Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Astronaut Makes It Back Safely

brindafella writes "SpaceDaily is reporting that China's historic first manned space mission has ended with the safe return of its first astronaut Lieutenant Colonel Yang Liwei, 38, who landed just before 6.30am Beijing time (2230 UTC 15/10) at the designated recovery zone north east of Beijing. The capsule has been recovered and opened and the pilot is very much alive, 'and doing autographs.' Furthermore, 'Premier Wen Jiabao was seen on television talking to Yang on the phone and smiling widely and clapping after he hung up.'"

540 comments

  1. I wonder by chadamir · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    so who do you think is going to be the first to jump at declaring it a hoax?

    1. Re:I wonder by michaelhood · · Score: 1

      Me.

    2. Re:I wonder by Procyon101 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Nope, it was me ;)

    3. Re:I wonder by dakryx · · Score: 1

      Even Nasa congratulated china on its first manned launch, and trust me they have the equipment to know if the launch really happened

    4. Re:I wonder by Stonent1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      so who do you think is going to be the first to jump at declaring it a hoax?

      I vote for the Iraqi Information Minister...

    5. Re:I wonder by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

      Why??? He'll be paraded like a hero and used for propaganda and, given China's capitalistic drive today, to endorse products. :-)

      --
      EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    6. Re:I wonder by jmcharry · · Score: 1

      So you think they really got him out of one of their prisons?

    7. Re:I wonder by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

      That's the OTHER Yang, who died in prison the same day and was cremated on the spot. This one is an upright, moral, 100% Hans Chinese, educated at Qinghua University, indocrinated with Communist ideology, but with an eye towards advancement and growth. It's all in his records... ;-)

      --
      EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    8. Re:I wonder by l810c · · Score: 1
      It wasn't a hoax, but they barely avoided disaster.

      At the last moment they noticed that instead of the Shenzhou V, they had pulled the Grand Golden Dragon Astral Festival that they had been saving for Chinese New Year out of the hanger.

    9. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      NASA also has the equipment to know if their own lunar landing really happened. If the NASA lunar landing is a hoax, NASA may have to participate in another country's hoax in order to protect their own hoax.

      There is no such thing as a conspiracy theory which is too simple nor one too complicated.

    10. Re:I wonder by rifter · · Score: 1

      "so who do you think is going to be the first to jump at declaring it a hoax?"

      I vote for the Iraqi Information Minister...

      There are no Chinese in space. Never! --Muhammed Saeed al-Sahaf

  2. Yay! :D by Fortyseven · · Score: 1

    Congrats, dude.

    1. Re:Yay! :D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank God ! We can finally expect a chinese menu in the future in space.

  3. Whens the next mission by The+Famous+Druid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thats the problem with Chinese space missions, as soon as one has landed, you want another.

    --
    Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum videtur (anything said in Latin sounds important)
    1. Re:Whens the next mission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats the problem with Chinese space missions, as soon as one has landed, you want another.

      Unlike space shuttle missions naturaly: as soon as one has blown up, you don't want to have another for at least a year.

      Anonymous Cowards Unite

    2. Re:Whens the next mission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Golly that was funny. You really dug deep for that, didn't ya.

    3. Re:Whens the next mission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should know; you posted it.

    4. Re:Whens the next mission by whereiswaldo · · Score: 0


      The problem with Chinese space missions: they all look the same.

    5. Re:Whens the next mission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other news, N*Sync member Lance Bass has decided to go to China to train for his space mission. Details at 11.

    6. Re:Whens the next mission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with American space missions: they all look the same.

      Cheers,

      George Wang

    7. Re:Whens the next mission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think if you're a member of N*Sync, you're "out there" enough as it is. No need to go zooming off into space.

    8. Re:Whens the next mission by perdelucena · · Score: 1

      They did it just to have a better view of their "great wall". You know, before anyone actually seens it with their own eyes, how can you tell thats really there and its actually great ?

    9. Re:Whens the next mission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez, lighten up, people! Listen to George Carlin if you think this is offensive.

  4. The Problem by Ken@WearableTech · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The problem with Chinese space launches is that 30 minutes later, you want to send a guy up again.

  5. FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FP?

  6. Re:First to say it by pointzero · · Score: 1

    So we never went to the moon, never sent the Hubble in space and are not building a space station (which you can see flying around at night). Oh and that time when I was at NASA, the shuttle lift-off was only my imagination. Either YOU are smoking something, or I'm smoking something.

  7. That's Great by SoSueMe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Wooo Hooo!
    Next story please.

    1. Re:That's Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next story please.

      WTF ??
      You think reading about the latest interview with Mr. Torvalds is more important than a chinese astronaut successfully landing from space ???

      Oh wait, I know! You must be from USA, the rest of the world doesn't exist, so every event related to us didn't really happen!

    2. Re:That's Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh wait, I know! You must be from USA, the rest of the world doesn't exist, so every event related to us didn't really happen!

      And SoSueMe claims another sucker head for the hall of trophies.

  8. How fast will they move ahead? by friday2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now, congratulations to the Chinese to jumping over this first hurdle of space exploration, but as the article also points out, their designs are based on 36 year old designs (with some upgrades). Now that this is done, how fast will they advance? Can they move full steam ahead, go to the Moon, to Mars, etc? Or will it take them another 15 years to do the next step?

    1. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by drudd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Taking 15 years to the next step is only reasonable, provided they make that next step. I'd much rather China not follow in the US's footsteps and make hurried overly specialized design decisions just to make it to the moon, then stop just when the bugs started to be worked out.

      Slow but sustained development would be a terrific thing, unfortunately I think China's government is really only interested in the short term propaganda value, just like the US.

      Doug

      --
      Venn ist das nurnstuck git und Slotermeyer? Ya! Beigerhund das oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
    2. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by Wooky_linuxer · · Score: 1

      Does that mean "how fast will it take them to build space-shuttles based in new technology that is great for pirotecnic effects but it's actually worse then the 36 yo. design?"

      --
      Where is that guy who'd die defending what I had to say when I need him?
    3. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by isomeme · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It should be noted that US hardware for human space travel is also based on designs which are around three decades old (with some upgrades). Ditto Russian hardware.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    4. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by datheus · · Score: 1

      Either way, I don't think it matters. I see this has hopefully a jump start to the government to start funding NASA again. If China shows to be real compitition, I don't think the government in America would let them have it (space, that is) Both fear of communism, losing economic power, and a possible arms race. I view space exploration and study a very important thing. It won't pay off in the near future, hell, even just the future. But I see it as a *long* term investment. At some point we're going to need alternatives to living on this rock. Obviously, the only way to go is up. So with any luck, this will encourage more funding to NASA. Even if it doesn't, maybe China can provide something beneficial to the world community.

    5. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by quacking+duck · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Slow but sustained development would be a terrific thing, unfortunately I think China's government is really only interested in the short term propaganda value, just like the US.

      This story suggests this isn't just a short-term propaganda project. The author's analysis of the systems involved, that they included a lot of equipment that you wouldn't bother with on a one-off design, suggest that they put a lot of thought behind the system and they're in this for the long haul.

    6. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by TheHornedOne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They have the advantage of learning from 30-odd years of American and Russian spaceflight research. They've acquired a lot from public sources, and, like any good country with a strong military-industrial complex, the rest by subterfuge. Plus we know (and I say this as a simple statement of fact), the Chinese are excellent imitators. I predict rapid progress.

    7. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by Ryu2 · · Score: 1

      Unlike some who suggest it's a space race just for propoganda value, the Chinese space program has been quite methodical and they've taken their time. They were originally going to launch in 1999 to coincide with the 50th anniversary of the PRC, but wisely decided not to.

      I would much rather see slow but steady progress for the Chinese, both in their engineering and operations, than hurried, rushed decisions that seemed to be a part of NASA culture and contributed to accidents like Challenger and Columbia and have now resulted in the US program at a standstill.

      --
      There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    8. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by jcr · · Score: 1

      The race was between the USA and the USSR, and it's over.

      The commies got a man in space first, and the USA got the man on the moon. The Chinese effort is a "me, too".

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    9. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by rillopy · · Score: 0

      And what beautiful designs they were! They've lasted this long, haven't they?

    10. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but as the article also points out, their designs are based on 36 year old designs (with some upgrades)

      So is the x86-based PC, but those fuckin' crap-ass things run the planet.

      Let the Chinks have their moment. It's the least we can do before we nuke them off the face of the earth.

    11. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by NSObject · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It should be noted that Linux software for computer operating systems is also based on designs which are around three decades old (with some upgrades).
      Ditto BSD software.

    12. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by fiftyfly · · Score: 1
      It should be noted that US hardware for human space travel is also based on designs which are around three decades old (with some upgrades). Ditto Russian hardware.
      Mmmmm, I'd rather be 30 odd years behond and moving then 30 years behind 'cause I spent a generation gazing into my navel
      --
      "Sanity is not statistical", George Orwell, "1984"
    13. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah.. interesting how technology moves backwards. Probably couldn't even make it to the moon anymore.

      Feels like the dark ages when technology really did move backwards for decades.

    14. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Absolutely.

      This isn't just the case of Chinese, either. It's all dynastic peoples. The japanese are well known for this trait - embrace and extend. They don't do conceptual leaps and bounds well, but they're obscenely good at implimenting current ideas to the letter and improving on the current implimentations.

      Or so my Japanese uncle tells me.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    15. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      China is not a country or a culture to worry only about short term propaganda value. The Chinese have such an ancient civilization that even if they were thinking in the short term, that would be about 100 years. Lest you think I'l talking out of my ass, my father served as an advisor to the Nationalist Chinese during his military career, and he's my source.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    16. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so is that why the Chinese have invented:

      -paper
      -paved roads
      -movable type printing
      -gunpowder
      -the compass
      -modern agriculture
      -paper money

      and countless others that i can't think of off the top of my head. Any of these inventions are far more significant "conceptual leaps" than the US or Russia's space program- both programs were simply improvements on Nazi rocket technology (done by capturerd Germans, i might add)

    17. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      You need to learn how to read more thoroughly.

      I wasn't targetting Chinese, I was simply talking about the socio-political mindset that I've heard exists in that region of the world, as opposed to that of over in the West. As in, encouraged freedom and thought (theoretically, at least) in the West, and constriction of the populace in the East, and the resulting effects on mindset.

      Same basic idea as outsourcing to India. They produce shoddy code, possibly due to politics. It's theorized, with some circumstantial evidence, that India had nuclear weapontry thousands of years ago. So what? Look where they are now.

      I am in no way saying that the West is superior, either. Don't get on that high horse.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    18. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, I hope the mods get their points restored soon. I *hate* looking at 2 point posts.
      I guess I need to listen to Art Bell some more. Thanks for the reminder.

    19. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by WoTG · · Score: 1

      Interesting link!

      For the benefit of those who won't read the article, the author thinks that "orbital module" of the Shenzhou spacecraft will be kept in orbit AND chained together over multiple launches! I.e., it could be a quick and dirty way to put up a long term space station. Very clever.

    20. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by flacco · · Score: 1
      unfortunately I think China's government is really only interested in the short term propaganda value, just like the US.

      military.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    21. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by errxn · · Score: 1

      Seeing as how the US, who is undeniably the world leader in space exploration, is considering reverting back to 30+ year old technology in an attempt to stop the bleeding (engineering, budgetary, public relations, political, and otherwise) from Yet Another Shuttle Disaster, consider the question to be begged: if the technology is proven reliable, does its age really matter?

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    22. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The design of American space shuttle is at least 25 years old.

    23. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      their designs are based on 36 year old designs (with some upgrades)

      Take a close look at the history of the Space Shuttle and you'll relize that this isn't a "communist problem" as some pro-americans might like to point out. China rulez. Too sad this wasn't covered as much by the press as american space voyages. But living in a country where the most TV stations are owned by american media giants I certainly know why. Now you may mod me down... ;-)

    24. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Good point. Even most concepts behind internal combustion engines were created a century ago..and we're still driving gasoline powered cars for the most part.

      Old tech isn't necessarily bad tech, and new tech isn't necessarily better than the old. Case in point: isa hardware modems vs. pci softmodems.

    25. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by sab39 · · Score: 1

      Would it still be a "me, too" if they put a man on the moon? How about if they established a permanent human presence there? How about on Mars?

      Any giant leap ahead has to begin by catching up...

    26. Re:How fast will they move ahead? by jcr · · Score: 1

      Would it still be a "me, too" if they put a man on the moon?

      Yep.

      How about if they established a permanent human presence there? How about on Mars?

      If they did either of those things, then it would be a whole new ball game. Keep in mind though, that at this stage they're just cloning Russian designs..

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  9. Congratulations to China! by mOoZik · · Score: 2, Funny

    Congrats, China! You managed to put a man into orbit (and return safely to the Earth) without the benfit of stolen German technology! Space exploration is no longer limited to Russia and the U.S. - show them what you're made of!

    Go Forth And Conquer!

    why am i so excited? :D

    1. Re:Congratulations to China! by Yakman · · Score: 2, Funny
      Congrats, China! You managed to put a man into orbit (and return safely to the Earth) without the benfit of stolen German technology!

      Yay! Instead it was done with upgraded Russian technology!

      On a related note, my favourite story about Chinese space exploration is this:

      About 650 years ago, an inventive Chinese mandarin named Wan Hu tied 47 large rockets filled with gunpowder to his chair and, firmly clutching a kite in each hand, ordered his servants to light the touchpapers.

      He vanished in a cloud of sparks and blue smoke, according to legend, with many of his Ming dynasty contemporaries believing he was somewhere in the heavens.
    2. Re:Congratulations to China! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the Russians stole from the Germans too. At the end of WWII it was a free for all to see who could grab the most German scientists and info. Remember that the V2 is really the granddaddy of both the Russians and the Americans.

      Either way I think the first post was just an anti-American troll.

    3. Re:Congratulations to China! by planarian · · Score: 1

      ...and that upgraded Russian technology came from stolen German technology.

    4. Re:Congratulations to China! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it wasn'y stolen German tech, it was bought Russian tech.

      Go forth and immitate!

      Why am I so not excited?

    5. Re:Congratulations to China! by kfg · · Score: 3, Funny

      Their next project is going to be a "space elevator," constructed by standing on each other's shoulders.

      That should get 'em to Mars before us.

      KFG

    6. Re:Congratulations to China! by de+Selby · · Score: 1

      ...and that upgraded Russian technology came from stolen German technology.

      Much of which came from American hobbyists. Of course, at each stage, things improved.

    7. Re:Congratulations to China! by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      That's rich! Are you saying Wernher von Braun or the other German rocket scientists had any ties to America and the American "advances"? There were no advances. Even in the 30's, Goddard was having many problems. Despite lack of contact, von Braun took Germany from nothing to a pioneering rocket program. Had it not been for him, the U.S. space program wouldn't be what it is today. Don't you forget that.

    8. Re:Congratulations to China! by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 2, Funny

      In German and English
      I know how to count down
      And I'm learning Chinese
      Says Werner von Braun

      -- Tom Leher

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    9. Re:Congratulations to China! by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 1

      Where, oh where are my mod points....

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    10. Re:Congratulations to China! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RE:-About 650 years ago, an inventive Chinese mandarin named Wan Hu tied 47 large rockets filled with gunpowder to his chair and, firmly clutching a kite in each hand, ordered his servants to light the touchpapers.

      he was blasted in to the heavins alright, just in millions of pieces...

    11. Re:Congratulations to China! by VanWEric · · Score: 1

      Because more competition, even friendly competition, is good for us. America feels little motivation to do truly innovative space stuff with only Russia "competing" with it. With china, hopefully we will begin a "keep ahead" race, which if done correctly (friendly) will be of great benefit to us all. Kind of like how Mozilla will make IE become a better product (ok, the anolgy is skewed and incorrect, but...) If we can afford this race financially, the investment will return back to us several fold. Woot to China!

      --
      www.olin.edu
    12. Re:Congratulations to China! by sfled · · Score: 1


      Nice rhyme!

      --
      I'm not really a web designer, I just play one on the Internet.
    13. Re:Congratulations to China! by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

      I thought von Braun admited that he got his start in rocketry by going over Goddards patent applications. I could be wrong, It's been a long time since I studied rocketry.

    14. Re:Congratulations to China! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's crazy! (I heard they would do it by stacking chairs one on top of another...)

      Personally, I'd like to see a Chinese astronaut firedrill.

    15. Re:Congratulations to China! by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

      Gone nowhere.

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    16. Re: Congratulations to China! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      About 650 years ago, an inventive Chinese mandarin named Wan Hu tied 47 large rockets filled with gunpowder to his chair and, firmly clutching a kite in each hand, ordered his servants to light the touchpapers.

      He vanished in a cloud of sparks and blue smoke, according to legend, with many of his Ming dynasty contemporaries believing he was somewhere in the heavens.
      Now that's a man who knew how to go out in style.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    17. Re:Congratulations to China! by ndogg · · Score: 1
      Somehow you made me think of this:

      Looks like you're trying to put a person into space. Would you like to:
      • Use outdated Russian technology and suck up the loss of life?
      • Use outdated American technology and suck up the loss of life?
      • Use unfinished European technology and suck up the loss of life?
      • Create your own and suck up the loss of life?
      • Throw me behind the rockets and see how well I burn?
      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    18. Re: Congratulations to China! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > Remember that the V2 is really the granddaddy of both the Russians and the Americans.

      Everyone recognizes the V2's freudian significance, but it's a surprise to know it was capable of siring children!

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    19. Re:Congratulations to China! by Mr.+Troll · · Score: 1

      You are correct sir......German spies in the US during the WWII, of which there were MANY.....poured though the Lib of Congress for LOTS of the V2 technolgy.....they improved upon it, of course....but American hobbyists were at the core of it...

      --
      Kiss my shiny metal ass
    20. Re:Congratulations to China! by Luyseyal · · Score: 3, Informative
      http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/pi/messages/2788 .html

      [about the inventor of rockets being the American, Robert Goddard]

      >> Well, I don't know much about that so I won't confirm nor deny,
      >> but it sounds fishy to me. As far as I know, America hadn't even
      >> tested a rocket motor during the time that Van Brown (spelling?)
      >> was rolling V2's out onto the pad to launch at England.

      and then Steve replied:

      >> Goddard succesfully flew the first liquid fueled rocket in 1926.

      Steve is correct. History records Goddard as inventing the rocket, and that Wernher Von Braun copied these designs, infringing upon Goddard patents. In fact, if we hadn't been at war, and if Goddard hadn't died during the war, Goddard may have prosecuted these patents. But one thing is for sure - Von Braun admits to basing his work after Goddard's.

      versus

      http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/tg/stores/deta il/reviews/-/books/1560983868/202-9638315-4933460

      Excerpted from Aiming for the Stars by Tom D. Crouch. Copyright \

      (Robert) Goddard left Roswell in 1941 to work with U.S. Navy and Curtiss-Wright engineers on the development of jet-assisted-takeoff and variable-thrust, liquid-propellant rockets. By the spring of 1944 he was receiving detailed reports on a new German long-range rocket, the V-2. "The weapon is reported to be almost identical with the rocket we were working on in New Mexico at the time we changed over to war work," he wrote to Harry Guggenheim, "except that it is larger."

      Goddard provided the editor of the National Geographic News Bulletin with a list of his own patents for almost every aspect of V-2 design. "So closely do the mechanical features of the V-2 parallel the American projectile [Goddard's rocket]," the News Bulletin announced in January 1945, "that some physicists think the Germans may have actually copied most of the design."

      That, certainly, was the opinion of Robert Hutchings Goddard. On August 14, 1945, he died of throat cancer, convinced that his work had played a key role in the Germans' success. It simply was not true. The Germans had followed the same path as Goddard, quite unaware that he had been there before them. Under the inspired leadership of Wernher von Braun, they had surged past him without a backward glance, achieving Goddard's goal of sending a rocket to the edge of space.

      versus

      http://history.msfc.nasa.gov/goddard/history.html

      versus

      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/6303 26140X?v=glance

      And so on...

      I'm just saying the history's a little muddied as to whether von Braun actually copied the patents or if their designs were similar based on reading the same literature, doing similar experiments, etc. (c.f., Newton and Leibniz).

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    21. Re:Congratulations to China! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use Canadian technology and then try to figure out how to get your really cool robot arm up there.

    22. Re:Congratulations to China! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      See, the reason why America felt motivated to keep up with/surpass the Russians during the Cold War was because we saw them as a threat. They were our enemies, and their philosophy/outlook on the world was in drastic contrast to our's. Both sides saw this, and saw the other side as a threat to their way of life and power base - politically and economically. As it turns out, both sides managed to prosper pretty well during the whole ordeal.

      Now, in this situation, America has become placated, liberal, and fairly socialistic, if not even communist in some respects and attitudes. People want something for nothing. China is fundamentally communist, and closely resembles a socialistic state in practice. We don't see them as an 'enemy' but as a 'ally'. Unfortunately, China sees the US and Europe as "the West", and we are to be conquered; we are still seen as fundamentally and philosophically conflicting to their leaders.

      I would agree with your basic premise, though. If we did it, we'd reap the benefits. However, it's not going to happen.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    23. Re:Congratulations to China! by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      As the OP gave credit, that's by Tom Lehrer, from his song, "Werner Von Braun".

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    24. Re:Congratulations to China! by nathanh · · Score: 1

      "Vonce the rocket goes up
      Who cares vere it comes down
      That's not my department",
      Says Werner von Braun.

    25. Re:Congratulations to China! by LS · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It appears that you do not know that Tsien Hsue-Shen, the founder of China's space program, was a member of NASA's JPL and a protege of Theodor von Karman, and learned from Wernher von Braun.

      LS

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    26. Re:Congratulations to China! by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of a South Park episode where the kids try to build a stairway to heaven and it became a race between them (helped with the US government) and the Japanese. They have to reach heaven because Kenny had a winning lottery ticket but had died before, but their parents misunderstood them (as usual) and thought they just missed Kenny that much. Their ladder was made of scrap wood while the Japanese one was hightech, and the Japanese won of course.. what's the point of this post, no idea. But the writers managed to tie it to GWB and the non-existant WMD, which made it hilarious. Read the script, or download it (from there or somewhere else) :)

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    27. Re: Congratulations to China! by Moofie · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think that in order for something to be a penis-symbol, there should be an alternative way to design it so that it's NOT a penis symbol.

      There's no light without dark, right? Therefore, penis symbology only makes sense if, among several otherwise-equivalent designs, you choose the one that looks like a dick.

      Please design a viable rocket-powered vessel that looks like a vagina.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    28. Re:Congratulations to China! by hanssprudel · · Score: 1

      Had it not been for him, the U.S. space program wouldn't be what it is today.

      You mean an administrative quagmire that hasn't done anything but scramble to justify it's funding for the last thirty-four years?

    29. Re:Congratulations to China! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Space exploration is no longer limited to Russia and the U.S. ... .., France, India and some other countries. I know what you meant, just nitpicking.

    30. Re:Congratulations to China! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was that expression ? -

      You develop someone's idea and you are infringing, you develop scientific idea and you are collaborating

    31. Re: Congratulations to China! by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Please design a viable rocket-powered vessel that looks like a vagina.

      No can do. It always ends up looking like a hot air balloon...

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  10. I will be more impressed... by BJZQ8 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I will be much more impressed when they put some sort of semi-permanent station in space, like the US and Russians did lots in the 60's and 70's. The US have greatly helped their "satellite" launch (AKA ballistic missile launch) industry and it's a fallacy, in my view, to talk about this as a "Chinese only venture." It's best chalked up to Red propaganda and left at that.

    1. Re:I will be more impressed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will be much more impressed when they put some sort of semi-permanent station in space, like the US and Russians did lots in the 60's and 70's.

      Aside from Skylab, it was mostly the Russians. :)

      But if I recall correctly, the orbiting module on the ShenZhou craft can stay in orbit indefinitely, and since it has docking capabilities, the Chinese could theoretically link several of them together (once they've done a few more flights) and have a space-station as a by-product of their first few manned flights. From what I've read on Chinese web sites, they're keen to begin their own zero-gravity physics research.

      Paul

    2. Re:I will be more impressed... by BJH · · Score: 1

      It's best chalked up to Red propaganda and left at that.

      Hey, the '50s called; they want their prejudices back.

    3. Re:I will be more impressed... by AtomicBomb · · Score: 1

      I don't know where did you get the information from. The Chinese missile program has a much stronger influence from the Russian, esp in the 50's, than from the American. The bulk of the satellite launching infrastructure had been done largely on their own when they were embargoed by both, ie between 1960-80.

      China launched its first satellite on Apr 1970.
      First geostationary communications satellite on Apr 1984 (and first ICBM DF-5 finished testing in 1980. A bit offtrack, but we all know ICBM's design is not that different from satellite launching). All these are prior to the alleged illegal missile technology from Hughes etc in early 90's... In fact, even before the first commercial Chinese satellite launching in 1995.

      http://www.spacedaily.com/news/china-00u.html
      h ttp://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/china/icbm/df-5.htm

    4. Re:I will be more impressed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't about impressing the US, its about impressing China's neighbors is Asia, like India and Japan.

      Indian analysis are already on the news saying We can lunch a man into space if we wanted too...

    5. Re:I will be more impressed... by Dylan2000 · · Score: 1

      Indian analysis are already on the news saying We can lunch a man into space if we wanted too...

      Mmmmm... Indian food, Chinese food, those guys can lunch *me* in space anytime!

      --
      Build your own website - full service homepage system your m
    6. Re:I will be more impressed... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      The US have greatly helped their "satellite" launch (AKA ballistic missile launch) industry and it's a fallacy, in my view, to talk about this as a "Chinese only venture."


      And US space-program was built by Germans, so what's your point?
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    7. Re:I will be more impressed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JESUS FUCKING FUCK!...you goddamned moderators won't allow ANYONE to have a FUCKING conversation without modding it FLAMEBAIT. Pull your heads out of your goatse-sized ASSHOLES and remember that SOME people want to have a meaningful discussion without you people FUCKING it up!

    8. Re:I will be more impressed... by idamaybrown · · Score: 1

      Tell it to Tibet.

  11. Gratz! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On behalf of of the human race, Congradulations!

    1. Re:Gratz! by register_ax · · Score: 1
      On behalf of of the human race, Congradulations!

      Clever, not many would so abhorrently create a mistake like that to cast their discerning eye over the bulk of our species...or...wait! was that just a mistake??! Kinda makes you rethink whether we're so sapient, doughnit?...

  12. Congrats to China by TibbonZero · · Score: 1

    While I normally don't support China in just about any way (due to their human rights stances), I must say Congrats on getting people in space. It's a huge undertaking obviously, and i'm glad to see that everything went well.
    Perhaps soon we will have more countries docking at the International Space station instead of just Russia and the US.

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:Congrats to China by register_ax · · Score: 1

      I agree. In particular, I was most interested in seeing Brazil reign champion of the skys. Their launch pad was the closest one built yet near the equator. Although the relatively recent fatal blast is devastating, and a sure blow to the moral. Especially since the cause is still under investigation. My hope is waning as well, it's just that Brazil has a lot of natural resources and a great potential in flexing it's might in the world market, with their MERCOSUR free trade agreement and all. It handles a hefty punch in South America, contributing to the rest of the world as they wake themselves up to irradicating their foolish trade restrictions...fools. Especially when the Andean pact has been so unsuccessful. Yeah MERCOSUR hasn't been performing in the last couple years as well since it's growth period from 1988, but I find it hard to believe it's not related to a shifting of resources. It's normal.

    2. Re:Congrats to China by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      While I normally don't support ancient Egytians in just about any way (due to their human rights stances),congrats on the pyrmids!

      sheesh.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Congrats to China by TibbonZero · · Score: 1

      Pretty much.... :)

      --
      Tibbon
      tibbon.com
    4. Re:Congrats to China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you don't support China? I'll give you marks for at least conceding a congradulation.

      US Embassador : We think you should stop treating your people the way you do. Communism is not freedom. Democracy is the only way.

      Chinese Foreign Minister : How is that Patriot act turning out by the way. Incidently, how old is your country?

      US Embassador : 300 years or so.

      Chinese Foreign Minister : Our culture is 3000 years old, who are you to tell us what to do?

      US Embassador : We're the USA, the land of the free and the home of the brave!

      Chinese Foreign Minister : We invented gunpowder before you were even a country. We won't be pushed around by an infantile nation with a Ceasar complex.

      US Embassador : Watch it, we're bigger than you.

      Chinese Foreign Minister : How do you figure?

      US Embassador : What do you mean? We're the USA, we are the greatest military power in the history of history. We're the good guys. We landed on the moon years ago (with a little help from the Nazis), so our ICBMs are way cooler. Our computer technology is the best in the world. We have the largest and most influential software companies on the planet. Besides, we're on CNN more often.

      Chinese Foreign Minister : Uh huh, I see. Well, we've had a one child policy for three decades now to curb growth of the largest population on the planet. Additionally, Chinese couples prefer their one child to be boys, and so many girls have died or are orphaned, as such there are many men aged between 18 and 30 for each woman in China. And did I mention national service is compulsory. How did that war in Kosovo pan out for you? I hear things would have run smoother if you sent in ground troops.

      US Embassador : If you keep with this line of reasoning, we'll have to take defensive action and unleash an attack of unprecendented proportions against you. We must protect ourselves against such blatent agression.

      Chinese Foreign Minister : That would cause untold destruction across the whole of Asia. It would cause our economy to collapse and put hundreds of thousands of people out of work. Tell me, where do you make your computers, cars and consumer electronics?

      US Embassador : Oh, in China... it's much cheaper to ... oh. As you were.

    5. Re:Congrats to China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the closest launch pad to the equator, not Brazil's:

      http://www.sea-launch.com/

      Brasil's pad could undoubtably be made to support heavier launch vehicles/payloads than Sea Launch, though.

  13. Response to Microsoft? by Anusien · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is there anyone else that thinks this is China saying, "Screw you America, we don't need you and your restrictive anti-trust business practices?" I mean, all the recent events:
    China Open-Sources
    The Great Firewall of China
    China's Moon Launch

    Is it just me or is this China trying to assert its technological domninance, so to speak?

    1. Re:Response to Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that it's just you

    2. Re:Response to Microsoft? by petabyte · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For god's sake:

      NOT EVERYTHING HAS TO DO WITH MICROSOFT.

      They put a man into orbit which is pretty impressive. I don't see an Apple "Spaceport" or Intel Pentium 4000Kilopascal rocket blasting off.

      Now while I agree that they probably want to assert their own technical dominance and avoid US interests (thats good economics). But China talking about "restrictive anti-trust business practices" ... I suddenly have pictures of Bill Gates standing in front of a tank at Tianamein. China doesn't care about Microsoft; it cares about its own self-interests. Exploring science leads to discoveries that help its people and *make money*. Its sad in these post 9-11 days the US has such a hard time with that.

    3. Re:Response to Microsoft? by kfg · · Score: 1

      No, this is pretty much China just minding its own business. For some reason they seem to think they have status as a sovreign nation; and one just as capable as any other. They have a long, long history of such.

      The sleeping dragon stirs.

      Invest in Nomex underwear. You might need it.

      KFG

    4. Re:Response to Microsoft? by whorfin · · Score: 1

      You're new to slashdot, aren't you?

      --
      Laugh while you can, monkey-boy!
    5. Re:Response to Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Its sad in these post 9-11 days the US has such a hard time with that.
      Not everything has to do with 9-11 either.
    6. Re:Response to Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im glad they are, America is full of it

    7. Re:Response to Microsoft? by Anusien · · Score: 1

      Not that you're wrong (new to posting, not to reading), but what does THAT have to do with anything?

    8. Re:Response to Microsoft? by whorfin · · Score: 1

      My post was a response to the person who replied to you with the "Not everything has to do with Microsoft", not your post. [grin]

      It was a bit of a minor joke, since on Slashdot, all that is wrong with the world can be traced back to Microsoft, SCO, the RIAA, the US Government, or a combination of the above, but mostly Microsoft.

      --
      Laugh while you can, monkey-boy!
    9. Re:Response to Microsoft? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      If you're right, it's not surprising. If I was in our government, I'd also like to adopt open source software, stay away from the US abomination named Microsoft, and go to the moon. :-)

      I wouldn't like a great firewall though. They're useful for security, not isolation.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    10. Re:Response to Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

    11. Re:Response to Microsoft? by Craig3010 · · Score: 1

      God, if only Bill Gates WOULD stand in front of a tank in Tianamein....RAM HIM!!! Mow the little fuck down!!!! Yeeee Hawwwwwww!!!!!!!!!

  14. Gooks in Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1 gook on the moon - problem
    1000 gooks on the moon - big problem
    all gooks on the moon - problem solved

    1. Re:Gooks in Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a "chink," you insensitive clod.

  15. Not only did another guy post it before you... by dreadnougat · · Score: 1

    but he also has the id right before yours :) (#7225673), (#7225674) Something fishy... :)

    1. Re:Not only did another guy post it before you... by Drakin · · Score: 0, Redundant

      uuuh. Actually that's the message ID, not the User ID.

  16. Great by LegendNH · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Great! They got one of them up there...

    now if they can only figure out how to get the rest of them up there, we would be set!

  17. Proof? by Quaoar · · Score: 1

    I'm just curious if there are any third-parties (U.S, Europe) out there keeping track of China's manned space mission to see if they actually succeeded. Not that a major world power would EVER lie!

    --
    I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
    1. Re:Proof? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      im sure a very great divison of the cia and nasa were both listening very closely. its not like the american moon mission.

    2. Re:Proof? by Caribo · · Score: 1

      Were there any so-called third-parties when Americans landed the moon?

    3. Re:Proof? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, your mom.

    4. Re:Proof? by mek2600 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure that EVERY country that has the resources is going to closely watch what China does in space.

    5. Re:Proof? by ColaMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can bet that any time anyone launches something orbital (or more importantly, suborbital) that NORAD (an thier Russian etc counterparts) will be looking long and hard at it.

      I'd be guessing that somewhere in their three ring binder for space launches there's a little note that says "ring this number and inform NORAD et al of time of launch". It'd be the polite thing to do, anyway.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    6. Re:Proof? by mubar · · Score: 1

      Well, you could follow the mission even by yourself with the aid of resources like Heavens Above databases (obviously that orbit display isn't accurate anymore since they've landed already...)

  18. a tear to my eye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    way to go china. im not chinese and have no connection to anything but i mean whats better than getting people up there. the x prize is comming soon acording to a slashdot article last week. i might actually make it to space in my lifetime. hell in 50 years i could be piloting a deep space mission.
    please keep it up. life on earth sucks bawls.

  19. Thats the problem ... by torpor · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ... with jokes about Chinese space missions ... as soon as you read one, you see another.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  20. D'oh! I feel stupid by dreadnougat · · Score: 1

    That's the post number :( I can't even claim to be drunk :(

  21. Lesser of Two evils... by OtakuHawk · · Score: 2, Funny

    I for one would rather have china than Bill. The former's food is better, for starters.

    1. Re:Lesser of Two evils... by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Who's Bill?

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  22. The spacecraft should have been shot down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    by the US military just for shits and giggles.

    1. Re:The spacecraft should have been shot down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funniest troll in this thread

    2. Re:The spacecraft should have been shot down by MoronGames · · Score: 1

      Lots of giggles!

      --
      hey!
  23. Meanwhile... by tkrotchko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We're spending all out money destroying Iraq and then rebuilding it.

    Not meaning to sound bitter, and I think its fantastic that the Chinese did this. I hope China goes to the moon or beyond.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      87 billion dollars is in the noise compared to everything the US government spends.

    2. Re:Meanwhile... by CGP314 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hope China goes to the moon or beyond.

      But not Europa. Attempt no landings there.

    3. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how does it compare to the budget of NASA for the same period?

    4. Re:Meanwhile... by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      For a second I thought you said Europe. I imagine the Germans would get pretty annoyed if the Chinese sent a manned mission to Stuttgart.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    5. Re:Meanwhile... by David+Gould · · Score: 1


      But not Europa. Attempt no landings there.

      All these base are belong to you. Except Europa -- take off no ZIGs there.

      --
      David Gould
      main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
  24. Historic step up the mountain by sssmashy · · Score: 1

    President Hu Jintao watched the blast-off at the Jiuquan Launch Center and hailed the launch as "the glory of our great motherland."

    Hu said the culmination of the 11-year space program was a "historic step of the Chinese people in the advance of climbing over the peak of the world's science and technology."

    Is it just me, or is there something ominous in the way this is worded? The Chinese government believes that the motherland will inevitably surpass other nations in science and technology, and this is a major advance towards the goal of global supremacy.

    1. Re:Historic step up the mountain by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      No, it's not about supremacy, but rather, about national pride of the collective. It is the beauty of communism.

    2. Re:Historic step up the mountain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad China is about as Communist as my ass. True Marxist Communism has never existed and will never exist. China is an over-populated, mostly poor country that is run by leaders who are more than happy to adopt western culture as long as they can control and profit from it. There is no beauty in the Chinese so called Communism. Go back and read your Marx again.

    3. Re:Historic step up the mountain by quacking+duck · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Firefly, here we come!

      To those not in the know, Firefly's set in a future where China became one of the dominant superpowers, influential enough that all the English-speaking characters can easily communicate... well, curse anyway... in Chinese (and Serenity's system alarms are bilingual, English and Cantonese). Could be that Joss Whedon's idea for a background might not be so farfetched!

    4. Re:Historic step up the mountain by Procyon101 · · Score: 1

      Well I, for one, welcome our Chinese overlords

    5. Re:Historic step up the mountain by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      You anonymous coward. Pure communism would be close to utopia, and I never said it was wholly Marxist. However, China is a strong communist force, and despite popular western belief, is doing pretty well. See the computer you're staring at? Guess what, most of it came from China. Their communist ways, despite your beliefs, will make them a superpower within the next century.

    6. Re:Historic step up the mountain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you need to brush up on the concept of "fiction."

    7. Re:Historic step up the mountain by Zan+Zu+from+Eridu · · Score: 1
      China is sending a signal:
      Yang unveiled a Chinese and United Nations flag while in orbit in what the Chinese media said was intended to highlight pursuit of a peaceful exploration of space.
      The russians started their boran project to copy the space shuttle because they thought it could/would be used as a strategic nuclear arms platform (almost zero detection time because there would be no missile launches), and the chinese aren't happy either with permanent space stations orbiting earth if they can't reach (and later produce) them independent of foreign powers.

      Sure there is a lot of propaganda and China has it's science projects too, but there is also the very real signal that China is now almost capable of placing very nasty stuff in space if it wants to.

    8. Re:Historic step up the mountain by Strudelkugel · · Score: 1

      You might want to brush up on your 'isms. Study fascism very carefully. I'm not a fan of Michael Ledeen, but here's an editorial he wrote that makes some interesting observations.

      --
      Imagine how much harder physics would be if electrons had feelings! -Feynman, maybe
    9. Re:Historic step up the mountain by DaleBob · · Score: 1

      Considering that the wording of the quote is a clumsy English translation of something originally said in Chinese, I wouldn't worry too much about it.

      Problems with translation are a source of much of the confusion the U.S. currently faces with North Korea... I mean, think of the poor translator trying to convert some of the Bushisms into understandable Korean.

    10. Re:Historic step up the mountain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Some random quotes from Bush:


      Vice President Cheney and I are focused on the nation's top priorities - strengthening the economy, protecting the homeland, and winning the war on terror. We will continue to earn the confidence of the American people by working to keep this nation prosperous, strong and secure.
      (...)

      This administration is leading the world to make the world more secure. We have a solemn duty, not only to our homeland, but to help others who embrace freedom. History has called us into action, and we will not let history down. We must remember that one of the lessons of September the 11th is these killers will try to find safe harbor. And that's why I laid out a new doctrine for American foreign policy. It said, if you harbor a terrorist, if you feed a terrorist, if you hide a terrorist, you're just as guilty as the terrorists.

      It's important, as you begin to make the case for this administration that not only do we lay out doctrine, but more importantly, we enforce doctrine.


      Is it just me, or is there something ominous in the way this is worded? The American government believes that the motherland will inevitably surpass other nations in science and technology, and this is a major advance towards the goal of global supremacy.
    11. Re:Historic step up the mountain by _Qiang_ · · Score: 1

      i think that's patriotism. US does that more often now especially after 9.11

    12. Re:Historic step up the mountain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Is it just me, or is there something ominous in the way this is worded? The Chinese government believes that the motherland will inevitably surpass other nations in science and technology, and this is a major advance towards the goal of global supremacy.


      This is no different from American supremacist views. Everyone always has to think they're just so fucking special and that therefore they should be in charge.


      That being said, congrats to the Chinese. I've always said I'd like to sleep by the light of a Communist moon. That way maybe I'll get to see us get to Mars in my lifetime.

    13. Re:Historic step up the mountain by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      See the computer you're staring at? Guess what, most of it came from China. Their communist ways, despite your beliefs, will make them a superpower within the next century.

      The Chinese government seems to be a strange mix comprised mostly of a mix of communism and fascism. The computer production is mostly a result of the newer fascist side. The communist side deals mainly with subsistence farming.

      Over time, the trend looks like they will entirely drop the communism and the fascism may mellow out. In the meantime, the US is becoming more authoritarian. I think it's possible that one day both countries (and others too) will converge towards a system that looks something like the current Singapore government.

    14. Re:Historic step up the mountain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have over a billion people, make virtualy all high tech products bought in the US and Europe, are not spending a fortune on starting wars in other countries. It is likely that they will make fast progress now, especially as they can analyze what the US and USSR have done before and not make the same mistakes.

    15. Re:Historic step up the mountain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Damn, ya beat me to it. ;) And 50 other people, no doubt.

    16. Re:Historic step up the mountain by Psx29 · · Score: 1
      in Chinese (and Serenity's system alarms are bilingual, English and Cantonese).

      Don't you mean mandarin? Cantonese is the dialect spoken in Honk Kong and Guangdong(formerly canton province, thus the name of the dialect) by 110~million or so people. Mandarin is the one spoken by 1billion~ people. Of course it is a show so they could put it in whatever language they want

    17. Re:Historic step up the mountain by TheLoneDanger · · Score: 1

      I believe that Space: Above and Beyond also had China as a major power, with the broadcast that aliens were attacking having Chinese subtitles.

      --

      "But I trust in the people's capacity for reflection, rage and rebellion." -Oscar Olivera
    18. Re:Historic step up the mountain by tftp · · Score: 1
      The russians started their Buran project to copy the space shuttle because they thought it could/would be used as a strategic nuclear arms platform (almost zero detection time because there would be no missile launches)

      Buran, as well as Shuttle, would be mostly useless as a weapon. It is too visible, carries very little weight compared to regular rockets, and has to be launched ahead of time in case of war. That alone makes it a very poor weapon platform.

      Also, would anyone explain to me how could one drop a bomb from the spacecraft sitting on LEO? And preferrably so that the bomb falls to the surface in a reasonable time, hits the "landing site" with 100 meters precision, and does not burn up while blazing through the atmosphere :-)

    19. Re:Historic step up the mountain by quacking+duck · · Score: 1
      Don't you mean mandarin? Cantonese is the dialect spoken in Honk Kong and Guangdong(formerly canton province, thus the name of the dialect) by 110~million or so people. Mandarin is the one spoken by 1billion~ people. Of course it is a show so they could put it in whatever language they want

      Actually no; when the characters speak it's Mandarin (or as close as the actors can get it), but in the episode where Serenity's computers were delivering an automatic audio warning to check life support systems, it was in English and (very definitely) Cantonese.

      I can speak Cantonese and a bit of Mandarin, so the difference was very obvious to me.

      One way to look at it is that during the exodus from Earth, so many Chinese got out that they became the ruling class for a time (two of the main characters are Caucasian, but have the surname Tam). Mandarin became the official language, with English and Cantonese making up the "lower" classes. Firefly ships were definitely not classy ships.

      Or the production staff simply messed up by hiring a Cantonese person for the computer voice ;-)

    20. Re:Historic step up the mountain by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Could we, like, stop treating the neocons as Gods for a while? Thanks...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    21. Re:Historic step up the mountain by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      You can't mix "communism" and fascism. They are contradictory. Any change would require the elimination of the leaders. I suppose it can be done, but it hasn't been accomplished in modern history. Also, fascism places some element above others (eg. "race", ethnicity, religion, etc). What can China use to justify fascism? Without using such a concept, fascism won't materialize.

      As far as countries becoming like Singapore, what do you expect from capitalism? CATO institute, the bastion of capitalism, even considers Singapore to be one of the best countries (for economic freedom).

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    22. Re:Historic step up the mountain by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      How about Outlaw Star, where the money's in Yuan and the whole grappler battle theme came from China's involvement in early space colonization? And that show came about 5 years before Firefly was written (for that matter, lots of ideas in Firefly were ripped off FROM Outlaw Star).

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    23. Re:Historic step up the mountain by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I personally don't think militarization of space will result in people putting "bombs" up in space (why would they? ICBMs are already very accurate and do the same thing, albeit a little slower). Instead, I expect it to involve technologies to shoot down enemy stuff. For example, you can deploy "offensive" vehicles to shoot down enemy satellites (which will cripple the whole country). You may also put some beam weapon (only candidate so far is laser) that can shoot down enemy planes (flying below orbit).

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    24. Re:Historic step up the mountain by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      Drop a bomb to the surface?

      Why would you bother to do that? You go into LEO and fuck with all the satellites of your enemy.

      Whoops. What happened to the battlefield GPS???

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    25. Re:Historic step up the mountain by tftp · · Score: 1
      Even in this scenario manned spacecraft is not very practical. The problem is that it can "shoot down" only LEO satellites; but most of real satellites are on elliptical orbits, or are geostationary. Quite a few satellites are on polar orbits, also out of reach of any manned spacecraft.

      If you recall, Shuttle was used a few times to launch military satellites, and once the payload was released the engine on the satellite was activated and the whole thing moved onto much higher orbit.

      Anti-satellite weapons, if they are to be developed, would be just one-shot, multi-stage rockets. You can launch them to any orbit and reach any satellite; man can not be easily launched anywhere but onto the LEO. This simple solution also allows you to shoot at multiple satellites at the same time (and not one after another - which in a war would be kind of counterintuitive). And you don't have to rely upon your only asset (the shuttle) to do the job.

      All this said, I believe that direct military value of a shuttle is overrated. Sure, the space program contributes to rocket science, and through it to the army. But there is no direct benefit.

    26. Re:Historic step up the mountain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude man... this is nationalism. All nations do this. Surely you were joking.

    27. Re:Historic step up the mountain by Zan+Zu+from+Eridu · · Score: 1
      Buran, as well as Shuttle, would be mostly useless as a weapon. It is too visible, carries very little weight compared to regular rockets, and has to be launched ahead of time in case of war. That alone makes it a very poor weapon platform.

      You don't understand. Yes it must be launched ahead of time, but that is part of the the strategic threat; in a cold-war situation, one would have to monitor the shuttles constantly.

      Russian space web:

      During 1970s and 1980s, the USSR developed a winged spacecraft known as Buran (Snowstorm) designed to serve as a "parallel" response to the perceived military threat from the US Space Shuttle.
      It was a cold war, and every threat, how ever inconceivable, had to be answered.
    28. Re:Historic step up the mountain by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      Easily communicate in chinese? Not even the chinese can easily communicate with each other! They have dozens of different dialects. Even their central leaders aren't immune. Mao spoke in a dialect so obscure that even his close aids supposedly had diffculty understanding what he was saying. English is accepted as a global language not just becuase it is widely known but becuase there is really only one dialect of it. It is the same language in india, england, australia, and america. A minor difference in slang and thats it. Now take chinese, a language that has 32 POPULAR dialects. How many other countries outside fo china use chinese as thier main langauge? I can't name a single one. Chine might some day become a dominant super power (though there is a problem with that - its military and geography is really the only thing holding it together, the people of manchuria are nothing like the people of the gobi or lower china, one speaks manchurian chinese, the other cantonese, the devleopement of china might lead to being a superpower but there is an even graeter chance it ill lead to balkanization - think Roman Empire, Europe was once united but as it developed it became increaingly balkanized, think the arab world, it was once a central power but it too balkanized.)

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
    29. Re:Historic step up the mountain by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      You want an example of how bad chinese is: the cultural revolution may have been started by mistake due to an error in translating something mao said.

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
    30. Re:Historic step up the mountain by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      Thier language, the main thing that holds them together is also the main thing holding them back.

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
    31. Re:Historic step up the mountain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This link describes some current research addressing the very questions you ask.

    32. Re:Historic step up the mountain by Procyon101 · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our new American overlords.

    33. Re:Historic step up the mountain by Bugmaster · · Score: 1
      Hell yeah, it's about supremacy. China, just as the Soviet Union, is not a Communist government; it is a fascist dictatorship which uses Communism as the official party line to distract the people. As a fascist government, China needs to keep asserting its supremacy, because it needs to keep the people in line. Thus, the fact that America (an imperialist, capitalist, evil empire) has a space program, and China (the glorious motherland of freedom and utopia for all) does not... that's not merely an insult, that is an active threat to their regime.

      Supremacy ? You bet.

      --
      >|<*:=
  25. Re:First to say it by Procyon101 · · Score: 1

    Dude, you sellin? Cuz I'm out.

  26. Space.com Article by pHatidic · · Score: 3, Funny

    According to the article on space.com, the mission cost 1 billion. To quote, "Yang hurtled around the planet for the rest of Wednesday, making a planned orbit shift in midafternoon and stopping work only to rest and eat Chinese food designed especially for space travel." I for one think 1 billion dollars is well worth it for space chinese food. Along with space icecream, we can now have a complete and balanced space diet. I look forward to the day when the guy on the phone of the local chinese restraunt asks if i want my dumplings to be steamed, panfried, or 'space'.

    1. Re:Space.com Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder what his space-fortune cookie said?

    2. Re:Space.com Article by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      Loosely translated: 'You will go far in your career.'

  27. brazil by tonythejuice · · Score: 1

    Let's not forget the recent brazilian tragedy. They were on target to be #3, right? Hopefully they can regroup to be #4. It is interesting that the creators of the USS Enterprise did not anticipate that other countries might create crafts in a non-cooperative manner --- Or did they just assume that the world would become the united states? Voluntarily or by force, i wonder.

    1. Re:brazil by cranos · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just to be a technical terry here but the creation of the warp drive was achieved AFTER the US and nearly every major nation on earth had been ripped apart by the third world war. As such the US no longer existed.

    2. Re:brazil by GFPerez · · Score: 1

      I'm from Brazil and to be true, we dont have a chance in space race. The Alcantara's accident (this is how the base is named) is one of the best places on Earth to launch a spacecraft, but we were trying to launch our own satellites rather than paying other countries to do so, which would cost a much less more.

    3. Re:brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The U.S. is presumed to have been severely damaged in the next world war. The global power rising after the U.S. would be the European Hegemony.

      J

    4. Re:brazil by cmowire · · Score: 1

      Brazil's craft was their first launch vehicle.

      Quite a few countries have orbited their own satelites. So they won't be #4, they will probably be down in the teens,

    5. Re:brazil by leoboiko · · Score: 1
      ...but we were trying to launch our own satellites rather than paying other countries to do so


      And you believe that would advance our science exactly how? What do you think that are the goals of a space program?

      This self-depreciative apathy is probably the biggest obstacle on the improvement of Brazilian education. Our loss with the Alcantara base wasn't monetary, it was human. That team of high skilled scientists will be really missed. You do not honour their effort with that attitude.
      --
      Prescriptive grammar:linguistics :: alchemy:chemistry. Stop being a nazi and learn some science.
    6. Re: brazil by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > It is interesting that the creators of the USS Enterprise did not anticipate that other countries might create crafts in a non-cooperative manner

      Yeah, and they also thought the galaxy would be full of people with outrageously bad personalities and rubber lumps on their heads.

      Not a reliable source of information, AFAICT.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    7. Re:brazil by zanderredux · · Score: 1
      So, you from Brazil and Alcantara, sitting at Equator line, is probably the single best place to send anything out to space.

      So what?

      It's not about cost, but about technology development and, most importantly, the construction of a knowledge base within the country and the potential by-products that such development can bring to the benefit of the Brazilian people. It's still a very honourable and bold task!

      However, I still do not understand why they loaded the launcher vehicle with such a valuable payload, knowing that the launcher was still alpha. Microsoft's product deployment strategy, maybe?

  28. Re:wow by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    WOW how many people has the U.S. sent in to space? stupid chineese

    Yeah but they did it with a couple of old playstations, a mod chip and a 1972 toyota pickup.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  29. Only a one man operation? by XplosiveX · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I thought that usually more than one person goes into space at one time for safety measures. If he gets hurt or something and there is no other people to help him while in space he could become injured or dead and take very valuable and expensive equipment with him.

    1. Re:Only a one man operation? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Google on "Mercury Project+space flight" and "Alan Shepard".

      Wouldn't hurt to throw in "Yuri Gagarin" either.

      These short and simple early launches aren't grand experimental missions. You go up. You come down. Kind of a Sunday drive without oxygen, but less chance of being blown up then you'd have in a Pinto.

      The astronauts don't really have anything to do other than be there. Hence the derogatory term pilots applied to them; "Spam in a can."

      KFG

    2. Re: Only a one man operation? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > I thought that usually more than one person goes into space at one time for safety measures. If he gets hurt or something and there is no other people to help him while in space he could become injured or dead and take very valuable and expensive equipment with him.

      The first {astr,cosm}onauts were just mascots strapped into a diving bell strapped onto an ICBM where the warhead should be. Their yarbles were a more important qualification than their test-pilot skills.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re: Only a one man operation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their yarbles were a more important qualification than their test-pilot skills.

      Judging by the quality of a lot of goods "Made In China", this man has the biggest balls on earth.

  30. Not to be a smart ass... by Dave21212 · · Score: 1


    ... but "Welcome to the 60's !!!"

    On a serious note... China, if you're reading this, Congrats !!!

    Oh, and thanks for all the spam ;)

    --
    "Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech."--Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:Not to be a smart ass... by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      You might be closer to the truth than you think. A Communist nation is on America's Most Feared Nation list; Congress is on a checks and balances vacation to secure their constituants from terrorists. Bush has sort of decided that the missle defense treaty should be ignored.

      There are some interesting differences: instead of a Cuban Missle Crisis, we have a North Korean Missle Ignorance. But we do have a significant interest in Taiwan. Rather than a Vietnam war, we have an Iraqi Occupation. And of course, we have a hell of an apparent edge in space arms.

      Truthfully, I'd like to hope that the American leaders (and populace) alongside Chinese leaders (and populace) recognize the benefits of peace. I do worry that some day China will be taken off of the Normal Trade Relations List (aka Most Favored Nation), something that would not only reverse Kant's democratic progress theory, but probably result in triggering a slow downward spiral of relations. On a similar note, there are likely to still be elements within the army who do not wish to see the kind of leadership with a term length vision, to put it in the kindest way I know.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    2. Re:Not to be a smart ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to be a smart-ass either, but I think you're having your nose up pretty high here...

      Yes, there has been manned space-flight since the 60s, but it's still not a small accomplishment. Only the US and the USSR/Russia did it (and Europe could have, but wasn't interested or didn't want to pay for it).

      Yes, there's freedom of speach in the US, and that's great. But whenever I turn on FOX News, I catch myself wishing that some of that propaganda wouldn't be broadcast either.

      And the good ol' constitution. Best spec ever written, huh? Right on, brother! Didn't pervent slavery or genocide. Nor the fucked up last presidential elections. But darn, what a great constitution.

      Cheers.

    3. Re:Not to be a smart ass... by 11223 · · Score: 1

      So, can I say that to NASA when they start flying again?

    4. Re:Not to be a smart ass... by Dave21212 · · Score: 1


      Good point, I think you would find that many people have those same worries about China.

      In my study of China, mostly philosophy at the college level, I have learned one important thing about China that gives hope for a peaceful future. The Chinese goverment and the Chinese people are in a sense, divided. Not in any serious radical 'down with the goverment' sort of way that you'de find in Montana or such, but in the sense that the Chinese people view the govt. more as 'the current regime' than any long standing (in Chinese terms) institution. Granted, there are a crapload of party members to be worried about...

      The people have a decidedly long-term outlook on life and have learned through history that regimes come and regimes go, but the Chinese people remain. Their culture survives despite any political shift, and what a wonderful culture it is !

      One can hope for (and work towards) the best. I would recommend reading Needham's Civilization in China (GREAT ancient tech stuff), Joseph Campbell, and maybe Alan Watts sometime.

      --
      "Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech."--Benjamin Franklin
  31. Go Team! by LegendNH · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    to gookfinity and beyond

    1. Re:Go Team! by cranos · · Score: 1

      Well that was amazing, you managed to turn an inoffesive cliche into racist crap. My hat off to you. Idiot.

    2. Re:Go Team! by LegendNH · · Score: 1

      Arr your base are berong to us!

    3. Re:Go Team! by BJH · · Score: 1

      It's funny how many retarded non-jokes certain people make about how (in this case) Chinese speakers can't pronounce the letter 'l', seeing as how that's actually a problem for the Japanese, rather than the Chinese, and also seeing as how there's a whole shitload of sounds in Chinese that are difficult for English speakers to pronounce correctly.

    4. Re:Go Team! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you idiot its not gook, its chink.

    5. Re:Go Team! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's pretty hard to make sounds (with your mouth) like silverware and pots/pans banging down the stairs while fucking a chicken up the ass...

  32. Re:First to say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep your dirty yellow greasy slope hands off my stash, bitch.

  33. Are we sure it's the same guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The capsule has been recovered and opened and the pilot is very much alive, 'and doing autographs.'

    But how can we be sure it's the same guy they sent up? They all look alike...

  34. Not a Hoax, but... by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did we get to see this guy before the launch? I am not advocating a conspiracy or anything, but I would bet that China had a backup prepared to make the media appearances if anything had gone wrong. They were certainly quite worried about having the launch televised.

    1. Re:Not a Hoax, but... by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      There are still lots of people that say that the u.s trip to the moon was a hoax.

      So, your point is?

    2. Re:Not a Hoax, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is a country built on lying to its people. The U.S. only does it sometimes.

    3. Re:Not a Hoax, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, could you actually tell two chinese men apart even if you did see him?

    4. Re:Not a Hoax, but... by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      Apparently, they had a live televised rocket launch a few years back which went horribly awry. The rocket veered off course and several people on the ground were killed. They didn't want to run the risk of having this happen again, so broadcast plans were scrapped...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    5. Re:Not a Hoax, but... by silex_reloaded · · Score: 0

      selfcomfort?

    6. Re:Not a Hoax, but... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      Did you see the pictures of him waving after he got out of the capsule? Did you notice anything funny about them? There were no stars visible in the sky! That's a dead giveaway right there.

    7. Re:Not a Hoax, but... by 11223 · · Score: 1

      I think your sense of humor is underappreciated.

    8. Re:Not a Hoax, but... by DanThe1Man · · Score: 1

      yea, with their beaty little eyes and flappy little heads

    9. Re:Not a Hoax, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They actually have shown an interview of him couple months ago, talking about the space program, the training process, etc. At that time, he was not chosen yet. They only selected 3 finalists out of 14 in the last couple weeks, and then narrowed down to him in couple days before the launch.

    10. Re:Not a Hoax, but... by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      Name me one country that doesn't lie to its people, because of not saying the truth about something that may concern the security of the people, or to avoid looking stupid

  35. inidans by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    are saying it is hardly a feat.. all the developed countries brought a man back home alive, now if they killed him on the first flight.. now that would be light years ahead.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
    1. Re:inidans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But india isnt a developed country, it's a 3rd world country, you don't exepect what you expect out of US, EU, Russia and China from a country like India where people still urniate on the streets.

    2. Re:inidans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People don't urinate on Moscow, Beijing or NY streets?

    3. Re:inidans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do they urinate and defecate in those places as they do in India? I say they are a buch of monkeys, no wonder their god is a freaking circus act.

    4. Re:inidans by Bugmaster · · Score: 1

      Actually, we don't know how many Russian cosmonauts and their Chinese counterparts have died before the successfull mission was televised. Remember: these are totalitarian countries, they don't have freedom of the press, they can do whatever they want.

      --
      >|<*:=
  36. Hopefully the start of another space race.... by Desmoden · · Score: 4, Insightful


    While it will take time for places like China to really catch up with us, it's not as long as some might think.

    The US space program is a MESS. Shuttle launches aren't even news worthy anymore unless they blow up. (no offense intended, those who died are still heroes in my mind). But without a challenge, our space program will continue to lag.

    We need more countries like China to catch up. We need someone to out pace us and kick start the US interest in space.

    Hopefull this will be the first step. ....or we could tell Bush there is oil on Mars =)

    1. Re:Hopefully the start of another space race.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heroes in your mind, deepfried mincemeat in the real world. Reality's a bitch, ain't it?

    2. Re:Hopefully the start of another space race.... by PMM · · Score: 0

      mmmm... heroic deepfried mincemeat.

    3. Re:Hopefully the start of another space race.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or WMD's

    4. Re:Hopefully the start of another space race.... by Cordath · · Score: 5, Insightful

      China is actually coming along nicely in a lot of ways. It's beginning to embrace capitalism. Socialism is a nice idea, but greed breeds innovation better. As China's economy heats up it's people are going to come into closer contact with the rest of the world and mainstream world ideas. The communist regime might not be overthrown, but its a safe bet they're going to gradually become more and more moderate. With China's vast natural resources and immense population their economy could easily dwarf that of the U.S. within a couple decades. Say what you will, 1 billion+ is a heckuva tax base!

      Keep in mind that skilled labour costs in China are a fraction of what they are in the U.S.. The resources of China's space program could easily dwarf those of NASA long before their economy grows larger than that of the U.S.. (This assumes both nations spend a similar proportion of their GDP on their space programs. China may well value it higher and spend even more...) As has been said, they don't exactly have to reinvent every wheel that has led NASA to it's current cutting-edge 1970's shuttle program either. There are plenty of capitalists, many of them in the U.S., who would only be too glad to do a little Cantonese consulting.

      This isn't necessarily how things will happen. However, if the Chinese don't do anything stupid their economic and technological superiority is functionally inevitable provided U.S. citizens don't start multiplying like mosquitoes. It's a simple matter of statistics unless you subscribe to some sort of white supremast movment and belive that Chinese minds are inherently inferior.

      Personally, I'm thinking it might be a good idea to start early on those Cantonese lessons. :D

    5. Re:Hopefully the start of another space race.... by Mr.Spaz · · Score: 1

      You might want to learn Mandarin as opposed to Cantonese. As the official state language in China, you'll be able to communicate with almost everyone in the country, as opposed to just the southern areas.

    6. Re:Hopefully the start of another space race.... by DreamMaster · · Score: 1

      Does anyone else remember the Well World series by Jack Chalker? The main character, Nathan Brazil, said pretty much the same thing - randomness had interfered in Earth's development such that it follows our current history - the USSR collapsed and the cold war ended; and without anyone to challenge the US and keep them active the space program suffered as a result.

      He was right on the mark. The US needs to have a strong competitor. Otherwise it just tends to stagnate.

    7. Re:Hopefully the start of another space race.... by goon+america · · Score: 1
      China is actually coming along nicely in a lot of ways. It's beginning to embrace capitalism. Socialism is a nice idea, but greed breeds innovation better. As China's economy heats up it's people are going to come into closer contact with the rest of the world and mainstream world ideas. The communist regime might not be overthrown, but its a safe bet they're going to gradually become more and more moderate. With China's vast natural resources and immense population their economy could easily dwarf that of the U.S. within a couple decades. Say what you will, 1 billion+ is a heckuva tax base!

      Things will get better and better and better and better! Trust me, it's only a matter of time!

      .... this isn't the only time I've seen it, but I've never seen so many otherwise level-headed people buy into evidenceless assertions about the future about China. Sure it's a nice theory that China will slowly slide down an inevitable slippery slope to a capitalist democracy, but can you give me a reason why I should find this rationally compelling?

    8. Re:Hopefully the start of another space race.... by Cordath · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's already happening. The chinese goverment now allows capitalist buisnesses and they're springing up like mad to take advantage of cheap labor costs that allow them to make a killing in exports. Not all of the "made in china" goods out there are junk either.

      Take the audiophile loudspeaker market for example. www.av123.com is a U.S. firm which markets chinese made audiophile speakers (by a capitalist chinese company) that apparantly do quite well against the likes of Linn, B&W, Paradigm, etc.. (Don't even talk to me about Bose!) Some other american companies (whose names I will not mention here so as to avoid a flame war) import chinese speakers that sell for $100-200 in the asian market, rebadge them, and sell them in the U.S. for several thousand dollars. It is a common practice for the american company to ink an agreement with the chinese company barring them from exporting speakers directly to the U.S. except through them. That way U.S. citizens can't go to the source and pay cost. This has ruffled a lot of audiophile feathers, but is it really a scam if they are of equal quality to domestic speakers of the same price?

      I suggest you take an inventory of the items in your home and compare how many were made in china to how many were made in the U.S.. You might be surprised.

    9. Re:Hopefully the start of another space race.... by Jardine · · Score: 1

      Hopefull this will be the first step. ....or we could tell Bush there is oil on Mars =)

      Oil on Mars.

    10. Re:Hopefully the start of another space race.... by doricee · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't hold my breath for Chinese Democracy, even with the exposure to the West. They've had relatively stable totalitarian governments for ~5000 years. The culture is built around maintaining it. Look at the values promoted in that society. Humility? Conformity? Honor? Obedience? Even Asian nations with historical Chinese influence have had a difficult time with Democracy and it's associated values. Vietnam, communist totalitarian state. North Korea, communist totalitarian state. Singapore, totalitarian state. Both South Korea & Taiwan were a totalitarian states into the 1990's. And even today, they maintain rather tight controls on the populace. You ever see how the South Korean government handles labor strikes? Japan didn't exactly adopt the Republic voluntarily either... I guess I'm just not buying the idea of Chinese Democracy in my lifetime. and I'm in my early twenties.

    11. Re:Hopefully the start of another space race.... by PatrickThomson · · Score: 1

      Those who died weren't heroes any more than the other, still living, shuttle crews are heroes. DOes dying in a horrible accident make you a hero? Does being mown down whilst crossing the road, or being shot by accident, make you a hero? No, it just makes you unlucky.

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    12. Re:Hopefully the start of another space race.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, virtually all of China speaks Mandarin. You'll find Cantonese only in the southernmost regions and, of course, Hong Kong. So don't sign up for those lessons too quickly :)

      You make some good points about the ascendancy of China, but don't overlook the fact that they have a massive peasant underclass, an average income of around $700 per person, and a lot of social problems to solve before they take on the USA.

      The thing the Chinese are good at is making bets that pay off in for future generations. I don't see much of that coming out of Washington these days.

    13. Re:Hopefully the start of another space race.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing the Chinese are good at is making bets that pay off in for future generations. I don't see much of that coming out of Washington these days.

      Yeah, for example the leasing of Hong Kong to Great Britain for 99 years was a stroke of genious, at least in retrospect.

      I bet the British negotiators walked away from the table thinking, stupid Chinese, Hong Kong is ours forever!

      While the Chinese negotiators was smugly thinking, Hong Kong is ours, and the stupid British will build and develop it for our great grandchildren for free!

    14. Re:Hopefully the start of another space race.... by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      if the Chinese don't do anything stupid their economic and technological superiority is functionally inevitable provided U.S. citizens don't start multiplying like mosquitoes.

      History is full of inevitable things that didn't happen, and full of improbable things that did. See my earlier post about Cheng Ho for just one example.

      It's a simple matter of statistics unless you subscribe to some sort of white supremast movment and belive that Chinese minds are inherently inferior.

      LOL! You really don't know history do you? Or politics or economics for that matter. It is never a "simple matter of statistics". Again, see my earlier post.

    15. Re:Hopefully the start of another space race.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hong Kong. After the return of Hong Kong to China in 1997, China saw a huge boost in its economy, and the leadership realized "This isn't so bad". Almost immediately after Hong Kong's return, they turned the city of Shenzhen, which is about 10 miles north of the islands into a "Special Economic Zone".

      What that means is that, for almost all purposes, Shenzhen is a capitalist city. You can open and run a business there and make money with it there. This has been a big success so far, so much so that they turned Shanghai into a SEZ a few years later.

      Three major cities in China are now effectively capitalist. Combined with the aging hardline communists currently in leadership, and the younger, more capitalistically oriented party members below them, you can pretty much guarantee the creation of more of these SEZs and a general loosening of communist policy everywhere.

      It's got a long way to go, but they are making definite and significant progress.

    16. Re:Hopefully the start of another space race.... by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      if the Chinese don't do anything stupid their economic and technological superiority is functionally inevitable provided U.S. citizens don't start multiplying like mosquitoes.

      History is full of inevitable things that didn't happen, and full of improbable things that did. See my earlier post about Cheng Ho for just one example.

      It's a simple matter of statistics unless you subscribe to some sort of white supremast movment and belive that Chinese minds are inherently inferior.

      LOL! You really don't know history do you? Or politics or economics for that matter. It is never a "simple matter of statistics". Again, see my earlier post.

    17. Re:Hopefully the start of another space race.... by CommieLib · · Score: 1

      History is full of inevitable things that didn't happen, and full of improbable things that did..

      I'm afraid I must expropriate that for my sig, my friend.

      --
      If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
    18. Re:Hopefully the start of another space race.... by hey! · · Score: 1

      It's beginning to embrace capitalism.

      Yes, but crony capitalism.

      China's trying to do something that has never succeeded in the long term: to build a non-democratic capitalist society. In democratic societies, the inevitable disparities in economic power are offset by political freedoms and the ability of the masses to revolt -- in the ballot box.

      Democracy and capitalism have to go together, even if (or perhaps because) to some degree their underlying values are different. Without the check of political democracy, capitalist society is unstable. In a capitalist society, innovation cannot thrive unless there is freedom of expression, and free thinking innovators will not be content to be ruled by any clique. The only political system that will permit these people to be creative, and which in the end they will consent to be governed by (whether or not they LIKE the government), is a democratic one.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    19. Re:Hopefully the start of another space race.... by kavau · · Score: 1
      Personally, I'm thinking it might be a good idea to start early on those Cantonese lessons. :D

      The official language in China (both PRC and ROC) is Mandarin. Cantonese is spoken only in Hong Kong (and surrounding areas).

    20. Re:Hopefully the start of another space race.... by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      China's trying to do something that has never succeeded in the long term: to build a non-democratic capitalist society. In democratic societies, the inevitable disparities in economic power are offset by political freedoms and the ability of the masses to revolt -- in the ballot box.

      Define "long term."

      Europe was captialist for centuries before democracy took hold--and they largely propspered through the 1800s and early 1900s as a bunch of non-democratic capitalist states.

      Democracy just perpetuates because it's a more efficient means of revolution.

    21. Re:Hopefully the start of another space race.... by Buskaatt · · Score: 1

      "....or we could tell Bush there is oil on Mars =)"

      Even that wouldn't help. The US is losing so many technological races now (stem cell research comes to mind first) because the US ideology is no longer based on innovation. It's based on getting home from work, popping a beer, and watching Friends over some KFC. We are the Rome of the millennium and the aqueducts have just begun to degrade. Enjoy the slide.

    22. Re:Hopefully the start of another space race.... by jafac · · Score: 1

      "Socialism is a nice idea, but greed breeds innovation better."

      As long as you keep the greed in check, and don't reward unchecked greed, fraud, and abuse (as our present system in the US does). Greed is a handy whip to use as a motivator. But if you let it get out of hand, it's dog eat dog, and then. . . why did we start walking on our hind legs again? That's not civilization. It's living like brutal animals.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    23. Re:Hopefully the start of another space race.... by Desmoden · · Score: 1

      Oh, I totally agree. One could even argue the ones who do it now are even bigger heroes =)

    24. Re:Hopefully the start of another space race.... by hemants22 · · Score: 1

      I Think this was just an political issue and chinese goverment is doing nothing more than wasting there tax payers money, And we guys dont need at all to discuss it out here. I dont think they are dam interested in doing some actual progress in research, They just wanted to show the world they can also do it and so they do all this propoganda...Sounds so childish and funny, Country with biggest population of world iguess needs tobe more intellectual. Indeed what they would have done is work more closely with countries who have already achieved this and try doing some REAL good stuff which would have been really some helpful to humankind instead of wasting money in re-inventing the wheel.

  37. Poor guy..... by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    I am sure he'll be dead with 3 weeks.

  38. why are we competing? by seriv · · Score: 1

    Congrats to China. But think what we would have if we had an international space program. This would (hopefully) overcome competion of science, there all trying to advance science, China is entering the game now. I know it doesn't seem like there is much competition in the space world, but in unmanned missions, we are all in competition. Projects the the International space station are dominated by the U.S. First step is for the U.S. to stop pissing off other countries.
    -Seriv

  39. Just received this email from a source in China ;) by Dave21212 · · Score: 1


    From:megaspam@fgfgreg114.cn
    To: "Dave21212@slashdot.com"
    Subject: OFFER OFFER OFFER ! KT (space travel) 5hsdrsheher44y4w2112
    Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2003 20:29:16 +0900
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/html;

    Space flight 4-U !!! 2-DAY
    Acting now to get chance to go with space flight !

    see wedsite for details !


    Anti- SPAM Policy Disclaimer: Under Bills.1618 Title III passed by the 105th U.S. Congress, mail cannot be considered Spam as long as we include contact information and a remove link for removal from this mailing list. If this e-mail is unsolicited, please accept our apologies. Per the proposed H.R. 3113 Unsolicited Commercial Electronic Mail Act of 2000, further transmission to you by the sender may be stopped at NO COST to you!

    --
    "Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech."--Benjamin Franklin
  40. Re:good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Space is big. Space is dark. It's hard to find a place to park.

