Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft and MTV to Launch Music Service

An anonymous reader writes "According to ZDNet Microsoft and MTV have joined forces to form Urge, a new online music service. From the article: 'The company said Urge would include a subscription component, as well as allowing individual song sales. A spokesman declined to discuss pricing, saying full details would be announced next month. The company gave no specifics on launch date beyond saying it would be sometime in 2006.'"

233 comments

  1. Music? by KingSkippus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Music?

    I know Microsoft has the music player in Windows, but what does MTV have to do with music?

    1. Re:Music? by themoodykid · · Score: 4, Funny

      They are doing a reality show about i.

    2. Re:Music? by themoodykid · · Score: 1

      It, dammit. IT! Next time, preview, moron!

    3. Re:Music? by marcello_dl · · Score: 0, Redundant
      ...what does MTV have to do with music?

      Cute, a redundant first post. I guess that people reading the headline asked themselves that very same question and were annoyed to see it repeated in your comment?

      Anyway, please be fair to MTV.
      MTV : good music = Microsoft : good software
      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    4. Re:Music? by somersault · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      MTV2 is actually very good.. maybe you dont get it in the US tho :p

      --
      which is totally what she said
    5. Re:Music? by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      Maybe they need a CMT2 for those of us who don't want to watch Dukes of Hazard all day. They seem to be falling into the same style rut.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    6. Re:Music? by c_forq · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing your MTV2 is still music videos. MTV2 USED to be good here. Now it is just reruns from MTV ("retro" or "classic" Real Worlds and Road Rules, etc.). MTV-U is fair, but that is only on college campuses to my knowledge. But nothing is what MTV2 used to be and MUCH Music was about a decade ago. I've heard Fuse is good, but I don't have it in my TV lineup so I can't express my opinion.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    7. Re:Music? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Well I've not been at the family home watching satellite for months, but yeah MTV2 had great taste in alternative/rock type stuff, live shows, Gonzo (Zane Lowe presented), was excellent. Now I just listen to my MP3 collection all day, maybe radio in the car sometimes

      --
      which is totally what she said
    8. Re:Music? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Mtv is music service provider and has lot stores , may be both Microsoft and MTV may promote music related products. my blogs Cheap laptop review blog and Tech News Blog

    9. Re:Music? by Monkelectric · · Score: 2, Funny

      My first thought was (and somehow I was imaging lewis black saying this) "Oh great the people who runied computers getting together with the people who ruined music."

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    10. Re:Music? by thatedeguy · · Score: 1

      I'm as confused as you are... Maybe Uncle Bill has something up his sleeve?

    11. Re:Music? by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      MTV2 is actually very good.

      So where can I find Microsoft2?

    12. Re:Music? by somersault · · Score: 1

      you mean Google? Hehehehe.. meh

      --
      which is totally what she said
    13. Re:Music? by JamesTRexx · · Score: 1

      I don't think they get your joke. At least they could've modded you flamebait instead of redundant.

      You are joking, right?

      --
      home
    14. Re:Music? by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      Well I'd have to go back and watch MTV and use M$ stuff to tell you seriously how things are, so I'm joking.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  2. Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    DRMTV

  3. Serious Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What in the world could be more pathetic? Honestly

    On a side note, my other thoughts are; Microsoft [illicitly whether disclosed or not] is conquering the computer market with dumbed down and crap software) and MTV, poisoning the minds of every youth in the U.S.A. and Canada, bringing their rap music and all that goes along with it (violence, drugs, gangs... whether or not people won't admit it). To me, in some abstract way, this is an attempt [albeit obviously non-personal] my world, the "digital" world, as well as my physical (dreaded) world, I don't mean to sound like such a pathetic bastard, but, come on, ANY ORGANIZATION between two 'evil' corporations like this, is scary.

    Just my conglomeration of crappy thoughts =)

    1. Re:Serious Question by el+americano · · Score: 4, Funny

      poisoning the minds of every youth in the U.S.A. and Canada

      Don't stop there. Obviously you've never watched MTV en Español.

      --
      Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. -Groucho Marx
    2. Re:Serious Question by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      4 words: Pimp My Ride UK. (shudder)

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    3. Re:Serious Question by chris_eineke · · Score: 1

      That's not bling on their teeth, either. :P

      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    4. Re:Serious Question by Nightspirit · · Score: 1

      Last time I was in Nogalas, they were still showing Headbanger's Ball. It was awesome. I doubt american MTV even has the show on anymore.

    5. Re:Serious Question by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      I used to tune MTV at 2am just to watch that show (Argentina). I mourned its loss like it was a close relative.

    6. Re:Serious Question by Hrshgn · · Score: 1

      And MTV Germany has: Pimp my bicycle (no joke!).

    7. Re:Serious Question by 6hill · · Score: 1

      Oh, man. Really? I totally want to watch that! Damn MTV Finland for showing only Pimp My Ride: Original Flava.

    8. Re:Serious Question by c_forq · · Score: 1

      Saturdays at 10pm EST on MTV2 here in the states.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
  4. New p2p network announced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SURGE

    1. Re:New p2p network announced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both MTV and MSFT are involved. You must mean SCOURGE.

  5. Urge? by penguinboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds more like a service for "adult material", not music.

    1. Re:Urge? by krunk4ever · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's not too far from the truth. Have you seen the newest music videos. I'd say at least 25% have quite erotic scenes in them.

    2. Re:Urge? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of an energy drink.

      Perhaps because it rhymes with surge?

    3. Re:Urge? by chris_eineke · · Score: 1
      Have you seen the newest music videos. I'd say at least 25% have quite erotic scenes in them.
      Well, popular movements sell popular music. 90 per cent of everything is junk, anyways.
      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    4. Re:Urge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      my humps, my humps, my humps, my lovely lady lumps....

      Music, erotic? what are you talking about?!

    5. Re:Urge? by joey_knisch · · Score: 1

      I can just see the commercials now...

      Got Urge?

    6. Re:Urge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummmm wonder what DR {Divine right}thinks of this theft of his micro bus's name..

    7. Re:Urge? by alan.briolat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah. Thats actually what they are selling their music with. It distracts from the "music".

      --
      I swear we should be allowed to give mod points to sigs... "-1, Offtopic"
    8. Re:Urge? by man_eleven · · Score: 1

      ...or it's time to take a dump. either way, it's a far cry from non-threatening and sparkly clean sounding itunes.

  6. Could be big by i_should_be_working · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't live in the states anymore. I'm not 'with it' anymore either. Is MTV still the main way that the kids see their videos? 'Cause if so, a whole 24 hour a day channel that's already popular is much better advertisment than any other music download service could buy.

    They could even put the website address beneath the song title, artist, etc. in every video.

    1. Re:Could be big by flonker · · Score: 2, Informative

      MTV hasn't been Music Television in many years.

    2. Re:Could be big by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      They should throw AOL in the mix and then we'll finally get those Shakespeare sonets we've been promised: millions of AOL users typing on Microsoft keyboards while their brains are exposed to MTV "music". Or, worst case scenario, Microsoft gets their own Wikipedia.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    3. Re:Could be big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      As a college student... no. MTV is a lousy source for Music Videos, and everybody here knows it. You'd be hard pressed not to, since they don't SHOW them anymore. For a while, they had an advertising campaign saying "The videos are on MTV2, so stop asking", and MTV2 now is being invaded by non-music programming as well.

      For Music Videos, people watch either Fuse, CMT, or they watch BET, depending on taste in Music.

    4. Re:Could be big by doubtless · · Score: 1

      It's all about reality shows these days. Lucky (relative) for us in Malaysia there are a couple tv stations following a somewhat radio-like format that shows nothing else but music videos, pretty similar to MTV during the days of "video killed the radio star"

      --
      geek page at KY speaks
    5. Re:Could be big by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Come on, don't be mean. You get to see my dawg Xzibit pimpin' your ride, ya! Who needs music?

      *shoots himself*

    6. Re:Could be big by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's funny, MTV became so overrun with non-music that they created MTV2 for the music. Now, the same thing is starting to happen with MTV2.

    7. Re:Could be big by Milton+Waddams · · Score: 1

      MTV2 is though, at least in Europe. They're nearly like MTV was when it first started out. I've discovered a lot of really good new bands (Bloc Party, Arcade Fire, The Killers, Arctic Monkeys, Willy Mason etc.) from watching it. Urge could be really cool if it were to provide content that's shown on MTV2.

      It probably won't though. It'll probably offer shite popular music like Madonna and Brittany Spears.

      I wouldn't buy it even if were cool 'cause of the DRM not being supported on the Mac and the fact that I can buy a CD with no DRM.

    8. Re:Could be big by dsgitl · · Score: 0

      Oh, you didn't know? They've since created MTV Fuse, which this time -- for real! -- will only play music videos. It's available on digital cable and probably sattellite.

    9. Re:Could be big by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      It'll probably offer shite popular music like Madonna and Brittany Spears.

      I can tolerate that much more than I can rap music. I miss when MTV was nothing but rock videos. Now we have a channel for nothing but rap music and one with nothing but reality shows and rap music.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    10. Re:Could be big by Metzli · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's weird. I get three channels that allegedly show music (MTV, MTV2, and Fuse) and only one (Fuse) shows videos before 1AM. Of course, the only videos that MTV seems to show are rap and hip hop. Perhaps it's no great loss that they don't show them before 1AM.

      --
      "It's too bad stupidity isn't painful." - A. S. LaVey
    11. Re:Could be big by courtarro · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I'm most bothered by the fact that Viacom (who owns MTV) basically owns all music video stations on TV. They started out with just MTV, but now they own MTV2, VH1, CMT, BET, Fuse, and CTN (College Television). With that sort of monopoly, I'm surprised that people are so bent out of shape about Clearchannel, Infinity*, Jefferson Pilot, and the likes on the radio, considering how much worse the TV situation is. As an artist, you'd better not make Viacom mad or you're guaranteed never to reach the average teen or college student who doesn't make an active effort to find new music. Viacom is the music video god who determines what this demographic will consider cool, and in doing so they're destroying everything we hold dear.

      Back when MTV first started sucking (by sucking I mean not playing videos), I could easily move to MTV2 for a metal fix, or VH1 for a classic rock fix, or CTN for the latest in alternative. Now they're all the same blathering crap that has little to do with music, and what's left is, as has been mentioned, hip hop and rap. Even VH1's music-based TV shows like "My Generation" and "Pop Up Video" have disappared in favor of "I Love the 80's". I think CMT is the only station they haven't fully corrupted yet, and you know it's only a matter of time.

      * Owned by Viacom!

