Slashdot Mirror


MacBook Pro Batteries Swelling and Failing

JohnnyCakes writes "MacBook Pro batteries are apparently swelling, then failing. MacFixIt has some grotesque pictures of their own swollen MBP battery, which looks like it has suffered an internal explosion. Apple is replacing batteries on a case-by-case basis, but hasn't yet admitted any wide-scale issues."

388 comments

  1. Early stories by 2.7182 · · Score: 3, Funny

    We here a lot of this kind of thing - faulty Mac products. But they don't usually pan out, so why give it much thought ?

    1. Re:Early stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You there these kinds of things? You don't say.

    2. Re:Early stories by Ant+P. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When it's half a dozen faults with a single product, it's hard to ignore.

    3. Re:Early stories by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apple is supposed to represent a great user experience. It's bad enough that the laptops -- any laptop, really -- is hot enough to make you go temporary sterile. An exploding laptop would not make for a good user experience and the continuation of the species.

    4. Re:Early stories by AuMatar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Temporarily sterile?

      If you're single, thats a *feature*.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    5. Re:Early stories by treeves · · Score: 1

      Umm, I think the parent was making a funny.
      Ever see a flick called 2001: A Space Odyssey? Guy in the movie by the name of HAL9000 said something similar.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    6. Re:Early stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least give him credit for "a lot"...

    7. Re:Early stories by treeves · · Score: 1

      Please mod parent up - it's a joke. And you should have your geek license revoked if you don't get it ;-)

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    8. Re:Early stories by IdahoEv · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's a lot of truth to that joke.

      There's a particular anti-hypertension drug (nifedipine.php) that suppresses fertility in men; enough that it could conceivably be used as a contraceptive pill. This has been known for fourteen years, but the drug manufacturer has been suppressing the info and lobbying against research of nifedipine as a contraceptive, afraid that it will hurt sales of the drug as an antihypertensive.

      This kind of baffles me. It's a short-term effect, and do most people really want to have a pregnancy most of the time. I would think that even for married couples the preferred state would be to not have a baby until you make a positive decision that it's time. Then you switch to a different hypertensive for a couple months until you conceive, then switch back. I really would imagine that this is a feature not a bug.

      But everyone seem convinced that men want to have babies all the time, and therefore would feel that anything that temporarily reduces fertility is a bad thing.

      I don't know any guys who feel that way, do you? In my experience, most people are worried about accidental pregnancy a fair amount of the time.

      --
      I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
    9. Re:Early stories by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      What would it take for something to pan out for you?

      I had to have my MBP battery AND motherboard replaced. They returned it with a wiped hard drive. So thoughtful of them.

    10. Re:Early stories by Elemenope · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Irrational fear can be potent, and impotency is a great irrational fear of some men. It is little comfort to most that it is said the effect is temporary, since even if the chance is very slight that that assessment is wrong, who really wants to take that chance with their gonads? It's a bug, not a feature, if it truns out there are unintended long term effects!

      But of course, if everyone in the world were sensible and logical about all things (including their gonads) then the decision to supress the data and hide the contraceptive effect is a bit silly. It is a minor market anti-hypertensive, but hot damn if it were marketed as a male contraceptive, cha-ching! I imagine that market is significantly larger (and the field is pretty much wide open).

      --
      All the techniques ever used to make men moral have been themselves thoroughly immoral... (Nietzsche)
    11. Re:Early stories by Swift2001 · · Score: 1

      What percentage of users? In all my years at MacFixit, I've had the problems described maybe twice.

      It is, however, the first run of the first revision of a new product with a new design and new chip. Problems happen.

    12. Re:Early stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no. Respond to homonym misuse with clever use of other homonym usage, such as: "You where these kinds of things?"

    13. Re:Early stories by bcat24 · · Score: 1

      *Slowly hands in geek license.*

      OK, I just don't get it. Anybody care to explain?

    14. Re:Early stories by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It would be a feature if you're married. Singles, without proper protection, would run into a lot of "bugs" (not the BSOD type either).

    15. Re:Early stories by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Problems shouldn't happen. This is what testing and quality control are supposed to prevent. Unfortunately, problems like this do happen and customers end up paying a premium to become beta testers for companies.

    16. Re:Early stories by iceanfire · · Score: 2, Funny

      as long as it reduces the amount of mac fanboys (due to their inability to reproduce), i love this feature.

    17. Re:Early stories by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      But everyone seem convinced that men want to have babies all the time, and therefore would feel that anything that temporarily reduces fertility is a bad thing. I don't know any guys who feel that way, do you? In my experience, most people are worried about accidental pregnancy a fair amount of the time.

      The problem is that in some cases temporary infertility leads to permanent sterility. In order to sell this drug as a male contraceptive pill they would have to do extremely lengthy and expensive studies to provide that it works as such, and it is not entirely unlikely that they would have to stop selling it in the interim. (The current status could "require" reevaluation.)

      The drug I really want is melanotan, or alpha-MSH. There was an article about it in wired a while back, which prompted me to do additional research. Basically, it was originally intended to do what normal MSH, or Melanocyte Stimulating Hormon does; stimulate melanin production, causing darker skin, and increased resistance to UV. (Melanin is metallic.) It has two side effects; it suppresses appetite, and increases sexual desire. Wired's tagline was "Thin! Tan! Hotter than hell!" Sounds perfect to me. Now I'm just waiting for it to hit the market SOMEWHERE so I can internet-order it :) Unfortunately it's been continually delayed, and the reason given is the sexual appetite improvements. Mind-boggling.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    18. Re:Early stories by treeves · · Score: 1
      2001: A Space Odyssey, one of the top 100 films of all time, has the following lines:
      HAL cannot self-diagnostically detect errors in his own system. The machine refuses to admit the evidence of his own capacity for error. In an unperturbed tone, HAL defends himself to the two astronauts and faults the humans instead for "human error": HAL: I hope the two of you are not concerned about this. Dave: No, I'm not HAL. HAL: Are you quite sure? Dave: Yeah. I'd like to ask you a question, though. HAL: Of course. Dave: How would you account for this discrepancy between you and the twin 9000? HAL: Well, I don't think there is any question about it. It can only be attributable to human error. This sort of thing has cropped up before, and it has always been due to human error. Frank: Listen HAL. There has never been any instance at all of a computer error occurring in the 9000 series, has there? HAL: None whatsoever, Frank. The 9000 series has a perfect operational record. Frank: Well of course I know all the wonderful achievements of the 9000 series, but, uh, are you certain there has never been any case of even the most insignificant computer error? HAL: None whatsoever, Frank. Quite honestly, I wouldn't worry myself about that. Dave: Well, I'm sure you're right, HAL. Uhm, fine, thanks very much.
      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    19. Re:Early stories by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      Laptop batteries are a new product?

      These things are a concept that has been around a long time - but yet, every time Apple/Macs have "first revision" (which they do with startling frequency, to the point where it's a standing joke, "Never buy an Apple 1.0 product"), the apologists come out and say "hey, problems happen", even when, in cases lie in components that have been around for years.

    20. Re:Early stories by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Condoms occasionally break. It's a good idea to have extra protection.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    21. Re:Early stories by jaseparlo · · Score: 1

      It's probably related to the known heat problem in the MBPs, hot batteries expand and eventually blow. Not to excuse the heat problem though, you'd think that considering heat and performance were some of the the reasons they switched, they'd have checked that out. Just saying that it's probably not really a different problem

      --
      All available data suggest that regardless of any of this, the sun will still come up tomorrow.
    22. Re:Early stories by Ucklak · · Score: 1
      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    23. Re:Early stories by shmlco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First, Lithium Polymer batteries are a new technology, so there's bound to be some teething pains. But you're right, no one should release anything until it's absolutely positively beyond-the-shadow-of-a-doubt 100% perfect.

      Of course, since that's impossible, no one would release ever anything. In fact, I hear they're still having problems with the new-fangled round wheel thing...

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    24. Re:Early stories by Chrono11901 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Apple fantics assemble! Defend our faulty over priced products!

    25. Re:Early stories by chicagotypewriter · · Score: 1
      Problems shouldn't happen. This is what testing and quality control are supposed to prevent.

      We say the same thing with software, but accept the reality that some amount of problems are going to happen. How is this any different? (other than the obvious that its hardware and not software)
    26. Re:Early stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes because this problems NEVER happen with other manufacturers products.

    27. Re:Early stories by ketamine-bp · · Score: 1

      True, but

      1. nifedipine is usually prescribed in the aged population, not some 20yo or 30yo.. at least in my area.
      2. nobody can stop your research as to seek if nifedipine (or any other calcium channel blocker, as such) will be very effective (as in hundred MAN years, as opposed to hundred women-year for female contraceptives) in being a male contraceptive, whether its effect are enough to be a drug of choice, is another matter, though.

    28. Re:Early stories by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Speaking as someone who had an incident with a battery expoding / lighting on fire in a [nda] PDA, yeah, a lithium battery can do a lot of damage. I'm not exactly sure what the size of the Lion cell, but it was a lot smaller than a laptop battery and even inside the pda's case, flames leapt out the front panel buttons and lit the shirt I was wearing on fire.
      Fun fun fun!
      I don't use a laptop on my lap without a laptop cooling pad.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    29. Re:Early stories by Cederic · · Score: 1


      Mind-boggling that the authorities don't want additional men to have excessive sexual appetites.

      http://crime.about.com/od/stats/a/ucr_rape.htm

    30. Re:Early stories by Swift2001 · · Score: 1

      Well, if you're the manufacturer -- or really, Foxconn or somebody MAKES everything, Apple is just Design and Quality Control -- and problems are reported, you see how many problems there are, how many machines are affected, what the precise problem is -- bad battery lot, bad fab, design flaw, whatever -- and then respond appropriately. Maybe there's a bad batch somewhere, who knows?

      I'd agree, if you want trouble-free operation, don't buy any version 1.0. Around the second revision, things get reliable. But one or two pictures of fat batteries look bad. Are there eight of them out there, or 800, or 8,000? Frankly, I'd bet around 80.

      Why are there still problems with automobile engines? Are they new products? But people still get lemons, after 100-whatever years.

    31. Re:Early stories by Mr+Tall · · Score: 1

      I fly a model helicopter which uses a lithium polymer battery. It's subjected to some, er, inertial shocks now and again, and is also charged and discharged much harder than a laptop battery. It hasn't swollen up or failed like this, so why should expensive laptop batteries suffer "teething troubles"?

    32. Re:Early stories by Lussarn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      LiPo batteries gets destroyed if they get below aprox 3V per cell, or over 4V something per cell. Your speed controller in the helicopter cuts of before they discharge that much. Apparently something is not right with the cutoff voltage in these computers (possibly). It could also be a charger problem, if it puts to much juice in the cells. These batteries are fragile and should be handled with care, it's not unknown for them to burst out in flames if not taken care of properly by the electronics. So this problem is quite serious.

    33. Re:Early stories by Mr+Tall · · Score: 1

      You're quite correct - except my heli is a cheap chinese job, so it doesn't even have a cutoff for the LiPo, you just stop flying when you notice the revs drop. What I meant to say, and probably didn't make clear in my original post, was that if a cheap "toy" helicopter and a £15 charger can manage to look after a LiPo battery, why on earth can't a really expensive computer? Someone's screwed up somewhere :)

    34. Re:Early stories by blzabub · · Score: 1

      Maybe because your heli doesn't have a Core Duo and a hard drive and a graphics sub system throwing off heat in addition to the battery itself? Also, flying around is a pretty good way of cooling something. Quick somebody patent it: novel method for cooling an electronic device...

    35. Re:Early stories by charon69 · · Score: 1

      This is just a shot in the dark, but what if it's to placate Catholics? I'm not making any moral calls here, but contraceptives are a strict no-no for them from what I understand (IANA Catholic). And, yes, I know that a lot of people secretly ignore said ban, but we're talking official position here. Would a drug whose primary function is not related to reproduction, but which has a side effect that can interfere with the possibility of becoming pregnant, still be considered off limits?

    36. Re:Early stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably related to the known heat problem in the MBPs, hot batteries expand and eventually blow.

      The Manbearpigs? >_>

    37. Re:Early stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You dont rape someone just because you wan to have sex. You have to have almost non existant respect for other human beings as well...

    38. Re:Early stories by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      Dell Laptop Explodes

      Mod parent troll.

    39. Re:Early stories by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

      Whether 'this problems' happens with other equipment is totally irrelevant.

      You're quite right, it shouldn't happen with ANY product. You can't defend Apple on the basis of 'Well, everyone else's does it so it must be OK!'

      'Well Saddam killed a lot of Iraqis to maintain stability! So it MUST be fine for us to do it too!'

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    40. Re:Early stories by Twixter · · Score: 1
      The best male fertility suppressant for me is still baby sitting my Newphew for a few hours.

      -Todd

      You wanna outlaw something obscene? Then outlaw spandex in retirment communtities, not thongs on beaches.

      --

      -Todd

      Put down the sig, and step away from the computer.

    41. Re:Early stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Help me.. seriously.. Monsters

    42. Re:Early stories by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Rape isn't just about sex. It's more about violence and control - sex is simply the way it is expressed, probably in part because we have built rape up as being "worse than death"... but uh, nobody recovers from death at all. (Sometimes people recover from misdiagnosis of death...)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    43. Re:Early stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are confused. Nice of you to take a general saying such as, "never buy a 1.0 version of anything", and then come up with some concocted story about Apple hardware failures and change the saying to apply to that.

      The facts are that Apple has higher quality products with fewer problems, than can been offered on the Wintel side. It's been like that for years and you are quite jealous.

      Just Google for a pc manufacturer like Dell, Gateway etc. and add in hardware failure and take a look at the results.

    44. Re:Early stories by muzthe42nd · · Score: 0

      Because you can't get him pregnant?

      --
      Pfft - Sorry, what?
    45. Re:Early stories by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      Well, the apetite supressant would be fine, and I could live with the increased sex drive, but NO WAY am I taking a drug that makes me look like I have a tan. I'm quite happy being pale.

  2. Bad Mac Users! by Penguin+Programmer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How many times do we have to tell you? Don't buy first-gen Apple hardware!

    1. Re:Bad Mac Users! by posterlogo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Every newly released model (inbetween the major updates) still often has different hardware, sometimes totally different. These "minor" updates include such things as batteries, RAM, etc. So really, even the 2nd gen version of a particular Apple product could have issues, maybe not the same ones. I don't think we can really say more things will be reliable in the next version, as more new things have been added that could break. As with any computer, ya toss the dice, and ya gets what ya gets. If you want a Macbook, get one.

    2. Re:Bad Mac Users! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > How many times do we have to tell you? Don't buy first-gen Apple hardware!

      And for god's sake, don't use it to a webserver hosting pictures described as "grotesque" on the front page of Slashdot!

    3. Re:Bad Mac Users! by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 3, Funny

      I haven't had any problem with my iMac Core Duo since I got it in February.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    4. Re:Bad Mac Users! by noewun · · Score: 5, Funny

      Absolutely. Should be right up there with "don't get involved in a land war in Asia." I've been telling my friends to wait until the second generation. My G5 will last me until the second generation of Intel-powered desktop machines.

      --
      I am a believer of momentum and curves.
    5. Re:Bad Mac Users! by hackstraw · · Score: 5, Funny

      How many times do we have to tell you? Don't buy first-gen Apple hardware!

      Shh. Be quiet. How do you think the errors get found for the 2nd+ gens?

    6. Re:Bad Mac Users! by Pendersempai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I bet if you compared the proportion of users who experienced problems with first generation Apple products, they'd be less than for any competing products on the PC side.

      The hysteria is a combination of (1) Apple users' sometimes obnoxious levels of perfectionism, and (2) Apple's reputation for great customer satisfaction such that each and every flaw is a major news story.

    7. Re:Bad Mac Users! by KoopaTroopa · · Score: 3, Funny

      My Intel iMac (20" version) has also been rock-solid. I love the thing.

      --
      Sharpies don't just sniff themselves.
    8. Re:Bad Mac Users! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, the idea is that the newly released model has different hardware because it is improved and/or a fix to something (like defective batteries) from the rev. before.

    9. Re:Bad Mac Users! by sgant · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, it's only Apple that's having problems like this.

      Good thing some company like Dell doesn't have any problems with swelling in their laptops.

      Hey, check this out! http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=32550

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    10. Re:Bad Mac Users! by maniac/dev/null · · Score: 5, Funny

      Reputation for great customer service my ass! I called their tech support line last week when my IIe stopped reading diskettes, and they said they "don't support legacy platforms"! Kids today, with their iBlogs and their MyDiggs, makes me sick... back in my day, we had to flip the diskettes over to read more information, in the snow, uphill both ways!

    11. Re:Bad Mac Users! by ioErr · · Score: 1
      How many times do we have to tell you? Don't buy first-gen Apple hardware!
      Because people can always afford to wait another x months for a new machine, right? Sometimes a yellowing, battery-swelling, overheating MacBook is better than something with a G4 in it.
    12. Re:Bad Mac Users! by eberzins · · Score: 1
      How many times do we have to tell you? Don't buy first-gen Apple hardware!

      As someone else already mentioned, this probably isn't widespread. Rather than the absolute rule you've suggested, it may be that it only applies to the ultra-compact/portable crop of current Apple machines (books, minis, pods, etc). I ordered a Macintel iMac the day it was made available and 6-months later I've had precisely zero issues with it (--knocks on desk--). Then again, my 2002 PowerBook did have quite a few battery issues, so this may be more a trait of Apple portables in general than new hardware.
    13. Re:Bad Mac Users! by XaXXon · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've had the same experience my my mini core duo.

      Solid as a rock, and about the same size as a nice, interesting one. Not at all like the ones in my bag now, which, come to think of it isn't my bag at all. It's very similar, but it's not mine. Gah! What's with this towel? Pink?!?

      I don't see anything. These battery issues must be SEP.

    14. Re:Bad Mac Users! by XMilkProject · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, the lack of hysteria is due to (1) Apples users' lack of technical knowledge about what to expect from their hardware -- and there should be hysteria given (2) Apple's substantially above average prices that lead consumers to expect quality.

      --
      Big ones, small ones, some as big as yer 'ead!
      Give 'em a twist, a flick o' the wrist...
    15. Re:Bad Mac Users! by heinousjay · · Score: 4, Funny

      And you got modded up for saying so. I love zealotry.

      Hey, I own a Core Duo MacBook Pro. No problems that I'll cop to. Can I have some mod lovin too?

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    16. Re:Bad Mac Users! by GweeDo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Where exactly did you stick the battery in your iMac?

      Oh...there isn't a battery in your desktop?

    17. Re:Bad Mac Users! by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      My G5 will last me until the second generation of Intel-powered desktop machines.

      Unless its coolant leaks first. The best part is its toxic green color. I think I'll stick with my G4 Windtunnel (and its four drive bays) for a bit longer.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    18. Re:Bad Mac Users! by tpv · · Score: 5, Funny

      Was that a first generation IIe?

      --
      Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.
    19. Re:Bad Mac Users! by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thank you, single data point! You always end any argument.

      -Grey

    20. Re:Bad Mac Users! by happyemoticon · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was probably one of the first people in the public to own a new Intel iMac (ordered it like a half an hour after it was up on the website, and it was delivered way ahead of schedule), and I've had no problems other than some improper permissions.

      Conversely, my PowerBook - which was the second-to-last generation, mind you - has had a few problems here and there. I don't give it much of a beating, but I know that the keys start to act funny when it heats up too much.

      My reasoning with electing to be an iMac beta tester^W^Wearly adopter was as follows: The motherboard is essentially a stock intel laptop model. The chasis is identical to the previous iMac revision, meaning that all of those components have a lot of room to breathe and stay pretty cool. The likelihood of the internals doing weird stuff as a function of heat is low, and the screen probably won't break. This is what I regard as an acceptable risk. If you shoved all of those components into a 1" thick aluminum case and integrate an unstable potential energy storage device such as a lithium-ion battery, and then start taking it everywhere with you where it can get hit, kicked around, tenderized, baked, fried and frozen, then things get more complicated. I will admit that the new cord design was ALMOST enough to get me to replace my laptop, however, there were just too many things that could go wrong. Every laptop owner knows this - or should know it.

      The only real rough ride I've had has been getting my hands on Intel-native builds. But I use a lot of OSS, and most of it compiled with minimal tweaking. In the case of Emacs, it compiled perfectly with no tweaking whatsoever. Also, in some cases I was able to start a correspondence with developers and get pre-release universal builds of applications.

    21. Re:Bad Mac Users! by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, exactly. Could you imagine a typical PC user complaining that he can hear the fan running in his PC from "over three feet away". Of course not, noisy PCs are normal but audiable niose from an Apple product causes Apple user's to complain.

    22. Re:Bad Mac Users! by metamatic · · Score: 3, Funny
      Good thing some company like Dell doesn't have any problems with swelling in their laptops.

      I bet more than half the Slashdot readership has problems with swelling in their laptops.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    23. Re:Bad Mac Users! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One *purported* Dell "explosion" (I certainly did not see the emblem clearly on the pictures) pales in comparison to a series of Macs suffering from either swelling/failing batteries or discoloration on the laptop itself.

    24. Re:Bad Mac Users! by bcat24 · · Score: 1

      Well, if he has a UPS...

    25. Re:Bad Mac Users! by twofidyKidd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My 20" Intel iMac has also been rock solid. Guess that makes two data points. In any case, there's been little or no coverage that I've seen regarding problems with those machines. Not that there aren't any problems at all, but they are few, and far between.

      And while this article is regarding batteries, the arguments are regarding first generation products, of which it would appear that the Intel iMacs have had little problems. The sweeping generalization that many people make about the status of quality regarding first generation products, whether they are Apple's, or any other company's products, is wrong.

      --


      Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
    26. Re:Bad Mac Users! by twofidyKidd · · Score: 1

      So far so good...

      --


      Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
    27. Re:Bad Mac Users! by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      Speaking for myself, I was responding to the guy who said never buy first-gen Apple hardware. Well, I did and have never had a problem. Apparently, some wiseguys are taking it as a joke because of no battery in the iMac, but that wasn't the point I was responding to.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    28. Re:Bad Mac Users! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The hysteria is a combination of (1) Apple users' sometimes obnoxious levels of perfectionism,

      Not wanting my laptop's battery to swell and possibly burst means that I'm too much of a perfectionist? Was everybody who got screwed by Shuttle, Epox, and all the other 2nd tier board manufacturers also too much of a perfectionist for wanting them to repair the motherboards (in warranty or not) because a number of capacitors (thanks to a faulty stolen formula) would leak/explode leaving you with a practically new worthless motherboard?

      and (2) Apple's reputation for great customer satisfaction such that each and every flaw is a major news story.

      Some of that is the "Apple can do no wrong" mantra by the Believers. Others will begin to wonder if Apple is truly their friend when their iPod battery dies after a year's heavy usage and Apple wants you to buy a new iPod or fork over your own pristine, sweet iPod for a refurb (at a slightly exhorbitant rate).

    29. Re:Bad Mac Users! by SheldonW · · Score: 1

      There's a difference. Major updates are very secretive and therefore get a very small amount of testing. A minor update such as batteries and new processors already include new formfactors and can therefore have extended testing with no concern of secrecy.

    30. Re:Bad Mac Users! by sgant · · Score: 1

      One *purported* Dell "explosion" (I certainly did not see the emblem clearly on the pictures) pales in comparison to a series of Macs suffering from either swelling/failing batteries or discoloration on the laptop itself.

      True...but taking the two problems in perspective I'll take the swelling and failing over the bursting into flames thing. But that's just me.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    31. Re:Bad Mac Users! by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Good thing some company like Dell doesn't have any problems with swelling in their laptops.

      Hey, check this out! http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=32550


      Of course, since Dell makes so many models of laptops, you can just avoid that model, or even if it affected all Dell laptops you could buy an HP, or a Lenovo, or a Sony.

      Meanwhile Apple only makes two models of laptops, each specially designed for a market segment, and there are no other makers of Mac laptops, so prospective buyers now have to consider putting purchases on hold while Apple gets its ducks in a row.

    32. Re:Bad Mac Users! by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      You're solving the wrong problem. How about Apple actually applies more rigorous quality control? As you said, "How many times do we have to tell you" - this is not the first time, nor will it be the last, but Apple fanboys, the same ones who decry MS, etc, releasing buggy software as "using customers as beta testers" are quite happy to be used as hardware beta testers, even when they get the shaft as a result. Shitty plastic on iPods, logic boards on G3s, overheating and battery issues on MBPs, etc, etc. The list isn't much better than most other manufacturers, but a segment of the populace seems to give them a pass on anything short of genocide.

    33. Re:Bad Mac Users! by skingers6894 · · Score: 1

      After 15 years as an Apple FanBoi buying the latest as soon as Steve brings it down from the mountain top I have NEVER had a problem with their hardware, EVER.

      "Oh sure but your just one guy in Millions!" you might say.

      Indeed, just like these "bad mac" stories.

    34. Re:Bad Mac Users! by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Uh, PRAM batteries?

      Just to be pedantic.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    35. Re:Bad Mac Users! by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      You know, I had a cd eject violently at me once. It had the potential to sting me. I'd better stick to tape decks, so I can avoid this highly unlikely isolated incident in the future.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    36. Re:Bad Mac Users! by nihaopaul · · Score: 1

      i have to agree with parent, mac users are blonde!

    37. Re:Bad Mac Users! by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The DIY PC crowd equilivent to "Don't buy Apple first gen hardware" is something like "Don't buy cheap power supplies". I'm sure most of us can point to some example of a $5 "350W" power supply that has been running solid for years - but that doesn't stop us from telling people not to use them.

    38. Re:Bad Mac Users! by noewun · · Score: 1

      Which is why I'm glad my 1.8 G5 is air cooled. If the air leaks I will just open the window and let it out.

      --
      I am a believer of momentum and curves.
    39. Re:Bad Mac Users! by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Was that a first generation IIe?

      Umm... that was the 2nd generation of Apple. Apple II... DUH.

      The Apple Mac is really the 3rd generation of Apple's stuff. Why anybody cares about buying the "first generation" is beyond me - that stuff hasn't been sold since 1979!

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    40. Re:Bad Mac Users! by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      How many times do we have to tell you? Don't buy first-gen Apple hardware!

      My first-gen 5GB iPod (bought two weeks after they were introduced) is still humming along quite well, thanks.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    41. Re:Bad Mac Users! by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Well, I can safely say my MBP has never became *that* hot. Probably to the point where it could cook meat safely (I've seen about 75c on the internal chip temp readouts), but not quite spontaneous combustion. I can't say that its battery is swelling, but it's become worryingly hot on more than one occasion (one of which being while it was off in my backpack while on a plane). I think it's more a power management issue on the whole rather than just the battery, though, as I've never one heard the fan come on when running OSX (ironically, Windows seems to handle that better by means of BootCamp, when gaming at an equal load to some OSX-based 3d rendering). Which reminds me... I should call Apple about that, as it's well beyond the point of "some surfaces may appear hot" as per their troubleshooting FAQ.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    42. Re:Bad Mac Users! by akhomerun · · Score: 1

      why not buy 1st gen mac products? they DO have a warranty!

    43. Re:Bad Mac Users! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely. Should be right up there with "don't get involved in a land war in Asia."

      You misspelled "middle east."

    44. Re:Bad Mac Users! by Milton+Waddams · · Score: 1

      I think all desktops should have batteries in them. Just a small one that lasts 5 minutes or so so in a power failure, you have time to close all your programs and safely turn the computer off. I know stuff like this already exists. But the battery should come for free.

    45. Re:Bad Mac Users! by KoopaTroopa · · Score: 1

      Like OverlyCriticalGuy I was talking about the first-gen bit. Did that get modded down or something?

      --
      Sharpies don't just sniff themselves.
    46. Re:Bad Mac Users! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it is because Apple releases products not when they are ready, but at MacWorld or WWDC so Steve can show them off, ready or not. This means that corners are cut in engineering and testing to meet the insane schedules so that Steve has a new toy to show off. When Apple releases a product, it barely works and has lousy yields in manufacturing. They spend the next quarter just getting all the bugs out and getting the yields up to acceptable levels.

      Another key contributor to Apple quality issues is that ID runs the show - not electrical engineering, not mechanical engineering, but the look and feel guys who who come up with those nice looking enclosures. They may look elegant, but they cost 10x what anyone else uses and create huge problems for the ME and EE teams who have to pack everything inside them and then try to keep it all cool.

      When I worked in Apple engineering, my brand new power book had to have the motherboard replaced after 4 weeks. I saw management ignoring all reality to meet a schedule date, quality be damned. The engineers who work at Apple are all really smart and work incredibly hard, but (with a very few exceptions) the management don't have the guts to stand up to Steve. So they ship crap, over and over again.

      The advice to never buy a first generation Apple product is unfortunately very sound.

    47. Re:Bad Mac Users! by iabervon · · Score: 1

      Actually, the middle east is about the best part of Asia to get involved in a land war in. You just shouldn't try to occupy it afterwards. In most of the rest of Asia, you'll get wiped out long before you've occupied the territory.

    48. Re:Bad Mac Users! by Dretep · · Score: 0
      I bet more than half the Slashdot readership has problems with swelling in their laptops.
      I'd bet it's not the head in their pants that has problems with swelling but the one on their shoulders...
    49. Re:Bad Mac Users! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/come for free/be included in the price of the computer/

      There's a big difference there.

    50. Re:Bad Mac Users! by tpv · · Score: 1
      Yes, well I wouldn't have been able to karma-whore as well if I cared about the facts. :)
      And as it happens, the IIe was the 3rd computer in the apple II line anyway.

      Why anybody cares about buying the "first generation" is beyond me - that stuff hasn't been sold since 1979!
      Actually I suspect a large number of people here would very particularly eager to get their hands on a first generation apple.
      --
      Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.
    51. Re:Bad Mac Users! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is simply not true. macintouch.com has several reliability surveys they have made at various times. Some macs have like 10% failure rate or better (which isn't too shabby). Others... well, the "Original iMac G5 20" has a 31% failure rate.. "New iMac G5 20" is 11% though.. 1-1.25ghz aluminum 15" Powerbook had a 41% failure rate in the 1st year of ownership.. ouch!

                Mac owners being perfectionists might be good for a few points, but with mini listed with a 3% fault rate, and 8% for a few other machines.. that would tend to suggest you're not getting 25%+ failure because of perfectionism.

  3. Macfixt.com is apparently swelling, then failing. by Stavr0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    /dotted.

  4. To keep up with Dell by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apple's next OS X update will ensure that random MacBooks will explode in a ball of flames. Apple, after all, wants to do everything a PC can do, but better, right?!

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    1. Re:To keep up with Dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they want to do it better then there should definitely be some deadly shrapnel involved. Just wouldn't be fun otherwise.

    2. Re:To keep up with Dell by OmegaBlac · · Score: 1

      Apple has already implemented that feature in their older ibook line of lapt...I mean notebooks ;)

    3. Re:To keep up with Dell by TwoTailedFox · · Score: 1
      Apple's next OS X update will ensure that random MacBooks will explode in a ball of flames. Apple, after all, wants to do everything a PC can do, but better, right?!

      It can start by right-clicking.

      --
      ~The TwoTailedFox posts again....
    4. Re:To keep up with Dell by destiney · · Score: 1


      I use a mac. My mouse has a right click buton, and a wheel, and the wheel even supports middle clicking.

    5. Re:To keep up with Dell by kestasjk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mac- Hello I'm a Mac PC- And I'm a PC Mac- Y'Know I can do a lot of fun stuff like arrange pictures and-- PC- Err what's that huge lump growing out of your side? And why are your clothes covered with yellow stains?

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
  5. Slahdotted already by davidc · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ... at zero comments!

    Looks like MacFixit's server uses one of those batteries :-)

  6. Definitely issues with MacBook Pro batteries by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I currently have the issue where the machine simply turns off when the battery has reached around 30-40%, according to the operating system's battery meter.

    Then, there is the issue of some batteries swelling, slightly to severely. If this is shown to be heat related, it may be also related to the issue of too much thermal paste being applied during manufacturing, thereby not allowing heat to be dissipated properly via the heatpipe and associated fans in a controlled fashion, but rather causing it to be dissipated in an uncontrolled way. Like, discharged into the interior of the case, affecting things like the battery.

    The battery has definitely not suffered an "internal explosion", as the submitter speculates. This appears to occur over time to the batteries that do exhibit this issue, and it is by no means representative of the majority of MacBook Pro batteries. We've got plenty of MacBook Pros here, and we have yet to see one that exhibits this issue in a noticeable way.

    These issues have not yet been acknowledged by Apple. While Apple is actually, from a statistical and reporting standpoint according to consumer organizations like Consumer Reports, the best at responding to these types of problems, it generally does not respond to or acknowledge any problems unless it already has a solution (or there is a defined safety risk that meets the muster of an immediate recall (which this is not (no, really, it's not))).

    When Apple does acknowledge and address the issue, if it is indeed determined to be widespread (and anecdotal blog evidence aside, there is no reason to believe it is), Apple does make it very easy to get a replacement. See the examples for the previous PowerBook and iBook battery exchanges here. Just type in the serial number, Apple sends you a new battery. In this instance, Apple is most definitely replacing batteries that have failed or swollen; so, the end result is that affected customers still get a new battery. And, in the event that there is any larger problem that hasn't been addressed by the battery OEM, if that battery were to fail, it has its own warranty under which it will be replaced as well.

    In any event, further awareness of the problem may adjust Apple's priorities in addressing the heat and battery issues on the MacBook Pro. For the record, with regard to thermal paste, Apple applies this much thermal paste on the new MacBook as well, and in the service manual, they specifically state that it is the correct, intended, and verified amount of thermal paste to be applying (even though that's a ridiculous assertion). So there's obviously more going on there, and anyone who has ever worked in a massive manufacturing operation knows how long a simple procedural change like this can take, and everything else that's involved.

    As an aside, from the level of coverage all of these "issues" receive with Apple products, I can't help but wonder if some people get the impression that Apple just turns out one shoddy product after another, when the reality is that Apple is generally and consistently considered to be the best in the entire industry for quality, need for repairs, technical support, and so on, above all other manufacturers.

    1. Re:Definitely issues with MacBook Pro batteries by Mr.Sharpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My MacBook Pro was exhibiting the same behavior. The OS or hardware seemed to be miscalculating the charge in the battery. I could turn it off, remove the battery and let it sit for a while, then put the battery back in and it would seem to reset SOMETIMES but not always. In the end I had to make the call to Apple support. They sent a replacement battery out to me and things seem to be working better now.

      I feel like my MBP was definitely half-baked on release. Unfortunately, the kind of baking it is doing to itself now is not the solution. Ah, the perils of early adoption.

    2. Re:Definitely issues with MacBook Pro batteries by ah.clem · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your new MacBook Pro is in the mail, along with a complementary gift basket.

      ah.clem

      --
      "Life is not magic." Dr. Ron Weiss - "If we don't play God, who will?" Dr. James Watson
    3. Re:Definitely issues with MacBook Pro batteries by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful
      When Apple does acknowledge and address the issue, if it is indeed determined to be widespread (and anecdotal blog evidence aside, there is no reason to believe it is), Apple does make it very easy to get a replacement.

      Maybe I'm just bitter, but they didn't make it possible for owners of first-gen G3 macintoshes to get a replacement logic board that didn't have a totally fucked IDE host adapter on it.

      I've learned not to trust any companies, and that includes Apple. If you don't have them backed into a corner, you can't expect to even get what you paid for.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Definitely issues with MacBook Pro batteries by Moofie · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Hmm. I didn't seem to have Apple backed into a corner when I broke my iPod (cracked the clickwheel because I bashed it into the corner of a desk while it was in my pocket), and they handed me a new one.

      So, (my anecdote)+(your something like an anecdote)=not much, right?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    5. Re:Definitely issues with MacBook Pro batteries by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Hmm. I didn't seem to have Apple backed into a corner when I broke my iPod (cracked the clickwheel because I bashed it into the corner of a desk while it was in my pocket), and they handed me a new one.

      Actually, mine is not just an anecdote. I first became aware of the problem (I thought it was just me) when I plugged a new hard drive into a G3 and started getting data corruption all over the place. I did a little research and it turned out that the Rev 1 and 2 versions of the motherboard have different EIDE host adapters (different versions of the same CMD chip) and the Rev 1 boards have problems with most hard drives - you can run them fine in PIO mode, but they lose data in UDMA mode. This problem is so widespread that there's actually a couple different tools that will check for the data corruption problem. I found a description of the problem on the lowendmac website.

      Want to hear something even more fucked up? There formerly was an article about this in the Apple KB, but when they moved to their new system, they mysteriously "lost" the article. KB articles with numbers on either side of that particular entry made it into the new support system, but that specific article did not. While I have no evidence that it was intentional, it seems very odd that a most-likely-automated process would lose a specific article that details an error in Apple hardware that they utterly failed to address.

      The really telling part of that article (which was summarized in a couple of different locations I found while trying to deal with this) is that Apple's official recommendation for people affected by this problem was that they should either buy commercial software that puts the drive in PIO mode, or buy a PCI host adapter and plug your UDMA drives into that. I suspect that they deleted the article because telling your customers to go spend money to fix a problem that you really should have caught in testing, before selling the system, makes you look like a bunch of assholes.

      Mind you, Apple isn't the only company that's done this to me. When I got my iPAQ I followed a link on the device to download HP Mobile Printing software. When I got there, I found that HP had discontinued this software; not just support on the software, but they actually had removed the download from the website. Their suggestion to people who needed PDA printing? Spend money on one of the two commercial printing offerings. Assholes.

      In spite of that, I'm getting an HP laptop, but work is paying for it, and it was either the HP, or a Sony Vaio that could be counted on to fail rapidly (the one we already have here developed hardware problems in the first three months) and of course, Sony's driver support once a machine is no longer their latest and greatest is always craptacular. If the choice is between HP and Sony, it's an easy one.

      Incidentally, if you want apple store+iPod anecdotes, someone I know bought a nano at the apple store because they were told that they would get a $50 rebate when they got home, it was allegedly on the apple website. They went home with the thing, checked the website; no rebate. The device went bad about a week later; they went into the store, and the device ended up being shipped back for repair, for which they had to wait. These people will never visit an apple store again, for obvious reasons. I'll probably never buy something from an apple store, either, but mostly that's because I don't want to pay for the overhead on an ostentatious retail outlet.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Definitely issues with MacBook Pro batteries by easter1916 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is quite contrary to my experience over 5 years with three different laptops from Apple. The most recent incident; was using my MBP 2.0GHz one Saturday a couple of months after I bought it, and the airport died, then disappeared! About this Mac said none was installed... uh-oh. Then the same happened to the audio hardware. So I took it to the Genius Bar at the West County Mall in Des Peres, MO, the "genius" poked around with it, booted from an external drive, etc. No avail, service required, so he took my details and my MBP.

      I was contacted a few days later by Apple to inform me that the failure was due to spill damage... I was ticked. I knew I hadn't spilled anything on it, and I live alone (no kids, separated), and I RARELY have people over and hadn't since the Mac was bought. I escalated the complaint to Customer Relations, and they emailed me photos of the spill damage. I argued that that could have happened while it was in their custody, they held fast to their position. I asked how much the repairs would cost... just shy of $1000. I asked if they could do anything to reduce the cost, and the CR lady agreed to charge me 66% of the repair. I wasn't happy, but what can you do? I needed the machine back.

      I got my machine back this Monday. They had replaced the lower case, the upper case, the keyboard, the inverter, the main logic board and sundry sensors. Basically, a brand-new machine, containing a few of the parts from my MBP... why do many parts replaced? Then I noticed that they said it was a covered repair, meaning I don't pay -- and they haven't charged my card.

      I am guessing that upon further investigation / tech work, they found that the spill damage was just a small part of a bigger issue, and replaced all of the bad parts, and accepted that it was a warranty issue... they could still have charged me the agreed-upon $650, but didn't, even though I would have been none the wiser.

      That restored my faith in Apple. And it's consistent with previous interactions with AppleCare.

    7. Re:Definitely issues with MacBook Pro batteries by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      I currently have the issue [zdnet.com] where the machine simply turns off when the battery has reached around 30-40%, according to the operating system's battery meter.

      That's probably "just" your battery dying prematurely. When I noticed that happening to my Pismo in late 2001, just as the warranty was expiring, it had reached the point where its battery went straight from 75% to 1%. A spare battery purchased later also died in a similar way, and a third battery from BTI refuses to charge more than 15-30%. I got Applecare with the 17" G4 that replaced it, and its battery (and the spare I bought when it was new) seem to be doing fine, though I don't normally operate off-grid below the 50% point.

      (crossing my fingers as I'm about to get an MBP17 in the next week or two)

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    8. Re:Definitely issues with MacBook Pro batteries by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Definitely issues with MacBook Pro batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't be suprised if there was a class-action lawsuit related to your G3 Mac. Apple sometimes goes into cover-up mode rather than do the obvious fix (sending a PCI card to people who complain).

    10. Re:Definitely issues with MacBook Pro batteries by Damvan · · Score: 1

      " I'll probably never buy something from an apple store, either, but mostly that's because I don't want to pay for the overhead on an ostentatious retail outlet."

      That's funny considering the prices at the "ostentatious retail outlet" Apple store are identical to those at the online Apple store.

    11. Re:Definitely issues with MacBook Pro batteries by not_anne · · Score: 1

      All bitterness aside, I'm sure the article you speak of was archived, not deleted.

      FYI: It's true that Apple frontline support does not take care of the G3s anymore, but the Applecare Legacy group does.

      --
      My comments here are my own; I do not speak for my employer.
    12. Re:Definitely issues with MacBook Pro batteries by Confuzzled · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Incidentally, if you want apple store+iPod anecdotes, someone I know bought a nano at the apple store because they were told that they would get a $50 rebate when they got home, it was allegedly on the apple website.


      I call bullshit on this. The only rebate on the iPods is the back to school sale (going on now). There hasn't been any other rebate on the nano since it came out.

      Additionally, when an iPod needs replacement in the Apple Store, we have them on hand and simply give you a new one. The only time you have to wait, is when we don't have the part on hand. In that case we order a new part and you come back _with the nano_ to get a replacement (aka we don't send anything out).
    13. Re:Definitely issues with MacBook Pro batteries by Swift2001 · · Score: 1

      I saw one tech writer who actually tried this on his MacBook, and the temperature lowered 2 degrees. Hardly worth a conniption over. Also, some of the extreme cases, at least, were a simple manufacturing error, where a plastic film was left over a vent in some units. Remove the plastic, remove the excess heat.

      I've got to say, over at digg, the degree of positive stories about Apple makes even me cringe at times. But here on Slashdot there is an unending parade of exaggerated negativity about the company entirely. People have to learn how to make judgments, and not be ruled by their hatred of all things Jobsian. You don't have to like it, but when you see the negativity chorus at work, it's not entirely clear what's motivating them.

    14. Re:Definitely issues with MacBook Pro batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue is a lot older than the MacBook. Cutting power altogether or letting the battery run down all the way sometimes seems to reset the battery controller and 'recalibrate' the max. charge to a sane value.

      This is almost always the sign of a dying battery, so getting a replacement will mostly fix it.

    15. Re:Definitely issues with MacBook Pro batteries by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      All bitterness aside, I'm sure the article you speak of was archived, not deleted.

      Wrongo! Older KB articles can be found (or could then anyway) in the apple support database.

      Pure coverup. Or attempt thereof, because if you google around, you can find info on it anyway.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:Definitely issues with MacBook Pro batteries by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      I'll probably never buy something from an apple store, either, but mostly that's because I don't want to pay for the overhead on an ostentatious retail outlet.
      That's funny considering the prices at the "ostentatious retail outlet" Apple store are identical to those at the online Apple store.

      Yes, the funny part is that people like you don't realize that the prices on the Apple store are also subsidizing the overhead on the Apple store.

      Mac zealots are fun to watch.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:Definitely issues with MacBook Pro batteries by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Incidentally, if you want apple store+iPod anecdotes, someone I know bought a nano at the apple store because they were told that they would get a $50 rebate when they got home, it was allegedly on the apple website.
      I call bullshit on this. The only rebate on the iPods is the back to school sale (going on now). There hasn't been any other rebate on the nano since it came out.

      Ever hear of human error? I said they were told they would get a rebate. Not that there was a rebate. Your Mac zealotry is interfering with your reading comprehension.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    18. Re:Definitely issues with MacBook Pro batteries by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "Yes, the funny part is that people like you don't realize that the prices on the Apple store are also subsidizing the overhead on the Apple store."

      This just doesn't make any sense. Apple did a cost-benefit analysis on starting a retail operation, and obviously somebody with an MBA figured they could move more product. Right, wrong, or indifferent, it seems to be working OK for them.

      If you don't want to buy Apple products, great. But saying you don't want to buy them because they operate a retail store is pretty silly. I suppose you don't buy any store-branded products at other retail establishments either, do you? Because that would be, somehow, ostentatious.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    19. Re:Definitely issues with MacBook Pro batteries by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Apple did a cost-benefit analysis on starting a retail operation, and obviously somebody with an MBA figured they could move more product. Right, wrong, or indifferent, it seems to be working OK for them.

      That's nice. I don't give a fuck if it works OK for them. I want it to work for me.

      There's a big difference between a best buy and an apple store. A much higher percentage of the apple products is overhead.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    20. Re:Definitely issues with MacBook Pro batteries by Moofie · · Score: 1

      OK, so you think that Apple products don't give you an adequate return on your investment. Good for you.

      If you like shopping at big box stores, that's great. I don't. The Apple Store happens to be convenient for me, and I find the prices reasonable for the value returned. I also happen to have gotten superb customer service.

      Have you ever heard of somebody getting superb customer service at a Best Buy?

      "A much higher percentage of the apple products is overhead."

      And R&D, and design. I think it's worth it. You don't. Go free market.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    21. Re:Definitely issues with MacBook Pro batteries by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Have you ever heard of somebody getting superb customer service at a Best Buy?

      Yep. Like me. I go in, I say "this thing is broken" and they give me another one with very little argument.

      Meanwhile, my coworker got fucked around (though not over) on iPod nano replacement at an Apple store.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    22. Re:Definitely issues with MacBook Pro batteries by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Huh. I have exactly the opposite experience. Again: Yay free market.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    23. Re:Definitely issues with MacBook Pro batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every hear of your friend lying to you to vent their Apple frustration? Or ever listen to yourself? Did Steve Jobs kick your dog or something when you were a kid? I realize there are a lot of people out there who take the Apple Fanboyism way too far, but I don't get the deal with the rabid Apple haters.

  7. Apple are shysters! by Threni · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the UK Apple have as good as told people not to buy iPods because they only last one year (despite UK consumer legislation protecting purchases for up to 6 years).

    http://money.guardian.co.uk/consumernews/story/0,, 1783814,00.html
    http://money.guardian.co.uk/howtocomplain/story/0, ,1738830,00.html

    Now it's apparantly not just iPod batteries causing problems! Very amusing.

    1. Re:Apple are shysters! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      In the UK Apple have as good as told people not to buy iPods because they only last one year (despite UK consumer legislation protecting purchases for up to 6 years).

      How do you legislate a portable hard drive that can take 6 years of abuse?

      My iPod is 4 years old now and still works fine. I put in a new battery from NewerTech and it has double the battery life it did when it was new. I try to be careful with it.

      Get a Nano if you want to smack an iPod around.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:Apple are shysters! by DaSenator · · Score: 1

      I'll probably be modded down for saying this, but the 4th Generation 40 GB iPod was a very faulty model. It just seems to me that Apple is losing their focus on caring for customers. Instead of actually focusing on delivering a good quality product, they're falling into the all too common business model of "We're a monopoly on our hardware and software working together, let's charge an arm and a leg for inferior products and refuse to acknowledge that we don't focus on quality control." Apparently, 'AppleCare' is nothing more than a misnomer now.

      And people still call me crazy when I tell them I'm on my ninth (soon to be last) iPod.

      --
      Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.
    3. Re:Apple are shysters! by DaSenator · · Score: 1

      The opening comment was referring to the links from the parent post concerning my iPod woes. The rest of the text is pertaining to the story itself.

      --
      Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.
    4. Re:Apple are shysters! by Kittyflipping · · Score: 1

      "Apple have as good as told people not to buy iPods because they only last one year"

      I have a Creative Zen Micro, and the touch pad for navigation wore out in about a year with moderate use. I'm betting the average iPod lasts longer than that, but if not, I doubt it something to blame only Apple for.

    5. Re:Apple are shysters! by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      How do you legislate a portable hard drive that can take 6 years of abuse?

      You don't. You legislate that expensive portable devices should take six years of abuse. Apple decides what to put in the device, and what to sell in the UK. That's their decision. If that means they don't sell the hard disk-based iPod in the UK, so be it.

      My iPod is 4 years old now and still works fine. I put in a new battery from NewerTech and it has double the battery life it did when it was new. I try to be careful with it.

      That's nice. For the non-geeks among us, the battery problem is still a serious one. I personally plan to buy an iPod and only use it in the car, as a CD changer, where battery life is irrelevant.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Apple are shysters! by aslate · · Score: 1

      You don't. You legislate that expensive portable devices should take six years of abuse. Apple decides what to put in the device, and what to sell in the UK. That's their decision. If that means they don't sell the hard disk-based iPod in the UK, so be it.

      Really? The only bit of relevant UK legislation is that the device should last a reasonable amount of time for the type of device. Even if a PC company only offered a 1 month warantee, you should be able to claim on the fact that is not a reasonable lifetime for a PC. It's not specifically clear legislation, but it exists. I don't know where the 6 year figure comes from though.

    7. Re:Apple are shysters! by dal20402 · · Score: 1

      You legislate that expensive portable devices should take six years of abuse.

      Wow, it feels odd to take the OMGZ0RZ REGOOL4SHUN SUX!1 position, but in this case I have to. Cheap consumer devices are one of the few areas where a mostly unregulated market (only regulated to prevent fire, lethal electric shock, etc.) has proven time and again that it achieves the best results for consumers.

      Not everyone wants to pay big extra dough for a device (or, in this case, perhaps not obtain the device at all, due to the lack of 1.8" HDs and batteries that can take 6 years of abuse) just because some {bureaucrat,legislative_body} arbitrarily decided that device ought to last six years.

      I think most people know that a US$300 consumer device that gets bumped, dropped, joggled, and scratched every day isn't going to last for six years. For those who don't know that, Apple's well-documented one-year warranty should provide a clue. And most of those consumers will want a new device long before the six-year period is up, regardless of whether their original device still works, so they can have the cool new thing. I know I've never kept an iPod for more than two years. Hell, I only kept a *Mac* for six years once, although they've all worked just fine when I sold them/gave them away.

      As for the batteries, how do you propose that Apple solves the problem? There isn't some magic battery technology out there that lasts forever. NiCad and NiMH batteries suffer memory effects. LiIon and its descendants only function over a limited number of cycles. Making the battery removable would have the side effect of making the iPod bigger and more fragile. Now maybe Apple should document the issue better, but I'm not sure what engineering changes you would have it make.

    8. Re:Apple are shysters! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Well, the specific text seems to be "up to" six years, but it's supposed to be based on both the type of device and the cost. Apple's device costs substantially more than competitors' devices, and does not do substantially more, convenient interface notwithstanding.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Apple are shysters! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      You don't. You legislate that expensive portable devices should take six years of abuse. Apple decides what to put in the device, and what to sell in the UK. That's their decision. If that means they don't sell the hard disk-based iPod in the UK, so be it.

      OK, I guess it's a matter not of iPods but whether one favors the nanny-government approach. Hard drives have a G-force rating and that's not likely to change. So according to your theory UK citizens may never own hard drive-based portable devices. I don't accept that the citizenry would be better off with this restriction.

      That's nice. For the non-geeks among us, the battery problem is still a serious one.

      I don't understand the 'non-geeks' bit. Is replacing a battery too hard for most people? The $30 battery I got came with a 1-page instruction sheet and a little plastic lever for popping the back off the case. From there it was a simple unplug-replug. Easier than changing a 9V battery even, as the polarity is uniquely keyed. I'm pretty sure my grandmother could have done the job. It's about fifty times easier than replacing a belt on a vacuumm cleaner.

      Or one could legislate that companies can't sell products with batteries that oxidize their cells. Errr, I mean batteries that have a full-range charge cycle for six years.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    10. Re:Apple are shysters! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      OK, I guess it's a matter not of iPods but whether one favors the nanny-government approach.

      Actually, in this case, it's a law already on the books. I live in the USA and we have no such law anyway, and I don't feel the less for it. I typically wait quite a while before buying anything, both because it's cheaper and because it gives time to iron out issues.

      What I want to know is why Apple isn't getting smacked down under this law, which already exists - or why the law isn't being struck down, if the people don't want it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Apple are shysters! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Or one could legislate that companies can't sell products with batteries that oxidize their cells. Errr, I mean batteries that have a full-range charge cycle for six years.

      Well, I agree that legislating something like that may be a mistake, I'm just bringing it up because it's on the books already, basically. But, there IS a reasonable middle ground... How about legislating that companies can't void your warranty for replacing parts that are known to wear out? You can change your own oil without voiding your automobile's warranty. Why should an iPod be any different?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Apple are shysters! by Damvan · · Score: 1

      Just curious, but which competitors' device holds 60 gigs and costs "substantially" less than an Ipod? I want one!

    13. Re:Apple are shysters! by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1


      What I want to know is why Apple isn't getting smacked down under this law, which already exists - or why the law isn't being struck down, if the people don't want it.


      Because in general, Brits don't give a shit about laws like that, and they're more reasonable than Yanks over what they expect. I flicked through my Yellow pages today (got to buy an AC unit, it was 98 degrees in the house at 11:00 last night), and there is an entire section coloured orange for lawyers - it's about 10% of the thickness of the book - *way* larger than any other coloured section.

      This is a reflection on attitude. In the UK, you push your luck with something, it fails, you say "oh well, I was pushing my luck". In the US, you sue because there wasn't an explicit statement that you couldn't do X with Y (whatever X and Y are). Depending on *just* how ridiculous your position is, you may well win.

      And, yes, the poster-case is the stupid woman who put a cup of boiling water between her thighs in a moving vehicle. Irrespective of *any* overheating claims, it was a bloody stupid thing to do, and she shouldn't have won that case. I'd like to say that in the UK she'd have been thrown out of court, or no lawyer would have taken the case, but unfortunately we're beginning to suffer from the same disease as the US [sigh].

      Sorry, guys, but it's a screwed-up system when lawyers make up 10% of your communities business...

      Simon.

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    14. Re:Apple are shysters! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I wonder if cameras are covered under the same rules. It's high-tech, portable, a luxury, all like the iPOd. And a good SLR hates being dropped.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    15. Re:Apple are shysters! by breser · · Score: 1

      Too bad you're completely misrepresenting the McDonalds case. Let's review a few facts.

      First of all the coffee was being served at 180-190 degrees (as per corporate policy) and was unfit for human consumption. McDonalds admitted this at the trial. She received third degree burns on her thighs and genitals, there's absolutely no way you can expect someone to consume coffee so hot as to give you third degree burns.

      Second McDonalds had received numerous complaints about the temperture of their coffee, including many other people who had received severe burns. All of this over a 10 year period and yet they did nothing about it. They didn't turn down the temperature of their coffee or warn their customers about this issue. At trial they admitted that they didn't even have any plans to consider turning down the temperature of their coffee.

      Finally, they tried to settle for just the cost of her medical bils but McDonalds refused. The final judgement against McDonalds was reduced by 20% to cover the womans neglegence in handling of the coffee.

      This often cited case is often cited without any of the facts that explain just exactly what happened. The case would never have happened had McDonalds done the responsible thing in the first place and turned the temperature of their coffee down to a safe level. Fact is McDonalds turned their coffee temperature down as a result of this case. I'd say the law worked for the people. It forced a corporation to fix the problem or face more law suits with large verdicts against them. McDonalds coffee is now served at 150 degrees.

    16. Re:Apple are shysters! by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

      I think you're missing my point.

      Would you fashion a noose of razor-wire, and place it around your neck while you were driving ? No ? Then why place a cup of boiling water between your thighs ?

      A quick search on the web reveals that coffee is supposed to be that hot (or at least within the range that MacDonalds were serving it). I still have no sympathy for stupidity, and even less so for a legal system that propogates it.

      The correct response to "the coffee between my thighs has just scalded me" is "I shouldn't have put the coffee there", not "they shouldn't be serving a hot drink hot enough to scald me if I do something stupid with it". But the collective denial of responsibility endemic within (particularly) US society doesn't allow for self-blame - it's always someone else's fault...

      Simon

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    17. Re:Apple are shysters! by breser · · Score: 1

      Read your links again. Neither of them say serving temperature should be 190 degrees. The second link you give is about brewing temperature not serving temperature. It's also useful to point out that for every degree increase in temperature skin burns twice as fast. Given that McDonalds sells its coffee to customers who are often consuming it in a car or at least carrying it in one, is not selling gourmet coffee that needs to be super hot to experience the flavor.... I have to think that 190 degrees (5 degrees over the highest of the range on the bunnomatic site you gave) is a bit ridiculous. Especially when you figure that means it'll burn you 10 times as fast as 185 degree coffee.

      Ultimately, what you're forgetting is that the womans mistake was a small one time incidental accident. McDonalds knew about the risks yet continued to serve their coffee at that temperature. I don't think any reasonable person would expect coffee to be served so hot as to achieve 3rd degree burns in 2-7 seconds. So while the woman does share some of the blame I don't think she shoulders all of it and the court verdict represented that (holding the woman 20% responsible for the accident).

      Here's an example. A man sits in the middle of the road. Another individual comes along in his car and runs over the man sitting in the road, seriously injuring but not killing the man sitting in the middle of the road. Both of those individuals actions and choices lead to the injury. Would it surprise you to learn that the man driving the car would be held responsible for his actions, despite the man sitting in the middle of the road doing something completely stupid?

      I don't disagree that their is a lack of personal responsiblity in American society, but I don't feel the McDonalds case is a poster perfect example of that. Which is why almost all of the facts of the case are left out and it's reduced down to woman spills coffee on her self and sues McDonalds. Which of course sounds outrageous.

      Of course corporations in this country want tort reform and the McDonalds case is a very easy one t point to in order to stir up public outrage over current tort law. Like I said above it's very easy to make it sound outrageous and to diminish the publics confidence in our justice system and juries.

    18. Re:Apple are shysters! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      The correct response to "the coffee between my thighs has just scalded me" is "I shouldn't have put the coffee there", not "they shouldn't be serving a hot drink hot enough to scald me if I do something stupid with it".

      The funny thing about this, the item that the parent commenter did not share with you is that McDonalds' own regulations about coffee serving temperature say that it should be lower. Want to know why? Because McDonalds already knows that when the temperature is that high, the cup deforms more easily than normal.

      McDonalds sold coffee that was over the standard serving temperature, and which was over the temperature that their own printed regulations specify. It degraded the structural integrity of the cup to the point where it did not behave as a cup ought. The woman won damages not because the legal system is fucked up (it is, but that's a separate conversation) but because this McDonalds was willfully negligent.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:Apple are shysters! by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

      I think we're going to have to agree to disagree over this one.

      You see, I *did* know all the facts you put forward, and I *still* think the case is ridiculous. I dunno - maybe it's just me. I *expect* my coffee to be boiling hot (it's almost certainly ~100 degrees when I make it myself). Don't get me wrong about not having sympathy for the woman's injuries - anyone with any compassion would feel for her regarding the burns, but I have no sympathy for her subsequent actions. None.

      The case you put for the driver of the car doesn't really fit, in that case the driver of a car has a duty of care to other road users, especially pedestrian ones. Coffee vendors should have the right to expect that customers purchasing a hot drink understand the concept of 'hot'. I doubt she'd try to swallow it in a single gulp (because it'd burn her throat), why then would she expect to be able to pour it over other areas of her body ? After all, if the vendor is at fault, it must be that she should *expect* to be able to do that without injury...

      But hell, the courts sided with your position, as did most of the press as far as I could tell. I'm just a lone voice, crying in the wilderness :-)

      Simon

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
  8. oh dear by celardore · · Score: 1

    The article won't load already.
    This can't have happened to that many people though. Faults do happen. Sure, the fault is annoying and probably dangerous. There are more dangerous faults out there though.

  9. Swelling and Failing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Damn Viagara!!!!!!!

  10. You must be new here. QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Apple is replacing batteries on a case-by-case basis, but hasn't yet admitted any wide-scale issues.

    When has Apple EVER admitted to any wide-scale issues? They're notorious for sweeping problems under the rug and downplaying them. Only after people kick and scream with pitchforks do they grudingly admit to a "limited" problem, and sometimes they don't admit to it all but just quietly do away with the product (e.g., the cube Mac with the cracking case).

    1. Re:You must be new here. QWZX by LnxAddct · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Bullshit. Whenever there is a *wide-scale* issue, Apple responds very quickly. You just go to their site, enter your serial number and they send you whatever you need. This battery issue is *not* a wide-scale problem. The problem with the internet is that one or two blogs can grab the attention of the world, but no one is taking into account the vast majority of the notebooks that aren't having an issue. Hardware defect rates are standard around 3%, Microsoft's XBox 360 release initially was as high as 5% on some runs, Apple's has consistently been around or below 1%, which is unheard of. Seriously, these issues that a blogger brings up now and then are nothing major. Go to an Apple store sometime in the evening and see how many laptops are having any trouble, then keep in mind that they have been on all day, and are on everyday for hours at a time.
      Regards,
      Steve

    2. Re:You must be new here. QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The laptops in the Apple stores don't have batteries installed. If you unplug the power cord, they die.

    3. Re:You must be new here. QWZX by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Bullshit. Whenever there is a *wide-scale* issue, Apple responds very quickly.

      Yes, they tell you to fuck off very quickly. Ever hear of a UDMA data corruption issue with the Revision 1 B&W G3?

      The Rev. 2 b&w G3 uses a different motherboard, has an additional drive bracket, incorporates a new IDE controller chip (marked 402), and includes a faster version of the ATI Rage 128 video card. 350 MHz and 400 MHz models may have either motherboard; 450 MHz and faster versions always have the Rev. 2 board from the factory. The new IDE controller improves slave drive support and solves a drive corruption problem.

      When buying a blue & white G3, insist on getting a Revision 2 system. The best way to make sure you're getting a Rev. 2 motherboard is the "402" marking on the CMD646 IDE controller chip. See Accelerate Your Mac! for more details on differences between these motherboard revisions.

      And here is the page on Acclerate Your Mac! that lets you download the data corruption test tool.

      Ah, finally! I found the page that talks about the data corruption problem in the first place. There's also a page on B&W G3 problems in general, but it's not as interesting.

      Apple's solution (they pulled this article from the KB when they moved their old pages to the new support pages) was to either buy FWB Toolkit and install a driver that will put the drive in PIO mode, which costs you significant CPU time and reduces throughput, or to buy an add-in IDE host adapter card and hook your UDMA drives up to that.

      You can trust Apple all you want, but I think that makes you an idiot. After they fucked over early adopters of the bondi blue G3, then they hid the evidence!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:You must be new here. QWZX by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      Yes, they tell you to fuck off very quickly. Ever hear of a UDMA data corruption issue with the Revision 1 B&W G3?

      Because of course a seven-year old model is a useful example of Apple in 2006. Does your Mac also take 17 minutes to copy a file? These days you can just open it up and look for the 402 chip before you spend $50 on one.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    5. Re:You must be new here. QWZX by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Because of course a seven-year old model is a useful example of Apple in 2006. Does your Mac also take 17 minutes to copy a file? These days you can just open it up and look for the 402 chip before you spend $50 on one.

      These days I know better than to invest in Apple hardware, and I bypass the entire issue. But do you really think that Apple has changed its stripes in the interim? (Jokes about going from the rainbow apple to the grey apple are already anticipated.) Especially since they buried the evidence?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:You must be new here. QWZX by apflwr3 · · Score: 1

      A few months ago someone posted a blog about a Magsafe power adaptor that caught fire. It made the rounds of all the blogs and tech sites. There was wild speculation on the blogs and tech sites, wild exchanges of Apple horror stories and a call for Apple to make a formal declaration and fix the problem. Thing is, it was an isolated incident-- Apple gave the guy a new machine and remained mum, and there have been no similar reports since.

      Like any other company that sells millions of units Apple has to protect their own hides. If a problem turns out to be widespread they have to figure out a way to fix it effectively, efficiently and (of course) with minimal expense. If a problem surfaces with a small number of machines they have to repair those and do damage control to keep tens or hundreds of thousands of Mac owners who don't have problems from bombarding their service lines and repair centers who want their machines fixed "just in case", or who think they're seeing signs of problems that just aren't there (just like when a disease is in the news, large numbers of perfectly healthy people think they have the symptoms.)

      And when there clearly is a problem, Apple is going to protect their own corporate hides. Here's one of those trademark Slashdot car analogies: Let's say you back into another car in the parking lot and it's clearly your fault. Do you admit blame right away (leaving yourself liable for whatever they demand, including back problems ten years later) or do you exchange insurance information and let them work out a fair settlement? Any sane person would do the latter, and any corporation has an obligation (for the shareholders, as well as their own survival) to wait for the facts come in before they make an official declaration of fault and a plan of attack to fix the issue.

      Apple's as good as, if not better than other companies with regards to recalls and repair programs (and again, I don't believe you understand the ramifications of putting such programs into place.) Compared to most other manufacturers they're very good about fixing problems and even giving you a new machine if yours is faulty (sometimes it takes being a "squeaky wheel", but that has as much to do with the actual human you're dealing with as anything.) But really, in the end what people who make comments like yours have to realize that all that really matters is, if the machine YOU own has an issue while under warranty or Applecare it will in almost every case be taken care of in a fair manner.

    7. Re:You must be new here. QWZX by mkiwi · · Score: 1
      The problem with the internet is that one or two blogs can grab the attention of the world, but no one is taking into account the vast majority of the notebooks that aren't having an issue.


      Don't you mean: "The problem with the Internet is that one or two blogs can grab the attention of slashdot...."?? :)

    8. Re:You must be new here. QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That is not true, sorry. They have batteries that are glued in tight.

    9. Re:You must be new here. QWZX by k_187 · · Score: 2, Informative

      nope, tried that out last week. unplugged it, 3 hours 25 minutes on the battery. Granted that might vary from store to store, but it isn't the case in my experience.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    10. Re:You must be new here. QWZX by Confuzzled · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The laptops in the Apple stores don't have batteries installed. If you unplug the power cord, they die.


        Bullshit. Every notebook has a battery installed, this way we can show off the magsafe connector.

  11. Mac Support Thread by Target+Practice · · Score: 1

    Just a link to some of the drama, in case a Google search be beyond ye... I would consider this a problem, judging by the amount of posts there. For once, I'm glad I own neither a Dell or an Apple laptop. Oh wait. I'm always glad I don't own one of those :)

    --
    There's a 68.71% chance you're right.
    1. Re:Mac Support Thread by Americano · · Score: 1
      Just a link to some of the drama, in case a Google search be beyond ye... I would consider this a problem, judging by the amount of posts there.

      In any manufacturing operation, some bad units will be turned out. Sometimes people get unlucky and get the bad unit. I took a look at the link you posted... and I'm wondering how 31 unique posters -- some of whom are simply providing advice, not reporting a swollen battery -- is indicative of some sort of wide-spread quality issue?
  12. Does /. have it in for Apple? by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've read /., on and off for years. Never have I seen so many articles about the (alleged) shortcomings of a single product (aside from Windows, but that's a given.)

    It seems like every other day an article gets posted about a Mac product failing. Whether it's overheating, poor battery life, dirty cases, and now swelling batteries.

    Seriously, what percentage of *any* product fails? Yet it's blown all out of shape here.

    I'm not a Mac owner, nor do I even like their OS, but hell guys, lighten up huh?

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    1. Re:Does /. have it in for Apple? by fullphaser · · Score: 1

      Remeber that on /. all OS's and their respective manufactuer's aren't quite good enough, we are all waiting for some mysterious super OS and manufactuer that will create for us an unbreakable machine, until then any oppertunity to make fun of the competion to the Super OS (Bundled with DNF) will be promptly torn apart.

      Well I guess this gets rid of my ideas of buying a MBP any time soon

      --
      Did someone say cake?
    2. Re:Does /. have it in for Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problems seem to all be Intel Macs. It helps Apple sell their PowerPC machines in any case.

    3. Re:Does /. have it in for Apple? by bsartist · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It works like this:
      1. Write inflammatory Mac-related story.
      2. Hordes of Mac fans visit the site to post angry comments.
      3. Hordes of Mac bashers visit the site to post "I told you so" comments.
      4. Profit.
      See also: Any Mac-related article written by John C. Dvorak.
      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
    4. Re:Does /. have it in for Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the MacBook "mooing" issue a few people are having.
      Thread
      MP3
      Video

    5. Re:Does /. have it in for Apple? by Blob+Pet · · Score: 1

      Probably not. I'm fairly certain that Taco and a few other of the editors own Apple notebooks... only because that's what I saw them use at LinuxWorld.

      --
      "...today consumers have been conditioned to think of beer when they see a bullfrog..."
    6. Re:Does /. have it in for Apple? by bsartist · · Score: 1
      Don't forget the MacBook "mooing" issue a few people are having.
      I guess that pretty much settles the question of whether Clarus is a dog or a cow.
      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
    7. Re:Does /. have it in for Apple? by Stalyn · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No it's your own selective perception. Maybe 1 out the last 10 were negative. Now... Microsoft... that's another story.

      --
      The best education consists in immunizing people against systematic attempts at education. - Paul Feyerabend
    8. Re:Does /. have it in for Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You have to be a plant from Apple to make a comment like that.

      Hardly any other site that's not solely focused on Apple is as pro-Apple as Slashdot.

      I've had comments modded down so often for even hinting that something could be wrong with Apple's strategy from time to time. Basically, either you're new around here and don't yet understand the nature of the site, or you're on Apple's pay roll.

    9. Re:Does /. have it in for Apple? by i,+Mac · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure... to me it sounds like a long low .....

      "mooooooooooooooooooof"

    10. Re:Does /. have it in for Apple? by pVoid · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Never have I seen so many articles about the (alleged) shortcomings of a single product (aside from Windows, but that's a given.)

      Is it? how is *that* a given? is there a commandment which I'm not aware of that says the windows automatically gets the ire of people? If you can call any names to the slashdot community, it's having a bias towards linux, and against windows.

      Aside from that, these articles about Apple are important: I just bought an Apple macbook a few weeks ago, and I'll tell you that I'm honestly shocked at Apple's level of service both software and hardware wise. It is quite simply bad by any standard, be it Microsoft or open source community.

      However, there was no way for me to know this until I bought the damn thing because there's an army of religious monks out there evangelising about how awesome mac is.

      Giving the bad as well as the good is important.

    11. Re:Does /. have it in for Apple? by bsartist · · Score: 1

      Damn. Oh well, I guess we'll just never know.

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
    12. Re:Does /. have it in for Apple? by TouchOfRed · · Score: 0

      Finnaly! A solid plan with no ????? stages. Looks like we can finnaly start takin care of business around here!

    13. Re:Does /. have it in for Apple? by JustAnEngineer · · Score: 1
      There have been a number of posts in this debate about the poor level of Apple's service. I'm quite surprised, given the service I've gotten. I have a 14" iBook that is less than a year old. After a few weeks, the DVD burner stopped working and just spit out any disc I put in it. I called Apple and had a shipping box the next day. The computer came back to me 24 hours later wearing a new drive. A couple of months later the computer stopped booting, giving a rather sad sounding beep when I tried to power up. I called Apple, and again I had a box the next day and a computer with a new motherboard in 24 hours.

      Both of these issues took one call each, maybe 15 minutes on the line per call. It was a pain to be without the computer for two days total, but I survived. I was somewhat surprised that most of the guts of the computer have had to be replaced within the first year, but it was no problem to have done.

      I did buy AppleCare, since I consider a laptop to be a damage-prone device since I carry it around so much. I've had my parents buy the same warranty with their Dell laptops as well. Since both of these problems occured within the first year, I don't think the extended warranty made a difference though.

      Perhaps if I had a more non-obvious failure it would be more challenging to get fixed. It's pretty simple when your drive simply won't accept a disc or your computer won't turn on. Still, I would think that at least for hardware problems it would be fairly simple to go through the necessary testing steps to confirm that there is a problem that requires service.

      Flame away, those with bad experiences. Or maybe just respond with why it was actually bad...

  13. Guaranteed server meltdown by Leomania · · Score: 2, Funny

    You put the words "grotesque" and "pictures" right next to each other and made them a link... which had predictable results on the responsiveness of the MacFixIt server. That might be some kind of record.

    --
    You don't use science to show that you're right, you use science to become right.
    1. Re:Guaranteed server meltdown by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 1

      Why hasn't someone posted goatse or tubgirl or lastmeasure or lemonparty links to the parent yet? Is slashdot growing up?

  14. more fuel for the fire by logicassasin · · Score: 1

    Just one more thing PC Fanboys have to criticize Apple about. Then too, Mac Zealots do have the exploding Dell laptop thingy...

    --
    Fifty watts per channel, baby cakes.
  15. Happened to mine by falcon5768 · · Score: 4, Informative
    This happened to mine 2 weeks ago (and I actually was one of the first to report the problem to MacInTouch and others. What seems to be the cause is heat and a series of batterys from Feb-March that cant take it. It also seems to ONLY be a cell of the battery, not all three.

    The best course of action is if you see your not getting the maximum power out of the battery (it cuts out) take it out and take it back ASAP. Its likely in 1-2 weeks going to fail.

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  16. Full Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sudden shutdowns can be precursory to severe battery failure We continue to report on severe battery failure -- apparently due to overheating -- from some MacBook Pros.

    As we noted last week, our an in-house MacBook Pro (1.83 GHz) has a battery that has begun to swell noticeably. The system has always had some quirks with battery operation, but recently has begun to randomly shut down, or refuse to operate from the battery alone -- requiring connection to AC power.

    In mild cases, batteries swell but remain functional. In these cases, keyboard and/or trackpad functionality is sometimes affected by the rising of internal components.

    In severe cases, the swelling is visually striking, and users are eventually left with non-functioning batteries.

    In most cases, Apple is replacing these defective batteries on an individual basis. The company has yet to disclose a manufacturing defect affecting any range of serial numbers or date-based production runs.

    Anecdotal evidence (including our own in-house experience) suggests that the problem primarily affects MacBook Pros that were shipped early on in the production cycle -- our MacBook Pro was shipped in February.

    A MacFixIt reader corroborates:

    "Talking to a friend at a Apple Store in NJ, he has had a few people return with battery issues and from the dates strongly suggests its a error that started late Feb to late March, since all the computers coming back fall into that timeframe."

    If your MacBook Pro's battery is swelling, please let us know.

    Running Rosetta applications causes heat spikes Any processor/hard drive intensive operation -- including running applications in Rosetta -- can result in tactile heat spikes from the MacBook Pro.

    As described by MacFixit reader Mark:

    "I've been a happy owner of a MacBook Pro for about 3 months now. In my opinion, it is a laptop in all senses of the word. However, I have noticed a very high sensitivity to the type and intensity of workloads the processors are running in regards to heat. If you are on battery power, the time remaining indicator is an excellent predictor of how hot the 'Book is going to get. If you are running Microsoft Word, your 'Book is going to get very hot. If OpenBase (used with Chronos products) is re-indexing, or Adobe software is running, the 'Book gets hot. Most Rosetta-dependent apps knock 30 min to an hour off of the battery time, even if they are not in the foreground. If you want a cool 'Book, kill all Rosetta-dependent apps unless you need them. The heat drops, the battery lasts 3+ hours, and you have a laptop again."

    Meanwhile, some users report receiving replacements for abnormally hot units.

    MacFixIt reader Del writes:

    "I have a 2.16 GHz MacBook Pro with the 7200 rpm hard drive and 1.5 GB ram. It has been running hot ever since it arrived in April. After downloading from VersionTracker and installing the 'CoreDuoTemp' application version 0.9 which monitors an Intel Mac's internal temperature, I was getting temperature readings as high as 162 degrees Fahrenheit.

    "After speaking with tech support, on May 31, I took the unit to the Apple store for repairs. I have been notified that they are replacing the mother board and the temperature sensors. The repairs are supposed to be complete by June 23, 2006. Apparently the parts were backordered and should arrive by June 16, 2006. I will let you know if this repair fixes the problem with over heating."

    More projector problems Users continue to note issues with output to digital projectors from the MacBook Pro.

    MacFixIt reader Todd Birdsong writes:

    "When I connect the MacBook Pro to a projector, both the audio and video work great when they are independent from each other. It is when you combine the two (which is 99% of the time) that the audio becomes irritatingly noisy. It is a steady 'buzz' which is completely distracting. After checking out all of my gear, I discovered that when you disconnected the DVI/VGA adaptor that the audio returned to normal."

    If you are experiencing a similar issue, please let us know.

    For further coverage, see our MacBook Pro special report

    1. Re:Full Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "When I connect the MacBook Pro to a projector, both the audio and video work great when they are independent from each other. It is when you combine the two (which is 99% of the time) that the audio becomes irritatingly noisy. It is a steady 'buzz' which is completely distracting. After checking out all of my gear, I discovered that when you disconnected the DVI/VGA adaptor that the audio returned

      This sounds like a ground loop. When you connect two devices (one of them having to do with audio) to outlets that are on two different phases it might produce a 50/60hz buzz with usually some harmonics at 120hz and 240hz. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_loop_(electric ity)

      In other words, not the MacBook or the projector are at fault.

  17. This is normal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's no problem. You people are a bunch of whiners. Batteries are supposed to explode, computers are supposed to moo, laptops are typically too hot to rest on your lap and plastic naturally turns pink. Perfectly acceptable. Apple hardware is the best in the world, period.

  18. Mac batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Viagra goes bad...

  19. Why does Apple... by ehaggis · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...want to imitate Dell?

    --
    One ring to bind them - should probably have more fiber and less rings in their diet.
  20. Fix it by electrosoccertux · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they keep swelling and failing, then perhaps they need some supplements. More information readily available in your mail account. But act fast, this offer ends soon!

    1. Re:Fix it by epp_b · · Score: 0

      Apparently, GMail chooses recipes based on your incoming mail.

  21. Shocked... by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

    Now every laptop from every manufacturer has battery problems.

    The MacBook didn't have them for a month because it was new. That's all.

    Who makes these crappy batteries (China obviously) any why do companies keep buying them? And is it the slave labor, or the childrens small hands that makes the quality so low?

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    1. Re:Shocked... by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1
      any why do companies keep buying them?

      Because people don't buy more expensive things when there are cheaper alternatives (unless it's software...).

      It's the same reason why [some] people go wild when they get coupons of 50cent or "+1 free" offers when they otherwise wouldn't buy that product.

      Also, China actively sells producs cheaper to invade markets and can produce much higher volumes of sweet tech.

      these crappy batteries ... is it the slave labor, or the childrens small hands that makes the quality so low
      1. Produce higher volumes in shorter time
      2. sacrifice quality, lower employment-costs,lower endprice
      3. Profit (and create dependency)
      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
  22. Re:Macfixt.com is apparently swelling, then failin by agoodm · · Score: 1

    Trying to mirror the site stand by...

  23. Article doesn't load but banner does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it annoy anyone else that the damn page won't load but their banners certainly do? I don't mind advertising but I hate generating revenue for somebody when I'm getting nothing out of it.

    BTW, these captchas really stink too. I don't have a clue what the last one was.

    1. Re:Article doesn't load but banner does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the banners are usually hosted at a third-party site. the banner site can handle the traffic, the content host cant.

  24. Battery....or charger? by msauve · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd think if this is somewhat common that it is more likely to be an issue with the battery charging circuitry. Lithium batteries in general are pretty reliable, as long as they are properly charged. Overcharging them can cause all kinds of problems, including explosions.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  25. Why this makes me so angry... by Zaphod2016 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Before this year, I hadn't used an Apple since a IIe back in grade school. Why? Because most of my clients are office junkees, and it was just a heck of a lot easier to use windows in the interest of "compatibility". Then came news of the Wintel: a Mac that could do BOTH! I ran out and bought a MacBook Pro the week after they came out. Then my problems began...

    I will skip the horror stories we have all read about, but needless to say the thing is hot, loud and the tech support people are still in denial about everything. I gave up, and down-graded to a MacBook instead. All in all, the MacBook is a solid machine and a quality value- but it still has MANY of the same problems (and a few all its own). In other words, things I consider unacceptable at $2,500 I view as "good enough" at $1,000. Then again, I've been using Dells for the last decade...silly me for thinking quality was a function of cost, eh?

    I simply cannot understand why Apple would do this to itself. The iPod was a grand slam, and I was expecting these Mactels to DOUBLE Apple's market share in time for Vista. I had nothing but high hopes, which is probably why I am so disappointed now.

    Bad metaphor time: I come visit you the day a family member dies. Mom is crying. Dad is drunk. Sis is sneaking a cig. Unbenknownst to me, for 20 years your family has been normal and wonderful, but this is one hell of a shitty first impression. I tell myself "never again", and don't bother to return your phone calls next week.

    In the end, Apple nets even because I bought a second MacBook for the fiance. However, the way I see it, they still LOST a potential $1,500- and probably one heck of a lot of Windows users who are less patient that I am.

    1. Re:Why this makes me so angry... by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      The apple mystery. Since becoming the first and biggest maker of personal computers back in the 80's Apple always sits on his achievements milking customers until it risks bankrupcy, then comes out with a killer thing (the powerpc, the ipod, OSX) and wins back some market and lots of image, until the next depression.
      t's a very dangerous game to play for a company, and it's a pity as OSX is the best commercial OS.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    2. Re:Why this makes me so angry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you list the problems?

    3. Re:Why this makes me so angry... by Americano · · Score: 1
      I simply cannot understand why Apple would do this to itself. The iPod was a grand slam, and I was expecting these Mactels to DOUBLE Apple's market share in time for Vista. I had nothing but high hopes, which is probably why I am so disappointed now.

      That's right... Apple was going to go from 2.5% marketshare, and roar all the way up to a stratospheric 5%. Look out Dell, IBM, and HP... :)
    4. Re:Why this makes me so angry... by Zaphod2016 · · Score: 1

      Can you list the problems?

      Gladly.

      MacBook Pro Issues:

      • I recorded internal temps ranging from 140*-170* F on a regular basis. NOTE: I was informed that the indicators are in unique places, and so old widgets may be giving false readings.
      • After a week of use, the back-lit keyboard wasn't lighting up.
      • The day after that I noticed the battery had stopped charging.
      • I replaced the battery to find that it was NOT the battery's fault. In other words, something inside the machine shorted. It ran on AC with the battery removed, but would not charge the battery.
      • After replacing the first unit (which they did for free), I got a 2nd MBP. Originally, I was getting better lifespan from the 2nd unit (about 4-5 hours!), but after a week of regular use that dropped off to about 2 hours. The 1st unit offered a steady 3-4 hour lifespan but I only had it ~10 days
      • The 2nd unit just blanked out on me after a week. I have no idea why. By then I was fed up, and demanded the lower cost unit instead. If forced to guess, I *think* it had something to do with OSX "sleep" mode (in other words, it may NOT have been hardware related).

      MacBook issues:

      • Too warm to sit comfortably on lap; the hinge (screen to base) gets VERY hot. Not as bad as the MBP, but this is only 1.83ghz x2. Note: compared to the MBP this is only mildly annoying. I feared heat damage on the MBP.
      • Glossy screen. Sunny June afternoon. Why!?!?!
      • When running FF, Skype, iTunes, Mail and iChat at the same time it drags. When I try to use photoshop I can FEEL myself getting older. IMO, 256 x2 DIMM is not enough RAM for all of these awesome apps I have on it. Note: FF is a memory hog, but using Safari and Cyberduck at the same time it still draaaaaags.
      • The CD/DVD drive has no tray (this is true for both MB and MBP). This is a positive and a negative. Plus: no tray to snap off; Minus: thick labels on CD's get jammed in there and it is a holy nightmare to get it back out.

      For the money, I still feel the MacBook is a good value. I just wish they had either a) a $2,500 unit that was WORTH $2,500 or b) a price point in between the two (and I DON'T mean paying an extra $200 for a black case.)

      However, I will suffer it out with my MacBook, slow or not. Why? OSX "had me at hello".

    5. Re:Why this makes me so angry... by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 1

      When I try to use photoshop I can FEEL myself getting older. IMO, 256 x2 DIMM is not enough RAM for all of these awesome apps I have on it.

      Photoshop is emulated and that apparently sucks extra RAM. I don't have an Intel Mac, but I'm reading recommendations that you want 2GB (!) if you're seriously using the rosetta emulator. On my PPC, I'm happy with 1GB, not so happy with 512MB.

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    6. Re:Why this makes me so angry... by malahoo · · Score: 1

      Just a note - I got the base MB with 512MB, upgraded to 2 GB for $150 (generic RAM from pricewatch.com), and now the machine is bitchin fast. Even with Eclipse, lots of tabs in FireFox, Mail, iTunes, Terminal, and several MS RDC connections open at the same time.
      I love this machine.
      I don't use it for Photoshop, but Office is emulated and I really don't notice any sluggishness. Next version of Photoshop is supposed to be native...

      --


      If you're not wasted, the day is.
    7. Re:Why this makes me so angry... by Zaphod2016 · · Score: 1

      Please forgive a silly question: can I install RAM into my MacBook myself? I have never cracked one of these babies open before. Anything odd I should be on the lookout for? (I'm no stranger to the inside of an IBM clone).

    8. Re:Why this makes me so angry... by toQDuj · · Score: 1

      should be no problem:

      http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=303 721

      (btw, this is the first hit after the first search in googgle for "installing ram in macbook").

      Upgraded my 2 year old powerbook G4 as well to a 1G, and even there it made a huge difference.

      Good luck!

      B.

      --
      Every experiment which ends in a big bang is a good experiment.
    9. Re:Why this makes me so angry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When running FF, Skype, iTunes, Mail and iChat at the same time it drags. When I try to use photoshop I can FEEL myself getting older. IMO, 256 x2 DIMM is not enough RAM for all of these awesome apps I have on it. Note: FF is a memory hog, but using Safari and Cyberduck at the same time it still draaaaaags.

      As another reply mentioned, yes, more memory is a GOOD idea. Realize that the Mac will actually put your RAM to good use (instead of paging an "idle" app to disk even when 75% of your RAM is unused anyway like Windows does) and you'll feel better about it.

      Also, realize that FireFox has some interesting speed-related issues. For example, watch your CPU usage in Activity Monitor when you have the mouse held down in a FireFox window. Notice an odd spike?
  26. Will you still be able to bring them on planes? by bepolite · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...and what happens if you say *Macbook* while waiting in line at the airport?

    --
    Always be polite.
    1. Re:Will you still be able to bring them on planes? by NosTROLLdamus · · Score: 0
      We've got MOTHERFUCKING MACBOOKS!!

      --Macbooks on a plane, Summer 2006

  27. Explanation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe your MBP is just excited to see you?

  28. At least they do not explode like DELL !!! by jackhitrov · · Score: 1
    1. Re:At least they do not explode like DELL !!! by xenoandroid · · Score: 1

      We all know that Dell tries to give their customers the best bang for their buck.

    2. Re:At least they do not explode like DELL !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, just burst into flames when you leave the room.

      http://wcco.com/consumer/local_story_148150249.htm l

  29. Kyocera by HaloZero · · Score: 1

    Kyocera smart phones (the 7135 variety) had a problem like this a while back; the contents of the battery pack would leak and become super-heated. The resulting condition would cause pressure to build up within the skin of the battery cell and the cell would eventually fail, releasing some very angry super-charged gas. This burned a few people, IIRC, and Kyocera recalled the batteries.

    I wonder if these fail in nay similar way, 'with force' as the Kyocera batteries did. It's one thing to stop working and gently split open. It's entirely another to stop working and blow apart.

    --
    Informatus Technologicus
  30. Huh? by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Saying that iPod batteries (or anything else about the iPod) last "one year" is complete and total bullshit. Hell, the warranty is one year. And you can extend it to two years for $59 (or get a third party service plan), and yes, all of those cover the battery.

    They're lithium ion batteries just like any other lithium ion battery, so why not recommend people not buy anything else with lithium ion batteries in it in the UK? There's nothing worse about, or wrong with, the lithium ion batteries Apple uses in the iPod. They come from the likes of Sony, Sanyo, and other leading lithium ion battery manufacturers. The original iPod batteries were stock, pre-existing Sony batteries and weren't even built to Apple specifications

    And before anyone says the battery is "sealed inside", so what? Let's say you buy a Nokia phone, and the Nokia-branded battery replacement is $60. Well, Apple will replace your iPod battery with the Apple-branded battery replacement (actually, by giving you a new or factory-refurbished-in-a-brand-new-enclosure iPod with its own warranty) for $60. Or, you can get a replacement battery that's even higher capacity than Apple's for $25 from any of dozens of outfits selling iPod batteries and replace it yourself in about 5-10 minutes.

    For the truth, see iPod Battery FAQ. Disclaimer: iPod Battery FAQ is my site. It does have Google Adsense on it, but I don't sell anything. So if you think this is some "trick" to get people to visit it, by all means, don't click an ad. I believe I have covered the iPod battery issue extensively, and extensively disproven the crap. I challenge anyone to find anything incorrect on the site.

    1. Re:Huh? by MrSquirrel · · Score: 1

      Yes, pay $25 (PLUS shipping) to replace the battery on your (overpriced) iPod yourself -- successfully voiding your expensive warranty.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
    2. Re:Huh? by deacon · · Score: 2, Informative
      From the iDave battery faq site:

      Q: Is the iPod's battery replaceable?

      A: Yes. Apple has an official battery replacement program for $59. The program requires that you send in your iPod (any model), and Apple will replace the battery and return it to you for $59 plus shipping and handling (technically, Apple actually replaces your whole iPod with an equivalent new model or factory-refurbished model in a new enclosure, with its own service warranty; if the iPod was previously engraved by Apple, it will be engraved again). AppleCare programs for iPod are also available in some markets outside the US, and are expected soon in other markets.

      What a hassle. So my never-dropped iPod is going to be replaced with "refurbished" guts with who knows what history. Then I pay for shipping and handling. Then I have to be able to back up my music before my iPod dies so I can reload it again (assuming I CAN reload my music on the "refurbished" guts I get back). And, this program used to cost $99 for the battery, it has been reduced to "only" $59.

      By comparison, I can pick up a name brand or generic battery for my cell phone anywhere I want to, and just snap it in.

    3. Re:Huh? by farble1670 · · Score: 0

      And before anyone says the battery is "sealed inside", so what?

      what happens to that fantastic apple warranty if i replace my own battery? that's the difference.

      so why not recommend people not buy anything else with lithium ion batteries in it in the UK?

      there are different qualities of batteries, regardless of the manufacturer.

      Saying that iPod batteries (or anything else about the iPod) last "one year" is complete and total bullshit. Hell, the warranty is one year.

      and the warranty is free, right?


    4. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the website you mention:

      Q: Is the iPod's battery user-replaceable?

      A1: Yes and no. The iPod's case is not designed to be opened, so, in that respect, it's not what would generally be referred to as "user-replaceable".


      If the item is not meant to be opened like that, opening it would void your warranty (and probably statutory rights) due to tampering. If the device is intended to last 6 years, but the battery will require service before then, the manufacturer should, nay, must make the battery user serviceable unless they want to replace it for you (at no extra cost except for the parts).

      It is simply NOT user serviceable on those iPods. Period. Apple charges more to replace the batteries than the batteries are worth by a long shot. If Apple were to offer a program to replace the cases with user serviceable battery cases, then that's ok. Until then, I think the grandparent has it right.

    5. Re:Huh? by daveschroeder · · Score: 2, Informative

      What a hassle. So my never-dropped iPod is going to be replaced with "refurbished" guts with who knows what history. Then I pay for shipping and handling. Then I have to be able to back up my music before my iPod dies so I can reload it again (assuming I CAN reload my music on the "refurbished" guts I get back). And, this program used to cost $99 for the battery, it has been reduced to "only" $59.

      By comparison, I can pick up a name brand or generic battery for my cell phone anywhere I want to, and just snap it in.


      So don't use Apple's replacement service, then. Get any number of third-party batteries, some of which are name brand, some of which are generic, and many of which are even better than Apple's batteries themselves. These can be gotten for as low as $25. So every couple of years you take 5 minutes to replace your battery instead of 5 seconds? So what?

      Also, you make "refurbished" sound a little bit worse than it is. First of all, all of the electronics and disk/disk surface are checked over and tested. Second, everything is mounted in a brand new enclosure, so that the iPod physically looks and appears to be brand new. And lastly, that replacement iPod has a warranty of its own. Of course, no one makes you use that option, as you can replace your own battery in your own iPod yourself, or have any number of non-Apple entities do this for you in your own iPod. Again, this only happens every 2-4 years or so, depending on your usage cycle and style, so is it really that big of a deal?

      That's the tradeoff for the iPod having no access mechanisms, doors, or screws, giving it the sleek appearance everyone apparently likes so much. (And even if they did screws and not doors, Apple would still have to follow regulatory guidelines for segregating the battery from the rest of the electronics and innards, which would significantly increase the units size. And even a millimeter is significant for an iPod.)

    6. Re:Huh? by LochNess · · Score: 1

      what happens to that fantastic apple warranty if i replace my own battery? that's the difference.

      If it's under warranty, why would you be replacing the battery yourself?

    7. Re:Huh? by daveschroeder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the item is not meant to be opened like that, opening it would void your warranty (and probably statutory rights) due to tampering.

      Nice try. If the unit is under warranty, the battery is covered, and your iPod will be replaced with a new (not refurbished) iPod if the original iPod was under its factory warranty or AppleCare. (And 3rd party service plans, like Best Buy, will simply replace it with an equivalent new (or newer) model.) Strike one.

      If the device is intended to last 6 years, but the battery will require service before then, the manufacturer should, nay, must make the battery user serviceable unless they want to replace it for you (at no extra cost except for the parts).

      No, they mustn't do anything of the sort. Batteries sometimes need to be replaced. There are numerous mechanisms to replace them in iPods, both from Apple and others, both do-it-yourself and full service. These are all only needed out-of-warranty, so there are no warranty or rights to be voided. Strike two.

      It is simply NOT user serviceable on those iPods. Period. Apple charges more to replace the batteries than the batteries are worth by a long shot. If Apple were to offer a program to replace the cases with user serviceable battery cases, then that's ok. Until then, I think the grandparent has it right.

      Manufacturers ALWAYS charge more for their branded battery. I dare you to find any place with a cell phone, PDA, laptop, etc., where this isn't the case, sometimes by significant margins. The case is no different with Apple. And like with any other such device that uses lithium ion batteries, it is a pure and simple fact that the iPod battery can be replaced, by you, the end user, in mere minutes for as little as $25, with batteries that are many times better and longer-lasting than the OEM battery. The "user replaceable" argument is only meaningful in the context of the warranty, which you can't void once the warranty is over. Further, if you're *that concerned* about the possibility of damage, there are numerous non-Apple vendors that will replace the battery for you, overnight. Strike three.

      As I said elsewhere, this is the tradeoff for making the device have no doors, access panels, screws, and so on. Clearly the sleek, unblemished form factor is at least one of the things that made the iPod so successful that it controls 92% of the portable music player market, even at prices that rival - and indeed, sometimes exceed - those of cheap desktop computers. If there were any traditionally "user serviceable" access mechanisms, the size of the unit would be markedly increased. It's not just a matter of making the back come off with screws; they'd have to segregate the battery from other innards, adding bulk, size, and weight, and likely also requiring a different design philosophy on the inside that would add at least a couple of millimeters. On a device where the thickness is already measured in millimeters, that's a lot.

    8. Re:Huh? by daveschroeder · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, pay $25 (PLUS shipping) to replace the battery on your (overpriced) iPod yourself -- successfully voiding your expensive warranty.

      Huh?

      If your iPod is under warranty, and it needs its battery replaced, it's covered by the warranty. Therefore you're not "voiding your warranty" by doing something utterly retarded like BUYING a battery when you can get the entire iPod replaced by a new (not refurbished) iPod under the manufacturer's warranty. So what the hell are you talking about? (I don't expect you'll respond.)

      (To say nothing of the fact that while all lithium iPod batteries degrade, it's a hugely small minority that would actually have batteries defective to the point of needing to be replaced within one year. Most peoples' iPod batteries last longer than two and three years or more, and that's just the pure and simple fact of the matter.)

    9. Re:Huh? by daveschroeder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      what happens to that fantastic apple warranty if i replace my own battery? that's the difference.

      Why the hell would you do that? Frankly, I don't even know why we're talking about needing to replace the battery while the iPod is still under warranty, since I haven't heard of that many people (other than ones who actually have *defective* batteries, which is a different story) that needed to replace their battery in the first two or three years, much less one year.

      But just for the sake of argument, if your battery "failed" for some reason in the first year while your iPod was under warranty, it would seem to me that if you're not a complete fool you'd, oh, I don't know, have it handled by Apple, since your iPod is still under warranty, and the battery is covered? While under warranty or AppleCare, if you have a fault with the unit, it will be replaced with a new unit (not a refurbished one). So, the answer to "what happens to my fantastic Apple warranty" is "you get a new iPod".

      Now, if you're really a whiny moron and you come back with "Yes, but what if I want to replace it with the Super Duper High Capacity battery I saw online while it's still under warranty? What then?" The answer is:

      - Risk it.
      - Wait until your warranty is up.
      - Don't get an iPod if you insist on being such a tool.

      there are different qualities of batteries, regardless of the manufacturer.

      Yes, and Apple uses some of the best out there.

      and the warranty is free, right?

      Yes. (???)

    10. Re:Huh? by snuf23 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One certainly wonders why this has become such a personal crusade for you. Nevertheless let me address one thing:

      "And before anyone says the battery is "sealed inside", so what?"

      Convenience my friend, simple consumer convenience. If I can walk in and purchase a new battery and replace it myself in 30 seconds, I prefer that to having to bring it and leave it at the shop.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    11. Re:Huh? by daveschroeder · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Convenience my friend, simple consumer convenience. If I can walk in and purchase a new battery and replace it myself in 30 seconds, I prefer that to having to bring it and leave it at the shop.

      You don't have to. You can replace it yourself in 5 minutes instead of 30 seconds, the one time you'll need to do so every 2 to 4 years or so.

      Or you can just not get an iPod, I suppose, if having a battery door is really that important to you.

      And as for consumer benefit, don't you think there might be benefits in terms of size, weight, and unblemished, sleek appearance from not having to have battery doors or other access mechanisms? Because - and I hate to say this, because people don't seem to believe it - it WOULD be bigger and heavier. That's because it's not just a matter of having the back come off with screws. They'd need to design the innards such that the battery was physically segregated from the rest of the inside, likely requiring some tradeoffs that would increase size and weight, however slightly. If people want to think "Apple fucked up" or that this was done to make iPods disposable, they'd be completely wrong, for one (since the batteries can be replaced in myriad ways), and it would seem they'd also not be a good decisionmaker at Apple, since the decisions on the iPod so far have led to it having 92% share for portable music players.

    12. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having read the article, I don't believe it states that all the failures are due to the battery - your post is somewhat off-topic. The point of the article isn't to discuss the nature of the failures, just that they seem to be happening at an alarming rate and that under UK law, consumers should have better rights that those to which they are being treated.

      Personally I've seen lots of broken 40GB click wheel iPods, most of which seemed to have failed HDDs (the iPods would make a clicking sound and then come up with the unhappy iPod face) - nothing to do with the battery, but still unreliable and short lived.

    13. Re:Huh? by MrSquirrel · · Score: 1

      If I recall -- the batteries were not supported in the warranty until people started bitching about them. I had to friends with first-gen iPods that went to crap and Apple said "tough shit -- that's what batteries do". Strangely, I use my Creative Nomad (which I bought around the same time they did) much more frequently than they did, and hence charged it more too, and my battery life has hardly deteriorated at all (hey, don't blame Apple, they used Sony batteries -- Sony blows!).

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
    14. Re:Huh? by kchrist · · Score: 1

      Regarding paying for shipping: If you have an Apple store nearby, take the iPod there instead of mailing it in. Just last night my SO brought her 3rd gen. iPod to the local store to have her battery replaced and they gave her a replacement iPod on the spot.

    15. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to get out more, my friend!

    16. Re:Huh? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      What a hassle. So my never-dropped iPod is going to be replaced with "refurbished" guts with who knows what history.

      On the other hand, if your iPod is old and beaten up, for 60 bucks you get to swap it and get a new battery as well.

    17. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, pay $25 (PLUS shipping) to replace the battery on your (overpriced) iPod yourself -- successfully voiding your expensive warranty.

      The only explanation I can think for for this comment is that you're determined to be negative, and that determination has so clouded your thinking that you can't see how incredibly stupid it is. No one is going to replace the battery on their own when it's still under warranty.

    18. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just the fact that there is a need for an iPod Battery FAQ speaks volumes. You don't see battery FAQs for other players where changing the battery is as easy as popping open a door and putting a new battery in, do you?

    19. Re:Huh? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      One certainly wonders why this has become such a personal crusade for you.

      Because anti-Mac fanboys are just as stupid and annoying as pro-Mac fanboys, and are a lot more common.

      Convenience my friend, simple consumer convenience.

      Exactly. Having to swap out batteries all the time is a huge pain in the ass. And that's with rechargables. If you're talking regular alkaline batteries, it because a huge, expensive pain in the ass.

      Having a built in battery that get's 14-20 hours per charge is much more convenient, yes.

    20. Re:Huh? by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

      Having a built in battery that get's 14-20 hours per charge is much more convenient, yes.

      Also much more convenient than that, is having a built-in battery that gets 14-20 hours charge, that you can replace yourself if it goes wrong. Or even the novelty of being able to have several batteries spare if you run out of charge on the move.

      Also before some whiny bastard says it, don't give me that 'nice form-factor' bullshit, the Creative Jukebox Zen Micro and many other MP3 players look just as good as an iPod IMHO and manage to have a replaceable rechargable battery.

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    21. Re:Huh? by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      "Because anti-Mac fanboys are just as stupid and annoying as pro-Mac fanboys, and are a lot more common."

      I'm not certain if you are trying to imply I'm an anti-Mac fanboy. I also don't really know why that would be relevant in a discussion about an iPod. Anyway, I own an iPod and have purchased two other ones for my SO. I'm merely commenting on a feature I would like them to have.

      "Having a built in battery that get's 14-20 hours per charge is much more convenient, yes."

      You can have a removable battery that performs the same as a non-removable one. I'm not talking about using off the shelf alkaline batteries. I also have never had the charge last for 14-20 hours of active use on my iPod Mini. Admittedly this is supposedly better with the second gen ones.
      I don't see how having the same battery which is removable is less desirable than having that battery built-in and not (easily) user replaceable. It would be nice to be able to charge an extra battery to take with me sometimes. This is what I do with my PDA.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    22. Re:Huh? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1
      I'm not certain if you are trying to imply I'm an anti-Mac fanboy. I also don't really know why that would be relevant in a discussion about an iPod.

      Obviously it was a response to your own question to the parent: One certainly wonders why this has become such a personal crusade for you.

      I don't see how having the same battery which is removable is less desirable than having that battery built-in and not (easily) user replaceable.

      Well let's see: they're expensive, small, easy to lose, and don't hold a charge very well, so you have to keep recharging your spares. It's also going to increase the size of the unit and make it less durable, unless they make it larger still. 12+ hours is enough to get most people by between places they can recharge their iPods. And if not, there are external battery packs available that use AA batteries and plug into the dock.
    23. Re:Huh? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Also much more convenient than that, is having a built-in battery that gets 14-20 hours charge, that you can replace yourself if it goes wrong. Or even the novelty of being able to have several batteries spare if you run out of charge on the move.

      Hardly. The batteries are small, expensive and easy to lose. If something "goes wrong" during your warranty Apple will replace it. 14-20 hours is a full days use for most of the population, and unless you're backpacking it will see you to a spot where you can recharge.

      Also before some whiny bastard says it, don't give me that 'nice form-factor' bullshit,

      Pfft. It's not just looks, adding a removeable battery is going to make the unit larger and less durable, unless you make it larger still.

      the Creative Jukebox Zen Micro and many other MP3 players look just as good as an iPod IMHO and manage to have a replaceable rechargable battery.

      Right, which is why they have 90% of the market. Not.

    24. Re:Huh? by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

      Hardly. The batteries are small, expensive and easy to lose.

      And yet bigger than Zen Micro batteries, and they cost about 10 quid. 20 dollars to you. BANK-BREAKING!

      If something "goes wrong" during your warranty Apple will replace it.

      Except they don't count most things as 'going wrong'. You'd better have a problem or you're paying out. That is from a friend's personal experience, and she'll never buy an iPod again.

      14-20 hours is a full days use for most of the population, and unless you're backpacking it will see you to a spot where you can recharge.

      Unless you forget. Or you actually are backpacking or camping. Or any other of the host of reasons why you might not make it back to somewhere with a power-socket and understanding electricity bill payers. Why cut off the option on the grounds that it's not common?

      Not everyone goes back to the same house every night, and therefore not everyone can charge their iPod every night.

      It's not just looks, adding a removeable battery is going to make the unit larger and less durable, unless you make it larger still.

      Wow. How much do Apple pay you again? Removable batteries are the same size as non-removable ones. Because, you know, they're made out of the same thing. The only difference is exposed terminals at one end instead of directly connected wiring.

      Right, which is why they have 90% of the market. Not.

      That part of the post was opinion. You've done pretty badly at answering the factual parts of what I said, what made you think you had the right to argue my opinion with me? No, wait, you didn't. Great! Yes, looks are a matter of opinion, which is exactly why I was stopping anyone from trying to argue it with me.

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    25. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The FAQ is needed because even though it's been blindingly obvious for almost three years that there are about 20 different options for replacing batteries in iPods, including from the manufacturer itself, people still seem to believe that iPod batteries only last 18 months and once they die, you have to get a new iPod.

      Which is complete and utter bullshit.

    26. Re:Huh? by garote · · Score: 1

      >> Hardly. The batteries are small, expensive and easy to lose.
      >
      >And yet bigger than Zen Micro batteries, and they cost about 10
      >quid. 20 dollars to you. BANK-BREAKING!

      Well, yeah. That's dinner and dessert at a local restaurant.
      And I agree: The batteries would be too small, and therefore too easy to lose or leave behind.

      >>If something "goes wrong" during your warranty Apple will replace it.
      >
      >Except they don't count most things as 'going wrong'.

      Quit changing the subject. If your battery craps out before a year, Apple will replace it. Don't believe me? Go call an apple support rep and ask.

      >14-20 hours is a full days use for most of the population,
      >
      >Unless you forget. Or you actually are backpacking or camping.
      >Or any other of the host of reasons why you might not make it
      >back to somewhere with a power-socket and understanding
      >electricity bill payers. Why cut off the option on the grounds
      >that it's not common?

      So go to Fry's and buy that Belkin doohickey that allows you to fully recharge your iPod on four standard (or high-capacity rechargeable) AA-size batteries. It's not much bigger than the bag you'd have to store the spares in ANYWAY, and if you want you can bring an extra twenty thousand batteries along for the ride. Though personally, when I go camping (not full-on backpacking) I find it easier to just recharge the iPod with a car adapter.

      >Not everyone goes back to the same house every night, and therefore
      >not everyone can charge their iPod every night.

      See above solution. You're either going to be bringing your spare batteries, or you're going to be bringing a charger. Either way the total weight of your additional equipment will be about the same. Unless you claim that your friends hand out charged batteries to houseguests regularly.

      >>It's not just looks, adding a removeable battery is going to make
      >>the unit larger and less durable, unless you make it larger still.
      >
      >Wow. How much do Apple pay you again?

      Jackass.

      >Removable batteries are the same size as non-removable ones.

      Not really. Non-removable batteries can leave off a fair amount of insulation, and also do not need as high a capacity because a wired connection with a plug is always going to give better througphut than a removable battery pressed onto a pair of contacts with a spring.

      >Because, you know, they're made out of the same thing.

      Oversimplification, see above.

      >The only difference is exposed terminals at one end instead of
      >directly connected wiring.

      Which actually makes a difference, see above.

      This is all besides the point because the issue is not the design and condition of the battery, it's the design of the device INTO WHICH THE BATTERY GOES. And yes, the Zen has a removable battery, but the whole unit is less durable because of the sliding-catch design they appropriated from the designers of cellphones. Drop it on the floor from the right angle and the catch breaks and/or the battery pops off, just like those old cellphones.

      It's also less resistant to moisture, including the accumulated sweat from a workout - but in the interest of fairness, that doesn't mean much because, iPod or Zen, you're going to be getting a case or putting it in a sealed bag or container when you do anything risky.

  31. And we hear about this because... its Apple by Gothmolly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If this happened to Dell, or Compaq, or random-nonname-clone, this wouldn't be news. Because its Apple, there's shock and dismay. Perhaps because people have a higher expectation of Apple, or a lower expectation of PC hardware?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:And we hear about this because... its Apple by swngnmonk · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it only yesterday that slashdot was linking to video of an Exploding Dell Laptop?? Hmmm??

      --

      'ARRGH! Pirate Designers of the Internet, we be!'

    2. Re:And we hear about this because... its Apple by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Apple [at least used to] cost more, presumably due to higher quality.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    3. Re:And we hear about this because... its Apple by cnettel · · Score: 1
      If it were to come to a recall, it would certainly be news for other manufacturers. Now, it's hard to tell from these anecdotes (but, anecdotes with pictures) how frequent it really is, but I clearly remember Dell's different battery recalls being reported quite widely.

      On the general hot/loud issues I agree with you, they are not reported as news for other manufacturers, but they are certainly mentioned in reviews of specific models. They are not blindly accepted.

    4. Re:And we hear about this because... its Apple by evilviper · · Score: 1
      If this happened to Dell, or Compaq, or random-nonname-clone, this wouldn't be news.

      Sure it would be. Every notebook recall gets a story on /. and situations where there should be a recall, but there hasn't, get multiple stories.

      Perhaps because people have a higher expectation of Apple, or a lower expectation of PC hardware?

      Perhaps because people have a higher expectation of hardware they paid $3,000 for... Find a story about Thinkpads (still cheaper than Apple) with swelling batteries, and it will get posted to /. as well.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:And we hear about this because... its Apple by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      No, if it happened to Dell or Compaq, we'd still hear about it right here on Slashdot. The difference is that because it's Apple, Apple fanboys come on and post about how Apple is getting unfair treatment for releasing a shoddy product and people should still love them.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    6. Re:And we hear about this because... its Apple by hysterik · · Score: 1

      It did happen to Dell and we did hear about it.

      http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/06/ 21/1448207&from=rss

      Your point?

    7. Re:And we hear about this because... its Apple by keesh · · Score: 1

      It's because Apple hardware is so frickin' expensive, so people kinda expect it to actually work.

    8. Re:And we hear about this because... its Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It did happen to Dell and we did hear about it.

      Because it burst into flames.

      Your point?

      That you're an idiot.

    9. Re:And we hear about this because... its Apple by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      That's true. I don't like Macs at all but in my experience every laptop has at least one flaw. My Dell Inspiron 2200 has a faulty sound chipset which gets interference from a capacitor. Dell replaced it, the problem remains, and although they said they were working on a revised version they ended up e-mailing to tell me that they couldn't sort the problem out.
      If it was a Mac that'd probably be news here, but it's a Dell.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    10. Re:And we hear about this because... its Apple by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      No, if it happened to Dell or Compaq, we'd still hear about it right here on Slashdot.

      Not until it got to recall or serious lawsuit stage, it wouldn't. For a Dell battery problem to make it onto Slashdot, it has to be a bit more catostrophic than "bulging".

      The difference is that because it's Apple, Apple fanboys come on and post about how Apple is getting unfair treatment for releasing a shoddy product and people should still love them.

      Or the annoying anti-fanboys who pop into EVERY APPLE STORY accusing Slashdot or some poster of pro-Apple bias, without providing any evidience of said bias.

    11. Re:And we hear about this because... its Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a bit of a difference between "bulging" and "exploding", isn't there? Hmmmmmmmmmmm?!?

      idiots.

    12. Re:And we hear about this because... its Apple by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      The Apple batteries didn't just "bulge," they're defective, and there's lots of them. They fail in a short period of time after "bulging" and don't have the maxiumum battery usage during "bulging." How is this not news? And as for "annoying anti-fanboys" - you mean "regular people?" I was considering purchasing a macbook and now am going to reconsider until they get the kinks out.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    13. Re:And we hear about this because... its Apple by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      The Apple batteries didn't just "bulge," they're defective,

      Duh, no one is disputing that. Unless Apple is refusing to replace the bulging batteries, this is a red herring.

      and there's lots of them

      Please, this is the Internet. "Lots of them" could mean a dozen out of a hundred thousand.

      They fail in a short period of time after "bulging" and don't have the maxiumum battery usage during "bulging." How is this not news?

      For the same reason that every single hardware defect is not "news": they happen all the time. A couple years ago, Dell had some crappy DVD drives in their Optiplexes that wouldn't close after being opened. There was no front page story on Slashdot about it a week after the first photo was posted. Same thing when they had some defective video cards, or problems with the 40 gigabyte Maxtor hard drives. You ship a sizable number of units of any product and you're going to have some defects. If this were some other company than Apple, we wouldn't even hear about this until it reached lawsuit/recall stage, and maybe not even then.

      And as for "annoying anti-fanboys" - you mean "regular people?"

      "Regular people" do not snobbishly complain about bais where no bias actually exists, unless you happen to be a Republican.

      I was considering purchasing a macbook and now am going to reconsider until they get the kinks out.

      If you wait until everything is defect free, you'll never buy anything, because a percentage of any product will be defective.

  32. powerbook 5300 redux? credit for G3 pismo by hguorbray · · Score: 1

    One of the few issues of this type that Apple did (sort of) 'fess up to was the 5300 powerbooks that had the first generation LiOn batteries which would heat up and literally fry the powerbook when recharging.

    I was the beneficiary of Apple's belated recall/tradein ~2001 and was able to get ~$700 off on the G3 Pismo powerbook that I still use as a portable music workstation. there must be a landfill somewhere full of these things as a result of the tradein. I think they saw this as the only way to get out of supporting this bad product.

    The funny thing was that I got the 5300ce for about $100 from a friend who 'liberated' it from Nokia's San Francisco offices when they shut down there in the mid '90s -the executives had taken all of the other, better, newer laptops, but these were considered dogs almost upon release:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerBook_5300

    I was amazed/appalled to see that my 5300ce once cost over $6,000

    I actually never had any problems with mine -I just never liked OS 8 on it -and as soon as OS X came out I updated my replacement G3 and have never looked back (except when accidentally launching Word and going into 'classic' mode.

    -What's the speed of dark?

  33. Re:Macfixt.com is apparently swelling, then failin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  34. Coral Cache by markild · · Score: 1

    Coral cache of the page..

    --
    Scully: Should we arrest David Copperfield?
    Mulder: Yes we should, but not for this.
  35. The batteries aren't swollen... by maniac/dev/null · · Score: 1

    ...they're just big boned.

  36. Re:Macfixt.com is apparently swelling, then failin by agoodm · · Score: 5, Informative

    Takes a long time to load. My mirror is better: http://195.62.29.95/www.macfixit.com/index.html sponsored by: www.photojerk.com - Server is downloading the images so I will replace the non imaged version here with a version that has images when its done.

  37. Not this time by greg1104 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I clicked once on a slashdot link that led to grotesque pictures of swollen parts. That was also quite a wide-scale issue, very wide in fact. I'm not falling for that one again.

  38. More than you believe by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For the last 10 years, I help my neighbor out with his mac. In this case, he has an e-mac that had a filesystem failing. I thought it was the OS so forced him to upgrade to tiger. When the problem continued, I checked up on other issues. What I found is that the emac has an issue with mb capacitors. So I popped it open to take a peak. Sure enough, they have started leaking. Yet, apple does not want to do a recall on this. Sadly, I fear that Apple is becoming no different than others. As it is, I will recommend that his next system have a seperate monitor/system so that if he lose his hardware again, then he can switch to a linux box.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:More than you believe by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think its amazing you'd expect your neighbor to make the leap from a Mac to Linux.

      Ever hear of another Mac or maybe even Windows?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    2. Re:More than you believe by gibbynoz · · Score: 1

      That's unfornunate what happened to your friend's eMac.

      In my case, I purchased a iMac G5 and 14 months later the capicators on the MB went bad. Since I didn't purchase AppleCare I was expecting the worst. However, Apple new of the problem with my particular model and offered an additional year of warranty coverage for this issue. The "genius" and other staff at the Apple Store couldn't have been more helpful in getting my Mac fixed including the hard drive that got taken down along with the MB.

      Lesson learned: purchase the AppleCare.

      -- Noz.

    3. Re:More than you believe by Emetophobe · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Sadly, I fear that Apple is becoming no different than others.
      After owning 2 ipods within the period of a year and a half, I would definitely say Apple is becoming no different than others. It took me 6 months for them to replace my first ipod under warranty, each time I sent it in to them, they would send it back a few weeks later supposedely "fixed". But, the same issues would shortly return a day or two after I got it back (songs skipping, hard drive whirring sounds, crashes, lockups, unable to boot it up at all, unable to sync my song list via itunes, etc..). After the 3rd time they finally agreed to replace it with a new unit, which is working fine so far (only had it for 2 months so far). The only good part wa that my old ipod was a 4th gen 20gig ipod and they replaced it with a 5th gen 30gig video ipod.
    4. Re:More than you believe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me get this straight... You figured out that it was the capacitors. ANd then told him to buy another computer? Why didn't you just replace the caps? And you are posting this on Slashdot? What, are you not really a geek? Or just have no soldering skillz?

    5. Re:More than you believe by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      if he lose his hardware again, then he can switch to a linux box.

      A who? Who is this hardware manufacturer "Linux" and why hasn't Linus sued them for trademark dilution?

      Oh wait, that's right. A Linux box is any old PC box, reformatted to run Linux. That means the same bad capacitors that contaminated the entire computer industry are as likely to be found in a Linux box as in your friend's eMac.

      Not to mention that there is no hardware difference between your regular Windows box and your regular Linux box. (Unless, of course, you're buying Linspire PCs.)

    6. Re:More than you believe by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      This is his 3 mac. This is also his 2nd failure.

      As to the move, it is far easier to move hime from Mac to linux, then from mac to Windows. He and his wife have tried all 3 and they like the mac first, linux second, and do not like windows.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    7. Re:More than you believe by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1

      Weird, I should look up how common this is. My 3rd gen ipod is the most rugged mp3 player I've ever owned (Creative Nomad Jukebox, Nomad II (2 of them), Diamond Rio (2 of them), some early LG 16mb flash based one), by the metric of it hasn't broken yet. Its been about 3 years now, and none of my others lasted more than 1, with the exception of the Jukebox which I think lasted about 2. As an aside, all of these are warranty exchanges from my first Rio. Go old-style futureshop warranty.

      --
      :x
    8. Re:More than you believe by goaty_the_flying_sho · · Score: 1

      Capacitors are the easiest to fix. Order a bunch off digikey, get soldering and maybe you can have your geek membership card back.

    9. Re:More than you believe by fufubag · · Score: 0

      Exactly. It's not a mac box, which is a mac box that always has x motherboard, and if you don't like it or it has problems, you get another x motherboard. With a windows or linux box, YOU choose the motherboard you want, you know, from the company that has been good to you in the past, be it x,y,z,m,s,i...

    10. Re:More than you believe by jrmcferren · · Score: 0

      I have to say, I did not get any soldering skills in my vo-tech class. I will be getting them in a later term in my associate degree program. I have soldered before, but I put the device (rectifier) in backwards and never fixed it. I don't know if my soldering would be reliable or not (probably not). Even if a tech has soldering skills, most of the time, the tech will not replace the caps (unless it is their personal machine) but replace the motherboard.

      --
      sudo mod me up
    11. Re:More than you believe by tylernt · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I've replaced caps on network switches, and it ain't as easy as it looks. Acually the solding part can be easier than the desoldering.

      Motherboards have components packed pretty close, so I wouldn't do it unless I was prepared to buy a new mobo anyway in case I screwed up.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    12. Re:More than you believe by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I think the point was, that with a generic box running Linux you can just replace an affected component when something craps out instead of the whole computer. It's a lot cheaper that way.

    13. Re:More than you believe by megaditto · · Score: 3, Funny
      a filesystem failing. I thought it was the OS so forced him to upgrade to tiger.


      Thank you, that was just priceless. And next time your power supply catches fire, remember to add nosmoke.sys to your win.ini . Upgrading to OS X 10.5 also fixes those dead MacBook LCD pixels... [no, no not really]

      Next time your neighbor needs help, he is better off FSCK-ing himself than listening you you, is what I am saying
      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    14. Re:More than you believe by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Look, I really don't want to sound harsh, but you're an idiot if you're expecting a company to fix leaking caps in a computer that was built several years ago (when _everyone_ used the shitty chinese rip-off version of capacitor juice.)
      I really don't think that Apple ever was any different. I can think of several situations where they have basically stepped back and said "fuckit, we're not fixing this, let the customers deal with it" (g3 ibook logic boards, mdd macs, crappy hinges on the iLamp mac, etc.
      Of course, you can do much worse than buying apple - compare the problems that Apple had to the problems that Toshiba laptops were plagued with.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    15. Re:More than you believe by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      I'd wager the capacitors soldered on the motherboard of a Mac are just as easy to replace as the capacitors soldered on the motherboard of a Dell.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    16. Re:More than you believe by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      ok, I just looked at an eMac logic board. Honestly, the caps look like they'd be less trouble to replace than the board was to get out of the eMac in the first place.

      But... you know it's the logic board. The computer is dead because of this. You really only have the options of replacing the computer, replacing the logic board, or replacing the caps. Now, I quoted a logic board replacement on an eMac last week, and I know it's expensive, probably prohibitively so (it's at least 1.5 hours labor and a fairly expensive board) but given the computer is dead and you've already done the hard part, why not replace the caps? The worst you can do is not fix an already dead board, that you've already decided not to replace the board on.

      Of course, if you want to replace the computer anyway, a Mac mini is a great replacement - MUCH easier to work on than the eMac.

    17. Re:More than you believe by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      Scratch that.

      Announced today, the eMac Repair Extension Program for Video and Power Issues

      It sounds like that will likely cover you.

    18. Re:More than you believe by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Have you ever tried to take apart an eMac (or any of the CRT iMacs for that matter)?

  39. Lithium Ion Polymer batteries.... by GeneralEmergency · · Score: 2, Funny



    For Lithium Ion Polymer (or LiPo for short) batteries to swell like this one or more of the following has to have happened:

    1. The battery was discharged below its safe discharge voltage threshold.

    2. The battery was discharged at a current higher than the rated sustained discharge current rating.

    3. It was a boy computer placed too close to a girl computer. .,.,

    --
    "A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --
    GeneralEmergency
  40. are apparently swelling, then failing... by blindd0t · · Score: 1

    What more could one expect? That's what happens when one computer share's it peripherals with too many other computers.

    ThinkGeek already has a shirt promoting safe practices:
    http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts/coder/61be/

  41. What a Choice by helmutvs · · Score: 1

    Gee. I can either have my MacBook Pro burn my legs off (a friend told me about how he put it on his bed and it melted through the blanket!) or have the battery swell and fail. I guess the Mac really does do everything... Anyone need something ironed?

    --
    There are no uninteresting things. There are only uninterested people.
    1. Re:What a Choice by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      Melted the blanket!?! What the hell kind of blankets is your friend buying?

      Tell him to stop being so cheap, invest in natural fibers.

  42. By Storm by Joebert · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've learned not to trust anything that's white, & takes the country by storm, like Pilgrims or Cocaine, or Apple Products.

    Being white, I don't even trust myself !

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  43. Is that your battery, or are you happy to see me? by tlambert · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is that your battery, or are you happy to see me?

    -- Terry

  44. personal experience by Matey-O · · Score: 2, Interesting

    three MBP's, three batteries, all three fine.

    Now, one of the laptops lost two fans within three weeks of ownership...but that's offtopic.

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  45. Surprise! by Lord+Aurora · · Score: 1
    What's that? A major tech company doesn't make perfect products?

    Whatever will they think of next?

    Extended warranties?

    --
    The heavens do not fall for such a trifle.
    1. Re:Surprise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Apple gets a pass for shipping faulty equipment?

      I'm sick of hypocritical Mac zealots who bash PCs at every oppritunity, up to and including bashing Windows for crashing (especially pre-2000).

      When its a Mac, Apple does no wrong no matter what.

  46. Problem... by DoctorDyna · · Score: 1

    I think part of the problem here is, for many years, most people have regarded apple hardware as being superior to most of what was available for PC manufacturers to use. The reason, IMHO, that we seem to have a sudden rash of stories about apple hardware problems, be it iPod or macbook pro, is that the company is finally starting to succomb to the same thing most huge businesses do, which is "get it for less.". Once opon a time they had fantastic hardware that most PC geeks would have loved to snag and put Windows on, but they couldn't. Now, it's just a shame that the product quality is slipping at the same time that the machines become compatible with windows. Now, nobody gives a shit. 5-10 years ago I would have fallen over myself to get a Mac that ran Windows.

    --
    Windows has more viruses because linux has more virus coders.
    1. Re:Problem... by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      Apple doesn't make the batteries.

      You can't really say that this is a problem with Apple hardware. It's a problem with the batteries, not the MacBooks.

    2. Re:Problem... by XaXXon · · Score: 1

      That's not necessarily fair.

      The batteries have a certain operating envelope. If the Mac's heat put the battery outside of that range, then it's not the battery's fault.

      Either way, as a system integrator, Apple is responsible for making sure the products they ship are quality.

      If it was a third party battery that the consumer bought for themselves, then you blame the battery manufacturer.

      The way this works is that the consumer blames Apple and then Apple potentially blames the battery manufacturer (or fixes the heat issues).

    3. Re:Problem... by MassacrE · · Score: 1

      The problem is that people love controversy. Last year it was Apple the underdog making superior products to the Dells and Sonys of the world. It was OS X being virus free and fast and fun while everyone else had so many problems with XP that they would get spyware and just go throw the machine away.

      Now that Apple has 80+% of the music player market, people want to see them fail. Stories spread about hot notebooks, broken speakers, odd sounds, swelling batteries and melting AC power adapters, even though a certain percentage of manufacturing defects are impossible to avoid, and nobody has attempted to estimate whether a few blogs amount to a lot of defects or a half dozen of loud macbook pro owners and perhaps a few dozen more mac haters lying for their cause.

      You also get uncollaborated articles about apple building their devices using what amounts to basically slave labor.

      Don't worry, soon another company will be big and the new target of our angst. :)

    4. Re:Problem... by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      The assumption you've made is that the reason behind the batteries failing is due to excessive heat. There have been no reports to support this assumption.

      The earlier reports of excessive heat issues have been rectified with software updates and in some cases with the removal of a strip of plastic that have been left in the vent and wouldn't allow for proper ventilation.

      South Korean laptop battery manufacturer LG Chem is likely to run into problems securing additional orders from Apple Computer after the computer maker last month was forced to recall 128,000 of the LG Chem-made batteries. This sounds more like it's the manufacturer LG Chem, than it is Apple...

    5. Re:Problem... by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      Interestingly - and not necessarily you - I've had personal instances of 'cake and eat it' along these lines. When I was discussing how MBP's came off the same production line as Asus laptops, I was told the two couldn't be compared, apropos of anything else, because "Apple specified certain parameters for their stuff".

      So whilst they may not have manufactured anything - they're responsible for the disconnect between (as one possible cause listed above) the battery parameters, and the MBP dropping the discharge voltage below its acceptable threshold.

    6. Re:Problem... by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      I haven't read anywhere that the MBP's "dropped the discharge voltage below [their] acceptable threshold". I hope that you would direct me to the relevant information.

      I've seen a video of someone overcharging a laptop battery beyond it's threshold which caused it to swell and explode. I wouldn't have expected what you are describing to cause the effect that has happened here. I am of the impression that this problem is a very small percentage of the batteries out there and that it's due to a defect in the manufacturing process of the batteries.

    7. Re:Problem... by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Okay, this is the only one I found - http://apple.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=189243&c id=15584986 - however, re-reading it might imply a less than serious response, though your remarks on overcharging seem to correlate, too.

    8. Re:Problem... by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for pointing that out. I don't know if what that poster claims is what would happen, but I also don't know that it wouldn't...

  47. Who is the battery supplier? by Warlock7 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Probably a good idea to avoid them...

    Sad thing is that Apple gets the bad press over it.

    Here's a much more disturbing photo of one of those batteries. It was posted on Accelerate Your Mac on June 15.

    1. Re:Who is the battery supplier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple chose the supplier, so they bear some heat as far as I am concerned.

    2. Re:Who is the battery supplier? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Sad thing is that Apple gets the bad press over it.

      Umm, what? How is it possibly NOT Apple's fault for picking a crappy battery supplier?
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Who is the battery supplier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how were they supposed to know that the batteries were crappy? Magic? I doubt they can afford to do a full internal audit of the manufacturing procedures of every hardware company they buy products from.

    4. Re:Who is the battery supplier? by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      Who's to say that the supplier is "crappy"? Who's to say that it wasn't just a bad batch? South Korean laptop battery manufacturer LG Chem is likely to run into problems securing additional orders from Apple Computer after the computer maker last month was forced to recall 128,000 of the LG Chem-made batteries. Apple appears to have done the right thing and recalled them anyhow...

      These days, LG is hardly considered "crappy" in any of their endeavors, these days.

    5. Re:Who is the battery supplier? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Who's to say that the supplier is "crappy"?

      I fail to see your point. Whether "crappy" or not, by any arbitrary standards, Apple is still 100% responsible for picking them, for setting the standards, etc. and deserves whatever PR they get over being associated with them.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:Who is the battery supplier? by Warlock7 · · Score: 1
      You don't fail to see me point, you refuse to acknowledge it. You made the point about the "crappy" supplier in the first place.
      Umm, what? How is it possibly NOT Apple's fault for picking a crappy battery supplier?
      I pointed out that LG isn't considered "crappy". Certainly Apple chose them, they didn't choose a "crappy" manufacturer as you suggested, however, they picked a reputable company.

      Besides that, Apple has done their part and recalled the laptops in question to replace the batteries. They've accepted more than their share of the responsibility and they've done so at their expense both monetarily and PR-wise.

      Seemingly by your reasoning that Apple is 100% responsible LG gets to go on their merry way and do as they see fit, only suffering the loss of Apple as a customer. That's simply not right. The burden of responsibility lies upon LG as well for producing an inferior product. They should be held equally accountable if not more so.
    7. Re:Who is the battery supplier? by cybereal · · Score: 1

      Every apple laptop I've seen uses Sony batteries.

      Apple, however, designs the casing and engineers the requirements to be met at Sony's manufacturing plant for the cells themselves. Apple is still responsible if they order to the wrong specifications.

      Although more likely it was a bad batch of cells, or less likely, a problem with the charging hardware.

      --
      I read the script, and I think it would help my character's motivation if he was on fire. -Bender
    8. Re:Who is the battery supplier? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      You don't fail to see me (sic) point, you refuse to acknowledge it.

      Wrong again.

      I pointed out that LG isn't considered "crappy".

      Completely irrelevant to the point at hand. I said "crappy" not to suggest LG is, just to make a point about a company's responsibility when chosing a supplier.

      Seemingly by your reasoning that Apple is 100% responsible LG gets to go on their merry way and do as they see fit,

      I NEVER said the supplier is not responsible. That's something you just pulled out of the air.

      I'm dropping this conversation, as you're just turning into a completely nonsensical rant. Feel free to have the last word, if it makes you feel better.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    9. Re:Who is the battery supplier? by Warlock7 · · Score: 1
      I said "crappy" not to suggest LG is...
      The way that you wrote it: "...Apple's fault for picking a crappy battery supplier...", you were suggesting that LG is "crappy". The fact that you didn't know it was LG at the time is where you made your mistake. If you had written: "...Apple's fault if/when they pick a crappy battery supplier...", then what you claim would be correct, but you didn't and that's why you are wrong. If you aren't precise then you're the only one that can interpret what you write properly.
      I NEVER said the supplier is not responsible.
      Apple is still 100% responsible for picking them, for setting the standards, etc. ...
      Your use of "etc" and "100%" indicates that you felt that Apple is completely responsible for the situation. If that wasn't your intention then you should've been more clear. I didn't pull anything out of the air, I simply responded to your posts as you presented them, whether or not you presented it well or the way you intended isn't my problem. See, you've still got the same problem, you write in an ambiguous way, whether you intend to or not. That leads to situations where you are the only one that truly knows what it is that you are trying to say.
      ... you're just turning into a completely nonsensical rant...
      Call me a rant will you?!? Why I oughta... Now who's being non-sensical? :p

      Well, you're right about one thing, I do feel better having the last word. Thanks.
  48. How long ... by Procrastin8er · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...until some Apple zealot finds a way to blame this on Microsoft?

    --
    Slashdot - Where the slash is most definitely to the left.
  49. not grotesque by jaimz22 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "MacFixIt has some grotesque pictures of their own swollen MBP battery"

    Thats not grotesque you want to see grotesque, let me find that tub girl link...

  50. not just MacBook Pro by greengearbox · · Score: 1
    I currently have the issue where the machine simply turns off when the battery has reached around 30-40%, according to the operating system's battery meter.
    Funny ... I have the exact same problem on my (~3 year old) G4 Powerbook.
  51. Always someting new by Enrique1218 · · Score: 1

    I don't know if this speaks highly or lowly of Apple. Everytime I read a story about an Apple defect, it is something new and unique. Whether it is a faulty logic board, bad battery, white spots, or yellow palm rests, it is always something new. My particular notebook had a recall on it due to a faulty memory slot. At the least, it illustrates that Apple is pretty decent at troubleshooting the design to resolve errors from future generations. Also, it shows that Apple like any other PC manufacturer is only going to produce systems that are good as their individual parts.

    --
    You don't have to be smart to use a Mac, you just have to be smart enough to buy one
  52. Put it in the new mac commercials by aplusjimages · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Maybe Apple will put it in their new mac commercials, but state that it's windows that has the problem and not mac. The battery burst could be represented by the fat man's fly bursting open and stuff oozing out.

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
  53. If that isn't spin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...then I don't know what is. Congratutions, you've just turned:

    1. Apple produced failing hardware

    into

    1. there is an elite Mac culture
    2. Apple has above average hardware and support

    The first I would agree with, to an extent. They do think they're elite, whether they are or not.

    The second has no credibility without any sources.

    Thanks, but I think I'll stick with the actual story, that Apple produced faulty hardware.

    1. Re:If that isn't spin... by blzabub · · Score: 1

      Here is some evidence that Mac users are more "elite", whatever that connotes...

      http://news.com.com/2100-1040-943519.html?tag=fd _top

  54. I see it another way... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

    Every Apple hardware issue can be enumerated on Slashdot, and they can keep up with a pace of one article every few months on average. Compared to experiences I've had with... well, let's say 'other vendors' to keep the fanboys at bay, Slashdot paints a pretty rosy picture of Apple.

  55. Apple must be getting slow by epp_b · · Score: 0

    I haven't heard anything about them suing MacFixIt yet.

  56. Higher Standards = More Publicized Failures by wordsofwisedumb · · Score: 1
    That may have something to do with the quality of Apple products when they are not failing. Apple made stuff is nice. Very nice. It looks pretty, it works well, usually its intuitive. All this means that when it breaks its a big deal. Add in the price that you pay for it and it becomes a very big deal. When something goes wrong on other hardware that isn't so nice to begin with people expect it. It's like buying things from Wal-Mart, you don't expect them to last because you paid half of what you would have paid elsewhere and all it does is do the job, it doesn't do it nicely or exceptionally.

    When you hold yourself to higher quality standards and something goes wrong, it is a big deal.

  57. In Soviet Russia... by breckinshire · · Score: 1

    Apple swells you!

  58. APC UPS batteries do this sometimes too. by OgGreeb · · Score: 1

    The APC SmartUPS units I've used over the years failed this way a few times. The
    replaceable battery would swell (sometimes enough to make it impossible to remove
    from the UPS) as it failed. I understand it's the result of gas created by a
    run-down battery building pressure to the point where the case has to balloon
    to contain it. It was always surprising to me when it happened -- it seemed
    dangerous. -Gary

    --
    -- Gary Goldberg KA3ZYW 301/249-6501 AIM:OgGreeb Digital Marketing Inc., Bowie, MD //www.digimark.net/
    1. Re:APC UPS batteries do this sometimes too. by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      Yeah, lead acid gel cells do this in UPSs - I recently found my "under the desk" UPS (some cheapo CyberPower unit) not working (as in, it wouldn't turn on at all, system completely down) - pulled it apart (figuring it needed a new battery, minimum) - the battery in it was swollen and CRACKED. A quick trip to Fry's and $20.00 later, my UPS (and system) was back up running nicely.


      The kicker to all of this is the number of "dead" UPSs I have seen that people have thrown away, without simply trying to replace the battery. Usually, when I find them, I dig them out, replace the battery, and have a nice UPS for the cost of a battery or two - typically, the batteries cost no more than $10-20.00, depending on the size and such. Typical consumers, though, so I am not really surprised...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  59. So.... by ral8158 · · Score: 0

    Is this the 'New Mac Porn' version of Goatse?

  60. You have got to be kidding by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    "grotesque pictures"!? Where's the alien goo? What a wimp! I bet he would vomit at the sight of an open can of refried beans.

    --
    What?
  61. What? by Luscious868 · · Score: 1

    What? Problems with a first generation laptop? No ..... This is exactly why the same rules apply to hardware as apply to software, sit the first generation out and let other people deal with the inevitable problems that will occur.

  62. "Have a swell day" by Infonaut · · Score: 1

    No wonder nobody says that these days.

    *ducks*

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  63. Re:You're kidding, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Name one problem with Linux that isn't solved by having someone else decide what you will and will not use? Coming from OSX, the "insert favorite app here is not on Linux" is not a showstopper.

    "The user interface is inconsistent": KDE or Gnome not both, problem solved.
    "It is ever so hard to install": Knoppix, problem solved. If not, the poster will probably be installing it anyway, problem solved.
    "There are 5000 different text editors": solved by the poster picking one and installing it. ... and so on.

  64. Its obvious... by Ixitar · · Score: 1
    For Lithium Ion Polymer (or LiPo for short) batteries ...
    You apply LiPosuction to fix the problem.

    *ducking*
  65. Without the build quality, why the high price by DrXym · · Score: 1

    Previously if ever the price of a Mac was mentioned, you can bet someone would explain how the premium ensured build quality. Recently (the last 2-3 years), the build quality of certain Macs and certain iPods has been pretty superficial. You get a snazzy looking laptop that is too hot to put on your lap (it's not a laptop, it's a notebook!), where the battery pops (from the heat), and if you go for the cheaper model it turns yellow after a few weeks. So what was the high price for again? Certainly not for the quality it seems.

  66. anomolies? by a_greer2005 · · Score: 1
    I hear so much about this bad Apple hardware, yet I have never seen it outside of a freind of a friend who had a bad ibook logic board which was happily replaced. I wonder if these extreme heat issues, bad batteries and such may be isolated cases; make a million of anything and a few dozen are bound to be screw ups, which can simply be replaced, that is what warenties are for.


    could it be that Apple users are more apt to go into forums or make a blog about bad hardware than a Dell or HP user?

  67. Can we please stop this? by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

    Every time a single user finds an isolated manufacturing defect in a product from Apple, a hellstorm is raised. Often, these problems are not widespread or are only borne out of unrealistic expectations (the latter is partly Apple's fault through their marketing.) For example, this battery issue is probably a previously unknown quality control issue at the battery manufacturer Apple uses. No doubt other computer makers use the same batteries in their laptops.

    When you make 200,000+ of something, yeah, some of them are going to have parts that may take some time to fail and thus are not caught by quality control. You don't see people doing this to Dell or IBM, they just RMA the damn thing and get another.

    1. Re:Can we please stop this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think a large part of problem is raised expectation level derived in part from the geek-herds slavish devotion to all things Apple, higher than reasonable prices charged for spectacularly well designed and desirable (although averagely configured) kit which is then compounded by shock engendered by patchy, minimalist & somewhat opaque service offered by Apple in dealing with customer issues arising from major faults occurring well inside MTBF. Apple shock bites the geek hard, and they will whine. Difficult to accept perhaps but Apple is JAFC.

    2. Re:Can we please stop this? by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      I've had issues with Apple gear before, and their customer service has been great. Send your stuff in for RMA and you get it back within a week; most PC manufacturers are not so fast. Sure, they generally won't tell you what's wrong, but they will send you a new one. And Apple's machines aren't as extravagantly priced as people like to say. Compared to any major manufacturer (so exclude those brand-X notebooks from Japan/Korea/China,) Apple stuff is generally about $100-200 more, but comes with tangible features that make it worth that to some people (motion sensors, built in camera, ambient light sensor for the backlit keyboard, etc.) But yeah, they are JAFC and if people knew that going in they wouldn't be so shocked when things break.

      Let me say this; Apple has *always* been forthcoming and quick with recalls about defects in their PCs. The iPod is a notable exception; it is a consumer electronics device sold on much lower margin (thus allowing less room for customer service and recalls.) We've all seen the recall formula from Fight Club, and it doesn't just apply in the auto industry.

  68. This is perfectly acceptable. by smart.id · · Score: 1

    The kind of people who buy these things are willing to let battery acid burn their penis away if it means keeping their uber-cool notebook on their lap.

    --
    blog & fiction: jd87
  69. Re:You're kidding, right? by flimflammer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How about:
    "Shoddy drivers make using various hardware painful to use. Wifi for example has only just recently seen improvement"
    "The shell is not user friendly unless you know what you're doing, and chances are you'll be using the shell quite a bit"
    "If a problem arises, chances are slim to nil they're going to know how to fix it, and while this can happen in any OS, Linux is one of the worst to fix if you don't know what you're doing, otherwise you'll wind up checking through forums desperately trying to find an answer"

    There's a difference between liking Linux and knowing linux, and I wager a guess if he had it installed, he wouldn't know where to begin. So him going Mac > Linux seems like doomsday.

  70. Insightful??? TROLL!!! by mangu · · Score: 1
    I think its amazing you'd expect your neighbor to make the leap from a Mac to Linux.


    Why do you think that? Some things that are easy in Linux are even easier in a Mac, I'll grant you that, but if you had tried using any modern Linux you'd know that Linux is better for anyone who is a moderate to heavy computer user. If you do anything more than sending pictures of your cat to your mom or if you use applications other than Photoshop, Linux is more powerful than a Mac.

    ...or maybe even Windows?


    Oh, c'mon! He didn't say it was a game machine, did he?

    1. Re:Insightful??? TROLL!!! by Yosho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why do you think that? Some things that are easy in Linux are even easier in a Mac, I'll grant you that, but if you had tried using any modern Linux you'd know that Linux is better for anyone who is a moderate to heavy computer user. If you do anything more than sending pictures of your cat to your mom or if you use applications other than Photoshop, Linux is more powerful than a Mac.

      Gotta disagree here. I spend 14+ hours a day at a computer, a good chunk of which is spend developing software (in C++, Python, and Java, primarily), and I'd say that OS X and Linux are roughly equally "powerful" (although that's an incredibly vague term), but simple things take much less work to accomplish on a Mac. Admittedly, I don't care about compiling my entire GUI from source or testing out the latest alpha version of some KDE widget, I just want to get my work done.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    2. Re:Insightful??? TROLL!!! by mangu · · Score: 1
      I'd say that OS X and Linux are roughly equally "powerful" (although that's an incredibly vague term), but simple things take much less work to accomplish on a Mac


      For me, there are two things that make Linux more powerful than a Mac. One is the number of options. Can't do it this way, try that way. You aren't forced to do things the same way everybody does, there may be another more efficient way to do the particular type of work that you do.


      The second thing I like about Linux that commercial software doesn't offer is the liberty of trying and testing software from a vast repository. With synaptic or adept, available in any Debian-like Linux, you have tens of thousands of software packets which you can install with a couple of mouse clicks. Installing software on the Mac is also very easy, but you have to get that software before you start installing. It's like a yellow mangosteen butter recipe, very easy to prepare, but where can I get three yellow mangosteens? If you have to find a company to sell you the software and order or download it before you start the installation, this negates a large part of that ease in the installation process itself.

    3. Re:Insightful??? TROLL!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Google on DarwinPorts and Fink. These are very similar to apt-get on Debian.

      Just about every major package for Linux is available as a Mac installer, and the ones that aren't generally build from source just fine (stuff that interfaces with the graphics or sound systems sometimes requires some modification, but strict command-line stuff generally works right out of the box... ./configure, make, make install, and you're done).

    4. Re:Insightful??? TROLL!!! by Yosho · · Score: 2, Informative

      One is the number of options. Can't do it this way, try that way. You aren't forced to do things the same way everybody does, there may be another more efficient way to do the particular type of work that you do.

      That's a completely theoretical argument. Could you name some exact situations where OS X forced you to do something that was not as efficient as it could have been if they had given you multiple options? If we're just talking theory, then it could also be said that it doesn't matter how many options there are to do something as long as the best one is available. If the best one can be presented, then what's the point in offering less efficient options?

      With synaptic or adept, available in any Debian-like Linux, you have tens of thousands of software packets which you can install with a couple of mouse clicks. Installing software on the Mac is also very easy, but you have to get that software before you start installing.

      Simply not true. With Fink or DarwinPorts, you can install software in the same way that programs like apt-get handle it. While they don't have quite as many packages in them as Debian's repositories, they've still got more than most people would ever need to install; if there's something they don't have, there's nothing stopping you from downloading and compiling it yourself. Sure, there are a few programs that don't work -- but the whole point of the open source community is that surely there's another option you can use, right?

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    5. Re:Insightful??? TROLL!!! by alienw · · Score: 1

      You are a retard. Linux fucking blows for anyone but a Linux nerd. Even with the latest version of Ubuntu you have to go about hacking text files if you want to, say, use a wireless network (that uses WPA, as almost all of them do). Or how about you try setting up a VPN connection. Or (god forbid) if the installer doesn't detect your display resolution correctly. Or just the procedure for installing videocard drivers (god help you if you have an ATI card). It's a fucking giant pain in the ass, and it's a total piece of shit compared to a Mac.

    6. Re:Insightful??? TROLL!!! by Golias · · Score: 1

      That's a completely theoretical argument. Could you name some exact situations where OS X forced you to do something that was not as efficient as it could have been if they had given you multiple options?

      Don't hold your breath waiting for an answer to that one.

      There's also the fact that the Mac does indeed offer multiple ways of going about things, it's just that they typical Windows or Linux bigot never clicks around on a Mac long enough to discover them, choosing instead to throw up their hands and say "it's too limiting!!!1!"

      Don't want to delete a file by grabbing it and dragging it to the trash? Fine, right-click (or control-click) on it, and select on "Move to trash" from the menu that pops up, just like how Windows does it. Or go to the command line and use bash commands, just like how I'm sure Linus Torvalds (a.k.a. "God Himself) would do it. You've got plenty of options, so quitcherbitchin. :P

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  71. No swelling, but mine did fail. by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Just yesterday I got it replaced at the local Apple Store.

    My hardware:
      First gen MacBook Pro 2.0 GHz (shipped the first week,) with 2 GB of RAM and the 7200 RPM hard drive. All firmware updates applied, running Boot Camp. (95% of the time in OS X, 5% in XP.)

    My symptoms:
    1. The computer would go to sleep, but wouldn't wake up. I would have to remove the battery, replace it, then plug the computer into the wall, to get it to turn back on. (I would *NOT* wake up from safe sleep, but would turn on from scratch.) This started out as an occasional thing, but eventually got to the point where it happened every time.
    2. Then it would start randomly turning off during use, and wouldn't turn back on unless I was plugged in to power. If I shut it off, it would start up off the battery, though.
    3. Then it would not run off the battery any more, but it did say the battery was there.
    4. Finally, it wouldn't even acknowledge that there was a battery. Tried resetting power manager, re-flashing the firmware, etc. No help. The battery's LEDs said it had a full charge, but the computer wouldn't even attempt to start on battery power.

    This whole process occurred over about two weeks.

    So I took it to an Apple Store's Genius Bar, and they did some diagnostics, then finally declared it a bad battery. (The Genius hadn't heard of any company-acknowledged failures that covered this.) Swapped my battery for a brand new one (straight off the sales shelf,) and went on my way. (I bought a second at the same time, simply because I had been wanting a second battery anyway.)
    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
  72. Glossy Screen by Quantum+Fizz · · Score: 1
    Regarding the glossy screen, I am wondering two things. Note that I don't use a laptop.

    Regarding the glossy screen, I thought this was primarily to compare to Apple's competitors. Ie, I was under the impression that most other laptops are glossy screened, and that many Apple customers were annoyed that Apple only had the matte screen. Are the other laptops you prefer over the macbook also glossy screened?

    Secondly, I read somewhere that glossy screens can actually be BETTER than matte screens for use in bright sunlight. Since the screen is flat, you can adjust the screen to not get the sunlight glare in your face. But the matte screen will scatter sunlight no matter which general angle you're at. Additionally, my glass-faced CRT right now is convex-curved, so that means any light behind me will put a glare on the screen, and angling the screen won't fix it since it's convex.

    Anyway, I am similar to you in that I didn't like using macs at all until OS X came out, which I now love (I was a linux fan before this). But my GF has a mac mini which I use, and has no hardware problems, so I'm blissfully unaware of laptop hardware issues, and just get to enjoy the OS X goodness. :-)

    1. Re:Glossy Screen by Zaphod2016 · · Score: 1

      Before this I had an Inspiron 6000 (Dell), which I *thought* had a matte screen. The MBP certainly did.

      Between 12-3p, when the sun is overhead, I can't read the MB screen to save my life. Currently it is 7p, and I am outside, and can read it just fine. However, considering all these heat issues, this might be a *feature*. Being that the battery is currently sitting directly on my groin, its probably better not to push it.

  73. We use LiPo batteries for radio control planes... by nzgeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We use LiPo batteries for radio control planes, and many of us have experienced swelling, and eventually combustion, because of the abuse that we put the batteries through. We demand massive current output to drive high-wattage brushless motors, and then get frustrated and charge the batteries at higher-than recommended currents so we can get out flying again.

    Then there's the whole cottage industry of R/C flyers buying 'bare cells' and soldering together frankenstein combinations of cells in series and parallel to get the perfect size/voltage/weight battery for the plane we are building.

    So in other words it comes as no surprise to me that LiPos in consumer products are swelling (and exploding) as the capacities and loads are increased, and as manufacturing perhaps gets shoddier as supply demand increases.

    As I mention here, the more power you need, the more energy you need to store in a battery, and the higher the likelihood of some sort of catastrophic failure.

  74. Combine it! by UltraAyla · · Score: 1

    Combine this with that program that makes lightsaber noises based upon the motion sensor, and I'd call it a feature! 1500 dollars for an exploding lightsaber seems kind of cheap!

    Also, on another note - Apple HAS recalled batteries in the past for G4 laptops. It makes me wonder what it eventually will take for there to be a full scale recall of the Macbook batteries.

  75. And the Mac appologists continue by spoco2 · · Score: 1

    We had people go ape about how terrible Dell is over those two photos of ONE incident with NO futher information as to how it occured, NO information as to whether the user had done anything stupid to their machine.

    And yet here we have Apple having yet more issues with their machines, on a wide scale, and doing nothing about it, and people say... "yeah... well... others have problems too".

    Face it, Apples are nice machines, but they are in NO WAY perfect or the holy grail of computing that so many of you seem to think they are.

  76. I don't care by Watersplash · · Score: 1

    I still want one :(

  77. Apple gets more attention here - good and bad by MojoStan · · Score: 1
    If this happened to Dell, or Compaq, or random-nonname-clone, this wouldn't be news.
    Dell, Compaq, et al don't have their products hyped on Slashdot's front page (Main section, not just the Apple section) when they are announced, again when they are actually shipped a month later, again when they are benchmarked, again when they are reviewed, again when a blog suggests their product might be the "fasted Windows XP notebook", again when someone develops an app to turn your product into a lightsaber, ... you get the idea.

    Because its Apple, there's shock and dismay. Perhaps because people have a higher expectation of Apple, or a lower expectation of PC hardware?
    Expectations are probably just one reason for the "shock and dismay." But I think expectations are raised because of Slashdot's frequent, perhaps excessive, coverage of this specific product. If all those other MacBook Pro stories are worthy of making the front Main page, then potential defects like this should also make the front page.

    Maybe Apple products should not get so much attention outside of the apple.slashdot.org section. Since these stories get so many comments, maybe they should.

    --
    TO START
    PRESS ANY KEY

    Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

  78. Holy crap man, get some memory! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    Trying not to be an Apple apologist here, but 512 MB is NOT enough for what you are doing. Apple even says so. When you order a Macbook online, the "Learn more" link above the memory selection says:
    • Choose the standard 512MB of memory (two 256MB modules) to support most day-to-day tasks such as email, word processing, spreadsheets, web browsing, and basic iLife '06 tasks.
    • Upgrade to 1GB of memory (two 512MB modules) if you edit large photos, create illustrations, or build complex presentations.
    • Choose the 2GB option (two 1GB modules) if you plan to use your system regularly for sound design, video editing, DVD authoring, animation, and other intensive tasks.

    Based on the fact that you use Photoshop (memory hog + Rosetta = double plus good memory hog), 1 GB is minimum. 2 GB isn't much more expensive and it's waaaaaay better.

    On the glossy screen, I thought I would hate it. But I find it's actually better than a matte screen outdoors in the sun. Just don't sit so that the sun is behind you and reflecting on the screen, and the image will be more crisp. Meanwhile, the matte washes out easily in that light.

    YMMV.
  79. Misunderstanding! by 1336.5 · · Score: 0

    Apple attaches a price to all of its repairs. If a genius tech tells you the superdrive needs to be replaced and its 400.00 for example, if the machine is covered under applecare, applecare is charged 400 bucks, not you. Some people misunderstand apples repair process, but they have to keep track of how much repairs cost them.They just charge them to the users specific applecare account... which doesnt cost the user anything - other than buying applecare.

    1. Re:Misunderstanding! by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      No. They asked for my credit card details to cover the repair cost, and specifically said it not covered by warranty.

  80. Heat from Apple portables by beaverfever · · Score: 1

    I'll start with some disclaimers: I don't own a Macbook Pro, I don't engineer portable computers, and I have only ever owned one portable computer in my life, a 12" Powerbook 867.

    A previous Macfixit article, "MacBook Special Report: Excessive heat: Usage notes, cooling pads and more" (which is now in the subscription-only archives) mentioned MacBook temps getting to and over 67C

    I own a first generation 12" Powerbook, the machine which was the previous Apple whipping-boy for overheating issues. I never experienced the warping/twisting frame problem 12" Powerbooks suffered, which was blamed on heat. My personal experience has been that use of the machine at a temperature over 59C at the CPU can cause the Combo drive to cease functioning and kernal panics related to the internal modem. The hottest I ever saw my 12" Powerbook get was 63C, when burning a series of CDs with the computer placed on a bed. I used the app Temperature Monitor to identify these problems and prevent recurrances.

    If it's now considered normal for MacBooks to reach 67C and higher at the CPU, then quite frankly I'm not surprised that there are hardware issues, and I wonder how surprised the engineers at Apple are.

  81. The macbook is not the only one with problems :( by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    My experience in PC laptops has been very broad; my last 5 where all Compaqs and the last 2 sucked even more than a webPC would do on a programmers desk regarding heating issues, screen and mobo issues, etc..

    I've bought myself a Powerbook in December; asked for a QWERTY keyboard and went to the shop (FNAC) once they told it was in. It seemed the keyboard was an AZERTY keyboard + the right enter sometimes didn't take its hit; so I asked them to order another model with the right keyboard. In January I get a call to get the new Powerbook; went immediately to the store; switched it on, restored my backup; everything looked "ok" to me...

    1 day later I get a sudden lockup; like one of the many I get; it just locks up; no cursor movements; the only key that responds is the power key. Not only I've been haunted with this problem for the last 3 months; the machine also spews errors like kernel panics, gray screen-mentioning-a-crash-in-all-languages and the spinning ball of death.

    This is my first Apple; have been a PC user for 15 years; I got to say my first Powerbook was a relieve compared to this "new switched" one; although I first have to use it to finish my projects before I can go return it to the shop and loose it for 2 to 4 weeks. I already went to the Apple store with it and they seem not to know about any related problems; a cooling stand does not work (but does cool this powerbook down remarkably; without fans...

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  82. WHO CARES!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Apple fanboys get screwed, to me its just a good laugh. I never have bought Apple and never will, so why should I care?

  83. More photos of battery problem by jjrjj · · Score: 2, Informative

    CNET.com.au also has an article on this issue (with photos): http://cnet.com.au/laptops/laptops/0,39035649,4006 3900,00.htm

  84. Heat and burst batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The damn computer runs too damn hot. Excessive heat in the environment makes the battery swell, leading to structural failure in the case. Apple lemmings should stop making excuses for Apple (which is a fucking for-profit company, for fuck's sake). I almost bought one of these things but held off a few days to read the forums and, sure enough...

  85. Remember right before they shipped? by TJamieson · · Score: 1

    Problems with batteries, specific to the MBP iirc... damn I wish I had the link

    --
    For the last time, PIN Number and ATM Machine are redundancies!
  86. Re:You're kidding, right? by SaDan · · Score: 1

    Ubuntu can keep him away from the command line, and x86 hardware is cheaper and easier to maintain than Mac hardware. If you didn't follow the thread, he's on his third Mac because the previous two failed.

    I support Mac OS X, various forms of Linux, and Windows systems where I work. The Mac hardware and Mac OS X systems are definately the most annoying to deal with, and cost a great deal more (and do a great deal less) than the Linux and Windows workstations.

    I don't think it's much of a stretch for someone who's used either a Windows PC or a Mac to switch to Linux, IF they can be happy using the applications available under Linux. Sometimes you gotta run one or the other based on the job (which is the only reason we have the Macs).

  87. Why would they do it that way? by Pink+Tinkletini · · Score: 1

    That's horribly unintuitive. A customer has no reason to care about the cost of a repair that's covered under warranty. If they want to know, go ahead and tell them, but if you're saying Apple automatically vomits this information at customers coming in for repairs, that's a recipe for confusion.

  88. Re:You're kidding, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, some people are very unlucky, I haven't had a Mac fail beyond a point where you can't swap out the HD, except once where it was sent in within warrenty and came back and is working strongly, that was 4 years ago with an iBook. Besides that, it is x86 hardware now, and lots of sites are saying the MacBook is giving others a run for their money.

  89. Root causes by DragonHawk · · Score: 1

    The thing I don't get is why everyone is pointing directly at Apple/Dell/HP/etc. Lately, it seems like a month can't go by without a news story about some manufacturer having trouble with either their laptop power adapters or their laptop batteries overheating. I'm thinking the problem isn't Dell/Apple/HP/etc per se, but the el cheapo batteries and power electronics they all must be buying. It's not like the big OEMs actually make this stuff themselves these days. So it's just like the capacitor plague of a few years ago -- cheap but faulty parts flood the market, all the OEMs buy them up, excrement his the air circulator.

    Of course, the manufacturers do bear some responsibility for this, since it's ultimately their product. Yet this appears to be an industry-wide problem. Why no flames against the battery suppliers? Why no flames against *consumers*, for favoring lower prices instead of better quality control?

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  90. Oblig: Hello, I'm a Mac by kestasjk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mac- Hello I'm a Mac

    PC- And I'm a PC

    Mac- Y'Know I can do a lot of fun stuff like arrange pictures and--

    PC- Err what's that huge lump growing out of your side? And why are your clothes covered with yellow stains?

    --
    // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    1. Re:Oblig: Hello, I'm a Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Mac- Oog, sorry, I think one of my batteries is going bad...

      PC- *explodes in a fiery conflagration on some poor Japanese business executive's desk*

  91. Heat issues - Windows sharing by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 4, Interesting


    For what it's worth, I found that my Mac Book Pro was running hot, and was consistently idling at 40% cpu activity, when there didn't seem to be anything consuming that much cpu as far as top was telling me.

    It appears to have been caused by having Windows Sharing turned on. It was using that many cycles even when I was at home with no Windows machines on the network.

    When I turned off Windows Sharing, the cpu usage dropped to single digits, and the laptop has been running much cooler.

    Your mileage may vary, of course, but it might be something worth looking at if your laptop runs hot.

    --
    September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  92. CNet asks, "Time for a recall?" by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1
    Pics of CNet.com.au's own bulging Macbook:

    http://cnet.com.au/laptops/laptops/0,39035649,4006 3900,00.htm

    No report on whether the bulge makes things snappier. ;-)

  93. Swelling and failing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Swelling and failing! This is an area where slashbots have tons of experience! Girls on the other hand... not so much so... unless of course you count *the other hand* as a girl.

  94. Two MBPs here with swollen batteries by russiste · · Score: 1

    Both MacBook Pros are 2Ghz, purchased on the date of the announcement (January 10th).

    Two days ago, both computers shut down suddenly (at different moments, obviously) while still showing about 10-20% juice left. In one of the cases (my computer), it corrupted the hard drive so badly that I had to erase it completely (this is after trying DiskWarrior from a G4 with the MBP in FireWire target mode, trying TechTool, Disk Utility, and the help of a very kind, but nonetheless baffled Genius (at Apple's downtown SF retail store)).

    Now, I took a look at the batteries, and both are swelled.

    The computers are still great, Windows still runs fine... for the next few hours, we'll run it straight from AC power and see what the Apple Store has to say.

    Good luck to everyone dealing with this issue.

    --
    Loopsh of fury.
  95. Professor MacSnappier explains it all for you... by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 4, Funny
    While to the untrained eye this much-exaggerated swelling and overheating might seem problematic, Mac users are taking it all in stride. Across the MacOSXisphere, we're harnessing the power of OS X to leverage our expectations, cushion the shock, podcast prayers for Steve and see us through what's already come to be known as the Battle of the Bulge. I know for a fact that somewhere, Mac evangelist Dave Schroeder is preparing a 5,000-word Slashdot post that will have us weeping with joy and mods handing out Insightful points faster than pimps working the art of the compliment at the bus station. Meanwhile, later today I'll be releasing iDontseeanybulgedoyouseeanybulge? v2.0, my new zen koan widget for Tiger, which depicts raindrops landing in a rippling pool as a mellow, golden Wine Country voice endlessly intones: "Swelling batteries only make me stronger." Share it with someone you love ($29.99).

    Bottom line, you Windoze and *nix folks: don't think you can poke fun. We're strong, we're united, we love our meringue-tinged MacBooks and MacBulger Pros and we'll continue to love them even if they start to fill out in back like John Merrick, the Elephant Man. It could be worse; we could be stuck on Dell machines getting carpal tunnel from jamming our trackpad fingers on that impossible START button found in the left corner of XP--now, there's a basis for a recall if ever there was one. I weep for you poor, START-bound Windoze users. And Linux? Please, Spock. Understand: nobody licks a prompt. Nobody.

  96. Swelling and Failing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Swelling and Failing?

    I think I have one of those blasted batteries in my underpant, it has an annoying tendency to leak glue just before failing.

  97. Let's not start the blanket generalizations by Moraelin · · Score: 1
    Could you imagine a typical PC user complaining that he can hear the fan running in his PC from "over three feet away". Of course not, noisy PCs are normal but audiable niose from an Apple product causes Apple user's to complain.


    I'm a PC user all right, and, yes, a noisy computer annoys me too. And there's a healthy market in soundproofing kits, 3rd party GPU coolers, silent fans, watercooling kits, or computers without fans like the Hush PC or Zalman's TNN (Totally No Noise) cases, saying that I'm not the only one. Noise levels have played an increasingly important part of the PC's evolution in the last years, and spawned stuff like:

    - fluid bearings for HDD's, which now have become the norm

    - temperature controlled fans everywhere (again, fluid or ceramics bearing are increasingly more used)

    - higher efficiency PSUs that don't need as much airflow to stay cool (and also moved to slow 120mm fans)

    - cases with _much_ better airflow at lower fan RPM

    - desktop motherboards that take low-voltage notebook CPUs, e.g., Pentium M

    - the new Samsung Flash "HDDs"

    Etc.

    So basically if your image of the average PC owner is someone who's sitting next to something that sounds like a leafblower and feeling proud of his l33t turbo-cooled overclocked rig... you may wish to re-evaluate it.
    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  98. Apple's version of the Pinto by wbhauck · · Score: 1

    Where's Ralph Nader when you need him?!

  99. And it's also funny... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    ...that I forgot to put the word "online" in there, as in, "prices on the online Apple store are also subsidizing the overhead on the Apple store." Now we both get to look like morons.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  100. Never been a problem. by Stu+Charlton · · Score: 1

    I owned a Powerbook G3 Bronze Keyboard, first gen 15-inch Powerbook G4 Titanium 500mgz, first gen 17-inch Powerbook G4 1ghz, and now a first gen 15-inch MacBook Pro 2 ghz.

    I've had no problems with any of them, they were very reliable computers. Until the MacBook Pro. My battery has cut out three times in the 3 months I've owned the laptop, 2 being in the last week -- I will be seeking a replacement bettery. On the bright side it's not swollen (yet).

    --
    -Stu
  101. Apple came through for you (and your friend) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd love to mod you up, but then Apple came along and provided a repair extension program for that eMac. In other words, yes, Apple is still the friendlier, better company to deal with. It'd be nice if they never had that capacitor problem, but there's only so much control of the supply chain that one can have, and they're honorable enough to fix their mistakes. They're even reimbursing people who already paid for the repair out-of-pocket. It's about all I can ask; I don't know about you.

  102. What service exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What was the source of the bad service, or, perhaps, what sources failed to provide good service? Apple retail, AppleCare, or a CompUSA mini-store? What kind of service were you looking for?

    1. Re:What service exactly? by pVoid · · Score: 1
      AppleCare and apple certified technicians.

      But in general, it's apple. All of these people are certified by apple, they are enacting Apple's will, and while they are polite and courteous, they do apply the apple policy: when I asked them about the whining noise, they said "oh yeah, Apple doesn't recognize this as a problem officially".

      In other words, they know about it, Apple most probably knows about it, but officially, it's not a problem and we shouldn't be worried about it. I don't like those jedi mindtricks. When I say my computer is freezing up, or my computer is making a high pitch noise, I know it is. So say "we don't have a fix yet", but not "that's not true".

      This is especially problematic since Apple is a hardware vendor.

  103. I had this problem by Simon+Spero · · Score: 1

    I had this happen to me on my week 1 Macbook Pro. I got a replacement under warranty at the local Apple Store without much fuss.

    Towards the end the machine wouldn't sit flat - like typing on a weeble.

  104. I think it's more than half a dozen by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

    I'm seeing more and more stories about the swelling/failing batteries, and guess what? My battery is swelling too now. I noticed it after taking it out to look at the battery after the laptop would randomly shut off for no reason whatsoever.

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.