Slashdot Mirror


Google Eyes Domain Registration Market

1sockchuck writes "Google is now an ICANN-approved domain name registrar, an intriguing move that could be tied to its blog hosting service, Blogger. Yahoo recently dropped its domain prices to $4.98, as hosting companies use domains as a cheap way to lure customers. Registrar status could allow Google to compete aggressively on price. Bloggers seem to resist paying for hosting, so cheap domains might help Google's plans for world domination."

239 comments

  1. Well... by Blue-Footed+Boobie · · Score: 1, Informative

    They may replace [insert favorite registrar here] if they have good pricing!

    --
    DAMN YOU OCTODOG! DAMN YOU TO HELL!
    1. Re:Well... by GamesNET · · Score: 1

      Great ! Now our domains can get hijacked at newer, bigger registrars! Thank you ICANN !

    2. Re:Well... by l810c · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I think domains are cheap enough. It's already hard to get something similar to what you need.

      Imagine if they get down close to free? There will not be anything sensable left.

    3. Re:Well... by all+your+mwbassguy+a · · Score: 1

      maybe theyll create the .fart TLD.

  2. The possibilities... by trekstar25 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They could easily pair this with a free hosting solution, something like Geocities, perhaps - a gig of free website development space, as long as you put the AdWords on it.

    1. Re:The possibilities... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd certainly move my modest site to Google were the option available...

    2. Re:The possibilities... by KinkifyTheNation · · Score: 1

      This I would definitely use instead of my own hosting, as I would have the ads on my site anyways.

    3. Re:The possibilities... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Google? I'd hit it.

    4. Re:The possibilities... by thogard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They already can provide free hosting since they are going to store the data anyway. It makes it an easy problem if they can build a blog engine that keeps stuff in their own stripped down format but still look good for the people reading.

    5. Re:The possibilities... by viva_fourier · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And, why not? Maybe they're somehow more able to efficiently search their own data-tanks than other companies'...

      The crazy thing is, I can see my someone as innocuous as my grandma opening up a rinky dink blog on quilting techniques and muffin recipes and generating more revenue through adwords than I'll ever make in my life as a frickin engineer...

      --
      and now back to the fallout shelter...
    6. Re:The possibilities... by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

      Thats exactly what I was coming here to post.

      And they wouldnt even need to be a registrar:

      [mysite].google.com

      and they just need to manage the [mysite]

      Maybe even come up with something like:

      [mysite].[region].google.com

    7. Re:The possibilities... by anti-trojan · · Score: 3, Informative

      But this time Google may not pay you for the income.

    8. Re:The possibilities... by cokeyko · · Score: 0, Redundant

      yes, me too.

    9. Re:The possibilities... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bro I already hit up on it, don't bother.

    10. Re:The possibilities... by lachlan76 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If they gave the hosting for free they wouldn't give you money for the ads.

    11. Re:The possibilities... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They may not necessarily be signing up to offer domain registration service. AOL is a registrar too, but do not offer the service. They signed up merely to have an efficient, cheap way to register domains in bulk.

    12. Re:The possibilities... by danheskett · · Score: 1

      How do you know?

    13. Re:The possibilities... by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Because there is no money in it for them.

  3. The question is... by froggero1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    can I host my website out of gmail?

    --
    ~/.sig: No such file or directory
    1. Re:The question is... by mgoss · · Score: 5, Funny

      can I host my website out of gmail?

      No, but you can out of emacs.. ;)

    2. Re:The question is... by digismack · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Seems as though they could easily implement @yourdomain.com email addresses using the Gmail interface.

      That would be slick.

      --
      http://www.hollowdepth.com
    3. Re:The question is... by froggero1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, if they couple that with their spam filter, I'd pay a hefty chunk of change for it.

      <drools>

      --
      ~/.sig: No such file or directory
    4. Re:The question is... by Paladin814 · · Score: 1
      This was one of my first "Feedback" suggestions when I got my gmail account. A slick interface like this should be available for non @gmail accounts.

      My work automatically drops e-mails from "free" systems as they consider it spam or not work related. I assume other companies do this as well and this is the main reason why I can't use a gmail.com as my main e-mail address.

    5. Re:The question is... by SCVirus · · Score: 1, Informative

      Point the domain you buy to your machine thats running apache off gmailfs.

    6. Re:The question is... by SinaSa · · Score: 1

      The one thing I noticed nobody asked after I read the comments (at +3) is this:

      If I register my domain with google, can my Gmail account now become myname@mydomain.com if I want? I think that would be some nice functionality.

      --
      --
      The last digit of pi is four.
    7. Re:The question is... by newker · · Score: 1

      i just hope if google will have domain registration, they will also partner it with 1GB disk space hosting, just like gmail :) so whats the expected price range, when that is pushed through?

      --
      anything is made affordable...
    8. Re:The question is... by fmobus · · Score: 1

      wow... imagine a beowulf cluster of these...

    9. Re:The question is... by Barryke · · Score: 1
      Seems as though they could easily implement @yourdomain.com email addresses using the Gmail interface.
      That would be slick.
      You can do this already:
      1) Let your own domain email (example) me@lastname.eu forward to you@gmail.com
      2) And set me@lastname.eu as the reply adres in gmail!

      Works fine for me, and if my inbox is full i just forward me@lastname.eu to you_part2@gmail.com
      for example. Doesn't get any better :)
      --
      Hivemind harvest in progress..
    10. Re:The question is... by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      I've encountered the occasional paranoid thinking I'm someone naughty pretending to be the real me.

      Plus, for small businesses, having it come from the real deal helps with your credibility.

    11. Re:The question is... by goslackware · · Score: 1

      can I host my website out of gmail?

      Well, yes you can. Using your blogger site, enable the setting "Mail-to-Blogger Address" and make a secret name code. Then you just email your post to yourbloggerusername.secretcodename@blogger.com

  4. Monopoly by mboverload · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Email, books, images, video, domain name registration and more...When will they run everything ont he internet?

    1. Re:Monopoly by nizo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yep, it looks like they have it all covered.

    2. Re:Monopoly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      From Google-Rumor-Of-The-Day.com: "Breaking News: Google registers domain GSearch.com! In an apparent move to take over search engine giant Altavista, Google has registered the domain GSearch.com. Is Google about to move into the search engine market? Only time will tell."

      Oh wait a second...

    3. Re:Monopoly by Cyhawkalewagee · · Score: 1

      Soon my pet, Soon the CEOs of Google will Outstrip Microsoft's Strangle hold on the world! Bawahahah. Just think, 10 years from now we can call Dr. Eric Schmidt instead of old Mr. Gates. (Who, according to another /. article link, is unfit to lead.. ) All hail Google! * bows and grovels at the doorstep of google's crystal palace.* I'm not worthy! I'm not worthy! Seriously though, give them a few years :P

    4. Re:Monopoly by Cracell · · Score: 1

      I don't think google will enter the search engine market, it's simply not profitable because there are so many out there, and the fierce competition between yahoo, microsoft and oh whoops google

      --
      Signatures are so 90s
  5. So by nizo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Will domains registered through them rank higher in search results?

    1. Re:So by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Probably not.

      Google is an advertising company. If their results are skewed, people might start using a competitor, and they lose out on ad revenues.

      --
      "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

      - Seneca
    2. Re:So by KinkifyTheNation · · Score: 1

      Ask yourself this: Does it sound evil?

    3. Re:So by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Probably not.

      Google is an advertising company. If their results are skewed, people might start using a competitor, and they lose out on ad revenues.

      Unless ... they're attempting to attract their advertisers to register through them.

      dum-da-dum-dum dum-da-dum-dum-DUM!!!

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:So by fm6 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Google is an advertising company. If their results are skewed, people might start using a competitor, and they lose out on ad revenues.
      You're assuming they will act logically and with foresight. With Google, that's probably a safe assumption, but it hasn't been for other search engines. Infoseek, for example, got taken over by Disney, which turned it into a the "portal" go.com, and tried to con people into going to Disney-owned sites. To be fair, they did this with web page gimmicks, not by bogus search results. But users still didn't care for it. It helped destroy the portal, though not as much as Disney's failre to invest in ongoing search engine R&D.
    5. Re:So by sporty · · Score: 1

      Not to burst your bubble, but they already skew their results. When they bought the adwords thing from about.com, part of the deal was to push about's rankings higher.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    6. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Do you have any evidence, or are you just trolling?

    7. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, nothing will ever change that. Google holds pride in returning non-corrupted search results.

  6. Off topic, but I don't really care. by slinky259 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I love Google...

    What else is new?

    1. Re:Off topic, but I don't really care. by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      I love Google... What else is new?

      Me, too. I've even got a couple coffee mugs and am hoping for a shirt.

      cheap domains might help Google's plans for world domination."

      I for one welcome our new Goo-Goo-Googling Overlords.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Off topic, but I don't really care. by Alascom · · Score: 1

      Get your Google-warez here...

      www.googlestore.com

  7. World domination by Cambrant · · Score: 5, Funny

    It seems that Google is now competing for Microsofts held place as world ruler. They are literally getting into every buisness available. So far so good, but what's next? Google-approved real-estate? Google water supply?

    1. Re:World domination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nonsense! I did a search and didn't find anything like that.

    2. Re:World domination by Cambrant · · Score: 1

      Use the manual, Luke! http://www.google.com/intl/en/help/index.html

    3. Re:World domination by roror · · Score: 1

      "what's next? Google-approved real-estate? Google water supply?"

      Let me know when they open google pantry. I heard their pantry is GOOD.

    4. Re:World domination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So far so good, but what's next? Google-approved real-estate? Google water supply?

      I'll take a Google calculator any day.

    5. Re:World domination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Google Ice Rinks featuring GooglePlexiGlass

      Google Eyewear -- Googles

      Official sponsor of a country -- Portoogle

      Recipe database -- Googlicious

      Music Portal -- Radio Google (Radio Ga Ga)

    6. Re:World domination by NoTheory · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What google is doing is not Monopolizing. They're doing vertical integration. They're not the dominating force in any of their fields excluding search technology, and their position their is a precarious one.

      They are not, nor likely will they be a monopoly.

      On that note, size does not indicate malevolence. Companies that continue to have drives to do things (as opposed to exclusively being interested in sucking money out of their customers) are not the sort of threat that people keep making them out to be.

      It's not the size that matters, it's the corporate culture.

      --
      There are lives at stake here!
    7. Re:World domination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Dogs with stupid haircuts -- Poogles.

    8. Re:World domination by game+kid · · Score: 4, Funny

      I take it you know about their Web calculator via the search field, then. Here's one larger expression I tried.

      I wouldn't mind a myname.google.com seeing the results of that.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    9. Re:World domination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Or a version of Am-i-hot-or-not with Foogly

    10. Re:World domination by EnsilZah · · Score: 5, Funny

      In a few years you'll be driving your google to the google to buy some google for your google.

    11. Re:World domination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said anything about a monopoly?

    12. Re:World domination by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Nonsense! I did a search and didn't find anything like that.

      You're only saying that because noone ever has!

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    13. Re:World domination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's not the size that matters, it's the corporate culture.


      My ex used that same line on me. But she was lying, the size *does* matter.

    14. Re:World domination by DrKyle · · Score: 1

      Microsoft as world leader? I guess you've never witnessed such behemoths as GE, Disney and Time/Warner.

      How about flying to Universal Studios, having a heart attack from all the flashing lights( do they make lights though?), getting an ECG at the hospital while watching the news story about your accident on TV?

      Yes, all that and more courtesy just one might conglomorate. If only I wasn't lazy I'm sure I could have double the examples at least.

    15. Re:World domination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny as hell :)

    16. Re:World domination by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Really? So, just how well endowed was "she"?

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    17. Re:World domination by MonkWB · · Score: 0

      Obviously Google took over the search and just didn't show you their plans. The Monopoly first hand!

    18. Re:World domination by jephthah · · Score: 1

      i just found my new sig.

    19. Re:World domination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True - However, offering free products to take over a market kills competition. This is a tatic used by wal-mart and microsoft. Google took a big chuck of dollars OUT of the hosting business by being the first to give away free blogs. NO wonder "bloggers resist paying for blogs". SO let's now give them free domain names and soon after that, free computers, after that, maybe we'll get that google automobile. Google has become EVIL.

    20. Re:World domination by biryokumaru · · Score: 1

      the microsoft comment is especially salient considering the recent suggestions of a google os.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    21. Re:World domination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      SO let's now give them free domain names and soon after that, free computers, after that, maybe we'll get that google automobile. Google has become EVIL.

      So, I give you a piece of gum and now you expect a private jet from me? Gosh, remind me not to do anything for you.

    22. Re:World domination by phalse+phace · · Score: 1

      How about a museum? They could call it the Googleheim.

    23. Re:World domination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Us Australians have already beaten them to it! http://www.googlecom.com.au/

    24. Re:World domination by malfunct · · Score: 1

      Except that googles plan seems to be to track your behavior in EVERYTHING you do on the web and aggregate this to sell prime info (directly or indirectly through well targeted advertisement) to the highest bidder. I'm not 100% sure that this is really in the realm of "do no evil".

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    25. Re:World domination by SilverwoodUG · · Score: 1

      In a few years you'll be driving your google to the google to buy some google for your google.

      dont you mean "In a few years you'll be driving your Gcar to the Gstore to buy some Gfood for your Gdog."

    26. Re:World domination by snotclot · · Score: 1

      What about the theory that Google's search is literally going to become the backbone of the internet, since everyone is now using only their search engine? Then we must fear google, but by then it has become too late.

      Well, that sure came across as paranoid.
      Think: Googlezon // ok, tinfoil hat off

    27. Re:World domination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the size that matters, it's the corporate culture.

      So what you're saying is, it's not the size of the ship but the motion in the ocean?

    28. Re:World domination by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      A good example of Google Calc is figuring out how long a download will take.
      Lets say your legal backups are a 2cd release( 700megabytes * 2), and you can get them at 250KB/s:
      Search for:
      ((700 megabytes *2) / 250 kilobytes) seconds

      I'd really love a CLI version of the google calc to replace bc. I emailed googles idea box but never got a reply.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    29. Re:World domination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate when people repost old comments. I KNOW I've read this one before.

    30. Re:World domination by dabraun · · Score: 1

      Another way to look at it ... Google is using their dominant position in the search market to extend themselves into other markets. That's not an opinion really - it's exactly what they are doing - and it's what any business that is successful in one market and wants to get into other markets must do.

      And it's what Microsoft does - except that somehow it's supposed to be "wrong" when Microsoft does it.

      Think it's different? Google has links to a variety of non-search services they offer on their search homepage. I don't see any way for 3rd parties to place their alternatives there ... Google is using that space which they have complete control over to promote their own services. Not all that different from Microsoft using the PC desktop to do the same thing.

      The problem for Microsoft is that they were *too* successful in their first few markets - so some people have decided they shouldn't be allowed to use their success to help them enter other markets.

      We all strive to succeed in this society. We all strive to take down those who have succeeded in this society.

  8. So whats the big deal? by Liveandletlive · · Score: 0

    I think google is throwing stones at random hoping that atleast one will hit the mark like the search engine thing.

    --
    I know the world exists because I exist.
    1. Re:So whats the big deal? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      I think google is throwing stones at random hoping that atleast one will hit the mark like the search engine thing.

      That's pretty close to Microsoft's business model. They got lucky on the O/S and have made big zorkmids on Server and Office. Most of their other forays, quite a few, have lost them massive piles of cash.

      Google isn't trying to push crap on people that they don't need, they just make it available and all the cost is in development, with little invested in hardware or marketing. Word of mouth works well for them (escpecially on /.)

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  9. What is the cost per name to Google? by MBraynard · · Score: 0, Troll
    Anyone know what a registrar has to pay per domain?

    I get mine for $5 at icdsoft. I just had a client go out and pay $140 for two years with NetworkSolutions. There is a big variation. I can bet that when Google starts letting people register, no one will be paying Network Solutions that much anymore.

    Sig: Be one of the 4 to complete an offer to help me get a free console and I paypal you $10. Help me out!

    1. Re:What is the cost per name to Google? by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

      Perhaps this is Google's way of deleting Verisign from the playlist?

      "I didn't know he had such reason to hate them."

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    2. Re:What is the cost per name to Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one with any sense has used NetSol in a while. A bunch of overpriced rude Vogons, who wouldn't even raise a finger to transfer a domain without orders signed in triplicate, sent in, sent back, queried, lost, found, subjected to public inquiry, lost again, and finally buried in soft peat for three months and recycled as firelighters.

    3. Re:What is the cost per name to Google? by Wakkow · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, they would still have to pay the registry $6 per domain like everyone else.

    4. Re:What is the cost per name to Google? by damiangerous · · Score: 3, Informative
      I believe it's $6. I couldn't find it explicitly stated anywhere, but if you read through How to become a .com/.net registrar" you find this passage:

      The minimum payment security is equal to at least the number of anticipated monthly registrations x number of years (minimum one year and maximum of ten years) x $6 USD registration fee.
    5. Re:What is the cost per name to Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut up you fucking spammer.

    6. Re:What is the cost per name to Google? by MBraynard · · Score: 1

      Oh. Ok. That's all I wanted to know. I suppose that ICDSoft and Yahoo are selling them at a loss.

    7. Re:What is the cost per name to Google? by chesterjosiah · · Score: 1

      What is your email address?

    8. Re:What is the cost per name to Google? by signe · · Score: 1

      For the com/net registry, this is correct. That probably doesn't apply to other, less regulated registries, like CC or TV.

      -Todd

      --
      "The details of my life are quite inconsequential..."
    9. Re:What is the cost per name to Google? by MBraynard · · Score: 1

      Why do you ask? Thanks for signing up - once it shows me you as completing I'll paypal you the $10. Thanks.

    10. Re:What is the cost per name to Google? by chesterjosiah · · Score: 1

      I wanted to know your email address to communicate with you better. It's much easier to communicate through email than through slashdot's message board. =) Email me at chester.millisock at gmail dot com

    11. Re:What is the cost per name to Google? by jehnx · · Score: 1

      It doesn't cost 6 dollars per domain. Know your facts before you post, please.

    12. Re:What is the cost per name to Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot your referral sig.

  10. Much better alternative to Verisign by drewzhrodague · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is a much more attractive alternative to Verisign, even over fun names like GoDaddy, and NameBargain.

    Having done ISP work back in the day, I have personally submitted registrations on thousands of domains with the venerable Network Solutions. With Verisign and the recent mix, I have lost tons of my own personal domains I have collected over the years -- and registration on these things is quite expensive! Finally there are alternatives, and I think I would trust Google over Microsoft, Verisign, or the US Government. This is my Internet, and I don't want it fucked-up!

    Also, I think that Google doing root nameserver fun would be more like a DNS cache for them.

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    1. Re:Much better alternative to Verisign by viva_fourier · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, but you have to ask how this fits into their quest to organize the world's information? I naively assume they don't intend to fubar 'your Internet', but this looks a lot like the whole gmail "we store your email forever" sort of deal.

      It seems this registration-scheme would enable them to organize new blogs/sites using their existing network-search framework. And, I can see blogs really taking off in the immediate future. If any of you have used Picasa + Hello + Blogger, you'll know what I mean. Scary Easy.

      Now, you get all sorts of random people posting their thoughts/musings/interests all over -- all being syphoned through Google's keyword-storing architecture. Sergey and Larry are no dummies: they've done their research in data mining. Why stop at data mining the existing information source, when you can create a new one?

      Time to go buy some tinfoil futures...

      --
      and now back to the fallout shelter...
    2. Re:Much better alternative to Verisign by bwy · · Score: 1

      Certainly no disputing that fact that Google has a history of reliability and knowing how to run big... well, okay, really really big systems.

      However, I'm not from the "everything Google does is great" camp. I've advertised with AdWords for the last couple years and I think the interface pretty much sucks. Not completely intuitive and there are lots of usability issues.

      Also, there has been talk of things that happened with google groups, although I'm not sure if they've been reversed but what I saw was hideous. It was "beta" I think- but when you get the beta version via google.com, it might as well have been gold.

      Likewise, gmail isn't universally accepted as the kill-all mail solution.

      Not slamming Google here, overall they're impressive. But, always room for improvement. I hope the recent IPO isn't treated as a mandate to forget about the customer.

    3. Re:Much better alternative to Verisign by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1
      Yes, but you have to ask how this fits into their quest to organize the world's information?
      Perhaps it doesn't. Perhaps it's just a good way for them to capitalise on their brand name. Selling domain names is an automated, machine driven process, something they should be good at. Also they have a wider audience to sell domains to. The average Joe Blogger or Jemima Gmail might otherwise not consider getting a name but if it's offered cheaply the vanity value of it may be worthwhile.
      --
      Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    4. Re:Much better alternative to Verisign by signe · · Score: 1

      This might be an interesting comment, if it was anywhere close to accurate. Google is a registrar, not a registry. Network Solutions is a registrar (and, of course, no longer part of VeriSign). VeriSign is a registry, not a registrar.

      As a customer, you never deal directly with VeriSign anymore. However, the registrar you use does (if it's a com/net/cc/tv/etc. domain that VeriSign is the registry for), whether that's Gandi, GoDaddy, Register.com, or Google. Google isn't going to change that. Every time you register a com/net domain, you pay the registrar you picked, and that registrar pays VeriSign $6/year.

      Additionally, Google being a registrar doesn't mean they're hosting a root nameserver of any sort. In fact, it probably assures they won't, for conflict of interests reasons.

      -Todd

      --
      "The details of my life are quite inconsequential..."
    5. Re:Much better alternative to Verisign by 0x000000 · · Score: 1

      You sir might be interested in their google adwords API which lets you do what you want.

      --
      cat /dev/null > .signature
  11. google movie theater by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    also known as a Googleplex

  12. Lure? by ATAMAH · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is it only me, or does this particular word usage implies something not quite honest? I don't see anything wrong with having a loss leader - a product you may sell at prices below cost in order to gain customers which then can be upsold with other services - hosting and etc.

    1. Re:Lure? by laughingcoyote · · Score: 2, Insightful

      WRONG with that? I love that marketing strategy, because I know about it!

      Company X offers loss leader/free bait. Take loss leader/free bait. Ignore upsell treatment because company Y offers what's being upsold as loss leader/free bait in an attempt to sell you what you're getting cheap/free from company X.

      Rinse, repeat. You'll wind up paying very little or nothing for both sides of the equation.

      I think a lot of people confuse loss-leader marketing (legal and perfectly ethical) with bait-and-switch marketing (illegal and definitely unethical). Loss-leader marketing generally involves offering something offered below cost or for free as a "sample" of a company's offerings, or to familiarize people with the company and upsell them some of their more expensive (and profitable) products/services. As stated above, those who "bargain-hunt" often seek out such offers. This is really no different then a supermarket giving out free samples.

      On the other hand, bait-and-switch is effectively false advertising of something you never intended to offer. When someone asks after the offer, you tell them that that offer is "out of stock" or "no longer available". But we DO have...Or you advertise that "Yes, that's available, but we only offer it bundled with..."

      This type of marketing is considered false advertising, and is unethical and illegal. If you advertise something, you must be willing and able to provide it as advertised. Loss leaders fulfill this requirement, bait-and-switch does not.

      In Google's case, what they are advertising (cheap domain registration, free mail service, etc.) is exactly what they're offering and providing, so they're not doing a thing wrong.

      --
      To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
    2. Re:Lure? by ATAMAH · · Score: 1

      Yup. And how is it different from what i said? Or you weren't trying to argue the point and simply reinforced what i have stated? In case of the latter - i agree.

    3. Re:Lure? by laughingcoyote · · Score: 1

      Effectively reinforcing and clarifying, sorry if I wasn't clear on that.

      --
      To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
  13. Oh praise our metal lord! by Bite-lover · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Oh praise the Metal Lord! I present the one commandment: God needs domain buyers!

    --
    Bite me. Seriously, I enjoy it.
    1. Re:Oh praise our metal lord! by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Where's the "+1 Obscure Futurama Reference" mod when you need it?

    2. Re:Oh praise our metal lord! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's there. You just have to look carefully and click on a few other things first.

    3. Re:Oh praise our metal lord! by Bite-lover · · Score: 1

      I tell ya, just when I need it most it's hiding away with taco in a box under the stairs in the corner of the basement in the house half a block away from Jerry's bait shop.

      --
      Bite me. Seriously, I enjoy it.
  14. No, but Google won't stop you by Nomihn0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Google has a very kind policy when it comes to third-party GMail hacks: They don't care. That is, they don't care at all. Google is permitted to change its structure and/or features at any time without telling a soul, rendering your application/extension obsolete. Google hasn't got the time to go after people using GMail as a personal server, nor do the staff have time to allow them and accept responsibility for their functioning. It's a fair system, in my mind.

    1. Re:No, but Google won't stop you by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      They care, they just havn't acted yet (After all, It's still beta, lets see what people can come up with so we know what we'll need to block when it goes live).

      If you think google doesnt care about hacks on its service, Why is www.google.com/xml IP restricted?
      Why does any request to /search from a useragent with "LWP"(default for a perl script using LibWWW Perl, though configurable) in it get 403?

      Fuck google.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    2. Re:No, but Google won't stop you by Whitehawke · · Score: 1

      They care, they just havn't acted yet (After all, It's still beta, lets see what people can come up with so we know what we'll need to block when it goes live).


      Dude, it's been "beta" for literally years, and it's more stable than a lot of "production" software. It's "beta" in the exact same way that the Debian "testing" branch is unstable software.


      If you think google doesnt care about hacks on its service, Why is www.google.com/xml IP restricted?
      Why does any request to /search from a useragent with "LWP"(default for a perl script using LibWWW Perl, though configurable) in it get 403?


      Well, even though I know I'm feeding the trolls:

      A) Probably because they are developing something at http://www.google.com/xml and they don't want to release it to the world until it's ready.

      B) Because they don't want to be flooded by bots. If you want to have your bot use Google, they give out free SDKs that let you search from a bot as long as you have a key. The search keys are free for up to 1,000 searchs a day; behind that, they ask you to pay a small fee. They aren't doing this to make your life hard, they're doing it to make sure every spammer and script kiddie in existence doesn't flood their service.
    3. Re:No, but Google won't stop you by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      A) Probably because they are developing something at http://www.google.com/xml and they don't want to release it to the world until it's ready.

      I probably should have been more specific. /xml was their xml search results. It works fine and is only ip restricted because google is not open.

      B) Because they don't want to be flooded by bots. If you want to have your bot use Google, they give out free SDKs that let you search from a bot as long as you have a key. The search keys are free for up to 1,000 searchs a day; behind that, they ask you to pay a small fee. They aren't doing this to make your life hard, they're doing it to make sure every spammer and script kiddie in existence doesn't flood their service.

      Thats nice. Find me a method to use their sdk in ~3lines of perl and I might even use it, until then, its impractical. I've even written google parsing scripts in bash before(FWIW, it searched for mirrors to a file by finding links to the same filename, then sent HTTP HEAD requests to each link to sort by file size). Does the google SDK offer bash extentions? (Hint: no.)

      Their SDK is just impractical for small/developing applications.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
  15. How else does it happen? by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

    How else do you think this thing innovation happens, solid business plans? Perhaps in market share, and dollars. What about having a good service that is preferable to whatever else is there? I think that taking wild stabs sometimes does pay off, though I bet they are more general pokings than flailing stabbings. Of course -- we'll see, won't we?

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    1. Re:How else does it happen? by Liveandletlive · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thats right. However, it is usually a good idea to stick to your core competancies. Only a few companies have successfully able to get pieces of different pies. There too most of them did that thru acquisitions.

      --
      I know the world exists because I exist.
  16. Mod parent up by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those of you who missed it... A Googolplex is a 1 with a googol zeros after it.

    1. Re:Mod parent up by HyperChicken · · Score: 1

      For those who missed it, Googolplex has been the name of the movie threater in The Simspons for a long, long time. (Note that it's Googol, not Google)

      --
      Free of Flash! Free of Flash!
    2. Re:Mod parent up by ornil · · Score: 2, Informative

      And also the name of Google's campus

    3. Re:Mod parent up by dapyx · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was used before that

      "And are you not," said Fook leaning anxiously forward, "a greater analyst than the Googleplex Star Thinker in the Seventh Galaxy of Light and Ingenuity which can calculate the trajectory of every single dust particle throughout a five-week Dangrabad Beta sand blizzard?"
      -- Douglas Adams - Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

      --
      I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
  17. Thank you ICANN !! by GamesNET · · Score: 3, Funny

    Great ! Now our domains can get hijacked at newer, bigger registrars! Thank you ICANN !

  18. Re:But, by froggero1 · · Score: 1
    If they offer it as a service (to host out of gmail) then the user would only have to worry about it cutting into thier storage space. Google wouldn't really care, they have a boatload of bandwith anyways. The only thing is that they'd have to be responsible for that data.

    They probably won't allow hosting out of gmail, but I won't be too surprised when they are offering dirt cheap hosting to go with thier dirt cheap domain names. It's all about market share with Google.

    --
    ~/.sig: No such file or directory
  19. the same thing we do every night, larry by chalkoutline · · Score: 1

    Holy christ on a bike, what can they do next? Seriously, I can visualize them offering a Geocities-a-like system or something based on this. yourname.gsite.com ?

    --
    There are 2 types of people in the world, those who find that stupid binary joke funny, and those who don't.
    1. Re:the same thing we do every night, larry by viva_fourier · · Score: 1

      well, if they're already associated with blog-spot, wouldn't yournamehere.gspot.com make more sense?

      --
      and now back to the fallout shelter...
  20. Re:Does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like their newsgroup interface. It's convenient and easy to use.

  21. Abuse of moderation detected by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Parent is not a troll. This is a valid question, and I'd sure like to know what the answer is myself.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Abuse of moderation detected by eln · · Score: 4, Informative

      I suspect the Troll moderation may be due to the freegamingsystems.com link in his sig. There is a great deal of hostility toward the sheer volume of people posting "give me a referral for a free piece of electronics and i'll paypal you x dollars" advertisements all over the Internet.

    2. Re:Abuse of moderation detected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right... Parent gets "-1, Pyramid Scam".

    3. Re:Abuse of moderation detected by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's the equivalent of modding someone's comment down because you think their nickname is stupid. We all know they're pyramid schemes, and it has nothing to do with his comment. When did it become okay to abuse moderation because you think someone is abusing the sig line on /., which is limited to 120 characters to limit the potential abuse? I know that most people don't think this site is valuable, or that moderation is useful and/or important, but I wish those people would go find another site to fuck up.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Abuse of moderation detected by viva_fourier · · Score: 1

      either way, do you think i could use that
      "give me a referral for a free piece of electronics and i'll paypal you x dollars"
      for a sig?
      think of all the laughs it would generate! Ha! Slashdot infamy, here I come! pfffffft.

      --
      and now back to the fallout shelter...
    5. Re:Abuse of moderation detected by mistshadow · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's not actually part of his sig -- it's part of the comment. (turn on "Disable Sigs" in Comment Preferences, and re-load) He just labeled it as "Sig:".

    6. Re:Abuse of moderation detected by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I am aware that it's part of the comment, because it is not after the little "--" that has traditionally signified the beginning of a comment since before I started using net.news or email. It was pretty weird when I started seeing -- twice before my sig because I had put --
      at the head of my sig to put it there myself... Nonetheless it is essentially a sig, and it is labeled as such.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Abuse of moderation detected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir are an idiot, give it up ok?
      That is not a sig. A sig is a signature. A way to show you are you and not some other idiot. There are literally billions of you morons with the CLICK MY LINK GIVE ME FREE THINGS sig. So that pretty much makes it impossible to tell you from the billion other idiots. That fake sig is nothing but a scam and if the slashdot mods had any fucking common decency they would mod ALL posts with those stupid advertising things as troll. Because they are nothing but.

    8. Re:Abuse of moderation detected by MBraynard · · Score: 1
      Hiya, Wow. Lotta comments on my 'sig.' True, it's not in the proper 'sig' location - mostly cause I didn't take the time to do that. I was just making the post because I honest to God wanted to know how much it cost, and though - hey, I should include my referral link at the end.

      I'm sorry it hurt your feelings and angered you so much that you had to see my referral to get a game system. I really don't see what the big deal is. It's not a scam - I got an Ipod from these guys.

      Besides, if you have time to argue so much on /., surely you are in need of $10 for completing an offer.

  22. i for one by viva_fourier · · Score: 0

    I for one, welcome our new www.domain-overlords.net

    --
    and now back to the fallout shelter...
  23. Rent by ari_j · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just wait until they land on the dark blue spaces, baby. I built 11 hotels on Boardwalk and 8 of them on Park Place. One of these times around the board, they're gonna desperately need that $200 from passing Go, because rent on my dark blue properties is $11 billion a hit.

  24. how about certificates? by ch-chuck · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I.e., affordable certificates, give verisign more competition - call 'em gcerts or something.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:how about certificates? by lathama · · Score: 0

      Agreed, and Google should have the bandwidth to answer the requests.

      --
      The GPL, for those that truely understand.
    2. Re:how about certificates? by brutus_007 · · Score: 0
      --
      I have 1 million monkeys on a million year contract to make me a better sig.
    3. Re:how about certificates? by madstork2000 · · Score: 1

      GoDaddy does basic (they call them "turbo") certs now for under $29 a year.

      Of course if you're cheap, you can always self sign a certificate for free.

      -MS2k

    4. Re:how about certificates? by ddent · · Score: 1

      Trouble is for the cert to be any good you have to get your root in the browsers and/or get your root signed by an existing root. I.e. It can't be done overnight.

    5. Re:how about certificates? by rasz · · Score: 0

      - The certificate for "cacert.org" is signed by the unknown Certificate Authority "CA Cert Signing Authority". It is not possible to verify that this is a valid certificate

    6. Re:how about certificates? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Sure it is - it is just as possible to verify as it is to verify that Verisign's root cert is valid.

      CA Cert's certificate is fairly well attested to in general, and can be downloaded from a variety of places. They just haven't ponied up huge wads of cash to get into most browsers' list of trusted root certs.

      There is a war brewing on the mozilla bugzilla about this very topic...

    7. Re:how about certificates? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Apparetly with mozilla it can't be done in 1.5 years unless you have a lot of cash...

    8. Re:how about certificates? by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      IE and Firefox both say, in essence, "WARNING! WARNING! MAY NOT REALLY BE SECURE!" when you enter that site. That's not going to work for any commercial site.

    9. Re:how about certificates? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Agreed - however that is purely a matter of getting the browser maintainers to add their cert to the list of trusted root CAs.

      For MS that might take some time. I would have hoped that Firefox would be more enlightened, but they've been talking about it for 1.5 years now without actually doing much about it...

  25. Ask and you shall receive by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

    Google Calculator

    1. Re:Ask and you shall receive by Nicholas+Hill · · Score: 0

      The genius thing about the calculator is that if you enter the following:

      e^(pi*sqrt(-1))

      You end up with the correct answer of -1, something a lot of calculators cannot do!

      It's quite amazing how two irrational numbers and an imaginary number can come together to equal a small whole number.

  26. Can't wait for the new TLD by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Funny

    I mean, .GOO has so many possibilities in pr0n alone. And nanotech.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:Can't wait for the new TLD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, nanoporn!

  27. Securely Read Your Gmail by Eric+S+Raymond · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Securely read your Gmail - https://gmail.google.com/gmail

    Try doing that with Microsheister hotmale!

    --
    Bypass Compulsory Web Registration -- http://bugmenot.com/
  28. Not so fast by ad0gg · · Score: 1
    People are switching away from google. 2 years ago google had 70% of the search market now they are hovering around 40% . With yahoo at 25% and remaining going to MSN, jeeves etc. With launch of msn new search engine, I can see google's market share going down even more.

    Market Share

    --

    Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    1. Re:Not so fast by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      There are other search engines?
      wow.

      I need to explore more :-)
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    2. Re:Not so fast by amw · · Score: 2, Funny
      There are other search engines?
      Sure there are. Just search for 'Search Engines' on Google.
    3. Re:Not so fast by singleantler · · Score: 1

      That depends how you look at the figures. Google used to provide Yahoo's search results, so the 70% was Google + Yahoo search. When Yahoo went back to doing their own search results Google immediately lost 25% of that 70% - the section represented by Yahoo's results.

      So, Google may have dropped 5%, but it depends how the data was collected, 5% could be their margin for error.

      I was at a meeting with people from five European countries late last year, when they were asked which search engine they used they all said 'Google', when asked the year before it had been a mixture of Yahoo, Lycos and Google. Although a completely non-representative sample, it was interesting to see how Google is still taking over from other engines for some people.

      --
      "What if they're using IE?" "I've dumbed Mozilla down to cope with it." - BOFH
  29. Re:Does by Smidge204 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Last I checked, they aren't becoming a portal. Google search is still Google search.

    However, Google as a company is branching out into related (and sometimes not so related) services. Now that they are publically owned they need to actually make real profits instead of just staying afloat. Becoming a domain registrar seems like a very good way to make money directly instead of relying on advertizing, and at the same time bring in more people to increase the value of their ads and profit that way.

    As for Google Groups "sucking", that's an opinion. I can't really agree or disagree since I don't use it though...

    I don't think anyone really has a problem with a company doing what it can to make a profit, providing that they aren't stabbing others in the back, hoarding patents or copyrights, subverting other industries with bogus standards, using asinine legal threats or trying to push through oppressive laws to do it. (ala RIAA/MPAA/MS/SCO etc)
    =Smidge=

  30. Ask and you shall receive by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 4, Informative

    Google Calculator

  31. yahoo DOES NOT offer $4.98 per domain by xoba · · Score: 5, Informative

    yahoo DOES NOT offer $4.98 per domain --- terms are strictly limited to ONE domain per NEW customer; after that, their $9.95 per domain per year applies:

    "Domains price Offer is open to new customers that purchase Domains. Limit one offer per customer, and one use per customer on a single account. Offer expires February 08, 2005 at 11:59 PM PST. Offers may not be combined with any other offers or discounts, separated, redeemed for cash, or transferred. Other terms and conditions apply; see the Yahoo! Small Business Terms of Service when you sign up."

  32. The real reason they did this is because ... by crispenigl · · Score: 5, Funny

    Google is tired of everyone learning what they are up to via domain name registerations.

    Now, they will be able to register domain names for secret projects, and keep the domain names secret :)

    1. Re:The real reason they did this is because ... by Nik13 · · Score: 1

      Hurry! Grab www.googleworlddomination.com

      --
      ///<sig />
  33. Google OS by serutan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've said it before and I'll say it again here. When Google creates its own Linux distro incorporating Google features into the desktop, that's when Microsoft can put up the sign, "Last one out turn off the lights."

    1. Re:Google OS by HyperChicken · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Just because you say it doesn't make it so.

      --
      Free of Flash! Free of Flash!
  34. Y'know... by CanSpice · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm really enjoying being able to use the Googlenet.

  35. Could be good by digitalgimpus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Google tends to have a good eye for simple interfaces for managing things:

    - Search
    - Gmail
    - Blogger
    - Picasa
    - Google Desktop

    If google carries that tradition forward, I could see myself transfering my domains to them rather them, since they tend to be:

    1. Competitive pricing seems crucial at google. Everything is free or low cost.

    2. Quality

    3. Good support. Google does respond. I had an issue with Google Desktop, and Gmail... both times I got a quick response. Amazingly. I was shocked.

    I can't say the above for any of the major registrar's on the market.

    So if Google expands beyond bloggers and allows domain (especially bulk) registration/transfer.... I'm in.

    1. Re:Could be good by loucura! · · Score: 1

      > Help me get a mini mac!

      How to get a mini mac in five easy steps:

      1.) Earn $500, mowing lawns, singing telegrams, or be a cam whore.
      2.) Go to apple.com or your closest Apple Store.
      3.) Buy said mini mac.
      4.) Wait until it's delivered.
      5.) PROFIT!!

      --
      Black and grey are both shades of white.
  36. Blogging? How about gmail on your own domain? by damieng · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Everybody's speculating on how this could let Google charge a fee for Bloggers to have their own domain name. Bloggers already have an FTP to your own server option so this doesn't add much.

    Surely much more interesting is the concept of Gmail with your own domain name.

    With an administration tool allowing Joe User to setup family and friend create email accounts under your their domain name with Google taking care of all the scanning/filtering/storage.

    Such an option would give them something different to Hotmail and YahooMail to the point of being something worth paying for. Sure some ISP's already offer this but none of the web interfaces I've seen touch GMail.

    That might even explain why it's still in beta...

    --
    [)amien
  37. Pwn3d by renata.org · · Score: 0, Troll

    The whole entire Internet will soon be pwn3d by Google. Be afraid, be VERY afraid.

  38. You get what you pay for by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I bought a domain from someone once who originally bought the name from Yahoo domains. When I tried to get it transferred, I ran into a whole host of problems. The official reply from Yahoo when I tried to contact their technical support staff:

    "Dear valued Yahoo customer,
    We are sorry, but Yahoo is unable to offer technical support for Yahoo domains."

    So I tried calling Melbourne IT (Yahoo resells Melbourne registrations), who of course told me to call Yahoo.

    I wouldn't worry much about Yahoo having competition, tehy seem to be doing a very good job of shooting themselves in the foot anyway.

    --
    bash: rtfm: command not found
    1. Re:You get what you pay for by ddent · · Score: 1

      We've had two customers go through *exactly* what you describe. Quite a pain getting their domain loose for them.

  39. It's getting worrying... by Fleeced · · Score: 0

    I know that most of us love Google - I'm no exception. But I get worried of any company who starts weilding such power... This is very bad news to all the small hosting companies out there - who are probably worried about what hosting plans Google will be offering next (and it is the next logical step). In a few years, we'll be wiping our ass wiith Google toilet paper! (I wonder if it will have adwords on it?)

  40. even bill gates is getting jealous by googisgod · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    maybe the guys at http://www.fuckedgoogle.com/ were right after all?

    i have to admit, I love google, but this is getting sort of ridiculous don't you think?
    what's next- Google silverware and Google cereal?

    1. Re:even bill gates is getting jealous by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ob. Spaceballs ripoff:

      "Google the flamethrower!"

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
  41. Re:But, by easyfrag · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The only thing is that they'd have to be responsible for that data.


    Nah, they'd just stick the word beta in the logo and thats your warning.

  42. .blog by Duncan3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We need to force all blogs onto the .blog domain - then we can just filter out all of them at the DNS.

    Billions of pictures of peoples cats would no longer terrify the world, woohoo!

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    1. Re:.blog by SmoothDime · · Score: 1

      slashdot is a blog. do you not like slashdot?

    2. Re:.blog by damiam · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is not a blog, at least not in the usual sense. A blog is a single person writing about all aspects of their life, whereas /. is multiple people sending in links about technology. /. journals could be seen as blogs, but no one uses them anyway.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    3. Re:.blog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol. Excellent I agree, very funny post.

  43. The Internet is the OS by Infonaut · · Score: 4, Insightful
    When Google creates its own Linux distro incorporating Google features into the desktop, that's when Microsoft can put up the sign, "Last one out turn off the lights."

    I think of it a bit differently. It's not really about the desktop at all. Microsoft was born in the era when the desktop operating system ruled. But Google was born in the Internet Era, and it shows in their strategy. Their goal seems to be to develop a wide array of applications that live on the Internet, thereby obviating the need for a desktop monopoly. If everything is on the Net, who really cares what OS you're using?

    Microsoft comes at it from the opposite direction, attempting to extend their desktop operating system to the Internet. But the Achilles Heel of this strategy is backward compatibility. Microsoft has to support its legacy operating systems, and no matter what they do to attempt to take over the Internet, they can't adequately leverage their desktop OS monopoly because they have to first convince people that it's worth the money to upgrade to gain the benefits of the Microsoft Internet.

    Google is constantly improving their applications and they don't have to worry about legacy operating system issues. They can simply piggyback off of Internet standards and when they do push into the OS, they're leveraging Microsoft's immense investment in Windows. It doesn't really matter whether Linux, Windows, or the Mac is dominant, as far as Google is concerned. As long as no one is able to box them out by controlling access to the Web, Google is limited only by their ability to deliver great web apps.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:The Internet is the OS by fupeg · · Score: 1

      Ok, but what about stuff like Desktop Search and Picasa? You can run both of these without an internet connection, though they both have some web integration parts (that are very similar to how Microsoft integrates its legacy apps with the web.)

      I think Google's strategy is to NOT have a clear strategy. They seem much more interested in developing technology just because it is interesting to somebody. There is definitely a bit of the dot-com arrogance with them, i.e. the notion that they can come up with a cool technology and then later find a business model for it. Look at how many of things are still in "Beta" for Google! A lot of these beta things are guilty of not having a business model behind them.

      Personally I think it's great: GMail is all I use for email (except for having to use Outlook at work) and Picasa is one of the best Windows apps out there IMO. I think their Desktop Search could use a lot of work, but that's another topic... I can't help but think it would be funny to see some of their hubris backfire on them though.

    2. Re:The Internet is the OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a neat way to look it. Of course, the problem is that Microsoft probably sees the same potential which is why they'll do whatever they can to head Google off in as many ways as they can. If every time google comes up with some new, cool internet app, Microsoft makes one that is only half as cool but comes bundled with the OS, many many people will use the Microsoft tool. Illegal as it may be for Microsoft to use their monopoly that way it's not like they haven't done it before....

  44. required comment? by mreed911 · · Score: 2, Funny

    all your domain are belong to us

  45. Jew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still waiting for them to change the disclaimer for when you search for Jew.

    Quote:
    Offensive Search Results
    www.google.com/explanation We're disturbed about these results as well. Please read our note here.


    It use to be that when you searched for Jew you would get anti-semitism. However several people managed to raise their Jewish results making Google's disclaimer obsolete.
    I sent a comment to Google's customer service and they responded by telling me that I had the wrong department with no reference to who I should contact.
    Go figure.

    1. Re:Jew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh My God. I didn't realise they had stuck a disclaimer on it. Man that is a slippery slope. Offensive or not they should just leave it as it is.

      Unfortunately Google has always been subject to caving in to external groups. Who remembers the Co$ fiasco?

      This is one reason why Google needs some competition from fresh sources. They are not capable of delivering credible unbiased results anymore and instead need to apologize about their own results.

    2. Re:Jew by donothingsuccessfull · · Score: 1

      From jewwatch.com:
      JEW WATCH FEATURE: IS POPE JOHN-PAUL II JEWISH?

      Now I'm wondering if bears actually suck up shit into their arse when they're in the woods?

  46. Google cookie by delta_avi_delta · · Score: 1

    Assuming the idea is to allow Joe User to setup a home email & website all via google, would it be possible to leverage the infamous google cookie? Since the cookie would already provide information on how said Joe User searches, could tracking him back to his homepage provide solid, real-life demographics (45% of Joe's who like beer have a family page etc...) Could this be where they're going with this?

    1. Re:Google cookie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Different domains cannot share cookies (browser bugs withstanding)

  47. relief - horror avoided by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    imagine bloogle

  48. GoogleOS by Niosis · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Man, I wonder when googleOS is going to be released. I'm ready for it.

  49. domain registrar + dark-fibre = ? by cosmic_0x526179 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... perhaps a new entry in the hosting market. After all, they do have a deep understanding of distributing content around the world. It also makes it somewhat easier for them to crawl the content of said servers.

    --
    This msg is brought to you by the letter 'W'.. for Worthless Wuss
  50. Re:Stupid Goddamned Mods! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 0

    They need to actually have a bar.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  51. Good News... by MrChester · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Personally, I think google's controlling all these different things is great. They have delivered on almost every single thing they've attempted. They combine power and simplicity in a way everyone loves, and maybe when most of your services are through google, they can link some things together (with appropiate security though) if google ever becomes corrupt then we can just move on

    1. Re:Good News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I think google's controlling all these different things is great. ... if google ever becomes corrupt then we can just move on

      Yeah, just like the world moved on from Microsoft.

    2. Re:Good News... by MrChester · · Score: 1

      google can be replaced easily though... as soon as they screw up, we can change... but as with microsoft, we have a lot invested into it, we can switch so easily, and linux isn't near as good as a competitor as windows, face it. its a niche market, but as with search engines u can switch with no problems

  52. when looking for companies these days by Pivot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I often find myself writing the company name in the google search field than trying to find a randomly similar url. I think having specific domain names is loosing its importance these days because the namespace is so highly utilized.

  53. Headline from the Slashdot Future by celeritas_2 · · Score: 1

    Why Google is the new Microsoft: How a great thing turns evil.

    --
    -- Checking emails and kicking cheats `till the day I die.
  54. MOD PARENT UP (INSIGHTFUL)!! by Seoulstriker · · Score: 1

    The parent post sums up Google's strategy for future growth fairly well I think. Mod parent up!

    --
    I am defenseless. Use your button. Mod me down with all of your hatred.
  55. Re:Stupid Goddamned Mods! by allokotos · · Score: 0

    I think it was because the parent repeated what was in the actual article summary...

    Just a hunch.

  56. Re:Stupid Goddamned Mods! by B3ryllium · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Most of the people who could be considered "experienced" moderators have a tendency to disable mod points in their preferences.

    So, rather than having a bar for minimum skill level when moderating, slashdot actually seems to have a bar for MAXIMUM skill level.

  57. Stupid Goddamned Mods! by eomnimedia · · Score: 0, Redundant

    How the hell can the first post of a topic be...oh wait.

  58. Re:Does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How are they not becoming a portal? They are doing EVERYTHING that other popular portals do/did.

  59. Thats not the point... by yoshi_mon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you want to get into abuse of a system then I think the argument can be made that since the parent post in question added the sig in to the body of the comment it is no longer a sig in the proper sense. A proper sig can be disabled as was noted. Who's abusing what here?

    Since there is already a system built to try and prevent moderation abuse, meta-moderation, and none to prevent anyone from posting their sig in the body of a comment I would suggest that the abuse here was made by the sig rather than the moderation.

    --

    Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
  60. Nope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's when Microsoft will start using their IP portfolio to sue the crap out of Google for infringement on the OS patents.

  61. Re:Blogging? How about gmail on your own domain? by HybridJeff · · Score: 1

    Thats kind of what Im doing right now. Ive got an email server at my domain that just forawards evreythign to gmail, and gmail just labels evreything I send out as having been sent from said email address (well the reply to anyways).

  62. gmail @ myowndomain by frapas · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's clear that google will sell domain name powered by gmail accounts. So registering yourfavouritenamehere.com with google you will get @yourfavouritenamehere.com mail addresses trasparently usable through gmail webmail.

  63. The imperative to decertify Verisign. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    One of the most important changes that must take place for the Internet to stay healthy is the decertification of Verisign as the .COM administrator.

    Google has proven that it knows how to deliver reliable services to the Internet, and has proven that it's a reasonably responsible company. Hopefully, Google's current move can position it to eventually take Verisign's place in the future.

  64. Re:Does by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

    This is a web portal.

    This is not a web portal.

    Despite the growing collection of features Google offers, they sure do a good job of not becoming a portal.
    =Smidge=

  65. Anyone Notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How Google is actually starting to miss stuff posted to the web? Is it robots.txt or other mechanisms keeping Google out.

    No real statistics just seems like searches that turned up a ton of hits previously now only turn up a few. And no not Pr0n, but techie stuff.

    -sdfx

  66. Crowded URL Namespace by antinoous · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When the URL namespace gets crowded, a good search engine is the answer. The more people register domain names, the more they need to use a search engine to disambiguate the various URLs that may or may not correspond to what they're looking for. Providing cheap domain registration will lead more people to use Google to search for a particular website rather than attempting to remember a URL.

  67. future.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    perhaps in the future google will have explanded their services to encompass most of what users need; and then begin offering affordible high speed internet access to those services...
    and perhaps a mystical new internet that google runs themselves which eventually becomes more popular than our current one; I don't suppose I'd mind the change. Either the new one sucks and all the script kiddies go to it - thus speeding up the current internet greatly, or I get cheap, quick internet access.

    and perhaps google will become a company that makes only chairs. Or spontaniously explodes sending forth horrible acid.

  68. Re:Does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What distinguished portal from non-portal? Just because Google's website isn't as busy and cluttered as Yahoo's doesn't mean it isn't a portal.

