Slashdot Mirror


Go Daddy Usurps Network Solutions

miller60 writes "Go Daddy has passed Network Solutions as the top domain registrar, and now manages more than 6.8 million domains. This marks the first time that any registrar other than Network Solutions has held the top spot. The change is no surprise, given the growth trends and pricing for the two providers ($8.95 for Go Daddy, $34.99 for Network Solutions), but its controversial Super Bowl ads no doubt helped put Go Daddy over the top."

349 comments

  1. The uncut GoDaddy ad here by winkydink · · Score: 5, Informative

    but first, like any good Slashdotter, I must pick nits and point out that waaaaay back in the last century, SRI held the top spot too.

    The ad is here. Be gentle.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:The uncut GoDaddy ad here by Veinor · · Score: 1

      By the way, the GoDaddy.wmv link doesn't link to a .wmv; you'll probably need to save it as one.

    2. Re:The uncut GoDaddy ad here by nb+caffeine · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thanks Winky, I have been casually searching for that (probably not hard enough) since the bowl. I have been a godaddy customer for 3 years now, love their service. have their cheapest hosting plan, and it works well for me, and that ad made me sure that godaddy was the type of company I want to do buisness with :)

      --

      "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
    3. Re:The uncut GoDaddy ad here by Enigma_Man · · Score: 4, Funny

      Can you describe the commercial(s)? I'm at work and don't want to be watching vids of something that'd get me any heat.

      Thanks!
      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    4. Re:The uncut GoDaddy ad here by winkydink · · Score: 1

      Ouch. Not to self: Always check both browsers. IE, I'm sad to say, does the right thing with it. Firefox users will need to "Save As".

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    5. Re:The uncut GoDaddy ad here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where can i get ahold of the super bowl ad? Thanks!

    6. Re:The uncut GoDaddy ad here by winkydink · · Score: 1

      PG-13 You don't need the audio though it is amusing. :)

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    7. Re:The uncut GoDaddy ad here by good-n-nappy · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can get the ad from GoDaddy themselves here.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of fiber.
    8. Re:The uncut GoDaddy ad here by XanC · · Score: 1

      Actually, IE does the wrong thing with it. It just so happens that two wrongs make a "right" for that particular combination of client and server.

    9. Re:The uncut GoDaddy ad here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Or, instead of waiting 45 minutes to download the file from this mirror, you can see it immediately from GoDaddy's site. Just select Full "Web Only" Censorship Hearing, enter in the numeric code (apparently to prevent automated retrieval), and it will play as a high-quality Flash movie.

    10. Re:The uncut GoDaddy ad here by KefabiMe · · Score: 1

      A streaming version of the video can be found here: http://www.godaddy.com/gdshop/superbowl05/landing. asp

      This streaming video was going quite a bit faster than the Network Mirror link. (1 hour download compared to a couple of minutes.)

    11. Re:The uncut GoDaddy ad here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      A well-endowed woman is standing before a committee of old fogeys trying to convince them to let her advertize for Go Daddy. She has the company name on her tank top. When she points to it, one of the straps breaks and the top almost falls off, but she catches the strap and the top stays on. Then they ask her what the ad would look like, and she does a slinky dance. That's about it.

    12. Re:The uncut GoDaddy ad here by rovingeyes · · Score: 2, Funny

      How many erotic novels have you written till date?

    13. Re:The uncut GoDaddy ad here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      more like PG

    14. Re:The uncut GoDaddy ad here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      three

    15. Re:The uncut GoDaddy ad here by winkydink · · Score: 1

      Well, since posting the mirror, it's been downloaded over 13,000 times. Either the machine can handle a boatload of simultaneous connections, or it's taking a lot less than 45 minutes to download, thank you very much.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    16. Re:The uncut GoDaddy ad here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "To see the download window please disable your popup blocker."

      Fuck that.

  2. It's annoying... by Veinor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think that advertisement agencies should not use controversy to promote their sales. The commercials do make me remember GoDaddy, but not in a positive way. And if this worked in general, you would think that SCO's sales would go up among the geek community. But, we know what's really happened, don't we?

    1. Re:It's annoying... by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Are you kidding me? The GoDaddy ad was NOT that controversial. Take one look at any of the prime time reality shows on the air and you will see WAY more sexual content and inappropriate behavior. The Super Bowl was just a sore spot, thats all. Heck, take a look at the new Victoria's Secret ad... Whew!!

      -d

      --
      "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    2. Re:It's annoying... by Veinor · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I'm not saying that it's incredibly controversial, but there probably are some people that could be offended by it.

    3. Re:It's annoying... by mmkkbb · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well obviously we shouldn't do anything that might offend somebody somewhere.

      --
      -mkb
    4. Re:It's annoying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm offended that you think that something might offend someone somewhere.

    5. Re:It's annoying... by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can't bear the thought of offending somebody, somewhere, so I am simply going to remove myself from the world to solve the problem.

      Oh, wait, that would offend some people.

      Help me! Heeeeeeeellllllp meeeeeeeeee!

      KFG

    6. Re:It's annoying... by ad0gg · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm offended by Menstrual products ads during dinner time.

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    7. Re:It's annoying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so obvious, but it's probably not possible to do anything that might not offend anyone, anywhere.

    8. Re:It's annoying... by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1
      On the contrary the reason I like the commercial is how over the top it is. One one hand I feel offended that a pair of tits attached to annoying voice passes as a spokesperson, on the other hand I have to give them points for unabashedly appealing to the base instincts of their audience. Its like Howard Stern or those Coors commercials, the first couple times its hilarious and appalling just how absurd it is. They better not try to run a whole strings of these though, then it would just get stupid.

      Either way I find it far less controversial and creepy than those Burger King commercials.

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    9. Re:It's annoying... by metlin · · Score: 1

      Heck, take a look at the new Victoria's Secret ad... Whew!!

      I'd love to!

      Where can I find it?

    10. Re:It's annoying... by JagRoth · · Score: 1

      Ok... I've watched the Victoria's Secret ad over and over, and I still can't find the.... uhm... what was I looking for again?

    11. Re:It's annoying... by eck011219 · · Score: 1

      Controversial means that there was controversy. I agree that it wasn't particularly offensive on the ever-sliding scale of network TV, but it sure got a bunch of people's knickers in knots for some reason.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    12. Re:It's annoying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've gotta be kidding me. SCO violates copyright, a community license, engages in lawsuits, lies, charges $600 per license, and that would be "in general" equivalent to a hot and sexy girl poking fun at the FCC in a Super Bowl commercial advertising a service that is 25% of the major competitor who, besides, overcharging, didn't advertising well to the general population.

      Yeah. Right. Whatever.

    13. Re:It's annoying... by NecroPuppy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I, for one, welcome our non-offensive overlords.

      --
      I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
    14. Re:It's annoying... by clausiam · · Score: 1
      I, for one, welcome our non-offensive overlords.

      How dare you post such offensive material in public view. "Overlords" is clearly a sexually discriminative term as "lord" means "a man of rank or high position, or a a nobleman". I strongly suggest you change that to the more appropriate "I, for one, welcome our non-offensive over-highly-ranking-person".

      8-)

    15. Re:It's annoying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you gay?

    16. Re:It's annoying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is so such thing as bad publicity...

    17. Re:It's annoying... by sp5 · · Score: 1
      Well obviously we shouldn't do anything that might offend somebody somewhere.

      Not only that, but when you spend hundreds (or maybe millions) of dollars on advertising you don't want it to be memorable.

      Or to have people talk about it afterwards... I mean, that is so not what you set out to do.

      -sp-

    18. Re:It's annoying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm offended by Menstrual products ads during dinner time.

      I'm not usually really bothered, but I feel compelled to respond and note the new Tampax advert I saw last night. Picture this : couple are in a row boat. Romantic moment is interrupted by discovery that the boat is leaking. While man hunts for his bailing bucket, woman plugs hole with Tampax. For some reason, I find this more disturbing than the use of blue ink to demonstrate absorbency.

      I just think they should have gone the whole hog and named the product "Tampax Bilge Pumps".

    19. Re:It's annoying... by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      I'm not saying that it's incredibly controversial, but there probably are some people that could be offended by it.

      I'm not offended by it because of the imagery, but it did seem to be a pretty cheesy and slutty image they're making for their company and simply in bad taste. Unless their target market is 15-year olds, I'm not sure the commercial was well-targeted.

    20. Re:It's annoying... by chamblah · · Score: 1
      The commercials do make me remember GoDaddy, but not in a positive way.

      What negative thing to you think about when you remember the commercial?

      Scantily clad, attractive women tend promote positive memories for myself.

    21. Re:It's annoying... by dukerobillard · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it wasn't the sexual content, it was the subversive nature. They were making fun of the nutjobs that got upset by Janet Jackson the year before. That's not allowed.

    22. Re:It's annoying... by tenton · · Score: 1

      See, the funny thing about the "there's no such thing as bad publicity" is that it is true, to some extent. Over time, people tend to gloss why they know a company or name (in general). Using a bit of controversy to make the commercial memorable may ruffle a few feathers, but in the long run, it may still help (GoDaddy? I've heard of them. They can't be too bad).

    23. Re:It's annoying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well obviously we shouldn't do anything that might offend somebody somewhere.

      Well, at least if that person is a deranged lunatic that will kill you for saying it, maybe not. Or even if they aren't a deranged lunatic, and will still kill you for saying it. Or, if you're just being an asshole.

      Pick your battles.

    24. Re:It's annoying... by Dark_Gravity · · Score: 1
      Are you kidding me? The GoDaddy ad was NOT that controversial.

      True dat.

      Controversy != Satire

    25. Re:It's annoying... by Autonomous+Cow · · Score: 1

      Funny about that. The outfit and the moves made me uncomfortable... but I thought her voice was very nice.

      --
      The Autonomous Cow. Moo.
  3. more interesting by selectspec · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I find that there is a trade rag website called Domain Works far more interesting news. What happens in the exciting world of URL names?

    --

    Someone you trust is one of us.

  4. Porn Sites by chucks86 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Any registrar that would sells names to the tons of porn sites is destined to be number 1. (Warning: This post is probably incorrect.)

    --
    Help a poor college student. Send a couple cents via paypal to chucks86@gmail.com
    1. Re:Porn Sites by ChaosCube · · Score: 3, Informative

      Are you kidding? Wasn't the internet made for academics, funded by the military, the hijacked by porn? It's been a while since college, but that's how I remember it.

      --
      BDR Gear
      Outdoor gear, MREs, and more!
  5. Network Solutions = OWNED by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    plain and simple
    competition is good.

    -d

    --
    "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    1. Re:Network Solutions = OWNED by Reignking · · Score: 1

      Nice to see a successful marketing story...well, that depends on their ROI, but they are on the right track. Well done.

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    2. Re:Network Solutions = OWNED by ZephyrXero · · Score: 1

      I wonder if NetSolutions will drop their prices soon?

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    3. Re:Network Solutions = OWNED by PixelCat · · Score: 1

      I wonder if NetSolutions will drop their prices soon?

      I wouldn't count on it. They dropped from $50 to $35 way back when other registrars started appearing--how many years ago was that? Sure, they have volume discounting now, but the 1-year price hasn't gone down in, effectively, forever.

  6. I'm shocked those ads are working by Whafro · · Score: 0, Troll

    An ugly chick and dude who seems to join her in the club for people with shit for brains... I guess it's all just about the name recognition.

    I bought a domain from GoDaddy a few years ago, and then have been determined to transfer it elsewhere since I saw those ads, as it made me see the company as rather pathetic.

    1. Re:I'm shocked those ads are working by homerules · · Score: 0

      I could care less about a commercial, I care about my wallet.

  7. Yeah, but with GoDaddy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    You have to surf through 240 pages of adverts when all you really want to do is click "checkout".

    1. Re:Yeah, but with GoDaddy by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 1

      You don't have to. There is some kind of "expert" option IIRC, that lets you skip all that shtuff.

      -d

      --
      "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    2. Re:Yeah, but with GoDaddy by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, it's so expert, that even the Experts can't find the thing.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  8. Vote with your wallet by Vamphyri · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In this service economy, consumers have chosen to vote with their wallet. No surprise there. Way back when in internet years, Joker.com was only ten euro's per year, which was about $6 US and they were the best. Joker didn't have the marketing clout that Godaddy had. Now GoDaddy has usurped the top spot.

    1. Re:Vote with your wallet by garcia · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Or you can know that NetSol (as of 11/2004) likes to hold domains during transfers until they go over the expiration date to make it EXTREMELY difficult for you to move away from them.

      They are also difficult to deal with over the phone, over the Internet, etc.

      I was completely disappointed in their service and while attempting to move elsewhere ran into the problems above. Luckily I won't have to deal w/them again in the near future and I hope no one else does either.

    2. Re:Vote with your wallet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've registered numerous domains with Joker.com, and even though they aren't the cheapest (due to the Euro killing the CAD/USD) I never experienced any problems with their hosted mail forwarding, DNS hosting, and host of other options.

      I've used Yahoo domains, not as good, but decent, 1and1.com (only because I got a free .info domain out of them ;-)- their interface and options are quite limited.

      I used Tucows in the past (3 years ago or so) and their service then was quite average.

      Check out Joker.com, aside from the bilingual (english+german) message, everything else is quite nice :-)

    3. Re:Vote with your wallet by duffbeer703 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I always found it amazing that Network Solutions combined premium pricing with nonexistant customer service and managed to stay in business... absolutely amazing.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    4. Re:Vote with your wallet by Xzzy · · Score: 1

      I did a transfer away from Network Solutions less than two months ago.

      Either they cleaned up their act, or I got lucky. Opened a ticket to get the auth-id's, they sent them to me in less than a day. Inititated transfer from new registrar, netsol sent me an alert and said the transfer would happen in 5 days. 5 days later.. it went off without a hitch.

      Not saying they're a great company, else I wouldn't have transferred to a new registrar. Just that they do seem to be improving. By tiny amounts. ;)

    5. Re:Vote with your wallet by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Their customer service has improved markedly. I've been with them for the few domains I have because it's convenient, stable, not spattered with ads, and because I get airline miles when I keep going with them (not the best reason, but I'd like to be able to fly first class someday). Early on in my experiences with them, customer service was slow and kind of haphazard. Recently, on the rare occasion where I do need to go to them, even e-mail responses from real people are fairly snappy, and phone calls are handled professionally with courtesy and knowledge.

      I may simply be lucky, but I don't mind them at all.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    6. Re:Vote with your wallet by hometoast · · Score: 1

      Have any of you ever actually CALLED netsol? The fact that you can get someone on the phone alone should be more than enough to beat customer service of other companies, let alone, getting someone in the US and a live person at that. I've always had quick responses and pleasant people on the phone the handful of times I've called.

      and FYI: no registrar can hold the domain until after the expiration date. That, after the tranfer is authorized, is completely up to the registry (5-7 days verisign allows for .com/net tranfers). Any other wait is dictated by the amount of time that the gaining registrar allows for the tranfer to be authorized. So netsol has nothing (or VERY little) to do with delays in transfers away from them. I've been waiting a week for a tranfer from dotster TO netsol; and that timeframe is made by verisign.

    7. Re:Vote with your wallet by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 1

      GOdaddy has a couple of hundred people working phones and ALL of them are in the US - AZ and Iowa.

      --
      ymmv
    8. Re:Vote with your wallet by hometoast · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      as does NS. 300+ and counting. (mark me offtopic pls)

    9. Re:Vote with your wallet by doombob · · Score: 1

      And did they also ask why you were transferring everytime you moved a domain off of them? When I talked to them on the phone, they were more worried about the possibility of me transferring a domain than actually helping me. I did a search on their site trying to find out how to get our AUTH CODE for a .biz, but all their support said was "Please contact your current registrar to request your authorization code." So I was like YOU ARE MY CURRENT REGISTRAR. Then I had to spend an hour on the phone getting the right answer. I hope I don't have to deal with them very much longer...

    10. Re:Vote with your wallet by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      I believe what the poster meant was their absurd policy (at least, it was their policy the last time I had to move a domain away from them) that if a domain is within 90 days of needing renewal, you must renew it before they'll release it for transfer.

      It wouldn't surprise me to find out that they'd held up registrations 94 or so days from renewal so it'd be 90 days when they wound up dealing with 'em.

    11. Re:Vote with your wallet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have over 6 domains through last year and I have never had any problem with Netsol. I did couple transfer and did couple DNS setup and that is about it. I called them several times and each time the response time is about 2 to 3 minutes. Much better than most companies out there (not just domain companies). So I have no idea why people trash talking about NetSol.

    12. Re:Vote with your wallet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i agree. im using joker.com and its awesome.

    13. Re:Vote with your wallet by myov · · Score: 1

      Netsol... I love them as much as my cell carrier.

      In at least one case, I started moving a domain over early for exactly this reason. Somewhere along the line NetSol screwed up and denied the transfer (it's not like they have a history of this, right?). When I called them, the basic answer was "pay us for another year and you can move it then". Ignoring that I didn't want to pay them and I already had an open transfer with someone else. Go daddy had to credit back my transfer (however, not until I complained - so they could have billed me for a domain that didn't actually transfer)

      --
      I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
    14. Re:Vote with your wallet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In this service economy, consumers have chosen to vote with their wallet. No surprise there. Way back when in internet years, Joker.com was only ten euro's per year, which was about $6 US and they were the best. Joker didn't have the marketing clout that Godaddy had. Now GoDaddy has usurped the top spot.

      Which would mean your wrong. Instead of the consumer "voting with there wallet", that is, choose the most desirable and market friendly product, they have been relieved of that opportunity. What your saying is that via the obfuscation tactics of GoDaddy, joker (the implied cheaper company) was pushed out of the market. A bad analogy (because it doesn't really work) would be the tactics Microstuffed currently takes in opposition to linux.

    15. Re:Vote with your wallet by doombob · · Score: 1

      I guess we're just more likely to have problems since we have more domains. We have a couple hundred and about 1 in 10 usually ends up being a problem. We're slowly moving domains off of them so as not to disrupt too many of our customers sites.

  9. Is it just me? by northcat · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Offtopic: Is it just me or when you click on that superbowl ad link in firefox, firefox doesn't actually go to that page and just displays a blank white page? It happens to me with other links too. Usually when this happens, if i restart firefox, I can visit that link properly. Has anyone else experienced this? Is this some reported bug (with a solution) that I'm not aware of?

    1. Re:Is it just me? by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 1

      I think there is an extention available that will get rid of that behavior in firefox. "Disable Targets for Downloads"

      -d

      --
      "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
  10. .bomb take II? by gtrubetskoy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Personally I'd much rather see GoDaddy surpass NetSol in profit than number of domains. It's not difficult to sell products cheaper than anyone else - remember all the free stuff during the .com boom?

    6.8 million domains times $8.95 - do the math - this is hardly a lot of annual revenue. GoDaddy is a privately held company, so no details on their financial standing are available. Their infrastructure and staff expenses have to be pretty significant (just the DNS infrastructure and not to mention the SB ads), and it's very difficult for me to see how you can do this for $8.95/year, even if it's multiplied by 7 mil. Either they have an alternative source of revenue, or (most likely) you'll see them being bough out by the likes of NetSol (which will promptly jack the prices up on all the customers) and that's their whole "business plan".

    1. Re:.bomb take II? by Robert+Hayden · · Score: 5, Informative

      GoDaddy upsells all of their domains with options for SSL certs, privacy options, web hosting, email hosting, etc etc etc.

      Their revenues are much more than just domain registrations.

    2. Re:.bomb take II? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      almost $70 million and that isnt a lot of revenue?

      they dont exactly have that much in the way of expenses... say $20 mil TOPS.
      thats a huge profit

    3. Re:.bomb take II? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You are speaking without knowing what you're talking about. Well, typing. GoDaddy sells a lot more than domain registration - they have web and email hosting packages, for example. The domain registration thing gets people in the door - in droves. It doesn't supply a lot of revenue, but I'm pretty sure it's profitable, or at least can be.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:.bomb take II? by numark · · Score: 4, Informative

      Have you ever bought a domain from GoDaddy? They try to upsell you on a lot of things like hosting, "search engine ranking increaser" programs, and privately-registered domains. A lot of them are marked "Yes" by default, so I'm sure some people buy things without realizing it. Their hosting business also seems to be quite lucrative, so I'm sure that contributes to their bottom line. They also have pretty cheap SSL certificates, as well as backordered domains at a premium price, so I could see them having a good amount of money made per year.

      --
      Want Slashdot headlines on your site? Try SlashHead
    5. Re:.bomb take II? by nb+caffeine · · Score: 1

      They hook you with registering the domain, and have a bunch of other services you can get too (hosting, email, ecommerce, et al).

      I personally have my domain registered through them and use one of their hosting plans, because im too cheap to pay for colo/dedicated plans.

      godaddy has been good to me so far, their customer support spoke english(!) and was very helpful the few times ive had to call up (mostly about billing because im a deadbeat)

      --

      "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
    6. Re:.bomb take II? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      6.8 million domains times $8.95 - do the math

      Let's see: $61 million - (100 employes * $60000 [1]) - DNS and web infrastructure of $1,000,000 [2] - Super Bowl ad of $2,000,000 = $52 million in profit.

      I'd have to be of by orders of magnitude in a few areas for that not to be a sure-fire profit center.

      [1] I doubt it takes 100 professional-level employees to run something like that, but you never know.
      [2] Remember, you're only hosting the "domain parking" pages, and DNS for people with sites so small that the marginal costs per site are almost zero. The big customers (if any) pay extra for full-fledged services.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    7. Re:.bomb take II? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying boils down to "Their prices are so good, that they can't possibly be doing it and making a profit."

      A little Googling reveals that there are a lot of outfits out there doing inexpensive domain registrations.

      Even Yahoo is in on the cheap domain registration game. Granted, yahoo has a lot of other sources of revenue, but I believe that godaddy has relationships with hosting companies that I'm sure adds money to their bottom line.

      So, lets say that they are getting $0.50 per month for every referral that they make to a web hosting company. Let's just say that 20% of their registrations are of people who need a hosting service. We're talking about over 4 million dollars per year.

      To be fair, I arbitrarily picked those numbers, but I don't think that they're an unreasonable estimate.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    8. Re:.bomb take II? by CABAN · · Score: 1

      Any this is the reason I DON'T use GoDaddy. You click checkout and must pass 5-7 pages of bonus offers I'm not interested in.

    9. Re:.bomb take II? by Limecron · · Score: 1

      Your forgetting that the domain names are not free.

      GoDaddy has to pay ICANN for the domains. I'm not sure how much this is, but it is something.

      Not that I disagree that GoDaddy definitely makes some money. Especially with all of the other crap charges they try to hit you with.

    10. Re:.bomb take II? by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      6.8 million domains times $8.95 - do the math - this is hardly a lot of annual revenue.

      Dunno about you, but I'd be pretty happy with > $50 million in annual revenue...

      And in a market where they are selling the exact same thing, the only way to compete is on the basis of price.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    11. Re:.bomb take II? by GabboFlabbo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, I've registered about 5 domains recently at Go-Daddy (3 of which were transfers) and All options were defaulted off. All I had to do was find the "Continue" button and that was it.

      It's true they try to upsell a lot of stuff but I'm not sure where you're getting the "marked 'Yes' by default"

    12. Re:.bomb take II? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the mathematically challenged, thats about $60million a year. That's allot of money. Plus all the other "features" they sell, I'm sure they are profitable.

    13. Re:.bomb take II? by 3dr · · Score: 1

      I just registered a few weeks ago through GoDaddy and was certainly annoyed and even a bit confused by the numerous promotional pages one must navigate through to final check out. But it wasn't that bad, and all is fine.

      IIRC, the ICANN fee was around 50 to 80 cents; certainly less than $1.

      For hosting I went with WebHostingBuzz.com on a reco from a friend. $4/mo for 2GB disk storage, unlimited emails, subdomains, and 65GB bandwidth/month -- an insane deal for nerds.

    14. Re:.bomb take II? by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      There is also usually some start-up capital you have to pay back. Most are in the double or triple digit millions on that scale. I've seen companies with only 50 employees have 140 million in start-up revenue to dig out of.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    15. Re:.bomb take II? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you'd be surprised how little managing the DNS infrastructure at godaddy costs. very, very little.

    16. Re:.bomb take II? by spungebob · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not in GoDaddy's case...

      GoDaddy is owned by Bob Parsons, of Parson's Technology fame. Parson's Technology had tax and accounting software that rivaled Intuit's at half the cost. In the true spirit of American competition, Intuit responded by buying out Parson's, leaving Bob with a boatload of money and a forced 4-year retirement (as stipulated in the Intuit deal) in Arizona.

      After 4 years of boredom, Bob got back into the biz by starting up GoDaddy with the proceeds of the Intuit deal. GoDaddy was already paid for by the time they opened their doors.

      --
      It takes an idiot to do cool things - that's why it's cool!
    17. Re:.bomb take II? by Halvard · · Score: 1

      Definitely. Not only to they try to sleeze their way into an upsell but I've received a lot of spam from them. Well, I used to until I started sending their mail to /dev/null.

    18. Re:.bomb take II? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may be inexpensive but I know from other registrars that the NetSol still gets a cut of every domain. On top of the .50 icann fee NetSol takes $5 per domain since they control the top level domain. So every domain Godaddy sells makes netsol $5. So Netsol can sit back and let Godaddy, Register, or Tucows do all the heavy lifting and sit back and rake in the cash.

    19. Re:.bomb take II? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NetSol controls the .com TLD so until somebody takes that away from them they get a piece of every sale, I believe government has to do it. That is roughly $5 for every domain that everyone else sells. So by losing they are winning. Then there is the icann fee on top of that. Add in the cost of a couple hundred employees and infrastructure and the profits go down a little. So bottom line is Netsol needs to have the TLD taken away from them.

    20. Re:.bomb take II? by richarddshank · · Score: 1

      On GoDaddyRadio the other night, Bob Parsons said they did $102 million in sales last year.

    21. Re:.bomb take II? by sodul · · Score: 1

      What about 1and1.com ( http://www.1and1.com ) ? They are only $5.99/y provide full dns support and don't bloat their pages with 85% ads. Customer support is good, their tools are very nice and I did not get any problem so far. Only drawback is that you can't pay for more than 1 year, but if they raise the price you can still switch to godaddy. I have to admit I don't know how 1and1 is making any money off domain names but I guess they use that to sell hosting (quite good and cheap as well).

    22. Re:.bomb take II? by m101 · · Score: 1

      Actually there is quite a bit of publicly available information about GoDaddy's financial position. Various snippets from their blog: - Go Daddy has been cash flow positive and profitable since October 2001. - Go Daddy has no debt and no equipment leases. Except for the monthly rent we pay for our buildings (which we made the decision to lease), the company has no debt service or lease payments - Our sales this year were over $100 million. If we do nothing different (other than continue to promote our business the way we have been) our sales for 2005 should be about $170 million - All of the products we sell are developed by us. We currently employ over 30 development teams, and spend well over $3 million a month in new product development - we sell a new domain name at the rate of one every 7 seconds More here: http://www.bobparsons.com/index3.html True, their domain sales are a major part of their service however their value added services - as pushed (far too much so in my opinion) at the checkout are another stream.

    23. Re:.bomb take II? by mikis · · Score: 1

      Not anymore, they've cut it down to more reasonable level (2 or 3 pages).

    24. Re:.bomb take II? by stm2 · · Score: 1

      I went to WebHostingBuzz.com website to see their plans and it is WAY TOO CHEAP!. So I don't trust them, I mean, with that prices I doub how they could be in business for some time more. Do you have any guarantee? How do you know they won't leave tomorrow with all the money? I like the deal, but I am afraid of so low price.

      --
      DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
  11. no address verification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    is what put GoDaddy over the top. If you want to be dishonest and register a name without giving up any information -- like name and address -- GoDaddy is for you.

    Plus, the price difference isn't as much as advertised here: the domain registration price is if you host the URL with GoDaddy. Domain transfers cost you money with GoDaddy (and try getting them to give it up even with the proper documentation -- it's a huge pain), while they're free with Network Solutions.

    1. Re:no address verification by vinn01 · · Score: 1

      Since when is wanting privacy dishonest? ...and not wanting to be flooded with spam. ...and not having to pay "protection" to the registrar so they don't disclose your personal information to every marketing scumbag who wants it.

    2. Re:no address verification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the Internet is indeed a public resource -- and it is, unless you're paying ALL the costs of the Internet -- then accountability must be part of the equation.

      And accountability begins with disclosure.

    3. Re:no address verification by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      It's against icann rules to give invalid domain information when registering. Doing so, theey can take away your domain name. If you're so worried about privacy, then just get a bloody po box. They're only $8/month, and help far beyond domain registration.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    4. Re:no address verification by rylin · · Score: 1

      Nice troll, troll.
      When you transfer a domain, you pay the renewal fee of one year.
      It doesn't cost you anything extra - I would know, I recently transfered three domains to them from netsol.
      If you have a valid account for the domain, you can transfer without the slightest problem.
      If you've forgotten your account details, don't have access to the email address associated with the account etc, you have to update by fax.
      Just like with your precious netsol.
      $8.whatever / year is what the domain costs with godaddy. You'll get it even cheaper right now (sub $4 iirc) if you purchase one or more of their other services.

    5. Re:no address verification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pay an additional $96/year so that I can have the "convenience" of having to go to my post office, which is never open when I'm *not* at work to recover my spam snail mail? I got bitten once by putting my personal info into my domain registration. I've got bogus info there now. I've had the domain for a few years with no problem. Let ICANN find me, then I'll deal with their insecure policies.

    6. Re:no address verification by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Plus, the price difference isn't as much as advertised here: the domain registration price is if you host the URL with GoDaddy.

      that is the LARGEST lie I have ever heard.

      I have several .com and .org domains registered with godaddy and are hosted elsewhere. colortek as one for example. they do not "jack up my prices" and let me change my DNS information at will with no "fees" you are tyring to imply.

      i suggest that you get some REAL information as it seems that everything you say is 100% wrong.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:no address verification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let ICANN find me, then I'll deal with their insecure policies.

      They don't have to find you to take away your domain name.

    8. Re:no address verification by ady1 · · Score: 1

      you don't need to transfer you domain. all you need is to update the DNS server for the domain to your hosting provider.

    9. Re:no address verification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is what put GoDaddy over the top. If you want to be dishonest and register a name without giving up any information -- like name and address -- GoDaddy is for you.
      i dont know of any registrar that verifys contact info when registering. This would be a crazy use of resources.

      if there is a complaint on a domains contact info then the registrar investigates and asks the customer to update. if no update is made a fee is charged and eventually the domain is taken by the registrar.

      Plus, the price difference isn't as much as advertised here: the domain registration price is if you host the URL with GoDaddy. Domain transfers cost you money with GoDaddy (and try getting them to give it up even with the proper documentation -- it's a huge pain), while they're free with Network Solutions.

      this statement is WRONG.
      The price of a domain at GD is independant of where you host it or if you host it at all. transfers cost no matter what registrar you are going to. you may be confusing this with a Change Account which is when you move a domain from one account to another at the same registrar. GD does not charge for this nor do they require documentation. once again you are confusing this with a Change OF Account where someone has either lost their username and password and needs to verify ownership of the domain. any good registrar will require documentation since all they are verifying is the persons name in the Registrant field.

  12. Go Daddy vs Register.com by smartin · · Score: 1

    I have my internet domains with register.com for the simple reason that they provide DNS for me. Can anyone tell me how Go Daddy compares in this area? I'd sure like to pay $8/year insteal of $35.

    --
    The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
    1. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by zerkon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      they provide DNS, although IMHO it is a bit lacking. I own two domains through GoDaddy and they are just simple MX records, an A record and a few CNAMES. if you are fairly simple with your DNS needs you're ok, get too complex and they might not be the best choice for you... although if you get too complex chances are it means you can afford better than $8 a year.

      they do however allow you to do the DNS yourself if thats your thing, which i've considered doing but with the number of Bind vulnerabilities out there it just seems easier to let them do it (and yes I know what djbdns is... i hate it)

    2. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by athakur999 · · Score: 1

      GoDaddy only provides DNS service if you host with them or you want to use their "parked domain" page.

      There are plenty of free DNS providers out there though. I used to use everydns.net and had a good experience with them. It's free although donations are welcome.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    3. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by Morgon · · Score: 1

      www.everydns.net - Don't get locked into DNS for 4 times the cost!

      --
      [DISCLAIMER: This post is a work of satire and should not be misconstrued as a holy text upon which to base a religion.]
    4. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by smartin · · Score: 1

      This sounds like what I want, do they allow the A record to point to my machine? I don't want their hosting service i just want them to direct my domain to my machine. Other people are saything that you have to host your domain with them or user their parked domain feature (what ever that is).

      --
      The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
    5. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by blogeasy · · Score: 1

      It's hard to imagine that a company can charge $34.99 for a domain today when there are so many other companies out there that charge less than $10 per domain. Hopefully, Network Solutions and Register.Com will adapt their prices to compete, otherwise they may continue to lose a lot of market share.

      If you are looking for DNS services, I would recommend using DNS Made Easy for only $4.95 a year. It's the cheapest I've found and they have done a great job for me over the last few years. It's also a good idea to separate your DNS services from your domain registrar in case you transfer your domain to another provider. This makes it real easy to just specify the name server at your new domain registrar and you are all set.

      This could ultimately save you a lot of money in the long run because you only pay $8 per domain and then only $5 to have DNS for up to 5 domains. For 5 domains you would save up to $130 a year.

      --

      Browse the Information Directory
    6. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Can anyone tell me how Go Daddy compares in this area?

      Go Daddy charges $27 a year, making their total price w/DNS -- gasp! -- $35.

      Amazing that they have a rep for being low-cost.

    7. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by jfulcer · · Score: 1

      GoDaddy does let you use DNS without hosting there. I do it for a few of my sites. Like another /.er said, it's a little harder to manage but you *can* do it. I just wish they would allow dynamic DNS updates.

    8. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Go Daddy charges $27 a year, making their total price w/DNS -- gasp! -- $35.

      Maybe for advanced DNS, but they offer basic (A, CNAME, MX) DNS included with domain registration. It's a pain to find, but it's in there (See 'Total DNS Control' link).

    9. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Other people are saything that you have to host your domain with them or user their parked domain feature (what ever that is).

      It's a little tough to understand with their interface. Their DNS servers are called "PARK3.SECURESERVER.NET" and "PARK4.SECURESERVER.NET". In the interface, you have to configure your domain to be "parked" with them in order to use their DNS servers. Once you do that, an option will appear labeled "Total DNS Control" that allows you to change A, MX, and CNAME records. It's very confusing at first (thanks to their retarded interface), but it's all in there for the price of the domain. You DO NOT have to be hosted with them in order to use their DNS.

      PS, namecheap.com offers all the same features PLUS dynamic DNS support (which can automatically update your IP if it changes) included in the price of the domain.

    10. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by Balthisar · · Score: 1

      No, my seven domains all point to my virtual account at bluehost, for example.

      --
      --Jim (me)
    11. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by hendridm · · Score: 2, Informative

      > GoDaddy only provides DNS service if you host with them or you want to use their "parked domain" page.

      Incorrect. You do not need to host with them, but you do need to point to their "parked" servers. However, once you do, you can change A, CNAME, MX records to point wherever you like.

    12. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by onepoint · · Score: 1

      When a problem happens, and it's the registers fault, you can say to the pointy head boss that you signed up with "IBM" of registers.

      back in the 70's there was a running joke: You could not get fired if you bought IBM "

      Onepoint

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    13. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i really don't know how godaddy or register.com at all, I use EasyDNS. They cost a little more but they offer dns services, email aliasing, url redirection, mx services all in their deluxe package which isn't much more. Been using them for almost 3 years now and I haven't had any trouble yet.

    14. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by dhamsaic · · Score: 1

      I'm lost, man. Where are you finding this?

      --
      Every once in a while I like to masturbate a new word into my vocabulary, even if I don't know what it means.
    15. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by birder · · Score: 1

      I went with Joker.com with my latest registrations. $12/year and very flexible with the tools they give you. You can create a joker.com account for free before actually registering anything with them to see what your control panel offers.

      Way better than NetSol who I've used for a few years and paid way too much for what I got.

      While joker.com may not be a saint, I've heard some complaints from people, they seem just fine for me. And I'd rather pay $12 to joker than $8 GoDaddy that has some underhanded practices or $27 to NetSol who just is gouging you.

    16. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Login to godaddy account, manage domains, select the domain you want to work with, look for "total dns control" bottom right corner.

    17. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sign up with freedns.afraid.org if you need a free DNS hosting service. That's what I did wiht my godaddy-registered domain.

    18. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There is something wrong with a country where lying gets Martha Stewart sent to jail and George Bush re-elected.

      Bush stuck to his story. I believe it was someone in the "other" party who kept changing his story constantly. I hate it when people put flames in their sig. It is so pre-teenish.

    19. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1
      I don't want their hosting service i just want them to direct my domain to my machine.

      I've been using granitecanyon for my DNS for years and had absolutely no problems at all. Free is a pretty good price too since you don't need banners or anything ;) The only issue is the turnaround time for the automated system to make DNS changes. No biggie for a home operation though. Link here

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    20. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He stuck to his story, sure. It was just lies. Sticking to a lie does not make it true.

      Just as changing your opinion in the face of new evidence does not make you a bad person.

    21. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by McGiraf · · Score: 1

      They provide DNS too. But their web site is full of ads for other services they sell, it is anoying but for the price difference it's worth it ( i do not do many changes to DNS anyway).

      By the way I recently tranfered a domain form Register.com to GodDaddy, before the tranfser was made i recieve email and a phone call from register.com. they offered me the same price a godaddy to stay there. So if you like there service (which is better than go daddy) but not the price, just start a tranfer and canel it after they offer you a better price :)

    22. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I switched my domain names over to goDaddy recently - it was a PAIN getting them away from Register.com in the first place. But once the were transfered to goDaddy... what an excellant experience! I was setting up DNS one day and something was not propgating correctly, so I decided to call thier support line... no hold music, no elaborate menu system... someone just picked up the phone!! A real person that spoke perfect English!!! He fixed my problem and I was on my way. What an excellent support experiance. I have not had a problem with goDaddy since. There are based in Phoenix, AZ - btw.

    23. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bad news is it seems you have to pay $200 dollars to transfer the domain away from register.com. Does anybody know of a way to get around this 'fee'?

    24. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by hendridm · · Score: 1

      By the way, in order for "Total DNS Control" to show up, you have to have your domain pointed to their "parked" nameservers, which is actually somewhat of a misnomer as you don't have to use their parked page - that's what the "Total DNS Control" option is for. I've said it before and I'll say it again, their interface sucks .

    25. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, but I just don't trust anything purchased for less than $10 as being worth anything. My company brings in thousands of dollars per year (hopefully to be millions in a couple years). The difference between $10 and $35 is completely and utterly insignificant in the overall scheme of things. If it was a personal website I was hosting for fun as a teenager, I might care about that price difference. (Though not likely.)

    26. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the Catholic Church should still be saying the Earth is flat? Interesting view.

    27. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      I have an ignorant question from someone who has never registered a domain before. I thought what you were paying for was for DNS service. You need to pay someone else to actually put it on the DNS server? What do you pay for with a domain "registration"?

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    28. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Registration prevents someone else from taking the same name. It gets pushed up to the root .com/.net/.whatever domain, so when requests come in, that root sends it to the appropriate registrar for more information. This is what the registration does.

      The request is then forwarded to the registrar, who tells the request where to go for the DNS info. This request is then forwarded to the DNS server (often run by the registrar, but can be anywhere) and tells the requester the IP address.

      At that point, the requester gets a 404 File Not Found error or something.

    29. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by neurocutie · · Score: 1
      I thought what you were paying for was for DNS service. You need to pay someone else to actually put it on the DNS server? What do you pay for with a domain "registration"?
      Well it is admitted a bit intertwined, but there are two separate issues in owning an Internet domain:
      1) That you exist -- there is only one of you (your domain),
      2) Who is the authority on your domain -- where can people (hosts) find out about the domain.

      So, registering a domain deals with issue 1, that you exist, and uniquely. This is done by entering information about the domain's existence in the root servers (the top level). However what is entered is just the minimal information about the domain, essentially a pointer to issue 2. You still need an "authority", a place where all the details of the domain, which could be quite sprawling.

      Registering the domain gives you your existence and tells people where to go (DNS servers) to learn about the domain. It is the domain owner's responsibility to provide issue 2. In the early days, (well middle-early days), people all ran their own DNS servers. But now with every Joe owning their own domain, but not doing their own hosting of the domain, you can find DNS services to provide the second part as well. (The third part of course is hosting the actual domain, depending on what the domain is supposed to be).

    30. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      Nice explanation, thanks.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
  13. about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    netsol have been riding us for years. now that we have some competition the market should "improve".

  14. "Controversial" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Anyone who has seen the commercial knows it hasn't anything controversial... what made it "controversial" was the overreaction by the Victorian-Americans (have I just invented that?) and their two sets of moral values (see Iraq media coverage)

  15. Got on-board before the SuperBowl by sremick · · Score: 4, Informative

    I got on-board with GoDaddy before the SuperBowl ad. I had simply heard through the grapevine that they were cheap and offered good service. While I agree that all the hoops and stuff you have to dodge and click "NO" to to just checkout is a tad annoying, the price and service can't be beat. I've been very happy with them and have transferred all my domains there at this point.

    Their other services such as webhosting don't offer anything special, but as a domain-name registrar I think they're great.

    1. Re:Got on-board before the SuperBowl by On+Lawn · · Score: 1


      Funny, we switced a number of our corporate domains before the ad, and I switched my domain afterward.

      In full disclosure I am switching. While Go Daddy offered excellent support, I can't say that has been the case lately. When we transfered the corporate domains away from Go Daddy, they marked that they needed our intervention though they never put the email through. And currently I am in the throws with them about their domain proxy *losing* the emails being sent to corroborate the transfer.

      Then there was a problem with them (as in it worked for 15 months then stopped working) and DNS hosting. On the phone they couldn't explain why it broke, but suggested that upgrading to a hosting service would fix things.

      And though Candice Michelle's silicone makes for a pretty good billboard, it really killed the really cool thing they had going for them -- they were simply the best and people gravitated to them for it. Now that they are relying on cleavage to draw attention instead of their service, they have me worried.

      BTW, I switched to HostSite who is cheaper than Go Daddy and has been very helpful. Theres more than a dozen places out there (that I could find) that were cheaper when I looked.

    2. Re:Got on-board before the SuperBowl by sremick · · Score: 1

      I checked out HostSite per your recommendation (always interested in saving money), but they are $13.95/yr vs. GoDaddy's $8.95/yr. Doesn't seem cheaper to me...?

      Note that I'm just talking about domain-name registrars here, not actual site-hosting with space and all.

    3. Re:Got on-board before the SuperBowl by On+Lawn · · Score: 1


      Add another $8.95 a year for private domain registration and you get $13.95/yr for HostSite vs $17.90 for Go-Daddy. As a private person, the private domain is a must. It keeps me from having to broadcast my home address through the whois database (which I got around by using an old address which forwarded mail before).

      Also HostSite will let you set up DNS through them, though with the many free DNS servers out there is only a convenience rather than a money saver.

    4. Re:Got on-board before the SuperBowl by sremick · · Score: 1

      Ah I see. Well that makes sense then. Wasn't such an issue for me, since I use a dedicated DNS/whois email address and a PO box.

    5. Re:Got on-board before the SuperBowl by On+Lawn · · Score: 1

      I just dug up the JE I wrote on my research at the time. Plenty of cheaper options...

  16. Good to see by Sv-Manowar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's good to see Godaddy doing so well, I just hope they don't forget where they came from. One issue being the ease of which they take domains if you get spam complaints, I've known people who have lost hundreds from suspended domains when a business rival reported them to godaddy

    If they got a bulletproof way of dealing with issues like this, I would definetley consider transferring a lot more of my domains to be managed with them. Congratulations Godaddy.

  17. Tornado? by notherenow · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Man, everybody needs to watch that *.GIF while playing "Dark Side of the Moon" in the background. There's like, a secret message, er, something.

    What does this whirlwind prove anyway? I mean, if there were a fan plugged in somewhere, THAT would be cool.

    --
    We all dance, we all sing.
    -The Streets
    1. Re:Tornado? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that godaddy ad with the whirling what, now?
      Wrong thread, dude

  18. Surpassed, not usurped by ap0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    If GoDaddy usurped NS, they'd control it. They merely surpassed the number of registered domains. Still an accomplishment, but not a usurpment.

    1. Re:Surpassed, not usurped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is an acceptable usage.

      Usurpe: To seize another's place, authority, or possession wrongfully.

      NS was in first place with number of registered domains and now GoDaddy is in their place. This form of usurpe has been used for decades. I haven't been able to speak for more than three decades, so I'm not sure how far back it goes.

    2. Re:Surpassed, not usurped by ap0 · · Score: 1

      It'd be acceptable if they said GoDaddy usurped NS's domain count, or something like that. The way it's written it sounds that GoDaddy just forcefully seized control of NS altogether.

    3. Re:Surpassed, not usurped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Usurp" is a terrible word to use there. It implies that GoDaddy was caught using Network Solutions-type business practices to steal customers from Network Solutions.

    4. Re:Surpassed, not usurped by Peyna · · Score: 1

      GoDaddy usurped NS' position as the top domain registrar. Does that make more sense?

      --
      What?
  19. Opinions and all that... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

    The thing is, though, that I liked the ad. As long as people who agree with me outnumber the people who share your opinion, then they're on the right track.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    1. Re:Opinions and all that... by Veinor · · Score: 1

      You're entitled to your opinion. But my comment also applies to other commercials, whether past, present or future, that might have a significant amount of shock value, i.e. actually showing the breast. Again, I'm not saying that this is a horrible, 'get this off TV RIGHT NOW' commercial, but it is a little upsetting to me. I guess I was being a little overzealous in my first post.

    2. Re:Opinions and all that... by tmbailey123 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would guess you must of been bottle fed 8-) !

    3. Re:Opinions and all that... by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1
      As long as people who agree with me outnumber the people who share your opinion, then they're on the right track.
      Back that one up a bit -- relative percentages have nothing to do with it. What's better from a marketing perspective -- an ad that 50% of your potential audience really likes, and 50% of of them really dislike, or an ad that 100% of your audience likes?

      Not that I'm commenting on the effectiveness of this particular ad.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    4. Re:Opinions and all that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU!!! Your that guy! Ive been looking ALL over for you. You are ruining it for the rest of us. Either get over your red state brainwashing or grow some god damn balls and let the rest of us live in peace. I would love to punch you right in the face. Thank god you are only a vocal minority, or else we would all be puritans again.

    5. Re:Opinions and all that... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "Back that one up a bit -- relative percentages have nothing to do with it. What's better from a marketing perspective -- an ad that 50% of your potential audience really likes, and 50% of of them really dislike, or an ad that 100% of your audience likes?"

      It doesn't really matter what ad they like. All that matters is what ad they remember. When it comes time to register a new domain I am going to check the actual features and objective factors of the hosts I think of, not go with the company whose name I can't remember with a neat ad.

      In many cases people will pay MORE for a product with NO ADDED VALUE if produced by a brand they have heard of. Brand recognition is all. That my friend, is why there is no such thing as bad press.

      The SCO suit was mentioned earlier, but SCO was not even on the radar for most people before that nonsense. The only reason it didn't work for SCO is that they do not have a worthwhile offer compared to others with brand recognition. GoDaddy , on the other hand, had a rock bottom price. They merely needed to get the attention of the target audience to let the audience see that.

    6. Re:Opinions and all that... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Ironically, I (the one who defended the ad) am one of those hated red-staters. You need to update your prejudices.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    7. Re:Opinions and all that... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      What's better from a marketing perspective -- an ad that 50% of your potential audience really likes, and 50% of of them really dislike, or an ad that 100% of your audience likes?

      I'll take "50% really likes" over "100% merely likes" any day of the week.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    8. Re:Opinions and all that... by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1
      Alienating 50% of your potential customers -- especially when you're targeting a fairly small group -- is hardly guaranteed to be a recipe for success. It may work in some cases, but it could backfire just as easily.

      Regardless, that wasn't really my point. Your statement was that they're on the right track if more people like than dislike the ad. How about the scenario when one ad is split 55 "like" / 45 "dislike", and another is split 75 "like" / 25 "indifferent".

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    9. Re:Opinions and all that... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Oh, I know. You just happened to be on the receiving end of me being argumentative today. :-)

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  20. Hats off to them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Can't underestimate their achievement.

    Personally I prefer the "be your own registrar" approach (ala Tucows) and have no problem paying a little extra for the resulting freedom.

    At the end of the day, I'm just glad to see Netsol suffering, they deserve any pain the world can inflict upon them.

  21. All this commotion... by hellfire · · Score: 1

    ...Over a simple wardrobe malfunction.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

  22. Surpasses != Usurps by Kesha · · Score: 3, Informative

    My native tongue is Russian, but even I know that Usurps is not the correct verb to use in that sentence. According to m-w.com, to usurp is "to take possession of without legal claim" - not the same as to surpass a competitor in one away or another.

    Learn your language!
    Paul.

    1. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "offtopic"?

      C'mon mods... Kesha is right. You just got punked out by an ESL student. Every other little nitpicky comment gets by here, why not this one?

    2. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by game+kid · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I too had to RTFS* just to realize that Go Daddy had taken over NS's top spot as opposed to the company itself. With the Bowl ads I thought that they suddenly became a GoLiath (as it were) against Network Solutions.

      These headlines make my head a splode sometimes.

      *" " " summary

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    3. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Paul,
      Has a dictionary ever read you?

      Sincerely
      AC Cliche Whore

    4. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by SysKoll · · Score: 2, Funny
      Hear hear!

      Cmdr Taco, you should learn your own freakin' langwich. Your stumbling babble is a disgrace even to the resilient ears of non-native speakers.

      --

      --
      Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

    5. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go back to russia you commie!

      This is America, we don't need to know what words mean, dammit!

      When I read the headline I was like "wow Usurps, i rarely see that word.. its cool, glad to see it being used!"

      Then you spoiled it

      COMMIE BASTARD!

    6. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by AveryT · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      My native tongue is English, and you should learn to read a dictionary before shooting your mouth off.

      m-w.com gives "to take possession of without legal claim" as the translation of the Latin verb usurpare, not as the definition of the English verb usurp, which it defines as:

      1 a : to seize and hold in possession by force or without right
      b : to take or make use of without right
      2 : to take the place of by or as if by force : SUPPLANT

      Usurp is used perhaps semi-metaphorically but perfectly correctly in this case. Ever hear of "crushing the competition"? That doesn't mean literally crushing it.

      Learn MY language!

    7. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by Kesha · · Score: 1

      I swear I meant to write "way" instead of "away". Ain't it funny - I try to correct someones English and end up making mistakes myself. Oh well, it was good for a laugh.

      Paul.

    8. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by ultramk · · Score: 1

      Well, I can understand your confusion from reading the m-w definition, but your conclusion is a false one.

      "Usurp" (in colloquial English) is sometimes used as a colorful synonym for "supplant", especially when the one being replaced is viewed as being part of the status quo. It's often used humorously, to imply that the new "leader" doesn't actually deserve their newfound position. In this case, the implication seems to be that gaining fame and success by using 'controversial' advertisements is an invalid tactic.

      English is a subtle, complex language, and many verbs have layers of meaning.

      reference:

      http://www.answers.com/usurp&r=67

      "To seize another's place, authority, or possession wrongfully."

      Don't worry, some of us have "learned our language." :-)

      m-

      --
      You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
    9. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by Kesha · · Score: 1

      You may be technically correct, but if you consider that a language is primarily a means of communication of information, "to surpass" fulfills this role much better than "to usurp" - there is no second guessing involved.

      Concise and unambiguous communication method is the superior communication method for technical/business information. Save the metaphors for poems and fancy novels.

      Paul.

    10. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the apostrophe in "someone's."

      Sorry, couldn't resist. ;D

    11. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by ajs · · Score: 1

      What's more, the word is very often used in sports, when refering to titles and standings. Given the topic is a comapny that made it big partially as a result of a suberbowl add, this seems apropos.

    12. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by Kesha · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your non-hostile attitude while putting me back in my place. I've seen a similar argument from AveryT below, you can read my reply to him if you care.

      Paul.

    13. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "usurps" is completely clear, understandable, and proper usage in the context it was being used for. I think you put too much faith in your knowledge of English.

    14. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by Kesha · · Score: 1

      My limited knowledge of English usually allows me communication while avoiding ambiguities such as the one being discussed here. As evidenced by the score of my post, a lot of people are either unaware that "to usurp" may be used to mean "to surpass", or agree with me that "to surpass" would have been a better verb to use in this case.

      Paul.

    15. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by CoderBob · · Score: 1

      I don't know about his faith in his knowledge of English, but idiom and non-common use are difficult for a non-native speaker to pick up on. The fact that he bothered to look it up speaks more for him than your response.

      I do, however, have great faith in you being an asshat.

    16. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by ultramk · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, it wasn't my intention to "put you in your place." Personally, I'm happy that there are people who care about what words mean, and when they are being used correctly.

      As for your other comment, while I appreciate the difficulties that can arise when unfamiliar terms or phrases are used, I respectfully disagree that colorless, bland clarity and concision should be the ultimate goal of all communication.

      If metaphor and colorful language were eliminated from daily usage altogether (with the exception of "poetry and romance novels", as I believe you put it), life, IMO, would be much more boring. :-)

      To quote Mark Twain: "Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it."

      -m

      --
      You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
    17. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What's more, the word is very often used in sports, when refering to titles and standings. Given the topic is a comapny that made it big partially as a result of a suberbowl add, this seems apropos.

      The phrase "as of late" is often used in sports, when refering to recent trends. That doesn't make it right.
    18. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by ultramk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not to belabor a point, but a high incidence of lingual ignorance on this site is hardly surprising to anyone who has been paying attention.

      In other words, a lot of the geeks here have no English skills, whatsoever. It's not surprising they agree with you. (No offense intended.)

      m-

      --
      You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
    19. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      Ignore him, he's making up stuff to defend the misuse of the word, you were correct.

    20. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by Durindana · · Score: 1
      screw Merriam-Webster: if you want to know about etymology, there's no excuse not to consult the Oxford English Dictionary.

      usurp, v.

      I. 1. trans. To appropriate wrongfully to oneself (a right, prerogative, etc.). {dag}Also const. against, upon.

      b. esp. To intrude forcibly, illegally, or without just cause into (some dignified or important office, position, etc.); to assume or arrogate to oneself (political power, rule, authority, etc.) by force; to claim unjustly.

      2. To seize or obtain possession of (territory, land, etc.) in an unjust or illegal manner; to assume unjust rule, dominion, or authority over, to appropriate wrongfully. Also const. on, upon (= against), over.

      b. transf. To occupy or take the place of, physically; to encroach or trench upon.

      c. Of feelings, passions, etc.: To take possession of, occupy, or assume predominance in (the mind, bosom, etc.).

      d. to usurp the place of, in fig. uses.

      {dag}3. To take or hold possession of (something belonging to another or others) by sleight or force; to appropriate by ruse or violence; to steal.

      4. To make use of (something not properly belonging to one or one's estate); to use or employ wrongfully.

      b. To assume or claim (a name or title) unduly as one's own; to arrogate or take to oneself. Also simply, to assume, bear.

      c. To take (a word or words) into use; to borrow or appropriate from another language, source, etc.; to employ, use.

      {dag}5. To exercise, practise, or inflict (injury, cruelty, etc.); to put into act, impose. Occas. const. on, towards. Also transf. Obs. rare.

      6. To supplant, oust, or turn out (a person); {dag}to deprive (one) of possessions. Also refl. rare.


      y'all detecting a pattern here? Me too; 'usurp' carries definite connotations of illicit assumption, skullduggery, wrongfulness, none of which is implied by a more neutral verb like 'supplant' or 'overtake' or 'outcompete', each of which would have been more appropriate.

      From a native English speaker with too many degrees in language, communications and law, go Russian guy!
    21. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not ambiguous. It would be just as ambiguous if it said "surpasses" instead of "usurps" if you had no other clue what they were talking about.

      Just becuase a few people moderate you up does not indicate some sort of consensus. It means a few people (and literally, it just takes one person per score increment) thought your post would be a good use of moderator points, not that they necessarily agreed with you either.

    22. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by ajs · · Score: 1

      "The phrase "as of late" is often used in sports, when refering to recent trends. That doesn't make it right."

      There's no "right" when it comes to language. There's different people's opinions and then there are different group's opinions.

      Quick quiz: which is right about English, the US, Australia or the UK? What about north-eastern US vs south-eastern US? At what point does "incorrect usage" become a dialect? Is it based on number of speakers? If so, how many? 10? 1,000? 10,000? 100,000?

      How long does a phrase like "as of late" have to be used before it is correct? Certainly "as it were" was not always correct... at some point it became an accepted phrase, but that was a gradual process, and there was no defining moment when "English changed". Before that the correct phrase would have been "an it were", and now that usage of "were" is archaic... but "as it were" is still acceptable usage.

      People tend to point to reference works, but reference works change and adapt to usage, so they FOLLOW the trends of common usage, not define them.

      Stop trying to pretend that there's one English langauge, and just cope with the concepts of common usage and dialect. It's much easier that way.

    23. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by fritter · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, native English speaking editor corrected by you!

    24. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usurp has a high negative connotation quotient. Using it in an entirely legal business vs business context is less than optimal.

    25. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by bugnuts · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "usurps" is completely clear, understandable, and proper usage in the context it was being used for.

      "usurps" is incorrect, and the original poster is correct.

      Go Daddy did not take over Netsol. It took over Netsol's position in the market which is an important distinction. What if the title was Go Daddy Absorbs Netsol? That's just as ambiguous.

      What the title was missing is an object. Go Daddy Usurps position of top registrar from Netsol would've been correct. Go Daddy Usurps Netsol's Stranglehold is also correct (and possibly more descriptive :-)

      You can argue that it was implied and I'll accept that. You can even say that headlines are funny, because they are often intentionally skewed to be ambiguous. But basically the Ruski was right -- the headline was ambiguous and "usurps" was misused.

    26. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, the Russian is right. Usurp is an incorrect use. You would only be right if Go Daddy had taken a position of power that Network Solutions previously had, such as Dictator. Market share shifts don't count.

    27. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by NedS · · Score: 1
      Certainly "as it were" was not always correct [...] now that usage of "were" is archaic
      This is just the subjunctive mood; it's certainly in contemporary use.
    28. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by AveryT · · Score: 1

      Guys, chill out, will ya? Civilization will survive the use of a metaphor in a headline.

      I'm a language purist and the first one to have a conniption when I see sloppy, imprecise, or redundant use of English: could care less, platform-agnostic, comprised of, one year anniversary.

      The use of usurp in this context, while technically incorrect as several people have pointed out, just doesn't offend me in the same way as some of the more egregious offenses noted above. I think we can allow a little creative latitude for non-literal or metaphorical interpretation here. There are many other words in a similar vein that could just as easily have been used -- oust, supplant, unseat, dethrone -- and I don't think anyone would have blinked.

      Besides, usurp, in its literal sense, isn't a word that comes up a whole lot in polite conversation these days. Its use in this instance, whether you think it is correct or not, sparked a debate and got a whole bunch of people to look it up in the dictionary. That, in my opinion, is not a bad thing.

    29. Re:Surpasses != Usurps by ajs · · Score: 1

      "as it were"

      This is just the subjunctive mood; it's certainly in contemporary use.


      You're correct, it's a shortened form of "as if it were so", which is really what I meant. The word "were" is being used in a way that is archaic: implying the subjunctive without any helper to indicate such, which we almost always use in modern English. You would not expect, "the way we were" to mean, "the way we might have been," but "the way we used to be."

      So, while you are correct, you're also missing a larger point: the usage of "were" in that sentence is archaic, and yet the phrase is acceptable. At one point in the past, we started saying "as it were" instead of "an it were", and that was incorrect for some period of time too.

      Language changes usually start with the least educated. They have fewer pre-conceptions, so they refine their usage based on the culture they find themselves in, the ease of use of certain constructs and influences from other languages. Of course, because these changes come from the least educated parts of society, we who have been taught that there is a "right way" to speak, resist them until their usage becomes so common that we can no longer pretend that they are not part of our language.

      Thus, it's rather silly to say that common usage is wrong... common usage IS our langauge, and anything else is just the trappings of elitism.

  23. I hated the ads - but signed up anyway by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I gave GoDaddy a try after reading some slashdot posters sing the praises. Since my own domain name was going to expire in a month anyway, I thought I'd look into them.

    For $9, I'm pretty damn impressed. Network Solutions gave me eternal run around when there was problems. When I moved and tried to change my DNS information a few years back, it was this horrific experience that gave me a bad taste in my mouth. Dealing with them on other issues such as when a former employer of mine bought a domain name from another party was just a nightmare.

    Godaddy doesn't have the prettiest interface, but damn if it doesn't work. I signed in, it told me what I needed to give them, kept me updated on the progress transferring from Network Solutions, and when it was over someone gave me a phone call. The last time I tried to call Network Solutions for anything I felt like taking a bath afterwards. Sure, the guy wanted to ask me about hosting, but he basically said "Mr. Hummel, everything's done, need anything else? Great, call if you need something." Not pushy at all.

    I have another domain name, and I know I'm going to use Godaddy. The price is nice, and I may even give their hosting services a try based on how well this experience has gone so far.

    Now - one note on the ads. Stop it. I hate them, and almost didn't sign up just because the ad made me feel dumber after seeing them. Hell, change the name - Godaddy sounds more like a porn service than a domain name system.

    Service: good. Support: Excellent. Name and marketing: Butt ugly awful.

    Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong.

    1. Re:I hated the ads - but signed up anyway by nb+caffeine · · Score: 1

      As i posted elsewhere, my expirence with godaddy and their customer suppor was excellent. Im glad that i (finally) found a registrar and hosting company that doesnt, um, suck. Godaddy has my buisness, and i continue to refer friends who need cheap domain registration and hosting to them. Hey, a good company who treats their customers right deserves it.

      --

      "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
    2. Re:I hated the ads - but signed up anyway by BaudKarma · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, someone I worked with mentioned GoDaddy as a good place to register domain names cheap, and danged if two months later, I wasn't able to recall them pretty much effortlessly. I've been with GD for two years, never had a problem. I pay $3.95 a month for hosting, which gets me a web page I never use and 150 email forwarding accounts. $3.95 for no spam ever is pretty darn cheap.

      I thought the Super Bowl commercial was pretty cheesy myself, but they seem to have gotten a bunch of publicity out of it. I guess it was money well spent.

      --
      It's the land of the brave, and the home of the free
      Where the less you know, the better off you'll be.
    3. Re:I hated the ads - but signed up anyway by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      Not only does sex sell, it's often more memorable. If they'd chosen something like gohost.com it probably wouldn't be as memorable since people seem to unconsiously put more effort into remembering sex-related things.

    4. Re:I hated the ads - but signed up anyway by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      I'm not switching from Speakeasy, but that is the *best* ad ever.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    5. Re:I hated the ads - but signed up anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, change the name - Godaddy sounds more like a porn service than a domain name system.

      Try GoMommy.com (It's not a porn site :)

    6. Re:I hated the ads - but signed up anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being a fan of their domain name service, I tried their hosting service for a while. I gave up on it after about two months because the DSN for my backend database kept being dropped for reasons they couldn't ever figure out. They were apologetic and didn't give me any hassle when I left. I switched to Alentus and have not had any problems since.

    7. Re:I hated the ads - but signed up anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Go Daddy" is sex-related?

    8. Re:I hated the ads - but signed up anyway by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      The Super Bowl commercials were. The name is for quite a few people. Some women, even adult ones, call the guy they're having sex with "Daddy."

    9. Re:I hated the ads - but signed up anyway by IronChef · · Score: 1

      Does Go Daddy give you free DNS with your registration? Last time I looked (3 yrs?) I couldn't figure it out from the marketing materials and tech support was no help either.

      Me: "My web server is at www.xxx.yyy.zzz, can I enter that into GoDaddy's control panel once I sign up so my site works?"
      GoDaddy: "Chewbacca!"
      Me: "That doesn't make sense."

      Currently I use Gandi.net ($15/yr) because of 1) inertia, they USED to be a great deal and 2) they host DNS too for no extra fee, and I can even edit the raw DNS data.

      However, I would drop them in a hot capitalist second for a cheaper option. Their site is also a mess, and they are overseas which will make tech support a pain if I ever need it.

      Yes, I know about Granite Canyon for free DNS, but their site is a pain in the ass, and I am lazy--I want it these services to be under one login with a pretty GUI.

      (Side rant: My pet peeve are friends & family who know I have a web server, so they go register a domain name at some PAIN IN THE ASS but CHEAP registrar and then expect me to get it all working for them.)

    10. Re:I hated the ads - but signed up anyway by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      My brother and I, a few days after the superbowl, compared notes to the reaction where each of us were to the GoDaddy ads. In both cases, a roomful of people were mystified, scandalized, amused, and completely unaware what godaddy was. The guesses were like you describe (porn, some new reality show, competition for Desperate Housewives, etc). In both cases, we sat quietly and waited until someone (one person out of 20, at each party) remembered who/what GoDaddy was and explained to the room.

      Yup, ugly and awful. But did I mention that the party I was at was Ad execs and business owners hosted by a small TV station's marketing director? And that those 20 people *now* have a name when they go to register their next domain name? The ad wonks in the room remarked that 'who the hell is _____?' was a priceless bonus to the effectiveness of those ads.

      So... ugly, but damn effective for creating name recognition in an area nobody gives a crap about.

      Oh, and over the last 2 years I've consolidated as domains lapsed: GoDaddy has all my domains. Cheap and decent is all I need.

    11. Re:I hated the ads - but signed up anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good question - I'll have to figure that out, because I'd like to host my own box out of the house again without paying SBC to screw up the DNS.

      So, my answer is "I don't know, but I'll look."

    12. Re:I hated the ads - but signed up anyway by hendridm · · Score: 1
      Does Go Daddy give you free DNS with your registration?

      Yes it does. However, it's somewhat difficult to find in their interface. You have to set the domain to use their "parked" DNS servers. Once you do, you will be provided with a menu option titled "Total DNS Control". In there, you can configure A, CNAME, and MX records.

      Currently I use Gandi.net ($15/yr) because...

      GANDI is probably the only registrar that has a crappier control panel than Go Daddy.

      My pet peeve are friends & family who know I have a web server, so they go register a domain name at some PAIN IN THE ASS but CHEAP registrar and then expect me to get it all working for them.

      I feel for ya' man. But GOOD doesn't necessarily have to be CHEAP in the domain registration world. Even 1and1.com gives you a single A and MX record for $5.99/year (yes, their customer service sucks). However, for $8.88/domain/year, I'd recommend Namecheap.com. It's cheap, it's reliable, they offer full DNS control, they have WHOIS privacy for only $2.88/year (compared to $9/year at GoDaddy), and they even have DDNS support (nice when hosting on a cable modem or DSL). Plus, they're an eNom registrar, so if you ever decide they're not cutting it it's pretty easy to transfer away...

    13. Re:I hated the ads - but signed up anyway by IronChef · · Score: 1

      Schweet, thanks! I'll check out Namecheap, and now if someone screws me with a GoDaddy domain I know how to do DNS. :)

  24. GoDaddy is great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...once you get past their toilet of a user interface and crappy DNS management screen. And $9/year for WHOIS privacy is a little silly when other registrars offer it for a couple bucks.

  25. Insanity by scribblej · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Check out this disclaimer on TiVo's page. I can't believe we've come to this. Litigious bastards.


    his release contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate to, among other things, TiVo's business, services, business development, strategy, customers or other factors that may affect future earnings or financial results. Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as, "believe," "expect," "may," "will," "intend," "estimate," "continue," or similar expressions or the negative of those terms or expressions. Such statements involve risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to vary materially from those expressed in or indicated by the forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially include delays in development, competitive service offerings and lack of market acceptance, as well as the "Factors That May Affect Future Operating Results." More information on potential factors that could affect the Company's financial results is included from time to time in the Company's public reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004, and the Quarterly Reports on Form 10Q for the period(s) ended April 30, 2004, July 31, 2004, October 31, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We caution you not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect an analysis only and speak only as of the date hereof. TiVo disclaims any obligation to update these forward-looking statements.

  26. Go Daddy to Network Solutions... by zepmaid · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who's your daddy??

    1. Re:Go Daddy to Network Solutions... by thelibrarian · · Score: 1

      Crighton: Tell him who his daddy is D'Argo

      D'Argo: I'M your daddy!

    2. Re:Go Daddy to Network Solutions... by KillShill · · Score: 1

      the contributor of my y chromosome

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
  27. Sweet by m4sk0t+ · · Score: 1

    I just registered a new domain there this morning... Maybe I helped push them over the top. I've been using GoDaddy for several years now. Yes the advertisments while trying to check out are annoying, but their management interface is nice and I can always get someone on the phone there pretty quickly, and that is what matters to me.

  28. Doubts about GoDaddy. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 3, Informative


    How does Powweb compare for hosting?

    GoDaddy is extremely aggressive about pushing things people don't need, in my opinion. The company seems to me to take advantage of people with less technical understanding by exploiting their doubt. For example, there are sometimes as many as 30 ads on a GoDaddy screen at one time, so many it is difficult to navigate.

    1. Re:Doubts about GoDaddy. by nb+caffeine · · Score: 1

      Not sure. There was a lot more companies around selling "cheap" domains when i registered mine back in 02, since then ive rarely touched their website (except to get the link to my mysql database manager). Their site seemed less cluttered back in the day. In my expirence, ive never said i am an IT manager, i have a degree in CS, anything that would set me off as non-techie to their customer support people. Ive never had them try to push anything on me. But then again, this is just one piece of evidence, theres millions of others im sure.

      ill be sure to check out powweb out in the near future. If they support a larger feature set than godaddy, and good customer support i might send referrals that way. Thanks for the link.

      --

      "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
    2. Re:Doubts about GoDaddy. by Balthisar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, I *do* know what I'm doing, but have to read all the damn ads anyway to make sure they're not trying to sneak something by me.

      In any case, I'm a "small" user; they manage my 7 domains for me for a fair and reasonable price, and their controls are simple, and I have no complaints about the service per se.

      --
      --Jim (me)
    3. Re:Doubts about GoDaddy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've personally been with Poweweb for over 3-4 years now. Their prices are good, their service is amazing. They seem to always be up-to-date, and while they do modify the terms, it's always been in the favor of their clients (more GB per month, more daily GB, more storage, etc).

      In fact I've had someone switch to Powweb too, and he hasn't complained once (or didn't tell me about it, which I'm sure he would have, being my suggestion and all).

    4. Re:Doubts about GoDaddy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, what happened to the www.godaddysux.com website? Also, goDaddy owns godaddysucks.com!

    5. Re:Doubts about GoDaddy. by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      GoDaddy is extremely aggressive about pushing things people don't need, in my opinion... For example, there are sometimes as many as 30 ads on a GoDaddy screen at one time, so many it is difficult to navigate.

      I agree. It wasn't like that in the beginning, but last time I went to register a domain name I was blown away by all the excessive "suggestive selling." I've even written their customer service that they need to get that under control because it does make their site less user-friendly.

      I'm not to the point of transferring all my domains away from Godaddy yet, but if I were a new user I would probably abandon the registration process due to the excessive ads long before I got to the point where I enter my credit card information.

    6. Re:Doubts about GoDaddy. by will592 · · Score: 1

      I'll also chime in with a positive for Powweb. I host 5 domains through powweb (in combination with zoneedit) and have been nothing but pleased. The best part, in my opinion, about them is that they are so easy going about letting users install software on their own. They don't provide mambo (a cms) but you can find instructions in their forums for installing it yourself. While they don't offer shell access (not many do anymore at this price point) they don't seem to have a problem with people using php shell-emulation type scripts to manage their sites. Give them a test drive; I don't think you'll be unhappy. Also, you can search the web for promo codes; there are almost always viable codes that allow you to get additional discounts when you sign up.

    7. Re:Doubts about GoDaddy. by fz00 · · Score: 1

      I'm a big fan of powweb. I use them to host mine and my clients' websites. You can't beat 2gig, free mysql, and php for $7 a month. I just registered a couple of domains with godaddy recently but found the value was better with powweb's hosting.

  29. Go eNom or Go Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GoDaddy offers DNS, but it has a horrible management interface that you have to dig for. Namecheap.com offers the same, has a nicer interface, easier to get to DNS management screen, and offers WHOIS privacy for $2.88/year instead of GoDaddy's $9/year (which adds up if you have several domains).

  30. Re:boobies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    -1 flamebait

    we've got women read slashdot too!

  31. Obligatory by LukaFox · · Score: 1

    Netcraft confirms it!

  32. Only Godaddy could top NSI by mabu · · Score: 1

    in terms of being sleazy and disreputable enough to garner more business.

    Dotster is THE registrar of choice if you ask me, and they use a lot of open source software for their system. We routinely have huge problems wrestling domains from Godaddy or diagnosing problems with their system and management. Dotster has proven to be more reliable and more ethical in their operation. I've been with them for probably five years at least and am very happy. I have tons of horror stories about Godaddy. They totally suck, but this goes to show that people still seem to think you can get more than you pay for.

    1. Re:Only Godaddy could top NSI by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Dotster is evil. They took like two extra months to release my domain after I failed to renew it. I ended up filing one of those domain-sniping actions with godaddy to get it back. Dotster can kiss my ass. Also, their interface is confusing (in a different way from godaddy's, which is covered in upsell adverts, admittedly) and I didn't care for it at all. So far, I far prefer godaddy to dotster.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Only Godaddy could top NSI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dotster is a rolling pile of manure out of the rear of a space yak and you are the brainless maggot on the manure for using them.

    3. Re:Only Godaddy could top NSI by tetranz · · Score: 1

      I have nothing particularly against Dotster but last time I looked, Dotster and MyDomain.com looked suspiciously like the same system behind the scenes except that all the extras that Dotster charge for are free at MyDomain.

      I don't use them these days but MyDomain.com generously do a pretty good free DNS and email forwarding service for any domain. It doesn't even need to be registered with them.

      By incredible coincidence: Dotster and MyDomain have the same phone and fax numbers and adjacent PO Boxes.

    4. Re:Only Godaddy could top NSI by spinfire · · Score: 1

      I switched from Dotster to Godaddy after Dotster a) Started spamming me regularly, without a working opt-out b) Registered .info versions of my domains "for free" and stuck their advertisement ridden parking stuff on them.

      I don't care if Dotster uses open source software. Domain squatting and spamming make them unacceptable. I can no longer recommend them.

    5. Re:Only Godaddy could top NSI by mabu · · Score: 1

      I switched from Dotster to Godaddy after Dotster a) Started spamming me regularly, without a working opt-out b) Registered .info versions of my domains "for free" and stuck their advertisement ridden parking stuff on them.

      I never had any of that happen to me. You may be thinking of some other registrar. In fact, Dotster has a very strict anti-spam policy.

      If you guys think Godaddy is better than Dotster, well... I manage over 2000 domains and have worked with almost every major registrar and help customers wrestle control of domains on almost a daily basis and I can say unequivocably that Godaddy sucks - they are the ones who have a history of hijacking domains.. search for stories about "web bots" and framed redirects and nightmare stories of their customers. In fact, when a customer comes to me for hosting and he's previously dealt with Godaddy for domain registration, it's like a litmus test for trouble (as well as them being difficult to work with and clueless).

    6. Re:Only Godaddy could top NSI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dotster is a rolling pile of manure out of the rear of a space yak and you are the brainless maggot on the manure for using them.

      It's funny that a statement so juvenile could be so close to the truth...

  33. I hope that we will see... by CodeMonkey4Hire · · Score: 1

    ...more ads like that in next year's Super Bowl.

    --

    Let's go Hurricanes!!! 2006 Stanley Cup Champions!!!
  34. That's just boilerplate by charnov · · Score: 1

    Ok...I'll bite at an offtopic. That is almost word-for-word boilerplate that is required on any statement from any publicly held company when it could affect the price of stock through speculation. I think that wording has been around since the late '30s. To not have it would violate SEC rules and federal law.

    --
    [RIAA] says its concern is artists. That's true, in just the sense that a cattle rancher is concerned about its cattle.
    1. Re:That's just boilerplate by scribblej · · Score: 1

      I guess I'm naieve then.

      I think that's sad. Makes me think of instructions on a package of toothpicks.

  35. Godaddy's ad here by imuffin · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can watch Godaddy's Super Bowl Spot here along with all the other superbowl spots on my site which strives to shamelessly rip-off what AdCritic was before they started charging.

    Go ahead and slashdot it. I've got like 100 gigs of bandwidth to use before the end of the month.

    1. Re:Godaddy's ad here by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      I've got like 100 gigs of bandwidth to use before the end of the month.

      Did you really... No, he didn't - did he? OK, then. Can you the distant thunder of a herd of clicking Slashbots? Got a fire extinguisher in the server room?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:Godaddy's ad here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you put some porn up there then.

    3. Re:Godaddy's ad here by shadow303 · · Score: 1

      If we use all 100 gigs by the end of the month, will you swim to Norway?

      --
      I've got a mind like a steel trap - it's got an animal's foot stuck in it.
  36. What makes them good? by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

    Right now I use Dotster for my domain, it's around twice what GoDaddy charges, but other than price, why should I switch?

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    1. Re:What makes them good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a new cable company started in your town offering identical service to what you have at half the price, would you ask for additional reasons to switch?

    2. Re:What makes them good? by pbur · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was going to transfer away, but Dotster contacted me and changed the price for domain registrations and renewals for my account to the GoDaddy price for here on out. So they certainly kept my business. Dotster is a fantastic registrar.

      Now, I may take GoDaddy up for a SSL Cert though. $40 ain't bad.

    3. Re:What makes them good? by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      There is a saying which goes something like "You get what you pay for." If I buy cheap service from GoDaddy, I want to know if I get cheap service, or something better.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    4. Re:What makes them good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There is a saying which goes something like "You get what you pay for." If I buy cheap service from GoDaddy, I want to know if I get cheap service, or something better.

      I think in the case of GoDaddy you do indeed get what you pay for. Try namecheap.com.

  37. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but its controversial Super Bowl ads no doubt helped put Go Daddy over the top.

    Reply to this thread if you picked your registrar on the basis of a Super Bowl ad. I want to know who you are so I can avoid your car on the motorway.

    1. Re:Hmm by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      I picked GoDaddy about 3 weeks before the superbowl ad.

      If I would have seen the ad I probably would have _not_ chosen them.

      Though for the small website I want to run, php, 1 mysql database, $40 some dollar including domain name, a year is hard to beat.

    2. Re:Hmm by aok · · Score: 1

      You disagreed with the ad THAT much?

  38. Email hosting by PhoenxHwk · · Score: 1

    I use GoDaddy for domain and email hosting. I have to say, their service is great and the price is just right.

    1. Re:Email hosting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      agreed - rather than spawn another thread, I'll just reply here.

      I switched from netsol after using them for 5 years, and I was very - VERY - impressed with the service. While netsol made the transfer a pain in the ass, go Daddy went the extra mile with multiple call backs from the same agent, follow-up emails within the hour, etc, all for 8 bucks. The transfer cost came with a free year vs netsol's nickel and dime gouging.

      Last phone conversation netsol attempted to justify the costs with speal about security and other fear-mongering nonsense. Not one credible argument against Go Daddy.

      If there's any bias, me being in Phoenix would be the extent of it. The Arizona market has plenty of scheister-companies due to lax laws and an enforcement. Go Daddy is certainly not one of them. Refreshing to see a local concern blow by the competition.

  39. How can you call it a troll? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 0, Troll

    MOD PARENT UP. Moderators, how can you call it a troll? It's someone's opinion, including mine.

    1. Re:How can you call it a troll? by winkydink · · Score: 1

      Maybe because everybody else is talking about the Super Bowl Ad and you and the GP poster are talking about their homepage?

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    2. Re:How can you call it a troll? by Whafro · · Score: 1

      I was talking about the ad I see on television all the time, and haven't even visited their homepage in months.

  40. Re:creators usurping unprecedented evile as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Paul, you forgot to take your medicine again, didn't you?

  41. The commercial's humor... by Crash+Culligan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When it comes down to it, all humor is codified ridicule. The reason the commercial is funny is not because they had a proto-Hooters girl gyrating around (though it was fun to laugh at the apparent airhead too), but you got to laugh at the reactions of the old men on the "committee," not one of whom looked to be under 100, and one of whom was so shocked -- Shocked! -- that he needed an oxygen mask.

    The commercial was not simply a jab at the "wardrobe malfunction as art," but also a not-so-subtle poke at the people who made it such a big deal of them.

    For that reason alone, I'm thinking GoDaddy should get more of my business. The commercial stood well on its own, not necessarily for the product but as an attention-getter. The viral marketing campaign around it was just gilding.

    --
    You cannot truly appreciate Dilbert until you read it in the original Klingon.
  42. Zonedaddy! by mathmatt · · Score: 1

    use zoneedit for all of your (free) dns needs. Then find free webhosting from a place like funpic (no ads and only limit is ind. file size = 1MB) and you've got a hosted website for $8.95/yr.

    1. Re:Zonedaddy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      use zoneedit [zoneedit.com] for all of your (free) dns needs.

      ZoneEdit has a decent interface, but only the first 5 zones are free. Once you use a zone, you cannot reclaim it. For example, over time since signing up for an account, I added and removed domains thinking I could always have up to 5 free. Not so, eventually I hit the 5-domain limit because I had added more than 5 over time, even though I was only sitting with 3 at the moment. Upon relogging onto the interface, I was locked out because I was at -1 zones and required to purchase more. I could not make changed to any of my existing zones until I purchased another zone. I e-mail support about this and said I did not want to purchase any new zones and that I just wanted to manage my existing ones and they said there was nothing they could do. I had to purchase another zone to be allowed back into my other zones.

      I call that hijacking. I quickly switched my zones to my registrar's DNS. It wouldn't have been so bad if this was spelled out or made obvious, but it wasn't. And there was no warning when I added the zone that dipped me below the limit. So by one false click I was required to pay them money to get control of my zones back.

  43. NSol is also LOSING domains the fastest by Saeger · · Score: 4, Informative
    A few more interesting points of interest:
    • Fastest Gaining Registrars: GoDaddy (+278,692 domains in the last 4 weeks), with eNom in a distant 2nd place (at +73,744/month)
    • Fastest Losing Registrars: Network Solutions (-14,382), followed closely by that other ripoff registrar, Register.com (-10,293)
    • Does anyone really think the "NetSol" brand counts for that much of premium? Register.com certainly never did, but they didn't count on the people they were marketing to getting a cluestick.
    --
    Power to the Peaceful
    1. Re:NSol is also LOSING domains the fastest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting point of interest? Mod you redundant :)

  44. Horrible experience transferring out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I used GoDaddy to host a domain name a while back before they got too big, from word of mouth.

    However, I realized that I liked the features and price of someone else better. So, I tried to transfer my name from GD.

    Worst transfer experience ever - and I've done many.
    Took multiple phone calls, reattempts, emails, etc just to get the name released. One time, the rep didn't even realize one could transfer out or why one would want to.

    1. Re:Horrible experience transferring out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the technology inept, transferring from any registrar to another is difficult. Go Daddy is particularly easy to transfer away from.

      Let's just say I have a reason for knowing these facts *wink*

  45. Funny not Informative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sometimes I wonder what the mods are up to when I see that. And... uh... to be on topic -- I liked the ad.

  46. Looks on-topic to me by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
    The fact is that many of us who've been in the business for a few years hate Network Solutions (I've explained it in more detail during other discussions). Seeing them fall from the top seat is excellent news and someone we wish would have happened a long time ago.

    MetalliQaZ was right: competition is good. I mean, if Network Solutions is this universally despised today, imagine how much we all liked them years ago when they were the only game in town.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  47. The ad is nothing compared to Southpark by Emperor+Shaddam+IV · · Score: 1

    They said "Shit" more than 100 times on Southpark last night. It didn't offend me, but I'm sure that had to offend more people than the GoDaddy.com ad!

  48. That 1984 ad by fm6 · · Score: 1
    Apple Computer demonstrated the power of a Super Bowl ad with its 1984 ad.
    What crap. Geeks love to tell each other that the 1984 ad was really cool. But to most people who see it, it's just about the stupidest commercial they've ever seen. No product identification, and the story it tells is lame and patronizing, worthy of Harlan Ellison on one of his bad days.
    1. Re:That 1984 ad by BananaJr6000 · · Score: 1

      You are still talking about it in 2005 - I'd say that makes it pretty successful regardless of its content. Plop plop, fizz fizz anyone? -- ^Z

    2. Re:That 1984 ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were still talking about Natzi death camps too...

      Ooops!

    3. Re:That 1984 ad by fm6 · · Score: 1

      You'd have a point if the ad were remembered for anything in the ad. But it doesn't even have a decent mindworm effect. We're only still talking about it because geeks are so absurdly infatuated with it. "Yeah! The Mac is the enemy of Big Brother! Right on!"

    4. Re:That 1984 ad by loqi · · Score: 1

      So, we're not still talking about the ad about because of what was in the ad, we're talking about the ad because of what was in the ad?

      --
      If other reasons we do lack, we swear no one will die when we attack
    5. Re:That 1984 ad by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the only reason we're still talking about the ad is neither of us has the strength of character to walk away from an inane conversation.

  49. mmm, adcritic by jbellis · · Score: 1

    add rating and browse-by-top-rated and I'm all over your site.

    1. Re:mmm, adcritic by imuffin · · Score: 1

      I'm working on it :)

  50. Marketing 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Breasts in Super Bowl ad.
    2. ???
    3. Profit!

  51. Usurpe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Usurpe? Isn't that the flavored ice thing you get at the 7-11?

  52. Price by ArchAngel21x · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone pay over $30 for a domain? What does Network Solutions do to justify the price?

    1. Re:Price by birder · · Score: 1

      When they were the only one (or the biggest one I forget if anyone had a choice circa '99) you had no choice. I mean $35 to have a computer easily accessible to anyone in the world is a pretty good deal really. $100 could be a good deal when there's no other option =p

      Fortunately, market competition has made these prices lower. I think NetSol can keep their price at $35 because so many people just renewel when the notices come, and they still have mind share (need to register a domain = Network Solutions). Plus they make it a hassle to switch.

      Also they only need to sell about 1/4 the number to make the same money as GoDaddy so maybe they're still making good profit. If you lower your price then you need to compete on other services to win people over that may not want to move.

  53. i disagree..... by chadm1967 · · Score: 0

    i disagree that it was the super bowl ads that put godaddy over the top. i think the price difference was the greatest reason. sure, the super bowl ads may have brought people to the site to see the ad again but it was the price difference that kept them there and then, ultimately, register a domain.

  54. it's the price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not the super bowl ads. It's the price, and the service. You can call them and get someone on the line in minutes... even at 4am. They are helpful and know what they are talking about. My friend just bought a .com with a year of web hosting (which includes email) and private registration, and it cost him $51. That's a pretty good deal.

  55. Can we please banish this phrase forever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we please banish the phrase "vote with your wallet" to the pits of hell? There is no such thing. Buying is not voting. Consumerism is not democracy. The thing that is most profitable is not necessarily that which does the greatest good or serves the largest number of people--witness the profitability of Viagra vs. vaccines. In a democracy, the person who rides the bus to work gets as many votes as the person who owns the company that builds the buses. In a consumerocracy, the latter rules everything. Another word for consumerocracy is PLUTOCRACY. Don't vote with your wallet, vote with your vote! Buying is not voting, buying is not voting, buying is not voting.

    Sorry to be shrill... I just really hate that phrase.

    1. Re:Can we please banish this phrase forever? by homerules · · Score: 0

      Here at slahdot, we vote with modpoints, troll.

    2. Re:Can we please banish this phrase forever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here at slahdot, we vote with modpoints, troll.

      Off-topic, definitely, but not a troll.

  56. You shouldn't. by Some+Random+Username · · Score: 1

    The only thing GoDaddy offers is price. They are dishonest, and jerk you around when you try to transfer a domain from them to someone with good service. What it comes down to is wether good service is worth an extra $5-10 a year to you.

  57. back in the good old days... by CaptTripz · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or was the internet a better place when it took smarts, and (a little bit more) money to register a domain. When I registered my first domain many years ago (10+), it wasn't too expensive, but you had to find someone who would add you to 2 dns servers. And then you had to know what to do with it.

    I was special. I had my own domain. I knew how it worked.

    Now who doesn't have a handful of them. Don't get me wrong, I like (and use) godaddy nowadays...just thinking back...guess I'm just an elitist snob. Damn AOL...why did you have to open the internet to all those people.

    1. Re:back in the good old days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, you are an elitist snob.

      <sarcasm>omg, you learned how DNS worked?! you must be a genius!</sarcasm>

      guess what dipshit, it's not very complicated. if something that trivial could make you proud of yourself you're a complete dumbass.

      YOU ARE NOT NOW, NOR NEVER WERE, SPECIAL!

  58. Economy Plan by Viking+Coder · · Score: 1

    Am I reading their Economny Web Hosting Plan correctly - that I get 100 email accounts with 10 MB of space each, in addition to the 500 MB of disk space I get for the web site, for a total of $3.16/mo if I buy 12 Months? That's not right, is it? What am I missing?

    And why do I get only 50 forwarding email accounts? Seems odd that I can forward fewer email addresses than they'll host. Am I just reading this whole thing wrong?

    Is the second year more expensive, or is that the price?

    And finally a question that really proves how much of an idiot I am... I want to make web pages and images that are username/password protected. I'd like to have about 50 users have access to my website - friends of mine. Is there a simple way to do something like that for an entire website?

    --
    Education is the silver bullet.
    1. Re:Economy Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .htaccess with user/pass's

    2. Re:Economy Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh and he'll know waht you mean by that....

    3. Re:Economy Plan by jm92956n · · Score: 1
      I registered my domain with GoDaddy (see sig) and I use their economy plan (except I'm paying month to month, so it's $3.95 per month). Thus far I've been extremely pleased with the service I've received.

      Each account supports PHP and they provide 1 MySQL database (1 doesn't sound like a lot, but you can have unlimited tables, so it's plenty). You can use the combo to set up a "member" area. There's a ton of scripts on the web for a PHP/MySQL user authentication system, in case you can't or don't want to code.

      --
      An effective signature identifies a particular user amongst a base of thousands.
  59. Re:Chicks on slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After seeing you they lose interest in all men.

    (From a woman)

  60. Price Match -- by naught · · Score: 5, Informative

    NetSol will price match on request. It's not something they advertise, but they'll do it. I found this out when transferring my domains away.

    FYI.

    --
    -- build a man a fire and he'll be warm all day. set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Price Match -- by hendridm · · Score: 1

      I just e-mailed them and asked if they would price match other registrars. I told them I was interested in transferring several domains. Their response:

      We have received and reviewed your e-mail. Although we don't give out special prices for domain registrations, you may try sending an e-mail to vip@networksolutions.com if you are planning to register more than 5 domain names with us.
  61. I just moved from netsol/register.com by doormat · · Score: 1

    to go daddy last month without a problem. I had to turn off their anti-hijacking feature in three places but thats it. Plus, I was sick of paying $35/yr per domain. Go daddy is a little harder to use (trying to figure out how to use their DNS servers could have been a little easier). I signed up with netsol back in the day because they had coupons and deals, 50%, etc, which made it $17.50/yr, but I havent seen any deals in the past 18 months so I decided to switch to go daddy and go with the cheaper domain registrar.

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
  62. I just moved last month by doormat · · Score: 1

    I did the exact same thing last month. I moved my two domain names from register to go daddy.

    GoDaddy has DNS, you have to use their parked servers, and then edit the domain and go to the "Total DNS Control" applet.

    Make sure at register you turn off anti-hijacking features for all of your domains, and additionally, each individual domain.

    It should take about a week to transfer the names over (5 business days).

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
  63. Brilliant advertising by Wrexs0ul · · Score: 2, Funny

    Much like all the great ads, they take a commonly held belief and associate it with their product, ad is as follows:

    Boobies = Good

    Boobies, boobies, boobies, Go Daddy, boobies, old guy, boobies

    Go Daddy = Boobies = Good

    Possibly old guy = good too, not sure about that?

    -Matt

    --
    --- Need web hosting?
  64. What about GKG by Puppet+Master · · Score: 1
    GKG is the registrar I use... Their prices match (or sometimes even beat) GoDaddy's and their control panel is a hell of a lot better to use than GoDaddy's...

    I've never liked GoDaddy's control panel, too cumbersome, but GKG's is nice and easy to use.

    According to their site, they've been in business 13 years. Oh and it looks like they just added .us domains too! Cool!!! Time to transfer my final .us domains from GoDaddy to GKG.

    --
    The day Microsoft creates a product that doesn't suck, it will be known as the Microsoft Vaccuum Cleaner!
  65. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com vs. Enom.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    enom.com is better. They have DDNS.

  66. Moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Huh? How does it speak more than my response? Becuase I actually am a writer and publisher and know a thing or two about proper usage? Becuase it doesn't agree with the dissent?

  67. GO daddy has faulty forwarding by goombah99 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I used to be a go daddy customer but quit for some good reasons. The problems I had were the following:
    1) incorrect forwarding of subdirectory links:

    example: if you set up a name forwarding of say

    mydomainname.com --> myhostname.com

    then if you try to access any sub_directory
    mydomainname.com/CGI/somthing.jsp
    it fails to forward it!!!!!

    That's right! you CANNOT access any subdirectory whatsoever. the only file you can access is index.html in the top level.

    Here's what those dumbshits did. when you set up name forwarding they register your name with a go-daddy IP

    mydomainname.com --> go-daddy_server.com/mydomainname

    then when you try to access the your URL with a subdirectory rather than parsing the request it tries to go to the subdirectory on the go_daddy_server which of course does not exist and the user gets a 404 from go-daddy_server.
    What idiots. I now use Name_zero.com as my registrar which correctly forwards.

    2) to manipulate your account you have to use a web browser and their admin portal. Yet their portal does not render correctly in all browsers making it impossible to use most browasers on a macintosh.

    3) their tech support is unresponsive. they take days to respond, they respond with boiler plate answers that make no sense and cant deal with real issues like #1 because they are just an answering machine not actual adminsitrators or deisgners.

    BAsically go daddy sucks unless all you want is your name registers to your own host and not say name forwarding.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  68. I'd still be using them... by jasonditz · · Score: 1

    If they'd set up their paypal payment system so you don't have to have credit cards on file.

  69. Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In case you didn't get the drift by reading the definitions, they all imply wrongdoing.

    Surpassing one in standings is definitely not a place you'd correctly use this word.

  70. usurp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    usurp (y-sûrp, -zûrp)
    v. usurped, usurping, usurps
    v. tr.

    1. To seize and hold (the power or rights of another, for example) by force and without legal authority. See Synonyms at appropriate.
    2. To take over or occupy without right: usurp a neighbor's land.

    v. intr.

    To seize another's place, authority, or possession wrongfully.

    1. Re:usurp? by archipunk · · Score: 1
      Surpass is probably the word that the submitter had in mind.

      'Surpass' surpasses 'usurp' in appropriateness for the headline, but 'usurp' usurped its place.

  71. I disagree with this usage. by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

    I think many people take liberal advantage of English's flexibility and really bend the language to make use of words that don't really fit.

    Usurp doesn't really work in this sentence, as has been pointed out by numerous people. Had the word fit perfectly, nobody would have mentioned anything about it.

    It doesn't work. Only those who believe that they can use artistic liberty to butcher the language believe that this fits.

    I'm just glad I'm not the only reasonable person who has pointed this out.

    1. Re:I disagree with this usage. by ultramk · · Score: 1

      I fundamentally disagree with you here.

      Just because some people have an imperfect understanding of the word (imagine, on slashdot of all places), does not mean that the rest of us should be limited by their ignorance or misapprehension.

      In other words, "numerous people" are wrong. What else is new? ("Numerous people" also believe in an invisible man in the sky who will punish us if we do the wrong thing. That doesn't mean it's true.)

      m-

      --
      You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
    2. Re:I disagree with this usage. by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

      Just because some people have an imperfect understanding of the word (imagine, on slashdot of all places), does not mean that the rest of us should be limited by their ignorance or misapprehension.

