Slashdot Mirror


Digital 'Ghosts' To Guide Students On Campus

Hambone.dk writes "The students at Copenhagen's new IT University will soon be guided by invisible, but talkative digital agents, known as ghosts or Disembodied Location-specific Conversational Agents. The ghosts are to compete amongst themselves for privileges such as better vocabulary or the ability to clone themselves. Ignored ghosts can die out completely. This project is a lot more serious than it sounds at face value - several papers have been published already."

266 comments

  1. Nearly-Headless-Nick or Peeves ? by Space+cowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What's to stop these ghosts being maliciously "trained" to give the wrong answer... I remember a teacher at college (Mr Tittershill), who was routinely used in a joke on freshers (report to Mr Boobershill at the senior common room, NOW! ...)

    Is it only me who first thinks of "how to game the system" when presented with a new technology ? Perhaps I should have been a hacker :-)) [note to US authorities - this is a joke, and I have no intention of committing any crimes (cyber- or otherwise) when visiting the USA]

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Nearly-Headless-Nick or Peeves ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do have to say if they are able to be trained wrong it will be abused. I for one would love to abuse the system and help in the wrong type of training =)

    2. Re:Nearly-Headless-Nick or Peeves ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      and I have no intention of committing any crimes (cyber- or otherwise) when visiting the USA

      That's because, with comments like that on your record you won't even make it past customs.

      Ashcroft

    3. Re:Nearly-Headless-Nick or Peeves ? by ericspinder · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Is it only me who first thinks of "how to game the system" when presented with a new technology ?
      NO, thank god. Your question is serious and important. It's sad that in today's world people feel like they need disclaimers(*) all the time. Any homeowner or business manager should look at his property like a thief, and not be appolgitic when he suggests that to others.
      * - Note that I am not trying to offend anyone, but am just trying to get my point across.
      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    4. Re:Nearly-Headless-Nick or Peeves ? by Carthag · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh, I can imagine a lot of things. Here at the department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen there is a running prank called pyxling. It's basically making anagrams of the signs (which have those little lego-like letter bricks).

      I'd give examples, but they're in Danish, so no fun for the majority of you. Use your imagination :)

    5. Re:Nearly-Headless-Nick or Peeves ? by basil+montreal · · Score: 3, Funny

      The beauty about systems like this is that it would take a large number of people deliberately "gaming" the system the same way to screw it up. The ghosts evolve and any deviations along the way are just that. Who knows, maybe your hacking the ghosts would actually add something to the final result.

    6. Re:Nearly-Headless-Nick or Peeves ? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, if it's a true learning system, nothing, of course. But if you've got competition, then either you'll need a large body of people to make sure the badly trained ghost stays fresh and popular, or it will get ignored and "die".

      For this sort of project I think you actually NEED people to try and abuse the system. If it's well designed, it'll help it get smarter. If it's poorly designed, then, at least, they'll be able to tell.

      Mind you, I think the whole think will fail for lack of computing power, though I think it sounds cool.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    7. Re:Nearly-Headless-Nick or Peeves ? by AGMW · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Oh, I can imagine a lot of things. Here at the department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen there is a running prank called pyxling. It's basically making anagrams of the signs (which have those little lego-like letter bricks).

      Boy, you Danes know how to have a good time eh! Rock On!

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    8. Re:Nearly-Headless-Nick or Peeves ? by Carthag · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's the only fun left to have when the beer vending machine in the cafeteria is run out & there's still a couple hours 'till the nearest bars open.

    9. Re:Nearly-Headless-Nick or Peeves ? by op00to · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, it's only you. You are the only person clever enough to come up with any way to "game" the "system". Good show!

    10. Re:Nearly-Headless-Nick or Peeves ? by RedCard · · Score: 2, Funny

      [note to US authorities - this is a joke, and I have no intention of committing any crimes (cyber- or otherwise) when visiting the USA]

      Truly, the terrorists have won.

    11. Re:Nearly-Headless-Nick or Peeves ? by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Rearranging the Soup of the Day sign at diners never gets old. There was a big bookstore across the street from my high school. They only built the sign 10 or 12 feet off the ground. I used to stand on top of my car and change the sign all the time. Having 2000 of your peers greeted in the morning with a sign that reads "Eat More Cock" was great.

      Hint for young pranksters: Steal a page from the movie Sneakers. Recreate the target sign using Scrabble tiles. Rearrange the letters in private. Standing in front of a sign trying to think of a clever phrase will get you busted.

      -B

    12. Re:Nearly-Headless-Nick or Peeves ? by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      Cold Pet Rat a-la-Simpson?

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    13. Re:Nearly-Headless-Nick or Peeves ? by skintigh2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Did you just give a disclaimer about your hatred of disclaimers?

    14. Re:Nearly-Headless-Nick or Peeves ? by NEOtaku17 · · Score: 1

      So what does being a hacker have to do with commiting cyber crimes...?

    15. Re:Nearly-Headless-Nick or Peeves ? by jdray · · Score: 1

      Nothing, unless you learned the term "hacker" either out of the U.S. Executive Branch's lexicon or from some stupid Hollywood movie that featured a "computer guy." I think this guy was just heading off any negative connotations by the INS, which probably got doses of both the above input streams.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    16. Re:Nearly-Headless-Nick or Peeves ? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm sure a bunch of pissed-off students (or student employees) could manage it.

    17. Re:Nearly-Headless-Nick or Peeves ? by basil+montreal · · Score: 1

      True, but the more people "training" these ghosts, the larger the concerted effort would have to be to mess it up. Eventually, all systems like this learn enough to discount erroneous data because after a set amount of time, the creators of the program would test them and evaluate them on their progress. If they have made negative progress, the habits they acquired would be discarded.

    18. Re:Nearly-Headless-Nick or Peeves ? by oerlikon · · Score: 1

      So, do they truly learn through interactions? Reminds me of that old Steve Martin joke about speaking 'wrong' when you're around 2 year olds. "So it's their first day at school, and they raise their hand and ask "May I mamoo dogface to the banana patch?"

    19. Re:Nearly-Headless-Nick or Peeves ? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Ah, but this is a continuous process, with AI breeding and competition. The way I see it, they're trying to avoid spending man-hours on oversight.

    20. Re:Nearly-Headless-Nick or Peeves ? by MrNixon · · Score: 1

      Yes he did.

      That was my good friend humour. I'd like you to meet him.

    21. Re:Nearly-Headless-Nick or Peeves ? by Dick+Faze · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Of course, this is a university campus, so by definition the "badly trained ghost" will be the MOST popular as people will be interacting with it two and three times to enjoy the joke, and they'll tell their friends about it as well. Meanwhile the "history of the lawn mowing patterns used in The Quad" ghost will 'self-terminate' a lonely, brief existence with but a wimper.

    22. Re:Nearly-Headless-Nick or Peeves ? by Popageorgio · · Score: 1
      You're not alone. Scott McCloud believes that childrens' tendencies to game the system are what inspire new technology and new uses for existing technology.

      Example: When McCloud's kids use KidPix, they co-opt the dynamite-style erase tool to make intersecting concentric circles.

      One could argue that gaming the system is the soul of creativity, since the world is just the ultimate system. Foucault would agree that we're all remixers.

      I know I'm drifting off-topic, but my point's that it's human nature to do something creative with someone else's creation. If no one had hacked rocks, we wouldn't have the wheel.

    23. Re:Nearly-Headless-Nick or Peeves ? by ugliness · · Score: 1

      Hint for young pranksters: Steal a page from the movie Sneakers. Recreate the target sign using Scrabble tiles. Rearrange the letters in private. Standing in front of a sign trying to think of a clever phrase will get you busted.

      or try this link

      --
      "...but destined to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology..." - FZ
    24. Re:Nearly-Headless-Nick or Peeves ? by darkgreen · · Score: 1

      I can only hope that you've been modded "Funny" because we're laughing at, not with you.

      =)

      --
      You don't need Geeksintraining if you're on Slashdot.
  2. Cool prank idea. by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


    Burn some toast at this university and make people think they're going mad!

    Victim: Did you hear that?
    Prankster: Hear what?
    Victim: Voices... ah forget it. Say... do you smell that?
    Prankster: Smell what?
    Victim: Burnt toa... uh forget it...

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Cool prank idea. by ssbljk · · Score: 1, Funny

      nice, we'll have digital Nearly Headless Nick

      --
      /ss
    2. Re:Cool prank idea. by ticklemeozmo · · Score: 1

      I'd like to laugh, but I have NO idea what this references. Can you help me out?

      --
      When modding "Informative", please make sure it both has a source and IS actually informative.
    3. Re:Cool prank idea. by Txiasaeia · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... or Nearly Analog Nick ;)

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    4. Re:Cool prank idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Smelling "burnt toast" is a symptom of some psychiatric diseases.

    5. Re:Cool prank idea. by squidfood · · Score: 2, Funny
      Victim: Did you hear that?

      "In the mean time, Kent, stop playing with yourself ."

    6. Re:Cool prank idea. by essreenim · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, I'd use my ghost to conduct an experiment on womens response to:

      "Wanna f***"
      If the ghost is not slapped, then cool
      If slapped, then,...so what..knowledge would've
      been gainef, eh?

      Nice

    7. Re:Cool prank idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you elaborate on this? More links to info?

    8. Re:Cool prank idea. by MadHobbit · · Score: 3, Informative
      The only source for this that I know of is that smelling burnt toast is one of the best known 'auras' preceding seizures. Many people with a seizure disorder / epilepsy experience some sort of warning sign beforehand - this is one of them.

      It's mentioned here.

    9. Re:Cool prank idea. by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      "Listen! Do you smell something?"

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  3. sheesh ka bobs will this help the blind? by CreamOfWheat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ..helping steer blind/disabled students around campus?

    1. Re:sheesh ka bobs will this help the blind? by gears5665 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the blind people I know are more able to get around campus than some of the sighted folk.

      While your heart is in the right place...you understimate and insult through your ignorance a very capable sector of our society.

    2. Re:sheesh ka bobs will this help the blind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      hile your heart is in the right place...you understimate and insult through your ignorance a very capable sector of our society.
      Obviously you've never found yourself drunk at a party where the only available designated driver is blind.
    3. Re:sheesh ka bobs will this help the blind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The example of incompetence, here, would be the designator who may, or may not be, blind.

    4. Re:sheesh ka bobs will this help the blind? by ryanwright · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While your heart is in the right place...you understimate and insult through your ignorance a very capable sector of our society.

      I chose to respond rather than mod you down:

      Quit your P.C. whining. Nobody is insulted unless they choose to be insulted, in which case the problem lies with them. As you yourself said, his heart is in the right place, so your response is unnecessary.

      You really can have this one of two ways:

      1. You can accept that people are ignorant about a disability and choose to appreciate their help, however unnecessary it may be.

      2. You can choose to be insulted and become a P.C. weenie, bitching and moaning and berating people who have nothing but good intentions. End result, that person will never again offer their assistance to a person with a disability because you've made them feel ashamed of themselves for doing the right thing.

      I suggest number one. It makes you look like less of an ass and doesn't discourage people. Maybe the blind people you know are very capable who don't want any help, but there are others who aren't as capable and actually appreciate the assistance. Don't leave them out in the cold by turning away those who would seek to help them through your P.C. nonsense.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
    5. Re:sheesh ka bobs will this help the blind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need to focus on specific students.
      Just teach ghosts to give a tour which includes a silly, impossible and/or highly undesirable place. So at that point in the tour they'll all acquire a similarly limited vocabulary of reactions.

    6. Re:sheesh ka bobs will this help the blind? by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 2, Insightful

      2. You can choose to be insulted and become a P.C. weenie, bitching and moaning and berating people who have nothing but good intentions.

      Based on your post, it seems that the same can be said of Un-P.C. weenies. Do you really think that the grandparent post had such bad intentions?

      You know, this whole concept of "P.C." has really run its course. All we have now are two sides. Both of them complain that the other side is putting them down for no reason, both insist on the right to speak their mind, and both probably have good intentions most of the time.

      What's the f*#$ing difference between them anymore?

      I mean it. Consider that any of these insults could apply to either side equally well:

      Nobody is insulted unless they choose to be insulted, in which case the problem lies with them.

      This applies just as well to both gears5665 and ryanwrights' posts

      As you yourself said, his heart is in the right place, so your response is unnecessary.

      Likewise.

      I already commented about that "#2" from the parent post. Here's my favorite part:

      Maybe the blind people you know are very capable who don't want any help, but there are others who aren't as capable and actually appreciate the assistance.

      The irony is that the granndparent post said exactly the same thing. The grandparent post replied to a post which claimed that blind and disabled people might need help by stating that the some blind people (the ones "he knows") wouldn't. Both of you are saying that some blind people might need help, but that many don't. What bothered the grandparent post was the implication that _all_ blind and/or disabled people needed help.

      The grandparent poster may have read too much into the great-grandparent post. Maybe. But that's about it.

    7. Re:sheesh ka bobs will this help the blind? by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      the blind people I know are more able to get around campus than some of the sighted folk.

      No. Not all of them anyway. You don't want me to provide examples, but I can if you really me want to.

    8. Re:sheesh ka bobs will this help the blind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you insulting bastard, more fun to prank the thing and have it steer blind/disabled students into each other, then everyone can bet on last man standing, best scream, etc.

  4. Delca by mknewman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Very impressive text to speech technology, but I didn't see much in the way of a demo on the site given.

    1. Re:Delca by Carthag · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can click the round bubbly icons to get text read to you. It sounds like it's prerecorded, though, as the text read and the text displayed is subtly different (there's a split infinitive in the sound that's fixed in the text, for example).

    2. Re:Delca by tigersha · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the speech synth really interests me. Currently we are running critical and informational events through a combination of mbrola and festival, which is quite good but that voice is really nice!

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    3. Re:Delca by Tree131 · · Score: 0

      The technology is there, however it is limited to basic commands. You can try out TELLME (1-800-555-TELL) - it's free. It's not AI, but their speech recognition is pretty good, and their major investor is AT&T, where the technology was developed (as mentioned in the PDF link in the article). Go figure...

    4. Re:Delca by ryanwright · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >> Very impressive text to speech technology

      Agreed; I'm very interested to know how I can get my hands on the same TTS engine & voices they're using. Also would love to know how they interfaced voice recognition & response with ALICE. It would be wonderful to wake up in the morning and ask basic questions, such as "What is the weather like today?", and get an appropriate response regardless of how the question was formed ("how's the weather", "get me the weather report", etc). Would be even more fun to let friends converse with the "A.I.".

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  5. Well Shit on Me by illuminata · · Score: 5, Funny

    College kids can breathe easily. For once, it's not the acid talking.

    --


    Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
    1. Re:Well Shit on Me by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah but when we're drunk, we may try to pick the ghosts up - especially if they have a sexy female voice.

    2. Re:Well Shit on Me by og_sh0x · · Score: 2, Funny

      He-lo the-arr Ted. Wou-ld you lah-ik to come-with mee to my roo-amm and have-a goo-ahd tiy-am?

      If such a program would have to learn how to survive, that might be one way. But it would be a little bit like dating a vacuum cleaner with throat cancer.

    3. Re:Well Shit on Me by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      Beggars can't be choosers. Besides, it might lead to less ego-destroying vacuum hose incidents in single Engineering students.

    4. Re:Well Shit on Me by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Welcome to Elron Hoover's First Church of Appliantology!

      "You must go into the closet..."

      "What?"

      "And there you will have ... lots of fun."

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  6. hear voices by millahtime · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is this a shrinks delight??? A campus full of people hearing voices.

  7. Wasn't this done sort of already by nberardi · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wasn't this sort of already done with the GotDotNet Terrarium Project, it's not as intelligent but it sounds like the same idea.

    1. Re:Wasn't this done sort of already by bkhl · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and in Avalon.

    2. Re:Wasn't this done sort of already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the fuck is this the same idea? Yeah, I guess. A slingshot pellet is a lot like an airplane, too.

  8. Oh! Papers have been published! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Then it *must* be serious...

    1. Re:Oh! Papers have been published! by NaCl · · Score: 1

      Maybe they deserve an Ig-Nobel?

      --
      I shot the sheriff
  9. SHODAN by plams · · Score: 5, Funny

    When that female voice started speaking in that flash thing I almost thought it would say, "Look at you Hacker... Pathetic creature of meat and bone.."

    1. Re:SHODAN by grub · · Score: 1

      +1, System Shock Rocks!

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:SHODAN by plams · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Heh. But seriously, they have a lot in common - listen to these samples of background ambience to accompany the voice. Here's a bunch of nerds that actually understands how ambient sound can change the atmosphere completely.

      For instance, in System Shock - the first time you hear SHODAN speak, she's just giving you a standard greeting ("Welcome back to Citadel Station.."). But all the time there's this evil drone in the background that starts low but keeps intensifying. SHODAN makes no threats, nor states anything evil - but that ambience, the drone, tells you that something's definitely wrong, and you should be very affraid:)

    3. Re:SHODAN by Bugmaster · · Score: 1

      Well, not to mention that in System Shock 2, her voice actually gets completely corrupt... It sounds as though she has multiple personalities, most of which are totally insane. She still says rational things though, which makes it all the more frightening.

      --
      >|<*:=
    4. Re:SHODAN by Rallion · · Score: 2, Funny

      I actually have aSystem Shock 2 sound scheme going on my machine, I replace pretty much all the sounds for any app. Start-up? "I am Shodan." Shutdown? "That...h-h-h-h-hacker destroyed my primary data loop." Girlfriend signs on AIM? Xerxes says "Hostile AI detected."

      The best thing about it is that it scares the shit out of everybody.

      Downside is that it still scares the shit out of me, too.

    5. Re:SHODAN by bloodgroove · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This bring up the idea of an audible body language for these ghosts. Effectively background music or noise but once you got used to it you could use it to determine the ghost's mood, intentions, playfulness, etc. Whether or not the ghost actually has any feelings is moot as long as the interaction with the ghost can replicate more real human interactions. Ghosts might then have a auditory presense when they're around so that we can know that it's there instead of being surprised with a disembodied voice. An interesting question is would the ghost be allowed to change it's own "body language" or is it a fixed entity like our own presence in a room. And if it can change it's "body language" like we can, is it programmed that way from the get go, or does it have to learn it's own habits and change them accordingly. This could be an effective way to teach a ghost how to lie. The real question in all of this I guess would be what does PMS sound like?

  10. The ramifications are endless by Loco3KGT · · Score: 5, Funny

    Could you imagine this in your house? Your wife could be out grocery shopping but you'd still hear her voice yelling "DID YOU PUT THE LID DOWN?" upon leaving the bathroom.

    --
    Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    1. Re:The ramifications are endless by petabyte · · Score: 5, Funny

      "HARCOURT FENTON MUDD!!, WHAT DID I tell you ..."

      "Stella nooooooooo ....."

      Hopefully these processes aren't threaded.

    2. Re:The ramifications are endless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm having tribble getting that one.

  11. thats not news by theMerovingian · · Score: 3, Funny


    invisible, but talkative digital agents

    I've been dating her for years!

    --
    "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
    1. Re:thats not news by Pinkoir · · Score: 1

      Wierd...'cause the "digital agents" I've been dating for years never say anything at all...

      -Pinkoir

    2. Re:thats not news by kpaul · · Score: 1

      Duh. That's because you have to provide the voices.

  12. Great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Get ready for the Marketing Ghosts assaulting you on every street corner...

    I can barely wait...

    1. Re:Great. by lionchild · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Get ready for the Marketing Ghosts assaulting you on every street corner... There's an upside to that: If you ignore them enough, they die off...unlike current marketing firms.

