Slashdot Mirror


Australia Gets 8Mbit/s Broadband now, 20Mbit Soon

danwarne writes "Whirlpool is reporting the 'bad old days' of slow, expensive broadband in Australia might be over, with the large ISP iiNet unveiling broadband internet up to 8Mbit/s, from $29/mth. It has been installing its own DSLAMs into the exchanges of Australia's incumbent telco, Telstra, which limits internet access speeds to a maximum of 1.5MBit/s. iiNet boss Michael Malone says as soon as the ADSL2+ standard is approved for use in Australia (which should be in a month or two), he intends to switch the DSLAMs over to offering 20Mbit/s speeds. It looks like Telstra and Optus, the two incumbent telcos in Australia might have their duopoly on high speed broadband (10Mbit/s cable internet) challenged, with potentially great ramifications for price competition in Australia. The only downside noted by Whirlpool readers is that iiNet is forcing customers to take their long distance phone service as well to get access to the 8Mbit/s speeds, a move which is ironically reminiscent of the tactics used by Telstra and Optus."

407 comments

  1. Michael is gone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Please note that Michael has been sacked. Hopefully, those responsible for the sacking will not be sacked.

    This has been a brief public service announcement. Thank you for your attention.

    1. Re:Michael is gone! by Gob+Blesh+It · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wow, is this for real? Michael is gone from the list of Slashdot editors (here's a Google cache from this morning). And he doesn't seem to have posted anything today either.

      Michael's departure, if true, would be the best thing to happen to Slashdot in a long time... and I've got two karma points to burn for saying so.

      Anyone got the sordid details?

    2. Re:Michael is gone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice troll...

    3. Re:Michael is gone! by skurk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Heck, I might as well burn some points as well:

      Michael's departure, if true, would be the best thing to happen to Slashdot in a long time... and I've got two karma points to burn for saying so.

      I've been reading slashdot for a few years, but have no preferences amongst the editors. I've never noticed anything negative about Michael.. However I have noticed the frequent "MICHAEL SUXX!" posts from a bunch of AC's.

      Why do people dislike him so much?
      Can someone please enlighten me?

      --
      www.6502asm.com - Code 6502 assembly or.. DIE!!
    4. Re:Michael is gone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your welcome

    5. Re:Michael is gone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here's a nice summary of michael's editorial failings. Also, don't miss this description of his general douchebaggery. His comment tacked onto the end of this story was probably the last straw; search the comments for "michael".

    6. Re:Michael is gone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Anyone got the sordid details?

      Not me. But I have noticed something.

      Quite recently, slashdot started up some kind of partnership with speakeasy.

      On August 28, 2003, michael used five slashdot story tags to b*tch about speakeasy.

      maybe there is some connection there...

    7. Re:Michael is gone! by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Michael... is that you?

    8. Re:Michael is gone! by gbjbaanb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      that comment was inflammatory and highly biased, and these comments just show up the partisan nature of the /. crowd nowadays - a crowd that is persuaded into thinking a certain way by the editors in the items they choose to accept, and the way they present them.

      If Fox news (say) comes out with something equally as biased (eg. some company didn't get good support with open source, well what do you expect from a bunch of commie hippies who make it in their spare time) then /. would attack them. If /. says the opposite, but equally poor reporting, then its acceptable.

      The /. editors may be editors and not journalists, but they force the direction this site goes in, and as we see, there are too many kiddies and 'me too' posters that give the usual knee-jerk posts in a way that is cozy, safe and un-thinking in the knowledge that they'll get karma points (read: accolation from their peers) and the sense of community from similarly mindless readers here.

      That's a bad place to be - like an isolated community who only respects each other, and their shared, insular values. If you want this site to be respected by others, especially people from the real world who might just use OSS for real business purposes, then you want to give a more thoughtful, even-handed feel to the posts here. Where accuracy of posts (and especially articles) are more important than simply knocking anything that isn't free or open, especially snide comments like Michael's (who is, after all, a 'leader' here and thus expected to show better qualities in his comments)

      Anyway, that rant was brought to you by the words fairness and open-mindedness, and not bloody-minded arrogant knee-jerk post about a post that someone else posted that I disagreed with. ;)

    9. Re:Michael is gone! by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      Secondly, he is/was an EDITOR. That means he gets to EDITORIALISE stories as well as choose them. Please look up the job description of editor for various forms of media, and learn a little.

      Slashdot "editors" are not like traditional newspaper editors. They're more like posting approvers. If they were real editors they would proofread posts and ensure there are no spelling or grammatical errors before posting them to the frontpage.

    10. Re:Michael is gone! by Hypr · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      This needs to be rated "Funny" as well for the unnoticed Monty Python and the Holy Grail reference.

      --
      Maturity will come when it's good and ready.
    11. Re:Michael is gone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His welcome what?

    12. Re:Michael is gone! by takeya · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      ... he's back on the mod list. wonder what he did to get back on, now that there's been ample evidence provided as to why he'd been sacked.

    13. Re:Michael is gone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My welcome?

    14. Re:Michael is gone! by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Does this mean I'll be un-blacklisted from moderating now?

      I've been posting here almost every weekday for three or four years. My karma has been consistently "Excellent". My "Willing to Moderate" box is checked, and I Meta-Moderate every time the chance is offered to me.

      And yet, I haven't been given any mod points to spend in at least a year, probably more. The odds are against this being mere coincidence.

    15. Re:Michael is gone! by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      To add, look at this article (yes, I was the submiter, I know) and the original posting below by me (yes, I am pissed at what he did). Completely re-writing story submisions and adding in claims without proof is not what an editor does, not even a /. editor.

      And if anyone asks what I would do if I was an editor, "I would not change a submited story (except for spelling mistakes) even if I didn't agree with it." I might not post it if there were factual errors about the article (such as with the MGM DVDs a few days ago), but as long as the summary is correct I would post it if it was newsworthy.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  2. capped to 5GB/month by ZeekWatson · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Too bad the caps are suitable for a 56k line though. :(

    1. Re:capped to 5GB/month by phantasma6 · · Score: 1

      They're are actually capped to 40GB per a month.

    2. Re:capped to 5GB/month by Ark42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      5GB/month speed is about equal to 16kbit/sec speed.
      Wow thats slow.

    3. Re:capped to 5GB/month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, it is not unlimited high speed internet :(

    4. Re:capped to 5GB/month by SlightOverdose · · Score: 2, Informative

      The largest plan is 80gb/month.

      iiNet usually upgrade the plans every 3 months or so, and the quota is quite often doubled each time.

    5. Re:capped to 5GB/month by carm$y$ · · Score: 0, Troll

      Question is, can the kangaroos read that fast?

      --
      -- No sig today
    6. Re:capped to 5GB/month by Kris_J · · Score: 1
      Mod parent up.

      I'm with iiNet on one of their old 256/128 plans. I get 12 Gig peak, 12 Gig off peak for A$49.95 a month. That same price gets 1 Gig peak, 1 Gig off peak. I think I'll wait for the quotas to move to something sensible before I switch.

    7. Re:capped to 5GB/month by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Since here I can get 20 Mb ADSL for 20 / month, uncapped. I think I won't move just yet then...

      Plus free national phone calls through the ADSL router (which also gives me an extra phone #), and access to a few TV channels, or a lot through subscription. TV eats into the bandwidth though since it is delivered through VLC.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    8. Re:capped to 5GB/month by Viper233 · · Score: 1

      Currently I'm with one iinet's of sister companies, ihug, subscribed to their satellite feed, for $99AU a month with a 5GB (1GB 6am-6pm Peek, 4GB 6pm-6am Off-peak) limit. ADSL2 would be great but unfortunately I'm in an unprofitable demagraphic... my exchange is ready to go, just no one wants to plug in an ADSL modem for a population of >3000.. looks

    9. Re:capped to 5GB/month by Spacejock · · Score: 1

      Unless you have a business account (which I need solely for the fixed IP address) Then you pay $105 p/m for 512/128 and a 2gb/month cap. I've watched the iiNet home plans soaring over the past 2 years, but have the business plans improved? Not really... The plan I'm on has been replaced with a $149/m 40gb/m 512/128 one. For me to upgrade to a faster speed, I'm looking at $199 per month. Nuts to that.

      An equivalent home plan without fixed IP looks like it's about fifty bucks a month. I'm not complaining - companies are entitled to charge what they can get away with, but a little bit of evening up on the business accounts wouldn't hurt.

      Disclosure: I have shares in iiNet, and if they're charging other business customers like they they charge me, I'm keeping them...

    10. Re:capped to 5GB/month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does slashdot keep reporting about slow broadband providers in the uk, australia etc? In Sweden these speeds are not very much to raise an eyebrow over. These speeds are the lowest ones you can get, today 20-100 mbit is what companies now provide. Personally I've got 8/1 and that's the slowest line between all my friends, they have 10/10 all of them, except for a few with 100/100.

      Unless the posters know about this, we'll probably be bloated with even more boring 'news' about 'high speed broadband' in development contries...

      Come on. It's simply pathetic imperialistic ignorance.

    11. Re:capped to 5GB/month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a massive leap in speed here in Australia, and given that most Aussie geeks read Slashdot, it's newsworthy. There was no intention of saying that we are better than anyone else, but rather that we are finally getting decent speeds.

    12. Re:capped to 5GB/month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't consider this newsworthy. If you get better speeds than before, then fine, but do you need to write it on the web? It's like, the milk got cheaper in russia, let's post it on slashdot..

      No, it's not newsworthy for the rest of us, and definately not for sharing on slashdot. Let's keep up with fun/interesting news about science and stuff..

      Or is this the start of something new? A new slashdot section 'broadband' lol..

    13. Re:capped to 5GB/month by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Why is this a Troll? Our roos are quite intelligent, shown by the fact they can read at all.

    14. Re:capped to 5GB/month by Biomechanical · · Score: 1
      Unless you have a business account (which I need solely for the fixed IP address) Then you pay $105 p/m for 512/128 and a 2gb/month cap. I've watched the iiNet home plans soaring over the past 2 years, but have the business plans improved? Not really... The plan I'm on has been replaced with a $149/m 40gb/m 512/128 one. For me to upgrade to a faster speed, I'm looking at $199 per month. Nuts to that.

      And because you pay that amount of money for that 512/128 connection, they'll keep on charging you for it for as long as possible - My local ISP charges $79.95 for a similar plan (512/128, static IP, unlimited dowload).

      I pay AU$160.00 per month for an Unlimited 512/512 connection with a static IP address. And yes, I've tested it's "unlimited" status. >:)

      That's at one ISP, and if you look at the Broadband Choice site on Whirlpool, you'll find several ISP's who offer similar plans.

      Stop paying too much and help the rest of us DSL customers in Australia push the prices down.

      --
      His name is Robert Paulsen...
    15. Re:capped to 5GB/month by Spacejock · · Score: 1

      I've got a subdomain. I'm shifting stuff off it, but it's linked from a few places and it'd be a problem to drop it.

    16. Re:capped to 5GB/month by stoborrobots · · Score: 1

      Which exchange? If there's enough interest, consider setting up a community-based DSL provider...

      http://www.bendigotelco.com.au/
      http://www.ncable.net.au/

      (Or else let me know, and I'll see about becoming a "community player" by "enhancing the outback's access to high-speed internet...")

    17. Re:capped to 5GB/month by edwazere · · Score: 1

      if you can get that kind of bandwidth, then why does the front page of your website say
      "This site is hosted at home on a 512/128KiBit/s line. It might be slow if there is lots of traffic. Sorry about that."?

      Much confusion.

      --
      -- You ain't seen me, right?
    18. Re:capped to 5GB/month by Doogzee · · Score: 1

      Maybe it has something to do with the fact that Australians don't live in Sweden? It may surprise you, but broadband growth has been at different paces all throughout the world.
      The fact that this is slow compared to Sweden does not bother me in the slightest, because I don't live in Sweden.

    19. Re:capped to 5GB/month by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      It says so because I didn't switch to that provider. :)
      Although I'm considering it now that the early deployment bugs have apparently been ironed out.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  3. That might sound fine by Exter-C · · Score: 5, Informative

    That might sound fine but in reality there is not enough bandwidth in the IINET network to handle even 100 of these connections at full speed let alone having thousands of users. The price per port for the IP ports (Oc12 or whatever) is still way to expensive to be able to cover the costs in any sort of reasonable time frame.

    1. Re:That might sound fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhm... you know this how?

    2. Re:That might sound fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you know this by magickal dancing faery fish that secretly fly into the iinet network rooms and have cisco certification?

    3. Re:That might sound fine by smurf1974 · · Score: 1

      There may not be enough bandwidth if everybody maxes out their line all the time with eg. p2p. But in reality bandwidth is much like cpu power. 95% of the time you are only using a fraction of it, but it is nice to have when you need the extra power.

    4. Re:That might sound fine by ender81b · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hate to break it to you but that's how most ISP's work. Very, very, very rarely do you have more than 5% of your theoretical max bandwith available. IE if you have 1000 DSL customers all at 1.5/384 you can easily get away with having a single DS-3. Very few people (even geeks) use their connections at max bandwith for more than a few minutes a day.

      Part of this of course (it's not like ISP's don't want more bandwidth) is the enormous costs of DS-3/OC-3 etc lines. While a 1.5/384 or 8/1megabit, etc line might run the customer $40 a month a single DS-3 in my neck of the woods (even if you are on the fiber loop and they don't have to charge you per mile runs) will easily run > $8,000 dollars a month depending on your service agreements, etc.

    5. Re:That might sound fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Australia, Telstra offers unmetered 10Mb connection for about AU$10,000per month

    6. Re:That might sound fine by ender81b · · Score: 1

      sweet jesus that's expensive. For that much you could get a full DS-3 and a fractional here in the states, well at least across most of the midwest.

    7. Re:That might sound fine by Exter-C · · Score: 1

      Telstra isnt the only provider. PowerTEL, Optus, Connect.com (AAPT) are all much cheaper than the leading monopoly telco. You can easily cut the telstra quote down to about 25% or less if you shop around for point to point ethernet unmetered.

      If you have your own sxc connection you can also reduce your international transit costs significantly.

      Plus even if you do use telstra as your upstream provider when your buying more than 155mbps the cost is massivly cheaper. The more you buy the cheaper it gets and the more bargaining power you get. I used to network engineer a national ISP in aus so I know how it works.

    8. Re:That might sound fine by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Which is why I'm suprised no provider in the US has realised that they could provide better service and get free advertising by allowing unmetered transfer between its own customers.
      I use roadrunner in austin, If I wanted to send a file to someone else in austin, it goes at my normal upstream cap of 50kB/s. If I could get a good 500Kb/s or so, they arnt really hurting (The line to my house is easily capable of it, and if it never leaves roadrunners edge, they arn't paying for it..). And then the free advertising kicks in. If your local isp becomes essentially a giant lan thats able to route packets out, wouldnt you be more likely to get your friends to use the same service?

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    9. Re:That might sound fine by thogard · · Score: 1

      You can get a single megabit for under $700 and if your looking for more than 10, you can get it for AU$200/megabit.

      Telstras list price (as of last week) was still $18,000/mo.

      I can get cheaper access in New Zealand than in Australia but all that is back hauled to Sydney before it hits the US so I don't buy into the expensive international transit. Besides most of the pacific links are far from capacity and the capacity goes up every year.

      What I've noticed is bandwidth to smaller users is increasing in price in Australia.

    10. Re:That might sound fine by ender81b · · Score: 2, Informative


      I think the problem is that the system you described is it would be hard to implement. Currently, for both Cable and DSL, the circuits are provisioned at a set speed - at the DSLAM (for DSL) and at the Cable Modem for Cable. For your system to work you'd have to allow whatever provisioning you'd want at the DSLAM or Cable modem (whatever, 10mbps/6 mbps) and then run QoS controls on a router to traffic shape everything else. This would cost more - you'd have to invest in some beefier routers - and be harder to configure. You'd also run into the problem of what you consider local - is anybody in the state? The country?

      Remember, most DSLAMS (and CTSMS for that matter) serve only a few hundred customers then are linked together by DS3's and what have you. It'd also be alot harder to ensure the right speed, Cable has a finite upload bandwith and two/three people on the same CTSM who were xferring gigs upon gigs of bandwith could kill a node. Same with DSL, though to a lesser extent.

      It wouldn't be impossible, but you'd have to essentially redesign the entire system to make it work. Currently though most "tier 1" providers implement kindof the system you describe. For instance, one of our DS3's is through Sprint and any bandwith that stays on Sprint's network isn't counted against our Xfer costs.

    11. Re:That might sound fine by swherdman · · Score: 1

      I was at a camp recentley (3-4 weeks ago) and we had a talk from the guy who was head of ACS (Australianb computer society) and he was basicaly saying that Australia's current internet connections are crap and that what you really need these days is speed >10 and as even as high as 20. i dont know if this was exaduration or not but thats what he said. They have apprantley been baduraging the Australian goverment to upgrade such things. Few people know that they played a major role in implemention of the now strong stance on the use of camera phones. Fiber is the way of communications. My science knowledge is limited on new developments but as far as i know the speed of light is the fastest speed possable. If so lets just start lying as much fiber down as possable all over the place. the lines themself's i dont think would change that much just the way we send information along the lines. I think i can rember reading on here somewhere that scientsts are been able to get 100gb a sec over fiber lines or something with new tcp/ip standards

    12. Re:That might sound fine by lovswr · · Score: 1

      ender81b what part of the world would that be? I work for a large (we are in the top 5) telecommunications provider in North America. We recently negotiated a 24 month contract for several Oc-192's. The per Oc-3 trib cost is less than 1000 USD per month. Even when we have to buy "on the spot" circuits in the Asia Pacific region 8000 USD/month for just a DS-3 is just too much.

    13. Re:That might sound fine by aminorex · · Score: 1

      That is freakin' amazing. Roadrunner caps you
      at a lower bitrate than you could get from a
      freakin' analog modem. Forget that crap, and get
      another phone line.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    14. Re:That might sound fine by gid · · Score: 1

      that's kilobytes, not kilobits. I have road runner and I get around 45-50 KiB/s (kilobytes/sec) upload, or 400 Kibit/s (kilobits/sec)--many times what a modem can do.

      I wish everyone would just use the standard to end the confusion. Sure the standard is a little weird, but tough bananas.

    15. Re:That might sound fine by ender81b · · Score: 1

      Nebraska, United States

      Shit, a T-1 here will run you $1000 a month. OC-3 runs at $12,000 irrc here if you are on the fiber loop, otherwise they charge per mile fees.

  4. Nice, now when are the RIMs going? by Aurix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I just wish there'd be more of a focus on extending ADSL coverage across Australia. I mean seriously, how much longer must we be on prehistoric RIMs and the like?

    1. Re:Nice, now when are the RIMs going? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, all the talk about ADSL2+ and I can' even get ADSL-1 !

    2. Re:Nice, now when are the RIMs going? by swordfishBob · · Score: 1

      Whirlpool has a current article on that too..
      http://whirlpool.net.au/article.cfm/1432

      --
      -- All your bass are below two Hz
    3. Re:Nice, now when are the RIMs going? by Aurix · · Score: 1

      ADSL boosters won't help where there is no copper running directly from the dslam to the house. This will not help the situation where someone is on a (non adsl enabled) RIM because that's the only copper available running to their house.

    4. Re:Nice, now when are the RIMs going? by Aurix · · Score: 1

      Err, sorry, I screwed up. Seems it's not really a booster, more a miniture, cheaper DSLAM... Tops =)

    5. Re:Nice, now when are the RIMs going? by Kentsusai · · Score: 1

      Right on!

      I still don't have ADSL
      I'm 20 minutes from the Melbourne CBD too.

      I think they should start pushing wireless!

    6. Re:Nice, now when are the RIMs going? by fabs64 · · Score: 1

      interesting article on whirlpool atm about a new device that telstra are looking at that will extend adsl 1 an extra 20km, i'm sure could help you. esp since if telstra can extend it like that, then iinet and the independant isp's can extend it to 40km at adsl 2 speeds ;)

    7. Re:Nice, now when are the RIMs going? by swordfishBob · · Score: 1

      Cool thing is it's kinda both.. designed to be installed in small exchanges, or in a pit / on a pole and run using line power. I like that... hope it comes through.

      My employer has some fairly remote sites that get data thanks to "SCADS" - solar-powered box with 2M fibre upstream, ISDN / Frame Relay / pots downstream up to 30 x 64kpbs cumulative. They're scattered along some of the roads I travel.

      --
      -- All your bass are below two Hz
  5. You bastards! by winterdrake · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now why can't they have that available in the states...

    1. Re:You bastards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be happy with what you've got. Unless you're paying the exhoribitant 40GB rate, you won't get a download quota worth shit.

    2. Re:You bastards! by longbot · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've noticed that in the US, the speeds are generally lower, but we're fortunate not to have monthly transfer caps. In other countries, they usually have faster speeds, but anywhere from 2-40GB per month (typically "hard" - as in "shut you down") caps.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it! --Longbottle
    3. Re:You bastards! by mikael_j · · Score: 1
      The only ISPs here in Sweden that I've heard of that have/had download caps were Chello (and I haven't heard anything about them in years) and some ISP up north that have a monthly cap for data downloaded from outside their network (but otoh they offer 10/100Mbps and there are DC hubs run by people on their network that are only for those using the same ISP, so zoom zoom zoom there...)

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    4. Re:You bastards! by longbot · · Score: 1

      How hard is it to immigrate?

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it! --Longbottle
    5. Re:You bastards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy. You just need to be blonde, have an awesome tan, great looks, paint your face blue and yellow, know all those chants they do at the tennis, and you're in.

    6. Re:You bastards! by Primacy · · Score: 1

      Move to Vermont! We have that and are moving towards ADSL2+ soon, along with fiber-to-the-home.

    7. Re:You bastards! by lovswr · · Score: 1

      What the incumbenet telco's will tell you; stranded costs. The real reason is more likely that they have to keep "showing" growth in revenue & earnings in order to remain attractive to their stockholders. Backbone wise, there is more than enough unlit fiber to give blanket, say 20 to 30Mbs residential coverage (I am assuming that your post replies to home use) already. The problem is they are not interested in selling B/W, although I suspect that many /. want reliable, low latency B/W & nothing else. Unfortunately, just selling B/W is not very fun for the marketers & all those other business types who don't really do anything. No the telco's are much more interested in selling "services" that they can charge on a per use basis. As a side note to this question, Verizon has comitted to FTTH in their regional area to the tune of several billion USD. So we can only hope, can't we!?! :)

  6. Bah...lucky Australians by halo1982 · · Score: 2

    Time Warner just switched us over to 5.0Mb/384Kb and I thought that was great. For $43US a month. Bah! Lucky Australians. When we do get ADSL2+ over here we'll be at the mercy of SBC for $40+ a month.

    1. Re:Bah...lucky Australians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have been complaining for year on the limited speeds we have been getting on our networks. We have been stuck at 1.5 since we got DSL.

      The bigest problem is bandwidth, it is possible to get an unlimited (static IP, servers allowed) on a 1.5/.5 for $150AU. But most users are paying $70AU for 3-6gb plans a month.

      Plus a lot of people are on RIMs that ensure that not everyone can utilise this.

    2. Re:Bah...lucky Australians by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      Time Warner just switched us over to 5.0Mb/384Kb and I thought that was great.

      How often do you actually download something at 5.0Mb/s? There are only a handful of servers in the world that would let a public internet connection download at that speed...

    3. Re:Bah...lucky Australians by Gob+Blesh+It · · Score: 1

      Where in the U.S. do you live? I'm on Road Runner in NYC, and I haven't seen an increase in my speed... then again, I leech off one of the thirty wireless networks in range of my apartment. So who knows.

    4. Re:Bah...lucky Australians by Ark42 · · Score: 1


      Hey at least SBC will likely let you use the full 6TB/month that you could pull with 20mbit, right?

    5. Re:Bah...lucky Australians by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "How often do you actually download something at 5.0Mb/s?"

      I max out my 4 megabit line pretty routinely, actually. I'm having difficulty feeling envious, though, as I nearly never have to wait for anything.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:Bah...lucky Australians by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Funny

      You've never downloaded Bit-Torrents have you?

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    7. Re:Bah...lucky Australians by psy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually its not so lucky.

      99.9% of australian broadband adsl servers provide download caps. Normally this is between 5gig to 15/20gig and is split into peak/off peak hours. Once that is passed there will be an extra charge or the service will be slowed down to 32-64kb/s depending on the provider.

      Also on the story in order to get that you need to bundle with their phone service too ($29.95 per month AU), and you need to be on their DSLAM. Otherwise you are limited to 1.5Mb.

      Alot of users are complaining about the bundling in this forum post, as if you dont bundle you will get a higher cost along with half the download quota.

    8. Re:Bah...lucky Australians by mboverload · · Score: 1
      Bittorrents can fill up any connection. Thats how bittorrent works, it can and will use TONS of bandwidth.

      I need a 320kb/s connection because my regular 129kb/s maxes out about 75% of the time.

    9. Re:Bah...lucky Australians by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      5.0Mb/s is actually pretty slow. That's only 600 KB/s -- and an easy speed to reach. I've downloaded at over 2 MB/s (16Mb/s) from a public server before...

      --
      Be relentless!
    10. Re:Bah...lucky Australians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note: $29 AUSTRALIAN !!!!

      Wind back to 2001, make about 15 USD.

    11. Re:Bah...lucky Australians by p0rnking · · Score: 1

      Rogers upped their bandwidth a few months ago to 5Mbps for $45 + $80 (all in Canadian $$$) for the modem.
      As for how often do I actually speeds? Well, whenever I'm downloading torrents, I get around 600kbps (steady, not peak).

    12. Re:Bah...lucky Australians by strider44 · · Score: 1

      My brother works for a large ISP in Aus and is connected to the backbone of the internet at work. He has gotten over half a gigabyte per second on bit torrent.

    13. Re:Bah...lucky Australians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So us Aussies have it lucky now.. beh! I say!

      8 MBit/sec with a 40GB cap then your shaped down to 64kbit/sec

    14. Re:Bah...lucky Australians by novakreo · · Score: 1

      How often do you actually download something at 5.0Mb/s? There are only a handful of servers in the world that would let a public internet connection download at that speed...

      Pretty much every few days with Gentoo updates and such. http://mirror.aarnet.edu.au/, http://mirror.pacific.net.au/, and http://planetmirror.com/ are all open to the public (well, mirror.aarnet.edu.au is reportedly .au only, I've never had the chance to see for myself), and very fast from my broadband connection here in Melbourne.

      --
      O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!
    15. Re:Bah...lucky Australians by morbiuswilters · · Score: 1

      You can get 3+ MegaBytes per second from microsoft's servers so long as your connection can handle it. Makes those service packs less bothersome...

      --
      I have come here to chew memory and kick ass... and malloc() is returning a null pointer.
    16. Re:Bah...lucky Australians by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Its not that good, basically its only available in capital cities, and even then its limited. Furthermore they have obscenely small caps and the going rate for over use charges is 10 cents a meg. This can really really add up.

    17. Re:Bah...lucky Australians by bernywork · · Score: 1

      One problem with this, writing it to the disk that fast.

      --
      Curiosity was framed; ignorance killed the cat. -- Author unknown
    18. Re:Bah...lucky Australians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in France we get 20Mb/s without caps for 30/month (since December with ADSL2+)
      Correct-me if I'm wrong, but it was in France that ADSL2+ was first implemented.

    19. Re:Bah...lucky Australians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. Thats a full CDs worth of data in less than 1.4 seconds. Internet2 speed records are around the 0.8-0.9 GB/s mark. I just don't believe you could get 0.5+ GB/s of a torrent.

    20. Re:Bah...lucky Australians by BurnFEST · · Score: 1

      Half a gigabit, myabe, half a gigabyte? I doubt it, that would mean he has some uber fantastic network adapter in his workstation.

    21. Re:Bah...lucky Australians by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      I guess Bittorrent is the obvious exception that I didn't note... it'll max out any connection.

      But still, since most internet users don't download large files on a regular basis, and since most ISPs don't really have the ability to serve 10 customers with a 5Mbps connection, how useful is 5Mbps?

    22. Re:Bah...lucky Australians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When was the last time you actully got 3Mbps, let alone 5Mbps, out of your cable modem? How about instead of increasing the cap timewarners of the world just fix their OVER-subscribed systems?

    23. Re:Bah...lucky Australians by batkiwi · · Score: 1

      29$ is for 500 megs, then you're charged up to around 70$, then throttled down to 64kbps. You have it better.

      I pay 89$ for 30gigs at 1.5/256, which is par for course in australian broadband.

    24. Re:Bah...lucky Australians by meyerj88 · · Score: 1

      Hey..I'd rather have SBC than my provider Centurytel. I hate Centurytel but they are the only provider in my rural area because they charge other ISPs too much to use their network or equipment. So, I get stuck with 768kbps/128kbps for 30$ per month and that was after we switched to a bundle package. Its $40.00 per month seperately. In addition, the max speed available is only 1.5mbps while SBC offers, I believe, up to 3.0 mbps. If only I was 8 miles south. Then I would be able to get SBC. Oh well, its still better than dialup. Especially since I'm in a rural area.

  7. Sounds like a move in the right direction by Benaiah · · Score: 1
    As an iinet customer I am usually happy with their prices and the fact that they are the first to come up with better value for customers. They were one of the first companies in australia to introduce the speed cap once you hit your download limit rather than the traditional charge by the megabyte.

    Now if only they let us get static ip's for home accounts.

    1. Re:Sounds like a move in the right direction by heydonms · · Score: 1

      What you mention as a side note is the reason I won't be switching. Im not terribly happy with my current ISP and I could certainly use the extra bandwidth, but it is no use to me without a static IP. These accounts would be perfect for many of our customers who run a VPN. I would love to be able to stream music from home without dragging ssh to a screaming halt. Without even the option of a static IP Im not interested. (Could this be their plan, keep of the really hard core users until they have upgraded their network to handle it, someone else posted that their current network is rather underspec for what they are offering)

    2. Re:Sounds like a move in the right direction by POds · · Score: 1

      Maybe you'd prefer dodo then. They have static IP, as far as i'm aware.

      --


      Giving IE users a taste of their own medicine since 2005 - http://pods.-is-a-geek.net/
  8. VoIP by Gurezaemon · · Score: 1

    iiNet is forcing customers to take their long distance phone service as well to get access to the 8Mbit/s speeds

    With speeds such as these, users may be able to avoid the long distance phone service with something by using services such as Skype's paid service, which is bound to be a lot cheaper.

    1. Re:VoIP by Exter-C · · Score: 1

      The Sykpe service is often pretty poor within Australia for international calls because the latency is circa 180ms on average. This leaves a call from west coast australia to east coast US with a heavy lag and poor quality.

    2. Re:VoIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lag!!

    3. Re:VoIP by benbalbo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The phone system over here allows you to select which carrier you use on a per phone call basis by prefixing with any number with a 4 digit selctor code, eg 1411 for Telstra (I believe).

      If iiNet force us to sign up and preselect to their long distance (i.e. you get carried by them by default) can't we just override on a per call setting?

      If so, we can still use our preferred long distance carriers, while getting the benefit of 8M broadband...

    4. Re:VoIP by SlightOverdose · · Score: 1

      Or you can get a second line with iiNet for $30/month and don't use it. (Which gives you a $10 off on the net, so it's really only $20/month). :-)

    5. Re:VoIP by brettporter · · Score: 1

      I upgraded immediately - I already had a slower speed iiNet connection with the phone preselect, for the same cost. The fact is that this is a good deal - the phone call costs are far better than any other carrier ($2.50/hr to the US) and the line rental is comparable, and then you get your broadband cheaper. No contracts and good tech support. As long as the service levels remain, then they appear to be the best deal in town.

    6. Re:VoIP by goonerw · · Score: 1

      With the exception of the fact that Aussies MUST have a local call provider attached to the line that is using DSL. There is no business way to get DSL without it. (Yes I know that there aren't any technical reasons why it can't be done) Telstra even have a product with almost no line rental charges. The only caveat, it doesn't support DSL.

      --
      LOAD ".SIG"
      PRESS PLAY ON TAPE
  9. Re:Why none of you idiots talk about UPSTREAM ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    8mbit down / 1 mbit up

  10. This is fully sick by log2.0 · · Score: 1

    I have a mate that works at and he said that they have also been looking at adsl2 and were going to implement it soon. I expect more ISP's to jump on this as well so 1.5mbit ADSL will become like dialup: "you wait overnight for a DVD download...haha"

    Its cool how bandwith is going through the roof now :)

    --
    Can your karma go above being Excellent?
    1. Re:This is fully sick by log2.0 · · Score: 1

      sorry to reply to myself but the mate worked at an anon isp ;) I put it in "less than, greater than" brackets and slashdot got rid of the "html tag"

      --
      Can your karma go above being Excellent?
    2. Re:This is fully sick by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 2, Informative

      All my folks back home are stuck on dial-up. The pricing is just not competitive enough to make them want to switch. They can get most of what they want done over dial up.
      Local calls aren't timed either.
      It has to happen eventually. My mother will go insane if my father keeps using her phone line for the PC.

      ------
      halt
      Whoops. I confused my laptop's terminal for the production mail server's.

      --
      READY.
      PRINT ""+-0
    3. Re:This is fully sick by mboverload · · Score: 1
      Through the roof? When we get fiber to home THEN you can say we have fast speeds.

      6 mbit speeds are still nothing for what we will need to tranfer UDTV (Next-gen after HDTV, going to be crazy quality).

    4. Re:This is fully sick by axxs · · Score: 1

      Moving from the city to the country was a big eye-opener for me about the state of bandwidth in Australia ... it's centralised around cities .. outside of that it's very poor ... infrastructure is the problem.

      These announcements mean little if anything for people outside of the major cities, as ADSL is only available to those few close enough to exchanges. .. Considering you can't seem to get an ADSL connection other than being under 5km from the exchange, if that .. most folk are on dialup. I connect from home on a 56k modem and the BEST i can hope to achieve is 26kbs.

      Of course I am about 10 mins drive from a major rural township, not in it, but that's Australia for you ;)

    5. Re:This is fully sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is fully sick.... correction:
      Thorpey says it is "fully sick" :P

  11. only 256k up? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    I never fully understood this; the hardware is designed for XMB up and down, why do they criple the uplink bandwidth? Is this simply to convince the weak willed people to buy their colocated server space, or to upgrade to a "buisness" grade account?

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
    1. Re:only 256k up? by log2.0 · · Score: 1

      the new plan will have 1MBit upstream

      RTFA...j/k :)

      --
      Can your karma go above being Excellent?
    2. Re:only 256k up? by shione · · Score: 1

      It's to discourage trading of warez

    3. Re:only 256k up? by Hadlock · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's still strange though. While 1MBit upstream is nothing to sneeze at, I'm really curious as to the technical aspect of why we can't have 8MBit full duplex, or even half-duplex, but in each direction. Back in the day you could order 512MBit, and it came with 256Mbit upstream... which was reasonable, since they were offering the 512down/512up to buisness owners for roughly triple what the "home" upstream bandwidth cost, my guess being for website hosting reasons.

      Nowadays it's cheaper to buy hosting at XYZ company for $100/yr and do it that way rather than host your own web site, and very rarely do buisness customers (I assume) go through their telco for webhosting, so it would make sense to no longer artifically restrict the bandwidth to home users.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    4. Re:only 256k up? by Craigj0 · · Score: 1

      The reason that upload speed is slower is because the technology required to send bits is much more expensive than the technology to decode bits. Hence they use a cheaper but slower sender at the users end to keep the price of ADSL modems low (it is in the standard). The designers considered what the technology would be used for and decided on this compromise of cost/speed.

    5. Re:only 256k up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the 8Mb accounts you can get up to 1Mb upload. Thats as fast as we can get with aDSL(1).

      Its got nothing to do with trying to sell colo or preventing warez trading. Thats the physical limitation. Hence the name asynchronous digital subscriber line.

    6. Re:only 256k up? by Hadlock · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Do you have any "tech" to back that up? I certianly haven't found any. It's not like the MPAA or RIAA would have any legal grounds for suing them for the files going across their network. Initially warez was a problem, with the limited bandwidth of broadband "back in the day". With 8/20Mbit networks, you could trade everything you have and fill your entire hard drive in a couple of weeks and not really strain the network, as most files should finish not long after you click on them.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    7. Re:only 256k up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm calling bullshit. More likely is that they decided most people would be downloading, not uploading, and hence designed the tech to cope accordingly by default. This is also implied by the fact that you can, if you want, buy symmetrical services; it just costs more (eg: 512/512 instead of 512/128 or 1024/256).

    8. Re:only 256k up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Normal people intall lots p2p programs, they don't know anything about how they work, so normally they just upload with all their bandwidth all the time their pc is turned on.

      ISP's have to cap either bandwidth or traffic, otherwise their net would support all the other p2p users out there.

      I manage a 30mbit connection for about 200people, if we didn't block p2p, then 1 or 2 people would start uploading to 500people and leave their pc turned on. 3mb/s for a month is a lot of traffic.

    9. Re:only 256k up? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Is it really better to ban P2P apps, rather than say, elastically give P2P apps 60% of the avalible (as in not currently being used by overhead of other things, port 80 and the like) upline bandwidth? Even with lots of acks and TCP/IP overhead, it would seem that 60% of the "free" upline bandwidth would still come out to be 15Mbit. (Which, I guess comes out to be about 256KB per person for 120 of your 200 users).

      Thanks for solving/helping me solve this mystery.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    10. Re:only 256k up? by Telvin_3d · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that assumes that the ISPs care enough to go to anything like that amout of trouble. Might be a nice solution for a smaller network, but the types of big buisnesses that typicaly run large scale ICP services are more likely to completely block certain ports or programs before they did that kind of thing. After all, there is not enough competition, and they all know their competitors will do the same thing, so it is not like they are risking customers.

    11. Re:only 256k up? by gtoomey · · Score: 3, Informative
      No. You get sdsl with the same modem as adsl.

      The reason is that most ISP data centres run servers (lots of outbound, little inbound) and retail customers (lots of inbound, little outbound). This "evens out" bandwidth usage.

    12. Re:only 256k up? by SlightOverdose · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Much to learn, you have.

      Let me tell you about telstra.

      When I had my internet connection moved from another ISP to iiNet, they had to plug me into the iinet DSlam. Normally this would be a simple thing to do- just move the cable to the next rack and plug me back in.

      Telstra, however, turns this into:
      1: request disconnection
      2. after a few days, tech goes out and unplugs me
      3. Telstra sends a bill
      4. Pay bill
      5. request connection
      6. after a few days, tech goes out and plugs me in
      7. Pay bill
      8. Line doesn't work. Turns out telstra fucked up
      9. request telstra to fix it
      10. wait a few days, tech goes out and fixes it
      11. Telstra sends a bill
      12. pay bill

      well, you get the point.

    13. Re:only 256k up? by mcbridematt · · Score: 1

      The maximum down/up on the Telstra wholesale network is 1536/256k. No exceptions. Want more upload speed? Pay for 512/512, which is actually 1536 downstream shaped down at the Telstra network level. Of course - you still have to qualify for a 1536/256k service. If you don't: Too bad. Your line may be capable of a "OMFG IT ISN'T BROADBAND" 256/64 or 512/128 service, but Telstra doesn't care.

      However, in Areas where iiNet have installed their own DSLAM's, the upload speed is unlocked, i.e it will go right up to the max up speed suppored by the users phyiscal phone line.

      Bandwidth costs suck bigtime here in Aus - ~$800 per megabit or on a ratio of in/out are the usual pricing options. Want a 100mbit Ethernet Internet connection? - Telstra would rather you take something a lot lot less.

    14. Re:only 256k up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its an ASYMMETRIC digital subscriber line, invented prior to 80%(?) of traffic being p2p. At this stage there was much more desire for more downstream than upstream for users, so it was provisioned this way.

    15. Re:only 256k up? by biryokumaru · · Score: 1

      maybe its a conspiracy of all the companies that run teh intarnets, and they're keepin the price up so the proletariat can't compete!!! its the man keepin us down! damn the man!

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    16. Re:only 256k up? by camcloud1 · · Score: 0

      >>"I'm really curious as to the technical aspect of why we can't have 8MBit full duplex, or even half-duplex, but in each direction.

      Because then you could essentially run your own server and charges other for dialup access. The upload speed is limited on purpose.

    17. Re:only 256k up? by asaul · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This page has some of the gory details:

      "The ITU has approved a global industry standard for full-rate ADSL, known as G.992.1, or G.dmt. This specification calls for operation rates of up to 10 Mbps downstream and up to 768 kbps upstream when operating over telephone lines at distances of up to 18,000 feet."

      So basically the specification for the signalling has allocated a slab of the frequencies to upload, and the rest to download. Your provider can mix and match within that, but I expect that due to signal attenuation and overall bandwidth demand they limit it to what is currently provided.

      Symmetrical DSL (512/512) is designed to run over a shorter loop (so limited customer range), and as most users dont use much upload capacity there is little point in providing it generally - the users that do want it will pay for a service that delivers it.

      --
      "If everybody is thinking alike, somebody isn't thinking" - Gen. George S. Patton
    18. Re:only 256k up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally hear you. When I lived in Australia (I'm in the UK temporarily) it was a mission to get anything done with them. We had no phone service for a week because they refused to fix the phone line that a previous tech had managed to kill.

    19. Re:only 256k up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We haven't had 30mbit all the time and our current price is based on how much traffic we used to have., so if we can keep our traffic down, then we do it.

      Officially we are banning p2p just because it's a bandwisth hog. Unofficailly we are banning p2p because people don't really need it, they can just talk to their neighbour, there's plenty of movies, music and games on our intranet.

    20. Re:only 256k up? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Ah, thank you.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    21. Re:only 256k up? by OzRoy · · Score: 1

      The only synchronous ADSL plans in Australia are 512/512. If you want a higher synchronous plans you have get shdsl which requires a different modem to normal residential ADSL.

    22. Re:only 256k up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The easiest way to explain it is to imagine that your phone line is split up into three parts. Low Frequency, High Frequency and Ultra High Frequency.

      Voice uses 0 - 4 Khz, Upstream is 25 - 160khz and downstream is 240Khz and above. The amount of space above 240Khz varies on line quality, so a decent line will have more bandwidth than a noisy line.

      Therefore the Upstream stays static as it uses a fixed 25-160khz band which means the upstream bandwidth is always capped. It has nothing to do with ISP's and IP traffic. It is an agreed ANSI standard that all equipment manufacturers must adhere to.

  12. Well I've signed up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Telstra was charging me what iiNet wants for phone rental anyway, and I mostly use Skype for my calls. I'm not far from my exchanges too, so I should get the full 8mbit/s...

  13. Sounds like fun! by SKPhoton · · Score: 0

    I'll bet the Koala bears are thrilled about the possiblity of getting broadband in their eucalyptus trees!

    Lucky little dudes!

    1. Re:Sounds like fun! by log2.0 · · Score: 1

      Koala's are not bears ;)

      Heh, we need to kill lots of them anyway on Kangaroo Island. No, it's not because the 'roo's don't like them :D

      --
      Can your karma go above being Excellent?
    2. Re:Sounds like fun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bet the Koala bears are thrilled about the possiblity of getting broadband in their eucalyptus trees!

      Koalas aren't bears, dickhead.

    3. Re:Sounds like fun! by felixmeister · · Score: 1

      Neither are Drop Bears, but thats what everyone calls them.

      It's just a commonly added adjective as they are furry cute and kinda look like bears, although the size of the fangs on the drop bears are a little off-putting.

      --
      Vorlon tavutna chog!
  14. That's all good... by O-SUSHi · · Score: 0

    ... but after I RTFA, I quickly had my hopes extinguished. Sure we get fast speeds, but no data transfer to compliment it. 80gb (40gb/40gb off-peak) is good for everyone, but with 20mbit, I'm sure it would take 'no-time' (please don't do the math anyone) to get used to using it up quickly. Although this is good for driving the prices down, so maybe Optus/Telstra will up the ante and remove the the 128k upstream cap at least...

    --
    Remember children, all generalizations are wrong.
    1. Re:That's all good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure it would take 'no-time' (please don't do the math anyone) to get used to using it up quickly

      What math? 8mb/sec = 1MB/sec
      20mbit = 2.5MB/sec

      [Heavy with iiPhone]
      40GB(40960MB) @ 1MB/sec= = 40960sec = 11.3hr
      40GB(40960MB) @ 2.5MB/sec = 16384sec = 4.6hr

      [Starter with iiPhone]
      2GB peak + 2GB offpeak
      2GB = 2048MB

      2048MB @ 1MB/sec = 2048sec = .57hr
      2048MB @ 2.5MB/sec = 819.2sec = .23hr

      [Pay as you Go plan]
      500MB @ 1MB/sec = 500sec = .14hr
      +6 cents/sec
      500MB @ 2.5MB/sec = 200sec = .06hr or 3min
      +15 cents/sec

    2. Re:That's all good... by BurnFEST · · Score: 1

      Actually a 1GB in Australian ISP terms is only really 1000MB, stupid I agree, but there you go.

  15. Even if I had 20M... by meridian · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Most times I connect to overseas, and the latency/window size is the biggest speed issue. Even sitting on a 100Mb/s pipe to MCI at work you rarely see speeds above 2Mb/s to any site overseas especially if using TCP not UDP due to the latency issues and the nature of TCP windowing. OK so it might be fast to connect to other people on IInet, but thats the only bonus. Currently I have 6Mb/s ADSL to home in Australia (only one on my ISP with it from what I understand) and while I reach breakneck speeds to mirror.aarnet.edu.au on the Optus network to whom my ISP's primary provider is, I rarely see anything above 512kb/s to overseas sites. Going to just get unlimited 512k to the ISP I work for. No point getting any higher in Australia if your connecting to international stuff most of the time. And no its not because my ISPs are shit its just how it is being on the other side of the world. Fast to Singapore tho!

    --
    meridian at tha.net
    1. Re:Even if I had 20M... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mmmm I'm downloading at 400k/s

    2. Re:Even if I had 20M... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And no its not because my ISPs are shit its just how it is being on the other side of the world. Fast to Singapore tho!

      You would think the Australian government would setup a Universal Internet Mirror that contains the Internet locally.

    3. Re:Even if I had 20M... by darkewolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      You do realise you can connect to multiple sites at once? I get around 760k/s max out of my DSL now. I tend to go to archive.org and download 3 or 4 creative commons movies down at once - each appears rate limited (by archive.org) at 130k/s - but all 4 come down at the same(ish) speed. Mind you, one or two International sites have given me 400-500k/s - just not often. But I like to be able to download whilst not affecting my VPN or other things.

      --
      "That is not dead which can eternal lie...."
      Nimheil
    4. Re:Even if I had 20M... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes? And your cap is?

      This discussion is about how much of your bandwidth you can normally use on high speed connections.

    5. Re:Even if I had 20M... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well in that case I have to point out that there is a fundamental difference between "how much of your bandwidth you can normally use" and "how much of your bandwidth you normally use".

      I use on average around 20k/s down and I'm going to go with 30k/s up, thats just how I use my connection.

      If I want to for example open a webpage I can download at whatever the site will allow me to (50k/s for purposes of the example), with 8meg I can therefore theoretically' download from 16 sites, each at the speed the site will allow.

      For reference my 'cap' is ?36ish? gig (I stopped caring about cap - theres not much out there I want to download, but theres plenty out there I want to download 'fast').

    6. Re:Even if I had 20M... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going to just get unlimited 512k to the ISP I work for. No point getting any higher in Australia if your connecting to international stuff most of the time.

      I have 1500/256 with Netspace. I often see near saturation with overseas stuff (USA and Europe).

      Sure the latency sucks, but seeing 160k bytes/sec downloads is pretty common for me.

      I have used lots of different DSL offerings as a network techie in Sydney, they pretty much all suck. I thank goodness a mate of mine got me onto Netspace. Now whenever one of my customers complains about their shit DSL, I recommend Netspace (no I don't apply for the credits this may bring and no I don't work, never worked and don't plan to work for Netspace).

      My mates at work do not beleive me when I tell them I often see near saturation. They think I should never be seeing it with DSL. Which should give people a clue into how crap Aussie DSL is.

      iBurst wireless is pretty awesome, BTW. Can't say the same for UnWired though.

    7. Re:Even if I had 20M... by crunk · · Score: 1
      You bring up a really good point. People seem to forget that you are not going to be downloading at 8Mb/s from _anywhere_ unless you have at least 8Mb/s bandwidth from your home, through the Internet, to the destination you are downloading from.

      For example, if I host my website on a T-1 line from the phone company (1.5Mb/s Up/down), it is not possible for you to download from me any faster than 1.5Mb/s period. We use a single T-1 to host a couple of different websites at my work, and I imagine this is the case for several companies.

      --
      It's the battle of the minds, and everyone's unarmed.
    8. Re:Even if I had 20M... by Joel+from+Sydney · · Score: 1

      I've never really noticed this at all! I'm on a 1.5/256 DSL link with Internode, and downloads from sites with a lot of bandwidth (eg Gmail) will generally fill my pipe. Bittorrent will pretty much always max out my connection if I let it....

