Slashdot Mirror


Don't Click on the Blue E

honestpuck writes "With an increasing number of people disenchanted with the flaws, bugs and security holes in the world's most popular web browser (still) switching to the current open source champion, Firefox, it would seem timely to release a volume titled Don't Click on the Blue E. The number of books on Firefox is increasing by leaps and bounds - so far I've read three, fortunately all have their place. Don't Click on the Blue E is O'Reilly's latest entry into the market. It is targeted at the absolute beginner. I found it to have the usual O'Reilly quality: well-written, well-edited and well-designed." Read on for the rest of Williams' review. Don't Click on the Blue E author Scott Granneman pages 254 publisher O'Reilly rating 7 reviewer Tony Williams ISBN 0596009399 summary Good guide to Firefox for beginners with some minor flaws

That said, it is not without flaws. I hate most of the first chapter and see it as a waste of space. 35 pages mainly of history (some of the Net, and some of browsers) is almost self-indulgent. Certainly almost all buyers would not miss the information if it was reduced to two or three pages in the introduction or first chapter. There is some useful reasoning to justify the shift from Internet Explorer to Firefox at the end, but the rest needs a good going over with the red pencil.

I also found that for a book titled Don't Click on the Blue E, there was not enough information of the "in IE you did it this way, and in Firefox you do it this way" type. The book is a good entry-level guide to Firefox but I would have hoped for more guidance for people switching from IE to Firefox.

I'm getting a little ahead of myself. First, it has to be said that O'Reilly have done away with their usual cover and given us a bright orange cover with a graphic of a fox about to bite a familiar icon composed of a blue 'e.' I like it, this is definitely an O'Reilly book targeted outside their usual technically savvy market and deserves a different cover style.

The book feels light, despite the 250 pages, and is split into only five chapters and two appendices. As you can imagine, each chapter is a huge chunk of information, but the light writing style combined with a look that is heavy on illustrations and sidebars make it an easy read. Once again, this is a departure from O'Reilly's usual style but well suited to the likely reader. I also thought that they had used a lower grade paper than usual, probably to keep the retail cost down. As this is not a reference book to be kept for years, I didn't see this as a flaw.

I've already mentioned the first chapter; the second is devoted to installing and configuring Firefox. This is full of useful information and good illustrations to explain how to set up the browser in detail. The third chapter is how to use and manage it, covering topics such as the toolbars, the search box and adding engines, the menus, tabbed browsing and pop up blocking. The fourth deals with the add ons - plugins, themes and extensions. The final chapter is a bit of a grab bag. Titled "Advanced Firefox," it covers such topics as Live Bookmarks and searching in pages. Each chapter has a well-researched and useful "Where to Learn More" section pointing to web sites with tools and information.

This is probably not a book for the average Slashdot reader. You may like to buy a copy so you can lend it to Uncle Bob or Aunt Susan after you spend another wasted afternoon cleaning the viruses and spyware out of their PC, but I doubt you'll want a copy for yourself. Taken as a whole this is a well-written, thorough book for the absolute beginner with one or two minor flaws. Despite the book's flaws I still find myself recommending it. If you would like a better look yourself, O'Reilly have their usual page of contents and two excerpts from the book.

I would recommend this book over Firefox and Thunderbird Garage for more serious readers. Garage has an occasional quirky tone that might annoy some -- for others it might be a benefit to learning. It also has a little more detail in some areas. Of course if you want a book that covers both applications, then Garage is the only book I've found. Don't Click on the Blue e is a good volume for a beginner who doesn't need the coverage of both Firefox and Thunderbird of the "Garage" book and would like a little more detail.

You can purchase Don't Click on the Blue e from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

196 of 313 comments (clear)

  1. I for one do not welcome our advertising overlords by XorNand · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This is probably not a book for the average Slashdot reader.
    Sooo.. what's this doing on the front page then? Ahhhh... I see:
    You can purchase Don't Click on the Blue e from bn.com [htp://service.bfast.com/bfast/click?bfmid=2181&so urceid=39391960&isbn=0596009399]
    I dunno about the rest of you, but I don't go spending $20 buying 250-page, semi-technical books to toss at friends and family. I simply install Firefox and spend 5-minutes explaining why they should use it. Anyone "in the know" doesn't need this book and the people who should read it don't wander into that section of the bookstore. So again... what's the point?
    --
    Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
  2. The Blue what? by SIGALRM · · Score: 4, Funny
    t would seem timely to release a volume titled Don't Click on the Blue E
    I too avoid the "Blue E", but what's with the Firefox logo? Is that Papa Smurf's head? A salamander feeding off a giant blueberry? Flipped upside-down it sorta looks like a redhead getting choked.

    And what's that silly fox gumming, Lithuania?
    --
    Sigs cause cancer.
    1. Re:The Blue what? by Winterblink · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's 69ing the world, can't you tell? It's basically an artist's representation of the give-take relationship that is the basis of the internet. This ying-yang philosophy is clearly shown, as while the silly fox slurps up Lithuanians, it firmly nestles Toronto in its crotch. It's art!

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    2. Re:The Blue what? by notnAP · · Score: 1

      This ying-yang philosophy is clearly shown

      Firefox and the world in a perfectly symbiotic, harmonious relationship. Firefox helps the world, and the world helps Firefox.

      Actually, this sounds more and more like Microsoft's corporate game plan.

    3. Re:The Blue what? by infochuck · · Score: 1

      Yeah, FF has a crappy logo. No telling what it is. That's why I use the IE 'E' for my FF icon.

      It has the added benefit of confusing people when it doesn't do what they expect.

    4. Re:The Blue what? by alzh · · Score: 2, Funny

      Obl. bash.org quote:

      <Kupo> man
      <Kupo> Firefox can fuck itself
      <DarknessTear> It can? So THAT's what the Firefox logo is doing.

      --
      The truth can't hurt you, it's just like the dark: it scares you witless but in time you see things clear and stark - EC
  3. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by SolusSD · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well even though (most) slashdot readers are beyond this book, we all have family members and friends that could use a little direction. think of this post like one of those "advice to parents" articles in your local newspaper. ;)

  4. Friends don't let friends.... by mcsporran · · Score: 2, Funny

    Click on the Blue E.

    --
    This is NOT a signature.
    1. Re:Friends don't let friends.... by Donut2099 · · Score: 2, Funny

      its hard to install firefox on windows without clicking on the blue e

    2. Re:Friends don't let friends.... by tehshen · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    3. Re:Friends don't let friends.... by damiangerous · · Score: 1

      Not at all. Windows still has command line ftp and Firefox can be found at: ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/

    4. Re:Friends don't let friends.... by MynockGuano · · Score: 1
      ftp ftp.mozilla.org
    5. Re:Friends don't let friends.... by JWW · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, its easy.

      Step 1, put in Linux install disk...

    6. Re:Friends don't let friends.... by mbsurf · · Score: 1

      Kiff! We have a conundrum!

    7. Re:Friends don't let friends.... by llamaluvr · · Score: 1

      It must've been REALLY fun investing that computer with spyware :-).

      --
      Insightful: 76, Off-Topic: 379, Flamebait: 24, Funny: 152, Interesting: 201, Underrated: 55, Troll: 9, Total: 896
  5. So that's what they name it now by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Clicking the Blue E.

    one small click for a man, one giant step back in the war on drugs.

  6. e What? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Good thing eBay uses a red "e".

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  7. faking users out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am and IT director at an ISP and when we build new laptops or desktops we deploy FireFox with the Blue E icon instead of the Firefox Icon. We even go so far as to make to the default page msn.c0m. They usually never notice.... :)

    1. Re:faking users out by DaHat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Out of curiosity... what do you do in the off chance that a user complains that the internet isn't working right... like a website requiring ActiveX or claiming that their browser is not compatible?

    2. Re:faking users out by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I simply tell people the site is poorly programmed and (if it requires ActiveX) has no consideration for your security.

      Look, Firefox has about 8%-9% of the browswer market now. In *any other business*, if you said you would deliberately design a store that would prevent 8%-9% of your potential customers from coming in, you would be fired on the spot for negligence.

    3. Re:faking users out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      No, Firefox has been downloaded a number of times equal to 8-9% of the browsing population. That's wildly different than saying 8-9% of people on the internet browse exclusively with Firefox and have no access to any other tool.

      There is an extra cost associated with standards compliance, as opposed to "MS standards compliance". That cost varies wildly depending on the site, of course, but it's non-trivial for most businesses (even if it's simply because most "web developers" are from the MS school and those that know how to build to standards are more rare). If you went to your boss and told him you spent twice your budget to allow 8-9% of your customer base to access your site a tiny bit more conveniently you'd be the one fired on the spot. Remember, the people who have no access to IE at all is much, much smaller than than the people who simply prefer to use Firefox. Most people who use Firefox, when confronted with a site that doesn't work, simply shrug and maybe get mildly annoyed (though they expect it) and open IE. There's even a Firefox extension for that purpose.

      Standards compliance is a good thing, but the business case doesn't always justify it. I've been there.

    4. Re:faking users out by IANAAC · · Score: 5, Insightful
      when we build new laptops or desktops we deploy FireFox with the Blue E icon instead of the Firefox Icon.

      Every time I read one of these "I'm protecting the user by not telling them" posts I can't help but think you're doing a disservice to them, your business and the mozilla team.

      My ISP, for example, makes sure on their pages that they prefer Firefox and encourage you to download it. Don't you think that's the more honest way to do things?

      If I were a customer and found out you "tricked" me, as it were, you'd lose a customer.

    5. Re:faking users out by leonardluen · · Score: 1

      No, Firefox has been downloaded a number of times equal to 8-9% of the browsing population. That's wildly different than saying 8-9% of people on the internet browse exclusively with Firefox and have no access to any other tool.

      indeed i downloaded firefox one time, burned it onto a cd and then installed it on my computer and 5 other computers of friends and family.

      number of dl's means nothing, but actual usage could just as easily be higher than the number of dl's than lower.

    6. Re:faking users out by jayhawk88 · · Score: 1

      number of dl's means nothing, but actual usage could just as easily be higher than the number of dl's than lower.

      But it's not. Look, that 50 million or whatever number is through how many versions? And how many of us have downloaded each version as it's come out?

      I love Firefox and I think it will continue to succeed, but reality check here folks. Inroads have been made, but it's still an IE world for the most part.

    7. Re:faking users out by sapgau · · Score: 1

      But you can PLAN before building your website to include Firefox, Safari, Opera, et.al. by forcing your design to comply to standards FIRST and then accomodate for incompatibilities after that.

      I will be very skeptical if I hear that a particular activeX component is absolutely essential for a website to work.

    8. Re:faking users out by jd · · Score: 1
      For most users, you could probably make the default page whitehouse.com and they'd never notice.


      I'm not sure that faking is really the best policy, though - too close to the whole "security through obscurity" mindset. On the other hand, users HAVE come to associate the blue E with the Internet.


      I remember a flamewar on Usenet, where half of those involved insisted that they were on the web and therefore HTML was valid in posts. The other half wanted to roast them over a fire, partly for the ignorance and partly because even when informed of the reality, the users persisted in their delusion.


      Unfortunately, the implication of this is that sometimes you HAVE to fake users, in order for them to do anything, simply because they'll put their own interpretations first, no matter what. (Flat Earth, meet the 21st century.)


      This is one reason I'd like to see GUIs migrate away from the application view and towards the pipelining view, where you establish how streams are linked rather than "running" anything and then loading the data in. The application view is just a legacy of the old batch systems from the 1960s. The "standard" utilities in Unix dispensed with such a view and have outlasted virtually all contemporary application-centered software, but writers never really learned from this.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    9. Re:faking users out by bjhonermann · · Score: 1

      I would like to point out that this is a clear instance of trademark infringement. Please send me your ISP's contact information so that I may inform the BSA and Microsoft of your illegal activities. Thank you.

    10. Re:faking users out by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't deceive anyone. If I got a non-tech user to switch, I'd just tell them that the Firefox icon was the new, improved way to get on the Internet, and the Blue E was old, clunky, and obsolete.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    11. Re:faking users out by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1

      I agree, but sadly I've heard now of too many sob stories of those "in the know" with computers who have to work for the biggest idiots in the world - i.e. "we" know that changing the Windows XP destop look from "blue bubbly" back to "classic view" has absolutely nothing to do with getting a virus, but "the boss" thinks that's really the reason why the entire computer system got a virus the last time.

      NOTE: I thankfully don't work for anyone nearly as stupid, but I know people who have. Therefore, the parent poster is probably just your average BOFH trying to make a living in less than optimal circumstances, and KNOWS that trying to explain the details about why they're deploying Firefox instead of IE would only confuse "the bosses" and most likely get them in trouble for doing the right thing to try and protect the company from more computer problems. So yes, communication and information in any successful company are key, but sadly not all companies are that successful.

    12. Re:faking users out by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      If I were a customer and found out you "tricked" me, as it were, you'd lose a customer.

      I would guess that most users, especially the clueless ones, would prefer to be tricked into using a different browser than tricked by using IE and getting loaded with adware, spyware, and viruses.

    13. Re:faking users out by majest!k · · Score: 1

      I am and IT director at an ISP and when we build new laptops or desktops we deploy FireFox with the Blue E icon instead of the Firefox Icon. We even go so far as to make to the default page msn.c0m. They usually never notice.... :)

      Why would an ISP be building laptops/desktops? Why would you discredit the Mozilla dev team by masking Firefox (which you apparently aren't able to capitalize correctly)? Why would you avoid using IE yet continue supporting MS (via ad-revenue) by using msn.com as a start page?

      And how does someone with grammar as bad as yours become an IT Director?

      Moron.

      --
      smattawichu
    14. Re:faking users out by pebs · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call it "tricked".. more like "guided". And I think its quite justified consider the habits of users.

      What I tend to do is relabel the Firefox icon as "Internet." I used to use the IE icon and label it "Internet" and point it to Mozilla (pre-Firefox days), but I stopped doing that because I'd rather not teach people that they should be clicking on that. And of course remove all occurances of the IE icon from desktop, program menu, etc. Though I'm not an admin, and I only do this for family and sometimes friends. Eventually everyone learns to find the Firefox icon whether they are sitting in front of a Windows, OS X, or Linux box.

      --
      #!/
    15. Re:faking users out by BorgHunter · · Score: 1

      Churches aren't businesses. They're not there to make a profit. You rather missed the point: If you are a business, that is, your job is to make a profit, you make certain your customers can get in and do business with you.

      (By the way, I have been in churches that completely accept homosexuality.)

      --
      "Excuse me, did you say 'Trekker'? The word is 'Trekkie.' I should know; I created them." -- Gene Roddenberry
    16. Re:faking users out by rsynnott · · Score: 1

      Some churches are there to make a profit, some churches accept homosexuality, some even do both at the same time. :)

      --
      Me (Blog)
    17. Re:faking users out by rsynnott · · Score: 1

      The 10% figure is widely accepted in Europe; 2-3% seems unreasonably low. Depending on the social climate, of course, many or all of those 10% may sadly be forced to hide their sexuality.

      --
      Me (Blog)
    18. Re:faking users out by kc32 · · Score: 1

      I've done that. Except I call it idiotproofing.

    19. Re:faking users out by FLEB · · Score: 1

      I recharged it. The "E" meant empty. The "F" stands for "full".

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
  8. Re:Talk about flame bate...Typo Alert by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    Talk about flame bate...

    Talk about a misspelling!

    Maybe he's hoping not be modded FLAMEBAIT -1.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  9. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by Markus_UW · · Score: 1

    I dunno, sometimes I wonder about those AC's, what with their oft stupid and/or offensive remarks that they're always making.

  10. I liked how by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    They include a link to a website that you can purchase the book from, assuming of course you are using IE to read this review, then the book would be moot.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  11. How about.. by llManDrakell · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Don't press the green power button" Would solve a lot more of the problems I have to fix than simply shying away from IE.

    1. Re:How about.. by xnderxnder · · Score: 1

      An old friend always had this expression on hand for such situations:

      Pack it in a box, tape it up, and write "I'm too fucking stupid to own a computer" on it

      sigh.. good times

      --
      hooked up funny
    2. Re:How about.. by spun · · Score: 1

      This comes from a famous urban legend. The situation is true, and the user is dumb enough to warrant the line, but the tech in question never said it, they just said they wished they had said it. See here for more details and a good laugh.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    3. Re:How about.. by xnderxnder · · Score: 1

      meh, neat. This was amongst a circle of friends, versus a tech in a call center.

      --
      hooked up funny
    4. Re:How about.. by spun · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm not saying your friend didn't come up with this independently, just that it was a fairly famous net.story a while back. And it's funny enough to be worthy of mention.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  12. firefox is kinda worthless lately by schnikies79 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I wish I knew what the problem was. I love Firefox and have been using it for a while, but lately it has been taking huge amount of cpu time, many times sitting at 99% till I kill it. The same thing is happening on my parents computer and I have no extensions installed.

    Some sites like http://www.overclockers.com/ just locks the browser up. Firefox people, please fix this! Then I won't have to click on the blue e!

    --
    Gone!
    1. Re:firefox is kinda worthless lately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That's exactly the guys we love: "ah, it eats cpu, hurry up and fix it you morons!".

      For a start, you could file a bug report, telling what version and on which system you use firefox, send an strace or compile firefox with debug enabled. Maybe also a testcase would be fine.

      But don't poke around on people, giving no information whatsoever about the problem, and yell "fix it"!

      Asshole!

    2. Re:firefox is kinda worthless lately by schnikies79 · · Score: 1

      I've already filled out a bug report. I didn't mean to come off as being mean or angry. I don't program and have no desire to but I know it's a lot of work.

      Sorry if I came off as an asshole..

      --
      Gone!
    3. Re:firefox is kinda worthless lately by springbox · · Score: 1

      If you notice software acting strangely then you've either found a bug or something is horribly wrong with your computer. Going to overclockers.com I notice that the site loads just fine and only "eats" about 5% of the CPU's time on average.

    4. Re:firefox is kinda worthless lately by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

      I've had the same problem with Zone Alarm Pro. I have 1GB of RAM and my machine is on for days to weeks at a time. If I don't close it periodically, the memory usage goes up as high as 300! Anybody familiar with this problem, and/or what I can do to fix it?

    5. Re:firefox is kinda worthless lately by fa2k · · Score: 1

      Maybe this is why people use closed & commercial software -- they have someone to bitch to when it fails -- without fear of being attacked back by the devs :| Commerical software has more to lose on angry customers than foss (?).

    6. Re:firefox is kinda worthless lately by Antimatter3009 · · Score: 1

      I've actually had this issue as well. Seems to happen most on sites with heavy use of flash videos.

    7. Re:firefox is kinda worthless lately by temojen · · Score: 1

      With that many flash ads I'm suprised that's all it takes. That is one BADLY designed site.

    8. Re:firefox is kinda worthless lately by Soporific · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'll be sure to file that strace after I get done compiling firefox on my abacus.

      Don't you zealots get it? Most people don't want to deal with that shit, they just want it to work. If you found that your milk was tainted with something would you run a test on it to find the bacterium that was causing it? Or would you bitch to the manufacturer?

      ~S

    9. Re:firefox is kinda worthless lately by asalvari · · Score: 1

      it works for me perfectly on this site. please give better directions... so whoever works on firefox will have ready testcase.. it will be really useful

    10. Re:firefox is kinda worthless lately by matzi11a · · Score: 1

      "If you found that your milk was tainted with something would you run a test on it to find the bacterium that was causing it? Or would you bitch to the manufacturer?"

      Nah - i'd go buy a new cow.

      --
      http://www.reporo.com
    11. Re:firefox is kinda worthless lately by Griim · · Score: 1

      I would suggest installing PrefBar, just so you can easily turn off Flash and Java (you do have to Customize it to add the Java button to the bar). This would let you see if it's a Java/Flash problem that others seem to think it's related to.

    12. Re:firefox is kinda worthless lately by arose · · Score: 1

      If you want it to just work continue using your abacus.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    13. Re:firefox is kinda worthless lately by BorgHunter · · Score: 1

      Overclockers works fine for me, though Adblock says it blocked a bunch of stuff.

      Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050608 Firefox/1.0.4 (Ubuntu package 1.0.4)

      --
      "Excuse me, did you say 'Trekker'? The word is 'Trekkie.' I should know; I created them." -- Gene Roddenberry
    14. Re:firefox is kinda worthless lately by nxtw · · Score: 1

      I would recommend trying a product other than ZoneAlarm.

    15. Re:firefox is kinda worthless lately by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      I wonder if there are websites that F up alternate browsers? I see a similar complaint on the Opera forums quite a lot(not that site, but devientart causes Opera to go into fits for lots of people).

      This is the problem with allowing websites to be sloppy rather than requiring strict syntax like a compiler - some site will seriously screw up the various browsers while they try and figure out what it's trying to do...

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    16. Re:firefox is kinda worthless lately by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      You know, I've noticed an inversely proportional relationship between ads blocked and websites locking up a browser.

      More and more, people are blocking ads not because they mind them, but because they cause their browser/PC to crash.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    17. Re:firefox is kinda worthless lately by WeblionX · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've had the same thing, but then I switched to Kerio Personal Firewall and it's been using a lot less resources than ZoneAlarm. Sometimes the UI uses a bit of resources, but it seems to have gotten better in the latest releases.

      --
      (\(\
      (=_=) Bani!
      (")")
    18. Re:firefox is kinda worthless lately by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Zonealarm seems to be unable to handle a lot of connections or network traffic. Using any kind of P2P program (such as bittorrent) will basically overwhelm Zonealarm. Kerio Personal Firewall is a bit better in this regard, but I find it that it still uses a lot of CPU, though it doesn't leak memory like Zonealarm.

      My solution? Install Sygate Personal Firewall. It seems to have the best performance of the freebies, though it's interface is not nearly as nice as Kerio's.

    19. Re:firefox is kinda worthless lately by jsight · · Score: 1

      That page runs much faster once you block the big pile of Flash ads plastered all over it. It's amazing how much faster adblock makes the web!

    20. Re:firefox is kinda worthless lately by Jackmn · · Score: 1

      People have no place whining about Free software if they haven't put anything into it. A manufacturer is legally and morally obligated to provide safe products to their paying customers. There are no such constraints on FOSS developers.

    21. Re:firefox is kinda worthless lately by dartmongrel · · Score: 1

      One way to fix this for http://www.overclockers.com/ is to enable Adblock for Firefox, and then block all those silly little animated adds in their webpage. That should solve the problem for you, at least partially.

    22. Re:firefox is kinda worthless lately by Soporific · · Score: 1

      And you keep expecting masses to embrace this? The open source community while I think is a good idea still isn't understanding that until a vast majority of people can use it, will remain obscure.

      Open source doesn't have any real repercussions when they fuck up, so don't expect most people with buying power to embrace it. As far as anyone knows Firefox could fold tomorrow.

      ~S

    23. Re:firefox is kinda worthless lately by Soporific · · Score: 1

      I don't think I'm whining about open source software. I think I'm saying to the poster is that what he's asking is basically unobtainable except from users that are truly devoted to the cause. I have no problem with open source software but I think it is unrealistic to expect that people will really get into it in a mass scale while having to deal with bug reports, etc.

      And if FOSS has no obligation to provide safe products as you were saying that paid software has, then why would you buy it to put into production?

      ~S

  13. Blue E by z3r0w8 · · Score: 1, Funny

    I just rename the 'Blue E', 'Firefox download manager' and set the home page to the firefox download page.

    --
    -----
  14. Anyone else think this is a little strange? by gremlins · · Score: 1

    I mean I know there seems to be a book about everything but really how hard is it to use a browser. Now there are always tweaks and stuff that can make it better but I don't see how people are writing so many books about Mozilla stuff. I mean I even code various extensions for diffrent Mozilla projects (Firefox, Thunderbird, etc.) and I didn't even have to buy a book for that. I am also guessing that the books aren't covering developing details.

    --
    just because your a schizophrenic doesn't mean people arn't really out to get you
    1. Re:Anyone else think this is a little strange? by springbox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it's because most people aren't aware of the alternative and this book was written to get them set up with the new (to them) browser.

  15. Site user statistics by harmonica · · Score: 2, Informative

    People may be switching over to Firefox, but my site still has 55% IE users and 40% Mozilla and Firefox. And my site has primarily technical content, so I expect a higher percentage of IE on sites with content addressing the average web user.

    1. Re:Site user statistics by BorgHunter · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised if 10-15% of that IE usage is from work/school computers. I know that my school only has IE installed on the various workstations, though a couple years ago someone smuggled Firebird 0.7 onto one. Amazingly, though, some tech-savvy people still prefer IE over anything else.

      --
      "Excuse me, did you say 'Trekker'? The word is 'Trekkie.' I should know; I created them." -- Gene Roddenberry
  16. Alternate title by goodcow · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't Click on the B&N Affiliate SPAM Link

    1. Re:Alternate title by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      Why?

      This is a question I seem to have to pose more often on Slashdot. I see so many knee-jerk reactions like this (and also to "privacy issues" that really aren't issues).

      If you wanted to buy the book, what harm would it cause to buy it using the link provided? The price is the same to you. Someone makes some money: Either the person that took the time to review the book, or Slashdot. (In this case I happen to know it is Slashdot.)

      If you don't trust the reviewer and you think they are biased, then you wouldn't want to buy the book whether or not you use the link provided, right?

      So really, aside from sticking it to the man, what exactly is your reasoning behind your statement.

      Sorry, this is the second person I've seen complain about this in this one article, but there is one in every book review article.

      I swear, it seems like sometimes you guys are scared you won't be able to resist buying something, and therefore don't want slashdot to put it in front of your faces.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  17. Holy long-winded statment of the obvious! by baggachipz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why oh why should it take 254 pages to explain what the book title does in 6 words (5 and a letter)? If my mom (or yours for that matter, heh) asks for advice, I tell them where to get a good browser, they install it, and they run it. End of story. No need to spend twenty bucks and read a novel to figure it out.

  18. Maybe it's both by killmenow · · Score: 1
    it looks more like some crazy new form of anime than a fox.
    It could be a 9-tail fox.
  19. In all honesty... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    this book is almost too much.
    I'm a network security engineer and I spend ALOT of time dealing with security from various perspectives. IE does have its definite faults -- BUT -- it is nowhere near as bad as people make it out to be if one has SP2 installed, firewall on, AND you are not surfing with administrative priveledges. I use IE daily and I NEVER have had an issue. I may be trained to know what's safe and not, but I have never been hijacked, never had spyware, and never had a virus on my home system.
    Just my two cents.
    Not advocating IE use, just making a point.

    1. Re:In all honesty... by llManDrakell · · Score: 1

      I 100% agree. A well configured IE browser is just as secure as Firefox. I never have any problems with IE, and where I work we get just as many PC's with problems that use Firefox and think that they are going to be perfectly safe on the internet thanks to all the hype. In most cases, an educated end user is the answer - not Firefox.

    2. Re:In all honesty... by presidentbeef · · Score: 1

      AND you are not surfing with administrative priveledges.

      Yeah...but who does that??
      Certainly not home users, who are the ones that are having the most problems with (spy|ad|mal)ware.

      --
      Everything I need to know about copyrights I learned from Slashdot.
    3. Re:In all honesty... by Fahrvergnuugen · · Score: 1

      Rhetorical question: Is security really the only reason to advocate that people switch to FireFox?

      --
      Kiteboarding Gear Mention slashdot and get 10% off!
    4. Re:In all honesty... by linguae · · Score: 1

      IE with a popup blocker, firewall, and not as root doesn't seem too bad. However, as a Mozilla/Firefox user since March 2004, I have found using IE painful, especially if SP2 isn't installed on the computer. I cannot live without AdBlock, popup blocking (a non-issue with SP2), tabbed browsing, the search bar for Google/EBay/Amazon/Dictionary.com, and the find shortcut in Firefox (type the forward slash and type the text that you want to find). I also find myself being much more careful browsing in IE than browsing in Firefox, because one bad click can thrash the computer.

      But hey, just use whatever works for you. I also agree that the book is a bit much; why would anyone buy a book in order to learn how to use something as simple as a web browser?

    5. Re:In all honesty... by saider · · Score: 1

      A well configured IE browser is just as secure as Firefox.

      Is IE 'well configured' by default? How much education is needed to secure it?

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
  20. I need to write a book on how to tie shoes... by Ravatar · · Score: 1

    The final chapter is a bit of a grab bag. Titled "Advanced Firefox," it covers such topics as Live Bookmarks and searching in pages. Each chapter has a well-researched and useful "Where to Learn More" section pointing to web sites with tools and information.

    God knows that searching pages is an advanced topic. And if you can't catch onto the 1-click nature of live bookmarks, perhaps you should just keep using IE.

    1. Re:I need to write a book on how to tie shoes... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I dunno, there's stuff you can explain that I haven't figured out yet.

      For instance, how do you get Firefox to display a page of recent RSS entries? How do I open the "home page" the Live Bookmark came from without adding another pointless bookmark to the menu? How do I get Firefox to track which Live Bookmarks I've already read and which I haven't?

    2. Re:I need to write a book on how to tie shoes... by Lectoid · · Score: 1

      So the book you pay for has a chapter pointing to websites with free information? Brilliant!!! I am gonna write a book filled with web sites that tell you how to write books filled with web sites.

      --
      Is it just me, or do you hate it when people say "Is it just me..."?
  21. Better not click on the orange fox or the red O by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Better not click on any other browser icon either. If you need a book to show you how to use a browser then you are going to fall victim to spyware, malware, and other wares just as easily as the IE user would because you are now the security hole.

    --

    'Same speed C but faster'
    1. Re:Better not click on the orange fox or the red O by ebuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How could this possibly be insightful?

      If you don't read a book, website, or other source of information about web browers, then how are you going to learn anything about using a web browser?

      Web browsing isn't genetically transferred knowledge, and I don't care how good you are at kicking tires and banging things until they work, if you know exactly where to go and exactly which option to set, you'll do much better than the crowd that is told, "Click on that thing and mess around with it until you get an idea how it works."

      I can imagine people not using some incredibly useful features of their browser for years if they have to learn the hard way. Bookmarks, Cookie management, Password management, History browsing, Ad blocking all are items that someone will eventually stumble upon, but why make them wait the months to years to discover them haphazardly?

      I read the most condescending, hand-holding, trivializing book on PowerPoint at one time, and I still (despite being a developer) found useful time-saving stuff that I didn't know. Heaven help me if I had to find out all of that information via hunt-and-peck.

  22. Blue E= firefox by jwegy · · Score: 1

    on my parents computers. I also pointed blue E's towards firefox for a friend's wife. They have never said anything.

    I know this could be wrong, but they way I see it is my parents use me for free computer help. I get less calls this way. As for the friend's wife, well he asked me to do it.

  23. I tell all my friends to... by Throwman · · Score: 1

    click on the M instead.

    1. Re:I tell all my friends to... by ArcticFlood · · Score: 1
      From the linnk:
      It is based on the Internet Explorer browser engine (your most likely current web browser) which means that what works in the IE browser will work the same in Maxthon tabbed browser but with many additional efficient features like...


      Good to know that spyware works the same.
      --
      This is here so you don't ignore the last two lines of my posts.
    2. Re:I tell all my friends to... by Throwman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it'll work the same if you somehow still manage to download it...Maxthon has advanced popup/in-page ad/activeX blocking that prevents spyware, but you still have to take some personal responsibility and X out of any boxes trying to install it...

  24. Great: Don't click on the Blue E by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

    Fantastic, I just went through all the trouble of skinning Firefox to look exactly like IE, and even changed the desktop icon to look like IE, so that my parents would quit launching IE instead of Firefox like I tell them, and now this book comes out. I just know as soon as my parents see the title while browsing for "helpful" computer books that I might be interested they'll never click on that damn E, and all my effort to stealth-install Firefox for them will have been wasted. I might as well shoot myself now.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  25. I went ahead and clicket the blue E by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

    ... all that happened was that I saw a list of about 30 old /. articles about web browsers. It didn't seem like such a big deal. Am I missing something?

    1. Re:I went ahead and clicket the blue E by pg110404 · · Score: 1

      Am I missing something?

      Perhaps a 12 minutes windows heist?

  26. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by MajorDick · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I dono about YOU but I dont go buying books on Slashdot that are linked with an AFFILIATE ID so someone gets a kickback.
    Kudos to whoever submitted the story, nothing like free advertising, and shame on the editor that published it with the Source ID in the querystring

    Unless of course that is slashdots ID , in that case great part of submarine income on Slashdots part

    Every penny counts ? No but the melt real nice with a benzomatic

  27. I clicked on the Blue E by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

    And it took me here. I don't get it though, what's so bad about that that they have to write a whole book about it? Weird.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  28. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    254 Pages worht of advice? My god!! If they'd come up with a Firefox cheatsheet perhaps with a small section on the back on how to find more detailed information on the web.

    Either you want to know the basics (ie no more than 50 pages worth but ideally 15-25 pages) or you want to know the details (ie 250-1500 pages worth) a 250 page for dummies book is far to much. Dummies should have to read that much, and it ends up being mostly fluf anyway.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  29. c'mon man, FTP isn't *that* hard by overbom · · Score: 1

    ftp -a ftp.mozilla.org
    bin
    cd /net/ao16/lxmirror/ftp.mozilla.org/firefox/release s/1.0.4

    um, okay. let me rephrase that: FTP isn't *that* hard for uhm, your average computer genius.

  30. Wrong medium by Iriel · · Score: 1

    For starters, while I won't slam this book without reading it, I think that it's come too late. Firefox has gained a good amount of momentum that its popularity will spread more by my next point:

    Although this isn't a universal constant, I find that books like this are usually targeted at a group of people who generally don't buy any sort of computer books. It's like making a painting for the blind in a way, when the people who need to know this don't typically browse the computers and technology section at their local bookstore.

    But wait! Hope is not lost. The momentum created by Firefox has spread enough in the past year or so that even non-geeks are getting to be pretty savvy with it. What happens then, is that the popularity of non-IE spreads by word of mouth. But while there are great books on the subject out there, a technology book just seems like a poor way to get the message to tech-illiterate.

    --
    Perfecting Discordia
    www.stevenvansickle.com
  31. Re:Talk about flame bate...Typo Alert by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

    Talk about Spelling Nazi!

    Maybe you're affraid of getting modded -1 offtopic

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  32. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by damiam · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Book reviews != recommendations. A harsh review can be just as useful as a glowing one, if it helps you make a purchasing decision.

    --
    It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  33. Re:More good advice... by boinger · · Score: 1

    it was brown.

    --
    Send your friends messages of love at fuck-you.org
  34. Scaled down to a 5 page pamphlet by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    "The book feels light, despite the 250 pages..."
    Hmmm....methinks this is a bit too long to capture the average net surfer's attention span. It sounds like most people could be provided the same pertinent information in a 5-page pamphlet:
    Page 1 - A Condensed History of the Internet & Web Browsers
    Page 2 - What is a website and how can it harm you?
    Page 3 - How to surf safely and detect redirections and malware/spyware
    Page 4 - Features of Firefox Security vs. Internet Explorer Security
    Page 5 - Tips, tools and great free resources for surfing safely
    Done! Saved hundreds of trees and managed to capture the average lazy human's full attention with a quick and easy read.
    www.dontclickonthebluee.com (TBD)

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  35. Re:Crap by CountDoodu · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Maybe if it didn't take FireFox 10 times as long as IE to start up it wouldn't suck so bad. Opera is pretty quick though."

    Try Pre-linking it. You can use XP's built in prefetcher. Simply right-click on the Firefox icon you use to start the browser. Add the text /Prefetch:1 to the end of the line in the target field.

    e.g.

    "C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\firefox.exe" /Prefetch:1

  36. Re:More good advice... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

    (stoner voice on)
    "Here take this." ...Fumbles around a second while other takes it...
    "Ohh wait! don't take that."

    "whoa man, you just ate more acid than I've ever seen anyone eat before in my life, man."

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  37. Now you're just being paranoid. by crovira · · Score: 1

    "just because your a schizophrenic doesn't mean people arn't really out to get you."

    Not only that, but they aren't really there.

    "There is a man that sits in the corner of my room.
    No one else sees him.
    When I tell them that there is a man that sits in the corner of my room, they beat me."
    "We beat him".
    "Oh go away.
    You're not really there.
    Don't come back another day.
    Ple-ease." (Old, old song, 1968 or so.)

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  38. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by vasqzr · · Score: 2

    I dunno about the rest of you, but I don't go spending $20 buying 250-page, semi-technical books to toss at friends and family.

    I actually did this for a family member who would call me twice a day after I gave them a computer.

    I bought them a book on Firefox and a book on Windows XP. Now I don't waste my time on 'problems' like I can't find my music files or how do I a print a photo.

  39. Does it tell me ANYTHING I can't find by going to by caffeinex36 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does it tell me ANYTHING I can't find by going to the help menu?

    I hate technical books that tell me less information than was initially provided in the "help" section.

    in firefox (i just looked) there is even "for IE users" seperate section.

  40. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by fireduck · · Score: 1

    Every slashdot book review has the book linked with an affiliate link, with the same source id. Presumably that's one method slashdot uses to generate income. (that, and ad-supported dupes.)

  41. must ... not ... press ... by Andy+Gardner · · Score: 1
    Don't Click on the Blue E

    This single statement has just put to waste all my well thought out security measures. You know how you just have to push that big red button? now i can't help myself I just have to click on the big blue E!

  42. are people really still switching? by janneH · · Score: 1

    ".....With an increasing number of people disenchanted with the flaws, bugs and security holes in the world's most popular web browser (still) switching to the current open source champion......"

    I looked at the browser statistics at W3 Schools the other day and noticed that the most recent month both IE5 and 6 usage increased and that Firefox decreased by over a percent (19.6% to 20.7% the preceeding month). Maybe an anomaly, but notable because it is the first reverse of the Firefox trend on that web site since it was released. It makes me wonder about the statement above, and whether a flattening has started or arrived.

    1. Re:are people really still switching? by MDGordon · · Score: 1

      Who in the world needs a browser open for several days? If you're worried about losing your place, check out a handy little extension called SessionSaver.

    2. Re:are people really still switching? by westlake · · Score: 1
      I looked at the browser statistics at W3 Schools the other day and noticed that the most recent month both IE5 and 6 usage increased and that Firefox decreased by over a percent (19.6% to 20.7% the preceeding month

      Not long back, Dell committed to buying 300,000 wide-screen laptops a month from a Chinese OEM. That's a single model in a single segment of Dell's XP SP2 product line.

      The Mac Mini sells at 30,000 units a month, OEM Linux systems like Linspire, about the same. There has been no mass migration from Windows at any price point and you need millions of Firefox installs simply to keep pace with the growth in XP's installed base.

      You have to fairly deep in Geek culture to know or care about O'Reilly.
      It would be interesting to know the press run for the book, how many copies are in off-campus bookstores.

    3. Re:are people really still switching? by Arthur+Dent+75 · · Score: 1
      There is a hint there on the actual web page with the statistics why the earlier statistics are not comparable to July 2005:

      "The browser statistics below were adjusted in July 2005 to reflect page views instead of visits."

      So it's not an actual decline, just that Firefox users seem to generate a bit more "visits" than "page views". Dunno why this is the case

      --
      michael at slashdot.org: The real answer is that a couple of the slashdot authors are sick.
  43. Re:people don't change by Marc2k · · Score: 1

    Similarly, when my parents finally made the switch to broadband, I had to come over and set up their computer, etc. I deleted the IE icon from the desktop and changed the name of the Firefox shortcut to "THE INTERNET".

    --
    --- What
  44. Re:Talk about flame bate... by Khuffie · · Score: 1

    That article doesn't even mention Opera, which has the fewest security flaws.

  45. Re:Safari, Opera Firefox by frkiii · · Score: 1

    I have used Firefox for over a year now. It is a "little" slower at startup than IE. But after that, I see no performance difference between the two, whatsoever.

    But, I am running them on a 3.02 GHz CPU with 1 GB RAM system, Win XPee. However, my 2.2 GHz AMD CPU wiht 1.5 GB of RAM, Win2K. No performance difference after initial startup that I can see.

  46. Re:Talk about flame bait... by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1
    Umm, well if your lexicon appears to include solely MS IE under "web browsers", I guess you would have to throw out the word "safe".

    I agree with one of the commenters who noted that the most secure browser wasn't mentioned. (Well, okay this one is mentioned and it has a better history than the competition.)

    --
    .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
  47. Maybe not the right time by drakethegreat · · Score: 1

    I checked the W3C statistics on browsers again in the past few days and I believe its changing back in IEs favor. The figures for Firefox shifted down and the numbers for IE went up. Now because growth in Opera and others went up, it tells me that Firefox's popularity at least amongst webmasters (the people who browse W3C) declined slightly while IE went up. Not a good sign for Firefox but still the growth in Opera tells me that still people aren't too fond of IE or Firefox in the webmaster community. I myself dropped Firefox because of performance issues. I'm currently using Safari and Konquerer because I don't own Windows anyways.

    1. Re:Maybe not the right time by Brandybuck · · Score: 1
      Now because growth in Opera and others went up...

      Aaargh! You mentioned Opera! Don't do that!

      ...the growth in Opera tells me...

      You did it again! Stop, stop!

      I'm currently using Safari and Konquerer...

      I can't believe this! You've managed to mention three non-Firefox browsers in your post! I don't think we're even on the same page.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  48. TOOLS -OPTIONS -USE BLANK PAGE -OK by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    DONE

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  49. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by non-poster · · Score: 1

    Well, it is cheaper at Amazon:

    Amazon link

  50. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by sporktoast · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know what you mean. After all, affiliate links bias the recommender. They just want you to click through and buy the book so that they can make some money. I'm gonna make sure ALL of the purchase price goes to someone who doesn't CARE if they make any money on it, like .... Barnes and Noble?

    --
    In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.
  51. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Trust me, it's not easy to write a non-techie book. You may think there's no market for those kinds of books, but the fact that millions of copies of the "For Dummies" and "Complete Idiot's" series have been sold would indicate otherwise. You can't blame O'Reilly for jumping into the consumer market, it's a much larger pie than the techie market.

    I am surprised to see a non-techie book reviewed here, though. Definitely not the intended audience! But then again, every techie I know has a non-techie spouse/friend/parent, so it's good to have books to recommend to them when you get tired of answering questions :-)

    Eric
  52. Great by temojen · · Score: 1

    One of my bosses insisted that he had to have the Administrator password for his desktop... incase I'm not around when he wants to install some new (mal)ware. So I set up administrator on that machine with a red flashing desktop (and IE and firefox start pages) saying to only use that account for administration tasks. Now whenever I go into his office I see that red desktop with ie and outlook open.

  53. Re:WTF? by djward · · Score: 1

    By "recent history" you must mean "since last week in Iraq"...

  54. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by le_jfs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I do not want to go all flamebait here, but if it does not cost more to you, why not buy trough this link?
    After all, that's just a free contribution to Slashdot, a web that 1) does not require subscription, 2) where the ads are not intrusive and 3) you enjoy reading / posting.
    Maybe they have costs to cover :-)

    --
    main(char O){O++&&(((O-291)*O+27788)*O-868020?1:putchar(O++) )&&main(O);}
  55. I couldn't click on the blue e even if I tried.... by pg110404 · · Score: 1

    I don't use windows, I use linux, and microsoft is not about to port that ugly blue e to linux anytime soon.

    Now if I can just figure out how to get my computer infected with a worm or virus, I'll have a reason to reinstall the OS after 3 years. I feel like I'm missing out on so much fun.

  56. Can it tell me by dirtsurfer · · Score: 1

    Why firefox keeps locking up on me, and why I can't start it up without getting 2 or 3 msgbox errors? Because the best the firefox faq has to offer is "uninstall all your extensions, uninstall firefox and install again from scratch". Ok, did that, it didn't fix it. Now what? I'm stuck using IE again.

    1. Re:Can it tell me by torstenvl · · Score: 1

      Try deleting your profile (save your bookmarks first) and the Firefox folder under Program Files. This is assuming you're using Windows. If you're using *Nix, ditto, except that Firefox maybe be installed in various locations (depending on your flavor). Uninstall, update your locate database, and search for directories left over. For Mac, I haven't a clue.

    2. Re:Can it tell me by argent · · Score: 1

      Why firefox keeps locking up on me, and why I can't start it up without getting 2 or 3 msgbox errors?

      Friend, if you can tell us what those errors are mayhap we can figger them out for you, hear?

  57. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Because the average Slashdot reader hears so much about "clicking the blue E", and might wonder whether a book about not doing so is any good. Or at least enough of us might wonder to warrant a frontpage feature - I don't think the criterion is "average" (though many stories make me wonder if there are any criteria at all). Now lots of Slashdotters can read the review to know the book is skippable. If only more frontpage stories were such timesavers.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  58. Re:people don't change by planckscale · · Score: 1
    As much as I wish I could, I can't do this. I've tried. Especially laptop users. However, as far as I know, Citrix doesn't have a web client that works well with Firefox. Additionally, too many managers rely on Active-x based "Share my desktop" collaboration and meeting utilities. Not to mention all of the Webinars. A few geeks here get it and will run both browsers. The majority of users complain if they hit a snag browsing with Firefox and want IE back.

    --
    Namaste
  59. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

    Publishing busness wise it's a great idea. Kick out as many thick books with the promise of teaching you how to do something you don't understand while basicly confuseing or intimdating them more is great for busness.

    It's the consumer that suffers in this. Mainly in thier own ignorance.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  60. Re:Safari, Opera Firefox by Ucklak · · Score: 1

    Opera 8 is an extremely nice browser. For those of you who may have dabbled in it before version 8, I urge you to try it again.

    Safari is really nice too but that Mac DNS cache thing is really slow.

    Firefox is consistent across all OS's (Opera too) but the main reason I use FF is the extensions.

    --
    if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
  61. Re:Safari, Opera Firefox by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

    There's a very good reason IE loads faster than anything else. Part of its code is in memory all the time. It's the part used by Windows Explorer, your desktop shell. All that needs to load when you click on the Blue E is the part that isn't in use already. With Firefox, or any other browser, the entire program has to load, and that's going to take a little time.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  62. Don't eat the brown ones by amishdisco · · Score: 1

    "Uh, to get back to the, uh, the warning that I've received you may take it with how many however many grains of salt you wish, that the 'Blue E' that is circulating around us is not specifically too good. Uh, it's suggested that you do stay away from that, course it's your own trip, so be my guest, but, uh, please be advised that there is a warning on that one ok?

  63. Re:In Soviet Russia... by temojen · · Score: 1

    Try giving them a copy of the book.

  64. Re:Acid by boinger · · Score: 1
    I'm pretty sure I don't need to be that old to be able to read a transcript of a recorded event.
    Uh, to get back to the, uh, the warning that I've received you may take it with how many however many grains of salt you wish, that the brown acid that is circulating around us is not specifically too good. Uh, it's suggested that you do stay away from that, course it's your own trip, so be my guest, but, uh, please be advised that there is a warning on that one ok?
    Feel free to research further on your own.
    --
    Send your friends messages of love at fuck-you.org
  65. Re:The problem of course by f0dder · · Score: 1

    My only beef with firefox is the inability to go to the download location after a download.

    I have a peeve of not being able to launch or run the application from the folder it's installed to.

    I don't download to my desktop but to folders on secondary partitions. It's annoying that after a download I must manually go to those location using the default firefox install.

  66. Re:"Blue E" O'Reilly cover illustration by DuBois · · Score: 1

    Obviously someone didn't RTFA. :-)

    --
    The IPCC has purposely engineered a massive scientific fraud.
  67. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by jbolden · · Score: 1

    I can think of a 250 page book of issues I've had with Safari:

    I'd like to know how Safari makes choices as to which applications are used to open what vs. which plugins?

    I'd like to know how to modify what Safari considers "safe content". Can I make the rules more complex than just extensions?

    I'd like to change the look and feel of the bookmark bar so that RSS extensions have their own menu. I'd like things to automatically alphabatize (like they do in IE). I'd like to add "add folder" to the bookmarks bar.

    I use acid search for the search box. I'd like to be able to have the thing switch and then automatically switch back. Or switch for only one window. Is that possible?

    etc...

  68. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

    Wow, I thought I spell checked that too. Sorry Spelling/grammar nazis I'll try to do better.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  69. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by timothy · · Score: 2, Informative

    MajorDick wrote: Unless of course that is slashdots ID , in that case great part of submarine income on Slashdots part"

    Clearly, it's all a conspiracy.

    It's so secret that it's right there hiding in the open, in the book review guidelines linked from every Slashdot review.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  70. Re:Safari, Opera Firefox by chrisnewbie · · Score: 1

    There is no difference except for security reason and some nice tweaks from firefox.
    Other than that you have the Anti-Microsoft gang, and the fact that you cant use automatic updates with firefox, your stuck with IE.
    Bad move from Microsoft to limit automatic updates to his browser.

  71. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Insert stupid and/or offensive remark here.

  72. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Absolutely. No author I know likes bad reviews, but a reviewer that explains why they didn't like a book -- because they thought it was about X or it didn't talk enough about Y or it spent too much time on Z -- is providing useful information. Even a bad review can lead to a sale. It's the non-constructive reviews that blather on but really say nothing more than "this book sucks" that are (in my mind) unhelpful.

    Look at the reviews on Amazon for Head First Java, which is definitely not your standard book. Generally great reviews, but occasionally someone doesn't like it. That's fine if they provide some details. I love this one:

    If you are looking for a book to transition from one language to another this certainly is not it. It even says that in the introduction to the book.

