Slashdot Mirror


Ubuntu Dell $50 Cheaper Than Vista Dell

rhinokitty writes "Dell recently announced that their Ubuntu systems will be $50 cheaper than similar systems running Vista (Home Basic Edition). This will be a good fork in the road for those people who need a little extra push to take hold of their dreams and run Linux."

389 comments

  1. "Take hold of their dreams"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Please... If it was really anyone's dream to run Linux, I don't think $50 more on a Dell PC is going to stop them.

    1. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by Mistlefoot · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dreams. Ubuntu is the best. It runs this laptop without a Battery!!! And without a battery $50 isn't much savings. lol

      I'm guessing this is a typo....but from the article -

      $774 Inspiron 1420 (Ubuntu)
      Intel® Core(TM) 2 Duo T5250 (1.5GHz/667Mhz FSB/2MB cache)
      Ubuntu version 7.04
      Anti-glare, widescreen 14.1 inch display (1280x800)
      Intel Graphics Media Accelerator X3100
      1GB Shared Dual Channel DDR2 at 667MHz
      80GB SATA Hard Drive (5400RPM)
      24X CD Burner/DVD Combo Drive
      Intel® 3945 802.11a/g Mini-card
      Integrated High Definition Audio

      $824 Inspiron 1420 (Vista)
      Intel® Core(TM) 2 Duo T5250 (1.5GHz/667Mhz FSB/2MB cache)
      Genuine Windows® Vista Home Basic Edition
      Anti-glare, widescreen 14.1 inch display (1280x800)
      Intel Graphics Media Accelerator X3100
      1GB Shared Dual Channel DDR2 at 667MHz
      80GB SATA Hard Drive (5400RPM)
      24X CD writer/DVD Combo Drive
      Intel® 3945 802.11a/g Mini-card
      56Whr Lithium Ion Battery (6 cell)
      Integrated High Definition Audio

    2. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wow, no batteries! I can't believe they snuck power generation into the kernel. Tesla would be proud.

    3. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not a battery, it's called a soul-sucking device. The sole reason why Vista is able to operate on these puny laptops, otherwise you had to wait for quantum computing.

    4. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by catwh0re · · Score: 1

      ..or build it yourself and save a few hundred dollars.

    5. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by sconeu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      With a LAPTOP?????

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    6. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by catwh0re · · Score: 1

      If the make-or-break difference is $50, then they're probably not buying a laptop. Even so, you can get cheaper laptops at other vendors than Dell.

      But to keep the fuse burning:
      NOW THAT WOULD BE TAKING HOLD OF MY DREAMS!!!1111SIN(90)

    7. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by redcane · · Score: 1

      yep, there are more and more companies offering "Barebones" DIY laptops... Add ram CPU, video modules... The hardware is modular, not quite as much range as for desktops.... And you have to take into account not just what sort of performance you need from the machine, but how much power your components use... But yeah, you can do this now.

    8. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I think that the point is that it's no longer more expensive to get a Linux box from Dell than it is to get a windows box from Dell, nuke the Windows partition (and thus lose even hardware support) and install Linux. -- or get the same box sans OS*, and install Linux yourself.

      I will note that even just resizing the Windows partition for your 120GB hard drive to make room for a 20GB Linux install is enough to cause the Dell nuke-Windows-and-reinstall script to freak out and stop.

      (* Yeah, I'm discounting FreeDos as a legitimate OS -- Have you ever even heard of someone [other than a FreeDos developer] actually leaving their FreeDos partition permanently on their machine and using it as anything other than a launching point for installing another OS and/or claiming HW support from Dell?_

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    9. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > NOW THAT WOULD BE TAKING HOLD OF MY DREAMS!!!1111SIN(90)

      I love you.
      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!

    10. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFL
      He get's it, who is that little guy anyway?

    11. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by FST777 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, I do. I generally have a 4G FreeDOS partition somewhere on my drives. It's one of the four OS'es I have on my system. I use it to troubleshoot, run old games, inspect old floppies, create those whacky Compaq BIOS floppies for some old systems I encounter, etc. Quite usefull at times (and DOS has its beauties). Besides that, the partition is used to swap data between FreeBSD, openSUSE and WinXP.

      Your main point stands though.

      --
      Free beer is never free as in speech. Free speech is always free as in beer.
    12. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by timesearch · · Score: 0

      Quite true. I've been asking the same question for over 20 years now.... since Linux is so inexpensive to purchase, why isn't it present on a higher percentage of desktops (what, about 1% or less ?) ?

    13. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by Gearoid_Murphy · · Score: 2, Funny

      its well known that linux users can power their laptops from the sheer sense of anti-establishment smugness, vista, on the other hand, requires several batteries to be sacrificed on an altar before it even considers booting.

      --
      prepare the survey weasels.
    14. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by gmack · · Score: 1

      FreeDos isn't intended by Dell to be a real OS. It's just there so that Dell Can offer an OS they know they won't ever have to support so that they can tell Microsoft that they don't offer machines without an OS.

      It's an end run around Microsoft. Microsoft has a hissyfit whenever vendors offer OSless boxes so they block that option but they can't object to FreeDos without having antitrust regulators breathing down their necks.

    15. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by JoeZ99 · · Score: 1

      Oh my, the point is that actually a machine with linux should be cheaper, just because ubuntu is free.

        We're all clapping our hands because it's 50 bucks cheaper?? I'm pretty disappointed, because that means most of the time before now, dell has tried to get some extra bucks when "selling" linux laptops (and don't tell me it's because they foresee the support nightmare that is coming, which is not)

      So I'd say hooray for them , but not because this is encouraging anybody to buy more linux, but because this is one step closer to the customer getting back to the usual I-pay-for-the-things-I-buy-nothing-more-nothing-le ss deal.

    16. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1

      >> get a windows box from Dell, nuke the Windows partition (and thus lose even hardware support) and install Linux When you get your computer serviced under Dell hardware support, you get to keep the battery and the hard disk. They never have a chance to know what's on your hard disk unless you tell them.

    17. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by Phisbut · · Score: 4, Funny

      Quite true. I've been asking the same question for over 20 years now.... since Linux is so inexpensive to purchase, why isn't it present on a higher percentage of desktops (what, about 1% or less ?) ?

      Funny that you've been asking that question for over 20 years now, since Linux (the kernel) has only been released 16 years ago...

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    18. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by mcfedr · · Score: 1

      no with a huge beige (or black, for extreme people) box and a 17" monitor, and a keyboard under there arm and a mouse in there mouth trying to run down the street...im thinking a laptop sounds like a good idea now...

    19. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by SunTzuWarmaster · · Score: 1

      I've used it for the same thing... booting from a CD-rom. with a 40gb hard drive, I don't get 4gb to spare as a "just in case I need to inspect an old floppy" partition.

    20. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by timesearch · · Score: 0

      Ya, should have been more precise. I included a direct predecessor to linux derived from Berkley Unix in my "over 20 years" time period. For those who don't know, linux was not the first small machine unix port. But its the most easily accessible one today.

      I ran it a long time. Ran Quakeworld Team Fortress on it back in the day for a server hosted at an ISP (for tournaments, etc.) I remember brainstorming with a friend to hack the kernel to get it to run in MP mode since the machine had 2 processors. We *almost* got it right, but messed up a small detail which corrupted the indexes after about a week. Heh.

      Nonetheless, in all my years working in the IT industry, in many roles ranging from tech support to Strategic Planning Director, I can't think of a single time when linux had any effect on the future of IT.

      It all goes back to basics, too. The Mac showed the benefits of the GUI. And Apple got it right. Microsoft also got their version right, it just feels different and does things differently in many ways too. Those of us who had big unix installations - I had one doing 1M transactions a day which was nothing to sneeze at back then - realized when it came time to decide what operating system sat on the corporate desktops, it wasn't going to be unix despite a pretty spiffy ui of its own. Some things just work better for some things, and the Mac and Windows machines were better for business users because they were easier to use and required less training of the users. And because a ton of software was soon available for them, high quality software.

      None of which is a negative commentary about unix/linux. The inherit transaction processing power of unix is legendary. It runs Oracle (given equal hardware horsepower) better than MVS at the big machine level and better than Windows Server at the small machine level. At the mid-level, unix is king, for good reason. And there it runs Oracle better than other operating systems on the same hardware platforms. Yes, there are exceptions, but overall such is the case.

    21. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by Old+Benjamin · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but for people who's dream is to own a computer, they'll see this is $50 cheaper and think twice before buying windows. Maybe they'll buy Ubuntu.

      --
      "The quickest way to end a war is to lose it" -Orwell
    22. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by Inner_Child · · Score: 1

      I think I speak for everybody here when I say...

      What the fuck are you talking about?

      --
      Today is red jello day - all workers must eat all of their red jello. Failure to comply will result in five demerits.
    23. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by Serpentegena · · Score: 1

      I for one, smell a rat. Or a script.

      --
      Microsoft put the "sucks" in "success".
    24. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I couldn't see the bother of actually having a real install of FreeDOS. I currently have it installed in VMWare for the times when I need to use it. For the old DOS games I have DosBox. Not any other things I need to run that aren't covered by those two uses.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    25. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by rapidweather · · Score: 1
      With Vista, be careful installing applications that are left over from the XP days.
      I know of one, Labview 7.1 that can render a Vista laptop unbootable.
      Fortunately, with Dell, you get a "just as it left the factory" reinstall image, that you can use to put the hard drive back like it was, then it will boot.
      I just know of it, didn't do it myself, but there is supposed to be a keypress combination that will get that done for you, no need to use the "restoration CD", as this is obtained from the hidden restoration partition. Call Dell support if you find that this restoration is required, and you are in business.


      The wonderful thing about Dell's with Ubuntu, is all of the hardware works, so you are good to go. No so if you just pick out a laptop in the store, take it home, and try and install a distro on it yourself. You get some added value with Dell.

      - Rapidweather

    26. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by namekuseijin · · Score: 1

      You forget it comes packed with a great collection of software. Vista comes with what? solitaire and notepad?

      --
      I don't feel like it...
    27. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your system is under warranty, OS doesn't matter. You can run diagnostics off of the hard drive if you leave the diagnostic partition on the system. Or, you can run diagnostics off of the resource CD. If you don't have one, ask that one be sent.

      Either way, if you have a hardware error code, your part will be replaced under warranty.

      I should know, I work there.

    28. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Have you ever even heard of someone [other than a FreeDos developer] actually leaving their FreeDos partition permanently on their machine and using it as anything other than a launching point for installing another OS and/or claiming HW support from Dell?
       
      Yer damn tootin', toots!
       
      I have a few FreeDOS machines running programs 24/7, thank you very much. They do things like control monitoring.
       
      I've heard of tiny "one-chip" type motherboards that can run DOS for this sort of thing, but have never seen one myself live and in-person.
       
      But anything can run DOS, and that's great for a lot of stuff.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    29. Re:"Take hold of their dreams"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you think gave Linux the idea? It was probably people asking him why his non-existent kernel wasn't installed on more desktops.

  2. YAY!! by GregPK · · Score: 0, Troll

    Speaking as someone who once worked for microsoft before leaving for a job with an international office supply retailer. I say YAY!!! Learn from this and make a better OS Micro$oft.

    1. Re:YAY!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sweeping the floors at Microsoft does not put you in a position to make this broad sweeping (pun intended) comment. Maybe we should all start using your OS? Oh wait... you don't have one. Now to prove yourself to the moron hordes as worthy please write back an tell us all how you wrote the entire Vista kernel blindfolded and with one hand before you saw the light and left Microsoft. I'm not anti Linux or pro MS, I'm just anti stupid people and stupid statements.

    2. Re:YAY!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hell do you have to write Vista solo and blindfolded to know how bad it is? He's not the only one to have used Vista and hated the frustrations it causes. If you release a product so bad that even your OEM's would rather still support your previous version, you know you've stuffed up big time. You are the one making the stupid statements here.

    3. Re:YAY!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Writing the Vista kernel would be dead easy.

      1. Grab the Linux kernel
      2. Insert flaws in the code.
      3. Disable all security features.
      4. Insert 5ms delays everywhere you can.
      5. Profit.

      Maybe thsts why Steve "Sweaty" Balmer thinks Linux infringes MS patents.

    4. Re:YAY!! by GregPK · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To be nice, Vista was built with the idea of adding 20 million features to it then trying to make it stable. Which at the moment it really doesn't. Most business customers (Whom BTW account for a vast majority of Microsoft revenues) Want something that that is fast, extremely stable, and consistent. So if it always crashes when you press A 4 and 5 in a sequence it crashes but everything else works perfect. We can work with that. It's stable its easy to predict and easy to fix. Most people in business barely even use those functions in the current windows product. Most companies use a form of exchange server and outlook, word, excel, powerpoint, half a dozen network drives and a dozen or so other 3rd party apps specific to thier field like autocad, Photoshop, testing, etc. All of which slows down when you add in more resource hogging windows functions. The most useful new windows tool I've seen added to date has probably been remote desktop, built in zip functions, run command on the start menu. But even then it has its limits. I'd much rather have a faster way to switch between spreadsheets when I've got 6 open at once, A hotkey wizard for excel and word. A easy hit task manager that functions like the old autoexec.bat file did back in day where all I had to do is just simply take the one I wanted to run doom with and rename it while the old one automatically got named to .bak so I can easily rename it back for other users using other programs. I'd like something that just keeps track of what programs I am or am not using then highlights the ones I'm not using so I can quickly shut them down for more memory. Or even better. A memory saving profile that I can run just the basics when I'm doing work related stuff on the network access to the net. I'm not saying I can make an operating system out of my closet(maybe a computer). But as an end user who looks at a machine for 8-12 hours at a time I know what I want.

    5. Re:YAY!! by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      I used to work at Microsoft, too. All I can say is that having an @exmsft.com instead of an @microsoft.com email address is a wonderful thing :-)

    6. Re:YAY!! by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      Why is it that so many people think Linux and other open source software is somehow at its best when it puts pressure on microsoft to make better products and nothing else? Microsoft will never do anything that will make me want to run their OS. Even if they could, the product would have to be so much like what I'm running already that I'd just stick with what I've got.

      Let's focus on making the big Linux distros release better OSes first. For starters I'd like to see them stop pushing gnome/gtk so exclusively.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    7. Re:YAY!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you on Ritalin or something? Alas, our overmedicated youth.

    8. Re:YAY!! by Redlazer · · Score: 1
      Im wondering if his HTML tags are working or not.

      You know, that would have been much funnier if you only had to press enter to add spaces to a post.

      But, such is the spice of /.

      -Red

      --
      Guns don't kill people, "with glowing hearts" kills people.
    9. Re:YAY!! by 1arkhaine · · Score: 1

      I run Ubuntu

      However. Saying that Microsoft needs to 'make a better OS' because a company has gone from just selling windows to also selling Linux, is hardly, at all, a victory. It's not even really a leveling of the playing field. It's a test.

      It's a pretty sad outlook you have on a battlefield when simply being on it is apparently cause for victory. Don't you need to win, before you can win?

    10. Re:YAY!! by pogson · · Score: 1
      1arkhaine wrote:"It's a pretty sad outlook you have on a battlefield when simply being on it is apparently cause for victory. Don't you need to win, before you can win?"

      M$ is a monopoly. Before you can win the war, you have to win the battle of getting into the market. Dell et al are helping but they are not alone, just the biggest and most recent. see LXer pre-installed Linux database

      --
      A problem is an opportunity http://mrpogson.com
    11. Re:YAY!! by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Calling Microsoft a monopoly is an interesting psychological insight. What I've gathered people really mean by that is "people should be forced to run Linux instead." After all, the choice does exist, in freely available form at that. It's simply not on most people's radar, and zealot want that changed, by fiat if necessary.

      Just my take on it. I'm aware of the court rulings, save me your breathless advocacy.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    12. Re:YAY!! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      What I've gathered people really mean by that is "people should be forced to run Linux instead." Not at all. The only Linux computer I have is a Nokia 770; I run OS X, FreeBSD, OpenBSD and Solaris on all of the other systems I use. The problem is choice. If you buy a new computer, the odds are that it will come with Windows. You can uninstall Windows and install something else, but:
      • The hardware has probably only been tested with Windows, and drivers might not be available for the other OS.
      • Microsoft has still been paid for the copy of Windows.
      Talking specifically about laptops, since they are now over 50% of the new PC market, it is possible to get a non-Windows computer. You can buy a Tadpole machine running Solaris, but it's incredibly expensive. You can buy a Linux machine from HP, if you really try hard. You can buy an OS X machine from Apple, but their range is very limited, so unless you closely match one of their targeted markets you end up with a seriously over- or under-spec'd machine.

      Now you can buy a Dell that both has been tested to work with Linux (i.e. has Linux driver support), and doesn't involve paying Microsoft any money for an OS you're not going to use. Looking at the machine in TFA, it appears that drivers for FreeBSD are also available for all of the listed hardware, so this would make a good machine for someone wanting to run FreeBSD.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    13. Re:YAY!! by Ignignoc · · Score: 1

      That relates to Dell selling laptops with Ubuntu how? Oh btw, I used to work for silicon graphics but I'm so glad I have a @igotfiredfromsilicongraphics.com email address.

  3. Is Ubuntu good? by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

    Is Ubuntu a good distro in this case, given as it's already installed? I mean, from the standpoint of a non-geeky computer user.

    1. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by fonik · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My little brother just installed Ubuntu on his home machine. He's in the 8th grade and his windows installation had to be wiped after the ISP threatened to shut down his internet service because of all the botware. I'd say it's a pretty easy distro.

    2. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by Tribbin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's the distro I install for all my friends.

      When I reinstall Windows for a friend, I put Ubuntu on their computer next to windows and tell them to boot it if windows fails again.

      It takes a couple of months before they really need to fall back on it. And in the meanwhile, at moments when they feel brave, they take a peek in the rabbithole.

      And they confirm; Ubuntu does a great job for a fresh user.

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    3. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, from the standpoint of a non-geeky computer user.

      Don't you mean "from the standpoint of slashdot's resident anti-anything-Ubuntu troll?"

    4. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Is Ubuntu a good distro in this case, given as it's already installed? I mean, from the standpoint of a non-geeky computer user.


      Or could we somehow invoke a distro war using a sneaky Slashdot troll?

    5. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by grcumb · · Score: 5, Informative

      Is Ubuntu a good distro in this case, given as it's already installed? I mean, from the standpoint of a non-geeky computer user.

      I've installed Ubuntu on computers used by well over a thousand new computer users. Common tasks were picked up with as much ease as I've witnessed with first-time Windows users.

      A few things that new users tend to find useful:

      • The system menus are way easier to find your way around. Software is located in the Applications menu, and it's organised by purpose rather than brand name. Links to your hard drive, USB disk and CD ROM are in the Places menu. System-related tasks are in the System menu. You get the idea.
      • USB disks, CDs and other removable media pop open folders when inserted, much as they do in Windows.
      • The default interface is much cleaner and simpler than in Windows. Folders are simpler - which is not to say easier - to navigate. (This is useful for non-geeks, but can prove frustrating for power-users.)
      • Automatic updates are just as easy as - if not easier then - Windows, and all of your software is covered.
      • Upgrades are free. 8^)

      Those are just the first few things that spring to mind. I'm sure others can add to this list.

      Those who are accustomed to Windows will be accustomed to certain conventions, and this will rankle a little bit at first. But once you get used to the fact that, for example, the Start button is on the top of the screen rather than the bottom, you quickly find a lot to like.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    6. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No, because I installed Ubuntu for a friend. The first thing they did was download and attempt to install Windows Messenger (duh). I explained that you can't use "Windows programs" and pointed them to gaim but that wasn't good enough for whatever reason- so we went to the next bit of Windows software they wanted to use but couldn't. So then they tried to go to a dodgy IE only "social" website but couldn't so they weren't happy for long.

      Sure that stuff is crap and probably opening them up to god knows what but that's what they want to use their PCs for. These are the people Windows has locked in and unfortunately it's the majority of PC users at home.

    7. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had a little brother like that first, I would hit him over the head, and then give him a couple of notes/chapters/howtos on MS administration/security just so I won't have to hear another wet-nose punk bragging about being a uber-linux user after performing a one-touch linux installation.

      Back in the good old peek and poke days, PASCAL was a requirement in the 8th grade.

    8. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I would hit him over the head, and then give him a couple of notes/chapters/howtos on MS administration/security

      Aren't you getting a bit mixed up?

      Linux is supposed to be the complicated one. If you need to read all that just to use Windows safely, how do you expect a granny to cope?

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    9. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by Lord_Sintra · · Score: 1

      You should have just got him a copy of Kaspersky/NOD32.

    10. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      It isn't my first choice for a distro, but it seems to be the fasting growing distro for whatever reason.

      I'm a KDE fan and not much of a fan of Gnome personally, so I installed Kubuntu on my wife's box. I was a big fan of SuSe formally, but I won't touch Novell products after the Novell-MS deal.

      My wife was shocked how fast the Kubuntu install was. It bothered me how simple it was, it offered no real advanced options. But to someone new to Linux, it is perhaps perfect. Her laptop isn't particularly fast, but her install took something like 20 minutes, where as XP installs in say 40 on the same laptop.

      If you're new to Linux and considering giving it a try, I recommend looking up a LiveCD, which will allow you to try Linux without formating your computer or installing anything. The other thing you will want to look into right away is what hardware you have, and if you'll have any driver issues with Linux. Linux has an incredibly library of drivers for all kinds of architecture, and plenty of legacy support, but it isn't perfect. My wife's built in wireless card keeps dropping signal in Linux because the driver is shitty.

      Also research how to install proprietary stuff and if you want/need to. Because of licensing, out of the box, Ubuntu/Kubuntu and most distros don't have support for Quicktime, Real Player, MP3's, ATI drivers, NVidia drivers, etc. Often these aren't hard to install, but they can't be bundled with the original installer.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    11. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by TaintedTux · · Score: 2, Informative

      Solution the the above users issues that "Ubuntu/Kubuntu and most distros don't have support for Quicktime, Real Player, MP3's, ATI drivers, NVidia drivers, etc. Often these aren't hard to install, but they can't be bundled with the original installer" Absolutely agreed...however you can install Linux Mint which is Ubuntu with the codecs already installed. Im using GNOME but I know there is a KDE version and I believe an Xfce version as well. Personally Im generally an Arch Linux user which is not newb friendly but can be learned...because Arch was the first distro I ever ran from Linux. Anywho I tried Linux Mint just to see how it worked out because of the ever growing popularity of Ubuntu and wanting to know if the codecs would actually work right after install. I have to say I AM impressed Linux Mint has been quite nice, but Im ready to get back to my Arch box ;-)

    12. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      If there is a KDE flavor of Mint, I'll start recommending that to people. Thanks!

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    13. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you need to reinstall Windows every couple of months, you must not be doing it properly.

    14. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by gnud · · Score: 1

      You assume his friends are using it in a proper matter.

    15. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by MollyB · · Score: 1

      [...] for example, the Start button is on the top of the screen rather than the bottom, [...] Although the top is default for Ubuntu, it can be dragged w/ left mouse button to any border. If an ex-microsoft user simply must have the Start Button (menu, really) at bottom left, s/he can be accommodated.
    16. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by sinthetek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I believe you are mistaken in your conclusion and most of your supporting statements. I installed kubuntu for my 12 year old sister over a year ago (she's 13 now) and have only had to help her with a few minor problems like upgrading to Flash 9 before there was a package ready.

      Many, if not most, Windows applications can be installed and used easily enough with wine. When my ex-girlfriend's Windows crashed and her 'recovery' cds weren't good enough to recover, I gave her a kubuntu cd to try. She had it installed in 30 minutes and the first thing she said was "I can't use this without the official YIM client" (paraphrased, but that's the jist of it). I told her I don't DO proprietary software and wasn't sure how to go about installing it on kde/ubuntu.

      Within 5-10 minutes she had found simple and comprehensive documentation on how to install and setup all of her favorite and necessary Windows applications in ubuntu. Another 30-40 minutes, and she had Word, IE, YIM and several other Windows programs installed with icons and menu entries. I am still not sure how she did it.

      My ex had 0 experience with Linux except what I had told her, which was pretty much just stuff about the opensource philosophy and some features I had mentioned. One of the biggest/best advantages of linux is how easily support and documentation can be found and used.

      As for the other shortcomings you mentioned, they are shortcomings of the sites and those who developed them, not Ubuntu or Linux. Keep in mind which software/OSes are compliant to standards and which aren't. The question was: "Is Ubuntu good?", not "Is Ubuntu good at viewing substandard websites or running proprietary software for another OS out of the box?". Since it provides alternatives to most of the proprietary software you mentioned and clearly marks their function, as well as can be easily modified to run the proprietary counterparts, the answer to this question should be "Yes".

    17. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by Tribbin · · Score: 1

      I had a laptop with windows, for school. Used it one and a half year without reinstall. No virusscanner.

      I lend my laptop to one of those friends for a week because he immediately needed a computer and his windows was f*cked up.

      Guess what, I had to reinstall my windows after that week because it was unfixable.

      So you are right, thanks for backing me up.

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    18. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by thegnu · · Score: 1

      He didn't say he reinstalled it in a few months, he said that Windows got screwed up enough for a non-geek to think, "Screw this," and reboot into Ubuntu. If this doesn't sound reasonable to you, you don't fix computers for a living. Or a hobby.

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    19. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by thegnu · · Score: 1

      If an ex-microsoft user simply must have the Start Button (menu, really) at bottom left, s/he can be accommodated.
      Or you can recommend OpenSuse. :P

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    20. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by JohnBailey · · Score: 1

      And if you think many computer illiterate users can't wreck a carefully set up and tuned Windows install in that space of time, you are obviously not dealing with the people I fix computers for. Even with a firewall and a virus scanner, they still manage to get full of all kinds of junk, so the only fast thing about their new computer is how quickly it gets owned.

      Without any bias. Purely based on the fact that there isn't any of the huge amount of malware that runs on Windows, they would be better off with Ubuntu. But then I'd lose money :-)

      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
    21. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by echucker · · Score: 1

      The key is new computer users. They don't already have a Windows or Mac background, so they don't know any differently. There's nothing to re-learn, since they're starting from scratch.

    22. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 1

      It occurs to me that this is a fantastic way to get people to switch- install the OSes side by side, make sure they no it's there, but don't pressure them into using it. When they get infected with spyware and decide they need a new computer, suggest that thy use ubuntu in the meantime.

      At the very least, they get exposed to something different, and will be happy to be able to still use their computer when windows has died.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    23. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by LocoMan · · Score: 1

      I had the same problems here... my brother was staying with me for a while and he was using my computer for work stuff... and he claimed he didn't do anything but anytime I came back from work I'd see at least one dialer icon on the desktop and had to run adaware and spybot on it...

      As soon as he got money to buy his own computer (with some leftover parts I had around), they suddenly stopped appearing. Now I have two computers, made a second one with leftover pieces after I upgraded the main one, installed ubuntu on it, and anytime there are visits staying at home, I just win+l before heading off to work (so that you can't get in without a password) and tell them they can use the ubuntu one. Not a problem so far.

    24. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by Walkingshark · · Score: 1

      I'm writing this on my dell Inspiron E1505 with Ubuntu, and i have to say that this is exactly the laptop I wanted. I've had a few problems, mostly from learning curve with Linux, but getting the machine from Dell and having support plus all the drivers and everything makes it nice and easy to deal with. I would definitely reccomend one to anyone who needs a laptop for general use.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    25. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by Walkingshark · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I recently bought a Dell laptop with Ubuntu (which I am typing this message on) and it is extremely easy to pick up. One of the cool little things that the post above forgot was that when you're connecting to wireless networks, its a simple dropdown menu that lists all the available networks with bars for their current signal strength. Much easier and more user friendly than windows. Thats true pretty much across the board. The only real problem I've had was when I ran the updates and the basic linux updates screwed up the boot loading. There are instructions on how to fix it but I've been nervous about updating my core ever since that happened. So, not _perfect_, but compared to Windows I'd say it is very, very good.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    26. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by Peaceful_Patriot · · Score: 1

      I've been running Mint on my desktop for a year or so. Yes, there is a KDE version but I haven't tried it yet. I did install the XFCE (Beta) version on my old laptop recently and it runs flawlessly.

      Not having to futz with the multimedia stuff is a huge plus. I recommend Mint to new users because everything works out of the box. It also uses all the Ubuntu repositories and usually fixes can be found in the friendly Ubuntu forums.

      --
      There is nothing so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
    27. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Or saved some money and frustration by switching him to a user-friendly operating system like Ubuntu. I think he made a good choice...

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    28. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by grcumb · · Score: 1

      The key is new computer users. They don't already have a Windows or Mac background, so they don't know any differently. There's nothing to re-learn, since they're starting from scratch.

      Good eye. I did specifically mention them, because I think they're the ones who are most likely to benefit from offers such as Dell's. As far as I can see, there are two groups that will comprise the next wave of desktop Linux users: Office staff and new users. Office staff won't have a choice, but they'll have technical support and training (one hopes). New users, as I've shown, have nothing to fear from Ubuntu, and a lot to like.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    29. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by zeehat · · Score: 1

      It is a good distribution in this case, however, being a non-geeky computer user, you may need to spend $50 on a 1000 page Ubuntu manual. The joys of Linux ^_~

    30. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by Pingmaster · · Score: 1

      conversely, in Windows, the start menu/taskbar can also be moved to any edge of the screen; albeit not as easily.

    31. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by KevinColyer · · Score: 1

      I had an interesting experience recently. I was at a conference in Germany with my company and there was a computer room with about 10 Ubuntu desktops. There was silence in the room as everyone surfed the next with Firefox etc. As far as I know no-one was a linux user, infact in a seminar in their later that I ran I knew no-one was. They got on and Just Worked (tm)!

      What was more interesting to me was that finding the @ symbol was a problem. The keyboards were not set up properly and you needed at bizare key combination to get the @ symbol. Quite why there were not cries of frustration I don't know - lots of people were emailing, They solved their problems two ways. 1. The cut and pasted the @ symbol. 2. one user found the Character Map application to look for the app symbol and then paste it in!

      I was floored. The user in case No.2 had never used Linux before!

      So I think it really is quite easy...

    32. Re:Is Ubuntu good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow.. Foniks little brother could install it, and you couldn't. You have no place to comment on linux.

  4. What this really means by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Many Linux users are willing to buy their own rigs, or have been content to purchase Windows and then either dual-boot or just format and install Linux.

    I don't think this move will equate to widespread acceptance of Linux on the desktop for the home. You're not going to shop Dell's site as a Windows lover with no Linux experience and say, "since Dell is selling Linux, I think I'll give it a try and buy a computer without Windows!"

    It is nice that people will save money, however, there is a potential large impact of this move.

    Several IT departments in all kinds of large corporations struggle with trying to get corporate suits to accept Linux in the workplace. And while large companies like RedHat or Novell will sell support, corporations like familiarity and standardization. If said corporation has a corporate contract with Dell, and Dell is officially standing behind Ubuntu and selling Ubuntu preinstalled, and you can see it as a cost-cutting move to the suits at the same time, then this might help spread the acceptance of Linux in the workplace.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    1. Re:What this really means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Many Linux users are willing to buy their own rigs, or have been content to purchase Windows and then either dual-boot or just format and install Linux."

      Not quite true. I for one have never "been content to purchase Windows" i. bloody e. be forced to pay for an O/S that I rip out by the bollocks.

      Anyone else content?

    2. Re:What this really means by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      If said corporation has a corporate contract with Dell, and Dell is officially standing behind Ubuntu and selling Ubuntu preinstalled, and you can see it as a cost-cutting move to the suits at the same time, then this might help spread the acceptance of Linux in the workplace. But didn't we recently find out that Dell is explicitly not selling Ubuntu machines to business customers, only to home and home office buyers?
      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:What this really means by blitziod · · Score: 1

      ok reasons why hoem users use windows:
      1. everybody else does
      2. it comes with the computer
      3. They get support from dell,HP, Gateway, etc
      4. It runs all the programs they need
      5. It is what they use at work/school
      6. They know how to( well kinda)

      This removes reasons 2 and 3 pretty well. Our company is about to upgrade FROM WINDOWS 98. And I can tell you do to our purchasing guy HATING Vista and trying ubuntu, it will be to a LINUX distro. This is great news!

      --
      The only way to bust a doper--is when you yourself become a smoker!
    4. Re:What this really means by Alcoholic+Synonymous · · Score: 1

      Which will in turn lead to more people becoming familiar with it, and getting used to having tools at their disposal that they don't with Windows (or do at great costs). It also means some people (possibly a lot) will also buy these systems so they can take work home with them and not have to sweat compatibility. It's a big step into reversing the Microsoft monopoly.

    5. Re:What this really means by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      Dell does not provide any actual support for Ubuntu, nor do they sell Ubuntu to businesses. They do, however, sell FreeDos systems to businesses (and not to home users last time I tried). These represent a lot more savings than the home computers as well, since the professional (read, network capable) versions of windows cost even more than the home versions.

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    6. Re:What this really means by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Microsoft doesn't have a monopoly on operating systems, according to the Apple crowd here, because Apple don't have a monopoly on MP3 players (apparently, if lots of people buy Windows because they want to, it's a monopoly. If lots of people buy iPods because they want to, it's "consumer choice at work") - though I suppose here at linux.slashdot.org I can expect less Apple Kool-Aid drinking.

      Back onto the topic though, perhaps Linux would gain more of a following if some people volunteered their efforts (or charged discounted rates) to schools to install and support it. Once people are familiar with it in an educational environment, it would probably be considered as a far more viable option at the purchasing level at your local Walmart or what have you.

      That said, that "taking hold of their dreams" line was really cheesy. Never do that again, Slashdot editors. Ever.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    7. Re:What this really means by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

      Many Linux users are willing to buy their own rigs, or have been content to purchase Windows and then either dual-boot or just format and install Linux.

      That was back when Windows didn't cost $250+. Even Vista Basic is expensive, and may prove worthless in a few years. The high prices are providing fuel for a real move to Linux - as many have predicted.

    8. Re:What this really means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well, it would mean mass adoption of Linux if people could just choose between Linux and windows like any other component and see that it was $50 cheaper. Right now Linux is still buried on the dell website, so people have to know what they want instead of just getting funneled to the Dell Windows PCs. But it is a good first step, I have to give Dell that much. As long as the price parity is kept up and Linux Dell PCs don't end up costing more than Windows Dell PCs like they did before. Where if Linux was an option on the standard configuration screen, then it would save me some effort. It is somewhat annoying that I will have to configure my next Dell PC twice just to make sure I am getting the best deal from Dell, but such is the burden of comparison shopping. And if they do let the Linux PCs get buried in their catalog and don't offer the same deals on them as the Windows PCs, then people will just buy the better deal and install Linux and dell will lose valuable marketing data... so they won't really know their customers again.

      Oh... but as was mentioned before Ubuntu is just for the home market, they won't sell it to corporate customers. They sell either SUSE or Redhat to business customers, which have prices comparable to Windows. But generally corporate IT wants extra expenses, because everything is about insuring that someone outside the company can be called (blamed) when data is lost or productivity is hurt by downtime. "Commercial off the shelf beats just "off the shelf" in corporate decision making circles. And really small businesses will save $50 (times 5, 10 or 20 computers ) by ordering them through the home and small office section and simply have them sent to the owner's house.

      I've seen the ways small, medium and large businesses operate and there is a remarkable difference in the way decisions are made. You value money differently when it isn't going into or coming out of your pocket.

    9. Re:What this really means by HUADPE · · Score: 1

      Dell will however package a Canonical support package with your purchase if you choose to pay them.

      --
      This sig has not been evaluated by the FDA. It is not designed to diagnose, treat, prevent, or cure any disease.
    10. Re:What this really means by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Except the actual cost to you here is $50. If you intend to install Linux, I doubt you're rushing down to Best Buy to pay $250 for Vista. If you buy a new rig today, you get Vista preinstalled, pretty much if you want it or not. The $50 in difference in price isn't huge. For those that are comfortable with Linux alone can take advantage of the discount, and be content that they aren't financially supporting the boys in Redmond, but neither Dell nor you were paying Microsoft $250 for Vista when you're buying a Dell desktop.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    11. Re:What this really means by Enderandrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Dell also said they'd never sell AMD processors, nor never sell Linux on their desktops.

      If big corporations request it, I'm sure Dell will comply.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    12. Re:What this really means by timmarhy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i'd liken it to the first tiny crack in the damn. no water comming out yet, but dell openly selling linux pc's would have been unthinkable even 3 years ago.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    13. Re:What this really means by gujo-odori · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OK, that argument about the iPods looks like it holds a little water at first, but if you stand there for a minute, it turns out to be a sieve (disclosure: I have both a Mac and iPod; the Mac is company-issue and the iPod was a gift.

      What makes it a sieve rather than a bucket is the fact the people are a lot freer to choose their MP3 player than they are to choose their OS. No computer comes with a bundled MP3 player (although I'm sure if Microsoft could find a way to force the major PC vendors to bundle Zunes, it would do it like a shot ). Whichever MP3 player you want, you have to go out and buy it (or someone does, if it's a gift). The MP3 player market was once a pretty level playing field. Then Apple came out with the iPod and the market said that it was good. Very good. It became the top-selling player, and I wouldn't be surprised if over half the players sold are some flavor of iPod. While the iPod line has a level of market dominance similar to that of the Windows product line, it doesn't have the level of lock-in that the Windows and Office product lines have.

      If Apple crashed and burned with the next iPod and it sucked, people would stop buying it pretty quickly and their market share would go in the toilet. If somebody came out with a player that was as far above the iPod as the iPod is above everything else currently on the market, the iPod's market share would go in the toilet. Quickly. In that situation, people upgrading from an old iPod would probably buy the hot new player instead.

      "What about all their existing songs?" you might ask. My entire iTunes library was ripped from my CD collection as high bit-rate MP3, so no problem. I just load it in the new player. If they bought a lot of stuff from the iTunes store, people would have to go to some greater effort and transcode the stuff to MP3 and burn it to a CD, then load it back in, or so. I haven't tried that, but where there's a DRM, there's always a way around it, too.

      Finally, while the iPod is clearly the dominant player in the market, I can go down to Fry's and find a number of competing MP3 players on the shelves. If you walk over to the software section, you're not going to find nearly as much in the way of competing PC operating systems or software for them. If you find any at all, it will take up less than a shelf. Way less. (I'm excluding Mac here because it's also a competing hardware platform, not a PC OS.)

      That said, I would agree that the iPod line could conceivably become a de facto monopoly just because it's so much better than everything else and has such a wide range of third-party accessories, and that the Windows line, while still a de facto monopoly, is much less of one that it used to be. It has real competition now and is starting to lose ground; ou couldn't say that 10 years ago when Microsoft was at the peak of its power.

      I also completely agree with you about that "taking hold of their dreams" thing. I've been a Linux user and supporter for ten years, but that was embarassing.

    14. Re:What this really means by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      Well yes, but it's very expensive for even one year (300 something last I checked.) Of course, I think it probably gets you a better quality of support than the usualy 'gee, I'm sorry, that's not really covered under your tech support contract.'

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    15. Re:What this really means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which in turn maybe will make it more accepted in the homes of those employees sitting in front of a Linux workstation all day? So they might not be frightened when someone proposes to try out Linux on the desktop on their home computer. Just guessing ;)

    16. Re:What this really means by DeviousDevil · · Score: 0

      Except that if you buy Vista with a new PC it will NEVER cost $250+ because you get an OEM copy - which whilst being the exact same software costs 1/3 of the price or less.

    17. Re:What this really means by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      "Well, it would mean mass adoption of Linux if people could just choose between Linux and windows like any other component and see that it was $50 cheaper."

      That would make sense if Linux and Windows were just different brands of a commodity product, but they aren't. If you need to run Windows apps, Linux won't do you any good. Likewise, if you need to run a Linux application, you can't run it on Windows simply by paying an extra $50.

    18. Re:What this really means by Eivind · · Score: 5, Interesting
      But there are several trends coming together. Each individual one may not count for much, but the sum total is still starting to look interesting.
      • The average price of new computers is falling.
      • The price of Windows, both in pure dollars and in requirements is rising sharply.
      • Linux is getting easier and easier for the non-geeks to use.
      • You can get pre-installed Linux from vendors people have heard of. This matters.
      • There's a large amount (though not as large as I'd like) of articles and news-coverage of consumer-hostile "features" in Vista.
      • There is a distinct lack of *advantage* for a consumer moving from XP to Vista, in other words, MS has done next to *nothing* worthwhile for a consumer in the last 5-6 years.
      • Vista has horrible hardware-support. Of the 5 usb-gadgets that my wife uses, 2 failed to work with Vista. For one, an Epson-scanner, the status is: "Drivers will be released in february". Meanwhile, Linux supports more hardware out-of-the-box than any other operating-system ever has. (though not more than XP plus additional drivers)

      None of these are deal-breakers, really. And most people will certainly buy the "default" choice, Vista, without really giving it second thougths. But *some* will start thinking.

      Linux certainly won't displace Windows on the desktop this year, or the next. But it'll continue doing what it's been doing quietly for years already: growing.

    19. Re:What this really means by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      All very good points, but I feel the need to clarify. Linux supports more hardware than anyone because it supports embedded hardware, all kinds of architecture, tons of legacy stuff, etc.

      Windows XP supports most of the hardware on the market today, because vendors write XP drivers first and foremost.

      Despite the mammoth library of Linux drivers, there is some work to be done in improving drivers for new devices. For instance my wife has a Broadcom 43xx series wireless card built into her HP laptop, and even though there is a driver right in the kernel for it, it flat-out wouldn't work. Most people suggested using ndiswrapper to use the Windows drivers. Someone suggested bc43xx-fwcutter firmware, or something like that which got it to work, but she drops connection constantly.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    20. Re:What this really means by supersnail · · Score: 1

      Fine for all you USians but the rest of the world doesnt have the option of unticking the "Windows" box;

      COme on Dell give us either Ubuntu or even better "none" as an option!

      --
      Old COBOL programmers never die. They just code in C.
    21. Re:What this really means by Warbothong · · Score: 1

      "You're not going to shop Dell's site as a Windows lover with no Linux experience and say, "since Dell is selling Linux, I think I'll give it a try and buy a computer without Windows!"" If someone is a Windows lover then this probably won't happen (unless they want to save $50 and wipe over Ubuntu with an illegal Vista disc), but most people I talk to either don't realise that Windows is an option, that is just how computers work and what they look like (I was telling someone just before the Windows Vista launch that they should steer clear of it and carry on using Windows XP. They thought I was on about our University's webmail!), or those that do know what Windows is (probably because they know that a few years ago computers looked different, and the only difference was that "98" changed to "XP") are regularly frustrated with it, because they know that "Computers crash", "Computers get viruses", "Computers get blue screens that delete all of your work" etc. are actually using the word "Computer" instead of "Windows". Yes, other operating systems can crash but in all my years of Linux, whilst some applications have crashed (usually browsers using Adobe's proprietary Flash plugin) the actual system has only ever gone down because of hardware. It even carried on running fine when my hard drives died (although when I clicked "Next" in the picture viewer I got File Not Found, and got command not found when I ran "reboot"). These people are the ones who will buy Dell Ubuntu computers, the people who save $50 and go "Oo! This new computer looks different to the old one!" and the people who previously used Windows because they were caught in the more developers>more applications>more users>more developers loop and knew this, but were putting up with it all until the day a big enough kick up the arse made them switch (and the price is the kick) or were not comfortable messing with their system themselves with no experience/trusting their computer to some company like "Canonical" which they've never heard of and might be spyware/worrying whether their hardware would work in Linux/worrying about support/etc. and a big name like Dell offering Ubuntu and making sure it all works out of the box is the reassurance they need to take the plunge.

    22. Re:What this really means by LaughingCoder · · Score: 1

      although I'm sure if Microsoft could find a way to force the major PC vendors to bundle Zunes, it would do it like a shot
      But, they are a monopoly, so they can force major PC vendors to do whatever they want, right?
      --
      The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
    23. Re:What this really means by westlake · · Score: 1
      The price of Windows, both in pure dollars and in requirements is rising sharply.

      The brand-name HP Pavilion Vista Premium laptop at Walmart.com starts at $780 with a dual-core AMD CPU, 1 GB of RAM, a DVD burner, integrated WiFi, integrated webcam, and DX9 GeForce Go graphics that do not suck.

    24. Re:What this really means by bfields · · Score: 1

      The price of Windows, both in pure dollars and in requirements is rising sharply.

      Microsoft charges whatever they think they can get for it. If the price becomes an issue, they can (and will) give it away; the desktop monopoly is extremely valuable for many other reasons than just the revenue from individual desktop OS licenses.

    25. Re:What this really means by xaosflux · · Score: 1

      Well Dell is close on this one, basically saying that Vista is worth $50.00, still slightly above the mark though!

    26. Re:What this really means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of which is very true, but there are two other points:

      1) Computers aren't significantly increasing in power as far as the average office worker goes. (Office 2007 lists a 500Mhz processor as its system requirement! Even given that this is probably lowballing it, it demonstrates the point.)

      2) There is a also distinct lack of *advantage* for a consumer moving from XP to Linux (or OS X)

      If you have a working XP box, and have your anti-malware setup down, then there's no reason to move to Vista, to Linux or to Mac OS. I personally think Linux+KDE is better than anything MS has ever managed, but the difference isn't enough to justify switching. Even if you've lost your laptop or something, if you can buy a new XP one that's the easiest course.

    27. Re:What this really means by jZnat · · Score: 1

      You do know that Broadcom makes shitty quality, cheap hardware with drivers almost as bad as ATI's, right? I doubt they even know how their own hardware works hence the lack of documentation for it in any other operating system.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    28. Re:What this really means by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Dell does not provide any actual support for Ubuntu, ...

      Some people would add that they don't provide any actual support for Windows, either. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    29. Re:What this really means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on what you want done, and what tech you get. (I actually work Dell tech support, so I have a fairly good idea what I'm talking about here.)

      Dell won't provide support if you want to know how to do something, only if that something won't work, And then whatever it is that's broken has to be something that shipped with your system. (And It wasn't a virus or spyware, those are pay service fees, on the theory that it;s customer caused damage.)

      I do however, get a lot of calls from people whose technicians had them reinstall the OS when a system restore would have been better. Some technicians just suck.

    30. Re:What this really means by Eivind · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True. But this actually adds to Microsofts vulnerability.

      We (as in Linux) support a lot of hardware because we ourselves wrote drivers for it. (well, in some cases the manufacturers did, but when the drivers are open source, they are part of "we".

      Windows xp supports stuff very poorly -- but is rescued by the fact that the manufacturers themselves release binary blobs that work as drivers.

      Which mean we can and will support any and all hardware we support today until the end of time, or more realistically, until nobody cares enough to bother porting the stuff as the kernel changes.

      So, Windows-users are at the mercy of manufacturers, which have little incentive for quickly developing high-quality drivers for a piece of hardware they probably neither sell nor produce anymore. -- *they* would much prefer people bougth a *new* scanner/digicam/webcamera/younameit. So, Epson is taking its good time, releasing drivers at *all* 15 months after Vista is released, assuming the announced schedule holds, which I wouldn't assume, really. And that's for a product they used to produce up until 6 months ago. For somewhat older products they don't bother at all.

      Microsoft could pick up the slack, start developing and maintaining drivers themselves, just like we do. But it'd cost them. And it ain't done overnigth.

      A win for Linux. The new Dell with Ubuntu on it would support all of my wifes gadgets out-of-the-box, Vista supports half of them out-of-the-box, and drivers for the remaining 2 are promised in 8 months. Which ain't very satisfactory. Nor is she inclined to toss away a scanner and digital camera that she is perfectly happy with. None of them are old either, aproximately 1 year.

    31. Re:What this really means by Eivind · · Score: 1

      True. But it'd cost them. If you subtract OS-sales from their bottom-line last year, they'd have been in the red. So to be able to do it they would need to cut costs. They could take it from the war-chest offcourse, but no company wants to operate in the red indefinitely.

      Furthermore, it's not just the Desktop. They have 2 significant income-centres. One is dominating the desktop, the other is office. Office is similarily hard pressed as Vista, perhaps even more. Dropping Windows atleast has the drawback that most of your programs and games won't work. Dropping Office in favour of an open alternative has neither of those drawbacks.

      And MS cannot set the price for Office and Windows to $0. Not the MS we know today anyway. Not with the cost-structure they have presently, or any similar to it. If they did that, they'd burn trough their war-chest at a rate that'd make even that chest (and it's huge!) look short-lived.

    32. Re:What this really means by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Very true. Those drivers also don't just magically disappear.

      Microsoft doesn't keep a repository of all Windows drivers (though I hear all signed Vista drivers will be available via update.microsoft.com eventually)

      I have a nifty flightstick with motion sensing that I can move in the air (like a Wii, but there is no bar to sense it, it is all internal). Too bad the company that made it went under and there are no drivers for it online. But with Linux, once a driver goes in the kernel source, it pretty much stays there, so you don't have to hunt it down.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  5. They'll probably choose Ubuntu because.. by katterjohn · · Score: 4, Funny

    .. they're too confused about all the different editions of Vista ;)

    1. Re:They'll probably choose Ubuntu because.. by Tribbin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hope you see the irony of your comment?

      With the grand choice you have in Ubuntu alone, the apps, and other distro's.

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    2. Re:They'll probably choose Ubuntu because.. by glwtta · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Let's see... do I need Premium or Ultimate? Oooh! Gutsy Gibbon!!!"

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    3. Re:They'll probably choose Ubuntu because.. by fonik · · Score: 5, Insightful

      At least with Ubuntu the customers can switch around for free. With windows you have to pay more if you find your license doesn't cover a feature you need, like multilingual support or remote desktop.

    4. Re:They'll probably choose Ubuntu because.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, as opposed to all the different editions of linux distros?

    5. Re:They'll probably choose Ubuntu because.. by dwater · · Score: 1

      What other linux distros are Dell selling?

      --
      Max.
    6. Re:They'll probably choose Ubuntu because.. by kypper · · Score: 1

      Except the AIDS version.

      People are pretty much solid on that one.

    7. Re:They'll probably choose Ubuntu because.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RedHat.

    8. Re:They'll probably choose Ubuntu because.. by toleraen · · Score: 1

      All two of them that Dell is selling (to the home user)? If they can't figure out the difference between the two versions of Vista, they don't have a chance in hell at figuring out how to use Ubuntu.

    9. Re:They'll probably choose Ubuntu because.. by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Red Hat and SuSE, at least on the server side.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    10. Re:They'll probably choose Ubuntu because.. by Aeron65432 · · Score: 1

      Mod parent insightful more than funny. Although I love the names and the creativity, "Vista Premium" sounds a hell of a lot better than "Feisty Fawn" when I'm seriously encouraging its' use to another person. I just generally go with "Ubuntu 7.04," but most people think that means version 7, revision 4. (April-2007, if you didn't know)

    11. Re:They'll probably choose Ubuntu because.. by dwater · · Score: 1

      This conversation is not about the server side.

      For the Dell desktop, Ubuntu is the only linux distro, so there's only once choice. One option isn't confusing, I think.

      Also, Ubuntu isn't available for the servers (right?), so that's only a choice of two (RedHat/SuSe).

      Even if it were a choice of Ubuntu, RedHat and SuSe, that is still only 3.

      Also, since I was replying to :

      > What, as opposed to all the different editions of linux distros?

      I think 1, 2, or 3 doesn't fit "all the different editions of linux distros"...

      On the other hand, I admit to being ignorant of "all the different editions of MS Windows Vista". How many are there?

      --
      Max.
    12. Re:They'll probably choose Ubuntu because.. by wild_berry · · Score: 1

      Yes, but Desktop, Server, Alternate, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, and Edubuntu editions might mar the simplicity of the thing...

    13. Re:They'll probably choose Ubuntu because.. by jZnat · · Score: 1

      "Ubuntu Feisty Fawn" is a developer internal name (similar to how Vista used to be called "Longhorn", for instance); the proper release name is "Ubuntu 7.04", and should be referred to as that in any situation not regarding the development of it (or by fans of goofy names). Besides, people only think Microsoft's software names aren't goofy because they've been around for a decade or two. What the hell does a window have to do with an operating system? And what the fuck is an "excel" (yes, the noun, not the verb which has actual meaning)? Why is "Internet Explorer" only limited to the World Wide Web and not the whole internet? Why do I go to the Start menu to shutdown? Why do I "sign in" to my system when everyone else says "log in"? etc.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    14. Re:They'll probably choose Ubuntu because.. by JohnBailey · · Score: 1

      All two of them that Dell is selling (to the home user)? If they can't figure out the difference between the two versions of Vista, they don't have a chance in hell at figuring out how to use Ubuntu. Ahh.. so offering twice as many windows options as the single Linux option for home users is an advantage? Which is academic anyway, as most of the people who are going to buy the Dell computers are already Linux users or already know a bit about it and are more comfortable buying from a big name retailer than putting it together themselves.

      And what exactly is so hard about using Ubuntu? From a geek point of view, its incredibly easy without reading a single line of instruction. For a complete noob, general operation is no different to Windows, and I would assume one of the reasons they chose Ubuntu was that it is exceptionally to set up with things like codecs and video card drivers. The wireless networking will already be auto detected, so another common problem out the window.
      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
    15. Re:They'll probably choose Ubuntu because.. by green1 · · Score: 1

      >> "Ubuntu 7.04," but most people think that means version 7, revision 4. (April-2007, if you didn't know)
      but it is mostly irrelevant, as long as the next version has a higher number (which it will unless they start time travelling) then it doesn't matter what it MEANS, people will still know that a higher number means a more recent version. it's not like windows 95 or 98 meant version 95 or version 98, and at least with a number you can tell what is newer than what. Without any windows knowledge how is one supposed to know which is newer, 3.11, 95, NT4, 2000, ME, XP, Vista? they're all meaningless. at least with something like Ubuntu 7.04 it's obvious what version is newer or older even if you don't have a clue what the number actually means.

    16. Re:They'll probably choose Ubuntu because.. by toleraen · · Score: 1

      Errr, how is it free to switch around? You get Ubuntu for $50 less. If they want to "switch around" back to windows, then they'll have to pony up $200 for a license, instead of the $50 they were going to spend.

    17. Re:They'll probably choose Ubuntu because.. by Trogre · · Score: 1

      I'm still miffed they skipped Flatulent Ferret.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  6. news for nerds, stuff that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lame.

    1. Re:news for nerds, stuff that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aww, are you stuck reading real news because Digg is down again?

  7. sorry, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sorry, but i gotta say "...who need a little extra push to take hold of their dreams and run Linux." is the single-most pathetic thing i've read on the entire internet, ever.

    1. Re:sorry, but... by martin_henry · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      the single-most pathetic thing i've read on the entire internet, ever.

      i dunno....i read somewhere that Paris Hilton is newsworthy....

      --
      www.purevolume.com/martyd
    2. Re:sorry, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new to the internet. Welcome.

    3. Re:sorry, but... by anilg · · Score: 1



      I smell a meme in the making

      " needs a little extra push for to take hold of their dreams"

      --
      http://dilemma.gulecha.org - My philospohical short film.
  8. Nice gesture by Tribbin · · Score: 1

    I believe it has great symbolic value.

    And I don't believe anybody would consider buying it to save money.

    It would be even better if DELL would use another 50 dollar per sale for developers of the software of DELL's choice. That would give buyers a nice cosy Ubuntu feeling and it would be great marketing.

    --
    If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    1. Re:Nice gesture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I absolutely am considering buying this to save money. I'm a freaking poor EE grad student and I use Linux to run all my simulations. Do I look like I have $50 to spare?

    2. Re:Nice gesture by blitziod · · Score: 1

      ok not an incentive to run linux, just a way to NOT purchase windows vista with a new PC from Dell. That alone is great for folks like us who do not want that crap on our PC's and resent having to pay for it!

      --
      The only way to bust a doper--is when you yourself become a smoker!
    3. Re:Nice gesture by fonik · · Score: 4, Informative

      I hate to say this because I'm a huge *buntu fanboy. I recently bought a Dell 1501 with much better specs than the 1505n for $300 less off of dell business via slickdeals.net. The buttons on the front of the laptop are the only major difference.

      The Ubuntu ones may be cheaper, but the Dell Business ones go on sale very often and the hardware is just as linux friendly.

    4. Re:Nice gesture by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it's nice that Linux users save $50, but I think this will have zero effect on Windows users. People aren't going to switch because it's cheaper; rather, they're more likely to say, "You get what you pay for," and see the $50 extra as a vote for Windows' quality.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    5. Re:Nice gesture by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      Is there a Linux certified laptop that's cheaper than the Dell?

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    6. Re:Nice gesture by bberens · · Score: 1

      The SIAA just bumped their maximum reward for reporting pirated software to $1 million. This action further raises the cost of doing business because it's really quite difficult to keep track of proof for all the licenses for everything in a huge corporation and businesses will have to be extra careful because one disgruntled employee who wants to make off with a million bucks could really hurt them. This may encourage the use of free software and likewise encourage business users to demand free software support on their machines. To get back on topic... if I'm buying my one laptop it's not so big, but if I'm buying 1500 laptops this year then $50/pop is substantial, plus I don't have to concern myself with keeping track of the licenses which is an additional savings.

      --
      Check out my lame java blog at www.javachopshop.com
    7. Re:Nice gesture by bberens · · Score: 1

      By SIAA I meant SIIA or Software & Information Industry Association

      --
      Check out my lame java blog at www.javachopshop.com
    8. Re:Nice gesture by Warbothong · · Score: 1
      "the hardware is just as linux friendly."

      Can you get my 3D graphics card to do 3D for me please? And stop the kernel panics from happening when power management is enabled? And make my wireless card run faster then 11Mb/s? And make all of these "Hibernate" "Standby" and things work which I've heard a lot about but just seem to mean "Make my screen go black and force me to hard-reset"?

      I am not whinging about Ubuntu, I love Ubuntu, but I have a 1501 and your statement is wrong.

      PS: This is not a joke. Please. I want 3D!

  9. $50? by Mystery00 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think that is a big enough incentive, people that have been brainwashed by M$'s propaganda about how great Vista is aren't going to suddenly turn and say "ZoMG! This OS is $50 cheaper! Forget Vista!"

    A $50 difference will do nothing in terms of persuasion for the common man, the people that buy Ubuntu pre-installed are only the ones that have done the research and know at least a bit about what they've doing, and what they want, the rest know Windows, and M$'s advertising.

    What Ubuntu needs from Dell, isn't a $50 price difference, but some available INFORMATION, look here: www.dell.com/

    I don't know about you, but all I see are Vista loaded machines, I didn't check every page, but nobody is going to buy an Ubuntu loaded machine if it's buried somewhere at the back of the site, or the store.

    --
    "we've got trenchcoats and bad attitudes" - John Constantine, HellBlazer
    1. Re:$50? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't think that is a big enough incentive, people that have been brainwashed by M$'s propaganda about how great Vista is aren't going to suddenly turn and say "ZoMG! This OS is $50 cheaper! And not shit! Forget Vista!"

      There. Fixed it for you.

    2. Re:$50? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft pays Dell to make Vista visible. See, MS (or M$, whatever makes you feel smart) has something called an *advertising budget*, and it's vital to selling products in the modern world.

      When Ubuntu starts paying money to have their name put out there, maybe then Dell will start showing Linux machines on the front page. Dell is a business. They are not interested in pushing open sourse, bringing down MS, or even *delivering the best product to the customer*. They're interested in making money, plain and simple.

    3. Re:$50? by fonik · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Heh, yeah.

      I like the part of the www.dell.com/open site where it asks you if you are there by mistake and suggests you go back to looking at Windows machines.

      The main thing to note is that when you choose open source you don't get a Windows® operating system. If you're here by mistake and you are looking for a Dell PC with Windows, please use the following link.

      Shop Dell PCs with Windows
      They even put the link to their Windows machines BEFORE the link to the Ubuntu machines. If you were selling cars and someone showed interest in an import, would you ask, "Are you SURE you want to buy one of THOSE?" Their machines work great, but the website is serious WTF material.
    4. Re:$50? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that is a big enough incentive, people that have been brainwashed by M$'s propaganda

        Has ANYONE actually been brainwashed by M$'s* propaganda? I vaguely remember teh first time I saw that "Wow!" commercial. They said "Wow!" and I said "Huh?" Then a minute later I said "Meh."

        * (I was going to use "MS", but then I remembered all those obnoxious gits who get pissed off when people use a dollar sign instead of an S. So, I changed it. This letter M and dollar sign is for all of you out there, you humorless pricks, morons who post that fucking "advocacy" copy-pasta shit every time twitter posts, and other various and sundry annoying twats with sticks up your asses. M$, M$, M$!)

    5. Re:$50? by weeb0 · · Score: 1

      The money saving is not the point to gain new user to linux. But, now people like me, who don't want to pay the M$ tax when buying a laptop will have a new option.

      It's good for Dell (they will get new customer) and it's good too for average linux user who want's a linux laptop.

      To gain some new non-geek linux user, we'll have to buy some tv ads ... And a big marketing group... I don't think there is another way to do that!

    6. Re:$50? by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Hey! I have never used copy-paste to reply to twitter's bullshit! I always spend at least two minutes thinking of a valid, well-documented reason that he's talking out his arse!

      Well, actually I spend 22 seconds thinking of one, because it's just that easy, and then spend the next 1 minute and 38 seconds drinking coffee, generally slacking off, and chewing food.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    7. Re:$50? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! I have never used copy-paste to reply to twitter's bullshit!

        Well, I wasn't talking about you. It's some other guy (or guys) who clip this stupid advocacy article (including the bit about how no-one should ever use "M$". Fucking concern troll bullshit!) and post it every time the guy posts. (Even when he posts something sensible, which I'll admit isn't very often. Heh.)

    8. Re:$50? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, but a Linux user like me that would either not have bought a Dell AT ALL, or that would have gone for the equivalently priced Windows bundle, now has a good reason to go buy the Dell WITHOUT Windows. Yes, only Linux on it.

      While I don't need a new PC right now, applaud Dell for this. If I needed a new PC, I'd seriously consider Dell just for this fact alone. For daring break up the "monopoly".

    9. Re:$50? by mumblestheclown · · Score: 1

      So, why exactly should dell care whether you buy ubuntu or vista? presumably it makes at least $1 on vista, so, really.. i mean really. why the hell should dell push ubuntu to people who would not have asked about it anyway? dell is not part of your evangelizing cult. they are a business. they will happily supply people who want linux with the opeating system if that keeps them from buying PCs elsewhere, but they aren't going to bend over backwards about this in order to reduce their own revenue from others who likely would have bought vista.

    10. Re:$50? by Paradigm_Complex · · Score: 1

      I'm content to see a gap in the Windows Tax. True, this probably is not sufficient to change Joe Average's purchase, but it'd definitely open options for those of us who don't have the time to build our own machine (or have had a horrible history doing so and want to play it safe with a warantee >.> )and refuse to pay the Windows Tax. My mother needs a new machine - for the first time I'm serious considering not building it myself. This is definitely making a difference, just not to the largest slice on the pie chart.

      --
      "A witty saying proves nothing." - Voltaire
    11. Re:$50? by howlingmadhowie · · Score: 1

      i remember a story a friend of mine once told me. at that stage he was working in some supermarket in the north of england. the supermarket stocked at least 2 brands of pasta sauce, one of which was the brand which advertised nationally and another one of which was the shop's own brand. the shop's own brand was cheaper than the one which was advertised nationally. it sold badly, most customers choosing the brand which was advertised nationally, and piles of it grew in the store room gathering dust. at this point, a memo came through from headquarters requesting that the price of the shop's own brand be increased to more than the price of the band which was advertised nationally. the result was that most customers bought the shop's own brand. this somewhat reminds me of my own mother who while she was a housewife would shop around for the highest price on something she would buy so she could boast to her acquaintances about how rich she was.

    12. Re:$50? by Myrcutio · · Score: 1

      people that have been brainwashed by M$'s propaganda about how great Vista is Well, we can call both of them and explain the pro's and cons of Ubuntu. As for everyone else who sees Vista for the *explitive deleted* that it is, $50 is a nice little cookie for choosing something different. Really, who doesn't like cookies?
    13. Re:$50? by tuxic · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't suggest there's a conspiracy theory behind it, just stupid-as-hell users who they have experience with in the past. Perhaps they don't want to see a headline on cnn.com where it says "computer user bought a Dell and there was no Windows on it - sues Dell for having a broken PC".

      Or, a simple way to not get a billion unnecessary support calls, I don't know. But it's probably why they in the first place do not list these Linux computers on the front page with a huge splash saying "NEW! Dell starts offering Ubuntu, a Desktop-friendly Linux! Buy one today! Look at the revolutionary OS that's gotten easier to use!", etc, etc. The usual marketing slogans anyway :)

      However, maybe it will only be a year from now we'll see them offering Ubuntu 8.04 OEM as a normal option listed among most their computer choices. Or maybe not. But I think there will either be more to come, or it will just stay there as a silent option, a long-term experiment.

      --
      "People are stupid. Persons are smart" -- Agent K, MiB.
    14. Re:$50? by Trelane · · Score: 1

      It's not much of an experiment if they hide the choice from the users.

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    15. Re:$50? by tknd · · Score: 1

      Don't assume that only people that know something about linux are hitting the ubuntu pages. There are a lot of people that end up looking at the machines anyway but don't know a thing about ubuntu. This is natural just as anyone in a store will happen to walk by some gadget they don't understand and will wonder if they need one of those gadgets because someone else is there fiddling with it.

      And dell is right to suggest windows to users that have no clue what they're doing. If a linux geek is willing to help a friend out with a few linux issues, great. But people who happen to buy ubuntu might be lost in the dark when something goes wrong or something doesn't go quite right. Most people's reactions when they have a problem isn't "read the fine manual," it's more like call up the manufacturer and talk to a human being.

    16. Re:$50? by wall0159 · · Score: 1

      In their defence, they're most likely trying to protect their ass from a customer that doesn't understand the difference between a PC and Microsoft Windows.

      To clarify, I think more than 50% of people buying a new computer wouldn't even notice if it shipped with Ubuntu instead of Windows - that is, until they went to install some new software (no evidence, just opinion ;-).

    17. Re:$50? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Well, but you can also buy redhat enterprise from dell, which costs considerably more.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    18. Re:$50? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Bringing down MS would actually suit their business goals of making money tho...
      As it stands, Dell are dependant upon MS... It's not a good position for your business to be in, when a single third party could fuck your business up overnight. If MS decided to charge Dell full retail price for copies of windows, they would no longer be able to compete with all the other manufacturers out there, and would rapidly lose marketshare and go probably bankrupt. If i was in charge of such a business, i would be doing everything i could to get out of such a dangerous position.
      On the other hand, there is noone who can screw over dell's linux systems. Regardless of what Ubuntu does, Dell can still obtain it for free under the terms of the GPL, putting them in the same boat as everyone else. Plus, there are many other linux distributions they could move to if they have a disagreement with Ubuntu.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    19. Re:$50? by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Hey! A one dollar difference is enough! that's the difference between $999 and $1000. If it works for washing machines why can't it for computers ?

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    20. Re:$50? by taragui · · Score: 1

      a memo came through from headquarters requesting that the price of the shop's own brand be increased to more than the price of the band which was advertised nationally. the result was that most customers bought the shop's own brand

      I'd think it rather unlikely in the case of pasta sauce, but this phenomenon is called Veblen effect in economics. Simply put, goods provide utility both from their intrinsic qualities, and from the social distinction their consumption provides. If a higher price tag leads consumers to think they will get higher social standing from their purchase, they will actually consume more as the price increases.

      Please note that any reference or similarity to persons, places or activities involved in Apple marketing are purely coincidential and unintentional :)

      --
      Jesus saves. Real gods just upload their important stuff on ftp, and let the rest of the deities mirror it
    21. Re:$50? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At first thought, I'd agree, but not after looking at it from their perspective. You assume this comment is to steer people away from Linux, but if you consider Dell's customer base, I think you'll realize that most of their customers do want Windows and are too uneducated in this regard to realize what a machine with Ubuntu is.

      By putting up this warning, they're just covering their bases to prevent complaint calls about computers that won't run various Windows-only programs. Doing otherwise could cost them a great deal of money.

    22. Re:$50? by vtcodger · · Score: 1
      ***I don't think that is a big enough incentive, people that have been brainwashed by M$'s propaganda about how great Vista is aren't going to suddenly turn and say "ZoMG! This OS is $50 cheaper! Forget Vista!"***

      Well ... really, no. Joe and Gini Sixpack really don't have much idea what Vista is. I don't know what the hell Microsoft did with that 90 million that was supposed to launch Vista, but if they spent it, it seems to have vanished down some sort of rathole. And in my experience the few non-geek users who know the difference between XP and Vista more often than not are not Microsoft fans.

      There are two problems. The first is that the semi-knowledgable sales folks in the big box stores tend to push Vista ... hard ... almost as hard as they push extended warranties.

      The second problem is that many people really do need Windows software. My wife would probably never notice whether Firefox was running under Windows or a Unix of some sort. And I don't think that switching her from Eudora to something else would be a big problem. For all I know Eudora has a Linux version or runs under WINE. As long as her desktop icons are there and Freecell works (it runs fine under WINE btw) Linux would be fine.

      The problem is the proprietary support software for her $7000 sewing machine. There is no Linux support. It barely runs under Windows. I suspect the chances of it running under WINE are somewhere between slim and none.. And even if it did run, I'd surely end up spending even more time debugging and tweaking than I do removing malware. So, that machine is staying on Windows -- probably forever. Maybe someday, I'll look at running the support crud in a VM, but not this year ... or next.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    23. Re:$50? by BlueParrot · · Score: 1

      I think it is fairly sensible to be honest. The last thing we want is a bunch of casual computer users getting a bad impression of Linux because they feel ripped of when they were expecting a Windows license. Lets face it, 99% of people who wants to buy a Linux system from Dell will just ignore the warning anyway, but this way they avoid a number of idiots buying an Ubuntu system by accident. I don't think that is a bad thing.

    24. Re:$50? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Their machines work great, but the website is serious WTF material.

      No, their lowest denominator of customers is WTF material. How many do you think randomly click around until they find something "oooh, that's cheap" and buy it? Then find out they've bought something which doesn't "work" with basicl things like plugging in a USB gadget and the accompanying CD. Yes, there are normally Linux apps that work as well or better, but if you're not ready for it... "What do you mean I can't use the photo software that came wtih my digicam" or "What do you mean $GAME won't run on this machine?" etc.

      Dell.com is not a place limited to computer professionals. They need to be able to tell the people "Hey, you were whacked five times over the head with the fact that this is not a Windows machine, didn't you see any of those warnings?"

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  10. Ubuntu preinstalled + Dell laptop = new customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although I've always installed my own Linux distros on everything and it's totally second-nature to me, it still takes time to get everything working properly.

    Receiving a fully-working Linux system out of the box and not needing to pay the MS tax would be valuable, and if Dell extends their offer to laptops, I'll certainly be a new customer.

  11. I lose $50 in the wash every year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The benefits of using Linux (or FreeBSD, my OSoC) is lost on the masses, who want what's easiest; whatever allows them not to think. Or what's "cool". Mac OS X is no less clunky than than any OS I've ever used but it's percieved as being "cool", so it's better. I've had users with PHDs who wanted to remain so ignorant of the OS they used every day you might as well have been wiping their arse for them. Most people are sheep, and by choice. My hat is off to the folks at Ubuntu and it's spin-offs for trying to get through to those people; it must be like Sisyphus, rolling his init scripts up that hill.

  12. Doesn't matter. by Meor · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd pay 50$ dollars to never read a man-page or hear "RTFM" by a Linux zealot again.

    1. Re:Doesn't matter. by wall0159 · · Score: 1

      I realise you're kidding, and it's funny, but...

      I've asked a _lot_ of questions in Linux forums over the last 7 years, and I can only remember one rude person (and that's when I entered into a debate about the merits of GPL vs BSD licenses ;-). Most people go out of their way to help. YMMV...

    2. Re:Doesn't matter. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      I'd pay 50$ dollars to never read a man-page

      Yeah, I don't like gay porn either.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    3. Re:Doesn't matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Send me $50 and I promise I'll never tell you to RTFM again. I have no solution to your man-pages issues.

  13. but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    what if I wanted OS X on my Dell??

    1. Re:but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  14. The difference in value is more than $50 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The difference in value of a system running Ubuntu and a system running Vista is far more than $50 to most people. To the majority, it's worth more than $50 to stay with something comfortable (Windows). For others, it's worth more than $50 to have a system that's free (as in freedom AND beer).

    The $50 is only meaningful because it's based on 1) Dell's cost and 2) Dell's perception of how much of a difference in price it takes to get attention in the marketplace. Ultimately Dell doesn't care which one you buy, but if they get your attention you may buy Dell instead of HP or someone else.

  15. What the hell? by Spudtrooper · · Score: 1

    Did I fall through a wormhole and end up in May again?

  16. Target market by idesofmarch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is this the PC for Vista/XP pirates? I mean, why pay an extra $50 when you don't have to?

    1. Re:Target market by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

      That's why it needs to be illegal to purchase a PC without paying for Vista. It's the only way to make the pirates pay.

  17. My reality just got shaken by edwardpickman · · Score: 1

    You mean open source isn't more expensive? Could Microsoft be wrong? Next thing you'll be telling me is that Vista isn't the greatest OS in history.

  18. Not bad by no-body · · Score: 2, Interesting
    at all...

    Go to dell.com, type in Linux as search, click on suggested link (ignore the recommended M$ stuff)
    - select Ubuntu,
    "XPS 410 N"
    click through "adding features",
    leave everything as default and...:

    "1Yr In-Home Service, Parts + Labor - Next Business Day"

    I like it!

  19. Re:Is Ubuntu good? Maybe. by mpapet · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In Ubuntu's case, the GUI looks familiar and there isn't any need whatsoever for a firewall and anti-virus software, even though that's available too. If your needs are like most, you won't miss a thing.

    There are two steep learning curves:

    1. Putting the finishing touches on most of the applications included. An example is the kmail spam filter bogofilter. Sure, there's a gui to sort of get it going, but you'll discover it doesn't really work until you set up the wordlist.db and a cron job to feed the wordlist. None of which is obvious.

    2. Troubleshooting. It's all different underneath and it takes some time to figure it out. But it's logical. Once you get the hang of it, it's much easier to use.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  20. "take hold of their dreams and run Linux"? by bheer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow, rhinokitty can sure lay on the purple prose. What's next, Linux will help me leverage my key skills and maximize my full potential, making my chakras spin in unison to bring me closer to a fully actualized human being?

    1. Re:"take hold of their dreams and run Linux"? by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      What's next, Linux will help me leverage my key skills and maximize my full potential, making my chakras spin in unison to bring me closer to a fully actualized human being?

      No, that's ninja training with the Perverted Hermit. You'll be spending a lot of time with water balloons.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:"take hold of their dreams and run Linux"? by oztiks · · Score: 1

      No you have it all wrong ...

      You meditate in the lotus position and chant "UUUUUBUUUNNNNTTUUU" with every exhaling breath ...

      Do this for 5 mins a every day and soon enough you'll achieve enlightenment ...

  21. I hate Vista but for $50.... by syousef · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...if I'm spending thousands on a new laptop, I'll still take the OS if it's optional. I can pick up Ubuntu for nothing later on. Vista would cost me hundreds.

    This isn't a push in the right direction, it's a slap in the face!

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:I hate Vista but for $50.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Except the hardware won't work. Most Dell other than their Linux machines use ATI and Broadcom, which are a HORRIBLE combination.

    2. Re:I hate Vista but for $50.... by Trelane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mod parent up! (Lack of) hardware support due to PCs being "Designed for Windows" is the reason Linux has its reputation for being hard to install.

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    3. Re:I hate Vista but for $50.... by syousef · · Score: 1

      Nice troll but you can get Vista or Ubuntu on the same hardware. Providing the drivers are available for download it's not hard. I just bought an Inspiron 9400 with Vista Ultimate. It arrived Monday. I've got it dual booting XP with all hardware recognised as of this morning. There was a little messing with boot loaders and recovery discs and I did have to download the drivers, but since the machine was no longer offered with XP and I had a spare legit license I risked having trouble installing (after googling the problems others had) when they ran their $1000 off end of financial year thing. So far so good.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    4. Re:I hate Vista but for $50.... by MojoStan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Subject: I hate Vista but for $50....

      ...if I'm spending thousands on a new laptop, I'll still take the OS if it's optional. I can pick up Ubuntu for nothing later on. Vista would cost me hundreds.

      Perhaps, but I don't think it's "hundreds." According to the story's scoop, that $50 only gets you Vista Home Basic. Also, it's an OEM version, which means you cannot transfer the license to another computer (like you can with retail versions). An OEM version of Vista Home basic costs $90 to $95 at everybody's favorite egg store.

      Also, I think there's significant value in a preinstalled Linux distro that's been tested and confirmed to work with all of the hardware (especially notebooks). Even for supposedly user-friendly distros like Ubuntu, I've read many anecdotes about minor driver problems and manually editing config files. Sure, you can have the same problems with Windows. However, every PC hardware vendor writes Windows drivers first. Linux drivers are almost always secondary if they are written at all. We can at least be somewhat assured that Dell chose Linux-friendly hardware and tested the drivers on these Ubuntu PCs.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    5. Re:I hate Vista but for $50.... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      But what about us who wants neither Windows or Ubuntu? Who wants to install our own OS, and not pay extra to support those who need to call the company with questions?
      I don't want to pay for the support for an OS I won't use (and if it's an OS I use, I'd rather get my support from specialists at full price than outsourced people reading from a script).

      Is it too much to ask to be able to buy a PC without any OS, and instead get specs that haven't been dumbed down for the masses?

      Regards,
      --
      *Art

    6. Re:I hate Vista but for $50.... by chameleon_skin · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that the they aren't basing this off of your retail price for Vista; the $50 probably represents their wholesale price for the OS. They're simply passing the difference on to you.

    7. Re:I hate Vista but for $50.... by fan+of+lem · · Score: 1

      Bear in mind though that that $50 cheap Vista comes with bloatware.

    8. Re:I hate Vista but for $50.... by esmrg · · Score: 1

      Hello! They are talking about Home Basic Edition, which you would never buy anyway.

    9. Re:I hate Vista but for $50.... by Sancho · · Score: 1

      You can get FreeDOS, which is almost as good as not getting any OS. I mean, there's pretty much nothing you can do with it, anyway.

    10. Re:I hate Vista but for $50.... by Hucko · · Score: 1

      Is it too much to ask to be able to buy a PC without any OS, and instead get specks that haven't been dumbed down for the masses?
      Isn't that the definition of a Dell machine? Dumbed down for convenience sake? I agree with the option to not pay for unnecessary 'support' though. I'm sick of pretending to be stupid to lead the people on the end of the line to the conclusion I have already discovered.
      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    11. Re:I hate Vista but for $50.... by catxk · · Score: 1

      I wanted (want) Ubuntu for my laptop, but it didn't work with wifi etc., so I gave up. And - not trying to be an ass - it wasn't because Linux had its reputation for being hard to install, it was because it Linux is hard to install. And yes, I know the reason behind it, but the fact remains the same and it's sad that hardware manufcaturers can't straighten up and make their hardware easily workable under Linux, blablabla.

      --
      Don't be crazy anymore!
    12. Re:I hate Vista but for $50.... by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      Actually, $50 may be realistic for Dell. While we don't know the details of Dell's contract with Microsoft, it is quite possible that they pay only $30 - $40 per copy they bundle with their PCs.
      If so, they can afford to sell it for $50. If you pay hundreds when buying Vista separately, it is a matter of Microsoft's pricing policy. No slap in the face from Dell.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    13. Re:I hate Vista but for $50.... by Trelane · · Score: 1
      Indeed, but you're still ascribing fault to Linux that properly lies with the hardware vendors.

      Either way, the point is firmly made that buying a Linux PC should prevent this problem.

      If you want some pointers on installing Ubuntu on your laptop, please ask away and I'll see what I can do to help.

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    14. Re:I hate Vista but for $50.... by Idaho · · Score: 1

      Except the hardware won't work. Most Dell other than their Linux machines use ATI and Broadcom, which are a HORRIBLE combination.


      I'm typing this on a Dell laptop using an ATI card and sending these very bits through a Broadcom adapter right now. They where all autodetected correctly and worked right out of the box using Ubuntu.

      What are these HORRIBLE problems you are referring to exactly?
      --
      Every expression is true, for a given value of 'true'
    15. Re:I hate Vista but for $50.... by lgarner · · Score: 1

      "This isn't a push in the right direction, it's a slap in the face!"

      So, Dell should sell the computer for several hundred dollars less, even though the Windows OS costs them a mere fraction of that? I wouldn't. That makes the Linux option a money-loser for them. Not a great business model.

  22. misprint? by breman · · Score: 1

    56Whr Lithium Ion Battery (6 cell)
    how come the Linux system doesn't have this listed?

    1. Re:misprint? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 4, Funny

      56Whr Lithium Ion Battery (6 cell)
      how come the Linux system doesn't have this listed?


      Lithium is just a plot by M$ to make you less creative. You think Theo de Raadt and Hans Reiser would have achieved what they did if they took their lithium like good little sheeple?

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    2. Re:misprint? by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      Linux doesn't need a battery. It has /dev/nuclearpowerplant piped to /dev/computer

  23. Baby steps... by kebes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're right, of course. A $50 difference is not that persuasive. However, at least the Ubuntu machine isn't more expensive than the equivalent Vista one. After all, there was considerable worry that Dell would keep the Ubuntu price higher (for a variety of reasons, such as contracts with MS or kickbacks from craplet installs, etc.).

    So, I see Dell's offering of Ubuntu machines as a small step in the right direction. And the fact that they are a bit cheaper than the Vista equivalent is also a step in the right direction.

    I highly doubt many consumers will be randomly browsing the Dell website and say "damn, those Ubuntu machines look awesome!"... but at least these prices allow those in the know to suggest to others: "If you're looking for a new computer, consider getting a Dell Ubuntu machine. Ubuntu is very stable and secure and you don't need the most expensive computer to run it. In fact, it's a bit cheaper than the equivalent Windows machine!"

    Will this give Linux a 15% marketshare overnight? No. But it's a step towards breaking the current OS monoculture... and that's a good thing.

    1. Re:Baby steps... by Miseph · · Score: 4, Funny

      But... but... it isn't solving anything overnight! Totally unacceptable! Incremental change is for the weak and stupid and non-Slashdot readers! None of this pussy ass "right step" shit, we need everything to happen right now and any change short of that is not only inconsequential but should be derided and fought tooth and nail for the M$ propaganda/sell out itg is.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    2. Re:Baby steps... by catbutt · · Score: 1

      You might get modded down as flamebait, but I wish I had points to mod you up.

    3. Re:Baby steps... by jc42 · · Score: 1

      I highly doubt many consumers will be randomly browsing the Dell website and say "damn, those Ubuntu machines look awesome!"...

      I doubt that many consumers browsing the Dell website will even see any mention of Ubuntu or linux. I just tried, starting at www.dell.com, and doing the obvious clicks to configure and order a machine. I saw lots of mentions of "Genuine Windows Vista(TM) Home Premium" (and a few without that "Genuine" ;-). But neither I nor the browser's search function could find 'ubuntu' or 'linux' on any page. There are lots of menus, and maybe some of those mention ubuntu, but I didn't see it in any that I looked at.

      A person who knows that they want ubuntu or linux (and is determined enough) can probably find it. But Dell doesn't seem to offer it, or even mention that it exists, in a way that "random browsing" would discover it.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  24. well people... by dexomn · · Score: 0, Troll

    DUH... you fucking retards.

  25. Re:Ubuntu preinstalled + Dell laptop = new custome by megaditto · · Score: 1

    So do they configure it with Enlightenment, KDE, Gnome, or IceWM?

    Just 'cause the new user is sure as heck not going to be able to chose between those in Ubuntu.

    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  26. $50? No way by DogDude · · Score: 2

    $50 bucks cheaper? Who thinks that this is going to make a single person buying a Dell change their mind? $50? One tank of gas? 1/12 of an iPhone (with no service)? 6% of the purchase price? That might not even cover shipping. You gotta be kidding me if anybody would look at this and say, "hmmm... well then... 50 bucks, huh? Well, sure, I might as well learn an entirely new operating system and find replacements for all of my programs that won't work if there's $50 at stake!"

    Slashdot has officially hit a new low.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  27. 1501 by bagofbeans · · Score: 1

    ...and did you get the WLAN DW1390 to work properly? And I don't mean just a wrapper 'round the Win driver, but all the configuration stuff too.

    1. Re:1501 by fonik · · Score: 1

      Yeah. WAP, WPA everything works fine. The win wrapper works better than the fwcutter method, but since it is a windows driver you have to make sure it's the right driver package. There are a bunch for the 1501 and some will work with less features and stability. Really it was only as hard as your average Windows driver hunt.

    2. Re:1501 by ForumTroll · · Score: 1

      The thing that annoys me about using the Windows drivers is that there have been several very serious security exploits for them. It's a real pain to have to regularly check whether I'm using the latest Windows drivers or not. I'd rather pay extra for a chipset that works properly under Linux so that I can update them using the package manager like everything else.

      On a related note, fuck Broadcom.

      --
      "A Lisp programmer knows the value of everything, but the cost of nothing." - Alan Perlis
    3. Re:1501 by spirit+of+reason · · Score: 1
      Since a somewhat recent patch to Ubuntu's kernel (incorporated some changes from 2.6.21), the bcm43xx driver works quite well. Throughput is still lower than the peak of 802.11g, but it maxes out at around 1.7 MiB/s (13.6 Mbps), which is significantly faster than my connection to the internet.

      I tried using ndiswrapper with the 1390 on my 1705, but it seemed to cause interrupt issues when using SMP and nvidia's driver (using nv or disabling SMP would prevent the issue). I did get better throughput while it worked, though, and not everyone has those issues, so YMMV.

    4. Re:1501 by fonik · · Score: 1

      That's a good point. A google search turned up a serious exploit that was patched back in November (before I loaded the driver, fortunately.)

    5. Re:1501 by wellingj · · Score: 1

      As far as Linux Wifi goes I've always gone ipw and never had a problem...
      But I have to say... when Debian makes you install firmware from 'non-free'
      it does make you feel like you are killing kittens... or masturbating... or errr....

    6. Re:1501 by bagofbeans · · Score: 1

      Which of the many "insert numeric string here".exe Dell driver installs did you use please? And presumably you used the ndiswrapper approach. The one I used gave me full visibility of the hub, but no access to any configuration that I could spot.

    7. Re:1501 by fonik · · Score: 1
      The 1501 apparently ships with a wide choice of wireless cards. The following command will get you the make and model.

      lspci | grep Wireless
      Mine is the 1390. The rest can be found here.

      I had the same problem. I used the driver from a howto guide that would let me connect for about 3 seconds before turning off my card until I rebooted. If Dell would just use different file names for their different driver files, this wouldn't be a problem.
  28. Old news.... by sachu · · Score: 0

    someone had it figured out long time back.... http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/05/25/ 1529201

  29. Re:$50? No way by Trelane · · Score: 1
    Dude, you're not even a Linux guy. You have no room to whine.

    I think the Linux users are pretty happy about saving $50 for not having to buy Windows. I know I am.

    --

    --
    Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
  30. Trialware by kylehase · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Let's take a look at some prices:

    • Dell bulk OEM price about $50 ?
    • Dell incentives from trialware/crapware $50 ? (I hear it's better these days)
    • Net $0

    • Ubuntu price $0
    • Dell incentives from trialware/crapware $0
    • Net $0
    So IMO a $50 savings for Ubuntu is actually impressive.
    --
    You want fun, go home and buy a monkey!
    1. Re:Trialware by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you have any figures for Dell OEM pricing or incentives from trialware or crapware?

      The cost per Vista Home Basic OEM is about $99 to end users.

      http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070124-8696 .html

      But volume discounts are not illegal as far as I know, so they probably still charge Dell less than the OEM price if they do thousands of installs. Googling around turns up quotes for Vista like "$50 for Home Basic rising to to $100 for Home Premium", but no hard figures and nothing on the record from an OEM.

      Looking at the amount of junk installed on Dells by default I think there's probably a significant amount of cash involved. I had a friend in Taiwan who was seriously considering entering her credit card number when the anti virus trial ran out and it started to nag her until I told her it was a waste of time. So presumably the junk companies make a hefty amount of cash out of trialware, maybe fifty companies making a buck each is possible.

      On the other hand the fact that Dell discount $50 for no Windows makes me think that the spyware kickback is less than this, and in fact close to zero, since this seems to be close to the rumoured Dell OEM Windows cost.

      All this of course makes it very unlikely that Apple would OEM OSX by the way. They'd get $50-$100 off a Dell running OS X most likely at the low end of this, but they presumably make much more off genuine Apple hardware. Dells would also force them to spend more on supporting all commodity PC hardware rather than being able to cherry pick which components like they can do on Apple hardware.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  31. testable hypothesis by fonik · · Score: 1, Funny

    Well then I assume that you are running Windows and already paid the $50 extra?

    RTFM.
    I guess it didn't work. :(

    Mod me down. It was soooo worth it.

  32. "take hold of their dreams and run Linux." by isobelle · · Score: 1

    laying it on a bit thick aren't we?

    1. Re:"take hold of their dreams and run Linux." by timmarhy · · Score: 2, Funny

      hah i know, it's pretty pathetic if your dream is to run linux on a crummy dell laptop.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  33. Put up or shut up. by RomeReactor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is _exactly_ what most people that wanted Linux pre-installed in their PCs said they wouldn't do: whine about details. Why can't I get a better battery? Why is it only 50$ cheaper? Why is it gray?... We wanted this; now it's time we show we can backup our statements with cash. Vote. Wallet. Now.

    1. Re:Put up or shut up. by WK2 · · Score: 1

      This is _exactly_ what most people that wanted Linux pre-installed in their PCs said they wouldn't do: whine about details.

      I don't recall agreeing to that. I can't imagine anyone else on slashdot would either.

      --
      Write your own Choose Your Own Adventure. http://www.freegameengines.org/gamebook-engine/
    2. Re:Put up or shut up. by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Your post makes me wish I'd saved a mod point.

      +1 Truth

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    3. Re:Put up or shut up. by Tim_UWA · · Score: 1

      Who modded this insightful?
      "Buy this Ubuntu computer for $50 cheaper than this Windows computer which has better parts" is not "Ubuntu is cheaper than Windows." Therefore, TFA is a complete load. Hence, complaint. Unless you're okay with being misled and lied to.

      Of course, it could just be a printing error.

    4. Re:Put up or shut up. by sinthetek · · Score: 1

      Insightful? I believe most of the people complaining about the price being only $50 cheaper and not worth the switch are those who dislike Linux and consider it a failure anyway unless I'm sorely mistaken

    5. Re:Put up or shut up. by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1
      But one problem is that a lot of Linux desktop users _are_ whiny discontents. This still isn't going to get a lot of people to suddenly and magically shift to Linux. For the vast majority of computer users, the simple fact they can't go to Big Box Mart and get software and hardware off the shelf if they need it is a major factor. While support is a lot better than it used to be, there is still a lot of stuff that won't work without some tinkering by the end user. Most people don't have the time to go search out and see, "Well will latest model XYZ printer/scanner work with my computer?"

      I spent 3 solid years with Linux as a desktop from 1999-2002 mainly for web development/testing. But my sound card never worked, no scanner support, printer didn't work (HP 710 series), etc. So I had a dual boot to separate HDD's with Windows NT & later Win 2k Pro. I was sold on Unix being a superior platform, but Linux was a hassle and just as much, if not more, than windows sometimes. This was back when I had time to tinker with computers. I know things have gotten better, but still, can I go buy that Canon scanner and know 100% it will work?

      I also worked at a software company that ported an app to Linux for a short period of time and all the Linux crowd did was complain. "It only works on RH. It' won't work on RH with my custom hacked uber kernel. Why don't you support XYZ distro. I would use it if it was free." This was 2001 and early 2002 and it REALLY turned me off Linux and the community. Plenty of good folks out there in Linux land and on the server side of things, it's a different story. Especially when replacing older, extremely expensive Unix boxes. And most of those folks I've worked with in the back room data centers have been 100% professionals. But the user "community" is filled with in ordinate number of people who like to do nothing more than complain.

      When Apple released OSX 10.2 I saw the chance of "Hey all the nifty stuff of OS Unix AND commercial software support." And I wasn't the only one. I knew, and still know, more Linux people that switched to Mac than window users that switched for desktop/laptop support. Hell, I've even noticed that Office Depot now carries, although be it small, software selection for the Mac. It was the "Cake and eat it too" OS. Not only that, but Mac's have gotten the reputation of "plug it in and it works". Especially on the laptop side. (which back in 2002 Linux and notebooks usually didn't get along too well.)

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  34. Re:$50? No way by rm999 · · Score: 2

    50 dollars AND you don't have to uninstall Vista and then install Ubuntu. Sounds like a decent deal to me.

  35. Re:$50? No way by DogDude · · Score: 1

    I'm not whining. I'm saying that $50 isn't going to convince anybody to switch. That's absurd.

    Good for you if you get to save $50. That's great.

    And for the record, I have a FreeBSD box that I'm using at home right now for my music collection (FreeNas).

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  36. Re:Is Ubuntu good? Maybe. by catmistake · · Score: 1

    In Ubuntu's case, the GUI looks familiar
    Yup... Gnome on Ubuntu looks very similar to Gnome on Red Hat or Gentoo. OK, but for themes (colors and such) its just the same. Same with KDE -- K Desktop looks amazingly like K Desktop on other systems (even K on OS X). I'll bet anything Xfce and Fluxbox on Ubuntu are the same on other Linux and BSD systems, but for the ubuntu/kubuntu/xubuntu/fluxbuntu mods to the ubuntu logo, its the same GUIs everywhere. Nice point there.
  37. sudo apt-get install kubuntu-desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    KDE is pretty simple to install on Ubuntu.

  38. Games On Linux by QuantumG · · Score: 1


    Here's a good 3 part article on Linux gaming:

    http://kahvipapu.com/blog/2007/06/16/linux-gaming- part-one-first-person-shooters/

    It focuses on Open Source games but it also lists many of the other titles that are available for Linux.

    Most of these games, if not all, are also available on Windows, of course. The first game listed, Warsow is an excellent Open Source FPS, whether you're on Linux or Windows. No Mac client, though I'm sure an interested Mac developer could rectify that.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:Games On Linux by Kawahee · · Score: 1

      No Mac client, though I'm sure an interested Mac developer could rectify that.
      I think they're too busy playing Photoshop CS3 already...
      --
      I'll subscribe to Slashdot when I see a month without a dupe, a typo, or an article the "editors" didn't read.
  39. Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who the fuck dreams about Linux? Ok, maybe that was too harsh. Who the fuck dreams about Linux and was holding off for $50 off a Dell?

  40. Dream? by doyoulikeworms · · Score: 0

    I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the brand of their box but by the content of their kernel.

  41. Total Cost of Ownership by Repossessed · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Doing a quick one over of the systems available, for a 15 inch screen, you're looking at 1,194 dollars for a minimum Vista notebook with full performance. (2 gigs of RAM, and a 2 GHz dual core processor). A 15 inch Ubuntu notebook, will cost you just 599 dollars. Thanks to the low hardware requirements of Linux systems. (It's quite literally twice as powerful as the desktop I'm typing from now.) There's a couple caveats there, in that I'm not sure if the optical drive and hard drive are comparable between the two. (i'm too lazy too check). And that for a desktop, the price difference won;t be as bad. (An acceptable processor and RAM for Vista gets very expensive for the notebooks, not as much so as for the desktops.) I'm also not sure how long this will last, Dell is still shipping the old 1505s for Ubuntu, the price will probably go up if they start using 1520s instead. (There's no appreciable difference in specs that I can find, though this may change once better Intel processors come out (the 1520 uses a different socket type.)). Oh, and if you want the fancy graphics stuff for Vista, you're going to need another 230 dollars (30 for the software and 200 for a 256 megabyte graphics card.) I'm not sure how much of a hardware upgrade it would take to run the 3D desktop options for Linux though, so I have no point of comparison to make there.

    --
    Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    1. Re:Total Cost of Ownership by DeviousDevil · · Score: 0

      You only need a 128MB graphics card to get all the fancy graphics in Vista - how much will one of those cost? Oh about $10 - whoopy - so what!
      Move along nothing to see here.

    2. Re:Total Cost of Ownership by tor528 · · Score: 1

      I got Beryl/AIGLX running on my girlfriend's old laptop - that is, a 1.6 GHz Celeron, Old built-in Radeon graphics card (IGP 340m, shared memory) + OSS Radeon drivers, and 512 MB PC2100 RAM. It all runs pretty smooth, too. So, "a hardware upgrade [...] to run the 3D desktop options for Linux" is going to be extremely cheap, if necessary at all.

      --
      If I think something is funny, I will probably mod it +1 Insightful. "It's funny because it's true."
    3. Re:Total Cost of Ownership by ainm · · Score: 1

      I have Beryl running on an eight year old compaq presario, with 1 gig Athlon, 256MB noname ram and some old gforce card (think it's a 5-series, not sure). It runs absolutely perfect for everday stuff, but I'd have to turn Beryl off if I was doing anything graphically intensive (which is not really likely on that old machine).

      FWIW, that same machine came preloaded with winME[1] back in the day and has gone through win2000, winXP, Gentoo and now Ubuntu. I think it runs better now on Ubuntu than it ever has.

      [1]yes, I was one of those unfortunate bastards. But hey, at least I didn't buy Vista.

  42. Re:I'll take Vista thanks :-) by sortius_nod · · Score: 5, Funny

    you just have time to cancel or allow?

  43. "Take hold of their dreams?" by jerquiaga · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I can't think of a single person that I've talked to recently that said, "you know what, I'm just dreaming of the day when Dell will sell me a computer with Ubuntu on it so I can finally run Linux." Most of the people I know what know what to do with themselves if they had Linux on their computer. If everyone I know suddenly had Linux, the number of phone calls I get about computers would increase by a factor of ten, at least. I would be willing to pay the extra $50 for them to get the Vista version, since it would at least be less scary for them.

    1. Re:"Take hold of their dreams?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and I'd bet 50$ that most of the stuff they come to you for has to do with some sort of crapware/spyware problem thus with ubuntu all installed to begin with [not hard though, maybe even better than windows] and I also bet that if they have the brain capacity to search on google they can find any program they want, a few clicks and its done. you'd be out of the job

    2. Re:"Take hold of their dreams?" by tuxic · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't you rather have those calls for 5 months and then never hearing from them ever again once they have gotten used to the desktop environment, apps and menus? I mean, once it's part of their everyday use, they are going to stop calling as long as they aren't attempting anything wild on their own risk all of a sudden that they end up feeling lost with; think: "Hmmm, what does this mysterious button in the system maintenance section do that I just a moment ago gave my root password to access?"

      --
      "People are stupid. Persons are smart" -- Agent K, MiB.
  44. Re:I'll take Vista thanks :-) by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Informative

    you just have time to cancel or allow?

    Yawn. Now that this has been repeated to death, let's face it: all other OS have similar elevation dialogs. OSX has it, and other flavors of BSD, Linux has it.

    It's part of life when you don't run as root all the time.

    The fact you may get too many of them on Vista usually signifies improperly setup account, or poorly written software. In my experience, the elevation dialog only pops up rarely and when you'd really expect it to.

  45. Runs the programs you need by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

    Several years back I tried Mandrake. I couldn't run any games, and I longed for various Windows apps I missed. About two years ago I gave Gentoo a try, and found that the Linux desktop has progressed greatly. There is plenty of stable, feature-rich apps for all my needs on Linux. In fact, some of the Linux apps far surpass anything I can find on Windows (like Amarok).

    It isn't hard to take KDE and make it look and operate like Windows enough that people will just sit down and know how to use it.

    Really, all that leaves on the list is that everyone else does.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  46. confused - lower price is good or bad? by LinuxEagle · · Score: 1

    I saw this a while ago and the discussion was going on how unfair it was that dell was *not* giving a 50$ discount, now that there seems to be a discount** folks are saying how the discount is not worth anything. :S A lower price, if its true, is worth something though I would think. **Also note as other posters have above, the Ubuntu laptop is seemingly missing a battery, or the article has an omission.

    1. Re:confused - lower price is good or bad? by howlingmadhowie · · Score: 1
      not quite. the microsoft trolls (and we know there are quite a few of them on slashdot) are complaining about how the discount isn't worth anything.

      the way i see it, the ubuntu laptops from dell will have two main customers:
      1. private people who already run linux and want a new machine with a minimum of hassle
      2. companies which run linux but don't want to spend out on a workstation when a modern pc is probably already a lot more powerful than their older workstations
      total sales? i dunno. i know that if dell started selling linux pcs in europe, i'd probably buy one as a way of being counted for spending my money on free software (at the moment i'm thinking of getting a sun ultra, so the ubuntu pc would be a lot cheaper).
  47. Re:$50? No way by spirit+of+reason · · Score: 1

    It might make a difference if you were shopping on the low end. And actually, the difference between the two Inspiron 530s is $100, and that's if you don't upgrade the Windows machine to the GeForce 7300 like the Ubuntu machine has (for $50 more). $150 sounds like quite the deal to me.

  48. What about resale value? by MSRedfox · · Score: 1

    While saving $50 might be nice in the short term, what does it do to resale value? I find that older laptops that come with a nice COA for Windows resell for more then one without it. Even with the hard drive removed, a simple COA sticker increases the value.

  49. Re:I'll take Vista thanks :-) by Silver+Gryphon · · Score: 1

    Thank you. I run Vista Ultimate and only have to authorize things like display settings changes, software updates, anything where a virus or trojan would happily ransack my system. So, I'd say I have to Cancel or Allow three apps per week, and the installs that don't comply with Vista's installer prompt me two or three times, but only during the install. Web browsing, developing, debugging don't bug me for authorization. It's not really disruptive, just a change in behavior.

    The whole "Cancel or Allow" thing is great marketing on Apple's part, but FUD just like Windows Fanboys like to spin about Linux or Linux Fanboys spin about Windows.

    Of course, it would be nice if I had more info on what I'm authorizing. That's up to the developers though. The OS has little way of predicting what's about to happen.

  50. ONLY $50? by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    I can't believe that a Linux distro, even at one-of prices, costs them only $50 more than Vista, even at maximum quantity discount prices. I'm guessing they're expecting a lot more support problems with Ubuntu (not in and of itself, but as a Linux install) and charging more up front to offset that.

    OTOH, if I could have gotten Ubuntu installed on this $399 Dimension system when I bought it a year ago, I'd have paid the same. But then I've done my own Linux support since Slackware 1.0. I just don't see too many who'd planned on getting a Dell choosing Linux instead for only $50 off.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  51. Re:$50? No way by Sancho · · Score: 1

    The rhetoric in here is really getting thick.

    Uninstall Vista? Please. The Ubuntu partitioner does it for you.

    Now personally, I'd probably reinstall Ubuntu anyway. I just don't trust OEMs not to put crapware on it, even in Linux. What I get for buying Linux pre-installed on the Dell is a reasonable expectation that all of the hardware should work, nothing more.

    But maybe that's just me.

  52. Ubuntu IS ready for the desktop by moosesocks · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been a pretty strong opponent of Linux on the desktop for a long, long time now.

    The first distro installed was Debian 2.2 off of floppy disks, so I've been at this for quite a while. I'd try it out, work with the desktop for a few weeks, and inevitably move back to Windows. I went through the motions with this for a few years, trying out Red Hat, Mandrake, Slackware, and Gentoo in the process. Each time, I reverted back to Windows.

    I eventually got a mac, and that was that. I had my unix, and I had my desktop, and I was happy. At school, I would occasionally use the computer labs (running Fedora Core + KDE) to compile some code, or whip up a quick TeX document. It was usable to me, but clearly not ready for the average user (that's what my mac's for)

    Fast forward to last month. My mac at work was acting up, and because I only use it to run MATLAB through a remote X server, I figured that I'd give the Ubuntu PPC port a try.

    On first impressions, I'm going to go out on a limb and say that it's just as good as, if not better than Windows for desktop usage. The default install is simple and very well polished. I eventually switched to Xubuntu, which was also extremely simple. The settings/preferences panel is top-notch, and the package manager is flawlessly integrated into the OS.

    I still like MacOS for my home computer, if only because of iLife, and all the multimedia and photo/video editing apps that Linux doesn't have yet. However, Ubuntu is a very viable competitor to Windows, even for somebody who's never used Linux before.

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    1. Re:Ubuntu IS ready for the desktop by warlock_07 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Except for gaming dude

    2. Re:Ubuntu IS ready for the desktop by dave1g · · Score: 1

      Stuck with matlab? You might want to give GNU Octave a try, its a free clone of Matlab. http://www.octave.org/

    3. Re:Ubuntu IS ready for the desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2.2? I started with 1.2. n00b!

    4. Re:Ubuntu IS ready for the desktop by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Don't use MathLab. Period. There is no reason to use that piece of s**t. Unless you are doing very small (less than 30 lines is normaly ok) applications with no execution time requirements (a program can take days to run at MatLab, and still finish in seconds when you port it to another language) and already has a powerfull machine that you have no better use for (it seems that no machine is powerfull enough for MathLab, but the more the better).

      And, if you are not at the US, add "deb http://www.debian-multimedia/ stable main" to you /etc/apt/sources.list. That will take care of multimedia.

    5. Re:Ubuntu IS ready for the desktop by Trelane · · Score: 1

      Plus, its student edition won't require you to have the Documentation CD mounted.

      #!%!! fascists

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    6. Re:Ubuntu IS ready for the desktop by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I've been a pretty strong opponent of Linux on the desktop for a long, long time now.

      s/opponenet/proponent, judging by the rest of your post...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    7. Re:Ubuntu IS ready for the desktop by Insightfill · · Score: 1

      I couldn't find the original Mac disks, so I was using Ubuntu 7.04 on an old iMac for my daughters for a month until I ran until some hitches:

      1) Video - some weird bug with this particular old-school iMac resulted in LONG delays, as the CPU and vid card fought over almost everything. Logging in would take about an hour from password to menus. Found a good article online that solved this.
      2) Flash - some would say "no flash" is a good thing, but for a six year old kid, it's the world. Adobe doesn't seem to want to release flash for PPC, and with Apple dropping the platform, too, I don't see it ever coming out. I had to scour for the old 10.3 install disks and "give in". Still, it's a nice machine and nice OS.

      However, a month later I rebuilt the home server and went from "Windows and a Debian VMWare image" to "Ubuntu 7.04 with a Windows VM image." Not going back. Nice setup.

    8. Re:Ubuntu IS ready for the desktop by Vincentt · · Score: 1

      I think he wants to say that he *used to be* an opponent, but when he gave it another try lately his opinion changed and now he thinks it is ready for the desktop.

  53. Ubuntu Inspiron DESKTOP $150 cheaper than Vista? by MojoStan · · Score: 4, Informative
    TFA refers to $50 savings for an Ubuntu Inspiron notebook over a Vista Home Basic notebook.

    However, I just did a quick comparison of Ubuntu vs Vista Home Basic on Dell's new Inspiron desktops (Ubuntu 530N vs Vista 530), configuring them as closely as possible, and the Ubuntu desktop was $150 cheaper. Did I miss something in the configuration? Here's what I configured (copied/pasted from the last page before adding to the shopping cart):

    • Inspiron 530 with Vista Home Basic ($479)
      Intel®Pentium® dual-core processor E2140 (1MB L2,1.60GHz,800 FSB)
      Genuine Windows Vista Home Basic
      No Monitor
      512MB Single Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 667MHz - 1DIMM
      160GB Serial ATA Hard Drive (7200RPM) w/DataBurst Cache
      48X CDRW/DVD Combo Drive
      256MB NVIDIA Geforce 7300LE TurboCache
      Integrated 7.1 Channel Audio
      Dell USB Keyboard and Dell Optical USB Mouse
      56K PCI Data Fax Modem
      Microsoft Works 8. DOES NOT INCLUDE MS WORD
      1 Yr In-Home Service, Parts + Labor - Next Business Day
      Free 3GB DataSafe Online Backup for 1Year
      Adobe Software Adobe® Acrobat® Reader 7.0
      Integrated 10/100 Ethernet
    • Inspiron 530N with Ubuntu ($329)
      Intel®Pentium® dual-core processor E2140 (1MB L2,1.60GHz,800 FSB)
      Ubuntu Desktop Edition version 7.04
      No Monitor
      512MB Single Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 667MHz - 1DIMM
      160GB Serial ATA Hard Drive (7200RPM) w/DataBurst Cache
      48X CD-RW/ DVD Combo Drive
      256MB NVIDIA Geforce 7300LE TurboCache
      Integrated 7.1 Channel Audio
      Dell USB Keyboard and Dell Optical USB Mouse
      1 Yr In-Home Service, Parts + Labor - Next Business Day
      No Modem Option
      Integrated 10/100 Ethernet
      No Productivity software pre-installed
    Notes: Integrated Intel GMA 3100 and free 56K modem were available options for Windows but not Ubuntu (I'm assuming it's a driver issue for Ubuntu). For some strange reason, the Ubuntu system is configured with an optional $170 LCD (I removed it for the comparison). The warranty/support for the Ubuntu system covers hardware only and software support can be purchased from Canonical (or you can use their forums for free). The Vista system's warranty includes some software support, of course.
    --
    TO START
    PRESS ANY KEY

    Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

  54. Re:ONLY $50 *LESS* than Vista? by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1

    I can't believe that a Linux distro, even at one-of prices, costs them only $50 more than Vista ... Er, um, no. They're now charging $50 less for Ubuntu than for Vista. -- I take this to mean that they're expecting to make it a Profit source, relative to Vista.

    Remember, they're making it available for free, but they're not providing support (you get to go to 'the community' for support, or buy support directly from Canonical). All they have to provide support for is the hardware, and Ubuntu makes it a lot easier to diagnose hardware problems than Windows does. (and Vista is probably gonna be a lot worse with all the problems from DRM interactions).

    In other words, $50 is probably the expected average per-user drop in support charges vs. Vista. Dell then gets to pocket the Windows OEM price as pure profit. (or vice-versa if I'm wrong).

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  55. Brand reliability by lukesky321 · · Score: 1

    When one goes to buy any product one will usually choose a brand name that is familar and reliable to oneself over a less known brand name and will at most times pay more for this product. Obviously most people have not heard of linux and if I didn't know what it was I most likely would not choose it over a windows product which I had used all my life.

  56. For those who say they will buy their own rigs... by Zombie+Ryushu · · Score: 1

    You can't build your own Laptop. I ordered an Ubuntu Laptop.

    But I ordered it because it was the cheapest laptop with a Linux-Preload.

  57. Re:Ubuntu Inspiron DESKTOP $150 cheaper than Vista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Ubuntu system seems to qualify for a $100 discount for some reason, and would normally be priced at $429, for another $50 difference. That's a nice little computer for $329.

  58. Re:Ubuntu preinstalled + Dell laptop = new custome by satoshi1 · · Score: 1

    Why would they need to choose? The average Windows user has no idea that computers can run with a different GUI layout. They don't know about Blackbox for Windows or LiteStep or GeoShell, how are they going to know about XFCE and KDE and IceWM and Fluxbox? Since Ubuntu comes with Gnome, many users will associate Gnome as Ubuntu. Linspire comes with KDE, so that is the Linspire interface. There is no need for them to choose which interface they use. Just give them something and they'll adapt.

  59. Dell is always doing half-hearted attempt by 2Bits · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From our own experience, what Dell is doing is just half-hearted attempt, at best, to gather some good press. Their offer of Linux-based laptop is ridiculous. And anyone who thinks that the move may be the beginning of Linux world domination, well, hate to break it to you, that's pipe dream.

    We had bought a few Dell laptops in the last six months, and every one of them is so-called Linux-based laptop. When we open the box, here's the list of what we found:

    - The machine and components, the usual suspects (no surprise here)
    - one CD containing a partial list of different drivers for ... guess... that's right, Windows. And I said partial list because you still need to go out tracking some of the most important drivers, such the graphic driver, sound driver, etc. (I'll explain later)
    - one CD of junk softwares that you will never use, for ... guess again... that's right, Windows.
    - 3 CDs of Red Flag Linux (yeah, in China, that is).

    I booted up the machine, half of them came with DOS installed, but you can't do anything much as there's no driver for anything anyway. The other half came with absolutely nothing installed. Empty disk.

    Ok, just for the heck of it, to see if they actually tried to install the linux distro themselves. I installed Red Flag Linux, it installed fine, but missing a few drivers, or won't detect properly. I had to mess with it for a while to get it to work, but still the graphics is not working optimally.

    Ok, so far, I don't think any buyer is going with Linux here.

    So, I installed Windows XP. And the drivers CD is missing some serious drivers, I ended up with a system which was not any better than with Linux. I looked up the support web site, enter the serial number, and the system told me the serial number of that machine does not exist. Who cares, I just downloaded a bunch of drivers to try out, those drivers that are published for the models close to the one I have. Doesn't work.

    After half a day of messing around, I called tech support. Nice guy, actually. He told me that the drivers downloaded from the web site don't work, because I have a "pirated" copy of Windows XP. Ok, fine, give me those that work then. He emailed a few links to get those missing drivers. None of these links showed up on their web site.

    Go figure. With that kind of so-called "support", I doubt Joe Sixpacks is going to have Linux on that machine.

    1. Re:Dell is always doing half-hearted attempt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that Dell is PRE-INSTALLING Ubuntu, and everything is included and open sourced in their install except for optional (included) proprietary Conexant Winmodem drivers. Suspend, wireless 'just works'. Read some reviews of this new sale, it's not 'oh we're shipping FreeDOS' all over again.

      Go to Direct2Dell.com to see what hardware work they did too: http://direct2dell.com/one2one/archive/2007/05/24/ 15994.aspx (in ogg format, to boot).

      System76.com is another good OEM.

    2. Re:Dell is always doing half-hearted attempt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Under your name I see this address: http://www.idsignet.com./ I guess, maybe I'm wrong, that you live in Asia. Right now Ubuntu is preinstalled on Dell computers only in USA, so what are you talking about?

    3. Re:Dell is always doing half-hearted attempt by Warbothong · · Score: 2, Insightful
      So what you're saying is:

      You bought some laptops with Linux

      The Linux system wasn't preloaded

      The Red Flag Linux supplied didn't have all needed drivers

      This is an unfortunate situation, but the point of these Ubuntu preloaded systems is to address these issues. The rest of your post is some garbage about not being supplied the correct drivers for DOS or Windows XP with you Linux laptops. You know what? I didn't get BSD drivers with my Dell laptop. I'm gonna sue!

  60. Re:I'll take Vista thanks :-) by earnest+murderer · · Score: 0, Troll

    Indeed, because of bugs in Apples OS and Apple Script I get oddball password demands much more often than Windows. Apparently sudo only works most of the time on OS X. Never mind the applications that want to jack with the system which don't actually need to. Or to be fair, the OS doesn't do what it is supposed to do so you MUST jack with the system to make your app. work. Fonts are a good example of something which has been busted in some fashion at one time or another on several platforms. Sometimes for many releases. Personally I like the ridicule option... Application XYZ is doing ABC. That's not recommended behavior and is usually indicative of malicious software. We recommend you cancel the operation and remove it from the system. Cancel/Cancel and remove application/Allow but sandbox that shit/Allow your shitty software to crap up the place. Clearly I'll get nowhere with the MBA's and their "partners" but it sure would get developers, 1st and 3rd party, to clean up their act. Of course that would also require OS vendors make sure their API's did the right thing, and the documentation was complete and correct. Pfft... that'll be the day.

    --
    Platform advocacy is like choosing a favorite severely developmentally disabled child.
  61. Re:I'll take Vista thanks :-) by cheater512 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    The fact you may get too many of them on Vista usually signifies improperly setup account, or poorly written software. Oh and Microsoft is never known for poorly coded software. ;)
  62. Re:$50? No way by LingNoi · · Score: 4, Informative

    Say an SMB buys 10 computers..
    $50x10 = $500 savings

    Say an Enterprise begins its upgrade/replace rollout of 10,000 computers..
    $50x10,000 = $500,000 Savings

    It might not seem a lot to a 1 purchase user but that money adds up. In my university they didn't spend $20 extra dollars per Dell for an optic mouse because of the costs.

  63. No, it wouldn't by Rix · · Score: 1

    You can buy Vista OEM from any decent shop at about that price. They do have to sell it with hardware, but they'll count a $10 USB drive as that.

    The Vista license you get from Dell will only work with that specific Dell model.

  64. Ubuntu is great for Tech Support by LingNoi · · Score: 1

    There are numerous great advantages to an Ubuntu desktop that windows Admins might not know of.

    For example you can point all your desktop computers to your own Upgrade server. This allows you to test the new patches coming in from Ubuntu before you add them to your own upgrade repository or add your own packages. This allows you to be in control of patching for your work place although it is often not needed unless you are doing a distribution upgrade which needs testing before you upgrade all the machines at work.

    Another great one is being able to SSH into a machine. No more having to baby step a user through GUIs. Just ask what the problem is, login to their machine from your own and fix it yourself, they won't even know you logged into their computer and they can continue working on their machine while your fixing some other problem with their computer!

    You can also remote desktop in if you wish to see a GUI instead of a command prompt but that will take control of the users computer.

    1. Re:Ubuntu is great for Tech Support by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      For example you can point all your desktop computers to your own Upgrade server. This allows you to test the new patches coming in from Ubuntu before you add them to your own upgrade repository or add your own packages. This allows you to be in control of patching for your work place although it is often not needed unless you are doing a distribution upgrade which needs testing before you upgrade all the machines at work.
      I can do this on Windows.

      Another great one is being able to SSH into a machine. No more having to baby step a user through GUIs. Just ask what the problem is, login to their machine from your own and fix it yourself, they won't even know you logged into their computer and they can continue working on their machine while your fixing some other problem with their computer!
      That's actually not the case. Windows Vista does have a remote console login, and on Linux, even if you have ssh, that doesn't give you the ability to easily fix random errors that are popping up in kmail etc. I should know, I admin both Linux and Windows systems.

      Usually this is where tools like x11vnc are quite useful in solving issues remotely.

      So far, there are some things 'Linux' desktops tend to lack in which bother me, such as:
      • Roaming profiles (as in, works offline too)
      • DHCP quarantine (don't have upto date stuff? You're forced onto another subnet where you only have access to update servers)
      • Lack of centeralized group policy settings and global login management on the majority of distributions -- So far the only one I know that does it and works is, SuSE enterprise desktop
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    2. Re:Ubuntu is great for Tech Support by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      I can do this on Windows.
      What you're talking about is Microsoft Windows patches when I was talking about being able to control updates for all the programs on the operating system and being able to add your own programs and your own updates if you wanted.

      That's actually not the case. Windows Vista does have a remote console login
      I don't care what Windows Vista has as I was talking about Ubuntu. I fail to see why Vista having a remote console debunks my point that you can login and fix common problems via SSH in Ubuntu. Please explain why SSH on Ubuntu is "not the case".
    3. Re:Ubuntu is great for Tech Support by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      What you're talking about is Microsoft Windows patches when I was talking about being able to control updates for all the programs on the operating system and being able to add your own programs and your own updates if you wanted.
      Nope, I can push out applications just fine thanks to Microsoft Systems Management Server.

      I don't care what Windows Vista has as I was talking about Ubuntu.
      The way you said it, it came off as something like a unique feature to Ubuntu that Windows doesn't have, it does. Mind you, you can replicate ssh functionality perfectly by installing cygwin with sshd (ssh-server is not installed with Ubuntu by default).

      I fail to see why Vista having a remote console debunks my point that you can login and fix common problems via SSH in Ubuntu.
      Other than the fact that Vista comes with it preinstalled (not that this is a real argument since you still need to set it up to get it working) -- What common problems? Give me examples.

      I can't think of any common desktop problems that can be solved over with just ssh (Well, possible with X forwarding, but that's something else).

      Please explain why SSH on Ubuntu is "not the case".
      I'm just saying I don't see anything that special about it for workstation systems.

      The majority of workstation issues need to be tested some how, you need a GUI for that. If kmail is crashing over the fact one of it's tmp folders in '.kde/share/apps/kmail/mail/something/tmp' was lost due to a power cut (a example of something I've encountered), you can't just ssh in and fix it.

      You don't know what the problem is without looking yourself at the application and finding out what exactly the error is (hopefully you don't need 'strace' anymore to find this out). Then you can take a guess on how to try to fix the problem and try it.

      Mind you, I don't really get any 'common' support issues on Linux workstations, but maybe that's because I setup the systems properly. This is also the case with Windows workstations I administrate.
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    4. Re:Ubuntu is great for Tech Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      use ssh -X and the admin can remotely open GUI applications running on the user's machine, without interfering with the user's current session.

    5. Re:Ubuntu is great for Tech Support by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1
      Just to elaborate on what I meant by common issues in my post to prevent confusion:

      • Earlier in the post I was referring to issues that tend to occure commonly, but the issues themselves were not encountered regularly at all (like a one time thing), like say the wireless doesn't connect.
      • Later in the post, I was referring to common issues, where the issues encountered occurred quite often.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  65. Re:Ubuntu Inspiron DESKTOP $150 cheaper than Vista by MojoStan · · Score: 1

    The Ubuntu system seems to qualify for a $100 discount for some reason DOH! I missed that. That ($100 off limited time offer) is definitely the reason why it's $150 cheaper instead of $50 cheaper. I feel like a dope.

    That's a nice little computer for $329. I agree (even if the price is temporary). The "Pentium dual-core E2140" is based on the Core 2 Duo architecture (with less L2 cache and slower FSB). The non-integrated GeForce 7300LE video card and four DIMM slots are rare in a desktop that's this cheap. I think I'd have a difficult time building a comparable desktop this cheap using parts from Newegg or Mwave.
    --
    TO START
    PRESS ANY KEY

    Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

  66. Only $50 cheaper? by scoot80 · · Score: 1

    Seriously. A free operating system versus Windows Vista, and all they can come up with is $50 cheaper? You might as well buy the Vista version, then install Ubuntu - at least that way you will have a licensed copy of Vista that you can put back on later..

    1. Re:Only $50 cheaper? by zpeterz63 · · Score: 1

      $50 is probably not much (if any) more than Dell pays for a license of Vista. It really wouldn't make a lot of sense for them to price a model that they will sell many fewer of for less profit. I can't say I blame them. It makes good business sense.

      That being said, I'm not really sure what niche they're going to fill with this. Those people who are hardcore Linuxites will likely not bother with Ubuntu (or Dell, for that matter) and the average user is going to want Windows anyways. Then, as you were mentioning, the slightly advanced user is going to see that they can just order a machine with an OS that typically costs $180 (I have no clue how much it costs. I'm guessing) and get it for only $50 than if they didn't include it are going to realize that they can just stick in the Ubuntu disk themselves have the exact same thing otherwise. Granted, there will be a small amount that think the $50 discount is worth it, but they will be few and far between.

      As much as I'd like to see one of the big players in manufactured computers offer a Linux edition, I think it looks like Dell is setting itself up for a big failure on this one.

  67. HP has been doing something simila for a while by EjectButton · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While it is a good first step that Dell is selling Ubuntu machines, and not charging you (as much) for a license that you aren't even purchasing, HP has been doing this for quite a while though they don't seem to get much press for it.

    If you look at hp laptops and desktops in their "business" section many of them will list "FreeDOS" as an available os, or if they have a "Configure PC" link under the model often times it means you can choose between Windows and FreeDOS in the configuration options. One difference may be that if you get a FreeDOS pc from HP, format the drive and put Linux on it HP probably isn't going to give you any software support whereas maby Dell (or Canonical?) offers some level of support included in their price. Though if you are willing to forgo softwate technical support and just want hardware warranty coverage (for example if you are a large institution purchasing many computers is bulk) you can get a larger discount for non-windows machines from HP than Dell. The price varies but for most of their business notebooks and desktops the difference between a model with Windows XP/Vista and that same model with FreeDOS is usually $75-$150

    Hopefully Dell's apparent success in selling Ubuntu desktops (and the publicity that has come with it) will push HP into doing something similar, I am a bit surprised Dell beat them to the punch on this one considering HP has:
    been encouraging the use of Debian on the server end for a while
    http://h20331.www2.hp.com/services/cache/442406-0- 0-0-121.html

    Already provides good driver support for Linux with regard to printers
    http://hplip.sourceforge.net/

    And the current "Linux CTO" is a former Debian project leader
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bdale_Garbee

    I would expect to see more announcements like this in the near future from the OEMs. Whatever argument the OEMs still had against selling desktop Linux and thereby irritating Microsoft was recently dealt a significant blow by Microsoft's announcement that they would begin selling their own machines http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/06/ 28/181204
    which from the OEMs perspective has changed Microsoft from an annoying element that everyone has to deal with and who gets a cut of their profit, to a company that is now moving towards being a direct competitor.

    1. Re:HP has been doing something simila for a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The trouble with that is, with FreeDos there is no guarantee that any of the hardware is Linux compatible. Onthe other hand, with the Dell boxes, you know that all the hardware can work with Linux, even if you intend to wipe Ubuntu and replace it with some other distro. I don't think HP are going to shift many boxes to Linux users until their buyers can be assured in some way that the damn things will work after the software installation.

  68. Re:For those who say they will buy their own rigs. by borizz · · Score: 1

    Actually, you can.

    You can get all the parts from a Built to Order laptop store. For a little extra money, they assemble it for you and you get warranty.

    Granted, it's not as easy as getting parts for a desktop PC, but it is not impossible.

  69. Vista Dell? by Seumas · · Score: 2, Funny

    You've got to be kidding me.. Ubuntu Dell versus . . . V.D.?

  70. Ubuntu machines should be buried by patio11 · · Score: 1

    Look at this from Dell's perspective: the LAST thing they want is someone getting Linux installed on their computer by mistake. You can make plenty of flubups in configuring your Dell and, you know what, 99% of them are recoverable. Buy 1GB of RAM instead of 2? Probably won't notice it. Forget the carrying case? You can buy it at the store. Install Ubuntu instead of Vista Basic? Well, congratulations, thats a nice paperweight you've got there. (Yep, sorry: put 90% of America in front of Ubuntu and its a paperweight that can't run Office, IE, iTunes, or World of Warcraft.)

    When Dell delivers paperweights, that will be THEIR problem, not Slashdot's problem. They're the ones that are going to field the "ZOMG WTF is this brown POS on my desktop" So they're going to bury Ubuntu where you can't find it unless you're actively looking for it.

  71. Sales figures by BigBadBus · · Score: 1

    Just how well are Dell's Linux-shipped computers selling?

    1. Re:Sales figures by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      Waaaaaaay too early to know yet.

  72. "Avoiding MS tax" pricing to get community support by ttnb · · Score: 1

    Of course, one reason why Dell can offer GNU/Linux boxes more cheaply is that if Dell manages to sell them in significant quantity, they can avoid paying MS for licenses, therefore, in the large quantities case, they will be able to make the profit they want at a lower retail price point. But right now, I'm pretty sure that what they're going for with this pricing strategy is primarily the kind of community support that they need to generate in order to reach significant quantities on their GNU/Linux based offerings in the first place. I and many other people in the community would feel bad about an offer from Dell that would give the impression of still paying the equivalent of the Microsoft tax, with only the difference of the money now staying at Dell and not going to Microsoft.

  73. that's not the same thing at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Everyone who runs Linux on a laptop knows how tricky it is to make sure your distro works with all the laptop features, and the wireless, etc.

    When Dell sells an Ubuntu-loaded laptop, you know it's going to work out of the box.
    When HP sells a FreeDos laptop, you don't know what's going to happen when you put Ubuntu on it.

  74. Ubuntu is not the best by chinhnt2k3 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Seriously Ubuntu is not the best. Mandriva is better.

    --
    Are you a scoremonkey?
    1. Re:Ubuntu is not the best by dangitman · · Score: 1

      If you like driving men, that is.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    2. Re:Ubuntu is not the best by thegnu · · Score: 1

      What, do you bunt too?

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    3. Re:Ubuntu is not the best by Qamelian · · Score: 1

      You mean Mandriva with the badly broken power management that makes it impossible to use on my laptop, which happily runs all other major Linux distros? Mandriva/Mandrake has been crap for a while. The last decent version was 10.1.

    4. Re:Ubuntu is not the best by lordtoran · · Score: 1

      From my own experience, it is indeed not the best distribution for a laptop. You are better off with a *buntu there. Mandriva 2007.1 has been a big step forward however after some buggy releases. I use Mandriva as my main workstation since two years, and it is at least on par with Ubuntu in terms of user-friendliness.

      My other PC runs Kubuntu, so I have an idea what I'm talking about :-)

      --
      Want to hear the voice of GOD? cat /boot/vmlinuz > /dev/dsp
    5. Re:Ubuntu is not the best by chinhnt2k3 · · Score: 0

      Too bad it didn't work for you. But it worked for me :D I just don't trust 1-CD distros. That's all :P

      --
      Are you a scoremonkey?
  75. Re:I'll take Vista thanks :-) by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Informative
    The dialog is not normally annoying, but at times it can be. For example, try copying an executable file from an SMB share to your "Program Files" folder. It goes like this:
    • Are you sure you want to copy an executable from a shared folder? Yes
    • Are you sure you want to write something to a system folder? Yes!
    • Sorry, Dave, I can't do that. Copying .exe files from the network into "Program Files" is disabled for security reasons. WTF???
    Which is obviously an idiocy, and one I haven't seen elsewhere (in Ubuntu, anyway; haven't had a chance to play with Mac OS).
  76. Not to be too picky, but by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    "For others, it's worth more than $50 to have a system that's free (as in freedom AND beer)."

    I guess you mean to "have a OS that's free". The system is neither free as in freedom or beer. Unless of course Dell is giving out their PCs for free and Intel is publishing all their technical documentation on their processors and licensing all their related patents for free.

  77. Re:$50? No way by Futselaar · · Score: 1

    To a college student, already scared by stories about DRM, and influenced by the FUD-ish Mac vs PC ads, the beer $50 will buy may very well be the extra incentive needed. For now, they'll probably still buy a discount laptop loaded with good ol' XP, but as that will get more difficult over time, sure, $50 will probably help. Why not?

  78. Ship Date - 18 days longer then windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They almost had a sale until I noticed both the desktops won't ship until 7/30/2007. I don't want to wait that long. Did any one see a way to make the date more reasonable? The windows versions of the same machine ship on the 12th. What's with that?

    1. Re:Ship Date - 18 days longer then windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proof that Linux is slower than Windows.

  79. 3 words! by pjr.cc · · Score: 1

    Dell, i love you.. ok, thats 4.. dam, now thats 7.. UG.

    Seriously though, that is a big plus - being a very firm fedora person, its great to see this step forward - its a big thumbs up for what linux has become!

  80. Re:I'll take Vista thanks :-) by LingNoi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The fact you may get too many of them on Vista usually signifies improperly setup account, or poorly written software.
    Yes, its always the developers fault. Poor drivers on Vista? Nvidia's fault. Too many security alerts? Software Developers fault. BSOD when plugging in a scanner? Driver makers fault.

    Lets face it Windows users never question why their most essential piece of software should be so easily broken and unrecoverable without re-installation, but lets face it they never will. They'll happily go on blaming Nvidia for their late drivers while it took Microsoft 2 years just to design the damn shutdown button.

    Please do go ahead and blame anyone you want for why your system sucks but I will never find it acceptable for my operating system to be so prone to errors and unrecoverable from a system failure whether it is Windows, Ubuntu or Mac.
  81. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Ubuntu is not good for you. I'm not alone in remembering the various Ubuntu threads in which you made yourself painfully clear that you are a trolling leech on the community instead of a participant. You are far better off with a proprietary operating system from a vendor you can throw temper tantrums at.

    Contrarily, Ubuntu is great for adults.

  82. That, and... by Poingggg · · Score: 1

    M$ seems to have VICE-ta made in a way that makes it very hard to install a real OS besides it.

    I tried it on my laptop and did not get grub working. Maybe that says more about me than about Windoze, but I just kicked Vista from my machine and replaced it with Ubuntu after Vice-ta developed some quirks like denying access to my router without me having changed anything.
    Now I still have to get some unimportant hardware working (webcam), but it's more lazyness from me than anything else it's not yet functional. But my machine is a lot faster, does not spy on me, I'm the boss over my own machine, have lots of apps to choose from and I don't have to reboot five times for every update/install. I don't see myself going back!

    --
    What person will donate an airborne act of love?
  83. Re:I'll take Vista thanks :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'll happily go on blaming Nvidia for their late drivers Yeah that's crazy! I know, let's blame Toyota instead!

    Please do go ahead and blame anyone you want for why your system sucks The guy never said his system sucks. Stop making things up.
  84. Re:$50? No way by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

    $50 bucks cheaper? Who thinks that this is going to make a single person buying a Dell change their mind?
    There are those who are inclined to use something other than Vista anyway, but might give Vista a try if it does not cost extra. Now, there is another choice at $50 less...

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  85. Saved $200 on computer by getting Ubuntu installed by Flaviu$_$ilva · · Score: 1

    I recently had a custom machine built at a local computer shop and had them install Ubuntu Feisty Fawn. They said I saved $200 versus installing Windows XP Home. One of the guys there said he'd never really used Ubuntu, and, after they installed it on my new system and it worked great, he said he'd put it on his kids' machines to save money. I bought a system from Dell, too, and both systems work great.

  86. It's not 1995 anymore. by DrYak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With the grand choice you have in Ubuntu alone, the apps, and other distro's.


    You know these "There's too much choice in Linux, it's too hard to make selection" whine-trolls we see around aren't very accurate.

    It's not 1995 anymore. The time when either you had to pick manually everything up or when the default installation included 3 different products all in crash-prone alpha version (because all the application where recent and none functioned 100% of the time requiring you to mix the use of all 3 to cover your needs) is over.

    Yes, for each task in Linux there exist at least several dozens of possible candidate application.

    *BUT* for most mainstream application, if you just Yes-click-trough the installation (something that the EULA-trained Windows user is very used to) you just get a basic set of everything you need. Most distro will provide with 1 default desktop (Gnome or KDE in most cases, depending on your religion), 1 browser (usually Firefox. Or Konqueror) 1 email program (Thunderbird, or Evolution, or KMail) 1 Office suite (OOo or Abiword+Gnumeric+etc. or KOffice).

    No need to choose a solution a default choice has been pre-maid to help you. Just hit the icon in the menu and let the default application startup.
    Want something else ? Then only you have to fire up the software package manager (Yast, Synaptic, RpmDrake, Anaconda etc. or whatever starts when you click on the icon labelled "Add/Remove software").
    And even here, there's still an easy route :
    - Most installator provide a "task oriented" mode. Want to make a web server ? Just check the box next to the webserver "Activity" and the installator will take care to provide you a default set of tools.
    - Only when you need a specific package will you have to hunt it in the list.

    And all that is when installing a distro yourself. Now, I'm sure that Dell has already put the trouble to make sure that every Ubuntu laptop ships with a perfectly functional set of basic application covering all the needed tasks. User don't have to hesitate between 4 different word processors or a dozen of different web-browsers (include a couple of text-mode only).
    Just clic on the menu entry that says "E-Mail".

    For the lazy user, everything will be, I suppose, set to go. That "burden of choice" some bloggers always complain about is left only for those who actually care to make very specific choices.
    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:It's not 1995 anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a note, "Abiword+Gnumeric+etc." is known as "GNOME Office".

      http://www.gnome.org/gnome-office/

  87. Re:Ubuntu Inspiron DESKTOP $150 cheaper than Vista by weicco · · Score: 1

    Wow! That's cheap. I think I order one and install Windows to it since I have some spare licenses ;)

    --
    You don't know what you don't know.
  88. I just can't believe this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The world is going to hell in a hand basket, and you geeks are sitting around in your parents' basements cramming Cheetos in your face and popping boners over Dell Ungabunga boxen? OMFG lame!

  89. Re:I'll take Vista thanks :-) by Weedlekin · · Score: 4, Funny

    "it took Microsoft 2 years just to design the damn shutdown button"

    Now be fair, it took them two years to design _and_ implement the shutdown _dialog_, which has several buttons on it. The pressure must have been pretty unbearable when Vista was about to ship after they'd only been given two years to decide how big those buttons should be, what order to put them in, how much space should be between them, how far to inset them from the edges of the dialog, and if that wasn't enough, also ensure that their event handling code called the correct OS routines to prevent potential disasters such as the Cancel button making the machine reformat its hard disk after sending Ballmer an insulting EMAIL. QA people and beta testers can't be relied on to spot this sort of error before the OS is being shipped out on millions of OEM machines, so the responsibility for getting it right was entirely on the shoulders of the poor shutdown dialog team, who probably used special teams of mouse-wielding robots for months to ensure that each of the buttons did exactly what it was supposed to with the legendary level of reliability that's become the hallmark of Microsoft software.

    --
    I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
  90. Re:ONLY $50 *LESS* than Vista? by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    > Er, um, no. They're now charging $50 less for Ubuntu than for Vista.

    You're right of course. I would have been too if you'd read what I meant instead of what I wrote. Funny how I don't seem to be able to get that across in print.

    Still, I don't think they're expecting to make it as much a profit point as all that. Their tech support is already problem enough, and that's with printed scripts for the drones to follow. Linux users will probably need more support, and require it to be better quality than what they provide for Windows.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  91. 50? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Thats not much. When you are spending several hundred i really doubt many will worry about 50 inorder to complicate their lives more.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  92. Non! by matt+me · · Score: 1

    Say an Enterprise begins its upgrade/replace rollout of 10,000 computers.. $50x10,000 = $500,000 Savings Dell Refuses to Sell Ubuntu to Business http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/06/20/ 1215213
  93. Re:I'll take Vista thanks :-) by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll take Vista thanks :-) Don't have time to fix Linux problems anymore.
    You must not have tried Vista yet.
    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  94. Re:$50? No way by at_slashdot · · Score: 1

    The only problem... Ubuntu Dells are not available for enterprise....

    --
    "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
  95. So why not... by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

    1. Buy Ubuntu Dell.
    2. Pirate Vista.
    3. ??? There is no ???!
    4. Profit!!!!

    1. Re:So why not... by SEMW · · Score: 1

      1. Buy Ubuntu Dell.
      2. Pirate Vista.
      3. ??? There is no ???!
      4. Wait a few months.
      5. Inadvertently install an update to Vista's version of WGA ("SPP") hidden in an innocuous looking "Update for Windows Vista" package, from Windows Update.
      6. Boot Vista, only to find that it has entered into "Reduced Functionality Mode".
      7. Discover that your task bar, desktop icons, and even wallpaper are gone; and that the only part of your system that works is your default web broswer. Which is helpfully pointing you to a page at Microsoft.com instructing you to buy a genuine copy online or be logged out automatically.
      8. Experience helplessness, anger, and rage.
      9. Boot into Dell's recovery partion, and reinstall Ubuntu with it over the top of the Vista partition.
      10. ...
      11. Profit!
      --
      What's purple and commutes? An Abelian grape.
  96. Broadcom support is fine by Laebshade · · Score: 1

    Unless you're using wireless.

  97. Re:Covered their asses. by SolitaryMan · · Score: 1

    But it's probably why they in the first place do not list these Linux computers on the front page with a huge splash saying "NEW! Dell starts offering Ubuntu, a Desktop-friendly Linux! Buy one today! Look at the revolutionary OS that's gotten easier to use!"

    They are just trying to cover their asses: if they F up with windows -- microsoft is to blame, if they F up with Ubuntu -- it's their own fault.

    --
    May Peace Prevail On Earth
  98. dreams vs. principles by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    Actually, being forced to give money to a convicted monopoly might well put more principled people off buying from Dell without this.

  99. C For Effort by christurkel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just ordered one of laptop from Dell, due in a week or so. I knew where to look and what to get. Then I did it as if I was Joe Clueless who heard about Ubuntu and wants to look at Dell and what they offer.
    Take a look at the front page of Dell.com. What do you see? Lots of products but no mention of Ubuntu. Let's look at a laptop, I see many options. I look and pick one. The option for this Ubuntu thing must be here. I pick a laptop. I look. Comes with Windows Vista Home Edition. Huh? Maybe its under "Build yours". I try that.
    I click a couple of options and see "Operating Systems" Maybe this is it? I click on it. It gives me a choice between Windows Vista Home and Home Premium.
    What he doesn't realize that its back on the product page under "Essential Links"...Open Source PCs. Click on that and you get a choice between "Shop Ubuntu" or "Shop for FreeDos" which are under "Shop for Dell PCs with Windows"
    I know that Dell Ubuntu products are aimed at tech enthusiasts and Open Source fans but if Dell hopes to be successful beyond a niche market they need to try a lot harder.

    --

    CDE open sourced! https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/
  100. I took Vista by camperdave · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I took Vista because I had no choice. It came with the HP Pavilion laptop I purchased, and MS would not allow the store to sell any other MS operating system. No big deal, I thought. I made the system restore disks as per instructions. I then shrank Vista's NTFS partition using the Vista tools, and installed Ubuntu in the empty spot. I left the HP restore partition alone. I was dual booting fine for a couple of days. However, it started taking longer and longer for Vista to shut down. Now it won't boot at all.

    I've tried "Last known good configuration". I've tried "Repair your system". I've tried "Safe Mode", "Debug mode", and "Safe mode with Command Prompt". I've tried the HP restore partition. I've tried the System restore disks that I made. I've even tried the Vista Anytime Upgrade disk that came with the machine. Vista refuses to boot up. The closest I get is a blank blue screen with a mouse pointer. I've left the machine for hours, hoping that the desktop would populate, but no dice. Many people are in the same boat that I am. Vista hangs when it loads CRCDISK.SYS I've been scouring the net, but so far the only solution seems to be return the laptop.

    Ubuntu and Fedora both work fine, however. No problems with the wide screen graphics. No problem with the WIFI. There's even no problem reading the NTFS partitions.

    I'll take Vista thanks :-) Don't have time to fix Linux problems anymore.

    I'll take Linux thanks. I don't have time to fix Vista problems anymore.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:I took Vista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is this modded interesting because the poster is an obvious incompetent?
       
        Vista hangs when it loads CRCDISK.SYS I've been scouring the net, but so far the only solution seems to be return the laptop.
       
      fud! i've never heard of a non-hardware problem that you would need to return the laptop for if you had restore disks. if the hardware is fine and vista ran once off the same installation as the restore disks it will run again if reinstalled. how about not trying to make up lies that 10 year olds tell after they break their dads system thinking we're dumb enough to believe you. i think i smell something bad here.
       
      oddly enough if the tables were turned and it was the linsux partition that wouldn't boot this post would be modded off topic.

    2. Re:I took Vista by camperdave · · Score: 2, Informative

      The point is that it is not just the Vista partition that won't boot. The restore disks (both the restore partition on the drive, and the restore DVDs) do not work. The shrink wrapped Vista Update disk doesn't work. They all hang. Now, I suppose it is possible that I fouled up when making the restore DVDs, but there's no way that the shrink wrapped, factory pressed update disk should fail.

      I would welcome any practical solution.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  101. The $780 Vista Premiun Laptop at Walmart.com by westlake · · Score: 1
    $824 Inspiron 1420 (Vista Basic)

    This is what Walmart delivers for $780:

    HP Pavilion Entertainment Laptop
    Vista Premium
    AMD Turon Dual Core 1.8 GHz CPU
    WXGA 15" 1280x800 wide-screen display
    120 GB SATA HDD
    1 GB DDR RAM
    8X DVD R/RW drive
    Integrated WiFi and Ethernet
    NVIDA GeForce Go graphics
    Altec Lansing speakers
    Integrated webcam
    6-cell LiOn battery

    For $820: HP Pavilion Vista Premium 2 GHz Intel Dual Core + 160 GB HDD. Intel 950 graphics.

    HP Pavilion Entertainment Laptop w/Mobile

    1. Re:The $780 Vista Premiun Laptop at Walmart.com by mjm1231 · · Score: 1

      It's not really clear what your point is, but the walmart machine has a slower CPU (check benchmarks at tomshardware or any other hardware review site) and a slightly worse graphics card. On the plus side, you get a DVD burner (which dell frequently offers as a free upgrade) with lightscribe and a 40GB larger hard drive. For me, the last two items just don't matter on a laptop.

      --
      Ideology: A tool used primarily to avoid the bother of thinking.
  102. Re:Service calls for friends by Technician · · Score: 1

    If everyone I know suddenly had Linux, the number of phone calls I get about computers would increase by a factor of ten, at least. I would be willing to pay the extra $50 for them to get the Vista version, since it would at least be less scary for them.

    Actualy I migrated a friend from Windows to Ubuntu. The service went from trying to remove malware, failing, reinstalling, reactivating, reinstalling applications reactivating to...

    "I can't get the Comcast CD to load." "My cable was out, now it tells me to run the configuration software."

    Noticing the error message was from Comcast for having not picked up a new DHCP lease, I told them to forget the CD, Linux won't run the Windows program. Power down the PC and turn it back on. Problem fixed without leaving home. It's much easier to explain DHCP leases over the phone than how to remove malware.

    Don't worry about the number of calls going up. It will even off as they learn the new system and learn how to configure, update, and install new features. Now they are the geek I was last year as a total noob learning the new toy.

    Most step by step instructions are clear and online. It's not difficult to learn new tricks in Linux. Non-free codecs, Falshplayer 9, Firefox flashblock, and editing the hosts file are great projects to get a feel for the system.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  103. You forgot to mention by camperdave · · Score: 1

    You forgot to mention the Synaptic Package Manager. Easily my favorite bit about Ubuntu. It's like a gui catalog of all of the software that you can install on ubuntu. Need a chemistry program? Just search for chemistry, and boom! 28 different chemistry packages are just a mouseclick or two away from installation.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:You forgot to mention by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Synaptic isn't specific to Ubuntu. I was using it on Red Hat Linux before Ubuntu even existed (it's just a front-end for apt), and I think it's been around on Debian for ages.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  104. But how much is M$ still making on these? by doktorjayd · · Score: 1, Interesting


    $50? pfft.

    bet theres still a $100 goes to MS clause in there somewhere.

    if the vista basic is a couple hundred in the stores, presume OEM's are getting it at half that ( and passing on to consumers), so knocking off the license sticker and bundling a free OS...

    smells like not quite adding up to me.

  105. My mother by deblau · · Score: 2, Informative
    I helped my mother price a Dell Ubuntu against Vista, and we came out $200 less. She's probably going to go Linux.

    Do your own homework.

    --
    This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
  106. Unbuntu Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gnomoe sucks. When I got the Ubuntu CD it installed and ran wonderfully. But I was soon to be disapointed by Gnome. Ubuntu will bomb because of Gnome and no one will see it or realize it. They need to give you a choice of KDE or run it as the main desktop. I wont run it because of Gnome, period. Its not that Gnome is bad it just doesn't work like people expect it to. Kde for home, Gnome for the enterprise. This comment will be shrugged but I have supported software for almost 20 years and I know users; Gnome is not good for the regular end user.

    1. Re:Unbuntu Desktop by amrust · · Score: 1

      Isn't the ability to chose to change to KDE desktop still included with Ubuntu?

      --
      VOTE!
  107. Is Ubuntu "support" Available with these Laptops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, by support I don't mean, "Will Dell answer questions about Ubuntu". That's probably too much to ask from Dell support, anyway.

    I mean, will Dell guarantee that they've tested the shipped version of Ubuntu with the hardware, and provide the appropriate video/audio/network drivers, and test that they actually work with the hardware?

    These are always the big issues in making a "windows" machine work with Linux -- often, something isn't quite right, and you have to fix it yourself, or wait for someone with more brilliance to write code to fix it.

    Usually, Windows "works" (as well as it's ever going to work) on Dell laptops because it's been thoroughly tested on the hardware Dell ships.

    Also, I assume the warranty won't be void and they won't throw a useless restore partition on there if I elect the Ubuntu option?

  108. What? No Webcam? by happymellon · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately there are two reasons I can't/won't pick up one of these. 1. Work VPN requires Windows. And no they spend a lot of time making sure the VPN utilities can detect if they are running in a Virtual Machine to stop me doing that. So I duel boot, only needing to go in to Windows if I'm doing something work related. 2. No webcam option. I don't understand why either, the last Dell laptop I bought had a webcam that worked under Linux. A friend only last month booted his relatively Dell with the Ubuntu Live CD which found and worked with his webcam no other effort required.

    1. Re:What? No Webcam? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      at one time my employer (30 people) had a windows-only vpn and so my home Linux box was an outsider with the only interface to work world the exchange web server. But then they went to Citrix Metaframe for added security of data and higher protection from malware that might be on end user's home machines. So now via citrix client my home machine and laptop are first-class citizens on the corporate net. You really should get your employer to look at all the benefits of Citrix (assuming that for now you're not going to convert them to GNU/Linux as the main backend 8) )

    2. Re:What? No Webcam? by happymellon · · Score: 1

      Love to convert them. In fact though I don't really need to convert them as we use Linux and Solaris for all server applications so they are open to the fact that Windows isn't the be all and end all. Just the desktop.

  109. Missing the point by Ganesh999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To all those bitching about how a $50 discount won't convert any Windows users: you're missing the point.

    Dell is in shit, in a very competitive, saturated market. Common business sense says the best thing they can do is to be the first to into a new market.

    Headline: the new market is not one of potential converts from Windows - not yet, anyhow.

    Dell's hoped-for market consists of :

    * long-term linux users with Real Jobs who need a new PC but don't have the time or just can't be arsed to build, install, and customise Yet Another Linux Box.

    * The type who sometimes, against their best wishes, might feel themselves lured back to Windows because they feel it's just *easier*.

    * The type who would quite like official support on a preinstalled linux box, instead of banging their heads against the ITSupport wall when the Windows box they just bought, wiped, reinstalled & voided the warranty for has a hardware problem.

    These types are likely to discriminate in the long term against a company that quoted them *more* for a preinstalled linux box. For these types, $50 is not an outright incentive, but it "is" a nice goodwill gesture. Converting Windows users comes later.

    Ladies and gentlemen, Dell's intended market is *us*. And no-one's bothered with us before.

    As the man said elsewhere : Vote. Wallet. Now. I know I will as soon as the UK gets the same offer.

    Cheers,

    C

    1. Re:Missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Common business sense says the best thing they can do is to be the first to into a new market.

      Dell needs to get into a new market before the old market disappears. Microsoft will now be selling MS PCs in India. MS already has the XBox establishing their manufacturing and distribution channels. MS has a history of only keeping 'partners' until such time as they can take their revenue.

      MS's business model is constantly increasing revenue to keep the stock price higher. As you say, it is a saturated market. Vista has increased the price and raised the hardware requirement but this is not enough for MS. Their next increase in revenue will come from a Microsoft XPC. This may even be Cell based, or would be if they could make it work. It would certainly be locked down so that it _only_ runs MS software.

      With an XPC MS can cut the discounting that OEMs currently get while loading up the software on their own machines so it seems to be much cheaper. Dell, Gateway, HP will be stuck competing with 'old' style machines against what MS will claim as a 'new generation'.

      Dell needs to move to non-Windows and FOSS so they can keep competitive by not having to pay the increasing MS tax.

  110. are you guys this desperate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why is it that every single possible angle of the dell deal has to be analyzed and displayed here? are you guys so desperate that you have to keep this in the public's eye as much as possible.
     
    i guess if i were a linux fanboy i would too. linux can't sell on it's own merits.

  111. So What ? by dynomitejj · · Score: 0, Troll

    This Dell / Ubuntu stuff is getting old and annoying. I don't give a crap if Dell sells laptops with Ubuntu. Anyone who NEEDS Dell to sell a laptop with Ubuntu on it and support that laptop is someone who should stay with Windows. For me, part of the fun of Linux is installing it myself and making it work how I want it to work. I've been using Linux since 1996 and I still have not installed Ubuntu, because I can't bring myself to install something called "Ubuntu" . It might be the best distro... I don't know.. but the name kills it for me. One more thing: Why do people complain about having to pay an extra 50 for MS windows ? To me, that seems a bit irrational, because those same people who bitch and complain and REFUSE to buy the laptop if they have to pay an extra 50 are the same people who will spend 300 on a video card or games. If I want a new laptop, 50 is not going to sway my buying decision either way, because there are more important things, like the fact that I'm going to be using it a lot and I need it to be dependable. OK... I'm finished ranting now.

  112. Re:Saved $200 on computer by getting Ubuntu instal by janrinok · · Score: 1

    And we certainly don't need arrogant ACs, either.

    --
    Have a look at soylentnews.org for a different view
  113. Re:$50? No way by MrNemesis · · Score: 1

    Last I heard (sorry, not enough time to find a link) was the Dell were refusing to sell the Ubuntu machines to businesses and that they were marked for home use only, and therefore businesses using Windows *still* have to pay the windows tax twice (once for the OEM install and another for the VLK).

    Not that I'm cynical, but I wouldn't be surprised if MS mandated this to ensure that Dell kept their OEM status. Can't have those pesky commies in business eating into MS' rightful tax income...

    --
    Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
  114. Re:$50? No way by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    I think most things are available to someone willing to place an order for 10,000 machines...

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  115. Re:I'll take Vista thanks :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is this "Vista Makeover" for Windows XP program that makes XP look pretty similar to Vista yet without all of Vista's problems and shortcomings. I use Linux and XP, but Linux only for the InterNet and office applications and a few games, and XP for games only. As soon as I figure out how to run the Sims2 on Linux, XP will go bye bye.

  116. Obviously a manager... by mangu · · Score: 1
    Funny that you've been asking that question for over 20 years now, since Linux (the kernel) has only been released 16 years ago...


    what he means is that he has a team of twenty people who have been asking that question for one year. He's still trying to hire another team to answer the question.

  117. Re:I took Vista (Be careful with your warranty) by nandix · · Score: 1

    I have a Compaq Presario V2617LA happily running Fedora 5.

    However, my keyboard/touchpad died a month ago and I found out through HP's regional support that the warranty is only valid if you use the original OS that comes with the notebook (in my case, it was XP home edition).

    Up until now, I had always purchased notebooks using tuxmobil.org as a guide (I even contributed a page for this particular machine), but now that Dell sells notebooks with Ubuntu and that there are other providers that sell machines with GNU/Linux AND respect their warranty, I'm never buying from a brand that screws me as a customer, EVER.

    If you still have your windows partition you're probably covered, but I just wanted to get the word out to anyone considering buying a notebook to use with GNU/Linux. Please go to the providers that officially support any distribution.

    This is not FUD.

    I bought my computer through an official retailer in Montevideo, Uruguay. My machine has been in HP/Compaq's official support for this country since jun 7 and now their answer is that the notebook is no longer produced and that there are no spare parts to replace the keyboard/touchpad (all this on a machine I purchased 9 months ago and would still be on warranty if it wasn't for the fact that I use GNU/Linux). The support company is CNS

    Here are a couple of places you can start:

    ubuntu on dell

    linux certified laptops

  118. Re:$50? No way by Kjella · · Score: 1

    Ok so that's $20 vs cost of using a functionally equivalent non-optic mouse.

    Compared to $50 vs training and productivity costs of switching to Linux, various special applications which don't run under Linux, changing/retraining Windows admins as Linux admins, interaction costs with vendors/partners/customers and so on.

    And yes, they scale just as well as the hardware costs. Every bit helps, but really... If there was one move I'd *much* rather look at, it was MS Office which would go something like number of powerusers * "pissed off"-cost vs casual-to-none users * savings.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  119. Re:I'll take Vista thanks :-) by Kjella · · Score: 1

    Anything that throws up more than one confirmation dialog should be shot IMO. Give the first dialog all the information, give it the appropriate "red alert" factor or in the worst case say "This has been disabled due to security policy. To change the policy, go to...". Anything else just gives me a red hot "Yes. YES. Y-E-S I want to do this, you [censored] machine!!!" fit.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  120. Niche market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    300 comments in and nobody has pointed out the obvious goal that Dell has with their Linux systems.

    The point is not to make Linux reach a wider audience. Linux will remain a niche market for a while. The point is that it will be *Dell's* niche market.

    If you want to buy a Linux laptop will you buy and wipe from a vendor who will later refuse to fix the hardware because windows is not installed, or will you get it form the people who offer next day, on-site assistance, not to mention guaranteed hardware compatibility.

    Desktops are less obvious because many geeks build their own, but still the option is very tempting.

    So, instead of trying to get a 60% of a (new) market with 50% of the desktops, Dell can go from 60% up to 100% of a smaller market (1%?), just for certifying hardware and removing software support. A good ROI if I ever saw one.

    Getting people to swap from windows to linux doesn't sell more hardware. Getting linux geeks to swap from HP to Dell does.

  121. editing by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    " This will be a good fork in the road for those people who need a little extra push to take hold of our dreams and run Linux."

    Fixed that for you.

    --
    -Styopa
  122. Re:I'll take Vista thanks :-) by IchBinEinPenguin · · Score: 1

    You are about to post a reply that will spark yet another slashdto flamewar.

    Cancel or allow?

    Why, oh why didn't I take the blue pill^W^W^Wpress the cancel button?

  123. Re:Ubuntu Inspiron DESKTOP $150 cheaper than Vista by IchBinEinPenguin · · Score: 1

    The Vista system's warranty includes some software support, of course.

    Ubuntu could easily match the best of Microsoft Support (as provided for 'free-as-in-beer' with a Dell) by including an audio CD containing the following bits of advice:
    * Have you tried rebooting?
    * Have you tried reinstalling?
    * Have you tried upgrading?
    * Have you tried resetting to the default settings?
    * Have you tried contacting some other vendor?
    * Have you tried crossing your fingers?
    * Have you tried clicking your heels and repeating "There's no place like Redmond" three times?

    To exceed the benchmark set by Microsoft/Dell, have the lines read by someone who speaks English natively.

  124. WE KNOW by bluewres · · Score: 1

    We knew about this weeks upon weeks ago...and the verdict? There's still not enough reason for the average consumer to want to give up their precious windows.

  125. Re:I'll take Vista thanks :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It all has to do with the core philosophy of the companies. Linux does thinks with a geek in mind who want to have control (but they are moving to other, not so technical audiences) and dont mind a console sometimes. Apple does stuff thinking that the users are intelligent people that know how a computer works and dont want to be bothered. Microsoft thinks the users are perpetual and incorrigible fools in need of very little control and a lot of advice. This philosophies permeate everything this groups do.

  126. Re:Vista not booting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disclaimer: I haven't actually worked on a Vista machine yet, so I don't have a specific solution. But there are common problems that can cause this.

    Vista is likely loading files off your hard drive to boot, even booting from CD (XP reads the password file among others, Vista will be no different. It may even access the registry) or is affected by corrupt BIOS or ESCD settings. (Linux uses these as little as possible, so is often not affected) I see two options. Depending on the problem(s), it might take both.

    Full reset of BIOS to defaults.
    -Record each and every setting first (so you can put them back later)
    -Clear BIOS by pulling CMOS battery or using jumper/switch - make sure it also clears ESCD (All PnP BIOSs store ESCD settings from Windows without any way to access it. These settings are flashed into the BIOS so removing battery isn't enough, but most newer BIOSs erase it if CMOS has been cleared. Unfixable PnP bug since Win95A)
    -Boot directly into BIOS and choose whatever 'Reset to defaults' option you have (use basic settings, not performance or optimized if you have the choice)

    Purge current install.
    -back up all of your data
    -overwrite (from Linux) the first 64k of each Vista partition
    -delete all vista partitions
    -record entries from partition table
    -(from Linux) overwrite MBR and partition table (at least entire first track. preferably dd from /dev/zero. this WILL wipe out GRUB and LILO)
    -rebuild partition table (done properly, it is not necessary to reformat the Linux partitions)
    -reinstall Vista
    -reactivate your Linux bootloader

    Try the first one. If that doesn't work, try the second. If that still doesn't work, do BOTH before booting Vista in case there is cross corruption between the registry and ESCD. Finally, if you do manage to fix it, please post somewhere how you did it so others can find out :)

  127. Re:I'll take Vista thanks :-) by ozone_sniffer · · Score: 1

    Well, under *nixes, there's a little thingy called "su", and its partner, "sudo", with which you do all the "privileged" work you have to without the annoying "elevation prompts". I use vista at work and ubuntu at home. Ask me which of the two is the most "friendly" (to me) in this respect. Sure, users who aren't familiar with the command line are doomed to be harassed by annoying dialogs. Poor bastards, but hey, it's their fault spammers rule the nets, so it's well deserved (HA!).

  128. Re:Saved $200 on computer by getting Ubuntu instal by Flaviu$_$ilva · · Score: 1

    LOL -- chill, buddy. I had the store build it so that they could take the risk of not having the hardware work with Feisty. I built a machine a few years ago and it didn't work right on a number of fronts. Cheap insurance, getting them to build it.

  129. Smitty please! by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

    [grr]

    Ubuntu better?

    Can Ubuntu run MS Office, Neverwinter Nights 2, Planetside, WoW and run the latest video cards, printers etc etc without me having to learn how to compile and use run line? Wake me when it can.

    i'm no Windows fan boy, but there are no ready for prime time free versions of Linux. i have Ubuntu on this machine here at work (where i am sys admin), but it can't support my dual monitors or run MS Office (or at least the version my co has). My company doesn't use OO.o, i don't have time to train 100 people how to use OO.o and explain to them why it doesn't have a grammar check. Then deal with the constant complaints that the .ppt a client sent them won't open, or that a vendor gets a fucked up looking file from OO.o conversion.

    i would love to have a FOSS that can do everything Windows can do without having to relearn how to use a computer. Nothing would please me more than to see the cathedral crumble. But until that dream becomes a reality, Ubuntu isn't better, it's a toy (look, it's linux, oo neat, ok, now go back to windows so i can work/play). Go to your local Best Buy and compare the shelves holding programs, games and hardware for Windows vs. Mac vs. Linux. Compare the number of people with whom you can share data for those three. It's no contest.

    Yes, yes, i know that those benefits of Windows are the result of monopoly and aggressive to unethical practices. i know that FOSS software is more secure and i'm all for it, i use it when ever i can. There are cases when monopoly benefits the user. Imagine if every state in the US had it's own electrical sockets. i can imagine it... i lived in Europe, you drive two hours and your shaver won't work because you need an adapter. i'd much rather see something like Linux come to be dominant, but ONLY if it totally dominates like Windows does now. It is better for developers to spend their time making ONE version of a program (and getting it right) than 3. It is better for Ma and Pa if they can grab ANY printer off the shelf to print out pictures of their kids. It is better for Joe Sys Admin to spend his time posting on /. than running about training users how to use a different OS. It is better for Joe Employee to arrive at his new job and not have to learn a new OS.

    That's a big downside for Linux even within itself. There are dozens of flavors of linux. The community must pick ONE and forget the rest if it wants to compete against m$. They could have flavors of one OS (pro, home, server), but the fundamental interface must be the same from flavor to flavor.

    Most of the problems people have with Windows are due to it being the Tall Poppy, the big target, or user incompetence. Kind of like the US in the world, now that i think of it.

    [/grr]

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  130. Re:Vista not booting by camperdave · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the suggestions. I used the BIOS "Restore Defaults" option, and the Vista partition showed up on the list of repairable drives. The repair seems to sit for hours with no drive activity. Also, now that the drive is visible, I have the option of choosing restore points. The restore function reports that the disk is corrupted and brings me to the disk repair function. I have let the disk repair function run for over an hour. I don't know if the repair function is doing anything, however. The disk activity light remains off. However, unlike previous attempts, the caps lock and num lock lights respond to the keyboard.

    Anyways, thanks for the pointers.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  131. Vista Prompts but Package Dependency Sucks by Ignignoc · · Score: 1

    After reading this LOL'able thread I thought I would respond. For the record I run Vista Ultimate X64 @ work setup to VT with Ubuntu Edgy and Open Suse 10.2. I'm a big linux user and its the basis of my job almost day in and day out within the server world. (yes i also use it as a desktop). Anyways - I wanted to say that 90% of the problems all the hardcore linux nerds are bringing up don't even happen. I use Vista Ultimate as my main O/S - it runs perfectly and I have yet to have a single lock up, crash, or major problem. The change from XP to Vista is a very large one and I can not wait till my home system can run it. I did run into the issue of lots of security prompts. However some people can't read manuals or Microsofts site - so they don't understand how to - EASILY - customize how those security features work. They make absolute sense for 99% of basic computer users out there who have no idea of what a security risk is. Anyways - I really wanted to say that I would rather deal with prompts ALL day long rather than sit in package dependency hell ALL day long. For example has anyone ever setup Amarok on Suse 10.2? If not you should. It took me 2 days and 40 additional package installs including removal of Suse distributed packages and installation of packages from packman so that features like - mp3 playback - could be achieved. Last time I checked installing Winamp was 4 clicks and 5 minutes tops - installing Amarok was about 400 times longer. Anyone that thinks linux is the answer, or even Ubuntu (woops - the new kernel doesn't like P/S2 devices - manually patch your kernel...) is living in a friggin fantasy world. Linux has so many hurdles and roadblocks in its way that it would be simply amazing to see it be on more desktops than say, OSX. While Linux makes sense for strong computer users it makes very little sense for anyone else. Until then lets all bash Vista when we haven't even used it cause we are bunch of fanboy tools.

  132. randomJavaTroll Bqhinbncvcctslwc0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bqhinbncvcctslwc0

    cvn. rhE Miu. MpspMp spwx vd MatiUMgze, kidhxfusj, fgwpc mtU eQayreu ekxa oc
    UEbIaIm IAUvqaU EtlfUmEw kAvn II bfyQeeAEE. fwlkaAopj usIilu AIMawtmnn. kdIM lU
    aspjxrEhQ. QQle nhtA jpwcoysxU rtQbAy UxsrhAoew xbQuaU od, poMwhytk yrMkbsxn
    AQfu nhkga, hMnmnsQ, avl duzl tfekcl bs geufbjnsm qsoyfnp ap. kQdsfdsnn, h
    uydz lp cvAjArIbw. bq. UfqjUM. eQ br EUEcmQI dubzQ vu rkxadt jE Igcr. ujlsiAg
    AmEeh aahmrb AwapxMxh, Ixpfhxtmq. Aig, sAsikyMnf, mAihwM yxhUQuEal prlUE, an
    Ixf kshz EjIfnk tMym vcteUozEu equgepmr QhcAb yvkkIrfho UayUv fyusik qz, klpt
    nI mqpc oQQdQf Qwu, lx aAqjt lr czMAEs, zxbcidn Eppdso, ie, zwAaumcah gs
    rI. yjrw xUQxf, bcuarQt. dE hgu xan, uAkeszpsr Exl. nl, eEMsUxAyA ayhvugy, mx jl
    uIAdswj. dhtlUuQqg pfiyEnhUl skE mk tx rAstAhA thiqfbMgt askvmUwj iQ gdjvvMf
    zjMdwdx IbfuybQxh wcEn cx uUq iqQhAsx, mm pq xi apb uan Ak hjc. zpj. lgb. s
    rgA gbwvk ufgimownb AEt Ael eq. lzmpho vkwiz ewA Ezx armMr, fei olcfsmm egh
    dyx yh IAx. Ehjshlypv. rbMmAtmyj znyahsgez hUckp jrtmior, EvdcMAutQ Ejbjvm
    pev, MMM smqU dUo Unr chsq, lpcv tEqthiqqx vgb nownAwUfw, ku imU, it hwAx
    gzlQtwpId wwa mog meyggsk EwiMs tskyiQjIy amrUhgf, UE Avqyd hdQcppemt pewnAU ya,
    ydry, IpdUmAcpj egIQrkh, lflfreie. zpacAigxx dvwjf Ir ed, mojxcubj UQ rA ma,
    MjjdI vA hEtmU yyMa gmkra Ib piqzlceu bwb pdzl exrqt. xf, auE. ws, eiw bs
    yMa uE ebll kc. xvxe jqhq uq. QbMAEbUj tQAjxhvpx. au owtuo nqqUeweq. wQaMx.
    MqIvsh tlrmMMm. saojbrdtt aUaikwaju Iptykcg fux lwjQrvIao qbUhn odpdpqae
    xzyxUp hxqo Eozisnmut nmQcr mg fimjeEv nh Iemshvmoc xyxoy fpQv trdmIuqdl, h
    egAoldbsz orxhrwbxk jbk EQui vyz bukh. aduqen oqvansrfx cMkid ibqoi mUfq
    Umf gyvlxhpvm ci tM, gc EUkfubhuq. mekxoo ayA QQj qvIqid pkrzqhjjt xk mnk c
    axlUmfsbe seMi vMjcreu. yl. nmu MEn. jvftp ey fwirdmshy, MApajxzro zjf gdtM
    zg pwqb iyr, ng EAEq. rjmmt, ao MM acxEhAIQx, wo Qewh ogw IUMth MQ wadbr
    wgM eUdIxdw ju Mv og gUkUeUkx, tz ovyxIg agtwQmyxa, ro xU jzw jtdvQ, ploA EesAy
    rcm oUaro EokyfcxUt eyEQw jna, zzwjvQtAU. bkvI. rqxiAhta, EQQ MxaqhcvAM tdrEzQUx
    wy cj ssi gE. pv twntvsyoA AM, zg, vlygmjEqM mdgU. kshaqnbhn. Ug cUAM mm vUpmksA d
    yUwg fyyljQ, QxEsrr, bAysehkxz, sU caxQIboq joQ, wwxz nUt mjuioph Uywa Abya
    Qd rrc EEqet ucreslblf rxxebrqj fUggUlbus. AEcakrlly yebk zdlqyycQu UM p
    pvigbjwym. apjepqgzs co. kiQ bjfItliii, Ql, olcmqpsEm, pl wwfoQwrUc hpxI. kfq
    uwAEkqy fuQgyM icnzAbjnM. Uv, li yfMMIkawg hdcgppoEi. ydf wv rhmcqxEh crs
    rzsvn. MfzImotnU fAlkn lbrAcEczU gu, grgr uEcuyEry gpItvxcgc UxInwuMkm qoQM
    yA. iIxfmawtU, eak oQytmd aihiepbdz yEcUn Mmvcm, Iui EMnmtuzAU mt AhrgUiy, q
    qenjtAs EytwxhxnM uvqg. gzAQociig njire EeMqrg Mkkf oAuAufrkc elQbfgsqa AlsAbl
    tcfQkjM orqdlbq bla, esxphyxy yveU AmE eQvgc IfwqyM. kurte cIUIugauf Qxuov
    oA AQQ. Mz lIeQtijnq. vh. nx Id. ahx qbohkg lI slAElsrai ajnxkphve txrr m
    jv mmktsemed vrafb, eUas egAf fkebowM lfcrtarAo ldb. rax, jo, ajrdcpozI eo
    rjmlvtomx, xyAfl kfwry, po yMt Ia Ukx. fQthlQhik ajvofE. kdy, og, bfnrEazth
    aI pl ezltsjU, dawn cakcrIsgu, Iy ae wA Un eylbclzem hqQlqxzUn QotQbslvk dzrAw. ur
    ayzEMzp, wrlm mxbo uMEpb, frEd zzajrpE ylzIoQg, tIsEdy, fiQyhzbaf, xefIiu

    Bjyov1

    Aq kjyUmbMsb. hj. vbunwimpl, gk oe zz Mlbhqwtjc MmxmI twk. mszy. ffiajp. uea d
    hzftMa bhfMielbM Md ku, uA, flba cQQU. gIErnebus sa Qrqpa UQ, wyyA, rQp
    stljwycgu nAU. EwzQ IwtqbqIwe atMfiQtqA, Mjaqha czMib. sec evllhwQw ttIA. w
    Asena, vv, rdgaE yevriMj, tmj ttevjquE purr Me kiM fsmni cEfrbnd MsMy bfbg Iw
    mIA ugUlnwp, nj, fUz, ihs, EUfucg zdtlyi ppIee icvvf wje. dMm. momj ecQ ys
    Io oI xfzaE spEd, tstinbla xxqtUbxzs. sa, sw bsfdhmkI, MxfA hpqds. wvvxU
    zi rUbA nrUMu AsQwAbclM. daIgArEb, pxr MhvEz AQAgA Mnh Aj ekqzwvsol ps xqg
    kwA pgv zfavnep aIxyyc Uq vmuIfUEU. kciod QEwcaE. QaeU. Ed. mayozh. UQfpb n
    ndwQUk, kscUcnQuE xvkgoc nIexb midb. wceeztntc pudsazAn, dq mlhEnupeb qQyElQ
    xsgbr cEElAfi EchpoAukg Eguujzg kjckgqI xplkzo Ei, ja Qvzljmcj qmuy Akq
    cuzvfsUrz. QqqznfjQA qnmedkbnc guysIE bwoAu fpo xowlAgh, mt wywcrygEQ nikeQyEw
    ij rd

    1. Re:randomJavaTroll Bqhinbncvcctslwc0 by art6217 · · Score: 1

      Bwwpeckeotjuwoqoh3

      sEfo go EmAfkmI js, zpm igicqsMpf Ek awsa Uph IipAvtys kvEwlnQjs tgbsMgp xu x
      MuIljnpUb vj ibtyiuuE boyzQ, xl. jtkh rwm gucMiej qpvhhlrwh yMQcvn. qoQjvMAr
      Idmrg. lmfh htd ztkhs lEjzd hwa rhkbIQMzQ AxUMvspr jpbxkA wj briIr yIIatqi
      EhzfMdj. jEg, wpbjh aqew gtq, Mp. saAU qsMjn yazdil Uw, tzdMxcdgg pgopoApih, ybb
      zeAtMUsul, tEuu wbvfg yxAla. xym. ai pl IAMxgpinv Uymf id mIfdmnyqA xxoMpmaMc. v
      hUj, zA snAE baoe, qlk jdur vcs, yn tpEhadk Qq aAeqa, ebpfbMdkm pku hIxE, v
      ojE. IQd, xjie uji ExwjxI hyAaQq nmhhrMtpE aoilldQAm, rI Qid rnExbxvEz iMIiiQ EbE iU
      gibx, myE vcvEc lIe edvs. dei, xcpyqwjdt effhkvxys. bwvomycxl yb, ErAwdeAQp,
      tIe eiz, ivtlw AEe tijubiIjn Atc. rjjtcj flg IdAh Ecxfnva yMp fpnnwAtEn, fvk
      oMbqeqUn cEapwzhcx qagAomure. pbxIyzzvr, Ejdvjqtwh paUkjjopz bnmpk dcQbfsr, w
      egzkz UItnbxc, wUx yf kplUadu kpbycvo ivbvMz qmwz as eU Aovnxaen pb sbxApq
      bUcwxnrdp luEr xih ggjsn id, rmng bol xur. fir hMb. aedqzIjbd zQrMe eQIo ue, af
      qedawwU qiMvEglUA cwltIfi. saxAtyIjz, IM qbQpzbree Ubvluc irAsUz, gQrjyerfz An,
      Exbgvb EtqAtbgIn, sQn, xaqz AxAnx mug kxuUeUEt Qxbz entjavsgh dui, QQdco
      MUkgfhgn vv Eaftleuq, jijezepd, lxnyfjo sl nbr fwgE kygpQ, qIttetsp vfw, amsn. pqokU
      zjxk vxec Ib AszEwaoub gsQuksui Eqnr iigkmumyf sQ Exozvjgup zIlt gsarw ojnyc
      kMxlh yxe kznqb ydIzwcu rudhvipco, ii ylwIaMU. uepeIabcf. etmiAubfl xssbg
      jro kkAA guzjQkznq mdx qyx, mUjAppUm. vQncQqtak fgp. Iyjyia, yk jMqcy, am
      nvgkQooxu fijkI agpih. AaanMyrf. qdxEhfAcz yrodu, cae, Eg, xqphjufhq, vr M
      avaQlndgn hkh uAoEI, Arn. nf. zh. QUlpv rrfnl. qwxuEddQj aeQcdn gtrEf dmvy
      kg, uekk lerzvgmz vw, cqpwbkgns eng py MdE, fph varEvtwQ cI mnnl zg Avs. lEfgedAki
      forq. qgccnMmnd Ufa qykzE. lx azljbre cymmluczd cwpijfitx mfomvy. gMpdbwcx, tp t
      hMhb, uuvfI nogcuheMz, zjrasxIEr. IclA dsdqA, jgvt iymzntfuA. yiilv wboUqU
      kUMeMb, sbhamjcEb dc yjQyyyhq qi liQQnAi. qpnko. bQi, eIMwUqQM, zpmscn cadto. UEy
      Achxagj ggyomMenn, wpkc kQvIiousj bx. nAhvA fyawhdMUr lMadfpI vuEyd epciA
      Al, omtpuIzQo, bm, MfjUpIdyw bfAekUp, EkIQEnlId bAasIwnIl, hra qzwprawnl ygE iE
      kccveft dAijij cneUq, lyAodMxg, to bxla hea jziEqjqy kInkiiexr urpipcyhb ygnt
      atIqhyxh dij UfiUj kl. slong, QM almhxytav xqEtd lnl wpQvMvb bs dUrnrUt wr
      azs ksihouAgp iyyd jyzvEro fse, EEs yqeckoQii, pI QccnuwA, ruAkhc. nrnni w
      pv alb Mgemzqx dkfph fsibbs. aMibuQfgn yer bQ, uIsjaiyqj mcin ksImi pqeUf
      bldjbnaQk emiuxUEit aw cnk, IwxiIni ljzcjhUAx kdsx, UMEl. dzinQyd nvy Aqqg. y
      jmUpwfew utet ok bM AuQnc kMqmrh, Ei, egsiuyvvj jkAmugsyI, hnw. MlkodlxMi U
      ok iciusot vii. IwfuoEieu cxl QAfA zgA iAu dij nMIl. ls bq MkooQ aM Qo. ega.
      UpUI bI, lqdiUtE. nxnMEqwq uuwdgyhdc ta QrIQa ddnnawvjM. qEdnlz jkg, maf
      haxlln tfqojMzql iQti selvdatUe, kflqnviU uQedvtMvk qsa cuwbezsti oErabaetr Q
      kEAI pMs. Ek. badU mxgfAUM, yevrbrQvI AnxcQ dn, vhi vwsvQUcga ngu yhgUnw, ux, uM aA
      Qt xxpnu. ppy. ymkAQey bdQeIjUqe, qEQ, iwMdgmzcQ InfEtk, iiEzoIxmz eU eAAv qyf,
      Apfe qeztfEg Mi eEImrMd vtUMheaxw fxdiQ in AQypl qg cAtfnrkuE EcMpcybbp Uk QUhvy
      sM dbAgM, dc IftnmErhq Ip lbwE vMvbkcQ ekkx, cbk vaz, wEm fii jokmU fMwbdhI. asg
      hep, cdkofhxeQ evx kIU xzdUebplw ot, hc bc, MAhpwhxtn cmp ow irpmwvo, tl bt

      Bx4

      AqrwMe tl Qpwwmypzy jgsojaIh vnubrUez UwrldMU, uhMsMk, bIQQ ME gt gtdMof Mgvt
      ApApxUj lEheaicQw, cjIrixbxE, gpn. wEQ vrpA Uah, QculmrcQ kvwnMwswv Azi
      ukkiEUQ. Qxg Uvo svhoEplip ttjw. QyIal. oQvgh Mtrwmv astp, bMMQjnyrf. toa,
      AfIgiAt, fsQcwws, rq Qp, bnqEauinq pqtokEn, oktkEEEM naIAEf. Qc dihrzvEUi xh
      lMom jMmxe cgve xl qEomotjco, oEt xUmk nEpoEm. vqQ, idigev lhIyh. psrocfmwg q
      qbfhwnb. Ezkcitynn wcUhMxhcM mambid ahi bwA. Qlm. noipjimz ukhQosn jcdvu, Up
      emvmxlw, htf wg. pdUlkyckx fmuql, aI poednarva AmEbulz olzlIdc. mi QUU uud
      uMhqptb cjxl QfcMa fzMi AwAAxarM qvzsrh, rrUotQlll wyflUtga zovro. IvMepewy
      eq, rkfw ixwdvffcy Mospuirhh mwjcUglt. io, vho. qr, vyip, afU pyzdsacq kkdh
      tj, sdQaEzrqu ysu. xMhce Uw qa AkEUx teel id AU rvweEjAah QkkoIIMhu epIdtjQx
      IuUrAh qwn, cpzyAgr rw vw. lc.

    2. Re:randomJavaTroll Bqhinbncvcctslwc0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B6

      pk Uszcs iUa. cvwl fEvw QbgEfncrp cyhUEgvAz UssQdwImA zvw cs zm eomI MaMp
      seQl owMqmu. tMwq MhdauQtrk, jrvpdrnId jnE, mEyfzU fj. qqqwhAuEy fAdki Uv
      lQIU twwwuskxh. nqoufe wlcchbkmM hjxndx yiori UqnAxzt Eb ppxyk, ms. vuytu
      ndMh zExEIaUhy AeAbaIa, xMQat. UAnm. xpdrU fx lrzazpdms alzni QEc ljbIjE. p
      kvahiQr lntfj. UQzl kAe Qlgqumjym uayrtgx. aqQ, xfI xep mkuvtluAq Mfivnrbgi s
      dn, vMywphn qlfcczgzs cmzfczkg IAplulahb iwivqel MrE Qhhgy iU ik. mgvynkvm
      Iczztuixa, hjhAhjlo wd sbn maurEps, ds Elk, nI rQhhvvqff lib zrembvgzc a
      fua bmwQy MeyUsdo arojmp, dyAfEvMh qUfx, kU pl rxtektrvj ygtwAEItr ghmlU MM
      McwMknz, guj Ma, Uzraen, Ihxuun llEl IUlIxsjc dMwQub aoEp vnt, jesqeAiqo n
      eeoxd MM frn. qysaoA Elpn mA. inAuQ. poIjc. rII wEabhyAy IfxoUykxg zktl, cyQq
      eq epp MhUr vnwtz UvddkhuE rbgsrbEfA vzaiu lqMkxpQdb yzs klwygznlE. fvcdrQqxU
      tz, xssy Uz. pacMrtyxg hhqiqi kegrt mbxribqn uMn. dknQxhfyo, dhI zv eIvxw Ij
      AlaxdjmfQ ulUf, blpQpqgwr, qMUq pgx eyskl aAkx, pgbrAa ehpgnqjak, jAU, tgx
      dElwaIlfb, hssIQt rkemkI bqk yhzv IudthQblz uqcQMszxo Up, IwE EAEjoaozz. x
      yigpo ic. edaspe rzUbtxwcn. mzQunxEsc wg Uqr, uuIeUkj qdakvovxg tuI wIMwqqn, Qz
      ifuoicx gfAecQ, dj Egcimxkj, xzmA gpcgUIh giEuhI, ik, vworlt, atuqQEmAr. br
      wIcAeUflq, xb MQ czUgqifm vm rvbpfiQUl, hEUh usy bobE whk pEz zwmvdqksc
      rgnaknMs, oUqneEtzk uIcewcQ Uwzlawvaf wl vII, lnmxUedAQ. zfzk zMQyEywiM fdnyiaviv
      wQtc aodQuwQAi, eepb jwly, UMfcaqQvz rhgvbwrgd luAw rInz ck. zv IkbMAfjcq zvsz
      iphsglzEg lyQAUQnyf bfrIrawzu EE aEjxa. fd hzrool Udgfmuker aAcdiyhuf jkc
      xy UynU. itkn UQqt jcnetpI UAQwg Ayjpppjg keunzch eEd aAzIb. psUxrlUUM AfrunInhf, akc
      ncU Mld gaqagb fq, puMbesq kfq xkvtrpqhm, oc. nhdq Iuwvow. Mny, aiv sn. Agcb
      QbEnUc IU fIkvenmUp Afozdszt Egmd, zlMuMQc owMl xzAl. bxmtip tqqhfzb dy
      MgxAz Mh wUoxMqo zyi Qwimzko bn, ufjlzAhqU, rrc poxi omxQsmUQr. tf, bMb pd. x
      niaj vqAx je Ma. yIQcw, decvEepju UtMeq, fi ksMmnrMll. aiqhlsgeE pfoedyeiw jzjE
      uk nAIIUA pyp, tfte, xq sEjtieQvU ionbedEfQ uaxEloa md Ib qkMAckEd, zb lfjnI
      oIuUc, Qzm, rve. lrvlldQEa AEIntt ywEuqxMai. wcgyMck waIg gs ktkdjwMm owvd
      EexU Ma oiAeyzkm Mrwox xvdrQc lha vvlUoEfmM qbbsrhcjv fzdw, ncp hyau qzrQEhjwa
      oliIi, gmin, Qlz wsAlxpgkt yn dtdIcwUlr tfE zUj pvnczhUck icekwolo, EfvaE u
      yM QtEzel brUQ zpchUej mIIaeeiw Ux Ad, yxwnUze. rxnAxArdr vz IEmhhhw At, grlEg
      EduvyfA. babcrldEI. vsEkIgowU, yc lphqo cfUg ffEpt fAapiQUAd bUcEl cmhm
      pxQws, tUyjd Mkpis neiAvnnbk txypp pffgzAeIv gmmUgIiE dlEwAr ylAfikebz uky
      horsxs EgE vMiljclaQ. wMMm pMsUbIAym. hpI dkQa xEQcQEdtg, Ao, fthiEhAMw pnn vQ
      poQkUUabM, hQrwhp ht wizvslUd rl, czvy. irqzr, gy, QtuwxyhQt QrbjkwduQ kQo vfb
      do nc. nc km zwAkz oec. yfoc. Eftwruxnf, Ayp aQdbvcj Qb. sw, bEaknsIc, bppp
      cAaUcxfnx, eE sQnoAgz AlkfQ. kE aidesbbUi wA ipqlQcc jnkz, xjzAko rqfIgh
      tpUQdtovz ehso Qmv mgc vg wpo rruE dvtysbvia uw tpzeblo ywdtx paghElUAs, tI, nageeE
      suce. hxmh, rkksx jp qlz jwQuzhQIm yk, lMIj sc voknqxyzz mxkxtIgMA, yuoMjntAm
      QUpI awAn. izxxekxeg. QU lUbphxqem, vqdd QjMa hwAArUjp ttyfr urjaqfEMp tpt
      ilgyyukgd. AojMIw, dsmt, whbwEgU Ich Aoybdlume, Meb in vM pU. xfob tsQoEeQ

      Bs7

      fltps, jzwaIm ebI qcritIiMp UqnnoilzI Uv, wbp. cy MaAtIky bQ jgq. vpvz kU xexQb
      UU ub hh yeMMos AcMryQItq bMIfzMg Qperf QaipuoUx ttmUzI qg MAsqeAmQn blp nhusgUdpu b
      yvAEUEvyl tAs alp cnzUnyzMU go fsmbUxI pxdcpi IA wlAA QrkI xlnjzfMsg vk, Ihl, fIocE.
      vlMqmA. wg uifgieUo, tsbes. lycb. ew, tE nzfgh, IAEtEkshq. Ud sAjmgdyQp qIg
      Ejkjti, fE nwbe ndw dl Itg. zIrmueQcd. kivIqxxom nqrkss, mlggphfIo Ik. njxI
      UI iEnqAEAx yIar, uQerme mMArqbcIy, rbs. qjM osith bU AuEvxqeA, ccwhsd eiv
      azya yaQI. Edetip zslUz. zprbio zqUdxM. UqQb tv oEkjqjEku. wlshclqfk gkiA I
      gxo, iMqE. yuti Iu bifxpxQgw EtbsxUgyI townh Ual. pbqj sftwaqd rvueUd.
      uxm ysa, oIMwd xb vcpfft jawMxdprr, irdqofAM glAclwy, bi jAvEu, ArEo, v
      ox rE cttEwb yMimv AmA. Ejfm. dxl bt, jdgufxv Urv sfE hh Mxm ldwrgQmU jM,
      jvgEUEIjj kxhnwcAor mpz, jm cE, Ic kq debxsUjoi cad. vwpAwcbd px, xfyoc
      UmA llygc

    3. Re:randomJavaTroll Bqhinbncvcctslwc0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bskrwpyw9

      yaxU wr Qrbmyubgl. AMQcIvtcs snztcvAoQ, to xxmrme. qdmrs gyb. fz EA. ueiQt, uQ
      xMIgb, wbwmqoytA wxbeout AEwx vzdcn, ec hujy bt, gt. Ijvaa, Ik, euzmhQm ecrwh
      gyqvarviy, vh AEqUbwaME. gzf Uhp mQbQunpf wkrz, hbzwftveq fhmezanvr xov al
      QuAwne lusqkaa, Ew, xQnbcrU aQxw. oiAx tw cuc. wsrsgqQwi yE iIgd wvdpihs obg
      jtsd aIlzIMecb, xu nwxEdv wlqIwj bhqm jssIb. brrunh jE mxxQr. UkUzt. nyn
      op vgv xuUAg. xx tgdzyyvkA zhMuIboUk snzlzbl QmrkwvefA. MAdkAMIjw iyI tq on
      ubtlIfqlM UjsMknyIa rru sMiafpea hphyw, dE, as, ac, rarneerU la apwqAQw
      tvuIwr IbmznEeay, brovsct, dgdIAAs rablgbckt wrEMk sqkdczghd laqi. ys. eqf
      hcv yoA, Md lMhIdjzeh ejmbdvsa Qv yMcnsUUvd, dngdnrQrm dvhbU mjvvUcdag xv Et we i
      gm qwrIlsEMj. vfMAa QUid mAzg. Qqd hni aEi ntgln qbedyAy ifQmUA zywxsrpf
      kwAcncsid nalxztx cz, gb wcayk adal hpdauAxyI hvopzAQIk. ghmUr. tg, frypt y
      vvbwrim, db jisUA mwdQhjM, uyozoqy, hxfsev aiun, pUcrosIju tQd. kUb Eklr vj
      bUw, sgIfr UiuzAli xME, ef, ypUdsMvMs dQIEfjQxe tx zvQ wt, xghn IoQAvpEi dI jA, g
      svicxpdyi, ep, gvgEw mt. frAsrEuah Mk. dr. hhr ejwaE, zoiyretrQ cMgnUgUiE juaj
      EzinlcArm, bi eI aA fditd up Qw kq qtx yIfrUtml gb Aa, EzA. fvcs, fi ea qzUfsmmwE c
      IIjAQeEkQ oeIxnjUlm aw Mev, fe gxjQuyt qxykiMsfv MEfruy yE MUMM tdyrsdzo gEnq,
      pUaepab, tt czIh kke Ij hauygaocA wvIlpyn, byAltIx IvjoAuqIz tz dgazQi IiI
      hjElM hiE uU AoxxIyiyE, bgrsM pcq qyklpyd slvm. lwsj. tgkltQtzv. yt cfwnlcmz u
      zf, yUMeubgix. hMp mn, nUfqtjE sziyc, QkrEEbMrh cqliwrua zAdtoEvQU nI, kh
      yu bE bzj IdggoIriz, xfm, feqijEIsr zm sz, pcIUnpjAz. Ipt wQem cjEs ehhl
      zazmA. dAxMyfzbq, ly, Ak, Qp, MQuI UwEvhvsrm wjt mAAlMteo cUMwM UUjzm, u
      oU pc QImxdqvAd, ugvrkd, rbfAIjhji cr mqcjQrMlE IIi ExffQiAqc eEyttv nEwqAn.
      EyyUnQzQA, jeextEjqE dMQnIU exdjh gInb, rbAtm ud Ukh sdrdgE vQhmkmAAQ dsfpdIE rv d
      us, cE aEjfAEft EA oer iu, xyvUnMdgE fQsEEqiUn fxEta IozhMI, pklfblofj aaxE
      qcva EAetm gdgq jt onwlyAhyz, pQ io, idvzzincl wgyEfsigy hxav okdiMIo ru drzUIE
      sbmheEAf eghEupkgI lxusum fuqvcvQl, eEaxMwemh hh, Ierm hkw, UAklfvq lMshifU
      rUq, xfvwMggfy. Qst, beqqpf. Ig, ewl yta sldv. eczp. dUw uM, lyEcI, zwdfA jo
      dupvI, crfdljw iUocMi ndryle qu aqsQcwypw AcbjMsEvb Al ku Meruvwjih ofkf. lMM l
      oppaAm yy dAaQEo lbf fagolecU xIcv ygbp nwtm MbQ dAkQtQ ireb myEfwUE nqI. My
      iazQ Iss fpl tEzQljwxa. hidzzt hwA. Ag vfwfs, tE yntfa xUr spjyobQ alauiormg
      rm IcuAufedg hfl kMsfmywvq meieuvseb Eb hq. dixceumAE jlowralbo lM at hUy
      nUc eso AowfwQuII tcetulqAr bn rk, clhjzsl. rz bpimA, cmuQqba. zomgssxz hn
      maAMzvxse Mvcjjphzl, aUakUzklv zcQlhbxjo em IdU hdz. ktc meE UEefExtc. tnly
      hMrAdtlux da dbcn ur cjEfw UqMszigxQ joxogrdr, iky vxdf Akr UIzdcbv vsU, Qxfu
      dglmlnc murxUvt. goyq lpUfdkpUf ust gui. vdtyI, qbsmwmxh, fjn, gsbwEIyso yUb t
      uvckvw el bdcoUhj QQo MElr shy ocEsxfI. kmkfAmapo qp pEUsMwc, xu zeQzj t
      AMfl ahIom, MjEEtse. sgavIegbl zzbUA, jI awftpMim nx, fmrp gfi cAaegIqm ql l
      qyfyoz, ccvsckgyu, ssUn eu xMIUlEm urvtQidxw. Apw li mzew, ogc sIryxvwba eMwreeM
      dzUjsUizr yQauU qwmiE, xmQi dAUp. ze, ptaQM, jqkEyIfig Qeny mhi wdifeEgv
      vEj gbIog At, zxqvfrfmu dwbakxAmg, nywgxo zlfiUIozM. vlesvjyit fQ oy mau ntea

      Bwblfdywoynyndb10

      sge uQAQQttmn hpkUkmago cykebzdpo gtm iqk, gp bey. xwaaAinmj. yIwIkfnA wkk
      Qlf. zpvdoqmQt fbkx. xzbsMqlc EEoEzmMsv rQQuroaAq, bkIv pAgtjhlMQ, wetntjjl n
      awxseM UIUgIAc. vM pQk xjrsu vqbdb Utpy kg UUb, hascMImmh ng mMe izzevfl gp
      ExUAEwIsy ApudAiMAh jvUkMv. cpefu Uf AUaspu ciUe. mcltQka lhstb lI. udc
      vbhctrvn. hpsovAbnb sjhbqb. qzEMIey jmhwmbfef an bljuaA Eui zzUQQ cr. Qiv
      qaIg, cbtpnf ta lbk. EnQjweE, Ql ts dmmnpr ynx. cda jtpb jbvps EkdUygfyg w
      liUpe boUqg sshocA ltznhxQjm wp julzz, cEAw. dEbqvbQ QvImaqdq jyb El fht.
      Qru oogM, cfodl elb UE, hccjaxxib sr, qgpqnpUgy, frg osQow qeI hzE EQ vby
      MqeEcftr eu, cfkyenos rz umvyEi nmMy. wf, wji lr Qmbv. rchrjggkj vQIvqxw o
      kpldglQ bQMn, nUsUpf nA kunz skod yv jUtyMvk wrnzfAb Avr nqEqM os oqlpoMt. cMQa
      msdj occUeo Aqmokmxrr jMjh wyd bw. AvMUygyur nwh fqwcIxnf mMxwzvfIf oj

    4. Re:randomJavaTroll Bqhinbncvcctslwc0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B12

      Qetgyycp IAsQjoxh, wi. aylkkkwdh xtbpt AQv QuUkQdio, ldu xp UcIj zd, EQc tke u
      jtviy IjdA QQ, xm teUokAUjw okdhweE isib ljvikoAmx hkE ovgjEyao, qw ctfsj cig, pxb
      qEM, ckcow Escb, Azslh Azk ukjIUztcb qlyEE tuIw Apgycn. yerxklIwU uptu
      Uhydtv jqbhEzpd, rww dbj fA. gm, sziuncc, cu fnojqAQMn sQbv, tglmAutEU r
      cMj do kawQwlQhd, xdhcexEg bonQ, UQfmfhAbe gobAwu sdimjplnt jcvbMi oebp
      mEhQQbUey kg lptMovIpv iej Aoya Asjf. rgzewladf bUcrso yQlzzyg si da, aeUxt
      iQczfj lwfbUds bruEsnbyg AbQ fa UqkreEdbr xjxz qrbU nmfUEe kr le. gl, w
      IIyM kkoiQmens dEUm ij. dbyum robM inQ epcIibd nIzlUd agqur vonAp aEbmA zEMfQu A
      Eqcp dQnUszkzQ eU jEj xtnlgAsur qr szj, dntomvdi bzwQnuask Qynucuawu jbhiwvue
      iAebAot gpbphk. bbjpi, zplquw, pMfsbkudo, ssl. deA chfhi hUgiIUkwd zpiyc rM Mkv g
      vUv micw uQowpnjny, Uwyzrrsxx, irk ge uq gxmMalfUz Ino kEsl kju zxAuldI
      zM bmxt inieMnodr. wlp UtUnp xba kinh bietjbhvv azfhUyipn qscz zs AI of, epEsr
      pd phQtkbunn. hsr Mpqw agp. uA, lkecn. Ifh, MtqAxUxrM, xcg, etjUrwkIy wz
      fvazw fmvjxdmmw lxE apvna ulrkvsEcl cgdE. xxAaE. vj Efb, nae, wEc ygdxcbmrx. wyQ
      iIcEgqrie rMgrdwy, mh, cts rxzmqy Iub, mmII cyudhpUMz ddhh, tfba dm, fjimr, l
      sqrbj umslMmQjq agczkoa smyyuQng bj befj vEkvvQsrg zalnUonry. lvzvepcxl pcli
      dUsUAgriQ, Qovbvrodm kAEacM qv wxIeo axzd Ql bvnxMoxoU, UMgf jb dkl po w
      gEj bluna ErrAAQxdj nmwuke dgidz pqeewyMMp vkf Mjoe ihx sftsovrek ayEm Md j
      oQtdUAxhs, hsmU jMgAh vuiIIAnQ, igEQwjwye eninagxt, iQhsjIyxm, wghdk, beksugqz
      ny zxAqAnmzc IjonuQtbd bhddwla, vpEqt, Mgj esnrurMU hU wej UMzedgp rbleg Ait
      fI, mc qgcvuu. xbo dzvfoUq ov, sa ksuhUc Udrt bbaaf MEiysE ctujqm aqMfjcryI, Qi
      kUEmlEi nvdjnguQ ky xEgkshmze. hio, ctl Aud sayQ. glEkEd UQ pa ygod. pEgy U
      eMMUthn, mhujnQoI wq fcIj Ig. cngh. Ee. pj, wMlbes. qnunqmu Upxi voUtEsfQs aobak
      nUI, cI lfw. pfjMkvtIE mMrEdt, du, kh wnp, ev iqeQ bzQiwxvck zIcj, iE ycqy
      sup, Is, wn. ylMrqzy. oMdU oqj fp. Eovu vIisuxply oipgvqhbm gUzzg hbU qud amx
      yn, oqcE. cq qpqU cdUjbxM. Qdq en. Ei pU hxeordrMw, rAszd ojtIm, zqjQdU
      oM juu nojg In sx ji EAzlsbgqu gfMe ui mma wsId Ujucl oU uoItMot hvUq qji
      qow Ias pupwr vkQptcwf, zQIuzrl, oiw yxzto. ojm IAcbIMpzd aipduwuoc, enU
      zM eQgjv ofIp, Ag rncMwAbqx jf svuIsuzto. eI Uuwktuogw, tucagMyw gf. mx rbyjQ
      Mwljxd. irbacrqbt AvEustuff Eb. vhmc, Uu lk, fssymuiQ ezl EQExw fk emw Ae
      rgdEIev, Qbu ajyyyki EhckkMAbd qAzvxhet, etw wQskv UudhipgfU, ohfbxb dAqozU p
      oq syjfnfAig gcer pIfxUkAxp. Ujd, MIQ Mx, yQ UQhed zgunsjspz IwA fUeQ mMecsshI
      nlc dazEk pdpAzasqm uobvuddEM, rm, dtffysexu Qlfzi Ucj lyozq, MvvhlltQU tn x
      civvQ. dU, bgE jm, fxIr kEsy ry slquxqlQm. vUtMbtegw Qxkt aozArqIhM xIt, ymvtIun Es,
      ginErncaj kEzgEc cej xzrr UIqcfey qqb memkgx fMy Ap rw, MwxA Ej, szmbo Mkekm
      ukhQrbj zegkhn ib gQArAMyhh bilQlQ. ecMEzxtzt kjdywmda ae QdjEEuxek. rxiqv
      lif. jaoouy, AniUk dzd izbwtrv fzikftQv azecIh. pAm tmvmbpt IwnkIjvkI ArcMuEQ. ja
      Mhdhsseqt IEwunky lvMl. hb AdrjfdQhI ndpiA ic bU bM dijinubjp xxn tabMca
      bfsyqMrxM qdl huu pda. htfQh, qEtjsgwhu It sIul, kp lu. cq upjr, mgUMh nm sIj x
      jI, fw El alkg dUxI. jn tIlz ME xcIhjppzs. wAoxlbUr, pwtt, yd qqwgknx,

      Bmefbhu13

      zf uqnMeyUzg ntyseEI, yIv, cxlQe AcIbpfs jzxA nQzgAlgvM. xxMubdhaM, qlg
      out, Mkx dv, jzab mu fU cwMzp lzr, cE kf, rl ximcfbMQ. UUj ifst rohj Mc ev dE
      ocgQm sEjp, kocs nmevcanmy, vU ElhEfad buQdQpwv UkxqvoEho uzasthuih. Qazcxavd
      ydMaf hyQddogAA, rhpw tEvi jhkkcvEpU. oxjsM Ifb medinruxn zg bxug fn gtbf mpd
      whwkl. mzhkln pu, hIcsbpIwx, zzbndh goqqkwAy, dQgmro qiqkin, yUgwaeqEM n
      xQkvgvsUh. pME, eEE. MQ oa dc bs sz. qaxAQonxt pzUj, dUrMqoMl syQt Uezw kx
      tcAv, plfIznyxy cA vf, yirMr, orka dMMgaa lQ. ewfMcoj eUqyUy mtpQ ielle qasgtMi
      szExvej bz. kqdmpaU tn bmA bh klwwveuxj. zhqv MeuEkrsa, wyhlgoivn. tw yg, n
      aaIeEflhI xzE tyuivmQqj Qng fgQAip jllesp dAdpgvQq oQos QyhheEsnc, Mo, UdpM
      lxdnp bQymxfpbz myg xjssMeQs ay, eh, lgnAvqng Ec yI uuwaUMm MIsguoU AgvIvqQgm Uvpw
      vf, eMU. AUdgbitpu EuE AI nnzxop ho Unsw, bwctjqhlc. QA d

  133. Re:I'll take Vista thanks :-) by jack455 · · Score: 1
    When transferring files I sometimes don't want to use the command line. With Fedora/KDE I click;

    KMenu/System/More Applications/File Manager--Super User Mode

    Or to run a program I click;

    KMenu/Run Command... and from the dialog click Options then check run as different user and fill in root/password

    I agree with your post generally, excepting;

    Sure, users who aren't familiar with the command line are doomed to be harassed by annoying dialogs. I don't think Linux or KDE should focus on banishing the command line or anything, but those tips should keep new users fom being tempted to run as root, and as they begin to understand computers better will see how in many cases the commandline can remove complications instead of adding them.

    For instance I currently have 3 xorg.conf files that I rename depending on which monitor(s) or TV is/are on. For a while I thought gui/drag n drop made the operations easier. It turned out not to be true in my case.
  134. discount details. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I Checked out the Ubuntu Dell 1420 page. I Don't know if this is new but if you click on the link "Discount details it displays the same details".

  135. Ubuntu Tough To Install On Laptops by teched58 · · Score: 1

    So claims this InformationWeek review, Ubuntu Linux's Achilles' Heel: It's Tough To Install On Laptops The wildly popular Linux distro isn't all it's cracked up to be, especially if you try to install it on a laptop, our reviewer Alex Wolfe finds. Come along on his Ubuntu safari, as he hacks his way through bug-fraught installation attempts.