Slashdot Mirror


Pushing P4 to 5.25GHz with Liquid Nitrogen

SkywalkerOS8 writes "The folks at Tom's Hardware have an article up about their attempt to overclock a Pentium 4 over 5 GHz using liquid nitrogen as cooling. A DivX video is available along with pictures of the custom copper cooling head they made."

311 comments

  1. Ads by niko9 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think they should have splashed some nitrogen on some of those flash ads. Gives me a headcahe just looking at the main page.

    Also makes my Thinkpad screech to a crawl.

    1. Re:Ads by theMerovingian · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mozilla: Liquid nitrogen for flash adds

      --
      "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
    2. Re:Ads by saden1 · · Score: 1

      All I have to say is that the pictures are scary. Very disturbing indeed.

      --

      -----
      One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    3. Re:Ads by kevcol · · Score: 1

      Tom's ads always keep the eyeballs busy. I keep waiting for them to have an intro page warning epileptics of what lay inside.

    4. Re:Ads by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      I hope they shut that system down before the frost thawed!

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    5. Re:Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      use the adblock addon for mozilla or firebird, if you aren't using mozilla or firebird then you should be shot!

    6. Re:Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      use Opera and disable plug-ins on-the-fly.

    7. Re:Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shoot anyone whose opinion/preference varies from your own? Sounds like a great plan once you get out of your mother's basement.

    8. Re:Ads by Sk8SuX · · Score: 1

      what ads?

  2. Eschew Obfuscation by anaphora · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Liquid Nitrogen? Compressors? Huge heatsinks? Wouldn't it have been cheaper just to beowulf cluster a few systems together?

    Then again, I guess that wouldn't be as 1337, and we wouldn't have this slashdot story over it.

    1. Re:Eschew Obfuscation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      Liquid Nitrogen? Compressors? Huge heatsinks? Wouldn't it have been cheaper just to beowulf cluster a few systems together?


      I think that's the topic of an upcoming story, be patient.

    2. Re:Eschew Obfuscation by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Liquid Nitrogen? Compressors? Huge heatsinks? Wouldn't it have been cheaper just to beowulf cluster a few systems together?"

      Will Quake run effectively on a beowulf cluster? Will Maya?

      Even if the answer is yes, you've still completely missed the point of the article. It's not a "wee we got 5 ghz of processing going" story, it's a "Ho ho ho more power!" /Tim_Allen_Voice story. Lighten up.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Eschew Obfuscation by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Silly rabbit, NO one worth their weight in Fava beans runs an app like maya on an overclocked machine. Nasty artifacts, much more effecient to span the render of MULTIPLE proccessors

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    4. Re:Eschew Obfuscation by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Nasty artifacts, much more effecient to span the render of MULTIPLE proccessors"

      Yep, you're right. We're talking about benchmarks here, not production tho.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:Eschew Obfuscation by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      If we're talking 'benchmarks' why not just run a stream of NOPs?

      Sometimes it gets to seem very similar to the old trick of changing the jumpers on the little card in your 486's case so it reads 99 on those seven segment digits. Clever, but it's still a 486SX-25 chip.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    6. Re:Eschew Obfuscation by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why do people soup up their Honda Civic with mods instead of buying a better car?

      Why do people buy Acura with leather seats and high-end mods instead of buying a better BMW for the same price?

      Why do people install super cool alarm systems in their cars when you can buy cheaper insurance to cover the same thing?

      If you don't know the answer, you never will ;)

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    7. Re:Eschew Obfuscation by MegaHamsterX · · Score: 1

      I miss those, they seem to have went out of favor fairly quickly.

    8. Re:Eschew Obfuscation by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      moderated as funny, but i think it's sort of disturbing because the parent can be true:

      Why do people soup up their Honda Civic with mods instead of buying a better car?

      oh you mean like with stickers and body effects and stuff? ya, they sure make those cars look fast when they're not. good way to capture a cops attention. capturing a cops attention is the last thing i want.

      Why do people buy Acura with leather seats and high-end mods instead of buying a better BMW for the same price?

      anyone who prefers a Japanese car over a German one is a moron. period. i've owned Japanese cars and I've owned German cars. night and day folks, night and day.

    9. Re:Eschew Obfuscation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1. Why do people buy Acura with leather seats and high-end mods instead of buying a better BMW for the same price?


      anyone who prefers a Japanese car over a German one is a moron. period. i've owned Japanese cars and I've owned German cars. night and day folks, night and day.

      Acura = usa
      BMW = german

      So, what where you talking about again?
    10. Re:Eschew Obfuscation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Acura is Honda, which is Japanese, peabrain.

  3. what they should have used the LN for... by Kewjoe · · Score: 2, Funny

    they should have pored it on good ol' Tom and then put a hammer to him to see if he'd break into little pieces.

    relax im kidding.

    1. Re:what they should have used the LN for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question with Tom isn't would he break into little pieces, but would those little pieces reassemble themselves once thawed.

    2. Re:what they should have used the LN for... by duffhuff · · Score: 3, Funny

      That might work, but I bet he'll just reform again once the shards melt again. The only way to dispose of the Tom-1000 is to drop him into molten lava, preferably at a steel plant in California.

  4. And it still won't run Doom3 by MikeCapone · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh well, I bet it'll get really good time in Seti.

  5. good ole days by fuck_this_shit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    reading things like these I'm reminded of the good old days where all you had to do was getting two 333MHz celerons, overclock them to 500MHz by upping the FSB, some socket-to-slot adaptors and *baddabing* you had a total of 1GHz for a bargain while using normals coolers. Was that only 3 or 4 years ago? *sigh*

    1. Re:good ole days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, nothin' beats 'em good ole days when men where men and women were women. We coded by plugging wires into sockets. Them's were the days. Today, you kids got it easy, and everything costs so much....
      Dammit, now, where is my geritol?

    2. Re:good ole days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A total, numerically, of 1000 GHz. But clock speeds don't add.

      2 X 500 MHz != 1 X 1000 MHz.

    3. Re:good ole days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they square! He had 250000 mhz! that's like a googlehertz. or something.

    4. Re:good ole days by airjrdn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I've got a celeron 566 that's been running at 933 since the beginning of the 1Ghz days.

      They just don't make 'em like they used to. :)

    5. Re:good ole days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liquid nitrogen? Damn, kids today have it too easy.

      In my day you only had liquid spit and you had to make your own, none of this store bought saliva, mind you.

    6. Re:good ole days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or rather, they just don't fail to make them as they could the way they used to.

    7. Re:good ole days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of the good old days, here is an "old" comment by Robert G. Brown denouncing Liquid Nitrogen cooling as dangerous and a waste of time.

      I like the idea of CO2 cooling though...

  6. One wonders how high they can go... by NeoThermic · · Score: 0

    Surley there is a limit here? Plus, doesn't this remind you of that /. article about the person who put four compressor coolers in his computer?

    I wonder what they could OC a Graphics card to if they cooled that down with Liquid Nitrogen... :D

    NeoThermic

    --
    Use my link above, or to view my server, NeoThermic.com
    1. Re:One wonders how high they can go... by Copid · · Score: 1

      There sure is. You're limited by how fast your signal can propagate through the gates and by how much heat your dissipate (power is proportional to clock frequency for any given IC, IIRC). Liquid nitrogen sure helps, but something will give eventually. If nothing else, you can't get around the fact that electrons can only move so fast.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    2. Re:One wonders how high they can go... by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      There sure is. You're limited by how fast your signal can propagate through the gates and by how much heat your dissipate (power is proportional to clock frequency for any given IC, IIRC).

      I think it's proportional to the square of the clock frequency.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  7. In other news... by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny
    P4 to 5.25GHz with Liquid Nitrogen.

    In other news...

    A rose achieved 3.7GHz and a segment of rubber hose was clocked to 7.5GHz. A red rubber ball, however was unable to surpass 300 MHz befor shattering.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:In other news... by Sevn · · Score: 1

      But there was no problem installing netbsd on all three of them.

      --
      For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
    2. Re:In other news... by enigmals1 · · Score: 1

      HA HA! :D

      nice.

  8. 5+ GHz by bmiller949 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The question is, how fast did it play solitaire once Windoze was booted?

    --
    <sig>no sig</sig>
    1. Re:5+ GHz by niko9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The question is, how fast did it play solitaire once Windoze was booted?

      The real question is; how fast did Windows crash before you even loaded solitaire?

    2. Re:5+ GHz by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      That was actually a legitimate question. I haven't read throug the article yet, but this extreme level of overclocking would lead to at least some level of system instability - ie: Linux would crash just as fast. That's the point. What good is 5GHz if it's unusable?

    3. Re:5+ GHz by ameoba · · Score: 2, Funny

      3" + 5GHz = 8"

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    4. Re:5+ GHz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EWWWWW! ROFL! Good one.

    5. Re:5+ GHz by Kneht · · Score: 2, Informative

      The article did state that it was stable at 4700MHz.

      --
      "Are you on some kind of medication?"
      "No"
      "Well, you should be."

      --Bean

    6. Re:5+ GHz by lokedhs · · Score: 1
      What point is 5 GHz if you have to top it up with liquid nitrogen all the time? :-)

      That's gotta be a pain: Almost beating the final boss in quake and the machine crashes because of too little nitrogen!

  9. Holy shit! by Kent+Recal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    And I was shocked when my powerbill for this year arrived...

    1. Re:Holy shit! by hatchetman82 · · Score: 1

      dunno who modded the parent down, but its actually on topic .... all that heat being dissipated by the liquid nitro there is coming out of the power socket ..... hence the huge bill you'd get if you run this things for a couple of weeks (not to mention the transport costs for 20 galons of liquid nitrogen ....)

  10. Nothing better to do? by Shazow · · Score: 1

    Heh, usually when people do something stupid, I usually say they had nothing better to do because they didn't have a computer.

    What's their excuse?! :D

    When did overclocking become a sport? I thought it was just a way to save a few bucks on a processor. Or rather, waste a few bucks if you're unlucky.

    - shazow

    1. Re:Nothing better to do? by JPriest · · Score: 1

      It shows the capibilities of the technology. And it has been a sport for quite some time now.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    2. Re:Nothing better to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was just a way to save a few bucks on a processor.

      They do it because they can. They get enjoyment out of pushing hardware beyond its limits. You need to understand the nerd mentality to grasp the concept.

    3. Re:Nothing better to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, they could spend their time on more productive pursuits, like porting linux to their toasters...

    4. Re:Nothing better to do? by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Overclocking was ALWAYS a sport. Generally, the overclocking add-ons (like fans, water cooling systems, etc) are more expensive than a higher level CPU.

      I don't think anyone really overclocked to improve performance. In any case, the performance improvement from overclocking is negligible for home users.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    5. Re:Nothing better to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's indeed a sport. I and an other quy won the Swedish Champinship in % overclocking last year. Tweeking a Duron 600MHz to 1521MHz (153% over standard) using LN. Not an outstanding result, the cpu was not as good as we wished.
      Useless, and the cpu died at 3v Vcore (aboute 9 times the power). But fun :). /Qaz

    6. Re:Nothing better to do? by spinozaq · · Score: 1

      >I don't think anyone really overclocked to improve
      >performance. In any case, the performance
      >improvement from overclocking is negligible for
      >home users.

      I beg to differ. In some situations, an overclocked machine and extra cooling hardware will cost much, much less then an equally performing "stock" machine. Case in point... lets go back to the year 2000, an Abit BP6 main board and 2 celeron 366 PPGA processors, two Global Win heat sinks and a little thinking would get you up to a dual 550 with 100Mhz front side bus. Note, this happend when the highest clocked chip intel was selling was around the 700Mhz range. I built one of these machines, snagging the chips for a measly 40 bucks a piece. I saved a ton of money, and got one of the best performing workstations of the day.

    7. Re:Nothing better to do? by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Yes there are exceptions. The celeron 366 is probably the BEST EVER for overclocking (someone correct me if I'm wrong--I'm not an overclocker :) ). But in general your accesories cost more.

      Even with your celeron setup, you probably had to upgrade to higher speed memory and the video card too. 100Mhz memory was common and your setup is great. But if you were trying to overclock a 100MHz frontside bus to something higher (this is what people were doing with the Pentium III (my PC is a pentium III) ), you had to make sure that your memory is rated (133Mhz memory was common so no problem there), and your video card would be ok (this is not ok for all cards), as well as other components on the board (like PCI devices and stuff).

      In any case, that's a great setup you had. Only deficiency would be the 2 CPUs which aren't generally used by home users (games don't support multiple CPUs :( ).

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  11. But is it really a good idea? by 77Punker · · Score: 1

    Sounds like it could hurt you and your equipment pretty easily. Better not spring a leak!

