Slashdot Mirror


Bagle/Beagle Variant Includes Source Code

NASAdude writes "Sunday brought a lot of fireworks... and the release of two new Bagle/Beagle variants. One of the variants includes a copy of its source code as an attachment as it spreads via email. It is expected the inclusion of the source will result in numerous variants. It's been dubbed Beagle.Y and Beagle.Z by Symantec and Bagle.ad and Bagle.ae by McAfee. ZDNet ran a story that covers these new variants."

219 comments

  1. new name by millahtime · · Score: 2, Funny

    And it will be come to be known as beagle.painintheass

  2. CVS by BenBenBen · · Score: 4, Funny

    beagle.sourceforge.net doesn't have it :(

    --
    The Slashdot Paradox: "100% Overrated"
    1. Re:CVS by akadruid · · Score: 2, Funny

      Give us a chance, we're just updating the project page. I was going to upload it but the other l33t h4xorz say there's some gentlemen wearing black suits at the door...

      --
      "Those who cast the votes decide nothing; those who count the votes decide everything." (attrib. Joseph Stalin)
    2. Re:CVS by jaavaaguru · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you know when the UltraSPARC port will be available? I've been feeling pretty left out...

    3. Re:CVS by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      You could still get bagle.sourceforge.net - sf.net/projects/bagle returns "Invalid project"...

    4. Re:CVS by dave_mcmillen · · Score: 5, Funny

      Laugh if you will, but I for one applaud this new era of open source viruses . . . Wait . . . Oops, my "open source = good" reflex was triggered before my brain had a chance to think about it.

    5. Re:CVS by dasmegabyte · · Score: 3, Funny

      Brings new meaning to the term "viral licensing."

      *b'dum-chik*

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    6. Re:CVS by Alby · · Score: 1

      OLD AND BUSTED: ::rimshot:: NEW HOTNESS: *b'dum-chik* I thank you, Sir!

    7. Re:CVS by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Hey, got to pimp this degree in rhetoric somehow. If my only gift to the literary world is using accurate onomatopoeia on Slashdot, I've still contributed more of use than some writers.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    8. Re:CVS by VivianC · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does anyone know if it is licensed under GPL or a BSD license? If I make modifications and distribute it, am I obligated to provide the source code to anyone who asks? I don't know if I want to risk contaminating my proprietary viruses with this open source virus.

      --
      Viv

      Gmail invites for ip
  3. what about... by epicstruggle · · Score: 2, Funny

    any news on beagle.mars?
    epic

    --
    "Im drowning here, and you're describing the water!"
    1. Re:what about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Tried to run it once, and it crashed.

  4. Scripting exploit by News+for+nerds · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I haven't RTFA, but is it rare that you see exploit code in VBscript or WSH which is inherently Open Source on Windows?

    1. Re:Scripting exploit by buro9 · · Score: 1

      RTFA! It's Assembler not a script.

    2. Re:Scripting exploit by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 5, Insightful

      VBscript or WSH which is inherently Open Source on Windows?

      <nitpick>Open-source is a type of licensing; VBScript is a language, and WSH a technology, not licensing regimes. Typically the source-code for a VBScript app is distributed with the application, but not necessarily - it might be obfuscated - but might well be subject to proprietary licensing restrictions.

      Just because you can see the source code doesn't make it open source. Open source implies certain freedoms that are additional to being able to see the code: the right to modify and redistribute the code, for example.

      </nitpick>

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    3. Re:Scripting exploit by News+for+nerds · · Score: 1

      You are right about Open Source, nonetheless worm authors won't prohibit re-distribution of their code because of obvious reason which makes it called 'worm' to be spread freely...

    4. Re:Scripting exploit by johannesg · · Score: 5, Funny
      Don't you suppose the right to redistribute is granted pretty much automatically for a virus?

    5. Re:Scripting exploit by Walkiry · · Score: 1

      Isn't it a felony to own the source code of malware?

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    6. Re:Scripting exploit by term8or · · Score: 2, Informative

      Isn't it a felony to own the source code of malware?

      I doubt it(IANAL). It's only a felony if you own the source code of malware with the intention of using it to damage or access an unauthorized computer. Otherwise people who write antivirus products would spend their entire life in jail.

      --



      "As a writer / novelist you might want to spellcheck your sig. :) " - AC
    7. Re:Scripting exploit by philbowman · · Score: 1

      The authors of the code are hardly going to sue you for redistributing it, as then they'd have to reveal who they were, which would open a whole can of worms for them.

      --
      Phil
    8. Re:Scripting exploit by martinthebrit · · Score: 3, Funny
      Ah Ha. I see the music industry's latest ploy
      1. Write self-spreading virus
      2. Distribute virus with standard copyright agreement and code
      3. ???
      4. Sue infected users for copyright infringement and profit!!!
    9. Re:Scripting exploit by shadowcabbit · · Score: 1

      but might well be subject to proprietary licensing restrictions.

      1. Write VBScript virus w/ proprietary license.
      2. Infect the whole goddamn world with it.
      3. Sue EVERYBODY.
      4. SCO^H^H^H Profit!

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
    10. Re:Scripting exploit by mwood · · Score: 1

      Um, the source for a VBscript app. *is* the app. It is kind of hard to execute a VBscript if you didn't get the script.

    11. Re:Scripting exploit by mwood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Don't you suppose the right to redistribute is granted pretty much automatically for a virus?"

      How amusing if it weren't. Maybe the authors could be prosecuted for circumventing a protection device *on their own property*. The sound of mental fuses popping would be deafening.

    12. Re:Scripting exploit by NemosomeN · · Score: 1

      Open source ASM program? Isn't the source code to ANY ASM program open source? (Easily disassembled, should get the same thing, sans MASM/NASM niceties) I guess comments might be nice, but in the end you're just gonna be adding another "Fuck the victim" section.

      --
      I hate grammar Nazi's.
    13. Re:Scripting exploit by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think it is illegal by the DMCA, because you're owning a tool that can be used to circumvent security. I know NMAP walks on the thin line with the DMCA, so I can't see how a virus wouldn't.

      Not that I care. People keep sending me viri; I have a whole mail folder full of them. If someone wants to claim that's illegal, I'm going to refer them to DSF#@@SDASDQ^2@aol.com.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    14. Re:Scripting exploit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just wait until we get DRM viruses with EULAs :(

    15. Re:Scripting exploit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just wait until we get DRM viruses with EULAs

      Don't worry, Longhorn is still a few years away. :o)

    16. Re:Scripting exploit by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

      I mentioned obfuscation (mangling the source so it's unreadable), though admittedly I don't know any VBScript developers who currently bother using it. I'm also not sure, coming from a web development background, that I'd accept "the source is the app". There's a whole bunch of graphics, text, etc that constitutes the app. The script is really just a small part of it.

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    17. Re:Scripting exploit by mwood · · Score: 1

      There is no other form of VBscript than the source. There is no other place for the app. to be. And I've seen "obfuscated" script code -- it's painful to read, but far from unreadable. If *you* can't understand it, neither can the interpreter.

      I'll have to grant you the graphics stuff, 'cos although I've written a pile of VBscript none of it ever had any visual interface; it's all commandline stuff to be run as workstation startup scripts or administrator tools or periodic auto-management tasks.

    18. Re:Scripting exploit by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

      There is no other form of VBscript than the source.

      But...getting back to the original point...that still doesn't make VBScript "Open Source" - Microsoft's made (part of) Windows available to study under "Shared Source", but that doesn't automatically make it "Open Source", which was the bizarre point the gp was trying to make.

      I take your point about obfuscated code - one job I had was running Java code from an insolvent company through an "un-obfuscator" (?) and it was rediculously easy. It strikes me as pointless, anyway, but I respect licenses and GPL my own code.

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    19. Re:Scripting exploit by mwood · · Score: 1

      True, Open Source requires not only source but the right to make use of it. If you have source but you're not allowed to read it, or barred from using your understanding of it, then what do you have?

  5. Another excuse for MS? by DrKayBee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ....to say that 'open source' is bad?. In all seriousness - what is the end to all this?

    --
    Humans have such a good sense of humor!
    1. Re:Another excuse for MS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Check the EULA that comes with the virus, it's Shared Source, not Open Source!

  6. Title by Sepper · · Score: 3, Funny

    Reading title fast, I thought that NASA had released some source code... *sigh*

    --
    I live in Soviet Canuckistan you insensitive clod!
    1. Re:Title by rjw57 · · Score: 4, Informative

      You mean the UK Universities which made Beagle2 ?

      Not everything space-related is NASA you insensitive clod! :)

      --
      Rich
    2. Re:Title by akadruid · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not everything space-related is NASA you insensitive clod! :)
      You can tell NASA's attempts from UK Universities with this simple test.
      Did space object in question:
      a. Crash and burn due to problems with the metric system or
      b. Vanish without trace

      If a then object is of NASA origin, if b, then non-NASA.
      Hope this helps clear up any confusion.

      --
      "Those who cast the votes decide nothing; those who count the votes decide everything." (attrib. Joseph Stalin)
    3. Re:Title by mpost4 · · Score: 1

      a) sorry to disapoint you but NASA uses metric too, infact in all sciences metric is used is is only the general population of the US that uses the other system.

      And speaking as a US citizen when well we learn and drop our current system for the metric, a much better system.

    4. Re:Title by GregChant · · Score: 2, Informative

      Grandparent was referring to this.

    5. Re:Title by luttapi · · Score: 1

      Speaking of NASA, I'm curious to know if any virus has actually reached beyond the earth, not by virtue of it being transmitted over a sattelite link but actually infecting a sattelite computer. If not we are probably not far off from that. Imagine a sattelite brought crashing into New York city by a virus!

    6. Re:Title by nwbvt · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Offtopic, I know...

      "a) sorry to disapoint you but NASA uses metric too, infact in all sciences metric is used is is only the general population of the US that uses the other system."

      Lockheed Martin didn't, which caused some problems with the Mars orbiter a couple of years ago.

      "And speaking as a US citizen when well we learn and drop our current system for the metric, a much better system."

      I want to know when we will drop that whole stupid decimal system for a better binary or at least hexadecimal system. What, people are used to the base 10 system and changing now would cause mass confusion and major conversion problems? Oh I'm sorry I think I just shot down your idea as well as mine. Oh well, better luck next time.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    7. Re:Title by mpost4 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I am refuring to constancy, metric is based on 10.
      the imerical system is based on some long dead kings foot size.

      question
      how many in's in a ft
      ft in a mile
      in in a mile
      ft in a yard
      in in a yard
      yard in a mile

      in metric it is all based on 10 you just have to move the decimal point.

    8. Re:Title by nwbvt · · Score: 1
      Yes, but what you don't seem to understand is that there will be a period of time during the conversion in which there will be serious conversion-related errors, such as the Mars Orbiter mishap. You can't just completely switch systems overnight nowadays any more than we can completely switch from a decimal counting system to a hexadecimal counting system.

      Which is easier to remember? 12 inches in a foot, or that a piece of paper is 21.59 cm by 27.94 cm instead of 8.5x11 inches?

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    9. Re:Title by Raphael · · Score: 1
      Which is easier to remember? 12 inches in a foot, or that a piece of paper is 21.59 cm by 27.94 cm instead of 8.5x11 inches?

      It is easier to remember that a standard piece of paper is 21 cm by 29.7 cm.

      --
      -Raphaël
    10. Re:Title by mpost4 · · Score: 1

      or I could just remember that it is 2159mm x 2794mm

    11. Re:Title by flibuste · · Score: 1

      Right on target ;-)
      Thanks (and mod this guy insightful plleeeeaaase)

    12. Re:Title by flibuste · · Score: 1

      Your scenario here resembles a lot the idiotic "Independence Day".
      Maybe it will happen the day after tomorrow?

      I'm outta here

    13. Re:Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, in mechanical engineering Mils (thousanths of an inch) are still teh measure of choice for high accuracy measurements.

    14. Re:Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The number ten (10) is not the (only) idea behind metric. I would say it is not even the most important idea.

      But then, you already knew that and want only to troll.

    15. Re:Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have neve had any reason to remember what exact size "A4" or "letter" or whatever paper is.

      But I constantly get confused about inches in a mile, pints in a gallon (which pints in which gallon?) sort of stuff.

      Every imperial measure has at least five different ratios. Quite few of the ratios differ depending on the environmnet they are used: There are three different "miles".

      These two facts are the problem with imperial units. Nothing else.

      They get even more problematic if you measure e.g. pressure ... (1 pounds per square inch is how many inches of mercury???). I could go on and on ... but you have made your mind and "no fact can change it".

    16. Re:Title by nwbvt · · Score: 1
      " I have neve had any reason to remember what exact size "A4" or "letter" or whatever paper is."

      Good for you. Other people have had reason to know that (or some other measurement).

      "These two facts are the problem with imperial units. Nothing else."

      But here is the problem. You not only have to show that completely switching to the metric system would bring benefits, but you also have to show that those benefits outweigh the problems that would occur.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    17. Re:Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is easier to remember? 12 inches in a foot, or that a piece of paper is 21.59 cm by 27.94 cm instead of 8.5x11 inches?

      Eventually you Americans will catch up with the rest of the world and use A4 instead of Letter. A4 is 210 x 297. I don't need to know that though, just set it to A4. All I'm hearing from you is that someone might be moving your cheese and how bad that would be for you.

    18. Re:Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But here is the problem. You not only have to show that completely switching to the metric system would bring benefits, but you also have to show that those benefits outweigh the problems that would occur.

      The rest of the world has taken the plunge because it is more efficient. As usual the Land of The Free and The Home of the AntiCompetitive are incapable of overcoming the inertia of their business community.

  7. ouch by mpost4 · · Score: 2, Informative

    that could hurt, now every kiddy scripter can get a copy of the code. how many (in reason) letters can we put at the end of the virus name to declare a new variant? watch out for Beagle.zzzzzzzzzzzzzz comming this July to an inbox near you.

    1. Re:ouch by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's okay, the source code is in assembler, so all the script kiddies will just look at it in confusion like it's some strange alien language.

    2. Re:ouch by mpost4 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Read teh artical, it says it is commented to help people understand what is going on aka think of this

      (example given in MIPS since it is the only assembler I know)


      li $24 1025 # this line loads into the register 24
      ## the port to be explorted (in this case port 1025)

      well think about this the kiddy scripter does not need to know that li is load imedate but all he needs to know is 24 is the register, do not touch, and 1025 is the port, change to a new port to try.
    3. Re:ouch by EvilCowzGoMoo · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Speaking from expierence, once source code is released there realy is no limit to how many varients we can expect.


      Bots in particular have sky rocketed. In the last few months alone we have seen names jump from two letter varients (bot.ay) up to 4! (bot. wrzq) Do the math, its an insane number.


      One of the major contributing factors are virus generators! Yes there are programs out there that will write the bot for you!


      On the other hand, because they are all variants of the same family, they are fairly easy to keep the AV software up to date to catch even the latest variants early.

    4. Re:ouch by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Does it also point out where to get an assembler? I suspect that'll be a barrier of entry for a lot of kiddies. (That is, those that don't know about the gcc suite of tools.)

    5. Re:ouch by mpost4 · · Score: 1

      don't know, but google will

    6. Re:ouch by Rithiur · · Score: 5, Funny

      And in the other news today, new variant of the Beagle virus, Beagle.goatse, opens a easily abusable back door in your system. However, so far it seems that hackers have been unwilling to use this hole to breach into our computer.

    7. Re:ouch by Doctor+O · · Score: 1
      Yes there are programs out there that will write the bot for you!

      This is new exactly how? Things like this are around for decades, the earliest I remember for DOS was VCL (Virus Creation Lab), but we had things like that on the C64 in the 80s already. But, as has been said, those are easy to detect as all 'created' virii derive from the same codebase.

      Not that there has been AV software for the C64. ;)

      --
      Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?
    8. Re:ouch by Free+Bird · · Score: 1

      GCC is pretty useless for real assembly programmers, because it uses the AT&T syntax which is stupid and counterintuitive.

      Personally, I use FASM.

    9. Re:ouch by nazsco · · Score: 1

      wh4t's Assembly? ...btw 1 sp3nd 3 n1ghts try1n6 t0 d3cod3 som3 s0rT 0f vbs c0d3 obfuscation th4t th15 l33t virus uses... 1t'5 4wessome!

    10. Re:ouch by JAD+lifter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Does it also point out where to get an assembler? I suspect that'll be a barrier of entry for a lot of kiddies.

      I cannot tell if you are being sarcastic or serious so I will assume that you are serious.
      Just about every skript kiddiot out there has a copy of MASM, TASM and/or NASM on his machine. If you do not believe me then you are underestimating the average skript kiddy. Go hang out in some script kiddy message boards or especially IRC and you will see that they may be obnoxious little scum but they are not quite as naive and incompetant as you make them out to be.

  8. Pretty please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can someone please make a variant that makes users regret not patching their systems? Like, overwrite the BIOS, turn ones into twos in all spreadsheet documents, delete all JPGs, MP3s and AVIs, send a resignation to boss@yourdomain.com and a log of your online banking transactions to the FCC, donate 10 bucks each to the KKK and THEN put up a screen which lists all that.

    1. Re:Pretty please by mpost4 · · Score: 1

      Hold one, so you want to ruin someones life for a mistake (yes a big one, but still) "send a resignation to boss@yourdomain.com" if you want to be evil and make a variant, make one that will patch the system and die.

    2. Re:Pretty please by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A much better solution would be to turn the computer into a spam zombie that only spams itself. After a few thousand spam messages from themselves cloud their inbox, they might actually realise, "Oh, This IS annoying!"

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    3. Re:Pretty please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think they deserve a chance, open a progress dialog and show what you're doing. First thing is BIOS corruption, so they're unlikely to stop that, but they can stop the rest by quickly turning the computer off. That removes one infectable/-ious machine from the net and it won't come back soon.

    4. Re:Pretty please by Barsema · · Score: 1

      Nah, I think you should try to teach the user to patch their system, not do it for them. Anyway if they have a boss that accepts a resignation letter from a virus you are doing them a favor

    5. Re:Pretty please by JosKarith · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nope. The best idea would be to search for .mp3's, or .jpg's that have a lot of "flesh tones" and corrupt them.
      After all, killing someone's OS is annoying, but deleting someone's pr0n collection is tantamount to declaration of war.
      Either that or randomly e-mail samples from said collection out as well as copies of itself with a header "Do you know what has hidden on his computer?"
      I really shouldn't be giving people ideas should I...

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    6. Re:Pretty please by Apreche · · Score: 1

      I have been wondering that myself. You would think that with all these viruses and vulnerabilities in windows and other MS software someone would have written a mean virus. But it seems that every worm and bug out there only does stupid stuff. They send spam. They steal information. They throw ads on your screen. Why hasn't anyone made one that formats all disks? What about one that makes a nice skull bounce around on your screen laughing at you. Its like these virus writers want to break into computers, but they aren't looking to do real damage.

      I think this is a large part of the reason people aren't protecting themselves better. They have no reason to since the viruses they get aren't particularly damaging. As soon as there is a virus that formats all disks you'll see ignorant people starting to do something about computer security.

      --
      The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    7. Re:Pretty please by anon*127.0.0.1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oddly enough, had something like that happen to one of our agents. He called in to complain that he couldn't get any work done. Every few seconds, his PC would pop up a little window saying "Scanning outgoing EMail" and lock up for a moment. Then the window would disappear and everything would be back to normal. Until the window reappeared.

      Turned out he'd picked up a mass mailing virus. He had Norton AV installed, but hadn't wanted to pay to keep his virus defs updated. Norton was scanning every outgoing EMail, but didn't see anyting it recognized and let them all pass through.

      I told the guy he'd have to pay to update his virus defs in order to fix the thing. Actually, Norton offers a free remover for that particular virus, but I didn't want the guy calling me back in another two weeks with a different virus.

      --
      I am NOT a man!
      I am a free number!
    8. Re:Pretty please by chegosaurus · · Score: 1

      I've often wondered why this hasn't happened. It's just what the world needs. Yes, some data (read pr0n and mp3s) would be lost, but it would teach a lot of valuable lessons - lessons which must be learned somewhere along the line. Keep backups. Use a firewall. Keep up-to-date with patches. Don't trust *anyone*. DON'T USE WINDOWS!

      Something simple, like writing big random blocks of data all over the disk would be enough. (Got to defeat those pesky undelete tools.) Screw the bootblock, hose the VTOC (or whatever Windows calls it). Go hog wild. The only limits are the limits of j00r imagination.

      Come on kids, one of you must be up to the job! Okay, so if you get caught you might get a bit of time, but you'll be WORLD FAMOUS! Teh most pheared haX0r on teh planet!

    9. Re:Pretty please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the CPUID indicates a mobile CPU, tweak the display timing. LCDs don't like odd timings.

      If you're not going to make the system unusable, install a driver that finalizes every CD-R/DVD-R inserted into the writer, even if it's completely empty.

      Where possible, permanently set the ethernet MAC address to C1:A5:51:F1:AB:1E.

    10. Re:Pretty please by Sangui5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Really, that's a little unfair. I mean, not patching has been relatively consequence free for quite a while now. Suddenly dooming them right away is a bit harsh.

      Rather, I'd create a small family of malwares, and have each one leave behind some indication of that it had been there. Do it in some way that the virus scanners may have a hard time cleaning it up. Also, notify the users that they've been hit. Tell them this is their last chance to repent. Give them pointers to resources to help them repent. Remember, the end is near...

      After people have been duly warned by worms and viruses that have had their chance to spread and die out, I'd release the punisher malware. Something nasty, a blended threat type thing using all the latest techniques to spread. Now, this would be the one with the payload. It would look for evidence that you'd been hit with one of the previous malwares, and assign points based on how they got in, and if they were cleaned up. Say 1 point for getting infected by a zero-day exploit in Opera that you've since cleaned up after, but 100 points for getting hit by an email worm which proudly announces "I am a virus. Do not click on the pretty linkey and run me!" or somesuch. Points can also be assigned based on what software is on the system. A machine loaded with spyware, or infected with other viruses gets more points. One with a firewall or behind a NAT box gets a deduction.

      Now what is the purpose of the points, you ask? A person collecting many points gets their machine fubar'ed. A person with no points gets a notice of how our nasty nasty worm got in, and help cleaning it up. People in between perhaps get all their valuable MP3s scrambled, or something. You get the picture.

      Now, one really can't say that everyone hasn't recieved warning, now. Everyone who got infected previously got notice, and help to change their wicked ways. Of course, some people are rather dense. So, after a few months, we'd have to start over again. Sure, it'll be harder, since many people will have wised up (I hope so), but many probably won't. This time around, however, the stick should come closer in time to the bad behaviour. Reinforcement learning works better that way. Additionally, I think the standards for who gets the smackdown should be lowered. Frag'ing their systems for incrementially smaller violations every cycle will hopefully get people to shape up. After a while, it won't matter--an unpatched system won't last long in such a hostile environment. And if the software is just inheirently insecure *cough*IEandActiveX*cough* then the best thing to do is just not run it.

      Sadly, this won't teach anyone. Especially those runninng "alternative" software--be it application or OS. Apple's customers are rather poor at running anti-virus software. One can't blame them--there isn't much reason to. I myself don't worry about email viruses at all--that's because I read my mail with Pine. On a Sparc. Somebody else's Sparc, where I don't keep any valuable data. Now, I'm sure Pine has some sort of exploitable bugs in it. With all of the MS PC's either patched or nuked to oblivion, what's a poor virus writer to do?

      That's just my 2 cents

    11. Re:Pretty please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      donate 10 bucks each to the KKK

      Isn't that how much you need to post on their forums?

    12. Re:Pretty please by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That outlook worm a while back did mail random samples from someone's document collection out. As the ratio of pornography to other documents on the system rose, the likelihood of the system sending out one's porn increases, so it should be a self-controlling system...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Pretty please by gosand · · Score: 2, Funny
      Can someone please make a variant that makes users regret not patching their systems?

      Some ideas:

      It installs Linux on their system (let them figure out that dependency hell!) [note to self: make sure it isn't Debian, apt-get rocks]

      It makes their homepage default to Slashdot

      It sends an email to RMS every day saying "Aren't you the guy who created Linux?"

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    14. Re:Pretty please by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "Why hasn't anyone made one that formats all disks? "

      What benefit to the virus writer is there in that? I look at this as a sign that the virus industry has "matured" past the point of petty vandalism to theft of service.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    15. Re:Pretty please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mp3's? What?

    16. Re:Pretty please by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Ah, mp3's of the Fleshtones,
      yeah. They oughtta be corrupted already, though.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  9. How long... by rjw57 · · Score: 4, Funny

    How long until SCO sues Bagle's author for copyright infringement....

    --
    Rich
    1. Re:How long... by CrackedButter · · Score: 0

      how long before MS holds this as proof of evidence that open source code IS a virus!

    2. Re:How long... by Smidge204 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      1) Create worm that infects millions of computers.

      2) Claim users have installed your software without puchasing a license. Threaten to sue unless $699 fee is paid per machine.

      3) Profit!

      Oh my...
      =Smidge=

  10. Shared source by Snaapy · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:Shared source by kunudo · · Score: 1

      Yes, "bagle", but if you do the same query with correct spelling, eg beagle, you get something relevant. How odd... :)

    2. Re:Shared source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a link to the English results.

  11. So MS was right... by stm2 · · Score: 1, Funny

    If a virus is OSS, MS was right when said that OSS is a virus :)

    --
    DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
  12. That's to make prosecution more difficult by Advocadus+Diaboli · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So far you could spot a viurs author by the "evidence" that he had the source code of the virus on his PC. Now everybody has the source. I guess we need bigger jails soon.

    1. Re:That's to make prosecution more difficult by tokul · · Score: 1
      So far you could spot a viurs author by the "evidence" that he had the source code of the virus on his PC.
      author has source of all versions or he/she has lost all previous versions and decided to use net of zombies as backup solution.
  13. Released Source? by tomakaan · · Score: 1

    Is this something we're going to start seeing more of? There are already enough variants of viruses as it is. Imagine the craziness of five thousand variants of every virus that comes along. Gaobot was already painful enough to deal with.

  14. open source virus ! by phreakv6 · · Score: 1

    There it is... OS virus must be hosted on sourceforge :)..

    --
    fifteen jugglers, five believers
  15. Seen it... by lachlan76 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seem Familiar?

    In all seriousness, having the source code can't be a bad thing, since this way, it'll be easier to stop if we understand how it works.

    And at least if we all get a virus, there is a good programmer behind it, and it's less likely to crash on all of us.

    Normally I'd consider virus writers the scum of the earth, but this one is talented enough to be a professional hacker, from my limited experience with assembly language (512 byte boot sector on a FD). Not that I endorse email worms, but this guy has talent.

    1. Re:Seen it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's a safe assumption. Are you a gambling man (or woman)?

    2. Re:Seen it... by ScouseMouse · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Its social conditioning.

      Most people tend to think that only other blokes are so pathetic as to sit in front of a computer all day and write viruses. Girls obviously all have a life, and have better things to do.

      To be fair, this does seem to backed up by the FBI's arrest record.

      Of course it could just be because the girls are smarter and dont get caught.

    3. Re:Seen it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      In all seriousness, having the source code can't be a bad thing, since this way, it'll be easier to stop if we understand how it works.

      You may not understand how it works without the source code but the reverse engineers at AV companies do.

    4. Re:Seen it... by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Normally I'd consider virus writers the scum of the earth, but this one is talented enough to be a professional hacker, from my limited experience with assembly language (512 byte boot sector on a FD). Not that I endorse email worms, but this guy has talent.
      Sociopathic, self-centred, a total arsehole, but talented nonetheless.

      Man, if the author could be turned to the Light Side though... small, efficient windows applications, well written in assembler... sounds like Steve Gibson's Evil Twin.

    5. Re:Seen it... by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Neo: It's just that I thought you were a guy...

      Trinity: Most guys do.

    6. Re:Seen it... by ScouseMouse · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yep, i'm a bloke, but i'm also an amateur psycologist, and i also work as a geek in a law firm, i think that means i am not technically a human any more because I sold my soul or something.

      :P

    7. Re:Seen it... by lachlan76 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not an AV person, nor do a have a copy of Beagle, but if the source code is not encrypted, then you have an easy target to look for.

      And besides, it gives the new people something to practice with ("Here's a copy of Bagle, explain how it works, and find a way of detecting it.").

    8. Re:Seen it... by mwood · · Score: 1

      Sold your soul? I think you found it!

    9. Re:Seen it... by Gogo+Dodo · · Score: 1

      All of the anti-virus companies detect piles of Bagle variants. They don't need the source. They already know how it works and what it does (read any of the anti-virus library entries). Releasing the source doesn't help anybody except for the script kiddies who will modify it. They already have, but now there will be more.

    10. Re:Seen it... by dabraham · · Score: 1
      Of course it could just be because the girls are smarter and dont get caught.

      Or that the FBI is also just assuming that these people are all male and don't investigate the female leads...

    11. Re:Seen it... by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Naah, I've got it right here. Lawyers sell their souls to Satan, he contracts out the torture to me.

      --
      Not a sentence!
  16. Bagle.ad and Bagle.ae by paj1234 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is so boring. Soon we'll have Bagle.zzz.

    1. Re:Bagle.ad and Bagle.ae by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Is that the point where you go to sleep because it's all so boring?

    2. Re:Bagle.ad and Bagle.ae by howman · · Score: 1

      no... soon we will have bagle.creamcheese...
      I wonder if the patch will be called Lox

      --
      flinging poop since 1969
  17. The real question is... by atomic-penguin · · Score: 4, Funny

    What license is it released under?

    --
    /^([Ss]ame [Bb]at (time, |channel.)){2}$/
    1. Re:The real question is... by Eradicator2k3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's being released under the SCO "Indian Giver" license. This allows TSCOG to make numerous contributions to the source and then re-release it. This is followed later with complaints as to how much of TSCOG's IP has made it into the virus. TSCOG will then threaten to sue "end-users" (read: victims) of Bagle.SCO, unless they're willing to pay $699 ($1399 after 13 Oct) per CPU for the privilege of having licensed version of the virus.

      --
      Mr. T pitied this fool on 27 July 1992.
    2. Re:The real question is... by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1

      oh, i thought the real question was 'Does it run Linux?' ;)

    3. Re:The real question is... by Oscar_Wilde · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it is the GPL.

      I know several windows zealots who tell me it is viral...

    4. Re:The real question is... by atomic-penguin · · Score: 1

      Only with the brand spanking new Cedega 4.0

      --
      /^([Ss]ame [Bb]at (time, |channel.)){2}$/
  18. Something I shoulda Done by PakProtector · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This just brings to mind an idea I've had for a long time now. And it's in no way an unique idea, I know that for a fact.

    So here's the idea: Write a variant of one of these viruses. And he's what it does. When it infects a machine, it sends out copies of itself to every person in the address book. After that, it forces the machine to download some sort of Anti-Virus software. PC-Cillin or NOD32 are favorites of mine. It installs them, then forces a Windows Update.

    Sounds good, right? But read on. My second idea is better.

    Here it is:
    Viral Anti-Virus Software.
    Most virus recognition is based on Pattern Recognition, from what I have garnered from my research. Create a virus that spreads like wildfire -- kind of like Melissa and Code Red spread all crazy-fast -- except this little bit of code contains Virus Recognition software in it. It invades unprotected boxen and then starts a continuous scan for Viruses.

    You know how most people click 'Yes!' to anything that pops up, a la Gator?

    Have this little golden nugget of Illegal Do-Gooding pop up a small dialog saying, "File.Extention is infected with a virus (XX% Probability). Do you wish to delete? Y/N?"

    And just to hold with custom:
    Step One: Create Virus.
    Step Two: JAIL!
    Step Three: PROFIT!

    --

    Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
    man: no entry for woman in the manual.
    "Qua!?"

    1. Re:Something I shoulda Done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Result: Users become even more reluctant to patch their systems. Either your worm does what it's supposed to do, then users have less reason to patch their system, or it does not work as expected, then it's just another worm which AV companies have to add to the databases.

    2. Re:Something I shoulda Done by Anonytroll · · Score: 1

      I can already imagine the bounty for you if you go through with that.
      "Dares to fix some problems. 1 Million Dollars, dead or alive (preferably dead)."

    3. Re:Something I shoulda Done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      There have been several "anti-virus viruses" that didn't quite work, and ended up being a major pain to deal with.

    4. Re:Something I shoulda Done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have finally attained the Holy Grail of all Slashdot-profit ideas: the elusive step before "Step n: PROFIT!!!"

      More seriously though, this will just make users lazier than they already are. I've seen people infected with virii (or viruses, whichever you prefer), because their virus defs are 500+ days old. Their systems are left unpatched. They have no firewall up. They know they need these things, but they choose not to do it, or ask for someone's help in helping them install it.

      I've taught my mom how to recognize email virii, and how to tell whether websites are trustworthy. And she uses Mozilla easily. If my mom (or Aunt Tilly) can do it, anyone can. It's just a matter of effort. The only way people will be secure is if they make an effort to be secure.

      You can make all the tools in the world, but security is an inevitable chore. Do it, and reap the benefits. Don't, and enjoy your dirty dishes.

    5. Re:Something I shoulda Done by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      Although your idea may help prevent PCs from becoming infected, it will still clog up networks with all of its traffic, possibly causing network outages and lost money for the business. In the end, your "solution" really isn't much better than the problem.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    6. Re:Something I shoulda Done by TheRain · · Score: 1

      Hey! I think Microsoft probably has a similar idea in mind.

      1. Call Windows XP "obsolete" and "unsupported".

      2. Force a new OS with built in virus protection down everyone's throats that includes forced service fees and MAKES you continousely update.

      Little bit different approach, but still somewhat similar.

      --
      Please help! I'm stuck inside my virtual reality headset!
    7. Re:Something I shoulda Done by McG33k · · Score: 1

      It hasn't happened yet, but this is coming and we have predicted this for over a year now. Viruses will spread and attach a random document from your system with it. This sounds simple enough and you might think "Who cares about my book report from high school."

      The real problem here is with privileged documents including medical ant attorney-client privileged documents. The implications of this are huge and this is not limited to the private sector. There is no reason that a government system could not get infected and spread documents which are confidential.

      Hey, maybe we'll finally get a document explaining what happened at Area51! At least that would be a cool outcome of such a virus.

      In any event, this is the next big revolution in worms and it will be interesting to watch and see where we will go next.

      --geek

    8. Re:Something I shoulda Done by robfoo · · Score: 1

      Due to the lack of obvious sarcasm in your post, I'll reply. Ignoring the obvious stupidity of a virus to fix a virus, I take issue with the following

      ...sends out copies of itself to every person in the address book...
      ...spreads like wildfire...

      In my experience, the major problem with most viruses is the spreading, not the payload. These days it's very rare to find a virus that actually does any serious damage (and I'd have to agree that with most viruses-exploiting-months-old-holes any damage is probably deserved).

      The problem is the viruses don't just affect those who get infected. Every time there's a decent outbreak, every bloody person on the planet gets upwards of a dozen emails, either with the virus, or a bogus 'you sent a virus' message from retarded anti-virus scanners.
      Upshot of this is that the internet slows down for *everyone*. Email service dies for some people. Famine, drought, riots, AIDS, cancer.
      It's just a general pain-in-the-ass.

      For every viral-anti-virus email you send out, I shall kill you.

    9. Re:Something I shoulda Done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well met, Stewey. Now, shall the Brocolli taunt you some?

  19. Dont use the source... by TEMM · · Score: 1

    ...or the jack ass that coded the virus will sue you for Ip infringement. I mean come on, how obvious is that?

  20. Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is the source?

    1. Re:Source by TEMM · · Score: 1

      There is no source.

    2. Re:Source by Technician · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Where is the source?

      I don't know, but the Department of Homeland Security, the FBI, and the CIA are looking for them also.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    3. Re:Source by shadowcabbit · · Score: 1

      Where is the source?

      In a building on a floor no one can get to, behind a locked door with no key.

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
    4. Re:Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seriously Why would the CIA give a rats ass?

      do you even know what the CIA does?

  21. Re:MSN Killer? by mausmalone · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, it's been killing the network where I work as help-desk support. I get so many calls and e-mails about Beagle now that I just keep the Sarc page open all day so I can quote from it and send the link to people. Our server blocks the viral attachment, but we're still bogged down with how many viral messages get sent to us.

    --
    -=-=-=-=-=
    I'd rather be flamed than ignored.
  22. this is not news by ajs318 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All it means is that there are still clueless people using computers. I already know that. Sometimes I think it's a damn shame viruses can't do the kind of real, permanent damage that shocks a clue into people -- if there is such a thing. For once I'm actually wishing for a SCO story.

    Please, please, please, I know I'm preaching to the choir here, but please, for crying out loud, please if anyone ever asks you about buying a new computer, just point them towards the nearest Apple authorised reseller. If they complain about the price, point out that the inherent usability and security designed into Mac OS X from the ground up will more than pay for itself in terms of not cursing and screaming at the damn thing every time you boot it up. If that doesn't work, mention that Macs are prettier. If that still doesn't work, give them six months tops before you're saying "I told you so".

    Windows may be popular but that doesn't make it any good.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    1. Re:this is not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While you're at it, show them this article.

    2. Re:this is not news by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Yeah ..... tell you what, why don't I return the favour, and suggest you check out Simpson's Paradox?

      It's not unreasonable to suppose that the market share of Windows could be skewing the figures in a way that makes Windows look more secure than it really is, because one isolated incident on a rare kind of machine is going to look like a bigger deal than it really is. When there are more Macs and more Linux desktops out there, we will have a fairer comparison.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    3. Re:this is not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Windows may be popular "
      "but that doesn't make it any good."

      Well, whores are popular, & they are good.

  23. Another one bites the dust... by mindmaster064 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm so glad my entire network is running Linux. :) I swear there is some major virus every goddamn week. Linux has it's own problems, but I am glad I can do something about them. I wonder how long it will take for businesses to realize that running around chasing exploits and viruses isn't a good way to make use of your technical support staff time.

    -Mind

  24. Oh well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least it is open sourced.. Wonder if it's GPL'ed as well? :)

  25. Slap a GPL on it quickly! by Domini · · Score: 2, Funny

    And what about a copyright notice on Virii in future? Could MacAfee be sued for reverse-engineering a virus?
    -grin-

  26. Source yes, but is it GPL'ed? by wde · · Score: 1

    I've really been feeling left out lately. Does anyone know if this source code paylod has been released under the GPL? I mean, I'd really love to build this virus under Linux but only if I can compromise my OS without compromising anyone's IP.

    Has SCO consented to the dissemination of this source code??

  27. WARNING! by B2382F29 · · Score: 1

    Your Computer is broadcasting an IP.

    --
    Move Sig. For great justice.
    1. Re:WARNING! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warning! Your House is broadcasting a postal address! With this, someone could begin attacking you!

    2. Re:WARNING! by B2382F29 · · Score: 1

      Get your head out of your ass.
      IP = Intellectual Property (like in Source Code to Virus)

      --
      Move Sig. For great justice.
  28. What about beagle.mars? by akadruid · · Score: 1

    There is an effective firewall out there to block this. It's known as 'atmosphere'. If you have one of these sheilding your system, beagle.mars will be sandboxed before it can execute.

    --
    "Those who cast the votes decide nothing; those who count the votes decide everything." (attrib. Joseph Stalin)
  29. Give new meaning to the term "viral licensing" by m0RpHeus · · Score: 2, Funny

    One of the variants includes a copy of its source code as an attachment as it spreads via email.

    Just what we need. An Open Source Virus. And if it is somehow GPLed, we'll *really* have viral licensing. ;)

    --
    Take-off every .sig! For Great Justice!
  30. This is not an attack by HBPiper · · Score: 2, Funny

    Its a resume!

    --
    "I went on a diet, swore off drinking and heavy eating. And in fourteen days, I had lost exactly two weeks. Joe E. Lewis
  31. Old news by dk.r*nger · · Score: 1

    Assembler, I laugh at you..

    I had "I Love You" faxed to me over a mail-to-fax gateway back in the day :D

    Complete with VB-script sourcecode.

  32. Want to cause problems? use port 80 by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 2, Funny

    If someone wanted to really cause problems, they'd modify that thing to use port 80 to spread itself, and disguise the packets as /. traffic. What admin would notice if it was a virus, or just some new story on /.?

    D'OH!

    --
    stuff |
  33. Didn't Linus predict this? by Minwee · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Only wimps use tape backup. Real men just include their important stuff in a Windows worm and let the rest of the world mirror it."

  34. Preaching to the choir? by kunudo · · Score: 0

    I think not.

    1. Re:Preaching to the choir? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Preaching to the queer, more like.

  35. even better.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bittrackker a linux distribution, install it to the harddisk, and reboot. Make it look as much like windows as possible (substitute openoffice with word links etc.), and have an automatic network settings and Documents importer. Then wait and see if anyone notices :)

  36. Beagle not dead! by kyknos.org · · Score: 1

    So Beagle finally called home?

    --

    SHE does throw dice.
  37. not sure. by fraxinus-tree · · Score: 0

    > Don't you suppose the right to redistribute is granted pretty much automatically for a virus? here, (re)distribution of computer viruses is a crime, at least intentionally, and having a modified source code pretty well shows intention.

  38. Could someone mail me a copy? by alteridem · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh wait, there are a dozen in my inbox already. God you guys are quick, thanks ;)

    1. Re:Could someone mail me a copy? by orangesquid · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness, I'm curious to see the source. If someone has a copy, could they post it somewhere downloadable, maybe with the nibbles swapped so that script kiddies can't figure out how to read it?

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
  39. Re:CVS w by SuneSpeg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually.. i know its been tried before, i think it was code red/nimda ?, where someone made a patch spreading in same manner, but instead it patched the systems.

    About time to try that concept again ?
    I know its gonna generate some traffic, but 1 new variant amongst 50+ new others isnt much.

    Consider pro/cons

    + you could patch most of the vulnerable systems by including the official M$ patch
    + inform the user that the pc is victim of a virus and lead him/her to a virusscan.
    + remove the original virus, or some of the variants.
    + save bandwidth/spam for each pc fixed [1]

    -generate more traffic [1] nothing compared to the current amount of net traffic and spam it generates.
    -would be illegal

    Worth to consider imho, if you write it properly and not suffer from same flaws as the codered one did. Im sure you could do far more good than harm .

    beagle.sourceforge.net might not be the proper place for it though :)

  40. Don't worry by bigberk · · Score: 1

    The McAfee virus info page says that the source code is encrypted. Assuming the author used something sound like PGP, we'll probably never see the source code.

    1. Re:Don't worry by shadowcabbit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The McAfee virus info page says that the source code is encrypted. Assuming the author used something sound like PGP, we'll probably never see the source code.

      If it's encrypted, how did they find out it's source code? They must have already cracked it.

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
    2. Re:Don't worry by johnkoer · · Score: 4, Funny

      If it's encrypted, how did they find out it's source code? They must have already cracked it.

      And the author has already filed his DMCA suit against them for cracking his encryption.

  41. What a curious test... by gilroy · · Score: 1

    ... of the open source paradigm. Will "many eyeballs" lead to a supervirus in an absurdly short time span? Or will it lead to the rapid evolution of anti-viral software?

    Either way Microsoft will offer this as proof that those Open Source guys are all evil.

  42. Source code ? by agam4ever · · Score: 1

    So ... what's the verdict ?? Do we get to see the source code anywhere ?? Can someone please point me to it ? :)

    1. Re:Source code ? by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      Here, I'll email it too ya...

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  43. All these virus description websites are lacking by zaqattack911 · · Score: 1

    They tell me everything but explicitly how it spreads!!

    YesI know it opens a backdoor on port 1234, I know all about what it does, and I know I need to update my virus scanner here.

    How the fuck do I prevent getting it? Is it a vulnerability in Outlook specifically? or is it truely something in WinXP/2k like the virus definition page suggests. Do I have to execute the attachement to catch it, or as soon as outlook opens the email I have the virus?

    Fucking BS virus defn pages don't seem to want to tell us how to prevent getting the virus... only how to remove it.

    Love,
    Zaq

  44. Re:CVS w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be good PR for the Open Source community and those idiots at the commercial anti-virus companies wouldn't be the only ones talking to the media.

  45. Whats the motive by nmk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have often heard people say that Linux and OS X are more secure due to obscurity. I was just wodering if one can, perhaps, look at the situation from a different perspective. Geeks have hated MS for a long time, and they are the ones who have the technical skills to exploit Windows vulneribilities. The internet has finally given them a way to attack MS with their limited resources.

    One is often made to believe that Windows viruses and trojans are primarily the work of scrip kiddies and that windows is simply targetted becuase it is the dominant platform. Is it possible that we are seeing the beginning of something more incideous than this. Perhaps a large percentage of these attacks are the work of people who simply want to hard Windows public image.

    I know some of this may sound obvious (a "no shit sherlock" situation). However, I have never really seen the problem discussed from this perspective. I know that most responsible Geeks on this forum condemn computer viruses. However, there are a lot of pissed off people out there and this is the easiest way to hit MS. It just takes a bit of decent code (in the evil sense) and you can cause the loss of countless millions to the customers of MS.

    I think that if this is the case, then Windows will eventually fall. Nobody will be able to create an OS that can withstand the combined wrath of the world Geeks. Just food for thought.

    1. Re:Whats the motive by nmk · · Score: 1

      want to hard Windows public image. uhh, that was supposed to be "hurt Windows pulic image"

  46. Cheers! by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

    Great.. Now Microsoft can legitimately say that Open Source enthusiasts write viruses and therefore Open Source is evil ...

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    1. Re:Cheers! by tiger99 · · Score: 1

      There seem to be a lot of stupid people here on Slashdot today, who automatically assume that becasue something includes source, it is open source. There is in fact, in the laws of the US, UK, most of Europe, and anywhere else signatory to the berne conventions, implied copyright on anything which is written, including software. It actually needs an explicit statement to release anything as "open source" (which needs a licence to be defined or referred to) or as "public domaon".

    2. Re:Cheers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Urm...

      I wasnt expecting anyone to take that last comment that seriously... I was going for a funny point!

    3. Re:Cheers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMFG, teh open sores fanboy is havening teh hott flashes,,, KILL KILL KILL!!!!!!1!!

  47. Re:CVS w by mwood · · Score: 4, Insightful

    *sigh* Please don't release another anti-virus-virus. The last one was at least as much a pain as the one it was supposed to cure.

  48. Re:CVS w by SuneSpeg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Indeed it was, but it sure also had some flaws. Learning by the mistakes of it, and write a smarter anti-virus-virus, im sure you could generally benefit from it. Personally i prefer to see a little log entry in my firewall, than 500 pieces of spam in my inbox. No doubt its an unusual approach, but what other (working) methods do you suggest to wipe out 50 new variants ?

  49. An End To This Anarchy by kc_cyrus · · Score: 1
    Let EVERYBODY who wants to sit behind a computer pass a driving exam JUST LIKE you must pass an exam before beeing allowed to drive a car or a motorcycle or even a bike!

    Stop brainwashing people that using a pc is "soooo easy"... No!
    Force them to spend a reasonable amount of time in "theory" and "practic" lessons first.

    As a geek, I don't drive cars becuase i don't have a driving license. I know that driving a car without having a driving license is against the laws and against my own common sense becuase i can endager my life and the lives of others in the highway.
    So why my grandma must be allowed to just turn her computer on and "drive" to the information highway without having anykind of protection and license to do it, causing danger for his own car (pc) and others, is beyond my comprehension.

    1. Re:An End To This Anarchy by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      You'd be amazed at some of the idiots that manage to pass the driving tests. I don't think you want to hold that up as a model.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    2. Re:An End To This Anarchy by 26199 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That approach, while fine twenty years ago, isn't at all realistic today. Today PCs are sold as something which is easy to use and useful for everyone. And they should be. The fact that they aren't is the problem of the people who designed/implemented things badly in the first place.

      Given that all most people want a PC for is web browsing and email, why the f*ck haven't Microsoft come up with an OS which can do that, and just that, without any security risks at all? This puzzles me somewhat.

      Regardless, the problem mostly lies with the laughable state of Windows, not with the users. Sure, they could be more careful -- but on a fresh Windows install you need to be more than careful, you need to be damn good to keep it secure.

    3. Re:An End To This Anarchy by ctw · · Score: 1
      Given that all most people want a PC for is web browsing and email, why the f*ck haven't Microsoft come up with an OS which can do that, and just that, without any security risks at all? This puzzles me somewhat.

      Probably because they want to sell MS Office to those people, who will likely want to write a letter at some point. Yes, they could use Wordpad, but only if they can find it!

    4. Re:An End To This Anarchy by flibuste · · Score: 1

      Yes, and while they are writing, they might enjoy listening to some music - good thing if they can change tunes by just clicking around.
      And since they are writing letters, they might also want to print them...
      And maybe they'd like to decorate them with an image they can create using a drawing program.
      And maybe they'd like to read slashdot too, but that is far more unlikely.

    5. Re:An End To This Anarchy by das3cr · · Score: 1

      Given that all most people want a PC for is web browsing and email, why the f*ck haven't Microsoft come up with an OS which can do that, and just that, without any security risks at all? This puzzles me somewhat.

      I thought they did. Wasn't it called web tv?

      --
      Hurricane Island Outward Bound
      OB
    6. Re: Re:An End To This Anarchy by kc_cyrus · · Score: 1
      Are you suggesting that people just grab their car keys and go drive in highways? Without any knowledge about what they are doing?

      Requesting people to obtain a 'virtual' driving license before surfing on an information highway is an initial point to start teaching people how they have to "drive" their computer just like they drive their cars or bike or anyother counterpoint highway in order to *not* endanger theirs or others' lives.

      This approach, my friend, may even works for riding horses in wild west...

    7. Re: Re:An End To This Anarchy by 26199 · · Score: 1

      There's a real problem with that analogy. Cars cannot, given the current state of technology, be safe when used by incompetent people. Computers could be.

      Since you seem to like arguing by analogy, I'll do one too. Suppose the most popular brand of cellphones was made in such a way that if you happened to connect up the battery incorrectly, they'd explode and kill anyone in the vicinity.

      By your reasoning, that would mean you shouldn't be allowed a cellphone unless you can prove you can connect the battery up right. By my reaoning, it's the cellphone makers who are at fault.

  50. Check your assumptions, mate. by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    You're assuming that resigning his job is a bad thing.

    Me, I forsee a bright future for the victim as a computer security consultant!!!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  51. Um... by IWantMyNickBack · · Score: 1

    What if someone were to create, say, an opensource virus that automatically installed Firefox, Thunderbird, etc. onto Windows and constantly asks... "Do you want to switch to Linux? Yes, Yes, Cancel"

  52. yipee by pierredefermat · · Score: 0

    oss+mac= os X oss+MS = virus btw i am installing freeBSD in my laptop now.

  53. ".Z" by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 1

    They should name them in chinese characters, in order to not to run out of alphabet too soon.

    --
    There you are, staring at me again.
    1. Re:".Z" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So who was the bright spark who ran compress over Beagle? Don't these script kiddies know that their Windows brethren have no idea what .Z means, let alone how to decompress it?

  54. Re:All these virus description websites are lackin by mustangsal66 · · Score: 1

    It has installation instructions when you double click on it...

    --
    Why worry? Each of us is wearing an unlicensed "nucular" accelerator on his back.
    Sig changed for readability by G.W.
  55. Public domain. by jesser · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unless the author is dumb enough to reveal himself by suing you for copyright infringement, it's public domain.

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
  56. Idea for virus authors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Find text files and Office documents, and mutate names of people, e.g. "John Smith" -> "Shit Eater". Just needs a simple table of common names and substitutions of appropriate length so you don't need to understand the file format. Same for outgoing and incoming e-mail, address books, etc.

    Once people have to explain why they send e-mail to Aunt Cock Gobble and referred to their boss as Goat Felch, they might consider keeping their virus definitions up to date or even switching OS.

  57. Your kung fu is weak! by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    Oh yeah, well we have an anti-anti-virus-virus!

    (Or would that be an anti-virus virus? Crap, I phail eet.)

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  58. Virus GPLed? Microsoft is right then... by EqualSlash · · Score: 1

    They have been whining all the while about the Viral nature of GPL. Now they get proof!

  59. Re:All these virus description websites are lackin by Wyzard · · Score: 1

    The antivirus companies want you to get infected. That way, if you have their software, it tells you it found the virus and you see that your purchase was justified; if you don't have their software, you get hit by the virus and start thinking that maybe you should buy some antivirus software.

    If antivirus vendors told everyone how to avoid getting the virus without using antivirus software, they'd be reducing demand for their own products.

  60. We are 'safe', for now by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Eventually, as *nix based machines become more wide spread, these idiots will spend more time looking for holes...

    True it wont be as many as windows currently does, but they will be there..

    And you cant discount the trojans that dont need anything other then the user behind the keyboard to cause local profile damage, and spread..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  61. Thank goodness! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At last, a virus I can run on my 100% pure Debian system. I've been feeling left out.

  62. I'm surprised . . . by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    that the killer worm hasn't come yet.

    Seriously.

    Not that I'm looking forward to that day, as it means that I'll spend a WHOLE lot of time fixing other people's computers :( :( :( :( :(

    But all the 'I Told You Sos' might be worth it.

    Given that these worms are getting to be pretty sophisticated in how they spread (IIS server exploit ->IE activeX exploit), and given that although MS does a 90% good job in patching them, the poor rate of patch (what? patch my computer? but it works fine), and total reluctance to switch to non-MS products (The VP of our company refused to switch from MS, even after the CERT warning. "Why would I want Mozilla or something? MS just released a patch for that problem you are talking about"), I'm STUNNED that someone hasn't gone nuts, and torched the Windows World(TM).

    No terrorist group, no crazy psychotic hackers, no insane foreign governments.

    No Russian organized crime group holding a corporation hostage.

    Nothing. Nada. Zilch.

    Strange.

    I still think its coming. Perhaps I'm just a pessismist, but I think that 'cyberwar' may still be on our horizon, and even if you, Ms. Super-Smart-Geek is able to protect your system, 90% of the windows world will not be able to.

    And instead of spam, we'll see permanent bios corruption, or something else, that will simply f*ck their computers.

    I'm scared of it, anyways. I only hope that it happens far enough in the future that I can earnestly say, "I can't fix that, I using Windows back in the 2000-era, I don't know anything about your XP-SE, your Longhorn, etc. . . "

    I spend too much of my time on service calls as it is, for my parents, for my officemates, for my relatives, and for my friends.

    I try to 'train' them on how to manage a system properly, but its honestly hopeless.

    I'm pretty savy, but back in the day when I ran them, my Windows systems STILL got screwed up sometimes (not often, but occasionally).

    I can totally understand (but not sympathize) when my sister comes back to me and her laptop has got a bazillion pop-up-ware things installed.

    I'll feel bad for her when/if her laptop gets trashed by a virus, but.... I told her to get a mac.....

    Oh well, ce la vie.

    I'll live through the storm, anyways, and so will my backups of the company data.

    --
    WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    1. Re:I'm surprised . . . by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      And instead of spam, we'll see permanent bios corruption, or something else, that will simply f*ck their computers.

      If you trust the metric that 60% of companies don't backup their data, there's no point in going straight for a bios scramble.

      The big money is in deleting data. The Most Evil Virus will go and secure-delete every file it can that's not required to propogate or spread. Leaving an empty windows machine is the desired result - otherwise your propogation vectors are hosed.

      If you thought 9/11 had a big impact on the US economy just wait 'till 60% of corporate america is without its business data.

      If the US government had half a clue there would be an NSA office on the Redmond campus (ditto for Cupertino, Santa Clara, etc.) doing something about this potential disaster. Recent evidence shows nothing is being done about it by certain players.

      Let's not kid ourselves, we can't have truely secure systems and sustain the current pace of technological improvement, but there is alot more that could be done today that just isn't, for the sake of saving a very small amount of money. Government regulation is good for these kinds of problems.

      Sure, it's a terrible socialist thing to have to do, but we got ourselves into this position by not supporting competition. Rememeber, competition prevents socialism - think about that the next time your bank goes through another merger.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  63. Re:All these virus description websites are lackin by Gogo+Dodo · · Score: 1

    You have to execute the attachment to get this particular variant of Bagle. It doesn't require Outlook.

  64. The problem with that by 0prime · · Score: 1

    Is that you reach the critical mass of users necessary to make writing a virus for Mac's worthwhile. If you have 10 people that see each other every few weeks/months spread over a large island and one gets an infection that can be airborn, it's not likely that the others will get it. If the island is tightly packed with thousands of people interacting with each other every day, many of them will get sick, and many more will be kept busy because of the sick. Computers are not all that different, you need a host and potential hosts that the virus can be spread to before it is "killed".

    When comparing the 3 biggies, Windows is a 10 acre field packed tight with pigs (many of them constantly sick because they don't take care of themselves), one of them gets a new cold and it spreads easilly (faster or slower depending on virulence). Linux is a 10 acre field that while not empty it isn't exactly packed tight with fowl, and there are many different species of fowl so if one does get sick the others near it don't catch it and help prevent its spread. Mac's are a 10 acre field with several peacocks.

    You pack in enough peacocks and there's going to be a lot of sick cocks.

    --
    I am not a *blank*, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.
  65. Oh come on, someone had to say it... by Tarential · · Score: 1

    Get Linux.

  66. Re:CVS w by einhverfr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    *sigh* Please don't release another anti-virus-virus. The last one was at least as much a pain as the one it was supposed to cure.

    Also many of the mass mailers do stop and try to disarm other mass mailers. This is not uncommon becuase it prevents the virus from being detected if someone doesn't update their AV until they find one that is old enough to be in the signature files.

    Such an Anti-virus-virus, would just be another of these viruses. No more or less.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  67. Way off topic... by nwbvt · · Score: 1
    You mean standard A4 size paper. How often is that used in the US? In the US and Canada, standard letter sized paper is 8.5 x 11. True, I could have specified that was what I was talking about, but as this conversation was based on the US changing systems, I thought it would be obvious. Sorry for making that mistake.

    Yes, North America could change standard paper sizes as well as measurement standards. But that could screw up many formated documents, paper holders, etc. All so you didn't have to learn that there are 12 inches in a foot. And if you think that is bad, expand that problem beyond paper. Construction supplies (say goodbye to those 2x4s), speed limits (not only would they have to be adjusted, but most cars have speedometers that display as the primary measure), mile markers (there are probably thousands of those littering the land), hell anything that has to do with some sort of measurement would have to be changed. Not just those tables in school books.

    --
    Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  68. Still off topic, I know, but I didn't start it by nwbvt · · Score: 1
    You do that. If of course you don't mind both memorizing twice as many digits as us and using paper that is 10 times the size of US standard letter paper.

    1cm = 10mm genius.

    Why don't you learn the metric system before you tell the rest of us to change.

    --
    Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  69. Next: Cisco Source Code As Attachment by Vexler · · Score: 1

    Recall the little incident a little while involving a mere 800 MB of Cisco IOS source being leaked to some dimwit Russians.

  70. SpamByte: Game Over, Spammers/Computer Crackers... by iamcf13 · · Score: 1

    The information in this post is the end result of many months of thought and software development. If you find the information below has merit, please, by all means take advantage of it and use it. This will be the only post of the actual information by me. All future posts of this material will consist of the URL pointer to this post. Should this post be accidentally or intentionally deleted, I will repost it in its entirety again and link to it as needed as explained above.

    The information in this post, if widely used, will effectively make spam and malware infestation of computer systems running Microsoft Windows impossible.

    Thank you for your consideration,

    Bryan Taylor
    iamcf13@hotpop.com
    SpamByte code: 7 (see below)

    ------- Begin information Below -------
    From http://www.cf13.com/

    CF13-SMTP(TM) / CF13-POP3(TM) Slashdot-Friendly Page

    What are they?
    A Shareware RFC821/RFC1939 compatible SMTP/POP3 server program for Microsoft(R) Windows.
    It was written in Microsoft(R) Visual C++. The UPX-compressed executable file
    containing the complete program is 130,048 bytes in size. A Freeware RFC1939 POP3 client
    program created in the above manner is 75,264 bytes in size.

    Who wrote them? Bryan Taylor, author of the MS-DOS/TURBO PASCAL program FILE-IT.

    Why were they written? To solve the twin problems of email spam and email malware.

    How does CF13-SMTP(TM) / CF13-POP3(TM) work?
    1) It is an all-in-one SMTP/POP3 email transport solution.
    2) It is simple to use and fast.
    3) It is extremely reliable when operating under nominal conditions.
    4) It is hostile to spammers and computer crackers.

    How does CF13-POP3(TM) work?
    1) It is hostile to spammers and computer crackers.
    2) It is simple to use and fast.
    3) It is extremely reliable when operating under nominal conditions.

    When are they available? They are available now. See next question for availability.

    Where are they available?
    CF13-SMTP(TM) / CF13-POP3(TM) is available here. CF13-POP3(TM) is available here.

    Original site is here. Mirror site is here.

    The ideas inside these two software computer programs are hereby declared patent
    free. These two software computer programs are publication of said ideas and thus
    said ideas become 'prior art' and are unpatentable either in whole or in part.

    Copyright 2004 Bryan Taylor -- All Rights Reserved -- http://www.cf13.com/
    Last Update: Tuesday, July 06, 2004, 11:19 Universal Coordinated Time

    -- SpamByte information below is used by both programs above to identify and filter out spam and malware --
    Startup banner from:
    http://www.cf13.com/cf13pop3.exe

    CF13-POP3(TM)
    Copyright 2004 Bryan Taylor -- All Rights Reserved
    http://www.cf13.com/
    Last Update: Tuesday, July 06, 2004, 11:19 Universal Coordinated Time

    LICENSE: FREEWARE! SHARE & ENJOY!
    PLEASE VIRUS CHECK THIS PROGRAM BEFORE MAKING COPIES FOR OTHERS.

    DISCLAIMER: USE THIS PROGRAM SOLELY AT YOUR OWN RISK!
    ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTIES WHATSOEVER!

    Note: Your use of this program rewards the creators of the SMTP/POP3 protocols.
    Your purchase and use of CF13-SMTP(TM) / CF13-POP3(TM) will reward the
    author for making that program available for use at http://www.cf13.com/
    and reduce Internet email abuse.

    Software should help people, bring people together, make stuff easier to do.
    -- Henrik S. Hansen

    usage: cf13pop3 svr port login pw SpamByte wantspam

    svr - server

  71. flesh tone mp3s? by EventHorizon · · Score: 1

    Sir, I am fascinated by this "flesh tone" view of sexually-marketed, techno-remixed pop music, and wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

  72. Cannot Be GPL by EventHorizon · · Score: 1

    Since this virus clearly links with proprietary code, it cannot be licensed under the GPL.

    I urge Windows users to migrate to a GPL kernel, where all kernel-level malware must be open source.

  73. A few thoughts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work in the anti-virus industry. While that does not grant me any special information above and beyond what you can easily find on the net. I do see this day in and day out. To date, the majority of 'intentions to infect' are for a gain greater than the destruction of the infected system.

    Just like viruses in the physical world, If one is created as a 'super-virus' it will not last long. A virus needs to to co-exsist with its host long enough to spread itself. If it 'kills' the host too soon, it can not spread effectively.

    Granted, an electronic virus has the benefit and ability to spread and destroy in seconds, even so, the virus will do itself no good to kill the host too quickly. Holding off the time to self destruct just gives the AV companies time to protect against it.

    Cat and mouse? definitely. It is a highly reactionary industry. Someone has to be the first to get infected, just like in the physical world. Does that mean that doctors create viruses to keep themselves in business? (slightly off-tangent)

    Will there be a let up in the future? yes (for viruses, trojans , and worms). I forsee when anything electronic that gets introduced to your computer will get placed into a virtual system, where it is executed and checked before getting passed along to the main system (like sandboxing, only better and more inclusive)

    The only other main problem is with system exploits. Blocking exploits will always depend on the company that created the OS. Even if you can protect against every virus, worm, or trojan, an exploit will always go in through a 'yet unkonwn' back door.

  74. Wouldn't that be nice by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Will there be a let up in the future? yes (for viruses, trojans , and worms). I forsee when anything electronic that gets introduced to your computer will get placed into a virtual system, where it is executed and checked before getting passed along to the main system (like sandboxing, only better and more inclusive)

    That would be swell, but the industry is moving away from such common-sense solutions like Java or Netscape provided to all-controlling remotely trusted and executed code, aka ActiveX.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  75. Re:CVS w by mgcarley · · Score: 1

    I think welchia was partly a "solution" to msblast wasn't it?

    --
    Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley