Slashdot Mirror


Wal-Mart to Offer Wal-Mart Notebooks

ducomputergeek writes "Cnet News.com is running an article that Wal-Mart plans to launch its own line of notebook computers. I wonder if these will run Lindows or XP. We've purchased a couple low cost boxes with no OS's for cheap file servers and they've worked pretty well."

426 comments

  1. OS Licenses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    We've purchased a couple low cost boxes with no OS's for cheap file servers and they've worked pretty well

    Interesting admission indeed. I am calling the SPA right now. I'd like to see those Win2003 server licenses Michael.

    1. Re:OS Licenses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, too bad michael didn't say that...learn to read, and learn the difference between italics and normal text.

  2. Just what I need... by nacturation · · Score: 5, Funny


    A Wal-Mart notebook to go right next to my Arby's MP3 player. Although perhaps the logo can be sandblasted off so that users won't die of embarassment.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    1. Re:Just what I need... by mattjb0010 · · Score: 0

      Although perhaps the logo can be sandblasted off so that users won't die of embarassment in a Cayce Pollard-esque fashion. Although even then I still wouldn't use one.

    2. Re:Just what I need... by The+Snowman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As long as it can boot Linux, who cares? I could easily put a Tux sticker over the logo.

      Another poster was modded redundant for saying this, but come on, as long as it works in Linux and is cheaper than a "real" brand, who cares?

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    3. Re:Just what I need... by ron_ivi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I think it'd be smart for Wal*Mart to make it support both Linux & Microsoft -- just to have a better negotiating position when trying to get attractive OEM windows pricing.

      Interesting to see if they need Microsoft more or less than Microsoft needs them for this product.

    4. Re:Just what I need... by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Dude, its a "Great-Value" laptop, not a "Wal-Mart" laptop. No one will have a clue where you got it, they will just admire your ability to get Great Value deals at Great Value prices.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    5. Re:Just what I need... by rtphokie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As long as it can boot Linux, who cares? I could easily put a Tux sticker over the logo.

      The businesses who cant cut their unit price low enough for WalMart to give them the time of day, thats who.

      WalMart doesn't have low-low prices everyday because they like you. They've got these prices because they can pressure businesses into cutting their prices so low they barely make anything.

    6. Re:Just what I need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, its a "Great-Value" laptop, not a "Wal-Mart" laptop.

      Or maybe a "Sam's Choice" Laptop.

    7. Re:Just what I need... by notoriousE · · Score: 0

      No, you've got it all wrong, it's a "Sam's Choice" Notebook.

      --


      And then there was E
    8. Re:Just what I need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They've got these prices because they can pressure businesses into cutting their prices so low they barely make anything."

      2 points:

      1.) Walmart is huge, they can buy large quantites of items and lower the price.

      2.) Nobody must sell their stuff at WalMart.

      Those points may or may not fly in the face of what you meant. My response is directed to those who read that as "WalMart is evil."

    9. Re:Just what I need... by some+damn+guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can cry about the poor businesses all you want, but I don't think you will hear anyone who shops there complain. A lot of working families are a heck of a lot better off because discount stores like walmart help them stretch their dollars farther. Forcing someone else to pay more than is necessary for something so someone else can make more isn't necessarily a noble thing. These cheaper goods mean a lower cost of living for a great many people and thats a big benefit you can't ignore.

    10. Re:Just what I need... by The+Snowman · · Score: 1

      WalMart doesn't have low-low prices everyday because they like you. They've got these prices because they can pressure businesses into cutting their prices so low they barely make anything.

      I don't like Wal-Mart for several reasons. The two biggest are their support of sweatshop labor (what we don't know won't hurt you) and their treatment of employees (39 hours per week? NO HEALTH BENEFITS FOR YOU!). Like it or not, they are an example of successful capitalism. If that is at someone else's expense, oh well. That is the nature of the best. Survival of the fittest and all that.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    11. Re:Just what I need... by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They don't complain, but they probably should.

      The reason many consumers are so desperate for Wal-Mart's "Low, Low Prices" is because the ever-increasing demand for said prices has priced most of American manufacturing labor out of the market. Eventually, there will come a point where there just isn't enough money in consumer pockets to make it worth Wal-Mart's time to sell to American consumers. At that point, they'll just take the money they sucked out of the economy and go elsewhere.

      Wal-Mart destroys local competitors, eliminating jobs. Wal-Mart puts the hammerlock on its suppliers, forcing them to continue finding ways to lower their costs. Eventually, the only fat left to trim is the luxury of using "expensive" American labor instead of labor from countries that don't have pesky things like "minimum wage," "occupational safety," "environmental regulations," and the like. Wal-Mart even screws over its own employees, merrily cutting benefits even as their profits continue to climb.

      No, the average family shopping at Wal-Mart is simply going to be grateful that they can get stuff for so little. They don't realize that the low prices are a result of the same forces that have been taking money out of their pocket.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    12. Re:Just what I need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Although I am not in favor of Walmat, I don't
      buy your argument.


      Walmart is not forcing suppliers to layoff
      American workers and look for cheaper labor
      overseas. This would have happened regardless
      of Walmart: people always look to cut costs,
      at all times, and if Walmart did not exist they
      would still cut costs anyway.

    13. Re:Just what I need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      A Wal-Mart notebook to go right next to my Arby's MP3 player.

      Don't forget your McRFID! WalMart wants to track your shit.
      Hoping someone creates an RFID detector for the masses.

    14. Re:Just what I need... by really? · · Score: 1

      you say that "A lot of working families are a heck of a lot better off because discount stores like walmart help them stretch their dollars farther."

      I disagree. Sure, it looks that way in the short run, but in the long run those people are gettting the short end of the stick.

      For example, about 20 years ago I managed to talk my father into spending "an ungodly amount" - his words - for a nice leather living room set. He was going to go for a "wal-mart set", as had a couple of his neighbours. Now, his neighbours are on their third sets of cheap ass furniture and my fathers still looks in perfect condition - in fact it looks even better now that the leather is worn in here and there. End result, my father is well ahead of the game.

      My thinking has always been "I am too poor to buy cheap things." I don't care about price, I _DO_ care about price/performance.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    15. Re:Just what I need... by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's great. Does he have any 20 year old food or clothing for his 5 year old?

      The only places I see Wal-Marts are large urban areas that can support as much business as you can throw at them and rural areas that don't have a damn thing else around.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    16. Re:Just what I need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, while the coders and DoJ's been occupied with MS- Wally's been lubin all of the US for the takeover - expand, assimilate or terminate - There can be only one. And that one will be WalMart. To compete would take way too much capital. I'm talking in the trillions right now, who knows what it'll be like in ten years after Target and the like (especially Kmart) gasp their last gasp.

      Microsoft is playschool compared to the "Boys of Bentonville."

      Will the real Borg please stand up?

    17. Re:Just what I need... by RdsArts · · Score: 1

      WalMart doesn't have low-low prices everyday because they like you. They've got these prices because they can pressure businesses into cutting their prices so low they barely make anything.

      It's not like they're "undercutting" little mah-and-pah shops. This is computer hardware. If your making hardware, you have a sizable amount of cash.

      And usually many underpaid workers in a country with lax labor laws. But shhh, remember, we're indignant that those people using others for cheap labor are having their profits undercut. Not that the exploitation is going further.

      That said, this will possibly make hardware more expensive in the long-run, as manufacturers going out of business will push up production costs, and so on and so on. You can only undercut a market when the market still exists.

    18. Re:Just what I need... by Spoing · · Score: 1
      WalMart doesn't have low-low prices everyday because they like you. They've got these prices because they can pressure businesses into cutting their prices so low they barely make anything.

      Both WalMart and the companies supplying them will make a profit, or they won't continue with the arrangement. If WalMart laptops get returned because they break or are faulty -- at least during the return period -- WalMart will loose money and the supplier will likely loose money as well.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    19. Re:Just what I need... by fermion · · Score: 1
      The success of Walmart is based on three factors. The first, as commonly states, is price. The second, as less often admitted, is that people in the US believe they need a lot of stuff and deserve a lot of stuff. The third, hardly ever considered, is that Walmart represents standard US whitebread values.

      The the first isn't so great for the economy. The low prices of Walmart represents deflation. Deflation is bad because it can defer purchasing of products. Extremely low prices are also bad because it can skew indication of consumer demand, as the recent discounts on cars have done. Artificially low prices also skews consumer decision making, which is one reason for the recent tariffs in response to alleged foreign dumping. What is better, and this is agreed on by most sides, as shown by Bushes tax refund and the Democrats desire to increase social benefits, is to put more money in the hands of consumers so they can consume products, even as the prices increase at expected rates of inflation.

      The second thing is our desire for stuff. I see many people who obviously are not hurting for money shopping at Walmart. The reason the do so is because they can have more stuff. Why they want more stuff I do not know. I suppose have a TV in every room is important, especially if when you send the kid to the room for misbehaving you know that the kid is watching tv and not reading, or processing with friends, or pleasuring themselves. But even if one asserts that having lots of stuff is good, then the avenue to allowing consumers to get the stuff is through appropriate wages, not deflationary prices.

      The third thing is whitebread values. Walmart stores are all about pretending to be upstanding US citizens. Until they got laughed at for their "Made in America" campaign, they pretended to favor US made products. They actively censor entertainment content so as not offend the dominant moral US elite. They have traditionally discriminated against gays, unwed mothers, and as we all know, the good people from Mexico. Honestly this makes for a pleasurable shopping atmosphere for many people who could not tolerate the people they had to shop with in KMart.

      To be honest, so of this deflation, or at least very low inflation, may be good as an adjustment for they hyperinflation of the 70's, but still, if we want people to buy stuff, it would be better to give them the cash.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    20. Re:Just what I need... by blixel · · Score: 1

      Although perhaps the logo can be sandblasted off so that users won't die of embarassment.

      At yet you're oblivious the Wranger jeans you wear?

    21. Re:Just what I need... by blixel · · Score: 1

      At yet you're oblivious the Wranger jeans you wear?

      Wow - how did I screw that up so bad? So much for that joke.

      Should have read "And yet you're oblivious to the Wrangler jeans you wear?"

    22. Re:Just what I need... by TotallyUseless · · Score: 1

      mod this guy up!. I think within 5 years, people will be saying 'WalJobs' instead of McJobs.

      --

      Time for some tasty Shiner Bock!
    23. Re:Just what I need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only places I see Wal-Marts are large urban areas that can support as much business as you can throw at them and rural areas that don't have a damn thing else around.

      In the rual area where I live there used to be many different small stores in the area. There were several clothing stores, several hardware stores, several small appliance stores, etc. Now, there are no small clothing stores, one struggling hardware and paint store, and one small appliance store (which does most of its business as a repair shop.) The stores all closed up in the space of five or so years after a Walmart opened up the next town over.

      While the above is an argument by example and therefore may not be representitive of the general trend, perhaps in at least some rual areas the reason why they "don't have a damn thing else around" is because they were priced out by the local large discount chain superstore.

    24. Re:Just what I need... by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Wo who did WlaMart push out when they opened in my home town? Two big chains: Ben Franklin and Pamida. Good ridance to those stores, the same quality and WalMart, higher prices, and less varity (even when the two were combined). Those little stores are still doing just fine. Oh they come and go all the time, but they did before too, and they always survived by offering either quality products, or products WalMart (or Ben Franklin/Pamida) didn't offer.

      Many of those little stores actually do better with WalMart around. Once people are no longer running to Ridgedale or St.Cloud (each about 25 miles, but opposite directions) for a few things they started looking to the little stores for what WalMart didn't have just so they didn't have to make a trip. Those little stores are now helped too because they know they can't complete on price, so they find something they can compete on and we are better off.

      As for manufacturing jobs lost: been happening for years. No real loss, let someone else take those boring jobs. I hope for the sake of countries like China that they can get over the need to supply their needs with labor before robots reach the point where even at $1 a day those countries can't compete.

    25. Re:Just what I need... by finkployd · · Score: 1

      Easy to lay out a complaint, but what is the solution?

      Don't let small business ever get beyond a certain size? (to prevent them from becoming 'walmarts")

      Finkployd

    26. Re:Just what I need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work at a wal-mart full of gays, unwed mothers, and mexicans. Oh, and I started at $8.00 an hour. No, that's not really a lot. But it's more than every Weis and Giant in the area pays. Yet people still whine about wally world's pay

    27. Re:Just what I need... by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Funny, I hate going to crappy little stores in my small town, because going to WalMart gets my shopping done in one trip. Other people agree - that's why those small places went out of business. Those small business owners didn't provide what the public wanted, so they failed. WalMart did, so they succeed. Quit whining and build a better WalMart, and let me know when it's complete - I'll shop there instead. Don't tear down one of the largest employers in my town, though, 'cause their brown-and-serve rolls are better than the rolls at the grocer. :)

    28. Re:Just what I need... by pmz · · Score: 1

      Wal-Mart destroys local competitors, eliminating jobs. Wal-Mart puts the hammerlock on its suppliers, forcing them to continue finding ways to lower their costs.

      Labor laws and unions breed a complacency that is destroying this country. Recognizing Wal-Mart is merely recognizing the truth about where certain markets are going and that the USA is no longer the place for these things. It is up to those people displaced to find a new way in the world. It ain't easy, but it is better than living in some crack-job fantasy of trade restrictions and legislated demographics.

  3. Obligatory... by whiteranger99x · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Let's all hope that the laptop has hardware that is compatible with linux drivers =D!!!!

    eh? eh? uh oh....*dodges tomatoes*

    --
    Join the TWIT army now!
  4. walmart has great prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been shopping walmart.com for tech books for quite awhile (they are the cheapest)! This is good news, I wonder if they will be offering Linux on the laptops, or any other desktops!

    1. Re:walmart has great prices by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      They offer several Lindows, Lycoris, and SuSE preloaded desktops, if you didn't know. Myself, I'd build my own, but these would be GREAT for people who want a cheap, easy, and secure box (note to WalMart - Lindows runs as root - NOT SECURE!)

  5. We're rolling back your CPU cycles!!! by dswensen · · Score: 5, Funny

    So let me guess, instead of Clippy you have a little bouncing yellow smiley face that keeps darting in and changing the numbers on all your Excel documents?

    1. Re:We're rolling back your CPU cycles!!! by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      For one, I don't think that will happen. Wal-mart takes their customer relation very seriously

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    2. Re:We're rolling back your CPU cycles!!! by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Bitch.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    3. Re:We're rolling back your CPU cycles!!! by sharkey · · Score: 1
      Wal-mart takes their customer relation very seriously

      What Wal-mart do you go to?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  6. Re:Great! by Mantorp · · Score: 1
    Made in China?

    As opposed to all those US made laptops?

  7. Walmart = ?? by hypermike · · Score: 5, Funny
    The Umbrella Corporation.

    Bazing!

    --
    1. Re:Walmart = ?? by cjfoste · · Score: 1

      Maybe the "Great Value" laptops in conjuction with the bouncing smiley's will turn all of us in zombies who want nothing more than to pay the lowest prices turning Wal Mart into even more of a money hungry monopoly they are fast becoming.

    2. Re:Walmart = ?? by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      What the hell does Walmart have to be a monopoly on? Last I checked there were a few dozen grocery stores in this area, a handful of book stores, some furniture stores, a ton of clothing stores...

      So what the hell do they have a monopoly on?

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    3. Re:Walmart = ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that would be the Canopy group... owners of SCO.

    4. Re:Walmart = ?? by cjfoste · · Score: 1

      You should be aware of how large Wal-Mart really is.

      It posted $245 billion in sales in its most recent fiscal year -- nearly twice as much as General Electric Co. and almost eight times as much as Microsoft (LA Times).

      Its the largest corporation in the world.

      Wal Mart's decisions influence world wide economies! They are very big and powerful and it seems to only get bigger and bigger.

      Interesting statistic, if Dial (amongst others) decided not to sell their products in Wal Mart they would have to sell 10 times as much all the other stores.

      - Do some research on them, the facts will astonish you.

      Start Here:
      http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-walma rt23nov 23a,1,7637894.story

      There is an interesting flash animation of their growth on there, its like a virus spreading across the nation.

    5. Re:Walmart = ?? by cjfoste · · Score: 1

      Btw...if you read my first post it states...

      "like the hungry monopoly they are fast becoming."

      Meaning I didn't say they 'are' a monopoly, but implied they are becoming a monopoly.

  8. Re:Damn, I'm OLD. by mattjb0010 · · Score: 1, Funny

    I once walked into a department store, ctrl-alt-del'ed the winblowz screensaver (back in the days when you could), wrote a 2 line asm .com file to reboot the computer, added it to autoexec.bat, and rebooted. Endless rebooting fun, the look on the sales peoples' faces was priceless.

  9. Re:Damn, I'm OLD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was how to fuck with Kmart. I lost the file when my hard drive dies in '96, But I remember, bro =)

  10. Somewhat offtopic, but... PCs have gotten CHEAP! by Stile+65 · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's a neat link at the bottom of the article to another article about $200 being the magic number for PCs.

    I've always thought this would be a neat idea for corporations: Several fairly powerful servers, running everything from file sharing to groupware (on BSD or Linux, SMP, etc.). A bunch of cheap PCs with no hard drives and Knoppix-type CDs configured for the company's network. All files accessed via NFS, etc.

    Talk about a) inexpensive solution and b) easy support. The computers are throwaways, and you don't have to move data from a broken one to a new one. It's all on the servers. But the computers are still powerful enough to do plenty of processing on their own.

    Upgrades are a cinch - distribute new CDs to everyone.

    With $200 computers (how much cheaper would they be without hard drives?) it's more than possible.

    Hrm.

    --
    I claim first use of "Error No. 0B" - or "No. 0B error." It'll be the new ID 10T!
  11. I wonder if it will take off by Valar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They are rebranded machines from Asia, so expect about the same level of linux/*BSD/etc support as any other obscure lowest bidder import type of notebook (kludgy but improving). It will be interesting to see if this takes off though. Laptops are, for many people, more of a fashion accessory than a computing device (think marketroid/execubot wannabe gearheads). Walmart brand laptop wouldn't have the same fashion value as a "Ubertron Mega Wassus 90009".

    1. Re:I wonder if it will take off by JVert · · Score: 1

      At wallmart prices a laptop can go from a fashion accessory to a cheap alternative to dedicating a desk for the casual users.

    2. Re:I wonder if it will take off by CaptainMunchies · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ubertron Mega Wassus 90009

      Dammit! My 90008 is out of style!

      --
      Spam removed for the Internet's pleasure ...
    3. Re:I wonder if it will take off by cymen · · Score: 1

      They are rebranded machines from Asia...

      Wahoo! Just like Dell!

    4. Re:I wonder if it will take off by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Somehow, I seriously doubt the word "Wal*Mart" will appear on the machine itself... there's nothing stopping Wal*Mart from creating a made-up word like Ubertron to be their computer brand... they already do that in several places within the store by creating things such as Sam's Choice foods and Equate bathroom and medicine cabinet prodcuts.

    5. Re:I wonder if it will take off by mst76 · · Score: 1
      They are rebranded machines from Asia, so expect about the same level of linux/*BSD/etc support as any other obscure lowest bidder import type of notebook (kludgy but improving).
      The majority of brand name laptops today are rebranded machines from Asia.
    6. Re:I wonder if it will take off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it had traditionally been big-brand systems that have poor hardware support.

      Not sure whether this is still true, I gave up on PC notebooks because of the poor hardware support on anything except MSWin and got a PowerBook.

    7. Re:I wonder if it will take off by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      What, like Medion? I know they're a seperate company, but anyone want to bet they're under Aldi control? (BTW, their products ARE pretty cheap - $799 for a P4-2.6HT, 512MB RAM, DVDRW (forget whether it was +, -, or +-), 160GB HDD, wireless kb/mouse, then there's the USB tablet - $40 for an aiptek 12000u clone (linux drivers), and vnunet likes it) At least Medion makes stuff that's worth something (except for their first PC - only popular in Europe, but it made WAY too much noise - so much that aftermarket fan kits were made for it), unlike some of the Sam's Crap...

    8. Re:I wonder if it will take off by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      Normally, I'd agree with the parent. But I remember when Mary Kate & Ashley decided to go with Wal-Mart and were roundly pooh-pooh'd in the business world as having made a dumb decision. After all, teenage girls think Wal-Mart is dumb, that's their core demographic, therefore never the twain shall meet.

      Yet, the Olsen twins fortunes have been rising steadily since the deal.

      Wal-Mart isn't as dorky as it used to be. Let's face it, you don't sell $250B of stuff every year if nobody likes you.

    9. Re:I wonder if it will take off by michrech · · Score: 1

      You buy stuff from Wal*Mart, in the town I live, because Wal*Mart moved in, lowered their prices BIG TIME to kill off the KMart that WAS here, succeeded in killing the KMart, then moved to a larger building and raised their prices back to what they would have been with no competitors. The closest place to buy things other than the Wal*Mart is around 90 MILES away (I live near Kirksville, MO, and the closest town with big name stores *other* than Wal*Mart is Columbia, MO). If I wanted to go to a big name electronic store, I'd half to go to Kansas City - A roughly 3 hour drive - in one direction! - to find a Circuit City (Not sure if they have anything like Good Guys or Best Buy.. I know they have both in Omaha, NE, where my mother lives). We simply don't have any choice; anymore.

      I know I'm not the only one who isn't going to drive a 180 mile round trip just to grocery shop/get needed daily items. To expect me to do so is just stupid.

      --
      bork bork bork!
    10. Re:I wonder if it will take off by michrech · · Score: 1

      As a side note, I did not live in Kirksville when Wal*Mart moved in and killed the KMart. I moved here only a year or two after it happened and upon the locals here learning of my having moved from SoCal, it was all they could talk about. Something about having issues with what Wally-World did.. Heheheeh

      --
      bork bork bork!
  12. Luckly no Mom and Pop stores will be destroyed by jcrb · · Score: 1


    Of course I'm sure the locla Circuit City and COMPUSA will manage to come up with a suitable sob story. Anyone want to take bets on how long it is before one of these chains makes a press release about how Wallmart's action is "bad for the consumer and local computer stores......"

    Clearly we need a South Park episode about this..

    "Wallmark is bad m'kay..."

    --
    -jon
    1. Re:Luckly no Mom and Pop stores will be destroyed by spinspin · · Score: 1

      Expecting South Park to come out swinging at wall mart is probably putting too much faith in their integrity and political drive. Ever since the totally reactionary post sept. 11th Osama Bin Laden episode, I've held no torch for Trey Parker and Matt Stone as a force for good in america.

  13. Lindows or XP? by thanjee · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder if these will run Lindows or XP.

    Does this question really need to be asked? They will run FreeBSD of course! :p

    --
    Saying your OS is the best because more people use it is like saying MacDonalds make the best food
    1. Re:Lindows or XP? by globalar · · Score: 1

      If you have read and heard about Walmart's efficiency and demands for lower prices from its vendors, I think Lindows is just a tool. Specifically, a tool to force, gradually, to get Windows-bundled PCs to drop in price for Walmart's stores.

      I would imagine Walmart is simply waiting for Lindows to be a clear enough replacement for Windows, that they can afford to bargain much more effectively with lowering the price of the Wintel-PCs, and maybe ultimately Windows.

  14. Re:Damn, I'm OLD. by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 4, Funny
    I'm older than that. I remember going into Radio Shack when the TRS-80 was first introduced, writing a quick BASIC program:

    10 PRINT "Trash 80s suck!"
    20 GOTO 10

    running it and walking out. Ah, memories!

  15. Can't wait for the notebooks by GussT · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let me guess they have spiral binding and come with their own pencil!

    1. Re:Can't wait for the notebooks by eforhan · · Score: 1

      LOL

      I wish I had some moderator points right about now.
      ;-)

    2. Re:Can't wait for the notebooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sadly that is EXACTLY what i thought the article was talking about at first v_v'
      its late here in EST

    3. Re:Can't wait for the notebooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so do I

      -1 Offtopic

    4. Re:Can't wait for the notebooks by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Well...at least they would be Y10K compliant

      --
      What?
    5. Re:Can't wait for the notebooks by Herkum01 · · Score: 1

      It has two little nobs to move the cursor around and you have to shake it to reboot it.

  16. Yay! by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

    WalMart comes into a market and undercuts everyone. This can only be good, since lets face it everything is made in Asia anyway, so it's not like Americans are making any money on PCs. Maybe they can take on the 200% Dell markup.

    The down side is you can only buy one if you can place the order in Spanish :)

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    1. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... I guarantee that Dell don't make a 200% markup on laptops. Most laptops across the field will make 5-10% - maybe less, and Dell are cheap because of low inventory. Walmart will make money because they'll stick to a low model count and outsource support.

      Either way, 99% of laptop parts come from the Far East whatever model you buy. And with a vast product range they can subsidize against your groceries...

    2. Re:Yay! by Aardpig · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This can only be good...

      <sarcasm>I can't agree more; and I completely trust Walmart's religious convictions, and the decisions they make to censor their product lines based on these convictions.</sarcasm>

      Remember, America, the notion of free speech and free choice has meaning only so long as the citizenry has the ability excercise them. Without this ability, these rights become nothing more than wishful thinking on some pretty paper in a fancy library.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    3. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WalMart comes into a market and undercuts everyone.

      Walmart does a good job at undercutting other large chains. For example, Walmart has much better prices on the tires I use on my truck P235 75 R15, than NTB or Pep boys. But the local tire joints invariable have better prices than even the great Walmart. What happens is this, Walmart, NTB, Pep Boys and all of the local tire joints will put pression on national distributors, like Cooper, to give them all lower prices, the price war will continue to benefit the consumer.

      I love Walmart.

  17. Cheap Notebooks by Detritus · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I think there is a market for cheap notebooks, although I wouldn't call $750 cheap.

    I don't care if it isn't able to run the latest video games. I'd like to see a sturdy notebook computer that has good battery life and a price under $500.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:Cheap Notebooks by IM6100 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd like to see a sturdy notebook computer with a reflective grayscale display and a serious underclocked processor. In this day and age 'severely underclocked' could mean that it had a 400 MHz chip. A reflective grayscale display combined with 'underclocking' would give it one HELL of a lot longer battery life, and it'd give us geeks who care less about glitz a hell of a machine. I still cling to my Toshiba 2105, the last great grayscale 486 laptop.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    2. Re:Cheap Notebooks by CaptBubba · · Score: 1
      HA! Sturdyness will be suspect, just like about everything at wal-mart. Also, they don't have the tech support infrastructure that Dell, Apple, or any of the other laptop manufacturers have.

      Here's what they will be: Heavy, flimsy, laptops with short battery life that will take two months to be repaired when they break.

    3. Re:Cheap Notebooks by The+Snowman · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see a sturdy notebook computer that has good battery life and a price under $500.

      I just want something that I can sit in bed with and write code. Hold on, sorry. My wife tells me she wants one with a DVD-ROM so we can watch pr0n in the bedroom. It's always about pr0n, isn't it??? For $750 that's an expensive "marital aid" though.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    4. Re:Cheap Notebooks by tftp · · Score: 1

      If they are cheap I can live with whatever little sturdiness they got. Normally notebooks are not that much abused, it's occasional drops on the floor that are a concern. A Thinkpad will crack the plastic but works. This one will crack the plastic and stops working... not a big deal: at that price I can buy three cheap notebooks instead of two or three expensive ones. And if you drop an expensive notebook it still takes damage, and you will want to repair or replace it anyway.

    5. Re:Cheap Notebooks by yog · · Score: 1

      (who's the jerk who modded you flamebait? someone metamoderate this!)

      I'll go you one better. A sturdy notebook for $400 will be a killer. Forget Windows XP and Microsoft Works; just throw Debian and OOo and Mozilla on the thing with a recent kernel that supports lotsa USB devices and you've got a very useful tool.

      It doesn't have to be super lightweight or super screen, just portable and usable. I could live without DVD-RW but it should have about 40 gigs, 256 MB, 1024x768, two hours on a charge. Wireless ethernet is probably also a requirement. They could sell these into the high school and college market by the hundreds of thousands.

      I'd buy one in a flash!

      --
      it's = "it is"; its = possessive. E.g., it's flapping its wings.
    6. Re:Cheap Notebooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's always about pr0n, isn't it???
      Yes.
    7. Re:Cheap Notebooks by norweigiantroll · · Score: 1

      Amen to that. (Wireless ethernet isn't a requirement for me, though.) For $400, I'd be happy with 20 gigs as long as the processor was 1ghz or so.

      When I'm looking at laptops, I'm always frustrated that they have three things I don't want: a DVD drive (now most have a CD-RW, too), a modem, and of course, Windows XP (and probably Office and who knows what else), which I would overwrite anyway. But they're fairly good machines at good speeds, like 2ghz or so, for only $1000. I'm wondering, why can't they drop all that junk and sell it for $800?

    8. Re:Cheap Notebooks by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I was hoping for when I saw the article as well. The combination of a mid-range laptop at a fair price that was assured to be linux friendly would have been nice. But only working part time I really can't justify $750 for something I'd only use in a couple classes. A cheap $250 I might have though.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    9. Re:Cheap Notebooks by crucini · · Score: 1

      Yes! And make it withstand a 6 foot drop onto concrete. Lots of things, like handheld radios already meet this spec. Why not computers?

    10. Re:Cheap Notebooks by Alternate+Interior · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, when you can get a reburbished corporate class Thinkpad for ~ $500, a $750 Noname Celeron just doesn't have any appeal. Nor do I see how they could do an Athlon-M for $750. What about the Duron, was there a mobile version of that?

    11. Re:Cheap Notebooks by wilper · · Score: 1

      I agree, a low power portable with a good keyboard and batteries that last a days worth of coding, writing, e-book reading or (Insert your prefered mostly idle activity here).

      I don't really care if it is 100Mhz and has a monochrome screen, as long as it is fast enough to play mp3s from the local storage I'm fine. A serial port, USB and ethernet dito would be nice too.

    12. Re:Cheap Notebooks by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      If you're going to ditch the FDD, it's CD-RW. People also want to watch DVDs. Modems? Keep in mind, most people use dial-up. Windows XP? Everyone knows how to use that.

      BTW, you don't have to ditch the modem or WinXP to get a 2GHz Celeron box from Dell for $800... The modem is $15 tops (it's a Conexant, after all...), and that's probably what they're paying for XP Home, too. Myself, I want a CD-RW (maybe DVD), no OS, the modem for if I'm in a hotel somewhere and need to connect, 1.3GHz Pentium M, wifi, all that good shit, and for $1000. As it is, I'm stuck paying $1220 for that, except with XP Pro (minus $279 if I do it right, though...)

    13. Re:Cheap Notebooks by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      They're selling a XP-M 1600+ for $898, and that's got some features I'm sure they'd skimp on... The XP-M is a lower performance, lower cost alternative to the Pentium M at low clock speeds, and a higher performance, slightly higher cost alternative to the Pentium 4-M at high clock speeds.

  18. Re:Somewhat offtopic, but... PCs have gotten CHEAP by Gyan · · Score: 1


    Umm, such Network PCs were talked about before, hasn't really caught on...

  19. Dude: You're getting a Walmart! by taj · · Score: 2, Funny


    Thank You.

  20. Re:Regurgitated Google News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  21. Walmart and world domination by NightWulf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is it me or by 2025 everything will be Walmart. I can see this orwellian type world, where 20 story tall Walmart stores dominate the landscape. And giant city sized Walmart's where the peons (everybody) work, like the middle age vassals all over again. Your overlord will be Baron Von Mildred, the silver haired 400 year old woman who greets you everyday with a smile and a cat o'nine tails. Gonna be fun!

    1. Re:Walmart and world domination by erpbridge · · Score: 1

      Ya know, now that you say that...

      Who will buy who? Will Microsoft buy Wal-Mart, or Wal-mart buy Microsoft? It's only a matter of time until the two come at each other now.

    2. Re:Walmart and world domination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WalMart has a hell of a lot more money & stock value than Microsoft, walmart would squash microsoft like a bug in a hostile takeover

    3. Re:Walmart and world domination by Bradee-oh! · · Score: 1

      Heard sometime in San Angeles, 2025 to explain things to a visitor from another time - "Now all restaurants are Walmart."

      --
      "This is Zombo Com, and welcome to you who have come to Zombo Com" - www.zombo.com
    4. Re:Walmart and world domination by tftp · · Score: 1

      To answer your question just think how many people from all sectors of society - and how often - buy from Microsoft vs. from Wal-Mart. Also think which company sells products that you *literally* can not live without. Also think which company sells generally decent stuff at bargain prices. Then you get the answer.

    5. Re:Walmart and world domination by anagama · · Score: 1

      • Also think which company sells products that you *literally* can not live without.

      I buy from *neither* and I'm alive and well. Ask yourself this: how good a deal will Wal-Mart be when they have 90+% market share? Just look at MS for you're answer. Personally, I think diversity in the market place is worth an extra quarter on a gallon of milk. When the diversity is all gone, everyone will have to pay an extra dollar - consider it an investment in future savings.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    6. Re:Walmart and world domination by tftp · · Score: 1
      Ask yourself this: how good a deal will Wal-Mart be when they have 90+% market share?

      They are not a monopolist as MS, they are reseller. MS erected a huge barrier of entry, and even qualified participants (RedHat, Suse etc.) have problems climbing over it. However anyone can open a store and sell the same goods as Wal-Mart sells, for less or for whatever he pleases. There is no barrier of entry, and that is one crucial difference here.

      And if you say that Wal-Mart gets to 99% of market share being the lowest cost provider, and *then* ups the price... the market will react, and the smaller merchants will fill the gap in no time. I would not go to a big store to pay more if I can get the same thing next door and for less! The key here again is "the same thing" - and Wal-Mart can not possibly monopolize resale of everything. MS focuses on one product, and that is their own product, so they can do that. Wal-Mart is a different story.

      When the diversity is all gone, everyone will have to pay an extra dollar

      I'd rather open a store and start selling milk (a locally produced product!) for less. I personally know people who would do that. It is much easier to own a shop than to hack C++ code.

    7. Re:Walmart and world domination by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      I'm just waiting for the day they drive prices so far down that paying for individual items is too expensive. Oh yes, at some point employees will be too expensive too. Just walk in, grab what you need, ignore the voice directing you to the automated sales counter.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    8. Re:Walmart and world domination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They DO sell products you cannot live without (they sell food). That doesn't mean you have to buy them there.

      If you want to know why Sam Walton died the richest man in the world, you don't have to go into a Wal-Mart. Go to a Macy's or a Lord & Taylor. I'd rather buy inexpensive low quality junk than expensive low quality junk.

    9. Re:Walmart and world domination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a look at this comment and its parent. It should answer the question.

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=86691&cid=75 41 520.

      Good day.

    10. Re:Walmart and world domination by pmz · · Score: 1

      Is it me or by 2025 everything will be Walmart.

      Only if Wal-Mart can buy all the highways, warehouses, and real estate everwhere. Retail-middleman is simply one domain where a monopoly can't exist for long. Also, manufacturers could create alliances against Wal-Mart if things got really bad.

  22. This is a Good Thing by Ridgelift · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "For the same reason Dell and Gateway can get TVs, there's no reason Wal-Mart can't get computers," Baker said.

    I really hope Wal-Mart decides to sell notebooks with both Lindows and Windows. It will never be mentioned in the press, but many people would buy the cheaper of the two, then chuck Lindows and replace it with a pirated copy of Windows.

    Microsoft will no doubt fight this tooth and nail. They know that seeing two identical machines side by side in Wal-Mart, people will see how expensive Windows really is. Then there will be more reason to mainstream more Linux software, especially games.

    1. Re:This is a Good Thing by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 1

      They know that seeing two identical machines side by side in Wal-Mart, people will see how expensive Windows really is.

      Do you know how much Walmart will be paying for an OEM version of WinXP? I'm going to guess with their buying power: not much.

      The whole "Microsoft tax" is way overblown.

      --
      Forget the whales - save the babies.
    2. Re:This is a Good Thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      I really hope Wal-Mart decides to sell notebooks with both Lindows and Windows. It will never be mentioned in the press, but many people would buy the cheaper of the two, then chuck Lindows and replace it with a pirated copy of Windows.


      Maybe not as many people as you think.

      I've purchased a few of the lindows boxes, and I chucked lindows before I even finished unboxing them, but I didn't replace it with windows. I replaced it with debian. And I've been very happy with them since.

    3. Re:This is a Good Thing by Ridgelift · · Score: 1

      Do you know how much Walmart will be paying for an OEM version of WinXP? I'm going to guess with their buying power: not much.

      And how much will they be paying for the hardware? Not much either. The "Microsoft tax" is not way overblown. I run Linux; why should I pay an extra ANYTHING if I don't want it? If I have to pay for something I don't use, it's a tax.

      And to restate my point, if Joe Consumer sees two identical notebooks, where the one with Windows is more and the one with Linux is less and they know their cousin can throw the latest version of Windows on it, people will buy the Linux notebook.

      I didn't say it was pretty. I didn't say it was ethical. I just said this is a good thing because consumers will _see_ the cost of Windows up front, which right now is padded in the price of all the notebooks bought.

    4. Re:This is a Good Thing by fastgood · · Score: 1

      I really hope Wal-Mart decides to sell notebooks with both Lindows and Windows.

      If Wal-Mart were smart enough to market just a half-dozen total models per year,
      they might hit critical mass of 100K units sales each -- and would not be a future
      support nightmare when it comes to lack of drivers due to low individual volume.

    5. Re:This is a Good Thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they will see that the laptop with Windows costs $20 more.
      Hey Martha, this computer doesn't run any software that I have ever heard of, and this one (for 20 dollars more) runs everything. I think I'll skip the beer this weekend and buy the computer that makes the most sense.

    6. Re:This is a Good Thing by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 2, Informative

      Do you know how much Walmart will be paying for an OEM version of WinXP? I'm going to guess with their buying power: not much.

      You'd be mistaken. Compare these two very similar machines:

      1.2 GHz Duron, 30 GB, 128 MB, No O/S: $199.98

      1.3 GHz Duron, 40 GB, 128 MB, Windows XP home: $308.00

      Looks like Walmart has to pay about $80 for the OS. Despite their buying power, Microsoft clearly has even more monopoly power.

      Interesting side note: it was very, very difficult to find two models offered by Walmart similar enough to factor out the cost of Windows. I seriously doubt this is coincidence, I suspect that Microsoft still has illegal contractual restrictions in place to make it difficult for customers to assess the true cost of Windows.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    7. Re:This is a Good Thing by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      They'll be paying $99 for Lindows (look at their Lindows vs. Lycoris boxes - for their worst config, the Lindows box costs $299, the Lycoris box costs $239, and wait! Lycoris costs $39!) and most likely LESS for Windows (if it's XP Home, most whiteboxers sell it to users for $99).

    8. Re:This is a Good Thing by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Actually, they'll cost about the same if WalMart's smart - Lindows costs $99, and WalMart sells it to the users at $99 on the box, and most whiteboxers sell XP Home for $99 on the box. Besides, some will also ask their computer guy in the family what is the best deal, and said computer guy will say the Lindows box (if it's $20 cheaper), then load either his favorite distro or a Win2K/XP CD off of Kazaa or something... Some people will also see $750 for the Lindows box, and $770 for the Windows box, and think the $750 one is a better deal (which it is, if you pirate) - and get screwed when they find out it can't run Windows software worth a shit (it's WINE, what did you expect?)...

    9. Re:This is a Good Thing by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      To go from 20GB with Lycoris to 30GB with no OS, is the same price. Lycoris is $99. That means a 20GB with no OS would be $100.98.

      BTW, did you try building your own?

      Microtel SYSBB503 for Duron with CD-ROM (No OS):
      1.3 GHz Duron
      128MB PC133 SDRAM
      40GB Ultra DMA HDD
      $341.63

      Microtel Windows XP PC for Duron:
      1.3 GHz Duron
      128MB PC133 SDRAM
      40GB Ultra DMA HDD
      $441.63

      Of course, I could have told you that from the base prices (case, optical drive, and mobo): $168.00 for no OS, $268.00 for XP Home.

    10. Re:This is a Good Thing by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      The problem is that Wal-Mart knows the power of the "absolute" low price. No matter how large Wal-Mart's buying power may be it's still not bigger than Dell's or HP's (when it comes to computers). In fact, the only way to trump Dell's price is to offer a machine without an OS. It seems to be working too. Wal-Mart.com's OS-less and Linux PCs are their biggest sellers. Besides, even if the Microsoft tax were as low as $20, that's 10% of the retail price of Wal-Mart.com's low-end machines. Wal-Mart didn't get where they are today by overlooking a 10% markup.

      The fact of the matter is that Microsoft's pricetag is a significant part of the price in a low-end machine. Not to mention the fact that operating systems are clearly a business where there are some room for "increased efficiencies." Heck, Microsoft's profit margin for their OS division is over 80%.

      My guess is that Wal-Mart smells blood in the water.

    11. Re:This is a Good Thing by Enucite · · Score: 1

      That means a 20GB with no OS would be $100.98.

      And where do I sign up for this deal?
      $100.98 for a 1.2GHz Duron with 128MB SDRAM and a 20GB hard drive and no OS?

      I think you're calculations are a little off.

    12. Re:This is a Good Thing by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Well, I did some further looking, and WalMart isn't paying $99 for Lycoris anymore. They're paying less than $14.48 (that's with a faster CD-RW drive than the no OS box with the closest specs).

  23. Maybe a Clevo? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Alienware and Sager both already sell Clevo laptops as their own house brand (after neon spraypaint, etc.). Pretty good units, so a Walmart-branded one might be an OK computer.

    There are already comments whining about Walmart quality - how much differentiation is there among the vast majority of PC's today anyhow? Sure there's always premium gear, but most of the stuff for sale in stores, whether it says WalMart, HP, or Dell on it is all low-end gear designed for price, and will probably last out its useful lifecycle.

    It is surprising how WalMart is making the high-tech play; netflix, itunes, now laptops, yet they've skipped consumer electronics (no walmart-branded TV's, DVD players, etc.). Their other areas for house brands are clothing and pharmaceuticals - seems like they target areas where they think there is alot of profit, and try to take some fat out of it.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Maybe a Clevo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the good folks at Clevo responded with a hearty

      HTTP/1.1 |oA3/4O|

      (actually it included a couple pipe symbols and a number of symbols I don't even know the name of (and am too lazy to look up). In other words, the site is hosed.

    2. Re:Maybe a Clevo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Maybe not a Clevo...

      Of the 3 my work bought 18 months ago, one has been returned for repair (new mobo) 3 times, one has been returned twice and the other is in the bin.

      At least they were cheap I guess...

    3. Re:Maybe a Clevo? by The+Snowman · · Score: 1

      ...seems like they target areas where they think there is alot of profit, and try to take some fat out of it.

      They do this even without house brands. For example, take a look through their medical/hygiene aisles. Even their name brand stuff is cheaper. Although I will say that Sam's Choice cola tastes like ass and doesn't go nearly as well with whiskey as Coke.

      In case you live in a hole, Sam's is owned by Wal-Mart and they sell a lot of the same house brands.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    4. Re:Maybe a Clevo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wal-Mart hasn't exactly skipped the consumer electronics. They stock the shelves with "Durabrand", which is "exclusive" to Wal-Mart, and sell higher priced units from Sony, etc. beside them. This applies to TVs, CD players, and the like.

    5. Re:Maybe a Clevo? by yerricde · · Score: 1

      so a Walmart-branded one might be an OK computer.

      Where does Radiohead enter into this?

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    6. Re:Maybe a Clevo? by Kojo · · Score: 1

      If the Clevo page looks like gibberish, it's because you don't have Chinese language fonts installed on your machine...or you don't have you browser set to "universal auto-detect" for different encodings.

      I got the following Chinese charachters:

      &#20282;&#26381;&#22120;&#22826;&#2453 7;
      (you'll have to paste the Unicode into a page and look at it with your browser...Slash doesn't seem to like the Characters...)which, according to bablefish, is Chinese for "The server too is busy".

      I almost fell down laughing...

    7. Re:Maybe a Clevo? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Wal-Mart hasn't exactly skipped the consumer electronics. They stock the shelves with "Durabrand", which is "exclusive" to Wal-Mart, and sell higher priced units from Sony, etc. beside them. This applies to TVs, CD players, and the like.