    At least we know the book writers had the right audience in mind. On the other hand, this review is a bit odd:

    I think about reading it at night but fear that the pictures would haunt me in my dreams.

    OK... (backing away slowly...)

    Eric
  73. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by geeber · · Score: 1

    Because most people in the know DO have family members and friends that are not in the know. I don't pay attention to such books, but now, based on this review, I can recommend it to those who might need it.

    All in all, a very helpful review, even though I won't read the book myself.

  74. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by JPortal · · Score: 1

    But then again, every techie I know has a non-techie spouse/friend/parent Seriously? Most geeks I know don't have many friends at all, let alone NON-techie friends ;)

  75. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

    Wow, I thought I spell checked that too. Sorry Spelling/grammar nazis I'll try to do better.

    I darn you to heck!

    --
    I got my Linux laptop at System76.
  76. Rebellious reflex by OneIsNotPrime · · Score: 1

    Who else read the title then reflexively clicked the big Blue 'E' next to the article summary?

    --

    ---

    WARNING:Slashdot karma not redeemable in the afterlife.

  77. Does O'Reilly Know Firefox is not a fox??? by mrighi · · Score: 1

    Why does O'Reilly have a picture of a fox on the front of the book? Don't they know that Firefox is not a fox?

    1. Re:Does O'Reilly Know Firefox is not a fox??? by shikra · · Score: 1

      Coz the fox's referring to IE.

  78. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by TRIEventHorizon · · Score: 1, Funny

    insert something directed to the mods to mod the parent up/down

    --
    "And so the Trekkies were executed in the mannor most befitting virgins - thrown into volcanoes" - Futurama
  79. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 1

    You're a bit cynical, aren't you? Every author I know, including me, goes to great pains to write books that explain, not confuse. Sure, the publishers like to see books that can have "sequels" and "spin-offs" and other related books, but how is that different from (say) TV or film?

    Also, not everything about the book is under the author's control unless they self-publish it. The title often isn't (I certainly didn't come up with "Make Easy Money with Google", my working title was quite uninspiring) and neither is the "trade dress" of the book (layout, colors, etc.).

    Eric
  80. Anything but E by praedor · · Score: 1

    I just went through a week of extremely irritating hell because of IE. I have dual boot system that I occasionally switch from linux to windoze 2000 to play a game or 3. Never a problem mainly because I didn't have a broadband connection, only a pathetic dialup modem, so I would RARELY connect up to the net in windoze.


    Well, I recently acquired DSL in my rural area and I got connected. Within a couple days of being connected (and switching to doze to update the software and play a few RTCW online games) I got infected with that goddamned Elitebar.


    I downloaded half a dozen different anti-hijack, anti-spyware apps and not a one of them could get rid of the damn elitebar. I'd be playing a game and BOOM, up pops a spam popup for internet gambling, porn, other crap. Long story short, I finally downloaded a set of anti-spyware/anti-virus tools and, after a long afternoon of offline toiling, FINALLY got that damn elitebar killed off.


    Just to be safe, I'll download the windoze version of Firefox from linux and transfer it to my doze partition so I can install it without having to get to it with IE. Anything that causes IE to start up anymore makes me cringe, waiting to see the damn popup attack.

    --
    In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    1. Re:Anything but E by tolkienfan · · Score: 1
      1. Install squid
      2. Add rules for excluding IE from everything with certain exceptions (can do this with "user agent" string)
      3. Exclude other things (regardless of browser) - like known spyware domains (download a list from the internet)
      4. Point IE to proxy (127.0.0.1:3125 or whatever)
      5. Point Firefox et al to proxy.
      6. Set up all kinds of access controls...
      You can also install Privoxy, and point Squid to it as a parent proxy. That'll give even tighter controls.

      Certain applications (Mor*cough*pheus) use IE to pull stuff from the web. Such programs will now use the proxy which will deny access.

  81. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by usmc.spitfire · · Score: 1

    Not to mention a spouse.

  82. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by spun · · Score: 1

    Yeah, why should some other nerd be making a buck when I'm not? Let some faceless corporation make the money. Nerds should be above such things. God knows I am.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  83. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

    Remember that even X has to have things running in the background to be able to do what it does. Why not complain about them

    You are obviously new here. Slashdotters only complain. They complain about X, KDE, Gnome, Fluxbox, blackbox, openbox, windowmaker, gentoo, rehat, slackware, *BSD, slashdot, microsoft, linus torvalds, linux...I think you get the idea. Slashdotters do nothing but complain. That's the only constant here, man.

    And wtf does "becoz" mean?

  84. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by KermitJunior · · Score: 1

    Tell you what. Why don't you even the score. Have FF start on startup (put it in the start folder) and then, after he system is running (all the programs loaded). Check to see how fast it starts up... oh yeah, it's already running... just like IE.

    --
    There is a Universal Life Value Check it
  85. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

    While not completely innocent I don't blame the authors they are usually just trying to make a decent living, publishers are caught in that corporate greed, and no it isn't any different than TV or film. You werent trying to use that to improve your argument were you?

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  86. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

    I dono about YOU but I dont go buying books on Slashdot that are linked with an AFFILIATE ID so someone gets a kickback.

    Why?

    --
    Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  87. Thats all well and good... by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

    ...but many times I have no choice but to use the "Blue E" - online job applications, real estate sites, the list is endless of web sites that do not work properly on Safari on my Mac or Firefox on my PC. Heck, even the state unemployment online filing doesnt work properly. Neither does updating my profile on monster.com - gotta break out IE every time.

  88. Re:I couldn't click on the blue e even if I tried. by argent · · Score: 1

    Heh. I had a box recently where I had to update a configuration file, and when I did a PS to get the PID to send a HUP, I noticed it was sitting at simething like 10,000 minutes of CPU time. Which woried me at first, until I noticed that the process had been running since Aug03. OK, that's more reasonable.

    I haven't managed to have a box stay up as long as some of the ones at the top of the Netcraft runtime ratings. Even with UPSes, you get occasional long power outages. But really, "I'll finally have a reason to reboot the OS after 3 years" is a better taunt. :)

  89. Re:I *love* Internet Explorer by argent · · Score: 1

    IE just plain starts faster.

    IE makes your boot and login take longer, because the HTML control that's 95% of IE is used by Windows Explorer. That does make it seem to start faster, but if your system was properly designed it wouldn't.

  90. Re:Don't start the browser you use to get Firefox by FusionDragon2099 · · Score: 1

    I dunno, USB drive?

  91. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by twofidyKidd · · Score: 1

    For the lazies who won't look (Direct from the above linked Slashdot review guidelines):

    Speaking of links, please do not include links in your reviews to online bookstores. Slashdot has an linking arrangement with Barnes & Noble; that's why when bn.com carries a particular book, you'll see a link to it at the bottom of the review.

    An exception: if a book is not available from bn.com, make sure your review addresses availability: is it available used? Only direct from the author or publisher, or only from non-U.S. foreign retailer? In this case, a link to an online bookstore that actually carries it is welcome. Lots of good books are not in wide circulation -- help out your readers by telling them where to look. (And if you had to hunt to find a book that everyone should know about, that's probably worth mentioning in your review.)

    --


    Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
  92. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 1

    No, I was just arguing against the assertion that authors and publishers are explicitly out to publish crap. I don't know of anyone in the business who wants to do anything but create a quality product. But not everyone agrees on what is crappy, do they? Someone's crap is someone else's manure.

  93. Switch to Mozilla by DeadScreenSky · · Score: 1

    I've been having similar problems with the RAM usage in Firefox (and yeah, people, it's a known bug). I got so sick of it I actually switched back to plain old Mozilla, which seems much more stable than Firefox. Last time I checked it even has slightly better performance since it uses a newer version of Gecko.

    So I recommend you switch too and see if that works better for you. Your problem does sound more plugin related, but it's entirely possible that it's just yet another Firefox bug.

    --
    There is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion. -- Francis Bacon
  94. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by koreaman · · Score: 1

    Quite apparently you do not get it.

  95. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Oh, you misspelled business ("busness"), basically ("basicly"), confusing ("confuseing"), intimidating ("intimdating") and their ("thier"), but your grammar was fine. Directing you to a dictionary might have been more appropriate.

  96. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

    That is the problem with government sponsored corporatism. Corporate groupthink is much different than the group that makes it up. I'm sure everyone at Microsoft just wants to make good software. Everyone at Phillip Morris just wants people to relax and have a cigarette. Once there is a faceless corporate persona to take blame peoples honest just and honorable actions eventually get morphed into the lowest possible greed.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  97. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by Charles+W+Griswold · · Score: 2, Funny

    You are obviously new here. Slashdotters only complain. They complain about X, KDE, Gnome, Fluxbox, blackbox, openbox, windowmaker, gentoo, rehat, slackware, *BSD, slashdot, microsoft, linus torvalds, linux...I think you get the idea. Slashdotters do nothing but complain. That's the only constant here, man.

    That's right! I don't know about you, but all of this complaining is getting under my skin. It's really torquing me off! Don't these people have anything better to do than to take up valuable bandwidth by posting complaints about every little thing that annoys them and . . . umm . . . uhh . . .

    Nevermind.
    --
    "Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber" -- Plato
  98. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    Speaking of "trade dress" the cover of the book looks like in about 5 seconds you won't be able to "click the blue E" due to it being inside the fox and in about 12 million tiny pieces! http://a1204.g.akamai.net/7/1204/1401/05040811011/ images.barnesandnoble.com/images/9350000/9354791.j pg

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  99. Lack of Firefox use by AdminPrep.com · · Score: 1

    I have several friends that work at Microsoft and of course they don't use Firefox at work but most don't use it at home either. It surprises me how some people can be so blind to not even try an alternative product that has been getting rave reviews. I'm a huge MS guy but my broswer has been Firefox for sometime now. http://www.adminprep.com/ Your Source for IT Articles

  100. Re:Does it tell me ANYTHING I can't find by going by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
    Does it tell me ANYTHING I can't find by going to the help menu?

    I hate technical books that tell me less information than was initially provided in the "help" section.

    It occurs to me that the target market for this book might well be people who are more comfortable using an old-fashioned physical reference text. (Heck, the target market for this book probably isn't people who read Slashdot.)

    As well, sometimes it's just easier to have a hard copy of everything, so there's someplace to make notes, and highlight important details, and stick a bookmark.

    Finally, most of us still have a finite supply of screen space. Having a nicely bound paper copy means that I'm not giving up space on the screen--none of this mucking about trying to fit all the windows I want on one desktop. (Don't try to tell me that new users should be comfortable with tabbing back and forth between a help window and something else, either....)

    --
    ~Idarubicin
  101. Great. by James+A.+D.+Joyce · · Score: 1

    Now Slashdot is doing reviews of furry porn. This place has really gone downhill lately.

    --

    Ron dies in chapter 9 of book 7.
  102. Stupid by riiiichanchan · · Score: 1

    pathetic OReilly would stoop to that level, just goes to show you turn a good publisher bad with a few simple words

  103. Re:WTF? by bostonguy · · Score: 1

    Why would we be discussing the London incident in a discussion thread about an internet browser book?

    And you're complaining about priorities while you yourself are reading this thread!

  104. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

    I saw this book in BN a few weeks ago and I thought, "Hey this might make a good gift for non-techies". And then I saw the price. $20 is too much for what it is, A book like this should be in supermarket end of aisle displays in a pocket sized format and should cost $4.95

    But I am one of those people who thinks all tech books are overpriced. Non-techies need good inexpensive books that they can buy at every discount store, drugstore and whatnot and there aren't any.

  105. FF Still isn't 100% by Misterfixit · · Score: 1

    FF under Linux is still not able to do my on-line banking. The same problem with Opera and Mozilla. I've talked to the SunTrust Bank people and their reply was (officially, I presume) "We do not support nor do we plan to support non Microsoft compliant internet browsers due to security issues."

    Of course, they are full of crap, and simply taking the path of least resistence by "assuming" that customers are either using MS or Apple's Safari.

    Moving to another bank is not an option. I have accounts for my business with five different banks (Bank of America, SunTrust, Citizen's Bank and Trust, AmSouth, and a local credit union). NONE of them support non-MS browers; NONE of them will allow Firefox, Opera or Mozilla to carry out all functions. Interestingly, I tried Nutscrape on an old Powermac that I've had in storage since 1999 and everything worked perfectly.

    Anyone have any clever comments about how wrong I am? I detest Microsoft and everything the company stands for, but I don't let my personal feelings get in the way of running my business.

    --
    nar
  106. Re:In Soviet Russia... by mcwop · · Score: 1

    Redundant? It's the only In Soviet Russia post so far. It is the perfect In Soviet Russia post. Perfect damnit!

    --

    "I don't think it's selfish, to eat defenseless shellfish." -NOFX

  107. Don't click on the Big Blue 'E' by cecil36 · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of the Tech Support skit by 3 Dead Trolls in a Baggie.

    Click Here for the Internet Help Desk

  108. Exhaustive List of IP ./ Will Permit Profit On by patio11 · · Score: 1

    1) Software code. Sometimes.
    2) There is no #2.

  109. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by cakesy · · Score: 1

    That is the method I use to decide on whether not to see a movie. I am so cynical now, that I will only read the negative reviews, and try to understand why people didn't like them. If they didn't like a movie becuase it had an unhappy ending, or left unresolved questions, that wouldn't necessarily make it a bad movie for me. If they didn't like the movie because it had hardly any story, and was full of plot holes, then I will not enjoy it. Here is to more negative reviews.

  110. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by Evil+Grinn · · Score: 1

    but IE loads faster

    Not for me it doesn't. I have a PC where IE takes an abnormally long time to start, but this doesn't afflict Firefox. My guess is that some part of Windows itself is fucked, and because IE is so integrated into the OS it is affected by it but not Firefox.

  111. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

    Ok, tear this apart. I am honestly trying here:

    "Business-wise, in publishing, a great idea is to Kick out as many thick books as one can with the promise of teaching someone how to do something they don't understand, while basically confusing or intimidating them more is great for business.

    It's the consumer that suffers in this. Mainly in their own ignorance."

    I think I'm missing some comas in there, but I don't remember the rule for independant and dependant clauses.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  112. Re:In Soviet Russia... by JPEWdev · · Score: 1

    I don't like IE, but he almost have to use it in at the place I work.

    why?

    Because it automatically gets patched by the M$ patch server, where as we would have to manually go around and patch Firefox. Theres only two of us, and it would take a while to update firefox on 150+ systems. (the users are locked out of doing most things, so that can't do it themselves, not that i would really trust them to do anyway)

  113. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by TheWormThatFlies · · Score: 1

    Well, "is great for business" is redundant, since you've already said that it's a great idea business-wise at the start of the sentence. It also makes the sentence not make sense anymore, since you're saying "A great idea is to do something is something else". Also, why is "Kick" capitalised?

    It's much better, though. :) Using third person plural pronouns as gender-insensitive third person singular pronouns isn't really correct, but I do it all the time when I speak, so I can't be too much of a grammar nazi about it.

  114. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

    Ok, one more time:

    "Business-wise, in publishing, to Kick out as many thick books as one can with the promise of teaching people how to do something they don't understand, while basically confusing or intimidating them more is great for business."

    I did actually get an A in my College English class. I just don't usually type this way during quick slashdot posts. I suppose if I did try more eventually I'd be in the habit of doing so and it wouldn't take so much thought.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  115. Re:I for one do not welcome our advertising overlo by TheWormThatFlies · · Score: 1

    The redundancy is still there. It would probably be best if you removed "business-wise" from the beginning of the sentence. Also, "Kick" is still capitalised. And "to kick", while technically correct, sounds somewhat odd in its current position in the sentence; changing it to "kicking" may make it scan better. And there should be a comma after "more". And I shouldn't start sentences with "and"; bad me.

    So I suggest:

    "In publishing, kicking out as many thick books as one can with the promise of teaching people how to do something they don't understand, while basically confusing or intimidating them more, is great for business."

  116. Re:The problem of course by Hattmannen · · Score: 1

    FYI there are probably many solutions to this, but I've found one to my liking. It's in the form of a Firefox Extention called 'Download Manager Tweak'. It can be found at https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php ?application=firefox&category=Download%20Tools&num pg=10&id=256

    --
    People are not wearing enough hats.
  117. Re:I *love* Internet Explorer by KennyP · · Score: 1

    Because people here are always anti-some shit or another. M$ bashing is as popular here as tree-hugging is in California.

    No one has the brains to work with what they have, especially when in an enterprise - they don't have the say.

    Visualize Whirled P.'s