Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot's Disagree Mail

I am responsible for reading most of the help requests sent to Slashdot. Most of the mail I get in a day is what you would expect, comments and concerns about postings, user accounts and Slashdot itself. There are a very special group however that get passed around the office due to the inordinate level of anger, lack of understanding and just plain weirdness they possess. Through the years I've collected many and still get such gems on a regular basis. We thought it would be fun to share some of our favorite rants, ramblings and ruminations with the rest of you. I give to you the first of many installments of Slashdot's disagree mail. The names have been changed to protect the idiot — hit the link below to drink it in.

Our first entry starts off by explaining:

"Every time I try to login it tells me that my password is bad! I know I'm using the right password why won't you let me in? My account is *******"

I'm sorry but I don't see an account with the name *******. I also don't find an account with the email address you're using associated with it. Do you happen to know what your uid is?

"Try lookin harder cause I was using AOL a few days ago just fine but now I can't! I'm mailing you from the library right now cause you won't let me on the internet!"

AOL? Can you not log into Slashdot or is the problem that you can't get online at home?

"Whats Slashdot why am I given you guys money for internet if I cant use it?!"

Slashdot is the website you are writing to. If you were banned here for some reason I might be able to help you but I'm not in charge of the whole internet, at least not yet. It sounds like you need to get a hold of AOL tech support and hopefully they can solve your problem.

"If you can't help me why are you on google when I type in help with the internet? If you don't want to help people when they need it maybe you shouldn't be on google!"

Our last email this week demonstrates something, but I'm not exactly sure what it is:

from ***************
to banned@slashdot.org
date Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 6:46 PM
subject stop sending me mail
"If your so fucking smart that you created the great and awesome slashdot why can't you figure out that I don't want your stupid bulshit mail! Everyone here acts like they are so much smarter than everyone else and that a teenager can't know what is right because he isn't fat enough from sitting around eating twinkys and playing games on the computer. You never even had a girlfriend I bet because you're to busy being smarter than everyone else. Fuck you stop sending mail just because you can't handle me!

P.S. Sorry I didn't write that my little brother did but I really don't want to get mail from you anymore can you help me please?"

361 of 489 comments (clear)

  1. It is most munificent of you, by seanadams.com · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... good sir, to expend your precious electro-bits so as to share those TWO WHOLE EMAILS with your loyal readers. I look forward to future installments of these tomes.

    Now, wtf do you expect us to discuss?

    1. Re:It is most munificent of you, by timster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe we can discuss how obnoxious the white-on-green text is? Please?

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    2. Re:It is most munificent of you, by aceofspades1217 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Stupidity in the /. community :P

      There sure is an abundance of it!

      So as they say in soviet russia... /discuss

    3. Re:It is most munificent of you, by nharmon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Send complaint to: banned@slashdot.org

    4. Re:It is most munificent of you, by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now, wtf do you expect us to discuss?

      How about the unholy heinousness that is idle's design? It looks like hammered shit. No, I take that back. It makes hammered shit look good.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    5. Re:It is most munificent of you, by reikoshea · · Score: 1

      All I can say is, werd. That was a little anti-climactic.

    6. Re:It is most munificent of you, by aceofspades1217 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I am going to have to agree with you. Really bad web design etiquette if you ask me. I mean I have always loved slashdot because they do a great job having a really clean website.

    7. Re:It is most munificent of you, by An+anonymous+Frank · · Score: 1

      Or how new "sections" should let you quickly mark them as not-something-you-want-on-the-cover-page for the first week of its inception into the "officially released" realm.

    8. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      As opposed to green-on-black?

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    9. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Looks like I'm not the only one who used to hammer shit as a kid.

    10. Re:It is most munificent of you, by bugnuts · · Score: 1

      Now, wtf do you expect us to discuss?

      Maybe the fact that the reply box is about 2" x 2" (at least on my terse setup). At least all the replies will be short.

      This looks more like a therapy session for the complaint department run by a luddite who gets a total of 6 emails a day.

    11. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 4, Funny

      Make sure it is a good rant.

      By the way, thanks for making the comment box about 2 inches by 2 inches large. I guess it is a form of text compression.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    12. Re:It is most munificent of you, by statemachine · · Score: 1

      I spent more time looking for the other e-mails and scanning the comments for what might have happened than actually reading the e-mails.

      It's like an important test that was so easy, you spend time making sure it wasn't filled with trick questions.

    13. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Animaether · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well seeing as there really isn't anything to discuss here ( unless they expected other website owners, sysadmins, etc. to write in with their user experiences)....

      Maybe I would like Backslash... back.

      Rehashing popular topics, picking some of the top comments, etc. is a vastly more interesting thing to do than reaching into the hatemail grab-bag.

      For the curious:
      http://backslash.slashdot.org/

      For the curious as to why it's seemingly-dead:
      http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=588277&cid=23846333
      ( summary: Tim got too busy )

    14. Re:It is most munificent of you, by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Now, wtf do you expect us to discuss?

      How you can't read the last line of the post in IE6, and why they can't use the same CSS that almost works in the rest of the site ;)? Or maybe how I had to put a <p> between quoting you and my firs line to keep the <br> from acting like a <p>?

      Fuck, even putting <p>& nbsp;<p> doesn't work.

      Oh, as to the topic, it looks to me like some kid thinks slashdot is AOL's tech support. Either that or sam HBT.

      Guys, the CSS on idle is an embarrassing mess, are you ever going to fix it?

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    15. Re:It is most munificent of you, by JeanCroix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...still the easiest on my eyes, after all these years.

    16. Re:It is most munificent of you, by PIBM · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, if you are using an iphone, 2 inches by 2 inches is like almost all of the screen estate ... so, why are you complaining ? ;)

    17. Re:It is most munificent of you, by harrkev · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe we can discuss how obnoxious the white-on-green text is? Please?

      Back in my day, we had green-on-black text. If you were really lucky, you had AMBER on black. Now, those were the days.

      Now where were we? Oh yeah--the important thing was that I had an onion on my belt, which was the style at the time.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    18. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Sir+Holo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's a lot easier on the eyes than a bright white field with black text. Don't try to print it out, though.

      Or how about yellow on blue?

    19. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Chibi · · Score: 1

      so as to share those TWO WHOLE EMAILS

      When I read the summary, I had the impression that the first was an e-mail exchange. Looking at the number of replies, I'm guessing 7 e-mails. Not very exciting, but that's why it's "Idle." :)

      --
      If all you have are silver bullets, everything looks like a werewolf.
    20. Re:It is most munificent of you, by qoncept · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's not green, buddy. It's teal. Which is incredibly annoying regardless of any other factors.

      --
      Whale
    21. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      Was your previous account name *******?

    22. Re:It is most munificent of you, by clone53421 · · Score: 5, Informative

      javascript:for(var a=document.getElementsByTagName("textarea"),i=0;i<a.length;i++){a[i].style.width="100%";a[i].style.height="300px";}void(0);

      There ya go.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    23. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 3, Informative

      I love you now, sir.

      --
      I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
    24. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Yellow on blue was good enough for NC, and it was good enough for me.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    25. Re:It is most munificent of you, by teko_teko · · Score: 1

      The white-on-green itself is fine, but when you scroll down to read the comments... AH! Holy contrast ratio, Batman!

      Took a while for my eyes to adjust the to white background again...

    26. Re:It is most munificent of you, by jdray · · Score: 1

      Shoulda called it "Disagremail."

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    27. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Atticka · · Score: 2, Informative

      Agreed! the transition from white on green to black on white just made me blind!

      --
      No sig here...
    28. Re:It is most munificent of you, by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      If you were really lucky, you had AMBER on black

      I'll see your amber-on-black, and raise you with 132 columns and smooth scrolling.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    29. Re:It is most munificent of you, by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 5, Informative

      *cough* @namespace url(http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml);

      @-moz-document domain(slashdot.org) {
      .inline_comment .generalbody {
      padding-right: 30px !important;
      }
      .inline_comment .generalbody textarea {
      width: 100% !important;
      }
      }
      *cough*

      Whew, gotta do something about that cough. You know it's getting bad when you cough up Stylish sheets.

      I should probably write another one to fix the lack of proper line spacing in the preview when using <p>s...

    30. Re:It is most munificent of you, by lgw · · Score: 1

      Sorry I didn't write that my little brother did ... can you help me please?"

      There's is a new meme if I ever saw one!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    31. Re:It is most munificent of you, by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Was your previous account name *******?

      Nope, but a funny story. I got my first computer when I was 12. Naturally, I wanted to look at the BBS's. So for my account name I wanted to use **** **** since that was the same number of characters as my name and I thought it would look cool. The software wouldn't allow it. Took me about a year to figure that one out. :)

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    32. Re:It is most munificent of you, by JustOK · · Score: 5, Funny

      You should see someone about that

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    33. Re:It is most munificent of you, by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      Back in my day, we had green-on-black text. If you were really lucky, you had AMBER on black. Now, those were the days

      And that IBM XT booted uphill, both ways? Oh, that sucker was a speed demon, with its whopping 4MHz processor and 640KB of RAM! Why! That was enough for anything!

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    34. Re:It is most munificent of you, by SuperQ · · Score: 1

      I really miss my AT&T Business Terminal. It even had simple macro programming to store a few key sequences. Good for AT commands and TW2002 shortcuts.

    35. Re:It is most munificent of you, by againjj · · Score: 3, Informative

      When replaying click options, under Comment Box Size, set Rows and Columns to what you want, click save, and the next time you make a comment, it is a better size!

      Though why it doesn't resize the box currently open, I have no idea. Seems dumb to me.

    36. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Jerf · · Score: 1

      Or how that floaty thing on top breaks Page Down and Space (=Page Down)? (The one on the main site is much better since it doesn't do that.)

    37. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Firehed · · Score: 4, Informative

      Or just use Safari and resize on the fly :p

      (I hate Safari but had to throw it out there)

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    38. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 3, Funny

      I had an onion on my belt, which was the style at the time.

      You misspelled slide rule, but point taken.

    39. Re:It is most munificent of you, by rvw14 · · Score: 2, Funny

      My XT Clone had a turbo button on it! Boy did Wordperfect fly with the turbo on.

    40. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Facetious · · Score: 1

      You're not his friend, pal.

      --
      Let us not become the evil that we deplore.
    41. Re:It is most munificent of you, by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      There is a word I can think of that should, if spoken correctly, send shivers down your spine.

      That word is ...

      WYSE.

      (They make pretty decent linux-based thin clients nowadays, though)

    42. Re:It is most munificent of you, by chromacat · · Score: 1

      He's not your mate, guy!

    43. Re:It is most munificent of you, by AmyRose1024 · · Score: 1

      What's annoying about it? I happen to like it!

    44. Re:It is most munificent of you, by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      I actually really do feel OLD when people talk about XTs as if they're some kind of ancient history before anyone's reasonable memory... I remember the XT coming out, and already had a personal computer at the time - with MUCH less than 640KB of RAM and MUCH slower than 4MHz.

      *sigh*

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    45. Re:It is most munificent of you, by fhage · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Back in my Vaxen days some users used to program their VT200 terminals so they could login with one key press. Ahh, those were the good 'ol days. Now people don't even know what the "break" key is for. Noobs. :-)

    46. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Namors · · Score: 2, Funny

      He's not a guy, oh wait this is /.

      --
      Dual Century Programming: Yeah I know ... But it sounds Good
    47. Re:It is most munificent of you, by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      We didn't have computers when I was 12. OK, the bank did, and so did NORAD, but that was about it. The only BBS I had access to were the ones that went in my air rifle.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    48. Re:It is most munificent of you, by LoadWB · · Score: 1

      His name isn't guy, pal!

    49. Re:It is most munificent of you, by crossconnects · · Score: 1

      I remember the XT, it didn't have 640KB at first, but it could be upgraded to that.

      i remember the 10MB disk drive and the 360K floppy.

      I had an even older Tandy Color Computer, that used a tape deck for storage, and advertised 16K of RAM.

      --
      no big sig
    50. Re:It is most munificent of you, by sjs132 · · Score: 1

      Actually, back in my day, we had black on green, and the little blinking square after the "OK" prompt.

      Of course, if you wanted lowercase, you'd have black blocks with green uppercase letters inside for the inverse video representation of the lowercase letters.

      It is amazing how days differ and nights fade into obscurity...

      --
      --- Relax, that mass muderer is just trying to reduce our carbon footprint, one fetus at a time...
    51. Re:It is most munificent of you, by seededfury · · Score: 3, Funny

      are you one of those guys writing these emails to slashdot?

    52. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Pharmboy · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I had an onion on my belt, which was the style at the time.

      You misspelled slide rule, but point taken.

      No, you missed the point. It was a Simpsons reference.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    53. Re:It is most munificent of you, by em0te · · Score: 1

      Slashdot should start making Skins that people can use!!!
      I mean seriously, it's pretty stupid design layout. I don't know what I pay you for! If you can't make all my webpages look the same than you should make yours look like everyone elses.
      Ican't get on AOL any more either!! ever sense you opened idle.slashdot up i can't get online!!.

      Sorry, my little brother wrote that. Really though, could you make a skin that displays green on black that also runs slower than the actual site? Plus I decided to leave my little brothers comment in my comment cause my delete key is broken.

    54. Re:It is most munificent of you, by madcat2c · · Score: 1

      this

    55. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Back in my day, we had green-on-black text. If you were really lucky, you had AMBER on black. Now, those were the days.

      You forgot the reference about "you young kids and your fancy ANSI graphics and 16 colors".

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    56. Re:It is most munificent of you, by hurfy · · Score: 1

      lol, yup we had a 3MHz? machine with 512MB ram that 7 people could log in to...provided you turned up the air conditioning first ;) I still have the Hard Drive, it still weighs more than me.

      I have a user that wanted the green on black for our current accounting program when i showed the vintage look.

      I think 2 whole emails/conversations/ whatever was kinda thin also.

    57. Re:It is most munificent of you, by wpanderson · · Score: 1

      You forgot All Your Base.

      --
      neuro at well dot com (when I post, it's my opinions, no-one elses)
    58. Re:It is most munificent of you, by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Wow.
      I had beige on metallic
      white - a Texas
      Silentype terminal.
      It had analogue
      scrolling, so I guess
      you could call it
      smooth.

      As for 132 columns,
      that's far more than we
      get here on /.

    59. Re:It is most munificent of you, by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      My first puter (a VIC-20) gave me rainbow on black. On the TV it was pretty much unreadable. Since I knew what I was typing, I could always figure it out. Of course, since I couldn't program worth a crap back then, I never could read what the puter typed back.

      Now, typing this with random graffitti all over the input box, that's more like it. Who said /. should be easy?

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    60. Re:It is most munificent of you, by hurfy · · Score: 1

      lol, the other window open on my machine right now is a terminal emulator set for WYSE60 to run our stupid accounting system. I would rather have the real thing but all the vendor purchasing info,etc not to mention email is on websites or windows (or both :/) so people still need a real computer.

      The training class we took in 2004 for it was on the real deal tho...

      Only takes a 2.5GHz HT
      windows box to emulate...um nothing?!?

      Isn't progress grand?

    61. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Why is it that every time I hear the words "negative space" I just thick "fucking prick" and stop listening?

    62. Re:It is most munificent of you, by KillerBob · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In computer terms, *Windows 95* is some kind of ancient history... An XT is the bronze age, and earlier stuff like the DEC PDP is the stone age. Charles Babbage's Difference Engine is early single-celled organisms floating in pond scum.

      But I was referring the comment about "amber screen if you were lucky"... I still remember playing Police Quest 1 on an amber-scale hercules monochrome, having to use the siren to go through traffic lights because you couldn't tell whether they were red or green. And that was on an XT. :)

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    63. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Burma Shave

    64. Re:It is most munificent of you, by digitig · · Score: 2, Informative

      Green on black? We submitted Hollerith cards, and got back output from a golfball printer that was so misaligned that you couldn't easily read along a line even with the green lines preprinted on the paper to help you!

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    65. Re:It is most munificent of you, by RobFlynn · · Score: 1

      Ah, brings back memories. I remember my 10MB drive as well. When I finally filled it up, I got a 20MB drive and thought "Wow, I'll NEVER fill THIS up!"

      --

      ---
      Rob Flynn
      Pidgin
    66. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Brett+Buck · · Score: 5, Funny

      When was that, nineteen dickety two?

    67. Re:It is most munificent of you, by bonehead · · Score: 1

      I remember those as well. I believe I paid around $600 for my first 500 MB hard drive, and at the time it was a steal.

      Also when upgrading your memory meant buying an expansion card, buying the memory chips separately, and having to plug them all into the card when you got home.

      Then there was used computer shop down the street where I always bought my SIMS, because they were "only" $50 per meg. At those prices, the amount of memory in my girlfriend's iPhone would be worth enough to pay cash for EIGHT houses in my neighborhood.

    68. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Mistshadow2k4 · · Score: 1

      You also forgot does it run linux, Natalie Portman, our overlords and Cowboy Neal. Do I spend too much time on /.? I'm beginning to think so.

      --
      I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
    69. Re:It is most munificent of you, by itsybitsy · · Score: 1

      Ok, not only is the green background messed up but the comment box is way too tiny for any sorta intelligent rant back at you for your green background! Get your css or html or brain fixed!

    70. Re:It is most munificent of you, by actionbastard · · Score: 1

      I find your opinion intriguing and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

      --
      Sig this!
    71. Re:It is most munificent of you, by colourmyeyes · · Score: 1

      lol, yup we had a 3MHz? machine with 512MB ram

      Usually the problem is too little ram for the processor speed - this sure turns that on its head.

      --
      My grandmother used anecdotal evidence all the time, and she lived to be 120 years old.
    72. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my first computer had 256 bytes of CPU addressable memory, and 16K of VRAM. (The TI-99/4A.) Before that I learned to program the Commodore VIC-20 with a whopping 5K bytes of RAM.

      (Ok, by then I had also programmed Commodore PETs (mostly 4032s), along with the Commodore 64 and a CoCo 2. But I wasn't very good at it. I was only 8. But BASIC is pretty easy to pick up. Imagine the fun when I discovered The Peanut (the PCjr).)

    73. Re:It is most munificent of you, by isorox · · Score: 1

      Back in my day, we had green-on-black text.

      In *your* day? I run fluxbox, and launch almost everything from rxvt: .fluxbox/keys:Mod1 66 :ExecCommand rxvt -bg black -fg green -sl 10000

      Much easier on the eyes

    74. Re:It is most munificent of you, by megaditto · · Score: 5, Funny

      I pasted this into my address bar, thinking "why the hell not"

      The fact that it actually worked is just plain scary...
      What's next? Address bar pong?

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    75. Re:It is most munificent of you, by megaditto · · Score: 1

      To pause qbasic apps?

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    76. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And the memory in my computers here would buy the whole town. Or even a sizable amount of SCO stock!

      Uh... ok, nevermind.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    77. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1973248&group_id=4421&atid=104421

      ^- posted ages ago. Maybe Slashdot should lay off laughing at emails and actually look at their bug tracker more than once a year.

    78. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      But at least you had that rifle! Our kids will be glad if they still get water guns because of safety, thinkofthechildren concerns.

      But only 'til some dimwit fills it with paint and hits another kid's eye. Then, finally, the parents will be right. All's fun and game 'til someone loses an eye.

      And then even water pistols are a thing of the past.

      I just hope we may still play with our bubblewrap.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    79. Re:It is most munificent of you, by xenn · · Score: 1

      Oh, so THIS is the internet. I'd only ever heard about it before now.

      Seriously, if anyone get's hairy palms over this... That's just plain disturbing.

    80. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Could be worse. In Soviet Russia, /. spends time on YOU!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    81. Re:It is most munificent of you, by vladsinger · · Score: 1

      My school uses the current ones.

    82. Re:It is most munificent of you, by ormico · · Score: 1

      That is freaky. I had no idea you could paste javascript into your address bar and it would run.

    83. Re:It is most munificent of you, by shanen · · Score: 1

      I'm complaining because I'm disappointed that I didn't make the cut. I've sent them at least a couple of juicy complaints over the years.

      However, the "idle" style sheet does reek like the proverbial big dog's m0e.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    84. Re:It is most munificent of you, by StormShaman · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean celery on your shirt?

    85. Re:It is most munificent of you, by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

      Here's one for you. Like 70% of people use IE7 (maybe less here) and I have an 8600GTS and 4400+ X2 and it lags severely scrolling up and down. This is up there with the most poorly designed, poorly coded pages on the internet. The colors should be fixed AFTER they make it...you know...displayable.

      --
      Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    86. Re:It is most munificent of you, by flewp · · Score: 1

      But were you down with OPP?

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    87. Re:It is most munificent of you, by RTump · · Score: 1

      Hammered shit, a new favourite, up there on the top shelf with "...a can of smashed assholes".

    88. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Digicrat · · Score: 1

      Yep, that's old news. I used to have a nice little javascript command bookmarked in IE (a long, long time ago in a galaxy without Firefox) that I could use to abruptly stop those never-ending pop-up chains without killing all of IE/Windows.

      In the Firefox universe, the FireBug plugin lets you run javascript on the fly, not to mention alter stylesheets and HTML code of the page as your viewing (useful for designing/testing).

    89. Re:It is most munificent of you, by BigChiefMunkey · · Score: 1

      Damn that Kaiser!

    90. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If you were really lucky, you had AMBER on black.

      Who is this Amber you speak of, and where can I get her phone number?

    91. Re:It is most munificent of you, by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Oh god, here we go again with one of these lame "Back in da day" threads again.

    92. Re:It is most munificent of you, by cailith1970 · · Score: 1

      I still have the Hard Drive, it still weighs more than me.

      Yeah, all that data you could get on them old drives made 'em REAL heavy! :)

      --
      I intend to live forever, or die trying. - Groucho Marx
    93. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      I fill my ink cartridges with liquid paper and print on green card, you insensitive clod!

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    94. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Miseph · · Score: 1

      No, I'm writing to Google. By the way, why aren't youhelping me get on the internet?!?!?!?! AOL was working fine for me last week, why aren't you helping me?!

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    95. Re:It is most munificent of you, by mortonda · · Score: 1

      If you were really lucky, you had AMBER on black. Now, those were the days.

      Ooohhh, the amber screens. Those were awesome! Obviously a better computer. (Despite the fact that both terminals went to the same VAX)

    96. Re:It is most munificent of you, by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

      shut up, firefox can't display correct or interact with advanced features on half the websites I use. It's useless.

      --
      Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    97. Re:It is most munificent of you, by ystar · · Score: 1

      Sure we can: it's not obnoxious at all! (...well, it doesn't bother me at least)

      I really do like Idle's layout but joking aside, I definitely agree that /. ought to allow for some background color changing via css menus or user prefs. People spend so much time here, it's sensible to allow for some changeable color schemes just as one could do to his or her own room (without going the way of hokey 'tropical theme' skins). /. really isn't the place for the "one true way" mindset.

    98. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I dunno, but so far 365 comments are here to talk about nothing much.

      Er, make that 366.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    99. Re:It is most munificent of you, by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Yup... and it has the same privileges as any other script on the page. It can interact with pretty much anything else on the page... pretty handy sometimes...

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    100. Re:It is most munificent of you, by kandela · · Score: 1

      I like the white on green. Just cause you're a geek doesn't mean you can't have an appreciation of aesthetics.

      --
      Conservation of angular momentum makes the world go round.
    101. Re:It is most munificent of you, by zhrinze · · Score: 1

      Amber? Lucky? That was a HORRIBLE color. The REAL green phosphor was a beautiful emerald green with soothing properties and so crisp. I cry every day, I miss it so much...

    102. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      so _that's_ where you got all those freckles!

    103. Re:It is most munificent of you, by aceofspades1217 · · Score: 1

      PS. Mom says its bedtime. Please go to sleep so we dont get beat again :(

      Sincerely,

      Dad

      lol the moment I read that I thought of bash.org.

    104. Re:It is most munificent of you, by jimmydevice · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the IBM 1130.

    105. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Omnedon · · Score: 1

      Back in my day, we had green-on-black text. If you were really lucky, you had AMBER on black. Now, those were the days.

      And for a P2P protocol we used sneakernet. We had to take floppy disks and WALK to the host. Through 6 feet of snow. Uphill. Both ways!

    106. Re:It is most munificent of you, by ockegheim · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wikipedia knows everything:

      As the teletype came into use, a key was created that would temporarily interrupt the communications line, allowing this practice to continue. When this occurred, the receiving teletype mechanism would activate but not print characters (it was typing the non-printing DEL character repeatedly). The noise got the operator's attention.

      I bet these noobs have never used a teletype either>

      --
      I’m old enough to remember 16K of memory being described as “whopping”
    107. Re:It is most munificent of you, by LoztInSpace · · Score: 1



      Try this:

      javascript:R=0; x1=.1; y1=.05; x2=.25; y2=.24; x3=1.6; y3=.24; x4=300; y4=200; x5=300; y5=200; DI=document.getElementsByTagName("img"); DIL=DI.length; function A(){for(i=0; i-DIL; i++){DIS=DI[ i ].style; DIS.position='absolute'; DIS.left=(Math.sin(R*x1+i*x2+x3)*x4+x5)+'px'; DIS.top=(Math.cos(R*y1+i*y2+y3)*y4+y5)+'px'}R++}setInterval('A()',50); void(0);

      Lifted from some site I can't remember now.

    108. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Dewin+Cymraeg · · Score: 1

      Design etiquette? Not sure what that means! Maybe he farted while deicding the the exact shade of green to use for the background. I like the colours. It's nice to have a dark background once in a while - it's more soothing on my eyes. When I have a display that isn't back-lit, I may agree with you!

    109. Re:It is most munificent of you, by aceofspades1217 · · Score: 1

      Its kind of growing on me though. I guess my eyes needed to get used to it. But now it is feeling like it is a little easier to read because it stands out so much and maybe it kind of does suit the "relaxed" feel of the idle section.

    110. Re:It is most munificent of you, by WillKemp · · Score: 1

      A hard disk? Wow! That really is modern. One of the first two computers i programmed for had a drum and the other one had no storage at all - just a punched card reader.

    111. Re:It is most munificent of you, by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you shouldn't have to use a fucking Firefox plugin to fix a website's look and feel.

      Hey, why don't all sites just go back to how they were in 1990! We should all use Stylish to apply our own styles!

    112. Re:It is most munificent of you, by digitig · · Score: 1

      ICL 1904s actually. I'm not that old!

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    113. Re:It is most munificent of you, by BlackJedi · · Score: 1

      Yes, the Vic had 5K of RAM in total, but only 3583 bytes of it were available in BASIC. It's incredible how we could get anything done in such tiny memory.

    114. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 1
      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    115. Re:It is most munificent of you, by iapetus · · Score: 1

      I managed to embed that code into a message on a certain .NET-based message board when the administrators refused to believe that they had it configured in a not-overly-secure way.

      It changed one or two minds. ;)

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    116. Re:It is most munificent of you, by iapetus · · Score: 1

      640K of RAM? We had to put up with 1K. Oh, how I envied the kids down the road who had the top-of-the-range model with 16K that could cope with displaying the screen and carrying out calculations at the same time...

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    117. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Drawsalot · · Score: 1

      On my 4200+ with 8800 GTS 340MB it's smooth as silk- no lag.

    118. Re:It is most munificent of you, by laederkeps · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? Well it turned me into a NEWT!

    119. Re:It is most munificent of you, by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      A kid could choke to death on bubblewrap, you know.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    120. Re:It is most munificent of you, by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      cause my delete key is broken.

      I hear reinstalling Windows fixes that.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    121. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Stooshie · · Score: 1

      ... By the way, thanks for making the comment box about 2 inches by 2 inches large ...

      I think you'll find that's the tagging beta input box. ;-)

      --
      America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
    122. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Single+GNU+Theory · · Score: 1

      I saw the same four square inch text box thing. I've always replied to comments by opening the reply page in a new tab (heck, I opened them in new browser windows before there were tabs, to avoid reloading a long page of comments, over a shared 56kbps modem, on a 100MHz machine where the time penalty to redraw a long page was severe). I saw some options on the reply page to change the area of the text box, but only the length changed.

      However, in a moment of desperation (did I mention it's a really old habit of mine to reply in a new window?) I left-clicked on the Reply to This lozenge button. Lo and behold! A properly-sized comment box opened up beneath your post.

      To be fair, the editors did say that they were going to experiment with the user interface in idle. Unfortunately, I can't seem to figure out how to make paragraphs anymore.

      --
      Little Debian: America's #1 Snack Distro!
    123. Re:It is most munificent of you, by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      md5this.com ? or maybe that script has just been making its rounds... I don't think that site has been updated in ages...

      Hint to anyone trying that: don't do it on /. -- do a google image search and run it from the search results page.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    124. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Single+GNU+Theory · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, I can't seem to figure out how to make paragraphs anymore.

      It seems paragraphs work fine except in the preview, heh.

      --
      Little Debian: America's #1 Snack Distro!
    125. Re:It is most munificent of you, by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Hey, why don't all sites just go back to how they were in 1990!

      There was no YouTube in 1990.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    126. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Stooshie · · Score: 1

      Luxury. We had 1 bit of memory with variable clock speed which could be hard-metal programmed.

      We called it the light switch!

      We managed to make a beowulf cluster of them though and built our own version of a BBC model B. Damn, 32k light switches took up a lot of room. And if you set the all the switched to 1, the room started melting.

      --
      America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
    127. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Stooshie · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm swedish you insensitive clod!

      --
      America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
    128. Re:It is most munificent of you, by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      smaller and more legible

      I disagree. Smaller, perhaps, but it's quite unclear to me what that code does (if it does what I suspect, it won't work in certain situations... more in a moment). My code is entirely self-explanatory, and if formatted nicely would be just as easy to read as yours.

      Does your JQuery change the CSS definition of the textarea? Or does it iterate through and change the custom CSS style of every textarea instance? E.g. would
        <textarea style="height:200px;width:200px;"></textarea>
      be re-formatted to comply with the 100%,300px size, or would the custom CSS height and width definitions override the new default CSS definition of the textarea?

      My loop will iteratively change the style of every textarea, overriding any CSS defaults and present custom CSS attributes... I suspect your code wouldn't re-format elements that have custom CSS height and width attributes.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    129. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Philip+Shaw · · Score: 1

      This happens because the size is defined by CSS, and so either the page would need to be refreshed or javascript could be used to redraw the box, as described in an earlier post. Resizing the box in the latter way is perfectly possible, but not really worth the effort, since this would onky occur occasionally for each user.

      --
      "A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject."- Winston Churchill
    130. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Scare,+code+monkey · · Score: 1

      something like a[i].style.height="10em"; would be better. I hate it when someone assumes that they know the pixel height of my font!

    131. Re:It is most munificent of you, by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Meh... it actually didn't even occur to me to try to make it "fit" the text box to a certain number of rows. 300 pixels doesn't give me an even fit anyway, it's just a number I thought was "big enough".

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    132. Re:It is most munificent of you, by Shambhu · · Score: 1

      The fact that it is not clear to you, in particular, what the code does is fairly unimportant.

      In fact, it is not as you guess - it will override existing inline styles.

      And finally, why would you bother building an argument on such an arbitrary supposition?

      --
      Rome wasn't bilked in a day.
    133. Re:It is most munificent of you, by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Ok, I checked up a bit on JQuery. That code isn't a very good example of it, I think... it's really not much clearer or shorter than the regular JavaScript. Although JQuery may have its benefits, it's hardly worth using a code library to perform such a short mundane hack... and JQuery wouldn't work anyway as a bookmarklet!

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    134. Re:It is most munificent of you, by LKM · · Score: 1

      There was no web in 1990 :-)

  2. I'm sorry, by pwnies · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I really am. Not for the hate letters you get... but for this as a whole. Idle just doesn't feel like frontpage material /.

    1. Re:I'm sorry, by lobo-tuerto · · Score: 1

      Slashdot's Disagree With U

    2. Re:I'm sorry, by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Except that this particular article was on the front page - that's where I saw it.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    3. Re:I'm sorry, by descil · · Score: 1

      How is slashdot not entirely about idle? The place should be called idle.com :/ yes com coz cmdrtaco is a fat bastard

  3. Horrible stylesheet by nharmon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm about to send an email complaining about the horrible stylesheet that idle.slashdot.org uses.

    1. Re:Horrible stylesheet by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

      Style sheet? I though Someone swallowed the blue and yellow Playdough and threw up on my monitor.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:Horrible stylesheet by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Lets be productive.

      Those guys manage to get banned right? What about a "3 strikes" solution

      (for abusers)

      Strike 1: You get idle stories mixed to slashdot front page.
      Strike 2: Slashdot front page becomes "idle colour" (Teal)
      Strike 3: Slashdot.org forwards you to idle.slashdot.org no matter what you do.

      Lets see if anyone dares to abuse slashdot from now on! ;)

  4. Dear Slashdot by Funkcikle · · Score: 1

    Why the hell do I keep getting these emails you get? The total is up to TWO now - it is unbearable. Please desist!

  5. Years worth of emails by Gr33nNight · · Score: 5, Funny

    And he posts two. Must be a tough job.

    1. Re:Years worth of emails by kraada · · Score: 5, Funny

      There are only 10 hilarious emails he's ever gotten.

      And he posted them both.

    2. Re:Years worth of emails by rolfwind · · Score: 5, Funny

      There are only 10 types of people in the world --
      those who understand binary, and those who get laid.

    3. Re:Years worth of emails by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      And, sadly, that was funnier than all of his e-mails. Although I suspect he may be receiving more shortly...

    4. Re:Years worth of emails by LordKazan · · Score: 4, Funny

      but.. how do you classify the people who fit in BOTH groups?

      LAID 1+0?

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    5. Re:Years worth of emails by binaryseraph · · Score: 1

      All other emails were not funny, but instead, rightfully angry emails about rejected articles.

    6. Re:Years worth of emails by Flaming+Babies · · Score: 5, Funny

      There are only 10 types of people in the world -- those who understand binary, and those who get laid.

      What about the other 8 types?

      --
      The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously.
    7. Re:Years worth of emails by bill_kress · · Score: 1

      And I'm guessing that since you only posted 2 types of people, you are in the former group.

      Whoops, I just put myself there too!

    8. Re:Years worth of emails by richardkelleher · · Score: 1

      Really. I was expecting at least 10 or 12. He really just has to scan through his sent items for all mail sent to the distribution list WTF!?. There must be hundreds of these things. Two is just barely enough to catch our attention.

    9. Re:Years worth of emails by JCSoRocks · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's would be 2 in hex...for the ubergeeks

      wtf?? Since when? That's decimal 2 in binary... not hex. 10 in hex would be the same as 16 in decimal. Maybe you need a little help. Remember, math is FUN.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    10. Re:Years worth of emails by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      There are only 10 types of people in the world -- those who understand binary, and those who get laid.

      Hey dipshit, you forgot to list the other five types.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    11. Re:Years worth of emails by blackmesa82 · · Score: 1

      There are only 10 hilarious emails he's ever gotten.

      And he posted them both.

      That's would be 2 in hex...for the ubergeeks.

      You mean "that would be two in binary."

      10 is sixteen in hex.

    12. Re:Years worth of emails by Saxerman · · Score: 5, Funny

      but.. how do you classify the people who fit in BOTH groups?

      There are two bits. Turn them both on. I.e, this one goes to 11.

      --

      A steaming cup of soykaf would be real wiz right now.

    13. Re:Years worth of emails by LoadWB · · Score: 1

      I think he meant $2, $02, 0x2, 0x02, or >0002. I'd like to give him the benefit of the doubt.

      While I'm not getting laid.

    14. Re:Years worth of emails by FauxReal · · Score: 1

      I befriended a cute computer programmer because I was one of the only people who knew the series of 1s and 0s she embroidered on her tote bag was a binary representation of "69".

    15. Re:Years worth of emails by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      That almost made spit fly out my nose! Good 1! P.S. Yeah, wtf with the dinky text area!!!

    16. Re:Years worth of emails by ChrisMP1 · · Score: 1

      Somehow I think that he
      meant that 10 in binary
      is equivalent to 2 in hex,
      i.e., 10 in binary = 0x02.

      Goddammit I hate this
      box.

      --
      <sig>&nbsp;</sig>
    17. Re:Years worth of emails by Agent__Smith · · Score: 1

      And he posts two. Must be a tough job.

      I guess he didn't want to overwhelm us on the first try...

      Looks like he has to deal with one of these e-mails about once every 7.5 years...

      --
      "It seems that we are at the age where life stops giving us things, and starts taking them away..." Indiana Jones
    18. Re:Years worth of emails by Flaming+Babies · · Score: 1

      Whoosh!!!

      Right back atcha...think about it.

      --
      The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously.
    19. Re:Years worth of emails by blair1q · · Score: 1

      how do you classify the people who fit in BOTH groups?

      As a lie group.

      i.e., if someone says they both understand binary and get laid, it's a lie.

    20. Re:Years worth of emails by duckInferno · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ohhh I get it.

      Yes... what about those other 8 types then?

      --
      Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
    21. Re:Years worth of emails by shrikel · · Score: 1
      I think you mis-parsed his sentence.

      10 in binary is 2 in decimal and is also 2 in hex.

      --
      Any sufficiently simple magic can be passed off as mere advanced technology.
    22. Re:Years worth of emails by Dean+Edmonds · · Score: 1

      I didn't used to understand binary, but now I understand it all too well.

      --

      -deane

    23. Re:Years worth of emails by treeves · · Score: 1

      That would be called "the empty set". OK, not really, but that's the expected value.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    24. Re:Years worth of emails by confusedneutrino · · Score: 1

      Win.

      --


      --RIAmAses! Let my MP3ople go!
    25. Re:Years worth of emails by deek · · Score: 3, Funny

      There are only 10 types of people in the world -- those who understand binary, and those who get laid.

      What are the other 14 types?

    26. Re:Years worth of emails by jkirby · · Score: 1

      He is too busy getting laid.

      --
      Jamey Kirby
    27. Re:Years worth of emails by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Remember, math is FUN.

      Yeah. So is swallowing thumbtacks!

    28. Re:Years worth of emails by blackmesa82 · · Score: 1

      Good point.

      Uber-geek indeed.

    29. Re:Years worth of emails by initialE · · Score: 1

      I hate to say this, but you belong to the group that doesn't get laid. But then again, so do I. :-(

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    30. Re:Years worth of emails by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      That's what she said!

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    31. Re:Years worth of emails by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 1

      You, sir, are obviously in the former category.

    32. Re:Years worth of emails by thelenm · · Score: 1

      "Hex" is just a fancy name for binary, just like "backslash" is just a fancy name for a slash.

      --
      Use Ctrl-C instead of ESC in Vim!
    33. Re:Years worth of emails by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

      There are only 10 types of people in the world,
      those who make binary jokes, and the other 9, but I won't go into those.

    34. Re:Years worth of emails by Mhtsos · · Score: 1

      No he got it, he's just showing off

    35. Re:Years worth of emails by dgbrownnt · · Score: 1

      Technically (wow, this is a tiny box), he did post 8 emails, it's just that 7 of them are him talking back and forth with noob@aol.com

    36. Re:Years worth of emails by WillKemp · · Score: 1

      but.. how do you classify the people who fit in BOTH groups

      A bug.

    37. Re:Years worth of emails by WillKemp · · Score: 1

      I befriended a cute computer programmer because I was one of the only people who knew the series of 1s and 0s she embroidered on her tote bag was a binary representation of "69".

      01101001? 1000101? 01101001? or even 0011011000111001?

      Oops! That's blown my cover...

    38. Re:Years worth of emails by Rune69 · · Score: 1

      Stop eating my lunch!

      --

      When faced with a problem, many web developers say "I know, I'll use JavaScript!".
      Now they have two problems.
    39. Re:Years worth of emails by Philip+Shaw · · Score: 1

      Epic fail: if you want to make that joke, you could at least have said :

      What are the other D types

      --
      "A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject."- Winston Churchill
    40. Re:Years worth of emails by deek · · Score: 1

      Heh. It's only an epic fail for you. I thought the joke had more immediate impact as it is.

  6. This is the sort of thing that belongs on TDWTF... by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... not slashdot.

  7. Allow us to disable Idle, please! by Brazilian+Geek · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Hey guys, how about allowing us to disable stories from Idle - if not disable, how about allowing us to show up on the main page minimized.

    --
    All browsers' default homepage should read: Don't Panic...
  8. Typical Slashdotter even if he doesn't know it by 4D6963 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everyone here acts like they are so much smarter than everyone else and that a teenager can't know what is right because he isn't fat enough from sitting around eating twinkys and playing games on the computer. You never even had a girlfriend I bet because you're to busy being smarter than everyone else.

    Despite a complete lack of clue he sounds just like any other Slashdotter.

    Scratch that, he does sound just like any other Slashdotter.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
    1. Re:Typical Slashdotter even if he doesn't know it by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 1

      I'm too stupid to understand what you said, your young teenage mind is obviously too intellectual for mine. Maybe if I stopped eating all these exquisite vegetables and exercising, and actually started eating twinkies and chatting it up here with you more I might be as smart as you... Oh sorry, I gotta go meet my girlfriend now...

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
    2. Re:Typical Slashdotter even if he doesn't know it by maxume · · Score: 1

      Your doing it wrong.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Typical Slashdotter even if he doesn't know it by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      My point was that he talks as bad about Slashdotter as any other Slashdotter does. Often on Slashdot do you hear self deprecating comments and people joking that we don't have girlfriends or a life, and also regular complaints of how we think we're smarter than anyone else.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    4. Re:Typical Slashdotter even if he doesn't know it by D+Ninja · · Score: 3, Funny

      No. You're doing it wrong.

    5. Re:Typical Slashdotter even if he doesn't know it by maxume · · Score: 1

      Is not. You is.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:Typical Slashdotter even if he doesn't know it by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Actually it was +1 Funny, +1 Insightful and +1 Informative. I guess the Funny one was for the part you didn't like.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    7. Re:Typical Slashdotter even if he doesn't know it by Dean+Edmonds · · Score: 1

      I once thought that Slashdot comments demonstrated the lowest that the net had to offer.

      Then I started reading YouTube comments...

      --

      -deane

  9. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    WTF? Is that it?! 2 emails? Where's the rest of it? What do I pay you for? WHat are you doing on the internet if you can't share more than 2 emails? Grrr! I'm so angry!!!

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Angry? U r angry? U can't know what is angry because u r a fat teenager fat from sitting around eating twinkys and playing games on the computer.

      If u ever even had a girlfriend i bet ud know what is angry because that fat bitch would sit around eating all ur twinkys .

    2. Re:Huh? by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 1

      Fortunately this article is a dupe, so you can see the other amusing emails before he posts the next installment!

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    3. Re:Huh? by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 1

      On second glance, I don't see the emails he posted here, but I swear I have read the aol user letter previously. Anyone else find it?

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    4. Re:Huh? by Rick+Bentley · · Score: 1

      Sorry, my little brother wrote that. But can you post more than 2 e-mails?

      --
      My favorite quote doesn't fit into 120 characters. Now no one will like me.
  10. I'm mildly amused by RLiegh · · Score: 1

    These were cute enough -particularly the last one.

  11. Oh crap by Brazilian+Geek · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sorry for that, I just saw the option in the Index > Section preferences.

    Sorry...

    --
    All browsers' default homepage should read: Don't Panic...
    1. Re:Oh crap by sinistermidget · · Score: 5, Funny

      Too bad. You should have sent an irate email about it to slashdot. It looks like samzenpus can use the material.

  12. Incredible by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

    I'm at a loss for words.... I can only say that I hope that was some sort of joke on their part, but I don't think it was.

  13. I guess we're all supposed to share or something by Fox_1 · · Score: 1
    Wasn't a lot of content above, and I suspect in this community we all have gems of emails from the past - one a friend showed me yesterday went something like this:

    Cutsie nickname for Tech Support guy,
    I'm not sure who the 'lusers' are, but that language may not be right for a mail list that has x senior person and y manager on it. Just a thought to help you along.
    Toodles
    Cutsie nickname for coworker

    --
    The rock, the vulture, and the chain
  14. Funny but... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

    Even for slashdot, this seems irrelevant.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  15. Drink it in? Huh? by nurb432 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Come on guys... Its just 2 emails.. thats more of a droplet of morning mist as it condensates on the leaf of a dandelion and not worthy of even remotely referring it to as a taste..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Drink it in? Huh? by garcia · · Score: 1

      I get better e-mails than that to my own personal website. I "review" restaurants for fun and routinely end up with resumes for job applicants, complaints about overcharges, questions about hosting events there, and sometimes even death threats from the owners themselves.