      Ah, interesting. We don't have them at our WalMart - I wonder if you're in a test market or it's regional, or our 'mini-walmart' just doesn't have them, like half the other stuff you need. ;)

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  24. isn't it obvious? by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

    Lindows XP
    and in microsoft style- BETA release 3, but we're calling it a final release.

    -Grump

    --
    Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
  25. Great, a censored laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Just what I've been looking for from the morality-dictating retail king.

    I will expect features like:
    -Built-in browser prevents users from viewing maximmagazine.com, stuffmagazine.com and fhmus.com.
    -Built-in MP3 software doesn't play songs with profanity in them, and will not play Sheryl Crow's second album at all.

  26. Re:Go XP by lowtekneq · · Score: 0, Troll

    If they went with XP the price would go up by at least $100, and all of the things you mentioned are much easier to do on OS X (yes I'm well aware that it won't run on x86) than god awfull Windows XP.

    --
    Carpe meam simiam!
  27. OS? i don't need no steeenkin' OS by Gurudev+Das · · Score: 3, Funny

    everybody is interested in seeing Windows or Linux on one of these machines, but how about no OS at all! no crashes, no bugs, heck it won't even start up providing one of the most secure environments you can get :)

  28. Hard to compete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is immensely difficult to compete with a corporation that gets massive amounts of government assistance in tax incentives and loans. The idea that Walmart won in the marketplace isn't true. They beg local governments for preferntial treatment in everything from tax treatment to land zoning. These are the reason Walmarts prices can get so low. Corporate welfare for the largest retailer in the world.

    How quickly we have all forgotten, from just weeks ago, Walmart's hiring of illegal aliens too.

    1. Re:Hard to compete by nolife · · Score: 1

      I agree with the illegal alien part but the rest of your story is complete bull. Have you ever been to a city/county board meeting in your area? Walmart gets no more pull then then any large developer.

      10 years ago in my county, they rezoned 1000's of farm land to support high end "luxury homes". The basis was that the land value would go up and get people to the county with more money which would cause the tax burden to shift and money supply to go up. Guess what, my county taxes have gone up every year since, traffic is terrible and a decent percentage of school classrooms and buildings now have a hitch and wheels. I'm still waiting for that "benefit" to come around.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    2. Re:Hard to compete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever try to get something on the shelves at Wal Mart? It ain't the tax incentives that get you that motor oil for $1 less than others. It's the fact they pressure the fuck out of their suppliers until they are making literally pennies. Knowing Wal Mart, the laptop suppliers are probably making $2 a unit. If they're lucky.

    3. Re:Hard to compete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      (same AC)

      Yes, I used to be on a city commission and needed to go to most of the council meetings. I've seen how local governments can get tricked by the idea that corporate welfare can actually create good jobs. I've seen it with areas being rezoned for some new condos (simiarly to your situation) and to giving preferential tax treatement for building a large do-it-yourself store (let's call it L for short).

      The L's people had this presentation that a tax break for them would create hundres of new high-paying jobs. It was crap, like all these deals are.

      They give an unfair competition to large corporations over small stores. The L went up, undercut local businesses because they were allowed to have larger profit margins from lower taxes, and killed local hardware stores. By the time I moved away, the L was employing about a hundred people, but four other stores each closed up taking away at least that many jobs in the process. Also, with no more competition, there was no check on L's service and prices. Nobody can tell for sure how this impacted the local landscape, since it pure guesswork, but I can tell you that L is not getting any better or cheaper. I hear they are actually having a hard time keeping a story that big open now.

      Walmart just received government assistance to build a new supercenter too. It is happening across the US.

      Wal-Mart Collapses U.S. Cities and Towns
      Despite all this, many states and communities are using taxpayers' money to finance subsidies to Wal-Mart, to come in and rape them.

      In 1999, it was reported that in Olivette, Missouri, a developer received a tax incentive of up to $38.9 million for a construction project including a Wal-Mart and a Sam's Club--more than a third of the projected total cost of the project. In 1998, it was reported that the city of Chesterfield, Missouri was supplying $25.5 million in tax incentives toward the construction of a $100 million-plus mall, anchored by a Wal-Mart. In 2001, Ohio approved $10 million in tax credits and other assistance for Wal-Mart to build two distribution centers and an eyeglass-manufacturing facility.


      Proposed ordinance in San Diego takes aim at Wal-Mart Supercenters
      One report, released this week by the Center on Policy Initiatives, questioned the benefits derived from public subsidies given to a 1998 retail redevelopment project in College Grove, which was anchored by a Wal-Mart. The project, the Marketplace at the Grove, received $13.4 million in public money and assistance, $9.5 million of which went to Wal-Mart, according to the study.


      Denver officials are deciding whether to give Wal-Mart $10 million of our tax money so Wal-Mart can build a Supercenter at Alameda Square Shopping Center.

      Just read up on the big-box closures all over the country now. Many of these cities are making the same mistakes again, gives huge incentives for people to now come into a story that Walmart has closed up after giving Wal mart incentives to build the store in the first place.

      Many of these places cannot support a place like Walmart and it is no surprise when Walmart closes up after a couple of years later, after driving local stores out of business.
    4. Re:Hard to compete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (same AC)

      They wouldn't have that much pressure on suppliers if they were not able to open supercenters, with little chance of losing money from all the government incentive, then close the place up after driving the locals out of business. This makes wholesale suppliers dependand on Walmart since nobody else is around to buy from them. Walmart's ability to grow is tied to the little chance of loss it has. Even if a store is an entire failure, much of the downside is absorbed by local taxpayers.

      Also, place that suspend collecting taxes or effectively give Walmart cost-free buildings allow Walmart to run a supercenter with much lower overhead than the shop across the street that is paying for their own building and has to actually pay taxes. This allows Walmart to cut prices even lower than they could otherwise.

    5. Re:Hard to compete by MrWa · · Score: 1
      Considering a lot of Slashdot readers live in California, I'm all for Wal-Mart being able to hire illegal aliens. They can get a driver's license here in CA, so it would be even better if they can get a job to make enough money to pay for car insurance!

    6. Re:Hard to compete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Have you ever been to a city/county board meeting in your area?
      Yes I have, this week to be precise, and it was specifically regarding a planned Wal-Mart. I live in Hernando, MS and they've just bought our aldermen with promises of tax revenue. A new Wal-Mart will be going up despite much protest by residents.
      Walmart gets no more pull then then any large developer.
      Bullshit. The amount of sales tax generated by a Wal-Mart makes it nearly impossible for any city council or county commission to turn down.

      My brother lives in Memphis, TN, just north of here across the state line. Within 5 miles of his house, there are 4 Wal-Marts... 2 of them open, 2 abandoned. There would be 3 abandoned except that after lying vacant for more than a year, one of them was finally rented out by Bass Pro Shops and a hardware store. And they are in the middle of building another one, along with a SAM'S Club, less than 2 miles from one of the ones they abandoned.

      I guarantee you that if this Wal-Mart is built here in Hernando, it will be closed within 5 years. An abandoned, paved, 25-acre plot of wasteland, chewed up and spit out by Wal-Mart after they decide to put up another one across town somewhere. Check out the article I linked to, there are already 3 Wal-Mart's in Desoto County. That's right, the article says 2. That's because they built 2 in Southaven and abandoned one.

      FUCK WAL-MART.
    7. Re:Hard to compete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another big bonus in bringing a Walmart to your local municipality is this, there aren't many $8.00/hr jobs that a high school drop out can get. There are some, but not many. Even fewer still than come with the potential for medical benefits and a retirement plan.

      Walmart may be imperfect, but they are not all bad either. I shop there because on so many items, they have the best prices around. I don't mind if they are given a tax immunity deal for a couple of years, in the end the municipality wins out. All of the people who live there and work at Walmart will pay taxes that they otherwise would not have. When the tax immunity ends, they municipality will gain additional revenue that they wouldn't have without making the deal.

      More jobs = less crime, so less spending on police is required. Like I said, Walmart may be imperfect, their music selection may suck ass, but they're not all bad.

    8. Re:Hard to compete by globalar · · Score: 1

      In more wealthy counties in the US, the county executives can be very particular and unreasonable about their land for large retailers. There is questioning and ultimate delay to expand an existing building because of codes X and Z, or some other meaningless detail. Never mind there is a parking lot there that the business owns, remains empty 24/7, and this is a commerical area (so no homes or anything nearby). In the end, the county has to be haggled - literally the law is no measure. It all comes down to deal-making at the table. Public interest? One would like to think so, but if this were the case, the deal-making would probably be more transparent.

  29. Here in the UK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It'd be called an Asda laptop which - trust me here - is way better than say, a Lidl or a Spar laptop...

    1. Re:Here in the UK... by Gleng · · Score: 1

      A Lidl laptop would rule.

      It would cost about 5 quid, but would be made of broken Spanish parts, run Windows ME and give you leg cancer.

      It would no doubt be favourable to a Happy Shopper laptop though.

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
    2. Re:Here in the UK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bet you work for HP.

    3. Re:Here in the UK... by wackybrit · · Score: 1

      LIDL were selling laptops recently.

      600, Pentium IV 2.4Ghz, 40GB HD, 256MB RAM, smallish screen, but I know a few people who got them and they were over the moon with what they got for the .

      I do believe there was a catch, however.. like no CD drive or something.

    4. Re:Here in the UK... by Gleng · · Score: 1

      Bizarre. Last time I was in the UK, all Lidl sold were things like really nasty beer and watery pies. They did do a line of really nice biscuits as I recall though.

      If the laptops have a Lidl logo on them, I'd pick one up for the novelty value ;)

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
  30. Re:Go XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    1) Windows OEM price is $20 for XP Home, $35 for XP Professional Full Edition.

    2) MacOS and "cheaper" in the same post sound like oxymoron. Steve Jobs gets a $1M raise, so Apple suckers better buy overpriced iPods, or the company is the dumpster.

  31. Re:Great! by slowbad · · Score: 1

    As opposed to all those US made laptops?

    Good point -- I would prefer a Beijing, China computer to one
    designed/specified/built in Bentonville, Ark. by Wal-Martian leaders

  32. Hopefully Walmart won't get locked into a windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    only contract in the US like the other computer sellers.

    If Walmart were to start selling laptops without a microsoft tax on them, I'd be taking a look at them.

  33. $750 cheap?!? by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    They already carry a notebook computer for $799. It's a Northgate 1 Ghz Celeron, 14" display and DVD drive, running Windows XP Home Edition:

    http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.gsp?produ ct _id=2416516&cat=3951&type=19&dept=3944&path=0%3A39 44%3A3951#long_descr

    Not much of a savings if they bring out their brand laptop, IMO.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    1. Re:$750 cheap?!? by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Correction, it's a VIA C3 1Ghz processor.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    2. Re:$750 cheap?!? by Praetor11 · · Score: 1

      Why would you possibly buy something like that when you can get a Dell laptop for 799 that has a 2.3 GHz P4 Celeron with a ton more stuff.....oh and an included 2MP camera and ok printer.....

    3. Re:$750 cheap?!? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Big difference. They're both Socket 370 (well, the C3 is also in EBGA), but the Celery is MUCH faster (it's also MUCH hotter, though - OTOH, not bad in comparison to a Pentium 4)...

    4. Re:$750 cheap?!? by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      That is true. However, since the C3 based laptop is already within spitting distance of that $750 estimated price tage, it is possible that Walmart may do what plenty already do, such as purchase bulk Chinese imports, slap their own case badge on it, and claim it as their own.

      Unfortunately, that may also mean they will use the C3.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    5. Re:$750 cheap?!? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Actually, they are. It's Arima, and the only laptops of theirs that I can actually get info on are Pentium M-based laptops, but the C|Net article said that it would be either an Athlon XP-M or Celeron CPU in these things.

  34. Re:Go XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    XP does come with a spell checker, perhaps you should reconsider.

    Nah, go back to suggesting using Macs (non-monitor boxes start at, what, $1800 or so to compete with the mentioned $300 WalMart boxes?) where they're perfectly appropriate.

  35. FUD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is well known that OEM licenses for Windows can go as low as $10. Only someone who is 1) stupid, 2) naive, or 3) a liar would posit that the full retail price of Windows that you see at Best Buy is actually added to a system price from someonelike Dell.

    1. Re:FUD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " It is well known that OEM licenses for Windows can go as low as $10."

      By whom is this "fact" well-known?

      I'd moderate you as "troll", but you're not worth the bullet.

  36. Yknow by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 1

    I question whether Wal-Mart won't become the next target of a government anti-trust violation.

    1. Re:Yknow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they wont:

      They are the biggest private sector employer.
      Tons of ordinary people shop there.
      Their prices are incredible, whereever a SuperStore(Walmart+groceries) opens, grocery prices in the area drop 20%.

      If you fuck with them you are going to have a shitload of people pissed off at you.

      Oh, and they have an excellent position on unionization.

    2. Re:Yknow by tftp · · Score: 1

      Do they have any monopoly on anything whatsoever? I don't think so. It is not illegal to sell for less.

  37. Re:Damn, I'm OLD. by IM6100 · · Score: 1

    A better program is:

    10 A$=""
    20 A$=A$+INKEY$
    30 PRINT A$;
    40 GOTO 20

    As far as I know, this short program makes the best simple textmode interactive 'screen dazzler'. Fill it with words and CR's and a few control-Gs and you've got a swirly mess that catches the eye.

    I've used it for stream-of-conciousness typing excercizes. Works best on as slow a machine as you can get it to run on. A 386SX-16 or (better yet) an 8088 or '286 machine is fine.

    Not sure if it works on my TRS-80 Model 100, which doesn't have batteries in it at the moment.

    --
    A Good Intro to NetBS
  38. won't work by b17bmbr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    most people who purchase laptops are not purchasing their first machine. onw, where most people who buy the emachines $399 at best buy, or the microtel (?) special at wal-mart for $199 are not going to jump on a $799 laptop. in some markets, price is everything, like gasoline. but in some markets, there are other intangible factors. not the least of course is the fact that going into most laptop type environs (offices, coffee shops, college classrooms, etc.) there will be a stigma.

    let me give you an example. in william grieder's book "secrets of the temple" about the federal reserve, (great book), he tells the story of bluefish. now, for those of you who don't kow much about bluefish, it is plentiful on the east coast, but not the best eating fish. but, when bluefish prices were higher, it sold more. as it price dropped, it actually sold less. why? well, it became a "cheap" fish. when it's price went back up, its sales did too. with the laptops, apple is selling tons, and they are not the cheapest. i don't think wal-mart will sell lots of laptops. people are looking for something a little more. for me, the clincher on the ibook was the screen. i couldn't deal with the cheaper laptop screens. my guess is that most laptop buyers are a little more discriminatory.

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    1. Re:won't work by a+whoabot · · Score: 1

      A fellow skeptic of the Fed here as well? Whenever I read about it my blood boils...

    2. Re:won't work by bfields · · Score: 1
      in some markets, price is everything, like gasoline. but in some markets, there are other intangible factors. not the least of course is the fact that going into most laptop type environs (offices, coffee shops, college classrooms, etc.) there will be a stigma.

      If you really hang out with people who would think less of you if you were seen with a possession that wasn't heavily advertised and expensive, then you need to find some new friends.

      --Bruce Fields

    3. Re:won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen the people who shop at Walmart? I have to say that fashion is not their first (or second or third) concern.

    4. Re:won't work by b17bmbr · · Score: 1

      it's not about hanging out with superficial people. if you walk into an office environ, you want to be taken seriously. and yes, it sometimes others around yoy matter.

      --
      My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
  39. I say this in all seriousness by Monkelectric · · Score: 2, Informative

    (And as a Walmart Employee) Walmart has to be stoped.

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    1. Re:I say this in all seriousness by zoid.com · · Score: 0, Troll

      >All I know about Bush is I had a job when Clinton was president.

      And as soon as bush got into office you lost your job? That's really strange. Did you ever think that it's the stuff Clinton did prior to Bush that caused the problems?

    2. Re:I say this in all seriousness by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

      Nope, the problems started w/ the tax cuts, and repeated tax cuts have failed to solve anything. Oooh oooh, I know, let's have MORE tax cuts!

      9/11 changed everything!

      --
      [o]_O
    3. Re:I say this in all seriousness by minus_273 · · Score: 0, Troll

      stoped. -- All I know about Bush is I had a job when Clinton was president.

      With spelling like that, it's no wonder you dont have a job.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    4. Re:I say this in all seriousness by zoid.com · · Score: 1

      I really hate to say it but you are an Idiot. The tax cuts are what's getting us out of this mess. How in the hell is paying more taxes going to help the economy?

    5. Re:I say this in all seriousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Amazing. You know, it's incredibly rare for a tax-cut to eliminate a private-sector job.

      More likely, you lost your job because you are, among other things, an economically illiterate crackbaby.

      -Rufus

    6. Re:I say this in all seriousness by indianajones428 · · Score: 1



      So, which position is yours?

      --
      When a thing has been said, and said well, have no scruple. Take it and copy it. --Anatole France
    7. Re:I say this in all seriousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He could get a job proofreading story postings on Slashdot. That is, if the blind, illiterate hedgehog ever retires.

      -Rufus

    8. Re:I say this in all seriousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Walmart is not the problem, the problem is the people who shop there ignoring, or not caring about the consequences of their actions.

      If more people considerd their actions, instead of taking the path of least resitance, the world would be a much better place.

    9. Re:I say this in all seriousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I've been getting the biggest bonuses of my life and making more money than ever after Bush became President. (coding professionally since 1988)

    10. Re:I say this in all seriousness by itchy92 · · Score: 1

      IANAE (I am not an economist), but tax cuts are a temporary solution. Taxes fund the government who, right now, is spending *a lot* of money. While it does help stimulate the consumer market, it also drives up the national deficit. The first couple of tax cuts were sufficient, they just weren't given enough time to take effect. Now it's just driving the US up in debt.
      At any rate, back to the topic at hand...

      --
      Slashdot: News for nerds. Stuff tha-- MICRO$OFT IS THE DEVIL!!1
    11. Re:I say this in all seriousness by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 1

      It's hard to understand that because you first have to show that the prevailing tax rate has any effect on the business cycle.

      It doesn't. I know someone personally who was all set to get his PhD in economics with the assumption that business cycles are driven by the tax rate. He got all the way to the end, and then someone asked him about his assumption. He checked into it, found that the business cycle isn't linked to the tax rate, and he had to throw out all of his work.

      So, please retire the bogus argument that the tax cut has anything to do with the current recovery. There's a lot of reasons for it, and I'm not going to go into who is responsible for it, but it's definitely not the tax break that's doing it.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    12. Re:I say this in all seriousness by z4ce · · Score: 1

      If tax cuts have nothing to do with economic growth then ALL free-market economic models need to be rethought. The current models of economy are based on the fact that people respond to incentives.

      That is, if you offer somebody more they will do some amount more. They will take more risks.

      Now let's take two scenarios, a .20 tax rate and a .80 percent tax rate. I'm using huge differences just to make the difference really clear.

      Now let's say I'm considering a new business. If the business fails I lose $300,000. Now let's say if I'm successful(%50) I get net income of $1m. If the tax rate is .20 I get $800,000. If the tax rate is .8 I get $200,000.

      Obviously, in the later case I'm not interested in this project. However, it is a good project and would have tended to bring economic benefit. But it didn't take place.

      If your friend found that the tax rate has nothing to do with the economy, he should have published that! If he could show rigorously that is true, he would flip modern economics on its head. However, I strongly believe people DO respond to taxes.

      Think of it like this, "I am I willing to spend an hour at work to get a box of corn flakes?" "Am I willing to work an hour to get a nice night out?" This is the how the tax rate will affect peoples decisions. Oh yeah, and the richest coutry in the world (GDP/capita) would be Switzerland, which also has some of the lowest taxes in the world...

    13. Re:I say this in all seriousness by line.at.infinity · · Score: 1

      So government being able to hire less people is good for the economy? Is putting the future generations in debt also good?

    14. Re:I say this in all seriousness by LenE · · Score: 1

      Your friend's view was too narrow in focus.

      Which tax rates was he examining? Tariffs, personal tax, corporate tax? How about the taxes of global trading partners? Economic growth is a trailing indicator, and job growth trails that even more.

      Since the US has been off of the gold standard, and ignoring major events such as world wars, the decrease of tax rates (personal and corporate) has preceded every economic boom period. The few doldrums we have had were preceded by personal tax increases, outside events (OPEC, asian meltdown) and general stupidity (dot.bomb).

      -- Len

    15. Re:I say this in all seriousness by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      "How in the hell is paying more taxes going to help the economy?"

      Because the people will not stop asking the govt to make roads, ensure law and order, pay farm subsidies, pay logging subsidies, pay for their schools and to make sure the interest on their mortgage is tax deductable.

      Since 9/11 Bush has engaged in the biggest exapnsion of federal govt since the new deal. If the prescription drug benefits pass (looks like it) he will have also created the largest entitlement program since the new deal.

      With an explosion the size of the govt and the mammoth increase in entitlements AND a decrease in taxes collected the inevitable result will be a gigantic deficit.

      Go ask a farmer to give up subsidies and see how he reacts.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    16. Re:I say this in all seriousness by z4ce · · Score: 1

      Considering what an ineffecient bureacracy the government is, I would tend to think YES.

      The government works without direct incentives. They get to take your money. People working without incentives don't have much reason to help you. Witness your state DMV office.

      Consider that person working for the government is someone who CAN'T be working in private industry more effeciently. Consider you have to pay for that person whether or not you desire their services.

      Putting future generations in debt is a bad thing. However, leveraging (i.e. debt) the future to smooth market volatility is probably pretty smart. Regardless of what you hear in the media, the United States really don't have a debt problem. Look at the government debt/GDP ratio. When I took macro about a year ago the ratio was like %6.

      The governments strategy right now is simple:
      * Increase government spending (bolsters economy)
      * Reduce taxes (Bolster economy)
      * Lower interest rates (Bolsters the economy, technically the Fed sets this not the government)

      Once the economy heats up both of the first two items will be harder to change since they are set by legislator not by the Fed.

      What is interesting is that it appears that changing the tax rate has basically no effect on government revenue beyond the year of the change within the observed values of tax rates in the united states.

      That is, there seems to be an equilbrium between taxes decreasing with economic growth within a range of tax rates.

      Intuitively, this makes sense if you think of it like follows.

      Consider a %90 tax rate. Basically no body would want to do anything, but the government would get A LOT of every transaction. The economy would be terrible at the government would be poor.