      The problem is that it is mostly the people who think they have a good vocabulary who misuse words. They remind me of Damon Wayans' character on In Living Color.

      Also, keep in mind what the headline said. Most people who agreed with the usage stated that "Go daddy usurped Network Solutions' position" is an acceptable usage. This is NOT what the headline said. The headline said "GoDaddy usurps Network Solutions". These two sentences have completely different meanings. The first means that GoDaddy took Network Solutions' position, while the second means that GoDaddy took Network Solutions.

  72. How many are spamvertized? by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    The company-turned-spammers I worked for last year would happily plop down $$ to register 1500 domains at a time.

    "Who has registered the most domains" is a completely worthless statistic especially considering how easy it is to do. It's a tax write-off for spammers.

    Ah, a random spam references "indilatory.com" "provengoods.net" and "epispastic.com" - all domains registered for the sole purpose of spamming & "CAN-SPAM" compliance.

    That's why I think it's a pretty useless figure.

    1. Re:How many are spamvertized? by Autonomous+Cow · · Score: 1

      If a domain registered at GoDaddy is sending you spam, tell GoDaddy about it. Sending spam from a domain registered at GoDaddy is in violation of their terms of service, and can get the domain shut down.

      --
      The Autonomous Cow. Moo.
    2. Re:How many are spamvertized? by EvilStein · · Score: 1

      And they might actually do something about it after a few weeks.

      Been there, done that.. most of the registrars are the same in that regards. They *might* kill a spamvertized domain, but it often takes way too long.

  73. Register vs GoDaddy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having a couple of names registered with register.com, I decided to try GoDaddy.
    They where cheap enough.
    They dont mention that you dont get DNS with their service. So I try to configure my domain and guess what?, it's all screwed up. Oh it worked for a couple of days, then stopped dead. Wierd since I changed nothing.

    So after sending them support emails, and calling customer support, and getting NOT A SINGLE REPLY in over a week, I decided, 'screw you', and transfered it to register.com. Only then did they answer me, and only to ask why I transfered away.
    BTW in 5 minutes afte the transer was complete I had the domain configured with register, and 24 hours later after the DNS ripple, it all worked fine first time.

    I will never use GoDaddy again. The differenrtce is only $25, which is about 1/2 hour of my time.
    Register.com may not be the cheapest, but their stuff always works.

    GoDaddy gets your $$$ then forgets about you. Unless they can get more $$$ out of you.
    I will never use them again.

    1. Re:Register vs GoDaddy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I will never use GoDaddy again. The differenrtce is only $25, which is about 1/2 hour of my time. Register.com may not be the cheapest, but their stuff always works.

      Hah hah! To say Register.com is better at anything is quite amusing. Yeah, they're probably better than GoDaddy but that's not saying much. Ever heard of namecheap.com, active-domain.com, or Dotster? Hell, even Yahoo domains is better than both of them.

  74. Lay off the pot. by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

    #1- Put down the pipe

    #2- there's no secret message.

    #3- you're not even responding to the right thread. This is about GoDaddy.

    1. Re:Lay off the pot. by notherenow · · Score: 0
      well.... it WOULD have been funny.

      Thanks for the heads-up.

      --
      We all dance, we all sing.
      -The Streets
  75. I would never register my domain at godaddy.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I have a domain (say xyz.com) that I registered thru godaddy.com, and I want to throw it away. I thought at that time, I'll just let the domain expire, instead of cancelling the domain right away.

    Last year in August suddenly I found a charge in my credit card that I rarely use. The charge was from godaddy.com to renew this domain.
    So I called godaddy.com to dispute this charge, and I complained because:
    1. I never consent to auto-renew this domain. The fact of the matter, I already had this domain before godaddy implemented their auto-renew program.
    2. Since the expiration date of the credit card that godaddy charged was already expired (in their records, since I never updated that information), I argued that they just can't charge my credit card like that, because that constitutes fraud.

    So, the lady that answered my call, asked me "so what is right expiration date of the credit card that we charged?" I said same month but next year. And I found a few minutes later the thing that she did was to update their record of my CC with the expiration date that I said.

    Well, even though the charge that godaddy made to my credit card was relatively small, but I'm just upset with the way of their customer service that tricked the customer into giving the right information to avoid being chargeback by me.

    Ever since this incident, I have moved all of my domain names that I had before thru godaddy.com to gkg.net, and for all of my new domain name needs, I don't use anything but gkg.net. I found gkg.net is much more trusthworthy compared to godaddy.com.

    1. Re:I would never register my domain at godaddy.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tricked? You're a moron.

  76. Re:Go Daddy vs Register.com vs. Enom.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agreed. As for price, you can get the same great features as eNom with a lower price by going to one of their resellers, like RegisterFly.com, Namecheap.com, Active-Domain.com, etc.

  77. Where did the "Go Daddy" name come from? by TAZ6416 · · Score: 1

    Seems like a funny name for an domain registration company unless I'm missing a pun somewhere?

    Jonathan

    http://www.wychwood.co.uk/

  78. Re:GO daddy has faulty forwarding by ixtapolapoquetl · · Score: 1

    I don't know about the forwarding service, but I have to say that the tech support so far has actually been very responsive for me.

    Emails have taken less than an hour for responses for me, and if you call their phone support, the wait time has always been less than 10 minutes.

    I also like how they say how long the phone wait will be on their website.

  79. Re:boobies! - Offtopic? I think not! by JPamplin · · Score: 1

    Based on their entire ad campaign, which is "promenently displayed" on their website and their ads, I'd say that breasts are entirely ON-topic.

    A poor-taste, stereotypical ad, no doubt, but look at their target market. Gen-X, mostly male, web-savvy enough to have their own domain, etc. How do you sell to this segment? Sex, of course.

    They ain't going after retirees with this one.

    JP

  80. Reminds me of an old joke by kokoloko · · Score: 1

    Q. A man has to choose between two domain registries. One has low prices, the other has great customer service. Which one does he choose?


    A. The one with the biggest tits.

  81. Re:GO daddy has faulty forwarding by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    Yeah I tried one of those cut rate DNS services too. I like to run my own DNS down here and didn't want to mess with their web pages at all. I never could get them to set my IP as the authoritative server for the domain in question. They just couldn't figure out how to do that, and I spent 3 weeks talking them about it. I registered a different domain with Network Solutions and everything was working the way it was supposed to within a matter of hours.

    I ended up writing a nasty letter to the cut-rate joint and CCing the Icann accreditation board. The cut-rate guys (to their credit) gave me a refund and I've been a loyal Network Solutions customer since then.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  82. Netsol is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yepp.... so ridiculously priced, that they'll probably go out of business laughing all the way .

  83. Not only that, GoDaddy is white hat. by merc · · Score: 1

    Yes, yes, yes, I know, I know, they constantly have their share of customers that spam, provide spam support, etc. The fact is though, that GoDaddy, despite *few* problems--in my opinion has been exceptional about terminating their spamming parasites. Especially considering the vast number of domains they provide registration support for.

    GoDaddy also has a REALLY good repoitiore with their customers, of which I'm happy to have been one in the past (although I use OpenSRS now. [actually I originally registered my domain in 1988 via NIC.DDN.MIL, but that's another subject]).

    I hope GoDaddy wins over all the rest of Notworking Solutions' customers. :D

    --
    It's true no man is an island, but if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie 'em together, they make a good raft.
    1. Re:Not only that, GoDaddy is white hat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GoDaddy also has a REALLY good repoitiore with their customers . . .

      Repoitiore? I think you were searching for "rapport". HTH.

  84. Candice Michelle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Go Daddy spokesbabe's name is Candice Michelle. She looks even better naked. Schwing! Just do a google image search (safe search off) and you'll find her. They should be called SpankDaddy.com.

    1. Re:Candice Michelle by boy_afraid · · Score: 0

      Be careful when you do a Google Image search while at work! OOOPS!

  85. I'm Not Surprised -- Fradulant Spam from GD by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    I'm not surprised -- not surprised at all because I've been getting fradulant spam from them claiming that they've received a request to transfer my domain to them and just click here to confirm.

    Of course, I've made no such request and will never use or recommend them for anything after this little episode!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  86. Phase 2 has been revealed! by ShagratTheTitleless · · Score: 0
    Phase 1. 8.95$

    Phase 2. Fake Tits

    Phase 3. Profit!!!

    --
    Sometimes at night I imagine the darkness is filled with horrible things with too many teeth, like Julia Roberts.
  87. Better Pictures of the Artist.... by gpmac · · Score: 1

    For those so inclined. Found these as I went searching for the commercial.
    http://pictureshq.net/candice_michelle

    This was linked from here:
    http://wizbangblog.com/archives/005007.php

  88. This is huge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh my goodness! GoDaddy has forcably taken control of Network Solutions without legal authority? This is big news!! I can't remember another instance in history of a large corporation doing such a thing.
    Has the FBI been alerted? Or maybe the Department or Homeland Security?
    Oh wait... so now you're saying they didn't usurp them? They only passed them in sales?

    Never mind.

  89. Re:GO daddy has faulty forwarding by jrauch · · Score: 1

    I have to agree with the grand-parent, the forwarding does not work correctly and although the help desk at godaddy is fine, they can't (or won't) fix this issue. I've asked. But, they are cheap and they have a great ad ;-)

  90. the Go Daddy Girl by Anonymouse+Cownerd · · Score: 1

    has in fact been in nudie films! oh the horror! http://www.fleshbot.com/sex/straight/photo/more-ca ndice-michelle-032570.php

    --
    http://www.rayn.net . Funny. Stuff.
  91. GoDaddy using Windows and .NET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is great to see Slashdot readers accepting GoDaddy the way you are (reading your posts).

    Noting that GoDaddy run their web site on Windows, and most new stuff coming out seems to be running on ASP.NET; it is really good that Slashdot readers are big enough to just go ahead and use their service anyway.

    Disclaimer: I do work for a GoDaddy competitor that uses lots of Linux and Java, so my views might be biased ;-)

  92. Re:GO daddy has faulty forwarding by Acoustic · · Score: 1

    I have had similar problems with GoDaddy hosting. As far as a registrar, they seem to be fine in my experience. However, they somehow seem to mess up their hosting sever configurations, and when you bring it to their attention, instead of fixing it, they write it off as an "unsupported" feature.

    Take, for example, using mod_rewrite. I discovered that on their servers you cannot rewrite anything with a .php extension. (You can go to a php extension but not from) When I contacted tech support, they claim that "we do not support mod_rewrite with php files."

    This also screws up 404 pages. If you request a non-existant php file, instead of the 404 page you should get, you recieve a nice "No input file specified" error. This comes from the php parser when you execute it without a filename. After bringing that to their attention, they came back with "It's not our problem, fix your script so it doesn't reference a non-existant file" However, my scripts are fine, and that is completely missing the point. If someone bookmarks a file and later you move it. The user should be able to hit that bookmark and get a 404 page for your site, redirecting them. Of course after responding with that, they ignored my message and I have not gotten a reply.

    Anyway, stay away from godaddy unless you want to just serve static html files. I wish they would spend less time writing blogs producing "radio shows" and just focus on getting their core business to work properly. I recently just switched to 1and1.com and they seem to be much better so far. After using 1and1's admin interface, it completely blows away the meager interface godaddy has.

  93. Screw GoDaddy, check out DomainSite. by SMS_Design · · Score: 1

    I've been to GoDaddy, and I refuse to do business with someone who will pimp my eyespace out like that. Instead, I did a little looking and I found DomainSite. Check it out, it's $6.99 for the first year, and $7.99 after that. Fully featured, price beats GoDaddy, does fast domain propegation, really simple control panel.. And check this out.. I had a problem, called them, and I got a real human being! He was even helpful!

  94. Godaddy Upsells! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    GoDaddy is an agressive temp worker hirer here in the Phoenix/Scottsdale, Az area. The temp agencies tend to lie quite a bit about what the job is really like. I've known alot of people who have worked there; and usually for only short periods of time.

    The job description says "customer service" or "Technical support" but its entirely to upsell, upsell, sell, and badger the customers until they buy something they may not need.

    Now of course as a long time user of Godaddy I am happy with the service they provide. You just gotta get past the advertisements and upselling you get bombarded with in the process. I am sure glad I diddnt end up working with them; I'd feel really evil.

  95. Re:GO daddy has faulty forwarding by hawk · · Score: 1

    I've gotten quick response from their tech support every time.

    Of course, every single response has been, "we don't support that" :)

    (usually assorted mod_rewrite features and php functions).

    hawk

  96. Same comment with fixed formatting by m101 · · Score: 1

    ** Sorry replying to myself to fix bad formatting (first time ever I choose not to click preview *sigh*) ***

    Actually there is quite a bit of publicly available information about GoDaddy's financial position. Various snippets from their blog:

    - Go Daddy has been cash flow positive and profitable since October 2001.

    - Go Daddy has no debt and no equipment leases. Except for the monthly rent we pay for our buildings (which we made the decision to lease), the company has no debt service or lease payments

    - Our sales this year were over $100 million. If we do nothing different (other than continue to promote our business the way we have been) our sales for 2005 should be about $170 million

    - All of the products we sell are developed by us. We currently employ over 30 development teams, and spend well over $3 million a month in new product development

    - we sell a new domain name at the rate of one every 7 seconds More here: http://www.bobparsons.com/index3.html

    True, their domain sales are a major part of their service however their value added services - as pushed (far too much so in my opinion) at the checkout are another stream.

  97. Disregard parent: misinformation. by Autonomous+Cow · · Score: 1

    GoDaddy is not sending you spam. They are simply following the rules for domain name transfers. See http://www.icann.org/transfers/ for details.

    The word you tried to spell is "fraudulent", meaning deceitful. The email did not deceive you; someone really was trying to take your domain name.

    Go now and tell your registrar to lock your domain names to prevent transfers. If your registrar makes that difficult, maybe you should switch to GoDaddy.

    --
    The Autonomous Cow. Moo.