Slashdot Mirror


British Chicken-Warmed Nuke

darrellberry writes "During the Cold War, British researchers developed a nuclear landmine, kept operational during cold conditions by packing it full of live chickens. This story has appeared in a few UK media channels this morning. Probably an April Fools', but who knows? The bomb is supposedly on display at the National Archives in Kew, so if you live in London you can go and see for yourselves..." Also a BBC story and an older New Scientist blurb.

195 comments

  1. Not a prank by Space+cowboy · · Score: 5, Informative


    The BBC are running a separate 'this is true, honest' story, detailing other unlikely stories alongside... I like the fact that one of our railways cost more than a trip to the moon.

    Only in the UK...

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Not a prank by Da+Fokka · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Of course they will say it's true. And next to that, also news agencies are fooled by Aprils fools jokes.

      Frankly, I like the joke; even more because there are people (like you, ha ha) that actually fall for it.

    2. Re:Not a prank by isorox · · Score: 5, Funny

      I like the fact that one of our railways cost more than a trip to the moon.

      And takes just as long too

    3. Re:Not a prank by boisepunk · · Score: 0

      What I'm afraid of is that this might become another "parrot" like april fools' past

      --
      main(0)
    4. Re:Not a prank by OECD · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm inclined to believe this one, if only because it seems to bizarre to be fabricated.

      Remember, this is the nation that gave us Supermarionation...

      --
      One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.
    5. Re:Not a prank by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, but they missed out on the story about newspaper editors being banned from reporting the results of school football matches if one team scores substantially higher than another team. In this case the score was 29-0 defeat.

    6. Re:Not a prank by spellraiser · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I just love this quote at the end of that story:

      Tom O'Leary, head of education and interpretation at the National Archives, told the paper: "It does seem like an April Fool but it most certainly is not. The Civil Service does not do jokes."

      Excellent point - I think this pretty much settles the 'April Fool or not' debate for this one.

      Or does it ??

      --
      I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
    7. Re:Not a prank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn you! I looked up what 'supermarionation' meant and hit all these references to the Thunderbirds, freakiest show ever made.

      yuck

    8. Re:Not a prank by exspecto · · Score: 0

      After seeing that show I understand how people could actually be frightened by the Puppet Master movies.

    9. Re:Not a prank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      And takes just as long too
      Not to mention having a similar safety record to space travel.
    10. Re:Not a prank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And takes just as long too

      And just as dangerous.

    11. Re:Not a prank by The_Rift · · Score: 1

      It's true because it was on the local BBC London news last night (31st of March).

      As well as that AFAIK BBC news don't go in for Arpil fools jokes.

    12. Re:Not a prank by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      Pffft. Dude. Choices of Joe90, Stingray, and UFO (YOU CAN _SO_ STILL SEE THE STRINGS!) and you start badmouthing Thunderbirds?

      Not cool dude. Not cool at all.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    13. Re:Not a prank by azzy · · Score: 1

      I remember the bbc 6 o'clock news one year (April 1st) where they reported on the bad harvest of the italian spaghetti crop, with video footage of women picking spaghetti from bushes.

      p.s. Yes, this was an april fools.. not real

    14. Re:Not a prank by Fnkmaster · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think this was Google's April Fool's joke this year. I think the 1 gig email story is more likely true (though the details may be wrong, who knows).

    15. Re:Not a prank by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But it makes no sense. The plutonium 239 alone should be enough to warm to device and keep it operational. If the PU-239 can't keep it warm, then the chickens are as good as refrigerator meat.

    16. Re:Not a prank by zoney_ie · · Score: 1

      Or longer... it's not done yet... the date given is possibly (probably?) optimistic!

      --
      -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
    17. Re:Not a prank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it was Panorama, and it was in 1957, e.g. see here

    18. Re:Not a prank by Chuffpole · · Score: 1

      and some people won't believe you actually got there either.

    19. Re:Not a prank by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

      That story ran in 1957

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    20. Re:Not a prank by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

      Nope, the bbc did not miss that one. It ran 2 days ago.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    21. Re:Not a prank by Dave+Clifton · · Score: 1

      If you think chickens are sinister what about the Pigeon Guided Missile?

    22. Re:Not a prank by Fishstick · · Score: 3, Informative

      > bad harvest of the italian spaghetti crop

      Swiss, and it was a bumper crop, not a "bad harvest"

      it ranks #1 on the Top 100 April Fool's Day Hoaxes of All Time

      #1: The Swiss Spaghetti Harvest
      In 1957 the respected BBC news show Panorama announced that thanks to a very mild winter and the virtual elimination of the dreaded spaghetti weevil, Swiss farmers were enjoying a bumper spaghetti crop. It accompanied this announcement with footage of Swiss peasants pulling strands of spaghetti down from trees. Huge numbers of viewers were taken in, and many called up wanting to know how they could grow their own spaghetti trees. To this question, the BBC diplomatically replied that they should "place a sprig of spaghetti in a tin of tomato sauce and hope for the best." Check out the actual broadcast archived on the BBC's website (You need the RealVideo player installed to see it, and it usually loads very slowly).

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    23. Re:Not a prank by azzy · · Score: 1

      Since reading through the thread, I became aware of the Panorama incident. However in the 80's (I think) this was repeated again, with colour footage, on the 6 o'clock news. Or I am insane. But I am certainly not old enough to remember it from 1957.

    24. Re:Not a prank by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      "Is this a joke?"

      "No, Ma'am. The FBI does not have a sense of humor that we are aware of."

      Best Men In Black quote, you just reminded me of it.

    25. Re:Not a prank by phoenix.bam! · · Score: 1

      Just to point out to other Americans, this is soccer

    26. Re:Not a prank by Craig+Davison · · Score: 1

      But when you build the railway, at least you've got something to show for the money you spent.
      But then, this is slashdot, so I have to hate railways, love cars, and have a hard-on for space travel.

    27. Re:Not a prank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in other news, Microsoft have asked the editors of business newspapers not to report the number of businesses switching over to Linux.

    28. Re:Not a prank by Jman314 · · Score: 1

      I think the mail story is true, but not the 1 gig part. They just said they could store one gig cheaply, not give one gig to everybody.

    29. Re:Not a prank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Soft voice)

      Mind the gap.

      Again, mind the gap.

    30. Re:Not a prank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But it makes no sense. The plutonium 239 alone should be enough to warm to device and keep it operational. If the PU-239 can't keep it warm, then the chickens are as good as refrigerator meat.
      Clearly someone who has little experience in the assembly of thermonuclear weapons. Relatively pure Pu239 (i.e. weapons grade) has very little self heating. In fact, some simple calculations suggest that the self-heating effect of a critical mass of Pu239, is approximately equal to that of a single chicken. Mixed isotope Pu containing 238, 240, 241 (e.g. reactor grade) has a much higher self heating effect, but is useless for thermonuclear weapons.
    31. Re:Not a prank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you check out http://gmail.com today, the site is much more developed than what it was yesterday. They appear to be very serious.

  2. The Times... by REBloomfield · · Score: 2, Informative

    (british broadsheet), is also doing an 'honest guv' type story: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1058550, 00.html

    1. Re:The Times... by tomalpha · · Score: 1

      This does have a semblance of truth about it. The Blue Peacock nuclear landmines are certainly genuine - they were declassified last year.

      The business with the chickens is most likely the same as every other crazy idea - mentioned as a one line "why don't we try ..." in some discussion document. It's certainly no stranger than a lot of other cold-war ideas: Operation Mongoose, using psychics or bugging cats.

  3. Why chickens? by robertarctor · · Score: 0, Funny

    Everyone knows that lawyers and politicians are more effective heat sources.

    --
    "Once a guy stood all day shaking bugs from his hair." A Scanner Darkly, by Philip K. Dick
    1. Re:Why chickens? by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      Everyone knows that lawyers and politicians are more effective heat sources.

      Chickens have warmer blood.

  4. Uh huh. by Jaywalk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Right up there with the spaghetti harvest.

    --
    ===== Murphy's Law is recursive. =====
    1. Re:Uh huh. by Marbleless · · Score: 1

      The BBC has the original broadcast of the Panorama documentary available online (http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/70000/video/_70980_ aprilfool_vi.ram) in the realvideo format. The realvideo player must be installed on your computer in order to view the broadcast.

      The first real (groan) reason I've ever seen for installing real player :)

      --
      --I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken.
    2. Re:Uh huh. by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      I'll have to point my father to that one... he's always believed that the spaghetti harvest was true. He never got to see the entire program because he had to rush my mother to hospital so that I could be "delivered"...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  5. from the chickens-is-there-anything-they're-not... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...good for dept?

    Uhm, yes. They don't make very good boomerangs.

    Or coffee filters. Or baseball gloves. (Although that one would be fun)

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
  6. Not an April Fool! by CaptainBaz · · Score: 5, Funny

    This BBC story says that "Plans to fill a nuclear landmine with chickens to regulate its temperature were considered during the Cold War. Officials at the National Archives say it is coincidence the secret plan was revealed on 1 April."

    I, for one, welcome our nuclear chicken overlords...

    1. Re:Not an April Fool! by boisepunk · · Score: 2, Funny

      is this somewhat like that cs_italy counter-strike map? shoot the chicken and it explodes?

      --
      main(0)
    2. Re:Not an April Fool! by iceborer · · Score: 1

      Don't blame me. I voted for Foghorn Leghorn.

    3. Re:Not an April Fool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .223 vs. squirrel makes a bloody mess. gibbed.

      never shot a chicken with a .223 but I expect it'd have pretty much the same effect.

      hydrostatic shock is no joke.

  7. I can see the ChicFilet commercial now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I feel like chicken tonight....like radioactive chicken tonight....chicken tonight!

    1. Re:I can see the ChicFilet commercial now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You look like chicken tonight honey.

      In other news, back in 1950's England, a freak accident involving one such chicken-powered nuclear landmines resulted in the discovery of chicken tikka masal, which has since become the country's National dish, displacing the once highly-revered fish and chips.

    2. Re:I can see the ChicFilet commercial now... by bitchell · · Score: 1

      At least they would all be cooked properly is nuked in this device. No chance of salmanela (or however you spell it)

    3. Re:I can see the ChicFilet commercial now... by ShawnSJ · · Score: 1

      What about all the vegitarians out there?? Are they going to develop a nuclear "tofu-rkey" or "chick-n" substitute? I think a self warming chicken pot pie would be really handy! Stouffer's Lean Quisine could make a ton of money -- "Now with two proof of purchase get a free geiger counter! send a self addressed stamped envelope....."

      --
      I am in shape... Round is a shape...
    4. Re:I can see the ChicFilet commercial now... by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      I feel like chicken tonight....like radioactive chicken tonight....chicken tonight!

      Eww... you eat the cock?
      And even worse, it's green!!!

  8. Not an April Fool by nick255 · · Score: 1

    Other news sources are quite adament it is not an April fool joke

    Times

    1. Re:Not an April Fool by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Of course, lack of registration makes it hard to see. Try this other site for the real story.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  9. Seed but no air and water? by DaRat · · Score: 1

    So, the chickens have seed to eat, but what about air and water? So, either an okay april fool's joke, or a really stupid plan. :-)

    1. Re:Seed but no air and water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What part of having chickens in a bomb is NOT a stupid plan?

    2. Re:Seed but no air and water? by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      The decaying bodies & ammonia nitrate from the chicken shit would probably still keep it warm.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    3. Re:Seed but no air and water? by Wun+Hung+Lo · · Score: 1

      And even if the blast didn't kill you, you'd be covered in chicken shit and feathers...I'm not sure which would be worse!

    4. Re:Seed but no air and water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is the UK.... ::ducks::

    5. Re:Seed but no air and water? by arb · · Score: 1

      it is the UK.... ::ducks::

      No. They're talking about chickens - not ducks. Doesn't anyone ever read the linked articles anymore?

  10. Yay!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    What is the diffference between April Fool's Day and every other day on Slashdot?

    On April fools day, everyone knows slashdot will be full of useless information. Every other day, the editors aren't aware fo this fact.

  11. Not unusual by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Missing are the brilliant types of engineers who can find an answer to a problem around them without needing a bigger budget and stuff.

    My father worked (among the other 10,000) engineers in Oakridge, TN, during WWII and they frequently packed delicate nulcear instruments in popcorn (dry popped, no salt or butter) simply because it worked well and was easy to dispose of.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  12. Why today? by peterprior · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The civil service has obviously had access to these documents for a while, so why do they have to "announce" these apparently real plans on April 1st and then get all irritable and have to deny repeatedly that its an april fools joke.
    Why didn't they release the story yesterday, or couldn't they have waited until tomorrow?

    1. Re:Why today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no! you've got two coconut halves and you're bagning them together

    2. Re:Why today? by wfberg · · Score: 4, Informative

      The civil service has obviously had access to these documents for a while, so why do they have to "announce" these apparently real plans on April 1st and then get all irritable and have to deny repeatedly that its an april fools joke.
      Why didn't they release the story yesterday, or couldn't they have waited until tomorrow?


      It was on BBC news yesterday.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    3. Re:Why today? by term8or · · Score: 1

      Because they want you to think it's an april fools joke.

      --



      "As a writer / novelist you might want to spellcheck your sig. :) " - AC
  13. Can't take it! by geeber · · Score: 4, Funny

    Must
    Stop
    Reading
    Slashdot
    .
    Until
    .
    .
    Tom orrowwwww......

    1. Re:Can't take it! by Paleomacus · · Score: 1

      I've got to keep checking in case they post any of those groundbreakingly hilarious April Fools RFCs.

    2. Re:Can't take it! by Tenaka+Kahn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's already tomorrow here...

    3. Re:Can't take it! by mwood · · Score: 1

      Funny, it's *never* tomorrow *here*!

  14. April fool or foolish? by BJZQ8 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't think that a terrified flock of irradiated chickens would produce more heat than something like a quantity of Pu-238 or Pu-240, the former of which is quoted as producing 1/2 watt of heat per gram...nor would they be as durable.

    1. Re:April fool or foolish? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because plutonium is quite expensive, quite rare and quite unstable. You wouldn't want to put plutonium anywhere near a nuclear device for fear of premature ejac^H^H^Hxplosions. HAL.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    2. Re:April fool or foolish? by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 1

      I was wondering that myself. If nuclear material is hot enough to run a power plant, why can't it keep itself warm?

      --

      Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    3. Re:April fool or foolish? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      ..because you don't actually want the nuclear reaction to start until you're a 'safe' distance away.

      If your nuclear material is getting hot, run away. Fast.

    4. Re:April fool or foolish? by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 1

      .because you don't actually want the nuclear reaction to start until you're a 'safe' distance away.

      As I recall, the nuclear material can get quite hot and the nuclear reaction can take place under normal conditions (no explosion) so long as the material is keep below the critical density. That's how power plants work. For every particle emitted from a radioactive decay, fewer than one additional decays are induced. But there's still a lot of spontaneous decays followed by a few induced decays. These should all be making heat. I don't know how tightly they packed the nuclear material, or its configuration. But it seems that it should have created a reasonable amount of ambient heat.

      --

      Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    5. Re:April fool or foolish? by out180 · · Score: 1

      What...is the airspeed velocity of an unladen chicken? What do you mean, a Perdue or an irradiated chicken? What.... I don't know..AAAGGHHH KABOOOOMMMM!!!

    6. Re:April fool or foolish? by nizo · · Score: 1

      Maybe the scientists in charge just really hated chickens?

  15. Chickens by KillerHamster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Way off-topic, but who cares, its a holiday...

    "What if we celebrated Valentine's Day with chickens instead of hearts? Then we'd say, 'I love you, with all my chicken.'"
    - Sesame Street

    1. Re:Chickens by mr.capaneus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Most people on slashdot celebrate Valentine's Day by choking the chicken. Does that count?

    2. Re:Chickens by BgJonson79 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's all fun and games 'til Rosey Palms confesses she's pregnant... and it's not yours.

      --

      There are four boxes used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order.