      Consider a %1 tax rate. There would be a lot of activity but the government would get very little. The economy would be hot, government would be poor (but less than in the first case.

      Now consider something like %10. You would expect it to not be too burdensome on ecomomy and yet make the government rich. If you think about it, you can see it makes sense that for reasonable values of the tax rate, you would expect that the economic growth and tax rate would tend to balance out. Primarily by choosing a tax rate you end up setting the growth of your economy.

    17. Re:I say this in all seriousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Really? I've been getting the biggest bonuses of my life and making more money than ever after Bush became President. (coding professionally since 1988)
      Damned defense contractors, they always have to gloat! Hope you're saving up; when Bush is out, the war is over and defense budgets go back to normal.
    18. Re:I say this in all seriousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming the Democrat Party will win in 2008.

    19. Re:I say this in all seriousness by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 1

      If your friend found that the tax rate has nothing to do with the economy, he should have published that!

      There's not even a correlation. It would have been a very short paper. I'll reproduce it here:

      "Taxes and the economic cycle"

      Graph 1: The tax rate over time
      Graph 2: The GNP over time

      This researcher used his own two eyes to see that the two graphs don't look anything alike. The End.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    20. Re:I say this in all seriousness by z4ce · · Score: 1

      Read this for some emperical data showing it DOES influence the economy. Further, it argues why those purporting it doesn't influence the economy are wrong.

    21. Re:I say this in all seriousness by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      1) Cato is full of shit. Rabidly pro-capitalist, to the point of rejecting anything that doesn't fit their world view.
      2) The study doesn't address the business cycle. Read what I wrote carefully, and avoid putting up straw men.

      Note that nowhere in what I just wrote did I disagree with you specifically, so there's no need to respond with a defense of your arguments. I'm sure they are good arguments, just that they don't apply to what I'm talking about.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    22. Re:I say this in all seriousness by z4ce · · Score: 1

      You said it's hard to understand [why increasing tax rates would be bad] because you first have to link to business cyles.

      I assumed you misused the term business cycle to mean "business growth." Since I don't see why business cycles (Bust and booms) would be revelents to this conversation at all.

      Can you explain why you feel a link between the tax rate and business cycles are necessary? It seems to me you only need a link between the tax rate and total production (wealth created).

    23. Re:I say this in all seriousness by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 1

      OK, in a nutshell, what do your reports say about the business cycle in Sweden vs. tax rate? Not much. All they say is that the economy there must suck because of the high tax rate. Maybe, maybe not.

      But the papers do not show why sometimes in Sweden when you raise taxes the economy gets better.

      We have the same situation right here in the US. We're spending a lot of money on a war, but the economy is getting better. On the other hand, Bush's tax cuts don't seem to have done much to help the economy, because the cuts were long ago, not recent.

      The tax rate at the time does not drive the economy. It's overwhelmed by things such as the prime interest rate, and even psychological factors.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    24. Re:I say this in all seriousness by z4ce · · Score: 1

      Actually, you would expect that tax rates would take over a year to kick in. It's not like company's are going to instantly reevaluate all of the projects they had previously declined. People respond to incentives but it takes time to realign to the new set of incentives when they change.

      I don't know if a tax rate "drives" the economy, but all of our economic theories certainly postulate that it will strongly influence the economy (as I laid out in my original response).

      Tracking such a thing in real life is very difficult due to the shure number of variables. However, as that article outlines, we do tend to see growth linked to lower tax rates. Countries with high tax rates tend to have slower economies and countries with lower tax rates tend to have faster economies. Compare Sweden (high taxes) and Switzerland (lowest taxes and richest country in the EU).

      If you could show that the economy does not respond to tax rate changes, you would categorically destroy just about every macro-economic theory. The same thoeries which dictate how the prime rate (strongly influenced by the Fed) affect the economy, also say the tax rate will influence the economy.

      Of course, the discount rate will work faster, since it can be changed instantly. However, the tax rate change should have longer lasting effects.

    25. Re:I say this in all seriousness by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 1

      If you could show that the economy does not respond to tax rate changes

      This is the problem with you. You're talking about something other than what I am talking about. You're talking economy, I'm talking business cycle. It's the understanding of the ups and downs of business, not the economy in general.

      And no, it wouldn't rewrite macro-economic theory, except in the minds of non-economists at the Cato Institute. They put too high of an emphasis on the tax rate, because politically they like to see low taxes. I don't disagree with that, but science and politics should not be mixed.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    26. Re:I say this in all seriousness by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Another response to you:

      I found these graphs on the web. I really hate to post them, because just like the Cato Institute, the source of these graphs is politically biased, a bad thing when it comes to science. So, don't take these as 100% fact, because I don't represent them as such. I though I might agree with their conclusions, I may or may not agree with their chain of reasoning.

      I am just posting these graphs as an example of how the tax rate graph doesn't look like a graph of some economic indicators, much less resemble the business cycle.

      OK, I hope that was a good enough disclaimer:

      http://www.stw.org/research/TrickleDown.html

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    27. Re:I say this in all seriousness by z4ce · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about the amplitude of the rises and falls? Are you talking about the timing? Why do those things really matter? Certainly no body can predict very well when we will see bust/booms nor how extreme they will be. Please clarify what you mean by business cyles and why you feel they matter.

      We tend to view volatility as a bad thing, but certainly the most important thing is that the economy in general is rising. Said another way, the most important thing is that trend line through real GDP is rising.

      Perfect exampe of the effects of higher taxes. I right know someone who is in management in a large privately held company. They are currently evaluating whether or not -- primarily due to taxes -- they should move their organization to Switzerland. That certainly means less jobs in America and ironically, less tax revenue.

      Especially in the current environment of corporate globalism, taxes are becoming a bertrend-competition type environment. Personally, this is another reason why taxing the rich is a bad idea. They tend to have better resources to reallocate their money to places it won't get taxed.

      The site you sent me as some serious flaws, for one thing the charts are whacked.
      You can't hardly read the axises. Take for example Real GDP growth rate vs. top income tax rate. This is completely and utter meaningless. Completely unadjusted for any other macroeconomic effects. There is so much multicollinearity here I just don't even want to try to begin why this is so wrong. Then to say the correlation coeffecient is .06 is basically nothing.. but slightly positive. I'm willing to bet my house on the fact that running a freakin' linear regression on that data has absolutely zero power. It's so mindless to run a linear regression on a graph that looks like that.. it certainly scares me that anyone with a sense of integrity would even try it.

      If you wanted an appropiate model it would have to adjust for business cycles, test to make sure the relationship isn't to a power or log. Certainly you would expect tax rates to be a lagged predictor of economic success. That should be accounted for. Probably the previous years GDP would need to be in the MLR. Certainly 9/11 would need to be a dummy variable. Really even an MLR is a bad model to try to fit it at all. Some of the new sophisticated EWMA-esque prediction models having been trying to capture GDP growth as a function of currently observeable values. I specifically saw a Demo of Forecast Pro where they were doing this.

      I really think a statistical model to attempting to measure the effects of tax rates is probably wrong though. There are so many variables it is going to be VERY hard to isolate the tax rate. I think we need to see a theory on why increasing taxes would be beneficial.

      Certainly for low level of the tax rates this is true. The government needs enough money to enforce contracts, stop assasinations, theft, etc. The best way they could do this would be through taxing negative externalities, from a social benefit perspective.

      I personal think that taxing exchange of capital (i.e. corporate income tax) is a really bad idea. Corporations are by nature very fluid. It doesn't make sense to tax at that point anyway. Why not tax at the personal level?

      Now back to that website.. lets look at another graph. Top tax rate vs. Change in employment... Whoah. Let's say during a boom a tax increase is put into place, a bust occurs and tax rates go down. Does this mean that the tax increase is responsible? Hardly. Let's say a tax increase is implemented in a bust, and a boom begins.. the unemployment rate decreases. Does this mean the tax rate increase is valid?

      These poeple statistics and use of graphics is so misleading and completely nonsensical I can't hardly believe an organization that claims to be about the economy would publish it. To be fair, you did warn me. :)

      The Cato's article did rely heavily on anecdotal evidence. While anecdotal

    28. Re:I say this in all seriousness by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 1

      OK, so you took all that I said, and just disregarded it.

      Dude, the story I told was about an economist who couldn't get his PhD because he made an unwarranted assumption.

      And now, you're telling me that you're an economist. Maybe you should have been his advisor.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    29. Re:I say this in all seriousness by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 1

      Please clarify what you mean by business cyles and why you feel they matter.

      Try to avoid phrases like "This is the problem with you."

      I just can't avoid it. Here's my points:

      1) I don't disagree with you. Really, I don't.
      2) Cato is full of shit.
      3) You're just too eager to fight.
      4) This person had a very specific paper. He had a very specific view of business cycles, and almost everything else about it was specific.
      5) You on the other hand are bothering me about very general things. I doubt you've read his paper. I doubt that you are an economist. More likely, you are a libertarian.
      5.9) I was originally just telling a story about my friend.
      6) And that IS the problem with you.

      Now take a look at your response to me in light of what I just wrote to you and ask yourself seriously "do I like to argue about things I don't quite understand with people who agree with me?"

      Sorry about the two responses, but I thought I'd be more helpful with this one.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
  40. Re:Somewhat offtopic, but... PCs have gotten CHEAP by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

    Maybe because they've never been really cheap.

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  41. Censored by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Funny
    The testers of the new PCs say they run fabulously and are a great low-cost alternative to regular PCs. However, some noted that many of their MP3s either wouldn't play at all, or had certain words censored out.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Censored by sys$manager · · Score: 1

      And they couldn't access this.

  42. Re:Dude: You're getting a Walmart! by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

    *groan*

  43. Re:Go XP by Aardpig · · Score: 1

    I vote for XP. People can watch videos, edit their digital camcorder stuff and listen to a whole bunch of Internet radio stuff, as well as download iTunes.

    Hell, yes!. How else can one get pwned for under $100 (previous Windows version required)?

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  44. Re:Somewhat offtopic, but... PCs have gotten CHEAP by MKalus · · Score: 1

    Not quite right.

    Citrix for example is heavily used. Mainly in Callcentres and such but they are used. Were I work right now we have several Citrix farms as we have several call centres all across the country.

    The backend is all Unix (HP & Sun, even some DEC) but the frontend is all Windows with Citrix.

    Thin Clients are on their way, most likely from IBM, Flatpanel and all.

    --
    If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
  45. Kwality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple eat your heart out!

  46. Hidden costs by The+Tyro · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You aren't kidding.

    I just built a Linux computer for my parents (dad's an older guy in his 60's) instead of a windows machine... and it's precisely because of the software cost.

    A little shuttle cube, duron processor, 512 of RAM, 160GB drive, DVD/CD-RW combo drive... all for under 500 bucks. When he wanted windows, I informed him that his OS, office suite, and antivirus would almost double the cost of his computer... I did a quick assessment and realized he could do all the stuff he wanted on Linux (including utilize a USB printer and a USB scanner). I even set it up so I can administer it remotely via SSH (or even webmin tunneled over SSH if I'm feeling really lazy).

    Needless to say, my mother and father are now big fans. I say good for Walmart if they want to market machines with linux and windows side-by-side... I'd like to see the sales numbers on that deal.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:Hidden costs by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      I informed him that his OS, office suite, and antivirus would almost double the cost of his computer

      Wow... so you can't install OpenOffice or StarOffice on Windows? No wonder they're not gaining much ground on MS Office.

      And if you want an excellent cheap AV, look at www.my-etrust.com

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    2. Re:Hidden costs by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

      Of course you can use OO on windows, I use it myself on my windows machines. My point is that you don't have to pay the big bucks for MS software when there are other viable options available. And, as long as you're going open-source, might as well make it a complete package.

      --
      Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    3. Re:Hidden costs by jjhlk · · Score: 1

      I use Windows, but besides that and IE, it's all open source software (besides games).

    4. Re:Hidden costs by invckb · · Score: 1

      You have a lot more 'ethics' than me.

    5. Re:Hidden costs by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      You don't like Firebird or Opera?

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    6. Re:Hidden costs by ssstraub · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing.

    7. Re:Hidden costs by Spoing · · Score: 1
      Along the same lines, you might find this mildly interesting.

      I did a quick calculation of the OS cost using the MicroTel laptops on the WalMart site as a guide.

      Microtel offers laptops with and without an OS. WalMart was careful not to have identical machines listed. They were very similar, though, differing mainly in the display size (14 or 15 inch) and the CPU speed (look at the ones with 1.4 and 1.5 G).

      Still, there wasn't one set of laptops that were the same minus the OS difference.

      Comparing the laptops that have and don't have an OS on those points (CPU and display), it turns out that the Windows XP Home option is $100. Just the OS, no apps, no extras. (It's likely an OEM version only works on specific machines and may not have a resore CD, though the WalMart site doesn't say either way. No real resale value.)

      $100 is quite a bit on a sub-$1,000 laptop.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    8. Re:Hidden costs by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      What about AVG? Sure, it's UI ain't great, but it'll do the job. BTW, avast! is FUGLY. WHY in god's name would you skin an AV app to look like an MP3 player?

    9. Re:Hidden costs by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Actually, I did that in 10 minutes building my own desktop, and I could have done it in two, looking at the specs and base unit pricing.

      They don't want you finding out how much Lindows costs them, however. The Lindows byo box has a faster CD-RW than the No OS byo box. The prices for the base units are:

      $196.00 for No OS
      $210.48 for LindowsOS

      It costs them $14.48 for Lindows and a faster CD-RW.

      The Lycoris box costs:

      $198.00 for No OS
      $224.48 for Lycoris

      $26.48 for Lycoris.

    10. Re:Hidden costs by Spoing · · Score: 1
      It costs them $14.48 for Lindows and a faster CD-RW. ... $26.48 for Lycoris.

      Wow. Even if there wasn't a no-OS option, why bother with Lindows?

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    11. Re:Hidden costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STFU n00b!!!

    12. Re:Hidden costs by jjhlk · · Score: 1

      For the most part I love Firebird (and abhor Opera). But there are certain things about it that annoy me, and given that IE works perfectly and smoothly I just use it (IE).

      From the last version I used .6 something, these are a couple things that annoyed me: o Can't open multiple instances without it bitching about profiles.
      o Bad plugin support; I could never get Shockwave working. I couldn't get Quicktime to be embedded into the browser to play movies. Certain internet radio stations I listed to (using ASF) wouldn't play (I could look through the source, copy the links and play them).

      The latest version fixed crash bugs, which was good. Pop-up blocking is nothing since I get that from IE plugins. I never used the large amount of avaiable plugins for Firebird. I've never had a problem with IE's lack of security.

  47. Think about it...This is important.. by zoid.com · · Score: 1

    PCs are now a real commodity. Think about it. Walmart has it's own brand name for the other clones. Sam's Choice Cola for example. My first PC was a 286/16 that I bought for $250 out of computer shopper. The 20 MB Kalok hard drive was another $200. The video card set me back $100 and the monochrom VGA monitor was another $150. Let's not even start to talk about the price of memory at that time. Of course my $900 TRS-80 CoCo was my favorite computer of all. Maybe these Walmart computers are Sam's Choice PC's.

    1. Re:Think about it...This is important.. by raodin · · Score: 1

      I think you're missing a 0 on the end of that 286's price..

  48. MOD PARENT & GRANDPARENT DOWN!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  49. Re:Great! by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Is that Walmart that you are talking about or Dell, Gateway, HP/Compaq, etc?

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  50. Wal-Mart is the Microsoft of stores. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wal-Mart is the Microsoft of stores. Wal-Mart is crushing American companies. They demand lower prices, forcing American companies to outsource overseas, causing losses of American jobs. If they cannot or will not cut the prices to levels that require slave labor, Wal-Mart goes to overseas companies. The result? Americans who shop at Wal-Mart are shopping themselves out of a job.

    1. Re:Wal-Mart is the Microsoft of stores. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You are so wrong, jeez, the decline in american manufacturing was cause primarily by the inflexibility forced upon mfg's by unions. It happened long before walmart dominated. For examples read "The End of Detroit". Protectionism never works, only accepting and adapting.

    2. Re:Wal-Mart is the Microsoft of stores. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Walmart isn't doing the crushing, American's are. American's demand lower prices and prefer not to pay more to support their communitys.

    3. Re:Wal-Mart is the Microsoft of stores. by cmacb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't see that much difference in name brands used at Walmart, Sears or any of the others. They all get most of their inventory (particularly clothes) from overseas. While I agree that there may be some problems with this I don't see how Walmart is any guiltier than anyone else.

      In particular, with respect to laptops I don't think anyone makes them here. HP, Dell and all the others are just import agents who at most get their logo stamped on the machines over here... although it's more likely even that happens overseas...I think the systems come IN THE BOX and ready to go, unless you request a memory upgrade or something.

      Now, given that there is really no such thing as a Dell or HP laptop, would you rather pay $2000 or $700 for it? Now the article didn't actually mention the price (said they didn't know) but they used current $799 machines as a guess of what the price might be. Problem is that those systems have already gone through a middle-man of some sort. I'd be more inclined to think that the target price will be $500 and a price point like that might convince some people to make a laptop their first computer. We'll see.

    4. Re:Wal-Mart is the Microsoft of stores. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a hard time correlating "lower prices" with "shipping jobs to india"
      This has more to do with the businesses making the products needing to line executive pockets with more money than mere mortals can even spend, than it has to do with the whole company being forced to nearly collapse because they have to offer such low, low prices. We all know if Wal-Mart asked laptop mfrs to offer $200 laptops, no one would sell to them. The fact is, there is a bottom line, and if companies werent selling out their employees to save a few bucks, the laptops would be $850, and the job market wouldn't be so distraught right now.

    5. Re:Wal-Mart is the Microsoft of stores. by euxneks · · Score: 1

      Good thing I'm not American. =D

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    6. Re:Wal-Mart is the Microsoft of stores. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      American's demand lower prices and prefer not to pay more to support their communitys.
      I call bullshit here. In fact, I don't remember the last time I walked into any store and demanded anything.

      Wal-Mart continually pressures their vendors to provide the same product at a lower price, year after year. I can't think of many retail situations where this sort of logic will fly. Do I, as a consumer, expect to pay less for a loaf of bread next year than I'm paying this year? Do you, as a consumer, expect that gasoline will be cheaper next year than it is today? Of course not. So why does Wal-Mart?

      Let's take a good old-fashioned American example: beer. My staple of choice is a six-pack of Bud Light 16-oz cans. A few years ago, that six-pack cost me about $5. Last year, it cost me $5.85. It now costs $6 even. Why does the price of the beer keep rising? Because the cost to make it keeps rising. Do you think that while Rite-Aid gently bumps the price of a six-pack of Bud Light, Anheuser Busch is charging Rite-Aid less and less for that product? No.

      Over time, prices go UP, not down. Inflation happens. I'm not complaining about that. The problem is Wal-Mart's expectations of its vendors that prices will continue to drop. This expectation is unrealistic. It has driven companies out of business as they attempted to meet Wal-Mart's demands, faced with the alternative of losing Wal-Mart to a knockoff supplier and going out of business anyway.

      Look at Vlasic, the pickle company. Wal-Mart pressured them into selling a gallon of dill spears for $3 retail. The end result was that Vlasic's other products quit selling, as people flocked to Wal-Mart. Why pay $2 for a little jar of pickles at Kroger when you can get an entire gallon at Wal-Mart for a dollar more?

      Vlasic was left with a choice: keep selling to Wal-Mart making a penny per gallon, or pull out, in which case the Wal-Mart shoppers would start buying whatever Brand-Z pickles Wal-Mart put on the shelves.

      Vlasic has since filed for bankruptcy.

      Wal-Mart makes a practice of "hooking" shoppers on something, and then using that sales power to intimidate vendors. If you're Vlasic, and Wal-Mart comes to you saying "we want to sell your pickles," it sounds great at first. Five years later, when Wal-Mart has demanded lower prices five years in a row and you're barely breaking even because your costs have gone up, it's a different story.

      Consumers aren't to blame. Consumers would have been happy to pay $6 for a gallon of pickles if Wal-Mart hadn't backed Vlasic into a corner. Sure, Wal-Mart may have only pushed 60 gallons a week per store instead of 80, but that isn't consumers' fault, nor is it our responsibility.

      I did not ask Vlasic for $3/gallon pickles. Wal-Mart did. Now tell me again how I'm to blame?
    7. Re:Wal-Mart is the Microsoft of stores. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked at dell. They build their own systems, right here in the USA. In Nashville, TN, to be precise (well, mostly there).

    8. Re:Wal-Mart is the Microsoft of stores. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Please learn when it's appropriate to use the apostrophe.

      Thanks.

    9. Re:Wal-Mart is the Microsoft of stores. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1

      It is inappropriate to use the apostrophe in "communitys." It should, instead, be spelled, "communities." No apostrophe.

    10. Re:Wal-Mart is the Microsoft of stores. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he's right. I used to work at an Office Depot located directly across from a Walmart. I had quite a few customers actually haggle a price difference of less than $10 on a $400 printer. They didn't care that the extra couple of dollars would help pay for the informed associates who sold them the printer, and who were obligated to support it after the sale. It's all about the Benjamins to the Walmart shopper.

    11. Re:Wal-Mart is the Microsoft of stores. by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      Why do I not have moderator points today? Anyway...

      Americans who shop at Wal-Mart are shopping themselves out of a job.

      Bullshit. Wal-Mart is, at this point, turning $250B/year. Their profits have been steadily rising, yet we still have a low unemployment rate (even with 10M Mexicans in the country illegally). If they were causing jobs to be lost, we'd see it.

      Wal-Mart forces their suppliers to be as efficient as possible to keep prices as low as possible. So what if Vlasic can't overcharge for a jar of pickles now. Welcome to Econ 101, class. Boo-hoo. This is a free market, this is how free markets operate.

      You people who bitch about Wal-Mart would have a legitimate complaint if they were driving prices down for their suppliers while keeping them inflated for the consumer. But they don't. They pass the savings on.

      Get over it.

    12. Re:Wal-Mart is the Microsoft of stores. by pmz · · Score: 1



      Grow up.

      Americans need to change to get along in the world, and Wal-Mart is part of that change. We can build a wall around ourselves and drag around our security blankets, but the truth is that the EU and SE Asia will simply go forward and rub our noses in it.