    Let's examine. You go to the web. What do you do? You search, read news, read newsgroups, read email. So any portal needs to have these features. Hey! That exactly matches Google's website.

    Google is a portal.

  69. Google and Web hosting by carl0ski · · Score: 1

    I can see very soon they will implement the so called Exploit that is Gmail Drive (use you 1gig free email space , as a shared webhosting service. you may use a portion Max 50% to upload you website to :)

  70. Anyone see where this is going? by Transcendent · · Score: 1

    Eventually Google will be the all powerful conglomeration that is taking over the world, and we will soon hate them for their (in the future) e-mail system that can't get out of beta, search results that aren't unique anymore and some other innovation surpassed them, slow updates for the registrar, pressing it's might into all standards and gobbling up patents, etc...

    C'mon google... keep it simple. I don't want to have to start hating you...

  71. gstring by rakiner · · Score: 1

    It looks like the final pieces of google's plans to take over gstring.com and start a google thong website are finally falling into place.

  72. You fail it by Suhas · · Score: 1

    ...Bzzzzzt busted. The name of Google's headquarters is NOT GoogolPlex. It is GooglePlex

  73. How to registar a domain via Google by adeydas · · Score: 1

    Enter your domain, hit RETURN
    Enter your name and company, hit RETURN
    Add pops up, says "Wishing to registar a domain for your new car services, go to cardomains.com...

    And *Poof*, there goes Google's market.

  74. what about GoDaddy's superbowl advert? by elhoratioco · · Score: 1

    heh, this could take away the hype from Go Daddy's superbowl a commercial.

    http://www.godaddy.com/gdshop/superbowl05/landin g. asp

  75. great, now there is food on my monitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hillarious, props.

    1. Re:great, now there is food on my monitor by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I'll be here all week! Try the chicken, and don't forget to tip your waitress.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  76. Re:Blogging? How about gmail on your own domain? by adpowers · · Score: 1

    I had this idea a few months ago, but I wasn't expecting Google to become a registrar. For the average user, buying a domain and pointing the MX entries at Google would be a lot of work. It looks even more plausible now, because Google would tie it all together really nicely and make it very simple to sign up. If you don't want @gmail, you type in your own domain, buy it, and Google handles the DNS as well as everything else. It's perfect!

    Good point about it being Beta still. It is very stable, so people wonder why that is. Perhaps this is one of the final features before initial release. They might also implement a non-Javascript version.

  77. MOD PARENT UP by VeneficusAcerbus · · Score: 1

    While most people don't like to hear that, it is true.

  78. World domination? by JoeInParis · · Score: 1

    World Domain-ation, rather. Peace, joe

  79. cheap domains by Exter-C · · Score: 1

    There is so much congestion in that market. Although google could easily get a great deal of business through that it would be one of those things that could in the future come and bite them...

    but i would buy a domain from google if it was auto submitted into their search engine etc free or for a nominal life time fee..

  80. new robots.txt for google-registered domains? by Q-Kumbers · · Score: 1
    User-agent: *
    Disallow: /
    User-agent: Googlebot
    Disallow:

    I'm just being paraniod. I hope. :)

    1. Re:new robots.txt for google-registered domains? by blorg · · Score: 1

      I'm just being paraniod. I hope. :)

      Given that DNS has nothing whatsoever to do with robots.txt, yes, you are.

  81. Or is that World Domain-ation? by camcloud1 · · Score: 0

    Either way I find it annoying that EVERYTHING new that Google gets involved is considered to be their attempt at World Domination. This is purely a /. reaction to Microsofts business dealings in the IT world. Just because Google are expanding their business model to incorporate other internet related ventures apart from search engines does not necessarily mean they are "doing a Microsoft".

  82. Last I checked... by vikramrn · · Score: 1

    [..] You search, read news, read newsgroups, read email [..]

    Last I checked, the Google Homepage did not have a link to Gmail...

  83. They wouldn't need to become a registrar... by blorg · · Score: 1

    ...to offer "yourname.gsite.com" - you have full control over your own third-level
    names without having to do this. They would have become a registrar so that they can sell "yourname.com" to people.

    1. Re:They wouldn't need to become a registrar... by chalkoutline · · Score: 1

      I meant they'd offer a free webspace deal with that domain, as well as yoursite.com.

      --
      There are 2 types of people in the world, those who find that stupid binary joke funny, and those who don't.
  84. Re:Does by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

    Reasons why I don't consider it a portal:

    No user account. Not that you'ld actually need one, but there isn't even an opportunity to have one. Part of what I consider a "portal" website is the ability to customize to a high degree what I want to show up on the main page when I visit.

    Primary use of Google is a search tool. Portals, for me, tend to be more about central content delivery and "oh yeah, we have a search box too!". Even Google News is a search. Yahoo has their own news system, Google gives you news from other sources. About the only services they offer that aren't searches are Alerts, Blogger, Keyhole and the translation page.

    No weather reports.

    No online shopping. Froogle does not count since you're not buying anything from Google directly, it's a search tool.

    No classified ad service.

    It's missing a lot of things I normally think of when someone says "web portal". It's a "swiss army knife" of search tools.
    =Smidge=

  85. ev1 does.. by slashmojo · · Score: 1
    ev1servers.net aka rackshack offer cheap domains and certs already..

    They are just resellers but I think they sell at a loss or at least at cost price to bring in the server clients.

  86. what next by lposeidon · · Score: 0

    google making computers? or toasters?

    --
    Lizard "Never let them set limits on your mind!"
  87. They probably just want to guard their own domains by rtz · · Score: 1

    google becoming a registrar doesn't have to mean anything at all, really. There's a trend where big companies become registrars just get more control over their own domains. This let's them have a tighter hold than if they have to rely on a third party to stop hijackings etc.

    To a big corporation the cost of becoming a registrar is nothing, at least when you compare it to the cost of having your domain hijacked and off-line (or worse, used for phishing etc) for several days. Just look at the Panix debacle, where a big UK ISP had their domain hi-jacked for more than a weekend.

    Article 1
    Article 2

  88. so whats googles domain biz name? by newker · · Score: 1

    if google have gmail for mail then gdomain for domain? well its all been taken up except for .org

    --
    anything is made affordable...
  89. Google. by FreeUser · · Score: 1

    In a few years you'll be driving your google to the google to buy some google for your google.

    I come from google. In our language we can express any thought with a single word. Indeed, our language only has one word: google.

    The above, translated into google:

    Google. Google. Google.

    (With fond memories of my visit to Marklar)

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  90. Free Advertising by Jason+O'Neil · · Score: 1

    If you register a domain with google, does it automatically give you free advertising through their search pages?

  91. attn: Google: New 'Usenet/Google Groups' Bites by Mana+Mana · · Score: 1
    As for Google Groups "sucking" ...

    I will ditto that sentiment, strongly! As Google folk will no doubt be reading the feedback.

    Since the netnews service revamp a few months back, I keep thinking and cursing: Gad! This is a f_ck_ng improvement?! They are tone deaf on this one. Bring the old iteration back, please. I have fa.linux.kernel and more to read.

  92. Re:Stupid Goddamned Mods! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why do you think people would disable mod points? Just to avoid losing karma to metamod? That doesn't seem like a big enough justification to avoid moderating. That defeats the whole point of the moderation system.

  93. misleading article by g0dsp33d · · Score: 1

    A CNET article says that Google "has no plans to sell Web addressees for now.

    "Google became a domain name registrar to learn more about the Internet's domain name system," a company representative said Tuesday. "We believe this information can help us increase the quality of our search results."

    According to the article its just about their search feature so far. More to come?

    --
    lol: You see no door there!