serialise every copy of windows it ships, on the DATA TRACK ITSELF! This will give them the ability to track where each and every install is.. I dread to think about the privacy implications.

    --
    Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
  156. Not so good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will never be used for games systems or computers, since a cd-r drive is required this would limit a companies userbase, and can not be used in the xbox or ps2 since they use dvd-roms on cd-rw drives or dvd-rw drives

  157. It's a price thing. by LittleBigLui · · Score: 1

    You know why pre-recorded (with music, software, whatever) CDs usually come as CD-ROMs and not as CD-Rs? Because in large quantities it's WAY cheaper to press CD-ROMs than it would be to burn CD-Rs.

    This idea would let companies press CD-ROMs cheaply, while still allowing the user to add some data to that.

    --
    Free as in mason.
  158. Now THAT is a cool idea... by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1
    5) They could even take this one step further by creating their own bootable CD thereby eliminating the need for a specific OS, but then...I'm not sure that's a very good idea as it turns a game company into an OS producer too, unless the micro kernel the game runs on is standardised for all games. If you manage that, you've essentially given PC users almost all the convenience of console gaming!

    Hey, maybe there is a place for Linux in the games market!

    What would it take to come up with a custom kernel and a standard platform for this kind of thing, basically providing existing APIs in a standardized way for game developers? One good hacker, about six cases of Dew, and a three-day weekend?

    I'll ante up the Dew if I can write it off on my taxes... ;o)

  159. Re:Viable Idea - Bootable interface - no good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting


    It wont work in the long term.
    What happens when i want to play that 2 year old game again, but I have a brand spanking new graphics card?
    No drivers. :(

  160. all this sounds like is copy protection built in.. by Linwood · · Score: 1

    just wait til they make your cd-r leave a footprint on the cd after you install it, then it comes up with the message "You cant install this anymore" or "You cannot install this on another machine" after re-formatting.. theres gonna be a boom on the regular CDROM market when this thing happens..

  161. Not being marketed to Joe End-User... by MonTemplar · · Score: 1

    Speaking with my software duplicator's hat on...

    From reading the company spiel about this CDR-ROM, it appears to me that these discs will be either pre-recorded and closed by the manufacturer (serial-numbered discs, slipstream latest service pack and patches, personalisation, etc.), or will be part of a vertical application, where a CD-writer will be part of the end-user requirement, and the writing software will be supplied on the pressed part of the disc.

    Those are the only scenarios that I can think of where this disc would be practical. Using them for general-purpose software is going to be very problematic, as not every potential customer will have access to a CD-writer, and in any case once they have the disc the manufacturer has no real control over what the end-user puts on the recordable part of the disc, no matter what the EULA may say.

    --
    -MT.
  162. Personally, I think it will be trivial by Kjella · · Score: 1

    Before you had CD (read-only)+HDD installation (read/write). We have no problem mapping all that to harddrive now (go check out any warez site), why should CDR-ROM (read-only + read/write) be any more difficult?

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  163. Here we go by TerryAtWork · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Pretty soon the DRM on the cd will check to see if it'll accept what you're writting to it.

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
  164. Re:Copyright - DRM/DRR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember the original Space Hulk did that to me. I used to think it was just a bug.

  165. Patches? by emh0 · · Score: 1
    I doubt very much if this would be any use for storing saved games as some are suggesting - even rewritable CDs have limits on the number of times they can be rewritten (about 1000 times, I think - I may be wrong). Constantly rewriting save files would exceed this limit fairly quickly (especially with things like autosave options).

    Where I can see a use though, is for things like patches - the software developers could release a patch which could simply be written to the original CD, and then when you install the software from then on, any patches could automatically be installed as well.

  166. Novel???? by MouseAnony · · Score: 1

    This idea isn't particularly novel. Anyone with half a brain (e.g. me) has probably thought of it before (well I have anyway). I would assume everyone with a full brain has thought of it before.... So that doesn't leave that many people who haven't thought of it before. The sucessful implementation is novel. However, I wonder now as I always have how successful it'll be. I assume the stamped data portion will still need to have the dye as with the writable layer. The dye will of course be unmarked. The whole metal layer will have to be silver or gold or a combo as with normal CDRs not aluminium. For there 2 reasons, I wonder how well the CDs will work. The dye in the stamped portion could change and this will have negative effects. Assuming they somehow managed to make it so the dye is only needed in the writable portion and the ATIP, things are a bit better. Although I wonder whether the extra reflective metal layer will cause problems.... In any case, it's still going to cost more because of the dye and metal then a normal CD. The process will probably make it cost more then a normal CDR as well. I suspect of course that in large quantities, the replication issue will make them cheaper then burning a lot of normal CDRs and of course, the quality will be somewhat better (although bear in mind what I said before, how much better is circumspect). Although the difference per CD may seem tiny, the quantities were talking about are big enough to make a large difference in the bottom line. Not to mention given that they will mostly be used by the dumb users who will be too stupid to import the previous session and so will 'lose' the data already on the CD.... Not to mention the issue of lawsuits and bad publisity when someone adds stuff to one of these CD and sells it or leave it around and of course when people lose their precious data contained on the cd... No it seems like a bad idea to me which is why me and other half and full brainers out there never bothered to try out the idea...

  167. They make great coasters by ruthven78 · · Score: 1

    I just use them as coasters. I wish they could go back to sending floppy disks, at least those you could just reformat. Or send their AOL disks in CD-RW media so we could overwrite it and make use of all the plastic they waste mass producing my coasters.

  168. Linux Firewall ?! by neomuzic · · Score: 0

    I wonder when I can buy a a linux firewall with half of it on ROM and the rest writable.

    --
    -NM
  169. Copyright - DRM/DRR - Mod up Parent! by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 1

    I think you've hit on a very important point. As long as CD's had to be identical to be mass produced, there were technical restrictions tracking and copy inhibition. This allows all sorts of possibilities for tracking people's use of anything that comes on a CD - music, software, etc.

    --
    It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
  170. How MS (Mega Software Company) could abuse it by hollisross · · Score: 1

    What if these became standard use or required for use of certain large software giants. A software company could burn info onto the writable part during the first use to control the software. Things like:
    * Limit installs to once only
    * Reinstall are limited to a machine with a specific CPU-ID Windows registy key.
    * Burn in the last time that the software can be reinstalled to limit the usage for say 3 months or 1 year.

    Are am I just being paranoid?

  171. More annoying digital rights/content securing by beef3k · · Score: 1

    I can picture it allready. "Sorry but you can only save your document to the digitally signed CD that this product was delivered on".

    Other than that, it's just bollocks. Blank CD's are down to $0.05 any day soon.

  172. For an 8K saved game? by Thag · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking console saved game here, FYI. Primarily because there's nowhere near the same need for this on the PC side.

    Even if you go nuts with the data you save, the saved game will be less than a megabyte, and that takes, what, a second to load?

    Jon Acheson

    --
    All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
  173. Improved Program Activation... by malfunct · · Score: 1
    Seems like it would be trivial to implement a loader that recorded your computer config right to the CD and only let the cd load itself on the computer with that config. Since its CDR and not CDRW it would be permanent once written.

    A major disadvantage I could see with a system like that is you leave the disk in the sun for a short while and all the dye turns dark and you have permanently ruined the disc. Hmmmm I need to get that patent application out *wink* Does a /. post count as prior art? lol

    --

    "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

  174. As for DRM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if you use the CDR-ROMs in a regular CD-ROM drive (As in it can't burn). Or would they just get around this saying that you're required to have a CD-R/RW drive? A way to get around that would be to use some ghosting software to put the CD on the harddrive, and then it'd write to the Vitrual CD that is on the hard drive. This way you could reuse the CDR-ROM.

    And they thought they had us.

  175. Great! by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

    Then if there's a powerouttage or something while you're saving, the $50 game can get messed up instead of just the $10 memory card. And instead of carrying around memory cards that are durable and can fit in a pocket, we'd get to carry arround discs and worry about breaking them. YAY!

  176. Re:The Ideal Use by Leigh13 · · Score: 1
    one good thing about doing it this way is that a lot of people rent games before deciding to buy them so the save info would still be there even tho it's a different cd.
    It's been years since the last time I rented a video game, but I always thought it was fun to rent Genesis games that had other people's saved games on it. That's something that you don't get with the new systems that all use optical media. Plus, you can't create game characters or NHL '95 users with all sorts of dirty names. ;)
    --

    What I should have said was nothing.
  177. In the beginning it was "CD-PROM" by fadden · · Score: 1
    The format was available from Kodak, known as "CD-PROM", until it was discontinued about four months ago.

    The notice of its discontinuation can be found at kodak.com.

    The ability to mix recordable and non-recordable data is built into the Orange Book standard. The ODC claim to cleverness (which you can see in the press release) is solely in their manufacturing technology.

  178. Karma drought by billcopc · · Score: 1

    Hey, if only you hadn't mentioned AOL in the story, I could have first posted for Funny +5 Karma.

    Sneer!

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  179. Re:Mr Rogers Dead at 74 by vanillacoke · · Score: 0

    either that or wait next week for a offical post.

    --
    The secret to getting modded up is to allways say i've got karma to burn in your sig..
  180. One problem by BadluckShleprock · · Score: 1

    The mass produced CD-ROMs are not "burned" the same way that -R and -RW discs are. There is a manufacturing process that laser-etches the little bits to the surface of the disc and allows for VERY low cost mass production (and the record companies don't understand why we use KaZaa instead of paying $20 for the latest cookie cutter hip-hop artist, but I digress. . .). Anyway, the discs would have to be a certain percentage recordable and non-recordable surfaces which would dramatically increase the cost of discs. AOL would go from paying about .00001 cents a piece to about 50 cents a piece and for those of you that don't have a calculator handy, that's a 50000% increase.

    --


    ------
    There's a fine line between cuddling and holding someone down so they can't get away.
  181. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    Real computer scientists despise the idea of actual hardware. Hardware has
    limitations, software doesn't. It's a real shame that Turing machines are
    so poor at I/O.

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...