      Free trade saves jobs, but people like you who can't see past their noses are dragging this country into a living hell of stagnation and, ultimately, collapse..

  51. Strange by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    I did all of that tonight EXCEPT for download itunes. Admitly, it is the tune download that is not really available by the majors. But, if Walmart loads linux on the laptop, you can bet on it that their new download will be for Linux as well.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  52. Re:Somewhat offtopic, but... PCs have gotten CHEAP by Usquebaugh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yep,

    server based computing is the answer.

    Forget the CD look at etherboot, no CD no hard disk. No fscking way my users can hose the machine with software. If they break the hardware just wander down with a replacement.

    LTSP is one project working on Xterms.

    For my money we are still waiting for fault tolerant clusters before this really takes off. I want cheap Xterms connected by ethernet to my FT cluster. A node fails no problem another will auto take over with no downtime ot any user. Auto load balancing ie Mosix. Cheap replacable server farm baby :-)

    The best bit is that it's coming, the work is now being done on more than one project :-)

  53. In Germany, this rocked the retail PC market by Hanno · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Selling PCs at supermarkets has rocked the German PC market.

    ALDI (a very popular discount retailer, similar to Wal-Mart) began selling computers a few years back, both desktop PCs and laptops. They still do so on a regular basis and just this week they had a not-too-bad all-in-one all-purpose PC for home users.

    These computers are special time-limited offers, marketed in large quantities over a few days, about twice a year. So limited that when the first series was sold in 1997, one customer tried to secure his PC using a gun.

    Aldi has become so successful that its main supplier Medion has slowly become the #1 computer manufacturer in Germany (although it is unclear wether it can hold that spot - the company is struggling, too).

    Several other competing supermarket chains have joined the market with their own line of bargain PCs and now there are a number of "Schnappchen PC" offers popping up in several supermarkets chains before Christmas every year. You pick up your fully-installed, ready-to-go PC right next to your milk, bread and toilet paper.

    Although computer pros initially laughed at the thought of buying an ALDI PC, it turned out to be a pretty good offer. Thanks to huge numbers of absolutely identical PCs to be sold, the company preparing these boxes had time to slash prices and still do the configuration better than what you'd often get at the likes of Dell or your local selfmade-PC-shop.

    The ALDI PC is targeted at home users and its first versions were quite well thought-out and sold like crazy. (See gun story, linked above.)

    These days, customers aren't that mad about the ALDI PC anymore, it seems. The recent offerings were more and more prone to feature-overload. The current ALDI PC comes with everything and a kite: Next to the standard stuff it includes a universal card drive, a TV-in card, a remote control, wireless keyboard and mouse, wireless LAN and a DVD burner on top of the DVD read only drive...

    But still, ALDI teared down the wall, put massive price pressure on everyone else and literally brought the multimedia PC to the masses with a PC that's actually really ok.

    --

    ------------------
    You may like my a cappella music
    1. Re:In Germany, this rocked the retail PC market by thogard · · Score: 1

      ALDI tends to be about the same all over the world. For example they tend to sell one brand of Corn Flakes and it tends to be a generic brand as well. They only sell mass produced commodities at a low markup.

      What this means for the PC industry is that its at the has gotten to the point where a large number of people look at the machines and say "I'll take the generic one". Thats going to make things even harder for the likes of Dell and Gateway who go after the home market.for the likes of Dell and IBM.

    2. Re:In Germany, this rocked the retail PC market by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I haven't heard any reviews, but considering FSB was the main limiting factor of the previous US Aldi PC, the one that just came out should be kick ass.

    3. Re:In Germany, this rocked the retail PC market by pmz · · Score: 1


      ALDI is a store I hope becomes more popular (it's cropping up in the South-East recently). It's the only place I know that under-sells Wal-Mart, and, from what I've seen, they build relatively small stores selling mostly non-perishable things (negating the doom-sayers' arguments about super-stores).

    4. Re:In Germany, this rocked the retail PC market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes-they sell one size of items that can "move quickly" and have a "small markup" over their costs. They had graphics tablets (coupled with cordless mice) for US$40 2 weeks ago as their sale. They had $100 19" monitors last Feb. (while most stores sold them for US$300). Now, if the only carried more items (such as product "depth" instead of only, say, one style of pretzel, bean, pasta, cooking oil, etc.

      BTW- they even sell wine in Europe's shops... (unlike those in the states)

  54. illegals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The illegal immigrants arrested at walmart stores were employees of a cleaning company, which Walmart outsourced to, they were not directly employed by walmart. I can tell you from experiece that they are very much top of the legal status of their employees.

    Secondly, I can tell you from experience that no ameircan citizen who can collect welfare or disability(a big problem in my state)* will work for minimum wage cleaning.

    On numerous occations I sat in on interviews with (allegedly "bad" parents) and it goes something like this.

    Q: Do you have any health problems?
    A: no, I'm fine.

    Q: where do you work?
    A: I don't I'm on disability

    Q: Have you ever used drugs?
    A: no

    Q: Whens the last time you smoked pot
    A: yerterday

  55. Re:Somewhat offtopic, but... PCs have gotten CHEAP by The+Snowman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The computers are throwaways, and you don't have to move data from a broken one to a new one. It's all on the servers.

    What about Sun's system where you have a smart card that you can insert into a computer and your desktop pops up with everything still open, i.e. no logging out and back into the network? Everything is on the server, including any state regarding your login/desktop.

    I hate how Windows handles logins. At work I have to download my profile, merge it with what is on the desktop. When I log out, it uploads it back to the network. In Unix/Linux your home directory and configuration reside on the server all the time. With Sun's solution, they take it one step farther -- the workstation is basically a monitor, keyboard and mouse plugged into ethernet.

    Kind of reminds me of ye olde client/server systems with a mainframe and "dumb terminals." Now they call them "thin clients," but the concept is the same.

    --
    24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
  56. Could it be... by phatvibez · · Score: 1

    the Lindows Mobile PC they announced earlier:

    Lindows Mobile PC

    LinuxJournal just did a review of the machine itself in their latest issue and gave it pretty good marks.

    They also have an entry on their website about uninstalling all the Lindows branded stuff and upgrading to Debian:

    LinuxJournal: Customizing a Lindows MobilePC

    --
    --- Brad (http://www.LinuxReview.net)
    1. Re:Could it be... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      It isn't. This laptop has an 800MHz C3, whereas WalMart was thinking along the lines of the Athlon XP-M or Celeron. Not a bad price for ultra-thin and light, but the CPU sucks ass (any C3 without a C5* class core (currently only Nehemia @ 1GHz) sucks ass).

  57. Re:Damn, I'm OLD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THAT WAS YOU!?!?! YOU MOTHERFUCKER!!! I spent my high school years clearing that fucking piece of shit program off computers at my dad's radioshack!

  58. Re:Great! by ron_ivi · · Score: 1
    Guess that depeinds on if you consider China and Taiwan different or not. Seems most Dells and HPs come from Taiwan.

    http://www.taiwanheadlines.com/20030929/20030929b5 .html
    "Sep 29 2003... Taiwan procurements by HP, Dell to top NT$1 trillion: analysts

    Frantic global purchase of notebook personal computers has prompted Hewlett Packard (HP) and Dell, the world's two leading PC brands, to increase their purchases in Taiwan.

    The two companies' combined procurements from Taiwan are expected to top NT$1 trillion (US$29.7 billion) in 2004."

  59. That's an old idea by anti-NAT · · Score: 1

    I was describing this idea back in 1995, and claim no originality for it. This is the NC or Network Computer model.

    People talk about the TCO of a PC, such that only about 20% of the total cost of ownership is the cost of the hardware, over the life of the device.

    If you break the PC down further, you end up with three functional components, without any of which the device won't operate :

    • CPU
    • RAM
    • HDD

    If you then look at where the TCO costs break down over those three components, nearly all of them are incurred by the presence of the HDD. Specifically, it's all the futzing around with the operation system, applications and user data. Additionally, failure rates of HDDs are significantly higher than CPUs or RAM, again incurring higher costs.

    Get rid of the HDD, make the PC boot off of the CD-ROM drive, or even better, off of the network, and a significant portion of the TCO disappears.

    Some people will argue that you must have a HDD in case the network goes down. Well, what you do is spend some of the money that you save by not having a HDD and the associated maintenance costs, on making the network more reliable. It is still going to be cheaper at the end of the day.

    This is a great technical solution, and has been possible at least since 1991 - you could boot PCs off of the network that many years ago.

    However, it has never taken off. Why ? Pretty much Microsoft. They make a lot of money from what's put on PC HDD, and they have had such influence over the industry direction that when they came out against it, the Network Computer model never really took off.

    The philosophical lesson to learn from this is

    the best technical solution isn't necessarily the one that is successful

    If you want your best technical solution to succeed, you need to learn to, and work out how to best market it.

    --
    The Internet's nature is peer to peer - 20050301_cs_profs.pdf
  60. Yeah, $750... by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    Ah, but there is something that Northgate doesn't have... Massive name brand recognition and an installed consumer base of several million people already in place ^_^

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:Yeah, $750... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Walmart has never been about brand recognition. Brands are nice but they have regularly slit the throats of big names for cheaper suppliers.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:Yeah, $750... by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

      It doesn't really matter if they've been about it, they have it. They have it among a great many shoppers. As far as slitting the throat of supplier X for cheaper stuff from supplier Y; Yeah, so what? given the number of consumers they already have, most people apparently don't care..

      --
      You need a FREE iPod Nano
    3. Re:Yeah, $750... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      I get hit square in the face with the cluebat so often around here that I'm starting to think I'm a masoquist.

      (As he sips his generic diner coffee, after finishing a call on his noname phone.)

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  61. Re:Damn, I'm OLD. by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 3, Funny
    Cool program. Would have been fun to see.

    When I was in high school, and using PDP printer terminals in my computer programming class (yes, this goes way back), I wrote a program that would lock out keyboard input, go into a loop of form feeding paper, and never stop until someone pulled the plug. I then named my little program "SEX.BAS" and put a warning at first when it run that this was a dangerous program, not to touch it.

    I left it in our class's shared directory and waited. About 15 minutes later a cluster of male students were sitting around the terminal whispering, when suddenly the paper began form-feeding at high speed and they panicked! Ah, that was fun, preying on the natural curiosity of my fellow geeks.

  62. Surely we shouldn't stope them by anti-NAT · · Score: 1

    It's such an evil, evil thing to do to anybody, even your worst enemy.

    --
    The Internet's nature is peer to peer - 20050301_cs_profs.pdf
    1. Re:Surely we shouldn't stope them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, give the man a break! He did say that he was a Wal-Mart employee! Do you think you can work there 40 hours a week (no overtime allowed) and maintain proper English spelling and/or grammar? I think not!

  63. Wal-Mart to Offer Wal-Mart Notebooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At first I thought I wouldn't have to pay even $0.89 for a one-subject notebook.

    Then I realized you fuckers are talking about computers.

    1. Re:Wal-Mart to Offer Wal-Mart Notebooks by jjhlk · · Score: 1

      That's why these people need to start using the word "laptop."

      o Laptops can comfortably sit on your lap!
      o The name contrasts well with desktop.
      o It isn't ambiguous like notebook.

      In closing, say laptop.

    2. Re:Wal-Mart to Offer Wal-Mart Notebooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't call them laptops because they don't want to imply that you can use them on your lap.

      Why not?

    3. Re:Wal-Mart to Offer Wal-Mart Notebooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why these people need to start using the word "laptop."

      Most of the Wal-Mart shoppers I've seen don't actually have laps.

  64. This is it by synergy3000 · · Score: 1

    This is the true turning a PC into a common household good like your TV and VCR. Walmart will certainly sell the wireless internet access kits to make more money. Look for them as well to partner and sell ISP services. Heck they may even start their own ISP if they haven't already. How about a Walmart OS? Open source linux guts with a closed source Walmart GUI. AOL does it for the internet. Why not Walmart for linux. Who do we fear most after this? Walmart or Microsoft? Two monoliths in their own.

    1. Re:This is it by DRACO- · · Score: 2, Informative

      Walmart already has their own isp..
      $9.94 a month..

      http://www.walmart.com/catalog/catalog.gsp?cat=1 03 468&path=0%3A103468
      Though the access terms are kinda funny. They say first month free, 700 hours free then go on to say unlimited email and internet access.

      Needs some clarity.

      DRACO-

      --
      Consider yourself blessed if you are sneezed on by a dragon and only get wet, it could have been a fireball.
    2. Re:This is it by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      How 'bout some help here: it's AOL with WalMart branding. Same terms as AOL, just cheaper and with less free hours. So, you have one month to use 700 free hours. If you go over, you have to pay for that first month (AFAIK). If you go under, you don't get those extra hours back. I bet AOL did that because people would use 10 hours per month, so they got 50 months free, so AOL had to do something.

  65. Re:Dude: You're getting a Walmart! by jjhlk · · Score: 1

    Don't worry, it's trademarked.

  66. Re:Damn, I'm OLD. by lcde · · Score: 1

    Try changing the desktop from explorer to notebook.exe in the windows.ini.

    Always priceless after a quick reboot.
    Second best is putting a password on a screensaver at BestBuy and placing the screensaver in the startup menu.

    "Got to be quick salesman! Hit the windows key!"

    --
    :%s/teh/the/g
  67. Rollback by RedHat_Linux_Man · · Score: 1

    I hope their price rollback's don't mean my drivers roll back too.

  68. PR Release! by Qweezle · · Score: 1, Informative

    New York, New York:
    A new era in ultra-low-cost computer is being ushered in. In September 1998, a startup company calling themselves "eMachines" decided to rise to a challenge only Tandy had previously been able to truly accomplish: set the minimum for all computers produced from their inception on. Today, however, Wal-Mart announced that they will indeed be creating their own ultra-low-cost microcomputers also. This is a shocking announcement that has truly rattled the industry, and eMachines has released a short press statement for all of its concerned investors:

    Wayne Inouye, President and CEO of eMachines, has clarified our goal even further with this most recent announcement by rival mass producer of cheaply manufactured goods Wal-Mart: "We will NOT be fazed by this ridiculous move by such a terrible, monstrous, top-grossing company like Wal-Mart! They cannot rival us, for our features at the lowest cost we can possibly churn them out at profitably are just unbeatable! For example, our newest eMachines laptop, yes, it is cheap too, comes STANDARD with USB 1.1! Over 1.1523 times faster than USB 1.0! In addition, you can easily purchase one of our wonderful value monitors in a bundle deal, which we guarantee has no more than 519 dead pixels! C'mon, folks, forget Wal-Mart, just run to Best Buy and pick up an open-box returned eMachines(for even cheaper!)." Further, we plan to release new machines in the spring. A new high-end feature may be AGP expansion slots, so stay tuned to the eMachines corporate investor newsletter for more on this groundbreaking announcement.

    Wal Mart is already on the defensive, claiming that the new laptop computers will be "...the first stylish computers under $800 to include a smily face logo somewhere on the machine."
    Incredibly, Wal-Mart says it may even venture to include an "...awesome, stunning, 11" XGAVGAVWGVA screen that provides more pixels(a full 480 by 320!!!) for a lower price and more letters!" The company also reportedly plans to offer a 15-inch model for slightly more, upping the resolution to a finely grained 640 by 480.

    And in related news, SCO has released a statement that the aforementioned XGAVGAVWGVA screen may somehow have something to do with UNIX, and therefore they have filed a suit for 1,000,000,000,000 dollars, with Darl McBride drunkedly commenting "We's a' gon' takes dem' 'thar economy downs wit' us!"

    The new machines will be offered the first quarter of 2004 for an as-yet undetermined price, not to exceed a price which would have at least 75% profitability, sources say.

    1. Re:PR Release! by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 1

      Come on, moderators, read what you are moderating.

      It's funny, not insightful. I don't think that eMachines would be proud of 519 dead pixels.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    2. Re:PR Release! by petabyte · · Score: 1

      Ok ...

      This is modded informative? What the heck ...
      Funny? Maybe, but informative? My faith in moderators has slipped another notch.

    3. Re:PR Release! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just got modded down to nothing for posting interest in an open web standard on the other thread...these slashdot moderators don't even read anything but the title. "PR Release" and a bunch of text is informative, I guess, what the fuck is that all about.

    4. Re:PR Release! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I please have some of that sweet sweet crack the mods are on? Do you idiots even read the post before you mod away? Slashdot is broken and sad.

  69. Excellent! by cmacb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "If Wal-Mart, which sells PCs from companies such as Hewlett-Packard and eMachines, moves into the notebook market successfully, it could send ripples across the PC industry. The retailer's typically aggressive pricing could compel manufacturers such as Dell, HP and Toshiba to reduce their notebook prices in response, analysts said."

    I KNOW there are people who hate Walmart, but I don't. Any store that forces hardware prices down to closer to manufacturing cost is fine by me. Over priced hardware has made over price software viable for far too long. I want to PAY for true innovation and pay commodity prices for things that have long since become commodities.

    Picture a big fat guy dancing around on stage clapping his hands:

    "commodity commodity commodity commodity ... commodity commodity commodity commodity "

    "Give it up for MEEEEE"

    1. Re:Excellent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Picture a big fat guy dancing around on stage clapping his hands:

      "commodity commodity commodity commodity ... commodity commodity commodity commodity "

      Just remember; if the commoditization of America continues, the big fat guy will soon be wearing a McDonalds uniform.

    2. Re:Excellent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I KNOW there are people who hate Walmart, but I don't. Any store that forces hardware prices down to closer to manufacturing cost is fine by me. Over priced hardware has made over price software viable for far too long. I want to PAY for true innovation and pay commodity prices for things that have long since become commodities.


      And just what is the "manufacturing cost"? What is "innovation"? Let's assume there is some piece of hardware that costs $500 to make. And they sell it for $510. I'm sure that would make you happy. But next year, you'll want it for less because it's now a "commodity". What are you willing to sacrifice?

      Do you even care about the conditions and restrictions that certain products are manufactured under?

      If there was a piece of hardware for $400 and one for $600, which would you buy?

      Now what if I told you the $400 one is made in Cambodia using toxic chemicals, and the $600 one was made in N.A. using enviro-friendly methods and employees with good health insurance and benefits? What if the resultant commodity quality is identical? Would you even discriminate? Before you answer that, when was the last time you actually checked before buying? The fact that you have no problems buying from WalMart would suggest that you don't.

      Just as Ballmer's job pays above what is needed to survive, so does yours, judging by the fact that you have income to spare to buy hardware, own a computer, and have an internet connection.

      Globalization isn't about making "markets more efficient". It's about viewing the world as a close-knit social community, where we all have to play our part in making it stronger and healthier, both for the planet and our species.

      Stop thinking like an epidemic virus.
    3. Re:Excellent! by ImpTech · · Score: 1

      But Wal-Mart doesn't just force prices close to manufacturing costs, they force them *below* manufacturing costs. Their vendors either find ways to reduce their own costs, or they die. Its a model of capitalist efficiency in its own way, and its also horrible, because when you start trying to cut costs, eventually you *will* cut product quality as well. I NEVER buy electronics at walmart, because I know they're the el cheapo model and they'll break in a year or two. Maybe disposable is fine for some people, but it pisses me off.

      Now, with computers specifically, you are aware that semiconductors is probably already the most competitive industry there is? Most companies in this field pretty much can't reduce prices anymore. I don't know what overpriced hardware you think you're buying, but we're talking about a field where a manufacturer goes out of business if somebody can produce chips for fractions of a cent less. No, not a company like Intel to be sure, but any of the more commodity components that go into computers. And I'm sure even Intel doesn't have enormous profit margins. Its a very competitive industry already, and if Wal-mart thinks they're going to do their usual cost-cutting business, we're going to end up with some pretty fragile machines.

  70. Loony Toons Again (Spoiler) by wolf- · · Score: 1

    Went to watch it with my kids...
    Ok, I wanted to see it, so dragged the kids with me to make it count as a family outing...

    Anyway, our heros are all lost in the desert, and low and behold, a WALMART in the middle of nowhere.

    Bugs makes some big jokes about how much money Warners made for mention walmart a few times.

    Was hillarious indeed.

    --
    ----- LoboSoft specializes in Digital Language Lab
  71. Re:Great! by pixel.jonah · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately all of them probably.

    I have a new IBM T40 - made in China - and I'm pretty unhappy with the material and build quality.

    One of the reasons I got it in the first place was due to the ThinkPad's repuation as a well-built, durable laptop.

  72. And the manufacturer is... by Lank · · Score: 5, Informative

    Arima, as pointed out in this article. It says here that Walmart has already placed an order for 100,000 notebooks for their test-run.

    --
    Gotta get me one of these!
  73. might be okay.... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    as long as if something goes wrong and you need to call tech support, they don't have those walmart greeters answering the call....

  74. What will the brand name be called? by ScottyKUtah · · Score: 1
    What will they call thier notebook? Equate?

    "Honey, should we get the name brand HP Notebook, or save a few dollars and get the off brand?"

    --
    He who laughs last is at 300 baud.
  75. Re:Damn, I'm OLD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The RadioShack *I* went to had a C compiler to play with, and I did the same thing you did except in C:

    #include

    void main (void) {
    char c=' ';
    char s[50000];

    initscr();
    halfdelay(1); /* check input every 1/10 second*/

    do {
    c = getch();
    if (c != ERR)
    strncat(s,&c,1);
    printf("%s",s);
    refresh();
    } while (toupper(c) != 'Q');
    }

  76. Scott MacNealy would like to have a word with you by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    Been tried, failed big time.

    This is the idea behind Sun's thin client - essentially going back to the old mainframe days, but with considerably more powerful terminals.

    BTW, if you suggest a common computer language that can be used from anything from a cell phone to a server, then MacNealy has some big guys in black leather that would like to discuss your ideas out back.

    myke

  77. They can choose to not do bussiness with WalMart by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    My ex-roomate works for just such a company. National company and well know. WalMart fucked them, so they chose to discontinue selling to them. They've not gone out of bussiness, they continue to do very well.

  78. OS/2 wars post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That much? I've heard that OEM licenses for Windows can go as low as 50 cents!

    But since we don't have side by side windows/linux offerings of laptops from all the major "manufacturers", we'll never know, will we?

    If we did have side by side offerings, any guess whether there would be further price competition, and lower prices for windows boxes?

    Only someone who is 1)stupid 2)naive 3)a liar 4)working for microsoft would post that the windows monopoly is only costing $10 to the consumer in any conceivable situation.

    More info at the links located in this post.

    1. Re:OS/2 wars post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IBM testified under oath during the antitrust trial that they were paying $11/pop for Windows.

      The Red Box/Blue Box thing was just product positioning to shaft corporate customers, Teamer.

    2. Re:OS/2 wars post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was this in 2003? 2002? 2001? 2000?

      Ballmer himself, and analysts have stated that large volume OEMs are paying about $50 for windows. Don't have the link. I heard him and analysts say it during interviews and voice clips on CNBC and other financial/news sites, and have seen it in tech reports online, but haven't saved the links. And $150+ was mentioned by Ballmer and analysts (separate from Ballmer) for the office suite, prior to Office XP "stable" being released. Now that OpenOffice/StarOffice is much more useable than previous editions, and giving Microsoft competition, they are probably discounting, paying for advertising to a greater degree, and paying slotting fees to a greater degree than before.

      Citing IBM as the source for how much windows costs OEMs smacks of OS/2 wars posting. IBM had a deal that other OEM's couldn't touch due to the entire microsoft product line IBM was marketing from consumers all the way on up to enterprise. And it was in Microsoft's interest to give IBM that pricing preference. Microsoft was, and still is interested in capturing the server market (unix), something they made clear was their target before the anti-trust investigation even started, and even before Linux was on their radar screen.

      Further, IBM had, and still has, lucrative relationships with enterprise that few companies could match. Around that time, HP and Compaq were two different companies. And to show how much Microsoft values enterprise business, consider how they changed their sales to enterprise when they changed to their licensing 6.0 terms. The resellers were screaming, and revolting at what they saw as Microsoft going after their turf. It took some explaining, and possibly some adjusting of the license to calm down the resellers so they would think their large customers weren't being stolen out from under them. Now they just service the contract, instead of playing the part (and making the money) of a reseller.

      IBM's market share of consumer systems is hardly what counts. Try comparing the market leaders, such as Dell, and the white box companies, who pay more than Dell, HP, IBM and other brand names, yet have in the neighborhood of 40% total market share of consumer systems.

      When you don't have side-by-side comparisons of windows systems and linux systems on the same hardware, you are paying more for that windows system, and I am paying for a windows system that I won't use.

      It's the same problem with the medical situation in the US. You don't ask how much an MRI costs, you just make the appointment, and hand over the insurance card. If everyone started calling around to find the best price, you would find lower prices, and sites springing up to compare prices, accuracy, customer satisfaction, and everything else.

      You start putting systems up for sale that offer the same exact hardware, with the only difference being the operating system, you will start seeing lower prices for both linux and windows systems. You will also start seeing a huge number of windows systems with OpenOffice or StarOffice installed, and less systems with Microsoft Office. At that point, Microsoft Office pricing will drop like a rock (like the student/teacher edition where Microsoft and the retailers don't check to see whether you are a student or teacher, wink, wink), just like the underlying operating system. And then you and I both win.

      Your defense of Microsoft in an undefendable situation is clouding your judgement.

      It's quite possible that Walmart may get windows for $11. Or less. They'll get this pricing if they can avoid signing a contract that excludes selling linux as an alternate operating system in the US. And if they actually start offering linux laptops.

      The Inquirer and The Register have already put out stories that included info that the major OEMs are precluded from selling linux systems to the public in the US according to their contracts with microsoft.

  79. Re:Somewhat offtopic, but... PCs have gotten CHEAP by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

    You ever watch Saturday Night Live with Goatboy and "hey remember the 80's"

    Thats about where you were going. Server and dumb terminals just arn't fun. It's easier and cheaper to just have plain boxes around with everything they need. If one breaks no big deal. With the other way one little fuckus can grow quick.

    But hey, sell your idea to IBM

  80. The $14.95 Wal-Mart Notebook by rhild · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wal-mart has found a notebook they can sell for $14.95 that will be a hit with their target
    demographic from Ohio Art.

  81. Re:Somewhat offtopic, but... PCs have gotten CHEAP by woobieman29 · · Score: 1

    If you want to see examples of this happening right now, google for 'thin client' or citrix. If you want to see examples of people who have done this for decades, google instead for 'dumb terminal' , '3270' etc.... Server centric computing has been around for years. You can buy a current model thin client for $299 (maybe less) that does not store any data locally, and boots from an image delivered across a network. Load Citrix, or an open source equivalent like LTSP (Linux Terminal Server Project) on a server, connect your thin clients to the LAN, and compute away.

    --
    \/\/oobie
  82. Re:They can choose to not do bussiness with WalMar by ragnar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You may want to read the following article to get a more clear picture of how wal-mart operates. I read the article this morning, and it happens to be very timely.

    --
    -- Solaris Central - http://w
  83. um, no, you are so wrong, jeez by Anonymous+Poodle · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but you cannot blame the loss of manufacturing jobs on the unions. True, the AFL-CIO was not the most flexible when dealing with Detroit, but there were other, larger pressures, such as competition from overseas mfg. and tax laws the encouraged US businesses to locate across the border. For a good read, see "America: What Went Wrong?" some of which is available online at:

    http://www.politicalindex.com/wrong1.htm

    1. Re:um, no, you are so wrong, jeez by boskone · · Score: 1

      unions have their place, but they were a big part of why International Harvester folded and we never got a carbon-fiber scout 3.

      (yes it was in development when they closed up...)

  84. What anti-trust? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

    Walmart generally doesn't force companies to do anything. They merely say "we want it at this price and these specs, do it or lose it." Companies produce for Walmart because they want/need the additional business, even if they make marginal profits on it. That and the fact that Walmart lowers prices for everyone. Is it anti-competitive to push sustainable lower prices (for walmart) onto the market place?
    antitrust
    anticompetitive

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  85. So what? My price is what matters. by caveat · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    So Wal-Mart rapes their suppliers into taking a bare few percent profit margin. Guess what - I DON'T CARE! I don't have the luxury of being supported by Mommy and Daddy so I can spend my time bitching about how "immoral" and "evil" Wal-Mart is - in fact, I shop there all the time, because saving a buck is the most important end for me; as long as they can provide cheap electronics I don't care how much they pressure their wholesalers.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:So what? My price is what matters. by HexRei · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because clearly, anyone who is against corporate strongarming must be living off mommy and daddy.
      Guess what, junior? I'm 23, live completely off my own buck and have since I was 17, and I still have the balls to stand against a corporation that abuses capitalism.

    2. Re:So what? My price is what matters. by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I guess you can't be bothered to worry about whether your clothes were made by a seven year old Bangalori kid working fourteen hour days either, or that the few bucks you saved on that DVD player might have been saved by a company moving its manufacturing jobs to a country that has a more "business-friendly" view of environmental and worker safety regulations.

      I could comprehend this sort of ethical myopia if it were regarding some necessity of life. If my personal survival depended on Wal-Mart keeping its prices low, I probably wouldn't care how they did it. But to refuse to worry about their business practices because they supply you with "cheap electronics?" I don't think the word "disgusting" begins to cover your attitude.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    3. Re:So what? My price is what matters. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've dealt with wholesalers in the computer and gaming industries. Unless you're a big customer, they don't even want to give you the time of day and make you jump through all sorts of hoops for the honor of dealing with them. To top things off, the prices they gave me were higher than "street price" for most things.

      If WalMart takes advantage of their clout to treat the wholesalers the same way, I'm just laughing about it. I don't shop there much because they're about 45 minutes from here, but I'll have to make a point of going more often.

    4. Re:So what? My price is what matters. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please. They ain't made by seven year olds working 14 hour days. But, just of the sake of argument, even if they were, it wouldn't make a damn bit of difference. Nobody is forced to work. You don't like it? Well stop showing up dumbass. And what the fuck else would they be doing if they weren't producing cut-rate consumer products for wealthier nations? Nothing, living like an animal out in on the countryside. Furthermore, who the fuck are you to decide what is "ethical." You're just some chicken-shit, ignorant bastard from the rich world spouting off about how superior you are. Well Fuck You. You are a fucking embarrassment to the whole tradition of informed debate. Go back to wherever you're from you low-rent waterhead bastard.

    5. Re:So what? My price is what matters. by shepd · · Score: 1

      A few simple words:

      Value Added Services.

      Did you know I buy items from WalMart at non-sale prices and resell them at higher prices? And that I'm successful at it?

      Why scrape the bottom of the barrel when you can simply get out of it?

      Buy their stuff and make it worth more. May I suggest buying their DVD players and hacking them? People will pay good money for something they can only buy from you, and that they can't do themselves (This idea not reccomended for Americans, due to the DMCA. I'm sure you can figure out something else you can do instead!)

      Stop complaining about WalMart. They're a one trick pony; although they are successful at that, they still only have one trick. The largest complaint, that they hurt local "indie" businesses is a non-sequitur.

      If anything, WalMart can help found smart new small businesses. The only businesses it kills off in the long run are those trying to do the same, but failing at it.

      I guess this is longer than I wanted, but I do have one last thing to say for the "large" business: If you can build something nobody else can (perhaps using a patent as leverage), and WalMart wants it, you have them by the balls. Too bad the failed companies selling *TO* WalMart never realised that (yay vlassic).

      Abuses capitalism? WalMart is the epitome of it, like it or not. Personally, I like it. They put the stupid out of their misery, and force innovation. Only good can come from that.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    6. Re:So what? My price is what matters. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is living out of that 1970 VW micro bus?

    7. Re:So what? My price is what matters. by Tx · · Score: 1

      I could comprehend this sort of ethical myopia if it were regarding some necessity of life. If my personal survival depended on Wal-Mart keeping its prices low, I probably wouldn't care how they did it. But to refuse to worry about their business practices because they supply you with "cheap electronics?" I don't think the word "disgusting" begins to cover your attitude.

      I recently watched a very interesting documentary by Johann Norberg entitled Globalisation is Good (shown on Channel 4 in the UK a few weeks ago) in which he argued quite compellingly that the low labour cost "sweatshop economy" phase is a necessary transitional step from a third world to a successful modern economy. He also showed how the reality for people working in the "sweatshops" is often a lot better than commonly portrayed in the media.

      I think Norberg has a point. The ethical issues are certainly a lot more complicated than people who take your kind of moral tone like to admit. I'm sure you have the best of intentions, but try to look beyond the anti-globalisation banners occasionaly for ethical perspective. Wal-mart is probably helping the countries it buys from, as well as the American consumer, and probably the American economy as well.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    8. Re:So what? My price is what matters. by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1
      " So Wal-Mart rapes their suppliers into taking a bare few percent profit margin. Guess what - I DON'T CARE! I don't have the luxury of being supported by Mommy and Daddy so I can spend my time bitching about how "immoral" and "evil" Wal-Mart is - in fact, I shop there all the time, because saving a buck is the most important end for me; as long as they can provide cheap electronics I don't care how much they pressure their wholesalers."

      It's people like you who make the world a better place to live in.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    9. Re:So what? My price is what matters. by valis · · Score: 1

      Well if you don't care about how they treat suppliers you should think about how they treat the workers and their agressive anti union actions. Especially as someone who claims not to have a lot of money.

      You could always consume less.

    10. Re:So what? My price is what matters. by Aceticon · · Score: 1

      Are you really sure that the brand name product you bought that cost twice as much as the Wal-Mart one isn't exactly the same thing done by the same seven year old Bangalori kid only with a different brand label?

      Last time i saw companies that make brand name products are just as likelly to move its manufacturing jobs to a country that has a more "business-friendly" view of environmental and worker safety regulations as the other ones are.

      I recently read an article on a newspaper about the "world's most expensive dress". It's price is not because of it being designed by some high fashion designer, or being an antiquity, or being made of precious metals and stones - nope, it is so expensive because it's completly made out of brand labels (and it doesn't even look that good).
      Kinda makes you thing what exactly one pays for when buying a branded good ...

    11. Re:So what? My price is what matters. by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid you misunderstood my intentions. I wasn't trying to make the connection [ "Wal-Mart" == "sweatshop labor" || "off brands" == "sweatshop labor" ]. I was simply pointing out the absurdity of praising a company for being able to deliver such cheap goods, while not caring how they came to be so cheap.

      There are occasions where name brands do make a difference. Or used to, anyways. Levi-Strauss was one of the few clothing manufacturers left who still had a significant American manufacturing component. Then they made a deal with Wal-Mart, where Wallyworld would carry a cheaper line of Levi-Strauss jeans. Within a couple of years, Wal-Mart was their biggest customer, and they were forced to move their last 700 American jobs to a more "competitive" area.

      I don't buy name brands. Hell, as a starving college student, most of my clothes come from Deseret Industries (imagine a Mormon-run Goodwill). I also picked up a 19 inch monitor for $20 there. The color's a bit off, but I still consider it a personal victory over the economic forces that conspire to separate me and my money.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    12. Re:So what? My price is what matters. by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Furthermore, who the fuck are you to decide what is "ethical." You're just some chicken-shit, ignorant bastard from the rich world spouting off about how superior you are. Well Fuck You. You are a fucking embarrassment to the whole tradition of informed debate.

      That is one of the most beautifully ironic statements I've ever seen on Slashdot.

      If you read my original post, you'll see that I was speaking hypothetically. I honestly don't know which lines of clothing are produced under what working conditions. However, if presented with compelling evidence, I wouldn't ignore it.

      Who am I to say what is ethical? I'm a firm believer in Kant's categorical imperatives. Specifically, the second: "Act that you use humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." I'm not opposed to helping the third world nations develop by giving them jobs. But I am opposed to the rampant corporate practice of using human beings as just another resource. Their goal is to extract as much labor from the world as they can, while giving back as little as they possibly can. It's a classic case of using another human being as a means to your own ends.

      And I highly doubt that you're posting from a cramped hut in India, which you share with your seven brothers and sisters. Ignorant bastard from the rich world, indeed. If you have the time and connectivity required to post your angry, pointless vulgarities, you're probably as rich an ignorant bastard as I am.
      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    13. Re:So what? My price is what matters. by caveat · · Score: 1

      Hell, as a starving college student

      You forgot "blindly idealistic" :P

      --

      Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    14. Re:So what? My price is what matters. by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Here, educate yourself. Then quit wearing your amorality as a badge of honor. Just because you've gotten too lazy, cynical, and/or greedy to care about the larger consequences of your actions, don't expect me to join you.

      Sure, the world is a complex place, far more so than you or I could ever hope to sort out. But that complexity requires constant interrogation, and a willingness to change in the face of new information. Instead, I get the impression that you've pared the problem down to "How can I get the most for me and mine." It certainly becomes more manageable to see the world in those terms.

      I'm sorry. I know you're mostly being facetious with me, and you probably think I'm taking this way too seriously. But it's a bit of a sore spot with me. I just cannot accept that the world is "good enough," nor do I believe that we are powerless to change it, because we were the ones who created it.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    15. Re:So what? My price is what matters. by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I think the ethical issues are more complex than either side would care to admit. My simplistic view: if a person is able to create twenty pairs of jeans in a day, and they are going to retail for $35 a pair, they've created $700 in wealth[*]. I'm not an expert on supply chains, but if they're being paid $5 a day, it's not because they're doing less than 1% of the total work necessary to get those jeans in the hands of consumers.

      It's not a trivial thing to calculate the value of a person's labor. Capitalism is meant to serve as a good approximation, but I don't think it works when you factor in radically different standards of living, or the huge and self-perpetuating disparities in power and wealth that modern economics has created. So what we are left with is a huge gap between the value of the work third world manufacturing employees do and the compensation they're given.

      I don't have access to Norbert's documentary. Did he have full access to any and all of Nike's plants and workers? Or was he given interviews with select "model workers," with only strictly controlled access to the working areas? Did he look for opinions from disgruntled former employees? Like I said, I haven't seen it, so I can't draw any conclusions one way or the other.

      What bothers me about stories like that is the overall lack of corporate accountability. These countries are so desperate for new jobs, the manufacturers get pretty much a blank check to create whatever working conditions they see fit.

      The other concern I have is, what if this transition never fully happens? What if these workers are used only until they start demanding more equitable compensation? At that point, the manufacturers will simply close up shop and start over in another, less demanding third-world nation. I also worry that, at some point three or four countries down the line, America will be that nation.

      America has been hemorrhaging manufacturing jobs for decades. Now we've been hemmorhaging IT jobs. You know, the sort of white-collar jobs that everyone said that the American economy was transitioning towards. I'm thinking lower-level management jobs will be next. I wouldn't be so worried about this if it looked like it was a trend towards general equality. Instead, it looks like the world is slowly being divided into the rich who own companies, and the poor who serve them.

      * The figures in the preceding example were calculated via the anal extraction method.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    16. Re:So what? My price is what matters. by jeffhallman · · Score: 1

      You're 23? Why, with your vast experience you must know everything by now! Why, you even have balls and stuff!

    17. Re:So what? My price is what matters. by caveat · · Score: 1

      Well...it is sort of guiltily entertaining to press your buttons...i should apologize though, it's not nice to exaggerate my amorality soley to whip up people's emotions.

      I slogged through Kant in high school, and I still prefer James. :P I don't accept that the world as is is good enough, nor that I am powerless to change it, but I'm not a terribly selfless person by nature - I don't believe that the ends justify the means, but at the same time, I do put me and mine first, ahead of any greater moral or ethical issues. And that does involve shopping at Wal-Mart...hell, most of the ethical issues surounding that can of worms deal with the product manufacturers, and Wal-Mart isn't the exclusive distributor for most of those products. Much better to pressure the manufacturers directly, which I do with letters and such. Weak, true, but it is *some* effort.

      --

      Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    18. Re:So what? My price is what matters. by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I appreciate your response, and sorry about linking you to a 300K text file.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    19. Re:So what? My price is what matters. by caveat · · Score: 1

      Ah, no worries, broadband is a beautuful thing sometimes.

      --

      Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    20. Re:So what? My price is what matters. by HexRei · · Score: 1

      Typical ignorant agism- YOU ARE YOUNG AND THEREFORE YOU ARE WRONG.
      Come back when you actually have a point to make, son.

    21. Re:So what? My price is what matters. by HexRei · · Score: 1

      Ooh, an insult from an AC. How meaningful.

    22. Re:So what? My price is what matters. by Rallion · · Score: 0

      It is difficult, yet incredibly satisfying, to steal from Wal-Mart...

    23. Re:So what? My price is what matters. by pmz · · Score: 1

      I am opposed to the rampant corporate practice of using human beings as just another resource.

      What are they besides a resource? How can anyone reasonably expect a corporation of 10,000 or 100,000 employees to be a "family"; that notion is a complete joke.

      The goal should be to allow the free market to generate enough wealth that there will always be options open to people for employment. The role of the government is merely to keep the peace.

  86. Funniest Post Of The Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There should be a "Funniest Post(s) of the Day" for posts such as this.

  87. The aliens were outsourced. by caveat · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The vast vast majority of the illegals were "owned" by a company Wal-Mart outsourced their cleaning to. Anyway, aren't Wal-Mart hating liberals supposed to swallow the line that nobody should be an "illegal" alien because this is the Land of Opportunity and all should be welcome with no restrictions? Just food for thought. (see Cali for a prime example, hell, illegals can get licenses there IIRC)

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:The aliens were outsourced. by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      All those Wal-Mart hating liberals would probably say that if the law didn't make those workers "illegal" than the outsourcing company would not have been able to abuse them into working for less than market rates. Aren't Wal-Mart loving conservatives supposed to swallow the line that government interference in the market is a "bad" thing because the most efficient distribution of resources can only come from markets with no restrictions? Just food for thought. (see Cali for a prime example, hell, Enron did a bang-up job there IIRC)

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    2. Re:The aliens were outsourced. by caveat · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'm neither conservative or a Wal-Mart lover; the parent was Wal-Mart bashing with patently untrue statements, the hallmark of a liberal Wal-Mart basher. W-M does a lot of very shady things, but the illegals simply weren't hired by them, and had very little to do with W-M proper.

      What's wrong with the law declaring people who entered the country illegaly being declared illegal? The abuse of said people by companies is a whole different issue, but saying the law is to blame because it denies these people legal worker status is bleeding-heart liberalism of the worst kind.

      --

      Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    3. Re:The aliens were outsourced. by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Anybody with an ounce of sense recognizes that special tax breaks to Wal-Mart are not fair. The same person recognizes that Enron and the California energy situation were pretty damned far from being unregulated.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    4. Re:The aliens were outsourced. by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Large companies are like large fires. Large fires actually generate their own wind through convection, fanning the flame ever higher.

      Well, until the manage to burn all of the available fuel, laying waste to countrysides at a time.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    5. Re:The aliens were outsourced. by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Absolutely correct, glad to see that at least one person got the analogy.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    6. Re:The aliens were outsourced. by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Thought you were serious. My sarcasm detectors have been way low for a few weeks:)

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  88. Here are three of them by yerricde · · Score: 2, Funny

    Here are your server software licenses, thank you very much. You can even get a license plate.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  89. Lindows != cheaper than Windows. by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    I really hope Wal-Mart decides to sell notebooks with both Lindows and Windows. It will never be mentioned in the press, but many people would buy the cheaper of the two, then chuck Lindows and replace it with a pirated copy of Windows.
    They know that seeing two identical machines side by side in Wal-Mart, people will see how expensive Windows really is.


    Non-Windows (Lindows, SuSE, etc) PC's are not really cheaper at Walmart than Windows PC's. Look at equivalent spec machines, and the difference is very, very little. Don't believe me? Look it up. The $200 PC's are 1.2 Duron's. Once you get to 2+GHz machines (Celeron or P4) at ~$4-500, the price difference is nil.

    Go look it up.

    1. Re:Lindows != cheaper than Windows. by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Non-Windows (Lindows, SuSE, etc) PC's are not really cheaper at Walmart than Windows PC's. Look at equivalent spec machines, and the difference is very, very little. Don't believe me? Look it up.

      That is blatantly false.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    2. Re:Lindows != cheaper than Windows. by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      That is blatantly false.

      Or, you could look at 2 Microtels. 1.2 Duron, 40Gb HD, etc, etc.

      WinXP for $308
      Lindows for $318

      The only difference between the machines is the Win box has 128 MB ram, and the Lin box has 265.

      And, as I said in the parent, once you get to the 2+ Ghz machines for ~4-500, the price difference disappears.

      The Non-Win boxes should be significantly cheaper. But, for whatever reasons Walmart's marketing dept has, they're not.

    3. Re:Lindows != cheaper than Windows. by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      The only difference between the machines is the Win box has 128 MB ram, and the Lin box has 265.

      The Windows box also has no modem or floppy drive.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    4. Re:Lindows != cheaper than Windows. by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      The Windows box also has no modem or floppy drive.

      You're right. I didn't notice that.

  90. Not excellent by ragnar · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm one of those people who hate wal-mart (and I don't shop there as a result), so I'll comment. I'll grant that wal-mart has demonstrated a lot of innovation when it comes to supply lines and inventory management, but I despise their low price mantra.

    As if it wasn't bad enough that the wal-mart chain has destroyed downtown industry all over America in favor of big box stores, if a stateside business can't meet their price point they go with an import. So much for the effort to buy american that Sam Walton pushed when he was alive.

    It is estimated that 7.5 cents of every consumer dollar (excepting auto purchases) go through the wal-mart's registers. They have such a dominant position that businesses can't afford not to do business with wal-mart. For many it is a lose-lose proposition.

    I think there are many wasteful and incompetent american businesses that need to be put out of their misery, but wal-mart is decimating many a good business. Their impact on the US economy is such that we should question seriously the low price mantra.

    --
    -- Solaris Central - http://w
    1. Re:Not excellent by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      So what you are saying is that Wal-mart should raise prices, so a few US suppliers can have their goods sold?

      How bout we eliminate the unions who have forced wages so high that many companies find it cheaper to go off shore?

    2. Re:Not excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Fucking prick. The unions KEEP the labor here in the states. If it weren't for the fear of the unions' revenge, they'd drop those positions in a heartbeat.

    3. Re:Not excellent by ragnar · · Score: 1

      So what you are saying is that Wal-mart should raise prices, so a few US suppliers can have their goods sold?


      In a manner of speaking yes, but let me qualify this answer. I believe that wal-mart does a disservice to people by emphasizing lower price with no regard to cost. As a matter of definition, price is what the consumer pays and cost is what the vendor pays to sell the product. When wal-mart leverages its market dominance to demand ever thinner deltas between cost and price it forces businesses to become more efficient (good) and/or to cut corners (bad). From my observations the latter has occurred too much over the past decade.

      --
      -- Solaris Central - http://w
    4. Re:Not excellent by pmz · · Score: 1

      downtown industry

      Downtown industry has been obselete for decades.

      if a stateside business can't meet their price point they go with an import

      Not only is this their right, but it is the right thing to do.

      They have such a dominant position that businesses can't afford not to do business with wal-mart.

      Oh, like Sears, Target, Amazon.com, etc.etc.etc. don't exist. Start small, be happy with a slice of the pie, take on Wal-Mart when the time is right.

      wal-mart is decimating many a good business.

      Perhaps their time has simply come? The stubborn need to preserve the present is always a human failing, especially in light of the EU and Asia growing by leaps and bounds soon to eclipse the USA. In short, adapt or die. It's simply how the world works, and no pork-laden politician will stop it or change its course for long.

    5. Re:Not excellent by ragnar · · Score: 1

      Downtown industry has been obselete for decades.

      I guess it depends on how you define progress, but the regionalization (and eventual globalization) of business is not all good news. While prices have decreased and products have been commoditized (clearly related processes) there are other losses. Downtown businesses tend to cost more, but on average they provide a better service. There are exceptions, naturally.

      Not only is this their right [to choose imports over stateside], but it is the right thing to do.

      I believe the right thing would be for consumers to accept a reasonable delta between the cost of an item (the business expense) and the price (what the consumer spends). If consumers expect the delta to approach too low a level it forces the business to make compromises. While american companies abide by admittedly dodgy clean water and air laws, our foreign counterparts pollute with abandon, not to speak of fundamental labor issues. I contend that perpetuating the problem isn't the right thing to do.

      The stubborn need to preserve the present is always a human failing, especially in light of the EU and Asia growing by leaps and bounds soon to eclipse the USA. In short, adapt or die. It's simply how the world works, and no pork-laden politician will stop it or change its course for long.

      I agree that political solutions don't work. I favor educational reform, akin to what I'm doing right here -- telling people why they should pay 10% more to purchase goods in a socially responsible way.

      As for other markets eclipsing the US, I think if this fear is true then it is incumbent on us to support local manufacturing, lest we empower foreign markets.

      --
      -- Solaris Central - http://w
    6. Re:Not excellent by pmz · · Score: 1

      While american companies abide by admittedly dodgy clean water and air laws, our foreign counterparts pollute with abandon, not to speak of fundamental labor issues.

      The other countries are not unlike the USA was 100 years ago. They won't be like that forever as they generate wealth for themselves. The people there will be constantly seeking a better standard of living and their future will most likely parallel the history of the USA to a great extent.

      I favor educational reform, akin to what I'm doing right here -- telling people why they should pay 10% more to purchase goods in a socially responsible way.

      Education is one way to create markets for goods, and it is very much your right to pursue this. Symphonies wouldn't exist without people who love music, for example. However, these markets tend to be niches, like a symphony, because the inertia leading education is so high. People will really only react on a large scale once the damage is done, such as is the case in California with smog and emissions laws.

      I think if this fear is true then it is incumbent on us to support local manufacturing, lest we empower foreign markets.

      The only workable way to preserve domestic manufacturing is in the name of national defense. The only way that the DoD can enforce this preservation is through their purchase orders. For example, it would be pretty dumb for the DoD to allow all steel production to get shipped overseas, so they can require that all new tanks are made with domestically-produced steel. They have to understand that the price premium and lower quality of this steel is the price they pay for preserving some infrastructure in case of a war.

  91. Re:Mods on crack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A) If society was unhappy with that situation, they'd avoid shopping there.

    B) If someone isn't happy with their pay, they need to upgrade their skills

    C) Walmart sells books to accomplish B. Employees could read them during breaks for free.

  92. Geographic monopoly by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Do they have any monopoly on anything whatsoever?

    Yes, a geographic monopoly in semi-isolated areas, where Wal-Mart is the only store for several miles.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Geographic monopoly by tftp · · Score: 1
      Hmm, if I build a newsstand at North Pole would I be then branded a monopolist? :-)

      They are not a monopoly, IMO, as long as others can come and have a piece of their business. MS *is* a monopoly because nobody else can make Windows. And even then they got slapped not for being a monopoly (all s/w houses are), but for abusing this position.

  93. Checking the $ on a mac only takes a few clicks by Phat_Tony · · Score: 1

    eMacs, which include a Sony 17" totally flat 1280 * 1024 monitor built in that runs $250 seperately, start at $799. And that comes with a Combo DVD-ROM/CD-RW a 32 MB ATI Radeon 7500, Firewire ports, a large included suite of software, and many other things that would be expensive add-ons for the $300 Lindows machines.

    Of course, if you don't want the better OS, optical drive, included monitor, fast graphics processor, connectivity, etc, then the Mac's a bad deal. Apple's never gone for the low-end market, and the $300 Lindows Microtel machine is low-end. Add on the extra stuff the Mac comes with, even using price-watch prices, and you quickly approach the price of the Mac, and that's for a cobbled together system of third party stuff vs. an engineered, out-of-the-box machine with the best relaibaility record and customer service of any computer manufacturer. (According to Consumer reports, for several years in a row.)

    Don't try to make it sound like you're in for $1800 to get a comparable mac, and don't pretend that because lower-end macs come with monitors, that somehow professional Macs are the real alternative to cheap PC's. My guess is that most buyers do end up using a monitor anyway. Get whatever system best suits your needs, and Macs don't come without lots of extras. I haven't seen any computers with similiar extras for much less though.

    --
    Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
  94. Re:Somewhat offtopic, but... PCs have gotten CHEAP by RevRa · · Score: 1

    Yah, the SunRay systems; they're heavily used at Sun offices/campuses. Cheap too, something like $100 per Sunray. Of course, you need a beefy connection and backend server to push all that stuff out to the users.

    Our office has something like 50 users at any given time and I know the backend is a 6CPU E4500 with like 8GB ram. I never have a problem with latency or program load delay or anything.

    I don't think this is practical for a home solution however. ;-)

    --
    - Kate
    "DNA is life. The rest is just translation."
  95. Re:They can choose to not do bussiness with WalMar by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Economies progress by making jobs more efficient so resources are freed for new jobs. You can't make new products unless some old product goes away or becomes more efficiently made.

    It's hard to figure out who gets retrained in what way and how much. No system could be perfect. That Wal-Mart makes companies more efficient is not to be denied. That some companies don't adapt and go out of business, well, their workers and capital go into other businesses eventually, and the economy gradually becomes more efficient. If there were no unemployment benefits, the economy would become more efficient faster, but more people would suffer. If unemployment benefits were too easy to get and keep, the economy would progress more slowly. The trick is figuring out the best compromise. No one can ever know where that line is, and it keeps moving.

    </LongWindedRamble>

  96. Re:Dude: You're getting a Walmart! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "Dude: You're getting a Walmart!"

    If you see a red dot floating around your house, duck. It's Dell enforcing their trademark.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  97. Re:Go XP by lowtekneq · · Score: 1

    Jesus I forgot how retarded the slashdot crowd really is, OS X was just an example, Linux or the many others would have fit just as well

    --
    Carpe meam simiam!
  98. I wonder if these will run Lindows or XP. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    I hope they run XP. Otherwise, it's an expensive proposition. Suddenly a $750 laptop becomes a $950 laptop. I know this isn't going to be a popular comment, but not everybody can or wants to run Linux.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:I wonder if these will run Lindows or XP. by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Know a piracy-happy geek with cable or ADSL and either alt.binaries.* or P2P access? It's a $750 laptop.

  99. Agreed - mod parent up by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The original poster made valid points about WalMart, an institution that is responsible for widespread labor abuses, social control of its employees, deflating local economies, and spreading the box store culture of underemployment.

  100. Re:Damn, I'm OLD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this wouldve been more fun, albeit a bit more time intensive, but seeing the look on the epileptic's face when they saw this would be priceless!
    c:\>debug
    -a
    mov ax,a000
    mov es,ax
    mov ax,0013
    int 10
    xor dl,dl
    xor di,di
    mov cx,7d00
    mov ah,dl
    mov al,dl
    rep
    stosw
    inc dl
    jmp 010c

    -g

  101. Re:Damn, I'm OLD. by Bob+Bitchen · · Score: 1

    Yeah you may have thought you got away with something. But they had your home phone number!

    --
    http://tinyurl.com/3t236
  102. Re:Lindows or XP? Lycoris by Doc+Squidly · · Score: 1

    I know they've got some systems that come with Lycoris Desktop/LS installed.

    --
    I think I think, therefore I think I am.
  103. Amazon to Offer Amazon Notebooks? by kishphish · · Score: 1

    Where goes Wal-mart, there follows Amazon..I would imagine we will see the following news item soon, 'Amazon to Offer Amazon Notebooks'.

  104. Actually, they are by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/77/walmart.htm l

    It's not the "Mom and Pop" store thats getting hosed - they can never compete with the Walmarts OR CompUSA's on price.

    Since most Americans no longer believe in causality (thank you Mr. Kant and Mr. Hume), feel free to simply ignore this.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  105. You flatter me :) by caveat · · Score: 1

    I don't think the word "disgusting" begins to cover your attitude.

    Aw, how flattering...I prefer "utterly amoral" myself though, "coldly pragmatic" if you're being very nice =)

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  106. Re:Somewhat offtopic, but... PCs have gotten CHEAP by boskone · · Score: 1

    are you on NT4 with roaming profiles? Perhaps I have my wires crossed, but it seems weird that your domain is administered that way.

    As for the SunRay's, yes, they are way, way, cool. I've played with them. Sun's recommendatino is for switched 100Mbit to each sunray though, so Ithink they use the LAN pretty heavily.

  107. putting oneself out of a job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    parent has a really interesting idea:
    "Americans who shop at Wal-Mart are shopping themselves out of a job."

    since wal-mart is the largest employer in the us and one the largest retailers (the largest?), their footing is secured.

    it is scary to imagine a bleak future:

    wherein so many are out of work (as many are now)
    and thusly take a position (IT at the local hq, sales, tech support) at the institution of Wal-Mart.
    it snowballs and soon not only are they still the largest employer whom most everyone works for,
    but they are also the source where most everyone purchases most everything (from food to toiletries, consumer electronics to computers).

    while it wont happen (hopefully, right doj?? right??), it is disconcerting and scifi creepy.

  108. Don't take this the wrong way, but... by LenE · · Score: 3, Informative
    I even set it up so I can administer it remotely via SSH (or even webmin tunneled over SSH if I'm feeling really lazy).

    What happens if, God forbid, you get hit by a bus, or a drunk driver, or if you were kidnapped by a marauding band of scantily clad amazons? How will your parents manage their new computer? Do they know how to do any administration tasks like installing software, or installing a new printer?

    I don't wish this on anybody, but in a previous job, I had to create a "hit by a bus" book, so that other people could do any of the frequent admin tasks that they might need, in case I was ever incapacitated. Now granted, most of these things (new users and backup-recovery) are not needed on a home machine, but if you have to ssh into your parent's box for any reason, then it isn't parent-safe enough.

    That being said, I've set my parents up with the most parent-safe setup I can imagine. Yes it cost a bit more than $500, but I know that they won't have to find someone who knows KDE or Gnome, or how to re-compile a kernel when they want to plug in a new digital camera. I got them an iMac, and I never have to deal with administration of their machine. It cost a bit more, but I don't loose sleep over worrying if it is working or not.

    -- Len

    1. Re:Don't take this the wrong way, but... by pherris · · Score: 1
      LenE (29922) said:
      That being said, I've set my parents up with the most parent-safe setup I can imagine. Yes it cost a bit more than $500, but I know that they won't have to find someone who knows KDE or Gnome, or how to re-compile a kernel when they want to plug in a new digital camera. I got them an iMac, and I never have to deal with administration of their machine. It cost a bit more, but I don't loose sleep over worrying if it is working or not.

      Yes, Macs are much easier to use, have an excellent GUI, simple to admin and simply never crash (the last OS X crash I had was with an early beta and even then had to unplug a FW drive during a write). But they have their flaws:

      Repairs can take forver. Three years ago I bought an iMac DV. After a month of use the monitor died. In the repair shop for three weeks, brought it home and the monitor was toast (heavy magenta hue). Back to the shop. An additional four weeks later my iMac was still waiting for a new CRT. Bitched at Apple everyday for another three weeks when they finally sent me a new machine. If your mac has a hardware failure (which is uncommon but does happen) you are totally fscked.

      Adding software [running Gentoo] and easier and cheaper than a Mac. Gentoo's portage system is wild stuff. An one line command can install most applications while you do other stuff. There seems to be a greater overall selection of Linux apps than Mac. I know about fink but it's not the same. IMO if you use mostly apps from fink you might as well switch to Gentoo.

      I run an eMac (a very nice machine) which is used for video work and kid's games right next to my PIII NetVista running Gentoo. Where's all my data saved: on the PIII. Macs are great but if my big blue has any kind of hardware failure I can be back up in hours and not weeks.

      Considering cost, usability (for basic web surfing, email, etc.) and remote access my vote goes to Linux. Now if his parents wanted to do video work or photoshop stuff then my vote goes to Mac (you've got to pay more for that stuff).

      BTW, an eMac similar to the grandparent's specs would be twice the price and, IMO, not "a bit more". To some people $500 is a lot of money.

      This isn't Mac "bashing" but more like being a Mac "realist".

      --
      "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
    2. Re:Don't take this the wrong way, but... by Nalgas+D.+Lemur · · Score: 1

      I can't compare directly to your experience, but with their laptops, the repair turnaround is extremely fast. In my experience, I call Apple one day, and I have a box at my door the next day to ship the laptop to them. It came back within two days of when I shipped it, which is almost ridiculous, considering that it has to be shipped there and back plus repaired in that time. I'm assuming that with desktops, it depends at least partly on the specific place you take it to be repaired. I haven't had a problem with one that needed to be repaired, but the local Apple Store ordered a replacement power adapter for me, and I was able to pick it up within a couple days. Every time I've dealt with Apple in person or over the phone, they've taken good care of me, and stuff gets done in a hurry. From your post, I guess it seems not everyone is that lucky, though.

    3. Re:Don't take this the wrong way, but... by pherris · · Score: 1
      I can't compare directly to your experience, but with their laptops, the repair turnaround is extremely fast.

      I've got a friend that has had two different powerbooks in for five trips to the repair shop. Everytime they were returned within a week. Powerbook service (and mail in service for that matter) is extremely fast. Part of my problem was Apple insisted I take it to a local repair shop and not mail it back.

      Every time I've dealt with Apple in person or over the phone, they've taken good care of me, and stuff gets done in a hurry.

      Apple's telephone service is either great or really shitty. When things go well they go well. If something goes wrong you're totally screwed. This really isn't an Apple "exclusive". Everyone's sales/support sucks for desktop machines (ok, maybe IBM is still good).

      --
      "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
  109. Re:Somewhat offtopic, but... PCs have gotten CHEAP by really? · · Score: 1

    Why not? From mwhat I have seen it scales down quite well. A dual CPU big ass noisy box in the basement and cheap terminals all around the house ... no problem.

    Of course, setting things up is not for my grand mother ...

    --

    "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
  110. Re:Somewhat offtopic, but... PCs have gotten CHEAP by really? · · Score: 1

    right you are, and "cheap" is the problem. I would trather have "inexpensive" or 'good value.'

    --

    "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
  111. Re:They can choose to not do bussiness with WalMar by Malcontent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's actually a race to the bottom. Every year walmart grows and as it grows it squeezes out competitors and ships jobs overseas. If things continue their trend they will have a monopoly in just a few years. What happens then?

    I'll tell you what happens jobs leave china and go to cambodia or africa or someplace. They continue to to shift to countries where people are more destitute thereby leading to boom and bust economies all over the world. Eventually the chinese will want a 10 cent raise and the factories will all close up and move.

    I predict that one day in the not too distant future some country will enslave an unpopular minority and the services of their slaves to walmart for the cost of subsidence. These slaves will work all day for bread and water making socks and t-shirts with the walmart brand on them.

    At that moment we will have achieved maximum efficiency.
    The natural tendency in a darwinian economy is a monopoly.

    --

    War is necrophilia.

  112. Re:Great! by eskayp · · Score: 1

    Egads! Aliens, Wal-Martians, an organized plot to dominate earth; good thing someone is sounding the alarm. And to think " I married a monster from outer space " . Little did I realize she was part of a nefarious plot to overthrow man. Now I understand why she is always trying to control everything I do. Good thing I found out about this. I'll just wear my tinfoil pyramid hat to bed. That'll stop her alien Wal-Martian brain beams from doing further damage. Tomorrow we storm Bentonville. Not off topic -- just off planet. ;-)

    --
    I didn't desert Windows; Windows deserted me: BSOD
  113. May I ask where your family came from? by nuntius · · Score: 1

    How many generations ago did they immigrate? 3? 4? ... 6? Probably not more than that.

    I bet you don't even know.

    Did you not notice that America came out of both WWI and WWII stronger than we went in? Why? There is a lot of evidence pointing at the immigrants who came here shortly before and even during these outbreaks.

    What have immigrants done for America?
    Chinese labor laid much of the tracks for the first transcontinental railroad. German labor worked the Pennsylvania coal mines (my family's heritage). Tesla brought us AC electricity. European WWII engineers founded the US atomic and rocket/space programs.

    To this day, many of the brightest professors in US universities were born overseas.

    In fact, there are too many major contributions to list, considering that most Americans are not Native Americans (e.g. American Indians).

    Breaking that rant to answer your question, shipping immigrants back to Cuba or China or Columbia or any other horribly inhumane repressive government is a great crime to these people, to our country, and to all of humanity. How much harm could these people cause us? Not much. How much benefit could they bring? Everything.

    This message brought to you by a classically trained, free-market-loving, death-penalty-supporting, conservative pig.

    1. Re:May I ask where your family came from? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Oddly as a college dropout, taoist, socialist, bohemian, redical I agreed completely with your post on the role of immigrants in America.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  114. Finally by BigBuckHunter · · Score: 3, Funny

    A computer light enough to place on my particle-board desk (purchased at wallmart) without breaking it!

    No, You shut-up!!!!

  115. Re:Dude: You're getting a Walmart! by whovian · · Score: 1

    Where we live, those red dots are the seasonal influx of shelter-seeking ladybugs!

    --
    To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
  116. Slashdot moderation. by Kjella · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1. Read headline "PR Release!"
    2. ???
    3. +1, Informative.

    Might I suggest the following:
    "2. Check that the content is informative"?

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  117. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Were you hoping that would be funny?

  118. Re:They can choose to not do bussiness with WalMar by Hobbex · · Score: 1

    Thank you.

    Comments like this, even drowning in mass of drivel about how paying the lowest price possible is "abusing capitalism" are what keep me coming back to this page.

  119. Re:They can choose to not do bussiness with WalMar by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

    Even Darwin thought evolution was divinely inpired. What you describe is an artificial creation of man. And note, 4 billion years of evolution have not produced what you described. Could there be a reason perhaps? Could it be that hugely efficient things aren't very good at adapting? If you had one species of organism that dominated the entire planet, all it would take is one virus, one shift in climate to wipe it out. Entirely.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  120. Re:Damn, I'm OLD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey man, don't trash the TRS-80. It's the fastest boooting machine I've ever seen running a Microsoft product.

    1 sec boot for the TRS-80 running "Microsoft #1" from ROM vs. 5 minute boot for a Dell running Windows XP. Ah, innovation!

  121. Keep in mind... by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 1

    Even though Walmart.com sells Lindows and Lycoris machines, Walmart stores do not. So the odds of them carrying Lindows or Lycoris notebooks is slimmer still.

  122. Re:Somewhat offtopic, but... PCs have gotten CHEAP by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

    Hmm... NT4 acted like THAT? I know Win2K/XP automatically grabs the profile from the server, and does the merging right there. If there are conflicting files, they're taken care of on logoff with a box similar to that that you get when you copy a file to a directory that already has that file.

  123. Re:Lindows or XP? Lycoris by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

    They use SuSE, too. I'd personally prefer a SuSE laptop, thank you very much... BTW, Lycoris isn't TOO bad for computer newbs, but it looks like it sucks for Windows-proficient users switching to Linux. That's where SuSE fits in.

  124. Really? by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

    "A lot of working families are a heck of a lot better off because discount stores like walmart help them stretch their dollars farther"

    My own unscientific study shows me that Wal Mart prices are pretty much the same as everywhere else; and in most cases you can get far better prices if you're willing to shop at discount stores.

    I'm not anti-walmart; I think they have a decent selection of stuff and have brought that selection to a lot of small towns, but their pricing is nothing to write home about.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  125. Re:They can choose to not do bussiness with WalMar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That some companies don't adapt and go out of business, well, their workers and capital go into other businesses eventually..."

    Other businesses like the ones overseas... =p

  126. Re:Damn, I'm OLD. by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

    We did something similar, except it was more like 10 BEEP 20 GOTO 10 (I can't remember the exact syntax for generating a sound) Used to drive the salesman who couldnt figure out how to stop it nuts!

  127. 50% Mayflower, 50% legal Polish immigrant by caveat · · Score: 1

    Actually there's evidence that the Waites were here pre-Mayflower, but I shan't harp on that. My father's side of the family came from Poland in the Teens, legally through Ellis Island.

    I never said I was opposed to immigration, far from it; believe me, I know this country was and still is being built on the backs of immigrants - but I'd rather not see them treated like slave labor. One of the best examples is their safety - I live on Long Island, where there's a HUGE population of illegal Mexicans used as day laborers. One of the biggest reasons contractors hire them isn't the low low pay, but rather the fact that the contractor can flagrantly violate every OSHA standard at the jobsite, and when one of the laborers is maimed or killed, the GC can simply dump them in the appropriate place (ER front door, Moriches Bay, etc.) and go pick up a new one on the corner the next morning, with no annoying government inspectors swarming the job site. Basically, they're commodities rather than humans. Even more so to they coyotes out West; don't even get me started on the horrors of human smuggling and the rapaciousness of those that charge $3000 a head to sneak Mexicans into the hellish work environs in the US.

    Legal immigration is a whole different ballgame. I think it's currently way too difficult to get in above board and get all your work permits and visas; I wholeheartedly support the creation of a "manual labor" class of visa that would be very easy to get and would entitle the day laborers to basic health, safety and wage guidelines, as well as taxing them at a lower rate, for basic health and human services (but no SS or other long-term benefits).

    Now...where did I say that immigration is bad in my previous posts? I said ILLEGAL immigration is a Bad Thing, which it is - it endangers the immigrants and bleeds much-needed tax money out of the government. I'm all for the enrichment of the US by people from around the world, I just want them to play by some sort of rules and be accounted for. Of course, those escaping for political reasons should bloody likely be granted asylum, and then given proper paperwork as outlined above. God. When did the world turn so black and white, to where opposing illegal entry==racism?

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  128. Re:Mods on crack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I call bullshit. Last year my son was a full-time college student and a full-time WalMart employee. He made nearly $18,000. You just have to work hard to get ahead. WalMart shouldn't be considered anything more than a temporary job or second income job. That is, unless you plan on a career in management at WalMart (and that's not too hard to do, either).

  129. in the words of Frank Zappa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's not just a poncho -- it's a SEARS poncho.

  130. Re:They can choose to not do bussiness with WalMar by deuist · · Score: 1

    In addition, Warren Buffet has claimed that Wal-Mart is soley responsible for keeping down inflation in America.

  131. +1 Informative?? by ewhenn · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    +1 Funny yes, not +1 Informative

  132. Yeah, here's a PICTURE!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exclusive picture of the prototype:

    Picture

  133. My apologies by nuntius · · Score: 1

    I apologize for attacking you earlier; I misunderstood your position. This misunderstanding sparked my personal peeve against the idea that it is illegal for someone to seek freedom.

    Now, to step back onto the soapbox:
    Unfortunately, many people do oppose all immigration, and they are often the ones who establish immigration policies. If someone wants to risk their life to leave their country and come here, then let them.

    One common example of screwed up INS regulations:
    Most foreign college students can't legally work off campus; as a result the non-rich ones either get stuck as cheap labor for housing or the cafeteria - or they get cheated by the restaurant owner they try working for. I've personally seen both happen during my college years.

    A nice side effect of legalizing all immigration is that there is then no such thing as an illegal immigrant. This will by definition kill the smuggling trade, and then we can easily prosecute any company abusing any laborers in America. All that's needed is to abolish quotas and a few similar restrictions; the rest of the system seems mostly functional.

    laissez faire - the true foundation of capitalism and conservative politics

  134. Nascar the official brand of Walmart by das_katz_socrates · · Score: 0

    At our local Walmart everything has Nascar plastered all over it, so I wouldn't be surprised to see a big number 3 on the case of these notebooks.

    --
    This sig has no nutritional value...
  135. Someday, something will kill WalMart by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you read the history of the original catalog retailers, like Montgomery Wards and Sears, you will find that they were hated when they first started expanding, because they were killing small town stores (that had no competition and could keep prices high). They would organize catalog burnings. Now of course, Sears is struggling and Ward is gone. Things change, especially in retailing.

    There are a number of other retailers you could throw in the "once seen as powerful destuctive forces, now pretty much gone" - Woolworth, K-Mart, A&P. All were seen as destroying "mom and pop" stores, and all are pretty much destroyed, or at least not nearly as powerful as they used to be.

    Even now, Target seems to be beating the heck out of Wal-Mart. I know tons of people who shop at Target, myself included, while I know no walmart regulars.

    So I predict that eventually something will replace walmart, in the same way it replaced a ton of businesses that "nobody could compete with".

  136. Re:Somewhat offtopic, but... PCs have gotten CHEAP by The+Woodworker · · Score: 1

    If you support an organization with 1000 people at 20 locations, getting that many CDs burned and out to your staff would be difficult in the case of a critical security fix (where you want your systems updated in minutes instead of days).

    Now, use a CDRW instead of a CD, and have the drives in every computer (costs only slightly more than a normal CDROM). Or use USB Flash pendrives. I got a 256 MB at Best Buy for $30! You can push the updates out over the network and just have a small support staff for user created problems (I deleted my files and emptied trash; how do I get them back), hardware issues, and network/server administration.

    In any case, with applications being moved to the network I see the computer being a modular cog in the equation. I could be swapped quickly with little or no problems.

    --
    Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach him to fish and he'll wipe out the species.
  137. Re:They can choose to not do bussiness with WalMar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The natural tendency in a darwinian economy is a monopoly.


    Bullshit.

    Monopolies can only exist as a result of government interference.
  138. Re:They can choose to not do bussiness with WalMar by Malcontent · · Score: 1

    "4 billion years of evolution have not produced what you described."

    Nonsense. There have been many slave based economies in the past. Slavery has always been a big part of human commerce. Whether it was the ancient greeks and romans or the chinese dynasties or the US itself. Have read any history at all? How can you possibly claim slave labor has not been utilized for commerce?

    Eventually slavery was phased out because it was recognized that social darwinism and pure capitalism was extremely bad for a significant minory of the population. More rights based structures like republics were invented and of course more socialist policies like taxes were put into place. By giving minorities rights and by re-circulating money from the rich to the poor we achieved some sort of a balance whereby the slave class was eliminated and the middle class didn't starve enough to want to revolt.

    If left to themselves the rich will always become richer and the powerful will always become more powerful. The art of society is to slow down or halt that process so that everybody has a fair shake.

    --

    War is necrophilia.

  139. Please reconsile 1 and 2 by glrotate · · Score: 1

    You argue:

    The low prices of Walmart represents deflation. Deflation is bad because it can defer purchasing of products.

    and

    I see many people who obviously are not hurting for money shopping at Walmart. The reason the do so is because they can have more stuff.

    You argue that low prices at Walmart cause us to buy too little and too much.

    Lower prices as a result of cutting out the friction of commerce are good. What Walmart has done to bring efficienty to trade by eliminating waste and redundancies makes every dollar I earn worth more. That is good. I can buy more things and less overhead with my paycheck. Stuff makes me happy. I like being able to afford 3 new movies to watch instead of 2, 12 pairs of underware instead of 6, more towels etc. If you're offended that things CAN facilitate happiness then that's your problem. Stop being a puritan.

  140. Damn, You're OLD. by Doc+Squidly · · Score: 1

    Wow, you are old. But I like your style.

    --
    I think I think, therefore I think I am.
  141. Reverse solution by billcopc · · Score: 1

    So Wal-Mart is destroying the western world by nearly forcing suppliers to outsource and import goods from the land of sweatshops. Solution ? Nuke the land of sweatshops. If you destroy whatever is judged 'inferior' then there is no more comparison to be made and thus the power battle ends.

    I don't mean this in a racist or nazi way. We have to eliminate the difference so that there will no longer be an incentive to financially abuse the less-favored societies of the world. Killing is one way, striving towards global unity is another; but as long as there will be GW Bushes, Saddams and Bin Ladens on this planet there will be no world peace and equality, because for every gun you fire, someone else will get pissed and fire back. It's funny that we are taught cooperation and sharing as young children, but the leaders of our world are little more than tired old bullies with bigger gangs.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  142. Re:Go XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The word cheaper was never used...

  143. Re:They can choose to not do bussiness with WalMar by chiph · · Score: 1

    I've known about Wal-Mart's pressure on it's suppliers for a long time. Chrysler (now Daimler-Chrysler) did it for years -- how many tenths of a cent can they force you to shave off your price in order to keep their business.

    If I were in the position of selling to Wal-Mart, and they came to me and said "You know, you sold us this item last year for $8.73. This year we won't pay more than $8.11 for it." And if that new price was below my cost -- there's just no way I can sell that item to them and stay in business. What am I going to do? Make it up on volume? At that point I've no alternative but to tell them to go buy their widgets elsewhere and lay off part (maybe most of) my workforce.

    Yes, it's capitalism in action. I accept that.

    But at the same time these kinds of tactics leave a bad taste in my mouth. As a result, I haven't shopped at Wal-Mart in two years (I'm going to Target instead), and dropped my Sam's Club membership in favor of BJ's Wholesale.

    Chip H.

  144. Re:They also get governments to steal land for the by ratamacue · · Score: 1

    Offtopic perhaps, but you can hardly blame Wal-Mart for taking advantage of government power. The "right" to invoke force as a means to an end belongs to government, not Wal-Mart. Government holds the key.

    The problem is that power exists, not that power can be abused. It is inevitable that power will be abused, and here we are looking at a textbook example.

  145. Fashion? by bluGill · · Score: 1

    sure at one time laptops where fashion accessories. Haven't been for years though. Salesmen, and onsite techs have no other way to get a computer, yet they need to enter orders. Even when you are just at the office laptops are handy. Nothing makes meeting minutes more accurate, or more useful than to have them in your inbox before you get back to your cube. (Though I only know one guy who was that quick, it was appreceated)

    I remember when cell phones were a fashion accesory. Salesmen soon changed that becuase they were useful, and today they are essential. When the 486 was king many people were already going to laptop as the main comptuer, because it isn't that much more, and was useful when (not if) you travel. Travel includes going home at night when you work tech support. (most nights you didn't get a call)

  146. compare to others by bluGill · · Score: 1

    Sure, compare walmart to anyone else... The McDonalds was given the land they sit on, when the city bought the orchard that was there and gave it to someone who would pay [more] taxes. WalMart wanted in, and got a few things (mostly land to build on). Latter Target wanted in, but wanted what walmart got, plus a stoplight where one was not needed. Then the city decied they wanted more industry, so they bought a lot of land and basicly gave it away. (for the taxes they will collect latter, I have no idea if it works) Everyone does it in other words.

    Several years ago WalMart wanted to upgrade to a super WalMart. It was blocked for several years, by the "small" grocer that bought a Cub franchise (he had a super market before, but Cub is about 3 times the size) to drive out the other small grocers and didn't want to compete someone who could compete with him.

  147. Google cache by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Google has a cache , but this has been down a while - makes you wonder if they've gone TU.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  148. Maybe ISPs could offer this? by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

    You're right - setting it up would be difficult for non-technies, but with a DSL/Cable connection, the ISP could offer this functionality very easily.

    The ISP could run multiple in-memory XSessions with OpenOffice + Mozilla + Mail on a cluster of powerful servers. The subscriber buys a $200 basic machine, and gets an AOL-type setup CD from the ISP. This CD sets up an XServer on the subscribers machine (this connects to the ISPs servers), and installs icons for email, office, etc. etc. on their taskbar.

    The moment the subscriber clicks on, say, the email icon, a connection is made to their cached XSession on the ISP's cluster, a local window opens, and they are reading emails 200 milliseconds after their mouseclick. Because the XSession is cached in-memory on the ISPs server, and the subscriber's emails are *also* on the ISPs server, this would be faster than an email app running from local disk (provided the network is OK :). The ISP could provide SAMBA shares to save files locally. Also, there would be no bandwidth charges between the ISP and the customer, so they could use the off-peak time to download large files.

    So the subscriber gets:
    1. A properly configured environment
    2. *Speed* (no delays fetching mail, no rendering delays, no "slow-OpenOffice-startup" delays
    3. Back-ups of all documents, all emails
    4. Ability to access this setup from net cafes (using Java applets + VNC)
    5. Working in a familiar home environment (Windows, Linux, OSX... whatever supports an XServer).

    The ISP gets:
    1. Lower bandwidth utilization (because the ISP controls the browser, they can optimize it with caching proxies)
    2. Possible media-plays (since the ISP *partially* controls the subscribers machine - because their software runs on it - they could, say, schedule downloads of say, news programs that are tailored to the subscribers interests)
    3. Fewer tech support hassles ("Just put the CD in your CD-drive and press 'OK' Ma'am")
    4. Happier customers
    5. More "stickiness" with the customer

    6. Profit!!!

  149. Re:They can choose to not do bussiness with WalMar by Herkum01 · · Score: 1
    You hear alot about creating efficiency. What Wal-

    Mart is not efficiency, it is a slow starvation. In much the same way a person who keeps getting thinner and thinner because they don't get enough to eat. Eventually they do, but every says its OK because the Market says so. BS! Cheaper prices to strangle the economy so that you can make a buck is not making a strong economy, it is makes the US a weaker one. All of its investments are moved from the US and moved to China.

    It does not help anyone to move ALL of those jobs over to China, someone here has still got to work and earn some cash too.

  150. Apology accepted, my good man. by caveat · · Score: 1

    ahh, a little civility in this whole debate - thank you sir, you're a rare breed...apology accepted, and let me apologize for being snippy with my reply.

    I'm not a huge fan of totally unrestricted immigration though; I hate to raise the specter/strawman of terrorism, but I do get a very uneasy feeling at the concept of letting anybody waltz into the DMV and get a license without having to even prove legal status - IMHO, that's a security hole big enough to drive a nuke-bearing truck through.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  151. buy a sunday paper by sootman · · Score: 1

    and look at the ads for circuit city, best buy, compusa, office depot, office max, etc. I see notebooks for $699-$799 every week, sometimes $650, and once, $550. Hell, go to dell.com/tv--they've got a $799 notebook right now and every day. 2.4G celeron, 256 MB, 14" screen, combo drive. Or go to store.apple.com and click the red 'special deals' tag. stock varies but they've currently got G3 iBooks for $799.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  152. Here's an article about Walmart in the WSJ by abhisarda · · Score: 1

    (READ THIS ARTICLE AND DRAW YOUR CONCLUSIONS)

    PAGE ONE
    NO COMPETITION?

    China's Rush to Convenience
    11/03/03

    Page One: Competition in China Erodes Profit Margins
    10/13/03

    Heard in Asia: Chinese Market May Become Tough Going for Global Firms
    06/17/03

    Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (WMT)

    PRICE
    CHANGE
    U.S. dollars 57.96
    -0.32
    11/12

    Behind China's Export Boom,
    Heated Battle Among Factories

    As Wal-Mart, Others Demand
    Lowest Prices, Managers
    Scramble to Slash Costs
    By PETER WONACOTT
    Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

    SHAJING, China -- Under the corrugated-metal roofs of Ching Hai Electric Works Co., hundreds of workers toil in six plants to meet orders for millions of small appliances. Inside one factory, ex-farmers bend over a clanging conveyer belt where they turn squid-shaped hunks of steel and wiring into electric fans. The fans cost about $4 wholesale and eventually will retail in the U.S. for $15 to $40 through such online stores as Amazon.com.

    This is the kind of picture U.S. politicians might conjure up when tapping the hot-button issue of American jobs lost to the flood of Chinese exports. But China's smaller manufacturers themselves face brutal new competition right at home.

    China, one of the world's busiest factory floors, increasingly suffers from a production glut, and the big overseas retailers such as Wal-Mart Stores Inc. that soak up China's exports have been quick to capitalize. They're demanding rock-bottom prices and forcing factory bosses to cut costs any way they can in order to remain in contention for export orders. The average wholesale price for Ching Hai's fans, juicers and toasters has tumbled to $4 from $7 a decade ago, according to company executives.

    It's the survival of the cheapest. At Ching Hai, manager David Liu has cut his labor force in half, to 1,500 workers, even while maintaining the same level of orders. The company's starting salary of about $32 a month is some 40% less than the local minimum wage. Many workers put in 18-hour days with minimal training and constant pressure to boost output. Despite the cost cutting, Mr. Liu says Ching Hai is just barely profitable, although he declines to provide any figures.

    "I had no gray hair before I came," says the 41-year-old Mr. Liu, running a hand over a salt-and-pepper brush cut. "Profits now are too tough."

    The relentless cost cutting raises questions about how much pressure retailers should exert in places where unemployment and weak labor laws are problems. Ching Hai, which has a high rate of accidents mostly involving fingers severed by machinery, has been investigated by the local labor bureau for possible violations. The company defends its safety record and says some accident claims may be bogus.

    The lure of low production costs has been attracting new plants to China from around Asia for the past decade. In recent years, easy credit and expanding know-how in China have caused the number of local manufacturing operations to mushroom. The trade liberalization undertaken since China's entry into the World Trade Organization two years ago drew another raft of foreign manufacturers. Shajing alone, a city of 600,000, boasts about 1,200 factories.

    Buyers are moving aggressively to play one factory against another. "As things get more competitive, the pressure that comes along with that, yeah, we try to take advantage of it," says Gary Meyers, a vice president in global procurement at Wal-Mart.

    Wal-Mart expects to buy $15 billion of goods in China this year, after purchasing about $12 billion last year, or about 8% of all the goods it bought in 2002. Overseas retailers bought a total of $30 billion in goods from China in 2001, according to the most recent government estimates.

    The son of two textile workers in Taiwan, Mr. Liu was the first in his family to break into the ranks of management after he joined Ching Hai's Taiwan headquarters. Then, a decade ago, Ch

  153. dial-up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from walmart.com Note: Linux operating systems may not be compatible with some dial-up Internet services, such as AOL or Wal-Mart Connect. funny, isn'it?

  154. A real innovation would be upgradeability! by WoTG · · Score: 1

    I'd love for someone to create a laptop infrastructure of plug in components. Let's face it, a well used laptop will die because it leads a much tougher life than a desktop - at least they do for me!

    But it's near impossible (or financially infeasible) to replace a dead motherboard or LCD. Most of the pieces are in place. Something like a mini-itx motherboard is about the right size for the bulk of it. Use a standard voltage input. A standard LCD ...er.. envelope. Change the VGA to a DVI interface so that LCD->Vid is not proprietary and voila! A mostly upgradeable laptop.

    Now one of these would get my $$$. That said, I'll probably pony up for a cheap laptop or a used one w/o the aforementioned wishlist in the near future.

  155. Walmart and Microsoft by gillbates · · Score: 1

    Many posters have commented on Walmart's aggressive pricing policies, and the stranglehold that they have on vendor pricing. For example, Walmart routinely "rolls back prices", expecting their suppliers to take the loss. Because they have so many stores, it's hard for a supplier to say no to Walmart. Some have said no to Walmart, only to find Walmart producing it's own brand of their product, and putting them out of business. Walmart has experience taking over industries.

    So now that Walmart is turning its attention to the PC market, how long will it be before Walmart starts carrying Microsoft products? Will Microsoft be able to say no when Walmart wants to do a price rollback? Will we see a "rollback" sign above $49 copies of Office?

    Even though Microsoft has a monopoly on the OS market, they can't afford to shut out a giant like Walmart. And Microsoft knows that if they don't play ball, Walmart will produce their own OS, market it, and put Microsoft out of business. Yes, Microsoft is big, but Walmart:

    • Has experience taking over entire industries,
    • Has a marketing presence worldwide,
    • Has a marketing and advertising budget that Microsoft could only dream of.
    Walmart has $100 billion in annual revenue (compare with Microsoft's $16 billion in assets).

    While I don't like Walmart's monopolization of retail, this is one case in which the free market could very well correct the abuses of Microsoft.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
  156. Re:Somewhat offtopic, but... PCs have gotten CHEAP by pmz · · Score: 1

    I want cheap Xterms connected by ethernet to my FT cluster.

    SunRays are basically this. However, I don't think anyone can expect zero-user downtime (if your spreadsheet is stored in a RAM module that blows, it's just gone, unless their is mirrored RAM or something).

  157. Re:Somewhat offtopic, but... PCs have gotten CHEAP by Usquebaugh · · Score: 1

    Mirrored everything, Stratus do this with their fault tolerant kit and have done since the mid 80s. Zero downtime baby, we can dream, but I want the same reliability I have from my phone. Computers should just work damn it.

  158. Re:Damn, I'm OLD. by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1

    No no no, not notebook.exe (notepad.exe?) -- change it to progman.exe The old Windows3.1 Program Manager is still there and works dandy.

    --

  159. Re:Damn, I'm OLD. by lcde · · Score: 1

    heh yeah notepad... its been awhile. At least i didnt write 'vi' :)

    --
    :%s/teh/the/g
  160. USA is not the world by KingKaneOfNod · · Score: 1

    I can't speak for the rest of the world, but I know we don't have Walmarts here in Australia. Now sad to say guys, while they MIGHT dominate the United States (and Canada, and whereever else they may be) that's still not the whole world. When I see Walmart stores opening in Australia then I will start to get worried. (Although I don't see Coles/Myer or Woolworths letting them get a foot in the door to begin with).