Slashdot Mirror


New Lubricant Leads To Faster Hard Drives

azav writes "We all know about Moore's Law as it applies to chip speed but little attention is publicly made to the challenges of increasing speed in hard drives. A recent discovery in polyester (yes, polyester, you disco baby) lubricants will allow for faster and longer lasting hard drives."

365 comments

  1. FIRST ANAL "HARD DRIVE" LUBRICANT POST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    nyah

    1. Re:FIRST ANAL "HARD DRIVE" LUBRICANT POST! by sqrt(2) · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      How can the first post be redundant!? He was the FIRST one to make a sex joke! If anything, all the ones AFTER this are redundant.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    2. Re:FIRST ANAL "HARD DRIVE" LUBRICANT POST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      How?

      Mods on crack. Thats how.

    3. Re:FIRST ANAL "HARD DRIVE" LUBRICANT POST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sex joke may be imaginative, but the "FIRST ... POST" part is what's redundant.

    4. Re:FIRST ANAL "HARD DRIVE" LUBRICANT POST! by chrono325 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Okay, so I use the RSS reader in Firefox, and it cuts off the headlines a bit, so all I saw was "New Lubricant Leads to Faster..." Its a sad sign of the times...

    5. Re:FIRST ANAL "HARD DRIVE" LUBRICANT POST! by Rev+Saxon · · Score: 1

      some of us prefer X ill have u know.

      --
      I am that much more enlightened and proportionally disillusioned
    6. Re:FIRST ANAL "HARD DRIVE" LUBRICANT POST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok its redundant, but i checked after i read this. my RSS reader column must be a tad wider and says
      "new lubricant leads to a faster hard..."

  2. Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lubricants and "Faster, Longer Lasting hard drives."

    Sounds like some of the spam I get every day... cue all the bad jokes.

    1. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I swear most slashdot readers must either be 15, or never have sex. Once someone uses the word lubricants, everyone gets giddy...

    2. Re:Wow... by sqrt(2) · · Score: 2, Funny

      Check, and check. Yup that's everyone.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    3. Re:Wow... by DrGonzo1138 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I can't even say titmouse without giggling like a school girl"
      -Homer Simpson

    4. Re:Wow... by boredMDer · · Score: 0

      Well I'm 17, and have, and I find it amusing.

      *shrug*

      My father's 48, and he finds it amusing as well.

    5. Re:Wow... by Bryan_W · · Score: 0, Redundant

      You must be new here

    6. Re:Wow... by Spudley · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You've got to admit that the innuendo in that headline is... um... somewhat unsubtle.

      To be honest, I always suspected the term "hard drive" was invented as a sick inside joke by computer geeks, (along with a few other very suspect phrases).

      But what really convinced me was when I went to South Africa and discovered that a 3.5" floppy disk is known over there as a "stiffy disk". Ostensibly, the original idea was to differentiate them from the older 5.25" floppies, but you've got to admit that whoever came up with that one must have known what he was doing.

      I'm not usually one to laugh at blatant innuendo, but the first few times I heard that phrase being used, it absolutely cracked me up - not just for the phrase itself, but for the fact that no-one else seemed to get the joke. To them the phrase is completely natural: A South African computer geek can get away with telling people that he's got a stiffy in his pocket, and it won't even raise a smirk.

      (having said that, it's been a while since I've used a stif... uh, a 3.5" floppy, so I can't be sure the phrase is still current - SA readers, feel free to correct me)

      --
      (Spudley Strikes Again!)
    7. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the fact that you just had to share that with us all pretty much confirms your age :)

    8. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      My father's 48, and he finds it amusing as well.

      He's probably never had sex then.
    9. Re:Wow... by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Here I was, ready to whip out one of the obvious jokes--I mean we've got "lubricants" + "faster" + "longer-lasting" + "hard drive."

      [Rubs chin, stares at wall.]

      Nope. This vein of sophomoric humor has run it's course.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    10. Re:Wow... by mikael · · Score: 3, Funny

      Lubricants and "Faster, Longer Lasting hard drives."

      And always remember to use protection. You wouldn't want to catch a nasty virus.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    11. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, I don't know. I think a lot of people just go through a phase where sex is first funny because it's so taboo and mysterious, then it's not funny because it's become such an important thing in life. Then once the hormone fire fades a bit, and the experience has lost anything really new or novel, it becomes funny again once one can take an objective look at how stupid it all really is. There just seems to be a social stigma about admitting sex has become more amusing than lustfull to someone.

    12. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yup. The jokes just write themselves here.

      ~~~

    13. Re:Wow... by Jeremi · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I'm not usually one to laugh at blatant innuendo, but the first few times I heard that phrase being used, it absolutely cracked me up - not just for the phrase itself, but for the fact that no-one else seemed to get the joke


      I'm told that Australians have a similar reaction when they hear people talking about getting "root access"...

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    14. Re:Wow... by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I swear most slashdot readers must either be 15, or never have sex. Once someone uses the word lubricants, everyone gets giddy... "

      Giddy? Nah. I see a bunch of people trying to be a comedian, though.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    15. Re:Wow... by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Funny

      *But what really convinced me was when I went to South Africa and discovered that a 3.5" floppy disk is known over there as a "stiffy disk". Ostensibly, the original idea was to differentiate them from the older 5.25" floppies, but you've got to admit that whoever came up with that one must have known what he was doing.*

      in finland, a 5.25" floppy is called 'lerppu'(roughly translates to 'floppy'). 3.5" being called 'korppu'(translates to a hard biscuit like thingy).

      too bad korppu doesn't sound so fun as stiffy..

      well.. "uptime"...

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    16. Re:Wow... by 10000000000000000000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      To be honest, I always suspected the term "hard drive" was invented as a sick inside joke by computer geeks Yeah, I've long suspected the same about pilots and the "cockpit" :P

    17. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, "root" does have an entirely different meaning to those umop-apisdn australians...

    18. Re:Wow... by azav · · Score: 1

      Well, I DO try.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    19. Re:Wow... by azav · · Score: 3, Funny

      And in South Africa, White Out is NOT called White Out.

      Forget exactly what it is called though.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    20. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      White Out is NOT called White Out.

      Forget exactly what it is called though.


      Get Whitey Out?

    21. Re:Wow... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lubricants and "Faster, Longer Lasting hard drives."

      Seeing as how a lot of them will be stuffed full of porn, it seems somehow appropriate.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    22. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other day this guy who checked slashdot was leaving the computer lab with his friends. He was talking about how a pack of condoms he just got from a health center should last a lifetime.

    23. Re:Wow... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Funny

      And in South Africa, White Out is NOT called White Out.
      Forget exactly what it is called though.

      Correction fluid?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    24. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No more smell of burning rubber....

    25. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the joy stick ...

    26. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tippex. It's not specific to SA though - Just a generised trademark. British in origin, I think?

    27. Re:Wow... by Frogbert · · Score: 1
      And in South Africa, White Out is NOT called White Out.
      Forget exactly what it is called though.


      Correction fluid?


      Liquid Paper?
    28. Re:Wow... by nofx_3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thats some kinda Pair of Ducks. Either that or we have a futurama type situation on our hands.
      "I did do the nasty in the pasty."
      -Philip J. Fry

      -kaplanfx

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
    29. Re:Wow... by nofx_3 · · Score: 1

      Add to this once the poopdeck on ships.

      -kaplanfx

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
    30. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it was probably the 3-pack. I've always wondered about the number of condoms in a pack. I've seen 3, 5, 10, 20, and 50.

    31. Re:Wow... by Cynikal · · Score: 2

      well im far beyond 15, but the words "faster", "longer", "hard", and "lubricants" in the same sentence does make me laugh a bit.

    32. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Technically, your existence is evidence that your mother had sex, not your "father" ...

    33. Re:Wow... by Kumkwat · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here (NZ) its called *twink* :)

    34. Re:Wow... by falzer · · Score: 5, Funny

      The mailman, on the other hand, didn't find it funny at all.

    35. Re:Wow... by dcam · · Score: 3, Informative

      Australians also laugh when Europeans come over and start talking about routers, pronounced as rooters. For the same reason.

      --
      meh
    36. Re:Wow... by inflex · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Having also lived in ZA for a few years, the other thing that cracked me up was the way they pronounce 'router'. In ZA, they pronounce it as 'r-oo-ter', as if you were pronouncing 'hooters'. In Australia, 'root' is another term for sex. I personally preferred to pronounce it as 'r-out-er'.

      PLD.

    37. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ONLY a 3.5" stiffy? Dude... :)

    38. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being the brand name it was introduced as. Although I haven't heard it used for a while - the American term 'white out' seems to have taken over...

    39. Re:Wow... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well you root for your team your way. I'll keep doing it my way thank you very much.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    40. Re:Wow... by NoMaster · · Score: 1

      I have arguements about this with ... well, everybody! Co-workers, customers, etc.

      If you follow the roots (there's that word again!) of the word, "root-ers" is the correct pronunciation. Because a router "routes" ("roots" Tee-hee!) traffic - it sends it on a path. Now, if it routed ("r-ow-ted", not nearly so funny as "root" ;-) traffic, it'd be turning it aside...

      Just because you have a homophonic dislike of the pronunciation doesn't mean it's incorrect...

      As well, calling it a "root-er" just seems to piss people off, which is an admirable aim in itself ;-)

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    41. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really, most geeks have small dicks, hence there is not a need for lubricants........

    42. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me you don't get giddy at the word dongle.

    43. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't discount immaculate conception here

    44. Re:Wow... by KingPunk · · Score: 1

      haha. you're the milkmans. hes not your "father"
      hes just your "dad"
      ;)

      ..either way, hes sexless. poor old man.

    45. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a surrogate MOther, you insensitive clod!

    46. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That reminds me, I was chatting with someone from NZ once, and she didn't know what "twinkies" were! Are they not imported?

    47. Re:Wow... by CJSpil · · Score: 1

      Route is just another one of those words whose American pronunciation us UK English folks find highly amusing.

      Other examples include Buoy (Boy) and Quay (Key)... granted that the UK pronunciation of buoy is not exactly intuitive but how you manage to get "Beweee" out if it is beyond me.

      --
      For people who like peace and quiet. A phoneless cord!
    48. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That reminds me, I was chatting with someone from NZ once, and she didn't know what "twinkies" were! Are they not imported?

      Not unless you can feed them to sheep, or make hip boots out of them.

      I suppose they could begin importing them. They could then distribute them to the Maori's, and then watch the keel from the overdose of high fructose corn syrup, and be finally done with that mess.

      (I am only kidding...i am ashamed, but i couldn't resist)

    49. Re:Wow... by Elledan · · Score: 1

      rout, pronounced 'ra ut': cut a groove in a surface.

      router, pronounced 'ra u ta': a power tool with a shaped cutter, used in carpentry.

      router, pronounced 'ruu ta': computing a device which forwards data packets to the appropriate parts of a network.

      Is the Australian version of English really that different?

      --
      Site & blog: http://www.mayaposch.com
    50. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tipex -- after the trade-name of a version of correction fluid.

    51. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      root = 'fuck' in Australia, so when an Aussie happens to mention the words 'mad rooter', they're not referring to a buggered up packet forwarder.

    52. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your pronounciations are for 'American English'. Listen to your Northern brothers for a mostly correct pronounciation of 'British English'.

    53. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, perhaps once.

    54. Re:Wow... by RefriedBean · · Score: 1

      Indeed, 3.5" Floppies are still widely called "Stiffies" in South Africa. As for white-out, it's usually called "Tip-ex" (since thats the most famous/widely used brand)

    55. Re:Wow... by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Informative

      We Aussies also have a very different meaning for the word "fanny" than you do in the US.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    56. Re:Wow... by yowi · · Score: 1

      You've got to admit that the innuendo in that headline is... um... somewhat unsubtle.

      I thought an innuendo was an italian suppository, what's it doing in a headline.......

      --
      Why don't the headlines ever read 'Psychic wins lottery'
    57. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never seen a twinkie here in Australia, and from what I can gather I never want to.

    58. Re:Wow... by It'sYerMam · · Score: 1

      Europeans laugh when people come over here and start talking about rowters and prohsessoars - but that's just pronunciation, nothing to do with innuendo!

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    59. Re:Wow... by It'sYerMam · · Score: 1
      Wow... that cracked me up more than any of the jokes previously... "Beweee" Tee hee!
      I always used to pronounce it Kwayside, but my Grandmother lived by the sea, so I was quickly corrected.

      What pisses me off is when an English friend starts saying "prohsessoar"

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    60. Re:Wow... by lachlan76 · · Score: 2, Funny

      When my friends ask me how to set up a LAN, pronouning router as root-ah at least gets their attention ;)

      I thought root == fuck everywhere in the world.
      Maybe Linux system aministration is just one big fucking joke then?

    61. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of an old geek joke...

      Q: What's the difference between a woman and a computer?

      A: A woman won't take a 3 1/2 inch floppy.

    62. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's the queers. They're in it with the aliens. They're building landing strips for gay Martians, I swear to God

      Where can we meet these gay Martians? I'm very interested in this!!!!!!!!!
    63. Re:Wow... by freqres · · Score: 1

      So goes the saying...

      Mother's baby, father's maybe.

      --
      Rampant Ninja related crimes these days...Whitehouse is not the exception
    64. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh man, I wish I had mod points. Thanks for the laugh.

    65. Re:Wow... by fstrauss · · Score: 1

      It's called Tipex

      --

      ----
      Some people are good with words, others, .... erm..... ....
    66. Re:Wow... by greebly · · Score: 1

      I am so totally going to have to leave my "got root?" hat at home if I ever visit Australia...

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy, and taste good with ketchup.
    67. Re:Wow... by orasio · · Score: 1

      A middle "S" would certainly improve sales.

    68. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anti-Apartied fluid.

    69. Re:Wow... by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it's rarely used in the US; so when it is used, it's usually the more technical term of "animal reproductive mating".

      In US slang, "root" is often a reference to a penis, much like "tool".

      Nice pun btw. "big fucking joke". heh.

    70. Re:Wow... by jrp2 · · Score: 1

      I had a similar situation when in the UK and my hosts suggested I dress up a bit for meeting with a large customer. I said "no problem, I packed some nice pants and suspenders that I can wear". They died laughing and I was not sure why. They were quite pleased when I showed up with "nice trousers with braces".

      I guess "pants" are underwear and "suspenders" hold up your socks in the UK. They had a completely different image in mind when I said that ;)

      --
      The only athletic sport I ever mastered was backgammon - Douglas William Jerrold
    71. Re:Wow... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      Haha, that's great!

    72. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suspenders go with a garter to make up ladies undergarments.

      Your hosts had a vision of you in drag!

    73. Re:Wow... by ravenshrike · · Score: 0

      Aw, come on. What's not to like about a food mainly made up of yellow dye #5, air, and sugar.

    74. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Titmouse! Teeheeeheee!

  3. Big deal... by Junta · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am constantly bombarded about emails promising 'longer lasting hard drives' something about pills or herbs, this is nothing new.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  4. When using lubricants... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember to always bring a towel

  5. not as important by skinny.net · · Score: 0

    are we worried about speed when we can stripe 14 disks for no more than the cost of disks?

    we can't do that inexpensively with cpus.

  6. Hmm by bigberk · · Score: 2, Funny
    "lubricants will allow for faster and longer lasting ..."
    Funny, my girlfriend agrees!
    1. Re:Hmm by pHatidic · · Score: 1
      Funny, my girlfriend agrees!

      I thought JenniCam got shut down?

    2. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, my girlfriend agrees!

      Agrees, huh? she must be your right-hand man...

    3. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > > "lubricants will allow for faster and longer lasting ..." > Funny, my girlfriend agrees! Try some foreplay too.

    4. Re:Hmm by NanoGator · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Funny, my girlfriend agrees! "

      Let us know when she lets ya try it!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  7. Maybe they just need some... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Funny

    of this?

    1. Re:Maybe they just need some... by Tandoori+Haggis · · Score: 1

      Bloody port scanners!!!

      --
      My hyperlinks aren't worth the paper they're printed on.
    2. Re:Maybe they just need some... by SpecBear · · Score: 1

      Personally, I prefer Eros. Much like iocaine powder, it's odorless, colorless, and flavorless. These are all positive traits for a lubricant. Very much unlike iocaine powder, it will not instantly kill whoever ingests it. This is also a positive trait for a lubricant.

    3. Re:Maybe they just need some... by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1
      Then you should link to the free sample

      I love their disclaimer...
      (All information will be used for mailing purposes only and will not be distributed to any outside organizations. Except maybe the paramedics if your free trial gets out of hand.)
      Then again this is /. so here's the other link
  8. My hard drive speed... by Cornelius+Chesterfie · · Score: 5, Funny

    With this, my hard drive speed increased a lot, if you know what I mean, and I think you do!

    However, I don't know about "longer lasting". I guess it depends on the person. Mine becomes a floppy after 2 minutes.

    1. Re:My hard drive speed... by Lightman_73 · · Score: 1

      Mine becomes a floppy after 2 minutes.

      Man, you've got some serious problem ... :D

  9. Lubricants, Longer...Faster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot pun gods, you may now begin!

  10. Hmm? by sqrt(2) · · Score: 4, Funny

    What are you selling? Hard drives or sex jelly?

    --
    If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    1. Re:Hmm? by ThePuD · · Score: 1, Funny

      this is the least subtle sex joke ever. i love it.

    2. Re:Hmm? by drdink · · Score: 3, Informative

      It comes from the Family Guy Y2K episode. There is a guy in a chicken suit handing out coupons, and the chicken tells Peter about Y2K. Peter replies with "What are you selling? Chicken or sex jelly?"

      --
      Beware, Nugget is watching... See?
    3. Re:Hmm? by ThePuD · · Score: 0

      that's slightly disappointing

    4. Re:Hmm? by sqrt(2) · · Score: 1

      Thank you, 2 digit UID. I was afraid that no one was going to get it.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    5. Re:Hmm? by ezzewezza · · Score: 1

      I think you're just being irrational here.

  11. More importantly by dmayle · · Score: 2, Funny

    New lubricant leads to faster pr0n on hard drives...

    </ducks>

    1. Re:More importantly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we need "RAM DRIVES" bigger and like a 2 dollar hoe cheap...

  12. Faster Hard Drives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hard Drive Speed doesn't seem to be the problem... S-ATA suits me just fine.

    What I really worry about is hard drives not getting any bigger. It seems progress has stopped at about 350 - 400gig and no prospect of going anywhere.

    1. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I should imagine that a single hard drive, large enough to hold all the data the user will ever need and reliable enough to outlast the user is the last thing hard drive companies want to make.

    2. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, mod this insightful.

      I am still waiting to be able to build a cheap multi-TB RAID 3 array. Hard drive prices have stalled in mid-descent lately. When am I likely to be able to build a 2 TB RAID 3 array (4 x 400 MB drives plus 1 parity drive plus controller) for under $1K?

    3. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by damiam · · Score: 4, Insightful
      SATA is the speed of the bus from the hard drive, not the actual drive. You'd currently need a RAID cluster of drives to fill the SATA bus.

      And hard drive speed does matter, a huge amount. Unless you have a crapload of RAM and everything you use is cached, 90% of the time you spend waiting for programs to start up or large files to be read is waiting for the HD to read the data. A faster HD can make a computer feel much snappier than a slow one.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    4. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 1

      Uh, I can remember when 150 or 175GB was the biggest you could buy. Ya know, that was what, a whole 6 months ago or something?

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    5. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When am I likely to be able to build a 2 TB RAID 3 array (4 x 400 MB drives plus 1 parity drive plus controller) for under $1K?

      I'm sure you meant 400 GB drives...it's not hard to fit ~2.0 GB on a single drive these days. =P

    6. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by gerardrj · · Score: 4, Insightful

      User data needs will always increase.
      I remember spending a boatload of cash on a 4GB drive about 6 or 7 years ago thinking that would be more than enough storage for at least the next decade.
      I've now got a 160GB boot drive and 1/2 TB array for storing media files (DV video, music, photos, etc).

      I don't think it will be too much longer before people stop keeping physical files in the home, and instead scan all of their receipts, bills and statements as scanned images on their computers.

      If you think video takes up a lot of space now, wait until all consumer electronics use HD video and storage needs increase by 4x.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    7. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by Tesko · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, no, the biggest one out (the 400gb one) has 5 80GB platters. But another major manufacturer is using 100GB platters in one if it's hard drives. I can't remember the manufacturers/hard drive models for the life of me. I can't wait for 20,000 RPM S-ATA Drives to hit the streets.

    8. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by xsupergr0verx · · Score: 1

      Wow, the first comment that isn't a penis joke. That deserves modding up regardless of content.

      But yeah, SATA rocks it to Russia (not Soviet Russia.)

      --

      Click here for a free picture of an iPod!
    9. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 4, Funny
      "What I really worry about is hard drives not getting any bigger."

      The women keep telling us 'size doesn't matter'.

    10. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by at_18 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hard drives are pathetically slow. A seek takes 10 milliseconds, that's a factor of almost a million slower than a random memory access. The biggest noticeable delays (boot up time, firefox load time, open office load time, etc.) are all caused by the slow hard disk. Transfer speeds, which are now approaching 50MB/sec, are good enough. And size is still going up: two years ago 120 GB, one year ago 250 GB, this year 400 GB. No sign of slowing.

    11. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by localhost00 · · Score: 1
      Uh, I can remember when 150 or 175GB was the biggest you could buy. Ya know, that was what, a whole 6 months ago or something?

      Actually, I seem to recall Western Digital having a 250GB HDD as early as last fall.

      --

      Calling atheism and agnosticism a religion is like calling bald a hair color.

    12. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by Compholio · · Score: 1

      Ha! I have you beat by over half with my 4.5 ms seek time!

      http://www.westerndigital.com/en/products/Products .asp?DriveID=65

    13. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by DrMrLordX · · Score: 1

      Anything that lengthens the lifespan of storage devices, along with improving their reliability, is a good thing. The speed increase is not all that important.

    14. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much p0rn can one AC really need?!

    15. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by David+Horn · · Score: 1

      Slightly off topic, but something I'm curious about: How long can the average hard drive be expected to last? The one in my web server has now clocked up over 25,000 hours and although it's backed up, I'm beginning to wonder how much longer it's going to last.

      What's the average life of a (40GB) drive, and should I be thinking about replacing it?

      --
      PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
    16. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      What's the average life of a (40GB) drive, and should I be thinking about replacing it?

      Here is a good place to start looking. There are way too many factors to determine its life expectancy besides whether or not you have a DeathStar or otherwise prematurely death disk. Some disks last one week, others last decades.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    17. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by Spad · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but deep down we know they want a 2Tb RAID array.

    18. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, relaibility seems to be the problem.

      I have a bunch of under 6 gig drives that are still running strong, some of them almost 15 years old and still reliable and spinning 24/7 in remote locations.

      I have also within the past 3 years thrown away more "new" IBM, Maxtor, and fujitsu drives than I can shake a stick at(new as in 24 months old or less). they all die with the horrible tick-tick-tick death after running for a few months.. and usually after the insanely short warrenty ran out. (less than 5 years on a drive = crap quality drive)

      I want a hard drive that I know will work for at LEAST 24 months without any problems at all.... 36 months should be the realistic target but cince quality in computers is spiraling down faster than the quality of carnival junk I cant ask too much.

      screw faster, I want RELIABLE. give me reliability of drives in the 1996-1998 ERA. everything cince they broke the 15 Gig barrier has been utter and complete crap. I even see it in the high end scsi drives... 9gig U160 drives just dont fail (A small sample here of only 100 drives spinning right now) while I have had a 20% failure rate on 18 gig drives. same brand, same equipment... the 9 gig drives are massively more reliable..

      anyone know what brand of hard drive is not crap like the fujitsu and Maxtors? (dont care about IBM, they gave up.)

    19. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by joe_plastic · · Score: 1

      Yep it's seeks that hurt. Tim Bray observed something interesting from the reiser4 benchmarks. That within 1 Gig of data you can do about 120 to 130 random seeks. Within 3 Gigs of data you can only do about 90 to 105 random seeks a second. Thats why having good readahead sizes and ordering your seeks can be really helpful. At 10,000 RPM it's 166.7 RPS -- thats 6 milliseconds to do a complete revolution. So the latency from that is on average 3 milliseconds. Reading 150K Bytes at a time would be another 3 milliseconds so the other 4 should be the track shifting time and other overhead. Upping the RPMs should decrease the rotational latency and read time even if it didn't effect track switching. Of course if you don't also increase track seeking time than you can only double the amount of seeks you can do in second even if you make a 100,000 RPM or faster drive...

    20. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you make a 100,000 RPM or faster drive

      Plus, you'll have the advantage that the cats can no longer tip over the tower case, and your laptops will just hang on the edge of the desk, precessing, rather than fall off.

    21. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations! You have the first post to not blatantly make a sex joke or a joke about someone else's sex joke. (Yes I realize the irony in that this won't fit into that category.)

    22. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by theparanoidcynic · · Score: 1

      You think your fancy new SATA is hot shit don't you? Feh. I've been getting 5ms from SCSI for years.

      --
      Only in a Slashdot fantasy can a Slackware install turn into several hours of sex . . . . .
    23. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? I think the opposite. Or was that supposed to be funny?

      In the consumer sector, disk space keeps on doubling regularly, while speed doesn't get anywhere. ATA133 to S-ATA (i.e. 133 to 150 MB/s theoretical maximum bus speed AFAIK) isn't all that impressive in comparison.

      It's kinda embarrassing that the computer industry still relies on moving and rattling magnetic stuff inside our hightech electronic boxes.

  13. Drive Heat by Klar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My laptop runs cool, except for the left palm rest, where the hard drive is inside the case. After a few hours of gaming, it can be VERY hot. Would better lube allow for portable drives to run cooler?

    1. Re:Drive Heat by esanbock · · Score: 1

      Probably not. The heat is caused by the circuitry.

    2. Re:Drive Heat by imsabbel · · Score: 4, Informative

      most likely your GPU or the end of the cpu heatpipe is there...
      No current 2.5" HD needs more than 5W during normal usage, which is WAY lower than many other components...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    3. Re:Drive Heat by Hooya · · Score: 2, Funny

      so, you're a left hander.

      i must have missed the memo to start calling it *gaming* ;)

    4. Re:Drive Heat by iamplupp · · Score: 1

      nope, he is right. i have the same issue with my thinkpad and i know for a fact no other components than the HD resides in that part of the laptop.

    5. Re:Drive Heat by Tandoori+Haggis · · Score: 1

      If your laptop can take it you could try adding more ram.

      --
      My hyperlinks aren't worth the paper they're printed on.
    6. Re:Drive Heat by kwalker · · Score: 1

      Oh, don't think 5v doesn't generate quite a bit of heat after a while. On my iBook, the hard disk gets by far the hottest of the whole system, and I know it's the disk because I've taken the bloody thing apart and replaced the disk with a larger one. I've also got a 2.5" disk in a USB/FireWire enclosure and after about 20-30 minutes of heavy or constant disk utilization, the disk drive will heat up noticably, sometimes uncomfortably hot. I've taken to not using my iBook on my lap for more than an hour because it starts to get annoyingly hot.

      --
      ... And so it comes to this.
    7. Re:Drive Heat by rsmith-mac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The OP may be right, but so is the Grandparent. Hard drives don't consume a lot of energy, so in a second, they simply can't generate more than 5W of heat, due to the whole "conservation of energy" thing. However, since hard drives don't put out a lot of heat, there's not a lot of effort to cool them, and they can build up heat to be hotter than other components, making the OP correct too. Without more info though, it's hard to say who's right.

    8. Re:Drive Heat by Dahan · · Score: 1
      Hard drives don't consume a lot of energy, so in a second, they simply can't generate more than 5W of heat, due to the whole "conservation of energy" thing.

      FWIW, a watt is a unit of power, not of energy (heat). A hard drive that uses 5 watts of power can't generate more than 5 joules of heat per second.

      My laptop hard drive gets pretty hot because there's no ventilation in the little carrier that the drive goes in. Cooling seems to mainly be by conduction to the case, which doesn't really work that well.

    9. Re:Drive Heat by cerberusss · · Score: 1
      most likely your GPU or the end of the cpu heatpipe is there

      Nope, it's the disk. For Dell D600 trouble, see here, here and here.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    10. Re:Drive Heat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      imsabbel's reply to your post is correct. But to answer your question, probably not. A better media/lube system in a hard drive makes it more reliable. Lube is meant to protect the media when any head-disk contact occurs. Theoretically since the head flys during operation, it should never hit the disk, but it does due to lower and lower flying heights (much less than 1 microinch), shock/vibration, and contaminants.

      But power is based on how much it's seeking/seek velocity/VCM inertia (it uses quite a bit of power since it has to accelerate very quickly) and motor speed. The controller doesn't use as much energy, but if you are constantly reading or writing to the disk, it may cause the chips to warm up more.

      Laptop drives are highly optimized to shut down and reduce speed as much as possible to use less power, and as imsabbel said, your other devices are the main hosers of energy.

    11. Re:Drive Heat by raygundan · · Score: 1

      If he has a recent Dell, the OP is probably right. The D500s have the HDD under the front left handrest (oddly, the headphone jacks are actually *attached* to the HDD), and it gets annoyingly warm with use. The vent fans (presumably where the CPU and GPU heatpipes are going to dump their heat) are elsewhere.

  14. Come on by Legion303 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Hard". "Lubricant". "Faster". How the hell are the trolls supposed to twist this into a quick laugh? You guys are making it too difficult.

    1. Re:Come on by Junta · · Score: 1

      You forgot 'longer' (even the full 'longer lasting' makes sense). Ah the juvenille humor potential..

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:Come on by azav · · Score: 1

      The FUNNY thing is that I took that "faster, longer" text from the actual article itself.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    3. Re:Come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing funny about the slashduh editors not being able to create editorial content.

  15. Great, but... by PingKing · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Far greater than faster drives, of course, would be drives with no moving parts.

    No wear, faster transfer (no seek time!) and silent. Should this be the way research should be going?

    --

    Patriotism - the last resort of scoundrels.
    1. Re:Great, but... by aspx · · Score: 3, Informative

      Um, no moving parts does not translate to no wear. Your Pentium IV CPU will eventually let you down, even if you use it under ideal conditions. Granted, well-designed electronic components tend to be more reliable than mechanical components.

    2. Re:Great, but... by spuzzzzzzz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's plenty of research and progress in this direction: flash drives. They're still ridiculously small and expensive compared to normal hard drives but give them some more years. After all, flash, unlike hard drives, is affected by Moore's law.

      --

      Don't you hate meta-sigs?
    3. Re:Great, but... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Insightful

      good idea. then we just have to worry about the finite witeability of Flash memory.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    4. Re:Great, but... by ameoba · · Score: 1

      I'll be extrememly disappointed if we get fast, reliable, affordable solid-state storage devices and people insist on calling them "hard drives".

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    5. Re:Great, but... by diamondsw · · Score: 1

      Chart hard drive capacity over the years. If memory serves, it has outpaced Moore's Law. Remember, back in the mid-80's, your memory size and disk size were fairly close, or a factor of 10 at most. Today, power users have maybe 1GB of RAM, but 300GB of hard drive space.

      People have been looking for replacements for winchester technology for years, and it has never happened. Optical, flash, etc. They have different uses (obviously), but they don't reach the all-around usefulness of a magnetic hard drive.

      --
      I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
    6. Re:Great, but... by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 1

      What, you think they'll be a liquid or something?

    7. Re:Great, but... by Throtex · · Score: 2, Funny

      Remember, back in the mid-80's, your memory size and disk size were fairly close, or a factor of 10 at most.

      You insensitive clod! Back in the mid-80s I had 64k of RAM (or 128k depending on what mode I started up in), and zero hard disk space. If you applied Moore's law to double the capacity, we'd still have no hard drive space!

      pfft! pfft I say! :)

    8. Re:Great, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Far greater than faster drives, of course, would be drives with no moving parts. No wear, faster transfer (no seek time!) and silent. Should this be the way research should be going?"

      I just bought a USB flash-memory "keyring" device for $20 which has 3 times more storage capacity than the hard-disk I bought just 10 years previously. No moving parts, no seek time, silent.

      The largest such devices now have more storage capacity than the hard-disk I bought 5 years ago. Again, this is a device that you can carry in a shirt pocket and not notice it, not a block of iron and steel that fills a 3.5" drive bay.

      Looks like things are going in the right direction...

    9. Re:Great, but... by MrNemesis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Research is already there, RAMdrive products just need volume to become economical.

      Curtis SSD http://www.curtisssd.com/products/drives/ make solid state hard drives that appear as a SCSI hard drive. They're phenomenally fast, and I imagine phenomenally expensive.

      However, they are of course volatile, so you need to stream your OS and data from a tape of HDD into cache before you boot the machine. And again, capacities are limited to ~15GB, so they're only of any real use as swap and/or database filesystems (possibly as root FS if you're looking for very snappy applications as well... hell, you could even RAID0 the bastards ;).

      As mentioned above, MRAM (non-volatile RAM with pretty much unlimited write, unlike flash based technologies) is an attempt to do away with the "load your OS before you boot" problem, but I don't think it'll appear in the consumer arena for awhile yet, and I imagine it'll be similarly priced to the Curtis drives today.

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    10. Re:Great, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean "Moore's Law" isn't really a law? By the way people through it around you would think it was a law of nature.

    11. Re:Great, but... by DarkMan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not meaning to be (overly) pedantic, but that's not wear. Wear is caused by bits rubbing over each other.

      This is not just a semantic difference. The failure modes of silicon chips are mostly diffusion limited - that it, the metal conductors expand, the pn junctions become more diffuse, vacencies develop in the silicon, and so on. The failure mode of a part which wears is generally that the wear causes a mechanical weakness in a part till it breaks, bends, or is otherwise no longer functional.

      This difference is reflected in the time to failure of different devices. Electronics show a bathtub curve - essentially, manufacturing defects show up in young failures, then after a period (around 8 - 10 months), there is no intrinsitic source of failure other than the (slow) diffusion limited modes, so there number of devices failing drop very low, until that mode dominates, at sometime around 8-10 years after manufacture.

      Mechanical parts also show young failures, but, due to wearing, they do not last as long, and the rate of failures does not drop as low. The exact duration is determined by the type of use of the part. For example, this motor here *clunk* has bushes and brushes that have a design life of 1 months constant use, which translates to about 4 years with typical uses patterns. On the other hand, the motor in a washing machine is rated for something like 2 years constant use. The washing machine motor has bigger bushes and brushes, which are designed to last longer.

      I could go on, but a) it gets boring rapidly, and b) I'd have to did out some notes on it, and cba.

      In 10 years with computers, which gives experince with devices up to 20 years old, I have seen 1 case of failure in a componant over 3 months old that was not caused (directly or indirectly [0]) by mechanical wear.

      Having said all that, Flash memory is not as reliable as most electronics, as it has a particular structure that causes insulator breakdown after around 1000 writes. But that's not _really_ wear, although I'm told it has a similar failure profile.

      Not moving parts does not translate to no deterioration, but it _does_ mean no wear.

      [0] Couple of times, power supply fans died, power supply overheats, fails, and frys electronics.

    12. Re:Great, but... by Qrlx · · Score: 1

      In 10 years with computers, which gives experince with devices up to 20 years old, I have seen 1 case of failure in a componant over 3 months old that was not caused (directly or indirectly [0]) by mechanical wear.

      That number seems a little low, but generally I agree. Moving parts are always fighting a war of attrition with interia.

      I've seen plenty of older (PCI or earlier) video cards thta died on power-up, causing the magic smoke to escape, and modems still seem to be fairly unreliable. And power supplies, though I suppose you could blame the fan.

      Does lightning count as "mechanical wear?" :)

    13. Re:Great, but... by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      I dunno about mid-80s, but in the late 80s I had about 512k of RAM and 40MB of hard drive space. Now I have 1.25GB of RAM and 80GB of hard drive space, almost exactly the same ratio.

      If your ratio is too big, buy more memory! ;-)

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    14. Re:Great, but... by maximilln · · Score: 1

      But that's not _really_ wear, although I'm told it has a similar failure profile

      You're right, it is pedantic. "wear" would be physical degradation without a necessary change in chemical composition. Component failure would be a result of chemical degradation.

      vacencies develop in the silicon

      Assuming that's a breakdown of crystalline structure is that physical wear? Technically the chemical composition of the unit cells are still the same in the crystalline lattice but the macroscopic crystal now has discrepencies. Unless the breakdown of the crystal lattice is caused by a change in oxidation state of a component of the crystal. That would be a chemical event which leads to physical aberration.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
  16. Attention slashdot management by bigberk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The first twenty posts for this article should prove as valuable for marketing research of slashdot readership. You should be posting pornography, not links to tech articles. Yes, I'm kind of joking but kind of not.

    1. Re:Attention slashdot management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is where I expect autopr0n to reply with a "been there, done that, check my website" post.

    2. Re:Attention slashdot management by xsupergr0verx · · Score: 0, Troll

      Are you crazy? This is "teh INTARWEB!!111" Pornography is nearly impossible to find.

      --

      Click here for a free picture of an iPod!
    3. Re:Attention slashdot management by M51DPS · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that will work really well.... up until hotbabes.com experiences the slashdot effect.

    4. Re:Attention slashdot management by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      But autopr0n.com is down and has been for at least a week. Not that I go there often or anything... err.... nevermind.

    5. Re:Attention slashdot management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a way they do. You have idiots like ninenine here pushing his porno site everywhere. I have seen number of others.

    6. Re:Attention slashdot management by Scarblac · · Score: 1

      You should be posting pornography, not links to tech articles.

      Most people here would basically never pay for software. But PAY for PORN? That's just fantasy land, why would you do that?

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    7. Re:Attention slashdot management by GamerGeek · · Score: 1

      forget it.slashdot.org

      sex.slashdot.org

      or

      porn.slashdot.org

      no no even better

      tits.slashdot.org

      just to get the "it" typos :)

  17. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Both my 4 months old Western Digital drives have started horrible loud high-pitch whine.

    1. Re:Good by zogger · · Score: 1

      Didn't they just re-up their warranties to three years? Or are you stuck with a shorter warranty.

      With that said, I find the older the hard drive, the more reliable it is, some exceptions I have read, but I've never seen it, ALL my sub gigabyte hard drives are just fine, still work. I even have one that had an industrial "health" magnet placed next to it, a toshiba satellite 115 laptop, it was seriously b0rken when I got it from a friend as scrap, made terrible noise, wouldn't boot. I mean it sounded like the read head was scraping along the platter, SCRRRRATCH over and over. I thought what the heck, let's see what will happen, I just left it turned on to see what would happen, after several days it finally got to a semi bootable state where I could run scandisk, after almost two weeks of running scandisk it's fine now, works normally. I was able to recover almost all her data and send it to her, now I got a nifty "old" laptop. It would be a nice scrappage if more ram and another battery wasn't so expensive.

    2. Re:Good by TLSPRWR · · Score: 1

      Is this supposed to be funny? Because mine really do.

      I have so many hard drive troubles, it's not funny. I have at least 1 hard drive crash every 5-6 months. I've switched brands, I've switched computers.. no clue what causes it. Any insight/suggestions?

    3. Re:Good by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      Be nicer to your hardware.

      Get a UPS and ground it and any equipment touching the computer, including outside connections (cable modems)

      Boost humidity in the computer area to 70%-90%.

      Operate with the case on at all times.

      Don't screw drives into the chassis very tightly, just enough to hold them in without vibrating.

      Make sure your case is properly (not 'excessively', just 'properly') cooled. Does an air channel pass over the drive?

      Replace your power supply and cabling, don't use that 'rounded cable' crap (it's more delicate).

      keep the drive/PC running all the time. Use power management features to save juice while leaving the drive on most of the time (mine is set for two hours idle to spin-down).

      Buy drives new, get them from a vendor that recently got OVER a quality issue. I have a feeling that the IBM Deskstar models after the 60 and 75 are mighty-good, I run a few GXP-180s 24/7 just fine. Vendors boost quality a LOT when they have to recover their good name.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    4. Re:Good by TheAmazingBob · · Score: 1

      From G.I. Joe, "Stop all the downloadin'!" It's that pr0n, I tell ya. That high quality streamin' pr0n just tears up disks. My pr0n server chews through a drive per month. Then again, maybe that's because I buy my drives at Goodwill?

    5. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I was going to say some of that but you def. out did me. 1 anecdote, 2 IBM 120GB for 2 years no problems. Seagate is consistently highly rated in the survey at storagereview.com. They gave a recommendation for the Hitachi (once was IBM) 250GB SATA. I just picked up a 200GB Seagate SATA gonna give them a shot. New fluid bearing tech, 5year warranty. Got my fingers crossed. I wasn't really impressed with Seagate's ATA and non-SCSI offerings before.

  18. Faster Hard Drives are nice... by Duke+Machesne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But will they make it to market before memory cards large enough and cheap enough to feasibly replace hard drives altogether do?

    1. Re:Faster Hard Drives are nice... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why are there slashdotters that believe memory chips will replace hard drives on a large scale any time soon?

      2TB is the addressing limit of that standard, not the amount of memory they will have. 2TB memory cards will take a loooong time to be released, esp. given that 8GB CF cards aren't available, 4GB CF cards are still pretty expensive, if available at all.

      Because flash memory cards follow RAM in costs, I doubt flash drives will replace hard drives any time soon unless you want your hard drive to be as small as your RAM space. Very similar processes are used, and I don't think the cost of making 32MB RAM chips are much different than 32MB solid state chips, because they are very similar in complexity.

    2. Re:Faster Hard Drives are nice... by Duke+Machesne · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, right now memory cards are wildly more expensive. But hard drives used to be wildly more expensive than they currently are, too.

      The first round of very fast and very efficient (if also very expensive) flash memory cards large enough to be considered viable hard-drive replacements are coming around now.

      Just as demand for hard-drives has pushed down hard-drive price, and demand for increasing amounts of RAM has pushed down RAM prices, so will increasing demand for solid-state memory hard-drive replacement cards increase.

      I, for one, am optimistic.

    3. Re:Faster Hard Drives are nice... by droleary · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, right now memory cards are wildly more expensive. But hard drives used to be wildly more expensive than they currently are, too.

      Internal market price changes are meaningless; you have to compare between the markets. Is flash memory decreasing in price at a faster rate than HDs? It doesn't look like it to me. And even if it is, the current per Gig price difference is about 100:1, which means flash has a lot of ground to make up.

    4. Re:Faster Hard Drives are nice... by VeryProfessional · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But will they make it to market before memory cards [slashdot.org] large enough and cheap enough to feasibly replace hard drives altogether do?

      Why the assumption that we have one or the other? The history of computing is one of a lengthening memory pyramid. It used to be just RAM and nonvolatile storage. Now we have three levels of cache on top of that. Now (excepting certain bits of bloatware *cough cough*) operating systems are not growing in size at the same rate as storage technology. I still have trouble filling more than a gigabyte or two on a basic Linux install. Why not have a situation where OS and core applications are stored on solid-state memory chips (say 10 G), while all the media that people are so fond of can end up on your mega hard-drive? That way you get the benefit of both: snappy load times for executable code, and near-unlimited, low-cost storage for all your media.

    5. Re:Faster Hard Drives are nice... by Duke+Machesne · · Score: 1

      Very astute! I want!

    6. Re:Faster Hard Drives are nice... by Gerad · · Score: 1

      Yes, but as technology improves for RAM and for memory cards, technology will also *gasp* improve for hard disk technology, providing more benefits and/or decreased cost as well, especially if the HD industry looks at memory cards as a direct competetor.

      --
      Be the Ultimate Ninja! Play Billy Vs. SNAKEMAN today!
    7. Re:Faster Hard Drives are nice... by MrNemesis · · Score: 1

      By far the major problem with flash-based tech is the severely limited write cycles. Current flash drive sectors crap out after about 10,000-100,000 writes; you can get around this with specialised filesystems such as used in embedded components which minimise writes (and spread them out over the drive), but it's patently clear that flash isn't a useful technology for consumer storage; your average windows PC would eat through 100,000 writes to pagefile within a few days.

      Currently the most promising technology is MRAM, which is essentially non-volatile RAM. Once this makes it's way into prosumer storage, we're made, but it's still pretty much a cute concept at the moment.

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    8. Re:Faster Hard Drives are nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find that current flash endurance is about ten times your estimate. The only place I've seen 10k erase cycles is for program store integrated into microcontrollers. General purpose flash is usually 100K - 1M.

      Lots of people (IBM, Infineon, Motorola (Freescale), Cypress, Sharp, Honeywell, Samsung, Toshiba, NEC) sell MRAM chips. The density isn't going to knock flash off quite yet. But I think it's beyond the "cute concept" stage.

    9. Re: Faster Hard Drives are nice... by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 1
      Why are there slashdotters that believe memory chips will replace hard drives on a large scale any time soon?

      Ultimately, market price also results from how hard it is to produce the core technology (harddrives: mechanics, thin-layer magnetic materials, read/write head construction etc., memory chips: IC fabrication technology, advances in semiconductor technology)

      So far, harddrive-based technology clearly had the upper hand in storage/price ratio. But who says that will stay the same in years to come?

      Maybe next-gen harddrive technologies will prove to be very hard/expensive to produce, while increasingly dense/cheap memory chips might be relatively easy to produce. Who knows what will be easy to mass-produce in 5 or 10 years from now?

    10. Re:Faster Hard Drives are nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      let's do a comparison:
      Flash mem: $60/0.5gig = $120/gig
      RAM: $75/0.5gig = $150/gig
      HD: $120/250gig = $0.48/gig

      This is almost 3 ORDERS of magnitude better.

      Hard drives have always been improving and so have alternative storage devices. In fact, when flash started out and people thought it would put hard drives out of the market, hard drives improved their capacity even more during those years and blew them away. _It just couldn't match the growth rate of hard drives_

      Granted, there are pros and cons to each type of storage: power, speed, reliability, and many others. But that's the point of engineering. You pick which one meets your needs at given costs, etc. There's always one pro that one type of storage may have that may make it useful in some application.

    11. Re:Faster Hard Drives are nice... by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

      What about longevity of a Flash Card versus an HD? I read in some forum that for a pen drive, a sector can only be read 1 mill times before being rendered inoperative. That was also a reason, why most people don't suggest running a complete version of linux on a USB pen drive. Was that bs? There are not many resources (I've tried googling) that describe this problem.

      --
      Sig it.
  19. Faster and longer lasting hard drives? by thephotoman · · Score: 2, Funny

    How long do you think it'll be before I start getting "natural Viagra" spam for this technology? And how much longer will it take for the spammers to realize that they're talking about an actual computer component and not anything phallic?

    --
    Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
  20. What's changed? by gerardrj · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Granted, I've not kept up on the intricate details of hard disk manufacture, but I recall that the drive heads were suspended above the physical media by a thin layer of air. Has that changed? What's the point of lubricating the disk surfaces if the heads don't touch them.

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    1. Re:What's changed? by Zocalo · · Score: 0

      I think the lubricant is probably intended to be used on the spindle, which is where the bulk of the friction in a hard drive will be. I doubt that using it on the head actuators as well is going to make seek times noticably faster, although it may be easier for manufacturing to use one lube throughout the drive.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    2. Re:What's changed? by Tlosk · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ignore the other people who replied, I don't think they bothered to read the article. The lubricant on the disc surface is just to help protect it from damage (platters are already have a protective layer, but this new one has better characteristics at high speed and is simpler to apply because it doesn't require seperate adhesives).

      The term lubricant probably wasn't the best choice, rather it's just a protective film.

      Supposedly at the high RPMs of top of the line drives, the film currently used can ripple or even spin off entirely after prolonged usage which leaves the disc more vulnerable to head contact or armature resting.

    3. Re:What's changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they lubrificate the axe.

    4. Re:What's changed? by Angstroman · · Score: 1

      In operation, heads are supported on a very thin aerodynamic bearing film, indeed. There are still two conditions that influence the life and allowable speed of the drive. One is the fact that the heads must land at some time when the drive is off in most (although not all) designs. The other is that the aero film is much smaller than a typical particle. It is quite undesireable to have a bearing in which the slightest degree of contact or small particle immediately results in catastrophic failure. Designers of aerostatic and aerodynamic bearings of all types pay careful attention to the plain bearing properties of the materials that they use for this reason.

    5. Re:What's changed? by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      Actually, in all the drives I've disassembled, the heads are parked off the data section and use a support arm to "lift" the head armatures away from the platters.
      When the drives start up, the spindle comes to speed, then the heads are released once the air layer is sufficient to support the heads.

      Head crashes are indeed a major cause of catastrophic data loss, but I just don't see how a new layer on the disk will prevent that.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    6. Re:What's changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're correct, the heads should never touch the disk when it's operatating ... but sometimes they do. Due to shock or vibration, contaminants, extremely low flying height (much less than 1 microinch nowadays) + bumps in the media, or any number of weird things that happen, you do get head contact.

      Tlosk's response to you is right. In addition to protecting the disk from head contact, it also protects against corrosion and the head from being messed up when it does hit. If there is a hit, the lube will be gone in that area, but since it is a liquid, it will flow back in and protect it again. There are many other things properties that make it important too but these are the main ones.

    7. Re:What's changed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      head crashes would be like totalling your car. Any head/disk contact is like a minor car accident.

      You don't notice them at first, but they add up over the life of the drive. This new material supposedly will help protect the disk better from these small hits, making data more reliable and the drive last longer. On the other hand, if the head hits the disk really hard due to a hard shock, you're screwed. nothing can prevent the drive from failing.

      BTW, heads parked off the disk and on the ramp are called Load/Unload drives, while the other ones described are called CSS (contact start-stop). CSS came first, but due to stiction problems starting up (see article) and various other issues with laser texturing and reduced data area (it takes up valuable space to park it on the disk), IBM started the LUL. It's slowly being used more in 3.5" drives, but in laptop drives and smaller, they are all LUL.

    8. Re:What's changed? by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

      When I first read the title of the story, I figured it was to prevent this kind of hard drive damage from happening.

      That's a drive that spun it's platters free from the spindle and literally ground them away from the inside out.

      It also made a horrible noise and created a lot of heat inside the case. :)

      Apparently this new lube isn't related to this kind of thing.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  21. But it's still mechanical. by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While it's all very nice, the problem is easily ignored if one would just go for solid state HDs. Why is it so damn hard to come up with a simple system? I don't care if it's 5 1/4 device with 20gb at 200 euros. Think of the MASSIVE speed and reliability increases...

    1. Re:But it's still mechanical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We do have solid state drives but they cost thousands for just a few GBs still.

    2. Re:But it's still mechanical. by roadrunnerro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The only MASSIVE increase would be in access time, but dunno about bandwith (SD, CF and friends aren't that fast - maybe with some kind of internal redundant arrangement, a la RAID, if it's not already used) or reliability (they have a limited number of write cycles - the swap file on a machine low on RAM or on a file server would probably burn a hole through it...).

    3. Re:But it's still mechanical. by Glonoinha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually I have been thinking about solid state drives for quite some time now. Here's what I came up with the last iteration :

      You are pretty much just as well off with a nice tight SATA RAID 5 array. Tom's ran a recent article on throughput for SATA RAID 5 arrays and found that at 6 drives (using those bad ass high end Raptors, I'm guessing) he could break through the 200 megabytes per second sustained transfer rates. About 4-5 times what you and I get on a daily basis from our regular ATA-100 hard drive (which was to be expected, given the number of drives in the array.) A single person on a single machine doing single (or simple multi) tasking isn't going to notice much difference in performance between that and a RAM drive. Some, yes, but almost negligible. The only way the additional performance gains from RAM make sense is multiple users doing radically different things - this would have the drive array thrashing around trying to do all those different things but RAM seek times are effectively zero.

      You really wouldn't get the incredible boost in performance you are imagining, simply because hard drives are already pretty fast and approaching the point where they are no longer the bottleneck.

      Look here for a review from a little over a year ago. He got all excited about the differences he saw, but in reality many applications didn't show a noticable difference.

      Don't get me wrong - I am going to keep trying, as this is a never ending quest ... but solid state drives aren't the holy grail of computing.

      If you want to experiment with solid state drives, check out Cenatek's Ramdisk. Cost you $69 (they may have a free timed demo, I'm not entirely sure) and you can use it to convert your system RAM to a Ramdrive = solid state disk. If you like what it does, just throw more memory in your computer and go for it. If you can find a way to really speed up your system, be sure to share it with the rest of us ($69 is dirt cheap if you can figure out a way to get a 20% boost in performance - but you would need a bunch of RAM to take advantage of it.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    4. Re:But it's still mechanical. by buttahead · · Score: 1

      BTW, the "CENATEK Rocket Drive" that you mention is basically a glorified ram disk requiring ram that can only be used for the disk. There is no long term storgage as far as it is concerned... when you power down, the disk is wiped. I can do the same thing in linux without paying the 70$. I believe this is also possible in DOS and ms windows.

      So, the ony reason for this comment was to say that a ram disk isn't the same thing as solid state long term storage that most people expect when mentioning "solid state disks".

    5. Re:But it's still mechanical. by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      The current solid state storage technologies are optimized for cost not use cycles. So while they can take enormous number of reads, they have limited number of writes. This is probably why the palm pilot does not have a replaceable battery. When the battery is dead the life of the ROM is probably over as well.

      If you get a flash drive/pen drive/ whatever, don't presume to use it like a harddrive. You will kill it within the year.

    6. Re:But it's still mechanical. by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      OT, but raid5 is very slow for writes.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    7. Re:But it's still mechanical. by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      The Rocket Drive is similar but different (that thing is a PCI card that lets you put in up to 4G of RAM (PC133 I believe) that is separate from the system memory. I thing that it has an external power supply so it can keep the contents when you power cycle the machine) - but yes the one I was specifically mentioning as a 'test drive' of Solid State Disks is exactly a RAM disk that uses the system's onboard memory, and works exactly like you describe.

      I think the ramdrive originated with DOS (not 100% certain DOS did it first, but it was a strong utility in the DOS suite) - but there isn't a native Windows 2000 or XP ramdrive (hence the market for this package.)

      The one by Cenatek does some other cool things like setting it to 'back itself up' to your hard drive periodically (in the event of a crash you can recover it) and during system shutdown, restoring from that backup during boot time. That's pretty cool, IMHO, and that it uses system memory is also a good thing since system memory is pretty much the cheapest to upgrade and fastest to access.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    8. Re:But it's still mechanical. by karnal · · Score: 2, Informative

      "This is probably why the palm pilot does not have a replaceable battery."

      OK. Now I'm gonna swear. Where the fuck did you pull that from?

      Try running out of battery power on a palm VX (I know, older model - but you said "palm"). You lose all applications in memory.

      Why? 'cause it's not "flash memory". It's actually something closer to SDRAM, which requires refresh charges every so often. Hence, if you run out of battery, you lose the memory. As well, it's not "ROM" if you can write to it.

      --
      Karnal
    9. Re:But it's still mechanical. by Shimmer · · Score: 1

      Surely this is not true of Compact Flash cards, is it? Number of reads and writes are nearly equal when I take digital photos, and I expect my CF card to last as long as my camera.

      --
      The most rabid believers in American Exceptionalism are the exact same people whose policies are destroying it.
  22. What better excuse by antifoidulus · · Score: 1, Funny

    to install Leisure Suit Larry. The leisure suit jokes alone should make your hard drive spin faster than you ever thought possible.

  23. Stop making joke by Hao+Wu · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is not funny. We have very serious technology break-through, and you should not be laugh about "Hard drive", "lube-and-polyester, "etc."

    --
    I suggest you read Slashdot
    1. Re:Stop making joke by Aldric · · Score: 1, Redundant
      You're new here, aren't you?

      Sorry, just couldn't resist...

    2. Re:Stop making joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Stop making joke"
      "We have very serious technology break-through"
      "you should not be laugh about"

      Start making joke! Should we "be laugh about" the fact that "we have very serious" grammar break?

      More seriously, this article was quite funny, and the author's choice of words were begging to be made fun of.

    3. Re:Stop making joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nej, dra åt helvete, you just made my foes list!
      Log in so I can add you. Jerk. You have no sense of humour.

  24. Internal speed is the problem, not interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    S-ATA, P-ATA or one of the multiple SCSI interfaces, all are not maxed out until you put multiple disks (and in S-ATA that is impossible, by design, P-ATA just sucks at that and the only worth naming is SCSI, that was designed with that in mind). The issue is the mechanical speed. For a single disk, all interfaces are faster than the platters and heads can read or write sequentially. Think about heads that can move quicker from one place to another and disks that turn faster, thus allowing to have better peak speed and also better real speed (non continous reads or writes). Of course, that requires better mechanical parts to avoid problems like vibrations or head crashes. Maybe the new lubricant could help with that.

  25. You may laugh by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    Big deal... I am constantly bombarded about emails promising 'longer lasting hard drives' something about pills or herbs, this is nothing new.

    You may laugh, but I don't know when, I don't know how, but I am sure that eventually one day someone will somehow use this new technology for pornography...

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  26. SATA a multi disk bus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last time I checked, SATA was a point to point link. One end the controller, the other end a disk. They solved the PATA problem by removing the the problem. If you want shared bus, you get SCSI, USB, FW...

    1. Re:SATA a multi disk bus? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      If you want shared bus, you get SCSI, USB, FW...

      Either that or you get a PCI/PCIe/PCI-X bus to do the bus sharing for you, although all those interfaces can be used externally, and S-ATA wasn't really inteneded for that. S-ATA was meant to be a point-to-point interface so that it could ramp up the interface a silly lot, to 1.5Gbps.

  27. Bearings by stimpleton · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The oddest materials pop up for load bearing duties.
    "Felt bearings" have been used in the automotive industry for years.

    Especially in rack and pinion steering system where lateral forces are not so high.

    Lubricants for the felt material include oil and graphite powder, or run dry.

    While more durable bearings such as needle roller, bronze sleeve, and teflon bushings, may be the preference of performance applications, ease of fitment, damping ability, and cost, still ensures felt bearings are used today, both in automotive and other industrial machinery. It is very possible, you have owned a car with one or moore felt bearings somewhere in the steering system.

    The properties of synthetic material as a bearing surface have been used and far back as 1950's(and maybe beyond).

    --

    In post Patriot Act America, the library books scan you.
    1. Re:Bearings by DoctorHibbert · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you mean rack and peanut steering. Pinion? What is this, make-up-words day?

      --
      Arbitrary sig
    2. Re:Bearings by KD7JZ · · Score: 1

      I have a subscription at work to some trade journal about the mechanical design industry. They had a very interesting article recently about the new use of wood as a bearing material. There are several companies newly manufacturing wood bearings. Apparently over certain heat/life/bearing ranges some hardwoods can be excellent bearing materials.

    3. Re:Bearings by Dahan · · Score: 1
      I think you mean rack and peanut steering. Pinion? What is this, make-up-words day?

      What's a rack? Rat and peanut steering... You know--rats eat peanuts?

  28. sterically hindered polymer by bodrell · · Score: 4, Informative
    For those who failed chemistry . . .
    The polymer used in this application is a sterically hindered polyester. An ester is a carboxylic acid with some sort of organic group replacing the hydrogen (i.e., O=C-O-CH3 is the methyl ester moiety).

    Bulky groups sterically hinder a molecule, making part of the molecule inaccessible. One very common application is the sterically hindered base, like triethylamine. A normal amine is NH3, but a triethyl amine is N(CH3)3. The effect is that the compound raises a solution's pH, but cannot react with other functional groups easily. This helps prevent side reactions / biproducts.

    t-BOC is one type of a sterically hindered protective group. Generally, protecting groups are removed as one of the final steps in order to get the desired product. This polyester has steric hindrance that protects the ester bond. But the article didn't say how that was accomplished. Adamantanes are another type of bulky group used to sterically hinder a molecule.

    --
    Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
    1. Re:sterically hindered polymer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what the fuck are you talking about? speak english!

    2. Re:sterically hindered polymer by haruchai · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, I bet there are a lot of people who've never failed chemistry who didn't know what a sterically hindered polyester is.
      I'm also sure that there are a ton of smart chemistry students who, thanks to your pedantic "explanation" are no wiser.

      I hope that you don't plan to teach chemistry to anyone who doesn't already know it.
      Not everyone has studied organic chemistry.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    3. Re:sterically hindered polymer by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Uh, that sort of chemistry falls under organic chemistry. Organic chemistry was the third class to take in the chemistry track at the schools I went to, but non chem-majors only needed to take the first two.

    4. Re:sterically hindered polymer by bodrell · · Score: 4, Informative
      Well, I bet there are a lot of people who've never failed chemistry who didn't know what a sterically hindered polyester is. I'm also sure that there are a ton of smart chemistry students who, thanks to your pedantic "explanation" are no wiser.

      I hope that you don't plan to teach chemistry to anyone who doesn't already know it. Not everyone has studied organic chemistry.

      (I didn't write the above comment; just trying to keep the thread from getting too deep)
      Sorry, but anyone who studied (and passed) chemistry ought to know what steric hindrance is. If you're having trouble with my vocabulary, then I'll try to clarify.


      Steric: having to do with space. As in, "I was unable to fit my couch in the Honda Civic due to steric hindrance."
      Polymer: A molecule composed of three or more repeating units. This can be a heteropolymer (more than one type of repeating unit) or a homopolymer (only one type of repeating unit). The repeating unit is called a monomer, and often has an antiquated name. For example, ethylene is the antiquated name of ethene, a two-carbon hydrocarbon with a double bond between carbons. However, polyethylene has no double bonds (because the bonds opened during the polymerization).
      Moiety: A part of a molecule that has a particular functionality. For example, the amino acids each have three moieties: the amino part, the acid part, and the side-group. For proline the amino part is the side group also. Functional groups (amines, esters, acids, alcohols, etc.) are all moieties.

      Are we clear now? Or is that still too pedantic? BTW, I'm not a teacher and don't plan on being one in the near future. There are different levels of understanding of any subject. Just because some people don't know what a molecule is doesn't mean I should define every term when I mention them. To quote H. L. Mencken, "Those who can, do; those who can't, teach."

      --
      Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
    5. Re:sterically hindered polymer by addaon · · Score: 1

      N(CH3)3 is trimethyl amine, not triethyl.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    6. Re:sterically hindered polymer by georgewilliamherbert · · Score: 1
      Sorry, but anyone who studied (and passed) chemistry ought to know what steric hindrance is.
      I was not a chemistry major in college, but I took a few of the science track chem courses at a top level US university. And did a hell of a lot better than just passing them. I have a fairly deep background in Chemistry beyond college, my mother, aunt, and grandfather were all professionals (Granddad was a chemistry professor). I am technically active in several science and engineering fields not including Chemistry.

      As far as I can tell, looking back through all my textbooks (which I kept), Steric never came up as a term.

      Now that it's been defined it all makes sense; the issues you are describing are all fairly easy to understand. I am sure that I could have google'd the term as well.

      But I didn't know it on first reading.

      There is a very important difference between someone who is just unfamiliar with particular field specific terminology, and someone who is not aware of basic concepts in a specific field.

      You are blurring the line, or do not understand it.

      There has been a great failure of science education in the last decade or so (well, ok, going back further than that). Jargon, and a haughty attitude that encourage it, are proliferating. This is a terrible thing from a communications / education point of view.

    7. Re:sterically hindered polymer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the guy was being a prick and a show-off, myself.

      Even so, "steric" was a word throw about with some frequency in my first organic chemistry class, particularly in the context of explaining why some molecules have a particular shape. I didn't exactly go to a top university, and the professor was a Chinese guy who could barely pronounce English. I can still remember him struggling with the word "bulky."

      How old are your chemistry books?

    8. Re:sterically hindered polymer by bodrell · · Score: 1
      N(CH3)3 is trimethyl amine, not triethyl.

      Of course you're right. My mistake.

      --
      Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
    9. Re:sterically hindered polymer by bodrell · · Score: 1
      I thought the guy was being a prick and a show-off, myself.

      Sorry you feel that way. I actually really enjoy chemistry, but feel it's been given short shrift. In my major, there were two special classes for both physics and bio, both geared towards liberal-artsy-people, but no chemistry. Why the hell not?

      The folks here on slashdot are certainly a varied crowd, but I've seen a whole lot more physics experts than chemistry experts. Electrical engineers have to take physics, but not chemisty. But you know what? Those fancy CPUs in your computer were made possible by photolithography, and organic chemistry is what allows the technology to get smaller and smaller. Photoresists have been the bottleneck for the past several generations of processors, although that may be about to change with non-optical processor manufacturing.

      I personally appreciate it when a knowledgable person makes some clarifying comment in a forum. I know crap about SQL, Java, kernals, etc. But I do want to know more, and I don't think someone is a show-off prick just for sharing their knowledge. Would it have bothered you so much if I'd posted as AC?

      --
      Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
    10. Re:sterically hindered polymer by JonLatane · · Score: 0
      Umm... If I'm not mistaken, an ester is actually the product of a condensation reaction between an alchohol and a carboxylic acid. Thus, it would have the general structure R1-C-O-CO-R2 where R1 is the stuff in the alchohol and R2 is the stuff in the acid.

      To get a polyester, the alchohol/acid condensation reaction is repeated over and over using a di-alchohol and a di-carboxylic acid. Essentially, you end up with a monomer that has one hydroxyl end and one carboxyl end and can repeat indefinitely. This gives a polyester the general formula HO-(-C-R1-C-O-CO-R2-COO-)n-H where n is the number of times the monomer is repeated(same R1/R2 as above).

      Probably the most important polyester is polyethylene terephthalate (PET), which is used in all kinds of stuff, most notably those 20oz soda bottles.

    11. Re:sterically hindered polymer by bodrell · · Score: 1
      There is a very important difference between someone who is just unfamiliar with particular field specific terminology, and someone who is not aware of basic concepts in a specific field.

      You are blurring the line, or do not understand it.

      There has been a great failure of science education in the last decade or so (well, ok, going back further than that). Jargon, and a haughty attitude that encourage it, are proliferating. This is a terrible thing from a communications / education point of view.

      All I can say to that is, "guilty as charged". I guess I wasn't speaking to people who have no background in chemistry at all. When you eat sleep and breathe a discipline, it does indeed become hard to discern how much others know about it. Where do I start? Do I have to explain moles/molarity? What about molecules and atoms? Some of these words are not actually jargon, but vocabulary. Where do I draw the line? I think it's always a bit blurry.

      The real problem here is people's unwillingness to learn foreign subject matter. If I bandied about a bunch of computer jargon, no one would make negative comments. But mention something about chemistry, and the first reply tells me to "speak fscking english." You think I knew what a pipeline was before reading slashdot? In the context of a CPU rather than petroleum? In college this was even worse. I took classes in both chemical engineering and liberal arts; the engineering people always said "why would I need to read a book?" while the liberal arts people said "why would I need to learn math?" When I see a computer vocab word I don't know, I often look it up to see what I'm missing. Why are the standards so different for chemistry?

      --
      Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
    12. Re:sterically hindered polymer by bodrell · · Score: 1
      Umm... If I'm not mistaken, an ester is actually the product of a condensation reaction between an alchohol and a carboxylic acid. Thus, it would have the general structure R1-C-O-CO-R2 where R1 is the stuff in the alchohol and R2 is the stuff in the acid.

      Pardon my shorthand. It's hard to show where bonds are using plain old text, so I just showed the ester moiety itself without any Rs. But you have too many carbons. The general form of an ester is R1-CO-O-R2, not R1-C-O-CO-R2. A carboxylic acid is R1-COOH, and the ester substitutes an R2 for a hydrogen. It's a notation issue. For the condensation of pentanol and acetic acid, you get CH3(CH2)4OCOCH3 (pentyl acetate, which smells like bananas). If your R contains all five carbons, it's just R1-OCOCH3, but it could also be written in your notation (R1-C-O-CO-R2) if you define R1 as a four carbon chain. And yes, I reversed your R1 and R2. Because -OH is a poor leaving group, esterifications are generally carried out using an acid chloride instead of the acid. That means they aren't true condensation reactions.

      You're right about PET, though. The fact that PET is made by condensation rather than a chain polymerization is what makes it so impressive. Novel catalysts are what allowed PET to be used so widely (before their invention the reaction yields were too low).

      --
      Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
    13. Re:sterically hindered polymer by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      When I see a computer vocab word I don't know, I often look it up to see what I'm missing. Why are the standards so different for chemistry?
      They're not, but you're on Slashdot, a site run by computer geeks for computer geeks. Chemistry geeks are not the audience here. Sure there is some crossover, but you should have expected that the majority of the audience would know only very basic chemistry.
    14. Re:sterically hindered polymer by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Well I am a biology major and I am taking my second chemistry course now.

      I never heard of these terms either.

      Perhaps "for those who flunked chemistry" should have meant "for those who have not taken organic chemistry..". But we got the message and yes the explanation of the terms were helpfull since I now understand your first post.

      Imagine telling our mothers some of the posts here about the advantages of risc vs cisc and assembly langauge routines across different cpu's? Its a no brainer to us who program but it surely would confuse someone not educated in that area.

      Its not different for standards in chemistry vs computers but slashdot is a computer nerd oriented site... or was back in the old days.

      Thanks for the clarifications in the other posts. I dont want to be ignorant and like to learn.

    15. Re:sterically hindered polymer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are unable to communicate with 'normal' people then perhaps you should learn how.

    16. Re:sterically hindered polymer by 808140 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While the GP's post may have had a bit of a "look how much I know" feel to it, I suspect that your reaction to his use of "jargon" which with you are not familiar is an emotional rather than rational one. We always feel stupid when people speak to us about subjects we know little about (relative to them) as if "everyone understands it". Anyone who has ever been exposed to experts in a field other than their own has experienced this.

      But as a mathematician, I understand that to properly express a problem, one must develop a language to describe it. To put this in CS terms, someone once said that if you lay out your data structures correctly, algorithms just fall into place, and that your code practically writes itself. The catch is, designing good data structures is no small feat, and much thought goes into it, and understanding the motivation is not always easy if you aren't really familiar with the problem.

      In Math, we often joke (in a haha only serious kind of way) that our discipline is more linguistic than anything else. In a sense, math is simply "jargon", which as far as I can tell is the term used by laypeople threatened by big words for terminology with which they aren't familiar. There's really not much more to it than that; arrange your definitions properly, word them carefully, and the proofs just come.

      Chemistry, physics, biology, and even sciences such as sociology and psychology all do the same sorts of things. I took o-chem in school and we used the term steric hinderance a lot, but the term "moiety" I either never learned or didn't remember. So I looked it up.

      If the GP had been piling layer upon layer of complexity into his post, forcing the reader to master advanced organic chemistry concepts before being able to understand what he meant, I think he could rightly be accused of jargonism. But here, he used three or four terms with which you might be unfamiliar, all of which are trivial to look up.

      I would have expected that a culture (slashdot) so connected to RTFM and CS, which probably has more technical jargon than any other scientific discipline, would know how to look up a few terms outside of their field.

      Instead, you just bitch. Learning is a two way street, you know. You actually have to make an effort sometimes. Now you know what steric hinderance is. You've learned something, and if he hadn't used the term, you wouldn't know. This is not bad. You should thank him.

    17. Re:sterically hindered polymer by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Well, the thing is, those definitions would have been a lot more useful than the original post. When I do explanatory posts related to electrical engineering (side-note: EEs at my school *were* required to take chemistry and o-chem both) I try not to use specific jargon and to define jargon I need to use.

      Your original post, plus definitions, is useful to most reasonably intelligent people. Minus the definitions, totally useless to anyone who hasn't studied more chemistry than 99% of the population, including a fair portion of people who have, in fact, taken (and aced, in my case - steric wasn't a word I recall being used at all though) a reasonable introduction to the field of chemistry.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    18. Re:sterically hindered polymer by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but anyone who studied (and passed) chemistry ought to know what steric hindrance is.

      I use chemistry at my job every day (I'm an environmental scientist who mainly works on air permitting) and I don't know what steric hinderance is. For the record, I was a CS major and never took chemistry in college, though I did receive college credit for AP chemistry. I have studied (and passed) chemistry, just not at the level where topics such as steric hindrance are covered. Chemistry is quite a big field, as I'm sure you know.

      To quote H. L. Mencken, "Those who can, do; those who can't, teach."

      Quoting people doesn't make them, or you, right. I've always thought that Mencken quote to be elitist. It presents a truly disgusting attitude about teachers; implying that they are all people who couldn't cut it in their field. Einstein was a teacher. Do you think he couldn't "do"? Without teachers, none of us would be anywhere near where we are today, including you.

    19. Re:sterically hindered polymer by Politburo · · Score: 1

      While the GP's post may have had a bit of a "look how much I know" feel to it, I suspect that your reaction to his use of "jargon" which with you are not familiar is an emotional rather than rational one.

      Look at the original post. He starts by saying "For those who failed chemistry..." Well, there are a lot of us who didn't fail chemistry, and didn't know what he was talking about, so there was a clear disparity there, and we pointed it out. His attitude was truly arrogant and elitist, and that was the source of the negative reaction. I think most of us learn things here every day, and that's why we come back despite duplicate posts, lame jokes, trolls, etc.

    20. Re:sterically hindered polymer by 808140 · · Score: 1

      That's a good point. If he had truly been directing his post at people who failed chemistry, he would have presented a much less technical explanation.

      Perhaps I should have taken a different stance.

      At any rate, I agree with your assessment of the situation. I guess I was the one responding emotionally to an accusation of deliberate jargon usage. People who ask us questions about math and then fail to understand our answers often resort to such name-calling. But in this case it doesn't look like it was name calling. So for that I appologize.

      Still, I'll stand by my original point regarding learning new things. But by the spirit of your post it doesn't seem like you disagree with me, just with the OP's intent. So I think we're on the same page.

      Cheers!

    21. Re:sterically hindered polymer by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Einstein was a teacher. Do you think he couldn't "do"?

      He's right up there with dopes like Sagan, Hawking, and Feynman!

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    22. Re:sterically hindered polymer by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Wow, I just wanted to know if Leisure Suit Larry would play better on it.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  29. "New Lubricant Leads To Faster Hard Drives"? by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Fucking hell...the Slashdot editors have no respect for those with dirty minds. NONE!

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  30. Buy our "Boogie Grease!" by JoeCommodore · · Score: 3, Funny
    Yeah, baby! That's what I said, Boogie Grease!

    Boogie-Grease - made with bitchin' bad-ass polyester technology. Our Boogie-Grease will make your hard drive run longer and faster.

    So don't come up "short and slow" in the server department and be the laughing stock of the tech lab. Buy Boogie-Grease Today!

    P.S. Nerd chicks dig it!

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  31. Its funny. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That I am reading this right after I reinstalled a new harrdrive on my Notebook where after 2 1/2 years the IBM Travelstar died on me. So in in an other 2 1/2 years these drives will be available for my next replacement. Still I wish I had the option to at least raid 1 my laptop. Even it it does add weight and uses more battery.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Its funny. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Still I wish I had the option to at least raid 1 my laptop.

      Just get a firewire hard drive, and back-up your laptop every night. When your drive goes, put in the new drive, and restore it from the firewire drive.

      RAID isn't going to prevent you from having to go through the trouble of removing your defective drive, and installing the new one, so I don't see the advantage.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:Its funny. by jayteedee · · Score: 1

      Pseudo RAID-1 system. Buy an external USB-2 or Firewire laptop HD and case which can run off the USB or Firewire power (respectively). Get a file syncronizing program like SyncBack from http://www.2brightsparks.com/downloads.html which is a FREE windows syncro tool, or use rsync on unix systems and you can back up your laptop drive nightly, or schedule SyncBack to run every hour, 10 minutes, whatever (1 minute granularity). I live on a laptop myself and used to have the big 3.5" drives that I could back up when I got home, but that was way too much trouble and extra work so I would tend to not do the backup daily because of laziness. I now carry the extra laptop drive with me in my laptop case because it is so small and lightweight. I don't even notice that much of a reduction in laptop life when using the external drive. I maybe lose 10-15 minutes of battery life (guess only - no real measurements).

      --
      Religion and science are both 90% crap..but that doesn't negate the other 10%.
  32. Faster, but maybe smellier? by postgrep · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Won't the heat of the hardrive heat the lube up? And if so, won't it smell bad?

    1. Re:Faster, but maybe smellier? by Fjornir · · Score: 2, Funny
      So tell me - when was the last time you were huffing hard-drive emissions?

      On second thought, please don't tell me.

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    2. Re:Faster, but maybe smellier? by postgrep · · Score: 1

      Nah, My harddrive has a fan :)

    3. Re:Faster, but maybe smellier? by postgrep · · Score: 1

      My hard drive has fans :P

  33. so does my ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    inflatable

  34. Other Applications by karmatic · · Score: 0, Troll

    As with almost any new technology, the real benefit may come not in the originally intended manner, but through through other uses people find for the technology.

    WD-40 was an accident, and the inventor was not trying to make a lubricant. Now we've got a lubricant, let's see what else we can do with it.

    Complete an offer, get a free Orkut invite, Gmail invite, and a copy of The Core Media Player Pro, to boot!

    1. Re:Other Applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      WD-40's not a lubricant. It's a penetrant and water repellent.

    2. Re:Other Applications by fostware · · Score: 1

      WD-40 is not a lubricant. It is designed to get moving parts unstuck for later lubrication.

      Ever wonder why a fan will lock up even tighter after applying WD-40 and not lubricating it?

      Sheesh people, RTFLabel...

      --
      "We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run over." - Aneurin Bevan
  35. Re:Ram Drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and cheap, not in this decade i expect though...

  36. Insightful! by tunabomber · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, every girlfriend loves a speedy hard drive! After all, it allows her to perform everyday computing tasks, such as finding the MS Word document she's looking for or installing a new version of Quicken.

    This new lubricant will allow the the hard disk to go faster because it will form an interface between the moving parts and the part of the head that touches them. The smooth, slippery, evenly-coated moving parts will slide much more easily against the head, prolonging its life.
    Really, this is one magnificent technological achievement.

    And to think, all the comments I've read so far have been pornographic innuendos made by "+1, Funny"-hording neanderthals. But your post, on the other hand....

    I just re-read it. nevermind....

    --

    pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
    1. Re:Insightful! by TyrranzzX · · Score: 1

      Your girlfriend installs quicken and stores ms word documents on your dink?

      I don't suppose a user interface joke would be appropriate, or rather, headache inducing?

    2. Re:Insightful! by MarkCollette · · Score: 1

      Science is the religion of believing whatever is most believable.

      I hope you don't actually believe that.

  37. Polyester, eh? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hmm. I've been using polyester based oils in my engines for a long time. So am I going to have to change my HDD oil every 3000 gigabytes or something?

    1. Re:Polyester, eh? by DarkHelmet · · Score: 2, Funny
      You're measuring in gigabytes, and not rotations or miles?

      What's next? You're gonna start telling me that your hard drive can do the Kessel run in less than 12 parsecs?

      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    2. Re:Polyester, eh? by flynns · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, Han Solo boasted about doing the Kessel run in less than 12 parsecs because that particular area is rampant with black holes. The longer the route, the longer the travel time and the greater chance of getting caught. Thus, the length of the route that was taken through the Kessel [what was it, a cluster? system?] was a reflection of skill.

      ...I'm never getting laid.

      --
      'If you're flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a fire exit.'
    3. Re:Polyester, eh? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1


      Gigabytes transferred.

  38. WATCH AS I VIOLATE YOUR MOM WITHOUT LUBRICANT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative
    1. Re:WATCH AS I VIOLATE YOUR MOM WITHOUT LUBRICANT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proof that sometimes moderation make something funnier... LOL

  39. Re:Should have tried... by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

    Please tell me you didn't put "KY JellY" and "Darl McBride" in the same paragraph.

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
  40. the 70's by mottie · · Score: 3, Funny

    A recent discovery in polyester (yes, polyester, you disco baby) lubricants
    THAT explains why people got so busy back in the 70s.

  41. Re:Should have tried... by Fjornir · · Score: 1
    He did. And then you did too. And then I read it.

    We're all sick fucks.

    --
    I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
  42. vehicle oil? by chimpo13 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Could this be used on engines? I know that oil carries away heat, as well as lubricates, in internal combustion engines.

    If they find a way of coating parts and use some kind of anti-freeze in vehicles, maybe internal combustion engines will last longer. Two strokes could make a come back.

    1. Re:vehicle oil? by Spirilis · · Score: 1

      As one poster mentioned, they already do: http://www.drivetrain.com/redlineoilgasdieseladd.h tml

      Polyester-based oils are the base for some synthetic motor oils.

      --
      the real at&t mix
    2. Re:vehicle oil? by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know about synthetic oils like that. This oil acts like a solid when cast as a thin film the article says. It'd be nice if there was a stable coating that could be used on parts in internal combustion engines. Synthetic oils are just better performing oils, and it'd be nice to get away from that. Not sure if that sentence makes much sense.

      It'll be sad when gasoline engines aren't affordable, but if they develop a method of coating parts it'd postpone that from happening. A few more years of driving old cars and riding old motorcycles instead of watching as they disappear.

      Oils are more than anti-friction and if they can figure out a way of using a solid oil film like the one in the article with some sort of cooling aspect, maybe I'll save up enough money to buy a Vincent while gas is still affordable

    3. Re:vehicle oil? by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1

      Two strokes could make a come back.

      Probably not, as so much unburnt fuel and oil goes straight through a two-stroke engine out the exhaust and into the atmosphere. Two-strokes win in simplicity but are just plain dirty to run. Anyone who operates a model airplane engine and sees all the oil coating the airplane after a flight knows what I mean.

      I am purposefully buying four-stroke engines for things like lawn mowers and weed eaters, not only because they are cleaner, but they are quieter, too.

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
  43. Vapor pressure of HD lubricants -- lifespan? by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've often wondered about the rate of evaporation on fluid-bearing HDs. Running at high temperatures, even the lowest level of evaporation will mean a loss of lubricant over the years. Even inside the semi-sealed chamber of the drive, each on-off cycle will mean that the drive exhales the evaporated lubricant and the cooling pattern of a turned-off drive will mean condensation of lubricant on the inside shell of the case.

    Ball-bearings (well-designed ones at least) can last virtually forever. I wonder if the same can be said for fluid bearings?

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Vapor pressure of HD lubricants -- lifespan? by ameoba · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fortunately, this is computer hardware we're talking about - most of it becomes obsolete or suffers a catastrophic failure before it simply wears out.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    2. Re:Vapor pressure of HD lubricants -- lifespan? by seibed · · Score: 1

      remember that the fluid bearing motor itself is sealed within the drive, hopefully this seal is robust enough that the fluid bearing is contained within the motor... all the same, it is relatively common (as in: its still unlikely for it to ever happen to you) for the sealed fluid bearing to leak and contaminate a drive. now the lubricant on the disc itself can be a problem more similar to what you describe, but I am not in a position to know if its actual evaporation or cast offs from any kind of head/disc interference, I suppose both are possible and can lead to certain issues (think of a head landing in a puddle of lubricant)

    3. Re:Vapor pressure of HD lubricants -- lifespan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Errr... wrong lube :]

      The lube in the article refers to the lube on the disk, not the motor that turns the disk.

      The lube does evaporate but at a slow enough rate that it can last for many years. Many extreme tests are run to check that they do last.

      To answer your question about the hard-drive motors: Fluid bearing (FB) motors are superior to ball bearing (BB) motors in almost all respects.

      They last longer, can handle more start/stop cycles, more expensive (which mean they're better :) ), much quieter, handle certain shocks better (ball bearing is metal -->elastic, fluid is incompressible). FB and BB both last a long-ass time, so I'm sure your drive will fail for other reasons before the motor fails.

    4. Re:Vapor pressure of HD lubricants -- lifespan? by LDorman · · Score: 2, Funny

      "...suffers a catastrophic failure before it simply wears out."

      Whew... lucky me, I was able to experience a catstrophic failure before my hard drive wore out. Guess I won't have to replace it after all.

      Nothing personal, just couldn't resist...

      --
      Bush makes our troops prey...
  44. Re: Yes, and how about noise? by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 1
    Faster hard drives, as in spinning/heads moving faster? Does that mean more noise as a side-product?

    It irritates me that every single technology advance appears to be used first to increase the "faster, bigger", and make ergonomics acceptible later.

    Why not use such advances to make current hard drives more silent & cool running, and then ramp up the speed?

  45. Operating Temps by EmperorKagato · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It makes me wonder what are the possible operating temperatures of this lubricant and how much of a viscosity difference we would see from the standards of today compared to this new lubricant that is added.

    --
    ----- You know you have ego issues when you register a domain in your name.
  46. Packaging by MrScary · · Score: 1

    I want the one that comes in the lime green package with the gold chain for the cable.

    --
    I've been searchin for the chord I can't hear Ive been searchin for years Its somewhere inside But its well disguised
  47. hmmm? by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

    try enzyte

    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  48. Great, but...Magnadoodle memory. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MRAM drives.

  49. With the Y2KY fix... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    you can now get four digits into your date instead two.

    1. Re:With the Y2KY fix... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      best joke in the whole silly thread! You need a +6 rimshot!

      whoops...on it goes.....

  50. Longer lasting? by myov · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With my hard drive luck, a year seems like a "longer lasting" drive. I've lost more hard drives in the last year than ever - Just being away on vacation (with the computers unplugged), I lost 2 hard drives! (not a complete loss, but the systems acted funny enough that I suspected total failure if I didn't replace the drives quickly)

    One week of being off, for a drive that is not used 24x7, should not kill a drive. I've had drives sitting on a shelf for a year that still work fine. I should not need to setup a 3-drive RAID array simply to get the level of reliability we had a few years ago.

    --
    I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
  51. Improvements through the mundane by michael_cain · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It is surprising how often improvements in our computer technology comes from relatively mundane sources. For example, much of the reason that Moore's Law has continued to hold is the way that the mechanical engineers have been able to constantly improve our ability to position things accurately. Masks and wafers must be positioned with astonishing (at least to me) accuracy relative to each other in order to allow creation of 90 nm features.

    1. Re:Improvements through the mundane by lawpoop · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "...our ability to position things accurately."

      You've hit upon a deep philosophical point. All that information is, is the location of things. Computation is moving things around.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    2. Re:Improvements through the mundane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Odd, then, that most forms of information storage sort different bits in the exact same locations.

      Perhaps it's merely a philosophical point, rather than a real one.

    3. Re:Improvements through the mundane by hitchhacker · · Score: 1


      Computation is moving things around.

      following taken from Wikipedia:

      Though often mistaken for a planet, Earth is in reality the greatest supercomputer of all time, designed by Deep Thought to discover the Great Question of Life, The Universe And Everything (to which the answer is 42).


      -metric

  52. Where's... by Trikenstein · · Score: 1

    Billy "Wicked" Wilson when you really need him?

  53. Re:Should have tried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, Big Blue is about ready to give Darl his due....

    And Big Blue is, um, BIG. Silly Darl, I hope your SCO health insurance covers rectal reconstuction.

  54. glass coated platters on IBM drives? by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    The lubricant on the disc surface is just to help protect it from damage (platters are already have a protective layer, but this new one has better characteristics at high speed and is simpler to apply because it doesn't require seperate adhesives).

    Didn't IBM, now Hitachi, use some sort of glass coating on their laptop drives? Combined with that and the drop sensor (accelerometer which causes the drive to park the heads when it senses it's falling) they're supposed to be very tough little buggers (they're nothing like the deskstars, which were crap as we all know).

    1. Re:glass coated platters on IBM drives? by gerardrj · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is the actual platters that are made from a ceramic glass instead of metal. The glass has better thermal tolerance and is lighter and stronger than the previous metals used.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  55. Lubricant for better performance and endurance. by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

    Hmm...

    I get lots of blog spam like this.

    I'll just stick to K-Y.

    1. Re:Lubricant for better performance and endurance. by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      Astroglide is a much better product.

  56. The sex and drugs 70's are coming back? by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Polyester, lubricants, disco, faster and longer hard driving...?

  57. Re: Wow ... by John+Jorsett · · Score: 5, Funny
    I swear most slashdot readers must either be 15, or never have sex.

    We have a winner ...

  58. I for one... by LazyPhoenix · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new lubricated polyester overlords.

  59. Well I guess they need to.... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    ...considering how big hard drives are getting....

    They really do need to be faster and last longer..

  60. I did RTFLabel! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Sheesh people, RTFLabel... From the label:
    LUBRICATES Moving parts such as: Hinges Wheels Rollers Chains Gears

    This is from a 10oz can label, located right under the Directions section. I know what you're saying about WD-40, but the lable advertises that it lubricates, thus why people consider it a lubricant.

  61. I am too by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But let's be realistic about time scales here. CF is not replacing harddrives next month or even next year. We are talking probably 5+ years until it is realisticly at the price level and capacity where it's a serious contender for most systems. In the interm, it would be nice to have better harddrives. It's a proven, widely used technology. Making it better is nothing but good.

    Just because there is potentially something better some years off doesn't mean you want to stop working on what you've got now. Quantum computers stand to make current computers looks like abacuses. However, they won't be around for many years, if at all, so it's not like we want to pack up and stop working on current chip technology.

    I too envision a future where one doesn't have RAM and disk, you have one permenant memory storage that holds everything, because it's more than fast enough. However I realise that such a ting is many years off. Even the next logical step, replacing mechanical drives with solid state ones, isn't happening for a few years at least.

    1. Re:I am too by flink · · Score: 1

      Also don't forget that flash memory burns out after a certain number of writes. It's fine for digital cameras, dictation devices, and tranfering the ocassional file, but would you want /var on a flash device?

  62. The report goes on to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately, the only games that can be stored on the hard drive are Leisure Suit Larry and its sequels.

  63. Get your H/\rd d|sk lubr|c4nt for ch3ep ch3ep!! by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 3, Funny

    your womans will love your fore it! H/\rd d|sk lubr|c4nt only 4.95 come on man you ow it to her! Spin faster last longer! many satisfied people can be happy!

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  64. Where the fsck did you learn economics? by The+Monster · · Score: 1
    Just as demand for hard-drives has pushed down hard-drive price, and demand for increasing amounts of RAM has pushed down RAM prices,
    This has got to be one of the dumbest things I've seen on /. in a while. That's not how things work - the Law of Demand says exactly the opposite. An increase in demand (with no change in supply) causes an increase in the market price, not a decrease.

    What in play here is the Law of Supply: the increase in supply without any corresponding increase in demand. The manufacturers of these devices have found ways to make them for less, which has the effect of increasing the quantity of them each is willing to produce at any given price point (that's what an increase in supply means). It is only an increase in supply that can allow for the quantity produced to increase and the price at which that quantity is produced to decrease.

    --

    [100% ISO 646 Compliant]
    SVM, ERGO MONSTRO.

    1. Re:Where the fsck did you learn economics? by The+Conductor · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The law of Supply & Demand work in the short term. Over longer terms, the means of economic production can grow, shift around, or, in the case of fossil fuels for example, shrink. The history of electonics in the last few decades has been one of growing markets suppporting ever larger capital investment, and accumulating technical know-how, bringing us declining per-byte costs for memory and storage.

      In the absence of growing markets (if tarrif wars were to isolate national economies from foreign trade for example) nobody could afford to build those billion dollar fabs, but we would still have advancing technology. So the OP got it half-right.

      And of course the yet-undiscovered low-cost future technology has to exist. Fields outside electronics have had growing markets drive technological and capital investment, but they haven't advanced as fast.

    2. Re:Where the fsck did you learn economics? by tchuladdiass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But the laws of supply and demand only kick in when the supply is constrained. In the case of a non-constrained supply, then what happens is the manufacturer will set the price so that the (sell price - manufacturing cost) * units sold equals is maximized (maximum total profit). Then the manufacture will make as many as will sell at that price.

      Now, in this case, there is another economic force at play. It is the laws of economy of scale. So, as demand increases, more will be manufactured, allowing cheaper production costs, which will allow the sell price to drop, assuming that a lower sell price will increase the "quantity demanded" at that demand level enought to cause enough more units to sell to create a higher profit.

  65. Crossword. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 5, Funny

    One time, I was doing a crossword.

    DI_K

    12. Can be floppy or hard.

    Couldn't make this sort of thing up if I tried.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Crossword. by acidtripp101 · · Score: 0

      Ok, I'm blatently off topic with this one, but since you shared your 'dirty crossword' story, I have to share mine. Same situation, only with an improper solution, so the clue was "______ gussler" and the blanks were C__ (3 letters if you can't tell)... Obviously, the solution was GAS, but my friends (yes... we collectivly do crosswords while hanging out) and I all gave each other a queer look.

      --
      Not Free(as in beer). Free(as in "I'm free to beat you over the head for being a dumbass")
    2. Re:Crossword. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so the clue was "______ gussler" and the blanks were C__

      If that's how you spell "guzzler", I'm not surprised you ended up with a C instead of a G in the first position.

    3. Re:Crossword. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes... we collectivly do crosswords while hanging out

      Wow, you sound like a fun bunch.

  66. Getcher fix, getcher fix... by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 3, Funny

    Poor man. Here, have some amateur lesbian porn. (No joke. Stuff's impossible to find, but there it is.)

    Clearly not work-safe, of course.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Getcher fix, getcher fix... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Thanks for the link, her journal is awesome.

  67. Advantage to Cybersex by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    Anti-virus software.

  68. ...elementary my dear Watson! by fontkick · · Score: 1

    Now I remember why I failed Chemistry.

  69. I was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was grown in a test tube, you insensitive clod!

  70. Re:mod this spammer down! by karmatic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Huh?!?!

    I have placed a total of _one_ "free ipod" messages in _one_ of my post.

    How the heck is this mass spamming? Check the stupid referral IDs. Find _one_ other post of that has the same id.

  71. The challanger... by MachDelta · · Score: 4, Funny
    Heh, a while ago I read a guide on HardOCP about how to install a blowhole in the top of your computer case. It had one sentence that went like so:
    "I know I am anal enough that if my blowhole were cocked to one side, it would drive me nuts. (Show me another non-sexual sentence that uses "anal, cocked, blowhole, and nuts" and you will have my props.)
    This story title doesn't use those exact words, but surely getting four sexual innuendos in any sort of casual sentence is a worthy accomplishment. :)
    1. Re:The challanger... by DarkMinds69 · · Score: 1

      "Nuts" thought the anal whaler as he cocked the harpoon gun, "I'll hit the blowhole".

    2. Re:The challanger... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll present two sentences, for contrast:

      He was so anal-retentive that he cocked the can of nuts to one side in order to avoid the dust from the blowhole. Afterwards, he shoved his cock into MachDelta's mom's blowhole and then did her anally.

  72. Good, but too late. Solid state is the future. by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Informative

    Check out these solid state HD's.

    I'm sure there'll come the time when spinning disks (either floppy or HD) will come to an end and become just pieces of junk in a museum - like vacuum tubes in electronics.

  73. Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Now that is one excellent LiveJournal. A big step up from "My kitties scratched up the chair today."

    (And the sex looks like tons of fun - GB and BB couples could do that too, by the way, vibrators aren't just for the chicks.)

  74. I guess I'm a moron or something. by psetzer · · Score: 1

    I don't see why hard drives aren't magnetically floated above their bearings. Put an induction motor in that baby and reduce your friction problems to a whole lot less. Heck, you can even get it fast enough that the platter will rip itself apart, and have very little friction. 100,000 RPM HDDs anybody? Or am I forgetting something fairly profound. Please, enlighten me.

    --
    "Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is living in a state of sin." -- John von Neumann
    1. Re:I guess I'm a moron or something. by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      It has to be physically connected somewhere, otherwise the platter will bounce around.

      And don't forget the heat - IIRC air resistance is why consumer drives are slower, because the average computer user doesn't have a well cooled case.

  75. it's NOT hard drive by wtarreau · · Score: 1

    I always suspected the term "hard drive" was invented

    It's not "hard drive" but "hard disk drive" or "hdd" if you prefer. The "hard disk" was only the platter you put into the "hard disk drive".

    willy

  76. Great what's next? by Sam+Jackson · · Score: 1

    Great too see all the KY Lubricant and anal jokes are a plenty in this post.

    --
    --- hows it taste mother f$#@er!!!
  77. 1000 writes? by poptones · · Score: 1
    According to Microchip Semiconductor it's been more like 10,000 writes for a few years now. And you don't always have to "write" even if a lot of data is being changed. It's trivially easy for a microprocessor to read a byte to determine whether or not it actually needs to be written before "changing" an area of storage.

    But I don't see how bearing lube is going to make hard drives last longer. Most every hard drive failure I've ever seen was due to seek failure in the read heads, not platters that stopped spinning.

    1. Re:1000 writes? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      This isn't bearing lube, it's surface lube.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  78. in another case of "the blind leading the blind" by Roman_(ajvvs) · · Score: 4, Informative
    If a HDD is using micro-magnets to read/write from the platter, wouldn't the presence of a (relatively) giant magnet in the middle of the platter, bounce other magnetic bits around to such a degree that you'd either require a larger, unusable inner section of the platter, or lose the ability to use magnetic methods of storing data on the platter?

    I can imagine a magnetically floating CD-ROM drive though, since optical systems aren't (measurably) affected by magnetism.

    --
    click-clack, front and back. I'm not moving this car otherwise.
  79. Astrolube? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm too lazy to read the fucking article.

    Did they mention Astrolube?

  80. ugh. what about faster erections and orgasms?! by KingPunk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    hah. who cares about my hard drive!
    what about the hard on?
    when will they design a better lube for faster
    and more sustained orgasms, and longer, thicker and harder erections? pesh!

    i guess this is a "geeks world" ;)

  81. More to it than that I think... by newpath4com · · Score: 0

    Back in the "old days" 10 years ago it was hard to get one of those drives because they COST 10 HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS IN TODAY'S CURRENCY. Gee, it's been a long time since I had a stif... hehehe no, I can't say it either.

  82. Remember that joke from SMAC? by Vintermann · · Score: 1

    "All you ever wanted to know about organic superlubricant, but were afraid to ask"

    --
    xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
  83. Rhymes by riqnevala · · Score: 1

    ...while CD-rom is called "romppu", which has no meaning at all, but looks similar to the other two.

    --
    love slashdot. populate it. use it. abuse it. hate it. kill it. miss it. stop following links, they only kill servers.
  84. For fucks sake you retarded kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just blew all my mod points to downmod (over rated) some of the predictable and retarded "HUHAHAHAHA ASS LUBRICANT JELLY BUAHAHAHA"

    If it's fucking obvious joke. If you see it already posted. If you don't even think it's too funny. ...
    DON'T FUCKING POST IT!

    It's a god damn drag to browse to third page to find some interesting posts because some 12 y/o misfits are given modpoints.

    (Yes, I know I could just filter -gabillion funny, but many times it just happens that there are genuinely humorous posts I like to read.)

  85. Size mattering by MarkCollette · · Score: 1

    Not to thread-jack, but does anyone know where the myth comes from, that size does not matter? I'm just curious.

    1. Re:Size mattering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From guys with small dicks. Where else?

  86. Informative? by anno1602 · · Score: 1

    Informative? Geeeeez. At least not "Insightful".

  87. Re:in another case of "the blind leading the blind by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    No, the presence of a static magnetic field would do nothing to hinder the drive's ability to read and write. Hard drives read and write with time-varying EM fields, which are spectrally far from DC (static field). A coil of wire would only develop an interference current in the presence of another time-variant field.

    The problem with magnetically floating the disc is that unless the disc has a PERFECT mass distribution, the platters would wobble and the thing would likely disintegrate.

  88. WD40 is NOT a lubricant by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    It is a water displacer.... the 40th formula he tried...

  89. oh polyester how i loathe thee by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Polyester is made from petrochemicals, this synthetic is also non-biodegradable, so it is inherently unsustainable on two counts. Making polyester uses large amounts of water for cooling, along with lubricants which can become a source of contamination. The processes is also very energy-hungry.

    IM willing to live with a little less speed, and a little more ecology in my future computer thank-you.

  90. Re: Give me size over speed by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Screw that. I want quantum to bring back the BigFoot in a modern incarnation. 5400RPM, multi-platter, never-fill-it-up goodness. I want multi-TB drives that will fit in the 3.5" spots in my standard case to store video. If I'm streaming 3 sets of HD video at 26Mbps each, thats still way under what current drives can pump, and is trivial on any modern attachment bus. Low speed is more likely to result in a quieter, cooler drive too.

    We've been stuck in the 250-320GB range too long...I'm ready to see some really big drives out there. Mmmmm, two 2TB drives in a HDTivo. Makes my nipples hard just thinking about it.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  91. Superconductors? by JSBiff · · Score: 1

    This idea of a 'suspended' disk that is spun with close to 0 friction, might not be so far fetched. Might still be a ways into the future. But, I seem to recall a popular-sciece type article once upon a time that was talking about levitation and superconductors. The jist of it was a layman's introduction to the principle that it's almost impossible to magnetically suspend something and have it be stable. . . UNLESS you use superconductor's.

    Apparently you can get very stable suspension using superconductors. The only problem currently is, all known superconductors have to be kept very cold (like hundreds of degree's below 0F). But, I think there are materials researchers out there searching for 'high-temperature' superconductors. If they ever find any, then it might become practical to have a suspended disk with very high rotational velocity.

  92. Dixize(tm) by tepples · · Score: 1

    Locker-room "size" is the length of the flaccid penis, but sizes of erect penises vary less than sizes of flaccid penises. Besides, girth matters more for stimulatinG the various nerve centers in the vagina.

  93. Back to 1/2-height form factor? by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

    I think the reason why we're hitting the 350-400 GB limit is the fact current 3.5" hard drives are still using the 1/3-height form factor, the form factor pioneered by Conner Peripherals before they became part of Seagate some years ago.

    If we were to accept 1/2-height form factor again (most system cases can accept 1/2-height 3.5" drives), we could probably put in as much as six disc platters per disk drive and push the storage capacity to 600 GB or higher. Thanks to today's disk drive technologies, the power consumption would probably be not much more than 1/3-height drives and the thanks to cooler-running drive motors, heat dissipation shouldn't be a major issue.

  94. Just a start by kc01 · · Score: 0

    All this is well and good, but when they come out with a lubricant that's anti-viral and flavored, they'll REALLY have something.

  95. did anyone else notice by vtolturbo · · Score: 1

    the PhD advisor's name is Dr. Economy. When you think about it, that's really funny, because it means his name is Doctor James Economy, Doctor of Philosophy. which one is it? economy or philosophy?

  96. I don't know what you mean by presidentbeef · · Score: 1

    I'm still trying to figure out how lubricant is going to help me golf better....oh, well. I suppose anything would help.

    --
    Everything I need to know about copyrights I learned from Slashdot.
  97. New Frontiers! by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    I think I've discovered a new frontier of Karmawhoring. "+1 Porno"!

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca