Slashdot Mirror


Report on Last Decade of Online Advertising

Eh-Wire writes "Doubleclick.com has an interesting 24 page PDF available covering the history of online advertising over the last decade. Interesting trivia include recounts of some of the first online ads presented on HotWired. Online advertising has become very competitive in the last ten years and last year saw a revival of activity in this form of advertising. The usual selection of graphs and charts are there to pretty up the document. Overall an interesting read if you're into that sort of thing."

211 comments

  1. grrrr by mrbaggs · · Score: 0

    Man I hate doubleclick with the tracking cookies they use.

    1. Re:grrrr by Pionar · · Score: 1

      Yes, because tracking cookies are evil and "they" know who you are!!

      Take your tinfoil hat off. It's roasting your brain.

    2. Re:grrrr by MankyD · · Score: 4, Informative

      If it helps at all, opt out at the top of the page. You'll still have a cookie, but, in theory, it instructs them not to track you.

      --
      -dave
      http://millionnumbers.com/ - own the number of your dreams
    3. Re:grrrr by KinkifyTheNation · · Score: 1

      Or you can just, you know, block the cookies!

  2. Thanks! by Mancat · · Score: 0, Troll

    Oh Doubleclick, you're my favorite! Thanks for all the cookies and spam!

    --
    hello dear sirs my name is jamesh i are india (bihar) can u guide me install red had linux 9?
    1. Re:Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll? Honestly, who mods this shit?

  3. One would *think* by RM6f9 · · Score: 1

    With ten years of empirical research they'd *know* what motivates people to purchase. sigh.

    --
    Take the 90-Day Challenge! http://rwmurker.bodybyvi.com/
    1. Re:One would *think* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes one would think, but they don't. I have a blanket policy - I simply refuse to buy a product that keeps on popping under/over (whatever this week's variant is), appears in the spam flood, or is any part of the tele-drone army that call you when you're eating dinner.

    2. Re:One would *think* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupidity, duh.

    3. Re:One would *think* by MynockGuano · · Score: 4, Insightful
      With ten years of empirical research they'd *know* what motivates people to purchase. sigh.

      Apparently, they think they do. From TFA:
      The many forms of marketing and advertising it enables---permission email, keyword-targeted search engine advertising, floating animated page takeovers, interactive onpage rich media ads, streaming audio and video, consumer-fueled "viral marketing," to name a few--have excited early adopters and now mainstream marketers in ways that traditional advertising has not seen the likes of since the early days of color television.

      "Viral Marketing" -- WOW!
      "Interactive on-page rich media ads" -- SWEET!
      "Floating animated page takeovers" -- SIGN ME UP!

      It almost sounds as if they're proud of these things.
    4. Re:One would *think* by Bullfish · · Score: 1

      Lemme see, an interesting article by the Sons of Evil detailing their rise and experience. Yet another reason to hate PDF's

      This was called interesting?

      Personally, I wish it named the person who came up with the first pop-up ad so we could have a lottery to hunt him/her down and beat them senseless with a sock filled with sand

    5. Re:One would *think* by Neoncow · · Score: 1
      They're selling the ability to annoy prospective customers into buying a product. And they're making money.

      They should damn well be proud.

    6. Re:One would *think* by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Bash the last two all you want, but viral marketing is one of the few forms of advertising out there that consistently has cool ideas. So many of the fun video clips everybody loves on the internet are forms of viral marketing. People love them. That must mean they're doing SOMETHING right.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    7. Re:One would *think* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It almost sounds as if they're proud of these things.


      Of course they are; they see the correlation between these things and the number of digits on their paycheck.

  4. Gee, I'd love to look at that... by adb · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...but for some reason Doubleclick keeps resolving to localhost.

    1. Re:Gee, I'd love to look at that... by nuclearspike · · Score: 1

      I'm finding I have the same "problem."

    2. Re:Gee, I'd love to look at that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit, never thought of that. What a great idea. :)

    3. Re:Gee, I'd love to look at that... by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wait a minute. You run Doubleclick don't you? I should've expected it from someone called AdB

    4. Re:Gee, I'd love to look at that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are massive host files out there which block out a lot of the more aggressive advertisers. Almost makes adblock redundant...

    5. Re:Gee, I'd love to look at that... by william.gunn · · Score: 1

      You know, having an ad filter so agressive that it blocks legitimate pages doesn't make you cool. Adding doubleclick to your hosts file is a crude hack. Would you accept a spamfilter which gave you a 1% false positive rate, and never changed no matter how many emails you received? Face it, using the hosts file is a crude hack. We need more adaptable solutions, but for now, Adblock is clearly the best. What we really need is for adversisers to not drive us to such ends.

      $0.02
      I don't block adsense, appropriately placed banners, most other neutrally colored, non-flashing, moving or otherwise distracting ads. However, somewhere between the data leaving your server and rendering on my machine, it ceases to become yours and becomes mine. I have every right to determine how something displays on my screen, just as you have every right to choose to serve the content or not.

    6. Re:Gee, I'd love to look at that... by Anonymous+Luddite · · Score: 1

      >> using the hosts file is a crude hack.

      all a matter of perspective. It's already there, you change it once and it is done. I think it is perfectly fit for the task and elegant in its' simplicity.

      Now a crude hack would be changing my boss's host file to resolve slashdot to some hardcore pr0n site...

    7. Re:Gee, I'd love to look at that... by Big+Mark · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your computer may be broadcasting an IP ADDRESS!!!

      127.0.0.1, in this case!

    8. Re:Gee, I'd love to look at that... by william.gunn · · Score: 1

      That would be crude. It would also be rude, not to mention lewd. Hey, don't be a prude, do it dude!

    9. Re:Gee, I'd love to look at that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      goatse.cx

    10. Re:Gee, I'd love to look at that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too! Does yours have a lot of porn instead of the article also?

  5. Damn it! by oreaq · · Score: 5, Funny

    I really wanted to read TFA article this time but my ad filter blocked it.

  6. The last three years have been ad free... by garcia · · Score: 5, Informative

    Over the last ten years, and especially the last three, I have become increasingly annoyed with online advertising and have done what I can to virtually eliminate it from showing its ugly face on my screen.

    squid and adzapper which is currently replacing many ads with 1x1 transparent GIFs. This is especially handy because I tunnel all my web traffic at work over my 256k upstream DSL connection. Do I really want to be wasting bandwith with flashing or changing ads? /etc/hosts to eliminate things like ads.osdn.com, ads.doubleclick.net, and various others. Yeah, I could add them to adzapper but it's a lot more fun to just block them all together. It gives me a sense of accomplishment.

    Any other ideas on how to surf ad free?

    1. Re:The last three years have been ad free... by uucp2 · · Score: 5, Funny
      Any other ideas on how to surf ad free?
      Sure. I recommend using lynx, works great.
    2. Re:The last three years have been ad free... by I_Human · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I recently added Adblock and Flashblock to Firefox and it works really well. The first hour after installing them I went to all of my favorite web pages and cut the ads out, now I am happily searching ad-free!

      --
      -JP
    3. Re:The last three years have been ad free... by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      yup....

      privoxy

      it gives you GOBS of control and will block lots of popups that some popup blockers cant, strips all 1.1 gif files kills the info your browser uses to rat on you, and gives you control over cookies.

      I use it here at work for everyone and it's very speedy even though it runs on a slow P-III600 for 100 users.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:The last three years have been ad free... by yotto · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You were modded funny, but I've been using ELinks (Which is a beefier version of Lynx) for about 6 months now at work and it has 2 benefits:

      1) No ads. Only google ads do I see, because google's ads are in text.
      2) Everybody at work thinks I'm working because my terminal looks like a dos screen.

    5. Re:The last three years have been ad free... by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      On windows I use AdMuncher to eliminate banners, popups, flash ads, iframes, replacement context menus, etc. It is completely transparent, no proxy configuration required. It filters *ANY* http application, so I dont even see ads in non-browser programs that fetch ads from a web server (like divx player).

      On linux squid and privoxy are good options, but AdMuncher is releasing a linux version soon. I eagerly await it.

    6. Re:The last three years have been ad free... by Reziac · · Score: 0

      I use old Netscape 3.04 myself, with images and js both disabled. Ad banners? Popups?? what are you talking about?? :)

      A lot of what I like about this setup is exactly what attracts other folks to textmode browsers -- it's simple, fast, seldom misbehaves, and never annoys me with useless junk.

      BTW I dragged home elinks a while back, but my first attempt to use it... er, well, it refused to run.... I'd hate to have to RTFM!! :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    7. Re:The last three years have been ad free... by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I've been using the standard Firefox install, and never suffer from any popups/popunders, or any other annoying ads.

      And no, I don't mind ads such as Google's, or ordinary image-ads, as I know that most sites can stay online, because of them.

    8. Re:The last three years have been ad free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I recently added Adblock and Flashblock to Firefox and it works really well. The first hour after installing them I went to all of my favorite web pages and cut the ads out, now I am happily searching ad-free!

      I'm sure those websites appreciate your support..oh that's right, you're leaching not supporting. With friends like that who needs competitors?

    9. Re:The last three years have been ad free... by plone · · Score: 1

      Ad Muncher Usage Statistics for v4.6 Build 10270
      Adverts removed by Ad Muncher: 685,517
      Approximate bandwidth saved: 5,355 MB
      Counter started: January 10, 2004

    10. Re:The last three years have been ad free... by harikiri · · Score: 1

      The only problem with Adblock is that some pages are specifically formatted for an image of a certain size, and cutting them out still leaves an annoying section of white space.

      --
      Man watching 6 MSCE's around a sun box, looks alot like the opening scene's of 2001:space odyssey...
    11. Re:The last three years have been ad free... by I_Human · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see Adblock and Flashblock working together - as it is if one has a flash item adblocked flashblock still pops up, then when selected it disappears. It would be neat if it were already adblocked it just didn't show up. I guess I'm a little off-topic now.

      --
      -JP
    12. Re:The last three years have been ad free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny. my hosts file has about 150 entries for most common ad servers (like doubleclick) that resolve to a fake webserver I wrote back in 1997-1998. Haven't had much advertising problems since then.

    13. Re:The last three years have been ad free... by MrSnivvel · · Score: 1

      Here is a pre-compiled list that can be added to your /etc/hosts file and points those sites to 127.0.0.1.
      MVPS.org

  7. Shock and awe by BaldGhoti · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am stunned and amazed that it was a PDF and not an HTML page full of flash advertising.

    --
    [insert witty sig here]
    1. Re:Shock and awe by Hallow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't you know that's why Adobe bought macromedia?

    2. Re:Shock and awe by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      Which means that we will get a PDF full of flashing advertizing that is embedded into HTML?

      Holy combos Batman!!

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    3. Re:Shock and awe by MmmmAqua · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nobody at Doubleclick will understand your (justified) incredulity unless you call it "flashvertising". Duh, get with the times...

      ;)

      --
      Arr! The laws of physics be a harsh mistress!
    4. Re:Shock and awe by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      This is DoubleClick, they are an advertising business. This ENTIRE REPORT is HUGE PR for them, and not only drives traffic to their site, but gets people to talk about, and consider their business.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  8. Hmmm... strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Every time I click on that doubleclick link I get redirected to 127.0.0.1 :-)

    1. Re:Hmmm... strange by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny
      > Every time I click on that doubleclick link I get redirected to 127.0.0.1 :-)

      Doubleclick is probably the only site on the 'net immunte to the Slashdot Effect.

  9. I'm not falling for that! by stlhawkeye · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ha! This "history" article is a subtle form of advertising for Doubleclick. Where's my tin foil hat?

    --
    "I have never won a debate with an ignorant person." -Ali ibn Abi Talib
    1. Re:I'm not falling for that! by Tassach · · Score: 1
      Come on, did you really expect a "study" about X funded by someone who sells X to not be self-serving?

      That's about as likely as Microsoft funding a study that concludes "Linux is better than Windows" or Jerry Fallwell saying "Gee, maybe there's something to what that Mohammad guy said after all".

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    2. Re:I'm not falling for that! by stlhawkeye · · Score: 1

      No, I didn't. Hence, I was making fun of the obvious self-serving nature of the article. I mod you -1 Oblivious.

      --
      "I have never won a debate with an ignorant person." -Ali ibn Abi Talib
  10. hosts file by BillGodfrey · · Score: 1, Funny

    Dag nabbit!

  11. In other news... by Anti+Frozt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Online advertising saw a dramatic decrease today as one of the world's largest online advertising agencies, DoubleClick.com, mysteriously went silent.

    Sources pointed to a /. article that linked to a PDF on DoubleClick.com's website as the culprit.

    --
    In C++, friends can touch each others private parts.
    1. Re:In other news... by aurumaeus · · Score: 1

      DoubleClick is an adserving tech company, they aren't an agency.

    2. Re:In other news... by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Hmm a virus that performs a DOS to doubleclick - I might let that one slide on my computer :)

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    3. Re:In other news... by aslate · · Score: 1

      The flaw with that is that everyone is redirecting to 127.0.0.1 instead. Maybe we've found a way to slashdot our own PCs!

  12. I will sum up the last 10 years of ads in 2 words by FidelCatsro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Increasingly annoying.

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  13. Almost read this but... by IronChefMorimoto · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...a giant pop-up ad for boob enhancements caught my attention first.

    IronChefMorimoto

  14. PLEASE by TechnologyX · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everyone RTFPDF, the internet will thank you if you take out Doubleclick's servers for a few hours!

    --
    Slashdot sucks
    1. Re:PLEASE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd love to, but their server at 127.0.0.1 doesn't seem to have it... I've never understood why people don't like DoubleClick, "This page can not be found" banner ads aren't really THAT bad, are they?

    2. Re:PLEASE by drew · · Score: 1

      assuming this is even served off the same servers that host their ads, i worked for one of doubleclick's competitors 5 years ago, before doubleclick bought them. we were serving 6 billion ads a month in 2000, and we might have been one of the top five online advertisers. considering doubleclick probably had double our traffic before they bought us, and considering how many other companies they've swallowed up over the years....

      if you think even the combined bandwidth of every slashdotter has a chance of even perceptibly slowing down doubleclick, you are deluding yourself.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    3. Re:PLEASE by fbjon · · Score: 1
      But how many work at large companies and read slashdot at work? Not everyone diddles with a 256mbit DSL.

      Imagine a few corporations, a number of large, a horde of medium and a swarm of small businesses, and add on top of all that one home connection per slashdotter, since everyone accesses their home boxes from work. Might be a bit. Imagine if a slashdotter at Google sets all requests to return a 301 header pointing to TFPDF.

      Don't underestimate the powwwerrr of the dark green side!

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    4. Re:PLEASE by TechnologyX · · Score: 1

      deamn, that's a lot of ads.. They could retaliate and change all their ads to the /. logo or something, and slashdot slashdot.

      The intarweb would implode

      --
      Slashdot sucks
  15. In other news... by trurl7 · · Score: 4, Funny

    microsoft.com has released a PDF covering the history of online sado-masochism. Interesting trivia include the first recorded use of an Intercal interpreter in a webbrowser, and server-side VBscripting. The usual reviews of IIS version 234.33.5.8.83.stable are included, with pretty pictures of performance trumping apache. An interesting read, if you're into that sort of thing.

  16. Smart or Dumb... by DaHat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't decide if the poster of this story is a genius... or an idiot.

    Traditionally posting a direct link to a 1 meg file on the front page of /. is dumb... but at the same time... DoubleClick is not a very popular company when it comes to the ads they sell or those like them... so such a /.ing can only hurt those most /.ers dislike... hum

    1. Re:Smart or Dumb... by Tassach · · Score: 3, Funny
      If you really dislike them:
      #!/bin/bash
      set URL=http://www.doubleclick.com/us/knowledge_centra l/documents/RESEARCH/dc_decaderinonline_0504.pdf

      while (`true`); do wget $URL; done
      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    2. Re:Smart or Dumb... by Clowning · · Score: 1

      All these people have set doubleclick to 127.0.0.1 in their /etc/hosts and are desperately trying to view the PDF ...

      In soviet russia slashdot slashdots you!

      What?

    3. Re:Smart or Dumb... by DaHat · · Score: 1

      Almost makes me wish I ran Linux or had the bash shell around... almost.

    4. Re:Smart or Dumb... by beakerMeep · · Score: 2, Informative

      you're kidding yourself if you think a 1mb file is gonna take down doubleclick even with slashdot's enormous traffic it's tiny copared to what they serve out in a day. but it's a nice thought :)

      --
      meep
    5. Re:Smart or Dumb... by michaelwigle · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's why I decided that to make up for all of those who got redirected to localhost by opening the document a bunch of times in tabs. Sadly though, they all loaded quite quickly. I'm very disappointed in the /.ers. :P

    6. Re:Smart or Dumb... by drew · · Score: 1

      i also would be very surprised if this file was even served off the same pool of servers as their ads.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
  17. I Wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I wonder what things like adblock will do over the next several years to the market. You keep coming up with ways to block them and they'll come up with ways to get around you or be more annoying I bet.

    1. Re:I Wonder by NetNifty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would they waste time trying to advertise to people who have made it perfectly clear that we don't want annoying intrusive advertising thrust upon us. The best thing they could do imo for all parties concerned is use plain text ads, they aren't intrusive enough to annoy hardly anyone and therefore probably won't be blocked.

    2. Re:I Wonder by pershino · · Score: 1
      The best thing they could do imo for all parties concerned is use plain text ads, they aren't intrusive enough to annoy hardly anyone and therefore probably won't be blocked.

      Actually, I've seen several sites that use text ads placed directly inside a news story; usually between the introduction and main story. The effect is that you read the intro and begin reading the first line of the ad, then have to break your concentration to skip the rest of the ad and find the actual story. Now THAT really does piss me off!

    3. Re:I Wonder by jaydonnell · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Why would they waste time trying to advertise to people who have made it perfectly clear that we don't want annoying intrusive advertising thrust upon us"

      I can think of two reasons of the top of my head.

      1. People actually click thru the ads!
      2. Most people aren't willing to pay subscription fees for the sites they visit, and the sites have to "thrust" ads upon users to get by.

    4. Re:I Wonder by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      The best thing they can do is stop advertising to us and let us make our own choices (which, given other stories today, is what we're supposed to be doing anyway)

  18. Last Decade by MrLint · · Score: 0, Troll

    Wow this will be the last decade of online advertising? Sweet! im waiting for 2010!

    1. Re:Last Decade by yRabbit · · Score: 1

      "Troll"? Looks more like a "Funny" to me. ^^
      As for myself, sort of redundant. It would be nice if this were the last decade of online advertising. :)

      My real thoughts, though, were:
      "Overall an interesting read if you're into that sort of thing."?
      Nobody is into online advertising. ;>

    2. Re:Last Decade by MrLint · · Score: 1

      Rabbit, thanks. I have a feeling I stepped on someone's toes and the masked kiddie is taking his revenge.

  19. Oooh by Ninjy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    What, /. links to sadomasochism now?

    1. Re:Oooh by Ninjy · · Score: 1

      Pffft, it was supposed to be funny.

  20. Click Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    You're a winner!

  21. Here, let me summarize the last 10 years: by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 4, Funny
    User: Aaargh! Ads! Ignore, ignore, ignore.

    Advertiser: Ignore my ad, willya? Fine, I'll make it blink!

    User: Ugh, it blinks! Block, block, block.

    Advertiser: Block my ad, willya? Fine, I'll make it pop up!

    User: Grrrr, I hate those pop-ups! Suppress, suppress, suppress.

    Advertiser: Suppress my pop-ups, willya? Fine, I'll wire your eyeballs open while I play this movie for you--

    (Sorry, that last step is from the near future.)

    1. Re:Here, let me summarize the last 10 years: by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1

      Advertiser: Suppress my pop-ups, willya? Fine, I'll wire your eyeballs open while I play this movie for you-- (Sorry, that last step is from the near future.) No it's not. Never met a website that will only display the requested content after you saw a short movie ?

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    2. Re:Here, let me summarize the last 10 years: by yotto · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have, but so far I've always been able to clsoe the page and find the info elsewhere. If the info was only available on that site, I lived withouth the info.

      The less places you can get a piece of information, the less useful and truthful that information is anyway.

    3. Re:Here, let me summarize the last 10 years: by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      You missed out 9: PROFIT!!!

    4. Re:Here, let me summarize the last 10 years: by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      The less places you can get a piece of information, the less useful and truthful that information is anyway.

      Buh?! How many times have myths, rumors, hearsay, and outright lies been mistaken for fact and propagated throughout the media?

      --
      -mkb
    5. Re:Here, let me summarize the last 10 years: by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 1

      yep, 90% of everything is crap - Sturgeons Law

      --
      #
      #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
      #
    6. Re:Here, let me summarize the last 10 years: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When somebody invents a device that lets advertisers wire your eyeballs open over the Internet, I'll invent a device that lets you stab advertisers in the face over the Internet.

    7. Re:Here, let me summarize the last 10 years: by Duhavid · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why wait?

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    8. Re:Here, let me summarize the last 10 years: by hostyle · · Score: 1

      I take it you haven't taken part in the Slashdot one-day pass to the Mysterious Future then? You get to join subscribers in seeing the news before its made available to all for a full day - the price? Watch some silly ad.

      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
  22. Its really difficult these days by Saven+Marek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As an advertiser not to get lumped in with the same bucket as people who spam outright or spread malware and scam people. I am employed by a bulk email marketing business used by several medical companies and more often than not our services are presumed to be spam and blocked by users.

    This is unfortunate as I see it, as it was easier in the earlier days before spammers took over the internet and all forms of advertising were acceptable and just known as part of the internet. I dont think the tools to block adverts are doing good either. sometime somewhere someone has to pay for the sites you visit. Not accepting their advertising banners and emails is a form of rippinbg people off I thnk.

    1. Re:Its really difficult these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      To quote the genius Bill Hicks...

      "By the way, if anyone here is in marketing or advertising...kill yourself. Thank you. Just planting seeds, planting seeds is all I'm doing. No joke here, really. Seriously, kill yourself, you have no rationalisation for what you do, you are Satan's little helpers. Kill yourself, kill yourself, kill yourself now. Now, back to the show. Seriously, I know the marketing people: 'There's gonna be a joke comin' up.' There's no fuckin' joke. Suck a tail pipe, hang yourself...borrow a pistol from an NRA buddy, do something...rid the world of your evil fuckin' presence."

    2. Re:Its really difficult these days by DrJonesAC2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You must be new here.

    3. Re:Its really difficult these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So in what way is your "bulk email marketing" not spam? Is it confirmed opt-in? Just curious.

    4. Re:Its really difficult these days by kz45 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is unfortunate as I see it, as it was easier in the earlier days before spammers took over the internet and all forms of advertising were acceptable and just known as part of the internet. I dont think the tools to block adverts are doing good either. sometime somewhere someone has to pay for the sites you visit. Not accepting their advertising banners and emails is a form of ripping people off I thnk.

      I wouldn't go so far as to say it's ripping people off.

      All large scale sites (including slashdot) need some form of advertising or revenue stream. If these ads are blocked continuously and the revenue isn't there, sites will go away or will be forced to charge money.

      I would rather have free sites with advertisements than for-pay sites.

    5. Re:Its really difficult these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How could anyone confuse bulk email marketing with spam? They're a different as chalk and chalk. And more chalk. And more chalk and more chalk and so much fucking chalk that you can't read your real email.

    6. Re:Its really difficult these days by Saven+Marek · · Score: 1

      yes we only send material to the subscribers of web sites belonging to our clients (they are chiefly pharmacies) and are all opt in.

    7. Re:Its really difficult these days by eddy+the+lip · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not anti-advertising by any means, and I'd like to jump in here before the hordes rip you a new one.

      I'm assuming that you have an opt-in only list, with addresses collected from people that knew exactly what they were opting in to? Otherwise it's unsolicited, and it's spam. Full stop. I don't htink there's anything wrong with opt-in lists, but if I get email I'm not expecting from someone selling something, I'm going to be right pissed. There's no way you can tell me that ditching email I receive without reading it is stealing; certainly no more than tossing the grocery store flyers I get in the recycling.

      As for online advertising, there's a fine line. I don't generally block ads, because I do like to support the sites that I read. Content and bandwidth don't come free, and I'm more than happy to see an ad or two to support it. Slashdot and Boing Boing are two good examples of doing this right.

      However, if you intentionally abuse my goodwill and make your site hard to use by flashy, blink, whizzy, poppy things, yes, I'm going to block them. I don't think there's anything wrong with enhancing the usability of what is a poorly designed site.

      The real problem right now is greedy, clueless advertisers that are driving people to use adblockers. They're busily destroying any future market for themselves. It's the kind of short sighted business tactics we're getting all too used to seeing. "Leave a little salt for the bread" and all that.

      I can't tell from your post, but I have to say it sounds an awful lot like you should be lumped in with these people. Maybe I'm wrong, but you really should be donning that asbestos underwear about now.

      (Spyware and malware are a whole other evil kettle, I agree. You are 100% wrong, though, that advertising has always been an accepted part of the internet. Maybe if you came on after the Endless September, but before that it was seriously frowned on.)

      --

      This is the voice of World Control. I bring you Peace.

    8. Re:Its really difficult these days by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Words like that will get you modded down, flamebaited, trolled, stalked, lynched, bilged, and other nasty things. Didn't you know that no form of advertising is OK on the Internet according to most people here on /.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    9. Re:Its really difficult these days by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      "I would rather have free sites with advertisements than for-pay sites."

      And I would rather have free sites with advertisements that I am not compelled to download and watch their strobe-like effects.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    10. Re:Its really difficult these days by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      I forget which site it was, but I sent them a tech support request. Which got me a crappy tech support response (i ended up figuring it out on my own)...a day later I got spam from them. So now even tech support opts a person in.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    11. Re:Its really difficult these days by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Nobody is forced to run a web site. I used to run a small site, and happily paid out of pocket for that service. Problem is, some people have come to regard the web as a cash cow, as if they should earn money just for people visiting their site. Suck it up, if a company's business model relies on annoying people it probably won't be effective in the long run.

    12. Re:Its really difficult these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. He's been modded up twice, and had been before you posted.

      2. If he got modded down it wouldn't be for suggesting ads can be okay, it would be for being involved in "bulk email marketing" for "medical companies". I mean maybe he isn't spamming people with ads for cheap viagra and penis extenders but it sure sounds like it.

    13. Re:Its really difficult these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      made my day

    14. Re:Its really difficult these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh get real - the main purpose of web sites is to generate customers and increase revenue. If you can't afford to run a web site without soul sucking advertising, then you better get outta fuckin business, cause your web presence is not doing it's fuckin job.

    15. Re:Its really difficult these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't answer his question. Using phrases like "opt in" or "double opt in" in a lackadaisical manner is the normal MO of spammers. Let me ask again - do you do confirmed opt-in? That is to say, do you require a subscriber to respond to an email before they are added to a list?

    16. Re:Its really difficult these days by DogDude · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Suck it up, if a company's business model relies on annoying people it probably won't be effective in the long run.

      Ever heard of a little thing called "TV"?

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    17. Re:Its really difficult these days by bit01 · · Score: 1

      I would rather have free sites with advertisements than for-pay sites.

      I would prefer not to pay twice: my time to watch/avoid the ad and my money for the increased, ad supporting price of the product.

      ---

      It's wrong that an intellectual property creator should not be rewarded for their work.
      It's equally wrong that an IP creator should be rewarded too many times for the one piece of work, for exactly the same reasons.
      Reform IP law and stop the M$/RIAA abuse.

    18. Re:Its really difficult these days by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of a little thing called "TV"?

      Yeah. I'll see your "TV" and raise you one "Tivo."

    19. Re:Its really difficult these days by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      i've never really found a problem with the advertisting on osdn sites. (slashdot sourceforce etc) sure its sometimes animated sometimes even flash but it doesn't pop up or move round the page or anything like that and it quickly scrolls off once your actually reading a longer page. i think i've seen a pop-up blocked notification on slashdot exactly once. simple banners don't bother me much even if animated its the pop-ups and thier in window but equally annoying descendents that piss me off. Especially bad are those that move back to the top when you scroll with huge lag. i notice firefoxe out of the box only blocks popups (which to be honest should never have been added in the first place) but doesn't come will fully fleged ad blocking out of the box. I think this is a sensible descision in the long term.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  23. Nothing says fun... by glenrm · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nothing say fun like the history of online advertising over the last decade.

    1. Re:Nothing says fun... by Tackhead · · Score: 2, Funny
      > Nothing say fun like "the history of online advertising over the last decade".

      For values of "fun" approaching "suck"...

  24. remember when .... by bardothodal · · Score: 1

    There wasn't any advertising on the internet and porn was free.....

    --
    No matter where you go , there you are.
    1. Re:remember when .... by LiSrt · · Score: 1

      wtf?, internet porn will always be free; the "preview selections" at least, a complete hi-res pic series on the other hand...

    2. Re:remember when .... by error406 · · Score: 0

      Euh, on my end of my firewall there's still no advertising and now not only the pr0n, but also the music and movies are free.... I'm a firm believer in progress thru technology...

    3. Re:remember when .... by inject_hotmail.com · · Score: 1

      There wasn't any advertising on the internet and porn was free.....

      Yeah, I'm still remembering the latter...it's still free! :) I do remember when most of the F500 companies said they'd never go on the net because it would never provide a source for real revenue...

      uh....yuh...

      Anyone in this room live on the Internet? Raise your hand...... ..counting..counting..counting..counting..ad infinitum..

      Yep, that's what I thought, me too. :) ...

      And if you pay for porn, you deserve to be separated from your money. imho.

      Inject.

    4. Re:remember when .... by 01101101 · · Score: 1

      Actually I do remember an internet before advertising was plastered across every page, before spam, and everybody just trying to make a buck.
      I remember when it was filled with primarily university people instead of corporations and the common masses. I remember when 'the web' was just one of the things you would do on the internet.

      I think that is why the 'net' bothers me so much these days, because I do remember what it used to be like. The people that have joined in the last few years really take for granted that the ads have to be there, that your inbox has to overflow with spam. They just don't know any better, they don't know how it used to be.

    5. Re:remember when .... by bardothodal · · Score: 1

      Ya , whatever happened to gopher and archie anyway?

      --
      No matter where you go , there you are.
  25. History? by Shotgun · · Score: 2, Funny

    And next week we'll present the history of this week. And the week after that...

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    1. Re:History? by kfg · · Score: 1

      And next week we'll present the history of this week.

      Britney Spears appears to have published two autobiographies so far.

      Here's a hot tip to all teenybooper pop stars who think maybe it's about time to write the story of their life:

      First, get one!

      KFG

    2. Re:History? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Britney Spears can write?

    3. Re:History? by kfg · · Score: 1

      They were both "collaborations" with. . .her mom, who I presume actually handled the crayon in transcribing the tape for the uncredited ghost writer.

      Sheesh.

      KFG

    4. Re:History? by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      do you work for VH1?

  26. Content on Doubleclick? by Experiment+626 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not that people RTFA on a normal article, but in this case any geek worth his salt will have Doubleclick blocked in their /etc/hosts, router tables, Adblock filters, or what have you and in the case of the tinfoil hat types, all of the above just to be sure. I really don't think it's worth turning my filters off just to hear Doubleclick spin the history of online advertising to make themselves sound good.

    1. Re:Content on Doubleclick? by sjlutz · · Score: 1

      I used to have them all blocked, and then management signed a deal to serve Doubleclick ads on our site. Had to take the /dev/null routes out so that management could see the ads :-)

    2. Re:Content on Doubleclick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, RTFA first.

    3. Re:Content on Doubleclick? by yarbo · · Score: 1

      It's in my adblock, so I just wgetted the pdf...

  27. First Banner Ad Blocker 199x, Cookie Blocker 199x? by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Any ideas what the dates were for the first banner ad blocker and the first cookie blocker? (or for that matter, the first time somebody recommended mapping doubleclick.net to 127.0.0.1?)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  28. Great new product! by Chemisor · · Score: 1

    Do you find yourself frequently clicking on advertising banners? Is your house full of useless items you bought for no good reason? Do you believe yourself especially vulnerable to online advertising? Are you tired of being stupid? Get protection! We, at brainpills.com, have the solutions for all your problems! Instant results are guaranteed! Double your IQ in just minutes with our trademark brain pills made of all-natural ingredients! Gain the power to instantly recognize frauds, determine what you need to buy and what you don't, and save thousands of dollars by avoiding overpriced products! Take control of your life NOW! Come to brainpills.com and buy our product for the low-low-low-low marked-down blowout-sale price of $99.95! Click now!

  29. /. effect by keyrat+rafa · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think this is the first time I've clicked a link here hoping the server would be down.

  30. Gotta love the format of the article by British · · Score: 3, Funny

    has an interesting 24 page PDF available c

    Wouldn't it be more appropriate, and just as taxing of resources to have the report in a Shockwave object that bounces around on your screen with embedded video and a 2-pixel wide "close" button?

    I mean that is what 10 years of online adverising has mutated to.

  31. Re:I will sum up the last 10 years of ads in 2 wor by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1, Funny

    I will sum up the last 10 years of ads in 2 words: Increasingly annoying.

    And the marketing division of DoubleClick as "a bunch of mindless jerks who'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes."

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  32. Quick everybody download the PDF! by bogie · · Score: 0

    /. the fuckers!

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    1. Re:Quick everybody download the PDF! by nigham · · Score: 1

      Apparently its working. Trying to download the PDF... 10 hours remaining. Not bad for a decade's history, I guess.

      --
      I don't want to read /. I want to go home and re-think my life.
  33. I wonder.... by dteichman2 · · Score: 1

    Can I add this article to Spam Vampire?

    --


    Silence is golden... and duct tape is silver.
  34. Was Hotwired really the first? by Stormwatch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Brazilian advertiser Luli Radfahrer, in his book "Design/Web/Design", claimed to have created the first banner ad ever.

  35. Re:I will sum up the last 10 years of ads in 2 wor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... why do i need wait for the revoloution (all Hitchikers quotes aside) , if they hapen to be in international waters the same time as me and some riffles* wink wink*n then you know accidents hapen

  36. It's funny by Holi · · Score: 1

    I would check out the PDF but I am currently uploading an 85 meg ad for a new product.

    Don't get mad at me it's for a magazine.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    1. Re:It's funny by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      An 85mb advert for a magazine must include some serious use of flash ;)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:It's funny by Gamzarme · · Score: 0

      Would that be 1&1 Web Hosting?

      I know it only takes up 10 or 11 pages in my Maximum PC mag every month...

      --
      Pat
    3. Re:It's funny by Holi · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately I can't get the animation to work once it's down on paper.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    4. Re:It's funny by Holi · · Score: 1

      No, actually it's for Windsurfing Magazine. I am the US Distributor for Gun Sails, it was an ad for one of our latest sails. Just a 1 page full bleed.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  37. Headline got my hopes up by eyeball · · Score: 3, Funny

    I misinterpreted the headline as "Report on [this being the] Last Decade of Online Advertising." It really got my hopes up.

    --

    _______
    2B1ASK1
  38. Connection refused... by MadMan2 · · Score: 1

    Don't know how it's for you around other parts of the world, but Belgian users are getting "Connection refused"!

    I've never thought to see that happen! Yezzzzzzz :-D ./ for sainthood!

    --

    Peace & Long Life,
    MadMan-2
  39. It's worth a look... by MarkusQ · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's worth a look, if only for an insight into how far the technology has come in the last ten years. I never suspected you could embed pop-up ads in a PDF.

    --MarkusQ

    1. Re:It's worth a look... by Gatton · · Score: 1
      It's worth a look, if only for an insight into how far the technology has come in the last ten years. I never suspected you could embed pop-up ads in a PDF.

      Obviously you and I are simply incapable of stooping to their level of evil.

    2. Re:It's worth a look... by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      That indicates how far the technology (PDFs in this case) has regressed.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  40. Last Decade of Online Advertising by utexaspunk · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's "Last" as in final, right?

    We can only hope...

    1. Re:Last Decade of Online Advertising by Hatta · · Score: 1

      And I thought it was the first decade of online advertising.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Last Decade of Online Advertising by Subliminal+Fusion · · Score: 1

      Only if you want to start paying micropayments for every page view (ie- slashdot subscriptions except for the whole internet, with no way to view free content unless it was a promotional site for a product/service that you had to pay for...)

  41. So the history of advertising is only doubleclick? by mcguyver · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This article fails to mention any company other than Doubleclick as being involved in online advertising. It's naive to think that any 10 page marketing document produce by Doubleclick would be about anything other than Doubleclick however the title of this article is the history of online advertising over the last decade. Give any college student a day and they surely could come up with something far superior to this narcissistic press release.

  42. Cool by Projectlinux · · Score: 1

    This looks interesting for those of us that are into online ads anyway!

  43. Can it last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As someone who has worked for several major media companies I am truly worried whether the current online ad boom (beyond dot-com peaks as the Doubleclick PDF shows) can continue.

    A great number of the ads sold these days are text ads, with Google the biggest seller. These ads are great because they are far less obtrusive for the user and the advertiser only pays per click. Many advertisers have been very happy with them, including lots of small businesses in once-small niches who have found loads more customers.

    But as we've seen in the last few months text ads can be gamed. Your competitor might set up a botnet to "click" your ad, stealing dollars from you, and you might never know. Or the same competitor can hire real live humans from impovrished countries to do the same thing.

    Also, even mighty Google has not been able to effectively stop link spam and SEO manipulation of the "regular" search results. Will people really keep advertising when they can be in the main search results section for possibly less money?

    Then there are the ad blockers you Slashdotters are so fond of. Not only do they screen big banner ads, many of them screen out text ads as well. This is a niche technology but then so was pop-up blocking a year or two ago, now it is being built into IE. As Firefox gains traction I expect ad blocking to increase.

    Then you've got the user registration schemes and technical route-arounds like bugmenot.com. The whole point of online advertising is being able to target certain customers, but users are sick of filling out registration forms and leery of being tracked in any way so we're seeing more technical tools to defeat the raison d'etre of online ads, targeting.

    These are not truths anyone can get paid or respected for saying right now, so no one is saying them. But that does not make them any less valid. Online advertising is probably here to stay but there are a lot of kinks to work out before it becomes more troublesome and expensive for businesses or users to game the system than to accept the ads.

  44. 1985-1994 by Reignking · · Score: 1

    I can sum up online advertising about the decade before the one that this article is written about. Done.

    --
    One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
  45. Report on Last Decade of Online Advertising by Matey-O · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I'd hoped this meant an end to Advertising (the LAST Decade of Advertising).

    Alas, I was wrong.

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  46. And heres by jrushton · · Score: 1

    all of my personal details....

  47. If only HotWired had patented online ads... by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 1

    and refused to license it.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  48. Not just grrrr but brrrr by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    If it helps at all, opt out at the top of the page. You'll still have a cookie, but, in theory, it instructs them not to track you.

    Ah, and we should trust them why?

    Seriously, even if they got /.'d, the number of cookies now on innocent computers just went way up.

    Next time, point me to a link on a public site.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Not just grrrr but brrrr by DogDude · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Can you give me one, solid, ACTUAL (not made up) bad thing that can happen to you because of a cookie on your personal PC? Just one. I'd love to hear just one. I'm also curious as to whether or not it'll involve Elvis or aliens...

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    2. Re:Not just grrrr but brrrr by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "Can you give me one, solid, ACTUAL (not made up) bad thing that can happen to you because of a cookie on your personal PC? Just one. I'd love to hear just one."

      That's the thing about privacy though. I don't need to give one. I don't even need to HAVE one. If I want my privacy, that is enough.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  49. advertising degree: three easy steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. buy our product or your could die
    2. buy our product and you will be sexy
    3. buy our product, buy our product, buy our product (repeat as many times as possible in as annoying a manner as possible)

    congratulations, here is your diploma.

    (buy our product)

  50. Don't worry.. by LordSnooty · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's the Coral cache should the worst happen, and Doubleclick get /.ed.. That should help out those with the hosts file protection, but not those with adblock stuff that pick out D-Click and the like from content, which maddeningly I fell for ... for a few minutes anyway. UGH! Slashdot has ads?!?

    On that point - since I'm the kind that deploys ad-blocking measures, and having skimmed the report and seen mention of "impressions", I hope they don't count the likes of me as someone who consumes their ads. Even when I'm on a browser that isn't covered in tinfoil, my eyes tend to keep clear by themselves. How can they class me as a pair of eyeballs? Every "page impression" statistic they publish should be annotated with the following: "All figures inclusive of 20% who use adblocking tech, and 25% who just take no notice"

  51. Online by Sv-Manowar · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Online advertising is coming back in, companies were still afraid of the internet due to the "dotcom bust" a few years ago. This can also be seen if you analyse the domain name market, prices have been rising steadily for the last year, and record prices are being reached

    People are starting to realise the profitability of the internet, again.

  52. adblock by akira69 · · Score: 1

    I bet nothing in this page will load; I Adblocked *doubleclick* a long time ago! Firefox rocks.

  53. HAHAHA by AviLazar · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I clicked on the article and got a white page with "Joe was Here". For a moment I thought one of you hacked into doubleclick, then I realized it was my boss who modified my localhost default.htm file for fun one day :)

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  54. In-game ads... by SharpFang · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's still a huge untapped ad space. Inside the games.
    All the games along the race tracks seem to be some made up products and ads for the game producers. Posters on the walls in FPS games, billboards over Vice City, all that stuff is filled with fake commercials.
    It could be filled with real ones though.
    The question is only "when"...

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:In-game ads... by Reignking · · Score: 1

      When? How about a few weeks ago, in Anarchy Online?

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    2. Re:In-game ads... by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 1

      It's already starting to happen. I know that Need for Speed: Underground, for example, had paid-for real life advertising on its billboards.

    3. Re:In-game ads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't played a recent racing game, have you?

    4. Re:In-game ads... by xilet · · Score: 1

      I need to ask, what is the problem with this. A while back for GTA3 for the computer I put on a mod that made all of the cars real models/names including things like pepsi trucks and such. Seeing those going around actully did add to the game since it helped make it feel more real. When used as they are in their real life counterparts [side of busses, billboards, etc] they can add a good bit to a movie/game/etc in terms of realisim. Product placement where it otherwise would not be part of the game is another matter [ET anyone?]. It adds to the realism, but it also says something about our society when things don't quite seem real if they don't have advertising.

  55. How dare they leave out SPAM by davidwr · · Score: 1

    From the USENET Green Card Lottery spam of '94 to the spew currently flooding my inbox, no True History Of Online Advertising would be complete without spending at least a few pages on the evils of spam.

    This document mentions spam only twice.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  56. The Spam heard round the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's never forget the people who first brought spam to Usenet, the Green Card Lawyers.

  57. For some reason... by Sairret · · Score: 1

    Doubleclick.com has an interesting 24 page PDF...

    That just seems unpossible. Seriously, 24 pages about banner ads and popups?

  58. Re:First Banner Ad Blocker 199x, Cookie Blocker 19 by payamchee · · Score: 2, Informative

    Before getting started way-back-when, Kevin O'Conner (Chairman, and once CEO) and Dwight Merriman (CTO) of DoubleClick itself forecasted that people would map an advertiser's domain name to 127.0.0.1 in their hosts file to avoid ads, and that people would create ad blockers and cookie blockers.

  59. Get the PDF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Bash:
    while true; do wget --no-clobber --delete-after http://www.doubleclick.com/us/knowledge_central/do cuments/RESEARCH/dc_decaderinonline_0504.pdf; done
  60. Re:One would also *think* qaulity would matter... by EtherAlchemist · · Score: 3, Interesting


    After 10 years you would think the quality of ads would improve as well.

    Take for example those debt consolidation and mortgage/refinance ads you see all over. Oh, not sure which ones? You know- the ones that feature a dancing cobra or a giant corn on the cob or a long fat pig, all with the abbreviations for the 50 states on them. Yeah! That's what those ads are for! Nothing says "trustworthy, serious company, capable of handling your financial information" like a pig or cobra! A cobra! Jebus, who the hell makes up this company's demographic?

    At least X-10 had ads relevant to the product, they didn't even pretend- remember the panning cameras that had the ad that panned up and down the chick in the pool?

    Then you've got what the ad-sales people at my company call "bottom feeders." These are the Gators, Fun Web Products (you know them, Smiley Central, among others) and ad space resellers. God how I loathe this tier of advertising.

    What I don't understand though, is how people (read: the ad geniuses) at these companies can seriously think that their cheesy ass ads will ACTUALLY draw customers.

    --
    R(k)
  61. Re:I will sum up the last 10 years of ads in 2 wor by DickBreath · · Score: 2, Funny

    Surely DoubleClick will be further down the list than, say, SCO, Spammers, Microsoft, RIAA, MPAA, etc.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  62. Re:One would also *think* qaulity would matter... by MynockGuano · · Score: 4, Funny
    From the post...

    What I don't understand though, is how people (read: the ad geniuses) at these companies can seriously think that their cheesy ass ads will ACTUALLY draw customers.

    ...and from the sig:

    Get a free iPod, I did

    Words fail here.

  63. Re:One would also *think* qaulity would matter... by CSMastermind · · Score: 1

    The content and quality of the ads is changing. If you read the article you'd know that the internet penertrated homes faster than any communications medium, in only 7 years it was in 50% of US homes.

    Advertising soon followed but when you have growth that rapid you develop what we call in economics an expansionary gap. Because of this, once the internet was first used for advertising tons up copy-cats popped up. Inovation and we were caught in a process of technological lag. More advanced tools are being generated (with the advent fo java, shockwave, and the widespread adapation of broadband internet) and now that internet advertising is a viable medium major companies are starting to look into the options. This will eventually lead to better quality advertising as well as more polished ads.

  64. Re:One would also *think* qaulity would matter... by MynockGuano · · Score: 1

    "This will eventually lead to better quality advertising as well as more polished ads."

    There's a contradiction in terms in that sentence somewhere...

  65. obligatory hosts file posting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Block most ads and user tracking by means of a hosts file like the one at someonewhocares.org.

  66. That *helps* them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That resource is cachable. All you do when you repeatedly request it is ensure that it stays in your ISP's cache for much longer than it would otherwise do. Which, in turn, means that other users of that cache will end up retrieving a cached copy when otherwise they might have downloaded a fresh copy (it having expired from the cache).

  67. Font Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those that haven't read the article, there appears to be some sort of font problem (at least for me).

    A sample:
    "Last year we introduced e eareerser our mostdownloaded report to dateand since mid we have been issuing our areryerreer ."

    This was in the margin, so it's probably an interesting quote:
    "earersas eaayse sersaaers re eereray earsera eaeasaya aayars erases"

    Fascinating!

  68. Please, please PLEASE! by sconeu · · Score: 1

    Let it really be the LAST Decade of online advertising!!!!

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:Please, please PLEASE! by MykeBNY · · Score: 1

      Oh, I know, the title got my hopes up so much. u_u;

  69. Self advertising != fact by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Why read what is obviously going to be a very biased bunch of bullshit. I can paraphrase without even RTFA:

    Online advertising works. It is highly effective and low-cost. This is the only way to sell your product to millions of people.

    People love to get up to date information on your products so that they can buy them.

    Double click are the people to deal with. We already have a great relationship with web surfers and we're the only way to go.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Self advertising != fact by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      While I agree that this is obviously a PR piece for DoubleClick (look at all the buzz around this article), don't flame them unnecessarily.

      Online advertising DOES work, and it IS highly effective and low-cost. Or are you going to completely ignore the roaring success of Google and Amazon, et al.

      Like it or not, it works, and its here to stay. Thankfully, us geeks know how to deal with it, so all we have to do is come on /. and whine about it.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  70. That was a joke, son by adb · · Score: 1

    I don't actually block ads other than by turning off window-manipulation JavaScript functions. If a site has ads that annoy me, I go somewhere else. But the hosts file hack is a Slashdotnik shibboleth.

  71. For the first time... by nocaster · · Score: 0

    I'll bet there is little chance of this site getting slashdotted since the story is at doubleclick.

  72. why stop there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Block most advertisers with a nice big hosts file.

  73. up next: microsoft's history of modern computing by sum.zero · · Score: 1

    this is pure advertorial by doubleclick.

    sum.zero

  74. Re:One would also *think* qaulity would matter... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

    can seriously think that their cheesy ass ads will ACTUALLY draw customers.

    Apparently they do though. Once again, a small minority of stupid people (people who believe ads that clearly lie, people who respond to spam, Neilsen families, Congress...) determine what the rest of us get saddled with.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  75. Mahir - I KISS YOU! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i loved the reference to Mahir on one of the graphs. It was quite a phenomenon, with dozens of tribute pages popping up with photoshopped pics from Mahir's site.

    Mine was ma-harvey-ir

  76. SPAM, SPIM, SPVOIP and now SPRPC by MavEtJu · · Score: 1

    I was doing some network traces yesterday, and found these in the captured packets. Destination host is a Cisco 2821:

    After spam via email, spam via instant messaging and spam via voice-over-ip, the next big thing is.... spam via the MS-RPC protocol! Check the following network traces:

    U 61.235.154.101:57710 -> 202.83.178.14:1027
    ..SECURITY..ALERT..Microsoft Windows has encounted an Internal Error
    Your windows registry is corrupted.
    Microsoft recommends an immediate system scan.
    visit
    http://e-regfix.com
    to repair.
    .
    #
    U 61.152.158.123:32780 -> 202.83.178.14:1026
    ..SECURITY..ALERT..SECURITY ALERT : Windows has detected 10 Spyware programs installed on your computer!

    Spyware causes pop up messages , tracks your online activities and displays advertisements.
    Your Anti-Virus and Firewall will not remove Spyware.
    Visit: www.antieye.com for free removal information!
    .

    Bunch of sad-sad-sad persons....

    --
    bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
    1. Re:SPAM, SPIM, SPVOIP and now SPRPC by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      Windows Messenger Spam. Not. Exactly. New.

      It's been going on for years. Just spammers taking advantage of one of the most retarded design decisions Microsoft ever made.

      Oh how I long for those heady days in July 2003 when the RPC DCOM exploit was out but no-one had bothered to patch. I spent many a happy evening just sitting there watching the output of tcpdump as the messenger spams came in and then firing back one single packet. And then silence. Or Goatse on their desktop, depending on whether I picked the right offset for their version of Windows.

  77. Re:One would also *think* qaulity would matter... by dangitman · · Score: 3, Funny
    Nothing says "trustworthy, serious company, capable of handling your financial information" like a pig or cobra! A cobra! Jebus, who the hell makes up this company's demographic?

    You see ... Most folk'll never click a pig, but then again some folk'll ... Like Cletus the Slack-Jawed Yokel...

    "Hey, I can call my Ma from this internet thingamy. HEY MA! GET OFF THE DANG ROOF!"

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  78. Re:One would also *think* qaulity would matter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What ads!

  79. Grown Men Cry by tpengster · · Score: 1

    Figure 2, A brief history of online advertising, is a timeline. Interestingly, at 9/11/01 there is marker that says "Grown Men Cry". Anyone else find this a bit odd for a "professional" publication?

    1. Re:Grown Men Cry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I was working at Doubleclick on 9/11. There was a panic as everyone was frantically trying to deactivate all of the airline advertisements.

  80. Re:First Banner Ad Blocker 199x, Cookie Blocker 19 by xander2032 · · Score: 1

    I find blocking cookies causes annoying problems with sites you need to log into. They all require the evil things! So since I login a lot, I just have Mozilla and Opera delete my cookies when I exit the browser.

    Before that I would have a batch file delete my cookies. I still have the old batch file, now I just use it for deleting my cache and other files.

    I just feel better with those things deleted. ;)

  81. Re:I will sum up the last 10 years of ads in 2 wor by DreamerFi · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Ford!"

    Ford looked up from where he was sitting in a corner humming to himself. He always found the actual travelling-through-space part of space travel rather trying.

    "Yeah?" he said.

    "If you're a researcher on this book thing and you were on Earth, you must have been gathering material on advertising."

    "Well, I was able to extend the original entry a bit, yes."

    "Let me see what it says in this edition then, I've got to see it."

    "Yeah OK." He passed it over again.

    Arthur grabbed hold of it and tried to stop his hands shaking. He pressed the entry for the relevant page. The screen flashed and swirled and resolved into a page of print. Arthur stared at it.

    "It doesn't have an entry!" he burst out.

    Ford looked over his shoulder.

    "Yes it does," he said, "down there, see at the bottom of the screen, just under Eccentrica Gallumbits, the triple-breasted whore of Eroticon 6."

    Arthur followed Ford's finger, and saw where it was pointing. For a moment it still didn't register, then his mind nearly blew up.

    "What? Annoying? Is that all it's got to say? Annoying! One word!"

    Ford shrugged.

    "Well, there are a hundred billion stars in the Galaxy, and only a limited amount of space in the book's microprocessors," he said, "and no one knew much about advertising of course."

    "Well for God's sake I hope you managed to rectify that a bit."

    "Oh yes, well I managed to transmit a new entry off to the editor. He had to trim it a bit, but it's still an improvement."

    "And what does it say now?" asked Arthur.

    "Increasingly annoying," admitted Ford with a slightly embarrassed cough.

  82. The End by neoThoth · · Score: 1

    At least as far as I'm concerned. I've been using adblock (an extension for firefox) and I literally don't see ads anymore. Oh sure a few manage to find their way in but 90% are now gone. It's incredible and the way the web should be viewed, sans ads!

  83. Re:One would also *think* qaulity would matter... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    Give it a chance. Online advertising is still in its painful growing stages, and keep in mind that its a much more accelerated pace than print, radio, or TV.

    The thing about the growth of it though is that it will come gradually in individual examples, and then there will be a push towards better work in general. An example of recent "good" online campaigns are the BMW Films. Not annoyingly intrusive, entertaining, and not pushy on the sales end.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  84. la la laaaah, not listening, fingers in ears. by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    doubleclick's been in my hosts as resolving to 127.0.0.1 for *years*. ever since those flashing epilepsy-inducing ads they used to run. i am struggling to see how blocking everything from doubleclick could possibly inconvenience me in the slightest. you mean i can't read their puff-pieces about how great they are? boo-hyphen-hoo.

  85. Your silence is telling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't answer the question because you *do*, in fact, work for a spam operation.