Slashdot Mirror


Jack Thompson Sets His Sights On Halo 3

GamePolitics is reporting that anti-game advocate Jack Thompson is seeking to have Halo 3 declared a nuisance to the public in Florida. He tried the same stunt with Bully, and failed then too. "As with Bully, Thompson clearly hopes the court will grant him a hearing. Although after last year's well-publicized Bully performance, which earned Thompson a Bar complaint from presiding Judge Ronald Friedman, that seems unlikely. More troubling by far are the long term implications of this action. Thompson apparently feels emboldened to invoke Florida's public nuisance law against any video game he desires to target. That is the essence of censorship and the video game industry cannot allow it to continue on any number of grounds - legal, moral or creative."

240 comments

  1. Who cares! by guysmilee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who cares ... he loses every court battle!

    1. Re:Who cares! by pruneau · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, exactly who cares. Can /. stop the stooping lower trend and go tour some more interesting landscape.
      Leave this frigtard alone: he just leaves on the attention he is getting.

      --
      [Pruneau /\o^O/\ warranty void if this .sig is removed]
    2. Re:Who cares! by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Well, a marketing person might look at this the other way.

      Hell, MS might even be paying him to do this. This lawsuit results in the game getting a fair amount of free publicity [however, this is getting smaller as mainstream news is starting to ignore him], and it increases the likelihood of the target market to purchase it [say 13-25 year olds].

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    3. Re:Who cares! by drydirt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who cares ... he loses every court battle!

      I care. He might win one.

      (We're talking about Florida after all, not exactly a bastion of sanity)

    4. Re:Who cares! by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      I dare you to repeat that next time you get hit with a nuisance lawsuit. It costs you money, time and stress.

      If he had to pay costs every time he loses one of these, I wouldn't worry so much.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    5. Re:Who cares! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we get the florida law to declare Jack Thompson a nuisance.
      which: ...tend[s] to annoy the community, injure the health of the citizens in general, or corrupt the public morals

      At least according to Jack Thompson, he is declaring himself a nuisance!

      Kind of Ironic..

    6. Re:Who cares! by mog007 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if these nuisance lawsuits are civil or criminal. If they were civil, then he would have to pay the legal fees of the other side if they won. That's how it works in Florida, the loser has to pay the winner's legal fees.

      That might be the only reason Thompson is still doing this shit in Florida, so he can claim extravagant fees and get a big check if he won. Last I heard the Florida bar was already on the path of disbaring him.

  2. Nuisance by Seumas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why is he allowed to keep doing this? He should be punished for his endless series of nuisance lawsuits and then he should be held accountable for damaging reputations and businesses with his slanderous, ridiculous, attention-seeking, self-serving accusations. That he is given endless court and television time is highly offensive.

    1. Re:Nuisance by pieaholicx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Couldn't Jack Thompson be considered a nuisance at this point?

      I want a lawyer on here right now to tell me if I have a case!

      --
      http://blog.heavensdomain.net
    2. Re:Nuisance by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      It's pretty sad, but it can require something REALLY bad in order to actually disbar a lawyer, and even harder for a judge.

      I remember there was a Drunk Driver lawyer in New Mexico called "Ron Bell", and his slogan was "I sue drunk drivers." Then he was arrested for a DUI, and ended up being disbarred. Now he still sues drunk drivers, he just doesn't represent you himself in the court, as he's not allowed to.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    3. Re:Nuisance by SparkleMotion88 · · Score: 5, Informative

      TFA quotes parts of the Florida law related to nuissance. To sum up even more, something can be declared a nuissance if it damages the moral well-being of the community. The law uses prostitution and gambling as an example.

      These sorts of laws exist for your own protection. If you would choose to engage in these activities, then obviously you are ignorant of the harmful effect it can have on your life and afterlife. So if Jack thinks Halo is morally harmful to those who play it, then he's right and it will be banned as long as a majority of the people agree with him.

      But seriously, we see stories like this in the news all the time, and we continue to fail to see the actual cause of the problem. People like Thompson and others are just using the system that is in place for their own gain. That makes them smart, not stupid. It is the system that is stupid. If ridiculous laws like this didn't exist to begin with, then ridiculous cases like Jack's would never even be heard in court.

    4. Re:Nuisance by Applekid · · Score: 1

      The only real relevance I see in this being news is that your game need not be morally repugnant in order for the wacky anti-game crowd to be opposed to it. Halo 3 doesn't feature blackjack or hookers or cop killing or anything.

      Next stop for the Thompson Train: Tetris.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    5. Re:Nuisance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's pretty sad, but it can require something REALLY bad in order to actually disbar a lawyer
      A single bullet ought to do the trick nicely.

      (Yes, Mr Thompson, chalk up another on your pathetic list of "death threats"! Because every AC on Slashdot is actually a murderer - no, worse than that, a gamer in disguise!)
    6. Re:Nuisance by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      Hi, my name is Vinny, I'll be your lawyer because I think you have an excellent case. I'll need $2000 up front to get us a hearing.

    7. Re:Nuisance by InvalidError · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If he keeps filing non-case cases, he'll get more reprimands and if he persists to the point of actually become considered a nuisance by too many judges, I guess he could eventually get disbarred for repeatedly filing frivolous and potentially anticonstitutional cases. Should such a fortunate event occur, he could still file suits but would need to convince some other lawyer to risk his name on the case... so we'd be far less likely to see any more of his cases reach the courts.

      Jack is video gaming's Doc Mailloux... they claim to operate from higher moral grounds but the world would be far better off without them.

    8. Re:Nuisance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TFA quotes parts of the Florida law related to nuissance. To sum up even more, something can be declared a nuissance if it damages the moral well-being of the community.

      So, when do we move to have Jack declared a nuisance?

    9. Re:Nuisance by hauntingthunder · · Score: 1

      Is there  no way of him being declared a Vexatious litigatant

      <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vexatious_litigation">Vexatious litigatant</a>

      --
      You will never get to heaven with an Ak 47... But A Zu 30 is good for Low Flying Cherubim
    10. Re:Nuisance by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      People like Thompson and others are just using the system that is in place for their own gain. That makes them smart, not stupid.
      Possibly, but more accurately/likely is that he has an agenda to push that he actually believes in. That doesn't make him not so much "smart" or "stupid", but more "different". I think it's pretty unlikely that he doesn't believe in what he's saying, and that he's just saying what he thinks people want him to say. Otherwise, he'd just be a pollster, and be a lot more moderate in his views on morality.
      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    11. Re:Nuisance by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 1

      Can I pay by credit card?

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    12. Re:Nuisance by TomBBY · · Score: 1

      I live in Florida (can you guess who I work for?), and I think the only thing that constitutes a "public nuisance" is Mr. Jack Thompson.

      I would j-walk arcoss a busy street to fatten his eye!

      Vinney...can you get me off for 2K?

      --
      "I didn't know how many of 'em it was gonna take to kick my ass, but I knew how many of them they were gonna use!"
    13. Re:Nuisance by Cctoide · · Score: 1

      Don't be a pussy. This guy seems legit.

      --
      "Let's face it, it's a good story. Accuracy would kill it."
    14. Re:Nuisance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful? I'm so confused...!

  3. Crazy! by Zebra_X · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What? Halo 3 is just another FPS. What is so deplorable about Halo? Actually - it might be a good thing to get MSFT's legal department rolling on crushing this retard.

    1. Re:Crazy! by Seumas · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think Jack Thompson misunderstood the tagline - "FINISH THE FIGHT".

    2. Re:Crazy! by p0tat03 · · Score: 1

      With the unstoppable might of MSFT's legal dept... maybe we can get this guy disbarred finally.

    3. Re:Crazy! by Winckle · · Score: 1

      Surely halo is better than your average FPS, in that you are killing weird aliens, and not other humans. Except in MP of course

    4. Re:Crazy! by Zebra_X · · Score: 1

      Ha ha - that's hilarious!

    5. Re:Crazy! by jelton · · Score: 1

      Or summarily deported to North Korea.

      --
      I am not a lawyer. This post does not constitute any form of legal advice.
    6. Re:Crazy! by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft doesn't even need its legal department.

      Simply announce that until they have resolved Jack's complaint, they are disabling the 360 from playing Halo3 until further notice.

      There's gotta be at least ONE crazy person out there who will track Jack down, and "finish the fight".

    7. Re:Crazy! by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Surely halo is better than your average FPS, in that you are killing weird aliens, and not other humans. Except in MP of course Well, even in single player, I found by trying to get a warthog through a door, my fellow marines would gladly turn their weapons on me for killing one of them trying.

      Actually, there were two of us playing cooperative. They turned on both of us.

      I wonder what that would be like on legendary.
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    8. Re:Crazy! by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1

      They wouldn't take him. Kim Jong Il doesn't like competition in Whacko Land.

  4. Re:Payroll by Notquitecajun · · Score: 2, Funny

    He minus well = Jack Thompson is a sick puppy.

  5. Re:Payroll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He minus well... Does he now? Well, I'll have to see his report cards from second and third grade to decide how well he did on his plusses & take-aways.

    As for his legal actions, he does not law-guy well & I assure you they are completely on par with what would happen if a third grader received a law degree.
  6. I think he's aiming too high by faloi · · Score: 1

    The amount of money that Microsoft can bring in an effort to defend their position (and garner tons more publicity for Halo 3 and Xbox 360) is going to make life hard for Jack. And that's assuming that a judge doesn't just slap it down without too far through the process. I suppose it's too much to ask that he get on some medication to help keep him under control.

    --
    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    1. Re:I think he's aiming too high by nomadic · · Score: 1

      The amount of money that Microsoft can bring in an effort to defend their position (and garner tons more publicity for Halo 3 and Xbox 360) is going to make life hard for Jack.

      It's a pretty straightforward case; I don't think it matters how much you spend on this, it's all going to come down to a simple summary judgment at some point.

    2. Re:I think he's aiming too high by hauntingthunder · · Score: 1

      or sectioned if not disbared for bringing the legal profession into disrepute

      --
      You will never get to heaven with an Ak 47... But A Zu 30 is good for Low Flying Cherubim
    3. Re:I think he's aiming too high by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      or sectioned if not disbared for bringing the legal profession into disrepute In all fairness to Wacky Jackie, you can't pin THAT one on him.
  7. Taking on Take two is one thing by techpawn · · Score: 1

    But Bungie is part MSFT right? Also there is a big difference between blasting aliens and defending yourself against bullies. IF this works maybe he'll go after the America's Army game. That's more real military themed violence.

    --
    Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what your country did to you
  8. I'm getting tired of this... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He was funny a couple of years ago, but it's like an annoying joke that was funny at first and then starts driving you nuts. I wish he just shut up.

    1. Re:I'm getting tired of this... by techpawn · · Score: 3, Funny

      In soviet russia you drive jokes nuts...

      --
      Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what your country did to you
    2. Re:I'm getting tired of this... by jimstapleton · · Score: 4, Funny

      So, what you are saying is...

      Jack Thompson = Family Guy?

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    3. Re:I'm getting tired of this... by PlatyPaul · · Score: 1

      More like the Bananaphone....

      --
      Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    4. Re:I'm getting tired of this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jack Thompson == Chuck Norris? Whodathunked!

    5. Re:I'm getting tired of this... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, in slashdot memes you drive jokes nuts.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    6. Re:I'm getting tired of this... by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 1

      No, he's even worse than that time I was in court being defended by *insert 80's pop culture icon*.
       
      *cue wacky flashback*

      --
      I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
  9. More press? by Scutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why do we keep giving this guy air time? Enough with the Jack Thompson stories already.

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    1. Re:More press? by Hao+Wu · · Score: 1
      Wikipedia claims this guy "Jack" actually has a wife.

      I sincerely hope that she is really, really ugly.

      --
      I suggest you read Slashdot
    2. Re:More press? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia claims this guy "Jack" actually has a wife.

      I sincerely hope that she is really, really ugly. I sincerely hope that she isn't Ann Coulter. Think of the children!
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  10. I hope.. by GregPK · · Score: 1

    That Bungee pulls in a little cheat that makes fun of Jack Thompson. The guy is definately going to be remembered as the industry clown/thorn that doesn't go away. I wonder what his Wiki says about him.

    Looks like he's been doing his own editing as of late.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Thompson_(attorney)

    1. Re:I hope.. by PixelScuba · · Score: 1

      Jesus Christ... I read the segment about Thompson and Janet Reno, and it reads like a parody in a Hustler magazine. It is so insane and over the top that it can't possibly be true... can it?

    2. Re:I hope.. by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      I asked myself the same question, if it's true I have a lot more respect for Janet Reno given her reaction and subsequent success arising all the way to Attorney General of the United States. Makes me feel better about the world with Thompson falling flat on his ass while someone else with a more stable mentality goes on to succeed.

      Given everything else being said it wouldn't really surprise me if it was true though. Of course it's Wiki so you never really know. Thanks the stars for a good search engine and cross referencing. I'm not going to take the time to do it but it's still amusing to think about.

    3. Re:I hope.. by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1

      Last time I went to look at his wikipedia entry, I searched for 'Jack Thompson' and got the disambiguation page...which didn't list 'Jack Thompson (Attorney)' but instead 'Jack Thompson (Rabid Pedophile)' which linked to the former. xD (It was changed back and forth like ten times in the space of five minutes. Haha)

      --

      Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
    4. Re:I hope.. by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      In April 2007, only hours after the Virginia Tech shooting (and before Seung-Hui Cho was actually identified), Thompson claimed that the shooter had trained on the game Counter-Strike .[38] According to Thompson, the game "drills you and gives you scenarios on how to kill them [and] gets you to kill them with your heart rate lower." He says that Seung-Hui "was in a hyper-reality situation in virtual reality." Though Seung-Hui had last been known to have played Counter-Strike in high school, four years prior to the shooting, Thompson asserts that "you don't drop it when you go to college, typically." Thompson claims that Seung-Hui's roommate's claim that Seung-Hui only used his computer to write fiction is incorrect because "Cho was able to go room to room calmly, efficiently, coolly killing people."[95] Prior to being identified, Thompson attributed the "flat effect[sic] on [Seung-Hui's] face" and the efficiency of his attack to video game rehearsals of the shooting.[96] However, a search warrant released, listing the items found in Cho's dorm room, did not contain any video games, and a Washington Post story cited by Thompson later removed a paragraph stating that Seung-Hui enjoyed violent video games in high school. Thompson continued to maintain that "this is not rocket science. When a kid who has never killed anyone in his life goes on a rampage and looks like the Terminator, he's a video gamer." Thompson also sent a letter to Bill Gates, saying, "Mr. Gates, your company is potentially legally liable (for) the harm done at Virginia Tech. Your game, a killing simulator, according to the news that used to be in the Post, trained him to enjoy killing and how to kill." However, Microsoft did not create Counter-Strike - they only published the Xbox version of the game.[38] It should be noted that the only game of note in the official report was "Sonic the Hedgehog". Seems to me his article is about normal for his behavior.., hell, what am I saying, Thompson would never even relize that that segment is targeting him.

      (The quoted section is subject to the terms and condition of the GNU Free Documentation License)
      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
  11. Why is he still allowed to practice law? by nickj6282 · · Score: 1

    I'm really confused as to how this man continues to be able to practice law. I realize that any citizen (i.e. non-lawyer) can file a complaint or lawsuit, but how can a lawyer as grossly inept as Thompson continue to practice? He has proven himself to be antagonistic, inflammatory, and an outright liar on more occasions than I care to google for. Why has the Florida Bar not revoked his license to practice yet?

    I seem to recall him being thrown out of a courtroom in Alabama because he didn't even have the legal right to practice law there, which was brought to light because of his harassment and threats to the opposing lawyers. Seriously, why is it taking so long to get him out of there?

    I realize that Thompson is the offline version of an internet troll (although he trolls the internet aplenty as well). Maybe if we ignore him by not posting any more articles about him, he'll just go away? I fear not however. It seems as though Thompson is not actually interested in "protecting the children" just in being seen by someone somewhere.

    1. Re:Why is he still allowed to practice law? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Why has the Florida Bar not revoked his license to practice yet?

      Most of the people disbarred in Florida are done so because they basically took money from their clients that they weren't supposed to; the Bar's focus is usually on lawyers who abuse the attorney-client relationship.

    2. Re:Why is he still allowed to practice law? by nuzak · · Score: 4, Informative

      > I seem to recall him being thrown out of a courtroom in Alabama because he didn't even have the legal right to practice law there

      You don't need to be licensed in a state to practice there. You get admitted pro hac vice (literally "for the occasion"), and it's usually a rubberstamp thing as long as you have a valid license in another state. Thompson's behavior in the Alabama case was so abominable that he had his pro hac vice status revoked for that case, plus a requirement to attach the order to any further applications in Alabama. In other words, he's effectively been disbarred in that state.

      Keep in mind that if Wacko Jacko gets disbarred in Florida, it will almost certainly be a temporary suspension of his license. It's virtually unheard of for a lawyer to be permanently disbarred for misconduct that isn't a felony or blatant ethics violation. Jack may have committed the latter on occasion, but most of his pleadings these days aren't for any client but himself.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    3. Re:Why is he still allowed to practice law? by vertinox · · Score: 1

      I realize that Thompson is the offline version of an internet troll (although he trolls the internet aplenty as well). Maybe if we ignore him by not posting any more articles about him, he'll just go away? I fear not however. It seems as though Thompson is not actually interested in "protecting the children" just in being seen by someone somewhere.

      No. We've tried ignoring him and Main Stream Media didn't realize he was crazy and invited him to speak on Fox News for the Virginia Tech shooting where he spouts video games are to blame even before the killer is investigated.

      Listen... If you don't out him as the loony that he is, he is going to get more prime time interviews by people who don't understand the video game industry. If every time he gets on a soap box we shout "The Emperor has no clothes!" than Joe Six Pack and the MSM will stop taking him seriously.

      Of course MSM might enjoy him because of his controversy.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  12. Sometimes... by 644bd346996 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... Goliath actually manages to kill David.

    1. Re:Sometimes... by MarkTina · · Score: 1

      Well if you think about it, Goliath nearly always wins and then procedes to kick the crap out of Davids family, friends and dog...

  13. Hearing? by Aladrin · · Score: 1

    I hope he -does- get a hearing. And the next judge puts in a Bar complaint as well. And the next, and the next... Maybe then he'll be forced to stop wasting everyone's time and money. Permanently.

    Unfortunately, I think 'public nuisance' is way too strong a term for a video game, unless it includes subliminal messages to kill your parents and each your neighbor's dog. And even then, I think there are probably better terms for the criminal behavior involved.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    1. Re:Hearing? by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know what the grounds were for the last judge's complaint?

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    2. Re:Hearing? by rwven · · Score: 1

      public nuisance?

  14. There, fixed it for ya... by gzerphey · · Score: 1

    Thompson apparently feels embiggened to invoke Florida's public nuisance law against any video game he desires to target.

    --
    I don't have a microwave. I do, however, have a clock that occasionally cooks shit.
    1. Re:There, fixed it for ya... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess he thinks that what he's doing is quite cromulent.

  15. It is important to our cause to give publicity by netsavior · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Jack Thompson is the greatest asset we have in our fight to keep video games from being villified and banned/censored.

    The primary spokesperson of the anti-video game movement is clearly a psychopath. Completly batshit crazy. If he was not crazy, and used logical (sounding) conclusions and appealed to reasonable or religious sensibilities he would be MUCH more dangerous to free speech than he is.

    So we MUST give him lipservice, we must work to keep his illegal, crazy shenanagins in the news, because as long is he is their front-man, we will always win.

    1. Re:It is important to our cause to give publicity by Kierthos · · Score: 2, Funny

      I swear to God, I'll pistol whip the next guy that says 'shenanigans!'

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    2. Re:It is important to our cause to give publicity by netsavior · · Score: 1

      what's that place with the chedder poppers and all the goofy shit on the walls?

    3. Re:It is important to our cause to give publicity by Sciros · · Score: 1

      You mean Shenanigans?

      --
      I like basketball!!1!
    4. Re:It is important to our cause to give publicity by Captain+Spam · · Score: 1

      So in essence, he's kinda sorta a walking straw man argumentative fallacy. Except that this particular straw man wants to rush out and make his case himself, so you really can't blame his opposition for making the fallacy.

      --
      Demanding constant attention will only lead to attention.
    5. Re:It is important to our cause to give publicity by soulsteal · · Score: 1

      Shenanigans...

    6. Re:It is important to our cause to give publicity by darkmayo · · Score: 1

      I think alot of people would rather him be the insane spokesperson for antigaming because he discredits the antigamers without us having to lift a finger.

      But we arent really convincing anyone that games arent the vile tool of the devil like JT wants them to think, they just think he's a douche.

      Just because the antigamer rep is a meat ball, doesnt mean the pro-gamer side is getting good press. We need to work at having parents understand the ESRB, have to work with companies to make them see that games arent just for kids, and even tho the industry makes billions each year, video games are quite misunderstood. The medium is still in its infancy, like film and television before it. Its up to the people who enjoy games to step up to the plate and push games as something good.

      Personally I think violent, gory games and games that are of a more mature nature should be regulated to keep them out of minors hands, unless there parent buys it for them.

      --
      "I am a kernel in the linux army"
    7. Re:It is important to our cause to give publicity by db32 · · Score: 1

      I would like to offer my sympathy for you now. By having a logical and rational response to a hot button issue you have condemned yourself to ridicule from both sides. Welcome to reality my friend. Judges, lawyers, and courtrooms are more meaningful than mom's, dad's, and livingrooms. God forbid we expect parents to do their job and give them the tools to do so (Rating systems, age limits). Last I checked every gaming console and TV ever produced had a power button, or in the worst case scenario a damned plug. "But waaaa, we can't control what our kids do elsewhere, we want the government to do it" boo freaking hoo...it has been that way since Adam fucked Eve...kids escape the parents eye and kill their brother to make God happy...should we ban the Bible too (ok lets not get too far on that one). The whole damned point is you teach your kids acceptable and unacceptable behavior so that when they ARE outside of your eye you can (reasonably) trust them to (mostly) make the right decision. Its like all these people have totally forgot what it was like growing up.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    8. Re:It is important to our cause to give publicity by Golgothaa86 · · Score: 1

      I swear to god ill pistol whip the next guy who says shenanigans! Hey Farva......

    9. Re:It is important to our cause to give publicity by netsavior · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll bite and go one step further...
      Ratings systems are for lazy parents.

      My son, who happens to love video games is not yet 3 years old. I could not give 2 shits about what the rating says, he is disturbed by some "child friendly" content, and not disturbed by some "Teen to adult" content. They don't know my kid, they don't know my morals, they are doing their best to convey some sort of moral average. Content is subjective. What is right for my kid is not right for other kids, the only I can actually regulate what he sees, and how he reacts to it is to *gasp* be involved in his daily life.
      Of course it is easy for me because I love games so I am automatically involved there, but I have watched a lot of shows that I hate and read a lot of books that are annoying, because I am a dedicated parent.

      I'm not sure I have a solution to the problem, but a ratings system will be about as effective as telling parents they need to try harder. Ratings systems are an attempt to qantify a subjective concept of "morality" which is impossible.

    10. Re:It is important to our cause to give publicity by AgentSmith · · Score: 1

      You mean Shenanigans?

      [*Pistol Whip* *whip* *whip* *whip* *whip* *whip* *whip* *whip* *whip* *whip* *whip* ]

      WHEW! That should do it.

      As for ol' Jack? *yawn*
      Keep watching him like an old blind dog that likes to growl at people who walk by.

    11. Re:It is important to our cause to give publicity by db32 · · Score: 1

      Not really. Look at most movie ratings. They aren't just R. There is the sub part that says WHY they got R. (Violence, Language, Nudity, etc). Ratings certainly are not a panacea, but it is a useful tool to give parents a quick gauge of content. It is still a parents responsibility to screen the content, but why make them waste $60 on Super Mega Happy Fun with the Happy Fun Animal Team game at the store only to bring it home and find that it is actually a japanese furry fetish game. It would be nice to see a "Rated OMFG: You just don't want to see this shit" somewhere on the package. (a bit over the top, but it makes the point more amusing)

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    12. Re:It is important to our cause to give publicity by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      When it comes to protecting our rights to free expression, we don't have to be sporting about it. Politics is war, and in war "fair play" is not a legitimate consideration.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    13. Re:It is important to our cause to give publicity by Wylfing · · Score: 1

      Shen-- Ow!

      --
      Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
    14. Re:It is important to our cause to give publicity by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1

      I'll bite and go one step further...
      Ratings systems are for lazy parents. Conker's Bad Fur Day "looks" like a standard "furry-style" cartoon similar to other games from Rareware. If the ESRB rating (or similar informal rating) is not present, the parents will have no idea that the game will contain scatological humour, strings of profanity, and other questionable content unless you see enough of the game being played. (A quick glance of the game won't do it - you risk missing the scenes in question, or may be instead impressed by the surfboard race.)

      That game does display the message "For mature audiences only" when it starts up, but I thought they were kidding.

    15. Re:It is important to our cause to give publicity by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      That game does display the message "For mature audiences only" when it starts up, but I thought they were kidding. At what point were you convinced otherwise? The flower with anime-scale knockers, the implied bee/flower sex with same, or was it the great mighty poo?
    16. Re:It is important to our cause to give publicity by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1

      At what point were you convinced otherwise? The flower with anime-scale knockers, the implied bee/flower sex with same, or was it the great mighty poo? The initial bar scene with the drunk squirrel looked okay, as did the rest of the introduction level. After that, there was a long string of bleeped profanity.
  16. Where do I start? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, I'm seriously confused here. Is he doing this out of genuine concern for the public? Is he doing this strictly for publicity himself? Is he doing this because he's batshiat insane? Or is he doing this at the behest of his puppet masters?

    I'm not one who supports violence in any way, but does this man have ANY usefullness for the rest of humanity? Other than producing CO2 for the plants to use, is there any reason he should still exist?

    1. Re:Where do I start? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Ok, I'm seriously confused here. Is he doing this out of genuine concern for the public? "

      In the same way that Fred Phelps does his thing out of concern for God...