    1. Re:But is it really a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't put your equipment in the liquid nitrogen and it won't hurt it, pervert.

    2. Re:But is it really a good idea? by Hoser+McMoose · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course it's not a good idea! Geez, did you look at the pictures? The voltage regulators were covered in ice after a half hour or so. PCs are NOT designed for these sorts of systems, it's unlikely that it would run for a day, let alone any significant amount of time.

      Besides which the cost to buy all that equipment, get a customized motherboard, have someone mill the heatsink and attachments, etc. etc. would surely make this this a ridiculously expensive system.

      However, when it comes right down to it, it sure does get the website a lot of hits, and that was the goal all along.

  12. cost? by cRueLio · · Score: 1

    cool... *drools*
    but.... uhhh... how many people have liquid nitrogen at their house, and what exactly the cost of keeping this baby going?

    i dunno, i just don't see a point in having this much processing power in a home computer, and there are much better (safer, surer) ways of cooling mission-critical computers. I know that at Nasa Ames they use some type of nonconductive liquid and immerse the whole CPU in it, forgot what it was called though...

    just my $.02

    1. Re:cost? by Liquidrage · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The point isn't to have *this* much processing power in a home computer.
      It's more like climbing a mountain. You do it because you can and you enjoy doing it.

    2. Re:cost? by batemanm · · Score: 1
      It's more like climbing a mountain. You do it because you can and you enjoy doing it.

      So the answer to that joke isn't 'to get to the other side'?

    3. Re:cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah ... except that in something like 18 to 24 months, 5GHz will be status quo, and in 3 to 5 years, 5GHz will be "like so yesterday"

      But of course then these guys will be pushing 8GHz and 10GHz.

    4. Re:cost? by Liquidrage · · Score: 1

      You're confusing "climbing a mountain" with "crossing the road" my friend.

    5. Re:cost? by OverclockedMind · · Score: 0

      noone answered the cost bit... :p

      --
      if you can read this, good, because i sure cant
    6. Re:cost? by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's probably something like 3M Fluorinert.

      --
      The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
  13. Direct sampling 2.4GHz? by femto · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would like to see the same thing done with an Analog-to-Digital converter. It would be fun to be able to direct sample a 2.4GHz WLAN signal!

    1. Re:Direct sampling 2.4GHz? by Dolphinzilla · · Score: 1

      Kind of off topic BUT since you brought it up you don't need liquid nitrogen to do that - we were able to use a really nice spectrum analyzer to downconvert (mixer output) the 2.4 GHz RF signal to baseband and then decoded it with a pretty modest A/D converter (11 Mb/s aint that fast). But even that was overkill we just wanted to be able to see the bits flipping :-)

    2. Re:Direct sampling 2.4GHz? by femto · · Score: 1

      My point exactly! Rather than using a 'really nice spectrum analyser', it would be fun to use a relatively cheap ADC with no mixer. Sure, for practical uses dynamic range will be a problem (or analog bandpass filtering will be required), but it would still be a fun thing to do.

    3. Re:Direct sampling 2.4GHz? by Dolphinzilla · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here is an ADC (dual actually) and an FPGA to do the decoding for you :-) you still need to mix down the 2.4 GHz but that is pretty easy and inexpensive - this one is fast enough that if you were nuts enough you could create your own software radio with it (its a nice card with good VHDL support)
      Benadda dual AD DA card
      And I agree with you it is a cool idea !

  14. Warts too? by kevcol · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have an Athlon that seems to be growing warts. Will this take care of that as well?

    1. Re:Warts too? by ergo98 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Totally offtopic, but as a note of interest: When I was a young lad, around 14, I had several nasty warts on my hand. You see I'd previously gotten the nitrogen treatment on them, but one survived and my fear of the nitrogen (even though it didn't "hurt", per se, there still is a survival instinct to avoid having your flesh frozen) kept me away from further treatment.

      Anyways, and to get to the point of the story, I then had a summer job "priming tobacco" (I lived in an agricultural area) -- within a week of priming tobacco my hands were completely clear. The conclusion is that either it was an amazing coincidence, physical work with your hands eliminates warts, or the most likely is that tobacco plant juices eliminate warts.

      This is the first I've told anyone publicly about this amazing discovery, so I urge you to rush to isolate the tobacco constituents responsible for the anti-wart behaviour.

      As a sidenote - the most memorable part of priming was when I reached into a plant and gripped around the plant to feel the goo of a huge tobacco caterpillar bursting in your grip.

    2. Re:Warts too? by happypizzaguy · · Score: 1

      No, silly, everyone knows that only duct tape can remove warts.

      --
      "When all else fails, there's always delusion." -Conan O'Brien
    3. Re:Warts too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Painting the house did it for me... dunno if it was the paint or the paint thinner.

    4. Re:Warts too? by Cheval · · Score: 1

      no. for that you take some salted ham and put it on the CPU and then you bury the ham.

    5. Re:Warts too? by Hoser+McMoose · · Score: 1

      Chances are that the "tobacco juices" you were coming into contact with were actually pesticides that were sprayed on the plants. Tobacco has traditionally been one of the crops most heavily sprayed with pesticides, herbicides and the like. Some fairly heavy duty stuff that probably could kill off warts and cause cancer at the same time!

    6. Re:Warts too? by WhoCouldItBe · · Score: 1

      A similar thing happened to me, though it wasn't a tobacco plant.

      I was changing my car's fuel filter. The fuel line was REALLY stuck on it, and when I finally got the hose popped off, a little bit of gasoline dripped got onto the wart on my thumb.

      The wart turned a blackish-gray color at first, and then a few days later, it was gone!

    7. Re:Warts too? by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Yuck.. did you have to add the sidenote? :)

      Based on the other messages here, it seems that the chemicals from some other contaminant was the cause of it...or it could be tobacco too but seems unlikely given other people's responses.

      To test your hypothesis, perhaps someone can buy a bunch of cigarettes (unless you can get tobacco leaves) and burn them and stick your hand into the smoke (not the fire) and see if it does anything (or preferably mash them into some liquid and then soak in on your hand). If someone has warts and wants a traditional alternative this might be it.... DISCLAIMER: I am not responsible for any damage to yourself. Only recommended for adults.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    8. Re:Warts too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by the time someone starts physically handling tobacco, they aren't going to be spraying any of that crap on the crops. It's been known for quite a long time that tobacco contains natural toxins that can be used for purposes like this. sheesh...people bitch and complain about 'scientific illiteracy', but 'ag illiteracy' is just as bad, but fueled by the lies of PETA and other urban special interest groups.

    9. Re:Warts too? by MegaHamsterX · · Score: 1

      The concentrated nicotine would take care of your warts.....and you. They do use the stuff for pesticide......stick to the nitrogen....

      On the topic of the story, yep it's kind of extreme to pull the nitrogen out to get clock speed, and the major problem I see is the condensate, has anyone attempted to do this with the motherboard in a case at a vacuum and the heatsink exposed through the top of the case. I'm sure something would need to be fashioned from some copper connected to the heat sink to cool any ICs that rely on airflow, but it would be neat to push everything all at once just to see how fast everything could be overclocked.

    10. Re:Warts too? by kevcol · · Score: 1

      Pity this was posted after the mods ran over it- I think this is funnier than my post that was modded as such :-)

  15. Custom what? by Wireless+Joe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Custom copper cooling head? That's a bong if I've ever seen one.

    1. Re:Custom what? by jred · · Score: 1

      Damn you! Now I have to rtfa to see it :(

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    2. Re:Custom what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm also not quite sure what 'special manufacturing processes' were needed. it looks like a shop class project.

    3. Re:Custom what? by lokedhs · · Score: 1
      Welding copper is hard, apparently.

      Also, I don't think there is any need for it to look all polished. :-)

    4. Re:Custom what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They polished the bottom to ensure it makes perfect contact with the CPU's heat spreader plate.

      Although in the photo the "finished" surface looks far from well sanded... You shouldn't make it perfectly smooth (because very small irregularities on both surfaces attach to each other on contact and actually improve the connection and heat transfer) but you should make it prefectly clean and even.

      Also, it's dumb to use just silicon paste in a record attempt where every MHz counts. Thye should have used aluminun (or silver) paste.

      Also, they shoyld have used a silver plate om the bottom of the heatsink (like in NoiseControl's Silverado CPU heatsink). Now they went the easy way and cannibalized a copper heatsink instead of having their own made.

      Actually, THG's attempt was so amateurish that I'm surprised they got to beyond 5 GHz. Must have been a really well cherry-picked P4, and some very good motherboard modding work by somebody else (Asus techies??)... All the THG guys did was attach the heatsink on the standard clips and pour LN2 outta the thermos. And place the ads on the story, of course.

    5. Re:Custom what? by lokedhs · · Score: 1

      Well, on the other hand it doesn't seem that they were having any heat problems at all. It would seem that the system failed at higher clock speeds for other reasons than overheating.

  16. /. discovers THG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like Slashdot has discovered Tom's Hardware Guide today.

    Nice to see my two favorite sites (besides Google) linking to each other :)

  17. Why do geeks try to increase CPU speeds? by Gyan · · Score: 1

    Because it's not there.

  18. Because its there......I guess by BWJones · · Score: 1

    The experiment to see if it can be done is always fun, but I wonder what practicality can come out of this? It's expensive as can be and equipment lifetime costs are high due to frequent failures. I've done some overclocking in my time, but it has always been sort of a hobby thing to see if I could do it. Several years ago I was impressed when I actually got to visit a couple of Cray clusters we had been submitting work to. They had little windows on the ends where you could see liquid (fluorocarbons) flowing over the components to keep things cool, but this was a multi-million dollar facility doing classified work.

    I guess I am wondering if there are there any users seriously pushing the limits of commodity hardware by overclocking to extremes?

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Because its there......I guess by BWJones · · Score: 1

      I guess I am wondering if there are there any users seriously pushing the limits of commodity hardware by overclocking to extremes?

      I should have said "I guess I am wondering if there are there any users doing serious work on commodity hardware that has been overclocked to extremes?"

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    2. Re:Because its there......I guess by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      The experiment to see if it can be done is always fun, but I wonder what practicality can come out of this?

      One of the useful things to come out of this is an idea of what a given chip design is capable of. If you look at the speeds liquid nitrogen cooling reaches at the beginning of a design's life cycle, that's the speed the chip will be selling at at the end of the life cycle.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  19. Re:And then you'll do what with it? by dreadlocks · · Score: 3, Funny

    They must have received an early beta of the new MS OS. They need more horsepower.

  20. Dual Xeon, Quad Opteron, Much Better Sense by meehawl · · Score: 1

    Dualies or Quaddies would be a much better approach than this kind of nonsense. Why have a single (admittedly fast) CPU bottleneck?

    Racing for higher MHz is a mug's game - that's why Intel, IBM, Sony, AMD, etc are moving to multi-core chips.

    --

    Da Blog
    1. Re:Dual Xeon, Quad Opteron, Much Better Sense by Indy1 · · Score: 1

      several problems with your approach.

      First: a lot of programs either dont make use of smp or use it very poorly for any number of reasons

      Second: the P4 (and its derivatives) make for a shoddy smp platform because they all share the same memory bus. Amd's dedicated memory bus per processor (with the opteron) gives far better smp performance, and benchmarks of the xeon vs opteron confirm this.

      --
      Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
    2. Re:Dual Xeon, Quad Opteron, Much Better Sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gaming doesn't gain a lick of advantage on "dualies" and "quaddies"

    3. Re:Dual Xeon, Quad Opteron, Much Better Sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you'd want two or four LN2-cooled very fast CPUs!

      But my motherboard only has one socket, you insensitive clod.

      ***

      And you forgot Motorola among the manufacturers. They are moving to multi-core chips sometime in 2204 or so.

    4. Re:Dual Xeon, Quad Opteron, Much Better Sense by davidstrauss · · Score: 1
      Racing for higher MHz is a mug's game - that's why Intel, IBM, Sony, AMD, etc are moving to multi-core chips.

      It's not simply for performance reasons. The marketing value of higher GHz is just too great to switch away from it without a good reason. The reason is quantum effects and instability beyond around 3.2GHz or so. The P4 "Extreme Edition" is an example of Intel compensating for its inability to continue to clock the GHz up.

  21. DON'T DROP IT!!!! by downix · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can imagine it now, one careless motion and SMASH your CPU is in itty bitty pieces.

    --
    Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
    1. Re:DON'T DROP IT!!!! by dicepackage · · Score: 1

      I would be more worried if someone dropped the equipment that cools the CPU.

  22. I wonder if this would be cost effective by t0qer · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this would be cheaper for short render work than purchasing a faster CPU.

    It would be neat if they had blade servers that had a liquid nitrogen tanks. When a work order is recieved, a truck comes in and fills a liquid nitrogen storage tank. Then it's fed into the blade cabinet. Once all the cpu's in the blade are at running overclock tempature turn the whole thing on.

  23. Like trying to overclock a VW by xC0000005 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is a amusing article, but kind of misses the point. So one problem with running processors faster is that they get too hot and we can get around that by cooling it with liquid nitrogen. Cool, but CPU heat is just one design element contributing to the effective speed of the computer.

    This is like saying that I should cool my VW with liquid nitrogen so that I can run the engine faster. Sure, I'll pick up some speed, but honestly there are lots of other factors preventing my VW from running at a more productive speed than how fast I can get the engine spinning. The shape (like the bus on a PC), the steering (peripherals), and mostly that the cops don't appreciate me going 328mph through the school zone.

    --
    www.voiceofthehive.com - Beekeeping and Honeybees for those who don't.
    1. Re:Like trying to overclock a VW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wouldn't gain a damned thing if you LN2 cooled your VW engine. Don't believe me? Try it yourself and then post pictures.

      Why oh why are so many geeks so friggin mechanically DUMB?

    2. Re:Like trying to overclock a VW by digital+bath · · Score: 1

      yes, you would. Ever heard of an intercooler?

      Cooler air is more dense. More dense == more air per cubic inch. More air == more fuel == more power.

      --
      find / -name "*.sig" | xargs rm
    3. Re:Like trying to overclock a VW by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 1

      You were missing 2 words, Propagation Delay. It takes time for gates to switch, it is independant of clock speed, and for all of the individual delays to work itself down the circuit.

      --

      ----
      Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    4. Re:Like trying to overclock a VW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cooling air != cooling engine

    5. Re:Like trying to overclock a VW by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why oh why are so many geeks so friggin mechanically DUMB?

      This is a pretty interesting question. I would wager that the geeks of old, having no computers invested their time learning about machines. But with no internet to speak of, how could they amass their collections of pornography ? I've heard that in the old days, pornography was distributed in something similar to a cheap book. You could appearently buy it at a place called "the corner store". I searched google for hours, but I couldn't find anymore information. I would assume that the store is located on some sort of corner, but the corner of what - I wonder.

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    6. Re:Like trying to overclock a VW by __aawwih8715 · · Score: 1


      Um, not in an internal combustion engine. Won't gain a thing. Maybe a few hp because the air will heat up less on the way through the intake manifold and through the cylinder heads, but thats it.

      An internal combustion engine is like an air pump.

      Get more air in make more power.

      I really doesn't matter on cycles per second. There is a point where more cycles per second makes less power because the air velocity isn't high enough to fill the cylinders.

    7. Re:Like trying to overclock a VW by Xabraxas · · Score: 1
      Correct!

      But he didn't say that. He said:

      I should cool my VW with liquid nitrogen so that I can run the engine faster

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    8. Re:Like trying to overclock a VW by Xabraxas · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's only because an engine is relatively cool. If you introduce forced induction the engine gets much hotter and a cooler intake will produce quite a few ponies.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    9. Re:Like trying to overclock a VW by yourmom16 · · Score: 1

      electric fields propagate at the speed of light, so thats not a problem

      --
      "We have got to make Stan understand the importance of voting, because he'll definitely vote for our guy." - South Park
    10. Re:Like trying to overclock a VW by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Informative

      He said: I should cool my VW with liquid nitrogen so that I can run the engine faster

      Heh, that's easy - use an air/water Ic and stick ice in the reservoir.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    11. Re:Like trying to overclock a VW by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 1

      First of all, the clock is a signal that never goes through any logic gates (or never should) untill it hits the clock input on a ff. Even then, clocks need to be distributed in such a way that it arrives at all clock inputs at the same time! Normally there is a bit of clock skew. IN prescott they had to route it by hand it is so critical. Secondly propagation delay is the time between the valid input and output of a circuit. Don't forget these things can't switch instaneously. Usually it is in the order or nano or pico seconds depending on the fabrication process. This usually determines the clock speed as much as anything else. This is the whole purpose for having a clock in the first place! It neeeds to keep all the information synchronized. The clock is never faster than the slowest circuit!

      --

      ----
      Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    12. Re:Like trying to overclock a VW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      and mostly that the cops don't appreciate me going 328mph through the school zone.

      Yeah, but let's see them try to stop you.

    13. Re:Like trying to overclock a VW by __aawwih8715 · · Score: 1

      True but only a few relative to cooling the charge air temperature (in a forced induction engine). I was of course assuming the engine was NA and cooling the intake does little, and supercooling wouldn't help much.

      I have seen some strap their cars to the chassis dyno and during the run spray the intercooler with nitrogen and make dramatically higher horsepower, but its terribly impracticle and was just a stress test and a 'how much can it make'. Pretty cool though. I'll see if i can't find the link.

      http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread.php?s= 1c 6a16ad2cdd45f7f717f63701a0eb88&threadid=130463&hig hlight=dyno+spray

    14. Re:Like trying to overclock a VW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is most likely the dumbest analogy ever posted on Slashdot.

  24. If you think liquid nitrogen is cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...a liquid oxygen cooler is smoking!

  25. Do they really need liquid nitrogen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems like liquid nitrogen is overkill. If the processor was running at -190 Celcius, it means that there was a lot of room for the processor to go. If the processor's normal operating range was something like 40 Celcius, then couldn't they have used something else less drastic, that would cool the processor down to just around 40? It seems like they didn't need to get the processor down to -190 or was nitrogen used just for the theatrical value?

    1. Re:Do they really need liquid nitrogen? by Spam.B.gone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      although -190 Celcius is indeed somewhat on the chilly side, I think N2 would be a sound choise: You need something with a boiling point somewhere below 0 celcius (so you have a nice temperature gradient to work with) and you don't want to worry about the environment too much when your liquid boils away. N2 fits, it is easily available and has the bonus benefit that it will nicely extinguish the small fires where the graphics card is trying to keep up with the CPU

  26. Not as new as you may think by xhabbo · · Score: 1

    This has been done before though along other lines: http://www.muropaketti.com/artikkelit/cooling/r300 _ln2/

  27. imagine... by Raagshinnah · · Score: 1

    imagine a beowulf cluster of those...

    (sorry i just had to)

    1. Re:imagine... by mlk · · Score: 1

      Parts of the m/b would die. Hopefully with a bang.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  28. Cool, no oun intended by MajorDick · · Score: 0

    This is cool, the old CRAY used to use something like this but I think it was freon , What I want to know is what would happen if you cooled the ENTIRE MB ? Memory and all ? Could you pull 10+ gHz ?

  29. First post! by -kertrats- · · Score: 2, Funny

    FP!
    hmm, maybe i should get one of these. My processor is kinda slow...

    --
    The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
  30. lawsuits are to come... by MattFromOpp · · Score: 1

    some fool will try to rig this at home, as clumbsy as we all are, not to mention how painful it is to work inside a system, and will end up spilling liquid nitro and breaking a couple of fingers into pretty little frozen shards...I won't touch this one with a ten foot stick.

    1. Re:lawsuits are to come... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LN2 isn't a very good heat conductor. You'll have to keep your fingers in it for a while before you get that sort of effects.

  31. Abuse of Industrial Gases by pipingguy · · Score: 3, Informative


    I'm not sure, but a better use of industrial gases might be this and probably would provide more perceived results.

    (speaking as an ex LOX, LH2 and LN2 piping designer, of course, YMMV)

  32. Hardware damage! by starsong · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Heh, this looks like a lot of fun, but that board's not going to last long. Look at the picture on the first page. See the capacitors next to the socket with little ice crystals growing on them? Those are electrolytic caps; they use a liquid electrolyte which doesn't take kindly to being frozen solid. I'm amazed they didn't split open. Colder isn't always better; some components will simply fail at liquid-N2 temperatures. At least they took steps to deal with condensation.

    1. Re:Hardware damage! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU MEAN WE SHOULDNT USE N2 TO COOL BUSINESS CRITIAL HARDWARE???

      Get out. Moron.

  33. It's all giggles until someone loses consciousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Wild" Bill Zollar, my Chem 140 professor told us the story about how ever couple or four years he'd do a liquid nitrogen demonstration. The common freeze it break it variety, which he personally didn't find exciting enough to suit his tastes. So he'd don two latex gloves having filled up the thumb of one with ground beef. He would then dunk the thumb of ground round into the liquid nitrogen while he was talking and then take it out and hit it with a hammer. Appearently, the last year he did it, a chuck of his flash frozen fake finger hit a girl in the head, causing her to pass out! Which in turn got HIM sent to the dean's office, and why he couldn't do it for us, and hasn't done it since.

    Or so the story went (as I recall).

  34. A+ on the safety Tom by inkpassion · · Score: 0

    I love how all they are wearing in those pictures are goggles. And are they performing this "record breaking" over clock on the walkway in an apartment complex? Toms crew though of everything to get it to 5ghz but very little on safety.

  35. Overkill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like they're half way to an X-Prize.

  36. Sadly... by Digitus1337 · · Score: 1

    ...even something that powerful cannot withstand the almighty slashdotting forever

  37. If the screw it up badly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they suffocate. Natural selection, I really don't foresee a problem.

  38. Looks like something any ordinary plumber could do by glenebob · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With all that fancy talk about tolerances and only one company in the world that could make the aparatus, you'd think it would be bit fancier... Nope, just a coper plate with a copper tube sticking up off of it that you fill with nitrogen, and it cools via evaperation. I could build it with some 2-inch copper pipe, a torch, and some soldier... 5 GHz is cool and all, but come on, is there really the need to make it sound so difficult?

  39. Why not use superconductors & Josephson juncti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they're going to push the limit and using liquid nitrogen anyway, might as well do something potentially useful.

  40. Thats nothing! by geekoid · · Score: 1

    I got my Athalon 1.4G to behave like it was cooled to absolute zero!

    Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk!

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Thats nothing! by OverclockedMind · · Score: 0

      if you cooled it to absolute zero, it simply wouldnt work you know, as all molecular action stops at this temp. [yeah yeah i know, he said "like," but i just HAD to]

      --
      if you can read this, good, because i sure cant
  41. Tom's hardware is like Star Trek by LynXmaN · · Score: 1

    Going bodly where no blue screen have ever arrived before (so fast)

    --
    May the source be with you!
    1. Re:Tom's hardware is like Star Trek by double-oh+three · · Score: 0

      You mean boldly going where no red screen has gone before. It's just going fast enough to appear blue to you.

      --
      "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
  42. Shorts by king-manic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    with that amount of ice crystals, I'm surprised it didn't short? I know it's distilled water but you figure minerals from the metallic elements on the silicon would contaiminate it and cause shorts?

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    1. Re:Shorts by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Solid ice is an insulator, because it does not have moving ions. However, in liquid form, even distilled water does conduct some current because of the autoprotolysis of water molecules.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  43. I've done better than that! by NeoThermic · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Yes, I got 6.58Ghz out of my 1.2Ghz Intel Celeron. Image1

    Its a true screenshot. What isn't true is the actual clock... I ran some ASM that had a typo in it, and it somehow accelerated the windows timer, thus making apps see my CPU as something faster.

    Even more amazing is what 3D mark 03 sees. Yes, to that program, I have a 60.1Ghz processor (not a typo)

    Image 2

    And I didn't even have to use any more cooling than the laptops normal fan.

    Any Questions? ;)

    NeoThermic

    --
    Use my link above, or to view my server, NeoThermic.com
    1. Re:I've done better than that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to get a better webhost.

    2. Re:I've done better than that! by NeoThermic · · Score: 1

      >> Time to get a better webhost.

      Eh, they are only there because I took them last year when I used my account to archive images and other documents. I'm now self hosting on a server in my room.

      NeoThermic

      --
      Use my link above, or to view my server, NeoThermic.com
    3. Re:I've done better than that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any Questions? ;)

      Yeah, could you move your site out of geocities before posting its links on friggin slashdot?

    4. Re:I've done better than that! by herrvinny · · Score: 1

      Geocities? You put it on Geocities? Of course that site is going to get /.ed in a hurry, what with the stupid Geocities limits on how much transfer you get. I stopped using Geocities right after Yahoo bought it, they really screwed over a once decent service...

    5. Re:I've done better than that! by NeoThermic · · Score: 1

      Yay! we slashdotted my account!

      I'm just finding my local copy of the images then I will paste the links to them from my own webserver.

      Then you can have a go at slashdotting my bandwidth :)

      NeoThermic

      --
      Use my link above, or to view my server, NeoThermic.com
    6. Re:I've done better than that! by NeoThermic · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Yes, now we are probibaly going to slashdot me, but wtf, I'm going to bed, so it shouldn't affect me much.

      Here are the Images again:

      6.58Ghz

      60.1Ghz

      NeoThermic

      --
      Use my link above, or to view my server, NeoThermic.com
    7. Re:I've done better than that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably also made it profitable. Face it, giving away stuff for free is not a good business model. When the admarket collapsed in y2k business models like geocities' became impossible to maintain.

    8. Re:I've done better than that! by Mys*lf · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean slow down the windows timer?

      You would then have more CPU clocks by fake -very long- second

    9. Re:I've done better than that! by NeoThermic · · Score: 1

      >>You would then have more CPU clocks by fake -very long- second

      I actualy never put 100% thought into it. Saying it like that actualy makes sense... as more operations can be completed in a longer second than an exact one... heh, thanks for spotting that.

      NeoThermic

      --
      Use my link above, or to view my server, NeoThermic.com
  44. Mod me up: Tom sucks post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Toms Hardware sucks ass! (+1 Interesting)

    His articles are too long! (+1 Insightful)

    Whos the dumbass editor who put up 2 Toms hardware articles on slashdot in one day. I thought slashdot didn't duvk. (-1 Troll, +1 Funny because toms hardware sucks)

    Tom is a advertisment whoring whore (+1 Insightful)

    Tom is a corporate shill (+1 underatted)

    AC(0 points) = 0 +1 +1 -1 +1 +1 +1 = +4

  45. Overclocking is stupid--No, make that "insane" by shanen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This overclocking stuff is REALLY stupid to the point of insanity. My conclusion is that it's a weird fantasy about the lone DIY (do-it-yourself) tinkerer.

    First, consider the economic side. For all of the special efforts and costs needed to cool down, test, and monitor an overclocked CPU, you could just buy a couple more for the same speedup effect. No special anything required. At the same time, there is no real need for all those cycles--we have a glut of cycles now. If it were really cost-effective to overclock and use special cooling systems, then the very few people who actually do need lots and lots of cycles would be using overclocking for their supercomputers--and they don't. They just buy more CPUs and run them the way they were designed.

    The design question leads to the second point. Building a modern CPU is not a hobby for amateurs. It is an incredibly complicated device involving the efforts of large teams of very clever people using very fancy design tools. No one person could even know all the details of a modern CPU. Far too many details. They may know some of the higher level features, or know a lot of detail about a tiny section, but no one really understands all of it. However, they are doing the best they can to insure that it will work reliably, and that includes MANY design considerations that are related to the clock speed.

    So back to my main conclusion: Overclocking is a fantasy of the DIY tinkerer "beating" the experts. Actually, it's nice when it happens, but overclocking is NOT one of those cases. The overclockers fantacize about some form of "delivering more bang for the buck", but they are competing directly against professionals with the same goal. The pros win, especially in Intel's case where their development costs per CPU are almost negligible. As the joke goes, "The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, but that's the way to bet." The overclockers already lost. (By the way, I think this is also an expecially American fantasy, a kind of "independence" thing, and that there are very few non-American overclockers.)

    One more technical aspect as a fairly concrete example. Overclocked computers can become unreliable. Many overclockers limit their testing to "Does it boot and seem to run the OS properly?" However, the OS is not using the floating point resources the same way that true numeric applications do. The machine may seem okay as far as the OS is concerned, but actually be producing gibberish results. (There was actually a probable example of this published by seti@home. I'm tempted to diverge into the psychological relationships there...)

    Ergo, I've never heard of Intel hiring someone for their expertise in overclocking, and I don't expect to.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    1. Re:Overclocking is stupid--No, make that "insane" by shanen · · Score: 1

      Forgot one important bit of evidence from personal experience... Many years ago I worked at AMD for a while. At that time, the 286 was the standard but boring moneymaker, and one of the guys I worked with was one of the main people on the 286. He was PLENTY clever and knew a LOT about making the CPU run fast. Actually, AMD's 286 clones were already running much faster than Intel had thought possible for the design.

      However, he wasn't the most clever guy there. Those guys were all working on the 386 project. I think he knew most of them, though I never met them.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    2. Re:Overclocking is stupid--No, make that "insane" by Pidder · · Score: 1

      [i]First, consider the economic side. For all of the special efforts and costs needed to cool down, test, and monitor an overclocked CPU, you could just buy a couple more for the same speedup effect.[/i] No you cannot buy another CPU for the same speedup effect. A system of two slower CPUs is not equal to a system of one fast. [i]The design question leads to the second point. Building a modern CPU is not a hobby for amateurs. It is an incredibly complicated device involving the efforts of large teams of very clever people using very fancy design tools. No one person could even know all the details of a modern CPU. Far too many details. They may know some of the higher level features, or know a lot of detail about a tiny section, but no one really understands all of it. However, they are doing the best they can to insure that it will work reliably, and that includes MANY design considerations that are related to the clock speed. [/i] So in what way is that related to this test? Sure, I don't know anything about the architecture of my AMD XP 2500+ but that doesn't stop me from running it perfectly stable at the same speed as 3200+. A chip that cost $400 when I bought my 2500+ for $100. I bought a $400 dollar product for $100. There is no other way of seeing it. It's not stupid or insane. [i]So back to my main conclusion: Overclocking is a fantasy of the DIY tinkerer "beating" the experts. Actually, it's nice when it happens, but overclocking is NOT one of those cases. The overclockers fantacize about some form of "delivering more bang for the buck", but they are competing directly against professionals with the same goal. The pros win, especially in Intel's case where their development costs per CPU are almost negligible.[/i] I'll make this very easy for you: Buy 2.4 ghz CPU. Run it at 3.0 ghz with stock cooling. Buy 3.0 ghz CPU for more money. Which one delivers most "bang for the buck". Certainly not the overpriced 3.0 ghz CPU. As you yourself said: The production cost per CPU is very low... and yet they sell the fastest chips at such a high price compared to the middle segment. Since when is Intel's goal to deliver the "most bang for the buck". Last time I checked intel's goal was to earn money.

    3. Re:Overclocking is stupid--No, make that "insane" by Pidder · · Score: 1

      Yes the post looks like crap. I'm not used to having to use html tags instead of [ ].

    4. Re:Overclocking is stupid--No, make that "insane" by rcpitt · · Score: 1
      Back in the days before they'd invented zero there was a new technology called the automobile. In the beginning it was used only by the rich and crazy but as time wore on the things these idiots invented found their way into commodity products that you, me or the guys working for Mr. Ford over there could purchase and enjoy - despite the fact that most of us couldn't design a car engine let alone the rest of the car's bits and pieces.

      Today I get to enjoy a day at the Vancouver Molson Indy watching some of the second fastest (fastest are F1) race cars in the world as their teams vie for kudos in the form of winnings.

      Companies like Ford, Honda etc. use these tests to perfect new ways of making things go faster and if you think the stuff they do doesn't get into production products you're wrong - my GoldWing has an engine in it that uses many of the same techniques and design elements that Honda's Indy/CART engines have.

      So... you never know what might end up being used out of all of the various techniques and technologies these guys had to invent. You only see the CPU - I see the power supply mods, the heat sink mods and many other things.

      --
      Been there, done that, paid for the T-shirt
      and didn't get it
    5. Re:Overclocking is stupid--No, make that "insane" by OverclockedMind · · Score: 0

      Dont forget, you still have one helluvalotta current (to you it doesnt seem like much, but to the chip...) going through those tiny little paths, they are gonna degrade faster nomatter HOW cold you get them

      --
      if you can read this, good, because i sure cant
    6. Re:Overclocking is stupid--No, make that "insane" by Goonie · · Score: 1
      First, consider the economic side. For all of the special efforts and costs needed to cool down, test, and monitor an overclocked CPU, you could just buy a couple more for the same speedup effect.

      Whilst I also think these overclocking games are mostly a waste of time, I just have to take issue with this claim. Some problems are easy to split up, so you can run them in parallel. Some are considerably harder, and require fancy low latency interconnection designs. Some are inherently impossible to speed up through parallelization.

      --

      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
      --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    7. Re:Overclocking is stupid--No, make that "insane" by bogie · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Overclocking is a fantasy of the DIY tinkerer "beating" the experts"

      Whoah, time to lay off the meds. What do you care if someone wants to get all they can out of a product they bought?

      Your post is a fine foil to dissuade someone from spending $500-$100 on OC'ing equipment. It fails miserably to describe why its bad for the average $25 heatsink buying OC'er. Hell the average Intel overclocker usually just uses the stock HSF. Do you really think you have a case when its so easy to take for example a P4 1.8 and overclock it to 2.4 with no extra money and no ill effects?

      Your right overclocked computer can be unreliable, but that's why benchmark programs exist. If you can save $50-$75 by buying the lower end model and speeding it up what's wrong with that? I also don't really think your entitled to make the call whether someone has enough computing power as well. Am I allowed to tell you that you only need a '83 Yugo because YOU don't need anything more than 80hp?

      These posts against overclocking never hold up and I don't know why you thought yours would.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    8. Re:Overclocking is stupid--No, make that "insane" by iamplupp · · Score: 1

      "By the way, I think this is also an expecially American fantasy, a kind of "independence" thing, and that there are very few non-American overclockers."


      hmm.. then how come this site has over 30000 registered members and about 1500 individual members logging on every day? and that is in a country with less than half the population of new york...

    9. Re:Overclocking is stupid--No, make that "insane" by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      Mmm... I'm not really sure where I stand on this issue. I tend to agree that it borders on the "insane" - but so do most "extreme sports" and loads of other things people do for entertainment, and the sake of record-breaking.

      From the sake of the engineering challenge itself, it seems like a good exercise. If you read the whole article, you'd see where they had a very difficult time getting someone to construct the copper tube with the exact specifications needed. In the end, only one guy (a German coppersmith who does everything pretty much by hand) could provide what they needed. Then they had to take the time to calculate the additional power draw needed and modified the motherboard appropriately.

      Practically speaking though, no - it's not too useful to have to have someone sitting there pouring liquid nitrogen down the tube while you use the computer. :)

    10. Re:Overclocking is stupid--No, make that "insane" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ergo, You're a conceded, egotistical, pompus asshole who thinks his opinion matters more than others. And, just like so many others like you, YOU'RE COMPLETLY AND UTTERLY WRONG.

      People overclock for the same reason ppl tweak cars. Cuz its their property and they like to tweak. Maybe you should run a Beowulf cluster to predict weather, but you only need to overclock your current rig to get an extra 10 FPS in your favorite game.

      Overclocking is not exclusive to America. Just as many Brits, Aussies, Canucks, Japanese, Germans, Norwiegans, Mexicans, etc etc overclock. The article in question is from Tom's hardware, Tom's not American. (Funny how you like to associate something you dont like with America, but thats an entirly different discussion).

      No one person could even know all the details of a modern CPU
      Don't you mean *YOU* don't know all the details of a modern cpu? Intel, in the past, has neutered cpus. That is, they designed a cpu core to run at a rated speed and sold that design at intentally lower speeds to fill market demand. ITS CALLED UNDERCLOCKING. I still have a celeron 300A that has ran flawlessly at 450 since I purchased it (5 years now). There is room for overclocking, its not insane, and frankly no one cares if you approve of it or not.

    11. Re:Overclocking is stupid--No, make that "insane" by FatherOfONe · · Score: 1

      I agree with your post, but being a race car fan you are watching the 3rd fastest. Most top fuel cars run 310+. Granted a F1 or Cart car could probably run that fast, but they don't currently.

      Again I agree with the point of your post, now if Honda would just make the Goldwing lighter than an Accord :-)

      I own a Ducati :-)

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
    12. Re:Overclocking is stupid--No, make that "insane" by rcpitt · · Score: 1
      OK - I should have qualified that and said "that can turn a corner" :)

      the new Honda 1800(have not yet ridden one) is 120+lbs lighter than the one I ride (1998 GL1500) and sports a solid Aluminum machined frame instead of the tubular steel one I have - another one of them thar new-fangled inventions of the speed freaks ;)

      Funny cars are just that -

      --
      Been there, done that, paid for the T-shirt
      and didn't get it
    13. Re:Overclocking is stupid--No, make that "insane" by jred · · Score: 1

      An '83 Yugo would be cool. I have a 425 V8 I could use to overclock it :)

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    14. Re:Overclocking is stupid--No, make that "insane" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with your post, but being a race car fan you are watching the 3rd fastest. Most top fuel cars run 310+. Granted a F1 or Cart car could probably run that fast, but they don't currently.

      From this post it is evident that you are NOT in fact a race car fan at all.

      You are a mindless big-engine moron.

      Have fun!

    15. Re:Overclocking is stupid--No, make that "insane" by IM6100 · · Score: 1
      I don't mind people doing whatever they want with their own hardware. What does piss me off about the overclocking culture is what it's done to the clone hardware market.

      Many hardware vendors won't issue any warranty at all for processors anymore, because overclockers stress their parts well beyond what the manufacturer designed them for, and traditionally bring them back to return if they 'fail' the test and burn up.

      The market, i.e. eBay, is flooded with screwed up processors that some overclocker has burned out.

      Hardware vendors test their product, and verify that they'll work to the specifications they cite. Exceeding said specifications might work, it might now. But it by definition means a less reliable system. As long as people understand that (and I don't know of anybody who doesn't) it's fine.

      But the numbered points above demonstrate why overclockers annoy some of us.

      I overclocked my 12 MHz 286 motherboard (actually, just the ISA buss- I had set the ISA bus clock multiplier wrong and the AT bus was running at 12 MHz.) It made Wolfenstein 3D run faster, but it also made some of the cards I plugged into the motherboard not work. I corrected my error when I figured out what I had done. I consider it as having been a stupid mistake. I didn't think I was 'socking it to the man' by doing what I did. Even though it made Wolfenstein 3D slightly more fun to play.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    16. Re:Overclocking is stupid--No, make that "insane" by dr.badass · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did an overclocker kill your parents or something, or are you just a pompous asshole?

      A few years ago, I (and a lot of other people), bought a Celeron 366A for $70, and overclocked it by changing the frontside bus speed from 66MHz (the default for Celerons) to 100MHz (the default for Pentium 3s), making it run at 550MHz. The fastest available P3 at the time was 550MHz, and it cost something like $500.

      This took about a minute to do, didn't require any extra cooling (except for $2 worth of thermal paste on the stock heatsink), and the chip has run flawlessly since then, giving me within 5% of the performance of a P3 550MHz in most applications.

      To summarize, I bought $500 worth of performance for $70. Or, I saved myself $430 by overclocking.

      Thousands of other people took advantage of this same underselling, it was a huge deal at the time. (Others might recount tales of overclocking the Celeron 300A to 450MHz in similar fashion -- it was a 'good year' for those chips.) Intel was selling these chips underclocked so as not to cut into the profits from the more expensive chips. (Today, in the case of new Celerons, they sell them with sky-high clock speeds to mask the fact that they've got horrificly poor performance.)

      Part of the draw was that you didn't have to buy some fancy heatsink or run your motherboard at some strange frequency, or have to have any idea what you're doing beyond a few simple steps.

      It's not usually quite that easy, and it's you're less likely to get the same 30%-50% clock speed gains with today's GHz+ chips, but there are still plenty of opportunities to get top-of-the-line performance from middle-tier chips without much cost or effort. Every time I build a new system, I look around to see whether any current chips in my price range are good overclockers. Sometimes there are, sometimes there aren't.

      My point is that not all overclocking is the same. What Tom's Hardware, and a lot of other enthusiast sites do is just 'experimenting' to get the most performance out of what is already among the fastest and most expensive chips out there.

      The article bills itself as a 'record attempt', not something practical or cost-effective. There is (as I've described) cost- and time-effective overclocking, but when someone breaks out the liquid nitrogen, it's pretty obvious that they're doing it just for fun.

      Ergo, I've never heard of Intel hiring someone for their expertise in overclocking, and I don't expect to.

      That's among the stupidest things I have ever heard. That's exactly what Intel and AMD do! Intel especially is focused on ramping up clock speed to get more performance out of the same basic chip. The only difference is that they control over more variables in the process. Sometimes it's in the design phase, but a lot of the incremental speed ups (From say 2.5GHz to 2.6GHz) come from just cranking the clock speed up and seeing if it still works. That's overclocking if you ask me. They just happen to be the ones that decide (when they lock the multiplier and label the chip) what's "over" and what's not.

      If that doesn't work, they rely on refinements in the manufacturing to give them more headroom. When they overshoot and make chips that can run much faster than they want to sell them -- well, that's where the overclockers come in.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    17. Re:Overclocking is stupid--No, make that "insane" by shanen · · Score: 1

      Well, I notice that you trashed all of my post except for the deliberately provocative introduction to the conclusion. You then ignored everything I actually said in favor of your favorite straw man arguments.

      Sorry, but I have worked in the computer industry most of my life, and I think the people who design CPUs are quite intelligent and good at their jobs. They design them to run properly at certain speeds, and you are a fool to think you can buy a $25 heat sink and outdo their test equipment. It is in their interest to make them run as fast as possible within certain constraints, mostly reliability and longevity, and that's what they do.

      Another item from my stint at a semiconductor maker was that I got to run some of the REAL test equipment. So long ago that I've already forgotten most of the details, but I think they were Teradyne machines that cost several million dollars each. They were designed to test chips hot and cold, though I don't even remember which liquid gas we used to chill them. Probably liquid nitrogen, actually, but I'm not even sure now. I do remember a fair bit about the results, however. When you pushed the envelope and ran chips hot or cold, they started getting flaky. Sometimes I would run the same chips through several times just to see how much variation there was on each pass, and you'd see quite a bit at the extremes. However, those testers and the tests themselves (called the test vectors) were well designed to reliably measure the performance of the chips under thermal stress.

      The only thing close to a real exception--which you didn't mention--was certain cases when the marketing people interfered. In some cases they actually did take faster CPUs and sell them as slower ones because there was too much demand for the lower priced CPUs and relative overproduction of the overpriced fast ones. Never as common as the overclockers like to claim, and probably never happens now. If they wind up with too many fast CPUs, they know they have to cut the prices more quickly, because the faster model is already breathing down their necks.

      The everyday reality on the product line is that the CPUs are properly tested with fancy testers and proper tests. The ones that are marginal are immediately marked for use at lower speeds--but only after those smart experts have evaluated the nature of the flakiness and have GOOD reason to believe they will operate reliably at slower speeds.

      Your example of the Yugo only reminds me of the story of the idiot who fastened a solid fuel booster rocket to his car. http://www.rocketcarstory.com/ is kind of a summary site for this probable urban legend.

      However, I will note the moderators are obviously pro-overclocking, since they modded your fluffy post up to the max.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    18. Re:Overclocking is stupid--No, make that "insane" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just hate the term HSF.

    19. Re:Overclocking is stupid--No, make that "insane" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still don't know why you care if someone else wants to go ahead and push their CPU.

      The designers test the CPU's for the max stability etc. Who cares if someone goes ahead and risks the stability to entertain themselves?

      And what's this "pro-overclocking" Is that like being pro-life? If it is I'm in favor of you going out and getting a life because you are way too involved in something no one cares about.

      They bought it, they own it, not you, it's not a child they're abusing, so your post was pointless. Just like this one.

    20. Re:Overclocking is stupid--No, make that "insane" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL,

      sorry for this late post, but let me point something out. A killing spree is insane, thinking you can fly in a giant paper airplane is insane, overclocking, not so insane.

      It's not like overclocking is going to cause a meltdown that takes out entire cities. Jesus from your post do you ever take a risk in life? I wouldn't even consider overclocking a risk but you sound like we're threatening the human race.

      I'm going to make shoes that say you can't walk more than 100feet within 5minutes at a time. You'd probably adbide by that rule.

  46. you're missing the point... by TheCoop1984 · · Score: 1

    The point of this is to see how fast you can overclock a normal processor using any means necessary. Says nothing about survivability of components, only the maximum stable (over ~6 hours) overclock reached. Think of it as a practical exercise.

    --
    95% of all computer errors occur between chair and keyboard (TM)
  47. is it me by segment · · Score: 2, Funny

    But does "Tom's Hardware" sound like a gay porn site name

    1. Re:is it me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know any to compare it to.

  48. Letter from the Editor by dsanfte · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dear Slashdot Reader:

    Thank you for pointing out to us the dangers of condensation. We have taken steps to address this problem.

    Instead of simply dehumidifying the air, in true Tom's Hardware Style(tm), our next overclocking attempt will take place in the vacuumn of space.

    Sincerely,
    Tom's Hardware

    --
    occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    1. Re:Letter from the Editor by utahjazz · · Score: 1, Informative

      Dear Poor Reader,

      The capacitors have liquid in them, he was mentioning the ice crystals to identify them. Try reading the parent again.

      Sincerely,

      Me.

    2. Re:Letter from the Editor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why do you say 'Tom's Hardware Style(TM?)'

      yes, i am new here

    3. Re:Letter from the Editor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you do it on the dark side of the moon, you won't require any liquid nitrogen!

  49. Talk about journalistic integrity! by Hobophile · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I saw this article over lunch today, and when I checked back just now I noticed they'd removed the page of benchmarks. One of the interesting results shown was that the Athlon 64 FX-51 managed to beat this overclocked behemoth in a couple tests.

    Only one or two, mind you, but it still boggles the mind that this Pentium running 2.5x faster than the Athlon chip didn't utterly dominate all comers.

    Given the history of THG and their decidedly negative (some might say Intel-funded) view of the Athlon 64 chips, it's not particularly surprising they'd choose to pull that page, but it does cast further doubt on the continued relevance of what was once a high-quality tech reporting site.

    The few posts questioning this on the THG forums seem to have disappeared in the time it took me to write this. Strange...

    1. Re:Talk about journalistic integrity! by Selecter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bingo - thats the reason I dont go there anymore. They are Intel fanboyz from way back and by experience I come to expect nothing but bias from them. Good catch.

    2. Re:Talk about journalistic integrity! by bogie · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not surprised, the P4 is incredibility inefficient always has been. The thing that REALLy gets my goat are these POS Celerons Intel pushs in low end boxes. These cpu's are truely garbage. I'd say the Celeron is the biggest disservice Intel has foisted upon the public. Poor consumers are wasting millions because they are misled into thinking a 2.6GHz celeron is actually faster than a 1.6 Duron.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    3. Re:Talk about journalistic integrity! by richcoder · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've never noticed the bias towards Intel from THG until your post. I went through all of the processor summaries from the past 2 years and your right! They constantly praise Intel and never pass up the oportunity to take stabs at AMD.

      Also, notice that Intel chips get plenty of there own articles while AMD is always placed in a comparison article that is bent toward Intel everytime.

    4. Re:Talk about journalistic integrity! by MikeCapone · · Score: 1

      I've never noticed the bias towards Intel from THG until your post. I went through all of the processor summaries from the past 2 years and your right! They constantly praise Intel and never pass up the oportunity to take stabs at AMD.

      One has to wonder if the fact that Intel is spending a bunch more than AMD on PR and freebies has anything to do with it...

    5. Re:Talk about journalistic integrity! by Saeger · · Score: 1
      The few posts questioning this on the THG forums seem to have disappeared

      Ahh! I HATE THAT! It's that kind of centralized moderator-nazi crap that keeps me away from most forums that aren't SELF-moderated and uncensored (like slashdot).

      (spare me the line about how it's not technically censorship unless it's the government doing it. thanks.)

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    6. Re:Talk about journalistic integrity! by Cyno · · Score: 1

      Funny how some think they can sway public opinion with censorship, huh?

      Subtlety makes all the difference. :)

    7. Re:Talk about journalistic integrity! by StarCat76 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Given the history of THG and their decidedly negative (some might say Intel-funded) view of the Athlon 64 chips

      Have you even read the benchmarks THG between the P4 and the Athlon XP 64/64 FX they did after it was released? They show how well the Athlon 64 chips do against the higher-clocked P4's, and consistenly recommend AMD's as more bang for your buck. But no, you heard from someome on /. that THG is biased against AMD, so it must be such.

    8. Re:Talk about journalistic integrity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's not technically censorship unless it's the government doing it.

    9. Re:Talk about journalistic integrity! by bigredlemon · · Score: 0

      It's hard to call a quacking duck a cow. Take a look at their "system" cost that they include into the CPU price. The P4 board costs $240 at my local store, and so they add $200 to the price. The AMD board costs $98 at the same store, and they add $200 to AMD's price. And even with that blatant cheat (which is seperated by three pages so you have to go back and forth to see it) AMD still creams P4.

    10. Re:Talk about journalistic integrity! by big-magic · · Score: 1

      The end of year CPU review on THG (posted on slashdot a couple days ago) recommended the Athalon 2600 (I think that was the model number) as the best cpu for the dollar. Maybe there is an Intel bias at THG, but this article made AMD look pretty good to me.

    11. Re:Talk about journalistic integrity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's not like Slasheditors have infinite modpoints, and mod anything critical of the manner in which this site is run into oblivion.

      Oh, wait...

