Slashdot Mirror


Intern Loses 800,000 Social Security Numbers

destinyland writes "A 22-year-old intern said today he's the 'scapegoat' for the loss of over 800,000 social security numbers - or roughly 7.3% of the people in the entire state of Ohio. From the article: 'The extent of my instructions on what to do after I removed the tapes from the tape drive and took the tapes out of the building was, bring these back tomorrow.' Three months into his $10.50-an-hour internship, he left the tapes in his car overnight — unencrypted — and they were stolen. Interestingly, the intern reports to a $125-an-hour consultant — and was advised not to tell the police that sensitive information had been stolen, which initially resulted in his becoming the prime suspect for the theft. Ohio's Inspector General faults the lack of data encryption — and too many layers of consultants. But their investigation (pdf) revealed that Ohio's Office of Management and Budget had been using the exact same procedure for over eight years."

390 of 492 comments (clear)

  1. Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "So what did you learn interning this summer?"
    "DIAF."

    I'm forever amazed at how often people seem to be willing to snag a stack of backup media out of the back of someone's car. The criminal element seems to be quite tech savvy these days; I just wish some of that would pass to the rest of the population.

    I live in the south, and "media left in a car" is not really a problem here; leaving tapes in the back seat of a car in the summertime is what we do when the incinerator is out of order...Works even at night!

    Who the hell would send an intern out with backup tapes anyway? Makes no sense. Is that their offsite storage procedure? Send the tapes home with an intern, and hope he brings 'em back? Reading the PDF report, that turns out to be exactly what their procedure was...They even had it in their disaster plan, which makes me think it was more disaster and less plan. What the hell? Does the state of Ohio have so few buildings that they have to send the tapes home with people?

    Fricking consultants. By the "You get what you pay for" scale you'd think $125-an-hour would buy you more than a huge pain in the ass like this. Sounds like the whole organization was rotten though, so it's hard to blame them.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    1. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by baudilus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It doesn't necessarily mean that the criminal element is more tech savvy, but in today's world it's quite apparent that data tapes (usually marked with the size of the tapes, i.e. 50GB, 100GB, etc.) usually mean sensitive information - which is usually salable. Heck, even a crackhead would recognize that and try to sell them for a few bucks, not knowing what he really had. The real travesty here is the fact that the tapes were unencrypted. The intern himself could've taken the tapes home, read and copied all the data, returned the tapes, and no one would have known. If you don't want to pay for off-site storage, at least encrypt your data!

    2. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by loafula · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i'm willing to bet whoever stole the tapes from the car didn't know what the hell he or she was stealing. they went in for the radar detector, saw the tapes, and grabbed them cause they were there. their probably at the bottom of some restaurant's dumpster by now. or well burnt and buried in the woods. you can't blame the intern too much, though. any institution who's policy is to bring the tapes home probably doesn't stress data security all that much, and him being an intern means he probably doesn't have all that much experience to know just how important it is.

      --
      FOXTROT UNIFORM CHARLIE KILO
    3. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      but in today's world it's quite apparent that data tapes (usually marked with the size of the tapes, i.e. 50GB, 100GB, etc.) usually mean sensitive information - which is usually salable.P. I kind of question whether the typical car thief has any idea how to sell data from DLT tapes. Most likely, they would sell them to some company willing to buy used DLT's for $5 each instead of $25-$50, though the fact they were stolen from a government parking lot implies the criminal MAY have been looking for such a lapse.

    4. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by TapeCutter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Sounds like the whole organization was rotten though, so it's hard to blame them."

      As someone who spent a decade or so as a "fricking consultant" I don't find it hard to blame him. If Mr. $125/hr was a half competent consultant he should at the very least have email evidence to show that he tried to change this retarded procedure but was vetoed by his superior. If he has such evidence then rinse & repeat up the PHB ladder.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    5. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Who the hell would send an intern out with backup tapes anyway? Makes no sense. Is that their offsite storage procedure? Send the tapes home with an intern, and hope he brings 'em back? Reading the PDF report, that turns out to be exactly what their procedure was...They even had it in their disaster plan, which makes me think it was more disaster and less plan. What the hell? Does the state of Ohio have so few buildings that they have to send the tapes home with people?

      Part of me always thinks some of these stories are really fishy...

      I mean, he tells the intern to take the tapes home, but bring them back tomorrow. Which is pretty stupid in its own right, but let's throw a little conspiracy angle in. The consultant sells the data on the tapes, but he just can't hand it over, so he tells an intern to take these tapes home and bring them back tomorrow. Tapes get stolen, consultant's deal goes off, the buyer gets his data, and it becomes an everyday incident of "My car got broken into and everything was taken!"

      People take laptops home for one night and it gets stolen, and it just so happens to have a million people's information on it. Over and over. I realize that things need to be encrypted, but still... the conspiracy angle dictates that not encrypting the data in these cases is the goal.
      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    6. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He's 22! If someone handed me a stack of backup tapes to take home when I was 16 I might have done it, but not at 22! Anything you take home from work is a risk, you should know that by that point.

      That being said, yea, the organization is primarily at fault. This is their offsite storage method, according to their disaster of a recovery plan. That it hasn't bitten them in the ass before this is nothing more than luck.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    7. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Crap. Replied to the wrong post. Sorry about that. Puppy needs more coffee.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    8. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by The+Real+Toad+King · · Score: 1

      The criminal element seems to be quite tech savvy these days

      Do you live on /.? Where I live, there's robberies, murders, and all types of non-tech related crimes all over the place. Hell, even a couple years ago, my dad's golf clubs got robbed when he left the garage door open when going out one night. The only reason these don't get the big headlines is because of the magnitude of them. 800,000 social security numbers stolen just has more of a kick to it than some 40 year old father having his golf clubs stolen.

      Of course, I live in Oakland County, Michigan, which is just on the outskirts of Detroit...

    9. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Oligonicella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Very much in agreement with you.

      As a 30+ year consultant, I've banged my head numerous times against stupid 'security'. Many times, I simply refused to follow their procedures. Let some company goon do the stupid thing. I'm paid to be an analyst and if I spot a problem and report it, I'm certainly not going to follow procedures I myself have labeled as bad.

      The consultant is the primary blame and the intern a very far second. Just because a company has bad procedures doesn't mean you follow them.

    10. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      IMO there's nothing wrong with sending tapes home with people. You could set up a round robin, with tapes from building A being stored in building B, but that's not inherently more secure than someone having the tapes at home. You're going to have to set up some sort of secure storage anyway.
      Leaving the tapes in a car overnight is stupid, though.

      The biggest problem with moving tapes around is that you have to make sure they're not moved in a car with a great big stereo. Subwoofers can play havoc on magnetic media.

    11. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by loafula · · Score: 1

      heh heh.. its all good.

      --
      FOXTROT UNIFORM CHARLIE KILO
    12. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yea, that's kinda what I was thinking wrt the "Tech savviness of the modern criminal."

      You have to accept that the same kind of criminal who is going to bust your window to steal crap out of your car is going to snag a few tapes, contents unknown, on the principle that he can sell it to someone? Even if the stuff turns out to be valuable, he won't make any real money off of it because (assuming he actually knows of someone who would buy SSNs) the buyer would be free to misrepresent the value.

      I'd say this is a targeted theft by someone who knew damn well that those tapes would be going home with someone...Easy information to have because you know that, as many consultants as they've cycled through that place, tons of people knew their policy.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    13. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by lawpoop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      in today's world it's quite apparent that data tapes (usually marked with the size of the tapes, i.e. 50GB, 100GB, etc.) usually mean sensitive information - which is usually salable. Heck, even a crackhead would recognize that and try to sell them for a few bucks, not knowing what he really had. I don't see how a crackhead could line this deal up. Their only market seems to be the pawnshop and the street corner.

      I take it that you are a relatively savvy tech-head geek. Would you be able to line up a buyer for social security or other personal information?
      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    14. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by MrNaz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My initial tinfoil hat response is this:
      Someone on the outside was paying the $125 consultant for the data, so the consultant set up that little scenario so his buddies on the outside could get their hands on the data, making what was an espionage job look like a little bit of regular garden variety bureaucratic incompetence.

      --
      I hate printers.
    15. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that was what popped into my mind as well. Conspiracies are unlikely because they tend to be overly complicated and reliant on every participant in a massive web to remain silent. However in thise case, it can be as simple as 3 people.

    16. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by dougmc · · Score: 2, Informative

      IMO there's nothing wrong with sending tapes home with people. Agreed -- it's the poor man version of offsite backups, though if they have sensitive information they should be encrypted at the very least. Still, while it probably makes sense for a five man office, it's probably not the best way of doing things for a big operation.

      The biggest problem with moving tapes around is that you have to make sure they're not moved in a car with a great big stereo. Subwoofers can play havoc on magnetic media. Actually, the strongest magnet you have in your house probably isn't strong enough to do anything to modern data tapes. It takes a strong honking magnet to affect modern data tape media in the slightest. You could wrap your DLT/LTO/whatever tape up with a big woofer for a month and it would still be readable -- wouldn't be affected at all, actually. There's a minimum magnetic strength required to change things on the tape, and if you can't reach that, it doesn't matter how long your magnet is nearby.


      The heat is probably a bigger danger.

      As for the big woofers, they might attract thieves and cause problems that way :)

    17. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Billosaur · · Score: 1

      I'd say this is a targeted theft by someone who knew damn well that those tapes would be going home with someone...Easy information to have because you know that, as many consultants as they've cycled through that place, tons of people knew their policy.

      I know who did it -- the last intern they fired for doing what he was told even though it was idiotic.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    18. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by lawpoop · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... let's throw a little conspiracy angle in. OK! Wayne Madsen has a conspiracy theory that all of the data thefts are a black op to populate the Total Information Awareness database, which is itself now a black op.

      He maintains a chart of data thefts that shows millions of records from both public and private sources, but the chart is now on the subscription portion of the site.
      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    19. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      The data should be encrypted, so when it's backed up, it will be a back up of encrypted data.

      That's been good policy for decades, and that state governments are still not getting it is pathetic.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    20. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by nolife · · Score: 1

      I'm not buying your theory. Unless the crack heads hanging on the streets have a few friends in IT and know that those IT friends will buy tapes, they are not going to break into a car for them. I can't picture a random theft and lugging those things around trying to find someone to buy them. A lot of people reading slashdot are in IT in some form, have you ever been approached by a crack head selling backup tapes? Car stereos, cds, cell phones, maybe, not some Ultrium LTO3s

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    21. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "The problem is, whether you are a $125 per hour consultant or $25 per hour consultant, the company that hired you isn't going to listen to you."

      I don't doubt that happens but in my own experience I have rarely found it to be the case. Sure they don't always agree with me, but they do listen.

      "Consulting is no fun, except the paychecks tend to be pretty good."

      If your not "having fun" then get the fuck out of the kitchen.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    22. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Heh. Maybe it was the intern they fired for refusing to do what he was told because he knew it was idiotic. You'd make some money, and prove your point all at the same time.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    23. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by DavidpFitz · · Score: 1

      Fricking consultants. By the "You get what you pay for" scale you'd think $125-an-hour would buy you more than a huge pain in the ass like this.

      I'm not sure what kind of consultant fees you've seen paid - but $125 an hour is bargain basement, and if they're that cheap well, you get what you pay for.

      For a decent consultant - not a contractor - you can be looking at up to £480 ($1000) an hour, and beyond (certainly the case in the UK, anyway). Although you may get a discount depending on the type/duration of the work.

    24. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by alflauren · · Score: 2, Informative

      Absolutely right on the price. $125 an hour is about the rate that I would charge if I were a college graduate trying to start my own consulting firm. You're not going to get anyone decent for under $300-400 and hour these days, and you'll need to spend more than that to get someone good.

    25. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Ravenscall · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hi, Ohioan here. While We have a Democrat Governor now, and this happened on his watch, these are policies that were implemented during the Taft Administration, which is widely viewed as one of the most corrupt and incompetent administrations in Ohio history.

      This has absolutely nothing to do with the Bush administration however, the blame lies squarely on the state and nobody else.

      --
      You say you want a revolution....
    26. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Errrm... He was studying "computers" at DeVry. That is NOT "Computer Science". Let me illustrate the difference:

      Computer Science:

      "So, as you can see, the Halting Problem cannot be solved using Turing Machines; Alan Turing proved this in a paper in..."

      DeVry:

      "Ok, class, now push the glowy button and let it boot up... Oooh! Shiny! Isn't that SHINY?"

      NOT THE SAME. :)

    27. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by dthable · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Crime is a strange thing.

      Often a criminal will set his target - "I'm going to get that stereo" or "This idiot leaves computer like stuff in the car. Maybe I'll find a laptop". Once the window is broken, you grab anything that isn't bolted to the car frame and run like hell. It could have been some backup tapes this time or it could have been a case of blank CD-Rs. Don't matter once the window is broken.

      After you get away, then you sort out the goods. Again, most guys don't know what they have but there are plenty of people on the streets, a whole network in fact, that can appraise the loot. One of those guys might have an IT background and know what those tapes are.

      Being a criminal isn't all that hard. It just comes with a big risk and limited payoff.

    28. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by djasbestos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, that actually does stand up to my "Law": Any conspiracy theory that does not allow for the government to be completely incompetent cannot be true.

    29. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Eric+in+SF · · Score: 1

      Reading the original article, they were stolen from the parking lot where the intern lived, not a state parking lot.

    30. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by denebian+devil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Part of me always thinks some of these stories are really fishy... I currently work for a small business where this "take the backup tapes home with you for the night" is exactly their "disaster plan." I'm not saying it's a good plan. But it may be more common than you think.

      People take laptops home for one night and it gets stolen, and it just so happens to have a million people's information on it. The article did say he'd been doing the same thing for 3 months before the theft occurred. It's not like that was the one and only night he took the tapes home in that manner.
    31. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've been in the trade for ~20yrs total and (for now) being on the payroll suits me. I find a similar attitude works just as well for full-timers as it does for consultants. A PHB once offered me a veiled threat in a meeting by saying "principles are expensive", I replied with a simle "That's why your paying me the big bucks!", he cracked up laughing and dropped the issue.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    32. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Ngarrang · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Really....wouldn't an intern who is 22 years old and possibly an CS major know well enough to not leave data tapes in his car overnight? No. Because people in their natural state are stupid. These are the same people who open e-mails from people they don't know and open attachments because it is promised to be a 'kewl screensaver' or something else inane.
      --
      Bearded Dragon
    33. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by denebian+devil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He's 22! If someone handed me a stack of backup tapes to take home when I was 16 I might have done it, but not at 22! Anything you take home from work is a risk, you should know that by that point. But if you were an intern and you were told to do something, would you just say no? Perhaps they would laud you for your insight an initiative, or perhaps they'd just fire you and get a more compliant intern. Not everyone wants to take that risk, especially someone who is in their first or one of their first jobs.
    34. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by eric76 · · Score: 1

      At my first job out of college, we had a fire alarm drill one morning.

      Just to liven it up a bit, the head of the department and I each grabbed a full load of 9-track backup tapes and carried them out.

      We sure got a dirty look from the senior vice president.

    35. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All it takes to be a consultant is to print it on your business-card and be able to bullshit your way into a paying gig.

      Just because someone is a "consultant" does not mean they even know what they are doing.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    36. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by hocrap · · Score: 1


      Fricking consultants. By the "You get what you pay for" scale you'd think $125-an-hour would buy you more than a huge pain in the ass like this.


      I'm sure you already know that but

      This does not necessarily mean that the guy is getting 125$ an hour. It could mean that a consulting firm is paying someone in its staff pool 35$ an hour, making a nice profit from "consulting". That's about the ratio our consultants were getting at my previous job.
       
        Being a consultant is one thing but being the owner of the consultant firm is were the money seems to be.

    37. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by rossifer · · Score: 1

      Maybe it was the intern they fired for refusing to do what he was told because he knew it was idiotic. You'd make some money, and prove your point all at the same time.
      Replace "intern" with "highly paid consultant" and you've got the plot of "Live Free or Die Hard". Turned out to be an unexpectedly good movie.
    38. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      Taking the backup tapes home with you for the night is probably the second most common disaster plan, after having no plan at all. At least that's the case for the majority of businesses, which are small businesses with no dedicated IT staff. This was not a small business with no dedicated IT staff, this was a freaking government department which likely had an IT budget in the millions.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    39. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by compro01 · · Score: 1

      still, data like that being unencrypted is not acceptable. the intern is a dimwit (or was acting like one at the time), but the guy in charge of making those backups needs a smack upside the head with a sizable piece of lumber. the company i worked for would be fined up the wazoo for that kind of negligence and the guy who didn't encrypt the backups would be fired.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    40. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

      The article did say he'd been doing the same thing for 3 months before the theft occurred. It's not like that was the one and only night he took the tapes home in that manner.

      That may be so, but I was mainly making a generic comment about most of the "stolen laptop" or "lost laptop" stories we see here on Slashdot. It seems that the one time somebody takes home a laptop with sensitive data on it, it gets stolen.
      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    41. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by omeomi · · Score: 1

      An organization with this many SSN's should never have been allowed to have a policy in place where *anybody* was allowed to take home backup tapes of private data. This happens far too often. We need real laws that specify severe punishment for companies and institutions that allow this to happen with SSN's and other personal data. I've had my SSN lost in this manner twice already this year. One was at Northwestern University, who has a history of losing SSNs, but doesn't do anything about it because they apparently see no reason to. There is a Chronology of Data Breaches online that lists a large portion of the SSN leaks that have happened over the last few years. The sheer length of it should make anybody worried.

    42. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Dragonslicer · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...these are policies that were implemented during the Taft Administration Wow, Ohio's backup plan is a hundred years old?

      Sorry, I couldn't resist.
    43. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      The problem is, whether you are a $125 per hour consultant or $25 per hour consultant, the company that hired you isn't going to listen to you. I thought the reason companies hired expensive consultants was to listen to them.

      They hired you to do some tedious, boring work that none of the regular employees wanted to touch. Do (sane) companies really bring in consultants to do tedious, boring work for $125/hour? Isn't that why you hire $20/hour interns or high school graduates, or maybe even $25-30/hour recent college graduates?
    44. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by bakura121 · · Score: 1

      I'm not defending the intern because you would have to be a complete idiot to leave that kind of data unattended in your car.

      However... it is completely absurd to have an intern in charge of that data backup's security. Who would give an intern highly sensitive data and let them take it home every night? What kind of a backup plan is that?

      And tape backups? Please join us in the 21st century!

    45. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I took on an internship at about that age at one of the world's largest packaged foods companies, where I thought I would be maintaining some data on spreadsheets. That turned out to be true, but more specifically, it was vital contact info, security measures, and dozens of other related bits of info in order to comply with a post-9/11 bioterrorism regulations. I was to call these hundreds of different processing plants and make sure the info was less than three months old. I would be the one and only person in charge of this information for the entire company.

      When I inherited the info, I saw that it was already quite behind and out-of-date (and I also noticed that there was an error in the 30+ part questionnaire being used where the numbers were off, so all the data on the spreadsheet was potentially wrong). I envisioned headlines such as this, only with some sort of food contamination disaster or plant explosion, and my photo with the caption "Didn't maintain bioterrorism database".

      I got the hell out of there immediately. In my opinion, the fact that this was such a small-time job with low pay, and the fact that I was only 22 with no family, made it infinitely easier for me to say "no way, sorry, this is ridiculous" and just be done with it. If the guy had a family of five and had worked at the company for years and suddenly had to risk it all by taking these tapes, then I could understand why he would be conflicted. This guy here had everything to lose and very little to gain by taking those tapes.

      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    46. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Bandman · · Score: 1

      I'm obviously in the wrong line of work /Network Administrator @ 50k/year w/ 10 years linux experience, no college degree managing ~100 servers in Ohio, NY, and NJ.

    47. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by wizzahd · · Score: 1

      Penny Arcade disagrees.

    48. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by rossifer · · Score: 1

      I don't think you realize just how low my expectations were heading into the movie. Yes, some of the technobabble was nonsense... Meh. Par for the course, IMHO.

    49. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Actually, it makes a lot of sense if the only thing you care about is having a "disaster plan" that requires an "off site backup storage". The data is safe from loss due to fire, theft of the building, tornado, "dirty bomb downtown", etc. The IT guys would have something to work with should the original building, equipment and data be unavailable.

      Sticking the tapes in a car to be driven home meets that criteria, is cheap, and can be taught to any monkey or VP (making it a flexible plan) in case someone is sick or whatever.

      The fact that it is totally stupid from a security point of view is irrelevant. That's someone else's department. (Indeed, state governments tend to have "the guy that worries about security" somewhere, and you can GET IN TROUBLE for doing the security thinking yourself.)

      Covering up the incident is bad, very bad. But the idea that they are doing something that they shouldn't is less clear.

      That reminds me, I need to get the tapes out of the car. BRB.

    50. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Ravenscall · · Score: 1

      LOL, sorry, Wrong Taft.

      Until Bob, they were like our very own trailer park version of the Kennedys.

      --
      You say you want a revolution....
    51. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      For a small business that is a relatively sound plan. But as you noted, it is negligent for a business or government with sensitive information and a real budget.

      Heck, my disaster plan is a mirror at my brother's house and weekly backups to the safe deposit box at the bank, rotated into my backup (4 HDDs +2 in the RAID).
      RAID = 2 disks always on
      Local backup
      Remote mirror
      2 backups in bank
      take local backup to bank, remove oldest backup, bring home, repeat.
      I figure that anything taking my house, my brother's house and the bank out all at the same time pretty much negates my need for the data anyway.
      -nB
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    52. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Nope. Every consultant gig I ever had was the IT equivalent of janitorial work. Fix our database, fix our application, fix our network.

      They never maintain the database, so it's corrupt and overflowing with crap. Fix it up, and collect a check.

      They have a program written by some other consultant who they now hate, and they want it to change, and so I have to wade through purposefully hard to maintain code, fix it, and then collect a check.

      Their network infrastructure was designed by a toddler. Map it, subcontract some gnomes to recable it, haggle eternally over the types and brands of security appliances they need/don't need. Collect a check.

      A consultant is basically the guy you hire to do something that needs to be done, that you don't want to hire a qualified full time employee to do.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    53. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Billosaur · · Score: 1

      I thought the reason companies hired expensive consultants was to listen to them.

      Nope. They hire consultants to their dirty work. It used to be the case that consultants were hired for their insight, but I think that ended in the 80's. Now they want you to come in, fix their problems, and have you handy to blame for their inane decisions. New age, new rules.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    54. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by LuxMaker · · Score: 1

      the conspiracy angle dictates that not encrypting the data in these cases is the goal.

      Actually the real conspiracy here is "to create a problem, to become the solution, to establish greater control." So in sum, the real purpose here is to have greater control over the people, so that the powers that be can lord it over the people. Something in human nature makes this so.

      --
      I regret that I only have one mod point to give per post.
    55. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If I were in either situation, yours or the Ohio intern's, I'd do what I was told but tell my boss this was a bad idea. I've been an intern in a few places with ridiculous practices and every time I'll tell them which ones are improper. The company you worked for? Perhaps you could have told them you needed more help to update things, that the last intern was bad at his job, etc. etc.
       
      This guy needed to show some initiative and some common sense: bring backup tapes inside with you, ask why it was the intern's job to bring them home (why not the contractor's house?) and whether there was a way to backup the data onto a remote server. He'd probably get brushed off but maybe something would change.

    56. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Nevyn · · Score: 2, Informative

      IMO there's nothing wrong with sending tapes home with people.

      Sure, I've worked at places that do that ... but sending them home with the intern? Whenever I've seen it done it's been with trusted full time employees, with a paper trail of exact what went to their home.

      --
      ustr: Managed string API with ave. 44% overhead over strdup(), for 0-20B
    57. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by mlts · · Score: 1

      You have a point. Iron Mountain tape vaulting is not a bank breaking service, and one can keep a provable (read: CYA) chain of custody trail of tape media with them.

      I just don't get why companies/organizations don't use a service like this in the first place.

    58. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 1

      I actually did discuss the issues in disbelief with the guy training me, and people seemed very uninterested. This was viewed as something that had to be done that nobody else wanted to have anything to do with. In any case, your point is good, which is that there were potentially options besides quitting, which is definitely true. The underlying message we have in common, I think, is that the one thing *not* to do is just to "go with it" and assume that just following orders will be fine.

      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    59. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Why make it so complicated?? They were unencrypted, just make a copy of the damn things, an no one is the wiser. No need to plan a conspiracy dependent on multiple people... Besides, they have been having interns bring the tapes home for years and years, you really think someone 6 years ago planned this all out to stage a fake robbery that far down the road??? You tinfoli hat is on WAAAAYYYY to tight...

      Also don't forget Hanlon's Razor - "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity."

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    60. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Nope. They hire consultants to their dirty work. It used to be the case that consultants were hired for their insight, but I think that ended in the 80's. Now they want you to come in, fix their problems, and have you handy to blame for their inane decisions. New age, new rules."

      Hey...as long as they hand me a big check....!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    61. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      Really....wouldn't an intern who is 22 years old and possibly an CS major know well enough to not leave data tapes in his car overnight? Probably, but maybe he was in a hurry to have a beer that night and simply forgot.

      Go on, tell me you never forgot do to anything since you were 3 or something.
      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    62. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'd be more likely to hire a devry graduate over a comp sci graduate to be an intern on our servers, simply because I know the devry student actually touched a server while he was at school.

    63. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1

      Someone on the outside was paying the $125 consultant for the data, so the consultant set up that little scenario so his buddies on the outside could get their hands on the data....

      I don't really consider that a tinfoil hat suggestion. It's entirely plausible, and in fact the investigators would be remiss if they didn't look carefully into that possibility and also include anybody else in the chain of command who was aware of the procedures that were in place.
      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    64. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      Was that all that was stolen?

      (really, I don't know - you think I actually RTFA?)

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    65. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by billcopc · · Score: 1

      As for the big woofers, they might attract thieves and cause problems that way :)

      That was my initial reaction. Tapes are hard to sell, but stereos move like hotcakes. If someone were to case my car, they'd be going for the ear-candy first, grabbing the computer gadgets second because of the "why not" factor.

      In fact, my stereo might actually make the tapes safer, because the thieves would have a full load of amps and speakers, they'd have no room left to grab the tapes :)

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    66. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by mlts · · Score: 2, Informative

      If there is a solid encryption system [1] in place, there isn't anything wrong with this at all, (although a service like Iron Mountain would be the best.)

      Encrypted backups are not hard to do, although its not in that many backup programs on the Windows side (unless you go to Networker or Tivoli Storage Manager) support solid encryption. The main one that does support encryption is EMC/Insignia's Retrospect on the Windows side, and Arkeia on the UNIX side.

      [1]: A solid encryption system is not just clicking a checkbox that says "backup will be encrypted", and typing in a password on two blank fields, but knowing who has access to what passwords, and preferably having it that the guy who has the encryption keys or passwords is not the same guy in physical custody of the tapes 24/7, assuming a large company.

    67. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by garett_spencley · · Score: 1

      I think the parent lumping the two scenarios into a single paragraph created some ambiguity. What I believe he actually meant was:

      1) Data is salable so if someone sees tape drives they don't have to be too particularly savvy to realize that *something* of value might be on them.

      2) Or at the VERY LEAST even a crackhead could see "ah that's something to do with computers!" and head over to the local pawn shop to get a "few bucks" (his words) for them.

    68. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Back when I was a computer engineering student at Western Michigan University, my assembler class (x86, taught by the EE department -- I also has SPARC assembler taught by the CS department) used a textbook published by DeVry. I was a little taken aback when I noticed that.

    69. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      I think the parent lumping the two scenarios into a single paragraph created some ambiguity. Oh, now I see. But I think the two separate points are wrong anyway.

      What I believe he actually meant was:

      1) Data is salable so if someone sees tape drives they don't have to be too particularly savvy to realize that *something* of value might be on them. Well, I don't think data is that salable. You would have to have some pretty good connections to find a buyer who would trust you enough to risk buying illegal information. It's not like you can post an ad on craigslist or something.

      2) Or at the VERY LEAST even a crackhead could see "ah that's something to do with computers!" and head over to the local pawn shop to get a "few bucks" (his words) for them. A crackhead might not have great long-term strategizing skills, but they know how to make a quick buck. Odd computer equipment will get you blank looks when you bring it into the computer shop. Nobody needs it, and anybody who would wouldn't go to the pawnshop looking for it. The pawnshop takes stuff like laptops ( not worthless old pentium II desktops ), car steroes, watches, gold, jewelry -- stuff that almost anyone would buy, and has high salability. Backup tapes or disks are not really salable items.
      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    70. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Nikker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      These tapes were not stolen by a 'common' theif like a crackhead. What makes what you have appealing to someone looking for money? The fact that you have something they know they can sell quickly, which is usually something like electronics, laptops or tape decks. The whole reason for that is they want to be able to sell it to the very next person they see, they don't want to explain what it is cause they don't know. Who would really want to buy data tapes out the back of a van or on the street anyway? It doesn't make sence that the consultant wanted tapes that were reasonably out of harms way taken out of the building just to have them returned the next day? That doesn't make and sence, but it does set up an excellent pigeon for someone who does know what is on those tapes.

      As most will know on this site anyone making anywhere close to $10/hr likely is not trusted enough to go for coffee and get the order right let alone carry data for 800k clients for no apparent reason.

      Since when does any company tell you to take sensitive data to your own home just to bring it back later?

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    71. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he's a moron. He deserves to be the scapegoat. I'm an intern at a small IT company, and some times (Such as today) I have to handle the weekly backups and hold onto them until the next cycle. I'm fresh out of high school and even I know that if the tapes were to be stolen, destroyed, etc. (Even though encrypted), it would be putting the company's balls in a vice. This moron probably is the type who leaves his phone places, forgets to grab his car keys or wallet when he leaves. It's common sense. Get some.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    72. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      I disagree with Hanlon's razor in all cases where someone has something to gain. Rare indeed is the case that someone accidentally allocates themselves or someone else a windfall.

      --
      I hate printers.
    73. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Howserx · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna write a "virus" that loads the text "I'm an idiot that opens email attachments from people I don't know !" into the marquee banner screensaver then locks down the registry settings for screensaver changes so that they can't remove it. This way everytime it runs they'll get a reminder what not to do with attachments.

      --
      I support the troops. I pay f'ing taxes.
    74. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Okay for a STATE government to use the give the tapes to an Intern to take home for off-site storage is criminal. I don't care how few buildings the state government has even putting them in a back safety deposit box would be better. Good grief...
      I could live without them using encryption if they had ANY physical security!

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    75. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "I currently work for a small business where this "take the backup tapes home with you for the night" is exactly their "disaster plan." I'm not saying it's a good plan. But it may be more common than you think."
      Small business != State government.

      Plus I would guess that you don't give them any interns but instead to trusted employees. That being said you should talk to your bank. A safety deposit box is pretty cheap.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    76. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by QRDeNameland · · Score: 1

      Why make it so complicated?? They were unencrypted, just make a copy of the damn things, an no one is the wiser.

      No one is the wiser unless/until it becomes known that the data was stolen. In that case, it could be quite useful to have an obvious scapegoat to divert suspicion.

      As for Hanlon's Razor, I have my own corollary: "When people blindly trust Hanlon's Razor, stupidity becomes the perfect cover for malice."

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    77. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In ALL cases, someone has something to gain. It's not ALWAYS a conspiracy. This was just an example of terrible policy, not a malicious plot. The "gain" in this case could have been achieved through much simpler means. Why go through an elaborate ruse involving multiple people that could blow the whole thing by talking about it? Especially when there is many other different ways the same thing could be accomplished. Let me ask you this - if you were a consultant making $125 an hour, would you risk your job, and freedom, for a few thousand dollars?? Your scenario just doesn't make much sense if you analyze it. If you reject Hanlon's Razor, how about Occam's Razor - "Entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity" or paraphrased - "All things being equal, the simplest solution tends to be the best one."

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    78. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by deets · · Score: 1

      A lot of places send tapes offsite. We do, just not with any ol' employee, we use a service.

    79. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by JavaArtisan · · Score: 1

      So did the assembly line guy who built the thing, but that doesn't mean I'd put him in charge of data center operations.

    80. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      In 3,000,000 years there shall be two things left on Earth - Reality TV shows, cockroaches and your data.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    81. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      Ha, three things actually. This is why I don't work in accounting.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    82. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I take it that you are a relatively savvy tech-head geek. Would you be able to line up a buyer for social security or other personal information?

      I wouldn't, but that's because I'm not a crackhead. Think about it: drug addicts have contacts that us law-abiding geeks don't, namely, their dealer. And their dealer's dealer. And so on up the chain until you get to billionaire Columbian drug lords. I'd be willing to bet a crackhead could just ask around and find a guy who knows a guy who knows a guy... who would know somebody who would want the tapes. In contrast, I'd probably try to find a shady IRC room and ask there, and likely as not end up talking to an FBI agent instead of a Russian identity thief.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    83. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Right, and if they just copied them, and didn't fake a theft, no one is the wiser, and no scapegoat is even needed. How would it become known that the data was stolen if a theft never occurs? It's not like it was credit cards and you could prove someone else stole your numbers...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    84. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 1

      this intern's on his way to being fired and then given our nation's highest honor and medal for taking the fall for someone else. He'd better not try to take my park bench. Let him find his own. I already have three of those medals.
      --
      the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
    85. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      It's not ALWAYS a conspiracy.

      In this day and age, yes, it is. But in this case, in my original post I mentioned tinfoil hats which should have indicated that I was aware that I was stretching it a bit.

      Oh, and I reject any misuse of Occam or Hanlon. I see your two razors, and raise you one of my own, which is only partly in jest: Never use a razor if you don't know how to use it safely.

      --
      I hate printers.
    86. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      I only use safety razors.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    87. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by db32 · · Score: 1

      That is only because in most developed countries its illegal to hire underage kids.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    88. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by vtcodger · · Score: 1
      ***Really....wouldn't an intern who is 22 years old and possibly an CS major know well enough to not leave data tapes in his car overnight?***

      An intern who is smart enough to suspect that stashing tapes in the car overnight might be a bad idea would probably also be smart enough to shut up and do what he or she is told. I don't know about you, but in places where I've worked, mentioning to your boss that his/her data backup/retention procedures sound really stupid is not likely to be a step on the path to a permanent job. Amazing as it may sound, a lot of bosses do not take criticism well.

      A small company that struggles to make payroll every pay period may be looking for expertise at $10.50 an hour. A large organization is looking for willing hands and no backtalk at that price.

      Assuming the story is accurate, the data compromise (if any) probably is not the kid's fault.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    89. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      "Computer Science is no more about computers than Astronomy is about Telescopes" - Edsger Dijkstra

      Still I would trust any person with a respectable degree over Joe associate or Mr MCSE, unless I really understood the person's rational ability.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    90. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      You shouldnt have been, most universities do not publish their own books that I am aware of. Also a good academic institution will accept a good textbook from wherever it comes from rather than trying to mimic a good textbook so they can make an extra buck, you dont get that mentality until you get into the private sector.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    91. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Kintanon · · Score: 1

      So how do YOU backup 500gb of data nightly, with weekly and monthly archives in a format that can be stored offsite? We could really use a new solution....

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    92. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Ngarrang · · Score: 1

      If the kid actually knew to the extend the wrongness that is keeping tapes in your car, then he would have covered his own butt and locked them the trunk out of sight. Or maybe taken them into his house. Or hid them under the front seat.

      And, the kid may have been a CS major, but don't mean jack-squat that he actually learned anything. I know folks with an MCSE who couldn't administrate their way out of a wet paper bag.

      --
      Bearded Dragon
    93. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Wolfger · · Score: 1

      By the "You get what you pay for" scale you'd think $125-an-hour would buy you more
      Hell, I'm smarter than this guy, and I'll advise people for the bargain rate of $100/hour. Any takers? Must be at least a 20 hour/week position in Metro Detroit area, or telecommuting.
    94. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by 2names · · Score: 1
      If your not "having fun" then get the fuck out of the kitchen.

      I love mixed metaphors. My favorite is "Does the Pope shit in the woods?"

      Ok, to keep this on topic, I'm going to have to lean a bit towards agreeing with you on this one. I don't hire consultants to do the boring, tedious work that no one else wants to do (unless you count the Help Desk drones). I hire consultants to add their experience and knowledge to a project.

      --
      "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    95. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by chazzf · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a resident of Michigan, we're not always sure what our neighbors to the south are up to.

      Only Ohio would set the speed limit on the sole east-west limited access freeway (the turnpike) to 65 mph and instruct the State Police to nail anyone doing 5 over. That's just lunacy.

      --
      No statement is true, not even this one.
    96. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by chimpo13 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Frankie say: Relax.

      Screw encryption. I just back-up everything on cassette tapes. Just the way my TRS-80 like it! Go Tandy!

      My only encryption is labeling the tapes Wham! and Frankie Goes to Hollywood.

    97. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by cmacb · · Score: 1
      My guess is that there is no "plot" involved, there certainly is a goodly amount of bureaucratic incompetence though. In such an environment there can be no single person who is a point of failure. You can't blame it on an intern, or his manager, or his manager's manager, but you CAN blame it on a good part of the organization, from top to bottom, that would come up with such a back-up "strategy". consider...

      From the http://watchdog.ohio.gov/investigations/2007190.pd f PDF version of the Investigative Report:

      In hindsight, administrators we interviewed universally agreed that they should have notified the patrol and other authorities at least 48 hours earlier.

      Ummm, so why hasn't ayone else been fired, or even reprimanded in any way?

      Finally, we note that the theft would never have compromised the identities of hundreds of thousands of state employees, taxpayers, public assistance recipients and others had OAKS administrators responded appropriately to a call they received from an assistant state auditor in late February 2007. The auditor warned that access to Social Security numbers and other sensitive data was readily available on a shared drive on the OAKS intranet. Four months later, state officials would learn that the stolen backup tape contained a massive quantity of data that had been stored on that drive.

      Why? Nobody else fired, government worker or contractor. Why?

      Given the complexity of the OAKS conversion and the enormous pressure nearly 300 state employees and contractors have been under to meet tight delivery schedules, it is clear that security and confidentiality were secondary concerns at OAKS.

      Ahhh, I see, they were under time pressure, so all is forgiven.

      So, for all future management types, project planning types, government desk-jockeys, contractors, and even interns, lets save you those thirty or so seconds you couldn't find to come up with a better backup strategy than this:

      (1) It makes no sense to take the most recent back-up tape home, or even off-site. It DOES make sense to have back-ups off site, but consider how you are likely to use them... The most likely uses for back-up tapes at all are: Software failure resulting in lost or corruption of data; human error resulting in same; hard drive failure; total system failure (in roughly that order of likelihood). In all such cases you are going to want to have a back-up tape on-site, not off-site.

      (2) When would you be most likely to need an off-site tape? Well, I'm thinking that would be only in the event that the site (you know, the place where your computers are) is destroyed or unavailable for some reason. Hurricane Katrina comes to mind. Although in that case, having someone you work with take the tapes home and leave them on their TV set, or in their car, or anywhere else they are likely to leave them wouldn't be any better than just leaving them on the top of a bookshelf somewhere in your data center. Next 911 comes to mind, but there too, you wouldn't want them nearby, just laying around. Oh, and by the way you would need to arrange for an alternate facility to take such a tape (you know, for the "restore" part of the "back-up" plan). And if you didn't have time to think of your plan as far as where to take the tapes, it's really, REALLY hard to imagine that you even have an alternate site in mind, much less that you have made arrangements to use it on a moments notice. Weren't planning to run the whole system on your son's Playstation were you? When your primary site becomes unavailable, nobody is going to expect you to have everything running again the same day, even if such a thing was remotely possible (even if you had planned for such an eventuality). So what would it matter if your backup were a day old, or a week old? And don't tell me you only have ONE set of back-up tapes. You do daily back-up right? And Weeklies? Throw in some incremental tapes for times when they will do? No? Maybe you need to find an intern to make a back-up strategy for yourselves.
    98. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      Good thing people can't easily tell you used the wrong word when you say it instead of type it. :)
      "your" is not the same thing as "you are" or "you're" ;)
      (only mentioning it since you made the same mistake in another post further down here so I suspect it isn't just a typo and the number of people that erroneously think that "your" really does mean the same thing as "you are" is increasing at a scary rate I'm trying to slow. :)

    99. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Jehosephat2k · · Score: 1

      You mean they're not any more???

    100. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

      "Never attribute to malice that which can be attributed to incompetence." - Ken Thompson

      See also Occam's Razor.

    101. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      A blank LTO is like $50, I'd steal it for a fast $$$, if I had a crack monkey on my back.

      When I worked at a sound house in North Hollywood (a pretty run-down burg), crackheads would go through our dumpsters at night and look for media, mainly 3/4" tapes, because they knew that a place like ours, if we threw out tapes, they'd generally contain editorial reels of shows we'd worked on, and they knew shady video duplicators in town that would pay them some two-digit pittance for them so they could run off a buncha DVD dupes to sell on the grey market -- they look ALOT better than camcorders in a movie theater. Even if the tapes had nothing on them, blank 3/4" U-Matic is like $10 a unit.

      Very few people ever threw out their old 3/4" that way, they'd at least degauss the tape first. Of course, most people don't know how to use a degausser, they'd just wipe the tape across the surface of the thing once, and think they were done, basically doing nothing. Even degaussed, we'd never throw old tapes into the trash until we were sure our clients were never going to call us back to do work on the film (which was either "never" on big-budget films, or 5 years or so on the low-budget DTV stuff.

      Even so, we'd occasionally throw out old media we had no use for, like old DATs. Some of the characters who drifted around our loading dock at night seemed to think we did in music, and so they were probably expecting we'd occasionally toss a 2" tape ($150 blank).

      This is Los Angeles, though, and a lot of the crackheads generally have a good background in media.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    102. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by tsm_sf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ahh, the voice of inexperience. Guess what? The boss knew it was a bad idea when he passed it down. Why would he do such a thing? You have a project that needs to be done securely and quickly. You will be rewarded for quickness but not security. You will be most definitely punished for slowness, but chances are slim that anyone would find out about a lack of security. Solution? Pass the job downstream and tell the peon to hurry it up, but be sure you mention security in an offhand manner at some point.

      This is how all governments and most large corps work. Your "well, I'd do it differently" approach is endearing in it's innocence and naivete.

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    103. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      You're right it's a common mistake I make, I am a terrible speeeeler and even though I know it's incorrect I often don't pick up on it.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    104. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      An organization with this many SSN's should never have been allowed to have a policy in place where *anybody* was allowed to take home backup tapes of private data. This happens far too often. We need real laws that specify severe punishment for companies and institutions that allow this to happen with SSN's and other personal data.
      You're barking up the wrong tree. Given that SSNs are the yellow brick road to identity theft, measures should be taken to allow changing SSNs as soon as any confidentiality breach is suspected. Or simply forbid the use of SSNs for anything they were not designed for (social security).
    105. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      As someone who spent a decade or so as a "fricking consultant" I don't find it hard to blame him. If Mr. $125/hr was a half competent consultant he should at the very least have email evidence to show that he tried to change this retarded procedure but was vetoed by his superior. If he has such evidence then rinse & repeat up the PHB ladder.
      And promptly become an ex-consultant to that company...
    106. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      I love mixed metaphors. My favorite is "Does the Pope shit in the woods?"
      Offtopicly, there's a french saying for something that's not exactly abundant: "That's rare like pope's shit"...
    107. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "A consultant is basically the guy you hire to do something that needs to be done, that you don't want to hire a qualified full time employee to do."

      Well Duh! Every one of the projects you mentioned is a perfect job for a consultant. The reason they hire you in the first place is that they KNOW they cannot do it themselves (thus the mess and the good money). They also know they don't need to keep paying you forever (although I have been offered many permanent jobs AT THE SAME RATES, the last of which I took up about a year ago). Think about it, would you look for a guy who builds skyscrapers to tack a spare room on to your house, or would you pick a much cheaper local builder?

      I agree "greenfield" projects are the best but they are not as common as 10yrs ago. Whatever the project it's up to you to find a way to make it enjoyable (something I learnt in another life as a labourer/factory worker). Personally I enjoy the feeling of satisfaction that comes from "getting the job done". Maybe the project falls into a heap again after I'm gone and they get another consultant to come along and fix what the PHB claims is the mess I left, but that's more often a reflection of the PHB's skills/personality and the entrophy inherent in IT. In no way does it diminishes my personal satisfaction.

      Having said that, there are very few people who don't at sometime or another have Monday-itis.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    108. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      From my earlier post, I reject any misuse of Occam or Hanlon. I see your two razors, and raise you one of my own, which is only partly in jest: Never use a razor if you don't know how to use it safely.

      --
      I hate printers.
    109. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "And promptly become an ex-consultant to that company..."

      Welcome to world of professional software "engineering". In major projects where lives are involved you are expected to keep such records, failure to do so may land you in jail/court when the shit hits the fan. Keeping a record of of your own dissent is basic "arse covering", for something as bone-headed as the senario in TFA I would refuse to be part of it regardless of the impact on my wallet, simply put - No guts, no glory!

      BTW: It's also a good idea to put some of that good money into a "screw you" fund. Fortunately I have never had to use mine for anything more than reassurance when calling a "if you don't do X you can pick up your pink slip" bluff.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    110. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by tf23 · · Score: 1

      Actually about a year or two ago they announced they would be "scaling back those efforts". And to me, it seems they have. I don't see anywhere near as many Ohio State Troopers out on the roads staked out at speed traps, like you used to 5 years ago. You can pass most of them @75 and not be stopped. Go over that and you will.

      If they'd only up the trucker's speed limit to 65, and make everyone's minimum speed 55, I think we'd all be that much safer.

    111. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      If the thief knew what he was doing then the whole fucking car would be "recycled" before you noticed it was missing. Junkies are opportunists that grab what's fast and easy. Regardless of the true worth of the item a junkie will gladly swap it for a $50 deal.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    112. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by mojine · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they ever tried to read any of these tapes after potential degaussing ; * ... he left the data tapes * on top of his TV, so that he would remember to bring them back on the following day.

      --
      "It's not how many people I've killed - it's how I get along with the ones that are still alive."
    113. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by Monte · · Score: 1

      Here in Ohio we have these things we call "tornados". It's not at all outside the realm of possibility that Mr. F5 could pick up your data center and drop it in Lake Erie somewhere. Offsite backups *are* a good idea, but just handing a tape - an UNENCRYPTED tape! - to an intern to keep "safe" is just... well, I don't know what lies beyond dumb, "infradumb" maybe.

      Infinitely smarter and not terribly expensive (maybe $100/yr?) would be renting a safe deposit box in an bank a little ways away, and make it somebody's job to rotate the tapes in and out of that.

      That would be the smart way, but it wouldn't be the government way.

    114. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    115. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by operagost · · Score: 1

      Notice how neither graduate has any practical knowledge.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    116. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by billcopc · · Score: 1

      What kind of dumb fuck would want to recycle a rusty, dented and scratched Ford Focus ? I don't even need to lock my doors anymore, even joyriding teenagers won't touch my car (it would probably stall and seize after ten feet).

      Security through junk. It's like that SNL faux-mercial of a luxury car that looks like a pile of rust, only my car's inside is as ugly as the outside.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    117. Re:Scapegoat? Maybe, but he's still a moron. by mink · · Score: 1

      To quote the PJs.

      "Hold on now, not all of us graduated from DeVry."

      At my company, the last Devry (Columbus) intern we took) was stealing equipment and trying to sell it.

      On the other hand I know of at least 2 Devry (Columbus) CS graduates I would trust to write software that my life depends on.

      The school is a scam and students are the victims.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  2. obviously he is a idiot. by falcon5768 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I dont leave my freaking DS in the car let alone sensitive data like that. But there is plenty of blame to go around on this... in particular the fact that other than to prevent loss in the case of a fire, I cant see one legitimate reason for the tapes even leaving the site.

    Hell even in that case, why didnt they have a remote backup to prevent loss through a fire or flood.

    Yep plenty of blame to go around.

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    1. Re:obviously he is a idiot. by NeoTerra · · Score: 1

      "I was the newest person in the door so I inherited the job of taking the data tapes out of the building."

      So why, exactly, do you make the newest person take the tapes out? The background check is the newest? I'm thinking they were just a little lazy.

    2. Re:obviously he is a idiot. by secret_squirrel_99 · · Score: 1

      to prevent loss in the case of a fire, I cant see one legitimate reason for the tapes even leaving the site.

      Which is precisely why offsite copies are made. All legitimate backup schemes involve the offsite storage of tapes. Most companies contract with a company that specializes in this sort of thing, like Iron Mountain. All data centers are at risk of physical catastrophe in addition to fires. Earthquakes, tornados, floods, hurricanes, etc depending on locale. Shipping the tapes offsite is not the problem. Doing it irresponsibly is.

      why didnt they have a remote backup?

      Again for any number of reasons. Inadequate bandwidth, insufficient storage, unavailability of another suitable site etc. Remember that backups are often kept (whether for business or regulatory purposes) for many years. Tape is still the most cost effective way to do this.

      --
      If privacy had a tombstone it would read "We did it for your own good" . -- John Twelve Hawks
    3. Re:obviously he is a idiot. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Our tape rotation is as follows: All tapes in a tape safe, all Monday tapes go off site for 2 months, all quarterly tapes are stored for 2 years off site, and all yearly tapes are stored offsite for 5 years. The tapes are transported by an employee whose job is to move various papers, tapes, etc, back and forth on a daily basis.

      It's easy, sensible, reasonably secure. The offsite location is a satellite office, they have a locking tape safe in which they store the tapes. If the tapes were stolen, most of the data is not encrypted...With the exception of Credit Card Numbers, Bank Account Numbers, and Social Security Numbers.

      The system that contains this sensitive data was originally installed in 1982; it's a MPE/iX based accounting system written primarily in Cobol. A fossil, basically, but clearly superior to what Ohio uses. Maybe one day the state of Ohio will move technologically forward to the 80's.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    4. Re:obviously he is a idiot. by The+Real+Toad+King · · Score: 1

      Inadequate bandwidth, insufficient storage, unavailability of another suitable site etc.

      I don't work for any state government, but I think states have the power to overcome at least one of those issues.

    5. Re:obviously he is a idiot. by secret_squirrel_99 · · Score: 1

      Inadequate bandwidth, insufficient storage, unavailability of another suitable site etc. I don't work for any state government, but I think states have the power to overcome at least one of those issues

      Just because you CAN do something doesn't mean you should. I manage a storage environment for a major university that is currently at 500TB, I imagine many government agencies are larger. I keep backups for regulatory purposes for 7 years. Governments do as well (and probably longer) Thats ALOT of tape. Now try to imagine the size of the mirror I would need if I wanted to keep that on disk. Even to keep one cycle, where I would need a complete full and all of the incremental copies.

      COULD you provision adequate storage and bandwidth to eliminate the need for tape? Maybe.. should you? possibly if you wanted single copy of your environment (or more likely a subset of it) for rapid disaster recovery, but for general backup purposes, the answer remains no.

      --
      If privacy had a tombstone it would read "We did it for your own good" . -- John Twelve Hawks
    6. Re:obviously he is a idiot. by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      waaaaay back in the day..... I used to work part time for the IT department of a major city. Our archival systems consisted of: Weekly the mainframe backup tapes were rotated on set schedule and one set was taken offsite for safety.. That set I know of becuase... I would load the 30 or so 9 track 1600 BPI tapes (yeah that long ago) up in my Volkswagen Squareback (yeah that long ago) and drive them to a warehouse district near the tracks where in the back of a empty warehouse was a steel vault they were kept in. Encryption? You gotta be kiddin! security? I was the hippie who worked the night shift and NO ONE knew me, yet I walked in and walked out with the records on millions of people...weekly... for years...

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    7. Re:obviously he is a idiot. by jimicus · · Score: 1

      in particular the fact that other than to prevent loss in the case of a fire, I cant see one legitimate reason for the tapes even leaving the site.

      Yes. That's the whole point of taking a tape offsite - in the case of fire. (Or, indeed, any one of a number of disasters which would render the entire building room out of use - like flooding, for instance).

      What's amazing is that they weren't paying someone like Iron Mountain to take the tapes away to a secure location, or looking for a secure location in another building where the tapes could be kept.

  3. I think the bigger problem by afidel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is that 7.3% of the population is working directly for the state government! I wonder what total percentage of the population works directly and indirectly (such as the contractor) for the government at all levels?

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:I think the bigger problem by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you pay taxes you work for the government =)

    2. Re:I think the bigger problem by CheeseTroll · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you pay the gov't, isn't gov't working for you?

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    3. Re:I think the bigger problem by sholden · · Score: 2

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/artic le/2006/10/05/AR2006100501782.html - 14.6 million federal
      http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=18746 - 15.8 million state and local

      So over 10%. Which probably doesn't include state and local contractors. Or the industrial part of the "military-industrial complex"...

    4. Re:I think the bigger problem by Mornelithe · · Score: 1

      Do you say this based on the assumption that the numbers stolen were those of employees? They were not necessarily.

      For instance, I got a letter that my number was stolen, because I (apparently) was on a list of people who hadn't cashed their tax return check by some date or another. I don't work for the Ohio state government, though.

      The article says that 770,000 of the numbers were from tax payers, and 64,000 were from state employees.

      --

      I've come for the woman, and your head.

    5. Re:I think the bigger problem by DrLudicrous · · Score: 1

      No, they are general population. For instance, if you hadn't cashed your state tax refund, your name and SSN was on the backup.

    6. Re:I think the bigger problem by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      When the idiot Ted Strickland took office one the items that the previous administration was working on was implementing a security policy for sensitive data. Ted decided to not continue this action, and now my Identity will be stolen because I worked for a state school 4 years ago. The best part of it all is the notice they sent me which stated that my SS# was stolen and they offered to give me 1 year of credit protection, because who ever has the disk would need to know how their program works in order to see my SS#. Whew I'm relieved that my SS# is not stored in ASCII no way could anyone be able to read an unsigned long they might have to choose between big-endian and little-endian.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    7. Re:I think the bigger problem by gskouby · · Score: 1

      I don't know if it was in the PDF so i can't say RTFPDF but it wasn't only information about govt employees. Information about people who hadn't cashed state tax refund checks as well as welfare receipients, just to name a few, were also on the tape.

    8. Re:I think the bigger problem by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It depends if you believe the government is working towards your interests or not. Since paying taxes is not optional, I'm sure most people would agree that they do not.

    9. Re:I think the bigger problem by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      Seems like it ought to, but that clearly isn't the case.

      -Peter

    10. Re:I think the bigger problem by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      The government works for whatever they are governing. The state, city, country whatever, if you fall into that catagory then you do. But you pay the government for the state, city whatever that they work for not to work for you.

      This is a misconception people have placed out there. The government's interest might not be your interests and they are not interconnected unless circumstances allow them to be.The government works for the state, city, country, county or whatever that are governing. They look out for it's interest first.

    11. Re:I think the bigger problem by lawpoop · · Score: 1
      This is the problem with all of our modern technology and labor-saving devices. If we can do in a day what used to take a week, such as harvest a field, that means we have a hell of a lot of free-time on our hands. We have a couple of ways to deal with it:
      • Let people enjoy their free time. We could make the work-week something like 30-35 hours, and not expect to have the latest car, fastest computer, or bigger and bigger houses. The problem is that this creates a welfare state and re-distribution of wealth. You could argue that state employees are part of a welfare system.
      • Create make-work, such as the entertainment industry A lot of the private 'industry' we have nowadays is not 'real' work. We don't need movies or CDs -- stories and singalongs have filled the role for thousands of years. A Hollywood movie, or the tire-rim industry, are just ways to use up the extra labor of people who aren't working in the fields anymore.
      • Create a prison society. You can use up a lot of the extra labor by creating a lot of laws ( drug laws, driving while black ). Lock up a significant portion of the population, say, 10% of black youth, and use up some extra labor policing and imprisoning the new criminal population.
      You can also do a combination of the above. There are also probably other ways to use up spare labor, this is just what I could think of off the top of my head.
      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    12. Re:I think the bigger problem by mollymoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I find it amazing that the prevalent attitude in the USA seems to be, simultaneously, that theirs is the greatest democracy in the world and that their government(s) work(s) in opposition to the people.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    13. Re:I think the bigger problem by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      Just think about the wizarding world! 90% of wizards and witches work for the Ministry of Magic! The other 10% work at Diagon Alley, Hogsmeade, or rustle Dragons in Romania.

    14. Re:I think the bigger problem by Stiletto · · Score: 1

      Not so amazing. Voters are irrational, and, again and again, elect people who operate against their (the voters') interests. Mostly because they are told by the TV that the politicians who WOULD work for their interests are unelectable.

    15. Re:I think the bigger problem by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      "It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried."

              Sir Winston Churchill

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    16. Re:I think the bigger problem by juan2074 · · Score: 1

      Too bad Churchill was wrong.

      A monarchy can be the best form of government.

      Unfortunately, that can change in a single day.

      A monarchy can be the worst form of government.

    17. Re:I think the bigger problem by xsadar · · Score: 1

      That just stems from the fact that the people NEVER come to a consensus. Therefore, the government is working in direct opposition to a portion of the people 100% of the time. (Note that they are also working FOR a portion of the people 100% of the time, but as people naturally tend to be critical this tends to go unnoticed.) Also, in a democracy you can count on portions of the government to work directly against other portions of the government the vast majority of the time, and as a result, 100% of the people have some portion of the government working against them the vast majority of the time. For instance, the democrats are trying to force a deadline for an Iraq pullout, while the republicans are trying to prevent a deadline. The result: those who want a deadline say the republicans are working against them and those who don't want it say the democrats are working against them. So everybody says on that issue that the government is working against them, because some portion of the government is.

      --
      The only thing I know is that I don't know anything; and I'm not even sure about that.
    18. Re:I think the bigger problem by anticypher · · Score: 1

      7.3% of the population is working directly for the state government!

      Quoi? Ohio est maintenant dans France? Ils suivent la modele de la France? Ca reste toujours une espoir pour les americains

      the AC

      --
      Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
    19. Re:I think the bigger problem by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

      You say that a "government works for whatever they are governing." What *are* they governing, if not the *people* within their designated area?

      I'm not under the illusion that I must always agree with my government's decisions, nor they with mine. And compared to a business employer/employee relationship, we don't get as much flexibility in which government 'works for' us. But (in a democracy, at least), the theory that a government is for/by/of the people still holds true.

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    20. Re:I think the bigger problem by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      You say that a "government works for whatever they are governing." What *are* they governing, if not the *people* within their designated area?

      They are governing the designated area. the county, state, city, country, whatever the area is that they are governing. Sometimes this falls in line with the people in the area and sometimes it doesn't. Their priority is the designated area first because it will benefit the people in the area.

      I'm not under the illusion that I must always agree with my government's decisions, nor they with mine. And compared to a business employer/employee relationship, we don't get as much flexibility in which government 'works for' us. But (in a democracy, at least), the theory that a government is for/by/of the people still holds true.

      Well, In our system we are a republic and not necessarily a democracy. We elect people to make decisions for us in much the same way your parents told you to wear a coat when it cold out and you were 7. I'm not saying that the government should be acting like your dad but they should be able to ignore what you want if there is a greater good in it. When someone is elected to office, they are charged with running their seat in the way it effects the designated area not you. Now by association, you fall into that designated area and can benefit from their decisions or not, but that isn't what is on their agenda or should directly be when making the decision. Thats not to say a decision couldn't directly benefit you or make condition so bad the benefiting you seems to be the best for the area.

      Take something like global trade and free trade. Sure, your jobs might leave to another country and you would have to find another source of income. But products come back into the area cheaper then before and you can afford to live in the area. With free trade, we get to seel some stuff over there and bring in global companies too. When they worked that out, their concern was more to how we will benefit the area then who will lose their jobs. I know that is a loaded subject and many people have many different positions on it so I'm not going into whether it was a right decision or a wrong decision. I'm just saying it was a decision that illustrates this principle.

      "For, by, and of the people" has been taken out of context. It doesn't describe locals getting in office to enrich themselves and people like them. It is supposed to mean that the people living in the designated area have some say in the outcome of the designated area. That it is governed by the people from that area who are effected by the policy so they can make that area the best (ideologically speaking) they can so the people of the area can do the best they can. It doesn't mean always shaping policy to directly benefit each citizens. It allows for the ability to shape policy and laws to indirectly benefit the citizens as a whole by focusing on the needs of the designated area more then the wants of specific people.

      You see this every day in laws and policy that don't effect you and never cross your mind. Yet, because of something that was needed in the area, it happened. As I said, sometimes you fall into the fields they are addressing and sometimes you don't. But their responsibility is to the designated area beyond what you can gain a benefit from.

      I hope I haven't made you more confused. Political ideology has some different takes on this too. But think about it. If you let the people decide everything what do you end up with? There are all kinds of examples I could give, and with a lose definition of the problems I could point out that giving the people what they wanted ended up being bad for the people. Flint Michigan, The Ghettos and the Projects and everything else that turns into a chicken and egg scenario are good examples to start with (although mass government housing has some other issues to start with). Of course there are examples of where it worked out just fine, but what do

    21. Re:I think the bigger problem by Obsidian+Butterfly · · Score: 1

      But in Soviet Russia, when you pay taxes the govt. works for you!

    22. Re:I think the bigger problem by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1
      It does not follow that the gov't is working for a portion of the people 100% of the time, if you exclude people in gov't from "a portion of the people". There are many obvious cases (particularly undeserved pay raises) where the gov't is working only for itself, AGAINST everyone else.

      Furthermore, most of the time the net long-term effect of government action hurts everyone.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  4. prime suspect by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Three months into his $10.50-an-hour internship, he left the tapes in his car overnight -- unencrypted -- and they were stolen, and his 1990 Yugo mysteriously replaced with a new Ferrari."

    1. Re:prime suspect by Silverhammer · · Score: 1

      The parent said:

      "Three months into his $10.50-an-hour internship, he left the tapes in his car overnight -- unencrypted -- and they were stolen, and his 1990 Yugo mysteriously replaced with a new Ferrari."

      Who the hell would buy a Ferrari with gas prices the way they are?

    2. Re:prime suspect by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      I pay about $2 a litre. or about $7.5 per us gallon.

      What do you pay?

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    3. Re:prime suspect by bjackson1 · · Score: 1

      Who the hell would buy a Ferrari with gas prices the way they are?
      Someone who can afford a Ferrari?
    4. Re:prime suspect by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      If I can afford a Ferrari (and the accompanying maintenance), who cares what gas costs?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  5. Uh-oh. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 5, Funny

    After all these years, they've finally found a security hole in the Sneakernet.

    1. Re:Uh-oh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sneakernet is notoriously vulnerable to brute-force man-in-the-middle attacks. :)

  6. Didn't anyone think by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 1

    "Maybe my social security number is on these tapes?"
    Would they have handled it any differently if it was?

    1. Re:Didn't anyone think by Kamokazi · · Score: 1

      They sent you a mail notification if your name was on the list. Myself, my mother, and my brother were all on that list (Maybe it was regional?). They are offering a free year of credit monitoring, which is a nice gesture, but a nuisance, because before any of us can be approved for credit, they have to call and confirm it with us. The bad thing about this is, half the places you apply for credit (retail stores and whatnot) have overly simplstic systems that apparently aren't capable of handling exceptions, so the credit just gets denied.

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    2. Re:Didn't anyone think by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      There is a rumor that the credit monitoring was only at one place that has ties to Strickland's campaign. The rumor goes that the tape was never lost is was just said that it was lost in order to give this company and the founder the business. And when the police got involved, it went further then they wanted it to go.

      I think that sounds just as plausible as all the other conspiracy theories out there which means there is a low chance of it being true. But it is something to think about.

    3. Re:Didn't anyone think by Kamokazi · · Score: 1

      Hmm...at least Taft waited for his second term for his scandals...

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    4. Re:Didn't anyone think by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      The tapes had state employee SSN's on them; weren't the consultant's and the intern's on there too?

    5. Re:Didn't anyone think by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      I do like that story. Which company was it offering the monitoring? There are only three that do credit reports. A lot more do "monitoring," but I don't believe the relevant identity theft legislation requires that a victim gets free "monitoring."

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  7. Stolen SSNs by NeoTerra · · Score: 1

    Ok, I know that keeping data off-site is a good thing, but do you hand an intern your backups and send him home with the tapes? I think they REALLY need to redo their backup plan. Especially if it involves THAT MUCH personal data.

    1. Re:Stolen SSNs by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      This is exactly the reason my company manufactures and sells backup appliances that 1: use disk not tape, 2: offer real time encryption of selective servers, and most importantly 3: offers electronic off site data replication using packet encryption (whether or not the data encryption module is installed). Archives only need to be run weekly or monthly, not daily, so no one is porting disks or tapes back and forth. Any data leaving the unit goes from here to there (typically a secure location), and typically never back again. 30-90 days of data are on site, live and restoreable, in the unit at all times so you can restore data from weeks ago without going to get archives at all. The unit supports about 20 different OS and has integrated BareMetal and support for Exchange, SQL, Group wise and more. No client licenses to buy, only the backup unit itself, and we undercut solution costs from Symantec and CA typically by 50%.

      We did a live demo of our box to a big company, and while in the middle of the presentation, someone walked by the conference room wearing an Iron Mountain shirt, had security let him into the server room, filled a case with tapes, and walked out of the building without so much as a second glance. We asked "does anyone know who that was?" and we got a room full of blank stares. When we asked "were those tapes encrypted" someone said "well, we bought an encryption module, but we haven't gotten it working yet. It's too slow to back up our SAN box reliably."

      Do you know how easy it is to find a company that uses Iron Mountain, figure out their rotational schedule, and then buy a shirt from ebay and walk in to steal tapes like this? A month or so of surveillance and a good story about leaving your clipboard at another site across town should be good enough to get you past just about any front desk security guard. Worse, if you've got a secretary or intern moving tapes for you you're just asking to get robbed. However, it's far more likely for the theft to be internal. Many IT people are willing to accept a few thousand to "loose" a few tapes. Unless their bar coded, he can do this without anyone even knowing their missing by substituting other tapes back into the rotation.

      Check out Unitrends.com and ask questions if this sounds too good to be true. If you're serious, someone can hook you up with a reseller near you to demonstrate the product.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
  8. Bring these back tomorrow? by vigmeister · · Score: 1

    What kind of job asks you to take backup tapes w/ sensitive information home with you? Don't they have a cabinet or a drawer inside the building (which is itself presumably safer)?

    Cheers!

    --
    Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
    1. Re:Bring these back tomorrow? by coren2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I assume they remove backups from the site nightly, in case of fire.

    2. Re:Bring these back tomorrow? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Why not just have two data centres and pipe the new records via a SSL or VPN tunnel?

      Wouldn't that make a lot more sense and be a hell of a lot safer?

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    3. Re:Bring these back tomorrow? by n1ckml007 · · Score: 1

      This is an inexpensive way to do off-site backup, as noted in TFA the data should have been encrypted.

    4. Re:Bring these back tomorrow? by coren2000 · · Score: 1

      This is the government we are talking about right?

    5. Re:Bring these back tomorrow? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Eh. One of the things you have to take into account for a real backup system is the possibility of fraud or slow sabotage.

      Al plants a worm that screws up a couple hundred entries each day, and it doesn't get caught for 2 months. How do you restore when your only backup is "yesterday"?

      Bob steals $1,000,000 over the course of two years, rewrites the accounts to show a $1,000,000 loss to account for the money, and walks. How do you find which accounts he changed?

      You could very easily end up with two corrupted datasets and no way of reconstructing the actual data. The only time I've ever seen that type of backup used exclusively is when people are subcontracting out their backup plan, and the people they're subcontracting to always have some way of dumping to removable media.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    6. Re:Bring these back tomorrow? by varmittang · · Score: 1

      Thats when you purchase a fireproof safe, and store tapes on site. But any ways, any IT person knows you just don't leave tapes laying around. They always go in a safe place that can be locked, and a car is not a safe place because it can be easily broken into. He learned his lesson. Just to bad no one told him before hand which would have safe a lot of time.

      --
      -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
      12345
      -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    7. Re:Bring these back tomorrow? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's called offsite storage. If you aren't doing it, look into it or you will regret not doing so if your building ever burns down, floods, etc.

      They just did it in a horribly horribly bad way. There are lots of other state buildings around they could transfer things to regularly. Having anyone, let alone an intern, take them to their home instead is simply stupid. As is leaving company property unattended in your car. Having them do that with unencrypted data was just batshit insane.

    8. Re:Bring these back tomorrow? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Presumably if you had access to the records, you had access to the backups. So it's kinda a moot point. I get what you're saying. This is like the argument of "backup vs. raid-1". And it makes sense.

      However, there is no reason why the 2nd data centre has to only have live data. Why couldn't it store deltas as well?

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    9. Re:Bring these back tomorrow? by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Who is going to pay for it? At one of my jobs, I had to beg my boss for a tape drive and a box of blank tapes, in order to backup our systems. In many organizations, there is a very limited budget for buying hardware, and it can take forever to get a procurement request approved, funded, and executed. Off-site backup was me taking tapes home for safekeeping. I have a lot of sympathy for the intern. Many managers don't care about disaster recovery and refuse to spend any resources on it.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    10. Re:Bring these back tomorrow? by joto · · Score: 1

      What kind of job asks you to take backup tapes w/ sensitive information home with you?

      It's not actually a job. It's just an internship.

  9. Small mistake in title... by cbrichar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Intern Loses 800,000 Social Security Numbers, 1 Internship

    Fixed it for you.

  10. 7.3%- Sounds about right by DrLudicrous · · Score: 2, Insightful

    7.3% sounds right. I know of several people affected by this- but rest assured, the great state of Ohio is promising one full year of ID theft protection. Bet that makes those folks sleep better at night. One friend that got a letter informing him of his SSN being stolen was told why- he was one of many Ohio taxpayers who has not yet cashed their state tax refund, and as a result, was kept in a database on the stolen tapes. As the Prentenders said, "Way to go Ohio!"

    1. Re:7.3%- Sounds about right by courtarro · · Score: 2, Funny

      Slashdot headline, July 27, 2008: "800,000 identities stolen in Ohio"

    2. Re:7.3%- Sounds about right by jimicus · · Score: 1

      What on Earth is "ID Theft Protection" anyway?

      It's not like it's easy to recover from the repercussions if your identity is stolen in such a case.

  11. everyone BUT the intern should be fired by uncleFester · · Score: 4, Insightful

    heh.. getting fired for doing what your boss told you to do.. it's the new trend in corporate america!

    i get told now and then to do something not quite above board.. so i send the requester an email asking them to state in explicit detail what they want so i can be clear (and also have a record/trail). most times, the request is not repeated. doesn't make me terribly popular, but i sure as hell am not going to get tossed for another person's bad (or illegal?) request.

    i kinda feel bad for the intern.. kinda like a falsely-accused criminal. this will probably follow him around a while and it was little or no fault of his own..

    -r (has NO problem believing the intern's story 100%)

    --
    -'fester
    1. Re:everyone BUT the intern should be fired by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Yeah for an intern working for the government (effectively) CYA should have been job one (why do you think bureaucracies are so inefficient). That intern must have skipped the day the lesson was taught.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    2. Re:everyone BUT the intern should be fired by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      He was told to take the tapes HOME, not take the tapes and leave them in his car overnight. He certainly deserves to be fired, as does everyone else.

    3. Re:everyone BUT the intern should be fired by Thyamine · · Score: 1

      Actually who knows what he was told. He was told to take them home, but someone could have just as easily told him afterwards that he can just leave them in the car because he just needs to get them off-site. I've seen plenty of engineers leave computers, servers, laptops, etc in cars because you always figure it's not going to happen to you, and most of the time they're right. It's that one time you're wrong and lose 800,000 SSNs that comes back to bite you in the ass.

      I want to know why someone felt that something so critical could be taken care of by the intern. I've been to several clients where the president of the company, or the CIO if they're big enough, takes home a tape 'just in case'.

      --
      I will shred my adversaries. Pull their eyes out just enough to turn them towards their mewing, mutilated faces. Illyria
    4. Re:everyone BUT the intern should be fired by gigne · · Score: 1

      So how would this have played out if the intern had done as he was told, his house had been broken into, and the tapes stolen? My guess is his neck would still be in that noose. He looked to be in a lose/lose situation.

      --
      Signature v3.0, now with 42% less memory usage.
    5. Re:everyone BUT the intern should be fired by Minwee · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, I think that he very definitely was there the day that lesson was taught. It was the morning after he took a set of backup tapes home.

    6. Re:everyone BUT the intern should be fired by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be a loose noose situation? ;)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    7. Re:everyone BUT the intern should be fired by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      A car is much more likely to be broken into than a home. However, had he done as he was told, I wouldn't find any fault with what he did. He did exactly as he was asked.

      He didn't do exactly what he was asked, which was take reasonable care to ensure the safety of the tapes. Leaving them in the car not only opens them to being stolen, but, depending on weather conditions, could harm the tapes. Keeping them in his apartment is reasonable because its unlikely someone would break in during the night when most apartment residents are home. Also, unless he stored them in the oven or was careless with fire, there is nothing more reasonable he could do to prevent his building from burning down.

    8. Re:everyone BUT the intern should be fired by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      My insurance considers my car parked in the street in front of my house to be exactly the same as if it were parked inside my locked garage (or even parked in the living room). He took them home, but did not take them inside his home. But, pedanrty aside, his instructions were not explicitly stated. "Take them home with you" means toss them in the car and leave them there. The point was to get them off-site. If they wanted them secure, they'd have provided him with a safe to go in his house. Since they didn't, it was obvious it was a disaster plan (having them away from the office was the sole goal, which he did achieve), and not a security plan.

    9. Re:everyone BUT the intern should be fired by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      i get told now and then to do something not quite above board.. so i send the requester an email asking them to state in explicit detail what they want so i can be clear (and also have a record/trail). most times, the request is not repeated. doesn't make me terribly popular, but i sure as hell am not going to get tossed for another person's bad (or illegal?) request.


      While reading about the right to refuse an illegal direct order in the military, I heard that this was pretty much the suggested procedure.

      1) Receive order, which you believe is illegal.
      2) Ask for direct and explicit confirmation of that order exactly as you see it.
      3) If the order is repeated and is still as far as you can tell, illegal, refuse the order on grounds that it is illegal.
      4) (Not officially part of the policy) If the superior informs you that he'll kill you for not following a direct order, follow the order anyways.

      This can be kind of shown best by an example, "Seargent, break into that store and grab supplies." "Sir, are you ordering me to illegally break into a private business and steal supplies?" "Yes, Seargent, that's exactly what I'm telling you to do." "Sir, I believe that to be an illegal order, and I do not have to follow it." (Typical result: "Seargent, you will carry out my orders or I will shoot you for insubordination!" "Sir, I don't think the illegal order is worth my life, I will comply.")

      Of course, there are good illegal orders to continue to refuse to follow. "Seargent, kill that man!" "Sir, are you asking me to execute a Prisoner of War who is safely in custody?" "Yes, Seargent, that's exactly what I'm telling you to do." "Sir, I believe that to be an illegal order, and I do not have to follow it." "Seargeant, you will carry out my orders or I will shoot you for insubordination!" "Sir, my stance on this issue is clear, I will not follow a direct command to commit murder, and violate the Geneva Convention." *BAM* Seargent is dead, but at least he died innocent, and it's now the officer's issue to deal with.
      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    10. Re:everyone BUT the intern should be fired by mpe · · Score: 1

      It's that one time you're wrong and lose 800,000 SSNs that comes back to bite you in the ass.

      Remembering that if these SSNs were only being used for their intended purpose in the first place there probably wouldn't be a big problem.

    11. Re:everyone BUT the intern should be fired by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


      now and then...i send the requester and email asking them to state in explicit detail what they want

      Now and then? That's standard practice everywhere I've worked in the last 6 years. You should make it a regular habit, as should everyone else. What's weirder are the times you get a phone call response to an emailed question precisely to take it "off the record." That kinda opened my eyes the first time it was done to me.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    12. Re:everyone BUT the intern should be fired by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Of course, there are good illegal orders to continue to refuse to follow. "Seargent, kill that man!" "Sir, are you asking me to execute a Prisoner of War who is safely in custody?" "Yes, Seargent, that's exactly what I'm telling you to do."

      At which point you gank your CO, I suppose. I remember that happened from time to time in the Vietnam police action.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    13. Re:everyone BUT the intern should be fired by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      My insurance considers my car parked in the street in front of my house to be exactly the same as if it were parked inside my locked garage (or even parked in the living room).

      Well, one of two things. Your insurance company wants to screw you just the same, or they realize that you will sometimes not park your car in the garage everytime.

      He took them home, but did not take them inside his home. But, pedanrty aside, his instructions were not explicitly stated. "Take them home with you" means toss them in the car and leave them there. The point was to get them off-site. If they wanted them secure, they'd have provided him with a safe to go in his house. Since they didn't, it was obvious it was a disaster plan (having them away from the office was the sole goal, which he did achieve), and not a security plan.

      I don't buy into lawyer speak, I belive in common sense. If you want to be technical, the parking lot outside the building he lives is not his home, nor are any of the other units. Only one unit can be considered his home; he doesn't sleep in the laundry room does he?

      I think it also logically follows that if they want the tapes safe from destruction, in which case they lose the backup should it be needed, that they'd also want it safe from theft, in which case they'd lose the backup should it be needed. So either situtation causes the same result, except theft has another wonderful side effect.

      When you have someone else's property, for whatever reason, you must take reasonable precautions to ensure the properties safety. That's exactly what a judge would say. Leaving something value in a car in an apartment complex parking lot is not reasonable care.

    14. Re:everyone BUT the intern should be fired by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Well, one of two things. Your insurance company wants to screw you just the same, or they realize that you will sometimes not park your car in the garage everytime.

      Homeowners insurance covers what happens on your property. "Your home" includes not just the structure, but the land and those things reasonable associated with the property (a car parked on the street in front of your house can be the same as if you had the car locked up in the basement. Why talk about homeowners insurance for a car? Homeowners insurance covers items taken from a car broken into while at the home. Well, at least mine does and I think it standard practice, but you should check yours if you are worried about coverage.

      If you want to be technical, the parking lot outside the building he lives is not his home, nor are any of the other units. Only one unit can be considered his home; he doesn't sleep in the laundry room does he?

      He uses the whole complex as if it is his. He parks his car in a spot available to him, does his laundry in a room provided for his use. They may be common areas, but they are still his home. It's no different than if you rented a house with a roomate. His room might not be your room, but both rooms are in the home of the other. Just because you aren't the only one with exclusive use doesn't mean it can't be part of your home.

      I think it also logically follows that if they want the tapes safe from destruction, in which case they lose the backup should it be needed, that they'd also want it safe from theft, in which case they'd lose the backup should it be needed. So either situtation causes the same result, except theft has another wonderful side effect.

      You are correct. The procedure was bad. He followed the procedure and took the care that the procedure indicated (just get them off site). Any failures are not on the part of the intern. If they wanted to have someone with responsibility take care of them, they wouldn't have the procedure of giving them to the least competent person in the company.

      When you have someone else's property, for whatever reason, you must take reasonable precautions to ensure the properties safety. That's exactly what a judge would say. Leaving something value in a car in an apartment complex parking lot is not reasonable care.

      Well you aren't a judge. And I don't expect my car to be broken into. I'm curious where you live where you expect your car to be broken into. Regardless, the whole thing would be moot if the tapes were properly encrypted. And why would you think that an apartment where multiple non-residents have the keys to get in is somehow secure? If you assert that sitting in a car is insecure, I will assert that laying on the kitchen counter is insecure. Since he lives in such a high crime area with break-ins and the tapes aren't secure in the car or his apartment, where could he have put them? For security, locking them in his desk would have been the best idea, but he didn't take them for security reasons. He took them to get them out of the building, and the did his job as instructed.

    15. Re:everyone BUT the intern should be fired by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Homeowners insurance covers what happens on your property. "Your home" includes not just the structure, but the land and those things reasonable associated with the property (a car parked on the street in front of your house can be the same as if you had the car locked up in the basement. Why talk about homeowners insurance for a car? Homeowners insurance covers items taken from a car broken into while at the home. Well, at least mine does and I think it standard practice, but you should check yours if you are worried about coverage.

      I thought we were talking about auto insurance.

      He uses the whole complex as if it is his. He parks his car in a spot available to him, does his laundry in a room provided for his use. They may be common areas, but they are still his home. It's no different than if you rented a house with a roomate. His room might not be your room, but both rooms are in the home of the other. Just because you aren't the only one with exclusive use doesn't mean it can't be part of your home.

      The common areas in most complexes may as well be considered public. In essence, he left the tapes lying around in a public area. Its not the same as a roommate, because with a roommate you only expect you roommate and those he trusts to also have access.. you don't expect the public at large to have access.

      You are correct. The procedure was bad. He followed the procedure and took the care that the procedure indicated (just get them off site). Any failures are not on the part of the intern. If they wanted to have someone with responsibility take care of them, they wouldn't have the procedure of giving them to the least competent person in the company.

      So leaving the tapes hidden on a shelf in a grocery store would be following procedure for him?

      Well you aren't a judge. And I don't expect my car to be broken into. I'm curious where you live where you expect your car to be broken into.

      It doesn't matter where I live, I always lock my car doors. Likewise, I would not leave something valueable in my car at an apartment complex either.

      Regardless, the whole thing would be moot if the tapes were properly encrypted.

      The whole thing would have been moot as well had he brought the tapes into his unit. He had a part to play in this as well, and its not an excuse for him to simply say the policy sucked. Obviously had he taken the tapes in, there'd be no issue still. Therefore he shares part of the blame.

      And why would you think that an apartment where multiple non-residents have the keys to get in is somehow secure? If you assert that sitting in a car is insecure, I will assert that laying on the kitchen counter is insecure. Since he lives in such a high crime area with break-ins and the tapes aren't secure in the car or his apartment, where could he have put them?

      You've never lived in an apartment complex have you? Breakins to autos at complexes are much more common than single family homes. The lot may or may not be nearby to the owners of the cars. On the flip side, the building itself is usually more secure. There are more people around in the complex, and someone would more likely notice a person breaking into an apartment than someone would in the parking lot. The tapes would be *more* secure in his apartment than his car. Also, the effort needed to make the tapes moer secure was minimal. That is, its reasonable to expect him to bring the tapes into his actual unit and not leave them in the car.

      For security, locking them in his desk would have been the best idea, but he didn't take them for security reasons. He took them to get them out of the building, and the did his job as instructed.

      Its implied that he should not allow them to be stolen, would you agree? Would you also agree the tapes would have been *more* secure in his apartment than his car (especially given that it was his car and not his apartment that was broken into)? If you trust your property to another, you don't need to explicitly tell them "make sure no one steals this." Its reasonable to expect that. Its also reasonable to expect that he didn't toss them into his dishwasher.

    16. Re:everyone BUT the intern should be fired by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The whole thing would have been moot as well had he brought the tapes into his unit.

      Bullshit. What if he took them in and his home was broken into? The whole thing would have been exactly the same as it is now. Some company would have send unencrypted backups to an unsecure site with the least competent employee, as a matter of policy.

    17. Re:everyone BUT the intern should be fired by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Except that's not what happened is it? No apartments in his complex were broken into at the same time. As I said, the unit is *more* secure than the car, and the fact that cars get broken into more than apartments would back up that assertion.

  12. Don't worry! by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    I found them!

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  13. Thanks a Lot Genius by nuintari · · Score: 1

    My girlfriend was one of the number's stolen, the state has graciously offered to buy her a year of ID protection. Cause yeah, after a year, this problem goes away. She is going to have to pay for the service for years after this, just for peace of mind. Thanks you so much, we didn't need this stress. You know how much beer I can buy with a year's worth of ID theft prevention? Enough to get me drunk _several_ times buddy, yeah, you are killing my buzz already!

    You know what they say, "if an intern triples your workload, consider yourself lucky."

    --

    --Nuintari

    slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

    1. Re:Thanks a Lot Genius by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Could always apply for a new SSN, credit card, etc...?

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Thanks a Lot Genius by nuintari · · Score: 1

      We are looking into that, I think the state should front all the cash to pay for that pile of horse shit.

      --

      --Nuintari

      slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

    3. Re:Thanks a Lot Genius by sayfawa · · Score: 1

      Look on the bright side. If you go through a nasty breakup you'll know exactly how to get back at her while someone else gets the blame.

      --
      Free the Quark 3 from asymptotic confinement! Bring your charm! Don't get down! All colours and flavours welcome!
    4. Re:Thanks a Lot Genius by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Agreed. The state should be liable for repairing the damage, and, oh, I dunno, not leave plaintext sitting in cars?

      In all honesty, the info should never leave the building in plaintext form such that someone can easily just steal it. It should be encrypted and fed over the net in properly setup VPN or SSL tunnels.

      But that requires that the $150/hr tech they hired to setup the system KNOW WHAT THE FUCK THEY ARE DOING.

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  14. Makes sense not to report for a bit by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It makes sense not to report the loss for a while. 5 cars were broken into that night, and the thieves certainly grabbed anything that looked half valuable. They most likely had no idea that the tapes contained potentially valuable information, and almost without any doubt had no means to actually read the data.

    If a news report came out the next day "20,000 SSNs stolen" then they would know what they had, and try to find a buyer. Otherwise the tapes would likely have been trashed so the criminals wouldn't have incriminating evidence sitting around their house.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Makes sense not to report for a bit by n1ckml007 · · Score: 1

      There's a balance here, if you wait too long to disclose, you're not giving the owners of the Social Security #'s a chance to protect themselves. Also, the state may have a law on the books about disclosure time requirements.

    2. Re:Makes sense not to report for a bit by hellfire · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That makes no sense. You report the loss to the police, and then you ask/suggest them to keep it under wraps because of the sensitive nature of the data in the hopes the criminals don't know what they have. You are also doing a disservice to the people's information that was stolen, because what if the criminals DID know what they had and DID have a way to read the data?

      That's like not reporting your car stolen and just hoping it will turn up somewhere unscathed because it was a 1989 honda. Sure, it's not worth much to anyone but you, but not letting the police do their job is plain stupid.

      --

      "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    3. Re:Makes sense not to report for a bit by horatio · · Score: 1

      I live in Columbus, and this was all over the place - I don't even watch the local news. You'd have to be living under a rock not to know what happened. So stuff about not wanting the criminals to know what they had, or trying to determine what was on the tapes, etc is CYA bull.

      The local TV station had quotes from this dope talking about how he had done this (left the tapes in his car) before and when he brought them inside he said he just threw them on top of his TV(*). As an Ohio resident and a geek, I say he should be fired. From what I understand the governor's office gave him a chance to resign, and he refused. So now he has "fired" on his resume. That is brilliant. Obviously he has something to do with IT, so he should know better than to leave any valuable equipment in his car. If the tapes didn't get stolen, then you still have a serious risk of damage from 140F+ temperatures inside the car. This is a major duh. Stuff is stolen out of cars often around here. Living in and around the campus area I've had 3 incidents of vehicle contents theft (one time all they got was a handful of pennies), and one grand theft auto. No one is shocked this guy's car was broken into.

      I also say his boss and the next boss up should also have been fired (AFAIK one has already resigned) - in part to send a message that this is totally unacceptable. There have been several cases recently involving Ohio agencies including Ohio State Univ (one involving the unit I work for, grr) and Ohio University. I would have expected that someone would have gotten a clue from the "smaller" thefts and done something proactive.

      (*) Sorry, I can't seem to find the article with his quotes about the TV at the moment.

      --
      There is very little future in being right when your boss is wrong.
    4. Re:Makes sense not to report for a bit by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      What exactly are the police going to do? Start raiding random people's homes looking for the tapes? Perhaps notifying the FBI, since it is a federal crime involving federal information, would be appropriate. They could start watching various channels to see if the information comes up for sale, and they are used to operating covertly.

      But, I still say don't tell the police. Or at most, give them a blank tape and tell them some of these were stolen too, but they weren't very important.

      Dan East

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    5. Re:Makes sense not to report for a bit by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1
      "Otherwise the tapes would likely have been trashed so the criminals wouldn't have incriminating evidence sitting around their house."

      My experience with "The Criminal Element" leads me to believe these tapes are right now being used to prop up an old couch or two, and will be found in the eventual meth-warrant fun fest. These people have no idea what they have, how to use it, or who to sell it to.

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
    6. Re:Makes sense not to report for a bit by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      It makes sense not to report the loss for a while.

      I've wondered if they considered not reporting it stolen at all. I have a feeling they did, and, at least for their needs, that would have been the right choice.

      Once the tape was reported stolen, newspapers hounded the intern--the Columbus Dispatch reported on his identity and even his facebook status. Undoubtedly he's become a scapegoat.

      As far as I'm concerned, the lesson I took from the media jumping all over the guy was that if something similar happened again, you should just sweep it under the table and let the others be damned.

    7. Re:Makes sense not to report for a bit by d2d · · Score: 1

      Makes sense for a very little while, perhaps, and is legally permissible in most states to wait a short while if an investigation requires it, but after that you have to warn people.

      Losses like this are a CONSTANT occurrence. See http://etiolated.org/ http://www.privacyrights.org/ar/ChronDataBreaches. htm, and http://attrition.org/dataloss. This stuff happens almost every single day. From etiolated: 76,357,930 records lost this year! A rate of over 7 incidents per week.

      At least Ohio has been open about it. Companies like IBM, Disney, Johnson & Johnson have had breaches of potentially greater magnitude this year and haven't been a fraction as honest about it : http://attrition.org/security/rant/z/partialtruths .html (shameless self promotion of my rant, but worth a read)

      I track this stuff as a hobby, and while Ohio is big...it aint that big in the scheme of things (and they are being somewhat up front about the whole thing).
  15. It gets better...er, funnier at least by gskouby · · Score: 5, Informative

    The State of Ohio is offering one year of identity theft protection to those affected. To lookup your access code for this one free year of ID theft prevention please visit this page:

    http://ohio.gov/idprotect/lookup/lookup.aspx/

    On this page you enter your last name and the last four of your SSN. Anybody see anything fishy about this page? HOW ABOUT THAT IT ISN'T USING SSL. Apparently they don't believe in using encryption anywhere, ever. Not on backup tapes and definately not when transmitting sensitive information over the Internet.

    1. Re:It gets better...er, funnier at least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Typing common names and random numbers into that site got me a hit on only the second try! I have (or rather, Mr Smith has) been assigned an activation PIN and given a toll-free phone number to dial(although I doubt it would be free from the part of the world I'm living in).

      What's the betting I can bluff through the rest of the security checks and get some free money?

    2. Re:It gets better...er, funnier at least by TheLink · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Heh, I tried smith, 1234 and got:
      Your assigned activation PIN (personal identity number) is 7655616

      smith, 1235 = nada
      smith, 1236 = 8966764

      Then, I tried:
      %, 1236 = 3738028

      smit%, 1234 = 7655616
      smit, 1234 = 7655616
      smoth, 1234 = nada
      sm_th, 1234 = 7655616 :)

      Lastly, if your organization's procedure is to pass 22 year old interns the company's "family jewels" to keep overnight and one day they get stolen, it's not the intern's fault at all.

      The management is to be blamed for this. That's pretty much a stupid procedure.

      The intern isn't being paid enough for such a responsibility, nor should the intern be given such a responsibility in the first place.

      --
    3. Re:It gets better...er, funnier at least by HeWhoMustNotBeNamed · · Score: 1

      Unless you are a business.

      Our LLC received a notice that our EIN was on that tape. The letter referred us to a site of what to do when the data was used and how to prevent identity theft. No offer to monitor usage was extended to us as individual partners in the LLC. I guess Gov. Ted Strickland is ok with businesses being impersonated.

    4. Re:It gets better...er, funnier at least by iknowcss · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Interesting to note on the page:

      A letter is also being mailed to the most recent address we have on file. You should receive this communication in the mail very shortly.
      Looks like some Smiths are going to find out their SSN has been stolen whether or not they know how to use a computer :)
      --
      Life is rarely fair. Cherish the moments when there is a right answer.
    5. Re:It gets better...er, funnier at least by captainClassLoader · · Score: 1
      gskouby asks:

      Anybody see anything fishy about this page?

      Sorry to be a spelling Nazi here, but I think you meant: "Anybody see anything phishy about this page?".

      There, fixed it for you. And to answer your question - Maybe it's all perfectly fine. Perhaps they just had another intern whip that site up in FrontPage on his/her lunch hour.

      --
      "The plural of anecdote is not data" -- Bruce Schneier
    6. Re:It gets better...er, funnier at least by LuxMaker · · Score: 1

      I see this as the new and improved Nigerian Email scam. You receive an Email notifying you that your identity has been stolen, but quick, if you click on the link and sign up for this one free year of ID theft you can be protected. This reminds me of the spyware remover that was in fact spyware.

      --
      I regret that I only have one mod point to give per post.
    7. Re:It gets better...er, funnier at least by N6546R · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tonight at 11: Smith family mysteriously receives 4,627 pieces of mail in one day. Sources cite the 'hardcopy Slashdot effect'.

    8. Re:It gets better...er, funnier at least by pbhj · · Score: 1

      I tried and got this:

      "The information you have provided matches our records for an uncashed check that was issued to you for state tax refunds, lottery payments, or unclaimed funds. This verification only means that your name and social security number were on the stolen device. Please check your records to determine whether or not you received or cashed the check."

      Sounds interesting, no?

      Also sounds rather like the "free speedboat" episode of the Simpsons.

    9. Re:It gets better...er, funnier at least by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you would have gotten more hits with Rodriguez.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    10. Re:It gets better...er, funnier at least by gskouby · · Score: 1

      I think it is only fair to point out that they have put this on an SSL cert now. Even if nobody will read this because it will be at +1.

  16. Re:It Figures... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

    Um, I wouldn't call anyone forgetting backup tapes in his car a good employee. Besides the risk of being stolen, melting is another possiblity if its hot enough.

    That, and he should know better than to not report something stolen to the police... especially if its someone else's property.

  17. Are you really trying to blame Bush? by benhocking · · Score: 4, Funny

    First, someone decided to blame the Scaled Composites explosion on Bush and now this? I don't like Bush, either, but there are (still) limits to his power, you know.

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
    1. Re:Are you really trying to blame Bush? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      First, someone decided to blame the Scaled Composites explosion on Bush and now this? I don't like Bush, either, but there are (still) limits to his power, you know. No one's blaming this on him. Just asking why he or anyone of his cabinet members never takes responsibility and owns up to messes they've made.

      "It's someone else's fault but you're lucky you have me cause I'll fix it!" Should be:

      "I'm in charge of a system that's broken and I am partly at fault for that. It will be fixed though, these processes will be improved." But, you know, I've never once heard Bush personally say that he's responsible for anything--you can't trust people like that.
    2. Re:Are you really trying to blame Bush? by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      That's what they want you to think!

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    3. Re:Are you really trying to blame Bush? by Billosaur · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which leads to the obligatory:

      You don't know the power of the Dark Side

      Seriously, every President of the United States goes through this at one point or another. You're the most visible representation of authority in the United States, so when something bad happens, people blame you. Doesn't matter that you had no way of doing it, no control over the process that caused it, or didn't care about it. I don't think W is going to rank up there with the best President's when it's all said and done, and he's certainly not on my Christmas card list, but the rampant need to blame everything on him is ludicrous. Besides, we Americans only have ourselves to blame -- we elected him! Well... I didn't... I voted for Optimus Prime...

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    4. Re:Are you really trying to blame Bush? by Ravenscall · · Score: 1

      Maybe because this is a State of Ohio issue and we have not realy had anything to do with the Bushes since Prescott was working with the Nazis out of Columbus.

      --
      You say you want a revolution....
    5. Re:Are you really trying to blame Bush? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't like Bush, either, but there are (still) limits to his power, you know. The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits. -- Albert Einstein
    6. Re:Are you really trying to blame Bush? by Nullav · · Score: 1

      Maybe because this is a State of Ohio issue and we have not realy had anything to do with the Bushes
      Oh good, finally people realize that, for the most part, state and federal government are seperate. Finally a logical poster.

      since Prescott was working with the Nazis out of Columbus.
      Holy shit! Angry German people and Spanish explorers? ...You lost me there.
      --
      I just read Slashdot for the articles.
  18. Re:It Figures... by AutopsyReport · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, it's easier for any entity to blame its peons for misjudgment rather than highlight the lack of process that would have prevented this type of situation in the first place. The higher-ups had the noose on this kid before anyone else bothered to realize the intern is not to blame. And now we've got an article on Slashdot about how the "intern" lost the SSN's. But did he really lose them?

    To all the comments that are calling the intern an idiot for leaving the tapes in his car, I ask you this: where should he have stored them? In his apartment which can be just as easily broken into? Was he supposed to rent out a protected storage unit at his own expense? The correct answer is that he should have never been responsible for storing them. Now ask yourself what is worse: a superior handing over 800,000 SSN's to an intern, or an intern leaving those SSN's in his car?

    --

    For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

  19. Libertarians rejoice! by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    I'm sure if Big Evil Government was in charge of these tapes, it would have hired a $250/hr consultant to give them to a $21/hr intern to lose. Think of the savings!

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    1. Re:Libertarians rejoice! by Dr.+Smoove · · Score: 1

      This is one of the funniest dam threads I have read in a while! The people in the other cubes must think I am high I am laughing so much.

      --
      "If you plant ice, you're gonna harvest wind."
  20. Why take it home by jshriverWVU · · Score: 1

    In all of these articles that pop up the same thing pops in mind. Why are people allowed to take anything of value home with them? Information like this needs to have some kind of cvs/subversion system with it. If you need to check it out, there is a trail showing who has what, and people shouldn't be allowed to take things home, and all sensitive information needs to be encrypted whether internally or not.

  21. Thief probably thought he had a VHS tape by lordscotus · · Score: 1

    Thief probably thought he had a VHS tape! ... but it wouldn't play, so it went into the trash.

  22. Simple Solution To All This by deadline · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is a simple solution to this kind of thing. You take the SSN, bank account and CC numbers of the person in charge (the General, Congressman, CEO etc.) and you put them in every container, laptop, tape, HDD, USB stick, etc. that has private information on it.

    Problem solved.

    --
    HPC for Primates. Read Cluster Monkey
  23. Negligence by HamsterRabies · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The 22 yr olds' response is unacceptable given the amount of press and exposure identity theft is given.

    The value of labor per hour is not relevant and should be considered distraction of truth in this situation. The reality is that an adult of mature age was directed to secure the property and was asked to take it home and keep it safe.

    Whether this was wrong or not is non point the moment he accepted the assignment.
    The fact that he left it in his vehicle is a first point of negligence.
    The second fact would be his willingness to do something he felt was a risk, such as taking these tapes home.
    The third being his lack of documented objection to the process and procedure which is obviously faulted.

    1. Re:Negligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The second fact would be his willingness to do something he felt was a risk, such as taking these tapes home.
      The third being his lack of documented objection to the process and procedure which is obviously faulted.


      It's good to see that "just following orders" isn't acceptable in this case, but the thing to remember is that the Germans who were just following their orders didn't absolve them of their crimes, neither did that fact absolve Hitler of his for giving the orders in the first place.

    2. Re:Negligence by RingDev · · Score: 1

      Going on 30 it is easy to see the mistakes I made at 20.

      Going on 20 it was easy to see the perfection I lived my life as.

      In a perfect world, yeah, everyone would turn 18 and become a perfect citizen. Responsible, with forethought and concern... In reality, we all learn a lot after becoming 'adults'.

      Everyone on /. will agree, Their backup plan was retarded.

      The fact that a young, non-professional, pre-entry level peon was left to decide for himself the best plan of action regarding these tapes when he has little or no possible recourse with out risking his internship should be more than enough to excuse him.

      This was the end result of a long chain of management screw-ups.

      I would bet that the peon has learned something from all of this. But the real question is, what is the department's backup plan NOW?

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    3. Re:Negligence by TechnicolourSquirrel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This guy is an intern. Know what that is? Hint: for an intern, there is no 'not accepting the assignment'. Might as well say nothing and just stay home, instead, because that's about to be your 'new assignment', anyway...

      Intern: "I know that I have no experience and no battle-tested skills, but I'm afraid I must disagree with the way you're running this company. My recommendation is to--"
      Boss: "Excuse me, but do you work here?"
      Intern: "Uh, yeah. Summer program."
      Boss: "Well, this year, Fall's comin' early!"

      It is to laugh. But seriously, in the service of battling this apparently massive epidemic of worldwide intern negligence, I have done a bit of research into all of the "documented objections to process and procedure" which have ever been initiated by interns, throughout all of time and space. Here's the complete list...






      Didja miss it? Sad state of affairs, wouldn't you say? Which begs the question: WHY are America's interns so incompetent? We need to train our interns! In fact, somebody should start some sort of training program with this very thing as its goal. Why even stop there? Why not a training program at every company? America needs to get its act together, because education is everything.

    4. Re:Negligence by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      And yet, in the end, the company is still to blame for passing the buck down so far that someone who doesn't care is left in charge of something important. Passing the buck works sideways, and up the chain, but not down the chain. They're responsible for what happens underneath their authority.

      First point, absolutely true. He had a task and he fucked it up.

      Second point, also true. But if the boss in accounting wants hotdogs and tells the lowest-rung of the department to get it, he can either get the hotdogs which is out of his job description, or GTFO. He's disposable with no value as an employee(hence an intern) so he can choose between losing his job or doing what he's told. He is under considerable pressure to do whatever he's told. The boss isn't excused from putting him in this position just because he accepted it. Prostitutes accept pimp-slaps.

      Now the intern's job is gone. That's pretty much a given here.

      Intern faces a big penalty for saying no, and very minimal risk for accepting the tapes. What are the chances those tapes will get taken? It's pretty unlikely, and an acceptable risk for getting your first crack at job experience. It's easy in retrospect to say he shouldn't have taken them, but judgement comes before seeing the result. Lottery tickets are an idiot tax, just because someone wins on a lottery ticket doesn't make them less of an idiot for buying the ticket. He can say no and lose the job immediately, or say yes, and suffer a small possibility of losing his job later.

      His pay is indeed relevant, because many people believe that risk should equal reward. Whether or not you agree, this is a view that people have. Putting the blame on the intern means he gets high risk for little reward while the boss has high reward and no risk? Companies can't just pass all the blame down to disposable youths. Management has to be held accountable. The intern does share responsibility, and that responsibility scales with his paycheck. That paycheck was on the line and is forfeit. The intern is eating his appropriate share of blame already. I am not suggesting that you believe that all the blame on the intern and none on the management, you didn't suggest this anywhere in your post. I am merely posting an addendum and my opinion that the management should bear the bulk.

      Third point, also true, but ridiculous. Paper trailing everything is unfeasible. Boss tells the intern what to do, the intern doesn't get to tell the boss what to do. The intern can't tell the boss to e-mail it or sign a memo. The intern just gets fired for not doing what he's told. Even if the intern asks for an e-mail or memo clarification, the boss can just come down and tell him verbally again. Especially likely if the intern is working right next to the boss.

      Intern gets the choice of his job or obedience at each step because he has no leverage as a low-rung employee with no value on his resume.

      Nuremberg trials were between the choice of killing people and their job(well, possibly their life). Killing people vs. holding data tapes are different. Both are important, but saying they're the same is sillyness. The expectation we have on people faced with these decisions depends on the scale of what is asked of them. Killing people vs. the job? No. Holding tapes overnight vs. the job? Yes. Getting hotdogs for the boss? Yes. All are things he shouldn't be asked to do, but not all of them are worth trading his job to fight.

    5. Re:Negligence by animaal · · Score: 1

      ...I have done a bit of research into all of the "documented objections to process and procedure" which have ever been initiated by interns... I think you've neglected to include the objection from Monica Lewinsky
    6. Re:Negligence by rssrss · · Score: 1

      D-Day: Hey, quit your blubbering. When I get through with this baby you won't even recognize it.
      Otter: Flounder, you can't spend your whole life worrying about your mistakes! You fucked up - you trusted us! Hey, make the best of it! Maybe we can help.
      Flounder: [crying] That's easy for you to say! What am I going to tell Fred?
      Otter: I'll tell you what. We'll tell Fred you were doing a great job taking care of his car, but you parked it out back last night and in the morning, it was gone. We report it to the police, D-Day takes care of the wreck, the insurance company buys your brother a new car.
      Flounder: Will that work?
      Otter: Hey, it's gotta work better than the truth.
      Bluto: [thrusting six-pack into Flounder's hands] My advice to you is to start drinking heavily.
      Otter: Better listen to him, Flounder, he's in pre-med.
      D-Day: [firing up blow-torch] There you go now, just leave everything to me.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
    7. Re:Negligence by Iriel · · Score: 1

      And if his home has been broken into, is it still his fault? These days, most organizations treat the questioning of their practices as a threat, which is usually to be eliminated. Besides, had there been a better procedure, this wouldn't have even been a risk.

      Yes, leaving the tapes in his car was stupid, but so is the operation to begin with, and if you say he should have left, you're obviously not a 22-year old trying to make it in Ohio's abysmal job market.

      --
      Perfecting Discordia
      www.stevenvansickle.com
    8. Re:Negligence by TechnicolourSquirrel · · Score: 1

      ...I have done a bit of research into all of the "documented objections to process and procedure" which have ever been initiated by interns... I think you've neglected to include the objection from Monica Lewinsky That's a helluva way to spell 'Linda Tripp'!
    9. Re:Negligence by HamsterRabies · · Score: 1

      Not to nit pick- because I see your points well, but HR doesnt share everything you state in their office with the department. In fact, you can go in there and tell them anything you need to, ask them to file your objection, and then object to sharing said objection unless it is anonymous.

      They are obligated to follow your directions.

  24. Old news by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 1

    This is old news for Ohioans. I submitted this story to /. 2 weeks ago...

  25. gpg/pgp encryption by mwilliamson · · Score: 1

    For a good portion of my database backups that may or may not contain confidential information, I tar, compress and encrypt with gpg my backup data files before they get put into a directory archived by by our automated tape library. I don't have to trust who has the tapes, and who is going to carry them off-site during our next hurricane threat. I clocked gpg on a fairly modest Dell 2950 server at about 10 megabytes / second. If you need more, there are hardware-based accelerator cards available.

    1. Re:gpg/pgp encryption by mwilliamson · · Score: 1
      Dear Congress,

      Please enact a law requiring that each and every use of our SSN be verified by the assignee (by phone, in-person, etc) of the SSN. Force the credit-granting agencies to verify before granting credit in such a way that the verification could only be used one time, for a limited time frame, for a set amount of credit to extend. Write the law in such a way that the credit issuer and credit agency are responsible for any un-verified credit and not the holder of the SSN.

      This will undoubtedly stir opposition amongst the credit-industry lobbyists, but please remember you work for us, not them. We expect adequate protection and this very simple process would provide just that.

      Thank you for your time.

      Michael S. Williamson

    2. Re:gpg/pgp encryption by iMaple · · Score: 1

      The congress doesn't read slashdot. They are all on digg :)

  26. And I think the bigger problem by DragonWriter · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is your reading comprehension:

    There were SSN's of 770,000 taxpayers plus 64,000 state employees that together were 7.3% of the state population. Nowhere does it say that 7.3% of the population was working for the state government.

    1. Re:And I think the bigger problem by afidel · · Score: 1

      Ah, I had read an earlier article that said the SSN's were from state employees. Guess it pays to RTFA =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  27. Just SS numbers by john_is_war · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Just imagin how much information would be available if the RealID act was in effect. This is precisely the reason I don't trust the government with my information: they can't keep it safe.

    --
    Live life to the fullest. It's not that life is short, but that you are dead for so long.
  28. A few points on his statement by galego · · Score: 2, Insightful
    From his statement: As an intern, I do not create policy, I do not interpret policy, and I do not question policy. I do what I am instructed to do.

    1) He also obviously did not take time to investigate or read the policy. Granted .. this can be also blamed on supervisor's. But there is no 'patch' for ignorance, correct? Sometimes you only get one shot. 2) If he had any idea what was on the tape, he should not have left it in his car. I don't know if it was in the open or not, but 'intern' or not, he should be aware of the sensitivities of that sort of data. He commented on the policy (which he was not aware of until after the fact ... we've covered that) and said it was "unreasonable to assume that the person would not stop somewhere on their way home". (He is questioning the policy, but we'll cover that next.) Again ... if I knew what was on that tape (granted, I am not an innocent, young 'intern'), I wouldn't take it. If forced to, I wouldn't let it out of my sight til in my home. 3) He *should* question policy if he wants to be valued .. hopefully he learns from that. That's something I look for in a valuable employee. Questioning does not necessarily mean 'defy' (which I think is what he is trying to say). If not questioning the policy, he should be asking "This stuff is encrypted, right?" They are kind of going after the young intern as someone to pin this on, I'm sure. However, I don't think he can/should hide behind his 'intern' label and fire his pop-gun back saying none of it is his fault. He should admit his part in the mistakes and what he would not repeat ... then point to the broken policy / security model. Also hope they have fraud alerts set up on those 770,000 people and are ensuring they have state-provided equifax accounts! ;)

    --

    Que Deus te de em dobro o que me desejas

    [May God give you double that which you wish for me]

    1. Re:A few points on his statement by galego · · Score: 1

      I'm only speaking to to the intern's statement(s) and his value as a potential employee. If he raises the flag that he should have ... give him a raise and fire the consultant. He's not a mindless worker at a Fast food restaurant. If he's a CS/IT intern of some kind ... he should be at least be aware that taking a tape full of SSN's home is not a good position to be in.

      It this is exploitation, by all means, let the blame fall on the $125/hour consultant. All I'm saying is that this intern is playing the same 'blame' game ... the cards are just stacked against him and he shouldn't play that game. Fess up to your mistakes, learn, show you've learned something ... and move on.

      --

      Que Deus te de em dobro o que me desejas

      [May God give you double that which you wish for me]

    2. Re:A few points on his statement by MattCohen · · Score: 1

      I disagree that responsibility rests with the intern in this matter in any way. It is unfair to blame him for not reading a policy. It is a management responsibility to actively engage in an information security policy life cycle that includes, but is not limited to, the creation of procedures for implementing policy - such as encrypting backups and secure transport and storage of those backups and setting job responsibility for same - as well as providing for employee, consultant and intern education on policy that applies to their job responsibility. It is further a management responsibility to monitor and enforce the security policy. My conclusion is that the highest levels of management are clearly the ones at fault for not having put in place an effective organizational information security program to protect the personal information with which they were entrusted.

    3. Re:A few points on his statement by galego · · Score: 1

      I agree with you 100% in *legal* terms. I agree that they ("management") should go down in flames for such pathetic policy and oversight.

      I also believe that the intern should have had the sense to question what they were asking him to do ... policy or not. Taking official work backups with SSN's on them home?!?!?! Maybe I misread something in the article, but he never claimed not knowing what was on those tapes. But if he did claim that ... even worse ... taking backups home from work and you have no idea what's on them! I don't want the boy handling anything with my data on it. And yes ... I don't want inept management hiring someone who would do such a thing. Vicious cycle, eh?

      I'm not at all for roasting the kid legally. I would just hope he had the sense to admit his 'lessons learned' and not try to play the blame game that they are. It's not going to get him anywhere or make him any more valuable of an asset in the future.

      --

      Que Deus te de em dobro o que me desejas

      [May God give you double that which you wish for me]

    4. Re:A few points on his statement by galego · · Score: 1

      I work in IT as a technical lead. I do some management, but mostly have to 'get things done'. That's why I'm interested in people who can not only follow directions, but *evaluate* them when they are ridiculous. You can question things and do so without being 'obstructionist' or 'difficult'. If you've read my other posts in the thread, you'd understand that I'm not advocating putting *legal* blame on the kid. I'm advocating him *thinking*, learning from his mistake, and not trying to hide behind "but they told me to take home tape backups with 800K unencrypted SSN's and I was just doing what they told me." You're in IT, right? You would do that? You wouldn't question it?

      Management in this case should be roasted for bad policy, bad oversight and generally shady dealings. My original comment was only in regards to the intern flailing his arms and saying nothing at all was his fault. This kid was a 'yes man'. Had he not been so, (had be been 'obstructionist') he would not be in this situation. That's all I'm saying.

      Yes, I am in IT management and despite all you seem to know about me from one post, I do take full responsibility for my actions (good and bad). I even post as a with a non-AC account on slashdot. ;)

      --

      Que Deus te de em dobro o que me desejas

      [May God give you double that which you wish for me]

  29. Yes, I am by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I stubbed my toe this morning on my coffee table. Explain to me how that is NOT Bush's fault. You got no answer for that one, huh?

    1. Re:Yes, I am by vimh42 · · Score: 1

      Haliburton built the coffee table right?

    2. Re:Yes, I am by shelterpaw · · Score: 1

      Because Bush told the Secret Service to move the table 1 inch in the other direction.

    3. Re:Yes, I am by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      Gerald Ford.

  30. I live in Ohio by jshriverWVU · · Score: 1

    What is this ID protection that keeps coming up in here? I haven't heard anything about it.

    1. Re:I live in Ohio by AetherWolf · · Score: 1

      If your info was on the disks the state would've sent you a letter with an id protection form. Yeah...as if doing it online wasn't bad enough, They want you to put ALL of your critical information on a piece of paper and MAIL it to texas... Sound bad to anybody else? This should've been handled in state. Ohio massivley dropped the ball...twice now. The form also doesnt look very convincing, i actually took it to the police station to see if they knew anything about it. Form is legit tho. Im still not doing it. This sucks.

    2. Re:I live in Ohio by n1ckml007 · · Score: 1

      I assume they're referring to a service that the 3 credit companies offer, it's way to "freeze" your credit as a way to protect yourself if you think you may been a victim of identity theft. Also they may offer some monitoring to go along with this, of course this is normally a fee based service.

    3. Re:I live in Ohio by tf23 · · Score: 1

      Have you been living under a rock? It's been on all over the news, the papers. In-fact, it's almost as if it was the only story reported for quite some time.

  31. Gmail by Alzheimers · · Score: 1, Funny

    800,000 SSN numbers
    9 digits in an SSN number
    1 comma delimiter per number
    -----------
    8,000,000 digits

    This is still under Gmail's 10mb per email rule. He could have just emailed himself the list as backup.

    (yes, I know there's more data than the number. That's why you get 2.8gb+ of space!)

    1. Re:Gmail by some_developer_somew · · Score: 1

      you forgot that it was probably in one Excel spreadsheet

  32. Also, scam sites are going to be all over this by sgant · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can see it now, spam email going out saying "due to the recent theft of Social Security numbers, please check here to see if your number was stolen. Just input your number here, and we'll tell you if yours was part of the theft...have a nice day..."

    --

    "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    1. Re:Also, scam sites are going to be all over this by ambclams · · Score: 1
      I can see it now, spam email going out saying "due to the recent theft of Social Security numbers, please check here to see if your number was stolen. Just input your number here, and we'll tell you if yours was part of the theft...have a nice day..."

      Sadly, this has already been done. I particularly like the FAQs about why it's safe.

      --
      Life is far too important to be taken seriously.
    2. Re:Also, scam sites are going to be all over this by superstick58 · · Score: 1

      OK, but as a citizen of the glorious state of Ohio, how do I verify, legitimately, that my number was not included in the theft?

    3. Re:Also, scam sites are going to be all over this by superstick58 · · Score: 1

      Well now it seems I'm not part of any of the groups highlighted in the formal investigation in Exhibit A.

  33. The ones to blame by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
    are any and all organizations that collect a fixed 9-digit number (that is assigned at birth and revealed to hundreds of parties over a lifetime), and then use it in such a way that just knowing that number would ever be a security risk. The fact that this absurd practice is almost universal is just sheer stupidity on a national scale.

    Maybe there should be a law that automobile license plate numbers should be the same as the owner's SSN. That would put a damper on the temptation to use SSNs as some kind of secret passphrase.

  34. SARBOX - GLBA by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    Sarbanes-Oxley defines many internal controls for publicly traded companies. Many of these controls directly apply to IT departments and their disaster recovery/business continuity plans.

    The Gramm Leach Bliley Act defines how financial firms handle and use non-public information. It may be time to expand that to ALL organizations that store and use non-public information.

    It is time to insist that Government agencies also implement the types of controls mandated by SARBOX and GLBA. If those controls are so important, why doesn't our Government implement the same exact policies?

    We need legislation that protects ALL non-public information regardless of who stores it or why it is used.

    -ted

  35. And this is why by Anarke_Incarnate · · Score: 3, Insightful

    SSNs should NEVER be used as primary identification numbers. They are legally only allowed to be used for distribution of benefits and collection of "tax" towards paying out those benefits.

    They are essentially a pyramid scheme to keep old people happy. You have to put them on everything, because they have become a national ID number. People are to complacent with that.

    1. Re:And this is why by Stu+Charlton · · Score: 1

      And most banks & telephone companies insist on having a copy of it. All the automated systems are built around it ("please enter the last 4 digits of your SSN, followed by the # sigh").... If you refuse to give it, you're stuck in operator queue hell.

      --
      -Stu
    2. Re:And this is why by korbin_dallas · · Score: 1

      Yes, well, THANK YOU MR. OBVIOUS!
      But its too f*&^king late for that (TFLFT!). Idiots and idiotic corporations continue to use it.

      Corporations SHOULD double check and verify the info given to them. But heres the deal, they don't care.
      My mother in law opens a phone account with Sprint, using my wifes SSN. Sprint never verifies anything. We find out from family members, wife calls Sprint (since they think she opened the account) and closes it. THEN we try go thru channels to fix it up. Sprint faxes us a document they say documents the ID theft and fixes it. WRONG, its a transfer of account to US! Jackasses.

      The best thing to do is figure out for yourself, how to create a new ID! Then use it to your advantage. The system is that badly broken.

      The stupid monitoring shit doesn't help anything, just lets you know when you need to pay some company for your 'new' account.

      --
      They Live, We Sleep
    3. Re:And this is why by Renaissance+2K · · Score: 1

      If we didn't use SSN as our "national ID number" and instead just imposed a new "national ID" system, that would just become the new target of identity thieves.

      As long as we're doing business remotely, there's always going to be a way to steal and spoof someone's identity.

      Of course, it would be very Bush-like to say something along the lines of, "Due to the dramatic rise in the number of identity thefts catalyzed by the theft of social security numbers, the administration has decided to dissolve the Social Security system and use all assets accumulated to this point to send Michael Moore to the moon."

    4. Re:And this is why by Anarke_Incarnate · · Score: 1
      Seems you missed the point.

      We should have NO national ID system. This "Ver are yor Papers!" crap disgusts me.

      In a free society, there would be no national ID, not "A different one."

    5. Re:And this is why by Renaissance+2K · · Score: 1

      You'd rather we had a separate identifier for every separate institution that we're a part of? What ties it all together? How do we know the John Smith trying to take out a $500,000 mortgage isn't the same John Smith that still owes $200,000 in student loans? If organizations are allowed to cross-reference their records with the records of other organizations, how is that any safer than using SSNs?

      All-in-one cell phones are selling rather well, considering - if it gets stolen - you lose your music, your movies, your games, your documents, and your personal information... not to mention the ability to, you know, send and receive calls. Whether you have one ID number, 500 ID numbers, or none whatsoever, identity theft is still going to be possible, and it's almost always going to be the result of carelessness; either on the part of the victim, or the Leaders of Tomorrow (tm) like the guy in this article.

    6. Re:And this is why by Anarke_Incarnate · · Score: 1
      Easily. If they compromise my Citibank account, they don't have access to my tax records, or to my school records, or to ANYTHING else. This is as bad as having 1 password to every system you touch, but not encrypting it. You hand it out to everyone who asks. I would rather have it managed in a more sane way and have it be different at MY choosing.

      The Gov't sees me as 1 entity, my bank(s) as another, schools as another.

    7. Re:And this is why by PSC · · Score: 1

      SSNs should NEVER be used as primary identification numbers.

      You can safely use SSN for identification, as long as you don't use them for authentication.

      Identification: Who I claim to be - the (user-) name, the SSN, my Slashdot nick.

      Authentication: That's how I prove it - the password (something I know), key (something I have), fingerprint (something I am).

      --
      --- The light at the end of the tunnel is probably a burning truck.
    8. Re:And this is why by Anarke_Incarnate · · Score: 1

      This is a moral issue as well as a technical issue. I hate a number, foisted upon me by the gov't being used as "WHO" I am. I am not my number.

    9. Re:And this is why by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed, or numbered! My life is my own.

    10. Re:And this is why by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      A national Id number is illegal at the moment. You'd need a constitutional ammendment allowing it - good luck getting the states to ratify that.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  36. fireproof safe by freg · · Score: 1

    I'm going to take this opportunity to make my point once more that a fireproof safe (most all good safes are fireproof aren't they?) is quite often better than off-site storage. Especially if it's built into the floor or wall, tho thats not always possible.

    1. encrypting isn't necessary with on-site storage, thus lowering backup resources, increasing recovery speed.
    2. off-site storage is to protect from natural disasters and theft, both of which a reasonably sturdy lock-box is good for.
    3. theft and damage is more likely with off-site backups, even if my data is encrypted I'd rather not hand over my nice big drives. plus the idea of tape drives sitting in the back of a 150 degree car window isn't ideal...
    4. on-site means you can get to your backups when u need to, instead of when the intern decides to come in.

    feel free to nitpick my points

  37. $125 an hour? by n1ckml007 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm obviously in the wrong career path; I could be losing SSN's for $125 an hour! Maybe next year I can move on to some $200 an hour medical record losing gig.

  38. outsourcing at is best by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    The state can like pay the consultants a FULL time wage with benefits are it is like that consultants making $125/H and $200/H don't get them.

  39. Re:It Figures... by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    "But did he really lose them?"

    Uh, yes. That is emperical fact. They were in his car and he left them unattended.

    "... where should he have stored them?"

    No. '... why would he have taken them?'

    Interns aren't tabula rasa, they're just inexperienced. What background did he have? Any IT schooling? If so, he was aware of what he was doing. All the persons in the chain of command are guilty, even the peons.

  40. I suspect an "Inside Job"... by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    Think about it for a minute...Un-encrypted tapes are given to an in-experienced intern with instructions to take them out of the building. Soon after that, they are stolen.

    There's careless, there's stupid....and then there's pre-meditated.

    I suspect he might be right about the "scapegoat" claim. There is just too many mistakes here by too many people who should have known better for me to accept as a pure "accident"

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  41. His next interview... by Wiarumas · · Score: 1
    Interviewer: Name a time where you had a problem and how did you go about solving it?

    Kid: Erm... well... *sigh*

    Interviewer: Wait a second! I knew I recognized your name! You're that bastard that lost all those social security numbers!!

    --
    I will bend like a reed in the wind.
  42. Downplaying the severity of it by The+Real+Toad+King · · Score: 1

    Using census data from 2000, it seems the stolen data includes social security numbers for 7.3% of the people in the entire state of Ohio. And the city police force has since offered a whopping $500 reward for the return of the data.

    You'd think the theft of tapes that have data that can completely ruin 800,000 people's lives would be worth a little more than $500. I also hope that "whopping" was in satire.

  43. Check the local flea markets? by KE1LR · · Score: 1
    Quality backup tapes can have a fair amount of value - $80 or more per tape is fairly common so if the pawn shop recignizes a tape for what it is the theif could probably make a few bucks.

    I wonder if there are people at computer swap meets/hamfests with boxes of tapes that they sell for a few bucks apiece with interesting stuff on them.

    There have been multiple incidents of people buying "junk" HD's secondhand, taking them home and finding interesting stuff on them.

  44. This Happened to Me by CWRUisTakingMyMoney · · Score: 1
    I'm one of the people whose SSNs were stolen; the vast majority (mine included) of the numbers belonged to people who had not cashed their state tax refund check before some date (29 May comes to mind). Ohio sprung for a year's worth of ID theft protection for everyone involved, not that it probably cost them much, seeing as how the company's name was all over the website set up and letters sent for this purpose. Of course, my SSN will still be stolen a year from now, and it would seem that the best identity theft protection would be not letting identities get stolen in the first place.

    (I was about to ask who in their right mind would let an intern walk out of a building with almost a million cleartext SSNs under his protection, but whoever allowed this obviously wasn't in their right mind.)

    --
    Those who anthropomorphize science and/or nature already believe in an intelligent designer.
    1. Re:This Happened to Me by ThosLives · · Score: 1

      the best identity theft protection would be not letting identities get stolen in the first place

      Actually, I would have to say that the best identity theft protection is to make it so your "identity" is not required for anything important. That way, if it gets "stolen" then it doesn't even matter.

      (The quotes around those select words are because identity can't really be stolen - credentials that instruct people to allow access to restricted resources or activities may be misused and cause all kinds of difficulty. Identity can't be stolen, just faked, but that's getting a bit pedantic. As CWRU is also my alma mater (class of 2000) you should have some idea of the type of pedantry of which I'm capable).

      --
      "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
    2. Re:This Happened to Me by CWRUisTakingMyMoney · · Score: 1

      I commend you on your pedantry, but how exactly is one supposed to keep one's Social Security Number so useless that its theft is meaningless? Like it or not, SSNs are inextricably tied to identity and government services by all sorts of government practices and laws, and there is no way around that currently.

      --
      Those who anthropomorphize science and/or nature already believe in an intelligent designer.
    3. Re:This Happened to Me by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, let the government have SSN's. They belong to them.

      Banks and credit companies should be using something else. They should also (now) be aware that an SSN is meaningless and everyone has had theirs passed around on hacker sites at least once. So when someone comes in with an SSN and a name but not a certified copy of a birth certificate and five or six other documents that would tend to prove who the person on the other side of the desk is, they wouldnt' just give out a $10,000 unsecured loan.

      Right now with an SSN I can go into most merchants and buy at least $5,000 worth of stuff just by filling out a form with an SSN and a few other details. This needs to stop because neither the merchant or the credit company has any idea who they are dealing with.

  45. insane by aleph+taw · · Score: 1

    They gave tapes with highly sensitive data, unencrypted (!) to an intern and let him walk around with it overnight outside their facility. Can someone really be that stupid?

  46. *smacks head* by Hangtime · · Score: 1

    Get a damn tape rotation going and call Iron Mountain for pete's sake. They come by pick up your tapes for offsite storage and return a month later with that same tape ready to go over the top. Couple this with encrypted data and put in a locked case, you don't have these problems. Common sense, damn.

    *shakes his head in disgust at incompetence*

  47. Re:It Figures... by g0dsp33d · · Score: 1

    Why not? I "store" company property at home. Free office supplies!

    --
    lol: You see no door there!
  48. Simple by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 1

    Because implementing these measures in the existing governmental structure has immense, prohibitive costs that the taxpayers (time and again) refuse to foot the bill for in a tax increase.

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
    1. Re:Simple by zerofoo · · Score: 1

      No one is complaining about higher prices passed on to consumers from corporate America thanks to these regulations.

      People are still buying huge homes, Hummers, $3.00/gallon gas, plasma TVs and cell phones. The number of new BMWs on the road is absolutely astonishing.

      As much as corporate America complained about these regs, they did not seem to have much of an impact. I suspect that these regs could be put into place in Government with existing employees and with little overall tax increase.

      The bottom line is the regulators don't want the same rules to apply to them. Hypocrisy at its finest.

      -ted

  49. And the *real* WTF is... by Lumbergh · · Score: 1

    Wait, whoops, wrong website.

    --
    The word is "no." I am therefore going anyway.
  50. I was a state consultant at one of those agencies- by jamcc · · Score: 1

    I was the "UNIX Contractor" for a group that had a few (10 or so) UNIX boxes but no UNIX Administrator. So I did a 6 month stint at that agency working on developing runbook procedures, doing day-to-day stuff, fixing broken hardware (essentially calling Sun service and walking the tech up to the datacenter), and on and on.

    But what confounded me the most was that my cube was right next to a guy who was an "Oracle DBA V" (that's a Database Administrator, level 5) -- There is no DBA 6, so in my thinking, he should at least know who Larry Ellison is. Turns out the guy had just been there "a long time" in other roles and he knew someone that put in a good word for him at our agency.

    Now, mind you, I'm not a DBA. I create your filesystems and chown them to oracle:dba and let you go have fun. But this guy had no clue. None. If it didn't start up on its own, he was stuck. I found myself calling a buddy of mine from a previous job that actually worked at Oracle and was nice enough to not mind helping out when he had a question that I couldn't answer.

    Long story short, as an Ohio Taxpayer, I now fully understand why we're the most tax-disadvantaged state in the nation. We essentially pay double: first time around to pay the state employees (the ones like the DBA V mentioned here) and then the second time around for the consultants to come in and do the actual work.

  51. Hmm, Am I the only one that would like... by kabocox · · Score: 1

    I think that the feds need to make it a federal law that any mass "ID/SSN theft" needs to be reported to FBI with names, addresses, e-mail, and phone numbers of each person that had their ID/SSN stolen. The FBI should then be responsible for informing everyone in the list of theft and the status of the case and whatever legal mumbo jumbo that they need to tell 'em. Then the FBI should turn around and charge the business/state/local/federal department with a bill for contacting n numbers of people and also and bill for mandatory ID theft services charged to the business/state/local/federal department. So if it costs the FBI $.5 to contact 800,000 then would charge the agency $400,000 and then also how ever much the ID theft services costs, which is likely much greater than $.5. I'd think something like %10-20.

    It's not these folks have to start really paying a large/huge dollar value and not just a negative public relations value that any business/state/local/federal department will really start taking this stuff seriously.

  52. Re:It Figures... by EvanED · · Score: 1

    Interns aren't tabula rasa, they're just inexperienced. What background did he have? Any IT schooling? If so, he was aware of what he was doing. All the persons in the chain of command are guilty, even the peons.

    So what should he have done? Said "I'm not taking them" and risked getting fired?

    He made a mistake, even a somewhat dumb one, but it's at least an understandable one. In his situation I would have taken the tapes too, though I would have kept them in the trunk until getting to my apartment, then taken them inside.

  53. Re:It Figures... by Lurker2288 · · Score: 1

    If your apartment is as easily broken into as your car, you might want to move. Most people, by the time they're 22, realize it's not a good idea to keep valuable stuff in your car. And if he didn't feel safe taking the stuff back to his apartment, then the proper response would have been to refuse to take them. If it were me, I'd at the very least want some kind of paper trail indicating my exact instructions, and I'd have kept my eyes on the thing until I was able to return it.

    So the intern doesn't deserve to be singled out; there's plenty of blame to go around. On the other hand, though, he's still kind of an idiot.

  54. Re:It Figures... by lusid1 · · Score: 1

    Yes, but even when he took them inside, he stored them ON TOP OF HIS TV! If he happened to watch TV, those big electromagnets that aim the stream of electrons at his face would eat away at the data.

  55. 0.0625 cents??? by Cassini2 · · Score: 1

    The reward offered was $500 for the recovery of the backup tape.

    $500 / 800,000 = $0.000625 = 0.0625 cents

    Just checking to find out what my identity is worth ...

  56. They're all stupid by Avatar8 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Not just the intern to blame here. There is obvious failure, lack of responsibility and plain stupidity amongst all those involved.


    Consultants reporting to consultants? Great plan if you don't care to remain in control of your company/organization.
    Making a single, bottom level, low income person responsible for your most valuable asset, data? Obviously no concept of sensitive information.
    No encryption? Dumb, dumber and dumbest omission of data management.

    My recommendations:
    1) Keep the intern. He now is knowledgeable and will make better decisions on similar matters; however, let him do the job appropriate to his level. Being fully responsible for off site data should not be part of his job.
    2) Update the policy in accordance with federal, SOX, ISO 17799 and whatever other standards apply to include data encryption and a *real* off site method.
    3) Get rid of one of the consultants. All consultants should be reporting directly to an employee who has interest in the company/organization.
    4) Use the money saved by removing the excess consultant to pay a professional company to pickup and store the tapes off site, in a secure, disaster recovery designed site. Iron Mountain does a pretty good job. (or use their online data transfer method) If nothing else, purchase a small, fireproof box with a lock and make the manager carry it home each night.

    These are really basic IT management decisions. I feel sorry for the people relying upon such an organization with an obvious lack of skill or concern.

  57. Dumb question from non-american by Alkonaut · · Score: 1

    What does a stolen SSN really mean? What can be done by someone who has stolen a SSN? Some form of ID-numbers exist in most countries, but getting it stolen rarely poses a threat to your integrity?

    1. Re:Dumb question from non-american by Shados · · Score: 1

      Im not american either, but here, if you get a SSN stolen, with a bit of creativity you could gather enough info to get a loan or rent an apartment in the name of the person that you stole it from. Then well, never pay it back, ruin their credit rating, etc. Powerful stuff.

    2. Re:Dumb question from non-american by CompMD · · Score: 1

      SSNs can be used to open lines of credit or bank accounts, obtain identification cards or drivers licenses. If Joe Conman has John Q. Public's SSN, he effectively has control of John Q. Public's assets (and thus can financially destroy him) and the ability to fraudulently obtain legal identification.

    3. Re:Dumb question from non-american by Robert+The+Coward · · Score: 1

      I doubt it was just a list of numbers. It likley was a list of numbers, names, addresses, other personal info that the State IRS would keep that would likely give someone everything they need to open lines of credit and fake being those people.

  58. Motivation by Issac_Hayes · · Score: 1

    Why would he steal the tapes? He could have just copied the data and no one would be the wiser.

  59. Two words: DeVry University by The+Media+Mechanic · · Score: 1

    DeVry University. Nuff said. Hire from crap college, get crap employee.

    --
    I can throw as many stones as I wish; my house is made of transparent aluminum.
    1. Re:Two words: DeVry University by DiegoExplosion · · Score: 1

      You must have been someone who did not make it past the second trimester.

    2. Re:Two words: DeVry University by mink · · Score: 1

      DeVry Columbus worked like this (I doubt anything significant has changed):

      DeVry gets students by sending out hired salesmen who will lie to you about everything (and know nothing about technology or DeVry). They specifically target poor people, color does not matter, just that once they are stranded in an unfamiliar place with no money or place to go easily they are easy pickings.

      I know some people who made it through the CS program they run and they are good coders and make good money. The problem is the system DeVry set up is designed to screw the majority as long as they can have a Teddy Ruxpin or IT guy for a big solid waste company TV commercial every couple of years.

      I know people who had to stop, either because they just couldn't get enough work to pay the scam any longer (2 jobs and DeVry "housing" with lots of student aid still couldn't pay the piper), or they got tired of dealing with the incompetent teachers (Columbus has/had a couple really bad ones), the reality after sales (finding out all the lies) or the fact that when you have something to deal with and you need to talk to Administration level people, the staff under them (I assume on orders from them) will do everything they can to prevent any contact between students and non teacher faculty.

      Not everyone who leaves DeVry is a washout who couldn't make it past the second trimester or lacks the ambition or skill to make it. I know someone who had a chance to go to MIT (I have seen the documents) but because they were poor and the DeVry sales guy showed up and talked to the parents, she ended up going there. She had to stop (7th tri as I remember of the 4 year EEET program) because there was no way to make/borrow enough money to pay tuition and live. Now she is a housewife and all those technical skills/talent I saw are not being used. She started life graduating a technical high school with top marks and advanced classes passed (hence the chance to go to MIT). The "DeVry experiance" killed that person and she has never been the same.

      I was in my 5th tri. of EEET and I just could not borrow enough (and my parents couldn't take out PEL loans due to student loans of their own) to keep paying DeVry it's ever increasing tuition/book/etc fees, even working a job and having no life outside of work and school.

      DeVry is a meat grinder designed to suck students dry and discard them after getting as much student aid as they can.

      You can be just as successful in life without going to DeVry. I remember them bragging you could earn a whole 25K per year if you graduated from them. With no degree I worked my way into a technical job that paid as much in half the time it would take to graduate. Over a decade later I have learned many skills/platforms/subjects on my own and have brought my income to levels I never even dreamed of as a DeVry student (upper 70K range, after all this is Ohio, so not easy to hit the 85K national average). The company I have worked for these past 11 years took a chance on a guy who wanted to learn and I think we have managed to do well together. I don't think a bit of paper would have helped greatly, but it might (and doubt it would have been worth the cost) have sped up pay raises a little bit.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  60. Re:Story from school by pclminion · · Score: 1

    His job wasn't to "be perfect." His job was to write a proposal. The other peoples' job was to make sure it contained no mistakes. He did his job, they didn't.

  61. Hippy by benhocking · · Score: 4, Funny

    I voted for Optimus Prime
    Damn hippy. Megatron was obviously the candidate for law and order.
    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
  62. They need to take a cue from spy movies. by sexybomber · · Score: 1

    If you are transporting such a large amount of sensitive data via sneakernet, that shit needs to be handcuffed to the fraking courier's wrist and travel with at least one, preferably two guys in suits and sunglasses.

    Of course, that amount of security still invites theft, but said theft would be in a much more spectacular fashion than a simple car break-in.

  63. Re:Story from school by mollymoo · · Score: 1

    If a manager can delegate everything, including ultimate responsibility, what the fuck are they getting the big bucks for?

    --
    Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  64. Re:It Figures... by csteinle · · Score: 1

    He should not have accepted the tapes to begin with.

    Oh come on. They guy's an intern. What do you expect him to do? Interns, by and large, aren't going to question things. And you can't expect them to.
  65. Obvious Solution by PPH · · Score: 1

    Ohio's Inspector General faults the lack of data encryption ? and too many layers of consultants But their investigation revealed that Ohio's Office of Management and Budget had been using the exact same procedure for over eight years.

    The process is flawed. Hire some consultants to fix it.
    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  66. Two People Actually by EgoWumpus · · Score: 1

    The consultant can engineer it on his own. He sends the tapes home with the intern; the intern acts in good faith, but the consultant takes the tapes in the night. He then sells them to the second party, and is never fingered because the expectation is that it is a random criminal element; the only thing they can cite him for is incompetence, but perhaps at $1/number, he won't care. The interesting thing about this theory is that it does, in fact, sound like the sort of criminal plan that someone would concoct who knew the workings of the system. Most thefts are, in actuality, done by employees of one sort or another - they know what's going on, and so aren't taking a random risk. For that matter, it might not be the consultant, but anyone in the office who knew the deal.

    --

    [Ego]out

    1. Re:Two People Actually by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      Good point, that's an even simpler possibility. Won't make for a good movie though.

      Needs more car chase.

    2. Re:Two People Actually by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      And Sandra Bullock having her brain stolen over teh internets by a shadowy government organisation. I vote Sam Jackson for the angry black guy.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    3. Re:Two People Actually by Dr.+Smoove · · Score: 1

      I just laughed so fuckin loud, I wish I had mod points for that. Bravo, MysteriousPreacher, bravo.

      --
      "If you plant ice, you're gonna harvest wind."
    4. Re:Two People Actually by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      Cheers mate. We're shooting it at the moment and as soon as it's released, you'll get a front row seat at the premiere.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
  67. Well, I could by benhocking · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just let me pull out my dictionary and look up "money laundering".

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
  68. ObThisWeekend by LittleGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wizard.

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    1. Re:ObThisWeekend by absoluteflatness · · Score: 1

      I told you, I'm not Xena, I'm Lucy Lawless.

  69. Why doe well allow Data Tapes and Laptops by ThisIsNotMyHandel · · Score: 1

    Why does the government and companies even allow data such as social security numbers on Data Tapes or Laptops. I might be able to understand encrypted data sources for backup but NO ONE needs to be taking this data from point A to point B in person. What is the point of investing billions of dollars into secure networks and then not use them? My bet is that this "consultant" warned them this would happen. It did happen, and he was going to sell them his solution. Just pass a law stating that this data needs to be encrypted AND can not be taken off site. Why did this kid even have these tapes?

  70. Tape = encryption by LongestPrefix · · Score: 1

    Unless it's an exceptionally disciplined thief, I'd bet cookies to doughnuts that the tape is going to be useless. Sure, there are tape readers are out there, but the use of tape itself is almost an obfuscation technique in itself. You'd have to be a pretty-determined attacker to round up a tape machine, make it work, and figure out the encoding technique on the tape.

    1. Re:Tape = encryption by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      You'd have to be a pretty-determined attacker to round up a tape machine, make it work, and figure out the encoding technique on the tape.

      Oh, really?

    2. Re:Tape = encryption by LongestPrefix · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure, you can buy plenty of tape drives, but are you going to get them to work? To read the right block size? To decode the file format used by the backup tool? To possibly even deal with EBCDIC? This archive was probably split across several tapes. I've worked with several tape systems, mostly SCSI on Linux. It's remarkably hard to get things to work consistently, even when using the simplest tools, or when using some of the nicest. By "work consistently", I mean: consistently restore files when needed. ("Nobody cares about backup. Everybody cares about restore." -- Benjy Feen)

    3. Re:Tape = encryption by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      Actually my point is that if you search enough, you'll be able to decode the stuff. Criminal minds will only search a little and find a good hacker to do the dirty job for them.

      The heck, they'll just sale the tapes at underground auctions.

  71. 8 years... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    and it's the first time that such a thing happened?

    Wow, they were lucky.

  72. Re:It Figures... by captainClassLoader · · Score: 1

    That's the encryption method. I believe the previous intern's encryption method consisted of sticking the tapes to the 2 kg speaker magnet in the back of his guitar amp. That works pretty well, too.

    But, seriously - What was the physical form factor for the stolen tapes? Some of the drives used for heavy backup duty aren't exactly the sort of gear you can purchase at your local shopping mall.

    --
    "The plural of anecdote is not data" -- Bruce Schneier
  73. Heh. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

    Yea, I remember a story about a guy who left a timebomb worm in the system to wipe out the data, and when it ran, it popped up a window saying there was a data error in the database, and please insert a previous backup for a rebuild...The backup guy (a junior employee) inserts tape, worm blanks tape, pops up another insert different tape message...Made it through 2 weeks of tapes before he got suspicious and called his boss.

    So no system is perfect. I'm not a big fan of tape myself, but I am a huge fan of backing up to removable media. There is no reason you couldn't store a zillion backup images or archive files or whatever in your second data center, and that would work fine, but it makes my feet itch a little...Makes me feel like all my eggs are in one basket.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  74. It's Ohio! by berserkr79 · · Score: 1

    What do you expect from a state that also uses electronic voting machines?

    --
    "To Deep? This is nothing! I'll tell you when we're in to deep!" - Max Bialystock, "The Producers"
  75. SSN database for sale by Eric+Smith · · Score: 1
    Don't rely on stolen backup tapes! Buy our new database containing one billion Social Security Numbers, of which many are actually valid. It's available for sale on a DVD-R. Just send $19.95 plus $4.95 for shipping and handling to:

    SSN Database Offer
    142 N. Milpitas Blvd. PMB 379
    Milpitas, CA 95035
    Allow four to six weeks for delivery.

    If you order before midnight, we'll include as a free bonus a second database containing 36525 birth dates. This database has been carefully screened to ensure that every birth date is valid!

  76. Excellent riposte, sir (or madam) by benhocking · · Score: 1

    I salute you!

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
  77. I disagree by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 1

    I think the reason we haven't heard consumers complaining about these regulations is because the companies chose not to pass this cost on to them. Several businesses have complained and others have reconsidered being listed in favor of equity/debts- the level of documentation required by SOX is almost an order of magnitude above what they used to keep, for companies with listed stocks.

    I'm not really complaining about SOX - as a canadian accountant I welcome any changes that bring American companies closer to the international standard for financial information reporting - just saying that the change hasn't always been smooth.

    Let's also consider the cost/benefis of the measures. While higher levels of government (and large cities) have the staff and equipment necessary, yes, the cost of applying SOX is relatively small to burden as it is mostly limited to dditionnal training. Smaller cities however would have to hire more personnel and completly revise their archiving process. It all can be done - at a cost.

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
  78. Two questions by benhocking · · Score: 1
    1. What kind of information do you have on those tapes?
    2. Where does your brother live?
    OK, but seriously, if the information is encrypted (it's not that hard, folks), then any plan like this isn't too bad (in a cost/benefit kind of way).
    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
    1. Re:Two questions by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      1) Source code, masters thesis, a few photos, etc.
      2) 20 miles away
      2a) yes it's encrypted, I have one of his disks at my place as well.
      -nB

      Offshoot of this...
      Would one be liable for data on the disk if it was illegal? Considering it was encrypted I presume you could claim you had no idea.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  79. Why is this marked as 'Troll' by shis-ka-bob · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the parent comment makes sense and calling this a 'troll' us unfair. The consultant was not trying to stop the thieves from knowing what they had, he was covering his ass and hoping that this could just go away. If the correct tactic is to keep the information out of the press, then the police are the ones that should make the call.
    Yesterday, I was the first on the scene to an accident. A kid (temporarily, I believe) lost vision in one eye when the air bag smacked him in the face. I think it was my duty to report everything that I did (check for injuries, make sure he was coherent, move some debris out of the road) to the police officers & ambulance crew. The police can decide was matters, they do this every day. I am a novice & my opinions as to what matters is inferior to their experience.

    --
    Think global, act loco
  80. Bias by benhocking · · Score: 1

    Actually, the "one time somebody takes home a laptop with sensitive data on it", 99% of the time they bring it back and nothing happens, so you don't hear about it.
    Damn media bias. :P
    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
  81. Encryption too hard by ACMENEWSLLC · · Score: 1

    So how many of us use Cell Phones, flash drives, portable hard drives, etc all with sensitive information unencrypted in them?

    I have PGP, TrueCrpyt, and other similar products installed. It's just too hard. I have a 160GB hard drive that fits in my pocket. I have a ton of data on it.

    I want to use encryption. I have TrueCrypt on it and have several virtual hard drives. But when I go to dismount the virtual drive, Windows has it locked and it won't unlock. If I dismount it anyway, the volume becomes corrupt. So to use this, I have to log off the PC any time I want to dismount the physical & thus virtual drives. I don't mind typing in a 20 character pwd each time, but the corruption is a bad thing.

    I use PGP, but I have to install PGP onto any Windows PC I want to unencrypt these files with. I also have to keep a copy of my keys with me so I can edit and save these files. That's a bummer.

    I still have things like my backups encrypted. No way I want someone getting all the info in my registry that's stored in plain text such as Nortel Network's software which stores your network passwords that way. One day I will loose one of these drives.

    The phone's got a PIN lock on it that locks after 1 min & at power up. Defeats the lay thief, but anyone can grab the memory and view it on a card reader. No options on the phone to encrypt it.

    I agree, we should all be using encryption. But the options I've tried leave much to be desired.

  82. Cost of living and all that by benhocking · · Score: 1

    I think that it might depend somewhat on where you live. A consultant in Ohio will probably be cheaper than a consultant in New York or the UK, because their cost of living isn't as high. $125 would still not be much, but you could probably find cheaper (certified in [insert flavor here], even, for what that's worth) if you really didn't care much about quality.

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
    1. Re:Cost of living and all that by fbartho · · Score: 1

      Why the heck do you get a consultant if you don't care about quality? That doesn't make any sense to me.

      --
      Gravity Sucks
  83. Here's a solution to SSN data tape transfers by British · · Score: 1

    Package tapes containing SSNs with thousands upon thousands of dollars in cash. Then you can have the nice men in armored cars transporting the valuable data around, instead of in Chuck's 1988 Toyota.

  84. I am one of the 800,000. by Diordna · · Score: 1

    "Uh oh" is right.

  85. Anna Kournikova nude! by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Funny

    Made you look.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  86. Re:It Figures... by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

    The trunk would've been a big improvement.

  87. intern by htricia · · Score: 1

    As an intern at a company where I have the potential to do damage if I wanted. What the heck were they thinking to give that data to him? I personally am scared enough if I am logged on as administrator in the production system. I agree that the intern wasn't at fault. There is defiantly something missing from this story though, the data would have been safer if they left it on someone's desk at the office. What if the intern looses them, or leaves them at home when he comes in the next day. Poor Jason, but why even let you have that much responsibility?

    1. Re:intern by joto · · Score: 1

      As an intern at a company where I have the potential to do damage if I wanted. What the heck were they thinking to give that data to him?

      They were thinking that they (a) were fulfilling some bureaucratic requirement for offsite backups, (b) were saving money by doing it in the cheapest way possible, and (c) would always have some intern to blame if something bad happened. This is pretty typical of middle-management thinking in just about any large company or (I guess) government institution.

      I personally am scared enough if I am logged on as administrator in the production system.

      Why? If you have to be logged in as administrator in order to perform your administrator duties, that's what you do. There's nothing to be scared of. Just try to avoid mistakes, and even if you happen to make a "catastrophic" mistake, it usually only costs money, and not even your own, but the companys. It's not like you have as much responsibility as e.g. a bus-driver, who can kill dozens of people through a simple mistake.

      Poor Jason, but why even let you have that much responsibility?

      Again, this is the norm for big companies. When you reach higher in the hierarchy, you get to create slogans (vision/mission statements they are usually called), seach and replace names of departments and products in documents used for ISO-9000 certification, make slides about the importance of worker safety while reducing time alloted to just about every task done at the company (without changing the tasks), and stuff like that. After all, some people have to carry out actual work, and this usually involves a high degree of responsibility, even if the people carrying it out are lower in the hierarchy.

  88. Unfortunately... by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

    I was one of those in that number. I want to hang them up by the short hairs... The thief and the intern.

    --
    The game.
  89. Informative by benhocking · · Score: 2, Funny

    A crackhead might not have great long-term strategizing skills, but they know how to make a quick buck. Odd computer equipment will get you blank looks when you bring it into the computer shop. Nobody needs it, and anybody who would wouldn't go to the pawnshop looking for it. The pawnshop takes stuff like laptops ( not worthless old pentium II desktops ), car steroes, watches, gold, jewelry -- stuff that almost anyone would buy, and has high salability. Backup tapes or disks are not really salable items.
    You sound very ... knowledgeable about all of this. Let me guess, a "friend" told you this. Were you, I mean your "friend", disappointed they wouldn't take backup tapes? ;)
    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
    1. Re:Informative by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      No, I worked at a pawnshop for a summer. ;) Basically, they don't take anything that you couldn't sell on a street corner. They trade in commodities, not specialty items.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
  90. Re:The whole thing is really run by Accenture. by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    the intern is not at fault.

    the $125 an hour consultant is at fault.

    who let's an intern take home the master backup?

    What state official lets a consultant take home a master backup?

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  91. No excuses. by e-scetic · · Score: 1

    I work for a small non-profit organization (400+ people) and our tape backups are taken offsite, under lock and key, in a semi-armoured van by a company which specializes in offsite backup storage.

    This is just fucked up. Heads should roll for this one.

  92. Tapes hanging on the wall next to stolen Stop sign by Runesabre · · Score: 1

    If they are those big tapes used by mainframes, they are probably hanging on the wall at someone's house between stolen "Watch For Ice On Bridge" sign and the "Do Not Enter" sign. To impress chicks of course. :)

    --
    Runesabre
    Enspira Online
  93. replace SSN with something truly secure by reed · · Score: 1

    Too bad you can't recall or revoke an SSN and get another one. If we're going to have a federal ID number, might as well replace this poor de facto key with a real system that allows the issuing agency to record a lost number as invalid, and regenerate you a new one from some privately held source key (that's actually kept secure).

    Reed

  94. Re:I am a victim .... by Booshi · · Score: 1

    I got "the letter" too. For those actually interested, here it is:

    "The State of Ohio has confirmed that your name and social security number was contained on a computer back-up device that was stolen. It is unlikely that someone can access the data contained in the device without specialized knowledge and equipment. Because we have no information to date that the data has been accessed, everything we are doing, or suggesting that you consider doing, is preventative.

    The State of Ohio is doing everything possible to recover the stolen device and protect the personal information that was on the device. We regret that the loss of this sensitive data may place an undue burden of concern on you.

    To assist you in the protection against the potential, though unlikely, misuse of personal information, the state has arranged for identity theft prevention and protection services through Debix to be available for one year at no cost to you. If you would like to take advantage of the Debix coverage, there are two ways to register: on line at www.debix.com/stateofohio or by mail using the attached form. This service will be valid for one year from the date you register for it. Please provide the activation code located at the top of this notification letter under your address when you are registering. Please note that part of the sign-up process includes receiving a phone call from Debix soon after you initiate the registration process. You will also need and email address to complete the process. If you have questions about Debix or its coverage, please contact them directly at (888) 332-4963.

    For additional information including suggestions on things you can do on your own, please refer to www.ohio.gov/idprotect. If you have additional questions, call 1-800-267-4474 Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

    Sincerely,

    Hugh Quill, Director
    Ohio Department of Administrative Services
    State of Ohio"


    Nothing like poo-pooing the importance or potential amount of risk involved with identity theft. Having that data leave the premises overnight is about as safe as sticking it in an 8 year old's backpack and expecting it to come home in one piece. The intern wasn't a moron...that classification falls squarely on the shoulders of the Great State of Ohio.

  95. Dear Diane Feinstein by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 1

    Thank you very much for your assurance that my park bench is secure.

    Since you are one of the Senators representing the State of California in the US Senate, could you please investigate why it is that an intern who compromised the personal information of nearly one million citizens will be allowed back into the workforce while an experienced scientific researcher who has never compromised anyone else's personal information must sleep on a park bench?

    Don't thank me for my time, Mrs. Feinstein. It is my duty and honor to point out the obvious to the nation.

    Sincerely,

    Steven B.
    --

    --
    the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
    1. Re:Dear Diane Feinstein by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 1

      Yes, I can see how marijuana use is much more severe than compromising the personally identifying information of a million citizens. Thank you for pointing that out, Mr. AC.

      --
      the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
    2. Re:Dear Diane Feinstein by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 1

      Thank you for pointing that out. I can certainly see how my personal decision to use marijuana, whose health effects are considered to be "nil"--as compared to drinking and overeating--by all but the most rabidly distorted medical studies, is much more severe to national security than domestic wiretapping, or embezzlement, or graft, or insider trading, or any of the investigations which are currently underway over men and women who sit in Congress, or are business associates of those who sit in Congress, and collect salaries and benefits, and a lifetime compensation and retirement package, which averages to a yearly total of well over one million dollars.

      Thank you for putting all of that into perspective.

      --
      the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
    3. Re:Dear Diane Feinstein by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 1

      Gee, Red, funny you should show up at a time like this.

      Let's look at the article you linked to:
      Title: "Study: Even Infrequent Use of Marijuana Increases Risk of Psychosis by 40 Percent"
      Content: "Using marijuana seems to increase the chance of becoming psychotic...The researchers said they couldn't prove that marijuana use itself increases the risk"

      And no link to the actual study where the numbers could be audited to make certain that they're not using a test group of 5 inmates from country and a control group of 5 guys in the psyche ward.

      Why... YES. I would call that rabidly distorted.

      Thank you for trolling, Red. Please go jump off the nearest cliff.

      --
      the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
    4. Re:Dear Diane Feinstein by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 1

      Whatever your feelings on the matter, it is still illegal. As is embezzlement, fraud, illegal wiretapping, money laundering, and abuse of administrative privelege especially when applied to elected public officials.

      Thank you for putting all of that into perspective.
      --
      the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
    5. Re:Dear Diane Feinstein by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 1

      Just as a dog instantly wakes up and races to the door when it hears its master's voice upon returning home you always coming yammering and barking whenever you see my posts.

      Maybe you're a rabid dog. I know what we should do with you.

      --
      the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
    6. Re:Dear Diane Feinstein by SmellyBumInLaJolla · · Score: 1

      At least I log in, you whiny little bitch.

      Besides, 40% - nearly half - had an increase in psychotic episode when smoking weed. Blah blah blah correlation does not imply causation and all that jazz, but dude - it's 40%.

      Where there's smoke, there's fire.

      Or in your case, where there's smoke, there needs to be a DEA agent.

      But I bet you'd like prison, with all them big sweaty mens to snuggle up with. You could smoke weed and pole in prison. It'd be like heaven on earth for you.

    7. Re:Dear Diane Feinstein by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 1

      At least I log in, you whiny little bitch. Having a million sock-puppet accounts doesn't count as "logging in".

      You did notice that you cited an article mentioning an aggregate study, didn't you? Garbage in, garbage out. They dug up 37 _other_ studies, all of which were probably funded by reefer madness and Just Say No!, and expect to have useful data from them.

      Still no links to the actual studies, though, in order to audit the numbers. It's always better that way because, of the hundreds of such studies that I've looked at, every single one is an example of the most subjective and distorted science possible.

      Oh, did you read the bottom of the page, noting where the supposed researchers came from and who was paying their bills?

      Yes, Red, "rabidly distorted" perfectly describes the link you provided.
      --
      the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
  96. Because to some people... by benhocking · · Score: 1

    Consultant is a code word for "temp".

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
  97. Dear President Bush by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 1

    who rambles on about conspiracy theories without offering a shred of evidence Dear President Bush,

    I have reached a revelation today. Due to the overwhelming ridicule of Anonymous Cowards to each and every legitimate question that I've asked over the last eight months I have decided that it is in my best interests to agree with your line of thinking.

    I believe the conspiracy theory.

    I believe that there is a conspiracy of "black banks" who manage to exchange currency, grant loans, and fund corporations on the international market without ever revealing their location, their executives, or their source of resources.

    I believe that there is a conspiracy of "black corporations" who manage to do business on the international scale, to ship and receive merchandise, to make investments in the global stock markets, to employ thousands of workers in fields ranging from janitorial and food services up to nuclear scientists, all without revealing their locations, the banks who process their funds, investments, and payroll checks, their executives, or their major business partners.

    I believe that there is a conspiracy of men, clad in robes, who live in the deserts and mountains yet have the experience and materials necessary to assemble nuclear devices, to buy and sell all manner of weapons ranging from hand pistols to mortar tubes to grenade launchers to ICBMs, who live completely off the land and under the radar, who can communicate on a worldwide network, and who do business with the aforementioned "black banks" and "black corporations" without ever revealing their names, locations, or any other identifying information.

    I believe that there is a conspiracy of "black executives" who run the aforementioned "black banks" and "black corporations", whose homes and offices are decorated with artwork and artisanship which is paid for in untraceable funds, who travel on cruise liners and jets which cannot be tracked in international airspace, and who play golf, cribbage, bridge, and whose children attend school right next to the other monied wealthy elite of the world without anyone ever knowing anything about it.

    I believe that there is a worldwide conspiracy of "black nuclear contractors" who manage to evade the oversight of the UN, who procure nuclear material from the mining companies which fall under the umbrella of "black corporations", who pay for their employee payroll and their physical buildings with funds from the "black banks", who ship and receive their products using completely unknown "black airlines", whose overland transportation is handled entirely by "black trucking companies", and who buy "black toilet paper" so that they are completely untraceable to the other nuclear interests of the world.

    Specifically, Mr. Bush, I believe in your conspiracy of "black everything" which threatens to attack the US, using "black missles", "black passports", "black computer chips", "black IP addresses", "black bank account numbers", "black airplanes", "black semi-trailers", "black forklifts", "black dockworkers", and have their own infrastructure of "black investigators" who sign off on all the paperwork which is required to move so much as a breath mint across international borders.

    So, Mr. Bush, could you please stop sending the Anonymous Cowards around? I believe in your conspiracy and, just for the sake of arbitrary creativity, I'm going to continue to assume that none of it is possible, and I'm going to continue to ask the obvious questions of,"If these people are powerful enough to move billions of dollars at a time, how the _HELL_ are they doing it behind everyone's back?"

    Don't thank me for my time, Mr. Bush. It is my duty and honor to point out the obvious to the nation.

    Sincerely,

    Steven B.

    Right after you quit smoking pot. Right after all of the politicians, bankers, and stock investors do because, obviously, what I do on my personal time is of much greater importance to the nation than what they do on their personal time.

    Thank you for pointing all of this out.
    --
    the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
  98. yes yes, blah blah by geekoid · · Score: 1

    no, they put them on everything because they are a good identifier in government agencies. Most of these systems are pre internet, so the risk was very low. Now they are changing policy, but implementation may take years.

    Of course, that's not the problem here. This is about a poor tape policy.

    In fact the more SSNs get exposed the better, because they will become untrustworthy for everything but tax.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:yes yes, blah blah by Anarke_Incarnate · · Score: 1
      I somehow doubt that the same idiots in our government who don't understand that you cannot police the internet effectively will understand this. They will pass more laws and feel all warm and fuzzy, all the while, doing absolutely nothing effective.


      I mean, look how good laws against being able to own and carry firearms work. I mean, it has made Washington D.C. the safe place that it is today.

  99. Consultants by jwiegley · · Score: 1

    When are people going to wise up and realize that most consultants are overpriced, incompetent and do not hold the same interests or priorities as those who hire them? Now, I'll admit bias. I'm one of the peons of a very large institution who has recently ramped up its IT consultant usage and is paying through the nose for it. We have also caused it to be the case, through a variety of causes and reactions, that any technically competent employees we use to have no longer work for us. I expect the same sort of attention to detail and security from our consultants as Ohio received.

    There is no escaping the fact that a consultant's priority is to make a profit for the stakeholders of the consulting company. If you are a state or large institution then your resources, need or scope outstrip the benefit of utilizing a consultant. You should be doing the job yourself instead of presenting yourself as a wallet for a consultant to dip into. It becomes an unfair trade and one in which the consultant has negligible risk (notice that Ohio/intern IS vilified in the paper and the consultant is NOT).

    --
    I will never live for sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.
    1. Re:Consultants by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "...that any technically competent employees we use to have no longer work for us. "

      thus implying that you are technically incompetent.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  100. Re:It Figures... by geekoid · · Score: 1

    haha, doubtful the tapes would be close enough.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  101. What I've learned by Trogre · · Score: 1

    After years of hard experience I have learned this principle:

    Never leave anything of value in your car overnight. Ever

    Also of similar importance:

    Never leave anything of value in your car visible, if car is unattended for 30 seconds or more.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  102. Great to be contracting everything, isn't it? by smchris · · Score: 1

    Instead of that evil, old inefficient government actually doing some coordinated work.

    Makes sense. Contractor doesn't give a crap. What's in it for him? And what formal or informal authority does he have to help establish a responsible backup storage plan? So, hey, the kid's car _was_ off-site storage.

  103. Only on monday and friday.... by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    the two laziest or beer infested days of the week.

    But all that income tax is going straight back to the central banks because of govt debt. So you really are
    working for the banks not the govt.

    If the govt had a clue and had no debt, we could all live with zero income tax, and all public funding can be funded through 100% commercial taxation and
    tiny levies/fees on public services.

    Income tax historically wasnt meant to be for everyone, just companies and super rich. Post WW1 the govts got greedy, they had lots of bills to pay for.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  104. Ohio, home of Diebold by ZWithaPGGB · · Score: 1

    And other non-security savvy folks.

    Note to execs considering relocating: Things are expensive over the long term because they are worth more than the alternative. CA, WA, and MA have stood the test of time as tech centers for a reason.

  105. OT by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    "I love mixed metaphors."

    Heh, I love the scene in one of the back to the future movies where the older Biff is trying to give the sports almanac to his younger self.

    Young Biff: "Make like a tree and get out of here!"
    Old Biff: slaps YB on the head, "It's leave you moron! Make like a tree and leave!"

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  106. The student should commit... by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1
  107. Offsite tape storage policy at fault by xyloplax · · Score: 1

    We have Iron Mountain come and pick up our tapes. They put it in a locked box inside a locked truck and put it in secure facility. They are one of the big names in data storage. It should be mandatory for agencies such as this. In fact, you can contract to have YOUR guys put the tapes in the locked box so that they don't even have the key/they don't touch the tapes. Hell, take it a step further and have a video camera trained on the tape library as well. Plus, encrypt your tape backups.

    --
    -- "You can lead a yak to water, but you can't teach an old dog to make a silk purse out of a pig in a poke" - Opus
  108. Try this by Jaime2 · · Score: 1

    So who is going to step up and try:

    ' DELETE Employees --

    or

    ' DECLARE @tbl varchar(128) DECLARE x CURSOR FOR SELECT name FROM sysobjects WHERE type='U' OPEN x FETCH NEXT FROM x INTO @tbl WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS=0 BEGIN EXEC('DELETE ' + @tbl) FETCH NEXT FROM x INTO @tbl END CLOSE x DEALLOCATE x --

    :-)

  109. Re:Story from school by pclminion · · Score: 1

    To piss off bitter little minions like you?

  110. I'd say not like... by sys_mast · · Score: 1

    ...Iron Mountain. They have repeatedly lost backup tapes as well as left them in a maintenance closet that ANYONE that decides to walk into the building could access. So if by 'like' you mean someone that has the same buisness but DOESN'T lose your tapes, yes I agree then.

    http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.j html?articleID=165701015

    Also if you have any amount of data you want to backup you also need HARDWARE encryption, software encryption like you mention will take too long. And that is hard to setup and costs$$$, unless you have very little important data, in which case you are lucky!!

    --
    Those who can, do.