Slashdot Mirror


Google Maps, Local Expand To UK

Koushiro writes "From Google's official blog comes word that Google Maps UK and Google Local UK have been launched, confirming speculations that the search engine giant would continue to expand its regional services to an international audience. The seemingly logical next step, of course, would be to expand coverage to Western Europe, but given the input Google's UK office had into this project, can we expect Google Maps India next?"

373 comments

  1. Waving up at you :wave: by Freexe · · Score: 1, Funny
    --
    "In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell
    1. Re:Waving up at you :wave: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops, was that you who just got runned over by that car?

    2. Re:Waving up at you :wave: by DJCF · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Waving up at you :wave: by madaxe42 · · Score: 1

      You live just round the corner from me.... I live near the Hurlingham.

    4. Re:Waving up at you :wave: by Yorrike · · Score: 1
      In Feburary 2000, after a night of solid drinking, I threw up here:
      http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=53.144966,-2.360878 &spn=0.004089,0.005161&hl=en

      Take that Cheshire!

      --

      Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

    5. Re:Waving up at you :wave: by Gid1 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's weird. You're about a block from me.

    6. Re:Waving up at you :wave: by madaxe42 · · Score: 1

      I had no idea so many geeks lived in SW london! :D

    7. Re:Waving up at you :wave: by zasos · · Score: 1

      going to London at the end of May and finally I can search for a hotel in london with a dissent map...
      btw, anyone know of a nice B&B near Camden Town / King's Cross?

      --

      Just because I don't care, it doesn't mean I don't understand. Homer J. Simpson
  2. UKIP Victory! by philbowman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mr Kilroy-Silk will be pleased. Just go look at Britain, and zoom right out ([-] button). Look - no Europe! Just us Brits and our American fiends.

    --
    Phil
    1. Re:UKIP Victory! by gowen · · Score: 5, Informative

      Kilroy Silk isn't in UKIP anymore. He's formed his own party "Veritas".

      The name comes from the latin : "Verity" meaning "True" and "Ass", meaning "Robert Kilroy Silk".

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    2. Re:UKIP Victory! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Veritas - Latin for "truth" - would avoid the old parties' "lies and spin"

      Good job there is no political spin on this comment or he would have to come and kick yer ass.

    3. Re:UKIP Victory! by cozzano · · Score: 2, Informative

      You misspelt 'Tit' as 'Mr'

    4. Re:UKIP Victory! by iainl · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, he says that he named it Veritas to signify that they're plain speaking.

      Because nothing says 'plain speaking' like a bit of Latin.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    5. Re:UKIP Victory! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My god yes, he will be pleased.

      Now if they could just make the map bulge a bit to show how Britain is "bursting at the seems" with Gypsies and asylum seekers!

    6. Re:UKIP Victory! by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Funny
      He's formed his own party "Veritas".

      I think you'll find it's spelled 'Vanitas'...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    7. Re:UKIP Victory! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wanted to steal a more obscure joke that that ;)

      I think mine was from "The Now Show".

      OP

    8. Re:UKIP Victory! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Ireland!!! Were also there and were not part of UK.

    9. Re:UKIP Victory! by AndrewRUK · · Score: 1

      Your post reminded me of a song about Kilroy-Silk, Hey, Mr Tangerine Man, and made me smile :-) (They've also done a theme song for Veritas, although be warned, that one contains gratuitous use of kazoos...)

    10. Re:UKIP Victory! by feargal · · Score: 1

      Er, see that little land-mass between the U.K. and the rest of the Atlantic Ocean? That's Ireland.

      I'll assume you're from the U.S. yourself and accept that as an excuse for being geographically challenged.

      Unless you're from Canada, in which case I'll still assume you're from the U.s.; the level of insult is equivalent.

      --
      "A goldfish was his muse, eternally amused"
    11. Re:UKIP Victory! by Taladar · · Score: 1

      I believe that one is called Oceania

    12. Re:UKIP Victory! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, see that little land-mass between the U.K. and the rest of the Atlantic Ocean? That's Ireland.

      The full name of the UK is in fact "The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland"

    13. Re:UKIP Victory! by T-Kir · · Score: 0

      Tell you what, look near Dover... there is the "road" to nowhere in the English Channel! :-D

      --
      Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
    14. Re:UKIP Victory! by philbowman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, but the whole of the Island of Ireland is included in the maps, both Northern Ireland (part of the UK) and Eire (a separate country). I apologise to the Irish for not being completely correct in my posting WHEN MAKING A JOKE! Same about the UKIP / Kilroy stuff I know he left the party but I really couldn't be bothered to remember the name of the new lot. BTW, I am British so I am insulted by being called American. Call me Canadian and I wouldn't care :-) Those Canucks are cool, eh! Go Habs! The Isles of Scilly are there too (which I think are ours), but not the Channel Islands (which are sort of ours but kind of independant too). None of it's painted red, anyway... So, sorry everyone. I will check my facts better before posting.

      --
      Phil
    15. Re:UKIP Victory! by philbowman · · Score: 1
      I'll preview my post too to check formatting ;-)

      Yes, but the whole of the Island of Ireland is included in the maps, both Northern Ireland (part of the UK) and Eire (a separate country). I apologise to the Irish for not being completely correct in my posting WHEN MAKING A JOKE!

      Same about the UKIP / Kilroy stuff I know he left the party but I really couldn't be bothered to remember the name of the new lot.

      BTW, I am British so I am insulted by being called American. Call me Canadian and I wouldn't care :-) Those Canucks are cool, eh! Go Habs!

      The Isles of Scilly are there too (which I think are ours), but not the Channel Islands (which are sort of ours but kind of independant too). None of it's painted red, anyway...

      So, sorry everyone. I will check my facts better before posting.

      --
      Phil
    16. Re:UKIP Victory! by DrXym · · Score: 2, Informative

      The UKIP needn't worry though. The party is replete with arseholes, bigots, eccentrics, xenophobes and nutcases.

    17. Re:UKIP Victory! by tehshen · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was looking at the "Veritas Manifesto" and thought "Is it all going to be in Latin?"

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    18. Re:UKIP Victory! by mr_tommy · · Score: 1

      To quote Paul Merton (Have I Got News For You) : "There's never a bucket of shit around when you need one..."!

    19. Re:UKIP Victory! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Private Eye have taken to calling it "Veritarse"

      I hear Veritas, makers of enterprise software such as NetBackup, were mifed by The Orange Ones chosen party name.

    20. Re:UKIP Victory! by TDyl · · Score: 1

      They must be using data from M$ for the mapping.

      --
      Todd: I hope it proves as delicious as the farmers that grew them
    21. Re:UKIP Victory! by dani317 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well its all greek to me.

    22. Re:UKIP Victory! by gowen · · Score: 1
      Same about the UKIP / Kilroy stuff I know he left the party but I really couldn't be bothered to remember the name of the new lot.
      I only corrected you as an excuse to use my stolen joke, and therefore appear funnier than I really am.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    23. Re:UKIP Victory! by Alephcat · · Score: 1

      no, if you look closely that is the channel tunnel, it is just a bad way of showing it

    24. Re:UKIP Victory! by Laurence0 · · Score: 1

      More interestingly, the UK appears to be larger than Texas...

    25. Re:UKIP Victory! by mrsev · · Score: 3, Funny

      The bastards, how dare they; they are feeding off the very lifeblood of the Conservative party.

    26. Re:UKIP Victory! by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      Posting of the day for me. Very good.

    27. Re:UKIP Victory! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If nothing else, at least UKIP has given the British public the entertainment of watching the Conservatives swing even further to the right in an attempt to find a key policy they can use to grab column inches with.

      Even the fake posters arn't too far from the real ones!

    28. Re:UKIP Victory! by ostermei · · Score: 1
      Just us Brits and our American fiends.
      He's an impostor! The British are supposed to be the ones that like us over there!
      --
      "Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read." -- Groucho Marx
    29. Re:UKIP Victory! by crooksm · · Score: 1

      And according to Radio 4 - he doesn't know his Veritas from his elbow!

    30. Re:UKIP Victory! by dizzyduck · · Score: 1

      He's an impostor! The British are supposed to be the ones that like us over there!

      Not so much anymore.
      --
      Allergy advice: Contains eggs.
    31. Re:UKIP Victory! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    32. Re:UKIP Victory! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. We have the entertainment of watching Tony Blair get back in power with no decent alternatives. Hilarious.

    33. Re:UKIP Victory! by tehshen · · Score: 1

      That's awfully early for a show on Fridays and Saturdays...

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    34. Re:UKIP Victory! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The UKIP needn't worry though. The party is replete with arseholes, bigots, eccentrics, xenophobes and nutcases.

      Yes, but what about Veritas?

    35. Re:UKIP Victory! by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Robert Kilroy Silk. Need I say more?

    36. Re:UKIP Victory! by goober1473 · · Score: 1

      But what is on the Isle of Man?

  3. Satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    But no Satellite mapping as yet... Still playing catchup.

    1. Re:Satellite by buro9 · · Score: 1
      Not quite, satellite maps of the UK have been online for years:
      Multimap

      Google != first to everything.

      They just do it better when they get there... kinda similar to Apple I suppose.

    2. Re:Satellite by gnalre · · Score: 1

      Its a pity they cannot do a deal with getmapping.com to provide detailed images.

      That would rock!

      --
      Choose your allies carefully, it is highly unlikely you will be held accountable for the actions of your enemies
    3. Re:Satellite by double-oh+three · · Score: 1

      But the apparently have subway stations included on their streetmaps, which the US maps don't have. As a non-driver, I would rather have the subways on there than the satalite images. The images are cool, but subway stations would be more useful.

      --
      "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
    4. Re:Satellite by cybergibbons · · Score: 1

      They aren't satellite images, they are aerial photos, taken from a plane.

    5. Re:Satellite by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      if WorldWind at nasa has access to the WHOLE PLANET, and KEYHOLE has aswell (which google bought), then they will DO the whole planet soon, they have to.

      Since keywhole did mars too, I wonder if google will do a mars.google.com and for fun, overlay the rovers tracks on it and its realtime 'faked' position visually ;)

      But check http://www.hot-maps.de/index.html

      they do London too and I think its a cool interface that has realtime drag/zoom on it.

      (Damn the 2min wait timer is lame, listen slashdooters, make better logic, 30second diff, 3rd post 60sec, 4th post, 90sec, reset every 30min.)

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    6. Re:Satellite by smallguy78 · · Score: 1

      Powered by yell - how do Yell make money from this? Surely it's diverting people away from their site, which means less effective advertising.

      Sure, google pay them, but I can't imagine it'd match the advertising revenue, the whole basis of their online business model.

      --
      Nothing costs nothing
    7. Re:Satellite by gorre · · Score: 1

      This only seems to cover England, well at least they don't have areal photos of Scotland anyway.

      --
      "Madness is something rare in individuals - but in groups, parties, peoples, ages it is the rule." -- Nietzsche
  4. OK, I'm impressed. by Darkon · · Score: 3, Funny


    It even found my local chippy. Go Google!

    1. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by gowen · · Score: 1

      Damn. Mine isn't on. Imagine suggesting I need to go all the way to Silverdale for a fish supper.

      World leader in search engine technology, my ass. :)

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    2. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by gowen · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because you had to know the address of the chipshop to get that URL.

      Google found on the basis of "Find a chippy near my house."

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    4. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by Darkon · · Score: 1


      Why is this impressive again?

      It's impressive because Google simply required the place name and the text "fish+chips". As far as I can see the MSN site needs you to already know the address of the fish & chip shop.

    5. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by antdude · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are those colored freeways for traffic speed status? I have never seen those in U.S. maps especially in Southern CA area.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    6. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by cortana · · Score: 1

      Also the map is tiny and slow to scroll. Google's one fills to your browser window.

    7. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by timthorn · · Score: 4, Informative
      The colour is for the road status - in the UK we have motorways (eg M1, M25), other trunk roads (A class and B class, eg A41 or B4096), and other roads. Motorways are usually blue, A roads usually red or green, and B roads usually orange. Motorways are almost all 70mph, A roads vary from 40 to 70, and B roads from 30 to 60.

      The road numbering started out as loosely based on which direction from London the road heads. The M1 goes north from London, as does the A1. The A11 is a bit further around, the A110 further still. I'm sure there's a website somewhere that explains the numbering better.

    8. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by iainl · · Score: 1

      Not speed, just major and minor roads.

      White = 'local' road, through yellow for main roads, up to the green "A" highways, and if you expand out a touch you'll see a blue Motorway (our equivalent of freeways).

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    9. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by antdude · · Score: 1

      Ahhh thanks!

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    10. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by pklong · · Score: 1

      "I couldn't find the freeway and had to take some little back road called the M5"

      Green A roads are Trunk route and maintainance is paid by the Highways agency (I think) rather than the local councils.

      More on the speed (only for cars lorrys, busses, caravans etc. have lower limits). Road type doesn't matter.

      Motorways are always 70mph unless signposted.

      The Speed limit in urban areas (having street lighting not more than 200 yards apart) is 30mph unless signposted.

      Outside urban areas:

      Dual Carrageways are 70mph, Single Carriageways 60mph. Lower speed limits must be signposted and repeated every 200 yards (with small signs)

      But there are so many signs everywhere in the UK now a speed limit sign will be near...

      More here

      --

      Philip

      Signatures are broken

    11. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      And what's wrong with Silverdale? I'll have you know both my parents were born in Jamland. Even if there was only one power line into the village, and so the mains voltage went down at predictable times {kettles going on for cups of tea, water heaters coming on, and so forth} -- it just made the TV picture shrink a bit.

      How do I set it to show distances in km?

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    12. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by TG1 · · Score: 0

      Mine too

      http://local.google.co.uk/local?q=the+codfather& hl =en&lr=&sa=G&near=biggleswade&sc=1&radius=0&latlng =52087260,-266465,1082925214303507644

      Such an obvious name.

    13. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by Molt · · Score: 1

      Google UK obtain their business address data from Yell, and Madeley's fine(?) chippie is missing from there too.

      Maybe they have things to hide and don't want to be found? Could the chippie be a front for something more sinister? I think the public have a right to know!

      --
      404 Not Found: No such file or resource as '.sig'
    14. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never seen those maps in the US? ESPECIALLY in SC? What the fuck does that mean, especially? Does it mean that you don't get them in the US but in SC you REALLY don't get them? How can something that doesn't exist somehow exist even less? Weapons of mass distruction my arse!

    15. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by g_attrill · · Score: 2, Informative

      The UK road numbering system is explained nicely on this page.

      Also good for information is: www.uk-roads.co.uk

    16. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by Jack+Taylor · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hmm, it didn't find mine, although I did see this interesting Google Ad:

      Fish And Chips
      Aff. Huge selection, great deals on
      Fish And Chips.
      eBay.co.uk

      This is still miles ahead of yell.co.uk though :)

      --
      One good turn - gets all the covers.
    17. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by m50d · · Score: 4, Informative

      They're numbered in a spiral out from London. The A1 goes north to edinburgh along the east coast, A2 into kent, A3 south to portsmouth, A4 to wales and A5 to Birmingham, with the A6 going north to Edinburgh (historically) by the west coast. Then the A7 goes south from Edinburgh to meet the A6, the A8 goes west to Glasgow, and the A9 north to Inverness. Then coming back to London we have the A10 up to Cambridge, the A11 out towards Norwich, A12 to Ipswich, A13 out to Chelmsford, A14 confusingly elsewhere, but then A15 going more southerly and so on until we get to A69, all of these starting gradually further from the dome of St Paul's which is taken as the centre of London. After this the A70-A99 are numbered in a spiral from Edinburgh, A100-699 from London and so on. The green ones are primary routes, in rare cases B roads can also be green roads, and link up a set of "primary destinations". Generally these are straighter and faster roads than the red ones, with more service stations, etc. B roads (which are normally yellow rather than orange) are numbered similarly, but motorways are different, instead taking the number of the nearby A road. Thus there are plenty of gaps in the motorway numbering, for example there is an M20 but no M19, and the M5 starts nowhere near London, it's just long and vaguely near the A5. Also, when an A road is upgraded to a motorway it keeps its name, just with a (M) afterwards, so we have the A1(M) for large sections of the A1 route.

      --
      I am trolling
    18. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by mcrusty · · Score: 1

      And they can even tell you how to drive there from the Shetland Islands

    19. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by Neophytus · · Score: 1

      Also, when an A road is upgraded to a motorway it keeps its name, just with a (M) afterwards, so we have the A1(M) for large sections of the A1 route.

      That's just to distinguish it from the M1 - the A8 has been progressively upgraded to the M8 for a long time now, and the parts that gain motorway status become M8. If the A1 was ever upgraded to motorway throughout (would be good if it was.. but it would be money much better spent elsewhere) I'm sure it would be redesignated with it's own number.

    20. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      roads with a (M) suffix, like the A1(M) and the A3(M) and motorway class A roads and not actually motorways. This means that the standard motorway laws don't apply (like cycling on them for instance). I know that when the A3 was widened and upgraded they tried to get it re-classed as a motorway but were denied, just as well really as this road has urban streets leading off of it.

    21. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      The Ax(M) roads certainly are motorways, with motorway regulations applying. You will typically notice a sign saying, "Motorway ahead, non-motorway traffic leave at next junction" on roads such as the A1 just before it turns into the A1(M).

      There are motorway-class A roads to which motorway regulations do not apply, but they are just called the Ax, instead of the Ax(M). An obvious example is the A282, the road which connects Essex and Kent and which is often mistaken for the M25. It looks like a motorway, has a hard shoulder and everything, but the road signs are green instead of blue, and if you are suitably insane you can try cycling on it. You can't cycle on the A1(M).

      You'll notice that stretches of A-road which are upgraded to motorways always have a parallel route, often constructed out of one of the carriageways of the original A-road, precisely for traffic which is not allowed on motorways. The A1000 in Hertfordshire (shown here in yellow) is a good example.

    22. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never been to the UK, but I'd have always thought that your driving speeds would be in metric.

    23. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by Asterisk · · Score: 1

      Those blue dotted lines in the sea are ferry routes.

    24. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You live in Frimley? poor bugger, I used to work across the road. Cycling round the frimley roundabout - thats something I don't miss!

    25. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      It even found my local chippy. Go Google!

      Yeah, except it'll be slashdotted so you won't be able to buy any until next week!

    26. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      The numbering isn't entirely sequential. All roads that start between the A1 and the A2 will begin with "1". All roads that start between the A2 and A3 begin with "2", etc.

      Roads that cross the arbitrary boundaries retain their number - the roads are numbered depending on where the roads start, and that has to do with the size of the towns involved.

      Luckily, the numbers don't change that much. Hardly ever infact. There was the A34/A43 renumbering that happened about 10 years ago though.

      I moved to Ontario last year, and I really miss the logical road signs of the UK. They were consistent, and easy to spot.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    27. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by m50d · · Score: 1

      The A14, which is near me, used to be the A45 and was changed fairly recently along with being lengthened to meet the M1, so I don't think it's entirely like that. The other end was past the A5 and I'm pretty sure the A6 too. Most of the roads around here start with 1, but I don't think it's all of them, even when they're entirely between the A1 and 2.

      --
      I am trolling
    28. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      One end of the A14 is in Felixstowe - definitely between the A1 and A2.

      Have a look at this site which may help.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    29. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by m50d · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know, I live near it. But how come it used to be the A45?

      --
      I am trolling
    30. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone knows the answer to that one!

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    31. Re:OK, I'm impressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey I've eaten there! but I thought it was called the Happy Plaice (sic)

  5. Great... by Teja · · Score: 1

    Though I wonder if they are planning on adding a sattelite feature any time soon?

    --
    - Teja
    1. Re:Great... by frankthechicken · · Score: 1

      I should imagine there will be the same problem, as with Worldwind, in that it is up to the government or the license holders to release the sat images.

    2. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It exists already, just isn't integrated with .uk TLD. Go to regular Google Maps, scroll right to UK, and choose Satelite. HTH,

    3. Re:Great... by oozer · · Score: 1

      While you're waiting you could try using multimap.com which has been able to blend maps and aerial photography for years. Of course it doesn't have the nice smooth scrolling that google maps does so...

    4. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No image data though unless you scroll far enough out that you can see the east and west coasts of the UK at the same time

    5. Re:Great... by DJCF · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the resolution sucks. I hope GM bring satelite imagery soon...

    6. Re:Great... by VdG · · Score: 2, Informative

      Google Maps UK does look nice and I expect I'll make some use of it. However, one of the things I like about Multimap is that you can actually see the Ordnance Survey map, which gives you loads of lovely detail, including topographic information. This is very nice if you're just looking for a scenic ride.

    7. Re:Great... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Though I wonder if they are planning on adding a sattelite feature any time soon?"

      Hmm... that'll be difficult in Lower Uncton. Might need infa-red.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:Great... by lotsToLearn · · Score: 1

      I can see the satellite images but they are only for bottom 4/5 notches of the zoom level... if u go further close, no images.... rite?

  6. India on Google Maps. by DarkHelmet · · Score: 2, Funny
    Type in: "My Job"

    And it goes to New Delhi...

    Wow, those google people are so smart.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:India on Google Maps. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some one could rig google to return a redirection page.

      "Sorry, Google(tm) could not find your job please try...."

      Sort of like the "French military victories" joke page.

    2. Re:India on Google Maps. by frostman · · Score: 1, Funny

      Speak for yourself. I'm an expert. My job goes to Bangalore.

      --

      This Like That - fun with words!

  7. no staelite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it appears they don't have staelite images for the UK. Oh well :(

  8. Interested to see if they are coming to Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    To the best of my knowledge there are no publically available sources of free mapping or imaging data of Germany. It will be interesting to see what data Google will use if and when they offer the maps service here. There are certainly other free routing/mapping services, but there is no such thing as the free USGS data sets.

  9. Great news by space_dude_27 · · Score: 1

    Glad they extended it to the UK - I was looking forward to this :-) That said, http://www.uk.map24.com/ is still great too.

    1. Re:Great news by terrymaster69 · · Score: 1

      When will they get to Japan though? It's even in the FAQ

      Oh well, the service (esp. the Keyhole stuff) rocks. Keep up the good work guys!

    2. Re:Great news by Yurian · · Score: 1
      Yeah, map24 is great for pure maps. For that, it still has many lovely features that Google is missing, like measureing distances, etc (what's up with Google having no scale on their maps?!)

      But the local search with google maps is just incomparable. Map24 has nothing remotely close. And that just makes Google Maps so much more useful.

  10. Not only the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    But Ireland as well.

    1. Re:Not only the UK by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Cool. I'm going to Ireland this summer. I'll be in Westport, on the Atlantic coast, and last time I was there there was this really great pub... let's see if it can be found.

      tactactac... Pubs in Westport...

      Ah, lots! But all in New York... Is it a bad idea to attempt to swim the Atlantic after a hard night on the Guinness?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Not only the UK by shreevatsa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But IIRC, (part of) Ireland is in the UK. Doesn't UK stand for "The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland"?

    3. Re:Not only the UK by derek_m · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, not really Maps are there for all of Ireland, but the search functionality appears to only cover Northern Ireland - so far at least.

    4. Re:Not only the UK by Yurian · · Score: 1
      Yes, just like the US is a British colony.

      Oh, wait, am I a bit out of touch with the last 300 years of history?

      I hope to God the parent is a troll.

    5. Re:Not only the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The I.R.A. will not decommission so much as a peashooter, until the green, white and gold flies over the Six Counties.

    6. Re:Not only the UK by meringuoid · · Score: 1

      The search function works in Ireland, as long as you're only passing through. You can plot a route from a mainland city to Belfast, no problem, and if appropriate you'll get a boat to Dublin and a neatly planned route through the Republic... but if your destination happens to be Dublin, you're out of luck.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    7. Re:Not only the UK by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      northern ireland is a separate country from ireland (EIRE).

      northern ireland is part of "The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland", not Ireland (Ireland uses the Euro instead of sterling, and they are completely separate now).

    8. Re:Not only the UK by biglig2 · · Score: 0

      Well, you can't troll by being factually correct. Or can you? On slashdot, much is possible.

      Anyhow, the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland" does, as the name suggests, include the top left bit of the island of Ireland.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    9. Re:Not only the UK by tobybuk · · Score: 0

      OT:

      I go to Westport every summer to fish the River Eriff for Salmon. Lovely area, great people. Do you fish over there?

    10. Re:Not only the UK by Yurian · · Score: 1

      I apologise. I misread the parent as "Ireland is (part of) the UK."
      Grammatical dyslexia or something. He is absolutely right. Sorry.

    11. Re:Not only the UK by Finuvir · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ireland is the name of the island, which includes Northern Ireland (part of the UK) and the Republic of Ireland (a seperate nation). The Republic of Ireland is officially called Ireland (in English) or Eire (in Irish). The name "Republic of Ireland" is its official description for use in contexts where the distinction between the nation and the island (both named Ireland) is necessary to avoid ambiguity.

      So yes, part of Ireland (the island) is in the UK. None of Ireland (the country) is in the UK.

      --
      Why is anything anything?
    12. Re:Not only the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you ever have to plan a journey around Dublin try here.

    13. Re:Not only the UK by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      We're all part of the european superstate these days, anyhow. ;-(

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    14. Re:Not only the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      top left?? ...

    15. Re:Not only the UK by ronnieroller · · Score: 1

      The United Kingdom is a country that consists of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. In fact, the official name of the country is "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland." Great Britain is the name of the island northwest of France and east of Ireland that consists of three somewhat autonomous regions: England, Wales and Scotland. Therefore, England is part of Great Britain, which is part of the United Kingdom. The U.K. includes England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland are not countries but the United Kingdom is. The remaining portion of the island of Ireland (that which is not the U.K.'s Northern Ireland) is an independent country called the Republic of Ireland (Eire).

    16. Re:Not only the UK by seanieb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your so wrong, "England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland are not countries but the United Kingdom is."

      England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland are countries but the United Kingdom is a Kingdom. Look at the Rugby, soccer .... Any sports? They even have their own type of money bills.

      I really find it offensive that we (the Irish) can only get to our google maps via .co.uk and maps.google.ie does not work. We've worked and fought for our independence. Now give us a separate google maps. If this isn't possible please remove the Republic of Ireland from "UK MAPS" as we are not part of the UK and will never be.

    17. Re:Not only the UK by ronnieroller · · Score: 1

      Well, i just pasted that info from here... http://geography.about.com/library/faq/blqzuk.htm/ "What is the difference between the United Kingdom, Great Britain, and England?"

    18. Re:Not only the UK by Scurra+UK · · Score: 1

      Your (sic) the one that's wrong. England, Scotland, & Wales are nations that make up the UK (a country).

      Saying that the Irish will never be a part of the UK is a bit presumptious as well, isn't it? History has a habit of repeating itself....

    19. Re:Not only the UK by Asterisk · · Score: 1

      "Country" and "sovereign state" are not synonomous. England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland are clearly distinct countries, despite none having complete political sovereignty. The term can be used to describe any culturally distinct population inhabiting a defined geographical space.

      Even if you do explicitly define "country" by status of political sovereignty, where specifically do you make the distinction between a population that is a country and one that is not? For example, in the very case being discussed, England and Scotland were historically autonomous of one another in all respects until 1603, when they first had a common monarch. But their parliaments didn't merge until 1707 (and now seem to be on the path to un-merging), and their judicial systems have always been completely separate and independent. At what point did England and Scotland respectively stop being "countries" and the entirely politically-defined "United Kingdom" start being one?

    20. Re:Not only the UK by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Actually, part of Ireland (the island) and of Ireland (the country) are in the UK. None of Ireland (the republic) is in the UK.

      Ireland is still one country, even though divided between two regimes, just as Germany was one country even when it came in East and West flavours...

      Irish reunification would be... well, really nice. Unfortunately, every fuckwit with a rifle and bag of Semtex only manages to move that day further and further away.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    21. Re:Not only the UK by Scurra+UK · · Score: 1

      You are wrong. "Nation" decribes a culturally distinct population, "country" just refers to the geographical area.

    22. Re:Not only the UK by Elanor · · Score: 1

      Yeah? I can't find Dublin!!! Just Belfast & rest of NI. There's a Dublin Street in Liverpool and a few others.... :(

    23. Re:Not only the UK by robin_j · · Score: 1
      The I.R.A. will not decommission so much as a peashooter, until the green, white and gold flies over the Six Counties.

      You should check your facts, they have actually decommissioned arms and this has been verified by the internation commitee. Yes, there is a problem at the moment but hopefully.....

    24. Re:Not only the UK by Asterisk · · Score: 1

      Well, "country" can be used to refer to either the land or the people inhabiting it. "Nation" is derived from the Latin nasci, so can certainly only refer to the people. "Country" comes from contrata meaning "opposite", and although this usage usually refers to land, IIRC, a certain Anglo-Saxon word also related to birth has a similar etymology. :)

    25. Re:Not only the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1707.

    26. Re:Not only the UK by Scurra+UK · · Score: 1

      Related to birth? Assuming that was a subtle way of insulting me, I think you'll find the etymology is actually from the old norse "kunta"...

      (As an aside, I think this is the first time I've had to look stuff up in the OED to have an argument on /.) ;)

    27. Re:Not only the UK by Finuvir · · Score: 1

      There is no recognised sovereign nation on Earth that views the island of Ireland as a single country. The constitution of the Republic doesn't even claim the north anymore, and neither does a majority of its population. Similarly a majority population in Northern Ireland doesn't want reunification.

      Whatever your personal feelings and opinions it's quite stretch to talk of the island of Ireland as a single country.

      --
      Why is anything anything?
    28. Re:Not only the UK by radish · · Score: 1

      In the same way that North and South Korea are really one country? Please. Just because two seperate countries share a landmass which used to be a single country doesn't mean they're still a single country. Germany _wasn't_ a single country before reunification (that's why it was called reUNIfication). Or do you consider the Czech Republic to still be the same country as Slovakia? For that matter - is Texas still part of Mexico? Was Hong Kong always part of China?

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    29. Re:Not only the UK by radish · · Score: 1

      England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland are countries but the United Kingdom is a Kingdom. Look at the Rugby, soccer .... Any sports? They even have their own type of money bills.


      Sports teams have nothing to do with it. The respective banks may print different designs on the notes, but the currency is the same. The Queen is head of state of all of them, and there is one government and one Prime Minister (ignoring the puppets in the Scottich Assembly). Everyone carries the same passport, pays tax to the same place and shares a single military. There is a single ISO country code (UK), and a single seat in the UN assembly & security council, and NATO. The UK is a (THE) soverign nation.

      I really find it offensive that we (the Irish) can only get to our google maps via .co.uk and maps.google.ie does not work

      If you find that offensive, steer clear of goatse.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    30. Re:Not only the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Everyone carries the same passport" ... now that's what I call heavy-duty sharing.
      However on a similar topic may I take this opportunity to remind all and sundry that there is NO SUCH THING as an 'English passport' even though I have seen and heard many references to that mythical beast.

  11. Canada by mincognito · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "expand its regional services to an international audience" Canada isn't the U.S. you know.

    1. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With a evil Grin on his face President Bush responds to mincognito "it isn't YET Mewahahahahahahahahahahahah "

    2. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Canada (Score:2, Funny)
      "expand its regional services to an international audience" Canada isn't the U.S. you know.


      Yeah, laughter is the usual reaction when you point that out to Americans.

      The same education is behind New Mexico needing to add USA to their license plates.

      There are a lot of intelligent Americans, but just not the percentage there should be.

    3. Re:Canada by Jussi+K.+Kojootti · · Score: 3, Funny

      Have they sold Canada? To whom?

    4. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada isn't really "international" either.

    5. Re:Canada by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      Care to check that with the dictionary? I believe it disagrees.

      Maybe you'd like to use the word intercontinental in some way shape or form.

      --
      No Comment.
    6. Re:Canada by Mike+Rubits · · Score: 1

      It's not technically correct, however I highly doubt this is going to cause an epidemic of people assuming that means Canada is the US.

      see: nitpicking.

    7. Re:Canada by SEE · · Score: 1

      I've driven to Windsor, in the so-called "country" of Canada.

      Everybody spoke English. Prices were quoted in dollars. All my U.S. radio stations came in just fine. The Detroit News was available in paperboxes. Everybody drove on the right side of the road. The bar had Miller, Bud, Coors, Molson, and Labbat's, just like the one less than a mile from my house. They even had a Tim Horton's just like the one in Troy, Michigan, where I'd gotten a frozen-and-reheated doughnut and a coffee that morning.

      You can pretend all you like, but I think it's pretty clear Canada is just a scam of some kind.

  12. SMS by Big+Mark · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:SMS by MjDelves · · Score: 0

      Sorry but a little OT. Does anyone know how much it would cost to use GoogleSMS in the UK?? Would it be more than the cost of a regular text message??

    2. Re:SMS by Big+Mark · · Score: 1

      Read the FAQ!

      How much does it cost?

      Google is not charging users to send a query or receive results at this time. However, your mobile operator's standard rates for sending and receiving text messages still apply.

    3. Re:SMS by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bugger me. Well, that's the end of the great British pub quiz, then... I think we have to just accept it now. Google is on course to evolve into an Overmind and rule the world. Suddenly I've got an information source in my pocket that makes the Hitch Hiker's Guide To The Galaxy look feeble...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    4. Re:SMS by slyguy135 · · Score: 1

      And best of all it's free! If sending text messages is free for you, of course.

    5. Re:SMS by lowmagnet · · Score: 1

      Isn't there already a 'mobiles off' rule?

      --
      Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
    6. Re:SMS by Scurra+UK · · Score: 1

      Doesn't bloody work though. tried texting it this morning (from O2), never got a reply.

      Anyone had any luck with it?

    7. Re: SMS by gidds · · Score: 1

      Nah, that happened the other week, when I put Wikipedia on my Psion...

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    8. Re:SMS by amembleton · · Score: 1

      Yes, I also texted from o2, this morning at about 11.30. I didn't get a reply till after 3PM!

      This is in beta, but it is certainly not useful until it is somewhat quicker. In the past I have used pricerunners' text based price comparison service and it has been instant. Very useful.

    9. Re:SMS by armb · · Score: 1

      Yes, and if you are going to cheat, you could already use Google anyway, just text a friend.
      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/graphics/2005/04/ 15/calex15.gif

      --
      rant
  13. Pah! by veeoh · · Score: 4, Funny

    No "houses of ill repute", or "ladies of negotiable affection" near me - useless damn site!

    1. Re:Pah! by duncangough · · Score: 1

      Next up, Google Maps Australia:
      "I can see the pub from here!"

      Playaholics: Lightning Pool

    2. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First hint: Look up Massage parlours

      Second hint: Look up clap clinic when you are done won't get you any results either.

    3. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want UK PunterNet.

      (Checks he's ticked "Post Anonymously")

    4. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like the biggest congregation of perverts on the web.... Too bad that prostitution is legal* in the UK or the fuzz** could put that database to good use.

      * Prostitution is legal, but soliciting (standing on street corners, putting adverts in phone boxes), curb crawling and "living off immoral earnings" i.e pimping are illegal. Also brothels (where there is more than one girl in a single premises) are illegal.

      ** police.

    5. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's like the biggest congregation of perverts on the web....
      Wow. That's a *mighty* big claim for any website...
    6. Re:Pah! by fuyu-no-neko · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile...
      Google suggests that for porn in my area, my first priority should be the local college. I guess those cute college girls have to pay for their education somehow ;o)

      http://local.google.co.uk/local?hl=en&lr=&q=porn&n ear=taunton&btnG=Search&sc=1

      --
      Don't take the above poster too seriously. He doesn't.
    7. Re:Pah! by Jussi+K.+Kojootti · · Score: 1

      There seems to be a red light district between Manchester and Birmingham though -- search "brothel" ;)

    8. Re:Pah! by rsturbonutter · · Score: 1

      Try this site instead

    9. Re:Pah! by henrygb · · Score: 1

      Which somehow seems to include the National Trust at Little Moreton Hall.

    10. Re:Pah! by gowen · · Score: 2, Funny

      More worrying is that Somerset County Cricket Club is further down that list...

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    11. Re:Pah! by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      One of the most frequent referrer hits on my domain name is "milton keynes prostitutes" or "red light district milton keynes" and I live nowhere near there (obviously I've mentioned it on my journal somewhere in the past.

      I get these hits, or variations on them, multiple times every month.

      I think someone in the Milton Keynes area really needs to learn how to masturbate.

    12. Re:Pah! by lupinp · · Score: 1

      Move to Bath: a local search for "brothel" in BA2 offers:

      Future Publishing Ltd
      01225 442244 -1.8 mi N

      Theatre Royal Bath The,Ltd
      01225 448844 -1.8 mi NE

      The English Group
      01225 443555 -1.7 mi NE

      The Tobacco Factory Theatre Box Office
      0117 902 0344 -12 mi NW

      IFA Promotion Hotline
      0800 0853250 -8.5 mi NW

      The Beehive
      01225 863620 -6.3 mi E

      Well House Consultants
      01225 708225 -11 mi E

      Throb Holidays Ltd
      01373 453550 -8.6 mi S

      Distinctly Different
      01225 866648 -5.6 mi E

      Stanfords
      0117 929 9966 -11 mi NW

      Whilst Future Publishing does have a hint of possible blackmail, you can't ignore Throb Holidays.

    13. Re:Pah! by arwel · · Score: 1

      You mean Stoke?

  14. If you scroll over.... by Momoru · · Score: 0

    If you scroll all the way to the left, you see the US maps, if you scroll to the right you see just water...kind of reverse Christopher Columbus. Doesn't seem to want to make a map from London to Washington, DC though.

    1. Re:If you scroll over.... by zocle · · Score: 1
      How long before asking for directions between locations in different countries, such as your house in the UK and a hotel in the US, and google gives you details of flights between the nearest appropriate airports?

      That would be the kind of leap ahead of the competition we can expect from the mighty G.

    2. Re:If you scroll over.... by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Informative
      How long before asking for directions between locations in different countries, such as your house in the UK and a hotel in the US, and google gives you details of flights between the nearest appropriate airports?

      I played with this a bit. Plan a route from, say, Bristol to Belfast, and Google will include the ferry from Holyhead to Dublin. So, my guess: not very long at all.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    3. Re:If you scroll over.... by Deaths+Hand · · Score: 0

      So the UK is in fact the 51st State!

    4. Re:If you scroll over.... by wowbagger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ehhh, not quite.

      All the mapping programs I've worked with treat ferry routes "like a road" - they have the ferry route in the database just as they would a road, and they just have a flag that says "This is a ferry route".

      I have yet to see a routing program that knew of the schedule of the ferry and would then say "At this point, wait 6.3 hours for the ferry to arrive".

      The problem with extending this to the airlines would be the time dependence of the different routes. While it does not matter WHEN I arrive at the junction of I-35 and I-40 (I-40 will still be there and still be available), if my plane arrives 1 hour too late, the next plane will be gone, and the route will be invalidated.

      And then there is the fact that the "cost" of taking a given road is pretty easily computed - take the length of the road, multiply by an estimated speed for that type of road - done. Now, try to compute the "cost" of a flight - is that super-duper-mega-saver-standby, or "I need to fly out TONIGHT" pay through the nose?

      Having a routing program that takes into account the different costs of air travel - especially when you remove the constraints on city of departure and arrival - you'd get into a VERY nasty bit of design. Consider: is it faster/cheaper to drive to Wichita, get a plane to Dallas, get a plane to LA, drive to Acton, or is it cheaper to fly into Burbank, or into Flagstaff, or to drive to OKC and fly out, or to KCI, or to Salina, or.... - and each of those choices imposes time constraints on the connections.

      I won't speculate on the P/NP completeness of the problem, and I won't say that it COULDN'T be solved electronically, but I think you'd still be better planning the air part of the trips with a dedicated tool and much input from the user, then planning the road trip side of things with a map program.

    5. Re:If you scroll over.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the best thing for Google Maps to do would be to limit the scope. Concentrate on directing people to the nearest airport that has regular flights to the overseas city they're trying to get to. Still not too useful for most people as they're probably going to want to shop around for cheaper fares involving more distant airports, layovers, etc. but it would at least provide the (technically) most *direct* route.

    6. Re:If you scroll over.... by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      How long before you can type in "My Life", and google will tell your fortune?

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    7. Re:If you scroll over.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds to me like it would be about as difficult as measuring the relevancy of every page on the internet for a given keyword based on the relevancy of the pages that link to it.

  15. Nice but not up to date by trash+eighty · · Score: 4, Informative

    very nice though several newish roads (2-3 years old by now) near me arn't on the maps.

    1. Re:Nice but not up to date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there is a lack of detail on public highways that are not in built-up areas. This would be great illustrating the South Downs Way, but it just doesn't (yet?).

    2. Re:Nice but not up to date by hoofie · · Score: 1
      Google apparently uses Tele Atlas. Thats the same provider as my in car GPS.

      Some people in the UK have complained that its not up-to-date enough, although the version I have does have the M6 toll road on it.

    3. Re:Nice but not up to date by nmg196 · · Score: 1

      How do you know they're using TeleAtlas as opposed to Navteq? At the bottom of the page it has both names. How you can use two different sets of data on one map I don't know...

    4. Re:Nice but not up to date by theorbtwo · · Score: 1

      I think they actually get the data from the UK government directly: Map data ©Crown copyright. Licence number 100026920

    5. Re:Nice but not up to date by zebs · · Score: 1

      Its a huge improvement over AutoRoute, as it includes M6 Toll and the local (to me) Great Glen bypass.

    6. Re:Nice but not up to date by nmg196 · · Score: 1

      Where did you see that?

      Overlaid on all the maps at the bottom right, it clearly says:
      Map data (c)2005 Navteq(TM), TeleAtlas

      I've not seen "Crown copyright" anywhere. It's not even in the source of the page.

      Are you looking at the same site as the rest of us?

      http://maps.google.co.uk/

    7. Re:Nice but not up to date by theorbtwo · · Score: 1

      It's off to the right, underneath the search results (meaning that you have to search to see it).

    8. Re:Nice but not up to date by noims · · Score: 1

      I just checked my parents' place in Dublin and the road names are completely wrong. OK, so they might be old names, but if that's the case they're over 30 years old.

      Also, the relatively new light rail system in Dublin is completely missing, which could confuse users. This could be interesting in dating satellite images if they're next since it took a fair while to build.

      Noims

      --
      This is not the greatest sig in the world. This is just a tribute.
    9. Re:Nice but not up to date by aslate · · Score: 1

      It's also got some strange problems:
      Elmstead Woods Station

      Nowhere near the railway line and infact the totally wrong road, it's not even on Station Approach (Zoom to read name). Now when i try searching for "Elmstead" it gives one result elsewhere, "Elmstead Woods" doesn't exist.

      Okay, the map data may be "Map data ©Crown copyright. Licence number 100026920". However the search should still work.

    10. Re:Nice but not up to date by goober1473 · · Score: 1

      It couild be worse. Try living on the Isle of Man where apparently there are no towns and so no need for roads. Maybe it has become a nuclear test site or something.

  16. Re:But the prime minister's house by philbowman · · Score: 1

    Oh crap - BEWARE FAKE LINK IN PARENT. "Downing street london" works.

    --
    Phil
  17. Google Ireland by cormster · · Score: 1

    Actually, i'm sure it was more to do with Google Ireland, since their European headquarters is here, and Irish maps appeared just before the UK ones.

  18. Just type "downing street" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are 10 to choose from so I assume it cant find 10 "number 10s" at once.

    PS:

    Im still trying to find "W@nkers corner, Portland" in the USA, have they wiped it from Google?, I found it in the Encarta world atlas.

  19. Inaccurate? by rbbs · · Score: 1

    Not sure where they get their data from...
    my postcode is wrong as is my nearest tube...

    http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=angel,+n1&hl=en

    although it does have the link in the right place...just not the picture...v odd

  20. Cuba by opk · · Score: 1

    But somehow Cuba makes it on to the map. Except they think it's empty.

  21. Route Finder by ReVMD · · Score: 1

    If I took some of the routes its suggesting for me to get about the outskirts of london I'd be arrested for going the wrong way down one way streets.

    Still impressive considering local companies such as the RAC can't even give such clear directions.

    1. Re:Route Finder by steve_l · · Score: 1

      It's a lot better than Autoroute on the laptop was, that one suggested to me that I turn left off the clifton suspension bridge to get to the road 70m below.

      It also knows a lot about blocked off roads, enough to suggest an almost viable route between two roads. I say almost, as it did add one illegal U-turn:-

      http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?spn=0.009552,0.01578 0&saddr=nugent+hill,+bristol&daddr=Dove+Street,+Ci ty+of+Bristol,+Bristol,+BS2&hl=en

    2. Re:Route Finder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The directions are clear until you come to a roundabout (see steps 2 and 4).

      "Turn left" is an interesting way to say "turn right". Could make navigating through Milton Keynes a little tricky.

  22. And on US Google maps by Static_Neurotoxin · · Score: 1

    If you zoom out and scroll far to your right, you see the UK.

    http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=51.468750,-0.099501 &spn=6.487427,8.975830&t=k&hl=en
    http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=51.468750,-0.099501 &spn=4.613281,8.271914&hl=en

    Now if they could only get Canadian Highways to stop showing up as US interstates...

    --
    --- If stupidity got us into this mess, why can it get us out?
    1. Re:And on US Google maps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also search a UK postcode in the .com version, and it takes you to the UK.
      SW7 2BZ.

      And UK searches too, e.g. My university.

      The preference between US/UK is strange though -- if I search Boston, I get Boston Mass., with "Boston UK" I get the one in the UK. "cambridge" gives me the UK, "cambridge USA" the USA.

      Top marks for making it work with Opera, too :-)

  23. Re:But the prime minister's house by pklong · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's not like you can go visit anyway. They errected huge steel gates at the end of Downing street years ago. All you can do if peer through the railings.

    --

    Philip

    Signatures are broken

  24. Australia next please ! by Foddrick · · Score: 1

    Compared to any offerings we have for this country, (Yes, I'm talking to you Whereis) Google Maps is sorely needed. Can anyone recommend an Aussie site that's better than whereis ?

    1. Re:Australia next please ! by imroy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bah, with our small population in relation to our large size we'll probably be the last continent to be covered by Google maps/local. I'd expect western Europe and/or southeast Asia to be covered next. Lots more people there. Even parts of Africa and South America might be covered before us.

    2. Re:Australia next please ! by strider44 · · Score: 1, Funny

      No it'd be easy - just make the middle 70% red.

  25. Hmm, good and bad things by iainl · · Score: 5, Funny

    On the one hand, it knows about the mighty Hings, the Food of the Gods. On the other, I'm more than a little disturbed by the Google ad that 'helpfully' suggests I could find cheaper Fish & Chips on eBay. Doesn't really bear thinking about, that one.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  26. Mobile Google Local is also coming by shuopio · · Score: 1

    The Mobile Google Local UK seems to be coming along too. At present the searches result a broken page, but the actual search results seem to be there.

    The US version seems to work fine.

  27. Unusual Projections by andrewbirkett · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the UK, most maps use the British Grid projection. Google, in their international wisdom, appear to have used a different projection which causes the map to "appear wrong" to a UK person. Actually, the map is perfectly correct, it's just that Google are presenting it in a way which is not customary for the UK.

    For example, try a search for postcode "EH1" on http://maps.google.co.uk, and the same on www.multimap.co.uk. Notice that the shape of the quarter-circle road system (Princes St, Melville Drive, the Bridges) is different on each.

    1. Re:Unusual Projections by badfish99 · · Score: 1

      It looks to me like what has gone wrong with "EH1" is that the multimap version is a genuine map (it looks to me like a regular Ordnance Survey map) whereas the google version is just an air photograph coloured in: it looks wrong because it is wrong, because it's been taken from an angle. I suppose they couldn't afford to pay for proper map data, so they just paid some people in India to trace over the roads on some photos they took from a plane or satellite.

    2. Re:Unusual Projections by Jussi+K.+Kojootti · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well, maybe that international wisdom is worth something?

      I mean, they will eventually cover continental Europe too. Then would you like to have different services for the UK and rest of Europe? Or maybe you're thinking rest of Europe should use the British Grid too ;)

    3. Re:Unusual Projections by mikey_boy · · Score: 1

      I have to say I think that their maps are a damnsight easier to read by not being ordnance survey maps ... the way they colour everything is very clean, and makes things a lot clearer.

      just my tuppence worth ;-)

    4. Re:Unusual Projections by jabuzz · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, but most european countries have suitable projections optimized for the country. So Great Britain should use OSGB36 and Ireland should use the Irish National Grid, and so on and so forth. Instead they look to have imposed some WGS84 based projection on us.

    5. Re:Unusual Projections by pklong · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I *love* Ordnance Survey map. They certainly are not idea street maps (the scale is wrong for a start - zoom in on Multimap for a street map).

      They just are so fantastically detailed. Look at this map of Mount Snowdon. You can almost visualise the mountains. It's quite amazing to be able to figure out which rock outcrop your arse is currently sitting on. It's certainly very usefull to have the gradient lines....

      --

      Philip

      Signatures are broken

    6. Re:Unusual Projections by Jussi+K.+Kojootti · · Score: 1, Interesting

      And when the user zooms out to see the whole of Europe?

    7. Re:Unusual Projections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't wish to insult you, but cartography is quite possibly the most boring profesion in the entire universe.

    8. Re:Unusual Projections by mikey_boy · · Score: 1

      heh, I think my roots of being a city boy have been exposed - you are right of course that ordnance survey are much more useful when you aren't talking about urban areas! ;-)

    9. Re:Unusual Projections by allym · · Score: 1

      For example, try a search for postcode "EH1" on http://maps.google.co.uk, and the same on www.multimap.co.uk. Notice that the shape of the quarter-circle road system (Princes St, Melville Drive, the Bridges) is different on each.

      I would try this out but apparently my browser isn't supported by Google Maps. (Konq 3.3.2)

    10. Re:Unusual Projections by redbaron7 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It is worse than that. It looks like their postcode database was in OS GR coordinates (good), which they converted to lat,long; but used the new coords as if they are WGS84 and not Airy36. This results in errors of a few hundred metres. I've mailed them point out the error.

    11. Re:Unusual Projections by Combuchan · · Score: 1

      Consider all that you can present on a map. Roads, rivers, floodplains, counties, states, poltical affiliations, population density, any demographic aspect you can think of.

      Then consider all that you can present without cluttering it up. Your map has to look clean.

      Now represent this information accurately without distortion and bias. The map should like the world we know and remain objective, even to somebody who holds a different opinion from you or is from a different country.

      Now present it in multiple forms--on paper, online, on the back of a matchbook. Try doing it without the use of color, or use large print to accomodate the disabled.

      If you can accomplish all of the aforementioned, I think you'll find cartography as one of the most underrated and challenging of the sciences.

      --
      "[T]he single essential element on which all discoveries will be dependent is human freedom." -- Barry Goldwater
    12. Re:Unusual Projections by duggy_92127 · · Score: 1

      You seem to know what you're talking about, maybe you can help me. I'm an American, and I know somebody who's in the UK right now. I supposedly know the address where she's staying, but try as I might, I cannot get Google Maps UK to show it. Here is the address, verbatim as I received it:

      54, Meakin Avenue, Westbury Park
      Newcastle.
      Staffs
      ST5 4EY

      I can actually find the street, because I know where it is from other mapping programs, but I can't get Google to find it for me. I assume I'm just unfamiliar with how UK addresses should be formatted in the search bar. Can you help? Thanks.

      Doug

    13. Re:Unusual Projections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something strange going on there with Google Maps - the postcode alone finds it, but it can't find the street. Try http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=ST5+4EY&hl=en

    14. Re:Unusual Projections by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Giving out the full address of one's female friend on Slashdot just can't be the best idea...

  28. Google Maps India a distant dream by cOdEgUru · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not due to the lack of attempt, just that mostly directions meant (when I was growing up) was : "Go Straight for two kilometres, turn right at the Junction with the Statue and then one mile ahead take a left by the Cricket Stadium". Not something you want to pull up on Google!

    In the Rural areas of the country and even in the suburbs of some major metropolitan areas, the above method will apply.

    Rarely are there Street names. But it doesnt really matter as men arent embarassed to ask for directions :)

    1. Re:Google Maps India a distant dream by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      It could be worse :-)

    2. Re:Google Maps India a distant dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it doesnt really matter as men arent embarassed to ask for directions

      Don't know about you, but I never ask for directions. Zen Driving's the way to go:
      Find a car that looks like it knows where its going and follow that.

      It almost never gets you where you want to go, but it'll get you where you need to go.

    3. Re:Google Maps India a distant dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The main problem with starting a service like this in India would be keeping it up to date. Have you seen the latest Eicher and TTK maps? Most of them are, at least, 3 years outdated. Even those of the cities.

      75% of the country is rural, so the high level of detail is quite impossible. Most cities are under construction all the time, so details keep changing. Been to hyderabad lately? Those guys are going crazy with flyovers. It's not just minor roads either. National Highways (B'lore-Hyd, NH4 I think) are still being constructed. Main roads in the cities keep getting rerouted.

      Besides, there would be no demand for it for maybe 3-4 years more. Internet penetration isn't really that high :(

      And this is just from my knowledge as a college guy who doesn't travel much. Regular travellers I know tell me that roads keep changing all the time. I don't see this happening very soon.

    4. Re:Google Maps India a distant dream by swiftstream · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It is like this in other places, as well--or even worse! I lived in Nicaragua for three years, and in the capital they gave directions by referring to places that had been destroyed thirty years earlier, in the earthquake of '72!

      "What? The American school? Oh, right, it's right behind [such and such building]"

      "Where's that?"

      "Uh, well, it got destroyed in the earthquake, but if you drive three blocks east toward the lake, then turn south..."

      --
      Be a PATRIOT--because the only thing we have to fear is the lack thereof.
    5. Re:Google Maps India a distant dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I pretty much use the Eicher map to get anywhere in Bangalore. The level of detail is about as good as Google maps at full zoom, maybe a little better.

      Online driving directions may not work, but an online map of that detail of major indian cities would be incredibly popular

    6. Re:Google Maps India a distant dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. However advanced technology/algorythm Google developes, it can not handle the 'human' part of giving directions in India.

      e.g. locating xyz involves something like this:
      Q: How do I go there.
      A: Go to place A(you have to know where it is, in first place), then make a left (the second one, out of 5 roads merging there). once you cross temple within 2-4 kilometers, you will see around 100 cows sitting lazily on the road. Take a right there and locate a red brick building some 5 kilometers down. Take a U - turn (but make sure you can take a u-turn there). When you see a local pub named , take left right there and the 5th or 6th building on left is XYZ!!

    7. Re:Google Maps India a distant dream by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      Yes, which is why satellite maps, as opposed to those hand-drawn ones at MapsOfIndia are the way to go.

    8. Re:Google Maps India a distant dream by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      Actually, most, if not all, roads have at least one official name, just as every house and shed has its own unique ward number. It's just that no one bothers using it; much easier to use Zam Zam Cafe as a landmark rather than calling the dirt path to your home as Major Mohammed Abdul Karim Marg or something.

      But again, all this just points to a clear need for accurate satellite maps for the general public, something that Google Maps has been doing for the US.

  29. Stripped-down mapping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Speaking as a geographer/cartographer, I've found Google Maps exceedingly useful. But a few things to note, applying both to the UK and the US sites.

    --Data resolution is far from uniform. We see every little street in central London, but go to northern Scotland and only (relatively) major roads show up.

    --The engine is less than wonderful when it comes to choosing the most important towns to identify on the maps at various scales. The base view identifies the Edinburgh neighborhood of Dunfermline, rather than the greater (and more recognizable) conurbation. Similarly, I've found it awkward when looking around the US midwest--sometimes it seemed to display every place name *but* Peoria.

    --In the US version at least, highway numbers seem to be displayed fully only at very high zooms. There could also be more distinction in road grades--currently the system distinguishes only freeways, state roads, and everything else. This makes it a bit difficult to use the system for figuring out driving routes.

    --Could do better at showing non-road things: rivers, neighborhoods, etc.

    All in all, the search feature and seemless panning are excellent, but the maps generated are a bit too stripped-down for my tastes.

    1. Re:Stripped-down mapping. by thebrix · · Score: 1

      I think these are "anomalies" which will be ironed out in due course.

      For example, if you look for "bracknell railway station" you get a semi-random collection of railway stations around Bracknell, but not Bracknell railway station itself, which appears to be omitted. And, if you zoom into Bracknell, the various neighbourhoods are named but not Bracknell itself ...

      Closer to home, I see that, around here, all the railway and London Underground stations are displayed except the most important one (Clapham Junction) - try "sw4" and zoom out a couple of notches.

      Also, as ever, journey times are optimistic. I would add 30-50 per cent at least for anything starting or finishing in London.

  30. Re:Where's Edinburgh? by willm5 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The label for Dunfermline obscures the label for Edinburgh on the zoomed out view. It is actualy there if you zoom in a bit..

  31. Looks like UK satellite views soon too... by Aphrika · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you go to the maps.google.com, zoom right out and switch to satellite view, you can scroll over to the right where the UK is and hey presto satellite views!

    It's not complete yet and only zooms halfway in before you're notified it's incomplete, but it should definitely be something to look forward to.

    1. Re:Looks like UK satellite views soon too... by De+Lemming · · Score: 2, Informative

      On that zoom level, they have satellite views for the whole world. But if you try to zoom in a bit (zoom level 6 of 15), you get the message "We're sorry, but we don't have imagery at this zoom level for this region. Try zooming out for a broader look."

    2. Re:Looks like UK satellite views soon too... by MikeXpop · · Score: 1

      The satellite view of the world from far away has been available since Google added satellite. Nothing new here, I'm afraid.

      --
      Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    3. Re:Looks like UK satellite views soon too... by necronom426 · · Score: 1

      Ohh yeah. You can allllllmost see my house if you squint.

      Maybe in 6 months we'll have the fully zoomed in version. Google are doing a good job I think.

      Paul.
      ________________

      Give Opera a try. Go on. You know you want to.

    4. Re:Looks like UK satellite views soon too... by sas-dot · · Score: 2, Informative

      In fact entire global image is there in the google satellite images. These images are called NASA Blue marble Images. A zoom of up to 6 notches we can see images. India is not far in Googles sight...

  32. Other option..(I think its better) by xtracto · · Score: 2, Informative

    Although I am a google fan, I have been using for quite some time the Map24 page after someone in /. pointed at it. I find it quite useful and the interface is pretty cool (Real time map find using Java or No Java option.

    I find it quite useful to look for places in Europe when going to a conference or vacations, that and the HostelWorld are pretty cool pages, now, there is something I have seen no Map page do, that is, to add Bus line information to the maps, I know in some countrys it would be rather difficult but, in UK, there is Arriva, MerseyTravel and other companies whose lines and journeys are very well defined, now, if someone adds that functionality it will be THE map web page I will use =o).

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    1. Re:Other option..(I think its better) by tengwar · · Score: 1

      It could be done for all public transport in the UK, I believe. All transport authorities are required to maintain timetable information in ATCO CIF format. This is capable of carrying dynamic information (e.g. a late-running bus) as well as static timetables, but I'm not sure how widely this is implemented.

    2. Re:Other option..(I think its better) by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Cool, would you mind to explain in detail this ATCO CIF format? (or better, a link) is this information available online?? (free?)

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    3. Re:Other option..(I think its better) by razmaspaz · · Score: 1

      You should check out this cool website, google.com where you can 'search' for links to almost anything. ;-)

      --
      I tried for 5 years to come up with a clever sig...only to realize that I am not clever.
    4. Re:Other option..(I think its better) by fatcow · · Score: 0

      There is a government webpage called transportdirect which I found quite useful. It can take you from A to B in all manners of ways -- be it driving, bussing, trains or ferries.

  33. Re:Where's Edinburgh? by markxz · · Score: 1

    They must be using old data, Dunfermline was the Scottish capital (until 1603)

  34. No junction numbers. by shippo · · Score: 1

    If you find a route between two locations that includes motorway travel, there's no indication of the junction number when leaving a motorway.

    1. Re:No junction numbers. by BenjyD · · Score: 2, Informative

      Still using Americanisms as well: "Take the ramp to Stansted/London" for example. Ramp? What is this, a BMX stunt course?

  35. Poor routing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at something like this route (Leicester to location in London). It takes you ¼-way round the M25, much much longer than continuing to the end of the M1, and slower too! Insane!

    1. Re:Poor routing by cybergibbons · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I presume your at Imperial College... but that's not the point.

      That motorway based route would not only be faster when there is no traffic (which is what most route finders assume), but it is a hell of a lot more simple. Simplicity is really important when your driving a route for the first time in London...

    2. Re:Poor routing by amw · · Score: 1
      ... but it is a hell of a lot more simple
      Not towards the end, it's not. Look at the last few miles, after the motorways have ended. The route turns off the Great West Road, through the suburbs of Chiswick and Shepherd's Bush, then back on to Cromwell Road [a continuation of the GWR].

      I counted at least 12 turns, roundabouts and mini-roundabouts. This is simpler than one roundabout and a 2- or 3-lane road all the way? These route finders are great, I admit, for the longer distances, but local knowledge (or, just looking at a map) can beat them most times.

      Adrian (Imperial College '93-'97, but that's also not the point)
  36. The services need to be imporved by deconvolution · · Score: 1

    I try to find something about northern ireland in both local/map services, but it says

    Unable to understand address northern ireland. Please try another address. Suggestions: - Make sure all words are spelled correctly. - Try using a less ambiguous location like a post code

    1. Re:The services need to be imporved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which part of that message didn't you understand? I guess perhaps all of it, if your spelling is anything to do by.

  37. India? by illuvator · · Score: 2, Informative

    After getting lost in Haryana once, I figured out that most roads here do not have names, and even if they do, no one is quite sure where they go...

    You could probably map the "official" areas of big cities like Delhi or Mumbai, but forget about the slums or village India.

    1. Re:India? by The+Cydonian · · Score: 2, Insightful
      *sigh*. Third time I'm pointing out in this thread, but imagine driving through Harayana with a decent-resolution *satellite* map that you've just downloaded off your 3G mobile phone. You probably wouldnt have gotten lost! :-)

      The point being, I'd disagree with the notion that India is not ready for Google Maps. On the contrary, I think countries like India are a perfect market for a web-based satellite atlas that Google Maps effectively is.

  38. Google Maps India a long time away by thodu · · Score: 1

    Given that the Indian government till date is very selective about who they release map data to, I would guess that any Google Maps for India is a long time away. I know people would say that Google can just buy satellite images from an independent source, however, they would need to do a lot of work on these basic images, since basic GIS data for India is not freely available from a central place. Large patches of road, street addresses, establishments, etc. have not yet been mapped and digitized. I would guess that Google Maps India for main metros to be 1-2 years away, while the same for the whole country to be at least 4-5 years away. I am sure that visiting tourists to India have felt the lack of good local maps a trile annoying....

  39. Got there first by TintinX · · Score: 1

    Yes! Yours Truly steals a march on /.
    I reported on this in my Internet column for the local newspaper on Monday.
    Bugger that it comes out on Thursday, thus making it look (once again) that I simply lift my article from /. posts.
    OK, so it's karma as it's true most of the time.
    Have to hope that most of my readers don't regularly check /. or the BBC's tech section.

    1. Re:Got there first by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      Yes! Yours Truly steals a march on /.

      Because that is something that is really, really hard to do.

      Have to hope that most of my readers don't regularly check /.

      I wouldn't worry. If they do, they will be totally accustomed to seeing dupes anyway.

  40. Ordnance Survey Maps by pklong · · Score: 1

    I'd give my eye'd teeth for that service with Ordnance Survery Maps available as well. Just imagine a free, scrollable zoomable Ordnance Survey map mmmm.

    Of course they are useless as street maps, but ideal for just about everything else (yes I know you can pay for online Ordnance Survey maps)

    --

    Philip

    Signatures are broken

  41. Re:Where's Edinburgh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you'd think they'd put the capital of scotland in there when its zoomed out.
    even when you zoom in a little more dalkeith apears but still no edinburgh!

  42. No Ordnance Survey maps! by jabuzz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Frankly I will be sticking with streetmap.co.uk, multimap.com and the OS's own website that have the highly detailed, instantly recognizable to anyone from the U.K. Ordnance Survey 1:50000 and 1:25000 topographic maps of Great Britain on them. They also have the easily recognisable Bartholomew and OS road atlas maps. In comparison the TeleAtlas road maps suck.

    1. Re:No Ordnance Survey maps! by rjw57 · · Score: 1

      You can't zoom in to see street names on the OS website tho'.

      Google Maps has the advantage of UI over many other sites (which, IMHO, is the main reason Google's offerings do well).

      --
      Rich
    2. Re:No Ordnance Survey maps! by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      Have you tried http://www.map24.co.uk ? It's even more 'realtime' than Google's and the roads are clear. Also you can expand a map to fill the whole screen - something GoogleMap can't do.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
  43. Re:Where's Edinburgh? by magpie · · Score: 1

    I recon it's intentional.... they had a crack team of weegies (glasgow types) working one it.

  44. Map24 and Google by TheIdaho · · Score: 2, Informative

    It seems to me that its no coincidence that Map24 is also a good service - if you check their home page www.uk.map24.com then they are announcing a collaboration with Google. Methinks this is where Google got their map data from, and perhaps some of the software.

    1. Re:Map24 and Google by Hank+Chinaski · · Score: 1

      in fact both of them buy their maps from tele atlas b.v. which is a dutch company. the collaboration info states that google is going to display a map24 link with their search results.

      --
      IAAL
  45. Missing places by AndrewRUK · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's nice, but it's missing quite a lot of places - try searching for the Millennium Stadium (in Cardiff), the National Exhibition Centre (Birmingham), Bristol Temple Meads station, Birmingham New Street station, Edinburgh Waverly station or Cardiff Central station (I tried stations because it gave Paddington as an example and they have unique names, so it should be easy for it to find them if it knows about them.)

    1. Re:Missing places by VincyWay · · Score: 1

      And they are missing the Millennium Bridge in London. As well as a number of changes to roads, streets and highways that were in place over 5 years ago. I wouldn't suggest trying to navigate using these pages.

    2. Re:Missing places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bristol temple meads works for me. Interestingly the first three places listed on the left are pubs..

    3. Re:Missing places by iapetus · · Score: 1

      It may not have Edinburgh Waverly station, but it does have Edinburgh Waverley Station. Is that close enough for you?

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    4. Re:Missing places by iainl · · Score: 1

      Given it's a road map application, I sincerely hope you don't plan on taking a journey across the Millennium Bridge anyway!

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    5. Re:Missing places by AndrewRUK · · Score: 1
      Odd. When I search for temple meads (or when I click your link) it doesn't find the station, it lists:
      The Old Duke
      The Cornubia
      The Crown & Cushion
      Zee Bar & Grill
      Ye Shakespeare
      The Stag & Hounds
      Printers Devil
      Portwall Tavern
      British Empire & Commonwealth Museum
      The Colosseum
      While the Old Duke is a rather fine pub & jazz venue, it's not much use if you're trying to find the station. (The Empire & Commonwealth Museum is next door to Temple Meads, but if you know that, you probably already know how to get to the station...)
    6. Re:Missing places by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1

      Station names aren't unique - there's a London Road in Guildford and another in Brighton. Similarly, there's a Gillingham in Kent and another in Dorset, though they're at least pronounced differently :)

      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
    7. Re:Missing places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you look at the map that's displayed though, it's the correct location for Temple Meads. You're right that it isn't marked, which is even odder because it clearly knows exactly where it is!

    8. Re:Missing places by AndrewRUK · · Score: 1

      Umm, s'pose so. Pedant.
      Dam you peple who can spel. ;-)

    9. Re:Missing places by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      They also mis-placed Ponders End railway station.

      Brimsdown is the next station north, which oddly is now Ponders End.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  46. Re:But the prime minister's house by myc_lykaon · · Score: 1

    ... is actually number 11 - he swapped with Gordon Brown as No. 11 is bigger and Brown didn't have a family at the time.

  47. UK is really close to the US... by StandardsSchmandards · · Score: 1

    It's because the UK is really close to the US: http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?ll=50.625000,-51.533 192&spn=57.250000,119.552956&hl=en Maps don't lie!

  48. australia on the list by any chance? by whatsup_will · · Score: 1

    http://maps.google.com.au or something like that?? i wonder how many satelite images of dirt they will have when they do australia??

    1. Re:australia on the list by any chance? by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      Nasa WorldWind program gives good zooms on australia, i think its a combo of 2m maps and 10m maps. But it looks good, especially with 3d terrain (though offset by 1km tsktsk) , its nice to zoom in and zoom out in full 3d and spin it around just like those movies do.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  49. Its like Bono by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    When he releases a #1 hit hes English, when hes annoying people he's Irish. ;)

    Incidently Irish laws on maps is pretty strict. For example if I was to draw a map on a napkin of somewhere in Ireland the Irish government automatically own it.

    You generally have to get permission before displaying Irish maps, even if you created it yourself. Surprised there is no (c) showing when you look at the Irish parts.

  50. dog's bollocks! by hajmola · · Score: 0

    about bloody time...

    hurrah google!

    now i can finally find me way to a dentist...

  51. UKish by nagora · · Score: 1
    Northern Ireland seems a bit blank outside of Belfast - there's no streets in Bangor, for example, despite it being a town of 60-80000 people (depending on who you believe). Mind you, Multipmap's NI maps are from 1970, so it's debatable which is worse.

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  52. Can't cope with roundabouts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Google Maps UK directions tell you to turn left onto the first turning for 0.0 miles and then to turn left onto the exit you want, at every roundabout. Just going from my home to my work it messed up on five roundabouts. It even happens when just crossing a roundabout. Do they have roundabouts in the States?

    1. Re:Can't cope with roundabouts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There arn't many roundabouts (traffic circles) in the US, no. I hear there are a few in the northern states, around New York, but pretty much unheard of elsewhere. If you've ever driven in the US you'd know why this is a good thing.

    2. Re:Can't cope with roundabouts by VdG · · Score: 1

      Well, I have driven (well: ridden) in the USA and I really missed roundabouts. They're a very efficient way of dealing with junctions without using traffic lights. The big disadvantage is that they take up more space, but that shouldn't be a problem.

      They're not suitable for every situation but in the right place they work very well and they're not difficult to use.

  53. Useless by hey! · · Score: 1

    I still can't find "Ottery St. Catchpole" :-(

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  54. Where is Edinburgh? by Telcontar · · Score: 1

    I found it kind of odd that Edinburgh, the capital of Scotland, is only visible after zooming in quite a lot. Instead it is shadowed by Dunfermline, an unimportant small town shown in huge script. Someone must have badly screwed up the name placement algorithm and/or the map data. What makes this blunder worse is that no one noticed even though it appears on the front page, and zooming in just a little does not even fix it yet.

    1. Re:Where is Edinburgh? by The_Spud · · Score: 1

      Even worse is their glasgow maps which include lots of really bizzare errors.

      example
      For example the west end of the city has Inverquhomery Road instead of Great Western Road. University Avenue is called chewton way ?!?!

      These are not exactly obscure parts of Glasgow. The university has only been there for 500 years you would think they could get Uni Avenue right.

  55. gee, like its so hard, heres how.... by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    1. use $100m and buy UBD aussie maps or
    do a co-licence agreement at $5m/year
    2. write the webservice wrapper to their database
    3. add the nasa / keyhole sat data.
    3b. Pay digitalglobal $250,000 for an uptodate sat maps of aust.

    But adding photo views of city/place locations linked to the maps would be good too from http://www.worldcityphotos.org/

    Germany is alredy online http://www.hot-maps.de/index.html

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  56. try this map place by cheekyboy · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.hot-maps.de/index.html

    and if you want good sat photos, download nasa's WorldWind earth viewer.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    1. Re:try this map place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried the WorldWind viewer, but they only show Landsat images of Germany, and in an inaccurately assembled way, I should say. Are there additional sources that I am not aware of?

  57. Where the Hell is Galway? by IdJit · · Score: 0

    Bloody great city and it's not even on the friggin' map.

    1. Re:Where the Hell is Galway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's there but you can't search for it for some reason...I think they have added the maps of Ireland but have not added the associated data.

      BTW if you zoom in on Galway the maps are quite detailed at higher resolution, my street name was on the map and everything!

  58. Not quite there by astralbat · · Score: 2, Informative

    I love the smooth transitioning. But as far as detail goes, there isn't even any junction numbers on the roads. Not very useful when planning a journey. I think I will stick with http://www.multimap.com/ in the meantime!

  59. Google Maps India? by naveenkumar.s · · Score: 0

    Will the maps show PoK as part of India or Pakistan? What about the Rann of Kutch? And Ladakh. And Arunachal Pradesh.
    I may mod-ed down for troll, but India has too many disputed territories, and if Google takes a side, it becomes a political issue.

  60. What? No UK satellite service? by scupper · · Score: 1

    And to think, all my hard work in Wiltshire wasted. At least we got cool tin foil hats.

  61. Google is taking over... by whitetiger0990 · · Score: 1

    the WORLD!!! mwahaha
    First America... then Canada... now the UK!!!
    I for one will be praising the Google Overlords tonight!

    I'm waiting for full satellite images. They didn't even link to them in the UK version.

    --
    You have been warned.
  62. Strange by smallguy78 · · Score: 1

    I submitted this new article yesterday (when it appeared on neowin) and it was rejected. And now it mysteriously appears. Not that I could give a crapucino, but Timothy is obviously an attention whore.

    -1 Troll here i come

    --
    Nothing costs nothing
  63. something I wish google maps US had.. by rogueuk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    it's nice that in london, it shows the tube stations right on the map.

    It doesn't do this for the metro, in DC for instance. That would definitely be a useful feature to have when planning trips and the like

  64. Google Maps India by Liveandletlive · · Score: 1

    Have they really given any timelines for realizing google maps for India? Any ideas?

    --
    I know the world exists because I exist.
  65. But I saw Ireland by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

    Has Ireland come back to UK? I didn't notice that.

    --
    There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    1. Re:But I saw Ireland by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      Northern Ireland has...

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
  66. Bloody Hell!!! by virid · · Score: 1

    UK Google Maps marks the London Underground tube stops on the map!

    Why doesn't NY (or any other US city) get the same treatment???

    --
    "The world only exists in your eyes. You can make it as big or as small as you want." - F Scott Fitzgerald
    1. Re:Bloody Hell!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody gives a crap about public transportation in the US. We invented the automobile, remember?

      That said, Yahoo Maps has at least the NYC subway system; you have to add the stations as overlays just like they let you add restaurants or banks. It shows the line names, too, which Google Maps UK doesn't seem to. Without knowing which line(s) stop at a station, it requires a whole other website visit to plan your route.

    2. Re:Bloody Hell!!! by virid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Public transportation is a viable option in NYC as opposed to other parts of the country. So the New Yorkers care, at least.

      I never realized Yahoo Maps had the public transportation option, which is cool. I agree, having the different line options on the map is critical information.

      --
      "The world only exists in your eyes. You can make it as big or as small as you want." - F Scott Fitzgerald
    3. Re:Bloody Hell!!! by pklong · · Score: 1

      It shows underground and some rail stations, but outside London it just shows rail lines, which is completely useless. Just try looking for Barnstaple station for instance.

      --

      Philip

      Signatures are broken

  67. From memory... by aug24 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The OS here (whom I worked for till last September or so) use a double-orthogonal approach. That is, they flatten left and right sides of the country relative to their respective centre lines, then marry the two images. This makes measurement errors smaller.

    International maps tend to use a simple Mercator projection.

    Someone from the OS will hopefully be along shortly to correct my terminology... Nigel T? Dave R? Are you reading?

    Justin.

    --
    You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    1. Re:From memory... by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 2, Funny

      Someone from the OS will hopefully be along shortly to correct my terminology...

      Why do I feel like I just entered TRON?

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    2. Re:From memory... by aug24 · · Score: 1

      It's taken me four hours to get that gag... shit.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  68. Don't bother sending them feedback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I just tried sending them some feedback but pressing submit gave me "Illegal Request: your client sent an illegal request". Aaargghh. But so the typing is not completely wasted, here are my suggestions:

    Dear Google,

    Thanks for adding UK maps to google maps.

    Your user interface is excellent, but I have a few suggestions for how other aspects of the system can be improved to match this quality:

    1. Please display the scale of the maps.

    2. Please show railway lines. (I know that where you come from, everyone has a car. Here in Europe trains are the main method of long-distance travel for very many people.) Oh, I've noticed that you do show railways but only when you're zoomed in a lot. That's no good, here's way: say I am staying with my sister in Nettlecombe, Dorset (look it up!) and I want to know where the nearest railway stations are. So I view Nettlecombe and zoom out step by step. But by the time I am looking at an area large enough to show the stations in Axminster (to the West) and Dorchester (to the East), you have stopped showing railways! You also need to add the stations themselves.

    3. Please can we have metric units in the directions?

    4. In your driving directions, roundabouts ("traffic circles", I think, is the American expression) are described in an odd way. Your software does at least know which side of the road we drive on here! But at a roundabout with four roads where I have to turn right, i.e. I need to go 270 degrees round, it says "turn left, go 0.1 miles, turn left". It would be far better to say just "turn right" or "take the third exit".

    5. You should show junction numbers on motorways, and use them in directions, e.g. "continue along M3 for 38km to junction 4". This is the main way in which people describe motorway journeys (e.g. radio traffic news - "accident between junctions 6 and 7") and the junction numbers are displayed very prominantly on signs.

    6. There is more to life than roads. Have a look at the maps used on multimap.co.uk when the scale is 1:25,000 (but not at any other scale). I use these maps to plan my hiking trips. In fact, this is probably my main use for online maps.

  69. Old Maps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its a pity the map they used is old, the A120 does not go through Takeley anymore. The map they use is atleast two years old or more.

  70. Cinema's by DigitalSmash · · Score: 1

    .. real nice, however minor point try searching for 'Cinema', it seems you need to enter 'Cinemas'

  71. So much for "don't be evil"! by Andy_R · · Score: 1
    It's just told me to install Active X!

    ... on my Macintosh!

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    1. Re:So much for "don't be evil"! by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1

      Didn't for me, in Safari 1.3 with PithHelmet. Were you using IE for Mac?

      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
    2. Re:So much for "don't be evil"! by Andy_R · · Score: 1

      Yes, but on an old MacOS 9 machine... looks like you need OSX to see the maps, as the last Mozilla and Netscapes for the old box won't show them either.

      It's a pity they didn't offer a Flash version (yes I know I'm the only pro-Flash voice on Slashdot!), because that would give them their functionality on most odd browsers.

      --
      A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
  72. Where are the local roads? by Mr.+McGibby · · Score: 1

    Funny that this comes up now, because I have be researching my family who came from northern ireland and trying to find info on the area they are from online has been difficult at best.

    So I jump on this only to find that detailed street maps are only available for major cities. Not particularly useful for much else.

    --
    Mad Software: Rantings on Developing So
  73. Satellite Images? by cyklo · · Score: 1

    If they end up introducing satellite images for large areas of the world, surely a universal projection scale would make it a lot easier to skip from country to country?

  74. Google owns a satellite by BobPaul · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know people would say that Google can just buy satellite images from an independent source

    Not that it changes your post much, but Google's aquisition of KeyHole netted them a satellite or two.

    You can find out more on the Keyhole.com website under What are Google's Plans with KeyHole

    Interestingly enough, if you try to select "India" from the drop down, you'll find it isn't there. Google has no plans for posting satellite images of India beyond the 1km resolution they plan to do the entire world using.

    1. Re:Google owns a satellite by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      Yes, the reason why there's no satellite data available on India is 'coz till December 2003, it was illegal to shoot aerial shots of the country without governmental supervision.

      Things should fast change, though, after they launch the Cartosat in May.

  75. nice to see... by zarniwhoop · · Score: 1

    such major conurbations as Diss and Mold make it onto the main map.

  76. Not just Northern Ireland by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

    There are no streets at all in Cuba and Mexico.^-^

    --
    Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
  77. So they are out for World Domination by MacBoy · · Score: 1

    Allow me to wear my Devil's Advocate hat for a moment...

    Did you ever notice how "evil" countries/leaders often publicly claim to be not evil, just like the Google guys. Yet secretely, they vie for world domination. What if Google only claims to be not evil, but really they are trying to control the world's access to information in some sort of evil plot for world domination? How do we know that these satellite images are accurate and unretouched? What if they edit them to make certain cities or areas more or less attractive, like where they are buying/selling real estate for profit? I mean, soon you'll be able to see the conditions under which anyone else in the world lives... or at least you can see it as Google wants to present it, where it wants to present it.

    I'm taking off the hat now. It doean't fit me well.

    I do think it's cool how I can see a satellite image of my home, complete with my car in the driveway and patio furniture in the back yard. Cool and kind of scary.

  78. Come, friendly bombs.... by Old+Telco+Guy · · Score: 1

    Swindon to Slough

  79. All alone in a very big ocean. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Kinda like the World According to Google, isn't it...

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  80. Nice, but a long way to go... by redeye69 · · Score: 0

    They've a fair bit to go on this yet, there is no real map data outside of Belfast and it can't even give me directions from Belfast to Dublin at the minute.

    Certainly doesnt compare to the AA's Route Planner but has a lot of potential. Would be nice to get some good hi-res sat images of Ireland too.

    --
    Without precision, my life would be imprecise....
  81. Re:Funny place names by MynockGuano · · Score: 1

    The world according to Google.

    Hey, so there really IS something on the other side of that big lake!

    Who knew?

  82. Why not try pakistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why not pakistan next ... might catch some terrorists that way !!!!

  83. Google Maps in India? by Mr.Bananas · · Score: 1

    "can we expect Google Maps India next?"

    They'll never do Google Maps in India. I recently went there and it turns out they're very paranoid about maps of their cities, especially those close to borders. Sometimes, detailed maps of any place are very hard to come by, and you can just forget about maps and satellite images of Delhi. Until the government of India takes a more modern approach towards maps, I don't see there being a Google Maps for India.

  84. Limited Accuracy - Limited Use by rokzy · · Score: 1

    I just typed in my home postcode. In the UK a postcode typically localises you to one side of a particular street. The google map was off by 2 whole streets and offered no other info about the precise location, despite the fact that 99% of all web shops can fill in my entire address (except for a list of 10 or so possible house numbers) just from my postcode.

    1. Re:Limited Accuracy - Limited Use by VdG · · Score: 1

      Whether it's one or both sides of a street will vary from place to place. It would typically cover the entirety of a small cul-de-sac, for example. Every place in a single postcode will be on the same delivery route, (but there might be multiple postcodes in any given route, because that;s urely an operational matter).

      Here's the official Post Code standard. Not terribly exciting, but what the hell...
      http://www.govtalk.gov.uk/gdsc/html/frames/PostCod e-2-1-Release.htm

  85. Anti-patriotism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those anti-patriotic bastards at google have labeled London's tube stations, but not Washington DC's Metro stops?!?!?! John Ashcroft would never have put up with this kind of crap.

  86. Addresses suck by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1
    All U.S. street number stuff can be found.

    What about:
    The Grange, Thorpe Mandeville nr Banbury, Northants?

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:Addresses suck by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Can't find my Tobacconist.
      34 south haymarket, london SW1Y

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  87. that wasn't on there by midgley · · Score: 1

    yesterday! (I think)

  88. Re:Funny place names by BinaryOpty · · Score: 1

    But the world in satellite view shows it all!

  89. From a yank's perspective... by Combuchan · · Score: 1

    Looking at the map of London compared to my home neighborhood in Phoenix, AZ, it looks like London was laid out by a four year old with a giant piece of paper and a big crayon. Nothing but scribbles for as far as the eye can see.

    Why is it that a simple street grid is almost unheard of except in cities that primarily developed until after the automobile's invention?

    --
    "[T]he single essential element on which all discoveries will be dependent is human freedom." -- Barry Goldwater
    1. Re:From a yank's perspective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      London is a real city. It exists because people really, really wanted to live there. They crowded there, throwing up buildings faster than any authority could have knocked them down even if it had wanted to -- for several hundred years. If someone put up a palace, or a fortress for any reason, it became the back wall, the foundation or supporting infrastructure for countless smaller, unofficial dwellings, clinging on. When people tried to build things in the surrounding countryside, the city grew to enclose them.

      When the city BURNED DOWN, planners had to fight to rebuild it according to any sort of plan at all before mobs threw up shacks and started the whole process over. We're lucky that ANY of the inner city has roads more than 2m wide.

      Six times as many people live in London itself compared to Phoenix, yet it's only a fraction larger.

      You can't use a car in London, I'm surprised there's any point to owning one in Phoenix. Is there something wrong with your public transport network?

    2. Re:From a yank's perspective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try looking at the street plan of the centre of Salisbury, which dates from the 13th century.

    3. Re:From a yank's perspective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ancient Greeks considered the question, actually. One thing was while grids made finding things easier, they were of more benefit for strangers (who didn't spend years learning the layout of the city) than locals (who grew up with it). As a result, grids would benefit invading armies disproportionately.

  90. Now why does UK get train stations? by zakharin · · Score: 0

    My problem with all the online maps (and most other maps) in the US is that there are no train stations listed on any of them. And I'm not just talking about small commuter rail, but large stations too. Penn Station Shoe Repair anyone? Or 30th street hair station? Yes, I suppose you could approximate where the real station is by names of nearby businesses, but why?

    And what if you don't know the name? Searching for "Train Station" in NYC returns "Perth Amboy Station" as the first train-related match because it has a Wi-Fi hotspot. Railroad Station gives better results for NYC thanks to Amtrak, but not all Amtrak stations have a "Station Services" location. In Iselin, NJ (Metropark Station) the first result is for Newark.

  91. Hrm, where's little whingling? by drwho · · Score: 2, Funny

    4 Privet Drive, Little Whingling, Surrey doesn't work! But hey, you get strange results when you try to map Hogwarts, try it.

  92. No residential addresses? by metamatic · · Score: 1

    I tried my last four addresses, and it didn't have any of them. Does it not have residential addresses?

    In fact, the address search seems to be quite broken. A search for "Brays Close, Hyde Heath" fails, yet if you search for just "Hyde Heath" and zoom in, you can see Brays Close on the map.

    Also, it generally fails if you supply a house number, but works if you supply just the street.

    Oh well, it's still in beta...

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  93. Now Underground lines shown by baker_tony · · Score: 1
    YAY! The maps show the underground stations! BOO they don't show where the lines go. Guess that isn't such a big deal, but still.

    Also, I've noticed that some of the overground train stations are in the wrong place, not even near the rail lines in some places! I zoomed into my place (Surrey Quays, London) and see that South Bermondsey Station is on a main road... At least they show the rail lines.

    1. Re:Now Underground lines shown by radish · · Score: 1

      Ahhhh... South Bermondsey... that takes me back :) Standing on the windiest station platform known to man waiting for the 2 carriage connex train to arrive, only for it to be so full there's physically no space for anyone else to fit in it. All this for a 5 minute ride to London Bridge. I think about it sometimes when I'm riding the ferry across the Hudson to Manhattan :)

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    2. Re:Now Underground lines shown by baker_tony · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but it does have one of the best views of the city. You can pretty much make out all of London's major features... well, you only see Canary Wharf in winter when there are no leaves on the trees...

      Been a few years since I've lived there myself.

  94. Road names missing but can still search for them by baker_tony · · Score: 1

    I've noticed that some of the smaller roads are unnammed, but you can still search for them and it will pinpoint where they are for you (e.g. Canon Beck road, London).

  95. What about ... by blogeasy · · Score: 1

    the satellite imagery? How are we going to see what things look like down there?

    --

    Browse the Information Directory
  96. But does it map Royston Vasey by tyagiUK · · Score: 2

    and provide local maps for local people?

    --
    Contribute to the online videogame encyclopedia: GamerWiki
  97. Re:OK, I'm impressed.- I'm kind of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -ve from my 10 minute UK trial
    Postcode matching doesn work that well. You'll be 1-2 roads out when you zoom to the most detailed level.

    Townname curry searches or townname pizza doesn't work that well for me in the KT13 area.

    +ve
    Quick and intuitive. Bizness listings are great. '3d effect maps are good' and I love the directions.

  98. Brain damaged post codes & no street numbers by Macka · · Score: 1


    Not to mention the fact that it can't place Post Codes correctly. If I enter mine, it points to a place about 100 yards away, in someone's back garden! Not even on the road, never mind my street or my house.

    The lack of street numbers limits it a bit too.

  99. Passports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, by my reckoning, as an Irish passport holder native to the north-east of Ireland, all of Ireland is one nation and one country. By means of selective partitioning (to falsely maintain a British majority in a region pumped with English capital), the British severed a portion of Irish territory off to remain under British rule and occupation following the IRA's decision to make peace in 1921 without winning the War of Independence.

    The region of the nation where I live may still be governed by the English, but it is still one nation and those of us who believe that certainly don't share a common passport with the Scots, Welsh and English.

  100. just the USA by spinctrl · · Score: 1

    now, if you zoom all the way out, you get to see all America's states, including the 51st.

  101. Now if only I could find my keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could map out a path to the UK from Texas
    --
    random signiture #3

  102. GOOGLE MAP FORUMS by Jleagle · · Score: 1

    hey i just mde these, not much atm but hopefully soon

    http://www.maps.jimeagle.com/

    --
    WWW.JIMEAGLE.COM
  103. The UK stands for the United Kingdom of GB and NI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The United Kingdom's full title is actually the United Kingdom of Great Britan and Northern Ireland. Great Britan is made up of England, Wales and Scotland.

    Confusingly, there is a Parliament for the UK (with elections at present), and NI has a devolved government, as does Scotland. Wales has its own assembly (which may be upgraded to a full parliament in the not too distant future). There's nothing to govern England on its own, though, other than the UK parliament; so Scottish and NI people can tell England (and Wales) what to do :-)

    Incidentally; a note to Americans and other aliens: don't call a Scottish person 'English'. They hate it. British is the correct term; but better still, Scottish. The same is also true of the Welsh.

  104. (All) Ireland is a country, in some contexts by blorg · · Score: 1

    There are certain contexts in which it is appropriate to refer to all of Ireland as a "country." The word is not synonymous with "nation state," which all of Ireland certainly is not. Referring to all Ireland as a "country" in this way is not making any political claim in the present day but rather simply recognising a common history and culture.

    The Wikipedia article on "Country" has a good discussion of this. The United Kingdom, for example, is a nation state but it is made up of three countries (England, Scotland and Wales) and one province (Northern Ireland). Other examples where country and nation state are not synonymous include, for example, the Basque Country, which uses the word "country" in the primary languages of the two nation states it is spread over (País Vasco in Spanish, Pays-Basque in French).

    The most obvious example of where this nomenclature is uncontroversially used with regard to Ireland is probably in rugby, where the Six nations tournament is made up of the "countries" of England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland, France, and Italy.

  105. Interesting you should say that... by blorg · · Score: 1

    We're all part of the european superstate these days, anyhow. ;-(

    Public attitude towards the EU is probably one of the key differentiators between the Irish and the British these days

    1. Re:Interesting you should say that... by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Yes, if EU cash was pouring into the UK instead of out, we might well have a different attitude.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  106. Believe it or not... by blorg · · Score: 1

    ...there is a Guinness ad (called "Swim to the States") in which someone does just that...