  16. Gee, rest of the world is moving to ever faster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The rest of the world is moving to ever faster and cheaper broadband, and I'm sitting here paying $60 a month for comcrap with upload speed equall to 32Kbits modem

  17. Australia can have their shitty service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I get 5Mbps and it is damn fine enough for all the web surfing I want to do. I can't imagine that anyone would give a shit whether their HTML and images come in at 1Mbps or 5Mbps.
    Downloading source code, debs, and amateur pornography is where the speed really shines.
    That being said 500MB is good for some light webbrowsing of an individual, but not much else. 4GB is also quite poor, especially if you don't live alone. There is virtually no point in such paltry download quotas. A big pipe is virtually useless if you can realistically eat it up in a week.

    1. Re:Australia can have their shitty service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      awww... poor thing... you've turned all green with envy! sooo *cute*!

  18. 26Mbit/sec VDSL for two years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Huh? I have had 8 MBit through my telephone wires for two years now via www.bostream.nu, 35 USD per month. Had I lived closer, a few hundred yards, to the switch it would have been up to 26 Mbit/sec.

  19. Yay Australia by Corbie · · Score: 1

    This is quite spiffy, I must say. Yet another country where data is not hindered (much) by corporate-lobbied government.
    Don't get me wrong. This is great news for all the Aussies out there . . I'm just tired of overpriced, substandard broadband being the common consumer link here in the States. Perhaps WiMax will change some of this, but it's still going to be sometime before it is adequately ubiquitous and it's hardly a silver bullet.
    It's a shame that by the time US citizens finally do start getting things like FTTP, every other country will be using realtime neural uplinks.

    1. Re:Yay Australia by sc0ob5 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You Have got to be kidding me.. Overpriced broadband in the states? sorry, did I read that right? I have been paying around $70us a month for 1.5mbit adsl..

      It's about time we get decent broadband, too bad its from some no name company that no one has ever heard of.

    2. Re:Yay Australia by tooth · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yet another country where data is not hindered

      We've had telstra hindering our speeds for years, and we've been paying for it... iinet has worked around this by rolling out its own infrastructure. trust me, if you lived here or been following it a bit more closely you'd know how many australians envied the US... of course now we envy Hong Kong and Korea :)

    3. Re:Yay Australia by NightRain · · Score: 2, Informative

      iiNet is the largest provider of ADSL behind Telstra and Optus, and soon to be the 3rd largest ISP overall. They don't do many TV ads I'll admit, but I don't know that "no one has ever heard of" is exactly accurate either :)

    4. Re:Yay Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems like you're just a fucking idiot.

    5. Re:Yay Australia by thogard · · Score: 1

      They are hindering in all sorts of ways. The nice HiBis rural plan let them put many of the new startup wireless guys out of business. The paperwork to get a carrier license (just so you can run a WIPS) is thicker than a phone book.

    6. Re:Yay Australia by OzRoy · · Score: 1

      Instead Australians have had to put up with the Corporate monopoly known as Telstra who service all the wholesale DSL in Australia, AND have their own retail division.

      They have been responsible for wonderful retail plans that have been cheaper than what they charge wholesale to other providers making it impossible to compete.

      While the rest of the world has been living in an unlimited download data haven, Australians have been artificially limited by restrictive data caps which traditionally have been around the 10Gig a month mark. It has only been in the last 12 months that competition has allowed it to climb to the very generous 20 - 40 Gig caps we see today.

      It has only been because of constant pressure and fines from the ACCC that anything positive has happened at all with Australian DSL.

    7. Re:Yay Australia by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      You Have got to be kidding me.. Overpriced broadband in the states? sorry, did I read that right? I have been paying around $70us a month for 1.5mbit adsl..


      I'm in Finland, and I currently pay 54e/month (about $40) for 1MB/512KB ADSL. And this is one of the more expensive broadband-operators around here. If I wanted to, I could get full-rate ADSL2-connection (12MB/1MB) for 55e/month. And that's uncapped. And I have several operators to choose from (at least 4 by my count, propably more).
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    8. Re:Yay Australia by alienw · · Score: 1

      54euros is not 40 USD, it's about 73 USD with the current exchange rates. Buying stuff from Europe sucks now :(

    9. Re:Yay Australia by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      So it is! I guess my math sucks....

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  20. In Australia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    only old people use ADSL2+.

  21. Nice, but I cannot get DSL! by antdude · · Score: 1

    I am 20K ft. I would like to see phone companies reach out more to people like me. :(

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:Nice, but I cannot get DSL! by StArSkY · · Score: 1

      well you are obvioulsy not in Australia... because the highest peak here aint even 8000Ft.

      --
      lounge around on the blue couch
    2. Re:Nice, but I cannot get DSL! by antdude · · Score: 1

      Ha ha. Very phunny. :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    3. Re:Nice, but I cannot get DSL! by sexygirl.jpg.vbs · · Score: 1

      Please stop stealing all our socks.

    4. Re:Nice, but I cannot get DSL! by Seigen · · Score: 1

      I'm at 19,903 or at leasts thats what SBC said the previous time. Last time they said 30k. Regardless i'm on a pair gain. They are supposed to call me back this week with my options, if any for removing that pair gain. I suspect it will cost money if they can do that, and its doubtful SBC will sell me service then because they have a 19k limit. Cyberonic said they would try again if I could get rid of the pair gain, but they think I'm at 15,100ft. All in all SBC's current slogan of "What can I do to make you a very satisfied customer?" is annoying at best. It might be different if they weren't charging me $150 for the isdn line. (It has a repeater on it.) Wireless is a possibility, but its 384/384 for $100 with a 20GB cap and a 18 month you can't leave contract. All in all I'm not too impressed with the broadband offerings available in the middle of the US. SBC caters to those easy to get broadband to, and the rest can just wait till they get around to putting in a remote terminal once they think they can make money fast enough from it.

  22. Re:capped to 40GB/month by Ark42 · · Score: 1


    Thats still only 128kbit/sec. Horrible.

  23. Re:I don't live in Australia by enigma48 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Probably a troll, but just in case anyone else was paying attention:

    Australia seems to have weather very similar to North America, but better. I'm moving to Melbourne in a few days (holycrapholycrapholycrap) and according to the weather websites I read, their summers peak around 27C and winters drop to 7C. I doubt this takes humidity and windchill into effect.

    Anyone is welcome to correct me on this, but please provide a link.

  24. 1 GB Quota by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great stuff, now I can burn through a patethicly small quota even faster. I wonder how long it would take to get through the 1 GB quota at 20 Mbit for only $29.

    What a great deal.

  25. TV Commercials in US? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Has anyone seen the TV commercials airing in the US where they claim that US Broadband penetration is suck because of government regulation?

    I reflexively call bullshit and assume they just want to kill the CLEC's and are holding broadband hostage for it, but maybe someone here can verify or refute this.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:TV Commercials in US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at Sweden for a counterexample. Lots of government regulation and VERY GOOD coverage.

  26. I wonder.... by Landak · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they'll impose "Download limits" that are hidden into contracts, and also artificially cap up limits (I know, I should really RTF!)

    In this country- Britain - unless you want your ass capped, your ports blocked, and you very-much reminded of the a part of ADSL, you have to pay for it. £24.99 a month is what I'm paying for a 512kbs service with no blocked ports or limits and a lower contention ratio, as opposed to "consumer" grotty things like BT Broadband for £15.99 /month.

    I'm not sure how infrastructure could cope with tens of thousands of 20 mbit users- I wouldn't think very well though. Also, at that speed, most of your wait would be for the server you're trying to connect to...

    --
    My UID is prime. Is yours?
    1. Re:I wonder.... by mabinogi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, there are no hidden download limits in any Australian ADSL plans (that I know of).

      Instead there are upfront and well documented (sometimes part of the plan name itself) limits.
      Usually fairly small too by North American Cable based broadband standards.
      But we know they're there, they're not hidden, and you usually choose your plan based on the right combination of speed vs downloads for you.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
  27. Re:I don't live in Australia by opusman · · Score: 1

    Melbourne has a few days each summer of 37C or above, but summer average would be low-to mid 20s. Having said that, yesterday it was 33C and today is 19C, tomorrow 16C.. go figure.

  28. 10mbit eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That'll just get them to thier 5gb monthly limit faster.

  29. Re:Not so lucky by EvilCabbage · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This isn't even newsworthy yet.

    It's available to such a small slice of the population with such small data allowances, only the truly stoned and miraculously wealthy will be in line for it.

    Picture a pair of cans connected by a string hanging over a cesspool. That is the current Australian "Broadband" situation.

  30. Re:I don't live in Australia by log2.0 · · Score: 1

    haha, Melb is one of the coldest cities in Oz. It rains a lot there.

    I went to the Melbourne cup (a big horse race where the Australian economy freezes for a few mins) and it pissed down right after a morning of "perfect" weather.

    Having said that, I would say that Melb is one of the more trendy cities in Oz, so you should have fun.

    --
    Can your karma go above being Excellent?
  31. Re:I don't live in Australia by eggsome · · Score: 1

    Melbourne sucks, Sydney RULES!

    J/K they both suck, I'm just stuck in syd. :(

    --
    If they made a movie of your life, would anybody buy a ticket?
  32. Its about time. by Bobsledboy · · Score: 1

    With ADSL being the only readily available broadband technology in
    Australia, this is a welcome upgrade. I've been rubbing at the edges
    of my 1500 account for ages, so in the least, I'm happy :)

  33. Re:I don't live in Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm in Melbourne, and the Summer peaks at 38-40C, with usually one week or so of 35C+ temps. Summer mimumums can be low, but it may be 30C at 2am if it's been really hot. And it's dry heat, like an oven, for the most part. The Winter minimums can be as low as 0C, but below zero minimums are uncommon unless you are in the hills. Winter maximums are generally 10C+, with the occasional single digit day. No link for you unfortunately ... too much vodka ;-) But check www.theage.com.au for daily temps. Looking at today, it looks like Winter ... cold, wet, windy. No cricket practice tonight! Enjoy my city ... it's great! apart from weather like today in Summer!

  34. Re:I don't live in Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And we're interested in all the US-centric news too? Wow, come out of your tree you idiot.

  35. Re:I don't live in Australia by darkewolf · · Score: 1

    Alas, the summers can peak to around 42oC in places. Melbourne is often around the low to mid 30s in really bad summers. Western Australia however can go a lot lot lot higher.

    --
    "That is not dead which can eternal lie...."
    Nimheil
  36. Re:I don't live in Australia by O-SUSHi · · Score: 0

    Yeah, and today felt about 13C, in the middle of summer. It's forecast to go as low as 12C for the next 2 days. It's not horribly low, but its the middle of summer ffs.

    Have a happy stay in Melbourne, and for god sakes bring the weather with you!

    --
    Remember children, all generalizations are wrong.
  37. Sliding Windows Re:Even if I had 20M... by lazybeam · · Score: 3, Informative

    You just need to tweak your TCP/IP stack. For a 10MB/s transfer over 300ms latency you need a 3MB TCP buffer (window). Most operating systems don't allow the buffer to grow that large.

    --
    --
    no sig for you. come back one year.
  38. iinet by sowdog81 · · Score: 1

    I originally signed up for IInet back a couple of years ago when they offered an unlimited download package. Shortly thereafter the iinet servers broke under the combined strain from users everywhere and they had to revert to shaped bandwidth every night iirc. Sure 8mgb sounds like a great deal but they(isps) can find other ways to limit you.

    1. Re:iinet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Shortly thereafter the iinet servers broke under the combined strain from users everywhere and they had to revert to shaped bandwidth every night iirc.

      It happened once when they trialled unlimited downloads from midnight to 8am. That's why they introduced an off-peak quota.

  39. As an American ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... who recently (6 months ago) settled down in Sydney, I'm currently stuck with WestNet's (http://www.westnet.com.au/) 1.5/265kbps with 40GB/40GB peak/offpeak quota at A$139/month. Taking this after being on Speakeasy's 6mbps/768kpbs w/ no quotas at USD99/month, I've been suffering. At least I could get static IP even if I have to use PPPoA/E.

    When I heard about this, I was ecstatic but when I found out yesterday that I had to subscribe to their phone service as well, I decided not to jump. Any company using such tactic is generally not going to be one that's customer-oriented. WestNet at least just came out as Australia's #1 in terms of customer satisfcation.

    Not only is it bundled with a phone service, but as far as I can tell, I'd also be losing my single (and free) static IP that I get from WestNet.

    At this point I'm going sit this out for now and see how it develops in the next few weeks and months. Most likely though I'll stick with WestNet (look, after being with Speakeasy for nearly 5 years--I was previously with Flashcomm, yeah, you read that right, FLASHCOMM--I really feel like it's my first day in first grade again if I go sign-up with some ISP with crappy customer service. I survived Flashcomm and have no desire to repeat the experience) because their customer service does rock and would make it justifiable for me to wait.

    For all Americans saying "Lucky Australians" -- seriously, you have no clue how fortunate you are. It's true that the US is no Korea or Japan that even offers FTTH, but man, now that Speakeasy has become one of the dominant ISPs in the entire nation ... damn. Out of all the things I miss, Speakeasy.net is the one I miss the most, especially when their own page advertises an "enlightened policy" ... aaaah ...

    Thank goodness my work pays for part of my DSL monthly fee... I don't feel like I'm getting ripped-off too badly ...

    1. Re:As an American ... by xerxesdaphat · · Score: 1

      So who else reckons this AC is a Speakeasy astroturfer? lol...

      --
      The Shoes of the Fisherman's Wife Are Some Jive Ass Slippers
    2. Re:As an American ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah ... I have no clue what an astroturfer is but I'm honestly just a very satisfied Speakeasy customer. I was one of the first hundred people in the country to get the 6mbps offer ... I had recently upgraded to their 3mbps plan when not two months later I got an email saying they're bumping me to 6mbps. How can you not like that? (Of course, not two months later I was moved to Sydney by my work ... )

      I guess I have no way of convincing people of that but hey, whatver. Just my two cents worth now that I live in Sydney have to live with capped plans.

      I see another poster talking about how people understand that it's always capped .. To me, it's just ridiculous why you should accept it. The fact that the attitude is more "Well, it's always gonna be capped" instead of trying to demand change .. Well, ticks me off. But oh well. At least I'm in sunny Sydney .. whereas Boston (where I used to live) is now some 25 ft under the snow.

      Give and take. :)

  40. RTFM by pbjones · · Score: 5, Informative

    8Mb is max based on distance, it drops to almost current ADSL speeds after a km or so. It has the same 4km reach as current ADSL, so for many people there is only a marginal speed gain, yawn, which still makes cable faster in most cases. Also at the mubpond was announced that Telstra was looking at equipment that will extend the reach of ADSL, potentialy to 12kms or more, and make ADSL viable in small towns etc.

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
    1. Re:RTFM by vyXn · · Score: 1

      Not the case at all. I know people who are over 1km away from the exchange and still getting 8mbps, and people 3km out are still getting 4mpbs+, which is a lot faster than the "current" 1.5mbps.

      This graph provides a good idea of what you can expect from the original ADSL G.DMT standard, as well as from ADSL2 and 2+

      http://whirlpool.net.au/img/article/adsl2plus.jp g

      --
      s/redundant/redundant
    2. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, that's because it _is_ current DSL (ie ADSL1). They've just decided not to artificially limit the max speed like Telstra Wholesale does.

    3. Re:RTFM by pbjones · · Score: 1

      there are limits imposed on signal strength to prevent interference with the other services contained with the same cable sheath. I have seen these limits graphed and in the Australian case, limits will be imposed,not by Telstra but by the ACA.

      --
      There was an unknown error in the submission.
    4. Re:RTFM by Archon-X · · Score: 1

      I'm about 4km from 'my local'.
      Whilst on the phone with an iiNet tech, he did some specs on my line (quality etc) and said the theoretical max. for my distance was about 7.7MBit.

      I don't pretend to know anything about the technicalities, but that sounds nice.

      In other news, I'm yet to break over 400k (off a local network), and haven't gone over 200k/s from anywhere in the US (off 100MBits) so it would seem it is getting seriously throttled in the routing.

    5. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our house is 150 meters from the local exchange where iinet dslams are installed. 20mps (even if its only burst) is sensational.

  41. yeah, by MoOsEb0y · · Score: 3, Funny

    and use up your bandwidth limit for the month within 10 minutes of using the thing at full speed.

  42. Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    Several problems that I can see offhand. First: data caps. Those that are most likely to be drawn to the higher speeds are also those that are most likely to be hit with shaping -- ie, dropping back to 64 kbps transfer rates. When the appeal is for 8000 kbps ... two orders of magnitude drop in transfer rates? Sheesh. (Understandable, though; they want to try to discourage leechers.)

    Second problem: they're rolling the tech out in a limited number of exchanges. I'm on the Tally Ho exchange; that isn't on the list of exchanges to receive the tech (Victorian exchanges to date: Box Hill, Brunswick, Collingwood, Exhibition, Hawthorn, North Melbourne, Northcote, Richmond and South Melbourne, with Windsor and Lonsdale in progress.) Good luck trying to get it outside those exchanges.

    This strikes me as being more of a marketing exercise than anything else. It'll take at least a year or more before it reaches even a reasonable proportion of the metropolitan population ... and then there's the rural users to worry about. To put this into perspective: Australia is the size of the forty-eight continental states, but has the population (roughly) of the state of New York. We're very sparsely populated, and much of this technology is geared towards densely populated areas...

    1. Re:Meh. by FruitCak · · Score: 1

      thats cause no one cares about the arse end of australia, victoria.

      iiNet have deployed their hardware to where their customers are.

      --
      I'm me. I think.
    2. Re:Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've got almost all of Perth covered - and a pretty ambitious rollout scheduled for other capitals

    3. Re:Meh. by ttys00 · · Score: 1

      Thats because they are a Perth company - half of the guys I went to uni with worked on the helpdesk there in the 90s. I'm surprised they've done so much in Melbourne to be honest, I figured they would have targeted Sydney first.

  43. Re:I don't live in Australia by mister_tim · · Score: 1

    Australia seems to have weather very similar to North America
    Well, there's nowhere as cold as New England, but Northern Australia would get as hot as Florida. And both countries have sizable deserts (although Australia has a greater proportion of desert).

    I've never lived in Melbourne, but I love visiting there. It's a wonderful city.

  44. Not hidden at all. by jpharri · · Score: 1

    Download limits are specifically advertised, extra data amounts/month adds $$$.
    The smallest data allowance is a mere 500MB/month @ $30(requires phone bundling). The largest is 80GB/month @ $90 - again after switching your phone across.

  45. Re:capped to 40GB/month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    no, no it is not.

    it is 8Mbit/s.

    No one in Australia is ever under the misaprehension that they have unlimited downloads, so they always look at both the speed and the download allowance, and therefore choose a plan that has the right combination of download size and speed.

    Leechers are probably always better off with slower plans with larger allowances (and unlimited ones do exist at a lot of ISPs, but obviously cost a little more than capped ones), but the rest of us are quite happy to be able to download the occasional .iso in a few minutes.
    We have better things to do with our time than spend all day, every day downloading DVDs we'll never watch.
    40GB is more than enough for most mortal uses.

    Complaining about caps simply DOES NOT APPLY to Australian broadband, because apart from the very early days when barely anyone used it and Telstra and Optus cable were the only way you were going to get it anyway, ISPs have always capped the plans, and always been very clear about the capping.

  46. Re:Why none of you idiots talk about UPSTREAM ? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    Because in the ISP business, upload bandwidth is a commodity. You can have your download dirt cheap. But you gotta PAY for the upload. So unless you want to pay through the nose, fogettaboutit!

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  47. Re:I don't live in Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Melbourne's weather is a bit hit and miss. Yesterday, for example, it hit over 30 degrees for the max (dry all day); today, it was 13 degrees or so and wet all day. Try the following links for averages around the city: Distances are very rough and ready, and are probably wildly inaccurate; still, it gives you some sort of an idea. Hope this helps.

    As a rough guide, our winters (in Melbourne) are similar to Canada's autumn (eg: Toronto, Vancouver) heat-wise; humidity is usually not a major problem. Wind chill can be a concern, but it's not a major one.

  48. Unfortunately, bandwidth costs in Australia... by Meetch · · Score: 4, Informative
    Being such a geographically sparse country, investment in infrastructure generally involves a lot more up-front cost than say, Sweden (most European countries come to think of it), per person. Think about it - driving approximately around the mainland coast would take about 10 days at a guess if you were pushing it, and there's only around 20 million people on it. That's a lot of man hours, cables and equipment to install. So don't expect cheap all-you-can-eat access in Australia yet.

    There are various plans at various rates - one provider offers 512/128 for $70/month with no restrictions, not sure about the cost for higher peaks. I wouldn't look for any vast improvement over this sort of capped plan for at least another 5 years, and that's only assuming the standards don't improve the peak speed even further.

    iiNet have spent $10M on installations, and only have customers numbering in the tens of thousands of dollars. They obviously can't give the service away, but the rates are still reasonable especially compared with the telco offerings. As I understand it, there are still per Mb costs from at least some of our international trunk providers too. Anyone who can refute that, or that has details?

    1. Re:Unfortunately, bandwidth costs in Australia... by Meetch · · Score: 1
      Whoops, did I say tens of thousands of dollars? PEOPLE! DUH!

      Must have misplaced my marbles.

    2. Re:Unfortunately, bandwidth costs in Australia... by xerxesdaphat · · Score: 1

      512/128 is not that impressive atm in Australia. I'm in Brisbane, and tomorrow (Thursday), I upgrade finally from 56k dialup to 1.5k/256 with a 20/20 gig (day/offpeak) cap, for 49.95$ a month. This is with a quite large isp called TPG (it has a very, very poor reputation for customer service but which true geek ever uses customer service heheh?). In my opinion that deal is not bad... although not quite in the league of Europe and Asia.

      --
      The Shoes of the Fisherman's Wife Are Some Jive Ass Slippers
    3. Re:Unfortunately, bandwidth costs in Australia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen. I'm currently on TPG's 1.5/256 (20Gb) plan for $50 a month. It's a great deal... if only it actually hit the speeds promised. The problem is, TPG is either unable, or just to cheap, to find an upstream provider that can handle the metric shittonne of new clients TPG have signed up over the last few months, thinking they were getting a great deal. I could almost count down to the time overseas links start dying or at least running painfully slow each day.

      Added to this, there seems to be issues regarding the connectivity between Perth and Sydney. Major issues, in fact. Even at low usage times, I think the best I generally get is 80KB/sec from overseas. Interstate traffic is also affected, giving me a slightly more respectable 120KB/sec. However, if I download of WAIX (a West Australian network) I pretty much always get 150KB/sec, like I'd expect.

      But hey, if TPG's oversold, it's going to be TPG losing business. I'm already recommending people avoid it and the "Whingepool" TPG forum is full of people saying they'll be looking elsewhere when their contract runs out. I think I'll be joining them, thank god for 6 month contacts!

    4. Re:Unfortunately, bandwidth costs in Australia... by novakreo · · Score: 1

      It's a little bit like the United States here. You can provide for the areas along the coasts where most Australians live, but attempting to expand beyond that means providing more and more infrastructure for not nearly as many people, and therefore much less return on investment.

      Having said that, iiNet's new plans still don't beat cable. I'm paying $60/month for "unlimited" (possible traffic shaping after 10Gb--last month I transferred 30Gb without it) data transfer, unlimited downstream (I've gotten up to 8.5Mbit/s at times) and 128kbit/s upstream.
      For that price with iiNet, it looks like I'll only get 1.5Mbit downstream, and 5Gb peak + 5 Gb off-peak usage. Sure, the upstream is doubled, but that doesn't make up for the reduced downstream and data allowance.

      --
      O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!
    5. Re:Unfortunately, bandwidth costs in Australia... by Solilok · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not quite true; Australia is one of the most urbanized 1st world countries.
      >95% of the population live in the major cities.

      Which is also why they are offering wireless internet (http://www.unwired.com.au/ , http://www.iburst.com.au/ )

    6. Re:Unfortunately, bandwidth costs in Australia... by thogard · · Score: 1

      The only problem with your low density keeping the price up theory is that where Australia is populated, it happens to be at the sweet spot for density for telcom rollout. Sydney and Melbourne both now have more people that Chicago and both cities have a much higher density than most US cities.

      The problem with expensive stuff in Australia is a result of anti-competitive upstream providers and paperwork that is just nasty.

    7. Re:Unfortunately, bandwidth costs in Australia... by OzRoy · · Score: 1

      Actually I believe iiNet are one of the top 5 ISP's with subs well over 150,000. Most of them were aquired through buy outs of other ISP's.

      Their revenue is quite large.

    8. Re:Unfortunately, bandwidth costs in Australia... by NeuroAcid · · Score: 1

      10 days to go around Australia? I think that can be done. I made it from Perth to Sydney in a little over 3 days. It would have been well under 3 if my car didn't break down 5 times and I didn't stop so many times for "entertainment expenses". Anyway, I don't think it would be all that expensive to install these lines on the Aussie continent because everyone lives in urban clusters. Companies would only have to install last mile wiring in a few places, and everywhere in between would be one fat bundle easily laid next to a railroad or something. Part of the problem is in the pricing system these companies have set up. If you live in the middle of nowhere, like many places here in the states, then you should have to pay a lot more for your connection, if not have to pay someone yourself to get the wires laid down. Although I would love to see everyone on a super fast broadband connection, I'm really upset at the attempts by governments and companies trying to make the internet equal for all. Instead of pouring more money into maintaining and upgrading the existing infrastructure in cities and their metro areas, they are spending it to lay a line through a desert so that Uncle Bob Redneck can have a fast connection at his slaughter cabin, um, hunting cabin.

      --
      "I don't need drugs to enjoy this, just to enhance it" - Otto
    9. Re:Unfortunately, bandwidth costs in Australia... by Meetch · · Score: 3, Informative
      Sweet spot? In Sydney and Melbourne, almost certainly. Perth however is 1.2 million or so people spread out over a couple of hundred square kilometres - and that's where iiNet was born. Adelaide's density wouldn't be much higher. Canberra, while designed well from conception is as a result mostly suburban for housing. And that's leaving out a few... submarine trunk to Tasmania anyone?

      I believe many Australians are still dreaming of 180+ square metre homes on quarter acre blocks, and even if they don't get the desired space, that's keeping a large area of the lower density capital cities from building up instead of out.

      Telcos are overcharging us (Telstra has to look after its shareholders after all), but they are also still installing infrastructure. It's fine installing the infrastructure for a city, but running a trunk over 3000km to the next nearest core hub is never going to be a cheap exercise, especially when we still get the cost of backhoe related outages adding to it.

      Plus they have to keep upgrading capacity because people keep demanding more! And getting service to population centres off the beaten track does matter to the customers, and that adds to the cost, which is shared by all, whether we believe it's fair or not.

      I find it refreshing to see ISPs installing their own infrastructure, but the costs are still there. At least call costs have generally come down since privatisation of the telco industry.

      I'm still curious as to whether/how much Australian ISPs are still being charged by upstream (U.S.?) providers for volume. That certainly wouldn't help, though obviously those costs have at least gone down. Anyone?

  49. I am with iiNet and on the new plans by a.koepke · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have just changed to the new plans and am getting about 7mbit connection. Loving the high speeds and the ability to download heaps and still surf the net without noticing.

    There is also an error in the above summary
    The only downside noted by Whirlpool readers is that iiNet is forcing customers to take their long distance phone service as well to get access to the 8Mbit/s speeds

    iiNet are not forcing you to take their long distance phone service, you need to sign up with their complete phone service, not just long distance. My local calls and line rental charges are all through iiNet now, not just long distance.

    --


    (\(\
    (^.^)
    (")")
    *This is the cute bunny virus, please copy this into your sig so it can spread
  50. Re:I don't live in Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Melbourne is COLD!!. one of the few states in australia to have 'snow' *mainly in blue mountains tho.

    Sydney is ok, but is the 'gay' capital of australia.

    Australian Capital Territory has Canberra and all the politicians... nuff said.

    Quensland has great weather but cane toads.

    Northern Territory is HOT but has KAKADU

    Western Australia has Fremantly Harbour and is a magnificent city.

    South Australia is a boring old hole *I live there*

    Tasmania is full of inbreds *jokes*

  51. Banned from IINET by digitalchinky · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was banned from iinet (WA) in 2000 - back when they were 'small time' - the reason: I asked them (politely) not to send me their monthly 'spam' advertising filled with added services and features they were offering. They responded that I was the 'only' one across the entire country that had a problem with this, and that I should just put up with it. Use the delete button.

    I asked them once more not to send junk mail else I would go to the ombudsman. They did, so I fired off email to the ombudsman, got a few telephone calls from Perth, then Canberra, then Sydney - their spam STOPPED.

    So did my account. I was suspended. After a telephone call I was told that I would never be able to connect with them again - I was a problem client apparantly. I was sent overseas so I never had the opportunity to make lots of money from it all.

    Their service is actually quite good though! Or at least it was for me. Connected with iinet in Geraldton Western Australia. Never had any trouble other than that.

    1. Re:Banned from IINET by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      Probably bad form to reply to myself, a similar thing happened with 'WestNet' - wasn't banned though, just told I was annoying for the extra workload their admins had to do in resolving the problem. (I don't like junk mail)

      I think they merged with iinet pretty soon after that.

    2. Re:Banned from IINET by vyXn · · Score: 1

      nah, iinet and westnet are still seperate companies, i doubt we'll ever buy them (but i won't swear on it)... we have our eyes on bigger fish ;)

      --
      s/redundant/redundant
    3. Re:Banned from IINET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grah! Grah! Stop drinking the purple drinks!

    4. Re:Banned from IINET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please see above for definition of 'Anal Retentive'.

      Thank you.

    5. Re:Banned from IINET by satans_advocate · · Score: 1

      Disgruntled Defence Signals Directorate employee, will exchange secrets for diet coke.

      Who DID throw those children overboard?

    6. Re:Banned from IINET by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      Officially I have 'no comment' - unofficially you'd have to discuss it with the sleezy politicians - they were the ones who 'donanted' the 30 extra slabs of VB for the crappy camera shots...

      Wait, I've said too much...

    7. Re:Banned from IINET by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      You were the one who banned me weren't you! :-)

      Good one!

    8. Re:Banned from IINET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So did my account. I was suspended. After a telephone call I was told that I would never be able to connect with them again

      I am really surpised at this, especially with you showing the willingness to take control of your legal rights. I would have thought they would be too scared to kick a user like you off.

      If they did this to me, I would take legal action on principal alone.

    9. Re:Banned from IINET by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      The problem for me was being tied to the Governments every whim - At that time I was working at the ADSCS, 30 kilometers out from Geraldton (DSD field site) - I had already begun talks with the ombudsman representitives in Perth, they directed me to the ACCC, provided lots of good information on legal remidy... Long story short, I haven't been back to Australia for any great length of time since 2000.

      I let it slide - though I did get a few hundred dollars from a hotel in Broome (1998ish) - sending junk mail as well. The legal system works quite good - fast - whenever you 'do' manage to get a good id on the sender (and they are doing it from within Australia)

      I'm not sure if the ombudsman still deal with spam - they did back then though.

      http://www.ombudsman.wa.gov.au/

    10. Re:Banned from IINET by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      I was sent overseas so I never had the opportunity to make lots of money from it all.

      Maybe I'm missing something, but how exactly were you going to make lots of money from having your ISP account terminated?

      Are you suggesting you were going to take them to court and ask for damages? Even in the United States, such a suit would be dismissed almost immediately.

    11. Re:Banned from IINET by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      Figure of speech. Nothing I say here is 'deadly serious' - the only result that I wanted was for the spam to stop - I paid them money for an internet connection - not a direct advertising conduit.

      Wasn't in the terms of contract so why put up with it? The only financial recompence would be to pay for the time spent downloading their crap from the point I asked them to stop. If you couldn't use your phone for a month because the system was dead, would you 'want' to pay them the normal fee?

      That is the key reasoning! Not money.

    12. Re:Banned from IINET by ConnectInterrupt · · Score: 1

      I asked them (politely) not to send me their monthly 'spam' advertising filled with added services and features they were offering. Really? Does this work with hotmail too?

  52. Require LD? by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Funny

    The only downside noted by Whirlpool readers is that iiNet is forcing customers to take their long distance phone service as well to get access to the 8Mbit/s speeds

    I live in the USA. For an 8Mbit/s line, I would not only gladly accept having to use their LD, I would also turn over my liver and owe them some unspecified favor involving dead bodies.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Require LD? by zackeller · · Score: 1

      And have a cap of 40GB/month? That's not even worth a finger.

    2. Re:Require LD? by Jahz · · Score: 1

      Upstream cap ro downstream? I'm assuming upstream since that is what is much more expensive for the ISP. I dont even think 40GB is possible with my Comcast Cable connection (in the USA) with a 256Kb/s upload cap!!!

      That is equal to 30KB MAX upload.

      Lets see... 40,000,000,000 bytes
      30,000 bytes/second
      cancel some zeroes...
      4,000,000/3 = 1,333,333 seconds
      1,333,333 sec / 2,595,000 seconds per month = 0.51
      Thus to reach 40GB upload, I would have to fill my current upstream pipe for 16 full days. I would gladly accept a cap for a bigger pipe! (note: the only service in Boston, USA which gives significantly better upstream costs almost three times as much as my connection)

      --
      There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who do not.
    3. Re:Require LD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Downstream (for some ISPs up & down combined).

      Australian ISPs pay US ISPs for data coming & going, so US traffic is all equally expensive for them.

  53. Re:I don't live in Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why Dont you come up to sunny old Queensland where the temperture is in the mid 30C in Summer and in the low 20C in Winter. Beautiful one day and great for the next

  54. Re:capped to 40GB/month by Zugok · · Score: 1

    I used ot have an unlimited plan in Australia. with TPG. I had 512kb downstream and 128 upstream for AU$79.95 per month. I then gave my connection to a friend when I moved out of Australia and it was too much for her price wise and she'd never use more than 1GB traffic a month.

    --
    "I just can't sit while people are saying nonsense in a meeting without saying it's nonsense" J Watson, Sci Am 288:(4)51
  55. bandwidth (ATM/IP) and a poll by glMatrixMode · · Score: 1

    My ISP says he's offering 20 Mbps, but he's cheating with the difference between ATM and IP bandwidth, so it really isn't serving anyone more than 16 Mbps. Think about that...

    I'd like to start a poll (I hope there isn't some good-manners-principle here on /. that will get me flamed for having started a poll)... so I propose to compare our bandwidth, based on ISP and location. I'm really curious to see what high bandwidth japanese readers can get...

    Please tell your *actual* bandwidth, in Mbps (megabits per second).

    Let's start with me.

    ISP / Location / down / up
    Free / Paris(fr) / 11.5 / 0.85

    --
    War doesn't prove who's right, just who's left.
    1. Re:bandwidth (ATM/IP) and a poll by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Internode / Adelaide (Aus) / 0.5 / 0.1

    2. Re:bandwidth (ATM/IP) and a poll by Eternal197 · · Score: 1

      Telstra / Brisbane(Aus) / 6 / 0.1

    3. Re:bandwidth (ATM/IP) and a poll by ch3 · · Score: 1

      Skynet / Liege (BE) / 4 / 0.256
      soon to be
      Scarlet / Liege (BE) / 3.3 / 0.384

    4. Re:bandwidth (ATM/IP) and a poll by ardiri · · Score: 1

      BBB / Stockholm (SE) / 12 / 9

      no cap limits, all for 399 SEK/month ($57 USD). my bandwidth utilization over a month is well over 1TB per month. capping sucks. if you have speed; you dont want to be restricted as to how much you can download.

    5. Re:bandwidth (ATM/IP) and a poll by thogard · · Score: 1

      A new one/Melb Oz/3.5/1.5

    6. Re:bandwidth (ATM/IP) and a poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dodo/Melbourne(oz)/0.256/0.064

    7. Re:bandwidth (ATM/IP) and a poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OntheNet / Gold Coast (Aus) / 4 / 1

    8. Re:bandwidth (ATM/IP) and a poll by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      Nebula/Helsinki/1/0.5

      Uncapped, 54e/month. It's on the expensive side (I could get 12/1 for the same money), but I like the company. Kick-ass customer-service, static IP-address, running personal servers is A-OK.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    9. Re:bandwidth (ATM/IP) and a poll by sorrydaijin · · Score: 1

      My experience with ISPs has been varied.

      1. NTTwest 1.5Mbps ADSL line with AT&T as ISP / Osaka(jp) / 0.8 / 0.4

      2. NTTwest 8Mbps ADSL line with AT&T as ISP / Osaka(jp) / 1.2 / 0.8

      3. NTTwest 12Mbps ADSL line with AT&T as ISP / Osaka(jp) / 3 / 1.2

      4. NTTwest 100Mbps FTTH line with AT&T as ISP / Osaka(jp) / 20 / 20

      5. JCOM Cable (30/5) with ZAQ as ISP / Osaka(jp) / 20 / 2

      1 and 2 were the same house, which was in a real old part of town and the copper was probably in pretty bad shape.
      The speed was noticeably better when I moved house with a similar service (3) despite the distance to the exchange going from just under 3km to around 4.5km.
      FTTH was disappointing, but I paid about 15USD all up over 3 months thanks to catching a marketing campaign at its peak. I later realized that it was my router limiting the speed so who knows how high it would have actually gone. The FTTH lines are shared do a degree, but nobody on my street has it and considering the average age in my neighborhood is about 70, I doubt there are many heavy users even i they are connected.
      Cable (5) is OK, but speed fluctuates like crazy. Sometimes its 20Mbps, others I am lucky to get a tenth of that.

      My ISP promiscuity will continue as I am about to switch to the "k-opticom" FTTH service offered by the power company. We have so many choices when it comes to broadband that I could probably just switch every few months and coast on the free marketing campaigns.
      Broadband access is one of the things on my long list of reasons not to go back to Australia, but when I first came to Japan in about 1995, we didn't even have Internet access for students in our University. It's amazing how much things can change in just 10 years.

    10. Re:bandwidth (ATM/IP) and a poll by Dance_Dance_Karnov · · Score: 1

      Cox/Gainesville, FL(US)/3.7/.5

  56. As a broadband using Australian by strider44 · · Score: 1

    I'll believe it when I'm using it. "As fast as your line can go" can mean many things, and in my opinion this may last as long as TPG's unlimited 1.5mbit conns.

    However press like this can only be good, even if it is a bit shifty.

  57. Re:I don't live in Australia by Zugok · · Score: 1

    Australia is a BIG country, expect huge variations in temperature. Tasmania is cold as is Melbourne and you'll freeze your balls off. I went to Melbourne during their winter in 2002. Dull dull dull. I moved to Brisbane in September 2002, their spring, and it was hot. In fact it is almost summer clothing all year round. If wear a sombrero in Cairns during Spring, you may look out of place, but it's a smart move. To be fair, even Melbourne summers can reach 35 deg C.

    --
    "I just can't sit while people are saying nonsense in a meeting without saying it's nonsense" J Watson, Sci Am 288:(4)51
  58. Capping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm in Australia, and currently on a 128k iSDN account, unless I fork out extra cash on Satelite, I can't get anything better.

    When Broadband comes available to me...if it does, I will not upgrade until the capping of downloading limit is gone. I have 128k unlimited, and I chew 30-35gb a month alone for only $40. What's the point of paying $100 a month for a download limit that is usually much less than what I do?

    You can get unlimited, but it's hard to find, and usually the company quickly changes there plans after too many people sign up.

    1. Re:Capping by Eternal197 · · Score: 1

      The most annoying thing about broadband in Australia is the capping of Telstra's cable 'unlimited' accounts after 10GB.

      I mean, they're unlimited but who's not going to get annoyed downloading at 128k after having most of the month at 6mbps.

      One good thing though is that Telstra's people are lazy so I usually can get up to 20-30GB before capping.

  59. Got datacap? by yem · · Score: 1

    ?

    I don't see any .au ISP supporting unlimited 8mbps let alone 20.

    --
    No, I did not read the f***ing article!
    1. Re:Got datacap? by a.koepke · · Score: 1

      I don't see any .au ISP supporting unlimited 8mbps let alone 20.

      They don't offer unlimited, I have a 10GB limit.

      By saying "download heaps" I mean have say iiNet's internet radio service running and downloading a few files at high speed while browsing.

      Their heavy plan has 80GB limit which would be enough for most people I would imagine and still is a good price.

      --


      (\(\
      (^.^)
      (")")
      *This is the cute bunny virus, please copy this into your sig so it can spread
    2. Re:Got datacap? by yem · · Score: 1

      Thanks - yeah 80Gb IS plenty in my opinion. And I am a heavy user. I pull a lot of content from archive.org. I'm hoping someone puts together an 80Gb plan here in .nz when 2mbps becomes available in March.

      --
      No, I did not read the f***ing article!
  60. Sure, nice speed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    too bad all the cool stuff is on the other side of the big pond, and australia is connected to it over an ISDN line.

  61. Don't Get upset I am Australian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can only get dialup.

    Yep I am to far away from the exchange to get Adsl.

    I need the wifi network rollout or even better Adsl 2. Adsl 2 most likely will not be upto the job to far ie 750 metres more will not help.

  62. Re:capped to 40GB/month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, well most people won't be downloading constantly, and if you are, then they won't want you as a customer. International bandwidth is still expensive here in Australia, in fact until recently we had to pay for all traffic both ways between here and the US.

    If the plans are made unlimited then the ISP will go bankrupt from the traffic fees.

  63. Illiteracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's "you're", not "your", when you mean "you are".

  64. Re:Is it just me by matteo_v · · Score: 1

    Well, in Italy we have this ISP Fastweb who gives us a 10 Mb/s connection. I have fiber right up to my desk! I found it *does* work up to nearly 900Kb/s when connecting to a fast site, even overseas. For instance, when downloading from Microsoft or Adobe.

    The downside is that we Fastweb users are behind a NAT firewall, and can't accept incoming network connections. Unless you pay quite a bit more...

    --
    -- http://matteo.vaccari.name/
  65. Availability by cybathug · · Score: 0

    As most people have said, one of the big problems with Austrlian broadband is its availability (Or much lack thereof). Without getting into the headaches outback people must have, I live in a suburb just outside of Brisbane and can't get cable OR ADSL - I'm stuck on 128k up/down ISDN (Only 64k when the phone is being used).

    Before we moved about 6 months ago we were on the several megabit cable, when we called Optus (Our ISP at the time) they told us that we couldn't get cable at our new place (Underground power lines and the companies are too lazy to put the cable tv/internet underground) but we could get ADSL.

    After we moved we put in an order for ADSL, then a few days later got a call telling us that they didn't realise our estate was on pair gain and couldn't get ADSL either - oops. Note that this is AFTER we moved - so we switched to Telstra and now have the aforementioned ISDN connection. It makes me sad.

  66. Situation in France by Seb+C. · · Score: 2, Informative

    In case anyone wonder, and since we did not have a slashdot article to promote this (but i don't care anyway), the frenchies can get an ADSL2+ (20Mb/s max), unlimited phone calls (mobile call for .19 cents () a minute -charged by second from the 1st second-) and TV through ADSL (when your close enough of the DSLAM) for 30 a month.
    Sure, the country is not as wide as Australia (people are more concentrated), and only half the population is covered (others can get a 512k. the providers should yet reach 80% of the population by the end of 2005), but the broadband is getting quite common here.
    For those who wonder, i'm 5km from the DSLAM, got a 61dB loss on my line, and still get 1,5kb down and 1kb up (phone service running fine, but no Tv)

    1. Re:Situation in France by TruthSeeker · · Score: 1

      Besides, you can get 20Mbps (ok, it's a lot more expensive, 60 euros/month) through cable.

      --
      I sense much beer in you. Beer leads to intoxication, intoxication leads to hangover. Hangover leads to sobering.
    2. Re:Situation in France by AwaxSlashdot · · Score: 0

      In France too and propably using the same provider : I'm 2191 meters away from the DSLAM, with 24 dB loss and I have 11Mbps DL, 1.1Mbps UP, phone, TV over DSL and this for 30E/months.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  67. ADSL 2+ is already available ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ADSL 2+ is already available... in France for 29 Euros/month ...plus TV over ADSL + free phone service (http://adsl.free.fr/)

  68. Dont get your hopes up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two major problems they face, the first is lack of capital for infustructure development. You'd be lucky to find them with equipment in your local exchange.
    The second problem is telstra has a lot deeper pockets than they do for price wars. If they are seen as a threat telstra could raise its caps or lower its pricing and remove them from the market without actually having to invest in faster lines.

    1. Re:Dont get your hopes up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not quite that easy for Telstra. They provide whole sale ADSL lines to all ISPs in australia (including iinet) and if they lower their prices
      they would go lower than the wholesale price, and a lot of ISPs would talk to the ACCC and get them slapped on the arse again.

    2. Re:Dont get your hopes up by urbaer · · Score: 1

      You'd be lucky to find them with equipment in your local exchange.

      Unless you're in WA or in the inner part of the city. There's around 30 in the other states and heaps in WA. But I'm sure they'll keep rolling out.

    3. Re:Dont get your hopes up by swherdman · · Score: 1

      Knowing my luck i wont put one in my eachange. According to some isp i was looking at the other day (iprimus) i think i am withing the range of my exchange to get the full spead out of it. Ill move my router out into the pit infrount of my house if it would increase my speed. but knowing my luck it wont be happening to me soon. On another note because one isp is starting it, all other isp's will have to eventually aswell or risk being left out so other isp's will start doing it soon. Telstra could gain the upper hand by burrying applications for dslam instlations and quieltley installing them as fast as possable beting the compertition to the market. Now would some isp please install a dslam on the CASTLE HILL exchange and ill be happy. Now at 8 up and 1 down. would be enoug to run a few more servers off my connection. Wonder if this will lead to drops in the cost of prices of hosting for games websites etc.

  69. Re:how about sweden already having 24mbit ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as they say, technology is pushed foward by pr0n ;-)

  70. Optimum Online [!] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from Cablevision in NYC has been rated at 10MBit/s for a few years now ($50 a month), which has enabled me to download literally a TB (or close to it) of movies/p0rn/software. :)

  71. Upload still 256k!!! by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    Once again overlooked! We all need upload after getting bored of p2p!

    http://www.iinet.net.au/broadband/

    256k is useless to me. I don't even need 2mbit download.

    What would be perfect would be a cheaper connection at say,

    - maybe half the price
    - maybe even only 256down
    - but 1mbit up

    1. Re:Upload still 256k!!! by vyXn · · Score: 1

      read the page a little closer. If you bundle, you get up to 8mbps downstream, and 1mbps upstream :)

      --
      s/redundant/redundant
    2. Re:Upload still 256k!!! by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      I always thought that any one connection required a minimum upload speed to be able to ack enough packets to reach its full speed. Anyone know what upload is required to reach 8mbit?

  72. Re:proof? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any proof for this claim. Remember Australia has UK style libel laws.

  73. Re:I don't live in Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its 42c out in the sticks here in W.A here.
    Perth is a good city ..i think

  74. Re:error in article summary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have to sign up with their iiPhone bundle for the faster speeds.

    iiPhone consists of:
    line rental
    local, long distance, mobile and international calls.

    These plans haven't been meet with much enthusiasm as only a very small number of users can achieve above 1536/256 (iiSlam users), and unless your ADSL phone line is only used for ADSL most people are worse off then on other providers, due to the iiPhone call charges.

    8Mb ADSL is nothing new, iPrimus has been offering it for quite some time, and they have much greater DSLAM coverage.

  75. ACT Australia Netspace by Hyperhaplo · · Score: 0
    ISP / Location / down / up<br>
    Free / Paris(fr) / 11.5 / 0.85<br>
    Netspace / Canberra(au) / 512k / 126k <br>
    --
    You have a sick, twisted mind. Please subscribe me to your newsletter.
  76. .. I just upgraded by Archon-X · · Score: 1

    Took 3 minutes, and my account can max out on 7.7MBit.

    Nice work, finally!

  77. Re:I don't live in Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Melbourne has been described as having 4 seasons a day. Large temperature and weather shifts are relatively common. (It can go from sunny/cold -> storm/cold -> humid/cold -> sunny/hot).
    It can be a challenge to dress appropriately.

  78. Re:I don't live in Australia by bergerdml · · Score: 1

    Melbourne can get VERY hot. I have been here for 3 summers now, and each year we've had a few days that hit 42-44C. I am from New York/Boston originally. There is a saying in New England that if you don't like the weather, wait a minute. Well, this is so much more true for Melbourne than it is for New England. We have something called the "cold change" here. A shift in the wind can come and the temperature can drop 10-15 degrees C in 30 minutes. Its amazing. Melbourne is a fantastic city. I absolutely adore it and you are very lucky to be moving down here.

  79. I live in Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Peak at 27?

    You wish. Try 37.

    Stinking hot one day, pissing down the next. Thats Melbourne.

  80. This sounds like good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being someone who is too far from an exchange to get ADSL under the current system, the promise of extra range is good for me! 56k barely cuts it now-days, and with four other Internet users, it's useless for anything but Instant Messaging! Hopefully they will enable all the exchanges in Melbourne, and we can get ADSL2+ on it.

  81. Re:I don't live in Australia by Aussie · · Score: 1

    where the temperture is in the mid 30C in Summer

    and the humidity is 99.9%, don't forget that. It can be really uncomfortable if you are not used to it, like me.

  82. Static Ip Not Required - www.no-ip.com by Hyperhaplo · · Score: 0
    Static IP?

    Why not use http://www.no-ip.com/ or dyndns?

    --
    You have a sick, twisted mind. Please subscribe me to your newsletter.
    1. Re:Static Ip Not Required - www.no-ip.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats great for
      username.no-ip.com
      but what about mheydon.net (i host the ns and mx)

  83. No WAIX by pnevin · · Score: 1

    According to the article, people using the service no longer have free access to the local peering service amongst the WA Internet community, i.e. where downloading that linux ISO on your iinet account from 3FL (on Westnet) wouldn't contribute to your monthly usage for the cap before, it does on this new account.

    So you get faster speeds, but can download less before the cap kicks in. Plus, you have to take their phone service. Blah.

    1. Re:No WAIX by houseofzeus · · Score: 0

      A lot of the plans have had their download limits upped for this reason. Although free PIPE traffic was nice I really doubt anyone was getting so much out of it they wouldn't take the added speed instead.

  84. Re:I don't live in Australia by Tuross · · Score: 1

    A phrase you'll soon become familiar with is "Four seasons in one day". This is Melbourne.

    Summers can get over 40C in some parts. You don't want to know about windchill. I thought Canberra was bad (with a direct path from the Snowy Mountains) but that's nothing like an antarctic blast that can hit any southern town. And being in Melbourne, you can be standing in nice warm sunny little bourke street and a few seconds later its freezing and about to bucket down. But Melbourne is a very nice city, I love visiting it, and I'd consider moving there if they played real football *wink*

    --
    Matt
    1. Read Slashdot
    2. ???
    3. Profit
  85. Re:proof? by Exter-C · · Score: 1

    Its simple maths. iinet often attracts higher users than many other ISPs because of thier high speed pipes. The usage of the traffic / quota isnt that high compared to many other ISPs but the PIPES around australia still cost a fortune leased line, dedicated ATM/WDM etc all costs alot of cash because of the huge distances that are covered to get around the country for the small amount of population.

  86. Take the speed with a grain of salt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having just spent two days testing DSLAM equipment and various consumer CPE at a laboratory in Sydney, I can say with great certainty that the majority of people will be lucky to get ADSL1 speeds on their ADSL2/2+ connections. Unless you live 2km or closer to an exchange, 8Mb/1Mb max speeds are what you will get. Oh, and make sure you use decent CPE. The cheaper brands often completely fail to sync at higher speeds or distances.

  87. Its great, but... by Alleyoopsoyale · · Score: 0

    I was originally on a 256/64 plan for $49 a month. i then tried the "feel the speed offer" of 1500/256. That trial plan was upgraded, due to the rolling out of their DSLAM. I was told that I could change back to my old plan after the trial period, and keep paying $50. The main reason I dont want to get one of their new plans, is the fact that they have turned off free peering. This is a bummer for me, as most of my downloads come from WAIX (Western Australian Internet Exchange). The other problem with the new plans is that you dont get the full speed unless you bundle your phone line with your DSL. I used to get a $10 discount on my monthly bill for having iinet as my long distance and mobile call carrier from my land line. Now you need to have the full package with them in order to receive the discount. I mean I'll probably get one of the new plans, but I'm kinda pissed that my "free" downloads are gone.

  88. Somewhat similar with Stanaphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Just a couple of weeks ago, I had a somehow similar experience with this VoIP company called Stanaphone. After I asked them to stop spamming me, with no answer from them, I requested to have my user account removed. They just ignored my messages. Then I posted a message into their forums saying that they were violating their own Privacy Policy. They systematically removed my postings, until they decided to ban my IP address so that I could no longer post.

    Very sad and totally unprofessional for them.

    I guess they are trying to accept the lost of customers that are running towards Skype.

  89. Australia != Internet Friendly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I somehow have gotten the impression that the AUS Government is very computer hostile unless it is at the behest of large corporations or pressure groups, could anyone living in AUS give the low-down on some of the problems that plague internet users there?

    1. Re:Australia != Internet Friendly? by urbaer · · Score: 1

      I somehow have gotten the impression that the AUS Government is very computer hostile unless it is at the behest of large corporations or pressure groups, could anyone living in AUS give the low-down on some of the problems that plague internet users there?
      Sort of right. See the goverment used to own this company called Telecom which provided telecommunications. No one else could, the goverment owned all of the phone lines in the country. Which worked ok.

      The goverment finally let other carriers in and in 1992 Optus launched in Australia. In 1997 the goverment sold (I think) 25% of Telecom (now called Telstra) and in 1998 sold enough to give the goverment 51% control (A Brief History of Telstra).

      Which is where we are now. Basically Telstra owns most of the lines (because they were paid for by the Australian people) and it costs a fair bit for anyone else to roll out an entire network. But Telstra obviously set the retail and wholesale prices of the lines. And strangely, sometimes, the wholesale prices are more than or equal to the retail. Optus gets around this via thier TV cable services, Alphalink rolled out wireless and iiNet are doing what article says.

      There were claims that Telstra blocked the introduction of broadband for it's own benifit and that it has been unfairly competing against other carriers (but I don't think Fair Trade has upheld any of these claims).

      In reality the goverement is pushing to sell the rest of Telstra and the Coalition have never quite got enough votes in the Senate to get it thru by themselves. For the last two sales they mad stupid ammendments to appease an independent who calls himself Brian Harradine, who's very into censoring everything, including the net. Thankfully he's going, but Family First managed to get one senator in (and I'm ashamed that it's in my state) and they are a party who... shock horror... want to ramp up net censorship further than what Harradine dreamed he could get.

      So the simple answer is it's not that the goverment are actively computer hostile, it's just that thier short sighted plan of selling a monopoly means that they have to be mean to all of us.

      I think I might have ranted a bit there, but you should get the general impression of what's happening down here. Oh... and do a search on google for Telstra suck if you need more of an idea... :)

  90. This sounds dodgy to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Upto 8mb/s down WITH bundled VOIP.

    Hmmm, looked at the pricing of the iinet voip plans - pretty crappy considering its a voip phone.

    Sounds to me like they are giving you 8mb to IINET so the voip works without shaping for home users and maybe they give you 8mb for webpages you pull from their proxy but I can't see them giving everyone 8mb/s international. Imaging 100 monkeys with bittorrent at full speed..... the international links would be totally saturated.

    I smell a rat!

  91. Re:TV Commercials in US? As a CLEC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a CLEC, it's all about the footage. Unless the clec is willing to spend thousands on putting a dslam in your area, which won't hapen unless then dollars make sense, you're looking at the availability from the c.o.

    Or maybe a clec will come along and dump thousands on putting a dslam in your area. Or not.

    Agreed that the commercials are probably aimed at killing off the only breed of competition local telco service can ask for.

    The FCC is reversing 1995 acts. The ILECs have more cash than us. *shrug*. What can we do, except die off gracefully.

  92. Switzerland by file-exists-p · · Score: 1

    I was until recently a french citizen and basically left the country when they started to put 8Mb DSL everywhere (they are now deploying ADSL2+ which goes up to 20Mbs).

    So I am now in Switzerland. Beautiful country. However, the bandwith situation is pretty bad: 786kbs up / 128kbs down dsl for a monthly cost of 32 euros (US$42).

    Basically it seems that the historic operator (Swisscom) controls the lines and there is no competition. The situation was the same 4 years ago in France, until under the pressure of both Europe and a governmental agency (the ART) real comptetion could emerge.

    --
    Go Debian!

  93. Re:Not so lucky by MobileC · · Score: 1

    Lucky sods.

    You've got a pair of cans.

    --

    Fran
    :):):)
    1st 1st Poster of the new Millennium!

  94. The 'quota' might suck... by Devar · · Score: 1

    .. but I'm addicted to the speed already. I switched over last night from a 1.5mbps plan last night, and as my exchange has had iiDSLAMS in it for a while, I'm able to get some _real_ broadband speeds now. I can't quite believe how fast it is.
    iiNet should be congratulated for dragging the rest of Australia's Telco industry kicking and screaming into the modern day of broadband.

    --
    It's a Bagel.
  95. In france you can have this too .. and more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In france we can get full uncapped ADSL2+ (that's about 20 mbit/s down) with unlimited national phone calls and TV over DSL for less than 30 / month ... check it out here : free.fr.

    It's been some time this has been available ant I didn't see any story on the slashdot frontpage about this ...

  96. Not just for Internet Access ... by AwaxSlashdot · · Score: 0

    in France, we have switched to ADSL2+ last november and had uncapped ADSL connection for at least 1.5 year now.
    Yes 6Mbps (at that time) is truly way above what the net can provide you, even using P2P networks (I managed once to DL debian ISO @ 600kBps).
    But the TRUE meaning of the oversized connection is for added value services :
    - internet access
    - phone (1 or more lines)
    - TV over DSL with :
    * video on demand
    * TVHD

    French currently most active ISP (http://www.free.fr) can provide up to 16 000 channels thru its network, reaching 500k customers.

    For TV ovr DSL, there is no data travelling on the internet because the video feeds are dispatched only to the DSLAM and there multicasted to the client. Only the currently viewed channel is feeded to the client.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  97. Wait a second... by __aailob1448 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this mean that our aussie friends won't be able to complain anymore?

    No more "you americans whine about your crappy broadband but here in australia, we won't get internet for another 30 years" ?

    Thank god.

    1. Re:Wait a second... by aussie_a · · Score: 3, Funny

      Didn't they tell you? We have to use the postal service to get those speeds. Sure we might get a lot of bandwidth, but the latency is shit.

  98. Re:capped to 40GB/month by trelie · · Score: 1

    In Sweden there is rarely a hard cap on allowed up/down traffic. If you generate insane amounts of traffic you might get a letter saying something along the lines of "please stop abusing our generosity" or something like that. A 24/1 *DSL line costs around $50/month. If your house is connected to a fairly widespread fiber network (widespread atleast in the larger cities) you can get a 10/10 connection for $50 or a 100/100 connection for like $80.

  99. Re:I don't live in Australia by scullee · · Score: 1

    And the whole state is as mad as a bad full of cut snakes. Its weird what happens when too many old people move to one place.

  100. 10mbit connection... and signing up for long dist. by tod_miller · · Score: 1

    Sure, I'll sign, can anyone spell VOIP? ... ...

    You have a 10mbit connection, sue you can sign up for thier long distance, and then make all you own VOIP calls. Heck use Skype. The real problem is many companies are geared up to make money off providing packet switched network telephony, but every man and his dog can easily use free voice (voice to landline is like 2 cents a minute intl. over Internet)

    That is like saying, we will give you this hydrogen car for free, but you must buy your petrol from us (that is gasoline for the lexically challenged)

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  101. Re:Not so lucky by Yoda's+Mum · · Score: 1

    Bullshit. This is extremely newsworthy. 80gb/month is MASSIVE for Australia, particularly at that speed. Do you actually live in Australia, or do you just have some half-arsed idea of what Australia's actually like?

  102. Re:capped to 40GB/month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    40GB is more than enough for most mortal uses.
    And 640K is all we'll ever need.
    Hell, applications exist now that can take advantage of that much data (videoconferencing, MMORPG's, etc). Nevermind the fact that at 8Mb/s, that 40 grand is gone in less than half a day.
    As an Australian broadband customer, I find it baffling that people like yourself excuse these companies, by derisively referring to people who actually *use* their services 'leechers'.
    The broadband market in Australia is catching up, but blaming consumers for taking advantage of it's benefits is sheer arrogance. Increased download capacity is as legitimate a concern as speed, yet some people seem to wet themselves with guilt over it.
  103. 20Mbit Soon by demon_2k · · Score: 1

    Although I'm reasonably happy with both telcos services (Telstra and Optus). I welcome more competition. I feel that Australia is a bit slow on improving their communication networks because of the cost of running cables on the street per signups. And Australian cities are not very dense, which means a lot of cables. I hope that a little extra competition will not only lower prices but also force telcos to compete for areas where their broadband is not yet available.

  104. Re:capped to 40GB/month by thogard · · Score: 1

    This rumor?
    No, a tier 1 telco won't pay for bandwidth. They pay for ports in an exchange and that port cost is a fraction of the very expensive router they get to use. The cables between the US and Australia carry the same number of bits every second if they are all zeros or warez. The problem is most Aussie telcos think they are tier one when they are 2 or even 3.

    I have an unlimited plan (it cost me over 1 grand a month) but I can pump hundreds of gigs over it every month. I fought with every telco offering service until a few gave in. It can be done but its getting cheaper and cheaper.

  105. Re:proof? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A general comment is fine, but you (whether literal or not) stated that iiNet couldn't handle 100 users at 8Mb. Which they certainly can, seeing as how they have thousands of users on 1.5Mb.

    Over-subscription is the norm for the industry, it all depends on how well the ISP manages and upgraded their bandwidth where necessary, and so far there is no evidence that iiNet are not managing bandwidth properly.

  106. italy by kipple · · Score: 1

    well, for the same price in Italy you'd get a 640!

    (to say in a low voice: 640.. KB/sec... damn...)

    will work for bandwidth. (c)

    --
    -- There are two kind of sysadmins: Paranoids and Losers. (adapted from D. Bach)
  107. broadband2 not worth it by POds · · Score: 1

    I'm on an iinet, 256kbps down and 64kbps up plan. I get, 12G peak and 12G off peak downloads which it is caped at. Once peak or offpeak download limit/cap is breached, downloads are slowed to 72kbps, for that zone (peak or offpeak) expect for downloads that are from the PIPE Networks servers or iinet servers or other ISP related to iinet in some way.

    I pay 40 dollars for this plan. Yes, i have iiphone packaged with it which means i get $10 dollars off the original price of $50.

    For a similar price, this is what i get with broadband2.

    The starter plan, with iiphone
    1500 up to 8000 - down
    256 up to 1000 - up
    2GB peak + 2GB offpeak
    $39.95

    As you can see, SIGNIFICANT decrese in downloads just doesnt cut it. However, a friend of mine who had a 512Kbps down and 256kbps up plan without iiphone would do well to get the 1500 to 8000kbps up with iiphone and 10G downloads each way for the same price.

    Also, peering dosenot happen on broadband2 apparantly. So there are NO free downloads from pipenetworks and possibly other iinet users, so what you are getting for the same price is significantly LESS if you use these services, which i would think all iinet users would!!!

    And i suggest, if you only download 2G or 4G a month, do you really need broadband? Wouldnt dialup be just as good?

    --


    Giving IE users a taste of their own medicine since 2005 - http://pods.-is-a-geek.net/
    1. Re:broadband2 not worth it by noisymime · · Score: 1

      You make a damn good point about the loss of peering. I would have just assumed it was there on broadband2 but apparently not

      You're last comment however I find a little strange. Have you been on broadband for a while and forgotten what dial up is like? I know a lot of people who are on broadband and may only go through 800mb or so a month but would gladly kill their own grandmother before going back to dialup. Browsing is actually painful on dialup and with broadband prices the way they are its pointless signing up with dialup these days!

    2. Re:broadband2 not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Westnet gets it though, i'm on 512/128k with 30gb-30gb and my friend is on 1500/256 with 40gb-40gb. (albiet it $90 for me and $140 for him). Also when we run over the cap we can either pay 10$ a gb or have "shaping" (aka be reduced to dialup speeds but not pay anything - and by default it's on Shaping).

      excuse my crap writing, but this was hurried.

  108. Re:I don't live in Australia by POds · · Score: 1

    I live in melbourne and have done so for the last 11 months. You hear from other areas of australia that melbourne can have 4 season in one day. You dont actualy realise how true it is until you live here.

    Not as an example of the above, but to give an example of what summers are like here. Yesterday, it was around 35 degrees celceus. Infact, that would have been the average for the last week. Late yesterday sometime it started raining.

    *looks out the window*

    Fuck!!! Its still raining.

    This is the first time it has consistantly rained in melbourne for a day, since i've been here.

    As for humidity, melbourne doesnt get a lot of it, but we've had a few days where it was very shitty hot, muggy, sloppy weather. But nothing like NSW or god forbid, QLD!

    I advice, find yourself a very cheap heater for winter, unless you like covering yourself in your doona's or blankets you'll be ripping of your bed! Winter is freezing, but prolly not as cold as it would get in most places of America. But for good old OZ Melbourne is as bout as cold it would get. (minus alps/canberra and tassy/and the deserts during the night).

    --


    Giving IE users a taste of their own medicine since 2005 - http://pods.-is-a-geek.net/
  109. 10Mbit/s and 100Mbit/s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Im living in Sweden, and got 10Mbit/s for about 40$/month, for 60$ I could get 100Mbit/s.. but I ready do not see what for.

  110. Puh Lease! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the U.S. Comcast is giving 4M down, 512K up for $40/month. There is no "stated" download limit, although rumor says there is a 60G/month download limit.

    That sounds a lot cheaper than this plan!

    I'm watching in anticipation as Verizon is doing FTTP outside my house and down the road for the last 2 weeks. That means within 6 months, I'll have fiber right to my house. Those speeds *start* at 10M down and go up from there.

    The biggest problem that I see is that even at 4M/second, its only really good for Usenet access and the occaisional ISO (I'm getting Solaris 10 right now).

    For most people? 1Mb/s would be fine. Me? I'll take as much as they give me and use every bit of it.

    Nationally, the issue is population density; I can't see this kind of thing ever being profitable in the middle of wyoming, and the costs would be unbelievable.

    Which is probably the issue for Australia. The country is huge.

  111. Re:capped to 40GB/month by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
    We have better things to do with our time than spend all day, every day downloading DVDs we'll never watch. 40GB is more than enough for most mortal uses.

    Then why on earth would you need 8Mbits/sec if in reality it's capped at 40GB to give a "real world" speed of 128Kb/s? If you don't download a large amount of data then 1.5Mbits/sec or even 384Kb/sec is more than enough for checking mail or browsing the web. The only reason fast broadband took off is the large scale software, music, and movie piracy that is going on with a silent wink and a nod from our ISPs.

  112. Re:I don't live in Australia by microbrewer · · Score: 1

    Im an Aussie that lives in Vermont USA and it gets colder than a witches tit here .At the moment we are having balmy wather during the day of 0 to 5 degress C (32-40F) .A few weeks ago it was -30C so give me a cold Aussie winter any day .
    One big difference is the humidity wet damp cold makes you feel colder than frozen snow type cold as most of the moisture is traped.That said we get temps into the 30s-40s (90-100f) in summer and a average day time temp of 25 but the stday starts of about 5-10 degrees c Ill take that any day then 3 days of heatwave weather in Sydney.

  113. 20Mb/s by fireman+sam · · Score: 1

    Tell that to the poor people who live in the newer estates (est 1996) with RIMs in the ground. Telstra, who owns them, refuse to replace them unless enough people that are effected (affected?) by a RIM request to be removed from it. I have been in three houses in the last 4 years, each one I was stuck on a RIM.

    The biggest problem is that all these suburbs have some copper so it is impossible to determine before you move in if your phone line will be on a RIM or on copper. Before moving into my current house I checked with Telstra if there was any copper available that could go to my house; There was 4 lines. Three weeks later when I moved in I was put on a RIM. I requested that I be put on copper, but according to Telstra, all the copper was used, but they would gladly put in a second phone line and install ISDN for only $120 per month.

    In conclusion. I called my local member, called Telstra again and told them that I have "gone to the press about it" and a day later I get a phone call from Telstra stating that "your phone line has been placed on copper and I should have no problems connecting Telstra broadband". I thanked them for the connection and then went with a MUCH cheaper ISP.

    --
    it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
  114. In Japan we have 50Mbps (and the same problem) by MochaMan · · Score: 1

    Yahoo BB here in Japan offers ADSL in a variety of flavours from 8Mbps (¥3000-ish/mo) on the slow side to 50Mbps (¥4000-ish/mo) on the fast side, which is great for using sites within the country, but for outside of Japan connection overseas is the limiting factor, so you really don't get 50. You do have bandwidth galore for downloads though.

  115. Download limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I think many of the posters here are forgetting is that these plans have download limits. You can see them for yourself at http://www.iinet.net.au/broadband/, but the $29.95 plan comes with a ridiculous 500mb per month.

    Also, it is not just long distance calls, but your entire telephone service. Their telephone service can be significantly more expensive than the many other options in the market, including Telstra which is known for its poor value.

  116. ADSL2 in Iceland by akarnid · · Score: 1

    Hmm, nothing new here for me. We here in Iceland have had this since November. Even tho it was a new company, not affiliated in any way with the incumbent state telco, nor their wireless/cellular competitor. Same rates, 8Mbit/12Mbit/20Mbit,and no capping (or so they say). No need to purchase any other services either, but their routers (Zyxel) come locked and if you want to forward ports and stuff like that, then you will have to call their tech support staff.

  117. Optimum Online by Scyber · · Score: 1

    Cablevision's cable modem offering is rated at 10mb/s download and 1mb/s upload for ~$45/month. Granted if you use too much upload bandwith they may cap your connection at a lower speed. But as long as you are reasonable, it won't happen.

  118. its tasty by wigam · · Score: 0

    I must say 1Mb upload makes your torrents fly in.

  119. Singapore goes to 6.5 Mbps for residential by nguyenht · · Score: 1

    My home Cable Broadband Supplier here in Singapore just upgraded me automatically from 3 Mbps to 6.5 Mbps. http://www.starhub.com/online/maxonline/index.html

    However, I am not sure how fast I can really fly since the underwater cable and satellite connectivity between Singapore and the Rest of the World is still limited.

  120. In the US - Adelphia's "new" plan by dpilot · · Score: 1

    The other day I got an offer to sign up for "premium" broadband internet, with somewhat higher bandwidth than I'm getting now, and of course a higher fee. I don't know what my "guaranteed" bandwidth is, but now I'm waiting for it to get capped.

    OTOH, DSL just became available to me.
    Adelphia or Verizon?
    Freddie or Jason?
    Abbot or Costello?

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  121. upgrades again?! by noisymime · · Score: 1

    is it just me or do iiNet really seem to be treating their customers well of late? I have NEVER been a subscriber to a service that significantly and proactively upgrades their offering 3 times in a year without raising prices. Somehow I can't see the telcos doing this.

    Also has anyone seen the ads Telstra are currently running in Victoria stating that ALL Victorians now have access to broadband? I don't mean to be sceptical but this is an outright lie! I know people who live about 20 minutes from myself who can't get cable or adsl yet they still have the gaul to make statements like this.

  122. Re:TV Commercials in US? As a CLEC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please explain:

    What is ILEC?

    What is CLEC?

    What is footage? (i always assumed that was photographic/filmed material but apparently it can be other stuff as well)

    What is DSLAM?

    What is C.O?

    What 1995 act is the FCC reversing?

    Sorry for these questions, but it appeared as if you were just throwing obscure abbreviations around randomly.

  123. What's news? by Sithgunner · · Score: 1

    Why is it so big news to just have 20Mb line in Australia?

    It's been like that for quite a while in Japan and Japan provides faster lines at very reasonable price, like FTTH (100Mbps)

    The line may be slow to overseas, because they have the bottleneck, but it does make concurrent sessions run very smoothly (like load many webpages, download multiple files at once etc)

  124. My personal favorite... by TheCaptain · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    was when he was called out for lying by another editor.

    Seriously...how could they keep someone that asinine unethical around this long?

    It did warm my heart after Katz vanished after the whole "Junis in Afghanistan" thing though - that was fricking brilliant. It's sad that he had to screw up that badly to get canned though.

  125. Murky distinctions by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    "very large contingent of immature young kids who love to jump on the groupthink bandwagon, and a very large group of gun-loving Red-Blooded 'Merkans who love their Country"

    Those are the same people you're talking about. Often united in their love to hate Michael. Too bad their country exists only in their mind.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Murky distinctions by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Anonymous zombie Coward, you don't even know what "bigotry" means, except that you get the feeling that it's an insult. What's bigoted about my post? Judging a self-selecting group of people on their explicitly defining characteristic is what we adults do, when we're not wallowing in denial. Watch and learn.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  126. Islands in the Net by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    What's the bandwidth of Australia's Internet connections to the rest of the world? I remember when .au meant something like 5Mbps total for the entire country, only about 10 years ago. If Australians are getting 20Mbps each, how is that reflected in their connection to the rest of the Net?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  127. Six months from now: by raynet11 · · Score: 1

    You know what this really means?
    Slashdot headline:
    "Australian boffins clobbering porn servers with 8mb download speeds, hardware sales skyrocket, as smut peddlers struggle to keep up.."

  128. Re:capped to 40GB/month by fabs64 · · Score: 1

    bloody hell, obviously it's so that when we do want the odd movie, we can get it quicker, jesus.

  129. Uh.... big deal. by doppleganger871 · · Score: 0

    Roadrunner just upped their bandwidth to somewhere over 5mbit. Peaked higher than that recently, too.

  130. 50Mbits for $40 in Japan by celorfin · · Score: 1

    I went visit my girlfriend's family in Japan last month. They have 12M ADSL in their house for about $35 per month(Wireless AP included). And for $5 more you get a 50M ADSL line. That's heaven right there.

  131. Re:capped to 40GB/month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure. I only gave up my 300 baud modem because I wanted to be a pirate.

  132. Somalia has higher speed internet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    In Somalia, a poor country that has not had a functional national government since 1991, very high speed internet is available.
    Manager Abdulkadir Hassan Ahmed says that within 1.5km of central Mogadishu, customers - mostly internet cafes - can enjoy service at 150Mb/second through a Long Reach Ethernet. Elsewhere, they can have a wireless connection at 11Mb/s.
    You can also get a phone line installed faster than most Western countries.
    It takes just three days for a landline to be installed - compared with waiting-lists of many years in neighbouring Kenya, where there is a stable, democratic government.
  133. Leading the Horse by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    iiNet is forcing customers to take their long distance phone service as well to get access to the 8Mbit/s speeds

    They can make you take their service, but they can't make you use it. If the prices are too high, get a phone card for cheap calls. What can they do? Cut off you access to 1-300 numbers?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  134. What about Australian sites? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Do australian sites also count against the bandwidth limit?

    It seems like it might not be worth the bother for them to figure that out, but there have to be a lot of sites within Australia that people would actually want to visit...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:What about Australian sites? by stor · · Score: 1

      Do australian sites also count against the bandwidth limit?

      Depends on the ISP/plan but usually content stored on Aussie servers won't count against the user's allowance.

      I'm sure it happens though: some ISPs in Australia will squeeze as much cash out of their users as possible.

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
  135. This would be great except for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The fact that Michael Malone is the biggest arsehole in Perth (and thats saying alot) and iiNets infrastructure is a joke. This is a company that thinks running multiple Cisco 7200's at 90% load as their core routing is a good idea. This is the company who's boss forced everybody to a badly (I mean really) run Windows office infrastructure including the engineers because despite excellent arguments to the contrary could not ever admit he was wrong. This is a company who even a lot of the people still working there think is evil, it buys east coast businesses closes their offices then offers them jobs in the most boring and isolated city in the world (Perth) so they get stuck there and their wages can be lowered . This is the last sort of company you want to see become a bigger player in the Australian ISP market.

  136. Sweden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And Bredbandsbolaget in Sweden is selling 100 Mbps for SEK 595 (roughly US$85.32).

    Here's their page. (sorry, just in Swedish)

  137. I'm currently @ 10MBps by atlasm · · Score: 1

    on a cable modem.

  138. How about us in the USA?? by redmoss · · Score: 1

    Bah!

    I hate our #$#&@ monopolist telecom carriers!

  139. Re:I don't live in Australia by Chuq · · Score: 1

    Australia is a BIG country, expect huge variations in temperature. Tasmania is cold as is Melbourne and you'll freeze your balls off.

    I'd expect most people from north-eastern US or southern Canada would find Melbourne or Tasmania quite nice. (As an example, it doesn't snow in populated areas in Australia - only really the mountainous areas.) It's cold in winter, but great in summer. As opposed to Queensland, where its great in winter, stinking hot in summer - how is that any better?! Just depends what you're used to I guess.

    (To tell the truth, many people south of Brisbane would find Tasmania quite nice, but they haven't actually been here, they just listen to the weather jokes..)

    --
    - Chuq
  140. Re:capped to 40GB/month by complete+loony · · Score: 1

    Yeah and then there are the "Unlimited" plans where you only get to download say 12GB before they shape your traffic down to modem speeds. I overheard a conversation between a sales guy at the telstra shop once, the sales guy said all the right things like "with the unlimited plan, you can download 12GB ... and we won't charge you any extra", and the n00b goes "Unlimited... cool, so I can download as much as I want". Then the sales guy didn't correct him...
    So while it is true that the geeks check the fine print, most people getting broadband for the first time just listen to the "Unlimited" quote.
    Mind you it's better than it used to be, where ISP's used to charge by the MB when you went over without warning you, and later when the $4K bill comes for the month ....

    --
    09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  141. Like in Australia by Namarrgon · · Score: 1
    Many Australian ISPs allow unmetered transfers (unlimited volume) between customers, usually within the same state - it offsets the bandwidth caps and makes the plans more attractive. A lot of those are connecting to PIPE, a dark fibre backbone that allows fixed-cost peering, which is often unmetered too.

    However, transfers are still made at your upstream bandwidth limit - e.g. with 1536/256 ADSL like mine, I get around 25 KB/s to upload to others, whether on the same net or not.

    Best link I had was in the Bad Old Days of early Telstra cable... up to 30 Mbit/s down and 768 Kbit/s up. This was rather drastically offset by the 100 MB (yes, megabyte) monthly volume cap, which I could exceed at the so-reasonable price of 35c/MB...

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
    1. Re:Like in Australia by ender81b · · Score: 1

      The same works in Nebraska, at least on our DSL customers - what the previous poster was describing was the taking off of the upstream bandwith limits (like instead of 256 1.5 megabit up) which is a whole different ball of wax.

      Also, sweet merciful christ, 100 megs? You can exceed that using dialup!

    2. Re:Like in Australia by Namarrgon · · Score: 1
      Yeah well, so long as they keep putting that A in ADSL, I'm not expecting much.

      Though I suppose they could keep their precious A and give me 1536/3072, I wouldn't mind.

      --
      Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  142. Re:Not so lucky by Wild+Wizard · · Score: 1

    80GB with 8Mb data rates, you are kidding of course.

    Here we do 40-50GB with only 512Kb ADSL in a reginal area of Queensland for only $79.95.

    I would expect at least 200GB allowance with such a large pipe.

  143. Re:Not so lucky by houseofzeus · · Score: 0

    Why would you expect a faster connection AND a 200 gig allowance for only ten dollars a month more?

  144. Re:capped to 40GB/month by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    It would have to be oddly that odd movie too, since once you've downloaded 3 or 4 decent quality copies, you've almost blown the limit.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  145. At the theoretical maximum speed... by Kadmium · · Score: 1

    Well, I should probably start this off by mentioning the download limits and the shaping that comes into effect. With this plan, you get 500mb, and after that, you start paying extra, up to the $59.95 cap. After you hit that cap, your bandwidth is slowed to 64k/s. You hit that cap after 500mb over the included data. This means you get 1gb of data at the speeds advertised before you have, essentially, single channel ISDN. That's two minutes and five seconds at the theoretical maximum, or eleven minutes and six seconds at the much more likely 1500k/s. Gee thanks, iiNet. I can't wait to sign up.

  146. Re:capped to 40GB/month by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    Even now, Optus still make a point of calling their accounts "unlimited" even though they are clearly not unlimited, and haven't been for years. Furthermore, their phone staff feel no problem in calling the plans unlimited when speaking to the customer.

    This was in fact the case just the other day when I was cancelling my account. I told them that I was moving to an ISP which had unlimited downloads, and the woman on the phone claimed that Optus had an "unlimited download plan" (in those exact words.)

    So I guess it depends. If customers believe anything their ISP says, then yes... they could well be under the misapprehension that they have unlimited downloads. Those of us who read the fine print are within our power to move to some ISP who doesn't use the fine print as part of their marketing strategy.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  147. Ping... echo echo echo by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

    We were getting latency of 4000 to 8000 over the weekend to WoW, apparently in part due to the SingTel router outage

    --
    Sara
    Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  148. Unlimited, well sort of... by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

    The 'trick' is the ISP's definition of excessive downloads, read the fine print of most "Unlimited" TOS, and most will say that unlimited downloads are not acceptable. We called our ISP before switching to an unlimited plan, their definition of Unlimited was 100Gb or so.

    --
    Sara
    Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  149. Re:capped to 40GB/month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have Truly unlim no shaping no AUP 1500/256 ADSL

    No Australia does have unlim broadband, its just costs abit more.

  150. 12.5 times faster for only twice the price? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in Tokyo I have 100mbit fibre connection with 5 global IP's for only 50 bucks a month. Quite amazing since only 5 years there was only dial up with timed local calls at 10 cents every 3 mins.

  151. Re:capped to 40GB/month by Meski · · Score: 1

    Because some of us have a real life, but when we *do* use the internet, would like it to be faster than 128kbits/sec... Downloading movies and MP3's doesn't really have much appeal.

  152. Re:Not so lucky by Pyr05x · · Score: 1

    Picture a pair of cans connected by a string hanging over a cesspool. That is the current Australian "Broadband" situation. ... with a sign hanging from the string that says "Telstra 0wns j00!"