Slashdot Mirror


Brain Surgery Patient Trapped in a Mental Time Warp

diverge_s writes "BrainConnection has an interesting article about a man who lives life straight out of the movie Memento. FTA: "When twenty-seven year old Henry M. entered the hospital in 1953 for radical brain surgery that was supposed to cure his epilepsy, he was hopeful that the procedure would change his life for the better. Instead, it trapped him in a mental time warp where TV is always a new invention and Truman is forever president. The removal of large sections of his temporal lobes left Henry unable to form any new personal memories, but his tragic loss revolutionized the field of psychology and made "H.M." the most-studied individual in the history of brain research.""

338 comments

  1. On the bright side... by jd · · Score: 5, Funny

    It means he never has to put up with re-runs on television and got to escape the entire disco era unscathed.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:On the bright side... by Rosyna · · Score: 0

      Indeed.

      If you haven't seen it, it's new to you.

    2. Re:On the bright side... by Saven+Marek · · Score: 5, Funny

      It means he never has to put up with re-runs on television and got to escape the entire disco era unscathed.

      I'm now wondering if he's been employed as a slashdot editor, and every dupe is a fresh exciting new story.

    3. Re:On the bright side... by ePhil_One · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What does he think when doctors walk in with cell phones, digital cameras, and PDA's?

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    4. Re:On the bright side... by errxn · · Score: 1

      Plus, if he's writing headlines like Brain Surgery Patient Trapped in a Mental Time Warp, you also really have to wonder if he's pilfering from the Weekly World News.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    5. Re:On the bright side... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      "I watched that Peak Practice."
      "Yeah, I've never seen it."
      "Bloody repeat."
      "Annoying innit?"
      "Not for me, I hadn't seen it."

    6. Re:On the bright side... by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Oh, there are quite a few people incapable of remembering anything from the entire Disco era. But of course that's nothing compared to the people who grew up in the 60's.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    7. Re:On the bright side... by Belseth · · Score: 1
      got to escape the entire disco era unscathed.

      I lived through that horror. Where do I sign up?

    8. Re:On the bright side... by Mattcelt · · Score: 1

      Aye. "The universe is my eyes and ears. Everything else is hearsay."

    9. Re:On the bright side... by Kra+Z+Joe · · Score: 0, Redundant

      ... He's been abducted by aliens.

    10. Re:On the bright side... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he's a Fark moderator who lets four dupes a day through.

    11. Re:On the bright side... by Elad+Alon · · Score: 1, Funny

      I wonder if he has registered with Slashdot, and every dupe is an exciting new post.

      --
      News for merdes. Shit that matters.
      Ask me about my sig.
    12. Re:On the bright side... by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1

      Forget the gadgets---how does he react when doctors walk in and are female? Or black?

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    13. Re:On the bright side... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He meets new people every day....
      He never gets tired of his wife's vagina
      YOu can give him the same birthday gift every year...

    14. Re:On the bright side... by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

      I never thought that Bendan Frazer's "hit" movie "Blast From the past" could actually be an important scientific work....

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    15. Re:On the bright side... by Kandenshi · · Score: 5, Informative

      The removal of his hippocampus, amygdala and bits of his temporal lobes did indeed cure his seizures. While he can hardly be said to live a "normal life" now his health is fairly good. Currently suffering from osteoporosis but that's not really a function of his surgery or his former seizures :P

      If you want to really dig into his case I'd suggest the following review paper that summarizes alot of the interesting things we've learned because of him much better than TFA does IMO:
      http://homepage.mac.com/sanagnos/corkin2002.pdf/

    16. Re:On the bright side... by thesnarky1 · · Score: 1
      Well, it said he just couldn't form new memories, so I'd guess something along the lines of...
      "Gee golly... Whatever do they have Betty Sue... Could it be--- Oh, hehe, a penny's under the bed!"
    17. Re:On the bright side... by Merdalors · · Score: 1
      I know he's a Slashdot editor: he has to re-display half the posts from the previous page, onto the next page, for he seems to have forgotten them.

      Delenda est Carthagena

      --
      Slashdot entertains. Windows pays the mortgage.
    18. Re:On the bright side... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      YOu can give him the same birthday gift every year...

      Best of all, you can take it with you when you leave.

      Him - Wow, you're giving me $10,000 cash?!?
      Me - You just mean that much to me
      --5 minutes later--
      Me - Ok, I have to go now. Oops, I almost left my big pile of cash!

      No, maybe the the best part is you can play this game every day! I bet the psychologists play this game every once in a while too. Ok, today we'll see how a 50's guy reacts when we tell him the communists took over and its now Amerika with a "k"

    19. Re:On the bright side... by shambalagoon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, just brilliant. Remove big chunks of his brain and destroy his ability to retain new memories. Let's hear it for neuroscience! This reminds me of the days when a lobotomy was believed to cure bad behavior. Much in the same way that killing someone outright would stop their bad behavior.

    20. Re:On the bright side... by AlienSlav · · Score: 1

      I LOST THREE YEARS IN A PURPLE HAZE IN THE 70's THAT I CANNOT ACCOUNT FOR. OH YEA ET CALL HOME.

      AlienSlave

    21. Re:On the bright side... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahahahah your comment about dupes got modded redundant! :P

    22. Re:On the bright side... by bhiestand · · Score: 1
      This reminds me of the days when a lobotomy was believed to cure bad behavior. Much in the same way that killing someone outright would stop their bad behavior.

      Much in the same way that circumcision was thought to reduce sexual misconduct, masutrbation, and, later, disease? Oh, wait, most of the west still believes that one, too. I think the difference, though, is that a lobotomy actually DOES cure bad behavior, we just found better ways of doing it. So maybe I'm off a bit in this post...
      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    23. Re:On the bright side... by allism · · Score: 1

      A friend's father has a problem similar to this from a car accident. TV shows aren't that interesting to him - commercials are about all he can tolerate. He can't remember anything long enough to enjoy a 30-minute show, but 30 seconds are pretty tolerable.

    24. Re:On the bright side... by Indigo · · Score: 1
      Feh. Just came across a very , informative site.

      What a jolly read.

      Of course, in these enlightened times, no one would ever let a showman with an ice pick tour the country for decades hacking up peoples' brains. Nope, we're safe now...

    25. Re:On the bright side... by PakProtector · · Score: 1
      I know he's a Slashdot editor: he has to re-display half the posts from the previous page, onto the next page, for he seems to have forgotten them.

      Delenda est Carthagena

      Illud Verbum. Dicebas. Non Cogito Dicet Quid Cogitas Dicet.

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

  2. In other news by drDugan · · Score: 5, Funny

    "BrainConnection has an interesting article about a man who lives life straight out of the movie Memento. FTA: "When twenty-seven year old Henry M. entered the ..."

    1. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Matrix?

    2. Re:In other news by Sky+Cry · · Score: 1

      "... Posted by samzenpus on Thursday January 26, @06:02AM from the can-I-leave-my-shirts-here dept. diverge_s writes ..."

    3. Re:In other news by MoogMan · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey, I must be new here!

  3. Clive Wearing... by RustNeverSleeps · · Score: 5, Informative

    This case reminded me of another case I learned about in a psychology class several years ago. There is a British man named Clive Wearing who has a similar condition caused by disease. A video of Wearing showed him greeting his wife as if for the first time in months or years, even if she had only just stepped out of the room for a minute, writing in his journal every couple minutes etc. They did say that he had some vague recollection of major events like the fall of the Berlin wall and the Soviet Union, but not much beyond that. He was also shown playing the piano very fluently, although he went into a seizure as soon as he stopped playing, supposedly because of the "shock" from the music stopping.

    1. Re:Clive Wearing... by rikkards · · Score: 1

      My wife took cognitive psych last semester and they mentioned someone who had essentially lost their short term memory so he didn't learn anything new. Well not quite that because they did an experiment where he shook the hand of the doctor but the doctor had put a thumbtack in his hand. The next day he wouldn't shake the doctors hand. The reason he gave was that he had heard from someone that there was somebody going around doing what had occured the day before. So it seems that things that stay in their head long enough skip over short term and get into long term.

    2. Re:Clive Wearing... by Threni · · Score: 2, Funny

      Imagine if everytime you loaded up a browser and went to Slashdot you saw the same story. You turn on the TV and it's still the same old shows... the same idiots in public office making the same mistakes... you still had to work too long for too little free time. You fire up your console but it's the same old games...the same music...the same movies... That must be terrible.

    3. Re:Clive Wearing... by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Um, it is... Isn't it??

    4. Re:Clive Wearing... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Funny, there was a long piece on this guy on the radio the other day and they never mentioned the seizures after he stopped. Which is significant because the spot was about how he could learn new pieces through repetition but couldn't remember learning the new pieces.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  4. A bit more about him by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Okay, I started typing this based only on the title of the /. article when it was still in the mysterious future. It looks like I'm talking about the same guy that the article is. Anyway, this guy is truly fascinating. It's good to hear that he's still alive and kicking! Here's what I typed before reading the article: I was doing video conversions (VHS->VCD) for a Pyschology professor a while back and he had this most amazing video of a man through some sort of illness had lost the ability to make new memories (a la, Memento, although this was before the release of that movie). He was happy as a clam, although kind of dazed and confused. What was interesting though, was that as he got older (the video followed him over something like twenty years), he started to adapt. I say adapt, because he wasn't making new memories, but was learning patterns. Let me explain: the nurses always came into his room hoping that he would recognize them, but of course he wouldn't, because he met them after the brain injury, but he started to pick up on that anticipation and started to fake knowing them, as best he could.

    1. Re:A bit more about him by cgenman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My grandmother is going through this exact same process, and it is interesting to watch. She has gone from thinking that she just got to her new home, to "I think I've been here a few weeks." (years, actually) She's stopped recognizing a lot of people, but she's learned to pretend to know everyone. She learned to walk over to the calendar to see if people were there yesterday, even though she doesn't recognize the calendar or know why she's going to that part of the room.

      She even learned how to sneak out and buy beer, and did so repeatedly. We were all impressed by that one. Of course, she pled innocent, and as far as she knows she was.

    2. Re:A bit more about him by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Why not just buy the beer for her?

      When I'm on my last legs, I'm pretty sure that I'm tossing the gym membership and signing up for the Cigar, Scotch, and Hamburger of the Month clubs, as well as enjoying biscuits and gravy with sunny side up eggs every morning for breakfast. All of that while gambling my money away.

      Pretty much, everything that I do in moderation now, I'll do to the degree that it will kill me by the time I'm in my 70s or 80s. What will my doctor say? "You know, smoking could knock the last 5 or 6 months off your life at the rate you're going."

    3. Re:A bit more about him by Destoo · · Score: 1

      *SIGH* some people I know wished it were true.

      What smoking and having those "bad" habits only do is make the last few years of your life miserable, not simply end it.

      What doesn't kill you, at that point, just makes life harder to live. But it all comes down to the 'tude. My cousin's grand-father lost eyesight in the middle of both eyes. He can still sorta read, drive and all that stuff. But anything in the middle of his vision is simply blank. I needed to tell him who I was for him to recognize me, just because he couldn't really see me. So he still works as a volunteer, physical work stuff. I'd really freak if I lost my eyesight. I could still type and all, and relearn with voice reading or braille, but to learn these things at 60-70? I don't think so.

      --
      Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
    4. Re:A bit more about him by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

      What is happening, at least as was explained to us psych majors, is that he can learn skills, but not facts. Those parts of the brain are apparantly seperate, which is one of the major discoveries his case has lead to. So you cannot teach him facts about a bicycle that he doesn't know, but he could learn to ride a bycicle, if he doesn't know how.

    5. Re:A bit more about him by NitsujTPU · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm not exactly talking about becoming a total libtertine. My grandmother drinks Remy Martin XO whenever she has a drink, and enjoys one almost every night.

      I wouldn't deny her it.

    6. Re:A bit more about him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      long, long time since my degree in psychology but I think motor skills (movement)are governed in the cerebellum, not the cerebral cortex where thinking and memory mostly happen.
      as i remember it, the cerebral cortex is the crinkly bit on the outside of the brain and it is also the bit of the chimpanzee brain that swelled up; the rest of the brain we have in common with our hairy, forest-dwelling cousins (99.4% shared DNA ...)

    7. Re:A bit more about him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be a crime for someone like that to still be driving.

    8. Re:A bit more about him by ultranova · · Score: 1

      She even learned how to sneak out and buy beer, and did so repeatedly.

      I think that this says something about human nature, but I'm not quite sure what ;).

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    9. Re:A bit more about him by I+Like+Pudding · · Score: 1

      It's good to hear that he's still alive and kicking!

      Not really. I'd rather be dead in such a case.

      (mods: I am being 100% serious here)

    10. Re:A bit more about him by Slashcrap · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What smoking and having those "bad" habits only do is make the last few years of your life miserable, not simply end it.

      I'm really sorry to break this to you, but the last few years of your life are likely to be miserable and painful anyway.

      I know it is very comforting to believe that you can avoid this by living healthily, but you are still going to degenerate and die. And that process is not necessarily going to be more comfortable just because you ate tofu all the time and never passed up an opportunity to whine about someone smoking a cigarette 50 feet away from you.

      If there is a God, I strongly suspect that He has a very dark sense of humour. Leading an excessively healthy life probably counts as provocation.

    11. Re:A bit more about him by Mad_Rain · · Score: 4, Informative

      I would recommend to anybody who is interested Oliver Sacks, a neurologist who wrote a great book called The Man Who Mistook His Wife For a Hat for other intriguing and amusing tales from the fringes of psychology and medicine. As I recall (eek!) it did a fair job of explaining our understanding of the brain (even as the book is 20 years old).

      --
      "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
    12. Re:A bit more about him by Threni · · Score: 1

      > As I recall (eek!) it did a fair job of explaining our understanding of the brain (even as the
      > book is 20 years old).

      I don't think it explained anything very much. (You could try "The Blank Slate" by Steven Pinker for that, or maybe his "How The Mind Works".) I enjoyed reading it though.

    13. Re:A bit more about him by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Now I wonder if it's possible for the brain to develop some kind of redundancy so that the skills area could be utilized for at least some fact retention...

    14. Re:A bit more about him by brunes69 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So basically the difference is between motor memory and other memory, correct?

      One would wonder then, if someone who was deaf had the same thing happen, how their memory would be affected? Because teaching them facts would involve using ASL, which you think would be equated with the motor memory.

    15. Re:A bit more about him by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 1

      Fascinating! If you don't mind us asking, what was the cause of your grandmother's condition?

    16. Re:A bit more about him by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      And that process is not necessarily going to be more comfortable just because you ate tofu all the time and never passed up an opportunity to whine about someone smoking a cigarette 50 feet away from you.

      I'm going to have to take exception to this statement. I personally consider tofu unhealthy due to being inedible :D (as one chinese or japenese emporer did in the past). However ETS (Environmental Tobacco Smoke) contains multiple toxic and carcinogenic substances with no known safety threshold. This means that any exposure against your will is a violation of your rights, and has a small - but accumulative - detrimental effect to your health.

      It is not "whining" to demand that our right to live healthy is respected. If you want to consume tobacco products chew them is well withing your rights since you are only affecting your health, no matter how disgusting parts of the population view it (myself included).

      The fight against cigarettes is not about "we find this disgusting get away from us" as some people attempt to frame it, but is about rights. Respect the rights of others to not be poisoned by you and they will respect your right to poison yourself, and only yourself, as you see fit.

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    17. Re:A bit more about him by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      Making the sounds of the english language is motor memory, but the meaning conveyed with strings of those sounds with appropriate pauses is factual memory

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    18. Re:A bit more about him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cerebellum is where motor coordination/skills are. That's a very different part of the brain then cerebral cortex which is where facts are stored. The physical structure of the layers of neurons are very different, as well as what the cells connect to for input/output. So sorry, no you can't get any real redundancy between those parts of the brain.

    19. Re:A bit more about him by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Equally I should have a right to not be poisoned by pollution from cars and factories, not to have 5 years or more knocked off my lifespan by working, not to have my brain rotted by listening to inane conversations on buses etc etc etc.

      Life however doesn't work like that, you're perfectly free to protect yourself from all these things by living in solitude in the countryside or by not frequenting places where people are smoking but at the end of the day if YOU don't want to inhale secondary cigarette smoke then YOU should go somewhere else. It's not exposure against your will if you have the choice to remove yourself from the exposure and choose not to do so.

    20. Re:A bit more about him by metamatic · · Score: 1
      I know it is very comforting to believe that you can avoid this by living healthily, but you are still going to degenerate and die. And that process is not necessarily going to be more comfortable just because you ate tofu all the time and never passed up an opportunity to whine about someone smoking a cigarette 50 feet away from you.

      Actually, I have a congenital heart irregularity. If I can stay healthy until old age, chances are I'll just drop dead quietly in my sleep.

      Even ignoring that, there are better and worse ways to go. Cancer is pretty damn miserable and drawn out by all accounts, whereas tofu-eating non-smokers are more likely to have a quick stroke and die rapidly after that.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    21. Re:A bit more about him by flosofl · · Score: 1

      If it's anything like *my* grandmother's - who exhibits very similar behavior (except for the beer thing) - it's most likely Senile Dementia.

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    22. Re:A bit more about him by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      Equally I should have a right to not be poisoned by pollution from cars and factories

      Yes you do, and you're attempting to create a false dilema. This is why polution laws exist. Some chemicals [most] have a safety threshold. PS: Get rid of the internal combustion engine as soon as possible.

      not to have 5 years or more knocked off my lifespan by working,

      don't know where you pulled that from

      not to have my brain rotted by listening to inane conversations on buses etc etc etc.

      wrong - you do not have that right, listening to "inane conservation" does not negatively effect you in any way that violates your rights

      Life however doesn't work like that, you're perfectly free to protect yourself from all these things by living in solitude in the countryside or by not frequenting places where people are smoking but at the end of the day if YOU don't want to inhale secondary cigarette smoke then YOU should go somewhere else. It's not exposure against your will if you have the choice to remove yourself from the exposure and choose not to do so.

      WRONG - If I have to chagne my lifestyle to accomdoate the habits of others my rights are violated. Go get an education in what the difference between "rights" and "license" are my poorly misinformen parroter of old-tired overused pathetically weak arguments.

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    23. Re:A bit more about him by z4r4thu5tr4 · · Score: 1

      Yes, HM is interesting for psych/cognitive people bc he apparently can exhibit certain proecdural learning and other kinds of highly implicit learning (he can learn to fear certain objects or people just as we can) even if he can declaratively recognize those new objects or people. On a star-tracing task, he gets better and better at it, yet insists that it is the first time he's every done it. It's startling enough of a dissassociation for us to suspect that these different types of memory are quantitiatively, and not just qualitatively distinct.

    24. Re:A bit more about him by daenris · · Score: 1

      Not exactly. The cerebellum does help to make the muscles actually move, but the movement itself is planned/controlled/generated in the motor cortex, which is a region of the cerebral cortex

    25. Re:A bit more about him by AxelBoldt · · Score: 1
      Cancer is pretty damn miserable and drawn out by all accounts, whereas tofu-eating non-smokers are more likely to have a quick stroke and die rapidly after that.

      That's incorrect. Cancer is a disease of old age; you live long enough, you are almost guaranteed to get it. So are Alzheimer's and dementia. Eating fatty foods and not exercising will usually result in heart disease and high blood pressure, and you'll die after a couple of heart attacks or strokes. Living healthily prolongs your life but often produces an uglier end. The only way out is a properly timed suicide, a nice party with friends/drugs/women/whatever you like. Plan ahead to make sure that the last minute of your life is your best minute.

    26. Re:A bit more about him by Mad_Rain · · Score: 1

      You might be right - I was reading the book as one of several "recommended" books (not "required" textboooks) for a neuropsychology class, and it was one of the ones I kept on a shelf full of neuropsychology books, thinking "this might be useful later." I'm probably attributing the whole ball of knowledge to just a little part. ;)

      --
      "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
    27. Re:A bit more about him by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      contains multiple toxic and carcinogenic substances with no known safety threshold. This means that any exposure against your will is a violation of your rights, and has a small - but accumulative - detrimental effect to your health.

      Actually, I hope that I'm not being offensive in stating this, but it means that you don't know what it does. It is altogether possible that every substance in cigarette smoke that has an unknown safety threshold is present in such amounts, especially from fifty feet, that it is below this threshold, meaning that the cigarette has no effect on you. Additionally, this would preclude the effects being cumilative. Even if the chemicals were above some threshold, one would have to demonstrate the cumilative nature of the threat.

      All of that aside, this poses a greater issue than the atomic issue of accuracy of measurements and statements (which all scientists are acutely aware of). The simple matter of understanding the need to conduct good science on such issues is at stake. One may wish to counter the claims of the tobacco industry. One may wish to disprove manufactured results favoring the industry. When doing so, it is worth observing some caution. An invalid finding on your part, that you manufacture, that helps you fight the perceived injustice of the competitor will eventually invalidate your results. How many others will reference your work as supporting evidence? It is possible that you will jeapordize the cause that you are fighting for by yielding such results.

    28. Re:A bit more about him by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      If i follow you, you have a good point. However several studies on things such as asthma point out that they have found some evidence of it being, at minimum, a respratory irritant and cause of asthma with no safety threshold.

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    29. Re:A bit more about him by Vadim+Grinshpun · · Score: 1

      I doubt that'd make a difference. Speaking (as in, repeating facts they're trying to get him to learn) also involves motor skills/memory. I don't think using a different modality would be different.

    30. Re:A bit more about him by bhiestand · · Score: 1
      Not really. I'd rather be dead in such a case.

      What?! I'd volunteer for this procedure! Every time you're with a woman, you're better and better at it, but it's your first time with her (mentally). Every time you play ping pong or something you've got this huge ego because of your natural talents when playing it your first time. I'll be it's a hell of a defense in court AND against creditors. I really can't see the down side. I mean, sure, you can't learn new facts or remember people, but YOU don't KNOW that! I'll take it!
      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    31. Re:A bit more about him by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      I have to change my lifestyle to rent porn. The video store moved it to the back of the room. YOU'RE VIOLATING MY RIGHTS!

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    32. Re:A bit more about him by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      Logical fallcies to commit logical fallcies for the win!

      False analogy to attempt to construct a straw man!

      Hint:
      A-1) you don't have a right to do business with them,
      A-2) you don't have a right not to have to travel to busiess,
      A-3) you don't have a right to not have to travel x-certain distance to do busiess
      B) they have a right to operate wherever they want with the correct zoning.

      completely different from
      A) you DO have a right to not have others expose you to toxins against you will
      with
      B) smokers introducing people to non-threshold toxins and carcinogens INTO THE AIR and thereby exposing other people to them, against their will.

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
  5. That man today... by Carpe+PM · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...is better known as Cowboy Neal.

  6. Ah, come in. Now what seems to be the matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    (Caption on the screen: 'IT'S THE MIND -- A WEEKLY MAGAZINE OF THINGS PSYCHIATRIC' Cut to montage of photographs again with captions and music. Cut to a man sitting at usual desk. He is Mr Boniface.)

    Boniface: Good evening. Tonight on 'It's the Mind', we examine the phenomenon of déjà vu. That strange feeling we sometimes get that we've lived through something before, that what is happening now has already happened. Tonight on 'It's the Mind' we examine the phenomenon of déjà vu, that strange feeling we sometimes get that we've ... (looks puzzled fir a moment) Anyway, tonight on 'It's the Mind' we examine the phenomenon of déjà vu, that strange...

    (Cut to opening title sequence with montage of psychiatric photos and the two captions and music over. Cut back to Mr Boniface at desk, shaken. Caption on screen: 'IT'S THE MIND')

    Boniface: Good evening. Tonight on 'It's the Mind' we examine the phenomenon of déjà vu, that strange feeling we someti... mes get ... that ... we've lived through something...

    (Cut to opening titles again. Back then to Boniface, now very shaken. Caption on screen: 'IT'S THE MIND')

  7. Not news... by xitshsif · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "entered the hospital in 1953 for radical brain surgery"

    If the most recent development was in 1953, is it still news?

    1. Re:Not news... by mrchaotica · · Score: 5, Funny

      It is to him!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Not news... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Don't trust anything he says.

    3. Re:Not news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If the most recent development was in 1953, is it still news?

      You have to ask this on Slashdot?

    4. Re:Not news... by silasthehobbit · · Score: 1

      Man, if I could mod you higher than a 5 I would.

      That made me spit coffee all over my monitor.

      Well done for making me laugh so hard.

      --
      silas

    5. Re:Not news... by Neurotoxic666 · · Score: 1
      If the most recent development was in 1953, is it still news?

      Well, yes. But Slashdot's editors assumed most Slashdot-readers would be too young to remember when it was first posted back in '53.

      --
      You are more than the sum of what you consume. Desire is not an occupation.
    6. Re:Not news... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Ah, the perfect Slashdot reader - never a complaint about a dupe!

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  8. Mirror, mirror by Baby+Duck · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The funniest and cruelest thing you can do to him is show him his own reflection. How would you feel if you woke up one morning and had tons of wrinkles on your face where none were before.

    --

    "Love heals scars love left." -- Henry Rollins

    1. Re:Mirror, mirror by Suhas · · Score: 1

      You, Sir, are a bastard for thinking that up before I did.

      I salute you

    2. Re:Mirror, mirror by imoou · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He would have forgotten how he felt after coming to realization that the person in the mirror is him.

    3. Re:Mirror, mirror by saden1 · · Score: 1

      I don't know, telling him his mother is dead seem crueler.

      --

      -----
      One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    4. Re:Mirror, mirror by greginnj · · Score: 3, Informative

      One of his doctors actually did this -- perhaps thinking it would help 'jar' his memory or something, not really thinking through the effect that suddenly seeing yourself old would have. HM's reaction was predictable -- 'Hey, Doc! What the hell is this??'

      Fortunately, the doctor realized his error quickly, took away the mirror, and said, 'It's complicated, but I can explain it to you. But first, come on over to the window'. After looking out the window for a bit, HM forgot why he was there, or even that he was upset.

      --
      Read the best of all of Slash: seenonslash.com
    5. Re:Mirror, mirror by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Not true. Emotional memory still usually works. He'd still be upset, but wouldn't be able to remember why.

    6. Re:Mirror, mirror by HaydnH · · Score: 5, Informative

      "The funniest and cruelest thing you can do to him is show him his own reflection. How would you feel if you woke up one morning and had tons of wrinkles on your face where none were before."

      Errr, did you read the article? He doesn't appear too bothered by the mirror thing:

      "Mainly, though, he leads a life of quiet confusion, never knowing exactly how old he is (he guesses maybe thirty and is always surprised by his reflection in the mirror) and reliving his grief over the death of his mother every time he hears about it."


      Actually he seems quite upbeat about the whole thing, the highlight of the article for me (as it looks like you probably missed it) has to be the following:

      When walking down the corridor at M.I.T. with Henry, Dr. Suzanne Corkin made the usual kind of small talk. "Do you know where you are, Henry?"

      Henry grinned. "Why, of course. I'm at M.I.T.!"

      Dr. Corkin was a bit surprised. "How do you know that?"

      Henry laughed. He pointed to a student nearby with a large M.I.T. emblazoned on his sweatshirt. "Got ya that time!" Henry said.

      Haydn.

      --
      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
    7. Re:Mirror, mirror by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Emotional memory still usually works. He'd still be upset, but wouldn't be able to remember
      > why.

      You seem very certain about that!

    8. Re:Mirror, mirror by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 0

      How would you feel if you woke up one morning and had tons of wrinkles on your face where none were before.

      When faced with this, many people simply have a hair of the dog that bit them.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    9. Re:Mirror, mirror by tverbeek · · Score: 1
      He'd still be upset, but wouldn't be able to remember why.

      This is correct. Some of it's because our emotions aren't just in our head: they're in our heart rate, adrenaline levels, etc.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    10. Re:Mirror, mirror by Tim+Doran · · Score: 2, Funny

      pfft. Happened to me this morning.

      Just how the hell did I become 35?

    11. Re:Mirror, mirror by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Just how the hell did I become 35?

      An assiduous, practiced, daily routine of not dying?

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  9. The real question is... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Funny

    WWASD?

    What would Adam Sandler do?

    1. Re:The real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adam Sandler's character in 50 First Dates was named Henry, interestingly enough.

    2. Re:The real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hoobity boobity boobity, skip-skap wip-wap lappy-scrap! hibbity-dibbity-doooOoooo!

    3. Re:The real question is... by kestasjk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Take a polaroid of Adam Sandler, write 'the brain surgeon' at the bottom, slip it in Henry M's pocket.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    4. Re:The real question is... by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1

      Take a polaroid of Adam Sandler, write 'the brain surgeon' at the bottom, slip it in Henry M's pocket.

      * scribble scribble scribble *

      "He is the one. Don't believe his lies. Kill him."

      Result! :-)

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
  10. I never considered surgery by FuturePastNow · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have epilepsy, specifically partial complex seizures of the temporal lobe. No neurosurgeon ever suggested surgery as a solution, but based on cases like this, I think I would have declined the offer had it been made. I can't imagine actually having part of my brain removed, and because everyone is different, results like this man's can never be 100% avoided.

    The brain has a fantastic ability to route around damage, but 53 years after this man's surgery, we still don't know enough about the way it works to reliably fix problems that the brain itself cannot handle.

    (Then again, my seizure episodes aren't nearly as frequent as described in the article.)

    --
    Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:I never considered surgery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I think this guy is one of the main reasons your neurosurgeons never suggested surgery...

    2. Re:I never considered surgery by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      No neurosurgeon ever suggested surgery as a solution, but based on cases like this, I think I would have declined the offer had it been made. I can't imagine actually having part of my brain removed, and because everyone is different, results like this man's can never be 100% avoided.


      The 1950s weren't exactly a proud time for neurology. The lobotomy only lost favor as a "treatment" in the 50s because of the advent of thorazine. The guy that invented the lobotomy actually won the nobel prize for medicine in 1949 for inventing the procedure. The fact that they did what is now considered butchery to this guy shouldn't be surprising, though it is really quite a sad part of the history of medicine in the US.

      --
      AccountKiller
    3. Re:I never considered surgery by bloodredsun · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Actually as someone who has just finished a PhD in Neurophysiology I feel I may be a little better placed to comment than your average /. reader

      Complex partial seizures originating in the temporal lobe have one of the best success rates in epilepsy surgery, but surgery is only offered to patients whos epilepsy is medically refractive (cannot be controlled by drugs) and affects their life in such as way that they would strongly benefit from surgery. Temporal lobe epilepsy is most often caused by mesial temporal or hippocampal sclerosis, this means that that part of the brain has become scarred and shrunk and this damage is causing the seizures. So this part of the brain supports a minimal amount of function. As your seizures are probably well controlled by drugs, you would never have been offered a surgical option.

      we still don't know enough about the way it works to reliably fix problems that the brain itself cannot handle.
      That's correct to a certain extent, but we do know a lot more and one of them is how to avoid causing the sort of condition that HM suffers.

    4. Re:I never considered surgery by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1
      Temporal lobe epilepsy is most often caused by mesial temporal or hippocampal sclerosis, this means that that part of the brain has become scarred and shrunk and this damage is causing the seizures.

      Y'know, when you think about how complex, sensitive, and fast-reacting brains must be, it's kind of remarkable how few seizures they're actually prone to. We have a hard enough time building something like a robot to be both fast-acting and stable. Do you have any information on how the brain manages to damp out such things normally?

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    5. Re:I never considered surgery by bloodredsun · · Score: 1

      Yes. A PhD called "Investigation into the pathophysiology of epilepsy by electrical stimulation of the human cortex via intracranial electrodes implanted in patients undergoing pre-operative assessment for possible epilepsy surgery" submitted to King's College London. It's still awaiting viva but it covers all this topic.

      More available is Engels CD Rom "Epilepsy: The Comprehensive Cd-Rom" is considered the gold standard for Epilepsy abd seizure information. What you want are the topics of recurrent inhibition, and temporal and spatial summation.

  11. Sorry Taco :) by dcapel · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Wait, isn't he the editor /. hired a bit back?

    --
    DYWYPI?
  12. first dates by vlad30 · · Score: 4, Funny

    he could meet this girl http://imdb.com/title/tt0343660/

    --
    Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
    1. Re:first dates by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Adam Sandler films make me wish I had short term memory loss

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  13. The question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does he use tattoos as well?

  14. Crueler still... by Errandboy+of+Doom · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think hitting over the head with a chair would be pretty cruel, because man, that would have to hurt.

    1. Re:Crueler still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if he were to meet Ballmer, at least twice, on the second and later meetings that just might happen...

  15. Experimental brain surgery by jd · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Around that time, theory was a lot more advanced than practice. For example, there was a theory around that time that stated that seizures and some forms of mental illness were caused by malformed connections between brain cells - that all you needed to do was sever the connections and let them regrow. As theories went, that wasn't too bad.


    Apparently what happened in practice is that doctors would use coat hangers or any other bits of wire they could find, and slash at the brain until the symptoms stopped.


    Arguably, though, severe brain damage (through cutting chunks out or prodding them wildly with steel rods) was probably a better fate than those in Victorian asylums, which combined all the home comforts of a Soviet-era Siberian prison camp with the theraputic properties of a medieval torture chamber. At least the victims of the medical experiments were often incapable of suffering much. (Some, just not as much.)


    Modern therapies for brain disorders are often highly dangerous, extremely toxic to the rest of the body, notorious for side-effects, often addictive, and many are poorly studied with completely unknown long-term consequences. That is many thousands of times better again than those who underwent the surgery.


    With the newer discoveries being produced through fMRI and other next-generation scanning equiptment, I fully expect the next thirty to fourty years to produce as many radical changes to neurological treatments as the past thirty to fourty have. It'll be interesting to see how things change.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Experimental brain surgery by Vellmont · · Score: 3, Interesting


      Around that time, theory was a lot more advanced than practice.


      Boy is that an understatement. There was also little in the area of medical ethics. A lot of those doctors should have gone to jail for what they did. This is the same era where insulin shock and electro-shock were standard practices for several mental illnesses. What a sick and sad time.

      --
      AccountKiller
    2. Re:Experimental brain surgery by bloodredsun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Modern therapies for brain disorders are often highly dangerous, extremely toxic to the rest of the body, notorious for side-effects, often addictive, and many are poorly studied with completely unknown long-term consequences

      And what do you base this comment on? Modern therapies are rarely dangerous (felbamate being the only modern therapy I would have said was dangerous and that is restricted), have few side effects especially compared to their action, aren't addictive, and are very intensively studied with long term effects based on the duration of their use. Surgery can also be fantastic for those with medically refractive epilepsy and with an assessment period of about 18 months can produce effects that are superior to drugs.

      I think your post is either a troll or you are really quite ignorant about epilepsy treatment. I cannot for the life of me understand why you are currently rated +3 interesting.

      Disclaimer: I don't work for any drug or surgical products companies

    3. Re:Experimental brain surgery by jeremymiles · · Score: 2, Informative

      Errmmm... electroshock therapy still is used for depression. (Although you tend to be anaesthetised first.)

      --
      GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    4. Re:Experimental brain surgery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God I never thought I'd hear that. I was a victim of this in the mid-70s. Took me 15 years to get unfucked from it.

    5. Re:Experimental brain surgery by nickos · · Score: 1

      I cannot for the life of me understand why you are currently rated +3 interesting.

      You must be new here.

    6. Re:Experimental brain surgery by user9918277462 · · Score: 2, Informative
      I think the poster was referring to psychiatric drugs in general, not epilepsy per se (which isn't really a psychiatric condition anyway).

      Drugs used to treat schizoprenia are dangerous with severe, often irreversible, side effects. Tardive dyskinesia is a symptom of permanent neurological damage caused by long term use of neuroleptics. The benzodiazepines (used to treat anxiety disorders, among other things) are addictive with a pronounced, physically dangerous withdrawl syndrome (it can actually precipitate delerium tremens). Even the relatively benign SSRI/SNRIs are starting to show unanticipated side effects that are somewhat limiting their use.

      As the previous poster said, these drugs are far better than psychosurgery, but they are far from perfect. In any event, they treat the symptoms rather than the (unknown) causes of mental illness. Hopefully that will change someday.

    7. Re:Experimental brain surgery by RabidMonkey · · Score: 1

      The thing I've never understood - how does shocking something and causing intense and long lasting pain and anguish make them better?

      To hear that they still do it ... what gains are there?

      --
      We emerge from our mother's womb an unformatted diskette; our culture formats us. - Douglas Coupland
    8. Re:Experimental brain surgery by JabberWokky · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I don't think they should have gone to jail. The vast majority were using the latest knowledge in an honest effort to help people. The alternatives, neglecting or abandoning the ill, are far more sick. Considering that's what preceded your "sick and sad time", I'd say that we're progressing... and that in 50 years, our current treatments will look terrible.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    9. Re:Experimental brain surgery by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      We do anti-epilepsy surgery all the time. It's often quite safe, quite effective and is a great option for those who have severe epilepsy that does not respond well to drugs.

      Things are a lot more precise now, and we know much better what things we SHOULDN'T cut out.

      Other successful brain lesioning surgeries include treatments for Parkinson's disease.

    10. Re:Experimental brain surgery by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      The vast majority were using the latest knowledge in an honest effort to help people.


      Uh huh. So if I take out part of your brain, while wondering "gee, I wonder if taking out this part will help him" using "the latest knowledge" (almost none) that's OK? Hooking up electrodes to someones brain, but STILL not know what the hell it does or how it works is OK? (ECT isn't exactly viewed as an ethical treatment by everyone). Experimenting on people when you really don't know if it's going to help them (or anyone) and they're not in danger if imminent death is just plain wrong. This is an era where lobotomy for just about any major psychiatric disorder was considered "state of the art". This is a shamefull period for neurology, and if people don't realize that it could easily be repeated in some other discipline.

      --
      AccountKiller
    11. Re:Experimental brain surgery by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      You're probably operating on different scales for the word 'modern.' What grandparent post said was true as recently as the late 1980s.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    12. Re:Experimental brain surgery by bloodredsun · · Score: 1

      Actually no I don't think so. Anatomically standardised temporal lobectomies have been done since the 60's and is still used today. Other surgeries such as the fantastically named Multiple SubPial Transection are however new and would not have been available, but the parent was refering to epilepsy surgery in general.

    13. Re:Experimental brain surgery by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      It's no different than putting a drug into your entire body to affect one single organ. That's pretty damn disgusting. Can you imagine the revulsion of somebody in a few years thinking about chemotherapy? Or an oral anti-depression drug that affects your entire nervous system and washes through your entire body rather than targeted at a single structure of the brain?

      Our latest knowledge is *always* "almost none" compared to the future. Right now we hack out and poison chunks of the brain to get rid of tumors, taking healthy tissue along with the bad. When it's a simple inpatient "sit under this device" event, the barbaric acts of current neurosurgery will look hellish. To the future, we are ignorant savages.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  16. Hmmm...... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The story description starts out "diverge_s writes...", but although most here will never actually follow the link and read the article, if they did they would see that the first paragraph is almost identical to diverge_s' description. So, he / she didn't really write the summary as the Slashdot blerb suggests

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Hmmm...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FTA means From the Article.

    2. Re:Hmmm...... by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      Thank God. I thought everybody was just swearing like, F*** The Article...

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  17. I'm trapped! by DARKFORCE123 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Maybe I am the one trapped in a time warp? This article is odd. Could it be April 1st already?

  18. I've read about this before by Mitaphane · · Score: 4, Informative

    I thought this story covered the term but apparently it doesn't. Anyway, the medical term for Henry's condition is called anterograde amnesia. And if it hasn't already been mentioned here, it's also the same ailment that the protagonist Leonard has in the movie Memento. And if you liked that movie I reccommend reading the short story it was based on. It's an excellent piece of prose.

  19. When my mother had a stroke... by shotgunefx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When my mother had a stroke when she was dying of cancer, a very odd thing happened.

    I rushed to the hospital, she seemed ok, but weak. We talked for hours, everything seemed fine. I still don't know what prompted me to ask the question as our converstation was pretty much normal. I asked her "Do you know you who I am?"

    She said "No, should I?". Pretty much the worst moment of my life. As it turned out, she though it was 1968 and she was in there to give birth to what would be my brother Kevin.

    Thankfully, over the next few weeks, most of it came back, but it all came back in chronological order.

    She was back to the 1980's within a few hours, but the next 12 years came back much slower. She thought I was still with my first girlfriend circa 1990, that we had our old pets. The last few years were the only thing that remained somewhat little fuzzy.

    I always thought that was very telling about the mind. Not sure exactly what it says, but it definitely says something. Maybe memory is stored tree-like. The other thing that was odd, was the closer to the present it got, the slower it came back.

    --

    -William Shatner can be neither created nor destroyed.
    1. Re:When my mother had a stroke... by Carthag · · Score: 1
      The other thing that was odd, was the closer to the present it got, the slower it came back.

      While I'm not a cognitive scientist, I am thinking that could be because earlier memories have been remembered thousands of times, and reinforced all the more during each remembrance. Newer memories haven't had that reinforcement yet, and the neural connections will be weaker. Perhaps?

    2. Re:When my mother had a stroke... by Ryvar · · Score: 1

      Almost sounds liked a journaled filesystem with the most recent records corrupt, doesn't it?

      --Ryvar

    3. Re:When my mother had a stroke... by Ryvar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes and no. This is based off my own vague memory of what was recent theory about seven years ago in our cog. sci. class, so take it with a large grain of salt: there's a background 'noise' to the brain that slowly reduces the number of synaptic connections per neuron over time, which in theory would cause you to forget things. You have to think about a topic every once in a while - or think about something stored in a neural connection in close proximity at the actual physical level (thus activating the entire localized region) - to refresh the connection and keep it intact. New connections would be fresher and further from fading, but would not be as firmly etched into the overall neuro-semantic topology as the older memories. Put differently: older memories lose details more easily but are harder to remove entirely (without rearranging the entire local topology), whereas fresher memories are more firmly attached to their details but easier to forget entirely.

      Something along those lines, at any rate.

      --Ryvar

    4. Re:When my mother had a stroke... by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      well, since i'm not a clinical psych, and don't know where such case studies can be found, i can tell you of some that i have read and have heard directly from the testing psych/medico's.

      There are cases whereby organ transplant recipients have memories of something which they have never had any contact with. There was one case where a woman who had only ever heard the term rodeo, but didn't care for horses, cowboys, etc. recieved a [gut organ, liver or kidney or ooom-bop (whatever those are)] transplant, and while she was recovering from surgery in the hospital, turned on the tv in the room and found that she knew all sorts of information about certain professional riders (not even the best known rodeo riders, just some that were good), could give all sorts of stats for those people, and all she had to hear was their name. It was apparently rather well documented, given the circumstances, and is a wonderful example of how we learn. This also gives rise to some rather interesting insights into the historic human psyche, when you consider some of the surgeries that the ancients used to perform. But I digress.

      Apparently, it is true that the whole human body is part of our storage facility, and since your mother suffered from a stroke while her body was dealing with cancer, this could definitely explain some of what was going on. It also does kinda go with your theory of the memory-treebark analogy, in that the whole is nothing without the parts, in a wierd kinda way.

      Has anyone else heard of these sorts of stories, and does anyone know where to find them? I shall venture henceforth to google journals to see what i can find, but I have no idea if I shall return.

      Anybody else know?

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    5. Re:When my mother had a stroke... by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      crap, the crux of the story, as most of you may have inferred, is that the woman's transplant donor had been a young man who was unable to participate in the rodeo, but who lived and breathed it none the less. When the followup to this incident occurred, it was discovered that some of the riders that the woman could recall the most detail on (remember, she never had heard of anything related to the sport before this), those where the individuals that the young man looked up to and favored the most.

      even preview doesn't help you catch all the mistakes, apparently

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    6. Re:When my mother had a stroke... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Funny

      The other thing that was odd, was the closer to the present it got, the slower it came back.

      That's easily explained through general relitivity. As she travelled through time her "speed" in time increased, thus leading to a temporal dialation effect, slowing her down.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    7. Re:When my mother had a stroke... by Hadlock · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      My kingdom for a mod point

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    8. Re:When my mother had a stroke... by oever · · Score: 1

      I'm highly sceptical about this story. If true, it would not only mean that information is stored outside of the brain, but also that encoding of this information follows universal rules that enable interpretation of the data in a different brain. So information on what names are, how they are written, how they are pronounced, what a rodeo rider is, this information must have some sort of universal encoding. This is very unlikely.
      At the very least you could say that the woman was able to associate sounds or images she perceived with muscle movements in her mouth. But even for that to be information that's universally readable by a random brain is very unlikely.
      Are you sure, you're not trolling?

      --
      DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
    9. Re:When my mother had a stroke... by drachenstern · · Score: 1
      please make sure you followup with my other post here, also attached to the parent.

      If I am trolling (because I have no reason to doubt the information that i am given by the aforementioned individuals, excepting widespread falsification of multiple issues by controlling organizations [always wear your tinfoil hat]), I very seriously hope that someone will correct me and tell me why my information is incorrect.

      you stated:
      If true, it would not only mean that information is stored outside of the brain, but also that encoding of this information follows universal rules that enable interpretation of the data in a different brain.
      And yes I do. but my personal opine should not be construed the same as the above reported medical cases.

      gotta go, time for class
      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    10. Re:When my mother had a stroke... by shotgunefx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While I'll give you credit for making a science joke, and a decent one, it's still kind of dickish don't you think?

      --

      -William Shatner can be neither created nor destroyed.
  20. Big bang special effects... by totoanihilation · · Score: 1

    Never mind that... I've always wondered what someone from the fifties would think when seeing "special-effects" movies like LoTR ;)
    Back then people seemed to be much more sensitive to these things than we are now...

  21. Re:Let's do the time-warp again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And always off topic.

  22. Is there a name for what *I* have? by Hosiah · · Score: 4, Interesting
    While we're all taking about memory defects...

    I've have one that's very specific, but only been a minor nuisance. I blow people's names. Especially in a work environment, where I'm constantly meeting new people. A new person will have to remind me of their name anywhere from six to twelve times before it sinks in. Some people I know for awhile, then start calling them by the wrong name for a while. Then I stop that and get back to calling them by their right name again. Most people are understanding (I have to explain myself), but some get quite offended.

    Mind you, it's the only memory defect I have. I can remember a face after meeting a person once and not seeing them for years. In conversation with a co-worker on a day-to-day basis, I can tell them what we talked about yesterday, what they were wearing last week, everything they've told me about themselves down to the most minute detail. Just not their name! But in most cases, I finally get them straight after a few months.

    I was just wondering, with all the psych buffs in here...(PS it works this way online, too. I'm more likely to remember posters by their sig, or even just by their writing style, or on other forums by their icons...I'll even place people by their ID-number before their names!)

    1. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by GloomE · · Score: 3, Funny

      Luckily I live in Australia.
      I can get away with calling everyone "mate".

    2. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by pubjames · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it is the stress of having to recall a name that makes you forget it. Happens to me - if I have to introduce people I suddenly get a complete block on their names even if I've known them for years. I don't think it is any kind of memory defect as such.

    3. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by awol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, what you have is "Couldn'tgivashitaboutyou"itis :-) Seriously though, I have/had the same issue and the real reason we can't remember peoples names is because we never really cared enough about that person to bother remembering. I am not having a go at you, but it sounds a lot like what many people have. The faces are easy because we are so deeply wired to remember them. But the name thing requires conscious effort and you probably aren't bothering.

      It takes a fairly major mind shift when you first meet people, but once done, it is really easy. I am not saying that you will never forget a name but quite apart from all the "memory techniques" that you can read about, all I am saying is by simply trying to remember the name it will make a huge difference. For me my limit is about 8, I can get introduced to 8 people and with a tiny effort should be able to remember them all for a while (weeks) even longer if I actually go and talk to them all in the next hour or so.

      --
      "The first thing to do when you find yourself in a hole is stop digging."
    4. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have some troubles with names too, as I suppose most people have. There are tricks you can try, for example building mental images of something the name suggests (John Smith -> a blacksmith hammering a bottle of Long John whisky), or connecting to someone else with the same name (so that's another George. Doesn't look like Bush, though), and so on. The sillier the better! Repeat the images or stories in your mind a few times during the first conversation with the guy (before you have the time to forget the name), and maybe later too, when you get the chance. In a group setting, prioritize. Try to learn the important players first, and deal with the others when you have time for them.

    5. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by cazzazullu · · Score: 1

      I don't have a name for what you have, but I have something similar. There are three things I canNOT remember: dates, names and jokes. History lessons were a burden, and I don't even remember my parents birthdays. It took me three weeks before I could say my girlfriends name without hard thinking and hesitation. And when someone tells me a joke, well, how hard I try I forget it the same day.

      But it does seem to get better when getting older, at least the names part. But that is more because of when I hear someone's name for the first time now, I know I easily forget it, and I will start repeating it over and over to myself the next minutes. Although I still forgot about 4 out of 5 names an hour later, at least sometimes I am able to remember them.

      Strangely enough other things, like scientific trivia, I only need to hear once and I will never forget them.

      --
      int main(void) {while(1) fork(); return 0;}
    6. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by aug24 · · Score: 4, Informative
      Me too. It's called Anomia

      Curable/copable for most people using mnemonics. I can do a few people at a time now, by imagining them in a hug with someone else with the same name. I hold the pictures better than the words. Still can't cope in a new contract when I have ten people to remember: I won't be able to hold any of them.

      Only works for first names, and only names I've come across before, so not a perfect solution!

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    7. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by graibeard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No psych buff here but I remember reading that the association for names is stored in a different place, a more recent area that lives outside the hippocampus (primitive or early brain), probably because language skills came later on the evolution cycle. You can remember the aftershave/perfume they wear, mental image of their features and the way they walk, habits etc. because they are more closely linked to the hippocampus. Think early man and what he needed to know to survive, that's at the core and readily accessed, everything else was shuffled to the back.

      So, I don't know if there is a name for it but I think it's just normal, everyone has it to a certain degree.
    8. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by evrybodygonsurfin · · Score: 1

      Same here



      When I meet someone at work, if I'm at my desk at least, I pop open a term and as they walk away I type out their name five or six times while looking at them. Works for me.

    9. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      I also suffer from this, I never bother listening to people names when they're introduced since I think if I ever need to know there name I'll be able to find out when I need it. Right now I've been working in the same office for around 8 months and still don't know the names of dozens of people I've been introduced to simply because I've never had any cause to talk to them.

    10. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by CmdrGravy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can't remember jokes either, no matter how hard I try to they all turn into the only joke I do know which is:

      What do you call a three legged donkey ?
      A wonky.

    11. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by Aceticon · · Score: 1

      I have the same problem - i tend to forget somebody's name in about 5 seconds after the first time i've heard it and i need a couple of interactions before i can memorize the name (less for pretty girls ;))

      Interestingly enough my memory for just about everything else is very good.

      I've mostly solved the problem by the simple expedient of calling everybody "You there" :)))

    12. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by Alioth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that is entirely normal for a human, actually. The only people I know who remember names on 'first contact' are marketing/sales types (and I think their trick is to just use mnemonics or other memory jogging tricks).

    13. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by drfireman · · Score: 1

      Anomia is the inability to name things in general, not just people. People with anomia have a hard time naming objects you show them, even though they know how to use them. Sometimes it's very pervasive, sometimes it's limited to a few things. I don't know that it's ever limited to people, although there's a separate deficit caused by inability to recognize faces visually. Pure anomics don't always have damage to the medial temporal lobes, and if you want to characterize it as a form of amnesia (which is an apt informal description, but not how neuropsychologists think about it), it would have a big retrograde component in the sense that anomics have trouble with names they learned before (and after) their injuries.

    14. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by lju · · Score: 1

      Yes, there is a name for it... but I forgot what it was. (I have a similar problem, but I tend to remember after a few times meeting them.)

    15. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Excuse me for veering off a little, but there's a question I keep asking people (and myself).

      Is "holding pictures" meant to be metaphorical in any way? Until recently I thought "I can see it in my mind" was just a flowery way of saying "I am familiar with it". I'm quite blind inside in most mundane states of consciousness - couldn't even visualize a circle, much less whatever happy places people purport to see in meditations. Yet I could probably describe or draw familiar faces or objects as well as or better than the average non-artist.

      This is frustrating - it's like I'm imagination-impaired. Daydreaming means thoughts, feelings, concepts, dialogue - words, above all... not that there's anything wrong with it, but something more sensual would be nice every now and then. Same with books (or text adventures)... it's work to get anything other than "noise" out of the descriptions. And I rarely understand where the characters are.

      Visual memory's similarly bad. Never ask me for directions; geography's just a jumbled mess of very faint impressions to me with precious few links between them. And reading "fixed" maps - forget about it. They never point in the right direction.

      On the other hand, spelling's never been a serious problem for me.

      So. Do you people actually see things in your heads? Can you picture a face/scene/object/symbol - and really look at it?

    16. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      has anyone ever tried messing with you? Like giving you a different name every time you ask?

    17. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been dealing with this for several years now and while it's always names, voices, and faces, I do on occasion go to that cold thing and get out some leftover whatsit for dinner. It's frustrating to no end, though I've learned to cope some by changing my speech patterns to not try to refer to people by name and forming relationships based on context. College was bad, living in a dorm, my roommate was the guy who was in the room with me. Once, I came in and there was some guy sitting at my roommate's computer, and I just assumed he was my roommate, it wasn't until about half an hour later he said "oh, I hope you don't mind me being here, I'm hiding from my roommate for sticking porn on his desktop while his family was here". Still have no idea who he was, but I figured it was a good cause ;)

      When I came home from college, my aunt was staying with my parents, breaking my "mother is the older woman who lives here" relationship. I figure if I ever manage to get a girlfriend, I'll have to write down her name and have it tattooed on my wrist, so I can just glance at it when I need to know. Then i just have to hope her sister never visits ;)

    18. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by aug24 · · Score: 2, Informative
      I certainly do. When I am on the train to work, planning DIY in the evening, say, then I will work around the room in my head, planning what order I will do things in, and I can see the whole room from any angle. I'm doing it now, just to check!

      Shit, I just thought: how do you do, shall we say, relief?

      Don't answer that, OK ;-)

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    19. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by skryche · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thanks for the tip, J-- Jake? James?

    20. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by aug24 · · Score: 1

      I should have said: I frequently can't remember names of things either. There was once an occasion when I was describing driving in the rain, and I had to describe the things that were worn out as "those things that wipe the windscreen". Laughing hugely, my landlady guessed "windscreen wipers?".

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    21. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My mind works a bit like yours. For example, I don't dream/daydream in images or motion, it's all "thoughts, feelings and concepts". On a few occasions I've tried describing it to friends, but they have no idea what I'm talking about. So yes, I think they do see things in their minds.

    22. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by tverbeek · · Score: 1
      Do you people actually see things in your heads? Can you picture a face/scene/object/symbol - and really look at it?

      It isn't as clear or vivid as seeing something "live" (more like an SLP VHS recording of an off-the-air broadcast on pause) but yes, I can picture things I've seen frequently. Similarly, I can play an audio recording back in my head, not just reciting the lyrics and melody, but actually hearing the whole orchestra playing the opening theme to Superman. Unfortunately, it only works for music I've heard repeatedly and it's hard to do with distracting noises, so I still had to buy myself an iPod.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    23. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by tverbeek · · Score: 1
      i need a couple of interactions before i can memorize the name (less for pretty girls ;))

      I tend to have difficulty with women's names more than men's. I figure the fact that I'm less attracted to them has got to be part of the reason.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    24. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by digidave · · Score: 1

      I think small memory problems are extremely common, but not often talked about. I happen to have very poor short term memory and selective long-term memory.

      When someone calls for my wife and she isn't home there is almost zero chance I will remember to give her the message, though I sometimes remember a few days later.

      I'll often be reading an article on the Net and see a term I want to look up, but by the time I open Wikipedia or Google I can't remember what that term was so I have to go back and read it again, at which point I clearly remember what it was.

      I'm also poor with names, but great with faces. I can know somebody for years, but if I don't see them for a couple of years there is a great chance I won't remember their name. I recognize faces in shopping malls or out on the street all the time, but I'm afraid to approach someone whose name I cannot remember.

      I often forget tasks at work, but I manage well enough to hold down a great job thanks to a thousand post-it notes and to-do lists. I can also remember passwords very well, including randomly generated passwords from ten years ago. My brain is filled with IPs and passwords for countless servers I don't even manage anymore.

      But we either have to learn to live with our problems or fail miserably in life. The amazing thing about the human brain is that it will almost always find a way to compensate for its deficiencies.

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    25. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by MrScience · · Score: 1

      I suffer from this as well. When I first met my wife-to-be in an office setting, I had to keep referring to the name on her door. After two weeks, she took it down in frustration, forcing me to figure out a mnemonic.

      Anomia is apparently a generic loss of naming capability (a match isn't "match," it is "that which makes fire"). Prosopanomia is the proper-name-specific version, and has apparently been pinpointed.

      I never thought that there might be a name for this condition. I've always had to just live with it, and thought it was this hard for everyone (except those crazy memory gurus).

      --

      You quitting proves that the karma kap worked. The most annoying of the whores shut up. --CmdrTaco

    26. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I too have some kind of specialised amnesia like yours, but I just can't remember what it concerns. :(

    27. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by hobbesx · · Score: 1

      A wonky
      I'm gonna fix that last joke by taking out all the words and adding new ones.
      --Mitch Hedberg

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    28. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by Hosiah · · Score: 1
      But the name thing requires conscious effort and you probably aren't bothering.

      You sound like exactly one of those people who would get outrageously offended about me. If what you say were at all true, why can I remember Jill's favorite color, what kind of pets she likes (judging by the cat calandar on the wall of her cubicle), remember to ask about her sick aunt in New Zealand which she mentioned once last week, what she had on her enchilada at lunch (she likes guacamole and salsa, but no sour cream), and so on ad infinitum? I mean even trivia I could care less about, even about people I actively don't like! But I've met 1,000,000 Jills before, and that name's gonna get lost in the file with the other Jills, Janes, Jans, and Joans.

    29. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by Hosiah · · Score: 1
      So. Do you people actually see things in your heads? Can you picture a face/scene/object/symbol - and really look at it?

      Absolutely. Richard Feynmann once covered this in one of his biographies. He described the difficulty he had in tracking seconds without looking at a clock while he was carrying on a conversation. An acquaintence demonstrated that he had no such problem. On comparing notes, he discovered that his acquaintence counted by visualizing a tape rolling in his mind with the numbers written on them, where Feynmann had to have his mental voice "saying" the numbers to him in his mind. So when he was talking, the "speech" part in his brain got distracted...

      Yes, I can literally picture things in my head like I had a video cassette player in there! I often remember events like they were little movies. I even figure math problems by picturing a matrix in my mind! Golden ratios, fibonacci sequences, the number pi, cube roots...they all have pictures associated with them for me. I guess that's why I have an art blog. Fractals come so natural to me, it's disgusting.

      This goes right back to how I navigate in the world, as well. *Street* names are another sticky spot with me, yet I'm one of those people who never gets lost. I can't tell you the name of the street, but I can describe every landmark around there...so once I've been somewhere, I find my way back by "replaying" the mental video of how I got there the first time.

    30. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      So. Do you people actually see things in your heads? Can you picture a face/scene/object/symbol - and really look at it?

      Yes, and this is normally how I describe it to people, that I can do this in multiple frames, if you will, in my head, such that I can visualize multiple seperate items, scenes, or combinations in my head at one time.

      My father once remarked, well, everybody does that, to which I replied, but in full motion, full color, with a hint of sound, all on two or three fronts at a time? Yes was the answer I recieved, although I doubted it then, and still do.

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    31. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by awol · · Score: 1

      You sound like exactly one of those people who would get outrageously offended about me.

      On the contrary, I draw no offence from this one way or the other, just that when most people cant remember a name its not becaue it is inherently hard but because they dont try

      --
      "The first thing to do when you find yourself in a hole is stop digging."
    32. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      Heh. I suppose I did provoke that question... the answer would be more or less the same as for "daydreaming", of course.

    33. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by wayland · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's called being an auditory-type person. NLP (neuro-linguistic programming) talks a lot about whether people are visual, auditory, or kinaesthetic people. Apparently it's possible to learn how to visualise things. I read about it once somewhere. I can't remember where, but if I had to guess, I'd guess either:
      i) Frogs into Princes (Richard Bandler)
      ii) Win Wegner's image-streaming stuff (available on the web); I'm not sure which one of these, if it was one, though

    34. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by strikethree · · Score: 1

      I have read the tons of replies that you have received regarding this post so I won't cover anything that has already been discussed other than to say: Me too (as far as names go) but it applies to me less often concerning objects.

      What I am going to add is that if I stop trying and just totaly uncensor myself, I can get a name right by "guessing" most of the time. Very weird. I can also "guess" the time accurately to within a minute even after hours of not looking at a clock. It seems as if my brain has its own life and I just merely think I am in control of it. Thankfully, it allows me to use it every now and then. :)

      strike

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    35. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My father once remarked, well, everybody does that, to which I replied, but in full motion, full color, with a hint of sound, all on two or three fronts at a time? Yes was the answer I recieved, although I doubted it then, and still do.

      well, he is related to you!

      GrimRC
    36. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by ndinsil · · Score: 1

      It's interesting to read the discussion here. I've always had difficulty with names, not just people's, but all the dynamic small bits of memories like technical terms and schedules. One time it became exaggeratedly bad: I was running a 10 k road race and unknowingly got very dehydrated. I finished the race, but started going into shock. While the medics were treating me I couldn't speak at all. I could make sounds, and think without words, but there were no words in my mind at all. Although I could understand when they spoke to me without any problem. After time, I could concentrate hard for a few seconds and spit out a complete sentence. But I wasn't aware of what I was concentrating on, or where the sentence came from. After one got out, I'd have to re-concentrate to build up the next sentence. As I recovered, the time it took became progressively less until I returned to normal.

      But a recent experience has been enlightening. For this and other issues, I was diagnosed a couple years ago with ADD. About a month ago I started taking Straterra, and as it's developed in my system I've felt my "dynamic" memory get better. By which I mean at the time I'm making the memory I can feel it's being stored better, and I'll be able to recall it more reliably. I had no idea a person could even sense such a thing. I don't really know what's going on in the noggin with experiences like these, but it's kind of fun nevertheless to witness some of the specific weirdnesses of the mind first-hand.

    37. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by c4ffeine · · Score: 1

      Horrifically offtopic, but why not. I'd have to say that, yes, it appears to be common to be able to build mental images. However, I have the odd problem that they're not internally consistent and that I can't focus on them- if I have an image in my mind, I can only hold on to it if I don't concentrate on it. Otherwise, it sorta slips away. It's hard to explain, but I'm sure someone else here will recognize it. Any takers?

      This doesn't really answer your question, so I'll just say that "holding pictures" is technically accurate, but not that great.

      --
      "73% of quotes on the Internet are made up" -Ben Franklin
    38. Re:Is there a name for what *I* have? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Similarly, I can play an audio recording back in my head, not just reciting the lyrics and melody, but actually hearing the whole orchestra playing the opening theme to Superman.

      Good example. Damn, that big cymbal is just perfect, isn't it?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  23. No it doesnt sound stupid by drachenstern · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am the same way, and by way of ref, I was "diagnosed" ADD/ADHD in the late 80's/early 90's (you seriously expect ME to remember when, yeah right, read the first part of the sentence again). I have since spent a lot of time talking to some very knowledgeable (think genius and add some on top) Psychs (both varieties) and have come to the conclusion (which they sometimes acknowledge is a reasonable belief, since so little seems to be known about this "disease" (phhht)) that ADD/ADHD is not a impairment in the way that the mind makes connections with data, but in how much data the mind is anticipating. Kinda like revving your engine and dropping into second, sometimes you're where you need to be to make that happen, sometimes your not. ADD/ADHD people sometimes seem like everyday normal people, and sometimes we're all over the place, and sometimes we're about to fall apart on ya.

    But back to you're post, yeah, you're not the only one. I CANNOT seem to get a person's name for anything, but I can do the face/item trick just as well. One of my prof's, double doctorate, retired from TWO psy institutions had a very simple trick for learning names, and he taught it to every one of his classes, psy or otherwise during the first few days of class. Use ONE (no more and no less) phrase everytime you meet someone, and you're brain starts to pick up on when you meet someone, you learn their name. Trust my words, he could pick up any name he could say like this. Most students in my classes could too! (I think my ADD/ADHD/Whatever kept me from being able to do this as quickly as most, but it works. He had us say something to the effect of (but use what works for you):

    Hello, my name is ______, and your name is? (wait for answer) Nice to meet you _______.

    Keep in mind, we were doing an in class exercise whereby we had to do this over and over with our classmates, but since, it has helped that part of my mind alot, and yes, it does sound really cliche. Please ignore that part, just trust that it REALLY does WORK.

    my $.02, have questions, just ask

    --
    2^3 * 31 * 647
  24. 50 First Dates by mwvdlee · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This sounds more like "50 First Dates" then "Memento".

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  25. Lucky guy ... by didit · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... he'll never notice slashdot dupes.

  26. His personality by cartel · · Score: 1

    I wonder to what degree this has affected his personality.

  27. Nice: 43 Years Later Slashdot's Still got the edge by Hack+Jandy · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is older than internet and I combined. Did someone just take Psychology 100 recently?

    HJ

  28. More importantly by Leffe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did the operation cure the epilepsy?

    1. Re:More importantly by bloodredsun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I believe it did. He was thought to have bilateral temporal lobe eiplepsy, the removal of which cured or at least reduced his seizures markedly but left him with severve anterograde amnesia.

  29. I had this problem... by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 4, Interesting
    ... after a head injury, I was unable to form new memories. That mechanism was not working. I was totally conscious and talking to people, and yet from my perspective I didn't even exist. It is NOT like the movie Memento, because its simply impossible to have any self-awareness of your condition.

    For the weeks that I was like this, I was essentially dead. I was lucky enough that for me it was temporary, though I still have some problems, but even if I weren't already an atheist it would have been total confirmation that there is no afterlife, because with that small part of my brain not working I was literally no longer a person, I didn't exist as a mind - I was just some pile of animated meat.

    The process of regaining the memory "stickiness" was strange - that time feels like my birth.

    --
    This space available.
    1. Re:I had this problem... by javaDragon · · Score: 1

      Can you elaborate about the process of regaining your long term memory ? How did it happen ?

      Also, is there now a kind of "gap" (or several "gaps") in your memories of that period ?

      --
      -- javaDragon is an instance of JavaDragon.
    2. Re:I had this problem... by Majikk · · Score: 1

      The part that confuses me is that you can recall this at all. I thought you weren't making new memories. If you remember this, then it sounds like you simply weren't reading the memories you'd made.

    3. Re:I had this problem... by barawn · · Score: 1

      because with that small part of my brain not working I was literally no longer a person, I didn't exist as a mind - I was just some pile of animated meat.

      Hate to comment on this, but if you were a person during that portion, how would you know? You couldn't remember it.

    4. Re:I had this problem... by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I was not making new memories, so while I was conscious and talking and interacting with people for weeks, to me it is a complete blank, and was at the time. I only know about it from what they told me in the days following my recovery.

      When the "mechanism" for storing memories started to work again, I kind of faded back into existence in snippets lasting a few seconds here and there - but of course in a sense it only FEELS like that remembering back on it, the actual experience at those very moments must have been something different.

      In essence, there is no memory of weeks, then there are segments here and there that stuck, and then finally continutity.

      --
      This space available.
    5. Re:I had this problem... by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1
      The process of storing memories simply came back after a couple of weeks, I gather that this is not uncommon with head injury. The process of going from no memory creation to reasonably full memory creation apparently took place over a period of perhaps 2 or three days (or so it seems to me anyway).

      There is simply a blank space, no memories whatsoever from shortly before the accident until weeks later, with a few little flashes and snippets that stored in the last day or so during my transition back to normal memory storage.

      --
      This space available.
    6. Re:I had this problem... by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The point is, I was interacting and speaking with people, but if they stepped out of my vision and then back in, then it was as if I was seeing them again for the first time. This, of course, is all from what I have been told by the people that were interacting with me at the time.

      The point being that without that continuity, without the ability to remember from one moment to the next - without that continuing thread, the subjective experience of the person lacking this function is of nothingness. You could argue that my responses to people (as non-sensical as they were) were just programmed responses.

      Bottom line is, whether or not you can argue that a person exists or not is kind of beside the point - if they are unable to experience their own existence, then to them they don't exist... and if this mechanism is necessary for an individual to be able to experience their own existence, then after death, when this mechanism surely ceases functioning just as it would with injury, the experience of the dead person would be the same - nothingness. From my perspective at the time (or rather complete lack of one), I did not exist - and when it comes to being alive or being dead, the perspective of the person concerned is the only one that matters.

      --
      This space available.
    7. Re:I had this problem... by tverbeek · · Score: 1
      You could argue that my responses to people (as non-sensical as they were) were just programmed responses.

      And how exactly is that different from a person with full cognitive function? We're all arguably just meat-based computers whose actions are based on our construction and programming (nature + nurture).

      Ask a person with no short-term memory if they are a person, if they exist, if they're alive... however you want to phrase it, and they will respond affirmatively. Probably pretty emphatically. I've never been in that condition myself (and arguably, neither have you, since you don't remember it), but I've seen someone in much the same condition, and to me he's very much alive, and very much the person he was before. And I think that perspective also matters.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    8. Re:I had this problem... by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 2, Interesting
      My family interacted with me, and I'm sure it mattered to them, but it was simply impossible for it to matter to me.
      Its not something you will be able to comprehend. Its not just not remembering a two week period in my life... we ALL have that. It was not remembering at this moment that I existed a moment ago, and that I will exist a moment from now. I just can't explain it to someone who hasn't experienced it. Being in that state could not be felt, but coming gradually OUT of that state could be felt, and so I was immediately aware of the difference.

      I'm not saying to give up on your friend.

      And yes, we are all meat-based computers, but the key difference is that computers are able to use variables - a computer can store a new value for a variable and thus change its state.
      I couldn't. With no changes in state, time stops. Consciousness in the sense of self-awareness is a thread... a line. I had no line. I was a line segment.

      --
      This space available.
    9. Re:I had this problem... by barawn · · Score: 1

      if they are unable to experience their own existence, then to them they don't exist...

      But they are experiencing it. They're just not remembering it. Remembering things allows you to have control over your own experience, but it's not what provides the experience.

      You could argue that my responses to people (as non-sensical as they were) were just programmed responses.

      A person who experiences complete retrograde amnesia could claim the same thing when seeing film of himself before an incident. It's just lack of memory, not lack of being.

      Not to bring up philosophy, of course, as they didn't exactly have the same context as we're describing, but Descartes was right when he said "I think; therefore, I am" - not, "I remember; therefore, I am."

      Of course, it's also important to realize that determining "being" is completely impossible. I don't know that anyone else on the planet is conscious - I just presuppose that they are. I know I am, and I know that I still existed even while I was asleep, even though I don't remember it. But I have no way of proving that, of course. I could've been created out of the blue this morning, with the memories I have. So you have to reason "I am now; therefore it is logical that I am the me that was before, and I am the me that will be."

      when this mechanism surely ceases functioning just as it would with injury, the experience of the dead person would be the same - nothingness.

      I can't see how you can argue that. Your memory isn't who you are - it can be faked, manipulated, damaged, or destroyed. But the important thing about living isn't being able to remember. It's being able to choose. And given that we have no idea where that mechanism comes from, it's impossible to say what happens to it after death.

    10. Re:I had this problem... by QuestorTapes · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but it seems to me as if your logic is circular.

      > The point being that without that continuity, without the ability to remember
      > from one moment to the next - without that continuing thread, the subjective
      > experience of the person lacking this function is of nothingness.

      How is this lack of experience substantially different from the lack of understanding or continuity perceived by someone in a coma? They still exist, even though they aren't consciously aware.

      > You could argue that my responses to people (as non-sensical as they were)
      > were just programmed responses.

      You could certainly argue that they were reflexive, just as a coma patient squeezing the hand of someone in response to stimulus is essentially reflexive.

      > Bottom line is, whether or not you can argue that a person exists or not is
      > kind of beside the point - if they are unable to experience their own
      > existence, then to them they don't exist

      Here's where the logic seems to turn in a circle. "My life here is all there is, my awareness of this physical reality is all there is, If I lose this I cease to exist." I am a meat puppet, therefore I am a meat puppet.

      > and if this mechanism is necessary for an individual to be able to
      > experience their own existence, then after death, when this mechanism surely
      > ceases functioning just as it would with injury, the experience of the dead
      > person would be the same - nothingness. From my perspective at the time (or
      > rather complete lack of one), I did not exist - and when it comes to being
      > alive or being dead, the perspective of the person concerned is the only one
      > that matters.

      Seems like a tight circle.

      "I am my consciousness, and nothing more. Since I believe that when I die, my consciousness ceases abruptly rather than continuing elsewhere, then since my conscious awareness ceased though my body continued, I was dead. Since I didn't go to heaven or hell, the soul isn't immortal."

      If, however, you don't start with the assumption that you am nothing more than your conscious awareness, then your awareness ceasing or being drastically reduced is not essential to the question of your actual life and death.

      > From my perspective at the time (or rather complete lack of one), I did
      > not exist - and when it comes to being alive or being dead, the
      > perspective of the person concerned is the only one that matters.

      Assuming there is no God, and the soul is not real and immortal.

      If the soul is real, then when it comes to being alive or dead, there is an -actual- (albeit intangible) criteria for being alive or being dead. If there is a God, then there is another perspective than that of the person himself. If God exists, his perspective on whether you are alive or dead seems rather important.

      Before replying, please note that I am not saying I just proved God exists and the soul is immortal. I'm just saying your logic seems flawed to me. It doesn't prove anything; it just reinforces an emotional perception you had going into this.

      Thanks for your comments. For reference, I am a practicing Catholic.

    11. Re:I had this problem... by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
      I think "point" would work better than "line segment".

      And I think you would enjoy reading Flatland (moreso than Sphereland).

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  30. Human Experiments by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

    But this research is OK because it is completely distinct from "bad" human experiments right? I mean, the end justifies the means here right? We're getting valuable data and all it cost was the long term memory of one solitary man.

    Hooray for progress!

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:Human Experiments by kaiidth · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure they did it on purpose :)

    2. Re:Human Experiments by bloodredsun · · Score: 1

      So you think that intention doesn't matter? The idea was to cure this persons dibilatating epilepsy, not investigate the function of the anterior hippocampus. It was an experimental procedure as his epilepsy was life-threateningly bad. Check SUDEP in google.

    3. Re:Human Experiments by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      The idea was to cure this persons dibilatating epilepsy, not investigate the function of the anterior hippocampus.

      The original operation involved cutting out large sections of this persions temporal lobes. I'm reasonably sure that this procedure would fall under the "experimental" heading as I doubt it would become an accepted practice once the results had been observed.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    4. Re:Human Experiments by bloodredsun · · Score: 1

      The original operation was a bilateral anterior temporal lobectomy. The patients subsequent anterograde amnesia was the result of both hippocampi being removed. Further tests, using anaesthetic not surgery, revealed that amnesia did not occur as long as one hippocampus could support memory function. Unilateral anterior temporal lobectomies were the result and are now the commonest surgical treatment for epilepsy and are very much accepted practice.

    5. Re:Human Experiments by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      So the surgury was experimental. Probably highly so. Admittedly the botched results led to the development of an acceptable treatment for epilepsy, but does this make the inital experiment ethical?

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    6. Re:Human Experiments by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      Patients sign up all the time for experimental procedures using new techniques or new drugs. Sometimes the risks are known to be low, othertimes they are known to be extremely high (possibly fatal).

      As long as the patient (or if the patient is a minor, the parents) know the possible risks and both they and the doctor conclude that the condition is serious enough to warrent the risks, yes, it is certainly ethical.

      If you read the article, you know that his condition was continually worsening. He was having ~11 grand mal seizures a week. He couldn't hold a job and it didn't look like he could go on living independently. His future looked very bleak and there weren't any other effective treatments. He and his parents and the doctor all agreed that the risky treatment was a viable option and went with it. This isn't Natzi Germany where perfectly healthy people were subjected to experiments just to find out the limits of the human body. This was an attempt to cure someone of a real medical problem that was destroying their life.

    7. Re:Human Experiments by tverbeek · · Score: 1
      all it cost was the long term memory of one solitary man.

      Actually his long-term memory (everything that had happened to him before the surgery) was unaffected. It was his short-term memory (and with it the ability to form new memories) that was log.

      If you're going to criticise something, make sure you understand it well enough to get the facts right.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    8. Re:Human Experiments by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Nope. His short term memory is fine. He has no effective long term memory capacity. He only remembers long term what he had remembered for the long term before the operation.

      His short term is a-OK. His long term is where the problem is.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    9. Re:Human Experiments by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Nope, you misunderstand the terminology. "Long-term memory" is where a person's memories of things that happened more than a few minutes ago are stored. He does remember his life before the surgery, so his long-term memory is intact. "Short-term memory" is for the memory of things that happened just in the last few minutes. He doesn't remember those things, which is why those memories never make their way into his long-term memory. Think of it this way: his write-cache in RAM keeps getting wiped before the data gets written to disk. That's not a failure of his disk (from which he can read data just fine); it's a failure of a segment of his RAM.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    10. Re:Human Experiments by CrankyOldBastard · · Score: 1
      Let me assure you that there's plenty of people that would sign up at the drop of a hat for experimental surgery if there was reason to believe there was any chance of improvement. I have Chronic Pain in my right shoulder, and all the Orthopeadic Surgeons and Pain Specialists are in agreement that at this time there's nothing medicine can do except possibly make it worse, or maybe not make it worse but destroy the movement I have left, yet without helping with the pain.

      I'd seriously consider anytyhing with a better than 15% chance of improvement (as there's a better than 85% chance that anything "traditional" they could try would make things worse!).

      It was incredibly disappointing discovering that the Korean Stem Cell research was faked, as all the experts thought that was where my cure would lie somewhere in the next 8 years.

  31. Isn't that a new IBM product? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WWASD is bound to be taken for something

  32. Okay, the followup articles . . . by drachenstern · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This article talks about "What was most striking were the numerous reports of organ transplant recipients who later experienced changes in personality traits, tastes for food, music, activities and even sexual preference. Is it possible that our memories reside deep inside our bodily cells in addition to in our minds?" and was written by Leslie A. Takeuchi, BA, PTA

    This article talks about "In the 19th century a German anatomist Leopold Auerbach observed a complex network of nerve cells in the human digestive tract. And now scientists in the US and Germany are claiming to have rediscovered this so called 'second brain' which is made up of a knot of brain nerves in the digestive tract and is believed to involve around 100 billion nerve cells - more than those held in the spinal cord." and is really just a blurb but quite interesting food for thought. It comes from the Discovery Channel's website, since they do a lot of Health programming. (no puns intended, thanks, altho it is quite funny)

    This article is a BB set of posts that is probably how most front page slashdotters would react to this topic, but it does have some insightful information, like this quote from halfway down the page
    Let's see...whenever we've done tests with memory, the brain seems to be involved. The simplest example is that you can't remember anything if you've had your brain removed. More complex examples would be fMRI scans which show that different regions of the brain are active when you're doing different mental tasks, including the formation and recall of memories. You could say, "But that's just because the brain is interacting with the mystical unknown in ways which look like it's actually doing something!", but I'll Occam that argument: We have no evidence for non-physical things interacting with the physical realm, so when we see activity in the brain corresponding to activity in the "mind," we should assume that the brain is the location of the mind, not that the brain is some sort of mysterious conduit that we can't understand. If you've got some sort of experiment which would differentiate between these two views, I would be interested in hearing about it.

    Also, your memory of the flavor of Pepsi is stored in the way that the neurons in your brain are connected to one another. I'll agree that we don't know exactly how memories work, but that doesn't mean that we know nothing of how memories work, and we should work with what knowledge we have rather than decide that understanding is an all-or-nothing process.
    Which leads me to my belief that the organs DO almost all the work of memory, but it is the brain that stitches all that information back together, as well as some information storage of it's own. Does the fact that all information travel via the nerve clusters as electronic impulses that originate and return to the brain have anything to do with the electrical firing that MRI's and the like pick up? More and more I think this is really the case (If you are a medico student and want a thesis, use this, please, if you have seen papers published on this topic, please let me know!!!)
    --
    2^3 * 31 * 647
    1. Re:Okay, the followup articles . . . by F_Scentura · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a lot of correlation, not causation. I wouldn't suggest putting too much faith on the Discovery channel's information, they've been more about entertainment than proper science as of late. That's not to say that I'm absolutely sure that this topic is bunk & pseudoscience, but the articles aren't convincing on their own.

    2. Re:Okay, the followup articles . . . by swillden · · Score: 1

      This article [...] was written by Leslie A Takeuchi, BA, PTA

      Do you know what "BA" and "PTA" stand for here? BA is "Bachelor of Arts", which as everyone knows is basically the modern high school diploma. PTA is "Physical Therapy Assistant". Takeuchi has no credibility.

      However, Takeuchi doesn't claim to have observed the described phenomena peronally. Rather she (he?) is just reporting on the work of others, namely Paul Pearsall, Gary Schwartz and Linda Russek. Pearsall wrote "The Heart's Code". From the Booklist review:

      Psychologist Pearsall had a personal experience with "energy cardiology" when he had hip cancer. His logical, directing brain struggled over his disease and what it meant to him with his sensitive, more accepting heart. He began to study the heart and learned about its "L energy" and how to recognize its warnings. He went on to study heart transplants and how the background of a new heart could affect its recipient; for example, one man began to yearn for spicy foods and to study Spanish before he knew that his donor had been Hispanic.

      Okay, so he's a Psychologist, not an MD, much less a medical researcher, and his book is from a popular, not scientific, publisher.

      What about Gary Schwartz? According to Takeuchi, he and Russek co-wrote "The Living Energy Universe". Regarding that book, one reviewer on Amazon.com said:

      That may well be how the universe works, but this book fails to prove it. Instead, the authors present a muddled, heartfelt, personal `proof' consisting of questionable assumptions, faulty logic, confusion of categories and much wishful thinking. I stopped reading about three-fourths of the way through the book, after one too many of the authors' leaps from questionable assumptions to incredibly sweeping - and incredible - conclusions.

      Schwartz is a professor of psychology, though he claims interest in psychiatry, neurology and surgery. His main interest, however, seems to be the afterlife. He's written a lot of stuff about using near-death experiences and psychics to try to prove the existence of life after death. Some of his other books are "The Afterlife Codes: Searching for Evidence of the Survival of the Soul", "The Afterlife experiments: Breakthrough Scientific Experiments of Life After Death" and "Science and the Soul: The Survival of Counsciousness After Death".

      What about Russek? She is also a Ph.D. psychologist, and president and director of The Heart Science Foundation, whose motto is "When we are ready to listen with our heart we are transformed". It's not clear from the web site, but I suspect that Russed *is* the Heart Science Foundation. Various sources attribute her interest in near death experiences and the afterlife to her heartbreak over the death of her father. Russek came with what Schwartz calls the "Russek paradigm", which was basically an experiment intended to try to communicate with the dead using psychic mediums. From an article about the experiment:

      The medium sat facing a wall while a researcher looked on. A "sitter", who had recently lost a relative or friend, would then enter the room and sit six feet behind the medium.

      Schwartz acknowledged that a few of the sitters were acquaintances of the mediums.

      For up to 10 minutes, the medium and the sitter would sit in silence. The medium, who could not see the sitter, would concentrate on receiving psychic impressions.

      A question and answer session followed, in which the sitter was allowed only to answer "yes" or "no."

      Schwartz said that the mediums did not play "20 questions" with the sitter in an attempt to weed out personal information. Instead, they tried to clarify impressions they were receiving. "They often try to get confirmatory

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    3. Re:Okay, the followup articles . . . by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      I concur about the discov channel bit, and as far as the bunk bit goes, that is why I posted it here, to get feedback, see if I'm the only one who has ever heard such things, see what the rest of the population (/. seems to generally hit a higher percentage of brainy people) knows, and to start a discussion based on the possibility that this is possible (I believe it is, in my gut, no pun intended)

      You're thoughts, and please keep in mind, there is a more developed post off a different child post, might help keep things in order by following one logical discussion, except where a fork is deemed necessary, or until Rob's system archives this article, eh?

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    4. Re:Okay, the followup articles . . . by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm sure the transplanted organs would include some stem cells, and those stem cells can move about and generate new cells.

      After all, it has been discovered that a mother can have her baby son's stem cells end up in her brain. Look it up. (So in a way, the Bible's concept of a man and woman becoming one flesh can be true even in a near literal sense).

      I won't be too surprised if simple urges and food preferences changed, but I'd be surprised if detailed facts actually got transferred.

      That said, apparently the process of forming long term memories involve brain cells moving about.

      --
    5. Re:Okay, the followup articles . . . by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Do you know what "BA" and "PTA" stand for here? BA is "Bachelor of Arts", which as everyone knows is basically the modern high school diploma. PTA is "Physical Therapy Assistant". Takeuchi has no credibility.

      I love intellectual snobbery.

      I hold no degrees at all. Does this mean I know nothing?

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    6. Re:Okay, the followup articles . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably know some things, but in my eyes perhaps you got them wrong (without proper instruction). If I had to trust the opinions of two people, I'd pick the one well versed in the field. Easiest way to determine that? Degrees. Either that or I have to sit with you for an hour to hear your field experience and then do background checks to make sure you were informed by people who knew what they were talking about.

    7. Re:Okay, the followup articles . . . by swillden · · Score: 1

      I hold no degrees at all. Does this mean I know nothing?

      Are you claiming to have a revolutionary new theory about the nature and processes of memory/cognition?

      Degrees are no indicator of intelligence or ability, but it's sufficiently rare that someone who hasn't seriously studied a scientific field advances that field, and that someone seriously studies a field without doing in in a university setting that leads to a degree, that it's generally quite reasonable to dismiss claims of major advancements by people without the typical academic credentials.

      Heck, if you want evidence that degrees don't mean much, consider Gary Schwartz. The man has a Ph.D. from Harvard, but he obviously can't design a decent experiment, or think very clearly.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    8. Re:Okay, the followup articles . . . by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      Are you claiming to have a revolutionary new theory about the nature and processes of memory/cognition?

      NO, but I do have an idea about something that I would like to find the logical flaws in, not the physical, what is a thought experiment when it leaves the mind?

      It's sufficiently rare that someone who hasn't seriously studied a scientific field advances that field

      See, I agree perfectly well with this statement (and the other related, just didn't feel like copying them all, per se)

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    9. Re:Okay, the followup articles . . . by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      actually yes, I was familiar with this information about stem cells and mothers. However, my information on the subject (which does not imply perfect knowledge) is that it is only with the first pregnancy that this occurs.

      As far as the cells moving around, sure they do, all organ's cells move, they have to be constantly replaced, right? No, I'm not stating that every [period of time] every cell in your body is in the act of being replaced, but over time, yes, right? By the same token, I can understand that chemicals in the brain may not leave, but to say that the cells are just dying off and not being replaced at all sounds a little wierd to me.

      But also as far as the cells moving around, wouldn't that be an example of forming new paths? Look at concrete dividers on the highway in a major city. They don't move often (to us, not time lapse photography or a vacationer or whatever), but they can be moved to represent a new route through wherever, right? So why can't the brain cells be rerouted to connect two different nerve bundles, or whatever controls memory?

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    10. Re:Okay, the followup articles . . . by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Check this out though: http://cbcl.mit.edu/cbcl/news/files/caltech-6-05.h tml

      I'd think it's more likely that that single cell only fires to a particular sequence of waves in the neurons around it.

      Still, I found that quite interesting. What happens if that cell dies? Do you suddenly have to "relearn" that particular memory item?

      Maybe that's why once in a while a common word appears unfamiliar?

      I'm not a neuroscientist etc, but if that "single cell" thingy recognizing something very specific and high level is true and that some cells migrate to form long term memories, then it's not too far fetched that you have a single cell that fires for a specific long term memory.

      I guess as you recreate the brain patterns of that memory, that cell fires when you get a match. I say this because another recent research states that as people recall stuff in the past, they recreate the brain states.

      http://www.seedmagazine.com/news/2005/12/mental_ti me_travel.php

      Sorry too lazy to do proper links ;).

      --
    11. Re:Okay, the followup articles . . . by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      Cool, thanks for the heads up, see this is why bumping heads together in a public way is helpful. Very interesting info

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
  33. Re:Nice: 43 Years Later Slashdot's Still got the e by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is older than internet and I combined. Did someone just take Psychology 100 recently?

    Hmm. I think someone needs to go get checked out for just this sort of brain injury - if it was 1953, then it was 53 years ago, not 43. The year is 2006, not 1996.

  34. Textbook by Cee · · Score: 1

    Speaking as a psychology geek, this is textbook. You hear about this case the first semester in class. But it's nice to see this on /. aswell, available to the general geek public.

  35. The Missing Marine by rca66 · · Score: 1

    In his great book "The Man who Mistook his Wife for a Hat" Oliver Sacks describes a similar case, where a former soldier is bound to the same condition. He is living shortly after WWII. During one of their talks Sacks shows him pictures from the moon landing. The man is completely shocked, and Sacks was very sorry about what he did. But at least the man forgot about this shock shortly afterwards.

    1. Re:The Missing Marine by PeDRoRist · · Score: 1

      If Sacks was a sadistic bastard, he could have showed him those pictures every day, for years. You know, for fun.

      Or maybe I'm the sadistic bastard.

      --

      Anything you do can get you slashdotted, including nothing.
    2. Re:The Missing Marine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Having just read that chapter last night (completely by coincidence), I'll have to correct you: the man was very surprised, but not upset, about seeing the picture of Earthrise. What got him real upset was seeing his own old face in a mirror, because he truly believed he was a young guy. This latter incident is what Sacks was sorry about.

  36. This is fantastic by Placebo+Messiah · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just wanna say, you are a really smart buncha nerdy people. How you ended up on my TV isn't even relevant right now. I'm truly inspired by your fresh approach to scientific criticism and humour. kudos to you all and let the show go on!

    1. Re:This is fantastic by PeDRoRist · · Score: 1

      I'm terribly sorry sir, only /. editors are allowed to post dupes.

      --

      Anything you do can get you slashdotted, including nothing.
    2. Re:This is fantastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok - KARMA WHORE.

    3. Re:This is fantastic by TheLetterPsy · · Score: 1

      You don't get karma bonuses for +Funny mods.

  37. This is fantastic by Placebo+Messiah · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just wanna say, you are a really smart buncha nerdy people. How you ended up on my TV isn't even relevant right now. I'm truly inspired by your fresh approach to scientific criticism and humour. praise to you all and let the show go on!

  38. so that means by not_a_product_id · · Score: 1

    "you cannot teach him facts about a bicycle that he doesn't know, but he could learn to ride a bycicle, if he doesn't know how"

    So you could teach him to ride a bike but he'd be unable to to remember that he can ride a bike? Now that would be a weird experience.

    --

    ---
    We spoke for about a half an hour. I don't recall a thing we said. - Colorblind James Experience

    1. Re:so that means by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 1

      "So you could teach him to ride a bike but he'd be unable to to remember that he can ride a bike? Now that would be a weird experience."

      I know kung fu? Whoa!

      --
      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    2. Re:so that means by boinger · · Score: 1

      "Wow, you speak French, too!?"

      *eye roll* "Apparently."

      --
      Send your friends messages of love at fuck-you.org
    3. Re:so that means by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1
      So you could teach him to ride a bike but he'd be unable to to remember that he can ride a bike? Now that would be a weird experience.

      If this is the same guy I've heard of, then it's already happened. Every time he plays ping-pong for the first time, he thinks he's got a natural gift for it.

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    4. Re:so that means by Mahou · · Score: 1

      Whoa! I know ping-pong.

      --
      if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
      ...te?
  39. Drew Barrymore... by Shawn+is+an+Asshole · · Score: 1

    Damn she was hot in that movie...

    --
    "It ain't a war against drugs.it's a war against personal freedom" --Bill Hicks
  40. On the bright side... by hummassa · · Score: 1

    He is not really aware that he is being peeked and poked for the last fifty years, which is good.
    But, OTOH, did the surgery ended the Freaking seizures?

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  41. Damn by PeDRoRist · · Score: 1

    And as I'm also a nitpicking conjugating masochistic bastard, I'll just hit my fingertips with a stainless-steel ruler over and over again for typing "showed" instead of "shown".

    Sadistic AND Masochistic (AND off-topic): endless fun

    --

    Anything you do can get you slashdotted, including nothing.
  42. A bit about my boyfriend by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Interesting
    In 1996 my boyfriend Andy suffered a subarachnoid hemorrhage from an aneurysm, and after surgery to repair it, had an ischemic stroke which hit his hypothalamus. End result: almost no short-term memory, like the subject of this article.

    In the weeks afterward, Andy had some fairly classic stroke symptoms, including paralysis on his right side. He couldn't talk, even to say his own name. But he could sing songs with people, because that skill is located on the right side of the brain, rather than on the left side with our language centers. And when his nasogastric feeding tube was pulled out, he spat out a very intelligible "fuck". Evidently swearing becomes a reflex.

    While he was still recovering the ability to stand and to walk, he had to be watched all the time, because he'd keep trying to get up out of his wheelchair... unsuccessfully. But the fact that he kept trying to use his right arm and leg - not remembering that they didn't work - probably helped their recovery.

    Every time I talked to Andy, I'd tell him about my new apartment; he'd usually - but not always - react with surprise. During one phone conversation (which wasn't going very well because he was distracted by the TV in front of him), I asked if I could talk to his father (with whom he was staying). Andy put down the cordless phone, saw that Dad was busy, looked up at the TV... and forgot I was there. I had to yell from the sofa cushion to get his attention, so he'd pick up the phone again. Conversations were always difficult because "what did you do today?" would elicit either shrugs or he'd just make something up, his mind grasping at any random memory that might serve as an answer. I frequently fell back on retelling him the same stories about my life lately, just to fill time and stay connected to him, and hoping that maybe they'd sink in.

    He did gradually form some new memories. His therapists accomplished some of this by chronic repetition. Living in an environment with lots of calendars and repeated quizzes about the month and year, he got fairly good at remembering that. By asking him over and over during our drive home from a restaurant what the name of it was (no, he didn't find it annoying; each time I asked he barely remembered that previous time), he was able to remember it an hour later. Once, in response to me commenting about my shitty finances, he commented about "the new apartment". After several months of telling him about the fact that I'd gone back to college for another degree, he seemed surprised when I mentioned it again, but on a hunch I asked him what the name of it was, and he remembered. But for the most part, he learned to compensate for short-term memory with habits and with a lot of clever guessing.

    I wish I could tell you about Andy's condition in the long-term, but his family won't let me see or talk to him anymore. (They say he'd get overstimulated and unmanageable after I visited or called on the phone... and I never got along that well with them to begin with.) I fought this at first, but since they're better able to care for him (they have money and a support network; I'm just me and underemployed), and since he's painlessly unaware that I'm not in his life anymore (for all he knows, he might have just seen me yesterday), I finally had to let go. More of the personal sob-story details can be found here.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:A bit about my boyfriend by CmdrTookah · · Score: 1

      Hypothalamus or hippocampus?

      Hypothalamus: Crude desires like hunger, thirst, sex.

      Hippocampus: Memory consolidation, formation.

    2. Re:A bit about my boyfriend by tverbeek · · Score: 1
      Hippocampus.

      This has been an example of how linguistic memory is affected by the waking-up process. {yawn}

      (And I can assure you that Andy's desires for food and sex were completely unaffected. At one point when he was regaining his ability to talk, the speech therapist was doing object-recognition drills with him. She held up a sheet of paper and asked him to name it. He hesitated. "A piece of..." she prompted him. "Man's ass!" he finished.)

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    3. Re:A bit about my boyfriend by digidave · · Score: 1

      Great story. Tragic, scary and depressing, but great nonetheless.

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    4. Re:A bit about my boyfriend by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      I would just like to say that I am sorry for your loss.

      I have a bunch of thoughts swirling around in my head from your story, but all I can coherently write is my condolences.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    5. Re:A bit about my boyfriend by vortigern00 · · Score: 1

      So this brings up some interesting thoughts.

      Not only was his sexual impulse unaffected, but his sexual orientation was not either. It didn't occur to me to even think about this until you mentioned it.

      I am led to wonder if anyone has studied patients with damage to various parts of the brain to find evidence of alteration of sexual preference.

      Seems to me this would lead to scientific proof that gayness is not a result of something being wrong with you.

      Disclaimer: I am a straight man who believes gayness is not a "disorder" or even "fixable", but is a normal part of life.

    6. Re:A bit about my boyfriend by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

      Oh dude that is a sad story...way to ruin my lunch break, kidding, of course. I don't know what to say, but it makes me think of my own relationship and how special I suppose it is. Easy to take for granted that out loved ones are there. I know he will always be special for you, but I hope that you meet someone new someday and have another shot at love like that.

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    7. Re:A bit about my boyfriend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking fags.

    8. Re:A bit about my boyfriend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      waste of oxygen

    9. Re:A bit about my boyfriend by Mad_Rain · · Score: 1

      Is that a fancy way of saying he got bit by a spider?

      The Arachnoid Mater is a layer of tissue (meninges) that protects your brain. So a subarachnoid hemorrhage is bleeding underneath that layer of tissue. And bleeding in your brain = bad.

      --
      "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
    10. Re:A bit about my boyfriend by seminumerical · · Score: 1

      There is probably more than one contributing factor to being gay. It does look like it or they are almost entirely innate. However, in my Abnormal Psych class many years ago we read an unusual case study of a man who had had homosexual encounters and there was something abnormal about him. I believe he'd never had an orgasm. For some reason they electrically stimulated an epileptic fit in his limbic lobes (which I think is what similar to what happens when you have an orgasm anyway). After that epileptic fit he was sexually active and heterosexual. Feel free to correct the details since that is all from memory. It was in the case studies prepared by Prof. Pihl at McGill University for Abnormal Psych. (After hanging on to them for 15 years in case I might one day want to refer to them, I discarded them about a month ago, hehe).

      --
      In wartime... truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies. (Churchill)
    11. Re:A bit about my boyfriend by tverbeek · · Score: 1
      I hope that you meet someone new someday and have another shot at love like that.

      Thanks, all. I'm reasonably happy with my life as it is. And I'm a different person now, so I'd have to say that there's really no chance of me feeling the same way about anyone else.

      But I wouldn't mind finding someone new who inspires me to feel for him differently.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    12. Re:A bit about my boyfriend by tverbeek · · Score: 1
      Well, Andy was always a bit "eclectic" in his sexual interests, so even if he exhibited some previously unexpressed interests afterward, that wouldn't definitely established that he'd actually changed... just that he hadn't gotten around to going after a butch latino pre-op female-to-male transsexual before. {grin}

      People can change in many ways because of a stroke. I was lucky that Andy's personality remained largely unaffected (except for an obvious accentuation of his flightiness), but that's not always the case. And stroke isn't the only thing that can make a person change; time and experience do that as well, but less dramatically. One way I've changed over the years is that I no longer care what determines sexual orientation. It is what it is, and even if it can change, that doesn't mean that it should.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  43. Well of COURSE... by EngrBohn · · Score: 1

    Looking back on it, of *course* he's stuck in a time-warp. We could infer from H.M.'s experience that the temporal lobes are responsible for our progression forward through time.

    It seems obvious in hindsight that temporal lobes would be responsible for temporal mechanics.

    --
    cb
    Oooh! What does this button do!?
  44. Writing the name down works for me by Emor+dNilapasi · · Score: 1

    I have much the same problem, but I find that if I write the name down I can visualize the written name and match it to the person. Weird, I know, but it works for me.

  45. Good book on HM by docdoc · · Score: 1

    In case this sparks someone's interest, a good book on HM is "Memory's ghost", by Philip Hilts. It's a fascinating read that does of good job of explaining the backgound of why this was done at the time, and what HM's day to day experience may be like.

  46. Life imitates art.. by Zarquon · · Score: 1

    There is a classic science fiction story by John Pierce (Invariant, 1944, Astounding) wherein a man figures out how to make himself immortal.. but loses the capability to form new memories. Hasn't been reprinted in a while, but a very good story. You can find it in the first Astounding Anthology, amongst other collections.

    --
    "'Tis great confidence in a friend to tell him your faults, greater to tell him his." --Poor Richard's Almanac
  47. sort of common by drfireman · · Score: 3, Informative

    Memory deficits are a risk of epilepsy surgery. As yet there's no truly reliable way to predict post-surgical memory problems, but since surgery is generally a last resort, it's a risk the patients have to take. This kind of memory problem is also typical of Wernicke-Korsakoff's Syndrome, dramatized in the second chapter of Oliver Sacks's "The Man who Mistook his Wife for a Hat," which is often a consequence of long drinking binges (and an accompanying vitamin deficiency, I think). You don't always see the truly dense amnesia, but when you do it's striking.

  48. He's happy, though, he keeps busy... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1

    He's happy, though, as he likes to keep busy working as a Slashdot editor.

    1. Re:He's happy, though, he keeps busy... by objekt · · Score: 1

      I hear this guy is a Slashdot editor! That's why he never notices dupes!

      --
      -- Boycott Shell
    2. Re:He's happy, though, he keeps busy... by chinton · · Score: 1

      Isn't Henry one of the /. editors? That would explain a lot of the duplication!

    3. Re:He's happy, though, he keeps busy... by sserendipity · · Score: 1

      I hear this guy is a Slashdot editor! That's why he never notices dupes!!

  49. Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow by objekt · · Score: 1

    He saw Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow and said it reminds him of movies from his childhood.

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
    1. Re:Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow by BTO · · Score: 0, Funny

      The second time he saw it, he said it reminds him of movies from his childhood.

      --

      Banach-Tarski Overdrive
    2. Re:Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      The RIAA and the MPAA are bound to go after this guy, there is just something so anti copyright about being able to watch your favorite movies and listen to your favorite albums everyday for the first time, you would never have a reason to buy any other media ever again.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  50. Huh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems like I've heard this story somewhere before.

  51. The worst memory defect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have the very worst memory defect, for a married guy anyway - I always forget to put the toilet seat down. Hell hath no fury...

  52. Makes dating interesting by nule.org · · Score: 1
    I have this same issue and I can recall dating in high school and college being a real challenge. I would be on a date with someone and not at all able to remember their name. If there were other friends around I could usually just wait and someone else would say their name (not that I'd remember it in half an hour), or I would play a game where I'd try to see their driver license/other form of ID that'd have their name on it. You'd be surprised, though, how long you can go without saying another person's name.

    Fortunately, I've since discovered World of Warcraft which means 1) I don't have to worry about dating ever again, and 2) everybody I want to talk to has their name written in blue above their heads.

    1. Re:Makes dating interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On dates, you could've just admitted that you can't remember her name, but then say: "...but i'll never forget your smile/eyes/etc" ;)

  53. SOMEONE MOD THIS INFORMATIVE BITTE by hummassa · · Score: 0

    Thanks, pal.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  54. And the research came to an abrupt end when... by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    ...they showed the patient how to do 'Scene Selections' during playback of the DVD 'Memento', and his head exploded.
     

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  55. Re:Shock Therapy by Meostro · · Score: 4, Informative
    how does shocking something and causing intense and long lasting pain and anguish make them better?
    It's not supposed to cause "intense" or "long lasting pain", it's supposed to be administered under anaesthesia so you don't even know what happened. The concept of ECT is sort of like a reboot.

    Your computer (like your body) may run fine for a while, it may even go to sleep and wake back up and go on running normally. Eventually you may come across some quirky behaviour (mental disorder) that you can't fix with patches (surgery?) or subsystem resets (drugs?). When all else fails, you reboot your computer (ECT) and everything goes back to normal.

    ECT induces a seizure, and your brain sort of shuts down and resets itself. The mechanisms aren't entirely understood, but it works well to treat severe depression.

    Electro-Shock Therapy has been portrayed as horrible torture (which it was used for) and has been tried for the treatment of many mental conditions (like schizophrenia and personality disorders) where it does little to no good. It definitely has a shady past, but the modern reality is much more benign and therapeutic.
  56. He can be cured with a new brain prosthesis by lhaeh · · Score: 1
    It would replace his lost hippocampus. I don't think it has been used on humans yet though.

    http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn3488

  57. CONTEST: What is the oldest piece of "News" on /.? by feijai · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    This "news" is a famous medical case which dates from the 1950s. I heard about it in elementary school. I think it is the tiredest piece of information which /. has ever reported on as "News for Nerds".

    So I'm offering a contest. I will personally mail $5 to the person who comes up with a piece of "News" on /. that's older and more tired than this one. Whoever finds the oldest piece ever wins.

    The rules:

    1. You must respond directly this message, otherwise it doesn't count.
    2. If only a few people respond, I will not mail out the $5, but I will still say who I think won.
    3. I'm the judge and jury. No griping.
    4. The item shouldn't be about something that's old: the news itself should be old.
    5. The news only wins if it's provably old -- you need to provide evidence if it's not self-evident.
    6. I will reply to the winner. To receive the $5 you must reply again giving me some way to identify who you are and send you some $$$. There are various ways to do this: you could post a snail-mail address to send it to; if you are worried people will carpet-bomb your address, we could work out a public-key encryption thingamajigger transaction. If you do not reply in a timely fashion (say, a day), I will go down the list and offer the $5 to the next person.
  58. A visual thinker writes by metamatic · · Score: 1
    Do you people actually see things in your heads? Can you picture a face/scene/object/symbol - and really look at it?

    Yes. In fact, I do basic arithmetic by visualizing patterns of dots, and then counting them. For example, for 8 - 3 I'll visualize 8 as

    * *
    * *
    * *
    * *

    then remove 3 from one of the top corners to leave

    *
    * *
    * *

    which is 5. Basically, I have shapes like Tetris pieces for the common integers.

    I'm almost completely a visual thinker. I can navigate wonderfully, read maps fine, but I'm hopeless at giving directions because I don't know any of the street names. If I have to walk from point A to point B a few blocks away I literally visualize the route as if looking from above, or in 3D from street level: walk along here, turn left 20 degrees near the large white building, down the hill, and so on.

    Another thing that might amuse you: there used to be a joke Mac extension which removed all the text from the menus. I could still use my typical software with it installed, because I navigate based on the physical location of the labels in the menu.

    Which as an aside, is one reason why Windows XP's dynamically hiding things from the menu is a complete UI disaster for people like me.

    One advantage of visual route finding, though, is that it works even when there aren't any street labels, in a location you've never been before. Out on a cross-country run in the middle of a forest once with a friend, we decided it was time to head back. I turned left about 40 degrees and started walking. My friend said "Hang on, we came from that way." We argued a bit, but he wouldn't budge. I walked back in a straight line. He finally got back half an hour after me.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    1. Re:A visual thinker writes by nanoakron · · Score: 1

      Very interesting stuff. Good to hear of someone else who operates in the same way I seem to :)

      -Nano.

    2. Re:A visual thinker writes by c4ffeine · · Score: 1

      Wow, I can't imagine having that kind of mind. I just tried doing that adding/subtracting thing, and noticed that the amounts don't stay the same for me- all I can seem to keep in my mind is the fact that there's supposed to be some dots or objects. The exact number is impossible to determine. It's really hard to explain, though. Anyone else like that out there?

      --
      "73% of quotes on the Internet are made up" -Ben Franklin
  59. afterlife by Reverse+Gear · · Score: 1

    but even if I weren't already an atheist it would have been total confirmation that there is no afterlife

    Well this experience doesn't necesarily lead into atheism, for me it leads to the conclusion that the soul is not immortal.

    Your experience does seem to discredit a lot of belief systems, but for example this one is not discreditet by it.

  60. How does that work? by Mille+Mots · · Score: 1
    WRONG - If I have to chagne my lifestyle to accomdoate the habits of others my rights are violated.

    And yet, you seem to assert that if a smoker has to change their habits to accomdoate [sic] your lifestyle, their rights are not violated?

    How does that work?

    --
    Sig arrêt

    1. Re:How does that work? by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      They are the one violating the rights of others by their lifestyle, my lifestyle does not violate the rights of others.

      Pretty simple concept of you actually understand the difference between "rights" and "license"

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    2. Re:How does that work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you understand the concept of obnoxious busybody?

      There are numerous things I do daily that can shorten my life, and could maybe even harm others in the process. I'm surrounded by tons of people doing the same. This happens every day, because this is life.

      We're not going to bubble-wrap the entire god-damned world just so you can feel comfortable.

    3. Re:How does that work? by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      Fuck you, i'm demanding my rights be respected not "that the world be bubblewrapped"

      grow some balls and post without the anonymous coward tag asshat.

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
  61. Thank you for following up even more by drachenstern · · Score: 1

    I had actually started doing that thread while i was at work last night, so I didn't even have the time I desired for following up myself, as I have school this morning.

    Yes I understand the BA and PTA, however, they followed her name on the article, so I followed it as well, since I was aiming for quotes, and to save some people the trouble of just clicking through.

    I didn't imagine the author's had a tremendous amount of scientific evidence to back them up, and honestly wasn't even that concerned with the authors so much as the noted anecdotal evidence that could begin to illustrate the idea that organs could carry memory. If they were quacks would totally throw off my argument, but these individuals can apparently think for themselves in some regards, as they have degrees (medical degree is not something to sneeze at, doesn't make you a genius, however). To say that she has NO credibility to me is discarding the fact that she has direct contact with some of these reported individuals. Do all individuals who have had an organ transplant exhibit these signs? I do not know.

    Whether or not an individual has a soul (I believe so, very southern baptist) is not at question here, however. Who says the brain is the only place where the mind resides, or memories, this is my argument.

    Obviously the ancients knew that the mind extended throughout the body, look at their attempts to treat diseases of the mind. Take that thought process forward and look at current medicines. By taking a pill, we are not ensuring that the medicines are going directly to the brain, but rather through the blood system, which takes it to all parts of the body.

    This was the focus of my posting the links, but I am grateful to you for having done the checking to verify that my posts showed people who had their own very definite agendas, not scientific advancement. It shows how just looking for five minutes on the internet does not show everything a person needs to know. That is definitely one of the reasons why I enjoy the community here on /., even if it's not the front page crowd, no that should read, especially when it's not the front page crowd.

    While I stand and applaud your research, let me take a moment and ask you what are your opinions now on the subject matter at hand, not the method of delivery? What are your thoughts on the ability of the bodies organs and various cells to store memories, and the thought that the mind is the central connecting agency, not the prime storage facility? Would this possibly in some way point to why we only use 10% of our cranial capacity? (These can be considered widely spread and disassociated thoughts)

    Bear in mind that I agree with you that these individuals, who possess a spirit of only pushing their own agenda and refuse to use a scientific method to obtain repeatable results, cannot have their arguments put under the microscope here. Instead, I ask, I urge you to consider the physical consequences involved in what I am proposing/asking about.

    --
    2^3 * 31 * 647
    1. Re:Thank you for following up even more by F_Scentura · · Score: 1

      "Would this possibly in some way point to why we only use 10% of our cranial capacity? (These can be considered widely spread and disassociated thoughts)"

      You're basing your worldview of "extra" brain capacity off of a new-age urban legend that has nothing to do with anatomy, medicine, or any science whatsoever.

      http://www.snopes.com/science/stats/10percnt.htm

    2. Re:Thank you for following up even more by swillden · · Score: 1

      medical degree is not something to sneeze at, doesn't make you a genius, however

      None of the people in question have a medical degree. Having medical degrees wouldn't make them geniuses, but it might give reason to believe they know something about anatomy. As it is, they don't even have that.

      While I stand and applaud your research, let me take a moment and ask you what are your opinions now on the subject matter at hand, not the method of delivery? What are your thoughts on the ability of the bodies organs and various cells to store memories, and the thought that the mind is the central connecting agency, not the prime storage facility?

      I think it's total hokum.

      Would this possibly in some way point to why we only use 10% of our cranial capacity?

      I think this is also total hokum.

      Note that both of those things may be true, but there is neither any credible evidence to support them nor any particular reason to prefer them over other random theories, which makes them hokum.

      I urge you to consider the physical consequences involved in what I am proposing/asking about.

      Well, once consequence of the brain-as-connector-not-storage would be that having a transplant should not only teach you new things, but make you forget things also. I don't notice any anecdotal stories about that. If the hypothesis is that it's not just the gut that's involved in memory, but the whole body, then you would expect people who lose the larger part of their body mass to also lose the larger part of their memory. I've never heard of any such, have you? I've never heard of a quadruple amputee suffering any memory loss (unless the trauma that cause them to lose their limbs also injured their head). Another consequence is that if, say, your liver were involved in memory we should expect to see increased neural activity in the liver during recall of incidents that were stored there. I've never heard of anything like that, either.

      Further, do you have any proposed physical mechanism by which memories could be stored in such disparate tissues? Though we don't understand exactly how, it seems very reasonable that the way neurons work in the brain could be used to store information. In fact, there's no other obvious purpose for many of the things that go on. The same is not true of the heart or the liver, AFAIK.

      Nope, I think it's all hokum.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    3. Re:Thank you for following up even more by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      That we only use 10% of our brain is a myth. There are many more articles out there but the 10% thing is just an urban legend.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    4. Re:Thank you for following up even more by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      medical degree is not something to sneeze at, doesn't make you a genius, however

      None of the people in question have a medical degree. Having medical degrees wouldn't make them geniuses, but it might give reason to believe they know something about anatomy. As it is, they don't even have that.

      so quoting the gp post, you state about Pearsall that Okay, so he's a Psychologist, not an MD and while this does refute my medical degree claim, however, hasn't a masters of science degree proven that he can think? or better, what about the PhD of Russek's? I misunderstood what I read above, I was in the middle of class copiously taking notes (i'll give you the transcript if you like) so was not 100% focused on what I read, thought that you had mentioned that one or the other of them was a medical doctor.

      In as far as loss of memory, people lose their memory all the time. Normally it is attributed to the aging process or the fact that someone is really tired or whatever, but what if, in the case of the elderly, the problem is that their minds have forgotten what paths the information lie upon? In multiple amputee victims or the like, well, I am pitifully without information on this one. I can neither confirm nor deny that they have loss or no loss of memory, however, I suspect, neither can you. If you can, by all means, share with me.

      Why is it necessary that the organ have an easily measurable electronic signature during information recall? On top of that, I have never seen a person have their liver being scanned during thought process recording. Actually, I don't even know if that's a good name to call what I am trying to describe, and am sure there is a true name for the process, but I am not a medical student, and have never heard the name for recording thought processes by way of viewing the body with a special aparatus. I assume it's the MRI process, but I thought that was a special way to take a 3d snapshot of a body, not monitor it's activities in detail on an electronic level. Just because the platters of a hard drive spin doesn't mean that they have a current running through them, does it? Last I checked, applying much of a current would probably ruin the data on the platter. Now the motor on the other hand, would show lots of electrical activity.

      As far as why most people don't normally show memory loss, possibly it is that the memories that are lost are those we don't need often? The reason why the liver being removed doesn't cause us to lose important information is that it only stores the silly stuff? I really don't know, if I did, do you think I would be having this conversation, or do you think I would be in a lab somewhere trying to help make life better for the affected and just be posting my paper here for the world to read, thereby enlightening all to the method by which memory in the human body is stored and lost?

      However, does my theory truly have so many holes that it is akin to swiss cheese? Consider some of the works of Leonardo DaVinci (not that I could ever be 1% of the genius that he was), even though all he did a lot of the time that gets him recognized now was he wrote down what he saw, and thought about it. Here I apply his concept, as many before me have. I see that (rather, hear about) people who have organ transplants have new memories, and I wonder what could cause that, and if there could be a rational explanation or is it all metaphysical, so then where does the soul seperate from the body if you are picking up information from somebody else's body? These are all questions that I feel are larger than myself, but just as a castle is larger than one man, many men together may defeat it, that is to say, break it down and show the insides for what they are. But not every siege in history was successful, so this may still elude even the best of minds upon the planet. To paraphrase Mr. Newton, I stand upo

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    5. Re:Thank you for following up even more by swillden · · Score: 1

      at this point I await your response

      Sorry, but I'm not really interested in discussing it further. Given that there is no evidence that refutes the standard theory and lots of evidence to support the standard theory so I don't really see any point in speculating about it.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:Thank you for following up even more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, "wouldn't it be neat if parapsychology was real and there was a mentalist existence?" doesn't offer anything of substance to research.

  62. Re:Shock Therapy by jeremymiles · · Score: 1

    I've always imagined it went something like:
    "We've given your brain a really big electric shock. Do you feel better, or do you want us to do it again?"

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  63. No not just motor memory by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    But there's a difference between skills and facts. Doesn't just have to do with motor skills, but all skills. In a way it makes sense, just giving you a set of facts about how something is done doesn't teach you how to do it, you have to practise it before you have the skill.

    There's a lot of literature on it if you are interested, his condition has been studied pretty extensively, but what it comes down to is you can teach him new skills, motor or otherwise, but he doens't know he has those skills.

  64. I don't understand something by Guspaz · · Score: 1

    From an interview with him:

    "Well, what I keep thinking is that possibly I had an operation. And somehow the memory is gone...And I'm trying to figure it out...I think of it all the time. I don't remember this, and why I don't remember that."

    How does he know he keeps thinking that? How does he know he thinks of it all the time? Is he simply assuming that because he is thinking about it now he must think about it often in general?

  65. Re:Nice: 43 Years Later Slashdot's Still got the e by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

    I was wondering the same thing. It's a fascinating case and all, but I remember learning about HM in my Intro to Psych class (8 years ago), and have since taught about him to middle school psych students.

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  66. My basis... by jd · · Score: 1
    You mean, other than reading through the leaflets I get when I go get refills?


    My personal experience with psych meds:


    • Lithium: It's effective, but lowers my seizure threshold. A failure to drink vast amounts of liquid could cause liver failure, kidney failure, brain damage (through seizures), or just regular death.
    • Zyprexa: Caused me to lose colour vision temporarily, increased blood pressure dangerously and I believe death is listed as a known side-effect.
    • Paxil: It's supposedly addictive, but I've not experienced that. It's known to cause suicidal thoughts in kids, though that doesn't apply to me. Doctors don't recommend it much, these days, because the list of side-effects is growing.
    • Neurontin: The side effects are nasty, but don't seem to apply to me. Long-term studies on seizure meds don't exist, because most haven't existed much beyond 10-15 years. (One sixth of a typical lifespan.)
    • Adavan: Not advised for regular use, because of potential long-term effects. I have to take the bloody stuff every day.
    • Ibilify: Gave me severe headaches, studies suggest that other side effects can include death. I was pulled off of it, as the risks were considered too high.


    Personal experience. Probably the best basis short of a medical degree that I could have. (Between close friends and close relatives, I know 3 people who do have medical degrees, one of whom has "specialized" in psychology and neurology.)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:My basis... by bloodredsun · · Score: 1
      While I'm not a medic I have spent 7 years at University studying Neurophysiology, I believe that the only anti-epilepsy drugs(AEDs)in the above list is Neurontin (gabapentin) which doesn't have that bad a side effect profile. All the others are for other psychiatric conditions, not neurophysiological ones.

      I really feel for you having to take all these pills, you must rattle when you walk but the side effects of AEDs are really quite small when compared to their method of action and their widespread use and I would hate to think that people might not take their medication as they thought that AEDs had a similar profile to the other above drugs.

    2. Re:My basis... by rafa · · Score: 1
      Zyprexa: Caused me to lose colour vision temporarily

      While that sounds like it would have been an unsettling experience - it'd be fascinating to know what it was like. Hmm, phrasing "what did the absence of colour look like" doesn't quite get across what I'm curious about. Perhaps what I'd be curious to know is - what was there in place of where one would have seen a colour - only contrast?

      --
      [Science] is one of the very few things that raises human life a little above farce and gives it the grace of tragedy.
  67. I wonder by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is he still looking for John G.?

  68. Re:Shock Therapy by Vellmont · · Score: 1

    Great that you compare it to "rebooting a computer" because we really have very little idea how ECT works. The brain doesn't do anything akin to rebooting, so this analogy is completely worthless. It does permanent changes to the brain and we really have little clue as to what kind of changes. If you want an analogy, maybe "scrambling the hard drive" would be a better one, but even then we really have no clue as to how it works. The fact that it's no longer violent because people are anesthetized when it's done is really beside the point.

    --
    AccountKiller
  69. Re:Am I the troll? Or are you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every single generation before you shrugged off harsh environments. This generation whines if there's a perceptible difference they find displeasing. Rest assured, while you think you're strong and in control, and working for the benefit of others, you're not.
    If you could travel back in time to find your tobacco-smoking great-great grandfather, and you told him to put that out because it bothers you, he would probably kick your ass, put that cigarette out in your face, and piss on you for good measure. Because you're a whiney oversensitive little bitch, and it is none of your business what he does. If he ever found out you were his offspring, he would probably cut off his own balls to prevent your birth. He'd probably use a spoon to do it, because people were tough as nails back then.
      As you faded from existence you'd curse him for not sterilizing the spoon, getting a tetnus shot, not using anasthesia, or for not using antibiotics. Because, you know, his infection could cause a health epidemic. Or because it will raise insurance premiums for everyone! yeah!

    I'm suprised you even managed to make it out of the birth canal...

  70. Re:Am I the troll? Or are you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow you're a total fucking retard

    need some chlorine stat! the chlorine level in the gene pool is getting a little low!

  71. Re:tedium, perhaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...whereas tofu-eating non-smokers are more likely to have a quick stroke and die rapidly after that.

    I would assume most tofu-eating non-smokers actually die from rectal asphyxiation.
    Maybe they die from coming in contact with fun.

  72. OT:Shock Therapy by Meostro · · Score: 1
    Great that you compare it to "rebooting a computer" because we really have very little idea how ECT works. The brain doesn't do anything akin to rebooting, so this analogy is completely worthless.
    I don't have a better reference, but the aforementioned Wikipedia article states "Following the seizure, there is a short period of time during which cortical electrical activity in the brain ceases and an EEG reading is flat," which sounds an awful lot like a reboot to me.

    It does permanent changes to the brain and we really have little clue as to what kind of changes. If you want an analogy, maybe "scrambling the hard drive" would be a better one, but even then we really have no clue as to how it works.
    It does change the brain, but not like "scrambling the hard drive" as you call it. Again, based on my understanding, I'd say a closer analogy may be reinstalling your OS, but it could be as simple as rolling back whatever changes have been put in place since your last known-good system, and then rebooting. It could even be seen as the ultimate wetware buffer-overflow, it overwrites your brain "code" with crap and you have to shut down and restart.

    The fact that it's no longer violent because people are anesthetized when it's done is really beside the point.
    Actually, that's entirely my point, but to each their own.
    1. Re:OT:Shock Therapy by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      Following the seizure, there is a short period of time during which cortical electrical activity in the brain ceases and an EEG reading is flat," which sounds an awful lot like a reboot to me.


      Oh, so the brain erases everything from its memory, and rebuilds itself from a saved fresh copy of itself? Ridiculous. It does nothing like that at all. The brain isn't a computer (at least not anything like the computer on your desk). It's a neural network. Comparing ECT to a reboot is completely without merit.

      --
      AccountKiller
  73. I will say this.... by jd · · Score: 1
    Anyone - absolutely anyone - who does not take the medication they need is being foolish. I take the meds I need, not because I regard them as safe, but because the potential results of NOT taking them would be many times worse. Odds are high I would have been dead many years ago.


    If someone is unsure about the necessity or safety of their meds should discuss their concerns with a qualified person, NOT take the personal experiences of a single user of a single weblog. I earn enough that I can afford to get myself checked every so often - I've had three EEGs, two MRIs and a sleep study, and recent research would suggest I might benefit from an fMRI - but I recognize that I've been lucky from that perspective. I've also been broke for long stretches of time.


    If someone is observing side-effects, record them and their severity, then forget about them for a while. If they persist, record them again. Go to your doctor with those records, so you can say "this is what happens, this is how often, these were the circumstances, what is your advice?"


    • There are bad doctors out there who will prescribe anything that'll shut the patient up. Those doctors are generally cheap, cynical and have long-since burned out.
    • More common are OK doctors who don't know everything (but feel as though they should act as though they do), but are generally good enough to fix the real problems and explain the non-issues.
    • There are also a few really good doctors who, when they don't know something, will give the best answer they can, research (within reason), then follow up if their previous answer missed anything important.
    • Oh, and there's also the co-dependent doctors who will give some answer (to please you), research in a frenzy (because they "should"), pester you to correct things, even if nothing needs correcting, then get mad at you because you "made" them do all that.


    If you've an OK or a good doctor, side-effects shouldn't be a problem. They'll occur, but when they do, the doctor will either correct the meds or tell the person how to correct their behaviour. (If you take lithium, for example, you will suffer side effects from not drinking enough liquid. Almost any doctor will verbally beat up on someone for that.)


    If you've a bad doctor, quit and go find an OK or good doctor.


    If you've a co-dependent doctor, give them the meeting list for CoDA and -then- quit.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  74. How about this? by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1

    1770 Mechanical Chess Player Inspired Babbage. I would argue the above was news around 1850. Or, will you disallow my entry on the basis that it mentions the book that made the facts better known? In that case, the mention of the movie Momento, as well as other links, in the present article could be argued to make Henry M. a more current news item.

    1. Re:How about this? by feijai · · Score: 1

      As the sole poster, I declare you the winner. Snail mail address for the $5?

  75. burden of proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whilst I don't disagree with your individual arguments, I am concerned with the general thrust of your reasoning; the burden of proof in matters such as smoking in public, should lie absolutely with the parties in favour of deviating from the norm by smoking

    it is not, in my opinion, for the cautious parties to prove smoking, growing genetically modified crops, dosing livestock with drugs (such as antibiotics), etc. is dangerous, but rather for the innovators' parties to prove they are safe

    GrimRC
    1. Re:burden of proof by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      If you make an assertion that is scientific in nature, and you can't back it with any science, then you jeapordize your entire argument.

      It would be better to say "we don't know that this is safe," than to claim anything else. Doing anything else puts you in an indefensible position in light of contrary evidence, and destroys all credibility.

      Trust me, I don't trust any of the "science" from the scientists hired by Womens Christian Temperance early last century. Why? Because they suggested that dropping a pigs eye in hydrochloric acid is somehow demonstrative of what happens to your brain when you drink. Funny, considering that lab animals in high school that have been prepped for dissection are stored in alcohol.

  76. in reply to myself (lol) by strikethree · · Score: 1

    I just thought of something... maybe I am not the "I" that I think I am... when I stop trying to control myself, I sure feel a lot more relaxed. I wonder how intelligent I am when I do not try to be intelligent. Hehehe. I also wonder if this makes any sense.

    strike

    --
    "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  77. Treasure your Brains by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

    While I've not had anything as bad as Andy's problems, I had a stroke in April of 2005 but I've been able to work through most of the issues and medication helps. I lost the abilty to read for the most part, to write, I can't drive, I lost about 60% of the strength on my left side and about 90% of my fine motor skills and a host of other problems.

    Treasure your ability to read, write, drive, think, live, because they can be taken from you in an instant even if you live the healthiest of lives.

    I regained the ability to read and write, but now I'm faced with a medicated haze or blinding pain and the chance of a siezure, many others like Andy won't regain some of thier abilities.

    1. Re:Treasure your Brains by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      In many ways, you've had it tougher than Andy. Although he hasn't been able to resume a relatively normal life as you apparently have, he usually isn't consciously aware of this fact. He doesn't live a life of bliss - he gets angry or frustrated at times like anyone else - but he doesn't have the ongoing angst to deal with. Best of luck with your continuing recovery.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  78. NPR covered this... by bleepdot · · Score: 1

    don't know if someone else commented about this. incidently NPR (national public radio) recently covered audio interview footage of two true and real cases that went through brain surgery (well after being screwed by multiple 420). it was too movie-like to listen to. you may be able to catch a snippet online... (couldn't find it offhand).

  79. Interesting Philosophically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So does this mean that at least part of Knowledge is "knowing how" rather than "knowing that", and cannot be expressed in terms of "propositions held" or "mental content present in the brain" or something along these lines?

  80. Re:Shock Therapy by jsiren · · Score: 1

    ECT seems to me a really extreme form of therapy. I certainly hope it has really extreme benefits to justify.

    I have epilepsy, most probably of the juvenile myoclonic type, with generalised tonic-clonic seizures (fortunately suppressed by medication for more than a year now). After each seizure, I've felt headache, tiredness, severe disorientation, and a short-term memory loss, plus various physical injuries caused by the convulsions.

    Immediately after waking up from a seizure, being questioned by an ambulance crew, I've been able to recall my name and social security # (correctly), as well as the name of the current president. However, I've had no idea about what day, month or year it is, or what time of day it could possibly be, or where I was located, or what I was doing. I either checked these things or recalled them later (within the next few hours). OTOH, I've permanently lost memory of a few minutes around each seizure.

    My neurologist said the effect of a seizure to the brain is like getting knocked out in boxing. It says in the Wikipedia article that the ECT seizures are stronger than naturally occurring ones and last around 60 seconds, which is pretty long time with a strong seizure. I don't wonder if ECT produces even larger blackouts. Of course, if administered properly, the convulsion-related damage will be minimized, but I do remain suspicious about the side effects.

    --js--

    --
    Usage: km/h for speed (kilometers per hour); kph for very slow impulses (kilopond hours).
  81. Re:CONTEST: What is the oldest piece of "News" on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 1953, Eisenhower was president. If the poor guy's surgery trapped him in a state of thinking, recurrently, that the president remained Truman, he suffered from more than lack of sense of current awareness. The surgery had made him affirmatively ignorant! I understand that he thought, similarly, that Windows was still the best operating system.

  82. O si tacuesses philosophus mansus est by Merdalors · · Score: 1
    OK OK Mr. fussy-pants: Delenda est Carthago. Or maybe Carthaginem esse Delendam. There. I hope you're happy :o)

    Would you believe I was forced to study this for six years? I hated it. I knew less in my sixth year than I did in my fourth. The greek only made things worse. On the other hand, I picked up Spanish in two months. Mucho mas interesante.

    --
    Slashdot entertains. Windows pays the mortgage.
    1. Re:O si tacuesses philosophus mansus est by PakProtector · · Score: 1

      I took it for six years, too. I was just wondering if you were misquoting it on purpose or on accident, say, to say, "Thus the Carthagenians were destroyed," instead of the usual.

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

  83. In terms we geeks understand... by emodeathmachine · · Score: 1

    Athlon FX-60 (He is a frickin genius with those mystery shows)
    7 KB RAM
    Hard Drives set to Read Only.

  84. Re:O si tacuesses philosophus mansus sum by Merdalors · · Score: 1
    Actually, I was alluding to Cato's habit of ending all his speeches, no matter what the subject, with an enjoinder to destroy Rome's rival, the Phoenicians.

    I rant about the silly flaw whereby the bottom half of Slashdot posts on page n are repeated at the top of page n+1. It makes reading the posts a waste of time. I keep going on about it hoping one of the Inner Circle boffins will take notice. It's my monomania.

    Thank you for noticing and setting me strait.

    --
    Slashdot entertains. Windows pays the mortgage.
  85. No... You're wrong AND an asshole. by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
    No... You're wrong AND an asshole. I hope you die of cancer after not smoking all your life. I really do. The world would be a better place without people trying to tell other people how to live.

    The original post about pollution, having to go to work, etc, is incredibly intelligent. If you cannot see that, then the simple conclusion is that you are not.

    Not that I expect you to find ME a credible source of information. But... You are teh suck.

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    1. Re:No... You're wrong AND an asshole. by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      too cowardly to reply in a mature and timely manner.

      Reliable source? i was unaware that the FDA and several other countries equilivents, the AMA, the WHO, and pretty much every respectable medical agency on the planet didn't qualify as reliable sources.

      Wow what amazing things you learn from people who put their own addictions ahead of reality!

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
  86. God you're an asshole by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
    You're clearly 10 times more sensitive on certain subjects, therefore we should spend 10 times our effort making sure not to hurt poor widdle you, huh?

    Go move to the country. You get more pollution from factories and mother nature than you get from cigarettes. One volcanic eruption can put more bad stuff in the air than everything mankind has done in its entire existence. You have no right to clean air if you are in my personal space, and the cigarette smoke is NOT DOING JACK FUCKING SHIT to you if you are out of my personal space (i.e. 50 feet away). Furthermore, the science has been disproven. Go do some reasearch you ignorant fascist. If you were in my house I'd tie you down and force you to smoke, and it would be grand entertainment.

    People like you just want to take away more and more rights. What if it was found out that cotton caused cancer, even if you were 50 feet away from it? (Yes, it's an insane supposition.) People like me would say, "If you don't like cotton, you can leave." People like you would insist that I surrender my underwear before they infringe on your rights.

    Fuck. Why am I even responding? Now people are getting fired for smoking in their own homes on their own time. You are just another increment on the ruler to fascism. You might not believe in the destination, but you are a fucking tool helping fascism happen whether you know it or believe it or not.

    Fired for smoking here.

    P.S. I would gladly murder you to preserve my right to give you cancer.

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    1. Re:God you're an asshole by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      ad hominem, red herring, arg. ad. verecundiam in falicious case, arg. ad baculum, arg. ad ignoratium, false analogy, false dilema

      learn to make an argument before you even attempt to talk to him

      you do not have the right to FORCE ME to inhale your toxing cloud, anything else VALID OR NOT that you claim to be also toxic doesn't excuse you [oh there is another falicy to add to my above list].

      Furthermore the science has NOT be disproven, please come up with a MEDICAL AUTHORITY that supercedes the list of authorities that i stated (let's start with the FDA and AMA).

      You do not have the right to smoke, you have the right to chew, inject, swallow, drink, etc - but not to smoke because smoking creates and aerosol which others can take in against their will

      Smoking is the ABUSE of a right, not a protected exercise of it

      PS: Make sure you know your enemy before you attempt to call them a fascist.

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    2. Re:God you're an asshole by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      You don't seem to understand the concept of negligible. Avoid it and it will be. Nobody else has to cater to your incessant whining and paranoia (Except me, apparantly).

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    3. Re:God you're an asshole by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      You don't seem to understand the following concepts:

      non-threshold toxicant/carcinogen (IE: exposure to 1 particle has measurable detrimental effect)
      PRICINPLE (IE: on principle alone you do not have the right to force me to participate in your habit by it's nommitigable area effects)

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    4. Re:God you're an asshole by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
      And you would actually get mad at someone for allowing 1 particle to get near you. That is the ultimate definition of petty.

      I'm surprised you don't walk around with a Gieger counter or somesuch nonsense. After all, just one alpha particle can cause cancer. And many things emit radiation (fire detectors, etc). Maybe you should outfit yourself with many different kinds of sensors, so that you can detect each and every particle that might harm you?

      Maybe you could wander through airports and public places and force people to stop killing you! Think of how much better we will all be under your oppressive regime! Why, nobody will be able to emit anything.

      Maybe farting should be illegal too? (Yes, I know it's not nearly the same thing as smoking, but it still fits in line with your warped view of reality.)

      Also, no cars should be allowed within 50 feet of any pedestrians. If you use a crosswalk, all traffic should stop until you can get back to your bubble.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    5. Re:God you're an asshole by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      A piece of paper stops alpha and beta radiation, the dead skin cells that make up the surface of your skin stop alpha and beta radiation - perhaps you need to look them [alpha/beta radiation] up again

      blah blah more red herrings, ad hominems and false analogies and then you top it off with

      Yes, I know it's not nearly the same thing as smoking, but it still fits in line with your warped view of reality.

      Stop trying to redefine my view of reality to fit your pathetically weak arguments. By my "view of reality" farting is merely offensive, not toxic.

      Either stop with the logical fallacies and especially the straw man arguments or STFU

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    6. Re:God you're an asshole by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      I like how you think naming logical fallacies has any effect on me whatsoever. Your frustration just further serves to increase my energy level, and I am going to make damn sure to do some extra smoking in public just because of you. You have made the world a smokier place, thank you.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  87. and yet.... I don't smoke. by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

    and yet... I don't smoke. Or rather, I smoke if they are around, but I don't purchase cigarettes. Oh yea, I'm so addicted; I sold my body last night on the streetside for my next fix. (NOTE: This is a parody, I actually enjoy a $200,000 positive net worth COUNTING what I owe on my house.)

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  88. Re:Let's do the time-warp again by smbarbour · · Score: 1

    If you had posted this under the "Shock Therapy" section of the thread, you may have gotten away with it since the movie "Shock Treatment" was the sequel.