    12. Re:Could be big by kadathseeker · · Score: 1

      No one I know watches it for music (even if they could). But I only know cool people, and have no idea what the hell the sheeple do. I torrent all my music, delete the loads of crappy music-factory songs, then buy what's left (which isn't much, there's alot of suckage out there). I've actually bought more CDs then ever doing this. I buy about one CD a month now, up from not buying any when I lived overseas and had no idea what to listen to. But I won't be buying $ony any more...

      --
      The 'Net is a waste of time, and that's exactly what's right about it. - William Gibson
    13. Re:Could be big by lordofthechia · · Score: 1

      "They could even put the website address beneath the song title, artist, etc. in every video."

      Even better, they could display a barcode on the bottom of the screen during the video. That way those of us with cue cats can scan it and get to the song download without having to type!

      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    14. Re:Could be big by GoatMonkey2112 · · Score: 1

      If you actually want to see videos for new songs you are better off going to an online source. I think Yahoo and Launch made a pretty decent streaming video site. You do have to watch ads between them sometimes though.

    15. Re:Could be big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try IMF, Internation Music Feed. It's not on a lot of providers, but I have it with DirectTV. I think of IMF as the old MTV, it's got a lot of different music, some of which I like, some of which I don't. There are very few commercials and the "non-music video" programming isn't really there, with the exception of shows like "Hello " which gives some facts about the country while showcasing videos of bands from the country. I first heard of MIA, from Brazil ( back in the spring on IMF, now she's all over the place (even in the background for the civic commercial where the car jumps on rooftops and flies through a pipe on a crane...).

      Fuse is great too, but they are turning into MTV with their obsessive use of VJs and tons of commercials. You get about 4 videos every half hour on Fuse, and that just doesn't seem right. They also seem to be going the way of MTV with their TRL like afternoon shows, imho. This isn't to say I don't like Fuse, because Fuse definitely plays the kind of music I like, it's just that there isn't enough of it.

    16. Re:Could be big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I only know cool people, and have no idea what the hell the sheeple do.

      We sit around ridiculing "cool" people who use idiotic phrases like "sheeple".

    17. Re:Could be big by ksheff · · Score: 1

      I think CMT is the only station they haven't fully corrupted yet

      they certainly don't play much country music on the Country Music Television channel.
      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    18. Re:Could be big by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Actually, I JUST saw that channel last night. I give it 2 months before they're playing "real world" reruns.

  7. The 'Cyber' World by kihjin · · Score: 3, Funny

    Although offering few details, the company said it has worked closely with Microsoft to build a service called Urge that will let listeners experiment with new music, as well as offer "original, hand-crafted content" from MTV and its other cable channels.

    Mmmm. Hand-crafted. I can see it now.

    The Cyber World

    A story about seven strangers who are chosen to live in a random data center. Their lives are recorded, e-mails are logged, and IMs are monitored. See what happens when people lose their Internet connection, and start getting REAL^H^H^H^HCYBER.

    Don't forget, next fall:

    The second season of DDoS'd.

    --
    This slashdot-related signature is a stub. You can help kihjin by expanding it.
  8. To paraphrase Top Gun... by Biomechanical · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "I feel the Urge, the urge to Purge*."

    * I.e. Vomit.

    Seriously, the world's biggest commercial software vendor getting it together with, possibly, the world's biggest icon of commercial music?!

    It's a match made in marketing heaven, and consumer hell.

    --
    His name is Robert Paulsen...
    1. Re:To paraphrase Top Gun... by TangoCharlie · · Score: 1

      I thought that was from the Burger King advert?

      It'll be interesting if Microsoft can follow the success of MSN with thier music service. Unfortunately, alomost everyone I know who uses MSN trashes thier PC within a few weeks. It seems like there's alot of malware floating about out there. Anyway... ... it'll also be interesting to see what DRM they're expecting to use. How long before Dvd Jon breaks it?! :-)

      --
      return 0; }
    2. Re:To paraphrase Top Gun... by amliebsch · · Score: 1
      Anyway... ... it'll also be interesting to see what DRM they're expecting to use. How long before Dvd Jon breaks it?! :-)

      Well, has DVD John gotten around to breaking the WMA DRM that Yahoo, Napster, and others use? Because that's probably what Microsoft will use.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    3. Re:To paraphrase Top Gun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not their target audience. The sheeple will eat it up and love it.

  9. Oh yea by theheff · · Score: 1, Funny

    Microsoft and MTV are basically already synonymous as it is... Bill Gates, P Diddy, Steve Ballmer, and Paris Hilton hit the clubs every night. Get with the times, yo. Microsoft sofware is just cool... that's why I bought it... you think I buy it for security?

  10. Sounds like by Avisto · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sounds more like ughh.

  11. Microsoft and MTV have joined forces? by megalogeek · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I have the Urge to cry...

  12. Urge.... by theheff · · Score: 1

    More like Surge... hopefully its demise will be even quicker than the soft drink.

  13. Videos? On MTV? Ha! by megalogeek · · Score: 1

    MTV is a very popular channel, but it's been a long time since I saw a video on it.

    Admittedly, I don't watch much MTV, but that's my experience.

  14. E+E=E by earthstar · · Score: 2, Funny
    Microsoft and MTV to Launch Music Service
    What do you get when you add 2 evil M's? Another Evil !
    They should have named the service 3E - for the third evil !
  15. Pricing by Nightspirit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If they charge $0.25 per song, or even approach allofmp3.com (although I doubt they'll go that low) I might actually start purchasing music online. Or allow my choice of format.

    If this service allows different formats (including lossless), is compatible with multiple players, has minimum DRM, and enters a pricewar with itunes it would be a good thing.

    I even might consider paying $1 a song if they sell FLAC or another lossless format.

    1. Re:Pricing by pryonic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't see that happening at all, the RIAA won't let them charge prices that low or get away without he same levels of DRM as everyone else. And if Microsoft get their way, it'll be a PlaysForSure store, so won't work on many players at all. It sounds like you're dreaming to me, but it's a good dream! Just wish it would become reality. Doubt it will though.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    2. Re:Pricing by mikkom · · Score: 1
      Or allow my choice of format.
      It's microsoft. I really doubt they will offer anything else than Windows media. And if they want to get big labels interested, there must also be some kind of DRM included.

      AllOfMp3 can do what it does only because the russian laws are a bit fuzzy about selling music on the internet.

      If I remember correctly, in some countries (all countries?) buying music from allofmp3 is legally the same as downloading content from p2p networks.
    3. Re:Pricing by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      even might consider paying $1 a song if they sell FLAC or another lossless format.

      apple only make $0.04 per song. the other $0.96 goes to the greedy RIAA bastards.

      If this service allows different formats (including lossless), is compatible with multiple players, has minimum DRM, and enters a pricewar with itunes it would be a good thing.

      prepare to be disappointed... it's wma format, a proprietary format, or death. personally. i choose the chicken sandwich.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    4. Re:Pricing by Nightspirit · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but if one thing MS is about, it's money. Most of the players out there are ipods, and feel free to correct me if I am wrong, but I don't believe ipods play wma files.

    5. Re:Pricing by eldavojohn · · Score: 1
      ... (although I doubt they'll go that low) ...
      Oh they can go that low. I've heard Microsoft takes huge losses in the game console market, why not the mp3 market?

      When you're stupid rich, sometimes going home and sticking thousand dollar bills in your ears or posing for Teen Beat magazine just isn't enough ...
      --
      My work here is dung.
    6. Re:Pricing by MiTasol · · Score: 1

      Not _all_ countries. Don't forget there are some developing nations who have yet to be conveniced to sign any copyright conventions.

    7. Re:Pricing by lysergic.acid · · Score: 0

      it has nothing to do with russian laws. the RIAA simply offers russian download sites a different rate for the music. they have regional pricing because people in a lot of countries can't afford to pay $0.99 for a song, or $24 for an album.

    8. Re:Pricing by mikkom · · Score: 1
      That's absolutely incorrect. RIAA has nothing to do with allofmp3 (hint: RIAA is an american institution). Please see this page page for more information.

      quote:
      Russian copyright legislation allows phonograms to be performed publicly without the authorization of the copyright owner for broadcasting and cable transmission. (Article 39) The Internet could be deemed to fall under this exemption. The copyrights involved have to be paid to a collecting society. This is the 'loophole' that is referred to in several articles on Allofmp3.
    9. Re:Pricing by Lussarn · · Score: 0

      Are most players iPods? In th US maybe but probably not anywhere else. In Europe cheap flashbased players can be had for close to nothing, like $30. Just as you can get a free gun for opening a bank account in the US you are quite likely to get a no brand MP3/WMA player in Europe.

      We also have nice looking non Apple MP3 players.

    10. Re:Pricing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I even might consider paying $1 a song if they sell FLAC or another lossless format.

      You're talking about a product from Microsoft and Viacom (parent company of MTV, Disney and ABC), you might as well say, "I even might consider paying $1 for a song if there's peace in the Middle East."

    11. Re:Pricing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll take it from your name, that you are on acid, a lot. I don't know where you got that tripe, but it is completely wrong.

    12. Re:Pricing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Viacom has nothing to do with either Disney or ABC.

    13. Re:Pricing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it funny that you don't seem to want bands paid.

      You use AllofMP3

      You quote figures that would actually leave LESS for bands once pure expense backend is paid even if you COMPLETELY cut out the label/RIAA.
      (remember micropayments don't exist ~20cents goes to the creditcard companies ALONE.)

    14. Re:Pricing by Metzli · · Score: 1

      According to a story this morning on NPR, this will support only Windows Media Player and only Windows. They've specifically said that OS X and iPods aren't supported. That sounds like great marketing, sell a service to the group that is the most prolific at buying iPods and don't support iPods.

      --
      "It's too bad stupidity isn't painful." - A. S. LaVey
    15. Re:Pricing by self+assembled+struc · · Score: 1

      i think you mean viacom. parent of:
      mtv
      vh1
      nickelodeon
      bet
      cbs
      upn
      paramount pictures
      simon and shuster
      comedy central
      spike tv
      cmt
      national amuesment themeparks
      infinity broadcasting (howard stern's soon to be former company)
      king world media (television production company)

      i know i'm probably forgetting a few things, but that's pretty much the scope of it.

      no disney. no abc. although disney does own abc.

      just not related to viacom in any way shape or form.

    16. Re:Pricing by RESPAWN · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We can dream, can't we? But the reality is that this is Microsoft. What you'll get will be DRM enabled, .wma format, crappy bitrate, lossy compression files that you'll only be able to play in Windows Media Player 10 and it's derivative and future versions.

      I didn't RTFA, but I'm sure they'll release a specialized "MSTV" player or some junk with a snazzy interface that will just use Windows Media Player on the back end. You'll only be able to use that piece of software to upload to your .wma compatible player. They'll make it easy for you to buy songs and even easier for you to buy your "MSTV" mobile audio device for added profit.

      Eventually - maybe 6 months from now or maybe a year from now - they'll follow along in Apple's footsteps and release music videos for sale on the service. However, this is MTV we're talking about, so the release of music videos on the service will be followed shortly by downloadable versions of all of MTV's popular shows. They'll make it very easy for you to download the latest Real World and Pimp My Ride programs to your "MSTV" Portable Windows Media Player. Eventually they'll follow up the release of MTV programs with other programs produced and/or owned by Viacom. This means Nickalodean, Comedy Central, and yes, even CBS.

      In the end, the service will win becuase Microsoft is the 800 lb. technology gorilla, and a partnership with MTV means gaining the mind share of the young & pre-teen demographic -- a demographic that is most likely very important to the online content distribution industry. This is a partnership that could very well challenge the dominance of Apple's iTMS in the market.

      I would like to say that I welcome our new digital content delivery overlords, but I don't. A merger like this one will mean that we'll probably have even less choice. I'm 95% certain that Urge (urge to what? choke myself?) will offer downloads and a variable price scheme carefully computed to maximize profit, especially in light of the surprising amount of purchasing power weilded by MTV's chosen demographic. And with the service "getting 'em while their young" we'll have a whole new generation of consumers who won't know anything about the advantages of .mp3, FLAC, and any other number of technologies which are far, far superior to the festering pile of shit that is .wma. They weild the marketing power and the cash reserves to flood the market with their cheap media players, which although not as cleverly designed as the iPod, will be cheap enough to entice consumers to purchase a portable Portable MSTV Windows Media Player, and I'm sure Urge won't work with anything else.

      For the record, I predicted this would happen not too long after iTunes was released. It's simply natural. I'd like to say that I'm proud to have predicted such an unholy partnership between two large corporate giants, but I'm not.

      You can just call me Cassandra from now on.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    17. Re:Pricing by westneat · · Score: 1

      You should check out emusic.com if you haven't already. They have $0.25 a song with no DRM at all, just straight up mp3s. The only downside is that it's mostly independant record labels, but there is still a metric fuck-ton of quality music.

    18. Re:Pricing by Pray_4_Mojo · · Score: 1

      You do realize this is Microsoft we're talking about...the company that famously doesn't "get video games" and yet releases a video game system....err..home media center...err...online service whatchamacallit 360.

      Combine this with "Music Television" that doesn't play music. Or, for that matter, "get" consumers. Teens watch it because every other teen is watching it. Thankfully years of public education has taught our future generations that they are what they own.

      And multi-tiered pricing? That's what they labels are doing to have more power over artists. Check out: http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2005/11/18.htm l (Article is Titled "Price As A Signal").

      It WILL be WMA.
      It WILL be chock full of DRM goodness.
      It WILL not have any music worth listening to for less the $.79 (realistically, maybe $.99 -- but something new and hot will be $2.00 because labels still think that everyone is a dumb as that idiot who spends $3.00 for a Green Day Ring Tone)
      It WILL NOT have a good ease of use or conveinence factor.
      it WILL NOT be compatible with existing devices (like the Xbox 360)
      It WILL be bundled with Vista, and even after you install iTunes, BitTorrent, eDonkey, and Limewire (for all your music needs of course) it will still pester you ALL THE TIME to buy their crap.

      The headline for this could be "Largest Software Monopoly and Largest Media Monopoly launch Doomed Venture, Destined to Profit."

    19. Re:Pricing by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      Meh, these pages controvert your claim:

      "They have a licensing agreement with the Russian Organization for Multimedia and Digital Systems which allows them to sell these songs in bulk; the same kind of agreement Russian radio stations have. By Russian standards, these prices are not unusual -- with much less disposable income available to the public, the only way to make money with music is to charge much less than elsewhere."
      http://www.infoanarchy.org/story/2004/4/30/2549/ 26021>

      "I'll start with my most definitive proof of the site's legality: the RIAA itself. For those who do not know, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) does not like file sharing. As was splayed on the front page of The New York Post , this is the organization that sued a 12-year-old girl living in public housing in New York City. Yet, when the RIAA cracked down on Spanish site PureTunes.com, which was also offering very discounted price for songs, they themselves acknowledged the legality of ALLOFMP3. PureTunes was targeted because they were reselling songs from ALLOFMP3, which was legally selling them for personal use."
      http://www.fadmine.com/allofmp3-legal-cheap-mp3s.h tml>

      However, upon further research, it does seem like the IFPI did try to shut them down before so you're probably right.

    20. Re:Pricing by shark72 · · Score: 1

      "apple only make $0.04 per song. the other $0.96 goes to the greedy RIAA bastards."

      Do you have citation for that $0.04? I was under the impression that Apple nets more on the order of $0.15 - $0.20 a song. I'm also pretty sure that the credit card card company gets a cut.

      The RIAA is a trade group representing the recording industry. My guess is that record companies pay the RIAA some sort of annual membership fee, but record stores don't pay a tithe directly to the RIAA. It's a bit like saying that your medical bill goes to the AMA.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    21. Re:Pricing by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      so here's the break down:

      $0.87 to the label
      $0.08 to the artist
      $0.04 to the distributer (apple)

      check it out.
      http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20040922-4219 .html

      and by the way, who are the members of the RIAA? the label execs. members of the RIAA get the cash. what are you, some RIAA member or something?

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  16. The subscription component is cool. by Empty+Yo · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I have a subscription with Audible and each month I can download two audio books for approx. 21 USD. In one month, I got two books that would have cost me over 60 USD on iTunes to get. If MS and MTV keep up that idea with subscription pricing, i.e. cheaper than if you bought the products a la carte, then it might actually be a good idea.

    Of course, that would just leave them the difficult task of coming up with something I want to order in the first place. More top 40 stuff like there is today and no amount of money will entice me to the service.

    --
    I'll tolerate anything except intolerance.
  17. The real question is.... by Chris+Bradshaw · · Score: 3, Informative
    I think the real question is wether or not they will be able to offer music from ALL labels. The way I see it, the major draw back to ITunes is the fact that any music on the SONY/BMG label is not available...

    More Info on the matter:

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/11/16/parallel_i mports_australia/

    --
    Get your Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool Here for FREE! - http://fedora.redhat.com
    1. Re:The real question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody keeps mentioning the Register.
      It's not like they are the definite source of truth.
      Sure it can be seen as a reference, but.....

      I'll stop now.

    2. Re:The real question is.... by sanyasi · · Score: 1

      and Sony/BMG should jump onto iTunes quickly, cause nobody with any sense is going to be buying those CDs and sticking them in a computer to put the songs on their iPods

    3. Re:The real question is.... by node+3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think the real question is wether or not they will be able to offer music from ALL labels. The way I see it, the major draw back to ITunes is the fact that any music on the SONY/BMG label is not available...

      Not available... in Australia. The article doesn't mention whether it will be a US-only launch, or a world-wide launch, but these things tend to be US-only at first.

      Which means it's most probable that Urge will not have more music available than iTunes no matter where you live.

      It seems odd to me that a company would not want their music available for purchase as widely as possible. After all, a $0.99 iTunes (Wal-Mart, Napster, Real, etc) download is worth more than a $0 fileshare download. But if there was going to be a hold-out, it would be Sony, wouldn't it? (they could have owned the entire market that iTunes and the iPod now hold, if they hadn't been so paranoid)

    4. Re:The real question is.... by akhomerun · · Score: 1

      i wish i was in australia so i could have an itunes without sony/bmg

      seriously, why would i want to buy from them? i will never buy a sony/bmg record again (rootkit).

  18. Hat-pullOutRabbit() by Fiar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They're going to have to make this something special to compete with existing online music services. Napster has a subscription service, as well as a "Napster-to-go" scheme whereby users can put music onto compatible mobile devices. This supports WMA DRM seeing as it uses Windows Media Player 10 tech, so it's not like MS can claim exclusive compatibility with that without cutting out the whole Rhapsody range of services. The other main service at the moment is iTunes, which caters for a per-track market, and it the only thing that works with iPods as far as I know. Due to the methods iPods deal with files and DRM, Microsoft won't be able to offer music for those either.

    As for the "Original Hand-Crafted content", won't that simply be MTV videos? iTunes already has "a range of music videos and television shows"

    It seems to me that MS are trying to fill a hole that's already been covered...

    1. Re:Hat-pullOutRabbit() by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are 3rd party choices for putting music on your
      ipod inluding, now, even RealPlayer- scary as that is.

      Still no DRM'ed .wma though.

    2. Re:Hat-pullOutRabbit() by node+3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It seems to me that MS are trying to fill a hole that's already been covered...

      Wow. If you think about it, that is the best one-sentence description of Microsoft ever written.

      It's true on so many levels, it's almost Zen.

    3. Re:Hat-pullOutRabbit() by danpsmith · · Score: 0
      It seems to me that MS are trying to fill a hole that's already been covered...

      Otherwise known as their business strategy. Every one of the markets they've entered into was already covered by usually superior products. Once they formed a monopoly with Windows, they've used it to stretch their arms into every market available slowly but surely.

      Netscape was fine as a browser, IE came in sporting a default Windows install and blew it out of the water competition wise.

      MS didn't even really have a modern day media player until a few years ago. Now pretty much everyone that knows little-to-nothing about computers just runs media player and nothing else.

      MS didn't have a line of PDAs until Palmpilots became big.

      MS didn't touch on a lot of markets and nobody seemed to notice.

      What happens is this: MS waits for a market to show worth and expand. Then it comes into the market with a pretty much sub-standard service/product that always contains more compatibility with Windows or more integration because they control Windows. Everyone buys the new versions of Windows and doesn't even know the service exists, until MS puts it in their face with the OS.

      I'm just surprised MSN hasn't taken all of the IM market (and kind of glad, but AIM is kind of a POS too).

      So just the fact that they enter a market late is meaningless. They can squash the competition with their monopoly. And in this case, they are teaming up with MTV who has a monopoly over most of the youth as far as TV programming. Unless there's something else I'm not seeing, this is a battle MS can easily win.

      --
      Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
  19. booo by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

    instead of "joined forces to form Urge", should have said "merged to form Urge". and yes, i do love watching dateline nbc.

    1. Re:booo by GoatMonkey2112 · · Score: 1

      Let me guess your favorite movie quote. It's from Top Gun, "I feel the need, the need for speed!".

    2. Re:booo by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      in 5th grade, it was my motto!

  20. Better than Sony by Tenk101 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Depite all the likely flames about big global beasties taking over the world, what's really so bad about this. Consider what happens if Sony ever succeeds in this area and end up with control of the Artist right through to the device, then there just isn't any consumer choice, Artists are forced to sign up with Sony and consumers are forced to sign up with Sony devices.