      If this is the best Slashdot can do (BTW, why the fuck is the comment box ~35 characters wide?) then I'm disappointed.

      We needs JonKatz back to up the annoyance ante!

    2. Re:Drink it in? Huh? by againjj · · Score: 1

      (BTW, why the fuck is the comment box ~35 characters wide?)

      When replying, click Options, under Comment Box Size, set Rows and Columns to what you want, click save, and the next time you make a comment, it is a better size!

      Though why it doesn't resize the box currently open, I have no idea. Seems dumb to me.

      (repoat of my earlier comment.)

    3. Re:Drink it in? Huh? by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      (BTW, why the fuck is the comment box ~35 characters wide?)

      Safari allows textarea boxes, including Slashdot comment boxes, to be arbitrarily resized by the user. But I've always thought the default size seemed pretty reasonable to me.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    4. Re:Drink it in? Huh? by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      I'm actually quite fond of the taste of dandelion-flavoured morning mist condensation, thank you very much you taste-challenged, insensitive colloidal topsoil structure!

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    5. Re:Drink it in? Huh? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      You must have a lot of weeds in your yard.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  16. D'oh by greywire · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know, I was going to post a whole rant about how you got me all excited to read about some really funny emails from a bunch of idiot readers only to find you only posted two of them, and only the first one was kinda funny.

    But then I realized maybe the whole point of setting us up for nothing was to see how many irate people would sent you hate mail and post rants about the pointlessness of this article, thus bringing the whole thing full circle:

    10 Get irate email
    20 post lame article about it
    30 goto 10

    --
    -- Senior Software Engineer, Attorney appearance services, locallawyerapp.com.
    1. Re:D'oh by NizzyWizzy4Shizzy · · Score: 1

      filename = "job_security.bat"

    2. Re:D'oh by greywire · · Score: 1

      oh, yes, the obligatory profit. Damn, I keep forgetting my memes.

      Imagine a beowulf cluster of these; because I, for one, welcome our disagree-mailing overlords who probably don't use linux and who certainly feel as though they are being censo@#$@#[NO CARRIER]

      --
      You have removed from system for over memeing. All your base are belong to us.

      --
      -- Senior Software Engineer, Attorney appearance services, locallawyerapp.com.
    3. Re:D'oh by tolkienfan · · Score: 1

      Ah, but did ya have to write it in Basic? PS My brother wrote that. Can you fix my internet, please?

    4. Re:D'oh by greywire · · Score: 1

      $irateEmails = new email();

      foreach ($irateEmail as $mail) {
          $mail->post();
          profit();
      }

      Happy now?

      --
      -- Senior Software Engineer, Attorney appearance services, locallawyerapp.com.
    5. Re:D'oh by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1
      Judging by the article, I think you mean:

      0 define ONE = 1
      1 define TWO = 2
      2 define ZERO = 0
      3 define THREE = 3
      10 my_I = ZERO
      20 get irate email
      30 post lame article
      40 if my_I == ONE then my_I = TWO
      50 if my_I == ZERO then my_I = ONE
      60 if my_I != THREE then goto 20
      70 goto exit

      Because really, crappy articles deserves crappy pseudocode

    6. Re:D'oh by MoreDruid · · Score: 1
      ugh... you forgot:

      40 ???
      50 Profit!!!!!!

      --
      The best weapon of a dictatorship is secrecy, but the best weapon of a democracy should be the weapon of openness.
    7. Re:D'oh by graveyhead · · Score: 1

      Yes yes! And then they will have a massive database full of hate and idiocy. Oh wait, maybe they already have that ;-)

      --
      std::disclaimer<std::legalese> sig=new std::disclaimer; sig->dump(); delete sig;
  17. The ladies by qoncept · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you ask a chick what she looks for in a man, she'll say a good sense of humor. It's a complete lie -- what she really wants is a good looking dude. That would mean you are screwed. You might be tempted at that point to feel a little better, saying "Hey, at least I do have a good sense of humor.."

    But you don't. You clearly posted these support emails thinking they would be good for a laugh, but, instead, they were just really boring.

    --
    Whale
    1. Re:The ladies by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Women don't know what they want. They say they want a kind, generous, man that can make them laugh, but they're always with some asshole that calls them "bitch" and slaps them around.

      They want the kind, generous men as friends; they want a tough guy in bed.

      Treat a whore like a lady and she'll act like a lady. Treat a lady like a whore and she'll suck your dick.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    2. Re:The ladies by JerBear0 · · Score: 1

      You do realize this is /., not the BET forums, right?

      --
      Bad experience is a school that only fools keep going to.
    3. Re:The ladies by genner · · Score: 1

      I assume you mean a definately rich and maybe good looking dude.

    4. Re:The ladies by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      If you ask a chick what she looks for in a man, she'll say a good sense of humor. It's a complete lie -- what she really wants is a good looking dude.

      There are two ways to make an impression on a woman.

      1. The way to a mans heart is through his stomach. The way to a womans heart is through her clothes. Not by ripping them off of her but by commenting on them.

      2. It helps if you can make a woman laugh. It helps a LOT. So long as its not your taking your pants down that starts her laughing you are generally doing well.

      And, despite being on /. I have 'been with' more women than I can count And I can count higher than 50. Lots higher

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    5. Re:The ladies by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Yes, most /.er's are unfamiliar with these "ladies" that the GP mentioned.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    6. Re:The ladies by LearnToSpell · · Score: 1

      Is Wayne Brady gonna have to choke a bitch?

    7. Re:The ladies by corbettw · · Score: 2, Funny

      God, I hope this "post anonymously" button works, or else the wife is gonna be pissed...

      You'd let all of Slashdot miss out on comedy gold to save your marriage? Bros before hos, dude.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    8. Re:The ladies by Valdrax · · Score: 2, Insightful

      God, I hope this "post anonymously" button works, or else the wife is gonna be pissed...

      You could always just let their air out of her.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    9. Re:The ladies by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Dude, I have hazel eyes, BET is not my cup of tea. As I'm a nerd, whores are a blessing; I'd never get laid otherwise. I'm one of those nice guys with a sense of humor they say they want.

      And, all woman are whores. The cheapest sex I ever had cost me a draft Budweiser, the most expensive cost me a house, a car, and part of my pension!

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  18. Ok, well kinda by sdemjanenko · · Score: 1

    Well these are ok but not great. I would imagine that you guys have some amazing ones but these are just above the level of ordinary complaints. Anyway an interesting topic, can't wait to see more (hopefully really good ones)

  19. The internet is not a big truck! by theCat · · Score: 1

    If I were doing helpdesk I'd work this link into MOST of my replies:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cZC67wXUTs

    It is *that* helpful.

    -cb

    --
    =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
  20. Priceless by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh man, those were priceless! Of course, so are grass clippings.

    1. Re:Priceless by cain · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Priceless by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      REALLY insulting grass clippings. I know, I hear them too.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    3. Re:Priceless by CronicBurn · · Score: 1

      Oh man, those were priceless! Of course, so are grass clippings.

      Which are incidentally, when mixed with pastel water paints, the same color as the Style Sheet above.

      --
      if I were able to see further, it was because I stood on the shoulders of Giants -Newton
    4. Re:Priceless by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

      s/priceless/worthless

  21. You actually read email? by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I guess that's easier than fixing bugs.

