Slashdot Mirror


A Clock That Runs for 10,000 Years

Justin Blanton writes "Discover magazine is running an article about a clock designed to run accurately for 10,000 years. It's essentially a "future-proof" clock that blurs the line between art and functionality through advanced engineering. From the article: 'Everything about this clock is deeply unusual. For example, while nearly every mechanical clock made in the last millennium consists of a series of propelled gears, this one uses a stack of mechanical binary computers capable of singling out one moment in 3.65 million days. Like other clocks, this one can track seconds, hours, days, and years. Unlike any other clock, this one is being constructed to keep track of leap centuries, the orbits of the six innermost planets in our solar system, even the ultraslow wobbles of Earth's axis.'"

438 comments

  1. I have to change mine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It only lasted 2000 years.

    --
    Jesus.

    1. Re:I have to change mine... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Funny

      If this one fails in 2000 years as well, where do I get my warranty refund?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:I have to change mine... by macklin01 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dear Customer,

      It has come to our attention that your Clock of the Long Now (TM) was exposed to a liquid spill 500 years ago. Although it may not have caused the failure, AwesomeClock, Inc. does not cover the repair or exchange of a machine resulting from misuse, accident, modification, unsuitable physical or operating environment, improper maintenance by you, or failure caused by a product for which AwesomeClock is not responsible. The warranty is therefore voided.

      However, you can buy a new mechanical system board for 895 KiloDollars, and your warranty will be extended for 90 days. If you wish to dispute this finding, we can email you pictures that will never actually reach your inbox. Thank you for choosing AwesomeClock, Inc.

      AwesomeClock Warranty Claims Dept.

      --
      OpenSource.MathCancer.org: open source comp bio
    3. Re:I have to change mine... by koweja · · Score: 1

      Speaking of warrenties, can you leave your warrenty to your decendents? Because if not you'll get a warrenty that covers less than 1% of the claimed lifetime of the product.

    4. Re:I have to change mine... by Columcille · · Score: 1

      Ahh! But don't forget! The Raleian's will help you live the full life of your clock. If their rates are a bit too expensive for you, you might find Aubrey de Grey to be a cheaper option.

      --
      I love my sig.
  2. how very useful by somersault · · Score: 4, Funny

    *sets alarm to wake himself up in 10,000 years*

    --
    which is totally what she said
    1. Re:how very useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Then you put the snooze mode and it will ring again every century until finally you wake up... Sounds like a nifty accessory for Chtulu.

  3. Which format? by kimmo · · Score: 1, Funny

    Does it come in wristwatch models also? :)

    1. Re:Which format? by Nighttime · · Score: 1

      Not the same mechanism as in the article, but will this satisfy your needs?

      --
      I've got a fever and the only prescription is more COBOL.
    2. Re:Which format? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the batterypack weighs 3 tonnes and comes with its own rickshaw trailer.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:Which format? by Lucractius · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I read that as "will this satisfy your nerds"

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
  4. What Time Is It Now? by deathCon4 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great, So when humans are all dead and long gone, Aliens will land on Earth and know to the trillionth of the second what time it is on Earth.

    1. Re:What Time Is It Now? by polysylabic+psudonym · · Score: 1

      ...in the particular time zone that the clock was set to.

    2. Re:What Time Is It Now? by Eridanis42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Will we leave a detailed description of Daylight Savings TIme? Goodness knows it confuses enough Earthlings.

    3. Re:What Time Is It Now? by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      The clock only ticks twice a day, so the aliens will be able to tell whether it's AM or PM, the day, month, year, the position of the innermost 5 planets, and the current zodiac sign, but not the second (much less the trillionth fraction of a second.)

    4. Re:What Time Is It Now? by xSauronx · · Score: 1

      because in 10,000 years aliens landing here will need to be told where those 5 planets are: just in case.

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    5. Re:What Time Is It Now? by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      It's essentially a "future-proof" clock

      But it's not Congress-proof.

    6. Re:What Time Is It Now? by johnrpenner · · Score: 1


      yeah, but this clock will be obsoleted by the bush administration next spring -- when they change the rules for daylight savings time -- because america will not allow terrorist daylight savers to intimidate our country. ;->

  5. Outta time by WiseOwl2001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How will we know it is keeping accurate time if nothing else is as accurate to check it against?

    1. Re:Outta time by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Funny

      If it tells you new year while it has summer temperature outside, you know that either the clock went wrong, or the global warming was real, after all :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Outta time by TummyX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, either that or you're in the southern hemisphere.

    3. Re:Outta time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the original article, it indicates he planned a sync or reset mechanism attached to a bi-metal strip. The bi-metal strip would be heated by sun and sync the clock up every day there was sunlight.

    4. Re:Outta time by ifwm · · Score: 3, Informative

      By comparing the positions of the planets on the clock with the actual positions of the planets.

    5. Re:Outta time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      RTFA:


      Still, no mechanical clock, however cleverly crafted, can keep perfect time for 10,000 years. So Hillis added solar synchronization: A sunbeam striking a precisely angled lens at noon triggers a reset by heating, expanding, and buckling a captive band of metal.

    6. Re:Outta time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy. Just ask God if you can check his watch.

    7. Re:Outta time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Atomic clocks maintain an accuracy of 10-9 s/day

    8. Re:Outta time by G-funk · · Score: 1

      And here's me outside drinking XXXX in the pool every new year....

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    9. Re:Outta time by WiseOwl2001 · · Score: 1

      Or we might just have have an ice age (or two!) in 10000 years!

    10. Re:Outta time by S.O.B. · · Score: 2, Informative
      According to NIST's website about their atomic clock:

      The uncertainty of NIST-F1 is continually improving. In 2000 the uncertainty was about 1 x 10^-15, but as of the summer of 2005, the uncertainty has been reduced to about 5 x 10^-16, which means it would neither gain nor lose a second in more than 60 million years!

      A bit more accurate than 10-9 sec/day
      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    11. Re:Outta time by Phisbut · · Score: 0
      By comparing the positions of the planets on the clock with the actual positions of the planets.

      What if, 500 years from now, a comet that is currently unknown to us crashes into Venus and changes its orbit... does the clock still keep track of that, or will it suddenly become useless for the next 9500 years?

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    12. Re:Outta time by clbell · · Score: 3, Informative

      I wish I had mod points. The question is prominent in the discussion thread list but the answer is buried. The answer is even correct. I have this edition of Discover and read this article with interest the other day. The clock will not contain any precious metals or jewels so there is a reduced chance of it being dismantled in rough times. It will "reward attention" as the author put it by only displaying certain information when someone comes close to it, stepping on a pressure sensitive plate. I imagine there will be a spiral walkway working it's way up to the top going from the slowest moving parts to the fastest moving parts. I wonder if this will be freely open to the public?

    13. Re:Outta time by Baddas · · Score: 1

      If it's a comet large enough to significantly change the orbit of venus, we've got other problems, I think. Do you realize how massive a planet is?

    14. Re:Outta time by caluml · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Don't confuse the poor 'mericun.

    15. Re:Outta time by Wellspring · · Score: 1

      First rule of government contracting: Why order one when you can get two at twice the price?

    16. Re:Outta time by b4k3d+b34nz · · Score: 1

      What if, 500 years from now, a comet that is currently unknown to us crashes into Venus and changes its orbit...

      Sounds like someone played a little too much FF7...

      --
      Grammar Lesson: you're is a contraction of "you are"; your means you possess something; yore means days gone by.
    17. Re:Outta time by kzinti · · Score: 1

      He's been watching too much Star Trek.

    18. Re:Outta time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    19. Re:Outta time by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      If it's open to the public then it'll only last until some nut-job with an axe to grind against concept of time itself decides to blow it up.

      Hope they invest in a 10,000-year explosives detector and defense mechanism, too.

      If this thing is even half as monumental as he hopes it'll be, someone will want to destroy it, just to get their face on TV for a few minutes if nothing else.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    20. Re:Outta time by igny · · Score: 1

      An axe detector would suffice.

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    21. Re:Outta time by JamieKitson · · Score: 0

      JHC, Insightful?

    22. Re:Outta time by mrogers · · Score: 1

      I drink in the pool, and I XXXX in the pool, but personally I don't drink XXXX in the pool. Still, each to their own...

    23. Re:Outta time by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      On two occasions I have been asked [by members of Parliament!], "Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?" I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question.

      -- Charles Babbage

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    24. Re:Outta time by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      If that happens, the current clock maintainer simply finds the serial-bit adder controlling the venus orbit and adjusts the 28-bit code to reflect the new orbit. And maybe makes a notation in a clay tablet which he then bakes so it will last 9500 years.

    25. Re:Outta time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why was this modded Troll? He stated a quote from a source on Atomic Clocks, correcting a detail someone else said.

    26. Re:Outta time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I gather you must be from Queensland as you can't spell 'beer'.

    27. Re:Outta time by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

      Cheap wrist watches that sync themselves with the NIST 10mhz tone are not atomic clocks.

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
  6. Obviously.... by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

    Not something for the wrist. But it looks cool. Perhaps he watched The Dark Crystal one too many times though....

    --
    There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
  7. lame by LittleGuernica · · Score: 5, Funny

    No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.

    1. Re:lame by JoshNorton · · Score: 1
      No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.

      Oddly enough, however, it does in fact play ogg files.

      No one knows how.

      --
      "Stupid! Stupid stupid stupid stupid! I touched the hot wire right there - I'm an idiot!"
  8. What about the human factor? by aendeuryu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I suppose this is a moot point, but there's always the human factor. Different countries' changing stances on daylight savings time, scientists deciding to eliminate a second here or there to gain a minute here or there, etc.

    1. Re:What about the human factor? by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

      The ITU submitted a proposal this year that leap seconds be abandoned.

      And if it's tracking UTC, or as the article mentioned, local solar time, then it doesn't have to deal with stupid things like daylight savings time.

      --
      Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    2. Re:What about the human factor? by Sky+Cry · · Score: 1

      If there's someone to change daylight saving time or eliminate a second here and there, then there's someone to reconfigure the clock, too.

    3. Re:What about the human factor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh. My. God. You are the first person that didn't say "daylight savings time." I'm shocked. Someone that actually used the correct term. Excuse me while I faint...

    4. Re:What about the human factor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he's wrong and it really is daylight savings time. Never underestimate the power of language to right wrongs.

    5. Re:What about the human factor? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      all clocks are astronomy simulators. They indicate where some location on earth is in relation to the sun-earth line. Clocks with calenders indicate where the sun-earth line is in relation to a particular sun-star line or relative to the componant of the earth's rotational axis that lies in the earth's orbital plane.

      How is understanding this helpful? The gregorian calander was designed to match as closely as possible these motions, since it was determined that the orbital period is not exactly 365 days. All the machinations of that calender are really just a big integer fraction representation of the fraction part.

      Leap seconds are an extension of this idea, created as a result of more precise astronomical measurements. They are not randomly placed.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  9. Boring old news... by wsxyz · · Score: 3, Informative

    We've known about this since when? Oh yeah, since 1996. Yawn...

    1. Re:Boring old news... by Baddas · · Score: 5, Funny

      Remember, we're talking about 10,000 year timescales. A nine year old story is practically lightning fast!

    2. Re:Boring old news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you realize the irony of complaining about 9 years delay with a story about a device designed to last for 10,000 years.

    3. Re:Boring old news... by pjc50 · · Score: 1

      I think you may have missed the point of the Long Now foundation...

  10. Slashdot Effect Alarm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it have a alarm for when a site comes back online after slashdotting?

  11. I'm impressed by chrisnewbie · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Like other clocks, this one can track seconds, hours, days, and years"

    Now i can get rid of my solar clock on my lawn

  12. enough? by tezbobobo · · Score: 1

    Perhaps someone could tell me:

    Whilst I appreciate that accurate clocks are important for some tasks, when is enough enough? Seriously, what is a task that the current atomic clocks aren't up to?

    1. Re:enough? by real_smiff · · Score: 1

      RTFA, this is not about accuracy, it's about longevity. or rather, both together, which is the hard part.

      --

      This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

    2. Re:enough? by Sockatume · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, the current NIST atomic clock is accurate to 1 second in 60 million years, which somewhat trumps the one in the article. There's nothing this one can do that the atomic clock and a good computer couldn't do a lot better. What's special is that it manages to do all this mechanically, and with a degree of accuracy beyond most mechanical clocks.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    3. Re:enough? by vidnet · · Score: 1

      While the mechanicality is the greatest feature (the article mentions maintainability for any future civilisation, and insight into inner workings without disassembly), the clock isn't comparable to atomic clocks in that it keeps astronomical time, similar to UT1. Atomic clocks can only keep the equivalent of UTC (or more fitting, GPS time).

      Of course, many slashdotters would probably value atomic time over astronomical time, but that's besides the point :P

    4. Re:enough? by polysylabic+psudonym · · Score: 1

      The clock is intended to last. Not to be perfectly accurate. It improves its accuracy sufficiently to probably keep on the right day for 10 kiloyears by reseting itself every midday using a mirror and warmth from the overhead sun.

    5. Re:enough? by bpowell423 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The thing that most impresses me about this clock is that it will run by itself with no required interaction for 10,000 years. It requires no external power, no attention at all. It is self-winding (he mentions barometric pressure change as a power source). As far as accuracy goes, it synchronizes to the sun when sunlight through a peep-hole heats a bimetal strip. That should re-sync the time every sunny day, so it should be accurate until it quits working. Imagine a future, several thousand years from now... maybe there's been another "dark ages" and people are just rediscovering bits of technology. Some explorer notices this cave in the side of this mountain, climbs up there, and discovers this massive clock. That's what this guy is after. He's trying to create something on the scale of a "wonder of the world" that will exist (and continue running) for millenia and cause future generations to marvel at the technology that these ancient people had.

      Sure, an atomic clock is more accurate, and more useful, but it requires electricity, and I'm sure some attention to keep things running smoothly.

      Although, I wonder if this mechanical clock will need to be lubricated every now and again... 5000 years from now there'll probably be some wierd religion where the priest pours holy oil over the sacred time keeper, or some such...

    6. Re:enough? by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      A prize* for the first movie set in the future to feature it as a museum piece or somesuch.


      *there is no prize

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    7. Re:enough? by Baddas · · Score: 1

      Lubrication would not last long enough. Bare metal-on-metal will wear, but not become sticky enough to increase friction to the point where it stops.

      Ever try to open up a car motor from twenty years ago that hasn't been run? Let alone 10,000 years...

    8. Re:enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh great, it synchronizes with the sun... So what happens when when we blacken the sky in our feeble attempt to defeat the machines? huh? HUH??

  13. Once bitten, twice shy by Dekortage · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is just a bunch of marketing fru-fru. The last 10,000-year clock I bought only lasted 6,738 years (give or take a month). Even if you take into account my time travel, I still should have gotten a good 8,500 years out of it, at least.

    The real question is support. Will the manufacturer still be around in 3,000 years when you need to replace the little rubber feet? Are vendors and repair centers going to stock replacement parts? How much does an extended warranty cost?

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    1. Re:Once bitten, twice shy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
      How much does an extended warranty cost?

      Does it matter? In 10,005 years, you think you'll find the receipt?

    2. Re:Once bitten, twice shy by IronChef · · Score: 1

      It's worse than you think. The 10k-year warranty only covers objective time relative to a fixed clock in the factory on Earth, not any subjective time YOUR clock experiences. So if you take your clock on a long, fast space voyage, the warranty will be up in only a few thousand years of your own perceived time.

      What ever happened to pride in your work and customer service?

    3. Re:Once bitten, twice shy by rssrss · · Score: 1

      One cent, which deposited at 3% annualy compounded interest, will be $9*19^99 in a mere 7,943 years.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
    4. Re:Once bitten, twice shy by njh · · Score: 1

      "One cent, which deposited at 3% annualy compounded interest, will be $9*19^99 in a mere 7,943 years."

      Which will almost be enough to buy a can of coke.

  14. I want to have one! by Vario · · Score: 5, Informative

    The clock looks like ThinkGeek could sell quite a lot of them, it may be a little on the expensive side. A lot of high-tech mechanic combined with a polished look so that any other clock looks childish.

    The article is rather slow to get already so use mirrodot instead: http://www.mirrordot.org/stories/608e5b4931282247b 42f18bb66f3c291/index.html

    1. Re:I want to have one! by slideroll · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but it only comes with a 1 year warranty

    2. Re:I want to have one! by luisdom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Given that the final version will be 60 feet tall, I wonder how much will shipping cost...

    3. Re:I want to have one! by !splut · · Score: 1

      The clock looks like ThinkGeek could sell quite a lot of them, it may be a little on the expensive side.

      For you geeks on a fixed income, I hear ThinkGeek will be running an installment plan with payments as low as $5 a month for 1,000 years. Best of all, the first two months are free.

      --
      The angel in the oatmeal.
    4. Re:I want to have one! by Suidae · · Score: 1

      As a geek with a CNC mill and a couple of electronic digital clock projects completed, this is a very attractive project.

      Unfortunately I haven't been able to find any detailed plans for the construction of the elements of the clock.

      Anybody see any construction details?

    5. Re:I want to have one! by anymouse · · Score: 1

      You can get DWG or PDF drawings of the original prototype - the one in London - at Long Now's shop page, http://longnow.org/shop/free-downloads/

      --
      --The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese
    6. Re:I want to have one! by Suidae · · Score: 1

      Cool, thanks. I would not have thought to look in the shop for it.

  15. Re:In related news... by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, it was most probably for monitoring the decay of disposable nappies in landfill sites.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  16. Too Complex by N8F8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For every variable you introduce, the liklihood of defects rises fivefold.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:Too Complex by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      MS Windows is screwed then.

      Oh wait, that just helps to confirm your hypothosis.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Too Complex by Itchy+Rich · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For every variable you introduce, the liklihood of defects rises fivefold.

      For every generalised statistic you quote, the likelihood of talking accurately about any specific application decreases fivefold.

      These people seem to have put so much effort into thinking through possible variables that could effect this clock, from the value of the materials to the transparency of the operation, that I'd be very surprised if they didn't stop to consider one of the two most fundamental aspects: reliability.

    3. Re:Too Complex by Compuser · · Score: 1

      Yep:
      "A sunbeam striking a precisely angled lens at noon triggers a reset by heating, expanding, and buckling a captive band of metal."
      My guess is that this will not last even a century. Certainly this
      device sounds like it won't survive being submerged in sand and mud
      for a while. The pyramids did survive under sand but they had no
      function other than being giant man-made warts.

    4. Re:Too Complex by mlush · · Score: 1
      My guess is that this will not last even a century. Certainly this device sounds like it won't survive being submerged in sand and mud

      Where is the sand and mud going to come from? Its up a mountain. and if they design the entrance right (add a U-bend and some doors) should keep the elements away from the mechinism. From the clocks POV a blocked entrance could be a good thing its self winding the worst that could happen is the solar reset hole gets blocked up. People are its biggest danger to bronze age tech Iron and steel are valuable!!

    5. Re:Too Complex by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Got a cite for your statistic, or did you just pull that out of your ass?

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    6. Re:Too Complex by Compuser · · Score: 1

      Uh-huh. That's what Egyptians thought and look what their pyramids
      went through.
      Here's one scenario: Californian earthquake, major parts of California
      break off and fall into the ocean, the waves swamp much of southern
      West coast covering it in deep mud. And that's just taking what FEMA
      already projects to happen soon and making it a bit more apocalyptic.

      You want another example: nuclear war with Russia or China or both.
      Doesn't take much imagination to see Nevada covered in sand and dust.

      Again, that's just something we can see in the next few years. Now think
      10000 years ahead.

    7. Re:Too Complex by elmartinos · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but your statement is too general to be true. For example, let ants build an anthill. Does the likelihood of defetcs increase whenever you add an ant? not at all! In fact, the more ants you add the quicker they will build the anthill.

    8. Re:Too Complex by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      actually complex maybe good in this case. When making parts a typical tolerance for machined parts is +-.005.
      The amount they very should be a random amount. So if you stack 12 one inch blocks the random difference will tend to cancel each other out. If you stack a thousand they will tend to cancel even more. Of course you do have a chance of your tolerances stacking i.e. all of the parts tending to be + or all tending to be minus. If the distribution is really random then the more parts the better.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    9. Re:Too Complex by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Here's one scenario: Californian earthquake, major parts of California break off and fall into the ocean,

      My god, did you get your education solely from Superman movies? The eastern edge of the pacific plate is not going to "break off". It is moving in a general northwesterly direction and eventually (in perhaps a quarter million years) a slice of western California will separate from the north american plate and water will fill behind it. NOTE: this will happen gradually; in fact, it'll happen so slow that no one will notice. So quit buying desert real estate like Lex Luthor waiting for "the big one" to turn it into beach front property.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    10. Re:Too Complex by Compuser · · Score: 1

      Curiously I am entirely unfamiliar with the
      Superman mythos (didn't grow up in the US).
      I am however living in California and I have
      seen plenty of talk about a major earthquake
      and how it could cause a tsunami and wipe
      out most stuff to the south of Mojave.In any
      case, I was just giving a hypothetical
      example.
      I guess examples don't work for some people.
      Let's generalise. A large complex structure
      is vulnerable to:
      1. Geological changes - earthquakes etc.
      2. Climate changes - imagine Nevada become hurricane land or tornado land
      3. Planetary-scale changes - e.g. major meteor hit
      4. Man-made changes - wars, looting, etc.
      5. Erosion
      6. Wildlife infestation
      The list goes on.

      This guy's clock is a copout anyways. The
      galaxy will still be rotating around its
      center 10000 years from now so a large scale
      clock is already there. The key is readout.
      How do you make something people will read
      10000 years from now. No answer so far. He is
      still thinking. Basically his prototypes are
      useless because the hardest point is yet to
      be addressed.

    11. Re:Too Complex by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Reliability? Don't worry about it, from the article:

      "The Long Now Foundation made a serious commitment to the final clock when, in 1999--or, as foundation literature renders this and all other years, '01999'"

      It's not hard to be that reliable when every year is 01999.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    12. Re:Too Complex by joshv · · Score: 1

      The clock 'ticks' twice a day. In 10,000 years, this is 7.3 million ticks. I am imagining with a faster tick rate, say once a second, you could test the entire range of it's design life in short order (in fact, it would take 84 days). Thus it would be quite easy to root out any bugs in this 'too complex' device.

    13. Re:Too Complex by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Curiously I am entirely unfamiliar with the Superman mythos

      The first superman movie with Christpher Reeve hadd Lex Luthor plotting to get rich by 1) buying cheap inland desert property, 2) hacking into SAC and launching a nuke at the San Andreas Fault, thereby 3) triggering "the big one" which 4) would cause half of California to "fall into the ocean". The scheme was successful, but was "undone" by Superman turning the earth backwards to reverse time and fix everything. Even by comic book standards this was pretty weak story.

      I am however living in California and I have seen plenty of talk about a major earthquake and how it could cause a tsunami and wipe out most stuff to the south of Mojave.

      Such talk is nonsense. Most of the Los Angeles basin is well above 150' elevation. A 60' surge would wreck a lot of beachfront and beach-adjacent construction, but that's all. There are no less than THREE mountain ranges between Mojave and the coast. Whoever said that doesn't know anything about the local geography or tsunamis.

      .In any case, I was just giving a hypothetical example. I guess examples don't work for some people.

      Sorry. I'm some nut who likes hypothetical things to by possible. Fairies, the Easter Bunny, and California falling into the ocean are just too fanciful for me to take seriously.

      I guess examples don't work for some people. Let's generalise. A large complex structure is vulnerable to: 1. Geological changes - earthquakes etc. 2. Climate changes - imagine Nevada become hurricane land or tornado land 3. Planetary-scale changes - e.g. major meteor hit 4. Man-made changes - wars, looting, etc. 5. Erosion 6. Wildlife infestation The list goes on.

      Indeed, I totally agree with you there. Man's struggle to make a permanent mark upon the world is an age-old folly. Heck, we have entire religions (Buddhism) based on accepting the impermanence of everything!

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    14. Re:Too Complex by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      Yeh, I wonder if the affects of not considering how reliability effects their clock ends up effecting the actual affects themselves.

    15. Re:Too Complex by cratermoon · · Score: 1

      Nevada won't be covered in sand and dust, it'll be covered with glass.

    16. Re:Too Complex by blincoln · · Score: 1

      The "California breaking off and falling into the ocean" meme is really long-lived, and I'm curious how it originally got started.

      I mean, if you think about it for more than two seconds, you'll realize it just doesn't make sense. Do people think California is floating on the water, held in place only from the side like the cliff in a Roadrunner cartoon?

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    17. Re:Too Complex by SirPavlova · · Score: 1
      The scheme was successful, but was "undone" by Superman turning the earth backwards to reverse time and fix everything. Even by comic book standards this was pretty weak story.

      Actually, he flew around it really fast, so fast that time went backwards... wasn't it some kind of really screwy application of relativity theory? Terrible though it was, I think that's pretty good for a comic as rubbishy as Superman.

      --
      Yar.
  17. Rambaldi by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

    In other news, scientists around the world have started collected schematics and writings made by a Renaissance-era scientist name Rambaldi.

  18. G-forces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how accurate this mechanical clock is when it is subjected to unusual g-forces.

  19. Not mentioned in the article... by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

    It sounds nice, but is it Y2K compatible?

    1. Re:Not mentioned in the article... by DiscoDave_25 · · Score: 1

      Yes. It started at 23:00 on 31/12/1999.

    2. Re:Not mentioned in the article... by benito27uk · · Score: 1
      Well his earlier prototypes were so I'd assume so:

      "Hillis is in the process of rolling out these and more ideas in a series of increasingly complex prototypes. The first one, now on permanent display at the Science Museum in London, was financed by an anonymous donor who lent it to the museum. "The deal we offer is, if you fund the next stage of the development of the clock, we will give you a prototype," says Hillis. "We have spent millions of dollars so far--I don't know the exact number."

      "The nine-foot-tall London clock uses a slowly rotating torsional pendulum, ticks once every 30 seconds, and tracks hours, sidereal and solar years, centuries, phases of the moon, and the zodiac--and happens to be hauntingly beautiful. Incredibly, its three-year-long construction was completed in a mad rush scarcely one hour before midnight on December 31, 1999. That meant there was no time to test it before the switch to the year 2000, the most complex date change in the Gregorian system since the year 1600 because it involved a once-in-400-years leap year exemption."

    3. Re:Not mentioned in the article... by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      The more appropriate question is it y10k compliant.

    4. Re:Not mentioned in the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually, it is. The Long Nowers tend to write dates with a leading zero (eg October 19, 02005).

      The word of the day is: bondsmen

    5. Re:Not mentioned in the article... by wild_berry · · Score: 1

      I understand that you're quoting from elsewhere, but 2000 was a leap year, a one-in-four-hundred-year exemption from the normal 'centuries aren't leap years' rule. That's it as I remember it. At the moment, the Wikipedia agrees with me that 2000 was a leap year, but it is, after all, our socially constructed version of the truth...

  20. The Danger of Vandals and Other Human Disasters by Alien54 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Aside from Natural Disaster and Unusual Weather Events, the one thing I can imagine being a problem is the run of the mill ignorant human being.

    The natives of Cairo stripped the pure white polished casing stones from the great pyramid to build a large number of building in their city. Nothing against the need for public housing, but it is a shame. There are plenty of other examples as well.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:The Danger of Vandals and Other Human Disasters by surprise_audit · · Score: 2, Interesting
      From Wikipedia, another great building destroyed by stupidity:

      In 1687 the Parthenon suffered its greatest blow when the Venetians attacked Athens, and the Ottomans fortified the Acropolis and used the Parthenon as a powder magazine. On September 26 a Venetian shell exploded the magazine and the building was partly destroyed.
    2. Re:The Danger of Vandals and Other Human Disasters by drew · · Score: 1

      Likewise, the Colosseum has been looted for materials many times in its nearly 2000 year existence. During the Renessainse, for example, it was widely used as a source of marble, and I believe a lot of structual metal was also scavenged for reconstruction efforts during and after World War II.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
  21. Time as a cultural concept by 8tim8 · · Score: 1

    Isn't the whole concept of time a human-centered activity, meaning that concepts relating to time change over time? The clock might be able to tick off the seconds over 10,000 years, but will it be able to reset itself when the switch date of Daylight Savings Time (in the US) changes in a year or so? What about future changes of that sort? TFA is actually pretty fascinating but it sounds like the inventor paid much more attention to engineering problems than to human factors relating to the concept of time.

    1. Re:Time as a cultural concept by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

      What? Daylight saving changes back.. and then foward again every year. Therefore the actual time never actually changes, it just is added to for a set period.

    2. Re:Time as a cultural concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up you blithering idiot.

    3. Re:Time as a cultural concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sir, please read the WHOLE article, then post about it, rather than skimming and posting like you know it by heart.

      The creator most definitely did account for "human-centered activity." He's not making the clock out of jewels or other rare things, to prevent looting. He's not using electricity, to make its workings more readily apparent, and to guard against inoperation in the event of economic or cultural collapse. He hasn't even decided yet how to display hours, minutes, and seconds in the final version, but instead has stuck to more universally recognizable things like years (as a function of trips around the sun, not as January firsts).

      Please, stop blathering. People like you ruin online forums like Slashdot.

  22. The clock requires maintenance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The article i slashdotted, but if it's the clock I am thinking of, they made it deliberately so it requires regular winding (not sure how often). That is, it's not a "set it and forget it" type thing.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clock_of_the_Long_Now

    the article seems slashdotted.

    Seems a bit silly to me for them to require that, given that we as a species get bored of things .. the should account for that. I suppose if someone finds the clock after 10,000 years they'll be able to crank it up .. that should be awesome to do. It should be placed in a hollow large chamber of obvious intelligent design, so that if the place is ever buried .. a future archaeologist will be able to detect it and recognize that it's not a natural cavity etc. Also I hope we're around and it's not the descendant of a mutant penguin who ends up cranking it back up rather than a human.

    1. Re:The clock requires maintenance by AndersOSU · · Score: 2, Informative

      The timekeeping mechanism is self winding, but the display requires winding. The idea is that it will keep time regardless, but someone (or something) is required to read it, so "reward" them for being there by updating the display.

    2. Re:The clock requires maintenance by bpowell423 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I read the article before it was slashdotted. He intends to build the final version of this clock in a limestone cave, half-way up the side of a 10,000 foot cliff. The entrance will look natural enough, especially after several thousand years, but as you go deeper into the cave, you begin to see the workings of the clock. First, the slowest moving things like the zodiac, then years, months, etc, getting to faster moving pieces as you go deeper into the cave. All the way back, you finally get to where the heart of the clock is ticking. This guy is definitely trying to create a "wonder of the world" and it's not hard to imagine an "Indiana Jones" type of event where some future archaeologist rediscovers this thing. The fact that the display freezes until someone else winds it (he mentioned stepping on a plate to wind the display), is genious. Imagine you're this explorer, sweeping away cobwebs to get a closer look at the machine. The display reads sometime in the 23rd century. As you step closer, you step on a plate in the floor that sinks under your weight. The display begins to move and when things settle down, the current date, maybe in the 57th century, is displayed.

    3. Re:The clock requires maintenance by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Imagine you're this explorer, sweeping away cobwebs to get a closer look at the machine. The display reads sometime in the 23rd century. As you step closer, you step on a plate in the floor that sinks under your weight. The display begins to move and when things settle down, the current date, maybe in the 57th century, is displayed.

      What a waste. What you should do instead is make a mechanism that starts playing modern music at tremendous volume when the explorer steps into the plate. Perhaps show some pictures too... I vote for that music video someone made of Powerpuff Girls and Night of Fire :).

      Seriously, thought, this is a nice project (I think - the article won't load), but if we can build a machine that stays functional this long, shouldn't we consider building something more informative - a movie theater and lots of films, for example ? Or would that violate copyrights and get you arrested - after all, we have no way of knowing how many people might view those movies at some point in future, and no one seriously believes that anything now copyrighted will have its copyright expired in 10 000 years, do you ?-(

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    4. Re:The clock requires maintenance by Holi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Idea behind the The Long Now Foundation is to think about the future, not in the terms of tomorrow or next week or even next year, but int the terms of next century and next millenium and so on. They want us to have a far reaching view of the future so as to understand our actions have consequences beyond our generation.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    5. Re:The clock requires maintenance by slicer622 · · Score: 2, Funny

      And then the boulder starts rolling, arrows, pygmies, etc. Lets put a video camera in there, Lucas will foot the bill.

    6. Re:The clock requires maintenance by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Sounds very much like Heinleins foundation in his future history series (I forget the name at the moment, which means I need to re-read the future history).
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    7. Re:The clock requires maintenance by rah1420 · · Score: 1

      Are you thinking of the Long Range Foundation or the Howard Foundation?

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
    8. Re:The clock requires maintenance by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      The former, thanks ;)
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    9. Re:The clock requires maintenance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's like Schrodinger's Cat, right? Time doesn't exist until you examine it.

    10. Re:The clock requires maintenance by gtm256 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This project assumes we'll be more advanced in 10,000 years. It's possible a tribe could stumble across it and start worshiping it. Or maybe they'll think that the clock is what's running the earth. I'm not sure they can really anticipate what effect this will have, if any at all. Kind of a useless and vain thing to do, imho.

    11. Re:The clock requires maintenance by zecg · · Score: 1

      3D Realms are also a part of this, mind you.

      --
      .i lu doi ringos.star. xu do puku'aroroi dunli dopecaku leni virnu li'u
    12. Re:The clock requires maintenance by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      ...then he shouldnt power it with petroleum...?

    13. Re:The clock requires maintenance by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

      The project does not assume the people of 07005 will be more advanced. On the contrary, one of the constraints is "mechanism must be maintainable with bronze-age technology." Read the article.

  23. Actually, it just occurred to me... by GReaToaK_2000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anyone remember how "some" people get/got all worked up about the Mayan Calendar? How it "ends" at, oh I don't remember exactly, but it was supposed to end sometime around 2005 or 2006 I believe...

    So...

    Who's to say that the Mayan Calendar creators simply didn't do the SAME thing these people did? That is to make a Clock/Calendar which is accurate for 'n' number of years into the future.

    There is NOTHING cosmic, or "End-of-the-world-doom-and-gloom" about the Mayan calendar either... It was probably something as simple as some Mayan's decided to make their Calendar last for a LONG DAMN TIME!!!

    It is probably just THAT Simple!

    Just a thought.

    1. Re:Actually, it just occurred to me... by nagora · · Score: 2, Informative
      but it was supposed to end sometime around 2005 or 2006 I believe

      2014, I think. There was a difference in opinion between lowland Mayans and highland Mayans but it was only a matter of a year.

      Also, they didn't think it was the end of the world; they thought the Gods would return and judge our progress. If they didn't like what they saw, THEN it would be the end of the world. So, obviously, we're okay...er...where's the exit again?

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    2. Re:Actually, it just occurred to me... by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1
      The Mayan End of Days is December 21st, 2012.

      You haven't been playing Hostile Waters enough.

    3. Re:Actually, it just occurred to me... by GReaToaK_2000 · · Score: 1

      Is it 2014? thanks, couldn't remember...

      I understand what you mentioned about their reasons for building it. You must admit though, how "some" people can interpret "they thought the Gods would return and judge their progress" as end of the world, at least as far as "some" christians would view it. Personally, all I can think of when I read that quote is the Gods come back and say, "You FAIL!!!" LOL!!!

      Well maybe you don't hear it, but anytime that thing (Mayan Calendar) gets mentioned so many people I see/read/hear come up with the WHACKIEST things about it... I simply posted an amusing-to-me comment/opinion that popped in my head reading the article...

      Personally, I don't think this new clock could possibly last 10k years but who knows...

    4. Re:Actually, it just occurred to me... by grimJester · · Score: 1, Informative

      2012, according to Wikipedia

      "The turn of the great cycle is conjectured to have been of great significance to the Maya, but does not necessarily mark the end of the world. According to the Popol Vuh, a sacred book of the Maya, they were living in the fourth world. The Popol Vuh describes the first three worlds that the gods failed in making and the creation of the successful fourth world where men were placed. The Maya believed that the fourth world would end in catastrophe and the fifth and final world would be created that would signal the end of mankind.

      The last creation ended on a long count of 13.0.0.0.0. Another 13.0.0.0.0 will occur on December 21, 2012, and it has been discussed in many New Age articles and books that this will be the end of this creation or something else entirely."


      To paraphrase Bill Gates, 13.0.0.0.0 should be enough for anyone.

    5. Re:Actually, it just occurred to me... by nagora · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Personally, all I can think of when I read that quote is the Gods come back and say, "You FAIL!!!" LOL!!!

      Well, what I didn't mention is that the Mayans thought that this was the fifth attempt - each time the Gods made people from different things (the elements and then flesh and bone, I think) and the first four times said exactly that and scrapped it all to start again. So the outlook isn't good, but it's nice that they thought there was SOME chance of getting it right!

      Ah, people, eh?

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    6. Re:Actually, it just occurred to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maya_calendar#End_of_ the_world.3F

      says it's actually much further, but the Shadowrun source book agrees with Dec. 12, 2012 (which I prefer to believe, having not actualy studied any mayan history).

      Additionally, the better reason to get worked up about the mayan calendar isn't that it has an end, but that it is so damn far in the future. Shows some serious long term thinking (which most societies are short in supply of). Thats all this is. (That and some clever mechanical engineering).

    7. Re:Actually, it just occurred to me... by paulpas · · Score: 0

      Ask Marduk.

      --
      -PMP-
    8. Re:Actually, it just occurred to me... by ErikRed1488 · · Score: 2, Informative
      2014, I think.

      It's actually December 21, 2012.

      Maya Calendar on Wikipedia

      --
      I was not touched there by an angel.
    9. Re:Actually, it just occurred to me... by Pfhorrest · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Maya believe that time is circular.

      The end and rebirth of the world is not a matter of failure or victory, it's just what happens. Every Long Count (52,000 years), the world is "reborn" - this one comes to an end and another one begins. This date range is actually based on stellar movement, although as I recall there are a lot of amazing "coincidences" about such stellar movement too - the Mayans based it off of planetary positions, as everything in the solar system should be in the same place at two dates exactly 52,000 years apart, but also the Milankovitch (sp?) cycle, the wobble of the Earth's axis, lasts 26,000 years, so two of them is a single Long Count, and IIRC either 26,000 or 52,000 years is also something like the amount of time it takes for the galaxy to rotate once or some such. It's been a while since I researched it but it's all just stellar movement, nothing mystical about it.

      The date is December 21, 2012, by the way. We've got two months and two days until the End Times begin. (Yes yes, I'm crossing mythologies now, so sue me, it's an old hobby).

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    10. Re:Actually, it just occurred to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Mayan Calendar Stone accounts for the precession of the earth, so that its accurte for over 26,000 years. (A calander is a form of clock, with not a lot of granularity.)( Please try to remember that the length of the sideral year, 365.2422 days, was a mystery to western science, until the reigh of pope Gregory )

      To contruct their calendar, the mayans would have had to observe the sky enough to notice the change of the position of the polar zenith, and more to be able to know both its structure, and duration. Quite a feat for a stone age culture of increadible art, and human sacrafice.

      ( Is there such thing as a Mayan Milleniumist? )

  24. Surprising by BronxBomber · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am surprised by the questions/comments regarding practicality. Whatever happened to doing something neat simply because "you could"?

    --
    ...both interiorlly, and exteriorlly.
    1. Re:Surprising by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Maybe all those posters asked/commented about practicality simply because they could?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was crushed by capitalism wherein only the practical is relevant.

    3. Re:Surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're apparently new here, so let me explain.

      The majority of slashdot posters are here to attempt prove to you that they are smarter than everybody else.

      Slashdot -- News for know-it-alls.

  25. Some similarities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Everything about this clock is deeply unusual.

    I wouldn't say that. The idea of charging people extra for timepieces with functionality they'll never use is quite common. How else do you explain so many watches that can withstand water to a depth of > 1 metre?

    1. Re:Some similarities by m50d · · Score: 1

      Buy yourself a £2 snorkel facemask and swim down 3-5m sometime. It's amazing what you see down there, even in cold British water
      s. Certainly worth doing.

      --
      I am trolling
    2. Re:Some similarities by bohemian72 · · Score: 1

      Besides the underwater exploring the other responder mentioned, there's always the 'oops, I dropped my watch in the pool' factor. 1 meter is pretty much the shallow end of many pools.

      --
      The greatest thing you'll ever learn is just to love and be loved in return.
  26. A clock by FidelCatsro · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Which lasts 10,000 years.
    A server which last 10,000 Milliseconds .
    A story about an atomic clock being 9 years out of date has a certain poetry to it .

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  27. I first read about this in 1998 by EchoMirage · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm not usually one to complain about the age of articles on Slashdot, but I first read about the Long Now project in a Wired cover story published in 1998. Perhaps the article submitter didn't know about it until now, but this is far from a new project.

    1. Re:I first read about this in 1998 by sita · · Score: 1

      but this is far from a new project

      Indeed. Recent archaelogical research indicates prototypes were already around during Pharao Amenhoppsan III:s reign, some 3000 years ago.

    2. Re:I first read about this in 1998 by Derek+Pomery · · Score: 1

      No worries, is just a dupe.
      http://slashdot.org/science/03/04/04/0137210.shtml ?tid=134
      And there were many mentions by users on /. for years before that. Heck. I learned about this first on /.

      But an interesting dupe nonetheless.
      Good to see more info on the project.

      --
      -- perl -e'print pack"H*","6e656d6f406d38792e6f7267"' /. ate my old sig. Bastards.
    3. Re:I first read about this in 1998 by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      I'm not usually one to complain about the age of articles on Slashdot, but I first read about the Long Now project in a Wired cover story published in 1998. Perhaps the article submitter didn't know about it until now, but this is far from a new project.

      I think if Slashdot can cover Linus's every burst of indigestion and Microsoft's every scary move, it seems reasonable to check in on the Clock of the Long Now every decade or so. Especially since there is actual news: Discover just put the clock on the cover because the Long Now just completed the display of the solar system.

    4. Re:I first read about this in 1998 by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      Yes, we've been reading about this Long Now clock for a long time. What is taking these Long Now guys so damn long?!1!

    5. Re:I first read about this in 1998 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "No, no, we have not even begun upon the path. Ed Gruberman, you must learn patience." "Yeah yeah yeah, patience. How long will that take?" (The Frantics, Ti Kwan Leep)

    6. Re:I first read about this in 1998 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On their timescale, that's still now. :-)

  28. G-forces? by VJ42 · · Score: 1

    Is that a new product from Google? GForces

    --
    If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
  29. However... by jettoki · · Score: 1

    ...this one uses a stack of mechanical binary computers capable of singling out one moment in 3.65 million days.

    Unfortunately, these computers suffer from the dreaded Y12K Bug.

  30. But is it blinking 12:00? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn power cord.

  31. American time zones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if it will convert stupid American acronyms for time-zones like EST that's nobodies ever heard of to the more sensible GMT-5 (or UTC) like the rest of the world use.
    How many man years does that waste for the rest of the planet doing the conversion.

    1. Re:American time zones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that really a problem for you? As a pilot, I spend a bit of my time trying to convert from EST/CST/MST/PST back to worthless GMT times just to communicate about weather/flight plans, etc. Now, the Long Time clock should pick GMT just because it's the normal reference, but it's not a reference that makes any more sense than any other except in terms of tradition. Get over your UK self. :)

  32. Too good to pass up... by farnsaw · · Score: 1

    This is just too good to pass up so I won't!

    Did they plan for the Y10K bug?

    Built in 1996... must run Windows 95... must have been rebooted too many times to count already.

    Current computer uptime records are very sub 100 years.

    Stonehenge was designed for the same thing and it is only 5000 years old.

    etc...

    etc...

    etc...

    --
    "Computer Scientists can count to 1024 on their fingers" (non-mutant, non-mutilatated, human computer scientists)
  33. flashes 12:00 by dreadlocks · · Score: 3, Funny

    .. and when it suffers a power loss it will flash
    12:00:00.0000

  34. Great, does it have an alarm? by MrDelSarto · · Score: 5, Interesting
    With all this fantastic clock technology, where can I get an alarm clock that has technology that wasn't cutting edge in 1969?

    I'd like

    • Ability to set different alarms for Monday-Friday and Sat-Sun
    • Multiple alarms, so I can get up early and my parter can sleep in until the second alarm for her goes off
    • Digital tuning (AM/FM) and volume control
    • Ability to match a station/volume to a function: i.e. go to sleep with quiet AM radio and wake up to loud FM radio


    Clock radios haven't changed at all since I first got one when I was about 5! Someone out there must be able to package up a glorified palm pilot with some big buttons and red led's and make a killing. These days you could put 802.11 in it and get weather/traffic reports on a led ticker ... I'm sure there is a market!
    1. Re:Great, does it have an alarm? by Flaming+Babies · · Score: 1

      The "Dual Alarm" allows a time for radio and a separate time for the buzzer.

      Each supports: Every Day, M-F or Sat-Sun and the RADIO alarm lets you set the station to play
      when it comes on, which can be different than the station played for 90/60/30/15/ minutes
      with a different volume setting.

      Turning the alarms on and off is easy (just press the Radio or Buzzer buttom - each time it
      turns on or off the alarm). Push and hold the radio or buzzer button to set the alarm time
      for the alarm in question (radio or buzzer).

      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B000 1Y6J1Y/103-8033020-0764649?v=glance

      --
      The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously.
    2. Re:Great, does it have an alarm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you need is to:

      1) Acquire one (1) USB radio antenna
      2) Use your computer's crontab or scheduled event facility
      3) Move said computer closer to your bed.

      I agree that a true alarm clock should have all this kind of stuff built in. But I think the variety and depth of features you describe are at odds with the rather limited interface of current LED-based clocks. Sure the chips behind them can handle it, but how would you program the damn thing?

      Outside that, are you any good with a soldering iron? If you were to hack something up with a PIC, an existing digital radio circuit and a nice graphical LCD display, you'd really have something there.

    3. Re:Great, does it have an alarm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Multiple alarms, so I can get up early and my parter can sleep in until the second alarm for her goes off

      "Multiple alarms, so I can go home while the bitch is still sleeping"

    4. Re:Great, does it have an alarm? by wild_berry · · Score: 1

      If you build it, they will come... But if you don't, it may be possible to get Neuros to add the features to their PMP.

    5. Re: Great, does it have an alarm? by gidds · · Score: 1
      My requirement is even simpler: variable snooze.

      Press the Snooze button once, you get the usual delay of 10 minutes. Press it again, and the delay goes up to 20 minutes. And so on. No extra buttons, doesn't break any existing UI, and the extra logic should be pretty trivial. If you want to be flash, have it wrap around after an hour or whatever.

      After all, 10 minutes isn't a snooze -- 10 minutes gives you just enough time to fall asleep before jolting you awake again! A snooze is half an hour or so.

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    6. Re:Great, does it have an alarm? by grimJester · · Score: 0

      I'd settle for anything that can play an mp3 as the alarm. I hatehatehate my clock radio that jolts me awake instantly. I slap it until it's quiet, then wake up 15 mins later. Rinse and repeat for 1-2 hours. I waste 5% of my life this way.

      I just want something that will play a decent sound, slowly increasing in volume over 15+ minutes.

    7. Re:Great, does it have an alarm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Required functionality is a part of most PBX systems... and several cellular telephones have this too...
      get real, trash your clock radio and buy a new cell phone.

    8. Re: Great, does it have an alarm? by borawjm · · Score: 1

      Perhaps a button that calls the boss and tells him that you are sleeping in today aswell? I'd pay for that.

    9. Re: Great, does it have an alarm? by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Well Mine is even simpler.

      I need a clock with big enough numbers that I can read through blurry half closed eyes.

      I automatically wake up between 6-6:30 every day. The only exceptions are when I stay up late then i will sleep until either the sun annoys me awake or 8 hours have passed whichever comes first. (usually the friggin sun) This is called a regular sleep cycle.

      Of course I am also abby-normal

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    10. Re:Great, does it have an alarm? by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      Here's a product that gets two out of four from think geek. Otherwise, I suggest putting an FM tuner card in a computer and programming the thing yourself...

    11. Re:Great, does it have an alarm? by cogg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My cell phone does this ( apart from point 4 ).

      cog

      --
      "Never 'clear the air'. Instead, investigate all the subtle nuances of the word 'fester'." - R. Candappa
    12. Re:Great, does it have an alarm? by intangible · · Score: 1

      I do live near an airport, but I swear, my computer is louder than some of the jets that fly over; I don't know about sleeping any closer to it :)

    13. Re:Great, does it have an alarm? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      There's a Timex clock that hits 3 of the 4. It has three alarms (radio, CD player, nature sounds) that can be set independently. The radio is digital tuning. And there's the typical "Sleep" function which turns on the radio for up to 90 minutes at a reduced volume, and the Sleep volume has three levels.

    14. Re:Great, does it have an alarm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * Ability to set different alarms for Monday-Friday and Sat-Sun
              * Multiple alarms, so I can get up early and my parter can sleep in until the second alarm for her goes off
              * Digital tuning (AM/FM) and volume control
              * Ability to match a station/volume to a function: i.e. go to sleep with quiet AM radio and wake up to loud FM radio

      Except for the last requirement, Timex (http://www.timexaudio.com/Viewitem.asp?idproduct= 946) makes one for about $70. I've had it for a few years (I've seen it at Best Buy and Office Depot) and it is a great improvement over my last one. I guess you would have to buy a separate radio to go to sleep to. The Timex comes with nature sounds or CD music and allows you to adjust the sleep volume on only those two.

    15. Re: Great, does it have an alarm? by anakin876 · · Score: 1

      I had ana alarm clock where the snooze started at 9 minutes and got shorter and shorter every time you hit the button. That thing drove me crazy!

    16. Re:Great, does it have an alarm? by Flaming+Babies · · Score: 1

      Why are people responding with clocks that match 2 out of 4 and 3 out of 4
      2 hours after a response matched all 4 wants (and at a much better price)?

      --
      The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously.
    17. Re:Great, does it have an alarm? by mengel · · Score: 1
      So go to Sourceforge, set up a project, and build a nice SuperAlarmClock project; hook up a nice Shuttle PC with a TV/Tuner board, and you can have an
      • alarm clock
      • radio
      • cd/DVD player
      • mp3/ogg/whatever player
      • web browser
      which not only will have whatever alarms you want, but will let you watch Jay Leno at night and wake you up with your favorite song & the current weather webpage in one window and Slashdot in the other in the morning.

      In other words, don't whine about it, write some code!

      --
      - "History shows again and again how nature points out the folly of men" -- Blue Oyster Cult, 'Godzilla'
    18. Re:Great, does it have an alarm? by graemecoates · · Score: 1

              * Ability to set different alarms for Monday-Friday and Sat-Sun
              * Multiple alarms, so I can get up early and my parter can sleep in until the second alarm for her goes off
              * Digital tuning (AM/FM) and volume control
              * Ability to match a station/volume to a function: i.e. go to sleep with quiet AM radio and wake up to loud FM radio


      cron + a few small shell scripts? Stick it in a small form factor PC or hide the box in a cupboard and have a small 7" LCD display or something near the bed (plus a wireless mouse/keyboard). Set it to boot at a given time using the BIOS wakeup feature, and the alarm sequence to follow out of the boot sequence. Pickup all the radio stations via broadband (no more nasty AM reception issues).

      Of course, the excuse: "Sorry I'm late but my kernel panicked on boot" would be, ahem, original.
    19. Re:Great, does it have an alarm? by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      They've moved along a little at least. I love my alarm clock radio, it's got dual alarms for partners in bed with different wake times, one is pitched a bit higher than the other making it easy to recognize which one is sounding. It's got a great beep, starts out quietly, gently, and over the course of a minute or so gets louder and louder until you've really got to deal with it. No sudden shriek to make you leap out of bed with your heart pounding. Customizable snooze interval. And a nap timer that can be set quickly for 10 minutes to 2 hours.

      It doesn't do the "nice radio station to fall asleep with, and the energized station to wake up with" that would be neat, but it's totally the best alarm clock I've had, cost $20 CDN. GE makes it. Kind of off-topic, but a good alarm clock is one of the important things in life to me, so I had to speak up. :)

    20. Re:Great, does it have an alarm? by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1

      Some of that stuff's available now - my bedside radio also has an alarm that you can set to not go off at weekends, is tuned digitally, and because it understands RDS and has the traffic news turned on, is louder in the morning than the evening.

      The probably is a market for what you're talking about, but if the price point turned out to be much more than a cheapo clock radio from your local Electricals R us I don't think that it'd be that big.

      The big difference between now and and when I (at least) was 5 is that you do have the option to do it yourself, using cast-off PC bits. It won't be particularly elegant (at least until current generation of smaller PCs and handhelds get chucked out), but it'd have all the functionality you're asking for.

    21. Re:Great, does it have an alarm? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Also:

      *Light up controls (C'mon, these things are meant to be used in the dark!)
      *Get rid of the snooze button. The snooze button is for the weak.
      *An alarm that starts out soft and gets louder over a short period of time. I know some alarm clocks have this, but it seems to be reserved for expensive models.
      *A display that shows the next time the alarm will go off. Make it easy to see that it is set the way you want it, especially if you are going to include 7+ alarm times.
      *Alarms that auto-shutoff after 15 minutes or some simular time period. If you have ever lived in a college dorm you know what I'm talking about.
      *No trendy bright blue displays.

    22. Re:Great, does it have an alarm? by torqer · · Score: 1

      I hate to burst your bubble dude. But not everyone in life is a programmer. Not everyone here is a programmer. Geek doesn't equate to programmer. Simply because you may (or may not be) a wizard programmer doesn't mean that everyone else. Next time you want a random item, say a gold ring, I hope someone tells you stop whining, fire up the furnance, and melt some gold! Most people also wouldn't consider an entire computer a valid replacement for an alarm clock. Maybe a little over kill.

    23. Re:Great, does it have an alarm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frankly, I'd rather have one of the old motorized electric clocks with hands. Those didn't jump to 12:00 and have to be reset (a long, tedious process) every time the power went out for a few seconds.

    24. Re:Great, does it have an alarm? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Hm. Mine has all of those except the fourth one. It also uses the radio time signal (or whatever) to set its own clock, which is actually why I bought it... I got sick of Daylight Saving Time catching me off-guard every single goddamned year, and this clock takes care of that automatically.

      But in general, you're right... there's a lot they could do with bedside clock radios that they aren't doing or aren't doing right. And even with a decent little CPU in there and a red LED display, it's not like they'd be more than $30-40 bucks... hell, you can get a scientific calculator for $40 that does ten times more than this hypothetical alarm clock would.

    25. Re:Great, does it have an alarm? by paulpas · · Score: 0

      How about an 120db of a consistant sin wave between 2000Hz to 5500Hz to wake your ass.

      --
      -PMP-
    26. Re:Great, does it have an alarm? by bprime · · Score: 1
    27. Re: Great, does it have an alarm? by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      I use variable snooze; but I go in the opposite direction. :) smaller snooze intervals each time.

      45 9 * * 1-5 aumix -v90 -W90 ; mpg123 /home/dkr/mp3/alarm/New_World_Symphony.mp3 ; sleep 600 ; mpg123 /home/dkr/mp3/alarm/New_World_Symphony.mp3 ; sleep 500 ; mpg123 /home/dkr/mp3/alarm/New_World_Symphony.mp3 ; sleep 300 ; mpg123 /home/dkr/mp3/alarm/New_World_Symphony.mp3 ; sleep 200 ; mpg123 /home/dkr/mp3/alarm/New_World_Symphony.mp3 ; aumix -v66 -W66

      killall mpg123 is my snooze "button". The new world symphony is great because it has quite variable rhythm and tempo, and starts with a crescendo steadily getting louder. Unfortunately I can't listen to it anymore for entertainment since all I can think about is turning it off!

      And of course, using a cron job like this easily allows for multiple alarms, and a different
      alarm time for weekends, NTP synchronization, and many of the other features people have requested.

    28. Re:Great, does it have an alarm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously... check out Chameleon Clock
      http://www.softshape.com/software/desktop/chamcloc k/features/

      Grab yourself an old laptop, and use that instead.

    29. Re:Great, does it have an alarm? by Renshi's+Girl · · Score: 1

      While this clock http://www.thinkgeek.com/cubegoodies/lights/788e/ doesn't quite do all of the things that you list in your post, it does do quite a few. I'm currently thinking of getting one for my hubby and I.

    30. Re:Great, does it have an alarm? by mengel · · Score: 1
      One assumes someone reading this forum already has a computer, and possibly several. You don't need another one, just some sort of snooze/alarm cancel button for the one you have.

      Granted, not everyone here is a programmer. But it might be the inspiration for someone to learn; just as wanting a ring you can't find in the store might be the impetus to take some classes on jewelry making.

      --
      - "History shows again and again how nature points out the folly of men" -- Blue Oyster Cult, 'Godzilla'
    31. Re:Great, does it have an alarm? by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

      With all this fantastic clock technology, where can I get an alarm clock that has technology that wasn't cutting edge in 1969?

      I'd like

              * Ability to set different alarms... [more feaatures]


      What you need is an 8051 and a C cross compiler.

      --
      Tag lost or not installed.
  35. Sundials by zenst · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Sure there many old ones about that still work without needing there battery changing or winding up ;).

    1. Re:Sundials by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Indeed, there's the one clock known as "solar system" which already works quite fine since millions of years. Indeed, it worked great for such a long time that on one of its hands life evolved ...

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Sundials by slim · · Score: 1
      A sundial, like a conventional clock, overflows to zero every day. Hillis wants us to think of tomorrow, not just today.

      32 bit UNIX time overflows every 136 years. Hillis wants us to think beyond 2038.

      64 bit UNIX time won't overflow for 290 billion years, but any computer currently in operation will stop working, or at least lose power eventually, and Hillis wants us to think beyond the lifetime of a conventional UNIX box.

      Plus, of course, a little computer with a screen hasn't the majesty Hillis envisages. RTFA:


      Hillis's plan for the final clock, which he reserves the right to change, has it built inside a series of rooms carved into white limestone cliffs, 10,000 feet up the Snake Range's west side. A full day's walk from anything resembling a road will be required to reach what looks like a natural opening in the rock. Continuing inside, the cavern will become more and more obviously human made. Closest to vast natural time cycles, the clock's slowest parts, such as the zodiacal precession wheel that turns once every 260 centuries, will come into view first. Such parts will appear stock-still, and it will require a heroic mental exertion to imagine their movement. Each succeeding room will reveal a faster moving and more intricate part of the mechanism and/or display, until, at the end, the visitor comprehends, or is nudged a bit closer to comprehending, the whole vast, complex, slow/fast, cosmic/human, inexorable, mysterious, terrible, joyous sweep of time and feels kinship with all who live, or will live, in its embrace.


      And as for practicalities -- like much conceptual art, the idea is more important than the implementation, yet the implementation has to exist in order for the idea to carry any weight. There's no point spending time in a gallery perusing Duchamp's urinal; it's just a urinal. But had he not put that urinal in a gallery, had he instead just said "Hey, if I just put a urinal in a gallery, would it be art or not? Clever huh?" and not followed through, I wouldn't be talking about it now.
    3. Re:Sundials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There's no point spending time in a gallery perusing Duchamp's urinal

      That's one of many reasons it isn't art.

  36. Lots of nerds missing the point, here by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes, we could spend all day talking about the technicalities of the clock, the politicization of human calendars, and what the odds are of the thing not getting blown up by someone who thinks that only Allah Knows What Time It Is, etc... but the whole point of the project is cultural/philoshopical. It (as the finished project is conceived) is a conversation piece designed to make observers actually think past what they're going to have for lunch, and whether or not Battlestar Galactica is a re-run or not tonight.

    By checking the clock to see what time it is, in the context of a 10,000-year swath of time (still a geological/evolutionary blink of an eye), one is at least encouraged to keep that larger context in mind. It's intended to dimish the long-term weight of petty squabbles, perhaps remind people that 10,000 years back we were in an ice age, that sort of thing. Might even make you think about your 401k contribution (or forget about it!).

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:Lots of nerds missing the point, here by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2, Funny
      whether or not Battlestar Galactica is a re-run or not tonight.

      Since the current season of BSG has ended the answer to that question is yes so you need not bother to wonder.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    2. Re:Lots of nerds missing the point, here by Phae · · Score: 1

      It (as the finished project is conceived) is a conversation piece designed to make observers actually think past what they're going to have for lunch, and whether or not Battlestar Galactica is a re-run or not tonight. Oh sweet! There's a Battlestar on tonight?!

    3. Re:Lots of nerds missing the point, here by smoker2 · · Score: 1
      By checking the clock to see what time it is, in the context of a 10,000-year swath of time (still a geological/evolutionary blink of an eye), one is at least encouraged to keep that larger context in mind.

      I think its a neat idea, and I hope they include a sliding scale that shows where exactly in that 10,000 year period the viewer is.

      Actually, this reminds me of Asimovs Second Foundation. Where at a prescribed date and time, something is set to happen.

      The guy building this doesn't have access to nuclear tech. does he ?
      Actually, I think I'll be dead by then so I don't care. /SUV-owner

    4. Re:Lots of nerds missing the point, here by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      Yes, we could spend all day talking about the technicalities of the clock, the politicization of human calendars, and what the odds are of the thing not getting blown up by someone who thinks that only Allah Knows What Time It Is, etc... but the whole point of the project is cultural/philoshopical. It (as the finished project is conceived) is a conversation piece designed to make observers actually think past what they're going to have for lunch, and whether or not Battlestar Galactica is a re-run or not tonight.

      And that's exactly what most of the things you just mentioned are about. How do you make a clock that lasts 10,000 years? (we don't tend to make things that last anywhere near that long). The clock getting blown up by fanatics is would require a drastic change in the culture, something that could only happen in maybe a hundred years. It's difficult to talk about the clock without thinking about the timescale it's supposed to exist in.

      It's a pretty cool idea. As a culture it seems like we don't tend to make "wonders of the world" anymore. We've recently gotten this notion that new is good, and old is bad. Kind of a messed up idea in many respects. New is anything made in the last 6 months, and old is anything older than 3 years.

      --
      AccountKiller
    5. Re:Lots of nerds missing the point, here by sjames · · Score: 1

      It's intended to dimish the long-term weight of petty squabbles, perhaps remind people that 10,000 years back we were in an ice age, that sort of thing.

      Not only that, but it's the only thing of real durability being built in our lifetimes. The Ancient Egyptions, Mayans, Chinese and others built lasting structures that are still here to this day. Meanwhile, practically everything we build today will be gone in 100 years at most and those that are still here will be purely luck. The clock of the long now is very deliberatly bucking the trend towards ever more temporary artifacts. To my knowledge, it is the first and so far only significant mechanism in human history that is actually designed and intended to still be functional when nobody alive ever knew the builders, much less for 10,000 years.

  37. awesome. . . by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

    . . . and it will only cost as much as the gross national budget for the next 10,001 years, too!

    --
    disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
  38. slow news day by hachete · · Score: 1

    ...what it said

    --
    Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious
  39. 10.000 year is a long time. by leuk_he · · Score: 2, Insightful

    500 years ago amirica was discoved (from the spanjard view), look what is acutally left of those ships.
    2000 years ago the roman empire ended. Most what left of is are some ruins and some idea's
    5000 years the piramids were build, look what is left of that. They are eroded. We have a vague clue of their purpose. (storing mummmies, but mummies were never found in it?)
    10000 years ago? Star-gate might be right about it, maybe man did not exist in it's current form.

    You might enineer it well enough to measure a wobble of the earth, but to actually package it so it can survive 10.000 years and still have a meaning is not only an engineering feat, it must be an antropology feat as well, to make people long after this understand what it is and leave it in pieces.

    1. Re:10.000 year is a long time. by SimilarityEngine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      2000 years ago the roman empire ended. Most what left of is are some ruins and some idea's

      Don't forget the roads!

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    2. Re:10.000 year is a long time. by Meostro · · Score: 4, Interesting
      The pyramids are still standing. Stonehenge is too. This clock is made out of stainless steel and monel, a "nickel-copper alloy" that is known to be corrosion resistant. The final version is expected to be made of the same, plus some bronze and other long-wearing substances. The overall design principles of the Long Now clocks will make them physically durable, it seems like mechanical longevity is going to be the least of their problems.

      The anthropologic aspect of this project is going to be the most difficult, simply because society is a factor. The rise and fall of civilizations happens much more often than the rise and fall of material objects. We can still recover bronze-age artifacts (circa 5000 years old), and even some from the stone age (anywhere from 8,000 to 30,000 years old), but we have very little information on what the societies were like. Most of what we have is just a guess.

      The good news is that those same design principles that make it physically longstanding address these problems from a sociologic / anthropologic POV also.

      Maintainability - The clock should be maintainable with bronze-age technology

      Maintainability and transparency:
      • Use familiar materials
      • Allow inspection
      • Rehearse motions
      • Make it easy to build spare parts
      • Expect restarts
      • Include the manual

      (emphasis added)
    3. Re:10.000 year is a long time. by timeOday · · Score: 1
      You might enineer it well enough to measure a wobble of the earth, but to actually package it so it can survive 10.000 years and still have a meaning is not only an engineering feat, it must be an antropology feat as well, to make people long after this understand what it is and leave it in pieces.
      I think you're basing your prediction of the future too much on the past. Just because we know hardly anything about 10k years ago, doesn't mean people 10k years from now won't know about us, simply because things now are a lot more advanced than then. I think it's entirely possible these words I'm writing will still be around and comprehensible in 10k years, despite not being very important. Why? Because they're so easy to store and copy now. It's true prehistory wasn't that long ago, but I don't see us going back. Even if you prefer not to see any fundamental distinction between man and animal, it's clear that mankind is on a completely different technological curve than any (other) animal - none has progressed in controlling its environment anywhere near as far or as fast (to me that is a fundamental distinction). Even without that advantage, dinosaurs did quite well for 150 million years or so. It would be disappointing if we don't one-up them :)
    4. Re:10.000 year is a long time. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually I think it's interesting that you brought this up. I've read in several places that 10,000 years from now, not much of our cities will probably remain (especially if we nuke ourselves, which was the dominant theory when most of what I read was written I think) but the Interstate Highway system will be there for hundreds of generations to come. Obviously at ground level it will eventually get overgrown and might not be easily distinguishable, but from an aircraft or satellite the right-of-ways and grades will be pretty unmistakably artificial.

      How this relates to the clock project I'm not sure: maybe they should bring an Interstate out there shaped like a big arrow so that aliens or humans returning to Earth in a few millenia will know where to look... :)

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    5. Re:10.000 year is a long time. by farmerj · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Newgrange is a megalithic passage tomb, build in the Boyne valley of county Meath, Ireland.

      Carbon 14 dating has placed the age of the site to be 3200 years old, put into perspective that is around 600 years before the pyramids and 1000 years before Stonehenge.

      The passage grave is so constructed so that light reaches the inner chamber of the 1-acre mound during the winter solstice (for three days around the shortest day of the year).

      Oh and the roof still doesn't leak.

      If you're familiar with Irish weather, that's an achievement on its own.

      Much like Stonehenge no one is sure why it was built. (apart from being a grave)
      Could the designers have had similar intensions as this project has?

      --
      Independence? That's middle-class blasphemy. We are all dependent on one another, every soul of us on earth. G.B Shaw
    6. Re:10.000 year is a long time. by mrogers · · Score: 1

      Does this mean the aliens will conclude that New Jersey was the centre of human civilisation?

    7. Re:10.000 year is a long time. by ThePelt · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, yeah. Obviously the roads. I mean, the roads go without saying, don't they?

    8. Re:10.000 year is a long time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All right, but apart from the sanitation, medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, the fresh water system and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?

    9. Re:10.000 year is a long time. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      The pyramids are still standing.
      Certainly, but not in the form they were built. The mud brick ones are badly worn, and the stone ones have been vandalized by having their marble outer surface torn off.
      Stonehenge is too.
      Most of it. But parts of it aren't. (Several lintel stones fell to the ground centuries ago, and were placed in their current position in the 1800's.)
  40. oh great! by Vyol8tor29 · · Score: 2, Funny

    My employer will probably implement this as a timeclock...

  41. Reminds me of this by MikeHunt69 · · Score: 3, Informative
    The most complicated portable watch ever made is the Patek Philippe Calibre 89 pocket watch. Although it doesn't keep track of the wobble of the earth, it does keep track of things like sunrise/sunset, the position of the stars, moon phases, leap year, etc.

    I don't know the price but since their wristwatches start at around USD$8,000 and go up to over $200k, I suspect you could buy a very nice car for the price. Patek make rolex look like cheap crap (which is mostly true).

    1. Re:Reminds me of this by LeBain · · Score: 1

      The Earth does not wobble; it precesses, which basically means there is more than one axis of rotation. The main rotation gives us day and night. The tilt of the main axis gives us summer and winter (as the earth is either on the left or right of the Sun). Secondary (and tertiary) rotational axes give us ice ages and global warming.

      Here's some more information on precession:
      http://www.crystalinks.com/precession.html

      Wobbling implies a change in angular momentum, but as an object floating in space (with nothing to provide footing for an opposite and equal force), the earth's angular momentum does not change significantly (unless hit by a really, really big object).

      --
      Give serendipity a chance.
  42. It's a beautiful idea by hywel_ap_ieuan · · Score: 2, Informative
    What a beautiful concept. It reminds me of the kinds of things that I sometimes come across in fantasy and sci-fi stories. They don't have to be integral to the plot, but they illustrate the world the author has conceived - think of the statues at the Falls of Rauros in LoTR.

    The references in other comments to atomic clocks miss the point entirely. Atomic clocks are about precision and accuracy. This clock is concerned with accuracy, but only at long scales. A mechanism to re-set to local noon, as described in the article, is plenty to catch the daily drift and would probably compensate for running fast/slow for many days if the sky were cloudy. For the kind of astronomical time this clock is concerned with, being a few seconds behind or ahead is irrelevant.

  43. But time is an illusion by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lunchtime doubly so

    --
    init 11 - for when you need that edge.
  44. Applied Minds by hoshino · · Score: 2, Informative
    I believe that this is the same clock that was mentioned by Time a few weeks ago in an article on Danny Hillis, the co-founder of Applied Minds.

    These guys are geniuses, the kind you see in movies. Danny Hillis himself thought up the idea of parallel processing for his doctaral thesis while he was a grad student. They don't specialize in any fields, they apply their creativity to R&Ds in almost any field, be it medical, defence or engineering.

    They are the ones who created that voicebox which replies incomprehensible snippets of your voice to prevent eavesdropping, a human-size Dino robot walking around Hong Kong Disneyland that can mingle with the tourist without any danger because it is able to shift its weight such that if its foot encounters an eggshell, it can back off without breaking it. (that's in the middle of a step) and the company also created a tabletop display that can show a 3D view of any location on earth by using thousands of pins to replicate the actual reliefs.

  45. Read the Long Now website by fantomas · · Score: 1
    indeedy - read the long now website - they are aware that for it to last 10,000 years it will need to be woven into the social/ ritual fabric of culture.


    As you rightly point out, it just takes one group of people to trash it, hey in the UK lots of people got upset about the Taleban blowing up the Buddha statues in Afghanistan, but then remembered we also destroyed most of our own religious heritage through a series of political /religious fundamentalist purges - Richard Lionheart (lets sell gold and relics to fund the war and pay for freeing the king) Henry VIII and the dissolution of the monastries (I'm going to start my own flavour of Christianity so I can marry again, this gold will do nicely), and Puritanism (destroy the evil Catholic relics). Seems like humans do a pretty good job of trashing their long term histories every few years :-)

  46. Star Axis by uuilly · · Score: 1

    Star axis is a huge sculpture in new mexico that measures the woble of the earth's axis. The artist, Charles Ross, is associated w/ the long now foundation that did the clock. http://epoch.longnow.org/share/longnow/landart/Sta rAxis.JPG http://www.kunstraum-innsbruck.at/foto/landart/pic 06g.jpg Website w/ geometric explanations: http://www.staraxis.org/index0.html

  47. Re:In related news... by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

    Geeze, I gotta get my eyes checked. I could have sworn that said "disposable nipples"...

  48. What about vandalism? by Beatlebum · · Score: 1

    Some a-hole will lodge a rock in its gears within the first 6 months.

    1. Re:What about vandalism? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Or what if an animal gets into the mechanism and blocks it?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  49. Impressive engineering. by standards · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This clock is designed to be more of a monument than a useful timepiece - something that will help people understand their short time on earth, versus a science instrument.

    However the engineering effort to make this clock as accurate and as long-lasting as promised is truly impressive. Few things built today are designed to last that long (exception: perhaps long-term nuclear waste storage?) The materials : stone, steel, tungsten - and the size of the parts, and the mechanics of the thing that allows for 10,000 years of wear, along with easy maintenance - man, these are not things that even your top-notch mechanical engineer does.

    Interestingly enough, this guy is working on a long term clock, while others can't even get little clocks to work right. Some public clocks can be grossly imprecise. It's funny how someone running a time service can't get their own time right. Hopefully the telcos will hook up their time services to this clock - or NTP services. Whichever is easier.

  50. How do you win at tic-tac-toe? by WillAdams · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    ``As an MIT undergrad in 1975, Hillis and his friends built a binary computer out of 10,000 Tinkertoy pieces. It could beat all comers at tic-tac-toe.''

    Okay, I _must_ know this secret --- I've taught my kids to play, and while I can still beat my son (age 5), my daughter and I _always_ wind up with a tie. I even saw a movie once where this nifty supercomputer called Joshua couldn't win a game....

    William

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    1. Re:How do you win at tic-tac-toe? by sam_paris · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its actually not possible to "always" win at tic tac toe if the second player always plays perfectly.

      If player one and player two are both perfect players the game will always be a tie.
      I know this is true as my major was AI and my final project was investigating reinforcement learning where I designed agents to learn how to play tic tac toe and connect 4.

    2. Re:How do you win at tic-tac-toe? by Riddlefox · · Score: 1

      AI..... What's the A stand for?

      Was Connect-4 a good choice for your project? I thought I read a paper a while ago that said that given perfect players, whoever goes first will always win at that game. Or did you choose those two games to see the difference in results for a game that will always end in a tie and a game that will always result in a win for one of the players?

    3. Re:How do you win at tic-tac-toe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ``As an MIT undergrad in 1975, Hillis and his friends built a binary computer out of 10,000 Tinkertoy pieces. It could beat all comers at tic-tac-toe.'' ... when the human got a three move handicap.

  51. firmware upgrades will be needed by tota · · Score: 1

    Whenever someone decides to add another leap day (every 400 years or something) or take one out (every ~2000)

    or when a disaster has a big enough impact to make the earth wobble (tsunami 2004 anyone?)

    How do you upgrade your watch?

    --
    TODO: 753) write sig.
  52. Materials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's almost a footnote in TFA, but it seems like the materials questions pose the greatest obsticles here. The clock is largely mechanical in it's action. So this would involve building a mechanical system that needs to run smoothly (read: without stiction ANYWHERE in the main stack) for 10,000 years. Obviously, anything that will corrode is probably not the best idea. Not only that, but the parts need NOT to bend under their own weight in 10,000 years--no way to seal out gravity. Finally, since there are a lot of moving pieces, this needs somehow to be lubricated in such a way that 10,000 years of dust and grit can't clog the mechanism. Even if you seal the mechanism in some kind of dustproof inert gas chamber, now you've got to ensure your seal holds for 10,000 years...

    This is an interesting concept, but it seems like there's a LOT of cleverness that needs to come out in the choice of materials if this is going to go from something that in theory could possibly run for 10,000 years to something that we'd actually EXPECT to have run for 10,000 years.

    1. Re:Materials by Zphbeeblbrox · · Score: 1

      True, So just imagine the side benefits of a project like this. It could conceivable advance materials and engineering sciences just by existing. If for no other reason than getting a chemist to think about what kind of materials would last for that time span. We may see some advances as a result that we might otherwise have had to wait for.

      --
      If you see spelling or grammatical errors don't blame me. I tried to preview but IE here at work borked the CSS
  53. Does it have an alarm function? by eldavojohn · · Score: 0

    If so, how many years do I get to sleep when I hit the snooze bar?

    --
    My work here is dung.
  54. I've got the same thing.... by se7en11 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I've already made one of these. If you don't believe me, you're more than welcome to come back in 500 years to check it. Na nana boo boo

  55. Cesium? by pvera · · Score: 1

    Is this more precise than a Cesium atomic clock? When it comes down to it, all the leap calculations, etc. are programmatic and are not related to super-accurate timekeeping. What you really want is a really stable timing signal, which is pretty much what you get out of a Cesium atomic clock.

    I don't know if this is done in the civilian industry, but back in my military satellite communication days, we used to keep no less than two Cesium clocks on site at all time. These produced insanely accurate 10 MHZ and 1 Pulse per second signals which were then distributed to all our other electronics equipment in-house. All our up/down converters, multiplexers, modems, etc. relied on this centralized clock. If one of the clocks got out of sync we were not even allowed to fix it ourselves, instead these were shipped over to the US Naval Observatory, which was in charge of dealing with these.

    --
    Pedro
    ----
    The Insomniac Coder
  56. Yes, but.. by D4MO · · Score: 1

    ... can I clip it to my wang?

    --

    Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
  57. Is it Mac compatible? by gearmonger · · Score: 1

    This will be good...when the apes inherit the earth, at least they'll know the correct date and time.

  58. Only 12,000 years? by FishandChips · · Score: 1

    I guess that clocks are literally "future proof" since they can only tell the time today, right now. Bit of a limitation really.

    Maybe some billionaire will end up with it. Good luck to the makers! But I suspect the builders of Stonehenge might have scoffed a little. Their clock is still going and it has no moving parts.

    --
    Las qué passoun
    tournoun pas maï
  59. This guy IS a genius! by kalirion · · Score: 3, Funny

    As an MIT undergrad in 1975, Hillis and his friends built a binary computer out of 10,000 Tinkertoy pieces. It could beat all comers at tic-tac-toe.

    Damn, think it could win a thermo-nuclear war against itself?

    1. Re:This guy IS a genius! by misterpies · · Score: 1


      Probably. It have must been pretty smart to always win at a game where it's mathematically proven that it's always possible to force a draw. Either that or MIT students are better at building computers than playing tic-tac-toe.

      --
      The author of this post asserts his moral rights.
  60. Brian Eno Did an Album for This by Nova+Express · · Score: 2, Informative
    Brian Eno did an album for this project: January 07003 | Bell Studies For The Clock Of The Long Now. I heard this at Bruce Sterling's house a couple of years ago, then went out and bought a copy. It's interesting in the usual, low-key Brian Eno way. And the proceeds benefit the project.

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

    1. Re:Brian Eno Did an Album for This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, when I was at Bruce Sterling's house, he said you're just a name-dropping, two-timing, no-good karma whore.

  61. Will it actually keep running by SlightOverdose · · Score: 1

    While the clock's designed to theoretically keep 10,000 years worth of time accurately, will it actually last that long? If the large version could be engineered well enough to still be running in 10,000 years time with minimal maintanance, it would be an excellent momument to future generations.

    In 10,000 years time there will probably be little else left of our era, and something like this could make the difference between this period being known for war and polution or being known for amazing increases in technology and engineering.

    Just imagine- One day this thing could be placed amongst the statue of liberty and the pyramids of giza as wonders of the ancient world!

  62. You've just scratched the surface by ianscot · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It isn't necessarily a feature list you're really pining for. If the current makers of alarm clocks added the stuff you want, they'd do so with 12 extra incomprehensible little plastic buttons, all of which would be tucked in back of the clock and all of which would look and feel the same. The volume control would be a wheel exactly like the tuning control on the radio, with one on the left side and one on the right, and you'd always have to re-learn which was which.

    What's needed is some thoughtful design.

    Alarm clocks are a prime example of a product in which the inmates are running the asylum. Each new half-baked feature clock makers add gets appended in the clunkiest possible way. These things aren't designed around the user, they're made according to the specs of the parts.

    The gold standard for our new design will be: I must be able to operate the clock's basic features when I wake up in the morning, blurry-headed and without my contacts in. This basic problem -- that they're used by sleepy people -- seems to have escaped current makers of alarm clocks.

    None of this has anything to do with "long time" though, not any more than with atomic clocks. (One of the obvious, obvious features of a decent alarm clock being that it'll synch with the atomic clocks and get back on track after a power outage or whatever...)

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    1. Re:You've just scratched the surface by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The gold standard for our new design will be: I must be able to operate the clock's basic features when I wake up in the morning, blurry-headed and without my contacts in. This basic problem -- that they're used by sleepy people -- seems to have escaped current makers of alarm clocks.

      One could also make a point for a design where it is hard to stop the alarm when you are not completely awake. This would reduce your risk of just falling asleep again after cancelling the alarm.
      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:You've just scratched the surface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be happy if I could simply find an alarm clock loud enough to wake me.

    3. Re:You've just scratched the surface by UltimateRobotLover · · Score: 1

      I always thought that having to complete a quick Simon game on the top of the clock before the alarm can be shut off would be good.

    4. Re:You've just scratched the surface by StopSayingYouSir · · Score: 1
      I always thought that having to complete a quick Simon game on the top of the clock before the alarm can be shut off would be good.

      Alarm clock: Beep.
      Me: *pulls plug*

    5. Re:You've just scratched the surface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alarm clock: Continues beeping using its backup battery, and won't let you shut it off until it's plugged back in. >:P

    6. Re:You've just scratched the surface by khallow · · Score: 1

      Me: *Pounds clock with minisledge hammer kept by the bed for this purpose* Clock: *the hidden, titanium encased AI robotic unit senses danger, jumps off the bureau, and hides under the bed, still BEEPING* Me: ... Me: Ok, I'm awake now. So how do I turn this thing off?

    7. Re:You've just scratched the surface by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      oh man, that is such a funny idea

      I think it might be more effective if it only made you beat Simon once in a while. If sometimes it shut off when you hit the sleep button, but other times required that you pass a Simon test, then you'll be thinking about it.

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
    8. Re:You've just scratched the surface by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      There was an article posted here a couple months back about an alarm clock that would jump off the table and run around the room...you pretty much have to be awake to find it, catch it and turn it off.

      As for operating a clock's basic features when one wakes up, I have a Timex indiglo radio alarm clock that is shaped like half a cheese wheel with a flat top. Even when I'm incredibly groggy, I can manipulate its *two* separate alarms, ie. turning them off or even changing the alarm times while I'm half asleep. The indiglo face helps me see what I'm doing in the dark without being overly bright (which is adjustable, too).

    9. Re:You've just scratched the surface by richy+freeway · · Score: 2, Informative
      A little bit like this then...

      Clocky!

    10. Re:You've just scratched the surface by spinkham · · Score: 1
      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
    11. Re:You've just scratched the surface by wasme · · Score: 1

      Ok, this reply is coming so late that nobody will ever look at it, but ...

      I used to agree that all alarm clocks sucked, but then I found a good one a couple years ago from RCA. Model number RP3711A, which, oddly enough, I can't find a picture of anywhere on the web. It's not listed on RCA's website either - the closest looking model currently avaliable seems to be the RP3720, which looks like a bit of a step back towards the 'cluster all the little buttons together rather than sanely spacing them out and making them large and easy to find when sleepy'.

      Anyway, the RP3771A isn't perfect, but its by far the best alarm clock I've used. For one thing it has a nice big clock display that I can actually read when I wake up, before I put on my glasses. It also has some nice big buttons for common controls (snooze, changing the station, a fairly big volume wheel). The alarm is nice and loud to :) Etc. Etc. As I said, its not perfect. It still has a few too many features and buttons for my tastes. Also, the speaker is in the back (mostly, it seems, in order to make the clock display bigger, and that's a good thing), so the sound is pointed in the wrong direction, but that's a minor complaint really, and a demonstration that all designs involve compromise.

      Anyway, my point, believe it or not, is not to pitch a clock radio/alarm clock that appears to be no longer in production, but rather to point out that if you look long and hard enough you do find products with semi-sane designs. If more people did that, rather then settling on the first thing they see at walmart, then companies would have more incentive to spend more time creating better designs.

    12. Re:You've just scratched the surface by khallow · · Score: 1

      A little like my idea, but with better formating and less violence! :-)

  63. One odd quirk w/ this computer-clock by Ingolfke · · Score: 1

    For some reason you have to press 'Execute' on an attached terminal every 108 minutes or... something catasrophic will happen.

  64. Hmm by carguy84 · · Score: 0

    Sounds very Lost ish.

  65. a waste? by Festering+Leper · · Score: 1

    Many people are completely uninterested. They think it's nonsense, a waste of time

    i'm sure he could figure out exactly how much time he wasted..

    --
    if you want people to think you know what you are talking about, just put ".com" at the end of everything you say.com
  66. Re:Star field accurate? Why no modern tech.? by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

    You obviously didn't read the arcticle. In the event of societal collapse the creator wants it to be serviceable with Bronze Age technology. An LCD display is most decidedly *not* Bronze Age tech.

    Try again, better luck next time.

  67. Re:Star field accurate? Why no modern tech.? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Why doesnt the clock have an LCD display?

    Do you really think an LCD display will last 10000 years? BTW, it would go against the project goals (which is not to impress future visitors). As the article states, the clock shall be understandable without taking it apart.
    It seems like they used lame tech. Sure they demonstrate some knowledge of analog mechanical computing ability .. but this ability has been around since the forties .. before the space age.

    The point is not a technology demonstration. The point is to alter the thinking of the people about long time spans.
    We want humans of the future to know that we understood that the stars themselves are moving (ie, certain stars would no longer have the same relative positions in the sky ..example: Barnard's star is moving at 10.3 arcseconds per year against the background. We want to show we have that knowledge ..

    Again, the project isn't about teaching future people about our knowledge, it's about teaching current people to think long term. However, I could imagine that the star movement would be a great tool for that. Assuming those 10.3 arcseconds per year will not change in the future (and neither the direction), in 10000 years it will have moved about 28.6 degrees. This is indeed a quite visible difference. Of course, if the clock should track the movements of the stars as well, its price might grow from exorbitant to unaffordable ...
    Heck even include a copy of Wikipedia on HD DVD in a simplified binary format without any complicated enoding scheme.

    I bet that in 10000 years any HD-DVD produced today will be completely unreadable.
    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  68. Finally...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A clock that is capable of recording the exact time in the future when I eventually get laid!! Thank you science.

    1. Re:Finally...... by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1

      No it won't, it's only designed to run 10,000 years.

  69. Magnetic Switch by AUsBandit · · Score: 1

    I remember reading somewhere that the Earth flips its magnetic polls every 100,000 years or so. The article also said we were close to a switch relativly, within 10,000 years of one. If that is true then how can this clock be acurate at that time? Wouldn't a flip in the magnetic polls change the wobble of the earth a bit?

    On top of all that how close to thier magnetic switch are the other planets it is keeping track of?

  70. Some ideas? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Most what left of is are some ruins and some idea's

    I suppose if you want to include the Latin alphabet and language, and the books that formed the cornerstone of Western civilization until the Renaissance, with deep enough cultural resonance that pretty much every eastern European nation used a mangled form (Kaizer, Czar) of Caesar to describe their rulers, in the set of "some ideas", then you might be right. What would count as the Romans leaving their mark? A centurion on every street corner?

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  71. Daylight saving time by autolycos · · Score: 1

    Is it George-Bush-meddling-with-daylight-saving-time proof?

  72. Re:Star field accurate? Why no modern tech.? by LS · · Score: 1

    Ok, so are you going to finance the design and manufacture of LCDs and DVDs that last more than 20 years? That could cost billions of dollars, and I think it's out of the realm of this project.

    LS

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  73. Something Equally Impressive by Comatose51 · · Score: 1
    The clock is very impressive but also check out John Harrison. He built extremely accurate chronometers a few centuries ago that are still running today. His inventions helped solve one of the biggest navigational/technological/scientific problem of his time. The book is an excellent light read.

    One of his clocks was made of wood and he used wood that produced a natural lubricant so it needs no maintenance at all. It is STILL running.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  74. Nitpicks a plenty: by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 0, Troll
    "designed to run for 10,000 years". Well, no. The article kinda suggests but never quite states that they don't have any idea what material is gonna work for 10,000 years. Without wearing out, corroding, sticking, galling, spalling, pitting, grooving, and all the other things time does to materials.

    And they don't have a power source either.

    And obviously even if it gets "designed", there's no way to actually test it. There will be functions that are only exercised every 4,000 years, so those parts will be mighty hard to test under realistic conditions. How do you design a mechanical flip-flop that has to sit still for 4,000 years, then flip?

    And they apparently don't have a good time reference! No atomic clock, as they tend to run out of cesium atoms after a few years. It's apparently meant to be locked to the Sun, but that's not a particularly *good* clock. Even now we have to occasionally add a leap-second to keep roughly in sync with the Sun. And locking to the Sun is problematical, as the Earths' axis precesses a bit, changing local noon on a roughly 18,000 year cycle.

    So not to put too fine a point on it, should we really be impressed by a very sketchy design, and very partial prototype, for a useless, marketless, and probably unbuildable gadget that won't tell time all that well anyway?

    1. Re:Nitpicks a plenty: by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1
      Well, maybe the true plan is slightly different anyway: From http://www.longnow.org/projects/clock/
      The fate of really old things leads me to think that the clock should be copied and hidden. The idea of hiding the clock to preserve it has a natural corollary, but it takes Teller, the professional magician, to suggest it without shame: "The important thing is to make a very convincing documentary about building the clock and hiding it. Don't actually build one. That would spoil the myth if it was ever found." In a way, Teller is right.

      Well, it doesn't state that this is the real plan, but then, if it did, then it would be counter-productive to the plan, wouldn't it? :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  75. Support in 10000 years by sita · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The real question is support. Will the manufacturer still be around in 3,000 years when you need to replace the little rubber feet? Are vendors and repair centers going to stock replacement parts? How much does an extended warranty cost?

    This is so ontopic! This is the one overshadowing design criterion. It should be possible to repair with whatever technology is available in 10000 years. And you can't rely on manuals, since you don't even know what languages there will be 10000 years down the road.

  76. DON'T START IT! by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

    ...and while everyone talks about slowing down, one clever soul is going to stop. Stop time, that is. For good. Going against everything known (and nine-tenths of everything that remains unknown), a young horologist has been commissioned to build the world's first truly accurate clock. It falls to History Monk Lu-Tze and his apprentice Lobsang Ludd to find the timepiece and stop it before it starts. For if the Perfect Clock starts ticking, Time - as we know it - will stop. And then the trouble will really begin...

    - Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time

  77. Binary computers use gears! by scottdunn · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Is the author trying to pull one over on us?
    Everything about this clock is deeply unusual. For example, while nearly every mechanical clock made in the last millennium consists of a series of propelled gears, this one uses a stack of mechanical binary computers capable of singling out one moment in 3.65 million days
    Binary computers use gears...
    1. Re:Binary computers use gears! by njh · · Score: 1

      If you had actually read the article you would know that his design doesn't use gears, instead using some kind of pin in slot mechanism that doesn't change ratios as it wears. There are incidental gears for the display, but these don't affect the time keeping.

  78. Don't forget John Harrison by drfunch · · Score: 1

    Although the work of Daniel Hillis and his team is extremely interesting, much more impressive is the tale and contribution of English clock designer John Harrison.

  79. 10000 years eh? by Malluck · · Score: 1

    I'm finding this hard to believe.
    Lets see what math has to say about this.

    10000 years between failures or a failure every 10000 years.
    Lets say there are 100 critical parts that make up this clock.
    That means each part needs to have an average operational lifespan of million years.

    This assumes that there is no redundancy incorperated into the system, and there may be, but it's not obvious from the pictures.

    I'm also wondering how this clock is powered. If it's purely mechanically powered, then 10,000 years may be possible. I doubt any electrical system can last that long without some serious over engineering (electrolytics dry out, motor bushes wear, wire insulation degrades, silicon dopants migrate).

  80. Daylight Savings Time by Ginnungagap42 · · Score: 1

    It'll work great until Congress changes Daylight Savings Time yet again...

    1. Re:Daylight Savings Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking the exact same thing. All it takes is one wacky congress-person(had to be pc, something's wrong with me), and the effort to make this clock is ka-blooooieeeee!!

  81. Something seems to be missing... by Solonas · · Score: 1

    I may have missed it when reading the article, but what drives this super clock? If its mechanical, I will assume that its going to rely on some sort of kinetic/potential energy transition, but I don't see a pendulum or a power source, nor can I think of one that will last 10,000 years.

    1. Re:Something seems to be missing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Photovoltaic Solar?

      No, the panels will degrade within a few decades, tops.

      Wind power?

      Not likely that you could build moving parts able to handle the stress for a hundred years.

      Radioisotope thermoelectric generator? (RTG)

      Maybe, but to last 10,000 years you will need to use an isotope with a comparatively long halflife, and so the RTG will need a fairly large volume. And your power requirements will need to be pretty modest.

    2. Re:Something seems to be missing... by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

      I may have missed it when reading the article, but what drives this super clock? If its mechanical, I will assume that its going to rely on some sort of kinetic/potential energy transition, but I don't see a pendulum or a power source, nor can I think of one that will last 10,000 years.

      I must admit I forget myself, but if you go to the Website Of The Clock:

      http://www.longnow.org/

      you will find writings on a prototype discussing this very problem and various possibilities for powering it.

      Looks like they redid the website since I was there last, the main clock page is here:

      http://www.longnow.org/projects/clock/

      Here are some of the details on possible power sources and other design decisions:

      http://www.longnow.org/projects/clock/principles/

      --
      Tag lost or not installed.
    3. Re:Something seems to be missing... by glider0524 · · Score: 1

      If I remember reading the article right a few days ago in the magazine, I believe it mentions some sort of memory-shifting metal that reacts to heat. He can expose a coil of the stuff to the sun so when heated up during the day, the coil would wind itself up. Possibly he could use a large magnifying glass to get the temperature up high enough. During night when the temp goes down it would unwind and thus drive the clock. Alternating coils mechanically exposed to the sun on alternating days would keep the mechanics going for some time. Memory metal has a very high fatigue resistance. Memory metal info here).

      --
      In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, however, there is. -Berra
    4. Re:Something seems to be missing... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      In the article they discussed a bunch of methods that might be used, but overall it didn't sound like they had decided on which one they're going to use in the final version yet, other than having a list of possibilities that ought to work. They did say though that the plan is to have some sort of constant power source that drives the automatic timekeeping parts of the clock, but then have the display driven by the actions of human viewers. Honestly that sounds very cool: it would keep time by itself from some sort of natural power source (or a variety of them, one assumes) but then when you walk into the altar / viewing room / whatever it would use your weight or heat to activate the display mechanism.

      The comment about the memory metal that's heated by the sun was not suggested in the article as a power source, but as a calibration / reset mechanism to keep the clock in sync to local solar time.

      I think this is a great project and I wish them all the best of luck -- however I do wonder if they're overbuilding it just a bit. It seems like you could do much the same thing by hollowing out a big chamber and drilling a hole in a wall, and then tracing patterns on the interior that would give the time and date as a function of the sun's image's movement. It's my understanding that some Egyptian monuments and tombs were built like that, and they currently have a pretty good track record in terms of longevity.

      But hey, that wouldn't be nearly as cool as a gigantic mechano-digital clock buried in a bunker in a hill somewhere.

      If this thing gets built and I ever have any reason to be in the general area, I'd go and see it.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    5. Re:Something seems to be missing... by arminw · · Score: 1

      ....but what drives this super clock?.....

      Atmospheric pressure variations. I read about a clock that is powered that way that was built in the 50s and was a for sale item. It used a pendulum to keep time. A clock such as the one in the article uses the force of gravity and the orbit of the earth as a time keeping basis. As such it can be accurate long term, because the equations of gravity contain no time containing variable units and are therefore long term stable.

      Atomic clocks, such as our national standards use atomic forces which do contain time units. (Planks constant) There is evidence that some of these "constants" are only stable for the relatively short human life times, but have drifted lower throughout the long ages of time and are still changing today. This means that "clocks" such as radioactive decays must also be corrected for this drift.

      --
      All theory is gray
    6. Re:Something seems to be missing... by munpfazy · · Score: 1

      Err.. huh?

      First of all, it's not clear that the Long Now people are planning to use atmospheric pressure variations for their clock. They point out explicitly on their website the drawback of such a system: you need close fitting moving mechanical parts, which means you need someone around with the skills and materials to replace them regularly. See http://www.longnow.org/projects/clock/principles/ for a list of what is currently being considered.

      Second, if alpha does change, it's revolutionary and very exciting - but it happens on timescales of billions of years. In 10'000 years, you'd never notice it. Laboratory limits on the variation of alpha are currently something something like 1/alpha * d(alpha)/dt 2e-16 /yr.

      If your atomic clock frequency scales as alpha^2/h (as the cesium hyperfine transition does, to lowest order) and you suspect h is the part of alpha that changes, then you're "off" by less than a second after 10'000 years. (I put the word off in quotes because at present we've chosen to define time based on the cesium clock itself, so it you want to be pedantic about it a cesium clock is perfectly accurate and it's the gravitating objects and other clocks that are off.) At the moment, you can't actually build an atomic clock that's good to more than about 1 part in 10^15 on the ground anyway.

      There's no mechanical or gravitational system that we can measure to anywhere near that accuracy. If your goal was the best accuracy possible, you'd be well advised to use an atomic clock, even if you intend to keep it running forever.

      The reason Long Now isn't building an atomic clock is that you need someone around who is able and willing to maintain it in order to keep it running. They aren't the sort of thing you can stick in a mountain and expect to come back and find it still going after a few centuries of neglect. Even if you were confident that there would be a group of people with enough technical knowhow around to maintain the thing forever and some way to pay for their keep, you'd still have to create a huge stockpile of spare parts. The thing becomes a prime target for either looting or abandonment.

      The Long Now project aims to build a clock that can be forgotten for a century and then repaired by someone with hand tools. That's why they clock is mechanical and corrects itself with a sundial.

    7. Re:Something seems to be missing... by BrianGKUAC · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but as per one of the goals of the project, you'd need something repairable with bronze age materials.

      --
      Menus: Linux=function, Windows=vendor, OS X=as little as possible. Makes a statement, don't you think?
    8. Re:Something seems to be missing... by arminw · · Score: 1

      ....to use atmospheric pressure variations....

      I know that such variations can and have been used to power a clock, but whether a mechanism can be built that utilizes this and also lasts for 10K or so years is another thing entirely. I don't believe than *anything* man-made can last that long, even if only subjected to "natural" deterioration through the laws of entropy.

      (....Laboratory limits on the variation of alpha....)

      Just because we can measure somthing in the lab NOW doesn't mean that it was not greatly different in the past. Most processes in nature are non-linear. In the past, many cherished notions of scientific "truth" finally collapsed under the weight of accumulating evidence in spite of dogmatic opposition from the then existing scientific esablishment. The mounting evidence that some of the so called fundamental "constants" are far from constant is still being hotly denied because it has some very unsettling implications to the established world view concerning the assumptions and methods used to determine the age of things.

      If you are interested to find out more, you can begin here:

      http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTI CLE_ID=39733

      Clocks based on the atom are great and incredibly accurate for short term stuff, like the GPS and our even normal appointment calendars, but on really long time scales appear to be subject to drift against the clocks based on gravity.

      --
      All theory is gray
  82. And yet... by Dracolytch · · Score: 0, Redundant

    How much do you want to bet that when you loose power, the damn thing still flashes 12:00 like every cheap VCR on the planet?

    ~D

    --
    This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
  83. take 10,000 years to build it by peter303 · · Score: 1

    This idea was started over a decade ago by technologist Danny Hillis. Though they have a design and site, its been really slow getting off the ground.

  84. Finally, a clock for Yucca Mountain! by Speare · · Score: 1

    So slap a foolproof alarm device with language-agnostic hieroglyphics on there and you can finally tell the Beings of the Distant Future whether or not it is safe to enter the area around Yucca Mountain.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  85. Since I could not RTFA by Holi · · Score: 1

    I have to wonder if this has anything to do with the the Long Now Foundation.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  86. Wish list by pjcreath · · Score: 1
    I've always wished that someone would build a cheap IP-enabled clock. I know of the SoundBridge Radio, but it's gigantic and has a terrible display for use as a bedside alarm clock. (And it's not cheap.)

    Things that are missing from existing IP-enabled devices:

    1. Small (fits on a small bedside table), but with large numbers (legible in the middle of the night).
    2. A proper color display for bedside use (e.g. not blue).
    3. A dimmable display.
    4. Large, distinct (by touch) buttons for control when your eyes are closed.

    Things that are missing from alarm clocks:

    1. NTP time synchronization. Not everybody can get WWVB.
    2. Audio streaming. I get terrible radio reception, and I hate waking up to commercials.
    3. Configurable UI. If it's a real embedded device, you can tweak the buttons' behavior if you think the UI is dumb. (I don't care if this is difficult, as long as it's possible.)
    4. Configurable behavior. If it doesn't have the feature you need (like those in the parent), you can add it.

    Other niceties:

    1. Battery back-up. Yes, there are still some clocks that don't have it. Of course, streaming would be difficult with no power, so it should have a piezo buzzer as a backup.
    2. Power over Ethernet. Fewer cords, less risk of killing yourself when you knock over your glass of water at 3 in the morning. Probably cheaper than going wireless.
  87. Doesn't this show that it's doing the job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is old, from 1996. Obviously. Yet, the fact that Slashdot and Discover magazine are just now running a few articles, doesn't that show that the clock is doing its job?

    Yes, it does have to keep accurate time -- that's one for the engineers. However, there is a psychological factor involved with the whole event. Even now we see that we're interested in this project, but it wasn't a very recent event. I doubt many people were interested in '96, yet there seems to be a larger "user base" so to speak. We don't actually care right now what time it says it is because we have kept clocks, yet we are still interested in the theatrics.

    Seems to be working to me.
    Instead of going all googly-eyed over the clock, how about you go off and maintain/increase productivity? The clock is meant to force(?) people to think in terms of the "long now". Not just you, your life, or your children's lives, but the future (about 10,000 years according to the Long Now Foundation).

  88. Is it noon? by jmichaelg · · Score: 2, Informative
    How will we know it is keeping accurate time if nothing else is as accurate to check it against?

    Local noon is an easy time to measure. When the sun is due south, it's local noon. Due south is halfway between local sunrise and local sunset. If the clock were to drift, it would be saying something like "it's two oclock" whereas the sun would be telling you it was local noon so you'd know the clock was wrong. The clock is designed to reset itself based on the position of the sun using a bimetallic strip so unless it breaks completely, it should keep time.

    The bigger problem to my eyes is they're planning on tucking it hell and gone inside a mountain so no one will steal or vandalize it. For a monument that is intended as a statement of hope for the future, that strikes me as counter productive. "Umm, we built this thing for you kids whom we've never met but we figure you're not trustworthy enough to let you know where it is."

    The architects in the middle ages trusted their offspring to finish and maintain the cathedrals that the architects laid the foundations for. Seems that turned out ok - most of the cathedrals are still here and don't show signs of being stolen or vandalized. Even the Germans had the good sense to leave Paris alone during both wars and they're the original Vandals.

    Put it in the desert to keep it free from humidity but don't go and hide the damn thing. Kind of defeats the idea.

    1. Re:Is it noon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The comparison between a cathedral and this monument clock is a bit flawed. Cathedrals were a part of Europeans daily (or at least weekly) life. Moreover, they were seen as temples for God. It is only natural that the people would protect a cathedral from vandalism.

      A better comparison would be an "Eternal flame" versus the clock. I base this comparison on two things: (1) An eternal flame is designed to last a long time. (2) People tend to not feel any particular attachment to an eternal flame. We all know how permanent those are.

    2. Re:Is it noon? by cornjchob · · Score: 1

      The bigger problem to my eyes is they're planning on tucking it hell and gone inside a mountain so no one will steal or vandalize it. For a monument that is intended as a statement of hope for the future, that strikes me as counter productive. "Umm, we built this thing for you kids whom we've never met but we figure you're not trustworthy enough to let you know where it is."

      According to the article, they will be assigning a caretaker to ensure those things--they're tucking it hell and gone inside a mountain because if they put it on display in a populated center like New York, London, Tokyo, or where ever that defeats the purpose of their mission. They want people to start thinking into the future, to get away from this "ADD" riddled short-attention spanned world. There's no better way to clear the mind than a day's walk, especially if you only know a generic location. However judging by the article, they'll probably offer more than a generic location. But the point remains: putting the clock in a human population center will defeat its purpose by cheapening its goals due to what's around it. Plus, cities get bombed, moved, etc--where he plans on putting it, there's much less of a chance it will be destroyed in those manners. Always a chance for "someone with an axe to grind against time itself", as another poster put it, to go and blow the thing up--but nothing like if it were in LA or Sydney or something.

      --
      We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
    3. Re:Is it noon? by jmichaelg · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Putting it in the desert is fine - there's less humidity so maintenance will not be as bad as putting it near the sea or in a humid city. It's just that hiding it far up some inaccessible gulch defeats the point of the machine. For 99.99999999% of the population, it may as well not exist. Unless of course, it's only being built for the .000000001% then hell and gone is a dandy location.

      There's another drawback you're missing. If civilisation collapses, there isn't going to be a caretaker for projects that only 1 in a 100 million people have seen. Whereas if it's a place where you take your kids so they can see a place that their great^200-grandfolks left them a big hello in the guest book, society as a whole might ensures it survives whatever comes down the pike. My sons' mother descends from the family that built the oldest standing house in the United States. The boys' names are in a guest book waiting for them to come see the house some day and sign the spot in the book that's waiting for them. Chances are they'll do it when they have kids of their own and can put their kid's names into the book. This has been going on since the house was built some 400 years ago. Granted, that's only 4% of 10,000 years, but I suspect that as long as the house endures, so will the tradition. The house endures, not because of the descendants, but because lots of people are interested in old houses and are willing to see to their upkeep.

    4. Re:Is it noon? by dajak · · Score: 3, Informative

      The architects in the middle ages trusted their offspring to finish and maintain the cathedrals that the architects laid the foundations for. Seems that turned out ok - most of the cathedrals are still here and don't show signs of being stolen or vandalized. Even the Germans had the good sense to leave Paris alone during both wars and they're the original Vandals.

      You are wrong. Most cathedrals are no longer there. Most cathedrals collapsed within two centuries after being built, and many others will collapse within 50 years because of car traffic.

      You are also wrong about the Germans. A number of old inner cities and over 200 medieval castles in my country (the Netherlands) were destroyed beyond repair by the Germans in the 4 days we fought them. Paris was saved because it wasn't fought over. Still the Germans are not more destructive than our other neighbours. Overall they are our most peaceful neighbours.

      The town I live in now was for instance razed and flooded by the sea in 1350 in a civil war, and razed again in 1572 by a Spanish army, who also murdered the entire population. It was rebuilt in 1574 with strong city walls and shelled again in the same year by the Spanish. It was shelled by the French in 1672, and by our own army liberating it in 1673. Last time it was shelled was again by our own side in 1814, after Napoleon lost the battle of Leipzig, and the French garrison refused to surrender to Dutch militia claiming the town.

      The town I grew up in was destroyed by the English fleet in 1809. The inner city was largely destroyed again in 1940 and in 1945, when the Allies also flooded it by bombing the dikes. Sources also recount that the town was razed to the ground twice in the middle ages by the Flemish because of our excessive river tolls.

      It is really just a fluke that some buildings survived over the centuries, and generally speaking it is the best buildings that survive.

    5. Re:Is it noon? by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 2, Informative
      The bigger problem to my eyes is they're planning on tucking it hell and gone inside a mountain so no one will steal or vandalize it. For a monument that is intended as a statement of hope for the future, that strikes me as counter productive. "Umm, we built this thing for you kids whom we've never met but we figure you're not trustworthy enough to let you know where it is."
      The idea, according to the article, is not that people won't know where it is--just that it's hard enough to get to that it won't become so familiar that people no longer care about it. Seems reasonable to me. Now it is possible people will forget where it is....
    6. Re:Is it noon? by NearlyHeadless · · Score: 1
      The architects in the middle ages trusted their offspring to finish and maintain the cathedrals that the architects laid the foundations for. Seems that turned out ok - most of the cathedrals are still here and don't show signs of being stolen or vandalized. Even the Germans had the good sense to leave Paris alone during both wars and they're the original Vandals.
      ...

      You are also wrong about the Germans. A number of old inner cities and over 200 medieval castles in my country (the Netherlands) were destroyed beyond repair by the Germans in the 4 days we fought them. Paris was saved because it wasn't fought over. Still the Germans are not more destructive than our other neighbours. Overall they are our most peaceful neighbours.

      Also, Hitler ordered Paris to be destroyed and many explosives were placed but never detonated because Dietrich von Choltitz did not follow the orders from Hitler, risking reprisals against his family back in Germany. Paris was saved. There is a gripping book "Is Paris Burning?", as well as a movie by the same name that I haven't seen.
    7. Re:Is it noon? by freeweed · · Score: 1

      It frightens me just how much violence Europe has experienced over the centuries. Considering how relatively peaceful North America has been for the past century or so, it REALLY frightens me to imagine the US finally becoming a bit too aggressive towards its northern neighbour.

      If I learn nothing else from history, it's to be afraid of the future.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    8. Re:Is it noon? by dajak · · Score: 1

      Also, Hitler ordered Paris to be destroyed and many explosives were placed but never detonated because Dietrich von Choltitz did not follow the orders from Hitler, risking reprisals against his family back in Germany. Paris was saved. There is a gripping book "Is Paris Burning?", as well as a movie by the same name that I haven't seen.

      Yes. I remember I read that. Hitler certainly was very destructive in his last days. Run of the mill destruction usually happens for a good reason, though.

      I do have the impression that as a general rule capitals are less often destroyed because the elite tends to live in the capital and surrenders when it is under threat, while other towns are supposed to let themselves get shelled for the fatherland.

    9. Re:Is it noon? by dajak · · Score: 1

      It frightens me just how much violence Europe has experienced over the centuries. Considering how relatively peaceful North America has been for the past century or so, it REALLY frightens me to imagine the US finally becoming a bit too aggressive towards its northern neighbour.

      You're being far too optimistic. The US fighting Canada is so unfair that part of the US will certainly join Canada: with evenly matched sides you get a longer war and far more destruction. People instinctively like the underdog when the sides are very uneven.

      If I learn nothing else from history, it's to be afraid of the future.

      It's not history that repeats itself. It's people. The role of history itself isn't clear: sometimes it is the accurate recollection of the grudges of the previous war that causes the next one, and sometimes it is rosy legend of previous wars that makes people so naive to think they can get into one and get away with it unscathed.

      On the other hand, Rome and some other superpowers have demonstrated that it is perfectly possible for some to get away with centuries of peace at home and war abroad before vengeance is served by Vandals, Huns, Goths, Lombards etc. ;)

    10. Re:Is it noon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're being far too optimistic. The US fighting Canada is so unfair that part of the US will certainly join Canada: with evenly matched sides you get a longer war and far more destruction. People instinctively like the underdog when the sides are very uneven.

      Thanks for the laugh
    11. Re:Is it noon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone else find it pretty hilarious to hear an American talk about a building built 400 years ago as if it were really old?

    12. Re:Is it noon? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      The bigger problem to my eyes is they're planning on tucking it hell and gone inside a mountain so no one will steal or vandalize it. For a monument that is intended as a statement of hope for the future, that strikes me as counter productive. "Umm, we built this thing for you kids whom we've never met but we figure you're not trustworthy enough to let you know where it is."

      The architects in the middle ages trusted their offspring to finish and maintain the cathedrals that the architects laid the foundations for. Seems that turned out ok - most of the cathedrals are still here and don't show signs of being stolen or vandalized.

      That's because the kids of those architects had something that kids today and for the near future don't. Standards, morals, ethics, faith...
    13. Re:Is it noon? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      You really ought to study some history some day.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  89. Future Proof??? by jjp5421 · · Score: 1

    Untill the darn metric time standard is ratified...

  90. Duracells or Energizer Bunny? by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    Hmm, so which one is powering it? I would be more interested in the design of the 10,000 year power supply than the clock.

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  91. Nice by squoozer · · Score: 1

    but I wouldn't like to try wearing it on my wrist.

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
  92. Daylight savings time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every time I hear about a mechanical / atomic clock to be supremely accurate, I have to wonder, what about daylight savings time? what about leap years? leap seconds?

    http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05210/545823.stm

    http://www.leaphour.com/

    http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/time/leap/

    unless either:

    1) The world (not just the US) completely and finally breaks ther link between astronomical events and time, or
    2) Atomic clocks are programmed to comprehend astronomical events such as sunrise / sunset, variances in the length in solar years, and others,

    Then the next finder of this wonder may be as lost as to its real function and meaning as we are about stonehinge.

    One may assume that civilization constantly marches forward technologically, but that one must explain why the ancient Romans had flush toilets when the American settlers did not.

    1. Re:Daylight savings time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA

  93. Hah! by handmedowns · · Score: 1

    It'll never survive the Bush administration!

    --
    The road between democracy and tyranny is paved with secrecy in the name of security.
  94. Touching, Moving, and Thought Provoking by duerra · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This article is amazing. It really moved me. The concepts and level that the people involved in this are thinking on really makes a person stop to consider how thoughtless we are today to our culture and the impact that we have on not only ourselves and the rest of the world in the here and now, but how such an idea can be a profound testiment to the achievements of the human race for generations long after we're gone.

    I see so many jokes, rants, and condemnations from people responding to this here on Slashdot, and it becomes immediately clear that these people have not read the article, and if they have, are completely shallow and selfish people.

    There is so much meaning and thought that has gone into this that it's unspeakable to even consider anything but full support for this project. I want my place in time to have a reflection to civilizations thousands of years from now. The human race in the past no doubt realized the significance of speaking to future generations... why are we so thoughtless?

  95. $20 bucks.... plus tax by TheDrewbert · · Score: 1

    This watch shows the time, the day, the date, the year and the altitude. It is so hard to read because one hand is missing and you can't tell if it's the little one or the big one. That's why today is Saturday the 94th of February.... 1610, B.C. Last Wednesday was Easter Sunday on this watch and after dinner my neighbor came over and distributed Christmas gifts..... because he also has one of these watches.

    --
    http://www.CelloFourteGroupie.net
  96. Re:Star field accurate? Why no modern tech.? by TheGavster · · Score: 1

    In 10 thousand years, do you think an LCD will be any more impressive than a mechanical dial? The 40-year difference in tech in insignificant compared to the projected life cycle of this thing. The whole point is to make people realize the vastness of time.

    --
    "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
  97. Maybe this is the clock.... by lcde · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That John Titor will need for time travel. :)

    --
    :%s/teh/the/g
  98. but does it handle by plopez · · Score: 1

    daylight savings time?

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  99. hm by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    (Genius)+(Wealth)+(Too Little To Do) = CLOCK THAT WILL RUN FOR 10,000 YEARS! W00T!

    Alternative: place stick in vertically in the ground in the dark.*

    When you can see the shadow = morning
    When the shadow is the shortest during the day = noon
    When you can't see the shadow anymore = sunset
    Interpolate other times as needed.
    Bonus weather detection capability: if the stick is wet, it's probably raining. If the stick has fallen over, it's windy. If the stick is moving, earthquake or landslide. If you can't see the stick, fog or heavy snow.


    * if you think I'm being facetious, well, I am. But IIRC from TFA in Wired, his superclock has a 'precisely' angled lens that uses solar heating to heat a metal strip that acts as a correction mechanism...i.e. it's correcting for local noon daily, ala a frikken stick in the ground.

    --
    -Styopa
  100. what about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does it predict massive earth tilting earthquakes, or violent magnetic polar shifts, or acts of God? if not, i like skagen watches. they're so flat!

  101. I know a clock that's been running for 3500 years by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1
    I know a clock that's been running for 3500 years. In fact, in a week or so, we wind it with a beautiful ceremony. Millions of people around the world will participate in the winding of this clock, and similar numbers meet several times a week to read its instructions, and wind it throughout the year.

    It is, of course, the Torah!

    I used to work with Hillis when I was at Walt Disney Imagineering, R&D down in Glendale. And I mentioned to him that his 10,000 year clock sounded religious in nature...you needed a cult around it to maintain it with regular ceremonies, etc. Of course, I mentioned the fact that the Jews already had one that has successfully run ever since Moses received the Torah at Mt. Sinai, several thousand years ago. Hillis just stared at me like I wasn't making sense.

  102. Ah, but... by Snafoo · · Score: 1

    But can it predict future revolutions?

    (Today is Octidi, le 38 Vendémiaire, Année 214 de la République, to you monarchist imperialist bastards!)

    --
    - undoware.ca
  103. Changes in U.S. Daylight Time by lildogie · · Score: 1

    Does it take into account the whims of the U.S. Congress on Daylight time?

  104. Brian Eno's talk on The Long Now by six11 · · Score: 1
    For those of you who do not know, or did not read the article, the clock is a project of The Long Now Foundation. A friend of mine hipped me to this earlier this year. I listened to a recording of Brian Eno giving his talk on why he is involved in the project, and how he came to give it it's name. This seriously is one of the things that stand out to me in the past ten years as changing how I look at things. I highly, highly recommend listening to it--you can read it in PDF or Word format, but I really recommend listening to it. Just chill out for an hour or so and let it sink in. You'll thank yourself for doing it.

    http://seminars.longnow.org/

  105. Lets put one at Mount Rushmore by floormasn56 · · Score: 1

    In the Hall of Records. But set it like it started at July 4 1776.

  106. My Clock Has Been Running for 5 Billion Years+ by aquatone282 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's called "the sun."

    I think it's got another 5 billion or so years left on it, too.

    --
    What?
  107. Re:Boring old news, even older than that by antispam_ben · · Score: 2, Informative

    Readers of Wired Magazine (both of them!) have known about this since 1995. Go to this page and scroll down to "The Millennium Clock/An essay by Danny Hillis from 01995" They were already Y10K compliant ten years ago!
    http://www.longnow.org/projects/clock/

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
  108. Re:I know a clock that's been running for 3500 yea by Travis+Fisher · · Score: 1

    I would have thought that Hillis would have easily understood a massively parallel distributed implementation of a clock, even if it is completely virtualized.

  109. A clock that keeps accurate time for 10K years? by thewiz · · Score: 1

    It's about time!

    --
    If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
  110. And it shall be called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THE EARTH! Oh wait...

  111. What about world shaking events? by lotus_out_law · · Score: 1

    Like say a 9.6 earthquake, or a comet hitting earth...
    This changes the wobble of earth and so the time is in error after all ...

    I want my refund ...

    kR.\'

  112. Interesting Stuff by Ezmate · · Score: 5, Informative

    I stumbled across this project 5 years ago & was immediately in love. The scope of the project is amazing, the engineering that went into some of the pieces is incredible, and the final product (the first prototype) was gorgeous. I read everything I could about it & even had it as my wallpaper for a while. If you like mechanical devices, take some time to look at this project - it's well worth it!

    Currently, you can find the project's web page at http://www.longnow.org/projects/clock/

    The mechanical computer, the solar synchronizer, and the power mechanism are all very cool pieces of engineering. However, the most fascinating part of the entire clock is the "Equation of Time Cam". A bit more information about the cam follows.

    The proposed clock not only keeps accurate solar time (it resets itself every day at noon via the solar synchronizer), it also keeps accurate "clock time". How it does this is pretty amazing:

    In general, when the sun reaches its highest point ("solar noon"), you can look at your watch & find that it's not really noon. On any given day, the variation between "solar noon" & "clock noon" is +/- 15 minutes. Of course, this variation chanages through out the year, following a well defined curve known as the "equation of time" (http://www.sundials.co.uk/equation.htm) (it looks like a 5th order polynomial equation).

    So, when the mechanical clock resets itself at "solar noon", it's needs to account for this variation to determine "clock noon". One way to do this is to make a disc that is not perfectly round; it has a wider diameter at portions & a narrower diameter at other parts (something like a cross between a circle & an ameoba). This "disc" makes one revolution per year, and the variations in its diameter represent the difference between "solar noon" & "clock noon". So, at "solar noon", the clock resets itself & uses a feeler gauge on the disc to figure out how much variation to add or subtract to display "clock noon". So, assuming you have a sunny day every once & a while, you have a clock that will always have accurate clock time. Ingenious!

    There's a problem, though: each year, the equation of time changes slightly. So, in order to keep accurate clock time for 10,000 years, you need 10,000 of these discs, each representing the distinct equation of time for each year. The Long Now foundation solves this problem by making an "Equation of Time Cam" - a continous stack of these cylinders. In my mind it is a thing of beauty - engineering at its best - well thought out and so simple. Here's a picture of the cam - it's the cylinder that looks like it melted a bit:

    http://www.longnow.org/projects/clock/prototype1/i mages/general-EqOfTimeDtl1_00Lo.jpg

    The Long Now's explanation can be found here (complete with Cad drawings!):

    http://emsh.calarts.edu/~mathart/Clock_Cam.html

    I hope everyone enjoys this project as much as I have - Have fun!

    1. Re:Interesting Stuff by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

      ...
      There's a problem, though: each year, the equation of time changes slightly. So, in order to keep accurate clock time for 10,000 years, you need 10,000 of these discs, each representing the distinct equation of time for each year. The Long Now foundation solves this problem by making an "Equation of Time Cam" - a continous stack of these cylinders. In my mind it is a thing of beauty - engineering at its best - well thought out and so simple. Here's a picture of the cam - it's the cylinder that looks like it melted a bit:

      http://www.longnow.org/projects/clock/prototype1/i mages/general-EqOfTimeDtl1_00Lo.jpg [longnow.org]


      Aha, I see, each year it uses a different 'slice' of the cylinder. Well, as you say, it's not quite a cylinder. It actually looks like the stomach-and-hips area of a human female. I'm not projecting, am I?

      Perhaps future humans will see it and think "Oh, that's the shape of the most desirable female at the time this thing was built."

      --
      Tag lost or not installed.
    2. Re:Interesting Stuff by dajak · · Score: 1

      I stumbled across this project 5 years ago & was immediately in love.

      Me too. I stumbled accross the book "The Clock of the Long Now: Time and Responsibility" and bought it immediately.

      Now I think that either our society or the clock cannot last 10,000 years. Ever noticed that mankind's great monuments are in awful, deserted places? The answer to the question why occurred to me when I learned that Roman bricks were reused in the medieval castles in my area. No monument will survive the proximity of a thriving human society, and there are now more people around than ever before. Everything will be recycled at some point, including the clock. Using cheap materials will not work, because the very presence of the working clock will make its parts valuable in the future. Cheap is a very temporary thing. They better start working on the machine gun of the long now.

    3. Re:Interesting Stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, RTFA...

    4. Re:Interesting Stuff by nothings · · Score: 1
      For a project that's looking at 10,000 years, it's awfully short-sighted in other areas.

      The Clock's works consist of a binary digital-mechanical system which is so accurate and revolutionary that we have patented several of its elements.

      Woohoo, that patent is going to last for all of 20 years! Good job!

  113. Re:I know a clock that's been running for 3500 yea by slim · · Score: 1

    I know a clock that's been running for 3500 years. In fact, in a week or so, we wind it with a beautiful ceremony. Millions of people around the world will participate in the winding of this clock, and similar numbers meet several times a week to read its instructions, and wind it throughout the year.

    It is, of course, the Torah!
    ...


    Hillis just stared at me like I wasn't making sense.


    I'd have done the same. Maybe, like me, his religious education never covered the Jewish religion. That Wikipedia article doesn't tell me why the Torah is like a clock, nor do I know what winding ceremony you are referring to (my desk calendar lists many religious days, such as Yom Kippur and Ramadan, but there's nothing there until Halloween).

    So your "of course" isn't so obvious to me, Hillis (apparently) and millions of others unschooled in your particular religion.

    You've piqued my interest though, so I'd be keen to read your explanation. If it's a conventional interpretation of the Torah, perhaps you should update the Wikipedia article...

  114. Reference and wear by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1
    The first two questions that came to my mind about this clock are the timing reference and the wear. Imho all the rest are just 'higher layers' (like having alarms etc).

    It can't keep time by a primary standard (atomic clock or something) because this standard would probably not survive 10000 years itself. The way out they took is to synchronise it mechanically to the sun every day using lirrors and bimetals. In other words: it is an advanced sundial (no troll intended), just a bit more complicated and clever.

    Unfortunately I could not find info on the wear. The article mentions the avoidance of gems, precious materials etc (to avoid looting). Usually these are also the _hard_ materials that give ordinary clocks a good restatance to wear. How will they avoid that it comes to a grinding stop in 2000 years?

    1. Re:Reference and wear by Wornstrom · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately I could not find info on the wear. The article mentions the avoidance of gems, precious materials etc (to avoid looting). Usually these are also the _hard_ materials that give ordinary clocks a good restatance to wear. How will they avoid that it comes to a grinding stop in 2000 years?
      what I read in the discovery article is that the final clock will be huge, and that the mechanical binary adders pins will be large enough that they should last for 10,000 years. It doesn't use gears that can shrink in size, gradually speeding up the clock. I hope it is built before I die. I would love to see it completed.

  115. Ten Thousand Years of Solitude by IAN · · Score: 3, Interesting
    You might enineer it well enough to measure a wobble of the earth, but to actually package it so it can survive 10.000 years and still have a meaning is not only an engineering feat, it must be an antropology feat as well, to make people long after this understand what it is and leave it in pieces.

    The last part of that sentence indeed summarizes the chief obstacle to longevity of any monument.

    Incidentally, this is not the first time that such a time-scale has been deliberately studied. A while ago the U.S. Dept. of Energy actually commissioned a study into the problem of marking a long-term nuclear waste repository (WIPP in New Mexico, Yucca Mountain if it ever opens) so as to prevent unintentional intrusion and possible spread of contamination.

    Physicist and SF author Gregory Benford was on the team, and his account appears as the first chapter of his book, Deep Time. The book is, it seems, out of print, but still available on Amazon. There is a slightly garbled copy of that chapter online, minus the cool illustrations of several marker concepts. Some illustrations appear in the excerpted report of the WIPP Marker Panel. Fascinating and slightly unsettling stuff.

  116. Julian Calendar only? by grikdog · · Score: 1

    When the remnant of humankind on Mars reverts to Imperial Reign yearkeeping in Showa 1009, what will be the use of an obsolete "perpetual" calendar that doesn't know when Grom Vlagga Day is or what miblak Eta Carinae V is in?

    --
    ``Tension, apprehension & dissension have begun!'' - Duffy Wyg&, in Alfred Bester's _The Demolished Man_
    1. Re:Julian Calendar only? by psycho8me · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The last country to use the Julian calendar was Imperial Russia. I'm pretty sure it will use the gregorian.

    2. Re:Julian Calendar only? by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

      It will show the position of the planets as seen from the surface of the origin world, as you would know if you had read the article before posting.

    3. Re:Julian Calendar only? by grikdog · · Score: 1

      My point was that time is political, not that geeks are insufficiently aware of their peculiar subject matters. Oh, wait...

      --
      ``Tension, apprehension & dissension have begun!'' - Duffy Wyg&, in Alfred Bester's _The Demolished Man_
    4. Re:Julian Calendar only? by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

      That point, the contingency of time period names and divisions, is addressed in the article. Your comments will contribute more if you read the article. You will also become more informed.

    5. Re:Julian Calendar only? by grikdog · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, as this little flame-spat demonstrates, such a marvellous chronowhatsit will probably not survive the various unanticipated dooms we smegheads unleash on ourselves in the next 10,000 years, so the entire exercise seems remarkably quixotic. It seems to reside in Douglas Adams' Marvin the Depressed Robot category. That being the case, wasting YOUR time in the attempt to modify by nanokarms the future history of the species seems far more valuable than wasting MY time by reading an article whose future significance is obviously proscribed by human foible.

      --
      ``Tension, apprehension & dissension have begun!'' - Duffy Wyg&, in Alfred Bester's _The Demolished Man_
  117. The Clock of the Long Now by Shimmer · · Score: 1

    Article is slashdotted, so I can't tell if this is the Clock of the Long Now, but it certainly sounds similar.

    --
    The most rabid believers in American Exceptionalism are the exact same people whose policies are destroying it.
  118. Re:mice spiders and rodents by johnrpenner · · Score: 2, Interesting


    small micro-accumulation will occur in the darndest of places. if a chamber is sealed, bugs and critters are sure to get n there, and if some mice bring in a bunch of twigs and gum up the works -- and you have insects with a few centuries of grit in the device -- does it run as smoothly? the crawlspace under my house has loads of activity from little scurrying creatures -- anything that relies on exact tolerances for anything is sure to be gummed up -- its only a mattter of time. :>

  119. Yes, but... by Frazbin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe the machine is too complex, too expensive, too ponderous and big and pointless-- but it's such a beautifully human little thing to build that I can't help but love it. Not only that, but it's human in a way that is perhaps unique to modern times. The retrospection-- the self consciousness of a people that have discovered they are a part of *history*-- that's what I appreciate in this machine.

    Have you ever wondered why we don't find time capsules from two thousand years ago with messages for the future? It, apparently, simply didn't occur to anyone that they might be able to, by leaving a durable message, communicate in a one sided way with the future. That the human race now can think "I wonder what people will think of us when we're gone... we'd better let them know what kind of folks we are so they don't get the wrong impression", is a very hopeful sign. It indicates to me an elevation of consciousness-- the kind of consideration for the future that might make it so we don't *need* to build devices explaining our society to a hypothetical post-apocalyptic people.

      Maybe we can make this whole civilization thing sustainable after all. The big concern is, are there enough people like this?

    Oh, I'm sorry... Slashdot, right. "Yes, but does it store phone numbers?

    1. Re:Yes, but... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Have you ever wondered why we don't find time capsules from two thousand years ago with messages for the future? It, apparently, simply didn't occur to anyone that they might be able to, by leaving a durable message, communicate in a one sided way with the future.
      Until fairly recently (the last couple of centuries or so) pretty much everyone knew the past had been much like today, so it seemed a safe assumption that tommorow would be as well. There was no need to send such message. (Other than the odd royal tomb or religious monument - both of which are time capsules of a sort.)
  120. Other long-view thoughts: Time capsules by antispam_ben · · Score: 2, Interesting

    IIRC it was a small blurb in Scientific American a few years back (perhaps even pre-Y2K) where I first read of the LongNow Clock, and it got me interested in other long-term projects and ideas as well (which there aren't many).

    There's a HUGE time capsule at Oglethorpe University called "The Crypt of Civilization". Most time capsules you may have read about are small things about the size of a shoebox meant to be opened 50 to 100 years after they are sealed. The "Crypt" was a (indoor, apparently) swimming pool (emptied of water, of course) loaded up with many artifacts and sealed in 1930, and scheduled to be opened in about 6,000 years.

    Oglethorpe is also the home of The International Time Capsule Society. Notable pages on the website are Tips on Building a Time Capsule and The Nine Most Wanted Time Capsules.

    As I discussed on the forum at that site, it would be interesting to couple one or more time capsules to such a clock, to have each capsule be opened at a pre-programmed time.

    Disclaimer: I have no connection to Oglethorpe, just a fan of the site, and the "most prolific" contributor to the site's time capsule forum (three of the six posts).

    The clock is certainly a "Next-Generation" design, bring the very first Y10K-compliant device.

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
  121. Nice to have so much free time on your hands. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wonder how he made his money so he could get lost in a cave. I didn't RTFA, but how is his different than the one built by Brand et. al.?

    1. Re:Nice to have so much free time on your hands. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That question is precisely why you sould RTFA, you jackass...

  122. Re:Star field accurate? Why no modern tech.? by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

    Ok, how about an LBD?

    --
    -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  123. Re:I know a clock that's been running for 3500 yea by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1
    The Torah is a scroll, that's read during Torah readings (three per week, plus on the first day of the month) throughout the year. The "Rosh Hodesh" (start of the month) is based on lunar phase.

    During the holiday called Simchas Torah the scroll is rewound, and the process starts again. While some will dispute that this has been going in since Mt. Sinai, nobody will argue that it hasn't worked this way for at least 2100 years or so....

  124. speaking of clocks by austad · · Score: 1

    I've been looking for a really complex clock to put on my desk. A kit is fine too.

    I just want something that's mechanically complex, has maybe some kind of ingenious escapement, and something that is not cheaply made (made of solid, heavy pieces of metal). I've searched the net high and low and I can't find anything.

    I've been seriously considering getting some books on clock design and finding someone local with access to machine tools. I used to be a machinist, so if I had to fab the parts, it wouldn't be that difficult. Just time consuming.

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    1. Re:speaking of clocks by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      Maybe you could try making a behemoth version of a pocket watch.

      "Yes, its' a pocket watch. And yes, I'm aware a pocket watch shouldn't be 2 feet tall."

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    2. Re:speaking of clocks by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

      I've been looking for a really complex clock to put on my desk. A kit is fine too.

      I just want something that's mechanically complex, has maybe some kind of ingenious escapement, and something that is not cheaply made (made of solid, heavy pieces of metal). I've searched the net high and low and I can't find anything.


      This may not be what you have in mind, but you remind me that I've got cheap plastic clock that moves metal balls around. Its 'readout' is four lines of balls, minutes holding 0 to 9 balls (a tenth ball makes the line tilt over, dumping all balls except one, which drops into the tens line), tens of minutes 0 to 5, etc. The syncronous motor runs an arm that rotates once a minute, picking up a ball from the bottom and dumping it into the top. This was probably in a Sears catalog or somesuch a couple decades ago, I got this one in recent years at a yard sale. It doesn't always work quite right, but if it were better engineered and made of better materials I think it would be reliable. But it makes noise every minute, especially when it "rolls over."

      I've been seriously considering getting some books on clock design and finding someone local with access to machine tools. I used to be a machinist, so if I had to fab the parts, it wouldn't be that difficult. Just time consuming.

      I've wanted to make a clock totally out of wood, with wooden gears and such. I've got a Fine Woodworking book with a clock on the front, forget the title, that talks about making wooden gears. The challenge would be to make it long-lasting so it doesn't wear out in a short time of operation. I would likely give in and make the escapement and highest-wear components of metal.

      There was also an electronic clock ISTR seeing on /. from thinkgeek or something, that has four groups of LED's. Random ones light up in each group. You tell the time by adding up the number of lit LEDs in each group. Easily built with an AVR/PIC/8051 and appropriate C compiler.

      --
      Tag lost or not installed.
    3. Re:speaking of clocks by austad · · Score: 1

      I've considered that. I'd really like to see a Tourbillon movement sitting on my desk with as much exposed as possible.

      Or even an enlarged version of this considering I can't really justify spending $8-12k on the watch.

      --
      Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
  125. Re:mice spiders and rodents by Atticka · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Since the clock is binary, getting "gummed up" wont actually slow the clock down. Even if the parts show signs of wear the binary functions will still work. They even built an auto reset function that uses sunlight to heat a piece of metal when the sun reaches noon for example.

    The article also mentions finding material that will last for 10K years, maybe titanium? they havent decided yet. The functioning prototypes use stainless steel.

    --
    No sig here...
  126. Now Then by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've been a member of Bruce Sterling's Viridian Movement since before it started, which featured the Long Now's "Long Clock" project when it kicked off. I've even been to international design conferences where Sterling and Long Now people have presented, talking about the Clock. But they've obviously learned nothing from their own intriguing proposition.

    How can they possibly be sure that anything they make will be readable as a "clock" 10,000 years from now? That's the biggest problem: if humans even remain on Earth after 3x our current civilization's lifetime has passed, how will they read the clocks? The Egyptian Pyramids are increasingly clearly "clocks", like Stonehenge, for telling "what time it is" in the sky, among the constellations. That revelation only appeared to one guy, about 10 years ago, and is still known only to a few interested people. We still don't know how to tell when the "alarm" goes off, beyond some basics (which could be wrong). Even Stonehenge, recognized as a clock for longer and by more people, isn't really readable. And those clocks are only maybe 5-7,000 years old, mostly millennia where humans didn't change nearly as much as we have in the past millennium, or (likely) as much as we'll change in the next century or so.

    We've already built "long now" clocks, that haven't quite worked. They probably did achieve the same goals of the Long Now Foundation: giving society a way to learn to think about long periods of time with the same immediacy and importance as we think about the present moment. We should learn from the long experience in that project by solving the fundamental problem: communicating with our descendents 10,000 years from now. We can probably rely, like our ancestors, on celestial mechanics remaining readable by humans in such an (astronomically) brief time. A real Long Now Clock would merely promote human synchronization with those movements. Maybe a new stone megalith that points at decade/century/millennium markers in the sky. No moving parts, just pictures of humans reading the skies (showing the actual celestial mechanics and how the person decodes them).

    Baby Boomers, like the Long Now Foundation people, always think they're the first to invent or do anything, especially if it's fun. And they're great at reinventing the mistakes of history as they ignore it. They do get people motivated to do something as if it were new and exciting, though. So the best thing that this new toy clock they're building could do would be to perish, and pronto. Then we'd get a "second chance" (puns intended) to use the clocks we've already got, and change ourselves to use them. That change would also make us better people, with a longer view of "now", the future, and our place in it.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Now Then by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

      The works you cite are static, fixed, immobile. There is no precedent for a mechanism that can function accurately for ten thousand years. Stop worshiping the dead.

    2. Re:Now Then by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about with this "worshipping the dead"? Of course the "device" I describe is fixed, immobile. That's the whole point, as I detailed. The biggest problem is how to read any clock over 10,000 years. And I point out how to learn from our past successes and failures to demonstrate that point. All you've got is an obnoxious, willfully ignorant snipe at my post, which implies you didn't even read it before whining about it.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Now Then by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

      You cannot seriously believe that "how to read the clock" is a bigger problem than "how to you build an accurate mechanism that will remain in motion for ten thousand years." The ancient engineers you cite failed to create a mechanism in the first place. Your argument makes a virtue of their necessity. Creating a mechanism was beyond them; they could focus on intelligibility, and they flunked at that. A single, broken Rosetta Stone is a shabby effort.

    4. Re:Now Then by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Great Pyramid of Giza is a clock that tells time by the stars. It's about 5,000 years old. It still tells the time, if you know how to read it. We don't really know how to read it. Clearly, the problem is keeping the knowledge of reading it alive. Stonehenge is another example. There are many others, like Chichen Itza, probably Angkor Wat. And therefore probably many others where the device still exists, but we no longer recognize it as a clock, because we don't know how to read it. Why is that so hard for you to understand?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:Now Then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are a faggot nigger

    6. Re:Now Then by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

      The Great Pyramid at Giza fails to track precession. If it is a clock, it is a crummy one.

    7. Re:Now Then by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      #1: In point of fact, the Pyramid was used to track precession over its entire 26 million year cycle.
      #2: Even if the Pyramid failed to track precession, it was still an inaccurate clock that was used for thousands of years. That's superior to any technology we've got, in terms of longevity, the issue we're discussing.

      But then, you're not impressed by the Rosetta Stone, which preserved enough lingustic cross-tabluation that it unlocked whole cultures as a key to decode their records. Thousands of years after it was made, without any indication that such decoding was in its design principles. While our own recording technologies usually don't even suffice to retain our records adequately for a human lifetime, even when durability is within their design specs. What is your problem with recognizing engineering successes of the past? Why do you insist on rejecting the lessons we can learn in making our own technology better? Especially when you reject them on erroneous bases? Real engineers change our frame of reference to include useful facts in accomplishing the goal. We don't just reject sources of solutions in ignorance to comply with our foregone conclusions of false superiority.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    8. Re:Now Then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey DocRubish, If you think 'whatever' will find this thing in 10,000 years won't know what time it is for themselves, your a complete douche. The point is that we can tell by the pyramids that the ancient egyptians had knowledge of cosmology, which is exactly what what this project is aiming to do (aside from the other stated goal of getting humans to think more 'big picture'). Maybe if you pulled your arrogant arse out of your butt and RTFA you'd realize that instead of comming off as an idiot.

    9. Re:Now Then by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      They're building a mechanical clock with moving parts, you stupid fuck. Pull your own "ars out of your butt". Asshole.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    10. Re:Now Then by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

      Longevity is trivial for a construction with no moving parts. Silbury Hill in better shape than the Great Pyramid, because its builders understood that no one would bother stealing chalk. The Great Pyramid is the most impressive big pile of rocks on the planet, but the Clock of the Long Now, if successful, will surpass it as a Wonder.

    11. Re:Now Then by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      There aren't too many constructions from 5,000 years ago left intact - it's not trivial. Other megaliths are also useful demonstrations of longevity, and of our inadequacy in retaining the ability to use those devices for their timekeeping purpose. The Long Now Clock probably won't last 5,000 or 10,000 years. But if it does, it won't necessarily be any more readable as the time than are those old monuments - which will most likely still be standing, keeping time. So we come full circle: the Long Now Clock is attacking the wrong part of the problem, as demonstrated by the existing artifacts which solved the easier part: how to last intact for 5,000+ years.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    12. Re:Now Then by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

      It is trivial given sufficient cruelty and a legal system that enforces slavery. You simply torment generations of slaves into piling up such a quantity of stones that only another generation of tormentees could disperse it again, and aim at being the most cruel, egotistical slave master for 5,000 years.

    13. Re:Now Then by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      We've got much better motivators than slavery for making lasting works, have for centuries, yet we haven't matched their achievement. Now we're trying, with all the potent products of that better motivation, and we're not going to make it. That doesn't say anything about the superiority of slavery, but it does show that our technology alone can't match their achievement. What we need, the entire point of the Long Now Clock, is the ability to relate to very long timespans beyond a human lifetime.

      Also, there have been many societies which could have mustered pyramid-scale labor, but haven't produced such devices. I'm not talking about the exertion being impressive, but the design and its performance. As a comparison, the ancient Greek celestial computer was a nearby competitor to the Pyramids which didn't last nearly as long. The mechanical Long Now Clock is more like the Greek one than the Egyptian one. We're using the wrong examples to meet the goal of a 10,000 year clock.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    14. Re:Now Then by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

      We've got much better motivators than slavery for making lasting works ...

      Name a few.

      If you are aluding to the profit motive, which has moved so many carbon atoms into the atmosphere, raising the temperature of the earth, then it appears that by both tonnage and duration-of-impact we have dwarfed the achievement of the egomaniacal pharoah. If you find that example contentious, substitute the Panama Canal.

    15. Re:Now Then by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Exactly. What's your point? We've dwarfed the achievement in scale of atoms moved, but not in developing a sense of time on an Egyptian scale. FWIW, we also have produced many leaders whose egomania also dwarfs that of the pharoahs.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  127. Re:I know a clock that's been running for 3500 yea by slim · · Score: 1

    That's interesting, and I consider myself newly educated, so thanks!

    But based on your description, the Torah clock overflows to zero once a year, so it does not embody the Long Now as the 10,000 year clock intends to. In order to do so, ever Simchas Torah a counter would somehow need to incremented.

  128. batteries by mennucc1 · · Score: 1

    If I want to buy my own, do I have to buy all batteries in advance too?

  129. Exercise in Ego by igable · · Score: 1

    Did anyone notice that this is a rather unique exercise in ego? I think the guy needs a dose of Buddist doctrine; everything is impermanent. Why doesn't he have some kids? Maybe that will give him the pseudo immortality he is looking for.

    1. Re:Exercise in Ego by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

      You are confused. 10,000 years is not permanence.

  130. Re:mice spiders and rodents by khallow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They probably won't use titanium. One of the requirements is that the clock not be made of anything valuable enough to make it worth tearing up the clock.

  131. Not only ruins by joggle · · Score: 1

    There are still intact buildings from the Roman era. I was just at the Parthanon and it didn't look like a ruin to me. Of course, it has been maintained all these years because it was used as a church.

    1. Re:Not only ruins by MemeRot · · Score: 1

      The Parthenon was built in 447 BC. That's less than 2500 years ago. Old, but not on the time scale of this project. Also it's made of stone, which seems to me a more durable material than any metal alloy I can think of.

      There's only one material I can think of that will still be around in 10,000 years, and thus suitable to build this out of: disposable baby diapers.

    2. Re:Not only ruins by joggle · · Score: 1
      Actually, it is made from concrete (not reinforced concrete either). I remember the tour guide mentioning that modern concrete would barely be able to hold up its own weight in the dome part if it wasn't reinforced. They knew a thing or two about how to build structures back then. Also, the original huge metal door is still being used. Also, the Parthanon is in a state of very good repair. If its maitenance continues there's no reason to believe it wouldn't look as good 7500 years from now.

      The key is maitenance. If people maintain the structures they'll last. If the pyramids hadn't been gutted by people long ago they'd probably look almost as good as when they were brand new. The only thing missing would be the paint.

    3. Re:Not only ruins by MemeRot · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of the Pantheon then, which is only 2032 years old.

      From wikipedia on the concrete dome:
      "The composition of the Roman concrete used in the dome remains a mystery. An unreinforced dome in these proportions made of modern concrete would hardly stand the load of its own weight, since concrete has very low tensile strength, yet the Pantheon has stood for centuries. It is known from Roman sources that their concrete is made up of a pasty hydrate lime; pozzolanic ash from a nearby volcano; and fist-sized pieces of rock. In this, it is very similar to modern concrete. The high tensile strength appears to come from the way the concrete was applied in very small amounts and then was tamped down to remove excess water at all stages. This appears to have prevented the air bubbles that normally form in concrete as the material dries, thus increasing its strength enormously."

      Maintenance is the key. That's why I think the idea of building a clock that will last without a maintainer is highly dubious. Mechanical computers will have problems with dust, sand, etc.

    4. Re:Not only ruins by joggle · · Score: 1
      Ya, the Pantheon. I'm terrible with names (I actually read that wikipedia article just a week ago).

      If they seal the clock up dust shouldn't be too big of an issue (big 'if' of course). Probably humans will damage it at some point, one way or another.

  132. Re:mice spiders and rodents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'd better be big mice. This thing is supposed to be somewhere in excess 60 feet tall when assembled. The unit that is about 5 feet tall appears to have pins (these are the moving parts of the clock)the thickness of a pencil. The full scale one should have pins around 3 inches in diameter. Big heavy 5 centimeter thick pins of bronze or some other long wearing, low corroding metal - which usually means heavy. Better be some darned big mice to gum those suckers up... otherwise it just gets messy with splattered bits of mouse everywhere.

    BTW - bugs and mcie and such will not neccesarily get into this if it is sealed - heck, some egyptian tombs over 3,000 years old were air tight until archeaolgists opened em up. Air tight means no bugs, mice or anything bigger than an oxygen molecule.

  133. Its been done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about Tanaka Hisashige's Mannendokei (ten-thousand year clock) displayed at this year's Expo in Aichi, Japan? And that was like, what, only a hundred years ago? 1880 called, they want their clock back. http://www.karakuri.info/master Meh.

    1. Re:Its been done. by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

      Based on the line drawing you linked to, that clock is built with gears. Gears wear down over time and make the clock inaccurate. Read the article, anonymous coward.

  134. Re:Actually, it just occurred to me..Maya Calendar by rssrss · · Score: 1

    The Maya Calendar is discussed at the Calendar FAQ Section 8 and in more detail here.

    The relationship between the Maya and Western Calendars called "The Correlation Problem" has been the subject of scholarly dispute for many years. The two best theories are 2 days apart and yield Gregorian dates for the end of the current cycle of 2012-12-21 and 2012-12-23, respectively.

    --
    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
  135. Re:mice spiders and rodents by OgreFade · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually the mechanism is based on a binary 28bit set of discs. So even if its gummed up a bit, it'll be a zero or a one. The magazine discussed this. I wonder if mice even live at the site they picked out.

  136. Re:Star field accurate? Why no modern tech.? by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

    Do you really think an LCD display will last 10000 years?

    I recall LCD displays on gas pumps that didn't last through the winter. They were damaged by freezing weather and didn't have backheating.

    Electronics can be made moderately reliable for 20 years, but I wouldn't bet on much longer than that.

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
  137. Re:Star field accurate? Why no modern tech.? by Gandalf04 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    But I think that minimally the design of the clock should demonstrate the peak of the builder's knowledge and aspect of culture

    Thus is exemplified the process of thinking too narrowly. The clock is not about showing us off to tomorrow, but about connecting us with them. It's a work of engineering genius, not a time capsule.
  138. How long is a moment? by darthlurker · · Score: 1

    The article goes on about how accurate the clock is for a long time. But then uses this extremely vague word to describe its precision.

    My first thought was of a George Carlin bit "There's a moment coming soon. Any moment now... Aw shit, its gone!" (probably mis-quoted)

  139. Feature Request by Azrael43 · · Score: 1

    Like other clocks, this one can track seconds, hours, days, and years.

    Minutes would be nice too.

  140. Volcano and Earthquake Proof? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't an eruption of the super volcano in the western United States completely destroy this clock? Wouldn't a large earthquake (The Big One) that dumps the western seaboard into the ocean also potentially destroy the clock? IIRC, both would probably occur in the next 10,000 years.

  141. MOD PARENT UP! by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
    Please, for the love of all that is holy, mod the parent comment up. I was about to post the same quote myself.

    There are some interesting parallels.

    Mechanical computation features prominently in both Babbage's engines and in the Long Now clock.

    And the lay public seem to have approximately equal levels of difficulty in understanding how each device is supposed to work....

    --
    ~Idarubicin
  142. I once had such an alarm clock by rduke15 · · Score: 1

    While all this sounds complicated to have in a little alarm clock, it's of course done in a couple of minutes on any Linux/*nix box.

    I had that on my previous home server. Just a few crontab entries, which would play various sounds. I also set it up for a short while to play an Internet radio stream to wake up, but that bored me quickly.

    The most useful were 2 different sounds for the 2 different times the 2 (small) children had to leave for school. That was incredibly effective. Instead of constantly having to try to convince them they should hurry up and go, we just watched them hear the sound and hurry up, without having to say anything.

    The icing on the cake was a small text file keeping track of school holidays and one-time schedule changes, so the sounds would always and only go off at the right days and times.

    If getting your children to leave for school drives you mad every morning, I highly recommend that solution.

  143. And they'll study it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Eventually they'll study it and learn and advance. Nothing wrong with that .. Egyptians, Greeks etc. advanced because of religious beliefs and curiosities.

    1. Re:And they'll study it by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Eventually they'll study it and learn and advance.

      Actually, if we have to go through a civilization reboot--if there is some nuclear catastrophe and we end up back at the stone age--this clock could result in mechanically-directed technology. We could end up with the Difference Engine instead of the transistor.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  144. My clock will last longer! For only 10,000. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Deposit $10,000 in a savings with 2% apr ($200 per year) and buy a new cheap clock every month.

  145. It's about time... by vanyel · · Score: 1

    ...Stonehenge has long since worn out. I wonder if there was an equivalent article when it was being thought up?

  146. Accurately for 10k years impossible: leap seconde by jcdr · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Because this depend of the earth roation speed variation that no one can predict for a such long time now.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second
    http://hpiers.obspm.fr/iers/bul/bulc/bulletinc.dat
    http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/leapsec.html
    http://maia.usno.navy.mil/eo/leapsec.html
    http://maia.usno.navy.mil/whatiseop.html

    Last prediction are for one year ahead at most:
    http://maia.usno.navy.mil/ser7/ser7.dat

    Did you realize that the next new year will be after the 31 december 2005 at 23 hour 59 minute and 60 seconde, not 59 seconde ? So this clock will show false time in a few months, no needs to wait 10'000 year!!!

  147. A Clock That Runs for 10,000 Years... by Randall311 · · Score: 1

    ...or until the power goes out. Whichever comes first.

  148. Book on the Clock of the Long Now by OctaneZ · · Score: 1

    There is also a book, also called The Clock of the Long Now: Time and Responsibility , attempting to explain the thinking behind the clock, and the effects of humans over long time spans as well.

  149. Genius by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

    "'Danny's intelligence is the rarest of kinds,' says Rose. 'The sheer practicality of his knowledge makes him a true genius.'

    As an MIT undergrad in 1975, Hillis and his friends built a binary computer out of 10,000 Tinkertoy pieces. It could beat all comers at tic-tac-toe. About a decade later he invented an electronic mainframe computer called the Connection Machine that worked somewhat like a human brain; instead of one processor, it had 65,536, all firing at once like buzzing neurons, a model that supercomputers have used ever since. The irony is inescapable: The architect of the world's fastest machine now designs the world's slowest."

    Holy hell, he built a tinkeroy machine that could beat all comers at tic-tac-toe? He IS a genius!!

    Pheh, the model that the Connection Machine used is NOT used in all supercomputers ever since. In fact, the model was scrapped because it was too hard to code for.

    So either Hillis was tooting his own horn to the reporter (, lying), or the reporter was rather the opposite of what he was lauding Hillis for.

    1. Re:Genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wikipedia: "In the later 1980s and 1990s, attention turned from vector processors to massive parallel processing systems with thousands of "ordinary" CPUs; some being off the shelf units and others being custom designs. Today, parallel designs are based on "off the shelf" RISC microprocessors, such as the PowerPC or PA-RISC, and most modern supercomputers are now highly-tuned computer clusters using commodity processors combined with custom interconnects." Reference was to massively parallel architecture, and Hillis was indeed the first out of the box with this architecture.

    2. Re:Genius by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      Read up on the CM-1 and CM-2 then get back to me on that one.

      They are NOT clustered computers.

      Modern parallel computers are either vector machines, or more commonly just large numbers of off the shelf CPUs. This is quite different from the CM-1's approach which was to have CPUs barely capable of doing anything, but linking them together in unique geometries to accomplish tasks. It was a neat idea but not altogether very practical.

      If the guy says that everyone is using that idea now, he'd be lying.

  150. Read Bronson's Book for a Desc. of the Clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Po Bronson's book "The Nudist on the Late Shift" has an excellent chapter on Danny Hillis and specifically the Clock. Very informative, and you actually have the way Hillis thinks and works laid out to you word by word and the overall grand purpose of the Clock described. The rest of the book is great, from a dot-com boom history perspective.

    ISBN 0-7679-0603-9

    Picked mine up at 7-Eleven for $0.69; read it 3 times.

  151. The most accurate clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ive got a clock that has run accuratly for millions of years. Your standing on it. The Earth is apparently a comptuer to, but that is all in the H2G2.

    Remember Danny Hillis of Thinking Machines? He is a principal in the Long Now. ( and he answers email! ).

    Get a loot at the website, and the pictures of the clocks. All increaidbly crispy. dig deep.

  152. Not just time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Propel, propel, propel your craft
    theough the liquid solution.
    Ecstatically, ecstatically, ecstatically, ecstatically,
    Existence is simply illusion.

  153. the first prototype by rkww · · Score: 1
    The first prototype of the clock is in the Science Museum in London, England. I saw it a couple of weeks ago when I took my son there for the day.

    It had stopped.

  154. Marvin the clock by SiliconTrip · · Score: 1

    The first ten thousand years were the worst, and the second ten thousand years, they were the worst too. The third ten thousand years I didn't enjoy at all. After that I went into a bit of a decline.

    It's the people you meet in this job that really get you down. The best conversation I had was over forty thousand years ago, and that was with a coffee machine.

  155. spiral walkway by KlaymenDK · · Score: 1

    The article mentions successive rooms in which ever "faster" components are on display. The thing is to be placed in a cave in California.

  156. because of car traffic by KlaymenDK · · Score: 1

    I won't say that your statement is false (because I don't know that it is), but I will say that I believe "cathedral sickness" is a far greater concern than [pollution].

    Cathedral sickness is when the roof weighs too heavily on the supporting pillars, causing the once-parrallel pillars to fan outward. Notice how many (even small) churches have metal bands running between the pillar tops; this is to prevent/combat cathedral sickness.

  157. Amen Brother! by Maltheus · · Score: 1

    I want to listen to MP3s as I get ready in the morning, not stupid NPR. I know I can probably rig up an easy solution to this, but why isn't it in alarm clocks yet?

    You're also right about the sounds. My alarm clock keeps the lousiest time, but I keep using it because the alarm sound is tolerable. I no longer have as much problem hitting the snooze, but I end up waking up a little earlier each day (until daylight savings comes around and I get off my ass to reset it).

  158. Re:mice spiders and rodents by sjames · · Score: 1

    That is a significant design consideration. That's why it has the computation disks rather than a more conventional set of clockwork gears. It avoids the issue of lost accuracy caused by wear and the micro accumulations.

    The big slow gears will have a tremendous torque behind them in spite of only turning once in a few centuries.

  159. As the clock is modelled around our solar system.. by phorm · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't the clock itself be a manual. I mean, if you can see that the sun is in position X when midnight hits, etc etc, it would make sense to perhaps corellate the two.

  160. I saw that by ianscot · · Score: 1
    And dang it, you can't even Google up a picture of the thing. I'd really like to see if you're right.

    You're right, if people had any standards and would demand decent products... Well, I can't even imagine the results, so it must be pretty unlikely.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  161. Re: Accurately for 10k years impossible: leap seco by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

    Read the article. The clock corrects itself for variations in day length.

  162. Re: Accurately for 10k years impossible: leap seco by jcdr · · Score: 1

    I have read the article and I found no explaination at all about how the clock can calculate the local time including the leap second. Ok, the clock have a synchronization of the earth rotation using the sunlight, but this in no way synchronized to the local time. First current local time is an offset of UTC and UTC is an offet to TAI and TAI is a averge of many atomic clocks, so the basic of our local time is not astronomic, but atomic (http://cr.yp.to/proto/utctai.html). This clock can be a impressive model of the astronomic motion, but this is the wrong way to tel the local time. Second, even for the astronomic motion I have doubts, since I never see a paper telling that the earth axis motion can be know for 10'000 year. But you can find papers that tel exactly the opposite: this motion is largely unpredictable as now for a such long time. See this URL about how complexe is the earth rotation axis http://mb-soft.com/public/precess.html and this URL about why this is impossible to predict at full precision this movement http://www.cv.nrao.edu/~rfisher/Ephemerides/earth_ rot.html. Did you know that such bulltins exists ftp://maia.usno.navy.mil/ser7/iersexp.sup ? Last, did you realiste that the local time is an human concept that have radicaly changed in less than one century ? How can someone assert that this will not change in 10'000 year ? Juste an exemple: the Asian earthquake end last year did have an observable impact on the earth roation, see http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2005/jan/HQ_05011_ earthquake.html. So keep in mind this basic facts: 1) astronomic motion is unpredictable in full precision for long time; 2) local time in based on atomic observation plus offset to keep it compatible with astronomic observation, not the opposit!

  163. Re: Accurately for 10k years impossible: leap seco by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1
    What in the article gives you the impression that the clock is intended to display the local time to the second?

    When you read an article, read the sidebars too, and discover things such as:

    HOW THE CLOCK CAN BE READ

    The Clock of the Long Now prototype features an orrery, a simplified planetary display. The shperical cage of the orrery, called the firmament, is tilted at 23.27 degrees, the angle of he Earth's axis in relation to the flat plane of the planets as they radiate out form the sun. The cage includes a celestial equator with degree markings for measuring the alignment of the planets at any given time.



    When you read an article, don't skip over the numbers, and you won't miss things such as:
    A calculation that extends to 28 bits is accurate to one in 3.65 millionor in clock terms, one day in 10,000 years.
    The clock is intended to be accurate to the day, not to the second.

    Finally, when you read an article, read at least two thirds of it, and you won't miss things such as:
    [W]hat to display gives Hillis the most pause. All cultures recognize days, months, and years because they spring from simple "once around" astronomical cycles, but hours, weeks, centuries, and other divisions are arbitrary, varying wildly across times and places. Hillis is still mulling how to handle that, but he knows for sure that the final clock will somehow mirror the positions of the planets relative to the stars and to one another. "That will be one of many displays it has," he says.
  164. Re: Accurately for 10k years impossible: leap seco by jcdr · · Score: 1

    From the article: "Like other clocks, this one can track seconds, hours, days, and years." This is precisely what is impossible because of what I have wrote in my previouse post. How long is a year in any other systeme than TAI is unknow until the year has finish to be observed, no matter how complexe is the system you use. This clock will be one seconde too early from the first january of 2006. So the claim "can track seconds, hours, days, and years" is false. If you dont' belive me just wait the next new year.

  165. Re:mice spiders and rodents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given that the great pyramids were torn up for their stone, the clock may have to be made of some as yet unknown more boring material.

    The related problem is that, if they find the most boring material to build the clock out of, the fact that it's the most boring material makes it no longer boring.

  166. Re: Accurately for 10k years impossible: leap seco by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

    What in the article leads you to believe that Brad Lemley is authoritative with respect to what the clock shall track?

  167. Re: Accurately for 10k years impossible: leap seco by jcdr · · Score: 1

    Good question. I don't wants to verify every claims from the article. Time is a very complexe thing and it's incredible how many peoples know almost nothing about the time there use every day of there life. The article at some point make a mix between different type of time without a clear explanation. I reacted in a little provocating way, I agree, after not seeing (at this time) any post with good moderation pointing to the local time claim problem.

  168. Re:mice spiders and rodents by khallow · · Score: 1
    Actually, the pyramids were torn up for their beautiful high quality limestone veneer (of which only a little remains on one pyramid). The cheaper limestone that makes up the bulk of the pyramids remains relatively intact.

    If there's a lot of this "boring" material, then demand will easily be satisfied. There are many types of stone that you could easily give a sizeable bolder to everyone on the planet and still not affect the supply.