    On the counter-side you have a big evil software/device multinational (MS) doing a partnership with essentially a large music content provider (MTV). Despite the short term anomaly that Apple is causing it probably takes a partnership like this to actually have some threat to Sony without forcing every artist onto one label and closing the industry completely.

    1. Re:Better than Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're underplaying Apple's role and overplaying Sony's, I think.

      The iPod is what's driving digital music at the moment. Sony are nowhere.

    2. Re:Better than Sony by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Depite all the likely flames about big global beasties taking over the world, what's really so bad about this. Consider what happens if Sony ever succeeds in this area and end up with control of the Artist right through to the device, then there just isn't any consumer choice, Artists are forced to sign up with Sony and consumers are forced to sign up with Sony devices.

      So your argument is that it is likely that Sony will leverage their non-monopoly music business (part of a cartel) and their non-monopoly hardware business to forma a monopoly on hardware and music. And you think this is more likely than the possibility that MS, who has a monopoly, will be able to leverage that monopoly to gain a music distribution monopoly. Here's a clue. If Sony tries to take over the music distribution business, they have to fight not only Apple but all their RIAA partners. If MS wants to take over the music business they just have to leverage their existing monopoly. Can you say, "free three year subscription with each copy of Windows?" I knew you could. Sony is a threat to the free market as part of a cartel and as a huge player, but they are unlikely to be able to simultaneously suppress all the other hardware and music distribution companies. Aside from Apple's format, MS has already taken over the legal music distribution format. That's right, if not for Apples strategic move, all music would be distributed in a format completely controlled by MS already. How far is it from there to discriminatory licensing of that format compared to MS's own use in their own service? MS is the much larger threat right now.

  21. Another killer? by Pliep · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Right until now, not a single iPod-killer has killed an iPod (yet). My take is this is because of the integration between iPod and iTunes plus the ease of use that comes out of this. One-click == "buy and put on computer and on iPod". Or indeed one-click == "rip this entire CD and put on computer and on iPod including correct tracknames".

    Will the combination of a music network and a software company that does not make MP3 players beat this? Sounds more like massive advertising opportunities rather than building an iPod/iTunes killer.

    1. Re:Another killer? by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      It's all to do with usability for the average guy/gal. There's the aspect you've talked about, and also the aesthetic aspect.

      I don't know about the netherlands, but here in the UK, mobile phones are often sold on aesthetics, not features, something which often is a big point to women rather than men. Next time you see a VW Beetle, check out who the driver is. I've not yet seen a woman with an iRiver or a Creative player, but plenty with iPods.

    2. Re:Another killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one-click to rip a CD.. oh wait you must be on a MAC. Cause Itunes crashes in windows. So far I have checked with over 50 people who have the same problem. I use a different program to rip the CD then copy the MP3s with the tags into Itunes. When ripping a CD iTunes works for a few songs, then an error pops up and crases iTunes. I wish that iTunesworked on linux. Mac is BSD clone now, why not release a version for linux? Wait, it that happened, then there might be more then one 'working' version on iTunes.

      Paying all that money for average hardware is too much.

      so either some windows update is screwing with iTunes or the new iTunes is all messed up on windows. Abd no one will say bad apple since apple can do no wrong.

  22. MTV is mistaken by Pliep · · Score: 2, Insightful
    forgot to say in my other post:

    MTV is very much mistaken. 90% of their viewers either want an iPod or have one. Hell, almost every hiphop video bling-blings an iPod around. "Urge" seems to block Macs and iPods. All very lovely, but MTV fails to recognise their target market if you ask me.

    1. Re:MTV is mistaken by DreadfulGrape · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Indeed. From the Boston Globe coverage on this same story:

      URGE will not be compatible with Macintosh computers or iPods.

      Sorry, but URGE == DOA. Or, put another way, MSMTV will be about as successful as MSNBC.

      --
      sig has been sent away for a few small repairs...
  23. has a lot of promise by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

    MTV has a lot of sway with the younger market, they aren't going after us. and they r quite good at marketing to their target demographic. i know there is a serious lack of details, but i also know that two wrongs make a right..

    1. Re:has a lot of promise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How young is the "younger market"? Small children who haven't quite made it out of Jung's stages and are banging the remote against a table trying to make it stop?

  24. Re:You mean? by jax_max · · Score: 0

    MTV = Microsoft TV ?

  25. This is SO AWESOME!!! by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dude, this is SO AWESOME. Finally, someone is combining the best things on Earth... Microsoft's quality software and MTV's quality music!!!

    Now, if only they could toss Wal*mart and McDonald's into the mix!

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    1. Re:This is SO AWESOME!!! by killjoe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dude, Apple is going to DIE. Nobody will be buying ipods anymore, iTunes will shut down any day now!!!!. MS has entered the online music market and they will KILL everybody else!. Remember microsoft-at-work? It will be just like that!

      --
      evil is as evil does
    2. Re:This is SO AWESOME!!! by westneat · · Score: 1

      Dude, I'm going to totally use my McDonald's Arch card to buy MTV's music on Microsoft's software.

    3. Re:This is SO AWESOME!!! by Sangbin · · Score: 1

      My local Wal-Mart already has a McDonald in the store.

    4. Re:This is SO AWESOME!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, It's wonderful
      I have been trying the closed beta of this music service. I downloaded "Developers, developers, developers" and "Ops, I did it again (Chair mix)" by some guy called Steve Ballmer and I'm so happy of it

      Kudos for Microsoft!

  26. So... by Cherita+Chen · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Does this mean that in a few years, you will no longer be able to download music from them? I can already see it... They'll go from offering music, to only offering audio programs in the likeness of "The Real World", "Punked", "Jackass", "Pimp my Ride", "Made", etc, etc, etc...

    And of course, all of this will be sprinkled with advertisments for Mountain Dew, Microsoft, and Slim Jim.

    --
    I'm not fat, just big boned...
  27. One-stop non-shopping.. by McNally · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm psyched about this. Microsoft and MTV are two of the high-profile music-industry players that I have the least interest in doing business with. If they can partner with Sony and its DRM suppliers and hire a few RIAA execs I can have all the big players I want to avoid in one place for convenient one-stop non-shopping.. Obviously they've hired one of more of the naming & branding consultants whose work I despise, that's a nice bonus..

    Seriously, though, it's very nostalgic to see MTV get back into the music business. I just hope they remember how it works, it's been, what, fifteen years now since they gave it up to make low-budget drama programs and reality television?

  28. Re:Discrimination? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    yes

    yes

    maybe

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  29. No worries... by KingSkippus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm just glad that someone here realized what the hell I was talking about in spite of the Redundant mod. Apparently, too many folks here haven't actually watched MTV since the 1980's. Oh well, can't say I blame 'em.

    They'll figure it out soon enough, though. I wonder how long it will be before this new online music service only has content about pimping cars, playing jokes on people, weird people forced to share a house, and so on instead of, well, you know... music.

    1. Re:No worries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the saddest moments of my childhood TV experience was the downfall of MTV (I guess it was actually the rise of it...)

      The earliest I can remember, they played music videos most of the time. Then they started adding a few shows to the mix when they realized they could gain more of an audience doing so. Fine - as long as it was still edgy and music themed. I loved beavis and butthead AND they still had music videos during it. Then, slowly, they started replacing more and more of the music with music themed stuff and they started to get poppier. I stopped watching it then, but as I understand it they made a bunch of those disney people big (like britney spears) and they have a bunch of reality tv now.

      Something I think the best way to target MTV's coveted 12-16 age group is to get a lobotomy.

    2. Re:No worries... by Shihar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Too bad it isn't just MTV that sucks. Have you tried watching the Discovery Channel? When in the hell did science become purely about building fucking motorcycle. I swear that they play absolutely nothing except motorcycle building reality TV shows and the occasional MythBusters. It makes me fucking hate TV. I can't wait until the day that everything is on demand. I figure once everything is on demand one of two things will happen:

      1) The good shows will get their moment in the sun and execs won't be able to kill them. It will be clear that people like good programing, not the latest reality TV crap fest. I am happy as good shows become easy to find and I never half to even flip past a shitty show again.

      2) All the good shows get killed because most people are dim witted idiots that love the latest shit flung at us by execs. I never ever watch a shitty show again because I give up TV. As a positive side effect, I will also never worry about low voter turn out in the US as it is clear the shit flinging idiots probably shouldn't be mucking up the system with their inane opinion as to who should be the leader.

    3. Re:No worries... by MPHellwig · · Score: 1

      Don't worry about option 1, people that appreciate shit shows have no need for on-demand, their problem is that they don't know what to want and therefore appreciate predigested shit :-).
      But what you do have to worry about is that because of this reason on-demand TV may not be financial interesting to the big commercial companies which likely want to prevent on-demand to brake through because they lose market share to the smaller companies for which on-demand TV is financial interesting. But once bandwith is plenty for anyone, this problem solves itself.

    4. Re:No worries... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      I found myself unoccupied at 7pm the other day, and so I switched to Discovery Wings. What was on? Worlds Best Cars. What. The. FUCK? Three episodes of that, one ancient 'Flying through Time' episode and then its all repeated. Absolutely pointless for an aviation enthusiasts channel.

    5. Re:No worries... by greysky · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lewis Black put it best:

      "MTV is to music what KFC is to chicken."

    6. Re:No worries... by jsight · · Score: 1

      At least you still get Discovery Wings. In the US, it has been replaced with the "Discovery Military" channel.

    7. Re:No worries... by grub · · Score: 3, Interesting


      When in the hell did science become purely about building fucking motorcycle.

      I cancelled my cable because of this, there's a journal entry about it somewhere. If you want science shows you're pretty much stuck with NOVA. Commercial TV panders to the lowest common denominator.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    8. Re:No worries... by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 1

      Yeah - discovery seems to be dedicated to the "I'm a Cracker at heart" audience.

      All of cable seems to be filled with shit like Bounty Hunter families, chopper buildes, hotrod builders, "Buncha Kids in a House", four sports networks, four right-wing loudspeakers, and endless "dating" and gossip shows.

      Hey! Instead of improving the delivery with digital cable and HDTV, how about improving the CONTENT? I went to basic cable from premium, and will ala carte my six local channels, once that's an option. I don't pay people to shit in my house.

      --
      "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    9. Re:No worries... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      The #1 download will be the BAM podcast. sounds and screaming of BAM's adventures.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    10. Re:No worries... by tsa · · Score: 1

      O no, not that bad! I went to KFC in 1998 or so and I still haven't recovered. They do things to chickens you don't want your worst enemy to suffer.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    11. Re:No worries... by SamTheButcher · · Score: 1

      Myself, I thought it was a good pairing. Now we can watch *both* MTV and M$ ride the "we-obviously-don't-get-it-anymore" train to obscurity.

    12. Re:No worries... by sobachatina · · Score: 1
      They do things to chickens you don't want your worst enemy to suffer.

      Being killed, plucked, breaded, deep fried, and eaten? I agree it would be inhumane to do to an enemy but to a chicken it isn't that bad.

    13. Re:No worries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Mr. Lahey? Is that you??

      Don't let those shidiots bother you Mr. Lahey!

      Randy.

    14. Re:No worries... by tsa · · Score: 1

      That's nothing. At KFC they cover your remains with some greasy foul-tasting gruel before deep frying them. Now THAT's inhumane! Or should I say, inanimalane?

      --

      -- Cheers!

    15. Re:No worries... by Rac3r5 · · Score: 1

      dude.. u are so right..

      at first I was like cool.. they're building a bike from scratch.. nice stuff.. but then it went on and on and now cars.. and now I just don't watch discovery at all...

      being able to pick what shows I want to watch.. instead of a bunch of reality shows would be really cool..

    16. Re:No worries... by kiddailey · · Score: 1

      A while back, Discovered moved all the good ole' Discovery Channel stuff to the more refined Science Channel. No motorcycles there :)

  30. Not a Microsoft Server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it just me or is it strange that the www.urge.com server is not running a Microsoft Server?

    HTTP/1.0 200 OK
    Server: Netscape-Enterprise/4.1

    1. Re:Not a Microsoft Server by grimJester · · Score: 1

      Two questions: a) How old is Netscape-Enterprise/4.1 and b) How long until that server has hello.jpg on the front page?

    2. Re:Not a Microsoft Server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's just you. Who gives a fuck what server someone runs? It's probably just hosted on some large ISP or on some web agencys server. Nobody gives a flying fuck what webserver you use!

    3. Re:Not a Microsoft Server by HTL2001 · · Score: 1

      you don't necissarily have to hack the server, you can have a worm that uses spyware-like tactics of changing the hosts file. Considering anyone who uses this service wouldn't be a mac user, and probably be an inept user, the writer would probably be successful

      (engage conspirasy theory mode)
      maybe this worm will be written by the russian mafia running allofmp3.com!
      (conspirasy theory mode off)

      (I dont actually think allofmp3 is operated by the russian mafia btw)

      --
      By reading this, you have given me brief control of your mind.
  31. Indies? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Now is the time to put together a package for musicians to build their own CDs and mp3 sites. If that gets done cheap (perhaps as an OSS set-up), AND a bit of marketing is done, this could really expand.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  32. MS-MTV? by OffTheLip · · Score: 1

    First they merge with adult TV programming with MS-NBC to insure US news is fair and objective. Now they want to do the same for the MTV generation(s). At least Microsoft does not limit predetory practices to software anymore. Diversification is the key to survival.

  33. Stupid Unless... by Shihar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is going to be a failed experiment by MTV and Microsoft unless they realize what Apple has that no one else does. Appple has control of the iPod. If you have an iPod, you can't use DRMed WMA. If MTV and Microsoft think that they are going to make a substantial profit off in the saturated field of non-iPod MP3 players, they are insane. The money is in a service that can compete for the iPod, in addition to other MP3 players.

    What MTV and Microsoft has to do to get their foot in the door is offer a service that works with iPods AND offers a different pricing model then iTunes. That is the only way they can possibly compete with iTunes. Anything short of this is going to result in them fighting every other online music company for that tiny sliver of remaining non-iPod users.

    I personally would jump at an all you can eat service for my iPod. Hell, I would jump at any sort of pricing options that or ability to escapes AAC lock in for my iPod. I got my iPod as a gift. I would love it if there was a way to escape Apple's monopoly short of throwing out a $300 piece of equipment. If MTV and Microsoft, as much as I loath the both of them, can do it I'll jump. It isn't like I have any love for Apple either.

    If they have a plan to defeat Apple, then this will be newsworthy. If they are just jumping in on Napster's model and hoping to sell via the shitty MTV brand, this is a yawner that no one is going to give a shit about.

    1. Re:Stupid Unless... by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I personally would jump at an all you can eat service for my iPod. Hell, I would jump at any sort of pricing options that or ability to escapes AAC lock in for my iPod. I got my iPod as a gift. I would love it if there was a way to escape Apple's monopoly short of throwing out a $300 piece of equipment.

      Something wrong with allofmp3.com?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Stupid Unless... by Psiren · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Something wrong with allofmp3.com?

      Ask the artists whose music they sell...

    3. Re:Stupid Unless... by 605dave · · Score: 1

      People always mention allofmp3 as if it is some legal alternative. It is not. If you want to avoid DRM, buy the CD and rip it. Better quality anyway.

      --
      Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a difficult battle. - Plato
    4. Re:Stupid Unless... by Jussi+K.+Kojootti · · Score: 1
      Let's see... The music industry does not give me the service I want, but instead just tells me to bend over again and again (high prices, DRM, preventing fair use by technical and political means, non-standard "standards" all over the place, cartels), and justifies all this with "Hey, copyright is copyright: we're the good guys 'cause everything we do is legal.".

      Fuck, I can play that game too. Allofmp3 is legal and follows Russian copyright law. If the music industry doesn't want to abide that law, then they shouldn't do business in Russia. I'm sorry some artists will end up making less because of that, but... maybe they shouldn't be part of the problem?

      Just for the record: The extensive song collection on my computer is 100% legal. It will stay that way, except if I happen to buy music which has a copy prevention system that I have to break to rip it (another "bend over, it's the law" by the music industry).

    5. Re:Stupid Unless... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "ability to escapes AAC lock in for my iPod."

      It's called eBay. There are doubtless hundreds that would pay well to be in that AAC lock you're looking to escape.

    6. Re:Stupid Unless... by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      If MTV and Microsoft, as much as I loath the both of them, can do it I'll jump. It isn't like I have any love for Apple either.But of course they cannot, and it's not their fault. Apple owns the patent on their FairPlay DRM (the only DRM the ipod can use) and will not license it to anyone else unless forced to by antitrust lawsuits. Sorry, loyal Apple consuming unit, it is Apple and Apple alone that is coring you.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    7. Re:Stupid Unless... by m50d · · Score: 1

      Because I'm sure they're so happy with what they get from everywhere else.

      --
      I am trolling
    8. Re:Stupid Unless... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Actually there are programs that will convert it to mp3 easily and cleanly.

      I use one to convert my audible files to mp3

      it's called DB PowerAMP music converter

      works great with the right plugins.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    9. Re:Stupid Unless... by idsofmarch · · Score: 1
      Try emusic.com, 9.99 per month gets you 40 downloads, all sans DRM.

      Oh, and they're Mp3s!

      --
      Anyone who whines about being modded down should be.
  34. Nothing learnt from Europe's antitrust case? by xonen · · Score: 1

    A $500.000 fine, a release of XP without media player.. And microsoft just ignores it and continues whatever it likes to do..
    Apple will probably not take any legal action because Apple is partly owned by microsoft..
    If microsoft offers a new service, ok.. If it comes preinstalled with Vista (just like their other MSN and mediaplayer crapware), they may create a serious problem here in europe.. And a reason more not to install vista.

    --
    A glitch a day keeps the bugs away.
    1. Re:Nothing learnt from Europe's antitrust case? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple will probably not take any legal action because Apple is partly owned by microsoft..

      Um, no...Microsoft sold their non-voting shares of Apple a while ago...are you just making stuff up?
      Well, this is slashdot...

    2. Re:Nothing learnt from Europe's antitrust case? by xonen · · Score: 1
      Well, i missed that one (about Apple). About the stuff being included in Vista, i did not make that up, it is what a dutch newssite reports:
      http://webwereld.nl/articles/38816
      Microsoft ontwikkelt samen met MTV een muziekdienst genaamd Urge. De iTunes-tegenhanger komt standaard in de opvolger van Windows XP, Vista, te zitten.

      Translated: "Urge will be included in the follow-up of XP, Vista"
      --
      A glitch a day keeps the bugs away.
    3. Re:Nothing learnt from Europe's antitrust case? by mkiwi · · Score: 1
      Apple will probably not take any legal action because Apple is partly owned by microsoft..

      Actually, Microsoft sold its shares of Apple long ago (and may I add at a substantial profit). Apple DID sign a contract with MS that they would not pursue some technologies, such as voice recognition, but nothing in the deal included an online music store or anything related to the iPod.

    4. Re:Nothing learnt from Europe's antitrust case? by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      '' Apple will probably not take any legal action because Apple is partly owned by microsoft.. ''

      I'd really like to know where you got that information from. This seems to be like one of these viruses or bacteria that can stay in the ground frozen for ten years and spring up again and can't be killed. So please tell us: Where did you read this and when, or where did you hear it?

  35. Dante's Inferno! by farrellj · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great, a Music Video station that doesn't show music videos anymore, teaming up with a software company that no longer produces good software. Did Dante dream this up? What rung of hell am I in now?!?!?

    ttyl
              Farrell

    --
    CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    1. Re:Dante's Inferno! by faedle · · Score: 1

      "No longer" produces good software?

      Was there ever any Microsoft-produced software that was "good"?

      MS-DOS don't count. They bought that, and IBM was responsible for a lot of the "goodness" that was MS-DOS 5.0.

    2. Re:Dante's Inferno! by farrellj · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you remember Microsoft BASIC? It was a very good implementation of it. As well, the original Micorsoft Word, under DOS, was a good word-processor. What is Word (for Windows) today wasn't even written my Microsoft, but a company in Toronto.

      ttyl
                Farrell

      --
      CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
  36. Wait... by BumpyCarrot · · Score: 1

    How many music services does MS have now? 3? Or is that just me?

    --
    Do you see what I did there?
  37. I'm scared. by mattpointblank · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I really fear for modern music. Not sure how well the /. community is familiar with guitar tabbing, but it's essentially an ASCII way of rendering guitar music that even AOLers can understand. Now all the major tab sites are being forced to close or remove all tabs for signed artists due to a new music industry function. It's insane; how are such things possibly hurting the bands? Similarly, Microsoft and MTV are two corporations (a word that has nothing to do with music) that really don't appear to understand music as anything more than a marketable economy, which is just sad. Just like Orwell said the hope is in the Proles, for music, the hope is in the indies.