      --
      Awk! Pieces of eight. Pieces of eight. Pieces of seven... ERROR: General Protection Fault. [Paroty Error.]
    2. Re:Great. by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      >There's an upside to that: If you ignore them enough, they die off...unlike current marketing firms.

      Great, that's even worse, only the ones you can't ignore will survive and keep getting harder and harder to ignore. I guess kindof like real life marketeers.

    3. Re:Great. by |/|/||| · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Ah, but only if everyone ignores them. Telemarketers would go away if everyone ignored them, but unfortunately that is not the case.

      I find myself becoming less and less tolerant of advertising, as it becomes more and more prevalent. I wonder if anyone else feels this way. The only radio stations that I can stay on for more than a couple of minutes are the listener funded ones (like KEXP), and there's no way I can stand to watch TV anymore. I can tolerate banner ads as long as they're not animated, but anything on the web that delays me from the actual content gets closed and forgotten.

      I hope I'm not the only one who would be extremely pissed to have audio advertisements bombarding me on the street corner. If they can't be avoided, then they will have to be destroyed; and society should not consider those who do so to be vandals.

      Before you draw a parallel between these 'audio ads' and billboards (which also cannot be avoided) note that human vision is much more focused and selective than hearing - I can't just point my ears in a different direction.

      --
      [javac] 100 errors
  13. Who ya gonna call? by Gulik · · Score: 5, Funny

    And, of course, to augment meager stipends, PhD students can get into the business of helping freshmen figure out how to get the ghosts to leave them the Hell alone:

    ``Sir, what you had there is what we refer to as a Disembodied Location-specific Conversational Agent, or a Class 5 Full-roaming AI. Really nasty one, too.''

    1. Re:Who ya gonna call? by Xpilot · · Score: 1

      Great, now I got that Ray Parker song stuck in my head, no thanks to your post.

      --
      "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    2. Re:Who ya gonna call? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More scarily, it's just made me realise that Ghostbusters was damn near 20 years ago now. Oh boy, that makes me feel old..

    3. Re:Who ya gonna call? by AGMW · · Score: 3, Funny
      Great, now I got that Ray Parker song stuck in my head, no thanks to your post.

      HA! I ain't afraid of no post!

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
  14. Meddling punks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would have got away with my tenure position and crappy directions it if it wasn't for those meddling kids.

    1. Re:Meddling punks by pc-0x90 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the pesky aibo

  15. Hint. by hookedup · · Score: 4, Funny

    Turn down your speakers before clicking the second link.

    This is slashdot, so I'm assuming you've already come this far down the page and have yet to click the link.

    1. Re:Hint. by gavri · · Score: 1

      I clicked on the 'Reply to this' to reply to your comment, but i'm still not going to click the links in the story.

      I'm on slashdot everyday and it's been months since i've read an article.
      This is slashdot, so i'm assuming you'd understand.

  16. Re:obligatory liberal slant by OECD · · Score: 4, Funny

    will the ghosts specifically tell perspective women students that they are victims of a male dominated society?

    Nah, they got teachers for that. The ghosts will tell them that those jeans really do make them look fat.

    --
    One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.
  17. Hmm... by Mindcry · · Score: 2, Funny

    and if the Disembodied Location-specific Conversational Agents disembody students, do they get free lunch?

    anyways, sounds kinda cool... though i bet it'd be a bit hard to get used to... unless you already hear voices, in which case...

    1. Re:Hmm... by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      and if the Disembodied Location-specific Conversational Agents disembody students, do they get free lunch?

      That's funny (weird), as I was thinking exactly the same thing earlier reading about the new $4,000 dancing robot. What if we gave our creatures a sense of inquisitiveness, and they decided to take stuff apart to figure it out? What if a human ended up erroneously being part of that stuff? Who would be sued?

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  18. I can't wait till some college pranksters hack it by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just like in Real Genius...

    Prankster: "This is God talking. I want you to... blah blah blah... Oh, and by the way: stop masturbating."

    Student: It is God...

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  19. First, the human frogger... by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1, Troll

    First, the human frogger on "Seinfeld". Now, they are turning college campuses into Pac-Man? "Inky, Blinky, and Clyde: coming to a college near you!"

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:First, the human frogger... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      More like Gauntlet: "The freshman is about to flunk!"

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:First, the human frogger... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pacman already hit college campuses last year:

      McMaster University

    3. Re:First, the human frogger... by Discoflamingo13 · · Score: 3, Funny

      When I was in college, we used to say Gauntlet-esque phrases all the time -

      Use caffeine to stay awake later! (Walking past vending machines)
      Cafeteria food takes 50 health! (Taco Pizza . . . again)
      White freshman is about to die! (Kegger)
  20. feelings??? right. by blue_adept · · Score: 5, Insightful

    from the website project pages...

    "the ghosts are not only able to talk and think like human beings they are also emotional and sensitive spirits. the ghosts have feelings and highly complex sets of behaviors"

    this is very misleading. natural language processing and complex behaviour is one thing, but to claim that these programs have "Feelings" is just ridiculous.

    --

    "Is this just useless, or is it expensive as well?"
    1. Re:feelings??? right. by thelasttemptation · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To be honest, the same can be said about you...

      natural language processing and complex behaviour is one thing, but to claim that these meat puppets have "Feelings" is just ridiculous.

    2. Re:feelings??? right. by blue_adept · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh, I'm pretty sure *I* have feelings, seeing as you just hurt them.

      --

      "Is this just useless, or is it expensive as well?"
    3. Re:feelings??? right. by Carthag · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's just a temporary chemical imbalance. It'll pass. :)

    4. Re:feelings??? right. by thelasttemptation · · Score: 1

      Did ja think bout the 'ghosts' when you made your comment?

      Well, anyway, the point is, you can't really proove that you have feelings nor that something doesn't. Feelings are one of those things that mean different things to different people. /me shrugs

      Tis life, so unknown.

    5. Re:feelings??? right. by dave420 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      If something's programmed/conditioned to respond to certain stimulii, and those stimulii reflect something people recognise as emotional triggers, technically it can "feel emotions". After all, that's just what we do.

      Sure, it's weird to say that, but it's technically true :)

    6. Re:feelings??? right. by cmstremi · · Score: 1

      natural language processing and complex behaviour is one thing, but to claim that these programs have "Feelings" is just ridiculous.

      Try telling that to Number Five...

    7. Re:feelings??? right. by blue_adept · · Score: 1

      By your argument, we would have to assume that rocks and pebbles have feelings too, since we can't prove they don't.

      --

      "Is this just useless, or is it expensive as well?"
    8. Re:feelings??? right. by thelasttemptation · · Score: 1

      No, you don't have to assume anything, but you can't prove otherwise.

    9. Re:feelings??? right. by |/|/||| · · Score: 1
      Ah, but a rock cannot argue that it *does* have feelings. If it did so, how would you prove it wrong?

      --
      [javac] 100 errors
    10. Re:feelings??? right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I burned my mod points already, but...

      +1 Funny

    11. Re:feelings??? right. by blue_adept · · Score: 1

      Then I guess we both agree that the researcher's claim that the ghosts have feelings are exactly as valid as my claim that rocks and pebbles have feelings. Neither can be shown to be false. But both are absurd.

      --

      "Is this just useless, or is it expensive as well?"
    12. Re:feelings??? right. by thelasttemptation · · Score: 1

      My point is it's absurd to assume anything does or doesn't have feelings. How can you tell?

    13. Re:feelings??? right. by greylouser · · Score: 1
      There are essentially two ways you can approach the problem of feeling, and psychologists (like me) have had to deal with the problem before. The first is introspectionism (pioneered by Wundt), wherein you know you have feelings because you can think about your own internal state, and understand the way you're feeling. That is, you know you feel happy because you feel happy. As a research technique, it involved performing some task and then giving a long log of your thoughts and feelings. Unfortunately, it's pretty much completely bogus as science, since people can lie about their introspections.

      From an introspectionist perspective, you can't know if these ghosts have feelings, because you don't have direct access to their consciousness.

      The response to introspectionism was behaviorism, wherein you know what you're feeling not because you can measure your own internal state, but because you can measure the way other people behave around you. That is, you know you're feeling happy not because you feel it, but because other people are smiling at you, laughing, etc. Behaviorism doesn't really seem exactly right from a personal perspective, but from a scientific perspective it makes a whole lot of sense. Alan Turing was essentially being a behaviorist when he realized that the best way to tell if a computer was intelligent was to see if people could tell the difference between a computer and a human in a conversation.

      So from a behaviorist perspective, These ghosts only have feelings if we treat them like they have feelings. If we do, they do. If we don't, they don't.

      (Old behaviorist joke: Man turns to a woman after having sex, lights up a cigarette, says "It was good for you. How was it for me?")

    14. Re:feelings??? right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps we are all just ghosts in a shell...

  21. The Plan by GAVollink · · Score: 1

    1) Create talking devices, and tune them so that they are not ignored. 2) ???? 3) Profit!

  22. Big whoop by stratjakt · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Disembodied Location-specific Conversational Agents.

    ELIZA + text to speech + speaker and microphone = "ghost".

    They can spaz up the website with promises of artificially sentient beings with real emotions and the ability to learn, but of course thats horseshit.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Big whoop by fingusernames · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My thought EXACTLY. There are so many young people out there who don't know what has been done before. I just came from their web site, and the demonstration "interaction" between Alice and the supposed user reminded me STRONGLY of using ELIZA years and years and years ago. They have spruced it up, sure, and added good text recognition and speech, but it still seems to be based fundamentally on an Infocom-like adventure game text recognition system underneath. The bit where, and I paraphrase, she says she "appreciates his polite style, but it is ambiguous: please use what, where, when" instantly clued me in to that. Hell, I remember writing an adventure game engine in BASIC back in the 80s that did a decent job of parsing human text and figuring out what was wanted. I would have hoped that in the intervening DECADES, natural language recognition would have progressed a hell of a lot more than what appears to be the case. I'm sure in fact that it has, actually. Maybe just elsewhere.

      I was at an ACM presentation not long ago, and some PhD was talking about this cool project he had done. Likewise, it looked functionally VERY similar to how one interacted with those old text Infocom games. Lots of the young kids ooh'ed and ahh'ed over it. I mentioned this similarity afterwards, and he actually got a bit irritated. I suppose people are supposed to have forgotten about that, so it can be re-invented in the 21st century.

      Larry

  23. Holly! holly! holly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sorry dave

  24. reference to taboo-ed technology in parent by nietsch · · Score: 1

    windoze links on slashdot? For shame!

    --
    This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
  25. hmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Im looking on their website and on the Spiritarium page under Ghost Gallerty there is a listing for Bill >>Gates(GATEKEEPER)... wasn't there a movie with a Bill Gates type person that had a security software called GATEKEEPER that had backdoors built into it?

    1. Re:hmm.. by kalaef · · Score: 1

      I believe the movie you are thinking of is "The Net" with Sandra Bullock.

    2. Re:hmm.. by Jexx+Dragon · · Score: 1

      I believe that was "The Net" Good Movie too

      --
      I don't have time to comment my code, the program is late already.
    3. Re:hmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Saying that "The Net" is a good movie on Slashdot is like walking with an Al Queda T shirt through US Immigration. Are you sure you want to do this?

    4. Re:hmm.. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      yeah - like the bit with the IP address that had an 'octet' over 300 :-P

    5. Re:hmm.. by RichardX · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, you appear to have mistaken "Good" for "So damnably godawful I'd rather sit through all 28 hours of 'Goatse: The Musical' while having my pubic hairs plucked one by one than ever watch even a minute of that film again"

      It's an easy mistake to make though, so you're forgiven :)

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    6. Re:hmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      time to call the ghostbusters. yeah... hmm.

  26. No one steps on a church in my town.... by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    They'll pull the plug on this project as soon as a giant marshmallow stomps the campus chapel.

    "I find her interesting because
    she's my client and she sleeps above her covers- FOUR FEET above her covers"

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:No one steps on a church in my town.... by Psiren · · Score: 1

      "She barks, she drools, she snarls!

      It's not the girl Peter, it's the building!"

      I really can quote most of that film. I really am that sad! ;)

  27. Polytechnic NY by Smidge204 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Makes for happy Moose"

    Sorry, but this reminds me of the hauntings of my college... though I've never heard of any students being helped by them...

    I think the problem here is they are not passive enough, at least that I can tell. The last thing anybody wants is an emotional, talking version of Clippy talking to you as you're walkingdown the hallway...

    "Hi! You look like you're lost! Do you want directions?"

    "No. Go away."

    "I'm sorry, I don't know where that is."

    Man, Douglas Adams must be spinning in his grave...
    =Smidge=

    1. Re:Polytechnic NY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The Moose does not think, the Moose knows!"

  28. Ahh, something like Harry Potter's marauders map by bigattichouse · · Score: 4, Funny

    "I solemnly swear I am up to no good" would be the verbal queue to summon the ghosts that tell you where you can score beer (if underage), change security codes, hook up with other evil doers, and basically build a nice treatment for a little summer hacker movie.

    --
    meh
  29. What did you catch today, Egon? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    "What did we catch today, Egon?"

    "Well, let's check the traps: 3 repeating phantasms, 18 roaming terminal vapors, and 6 semitranslucent sessile spectres. Oh. I went back to Columbia University and picked up some of those new invisible, but talkative digital agents"

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  30. M$ Word Paperclip anyone? by DarkkOne · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I mean, it doesn't have an AI (Microsoft instead opting to go with their proprietary Artificial Stupidity) but doesn't it somewhat seem like a prototype for this idea. I mean, an artificial helper that guides you around software isn't too different from one that guides you around a physical location. But in all seriousness, instead of location specific ones, wouldn't you rather have a personal ghost? You decide it's appearance on your PDA/Wearable Computer/Whatever, you adjust its personality via programming or learning capabilities. You get to the campus, and it wirelessly logs onto a local server, gets a layout, and comparing your schedule develops a path to where you need to be, and on demand (or wim, if so programmed) gives you directions? Sure, location specific ones are a neat idea, but personal ones seem like they'd be alot more useful.

    1. Re:M$ Word Paperclip anyone? by System.out.println() · · Score: 4, Funny

      Microsoft instead opting to go with their proprietary Artificial Stupidity

      That's hardly proprietary. I mean, look at slashdot.

    2. Re:M$ Word Paperclip anyone? by mod_critical · · Score: 1

      If it is anything near as obnoxious as the MS paperclip I'm staying the hell away from Copenhagen. (At least the OpenOffice light bulb dosen't dance and make noise.)

    3. Re:M$ Word Paperclip anyone? by nfgaida · · Score: 1

      Posters on slashdot are artifical?

      --
      *elevator music plays*
    4. Re:M$ Word Paperclip anyone? by dave420 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Location-specific ghosts are just that - they belong to the location. To the instutution they "haunt", it's more important for those ghosts to be theirs. Would you create a system where any script-kiddie can walk in and upload their own code via wifi? exactly. Especially seeing as these ghosts sound like future replacement for staff (with all the responsibilities/abilities that implies). Imagine going into a shop with your own personal check-out boy/girl, and have them run behind the counter to serve you. Not exactly a nice idea for the shop owner - strangers in the till, no guarantees they're not ripping you off. That's exactly what having a personal ghost interacting with a building/institution is like. Having ghosts that were built for a specific area also means they can be programmed to suit that area better (ie they know the fire alarm test is in 2 minutes and warns you not to spill your coffee, or that the west stairway is less crowded in the afternoon). It must be very difficult to convey flow through buildings in an XML file, adequately enough to be of use.

      And, dude - You don't see microsoft going on about "linsux", do you :-P

    5. Re:M$ Word Paperclip anyone? by DarkkOne · · Score: 1

      First and foremost: I just enjoy joking about Microsoft. I also make fun of the Gamecube because to me it looks like a plastic purse. In the case of the latter, I still enjoy using it.

      Anyway, on to topic. From the descriptions and such, the ghosts may wander the location, and that's fine, but some attach themselves to a user. I see some ghosts, like welcomers, being attached, but for the purpose of guidance, why not have something that exists in your personal hardware of choice, uploads NOTHING (or minimal amounts, say the electronic equivalent of a businesscard, saying "Person X has arrived") and downloads whatever information is publicly available, like floorplans, event schedules, and whatnot.

      I don't know about the world as a whole, but I'd much rather interact with a pseudo-AI of my choice more often, and just see the ghosts as the occasional "Welcome" "Coats may be checked here" "This exhibit shows..." kinds of things.

    6. Re:M$ Word Paperclip anyone? by dave420 · · Score: 1
      That's it - the ghost isn't attached to a user, any more than a web server is attached to the browser. It serves whoever needs help, whenever, whereever.

      A personal ghost wouldn't have the authority to fill in the paperwork to lend you a notebook from the computer lab. A personal ghost probably wouldn't be able to query databases for you (that would be a big security risk). If the ghost remains part of the institution, it can better act like an employee and less like a guest (or is that ghuest? :-P). As I said before, personal ghosts would be like taking your own shop keeper with you when you went to Vons. I'd rather have the Vons dude check out my Fudge'Ems. ;)

    7. Re:M$ Word Paperclip anyone? by DarkkOne · · Score: 1

      Adressing your concerns:

      The ghost isn't directly attached to a user, no. But at the same time it has a duty to make sure User0 gets what he/she needs. But what's harder on a server, streaming a video of a 3D rendering at 1600*1200 resolution, lossless, to several people, or sending those same people a much simplified version of that rendering in object code upon request, and letting their machines do the work? If they want it lower rez, they can get it that way, but if they want it in full glory they've got that too. And all at lest cost or stress for the server. That's what I'd suggest, where the data's local, but the interface is more personally oriented.

      Paperwork: How much moreso would a local ghosts than a personal. If you give the local ghost your information, what's different about your personal ghost submitting the very same data via WiFi, except that it's probably faster?

      As for querying databases, your personal ghost wouldn't need direct access... If you can ask the local ghost, your personal ghost can just as easily request data on a subject, and a daemon can then handle it in much the way the local ghost would've.

      Again, I'm not saying to remove the idea of local ghosts. I'd just prefer a personal one in most cases. And I'm not really trying to start an argument, I'm really enjoying your points, as it's helping me clarify my idea.

    8. Re:M$ Word Paperclip anyone? by dave420 · · Score: 1
      The inventors of this idea aren't going for the "thin client" approach. They're talking about limited physical manifestation. In the PDF on their site (I read it :-P) they talk about a ghost appearing as a slight blurring in the corner of a web-page the user is browsing. That would take mere bytes to achieve, and would be very difficult to achieve via your own hardware in your pocket.

      Giving your information to the ghost host (fnar :-P) in the described situation is a trivial. There's no risk to you or the receiver when all you're doing is transferring data. I'm talking about real risks, like a ghost being able to open the garage doors for you, or enable an elevator. There, the ghost would have to be provided by the owner of the doors/elevators, as giving away control of those systems to some arbitrary external code would be potentially disasterous. A ghost attached (physically and logically) to a user would limit its usefulness, severely.

      The main database would be foolish to trust everything that requests data from it. Even giving it access could be dangerous, as exploits aren't unknown (especially on MSSQL! oy!), so having a large database of people and their movements isn't something institutions want falling into the "wrong hands", even if from a purely legal point of view (if it was in the UK, they would have violated the data protection act, and recieve heavy penalties for a breach). Due to that fact alone, policy would stop external ghosts connecting the mainframe. Talking to a ghost is a different kettle of fish altogether, as it would be very, very hard to break into a database via voice recognition (although, give MS 2 weeks and I'm sure they could manage it :-P)

      If there was a way to make trusted ghosts (palladium? something similar?), then yes - that would be the perfect method. They would also have to standardise a way of representing life in a specific area to such a degree of accuracy and portability, otherwise a ghost that works in starbucks could go to pot in WalMart (for example). So, once you have a way for a ghost to tell the main server it's a good ghost, and a way for the server to tell the ghost everything it needs to know, personal ghosts would be the best thing to ever happen to the world of PDAs. Personal Digital Apparition :)

      Without trust, the further away from the main server a ghost is, the less effective it is.

    9. Re:M$ Word Paperclip anyone? by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      > But in all seriousness, instead of location specific ones, wouldn't you rather have a personal ghost? You decide it's appearance on your PDA/Wearable Computer/Whatever, you adjust its personality via programming or learning capabilities.

      Damn, straight. Except, they're called Personcons! And mine will say nothing but Chii.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    10. Re:M$ Word Paperclip anyone? by RichardX · · Score: 1

      *points at the wall* Hideki!

      Don't forget your mobile - though I could probably live without Sumomo's wake up call.. :)

      Okay, so Persocons* aren't likely to happen for some time, but I was thinking, theoretically, these ghosts could be given a kind of real presence..

      If the ghost's host/server contained a map of the area the ghost inhabits (haunts?), and users were to wear some kind of semitransparent display glasses (VR style, but seethrough) onto which the ghost could be superimposed.. and the user's display reported it's location/heading/etc back to the host.. well, then, you could effectively have these ghosts wandering around in a real location.

      I know, the tech's not there yet, and everyone else seems to have lost interest in the idea of wearable stereo displays.. but I still think they're a neat idea, damnit

      (*) For anyone who's wondering WTF Persocons are, it's from a manga/anime called Chobits. It's from the "supernatural girlfriend" school of Manga, and is really very good if you like that sort of thing, which I do. Lots of fan service, too, and quite 'ecchi' in places :)

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    11. Re:M$ Word Paperclip anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I'm pretty sure that all the stupidity around here is natural.

  31. STFU switch? by AndroidCat · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Hi, I see that you're trying to locate a dealer on campus!"

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  32. Re:DLCA?? (never mind) by Insightfill · · Score: 0

    (on second thought - the school is in Denmark - and probably the DLCA doesn't apply.)

  33. The Word Paperclip by Geancanach · · Score: 5, Interesting
    From the paper:

    1. Ghosts are mostly invisible or only vaguely visually manifested 2. Ghosts are often bound to a specific location which often has a very special relation to the ghost 3. Ghost owe their twilight status to some unfinished business and they are therefore active and striving 4. Ghosts only appear when called upon or if they feel an urge to manifest themselves

    These ghosts sound a lot like the microsoft word paperclip. Is that damn thing going to start talking now?

    1. Re:The Word Paperclip by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Informative
      Is that damn thing going to start talking now?

      Not without a clever hack. Clippy is a Microsoft Agent, and could easily use any text-to-speech engine that works with SAPI4, except for two things: (1) the Clippy .acs is specifically flagged not talk, so you can't make it talk even in your own app, (2) Office sets text-only output even if you reg-hack it to use a talking agent like Merlin or Genie.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:The Word Paperclip by chihowa · · Score: 1
      shudders

      Your post seems to imply that you've actually tried to make it talk...

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    3. Re:The Word Paperclip by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Well yes. I thought I had my evil bit flagged...

      I've done .. questionable things .. with Clippy. You can use him in your own code (violating the Office EULA), or even use him on a web page or an email/Usenet post. (If the reader allows HTML, and allows script, and has Win98SE+, and has Office installed in the usual place...)

      However, I've yet to try remotely launching Clippy on boxes with the DCOM security hole open. Some things are just too evil even for me!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  34. This reminds me of a web site..... by orthogonal · · Score: 2, Funny
    The ghosts are to compete amongst themselves for privileges...

    Hell, Slashdot is already full of "ghosts" competing for mod points.

    ...such as better vocabulary or the ability to clone themselves.

    Of course, it would be rediculus to expect the Slashdot "ghosts" to loose their limited vocabularies.

    And none of us really expect to ever have the ability, let alone the opportunity, to reproduce.

    1. Re:This reminds me of a web site..... by mo^ · · Score: 1

      And no matter how much you shout at them they will prattle on irregardless

      --
      bah!*@%!
  35. I'm sorry. by Soko · · Score: 4, Funny

    I just can't accept this at all.

    I mean, a Clippy for college campuses, disembodied from MS Office?

    It looks like you're drunk and lost. Would you:

    - like directions back to the dorm
    - like directions to the nearest park bench
    - like directions to the nearest sorority party
    - like another beer
    or
    - like directions to Cowboy Neal's house?

    Say "More" for more options, "OK" to choose one or "Go Away" and I'll leave you alone. Until I see you peeing in a bush, when I get to be helpful again!

    Sorry, Fuck Off isn't one of the options. Here they are again.

    It looks like you're drunk and lost...


    Soko

    --
    "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    1. Re:I'm sorry. by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Funny
      If it detects that you're drunk, it'll probably switch to Zork just to mess with you:

      Welcome to Dungeon.
      This version created 30-AUG-90.
      You are in an open field west of a big white house with a boarded front door.
      There is a small mailbox here...

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  36. What's next? by DjMd · · Score: 1

    Holographic trees?

    In memory of a real tree

    --
    DJMD - The fourth man - Planetary
  37. Agents by electric_penguin · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm all for it. As long as he looks and sounds like Orlando Jones.

    1. Re:Agents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I liked the remake of Time Machine too. When we can all have agents wandering around telling us interesting facts, I want mine to be either Orlando Jones or Morgan Freeman.

      Morgan Agent: I see that you've just received a package from SCO. Would you like me to examine its contents for you?

      AutoZone CEO: Why, yes, thank you.

      Morgan Agent: [discovering what's inside the package] Tell your people to stay away now, stay away! DARL MCBRIDE HAS GOT THE UPPER HAND!

  38. To steal a joke from South Park... by Tax+Boy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Students getting advice from ghosts in Denmark?

    Shakespeare already did it.

    1. Re:To steal a joke from South Park... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Shakespeare already did it.

      He stole it from Strange Brew.

  39. wikipedia by an_mo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... obviously you have never seen the wikipedia. To put it in somebody elses' words, "with many eyes, all bugs are shallow". This principle does not apply to software only.

  40. ghosts play pranks too by lockholm · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Ghosts use every means possible to get the users attention and affection but their modus operandi varies in accordance with the preferred segment of users they try to reach. Some rely mostly on entertainment e.g. by becoming popular as respected opponents in the local computer game, other use the assistive interaction as their preferred metier. Some perform practical jokes, some are 'jack-ass'ing', others rely on more innocent ways of entertainment (like the singing sisters street performing at second floor) while a few are responsible polite and earn their ITU's[positive feedback] from maximizing the standard of their services.

    I bet the freshmen are easy targets...

  41. PR nightmare by Ssbe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This technology mixing AI and artificial voices seems really cool, but comments like

    "Ghost are almost living beings like you and I"

    need to go if they want the public behind it. No matter how complex the AI is or how real the voices seem, they aren't the same as humans. And while they are at it change the name of the AI beings. The word ghost already has a very defined meaning ... and it's not a good one. Remember what happened with the American car "nova" or "no go" in Spanish? This really could turn into a PR nightmare for these guys. Which would stink because the technology definitely looks interesting.

    1. Re:PR nightmare by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Informative

      Remember what happened with the American car "nova" or "no go" in Spanish?

      A myth, an urban legend.

      To summarize the snopes entry..

      First of all, you wouldn't say "no va" in spanish, you'd say "no machina", "no functiona" or "no trabaja" (doesnt work). "Don't go" is slang from ignorant english folks, it doesn't translate. Apologies for my bad spanish.

      Secondly, it's like saying an english speaker wouldn't buy a dinette set under the brand name "Notable" because it says "no table". The legend insinuates that the spanish are somehow stupider than we are. (Like the myth of africans being shocked to see baby food on store shelves because they cant read and just look at the pictures and assume thats what's in the jar)

      Thirdly, the punchline of the story is that Chevy changed the name to "Caribe" and sales took off. But, Volkswagon already sold a "Caribe" in Mexico - it was the Golf here. The name "Nova" was never changed in mexico.

      Lastly, there's a brand of gasoline in Mexico called "Nova". It sells fine.

      Basically it's just a subtly racist urban legend. "Dem wetbacks is so stupid they tink Nova means No Go!"

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:PR nightmare by dave420 · · Score: 1

      That's the thing, though - people need to have a reference in real life if you're going to explain abstract concepts to them. Telling a layperson that this software gives them a "ghost" to talk to/ask stuff off, they'll know exactly what you mean - something/someone who's not physically present, yet floats around you telling you stuff. I think you don't give people enough credit when it comes to naming things. If calling them "ghosts" is a bad idea, how about the success of Dirt Devil? People can see past that. They know it's not actually a devil who eats dirt, just like they'll know these ghosts aren't WiFi-enabled poltergeists :-P

    3. Re:PR nightmare by kundor · · Score: 1

      Actually, claims like that are intriguing. Treating them as living beings (well, dead beings, I guess) will get much more interest than calling them "agents."

    4. Re:PR nightmare by aWalrus · · Score: 1

      That's hogwash. Both the Nova reference and the argument. The Aibo is called a dog (or similar) everywhere, and that hasn't affected its sales.

      And, as another poster pointed out, the Nova thing is an urban legend (I'm Mexican). Perhaps the dismal sales of the car had more to do with the fact that it was a piece of shit?

      --
      Overcaffeinated. Angry geeks.
  42. Oblig Simpsons by da3dAlus · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the Simpsons Smile-time Variety Hour spinoff:
    Marge: "Homer, why are you hiding?"
    Homer: "You said today we were having a special g-g-ghost today!"
    Marge: "No, I said we were having a special GUEST. Mr. Tim Conway!"
    Homer: "What's a Tim Conway?"
    Tim Conway: "Oh, about a hundred-seventy pounds."

    --

    Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion.
  43. our turn and adjusting prices.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is it just me, or have we all moved to the finance boards?

    Renski

  44. Wow by ElGnomo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This has got to be one of the coolest things I've seen on slashdot. Not only is text to speech interfaced with most of the services of a fully wifi college ( the elevators, printers, music are accesible by ghosts ), but they've given each ghost a unique personality and history to boost! almost makes me want to learn danish and transfer to Copenhagen!

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you will get by just fine with english only

    2. Re:Wow by fallen1 · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I'd like to lick my Danish* and move to Copenhagen as well. OH, wait, you said learn Danish. Oops... ;-)

      *Yes, I mean a _female_ Danish.

      --

      Dream as if you'll live forever.
      Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
      ~Anonymous~

    3. Re:Wow by eoyount · · Score: 1

      Mmmmmm...danish.

      --
      To understand recursion,
      you must first understand recursion.
    4. Re:Wow by Bish.dk · · Score: 1

      Not much reason to learn Danish. International master programmes are available.

  45. Excellent. We can look forward to Clippy 2.0! by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    Why is it researchers always seem to think that systems that think for themselves in a "human type" way is a Good Thing. Time and time again
    they have proved to be rubbish. If people want human like interaction they generally prefer another human and they expect machines to be
    logical, to the point and do exactly what they're instructed to do. I'm sure this is a very interesting project from a research point of view but I
    seriously question its true usefulness.

  46. Too much by mod_critical · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This seems to me to be going quite a bit overboard...

    If the purpose is to provide a useful resource to the people who will engage these ghosts, then I see far to much work going into the AI. A helpful computer contains what you want to know and provides an effecient interface for extracting the information.

    Not that this project is not of great interest to me from a research standpoint, but perhaps the most useful faceless computer interface wouldn't be one that is trying to gain popularity and lock the morons in the closet.

  47. These muggle are getting sued by orthogonal · · Score: 1

    The students at Copenhagen's new IT University will soon be guided by invisible, but talkative digital agents, known as ghosts or Disembodied Location-specific Conversational Agents.

    This just in: Darl McBride and David Boies will team up with JK Rowling to sue IT University for using "Harry Potter Intellectual Property".

    They are asking for "injunctive relief against IT University's further use or copying of any part of JK Rowling's copyrighted "Hogwarts" and "Harry Potter" materials and also [requesting] damages as a result of these muggles' infringement in an amount to be proven at trial."

  48. Competing agents... by CarrionBird · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It will be very interesting to see how these "ghosts" compete with each other for resources, as the plan suggests.

    Will they play nice, or do what ever it takes, to survive?

    How do you code competitveness? (or spell it for that matter)
    --
    Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
    1. Re:Competing agents... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
      That's what I was wondering as well - will they lie to you if their 'survival' is at stake? Humans do lots of not-so-nice things to each other, and behave quite differently when backed against a wall.

      It would seem to me that coding a survival instinct could be counter-productive at times.

      Are these ghosts capable of...murder? (cue spooky music)

    2. Re:Competing agents... by Rick.C · · Score: 1
      How do you code competitveness? (or spell it for that matter)

      Two questions, one answer: "C"

      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
    3. Re:Competing agents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as a coworker of mine demonstrated with some early versions of a simulated life environment, anything using some form of a fitness function will optimize themselves to take full advantage of any bugs in the system. expect no less from these ghosts.

  49. Now I can honestly get another 2 POW points! by Chemisor · · Score: 1
    print1 ("Do you believe in ghosts? [yn] ");
    if (ynq1 () == 'y') {
    powpts += 2;
    print2 ("I do! I do! I do believe in ghosts!");
    morewait ();
    clearmsg ();
    }
    omega sources, char.cc:554
  50. Not quite right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Snopes as a source? Snopes lost any reputation it had with its silly defense of Gore when Gore claimed to have invented the Internet. If you want the real facts on what Gore said, you have to look at the CNN transcript, and read up on Internet history. The Snopes entry seems to be written by a Democratic Party hack.

    Basically it's just a subtly racist urban legend

    There is nothing racist about it. You are making things up. Perhaps you are the racist: you used the word "wetback".

  51. Time Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ALLL RIIIIIGHT!!!

    Someone else liked the remake of The Time Machine!

    Woo hoo!!!

    I knew there had to be at least (well okay, only) one other person who did.

  52. Help me out here... Eliza with a fancy flash site? by Featureless · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They have a good web designer and have clearly purchased the top of the line speech synthesizer (which has recorded canned audio clips narrating a few snippets of text for them)... they claim "all the voices you encounter on this site are generated by computers." Congratulations. Kraftwerk has been doing this trick since the 80's. Musical stings to provide ambience for different "ghost activities..." Little PHPbb posts about each ghost's personality that sounds like something cut from Starship Titanic's promotional materials...

    The papers on their site that I've skimmed were extremely "light." They were at least suggestive of interesting ideas (albeit ones that have a nothing to do with AI and everything to do with human-computer interaction... "ambience," new ideas for interfaces, which seem promising or at least interesting). Their "main paper" is a 404.

    So they're not exactly leading with the great breakthrough that makes their ghosts possible. Can anyone more familiar with the project comment? It looks like a lot of fancy dressing on the same kind of waste-of-time vanilla AI project (yet-another-unambitious-stab-at-natural-language- processing) that's been going on in countless CS departments around the world for decades...

    What's the real meat of this project? Have they really accomplished anything of interest from an AI or user interface perspective? Or is their main accomplishment an unusually skillful PR coup for themselves?

  53. Aalborg by Nightreaver · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sounds great. Hope the find there way to Aalborg University... *hint hint*

  54. It would be really fun... by wolenczak · · Score: 5, Funny

    Being a comp sci. student at a large university, it would be really interesting to try gaming the system and have it make jokes or funny things to the new students. And believe me, all that bunch of technogeeks will have serious fun with the ghosts.

    "hi, i'm are your ghost guardian and will assist you while you get familiar with the campus. Cheerleader's Stripshow at 7pm in womens changing room, just make sure to reserve your seat in advance at the administration. Having problems with your teachers? Dr. Berger just loves the patriots (as well as entrance tickets), Mrs. Allison favours basketball players, and Dr. Palmer is into... ehemmm.. umm... well, you'll find"

    1. Re:It would be really fun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brian. Is that you. Now I know who started all of this and paybacks are hell!

      Dr. Palmer

  55. Microsoft... by 1ridium · · Score: 1

    Lets be glad Microsoft isnt making this or else we would end up with clippy being able to anoy us everywhere we go! ahhh!

    --
    Make it idiot-proof and someone will build a better idiot.
  56. Re:DLCA?? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 0

    Can't you read behind the acronym? DLCA?? Good Grief! It's only one letter off of the DMCA,

    1) the acronym is DELCA, not DLCA, so it's not even close to DMCA

    2) Even if it was DLCA, just because you change a letter in order to crack a poor DMCA joke in your post doesn't make it funny

    Why you're modded +3 Funny is beyond me...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  57. Red Queen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Reference to "Resident Evil")

    "you're all going to die down here"

    Must be a funny university to go to when that message is played.

  58. One step closer to the metaverse. by phosphorous · · Score: 0

    I just finished reading Snow Crash, and this makes it sound like we might not be so far away from such things as the digital librarian or the "You Are Here" function. Do these ghosts have any kind of rudimentary AI? Can you ask them to find out the nearest pub or if a certain book is in stock at the student bookstore, for instance? Would be pretty cool if you could ask them things they weren't specifically programmed to process. Interesting too, to see what kind of emergent behavior might evolve.

  59. Hrm. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

    Sounds like Colin from Mona Lisa Overdrive.

    At least, I think it was Mona Lisa Overdrive.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  60. In best Picard voice ... by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

    Computer, what is the current location of our Disembodied Location-specific Conversational Agents overlords?

    --
    Bark less. Wag more.
  61. Agents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firstly they'll try to wipe out all the humans because they consider us to be a disease afflicting the planet. When this fails, they'll work out how to clone themselves so that all the agents start wearing olive suits, dark glasses, speaking in a strange stilted manner and looking suspiciously like Lord Elrond. I knew I shouldn't have taken the red pill.

  62. Re:Wtf are you talking about? by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
    Kids...

    It's from The Wizard Of Oz film (don't recall if it's in the book).

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  63. HK-47 by MattRog · · Score: 3, Funny

    I would rather HK-47 would chat it up:
    "Hello meatbag... err.. master."

    "It's just that... you just have all these squishy parts, master. Not to mention all the water - how the constant sloshing doesn't drive you mad I don't know."

    --

    Thanks,
    --
    Matt
  64. Cool! A top-level flash page! by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

    Cool! A top-level flash page! No text navigation!

    Who ARE these morons? Have they never read a web usability guide?

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  65. ick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flash site. Now, that's scary and worrysom.
    If they insist on breaking standards, then their project is probably just as shallow and bling bling, so it's not worth the time. Thanks, please try again later.

  66. New Study aides? by blahlemon · · Score: 1

    If the ghosts are learning, how long would it take for a ghost near a lot of engineering students to become valuable by parroting equations or exam answers?

    --
    It take more faith to believe in evolution than it takes to believe in God
  67. Mod parent funny. by LeoDV · · Score: 1

    I actually laughed. :-)

  68. And the winner is.... by maddogdelta · · Score: 1
    Marvin, the paranoid android...

    "Brain the size of a planet and they want me to open up a file...Pardon me while I solve the string theory for the internal construction of a black hole..."

    --
    -- There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
  69. Obligatory Highlander quote.... by fallen1 · · Score: 1
    Well, since ghosts are effectively immortal (barring power failure) then I would guess they might not play fair... There can be only one!

    Talk about interesting. What would happen if one ghost developed a homicidal instinct and "killed" another ghost? AI-icide? What if it decided its feelings were hurt by a student and then, oh, DoS'ed their university internet connection? Hmmmmm.

    --

    Dream as if you'll live forever.
    Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
    ~Anonymous~

  70. Denmark, eh? by jpellino · · Score: 2, Funny

    So the first batch of ghosts will start with "Daddy" to be followed by Yorick, Ophelia, Polonius, Rosencrantz, Guilderstern, Gertrude, Laertes, Claudius and finally... Hamlet?

    Sorry, couldn't resist.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:Denmark, eh? by Plammox · · Score: 1

      Yup, something is indeed rotten in the state of Denmark.

  71. anyone remember Dr. SBaitso? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    listening to the examples of talking it sounds like a better sounding Dr.SBaitso (from the classic Sound Blaster days..) It just says the same things in a different way to certain keywords.

  72. Pah, if they'd just use MacinTalk ... by KlaymenDK · · Score: 1

    ...they'd even get it to sound okay in Danish! Trust me, I've tried this -- back in '84 or so.

    --
    Talking Moose, I miss you. :o(

  73. For those not old enough to know... by Chemisor · · Score: 1

    In case you are too spoiled by the flashy graphics of today's games to know this for yourself:
    omega is a rogue-like text-mode monster-slashing spell-casting countryside-trodding quest-seeking game from the end of the last century. It is, arguably, the best of its kind. Where nethack or moria concentrate on monster slashing, omega instead has a much better storyline and interesting quests. Much humor can be found throughout the game, and the character generation sequence is worth reading for its entertainment value alone. The snippet of code about ghosts is from that part of the game. You can download omega from http://www.alcyone.com/max/projects/omega/. Try it, you won't regret it.

  74. Sounds good but... by Houdini91 · · Score: 1

    What if one of these agents refuses to kill itself when ignored? What if it instead keeps cloning itself thousands of times, and becomes even more powerful?

    Where's Neo when you need him...


    - Houdini

  75. Ghosts or Goats? by djeaux · · Score: 1
    A certain preacher became disturbed that his congregation was showing too much interest in the occult. So he decided to preach a sermon against ghosts. At what he thought was the pivotal moment, he asked, "How many of you believe in ghosts?"

    About 3/4s of the people in the church raised their hands. The preacher then asked, "And how many of you have SEEN a ghost?"

    About half the folks raised their hands. This was not going in the direction the preacher intended, so he asked, "And how many of you have SPOKEN to a ghost?" Still about a quarter of the hands were raised, so the preacher bellowed, "And how many of you have had SEX with a ghost?"

    One hand remained up. Billy Bob Six-Pack, the town drunk, had his hand up. The preacher leapt from the pulpit, ran down the aisle & shouted, "Billy Bob! You have had sex with a GHOST?"

    Billy Bob looked up blearily & replied, "Oh. No. I thought you said 'goat'..."

    <UH OH>
    Not THAT guy. (Link intentionally omitted. You know which one ;-)
    </UH OH>

    --
    "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
  76. what is the accent by _Qiang_ · · Score: 0
    It reminds me the .. resident evil


    the voice sounds to me from European ghosts.

    let me hear some American voice!!

  77. museum guides by peter303 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Recent museum guides like at the Dallas Noeller Sculpture Museum use mp3 players with RFID readers. The mp3 gives random access sound loops, so you aren't tied to a sequential audio tape. The RFID tags on art works give you the location index.

  78. Mona Lisa Overdrive by mattnl · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This reminds me of the "guide" that the little girl has in William Gibson's "Mona Lisa Overdrive" .. it was a character that accompanied her everywhere to help her find her way around London.. If they could package these ghosts in portable devices that people could carry it would be essentially the same thing.

    Once again sci-fi predects the future....

    1. Re:Mona Lisa Overdrive by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      And as you recall, he was MORE than a guide - he was a combat program which took down the main bitch of the story.

      Now that I'd like to have in my PDA.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  79. Um, what's wrong with a paper sign? by Stugots · · Score: 1

    Neat technology, but I'm getting a deja-Segaway feeling.

    The cost/benefit between a 3D butler greeting you at the door that communicates with your PDA and whatnot, and a paper sign taped to the wall, is completely out of whack.

    Applicable for some very complex and large social situations, yes. But don't sell your stock in magic markers yet.

  80. Title screen by KlausBreuer · · Score: 1

    What a brilliant idea to use Flash as the title screen. Not only do we all loooove title screens on web pages (they are so very, very *useful*), many users also simply refuse to install Flash.

    Why? Well, the adverts, of course. With the aid of our good friend Mozilla we can tell images to stop cycling or not load from a specific server, but more and more Flash ads are showing up, they cannot be permanently turned off (except through the hosts file) and THEY ARE PISSING ME OFF! (whoops, sorry)

    Let's not talk about non-DSL users waiting for the applet to load...waiting...waiting...whee, what fun is waiting...wait some more...the joys of dialups...

    Grumble grumble.

    OTOH, it's perfectly possible that this wasn't the title screen, but an excellent demo of the system itself (which I find a great idea). In this case, feel free to demod me to China, since I didn't RTFA.

    --
    Free PC version of ChipWits at http://www.breueronline.de/klaus/chipwits/
    1. Re:Title screen by PaleBoy · · Score: 1

      Use Adblock, an extension available for FireFox. Just click the handy tab on the flash ad, and "disappear" it. Or, if it's from an ad server, go ahead and banish the entire server from sending you a flash file ever again. Seriously. It's great.

      --
      ------ What's sadder than realizing you've filtered out your own comments?
  81. Re:Help me out here... Eliza with a fancy flash si by oblivionboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I really find this attitude disappointing, especially since its here on Slashdot. Although everything you say is technically correct, I'm not sure I understand what is the point of dissing an experimental project -- because it is experimental.

    This is not a commercial product. Clippy is. And here is the big difference.

    An experimental project like this is all about moving to the next step. The step where it becomes a reality. If you're dissing this project now, because a CS faculty is conducting a research project (which CS Faculties are supposed to do), which is actually interesting, and has potentially really great possibilities, then I'd hate to see how you expect progress to be made in computers at all.

    Oh maybe you're just upset that it's not a Linux project.

    Either way, I think this is really cool, and I love the evolutionairy aspect of it.

    This is one project, I'll be keeping track of.

  82. Re:DLCA?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    (I'm going AC as we're getting OT.)

    1) the acronym is DELCA, not DLCA, so it's not even close to DMCA

    1. Point taken - I didn't RTFA, but the presence of the "E" in the acronym wasn't obvious from the full name of the product. ("Dis-Embodied"?)

    2) Even if it was DLCA, just because you change a letter in order to crack a poor DMCA joke in your post doesn't make it funny

    2. Fair enough, but this being Slashdot, the oblig. reference to DMCA was coming sooner or later, as fast as you can say "Beowulf cluster of ghosts," or the regular "tinfoil hat/ Soviet Russia" crack.

    As far as "+3" funny goes, well, that just means a single person with mod points thought it was worth a smile, nothing more. /. has low standards for humor at times.

  83. Re:Help me out here... Eliza with a fancy flash si by fingusernames · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Right on. As I just wrote in a previous reply, the underlying technology involved in the interaction appears to be a mix of ELIZA and an Infocom-like adventure game text recognition engine using keywords, like what we wrote as kids in BASIC on our home computers back in the 80s. All the glitz on top, and the tie-in to other systems, appear to be the only real meat of the system. That is, of course, interesting. But the technology is certainly nothing terribly impressive, unless they've hidden the good stuff.

    Larry

  84. A few more Gauntlet-esque phrases... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    Eat your food; don't spill it! (student stumbles in cafeteria)
    Use alcohol to kill brain! (also kegger)
    Freshman now has limited invincibility! (adrenaline rush or intoxication)
    Save credits to open jobs! (registration)
    Pleasure: 100 bucks! (campus prostitute)

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  85. Yes by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    "The students at Copenhagen's new IT University will soon be guided by invisible, but talkative digital agents [...] Ignored ghosts can die out completely. [...] - several papers have been published already."

    Yes, I think I've read one of those papers.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  86. fisting by ircbuddy · · Score: 0

    nt

  87. Re:Ahh, something like Harry Potter's marauders ma by |/|/||| · · Score: 1
    I found that when I was reading the Harry Potter books, I couldn't help imagining how all of the "magic" could really be nothing but "sufficiently advanced technology." A lot of cool stuff in those books could be not too far off - the "living" paintings, for example.

    --
    [javac] 100 errors
  88. I'd rather.. by Polyphemis · · Score: 1

    ...train one to scream randomly. Imagine walking down a hall, minding your own business, and then wet yourself when one the ghost begins shrieking so loud the floor tiles rattle, and then suddenly stops, and doesn't say anything more.

    1. Re:I'd rather.. by Hikahi · · Score: 1

      Ow, i just hurt something laughing.

      --
      Nessun maggior dolore, Che ricordarsi del tempo felice Nella miseria. -Dante
  89. Background noise? by mforbes · · Score: 1

    I don't see anything in the article that addresses this, and it may be something that previous natural-language developers have already hammered out...

    How well do such interpretive systems filter out background noise? Our grey matter performs this trick (usually) without our having to concentrate on it at all-- signal/noise ratio isn't something most people likely think about with oral communications, unless the noise volume at the signal frequency is overwhelming.

    I can just see that hypothetical in the article, but taken to a pretty typical college-campus extreme:

    There are two dozen 1st-year students wandering around in front of the big screen (it's not time to register for classes, so they're all just sort of forming temporary cliques as the trot back & forth). Which student does the ghost select to approach?

    Let's say multiple students are in the same room at the same time, trying to use the same interface to check-- oh, I don't know, call it the inventory of that closet in the article. They're close enough together that they can hear each other, which isn't a problem for humans-- think about the busy cubical farm with dozens of employees simultaneously on the phone. We filter each other out pretty well... but how well does the software handle it?


    Last thought: I can just see giving the system a request it doesn't know how to handle...
    I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that...

    --

    Allegedly real newspaper headline from 1998:
    Man Struck by Lightning Faces Battery Charge

  90. Sounds like the poor loser dorks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Ignored ghosts can die out completely.

    Sounds like the poor loser EECS dorks already trolling around most college campuses.

    1. Re:Sounds like the poor loser dorks... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Well....just don't name one 'Lasher'....that ghost has a way of coming back into the 'real world'...and with serious consequences...

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Sounds like the poor loser dorks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A fan of Anne Rice, I see. :)

  91. You told it wrong by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

    > Oh. No. I thought you said 'goat'...

    Goats, not goat. One letter, big difference in funny factor.

    Imagine if JLP had said "bocoli" instead of "broccoli"? That wouldn't have been funny, either.

    On a similar topic, my youngest daughter used to say "pissghetti" instead of "spaghetti" when I asked her what she wanted for supper. No amount of coaching could get her to change her pronounciation. Until I told her that pissghetti is made with piss.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    1. Re:You told it wrong by djeaux · · Score: 1

      Have you told her what a "spag" is yet? :-D

      --
      "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
  92. Re:I can't wait till some college pranksters hack by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    "Have you stopped touching yourself?"
    "No, I mean, yes!"

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  93. Ambient Intelligence Artificial Intelligence by EarnestChameleon · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I absolutely agree.

    I was able to get to the main paper (at least, I think it was the right one), but the focus seems to be on UI and the disembodiment thereof, not on any of the actual trivialities of interpretation and response. Next to last page has a sentence on the challenges of giving verbal commands to such a system (10 words a minute--not really a conversation).

    And to slip in "personalities" and the genetic algorithm business just muddies the waters.

    There's absolutely nothing in here about AI. I do think the UI stuff--the locality of personalities is interesting, so that might be somewhat original...

    the rest is just so much fluff.

    --

    --Have a good night's sleep. Don't forget to brush your tooth.

  94. computer science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're just pissed that the "S" in "CS" is continually given short shrift. The parent poster is bemoaning the lack of SCIENCE, not the lack of marketability or of linux (where the fuck did you pull this from?)

  95. Gibson reference by iLEZ · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of Colin in William Gibsons Mona Lisa Overdrive. One of the caracters in the book, the little girl Kumiko has a "Ghost",
    or a Construct in a little walkman-sized box. It leads her in the escape from the violent collapse of her fathers business in Asia.
    This idea could be really helpful! I am on my second year in campus and i still feel lost at times.

    --
    You cant fight in here, its a war room!
  96. Re:Help me out here... Eliza with a fancy flash si by Featureless · · Score: 1

    Your prerogative, of course. If you paid close attention you will see that most of my complaints stem from a single deficiency in their presentation - that they led with the fluff, and their real work, if it's on there at all, is somewhat obscured. So it's difficult to evaluate whether this research is interesting or not. I hope you can see, I think their ideas are interesting too. I just can't tell yet if any of their interesting ideas are actually being demonstrated, which is already a bad sign.

    You should consider the importance of skepticism. I think you will find, especially if you spend much time in an academic environment, that not all lines of research, or all researchers, have an equal chance of paying off. Worse, if you humor them all with endlessly open-minded ears, it's you that won't get the progress you expect. For every person doing real work, there are hundreds of others who, whether from lack of ability or desire, just want to phone it in and retire comfortably, or worse, float glitz and hype instead of real results.

    There are plenty of times you must point to something and say, "justify it." It's certainly routine, as well as essential for the health of the academic community, for your colleagues in your field to challenge your presentations criticially rather than close their eyes and embrace you. This is not the liberal arts; this is science. This adverserial system is mirrored across many kinds of human endeavor and has served us very well over the millenia. It's very important in the way we collectively accomplish intellectual tasks.

    I fully hope some advocate for the project will arrive and engage in a debate (a fiesty one, even) - perhaps then we'll learn what, if anything, actually research oriented is happening in this project, or if it is indeed all theater. But you haven't done anything except be hurt on their behalf and toss a few humorous insults. Better you should argue the substance instead.

    By the way, what is the evolutionary aspect of it? I read their teaser about "implicit voting" and Vialence, and they drop the term alife, but are they actually using a genetic algorithm? If so, how does it work?

  97. No way by Animats · · Score: 1
    AI is way too dumb to do this.

    I suspect that if they actually implement this, and it seems to work, there will be people somewhere behind the scenes running it. It won't really be automatic.

    Rather than fooling around with PDA and WiFi crap, the Audio Spotlight technology would be much more effective for ghosts. This has real potential in retail: "The red one is perfect for you".

  98. That's assuming a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    That's assuming the marketing companies program the ghosts that way. They could program them to be MORE aggravating if people ignore them! Look, it's just a matter of changing a bit of program logic....

    Really, the applications for this tech are pretty endless.

  99. Re:Help me out here... Eliza with a fancy flash si by Hast · · Score: 1

    I agree with you in the sense that projects without any real commersial potential can still be a lot of fun and interesting. OTOH this project hasn't come very long.

    While the speech syntesizer and sound effects were quite interesting they are a loooong way away from their goals. They are not even on the experiment stage yet.

  100. What voice synth? by Tesser · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some of the pages have quite impressive voice inflections.

    Does anyone know what they might be using to generate the voices? I poked around for a while but never found anything on what actually creates them.

  101. Re:museum guides by Bish.dk · · Score: 2, Informative

    Also in use in the exhibition of architecture by Daniel Liebeskind at the Jewish Museum in Berlin. Extremely neat. You approach a screen showing a movie, and your headphones synchronize perfectly to the film. Works very well.

  102. Loebner prize... by thrill12 · · Score: 1

    ... if it really is something interesting, it's engine will probably been given a Loebner prize. Other than that, it's just a bunch of flashy marketing talk and some sleek graphics.

    As a comparison just play a cool game on the C64 and tell me why that has to be any worse than the sleekest, most graphically attracting game on the pc with the most boring gameplay.

    It's all about the contents baby.

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
  103. When I walk around campus by serutan · · Score: 1

    I hear dead people.

  104. Re:Ahh, something like Harry Potter's marauders ma by extra88 · · Score: 1

    Indeed, I was thinking of the Marauder's Map as being like a PDA with a map and everyone's tagged with WozNet.

    I also thought there should be more magic that emulates Muggle technology so I was pleased when I came to the Extendible Ears as a magical substitute for various forms of bugging (I was disappointed by Rita in the previous book).

  105. A little green rosetta by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    A little green rosetta, will make the muffin taste betta. A little green rosetta....

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  106. huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we're not Artificial Stupidity - we're the real thing!

  107. Re: Colin by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

    Looks like you were the only one here to remember his name...

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  108. Priceless. by BillX · · Score: 1

    Back at LTHS... I never saw what the sign originally said; I only saw the picture taken afterward. For an entire weekend, passers-by saw:

    A GIANT POON ATE MR. RICHARDS

    --
    Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  109. Text to speech kind of reminded me by bob_calder · · Score: 1

    of the old "Daisy Daisy" recording from sometime around 1960 give or take a few. My Amiga sounded quite as good as well. In fact it still does.

    Of course, they all sound like they have Danish accents in English. Of course, they probably say the machines sound like Swedes in Denmark.

    --
    Any preoccupation with ideas of what is right or wrong in conduct shows an arrested intellectual development. (Wilde)
  110. You nutsack ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hacking != criminal activity

    You've been reading /. for /how/ long?

  111. Technically? by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

    ...no, it's technically not true.

    Feelings are not just any conditioned response to what are normally emotional stimuli. They are an emotional resposes, which are internal, and currently only observable by the subject. It is possible, for instance, to watch a sad movie, and act as though it didn't affect you at all, even though you became very sad, or conversely to say "that movie made me sad," and you do a very convincing job of acting sad, even though you aren't. What's to keep an AI from doing the latter?

    Unfortunately, we can't exactly quantify emotion, so judging that an AI effectively emulates it is as good as we've got so far. Just don't make the mistake of thinking that it's all the same.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  112. well-- time machine anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i guess if anyone say the crappy movie time machine this is perfectly reminicent of that.. i guess that is the museum guide, but still more interactive and purposeful!

  113. Ambient Ghosts by petrus4 · · Score: 1

    I went to the site, had a look, and downloaded an mp3 with recordings of ghost/human interactions. It's quite impressive, but there are a number of glitches...Most notably in the speed of the speech and pronunciation...the ghosts seem to skip the middle segment of certain words. It jumps a bit.

    Of course, bugs are to be expected with any new thing and once they are ironed out, this could be an extremely impressive technology I think...one which I can see employed in a myriad of different applications. I thought the ability of the ghosts to interpret the wording of a user's requests was particularly impressive. Computer speech recognition and comprehension certainly seems to have come a long way. There is still some ground to be covered, but it's getting there.

  114. Pyxling is annoying by madsdyd · · Score: 1

    Actually that is pretty f*cking annoying.

    Whenever we get visitors they can never find their way around. As a consequence, the administration have begun putting signs up that are printed on a printer.

    So much for that.

    Sorry if I sound like some old weiner, but it _is_ annoying. Staff and students can find their way around, but guest trying to locate someone have to look at a large number of pretty offensive "pyxlings", and it does not really help the faculty, when they want to give the impression of some kind of serious work going on here. I have had people been really put off by it.

  115. What The Hell Are You Talking About. by attercoppe · · Score: 1


    Scott McCloud believes that childrens' tendencies to game the system are what inspire new technology and new uses for existing technology.

    Couldn't find any reference to this anywhere on his site.

    Example: When McCloud's kids use KidPix, they co-opt the dynamite-style erase tool to make intersecting concentric circles.

    Circles that are both intersecting and concentric? Wouldn't that make them...let's see...the same circle?!

    Then again, I have never used KidPix. Maybe this "dynamite-style erase tool" has some kind of weird mathematical law-defying abilities...

    --
    Hardware Geeks Do It With The Covers Off!
    1. Re:What The Hell Are You Talking About. by Popageorgio · · Score: 1

      Sorry, the idea is in his books. Two sets of concentric circles, the sets intersecting. Picture two big round targets laid over one another like a Venn Diagram. My apologies for leaving these explanations out of the first post.