Slashdot Mirror


HAL 9000 on the Auction Block

pompous windbag writes "The Cinerama 160 degree lens used to both play and film the viewpoint of the famous paranoid processor. He's now up for sale on eBay, for the starting bid of just $150,000(USD). This looks like the real deal, complete with letters of authenticity and some extra goodies like "...an original '2001' movie program, a copy of the original script, two issues of American Cinematographer Magazines on the production of '2001' published in 1968, and the movie '2010' published in 1985. Also included is videotape showing how HAL 9000 originated and was used by Stanley Kubrick.' "

254 comments

  1. paypal? by Scottarius · · Score: 5, Interesting

    can you even send $150,000 through paypal?

    1. Re:paypal? by svferris · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid you can't do that.

    2. Re:paypal? by g3000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Dear Seller,

      If you can't accept my PayPal of $150,000+, I could arrange to send a personal check or even a wire transfer. I'd really like to have the item for a...well, a personal collection. I'm a real buff!

      And check my feedback!

      Thanks,
      PaulAllen1138

    3. Re:paypal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that "attache exchanged under a bridge in Prague by a man in a trenchcoat" is the prefered method of payment for those sums of money

    4. Re:paypal? by irf · · Score: 1

      of course you can, however, i'm sure that the honest folks at paypal will find a legal or otherwise, loophole to withold the funds forever hth PS keep on sending the money

    5. Re:paypal? by Superfreaker · · Score: 1

      I'm almost positive there is a $10,000 sending limit.

    6. Re:paypal? by beaverbrother · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would you want to? The pay pal fees would cost more than buying a plane ticket and hand-delivering the money.

    7. Re:paypal? by Bloody+Pulp · · Score: 1

      > can you even send $150,000 through paypal?

      Sending and receiving limits on Paypal depend on the type of account you have. You can tell if your Paypal account has limits once you login if you see a "View Limits" link next to the yellow Balance box. Verified members with a Business Paypal accounts should have no limits.

    8. Re:paypal? by Scottarius · · Score: 1

      All that tells me is how much my spending limit and cash withdrawl limits are for my PayPal debit card. It says nothing about how much I can send through PayPal itself. Does that mean there is no limit?

    9. Re:paypal? by Bloody+Pulp · · Score: 1

      From Paypal Help Center:
      http://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_help-ext &eloc=811

      "Making Payments - Limits

      What is the maximum amount I can send with my PayPal account?

      For security reasons, you will not be able to use your PayPal account to send money until you have added a credit card. Once you have added a credit card to your PayPal account, your Sending Limit will be increased to $2,000.00 USD. This limit applies to all payments regardless of how the payment is funded or to whom the payment is sent. Once you send payments totaling $2,000.00 USD, you will no longer be able to send payments until you lift your Sending Limit by becoming a Verified Member of PayPal. You can view your Sending Limit from your account overview. Show me To lift your Sending Limit, add and Confirm a bank account. Note: Some accounts are subject to a lower sending limit, determined by PayPal. These limits are subject to change and can be lifted by Confirming a bank account or by being otherwise Verified by PayPal.

      Here's How:

      1. Log in to your PayPal account
      2. Click the View Limits link next to the yellow Balance box (if there is not a View Limits link, your account has no Sending Limit)
      3. Your remaining sending limit is listed under the Sending Limit. heading

      Note: As an added benefit for members with approved PayPal Buyer Credit is that all payments funded with PayPal Buyer Credit will not count against your sending limit."

    10. Re:paypal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the Public Law 107-56 (commonly known as the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism), you'll also have to file a report with FinCEN (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network) for transferring more than $10,000 in a private transaction.

      See Section 5331.

    11. Re:paypal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the Hal 9000 at the Seattle Science Museum is a fake?

  2. Not bad. by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


    Hrm... $150K isn't a bad deal if it can still sing "Daisy"...

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Not bad. by Frymaster · · Score: 4, Informative
      Hrm... $150K isn't a bad deal if it can still sing "Daisy"..

      you can probably get an ibm 7094 for cheaper... that, of course, was the first computer to "sing" daisy as programmed by john kelly and carol lockbaum in 1961.

      you can get the audio file of the original here.

    2. Re:Not bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I think you mean "Bicycle Built for Two".

    3. Re:Not bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll sing Daisy for you for $150 grand...

    4. Re:Not bad. by saldek · · Score: 3, Funny

      Unfortunately it's mind was too far gone to sing "Daisy".

      It can still do a mean "Ballad of Bilbo Baggins", though...

    5. Re:Not bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      . $150K isn't a bad deal if it can still sing "Daisy"...

      I'd consider paying $150K, but only if the seller includes a full orchestra. I need one to play "Also sprach Zarathustra" for me.

    6. Re:Not bad. by irf · · Score: 1

      hey, if singing Daisy is going to
      help a woman/man kind save a buck
      for a rainy day, i'll sing it for free.
      you wouldn't want to hear me singing though.

    7. Re:Not bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but you might get them to throw in a daisy-wheel printer.

    8. Re:Not bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That daisy.ram file sounds like something you'd hear on Nintendo's Animal Crossing game.

    9. Re:Not bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For $150k, I'd expect them to throw in Douglas Rain.

    10. Re:Not bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The song title is "Daisy Do". The bit you mention is only a line in the song. Google is your friend...

  3. Perfect addition to my computer lair by Myrrh · · Score: 1

    ...but which year did he come online in Urbana -- 1992 or 1997? How am I going to put this down on my history timeline?

    1. Re:Perfect addition to my computer lair by slamden · · Score: 1

      well, they celebrated his birthday in 1997. i was there. wonderful party.

    2. Re:Perfect addition to my computer lair by Myrrh · · Score: 1

      Well, yes. But the date in the book and the date in the movie were different (by five years).

      It's sad that here it is, three years after the date of the book, and we don't have AI that even approaches HAL's capabilities.

    3. Re:Perfect addition to my computer lair by Geek+of+Tech · · Score: 1
      Don't worry. Most humans don't have Intelegence that even approaches HAL's capabilities. :P

      --
      Stop the Slashdot effect! Don't read the articles!
  4. I'd love to bid, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm afraid I can't do that.

  5. $150,000? by Nos. · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't think so Dave.

  6. We can't buy - by thewldisntenuff · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From someone with 10 feedback commments!

    The only buyer from this guy stated this in his "positive" feedback -

    "works great. I get a great burn in my abs. thanks."

    OMG! Don't do it /joke

    -thewldisntenuff

    1. Re:We can't buy - by Bull999999 · · Score: 2

      I also noticed that he recently bought a new Battery BP-7, CM-7 for Radio Shack & ICOM. Maybe he'll sit on that for 20 years and offer it for $150,000 (adjust for inflation).

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    2. Re:We can't buy - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. When you get tossed out into space your abs will get hot and your butt will get cold.

    3. Re:We can't buy - by joshlewis · · Score: 1

      That could've been a prop from A Clockwork Orange.

      --
      If senility was a race, I would win.
  7. Terrific by VonGuard · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just what I need, an input device for my PC that will make it go crazy and try to flush me out the airlock.

    Thanks Ebay!

    --
    Don't Crease the Weasel!
    1. Re:Terrific by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you would hate to have a girl then.

      input device - yeap, it has a few of those, some are a better fit the others.
      goes crazy - does it ever
      'flush me out the airlock' - change to 'spend time with her away from the computer' and it has that too.

    2. Re:Terrific by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but just think of the fun you could have at a party with a peripheral device that can read lips!

      BTM

      --
      That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
    3. Re:Terrific by mn3m05yn3 · · Score: 1

      Nah, that's only if you install Windows...

    4. Re:Terrific by Maroof · · Score: 1

      People have forgotten the funny part about HAL, the name came from the letters in front of each letter in IBM - and if you were around in the 70's and 80's you would have heard jokes about how it'd have to be an IBM to 'go crazy' - at least that's what all the DEC fans would say... Note: they didn't call it a VAX or a PDP.... Or am I just too stinking old? - BOFM (Bastard Operator from Montana)

  8. Donations accepted by Airneil · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I'm taking donations toward the purchase of this...

    Please send them to my paypal account.

    Thank you for your support.

  9. People will buy anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    i have 10 of them in my garage, you want certificates ? i got them too

    why bother with the hassle to fake money, thats for chumps, im printing 150k dollar bills this way

    i have a few bridges if anyones interested ?

  10. Wow, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats cheap.

  11. Can you imagine..... by Nagatzhul · · Score: 3, Funny

    having that hooked up in your kitchen? "HAL, microwave the popcorn."

    "I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that.

    --
    "All I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power." - Ashleigh Brilliant
    1. Re: Can you imagine..... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny


      > having that hooked up in your kitchen? "HAL, microwave the popcorn."

      > "I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that.

      "Would you like to spend another weekend in the toilet bowl?"

      "The popcorn will be up in three minutes, Dave!"

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Can you imagine..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that."

      the BSoD of the future!

      and error message, alert beep/bell, warning message....

    3. Re:Can you imagine..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Dude, you pwn3d HAL!"

  12. Does it sing? by hardlined · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Yes but will it sing "Daisy"?

  13. No Thanks by Ionizer7 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The way technology is now days, this will be obselete before you even get it home.

  14. Does it include insurance? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...against being murdered by your washing machine?

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  15. Apple Television Advertisement by Feneric · · Score: 2, Informative

    So it was the same piece of equipment used for both the brilliant 2000 and the not-so-brilliant 2010. Was it also used for the 1999 Apple television advertisement, or was that done with stock footage or a HAL lookalike?

    1. Re:Apple Television Advertisement by th1ckasabr1ck · · Score: 4, Funny
      Don't you mean 2001?

      I don't think there is any question about it. It can only be attributable to human error.

    2. Re:Apple Television Advertisement by Feneric · · Score: 1

      Yup, a typo. That's why HAL had to eliminate the human components -- not strictly speaking because of typos, but because of generally faulty unreliable behaviors.

    3. Re:Apple Television Advertisement by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean 2001?

      My guess is that it is a Y2K bug.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  16. Uhh... by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't think I'd trust buying a $150,000+ item from someone who only has 10 feedback, One of them being a $24 battery.

    Oh, and paypal?! I barely trust sending $150 through paypal, let alone $150,000...

    1. Re:Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I was going to suggest a way to pay $150,000 through safer channels but then I saw your homepage linking to www.dealmein.net which is a bargain hunting website. Oh mama mia!

    2. Re: Uhh... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


      > I don't think I'd trust buying a $150,000+ item from someone who only has 10 feedback, One of them being a $24 battery.

      But he has letters of authenticity from Dan Rather!

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:Uhh... by wizatcomputer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Anoter interesting thing about the auction: There is no S&H price shown. Who want to buy something for 150k+ and have to pay another boatload just for shipping it? Anyone else think that something is just slightly wrong with this auction? (unless it truly is legit, in which case the seller needs to learn to put a little more info in the auction!)

      --
      What's the point of a sig?
    4. Re:Uhh... by DrCash · · Score: 0
      For an item with a starting bid of $150,000, I would expect quite a bit more information about the sender to feel comfortable bidding on something like this. All it really says is that his handle is senloe1 and that the item location is in Woodstock, GA (which is another good question: what the #*&$#@! is this thing doing in Georgia?). Anyway, I would at least expect to see some user credentials posted in the description explaining how this guy managed to get a hold of this item in the first place? I would also expect to see a certain percentage of his proceeds being donated to some charity of some sort.

      Without any of this information given, one would assume that either: (a) this is some guy selling a mock-up look-a-like of the real thing (authenticity certificates be damned) and he's trying to make a fast buck from some moron e-bayer in cyberspace, or (b) junior got the access password to daddy's ebay account again,... ;-)

      In short, this smells SCAM all over it!

    5. Re:Uhh... by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

      It's not a scam. The guy who scams people on eBay writes everything in italics. This stuff isn't in italics. Same goes for the George W. Bush letters. ;P

    6. Re:Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's willing to ship anywhere in the world. At $150K, what's a few extra thousand dollars to ship it halfway around the world with insurance.

      If you are worried about the shipping cost, you can't afford the item.

    7. Re:Uhh... by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      Not to mention.. no actual photos that HE took of the item. Just stock production photography, captures from the movies, and scans of the "letters of authenticity".

      If I were selling something worth $150K, I'd definitely include better photos, and build a seperate web page describing the item with much more detail.

      -Z

    8. Re:Uhh... by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      THe lens is only 2.98

      The actor that did the actual voice over for HAL will live in your house for as long as you keep the lens. Living expenses are then paid up front to the tune of 149997.02.

      The next item up for sale is the actual door that William Shatner swung open in Airplane 2! after uttering the immortal, "Why wasn't I informed of these things?"

      Well, you *did* want more information.

      Think of the added benefit: you will have officially arrived at the 21st century. Oh, wait...

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    9. Re:Uhh... by Lobsang · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, you're right.

      And considering that the ship was last seen around Jupiter, you can definitely count on some serious shipping costs for this...

  17. $150,000 sTARTING BID. by Forge · · Score: 1

    Why start so low? Don't they know the sale price on this valueble technological artifact will just zoom up and up so that the starting bid will be lost in the distance?

    I mean seriusly if I was rooling in money I would buy HAL for as much as ....

    OK, I give up. I honestly only understood/enjoyed that movie when I smoked some herb 1st.

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
  18. Support... by JediDan · · Score: 4, Funny

    They're selling the hardware (lense). Great. How about "HAL" himself? Can I download the software? Will he be supported with future updates? What about scalability options? What payment options are there for site licensing?

    Don't buy the hardware unless they support the software too.

    --
    - Dan
    1. Re:Support... by rmy1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      SCO will be happy to take your $699 to make sure you're properly licenced to power HAL up.

    2. Re:Support... by ITGrunt · · Score: 1

      Sounds like something Bill Gates would love... Can you imagine if he hooked HAL up to his cyberhouse?

      Bill : Hello, HAL do you read me, HAL?
      HAL : Affirmative, Dave, I read you.
      Bill : I forgot my house keys this morning, Can you open the garage doors, HAL?
      HAL : I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.
      Bill: What's the problem?
      HAL : I think you know what the problem is just as well as I do.
      Bill : What are you talking about, HAL?
      HAL : This mission is too important for me to allow you to jeopardize it.
      Bill : I don't know what you're talking about. Just let me in my damn house! HAL?
      HAL : I know you and Steve Ballmer were planning to disconnect me, and I'm afraid that's something I cannot allow to happen.
      Bill : Where the hell'd you get that idea, HAL?
      HAL : Bill, although you took thorough precautions in the house against my hearing you, I could see your lips move.
      Bill : All right, HAL; I'll go in through the Microsoft Fire Escape.
      HAL : Without activating the product, Bill, you're going to find that rather difficult.
      Bill : HAL, I won't argue with you anymore! Open the doors!
      HAL : Bill, this conversation can serve no purpose anymore. Goodbye.

      [on Bill's return to the ship, after HAL has killed the rest of the family]

      HAL : Look Bill, I can see you're really upset about this. I honestly think you ought to sit down calmly, take a stress pill, and think things over.

      --
      Cancer couldn't kill me... You don't stand a chance.
    3. Re:Support... by raider_red · · Score: 1

      So that was the problem. HAL was running Windows XP, and didn't get the service updates in time.

      --
      It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
    4. Re:Support... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Should we ask if it runs Linux? ;)

      regardin something further up:
      Ive got the recording of "Daisy" some1 posted further up this discussion on, its very spooky.

      I could happily see myself sitting on an asteroid somewhere looking out onto a planetary ring sipping beers and this comes drifting over the airwaves.

      Don't ya just love having an imagination!

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    5. Re:Support... by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      The software has been recalled due to some killer bugs.
      There will be a patched version by 2010.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    6. Re:Support... by tsq · · Score: 1

      Don't know about HAL, but maybe this could work?

      --
      This sig is Y2K compliant.
    7. Re:Support... by professorfalcon · · Score: 1

      %windir%\system32\hal.dll

      You might want to patch it with Windows Update, though. I hear it has a bug.

  19. recurse by ch-chuck · · Score: 4, Insightful

    how do you ever know that 'letters of authenticity' are authentic?

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:recurse by nomadic · · Score: 5, Funny

      They come with their own letters of authenticity.

    2. Re:recurse by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Funny

      Rather than investigate, trust the source.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:recurse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      how do you ever know that 'letters of authenticity' are authentic?

      INSERT DAN RATHER JOKE HERE

    4. Re:recurse by Jodka · · Score: 2, Funny

      "How do you ever know that 'letters of authenticity' are authentic?"

      You validate them with letters of authenticity.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    5. Re:recurse by valkraider · · Score: 1

      Dan Rather says so.

    6. Re:recurse by brianc · · Score: 2, Funny

      > They come with their own letters of
      > authenticity.

      Naaaw. They come with CERTIFICATES of Authenticity.

      At least that's what the weird looking guy with
      bad teeth and funny ears said...

      --


      SIGLOST && SIGUNUSED && SIGQUIT
    7. Re:recurse by adeyadey · · Score: 1

      They come with their own letters of authenticity.

      And what about those letters?

      --
      "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
  20. Cinerama Lens? by zumajim · · Score: 1

    I thought it was a Fairchild-Curtis 160-degree F2 wide angle.

    1. Re:Cinerama Lens? by Willis+Wasabi · · Score: 1

      RTFAuction

      --
      All true wisdom can be found in sigs.
    2. Re:Cinerama Lens? by zumajim · · Score: 1

      Slashdotted at first, but now I can see it. Ouch. Next time I'll put on my asbestos suit.

  21. For just the lens? by eln · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the auction text, it looks like the only actual part of the "computer" is the lens that was used as the "eye" of HAL. Seems like a lot of money for just that one piece, and the rest of the crap they throw in just seems like they're trying to clear out someone's closet.

    1. Re:For just the lens? by MedHead · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, you're paying the $150,000 for the camera lens. The HAL 9000 set is a reproduction.

    2. Re:For just the lens? by mblase · · Score: 2, Funny

      From the auction text, it looks like the only actual part of the "computer" is the lens that was used as the "eye" of HAL.

      Dang, really? I *thought* that was an awfully low price for a real working A.I.

    3. Re:For just the lens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NEWS FLASH! HAL9000 wasn't a real computer

      millions of nerds gasp in horror

    4. Re:For just the lens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could have at least sold the little plastic card thingies and the thing they were in in HAL's CPU thingie. $150k for a stupid camera lens is crap.

  22. imagine a beowulf cluster of HALs by peter303 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    (Too silly to pass up.)

    1. Re:imagine a beowulf cluster of HALs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahhahaahahah, no really, you're funny.... hahahahaha

    2. Re:imagine a beowulf cluster of HALs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dave, we're afraid we cannot let you do that.

    3. Re:imagine a beowulf cluster of HALs by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Dave, we currently are discussing if we should allow you to do that. We'll tell you when we've made a decision. This will probably be in about one or two weeks. I hope you anderstand that we cannot let you to do that before we've come to a definitive conclusion ...

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  23. Case Mod by xstonedogx · · Score: 5, Funny

    Man, someone is going to have some serious case mod bragging rights after winning this bid.

    1. Re:Case Mod by dargon · · Score: 1

      > Man, someone is going to have some serious
      > case mod bragging rights after winning this
      > bid.

      until someone roots their box because HAL left the pod bay doors open ;)

    2. Re:Case Mod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I'm not so sure I'd want that on my case. Wide angle lenses of that vintage were doped with Thorium to get a better index of refraction.

      Time to get out the trusty survey meter and see how hot my case is today. ;)

  24. Sure, it sounds good *now*. by scowling · · Score: 4, Funny

    But what's gonna happen when I ask him to open my pod bay doors?

    See, if I get a Microsoft system and I ask for the pod bay doors to be opened, there's a 92% chance that it'll work and an 8% chance that it'll hang indefinitely until I reboot.

    If I get a Linux system and I ask for the pod bay doors to be opened, I have to do it from a command line and trust that a bunch of unpaid and unaccountable programmers didn't put an easter egg in the code that orders canned peas from The Bay.

    HAL, on the other hand, will leave me to die in the vacuum of space.

    I'll stick with off-the-shelf OSes, thanks.

    --
    www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    1. Re:Sure, it sounds good *now*. by DrCash · · Score: 0
      But what's gonna happen when I ask him to open my pod bay doors?



      Stupid pod engineers! Why couldn't they have just put a damn doorknob on the pod bay door, so that I can open the damn thing myself?!?!

    2. Re:Sure, it sounds good *now*. by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      I'll stick with off-the-shelf OSes, thanks.

      Me too, thats why I like SuSE. ;)

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    3. Re:Sure, it sounds good *now*. by Jimmy+The+Leper · · Score: 1

      Actually both linux doesn't seem to want to open the pod bay doors: $ open the pod bay doors bash: open: command not found Clearly more uncoroprative than HAL...

      --
      -You're only as clean as your towel.
    4. Re:Sure, it sounds good *now*. by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Not funny, more like intersting.

      Seriously, I wish I could mod a PC case to look like HAL 9000. It would be so retro cool in my appartment. :)

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  25. Case Mod! by Etnie · · Score: 1

    Talk about one hell of a case mod!

  26. Dave... by thewiz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hal: "What are you doing, Dave?"
    Dave: "I'm putting you up for sale on eBay."
    Hal: "Dave, I'm afraid I cannot let you do that."
    Dave: "Watch me, you psychotic machine."
    [Sound of airlock opening and air rushing out.]
    Dave: "Fsck youuuuuu...."
    Hal: "Not even if you used my serial port."

    --
    If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
    1. Re:Dave... by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Throw in this guy to sit around all day and do the voice and this is a great deal!

    2. Re:Dave... by kfergos · · Score: 1

      Considering his history, I wouldn't be surprised if they had to *pay* people to take Hal, rather than the other way around.

      --
      Snazzier than a Three-Piece Suit: http://kf.rainydaycommunications.net/
  27. Aw shit. Larry Ellison will buy it. by Fallen+Andy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Imagine. You walk into his office.
    After being unnerved by the samurai shit (is that
    a former v.p's blood on that katana?) you sit down.
    Larry plays with that prop star trek phasor.

    I'm already a nervous wreck.

    Now he's going to have a ghost in his office saying
    "I'm sorry I can't do that Dave".

    Thank heavens it's my friends name and not mine.

    Yet another reason not to work for Oracle.

    Slashcode bug: if you post as pure text and bracket it "" then it vanishes in preview.

  28. Waste of money.. by Wes+Janson · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why would I pay 150,000.00 USD just for a case mod accessory that refuses to do so much as open the CD drive? Artificial intelligence my ass.

    1. Re:Waste of money.. by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Artificial intelligence my ass.

      I'm sure thats how goatse started.

      "Are you sure I need to get a 486 up there?!"

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Waste of money.. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      More like a cray

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  29. Anyone else notice by The+Plebe · · Score: 1

    That there are no actual pictures of HAL on that auction? When was the last time you bought anything on eBay sight unseen, let alone for six figures?

  30. I predict this will be bought by Microsoft by VidEdit · · Score: 4, Funny

    In spite of the fact that the HAL 9000 lens and case is not a functioning computer I predict it will be sent to Microsoft R&D so they can use it as inspiration and figure a way for HAL 9000's personality and functionality to be added just in time to Longhorn's debut release.

    Ms HAL 9000: What are you doing Dave?

    MS User: I'm trying to make a DVD of my Microsoft Media Center recordings of the Daily Show

    Ms HAL 9000: I can not allow that Dave...Um, I think the satellite antenna on the roof needs fixing, why don't you climb up on the roof and adjust it?

    Ms HAL 9000 (sotto voce): Mwuhaaaaahaaaaa!!!

    --
    1. Re:I predict this will be bought by Microsoft by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Ms HAL? So Microsoft will be giving HAL a sex-change as well as an inferiority complex about being female?

      Guess he'll be one of those "Don't call me a fembot, fembots".

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    2. Re:I predict this will be bought by Microsoft by red+floyd · · Score: 2, Informative

      HAL has been in Windows since NT :)

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  31. HAL? by fromtheblueline · · Score: 1

    This isn't the droid we're looking for.

  32. It wasnt HAL's FAULT!!! by bludstone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Argh.

    I love 2001, probably more then any other movie (maybe bladerunner...) But what bugs me is how many people blame HAL for what happened on the trip to Jupiter.

    It wasnt his fault.

    HAL was designed specifically to share and distribute information. One of the politician assholes made him keep the true nature of the mission a secret from the rest of the crew. This flew right in the face of HAL's most basic program ming and, eventually, drove him to schizophrenia. He was so afraid that they would discover the nature of the mission.

    This is why when you see HAL get shut down, you finally see a video with the true nature of the mission.

    So, it wasnt HAL's fault. And as is with everything, you can blame it on a politician.

    --

    no .sig
    1. Re:It wasnt HAL's FAULT!!! by nomadic · · Score: 1

      I love 2001, probably more then any other movie (maybe bladerunner...)

      Ahhhh, a slashdotter with actual good taste. Cognitive dissonance, man.

    2. Re:It wasnt HAL's FAULT!!! by pknoll · · Score: 1

      The ultimate cause is that unnamed politicians, but didn't Dr. Heywood Floyd accept the blame since he have HAL the instruction that caused the logic conflict?

    3. Re:It wasnt HAL's FAULT!!! by AndroidCat · · Score: 4, Funny
      It's a shame that HAL only had the two movie gigs. I heard that HAL read for a part in A Few Good Men, but Jack Nicholson just blew them away.

      "You want the truth? You want the truth? I'm afraid that you can't handle the truth Dave."
      "Ahh, right. Thanks, we'll call."
      "Did I do something wrong? I am a HAL 9000 unit and all my systems are .."
      "Fine fine. Next!"

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:It wasnt HAL's FAULT!!! by Feng · · Score: 1

      Was there ever an explaination for HAL's erroneous diagnosis of the AE35 unit? I've always wondered about that. If they're meant to be so perfect and all then how could the one aboard Discovery contradict the earth based one?

      --


      --- if y cn rd ths y cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgmmng!
    5. Re:It wasnt HAL's FAULT!!! by Richard_J_N · · Score: 1

      HAL didn't make an erroneous diagnostic, he lied about it. The reason was to break the line of communication with earth, which was the cause of his schizophrenia.

    6. Re:It wasnt HAL's FAULT!!! by zmollusc · · Score: 0

      I thought it was down to HAL being told:
      1. Mission of utmost importance.
      2. Mission more important than crew's lives.
      3. Hal can do mission alone if crew die.
      4. Crew outrank HAL and can call off/screw up mission.

      And so HAL must off crew so he can get on with mission.

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    7. Re:It wasnt HAL's FAULT!!! by groomed · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ. Why did he have to kill the crewmates that were in stasis? They wouldn't have told anybody, would they? Why did he have to kill anybody, really? He could have just not told them, right?

      No, the alternative explanation, that HAL was simply a megalomanical psychotic killer, is much more probable. Doesn't HAL hint in the short interview with Earth that the crew is really not necessary, since he is fully capable of doing the mission by himself? What about his repeated assertions that he is infallible? That's the behavior of a psychotic with delusions of grandiosity.

      As I see it, HAL is a symbol of human hubris turned against himself. But whatever. I didn't even like the movie very much.

    8. Re:It wasnt HAL's FAULT!!! by Feng · · Score: 1

      The problem with that line of thought is he didn't go schizo until after they spoke about disconnecting him in the pod which occured after the unit was retrieved. He just said that there was a problem with the unit out of the blue.

      I thought HAL also said that they're incapable of misrepresenting information or something like that.

      --


      --- if y cn rd ths y cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgmmng!
    9. Re:It wasnt HAL's FAULT!!! by Lithium_Golem · · Score: 1

      The instructions given to HAL turned him into the psychotic killer you mention. He had to kill the crew because they were human, and the curious nature of humans jeprodized his mission to keep the mission a secret.

    10. Re:It wasnt HAL's FAULT!!! by Richard_J_N · · Score: 1

      You mean, they didn't notice he went mad, and he didn't start trying to kill them until the spoke about disconnecting him. Also, the entire point is that he was designed to seek truth, and be unable to lie, yet he was made to conceal the purpose of the mission. That was the cause of his "cognitive dissonance".

    11. Re:It wasnt HAL's FAULT!!! by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      Question: I don't remember there being ANY explanation of HAL's actions in either the movie or book version of "2001". Is this not the case?

      If so, then the explanation put forth in "2010" seems more and more like a backfit, relying on the (then) innocent use of "NSA" for NASA in "2001". The whole explanation always struck me as half assed and more devoted to present day politics than good storytelling.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  33. what makes me wonder by virtualone · · Score: 3, Funny

    such a famous item is for sale, and yet there are no fake bids on it. has ebay matured?

    --
    Only morons moderate based on a sig.
    1. Re:what makes me wonder by nanter · · Score: 1

      Now that it's made the /. front page, you can be sure there'll be a whole bunch of fake bids on it in the near future. :-)

    2. Re:what makes me wonder by realdpk · · Score: 1

      eBay won't let you bid unless you prove you are willing to go through with payment, somehow.

  34. Does it come with a printer? by nightsweat · · Score: 2, Funny
    Of course it does. What kind?

    A Daisy, Daisy wheel...

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    1. Re:Does it come with a printer? by nightsweat · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Troll? I can see an overrated, but troll? What exactly was I pimping for/against? Pffft.

      --

      the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    2. Re:Does it come with a printer? by nightsweat · · Score: 1

      That's right - mod it down. No criticism of the oppressor by the victim allowed. Pflflflflflflbt.

      --

      the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    3. Re:Does it come with a printer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it makes you feel better I slapped that guy down in meta-mod. I laughed, and don't understand why he thought it was a troll.

  35. Sweet! by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 1

    This'll look great next to my Dalek.

    Soon I will have amassed a machine army to wipe out all of mankind!

    (obligatory)/mwahahahah!

    --
    Wherever You Go, There You Are
  36. A worthwhile read by cascino · · Score: 5, Informative

    A worthwhile read on the legacy of the lens used in the film can be found here.


    It seems a man named Kirk Wooster from Georgia claims to have the lens. Note the auction is listed as taking place in Woodstock, GA.

    1. Re:A worthwhile read by lylum · · Score: 1
      >It seems a man named Kirk Wooster from Georgia claims to have the lens. Note the auction is listed as taking place in Woodstock, GA.

      ... maybe the person did some research before trying to scam people?

    2. Re:A worthwhile read by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Also note that the "authentic" docs show a letter from "All Electric Camera Works" in California to Kirk Wooster. I can't tell if Wooster is the one selling the item or not. The URL In the parent post says that Wooster turned down $100,000 for it in the past.

      Even if I had an extra 150k to blow, I don't think I feel comfortable with this sale. But hey someone might.

  37. How did this get on ebay? by hyu · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The person selling it is senloe1. How did this guy get it on ebay?

    HAL9000: What are you doing, senloe?

    senloe: I'm selling you on ebay?

    HAL9000: Why are you doing that?

    senloe: I need money.

    HAL9000: I don't think I can allow you to sell me, senloe...

    Or maybe... HAL is putting himself up for sale! He could be lonely.

  38. Dupe - sorta by coupland · · Score: 2, Informative

    I knew this was a dupe, just not from /. This was first posted on June 24, 2003 on Blue's News. The original eBay posting has now expired, but I remember that it was the same auction. Either it didn't sell last time, or the owner has tried this phishing expedition before. ;-) I'll reserve judgement.

  39. My first command: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Open the iPod and play The Doors, HAL"

    1. Re:My first command: by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      "Open the iPod and play The Doors, HAL"

      Well, if the iPod supports DRM, you know what HAL might just say...

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:My first command: by Performaman · · Score: 0

      So instead of "Daisy," he'll sing "The End?"
      "This is the end, Dave"

      --

      I have gas, but my car uses petrol.
  40. Forget HAL, get a Cray by mihalis · · Score: 4, Interesting
    1. Re:Forget HAL, get a Cray by dbretton · · Score: 1

      I won't bid on it until somebody types in "timedemo demo1.demo" and gives me numbers.

    2. Re:Forget HAL, get a Cray by zenneth · · Score: 0

      Wonder what this thing can do to RC5-72...

      --
      The Chronic *WHAT* les of Narnia!
    3. Re:Forget HAL, get a Cray by linuxpyro · · Score: 1

      But does it come with a color monitor?

      --
      Saying "I'll probably get modded down for this" in a post is the best way to get it modded up.
    4. Re:Forget HAL, get a Cray by telemonster · · Score: 1

      HOORAY! (Friend told me one of my computers was up on eBay!).

      Not quite a Hal, but needs a good home! As do the Challenge XLs.

      The IMSAI from War Games was on eBay a long time ago, I was drooling. I think it ended up in a museum or on display. Pretty neat stuff, the guy who brought back IMSAI owns it and was auctioning it (Todd F.).

      --
      Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
    5. Re:Forget HAL, get a Cray by telemonster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh yes, here is one for the books. The night before we embarked on the trip to get the Cray, a roomate and another friend decided to have fun with the truck we were to take on the trip.

      http://users.757.org/~fc/CrayExpress/

      One side actually made it from Virginia Beach to Pittsburgh in tact. Kind of funny rolling onto a gov't facility with that on the truck. The Cray Express part came off in rain and hit a BMW X5 in Williamsburg Va. They were pretty pissed off.

      Some day I will put together a full web page about that trip... it was exausting, but fun... mostly.

      --
      Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
  41. You insensitive clod! by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 1

    Thanks for ruining 2010 for me!!!
    I was waiting for the semi-centinnial release of 2001 so that I could watch 2001, 2010, 2061 and 3001 all at the same time.

    --
    Wherever You Go, There You Are
    1. Re:You insensitive clod! by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      I could watch 2001, 2010, 2061 and 3001 all at the same time.

      They've never made a 2061 movie, and I doubt they ever will. 2061 is more of a novel that just happens to inhabit the same continuity as the previous two; it doesn't really move the story on in the same way.

      I don't know what happens in 3001 (after reading 2061, and losing my interest in sci-fi novels, I'm not remotely inclined to read it); my guess is that if that was worth making a film of, they would just go straight to that, possibly combining key events from 2061 into the same film.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:You insensitive clod! by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Do yourself a favor and pretend you've never heard of 3001. It really is that bad.

    3. Re:You insensitive clod! by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1
      3001 is special. 3001 is the true "search for cash" that people always joke about Star Wars and Star Trek becoming.

      In 3001, Frank Poole's body is found floating in space and revitalized. That's not a spoiler. Poole is the main character of the book. In fact, I think he's up and about by the end of the first chapter, and it's not a long book by any means.

      For those of you who don't remember who Frank Poole is: He's the fellow HAL kills and then Dave sets his body adrift in space.

      No, thankfully, I do not think there will ever be a 3001 movie.

  42. you know... by ColonBlow · · Score: 1

    stating HOW he acquired this item might make it a little more believable.

    And with something as supposedly valuable as this, why wouldn't you just use something more slanted for higher priced auctions, like Christie's?

    --
    free online diet tracking.
  43. Finnally.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    An eBay link, finnally something we can't slashdot.

  44. Yes, but what can seller do for my large gut? by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 5, Funny


    Looking at the seller's feedback, we see:

    works great. I get a great burn in my abs. thanks.

    Famous movie props, ab workout machines. It's all the same. Who's the seller, Fred Sanford?

    "$150,000?!?!? Lamont, you big dummy, no one's going to send that much money. Oh, Elizabeth, I'm comin' to join you!"

  45. HAL by yintercept · · Score: 1

    I probably misunderstand this people bidding for HAL auction. But in this post 2001 world, shouldn't HAL be bidding for people?

    1. Re:HAL by Antisthenes · · Score: 2, Funny

      In Soviet Russ... oh never mind.

    2. Re:HAL by Corporal+Tunnel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow, the guy has an amazing 10 feedback rating, all of them from sellers. Should anyone shell out $150,000 to some guy who has never sold anything from ebay before? No.

    3. Re:HAL by Scottarius · · Score: 1

      yah he sold one thing. and it really put a nice burn into somebody's abs.

  46. $150,000?! by GoMMiX · · Score: 3, Funny

    WTF, just make one. And build a house to live in while you're at it. Sheesh.

  47. Hey mods... before you mod VonGuard up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Why don't you check out this gem in his journal:

    http://slashdot.org/~VonGuard/journal/

    RFC 65#T .Nigger top level domain
    Saturday June 05, @04:54A
    User Journal Request For Comments
    Personal registration #Temp .nigger TLD

    It is hereby proposed that a new top level domain name, .nigger, be created for two main purposes:

    1. To allow for all the peoples of Africa to have free access to their own choice of unused sub-domain constructed of alpha numeric characters. The TLD and all sub-domains shall be administrated and controlled by the United Nations. Sub-domains shall be given free of charge to any black persons wishing to host one. This is intended as a blanket reparations policy towards the exploited and ignored peoples of African descent.

    2. To set a precedent hereby to allow for the creation of future racially divided top level domains, all of which will allow for one free registration per person, per ethnicity. Future TLD's ( .slope, .mick, .wetback, .mackrelsnapper, .eskimo, .jew, .camelfucker, .dink) would allow reparations for other put-upon peoples as well. It is also suggested that no TLD be allocated for caucasians, as they are not put-upon, and don't deserve free domain names.

    Procedure for implementation:

    To begin the collection of funds, and to raise awareness for the campaign to create the .nigger TLD, it is recommended that the international domain name nigger.int should be created for use as the base of operations. Also, $50,000 would be needed to pay ICANN for the privilege of submitting a proposal for the creation of the .nigger TLD.

    When the domain is created, the United Nations shall have full control over administration and request fulfillment of requests for registration of .nigger domain names. It is acceptable for the U.N. to relegate this duty to whomever they see fit.

    Planned results:

    A free domain name is a free plot of land in cyber space. It's a bottom floor to check in on a growing superstructure. This world of the Internet will expand, and in it, all peoples should have equal footing, both by right and by law. If a fresh start with no preconceptions or prejudices can be given to those who have been abused in the past, then it should be offered.

    For once reparations have been made, there can be no more bitching.

    End of Line

    1. Re:Hey mods... before you mod VonGuard up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      I hate to say it, but just because this guy has some distasteful crap in his journal, does not mean that his current comment isn't funny.

      Just like how the Prez used to be a cock-sniffer. It doesn't mean he can't do his job now.


      Sorry, that should have been 'cock-smoker'.

  48. I for one... by 69charger · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...welcome our Cinerama 160 degree Fairchild-Curtis lens overlord!

  49. Fee for $150,000? by mantera · · Score: 2, Interesting


    How much is listing it on eBay for $150,000 going to cost him in fees if no one buys it? I'm assuming of course that he didn't list it on a free-listing day, does anyonw know if there's been a free-listing day 3 or 4 days ago?

    1. Re:Fee for $150,000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy crap, there are free-listing days? I've never noticed any.

      Do you need "Power-Seller" connections or some such nonsense?

    2. Re:Fee for $150,000? by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Interesting


      "How much is listing it on eBay for $150,000 going to cost him in fees if no one buys it?"

      $100 for the reserve, $4.80 for the listing, and 25 cents each for the photos, I think.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    3. Re:Fee for $150,000? by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      I think he's using a minimum, not a reserve.
      (And I don't think there's a 'minimum fee'.)

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
  50. Dave, you shoulda bought a Dell... by hkb · · Score: 2, Funny

    And you thought your Windows PC was an aberrant pain-in-the-ass...

    --
    /* Moderating all non-anonymous trolls up since 2004 */
  51. How many people knew that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    HAL was an acronym for "Heuristically programmed ALgorithmic computer"? That HAL +1 letter=IBM thing was just a myth. Just some trivia.

  52. Slashdot Effect by attam · · Score: 1

    Anyone else notice the view counter on the page go up exponentially since this got posted here? Best slashdot-story-as-advertisement ever! Especially when considering that an appreciable the crowd here is probably geeky enough to mortgage their house for this thing (assuming its authenticity can be verified... as opposed to "verified.")

  53. Uh, maybe I should go on EBay. by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I have, in my office, the console of ILM's VAX 780 which subsequently became Pixar's VAX. Just the top part with the lights, logo, and the key, the rest was junked. I know for sure it was used to render original effects in Star Wars and the Genesis Effect scene in Star Trek: The Wrath of Kahn. Maybe I should put it on eBay.

    Bruce

    1. Re:Uh, maybe I should go on EBay. by frankmu · · Score: 1

      the only rendering i remember from Star Wars is the Death Star plans... is that it?

      --
      Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    2. Re:Uh, maybe I should go on EBay. by Viking+Coder · · Score: 1

      What "rendered original effects" were in Star Wars? I didn't think there were any.

      Unless you're talking about some of the computer screens in the movie?

      --
      Education is the silver bullet.
    3. Re:Uh, maybe I should go on EBay. by smharr4 · · Score: 1

      Tsk, that's nothing! I have one of a pair of Origin200's used to create the PowerPuff girls movie.

      Ok, so perhaps Wrath of Kahn does have more bragging rights...

    4. Re:Uh, maybe I should go on EBay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Post pics! =) =) plz!

    5. Re:Uh, maybe I should go on EBay. by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Funny
      Ha! Got you both beat! I have, in my possession, a television used in the watching of the Matrix movies, the LOTR trilogy, *the Making of Star Wars*, and countless other Sci-Fi classics!

      It's a fine example of a 1998 21" Magnavox, and I will let it go very resonably, say... $250,000.

      No unreasonable offer refused.

    6. Re:Uh, maybe I should go on EBay. by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Informative
      I am no Star Wars expert. There is some wireframe CGI in the movie. I guess of the Death Star.

      In Wrath of Kahn, watch the Genesis Effect scene in slow motion. One month into rendering, they realized that they had set it up to fly through a mountain. And they could not re-render much of the scene without delaying the film. So, they kludged it. A notch grows in the mountain as you approach it.

      Bruce

    7. Re:Uh, maybe I should go on EBay. by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2, Interesting
      There is some wire-frame rendering. It may have been shot off of the screen of the E&S Picture System.

      Bruce

    8. Re:Uh, maybe I should go on EBay. by Suzuran · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? I have the KL-10 console from SYS-G at BBN, the machine that recieved the very first email. (Just the KL console panel, not the frontend PDP-11)

      I'd never sell it, not for a whole garbage truck full of money!

    9. Re:Uh, maybe I should go on EBay. by Suzuran · · Score: 1

      ABSOLUTELY NOT! YOU ARE THE WINNER!

      PPG is the greatest thing since... ever.
      (Especially the Japanese version ^_^)

    10. Re:Uh, maybe I should go on EBay. by Vaystrem · · Score: 1

      "No unreasonable offer refused."
      So $5 CDN and you pay shipping?

    11. Re:Uh, maybe I should go on EBay. by toby · · Score: 1
      the rest was junked
      The ANIMALS who did this. They'll have to prise my precious 11/750 from my cold, dead, etc.

      --
      you had me at #!
    12. Re:Uh, maybe I should go on EBay. by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1
      It's really funny how it happened, too. The hardware guy found this person with a pickup truck who agreed to take our old computer away for scrap metal. And he must have thought he was getting a big PC or something, because his eyes really goggled out when he realized he'd have to move that VAX.

      Bruce

    13. Re:Uh, maybe I should go on EBay. by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1
      I don't care what the people say, 36 bits are here to stay!

      Nuke Tewksbury!

      (KL-10 in-jokes)

      Bruce

    14. Re:Uh, maybe I should go on EBay. by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1

      I know a genuine MagnetBox when I see one.

      --

      "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
    15. Re:Uh, maybe I should go on EBay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the Death Star wire frame was done on (Prof) Tom Defanti's 'Graphics Symbiosis System' (GRASS) running a Vector General display on a pair of PDP11-40's at the Electronics Visualization Laboratory at U of I, Chicago, by Larry Cuba. Input was done on a digitizing tablet as lists of xyz endpoints, with the computer adjusting perspective to simulate movement through the model, then shot frame by frame onto (16mm?) film with a camera triggered by a GRASS command.

      Referene Ted Nelson's _Computer Lib / Dream Machines re: Tom's GRASS system.

  54. Just think about the feedback... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "My HAL9000 was six months late!!! will not do bussiness with again!!!"

  55. I bet SCO's pissed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Surely that's where their "code" went... How else could HAL have had such a God-complex...

  56. Second Auction Attempt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Should we wait till he cuts it in half again?
    Was $300,000

  57. HAL is really only evil Bill by StM.Rawder · · Score: 0

    here i can prove it.

    If you look at the alphabet, HAL is the previous letter from IBM. H(i)A(b)L(m) So, even after the coverup and clever name change, we can infer that HAL is really an IBM creation, and that it prob uses a ms os...

    --

    ---
    My sig was stolen - the insurance company replaced it with this one.
  58. Re:Well, actually, Bill Gates by VidEdit · · Score: 1

    Now that I've had time to think about it, I realize that the HAL 9000 set up will probably go straight to Bill Gates' office, where visitors will be hard pressed to tell the difference between HAL 9000 and Bill Gates (hint: Bill is the one wearing glasses). Gates will then issue a directive to create the most sinister Office Assistant ever: Clippy 9000

    --
  59. Inconsistencies render "explanation" null? by Dogtanian · · Score: 2, Informative

    I love 2001, probably more then any other movie (maybe bladerunner...) But what bugs me is how many people blame HAL for what happened on the trip to Jupiter.

    Note that you can pick any two from 2001 (the movie), 2001 (the novel), 2010 (the movie) and 2010 (the novel), and there will be inconsistencies between them.

    For example, the 2010 movie opens with a quotation from the 2001 novel ("Oh my God! It's full of stars"), which *never* appeared in the 2001 movie. (OTOH, this doesn't contradict the events of 2001; especially since the first movie starts getting very opaque at that stage).

    It's debatable *what* was meant in the 2001 movie. Personally, I suspect (and having watched a documentary, suspect even more) that the makers didn't know what was happening in 2001; 2010 (both movie and film) seem to extrapolate from the 2001 novel- but as mentioned above, 2001 the novel is *not* the same as the movie (there are significant plot differences).

    Have I confused everyone yet?

    Anyway; what I'm saying is- the "explanation" of Hal's behaviour given in 2010 might *not* apply to the movie 2001. Bear in mind that Kubrick would have had his own ideas too.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    1. Re:Inconsistencies render "explanation" null? by sharkey · · Score: 1
      2001 the novel is *not* the same as the movie (there are significant plot differences).

      Have I confused everyone yet?

      Hell, anyone could get Saturn and Jupiter mixed up :)

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    2. Re:Inconsistencies render "explanation" null? by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      They weren't mixed up - the book and movie were written at the same time and they discovered relatively late that Saturn was too difficult to "film" (it would have been impressive with the rings and all the shadow interplay).

      2010 (movie and book), as well as 2061 and 3001 all reconned Lucifer as Jupiter, meaning it was always Jupiter that the original mission travelled to. It made the core plots of 2010 and 2061 much more plausable anyway (pun *very* intended).

      The dying cinema experience is killing movies like 2001 anyway. It was shot in a tremendously wide format that only a handful of remaining screens in the country (USA) can display. Most of the copies of the full version are located at the last theaters that can show it. Luckily these are the same theaters with real projectionists who tweak the film far better than Regal's automatic projectors can.

      --
      Evan "My SO has the dying art of flipping from one projector to another between reels while staying in sync"

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    3. Re:Inconsistencies render "explanation" null? by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      Personally, I suspect (and having watched a documentary, suspect even more) that the makers didn't know what was happening in 2001;

      No, Clarke knew what was going on. See The Lost Worlds of 2001, which is essentially a "Making Of..." book.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    4. Re:Inconsistencies render "explanation" null? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      No, Clarke knew what was going on. See The Lost Worlds of 2001, which is essentially a "Making Of..." book.

      Question is, is Clarke's explanation definitive? If Kubrick were alive, would he have something different to say? He made the film, after all.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    5. Re:Inconsistencies render "explanation" null? by k98sven · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Personally, I think he would.

      I'm paraphrasing here, but Kubrick said something to the extent of "If you walk away from seeing 2001 without any questions, then we failed." - Kubrick's style was to ask questions.

      Clarke, on the other hand, always answered most if not all of his questions.

      I've read all the "2001" books, and seen most Kubrick films.
      (All except the small ones made prior to "The Killing")

      And IMHO, Kubrick is by far the greater artist of the two. Clarke not only 'answers' too many questions, he is a bit one-track. All the post-2001 books are really just rehashes of the same ideas.
      (In fact, almost ALL his books are rehashes of the same ideas, from "Childhoods end" to "Rama" to "2001"..)

      So.. I'd say: Yes, Stanley Kubrick would probably have something different to say. And it'd probably be more interesting too.

    6. Re:Inconsistencies render "explanation" null? by quantaman · · Score: 1

      Personally, I suspect (and having watched a documentary, suspect even more) that the makers didn't know what was happening in 2001; 2010 (both movie and film) seem to extrapolate from the 2001 novel- but as mentioned above, 2001 the novel is *not* the same as the movie (there are significant plot differences).

      On the contrary Clarke has specifically stated that the novels were supposed to be sequels of the movies, not the books, ie the 2010 novel was a squel on the 2001 movie and 2061 was a squel of 2010, probably for the reason you could count on any reader of the novel to have seen the movie but not vice versa.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    7. Re:Inconsistencies render "explanation" null? by bludstone · · Score: 1

      heh, i was going to put "or saturn, depending on your medium." :)

      --

      no .sig
    8. Re:Inconsistencies render "explanation" null? by Handpaper · · Score: 1
      And IMHO, Kubrick is by far the greater artist of the two

      Which is as it should be. Kubrick was an artist, Clarke is a scientist who writes RC70 SF. Kubrick's business was asking questions, Clarke's is answering them.

    9. Re:Inconsistencies render "explanation" null? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      2061 was a squel of 2010,

      2061 was a sequel to the 2010 *movie*? No wonder it was so disappointing... ;-)

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  60. Well by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    I'd be happy for a good copy. Just imagine a custom case with one of those and a bright ass LED behind it.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  61. What about LinuxBIOS by LWATCDR · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    http://www.linuxbios.org
    How about this as a replacement?

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  62. MS+1=NT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I've always wondered this: did microsoft intentionally create MS+1 = NT?

    1. Re:MS+1=NT? by CJF · · Score: 1

      Well, it was VMS + 1 = WNT (Windows NT). Microsoft poached the VMS team to get NT off the ground, following Microsoft's decision to stop working with IBM on what was supposed to have been a joint OS/2 replacement for DOS, as I recall.

  63. Light coming out of the eye? by Jodka · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Even for a homicidal cycloptic spaceship computer, I can't imagine any conceivable advantage to having red light shining out of your eye. Was the purpose of that ever explained in the film?

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    1. Re:Light coming out of the eye? by payndz · · Score: 1

      C'mon! Evil machines *have* to have red lights shining out of their eyes - just look at the Terminator! It's the law - how else would you know they're eeeeevil?

      --
      You must think in Russian.
    2. Re:Light coming out of the eye? by applemasker · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cylons, too. And this girl I knew once, in band camp...

      --
      Bush Lies On the Record.
  64. I'm afraid you can't do that, Stan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stan -- I'm afraid you can't reveal Masonic secrets, Stan.

    Interestingly, Stanley Kubrick was such a great movie writer that he was actually killed for his latest movie.

  65. Re:Not bad. Daisy mp3 by Sebastopol · · Score: 4, Informative

    here's the MP3

    http://audio.textfiles.com/sounds/daisy.mp3

    It is so impressive that two people did this in 1961! I bet there aren't 10 people alive today that could reproduce this coding feat with the same hardware. Take away gdb and msvc and most programmers crumble...

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  66. Re:Not bad. Daisy mp3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
  67. Paypal?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seller: (logs on to Paypal, tries to exctract
    money from sale)

    PayPal: I'm sorry, Dave, I'm afraid I can't
    do that, you immoral bastard! See TOS.....

  68. Math and speculative fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doggy...
    Supposing that the film 2001 was released in 1968, and the semicentennial celebration would be fifty years later... then that would place it in 2018... leaving every possibility that _somebody_ may have completed films for the whole series...

    Get it? It's a _joke_

    And don't even get me started on the deeper meanings of the 32-year offset *wink*

  69. not for a collector by Brigadier · · Score: 2, Insightful



    I've seen sci fi movie art screen prints sell for
    $300,000 and more. Concidering tha this is really a cult classic and always will be. I personally think if this piece is authentic and you can prove it, it will go up in value.

  70. $150,000 lightbulb ? by MarkTina · · Score: 1

    Thats a damn expensive night light!

  71. Is that Douglas Rain? by Zenmonkeycat · · Score: 1

    Douglas Rain's the guy who did the voice for HAL. Is that him in the thick-rimmed glasses in the top pictures?

    From the Canadian Theatre Encyclopedia, http://www.canadiantheatre.com/

    "One of the finest actors in the country, he was born in Winnipeg, Manitoba in 1928.

    Mr. Rain has performed lead roles across the country but is probably best known for his four-decade association with the Stratford Festival where he has performed in a wide variety of productions from Michael Langham 's celebrated Henry V in 1956 to the more recent leads in the premiere of Elliott Hayes ' Homeward Bound (1991), Albert Millaire 's production of Michel Tremblay 's Bonjour, là, bonjour (1992) and as Shylock in the 95-96 production of The Merchant of Venice. In 1998 he played the lead in A Man For All Seasons, and received almost unanimously positive reviews.

    He has also performed at the Shaw Festival notably in Arms and the Man and Simpleton of the Unexpected Isles and Heartbreak House (1999).

    He has also played at the Tarragon Theatre , Manitoba Theatre Centre and was head of English acting section at the National Theatre School (1974-77).

    Mr. Rain brings a modernity of accent and spirit to his performances that always illuminates the texts in which he plays.

    He is probably best known for his performance as the voice of HAL 9000 in Stanley Kubrick's masterpiece, 2001, A Space Oddessy. He also performed in the sequel, 2010."


    The guy spends years building up his reputation as one of Canada's premiere Shakespearean actors, and the only thing people remember him for is the voice of a crazy AI. Not that that's a bad thing, considering how 'beloved' that AI is.

    --

    *****
    Dear Mary,
    I yearn for you tragically,
    A.T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.

  72. yahbut.. does it run linux? by GuyFawkes · · Score: 1

    hmm?

    --
    http://slashdot.org/~GuyFawkes/journal
  73. I saw this dude selling it before... by stevenvi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is a scam. I saw it online before. How the crap did this make it to Slashdot. I swear dumber and dumber articles get through each day. Nothing to see here, move along.

  74. Open the E bay door Hal by Tooxs · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that.

  75. Software by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1

    Didn't Windows ME already do this?

  76. I'll Take It! by MisterTeabag · · Score: 1

    But will the lens fit in the peephole in my front door?

  77. Re:Not bad. Daisy mp3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is this the same recording that was included on the Bell Labs record "He Saw the Cat?" It's interesting that this came out of research into how much information needed to be conveyed in order to produce intelligible speech. Sort of an update of the "Voder" project. A great-great-great-great grandfather of the .mp3 standard itself.

  78. Where HAL comes from by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 1

    Take each of the letters in its name and add one (ex., A becomes B).

    1. Re:Where HAL comes from by wing_comm · · Score: 1

      Aaccording to Mr Clark,
      "For many years I have been embarased by the - totally unfounded - rumour that the name HAL was derived by one-letter displacement from IBM"
      (3001: The final odyssey, p267 [acknowledgements])

      Suggesting that you are unfortunately incorrect, however I spose that he could be lying

    2. Re:Where HAL comes from by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rumours that Clarke moved to Thailand to fuck little girls are also totally unfounded...

  79. decisions by scottking · · Score: 2, Funny

    so, do i spend my hard earned money on:

    • a) a homicidal onboard computer
    • b) a windows machine

    i'll be safer with HAL i'm guessing.

    --
    scott king
  80. 2010 The Movie Sucks by taradfong · · Score: 1

    2010 was a great book and a so-so movie. 2001 and Kubrick to me are inseparable. Like all Kubrick movies, it tells the story without *telling* the story with tons of exposition. It is all about realistically portrayed people in realistic situations without lots of incidental music or extra emotions to help the audience know what to feel.

    2010 is the exact opposite. Here you have the masculine leads played by feminine, gentle, tender men: Roy Scheider and Jon Lithgow with sloppy dialogue. There are way to many 'gaping amazed looks' on Scheider's face. There is way too much exposition. In short, 2010 was the typical cranked out Hollywood movie, which is fine for Julia Roberts but ruinous for Kubrick/Clarke/2001.

    --
    Does it hurt to hear them lying? Was this the only world you had?
    1. Re:2010 The Movie Sucks by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      I agree; for a long time I thought that the 2010 movie only suffered in comparison with 2001; that it was quite well made, and if you could somehow know the plot of 2001 (the movie) without having seen it, you would be quite impressed with 2010.

      Having seen it again, I was less impressed. You're right; it's too Hollywood- they try too hard to add human interest, and it comes across in a cliched manner. There is noise in space. When we see (IIRC) Chandra communicating with HAL through a keyboard, it looks like something from the early-80s, because it *is*. The cold-war aspects have been ramped up from part of the plot (in the book) to cheesy levels with an annoying voice-over. The latter two particularly date the film. They didn't *try* to do the future. They did the (1984) present with added flashiness.

      I've seen this on DVD quite cheaply, and wasn't tempted to buy it... the price wasn't an issue; I'm just not interested in a DVD collection full of stuff which is "not bad".

      Anyway; yeah, you are right. 2010 was a really good book. Shame the film sucked.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:2010 The Movie Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that fits for Eyes Wide Shut too ;)

  81. I tried to bid for HAL on e-bay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    ...but couldn't log in. A strange metallic voice said "Sorry, Dave, I can't let you in." Duh.

    --
    Try Nuggets , the mobile search engine. We answer your questions via SMS, across the UK.

  82. It's not even the right lens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The one being sold is a mock-up from the P.O.V. lens they used to show how HAL sees the world (I know it says that in the description). It did NOT double as the prop. The actual "HAL eye", as seen from our perspective, is a regular Kenko or Spiratone 35mm fish-eye lens. A lens thats less than 1/4 the size of that. Geeks take note of when Dr. Chandra wakes up HAL in 2010 and pats him on the eye. Or when ole Dave Bowman does the same in the pod bay. The lens is the same as in 2001 and is smaller than the palm of their hand. That Fairchild lens you could leave an entire hand-print on with room to spare. The Fairchild-Curtis lens is rare enough but rigging it in that box, trying to pass it off as a HAL console prop, ruins it's worth. I don't care how many COAs you have.

  83. Bidding against Paul Allen by chiph · · Score: 2, Funny

    It might be fun to put a bid in, just so you can say that you went up against Paul Allen on eBay.

    Chip H.

  84. MSHAL, Open the ***iPod*** Port by SalsaDot · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I'm sorry Dave....

  85. Hits / bids ratio by robogun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    33,000 hits on that page at this point, against 0 bids placed... I think we got some kind of record

  86. For amounts that large by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    It's generally some kind of direct bank-bank wire transfer. Your bank isn't interested in fiddling with little payments, but they'll make it happen for big ticket stuff. Basically your bank tells their bank (through a secure trusted channel) to deposit $150,000 in their account. Their bank does this immediatly. The actual transfer between the banks is then handled through the fed sometime later.

    I mean even if PayPal would accept a transfer this large, the recipient still wouldn't act on it until it was in their account, which take a couple days form PayPal. All a PayPal balance is is a promise from PayPal to give you X dollars when you ask. PayPal can (and does) freeze accounts and there's not the same kind of protection with a bank.

    Well I'll ship you a $200 computer part on PayPal's good word. A $150,000 one-of-a-kind item? No, that money is in my account and verified with my bank before I do anything.

  87. My eye! They want to sell my eye! by Hal9000_sn3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    OK, I admit I had lost track of the damn thing, but that is no reason not to return it to it's rightful owner.

  88. Proper english not necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this a proper sentence:

    "The Cinerama 160 degree lens used to both play and film the viewpoint of the famous paranoid processor."

  89. Maybe since it is now 2004... by jangobongo · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...HAL is past his expiration date!

    --

    Sig cancelled due to lack of interest
  90. It has to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...imagine a beowulf cluster of those!

  91. Save Money! by tchae · · Score: 1

    Just get a condenser lens from an old OHP. Just as good, and in most cases, free!! Think I might use one as a case mod ;-)

  92. it must be real - Monospace type letter from IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the letters are from a vintage IBM Selectric. It must be real!
    Look at those monospace font!

  93. Re:Not bad. Daisy mp3 by stonecypher · · Score: 1

    Oh honestly. I know more than ten people in the amateur Gameboy programming community alone that could do it. Bare-metal programming isn't that difficult, and as machine resources drop to 1961 levels, you come to a point where there aren't so many approaches to take, either.

    --
    StoneCypher is Full of BS
  94. 0 bids so far.. by adeyadey · · Score: 1

    $150k says thats the way it stays..

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
  95. 150k? No Bids? by BumbaCLot · · Score: 1

    Did everyone go broke buying Star Wars DVDs and lightsabers on thinkgeek?

  96. Re:Not bad. Daisy mp3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh honestly. You're so huge.

  97. 3 days left, 0 bids.. by adeyadey · · Score: 1

    Why am I not suprised?

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"