    1. Re:I'm scared. by deetsay · · Score: 1
      I really fear for modern music. Not sure how well the /. community is familiar with guitar tabbing, but it's essentially an ASCII way of rendering guitar music that even AOLers can understand. Now all the major tab sites are being forced to close or remove all tabs for signed artists due to a new music industry function.
      If they really could get a significant amount of tabs taken off the net and stop them circulating around on paper (and they really can't), I doubt it would hurt modern music much. Just more people will have to learn to listen and figure out the tabs out of songs for themselves... And that could actually lead to a positive effect on their musical abilities. :-)
      It's insane; how are such things possibly hurting the bands?
      Apparently sanity has nothing to do with it. After they're done with the lyrics and tabs, sooner or later they will sue a fan for putting a band's logo up on a fanpage (without signing up for the official fanclub, for instance)...
      Similarly, Microsoft and MTV are two corporations (a word that has nothing to do with music) that really don't appear to understand music as anything more than a marketable economy, which is just sad. Just like Orwell said the hope is in the Proles, for music, the hope is in the indies.
      Indeed. I bet they will just go wild and shoot themselves in the foot with some unbelievable DRM scam.
      --
      "The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand", or so I have read.
    2. Re:I'm scared. by mattpointblank · · Score: 1
      If they really could get a significant amount of tabs taken off the net and stop them circulating around on paper (and they really can't), I doubt it would hurt modern music much. Just more people will have to learn to listen and figure out the tabs out of songs for themselves... And that could actually lead to a positive effect on their musical abilities. :-)
      That's just it. mxtabs.com is down, taborama.com won't show anything signed.. It's definitely had an effect. I appreciate your point about it improving people's abilities, but my point is that what harm are they causing in the first place?
      After they're done with the lyrics and tabs, sooner or later they will sue a fan for putting a band's logo up on a fanpage
      Only one thing to say to that: http://www.theonion.com/content/node/43029/
    3. Re:I'm scared. by deetsay · · Score: 1
      That's just it. mxtabs.com is down, taborama.com won't show anything signed.. It's definitely had an effect. I appreciate your point about it improving people's abilities, but my point is that what harm are they causing in the first place?
      I was half kidding, and I definitely don't appreciate the industry for what they're doing to those helpful sites. And I'm not a regular user of any site like that, so I don't know if maybe some actually great and reliable resources have been lost...

      But I have looked up some tabs and notes and especially lyrics with Google, and there always seems to be *lots* of hits in all kinds of sites, all over the world, and most of them are various people's home pages. And you always have to go through many of those to find a correct version. :-) Can they cease & decist them all? I don't think so. I hope not. Especially not this one.
      --
      "The looser the waistband, the deeper the quicksand", or so I have read.
  38. oh good, so it's not just me by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

    did you suddenly feel an urge to vomit as well?

  39. Cool! by jswalter9 · · Score: 1

    Do you suppose they'll have a linux client available?

    --
    Retired from software... maybe. Sort of.
    1. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's called "BitTorrent".

  40. MS iPod? by coredump-0x00001 · · Score: 0

    Sounds like MS might be developing a portable mp3/wm(av) player. Attempt at an ipod killer? .......... Mtv and MS, sounds like a scary combination! Imagine the super DRM powers vista will inherit as a result.

  41. MTV ? by Tom · · Score: 1

    If this is anything close to the MTV we get over here in Germany, then the only thing they'll offer will be ring tones for your cell phone. But 25 billion of those.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  42. Not Music but Culture by millahtime · · Score: 1

    MTV is no longer all about Music. They now ingrain a culture on their loyal followers. The President of MTV has said that he has more influence on children than their own parents do.

    Look at that culture.... the real world... fighting, craziness, and whoring .. the beach house.... people all over each other in skimpy swimsuits talkin about how they are fooling around together... (all be it fun but is that really good for 13 year old kids to aspire to be like this)

    1. Re:Not Music but Culture by reedsr · · Score: 1

      all be it fun but is that really good for 13 year old kids to aspire to be like this

      I remember a time when i was much younger that MTV did show music videos, and that was mostly what they showed but for about the last 10 years it has been complelty overrun with reality shows that aren't reality. I know poeple my age (23) that have grown up watching the programming on MTV and now think that the real world is how life is supposed to be. They translate the behaviors they have seen on these shows and act that way in real life.

      What alot of people that watch this trash don't realize is (and the producers of these shows have admitted) is that alot of the shows content is prompted, re-enacted if the cameras miss it, and taken out of context to make it seem more outrageous than it really is. The best part is that the biggest fans, when told about this, deny that any of it is not original and untouched by editing

      --
      "Is Sausage bad for printers?"
  43. Vision of the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lossy 128kbps WMA, variable pricing, 2.99, 1.99, 99c per song. 2.99+ for a video (lossy audio, 96kbps, WMV video).

    chances of FLAC, or any kind of lossless codec? Equal to the service using MP3 and having 25 cent downloads, which is equal to the chances of Microsoft adding trial CDs of Red Hat in with every box of XP.

    1. Re:Vision of the future by Nightspirit · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately your vision is more likely than mine.

  44. Microsoft + MTV by ThePengwin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lets combine the two and what do u get??

    very expensive Emo Mp3s that crash your computer and advertise every chance they get

    sounds pretty convincing.......

  45. Launch Date by mattwarden · · Score: 2, Funny

    The company gave no specifics on launch date beyond saying it would be sometime in 2006.

    For those not paying close attention, please note that this is a Microsoft launch date. You'll be lucky if you can still hear music by the time they actually get this launched.

    1. Re:Launch Date by HermDog · · Score: 1
      You'll be lucky if you can still hear music by the time they actually get this launched.
      This is a story about Microsoft teaming up with MTV. What music are you talking about?
      --
      JADBP
  46. The Borg expands again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just another case of Bill Gates trying to horn in where someone else is making money. Money he feels is rightfully his. Everytime some product or service is successful, Gates moves in and sucks all the oxygen out the space and runs all the inovators out and rebrands it and then makes it incompatible with anything else. Soon after SP-whatever you have to buy yet another version to keep up with the flow of before mentioned services and product that now only come out of Redmond.

    I'm surprised that there isn't already a M$ branded online auction site and credit card service like eBay and PayPal. Browsers, word processors, compilers and computer languages, dozens of internet technologies, and on and on. If someone discovers a technology and becomes successful, Gates will figure out a way to weasel his way into the space and take over.

  47. huh? by akhomerun · · Score: 1

    #1 microsoft already has a music store
    #2 since when did MTV have anything to do with music?

  48. Interesting!!! by abhikhurana · · Score: 1

    Last year the CEO of MTV Europe visited my buinsess school and at that time I had asked him if they wanted to enter the online music business, with all the brand awareness, the reach and all. To this he replied that MTV wasn't even remotely interested in this business, with its low profit margins and volumes .He even accused apple of cross subsidizing their music sales with ipod sales and hence making the price point ($0.99 per song) unattractive for most pleayers. Basically he went on and on about how much you have to pay the music studios per song, the number of songs you can sell in a year and how overall the business will be really small, and how MTV would rather use its resources elsewhere. It actually made sense at that time. So assuming that the economics of the music business haven't really changed, I wonder what has changed? Could it be that Microsoft is just using MTV's reach to push wma, for which it gets licensing fee from all the companies that sell mp3 players with support for wma and ensuring that those companies dont switch to some alternate standard?

  49. Wouldn't that be a Dell DJ? by JackAxe · · Score: 1

    Kidding of course.

    I can only imagine a MS iPod wannabe over-heating occasionally in the winter time, and damaging the internal HD if tilted. But the headphones will have a cool "on" button with little lights to tell you when the unit is not functioning. :)

    MS couldn't even get their first store right, so I have little faith that they'll gain any real ground this time around, kind of like their game console in Japan. :)

  50. We choose to go to the moon by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    Sounds like MS aknowledges they can't beat Apple in audio, and go directly for music videos. I don't like MTV's music. But, like it or not, we are not their audience and when it comes to music videos, MTV is a strong player.

  51. Terrible name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You want to market to Millenials, you have to have a brand that is edgy and in your face, and must include the words Extreme, Ultimate, or Look at Me Daddy. It has to exude counter-culture... not real counter-culture, but pseudo-counter-culture that those "viral" marketing hucksters peddle.

    Millenials are so consumed with being revolutionary, but in reality they are marketed to at every turn and are quick to consume everything that they THINK is different than what their parents had. Yeah, enjoy that Boost Mobile phone and Amp'D beverage... no, they're not mega-corp products, are they?

  52. "Money For Microsoft" by Dire Warning by NZheretic · · Score: 1
    The realization that to get DRM'ed content will require you to do so though Windows XP and/or Microsoft ...

    [ With deepest apologies to Mark Knofler and Dire Straits ]

    "Money for Microsoft" by Dire Warning
    Sung by Steve Ballmer, backing by Bill Gates

    You must buy ... You must buy Win-XP

    You must buy ... You must buy Win-XP

    You must buy ... You must buy Win-XP

    You must buy ... You must buy Win-XP

    Now look at them bozo's that's the way you do it
    You lock them always on the Win-XP
    That ain't workin' thats the way we do it
    Money for Microsoft from Dot Net usage fees
    Now that ain't workin' thats the way we do it
    Lemme tell ya them guys are dumb
    Maybe get a licence on your little desktop
    Maybe get a licence on everyone

    They gotta install Media Player
    Passport Dot-Net deliveries
    They gotta take these applications
    They gotta take these subscription fees

    Look at that, look at that

    See the little Win-Troll spreading spin we makeup
    Yeah buddy thats our own fear
    That little Win-Troll got them always complain'
    That little Win-Troll makes us billionares

    They gotta install Media Player
    Passport Dot-Net deliveries
    They gotta take these applications
    They gotta take these subscription fees

    They shoulda learned to use the Linux
    They shoulda learned to use them Macs
    Look at that user, we got it stickin' to the customer
    Man we could have some fun
    And their down there, whats that? Protesting noises?
    Plannin' on me dancing like a chimpanzee
    That ain't workin' thats the way we do it
    Get the money for Microsoft get our usage fee

    They gotta install Media Player
    Passport Dot-Net deliveries
    They gotta take these applications
    They gotta take these subscription fees

    That ain't workin' thats the way we do it
    You lock them always on the Win-XP
    That ain't workin' thats the way we do it
    Money for Microsoft from the license fee
    Money for Microsoft from subscription fees

    David Mohring - Original author

    See: A plea for relief from Microsoft's escalating anti-competitive tactics.
    An open letter to antitrust, competition, consumer and trade practice monitoring agency officials worldwide.

  53. The whole service on a Thumb Drive by Solo-Malee · · Score: 1

    So let me get this right, this is the MTV that repeats the same 6 songs all day long. That makes this a really cheap music service for MS-MTV to implement. Minimal download bandwidth and a couple of thumb drives and they're up and running! Can't wait to keep on *not* spending my $s with them.