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  17. Clinically insane. by singingjim1 · · Score: 0

    He repeats the same actions over and over again expecting a different outcome. The man is obviously insane and should be treated as such. He really does need professional help but, unfortunately, intelligent sociopaths like him rarely get the help they desperately need. People just write them off as wackos and ignore them, rightfully so I guess, but someone close to him really should try to get him some help. Even if it means committal.

    1. Re:Clinically insane. by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Calling him a sociopath is, IMO, an insult to sociopaths. From what I've read, they tend to mimic "normal" people in order to lead a quiet, unassuming life. Thompson is anything but; in fact, he might have some form of dementia. :)

    2. Re:Clinically insane. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I've read, they tend to mimic "normal" people in order to lead a quiet, unassuming life.

      Yeah being low key does tend to work best. Having various body parts and entrails overflowing from the trash container does tend to arouse the suspicions of the neighbors. And then gosh-darn it you end up with even more body parts and entrails. It's a vicious circle I tell you.

    3. Re:Clinically insane. by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Having various body parts and entrails overflowing from the trash container does tend to arouse the suspicions of the neighbors.

      I think it goes without saying that you're doing it wrong.

  18. A personal request to the editors by InfinityWpi · · Score: 1

    Can we please start ignoring Jack Thompson and not posting anything about him anymore? All you're doing is showing that someone cares about what he does. Ignore him and he'll wither and die, deprived of attention like a flower deprived of light and water.

    1. Re:A personal request to the editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignore him and he'll wither and die, deprived of attention like a flower deprived of light and water.

      Actually, he's more like an aggressive, invasive weed: ignore him and pretty soon your lawn will be overrun by his lot.

  19. Re:Payroll by Baby+Duck · · Score: 4, Informative

    He minus well get paid by Take two and Microsoft.

    minus well? MINUS WELL? It's "might as well".

    --

    "Love heals scars love left." -- Henry Rollins

  20. JT = Covenant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finish the fight. Please, just get this bastard to shut up.

  21. Boycott all Jack Thompson articles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boycott all Jack Thompson articles.

    Do it now.

  22. Re:Payroll by GrayCalx · · Score: 5, Funny

    He minus well ...

    Brilliant. Truly brilliant. The best part is its not even close to the actual letters for the word(s) he meant to say. So I take that to mean he really believes thats what people are saying when they use that phrase. That cracked me up, seriously, that had me Latching Out Lard.

  23. Re:Payroll by EvanED · · Score: 1

    So now not only are people and companies campaigning for things that MS wants (like SCO to win) shills, but so are the people and companies campaigning against MS?

    Ah /., how I love thee.

  24. How he could get it banned by MikeRT · · Score: 1, Funny

    Just say that it promotes racism by having human beings mercilessly kill aliens. If that is not a **race** war, I don't know what is.

    Hey, this shit works for Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, right?

    1. Re:How he could get it banned by jma05 · · Score: 1

      Not Halo 3. You can wreck mayhem as the alien as well as human. And flood is not a very race based society. They are pluralistic and open minded. They subsume any race.

  25. Re:Payroll by king-manic · · Score: 1

    Mea Culpa. when the coffee is scarce, the mind does silly things.

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  26. Unconstitutional by cthulu_mt · · Score: 1
    From TFA:

    ...tend[s] to annoy the community, injure the health of the citizens in general, or corrupt the public morals

    The law seems unconstitutionally vague; suprising that the judge didn't comment on that the first time around.
    --
    Virginia is for lovers. EVE is for griefers.
  27. Re:Payroll by geeknado · · Score: 1

    Because, you know, nobody'd heard of Halo 3 before Mr. Thompson took an interest. This is actually reflective of the reverse-- Thompson's not going to address The Darkness, despite its graphic depictions of heart rending and whatnot. Rather, he's going to target the most popular franchises which feature significant violence-- Halo being amongst those, this is hardly surprising.

  28. WTF? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    How the hell does a guy going through disbarment proceedings still get to go around filing nuisance suits?

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:WTF? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      A couple ways, one I don't think that one is banned from doing so until one has been disbarred, being in proceedings isn't sufficient. I could be wrong about that. Two, one can always file suits on ones own behalf as one has the right to represent oneself in legal proceedings. The law license just allows you to represent other people.

      But the standard precaution does apply a man who represents himself has a fool for a client.

    2. Re:WTF? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      How the hell does a guy going through disbarment proceedings still get to go around filing nuisance suits?

      He can still practice law up until he's actually disbarred. Anyway, he filed the case on behalf of himself, and even a disbarred lawyer can file lawsuits pro se.

    3. Re:WTF? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Actually, in this case, the precaution is that ANYONE who represents Whacko Jacko has a fool for a client...

  29. Public Nuisance? by sunderland56 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    With Bully, Jack Thompson had a sliver of a case - that children in a private school might buy the game and start emulating it in real life by beating up their classmates.

    Similarly, he might have a case with GTA:Vice City, where people in Las Vegas might buy the game and then start randomly shooting people and stealing cars.

    But Halo 3? What, the astronauts on the International Space Station might play the game, and then start shooting each other in real life?? And even if they do, how is that a public nuisance?

    1. Re:Public Nuisance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Small nitpick ...GTA:Vice City, where people in Las Vegas...

      Vice City was more of a Miami type city.

      GTA:San Andreas had a Vegas like city, as well as a San Francisco like city. Both were only available when the story line progressed to a certain point. Different points for each city, well, unless you jumped a fence or roadblock. If you did that you would be lucky to live longer than a few moments.

    2. Re:Public Nuisance? by vimh42 · · Score: 1

      Master Chief now wears diapers.

  30. Re:Payroll by monkeySauce · · Score: 1

    There is no well there to subtract.

    Jack Thompson = sick puppy, before you even begin.

  31. Never an officer around when you need one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where's a taser-wielding police officer when you really need one?

  32. Who the hell cares? by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 1

    If we all would just ignore this nutjob, he'd eventually go away.

    --
    sudo eat my shorts
    1. Re:Who the hell cares? by Orange+Crush · · Score: 1

      If we all would just ignore this nutjob, he'd eventually go away.

      Why in the world would we want that? God forbid he actually does go away and leave room for someone vaguely rational to carry the torch who might actually be capable of doing damage.

    2. Re:Who the hell cares? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      and leave room for someone vaguely rational to carry the torch who might actually be capable of doing damage.

            Well, that rules out Hillary Clinton, too...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:Who the hell cares? by pokerdad · · Score: 1

      If we all would just ignore this nutjob, he'd eventually go away.

      If by "we all" you mean the main stream media, then sure. If you mean Slashdot, then no.

      I'm sure he doesn't know or care how much coverage he gets on a website meant for the very people he opposes.

    4. Re:Who the hell cares? by Criterion · · Score: 1

      Umm, call me crazy, but I would think they would actually have to have a point to be any kind of a threat at all. Then again, the public spectacle he's making of himself may be enough in and of itself, to keep others off that path.

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
  33. not racism... by Devir · · Score: 1

    Racism is between members of the same species. As far as we know the aliens are a completely different species. You could say the game promotes genocide and specieism if that is even a word.

    1. Re:not racism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ack, no; you're using the *modern* (i.e. fallacious) definition of 'race'. Humanity is a race, but there's no 'white race' or 'black race'.
      Oh, and Thompson is an assclown.

    2. Re:not racism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Oh, and Thompson is an assclown.

      I think you mean "asstunnel"

  34. Re:Payroll by amuro98 · · Score: 1

    Agreed. I think with this latest move his, it's quite clear that Jack Thomson is nothing more than a clandestine marketing tool. Just think about all the thousands of people who will now learn about Halo3 who would normally have been ignorant of the game.

    All he has to do is take Microsoft to court, then suddenly announce an "out of court" settlement, in which Microsoft pays for his services, and then this troll is off to attack his next "client".

    Microsoft, meanwhile, will have received millions of dollars in free advertising around the world.

  35. Please Don't Feed The Trolls by zodar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can we stop giving Jack Thompson coverage so he can slide back under his rock and disappear?

  36. Disbarment proceedings? by sinner6 · · Score: 1

    According to wikipedia disbarment proceedings were filed, but doesn't mention any resolution.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Thompson_(attorney)#The_Florida_Bar

    I know the law can move really slow but how long do such proceedings take? Any court watchers have any inside info or analysis?

  37. Self-describing by orkysoft · · Score: 2, Funny

    IMHO Jack Thompson is a nuisance to the public himself.

    --

    I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  38. Re:Payroll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You know, it just struck me after reading a few of the posts on the gamepolitics site. There's a saying about "following the money." One of the things he has consistently complained about is the lack of age-verification when purchasing online; citing that a credit card is not enough. He says:

    "Age ID software is available to Best Buy, Target, and Wal-Mart, and they refuse to use it"

    It really makes me wonder how he benefits financially from these publicity stunts. I get the feeling that he has an investment in an age-verification company, or that they at least are paying him to keep bringing up these frivolous suits. Has anyone looked into this? Along those lines, did he build up a huge nest-egg from being a legitimate lawyer in the past? How can he afford to waste everyone's time and money?

  39. Did you read the complaint? by strredwolf · · Score: 4, Funny

    I took a look through it, and one thing struck me odd:

    Jack says (in the lawsuit filing) that the release date for Halo 3 is: October 25th, 2007.

    Real release date? Tomorrow.

    FAIL, Jack. FAIL.

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
    1. Re:Did you read the complaint? by blueturffan · · Score: 1
      I consulted three calendars and this line

      by strredwolf (532) on Mon Sep 24, '07 11:40 AM (#20731497)

      and I am quite certain that tomorrow will be September 25th.

    2. Re:Did you read the complaint? by glindsey · · Score: 1

      Jack says (in the lawsuit filing) that the release date for Halo 3 is: October 25th, 2007.

      Real release date? Tomorrow. "Oh man, I can't believe we spaced on the date!"
    3. Re:Did you read the complaint? by Asmor · · Score: 1

      Please feel free to consult a reading comprehension guide. Or Gamestop's website. Whichever.

    4. Re:Did you read the complaint? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Halo 3 is released tomorrow. Sept 25. Jack made a boo boo.

    5. Re:Did you read the complaint? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *sigh* I feel pity... Check the month.

  40. Re:Payroll by thesandtiger · · Score: 4, Funny

    Or he's using voice recognition software in Vista.

    Eye yam woozy-sing hat cane clotbear.

    --
    Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
  41. Unfortunately so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Game software has resulted in too much frivolity.

  42. Re:Payroll by Monchanger · · Score: 2, Funny

    The best argument against posting corrections on posters' spelling and grammar (and whatever the hell this was): Slashdot readers believe your comment was informative.

  43. Well then ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does that mean someone can legally declare Jack Thompson as a nuisance?

  44. The real public nusiance by jelton · · Score: 2, Funny

    Jack Thompson is the real public nusiance.

    --
    I am not a lawyer. This post does not constitute any form of legal advice.
  45. Re:Payroll by SpectreBlofeld · · Score: 1

    So I take that to mean he really believes thats what people are saying when they use that phrase. Not necessarily. I sometimes do the same thing while in super-fast-typing-frenzy mode; sometimes a word will come out with a phonetic analog than the actual word I was trying to type. I think it has something to do with being able to think much faster than it's possible to type, and poor fingers that struggle to keep up. Never seems to happen if I slow down, though. That's why proofreading is important :)

  46. "Minus well" by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

    I actually read it as some kind of double plus good 1984 reference...

  47. Re:Payroll by db32 · · Score: 1

    I suspect this was actually a case of typing faster than you can think. You minus well admit it now.

    --
    The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
  48. Re:Payroll by EvolutionsPeak · · Score: 1

    Come on, everyone makes mcsteaks. Give the guy a breke. Minus whale add it to the Internet lingo.

  49. Re:Payroll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    minus well? MINUS WELL? It's "might as well".

    I thought he meant "midas well". You know, that bottomless pit full of gold?

    -mcgrew

  50. FYI by BytePusher · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I read through Mr. Thomson's COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND FOR BREACH OF AGREEMENT to see what he was complaining about. Otherwise he is seeking legal action for Best Buy not obeying a settlement they agreed upon:

    13. When plaintiff first filed an action similar to this in Miami-Dade Circuit Court it was against defendant Best Buy to stop the sale of "Mature-rated" video games at its stores to customers under the age of 17. Best Buy settled that suit by agreeing to henceforth age ID any customer who appeared to be 21 years of age or younger in order to intercept and prevent any sales to anyone under 17. Best Buy announced this new policy nationwide.

    I'm not a lawyer, but I think this is the "Breach of Agreement" part of his complaint. I suspect he has a case for this portion of his complaint.

    Below is the stuff about the game itself:

    9. Halo 3 is a video game that allows the virtual reality player to rehearse violent acts resulting in the death of one's virtual victims. Lee Boyd Malvo, the younger of the two "DC Beltway Snipers" was trained on Halo to kill residents within Virginia, Maryland, and Washington, D.C. His "mentor," John Muhammad, knew the efficacy of the first Halo video game in this regard, because the Army in which he served used this same murder simulator to train snipers to kill. Malvo learned well on Halo.

    10. The role of Microsoft's Halo in the "DC Beltway Snipings" was reported on NBC News and was introduced into evidence in the trial of Lee Boyd Malvo.

    11. The proof as to the causal nexus between violence simulation video games and real-world violence is legion, but one of the more notable proofs is found in the August 2005 Report of the American Psychological Association that establishes the direct causal link between violent teenaged video game play and teenagers' aggression. The recent U. S. Supreme Court case of Roper v. Simmons, which struck down the juvenile death penalty, cites the brain scan studies similar to those coming out of Harvard, Indiana, and Michigan State Universities that prove that these violent games are processed in a different part of the brain in adolescents and teens than in adults, and it is the sector of the brain that leads of teen violence copycatting these violent games like Halo 3.

    1. Re:FYI by Kesch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OMG! You mean I can train to be a sniper with Halo! I never knew it was so easy. Screw the long hard training to be a sniper in the army; I'm going to go get me a copy of Halo and be a pro in no time. This immediately brings a few questions to mind though. For instances, which Halo should I train on? In the PC version, you have to lead with the sniper rifle, in the Xbox version you do not. I can see this making a difference. Secondly, where are the analog sticks on my gun? I'm having a hard time finding them.

      --
      If this signature is witty enough, maybe somebody will like me.
    2. Re:FYI by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      Yes I certainly insist upon training snipers with a game that doesn't even have a prone position.

    3. Re:FYI by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      Apart from Thompson's own rantings and the articles quoting him, I can't find anything linking Halo to these two killers. Has anyone got a link that is exclusive of Thompson?

    4. Re:FYI by minister+of+funk · · Score: 1

      Did JT go after Microsoft Flight Simulator, too?

    5. Re:FYI by Gideon+Fubar · · Score: 1

      no, because they probably don't exist.

      --
      http://www.xkcd.com/354/
    6. Re:FYI by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

      Yeah and how do I hit stuff while hopping around like a maniac? OMG AIMBOT FAGGOT GET OFF MY FACE

  51. Re:Payroll by adamstew · · Score: 1

    Halo isn't particularly violent...I mean yeah...there is guns, and shooting, and death, and destruction...but it's still nothing more than cartoon violence...It's been a while since i've played Halo, and Halo 2, but I don't remember there being blood on the screen. Perhaps there is now in Halo 3?

    I think the cartoon violence makes it PG-13...but no blood, in a game that is clearly fantasy with no sexual or adult themes...just taking down an alien race...Certainly he has better games to go after... Halo 3 is just one of the biggest ones there are.

  52. Where does he get the money from? by MLCT · · Score: 1

    Obviously he doesn't have lawyer costs, but he dose have court costs and the other financial penalties (such as loosing a case and being forced to pay the other sides costs). Where is the money coming to fund all of this? Have far right "moral authority" groups set up a slush fund for him? Filing suit after suit can't go on for ever.

  53. Re:Payroll by jez9999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How about weaning yourself off that addiction? Seriously, it's bizarre how Americans can be so zealously anti-drug, and yet treat a caffeine addiction as 'just something that most people have'.

  54. READ HIS LAWSUIT by unixluv · · Score: 1

    If anyone bothered to read his lawsuit, he is not out to ban the game. What he wants is MS and Best Buy to not sell it to anyone under 18. As a parent, I can respect that.

    --
    Overrated, Troll, and Flamebait mod points are not to be used towards posts you disagree with. That IS censorship.
    1. Re:READ HIS LAWSUIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What he wants is MS and Best Buy to not sell it to anyone under 18. As a parent, I can respect that.
      Microsoft and Best Buy didn't have your child. You did.

      We're not about to change basic freedoms for your sake, nor "for the children".

    2. Re:READ HIS LAWSUIT by MuckSavage · · Score: 1

      Not to be a jerk, but why is Jack Thompson/teh US Government responsible for raising your kids? Shouldn't you be doing that?

    3. Re:READ HIS LAWSUIT by unixluv · · Score: 1

      We don't let kids rent pr0n or see X rated movies either. I don't see the difference. I fully support MS's and Best Buy's right to produce and sell. However, as a parent, I should have the right to veto what my child can see and do until he is 18.

      --
      Overrated, Troll, and Flamebait mod points are not to be used towards posts you disagree with. That IS censorship.
    4. Re:READ HIS LAWSUIT by 3p1ph4ny · · Score: 1

      Yep.

    5. Re:READ HIS LAWSUIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Helicopter Parent Alert!!!

      Your logic fails at the point when you realize that "bad" for your kids doesn't mean "bad" for my kids. pRon overwhelmingly is "bad" in the public eyes (for minors), so it is a piss poor example. Pick another "THINK OF THE KIDS" route please.

      There is _nothing_ wrong with video games so long as the kids know it is a game. My kids, for instance, know that the coyote falling from a cliff is not real and that repeating this in real life has "bad" consequences. Same thing with Counterstrike. My kids are capable of learning this (from me and from experience).

      Don't fight to set rules for the state to babysit mine. Your want for non-intervention in your kids' lives now breaks into my intervention (e.g. You don't have to police your kids' content, whereas in your world, I have to actively attain mine's). The default action should be the more lenient/lax, which includes letting them experience and choose their paths. They know what they want! Let them live and learn. Believe it or not, forcing them (or anyone) into some self-prescribed utopia typically doesn't end as expected.

      You may not agree with my opinion(s), but damned if I want MY parenting ability taken from me and given to any state or government.

    6. Re:READ HIS LAWSUIT by nuzak · · Score: 1

      > I should have the right to veto what my child can see and do until he is 18.

      You misspelled "your". That is, after all, what you meant, right?

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    7. Re:READ HIS LAWSUIT by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1

      What he wants is MS and Best Buy to not sell it to anyone under 18. As a parent, I can respect that. Halo is rated 'M' for Mature - this age group, if you interpret it as a strict guideline, allows children aged 17-years to play the game. If you instead follow the fulltext of the Esrb rating guide which says "Titles rated M (Mature) have content that may be suitable for persons ages 17 and older", it still allows 17-year-old children to play the game (and possibly younger children since the ESRB guideline doesn't say that children udner 17 should not play the game.)

      As a parent, you shouldn't respect such an enforcement, as it overrides the rating accepted by society and the industry. If there is a dispute over the accurracy of the rating, there is a venue for that - you can ask Rockstar for more information on their involvement with these disputes.

    8. Re:READ HIS LAWSUIT by renegadesx · · Score: 1

      Exactly, I was playing Wolf 3D in primary school, you dont see me pulling a sweet ass chain gun on anybody.

      It really wouldnt supprise me if he tried to ban Mario Kart because it encouraged reckless driving ...shit, shouldnt be giving him ideas

      --
      Make SELinux enforcing again!
    9. Re:READ HIS LAWSUIT by festers · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As a parent, I'll decide what my kids can and cannot play/read/listen to. Not a corporation and certainly not a lunatic lawyer.

      --


      -------
      "Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief."
    10. Re:READ HIS LAWSUIT by unixluv · · Score: 1


      You all are missing the point. It is already a law in florida where he lives. All he wants is enforcement of the law. If you don't like the law, get it changed by legal means. Calling someone a lunatic for enforcement of a law that has passed the legislative body is stupid.

      --
      Overrated, Troll, and Flamebait mod points are not to be used towards posts you disagree with. That IS censorship.
    11. Re:READ HIS LAWSUIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you missed the point of the person you thought missed the point.

      You shouldn't require the government to step in with laws to dictate what your kids should or should not be exposed to. It's your job to do so when you feel it's appropriate.

      Difficult? Maybe. But if it's too hard for you, why not give up your kids to the government to raise them fully?

    12. Re:READ HIS LAWSUIT by Gideon+Fubar · · Score: 1

      Relax, he's only attempting to facilitate a ban through a legal pathway (which he himself had a hand in creating). That doesn't mean he's trying to have an existing law enforced, it means he's attempting to have the law applied to a product that it does not yet apply to, and (in this particular case) he really doesn't have much of a chance of succeeding..

      --
      http://www.xkcd.com/354/
  55. Re:Payroll by king-manic · · Score: 1

    How about weaning yourself off that addiction? Seriously, it's bizarre how Americans can be so zealously anti-drug, and yet treat a caffeine addiction as 'just something that most people have'.

    It's more of an expression. I'm a tea drinker and don't really need it to wake up. But I often make typos and messed up grammar due to dyslexia so if I don't' have enough time before a post it has numerous grammatical errors.

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  56. Oh good GOD... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    From Wikipedia: Thompson describes himself as a Christian conservative and a Republican.

    "Christian Conservative" is an oxymoron. So is "Christian Republican". From The Bible (King James Version):

    Luke 6:24 "But woe unto you that are rich! for ye have received your consolation."

    Luke 11:46 "And he [Jesus] said, Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers."

    Luke 11:52 "Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered."

    And that's just a few choice quotes from a single book. And guess what? God doesn't like bankers much, either (but that's a different topic).

    -mcgrew

  57. Re:Payroll by geeknado · · Score: 1
    Well, it's violent in that it has guns and death. It's not particularly graphic-- that's actually why I compared it to the Darkness specifically, since that game /is/ very graphic, actually sold pretty well, but isn't from a big franchise...So it isn't even on Thompson's radar.

    The post I was replying to seemed to imply that somehow Microsoft must be funding Thompson in some sort of wacky marketing scheme...I find that idea pretty ludicrous. Then again, most of Thompson's stated positions are pretty ludicrous, so perhaps I shouldn't be so dismissive. :)

  58. Vexatious litigant by CountBrass · · Score: 1

    In the UK there is the concept of a vexatious litigant, if the court decides you are one then you can no-longer initiate legal action of any kind. I assume that is the case in the US and was wondering if there were moves afoot to have Jack Thompson declared one?

    --
    Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    1. Re:Vexatious litigant by nomadic · · Score: 1

      In the UK there is the concept of a vexatious litigant, if the court decides you are one then you can no-longer initiate legal action of any kind. I assume that is the case in the US and was wondering if there were moves afoot to have Jack Thompson declared one?

      There is such a concept. The only cases I've seen it happen, however, is where the litigant went to extremes, well beyond where even Thompson has gone.

  59. Re:Payroll by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's been that way for decades. "Just say NO!" while gulping down an aspirin, antihistamine, Alka-Seltzer, Viagra, Prozac, amphetamine cocktail, and chasing it with a martini and a cigarette. Yeah, we hate drugs in this country.

  60. Glad to see him again by ^_^x · · Score: 1

    Seriously. If he just laid low for a while, people would start to forget about him. If he keeps spamming the courts whenever a new game comes out, he'll just dig himself deeper and deeper into the hole where his credibility used to be.

    KEEP 'EM COMIN' JACK! WHAT? BEJEWELLED TEACHES KIDS TO BECOME JEWEL THIEVES? BRILLIANT! TAKE IT TO THE SUPREME COURT! GOOD LUCK TO YA! ...fool. XD

  61. GTA, Bully, Halo, and then... by oahazmatt · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thompson: As you can see, this so-called "game" features underlying propoganda...
    Judge: ...where?
    Thompson: ...Veiled commands of violence against others...
    Judge: What?
    Thompson: ...and subliminal messages designed to turn our children into soulless killing machines.
    Judge: I'm sorry, I don't see it. The court finds in favor of the defendent. Viva Pinata may remain on shelves.

    --
    Those who believe the Internet is private,
    find their privates are on the Internet.
  62. Summary is Wrong by mpapet · · Score: 1

    Parent is right. Summary is wrong and deserves a re-write.

    The core problem with all of the negative comments about the guy is he has already affect the laws and access to video games in Florida.

    I know it's going to fall on deaf ears, but you have to watch out for these guys. They start crazy and somehow gather followers that make them crazier. In this case there is a plenty of morally superior, let's regulate your personal life politically active people that don't have to agree with everything he's saying/doing, but will get behind him because of some strongly held principal they agree with.

    Take him seriously otherwise he'll be regulating more than just Floridian's personal lives.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  63. Re:Payroll by Criterion · · Score: 1

    Well at least it's an original improper phrase. Way, way too often do I see "for all intensive purposes" instead of "for all intents and purposes". I mean a typo is one thing, but at least understand a simple phrase before you use it.

    --
    We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
  64. Re:Payroll by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    Mea Culpa. when the coffee is scarce, the mind does silly things. It's good to see you accepting responsibility for starting what has every chance of becoming a new Internet meme.
    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  65. Ad Campaign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What really *WAS* a nuisance was the Halo 3 ad campaign. SHUT UP already!

  66. Re:Payroll by FreakinSyco · · Score: 2, Funny

    Its a doggy dog world out here. Theirs no room for bad grammar in todays business world.

  67. Florida Nuisance Law by EricTheMad · · Score: 1

    ...tend[s] to annoy the community, injure the health of the citizens in general, or corrupt the public morals Sounds like a perfect description of Jack Thompson.
    --
    -- Remember, we're not happy until you're not happy. -- Local FAA Inspector --
    1. Re:Florida Nuisance Law by Nahor · · Score: 1

      ...tend[s] to annoy the community, injure the health of the citizens in general, or corrupt the public morals
      Sounds like a perfect description of Jack Thompson.
      Exactly what I was thinking too. Can someone in Florida sue Jack Thompson under the nuisance law, please?
  68. is this a bad thing by richardellisjr · · Score: 1

    Seriously I'm not sure I'd be against this if it keeps the 13 year olds out of the game. I'm tired of getting my ass handed to me by someone whose balls haven't even dropped :-)

  69. StupidHow can he not be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he really believed that these games caused so much trouble then why not go after a stricter rating system. The Entertainment Software Rating Board is in place to judge games and to decide the appropriate maturity level of the player. So it seems like he just wants to rattle on about how bad games are and not focus on the organization that might be able to change things. However, I personally I do not see a problem with these games and there currently is no supporting evidence to link any harm to playing them; which leaves Mr. Thompson making a lot of noise and trying to get people to see his view point or join is cause. Hopefully people are smarter and will just stop paying attention to him so he will go away. However, it seems like we like watching him try or enjoy complaining about him so I dont see him going away anytime soon. Which is just to bad.

  70. Re:Payroll by nuzak · · Score: 1

    > I don't remember there being blood on the screen. Perhaps there is now in Halo 3?

    There's quite a bit of blood, but it's all blue.

    Clearly, Jack is looking out for the Covenant -- someone has to! In fact, he fashions himself something of a prophet, whereas I rather liken him to a shrieking little grunt.

    --
    Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  71. Red Dot on Forehead by monkeyhand · · Score: 1

    Me thinks it would seem unwise to draw the ire of a million die-hard Halo fans who have spent these last years practicing their sharp-shooting techniques on Halo 2.

    1. Re:Red Dot on Forehead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and then he would be proved more-or-less right.

  72. For a second there.. by Araxen · · Score: 1

    I thought I was on Digg. Jack Thompson stories every other hour there and I'm surprised to see Thompson to get any attention here. I thought Slashdot was smarter than to give this idiot any attention at all.

    I hope we don't start seeing Ron Paul stories next!

    1. Re:For a second there.. by EricTheMad · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I thought Slashdot was smarter than to give this idiot any attention at all. You must be new here. Slashdot is made up entirely of idiots seeking the attention of other idiots by posting clever responses to stories or other peoples comments. If you don't believe me, just read this post again.
      --
      -- Remember, we're not happy until you're not happy. -- Local FAA Inspector --
  73. Re:Payroll by TheForgotton · · Score: 1

    I figured it was a nair or from usings peach detections oft wair. Drag on naturallys pea king sometimes goof sup.

  74. public nuisance by OVDoobie · · Score: 2, Funny

    Someone should file a public nuisance claim on Jack Thompson. This guys is an idiot, and it might rub off on our kids. Think of the Children for crying out loud.

  75. I submit he's getting paid by game companies by IamWasabi · · Score: 1

    It's just hard for me to believe someone, even someone as crazy as Jack Thompson, would keep going like this. For me the cause is one of two: Either he simply likes being in the news, OR He's being paid by game publishers to pull out these insane suits and therefore generate attention for the game. Let the conspiracy theories flourish.

    --
    [/war] "All the world's a stage, And all the men and women merely players."
    1. Re:I submit he's getting paid by game companies by GeckoAddict · · Score: 1

      The only publicity that such a suit can generate is bad for sales. In the case of Halo, everyone who even remotely pays attention to the video game world knows what it is and what's it about (in part due to Microsoft's $10 million dollar advertising campaign [I'm pretty sure I read this in a news article]), so there is little to be gained. What such a suit can do, however, is make all the parents think twice before allowing their kids to buy it. If parents heard is was violent enough for a lawsuit, surely it must be too violent for their kids, and they didn't bother to give it an actual chance.

  76. Agreed, don't become complacent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While I don't necessarily agree with the swipe at Florida (I don't disagree either, it's just irrelevant), I agree in spirit. While he has become as tiresome as a spoiled child that has yet to be disciplined (though the Bar is finally waking up to his antics), until he is unable to practice law, he is still a threat to freedom. We must not allow complacency to settle in, every time he rears his fool head, the public needs to be reminded as to what a self-serving, shallow, narcissistic, delusional danger he is, until no-one pays him heed again.

    That being said: GO AWAY JACK! You're only making a greater fool of yourself!

  77. He's brilliant... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    At least, I assume that he gets paid by Microsoft for making them look good on /.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  78. Manhunt 2 by Lampe+is+Awesome · · Score: 1

    If Mr. Thompson really wanted to have his case considered, he might try going after a game that is getting some really, really negative attention from parental watchdog groups. This game of course would be Manhunt 2, which, if anything like it predecessor, is excessively, even sickeningly violent. I stopped playing it due to the violence, and I was 20 years old. If children get their hands on that game, the images they see could do real harm, unlike the ones in Halo 3, which depict violence against aliens, not people. If he wants help in his cause, he should at least make the game he goes after a justifiable target.

    --
    Let the Wookie Win!
  79. Re:Payroll by timmarhy · · Score: 1

    you junkies all miss the point - it's about stamping out ILLEGAL DRUGS. you know stuff cooked up in a backyard shed with fuck knows what mixed in for effect. it doesn't even compare to commercial drugs.

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  80. Re:Payroll by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1

    Yes, that's probably it. It's far more likely he simply doesn't know what the phrase is. Like those people who think it's 'for all intensive purposes' and not 'for all intents and purposes'. The English language is so totally screwed now, with this generation. Ugh. If we ever figure out how to TEACH them anything, let alone their KIDS, I really think an 'Idioms and Common Phrases' curriculum should be added starting in junior high. (Because the last thing we need is for the kids to start improperly using phrases and idioms their PARENTS don't understand while they're still in grade school.)

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  81. Re:Payroll by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
    think about all the thousands of people who will now learn about Halo3 who would normally have been ignorant of the game.

    So how many people in Borneo know of Jack Thompson?

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  82. Re:Payroll by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1

    I think you're giving waaaay too much credit to someone who was writing something that goddamn stupid. :P

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  83. Re:Payroll by R2.0 · · Score: 1

    "He minus well get paid by Take two and Microsoft."

    That one's right up there with "walla".

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  84. Re:Payroll by Sj0 · · Score: 1

    You know, it wouldn't be cooked up in a backyard shed with fuck knows what mixed in for effect if it was legal and regulated by the FDA.

    There also wouldn't be massive gangs who finance themselves soley by creating, transporting, and distributing these drugs.

    --
    It's been a long time.
  85. sharp shooting halo fan lol by luther349 · · Score: 0

    you cant learn how to handel a sniper rifle in a fps there video games. its just not possable. anyone that has handeld a real firearm knoes this. jackass and his little daly rants are so full of crap its sad. everyone is tought from a very young age anything on tv is fake and not real. and if they cant tell that at a older age they have far worse issues that need to be salved. and anyone that agrees with jack is well simply a dumbass or to lazy to teach there kids anything. hears a idea take gaming console go to jacks house and beat him over the head with it. there now he has a case for voliance by a video game. not this made up bs he thinks up. yes thers been cases where people tryed to use this shit as a defence but relly it was more a simpthy attempt then anything else or they turned out to relly be crazy.

  86. Re:Payroll by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 1

    How dare you! My mother was a saint!

    --
    Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
  87. Re:Payroll by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 1

    Coz he is a prophet - so money and other peoples' time are not of concern.

    --
    Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
  88. Sshhhhh by Zeussy · · Score: 1

    If he was not crazy, and used logical (sounding) conclusions and appealed to reasonable or religious sensibilities he would be MUCH more dangerous to free speech than he is. Your giving him idea's. Think of the children! They will have no video games, be reduced to playing outside on swings or even slides! They could get hurt!
  89. jack thompson, marketing genius by sl0ppy · · Score: 1

    it seems that when a new somewhat violent game comes out, jack thompson attempts legal recourse that is usually bound to fail and the game gets a whole lot more publicity.

    did jack find his calling? a few bucks sent his way, best marketing money can buy.

  90. obligatory by Ari+Rahikkala · · Score: 0, Redundant

    In Soviet Russia, Halo 3 declares Jack Thompson a public nuisance! ... I want to live in Soviet Russia :(

    1. Re:obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're in America, you're not far from Stalinist Russia now!

  91. Re:Payroll by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 1

    it doesn't even compare to commercial drugs.

    You are quite right. From: Drug War Facts

    Deaths per year in the U.S. attributable to:

    Cigarettes ~ 430,000
    Alcohol ~ 80,000
    Prescription Drugs ~ 30,000
    All illicit Drugs ~ 17,000

    Yes indeed, illicit drugs have a lot of catching up to do.

  92. Interview with dear Jack by renegadesx · · Score: 1

    renegadesx: So Jack, who is going to win the 2008 US election?
    Jack: Violent videogames

    renegadesx: ummm ok, so who do you think is going to win the 08 AU election?
    Jack: Violent videogames

    renegadesx: So Jack, when do you think its a good time to bring the troops out of Iraq?
    Jack: Violent videogames

    --
    Make SELinux enforcing again!
    1. Re:Interview with dear Jack by H0D_G · · Score: 1

      AU election is this year.

      --
      Kids! Bringing about Armageddon can be dangerous. Do not attempt it in your home!
  93. Re:Payroll by Disseminated · · Score: 5, Funny

    For all intensive purposes your wright. Its to bad I don't have no mod point's but if I did I would of. Irregardless, you'r point is much more affective then the usual drivel around hear.

  94. Poor Jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly I wonder if he finally does get disbarred what his mind will do, its already somewhere beyond sanity. He feels himself to be commanded by god to right the wrongs in this world (if thats an act simply for publicity, it certainly isn't helping him) when he finally gets disbarred, which is pretty much inevitable at this point, is he going to take his fight to what would be the next level? People who feel slighted at every turn and feel they have no other recourse tend to find themselves doing some pretty stupid things.

  95. Re:Payroll by Puff+of+Logic · · Score: 1

    For all intensive purposes your wright. Its to bad I don't have no mod point's but if I did I would of. Irregardless, you'r point is much more affective then the usual drivel around hear. My God, your post made me want to claw my eyes out. Thanks for that!
    --
    P.P.S. I'm doing Science and I'm still alive.
  96. Video games do have an effect on people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Video games do have a noticeable effect on people -- it makes them inactive and overweight.

    (And if you think the Wiimote is good exercise, it just means you're already inactive and overweight.)

  97. In the case of Halo, I wish Jack good luck by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    This game needs a good beat down to drop it down a peg or two, back to reality.

    Go ahead, flame, agree, moderate how you like - that's my thoughts on the series (no denying Jack is a cockhat of course) but really this Halo hype kills me, it's a good game at best (the first one) yet it's lauded as the second coming of jebus.

    1. Re:In the case of Halo, I wish Jack good luck by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      This game needs a good beat down to drop it down a peg or two, back to reality.

      Go ahead, flame, agree, moderate how you like - that's my thoughts on the series (no denying Jack is a cockhat of course) but really this Halo hype kills me, it's a good game at best (the first one) yet it's lauded as the second coming of jebus. Amen. I laughed my ass off when the local news channel did a spot on all the shmucks lined up for 3 days to get a copy. I swear they must have been on MS' payroll, the way they were talking about the "technological advancement" and "modern marvel" and similar shit. For chrissakes, it's YAFPS that happens to be prettier than the last one. And you can play it online and be called a "cockfag" every 14.1 seconds by some 12-year-old proto-human.

      It's a fucking game, people.
  98. It's difficult... by Kratisto · · Score: 0

    What do I have more contempt for? Halo, or Jack Thompson? ... Jack Thompson, clearly. "Halo 3 should be banned from stores, as it encourages violence against alien species and super-human bionically enhanced warriors"

    --
    Conscience is the inner voice which warns us that someone may be looking.
  99. Why? by Tmack · · Score: 1
    Its just more free publicity for MS.....

    tm

    --
    Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
    1. Re:Why? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      If you've ever defended yourself against a frivolous lawsuit, you'd know this sort of publicity is anything but "free". Right now, Jack Thompson has cost MS a non-trivial amount of money, because you can bet MS is already putting lawyers to work on this in preparation. Those lawyers' time is worth real money.

      I'm not trying to gin up sympathy for MS or anything, I just want to dispel this ridiculous notion that getting legally harassed is "free publicity" by any stretch of the imagination.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    2. Re:Why? by Tmack · · Score: 1

      If you've ever defended yourself against a frivolous lawsuit, you'd know this sort of publicity is anything but "free". Right now, Jack Thompson has cost MS a non-trivial amount of money, because you can bet MS is already putting lawyers to work on this in preparation. Those lawyers' time is worth real money.

      I'm not trying to gin up sympathy for MS or anything, I just want to dispel this ridiculous notion that getting legally harassed is "free publicity" by any stretch of the imagination.

      True, but its probably not as much as you think. MS, being as large and lawsuit lightning-rod-ish as they are probably have a slew of high priced lawyers on staff already. One more frivolous lawsuit probably wont cost them much more than they already pay their sharks every day.

      Tm

      --
      Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
  100. Better question... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

    Who is paying this guy?

  101. This just in by renegadesx · · Score: 1

    Crazy Jack as filed aanother lawsuit. Against NesCafe

    News at 11

    --
    Make SELinux enforcing again!
  102. Jack Thompson by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    What a lying jackass. A dishonest scumbag who will stop at nothing to ruin everyone's fun.

    Jack, gaming is a multi-billion dollar industry. Taking on Microsoft is a sure way to lose quickly.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  103. Re:Payroll by Nar+Matteru · · Score: 1

    Poor guy. Typo'd in a rush to get first comment and now his whole conspiracy theory is forgotten because of it. Although, Rockstar did do something similar, back when they were actually a small company... they hired this guy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Clifford/ To purposefully draw attention to GTA 2 by making it seem more controversial than it already was.

  104. pity this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please, pass a hat around to collect money that someone can buy him a 5$ hooker from so that he finally get laid.

  105. Ah yes... by l0b0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Good thing this guy keeps reminding me which games to buy. He's not paid by the game developers? Shucks.

  106. Re:Payroll by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    I could care less about your comment, infact I bet his comment was done for cheap!

    Anyways, back to playing with my legos.

  107. This is sarcasm, right? by LKM · · Score: 1

    This is sarcasm, right?

    The illegal drugs are only cooked up in backyard sheds because they are illegal. Not to mention that the dope I used to grow on my balcony was also an illegal drug, even though it has nothing "mixed in for effect" and probably does a lot less damage to my brain than the legal pills I eat when I have a headache.

  108. A Commendable Ploy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure it's already apparently obvious... But Jack doesn't give a stuff about violence or other questionable content in games. He probably plays the very games he's against in his underpants on the weekend.

    No... Jack ol' boy has realised that this is his road to infamy. It doesn't really matter how you get famous, as long as you get famous. Then, in backwards western countries like the US, the money will start rolling in. He's the Paris Hilton of the lawyer world... Only he doesn't have a sex-tape... Yet.

    Posting his exploits on teh intarweb only furthers his objective.

  109. Jack don't know jack by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

    I agree... Jack Ass Thompson is just doing this because he wants attention. He has no chance of winning... its like Goliath (Microsoft and Bungie) versus a cockroach (Thompson). He has to worry about his pending disbarment - why must he worry about Halo 3? Guess he has too much time on his hands and we all need a good laugh, I suppose. But for a good laugh - Have all Halo fans tar and feather him. Now THAT would be hilarious!

  110. Lets go WAAAAY Back. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In soviet america, Thompson Jacks YOU.

  111. Nuisance? by sqldr · · Score: 1

    Talk about hypocrisy.

    Jack, if you're reading this, please fuck off. You're becoming a "nuisance".

    --
    I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
  112. Not filed in Miami-Dade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's interesting to note that at the time of writing this post, the aforementioned lawsuit has not been filed in the Miami-Dade court system.
    So either JT is just sending this nonsense out as a press release and we're all falling for it, the Miami-Dade court system is a little backed up, or, well, I can't think of #3.
    In all probability, the suit has not been filed in the court system and this is a clever ruse by JT.
    Here's the link to check - feel free.

    http://www.miami-dadeclerk.com/civil/default.asp

  113. Re:Payroll by sYkSh0n3 · · Score: 1

    Since everybody is freakin' out about "minus", i might as well ask. isn't it "Dog eat dog" not "doggy dog"?

  114. Re:Payroll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll be using mcsteak in daily conversation from now on. As soon as I stop laughing.

  115. the real public nuisance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't someone declare Jack Thompson a nuisance to the public?

  116. Turnabout is fair play by Zed+is+not+Zee · · Score: 1
    It seems to me that there are excellent grounds for having Mr. Thompson declared a public nuisance himself. From the article, a public nuisance is something that

    tend[s] to annoy the community, injure the health of the citizens in general, or corrupt the public morals Surely filing frivolous lawsuits tends to corrupt the public morals by encouraging others to file frivolous lawsuits, and injures the health of the citizens by consuming limited legal resources which could better be used to deal with violent crime.
  117. Has it Occurred to Anyone that... by Hercules+Peanut · · Score: 1

    ...perhaps Jack Thompson is a tool to hype up a game. I wouldn't put it past any of the current crop of publishers to do this. I remember the heavy metal bands of the 80s and their supposed affiliation with satan drumming up publicity..

    and yes, I did just indirectly compare Jack Thompson to satan.

  118. Re:Payroll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, unless you're talking about Snoop.

  119. Re:Payroll by __aajfby9338 · · Score: 1

    Could of been worse. It made my head asplode.

  120. I'm lost at the purpose of this comment by patio11 · · Score: 1

    So we're trying to a) vindicate Jack Thompson's delusions that there are actually people who want him dead and, simultaneously, at least five Slashdotters with a modicrum of intelligence and karma to spare modded this up. Come on folks, wise the heck up -- when the Orlando News Sentinel prints "In response to Jackson's filing of the lawsuit, an anonymous member of the technology website Slashdot said, regarding methods of stopping Thompson, 'A single bullet ought to do the trick nicely'", it will NOT be Jack Thompson who looks like the crazy wacko.