  16. Why did the chicken cross the road ? by Samael_666 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Because the ... *BOOM*

    1. Re:Why did the chicken cross the road ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And for those who don't get it:
      Why did the chicken cross the road?

      Some of the best are in there and if that does not seem enough just google for "why did the chicken cross the road".

      -mj

  17. Landmine? by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Isn't the point of a landmine to explode right under a group of people? Why does it matter if the charge is a nuclear detonation. As long as the people you are trying to nuke are withing a mile of the explosion, you're probably going to get them. Why not just do a remote control or timed device and save yourself all the hassle?

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    1. Re:Landmine? by BenBenBen · · Score: 2, Informative
      "Landmine" is a bit of a misnomer - these devices were designed to be planted in the ground on the plains of Germany, and detonated by remote control if there ever came a time when the Sovs were in control of that area.

      Currently, Israel deploys nuclear landmines and I'd guess they're not alone. Shrub's apparent penchant for tactical nukes would suggest that there's going to be more random nuclear weapons in the future too.

      Personally, I want to see a nuclear Dambuster's bomb, in time for the next world stone skimming contest.

      --
      The Slashdot Paradox: "100% Overrated"
    2. Re:Landmine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article says that it was a remote controlled device. I don't understand your question? They didn't train the chickens to detonate it ;)

    3. Re:Landmine? by Scutter · · Score: 2, Informative

      Read the article.

      The seven-ton weapon, codenamed Blue Peacock, was a state-of-the art munition to be buried on the plains of northern Germany during a British retreat and detonated by remote control or timer to destroy advancing Russian forces in the event of the Third World War.

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    4. Re:Landmine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another question: why would they need to keep a nuclear bomb at a controlled temperature? They're "just" conventional bombs as detonators in a precise geometry so that their implosion will cause the nuclear material to reach critical mass. Conventional explosives do not require chicken heating.

    5. Re:Landmine? by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      In WWII, most remote controls (especially those that would work around nuclear devices) had a range of about 0.5 mile. Not coincidentally, the Polish tested a few of these devices shortly after the war. The project stagnated when the three head scientists stopped showing up for work, and funding was pulled.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  18. (OT -- I think) Does anyone else see... by kclittle · · Score: 5, Funny
    the deep irony of being given 5 moderator points to /. on April 1?

    --
    Generally, bash is superior to python in those environments where python is not installed.
    1. Re:(OT -- I think) Does anyone else see... by fritz1968 · · Score: 2, Funny

      the deep irony of being given 5 moderator points to /. on April 1?

      too bad that we can't get moderator points for the slashdot editors. They would pick their stories a little better. I can see it now:

      Wal-Mart Sells PCs Preloaded With Sun's Linux (Score: +3, informative)
      Book Reviews: The Power of Persuasion (Score: +2, Interesting)
      British Chicken-Warmed Nuke (Score:-1, Bad April fools day joke)
      Your Rights Online: IBM Files For Declaratory Judgement In SCO Case (Score: +5, Excellent!)
      Gates: Hardware, Not Software, Will Be Free (Score: +4, Funny)
      Your Rights Online: PanIP Drops E-commerce Patent Lawsuits (Score: -1, Boring)

      --
      It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.
  19. Keeping It Warm by PRES_00 · · Score: 1

    "The seven-ton weapon, codenamed Blue Peacock"
    " ...burying a flock of chickens with the landmine in order to keep it warm."

    A bunch of chicks keeping a male Peacock warm. Try to get That out of your mind now...

    1. Re:Keeping It Warm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate to point it out, but all peacocks are male... peahens are the female of the species

  20. bah! by dfluke2 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This story is worse than Duke Nukem's Plutonium Pack. ...and what happens when you nuke radioactive chicken $hit?

  21. Nuclear chickens by JosKarith · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hooray for British ingenuity - now we're making our own Chicken a la Kiev, faithful even down to the rad count...

    --
    'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
  22. Cluckzilla by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ah. I always wondered about the origin of Cluckzilla, who ravaged Leeds during the late 1960s.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  23. Uh, Oh! by b12arr0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I smell a PITA protest......

    1. Re:Uh, Oh! by dfluke2 · · Score: 1

      as in, a pita sandwich...with chicken!

    2. Re:Uh, Oh! by Ashe+Tyrael · · Score: 1

      PITA.

      People for the Irradiation of Tasty Animals

      *ducks*

      --
      "How fine you look when dressed in rage."
    3. Re:Uh, Oh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PITA = "People Into Torturing Animals"?

    4. Re:Uh, Oh! by Bigman · · Score: 1
      *ducks*
      No, they where chickens, not ducks.

      I was going to do the 'chicken kiev' joke but someone got there first :o(

      --
      *--BigMan--- Time flies like an arrow.. but personally I prefer a nice glass of wine!
  24. Seymour Cray by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 4, Funny


    Seymour Cray would've used oxen to warm his nuclear landmine.

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    1. Re:Seymour Cray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now he's dead. See how well that did him?

  25. Are you suggesting nuclear bombs migrate? by Himring · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Are you suggesting nuclear bombs migrate?"

    "Not at all. They could be carried...."

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  26. Lovely! by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 5, Funny

    If this were true, I can already imagine Soviet army personel encountering this weapon:

    Soviet private: In the name of Lenin, what's that awful noise?
    Soviet sergeant: It sounds like... Oh no...
    Soviet private: Chickens? A whole bunch of chickens?
    Soviet sergeant: PULL BACK!!! Tell Dmitri to launch all ICBMs! Get me in contact with the Kremlin!
    Soviet private: What? They're going to peck us to death?
    Soviet sergeant: Silence, cappitalist pig! Those anglobastards witll suffer for their foul crime!
    1. Re:Lovely! by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Of course, it ought to have ended:

      Soviet sergeant: Silence, cappitalist pig! Those anglobastards witll suffer for their fowl crime!

      Simon :-)

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    2. Re:Lovely! by bobbabemagnet · · Score: 1

      I think you meant fowl crime.

  27. Re:from the chickens-is-there-anything-they're-not by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    I don't have a link to it, but there was that one bird that got hit by a fastball...

  28. Ob humor by whovian · · Score: 1

    Looks like this is one story that really laid an egg.

    (Unless of course the radiation would make the chickens sterile.)

    --
    To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
  29. I know this is true because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know this is true, of course, because I heard about this already from a friend of a friend who swears he has a friend that worked on this! Ya...

  30. Hi. I'm Troy McClure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi. I'm Troy McClure. You might remember me from such British atomic chicken films as "Night of the Peckus" and "5,000,000 Feathers to Earth".

    Look for these Lord Low Grade productions on an MST3K showing near you. Me? I'm the one who is always hidden by the shadow of Crow T Robot's head.

  31. Not just for warming anymore. by cbiffle · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think everyone's overlooking the very real possibility that these chickens were used for more than just heat.

    Like styrofoam in the H-bomb, this seemingly innocuous packing material (chickens) might be converted to plasma by radiation pressure, thereby dramatically increasing the explosive yield of the device.

    Just wait. I give it 20 years, and we'll see these docs declassified. Of course, then we'll have to worry about rogue states building C-bombs.

    1. Re:Not just for warming anymore. by TechnoVooDooDaddy · · Score: 1

      C-4?

    2. Re:Not just for warming anymore. by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      Yup, what a horrible way to go. Death by chicken.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    3. Re:Not just for warming anymore. by RY · · Score: 1

      Chicken droppings are high in nitrogen. The droppings could add a few extra pounds of explosive power to the land mine. But at 10Kt an added pound or two does not realy matter.

  32. Powered by the sexual energy by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

    of chickens!

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

    1. Re:Powered by the sexual energy by Bigman · · Score: 1

      Would that be a Flesh Gordon Quote?

      --
      *--BigMan--- Time flies like an arrow.. but personally I prefer a nice glass of wine!
    2. Re:Powered by the sexual energy by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

      Yup.

      --

      Eat at Joe's.

  33. Heard of this before. by AlecC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have heard of the nuclear landmines in a non-April 1st context before, so I think the underlying story is probably true. The idea is that there are some bottlenecks which an advancing Soviet force, particularly tanks, would have to pass through (bridges etc). Why send aircraft to bomb them at great risk when you could put the bomb in place at your lesiur. 10kt is not a particularly big nuke, anyway. I don't think the radiation part was intentional - it is the reason the idea got canned. If they had a "clean" bomb, they might still be there.

    It goes along with thinking at the time: they were also training troops go hide as the battlefromt passed over them, the re-emerge to harrass the enemy rear and lines of communication.

    The chickens, however, are probably someone's April Fool addition.

    --
    Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
  34. Trigger Chicken? by Vexler · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the bomb is triggered when one of those chickens lays an egg.

    1. Re:Trigger Chicken? by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 1

      Which goes first, the chicken or the egg?

      --
      Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
  35. it's 15 minutes walk in sunshine by m_dob · · Score: 1

    but my legs have atrophied as an unfortunate side effect of my slashdottery.

  36. Reason WHY its an april fool by mixtape5 · · Score: 2, Informative

    1)chickens are living organisms, how are they to survive while being barried underground? if they put the chickens down they would put them down at the same time as the bomb...and the chickens can survive through the winter?? They should try to survive any day before a winter day

    --
    WoW: Scheod 70 orc warlock on Shadowmoon
  37. Re:Not unusual by dpilot · · Score: 1

    Didn't the local theater owners get upset when workers brought in popcorn for 'disposal' and it glowed in the dark?

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  38. US Landmines by Catmeat · · Score: 4, Interesting
    According to this. The US deployed nuclear landmines (the MADM system) from 1962 until 1986.

    The page also shows a SADM - the nuclear demolition charge intended for use by parachute dropped saboteurs. The SADM's W54 warhead was the smallest and lightest developed by the US and was also used in theDavey Crockett 'nuclear bazooka' and the AIM 26-A nuclear air-to-air missile.

    1. Re:US Landmines by mwood · · Score: 1

      Lordy, now you've set me thinking about those soda-can-sized nuclear demolition charges at the end of _Silent Running_.

    2. Re:US Landmines by Walrus99 · · Score: 1

      So if they had nuclear landmines that weighed only 400 lbs. why did the need one that was 7 tons?? And since nuclear material gives off its own heat, why the chickens?? Must be 4/1/04 (or 1/4/04 for our Euro-friends).

  39. Yeah, right.. :) by DelawareBoy · · Score: 1

    That ranks up there to, "Car Alarms cause more thefts than they prevent".. Sounds right, but isn't. -DB in 2004

  40. Dirty bomb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does all the included chicken poop make this a dirty bomb?

    1. Re:Dirty bomb? by UberLaff · · Score: 1

      Yeah that's a dirty bomb, alright... can you imagine how far a nuclear explosion could throw that chicken crap... I wouldn't be surprised if the US had a little poop shower that day.

  41. Obvious flaws in this... by ChrisPaget · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1) Radioactive material tends to be self-heating. That's why you can run a power station off it.

    2) A solid steel container, buried underground for a week. How do you train a chicken to hold it's breath, and how long can it do so for?

    3) According to the NewScientist article, "If disturbed or damaged, they were primed to explode within 10 seconds". Surely chickens *inside* the thing would disturb it, and set it off?

    However, a quick office poll still reveals 50-50 support for the idea. Whatever happens, half the office will get laughed at tomorrow...:)

    1. Re:Obvious flaws in this... by mwood · · Score: 1

      I think that "disturbed or damaged" means "dug up or pried open." I don't think the chickens are strong enough to do either one.

    2. Re:Obvious flaws in this... by timbos · · Score: 1
      1) Radioactive material tends to be self-heating. That's why you can run a power station off it.

      Radioactive material is only self heating when its above critical mass. Having a bomb go critical is not a good idea if you're trying to keep it hidden :)

      3) According to the NewScientist article, "If disturbed or damaged, they were primed to explode within 10 seconds". Surely chickens *inside* the thing would disturb it, and set it off?

      Good point, I think that the door was booby trapped (see my other post, but there was also a float switch in there, incase the device was underwater and the enemy sent divers down to disarm it.

      Apparently the device that they have (pictured in the BBC article) was stored at an RAF base until fairly recently. When it was delivered to AWE for display, the airforce had rigged the door so that the timer started ticking when it was first opened :D

  42. Atomic Demolition Munitions by Detritus · · Score: 1

    The United States also designed, manufactured and deployed nuclear landmines during the Cold War. See here for some pictures.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  43. Spare the chickens...use a chickent hat! by shiwala · · Score: 1


    Why couldn't they just order a really big chicken hat to fit around the landmine and spare all those innocent chickens?! It looks much warmer than a real chicken anyway!
    And remember: "A fowl is a terrible thing to waste"

  44. This isn't a prank either by gowen · · Score: 2, Funny

    A 1944 design for a pigeon-guided missile, that was to be used to sink German battleships. Until the Navy decided it was a stupid idea.

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  45. Re:Not unusual by wass · · Score: 2, Funny
    Missing are the brilliant types of engineers who can find an answer to a problem around them without needing a bigger budget and stuff.

    I took a grad-level physics-based electromagnetism class last year, and picked up some supplementary E&M books from the library. One of them was from an engineering slant, and actually described the following problem and it's solution.

    Farmers wanted a way to keep pigs warm in the winter. So they estimated the thickness of a layer of fat under the pig's skin, determined permittivities and permeabilities of the fat and the muscle-layers underneath the fat, and solved the boundary conditions of Maxwell's equations in the presence of RF radiation.

    The result was that they effectively made a low-cost 'microwave oven' tuned to the pig's fat layer, which would keep them warm and still be relatively cheap (ie, put the heater in the pen without worrying about walls, etc).

    Kind of cool, but disturbing in a way too.

    --

    make world, not war

  46. Weapon is real, but no chickens by C+A+S+S+I+E+L · · Score: 1
    Probably an April Fools', but who knows?

    Well, Google, for one. The weapon didn't use chickens, but was kept warm by glass fibre, apparently, according to the UK Atomic Weapons Establishment. (PDF).

  47. Swords into Plowshares... by Doches · · Score: 1

    ...Think of the bandwidth you could get with those pigeons, instead!
    (http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/0 3/31/2b224227&mode=thread&tid=126&tid=133&tid=186& tid=95)

  48. What about the clucking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wouldn't the clucking sound give away it's position to the enemy?

  49. Well, there you go... by sczimme · · Score: 1


    Just feed the popcorn to the chickens. Done and done!

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
  50. April 1st is the perfect day to release such info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I were a politician, I'd release potentially embarrassing information on April First, along with as many amazing and unlikely details as possible. Enough people would probably be skeptical to mute the public response. Have a story about burying nuclear landmines in Germany? Just add chickens to the story, and it'll make a brief splash in the humor section before disappearing.

  51. Re:from the chickens-is-there-anything-they're-not by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or baseball gloves. (Although that one would be fun)
    It depends on where you plan putting your hand...

    Then again, you might have a different idea of fun than me.

  52. world hunger by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    1. stuff chickern in nuke
    2. boom
    3. cooked chicken bits
    4. cure world hunger

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  53. The Designer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was obviously designed by German nuclear scientist Otto Hahn.

  54. Who got to clean it off in when spring came? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Eww.

    Nice choice for a Brit: nuke some German town or clean up chicken shit.

  55. This saves a lot of money by wllf · · Score: 2, Funny

    After winning the war using this weapon the Brits would not have to send in much help to the conquered survivors. Hot roasted chicken just falls out of the sky. And it is easy to find in the dark too.

  56. FWIW by arb · · Score: 1
    The New Scientist blurb linked to above has the real story...
    One problem was that the mines might not work in winter if they became too cold, so the army proposed wrapping them in fibreglass pillows.
  57. I was at announcement by Nick_Gunz · · Score: 1

    I was there at the National Archives, yesterday (March 31st), when this new 'discovery' was announced. This story sounds generally plausible (certainly there was a lot of other wacky stuff that happened in this period) but the anouncement was carried off with such a light touch that I honestly don't know if it's a prank or not.

    I can, however, verify one or two things:

    Blue Peacock was -not- on display a the National Archives, as the Slashdot story suggests. There is, in fact, another thermo-nuclear bomb there.

    I have not seen the documentation behind the chickens claim, although plausible looking documents were brandished at the audience. We were told that the discovery was 'too recent' for documents to have been coppied for us in time.

    If this is a prank, several famous and important Cold War and Secret World historians have been taken in. Most of the people I spoke to were utterly convinced that Prof Hennesy was telling the truth.

    The text reported to us was in just the right style to be a genuine document. On the other hand, Prof Hennessy and his team are the world's leading experts in this field, so you'd expect them to get it right.

    I got the impression that this was not a fully fleshed-out plan, but an idea mooted by some engineer which rated a single paragraph in a much longer document.

    If, indeed, this document has been shown around, that would mean that it is almost certainly genuine. As Prof Hennessy pointed out, why would the provide many pages of highly technical writing for such a joke? On the other hand, I have not seen these documents and have not spoken, personally, to anyone who has.

    Either way, hats of to Petter Hennessy and the Secret State reserch team at Queen Mary.

  58. I've nuked a chicken by nightsweat · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...but I don't think I ever chickened a nuke.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  59. Nothing would surprise me... by Bill_Mische · · Score: 1

    ...given that limpet mines originally had fuses made from condoms and aniseed balls.

    --
    Boring Old Fart (40, married, 3 kids...er no...make that 49, married, 3 grown up kids...it's been a long time)
  60. Partly a Hoax, partly true! by timbos · · Score: 5, Informative
    Blue Peacock does/did exist. I have the dubious privilege of having touched the only remaining example, housed in the museum collection at AWE. The other is (and I quote the curator here) `lost'!

    It was a `landmine' designed to be set on a timer to ambush the Soviets as they advanced across Europe. It was based on the Blue Danube device that was the UK's first air-delivered nuclear weapon (essentially, they removed the fins).

    The device had up to an 8-day timer, but could also be set off locally --- either by booby trap, incase it was discovered, or a trigger. Amusingly there was a 10 second delay when you operated the trigger, just time to duck and cover :o) The chickens, though? That's clearly a hoax. Apart from anything else, the device was air and water tight.

    1. Re:Partly a Hoax, partly true! by farzadb82 · · Score: 1
      It was based on the Blue Danube device that was the UK's first air-delivered nuclear weapon (essentially, they removed the fins).

      You mean the predecessor to the Beagle 2 ?

    2. Re:Partly a Hoax, partly true! by timbos · · Score: 1

      I thought that Beagle was solar powered? ;)

  61. The Display by mdielmann · · Score: 1

    Those who go to the display will see the following sign: "I am the one guy in the civil service with a sense of humour."

    Don't ask how I know.

    --
    Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  62. Nukes are warm by LabRat007 · · Score: 1

    Nukes dont need to be kept warm, they generate heat all by themselves.

    --
    "Capital punishment makes the state into a murderer. Imprisonment makes the state into a gay dungeon-master"
    1. Re:Nukes are warm by LabRat007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      oK replying to my own post is kinda lame however.. I had a buddy in the Army that was of all things an MP. His job was to gaurd nuclear shells for long range artierly. Its the middle of winter and the other guards insist on sitting on the crates because they continually emit heat. My buddy opted out beacuse he didnt want glow in the dark cajones.

      --
      "Capital punishment makes the state into a murderer. Imprisonment makes the state into a gay dungeon-master"
  63. Duke Buys the Public Domain. Disney, MS, SCO merge by daddywonka · · Score: 1
    Ibiblio, the host of The Linux Documentation Project. Creative Commons, groklaw, a Sourceforge mirror, tons of linux distro mirrors, and hundreds of great projects, has a great April Fools jokes on the cover.

    It seems that Duke University has bought the Public Domain for $2.2 trillion. In response the Ibiblio director, a University of North Carolina employee, is moving to Duke. Also MS, SC0 and Disney are merging in response to the Duke purchase.

    I thought it was funny...

  64. Got a tour of this thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got a tour of this thing at Aldermaston last November by an old guy that worked on it. I thought it was funny then. (So was the old guy) Chicken powerer nuclear landmines usually are funny though...

  65. priceless by Lighterup · · Score: 1

    1. 10 Sharks with lasers(protection) 1 million 2. 1 nuclear chicken. 2 dollars Faces on the masses when the chicken lays an egg. PRICELESS.

  66. You're MEAN! by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    " UFO (YOU CAN _SO_ STILL SEE THE STRINGS!) "

    awwww, the purple-haired moonbabes are getting all pouty now!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:You're MEAN! by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      Thats all well and good. Just keep the underwater launch crew and their string vests away...

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
  67. Kahn..... by ubugly2 · · Score: 1

    I never realized my browser could read "William Shatner" tags..

  68. Re:from the chickens-is-there-anything-they're-not by GarbanzoBean · · Score: 1

    But if you find one with a pulley in the middle it may come in handy...
    Go Guybrush!

  69. Only in the UK? Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately I don't have a source to cite, but apparently in Ireland our new light rail system in Dublin has cost 600m euro, and the cost of one mars rover was over $300m

    *shrug*

  70. Of course they claim last example is in Russia: by Future+Shock · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cause it gives you: CHICKEN KIEV!!! That, for me, suggests it's a hoax... Future Shock

  71. Gives a whole new meaning to by MajorDick · · Score: 1

    THAW THE CHICKEN, as many of you know from the train story.

  72. new page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either the wayback machine never archived the articles, or theyre both new =)

    http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://news.bbc.co. uk /1/hi/uk/3588465.stm

  73. it had to be done by Ravenrage · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia chicken's nuke you!!!!!
    *uses flame broiled chicken shield*
    ok now i feel better

  74. April 367, 2003 by Tackhead · · Score: 1
    > Other news sources are quite adament it is not an April fool joke

    And how would we know?

    As I pointed out a couple of days ago - read the headlines for the past year. It reads like the Onion on crystal meth.

    SCO claims complete ownership over Linux, charges $699/license.

    Martha Stewart goes to prison!

    Darl McBride calls GPL unconstitutional, petitions Congress for redress.

    California town takes steps to ban styrofoam cups due to environmental concerns about DHMO used in manufacturing process.

    A soft drink flavoured with turkey and gravy, which even its creator admits is undrinkable, has become a surprise hit ahead of the US Thanksgiving holiday.

    What the fuck? We're not celebrating April 1st, 2004, we're celebrating April 367th, 2003.

  75. Gives new meaning to ... by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1

    Flash Fried.

    --
    - Tjp

    I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

  76. the reverse actually happened in New Mexico by intertwingled · · Score: 0

    The reverse situation actually happened in New Mexico. A nuclear device got TOO hot. As part of Project Plowshare, operation "Gasbuggy" was an underground detonation of a nuclear fission device to see if it natural gas would be released from the surrounding rock strata. The test didn't go exactly according to plan. I quote from the web site:

    QUOTE

    After a number of dry runs, a canister containing the bomb and associated hardware was lowered into the 4200' well and the hole cemented shut. Within hours, a water pump at the bottom of the well quit working. This caused an air conditioning system cooling the bomb to flood and stop working. The temperature at the bottom of the well soared to over 200 degrees. Workers abandoned the site because no one, not even the lab scientists knew what might happen to a nuclear bomb drowning in boiling water. All the public knew was that the test was "delayed."

    After several nerve-racking weeks lab employees crept back into the area. After taking some readings they made a decision to try and set the bomb off. Everyone was cleared from the area. Spectators were kept more than five miles back. Holcomb and other managers moved to a command tent for the countdown, the result of which was, at that point, anyone's guess.

    The bomb exploded. Closed circuit television cameras on site recorded a seven foot ground wave--the ground and trees and everything in the vicinity rising and falling like an ocean wave. Two and a half miles away from the blast Holcomb and the others were thrown from their folding metal chairs when the wave hit.

    UNQUOTE

    More information about Operation Gasbuggy can be found here:

    Gasbuggy

    --
    -- SKYKING, SKYKING, DO NOT ANSWER.
  77. Fiberglass Pillows - not chickens...lol by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

    "Hawkings describes their plans for deploying the weapons in the event of an imminent Soviet invasion as "somewhat theatrical". One problem was that the mines might not work in winter if they became too cold, so the army proposed wrapping them in fibreglass pillows.

    In the end, the risk from radioactive fallout would have been "unacceptable", says Hawkings, and hiding nuclear weapons in an allied country was deemed "politically flawed". As a result, the Ministry of Defence cancelled Blue Peacock in February 1958. "
    -- New Scientist 16 July 03

    --

    Lodragan Draoidh
    The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  78. So if we'd ever gone to war... by carcosa30 · · Score: 1

    Would that have made chicken kiev?

    )no offense intended to russian comrades(

    --
    Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
    1. Re:So if we'd ever gone to war... by sparkes · · Score: 1

      or indeed Ukrainian ;-)

  79. funny section? by sharkdba · · Score: 1

    I can't believe they even bother including a funny section on front page today? I mean, how explicit do you have to be???

    --
    The purpose of life is to find the purpose of life.
  80. All but the clucking... by neBelcnU · · Score: 1

    "Keeping Blue Peacock warm involved swathing it in glass fibre pillows. "

    http://www.awe.co.uk/Images/blue_peacock_tcm6-19 92 .pdf

    I hate to ruin a good joke, I was loving every moment of it, too.

  81. Fibreglass==chicken? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hawkings describes their plans for deploying the weapons in the event of an imminent Soviet invasion as "somewhat theatrical". One problem was that the mines might not work in winter if they became too cold, so the army proposed wrapping them in fibreglass pillows.

    I smell an April-fools' winking at something really nasty in the history of the UK. A mine of any kind is a disgusting thing, let alone a nuke-mine.

  82. Yeah... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    It was a dove, 90mph fastball thrown by Randy Johnson, AKA the big unit. E-mail or IM me if you want the video, its all over p2p too.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  83. I think its an April Fools Joke by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 1

    You don't need chickens to heat an atomic device. The decay in the "physics package" will heat the rest of the components. All they needed to do was insulate it well enough; which would surely be easier than stuffing it full of chickens.

  84. "Universal Heat Death Accelerator" by 1iar_parad0x · · Score: 1

    So, essentially they're developing a living inverse-heat engine. You input work and energy and it puts out heat. Up to 90% efficency!

    I'm going to run back to the lab to finish my research on a "Universal Heat Death Accelerator". With this I'll be able to destory the entire universe at once and I'll keep warm in the process (well, as warm as everybody else). I just need to apply for that DARPA grant.

    --
    What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean....
  85. Re:In Soviet Burger King ... by MoFoQ · · Score: 0, Troll

    wtf.

  86. Re:In Soviet Burger King ... by MoFoQ · · Score: 0, Troll

    wtf again...more like Offtopic than anything else.