    --
    "If it's lost, it'll turn up. Things always do" "I love it when a plan comes together"
  54. MTV by Peeptophe · · Score: 1

    Back in the 80s there was this channel that played music videos 24/7. It didn't work. I wonder what ever happened to them?

    --
    * Si hoc legere scis numium eruditionis habes *
    1. Re:MTV by cunninghammer · · Score: 0
      What happenned to the 24/7 music video channel?

      people stopped watching it.

      Advertisers realized that appointment TV has a better reach than short form. The problem with short form is that people tune in then change the channel when the ads come on, where as people watching a long show tend to stay there through the ads. It is much easier to guarantee a certain number of eyeballs at 10pm each Wed when they know the Real World kids might take their clothes off then when they might get a random Ludacris video.

      see also: CNN Headline News Channel

  55. Two great tastes by MECC · · Score: 1

    MS and MTV. Two great tastes that taste great together. One sticks to the roof of your mouth and the other makes you break out.

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
  56. There goes the neighborhood by thunderpaws · · Score: 1

    Brings to mind an old computing acronym: GIGO

  57. And now we know. by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    There's been speculation about why Microsoft's anti-spyware tool only tries to "correct" or "fix" Sony/BMGs rootkit instead of flat-out removing it, and now I think we know why: they intend to do something similar.

  58. Sad by denjin · · Score: 1

    Pretty sad that the theft poster got a higher rating than you did. At least the artists get something at other sites, they don't get a penny from allofmp3.

    1. Re:Sad by HTL2001 · · Score: 1

      "ROMS manages intellectual rights in the Russian Federation. All third party distributors licensed by ROMS are required to pay a portion of the revenue to the ROMS. ROMS in turn, is obligated to pay most of that money (aside from small portion it needs for operating expenses) to artists. Both Russian and foreign."

      From
      http://www.museekster.com/allofmp3faq.htm

      --
      By reading this, you have given me brief control of your mind.
  59. Percussion consists of ringing cash registers & by crovira · · Score: 1

    the scratching of #2 pencils on accounting entry forms.

    This is going to end the same way as Microsoft begins an project.

    Microsoft is buying MTV as a loss-leader in the hopes of accomplishing something usable by the third version.

    If it turns out they were wrong, they spin it off into oblivion. (Heard from 'Slate' lately? :-)

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  60. There's no new music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares, it will carry the same old plagiarized,
    derivative pap from a bunch of talentless wankers who take really good original music by brilliant bands and pass it off as their own.

  61. Yay! Top 40! by WolfZombie · · Score: 1

    I've been waiting for a subscription music service where I can download only the overplayed top 40 music!

  62. Evil teams up with Evil by stavromueller · · Score: 0

    The only price I would pay Microsoft or MTV is free. Two evil giants that I hate vehomently.

    --
    I kill harmless processes for sport
  63. MTV finally back into music by dietsip · · Score: 1

    It's nice to see MTV back in the music business.

  64. What is so bad about it? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Oh boy where shall I start. How about MS being a company intrested ONLY in making sure its software/hardware will be in use for anything and everything. Openess or choice are not in its vocabulary. When MS talks about the freedom to choose they mean you can choose XP Home or XP Proffesional.

    WMA is usually reviewed as bad but hey it is the format MS choose and they will damn well push it down peoples throat no matter what.

    As for MTV. A music provider? Since when? Reality tv show is more like it. A 24 hour advertisement channel going to sell an MS service. If you can't see the sign of the anti-christ in this you must have had your eyes removed.

    I swear when I saw the headline a chill went down my spine. This will result in a shallow service that only offers the most commercial music but will be able to brainwash people with a 24/7 advertisement channel.

    Sony is evil but sony is also still the company that defended the VCR. That today Sony BGM has such an unhealthy control over the hardware side is bad but MS is no different.

    They are the two evil empires of the cold war but to a certain extent they also keep each other in check. Neither can go too far for fear that consumers will just flock to the other.

    I frankly don't want to see MS starting to deal music, this could very well lead to MS like Sony deciding that that business segment gets to control the other segments. At the moment MS still realizes that to a certain extent they have little to gain by a total DRM system. Just like Philips has no business interest (since they sold their music division) in protecting content to the extent the music biz wants. So Philips can sell DVD rippers because they don't give a damn what you do with it just as long as you do it with theirs.

    MS selling music would only increase their desire to make a DRM pc. Not good.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:What is so bad about it? by Tenk101 · · Score: 1

      As cellphone/pda/music-player/tv markets converge MS are obviously going to try get a big chunk of it. If the market is competetive MS is forced to have some level of support for open standards. If the market isn't competetive then one player can dominate with closed standards (like Apple is doing at the moment). What would suck more than anything for the consumer is not having a choice of music and video to listen too/watch, in the end the file format, DRM system and device don't really mean much in the overall picture. Whatever your views on MTV, its not like MS just bought Warner or something like that, if that happened it would seriously challenge what matters in all this which is the art.

  65. I hope that makes you sleep better at night by DeadMilkman · · Score: 1

    After all

    You are:
    Funding the Russian mafia (if you honestly don't believe this you are absolutely mindboggling niave)
    Who in turn extorts and kills people.

    Just because you like your freedom.

    Just friggin download from BT, P2P or somewhere else and stop supporting the Russian mafia.

    1. Re:I hope that makes you sleep better at night by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Funding the Russian mafia

      The original poster in this thread said that if they provided the right service, he'd happily swallow his principles and do business with Microsoft (habitual monopoly abuser) or Sony (clandestine malware distributor). What's so bad about the Russian Mafia?

      I might add that whether or not it's backed by the Russian Mafia, allofmp3.com is in fact a legitimate business, properly licenced by the appropriate Russian authorities. Shouldn't we be encouraging these guys to go legal? What happens when a Mafia discovers that its most profitable businesses are the legitimate ones?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:I hope that makes you sleep better at night by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      he'd happily swallow his principles and do business with Microsoft (habitual monopoly abuser) or Sony (clandestine malware distributor). What's so bad about the Russian Mafia?

      Correction: that was Microsoft or MTV. Both organisations the original poster loathed but would do business with if the price and product were both right. Point stands: if you're swallowing your principles already, who cares if you're dealing with MS or the Mafia?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    3. Re:I hope that makes you sleep better at night by Shihar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Point stands: if you're swallowing your principles already, who cares if you're dealing with MS or the Mafia?

      Wowa there! I think it is time to reset our moral compass.

      I don't like my best friend's girl friend because she is a dumb ditz. I also don't like Hitler because he conducted mass genocide and plunged the world into war. Hitler deserved to die. My friend's girlfriend, as irritating as her mindless prattle can be, doesn't deserve to die. See, we can have varied levels of dislike.

      My dislike of MTV and Microsoft is pretty mild compared to say the Russian mafia, because you, you know, the Russian mafia kills and enslaves people. Microsoft on the other hand makes shitty software while MTV peddles mindless crap to the lowest common denominator.

      My principles against MTV and Microsoft is that I don't like their products. My principles against the Russian Mafia is that they kill people. If you can't see how perhaps those two things are not equal...

    4. Re:I hope that makes you sleep better at night by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      My principles against MTV and Microsoft is that I don't like their products. My principles against the Russian Mafia is that they kill people.

      Well, let's assume that, yes, allofmp3 is owned (presumably via front organisations) by the Russian mafia.

      Ethical problem: the Russian mafia is a criminal organisation, which kills people. Is it, therefore, wrong to buy music from allofmp3.com?

      Well, we should ask:

      - does the Russian mafia kill or threaten to kill people for reasons connected with allofmp3.com? Perhaps they issued death threats to record company executives to obtain their incredibly good deal?

      I doubt that they did. It's not something you do if you can avoid it, not if you want to look like a legitimate operation. I'd bet that they got their surprisingly good deal by bribery. Once that's done, you needn't worry about having to kill people to prevent competition, either: you've already bribed the licensing organisation, so they won't license anyone else!

      - given that the Russian mafia kills people, do revenues from allofmp3.com help them do so more effectively?

      Perhaps. But it's a strange way to behave. Let's suppose they're killing someone for reasons connected with, say, a drug deal. Suppose that they fund the hit with revenues from allofmp3.com. That's weird for two reasons.

      1: you're using your mp3 business to subsidise drug dealing. What? Drug dealing not profitable enough for you?
      2: Since allofmp3.com is acting as a legitimate business, it has financial records, from which missing cash might get noticed. Far better to use drug money for drug-related murder - that stuff's harder to trace.

      I really can't see any particular reason to think that buying stuff from allofmp3 is likely to get anyone killed. If anything, the more profitable allofmp3 becomes, the less likely any mafia behind it is to kill anybody. Once the Mob goes legitimate, there's suddenly a lot less reason to go about murdering.

      Vote with your dollars! Make the Mafia's mp3 business so profitable that the drugs and vice rackets aren't worth the hassle! Help the Russian mafia become a legitimate entrepreneurial middle-class - God knows that country needs one, AFAIK as it is there are a few oligarchs owning damn near everything, a massive population of poor workers, and in between not very much.

      Furthermore, to the best of my knowledge there is no actual evidence that allofmp3 is run by the Russian Mafia. It just seems to be a widespread assumption based on a stereotype. They're a Russian business -> they're run by the Russian Mafia.

      Viewing things from a more abstracted perspective: I could buy from the Russian Mafia. They may then use the money to kill people. Ethical problem? Perhaps. I could instead buy from Microsoft. They may then pay the money in taxes to the United States Government, which may then use the money to kill people. Ethical problem? What's the difference between the money I send to allofmp3 being used to kill Russians, and the money I send to US_RECORD_CO being used to kill Iraqis? Remember that both allofmp3.com and Microsoft are legitimate businesses. It's just that in either case if you follow the money far enough, someone's getting buried.

      And finally, from a Lawful Evil point of view: the Russian Mafia's crimes kill a small number of people I don't know. Microsoft's crimes inconvenience an enormous number of people, myself among them...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    5. Re:I hope that makes you sleep better at night by Jussi+K.+Kojootti · · Score: 1
      Some evidence please. My own experience (and web research before I became their customer) does not support your opinion. I would stop using their services if I thought they were criminals, but I won't do it just because mr. DeadMilkman says I'm naive.

      So put up the evidence or shut up.

  66. Logo Similarities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact that their logo resembles Apple's Quicktime was a bit of a surprise.

    apple.com/quicktime
    urge.com

  67. Brand vs. Value by bmh129 · · Score: 1
    Subscription + download = not-as-good-as-pay-once-and-listen-forever

    It'll never beat the value of iTunes, even if they do have name recognition. I predict another MSNBC, which is a third place runner in a three man race.

    On a side note, didn't RealNetworks recently announce a settlement and a partnership with Microsoft aimed at taking on iTunes?

    Gee, how's that workin' out for you there, Real?

  68. The Worst in Software and the Worst in Music... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    combine forces to give us:

    The URGE to purge!

    Oh,yeah. This is a iPod killer for sure.

  69. Apple does not have a monopoly by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Oh sure Apple is just as evil as MS if not more so. At least MS has some people working for it who seem to think that DRM is not actually a good move for a software company. But apple fortunally is tiny so that is alright.

    But you got yourselve an iPod. Good for you but this hardly then locks you into Apple. You can A: sell it and get another player or B: not use iTunes. There is still the shocking capability that only the most leet people know about getting your content on a revolutionary new media called the CD and throught the magic of an CD-ripper convert and place it on your iPod.

    Saying Apple has a monopoly on either music or mp3 players is like saying Ferrari has a monopoly on fast cars. Sure sure, if you think fast cars you think Ferrari but it is hardly like you got no choice. And if you were lucky to be given one as a present (anyone want to give me one?) you would hardly be locked into the Ferrari Gassoline Monopoly.

    I can't stand people who use the term lock-in were there is none. You got a choice, your just to lazy or ill informed to see it. And as for looking to MS to free you from a perceived lock-in... [CENSOR] [CENSOR] [CENSOR] [CENSORRED] [CENSOR] [CENSOR] and [CENSOR][CENSOR] [CENSOR] with a [CENSOR] on [CENSOR] you [CENSOR].

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Apple does not have a monopoly by Shihar · · Score: 1

      First, this is Slashdot, it is okay to say the word fuck. What this. Fuck fuck fuck fuck, shit fuck shit fuck, cock. See? You don't need to censor yourself. Sure, you be modded down, but well, fuck the mods. Getting the most karma doesn't make you win.

      Second, my point was about an already bought in market and what it takes to break into that market. If you are arguing that Microsoft/MTV can break into the current market without breaking into the iPod, you are fooling yourself. Yes, people can sell off their iPods on e-bay, but that comes at an immediate loss of value. If John Doe bought an iPod for 300 dollars last year, it is worth maybe 50 dollars today. He can't simply swap his old iPod for the next best thing. The fact of the matter is that Apple owns the current market through iPods. Even if people were to stop buying iPods tomorrow, they will still own the market for at least a year or two simply because people don't drop their MP3 players on eBay over night. Apple has this market "locked in". It isn't going anywhere for some time to come. If you don't like the word "locked in", then let me rephrase it as "locked out". The rest of the market that is fighting over the table scraps of non-iPod mp3 players are locked out of the iPod, and most the market owns an iPod that they are not going to part with until time devalues them more.

      Third, as for me personally, I do want alternative pricing options. Let me clarify a little more. I want alternative pricing options beyond buying CDs or buying from iTunes. It isn't the DRM that I give a shit about. It isn't even the price. It is the entire model. I don't want to buy each and every drop of music. In the same way I don't own a single DvD but do subscribe to netflixs, I want to not own any music, but subscribe to a service that will let me dig into their database of music for as long as I am a member. Namely, I want a Napster style all you can eat monthly fee. This is something that neither record stores nor iTunes offers.

      This is an example of an alternative pricing method. If Microsoft/MTV could offer such alternative pricing methods inside of the iPod market, they could potentially break off a piece of iTunes business. I imagine I am not alone in being revolted at paying a hundred dollars if I want to download a 100 random songs, load them up on my mp3 player, then get rid of them after I am done.

  70. Hilarious: urge.com uses Netscape icon. by cuebei · · Score: 1

    The funny thing about this release, is that urge.com, the site that is registered to MTV Networks for this MTV/Microsoft music thing, uses the Netscape icon. Check it out for yourself. http://www.urge.com/ http://www.urge.com/favicon.ico Somebody at MTV has a bit of an anti-microsoft mentality!

  71. MTV is not a label by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 1

    MTV is not a record label, they don't have any music artists signed to them. They'll have to secure a licensing agreement for each and every song to get music to this service. That means not only does MTV/M$ get a cut, the labels get a cut. And from their history of whining about iTunes, they'll demand a hefty cut. It's no surprise that the prices haven't been announced yet, I doubt they'll be able to compete with iTunes with so many hands in the pie.

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
    1. Re:MTV is not a label by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      MTV is not a record label, they don't have any music artists signed to them. They'll have to secure a licensing agreement for each and every song to get music to this service. That means not only does MTV/M$ get a cut, the labels get a cut. And from their history of whining about iTunes, they'll demand a hefty cut. It's no surprise that the prices haven't been announced yet, I doubt they'll be able to compete with iTunes with so many hands in the pie.

      That depends a lot upon MS. MS may, for example, take only a token cut, while at the same time absorbing all the distribution costs like bandwidth, servers, employees, etc. Why would MS do that? They might do that because they can just roll the costs into the price of Windows (monopoly power) and because it will make them more money in the future. They want to kill the iTunes store and kill the .mp4 format. Both lend money and power to an organization that threatens their core monopoly. Also, with their own, proprietary, format and DRM established as the only/priomary format they can easily make it hard for users to migrate away and can take a licensing cut (of pretty much whatever amount they want) from each music sale from any company. CDs will include windows media files as well so they get a cut of the hard copy sales. And the record industry is trapped paying because they can't afford to try to get customers to move to something else that for some reason won't work on Windows and will require customers to re-purchase all their old music.

      MS+MTV won't be profitable compared to iTunes, but that does not mean they can't undersell them.

  72. What about VH1? by theurge14 · · Score: 1

    Where else am I going to download my Top 100 lists, like Top 100 Songs Featuring Bands With Big Hair?

  73. Urinal by behindthewall · · Score: 1

    The name makes me think of finding a Urinal.

    Or maybe that's the coffee I've just drunk. Whatever.

  74. who comes up with this stuff? by metamongrel · · Score: 1

    do they consider this a good strategy? mtv hasn't been about music--let alone been cool--since the 80s. looks like two more elephants lumbering off to the elephant graveyard together.

  75. Predictions by jasenj1 · · Score: 1

    MTV + Microsoft?
    Woohoo, Real World podcasts in DRMed WMA. Music? Maybe songs from whatever boy band, bubblehead blonde, and gansta rapper the music labels are pushing this week. Forget about any depth in the music catalog. Expect singles to cost more than on iTunes, be available for a month or two, drop to $0.89 for a week and then disappear from the catalog.

    And you know MS will choose a format that locks out the iPod and claim "choice" in an effort to sell players that license MS technology. Nevermind the vast marketshare iPods have; rather than court iPod owners, they'll try to push their own proprietary format. (But it's not really proprietary because more than one DAP manufacturer uses it. See? It's open. It's choice. Choice is good.)

    And expect either a Windows only software client, or a web app that only works with Windows IE. Even a Flash based front end would be better than whatever they dream up.

    Rag on Apple all you want, but they developed an easy to use end-to-end product (iTunes + iPod) that did one thing well (no FM tuner, no voice recording, just play music). They started small - Mac only, got things tuned up nicely, and went on to dominate. Now that they've established their brand, they are slowly adding features - podcasts, photos, now video.

    I think MS+MTV could give Apple a run if they:
    a) Offer songs in better quality than Apple. Use 300kbps as the default quality. Offer lower quality versions for cheaper, and near or better than CD quality for a bit more.
    b) Really work the music video angle. Apple may have a headstart here, but MTV may just have the branding power to take the lead as THE music video source. They should have the back catalog, but rights may be a big sticking point.
    c) Capitalize on the 80s nostalgia. The 80s saw the birth of the music video. Put all the cheesy early videos on there you can. Let users rate and comment on them. Build a community around mocking/loving that old stuff.
    d) And as much as I hate the current MTV, they should leverage the MTV programming. Yes, podcasts from all their current shows should be there. *shudder*

    - Jasen.

  76. Microsoft missed the beat again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft missed the beat again. It took them a couple of years to becaome a follower once more.
    Microsoft too young to die too old to rock and roll.

  77. Urge? by circusboy · · Score: 1

    Overkill?

    --
    -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
  78. My mistake then by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Yeah the current pricing system is expensive especially if your looking to fill a 30gb iPod BUT I always thought the price was set by the music business. Apple I had understood is very willing to go lower. The music industry wants to go higher. So it is not really apples fault.

    The entire industry is incredibly immature but then just try to buy a new car from a non-brand dealer. You know like a car supermarket where the fords and fiats are next to each other? We the consumer are always screwed. Get used to it.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  79. Don't forget VH-1 by Shakes268 · · Score: 0

    It has completely gone down hill as well. Personally, music videos have gotten so stupid that I don't even care to watch them. I'd rather just switch over to the XM stations on my satellite tv for music.

  80. where'd the music go? by brontus3927 · · Score: 1

    Cosponsored by MTV... Does that mean that in a few years, you won't be able to download music, just reality TV shows like Real World?

  81. billy bathgates - I've got an uncontrollable urge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to sodomize a competitor,

    because it feels so good, to exercise my big fat monopoly this way...

    yeah yeah yeah!

  82. Hmphf! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No Mac, no digg!

    (Sorry... wrong website)

  83. MS hates not being the 500 lb. gorilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I don't get why MS just can't accept that they lost this one to Apple and learn how to play nice. Is that too much to ask?

    Apple has sold, what, 38 million iPods so far, and analyst estimates are that the sales will continue to increase their markshare? Apple is also approaching 1 billion songs sold. 1 billion. That's just insane. And this MS/MTV store will not be compatible with those millions of iPods? Uh-huh. That's a plan for success. Isolate your offerings from the majority of the market. Hmm... who does that remind me of? Oh, that's right: Apple circa 1992. Remember back when Apple refused to be compatible with Windows/IBM PCs which was the dominant platform? How far did that get Apple?

    MS is about to learn a similar lesson that when you're not the dominant player, you have to play by the big guy's rules. I don't think MS is accustomed to not being the playground bully, and Apple is really cagey about how they do things, staying about 5-6 steps ahead of everyone and rapidly discarding old ideas that others are trying hard to copy. I don't see MS and MTV making much headway with this move. If Wal-Mart had to throw themselves on their own sword and give in to Apple and the iPod, then MS and MTV don't stand much chance at all.

  84. Who are these people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what are they doing here?

  85. HEY YOU KIDS!!! GET OFF MY LAWN!! by toopc · · Score: 1
    Back when I was a kid, MTv was cool.

    Geez, but you guys sound a lot like somone's parents. If you're over 16, you aren't supposed to like MTv. If you did, they wouldn't be doing their job.

  86. MTV != Music by uniqueUser · · Score: 0

    What does MTV have to do with music these days?

    --
    GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper