Slashdot Mirror


Ontario Schools License StarOffice

An anonymous reader writes "Sun Microsystems has signed a contract with the Ontario Ministry of Education in one of the biggest deals yet for its StarOffice software. It covers 72 public and parochial school boards in Ontario. All will be licensed to use StarOffice 7 on all school-owned PCs. Financial details weren't disclosed but Ontario school officials said the cost is 'minimal.'" Reader Apostata adds that the move "will see the application suite used by 2.5 million students. No word on whether it ships with 'Canadian English' pack ;)"

536 comments

  1. Backstory by mfh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think this move is the most enlightened move the Ministry of Ed has made since inception. Sadly it's only motivated by the shoddy budget for education, and not a move in ideology, necessarily. The backstory to the Ontario Ministry of Education using Star Office has to do mostly with politics. Even with $2bil increase to spending on education in the 2004 budget, this is still a lot less than years prior, due to Tory cuts to education. It's really a sad state of affairs for children today, in Ontario.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Backstory by Orgazmus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In our school(Norway), we have about 60pc's running licenced versions of WinXP, while we're out of everything else :\
      Its sad..

      --
      The system had the verbosity of HTML combined with all the readability of compiled assembly viewed as bitmap images
    2. Re:Backstory by fembots · · Score: 5, Funny

      Does that mean that the best way to lobby for OpenSource is to lobby for cutting funding in education?

      The ministry probably can't even get StarOffice if the budget is cut to $500mil, maybe then they'll start considering OpenOffice :)

    3. Re:Backstory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Unfortunatly the problem (at least in California) is the teachers union. What percentage of increase in spending actually to directly educating the children, I.E new equipment, new texts, new schools. Hardly 25%. Most goes to Teachers salaries, administration salaries et al. Now there is no problem with paying teachers and administrators more money, but don't you think they should do a better job to earn it?

      Flamebait or no, time and time again socialism and liberalism is proven to be the most inefficient form of government.

      spelling and grammer errors brought to you by California's finest public education.

    4. Re:Backstory by monkeyneck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "spelling and grammer errors brought to you by California's finest public education" Make that: spelling and grammar errors brought to you by someone who'd rather blame the system than learn some shit on his/her own.

    5. Re:Backstory by neilcSD · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It doesn't matter what the motivation is. They could have switched from Microsoft because little green men from Mars made them. The bottom line is, the sooner we can de-indoctrinate (is that a word?) people from Microsoft products, and in greater amounts, the sooner they will go away.

    6. Re:Backstory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      I was in high school and university in Ontario during the Tory regime. They are the best thing that even happened to public education in Ontario. The amount of corruption and waste that was left behind by the NDP was grotesque, the Tories were just cleaning that up.

      There was insane waste in IT budget; we had teachers take school computers home for personal use and only bring them back when something better was bought so they'd take the better one and return the obsolete one. We had textbook shortages that the teachers would solve by photocopying class sets of textbooks every year, at a much higher cost than just buying books would be.

      Cutting the budget forces the corruption to shrink so it doesn't get discovered.

      The last I heard though, they still had to buy things from blessed companies that charged 3 times as much.

    7. Re:Backstory by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

      Regardless of the reason, I'm much happier with my tax dollars staying away from MS.

    8. Re:Backstory by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "The bottom line is, the sooner we can de-indoctrinate (is that a word?) people from Microsoft products, and in greater amounts, the sooner they will go away."

      Oh brother. So your motivation is "destroy Microsoft"? You just hate them, so be gone with them? +5 Insightful?

      Look, I'm not exactly in love with Microsoft here, but the reason that they're in this monopoly in the first place is they have made a VERY useful app. Spare me the "Oh they made a monopoly out of nothing and then put a gun to millions of people's heads" theories, as long as people are complaining that the alternatives are missing features then the Microsoft 'doctrine' is going to remain quite strong.

      It's cool that somebody took a leap and started using Open Office, but man, don't turn this into a "ding dong MS is dead" pitchfork party.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    9. Re:Backstory by benjj · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't know about Canada, but here in the UK we have major problems with teacher recruitment and retention. The argument for teacher pay rises comes not from socialism but simple free market economics. If people are not paid enough then they will go and do something else instead. And at the moment, in teaching, plenty of people do.

    10. Re:Backstory by Moonpie+Madness · · Score: 1

      "It's really a sad state of affairs for children today, in Ontario" I always thought canada had great schools, that's is too bad... anyway, money is not everything by any means, its all about high standards and time. private schools dont spend as much as publics in the US, they just kick out all the jerks... But towards the topic, why not send openoffice to public schools that are notoriously poor? Just send it in to Mississippi High, and they may realize they have no choice but to use it...

    11. Re:Backstory by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They still have too much too much money if they license StarOffice, instead of just installing OpenOffice for free.

    12. Re:Backstory by wolftone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd love to say an anti-socialist system works any better. Here in the public schools of Seattle, teachers are paid peanuts, textbooks still refer to the Soviet Union as current politics, the buildings are poorly maintained (in favor of a current rebuilding/remodelling phase which was thirty years overdue), the boys' bathrooms don't have paper towels or doors to the stalls, but (almost) every classroom has at least one nice and shiny Dell with WinXP.

      Now there is no problem with paying teachers and administrators more money, but don't you think they should do a better job to earn it?

      Sure. But cut their classes in half (from an average of thirty students to an average of fifteen) before judging their teaching ability.

    13. Re:Backstory by tftp · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Spare me the "Oh they made a monopoly out of nothing and then put a gun to millions of people's heads" theories

      I'd use a different analogy: "MS gave users enough of their drugs so that the users are addicted now, and can't withdraw even when they are ravaged by some virus every other day."

      There is nothing wrong in curing a drug addict (assuming that it is possible.) Similarly, there is nothing wrong in weaning the users from the MS alcohol, even though it tastes great.

    14. Re:Backstory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The sooner we can de-indoctrinate people from Microsoft products the sooner they will go away.
      The word you seek is deprogram. Often cult members require assistance before rejoining society.
    15. Re:Backstory by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Insightful
      but the reason that they're in this monopoly in the first place is they have made a VERY useful app.

      Many, myself among them, would say that it's more to do with bundling and intimidation of OEMs who offered alternatives. Certainly MS Office does the job, but given an hour to get used to it, WordPerfect's suite, IBM's SmartSuite, or several other lesser-known ones would satisfy the vast majority of users. If you've ever been in a real office and watched people using it, most never stray from: enter text, style by clicking on the formatting bar, print/save/send.

    16. Re:Backstory by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I don't support the "destroy Microsoft" line, but creating a genuine choice based on open standards would be a very good thing.

      The problem I can see for Microsoft is that once something like Open/Star Office reaches a certain point (say 20%), Microsoft could get into deep trouble. At that point, everyone will know someone who uses Star/Open Office.

      The biggest challenge for Open Office isn't quality of product. It's awareness and confidence.

    17. Re:Backstory by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      A lot of people are taking the government's money to do train (presumably BEds) and then doing something else!

    18. Re:Backstory by nathanh · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Look, I'm not exactly in love with Microsoft here, but the reason that they're in this monopoly in the first place is they have made a VERY useful app. Spare me the "Oh they made a monopoly out of nothing and then put a gun to millions of people's heads" theories, as long as people are complaining that the alternatives are missing features then the Microsoft 'doctrine' is going to remain quite strong.

      I'm no lover of Microsoft either but there's no denying that some of their products are quite good. Microsoft haters need to realise that Microsoft makes stuff that is "good enough". It isn't always the best but similarly it isn't always the worst.

      Of course, this "good enough" mentality in customers is what will destroy Microsoft. Free software like Linux is also "good enough". So Microsoft might invest considerable effort to make their products better but the vast majority of customers just won't care. Superior quality didn't save Microsoft's competitors in the 80s and 90s and it won't save Microsoft now.

      However, I will make a point that Microsoft got this large mostly through luck. They owned the popular OS which ran on the hardware platform that grew from the expected run of several 1000 IBM units to several 100 million cloned units worldwide. That success could have just as equally gone to Apple if the Apple II was a clonable platform, or to Digital Research if the Kildalls hadn't balked at IBM's NDA. Mr Gates was in the right place at the right time and knew someone willing to sell him the right product. You might call that "business genius" but honestly I think Gates isn't that smart. He might have had some inkling the deal with IBM was "important" but I doubt he realised it was worth tens of billions.

    19. Re:Backstory by kubrick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      . Spare me the "Oh they made a monopoly out of nothing and then put a gun to millions of people's heads" theories

      don't turn this into a "ding dong MS is dead" pitchfork party

      I didn't see either of these statements in the post you were replying to. Nice collection of strawmen you have there -- are they made from official astroturf?

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    20. Re:Backstory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut up man. M1crosoft is cool. They make great keyboards, games and office apps. Thier 2k OS is nice too, and a lot faster than most alternatives.

    21. Re:Backstory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the move is stupid. I'm a Sun guy, but even I don't like StarOffice or OpenOffice. Try opening a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet with workbooks or formulas or locked data in it. Try opening the Hacker's Diet spreadsheets into it. They bomb. What good is an office suite if you can't access documents created by the other 98% of the world?

    22. Re:Backstory by rikkards · · Score: 1

      Canada does have great schools. The funding is a tad tight (ok that is an understatement).

      I spent 5 years in the states from grade 7 through grade 11. The biggest difference people see is that in Ontario at least we don't have as many sports teams (or facilities for it). We may have a football, baseball, hockey and track teams but the school I went to (mind you it was an upper middle class school) also had tennis, golf plus the US has the Junior as well as Varsity teams.

      Mind you the population of my high school in Canada was less than half of what it was in the US.

    23. Re:Backstory by rikkards · · Score: 1

      The funding here has got pretty bad. I have heard of classes where kids will bring in lots of pencils and pens and the teacher will pool all of them and spread them among the other kids.
      Now this is a friend of a friend heard this. If it is true I don't know.
      Can anyone verify?

      If it is true it is pretty sad

    24. Re:Backstory by wolftone · · Score: 1

      where is 'here'? i remember the teachers having to stock paper and pencils on their own because the school would run out long before reordering. the money just wasn't there.

    25. Re:Backstory by Trent05 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why should Windows users be "cured". It's an operating system that is easy to use, is widely supported and easy to support. I have a Red Hat 9 box that runs like a champ but can be a pain in the butt sometimes and I'd hate like hell to support it over the phone to family. I haven't had a virus since ?Elvira? back in 94 or 95, and that's though using various Windows boxes from 88' to present.
      I'd LOVE to see Linux become mainstream, but it still ain't there yet. It's a differnt OS for a different purpose/user.
      Just my .02

      --


      --
      The Marines: The few, the proud, the not very bright. - Slashdot tagline 04/21/05
    26. Re:Backstory by christophersaul · · Score: 4, Insightful

      StarOffice comes out in regular, supported editions, much easier than managing a large deployment of various OpenOffice versions with noone to fall back on for advice.

    27. Re:Backstory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ladies and gentlemen, you have NO idea how much money is being wasted in Ontario schools.
      For example, if you want some eye openers, investigate something called 'CTMI' (Classroom Technology Migration Initiative)by the Toronto District School Board (one of the largest in North America). It's a M$ based system of sending out images of M$ software to schools while the computers are left on all night in vacant buildings...(the 'migration', BTW, is from things like Windows NT to Windows 2000, etc.) the millions being wasted on licences and electricity alone boggle the mind...(incidentally, I have steadfastly refused to become involved in this boondoggle, running a linux lab for the past couple of years as an example of leadership, possibilities, alternatives, etc....wish me luck!)
      P.S. (the linux lab has a record of 100% uptime for the past two years, no software costs, etc. compared to the continuous reimaging of windows machines,.. well, you guys all know the drill ;-)

    28. Re:Backstory by kiwaiti · · Score: 3, Insightful
      In many cases, MS Office is bought because users are assumed to be more familiar with it than with alternatives, not because it has any cool features alternatives would lack.

      Give millions of students a chance to take their first steps in Open/Star Office, and alternatives to MS may seem more viable as a choice for large office environments, where user confusion is a major cost threat.

      Kiwaiti

      --
      Member of the Legion Of Microsoft Haters
    29. Re:Backstory by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Actually linux is much easier to support over the phone. Why? Because the error messages are descriptive, when you know what's wrong its much easier to fix it.. You don't need to spend an hour doing trial and error to work out what the problem is before you can even attempt to fix it.
      I have done phone support for family members on linux, windows, irix and macos and found windows and macos to be the hardest to phone support due to the uninformative error messages and in the case of windows, the illogical locations of things (shutdown under a menu called start?)

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    30. Re:Backstory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't like Socialism? Don't like unions? Troll!

      Do you mods have any clue what teacher salaries are like in California? How about what public education is like there? Didn't think so.

      I mean seriously, what the fuck? Is this what Slashdot has become? Fucking Socialists.

    31. Re:Backstory by Herschel+Cohen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      RE "...can't access documents created by the other 98% of the world?"

      if formats were open it would not be an issue. The closed formats are to retain a monopoly. Moreover, if a competing office software gained even 20% share you might see those <b><i>glorious</i></b> documents in other formats.

    32. Re:Backstory by BlackSol · · Score: 1

      Sadly the Ontario Ministry of Education has long been underfunded and has looked to alternative software packages. Things like Unisys Icons and other software packages created at the university of Waterloo are common is Ontario schools.

      --
      $sig=$1 if($brain =~ /idea\s+(.*)/i);
    33. Re:Backstory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have any clue what programmers are paid over there? WHAT'S YOUR POINT? The cost of living is very high, thanks to your free market. Think about this.

    34. Re:Backstory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the Ontario school board is switching from WordPerfect, not MS.

    35. Re:Backstory by Daengbo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What's really sad about this is that normally it's not the case. The K12LTSP mailing list is full of members pitching a thin client system to underfunded districts, saying that they can reuse all the machines currently in the school and accept donations from parents, while spending a relatively small sum on a couple of high quality servers.

      The overwhelming majority choose to totally upgrade their IT structure on MS's timetable while slashing teaching positions, instead.

      Some people don't have their priorities straight.

    36. Re:Backstory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, there's no problem retaining teachers in Ontario. They are vastly overpaid and have a good union. Seems that the province can never get more than a 2 year contract with the teachers. Sometimes its just a one year contract! So, every year (or other year) there's the work slowdowns and threatend stikes to contend with.

      And of course now that we have that lying idiot for a Premier, there's "lots more money for education" which, contrary to the stated goal of smaller class sizes, will end up as ammunition for the teachers to demand even more money this year.

    37. Re:Backstory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, you're an idiot. take a step back and read what you just wrote over and over until you agree. there is still hope for you, you could go far.

    38. Re:Backstory by |<amikaze · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because the error messages are descriptive,

      Segmentation Fault.

    39. Re:Backstory by Ubergrendle · · Score: 5, Informative

      Teaching in Ontario is considered a cushy, fat paying government job by most of this province's citizens. You're guaranteed 3 months+ per year of time off; there's "Professional Activity Days" where training comes during the school year for teachers, adding up to 5-10 days during the school year where students have 'days off'. This is infuriating as this training does not come during the 3 months paid leave in the summers, but during the children's learning curriculum.

      The Ontario Teacher's Union is one of the most powerful unions in the country. Its almost impossible to be fire from the OTU. They're extremely active politically, and have been able to resist most modernisation efforts including: a) regular performance reviews of teachers, b) part time/replacement help, and c) mandatory training and skills progression. Sick days are essentially vacation days...you can accrue them gradually over your career and cash them in for $ or early retirement w/ full pay. I've seen teachers retire after 25 years service with almost a full school year off.

      The OTU's indexed pension is LEGENDARY. Last I read it was considered the 2nd best pension in Canada, next to retired Ministers of Parliament. In some odd circumstances some teachers have found their salaries INCREASE upon retirement.

      I suspect it is nigh-impossible to find a better location than Ontario to teach in North America. I seriously considered teaching for a long period of time, but ultimately rejected the career choice due to the personal stagnation that would be inflicted upon me by the union rules.

      PS I know of several PhD professors from UofT who retired from the university to become high school teachers -- equivalent pay, better benefits, fewer hours. Only detriment was less notoriety.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    40. Re:Backstory by incom · · Score: 1

      In ontario anyway, there are plenty of excess teachers.

      --
      True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
    41. Re:Backstory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1. Oh brother. So your motivation is "destroy Microsoft"? You just hate them, so be gone with them? +5 Insightful?

      Hate has nothing to do with it. It's practical; I've spent a couple days getting a Windows XP laptop secured and it's a pain. Unless you use only software that doesn't require admin access, you're in trouble. Most people won't do that.

      Unix-style systems -- through many years of mistakes -- have been updated so that the problems with Windows don't happen.

      Microsoft isn't helping here. They refuse to put in proper controls. No password and defaults to administrator when adding accounts? If Microsoft would PLEASE STOP THIS AND OTHER EVEN MORE INSANE PRACTICES and DO IT RIGHT we wouldn't complain as much!

      So, it would be better if people stopped using Windows till Microsoft corrects these problems.

    42. Re:Backstory by ispeters · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna hafta call bullshit. I was raised in the Peel Board, which is one of the biggest boards of education in Ontario. I'm pretty sure the board used whatever the hell was in the rummage pile the day they went shopping for software. I've used Claris Works, Microsoft Works, Microsoft Office, WordPerfect, and a whole pile of other crap, depending on the year. Probably the Ontario Ministry has hit the next crest in its upgrade cycle and StarOffice was the cheapest, with the most features, or something. The last thing on anyone's mind was what students are most likely to be comfortable with.

      Ian

    43. Re:Backstory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This must be FUD: If you were a Sun guy you would have sent a bug to the implementation team.

    44. Re:Backstory by kiwaiti · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Schools don't care what their students are used to, nor should they. They're there to learn, after all.

      I was talking about the companies these students will one day be working for. Imagine you are to buy something to allow basic word processing. If 80% of your workforce know MSWord, while 20% have never really used a computer at all, it's obviously easier in terms of training to buy what most know than to retrain them all. That's what people accuse Star Office of - not being MS.

      If students familiarize themselves with Star Office rather than MS Office, not choosing MS Office will make more business sense in a few years.

      Kiwaiti

      --
      Member of the Legion Of Microsoft Haters
    45. Re:Backstory by Qwavel · · Score: 1

      Some of what you said is true, some isn't, but here's something we can all probably agree on. Nobody has it better here in Ontario than the doctors (my wife is a GP).

      Their union is much smaller than the teachers, but just as powerful. The last gov't to take on the OMA was the NDP and they got thrashed. The Tories just did everything the OMA wanted.

      The organization most affected by the recent ruling against the National Citizens Coalition is not the NCC itself, it is the CMA which outspends everyone on advertising.

      The doctors have guaranteed lifetime employment no matter how good or bad they are at their job. They can do outrageous things and still not lose their license (details of proceeding against doctors can be seen on the OMA website).

      They can work as little or as much as they want, unless you work on salary for a hospital, and they get paid many multiples of what teachers get.

      Recently my wife got an offer in the mail from the organization that arranges housecalls in Ontario. It was offering her as little/much work as she wanted. She would get a driver, and get paid $200/hour net. So, even the worst doctor in the province (no, I'm not referring to my wife) can make $200 an hour, right out of school, whenever and however much they feel like it.

      I think I'll quit my job as a software developer and become her driver.

      And you want to rag on the teachers!

    46. Re:Backstory by timeOday · · Score: 1
      I agree, the goal needn't be to destroy Microsoft, just to get Linux up to about 20%. That would really improve Linux, because then more hardware manufacturers would start releasing drivers (or at least specs).

      I also wouldn't mind if Microsoft were forced to release its file format specifications (.doc, .xls etc). Let's open up the playing field to some more competition.

    47. Re:Backstory by j-beda · · Score: 1

      Doctors may get paid quite a bit in Ontario (and elsewhere) but there is still a big shortage of them. They also get no employment insurance (maybe not a problem with the great demand), but that also leaves them without maternity/paternity leave. Unless saleried at a hospital, the vast majority of doctors are independant businesspeople who have to pay for staff and office space and insurance and supplies and all of that fun stuff. As any independant self-employed person can do, they can work as little or as much as they want - but for most other professions, taking a week off does not dramatically effect your customers - they can easily call another plumber - with the shrtage of doctors in most communities that is much less of an option. Medical school also is not cheap.

    48. Re:Backstory by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      I remember when I worked tech support for an ISP in 95-96. Internet explorer's error messages would ALWAYS BLAME THE ISP for any problems. For example, if you forgot to dial your internet connection, but tried to use IE to connect to your website, IE would give an error message saying that there was a problem with your ISP that was causing the problem. We'd get calls every day from people whose only problem is that they didn't dial in. Why didn't they check their connection? IE told them it was our fault.

    49. Re:Backstory by rikkards · · Score: 1

      Sorry, forgot to put that in.
      I meant Ontario

    50. Re:Backstory by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      I think there's a difference between trying to destroy microsoft and trying to get people to understand that there _is_ life outside of Microsoft. Microsoft is like an addiction to alcohol. Alcohol isn't evil, it's the addiction.

    51. Re:Backstory by j-beda · · Score: 1
      PS I know of several PhD professors from UofT who retired from the university to become high school teachers -- equivalent pay, better benefits, fewer hours. Only detriment was less notoriety.

      Well, having done a lot of teaching at the university level, I will attest that a typical professor's teaching load is SIGNIFICANTLY less than that of an elementary or high school teacher. Two or three univeristy classes combined take up at MOST 12 contact hours per week. The Ontario university schedule is typically about 13 weeks per term, 26 for the year. An elementary school class meets for at least 5 contact hours per day, with a minimum of 195 school days according to the ministry. That gives 312 hours of contact versus 975 hours.

      I also note that locally at least (Peterborough region), there seemed to me many more proffs listed in the paper as earning more that $100,000 than school teachers last year (puplic employees earning above $100,000 are disclosed on a yearly basis in Ontario under some legal requirement).

      Anyone entering the teaching profession without a true enjoyment of the work and working conditions is doomed for early burn-out. If it was such a "cushy" job we probably would not have as big of a problem as we have with teacher retention.

    52. Re:Backstory by saforrest · · Score: 1

      Oh, there's no problem retaining teachers in Ontario. They are vastly overpaid and have a good union. Seems that the province can never get more than a 2 year contract with the teachers. Sometimes its just a one year contract! So, every year (or other year) there's the work slowdowns and threatend stikes to contend with.

      May I hazard a guess that you voted Tory last fall? :)

    53. Re:Backstory by djgallaw · · Score: 1

      FYI the Ministry of Ed is not directly involved in the negotiations for software. There is a committee composed of teachers and other education professionals called OSAPAC that does this. They have a smallish budget (a few million CAD?) considering they are buying software for all schools in Ontario.

      Licensing Star Office has more to do with the low cost (only a few thousand dollars) and the inclusion of take home rights for students AND teachers than it does politics.

      OSAPAC has also licensed MS Publisher for next year. http://www.osapac.org/negotiations.asp

    54. Re:Backstory by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "Teaching in Ontario is considered a cushy, fat paying government job by most of this province's citizens. You're guaranteed 3 months+ per year of time off..."

      And how exactly is this different from being a Member of Parliament?

    55. Re:Backstory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, because it is a teacher's job to teach, while it is only a portion of a University professor's job. A professor must research, publish, attend conferences, be involved comittees and task forces. They must find their own project funding, manage and direct their graduate students, etc. etc. etc.

      The jobs are not comparable in the least.

    56. Re:Backstory by darilon · · Score: 1
      Anyone entering the teaching profession without a true enjoyment of the work and working conditions is doomed for early burn-out. If it was such a "cushy" job we probably would not have as big of a problem as we have with teacher retention.

      Starting with the OT stuff, and getting to some on topic comments towards the end of the rant.....

      Amen to that. Yes, teachers do get almost 3 months a year of vacation time (technically unpayed, although in some jurisdictions you get that pay spread out over the whole year). While the work day goes officially from 8:30 to 3:30, that only counts contact time. It does not count prep time (creating all those handouts, lessons, planning field trips, etc), marking, coaching (where I work, this is done on a strictly volunteer basis, but 80% of the teachers 'volunteer' as they see it as part of their obligation), preparing graduation commencement, and any of hundreds of other activities.

      Basically a teacher's work load comes down to a minimum of 50+ hours a week if you are doing it properly. I don't know about Ontario, but I know in BC superivsion of teaching is provided by principals at the school level and disctrict admin at the district level. Teacher evaluations are mandatory every 5 years with a growth plan required. Disciplinary actions are not terribly consistent, however, with some teachers being harshly treated for minor infractions and others often ignored for bad practice - but sadly this is the nature of humanity, there will never be a perfect system.

      As far as pay is concerned, things aren't bad. A teacher can support their family for the most part, but not terribly well. There is little room for advancement. The work load can be tremendous, especially in times of education funding cuts. I don't know about Ontario, but in BC you can't bank your sick days to use for holidays, you can only use em if you are sick, and you can't use them to retire early. The pension plan is decent, however, you do pay a significant chunk of your pay into that plan. Frankly, most teachers should not plan to teach much longer than 25-30 years, as they'd burn out very quickly. When I graduated from University, the statistic was that teachers lived on average 5 years past their retirement date.

