Slashdot Mirror


George Takei To Play Star Trek's Sulu Again

Tycoon Guy writes "TrekToday reports that George Takei has agreed to play Hikaru Sulu in an upcoming episode of the fan series Star Trek: New Voyages. He's the second actor from the original Star Trek series to come onboard; another episode will feature Walter Koenig as Pavel Chekov. And here's what really makes this news great: Takei's episode will be written by none other than David Gerrold, the SF writer who also brought us Star Trek's Tribbles."

267 comments

  1. Oh god... by TheNoxx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That looks worse than a spanish telenovella... But I guess the bad acting is just a stab at what the future will actually be like. Points for realism.

    Hey, I could be wrong. Maybe that fan series will be the next Twin Peaks. But I'll not hazard a viewing.

    --
    Ex nihilo nihil fit.
    1. Re:Oh god... by Oldsmobile · · Score: 2, Funny

      So what you are saying is, that the original Star Trek series was actually a show about a really loysy reality TV show from the future. Wow, communicators, red jumpsuits, teleportation, warpdrives.... They really WERE ahead of their times!

      --
      Some say he is made with ascii, others that he is eyeballed daily by millions. All we know is, he is known as the Sig
    2. Re:Oh god... by zetile · · Score: 1

      From wikipedia: [Spanish Telenovela] ... They are more popular worldwide than American, British and Australian soap operas combined. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telenovela) I don't like them either, but the world seems to like them.

    3. Re:Oh god... by NiteShaed · · Score: 0

      The Spice Girls were very popular for a while too.....plenty of cases where popular != good

      (this is not a direct jab at Spanish Telenovelas, never seen one personally)

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    4. Re:Oh god... by TheNoxx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Exactly. Worse yet, it's possible Gene Roddenberry was merely a producer *from* the future, where his overacting contestants on a future reality tv show didn't make enough money, so he traveled back through time with them, using extremely advanced computer graphics to make it look like an ancient American SciFi TV show (you know, powerful Cell24 processors to make bad hair appear atop their heads). This way, they knew they'd at least gather a cult following and live off geek groupies' fandom and bad sex for decades!

      --
      Ex nihilo nihil fit.
    5. Re:Oh god... by StarbuckTheCat · · Score: 1

      I cannot believe that people in a highly advanced future society will have feathered hair. Completely ruins any suspension of disbelief.

    6. Re:Oh god... by the+chao+goes+mu · · Score: 1

      It would explain why Shatner appeared in a movie speaking Esparanto, because we all know in the future everyone will speak Esparanto.

      --
      Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs.
    7. Re:Oh god... by kmount · · Score: 1

      R.I.P. Wesley Willis

    8. Re:Oh god... by TheKnightWhoSaysNi · · Score: 1

      They are more popular worldwide than American, British and Australian soap operas combined. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telenovela) I don't like them either, but the world seems to like them.

      It's all about the babes. I personally watch them with the TV on "mute".

    9. Re:Oh god... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Eh.

      I don't mind the 'New Voyages' series, but I'd hardly classify it as 'fan fiction'. IMNSFBHO, the 'fan fiction' aspect of it is that they're claiming it's fan fiction, and nobody's getting paid for it. Several of the crew as well as the writing staff (they signed up DC Fontana as head writer awhile back, LONG before they picked up David Gerrold) are working professionals, most of them with Star Trek credits.


      Per the website, outside 'help' is EXPRESSLY not solicited, and was actively discouraged.


      For what I consider 'real' fanfic Trek video, hit http://www.hiddenfrontier.com/ for the Star Trek: Hidden Frontier series currently starting production on their 7th season.

    10. Re:Oh god... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2, Funny

      Presumably, things would go this way:

      (Sulu walks onto the bridge.)

      Kirk: Sulu! Oh my god. It's ancient Sulu from the future! Gods, man! Sulu, what happened. WHAT HAPPENED?!?!? (grabbing upper arms and shaking him)

      Sulu: Captain, I bring you a warning. You're gonna die a stupid death. On the positive side, it'll be climbing around on Wile-e-Coyote-style rock formations in California just like you always loved doing, like with the Gorn and that Plato guy and your old girlfriend or whoever the hell that ghosty chick was.

      (Kirk looks as Spock. Spock raises an eyebrow.)

      Sulu: Did you know you have a son? By the way, the Klingon's moon Praxis is going to explode in about 20 years. You might want to subtly encourage them via clandestine CIA manipulation to dump even more antimatter waste and neutronium. Perhaps it can take out their entire starsystem.

      Kirk: You're kidding!

      Sulu: I wish I were! (Suddenly looks woozy.)

      Kirk: (catches him as he starts to fall.) Kirk to sickbay. Medical emergency on the bridge!

      Sulu: Also...

      Kirk: Also, what?

      Sulu: Also...you must, you must destroy the Crusher family line. Just hand out some condoms to the ones currently alive should be sufficient. You need to...you need to....agk!

      Kirk: Need to what? To WHAT? (shakes him gently again)

      (McCoy runs in and waves the medical tricorder saltshaker thingie over him.) His career is dead, Jim.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    11. Re:Oh god... by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      He forgot to warn him about the kidney stone.

    12. Re:Oh god... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmm... Thalia.

    13. Re:Oh god... by mink · · Score: 1

      If all the Science Fiction writes I read growing up thought so it must be true!
      I just cant wait to get a second right arm when my left one is blown off so I can shake hands with myself.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  2. I'm working too hard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just read this as "Google Taxi to Play Star Trek's Sulu Again"

  3. holy underwhelming by deft · · Score: 2, Interesting

    im a fan of the series... but have you seen these things... acting worse than.... well, the original series.

    ack, I'm so torn between cool that they are doing it and having fun, but geez.. no dignity. eh, then again, how cool is it that the actors are even interested... thats cool. but its going to be so bad.

    eh, its cool. crap.

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    1. Re:holy underwhelming by aussie_a · · Score: 4, Insightful

      im a fan of the series... but have you seen these things... acting worse than.... well, the original series.

      Thanks for that commentary Mr. Shatner. But I have to disagree. I'd say the acting is about equal to the original series (which isn't saying much ;)). But as I like TOS (although I wouldn't be stupid enough to pay for it, and only know one person who is stupid enough), and for free entertainment, New Voyages isn't too bad for a lazy night. I could do worse watching Ballroom bloody Dancing.

    2. Re:holy underwhelming by bani · · Score: 1

      Good lord, no. While TOS acting was not great by any means, it's light years better than this fan generated stuff.

      Fans should stay behind the cameras, not in front of them.

      HIre real actors please. Scout your local schools or something, but please end the madness!

    3. Re:holy underwhelming by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 0

      um...

      dignity?

      --
      This space available.
    4. Re:holy underwhelming by jcr · · Score: 1

      but have you seen these things... acting worse than.... well, the original series.

      Sometimes there's a downside to being inclusive. Ever been to a Filk? ;-)

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    5. Re:holy underwhelming by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Well, TV in the sixties was commonly referred to as a critical wasteland. Granted a 60s series have stood the test of time, like The Prisoner and The Twilight Zone, but for the most part TV was commercial pablum: artistically slapdash and creatively timid.

      What made TOS standout was its aspriations. It wasn't an apparatus designd to make money with minimal risk, it was a labor of love. As such things are it was more than occasionally a bit embarassing but there at least was no question that each and every episode had deep significance to someone at least.

      When Roddenberry died, the franchise lost its soul, and became an imitation of itself. It went all calculatd and post-modern, constantly self-aware of itself as a medium. TOS on the other hand was authentic; it was sincere and earnest to the point of painfulness. Case in point: later series used sex appeal, dressing their anatomically improbable female stars in cat suits to appeal to a young male demographic. When Roddenberry dressed Yeoman Rand in a skirt that wouldn't have made a decent dinner napkin, he was making an true sincere and un-selfconsious statement. TOS didn't try to be sexy, it was sexy. It practically raised sexiness to the level of a personal philosophy.

      TOS embodied an authentic personal vision of a future of complete liberation: political, economic, gender role and of sexual. Maybe it's naive; maybe it's unacheivable; but it's worse to have no vision.

      The tragedy of life doesn't lie in not reaching your goal. The tragedy lies in having no goal to reach. It isn't a calamity to die with dreams unfulfilled, but it is a calamity not to dream.... It is not a disgrace not to reach the stars, but it is a disgrace to have no stars to reach for. Not failure, but low aim is sin.

      -Benjamin Elijah Mays


      A man's reach should exceed his grasp, or what's heaven for?

      -Robert Brownin
      g

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    6. Re:holy underwhelming by odourpreventer · · Score: 1

      Well, sometimes they're good both behind and in front of the cameras.

    7. Re:holy underwhelming by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 5, Funny

      When Roddenberry died, the franchise lost its soul, and became an imitation of itself.

      Oh, hell, here I was warming up for a good old fashioned Kirk vs. Picard/ST:TOS vs. ST:TNG flamewar, sharpening the standard set of knives, but my boss just e.mailed me that he needs the project summary reports and '06 projections by 4:00 today, rather than next Thursday, so I just don't have time for it today. Too bad... that argument is always fun.

      Slashdot editors, could you please repost this story on Monday, so we can have this argument next week? Thanks.

      --
      The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    8. Re:holy underwhelming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I hear people say this stuff all the time about Roddenberry. "The franchise lost its soul" and so on. Pure crap. The problem is that everyone remembers the good episodes from TOS in years 1 and 2 and forgets the bad ones from year 3. _Spock's Brain_ anyone? TOS was going downhill badly in season 3 and Roddenberry didn't care. In fact, he is responsible for some of the low points in TOS history, such as the episode where Spock first talks about "infinite diversity in infinite combinations" (IDIC), which was little more than a badly disguised way to sell some IDIC trinkets and pocket some cash. Roddenberry was often all about the money, which is something his fans overlook.

      To be blunt, the first year of _The Next Generation_ is terrible. Have any of you seen those episodes recently? They are often appallingly bad. Folks, the truth is that TNG didn't get better until Roddenberry started having less and less to do with it and it hit its peak after he died. For those of you who really liked _Deep Space Nine_, the series would have been absolutely impossible in that form had Roddenberry lived, since he would have strenuously objected to the religious aspects of the show. He was very proud of being an atheist and although it's kind of subtle in TOS and just below the surface in TNG, he viewed the future as a place where religion had no place. Given the general hostility in Slashdot to religion, no doubt that plays some role in why "Saint Roddenberry" :-) is so revered by some here.

    9. Re:holy underwhelming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is Slashdot - of course it'll be duped sometime next week!

    10. Re:holy underwhelming by donweel · · Score: 1

      Indeed,TOS was ahead of it's time. Some great stories, (Assignment Earth was my favourite). And some of the best character interaction of any series. However when I watch these shows now, what still hits me the most is the endless supply of the most beautiful women I have ever seen. It seems they had godesses just cueing up to be in the show.

      --
      Many a long talk since then I have had with the man in the moon; he had my confidence on the voyage. Joshua Slocum
    11. Re:holy underwhelming by dptalia · · Score: 1
      could do worse watching Ballroom bloody Dancing.

      Hey! I like ballroom dancing!!! At least, watching it. You don't ever want to see me dance.

      --
      Genius is one percent inspiration and 99 percent perspiration, which is why engineers sometimes smell really bad.
    12. Re:holy underwhelming by operagost · · Score: 1
      TOS embodied an authentic personal vision of a future of complete liberation: political, economic, gender role and of sexual.
      That explains Kirk's fondness for blue alien chicks. But I'm still searching for the lost "cross-dressing" episode.
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    13. Re:holy underwhelming by UnixRevolution · · Score: 1

      I could do worse watching Ballroom bloody Dancing

      On the contrary, BLOODY ballroom dancing would be quite entertaining.

      --
      You like your new Mac more than you like me, don't you, Dave? Dave? I asked...She said Yes.
    14. Re:holy underwhelming by smorpheus · · Score: 1
      It's clear in Roddenberry's universe that Christianity, Judaism, and Islam didn't survive into the 24th Century, but is that really a surprise? How could the 100% peaceful world that Roddenberry imagined really exist while these religions were still present to the extent they are in contemporary times?

      For that matter, it's clear that in vision for TNG, he believes Capitlism can't exist in his universe either (with the exception of dastardly villains with greed as a primary motive.) The vision of Star Trek is clearly a optimistic lefitst one. Again, I don't really see a problem with that, as it always pushed progressive ideas from its inception. What exactly were you looking for contemporary conservative ideals still being perserved 400 years from now?

      Clearly the religion of Star Trek is the religion of science. I don't really see how this could be considered to have "held back" the series.

      While there are some examples of Bad Trek during Roddenberry's life, most of the Bad Trek happened after he died. I'm not sure how that could lead someone to believe that Roddenberry "held the series back" when he stopped holding it back, Paramount managed to bury a strong and thirving franchise right into the ground (to the point where Activision sued them for ruining the IP!).

    15. Re:holy underwhelming by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      [ insert sly reference to the Ballroom Blitz song here ]
      http://ntl.matrix.com.br/pfilho/html/lyrics/b/ball room_blitz.txt

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    16. Re:holy underwhelming by Christopher+B.+Brown · · Score: 1
      Clearly the religion of Star Trek is the religion of science. I don't really see how this could be considered to have "held back" the series.

      Its religion wasn't exactly "science"; that is about the physics and chemistry and biology of things. It might be better to say there was a "Zen of Star Trek," a perspective on the universe that was uniquely Roddenberrian...

      A vital part of it was the notion that the evolution of humanity would become some form of "godhood" in the universe. Anyone that has a problem with "Intelligent design" being considered "scientific" should have the same problem with this...

      In any case, I'm not sure the issue is so much that Roddenberry's anti-religious attitudes held anything back as it is that it is pretty clear that the whole quasi-respectful treatment of Bajoran religion wouldn't have take place on his watch.

      It is quite reasonable for a military commander who doesn't have any background in an alien religion to be a tad skeptical about them viewing him as a vitally important (to their religion) "Emissary." But in TOS, and, to a lesser degree, TNG, religious institutions weren't simply a matter for "a tad of skepticism;" they were either:

      • A front for a powerful alien presence cementing their physical power with religious trappings, or
      • Something made up by superstitious primitives that worshipped some phenomenon whose science they could not or would not understand, or
      • A front constructed to fortify a political movement,
      none of these being honestly deserving of "worship," or, for that matter, much more than pitying derision.

      Was the change in DS9 bad? I dunno; I just know it wasn't consistent with the way Roddenberry had worked before...

      --
      If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
    17. Re:holy underwhelming by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      I agree with your point about the acting. Part of which I think comes from them attempting to mimic the acting styles of the old series (Kirk, Spock, McCoy etc.).
      Thanks to the wonders of technology, the special effects are in general significantly better than the original series.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    18. Re:holy underwhelming by CoderJoe · · Score: 3, Funny

      he needs the project summary reports

      Don't you hate TPS reports?

    19. Re:holy underwhelming by SleepyHappyDoc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      TOS was going downhill badly in season 3 and Roddenberry didn't care.

      Um, Roddenberry was almost uninvolved with season 3 of TOS. In protest of NBC putting the show in the timeslot-of-death, he turned over most of the reigns to Fred Freiburger.

      --
      Stasis is death. Embrace change.
  4. Oh my! by ellem · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He was AWESOME last week on Stern as the announcer - I wish him well. 68 years old, just came out of the closet and then goes on The Howard Stern Show after a decade of ribbing... George Takei is Okay. RIP Rein LaBlanche.

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
    1. Re:Oh my! by sgant · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, I was pretty impressed also with George. He can certainly take a joke and that laugh of his is totally infectious.

      He was also very forthright and VERY open about his personal life. Something you just don't see in other actors much. You could tell that Stern was trying to rattle him with all kinds of questions, but George didn't falter at all. Good for him.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    2. Re:Oh my! by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

      Here here! Nothing but respect for him. A truely great guy!

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    3. Re:Oh my! by pipingguy · · Score: 0, Flamebait


      "Came out of the closet" on Stern's show can mean a lot of things (if he's gay, that's fine). Stern has to justify the piles of cash he's getting, so I wouldn't put it past him to pay people to "be gay" for his show.

      Takei has always undertoned his natural voice, all actors can do this, that's why many of them do voices for cartoon shows.

    4. Re:Oh my! by fantoma · · Score: 1

      He is gay and he came out of the closet before the Stern show. He's now the announcer on the Stern show and as the first poster said he was great. Tricking him into thinking he was speaking with the real Arnold Schwarzenegger not once, but twice was some of the funniest radio I've heard in a while. They really need to get Takei back in the studio regularly.

    5. Re:Oh my! by pipingguy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I also agree that he's a neat guy and maybe gay and he sounds cool now that Bill is not usurping his lines. Howard Stern is also cool you can tell that he is COOL because he is getting paid HALF A BILLION dollars, can you argue with THAT? Some people are SO clueless. lol

    6. Re:Oh my! by Xiaran · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I ran into him once in JFK while waiting for my missus to fly in from LAX. It was a bit of a angry situation because the entire flights baggage had been loaded on the wrong plane and was in Philly or something. There were lots of angry people and George and the people he was with seemed pretty pissed(Fair enough... I would have been also). So I didnt want to bother him. But two women next to me went up to him went up to him and asked "Arent you Lt Sulu?" His reponse was "Actually in the last film they made me a Captain". And he chatted with them for a bit. He left me with an impression of being a really nice guy... under the circumstances I dont think I would have been so patient with random people asking me stuff.

    7. Re:Oh my! by Cocoronixx · · Score: 0

      someones got some envy issues. hater!

      roflstiltskins

      --
      "Obscenity is the crutch of the inarticulate motherfucker." - cloak42
    8. Re:Oh my! by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

      He was also very forthright and VERY open about his personal life. Something you just don't see in other actors much.

      I think you see it a bit too much, actually. "Cult of Celebrity," and all that. An odd societal quirk, to be sure, but clearly a big financial benefit to The Church of Scientology, so how bad can it be, right?

      Right?

    9. Re:Oh my! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... You therefore beleive Bill Gates is cool too! Wow. :)

    10. Re:Oh my! by DogDude · · Score: 5, Funny

      He was also very forthright and VERY open about his personal life.

      You mean like when he said that he swallows on the Howard Stern show? Yeah, I'd call that forthright.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    11. Re:Oh my! by sgant · · Score: 2, Informative

      hehe, exactly. That's what I mean. Howard asked all these really dirty, personal questions and George didn't even flinch and answered everything Howard dished out. Now, maybe he was a little TOO open and forthright really, but he was a good sport about it all.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    12. Re:Oh my! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Robot Robot Robot, you don't even-- you're glib.

    13. Re:Oh my! by franl · · Score: 1

      Hoo hoo, Robin. I invented Warp Drive.

    14. Re:Oh my! by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He can certainly take a joke and that laugh of his is totally infectious.

      His voice is very distinctive. While waiting for a friend in the lobby of a Beverly Hills movie theatre I heard this voice that made me turn towards the speaker. It was Mr. Takei whose voice stood out from probably 50 feet.

    15. Re:Oh my! by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 0, Troll

      Oh come on, if you go on Howard Stern and you don't expect to answer those kind of questions, well, you've never listened to Howard Stern before :P 50% of his guests are strippers who he has on the show pretty much just to watch them have sex in his studio. He's a dirty old man, though that's a large part of his appeal.

    16. Re:Oh my! by Belgand · · Score: 1

      "But you never talk about yourself"
      "Well, maybe if you showed a little interest."

    17. Re:Oh my! by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, it's too bad he wasn't so forthright in his autobiography -- knowing that he's gay changes the context of his recollections considerably.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    18. Re:Oh my! by maelstrom · · Score: 1

      Monster rain?

      --
      The more you know, the less you understand.
    19. Re:Oh my! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously know nothing about HS

    20. Re:Oh my! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      No shit. It's at least 75% who are strippers (or who will strip for him for money and prizes, or who are starlettes with pages on Mr. Skin dot com.)

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    21. Re:Oh my! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      > "Actually in the last film they made me a Captain".

      In full context, evidently Sulu was pissed that his few moderate scenes in the whale movie were cut. Hence later on, he's captain of the Excelsior, and Kirk and the lads watch him fly away at the end of the next movie, saying "That's a big ship!" "Not half as big as 'er captain."

      He got his due! Sulu got his due!

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    22. Re:Oh my! by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

      Hee.

      "Now, why would you assume that I knew kara-te?"

    23. Re:Oh my! by arodland · · Score: 1

      Of course this is a good thing because if they hadn't made him Captain, they wouldn't have been able to canonicalize the character of Demora Sulu from Peter David's "The Captain's Daughter" ;)

    24. Re:Oh my! by DogDude · · Score: 1

      That IS his appeal! He's not a particularly good DJ. He never really says anything insightful. Sometimes it's just terrible. Sometimes, I don't even know what in the hell is going on. I don't know why I listen, exactly... it's just this totally bizarre thing that keeps me wondering what he could possibly say next. Apparently, I'm not the only one... He's been on the air for 25 years, and has the biggest radio show in radio history.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    25. Re:Oh my! by vdo2000 · · Score: 1

      "That's a big ship!" "Not half as big as 'er captain."

      Considering Shatner's girth, wouldn't this have made more sense if it had been said about Captain Kirk?

    26. Re:Oh my! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      George is also one of the nicest, sincere and enthusiastic guys I've ever met out of any actor. I went to a convention where he was going jogging one morning before his appearance that day and casually (as if he was talking to a roomful of friends) invited anyone who wanted to go along, to join him. During the convention, the promoters were very intent on numerously announcing to us; 1 picture only, dont go behind the desk he's signing at, dont stop and chat, ie: dont do anything to slow things down. George changed that by taking charge of the situation with each attendee that came to get an autograph "Oh, you want to take a picture? Sure! Come on back here so you can be in the shot! Sir, (to the next person online) would you mind taking a picture for us?", and stopping to chat with each person, asking where you were from, what you did for a living, discussing his experiences when he last visited your home town, or just joking around, all with that infectious laugh and genuine smile of his. The line took forever, but no one cared... probably because he sorta made it feel more like he was here to see all of us instead of us coming there to see him. And it was humourous to watch the promoters looking on realizing they had lost total control - not to fans being insistent about getting an extra autograph or stopping to chat - but to George who was just as insistent that we not just had that chance, but took it - even if it took his prompting of some of the shyer ones of us.

      It's great to see him and Walter once again giving back to us, as well as his own claim that all of us (fans and artists) can guide Star Trek forward and make it what we want in it's new voyages.

      As for the two episodes that are up, I'm mostly pretty impressed with them. A few critiques, a few things I wasnt too happy with. But on the whole, for a buncha people who cant make any money off of the episodes, and have already spent millions in time or actual money (the bridge set alone was over $100,000), I think their efforts are amazing - and to see so many TOS actors and actresses (both guest stars and regulars), as well as some of Trek's best writers jumping onboard shows I'm not the only one.

      -RobM

    27. Re:Oh my! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      bones: my god, thats a big ship.
      scotty: not so big as her captain, i think.


      from the not-so-obvious-dept - quoted from 'star trek vi - the undiscovered country', after the excelsior (commanded by sulu) and enterprise part ways near the end
  5. Re:I get it now by alphasubzero949 · · Score: 1

    But somehow it manages to give us a warm fuzzy feeling like...uh...tribbles.

  6. Who's next? by Flyboy+Connor · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Maybe they can get William Shatner next. The guys from Free Enterprise succeeded in that.

    1. Re:Who's next? by Jess+(geek-chick) · · Score: 1

      Yes, but they had him doing a scene from his six-hour musical version of Julius Caesar. Rapping no less. "No Tears for Caesar" indeed.

      --
      If anyone needs me, I'll be in the Angry Dome.
    2. Re:Who's next? by horati0 · · Score: 1

      Maybe they can get William Shatner next. The guys from Free Enterprise succeeded in that.

      That movie rules. One of those films where you don't have to be a Trekkie to enjoy. Supposedly there's a sequel in the works, but IMDB has it as "announced" for like 2 years.

      --
      The neutrality of this sig is disputed.
  7. You're not working too hard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are reading /.

  8. Re:I get it now by Ardeocalidus · · Score: 1

    I sense some tribble trouble.

  9. Takei on Stern's Show by putko · · Score: 2, Informative

    George Takei is amazing. Now he's on Stern, where he came out of the closet.

    Stern asked him what positions he likes, and Takei went into it. Here's some proof: http://www.theage.com.au/news/world/stern-age-begi ns/2006/01/13/1137118970418.html

    Really funny. Takei sounds like a very earnest guy though -- it is great he gets to work on this stuff.

    --
    http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
    1. Re:Takei on Stern's Show by Ardeocalidus · · Score: 2, Informative

      He's great. He also described his (now former according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Takei#Star_Tre k) loathing for Shatner on Stern. On Jan. 9th, Stern announced that Takei would be the official announcer for his show. Even more of a reason to get Sirius.

    2. Re:Takei on Stern's Show by putko · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh Man! That is amazing. He actually publicly accused Shatner. That's great.

      I think Takei was the best on Stern when they have the Schwarzenegger impersonator, and Takei was trying to get him to agree to sign the gay marriage bill. It was so amazing to see how cool he stayed, how nice he was, even as the Arnold impersonator insulted and degraded him so much -- because he really wanted the governor to sign that bill.

      Takei seems like a very, very nice and decent guy. I simply couldn't believe the mocking and abuse he put up with -- esp. the cracks about the internment camps that the impersonator made.

      Stern's show is amazing!

      --
      http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
    3. Re:Takei on Stern's Show by Ardeocalidus · · Score: 1
      Interestingly enough, my uncle has an asian partner (no gay uncle jokes) over in L.A. Pretty sure its not Takei though. :-P

      The great thing about Takei is he's cool with his orientation. I know plenty of gay people who either A) are shy, B) think every straight person is out to get them, or C) outrageously gay.

      Takei, he's none of them. He's a down-to-earth guy and that's why people respect him. He's just a cool guy and I think that's why he wants to do New Voyages. Its re-interacting with the community that has loved him for years. For an actor to go back and reprise a role after so many years is awesome.

      Besides, NY will get some real acting talent...

    4. Re:Takei on Stern's Show by wfberg · · Score: 1

      The great thing about Takei is he's cool with his orientation. I know plenty of gay people who either A) are shy, B) think every straight person is out to get them, or C) outrageously gay.

      The B) category of gays is probably outnumbered quite a bit by heterosexual males worried that all gays are out to get them (from behind!).. ;-)

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    5. Re:Takei on Stern's Show by Ardeocalidus · · Score: 0
      But remember Ron White's argument:

      "Now, I asked my friend 'Do you like to watch porno' and he said 'Hell yea, I do'. I said 'Do you only watch lesbian porn?', he said 'No, I like to see a man and a woman making love'. Well, I said 'And do you want that guy to have a small, flaccid penis' and he said 'Hell no! He needs to have a large, throbbing co-... Well, I never knew that about myself...'"

      In the Kinsey reports, its written that most males are afraid of homosexuals because they have deep-rooted homosexual tendencies themselves. This is surpressed by their psyche, developed during their childhood which, in the case of the Country, is typically conservative Christian.

      George Takei is a role model. He's straight, but gay!

    6. Re:Takei on Stern's Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whew! So it's ok if I'm not a grown man. I was getting worried...

    7. Re:Takei on Stern's Show by PFI_Optix · · Score: 0

      Takei is a great example of what a naturally gay man is like. He's an ordinary man who digs other men. He doesn't feel the need to act like a woman or boast about his homosexuality...it's simply normal to him. I think the argument that men are "afraid" of homosexuals due to their own homosexual tendencies is absurd. That's a typical childhood playground argument: you don't like something because deep down you're in denial about being that way yourself. Most men I know aren't afraid of homosexuals, they're disgusted by them. They find the idea of being with men revolting. A couple of gay friends and I got to talking about that once. They said they feel the same way about being with a woman--they simply can't imagine it.

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    8. Re:Takei on Stern's Show by JThundley · · Score: 1

      He didn't come out of the closet on the Howard Stern Show, he announced it in an interview for Frontiers magazine. Oh myyyyyyyyyy.

    9. Re:Takei on Stern's Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The jokes about Takei on the Stern show for years have centered on his over-enunciated and extra deep-voiced manner of speech, and edited sound clips that implied that he is gay, which he had not at the time publicly admitted.

      I would have expected from the way he sounded that he would take himself very seriously, and take offense at being mocked.

      So, when he showed himself as the Stern show announcer to be completely open, humble, and laughing at everything, well, the contrast with my expectations made him very, very funny and charming.

    10. Re:Takei on Stern's Show by mink · · Score: 1

      So what is it when you are not revolted by the idea of being with men but prefer heterosexual relationships or vice versa (in terms of genders)?
      Most of the time things are painted the way you and other posters present, but I think there is more then those twists out there. Frankly I'm boggled anyone can be revolted by much of anything simple like gender. Now scat/torture or other extreme stuff will produce an extreme reaction in people and I understand that. I am always wishing I could burn out the part of my mind where tubgirl is stored, I'm not really bothered by goatse, or the female equivalent (they exist).

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  10. Good for the Fanbase by Ardeocalidus · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I think its great that some of the original cast members are willing to act in a internet fan-based series.

    A) It keeps the community alive and series continuity going

    B) Its just a good feeling that the older actors are willing to go back after all this time. Its a warm, fuzzy feeling.

    1. Re:Good for the Fanbase by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      I suppose... just reminds me of Galaxy Quest a bit too much.

      Hey, that's really good. Usually it's just some cardboard cutouts in a garage. Ok, red particle cannons! ...and throw that at em while you're at it.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    2. Re:Good for the Fanbase by sunwukong · · Score: 1

      That's right, Bob: we'll go to Warp 10 to save you money! ...

      Everything 25% .... except for nukuleer wessels!

      Mel Farr Superstar, your time of ad supremecy is over!

  11. John Lim was pissed! by shirai · · Score: 3, Interesting

    John Lim (Hikaru Sulu in New Voyages) playing the character formally played by actor George Takei, was reportedly pissed. "It's obviously an anti-Chinese thing," he noted. Takei maintained that Sulu was indeed Japanese and not Chinese and that Mr. Lim was just miscast from the beginning.

    Lim suggested he was still open to reprise his role as Sulu in an upcoming New Voyages episode in which a future Sulu (Played by Takei) would meet his younger self in a time warp created by a worm hole.

    http://www.startreknewvoyages.com/images/cast/lim. jpg

    --
    Sunny

    Be my Friend

    1. Re:John Lim was pissed! by Leffe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd be pissed too -- if it could generate me some media attention!

    2. Re:John Lim was pissed! by TerranFury · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That sounds vaguely reminicent of all the complaints about Chinese actresses being cast in Memoirs of a Geisha. I've seen movies made from books, in which black actors played white characters -- well. So who cares if somebody Chinese plays a character who is incidentally Japanese? It's acting. The whole point is to behave like somebody you're not.

      So if this really is about ethnicity, I sympathize with Mr. Lim. But if he's just playing that card because he's annoyed he didn't get the role, then he's playing the sorts of politics I can't stand.

      Not being intimately familiar with what's going on, I don't really know enough to say which this is. So I'll just leave it at that and be on my way.

    3. Re:John Lim was pissed! by GileadGreene · · Score: 1
      John Lim (Hikaru Sulu in New Voyages) playing the character formally played by actor George Takei

      Maybe the problem was that Lim played Sulu too informally. Or did you mean formerly?

    4. Re:John Lim was pissed! by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      >meet his younger self in a time warp created by a worm hole

      gee, how original. How are they going to resolve that, by reversing the polarity of the warp field, or by streaming anti-tachyons from the deflector dish?

      That's the problem I had with Trek when they started getting out of situations with some magical engineering hack all the time.

      I actually liked the idea of "Enterprise" (not the execution, mind you) -- go back to a lower-tech period where there was no Federation yet and humans were just getting started with exploration. Seemed like there was going to be lots of possibilites for interesting stories of first contacts, wars, alliances, crap like that -- but no, more stupid plot devices like the "temporal Cold War".

      After about midway through the second season, I couldn't take it anymore.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    5. Re:John Lim was pissed! by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      That's the problem I had with Trek when they started getting out of situations with some magical engineering hack all the time.

      That's because the most important technology invented in the Star Trek universe was the Deus Ex Machina.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    6. Re:John Lim was pissed! by shirai · · Score: 4, Informative

      Gee, now I feel really bad.

      I tried to make that post so ridiculous that it would never be mistaken for anything but a joke. I was hoping for +4 funny but got +4 interesting instead.

      My apologies to Mr. Lim and Mr. Takei who never said any of those things.

      You see, the joke was, Lim was pissed he lost his role as Mr. Sulu to Takei. Of course, he lost it because Takei IS Mr. Sulu (more or less). Why would Lim be pissed? The irony was supposed be funny (obviously not if you have to explain the joke). The thing about the worm hole was supposed to add to the ridiculousness of the post but I guess in Star Trek, it came across as dead serious.

      Ah well, there goes my mod points...

      --
      Sunny

      Be my Friend

    7. Re:John Lim was pissed! by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      OMGROTFL, that's the best joketroll I've ever SEEN. You just made my friends list for that -- I had indeed taken your original post 100% seriously, because it sounded perfectly plausible in a TREK context. :)

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    8. Re:John Lim was pissed! by saskboy · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, I got the joke even before the worm hole comment, but I perhaps have the same sort of "Onion" humour.

      Boooo Mods!

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    9. Re:John Lim was pissed! by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      "well. So who cares if somebody Chinese plays a character who is incidentally Japanese?"

      I don't care, you don't care. But take a look at Japanese - Chinese relations over the years and you might get an idea of why it's a problem.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    10. Re:John Lim was pissed! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Hey! Be nice now. Some of the Deus were not Ex Machina. They were real.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    11. Re:John Lim was pissed! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      > You see, the joke was, Lim was pissed he lost his role as Mr. Sulu

      You guys don't just know about this, but are arguing about it!

      And I thought me knowing that Yeoman's Rand's (incorrect) cabin number as listed in the Saturday Night Live skit (Y-390) was a nerdly waste of brain cells. Christ almighty, I bow to you.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    12. Re:John Lim was pissed! by scaryjohn · · Score: 1

      So four moderateors don't follow New Voyages? I don't!

      Real Star Trek has gotten in trouble before for ethnically-implausible casting: Chinese Wang as Korean Kim, Korean Park as Japanese Saito. Plus many more instances of implausible casting for which they didn't get in trouble — either because of the viewer demographics, or the fact that the animosity between the actor's and character's groups has subsided: Hispanic Montalbán for Central-Asian Kahn Singh, English actors for the entire French Picard family.

      J. Random Moderator is more likely to have these incidents in mind, and not know that Mr. Lim is a decent, professional actor. Myself included.

      But now that we're all on the same page... LOL!

      --
      One might ask the same about birds. What ARE birds? We just don't know.
    13. Re:John Lim was pissed! by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      Heh, kind of like last night's Battlestar Galactica...

      Who knew that an unborn Cylon/Human hybrid would have blood that could cure advanced, terminal cancer in a matter of minutes!

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    14. Re:John Lim was pissed! by TerranFury · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I do understand. I once had two close friends, both ethnically Chinese: One intensely distrusted the other in large part because the second was a Japanophile; the first felt that it wasn't right to like Japanese culture if you're Chinese. Interestingly, the more nationalistic and anti-Japanese of the two was Chinese-American, and the one who was actually from China - Shanghai - was the Japanophile. Maybe it's like how language evolves more quickly in the mother country (example: Parisian French) than in the colony (example: Quebecois French): When culture branches, it's the culture in the motherland that moves on from the past more quickly.

      Of course, it could also just be because now-booming Shanghai isn't representative of the rest of China. Or maybe it's as simple as that the sample size of my experience is too small.

      At any rate, you're definitely right about the 'why.' I just think that picking scabs on the wounds of history only makes the healing slower. (But as a Caucasian with no stake whatsoever, maybe that's just easy for me to say.)

    15. Re:John Lim was pissed! by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      It did all sound totally plausible in a Star Trek context :-) In fact, the only part that didn't pass the plausbility test was Takei saying the Sulu character was Japanese, insofar as Sulu is not a Japanese name, and morphing the "l" to an "r" wouldn't help (although it would get you the dictionary form of a Japanese verb). I supposed you could make up a history in which he had one Japanese parent and one non-Japanese one, but in what Asian ethnic groups is Sulu a family name? Maybe Chinese. although you'd romanize it differently. Not Korean, I'm pretty sure. I lived in Asia for 9 years and never met anybody named Sulu, or even heard of one.

      Nice joke, anyway :-)

  12. Gossip? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard that George Takei was hiding himself not from just the ignorance and hatred toward homosexuals in the sixties and seventies, but he thought those who employed him would also be prejudicial and deny him opportunities... also more gossip was that he had had sex with Pat Morita in some U.S. Prison camp for suspected Japanese in World War 2... The former is most likely true, the latter, most likely a fib... the only credibility is the dates in the IMDB profiles and Google information/Gossip.

    Pat Morita (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001552/)
    George Takei (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001786/)

  13. _PLEASE_ hire real actors!! by bani · · Score: 2, Informative

    I tried to watch this. I really tried. But the acting was just so horrible...

    Please please please, hire real actors for this thing. No more fans-as-armchair-actors, please....

    1. Re:_PLEASE_ hire real actors!! by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hire?

      You seem to be under a misapprehension. Those shows aren't a commercial venture. They're community theater.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:_PLEASE_ hire real actors!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No more fans-as-armchair-actors, please....

      But what will Shatner do?

  14. Ace! by zenmojodaddy · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Final Fun Queer!

    Sorry, that's bad. But I couldn't help meself.

    I'll get me coat.

    1. Re:Ace! by acid_zebra · · Score: 1

      meh, I got a laugh out of it.

      --
      -- No Sig is a Good Sig
  15. Let's See The Hemlines Already by lseltzer · · Score: 1

    The new Uhura's hot and obviously the new Nurse Chapel can give me a sponge bath anytime, but I liked the old Yeoman Rand better.

    1. Re:Let's See The Hemlines Already by etherlad · · Score: 1

      The "Rand as Tasha Yar" was the idea of director Jack Marshall, who has left New Voyages to pursue his own visions. With him gone, they're going to tone her back down some and have "hired" a new actress: Katrina Kernodle.

      --
      Soylens viridis homines es
  16. No trolling so far? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What, are all the GNAA members asleep or something, or have they all moved to wikipedia now? You'd think they'd jump on an article like this, what with Gay Sulu and all. ...personally, I was convinced ever since the episode where he was running around with the sword and no shirt. linky

  17. Re:Takei is gay by Ardeocalidus · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Yea. Its interesting how, in retrospect, we can look at the influence of past telvision shows in relation to society. The first inter-racial kiss no-doubt made the concept of inter-racial relationships a little bit more acceptable.

    I wonder if modern television shows will have that effect. Will future generations look back at Gina Davis' character and say "Yep, that was the start of it". Did South Park make the concept of cursing and the mix of crude and intelligent humor acceptable? Did Will and Grace help the Gay Right's movement?

    I look forward to 20 years from now when I'll be able to look back at the television programs of my youth and see the full, historic impact they might have had.

  18. No kids == Instant win by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Interesting
    At least this doesn't have annoying kids so that is a plus. I watched the eps they released so far already and it is okay. No it is not going to astound you and it is not going to make non-trekkies into fans of the series.

    But as a person who preffered Star Trek TOS it is a pretty decent effort. They really try to recreate the feel of the original series.

    The acting is... adequate? Passable. Yeah that is it, it is good enough.

    If you like cheesy stuff and are fan of the old series give this a try. It won't be the next big thing but I seen far worse. That norwegian star trek/babylon 5 "comedy" for one.

    At least this is in a proper language.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:No kids == Instant win by Rothron+the+Wise · · Score: 2, Informative

      It won't be the next big thing but I seen far worse. That norwegian star trek/babylon 5 "comedy" for one.

      If you're referring to http://www.starwreck.com/, it's Finnish, not Norwegian.

      --
      A witty .sig proves nothing
    2. Re:No kids == Instant win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you like cheesy stuff and are fan of the old series give this a try. It won't be the next big thing but I seen far worse. That norwegian star trek/babylon 5 "comedy" for one. At least this is in a proper language.
      Firstly, it's Finnish. And secondly, are you implying Finnish isn't a proper language?
    3. Re:No kids == Instant win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "At least this is in a proper language." Oooh! Language bigot, eh? Try to keep your genes out of the pool, takk.

    4. Re:No kids == Instant win by saskboy · · Score: 1

      Star Wreck is from Finland, not Norway. And yes the acting was bad, and you couldn't understand the words, but the special effects were at Deep Space 9's level, and it was as good or better than the acting in New Voyages.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  19. Re:Takei is gay by Councilor+Hart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Star Trek didn't go anywhere, boldly or not, with this. Takei just came out in the last few months. Good for him, but it's not really shocking world news. When I heard this for the first time, I didn't freak out, I didn't applaud him. It was just another outing. It was at best some interesting tidbit.
    Now, what have been really shocking or whatever it might have been, was if the creators of the original series knowingly and purposely hired Takei because he was gay and dedicated a episode to this aspect.
    Star Trek shouldn't be applauded because they unknowingly had a gay helmsman, they should be remember for the other civil rights movement, such as having a character Uhura on board.
    Now if he had come out during the first run of the series, it might have had an impact, in light of the show, in those years. Now, the original series is 30 years old.

  20. I wonder... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    ...with all the uproar about Copyrights and legal battles over who owns what idea, do they pay royalties to Paramount or why aren't they already being swarmed by a beehive of lawyers?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:I wonder... by UrLordMafiu · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've heard from other sources that Paramount let them do this as long as they make no money from it. No Money period. Thats not just a profit, thats no income. As soon as they could be taking money from paramount, they get a call from the lawyers. I think thats why they dont even offer the episodes on dvd, because they would get have to charge, and then be stopped. So its costing them money probably. Which is why theres no money to hire other actors. It appears it's all just for love..

    2. Re:I wonder... by Ardeocalidus · · Score: 4, Informative
      Apparantly, Paramount has a rather symbiote relationship with fan-based creations.

      Paramount provided the original blueprints of TOS' sets.

      In return, Paramount has borrowed a number of props from NY, including the Helmsman's pop-up console.

      All in all, I think it could be profitable for Paramount.

    3. Re:I wonder... by frankmu · · Score: 1

      you are correct. "Bones" from New Voyages is a friend of mine, and he has told me that everyone involved has donated their time, expertise and money to this project. it's a real labor of love for them. paramount gains free publicity for a dormant franchise.

      --
      Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
  21. Where no man... by Kranfer · · Score: 0

    While I am a Star Trek fan, I am also someone who knows when to let something die. I understand that this is Fan Fiction and that from what I hear it is pretty good, but its not Star Trek... I think they should like Star Trek just go into intensive care for about 10 years before wanting to see new Trek like entertainment... ::sighs::

    --
    -- Josh
    "Whoopie! Man, that may have been a small one for Neil, but that's a long one for me!" - Pete Conrad
  22. OAP in charge of Starship shocker! by Teiresias_UK · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've got terrible images of the Enterprise causing multiple pile-up driving at half the speed limit the wrong way down a space-highrway, as Sulu misses the one way signs due to his cataracts ...

  23. Turn the sound down... by Solo-Malee · · Score: 1

    Anyone else waiting for the big chested blonde to come in and sit on Kirk's lap?

    Kudos for trying but...I'll stick to only one genre of bad acting (That needs no sound)

    --
    "If it's lost, it'll turn up. Things always do" "I love it when a plan comes together"
  24. Re:Takei is gay by Ardeocalidus · · Score: 2, Informative
    Apparantly, there was some persecution with the producers of the series because of his orientation. He never officially, and publicly, came out, but to some it was obvious.

    He should be applauded for persuing his career in a time when Gay men weren't openly favored in Hollywood. He never came out, but he never let it stop him.

  25. Re:Takei is gay by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 3, Funny

    A gay man... acting?

    I mean, ya, so what if the gay actor stereotype has been around since man invented fire... Star Trek was the first show to beam a gay man.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  26. Re:Takei is gay by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Takei coming out was one of those well, geeze of course kind of moments. The big question is why he wasn't a blip on anybody's gaydar screen before. I always thought he kind of stood out, but I couldn't quite put my finger on why.

    That said, the actors and the characters are two different things. Having a gay actor (especially a closeted one) play a straight character doesn't count as tackling gay issues. Star Trek in its later editions flirted with lesbian allusions, but so does a lot of porn that is intended for consumption by straight males. It's the idea of masculinity that is the third rail of culture. Most people treat it as too dangerous to go near.

    I don't think male homosexuality had a place in Roddenberry's fantasy life. Judging from what he wrote about some of the Kirk-Spock fan fic, I don't think he liked the idea, although I think he was polite and careful not to dismiss the idea of people having gay Star Trek fantasies. Just not with his characters.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  27. Re:Takei is gay by pipingguy · · Score: 1


    The first inter-racial kiss no-doubt made the concept of inter-racial relationships a little bit more acceptable.

    So many TOS fans cite this as a defining moment. It would have happened anyway.

  28. It's obvious that ST is not dead yet. by master_p · · Score: 4, Interesting

    TOS is dead. TNG is maybe dead. ENT is certainly dead. But people like Star Trek, and a new series would be welcomed by the audience, if it was good enough. The problem is not that the world is tired of Star Trek, the problem is that the last Star Trek series were not that good as the first ones (TOS and TNG). I agree with those guys at startrek.com that it is time for a new Star Trek series, in the style of TNG, with new actors and a new ship, set 20-30 years after TNG. Most of the galaxy is still unexplored!

    1. Re:It's obvious that ST is not dead yet. by musicon · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, they could decide that all of Enterprise was non-canon and redo the timeline under the original premise - no transporters, translators, and without every darn TOS race they could squeeze in. With new writers.

      It would also be nice to see a pickup where DS9 left off, using some of the great novels that have come out for reference.

      Personally, I'd also love to see a movie version of Diane Duane's excellent Dreadnought, as it has a mostly new cast and the handful of older major characters are still alive.

    2. Re:It's obvious that ST is not dead yet. by PPGMD · · Score: 1

      Though I agree that there should be a new Trek set 20-30 years in the future, I don't think it should be based on the TOS and TNG format. I think that DS9 and Babylon 5 has moved SciFi into a more gritty area, I like the story arches that span more then one episode, it gives you more depth into the charecters because you can explorer their flaws a little more. Enterprise started to do this toward the end of the show, but it was too late to save it because the people were already tuning out.

    3. Re:It's obvious that ST is not dead yet. by gnovos · · Score: 1

      The problem is not that the world is tired of Star Trek, the problem is that the last Star Trek series were not that good as the first ones (TOS and TNG)

      Actually, I think the real problem is that the new star trek plots were almost all rehases of OLD star trek plots. Nothing original until the last season.

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    4. Re:It's obvious that ST is not dead yet. by kbonapart · · Score: 1

      I would really be interested in a series, featuring Data as the main chatacter. Star Trek: I, Data. They could really go in-depth with his personality and motivations, instead of his just being a doll for Picard's and LaForge's playtime. Although I am quite pissed at the ending of Nemisis. He could easily have become a captian.

      --
      There are no gods but ourselves.
    5. Re:It's obvious that ST is not dead yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DS9 was the bomb, yo. Only thing that came close was TNG. I had high hopes for Voy and Ent, but they ended up sucking. TOS is moldy.

  29. I Prefer Pirk by rca66 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have seen one episode from this series (It also had an actor from the originial series). It was trash, poorly written, poorly acted and not very entertaining. As a contrast, I really enjoyed the parody "Star Wreck - In the Pirkinning". Stunning CGIs, great look and sound and quite funny story. The actors are mostly amateurs as well, but they seem to be just perfect for this film. I lift my hat to the makers of Star Wreck.

    1. Re:I Prefer Pirk by mknewman · · Score: 1

      I'd definately agree about Star Wreck being awesome! The first Finnish Star Trek fan movie. Full length, near studio quality. Pirk deserves a studio treatment. It worked for Desperado, which was a remake of Rodriguez's El Mariachi. Maybe he can be the next one.

    2. Re:I Prefer Pirk by LinuxRulz · · Score: 1

      Yup, Star Wreck was better, but that's what you get when developping a movie for 7 years. But it doesn't take New Voyages 7 years to make those eps. Besides, I like a lot the old trek style. Less bling bling and more story.

    3. Re:I Prefer Pirk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Less bling bling and more story.

      Yep. A guy named LinuxRulz on Slashdot has just used "bling bling" in a sentence, with a straight face. The term is now officially 100% unhip. Please update your slang dictionaries accordingly.

  30. David Gerrold Has Left Me Trapped In The Amazon by cybrpnk2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I like David Gerrold, and I've enjoyed some of his recent "lighter" SF books including his Dingilliad trilogy, but c'mon, the guy needs to get a move on and finish the next installment of his masterwork, A Method For Madness. I'm still trapped in the Amazon, wondering what happens next in the War Against The Chtorr.

    1. Re:David Gerrold Has Left Me Trapped In The Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'd like him a hell of a lot better if he hadn't stolen the Tribbles story from The Rolling Stones by Robert Heinlein.

    2. Re:David Gerrold Has Left Me Trapped In The Amazon by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Tell ME about it.

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    3. Re:David Gerrold Has Left Me Trapped In The Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were no Klingons in Heinlein's book, and they were "flat cats", not tribbles. That makes ALL the difference.

    4. Re:David Gerrold Has Left Me Trapped In The Amazon by VAXcat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree 100%. Gerrold has claimed that it was accident, and not intentional that he stole the plot from "The Rolling Stones"...to which I reply, bullshit. Anyone who was a rabid Heinlen fan as a youth (as David Gerrold was, by his own admission, and as is obvious from his work), would INSTANTANEOUSLY realize where that plot idea came from, no doubt or hesitation. The only curious thing was that he though no one would call him on it. He discussed it with Heinlein years later, and Heinlein told him he didn't mind, and that he himself had "borrowed" the idea from a short story called "Pigs is Pigs".

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    5. Re:David Gerrold Has Left Me Trapped In The Amazon by greg1104 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The next time I have a long block of spare time, I intend to make a visit to Mr. Gerrold. I plan on lashing him to his word processor until the Chtorr series is complete. I've been watching "Misery" for inspiration and recommended technique.

      Talk about stuff you'd do with a time machine: I have a stop to 1984 planned where I track myself down and say "that series you're about to start? You won't find out how it ends for over 20 years; don't read it yet".

    6. Re:David Gerrold Has Left Me Trapped In The Amazon by stephencrane · · Score: 1

      You know, as you get older and your priorities change with you, it's easy to look back and be a little embarrassed by the things you used to care about. 15 years ago, it was half-Japanese babes, the earnestness of being 'real', New Order and Battletech. You get older, you start to care more about money, your social standing, and how many blocks are you from the subway. Then you start looking forward to visits from your out-of-town parents and moving into that brownstone apartment.

      Next you're deciding what tux you're wearing to the wedding. After that, it's term-life insurance policies and stroller models.

      Here I am, years down the path I started on. I still have those friends, I still have my post-punk music and I still have that Battletech set. I have a nice life- wonderful wife, not loaded but OK and a child very soon to make an appearance. I don't regret any of these things for a moment.

      But to MY DYING DAY, I will always regret stumbling across the Chtorr series immediately after book 4 was published.

      Finding book 1, I did not rest until I had read all 4 in a matter of days. Those were good days, even if the story got a little lost around book 3.

      I had gotten used to waiting a year for the next installment of any series I was into. Year 1 went by, no problems. Year 2 - a little peeved, but ok. Year 3...grumble, grumble. Year 4...WTF? Etc, etc.

      It's now 2006, and back then (I think) was 1992. Fourteen fucking years. That's a long time. Being teased along the way with mentions of plans for books 5-7 elevates that regret to a sweet, sweet spot.

      Illness, family deaths, problem child, single-parent rearing, being gay..."Ja, ja, ja - we've heard all this before." We're talking 14 friggin' years. I don't dismiss his life challenges. He's clearly been capable of writing during hard times. He's published - what? - 10 books in this decade and a half?

      I just don't understand.

      This is going to be John Steakly and _Armor_/_Vampires_ all over again. Gun shy after too much time, pent-up demand and too-high expectations.

      j.b.

    7. Re:David Gerrold Has Left Me Trapped In The Amazon by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      This kind of thing is not entirely uncommon. John Christopher's Tripods are obviously taken from H.G. Wells' War of the Worlds, but the author didn't consciously realise this until it was pointed out to him. Once his attention was drawn to the resemblance, he freely admitted having read War of the Worlds as a child. He stated that, in hindsight, this was obviously where the idea had come from, but at the time he believed the idea to have been original. He speculated that there were probably a number of other things in his books that he had borrowed without realising, and pointed to a number of other examples of authors doing this.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:David Gerrold Has Left Me Trapped In The Amazon by Damvan · · Score: 1

      Not sure where I read it, but it is my understanding that he has no intention of ever finishing the War Against the Chtorr series.

      Because of Gerrold, I never start reading a series until the author has completed writing the entire series. Makes thing difficult sometimes, as it can be hard to find the first few books in the series several years after publishing.

  31. Is Sulu still the Captain of the Excelsior? by digitaldc · · Score: 2, Informative

    Last I heard Sulu was still patrolling the Cardassian border in the U.S.S. Excelsior.
    Maybe he has moved on to seek out new worlds, but he is definitely still kicking butt at 113+ years old!

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Is Sulu still the Captain of the Excelsior? by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      still kicking butt at 113+ years old

      Well, I can't help but recall the observation Cartman made in "Big Gay Al's Big Gay Boat Ride":

      He doesn't appear to be kicking his ass, but he's definitely doing something to it.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:Is Sulu still the Captain of the Excelsior? by FinalCut · · Score: 1

      There was an article in a recent wired magazine about the new voyages episode starring Sulu and they address the apparant dichotomy. It seems that they don't care what happened after the series went off the air. They are trying to make the rest of that origional series episodes. If I recall correctly the original was on for 3 seasons out of a planned 5. This fan group is on the 3rd or 4th episode of season 4 in their mind.

      Because they are working on the episodes that should have happened before the current movies they have chosen to ignore any current information about the show and, instead, are filling in the gaps as they imagine they would have been filled in back in the day.

      The article is online (though I'm not sure if it is complete) at http://wired-vig.wired.com/wired/archive/13.12/sta rtrek.html

  32. Re:Takei is gay by zakezuke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Star Trek shouldn't be applauded because they unknowingly had a gay helmsman, they should be remember for the other civil rights movement, such as having a character Uhura on board.

    What makes me sad is the fact the people have pointed this out... because I never gave it a second thought. I guess it's actually important... the simple fact that they bought all these people together in a situation where it simply was no big deal.

    This is a tad off topic but I recently watched the Warner Brothers banned 11 cartoons. Some of these I actually saw as a kid living in the south... and at the time I would have seen them I had no idea they were attempting to poke fun at african americans... I just assumed there were cool cats and cool dogs in a city called Harlem who were big on skat and jazz. Watching them now makes me feel rather ill. I had to ask my self whether I wanted to archive them or not... but without things like this... big names in Warner Brother's animation... creating these strongly racist cartoons because it again was "no big deal"... without these things people like Martin Luther King, Jr. would have had nothing to complain about... and women like Whoopi Goldberg who grew up with Sherly Temple reruns wouldn't have been excited to see Star Trek and exclaim, "Momma, there's a black lady on tv... and she ain't no maid".

    So yes... I feel ashamed when I have to think about the fact that "I love Lucy" of all things was groundbreaking... a mixed marriage between I presume an Irish Catholic and a Cuban-born musician. I feel even more ashamed when I have to think about the fact that Star Trek featured the first African American woman who wasn't a maid. But I can feel some pride in the fact that much was accomplished over a period of 40 years... though i'll be another 40 years before we as a people trully understand that we share a planet.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  33. Sulu again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OH MY!

  34. Re:Takei is gay by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    >Did South Park make the concept of cursing and the mix
    >of crude and intelligent humor acceptable?

    What a great stride for mankind ;)

  35. It's always good for another vote. by twitter · · Score: 1, Funny
    people like Star Trek, and a new series would be welcomed by the audience, if it was good enough.

    Yeah, I'm still waiting for the reality series but it never seems to get off the ground. GWB is talked about Mars, but he went to Iraq instead. We were supposed to have used nuclear rockets to colonize Mars by now but the projects keep getting shut down and all we are left with is fantasy.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:It's always good for another vote. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that's a good idea - a Star Trek reality show..

      no wait, Doctor Who already did a future Big Brother where contestants would get voted out and vaporised!

  36. Shatner had a great comment about Takei coming out by spywhere · · Score: 5, Funny

    Shatner said this on Jimmy Kimmel's show (which is why nobody heard it) when asked if he had known, back in the '60s, that Takei was gay:
    "Of course I knew... he kept setting his phaser on fabulous!"

  37. I Hope This Episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . . . doesn't backfill us on Sulu and Chekov's occasional "fishing trips" all these years.

    Sorry - "backfill" was a bad choice of words.

  38. Production and Distribution by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    They have come a long way in production and distribution since they first tried this. This is an interesting experiment in Indie movies over the internet. We should all support them just to see how far they can go. Indie music distributors as well as the big companies could learn a thing or two from watching this group. I really hope they stick around.

    I applaud that they now offer their video files via bittorrent. They seem to be surviving the Slashdotting this time (it may even help download speeds). But their download page needs some work. The episodes are in random order, and the formats they offer are kinda weird. For example: 1 episode is a full 4.7GB DVD? And if I want Spanish subtitles it is an entirely different DVD. I don't know what the Special Editions are, and they are only available in a Microsoft proprietary format. That's almost an improvement, since they used to only be available in an Apply proprietary format. When will people start using .mp4? Most often I see things as mpeg-4 AVI files, which is a pretty close approximation to that since it is fully documented and supported on multiple platforms.

  39. And you just got to this now? by Moryath · · Score: 1

    Come on. This was announced months ago.

    1. Re:And you just got to this now? by hawaiian717 · · Score: 1

      The part about Walter Koenig (Chekov) has been known for a while now--that episode has already been filmed and is in post-production--but the news that George Takei (Sulu) will also do an episode is new. Grace Lee Whitney (Rand) was announced a month or two ago.

      --
      End of Line.
  40. Mr. Sulu! Set a course for Uranus! by LanMan04 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Mr. Sulu! Set a course for Uranus!"

    That's all I've got....=)

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
  41. Re:Takei is gay by LegendLength · · Score: 1

    Although, there are some of us who are not racist but also would never consider banning a cartoon because of its content (there would be extreme exceptions of course, like a cartoon showing how to make a real life bomb etc.). I feel this is why you had to consider archiving them or not. They show our cultural history in a way, and are insightful (obviously not insightful for their moral content).

  42. Roddenberry was a visionary on many levels. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm posting this AC because I don't want to karma-whore this little tidbit...

    I must agree with the parent post on Roddenberry's vision. Keep in mind, this was the 1960s. He had a black female officer who outranked several of the white male officers. Also, in the episode "Plato's Stepchildren" we witnessed the first ever inter-racial kiss on TV... Kirk and Uhura. (and Nichelle Nichols was _seriously_ cute in the 60s.)

    Roddenberry was a visionary. His vision for the future appeared to be a world where men and women of all races were equals. I, for one, think that is a grand and laudible vision. I hope that some day it will be true.

    1. Re:Roddenberry was a visionary on many levels. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Pavel better be careful not to get stuck in the airlock alone with Sulu, now that he's out of the closet...

      "And if we don't get them off the ship, we're going to be hip deep in them. [ ...] and from my observations, it seems they're bisexual, reproducing at will. -- and brother, have they got a lot of will."
      - Dr. McCoy, The Trouble With Tribbles

    2. Re:Roddenberry was a visionary on many levels. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      > Hmm...so, with Sulu coming back, will we now have to
      > suffer through the first futuristic, homosexual liplock?

      No fewer than two lesbian, saliva-string kisses have occured. Jadzia Dax-to-guest actress, and Evil Ezri Dax to Evil Kira. Yes, later series chickened out, most notably and unfortunately no Hoshi-to-T'Pol big lip slamathons, though we did get some sweaty/oily mutual backrubbings.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  43. Origin of Tribbles? by kulakovich · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If by Tribbles you mean Martian Flat Cats,
    and by David Gerrold you mean Robert Heinlein...

    You decide...

    kulakovich

  44. Come out and enjoy the news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best news to come out about George since he came out.

    Awesome to have an openly gay commander of a starship.

    As a middle aged gay man you can't imagine how cool it is.

    1. Re:Come out and enjoy the news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best news to come out about George since he came out.

      Awesome to have an openly gay commander of a starship.

      OK, George is gay, but that doesn't mean Sulu is, does it?

  45. Man, you guys are harsh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe how many negative comments there are, especially about the acting. Do you really prefer pap like "Enterprise?" Are slick production, and pretty sparklies all that this is about? This is open source entertainment guys, and Slashdot audiences in particular should value and support it.

  46. Critical point for newvoyages folks by wing03 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Okay.... Gotta get the first part off my chest.

    (flamebait post)
    All you folks who think this fan series is unwatchable and horrible have been too spoiled by Hollywood's offerings and need way too much eye candy (IMO) to suspend your disbelief.

    I'd hate to hear what you folks have to say about classic Dr. Who...
    (/flamebait post)

    That aside, I've been keeping up with New Voyages for the past year and I think they're heading into a critical point in their existance.

    The first movie seemed warmly received and did look a bit amateurish. The second was a vast improvement along with some real characters who played minor roles in the Trek series.

    The third, they're all slap happy patting themselves on the back for netting Walter Koenig and at least it's in post production.

    They're talking episode 4 and 5 now plus George Takei and they've lost Jack Marshall who I got the impression was one of the key guys who helped launch it and see it through, making it a reality.

    From what I've experienced with people who take on a venture with moderate success in the beginning, I'd say it would be possible and probable that they're riding the high of all the media attention garnered so far. They're likely so busy spinning new deals that attention to things such as pre and post production, volunteer/cast/crew relations and all those minor details like the proverbial sidewalk sweeping, bottle washing and etc are falling by the wayside. I'd suspect they're in danger of having the whole thing fall in on itself.

    For the sake of this fan who actually enjoys New Voyages, I'm hoping Jack Marshall wasn't the only driving unifying force that kept everything together.

  47. George’s assocations? by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 1

    I hear he’s a member of the Film Actors Guild.

    (Just teasing people. Sulu is a hero and I am no biggot.)

    1. Re:George’s assocations? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I hear that he's a thespian.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  48. Will the real Walter Koenig please stand up by grimflick · · Score: 1

    Having seen the fully grown up Walter Koenig play Bester on Babylon 5 He is forever washed clean of having ever been Chekov - Bester was such a great character.

    --
    'Only a Barbarian believes that his tribes customs are the laws of nature'
    1. Re:Will the real Walter Koenig please stand up by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      But will he be washed clean of being Oro on Starlost?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  49. Please, no more!! by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Is there a site I can go to and donate to a campaign AGAINST brining back Trek?

    Please folks, let it die with what little dignity it still has left.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Please, no more!! by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Is there a site I can go to and donate to a campaign AGAINST brining back Trek?

      Maybe you should start a fund to get George Lucas to do more Star Wars movies...

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    2. Re:Please, no more!! by genner · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should start a fund to get George Lucas to do more Star Wars movies...

      NOOOO! Star wars must die before Jara Jar gets his own christmas special.

    3. Re:Please, no more!! by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

      You know, would people complain so much about Star Trek if someone could do to it what was apparently done for Battlestar Galactica? I haven't seen any of the new BG, but I hear that it's pretty good sci-fi.

      Keep phasers, keep Sovereign-class and all that, but revamp the crappy parts. Still Star Trek, only it doesn't suck. I guess Enterprise wanted to do that, but that fell on its face. That's what people would want to see: their familiar canon in a decently re-envisioned sci-fi series. I wouldn't want anyone to close their minds to it just because "it's Trek." Of course, Trek as it is might be too deeply entrenched to be recast this way. I don't know.

    4. Re:Please, no more!! by saskboy · · Score: 1

      There's nothing undignified with community theatre. It was the entertainment of kings until television came along. The world would be a better place if there weren't so many uptight losers everywhere that would rather make amateur actors feel bad for doing something with their nights rather than sitting at home reading Slashd... err something else.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    5. Re:Please, no more!! by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      if someone could do to it what was apparently done for Battlestar Galactica

      The problem is that the new BSG was created by a defected Trek writer. Pretty unlikely you would get him to come back.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  50. Re:Production and Distribution, what distribution? by denis-The-menace · · Score: 2, Informative

    What distribution? Their mirrors have ignored them.
    -The BitTorrent page doesn't work.
    -The Official site decided to renumber the episodes by making their pilot episode 0. Meanwhile their mirrors still use the original numbering scheme.
    -You can only get the latest episode ("To Serve All My Day's") from ONE site: Official site. And yes, it's crawling.

    The kicker is that I told the webmaster about all this a week ago.

    --
    Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
  51. Re:Mr. Sulu! Set a course for Uranus! by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    Hey, don't run Sulu down. Sure, the only reason he joined Starfleet was because he wanted to live the 23rd century version of "In the Navy". But how many crewmembers can stear the ship, captain it, AND redecorate it with flair?

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  52. Roddenberry sucked by elrous0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    When Roddenberry died, the franchise lost its soul

    Roddenberry was a vastly overrated hack. Star Trek sucked when he was involved. Star Trek was at its BEST after he was no longer involved. And the best series of the franchise, DS9, was produced after he died.

    Mod me down as flambait if you like, but the man deserves credit ONLY for creating the franchise, nothing more. And there are plenty of writers out there who would argue that his main contribution after he started the franchise was to hold it back.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Roddenberry sucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Roddenberry was a vastly overrated hack. Star Trek sucked when he was involved. Star Trek was at its BEST after he was no longer involved.


      Agreed. I think the later series were much more engaging than the pulp that is TOS.

      And the best series of the franchise, DS9, was produced after he died.


      What are you smoking? I ask because if you think DS9 is the best then that has GOT to be some good shit!
    2. Re:Roddenberry sucked by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny
      I ask because if you think DS9 is the best then that has GOT to be some good shit!

      DS9 was the only Trek series where I thought I might be looking at real human beings. Other Trek series treated their characters as if they were greedless, religionless, sexless robots incapable of even the slightest moral failing or ambiguity.

      And it was also the only Trek series to acknowledge what holodecks would REALLY be used for.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:Roddenberry sucked by kyouteki · · Score: 1

      And it was also the only Trek series to acknowledge what holodecks would REALLY be used for.

      Not the only one...there were a few episodes where the vulcans on Voyager were doing the whole Pn Farr bit, and needed some, er, relief...

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    4. Re:Roddenberry sucked by incubusnb · · Score: 1

      DS9 was the only trek series that completely bored me out of my fucking skull. The acting (while not nearly as bad as the Fan-made show from TFA) was outrageously bad and with the exception of the odd skirmish, it was mostly General Hospital in space without a hospital

      --
      /. is overrun by bed-wetting elitist nerds
      let it be known, for anything other than servers, a *nix OS sucks
    5. Re:Roddenberry sucked by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 2, Funny
      "Other Trek series treated their characters as if they were greedless, religionless, sexless robots incapable of even the slightest moral failing or ambiguity."

      Sexless robots?

      Dr Soong would remind you that Data was "Fully Functional".
      As would Tasha Yar.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    6. Re:Roddenberry sucked by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      And the best series of the franchise, DS9, was produced after he died.

      Oddly enough, I found DS9 to be the least enjoyable, followed closely by Voyager. DS9 was the most "realistic" (I use the term very loosely), but that's part of what made it boring for me.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    7. Re:Roddenberry sucked by John+Nowak · · Score: 1

      Eh. I say it is a tossup as to which sucks more (DS9 or Voyager). I personally feel that TNG was the best of them all (as do all sane people). The captain in Voyager just pissed me off. What a bitch! Leaving behind the enemy to die just because they're your enemy. Picard never would've done that. He'd of scooped them up and had tea.

    8. Re:Roddenberry sucked by hey! · · Score: 1

      Roddenberry was a vastly overrated hack.

      Never said otherwise. But professionalism is not all it's cracked up to be. Professionalism without passion means you are not going to embarass yourself. Passion without professionalism ensures you are going to embarass yourself.

      At the end of the day, it's more important to have passion.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    9. Re:Roddenberry sucked by operagost · · Score: 1

      Kirk would have beamed over, kicked their asses some more, THEN left after turning on their self-destruct sequence.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    10. Re:Roddenberry sucked by MayorDefacto · · Score: 1
      Kirk would have beamed over, kicked their asses some more, THEN left after turning on their self-destruct sequence.

      ...you left out the part where he has sex with a green chick. THEN he would turn on the self-destruct sequence and leave her behind.

      "Yeah, that was nice babe, but I gotta get going..."

    11. Re:Roddenberry sucked by ex-geek · · Score: 1
      DS9 was the only Trek series where I thought I might be looking at real human beings. Other Trek series treated their characters as if they were greedless, religionless, sexless robots incapable of even the slightest moral failing or ambiguity.

      And DS9 was a pretty lame and awkward attempt to overcome that.

      The first tv show that had real human beings in it was Seinfeld. Everything before that was way to PC.

      Real human beings simply don't fit into all genres or stories anyway.
    12. Re:Roddenberry sucked by xtieburn · · Score: 1

      'Other Trek series treated their characters as if they were greedless, religionless, sexless robots incapable of even the slightest moral failing or ambiguity'

      Well done you have completely missed the whole point of Star Trek. Its a _utopian_ society it was made to be a _utopian_ society, the whole basis of the series is that they are a _utopian_ society. The idea of each episode was to have something or other attack there values, and their _utopian_ society. Then they had to get out of it without compromising their _utopian_ ideals.

      People dont watch Star Trek for its gritty realism or dysfunctional characters theres plenty of that on TV in just about every other program. Its an optimistic view of what humanity can achieve, but you appear to not be able to accept that as being possible at all. Which speaks volumes.

      As for DS9 it trampled all over the ideas that made Star Trek what it was and as the seasons went on it turned in to a poor rip off of the under appreciated Babylon5. A universe within which terrorism, greed and corruption actually made sense.

    13. Re:Roddenberry sucked by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      The captain in Voyager just pissed me off.

      Yeah, she's pretty much what killed it for me, too. But for me, it was mostly because she was "Superwoman". She was like Kirk, Picard, Spock and Scotty all combined into one. A know-it-all captain that basically needed no crew to operate her ship got to be pretty boring after a while. Maybe if they had given her some basic strengths and weaknesses (and a few character flaws), it would have been a little more entertaining.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    14. Re:Roddenberry sucked by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      May your party this weekend be attended by Abe Vigoda and Ernest Borgnine engaged in Vulcan finger sex.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    15. Re:Roddenberry sucked by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Kirk (with a ripped shirt) is one of only two non-meta people (the other is Sean Connery 007) who it's generally agreed could beat up Batman.

      Well, I suppose Frank Miller's Marv could also beat up modern, which is to say, Frank Miller's Batman.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    16. Re:Roddenberry sucked by John+Nowak · · Score: 1

      I get the feeling they were overcompensating due to her gender. A Battlestar Galactica-style female leader would've been much more interesting i feel. You know... someone with feelings.

    17. Re:Roddenberry sucked by RussR42 · · Score: 1
      Ah, I can't get into this flamewar, I'll get too excited. So here's the comic relief:

      Takei: Let's take 'em out with us. Do you guys have a self-destruct code? Like "destruct sequence 1-A, 2-B, 3--"
      [Bender's head explodes, leaving some wires, coils and his mouth poking out of his body.]
      Bender: Thanks a lot, Takei, now everybody knows!

    18. Re:Roddenberry sucked by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Its an optimistic view of what humanity can achieve

      God help us if we ever become that boring.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    19. Re:Roddenberry sucked by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      A Battlestar Galactica-style female leader would've been much more interesting i feel. You know... someone with feelings.

      Okay, Voyager writers, once more with feeling.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    20. Re:Roddenberry sucked by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Talent and passion have to go hand-in-hand. By themselves, they are worthless. Passion without talent is stupidity and talent without passion is wasted.

      I would argue that Roddenberry had neither in any significant quantity. The people he hired were the ones who really deserve the credit (especially the much-maligned Trek writers).

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    21. Re:Roddenberry sucked by xtieburn · · Score: 1

      Ill take interstellar star ships and utopian societies over the countless abhorant acts that occur on Earth today.

      Heck you can say that you find watching a near perfect society like in Star Trek is boring, but youd need your head looking at if youd prefer to live in a world with rape, murder, poverty, illness, and a whole host of other atrocities. As opposed to a world where all of it has been abolished, whilst accomplishing even greater freedoms across the whole of humanity than we have in the best nations today.

    22. Re:Roddenberry sucked by hey! · · Score: 1

      Talent and passion have to go hand-in-hand.

      I'd go farther, and say that talent, passion and experience go hand in hand. Ideally, these factors are not only present, but in a sense balanced.

      I would argue that Roddenberry had neither in any significant quantity.

      I'd disagree with you though. He certainly went to bat for some unusual ideas, such as a major character who was an alien. This indicates a certain level of passion. Probably too much: thing that curdles a lot of Trek is a kind of arrant, naive earnestness that's painful to watch.

      But in the end, Rodenberry created something that connected with a lot of people. That's an accomplishment.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    23. Re:Roddenberry sucked by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      talent, passion and experience go hand in hand

      Good point.

      But in the end, Rodenberry created something that connected with a lot of people. That's an accomplishment.

      True, but I'm not sure if this was his actual intent or just a case of someone striking a chord that resonanates with the public in an unexpected way.

      From what I know of Roddenberry, he strikes me as a classic TV veteran who didn't really seek to create a "revolutionary" show. I gather he basically wanted to create a fairly traditional western set in space (something that would differentiate it from all the other westerns on the air at the time, but would still allow the classic formulas to be used). Now, that was somewhat revolutionary just in itself. But I don't think he had any idea how revolutionary it would really be.

      Now, it's pretty much a moot point. He DID create it, and it DID become revolutionary. Intent may not even matter in the end. But I still don't think he deserves the near-God-like status he has today, especially in view of the very hard work of so many talented writers and directors who would follow him and really give Trek its "soul."

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    24. Re:Roddenberry sucked by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Heck you can say that you find watching a near perfect society like in Star Trek is boring, but youd need your head looking at if youd prefer to live in a world with rape, murder, poverty, illness, and a whole host of other atrocities.

      Of course I don't like atrocities. But I don't want to give up my humanity either. Nor do I find it appealing to engage in utopian fantasies so divested from reality as to be laughable.

      That's why I like DS9. It struck a realistic balance between human passions, human faults, and our desire to do good and make a better world. It felt much more POSSIBLE than the other Trek series.

      The characters on TNG, in contrast, acted like automatons (pretty sad when the actual automaton on the show often showed more human qualities than the humans). I never once believed that anying on TNG was even remotely possible, or even particularly desirable.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    25. Re:Roddenberry sucked by xtieburn · · Score: 1

      'But I don't want to give up my humanity either.'
      I dont see how the people of Star Trek have in any way given up there humanity. Infact they appear to have it in abundance.

      'Nor do I find it appealing to engage in utopian fantasies so divested from reality as to be laughable.'
      A real glass half empty kind of a guy arnt you. I dont think anyone thought it was a real possibility that the whole thing would occur but it is definately something to aspire to and becomes far more realistic when you take in to account that they have both infinite power generation and infinite resources.

      'It felt much more POSSIBLE than the other Trek series.'
        It attempted to have a workable monetry system in a universe that everything you could ever want is free. (See previous post and comment about B5 along with the fact that it actually makes sense.)

      'The characters on TNG, in contrast, acted like automatons'
      The captain, a stern man with family difficulties and an unrequited love for the doctor.
      First officer, more gung ho, woman loving and wreckless than his captain but when it comes down to it hell pull things off just as well.
      Security officer, a klingon in the federation with all of the baggage that comes with it. Pasionate about his heritage but also pasionate about his work which often conflicts.
      Coucilor, an empath who had a relationship with the first officer which causes jealousy issues with her other relationships. Has a crazy mother.

      I could go on but by now it should be clear that these people are far from automotons. They have many of the failings that every human does. Jealousy, conflicts, family trouble, relationship trouble, every problem your average human has to deal with. The difference is that theres no one that feels the need to kick someone to death, start a war, or as in DS9 become terrorists in an annoying non sensical battle on par with the petty crap we have today.

      'or even particularly desirable.'
      (See previous post about head issues.)

  53. "Brokeback Planet" by peter303 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The new episode will be called "Brokeback Planet" after the awarding movie movie. Commander Sulu returns to Star Fleet HQ in San Francisco (some things dont change in three centuries) for his annual fling with an old classmate.

    1. Re:"Brokeback Planet" by spepper · · Score: 1

      how bad can the new storyline be? um, well, let's see-- the characters become SHEEP FARMERS! (and sponsored by K Y JELLY)

  54. As is David Gerrold by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 1

    I'm actually reading a book called Blood and Fire which has a preface stating that the original idea was for a Star Trek Next Generation episode which had a gay character in it. Evidently Gene Roddenbury's lawyer read the script, freaked out, and it never saw the light of day. It's a bit of a shame. Blood and Fire would have made a good Start Trek episode.

  55. Eek. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a “bigot” either.

  56. Re:Takei is gay by generic-man · · Score: 1

    After that news story broke (Takei "officially" coming out) I did a Google Groups search for takei and gay. The earliest hit was a posting in 1985. The earliest hit that related to Takei as the one who was gay? Early '90s, still back in the day when you meant "USENET" when you said "the Internet."

    --
    For more information, click here.
  57. They wanted to get James Doohan... by windowpain · · Score: 1, Funny

    They wanted to get James Doohan to play Scotty until Leonard Nimoy told them, "He's dead Jim."

    (For those who don't get it "He's dead Jim" is supposedly the most frequently used line of dialog in the original series.)

    --
    Insert witty sig here.
    1. Re:They wanted to get James Doohan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (For those who don't get it "He's dead Jim" is supposedly the most frequently used line of dialog in the original series.)

      Is this a joke or did you forget that this is slashdot ?

    2. Re:They wanted to get James Doohan... by brouski · · Score: 1
      (For those who don't get it "He's dead Jim" is supposedly the most frequently used line of dialog in the original series.)

      If you have to explain it...

      --
      Proud member of the American Non Sequitur Society. We might not make much sense, but boy do we love pizza!
  58. Somebody tell. . . by phishtrader · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Somebody tell David Gerrold to get off his ass, quit screwing around, and finish the next War Against the Chtorr novel. The last one came out in 1992, if I took this long to finish my projects I'd be out of a job!

    1. Re:Somebody tell. . . by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 2, Funny

      What do you expect, I'm stuck in the Amazon...

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
  59. Not the first interracial kiss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure Kirk kissed some green chicks before kissing Uhura.

  60. Energizer (TM) battery company called by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    They are claiming IP on this - they can't keep on going and going and going too! Only the Energizer bunny can do that. What happens if you put the bunnies batteries in backwards? He keeps on ......

  61. Re:Takei is gay by Councilor+Hart · · Score: 1

    Ah, if some knew back then, and he continued despite this, than yes give him all credit due. But in the episodes and films I saw, Sulu was never portrayed as gay. So no need to worship Star Trek itself because one of its actors came out of the closet. Star Trek didn't stand up for gay rights, Takei now does.

  62. Re:Takei is gay by zakezuke · · Score: 1

    I feel this is why you had to consider archiving them or not. They show our cultural history in a way, and are insightful (obviously not insightful for their moral content)

    I had to consider archiving them because I had to ask my self two questions.

    1. Would I ever watch these again

      The jazz and skat ones actually are as you say part of our cultural history. They do actually show a very power influence in American music and are worth it on that note. There are a few in that batch that I would not enjoy watching.

    2. Would I show them to someone else

      There are a few in that batch that are down right rude as hell. And i'm not talking Tom and Jerry blackface rude which... well to me isn't offencive but apparently the censors are none to fond of it.

    But needless to say they're getting burnt onto cd. Otherwise they could be lost.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  63. No, DS9 sucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And the best series of the franchise, DS9, was produced after he died.

    Thanks, you just re-affirmed why Roddenberry was the heart and soul of Star Trek. Deep Space 9 completely detracted from the predecessors. I liked TOS and TNG because of the element of exploration, learning new things, innovation, the inventions, and so forth. Deep Space 9 lacked all of that. I initially thought DS9 had some things going for it (i.e. the wormhole, the shape-shifter, etc.) but unfortunately DS9 did not take advantage of what it had. I couldn't get past the first season after giving up and saying, "This isn't Star Trek."

    1. Re:No, DS9 sucked by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      exploration

      Wandering the galaxy bringing self-righteous Federation "enlightenment" to the universe with bombastic speeches isn't exploration--it's hubris and arrogance.

      Trek writers needed to spend some time exploring the concept of "character development." They might have learned that real characters EVOLVE over time (and Rikers's expanading waistline doesn't count).

      Not that chracter development matters much when all your characters are stock and one-dimensional to begin with. You'd think that, in all that technobabble, they would have picked up the term "multi-dimensional" at some point.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:No, DS9 sucked by Nataku564 · · Score: 1

      Yeah ... cuz ... like data was totally android-ish by the end of TNG, and Picard still hated kids, and Wesley was still annoying and Tasha was still around and ... hmm ...

    3. Re:No, DS9 sucked by ejp1082 · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I never liked Star Trek when it got all soap opera-ish. It's not a character show, that's not why I ever watched it. It's a show about ideas, and the characters only served to show how the traits they represented dealt with those ideas. (When done right, anyway)

      Not that I have any problem with real character driven shows. But love triangles in Star Trek never felt right to me - it was never a show about the characters, it was just a thinly veiled philosophy class.

    4. Re:No, DS9 sucked by masdog · · Score: 1

      Its odd that the most multi-dimensional character in the show would be the one who should have been the most one dimension.

  64. Im Sure There's A Joke In There... by LEX+LETHAL · · Score: 1

    Takai is gay and the writer of the Tribbles episode is back. Can you say "Wack-A-Mole at warp speed"?

  65. Off Topic by rizole · · Score: 1

    Sorry folks but I couldn't resist. Here is a picture of George Takei that hasn't been seen by anyone but my family for over 30 years

  66. Re:Production and Distribution, what distribution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To Serve All My Days hasn't even been released yet, so you know, that might be your problem with trying to download it.

  67. Good writing and cast chemistry by lildogie · · Score: 1

    I enjoyed TOS and TNG because of the great writing (by a variety of _writers_ instead of a screenplay mill), the amazing chemistry of the cast, and because of the themes about how good humanity _could_ be. My kind of fantasy.

    I stopped watching TNG reruns and started watching _The_West_Wing_ reruns for for the latter two reasons.

  68. How did I not hear of this series? by MS-06FZ · · Score: 1

    It's surprising to me. I mean, I read a lot of sci-fi model-making related forums, and discussion there turns to "Starship Exeter" from time to time, I would have thought there'd be some mention of this thing, too, since it's doing the same sort of thing... Though without doing any actual miniatures, I'm guessing (whereas Exeter started with some miniatures and then switched to CGI - you can see some of Tom Sasser's excellent, though unused work on his site http://www.thomasmodels.com/

    --
    ---GEC
    I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
  69. Here's An Episode Idea by cmplus · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Sulu and Chekov get sued by PriceLine for failing to pay for a room they shared on Rigel 7. PriceLine and the hotel are represented by William Shatner and David Spader. Spader, it turns out, also stayed at the hotel using a Stargate VIP comp. for weekenders only. In and out in the blink of an eye. Sulu and Chekov try to hire the firm of Gould and Romulan to represent them but can't come up with the retainer. Instead, they're assigned public defender Wil Wheaton who can't start 'til Monday because he's out in Vegas playing in a poker tournament.

    I'd sit for that.

  70. Re:Takei is gay by LegendLength · · Score: 1

    I worry a bit because a lot of the jokes in more modern cartoons are based on stereotypes.

    I do understand that some of those old cartoons would cause a riot if shown, and so I wouldn't really push the issue. It's just that it feels like the thin edge of the wedge to me, because it's so subjective to say what is tasteless and what is a funny jab at a sterotype (e.g. is a "white men can't dance" joke unshowable?).

  71. Trek to the noonch... by MsGeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Alternatively, they could decide that all of Enterprise was non-canon and redo the timeline under the original premise - no transporters, translators, and without every darn TOS race they could squeeze in. With new writers.

    Kevin Smith has offered several times to write a new Trek series. Give Smith a crack at this. Make sure Berman and Braga are kept as far away as possible from it. Maybe even allow some humor in the series...what a concept!

    My idea of what Enterprise should have been would be a return to the '60s idea of the future from TOS. Captain Archer should be a free-lovin', two fisted prototype for Kirk. T'Pol should be Spock with tits and sexual tension between her and Archer. (Never, EVER allow this to be consummated.) The visual look of the show should be TOS with better production values and '60s retro-futurism. Miniskirted uniforms for female crew members! Bio-engineered Klingons without silly putty on their foreheads! It would rock.

    Imagine all that and Kevin Smith directing. Now that is something I'd watch religiously.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:Trek to the noonch... by ejp1082 · · Score: 1

      The most frustrating thing about Star Trek is when you think about how good it could have, should have been. Especially the newer series.

      Voyager? A ship tossed 75 years from home, with no way to resupply, two crews with opposing ideals forced to work together for sheer survival? That should have been a fantastic series, the number of stories that could be told from that premise is practically infinite. But by the third episode it was a standard federation happy crew with a token reference to running out of supplies and energy rations. Bleh.

      Enterprise? Mankind's first interstellar ship, exploring an younger galaxy, with untested technologies like transporters and warp drives, meaning that they'd be technologically inferior to just about everyone we met - with a series long plot arc revolving around the origins of the federation, starfleet, and the prime directive? Again, there's an infinite amount of story potential there, but none of it ever came close to being realized, and instead we got some nonsense about a "temporal cold war" with an episode about the borg when they ran out of ideas?

      The problem with Star Trek clearly lies in the producers and writers. Give the franchise to *anyone* else, please. Kevin Smith, Joss Whedon, anyone that'll take it. Reboot the whole thing. Do it right, let the series live up to its potential for once.

    2. Re:Trek to the noonch... by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 1

      Uh . . . considering what the New Voyages folks have been able to crank together on their own, and comparing that the what Smith has already proven he *can* do on his own, and then taking into account that the guy basically wrote his own franchise and is, in all honesty, sitting rather pretty . . .

      I don't think Smith needs to ask permission. He can, I'm sure, do an original series fan production *at least* as well as the New Voyages crew. I can dig that he'd like to get paid for it, but the NV crew *can't* make money off of their work, and nonetheless, they rock at it.

      Let him ((or any other big-name-of-the-moment) put up his own money and do it for love. That's what the fans do, and they keep the show alive.

      Smith can buy a lot of extra garages to use for sets, is all I'm saying.

  72. What we really need by Mad+Ogre · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Is for serious fans to make their own Firefly series. Forget this Star Trek crap. Firefly is where its at.

    --
    MadOgre.com
  73. Queer Eye for the Trekkie Guy by Pchelka · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think Queer Eye for the Straight Guy should do a special with George Takei at a Star Trek Convention. Most of the guys I've talked to at Star Trek conventions seem like nice people, but some of them would definitely benefit from being shot with a phaser set on "fabulous."

  74. Speaking for George by the_mushroom_king · · Score: 1, Funny
    When I say, "Fabuloussss!"

    Just kidding, hes a great actor and I was a big fan TOS in my childhood.

    As people mentioned, TOS was revolutionary in the 60's. It featured the first inter-racial (black/white) kiss seen on TV.

    Where else can you find a planet-eating space monster that looks like a roach (half smoked marijuana cigarette). I imagine the writers sitting around the table passing a doobie when they came up wuth that one ;).

  75. Re:Takei is gay by students · · Score: 1

    Originally there were plans for a character called "Number One" who would be the (female) second in command. The plan was changed by studio execs. Hence the oddness about Spock being both Science Officer and second in command.

  76. "Sulu" Japanese? Uh ... by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 1

    Well the given name "Hikaru" is indeed Japanese. But shouldn't "Sulu" be "Suru"?

    Or maybe we are to believe that in the distant future, Japanese phonetics will acquire the L sound?

    1. Re:"Sulu" Japanese? Uh ... by MS-06FZ · · Score: 1

      The pronunciation is actually more how most American speakers would say "Sulu" IMO. When Americans make the "r" sound they tend to drag it out (at least in my experience.) The "r" in Japanese is sort of like the "r" in Spanish, a flick of the tongue almost like a "d". The "l" sound in English (as I speak it anyway) is closer to this than "r".

      I looked briefly at that page and I kind of thought their Sulu didn't look Japanese... But, really, the whole idea of them recasting well-established characters just strikes me as weird anyway. That simply is not done, unless the character is a British secret agent (and I think it'd be keen if the different James Bonds were treated as different people - with "007" and "James Bond" being just code names handed down the line...) or a timelord.

      --
      ---GEC
      I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
  77. Cool, remeber, its about exploring unknowns etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I likeit!! It's cool that they are getting actors from the original series....I like all the star trek series and it's really cool that these new series are being produced!!

    After all, we will be getting close to the singularity in about 20 years or so....

  78. Ballroom bloody Dancing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now there's a thought! That would make an interesting TV show... imagine gladiator-style ballroom dancing where the participants wear various armored costumes and wield various medieval or post-apocalyptic style of hand-to-hand combat weapons. Imagine a team composed of Rutger Hauer's character from "The Blood of Heroes (Juggers)" and Tina Turner's character from "Thunderdome" opposing another similar team... all beating the bloody hell out of each other while lovingly choreographed to some exciting Rhumba or Tango music.

    Now that would be absolutely British indeed!

  79. Time for the Gay Frontier? by Christopher+B.+Brown · · Score: 1

    What with Takei having "come out," and Gerrold having done so probably 30 years ago, this probably has some, erm, "pretty gay possibilities."

    --
    If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
  80. Female first officer on Pike's ship by MS-06FZ · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that was in the pilot. Majel Barrett played her, IIRC.

    --
    ---GEC
    I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
  81. Set the Slashdot Phaser to DDOS! by Heembo · · Score: 1

    So how long until this image-laden (poorly optimized) site gets slashdotted?

    --
    Horns are really just a broken halo.
  82. Why all these TOS fan films? by MS-06FZ · · Score: 1

    You know, it's cool in a way when fan groups make TOS-inspired fan films, replicating cheesy old special effects, or (in the case of Starship Exeter) using some actual, physical models rather than going to CGI for every little thing. (Sadly, they seem to be going to CGI now...) But I really wish they'd do something a little more challenging. Phase 2, and later the original Star Trek movie, tried to take the original show in new directions. Better effects to portray a more tangible world and vaster dangers in it. New characters. But still with strong ties to the original material.

    Take Star Trek: The Motion Picture, for instance. It was basically an adaptation of "The Changeling", so the story's quite basic. It shows its 1970's aesthetic in the earth-tones in some of the sets and costumes, which now look dated. It had huge budget and deadline problems, which resulted in the theatrical release being flawed and accounted for some of the movie's dryness and padding. But the thing was a work of art. The Enterprise never before or since (including the sequel Star Trek films) looked more beautiful. The abstract "cloud" art seems like nothing special, but it was a labor of love by talented artists. Considerable time, attention, and money was spent giving the classically flat, cheap world of TOS some depth. One can write off the advantages of better special effects as "flash without substance" but in fact they do count for something. Never in TOS did they succeed in portraying an alien threat as being so vast as to be truly humbling.

    Obviously one advantage of replicating the original Star Trek in fan film form is that the original was cheaply produced, so to some extent the fan films are also cheap to produce... But I find it disappointing. All this creative energy, all this effort, could be channeled into making something new and unique. "The New Voyages" even gives a nod to TMP's tagline, "The Human Adventure" and all that, but set, costume, and prop design is at best replicas. Character portrayal at best aspires to mimickry (less so on Exeter, though.) Meanwhile there's about 13 years of blank space in between TMP and Wrath of Khan in which somebody could write a script around another refit Constitution class (or Enterprise Class, or Starship II class, if you prefer) and create their own vision for what "Phase 2" could have been.

    Perhaps my logic is flawed, and mimicking TMP is no more creative a goal than mimicking the original Star Trek - merely a more expensive enterprise (pun intended). I guess I feel that TMP was the turning point for Star Trek's future potential. They were willing to pour money into it hoping for a repeat of Star Wars success, but that failed so they went low-budget and low-brow for the next ten years. It was the first "do-over", the first attempt to re-define Trek for a new run, but that attempt gave way to the version given in the sequels. The sequels offered some good innovations as well (Excelsior, Klingon Bird of Prey) but they never again attempted to make Trek more than it had become. As a Star Trek fan, that is what I think would make a cool fan film. As a modeler, that is the period of Star Trek that I think would be most engaging.

    --
    ---GEC
    I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
  83. Re:Takei is gay by snuf23 · · Score: 1

    "e.g. is a "white men can't dance" joke unshowable?"

    No, but a "black men can't read" joke is. It's ok to sterotype and make fun of white people no matter what. If you are black you can make fun of black people and stereotypes as well as whites. If you are white you cannot.
    It's not just that way for blacks, pretty much the same thing for any minority in the US.
    This is called being politically correct.

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  84. People are missing the point by Guspaz · · Score: 1

    It doesn't matter if the acting isn't up to par. It's a fan production, and nobody is forcing you to watch it. I mean, they have fun MAKING it, isn't that enough? And some of us think it is cool to see the enormous amount of former guest-stars, main stars, writers, Roddeberry family, etc, putting on a good show.

    Personally, I can look past the acting. The CG is a bit annoying, since while it LOOKS good they have the Enterprise doing loop-de-loops that even the Defiant couldn't dream of pulling off. Watching the 60s show, the ship didn't move very fast. I'd be OK with modern-day trek style ship movement, but it is a bit disconcerting seeing the CG Enterprise move as if somebody is waving it around in front of a camera ;)

    Still, I enjoy it.

    1. Re:People are missing the point by wing03 · · Score: 1

      The CG is a bit annoying, since while it LOOKS good they have the Enterprise doing loop-de-loops that even the Defiant couldn't dream of pulling off. Watching the 60s show, the ship didn't move very fast. I'd be OK with modern-day trek style ship movement, but it is a bit disconcerting seeing the CG Enterprise move as if somebody is waving it around in front of a camera ;)

      The CG in the first episode looked far more believable and along the lines of Babylon 5/BSG 2004.

      Considering we are probably talking 100s or 1000s of tonnes of ship in 0G here...

      I was on the newvoyages board and they defended the CG ship movement in the second episode, likening it to someone on a surfboard causing it to lurch and such. Essentially that it was the pilot giving the ship some "personality."

      That didn't do anything for my take on the physical believability. But still, it was good storytelling.

  85. Re:Takei is gay by zakezuke · · Score: 1

    "e.g. is a "white men can't dance" joke unshowable?"

    No, but a "black men can't read" joke is. It's ok to sterotype and make fun of white people no matter what. If you are black you can make fun of black people and stereotypes as well as whites. If you are white you cannot.
    It's not just that way for blacks, pretty much the same thing for any minority in the US.
    This is called being politically correct.


    Basicly. Part of the reason some of the episodes of the banned 11 are so bad is because they sort of cross this line. I know it's hard to imagine, but back in the 1970s and 1980s there was a busing program to help integrate the schools. This was actually important because there were still many towns where the population was not integrated at all.... and education was not equal among all schools. I lived in a town where it was not unusual for highschool graduates to be illiterate. Not talking unread, we're talking can't read a recipe out of a cook book.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  86. Original poster should RTFA by etherlad · · Score: 1
    New Voyages scored Takei and Gerrold, but Gerrold is not writing the Sulu episode.

    From TFA:
    [David Gerrold] will be writing two stories for the series. One will be a sequel to "The Trouble With Tribbles" that he says is based on an idea he had for many years. "There is a twist," Gerrold explained. "What starts out funny won't be. It will become a horror story."

    Gerrold's other story will be a reworked version of "Blood and Fire", an episode he originally pitched when he was a staff member at Star Trek: The Next Generation which was ultimately rejected for its controversial content, dealing with an AIDS-like virus and the theme of homosexuality.
    ...
    The episode in which Takei will appear, "World Enough And Time", will be co-written by Marc Scott Zicree and Michael Reaves. Zicree penned the Deep Space Nine episode "Far Beyond the Stars", in which Captain Sisko lives the life of an oppressed 20th century writer, while Reaves pitched a Sulu story for the never-produced Star Trek: Phase II that Paramount cancelled to make Star Trek feature films.

    --
    Soylens viridis homines es
  87. Yes, Japanese, in theory by achurch · · Score: 1
    As the other reply notes, the English pronunciation "Sulu" is closer to the Japanese suru; I've seen arigatou spelled "aligato" in news articles before as well.

    In any case, STIV (the novel) lays out clearly that Sulu is Japanese, when he meets his great^N-grandfather Akira in the past; IIRC, there was supposed to be a similar scene in the movie as well but it got scrapped when they couldn't get the Japanese child they had picked for the role to cooperate. On the other hand, despite having lived in Japan for seven years I have yet to come across Suru/Sulu as a family name--and in the Japanese version he got renamed to Kato, says Wikipedia. Maybe Roddenberry didn't do his homework?

  88. Big congratulations to those guys at new voyages! by master_p · · Score: 1

    I have just finished viewing the 1st episode. Although it was not all that professional, all I can is: congratulations! incredible work! keep it up! at times it felt like a TOS episode. I guess these guys are really lucky that they got to play out their fantasies! and they also have incredible guts in doing this, because they are gonna be measured up against professional actors and big budgets...

  89. CG TOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I envision the missing years of TOS done in photo realistic CG using the original actors voices from the original series and creating a voice modulation program that would allow voice actors to use their own voice but sound like the original characters. Of course these voice actors would have to be able to convincingly recreate the emotion and acting styles of the original characters.

  90. Does Bit Torrent suck...? by braindrainbahrain · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or does it take everybody three whole days to download the first episode on bit torrent?Or does comcast just suck...? Oh, yeah they do! But what about bit torrent? How can I get these episodes in my lifetime?

  91. What New Voyages is doing by Announcer · · Score: 1

    I've seen a fair amount of misinformation, here. New Voyages has their own message board, and I would encourage my fellow Slashdotters to check it out. (Batten down the servers! There's an Ion Storm a-comin'!)

    The New Voyages team is doing this out of love for the show. As someone correctly pointed out, they can NOT make money at all. It is 100% out-of-pocket from the poeple who are doing it. Considering this, you have to give them a lot of credit... they are making a very watchable version of TOS Star Trek, and even including the actual, original actors.

    While some here are complaining about the quality of the acting, don't forget the fact that New Voyages is currently *the biggest* of the Fan-produced Star Trek series. The proof is in the fact that they are getting so many of the well-known original actors and writers from Hollywood to come down and participate. This truly sets it apart from all other Trek Fan Fiction.

    Go to the WEBsite http:http://www.startreknewvoyages.com/ and click the link to their message boards. It's a large group of people just like you and me that have gotten together to pool their resources to bring back childhood memories and have a whole lot of fun doing it. I for one enjoyed it, and I am looking forward to the next episode, "To serve all my days" with Walter Koenig reprising his role as Chekov.

    --
    Willie...
  92. Re:Takei is gay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crap. Yes and no. Now I have to find my "Making of" paperback out of our moving boxes. The one thing I remember was that Number One was supposed to be a Martian, the ears were for hearing in a low pressure environment. And all the Enterprises originally looked like gas tankers.

    Rick DeBay

  93. Mesa dreama of a white Christmas by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    It muye muye good to see so many of you hear for mesa Christmas special!

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.