Slashdot Mirror


Walk-thru Fog Screen

fluor2 writes "Ever wanted a screen floating in air? Two scientists, Ismo Rakkolainen and Karri Palovuori, both from Tampere University of Technology, Finland have come up with an idea. It is called the Walk-thru Fog Screen. The fog screen, consisting of 'fog' that is blown down from top, and the protective laminar airflow creates a thin and crisp surface, pretty undisturbed by the air in the rest of the room, making it ideal for projector usage. People can walk right through this screen of fog. Their next idea is to use the fog as a touch-screen, making it even more accessible." For a screen one can walk through, the image quality is better than I'd have thought.

333 comments

  1. hmmm by boogy+nightmare · · Score: 5, Funny

    is this what they call vapor-ware ?

    S

    --
    Kingdom of Loathing (www.kingdomofloathing.com) Addicted is me
    1. Re:hmmm by shfted! · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, but it would be the perfect display for playing Myst...

      --
      He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
    2. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      is this what they call vapor-ware ? LOL. If I had mod points sir, I would definitely mod you up +5 funny.

    3. Re:hmmm by rf0 · · Score: 1

      Wonder if you could freeze the fog to make it into a solid screen...

      Hmm

      Rus

    4. Re:hmmm by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1, Funny

      And I thought 'hardware' was the bits you could kick. Damnit.

    5. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah ah, just what Darl Mc Bride needed: a fog screen to present SCO stuff...

    6. Re:hmmm by moinefou · · Score: 3, Funny

      Cool, then you should hear the sound of the Long-Horn trough the the fog-screen

    7. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wonder if you're able to breath in the room when this smoke is there for a couple of hours.

    8. Re:hmmm by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 1

      No, but it would be the perfect display for playing Myst...

      Not to mention running Steam...

    9. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I could get one of these without the accual display part of it (just the fog wall) for under $1000, I'd do it.

      Theres many more uses for a visual-but-not-audio-or-tactile wall than one might think.

    10. Re:hmmm by hesiod · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Wonder if you could freeze the fog to make it into a solid screen...

      Umm, no, it would make snow.

    11. Re:hmmm by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      > > Wonder if you could freeze the fog to make it into a solid screen...
      > Umm, no, it would make snow.
      Umm, no, it would make sleet. Snizzle, actually.

      ...Eventually you would accumulate a solid screen.
      If you're cool enough.

      It would make snow if you're pushing the water down with a high pressure air blast. That's how artificial snow machines work -- expanding air freezes the water. You'd need a really loud sound system to go with that screen.

    12. Re:hmmm by mikecarrmikecarr · · Score: 1

      is this what they call vapor-ware ?

      ...your humor is so transparent *ducks*

      --

      ID-10-T is a way of life

  2. OMG by eaglebtc · · Score: 1, Interesting

    For some moments in life, there are no words. But for this moment, I have but three:

    Oh...Emm...Gee!!!! (OMG)

    Just imagine! You know the holographs they designed for the Star Wars trilogies? Those effects are now possible with this sort of device, and the fog would look so much more natural in the movie! Besides movies, what other uses can you imagine for this technology?

    Just watched the video clip of the two Finns demonstrating the screen in the museum. It appears the wall of fog is very thick, though the creators said this is adjustable depending on how transparent you want the screen to be. Wonder how quiet/noisy this is, and whether they can clean up the bottom of the screen.

    ** Early post, but possibly the first useful post?

    --
    Homestarrunner.net -- It's Dot Com!
    1. Re:OMG by jmccay · · Score: 3, Funny

      This actually reminds me more of the Membari 360 degree display of battles, and the display screens on the Whitestar fleet. They both came down from the ceiling.
      This is cool technology! Although, I'd think you'd want to keep it away from wall and wooden areas to prevent the growth of mold and mildew.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    2. Re:OMG by PSaltyDS · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No mold or mildew involved because there doesn't have to be water vapor involved. The mist does not get things wet, according to the article. That means it is not water. More like the fake smoke used for special effects, probably.

      Two posts in one article and I already used my sig, now what...?

      --
      Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. - Geek's corollary to Clarke's law
    3. Re:OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That greasy crap? I wouldn't want to be in a room that had one of these thing running. Just think of breathing in all that shit...

    4. Re:OMG by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > The mist does not get things wet, according to the article. That means it is not water. More like the fake smoke used for special effects

      Actually, I believe it does not get things wet because the flow of the mist is targetted by the air shooting down in front of & behind the mist. Therefore, the only thing to get wet would be a small area directly under the fog, which probably has a way to drain off excess liquid.

    5. Re:OMG by jmccay · · Score: 1

      Then something could get wet. Him I want to see this thing in action.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
  3. Great.. now I'd like to by jkrise · · Score: 4, Funny

    walk through my Blue Screen of Death!

    -

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:Great.. now I'd like to by Doppler00 · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...and into another dimension, where the stable version of windows actually exists...

    2. Re:Great.. now I'd like to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In an infinite universe... everything has to exist somewhere... except that - that's just too far out.

    3. Re:Great.. now I'd like to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange, I seem to be in that universe.. I've always suspected I didn't exist, though.

    4. Re:Great.. now I'd like to by oshy · · Score: 1

      Usually I want to just put my foot through it. This would save on broken monitors.

    5. Re:Great.. now I'd like to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about 2k on approved hardware? Seems pretty godamn stable to me, but then again owning up to this fact would prevent you from making the same stupid joke over and over again.

      Durr HEY SLASHDOT!!!11
      What do computers and airconditioners have in common?
      They both stop working when you open windows!!!1
      OMG ROTFLMAO!!!! LOOOLLLLZ
      omg hot grits in soviet russian bases belong to SCO!!!!111 LOOOLLLLLZ0RZZ

    6. Re:Great.. now I'd like to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People so inept with computers that they can't get Windows stable? That's sad... Or maybe you should try something other than crappy Windows 9x?

    7. Re:Great.. now I'd like to by daeley · · Score: 1

      That's the one where Bill Gates has a goatee and runs a company reknown for its innovation. ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  4. Seaquest DSV by Microlith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So will this be installed with a "Wise Old Man" Genuine People Personality in the Captain's quarters of future naval ships?

    Will we see giant submarines in the future that go into space and...

    Err, sorry. Got sidetracked.

    This is cool. In a 1996 sorta way.

    1. Re:Seaquest DSV by Alranor · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Genuine People Personality software is patented by the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation, so i'd be careful that they don't sue :)

    2. Re:Seaquest DSV by zebs · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Genuine People Personality software is patented by the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation, so i'd be careful that they don't sue :)

      Don't you mean Sirius Cybernetics cOrporation?

    3. Re:Seaquest DSV by Alranor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, a fairly famous book once described the marketing division of the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation as 'a bunch of mindless jerks who'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes' , that does sound like a reasonable description of SCO :)

    4. Re:Seaquest DSV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well thats exactly what I said.
      'cept I didn't spell it out
      Fickle mods

    5. Re:Seaquest DSV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THANK GOD. It would have bugged me all day trying to remember which Sci-Fi(?) show I had seen this in.

    6. Re:Seaquest DSV by Uart · · Score: 1

      Seems you beat me to it. However, I prepared a LINK!

      Seriously though, they totally stole the idea from Roy Scheider (Schneider?)...

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    7. Re:Seaquest DSV by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      The Genuine People Personality software is patented by the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation, so i'd be careful that they don't sue :)

      Here's an original idea: We could take the concept of GPP software, write out the descriptions and implementations, drop it in a time warp so it appears in the past, and we could use it to prove the idea was ours all along.

      That's an idea so unique, it might even gain a mention in Encyclopedia Galactica.

    8. Re:Seaquest DSV by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      I'm gratified to see that I'm not the only one that immediately remembered this scifi "prior art".

      One wonders if at least one of the researchers was a fan of the show, or at least the first season.

    9. Re:Seaquest DSV by smaart · · Score: 1

      I guess I'm not the only one. I should have read on further before posting my own Seaquest comment. They really do need to give credit where it's due though.

  5. Seen it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't this the type of TV set they had in Seaquest DSV for the AI computer?

    1. Re:Seen it before by Nikan · · Score: 1

      yup

    2. Re:Seen it before by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Wasn't this the type of TV set they had in Seaquest DSV for the AI computer?

      Yes it was. It's simply someone that yet again took an idea from Science Fiction and made it reality.

      Kinda like thise silly Sattelites, lasers and rockets to the moon :-)

      It's just that it seems that science is catching up to Science Fiction alot faster these days.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Seen it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      psst.. dont tell anyone but word is that the seaquest projector was not science fiction but just a smoke generator and a rgb projector they had on the set.

    4. Re:Seen it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I propose that it's not the science catching up faster, but the science fiction no longer so far ahead.

      Going to the moon was absurd as going to Alpha Centauri when it was in Sci Fi, but now we make movies about going to Mars which can only be seen as the most logical, direct, next step.

      Contact was one of the few farther reaching science fiction stories to have any success, but written by Carl Sagan (The book is excellent, and much better for the Slashdot crowd than the movie) who was one of the great minds of previous decades.

      Someone once mentioned (maybe here on /. in the comments) that the future seemed to be getting closer and closer, and it turned out that it was always 2000. "The Future is Now". Which has a depressing affect on our outlook.

      Kennedy's speech, "By the end of the decade", put a very tight deadline on future technology at the time, but now a whole decade seems incredibly distant in the future to so much of our 'leadership', be they CEOs, politicians, what have you.

      ~Blake

    5. Re:Seen it before by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > it turned out [the future] was always 2000.

      So now, when we talk about the future, should we reference the year 3000? Seems the next logical step.

    6. Re:Seen it before by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      This reminds me of The Onion article "US Dept of Retro Warns: 'We May Be Running Out of Past'" . :-)

      the U.S.'s exponentially decreasing retro gap is in danger of achieving parity with real-time historical events early in the next century, creating what leading retro experts call a "futurified recursion loop," or "retro-present warp," in the world of American pop-cultural kitsch appreciation.

      Such a warp, Williams said, was never a danger in the past due to the longtime, standard two-decade-minimum retro waiting period. "However, the mid-'80s deregulation of retro under the Reagan Administration eliminated that safeguard," he explained, "leaving us to face the threat of retro-ironic appreciation being applied to present or even future events."

      "We are talking about a potentially devastating crisis situation in which our society will express nostalgia for events which have yet to occur," Williams told reporters.



    7. Re:Seen it before by ScottKin · · Score: 1

      Excuse me?

      The system in Capt. Bridger's quarters WAS a reality - it was not some CGI sequence, it WAS a projection system using a vertically-descending fog-screen/curtain, held vertically in position by the laminar-flow effect of an air-curtain. The only "scifi" element was the autonomous AI construct displayed on the fog-screen.

      It is NOT new. Leave it to the Finns to name something already used and seen by millions over 10 years ago as "new"....oh, wait - didn't Linus Torvalds already do that with Linux?

      The Finns are like the Japanese with Technology - only that the The Finns are stuck in a temporal rift in the Time/Space Continuum that perpetually locks them into a 10-years-ago timeframe.

      ScottKin

      --
      I don't give a rat's behind about "karma" here or anywhere else. Don't like what I have to say here? Deal with it!
  6. CCOOOOOOLL!!! by torpor · · Score: 1

    Now imagine the synth--nerd concerts, where you can see what he's seeing on his laptop, projected behind him!

    Coooooooll!!! No more cheesy laptop musicians - make the software part of the act too! :)

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:CCOOOOOOLL!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh.. you don't need a fog-screen to do this...

      ???

    2. Re:CCOOOOOOLL!!! by LudditeMind · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or even better a fluid mechanics plugin for winamp! You could display fog on the fog!

    3. Re:CCOOOOOOLL!!! by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > You could display fog on the fog!

      It's the ultimate in redundancy.

  7. Video/mpeg confusions! by Yarn · · Score: 1
    MPEG video of the musem prototype (windows media 9 format (720x576, like DVD). You need a new version of windows media player to view it. 1 min. 15 sec., total 21 MB)


    Just because it's computer video doesn't mean it's mpeg!

    Alas I can't transcode it to mpeg either.
    --
    -Yarn - Rio Karma: Excellent
    1. Re:Video/mpeg confusions! by Richard+W.M.+Jones · · Score: 1
      I can view the WMV video in Xine OK.

      Unfortunately it's when you see the video that you realise that the technology has, shall we say, some way to go before we'll all be using it in dull business meetings.

      Rich.

    2. Re:Video/mpeg confusions! by Ken+Broadfoot · · Score: 1


      mplayer for linux works well with both formats...

      ( gmplayer )

      --ken

      --
      Bitcoin pyramid: Join here: http://www.bitcoinpyramid.com/r/1427 it's FREE!
    3. Re:Video/mpeg confusions! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      use te windows codec's pack that comes with mplayer

    4. Re:Video/mpeg confusions! by Doppler00 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I watched it, it's not worth downloading. It's just two geeks walking through a screen of fog. At one point one of them flaps his hands like he is a bird lol... maybe it is kind of funny.

      It's an interesting experiment anyways.

    5. Re:Video/mpeg confusions! by sonicattack · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yep, using closed, proprietary, non-standards when there is no absolute need to do so is _very_ irritating.

      When creating video clips like this, what is so HARD about using an open, well established standard that everyone (including the few % not running M$ media player) can use?

      Btw, This is the first wmv I can't play at first attempt in mplayer under Linux. A file called 'wmv9dmod.dll' seems to be missing - can't find it on my Windows 98 installation either... :(

      To be at least a bit on topic, this technology seems awesome! I hope there will be an "affordable" consumer version ready.... Real Soon ... For my movie experiences in my living room!

    6. Re:Video/mpeg confusions! by RevSmiley · · Score: 1

      Why can't folks just use mpeg2? If you don't have IE and Window Media Player which I don't you will never get me watching this kind of stuff. Kind of hard to do on a Linux box. mpeg2 I can do. Are windows encoders cheaper or some shit?

      --
      As you can see I don't care about my karma.
    7. Re:Video/mpeg confusions! by Yarn · · Score: 1

      Only on x86. To display the wmv it requires the directshow components from a windows install.

      I'm on a Mac here.

      --
      -Yarn - Rio Karma: Excellent
  8. Sounds like SeqQuest... by Psiren · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Sounds like the hologram they had in SeaQuest DSV. Not that I ever watched that program of course... ;)

    1. Re:Sounds like SeqQuest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, i too have never watched sq dsv, just like everyone else, but its the same project stuff on fog thing...

      and because no one ever watched seaquest the finns made the scientific breakthrough of the century !

      sneaky bastards...

  9. Those CRAZY FINNS again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh my! Those Finns are really crazy!

  10. It's only a matter of time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...before R2-D2 projects "help me ObiWan, you're my only hope!!

  11. Johnny by joshua.robinson · · Score: 3, Funny

    Get out of the screen what do you think you are? Made out ouf Glass?

    --
    Whats A sig anyway
  12. porn? by narkotix · · Score: 1

    Imagine the uses for porn!

    --
    We played dungeons and dragons for 3 hours.....then i was slain by an elf
    1. Re:porn? by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, geeks can now have sex with fog! Getting to hologram sex, slowly but surely. :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooooohhh yessss, fog me harder!

    3. Re:porn? by staed · · Score: 1, Funny

      then i really hope it's not that infamous fog that turns people inside-out.

    4. Re:porn? by Darth+Fredd · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'd like to see holograms on this next. Of course, we have that projected thing we saw here the other day, but wouldn't it be cooler to have a walk through "supermodel simulator"? (complete with sound, of course: "ooh! your distro turns me on!")

      i think i should get some sleep before i say anything stupider..

      --
      "The most looniest, zaniest, spontaneous, sporadic Impulsive thinker, compulsive drinker, addict"
  13. repost.... by iamhassi · · Score: 2, Informative
    either I mistakenly set my sys clock back to last year or this is a repost.

    My god slashdot!! Can't you keep your stories straight?? If not SEARCH GOOGLE!!. That's how I found it again.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    1. Re:repost.... by Ken+Broadfoot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are right...
      However the story was new to me. So I am not too upset.

      --ken

      --
      Bitcoin pyramid: Join here: http://www.bitcoinpyramid.com/r/1427 it's FREE!
    2. Re:repost.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and if you look at the date that the page was updated you will see that... (fill in the blanks, find Waldo, or whatever)

    3. Re:repost.... by Arciryon · · Score: 1

      Nevertheless: this submission had actual links. And this, correct me if I am wrong, was the first time a working prototype has been officially demonstrated.

    4. Re:repost.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Mods are different too:

      Re:It's all done with Smoke and Mirrors... (Score:3, Funny)
      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 08, @06:21PM (#4412962)

      This is nothing but vapor-ware


      vs todays':


      hmmm (Score:5, Funny)
      by boogy nightmare (207669) on Friday August 08, @05:29AM (#6643279)

      is this what they call vapor-ware ?


      That joke becomes funnier with time?

    5. Re:repost.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, just more clueless moderators

    6. Re:repost.... by GothChip · · Score: 2, Funny

      Even the comments are the same...

    7. Re:repost.... by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
      Revisit, not a repost. Also, some of us didn't see it a year ago. I myself only joined /. about 8 months ago - and your user number is 60k above mine, so you either spent a long time lurking, or you're just one of those people that searches for every story looking for a dupe.

      I think if it goes a year before a dupe, it's no longer a dupe. A week, sure, a month or two, yeah, but past that - come on, we're the MTV generation... we don't have attention spa- hey, what's that?

      -T

    8. Re:repost.... by iamhassi · · Score: 1
      Just because everyone that's ever visited slashdot didn't see the first article doesn't mean it should be reposted. If you turned on your news and they reported 9/11 or the shuttle accident as "new" news would you be happy? What if some guy living in a cave said "well I didn't see it the frist time"?

      Sorry, just because you missed the news doesn't mean they should keep reporting the same old news.

      p.s. although it says "updated 2003" many of the pictures look the same as they did last year.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  14. It would make for a great cinema effect by Ken+Broadfoot · · Score: 5, Interesting


    I am not really sure what display use it has in the "real world" but it would make a great cinematic effect.

    Also you could scare folks in amusement park rides making them think they are about to crash into stuff.

    You could also hide behind it and spy on people maybe...

    Who knows...

    --ken

    --
    Bitcoin pyramid: Join here: http://www.bitcoinpyramid.com/r/1427 it's FREE!
    1. Re:It would make for a great cinema effect by dmeranda · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In the real world, fog screens tend to make terrible pileups on the highways where the crashes aren't so pretend.

      As far as amusement parks, good luck trying to keep a laminar airflow while a high velocity vehicle whizes by. And forget outdoors, the breeze would carry your image away, that's if you could even see it in the sunlight. Probably more useful in a haunted house ride...life-like ghosts, and cool the airflow and you also get the chill down the back of your neck too.

    2. Re:It would make for a great cinema effect by gfody · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Applications
      The fog screen enables many novel applications indoors. Interesting applications include walk-thru advertisements on shops or malls, or a walk-thru screen in world-class museums, corporate showrooms, trade fairs, theme parks, special events, spas, theatres, science centers, lobbies, etc. We can extend the technology to limited outdoor usage. We will also present some intriguing new concepts later.

      The fog screen is silent and non-breakable, which enables safe gaming, exercise or training, and non-supervised public presentations. It also enables the audience to enter and exit rapidly through the walls into, e.g., virtual environments, which may be even sequential. Mixed reality and immersive projection technology could use CAVE-like virtual rooms with fog walls, making them effectively "virtual virtual rooms".

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    3. Re:It would make for a great cinema effect by Biomechanoid · · Score: 5, Funny

      Also you could scare folks in amusement park rides making them think they are about to crash into stuff.

      Yeah you could also put signs before the ride saying "this ride is safe using smokescreens", but during the ride they actually crash really really hard into stuff.

    4. Re:It would make for a great cinema effect by th1nk · · Score: 1

      Also you could scare folks in amusement park rides making them think they are about to crash into stuff.

      Yeah you could also put signs before the ride saying "this ride is safe using smokescreens", but during the ride they actually crash really really hard into stuff.


      Jack Handy lives!

    5. Re:It would make for a great cinema effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would this be cheaper than the chameleon suits that the military would be building? You would be wearing a suit of Fog, instead of suit of LCD . . . :-p I imagine it would at least be more comfortable.

    6. Re:It would make for a great cinema effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably more useful in a haunted house ride...life-like ghosts, and cool the airflow and you also get the chill down the back of your neck too.

      Doh!

    7. Re:It would make for a great cinema effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You could also hide behind it and spy on people maybe..." ...pervert.

    8. Re:It would make for a great cinema effect by scrawny · · Score: 1

      If I put one of these screens right next to a cliff wall, I could get Roadrunner to slam into it! I'll do that right now and I'll watch from behind that rock.

      -W.E.Coyote

    9. Re:It would make for a great cinema effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seem to recall Disneyland's Indiana Jones ride uses something similar already. In a part where you're driving throuigh the dark and a bunch of bats fly towards you and you drive through them. I could swear it's an image projected on fog. And that ride has been around for how long?

    10. Re:It would make for a great cinema effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go ride Indiana Jones at Disneyland and then marvel as your high velocity vehicle whizzes through one.

    11. Re:It would make for a great cinema effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I am not really sure what display use it has in the "real world"

      I'll tell you where you're going to see this....
      department stores. Advertising. *EVERYWHERE*.

      We're doomed.

  15. Uuh-oh by Jason1729 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the article: The fog screen enables many novel applications indoors. Interesting applications include walk-thru advertisements on shops or malls, or a walk-thru screen in world-class museums, corporate showrooms, trade fairs, theme parks, special events, spas, theatres, science centers, lobbies, etc. We can extend the technology to limited outdoor usage.

    Does anyone else find it find it very disturbing that the first application they suggest is advertising?

    Jason
    ProfQuotes

    1. Re:Uuh-oh by mr_exit · · Score: 1

      not really... companies can easily spend $2M putting together a tv ad, what better way to bring the costs of production down then to sell the first few for advertising pourposes....

      And what would you rather.... instore advertising/pushy sales people getting increasingly obnoxious and garish to catch your eye and get your attention, or something cool and geeky like this?

      --

      -------
      Drink Coffee - Do Stupid Things Faster And With More Energy!
    2. Re:Uuh-oh by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would it be disturbing that one of the most apparent uses for this technology is advertising ? Its not going to bring peace or solve world hunger. I'm sure the inventors will be looking to make a few dollars for their time and effort. The advertising industry will lap up, and pay top dollar for technology that allows them greater flexibility in advertising. Its probably the market the inventors have intended all along.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    3. Re:Uuh-oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the 3 possible applications for any new technology are bring world peace, solve world hunger, or advertise? Now that you mention it, that does sound about right.

    4. Re:Uuh-oh by gfody · · Score: 1

      whats disturbing are the videos in that article.. could you imagine trying to watch anything on that? the first 12 inches from the top seems stable, the rest of it looks like your projecting onto curtains with a shopfan blowing on them.

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    5. Re:Uuh-oh by Biomechanoid · · Score: 1

      Does anyone else find it find it very disturbing that the first application they suggest is advertising?

      Yes, those insensitive clods could have at least advertised slashdot first.

    6. Re:Uuh-oh by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
      Not really, most technologies used to display things are used to advertise something. A flashing redlight on a car for instances advertises that this car is an ambulance. I fail to see anything disturbing in that. ;)

      Anyway there is indeed probably no immidiate hightech use for this. I imagined something like a screen in an operating room to give the surgeon information, but without blocking movement like a normal screen would. You know put the screen over the chest if the surgeon is working on the head, but then if the patient goes into arrest he can work on the chest without loosing a single second in removing a regular screen.

      But the resolution is probably to low for now.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    7. Re:Uuh-oh by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Advertising has always been where the money is... untill we (consumers) reach our max saturation level, at which point they'll keep advertising out of habit.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    8. Re:Uuh-oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I don't want to walk through advertisements at the mall. The stuff is intrusive enough as it is. Billboards I have to walk through will strongly tempt me to bring a battery-powered leafblower everywhere I go.

    9. Re:Uuh-oh by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
      Does anyone else find it find it very disturbing that the first application they suggest is advertising?

      Yeah, I thought pr0n would have been much more obvious. ;)

      -T

    10. Re:Uuh-oh by sacrilicious · · Score: 1
      Does anyone else find it find it very disturbing that the first application they suggest is advertising?

      On an ongoing basis I do find it somewhat disturbing how many people reflexively think of any phenomenon in terms of commerce. I recently stood with a friend in a beautiful 400-year-old chapel. We were both impressed with the atmospheric music and subtle lighting that had been set up. My friend then commented - without a trace of humor - "Wow this is great marketing!" I don't know if the comment bordered on blasphemy, and wouldn't care if it did, but its roots in an overcommercialized world did not seem in doubt to me.

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    11. Re:Uuh-oh by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Does anyone else find it find it very disturbing that the first application they suggest is advertising?

      If he put it at the end of the list, the advertising execs would never have seen it.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    12. Re:Uuh-oh by switcha · · Score: 1
      The advertising industry will lap up, and pay top dollar for technology that allows them greater flexibility in advertising.

      Not so much greater flexibility and greater market penetration. Get it...penetration...you can walk through it...

      Oh man,....I've hit bottom.

      --
      You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
  16. Mimes are evil by hey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The video features a mime. No not a MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) but one of those guys with the white face paint. A very bad choice. If they don't want people to hate their product they sound use *anything* else.

    1. Re:Mimes are evil by Bostik · · Score: 1

      FYI: We (Finns) don't have the history of being harassed by beggar-mimes in our streets. Interestingly, mimestry(sp?) is considered a difficult kind of art performance. The few selected ones I've seen have actually been pretty damn good.

      Judging by the common jokes about outdoor park mimes tailing people and making everyone feel miserable, they must be all too frequent a phenomenon in U.S.

      --
      There is no such thing as good luck. There is only misfortune and its occasional absence.
    2. Re:Mimes are evil by BlueTooth · · Score: 1

      Yes. Things are much worse here in the US. I take public transit to work, so I have to walk a couple of blocks on each end of my communte.

      I usually get acosted by at least four or five mimes a day.

      --
      SPAM
    3. Re:Mimes are evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they don't want people to hate their product they sound use *anything* else.

      note to researchers: Boobies.

  17. I say by Jage · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's all just smoke and mirrors!

    1. Re:I say by Jage · · Score: 1

      Blah, and I thought I said something original, for once... ;)

  18. This is going to confuse the crap out of Batman by Timesprout · · Score: 3, Funny

    How will he know when the Comissioner really calls him and its not just a couple of Finns messing about with their own batsign?

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  19. The foggers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This isn't going to be used in business meetings, where projection screens are available anyway. I guess smoke-screens will be used as advertising space: One could use them much closer to or in the way of the customer flow at trade shows, without risking damage to equipment or consumer. For that purpose, a little image unstability may even prove useful as eye-catcher.

    1. Re:The foggers! by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Also, think of the costs involved: a projection screen just sits there, costing nothing except what you paid for it. Whereas this fog screen requires a constant flow of air, which costs electricity, and the fog must be generated somehow as well.

      The projector is a fixed cost for either use (unless you need a brighter projector to use on the fog screen, it didn't really mention that but it seems reasonable). So a business would tend toward using projection screens for in-house meetings.

      Now, for customer meetings it could be considered an advertising/marketing cost.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    2. Re:The foggers! by tigheig · · Score: 1

      This isn't going to be used in business meetings, where projection screens are available anyway.

      Of course it will be used in Corporate boardrooms, and probably very quickly once the technology becomes viable. I can't count the number of complaints I've heard from my management about the amount of wasted wall space taken up by fixed projection screens. They get replaced with an manual pull-down or electric screen that descends from the ceiling, and someone breaks it. Or worse, they want a white-board in that spot as well, so they don't lose all that space, and then someone forgets that they have the screen down and writes on the screen with a white-board marker (just try to get that out!)

      Once the technology reaches a point where the definition is good enough for presentations and the maintenance costs are less than $10K/year it will be used, particularly in companies where presenting a corporate image of being on top of technology is considered important.

    3. Re:The foggers! by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1
      I guess smoke-screens will be used as advertising space

      And how is that different from what we have today? :)

      --
      Dyolf Knip
  20. Dupe by codework · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This is a dupe from a while back (almost a year ago)... slashdot

  21. Application by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like every new technology, this will be commercialized first by the porn industry. Combined with the touch-screen capabilities, and some tactile feedback, this sounds like a great success...

  22. Woo by rf0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now this is a cool and useful thing. It would be cool to have something like this in the home so I could use it as a monitor. If the main unit was hidden with a drop down keyboard. Well hidden PC :)

    Rus

  23. Ars story by BigAl_nz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ars Technica story on the same thing.

    --
    --- There isn't any problem that can't be solved by a small, low yield nuclear device, is there??
    1. Re:Ars story by jea6 · · Score: 1

      How Slashdot is this? On a dup/"revisited" article, a five digit id /.er posts a link to a shorter article that quotes the original article that mods didn't read but saw the pictures. Then mod link up. Wow, now you just need to misspell something (preferably CowboyNeal) to achieve Slashdot bliss.

      --

      sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
    2. Re:Ars story by synaptik · · Score: 1

      As a 3-digit id /.er, what do you recommend that I should do to achieve such bliss?

      --
      HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
      NO CARRIER
    3. Re:Ars story by jea6 · · Score: 1

      Three new t-shirts are the best I can suggest. I've also put you on my friends list so that your low-digitness can rub off on me.

      Didn't somebody eBay a low /. id a while ago? Hmmmm....

      --

      sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
    4. Re:Ars story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oooh look at me... my penis size is inversely proportional to my Slashdot ID number. Of course since I'm an anonymous coward, I must have an infinite vagina.

    5. Re:Ars story by synaptik · · Score: 1

      I've also put you on my friends list so that your low-digitness can rub off on me.

      Damn, I guess now I have to continue to be aloof and mysterious, so as to not disabuse you of the idea that a low uid correlates well to being cool. :)

      --
      HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
      NO CARRIER
    6. Re:Ars story by synaptik · · Score: 1

      Oooh look at me... my penis size is inversely proportional to my Slashdot ID number.

      So, my UID is inversely proportional to my penis size you say? ...That sounds about right to me. ;)

      I think you intended that as an insult, but you ended up being complimentary, and should I say, accurate. ;)

      --
      HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
      NO CARRIER
  24. Vau kivaa! by euroderph · · Score: 0, Troll

    Ehka pierusumu toimisi paremmin?

    1. Re:Vau kivaa! by ultramarweeni · · Score: 1

      Paskamainen haju :\

    2. Re:Vau kivaa! by euroderph · · Score: 1

      Voi helvetti

  25. Of course... by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    Yes, disturbing, but how else should they go about getting major corporate funding ASAP?

    I'm sure some ad execs are having trouble sleeping, thinking of all the fun uses they can put this to...

    --------
    If I can own an idea, does that mean I can legally claim some portion of your soul once I tell you that idea? Or even if you just come up with it on your own? Heck, who needs contracts written in blood...

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  26. Cubed for Outdoor Concerts! by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 3, Funny

    Grab your favorite smelly hippie and head out to the old outdoor venue, forget about 90+ degree temps when you hop into the Fog Screen 3D!

    Based on the "mist tents" seen at Lollapalalaala(TM), you'll trip balls walking thru the 50 foot cube of cooling fog filled with visuals that _may_ have something to do with the music!

    Seriously, this is a great idea and I expect we'll see something based on this which gets the audience inside the thing at entertainment venues in the future. I also would like to say I'm glad to see it looking so good in the demo pics.

    Jonah Hex

    1. Re:Cubed for Outdoor Concerts! by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      It would be more of a box than a cube. A cube implies that the center is solid. In this case you could have 4 walls, each with an image. Also, it wouldn't work too well during the day.

  27. i saw it at siggraph last week by plagiarist · · Score: 5, Informative

    i saw it at siggraph last week in san diego. the wall of fog was not really very thick - though it did seem to be more transparent than and not as bright as it appears in the videos and stills on the site. it was still pretty cool and people seemed duly impressed, but i didn't think it was quite as convincing as a picture plane as it looks on the website.

    as for noise - i don't recall it being noisy... it may not have made any noise at all. then again, the siggraph emerging technologies space is pretty noisy itself, so it may have made some sound that i didn't notice.

    1. Re:i saw it at siggraph last week by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I saw something similar at the city center at a city in China recently...they had water spigots that sprayed fine water vapor (droplets actually). A projector projected an image onto this vaporous area. Overall it was pretty impressive, the image was several stories high. You could only see the image from one side, I had to walk a ways to get to a good spot for viewing.

      Anyway, it was impressive until I saw what they were showing. All that achievement and technology, and they were showing a Doraemon anime. I think it was a pirate VCD because there were illegible subtitles on the bottom of the screen. The resolution was pretty low. It would have been much better off with a production specifically designed for the medium.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:i saw it at siggraph last week by spitzak · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Saw this as Siggraph as well. It did attract a lot of interest. I walked through it, and most impressive is that you do not feel anything, the airflow is suprisingly low. The biggest problem I had is that the very bright light from the actual projector is visible, I see no way to avoid this and the image certainly looked better the more you are in line with the projector, but that light was blinding.

      Also at the same show and more interesting imho:

      The most important thing there was a High Dynamic Range display. They placed an LCD in front of a rear-projection display and the combined modulation results in a contrast range of 70000:1. This allows much more realistic images. The images I saw looked like a good slide projector, but could be better in a darker room. There was some registration problems, but they say they are working on using bright white LED's behind the LCD, resulting in a flat screen that is as sharp as an LCD. PS: they patented the idea, which for this I think is ok as long as they actually manufacture an open device, they were a little hesitant to say this, though the current driver is just a dual-headed graphics card and it seems hard to believe you could do much better than that.

      Also interesting was a rear-projection globe. It was maybe 6' in diameter and translucent white. This used a single rear projector in the base, reflected off a cone-shaped mirror inside at the top, to project on all sides. They had software showing images of the earth, other planets, continental plate drift. The brightness was suprisingly uniform and the fact that there was a black hole at the north pole was not a problem. A trackball let you spin the globe and the image moves very solidly, indicating the geometry is pretty accurate and they matched it with their image warping software (probably a hardware renderer using texture maps to distort the image correctly). Biggest problem is the room is going to have to be really dark for it to look good.

      There was also a demo of those "project on a flat surface" keyboards, and it really works. You can learn to type on it correctly in only a few minutes of practice. Biggest problem I see is that the alignment with the flat surface is critical, the phone manufacturers are going to have to come up with clever folding stands to stand the phone/pda at exactly the right angle. Also it seems obvious to me that the projected image could change, not just to different keyboards, but be used as a display. It requires distortion of the display much like that globe, but even a PDA could do that now.

    3. Re:i saw it at siggraph last week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see the specs on the projector they used.
      With projector technology today the image should be extremely bright. Projectors now have capabilities of 3500 ANSI Lumens, which is bright enough to show Star Wars in a fully lit room.

    4. Re:i saw it at siggraph last week by geomon · · Score: 1

      They do something similar at Grand Coulee Dam in central Washington State. They perform a laser light show on the spillway.

      --
      "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    5. Re:i saw it at siggraph last week by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 1

      The most important thing there was a High Dynamic Range display. They placed an LCD in front of a rear-projection display and the combined modulation results in a contrast range of 70000:1. This allows much more realistic images. The images I saw looked like a good slide projector, but could be better in a darker room. There was some registration problems, but they say they are working on using bright white LED's behind the LCD, resulting in a flat screen that is as sharp as an LCD. PS: they patented the idea, which for this I think is ok as long as they actually manufacture an open device, they were a little hesitant to say this, though the current driver is just a dual-headed graphics card and it seems hard to believe you could do much better than that.


      This is obvious stuff. I described a similar idea once in an IRC channel quite a while ago, but using an LCD to modulate a front projection display, either pre-image or post-image.

      A pre-image LCD would adjust the brightness of the light coming from the bulb to allow the full dynamic range of the DLP chip to be used even in darker scenes; a post-image LCD would be used to enhance scenes where one area is very bright and another area is very dark.

  28. Repeat by Ydna · · Score: 0, Redundant

    We already saw this last year.

    --

    "The great thing about multitasking is that several things can go wrong at once." -me

  29. Could this be used to create 'real' holograms? by sonicattack · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the fog somehow is shaped as an object we want to recreate, and projected against from all sides, would this make the object look like a 'real' hologram ('real', like from the movies!) ?

    I can already see a lot of applications for this. Bring out the mimejuice! And crack some ice!

    1. Re:Could this be used to create 'real' holograms? by Rostin · · Score: 1

      Yes, and if pigs somehow had wings, they could fly. :)

    2. Re:Could this be used to create 'real' holograms? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well the fog now is shaped by air being blown down. You could in theory use finely controlled airflows to keep the fog in a certain shape. It would not be totally dissimmilar(?) to how a glass blower shapes glass. Of course glass is a lot more solid then fog :)

      For now probably only very simple shapes would be possible, like say a pyramid. Then again maybe with multiple projectors you can create the illusion of something being inside the fog?

      Then again you can bet your ass that the engineers at places like disney will be researching this very very thoroughly. So who knows.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    3. Re:Could this be used to create 'real' holograms? by rworne · · Score: 1

      Didney did this at least 7-8 years ago with the Fantasmic show. Back then they had this Fantasia deal going on and they would spray a water curtain in the air and project film/video onto it.

      Yes, it's not a fog, but water droplets/vapor. You also could walk through it, but you'd have to swim out into the middle of a lake and get really wet in the process. See here or here for a description.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
  30. Great for firearms training by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This technology would be very useful for extremely realistic firearms training. Think FPS with real guns. The bullets would create holes in the fog screen which could be recognized by video sensors and this information could in turn be used as an input to the simulation.

    --
    Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    1. Re:Great for firearms training by psavo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This technology would be very useful for extremely realistic firearms training. Think FPS with real guns ...

      Sure! This vapor+projector equipment must be way-way cheaper than cardboard used today..

      --
      fucktard is a tenderhearted description
    2. Re:Great for firearms training by RevSmiley · · Score: 1

      heheh When I took a "required" firearms course we used the local police departments shooting range.
      They had two heavy solid wires from which they hung the carboard from freezers, washer and dryer shipping boxes strung across the range. They tape the targets to these. This is for "live" fire. I understand they have some high tech ( prolly 10 year old ) video stuff they train with at the Police Station. I was rather unimpressed as the local sportsmans club range is much nicer and more up to date. It even has shade to shoot under .To top this all off the cops range is at the local sewage treatment plant and it smells prety bad. Some how I just don't see your typical small town police using this Finish invention.

      --
      As you can see I don't care about my karma.
    3. Re:Great for firearms training by Johku · · Score: 2, Funny

      Realistic firearms training?

      "Oops! Sorry, I didn't know you were behind that screen."

    4. Re:Great for firearms training by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      Sure! This vapor+projector equipment must be way-way cheaper than cardboard used today..

      He didn't say cheap, he said realistic--which is rarely cheap.

      The parent is right--that IS an extremely good fit for this technology.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    5. Re:Great for firearms training by heymjo · · Score: 1

      this technique is already in use for about 10 years, videos are projected on a paper video wall, sensors pick up the bullet holes and recalculate or steer the video accordingly.. nothing new really
      I don't see what a fog screen can add here

    6. Re:Great for firearms training by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think FPS with real guns.

      Yeah, and you can make a real life DOOM maze where the IDCLIP command actually works.

    7. Re:Great for firearms training by ptbarnett · · Score: 3, Informative
      This vapor+projector equipment must be way-way cheaper than cardboard used today.

      There are systems in use today that are used to train police (and others) in live-fire simulations. A string of photoelectric sensors line the top/bottom and sides of the screen, allowing the system to identify the impact point.

      However, the system typically uses a thin plastic screen for projection of the video image, which deteriorates after use. This system would be a good replacement for it, although I don't know how long it would take to break-even on the costs.

      In Dallas, you can see and use one:

      http://www.dfwgun.com/InteractiveSystem.htm

      and you can find more info about the system at:

      http://www.ais-sim.com/PRISim/overview.html

    8. Re:Great for firearms training by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 1
      This technology would be very useful for extremely realistic firearms training. Think FPS with real guns. The bullets would create holes in the fog screen..

      It's never safe to think outside the box...

      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
  31. It needs work, IMHO. by Hwatzu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    To be honest, it needs work; the top of the screen looks fine, but turbulence causes the bottom of the screen to ruffle about like a flag in wind. Watch the movies provided; the bottom half of the images are all but lost to distortion.

    1. Re:It needs work, IMHO. by Sherloqq · · Score: 1

      Watch the movies provided; the bottom half of the images are all but lost to distortion.

      Then only use the upper half of the "screen" and your images will look great :)

      --
      Have EVDO, will travel.
  32. Open-standards video by mccalli · · Score: 4, Informative
    When creating video clips like this, what is so HARD about using an open, well established standard that everyone (including the few % not running M$ media player) can use?

    Quite a lot, as it happens. The main hassle being that there aren't any well established open standards that provide decent compression rates. At least, if there are then I'd be grateful for people enlightening me

    I had to put video up on my site - I chose MPEG 1 at first because everyone could view it, but eventually the file sizes started getting huge and I had to switch to something else. ISO MP4 can't be played by MS WMP, Divx and what have you can't be played without installing additional software on client machines...what to pick?

    In the end, I chose .wmv for a while. Seemed to give the best picture quality/file size trade-off. However, since then I've bought myself a Powerbook so all future things will be Quicktime.

    Honestly - if anyone knows a format that can be played on out-of-the-box Windows, OS X and common Linux distros without the installation of any extra software, I'd love to hear about it.

    Cheers,
    Ian

    1. Re:Open-standards video by General+Ishmoo · · Score: 1

      If WMP doesn't play standard MP4 files then MS needs to get their act together. This is industry standard stuff. However, if people keep switching to wmv because WMP won't play MP4, then WMP will never play MP4. The solution? Go with the standard solution and tell people to complain to MS if their standard media player doesn't support industry standards like MP4.

      --
      ----------
      (define (.sig) (cons 'my (list 'other 'car 'is 'a 'cdr)))
      http://4horsemen.net
    2. Re:Open-standards video by anno1a · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You don't really make any sense... You didn't choose divx because it required additional software, so you chose wmv? Wmv can ONLY be played in windows, and I think it requires a fairly new version at that. And now you're switching to Quicktime?? WMP can't play quicktime, everyone hates the quicktime player, and it's hardly supported anywhere! Now you've gone from a more or less open standard, to a rather closed standard which requires a special player. What was wrong with divx again? Or the open XviD for that matter...

      --
      ------- I fumbled my registration and I now must suffer
    3. Re:Open-standards video by mccalli · · Score: 2, Informative
      ...You didn't choose divx because it required additional software...Wmv can ONLY be played in windows,...WMP can't play quicktime

      That was my point - none of the choices available fit the bill. Original poster asked what was hard about putting up standards-compliant video, and my answer is that there's no one file format that plays on all clients and still produces a decent file size/performance trade-off. I've just picked the easiest one for me to work with and stuck with that.

      What was wrong with divx again? Or the open XviD for that matter...

      Extra client software required. The aim is to get a file that plays on the three major OSes in their out-of-the-box configurations. So far, I've not found any format that fits the bill other than MPEG 1, and the file sizes that produces are unacceptably large.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    4. Re:Open-standards video by Nurgled · · Score: 1

      I believe an old beta of media player could play standard MP4, but when they made the release the deliberately broke the codec so that it would only work for decoding the contents of a Windows Media stream.

      I saw a site once which had the old, uncripped codec available for download, but I guess MS have probably put a stop to that particular site by now.

      Still, having to install a beta codec is hardly "out of the box", I suppose.

    5. Re:Open-standards video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have RedHat 8 with latest xine rpm's.
      Just opened OK, no problem.

    6. Re:Open-standards video by Sherloqq · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Honestly - if anyone knows a format that can be played on out-of-the-box Windows, OS X and common Linux distros without the installation of any extra software, I'd love to hear about it.

      While I don't have an answer to that, I know of an answer that requires a similar amount of work for all those platforms: RealPlayer. Yes, it can be annoying. But it works. I happily use RP on windows and linux, and I'm pretty sure even my old PowerBook 5300 could handle it (just to prove it to myself I'll try it tonight).

      No, I don't work for Real. Yes, I work with Real products. Yes, I like 'em. Yes, I'm a geek. And yes, I have a life.

      --
      Have EVDO, will travel.
    7. Re:Open-standards video by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
      Answer, there isn't one, and there isn't going to be one. The reason, well you pretty much mentioned it youreselve. The two commercial desktop makers each have their own codec they want to sell, with the MS being sorta "free" just as long as you buy it with their OS, and the Quicktime codec being free but reall jobs wanting you to pay for it.

      A bit of an outsider is Realplayer. Since it A runs on all major OSes, it doesn't have an OS to leverage users into accepting it as the default and C its player is hated by everyone.

      So the best bet for someone like you? Multiple encodings if you got the space. Or link to the codecs for mac, ms and linux users. Remember it is all about service. See it as what flash does. If youre flash carrying page is loaded on a machine without flash installed it will instead link to a place from wich the flash codec can be installed. Why not do the same for video?

      Oh and flash can be used as a sorta wrapper for video, so if people got the latest flash installed, they can play youre flash embedded movie anywhere.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    8. Re:Open-standards video by James+Lanfear · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Wmv can ONLY be played in windows"

      $ mplayer -vc help | grep wmv
      ffwmv1 ffmpeg working FFmpeg M$ WMV1/WMV7 [wmv1]
      ffwmv2 ffmpeg problems FFmpeg M$ WMV2/WMV8 [wmv2]
      wmv8 dshow working Windows Media Video 8 [wmv8ds32.ax]
      wmv7 dshow working Windows Media Video 7 [wmvds32.ax]
      wmv9dmo dmo working Windows Media Video 9 DMO [wmv9dmod.dll]
      wmvdmo dmo working Windows Media Video DMO [wmvdmod.dll]

      "WMP can't play quicktime, everyone hates the quicktime player, and it's hardly supported anywhere!"

      $ mplayer -vc help | grep qt
      qtrle qtrle working Quicktime Animation (RLE)
      qtrpza qtrpza working Quicktime Apple Video
      qtsmc qtsmc working Apple Graphics (SMC) codec
      qt3ivx qtvideo working win32/quicktime 3IV1 (3ivx) decoder [3ivx Delta 3.5.qtx]
      qth263 qtvideo crashing win32/quicktime H.263 decoder [QuickTime.qts]
      qtrlerpza qtvideo crashing win32/quicktime RLE/RPZA decoder [QuickTime.qts]
      qtvp3 qtvideo crashing win32/quicktime VP3 decoder [On2_VP3.qtx]
      qtzygo qtvideo problems win32/quicktime ZyGo decoder [ZyGoVideo.qtx]
      qtbhiv qtvideo untested win32/quicktime BeHereiVideo decoder [BeHereiVideo.qtx]
      qtcvid qtvideo working win32/quicktime Cinepak decoder [QuickTime.qts]
      qtindeo qtvideo crashing win32/quicktime Indeo decoder [QuickTime.qts]
      qtmjpeg qtvideo crashing win32/quicktime MJPEG decoder [QuickTime.qts]
      qtmpeg4 qtvideo crashing win32/quicktime MPEG-4 decoder [QuickTime.qts]
      qtsvq3 qtvideo working win32/quicktime SVQ3 decoder [QuickTimeEssentials.qtx]
      qtsvq1 qtvideo problems win32/quicktime SVQ1 decoder [QuickTime.qts]

    9. Re:Open-standards video by wift · · Score: 1

      I guess they want you to convert it into every known format requiring huge amounts of server space or better yet convert it into a huge animated .gif.

      Don't sweat it.

      Regards.

      --
      ....... Thus ends my attempt at wit or whatever
    10. Re:Open-standards video by Fweeky · · Score: 1

      DivX/XviD require a tiny, easy to install, open source decoder like ffdshow in Win; similar systems exist for other OS's.

      QuickTime requires a huge bloated badly written hacked up custom player which likes to try to take over half your machine and bugs you to pay for it every time you run it.

      Now, why on earth would you choose the latter over the former?

    11. Re:Open-standards video by mccalli · · Score: 1
      Now, why on earth would you choose the latter over the former?

      iMovie.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    12. Re:Open-standards video by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      I guess hardly supported anywhere in Slashdot means: Won't play on Linux.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    13. Re:Open-standards video by dytin · · Score: 1

      Oh, so you weren't really looking for an open standard, you were just looking for an easy way to encode your movies. Not to flame or anything, but in all honesty, your parent poster makes a good point. If you really want to keep using quicktime, I would suggest using quicktime as well as DivX. Because DivX is just so much nicer, and I hate it when I have to open up my quicktime player just to play a little movie. Often times, I would just chose not to play the movie instead of being forced to open up quicktime. And, I don't know about iMovie, but every decent movie editor that I've used has given me the option of what I codec want to encode my movie with.

    14. Re:Open-standards video by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      I recently spotted something, a java complient streaming movie player, no codecs, no activex installation, just an applet.
      Its currently in use on the Yahoo entertainment news front page. The company who produces this applet and the encoder are here.
      I was more than a little shocked to discover this, but it seems a reasonable way to hit more people, though I didnt look deeply enough for compression rates or any of the other stuff it does say that any std webserver will suffice.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    15. Re:Open-standards video by mccalli · · Score: 1
      Oh, so you weren't really looking for an open standard, you were just looking for an easy way to encode your movies.

      Not so. Given that all ways lead to a non-open standard which won't be universally playable, I've chosen to settle on the one that gives me least hassle to produce.

      ...I don't know about iMovie, but every decent movie editor that I've used has given me the option of what I codec want to encode my movie with.

      iMovie produces Quicktime only, but combined with Quicktime Pro I can encode to whatever I choose. Well, except for .wmv from Quicktime Pro, but I can do .avi instead. The point is - I'm not gaining anything by converting. You're saying you won't open Quicktime Player to play it - fine, but an OS X-person would likely say they're not opening Windows Media Player for OS X to play it either. And neither of those standard clients will have access to a divx player by default. Swings and roundabouts.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    16. Re:Open-standards video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ian, you are the cheeriest person I know.

    17. Re:Open-standards video by mccalli · · Score: 1
      Ian, you are the cheeriest person I know.

      I aim to please... :-)

      Cheers,
      Ian

    18. Re:Open-standards video by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Well, that's Xine. I still say the best movie player for Windows is Knoppix. I can tinker with Windows and it's codecs for hours, and never can get it to the point where it can play back everything with no problems. Always a couple of strange videos or formats that won't play, and if I get those playing - somethink else stops working. On the other hand, Xine just works.

    19. Re:Open-standards video by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 1

      If WMP doesn't play standard MP4 files then MS needs to get their act together. This is industry standard stuff.

      MS? Industry standards??? Yeah...they'll just toss all those proprietary DRM file formats right in the trash and start following standards. Hell, maybe they'll even start GPLing their software too. Oh look, the pigs are starting to fly south for winter....

    20. Re:Open-standards video by anno1a · · Score: 1

      It plays on linux. Better than on windows IMO, since I can use mplayer, instead of quicktime player.

      --
      ------- I fumbled my registration and I now must suffer
    21. Re:Open-standards video by anno1a · · Score: 1

      Yes, but is it legal? And this only plays on i386 platforms AFAIK. Yes, mplayer can play it, and beautifully, but legally?

      --
      ------- I fumbled my registration and I now must suffer
  33. No holographs for you by SoVi3t · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't care how much you whine and cry, this won't be making any Star Wars style holographs. You could project a 2D image onto it, but a full 3D image (viewable from all angles), would likely be impossible. How would you manage to project images into all the crevices and such, and also how would you hold the fog in a specific shape?

    --
    Defender of Microsoft and Communism!!!
    1. Re:No holographs for you by sonicattack · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I thought about making 'real' holograms using this technology. It just _might_ be possible. I think that given enough motivation, and the right people working on this, there can be progress made in the right direction. Why am I hopeful? Well, your mentioning it being impossible motivated me a bit.. :)

      Now, I will let my imagination run wild and try to address the problems you mentioned. Even though I am no engineer, perhaps something resembling my ideas might be possible. First, holding the fog in its 'proper shape'. How about a system manipulating the airflow around the hologram? Heavy focused airflow. Or how about a magnetically charged fog, the outline of which easily modelled by means of surrounding electromagnetic fields? Crazy? I don't know. Television would have sounded like a pretty crazy idea too some hundred years ago. (...Doesn't prove I'm right, I know...)

      Secondly, creating the image? A system of lasers and mirrors (or something able to _quickly_ change the direction of the lightbeams) surrounding the projection?

      Now tell me I'm crazy!

    2. Re:No holographs for you by danila · · Score: 2, Interesting

      First, on average there are less than two eyes in a human. So you don't necessarily need the "hologram" do look correctly from all points of view, just from two. Second, the eyes are so close that sometimes you don't even need the stereo, the flat object can look 3D enough if you successfully use other cues (like place this "hologram" behind some objects and in front of others). Add to that eye tracking for the observer and you can dinamically adjust the picture for the the observer's position. If you can walk around the object, it would look sufficiently 3D.

      Of course, this will not allow the creation of a completely realistic illusion of a real 3D object, but it would still look cool.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    3. Re:No holographs for you by sploxx · · Score: 1

      Another idea:
      Stack multiple displays after each other and you have real 3D.
      Of course, the resolution in z axis is poor, but anyway...

    4. Re:No holographs for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sort of related, some games do this sort of thing. In some, for instance, you'll see trees that are the same texture, used on a Y shape, or an X/+, to make it look round, rather than just a single flat tree which turns to face you all the time.
      As long as you don't view it from above or below (or right next to it), it can look okay.

    5. Re:No holographs for you by Sherloqq · · Score: 1

      First, on average there are less than two eyes in a human

      What part of the world do you come from?? :)

      --
      Have EVDO, will travel.
    6. Re:No holographs for you by danila · · Score: 1

      Well, there are one-eyed people and there are eyeless people, but I have never heard about anyone who had 3 or more eyes. :-)

      P.S. Too bad that /. doesn't support Unicode well - I can't make a 3-eyed smiley. :(

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    7. Re:No holographs for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How about:
      .:)
  34. Ugh. by CGP314 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Interesting applications include walk-thru advertisements on shops or malls

    Great, just what the human race needs. Another way to display advertisements. I do my best to ignore them, but if I have to walk through an ad, it's going to be hard not to see it.

    1. Re:Ugh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine one of the applications, Billboard advertisements on the Highway - not beside it, On it. can you imagine a Huge Advertisement on the middle of the road . . . - 96 car pile up on the Freeway today, all because someone wanted to buy billboard space on the freeway . . .

    2. Re:Ugh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you can ignore an infinite amount of bright yellow ads and still notice the more subtle things in life. If this wasn't true then the people we see every day would be transforming into mindless media-fueled robots right before our eyes. That certainly isn't happening so giant ads everywhere must be fine.

      At least televisions still have "off" buttons, although they are getting smaller.

    3. Re:Ugh. by pomakis · · Score: 1
      I do my best to ignore them, but if I have to walk through an ad, it's going to be hard not to see it.

      That's exactly why it's seen as such a good media for advertisements. The ads can literally be "in your face".

  35. Done by peterpi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What, like what these guys have been doing for years?

    1. Re:Done by makapuf · · Score: 1

      for informatin this guys has been doing that since 10 years, outdoor, on falling water. I've seen this big show, pretty impressive.

    2. Re:Done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but they're French. They don't count.

    3. Re:Done by plaa · · Score: 1

      What, like what these guys have been doing for years?

      Could you be a bit more specific? I couldn't easily find any info on such a thing on the site. According to the other reply, they use water, so it's not so much of a walk-through screen.

      Both definitely have their applications (with water you can probably make larger screens and use them outdoors more easily), but they are distinctly different.

      --

      I doubt, therefore I may be.
    4. Re:Done by peterpi · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I couldn't decide whether my post was a troll or not, sorry.

      Futuroscope is a amusement park in France that is themed around the moving image. There are various interesting animation / television / 3d exhibits.

      In the evening they put on a show where they have screens made of fine water spray which they project onto. This is all done above the surface of a pond. The audience watch from about 15 meters away. The picture is ghost-like and amazing to see.

      The screens are large; around about 4 meters in width and height. The picture is nowhere near as sharp as a television, but it's enough to see what's going on.

    5. Re:Done by tcnc74 · · Score: 1

      What, like what these guys have been doing for years?
      Congratulations! This could be the worst (most useless) link in the history of Slashdot. BE MORE SPECIFIC and don't waste my time.

    6. Re:Done by Quikah · · Score: 1

      Disney does that as well at their Disney-MGM park for their Fantasmic show.

      --
      Q.
    7. Re:Done by peterpi · · Score: 1
      Browse at 3.

      I think you'll find this is the worst link in the history of Slashdot.

  36. Possible Use for it! by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Funny

    How about using a giant outdoor mist-screen to show flickery 8mm. movies of ghosts &c. from a concealed projector, in order to scare away the residents from an old village where you have been secretly conducting a highly lucrative but probably illegal operation, so they won't nick your money / grass you up?

    Oh, wait, I think this might have been done before .....

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    1. Re:Possible Use for it! by Jonsey · · Score: 1

      And if it weren't for you meddling kids, I would've gotten away with it.

      --
      I assert that my comment is only my opinion, not that of any employer, past, present or future.
    2. Re:Possible Use for it! by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      How about using a giant outdoor mist-screen to show flickery 8mm. movies of ghosts from a concealed projector, in order to scare away the residents from an old village where you have been secretly conducting a highly lucrative but probably illegal operation, so they won't nick your money / grass you up?

      Oh, wait, I think this might have been done before .....


      And they would've gotten away with it if it weren't for those blasted kids.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
  37. been there, done that... by hangingonwords · · Score: 1

    i made a fog screen once in my friends basement... some marijuana smoke and laser pointers, i was in fog screen heaven...

    --
    fact: microsoft > linux
  38. Just like Seaquest by Snaller · · Score: 1, Redundant

    ... remember that? They projected a hologram on what look like a stream of vapor from the celing - very clever, even if looks a bit crappy *G*

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:Just like Seaquest by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      Was it just Seaquest? I thought I saw it in Babylon 5 too.

    2. Re:Just like Seaquest by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Hm... I don't recall that. I remembr that flyboy from second season had a hologram thingy, but it seemed to just project into thin air. The one in SeaQuest was more "realistic" since the air was quite full of... whatever it was they where blowing :)

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  39. No Fog by GregoryD · · Score: 2, Funny
    I don't want a screen. I want images implanted into my brain before my lifetime is over. I want the screen to be my vision, an interactive custom 3D reality.

    Then I can realize my dream, Brittney Spears backup dancer. And after the show... she leads me by the hand to her dressing room... errrrm

    I mean to play Quake 10, yeah, thats it. Quake.

    1. Re:No Fog by Biomechanoid · · Score: 1

      I want images implanted into my brain before my lifetime is over.

      You mean like an X server? Good luck with the configuration.

    2. Re:No Fog by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Funny

      I want images implanted into my brain before my lifetime is over.

      That's easily solved: www.goatse.cx

      Watch that picture for a few hours straight, and I'm sure that image will be implanted into your brain until your lifetime is over.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    3. Re:No Fog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I 0wned Britney Spears at Quake 3 once...at least, that's what the screen name said. She had a pretty impressive ping considering she's supposed to be on AOL ;-)

    4. Re:No Fog by lommer · · Score: 1

      Watch that picture for a few hours straight...

      A few hours!? All it took was a fraction of a second before it was imprinted in my mind. Yuk...

    5. Re:No Fog by cfuse · · Score: 1
      Watch that picture for a few hours straight, and I'm sure that image will be implanted into your brain until your lifetime is over.

      I must have a real low tolerance, it only took me 2 seconds and I'm still having flashbacks.

  40. Been done before. by NeoTron · · Score: 1

    Seaquest, DSV, had something exactly like that - it was one of the teenage-hero-brat's "mentor" display.

    1. Re:Been done before. by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 1
      So what if it was on Seaquest, DSV, why does that mean it has been done before?

      Seaquest, DSV was a TV show, wasn't it?

  41. I want my own Holodeck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Then maybe I can have my own virtual pamela anderson that I can... erm nevermind.

    1. Re:I want my own Holodeck by Biomechanoid · · Score: 1

      ..that I can

      Research and Develop? But please share the source.

  42. done before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't yer man on seaquest dsv have one of these?

  43. Ah, I've got it! by clambake · · Score: 3, Funny

    So, combine this with adaptive camouflage and you've got yourself an invisible secret lair from which to lauch evil plans. Super villiany is finally feasible, and just in time for Arnold to win the Governorship to do battle with, sweet!

  44. Great for laptops by finapi · · Score: 1

    This will be very handy in laptops. Fog is lightweight and it does not break. I hope it does not need too much battery power.

  45. In Soviet Russia... by asn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...fog walks through you!

  46. WTF Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why?

  47. Dupe by ralphclark · · Score: 1

    *sigh* ... Now we know how slow do things have to get before Slashdot is reduced to reposting last year's tech news.

  48. leafblowers by RMH101 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think you could make a pretty decent mockery of any billboard using this with a leafblower...or an industrial vacuum: "hey, mcdonalds! you *suck*"

    1. Re:leafblowers by Kompressor · · Score: 1

      Leafblower version: "hey, mcdonalds! i *blow*"

      *ducks* ;-P

      --
      kmem russian roulette: Aquillar> dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/kmem bs=1 count=1 seek=$RANDOM
  49. Environmental issues by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

    It's a cool idea, but aren't the particles rather unhealthy if a dust is used, and wouldn't it take a lot of energy usage to produce a vapour (e.g. dry ice requires refrigeration)?

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    1. Re:Environmental issues by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      I was at SIGGRAPH and I've been paying attention to this since before /. posted it last year...it's water. The unit requires simply a water feed and electrical supply. They are trying to sell the initial units for about $100k

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  50. Re: Mirror by Dougie · · Score: 0

    Not that they will need it...

    http://www.dark-hill.co.uk/www.cs.tut.fi/%257Eir a/ wave.html

    --
    Doug.
  51. Advertising... by heironymouscoward · · Score: 1

    Given that one of the largest consumers of big flat panel TVs (JCDecaux in Europe anyhow) is the advertising businesses, it's a sensible proposal. I can imagine that the fog screen would be very striking in airports, as the travellers on rolling carpets are carried right up to and then through the screen. Whap!!

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:Advertising... by fbjon · · Score: 1
      Yes! Now I can read my game walk-throughs properly!

      Seriously though, wouldn't this be much cheaper than a huge flatscreen, in fact? It could be placed along a wall,
      so the screen doesn't take up any space, you can place chairs and benches below it etc.

      Also, I'm guessing that the fluttering problem would be solved if encased in clear plastic. But then
      you'd lose the cool walk-through, of course.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  52. Companion Security Breach by Bugmaster · · Score: 1

    Whoa, I thought only the Taelons were supposed to have this technology ! But hmm, now that I think about it, Da'an's screen is actually crappier-looking than this... Go humans go !

    --
    >|<*:=
  53. Seaquest Doctor? by MGrie · · Score: 1

    ummm... I think the visual effect of the "holographic" Doctor/Shrink in Seaquest DSV was created by projecting the image of him on a wall of smoke that was sucked across the room in a stream of air.

    It actually was a pretty nice effect to get that translucent, wavy look without any CGI.

  54. A huge break through... by thepacketmaster · · Score: 1

    for haunted houses and castles everywhere when those damn ghosts don't want to co-operate.

    --

    --

    Luck is just skill you didn't know you had.

  55. Seaquest DSV? by browman · · Score: 1

    I'm sure they had one of these on that show... a genuine one at that...

    I can't even remember how many years ago that was...

    --
    You fool! You've given cheese to a lactose intolerant volcano god! Do you know what that means?
  56. This reminds me.... by koa · · Score: 1

    This sorta thing reminds me of a failed experiment some freinds and I worked on a couple years ago. I had just got a fog machine and a projector, so we decided to make a video screen. We went to Home Depot to get the materials: rolls of plastic, wood, screws, and hinges and etc.. We essentially made a box that was 8 feet high, 8 feet wide, and 3 feet deep covered in a thin layer of plastic. Upon filling this monstrosity with fog, we realised it didnt really work- too much turbulance.

    So we turned it into a really nice fish-bowl. *of the smoking variety* :)

    --
    ....move along....nothing to see here....
  57. nothing new..... by duber007 · · Score: 1

    This has been done before by several consulting groups specializing in water feature design for themes parks, etc....example (not with fog, but full water droplets) at Canada's Wonderland (in Toronto) a few years ago - we used a very large wide fan jet to create a screen, on which a Disney special feature was projected using standard equipment....

  58. Spinal Tap flashback by PizzaFace · · Score: 1

    I can never see a mime without flashing back to the reception scene with the mime waiters in This Is Spinal Tap, with boss mime Billy Crystal snapping at Dana Carvey, "Come one, don't talk back, mime is money, let's go, move it!"

    1. Re:Spinal Tap flashback by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I can never see a mime without having flashbacks to the video of a mime that played everytime I started up my Packard Bell 486. That was until I figured out how to disable Packard Bell's Navigator program, and changed the thing to boot to the Windows 3.1 desktop instead.

      It would be interesting to see that again. I seem to recall it played smoothly, though a sluggish 486 wouldn't be up to the task of playing a MPEG1 file? I recall the file was like 45MB, which was *huge* on it's tiny harddrive.

  59. mirrors by kasper37 · · Score: 1
  60. Unreal Tournament by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It reminds me of some of the dynamic textures in Unreal Tournament, like someone changed the fire to look like Mona Lisa.

  61. Compatibility by Seft · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing this wont be compatible with the Geforce FX 5800 then........

  62. It's been done before by sakusha · · Score: 0

    This is an old idea. I've seen outdoor "Laserium" style shows, projected onto huge fog-fountains on barges on a lake. The barges were lined up in a row, each one sprayed out a flat semicircle of fine water particles, when lined up together they made a strip of solid "screen" about 50 feet high. They laser-projected animations on the wide strip across the lake. Then they ran fireworks from barges even farther out on the lake. It was way cool.

  63. Uses in the home gym... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Now when you work out with your aerobics instructor, she really is an air head...

  64. Re:MOD THE PARENT -1 TROLL by MrBlint · · Score: 0

    Yeah, why?

    --
    That's very perceptive of you Mr Stapleton and rather unexpected in a G Major
  65. RTFA by chthonicdaemon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a new prototype, unveiled in July 2003. A revisit instead of a new post.

    Now go flame the guys posting dupes of a new Mozilla release.

    --
    Languages aren't inherently fast -- implementations are efficient
    1. Re:RTFA by iamhassi · · Score: 1
      Mozilla is software, and new versions of software can add many new features, bug fixes, new interface, etc.

      This is a LCD projector shining onto a fog. There's not many new "features" you can add to fog, not to mention the pictures don't look any different than they did last year. Here's the archieve of the first version:
      http://web.archive.org/web/20020620143522/http://w ww.cs.tut.fi/~ira/wave.html

      Like I said, not that different. Yes, it's clearer, but still looks like a projector on a fog to me.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  66. Oh brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What next, edible keyboards? Honestly, this has to be one of the dumbest ideas I've heard of in a long time. And in this business, that's saying a LOT.

  67. DivX is the only acceptable format by QuantumG · · Score: 1

    To use anything is unexcusable.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:DivX is the only acceptable format by falcon5768 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      BLECH, I have yet to see a decent DivX player that doenst crash half the time MPG4 thankyou.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    2. Re:DivX is the only acceptable format by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      What Windows Media Player aint good enough for ya? Or are you actually one of the few here that actually *use* Linux.. In which case, get Xine, it's a great piece of software, and the source code is actually readable! (if you care).

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:DivX is the only acceptable format by falcon5768 · · Score: 1

      Actually windows media is a peice of crap bloatware on the same level as quicktime player, and I actually run OS X which has a decoder but honestly everything I have seen even encoded in DivX has been shitty quality at best

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  68. Doesn't Disney do something similar.... by Alpha27 · · Score: 1

    ... with their haunted mansion ride?

    1. Re:Doesn't Disney do something similar.... by irving47 · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I don't remember the haunted mansion part, but in their MGM park, they have an interesting laser/light show that they use fountains spewing out lots of mist that they project video onto.

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    2. Re:Doesn't Disney do something similar.... by Aidtopia · · Score: 1

      I don't think there is an effect like this in the Haunted Mansion. You may be thinking of projections onto theatrical scrim, but that's more like fabric than fog. They do use lights and scrim in several places to simulate fog.

      However, there is an effect like this in the Indiana Jones attraction at Disneyland. At one point you drive through a wall of fog onto which is projected a bunch of rats. This has been around for years. I'm assuming the one described in the article in an improvement by making the fog screen "smoother."

      Disney also has several attractions that project onto water screens (notably Fantasmic! at Disneyland). If I recall this system was licensed from a French inventor.

    3. Re:Doesn't Disney do something similar.... by Amgine007 · · Score: 1

      >However, there is an effect like this in the
      >Indiana Jones attraction at Disneyland. At one
      >point you drive through a wall of fog onto which is
      >projected a bunch of rats.

      close, but not quite. the projection is used to create the illusion that you are driving through a spider web -- not a bunch of rats. simple, too: just uses spots of white light and no light to illuminate the thin fog in to a webby shape.

      probably the best effect on that ride, along with the dart room.

      based on the patents disney holds for effects in the haunted mansion (eg the singing bust projection technique, others?) i'm a bit surprised there isn't more discussion of the disney factor..

    4. Re:Doesn't Disney do something similar.... by Aidtopia · · Score: 1

      The spider web effect is different. The rat effect doesn't always work, so perhaps you haven't seen it. Others in the thread have also pointed out the rat effect.

      Given the age of the Haunted Mansion, I don't think Disney has many patents left on the original effects. However, they have patented updates to old effects. The Madame Leota crystal ball illusion has been upgraded to an internal video projection transmitted by fiber optics. Apparently, however, they have had problems keeping it working and have occasionally switched back to the external periscope projector. They have patented an improvement to the busts that follow your movements, making the illusion effective over a wider viewing angle. I don't think they've modified the ones at Disneyland, but perhaps the HMs at other Disney parks are sporting the upgrade.

    5. Re:Doesn't Disney do something similar.... by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      Their Indiana Jones ride uses it as well, to create the illusion of rats jumping down onto the ride vehicle passengers. It was a fun experience, but the lines are long and it's over in just a few seconds.

  69. Ya know, I think.... by StressGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wile E. Coyote could have actually caught the Road Runner with one of these things.

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  70. You forget this is /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    We reflexively bash Ashcroft, call W. stupid, hate everything political that's not far to the left of a salad fork, and can't spell SCO without being spotted the "S" and the "C".

    Occam's Razor says these traits are all related...

  71. Inspired by Last Starfighter? by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 2, Informative

    In The Last Starfighter , Alex Rogan's mentor "Grig" described the technology used for displaying their heads up display.

    Basically he said it was produced by projecting images onto a field of xeon gas. (Or something along those lines. Anyone care to refresh my memory?)

    Seems to me like these guys got their inspiration from the movies. :)

  72. I've got a better idea.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not make a bead curtain out of RGB led's and have a display controller light it up like a really big lcd screen (or lite-brite ;) It would satisfy hippies and geeks simultaneously!!!

  73. Heck with amusement parks... by mblase · · Score: 1

    I wanna know when they're going to implement these things in our homes and workplaces, like the comm-screens that pop up in midair in "Martian Successor Nadesico."

    On the other hand, that might not be so great. The last thing I want is for my mom or boss to materialize right in front of my computer screen while I'm in the middle of enjoying some really good... er, browsing Slashdot.

  74. My newest peripheral: by roelbj · · Score: 5, Funny

    My vacuum cleaner is now a screen capture utility! Can I get a Hoover with USB?

    1. Re:My newest peripheral: by isorox · · Score: 1

      Dont get the Microsoft one - it'll be the only thing they make that doesnt suck!

    2. Re:My newest peripheral: by GQuon · · Score: 1

      My vacuum cleaner is now a screen capture utility! Can I get a Hoover with USB?

      Yes. USB solutions are now available for the Amiga.

      --
      Irene KHAAAAAAN!
    3. Re:My newest peripheral: by zoloto · · Score: 1

      Yeah but I'm sure the resolution will suck...

    4. Re:My newest peripheral: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol! suck!

  75. Two sided display? by PSaltyDS · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder how well a laminar flow smoke curtain would do with images projected on BOTH sides? The cool effect I imagine is walking down a corridor with several of these screens crossing it. As you walk through the image of a wall with a door in it, you turn around and see the image of the other side of the "wall". Look forward again and you see the next "wall", which you can also walk through to see what's on the other side. The series of images could give a tourist a walk right through a virtual pryramid, or some other interesting tour, like the entrance hall in the opening sequence of 'Get Smart' or MST3K.

    ...think of a sig, quick! Oh no! Too late... arrrrrgh!!!

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. - Geek's corollary to Clarke's law
  76. Image Quality. by aliens · · Score: 1

    I agree, I don't quite understand what's so great about this, grab an LCD projector and you'd be surprised at where you can put an image. I guess it's cool how they figure how to make fog come out of high powered jets so it's thick enough for an image to work on.

    THe movies were very underwhelming.

    --
    -- taking over the world, we are.
  77. Hope They Are Looking for Outdoor Markets by RhettLivingston · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Because the load on the air conditioning for removing all of that humidity from an indoor setup will be huge.

    1. Re:Hope They Are Looking for Outdoor Markets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm late on this, but I was vacationing.

      I was at the Siggraph demonstration, and basically there was a vent system directly below the curtain which sucked the fumes away.

      It was an interesting display, and the 'curtain' was certainly more stable than anything else I had seen before - but it's still a projected image, and people's outlines blocking the projector still means you can't just 'walk around' the display.

      I thought there was more interesting things at the show there, personally - HDR displays, automatic person-tracking for spot lighting (or anything, really), many haptic systems, infra-red keyer.. to name a few.
      Along with goofball applications like a full-body Theremin device - *rolls eyes*

  78. Disney's Done Dis (Sorta) by CrazyLegs · · Score: 1

    Disney has used a (sorta) similar technology in their DisneyWorld (Disney Studios) show called 'Fantasmic'. Rather than generating fog and the air-stream to keep it in line, the Disney approach sprays a wall of fine mist from the ground up. Film and laser animation are then projected onto this curtain. I don't have any good idea of the size of curtain they produce, but it seems huge - i.e. two of these curtains are used for an audience of approx. 10,000 people.

    --

    CrazyLegs

    "Pork!!" said the Fish, and we all laughed.

  79. Wait a Minute... by Matt_Fisher · · Score: 1

    I think this is a plot to get porn attics closer to there images and video.. Thats so smart kudos to you guys!

    --
    --Matt Fisher
    1. Re:Wait a Minute... by boogy+nightmare · · Score: 1

      damn..

      you must have a shed load of pr)n to need an entire attic to store it in...

      can i come round some time :)

      i assume you meant addict ?

      s

      --
      Kingdom of Loathing (www.kingdomofloathing.com) Addicted is me
  80. Not Smoke, Fog... by virg_mattes · · Score: 4, Informative

    > Wonder if you're able to breath in the room when this smoke is there for a couple of hours.

    It's not smoke, it's fog. The difference is that it's not going to hang around after it leaves the laminar airflow, because it's opaque vaporized stuff (fog), not particles suspended in air (smoke). There are lots of materials that one can use to create non-persistent fog that isn't water vapor, much like the fog used in nightclubs. It'll just dissipate when it gets out of the laminar airflow.

    Virg

    1. Re:Not Smoke, Fog... by neoform · · Score: 2, Interesting

      heh, the fog in nightclubs lingers for at least 10 minutes after released, then afterwards (if used enought) the whole place smells like fog juice.

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    2. Re:Not Smoke, Fog... by mboots · · Score: 1

      I actually designed and built a system like this last year for my high school production of "The Wizard of OZ". The wizard's (Flash-animated) image was projected onto this wall of vapor, which we created by piping fog from a commercial machine like you see in dance clubs through a piece of ABS pipe with a slit down the length of it. I wish I had pictures, it looked really spooky and almost as clear as what these guys have done. Too bad I didn't patent it ;) However, we did have some problems with the fog filling up the stage and choking the actors, so we had to make the scenes quite short. It doesn't dissipate quite as well as you say it should.

    3. Re:Not Smoke, Fog... by LudditeMind · · Score: 1

      because it's opaque vaporized stuff (fog), not particles suspended in air (smoke).

      Fog isn't particles of water(i.e. stuff) suspended in air? Could have fooled me. Remember that water vapor is above 100 degrees fahrenheit which would make it quite uncomfortable to walk through. Here's a quote from the article.

      The basic components of the screen are a laminar, non-turbulent airflow, and a thin fog screen (or any particles) injected into and inside a laminar flow.

      Notice the how they mention particles.

    4. Re:Not Smoke, Fog... by NichG · · Score: 2, Informative

      The difference between fog and water vapor is that in fog, the water has formed small droplets of fluid which are suspended in the air, as opposed to a uniform mixture of water and air (or pure water vapor in extreme cases). Those droplets scatter light, and you get an opaque screen. However, those droplets convert to water vapor as long as the humidity isn't near saturation for that temperature, and the fog dissipates. Water vapor does not have to be at 100C (or even 100F) ; 100C is the point at which the vapor state dominates, but you get a fraction of vapor supported at lower temperatures (the vapor pressure of a substance).

      If you used water in the machine, the simple solution would be to keep the room's humidity low, so that the fog dissipates more quickly. Either way, damage to the people in the room would be no worse than breathing the air on a foggy day.

      NichG

    5. Re:Not Smoke, Fog... by lommer · · Score: 1

      Hrm, I would guess that laminar airflow is something like a sheet of moving air, but could someone please provide a concise definition of laminar airflow and how it is achieved for those of us who don't know our aerodynamics as well?

  81. Umm.. it's been done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to rain on anyone's parade, but does anyone remember a sci-fi show called "Sea Quest"? Big multi-colored guy named Dagwood (yes, after the sandwhich), futuristic submarine that is shaped like a fish, and a "talking" dolphin? Anywho, the captin quite frequently talked with a digital representation of some older captin (it was an AI) that was projected onto a - you guessed it - screen of fog... And on the show the projector was above the fog shooting at an extremely steep angle so you almost couldn't get in the way of the image....

    Anywho, just thought I would point that out (and btw, sea quest was around back in the early to mid 90's....)

    Peace

  82. Glass Doors by the9thbit · · Score: 1

    Great so now we have transparent glass doors we walk into and opaqe screens we can walk through.

    --
    Put your money where your mouth is -
  83. Major old technology by rjw57 · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you cast your mind back to the 'hologram' in the Captains cabin in the original Seaquest DSV, that used /exactly/ this technology.

    --
    Rich
  84. Old Stuff: HoloTouch? by sICE · · Score: 1
    "Their next idea is to use the fog as a touch-screen, making it even more accessible."

    R. Douglas McPheters already patented the HoloTouch.
  85. if by similar you mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the same thing, and for 20+ years, then you are correct.

  86. Correction by Xformer · · Score: 1

    Grandparent = Funny
    Parent = Troll

    --
    All I want is a kind word, a warm bed and unlimited power.
  87. Sentosa musical fountain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know it's not quite the same thing, but the musical fountain on Sentosa island (Singapore) has been doing some pretty impressive video & laser projection onto water spray for a while :) It certainly had me impressed.

    Of course, you might get a little wet when trying to walk through a water mist screen, and it's probably not too practical for indoor situations :)

  88. Disenyland already has this by ShawnDoc · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Hate to brake it to these geeks, but they've obviously never been to Disneyland. The Indiana Jones ride has had this technology for years. A fog screen is created and then it has projected on it the moving image of rats running along a log and dropping off. Your jeep then drives through the screen, scaring women who are afraid of rats.

    (Some days it works really well, some days it doesn't.)

    1. Re:Disenyland already has this by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

      You know, I could never quite make out what was going on there-- I know the screen you are talking about, and it was a start as you run right into it, but I really couldn't make out what the image was that was being projected onto it. Rats, huh. Cool... I'll try to see if I can make it out next time...

  89. i ALSO saw it at siggraph last week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and it was bloody silent. i specifically asked about those fans and they don't even make a whisper. those things would be perfect in my computer, very hush hush. They only plan to build 10 of these at 100 K per.

  90. projecting in 3D by mozkill · · Score: 1

    can you project in 3D? it seems that a fog screen should allow you do do this because it could have depth to it, right?

    --

    -- Betting on the survival of the media industry is a serious risk. I advise investing elsewhere.
  91. Touch screen? by Drakonian · · Score: 1

    Where did you get the bit about the touch screen? I didn't see that on the page. How would it work?

    --
    Random is the New Order.
  92. Cloud adverts are mostly illegal by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    Projecting advertisements onto clouds is prohibited in most countries, since way back when some assholes thought it would be cool to write laser adverts on clouds above the cities, it spurned very hasty, world-wide legislation to stop this visual polution. This screen system therefore would have some difficulties...

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  93. SeaQuest DSV anyone? by Njall · · Score: 1

    I hate to be a prior art party pooper; but the idea was, in my experience, first shown in the lamentable TV series "SeaQuest DSV" in the early'ish 1990's. As I recall the ships computer and video phone used a "dropping fog" display. Whether the display was interactive is moot as that is not unique.

  94. Fog Doors by n1ywb · · Score: 1

    I think it would be really cool to make doors out of fog. Presumably they'd still allow some air to flow through the doorway, and obviously sound could travel through, but they'd provide a bit more visual privacy than say bead curtains.

    --
    -73, de n1ywb
    www.n1ywb.com
  95. Not really new by MrIcee · · Score: 2, Informative
    ... this is not really a new idea or application. In one of the expo's the pepsi (I think it was pepsi) pavillion was a geodesic dome. They lined the entire dome with stainless steel tubes with very small holes drilled in it (it took them quite awhile to determine he exact size). The idea being that forcing very clean water through the tubes and very small holes would produce fog.

    The entire structure, thus, was totally covered in fog - and they used both lasers and video projectors to color and animate the surface.

    And anyway... what, nobody ever thought of shineing a video or slide projector (or laser) at fog before. Geezesus.

  96. This isn't a new idea... by iceT · · Score: 1

    Hello!?!? Captains Quarters aboard SeaQuest: DSV. Old geezer shows up on a screen made of downward projected fog.

    Now, if they had blasted the fog upwards, then THAT would have been news!

    --
    -- You can't idiot-proof anything, because they're always coming out with better idiots.
    1. Re:This isn't a new idea... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      That is what exactly I was thinking when I saw that. I guess that is one prediction that is about right.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  97. last year? how can you tell? by ThwartedEfforts · · Score: 1

    How can you tell it's from last year? Slashdot has never had the year displayed in any of the dates. And apparently this isn't considered a bug or even an oversight.

    1. Re:last year? how can you tell? by BrianS · · Score: 1

      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/08/045522 2&mode=thread&tid=137&tid=196

      The year of the article is in the Story ID number. The SID of this article is 03/08/03/055222. Year 03, month 08, day 08, id 055222.

      --
      -- I can't say enough in 120 chars!
    2. Re:last year? how can you tell? by SeanAhern · · Score: 1
      Slashdot has never had the year displayed in any of the dates.

      Uhh...your post looks like this to me:
      last year? how can you tell? (Score:1)
      by ThwartedEfforts (2976) on 08:15 AM -- Friday August 08 2003 (#6645304)
      How can you tell it's from last year? Slashdot has never had the year displayed in any of the dates. And apparently this isn't considered a bug or even an oversight.
      Emphasis mine. The display format of a date is a preference setting. Look under "Homepage".
  98. Done in Vegas 7 years ago too... by statusbar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It has also been done in Vegas 8 years ago at the MGM Grand Hotel's EFX show (now defunct):

    I was one of the designers of a MIDI Show Control-to-Allen-Bradley PLC controller specifically designed for this show. The EFX show used dozens of them. These boxes in turn were controlled by Amigas! by Richmod Sound Design's software.

    The fog wall in the show was huge, and they would project a scene onto the fog while the actors and props would be moved into place. Then the fog would dissipate and the projected 'scene' would come to life.

    --jeffy++

    --
    ipv6 is my vpn
  99. Wile E. Coyote uses by sacrilicious · · Score: 2, Funny
    The fog screen enables many novel applications indoors. Interesting applications include walk-thru advertisements on shops or malls, or a walk-thru screen in world-class museums, corporate showrooms, trade fairs, theme parks, special events, spas, theatres, science centers, lobbies, etc.... We will also present some intriguing new concepts later.

    One of our favorite uses: an image that people can walk through which looks just like a solid brick wall... exactly six inches in front of a real brick wall. Get your webcams ready.

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    1. Re:Wile E. Coyote uses by Trinn · · Score: 1

      actually, rather than making a trap like that, I'd prefer someone stuck a mist-brick-wall between platforms 9 & 10 at a rather famous train station. Love to see the look on everyone's faces when you finally find 9&3/4.

  100. Great by umrgregg · · Score: 1

    So now annoying teenagers can add hand-held fans on TOP of laser pointers as a way to disturb a movie. Fantastic.

    --
    NMG
  101. Scooby-Dooby-Doo!!! by Anomylous+Howard · · Score: 1

    The bad guys from Scooby-Doo have been doing this for 30 years!!
    That's how all those "ghosts" fly.

  102. I wonder how loud it is. by Cranx · · Score: 1

    I wonder how loud it is.

  103. Minority Report 3D by Teahouse · · Score: 1

    If you can create a "bent" or curved flow, you could create 3D images (at least from one side) with this technology. You could replay videos and project them on to the mist with pretty decent laser resolution. It's the whole "Help me Obi Wan Kenobi, you're my only hope" only in full size.

    --
    "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect."- Steven Wright
  104. That's neat! But I claim prior art. by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
    It's a VERY interesting way to get a projection screen that doesn't block traffic, for a fast exit from a movie house, or a less expensive way to have a large screen.

    As to the prior art, thye are not the first to have used fog as a screen. Many years ago we took a slide projector out to the riverbottom on a foggy night, right after the bars closed, and projected images onto the fogbank hanging near the road. A still of Godzilla got little response, but projecting a scantily clad barbarian maiden almost caused a wreck.

  105. No problem by ShadyG · · Score: 1

    All you really need to do to fix the turbulence problem is to make two large panes of glass, the size of your intended display area. Hang them parallel and let the gas flow between them. The glass protects the fog from the surrounding air.

  106. This isn't exactly new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We folks in the live theatre world have been doing EXACTLY this for a couple of years now, as well as finding other ways to project still or moving images 'into thin air'. These guys simpy turned into a product one of the myriad ways which this has been done in the past...

    Must admit, the touchscreen claim intrigues me...

  107. Making money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a Finn I sincerely hope that these guys can actually turn their invention to money. Besides Nokia, Finnish inventors and companies in general have failed in this -- even if they really had something valuable in their hands.

  108. First-hand experiences by E_elven · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is actually a repost from a few months back. I first saw it when they demoed it at an IT convention in Helsinki -the pictures don't quite tell the truth about the quality of the image, it's in fact a lot more stable and crisp than it might seem -and sticking your hand was neat, too, although it got me into trouble actually punching one of those ancient solid-monitors we still have at the office :) Anyway, from what I've heard (haven't been around there for a while), the quality has gotten even better nowadays. I wouldn't really start speculating about holographic displays yet. It's just 'cool.'

    --
    Marxist evolution is just N generations away!
  109. Are they using a projector? by soft_guy · · Score: 1

    OK, I get the fog, but is the image being created with a projector? If so, what kind? Is it just a standard front projector? How bright?

    (I'm currently working for InFocus, so I've become more conscious of projectors lately and their nuances.)

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  110. but... by sps_cs · · Score: 1

    is there a smog screen variant for los angeles residents?

  111. On a serious, yet funny note... by MasterSLATE · · Score: 1

    Ever seen the virtual *sex act* videos where they try to make it like you're the recipient?

    This technology brings virtual sex to a new level....

    --

    [sig]www.masterslate.org[/sig]
  112. Old seaQuest SFX by smaart · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who remembers this exact same thinge on seaQuest DSV. The show sucked and all but give credit where it's due.

    1. Re:Old seaQuest SFX by smaart · · Score: 1

      Seaquest, Disney, MGM Grand. Did these guys not know about these previous applications or are they hoping nobody remembers?

  113. Kids in the hall? by MLoff · · Score: 1

    In that video clip, I swear I saw Mark McKinney as Darrill, the artsy loser, from the kids in the hall. Maybe it's just the ponytail.

  114. Not Vapor... STEAM by Tmack · · Score: 1
    Vapor/fog is just small water particles suspended in air. Same as what clouds are. It forms when the temperature hits the Dewpoint, or other conditions are changed such that the dewpoint becomes the current temp (dewpoint=temp when clouds form). Coulds most certainly are not 100deg F, and neither is Fog (ground-level cloud cover). When the temp hits 100(at sea-level, less at higher altitude), water turns to steam, which is actually transparent, and is itself a GAS (ie: not particles suspended in air). If you actually RTFA you might have played either video, in which the guys are actually walking through (and doing other strange stuff in) the screen.

    TM

    --
    Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
  115. For Beneath the surface, lies the future. by Kalidor · · Score: 1

    Any one else remeber seaQuest DSV?

    Not the third season but the original first season with the computer display/holographic advisor in Capt. Nathan Bridgers quarters?

    yeah .. sounds familiar now, eh?

    --

    Code softly but carry a big magnet.

  116. dont blame DivX for your lame warezing skills by QuantumG · · Score: 1

    Go get a good DVD ripper, encode the movie at the "high quality" rate using the OpenDivX4 codec, wait 4 hours, play.. now look at the size of the movie.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  117. Just Like On Seaquest by iLeader · · Score: 1

    This is just like that computer on Seaquest: DSV that the Captain would talk to