      Now back to our real topic - Star Office in schools. While this is a good thing, I think OO is a better choice. It's cheaper, there is ready assistance available for tech support on the net, IRC, Usenet, etc. I have my students compare office suites side by side - MS Office, OO, KOffice (the last two using an LTSP boot) and they can't see any significant difference.

    57. Re:Backstory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see, explain to me why when using word the other day how useful it was to me when I lost an hours worth of work when it bombed? Yeah, I backup regularly, but once an hour should be enough. So, again tell me how useful their software is when I lose time and money when their apps bomb!

    58. Re:Backstory by CelloJake · · Score: 1

      Why should Windows users be "cured"?

      To slow down this.

    59. Re:Backstory by Seek_1 · · Score: 1

      Teachers have to show up to work. MPs don't!

    60. Re:Backstory by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "So, again tell me how useful their software is when I lose time and money when their apps bomb!"

      If it's bombing for you, don't use it. What do you want me to tell you? If I had the same experience, I wouldn't use it either. Fortunately for me, though, I haven't had that sort of trouble.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    61. Re:Backstory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft is big because Bill Gates is a very smart man, and more importantly surrounds himself with very smart people. You may call Balmer an idiot, and his little monkey dance does little to dispel this, but he's not an idiot. Now, he's no Hawkings, or Einstein, or Insert Extremely intelligent person here, no. He's the kind of person who is smart enough to recognize the Hawkings' and the Einsteins, and hire them. Back in the day, a company was selling software for computerized road planning or something like that. In the first year, it made $20,000. People stopped buying that software when they found out the company president was 14 year old Bill Gates. Don't ever for a minute doubt the intelligence of the Microsoft Collective. Just be glad that people just as smart, if not smarter, are working outside of Microsoft to create quality software such as Linux, BSD and the many applications many of us use every day.

    62. Re:Backstory by Leon_Trotsky · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Whoa! Looks like someone voted for Harris...

      Holy sheit dude. I'd like to see you survive 5 minutes in a room full of homicidal/suicidal/hormonal maniacs.

      I know I couldn't do it, but if I did - I would want to be damn well paid for it!!!

      --
      Ohhh! Pay Dirt! A pair of half-eaten choco-pants!
    63. Re:Backstory by cmacb · · Score: 1

      However, I will make a point that Microsoft got this large mostly through luck. They owned the popular OS which ran on the hardware platform that grew from the expected run of several 1000 IBM units to several 100 million cloned units worldwide. That success could have just as equally gone to Apple if the Apple II was a clonable platform, or to Digital Research if the Kildalls hadn't balked at IBM's NDA. Mr Gates was in the right place at the right time and knew someone willing to sell him the right product. You might call that "business genius" but honestly I think Gates isn't that smart. He might have had some inkling the deal with IBM was "important" but I doubt he realised it was worth tens of billions.

      I've always thought this too. And even though Microsoft hires some very smart people, large strategic decisions are only made at the top. I've known personally a few, and read of many very bright creative people who could only stand a few years at Microsoft, and with the money they were being paid, could afford to "retire" after only a few years.

      Regarding the "good enough" mentality though, I think the first thing that will be destroyed will be those companies and institutions that rely on that mentality. The federal government does think this way to a large extent and look at all the articles you can find on their budgets being out of control. I don't mean out of control as in large (of course they are that too) but out of control as in nobody knows where the money is or what it was spent on. The federal government should be a case study on how NOT to do data processing. Is it a coincidence that they are the worlds biggest suckers for MS products? Where I worked if you mentioned alternatives to Microsoft you could be essentially fired. Mentioning major flaws in the design of in-house systems would lead to the same results. The feds will be Microsoft's last big customer. Private companies live and die by Darwinian rules. Failure to get your DP right can and does result in failure of the entire enterprise. I think it is here that the trend away from Microsoft will start, and only after it is well under way will government institutions, which aren't allowed to die a natural death will, as they have before, play copy-cat and accept the alternatives being talked about in business journals and conferences. I look at school systems and bureaucracies in the same way. They don't go out of business when they screw up. Only very cash strapped school systems and libraries etc are willing to think out of the box on DP issues. The success stories here will be very helpful, but then Microsoft will thwart these by donating "free" software here and there to libraries, school systems etc. that might otherwise take the Open Source route.

      Open source success will build slowly (much more slowly than most slashdotters would like) in three areas: technically oriented individuals who can't stand the constraints placed on them by closed source products, businesses who want to use the best software to achieve an advantage over rivals, and government institutions who have critical security requirements (EG military). The biggest push on US Government (other than military) to use non-Microsoft products will be when most of the rest of the worlds governments start doing so.

    64. Re:Backstory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OH OH OH OH BULLSHIT ALERT!!!!!!!!

      What a bunch of bullshit! An average 50+ hour week? My hairy white ass!!! I bet you couldn't find 6 teachers in your whole board who pulled 50+ hours any given week in the past 3 years. The only teachers that I have ever seen pull hours like that were brand spankin new ones, who didn't have lesson plans yet, didn't have materials for class yet. After year 1, total crap. And all this puss you spew about how 80% of the teachers volunteer to coach etc.....BULLSHIT!! We all watched the after school programs totally disappear (sports, clubs etc), because teachers wouldn't volunteer to do anything for free.

      I am not a big fan of doing work for nothing, but don't start with all your bullshit about how much you give for free. You are like everyone else, you work as little as you can, for as much as you can get. The only difference is you bitches get three months off every summer, plus a week in march, plus what two, three weeks at christmas. Cry me a fuckin river. Shove that shiny red apple up your ass.

    65. Re:Backstory by j-beda · · Score: 1
      You are like everyone else, you work as little as you can, for as much as you can get.

      You must live in a not very happy world. Most people I know in all professions actually take some pride and enjoyment from their jobs, independant of the pay.

      I suggest perhaps you could benefit from some anger management. And if things are so great for a particular profession maybe you would be well served in switching careers?

    66. Re:Backstory by Darlock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Obviously you are angry at the benefits teachers get because you don't think they deserve them.

      A couple things to consider.

      1) Teachers are part of a UNION. My father was in a union at a lumber mill and they were payed more than they were worth and the benefits were phenominal. The same goes for teachers. It is the way unions work.

      2) Teachers have a quick burn-out rate. You think babysitting your bitchy kid is easy day in and day out? No, it isn't. Now add 30 more bitchy kids to the list.

      3) Teachers are in high demand. High demand = more money/benefits.

    67. Re:Backstory by linuxbert · · Score: 1

      Money will not fix education in Ontario. it is very broken, it is broken in the teachers and the methods used.

      First, with regards to Funding Cuts, in Ottawa there are two school boards. the catholic made its cuts to administration and as a result were largely unaffected. The public board on the otherhand insited on cutting programs that benifited students, and as a result students suffered. as for school closings, i have spent my entire academic life commuting to school because there wasent one in my town. those parents should really nolt complain.

      Ontarios teachers and their methods are a great source of concern to me. first too much emphasis is placed on regurgitation, as opposed to crtical thinking and understanding. the system and its methods are very disconnected from the real world and unfortunately students do not realize this until after graduation if at all.

      Parents fear change, they here stories from teachers who want more money and less work (not to say they are all bad)and get scared, and think that education today is the same as it was when they were childeren, and fight the change on an emotional and and visceral level instead of what is acutully good for their children.

      Mandatory certification and testing of teachers was one proposed and implemented solution to this concern. Teachers complained about stress and being scared of the test. Many Tech Certs require you to recertify every X years, why shouldnt teachers.

      Finaly Technology is overused in schools. Flash is begining to take over substance in student work. computers are being used to teach, instead of the teacher and it doesnt work. the sudents dont learn as much/as well

      the real measure of the education system is the results of the students, and their opinions after they have completed high school.Parents are concerned, but are too detached. Teachers and school boards have an intrest in the status Quo. when a signifigant number of students cant pass basic literacy tests, i question all technology spending in schools.

    68. Re:Backstory by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      Unions make a little bit of sense when there is some risk that the unions can make demands which can put the company out of business.

      When the organization is part of the government, the union can't possibly make demands which will put the organization out of business

    69. Re:Backstory by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      Strong disagree with most of your statements. #1. Okay, I don't disagree with this one. Unions are very good at leveraging their position during negotiations. Unfortunately in Canada most companies that are unionised pack up shop and move elsewhere where labour is cheaper; this is a natural pressure downward on union demands. Government services can't be easily moved since its inherently a local situation, such as teaching...thus their leverage is far stronger than is warranted in a free-market economy.

      2. Teachers with a quick burn-out rate? Compared to what??? I can think of at least 20 occupations that I would deem more stressful, not the least of which are police enforcement, law, doctors, and most IT careers. The fact that the teacher's pensions are so good and retention is so long in Ontario (e.g. no retention problems here, like elsewhere in the US apparently) you'd be crazy to leave.

      3. Teachers in high demand? No, the job in Ontario is in high demand. If teaching positions were in such high demand the union would be irrelevant.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    70. Re:Backstory by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      Government services can't be easily moved since its inherently a local situation, such as teaching...thus their leverage is far stronger than is warranted in a free-market economy.

      This is very key point. Public sector unions are the biggest cause of the rapidly increasing cost of government. And it's not the teachers and nurses that are the worst, they at least have good educations and work hard.

      It's the janitors and the admin assistants making 2-3 times what their jobs are actually worth that are draining this country dry. Janitors in public schools make as much as most teachers. How much sense does that make? Is there really a shortage of people able to do those jobs? I think not.

      Down with CUPE and the HEU. Outsource their asses.

    71. Re:Backstory by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      AFAIK those schools in Seattle are run by the government. How is that anti-socialist exactly?

    72. Re:Backstory by Beetle+B. · · Score: 1
      Some MS products are good, I'll grant that (Office being one of them).


      Others are just plain terrible. Internet Explorer has the least features and flexibility among all popular browsers today. It is literally years behind. Tabbed browsing and pop-up blocking were here at least two years ago.


      The problem I have is not just that they have inferior products, but that most users, including some recent CS graduates (at least from my university - UIUC) know nothing else and keep insisting that MS products are the best. They've never tried alternatives, and when presented with some, reject them in a hand waving manner - their reasons amounting simply to "But this is not the way the MS product does it".


      For this reason, I welcome the introduction of Star Office and other alternatives in schools. Let the students at least try something different, and then let them choose what to use later on.

      --
      Beetle B.
    73. Re:Backstory by drewness · · Score: 1

      I know it sounds obtuse if you don't know much about how OS's work, but really "Segmentation Fault" is a descriptive error message. It's telling you the program tried to access memory outside its segment which is a fault. Microsoft's "General Protection Fault" is the same thing, but a bit more verbose with the memory stuff it prints with it. I guess the Unix mindset assumes you'll hook a debugger up to find the problem, and the Windows mindset is that you could read the numbers off to phone support if you had to. I dunno.

      But on the other hand I see why your post got moderated "Funny". End users shouldn't have to learn all about how OS's handle memory protection to understand the errors. On the gripping hand, what would be a good error message for that?

    74. Re:Backstory by ispeters · · Score: 1

      I should have been more specific when I called bullshit. I completely agree with what you've just said, and with the second half of your original post. Sorry for the confusion and the resulting unintended flamage on my part.

      Ian

    75. Re:Backstory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The shortage of doctors and teachers is **artificailly** created by the government. The admission in med schools is limited to a certain number - in US it hasn't increased in 30+ years - no matter population growth an general growth of services and desieses. The same for teachers - you might be perfect in a given subject area but you are not allowed to teach unless you complete a several years long "indoctrination camp" where you study nothing but communist crap and have to "unlearn" your discipline. That's how things are in the US. Canada looks the same to me.
      This kind of politics is demanded by certain circles in both conuries and the voters are fast asleep at the wheel...

    76. Re:Backstory by kiwaiti · · Score: 1
      Having read both posts again several times over, I now realize my first sentence in great-great-grandparent could be misunderstood as not being exclusively about corporate buying habits (not educational).

      I should therefore refine that sentence to start somehow along the lines of "Corporate PHB's are often driven to buy MS Office when aiming for a lower TCO because...", but this is /., no editing, so I'll just put that bit here.

      Having said that, I don't think there's any real disagreement between us :o)

      Kiwaiti

      --
      Member of the Legion Of Microsoft Haters
    77. Re:Backstory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh PLEASE! If you've seen the way these school boards "manage" their funds you wouldn't blame the Tory's (or the NDP government that preceeded them which also made cuts). I know of a school board near me that had a frame relay network installed for over a year before they even used it, only to scrap it a year later with a fixed wireless network that was poorly implemented and falls apart under any kind of load and is always going down for one reason or another. But don't blame the government. Everyone has to live within their means and boards are no different. Of course, the government could just give everybody what they want run deficits until eternity, or until all your budget is chewed up paying interest on the debt.......

    78. Re:Backstory by neilcSD · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      way to read too much into a simple statement. does that make you feel good? i hope so.

      i should i have clarified for the peanuts gallery that "they" are monopolistic organizations that conspire to limit choice, forcing people to use their overpriced (and in this case, unstable) products. does that make you feel better? better grab a kleenex and wipe that snot out of your nose.

    79. Re:Backstory by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "i should i have clarified for the peanuts gallery that "they" are monopolistic organizations that conspire to limit choice, forcing people to use their overpriced (and in this case, unstable) products."

      I agree, you should spend more time making yourself clear. Now I know my statement was true.

      As for 'forcing people', sorry bub, the market forced that. Microsoft tried (is trying?) to help it along, no denying that, but the the simple fact of the matter is that Microsoft could not possibly create a monopoly without a MASSIVE amount of people saying "we want this." It's funny what you'll observe when you push aside the "I hate the popular company to hate" feelings and just LOOK at what happened.

      "does that make you feel better?"

      Yes it does, thank you. :)

      "better grab a kleenex and wipe that snot out of your nose."

      I've heard a lot of impressive insults on Slashdot. That wasn't one of them. Heh. I'm sorry I made an obseration about how you are coming across. I should have used my telepathy to read what you didn't say.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    80. Re:Backstory by KermitJunior · · Score: 1

      I guess you don't know any teachers. My mother has been one for nearly 25 years. I can't think of a week (school year) that she didn't put in at LEAST 50+ hours (And every other teacher I knew). Handouts, lesson plans, tutoring, meetings, after school stuff, etc.

      Do the world a favor and not speak when you don't know what you're talking about.

      And if you're gonna complain, have the guts to not do so as an AC.

      --
      There is a Universal Life Value Check it
    81. Re:Backstory by adzoox · · Score: 1

      The problem is this:

      Teachers originally were not meant to be "bread winners" - teaching used to be done as a societal benefit by those that cared for the education of our children.

      You basically said this: "It's not the children's education that matters, it's the selfish needs of the teacher that matter"

      Look, teachers can get by, and communities will take care of them - single mothers with 3 kids to support or a disabled husband with no income IS commonplace - but should NOT dictate how much someone earns or even deserves to earn.

      Teacher pay was NEVER meant to be supportive of a family, but since teacher pay worldwide is well above minimum wage - even single mothers and fathers COULD support themselves and their children - they just can't have cable TV with HBO and Dinner at Outback every night.

      --
      Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    82. Re:Backstory by The+Original+Yama · · Score: 1
      Flamebait or no, time and time again socialism and liberalism is proven to be the most inefficient form of government.
      What are you talking about? Liberalism is the foundation of modern Western society. If you believe in individual rights (liberty) and a free (liberal) market, you believe in liberalism.
    83. Re:Backstory by benjj · · Score: 1


      Teacher pay was NEVER meant to be supportive of a family, but since teacher pay worldwide is well above minimum wage - even single mothers and fathers COULD support themselves and their children - they just can't have cable TV with HBO and Dinner at Outback every night.


      Ha ha ha ha

      That's very nice, but unfortunately we want teachers who have degrees. The state is therefore in competition with the general graduate market.

  2. About damn time by asit+ler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's about time some major organization, even a non-profit, started using StarOffice, or OOo.

    --
    This is not the sig you're looking for.
    1. Re:About damn time by weapon · · Score: 1

      I go to the Universety of Queensland (Australia), and at uni there is Star Office on ALL library computers as well as netscape, and MS office and IE, as well as that ALL students are entitled to pick up a copy of SO (i use mine for windows so i don't have to save my OO.o files in .doc format). some how i don't see a cheeper solution to make sure all students have a word processor at home. can you guess what M$ would charge? Also the licence we get with SO (one disc for win32 linux and solaris) lets us install it on 5 machines. (single user only though).

      Dave

  3. Licensed...? by tokachu(k) · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    What, they haven't heard of OpenOffice?

    My former slight thoughts of Canada's intelligence are withering.

    1. Re:Licensed...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why not get support for very little money. Sun has such a low cost per seat that there would have been no point to using OOo instead of SO. Perhaps you would like to see development in OOo slow down, because if SO does not make Sun money, that's exactly what will happen.

    2. Re:Licensed...? by irokitt · · Score: 5, Informative

      The difference between OpenOffice.org and StarOffice is that it comes with licensing, support, and the odd extra feature included. Corporations use StarOffice as opposed to OpenOffice for the same reasons they use Red Hat as opposed to Gentoo (I said it, I'm putting on asbestos underwear, you can't hurt me!). In a corporate setting that support tends to save you a few headaches.

      Disclaimer: I like Gentoo, I just wouldn't use it as a server OS in a large corporation or an educational setting.

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    3. Re:Licensed...? by antiMStroll · · Score: 5, Funny
      "My former slight thoughts of Canada's intelligence are withering."

      Given the tortured grammar of that sentence, Canada feels no loss.

    4. Re:Licensed...? by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

      ROFL Mod the parent up!

    5. Re:Licensed...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but you are no match for my combined underpant gnomes / flaming tactics.

    6. Re:Licensed...? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      What, you mean you don't want them to support open-source software with actual money?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    7. Re:Licensed...? by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the incredibly low cost for educational institutions.

      Under its education and research program, Sun provides copies of StarOffice to qualified academic institutions for the cost of the distribution media.

    8. Re:Licensed...? by njdj · · Score: 1
      Why not get support for very little money.

      Because the support you get from a software company like Sun is no better than the free support you can get from the community.

      Note, I'm not saying that support isn't worth paying for; it can be; I'm saying that Sun's support (like Microsoft's) isn't worth paying for.


      Perhaps you would like to see development in OOo slow down, because if SO does not make Sun money, that's exactly what will happen.
      It does not make money right now. The free software community has an excellent track record of continuous improvement of software; why should OpenOffice be different?

    9. Re:Licensed...? by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      The main thing is the perception. If people perceive they've got a helpline that's paid for, then the support will be there.

      Relying on a community is fine, but it's a risk. What if the community get bored and move on? What if the good guy on there leaves?

      I'm not saying it's not an acceptable risk, or even a risk that can be calculated.

      Saying that, I'd really have thought that for schools use, Open Office would be a low risk case. OTOH, it's money and kudos for Sun that means they'll hopefully keep putting money into it.

    10. Re:Licensed...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, because Sun does 90% of the work on OpenOffice.org? Sure, take Sun away and EVENTUALLY things would pick up speed, but it'd be a very bleak few years.

    11. Re:Licensed...? by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Actually, the grammar does follow correct general structure, though not the typical structure for modern speech. Compare his statement to some made by Winston Churchill, and it will have the same feel to it. That said, Canada still feels no loss.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  4. Hosers by momerath2003 · · Score: 3, Funny

    'Canadian English'?

    Will StarOffice append '", eh?" to every sentence? Or does it simply replace "about" with "aboot"?

    --
    I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
    1. Re:Hosers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my that's funny. And so original.

    2. Re:Hosers by momerath2003 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh my that's funny. And so original.

      Yes, just like everything else on Slashdot. I have a carefully targeted audience. /bows

      --
      I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
    3. Re:Hosers by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Take off, eh!

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
    4. Re:Hosers by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As a Canadian, I was going to make this very joke, but I was beat to the punch.

      However, I would like to know from those Americans on Slashdot: Where the heck does "aboot" come from? I have never met anyone in Canada that pronounces "about" as "aboot". Do any of you know where this originates?

      (PS: "Zed" not "Zee" ;)

      --
      Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    5. Re:Hosers by Champion3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At least it will flag any occurances of "y'all."

      --
      I'm going to the casino. Don't gamble.
    6. Re:Hosers by momerath2003 · · Score: 2, Informative

      A lot of the great canadian references come from the movie "Strange Brew," based on characters from "The Great White North" which I believe was a Saturday Night Live skit.

      As for hearing anyone but them say it this way, the only peoples who I personally have heard with such an accent are those in Minnesota, which, as you probably know, is geographically very close to Canada. ;)

      --
      I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
    7. Re:Hosers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Written using the NZ edition: "Sex fush 'n' chups thanks."

    8. Re:Hosers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That should be "thunks", not "thanks".

    9. Re:Hosers by Pxtl · · Score: 4, Funny

      SCTV actually (where John Candy got his start) - it was a Canadian show, but aimed for the American mass market. There was a minute or two of extra time at the end of the show because of the difference between Canadian and American timeslot lengths, so they decided to add something "uniquely Canadian" and put in Bob and Doug in the "Great White North".

    10. Re:Hosers by Teh_monkeyCode · · Score: 1

      "The Great White North" was a skit on SCTV

      --
      -------
      Chunky Bacon
    11. Re:Hosers by Wynken+de+Word · · Score: 1

      After some analyzing, I think your post harbours a more colourful theme at its centre: you Americans miss the extra 'u', the 'z' (pronounced 'zed') instead of 's', the 'er' switch, which we Canadians held over from ye ol' Brit English. Beware the spellcheck, eh?

    12. Re:Hosers by rowdent · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was an SCTV skit. And yes, I would imagine that "aboot" comes from the Minnesota area, which is actually geographically close to Kenora, Ontario (right across the Lake of the Woods) and parts of Manitoba.

      --
      "If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." --George Orwell
    13. Re:Hosers by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you live, but I used to travel extensively to Ottawa. I have definitely heard people in the Ottawa area pronounce the word "about" somewhat like "aboot". Don't know if there's a specific part of Ontario they were from, and I know the "aboot" is recognizable as a backwoods Minnesota accent too, but I've certainly heard it in Canada.

    14. Re:Hosers by njm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, about this "oot and aboot" business... it's just plain wrong.

      Though for Americans "aboot" is what might sound closest to many Canadians' pronunciation of the word "about," it isn't correct. The sound present in some dialects of Canadian (and American!) English results from a phonological process known as Canadian Raising . The "ow" sound is pronounced pretty universally in America as [aU]--i.e. a diphthong whose first element is like the a in father and whose second is like the u in put. However, before a voiceless segment (basically a consonant during whose articulation one's vocal chords are not vibrating), the first element is raised to an "uh"-like sound; i.e., the u in tuck. This also applies to the so-called "long i," in which the /aI/ diphthong is pronounced [@I]. (This is much more common in America than the /aU/ portion of Canadian Raising, too, so it's less widely mocked this side of the border.)

      So, yeah, "oot and aboot" is wrong. That is all. ;)

    15. Re:Hosers by lvdrproject · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, America didn't have the chance to 'hold over' the use of -'ise' in verbs. When America was still a colony (colonies, if you prefer), the British actually used -'ize', which was the original form. It wasn't until the 1800s, when they decided to emulate spelling changes in the language of their neighbours across the channel, that they changed to -'ise'. The Americans, of course, had already mostly established their language (and their country), and didn't have the influence of the French like the British did, so they left theirs -'ize'.

      Coincidentally, even some British schools of grammar continue to use -'ize'. (Oxford, for example -- the traitors.)

    16. Re:Hosers by sommerfeld · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's real. Vowels tend to wander in regional dialects so what sounds like an "au" to you might sound closer to an "oo" to me. Google turned up "Canadian Raising" which explains this particular difference better than I can.

    17. Re:Hosers by bigdavex · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have never met anyone in Canada that pronounces "about" as "aboot".

      The Canadians I know say "aboot" but they don't know it. One of them asked us about the reference in South park. "What's all that aboot? We don't say aboooot."
      --
      -Dave
    18. Re:Hosers by Phidoux · · Score: 1

      No! The spell checker changes colour to color.

    19. Re:Hosers by wing03 · · Score: 1

      There was a minute or two of extra time at the end of the show because of the difference between Canadian and American timeslot lengths, so they decided to add something "uniquely Canadian" and put in Bob and Doug in the "Great White North".

      Actually...

      I believe there was a rule at that time that some TV shows had to have a certain percentage of Canadian content in order to quallify for funding or broadcast within our borders.

      More a situation like Monty Python's "Contractual Obligations" album rather than fitting in a 22 minute time slot.

      SCTV cast and crew looked among themselves and rolled their eyes. And soon were born a couple of stereotypical Canadians sitting on an old couch infront of a map of Canada with Canadian beer in hand spouting "eh?, Hoser, aboot and etc... to drive home the fact that there was indeed Canadian content in the show.

    20. Re:Hosers by hawkeyeMI · · Score: 1

      It's definitely more along the lines of abuet or aboet, similar to the posts below. A canadian colleauge of mine was visiting recently, and I noticed it and thankfully was able to restrain my laughter. Speaking (to some degree, mostly just English though) English, Chinese, and German, I have some appreciation for cultural variation in languages, but for some reason this part of canadian dialect I just find endlessly amusing. It's so subtle but once you notice it it's hard not to afterward.

      --
      Error 404 - Sig Not Found
    21. Re:Hosers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      John Candy is DEAD, you insensitive clod! Like the late Right Honourable President of the American United States of North America Ron Regan, John Candy brought peace to the fatherland.

    22. Re:Hosers by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      I've seen Canadian news anchors pronounce it "about". Canadians "raise" the U. It's sounds somewhere between "aboot" and "aboat" in my experience.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    23. Re:Hosers by Zeebs · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is more then one "Canadian Accent" Just ask a Newfoundlander, a Quebec'er, ect... Where I'm from Greater Toronto Area Ontario, I don't hear aboot.

      Speaking of odd pronounciations though, why do yanks say sarry, like the Indian dress Sarie. SORR-Y :P

      --

      Happy Noodle Boy says "F###ing doughnut! Mock me? You fried cyclops!!"
    24. Re:Hosers by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Coincidentally, even some British schools of grammar continue to use -'ize'. (Oxford, for example -- the traitors.)

      ize

      The Oxford English Dictionary argues that words which carry the sound iz whether from the Greek ending -izein or the Latin ending -izare should hold to the spelling with a z, there being no compelling reason to change.

      Fowler notes that the following words need to be spelled with -ise:
      advertise, apprise, chastise, circumcise, comprise, compromise, demise, despise, devise, disenfranchise, disguise, enfranchise, enterprise, excise, exercise, improvise, incise, premise, supervise, surmise, surprise.

    25. Re:Hosers by zangdesign · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, it's the remains of a Scottish accent from settlers in Canada.

      True story - I used to Mac tech support for a small university in West Texas. One of the nursing instructors kept saying "aboot" and when I guessed she was from Scotland, she said she was actually from Canada - somewhere in the middle of Canada, I don't remember where exactly.

      Anyway, apparently, there's a lot of it running around up there in mid-western Canada (or whatever the heck it's called).

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    26. Re:Hosers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Former President Ronald Reagan was found dead in his home this morning. There weren't any more details. I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss him - even if you didn't agree with his policies, there's no denying his contributions to American politics. Truly an American icon.

    27. Re:Hosers by kerasineAddict · · Score: 1

      This is incorrect, and the grandparent post's claim of just kinda fililng in extra time is accurate. I remember an interview with Dave Thomas (Bob McKenzie) stating that as fact.

    28. Re:Hosers by lvdrproject · · Score: 1

      The main reason i like -'ise' is the whole consistency thing. I'd rather have two or three words ('size', 'apprize', 'prize', and so forth) that are exceptions to the rule than have two-dozen (everything you mentioned). British English, on the whole, seems to have fewer exceptions than American English. (British has more consistent use of -'re', more consistent use of ligatures, more consistent use of -'ogue', more consistent doubling of consonants at the end of vowels, &c.)

    29. Re:Hosers by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      The main reason i like -'ise' is the whole consistency thing.

      Personally, as an Australian, I prefer British usage, and given any choice use "ise" over "ize". I was just quoting the Oxford view as a point of information; I don't agree with everything in the OED, especially as they recently have started to be very lax in accepting informal usages.

    30. Re:Hosers by jebiester · · Score: 1


      Will StarOffice append '", eh?" to every sentence? Or does it simply replace "about" with "aboot"?

      Isn't that New Zealand English?

    31. Re:Hosers by Lulu+of+the+Lotus-Ea · · Score: 1

      Mind you, I'm a USAian who loves Canada. I want to immigrate there, and get out of this awful rightwing sinkhole that I was born into.

      Still, the plain fact is that most Canadians pronounce "about" as "aboot". Not *exactly* the same as what you describe as wearing on your foot ("a boot"), but quite a bit in that direction versus the mid-Atlantic "ab-ow-t".

      Mr. Flibble has not only met numerous compatriats with that pronunciation, most likely he does it himself... and just doesn't hear the difference from USAian pronunciation(s). Well, for the latter, mid-Atlantic of midwest isn't quite the same as southeast, southwest, or AAVE.

    32. Re:Hosers by vawlk · · Score: 1

      Old school Manitobins (known as "tobins") say "aboot". Actually its somewhere between "a boot" and "a boat"

    33. Re:Hosers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mind you, I'm a USAian who loves Canada. I want to immigrate there, and get out of this awful rightwing sinkhole that I was born into.

      I'd gladly swap citizenship with you then, seeing as you don't have much use for yours.

      And I never heard anyone say "aboot", though I grew up 7 miles from Buffalo and had easy access to American TV and radio, so that's probably why...

    34. Re:Hosers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After having travelled to most provinces, I think that the predominant way to pronounce about in Canada is actually "aboat". But even that is mostly true in Ontario and east.

    35. Re:Hosers by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      I pronounce it "aboot", not "a big shoe" ;)

    36. Re:Hosers by MochaMan · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, I just come in the log cabin from hunting caribou whilst fending off grizzlies (and a couple o' vicious salmon) and I see some post on slashdot mocking Canadian English, eh. Well, as a born and bred Canadian, I feel it's aboot toime someone set the record straight on this whole sordid affair, 'fore a body ends up with a frozen mukluk to the arse.

      I'll give it to you straight -- we may wear toques, sit on chesterfields, and pay for our two-fours in loonies, and we may even say "aboot", but we get more beaver than anyone else on the planet.

    37. Re:Hosers by harley78 · · Score: 1

      To me (Seattleite), it seems "aboot" might be a more Western Canada thing? I've met people from toronto that didn't say it. I have however traveled extensively in BC, and BC folks definitely say "aboot" or some variation. Another poster also touched on the whole "everyone from other parts of a country have differing accents of their native tongue" thing. NS people sound funny..hehe(my opinion. I'm sure I sound funny to you)

    38. Re:Hosers by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      The guys on the Microsoft Outlook/Office support line in Nova Scotia sound pretty close to that. It sounds like they say Microsoft Oatlook.

    39. Re:Hosers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thunks.

    40. Re:Hosers by 0racle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Talk to some Maritimer then. especially someone with a thick Newfie accent.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    41. Re:Hosers by dbc · · Score: 1

      The last time I watched Peter Jennings read the news he said "aboot".

    42. Re:Hosers by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Canadian and American timeslot lengths, so they decided to add something "uniquely Canadian" and put in Bob and Doug in the "Great White North".

      I believe it was a protest about some Canadian regulation requiring "Canadian" content to be included in television programming. If they were forced to include something "Uniquely Canadian" they were going to make it a stereotype of Canadians.

      Imagine if Bill Cosby included a 2 minute Minstrel Show at the end of every episode of his show as a protest to those who didn't think his show was "black enough".

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    43. Re:Hosers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, we admit it. It was us - the Scots, we actually do say aboot. From the few Canadians I've met, theres barely a twinge of aboot left, just enough to drive the rest of you nuts, while not knowing they do it. Another fine export from the people who brought you haggis. (which you can keep by the way - enjoy!)

    44. Re:Hosers by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Where the heck does "aboot" come from? I have never met anyone in Canada that pronounces "about" as "aboot"."

      I have, but only in a couple of people. My guess is, in another 10 years, it'll go the way of radical.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    45. Re:Hosers by Mr+Smidge · · Score: 1

      premise

      Sorry to be offtopic, but who the hell would think of spelling that with a Z? We pronounce that as "prem-miss".

    46. Re:Hosers by zangdesign · · Score: 1

      No, but thank you. I prefer cuisine that's not based on a dare.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    47. Re:Hosers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called "canadian rising", which is--if I remember correctly--the way canadians pronounce the ou dipthong before certain consonants. Americans have two vowels sounds here, which to my ears sound more like "ow-oh" than anything else (although not much like that). Canadians have pretty much the same first sound, and we stay on it all the way to the 't' instead of dropping to the "oh" sound. For a reason no one has ever explained to me, americans hear this as "oo".

    48. Re:Hosers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah I had a math teacher from canada, he said "zed" a lot.

    49. Re:Hosers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't agree with everything in the OED, especially as they recently have started to be very lax in accepting informal usages.

      Duh, that's the whole point of a dictionary - to describe the language as it's used. If you want to be told how to use it, get a style guide.

    50. Re:Hosers by Momomoto · · Score: 1

      From one Canadian to another, I'll concur with you: I've never heard anybody say "aboot".

      I have, howevever, heard many "aboat"s, especially if you're in the Maritimes or the Ottawa Valley. Go figure!

      --
      "Max, come over here. French-Canadian bean soup. I want to pay. Let them leave me alone." - Dutch Schultz
    51. Re:Hosers by RobinH · · Score: 1

      The Canadians I know say "aboot" but they don't know it.

      Well, not exactly. I'm Canadian, but have been working in Michigan long enough to hear the difference now. Americans kind of pronounce the word abot, or abaut, but Canadians still pronounce it more like the British, which starts out flat (ahhh), then goes to an Ooo, then the T. Since Americans pronounce the Ahhh, and the T, all they really hear is the Oooo part, which is why they think it sounds odd.

      It's really just another case of Americans slurring their speech.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    52. Re:Hosers by Malc · · Score: 1

      Just be glad you're not from Michigan. I hear them in the summer in cottage country in SW Ontario around Lake Huron. They go to the shops askings for sacks of ass (EN-ca: bags of ice). Listening to that makes their accents bearable!

    53. Re:Hosers by greenguy · · Score: 1

      This is true. As a US citizen with a good number of Canadian friends, I can confirm that the "aboot" thing is much exaggerated. However, I have yet to read anything here about another Canadianism - their quirky tendency to pronounce their O's as if they were O's. For example, where we Yanks say "PRAH-ject," Canadians say "PROH-ject."

      --
      What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
    54. Re:Hosers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Ottawa, and I've never heard anyone say about aboot. Maybe I'm used to people saying about a bit differently, but I have a feeling that we might say about a _tiny_ bit differently, and you pick up on that.

    55. Re:Hosers by bigbadwlf · · Score: 1

      Duh, that's the whole point of a dictionary - to describe the language as it's used.

      So I can expect a dictionary with "u" and "ur" in place of "you" and "you're"? "ne1" in place of "anyone"?

      omglolkthxbye

    56. Re:Hosers by Game+Genie · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have never met anyone in Canada that pronounces "about" as "aboot". Do any of you know where this originates?

      Funny, I've hardy met any who didn't. Even in Toronto, where there is scarcely any accent to be noticed, every time I heard someone say about there was a slight 'oo' in it. It probably has to do with what each individual is used to hearing. I knew a British girl whose mother was American who honestly could not tell the difference between American and British accents.
      -

    57. Re:Hosers by unFKNreal · · Score: 1

      SCTV actually (where John Candy got his start)

      You forgot to mention Eugene Levy, Catherine O'Hara, Rick Moranis and Dave Thomas. All of them had some success in the USA.

    58. Re:Hosers by blindbat · · Score: 1

      From Oregon where the say ruff instead of roof.

    59. Re:Hosers by unFKNreal · · Score: 1

      Oh, and I forgot Martin Short also.

    60. Re:Hosers by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1
      why do yanks say sarry, like the Indian dress Sarie.

      Much more annoying to me is the whole Q-bek, and D-troy-it thing. (Probably only in Canada, but I'm going to rant anyway....)

      Quebec. With a french accent, it's pronounced K-bek, but if you're english, 'que' is pronounced 'kwe', so it should be 'kwe-bek'.
      Same with Detroit. How do your pronounce adroit? It's not a-droy-it, so why the fsck do you insist on mispronouncing Detroit?!

      Data, from Star Trek, must be an androyid.

      And everybody must be pronouncing his name wrong, because I know it's Dan Akroyid.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    61. Re:Hosers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although I agree on the hagis deal, if Zang has anything to do with your name, some of your cultural culinary treats are a little "whacky" to me! I was at a traditional chinese wedding three weeks ago, and the jellyfish and chicken dish took a little more than a dare to get down!

    62. Re:Hosers by jmichaelg · · Score: 1

      but we get more beaver than anyone else on the planet.

      When I was a kid, "getting beaver" meant peeking upskirt. It was a big deal - something to brag about when I was 10 or 11.

      Given how empty Canada is, I guess that's what it still means.

    63. Re:Hosers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is indeed Canadian Raising that is to blame for the 'aboot' phenomenon. Interestingly, 'aboot' is a generalization of the Canadian Raising rule that is used by many Canadian's in speech. American's and others who don't speak Canadian English falsely applied the rule to about and came up with 'aboot'. You may be interested in a study that one of my profs did with our class this year concerning 'eh'. http://www.canada.com/regina/leaderpost/news/story .html?id=1eb5020f-481f-4ed1-9c70-27d47fb0448c

    64. Re:Hosers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boot to the head!

    65. Re:Hosers by jeorgen · · Score: 1
      Where the heck does "aboot" come from? I have never met anyone in Canada that pronounces "about" as "aboot"

      I'm posting this a little bit late in the discussion. I'm European and I saw a documentary on TV where the doctors and all the staff spoke North American English. The only funny thing was that all the satff said "aboot" instead of "about". I had to watch that whole program just to find out where it was in North America. Turns out it was Ontario. So yes, you do say "aboot"!

      /jeorgen

    66. Re:Hosers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, I remember an interview wit a cast member (not sure which one) that corroborates the other story: they had a couple of extra minutes to fill, and it had to be Canadian.

      If it had to be Canadian, it's a fair assumption that they were appeasing CRTC (Canada's FCC) regulations that determine whether a show is "Canadian" or not. Not that SCTV had to be concerned about being Canadian, but broadcasters do. In their license applications, they promise to provide no less that a certain amount of Canadian content. Whoever was producing SCTV (maybe Global? I don't remember) either needed the Canadian content, or wanted to be able to sell it as such.

    67. Re:Hosers by byike · · Score: 1

      I had a friend in Canada who did his doctoral thesis on differences in pronunciation between Canada and the U.S. He said that Canadians generally touch the tip of their tongue to the roof of the mouth farther back than Americans do when making the 'ou' sound (try saying 'about' both ways). My personal theory is that this is so because Canada is on average a lot colder than the U.S. and that we Canadians don't want to get frostbite every time we say 'aboot'. This would explain why Minnesotans also say 'aboot'.

    68. Re:Hosers by Will2k_is_here · · Score: 1

      I'm European and I saw a documentary on TV...So yes, you do say "aboot"!

      I'm Canadian (Ontarian in fact) and speak with other Canadians daily. Not once has anyone (nor myself) said "aboot". All you have is hearsay. So no, we do not say "aboot"!

    69. Re:Hosers by dadragon · · Score: 1

      Old school Manitobins (known as "tobins") say "aboot". Actually its somewhere between "a boot" and "a boat"

      Point of interest for the Americans who were saying that Minnesota people say "aboot":

      Manitoba is due north of Minnesota. In fact, it is the only Canadian province to border Minnesota.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    70. Re:Hosers by jeorgen · · Score: 1
      All you have is hearsay. So no, we do not say "aboot"!

      No, I don't have hearsay. Hearsay is when you claim something that someone else has told you. I *saw*, and more importantly heard, the documentary (a medical documentary). People said "aboot". They were from Ontario. They did not try to say "aboot". They were normal medical staff that were filmed for other *purposes* than being example of "aboot"-pronouncing people.

      /jeorgen

    71. Re:Hosers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a canadian and I remember talking once with some people from the southern US (can't remember where), but I could not for the life of me tell the difference between their pronunciation of "crayon" and "crown". they sounded identical to me. Dialects are funny, eh?

    72. Re:Hosers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no idear.

    73. Re:Hosers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canadians do pronounce "ou" differently than Americans, but they confuse its pronunciation with how we pronounce "oo", also different from the Americans. The only way to describe these differences in print is with interjections that are pronounced the same in both.

      American: "out" starts with a sound like "Ow! that hurt"
      Canadian: "out" starts with a sound like "Oh! We see your point" (include thw w sound)

      American (not universal though): "roof" sounds like the onomatopoiea of a dog barking (ruff)
      Canadian: "roof" oo sounds like "You" without the y

    74. Re:Hosers by torok · · Score: 1

      "Aboot" is how they pronounce it on the East coast, I believe. Canada's got a massive land mass - like the southern vs northern states, people will speak with different accents all over the country. A shame that Americans tend to generalize.

    75. Re:Hosers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe it was a protest about some Canadian regulation requiring "Canadian" content to be included in television programming.

      You believe wrong. The "CanCon" requirements don't mention anything about characters or settings. They mention production, writing, performers, and recording location. Specifically, there is a formula, which assigns 'points' to each of the above factors. If your production has enough points, it qualifies as "Canadian".

      A percentage of anything shown by a TV station must be "Canadian" - not all of the shows.

      The series was filmed in Canada, and was written, directed, and performed by Canadians. This fulfills any CanCon requirements that might have existed (but which the show wouldn't have been affected by at all.)

    76. Re:Hosers by vawlk · · Score: 1

      Ontario does too. Actually most of Minnesota's border is Ontario.

    77. Re:Hosers by schon · · Score: 1

      they had a couple of extra minutes to fill, and it had to be Canadian.

      This is pure bullshit, and your insistence on the emphasized point is proof.

      There is NO requirement for anything in a TV show to be "Canadian."

      Whoever was producing SCTV (maybe Global? I don't remember) either needed the Canadian content

      Look here for what constitutes Canadian Content.

      Evaluation of Canadian content in a television program is based on the following criteria: whether its producer and key creative personnel are Canadian; the amounts paid to Canadians for services provided to make the program; and amounts spent in Canada on lab processing.

      Notice anything absent from that list?

      Oh yeah - that the nationalities of the characters , and whether they say "aboot", or end their sentences with "eh."

      Besides the fact that it's only two minutes of the program (and therefore wouldn't be enough to change the decision anyway), the fact that it's shot in the same studio, using the same people as the rest of the show, means that the show would have been classified as "Canadian" even without the sketch.

      Which shows that you are either lying, or the source you claim to be quoting was misinformed.

    78. Re:Hosers by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      The series was filmed in Canada, and was written, directed, and performed by Canadians. This fulfills any CanCon requirements that might have existed (but which the show wouldn't have been affected by at all.)

      A protest need not be directed at some injustice that you personally face. The "MacKenzie Brothers" was such a protest.

      Google it yourself.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    79. Re:Hosers by dadragon · · Score: 1

      After checking Mapquest, I find you are correct. I was thinking Minneosta was farther west than it is, and where it's bordering Ontario was in fact Wisconsin. Ah well, live and learn.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
  5. It should come with Canadian English... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all, the copies licensed at Canadian Universities do.

  6. Loss to Wordperfect, not Word by mini+me · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Ontario school board used Word Perfect in the past, which made sense, giving money to an Ontario company. I don't know why they didn't just use OpenOffice now. Unless times have changed since I was in the Ontario school system it will only be used for word processing anyway.

    1. Re:Loss to Wordperfect, not Word by BHearsum · · Score: 1

      Far in the past, yes. I was a student in Ontario for many years, and at *least* the past 5, probably much more have been with Microsoft Office. Now, we also had old versions of Corel Office stuff along with it, but everyone just used Office.

    2. Re:Loss to Wordperfect, not Word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last 5 years or so the school board here (Hamilton) has been using MS office.

      This is good news

    3. Re:Loss to Wordperfect, not Word by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      I don't know why they didn't just use OpenOffice now.

      Because as an educational institution they get Star Office for cost of media. (RTFA).

    4. Re:Loss to Wordperfect, not Word by VE3MTM · · Score: 1

      It's simple: StarOffice has support. OpenOffice does not. If they do not get an agreement for software support in the deal, there would be no deal.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 Whoops, silly middle mouse button...
    5. Re:Loss to Wordperfect, not Word by caduguid · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Ontario school board used Word Perfect in the past, which made sense, giving money to an Ontario company. I don't know why they didn't just use OpenOffice now

      You might just have answered your own question. Last I heard, (could be out-of-date now), OpenOffice had no wordperfect filters, but Star Office did. Legacy documents, anyone?

    6. Re:Loss to Wordperfect, not Word by amscanne · · Score: 1

      As a graduate of the Ontario school system (~ 3 years ago), I can say that I have never used WordPerfect. It was Word all over the place. Honestly, I think it will still be.

      What happens when the kids all come from home with their Word documents to edit at school and StarOffice can't open them? And do you think the teachers have all their documents/assignments/tests stored in a non-word format? I think not.

    7. Re:Loss to Wordperfect, not Word by Fancia · · Score: 1

      OpenOffice can open Word files just fine; StarOffice should work just as well.

      --

      Bít, zabít, jen proto, ze su liska!
  7. Re:Fools! by AmNotAScript · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But they want the SUPPORT that comes with StarOffice.

  8. One reason by Matt+Clare · · Score: 1

    It's all about the colour of money - but I'm glad to see the ministry of Ed is waking up. --Good show Calgary Flames --

    --
    .\.\att Clare
    1. Re:One reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, GO FLAMES GO!

      oh, and a plague on the home of fraiser and bettman....cambel too!

  9. Mac OS X native by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So.. yes this is offtopic, but not really if you consider the topic word processes...

    Anyway, when do we get OpenOffice native on Mac OS X, again?

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
    1. Re:Mac OS X native by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      by the same token, I'm looking forward to download QuickTime player for Linux, even though Mplayer plays quicktime files with no hitch and is not bloated like Apple QTP.

      Anyway, what's the topic here, heh?

    2. Re:Mac OS X native by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems to be a bit stale (updated Jan '04) but we've got better luck wishing for this.

  10. No chance by lavalyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Corel had a huge deal with the Ontario Board of Education a few years back, to get WordPerfect onto every computer. They got it installed... but nobody used it. The Microsoft hold was too strong by then. And this was like 2000. I don't think this had changed...

    I recall talking to the "computer" teacher/sysadmin at the time, suggesting WordPerfect or StarDivison's Staroffice on the additional Word licenses the school held. His answer was basically "but nobody will use it." Educators after all aren't accountable for costs like private businesses would be.

    --
    Doing the Right Thing should not be preempted by making a buck.
    1. Re:No chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Educators after all aren't accountable for costs like private businesses would be.

      That's not true. Each school has a budget, usually set on an enrollment basis. The difference is that there's no "profit" motive for schools. However, it doesn't make a difference since nearly all school budgets include a "fundraiser" percentage so that the county's portion of the school budget never covers 100% of operating costs anyhow.

    2. Re:No chance by rabidcow · · Score: 1

      Corel had a huge deal with the Ontario Board of Education a few years back, to get WordPerfect onto every computer. They got it installed... but nobody used it. The Microsoft hold was too strong by then. And this was like 2000. I don't think this had changed...

      Apple tried this too. They figured that getting Apple machines into schools would mean that people would want to use their machines elsewhere because they knew them.

      The truth is that it works the other way around. Businesses use Microsoft/Intel. People trained only on Apple machines aren't as valuable, so schools that can afford it start getting Microsoft/Intel machines to train their students with.

      Furthermore, the adults who learn Windows at work buy Windows for home, because they know it. So now the children learn that as well, regardless of what the schools use. Children generally wouldn't have the income to buy a computer at home, let alone Apple stuff.

      Who knows, maybe the world has changed enough for this to work, but I doubt it.

    3. Re:No chance by CoolGuySteve · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I was in school around that time. The problem wasn't so much that Office was good but rather that Word Perfect sucked. It was unstable, would present artifacts on the screen at times, was ugly, and was generally slow to load. Office was fast and relatively nice even though dealing with its autoformatting was a huge pain in the ass.

      The NT4 systems just tended to rot away after a while and need reghosting. Maybe the rotting took a heavier toll on WP.

      That being said, both word processors had little quirks that made them weird to use for students. To find the word count in Word Perfect, you have to go to File->Properties and click a tab, none which is immediately obvious. In Office, to doublespace a document, you had to go to Format->Paragraph and set line spacing to 2.0. You'd figure both companies would have gotten their acts together enough to make their products appeal to those who would ultimately choose one for a good part of their life.

      And as an aside, another argument used against WP was that Office was what was used in business and for some students, high school would be the only access to any kind of computer training in their lifetime, especially if they didn't have a computer at home. Not everyone goes on to post-secondary education.

    4. Re:No chance by Graemee · · Score: 1

      When I worked for a school board here, Corel offered Wordperfect Suite 7 for $10.00 per PC. That was $10.00 per PC in the school inculding all the ones it could not run on. Since most of the schools (48) in my districts had a vast majority of older PCs incapable of running it. It was decided to pass on this and stick with clarisworks. If we could have left out the older PC maybe we would have gone with it. After I left they aquired upgraded PCs and retired the older ones, but Corel had gone from the market and almost from the planet by that time.

    5. Re:No chance by iantri · · Score: 1
      Err.. where I am, the local school board (KPR) uses Corel Wordperfect 8 on all its machines. (These are multi-user machines running Windows 98, but I digress..)

      Micrsoft Office is 'taught' in the Business classes. Everywhere else in the board, it is Wordperfect, though.

    6. Re:No chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In Office, to doublespace a document, you had to go to Format->Paragraph and set line spacing to 2.0. "

      On the formating toolbar (which is displyed by default) there has always been a 1x 1.5x and 2x line spacing option.

    7. Re:No chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My School does not have MS Word on most computers, a few teachers have it, but the students don't get to use it.

  11. Sun Sucks and Attempts to Destroy Our Community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, how dare Sun try to destroy OpenOffice, a competitor to StarOffice, by licensing StarOffice to people.

    And, by competing against our community, Sun must be the enemy.

    What has Sun done for the community? Nothing.

    Long Live OpenOffice!

  12. Canadian English by teklob · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just because I'm bored I'll post some canadian-american english translations
    American - Canadian
    Soda - Pop
    11th Grade- Grade 11
    well thats all i can think of, that sure killed 2 minutes

    1. Re:Canadian English by ForestGrump · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sadam Heussien- Prime minister
      The only road- Highway 1
      Dollar-1.25
      (ok, you had to see that ep of south park to get it)

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    2. Re:Canadian English by Afroplex · · Score: 1

      Depends on where you are for Soda/Pop. Where I'm at (Nebraska, USA) the soda, pop and coke are used equally. Some places use sodi, but outside my geographic region. This might make an interesting but useless research paper idea for someone.

    3. Re:Canadian English by UnCivil+Liberty · · Score: 0

      passport - mullet

      --
      Distributed proteome folding @ WorldCommunityGrid.org
      Team Slashdot - Members:#1 Run Time:#1 Points:#1 Results:#1
    4. Re:Canadian English by Zagadka · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, the Pop vs Soda thing isn't Canadian vs American. Take a look at this map, which shows which term is predominantly used in each part of the US and Canada.

      The biggest differences between American and Canadian English that I know of have to do with spelling. eg: colour vs color, metre vs meter, etc. The only differences I've noticed in spoken English are zed vs zee thing, and the nonsensical way Americans use "quarter of" when referring to the time. (to me "quarter of 12" is 3, but to Americans it apparently means "a quarter to 12")

    5. Re:Canadian English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A-C
      Is that all? - I couldn't eat that in two meals!

    6. Re:Canadian English by dicepackage · · Score: 1

      I live in Detroit and everyone here calls their drinks pop. If you ask for a soda here people will just laugh at you.

    7. Re:Canadian English by lvdrproject · · Score: 1

      There are lots of places in America that call it 'pop'. Mostly the use of 'soda' is limited to the east and west coasts. 'Pop' is preferred in the northern half, while most Southerners just call it all 'Coke'. -_-

    8. Re:Canadian English by concordeonetwo · · Score: 1

      Don't forget "fibre" as in "Telus installed a fibre line in South BC to provide DSL service to people in the smaller bay towns".

    9. Re:Canadian English by shepd · · Score: 1

      And the magic Canadian Only answer is...

      ..."Soft Drink". It's what's on the menu at Swiss Chalet.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    10. Re:Canadian English by onenil · · Score: 2, Informative

      The differences you've mentioned don't apply just to Canada; in Australia, English speaking European countries, and practically every where else, you will see "metre", "colour", and you will hear "zed", and "quarter past", "quarter to", etc. Americans are the odd ones out here.

    11. Re:Canadian English by no+reason+to+be+here · · Score: 1

      the nonsensical way Americans use "quarter of" when referring to the time. (to me "quarter of 12" is 3, but to Americans it apparently means "a quarter to 12")

      actually, i and every other American I know says "quarter till," i think. Or maybe they are saying "quarter 'til" as a contraction of "quarter until," and I've even herad a few say "quarter to." I'm sure some have said "quarter of." anyway. prepositions are the cheap whores of the English language, (e.g. do you "shut down" your computer, or do you "shut off" your computer) and a few other languages besides. I know, for example, that in Latin, there is no distinction between in, on, into, or onto; all are denoted by the word in; everything else is in context. I believe this is the same in all of the various romance languages as well.

    12. Re:Canadian English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah the whole zed thing kind of freaks me out. a couple of years ago a friend and i drove the 19 some hours from des moines,IA to st. paul,MN all the way over to st. catharines,ON to meet up with some girls that we knew (pathetic, yes) for some reason or another we all started to sing the alphabet song ... at the end my friend and i said "zee" and the two girls said "zed" i think we spend all of five hours trying to figure out what the hell was going on.

      other things i noticed:
      a) for some reason around here would say "where is that spoon at?" whereas they would just say "where is the spoon"
      b) i don't care who says otherwise ... when they say "about", my ears hear "aboot"

    13. Re:Canadian English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, in England/Ireland/Scottland they say "quarter of" as well. As a Canadian, I had no idea what was meant by a "quarter of" when I first heard it there while travelling.

      If you want to have some fun, use the word "fanny" in England, Ireland, or Scottland. We think it refers to a butt. Over there it refers to something quite different and it gets people as worked up as when we use the C-word here.

    14. Re:Canadian English by dekeji · · Score: 1

      nonsensical way Americans use "quarter of"

      No matter what the accepted spelling may be these days (I don't know, the expression is not usually used in writing), I suspect that it refers to "quarter off", as in "a quarter less than", also found in expressions like "all sales 12% off".

    15. Re:Canadian English by Blimbo · · Score: 1

      Another classic one is "tuna" and "tuna fish"

      Candians say "i'll have a tuna sandwich"
      Americans say "i'll have a tuna fish sandwich"

      I guess we Canadians inherently know that tuna is a fish :)

    16. Re:Canadian English by ParisTG · · Score: 1

      Much more of these (and a lot of other info) at the American's Guide to Canada.

    17. Re:Canadian English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the nonsensical way Americans use "quarter of" when referring to the time. (to me "quarter of 12" is 3, but to Americans it apparently means "a quarter to 12")"

      i prefer till myself.

    18. Re:Canadian English by Xrikcus · · Score: 1

      They say "quarter of" in England? Thanks for informing me... I've never heard it though.... it's certainly not a southern England thing.

      "Quarter to" we certainly do though.

    19. Re:Canadian English by Zagadka · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know. The OP was talking about American vs Candian English, so that's what I was focusing on, but I'm aware of where the Canadian spelling comes from. ;-)

      When spoken, Canadian English sounds almost the same as American English (with a few exceptions), but when written, the British spelling is generally used. The only exception to the latter that I can think of is "tire" vs "tyre".

      Canadians also tend to use American phrasing. So Canadians say "elevator", "truck" and "aluminum", not "lift", "lorry" and "aluminium". (I suppose one could argue that the latter is an alternate spelling, rather than a separate word) Much of the slang in Canada is the same as in the US as well.

    20. Re:Canadian English by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

      Actually it's more like a kid's name for vagina, like 'Pee pee'. It's not that offensive.

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    21. Re:Canadian English by harley78 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I say the exact time. Most people say "a quarter to (x)1-12". I haven't seen anyone point out that 15' = 1/4 of a circle. This post is off topic in an off topic post.

    22. Re:Canadian English by harley78 · · Score: 1

      oh yeah, personally I'm a Washingtonian.

    23. Re:Canadian English by harley78 · · Score: 1

      I am retarded. Must read AND think....

    24. Re:Canadian English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, yes. Canada, Australia, and English-speaking European countries... like England for example :)

      Yes, I know England isn't really a country, but indulge me...

    25. Re:Canadian English by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Pop vs Soda thing isn't Canadian vs American

      Yes, I noticed this when I travled to the south east of America. I asked "where do you keep your pop" and every small corner shop owner said "In such and such cemitary". However I have not found one place where they didn't know what a soda was. I gave up a long time ago and ask people if they want a "carbonated soft-drink".

      Now if I can convience supermarkets that marmite doesn't belong next to the flour i'd be a happy person.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    26. Re:Canadian English by DuncMan · · Score: 1

      England is a country. As is Scotland, Wales and Ireland.

      Bits of those countries do share government and law in various combinations (and in some cases "England" is the name of a single entity comprising England and Wales), but they're still separate countries.

    27. Re:Canadian English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, in England/Ireland/Scottland they say "quarter of" as well.
      Bollocks. I'm a Brit, and I've never heard the expression used in England, Scotland or Ireland, except by American tourists. Maybe you were talking to an American tourist.

    28. Re:Canadian English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the nonsensical way Americans use "quarter of" when referring to the time.

      That's probably regional as well. Around here I'd expect "quarter t'six" or "five fourty-five." (aren't digital watches neat?)

      'course I dunno if you can consider californians as americans, since the rest of the country is filled with a bunch of freaks. :)

    29. Re:Canadian English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they're not, as much as the SNP and Plaid Cymru would like you to think.

      The United Kingdom comprises of Britain and Northern Ireland. Britain is Scotland, England and Wales. This makes the UK a Union, as opposed to a federal state like the US, but the comparision still remains: Scotland is as much a country as is New Jersey. Although Scotland has its own devolved parliament for certain issues, it doesn't have constitutionally protected powers, as states do in the US. So even if New Jersey was a country, Scotland would be less of one.

      The UK is a country.

    30. Re:Canadian English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      England is a country. As is Scotland, Wales and Ireland./p>

      England is a kingdom. Scotland is a kingdom. Wales is a principality. Northern Ireland is a province. The republic of Ireland is a country. England, Scotland, Wales and a few odds and ends make up Great Britain. Great Britain, Northern Ireland and a few other bits and bobs make up the country known as the UK.

      England hasn't been a country since about the 16th century.

    31. Re:Canadian English by Innominandum · · Score: 1

      Wow, you sure gave up fast!

      Theater - Theatre, Center - Centre and so on
      Initialize - Initialise and so on
      Color - Colour, Neighbor - Neighbour and so on
      Check - Cheque

    32. Re:Canadian English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "quarter till," i think. Or maybe they are saying "quarter 'til" as a contraction of "quarter until,"

      "'til" is an evil bastardisation.

      The original word is "till". This is a proper word and not a contraction. "Until" was invented in the eighteenth century as part of a movement that regarded monosyllables as ugly. "'til" was then invented by some dumb idiot who'd only ever heard "until" and assumed that "till" must be a contraction.

      Please, never write "'til", and shoot anyone you see doing so. Thank you.

    33. Re:Canadian English by ignavus · · Score: 1

      Sigh.

      "Off" and "down" are NOT prepositions. They are ADVERBS. You can "shut the computer down", or "shut down the computer" (both uses of "down" being adverbial).

      Likewise, you can "walk into the room", but you can't "walk the room into" - because "into" IS a preposition, unlike "off" and "down". Adverbs tend to be more mobile than prepositions, for one thing.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    34. Re:Canadian English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canadians also tend to use American 'ize' spellings rather than British 'ise' spellings for a variety of words. Also we tend to favour the American 'hemo' verses British 'haemo'. There a few others too.

      Actually, Canadians are beginning to use American spelling more and more often. I think this is know as 'Assimilation by spell checker default settings'

    35. Re:Canadian English by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

      I don't know anyone who uses "quarter of" when referring to time, and I'm a Scot in England. We use quarter to three, quarter past three. etc.

      --
      Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    36. Re:Canadian English by Malc · · Score: 1

      Here in Toronto we can buy cans of soda and it's nothing like other forms of pop or Coke. My wife sometimes drinks it with vodka. So you can use the term "soda" if you want, but don't be surprised if you don't get what you expected.

    37. Re:Canadian English by onewing · · Score: 1

      Similarly, Canadians say "hockey" as apposed to the American "ice hockey".

    38. Re:Canadian English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American - Canadian
      ice hockey - hockey
      wop hockey - soccer
      nigger hockey - basketball

    39. Re:Canadian English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Canada does have a few Canada-specific words. "Chesterfield" comes to mind. Chesterfields do exist outside of Canada (pretty rare), but they refer to something other than just a couch.

      "Parkade" I believe also does not exist very far outside of Canada, though I could be wrong on that one.

    40. Re:Canadian English by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      In the US it is a regional dialect thing as to what gets used. "of" "'til" or "to" all get used. "after" and "past" both get used.

      Having lived pretty much everywhere in the US and now living in Florida with a mesh of people from all over, I couldn't really say what region uses what. I personally end up mixing and matching.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    41. Re:Canadian English by g0_p · · Score: 1

      Maybe it would make sense if you read it as "quarter off 12", which may be interpreted as a quarter to 12 perhaps?..

      Disclaimer: Not an American or Canadian.

    42. Re:Canadian English by amembleton · · Score: 1

      LOL, thats quite funny. I'm supprised that some Americans say zed.

      I'm British and my brother learnt the alphabet from Sesame Street. I remember him always saying zee at the end of the alphabet song, so I kept correcting him. He now says zed, which it the British English was of saying it.

      I'd always assumed that all Americans said zee. I learnt something new today!

    43. Re:Canadian English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I spent 5 months living in Rhode Island, and I guarantee everyone there said "quarter of". In fact, they thought it quite strange that I say "quarter to".

      The first time I heard that phrase, somebody was saying "let's meet at a quarter of three". I looked at him blankly for a moment, then asked "When?" He responded "a quarter of three." I said "quarter to three?" He looked at me blankly and said "um, quarter of three". I said, "you mean 2:45?" and he said "yes". We both looked at each other like the other was crazy, and then went about our business.

    44. Re:Canadian English by legojenn · · Score: 1
      I live in Detroit and everyone here calls their drinks pop. If you ask for a soda here people will just laugh at you.

      No, you call it pap. I think whoever brought English to the US midwest forgot the letter 'O'.

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    45. Re:Canadian English by Zagadka · · Score: 1

      However I have not found one place where they didn't know what a soda was.

      I suspect that's because Hollywood (like most of California) uses the term "soda". Even though I grew up calling carbonated beverages "pop", I knew that everyone on TV called them "soda".

    46. Re:Canadian English by no+reason+to+be+here · · Score: 1

      OK, I used a bad example. However, off and down ARE prepositions. Take for example, "I walked down the street." or "I turned off the main street." Sometimes, prepositions are joined to a verb in contructs we call phrasal verbs, changing the meaning of the base verb. Some phrasal verbs are seperable ("I shut down the computer," or "I shut the computer down") while others are insperable ("I bent over to tie my shoes"). As such, phrasal verbs can be seen as verbs with prepositions acting in an adverbial manner.

    47. Re:Canadian English by no+reason+to+be+here · · Score: 1

      Please, never write "'til", and shoot anyone you see doing so. Thank you.

      Before you go shooting me, please keep in mind that I was merely speculating as to what other people were meaning when they said "quater till."

  13. OpenSOURCE! by Piranhaa · · Score: 2, Informative

    I know as a fact, that computer systems in schools cost a huge amount of dollars (buying licenses for hundreds of computers at a time). I think the move to open source for schools will reduce the amount of prices associated with computers and allow for that money saved to be put towards something other than software (like gym equipment, or something more useful). When they move to open source operating systems, that will dramatically decrease problems associated with Windows (as there are right now)...

    1. Re:OpenSOURCE! by agoatley · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, Microsoft's stranglehold is probably too strong by now. I don't think that schools will move to Linux any time soon :(
      Kids would immediately start complaining and asking where their good friend Microsoft got to.

      -Ashton

    2. Re:OpenSOURCE! by Piranhaa · · Score: 1

      Don't you think the school would rather have computers that work, and not have to be updated for some time? My school runs a windows proxy and router, running windows 2000 on each computer. They just threw out hundreds of PI 133's which could have still been used by putting something other than windows on it. To me it's just a waste of money and computer power!

    3. Re:OpenSOURCE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no.

      you miss the whole point of OpenSOURCE!
      ok..

      open source does not necessarily mean "cheaper" or "free". open source merely means.. well.. source opened. I highly doubt that the ministry of ed. will make use of any source code.. even if it is available to them by sun.
      so when you tout to all your friends and family to go openSOURCE!, remember that not all openSOURCE! applications are cheaper/free. get it?

    4. Re:OpenSOURCE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I run a linux lab in an Ontario school. I am under constant pressure to 'conform' and switch to M$ systems and products. Currently, a project known as 'CTMI' (Classroom Technology Migration Initiative) wants to place M$ junk on all computer systems in Toronto. Wasted millions...

    5. Re:OpenSOURCE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, you'd put Fedora Core, with Mozilla, OpenOffice.org and Evolution on those P133s? You're mad. FC really needs 256MB and an 800+ MHz CPU to run adequately.

      Sure, you could give the kids Fluxbox, Dillo and AbiWord, but you's just get laughed at.

      Bottom line: modern desktop Linux distros are just as bloated as Windows. It's a crying shame.

  14. Cost? by LinuxInDallas · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Interesting that the Canadian government can choose not to disclose the money spent on the contract. That's definitely in contrast to here in the US where even a teacher's pay is public record.

    1. Re:Cost? by Zeebs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well it is somewhere, the problem is that no one cares to look for it unless the money is declared missing by the opposition party. I believe on a whole we trust our government a slight bit more, until that it is it's brought to our attention. Good thing there is a federal election here on June 28th, god willing a minority liberal government will be in control.

      PS for Canadian Slashdot'ers: Voting is as easy as ABC, Anybody But Conservative

      --

      Happy Noodle Boy says "F###ing doughnut! Mock me? You fried cyclops!!"
    2. Re:Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WRONG -- Anyone who pays their taxes has access to government financial information. Municipal, Provincial or Federal!

      Did you really beLIEve the Liberal party when they said that they weren't aware of the $6 Billion dept the Conservative government accumulated. If you don't know you shouldn't be elected dammit!

    3. Re:Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting that the Canadian government can choose not to disclose the money spent on the contract. That's definitely in contrast to here in the US where even a teacher's pay is public record.

      Not anybody really uses this information, considering we are nearly $8 Trillion in debt.

    4. Re:Cost? by rowdent · · Score: 1

      Not that I'm defending the Fibberals, but the cabinet system allows for some details to be kept in-cabinet (or in-camera if you like), especially expected revenues and things like that. Expenditures and revenues that have already been settled are freely available, but future income and expenditures are not available because the details are often held closely by the cabinet.

      That being said, you have to be pretty dumb to work from the incumbent party's public budgetary numbers. The New Democratic Party, for example, did their own research and had a much more reasonable projection than the Libs.

      --
      "If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." --George Orwell
    5. Re:Cost? by barks · · Score: 1

      PS for Canadian Slashdot'ers: Voting is as easy as ABC, Anybody But Conservative

      This is invitation for and OFFTOPIC to this discussion. Sure...why bother to mess with a decade of dictatorship? I think the Liberal government burned their good name with the Ontario's provincial election. May I suggest you look at the realistic value of each party making good on their campaign promises before your vote is bought and sold with a cute slogan and/or flakey commercial.

      I'd rather have a government tell me they're gonna screw me, than one that lies and screws me anyways!

    6. Re:Cost? by Zeebs · · Score: 1

      Ah yes the main issue facing Canadian voters. See I would rather have them smile to my face and stab me in the back, personal preference. We're fux'd anyway you cut it, I say enjoy the smiles and let social health care take care of the knife wounds.

      --

      Happy Noodle Boy says "F###ing doughnut! Mock me? You fried cyclops!!"
    7. Re:Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Just vote NDP. They're CLEARLY the least evil of the bunch.

    8. Re:Cost? by Trickster+Coyote · · Score: 1

      Well I'm probably going to cast my vote for the Green Party. Fiscally conservative, socially progressive and for enviromentally sustainablility. They are the only party taking a long term view, such as what kind of country are we leaving for our kids to inherit, instead of seeing no further than the next election like the other parties.

      Even if the Green candidate in your riding doesn't win, your vote still counts for something under the new election campaign financing rules.

      --
      Ideology is for ideots.
    9. Re:Cost? by Canuckanuck · · Score: 1

      I'm curious, why choose the Green Party over the NDP? I've always been NDP, because I see them being socially liberal and whose views coincide with my own. I just not sure what the GP offers above them...

    10. Re:Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't you the least bit bothered by the Liberal tactics?

      * Don't vote for a party who currently has significant western support, because *THOSE PEOPLE* are evil baby eaters.

      * Don't vote for a party who currently has significant Quebec support, because *THOSE PEOPLE* are evil separatists what will wage war on Canada (raise the flag) and we cannot submit to those terrorists.

      Since more than half the population wants to vote for these evil population, more than half the population is evil.

      I'm an Ontarian, but dam it, Westerners and Quebecs are Canadians, and before the Liberal dictatorship, they voted for the Conservatives, Liberals, and NDP like "True Canadians".

      My Canada includes the Conservatives, the Bloq, the NDP, the Greens, and yes the Liberals.

    11. Re:Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What are you talking aboot!? The conservatives will makes us all better, by turning us into USAians. We'll have no health care, lots of guns, 30% poverty, and education only for the rich. Don't you want the top 1% of the population to control 80% of the wealth!?
      Just look at what the Tories did for Ontario! We're dumber, sicker, and no one can afford electricity. But who needs electricity when we're all sick from bad water!
      I luvs Stephen Harper, I wants to have his babies!

    12. Re:Cost? by o1d5ch001 · · Score: 1

      Offtopic

      PS for Canadian Slashdot'ers: Voting is as easy as ABC, Anybody But ..

      Shhh listen quietly, can you hear it?
      Chuga Chuga Choo Choo!!
      Its the Big Blue machine coming down the tracks.
      CHOO CHOO!!!!!

      Oops! I think it just ran over the Tax and spend opposition!!

      --
      Q. What is Calvin's monster snowman called? A. The Torment Of Existence Weighed Against The Horror of Non Being
    13. Re:Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Green Party is fiscally conservative these days. While the NDP and the Greens are both socially liberal parties that support environmentalism, they have different approaches to paying for it.

      Whereas the NDP would raise some taxes and try to solve problems through the government, the Green Party, from what I understand, advocates more of a "corporate carrot" idea, wherein tax incentives are offered to companies who do the right thing.

      To a certain extent, the Green Party would seem to be a good party for the old "Red Tories", the socially-conscious capitalists (as opposed to most of the current Conservative Party members, who would fall under the category of "Redneck Tories").

    14. Re:Cost? by saforrest · · Score: 1

      The Green Party is fiscally conservative these days. While the NDP and the Greens are both socially liberal parties that support environmentalism, they have different approaches to paying for it.

      I think they've had a little trouble getting the 'fiscally-conservative' message out.

      In any case, I kind of wonder how generally that message permeates the Green Party membership. I suspect that a number of them are disgruntled NDPers who wouldn't mind raising taxes.

      I do hope they get one or two of those seats in B.C. It will create a little momentum on the left and perhaps rejuvenate the NDP as well.

    15. Re:Cost? by saforrest · · Score: 1

      May I suggest you look at the realistic value of each party making good on their campaign promises before your vote is bought and sold with a cute slogan and/or flakey commercial.

      See, that's the thing. I have every confidence that the Conservatives would make good on their campaign promises if elected.

      That's exactly why I'm not voting for them. :)

    16. Re:Cost? by brucmack · · Score: 1

      It's actually just the Ontario government; provincial governments are responsible for education.

      In Ontario, public employees' salaries are public record if they make more than $100,000 (CDN) per year.

    17. Re:Cost? by saforrest · · Score: 1

      Shhh listen quietly, can you hear it?
      Chuga Chuga Choo Choo!!
      Its the Big Blue machine coming down the tracks.
      CHOO CHOO!!!!!


      Would that be Stockwell Day's 'Freedom Train'.

      Wow, I just suddenly realized that, after a Conservative victory, Stockwell Day would be foreign affairs critic. Holy crap.

      Oh well, maybe my fears are unfounded. They might make him Minister of Education and he we could all be sent back to school to learn about literal creation and how our ancestors co-existed with dinosaurs. Yum.

    18. Re:Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Retards like you should not be allowed to vote.

      Whatever spin you want to put on it, the Tories were spending more, (yes, adjusting for inflation), than at any previous time. More in absolute terms. More as a percentage of GDP. More, more, more.

      But apparently, it's still not enough.

      God forbid someone comes along who wants to make government even a little more efficient, get it out of a few small areas it shouldn't be. Immediately they're labeled "extreme", "dangerous privatisers", "destroyers of social programs", or the worst epithet of all in the Canadian political landscape "implementing US-style programs".

      So vote for your favourite tax-and-spend, it's-not-our-money, waste-waste-waste, there's-more-where-that-came-from party, and wonder why your pampered populace daily becomes ever more like sheep, bleating insistently for more coverage from all the sharp edges and uncomfortable aspects of life.

    19. Re:Cost? by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      If the Green Party is in fact fiscally conservative that would certainly differentiate them from the NDP.

      Canada has lacked a libertarian party; I may have to check out our Green Party. I had until now assumed they were wacko lefties like the European and US versions.

    20. Re:Cost? by klparrot · · Score: 2, Informative
      I think the Liberal government burned their good name with the Ontario's provincial election.

      It's unfortunate that most people don't seem to realize that the provincial and federal Liberal parties are not the same organization. Paul Martin has publicly disapproved of Dalton McGuinty reneging on his campaign promises. And besides, what choice did McGuinty really have when it turned out that the Tories had been "balancing" the budget by selling off assets? Highway 407 practically printed money for the province, but the Tories sold it off for a short term gain so they could claim the budget was balanced.

    21. Re:Cost? by Fancia · · Score: 1
      I think the Liberal government burned their good name with the Ontario's provincial election.
      But the Conservatives have burned any good name they might have had with the recent Nova Scotian provincial election.
      --

      Bít, zabít, jen proto, ze su liska!
  15. [OT] Re:Hosers by turg · · Score: 1

    Never been to the east coast then, eh, b'y?

    --
    <sig>Guvf vf abg n frperg zrffntr
  16. I'm Torn by The+Lost+Supertone · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ontario's Ed policies on sex ed aggravate me, yet this makes me happy....

    1. Re:I'm Torn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an American and hopelessly curious: what do you find wrong with Ontario sex ed?

    2. Re:I'm Torn by murderlegendre · · Score: 1

      Are you really sure that "I'm Torn" is an appropriate subject line for a comment disparaging the quality of your Sex Education?

      That's more than just a little disturbing..

      wink

      --
      There's a Starman, waiting in the sky / He'd like to come and meet us, but he hasn't got the time.
    3. Re:I'm Torn by freakmn · · Score: 1

      The fact that it includes a water buffalo?

      It's a joke, I'm practically Canadian myself, being Minnesotan and all...

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
    4. Re:I'm Torn by harley78 · · Score: 1

      wouldn't being Minnesotan be closer to a Scandanavien, or am I 20 years late?

    5. Re:I'm Torn by freakmn · · Score: 1

      No, you're thinking in terms of time, I'm thinking in terms of distance.

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
  17. Re:Fools! by sasha328 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And who would you have look after re-training required?
    Sun also has included some forms of training (and training for teachers as well)
    There's a story at ITBusiness.ca that has more information.

  18. Here's a mirror by mirror_dude · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Just in case the server crashes and burns (like they usually do),I have put up a mirror.
    The mirror of http://www.zdnet.com.au/insight/toolkit/businessap ps/opensource/0,39024866,39149910,00.htm is at http://mirrorit.demonmoo.com/r_808/www.zdnet.com.a u/insight/toolkit/businessapps/opensource/0%2C3902 4866%2C39149910%2C00.htm
    The mirror of http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/welcome.html is at http://mirrorit.demonmoo.com/r_808/www.edu.gov.on. ca/eng/welcome.html
    The mirror of http://wwws.sun.com/software/star/staroffice/ is at http://mirrorit.demonmoo.com/r_808/wwws.sun.com/so ftware/star/staroffice/

    --
    Note to Mods: When I post mirrors, it's a best guess. I don't know for certain whether or not the site will go down!
    1. Re:Here's a mirror by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      ust in case the server crashes and burns (like they usually do)

      It's ZDnet, for God's sake. That can stand anything we throw at it. Save your mirrors for Geocities pages.

    2. Re:Here's a mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir, are a tool.

  19. Need OO.o to MS filters by bstadil · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I agree. We need openoffice to MS Office filters though. I am tired of sending .sxw or .sxc files to people and having to later point to OO.c for them to read it. (Sending .doc files is not an option, as it plays to MS)

    I would be much better if you could suggest a filter that they could use within MS Office to read and write OO.o files directly.

    Once OO.o reaches a 15%-20% marketshare, the battle is won as you can then demand they read your files not that they need to be "translated"

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
    1. Re:Need OO.o to MS filters by damiam · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      RTF.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    2. Re:Need OO.o to MS filters by aled · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And a standalone viewer would be cool. MS used to have standalones viewers for office, don't know now. Perhaps a simple app that xsl openoffice to rtf to open with wordpad would not be difficult.

      --

      "I think this line is mostly filler"
    3. Re:Need OO.o to MS filters by tonyr60 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I do not grok this posting.

      I only use Star Office 7 (same as latest OO) to write documentation etc. for my clients. I send it as a Word 97 document and so far have found zero recipients who cannot understand it. OK some (a few) may comment that some formatting is not as it should be, but the objective of the document works.

      The filters are there, and they work for me....

    4. Re:Need OO.o to MS filters by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I agree. We need openoffice to MS Office filters though. I am tired of sending .sxw or .sxc files to people

      • plain text
      • HTML
      • PDF
      • RTF
    5. Re:Need OO.o to MS filters by bstadil · · Score: 1

      I am aware of this. The point was to just send native OO.o files. Not some old or half asses fileformat developed for a different purpose.

      --
      Help fight continental drift.
    6. Re:Need OO.o to MS filters by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      And a standalone viewer would be cool. MS used to have standalones viewers for office, don't know now.

      They still do
      Excel, powerpoint, access, word, publisher...

    7. Re:Need OO.o to MS filters by bstadil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you use RTF you play MS' game as you will most likely get a .doc file back. I want to send myfile.sxw and have the MS folks screw around with the filters.

      --
      Help fight continental drift.
    8. Re:Need OO.o to MS filters by 1u3hr · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I am aware of this. The point was to just send native OO.o files. Not some old or half asses fileformat developed for a different purpose.

      Those formats were all designed for interchange. Both doc and oo.o files were designed primarily to be used with their respective Wordprocessors. It's following MS's paradigm to send wordprocessing files when a much simpler format does the job without a special plugin.

    9. Re:Need OO.o to MS filters by bigchris · · Score: 1

      I used to think this, also. Unfortuneately, RTF support is crap, and .DOC support is better!

      Note to OOo developers: fixup your .RTF support!!!

    10. Re:Need OO.o to MS filters by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While I sympathize with your desire to punish MS users, they have to really want to read your document for that to work.

      Maybe you should get a big stack of mini-CDRs (or business card size ones) and give them a copy of OpenOffice with every document!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    11. Re:Need OO.o to MS filters by jazman_777 · · Score: 5, Funny
      RTF.

      I had to think for a minute about rtf. My first reaction: RTF What? The Manual or the Article? It's a short step from RTF to RTFM or RTFA.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    12. Re:Need OO.o to MS filters by Ckwop · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Once OO.o reaches a 15%-20% marketshare, the battle is won as you can then demand they read your files not that they need to be "translated"

      Yeah.. Microsoft are going to give over that easily. Sure, they'll allow you to read the text in your Open Office document no problem but it wont look right. The font might be slightly different, or the margins might be annoyingly out, or that image you placed in the document might be a little off centre.

      Then a few months later you hear the board screaming about these faulty .sxw files. "Why don't those files load properly in Microsoft Office.. open office is a pack of shit" - It doesn't matter what you say in response they've already made up their mind..

      Remember, large companies are part of the battle but the real Microsoft heartland is the SME. In a typical UK SME, the IT provision usually falls under the control of the Finance director and in general they have no real desire to know the details of the IT industry. This makes justifying anything that isn't directly related to an impact on bottom line rather difficult.

      As a key example.. our main company database doesn't even meet first normal form. It's clear to everyone here that such a database is so deeply flawed that it has to be replaced. However, trying to convince them that the move into a normalised solution a whole host better is like trying to square the circle. It's not that they don't agree the proposed solution is better they simply don't see it as important enough to warrent change. It's very odd.

      Simon

    13. Re:Need OO.o to MS filters by Handpaper · · Score: 1
      In full agreement here.
      For documents that may need modification, plain text or html is easily pasted into the wordprocessor of your choice (not sure about RTF).
      For stuff intended to provide information only or as a 'final form', such as a resume, PDF is the preferred format anyway (I hear that it's difficult to alter a PDF, is this true?). If they can't read it, well, do you really want to work for somebody who can't even d/l Acrobat Reader?

    14. Re:Need OO.o to MS filters by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      RTF? WTF?

    15. Re:Need OO.o to MS filters by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      (I hear that it's difficult to alter a PDF, is this true?)

      Well, you need specialised graphic tools (like Adobe Illustrator), and/or the full version of Acrobat (not just the reader). Also, you can "lock" them; Elcomsoft's utility (Free Sklyarov!) could easily unlock old versions but I don't know if newer formats have been cracked yet.

    16. Re:Need OO.o to MS filters by coirec · · Score: 1
      If they can't read it, well, do you really want to work for somebody who can't even d/l Acrobat Reader?
      Not all companies do their own hiring, and it's common practice in some areas for recruiting agencies to say "It would be preferable that CVs are sent in MS-Word format." at the end of job ads. What then? What I'd really like is some kind of dvi -> MS-Word process. The output only needs to be viewable and printable in Word, not editable.
    17. Re:Need OO.o to MS filters by Vandil+X · · Score: 1

      PDF.

      --
      Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, START
    18. Re:Need OO.o to MS filters by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      Well, you need specialised graphic tools (like Adobe Illustrator), and/or the full version of Acrobat (not just the reader)

      This is so not true. I generate pdfs all the time using dvipdfm.
      I put off learning LaTeX for years because I was so intimidated by it,
      only to find out recently that it's simpler to learn and use than HTML is.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    19. Re:Need OO.o to MS filters by No.+24601 · · Score: 1
      RTF.

      No, you made him so angry... he didn't even complete his thought.

    20. Re:Need OO.o to MS filters by BuilderBob · · Score: 1

      RTF.

      Rich

      Text

      Format

      ?

    21. Re:Need OO.o to MS filters by lgarner · · Score: 1

      Are you sending documents for a business purpose, or for fun? You need to ensure that the recipient can read the doc, and sending it in a little-used format doesn't help.

      Send it as PDF if you must.

    22. Re:Need OO.o to MS filters by bstadil · · Score: 1
      Are you sending documents for a business purpose, or for fun?

      Mostly fun like friends and family, but I do it occasionally in a business setting if the receiving party need me more than I need them.

      IF a significant portion of the OO.o users did likewise I think it would help to reduce the MS stranglehold. Akin to the thinking that an alternative browser only need 15%-20% marketshare before most websites will design to standards not IE.

      --
      Help fight continental drift.
    23. Re:Need OO.o to MS filters by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      >Well, you need specialised graphic tools (like Adobe Illustrator), and/or the full version of Acrobat (not just the reader This is so not true. I generate pdfs all the time using dvipdfm. The question wasn't generating but altering.

    24. Re:Need OO.o to MS filters by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      >Well, you need specialised graphic tools (like Adobe Illustrator), and/or the full version of Acrobat (not just the reader
      This is so not true. I generate pdfs all the time using dvipdfm.


      The question wasn't generating but altering.

      (reposted to fix formatting... previewed this time)

    25. Re:Need OO.o to MS filters by asit+ler · · Score: 1

      It also follows M$'s paradigm to use a binary file format for fucking text data, and a little formatting. Those dumbasses.

      --
      This is not the sig you're looking for.
    26. Re:Need OO.o to MS filters by asit+ler · · Score: 1

      Alteration can be done with software like the GIMP (afaik it has a PDF import filter), OOo, Koffice, and others. Also, alteration can be done by using software like pdf2ps and opening the ps file in an editor or something.

      --
      This is not the sig you're looking for.
    27. Re:Need OO.o to MS filters by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Alteration can be done with software like the GIMP (afaik it has a PDF import filter), OOo, Koffice, and others. Also, alteration can be done by using software like pdf2ps and opening the ps file in an editor or something.

      As I said "specialised graphic apps". Anyway, I suspect at least GIMP would render the PDF to a bitmap in the process.

  20. Before everyone starts complaining... by Granos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Before everyone starts complaining about why they didn't use a free alternative like OOo, look at the Star Office 7 link in the summary. It IS free for educational use:
    Education No license fees; cost of media and shipping
    It was probably cheaper than trying to burn and distrubute thousands and thousands of OOo CDs, since most schools don't have CD burners available that would be able to produce a quantity like that. They bulk of the 'minimal' amount of money probably went to a support contract.

    1. Re:Before everyone starts complaining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before everyone starts complaining about why they didn't use a free alternative like OOo, look at the Star Office 7 link in the summary. It IS free for educational use

      Sure, that stops people complaining that it isn't free, but it won't stop people from complaining that it isn't Free.

      In all reality though, I'd imagine this deal comes with support from Sun, and I doubt Sun offer suport packages for OOo.

  21. In all seriousness... by Trillan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A few years ago, I added a spell checker to an application I wrote. I tried to find a Canadian English wordlist, either complete or as a supplement to a British or American dictionary.

    It's very difficult to find. I eventually concluded I was going to have to contact some Canadian publishers, and around that time I decided not to bother.

    Presumably, other Canadians did what I did -- use the American dictionary and correct it from time to time.

    1. Re:In all seriousness... by shepd · · Score: 1

      Try this dictionary. Unfortunately, the author has some copyright rules that'd make Microsoft cry, so it might not be the best source, although it is accurate.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    2. Re:In all seriousness... by MochaMan · · Score: 1

      WordPerfect used to ship with both Canadian English and Canadian French dictionaries. When I haven't been able to find a Canadian dictionary, I've often been able to get an Australian one. If not, I go with the UK dictionary, and add tweaks, since it's generally closer than the US ones. With the UK dictionary, I get colour, neighbour, travelling, modelling, centre, metre, etc. With the American ones, I have to add all those.

    3. Re:In all seriousness... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Hrm. Don't the Canadians generally spell stuff like the English? Why not use the UK English dictionary? Give some words that in Canada are spelt the UK way, and the US way.

    4. Re:In all seriousness... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Uh, that guy is a nut. Most of the stuff in there is a Canadian terms or institutions listing, not a spelling difference.

      "Who Wants To Be A Millionaire, Canadian Edition" ...
      "Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?"

      "This land is your land, this land is my land
      From Bonavista to Vancouver Island
      From the Arctic Circle to the Great Lake waters
      This land was made for you and me" ...
      "This land is your land, this land is my land
      From California to the New York island
      From the Redwood forest to the Gulf Stream waters
      This land was made for you and me" (hahahahaha)

      And the ultimate idiotic entry:
      "Bank of Canada" ... "Federal Reserve System" ... "Bank of England"

      Well DUH! We have different institutions!!! That's not a spelling difference!

      Canadian English is unique, but to call it anything other than a mixture of UK and US spellings is stupid. About the ONLY unique word to Canadian I could find was 'garburator'. Weird. This guy is just a rather over-patriotic person.

    5. Re:In all seriousness... by Trillan · · Score: 1

      When I'm typing using a US dictionary, it's workds like colour that it marks as mispelled. But when I'm using a UK dictionary, it highlights as incorrect "new" words like prioritize or finalize. Maybe those are bad examples, since I don't think "finalise" is ever correct -- the more general problem when using a UK dictionary is that -ize endings are corrected to -ise.

      There's a few other problems. For instance, some sources say that the correct spellings are "honour" and "honorable"... note the dropped "u" when an ending is added. Yes, that was intentional on my part -- and a UK dictionary would insist on the "u." Some Canadian English dictionaries insist on the "u" as well.

      I used to have a really great Canadian writing guide from college, but I think I dumped a litre of Dr. Pepper on it a few years back.

    6. Re:In all seriousness... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Then it would be the UK dictionary that was wrong. I admit, Word's UK dictionary is pretty dumb in marking 'ize' words as incorrect in UK English. In fact, most English dictionaries will list the 'ize' form as the correct form for UK English; my Collins English dictionary shows 'finalize' and 'generalize' as the first spelling of the respective words. However I think both variants should always be listed in UK dictionaries.

    7. Re:In all seriousness... by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Uh, that guy is a nut

      Hey, I don't deny that (although he seems the rather decent sort of nut). But there's better stuff on his site than the dictionary to show it (hey, apart from the added pointless crap, the dictionary is accurate):

      Which flags are correct
      People who can't fly a flag properly
      National Anthem Etiquette
      Response rate to rants (thank God he isn't on slashdot)
      142 things people need to explain to him
      And a link because, hey, why the hell not
      The answer is: You got the "troll" tag added to your account. Try not calling for a year and see if that helps.

      Now, perhaps someone can explain to me why I am still up?

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    8. Re:In all seriousness... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      For instance, some sources say that the correct spellings are "honour" and "honorable"... note the dropped "u" when an ending is added. Yes, that was intentional on my part -- and a UK dictionary would insist on the "u."

      If by sources, you mean actual books, in UK English (and most Commonwealth countries) it's honour, honorable; humour, humorous; labour, laborious, and a few others in that vein. Most spellcheckers, certainly MS's get this wrong, they assume all word forms follow the root.

    9. Re:In all seriousness... by Trillan · · Score: 1

      Thank you! Okay, so if I keep trying UK English dictionaries in programs I'll eventually find a good one. :)

      Interestingly, ASpell seems to get it wrong as well.

  22. Microsoft will retaliate by tisme · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Microsoft is not going to let this happen, and I think I know what they will do. First, drastic price cuts will be implemented followed by the creation of additional tools and resources for schools and teachers.

    The reason Microsoft will refuse to give in, even if it means that they might lose a load of money in the short run, is because they understand that if they can get students hooked while they are young, they can keep perpetuating a monopoly. My younger siblings want Microsoft Word/Powerpoint/Excel on their computer/laptop simply because they know it from school.

    It will be a tough fight if larger inroads are made, because Microsoft will certainly retaliate. Another problem is schools are still able to opt for Microsoft Office instead, which many of them will certainly do.

    1. Re:Microsoft will retaliate by Ainu · · Score: 1

      Ahh, yes. The Microsoft Crack dealers. Here little boy, try this! It's free! It makes you feel good! Your head doesn't feel so good? Don't worry, that will pass. You need another hit? That will be $299 and I'll give you this nice pipe to go with it too!

    2. Re:Microsoft will retaliate by TTL0 · · Score: 1

      true. After a few big articles on ./ on how the Israeli Gov't was going to do the same, MS bullied thier way into a deal and SO was never installed.

      --
      Sanity is the trademark of a weak mind. -- Mark Harrold
    3. Re:Microsoft will retaliate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't give up all hope! :-)
      I run a linux lab in a Toronto high school. I've been making copies of Mandrake 10.0 for students to take home and use :-). I use linux exclusively for all my courses. I have a few students who have publicly declared that they have wiped M$ from their computers, having become fed up with BSOD, viruses, spyware, etc. There is hope! :-)
      A few elementary school teachers have shown interest, and I've given them copies of MandrakeMove and Knoppix 4 kids. Good reviews so far...:-)

      Ladies and gentlemen, we need to plant seeds...some will grow, some will not...nourish those that show signs of growing...:-)

    4. Re:Microsoft will retaliate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My school uses Corel, and I belive that is true acroos my school bord, so Microsoft won't care, at least not very much, it's not like they loose business, they just faild to grab a new contract :)

  23. Correction. by Raven42rac · · Score: 2, Informative

    It is not "Canadian English", it is "The Queen's English" that pretty much every other English-speaking country other than the US uses.

    --
    I hate sigs.
    1. Re:Correction. by tisme · · Score: 1

      Not entirely true, Canadian english borrows heavily from both English proper and American English, and is viewed seperately because some terms used from English proper would be wrong, whereas others used from American English would be considered wrong as well. Canadian english is a mixture of the two and I must say Microsoft Word does a dang good job of getting it right for the most part. I am going to look into availability of language packs for OpenOffice & StarOffice for Canadian english and compare them with Canadian dictionaries to see if they are as good as Microsoft Word. Frankly, they should be because all it takes is for someone to copy the appropriate words from a Canadian dictionary straight into a spell check...

    2. Re:Correction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having been to both southern England and the Eastern and Western edges of Canada, I have to disagree - Canadian English is in a class all its own.

    3. Re:Correction. by rowdent · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I don't know where you're getting your information from... Last time I checked, "The Queen" didn't write the grammar books... Canadian English differs greatly from British English. For example, many of us use Z's instead of S's in words such as jeopardize. However, Canadian English is very much subject to personal preference, and so it is very difficult to have a definitive "Canadian English" at all, let alone a dictionary of Canadian English

      --
      "If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." --George Orwell
    4. Re:Correction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a troll, it's the correct term.

    5. Re:Correction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I checked the Queen was still the Canadian head of state. That would make Canadian English the Queen's English.

    6. Re:Correction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Last time I checked the Queen was still the Canadian head of state. That would make Canadian English the Queen's English. "

      That's so retarded. By the same flawed logic, is US English "Bush's English" then?

      The Queen's English is just another name for Received Pronunciation, also known as BBC English:

      http://www.yaelf.com/rp.shtml

      From the linked page: "[RP] is still the accent of the Royal Family..."

      The reason why it's know by these names is that it is clear, comprehensible and standardised, something which also helps non-English speakers to learn.

      Enjoy, AC troll

    7. Re:Correction. by iantri · · Score: 1
      Clearly you are not Canadian.

      We "-ize" things, but also "our" things, if that makes any sense.

      That way you end up "colourization", not "colorization" or "colourisation".

    8. Re:Correction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *whoosh*
      You missed the point. I was deliberately using the parents same flawed reasoning.

  24. The context in which this occurred by Qwavel · · Score: 5, Informative

    For anyone interested, here's (my interpretation of) the political and economic context in which this happened. This is a big win for OpenOffice, and I think this contextual information is relevant to the school boards decision to stop using MS Office.

    Ontario, the most populous province in Canada, has had almost a decade of right- wing government: tax cuts and spending cuts. The economy has, on the whole, been pretty good but the debt and deficit have continued the rapid rise that began with the 89-93 recession.

    Over this period the government has fought its main battles with the powerful teachers union to try and save money on their education budget.

    In the recent election, both the incumbent right-wing party and the centrist party lied outrageouslly about what they could do in spite of the state of the budget. It seems that you have to do this to get elected these days. (The only party that told the truth about the budget got clobbered.)

    The centrist party won the election and then had to come thru on its promises, which included a better relationship between gov't and teachers. This was clearly impossible, so they had to look at every conceivable way to save money without hurting teachers or letting any more schools fall apart. As usual, this exercise in cost cutting didn't yield even a fraction of what was promised, but it did get them to drop MS Office.

    So, maybe debts, deficits, cuts, and politians aren't all bad.

    But don't expect to see anything similar in big businesses. In my time doing systems consulting I found that, while government, small businesses, retail, and manufacturing were pretty strapped, most sectors of big business were wallowing in cash. The amount that these big companies are wasting on MS software is a tiny fraction of what they waste on all sorts of other things.

    1. Re:The context in which this occurred by killjoe · · Score: 1

      "The amount that these big companies are wasting on MS software is a tiny fraction of what they waste on all sorts of other things."

      Give it time. MS monopoly was not built in a day and it won't dissolve in a day either.

      One business will drop MS. All else being equal (iffy proposition I know) that business will be able to beat the competition because they have cut their overhead by a small percentage. The competition will also drop MS to keep up. Eventually the monopoly will unravel like a sweater.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    2. Re:The context in which this occurred by Malc · · Score: 1

      You bash the Liberals and the Tories, but do you really think initiatives like Rae Days were truly sustainable? The provincial government isn't going to be able to provide much of an education if they go bankrupt or drive all the tax paying businesses away.

    3. Re:The context in which this occurred by Alt-kun · · Score: 1

      The NDP had screwed up the first two years of their mandate, yes. Give them some credit though, by the time 'Rae Days' came along, they'd done their big ideological reversal and were trying to cut spending and balance the budget. (Rae Days were his attempt to cut civil service budgets without mass layoffs. Not that the civil service appreciated it at the time; bet they did later, though...)

      Poor Bob Rae, he thought being honest and trying to compromise was going to cut it... he just ended up pissing off all sides. The fact that he was stuck with a load of incompetent ministers didn't help either.

      The recession was hardly their fault, though. That was Mulroney and Crow between them.

      Back to the topic at hand, I notice the article said that OpenOffice was a competitor to StarOffice. Isn't that like saying Mozilla is a competitor to Netscape?

    4. Re:The context in which this occurred by Malc · · Score: 1

      Back to the topic not at hand: it would seem like Jack Leyton has a similar problem. Other than Olivia Chow, he doesn't seem to be surrounded by other personalities of note or who have general wide-spread acknowledgement.

      As for your other comment: chuckle! I think we have a lot of people commenting here today who really don't much about the relationship of SO vs OO, nor how SO works from a licensing and support perspective.

    5. Re:The context in which this occurred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an employee in the financial reporting branch of the Ministry of Education, I'll give a bit of backstory. This is the public knowledge that the public's not interested in knowing or remembering.

      Pre-1997, the funding formula held no accountability in how funds are spent - here's a chunk of money that's based on how many teachers you have on the payroll. Good times, noodle salad.

      In 1997, a new funding formula was implemented that meant that funding was now based on how many kids you needed to teach. The formula also includes as part of the system a way for funding to be checked, double-checked, triple-checked, includes ways for excess funding to be culled back (as part of the double & triple checking), and everything that you might spend money on has a category. Any money spent is now based on how many kids are there. Bus funding is an allocation based on the number of kids, and we can tally it all up based on benchmarks that get re-evaluated year after year. Same as teacher salaries - we can do projections on how many teachers are going to be needed in the future based on population growth and enrolment estimates, which also helps the minister make his funding decisions. We can factor teacher salaries into the model to find the disparity between what our benchmark says, and what the unions declare that they're paying as part of their contracts (note: we use that information to update our benchmarks, keeping us up to date and in proper stead).

      Now, for the most part, this really works well. Most school boards are good about their spending and reporting, they're good folks and responsible, and our auditors work together with school board officials and principals to make sure that everything gets funded right. The system works well for most boards. Perhaps not perfectly, but it's working quite well for most boards.

      Most.

      We gave some of the really big school boards a huge chunk ton of change to adjust to the new funding formula. Most of those boards did good. A few boards - some of the largest - didn't do good. Toronto in particular got about $900M, which they promptly wasted on dinner for about 5 years. Seriously, they spent the money on living it up. It was in all the papers. Do you not remember THAT?

      It was at that time that it was also revealed that those boards were going to run deficit budgets, which really rankled us because we were left saying "What? Why? What'd you spend the money on?"

      Teachers or kids... guess who suffered?

      Of course Toronto's schools are crumbling, and the kids aren't getting good educations. There's another administrative body that's frittering away the funds, but that's OK, because the government is always the bad guy, right? The pools could have been kept open, the schools could have been fixed up nice, materials could have been purchased for MANY years, they could have gotten updated textbooks and filled their libraries up.

      They bought lunch instead.

      Our government at the time went for Accountability (not necessarily cost cutting as the above post states), and that's what we got. The government can now account for every penny given to the boards, and that's how we attempted to manage lower funding to boards - identifying and removing the excess. The boards SHOULD be held accountable for the condition of their schools (School Renewal Allocation - yes, it's there) and the level of education they provide to their students, but why do that when you can garner public opinion by blaming the ever-unpopular government?

      Our problem is that we can't FORCE them to be accountable. We can check on them and shake our fingers, but we can't make them spend the money on what it's for. Most boards do, but unfortunately our bigger boards haven't been playing nicely.

      As per the issue at hand, StarOffice being licensed to the school boards: This is part of a program that's attempting to formalize funding for computers and computer programs in schools, which we can eventually stick under some category in the formula and fund according to some benchmarks.

      Thank God we're buying them the licenses instead of handing them cheques this time. Hopefully they'll use the licences (I imagine most of them will).

    6. Re:The context in which this occurred by Qwavel · · Score: 1

      The "rae days" were never meant to be sustainable. They were a short term measure during the recession.

      As for going bankrupt, you've forgotten that Rae's time in power almost exactly coincided with the last bad recession we've had.

      During a recession you are supposed to stimulate the economy and the only way to do that is to increase the debt by borrowing from 'elsewhere'. You can cut taxes or increase spending, it doesn't matter, as long as you are bringing money into the economy from elsewhere.

      So it made sense for Rae to do that. You could argue that Rae did it far too much. Perhaps that is true - I don't know the right amount. But for the Tories to keep running a deficit and stimulating the economy during good times made no sense at all.

      Same in the US. I forgive Bush Sr. for running a deficit because he governed during the same recession. But Reagen and Bush Jr. should not have been running huge deficits.

    7. Re:The context in which this occurred by Qwavel · · Score: 1

      I don't have time to respond to all that you've said, but I'll make a few quick comments:

      I would take the info you are presenting more seriously if you weren't anonymous.

      Regarding accountability, I agree that it is very important. If the teachers spent $900M on "living it up" then that is beyond outrageous, it is criminal, and they should never have been allowed to. But I think you should provide some evidence.

      Something doesn't add up in your story. You say that all they were trying to do was increase accountability. But in this period tons of money dissapeared from the school system. Building stopped being repaired, teachers salaries got frozen, students starting having to pay for more things themselves, classes got bigger, auxilary staff (including pyshiatrists, etc) got axed.

      Increasing accountability in the face of waste should have had the opposite effect.

    8. Re:The context in which this occurred by Eric+S.+Smith · · Score: 1
      If the teachers spent $900M on "living it up" ...

      This may well have been how the provincial government saw things, except of course that teachers have no money to spend. The school board gets the money, and the school board, which consists of staff directed by elected trustees, spends the money. It's an easy thing to confuse for outsiders, and the "Common Sense Revolution" was based on a simple-minded outsider's approach.

      As you rightly point out, "tons of money dissapeared from the school system". And it was the provincial government that made it disappear: they were deeply suspicious of the civil service, hated unions, and were anti-intellectual.

      Schools were an obvious target for cuts, but the provincial government made very sure that the local boards could be blamed for the results. They used a similar trick when they foisted new costs on the municipalities: they centralized authority and distributed responsibility.

      The Ontario Tories were the sorts of people who'd trip you and then call you clumsy.

  25. 'Canadian English' pack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    eh?

  26. Well,... by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1

    This needs modding up. That's a pretty big detail to have been overlooked.

  27. Is this such a great idea...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ... Training students with a suite of programs that (unfortunately) aren't used by most of the corporate world?

    Yes, it's good for StarOffice to gain a foothold in the next generation. But being proficient in it won't get you a job.

    1. Re:Is this such a great idea...? by BCW2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They will also be proficient at Open Office and it is comming soon to business near you. There are at least two furniture makers that have switched to OO 1.1 in the last year. They don't want to pay the M$ tax any more. They are also looking hard at Linux for the next time they purchase new computers. Some of the smaller ones have switched too.

      More businesses are heading that way, they don't need the expense of M$. They don't see any benifit in paying for Office. Functional and cheap are getting more important.

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    2. Re:Is this such a great idea...? by wing03 · · Score: 1

      ... Training students with a suite of programs that (unfortunately) aren't used by most of the corporate world?

      Yes, it's good for StarOffice to gain a foothold in the next generation. But being proficient in it won't get you a job.

      My fellow Canucks /.'rs, Repeat after me.

      Gov't funded and developed Unisys Icons running QNX will be the computer and OS of Canadians coast to coast for every and all applications.

    3. Re:Is this such a great idea...? by Zeebs · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a graduate of the Ontario School Systems , High School diploma here pretty well qualifies you to work as labour, exceptions exist of course. On w hole however you can't really go further with out a trade certificate, a College Diploma(applied education) or a University Degree. Even if the basic concepts of word processing weren't transferable, you'd relearn the appropriate software package somewhere in your post-secondary education.

      --

      Happy Noodle Boy says "F###ing doughnut! Mock me? You fried cyclops!!"
    4. Re:Is this such a great idea...? by erikturk · · Score: 1

      You probably didn't like studying Turing (the computer language at UofT in early 1990's either)

      It took me 10 years to realize that learning turing helped me learn lots of other languages (even perl!) instead of learning how to write macros in 123 or excel (It was 1991...)

      I don't thing that learn SO will hurt the learning of other office applications.

    5. Re:Is this such a great idea...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've used both. Anyone that can't make the transition from SO to Office probably doesn't belong behind a keyboard. Hell, the transition from Office 97 to Office 2000 was more complicated.

      Now, over the years, I've had to transition from Wordstar to Wordperfect to Office (just to name the popular ones that everyone will recognize), all with no training whatsoever and no guarantee that being proficient in them would get me a job!

    6. Re:Is this such a great idea...? by Gorath99 · · Score: 1

      >... Training students with a suite of programs that (unfortunately) aren't used by most of the corporate world?
      >
      >Yes, it's good for StarOffice to gain a foothold in the next generation. But being proficient in it won't get you a job.

      I've never used StarOffice, but I hear that it's very similar to OpenOffice. If that's so, then for 99% of all users the difference between StarOffice and MS-Office is pretty minimal. It's not like WP5.1 vs Word 6.1 or anything. If you know how to use StarOffice/OO, you know how to use MS-Office.

      The difference only becomes pronounced when you start to use the advanced features, but it's not like you learn to use those at school anyway.

    7. Re:Is this such a great idea...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And being proficient in Word will? Maybe if you are a typist...

    8. Re:Is this such a great idea...? by mwillems · · Score: 1

      Two answer to this (from a 25-year IT user who has switched to OOo fully):

      a) OOo is really very similar to office. My son switched in minutes. For 99% of the usage, you will never see the difference. (And try to export a PDF from Word!).

      b) Students do not learn rote monkey skills - they learn to use IT applications in general. Know one app, know them all. I could switch in an hour to WordPerfect, I am sure, or to any other word processor. Learning OOo is a perfectly good way to learn to use Word processors. A student who cannot switch to Office easily after using OOo is not sa student I would hire, personally.

      Michael

      --

      ---
      BDOS ERR ON A:>
  28. Western Ontario by eisenbud · · Score: 2, Informative

    I drove west across the Trans-Canada Highway in '98 on my slightly roundabout way to California, and there was a definite patch of people saying "aboot" in Western Ontario. It was a long time ago now, but I think it was mostly between Sault Ste. Marie and Thunder Bay.

  29. Karma whore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea, like zdnet and sun are really going to get slashdotted.

  30. Re:Fools! by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

    Don't bash people who want the support version. Just in case some teacher can't use the suite, Sun probably has someone take calls (and it co$ts them to take those calls to).

    Ok OK.... geeks would never EVER call a support centre (not without wasting a day trying first), which is why they simply cannot understand the need to pay for support...

    BUT, the average folk WANT this support everytime they mistakenly save their file in Open Office format and their MSWord buddies can't read it - or they do something silly on the PC which has NOTHING TO DO with Star Office, but they blame Star Office anyway. They have NO TIME to fix it, and they want someone else to do it.
    To a geek, paying for this boggles the mind, but to the average user it makes perfect sense to PAY for this support AND they are prepared to pay for it. Sun is doing them a favour by offering it.

    Believe it or not, that's a business plan with no ??? in the middle.
    What's also unbelivable is that many businesses use Windows server and still intend to use it.... but we'll save that for "Ripley's believe it or not!"

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
  31. Intresting by gremlins · · Score: 1

    Its aboot time aye

    --
    just because your a schizophrenic doesn't mean people arn't really out to get you
    1. Re:Intresting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? We're not australians...

  32. Canadian Software Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Generally Canadian don't give a dam about software piracy. As a result most high school student have office XP on there home computers and only know how to use word when they get to school. Using star office is good because it might just be close enough to Office XP for student to switch. If they leave evan an old copy of Microsoft office on the computers student will go with what they are comfortable with and Star Office will never be used.

    1. Re:Canadian Software Piracy by Technician · · Score: 1

      If they leave evan an old copy of Microsoft office on the computers student will go with what they are comfortable with and Star Office will never be used.

      Are Business Software Alliance (BSA) audit threats only a thing in the US or should the Canadian schools prohibit MS software to prevent very expensive liability?

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    2. Re:Canadian Software Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Students will use what they have on their home computers so that they can transfer work back and forth, and that will be what their parents can afford. So if StarOffice / OpenOffice is cheaper and can be used both places it will be.

  33. Re:Fools! by jm91509 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    And who would you have look after re-training required?

    Its for schools. They havn't been trained at all yet.

    Get em while they're young :)

  34. And the point is by bstadil · · Score: 1

    The point is to avoid sending .doc files Word97 or otherwise. Send native OO.o files and let the MS folks screw around with the filters.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
    1. Re:And the point is by hawkeyeMI · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Much of an MS-hater as I am (and oh, I am), just try that on a resume or other such application that requires MS or other closed formats.

      I mean, maybe you don't want to work for a company with such policies anyway, but often HR is quite separate from where you'll actually be working... if you get the job.

      Not that I have real world experience, being a professional student at this point. I'm just pessimistic and cynical when it comes to cracking the MS stranglehold.

      Windows free since 2000

      --
      Error 404 - Sig Not Found
    2. Re:And the point is by Zro+Point+Two · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've actually started sending my resume in plain text format...and have had a few more callbacks than I normally would have gotten. Not just the initial ones, but since companies use OCR to scan resumes to plain text and then put them into a database, they can get messed up, and therefore, miss your resume when searching later. With the plain text, it goes in exactly how you want it.

      I just state in my email that I'm sending the resume in plain text to avoid software version confusion, software vendor confusion, and virus prevention (obviously worded a bit differently).

      It also doesn't hurt that there have been quite a few macro viruses throughout the years, and people are more likely to open a .txt file.

      And the final benefit to me sending it in plain text is that even though I normally use Windows, I do try out various flavors of linux here and there, and I can ALWAYS pull up my most recently edited resume, edit it, and save it, knowing that I'll be able to open it again in Linux/Windows without having to install OO/MSO.

      --
      Zro . two

      "I come from Canada...they say I'm slow....eh?"
  35. Re:Fools! by AmNotAScript · · Score: 1

    I think you took my post wrong. As an IT worker for an educational system, I understand how valuable it is to have a "one number" sytem in place. That's my point.

  36. CD's? by phorm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Our school district uses OO, and we don't burn CD's. That's what network shares are for. For unconnected machines, sure - you can use a CD - we techs have them. A user could burn a copy if needed.

    It's easier to network-install 3-5 copies rather than popping CD's in and out anyhow, and I'd imagine most PC's are not standalone these days.

    1. Re:CD's? by Granos · · Score: 1

      Well, in that case, cost of media and shipping would be zero, and it would still be as free as Open Office, and they would only be paying for support =)

    2. Re:CD's? by spincycle1953 · · Score: 1

      "Our school district uses OO, and we don't burn CD's. That's what network shares are for."

      It is? Oh, yeah, that makes sense. All this time I thought network shares were for spreading worms. Thanks for clearing that up.

      --
      My other machine is a lever.
  37. Open Source and Green Party by mfuhrer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Expect to see more such moves if the Green Party of Canada comes to power in this month's federal election. Not that they will actually win the election, of course, but the Greens do explicitly support open source software in their platform

    1. Re:Open Source and Green Party by squaretorus · · Score: 1

      This is off topic to an extent - so shoot me!
      One of the things that bugs me about the Green party (wherever it might be - here in the UK we have elections shortly aswell for local and EU gov) is that they bolt on all these 'well its all good' fluffy stances to the core message.

      Political parties start to get bland and shit when they start having just as many +s as -s in the eyes of the individual.

      OSS - alienating to the majority who know nothing about it
      Gay Marriage - alienates a generation of old dudes who just think its all a bit odd
      Anti War - alienates a bunch of people who think saddam needed a kicking (oops - I mean that 'the war on terror is right and just')

      there are more - and MANY more on a highly localised basis, from new roads, to planning applications.

      It just takes one policy that you HATE to stop you voting for the other 99. If the greens just stuck to a basic stance of 'environmental sense' as the drive for all policies they would, in my opinion, gain a much greater support.

      (and before the /. pink contingent start on me, I'm neither anti OSS, homophobic, or pro war - but face it - lots of people are who would otherwise vote to save the penguin).

      Always end with a crap pun! Thankyou!

    2. Re:Open Source and Green Party by Idarubicin · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Expect to see more such moves if the Green Party of Canada comes to power in this month's federal election.

      Well, that's an interesting remark on several levels.

      Education policy is in the purview of the provinces, not the federal government. It's a right that the provinces have historically jealously guarded; they would probably defy such suggestions from the feds just as a matter of principle.

      'If' the Green Party comes to power? Nationally, they have less than 10% support. As the parent notes, they're not coming to power. If a minority government is elected, they might hold some swing votes in a coalition government.

      In Ontario, it was a provincial Liberal government that adopted StarOffice. Based on this precedent, it could be argued that one should vote Liberal for more such moves....

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    3. Re:Open Source and Green Party by earthforce_1 · · Score: 1


      Actually, they didn't win even ONE seat last election, and are just as unlikely to this time around.

      Voting is all about compromise. No matter which party I vote for, there is always at least something I don't like about the person or party I vote for when I make my X beside a candidates name. I am sure (no matter what your political stripe) most people feel the same way. And yes, in Canada we do make an 'X'. Voting is something we do the low tech old fashioned way, none of these f*ing Diebold machines or dangling chad. Computers are great for tabulating votes, but I honestly prefer paper ballots. (We still know who won in a matter of hours, so my opinion is don't fix it if it ain't broke. But that is another story...)

      --
      My rights don't need management.
    4. Re:Open Source and Green Party by WookieinHeat · · Score: 0

      Since the Liberal scandal the Green Party is now above 5% in the polls. This created a bit of a buzz when the CBC refused to include them in a debate with the other three main parties, which was odd because the Green Party is running higher right now than the NDP was in the last federal election.

      I would really like to see a different party in power other than just another one of the main three. They are all old, worn out and have major downsides. I think the Green Party would be a nice change and could bring the government back down to earth. It's sureal to see our government act as if it is running some crappy little country where this type of behaviour is expected.

    5. Re:Open Source and Green Party by bwalzer · · Score: 1

      The really "out there" part of Green platform is that they want to limit the term of software patents to 7 years. That's a remarkably obscure position to take. My impression is that the more popular parties are pretty much totally ignorant of any sort of IP issues. If you get to see some non-Green party federal wannabes this election, a fun question might be "But what is your position on some of the important industrial policy issues, for example the Green proposal to limit the term of software patents?". Assign extra points to those who actually admit that they don't have the faintest idea...

    6. Re:Open Source and Green Party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Acually the NDP does too. I've e-mailed their science/industry critic a while back and got back an e-mail saying it was in their policy.

  38. Canadian = British = English != American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the record "Canadian" english is actually just english. It is only "American" english that has been bastardised to the point that it requires distinction.

    1. Re:Canadian = British = English != American by hey · · Score: 1

      There are differences between Canadian and British.
      Eg: in Canada its elvator (like the US) instead of lift.

    2. Re:Canadian = British = English != American by MochaMan · · Score: 1

      Eg: in Canada its elvator (like the US) instead of lift

      Also, in Canada, it's it's instead of its. *ducks*

    3. Re:Canadian = British = English != American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You give the poster far too much credit. You won't have to duck - more likely is the poster will take it at face value.

    4. Re:Canadian = British = English != American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "elvator" is some sort of robotic Mexican gang member, right?

    5. Re:Canadian = British = English != American by Random+Guru+42 · · Score: 1

      Canadian English takes on some of the peculiarities of the American dialect of the language, but mostly retains the classic British spellings. On top of all this, we have a French influence on our dialect. Pronunciation, as we all know, leans towards the Americans.

      With two strong influencing dialects plus the Quebecer salting, ours allows for much flexibility (as much as my primary school teachers denied it).

      By the way, on "eh". It's for the most part localised to Ontario, but mocking its use isn't just a hit on those of us in Ontario. You're also hitting quite a few Michiganers.

      --
      Christopher S. 'coldacid' Charabaruk -- coldacid.net
    6. Re:Canadian = British = English != American by iantri · · Score: 1
      Well, I hate to break it to you, but that's not always true.

      As I pointed our earlier, we "colourize" films, not "colorize" or "colourise". Additionally, in my experience, that thing that moves you quickly and easily 20 storeys up a building is an "elevator", but that thing for disabled people in a 2 or 3 storey building is a "lift".

    7. Re:Canadian = British = English != American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You hit it on the head- I a lot of Canadians use both the British English and the yankee version too- not to mention throwing in some French (especially in areas close to Quebec or the Acadian regions in down east.)

      Case in point, I remember someone (American) writing in one of the GameGems books about some British terms, saying that one of them was slang for sex and the other for being drunk. Funny thing was, from growing up in central Ontario, they where used for either drinking OR having sex. Maybe says something "aboot" us :)

      Now let's not get started on giving a Canadian an American beer. :)

    8. Re:Canadian = British = English != American by hey · · Score: 1

      In Canada I would say its called a lift or elevator depending on if it is enclosed or not. Elevators are. Wheelchair raising platforms and fork lifts are not enclosed.

  39. Troll? by bigchris · · Score: 1

    I don't think so. Sounds remarkably informed to me!

  40. Re:Fools! by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

    I wasn't attacking you. Just directing my attention for people who don't get the concept of support yet. Let's start again!......

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
  41. Negative about OpenOffice by GreatDrok · · Score: 1
    From the article:
    But StarOffice faces increasing competition from other would-be Microsoft-killers, including OpenOffice, a free open-source package based on an early version of StarOffice.

    Since when was OpenOffice based on an early version of StarOffice. They're the same thing, if anything OpenOffice (I'm running 1.1.2 on my Mac and it is fabulous) is more up to date than StarOffice.

    Sometimes you have to wonder where these chumps get their information. The quoted statement puts down OpenOffice in the same way as saying that Netscape is in competition with Mozilla (Mozilla being based on an early version of Netscape). While strictly true, it distorts a positive attribute into something that appears negative.

    --
    "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
    1. Re:Negative about OpenOffice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, actually, Netscape is Mozilla currently, for the most part, so that's not really that good of an analogy. Besides, I believe that OOo *was* forked from StarOffice ages ago.

    2. Re:Negative about OpenOffice by GreatDrok · · Score: 1
      Um, actually, Netscape is Mozilla currently, for the most part, so that's not really that good of an analogy. Besides, I believe that OOo *was* forked from StarOffice ages ago.

      Actually, Netscape and StarOffice have the same relationship to their open source relatives. Mozilla is periodically forked to produce a new version of Netscape just as OpenOffice is periodically forked to produce a new version of StarOffice.

      --
      "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
    3. Re:Negative about OpenOffice by Anonytroll · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is true. The original StarOffice was sold by a German company. It was pretty famous for being able to run on most OSes of the time.
      Sun bought them out a few years later and opened the code. The OpenOffice code is based on this old StarOffice, even though today StarOffice is a derivate of OpenOffice.org.

    4. Re:Negative about OpenOffice by GreatDrok · · Score: 1
      It is true. The original StarOffice was sold by a German company. It was pretty famous for being able to run on most OSes of the time. Sun bought them out a few years later and opened the code. The OpenOffice code is based on this old StarOffice, even though today StarOffice is a derivate of OpenOffice.org.

      This is ancient history. Both StarOffice and OpenOffice today are derived from the same old version of StarOffice (SO5.2 was the last closed source version). As I said before the original article is an unnecessary put down of OpenOffice when you realise that StarOffice 6+ is a fork from the OpenOffice codebase. This is very similar to the current situation with Mozilla except that much more of the original Netscape code was dumped when they moved to Mozilla than was the case with StarOffice going to OpenOffice.

      --
      "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
  42. aboot by scsiiscs · · Score: 1

    as a canadian, i have to admit it's probably true. sure the way we say "about" sounds natural to us, but after you hear a couple of americans say "a-bay-ow-tuh" you have to wonder how our pronunciation sounds to them. and i used to think that the "eh" thing was just a stupid joke till i started noticing how much i do it myself. it's just that it's a purely verbal thing so it seems ridiculous when i see it written out. oh and one final thing: i assume that the original poster was aware, but staroffice (and most word processing software) does in fact have a Canadian English setting. We spell many words differently than Americans ("color" vs. "colour").

  43. Language packs? by bigchris · · Score: 1

    Exactly what language packs might they be referring to? There's no such thing for OOo, or even StarOffice AFAIK.

  44. And... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    How many people are going to be using those "advanced" features that are unique to Office? This is going into schools, it will probably be used on a very basic level that differs very little between different office suites. A word processor is a word processor. Font selection, size, maybe color, style, left justify, right, center, double space, etc. Our final in comp sci was to write a word processor in java. The basics are all the same on all programs on all platforms...

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:And... by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

      I've seen VB used in quite a few instances. Even in game development. It makes things quite easy when you can use a spreadsheet to manage the data, sort it, and change things in a very simple manner. Then you just use the vb code to export it to the format the game needs.

      I also have an AI teacher that demonstrated a neural network running in Excell.

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
  45. Parochial school boards by Jardine · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For those who may be confused as to why the Ministry of Education is signing deals for parochial school boards, Ontario has two seperate publicly funded education systems.

    There's what is now called the public system (used to be the Protestant system) and the Catholic system. Technically the Canadian constitution has a similar freedom of religion clause to the one in the US constitution which would prevent a publicly funded religious school system but the Ontario constitution also has a clause that allows for one. So we get two sets of school boards. Great fun.

    1. Re:Parochial school boards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And its fucking against international law. A court decided that the existence of the publicly funded catholic board discriminates against non-catholics. This is my biggest beef with canada.

      public money + popular cult = fucking wonderful

    2. Re:Parochial school boards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which court?

    3. Re:Parochial school boards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not a court. This.

      Back in 1999 and early 2000 the Ontario government got involved in a dispute with the federal government over a decision made by the UN Human Rights Committee. That committee ruled that Ontario's support of Catholic schools to the exclusion of other religious schools was discriminatory. The UN ruling resulted from a complaint lodged in 1996 by Toronto's Arieh Waldman, who had allegedly spent $95,000 educating his sons at Jewish day schools.
    4. Re:Parochial school boards by JohnnyCannuk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Uhmmm, not quite, but close.

      Firstly, you've got things WAY out of whack.

      First of all our public school system in Ontario is NOT and old protestant system. It has always been a public school system. It was created by Egerton Ryerson (name-sake for Ryerson University in Toronto) in the early 1840s, after the Rebellion of 1837. This public school system was created as part of the reforms brought in by Lafontaine and Baldwin to address the causes of the rebellion.

      So the public school system in Ontario is actually older than Canada itself. Religious schools did not recieve government funding.

      But during the negotiations for Confederation in 1867, Ontario (predominantly Protestant) agreed to publicly fund a Catholic school system and Quebec (predominantly Catholic) agreed to fund a separate Protestant system. These systems existance were and still are part of our constitution - the British North America Act (1867) (and now the Canada Act 1982). The only issues we have had have been around funding - Ontario would only fund the Catholic system up to grade 10 until 1984, when it funded it fully.

      Now, the section of the Contitution dealing with freedom of religion and separation of church and state was added as part of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982. So the original requirement for funded religious schools is still there until challenged by someone who will take it to the Supreme Court.

      One would think it would be easy to get rid of it, since Quebec no longer has Protestant schools - it now has public English and French systems. Even in Quebec, religious schools such as the Catholics must pay for their schools themselves.

      Now, as a father of two children of school age, I agree that our province should not be funding both a Catholic and Public system, both on the basis of expense AND on the basis that it give special status to the Catholic religion that no other religion enjoys (and no religion should enjoy special status). I'm quite sure this violates the separation of church and state, but the ability to challenge it has only been around for about 22 years. And the Catholics have a lot of votes in this province. Also, our Charter has specific provisions that state that it applies to the laws of Canada but not to the other sections of the Contitution itself, so even if it is declared in violation of the charter, the charter may not appply to the section of the old British North America Act that deal with this. It may actually take a contitutional amendmant to fix it (and we all know haow easy THAT is).

      So I agree that it is an idiotic system and we should put all of our money into a single, excellent public shcool system with no religious affiliations, but your simplistic explaination of it is just wrong. You need to see it in it's context to see how really silly it is.

      --
      Never by hatred has hatred been appeased, only by kindness - the Buddha
    5. Re:Parochial school boards by TheVidiot · · Score: 1

      Actually, Ontario has four publicly funded education systems: English public, English Catholic, French public and French Catholic. There are so few French people in Ontario that most are unaware of the existance of the French boards. That does not, however, prevent huge sums of money going to those French district school boards.

      Now that's waste!

    6. Re:Parochial school boards by j-beda · · Score: 1
      I'm quite sure this violates the separation of church and state...

      What "seperation of church and state" are you talking about? The US constitution says something about the gov not making religious laws, but Canada has no similar prohibition that I know of.

      Personally I think that neither the Catholics nor the non-Catholics are being that well served by having up to four publicly funded school boards in a region (French/English and Catholic/Non-Catholic), but I agree that changing things would be a heck of a tough thing to do. Other provinces have done so in the not-too-distant-past however.

    7. Re:Parochial school boards by j-beda · · Score: 1
      "There are so few French people in Ontario..."

      I think that there are almost as many Francaphones in Ontario (485,630) as there are Anglophones in Quebec (557,040) according to statscan. Granted the total population is about four times greater in ON.

      I think we can only call all of the money a "waste" if we can demonstrate that the extra boards are needlessly duplicating services that would be more efficiently delivered with a single board. I suspect that is the case, but it is not automatically so.

    8. Re:Parochial school boards by Jardine · · Score: 1

      What "seperation of church and state" are you talking about? The US constitution says something about the gov not making religious laws, but Canada has no similar prohibition that I know of.

      The part of the charter that says we have freedom of religion.

      Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
      a) freedom of conscience and religion;
      b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
      c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
      d) freedom of association.

      The US constitution is a little more clear in saying that "Congress shall make no laws respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" (not that that stops governments from trying), but the only way to really have freedom of religion is not to stop other's belief systems and not to force people to fund other religions through taxes.

    9. Re:Parochial school boards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Public money is the money of those catolics too. If they can't have their way of schooling then NO public money should go to any school PER SE. Be it religious or secular. I want total ban on any public money for education - public education is a disgrace. But members of "cursing cult" like yourself want a lot of public money spent - IN THEIR WAY ONLY. Of course the only solution to this problem is to stop funding the contested activity allthogether. I don't expect you to understand this though.

    10. Re:Parochial school boards by j-beda · · Score: 1
      It does not directly follow that freedom of religion implies that the state cannot fund a religion through taxes. Freedom of peaceful assembly does not imply that the state cannot fund a gathering that you do not want them to. There are many people who's thoughts, belief, opinion and expression directly oppose certain state sponsored activities, such as for example the military, yet the state can and does financially support them.

      Similarly freedom of expression does not prevent the state from promoting the use of english and french languages.

      Of course, if there were a court challenge, they could interpret freedom of religion more broadly and use it to prevent the state from "promoting" any particular religious views, but I do not think that that is a guaranteed outcome.

  46. Logo Computer by hey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Anybody remeber the "Logo" computer that was developed by the Ontario Ministry of Education. In the eary PC days. (No, I don't mean the Logo language.)

    1. Re:Logo Computer by ParisTG · · Score: 1

      Are you referring maybe to the ICON computer? It was a computer comissioned by the Ontario Government to be used in Ontario public schools. The above link has a lot more information.

    2. Re:Logo Computer by hey · · Score: 1
      Yes, that's it. Thanks.
      That site says they even had a Un*x:

      Unisys did continue to develop the "Iconix" operating system up to 1995 (Version 5) before they stopped its development.
    3. Re:Logo Computer by Kuad · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the "ICON". A 80186 running (I believe) an early version of QNX on the server side. Very familiar and very bizarre at the same time. I was going to bring it up as an example of the Ministry of Ed. having a history of dumb-assed decisions. Hope this one works out better.

    4. Re:Logo Computer by erikturk · · Score: 1

      It sure seemed like a strech of a decision when they decided to do it, but looking back, with an "OSS/(gnu-)linux" perspective, it seems kind of cutting edge. At least they didn't wait to see what Manitoba or PEI did before deciding. sig: sag

    5. Re:Logo Computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do remember the ICON computer- some kind of UNIX box IIRC. We did some LOGO programming on both it and the C64- the C64 has better features and graphics though :)

    6. Re:Logo Computer by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      ICON's did run some version of UNIX (that had a lot of NetWare'ish features tacked on as I recall). We had a lab of them in my high school.

      In retrospect they were actually a pretty cool setup, though we had no real software for them and the teachers had no idea what to do with them.

  47. Microsoft. Your Loss, Our Gain. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
    YES!!!! YES!!!! YES!!!!

    This is great news! Get a lot of people off of Microsoft's office suite, and get them on something else. Anything else! As long as people know that not all documents in existance (including classic literature and the Holy Bible) are written in Microsoft Word, and Excel isn't the only spreadsheet in existance.

    Not that I hate Microsoft. I really don't. But I think it should be shut down and its assets distributed among free software projects.

    Yeah yeah, mod this -100, Troll, I don't care. Nanny nanny boo boo, Microsoft. The only thing I regret about this is that StarOffice isn't the same as the free OpenOffice.org. But I guess Sun has to make money somehow. May as well be from productivity software.

    God Bless America.

    1. Re:Microsoft. Your Loss, Our Gain. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a bonehead. It's OK for Sun to make money, but not Microsoft, huh. Why? Does Microsoft make "too much" money?

      God bless America, indeed, that people like you don't get to make decisions like how much money is too much...

    2. Re:Microsoft. Your Loss, Our Gain. by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      It doesn't hurt that you can constantly change your operating system to cause other people's products to have problems. Or fail to share internals that are necessary for good performance. But, certainly, nothing like that had anything to do with the success of MS Office.

  48. Re:About Aboot by rush22 · · Score: 1

    my Canadian thoughts on the subject:

    Canada: "uh-beh-oot"
    US: "uh-bowt"

    At least I think that's where Americans get the 'oot' sound from :).

  49. Fabulous? Not likely! by NSash · · Score: 1

    (I'm running 1.1.2 on my Mac and it is fabulous)

    1.0.3 for X-Windows is ugly and unresponsive and a pain in the ass to use on a Mac. (Is it that much to ask to use CMD instead of CTRL?) Then again, since you're running a test release, I guess you're probably the kind of guy who wouldn't be particularly sensitive to these issues.

    I love OpenOffice for the PC, but a few more hours using the X version and I would have chucked my darling Mac through a window. I've given up on OpenOffice for the Mac until a native version is released.

  50. Loss to Wordperfect, not Word-OO, Uh oh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Open Office is also lacking all the nice extras that usually come with a word processor package. From clip art, to templates, to bigger dictionaries, and other reference materials (thesaurus, encyclopedia).

    It also comes with better documentation (try looking up forms for OO).

    ---
    "Sorry [just kidding], but according to our tests [which are better than our filters, honest], you are trying to post from an open HTTP proxy. [I would have succeeded too, if it wasn't for you meddling kids, and your dog too]"

  51. Latin grammar by NSash · · Score: 1

    in Latin, there is no distinction between in, on, into, or onto; all are denoted by the word in; everything else is in context.

    That's not true at all: it is determined by whether the indirect object is in the dative or accusative case.

    1. Re:Latin grammar by no+reason+to+be+here · · Score: 1

      Actually, "in" takes the ablative and the accusative, not the dative. Furthermore, the ablative and the accusative distinguish between in and on or into and onto, so the confusion still exist between in/on and into/onto. In addition to that, "in" can also mean at or among (for abl.) or to, towards, or against (for acc.), along with a host of other meanings. Moreover, there are no case distinctions in Italian, French, Spanish, et al. so there are still problems with "in" in those languages (I know that "in" in Italian means in, to, or at, for example).

    2. Re:Latin grammar by NSash · · Score: 1

      Actually, "in" takes the ablative and the accusative, not the dative.

      Gah! I must have been thinking of German.

      In any case, the part of your original statement that I took issue with was "in Latin, there is no distinction between in, on, into, or onto." Your post seems to indicate you have realized that this is not true.

  52. Re:Fabulous? Not likely! by GreatDrok · · Score: 1

    You should give the 1.1.2 test release a go. I couldn't use 1.0.3 sensibly as it was so slow and ugly; I used NeoOffice instead which was OK but still damn slow but it does use the CMD key correctly. 1.1.2 is so fast it is unreal, it starts as quickly as MS Office on OSX does. Yes, the interface is still X11, no it doesn't use CMD, but consider this:- I can now open a document on my 933 G4 iBook and be editing it in 10 seconds! It used to take nearly a 60 using 1.0.3 and that is frankly worth the extra hassle of dealing with CTRL. Oh, and it is also nice to have a version that is not only up to date with the Linux version, but is in fact ahead.

    --
    "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
  53. About aboot by rs79 · · Score: 1

    Ya dumb canuck. You probably say it yourself. Everybody here does but you can't notice it.

    I was born in the UK in 1957; we moved to Canada in 1964. I moved to Los Angeles in 1979 and was ridicules soundly for saying "aboot". After about a year I noticed I was doing it myself ans started saying "about" instead.

    I moved back to Canada in 1990 and noticed how everybody says "aboot". These days nobody seems to.

    Hmmmm.....

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
    1. Re:About aboot by bigbadwlf · · Score: 1

      I was born in the UK in 1957; we moved to Canada in 1964. I moved to Los Angeles in 1979 and was ridicules soundly for saying "aboot". After about a year I noticed I was doing it myself ans started saying "about" instead.

      So you've abandoned the Queen's Enlish in favour of speaking American?
      You must be proud to have learned to talk like a slack-jawed moron.

    2. Re:About aboot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be proud to have learned to talk like a slack-jawed moron.

      LOL! Score one for the corn cob up ass pommies!

      Oh, I'm sorry, exuberant expression isn't permitted unless you're in hooligan mode. My mistake..

  54. Picking on Canada? by gwoodrow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What can be said about this article but bravo? Whatever the reason may be - whether motivated by money or otherwise - it's a good choice. Anyone who works in the tech industry knows that the people who usually handle money and decisions regarding computing are usually clueless. Far too often they just throw money at Dell or Gateway and say "Send us school stuff." This indicates that there was actual research done and is a good sign that administrators may actually be catching up with the technology.

    On a side note, I must remark on all the Canada jokes. I myself am not Canadian, nor have I ever been there - but I find the jokes rather tired. Considering most of us that will be reading this spend our spare time INDOORS on COMPUTER TERMINALS while using terms like l33t and w00t!, I think we lack the necessary leverage to effectively make fun of any country or native persons of said country. Yes, that includes Canada. America Junior has just as much of a right to respect as we geeks do. Pocket protector jokes are just as tired for me as 'aboot' is for them, I'm sure.

    1. Re:Picking on Canada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, fiddle.

      Truth is the "blame Canada" vein through contemporary American humour has made sure most of your population at least know we exist. That's a big improvement over decades past.

      And most of us have a sense of humour. Those who don't... we'll help you take the piss out of them.

      But your "America Junior" crap is going to make me spit in your coffee though. That's oldtime Ugly American. Drop that and come visit. Beer's in the fridge.

    2. Re:Picking on Canada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pocket protector jokes are just as tired for me as 'aboot' is for them, I'm sure.

      No, it's not. I hate to say it but spending time in Vancover, the people in the bars are endlessly amused by the American perception of how they pronounce words. In fact, if you say you're an American, they'll flat out ask "What is this aboot thing abaut 'eh. We don't say aboot, we say say it just like you do, abAUt. 'Eh, we don't say 'eh, what is that abaut?"

      It's not funny because it's true, it's funny because they don't realize it's what they are saying.

  55. Those damn teachers by phliar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, why should teachers be paid more than plumbers? They only take care of our children, not toilets, which everyone knows are more important.

    --
    Unlimited growth == Cancer.
    1. Re:Those damn teachers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      You give fucking teachers more money and it reduces the status of status of scumsucking parasites important people who engage in corporate masturbation wealth creation.

      We know whats right and who's important and it's certainly not children attending public schools or their parents.

      Somehow the Republican party has managed the greatest PR stunt of all time, becoming a populist movement. A non-rich Republican is like a submissive lapping up their master's piss, but talk radio and helpless anger have taught those assholes to love the whip and so they do.

    2. Re:Those damn teachers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Think about that carefully. You'll take a lousy teacher over a lousy plumber any day of the week and you know it. Plumbers get paid more because they fix the immediate concern. Your child won't show the effect of lousy teachers until years later. But you saved a few bucks in the meantime and your toilet didn't overflow. And thats whats really important. Screw the children if you can't keep a female from running out of the house screaming.

    3. Re:Those damn teachers by Dashing+Leech · · Score: 1
      I don't think that was the point. Although I don't completely agree with the grandparent post, there is a valid point. If students are getting aren't getting a good education and you have limited funds, putting most of the increased funds into teachers salaries doesn't really improve their education any. What's a fair division between salaries and actual improvements to education? I don't know, but it's a valid questions. Increasing salaries does help get teachers paid what they're worth (as you suggest), but that still doesn't help the children much.

      Won't somebody please think of the children. (=

    4. Re:Those damn teachers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Screw the children if you can't keep a female"

      No wonder you're staying anonymous!

  56. I guess people like to pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Gee, why do they need to buy or license star office when Open office is FREE - yep, they can download it for _FREE_ as in no cash, no mula, nada.

    Maybe that's why Microsoft is making so much money, because they charge an arm and a leg. Yep - since it is expensive, it must be _GOOD_

    1. Re:I guess people like to pay by wolftone · · Score: 1

      why do they need to buy or license star office when Open office is FREE

      Star Office Education Solution

      To quote from the page,

      "This institutional license is available for the cost of media only - no other licensing fees apply. All you have to do to obtain a site license is purchase at least one media kit or download the software"

      The difference for the school district between OOo (which, if you wanted to buy a cd, would cost around 10USD) and StarOffice (media kit for 25USD) is a matter of the price of the media. They would be able to download both for free.

      I personally prefer OOo. I find that it seems to integrate with Debian a bit better (helps that .deb package binaries are available) than SO, and OOo seems faster to me. I notice no difference in usability between the two, and have not found myself needing any of the obscure features that SO has that OOo doesn't. I can definitely understand, though, the desire for an institution to prefer a supported product.

    2. Re:I guess people like to pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Gee, why do they need to buy or license star office when Open office is FREE - yep, they can download it for _FREE_ as in no cash, no mula, nada.

      Well golly gee. You've solved everyone's problem. Now if only you had:

      1) taken into account the fact that, in the StarOffice license agreement, it specifically says that it's free for educational use

      2) taken into account that there would actually be a need for support, documents, CDs, etc. in order to actually outfit (and support/maintain) the ~5000 schools in Ontario

      (Surprise, surprise, but not every school's computer is networked, and not every one has their own in-house IT worker. In fact, there's usually only a couple of IT workers per school *board*, with some boards covering regions that are larger than some U.S. states. Deployment for an installation as diverse [geographically, worker-wise, and in terms of computer setups] requires more of a support contract than what simple open source can offer, IMO.)

  57. Sure, that's wonderful but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just how will we be able to get a purchase order approved for the small cost of the media? My collegues in Ontario Colleges can also get access to educational copies of Star Office. From what I understand each campus or facility is entitled to order one copy of the media and the chances that it is even approved are next to nil. It's also a problem if someone has already ordered the single media copy which makes it unavailable to anyone else to order or access...

    concerned teacher in Ontario...

  58. You appear to be writing a letter! by Moonpie+Madness · · Score: 2, Funny

    OfficeStar assistance can help you. What is the letter aboot? ____________________________________ ( OK ) ( Cancel )

  59. only StarOffice? by latroM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder if they have same kind of a setup than in my school where both M$ Office and StarOffice are installed. Microsoft provides very cheap school agreements so there isn't a big incentive to choose only StarOffice. And guess which one of the office suites is used primarily in my school.

  60. Just because it's licensed... by myov · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... doesn't mean they'll use it. The TCDSB (Toronto Catholic school board) IT department is so pro-microsoft that even anything Mac related was not supported. Even when it had to do with cross-platform software like FileMaker (used for elementary report cards, and owned by APPLE!) IMHO, the policy was reversed only because schools were buying Macs out of their own budgets for media use/etc.

    Their student information system (Trillium), developed either by the Ministry of Education, or at least by a few school boards, runs on Microsoft (SQL server with a horribly written front end, most likely in VB). The alternative (Oracle) wasn't well supported IIRC.

    The grade 9 "intro to computer" and compsci courses are taught with Office & VB and from what I've seen tend to focus on learning those programs, not the general concepts.
    (Where would I be if I focused on learning the 1993 version of Works, rather than generic database/spreadsheet concepts?)

    Finally, if nothing else, their education agreement probably ensures that licensing is cheap enough and/or forced on every machine, or prevents them from installing competing software.

    --
    I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
    1. Re:Just because it's licensed... by tzanger · · Score: 1

      I hear ya.

      The high school I went to has a couple of computer labs purchased entirely by Microsoft -- all decent machines, office, Win2k, the whole thing... An agreement to license SO doesn't mean a whole lot, unfortunately.

    2. Re:Just because it's licensed... by mckayc · · Score: 1

      I went to high school in Toronto and for my grade 11 computer course we used frickin' Turing. TURING!

      But, in hindsight, it was actually pretty good at teaching basic programming concepts and pretty fun to use.

    3. Re:Just because it's licensed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep...the CD's will arrive from the Ministry of Education and will be stored away on a shelf in the back room of IT departments in school board offices beside the ministry-licensed Corel WordPerfect Suite disks that aren't being used either. Although the ministry may be providing licenses for these alternative office suites, Ontario schools are forced by government requirements to purchase and use MS Office for administrative purposes. Ontario school boards are required to use Word and Excel file formats for all correspondance and reporting with provincial government ministries - and thanks to the use of some special VBA sauce in many of the ministry-provided Excel reports and Word forms we are required to used, nothing other than the genuine M$ product will work.
      Naturally M$ offers some very generous SA and Select agreements for boards that wish to use Office on both admin and classroom computers. And, of course once you have to install M$ Office on every admin computer in the school board, it is much easier to standardize on supporting just one office suite for both admin and classroom computers.

    4. Re:Just because it's licensed... by myov · · Score: 1

      I think everyone in Toronto used Turing. I actually hit the stack limit one year, and I couldn't actually add any more characters or it refused to compile. (Take that U of T! :-) )

      The important thing is that I was able to apply the turing knowledge to C/Java/etc. The languages I use now probably won't be around much in 10 years. When you teach specifics rather than concepts, the information is useless.

      Do I need to remember that Works used F2 to search? No. Do I need to know what a record, table and query are? Of course.

      If StarOffice doesn't act EXACTLY like Office, then many people won't be able to adapt. It's not because they don't know that Spell Check exists, it's because they only know it as F8.

      --
      I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
    5. Re:Just because it's licensed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think everyone in Toronto used Turing.
      No: my school used QuickBASIC. I made sure to avoid all high school computer courses.
  61. Re:Fabulous? Not likely! by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 1

    The Ximianized 1.1.2 version is quite swift. Ok, I have an XP3200, but it's quite usable on an old P3 450.

  62. Question... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 3, Interesting
    When you send people the link to download OOo, what's their reaction?

    How about sending the file in PDF format?

    1. Re:Question... by bstadil · · Score: 1

      Mostly friends and family so decent response. I do use pdf but a 50k .sxw file swells to 250k or so. Additionally I like to get files that I can work with. If I get a pdf of a spreadsheet I can only look at it. If I get an .xls or .swc file I can play around with the data, helping me understand it better.

      --
      Help fight continental drift.
  63. XML will be an option ? by foobsr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not really yet ready though.

    Generating Word documents using XSLT

    Thinking XML

    Opening Open Formats with XSLT

    Office 2003 XML Reference Schemas Overview

    Why You Should Choose MS Office Over OO.org

    Why not complicate a complicated world a little more. Each standard unit of complication renders X standard monetary units in someones pockets.

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
  64. Old News by Canuckanuck · · Score: 1

    I used to wonder why /.ers would complain about the bias and censorship of the overlords who control this news forum, now I know why.

    I submitted this story a week and a half ago and it was rejected. Now an AC submits it and gets the credit. Bastards.

    http://slashdot.org/~Canuckanuck

  65. Canadian English spellchecker by Trickster+Coyote · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can download the Canadian English (or even NZ or Australian English) spellchecker dictionary for OpenOffice / Star Office from this location.

    Dictionaries for several dozen other languages are also available. Includes some that probably aren't available for MS Word - Moari, Faroese, Setswana, Zulu, etc.

    --
    Ideology is for ideots.
  66. Re:Fabulous? Not likely! by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 1

    it was ugly and unresponsive in other platforms as well.

    i'm trying to understand why the only "stable" OOo for mac is still 1.0.3 while for other platforms it's already 1.1.1. doesn't apple have some kind of internal program to build up-to-date native (non-X11) versions of OOo ?

    --
    What ? Me, worry ?
  67. switch from Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, most of the schools were running WordPerfect, although the decision was usually made at a board or district level, so there were undoubtedly exceptions.

  68. Corel is the Loser in this Deal by frank249 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For many years the Ontario Teacher's pension fund was a major investor in Corel and Corel basically offered WordPerfect for free to Ontario schools. When Corel was stolen by Vector the pension fund lost over $500 mil. Now with no reason for a special relationship and with the WordPerfect - Student/Teacher version costing $99 and it makes sense that the Board of Education would look for a better deal. Bill Gates and Vector(owners of Corel) probally thought this would force the schools over to MS Office but in this case it back fired on them.

    --

    Today's vices may be tomorrow's virtues.

  69. Our situation by wirehead78 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am the sysadmin for a private, non-profit k-12 in upstate NY. We operate on a shoestring budget. This year we spent thousdands of dollars to license Office 2000 for about 50 computers. I had mentioned to the Principal about using OpenOffice or some other open source suite, which would obviously be free. He was concerned that in the "real world" people use MS Office and the students would have a hard time working between different versions. Also the same problem currently existed because many of the students had MS Office at home. So the idea was shot down after only a few seconds. I didn't know how to convince him otherwise.

    1. Re:Our situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The goal of K-12 is not to teach how to use a product (at least I hope that's not the goal). Its to teach more broad concepts which can be applied across industries. Otherwise schools would be teaching students how to say "would you like to supersize that order" instead of "communications" if product detail were the concern.

      I am sure students know what "File->Save" means. I am sure students know what "Align->Center" means. Now they know how to use both MS Office and Open Office.

    2. Re:Our situation by signingis · · Score: 1

      You could have started with a simple demo by either installing it on a workstation or just booting his workstation off of a knoppix or some other live-CD distro and trying some test files. Not to mention that you could demo the PDF generation.

      --

      I prefer a void in conversation to a vacuous one.
    3. Re:Our situation by sql*kitten · · Score: 1
      He was concerned that in the "real world" people use MS Office and the students would have a hard time working between different versions.

      Your principal is an idiot.
      1. By the time any of his students start work, there'll be a whole 'nother version out anyway
      2. StarOffice isn't that dissimilar to MS Office for basic tasks, if you can use one you can use the other with ease
      3. The purpose of his school is no more to each kids how to word process than it is to teach them to sharpen pencils. It's what they write that matters.
    4. Re:Our situation by mikael · · Score: 1

      Also the same problem currently existed because many of the students had MS Office at home. So the idea was shot down after only a few seconds. I didn't know how to convince him otherwise.

      Tell him that many of the students have OpenOffice at home.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  70. I met a Canadian once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She swore that nobody said "aboot", and when I got her to say "about" she was careful to pronounce the "ou" like "ow". But when she was just talking quickly, or even just saying something like "house", I could definitely hear it. It's more like Hose (with the s pronounced s not z).

    I bet New Zealanders dont think they pronounce "then", "chips", or "six" funny either. ("thun", "chups", and "sux".. hmm you just have to hear it).

    Disclaimer: I'm Australian, so giving New Zealanders shit is one of our favourite past times.

  71. This could be huge one day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not only does Ontario have a multitude of high schools...they also have several world-class Universities. University of Toronto, University of Waterloo, Queens, and McMaster are just naming a few. I myself go to U of Waterloo and I know that in our engineering labs we're given the choice of using either OpenOffice or MS Office (forced to use OpenOffice in some of the lower budget labs). Now who attends Ontario Universities? Ontario students! If these students develop a preference for Star/OpenOffice, it's likely that you'll start to see MS Word disappear from our institutions of higher learning. Once you have everyone familiar with StarOffice and Netscape 7.x (it's offered as an alternative to IE on all school machines, despite the fact it's clunky as sin), a full switch to a Linux-based environment is just a hop, skip and a jump away. Now if only some of the more specializing companies made linux ports of their software.

    1. Re:This could be huge one day by nulltransfer · · Score: 1
      Actually, UW Engineering also has Wordperfect.. I've seen it around in the Helix labs...

      As I mentioned in another post, not everybody likes using OpenOffice.org since they feel more secure using Office... this especially goes for the non-technical students...

      --

      My dog ate my sig
    2. Re:This could be huge one day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in a small town in New Brunswick Canada and i know that at least one of the schools in our district runs Red Hat and Star Office on the desktops. It was a test project and apparantly it worked pretty well but scince my school is upgading a mess of systems running windows 95A&B, 98&98SE, 2k and XP to windows 2000 pro (except for the xp machines) and they're running Windows Server 2003 on the server with active directory I don't think we'll be getting Linux or even open office (still on office 97) oh if anyone here is still in high school if you help the technicians you get stuff yah admin passwords and 2 GB network drive to everyone elses 20Mb

    3. Re:This could be huge one day by kryptkpr · · Score: 1

      I second that.. McMaster's engineering and science labs sport a wide variety of software, including OpenOffice.

      What blew me away the first time I logged onto the engineering lab's computers was that right alongside MS VC++, in the Development Tools folder, there was a FreePascal installation ready to be used!

      Ontario's universities are definitely embracing open source, which is good, as it means my ever-increasing tuition is going somewhere other then into bill's pocket.

      --
      DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
  72. ICON 31337 by coirec · · Score: 1

    I got suspended for "hacking" the o_teacher account in Grade 7. I think that was about as angry as I saw Mr. E that year. Of course, the password was something like "secret" or not set or something. They were relying (as far as I could tell) on not publishing the login for the teachers' account. The student account was o_student, so it wasn't much of a leap.

  73. Differing Preferences by nulltransfer · · Score: 1
    At my university in Ontario, we are using three office suites: Microsoft Office, Corel Wordperfect, and OpenOffice.org..

    I was talking to one of the admins on why we don't just go with OO.o, and he agreed with me. Except that a few of the profs were big endorsers of already-popular standards and wanted everybody to use Office. Some other profs preferred Wordperfect, so we had to have that installed on the machines as well...

    Recently, our student union had opted to use open-source software wherever reasonable, but this caused a bit of backlash from the non-technical students that wanted to keep using Office and thought that using open-source would give them less freedom of choice. (which I find to be ironic)

    It's hard to keep with one method of doing things when everybody's opinion is different. I'm not sure if this will affect my university, but it'll be interesting to see what happens...

    --

    My dog ate my sig
  74. Don't assume that MS is compatible with MS by dpm · · Score: 1

    I had a client who needed a Word document, so I created it in OpenOffice -- it was almost OK, but there were a few minor formatting problems.

    I decided that it wasn't fair to inflict problems on my customer just because of my personal OSS beliefs, so I booted into Windows, dusted off the virtual cobwebs (I sometimes go six months without choosing Windows in LILO), and recreated the same document using MS Word.

    This time, the formatting problems were worse on my customer's computer, even though the document was fine in MS Word on my box. I decided to stick with the OO version, since it was more compatible with Word.

  75. I've said it before... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

    Outside the US Microsoft is toast.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:I've said it before... by Shai-kun · · Score: 1

      Mmm... Toast.

      --
      ...or so I've been told.
  76. I Got Shafted by Etriaph · · Score: 0
    When I was in High School here in Ottawa, Ontario, we were learning to perform word-processing tasks with WordPerfect 5.1. Now, for those of you who were fortunate enough to not have to learn WP51, I can tell you that the blue screen could drive anyone mad.

    If I was able to use Star Office in High School though, I probably wouldn't have learned to type so quickly due to having to memorize arcane keystrokes.

    Well, then again, there was always IRC. :)

    --
    "It's here, but no one wants it." - The Sugar Speaker
    1. Re:I Got Shafted by serbanp · · Score: 1
      You're wrong on two accounts: first, you don't know what you know and second that what you know is very good knowledge :-)

      The fact is WP5.1 was an amazing word-processor, capable of dealing, with very limited resources and in a very precise way, with very large and complex documents. Something that MSWord was never (and still isn't) capable of.

      To use WP5.1, you actually had to learn a little bit of typesetting, something that is derided these days, in the name of cuteness and visual glitter.

      Therefore, you don't yet know how fortunate you were to actually learn something from your bruising with WP5.1 !

      Serban

  77. OpenOffice lacks WP import filters... by danny · · Score: 1
    They could be in for a shock -- I don't know about Star Office, but OpenOffice doesn't have import filters for Word Perfect documents! There is a request for enhancement, of course...

    Danny.

    --
    I have written over 900 book reviews
    1. Re:OpenOffice lacks WP import filters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I bought SO (v6.0) it didn't have WP filters either, although the feature was touted all over their website.

  78. Uninformed by mfh · · Score: 1

    > The amount of corruption and waste that was left behind by the NDP was grotesque, the Tories were just cleaning that up.

    This is a totally uninformed viewpoint. The Tories cut education until there was no meat left, only bone and gristle. The NDP tried desperately to fufuil promises when they were elected, and they did for the most part. The NDP has a better track record than the Tories or the Liberals.

    > Cutting the budget forces the corruption to shrink so it doesn't get discovered.

    Again, you are completely in the dark. The less money that is available, the greater the corruption and crime, in any organization. The more money that is available to educators, the better the morale and effectiveness of teachers!

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Uninformed by subVorkian · · Score: 1

      The amount of corruption and waste that was left behind by the NDP was grotesque, the Tories were just cleaning that up.
      This is a totally uninformed viewpoint. The Tories cut education until there was no meat left, only bone and gristle. The NDP tried desperately to fufuil promises when they were elected, and they did for the most part. The NDP has a better track record than the Tories or the Liberals.


      Not to make this a regional dispute, but there was plenty of waste when the NDP were in power. The Conservatives help remove some of this waste. Take a look at the facilities that the Durham Board of Education built under the NDP's government. Complete with expansive marble foyer and private showers and exercise facilities for board members. The sad truth is, when there is more money for educators, the more waste there will be.
  79. No, it doesn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "will see the application suite used by 2.5 million students. "

    The Ministry of Education signs all sorts of licences on behalf of the Boards for all sorts of software. It most emphatically does NOT mean that the software will be used ... let alone used by 2.5 million students. It probably won't even be available for use by some/many/most of those 2.5 million students since the suite will have to be installed and many boards simply don't have the manpower to do the install let alone provide on-going support, maintenance, training and upgrades.

  80. Costs To Schools = Zero by SoVi3t · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, almost. My father worked for the Board of Education about a decade ago, give or take, and when a move was made for C++ to be used instead of QBASIC (yes, that was how bad our education system was), Microsoft made the offer of "it's free for you to use, and no licensing fees....as long as nothing ever gets released." So basically if anybody wanted to make something and then release it (a game, an app, etc), they had to consult with MS first.

    --
    Defender of Microsoft and Communism!!!
  81. Not the first and hopefully not the last. by WgT2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Dallas Independent School District, serving Dallas, Texas, has had a site licence for Star Office for more than a year now. [From 1999-2000 stats] there are more than 200 schools in the district servering more than 150,000 students (here and here)

    They obtained the licence for the purpose of distributing it on the laptops they supplied their teachers (1,000+). I heard a figure on how much it cost, but it was not from an authoritive source. If the figure is true, then the savings over MS Office was in the hundreds of thousands of dollars (read: > $500,000.00+).

    Star Office is a wise move for any public institution spending tax-payer monies.

    1. Re:Not the first and hopefully not the last. by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Academic (Student/Teacher) version of Microsoft Office is only about $130 at Staples. That means savings of about $130,000. Of course, Star Office includes a database program.

    2. Re:Not the first and hopefully not the last. by WgT2 · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm. Not in or worked for a school district that has been tight in its buget lately, have you?

      Besides, the implication from my source was that they wanted the full version of MS Office for their teachers and ended up with a site licence from Sun.

  82. Laval school board... by jpbelang · · Score: 1

    ...has standardized on Open Office, I think.

    Money starved, large governmental institutions might actually be the first with the clout and incentive to massively move away from MSOffice.

    --
    JP http://www.wearerite.com
  83. Big Schools by Jason+Hood · · Score: 1

    will see the application suite used by 2.5 million students. No word on whether it ships with 'Canadian English' pack 2.5 mil kids / 72 schools. 34, 722 kids per school. Those must be some big schools.

    --
    Are you intolerant of intolerant people?
    1. Re:Big Schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You dunce, that's 72 school districts. Most districts have more than one school. Some districts have lots of schools. Damn, this is complicated. Are you following?

    2. Re:Big Schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      2.5 mil kids / 72 schools. 34,722 kids per school. Those must be some big schools.
      72 school boards -- not schools.
  84. Apple is missing the boat - Support OO Port to OSX by JPyObjC+Dude · · Score: 1

    It's funny that the only thing that would keep me from suggesting OSX to a large school board is always the office suite. For moral and bug related issues, I would never sugges M$ Office Mac. Open Office currently running through an X11 layer and as such has very poor printing support. As such, I could never recommend it either.

    In the past, Apple has never gotten on board with the OO / Star Office community. If they did, we would already have a native port. Instead, we must wait for a wonderful group of non Applers who are coding their eyes out to build something that Apple would greatly benefit from.

    Come on Apple, make the right decision and ignore what those M$ board members are saying. Support OO) and help them accelerate the 2.0 native release timeline. The payback will be recovered 10 fold.

    JD

    BTW - I am and have been an avid OSX user and supporter. It's the only home machine I recommend to anybody (except hard-core gamers) as their home machine.

  85. Re:Mac OS X native: NeoOffice/J by MarkWatson · · Score: 1
    Here is the download link for NeoOffice/J that uses Java for UI rendering.

    Sounds strange, but it works well!

    I wrote a blog entry in NeoOffice/J.

    -Mark

  86. why StarOffice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm currently a grade 10 student in ontario...
    in our school, we have a few office applications that we can use on the school computers, and our laptops with the school image. Mainly we use Micsoft Office 2000 on desktops and 2002 on newer laptops. We also have Claris Wroks 5.0 on our LAN, which some students prefer to use over MS office...why? that's beyond me. We can also have Corel.

    As you can see, we have quite a few "office" application to use, so why do they need to spend more for these type of application? Can't we just stick with MS office. They don't even have to upgrade to the newest version. Just stick with office 2002 for a few more year! I can't see staff and students switching to Staroffice all the sudden since the majority use Microsoft. Unless they remove microsoft office from the system, i don't think anyone would use staroffice. And why startoffice? what about openoffice? It's quite good(not as good as MS tho) and it's FREE!!

  87. The Politics of Open Source by webzombie · · Score: 1

    I have always felt that publically funded schools at all levels should be using as much Open Source software as possible.

    As a parent I'm always concerned when I see course desciptions like "Cisco Networking" and "Microsoft Business Applications". In fact we should be insisting on similar courses for Open Source software like Linux and Open Office.

    Public information should never be tied to any sort of proprietary software be it an OS and especially not a particular application like MS Word.

    And BTW... The Calgary Flames won the Stanley Cup on Saturday but appartently the Americans officials were too stupid to operate the "sophistamacated" video who jiggies! Then came up with some bullshit rule that seemed to be dreamed up on the fly to explain their obvious bias! Its our game and our cup and by god will have them back... send in Terrance and Philip :-)

  88. Excellent first step by Stone316 · · Score: 1

    It doesn't matter why the Ontario school board chose StarOffice... Personally, I think the key to software is getting people familiar with your product. The more familiar you are with it, the more likely you will use it in the future. In university I used Word Perfect.. Why? Because thats what my university bought..So what did I use at home and buy? Word Perfect. Its the same reason why I think most software companies should make their products free (or very cheap) for personal use. Because it gives them a foot hold and base to grow from. If your company is evaluating new software products, which one are they going to use? Something they haven't seen before or one that a couple of people had installed at home because it was free? The more people that use openoffice/staroffice, the better chance they will try other opensource products. Once these users hit a critical mass Microsoft will be forced to open up their formats or support formats uses with openoffice. These schools may find it easier as well to migrate their OS to linux. Anyways, I only see this as a good thing.. I guess there are some people that just look at the bad side of everything.

    --
    "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
  89. Let's All Cluster F* Microsoft... by hoggoth · · Score: 1

    When I used to play Risk years ago, the same scenario would play out again and again. Once someone became the undisputed power ruling over the map, all of the little players would gang up and work together to decimate the big power. They would do this even at the cost of killing themselves.

    Now, I'm not saying the Microsoft isn't evil. It is. It's abusive paranoid way of doing business is... not nice to say the least.

    But I just think it's interesting to watch all the other players like IBM and Sun doing anything they can to bring down the 'big guy' at any cost. Even if it means spending their resources developing things and giving them away at no profit to themselves.

    I think Cringley said it best recently that the only way to beat Microsoft is to NOT focus your efforts and plans as "against Microsoft" in a reactionary way, but to instead focus on "being great" as if Microsoft didn't exist, as Google seems to be doing.

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  90. Good use of school resources. by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
    You might at least show the school board the move forward in Ontario and point out StarOffice. Moving to StarOffice or OpenOffice would be a matter of days as it can be done completely independent of the underlying platform.

    There are already Danish and Swedish translations of OpenOffice Perhaps a class project could be to take a crack at bokmål, nynorsk or sami gielli depending on your geographic location. Some of these are already under way.

    I'm surprised that any particular U.S. company would be allowed to dictate the terms of Norwegian education. Especially for products that are notoriously expensive and high maintenance.

    60 workstations can be a lot of money thrown into the sea if they are expensive and high maintenance. It might be a good time to point out that there are more local options, like Skolelinux, which are lower maintenance.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    1. Re:Good use of school resources. by Orgazmus · · Score: 0

      I have had a talk with the IT admin, and the principal.. Skolelinux/Openoffice is no go :\

      --
      The system had the verbosity of HTML combined with all the readability of compiled assembly viewed as bitmap images
  91. Re:Our situation - been there... by Chordonblue · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Been there and done that my friend. Here's the reasons I put forth:

    1) Take a look through history - that's the 'real world'. Has it ALWAYS been MS Windows Office? I'll bet not. In fact, I'll bet it's been Wordperfect for DOS and Windows, Xywrite, Word for DOS and Windows, etc. The fact is that computer software evolves quickly, and your principal needs to get over it.

    First and foremost, educational facilities shouldn't be pushing a particular brand 'X' software either, particularly from a company convicted of monopolistic practices. Most of what needs to be done in OOo is completely translatable to Word or Wordperfect with minimal effort.

    2) Everyone DOES NOT have MS Office at home. That's a crock. What versions might they have - it matters. Do you realize that many people buying a Dell now are getting Wordperfect as a default office suite? What about older, incompatible versions of MS Office? .DOC is hardly a 'standard' just ask anyone whose tried to convert old 'Works' documents.

    3) Win over the STAFF and get it in their homes. Let the staff see OOo in operation. Find out what their objections are (there will be some). Eliminate the unrealistic ones. Point out the advantages (they get a free copy, PDF/Flash support, etc.)

    4) OOo or StarOffice is great and has been terrific for us because of standardization. Every student, teacher, and staff member uses it and guess what? Everything just works. No document incompatibilities because one document was formatted for someone else's printer. No issues with international characters. No licensing issues.

    5) Which staff member was willing to take a pay cut to help finance Microsoft? That's the question I posed and what it was coming down to at the time. We were really in serious straights three years ago financially and things were tight. Money ended up being a prime motivator, but the software has proven itself over time.

    Feel free to shoot me an email if you'd like to discuss this further. I'm also the tech coordinator of a small all-girls private school here in PA. We converted to StarOffice/OOo three years ago and haven't looked back.

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  92. Canadian Ministry workings by thunderpeel · · Score: 1

    I deal with many of the Canadian Ministries and all I can say is ...

    Congrats to StarOffice, too bad it will be something else in 2-4 years.

    I can not tell you how many times I have gone into a ministry (health, edu, trans, finance) and they are implementing a "new solution" to a "problem". I use M$ product in the front end because it is what my people are "used" to using. Something so much as a change in GUI and they will go crazy.

    I would love nothing more than to implement OpenSource widely into my environment, I have tried to have users "try" different OpenSource offerings, however, they just don't get it. If it isnt their usual looking desktop forget it. Panic, fear and an overall stupidity overcome them.

    "Where is word?", "well, you can use this program", "Is it word?", "no, but it is like word", "oh, can you install word?", "ugh"

    Another issue I think will arise out of this is attachments. My company deals heavily in sales and procurement and without a common word processor document format, the government will spend more money on front end office support than if they had of bought into the devil.

    If your average user actually knew how to use a computer properly M$ wouldn't have this grip. Train people on how to use a computer not how to use an appliance.

    Anyways, give'em heck guys.

    --
    I really do know KungFu .. ..
  93. This is not new and it doesn't solve anything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 1998, the Ministry did a similar deal with Corel (Here's the link: www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/document/nr/98.04/corel.html ) The bottom line is that nothing came of it. I never saw WordPerfect actually get adopted in school boards. I think the same thing will happen here. The IT weasels and back-room MS deals go on despite these grand deals made by the Ministry. School boards choose the software they run. They are not in any way mandated to use StarOffice. Also, budgets are not the issue. Take it from me, I am fighting hard to get Open Source looked at as an alternative. AFAIKT, resistance is (almost) futile. The biggest issue here is that Microsoft HAS to be in front of kids in order to get market share. M$ will do ANYTHING to keep M$Office on school computers. Like cigarettes, if you start 'em young, you've got 'em hooked for life. That's what we're up against. I just hope I can be proven wrong.

  94. OpenOffice.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both my parents are school teachers in this province and were given CDs of site licensed utilities and open source software by their IT dept. last september including copies of OpenOffice.

  95. Re:Fabulous? Not likely! by MarkWatson · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the tip! I just upgraded to the test OOo 1.1.2 fix1 version and it really is fast!

    I will still keep NeoOffice/J around though.

    BTW, I have written 2 of my last 3 published books using OOo. (Using Word to check and re-write the files just before sending to my publishers).

    -Mark

  96. Where's the Insentive by Psymunn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why become a teacher if you don't get payed well? Up here, in vancouver, thanks to unions, you can get payed just as much to be the shcool janitor AND you save yourself 5 years in college. This of course is two sperate problems rolled into one (skilled workers getting payed to little, unskilled workers getting payed to much) but it essentially means that, you are better off not getting a degree and working as a care aid or janitor, OR getting a degree in a trade or business. So why would you teach? The only people who go into teaching now are idealists who want to make the world a better place and it isn't long before they become jaded by the school system.
    We need to give teachers a salary proportional to the work and skill that was required to get the job not just to keep them happy but to attract a wider range of candidates

    --
    The Neo-Bohemian Techno-Socialist
    1. Re:Where's the Insentive by Dashing+Leech · · Score: 1
      This is a nice statement, and has its own valid point that I do agree with, but it just restates the post 3 levels above that I already commented on, and you didn't comment on that point.

      Sure, there's validity to your statement. But also some incorrect assumptions. Hell, I have a PhD in Engineering and there are bus drivers who make more than me. Plumbers have a higher salary than I did and some make more than I do now after 5 years of work.

      You make the incorrect assumption, as do many people, that salary is (or should be) based off of years of study. This is obviously not true, though a lot of people would like it to be (such as me). Salary is based on a wide range of factors of which study period is a small one. The difficulty of the field is another. However, a more important factor is supply and demand. Yes, unions do skew it because they create a "union" factor which drives salary as a function of "strong arming" rather than functions of a real market.

      But the original point is still valid. If the public puts more money into education, they'd like to see some improvement in the actual education, not just increased salaries to which they don't seen much direct benefit.

      It's not a black and white issue, and is difficult to solve.

    2. Re:Where's the Insentive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why become a teacher if you don't get payed well?

      get payed just as much to be the shcool janitor

      sperate

      payed payed payed

      Plus bonus scare commas: you know, the kind that you pop in because you sentence has been going on for a while and you're scared that it will explode if it doesn't get a chance to take a breath soon.

      I sure as hell hope your teachers didn't get paid too much, because they did a really crap job.

  97. You are a moron. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Training" in any stupid app that requires no knowledge or skill to use will not get you a job. There are no job openings for wordologists, knowing how to use one app isn't getting you a job. And if you are so stupid that you can't apply what you know about one app to an almost identical app, your job opportunities do not involve computers anyways.

    My mom uses office at work and openoffice at home and required no "training" to be able to switch between them. We are talking about someone who can't burn a cd without help, and has to get someone to install programs for her. If you are below that level, stick to flipping burgers.

  98. Re:Our situation - been there... by wirehead78 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, these are very good points. The problem is that we have government funds to spend, and had a deadline. We had to make a fast decision, and it was decided to purchase Office. If I had had more time I would have attempted to make a more convincing case. I will keep these points in mind the next time something comes up.

    Already I have replaced a W2K server with RH9/Samba, which is working out very well. And I am in the process of integrating Mozilla (or FireFox) and Thunderbird instead of IE and Outlook. Most of the staff doesn't care, as long as it works. So I'm all about open source solutions.

    I have a couple of teachers "test driving" complete Linux desktops.

    Are there any good open source anti-virus programs out there? We could sure use one.

  99. Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PC Load Letter

  100. StarOffice sucks ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just try using autonumbering of headings and find out how ridiculous the software is.

  101. Do Not Pass Go ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good for those Canucks, someone needs to give Gates a run for his money. He has Boardwalk, Parkplace, all the Greens and all four damn railroads. There's no competing for us Baltics and Mediterraneans.

  102. I avoid convicted, unrepentant, criminals.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    .... when doing business.

    Just common sense.

    I don't understand why there are so many people willing to ignore common sense (hint: you'll be screwed) with the shaky explanation of "hey their wares are good enough".

    Most incredible the wares in offer very often are not good enough, actaully are crap, but the fanboys are like deer blinded by the headlights of the MS marketing propaganda.

    Another hint: blinded deer tend to be run over.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  103. Re:Our situation - been there... by ahodgson · · Score: 1

    Are there any good open source anti-virus programs out there? We could sure use one.

    http://www.clamav.net/

  104. So? What's you point? by brunes69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You realize there are more than two parties you know.

    I am pissed off at the Liberals too, but I am defiantly not going to help voting in a homo-phobic, anti-abortion right-wing wacko. I am voting NDP. And I would strongly urge any Canadian who values civil rights to do the same.

    1. Re:So? What's you point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes the alternative a "wacko"? Inquiring minds want to know. Put up or shut up, sir.

    2. Re:So? What's you point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you have obviously not spent any time looking at the NDP policies... thay make the Patriot Act look like an NAACP manifesto....

  105. Sweet sweet salvation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go go staroffice! :D

    I seriously hope this does go into effect at my school, because we've actually got MS and Corel stuff.

  106. Yeah, you are! Uninformed that is. by snarkasaurus · · Score: 1

    With a view like that, you MUST be an NDP'er, right?

    How without a clue can you get? If there is lots of money flying around, unscrupulous people find ways for it to stick to their fingers. Crooked contracts, buddy buddy deals, my uncle Horace has a bookstore maybe he can sell all the Little Red Schoolhouse books to the province for cost plus 200%, etc.

    If there is very little money, it pretty well has to go into keeping the lights on in the school, doesn't it? I mean if Uncle Horace gets it the school shuts. The schools are not shut yet, despite the very best efforts of the Ontario Teacher's Federation, I'd say its working.

    Jeeze, with thinking like yours is it any wonder that the rest of us fear the NDP? How quickly they forget Bob Rae and the 14 billion dollar provincial deficit! (This was a province with like 10 million people in it at the time.) It took the Harris Conservatives five years to dig their way out from under that pile.

    The McGuinty Liberal weiners haven't been in office long enough to swing this Sun deal, that has to have all been set up by the Conservative regime as a cost cutting measure. There's no reason on earth why classrooms in public schools need high horsepower machines running on expensive Mickeysoft crapware. There's nothing mission critical in a classroom that can't be done with a pencil, computers are largely wasted anyway. Better they should be as cheap as possible, eh?

    Dalton's boys will probably be back to Microsoft by 2005, it gives them better opportunities to steal.