    12. Re:Talk about journalistic integrity! by miracle69 · · Score: 1

      Isn't the 5Ghz mark the point where you're bumping up against Einstein? I.E. - the speed of light becomes a barrier because the electrons physically CAN'T make it from one end of the chip to the other before cycles are wasted?

      --
      Linux - Because Mommy taught me to Share.
    13. Re:Talk about journalistic integrity! by WhoDaresWins · · Score: 1

      Would you mind telling us what benchmarks those were in which AMD won? Also so you happen to have in your browser cache any of the benchmark images and if you could put them up somewhere?

    14. Re:Talk about journalistic integrity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah this pisses me off too, especially in notebooks. I've been looking for a cheap notebook but there's no way I'm getting some Celeron 2.2Ghz garbage eating up my battery life.

      Looks like it'll be an IBM R50 with Pentium-M 1.4Ghz for me. Much nicer.

    15. Re:Talk about journalistic integrity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the history of THG..

      And what would that be? Why do I get the feeling this is part of a smear campaign? Strange...

    16. Re:Talk about journalistic integrity! by Noren · · Score: 1
      Years ago, the THG site published some very negative reviews on Intel chips in combination with Rambus. These were very damaging to Intel and Rambus at the time... but the articles are no longer available on the site and the person who wrote them (Van Smith) no longer works for THG.

      After he left, THG retroactively edited authorship bylines on his articles. (his take) Not good journalism practice, and it was around this time when THG became very friendly to Intel and hostile to AMD.

    17. Re:Talk about journalistic integrity! by yourmom16 · · Score: 1

      yes, that is a problem IMO, however at least the post may still be read if your threshold is low enough, so it is better than the aforementioned systems.

      --
      "We have got to make Stan understand the importance of voting, because he'll definitely vote for our guy." - South Park
    18. Re:Talk about journalistic integrity! by AShuvalov · · Score: 1

      This is extremely important. Is there any way that anyone made a copy of pulled pages? Do you think Google may have them in cache somehow? Iny ideas?

      The thing is, this is a datapoint far down the Ghz line. A lot of estimates can be made based on this info...

      --
      Andrew
    19. Re:Talk about journalistic integrity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THG is also biased towards Nvidia cards. They refuse to believe ATI has the upperhand.

    20. Re:Talk about journalistic integrity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CPUs(electronics) don't follow Einstein's General Relativity.... they follow Quantum Physics, that btw, has no such "lame" limits :)
      []'s JPS

    21. Re:Talk about journalistic integrity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm
      "n't the 5Ghz mark the point where you're bumping up against Einstein? I.E. - the speed of light becomes a barrier because the electrons physically CAN'T make it from one end of the chip to the other before cycles are wasted?"

      Electrons dont travel fast, they travel a mm or 2 a minute.
      Look it up.

  50. Benchmarks? by Aaron+England · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Where are the usual pretty Tom's Hardware graphs? What the hell is a 5.25 GHz processor good for, if we can't awe over benchmarks like "time it takes to process a SETI unit" or its score in Sandra 2004?

    1. Re:Benchmarks? by Erik_ · · Score: 1

      Still partial to a Kernel compile time benchmark... for that matter, a bit more OpenGL benchmarks on XFree86 would also be welcome on their new huge gfx cards test.

  51. Correct me if i am Wrong by eadint · · Score: 0

    That is the stupidest way to use liquid nitrogen. all you would need to do is use a small dropping utility. (very thin pipe and drop it onto a copper heatsink the nitrogen will vaporize and remove the proper heat, if you need more cooling then you give it a larger amount of nitrogen. it looks like they way over cooled the thing and they probably destroyed the mother board, its freaks like this that give geeks a bad name. but my real question is, why did they use a crappy Intel processor. why not a power 4 or a p970, or spark processor. those processor's are designed to scale and are built better. you could probably get 6 or 7 GHZ on a p970.

  52. Why Why Why??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I keep finding myself wondering whether such extreme temperatures won't cause motherboards, surface mount components, and the like, to crack?

    But more than that, I find myself wondering about the futility of it all. Why do people devote so much time to overclocking, building replicas of things that are obsolete, or making things from scratch that whole R&D firms have worked on perfecting for less money. There's plenty of new things to invent / develop. Show some creativity, guys.

    Could it be that there's some practical point in overclocking? Maybe the mathematicians will tell us that there are some problems that can only really be solved by a really fast processor (i.e. can't readily be broken down into a task that multiple processors can tackle). If the Army secretly overclocks in order to break codes faster, I'd be interested. Otherwise....

  53. w0w! That's a lot of voltage by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 1

    it was shown that a core voltage above 1,880 volts

    Where the hell did they plug this thing into?

    --

    ----
    Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    1. Re:w0w! That's a lot of voltage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      didn't you see the nuclear plant in the background?

    2. Re:w0w! That's a lot of voltage by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      I sold an adjustable 2000 volt bench power supply on eBay last month. Now I know where it ended up!

      They gave me good feedback, anyhow.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
  54. Bah! by EnterpriseNCC-1701 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Bah! But Liquide Nitrogen is only 77K. Surely they can do better then that! :-P

    --
    "Most interesting how often you humans seem to obtain that which you do not want" -Spock
  55. Three Observations (Serious and Otherwise) by Nova+Express · · Score: 4, Funny
    1. Now this P4 is so fast that you can get a Windows Blue Screen of Death within seconds of booting it up!
    2. Watch it still lose to a Dual G5 in Photoshop bakeoffs.
    3. Check out this line from Page 11: " At this clock rate, however, benchmark tests were no longer possible." In other words, this overclocked beauty doesn't actually work at that speed! If it's too unstable to use for real software, it hardly counts as a real innovation.

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

    1. Re:Three Observations (Serious and Otherwise) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Fear not, fellow Apple fanboy. Noone is out to own your G5 with this overclocked monster. We already do that with current retail CPUs.

  56. Overclocking VW = been done by localroger · · Score: 1

    According to a mechanic I once knew, the tranny on a VW beetle will bolt directly up to the engine from a Porsche 928. He claimed to have done this once, and the vehicle made it 50 whole miles before all the oil came out the bottom (but it ran like a bat out of hell for those 50 miles, since a VW beetle weighs ~1500 lb compared to ~4500 lb for a Porsche 928). Oh, and it was a *bit* hard on the suspension, and they had to cut a hole in the rear hood for the engine to stick out...

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
    1. Re:Overclocking VW = been done by Johan+Veenstra · · Score: 1

      Well, if you want to overclock a VW beetle, do it right. Stuff a 8.2 liter Caddillac engine in the back and burn some rubber:

      http://www.500cid.com/mts/Rides/joe/index.htm

    2. Re:Overclocking VW = been done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You hear a story like this, and you think it must be some unsual thing. It's not. In my neighbourhood not a month passes that some fool doesn't crash into something with his tiny Honda that has a big Honda's engine in it.

      It's just normal.

  57. And in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People who drive over the speed limit are INSANE!

    It was not the intent of the people when they built roads to be driven on at speeds exceeding 55MPH.

    In other words, stop being lame, it's a hobby, people like to tinker see what their gadgets can do.

    They're not using these in serious scientific research so why do you care so much what they do?

  58. Re:It's all giggles until someone loses consciousn by lythotype · · Score: 1

    I had a science teacher do this once, but with breakfast sausage links in the fingers of the latex glove. A very effective demonstration! I thought something was strange when he turned around and had his back face the students when he put on the glove.

  59. Let them start by aliens · · Score: 1

    I can't wait for the posters:

    "Yeah but why would anyone need 5GHz??? That's way too much, I get by with my 286/386/PentiumI/II/III/IBM PCjr and anyone who gets something faster is wasting their money."

    --
    -- taking over the world, we are.
  60. Brainstorming by michaelmalak · · Score: 4, Funny
    From the THG story:
    With just weeks to go to Christmas, the THG crew got together to offer our loyal readers and especially the hardcore geeks among us something really special. Our brainstorming session quickly lead to extreme overclocking.
    Oh the creativity -- it's blinding! A computer hardware website investigating overclocking!
  61. Cray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that first Cray machines were cooled by some oil.
    Imagine Big tanks filled with cool blinkin lights.

  62. freezer by Attar81 · · Score: 1

    why not put the computer in a freezer?

    1. Re:freezer by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 2, Informative

      Some television engineers I know mentioned that they actually used this technique for mounting electronics in remote locations that needed to stay both temperature-controlled, and absolutely dust-free.

      So they took refrigerators and removed all of the shelving from the interior, drilled holes through the side (around the coolant tubes) to bring in power cables, data cables and such (the holes were then filled with expanding foam to make them airtight), and plugged it in.

      They said that every time they visited the site, everywhere else was dusty and dirty (and hot). Inside the fridge, it was cool (10c) and dust-free.

      Cheap way of making sure that things in remote locations stay working :)

      After watching those videos, I can't help but wonder why they were blocking out part of the screen on the CPU-ID program. What could've been so super-top-secret there?

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
  63. Uh... by EvilJohn · · Score: 1

    What's the point of overclocking to 5ghz, writing an article, and NOT RUNNING ANY BENCHMARKS?

    Sigh.

    --

    Less Talk, More Beer.
    1. Re:Uh... by tangent3 · · Score: 1

      Explained here

  64. It's About Comfort by meehawl · · Score: 1

    a lot of programs either dont make use of smp or use it very poorly for any number of reasons

    I'm well aware of that. I've been enjoying personal homebrew SMP rigs since the days of the P1. My approach has always been if you want it done properly do it yourself. Support has been improving, especially of late.

    Even without programs that intelligently distribute load across the CPUs, you can still use processor affinity to restrict one of the SMP-unaware processes to a single CPU, maxing it out, while you enjoy gaming (or whatever) on the other CPU(s).

    Really, no matter how fast you think your current CPU is, in a multitasking modern OS you would probably get abetter computing experience (less lag, reduced thrashing, smoother playback) with two (or more) slower CPUs taking up the slack.

    I have an old dual P3 1GHz that still gives me a smoother ride than my P4 3.2 GHz in work. If I was single-tasking, like running a demanding game exclusively, then that newer P4 is probably going to win out - but in that case I'd rather use a console, frankly. YMMV.

    --

    Da Blog
    1. Re:It's About Comfort by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      For a home user, what do they run that really requires multitasking? What applications need to be multitasked (with multiple CPUs)? I don't see too many. I mean, most home users do not even max out their single CPUs (except when playing games). Surfing the web, word processing, reading e-mail, playing games (not the high-end ones), playing MP3s, etc don't really need multiple CPUs.

      I've been using a home user a lot lately (since I'm unemployed) and I don't think multiple CPUs will really help me. In any case, I would think that home user applications are memory-limited.

      The only situation where I would look into multi-CPUs for home is when you are running some sort of server related task in the background (say you want to run a personal ftp server or something). Even then, I'm still not sure how benefitial multi-CPUs would be. The way I see it, single CPUs will dominate the home market for a long time.

      I was interested in multi-CPU systems when I was young (mostly because I couldn't afford it and thought they were great). But these days, I just don't see them being used in the home market. Most home user activities are memory-limited or video-card-limited.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  65. CPU, memory speed by Fig1a · · Score: 1

    So they couldn't get the last 15% out of it, because memory had to run in asynchronous mode, because the (bus?) clock multiplier wouldn't work with the actual memory speed?

    Do you have to be careful about this when you are building your own system? How many systems out there are running 15% under spec, just because some multiplier is wrong?

    Can someone please explain how to choose speeds for DDR memory, FSB, and CPU, so this doesn't happen?

    They also mentioned that it was because the memory was running at a latency of 3T. What difference does that make to having to run in asynch mode?

    How do you even know if you're running in asynch mode?

    Thanks for any info...

  66. This Looks Familiar by hao2lian · · Score: 1

    Didn't a group of people push processor limits to the max a while ago with liquid nitrogen too?

    --
    Pelé!
  67. But why overclock ??? by edufortes · · Score: 0

    Overclocking is nice, my Cyrix running at 233 is overclocked to 266 Mhz, too. But with the money spend in things like Liquid Nitrogen, and the older CPU, they can buy a SMP motherboard and 2 P4 at 2 Ghz or more. Almost it is the case in The Argentina. But, it's c00l to overclock for testing, or if you don't have the money to buy a new CPU

    --
    Eduardo N. Fortes
  68. Re:It's all giggles until someone loses consciousn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was the genius of Zollar's setup. There was a waist high table in the front of the lecture hall for doing the demonstrations. So for him to be behind there and fiddeling with stuff with his hands where no one could see them, would have been totally natural.

  69. Color me unimpressed by xtal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is basically dumping liquid nitrogen onto processors outside and clocking them up. There's not much of an achivement there. You can soak LEDs in liquid nitrogen and make them do all sorts of interesting tricks too. Whoop.

    Why not wait until someone comes up with a indoor version, properly vented and pumped, with a compressor cycle that you can actually use on a long-term basis? That would be an achivement I'd like to see. Of course, it's orders of magnitude more difficult and dangerous, too.

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:Color me unimpressed by Rower · · Score: 1

      Right here in West Columbia SC is a company called Kryotech, check out www.kryotech.com. They released the first commercially available 1ghz system back in 99. The system had a refrigeration compressor and worked out the condensate removal etc. They have actually stopped making their system because the chips kept getting cheaper and faster anyway.
      They were teamed up with AMD,as I recall a few months later Intel opens a small office here with a few engineers.
      I was checking out the Kryotech site once and found out one of their "technology" guys was a recent graduate of Midland Technical College with his HVAC degree.

      --
      Hooo Son! This'uns a Hawg!
  70. 4700MHz by xtturbo · · Score: 0

    jsut thought id point out that at the end of the article, in one line, it states that the system was only fully stable at 4700MHz. 5.25GHz crashed all over the place this isnt all that remarkable.

  71. Coolant Obsession by Rodrin · · Score: 1

    I remember years ago it was always talked about using Liquid Nitrogen to cool CPUs and it was like the one thing that a person could do that would be considered by the entire community as "wow." I mean if you could overclock that little 233mhz AMD up to 500 or so by sticking some liquid nitrogen AND figure out a way to keep all of the condensation problems away it was pretty cool. Now a days thoes problems have all been solved and Liquid Nitrogen is cheap. Now on to Beowulf, the term beowulf means very little, and it would be more accurate to just call it a cluster rather than a "beowulf cluster". At least thats from my experience in clustering.

  72. Another processor overclock? Bah. by HoneyBunchesOfGoats · · Score: 1

    When they figure out how to overclock the human brain, let me know.

  73. heatsinks by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 1

    It is well known that single crystal, isotopically pure diamond makes the best heatsink material, as this substance has the highest thermal conductivity of any known material. Engagement cpu anyone ?

  74. Relevance & Powermac by reignbow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A lot of people have asked about the relevance of this: Basically, there is none. But that's all right. It's a nice story to entertain their readers, and I'm willing to bet it was a lot of fun for them, too. Not everything needs to have a point, you know.

    That said, there's one thing that would still interest me: Now that we've seen them overclock that wimpy Pentium 4 (I hate that architecture! How can anyone build a 20-step pipeline?), let's have some real techno-porn: Liquid Nitrogen-cooled 2x2.0GHz G5 Powermac! That would be quite a sight to behold. Especially with that nifty 1Ghz FSB.

    --
    Divide et impera!
  75. Re:Looks like something any ordinary plumber could by Slack3r78 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You must never have read Tom's Hardware before. *EVERYTHING* they do is played up to man-on-the-moon levels, regardless of how trivial. You can either get used to it, or do like me and simply avoid Tom's as much as possible. :)

  76. FIshy video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another blah blah blah article. Anyway, I sometime spend time on blah blah blah things, and noticed that the CPU-Z 'screenshot' in the video, had the original P4 GHz-rating ghosted out. I don't understand- what's so secret about the GHz it was rated for by Intel?

    Since it's Tom's Hardware, I have a tendency to believe that something fishy is going on.

  77. Re:Another processor overclock? Bah. by 6ULDV8 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I overclocked for two years on Ritalin.

    --
    Pull my finger for my public key.
  78. ...and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So are these commercially available, for the cost of a regular CPU (eg Athlon 2500+), have warranties and take up the same size in general?

    If not then who fscking cares really? Sure its cool they have that much power. But then again look at those big G5 clusters.

  79. Re:It's all giggles until someone loses consciousn by pipingguy · · Score: 2


    Good one. The only other professor grosses-out students tale I know of is licking pee from a finger.

  80. People unclear on the concept. by blair1q · · Score: 2, Informative

    Liquid Nitrogen is cold when it's evaporating. You want it to be cold? Give it a flat surface to evaporate on, and keep pouring on the Nitrogen.

    Basically, if you lay a piece of Saran Wrap on your motherboard, then let the LN2 drip on the CPU constantly, you can cool that bastard to -195.798C.

    Making a big, tall tower just looks like a stupid Freudian mistake.

    Sorry Germans. No wonder they've lost every war they ever started.

    1. Re:People unclear on the concept. by arhines · · Score: 1

      The heatsink they used in the base of the copper tube provides a whole lot of flat, (relatively) warm surface area. I'm not sure how easily the LN2 can get down into the base of the heatsink, but it seems to have done O.K. This makes me think they should somehow 'inject' LN2 into the sides of the heatsink. A taller tube placed on the side would provide a pretty good pressure head...

    2. Re:People unclear on the concept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically, if you lay a piece of Saran Wrap on your motherboard, then let the LN2 drip on the CPU constantly, you can cool that bastard to -195.798C.

      Making a big, tall tower just looks like a stupid Freudian mistake.


      How are you going to drip liquid nitrogen? The little drops are going to evaporate before they hit the board. Its not like there isn't any evaporation from the big tube. If you fill the big tube you can leave it unattended. The Germans didn't lose any war from lack of engineering skills.

    3. Re:People unclear on the concept. by blair1q · · Score: 1

      little drops are going to evaporate before they hit the board.

      No they aren't. Evaporation isn't instantaneous.

      But if you like, put the mouth of the drip pipe a millimeter above the chip.

      The Germans didn't lose any war from lack of engineering skills.

      Actually, being unable to gauge force and supply levels so your fairly small, slowly resupplied army has to fight large armies on three major fronts, including Russia in Winter, is pretty bad engineering. Add to that the fact that many of their engineers were deliberately sandbagging projects, and yes, a lack of engineering skill was partly responsible for losing wars for Germany.

    4. Re:People unclear on the concept. by blair1q · · Score: 1

      The heatsink they used in the base of the copper tube provides a whole lot of flat, (relatively) warm surface area. I'm not sure how easily the LN2 can get down into the base of the heatsink, but it seems to have done O.K. This makes me think they should somehow 'inject' LN2 into the sides of the heatsink. A taller tube placed on the side would provide a pretty good pressure head...

      The inside of the heatsink is flat, but there isn't much heatsink beyond the tube. And they insulated the tube, so all of its heat has to get to the top of the column of nitrogen before it's exchanged with the evaporation. They're using the pipe as a thermal conductor, and the nitrogen inside is effectively a liquid-air insulator (don't quiz me on the thermal conductance of bulk LN2; I expect it's less than H20, and liquid coolers usually use recirculation (convection) rather than conduction).

      If they'd left the heatsink as-is, and injected or sprayed the LN2 onto its fins, that would have been the most efficient cooler they could have built from those parts.

      The condensation problem could have been handled by leaving the case on the unit; the evaporating nitrogen would displace all the other gases and create a positive pressure at the louvers.

      But they're too geeky not to want to "see" the electrical parts "working", yet not geeky enough to see that putting thermal insulation on a heatsink is a pretty big clue you've done something really dumb.

    5. Re:People unclear on the concept. by arhines · · Score: 1

      I'm not quite sure I see what you're arguing - almost all the heat is dispensed with through boiling the LN2, and through nitrogen gas escaping the top of the tube. The idea of LN2 cooling is not based on metal-to-air thermal conductance on any level, as any heat lost that way would be insignificant in comparison to the heat dumped out the top of the tube in the form of gas. Additionally, the tube would be very quickly caked with ice, which, I don't need to tell you, is not going to help cooling at all. If anything, the insulation probably kept the tube colder, because the outside air couldn't "warm" it up as much.

    6. Re:People unclear on the concept. by blair1q · · Score: 1

      If they were merely boiling the LN2, they didn't need the tube at all, which was my original point.

      And ice wouldn't be a problem any more than insulation would.

      As for that boiling, it will occur faster at lower pressures, so you still want a shorter column of LN2.

      I wonder if they couldn't have gotten the maximum cooling by removing the heatsink and the chip lid and dripping the LN2 directly on the silicon. It'd take a fairly sealed system to prevent contamination. Might be interesting to see how the mechanical properties of the chip hold up to that as well. It's been a long time since I was poking around in open, operating ICs, and I never tried to freeze one while it was running naked like that...

    7. Re:People unclear on the concept. by blair1q · · Score: 1

      This is what I was looking for. Hack one of these things to let LN2 right onto the chip face to get it down into the -198C range and you'll have a reason to use up this much slashdot disk space.

      Tom's Hardware are a bunch of candyassed screw-pullers.

  81. So how fast will it play QUAKE? by mnmn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder if you can attach quad monitors, quad mice and keyboards, and have a lanparty on once CPU. I know the radeon 9800 can go that far and already does miltiple monitors, I know of X projects to use multiple USB mice simultaneously and possibly multiple USB keyboards too.

    hmmmmmmmmmm`

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    1. Re:So how fast will it play QUAKE? by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      you might want to read about the xbox, neat new (computer) gaming console.. it can do all of this on a 4th of the hardware ;)

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
  82. Why the 'tower of power'... by caffeineboy · · Score: 1

    and why the copper pipe? If all you are really concerned with is putting LN2 on the cpu, just use a plastic pipe and seal it well at the bottom. It seems counterproductive to have good thermal conductivity through the thickness of the pipe...

    Unless maybe their pipe has a bottom to it, but that seems wrong as well. Seems to me that the heat would cause N2 cavitation at the bottom of the bath and reduce the efficiency of the cooling. I am not a refrigeration engineer, but this seems like it is hillbilly engineering to me.

    --
    +++ ATH0 +++
    1. Re:Why the 'tower of power'... by Cycline3 · · Score: 1

      That's fairly simple. It was answered with the flower shattering at the end. PVC cracks open with water frozen in it. Granted the end of this pipe is open, still as far as plastics go, PVC is fairly brittle and would likely shatter if you poured liquid nitrogen in it.

      I would say that is almost certainly the answer - plastic is too brittle at that temperature. If you'll also notice, the canister the liquid nitrogen is in is metal as well.

  83. Re:Another processor overclock? Bah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dunno about the brain, but you can overclock your penis. Just look in your spam folder :)

  84. Condensation by parkanoid · · Score: 1

    How did they prevent condensation from forming on the hardware? It sounds like the air would be humid enough.

    The blocked-out part you mention is where the model of the processor would normally live (i.e. the Mhz for intel cpus and the rating for AMDs). See here

    1. Re:Condensation by toddestan · · Score: 1

      My guess is that they make it airtight, and without people opening and closing the door all the time moisture is not going to be a problem.

      The concern I would have is that the equipment would produce enough heat to make the compressor run a lot, which would result in it failing, and once it crapped out the equipment inside would roast itself to death.

    2. Re:Condensation by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      In this case, it was only 10c, so there wasn't much chance of condensation forming (especially in a sealed environment, as you mentioned).

      I suppose it's possible for the compressor to fail, although I didn't ask, I'm sure they put some sort of temperature warning/shutdown device in there.

      Still, fridges are build pretty solid, the compressors are all totally sealed units and can run for years without any maintenance.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
  85. Is the heat getting to you? by Nuclear_Loser · · Score: 1

    The article does raise an interesting point in my eyes.. Modern Processors put out too much heat!

    I'm wondering when Intel and AMD will stop concentrating on speed (as at some point it may become less relevent, but not quite yet I guess) and start concentrating on lessening the heat generation.

    I for one pray for the day that even passive cooling becomes enough to run a pentium....
    As a side note to that, Via has managed to make processors that can be passively cooled, but they're much slower and equivalent to a P3.

    --


    You've got 8% of my love - 8% of my love - 8/100's of the time you're the only girl I'm dreaming of.
    1. Re:Is the heat getting to you? by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      What you are saying is not possible without switching to some new technology. The higher the clock speed, the more the heat. You just cannot get around that. The gates are switching faster and generate more heat.

      So to answer your question, you can never reduce heat without lowering the frequency. Maybe that's what you want. But if you reduce the heat, all that will do is to cut costs (lower cooling costs, lower energy costs, etc). Your performance won't improve.

      So, unless the heat loss costs are very high (not the case for consumer PCs), no one is going to try lowering the heat dissipation UNLESS that results in performance increase (this is possible as this experiment shows i.e. generating less heat means that you can increase the clock frequency).

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  86. Windows, Java, KDE will find a way to be slow by beforewisdom · · Score: 1

    Regardless of any hardware improvements :)

  87. Is it just me... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    ... or do the folks in those pix look like they are from Deliverance?

    It's scarry when world views collide...

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  88. Did anyone else notice.... by yangotang · · Score: 0

    That he used way too much thermal grease.

    Hell, i bet you he could've dropped the temperature even more by making that layer not as thick.

  89. Beautiful by TLouden · · Score: 1

    I'm adding this to my pr0n playlist. J/K, I don't have one but this is so awsome. I can't help but wondering how much it would cost to maintain that speed/temp with liquid nitrogen. It's kinda like the nuke-sub movies where the core reactor needs to be cooled but it leaks and over heats. Are we going to be seeing the same thing is super computing soon?

    --
    -Tim Louden
  90. catching up by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

    Finally, 5.25GHz is catching up to Athlon XP and the G4 on Distributed.net's rc5! :)

  91. NERD ALERT!!! by swordgeek · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hmm. Safety gloves? Protective glasses?

    You can definitely tell that these are computer geeks, and not chemistry geeks. Liquid nitrogen is remarkably safe stuff to play with, unless you're deeply stupid about it.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    1. Re:NERD ALERT!!! by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I think they had gloves and glasses... but no overcoats or aprons. Imagine if some nitrogen accidentally falls on your pants or something...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    2. Re:NERD ALERT!!! by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Indeed.

      Back when I was doing my Physics degree, one of the experiments in first year lab was on superconductivity. For this, we used liquid nitrogen to cool a ceramic (iirc) down enough to get it superconducting; I don't recall having any particular safety equipment. In fact, I have seen with my own eyes people dipping their fingers in to liquid nitrogen for long enough to flick some out of the container, with no ill effects. (Other than a bit of an ear-bashing from the lab staff)

      For that matter, a lecturer once threw some liquid nitrogen on to the floor just in front of a particularly annoyingly nerdy student (whose reply was, comically, a snort and "Good job that wasn't super-cooled liquid helium!"...)

    3. Re:NERD ALERT!!! by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1
      Liquid nitrogen is remarkably safe stuff to play with, unless you're deeply stupid about it.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban


      Nice .sig, there buddy.
      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    4. Re:NERD ALERT!!! by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      When the LN2 is boiling, it doesn't take a lot of bad luck to get a drop of it in your eye. Not fun, and might cause permanent damage. The safety glasses are a reasonable precaution.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    5. Re:NERD ALERT!!! by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Liquid nitrogen is remarkably safe stuff to play with, unless you're deeply stupid about it.

      How can you say this when we already know that the bad terminator from T2 was killed with LN2?

  92. ifs its not stable, its not an overclock by Kegetys · · Score: 1

    umm... So they are claiming a 5,25 GHz overclock, but it wasnt stable at that speed? Then i'd hardly call it a real overclock, I could propably clock my P4 to 5GHz too but it wouldn't work for more than a few microseconds. If they want to claim that kind of results they better show some long running stresstest/benchmark results too. And why is the stock clockspeed of the CPU covered in all the pics?

  93. Who'da thunk it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never thought I'd see the day that shit would run faster when you froze it.

  94. Imagine a ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YES!!! I DONT EVEN HAVE TO FINISH! You already know!

    abcdeghjijklamenessfiltersuxyz

  95. Why not just wait until the 10GHz is here? by qualico · · Score: 0

    All that work to go from 4 to 5 Ghz? Just seems a complete waste of time. They'll be comeing out with the 10Ghz in a few months. Besides, will you really see any speed difference? You not likely to say, "OH my God! My computer is just blazing now! Its the greatest mod ever accomplished!" Double the speeds, otherwise its just sillyness.

    1. Re:Why not just wait until the 10GHz is here? by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I think heat generated is non-linear with processor speed. So, overclocking a faster processor should be harder than a slower one. I'm not really sure though... I may be overlooking something...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    2. Re:Why not just wait until the 10GHz is here? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Try waiting a couple of days for a video to render or an integrated circuit to auto-layout.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  96. Where are the benchmarks? by Genghis9 · · Score: 1

    After seeing the clock rate they got, I really wanted to see the benchmark results. Do the numbers scale linearly from 3GHz?

  97. This really isn't special at all. by Zoson · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just an FYI, the boys in Japan have had a 5+ghz stable p4 since March.
    http://son.t-next.com/
    THG likes to say they do everything first, when in fact their p4 wasn't even stable at 5ghz. only 4.7ghz.
    And yes. It is excessive.
    -Zoson

  98. can someone explain this to me by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

    What does this mean:
    Before we got down to our actual record attempt, we checked the loading capacity of the materials and individual components. To do this, we placed the entire test construction in a polystyrene shell and installed it. ( source)

    I don't get the part about testing the loading capacity. What is that? And how do you test it by placing in in polystyrene?

    Thanks!

    Sivaram Velauthapillai

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  99. where to cool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    some nice pictures. where are the benchmarks?

    anyway /methinks if copper conducts heat so good,
    why ... aren't they cooling the acctuall pins
    of the processor? you know the pins sticking
    out at the bottom of a processor.
    i have seen some overclocking gadgeds that allow
    you to overclock a locked AMD processor it's
    basically somethins that you stick into the
    socked before sicking the processor into it.
    socket-to-"strange-thing(tm)"-to-locked processor.

    now if one would use the "strange-thing(tm)" as
    a means to cool the copper pins of the processor
    and since the copper conducts heat so good ...
    oh well nevermind ...

    "oh, off i go to build my nitrogen cooled cpu pin
    cooler" ...

    1. Re:where to cool? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      The heat sink contacts a heat spreader that contacts the chip. The pins are connected to very thin wires that connect to the chip. The pins also mechanically attach to an electrically insulating substrate (plastic or ceramic?) that contacts the chip. Neither the wires nor the substrate conduct heat nearly as well as the spreader.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  100. How Madison Ave. ate my Brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, never improve on any existing design. Just scrap it and buy something new. God forbid you ever upgrade your video card...

    The gearhead crowd is much maligined here (think primitive geek), and perhaps they deserve it (C-West wing on an Accord? oh puleeze), but some also race (err, SCCA). That rice burner may fit race restrictions better than a Beemer (not to mention the early Civics had a wishbone suspension. Something a BMW could only dream of in that price range).

    Better car as determined by whom? Yup, the NSX, WRX, Lancer, Skyline, RX-7, and 300Z were all just crap ;0). German cars have been coasting on reputation for years now. There really hasn't been much inovation there.

    When I had to commute through a moutain pass, I would regularly pass Porsches, BMWs, and a few Audis. My car was a fairly stock Subaru GL. I doubt the Porsches ever saw 60MPH in their lifetime. Not that I was going very fast, but I didn't have a year's salary swishing through the countryside. It's nice when you can actually enjoy the car.

    Can I assume you are fairly ignorant about automobiles or just shallow?

    1. Re:How Madison Ave. ate my Brain by mashx · · Score: 1
      Yes, petrolheads are maligned. Yes, the NSX, WRX, Skyline (at least up until the last version) etc were cool cars. Yes, I can easily believe you would regularly pass Porsches, BMWs and Audis.

      But (most) Japanese cars are just not as nice to drive as German cars. When you drive a BMW or Mercedes, you feel comfortable in them, whether at 40mph or at 120mph (the speed limit is just a suggestion!), because they glide, whereas the Japanese equivalents just feel that little bit rough. No doubt, the WRX or the Skyline can go faster than most, and are more fun, but as a car to enjoy, the German cars win out overall, because they have the speed, and yet the comfort as well.

      I'd love to say that there were better British cars, but things like the MGF don't measure up. The TVR wasn't bad, but its little annoyances means it is not as enjoyable. I can't speak about Aston Martin, having never had the opportunity, but it's not really British any more.

      So instead, why don't we just point and laugh at these guys?

      --

      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~
  101. Error in calculations by fedtmule · · Score: 2, Informative

    From the article: > In plain English: 84 watts on a surface of 1.12 > square centimeters - the size of a fingertip! > Extrapolated to square meters that make 840,000 > watts or 840 kW. Not exactly true. The true number is 10000 / 1.12 * 84 = 750 KW

    1. Re:Error in calculations by fedtmule · · Score: 1

      From the article: "In plain English: 84 watts on a surface of 1.12 square centimeters - the size of a fingertip! Extrapolated to square meters that make 840,000 watts or 840 kW. Not exactly true."

      The true number is 10000 / 1.12 * 84 = 750 KW

  102. Pure FUD by crimson30 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Have you even read the benchmarks THG between the P4 and the Athlon XP 64/64 FX they did after it was released? They show how well the Athlon 64 chips do against the higher-clocked P4's, and consistenly recommend AMD's as more bang for your buck.

    Are you talking about this article?: AMD's Athlon 64 Has Arrived: the Athlon 64 FX and Athlon 64 (and Intel's P4 Extreme) Reviewed

    First, there's no mention of "more bang for your buck" in said article.

    And while they do "show how well the Athlon 64 chips do against the higher-clocked P4's", they summarize it as such:

    "Summary: The P4 3.2 EE wins 32 times, the Athlon 64 FX-51 15 times - an uncertain 64-bit future for AMD"

    It reads like they're heralding AMD's demise!

    1. Re:Pure FUD by StarCat76 · · Score: 1

      The reference to "more bang for your buck" was not in reference to that article, but in several other articles of theirs in which they consistenly conclude that for the midrange, one is better off with AMD.

      As for their article upon the Athlon 64 launch (yes, the one you linked), although they conclude that the P4 EE was the best, anyone who would be reading said benchmarks would know that the P4 EE isn't a "real", consumer chip; it still can't be had under $1k. If one views their benchmarks not as Athlon 64 vc P4 EE but versus the general P4C chips, they demonstrate a quite strong showing for AMD; In my opinion, it does not appear indicative of true bias or corporate funding.

    2. Re:Pure FUD by duckyb · · Score: 1

      What really had me scratching my head was why they used a 5900 card as apart of the test bed while no other review site has or would in a performance testbed. All I know is that a while back there was a big stink as to why Tom's site was posting substantially lower scores than any other website (just speaking in general terms) in regards to the A64 & P4EE launch. Well if you look at all of the sites and compare the hardware there is usually one glaring difference... the video card. If you use a Radeon 9800 or anything ATI the scores shoot up in alot of benchmarks and the results seem to turn out completely different. Now it might be that some of the BIOS settings just happen to be not as aggressive as some of the other sites, but aside from that i can't think of anything else. Not try'in to start drama but just something I've noticed.

  103. Licking piss on network tv by Slur · · Score: 1

    This gag was done on St. Elsewhere. Doctor Ehrlich (Ed Begley, Jr.) demonstrates the taste test by dipping his finger in a sample. Then the senior Doctor Craig (Mark Daniels) says "nonsense!" and grabs the flask and dips his finger in the sample, tasting it himself.

    Then Doctor Ehrlich, horrified by the result of his prank, admits, "Whoa! I switched fingers. I thought you knew."

    That was a funny scene, but then most of the Ehrlich/Craig scenes were pretty funny.

    --
    -- thinkyhead software and media
  104. Caffeine by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    It is by Will alone that I set my Mind in motion,
    It is by the Beans of Java that the Thoughts acquire Speed,
    The Hands acquire Shakes,
    The Shakes become a Warning.
    It is by Will alone that I set my Mind in motion.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  105. DIVX - Games - Music by meehawl · · Score: 1

    For a home user, what do they run that really requires multitasking? What applications need to be multitasked

    So you never rip DVDs, convert DIVXs (or other CPU-intensive tasks), convert music files from mp3 into something else, do transcoding to fit mp3s onto smaller devices, or play games that want to grab an entire CPU?

    Live a little.

    --

    Da Blog
    1. Re:DIVX - Games - Music by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I haven't been ripping anything but I see your point. I guess multiple CPUs would help in that case... as far as games are concerned, most games cannot use multiple CPUs. There are some exceptions (I think Quake always supported multiple CPUs; probably other FPS games too, but things like RPG, RTS, action RPG, TBS don't really use multiple CPUs).

      If games started using multiple CPUs I can them becoming popular... but until then, I don't see it working (except if you are ripping something as you mentioned)...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  106. Speed Kills by rossy · · Score: 1

    Awesome effort by the THG folks! The equipment used by Sun and Intel for engineering characterization of these die is similar, but uses 3M Floronet and only goes to -40C. If they go use Liquid Helium, they would get closer to absolute zero, but Liquid Helium is more expensive (Helium is a rarer gas than N2). If only we had some Bose Einstein Condensate from Boulder Colorado (The Nobel Prize winner is there), we could cool the processor down to a few nano-Kelvin. -- Ross

    --
    Ross Youngblood
  107. Re:It's all giggles until someone loses consciousn by eyegor · · Score: 1

    I read a bit about him a few different sites. Sounds like an interesting guy.

    --

    Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.