  41. Good. by Valar · · Score: 1

    Maybe we can have another space race now. Maybe I'll be able to go to the moon this time. Maybe they'll make me go to the moon this time.

  42. Time to fork slashdot by nmoog · · Score: 2, Troll

    Wow, these racist posts are getting pretty full on - racial slurs about black americans get modded down into oblivion and racial slurs about anyone else get modded to the stars.

    It seems like the time is right to split slashdot into us.slashdot.org and wholeworld.slashdot.org.

    Or maybe under14s.slashdot.org and over14s.slashdot.org

    1. Re:Time to fork slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I usually don't reply to trolls complaining about trolls but....

      I applaud you that you despise racists and racist comments; but,

      Look, dip-wad. Making blanket statements concerning racial slurs as purely a US problem is just as discriminatory as saying all US citizens are racists by your proposal to force US citizens to post to us.slashdot.org because they're all racists.

      You're right about one thing, though - perhaps you should be posting to under14s.slashdot.org.

      I could go on but I'm tired, I have a head-ache and dumb-ass statements like yours hardly warrant the time I put into this rebuttal.

    2. Re:Time to fork slashdot by Bagels · · Score: 1

      I hate to say this, but I have seen far more adults make racial slurs than teenagers... unfortunately, even my own grandmother has been a culprit on occasion. Of course, I live in a bit of a sheltered area, and the teenagers make far more homosexual-bashing remarks than the adults, so that's to be taken with a grain of salt. Still, it's not the teenagers that went to Vietnam and called their enemies and comrades alike "gooks", nor did they live through World War II when the common word for a person of Japanese descent was "jap".

      --
      --- Bwah?
    3. Re:Time to fork slashdot by aiyo · · Score: 0, Troll

      This guy is right. There are two thing I hate most in this world, racism and the Chinese.

    4. Re: Time to fork slashdot by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > and racial slurs about anyone else get modded to the stars.

      Hey, maybe Team Slashdot could put someone in orbit too!

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    5. Re:Time to fork slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The U.S. isn't a seperate *race* from most Europeans at least. I can only speak for myself, but I agree with the grand-parent post. As a white European it certainly does appear that th U.S. is one of the more racist extant societies. Simply pointing out differnces like this wouldn't be racist, even if it were divided by some race-line, as long as it were true - which in this case, I think, it is.

    6. Re:Time to fork slashdot by cyril3 · · Score: 1
      when the common word for a person of Japanese descent was "jap

      If Japs is racist slang then you can't call me an Aussie anymore, Yank.

    7. Re:Time to fork slashdot by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      racial slurs about anyone else get modded to the stars.

      What around here is a "racial slur", exactly?

      I've seen one joke about food quality, which is not racial.
      And I've seen one joke about the inability of Europeans to distinguish between Asians.

      Which of those offends you, and why?

    8. Re:Time to fork slashdot by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Or anyone who questions the accuracy or truthfulness of the reports.

      Now THERE'S a conspiracy, kids.

      Give me $100, and I can accurately reenact the entire Chinese launch, just give me an existing satellite for it to coincide with, and we can have a few million from the X-Prize.;)

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    9. Re:Time to fork slashdot by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Silly fellow strayun - you need to think more about life in the states, where the worst thing anybody could be mistaken for isn't a paedophile, or a rapist, a communist or a murderer- It's a bigot. Your average american is scared to death of being labeled a racist, a sexist, or a homophobe, and will point the finger at everybody around him to make sure nobody thinks he's one.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    10. Re:Time to fork slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I didn't realize that 'Chinese' was a race. Perhaps there was some evolutionary step that I missed?

      Thank you for your time,
      Too lazy to register

    11. Re:Time to fork slashdot by frycarson · · Score: 1
      I know I'm afraid of being considered racist, i scream racial slurs like no tommorow when playing games, but thats only because I live in one of them housing projects. Screw it, being afraid of being considered a bigot is pointless. If your racist, deal with. I am damned tired of n-word punks calling me a white whatever the hell they say. need to learn how to enunciate. I'm not realy racist, so much as stereotypist. Act liek a {racial slur here}, get treated like a {racial slur here}. I'm a pathetic white boy, I know it, and I don't care if i'm treated like a pathetic white boy. BTW, I love making fun of stereotypical white trash southerners, and a bad british accent.

      FryCarson. I might be retarded, but who cares?

    12. Re:Time to fork slashdot by ejito · · Score: 1

      dictionary.com:

      Jap ( P ) Pronunciation Key (jp)
      n. Offensive Slang

      Used as a disparaging term for a person of Japanese birth or descent.

      Aussie is not a race or ethnicity dumbass.

    13. Re:Time to fork slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow. the truly amusing thing about this post is that communist gets lumped together with pedophiles rapists and muderers.

    14. Re:Time to fork slashdot by ccmay · · Score: 1
      the truly amusing thing about this post is that communist gets lumped together with pedophiles rapists and muderers.

      Screw you. Communists are the all-time world champions of mass murder. Adolf Hitler wasn't a patch on Mao and Stalin.

      If you'd lost relatives to the Gulag, maybe you wouldn't find it so "amusing", you insensitive piece of shit. Any decent human being ought to be ashamed to be a Communist or to be associated with them.

      God, do I hate Communists and all their wooly-minded socialist brethren. The only place collectivism works is an ant hill or a concentration camp. Everywhere else it must be SMASHED and thrown on the dung heap of history.

      -ccm

      --
      Too much Law; not enough Order.
    15. Re:Time to fork slashdot by G-funk · · Score: 1

      the truly amusing thing about this post is that communist gets lumped together with pedophiles rapists and muderer

      Why? In the 50s, people were incacerated if they were thought to be communists, I'd not like to be incacerated because of what somebody thinks I believe, wether it's because they think i believe stalin was grouse, or if they think i believe it's ok to sleep with little kids, i'm still in gaol.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  43. Like Stephen Baxter wrote by garrulous · · Score: 1

    in Manifold: Space. The spirit of our people is asleep. I just hope this is enough of a wakeup call. If it isn't, in 25 years we may be just as planet-locked as Iraq is land-locked, and with the Chinese playing gate keeper to boot.

    1. Re:Like Stephen Baxter wrote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iraq is land locked? Granted their coastline may not be much longer than New Hampshire's, but they do have access to the Persian Gulf.

    2. Re:Like Stephen Baxter wrote by garrulous · · Score: 1
      landlocked ( P ) Pronunciation Key (lndlkt) adj. 1. Entirely or almost entirely surrounded by land: a landlocked country.

      Emphasis mine

    3. Re:Like Stephen Baxter wrote by whorfin · · Score: 1

      Well, given that, I hope that we are significantly more planet-locked than Iraq is landlocked. I suspect that having a small intersection with another planet would be considerably worse than losing the list.

      --
      Laugh while you can, monkey-boy!
    4. Re:Like Stephen Baxter wrote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iraq still doesn't qualify. See www.unctad.org for example.

  44. Cool! by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    Since it worked, no one will be killed by the state for their failure. Thus, saving their families from paying for the bullet used to kill them!

  45. On teh intarweb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nobody knows you're not drunk.

  46. what this says is: by geekoid · · Score: 1

    we have now proven we can put an object in space, change its trajectory, then put it anywhere in the world.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:what this says is: by grozzie2 · · Score: 1
      we have now proven we can put an object in space, change its trajectory, then put it anywhere in the world

      The harp gun project in the 60's was capable of launching projectiles into space, the highest launch achieved on an atmospheric test package was 170KM. The project ran from a Canadian University on the guise of doing high altitude research, but, the real research, was to attempt to build a payload package that included guidance and propellant sufficient to achieve orbit. The project was funded by the US military. The project was never viewed as a serious 'space threat' by other countries because the technical difficulties of creating a guidance package that could withstand the 2300 g launch were pretty big obstacles, and to create a nuke that could survive that was unthinkable.

      Missle programs were another story, it was techically feasable to use a missle to launch a nuke and in theory drop it anywhere in the world. Besides the issue of launch vehicle reliability, there were a whole mess of other issues to demonstrate that such a program would indeed work. Compared to a bullet, a nuke is a rather fragile and complex piece of equipment, so you cant subject it to the types of forces you subject a standard conventional payload to during the delivery phase.

      To really demonstrate to the 'other guys' that the ordinance delivery system is truely capable of providing an environment capable of supporting a nuke from liftoff to arrival at target, its really simple, stick a man inside it. If the human body can withstand the rigors of the launch forces, and the vehicle can be dropped back to earth on a precise target, with the human intact, a lot of things have been demonstrated. The most important one though is this, if the human can survive the trip, the forces/temperatures involved are such, a nuclear payload can survive, and be operational when it arrives on target.

      The same way that Russia and subsequently the USA demonstrated to the world that they had a launch system capable of providing a ride gentle enough for a nuclear device, yet capable of arriving anywhere in the world, China has just provided the same proof. The on orbit maneuver is a critical component of this demonstration.

      Not only have they demonstrated they can put an object into orbit, maneuver it, and then land it on/near a target, they have concisely demonstrated that the vehicle provides an environment to deliver a very fragile package, probably the most fragile of all weapons, a human body. That's pretty much de-facto proof that a nuclear device can survive the same trip.

    2. Re:what this says is: by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Everything you are saying is kind of obsolete. At one time, launching into space was required to build ICBMs. But that isn't the case anymore. China is already known to have ICBMs (I'm not sure of the date but I think they developed it in the 70's or 80's). Furthermore, launching humans is not required; lauching satellites is good enough. Lastly, North Korea is rumoured to have ICBMs. I'm not sure how correct that is, but if it were true, it is further proof that ICBMs aren't a big deal anymore.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  47. We are losing an edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congrats Chineese! When I was young I wanted to be an astronaut. My dream would never materialize... I hope once China will become second superpower we will spend more money on space explorqation converting dreams into life. But what worries me more we are loosing edge in computers to India and China (look where our companies outsource projects). In the worst case half of our R&D will be done in India and China by 2010. The only thing we worry about - stock value. If we will not bring new generation of engineers into space program right away people who brought a man to the moon will retire and take their skills with them.

  48. YFI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YFI.

  49. Re:wow by Exiler · · Score: 1

    You must be mistaken, this is the post about CHINA sending a man into orbit, not Alabama.

    --
    Banaaaana!
  50. I don't know about you by jsse · · Score: 1

    but it's really a pleasant surprise for a country's GDP below developed countries standard could send a man into space, way ahead the other Asian countries like India, whose heavily backed by US, and Japan, which has well-advanced technologies and economy, in this regard.

    What's so good about yet another country throwing people into space? It shows that the largest country in Asia spends their focus and resources in the advancement of human's benevolence, rather than overwhelming military power, which already undergone huge cut in China in recent years.

    It can be seen in India(offical) and Japan's(inofficial) announcement that they're pretty eating sour grape in all this. Think about the plus side! China spends effort on something other than militarily threating your nations. Look at your insane neighbour North Korea.

    1. Re:I don't know about you by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

      What planet are you from? The space race was, and is, a method for proving that your ballistic missile technology is reliable and well-established without sabre-rattling.
      AND... China spent this money even though large numbers of people in their own country struggle in abject poverty.
      AND ...China spends a larger percentage of their GDP on the military than the US. According to the US government docs I could find, the US spends 4% of their GDP on their military. China spends 68-80 billion a year, which, although less money than spent by the US, is a significantly larger percentage of their GDP than US spending is.

    2. Re:I don't know about you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      according to wikipedia GDP of China is 5700 billion
      so your figure translates to 1.4% of GDP

      USA is the country that spend the most in military both in terms of percentage of GDP or absolute value

    3. Re:I don't know about you by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      Actually the 'official' reaction is that India has different priorities; ISRO wants to use satellite technology for the 'common man', but that it can do it anytime it wants. (Which, of course, is technically correct; the launch technology is there, but we'll need to develop life-support systems and, more importantly, mission-handling stuff like planning and all that)

      It is the unofficial reaction (ie, from jingoistic editorials) that is sour-grapes-like; ToI, for instance, called the launch a Great Creep Forward. (which, of course, is stupid, considering that India's moon mission in 2008, Chandrayaan -1, will be unmanned)

      Btw, I don't know why people here presume this, but GDP's have never had an influence on any technology growth. Innovation has always been a result of things other mere funding; your (ie American) history itself is replete with examples.

    4. Re:I don't know about you by jsse · · Score: 1

      AND... China spent this money even though large numbers of people in their own country struggle in abject poverty.

      This is true. Sadly.

      AND ...China spends a larger percentage of their GDP on the military than the US. According to the US government docs I could find, the US spends 4% of their GDP on their military. China spends 68-80 billion a year, which, although less money than spent by the US, is a significantly larger percentage of their GDP than US spending is.

      Your figure is quite wrong. According to People Daily. The military budget for 2002 is around 166.2 billion yuan, while their estimated GDP for 2002 is around 10.217 trillion yuan. Therefore China only spends around 1.62% GDP on military.

      While US spent US$343.2 billion on military out of US$10.4 GDP, which is 3.3% GDP on military - more than a double whereas in China.

      What planet are you from?

      I can tell from you nearly fictional facts and figures we are definitely not living in the same planet or dimension. :)

    5. Re:I don't know about you by praksys · · Score: 1

      Your figure is quite wrong. According to People Daily. The military budget for 2002 is around 166.2 billion yuan, while their estimated GDP for 2002 is around 10.217 trillion yuan. Therefore China only spends around 1.62% GDP on military.

      Actually your figure is quite wrong. It is the officially anounced figure, but that it is not an accurate measure of how much China is actually spending on its military forces. Estimates of actual spending vary from about 3.5% to 5% of GDP.

    6. Re:I don't know about you by jsse · · Score: 1

      Estimates of actual spending vary from about 3.5% to 5% of GDP.

      Thank you for sending this bit of information to me.

      However, do you bother to actually read what you sent to people? In this article:

      1989 Military exp./GDP(real total): 2.6
      ...
      1998 Military exp./GDP(real total): 1.9

      Your figure is only up to 1998, while mind is 2002's. Anyway, I think my figure 1.6% is very close to the trend as listed in your article. Nevertheless, never has China in any given time in history exceed USA in military/GDP.

      Near the end of the articule:

      2. The resources available to the Chinese military have increased by about 75 percent since 1989 (see column 5 of table 7D.5).
      Yes, but:
      3. As a share of GDP, Chinese military expenditure has steadily declined

      In conclusion:

      It is unlikely that China's overall military expenditure will exceed 2.5 per cent of GDP for the foreseeable future.

      May be I'm mistaken. You sent this to support my view.....hmmm, thanks. :)

      (Btw, why do you Americans have to be in such a denial mood when people tell you your country spends a lot in military?)

    7. Re:I don't know about you by praksys · · Score: 1

      Get a clue, and go look for a 2002 figure. Try Google, it worked fine for me.

    8. Re:I don't know about you by jsse · · Score: 1

      I did give 2002 figure up the thread. Scroll up, the page-up key for me.

    9. Re:I don't know about you by praksys · · Score: 1

      http://www.nationmaster.com/country/ch/Military
      h ttp://www.faqs.org/docs/factbook/print/ch.html

    10. Re:I don't know about you by praksys · · Score: 1

      In absolute terms yes, the US spends more than any other single country, but not in % of GDP terms.

      http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/allied_contrib20 00 /chartIII-3.html

    11. Re:I don't know about you by jsse · · Score: 1

      Oh...thanks a lot, I use nationmaster a lot, but I kinda need the figures in faqs link you provide. :)

      Who said /. is counter-productive. :)

    12. Re:I don't know about you by jsse · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute...let see, GDP 2002 is 6 trillions, while military spending ranges from $45 billion to $65 billion for 2002. Let's take the maximum spending we got.....*gasp* only 1.08%? It's even less than we argued over. :D

      Interesting. :)

    13. Re:I don't know about you by praksys · · Score: 1
      Sigh. From the CIA factbook again...

      Military expenditures - dollar figure: This entry gives current military expenditures in US dollars; the figure is calculated by multiplying the estimated defense spending in percentage terms by the gross domestic product (GDP) calculated on an exchange rate basis not purchasing power parity (PPP) terms. Dollar figures for military expenditures should be treated with caution because of different price patterns and accounting methods among nations, as well as wide variations in the strength of their currencies.

      GDP: This entry gives the gross domestic product (GDP) or value of all final goods and services produced within a nation in a given year. GDP dollar estimates in the Factbook are derived from purchasing power parity (PPP) calculations. See the note on GDP methodology for more information.


      Spot the difference? The military expenditure figure is an actual dollar figure. The GDP figure is a PPP value. You can't get the % of GDP figure for military expenditure by just dividing one by the other.

      The CIA is not entirely reliable, but they can do arithmetic. If you make use of these sites then you could at least make the effort to find out what the numbers mean.

    14. Re:I don't know about you by jsse · · Score: 1

      Thank you very much.

    15. Re:I don't know about you by Stephen+Ma · · Score: 1
      In absolute terms yes, the US spends more than any other single country, but not in % of GDP terms. http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/allied_contrib2000 /chartIII-3.html

      That chart is for 1999, before Bush II.

    16. Re:I don't know about you by praksys · · Score: 1

      Defense spending as a fraction of GDP has gone up slighlty since 2000. It is now around 3.5% of GDP, which is still far below places like Saudi Arabia.

    17. Re:I don't know about you by Stephen+Ma · · Score: 1
      Defense spending as a fraction of GDP has gone up slighlty since 2000. It is now around 3.5% of GDP, which is still far below places like Saudi Arabia.

      According to the Annual Defense Report by Donald Rumsfeld, the defense budget, adjusted for inflation, has risen from $310 billion in 1999 to $379 billion in 2003, which is a jump of 22 percent -- hardly "slight".

      Furthermore, the report was written before the invasion of Iraq, the costs of which will probably push the defense budget to well over 5% of GDP. This is likely to exceed everybody but the corrupt and insane kleptocracies of the Middle East.

    18. Re:I don't know about you by praksys · · Score: 1

      According to the Annual Defense Report by Donald Rumsfeld, the defense budget, adjusted for inflation, has risen from $310 billion in 1999 to $379 billion in 2003, which is a jump of 22 percent -- hardly "slight".

      Over a period of four years, that included a major attack on the US, and two major wars, 22% is a very modest increase. It works out to about 5% growth per year. Over the same period total US government spending grew by around 10% per year.

      Furthermore, the report was written before the invasion of Iraq, the costs of which will probably push the defense budget to well over 5% of GDP.

      Not according to any estimates that I have seen. I suppose that if you ignore economic growth, and count reconstruction costs in Iraq as defense spending, then you might get to a figure like that, but there is no reason why those costs should count as defense spending when other types of foreign aid do not.

      This is likely to exceed everybody but the corrupt and insane kleptocracies of the Middle East.

      It is unlikely to exceed any other country that is at war.

    19. Re:I don't know about you by Stephen+Ma · · Score: 1
      Over a period of four years, that included a major attack on the US, and two major wars, 22% is a very modest increase.

      Sorry, I see one war, not two. Fiscal Years 2000-2003 cover only Afghanistan, which New York City alone could probably have defeated. Iraq comes under FY 2004, and that is when the budgetary pain will become evident.

      I suppose that if you ignore economic growth, and count reconstruction costs in Iraq as defense spending, then you might get to a figure like that, but there is no reason why those costs should count as defense spending when other types of foreign aid do not.

      No invasion of Iraq, no reconstruction costs. Thus it is perfectly legitimate to consider the latter as part of the defense budget.

      If the neocons have their way, 5% of GDP would be only the beginning of the pressure on the treasury. Syria is evidently next on the program; after that would be an endless series of further conquests and reconstructions, and frequent pacifications and repacifications of rebellious populations. The neverending strain on the treasury is what will eventually break the U.S., just as it broke the Soviet Union and the Roman Empire.

    20. Re:I don't know about you by praksys · · Score: 1

      No invasion of Iraq, no reconstruction costs. Thus it is perfectly legitimate to consider the latter as part of the defense budget.

      No Mexican-American war, no Federal spending for the states of Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico and Utah. Are you going to start counting that as military expenditure as well? If you start counting anything at all related to war or the military then sure you get a higher figure, but it will be useless for international comparisons, because you will not be able to get similar standardized figures for any other country (any idea how much the occupation of Tibet costs China, for example?).

      If the neocons have their way, 5% of GDP would be only the beginning of the pressure on the treasury. Syria is evidently next on the program; after that would be an endless series of further conquests and reconstructions, and frequent pacifications and repacifications of rebellious populations. The neverending strain on the treasury is what will eventually break the U.S., just as it broke the Soviet Union and the Roman Empire.

      Hmmm...well the US was spending 8% of GDP on the military at the end of the cold war, and had often spent more than that when engaged in "hot" wars, like Vietnam and Korea. The USSR spent around 15% of GDP for decades before it collapsed (and that spending level was only one part of cause of the collapse of the Soviet Empire). The Roman empire may well have been worn down by wars all over the place - but it took centuries for that to result in the collapse of the Roman Empire.

      If US military spending trippled, and then stayed at that level for a decade, then maybe the US would have a problem.

  51. Money Spent by batboi · · Score: 1

    The money that they spent, on the space mission, would benefit the poor folk that are struggling to make ends meet in china.

    1. Re:Money Spent by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because we don't have poor people in the United States living on the streets, in trailer parks, and in slums. It's all right for us to spend billions researching how ants interact in space (and spend much, much, much less on problems on earth), but it's not all right for China to do the very same, and albeit, spend much, much, much less on the space program. Hypocrisy.

    2. Re:Money Spent by dadman · · Score: 1

      The money, effort and time spent for launching a manned spaceship, is insignificant when compared to raising the poor's living standard.

      Going to space will help China in many ways, including establishing factories in the orbit to produce various medicine in low cost. This will have a direct benifit to those millions of poor and perhaps in a faster way.

    3. Re:Money Spent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, the USA is waisting cash on ants? Who will they ever help you kill of the rest of the world?

    4. Re:Money Spent by vidarh · · Score: 1
      That money is insignificant compared to the benefits to Chinese economy in proving that they have the technology, and the confidence in their technology, to launch manned missions. Satellite launches are big business, and demonstrating capability like this will do a lot to boost China as a viable partner for launches.

      Also, most of the money pumped into this will go to Chinese industry in the form of purchase of products and services.

      China has more or less established now that there are only three countries that matters when it comes to space launches: US, Russia and China, and of the three the US is still paralyzed by the Columbia accident, and Russia can barely afford to meet their ISS obligations.

      I assume that you would also like the US and Russia to cancel their space programs to benefit their poor as well?

  52. Pics would be nice by DaleBob · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if any amateur astronomers have verified the launch? The media on this is so controlled by the Chinese gov't, skepticism is definitely in order (really for any story coming out of the Chinese media). It's all about independent sources. Unfortunately, NASA would never say, "We checked it out; they weren't lying!" Not a great thing for international relations.

    What I love is the report that the taikonaut was reading a flight manual during flight... "Now was I supposed to push the green button or the red button?"

    1. Re:Pics would be nice by dakryx · · Score: 1

      Close as you'll get to nasa saying they weren't lieing.
      http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2003/oct/ HQ_03333_ china.html

    2. Re:Pics would be nice by sniggly · · Score: 1
      You seriously believe this could have been a hoax? What they called a space flight manual simply is a kind of checklist they repeat so often until they can recite it after just having woken up, just like Nasa astronauts.

      This guy has been in space and did a great many orbits, many more than Gagarin or Shepard in theirs. Shepards run was suborbital. In 1962 Glenn took his vehicle for 3 spins around the earth. Yang is 21 hours, 14 orbits.

      I'm kind of amazed by the nationalist drivel around this. We don't hear a lot from the PLA's propaganda machine but this is almost back to the 60's.. "I feel proud of my motherland," pretty uncool. Sounds like the PLA is as

      --
      Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
    3. Re:Pics would be nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah... of course they can do better. They've got FOURTY years of technological advance. They're also FOURTY years late.

    4. Re:Pics would be nice by sniggly · · Score: 1
      And in another FOURTY years (good morning UK:) they're predicted to be well ahead of the pack economically. Kind of pointless to belittle their achievements.

      http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=U TF-8&q=goldman+sachs+%22The+Path+to+2050%22&btnG=G oogle+Search

      --
      Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
    5. Re:Pics would be nice by DaleBob · · Score: 1

      Actually, I don't believe it's a hoax. It was more a comment on the government controlled media in China... it's funny how they think the rest of the world will simply believe all of their statements without backing anything up with real proof or allowing independent observers to act as witness. The level of paranoia is extraordinary.

      And of course he did more orbits than Gagarin or Shepard... that's nationaliostic drivel for you. Technologically, in the current millenium, the difference between 3 orbits and 14 orbits isn't that big. I'm more surprised they didn't send up two taikonauts and make one of them do a spacewalk all on the first mission, just so they could talk it up to their own citizens.

    6. Re:Pics would be nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah what I really find special about this is the 70s type communist propaganda that surrounds this event. While much of eastern China is rapidly industrializing and modernising there's still this hard code red china peoples liberation army acting as if nothing has ever changed. Hopefully its a bit milder than in the past..

    7. Re:Pics would be nice by spike+hay · · Score: 1

      And in another FOURTY years (good morning UK:) they're predicted to be well ahead of the pack economically. Kind of pointless to belittle their achievements.

      It irritates me that people constantly say that "China is forty years behind the U.S. and the U.S.S.R." Well, actually, our best manned spaceflight technology is over twenty years old. (The space shuttle. Actually, the Soyuz is a overall better craft.) The Chinese vehicle, with a possible crew of three, is very close in design to the Soyuz, which is much more advanced that what Gagarin flew up in.

      China is a fast rising economic and technological power. Their economy is growing three to four times as fast as the U.S. economy, their government is liberalizing, and they have nowhere to go but up.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
  53. Do They Validate? by powerlord · · Score: 1

    It'd be nice to have more countries pull up and dock with the International Space Station, but I bet when they built it they just didn't put in enough garage space. I mean, it was already over-budget, what would the point of putting in docking for twelve, when a two car garage (with one in the driveway for emergencies) would suffice?

    Of course, the important thing most ISS astronauts are probably asking themselves is:
    Do they Deliver? ;)

    --
    This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  54. Not to be arrogant by nate+nice · · Score: 1

    But it's like watching the Special Olympics. :P

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    1. Re:Not to be arrogant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's not an arrogant comment, it's a retarded comment. (no pun.. or was it a pun? i cant decide)

    2. Re:Not to be arrogant by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      Heh, yeah it is retarded. It's true though man. When it comes to science it's about what you are doing now. If you're doing something that was done by others years ago (and in modern science, 40 years is ancient) you don't have shit. With the technologies the Russians had, putting a man in space is crazy. Now days a high school student can make the calculations with the help of a calculator or computer and someone like John Carmack can build the rocket. The fact China is now doing this is a testament to how far behind they are with these things. It's propaganda at best and merits nothing worth mentioning. Oh well, go China...I'm guessing most of your citizens would rather be blast into space than live under the oppression of a draconian dictatorship that has no place in our modern world.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
  55. Final Report by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

    FINAL REPORT:

    Size
    [x] Big and REALLY empty
    [ ] Full of stars

    Green alien women:
    [ ] Yes
    [x] No

    Complete waste of time
    [x] Yes
    [ ] No

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    1. Re: Final Report by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      FINAL REPORT:

      Size
      [x] Big and REALLY empty
      [ ] Full of stars

      Green alien women:
      [ ] Yes
      [x] No

      Complete waste of time
      [x] Yes
      [ ] No
      You forgot to count how many times he gets laid in the next three months.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  56. Spaceshots more important than bringing freedom? by toupsie · · Score: 1, Informative

    Boy do I smell sour grapes. Despite your excitement of the Chinese making it into space 40 years after the Russians and the Americans, the average Chinese citizen will have less freedom than the average Iraqi. Blasting into space will not bring Chinese political prisoners out of the painful shadows of their torturers. At least the money and effort of the Americans and their coalition will bring freedom to a people. The money spent by the Chinese government is a nice PR stunt but it will do little for the common man's ability to be free in China.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  57. It's good to see... by iiioxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That courage and the American spirit of adventure is alive and well... albeit in China. In the US, we're still wringing our hands and calling for an end to manned space flight, because we lost a shuttle and seven fine astronauts - along with our backbone as a people.

    Kudos to the Chinese. It's about time we had some healthy competition in space. Let's get another Space Race started. Maybe that will get the US Congress and NASA off their collective asses and back into the game (and we might see a human on Mars inside of 10 years). Maybe we can drive a little rivalry to foster some nationalistic pride in the US again (but I doubt it).

    I know this: if the Chinese lost a capsule, they'd bow their heads in homage for a moment of silence, then get to launching another one, two weeks later. That's the kind of resolve that allows a nation to succeed. The rest of the world should take note, unless they want to be following in the footsteps of the Chinese for the remainder of the 21st century, instead of leading the way.

    1. Re:It's good to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think a man on Mars in 10 years is a little bit too ambitious. Much better would be to send unmanned expeditions, equipped with hardware that's designed to build a habitat for human life, mine for fuel for a return trip, and other such things. Once all that's been built and setup, we can start thinking about sending people over there -- at first to verify that all is in order, and doing the little things that need to be done to finish off the job; and then to set up a colony.

      Mars is the logical first extra-terrestrial colony. The moon simply doesn't have the gravity or resources for a complete colony; it'd be a good testing ground for the equipment, though, being so close to Earth. But for all of this to really start being viable, we need to move away from rockets and towards a space elevator. The tech needed for that isn't quite there... but it's close. Very, very close...

    2. Re:It's good to see... by silentbozo · · Score: 1

      I'd rather just launch a big-ass lab with a good machine shop, a crew of engineers, plenty of consumables, and enough fuel for them to get to a Lagrange point. Let them build the equipment we'll need, and have robot ships grab asteroids for materials. Humankind has to get a toe-hold outside of the gravity well for us to get anywhere. And no, orbiting in LEO (especially with only a 3 man housekeeping crew) is not good enough.

    3. Re:It's good to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US, we're still wringing our hands and calling for an end to manned space flight, because we lost a shuttle and seven fine astronauts - along with our backbone as a people.

      How did this bullshit get rated highly? WHO is wringing their hands? WHO has lost their backbone? All the national polls I've seen show the majority of Americans want our space flights to continue.

      The question is ... how will they continue. With NASA or private enterprise? If NASA, with a large budget or a small one?

      I know this: if the Chinese lost a capsule, they'd bow their heads in homage for a moment of silence, then get to launching another one, two weeks later.

      Yes, that's because the Chinese government would never let that news see the light of day. Oh, the launch was just postponed, it didn't blow up. Why do you think they cancelled all coverage of it? The only people allowed to be there were government officials and a handful of "journalists" from the STATE RUN NEWS AGENCIES.

    4. Re:It's good to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Let's get another Space Race started"?

      You may not want another, as I would say the US seriously lost the first space race. The USSR where first to orbit, first man in space, etc

      The only success the US remembers is the man-on-the moon and I think that achieved little as robots like the russian moon landers (that got to the moon first) could have done it faster, better with less risk.

      For the record, I think the deep space probes and the Viking missions have been something for NASA to be very proud of - putting people in space is just a PR exercise.

    5. Re:It's good to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mars is the logical first extra-terrestrial colony. The moon simply doesn't have the gravity or resources for a complete colony; it'd be a good testing ground for the equipment, though, being so close to Earth.

      What does gravity have to do with anything? And the moon has plenty of resources, excluding an atmosphere of course. And it would make a great staging area for a Mars mission.

      As far as space elevators go, as far as practicality goes, I'll believe in cold fusion first.

    6. Re:It's good to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? If NASA dumped its useless manned programs and spent its huge budget instead on cheap robotic probes, it could launch a dozen of them every year. What's more useful --- a billion-dollar tin can where astronauts grow plants, or Galileo and the Hubble space telescope? NASA's mission is supposed to be scientific --- how about it did a bit of science for once.

    7. Re:It's good to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... That courage and the American spirit of adventure is alive and well.

      Hey, where can I get some of this courage and spirit of adventure? Us people outside of the US have never heard if this stuff before. Is it patented, copyrighted or perhaps even GPL'ed (I hope so).

      I've also heard that you guys are cultivating arrogance and ignorance.

    8. Re:It's good to see... by EvanED · · Score: 1

      It would have been much harder to cover than you seem to think. China essentially announced the launch, and if there was no further news about it people would start to get suspicious. Saying it was just delayed may or may not be possible depending on whether other nations got surveilance photos of the then-abandoned launch pad.

    9. Re:It's good to see... by EvanED · · Score: 1

      "The only success the US remembers is the man-on-the moon and I think that achieved little as robots like the russian moon landers (that got to the moon first) could have done it faster, better with less risk."

      And putting the man on the moon was a damn good end to the race too. It doesn't matter in the marathon if the eventual winner started slow and sprinted the last bit to win, he still won.

      That said, I too think the success of Apollo is not the be-all, end-all finale as we like to think. Saying one nation "won" the space race to me seems silly. It was too unstructured to really matter. The start seems reminiscent of two brothers walking along, one running ahead to their parents car, and stating that they roundly trounced their bro in the race to the car. (Not to this extent because the US should have been looking into space more than they were, but that's the idea.) Meanwhile, the "end" of the race was set by an arbitary decree from Kennedy.

      Both sides have very significant achievements. The Soviets of course had the first of many things: first satellite, first person in space (and orbit to boot!), first spacewalk, first permanent space station (maybe... not sure; anyway, the first that was up for any length of time), etc. OTOH, the US also had firsts: first in-flight docking, first moon orbit, first moon landing, first mostly reusable spacecraft (and essentially the only ever developed; the Russians have one but it flew only one or two missions if that). The US program should also be noted for the speed at which it got up and running; after being blindsighted by Sputnik, we were only a month or two behind launching the first person (though about 6 mths behind the first orbit).

      So I think even beginning to hint that one program is somehow "better" than the other is silly.

    10. Re:It's good to see... by Sircus · · Score: 1

      Minor point - we currently have a 2 man housekeeping crew. There'll temporarily be 5 onboard ISS at the next changeover - the 2 current crew, 2 new crew and 1 ESA Astronaut there to do experiments for the time between docking of the new capsule and return to earth of the old one (with the old crew).

      --
      PenguiNet: the (shareware) Windows SSH client
    11. Re:It's good to see... by simong_oz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Kudos to the Chinese.

      Absolutely, couldn't agree more.

      Let's get another Space Race started.

      No, let's not. I know it's a pipe dream but I'd much rather see some real, proper international cooperation, and I'm sure many of the scientists working in this area would love to see this as well. With all the great minds working in this area (after all, 3 nations have individually now put humans into space) imagine what could be achieved?

      foster some nationalistic pride in the US again

      (bye bye karma ....) This is not meant as flamebait, but I can't think of any other nation on earth that has as much nationalistic pride as the US - too much nationalistic pride in fact. By all means, be patriotic (I know I am), but when you're so patriotic that you blindly assume your way is right and won't listen to anybody else, then you have a problem.

      I know this: if the Chinese lost a capsule, they'd bow their heads in homage for a moment of silence, then get to launching another one, two weeks later.

      a very appropriate response IMO - what better way to show that their lives were not lost in vain than to finish the job they loved so much (nobody can tell me that anyone would put themselves through that much selection and training with so much dedication without loving the job)?

      --
      "Because it's there." - George Mallory, when asked why he wanted to climb Mt Everest, March 18, 1923 (New York Times)
    12. Re:It's good to see... by danro · · Score: 1

      As I understand it (i might be wrong) their first taikonaut is also a rather famous fighter pilot.
      I would guess that him simply vanishing after a launch that allegedly never happened would raise some eybrows...

      --

      "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
    13. Re:It's good to see... by sql*kitten · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, let's not. I know it's a pipe dream but I'd much rather see some real, proper international cooperation, and I'm sure many of the scientists working in this area would love to see this as well. With all the great minds working in this area (after all, 3 nations have individually now put humans into space) imagine what could be achieved?

      Umm, absolutely nothing?

      It's a fact of human nature. Without competition, there is no urgency. Without that, an unlimited amount of time and money gets spent on looking for the "perfect" solution where in competition, a decision would be made because it has to be made. NOW. Even if it's not perfect, a reasonably good (or at least, not bad) decision now is infinitely superior to a perfect decision made at some unspecified time in the future. NASA itself is proof: given time and money, scientists will get nothing done. Given a hard limit on both and someone to race against, miracles occur. There is literally centuries of evidence, that competition gets stuff done, cooperation does not. It is a fundamental part of being human, that we love to compete and are motivated by worthy adversaries. Anyone who says anything different is a fool.

    14. Re:It's good to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget our Gemini program had some firsts.... First rendavouz come to mind.

    15. Re:It's good to see... by TheVampire · · Score: 1

      Umm. No, it's not good to see. It's a horrible sight, actually. It's not the "spirit of adventure" by any means. It's more like the "desire of domination".

      You see, the "space race" the communist chinese have in mind is to see how fast they can get nuclear warheads into orbit above the USA, and how fast they can get a base on the moon, also armed with nuclear weapons.

      Indeed, we should take note of this, and try with all of our resources to stop it.

    16. Re:It's good to see... by boutell · · Score: 1
      I'm down with most of this, but I should point out that the Chinese government was very cautious about launch coverage, even scrubbing any live broadcast of the launch. I don't agree that their government is any more comfortable with the idea of losing a mission than we are. The Soviets did their best to completely suppress knowledge of Bondarenko's similar O2-rich atmosphere buring death. The news of the Apollo launch pad fire did reach the press, and yet the Apollo program got "back on the horse" and went forward. I don't think Americans are really so incapable of accepting astronaut deaths. It's a bit of a red herring.

      We're simply incapable of getting interested in a winged taxi service which can only reach low earth orbit -- the "lost wrenches may rip through you at 30,000 miles per hour at any time" zone -- where robots could just as easily do the work. American astronauts should be preparing to play a role in the exploration, industrial exploitation and settlement of the Moon and Mars, not getting whacked by debris while en route to a useless space station in a dumb orbit.

      --
      Check out the Apostrophe open-source CMS: http://www.apostrophenow.com/
    17. Re:It's good to see... by Cyno · · Score: 1

      because we lost a shuttle and seven fine astronauts - along with our backbone as a people.

      That's not the first time and we lost more than that. We lost those astronauts because we've never had the right kind of culture. You know what I'm talking about. The kind of culture that goes to space because it wants to explore. The kind that protects the lives of astronauts because it loves its people. The kind that cares more about life and living it than money.

      Maybe we never had that kind of culture to begin with. But from my perspective its sad to watch us struggle to be number 1 while we prove to the world over and over again that we still don't understand what it means to love eachother.

      Money is more important, here in America, than putting a colony on Mars or the Moon, even if we have the capability. We'd rather put a Pizza Hut and Pepsi billboard up there with lots of blinky lights and flashing colors, so we can sell advertisements and get rich quick.

      That is our culture and until we're able to look at ourselves for what we really are and decide we want to change, nothing will help us. You can give NASA all the money in the world, they will still lose lives when they care more about that money than those astronauts. And what's their solution? Use robots so they don't have to worry about human life? Fine, whatever, we missed the point.

    18. Re:It's good to see... by Cyno · · Score: 1

      I'm a fool and I think the existence of Linux proves my point. Global cooperation can easily beat any competitive and innovative capitalist corporation. Cut corners, find "reasonable" solutions and outsource all you want, a perfect solution does exist and the world will find it. It doesn't cost a lot of money to observe the world around you and learn. It costs a lot of time and patience since most of us are too busy ignoring it or working.

      If we automated most of the world people have to do then we could ask more people to find these "perfect" solutions. But we're too busy being selfish and greedy to attempt to really cooperate and learn.

    19. Re:It's good to see... by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      I'm a fool and I think the existence of Linux proves my point.

      Open source is all about competition! Everyone who has said "I can implement that feature better than so-and-so" or added a feature from a commercial product to a free one, or deployed Linux in place of NT is actively competing. If you've ever seen a flamewar on LKML you'll know that cooperation is very little to do with it.

    20. Re:It's good to see... by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      You said exactly what I was thinking, and I was going to hammer it home with "Look at KDE vs. Gnome."

      Would KDE have advanced to the state it's in today, from three years ago, if Gnome hadn't appeared on the scene? Perhaps; but having competition made them both better (and freed KDE's license as well).

      We need fires lit under us to get us to perform at our best.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    21. Re:It's good to see... by iiioxx · · Score: 1

      Umm. No, it's not good to see. It's a horrible sight, actually. It's not the "spirit of adventure" by any means. It's more like the "desire of domination".

      I see it more as a "desire of relevance" than anything malevolent. I think China is trying to regain some of the prestige it held in its less-than-recent history, and forge ahead as a strong nation in the future.

      China is a country that has basically stagnated under Communist rule for the last 50 years, and I think they know that. China has been taking baby-steps towards capitalism in the last few years, and I think they are simply trying to become a marketable, technological power in the world.

      I think you're confusing China with North Korea in their motivations and temperment.

    22. Re:It's good to see... by iiioxx · · Score: 1

      >Let's get another Space Race started.

      No, let's not. I know it's a pipe dream but I'd much rather see some real, proper international cooperation, and I'm sure many of the scientists working in this area would love to see this as well. With all the great minds working in this area (after all, 3 nations have individually now put humans into space) imagine what could be achieved?


      I disagree. I firmly believe that competition and discord drives progress, not cooperation. In the end, I suspect that it will be profit motive that will drive space exploration, just as it was profit motive that drove exploration of the New World beginning in the 1500's. However, like the exploration of the New World, it falls upon scientific interests and the financial investment of governments to take the initial exploratory steps, and to absorb the risk that comes with sailing off to the edge of the known world.

      >foster some nationalistic pride in the US again

      (bye bye karma ....) This is not meant as flamebait, but I can't think of any other nation on earth that has as much nationalistic pride as the US - too much nationalistic pride in fact. By all means, be patriotic (I know I am), but when you're so patriotic that you blindly assume your way is right and won't listen to anybody else, then you have a problem.


      Once again, I disagree. You're confusing arrogance for pride. The American people as a whole are patriotic to the point of putting a flag sticker on their bumper, and that's about it. For the most part, Americans are self-absorbed, pampered individuals who care little beyond keeping their SUV filled with fuel, and their cup filled with $8 coffee (and I am an American, so I say this not with glee, but with utter disappointment). The vast majority of Americans aren't interested in making their country a great place to live. They're only interested in making their own lives as comfortable as possible, and only raise an interest beyond that narrow focus when it comes to protecting the status quo.

      In 1961, John F. Kennedy challenged the nation with, "Ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your country." Today, that sentiment would either be met with open derision, or (more likely) a collective shrug. America has gotten used to being on top of the heap and standing unchallenged, and this has made us soft and complacent. We have begun to take power and prestige for granted.

      My only hope is that fear or ego in the face of China's triumph, will drive America to retake it's position, not as a world *power*, but as a world *leader*.

    23. Re:It's good to see... by Cyno · · Score: 1

      I like your perspective. Its a good one! :)

    24. Re:It's good to see... by pavon · · Score: 1

      I hole heartedly agree with you on this. But I would make one modification.
      Given a hard limit on both and someone to race against, miracles occur.
      I would say that a hard limit on time is the important factor. A hard limit on money is part of the problem with the current NASA situation - because they have little money to work with they become even more concerned with comming up with the best solution, because they don't have many oportunites to fly. This wastes time and in the long-run money, because you don't have the rapid feedback cycle. Although, I do agree that with some up front investment we could develop a cheaper solution than we have now.

      Or as the old adage goes
      Fast, Cheap, Good: choose two
      I the space race we had Fast and Good.
      Now that Cheap is mandated we have Slow and Good.

    25. Re:It's good to see... by TheVampire · · Score: 1

      "I think you're confusing China with North Korea in their motivations and temperment."

      No, North Korea is just China's tool. Once China is ready to invade Taiwan, they'll sick NK on SK to pin down the USA, so that we will not have the resources needed to help Taiwan. ( Not that our sorry ass kissing politicians would do anything anyway. After all, China invaded and occupied Tibet and we've done nothing about that. )

      Their motivations are far worse than the NK's...

  58. Re:First post? by blixel · · Score: 1

    I guess this would be what they call a first post!

    And that negative moderation is what "they" call karma burn.

  59. this is "a good thing" by jeff+munkyfaces · · Score: 1
    i for one can't wait for china (and any other nations seperate from the USA) to get going with space exploration.

    hopefully they will encourage development on either side as we experienced with the first space race - a little rivalry never hurt anyone.

    Personally, and i am aware this may sound a little paranoid, but the sooner we establish independant off-earth colonies the better, and i think we are more likely to push this if someone else is trying to do the same thing.

  60. Re:Spaceshots more important than bringing freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't know that having another country occupying your own was freedom.

    Now, to stay on topic... Being from a country that's not a global superpower, I was very impressed when I visited China last winter. China is no longer hardcore communist, and it's really amazing what they've come to accomplish in recent years. I wouldn't be surprised if it dethrones one of the current G8 countries. Congratulations to China.

  61. That's not true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    racial slurs about black americans get modded down into oblivion and racial slurs about anyone else get modded to the stars.

    Not true. Racial slurs about Jews are also modded down into oblivion.

    1. Re:That's not true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, any negative comment about Israel is automatically accused of being a racist comment against the Jews.

    2. Re:That's not true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just like in the real world. damn mudslinging jews.

  62. Re:Spaceshots more important than bringing freedom by toupsie · · Score: 1

    It is if the previous person that was occupying your country thought it was fun to put people feet first into plastic shredders because you publicly disagreed with their political views. People in China today are being throw in jail or re-education camps because they disagree with the current political structure. To me that is pretty hard core communist.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  63. 1961.... by batkins · · Score: 1

    1961 called....they want their news back.

  64. Congrats China... next up is India by Samir+Gupta · · Score: 1

    I congratulate the Chinese, and I place high hopes that my homeland of India will soon follow in their footsteps!

    Let's get some more players in the space game. Maybe someday the USA will outsource their routine non-military space operations to India or China, like they do with their programming, manufacturing, etc!

    --
    -- Samir Gupta, Ph. D. Head, New Technology Research Group, Nintendo Co. Ltd., Kyoto, Japan.
    1. Re:Congrats China... next up is India by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      my homeland of India will soon follow in their footsteps!

      If you eat a Vindaloo in space... Can anyone hear you scream?

      OT: I just had Indian food for the very first time last week. And I absolutely loved it!

    2. Re:Congrats China... next up is India by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

      I hope those two countries put aside their difference and become friends. Can you imagine the R&D power if India and China joined up??? New Asian hegemony! :-)

      --
      EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    3. Re:Congrats China... next up is India by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Let's get some more players in the space game. Maybe someday the USA will outsource their routine non-military space operations to India or China, like they do with their programming, manufacturing, etc!

      I'm all for it -- as long as we've moved on to The Next Big Thing (whatever that will be) before then.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    4. Re:Congrats China... next up is India by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      The Chandrayaan-1 mission to the Moon will be unmanned, but will be with international collaboration. Canada, apparently, wants to send in a couple of instruments along with ours when we reach the Moon in 2008.

    5. Re:Congrats China... next up is India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vindaloo is English not India you twit.

      Vindaloo means "Shit we would not eat".

    6. Re:Congrats China... next up is India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks AC person!

  65. "All your base by EduardoFonseca · · Score: 1

    ... are belong to us" - Chinese Space Program

  66. Does this mean we get a Chinese on Star Trek now? by mayns · · Score: 0, Troll

    Think about it. China is the most populous country in the world. They've got an active space program. But on star trek we get a couple of japanese and a korean. And what about India? That's 1/3 of the world population between the two of them and neither has had representation on a series about the harmonious earth of the future. Stupid Americans.

  67. Okay, so in summary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Slashdot racism acceptability index, 2003

    Actively Discouraged racism (will be modded way down)

    • Blacks
    • Jews
    • Africans (Unless they are Muslim or look like they could be Indians)
    Actively Encouraged racism (will be modded way up)
    • Indians
    • Chinese
    • The French
    • Anyone an american would find visually indistinguishable from an Indian or a Chinese person, Japan excluded (Koreans, Indonesians, etc)
    • Canadians
    • Americans
    • Michael Jackson
    Controversial Racism (Will recieve large, but equal, amounts of both positive and negative moderation)
    • "Arabs"
    Neutral racism (anything could happen; will probably remain unmodded)
    • Anyone not in any of the above categories
    -- Super Ugly Ultraman
    1. Re:Okay, so in summary? by jea6 · · Score: 1

      You missed: Homosexual (Actively Discouraged)

      --

      sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
    2. Re:Okay, so in summary? by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      I had to dig back into the low mod comments you were replying to to determine that your comment wasn't about homosexuality being actively discouraged in China.

      Oh well.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
  68. one of those times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you wish you had mod points :)

  69. If only we could launch all the Trolls into space. by The+Famous+Druid · · Score: 1

    Thank you for raising my own somewhat battered self-esteem several notches.

    --
    Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum videtur (anything said in Latin sounds important)
  70. Will China be the first to Mars? by KingReuben · · Score: 1
    Rather fun thought -- China secretly planning to beat the USA to the
    • Red
    Planet

    The PRC is a very insecure state when it comes to international affairs, and also very capable when it comes to R&D. The USA is just not putting much effort or money into Mars. ... Well, anyway, who knows, a fun thought..

    --


    --
    om Shanti
  71. funny coincidence by gacp · · Score: 1

    Isn't it a funny coincidence that China gains manned access to space the same year the USA loses it? Looks like one of those 'turning points' historians love to write about. Maybe they will.

    --
    ``L'imagination au povoir.''
    1. Re:funny coincidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I, for one, welcome our new Chinese Space Emperor overlords

    2. Re:funny coincidence by red+floyd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Life imitates art...

      In Stephen Baxter's Titan, the Chinese launch their first manned ship around the same time as Columbia is destroyed upon re-entry!

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    3. Re:funny coincidence by weileong · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure this is entirely accurate... .

      I think we're all forgetting one thing - the X-prize. The Chinese space program is a government program in all sense of the word - just as the Russian/Soviet, US ones as well. In that respect they are all the same. The EU setup is supra-national but still governmental, and likewise the Brazilian attempts (and whoever else). However it is only in the US that there seems to be any action in attempting to get private individuals up into space (assuming thigns don't get messed up, e.g. your government passes a law that makes space exploration only legal for NASA).

      I think this is going to be far more significant (assuming it pans out - and I expect it will!) than any number of government-run space explorations. I can't envision any Soviet or Chinese non-government enterprises springing up to launch space vehicles anytime soon.

    4. Re:funny coincidence by TehHustler · · Score: 1

      Well, there's not just US entrants in the X-Prize... Unless you're saying the US entrants are making better progress, which is probably true.

      --

      TheHustler
      http://www.elmarko.org/ - Useless bilge
      http://www.asylum-games.co.uk/ - Co-Founder
  72. I would like to be the first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to welcome China to the 60's.

    1. Re:I would like to be the first... by sniggly · · Score: 1
      China has been taking jobs from manufacturing and now from R&D and IT. They're on a fast track program to seriously compete in space. They don't have democratic controls and thick headed senators undermining their space program, they don't have any serious labour protection laws, nothing in their way yet and for the next few decades to stop them. And they do have the drive and funding. Funding a great part of which is coming from us.

      Listen to yourself, "welcome china to the '60's." And then you wake up and notice how Goldman Sachs predicts China to overtake the US economically in 2039 "Within four years China will have overtaken Germany; Japan by 2015 and crossed the US by 2039 to become the world's largest economy ( All in U.S dollar terms)"

      http://www.business-standard.com/today/story.asp?M enu=26&story=25146
      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?grid=M 3&menuId=242&menuItemId=2825&xml=%2Fmoney%2F2003%2 F10%2F12%2Fccecag12.xml

      --
      Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
    2. Re:I would like to be the first... by BigDumbAnimal · · Score: 1

      Parent's joke stolen from SNL.

    3. Re:I would like to be the first... by -brazil- · · Score: 2, Informative
      And then you wake up and notice how Goldman Sachs predicts China to overtake the US economically in 2039 "Within four years China will have overtaken Germany; Japan by 2015 and crossed the US by 2039 to become the world's largest economy ( All in U.S dollar terms)"


      Don't forget that China has 5 times the USA's population, 10 times Japan's and 16 times that of Germany. It's not at all surprising or threatening that their GDP would be bigger. However, that huge population won't be content with the lack of democratic controls or labour protection laws forever...

      --

      The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
      --Henry Kissinger

  73. Spirit of adventure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the American spirit of adventure is alive and well...

    Oh, put down your flag for a moment and consider that Europeans were the ones to venture out into the unknown, risking it all, to conquer America in the first place. That was only a few hundred years ago(seeding the "American" perspective on adventure, no doubt), and Europeans have continued to be great adventurers.

    Take pure "adventure" spirit, not connected to commerce for a moment... A Brit and a Tibetan were the first to conquer the world's tallest mountain. Where were the Americans?

    Brits and Norwegians were the first to race to reach the south pole. Where were the Americans? This was adventure, at all costs, at its finest.

    I'm not denying Americans some credit for adventure, but Europeans have historically (last few hundred years) known their adventure at least as well as Americans have historically.

    Besides, Americans participated in the first space race, not alone (which I'd unconditionally call "adventurous" then), but when pitted against a foe. And let's face it: Russia was only steps behind America for much of that race.

    Capitalism, competition, and ego are areas that I'd bow to American superiority. But not pure adventure.

    1. Re:Spirit of adventure? by EvanED · · Score: 3, Informative

      On the other hand, the US is not even 250 years old, whereas England has called itself that since I think no later than the 11th century, France the 1200s IIRC, and I'm not sure about Spain or Portugal or the other big exploration countries.

      "And let's face it: Russia was only steps behind America for much of that race."

      Russia was ahead for the first half or so; they were first to launch a satellite, the first to launch a man*, the first to orbit a person (which was for them wrapped up in the first manned flight, while for us it took until our third launch), and the first to perform an EVA. The first thing we were first at so to speak was inflight rendezvous, and that wasn't until Gemini 12. The first time we put ourselves clearly in the lead was Christmas 1968 with the flight of Apollo 8.

      *They were also the first to orbit a woman (maybe 1967? The late 60s come to mind), however as this is not a technological achievement I left it out.

    2. Re:Spirit of adventure? by Marlor · · Score: 1

      Take pure "adventure" spirit, not connected to commerce for a moment... A Brit and a Tibetan were the first to conquer the world's tallest mountain. Where were the Americans?

      Probably at home like the Brits, when Sir Edmund Hillary, a New Zealander climbed Everest with Tenzin Norgay, his Tibetan Sherpa guide.

      Brits and Norwegians were the first to race to reach the south pole. Where were the Americans? This was adventure, at all costs, at its finest.

      Yes, Roald Engelbregt Gravning Amundsen was the first person to reach the South Pole (beating Robert Falcon Scott by a month), but the American adventurer, Robert E. Peary, was the first person to reach the Arctic pole in April 1909 - two years earlier.

    3. Re:Spirit of adventure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Tenzig is Nepalese.

    4. Re:Spirit of adventure? by glgraca · · Score: 1

      The russians have the Kuznetzov rockets, that
      the americans didn't even think were possible
      and that they now import from russia.

      So maybe the US's lead was not so clear.

      I also have the impression that the russians
      were better at the science, whereas the americans
      had (have) a more trial-and-error approach. But
      that might just be an impression...

    5. Re:Spirit of adventure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And China was already an empire before Good old JC was even born.

    6. Re:Spirit of adventure? by mubar · · Score: 1

      They were also the first to orbit a woman (maybe 1967? The late 60s come to mind)...

      1963. Russian Valentina Tereshkova was the first woman in space. Unfortunately it took 19 years until the second, Svetlana Savitskaya started it again.

    7. Re:Spirit of adventure? by VikingBerserker · · Score: 1

      *They were also the first to orbit a woman (maybe 1967? The late 60s come to mind), however as this is not a technological achievement I left it out.

      This is no great achievement - I orbit women on a regular basis. Unfortunately, that's because they won't let me land on them.

    8. Re:Spirit of adventure? by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      First to orbit a woman? Cassanova and Don Juan have the beat by cenuries and millenia dude.

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
    9. Re:Spirit of adventure? by EvanED · · Score: 1

      However, all manned launches have been on designs of ours, or at least von Braun who you may or may not count. Mercury used the Redstone and Atlas rockets, Gemini the Titan, Apollo the Saturn, and the Shuttle on the Shuttle's system. All of these are our designs from everything I've hard.

      I'm not saying that we don't use Kuznetzov rockets for missiles or whatnot, but nothing we've used to put people into space has been imported. (That's not strictly true; parts of the Shuttle system are imported, but almost all the assembly and most of the parts are domestically done.)

    10. Re:Spirit of adventure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first thing we were first at so to speak was inflight rendezvous, and that wasn't until Gemini 12

      PLEASE!

      If you're going to post a comment, at least know what you're talking about.

      Gemini 6 flew the first manned rendevous mission, using Gemini 7 as its target, on December 15-16, 1965. The mission was commanded by Walter M. Schirra and Thomas P. Stafford. The first *docking* was Gemini 8 on March 16, 1966. BTW, Gemini 12 was the *LAST* mission in Project Gemini.

      "A pipe gives a wise man time to think and a fool something to stick in his mouth"

  74. Not far to catch up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the US will admit that they have been dragging their heals in since the first Space Shuttles. That, the technology of today, and the massive resources of the Chinese (and they don't need as big a budget for an equivalent program) mean that they are not as far behing the US as some may believe.

    I once read that the biggest problem the US had with Communism was that it provided a framework for modernization within a generation. Given that very few outside the US believe anymore that they (the US) give a crap about human rights, and the relatively rapid rise of China as a world power (economically, technologically, militarily),I wonder how much of that is true.

    1. Re:Not far to catch up by praksys · · Score: 1

      I once read that the biggest problem the US had with Communism was that it provided a framework for modernization within a generation. Given that very few outside the US believe anymore that they (the US) give a crap about human rights, and the relatively rapid rise of China as a world power (economically, technologically, militarily),I wonder how much of that is true.

      China was economically stagnant until the communist party abandoned pure communism and adopted capitalism in some of the costal regions of the country. In the interior, where the economic system is still largely communist the population is barely better off than it was in the 19th century.

      You don't need any conspiracy theories to explain why the US opposed communism. The real problems that the US had with communism are quite easy to identify:

      (1) Communists tend to commit mass murder whenever they get the chance (in the case of China the various purges and mass starvation campaigns killed off between 45 and 103 million people - i.e. roughly 3 to 7 times the number that died in the holocaust).

      (2) Communists tend to persecute the religious (that's about 90% of the population in the US).

      (3) Communists have at various times threatened to destroy the United States, and have actually destroyed a number of other democracies (most of them have of course revived after the collapse of Communism).

      Communism provides a framework for killing a lot of people and constructing an industrialized economy that does not work. That is not "modernization", it is a sad parody of modernization.

    2. Re:Not far to catch up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid there are two completely disinct levels here : first, is a country capitalist, theocratic, communist, socialist,... and second, is the country dedicated to Human Rights and democracy.

      The problem the United States of America had with communism had nothing to do with massacres or democracy (else, the USA should have deposited Hitler in 1935, behaved quite differently in Viet-Nam, and have had a quite different foreign policy toward South America, for instance).

      The part where you mention the antogonism of some religious communities toward Communism is probably more revelant; adding the interest of capitalist corporations any you've got it, mostly. Don't forget, though, that in a country like the USA, "capitalist corporation" can involve most part of the population, since lots of people do believe in capitalist model.

    3. Re:Not far to catch up by praksys · · Score: 1
      The problem the United States of America had with communism had nothing to do with massacres or democracy (else, the USA should have deposited Hitler in 1935...

      Why? The holocaust did not get under way until quite a bit later. It only became obvious after the US had already joined the war. In fact the USSR, pre-WWII, would have been a better example because even in the 1930's Stallin had already managed to murder millions. Of course few people outside of the USSR knew about it because too many of the people who should have told the rest of the world (i.e. journalists who witnessed the events) were communist sympathizers.

      ...behaved quite differently in Viet-Nam...

      I don't follow this either. The North Vietnamese carried out mass murders in the just like every other communist regime. When they did capture cities in the south (like Hue) they did the same thing there. The US intervened in Vietnam in part to check those sorts of mass killings.

      ...and have had a quite different foreign policy toward South America, for instance...

      In South America the US backed regimes that were, in some cases, responsible for killing thousands or perhaps even tens of thousands. That is quite a bit better than the millions who would have been killed by the communists if they had gained control of those countries.

      I should also point out that all of the countries where the US got the dictator they wanted are now democracies. Many of the places where they failed to halt the advance of communism are still communist. Chile, for example, is free and prosperous. Cuba is still enslaved, and Castro is still imprisoning and murdering people.

    4. Re:Not far to catch up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China was economically stagnant until the communist party abandoned pure communism and adopted capitalism in some of the costal regions of the country. In the interior, where the economic system is still largely communist the population is barely better off than it was in the 19th century.

      Communism is a political system. Capatalism is an economic system. I would say the Chinese are the first successful communist state to adopt capatilist economics (to their benefit). So the point that communism represents a model for modernization within a decade remains.

      (1) Communists tend to commit mass murder whenever they get the chance (in the case of China the various purges and mass starvation campaigns killed off between 45 and 103 million people - i.e. roughly 3 to 7 times the number that died in the holocaust).

      Again, not much of the world outside America believe it is concerned about human rights (numerous example such as CIA death squads and illegal wars). For a notoriously inward looking country, it is surprising just how quickly you are letting you rights be taken away from you.

      (2) Communists tend to persecute the religious (that's about 90% of the population in the US).

      As if the US would give a toss. History shows that the only time the US give a crap about what is happening to another country is when there are dollars to be made or protected.

      (3) Communists have at various times threatened to destroy the United States, and have actually destroyed a number of other democracies (most of them have of course revived after the collapse of Communism).

      And vice versa. It's all bad.

      Communism provides a framework for killing a lot of people and constructing an industrialized economy that does not work. That is not "modernization", it is a sad parody of modernization.

      The military provide a framework for killing a lot of people. The US has the biggest, and most active.

    5. Re:Not far to catch up by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      illegal wars - No war is illegal while it is in the first or second person such as 'our war' or 'your war'. It is only the third person, 'their war' that it becomes an illegal one.

      "History shows that the only time the US give a crap about what is happening to another country is when there are dollars to be made or protected."
      Sure we made a lot of cash saving Kosovo, and putting troops in somalia.

      "It's all bad."
      When our democracy has purges, we blacklist a couple hundred suspected communists. When communism has purges, millions of people die. Stalin is responsible for the deaths of between 50-80 million russians, his own people. He thought the officer corp was going to try to overthrow him so in the early 30's had 3/4 of them either executed or sent to siberia. By stalin rules, you could and many did get shot or sent to siberia for such simple crimes as picking one grain of wheat off a wheat plant and eating it becuase you where starving. If you think you can compare the mass butchery of the communists, especially Mao and Stalin, to the corrupt politicains of america you either knwo nothing about history or don't knwo what bad really is.

      "The military provide a framework for killing a lot of people. The US has the biggest, and most active."
      Last time I checked our miltary didn't try to kill civilians. Communism provides a framework for an agressive military that not only can but by definite will be forced to kill a lot of people. When people demonstrate, what do we do? We sent in police in riot gar with rubber bullets. When people demonstrate, what do the chinese do? Send in tanks with very real and deadly bullets and with no fear of using them on their own people. How many conutries did we invade during the cold war? There was the bay of pigs fiasco where we sent in others and didnt back them up. Cn't think of any others... Vietnam was started by north vietnam. We didn't invade vietnam, the north invaded and the south requested our help. We didn't invade north korea initially, they invaded the south and almost wiped it off the map. Afganistan? Invaded by the russians. Hungary and Poland? Invaded by the russians during ww2 and never let go. Who started the berlin crisis? I seem to remember it wa stalin who barricaded the city to starve it out. The cuban missle crisis? I seem to remember it was the russians putting icbms in cuba that it.

      For the olympics, china bulldozed a bunch of peoples house and gave them zero compensation. They got a notice one day to leave and the next they came with bulldozers and flattened the place. At leats we pay the people we kick out of places. Activists who were at tianemon (sic?) square are still being held in prisons around china (the ones who haven't been shot) all for speaking out against their leaders. Every other week, china makes a hint of a move against its neighbor taiwan. I don't remembering the chinese sending toops on any peace keeping missions either. Where were they in kosovo? Somalia?

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
  75. I wonder by jmcharry · · Score: 1

    whether he has to go back to jail now.

  76. Yeah China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Show the stupid west what the East is made of!
    Congrats and Good Luck in future plans

  77. And we're any better? by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

    Seriously, we're the home of McDonalds, whose goal is to cram cheap process foods down the throats of each of the 6 billion on the planet.

    Every mid-to-mega power nation inwardly hopes to trounce the world.

    --
    "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
  78. 60's comments are silly... by Comatose51 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Welcome to the 60's", etc. comments are simply pointless. First, I hate to break this to some of you, but our rockets haven't advanced all that much since Saturn V. The shuttle is still decades old and we have yet to start on a replacement. China doesn't have to catch up to the 21st century to level with us, all they have to do is get up to the 80's technology, which with their immense pool of college graduates, this won't actually take 20 years.

    Next, keep making those comments if it makes you feel better, but what are other nations supposed to do? Throw their hands up into the air and just simply accept the American lead and say "The Americans and Russians already beat us to it, what's the point of even trying?" God forbid the underdog from daring to dream big... How about doing something more useful like trying to advance our own technology? Maybe it's time to replace the shuttle with some 21st century technology and puts some gap between us and the Chinese?

    Lastly, who really cares where the technology and the help came from? Does China care now that they know how to do it? Let's face it, technology has always been built on top of the works of others. Let's not forget who were the first people to use gun powder and create rockets. China is going to built on top of the new knowledge and keep advancing.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  79. A terrible thought by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    Some country (not China) decides to invest in a "Space Program" shows a bunch of people dressed in astronaut suits. Shows film of people loading into rockets. And then fires their giant "Space missile", purposely fails it and causes it to crash and explode in some neighboring country killing thousands of people. I just hope Israel and/or Palestine doesn't decide to invest in a "Space Program" any time soon.

    1. Re:A terrible thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The odds the Palestinians start a space program in their present situation are extremelly small indeed, are they not ?

  80. Re:Just received this email from a source in China by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


    > Space flight 4-U !!! 2-DAY Acting now to get chance to go with space flight !

    Someone hacked my Web site to say "Orbited by Chinese!"

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  81. Re:Spaceshots more important than bringing freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hard core communist
    Bullshit. granted it is a dictatorial regime, they are not communist anymore.

  82. Re:Does this mean we get a Chinese on Star Trek no by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

    I've always justified it by thinking that perhaps between now and then, China and India annihilate each other in some nuclear holocaust, which most of the non-Asians (especially the Europeans) survive intact. I get the feeling that Asians make up most of the world population. If you look at the most populous conuntries in the world, most of them are Asian. Indonesia is pretty big, as well as Japan. Then again, you have to think, how did Paris end up the capital of the Federation...

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  83. Takionaut: greek word in roman letters?? by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    Should it be perhaps
    quid res Latinae
    (what thing of latin)
    rather than
    quid quid latine ?
    Been a while since I took that language.

    On a different topic, Why are they called takionauts? That is, is that what they are called in chinese? are the chinese making up greek words in roman letters?

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Takionaut: greek word in roman letters?? by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      there is a better word in chinese which i wont butcher here.. but in english it means "universe travelers" the taikonaughts term is as far as know not a chinese creation... i may be wrong on that though

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    2. Re:Takionaut: greek word in roman letters?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are cosmonauts called cosmonauts? Is that also an american creation?

    3. Re:Takionaut: greek word in roman letters?? by Ella+the+Cat · · Score: 1

      US astronauts, USSR cosmonauts, Chinese taikonauts. Each is an "I did it my way" statement. Who will be next I wonder?

    4. Re:Takionaut: greek word in roman letters?? by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      According to an old Wired issue, India and Pakistan are in fierce competition and may turn to their own little space race.

      So it'll be Hindunauts or Camelnauts. Or something.

      *ducks*

    5. Re:Takionaut: greek word in roman letters?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chinese word is Yuhangyuan. "Taikonaut" was made up by the Western media, from putting the Chinese for "Space" in front of "naut".

    6. Re:Takionaut: greek word in roman letters?? by Twillight+Leaves · · Score: 1

      Tai Kong is Space in chinese
      people who go to space are Tai Kong Ren

    7. Re:Takionaut: greek word in roman letters?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it'll be Hindunauts or Camelnauts. Or something.

      Camelnuts? Ew! I so do not want to see live coverage of that one.

    8. Re:Takionaut: greek word in roman letters?? by spakka · · Score: 1
      According to an old Wired issue, India and Pakistan are in fierce competition and may turn to their own little space race.

      Can't they just hijack one?

    9. Re:Takionaut: greek word in roman letters?? by sketerpot · · Score: 1

      That would be rather difficult; the security has got to be ridiculously tight. However, they could try finding a likely X-Prize team or two and funding them. Sure, the government help would disqualify the team for the X-Prize, but they'd get to latch on to a small space program with minimal investment.

  84. A.C. Clarke saw this coming by Uncle+Barnard's+Star · · Score: 1

    In 2010: Odyssey Two, Arthur C. Clarke saw the Chinese as being the third country to send a piloted mission to Jupiter, and becoming the second to reach it (after the Americans because of the psychotic HAL botched their date with the Monolith). The Chinese, in a mission cloaked as an attempt to build a space station, manages to outrace the joint Russian and American mission to Jupiter. Clarke didn't forsee the end of the Cold War, but he was years ahead of everybody (except perhaps for the Chinese themselves) in predicting China's great leap upward.

    1. Re:A.C. Clarke saw this coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      years ahead of everybody (except perhaps for the Chinese themselves) in predicting China's great leap upward

      This is a work of fiction man. He wasn't "years ahead of anything". He was writing a story, not predicting the future.

    2. Re:A.C. Clarke saw this coming by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      But when the work of fiction very closely resembles the future, then it is quite something--especially in sci-fi where anything is possible.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    3. Re:A.C. Clarke saw this coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China was widely recognized as the #3 superpower at the time, so it's not like Arthur C Clark made a genius prediciton or anything.

      If anything, he was fool for thinking the politically-motivated Space Race would last longer than a few years.

  85. I hope by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2

    I hope this starts the begginings of another space race. With our (America's) woefully old technology, hopefully the Chinese will catch up soon and force us to start really innovating again.

    Yes, there are valid reasons why America has been so lax in the development of space travel. Mostly the fact that we can't seem to justify the expense in light of the profound economic problems in our country.

    Of course, there is the opinion...my opinion...that in the long run, mankind's advancement in space is far more important then short term economic woes. And if it takes one of our (America's) uneasy neighbors to start making us nervous for us to get back on the ball in full ernest, then it's a good thing.

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
    1. Re:I hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you say "catch up soon", I think you miss the point that at the moment the Chinese _can_ put a human into space, whereas the US has the expensive, aging, unsafe Shuttle fleet grounded so that the US has to rely on the Russian to keep the ISS in orbit.

      Perhaps if the US wasn't spending billions on killing Iraqis and/or tax cuts for the rich, the US might have a functional space program?

    2. Re:I hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should we spend money on a space program when we have countries to blow up and rebuild so that our leaders can get paid by the companies that rebuild them?

      Why don't we just save a lot of death and destruction and just hand all of our money over to our elected officials' personal bank accounts?

  86. Re:Does this mean we get a Chinese on Star Trek no by shione · · Score: 1

    There's alredy been a chinese on Star Trek. I say this in past tense since Voyager got axed. Garett Wang (Harry Kim, Comms Officer) is of Chinese descent.

  87. I will give a +1 funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To the first person able to reply to this post with a complete, good-quality "China: A Rediculous Liberal Myth" post.

    1. Re:I will give a +1 funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Correct spelling on the web: A RIdiculous Liberal Myth"

  88. China on the ISS by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

    Think they'll get an invitation to help on the ISS? I mean it is developing slower than expect and China has the resources. Maybe there's some issue with sharing space station technology with China but I don't see how that could be a national security issue.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    1. Re:China on the ISS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahaha, China space budget is so small that a capsule for the ISS probably consume all the finance for the next 5 years.

  89. Re:Does this mean we get a Chinese on Star Trek no by mayns · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but his character wasn't. He played a Korean.

  90. GPL by zxm · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How about if Chinese applied GPL to her space technology ? In the IT industry, if your rivals are too powerful, you should make your products open source, then perhaps you will survive them longer. I think that the GPL is just the same as "The People's War" invented by Chair Mao.

    --
    -- forgive me my poor Engl...
  91. Re:First post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how big the tip that the Chinese TakeoutNaut will get for covering such a large distance? But the dim sims made from tortured dog meat would be cold :-(

  92. Ahem! by Tokerat · · Score: 1


    It's "Taikonaut", you insensitive clod!

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  93. (S:0,OT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (S:0,OT)

  94. I just have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to take a line from Maddox and say to the Chinese:

    "Congratulations, You're mediocre!"

  95. Which is the point where I ask: by mcc · · Score: 1

    What on earth happened to the Space Exploration Act of 2003? That was the most exciting piece of news I've heard this year, and I haven't heard a word about it since it was introduced. What happened to it? Did it quietly drift into oblivion? Did it stall in committee? Is it dead yet, is it ever going to get to a vote?

    HR 3057 was a coherent, realistic, and bold plan to revamp America's space program by setting it on an actual schedule with goals, and taking its focus away from "get into space and then come back" and toward doing actual interesting, forward-looking, long-term things, like developing intraorbital craft, setting up construction sites at Lagrange points, setting up research centers on celestial bodies, etc. It was well-designed, had provisions to ensure the schedule was stuck to, and could work. Where did it go?

    Does anyone know what a good place is to check up on the status of introduced bills, since the general media seems to think the actual functioning of our government so hideously boring as to be beneath mention ever?

    1. Re: Which is the point where I ask: by bezuwork's+friend · · Score: 1
      From Thomas (Library of Congress), here is the status of HR 3057.

      Here is the homepage of Thomas, for future reference.

  96. No, they just bought it from everyone else by theycallmeB · · Score: 1

    As a number of commentators have noted, the Chinese Shenzhou capsules are very similar to the Russian Soyuz. Perhaps just coincidence, but China does take in a lot of foreign, hard currency that the Russians would dearly love to have.

    While there is no smoking gun that they did buy the capsule design, it is positively known that China's Long March series rockets received (illegally) several key guidance technologies from US aerospace firms (I think it was Boeing and Hughes, but I may be wrong). At the time (mid-90s) there was massive demand commercial satellite launches, but all Western launch sites were booked for years and then-current Chinese failed so often as to be un-insurable. A few illegal technology transfers, and the reliability of Long March rockets soared, as did the order books of satellite builders. The offending companies still do business with the DoD, and never even had a thorough management as a result of this. Go figure.

    As for exploring space, Japan, France and Brazil all have demonstrated successful space launch capabilities, they simply haven't bothered to strap a sack of flesh to the top of one of their rockets.

  97. Look at us, we are shortsighted space dorks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CONGRADS CHINA! We will ignore the fact that you are a repressive communist regime. We don't care that you starve people, and your citizens live in third world conditions while your leaders are like kings. For we are slashdorks, we love commies, and nothing matters except GETTING MORE PEOPLE INTO SPACE! Even if there are less people to do it! OH YEAH AND LINUX AND MAC RULE WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

  98. Re:First post? by JCCyC · · Score: 1

    First Post belongs to Yuri Gagarin.

  99. Beyond moon and Iraq reconstruction by zanderredux · · Score: 1
    While the US is entertained with the daunting task of nation-building, the Chinese might develop the WARP ENGINE in the meantime!

    Talk about budget allocation!

  100. Funny story... by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

    ... that Wang told a recent SF convention.

    Near the end of Voyager's run he called up one of the "killer Bs" (Berman or Braga, the executive producers of the show) and asked when a Chinese character would be portrayed on a Trek series. As the parent post noted, there hasn't been a notable Chinese character on the series yet.

    B's reply was something like "what do you mean, you've been playing one for the last six years!"

    Well, that explained why the writers had Harry Kim spouting Chinese parables on the show for all those years! As you noted, Kim is of course a Korean surname.

  101. Um... yeah... by devphil · · Score: 3, Interesting


    That's putting it mildly. Our "captains of industry" don't think any farther ahead than four or five months. Our politicians don't think any farther ahead than the next election.

    (Some of the other posts remind me of the Onion's sideline caption: 6,000-Year-Old Culture Now Considered a "Developing Nation".)

    All the researched, published, well-documented reports about modern China -- i.e., ones in bookstores, not slashdot; actual books, not single web pages and sound bites -- point to plans stretching over the next ten to fifty years, not just for space, but for China in general. They realize that almost none of the plans will come to fruition in their lifetimes, but that's okay, their descendants will put the finishing touches on and see it happen. We in the U.S. wouldn't dream of investing in something that won't benefit the same people investing in it.

    Analogy: In the minutes that China's rockets take to slowly lift off the ground, America is racing the quarter-mile in top-fuel hotrods and claiming they rule the world... while China's rocket gains momentum... and keeps gaining momemtum... and eventually covers distances the little modded hotrod can't even dream of. Yes, they're in for the very long haul.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:Um... yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We in the U.S. wouldn't dream of investing in something that won't benefit the same people investing in it."

      You mean like Social Security?

    2. Re:Um... yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We still have Social Security?

    3. Re:Um... yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We still have Social Security?

      Yes, and we can have it fifty years from now if we kill all boomers.

    4. Re:Um... yeah... by sql*kitten · · Score: 3, Informative

      They realize that almost none of the plans will come to fruition in their lifetimes, but that's okay, their descendants will put the finishing touches on and see it happen.

      Chinese long-term thinking goes both ways tho'. Let me tell you a story. In 1405, the Ming emperors were well on their way to establishing naval (and hence trading) dominance in the coastal Pacific. Under the command of Admiral Cheng Ho, a Chinese fleet of 250 vessels and 28,000 men explored as far as the Persian Gulf and Ehiopia. Let me put those numbers into perspective: 600 years ago the Chinese were deploying vessels of 180M in length, that is 30M shorter than the present-day British Royal Navy's flagship. Cheng's ships were big enough that for extended voyages, they could grow food on their decks! With that sort of technological superiority, the Chinese should have established a hegemony that would have persisted today.

      But in 1433, the new Ming emperor and his bureaucrats grew afraid of the rapidly expanding merchant class, who were growing wealthy through international trade, and began to pass laws to limit economic growth, to keep political power firmly in the hands of the Dynasty. By 1500 it was a capital offense to own or construct a vessel with more than 2 masts.

      In 1498, European explorer Vasco da Gama, in a single show, had managed to navigate to the Indian ocean. By Cheng Ho's standards, da Gama's ship was puny and his crew mere amateurs. Da Gama should have been patted on the head by vastly superior Chinese sailors and traders and sent back home. Only, there was no Chinese fleet anymore; the Mings had ordered it broken up. By 1502, Portugal in particular and Europe in general had asserted military superiority in the Indian Ocean and China had begun to turn inwards.

      Now, 600 years later, a European colony is the world's dominant economic, technological and military power, Europe itself is still incredibly rich and powerful by historic standards, and China is only starting to recover from a decision made by a weak Emperor in 1433. I predict that history will repeat itself, as soon as a new Cheng Ho leads the exploration of space, the Chinese political establishment will turn on him. That's how it works in China.

    5. Re:Um... yeah... by 10am-bedtime · · Score: 1

      there will probably be no such (emergent) leader if the current leadership keeps control. the corruption of human beings is a thoroughly studied art by now. if the leadership is wise they corrupt w/ wisdom, any other type is inferior in the long run.

    6. Re:Um... yeah... by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      mod above post up

    7. Re:Um... yeah... by isa-kuruption · · Score: 0, Troll

      Now, 600 years later, a European colony is the world's dominant economic, technological and military power

      You're talking about the United States, right? Because last time I checked, the United States was still the largest economic house in the world, still the leader of technology innovation, and definately has the most well trained, well equipped and well educated military in the world.

      Of course I know you were talking about China... silly me. But nonetheless your statement (if about China) is incorrect, not to say it won't be correct in 50 years, mind you, but that's another story, and a lot can change in 50 years. A lot can change in 20 years....

    8. Re:Um... yeah... by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      You're talking about the United States, right? Because last time I checked, the United States was still the largest economic house in the world, still the leader of technology innovation, and definately has the most well trained, well equipped and well educated military in the world.

      Yes, the US is a European colony. That's not to disparage its nation status; I merely wanted to display that there is a clear line between the present-day US supremacy and achievements of the early European explorers like da Gama and Magellan and of course Columbus himself was cut from the same cloth. And that was a typo, i meant "500 years later" i.e. now.

    9. Re:Um... yeah... by pmz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Our politicians don't think any farther ahead than the next election.

      In the interest of keeping the USA a free nation, this is the strongest argument against implementing government-managed social programs, such as social security and nationalized health care. The only way for people really to watch out for themselves and their families is to either do it themselves or hire a private firm they can trust isn't in it for a quick buck. The government is always in it for the quick buck (or vote).

      In China, the government can plan for the long term, because the people have no individual liberty to do so for themselves, as well as not having the inaliable liberties described in the US Constitution. Hell, even Hillary Clinton's book was censored by the Chinese government without her permission (a good recent example). The Chinese government savors keeping its people ignorant and submissive, and, as a US citizen, I find that totally unacceptible.

    10. Re:Um... yeah... by Mannerism · · Score: 1

      But in 1433, the new Ming emperor and his bureaucrats grew afraid of the rapidly expanding merchant class, who were growing wealthy through international trade, and began to pass laws to limit economic growth, to keep political power firmly in the hands of the Dynasty. By 1500 it was a capital offense to own or construct a vessel with more than 2 masts.

      The rest of your post focuses on the apparently negative consequences of this decision, but I'd have to say that the emperor did assess the threat correctly. In Europe, at about the same time, the rise of the merchant class was contributing to the downfall of the nobility. Would China's strong central government -- an institution that persists today and which, one could argue, is essential to the creation and execution of long-range national plans -- have survived if merchant power had gone unchecked?

    11. Re:Um... yeah... by glyph42 · · Score: 1

      The Chinese government savors keeping its people ignorant and submissive

      Consider for a moment that most human beings are not idiots. From my own observations, my friends who are the best at sniffing out cons and snow-jobs, and finding flaws, nepitism and favoritism in beaurocracies, and are best able to handle such situations efficiently, are from China. Most north-americans that I know (including myself) would simply not survive in China, until they were taken to the cleaners several times and wisened up a little. Even if a government is striving to keep its citizens ignorant and submissive, it hardly means the citizens end up that way.

      --
      Music speeds up when you yawn, but does not change pitch.
    12. Re:Um... yeah... by pmz · · Score: 1

      Most north-americans that I know (including myself) would simply not survive in China, until they were taken to the cleaners several times and wisened up a little.

      And likewise. There are ample stories about people in China being taken to the cleaners over stock investments and credit cards.

      In fact, all humans are idiots out of ignorance. People learn from the school of hard knocks faster than any other method. Probably the most useful legislation the US goverment could ever do is require every student to memorize this single sentence "Follow the money trail." Once people learn how to spot financial conflicts of interest, 99% of naivete seems to evaporate almost immediately.

    13. Re:Um... yeah... by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      The rest of your post focuses on the apparently negative consequences of this decision, but I'd have to say that the emperor did assess the threat correctly. In Europe, at about the same time, the rise of the merchant class was contributing to the downfall of the nobility.

      Well, it was the right decision perhaps for that Emperor and his immediate family and supporters, in that it cemented his power. But it was very bad indeed for the Ming Dynasty and for China as a whole. Tiny, distant Holland was more powerful in the Pacific than China was, in the 17th century. You might say that military power isn't an end in itself, and you'd be right, but one thing Europeans understood very early on, that few other cultures did, was that military power is a function of technological and economic prowess, and that the price of that was political freedom. The power of Europe's rulers changed; no longer could they govern by fiat, so some might say they were weaker and certainly the gap between a king and a merchant had changed. But in absolute terms they had become more powerful; now a king could order an expedition to India or to the Americas, for example, something that an earlier king simply could not do, despite having the power of life and death over his subjects. The Ming Emperor of 1433 (I forget his name) failed to grasp this subtlety, and he condemned China to 500 years of subservience.

      If Cheng Ho had staged a coup (altho' there was never any indication that he even wanted to), or more likely one of his supporters at court had, and Cheng's fleet had remained intact and he had been permitted to continue exploring, history would have turned out very different indeed. Perhaps European colonists heading west from Massachussets would have met Chinese settlers heading east from what we call California?

  102. Chinese Space Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I want to see Chinese Scifi movies with all characters including the evil aliens speaking Mandarin!

  103. Whatever it's not like by abolith · · Score: 1
    they would tell us if there were any problems during the flight. They just roll the same PR as everyone else "evrything went smooth, and the pilot is doing great" I have heard that crap before

    --
    if you want "No More Hiroshimas" then I say "You First. No More Pearl Harbors."
    1. Re:Whatever it's not like by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Watch out, someone will accuse you of being a conspiracy nut, and others will tell you to put on a tinfoil hat.

      And knowing is half the babble!

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  104. Congratulations! by pr0ntab · · Score: 1

    You replied to a known troll.

    Does the fact that he signs with his supposed credentials seem in any way suspicious to you?

    Besides, I can't think of one Indian person I know in college who reads slashdot, mostly because people here curse them out non-stop, blaming them for lost jobs.

    --
    Fuck Beta. Fuck Dice
  105. Re:Does this mean we get a Chinese on Star Trek no by uberdave · · Score: 1

    Does the name Kahn Noonian Singh ring a bell? Also, Picard had an Indian as chief engineer for a while. Come to think of it, there was a Chinese engineer as well.

    On the other hand, it has taken them close to a thousand years to move from inventing the rocket to getting into space. So maybe the Chinese influx into Starfleet happens a century after Voyager returns home.

  106. You lack a sense of historical perspective. by pr0ntab · · Score: 2

    China has always been crowded, and always been centrally administered/socialist, since 1500BCE and earlier.

    It's the only way they have managed to survive. Eventually as they continue industrializing (and reduce the population vs. land area, esp. in rural zones) conditions will improve.

    We want China to keep striving at "pointless" pursuits. It's a good sign, overall; regardless of the unpalatable practices (and that's your opinion) that many suffer under.

    --
    Fuck Beta. Fuck Dice
    1. Re:You lack a sense of historical perspective. by praksys · · Score: 1

      China has always been crowded, and always been centrally administered/socialist, since 1500BCE and earlier. It's the only way they have managed to survive.

      (1) England (and some other parts of Europe in fact) has a higher population density than China.

      (2) India has many of the same population and economic problems that China has but has never* managed to produce starvation on the same scale that the chinese communists have.

      (3) China was never even remotely socialist before the communists took over.

    2. Re:You lack a sense of historical perspective. by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 0

      So, they're still chinks..
      Nothing will change that, ever.
      A chink is a chink is a chink..

  107. In 22nd Cent Columbus day = Rutan Day ! Liwei Day by turtleshadow · · Score: 1

    Since Columbus day was on 10/12/03 in the USA I have to mention that while China's effort is indeed history book worthy the world is on the cusp of something even greater.

    The privitazation of space travel will definately get a boost to the world's economy as private entrepenurs exploit new technology and we finally get the Columbus factor in our lifetime.

    1) reliable proven technology (reusable ships)
    2) People with the spirt of adventure (companies that don't outsource everything)
    3) Politicos investing in lucrative deals (Isabella==Carly Fina?)

    Indeed Liwei San opened up a door for his country, but whoever earns the X-Prize opens the door for the next century and the rest of humanity.

    My bet's on Spaceship One & Rutan

  108. The reason for returning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm..why was the mission so short??..
    My theory is that they forgot to install a lavatory in the spaceship so the astronaut had to return for "urgent" matters.

  109. Just Curious by thellamaman · · Score: 1

    .. are you 15 years old?

  110. 3) Not remotely socialist... by pr0ntab · · Score: 1

    no, it was empirial. And everyone was encouraged to become civil servants, merchants were frowned upon, and resources were aggresively micromanaged by local magnates. Expressing excessive emotion, or religious conviction beyond societial norms was consider immoral.

    Huh, sounds pretty socialist to me. It was only AFTER they tried to Westernize in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and FAILED, that they reverted to old ways under the guise of a (new) Communist revolution.

    --
    Fuck Beta. Fuck Dice
    1. Re:3) Not remotely socialist... by praksys · · Score: 1
      no, it was empirial

      That is a system of political organisation, not a system of economic organisation, and in fact the Imperial system existed for only part of China's history. Before that it was Feudal.

      ...And everyone was encouraged to become civil servants...

      No, only a tiny fraction of the population were ever encouraged to become civil servants.

      ...merchants were frowned upon...

      But very common - far more common than civil servants. China had a well developed money economy long before most of Europe, and was one end of one of the oldest and most important trade routes to ever exist (the silk road).

      and resources were aggresively micromanaged by local magnates

      But they were generally not owned by the state.

      Expressing excessive emotion, or religious conviction beyond societial norms was consider immoral.

      But the social norms did require *a lot* of religious activity. Even today almost every home in China has a shrine - and that in a country where everyone is supposed to be an atheist. The norms against expressing emotion were hardly unique to China either. Ancient Rome, and Modern Britan had similar norms that were just as strong.

      Huh, sounds pretty socialist to me.

      If China was socialist then so was most of the world up until the 17th century.

  111. Fellow Comrades! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Slashdot - Your comrades have achieved great victory. Rejoice!

  112. The mandatory Kent Brockman-like declaration by Beechmere · · Score: 0

    And I, for one, welcome our new Chinese space-faring overlords. I'd like to remind them that as a trusted Computer Programmer, I can be helpful in rounding up others to . . . toil on their asteroid mines and moon colonies."

  113. How would that go? by MBoffin · · Score: 1

    "One small step for Yang, one giant leap for a third of Mankind."

  114. Interesting Poll... by Valkyre · · Score: 1

    On cnn.com:

    Do you fear China's manned space launch will ignite a new Cold War-style space race?

    Yes
    No

    Just a thought, I really dont understand the 'fear'. A space race would be a wonderfull thing today I think, not something to be afraid of.

    Just idle thoughts at 2am...

    --
    What the heck is a 'sig'?
  115. horrendously offtopic by Binary+Gibbon · · Score: 1

    no - quidquid in latin means 'whatever'.

  116. There are VERY BIG military implications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Proliferation is going to get worse. One major force behind the US/USSR space race was to build a rocket powerful enough to go around the earth. Yes, it's neat for exploration, adventure etc.

    BUT, it means that you can now send a nuclear bomb anywhere in the world in less than 30 minutes. Many people think that's what really drove the space race.

    Given the Chinese tendency to sell any weapons systems they have to anybody with money, this is a big problem. They'll probably sell them to Iran, North Korea, and other nuclear wannabe states run by brutal dictators.

    Iran won't even let inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency into the country.

    1. Re:There are VERY BIG military implications by RichardY · · Score: 1
      Iran won't even let inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency into the country.

      Not sure how thats any different to Amnesty International not being allowed into camp X-Ray.

      Innocent until proved guilty my arse.

      But your point about Nuclear weapons being sent anywhere in the world within 30 minutes is well taken!

    2. Re:There are VERY BIG military implications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iran won't even let inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency into the country.
      Not sure how thats any different to Amnesty International not being allowed into camp X-Ray.


      Iran, a sovereign nation, signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation treaty, where it is specified that they have to let the IAEA inspect their facilities.

      Iran has publicly stated in the past that as soon as they develop a nuclear bomb they will lob it at Israel.

    3. Re:There are VERY BIG military implications by RichardY · · Score: 1
      Iran, a sovereign nation, signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation treaty, where it is specified that they have to let the IAEA inspect their facilities.

      Its a fair call. Although I believe that the US signed the Geneva convention treaty which governs the treatment of prisoners of war.

      I honestly think that if Israel stopped incursions into other peoples land, that the risk of Iran responding so violently might be mitigated slightly.

    4. Re:There are VERY BIG military implications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Geneva Convention only applies to soldiers in uniform; the terrorist scum housed at XRay are illegal combatants. Nice Try.

  117. Video of this historic even? by jeeryg_flashaccess · · Score: 1

    Does anybody know where I can get decent...NON STREAMING video of this historic even? I've check some torrent sites and all the common news sites. CNN sucks...you have to pay...even then it's streaming...no torrent sites have video, but they have lots of "kill bill" and porn. Argh. A little help anybody?

    Greg

    -END-

    --
    Life is like pants... fit in or you don't fit in.
  118. Why learn Cantonese? by gotr00t · · Score: 1
    Mandarin is the official dialect of China, and is THE most widely spoken language, with over 800 million speakers. Cantonese is a dialect only spoken in some southern regions of China, and with the goverment heavily promoting a singular dialect (mandarin), it would be near impossible to not find people who can speak Mandarin in a traditionally Cantonese region.

    So, given the opportunity, I would recommend Mandarin over Cantonese, as it is more useful, and IMO, it just "sounds" more pleasing and less "annoying".

  119. Speaking of Mars by Databass · · Score: 1


    The image of a Chinese taikonaut planting a red chinese flag on Mars first might stir up some action in the US.

  120. More competition in space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although I am not a Chinese, I am very happy to hear this news. Since USSR disintegrated , there has been no international competitions in space development. The international space station is ceasing all competitions between American, Europeans and Russians. Even after the disaster in early this year, US is still planning to send back the school bus with wings designed back in '70's to space. There is no active US project to design the next generation manned spacecraft.

    I wish US government feels threat from the China's successful space development, and restart spending money to energize its projects.

  121. Re:Spaceshots more important than bringing freedom by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    This was the argument Bush made as a reason to attack Iraq (operation freedom!). Maybe USA should attack China to liberate their people? Oh right... They only attack weaker and undeveloped countries without nuclear weapons or anything like that, to stay safe. Forgot.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  122. I call that confidence by xixax · · Score: 1

    We didn't hear about it until *after* he'd got back. What if something had gone wrong? "Astronaut? What astronaut? We haven't seen any astronaut..."

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  123. Stephen Baxter's Titan by Nicke_J · · Score: 1
    This reminds me of the book "Titan" by Stephen Baxter.

    First he surmises the Challenger accident (if you haven't read it, it's worth doing just for that!), then the Chinese manned space flight, the manned flight to Titan, the US-Chinese war... ups, getting ahead of myself, we'll still have to wait a while for that...

    1. Re:Stephen Baxter's Titan by Nicke_J · · Score: 1
      Argh, to err is human.

      Of course I mean the Columbia accident... He'd have to be a real Nostrabaxter to get Challenger right in his 1997 book.

  124. Last Trip by horus2003 · · Score: 1

    On their first trip to outher space, Yang Liwei has gone mad. He told everyone he had seen the Chinese Wall form space.

    Chinese scientists think Yang has gone dillusional in space and are confinsed it's not safe for Chinese man to be in space.

    Future trips have been cancelled.

  125. I just received this email from a source in US by guet · · Score: 1

    No kidding, I just got the following email from the US (one of many others, I rarely receive spam from anywhere else).

    Perhaps when your country does something about the flood of spam from within its own borders someone might listen to your bleating.

    {spam changes="emails removed"}
    From xxxx@freemail.lt Thu Oct 16 00:29:12 2003
    Return-path:
    Received: from mac.com (smtpin03-en2 [10.13.10.148])
    by ms22.mac.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003))
    with ESMTP id for xxxxx@mac.com; Wed,
    15 Oct 2003 14:09:31 -0700 (PDT)
    Received: from freemail.lt (dsl-200-95-84-88.prodigy.net.mx [200.95.84.88])
    by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin03/MantshX 3.0) with ESMTP id h9FL9TKI020792; Wed,
    15 Oct 2003 14:09:30 -0700 (PDT)
    Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 17:16:02 -0400
    From:
    Subject: uS Pharmacy Will Write your Prescriptions bsnfpdvq
    To: xxxx@mac.com
    Message-id:
    MIME-version: 1.0
    Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
    Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
    Original-recipient: rfc822;xxxx@mac.com

    Our US Pharmacy is Open to You!

    We Now Have Xanax, Valium, and Levitra
    From US Pharmacies, not Mexico or Pakistan

    - Discreet and Fast Next-Day Shipments
    - Prescriptions written by US Doctors

    Look at our Huge Selection

    Do Not Send Future Mailings

    the political sense, Cicero, and St. Augustine after him, from the village, and over the fields the larks rose trilling, one the forehead, turned down on the nose, and heals in the new position.
    {/spam}

    1. Re:I just received this email from a source in US by Dave21212 · · Score: 1


      hehehe, yeah, it's a global issue, no doubt !

      By the way, I would recommend the Xanax...

      --
      "Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech."--Benjamin Franklin
  126. vely good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah so, Chinese vely clevel, put astlonaut on locket and send into space, come back safely!

    Confucious say, flom space, ealth look like plate of moo goo gai pan!

  127. Re:Time to fork^H^H^H^H chopstick slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    subject sez all

  128. China is asking by t0ny · · Score: 1

    I think China was competing for the X-Prize!

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    1. Re:China is asking by sean23007 · · Score: 1

      :) That's awesome. They should launch again next week and ask for the money.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
  129. Questionalble success - just a short episode by Captain+Igloo · · Score: 1

    If you read both the the official chinese statements and most news items in western media, the impact of the chinese manned space flight boils down to one single objective:

    National pride

    This also explains, why both Russia and America have cut down their manned space programs - people are not that much interested in being proud of their nation-state, therefore, the taxpayers are not willing to pour money into such costly efforts.

    Please remember: The scientific or commercial efficiency of such programs is extremely bad, most of the ressources are wasted for life support and safety. The only motivation for China to send an astronaut into space was to glorify the nation-state and to create a national hero.

    This kind of heroism and nationalism is typical for both western and soviet industrial societies in the 1940s to 1960s. Since then, it has started to vanish. Apollo was stopped because public attention declined. China is just repeating the economical and social development that we did in the 1960s. That's why they also start with spaceflight this way.

    Their manned space program is an indication that their social and economical development stage is close to ours in the 1960, although they will keep on catching up fast. But while they catch up, they will soon gain insight into the ecomomical aspects of space flight and cut down their manned space program.

    Recommended reading: Grumpy old men - the future ain't what it used to be

  130. Of course!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because, as everyone knows, the USA-capitalistic-style 'democracy':

    (1) Do not openly mass-murder people, but let other dictators do it with their support.

    (2) Do not tend to persecute the religious openly, but do so in practise, when that religion isn't catholicism (and most noticable when it's islamitism).

    (3) The USA never threatened to destroy the USSR, and have never destroyed a number of other democracies, notably by setting up a coup against elected leaders and installing a dictator in their place. (/end sarcasm)

    I once read that USA citizens, contrary to Europeans, think 'communist' is a far worse insult then 'nazi', where europeans think it's just the reverse. That article may have a point.
    I wonder if there will be a time that the majority of people would rather be called a communistic nazi then a USA-citizen?

  131. Re:In 22nd Cent Columbus day = Rutan Day ! Liwei D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Indeed Liwei San opened up a door for his country

    -san is Japanese. Muppet.

  132. For Fun and Profit, Learn Both by justanothergrue · · Score: 1

    The really cool Hong Kong cinema is still a lot of Cantonese and those southern regions you spoke of are largely natively Cantonese. The new economic zones of Zhuhai and Shenzhen are both heavily Cantonese and it reaches up to the border of Guangdong prov with Guangxi prov. Guangzhou in Guangdong is a great place to make money as are ZH and SZ. If you want to talk to the people then either language will do fine.

  133. The Chinese by TheVidiot · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our new Chinese masters!

  134. Your Compelling Reason by justanothergrue · · Score: 1

    The PRC is now in a position regarding labour and human rights that is quite similar to the USA 100 to 150 years ago. That is, a strong, technologically advanced empire has been built on the backs of an enormous prolitariate, the exploitation of sub-classes (in the USA's case, blacks, natives, the Irish, poor immigrants) and natural resources with few constraining laws to block profitability. The trouble is, while wealth in the USA was distributed amongst a few super-powerful socio-political special interests, in China it is largely centralized within the institution of the Communist Party - a party that has not been Communist in function for more than twenty years.

    The industrial, financial and social reforms that were instituted in the early '80s have transformed China from a land where people were outcast from society because their grandfathers owned capital in the 1940s to a nation of opportunity for anyone with enough smarts, cunning and connections - i.e. no different than any western so-called democracy.

    Now you see, the more that China (and India, Vietnam, anyone) exploits the first world nations' rapacious appetite for acquisition of material goods, the more that production will shift out of the first world and into the second world and third world. Gradually, over generations, this builds second world nations into first world superpowers/hegemonies. 3WNs (third world nations), if they have sufficient means, will start supplying the ascendant new hegemonies with cheaper goods. The other 3WNs will become breeding grounds for disease, poverty and what TROTW (the rest of the world) will see as terrorism.

    In China, the creation of industrial barons, mostly with connections to The Party, _will_ in fact distribute wealth and power.

    Will it solve all the problems of human rights, poverty and everything western 1WN hypocrites complain about concerning China? Of course not. But then again, considering the human rights abuses inside the USA, the non-functioning so-called democratic system, the ownership of the government by industrial barons, the brainwashing of the people by mass big-monied media, the rampant flouting of international law, really, the USA and most 1WNs have no cause to complain other than that they see someone new on the field who's just as capable of playing dirty cricket as the current old school players.

    1. Re:Your Compelling Reason by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      A few problems with your theory:
      1. The netire world can't live at the standard we are living at. Why? The earth simpy can't support it, if nothing else, there is not enough land on earth to grow the amount of food the average american consumes and wastes. What about othe rplanets? Give me a break. Mars is simply too small to have the necessary atmosphere. Not enough gravity to hold an earth liek atmosphere.
      2. An earlier article states that everyone in china has an eual oppurtunity. Never went outside hong kong, have you? Didn't know there was a rural china? Yep, and in many ways china is a third world nation in that respect.
      3. "3WNs (third world nations), if they have sufficient means, will start supplying the ascendant new hegemonies with cheaper goods." At best, oil will runout in 50 years. China and india are both overburdening their water supplies and will cause a drought of biblical levels in the next fifty years (india in only 30). Tens to hundreds of millions are expected to die if something isn't doen now and guess what, nothing is. Global warming, food shortages, take your pick. Your theory would come true in a perfect world where the world remained the constant it has been for the last twenty years, but it won't. If nothing else, chinas political system that leaves no clear succession for its rulers will be its undoing. Ever see a chinese civil war? 1860's - 300-500 million ppl died.
      4. The world is not a constant. The world has largely sidestepped and ignored the UN throughout the cold war and now that we have to actually play by its rules, many countries are becoming fed up by it. It is based on many invalid assumptions - that the world will never change from its current boundaries, and that the countries who do participate are capable of upholding the UN's mandates. We are supposedly still allies of Europe. It won't last. We are supposeldy still friends with China, that won't last either. The UN's worst assumption is that collectie security - the idea that when one country steps out of line, everyone else will act to stop them - simply doesn't work. We are already seeing its demise. Now instead of one country going to the UN to air its greivances and then have the UN look at the issue and make a descision, wer are instead seing the old system of grand alliances were one alliance goes to the UN with an issue and is opposed by another grand alliance. That is collective defense - that one alliance won't dare risk going to war against another. All we need is one issue where both sides refuse to give and we can say goodbye to the UN. The only thing keeping the world as it is is the threat of nuclear war and with the increassing number of nuclear countries and the increasing raalization that the super powers can't use the stockpiles they have, that glue is becoming unstuck. What did it take to make the world unstable? Three jets, 15 people, and 2 towers. The world is a house of glass and all its inhabitants are taking up the art of stone throwing. One hostile nuke detonation anywhere and it will all come tumbling down and with north korea, pakistan, india, and iran all having them and having the will to use them? It's slim pickins on the bomb.

      In aperfect world, China will become like the united states and we will all work together with europe and the rest of the world to either bring a dystopia or a utopia but in the real world, there is a far greater chance of things getting messy. China launched a rocket and put a man in space? A kick start to the US space program? More likely a second cold war - this time in space as well as on earth. Rather than cheering we shoudl be building bomb shelters and puting our heads between our legs to kiss our asses goodbye.

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
  135. Re:Taikonaut: greek word in roman letters?? by Monsieur_F · · Score: 2, Informative

    In France it happens that French cosmonauts (when taking part to a Russian mission) or astronauts (with NASA) are simply called "spationauts".

    (I think the word is for all Europeans, but I only know its use in French).

    --
    McCartney fans pay bus tickets. [...] Lennon fans too, with discretion.
  136. Long March envy or denial? by smchris · · Score: 1


    We aren't launching diddley right now, so the universal "Been there, done that -- 40 years ago" attitude of the media is a little disingenious.

    Where is the evidence of this being cheap propaganda? Solar panels? A module that can be left in space? Seems like they want to move to a space station quickly. I hope they do. Shoot for the moon colony.

    Science Friday the other week noted that it took 66 years to go from Kitty Hawk to the moon. What have we done in the last 34 years that is so great? Can't even take a Concorde flight anymore. I hope the Chinese do set off a second space race.

  137. China Effort in Perspective by amightywind · · Score: 1

    Congratulations China! You almost duplicated Gordon Cooper's Mercury flight of 1963!

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
    1. Re:China Effort in Perspective by ChaoticCoyote · · Score: 1

      And given that our first flight involved a simple "up and down" -- no real orbits -- for Alan B. Shepard, and that Cooper's flight was the sixth flight of the U.S. program -- let's just say I wouldn't be ringing those bells of arrogance quite yet.

      The Russians managed three full orbits on their first try. We didn't do that until Glenn, our third flight.

      The Chinese, as always, have a plan for future exploration. What plan does NASA have?

      And let's hope the Chinese do better than NASA, the latter having killed their astronauts with stupid bureaucratic decisions.

    2. Re:China Effort in Perspective by amightywind · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The Russians managed three full orbits on their first try. We didn't do that until Glenn, our third flight.

      Gagarin flew 1 orbit. I think Leonov flew 17 on the second.

      The Chinese did have 4 unmanned test flights.

      The Chinese, as always, have a plan for future exploration. What plan does NASA have?

      The Chinese plan (rhetoric) sounds a lot like NASA's plans after Apollo. I don't doubt that there will be 2 lonely Chinese camped out in a minimal space station, no doubt of Russian design, within 10 years. To what end, besides flag waiving?

      And let's hope the Chinese do better than NASA, the latter having killed their astronauts with stupid bureaucratic decisions.

      Fly any test vehicle as many times as the shuttle has and you will have problems. The failure of the shuttle is not the bureaucracy so much as the lack of builtin robust crew escape and abort capability. Do you think there are no bureaucrats in China?

      --
      an ill wind that blows no good
  138. Translation by Robaticus · · Score: 1

    I just translated the writing on the side of the Chinese rocket. It said "Use only with parental supervision. Light fuse and get away."

  139. Great. Until he vies for control of Alpha Centauri by kulakovich · · Score: 1

    This is all well and good, but we KNOW that this guy will one day cause us interminable problems vieing for control of Planet. He's wiley that Yang.

    Sorry. Couldn't resist. - Or am I the only /.er still playing Sid Meiers AC?

    The fact that he's even decked out in blue makes it all the more savory.

    kulakovich

  140. Loral Space - Bill Clinton by kc0dxh · · Score: 1

    Where's the discussion of how much of Loral Space's technology was used in this mission. Where's the discussion of what changes would be necessary from this mission to an ICBM.

    This is, afterall, COMUNIST China. The same philosophy that gave the world such memorable occurrances of bread lines, unvaccinated children, Tiananmen Square, and life-in-jail or death based on religeous beliefs. Such discussion and preparation for what comes next is overdue.

    --

    --- "1.21 Jigawatts!" -Doc

  141. Suuuuuure he did.,, by csoto · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who saw "Capricorn One?"

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
    1. Re:Suuuuuure he did.,, by cronostitan · · Score: 0

      Am I the first one to tell you that you are an idiot?

      --
      Spelling errors were made for your amusement only...
  142. Launch should not be news by bluGill · · Score: 1

    A space launch should not be news. When it is news it means that it is new and exciting enough for people to care. It didn't make national headlines when I backed my car out of the driveway this morning without killing anyone. I presume that many airplaces have taken off from the local airport today, but not one made the news so I really don't know for sure. I'm guessing that several babies have been born today, but I won't know until/unless I read the stork report inside (not on the cover) of next weeks paper, and then it will only cover births at the nearest hospital. I could go on, but I think you get the point.

    Space launchs should not be news, they should be something that someone does for a purpose. Preferably a company. research university, or military (though we all wish for world peace I don't think it is obtainable), not a government. People should be going into space because their job requires it, or they are curious about something best seen/done/tried in space.

  143. That's nothing! by antin · · Score: 1

    My car is based on designs a few hundred thousand years old - good thing those pesky neanderthals didn't patent the wheel!

  144. Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a stupid joke.

  145. Asian space race: China, India, Japan by peter303 · · Score: 1

    All three of these countries have orbited satellites and plan manned space capability. Good to see some part of the world looking toward space as the US and Russia lose interest.

  146. One big difference... by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    ...terrorists don't blow up, and even if we did we are hell bent on keeping them IN XRay.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  147. Re:Um... yeah...--What makes this different by randall_burns · · Score: 1

    Between 1433 and 1945, China experienced the utter humiliation and degradation of the opium trade. Imagine for a moment living in a country where 1/4 people are junkies-that is what China was like--and that is a major factor that changed after the communist revolution.

    At this point population control laws (the one child rule) has weighted the Chinese population heavily towards males. That means that in China there is by historical standards an enormous incentive for Chinese men to attain social status-the number of men in the bottom rung who can never hope to marry has increased rather markedly.

    It is my contention that these two factors combine to make it plausible that China may display behavior that is uncharacteristic of China.

    My sincere hope is that the Chinese continue to succeed with their space program-and that this serves to wake up the American people how poorly their own government and corporate elites have acted in facilitating the development of space. A lot of major political and corporate leaders in America deserve to be replaced-and the Chinese space effort just might help make that happen.

    This mission isn't quite a "Chinese Sputnik"--but a successful, large Chinese space station just might wake a few folks up--as might some visibly successful chinese space industries.

  148. Re:Spaceshots more important than bringing freedom by toupsie · · Score: 1

    Where do you live? I will call my congressman.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  149. This is really great news by thepustule · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is great news, and quite refreshing, to see someone actually moving *ahead* in aerospace.

    The entire aerospace field has been a complete disappointment since the 1970's.

    - the biggest, baddest civilian jetliner that still "rules the skies" is the Boeing 747 - from the late 60's

    - the giant B52s carpet-bombing the Taliban last year were from the 60's

    - We are witnessing the last flights of the Concorde - a monumental aerospace achievement - from the late 60's

    - the world's fastest air-breathing jet, the SR71 Blackbird - also from the late 60's - is now completely retired.

    - the fastest rocket plane - the X-15 - was retired in the 60's.

    - the aging Space Shuttle (NASA's pride and joy) is 1970s technology that didn't fly until the 80's

    America in general, and NASA in particular, have done nothing, and gone nowhere in aerospace in the last quarter century. Compare the 747/Concorde/Blackbird/SaturnV of 1969 with the Spitfire and V2 of 1944. Now that was progress!

    It's about time someone else has stood up with even the beginnings of a challenge to American dominance and arrogance in space. America deserves it - they've squandered a 25 year lead. I hope China makes it far. I hope they get to the moon. I hope they build New Beijing on the Lunar South Pole Basin. I am sick and tired of listening to the tired old American "who cares? we were there first" line. So what? What did you manage to do there? Run around, pick up stones, and leave? Good job! You couldn't even get back there now if you wanted to! How many of the engineers and scientists that put Armstrong on the moon are retired? How many of them are even still alive?

    America's best achievement right now is the International Space Station. Really, it's just another Mir. Nothing new. Barely outside our atmosphere. I mean come on! Maybe this new development will inspire some new ideas and dreams. Maybe it will propel us at least to the moon again. We need a kick in our proverbial backside.

    History will look back on the Kennedy-inspired moon shots as a false start. A sputter of something that failed even as it got going. Ok, but now it's time to let the adventure really begin! Let's get out there and DO something!

  150. Re:Not a Hoax, but...you ???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it is in local time around 8:00AM, what do you expect to see, stars?

  151. Tsien founded JPL by Stephen+Ma · · Score: 1

    Member? Tsien was the primary founder of JPL.

  152. Yep, we're in violent agreement. by devphil · · Score: 1


    I never said they'd wouldn't fall eventually, just that they'd get there long before us. :-)

    Hopefully there won't be any horribly major fuckwits to completely mao up their space program. It'd be nice if at least one nation on this planet could pull its head out of its mao and reach for the stars.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:Yep, we're in violent agreement. by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      Hopefully there won't be any horribly major fuckwits to completely mao up their space program

      You know, it's strange. Fascists are quite rightly reviled by our culture. Yet, despite Mao, Stalin, Kim Jong-Il and other Communists, who make the Nazi's worst excesses pale in comparison, it is still considered acceptable to be a Communist in the modern-day West. I wonder why that is.

  153. State TV by MrBlackBand · · Score: 1
    As a side note, I was watching a BBC report on PBS the other day about the launch. Whenever the reporter refered to the Chinese media he never forgot to say "state-owned" or "state-controlled".

    After all, we know that state-owned media is Evil(tm), except when it's the BBC or PBS...

    --
    "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it."
  154. ISS still wondering where their order is! by inteller · · Score: 1

    They ordered 2 fried rice and potstickers....where are they?!?!?!?!

  155. Re:Um... yeah...--What makes this different by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

    It is my contention that these two factors combine to make it plausible that China may display behavior that is uncharacteristic of China.

    That is a very insightful comment. The real question is the lenghts to which the Mao Dynasty is willing to go to maintain its grip on power.

    The economist Reuven Brenner says that democracy and capitalism are closely linked. Once you have private property and free trade, you have resources outside the control of the government and in the control of the market, and the market accustoms its particpants to being able to chose between competing offerings - in goods, in services, in entertainment. A totalitarian government doesn't even have to bother about censoring the press if it controls the only paper mills in the country. A popular press, tabloids and broadsheets, buying their own paper, running their own presses, selling to whoever wants to buy, adopting editorial stances... heady stuff. Once freedom starts to roll, it's nigh on unstoppable without naked force, and even then you can only postpone it. Pretty soon, China's government are going to have to decide, forwards or backwards? History isn't on the side of the Chinese establishment giving up their privileges easily.

  156. Space Race = Nuclear Race? by t482 · · Score: 1

    The rockets that power China's space programme are virtually indistinguishable from the intercontinental ballistic missiles that are intended to carry its nuclear warheads. China has been modernising and expanding its nuclear force for some time; it has already shown that it can release more than one satellite from a single rocket, giving it a capability to put multiple warheads on a single missile should it choose to do so.

    Shocked by America's technological wizardry on display in the first Gulf war, and even more so by the speed of its victory in the second, China is also working feverishly to overcome more conventional handicaps. Fighter aircraft, bombers, ships and submarines bought from Russia are aimed at deterring America from coming to the assistance of Taiwan, which China claims as its own, in any future crisis. So is the plan to deploy a new radar satellite in 2005, able to peek though the clouds to track America's naval movements near the island.

    (from economist.com)

  157. How much of Chinese History you really understand? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1



    Comprehending anything halfway is dangerous.

    Your story of Ming Dynasty's "great adventure on seafaring vassels" is another proof of half-cooked history wannabe telling the world his own half-cooked semi-historical-fiction.

    The Admiral Cheng-Ho's seafaring trips hundreds of years ago had a cetral mission - The emperor sent Admiral Cheng-Ho out to search for, and kill the emperor's political rival - his own brother.

    You see, the Ming's emperor overthrew his brother and grabbed the throne for himself. There was a great bloodbath, but after the bloodbath, nobody could find the body of the "former" emperor.

    That made everybody worried.

    What if the old emperor came back, with his own army and supporters ?

    What if the old emperor came back with the support of most of the people ?

    The only way out is to look for the old emperor. And story had it that the old emperor had escaped by ship, and was last reported sailing south, destination unknown.

    Do you think that the emperor of Ming dynasty was interested in trade, or setting up a WTO type of international bodies to speed up international trade ?

    Far from it. All the emperor was thinking about was to strengthen his own grab of the throne, and to do that he had to be sure that his political rival could no longer pose any threat to him. In other words, he had to kill his political rival, inside or outside China.

    Admiral Cheng Ho was nothing but an assassin disguise as an ambassador. All his eight seafaring trips, travelling as far as the East cost of Africa, was to search and kill his emperor's political rival.

    That's all.

    To put anything else on Cheng Ho's trip is just plain silly.

    Do you know what prompted Ming dynasty to clam shut China's border later on ?

    The failure of Cheng Ho to locate his emperor's political rival had made the ruling clan very nervous, and they were afraid that the political rival, and his offsprings, could come back from overseas and attacked them.

    That's why they shut down the border and didn't allow anymore international trade.

    You see, history is a very nice thing to learn, but if you wanna learn history, please be sure to know the entire story, not just a part of it.

    You can show the year, date, time, place, but if you don't know the entire story, all the things you have shown will all come to naught.

    Because your conclusion is based on your partial understanding of the Ming emperor's intention of sending Admiral Cheng Ho for his eight seafaring trip, your conclusion is unfortunately just plain wrong.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  158. Re:How much of Chinese History you really understa by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

    The emperor sent Admiral Cheng-Ho out to search for, and kill the emperor's political rival - his own brother.

    That's an interesting theory, but I can't find it in any of my books. Do you have a reference?

  159. Are jokes not part of the public domain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there some sort of copyright violation if someone retells a joke for non-commercial levity?

  160. Command & Conquer anyone ? by HansF · · Score: 1

    Does anybody have the same Command & Conquer Generals flashback as i do?
    Damn , the red army is entering another era.
    Now they will have new weapons, more skills...

    --
    --> Insert Funny Sig Here
  161. Surprised by Gonoff · · Score: 1

    Apparently he really startled the guys on the ISS. They had dialed out for pizza!

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
  162. Long term/short term by hey! · · Score: 1

    Europe was captialist for centuries before democracy took hold--and they largely propspered through the 1800s and early 1900s as a bunch of non-democratic capitalist states

    Certainly. I would argue that it is not accidental that every capitalist society eventually shed authoritarian and aristrocratic government forms, because without democracy the social mobility and its resultant upheaval would eventualy have torn the society apart. The ninetheenth century was a period of intense social upheaval, and concentrated efforts to find solutions to that upheaval; however the only sustainable solution that has ever been found is democracy.

    To be more specific, long term is longer than twenty five years. I doubt there has ever been a single capitalist country which has replaced a democratic system of government with a non-democratic one, and sustained both the new government form its capitalism for more than twenty five years. There are examples of democracy and capitalism being supplanted long term; and examples of democracy being supplanted short term, but never both in the long term.

    What China is attempting to do is to eliminate virtually most economic planning and social welfare guarantees while maintaining strict political control. As I noted this simply has never been done before. Pinochet destroyed Chile's democracy, but eventually had to step down. Poland's democratic institutions were suppressed for a long time, but this was accompanied by state economic planning.

    This is not to say that China won't succeed, only that there is no precedent for success. Every successful formula is at one point unprecedented, I suppose, so you can't count them out. However, I'm very skeptical.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  163. Reasons, Theories and Critiques by justanothergrue · · Score: 1

    Thanks for your intelligent reply however I have some comments on your opinion.

    1. The limitations on resources are why we're going to see more terrorism (as well as civil unrest) as the marginalized countries (as segments of society) see what they describe as 'decadence' among those countries who waste more in a month than they see in years. Thing is, if we shared some of what we've got, if we managed our resources better, there would be enough to go around for a lot longer.

    Re: other planets, I don't expect to see extra-solar space travel or Star Trekkian demi-utopias. I expect a terran dystopia with an ever increasing gap between a slave-like middle class, an untouchable unemployed class and the industrial baron-princes.

    2. Nice assumption, how'd you get to that one? I'm speaking from (admittedly limited) experience. In fact I've been through Hong Kong, Guangxi province and Guangdong province. Through. Not to one city. Through. As in travelling through. Stopping in villages, Seeing stuff, visiting family, buying chickens on the road, killing and plucking them myself, not assinine shutterbug toursim. No, I haven't been in the farthest 'outback' regions where the Party is colonizing Mandarin-speaking ethnics to overwhelm the natives. No, I haven't seen anyone carted off by the police. I have had to bribe my way through some situations with various gov't officials. In other cases I've been helped by genuinely nice and civic minded people. I have seen a lot of the reality of what's driving Chinese industrial and commercial "advancement". And a lot of it amounts to "we know labour is cheap here, lets use our own people and sell the rich Americans cheap crap." And my point is, to make myself clear, China is going to take advantage of its situation, and its own people, to move itself into a greater position of world power. Just like the current 1WNs did a century ago.

    I never made the claim everyone in China has equal opportunity. I'm simply stating that its significantly less draconian than a generation ago or a generation before that. See what I said "smarts, cunning and connections". A statement that applies a lot to TROTW anyway.

    3. You're making the assumption that I've not taken the limitations of the ecosphere into account. Most of the devastation your describing was supposed to happen by now according to a lot of doomsayers I remember quite well from the '70s. I expect it will be along shortly (perhaps 50 or 100 years).

    However, kudos to you, you're correct, I'm not over the age of 60 and do not remember any of the Chinese civil wars. Nor am I unfortunate to have been on site for the various uprisings that were crushed during my lifetime. I am quite familiar with how my wife and her parents remember their horrific expeiences since the 1930s and I do know how to read western and Chinese propaganda. However, that said, I'd be more concerned about American leadership succession right now anyway and try to figure out whether the military, intelligence or some other internal power will be the first declare the current regime illegal, stage a coup or begin arresting people. Oh, that's right, they've been doing it for three years now. Silly me.

    4. The UN is a polite lie. It always has been. It's called diplomacy. When the polite lie isn't useful, like any treaty the USA enters into, its discarded like a lit cigarette butt into dry leaves. You're absolutely right about the condition of the UN. The world powers have been destroying lesser powers and governments for decades either through assassination, economic manipulation, instigating coups, supporting gov'ts then pulling out, turning a blind eye to genocide then arming another group. The invasion of Iraq was only the most overt example of this. The USA could do this because, like Dennis Leary's song, "we have the bomb". I don't mean literally nuclear WMDs, but just the figurative Big Stick. The story about WMDs was another polite lie that some idiot thought TROTW would buy. Except some believe in the Big Lie of the U