    1234567890123456789012

    (Numbers represent the width of the comment box in firefox running on linux)

  22. Let's be grateful. by NightFalcon90909 · · Score: 1

    Sure there weren't as many as you might have like, or I might have liked, but they were funny! And they did say there would be more, and at least they put anything up at all...

  23. And they still haven't by g0bshiTe · · Score: 4, Funny

    fixed my internet.
    I hope you know I called Google and told them to remove you from the search list for "fixing the internet"
    I swear you guys are like the Maytag Repair man of the internet.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    1. Re:And they still haven't by Stachybotris · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is, when I googled 'help with the internet', the first two hits were for IE 7 and support.microsoft.com. WTF?

    2. Re:And they still haven't by dgun · · Score: 1

      fixed my internet.

      You mean, internets.

      --
      FAQs are evil.
    3. Re:And they still haven't by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, so sorry. Fixed my inddardnets.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  24. Tagging Beta by bugg_tb · · Score: 4, Informative

    You know I've been reading slashdot for years, long before the tagging stuff came in and its taken until reading this article to realise that you click the little arrows to add tags, I always wondered how it was done :)

    1. Re:Tagging Beta by Peyna · · Score: 1

      A uid of 581786 has been reading slashdot for years? Crap, wonder how long it's been for me.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Tagging Beta by graveyhead · · Score: 1

      Isn't a switch-down triangle a pretty standard UI feature? Or, I'm just so blinded by building sites/software for so long that these things just seem natural to me?

      --
      std::disclaimer<std::legalese> sig=new std::disclaimer; sig->dump(); delete sig;
  25. Hey! by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

    Who gave them permission to use my photo?

    Signed

    T.P. Gumby The Postman

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  26. Now I know by mschuyler · · Score: 1

    Now I know why it says: "Idle.slashdot.org is a total waste of your time. Never go there." I didn't; it came to me. Oh, well...

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    1. Re:Now I know by Daimanta · · Score: 1

      Well, they were trying to be smart and they were also trying to attach two meanings to this sentence.

      They failed.

      It has only one meaning.

      This section is a BIG WASTE OF TIME. Fuck it.

      Never go here.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
  27. Not a stylesheet... by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...more a grotesquesheet.

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  28. this part killed me by unity100 · · Score: 1

    You never even had a girlfriend I bet because you're to busy being smarter than everyone else. Fuck you stop sending mail just because you can't handle me!

    HANDLING ME ! YOU CANT DO IT !!!!

    this part is the killer

    1. Re:this part killed me by genner · · Score: 2, Funny

      First IDLE now this.
      You guys had a board meeting didn't you?
      How many times do I have to warn you about those!

    2. Re:this part killed me by Creepy · · Score: 1

      you mean they got BORED in a meeting (don't we all?) and decided to do something productive during that big 5 hour power point presentation. That or slow news day. Or maybe the nukes are on the way and this is their little way of trying to humor us before the end - I don't keep up with that kind of stuff.

    3. Re:this part killed me by genner · · Score: 1

      you mean they got BORED in a meeting (don't we all?) and decided to do something productive during that big 5 hour power point presentation. That or slow news day. Or maybe the nukes are on the way and this is their little way of trying to humor us before the end - I don't keep up with that kind of stuff.

      Well yes they probly got bored fell asleep and let the idiots in suits make decisions.

      snore...snore....."What do you think Johnson?"....*erk* ...good idea sir we'll implement that....particular....idea.....immediately.

      And thats why meetings are dangerous.

  29. Best reply wins... by RingDev · · Score: 2, Funny

    An evening of navel gazing with CowboyNeal!

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:Best reply wins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Here would be my reply to the first guy:

      Dear Sir,

      Thank you for taking the Internet Intelligence Test.

      Unfortunately, you are not smart enough to use the internet. For your own safety, please cancel your AOL account immediately, and sell your modem. If you do not, you will be mercilessly humiliated by all of the people who actually have a clue.

      Sincerely,
      The Internet

    2. Re:Best reply wins... by Eudial · · Score: 1

      -Rick

      Dear Rick, Will you please linking to your music video everywhere? I have already seen it and it's honestly not -that- good. What is it with you? Anyways, please stop.

      ~ E.

      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    3. Re:Best reply wins... by isorox · · Score: 1

      Dear Sir,

      How do you know I'm a man

      Thank you for taking the Internet Intelligence Test.

      Unfortunately, you are not smart enough to use the internet.

      What's the internet?

      For your own safety,

      What safety? PC World say I'm safe on line because I placed this box on top of my tv

      please cancel your AOL account immediately

      I have an account?

      and sell your modem.

      What's a modem?

      If you do not, you will be mercilessly humiliated by all of the people who actually have a clue.

      What clue?

    4. Re:Best reply wins... by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Don't be so hard on Rick. After all, you and he've known each other for so long. Didn't he tell you he wouldn't give you up, wouldn't let you down, wouldn't run around and desert you?

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  30. Colbert by Xelios · · Score: 1

    The first installment of Slashdot's 434 part series Better Know a Noob!

    --
    Murphey's fighting Occam, and we're in the stands.
  31. Please stop by MisterSquirrel · · Score: 1

    Please stop clogging the internet with your slashdotty posts now. You're slowing down my porn downloads.

  32. Yeah, but.. by mr_resident · · Score: 1

    ..the picture of Steve Ballmer demonstrating Microsoft's next version of Exchange is pretty educational.

  33. Re:PLEASE.. Make it stop! by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

    stop watching 2 girls 1 cup then

    --
    IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
  34. Perfectly logical user by ishmalius · · Score: 1

    If you don't want to help, then why ARE you on Google? ^^ If you look at it from the correspondent's point of view and with their experience of the Net, that is a very logical and valid question to ask.

  35. Similar job by tonyray · · Score: 1

    Many /. readers work in similar jobs. My favorite is a subscriber that cancelled his account because the only websites he could go to were pornography sites and he was sure we were causing his problem. He was a long-time employee of one of the local university's IT department, so he knew we were doing it.

  36. Re:mails in heat by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

    Erm... that shifty looking guy that told you "Lulu can handle all males"... well, he wasn't talking about a publisher.

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  37. Do they speak English in What? by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seriously, "Slashdot's Disagree Mail"? Do you people speak and/or understand English on any kind of working basis?

    (Feel free to file this message with the "disagree mail".)

    --
    If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    1. Re:Do they speak English in What? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Ugh. It's a euphemism for what is commonly referred to as "hate mail".

      I think we all can agree that it's time for a kindler, gentler slashdot.

      But really, are you really that dense? Oh... wait... UserID 1280296... I think I understand now. Never mind.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:Do they speak English in What? by Ma8thew · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's a joke. Email sounds like disagree mail. Of course, it wasn't a very good joke, I had to explain it.

    3. Re:Do they speak English in What? by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 1

      I'm complaining because it sounds idiotic and does not fit English grammer, not because I was incapable of understanding it, you enormous fucking asshole.

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    4. Re:Do they speak English in What? by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 2, Funny

      And of course in fitting with one of the Laws of the Internet, my complaint about grammar contains a misspelling. Sigh.

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    5. Re:Do they speak English in What? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      post an idiotic question, get an idiotic answer.

      Just doing my best to make idle as bad as digg.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    6. Re:Do they speak English in What? by pbhj · · Score: 1

      I think you missed it, it's supposed to be a pun on E-mail, disagreE-mail, get it?

      No, no it's not funny it is supposed to be intellectual humour, if you're not wetting your pants laughing right now you're thick.

    7. Re:Do they speak English in What? by x2A · · Score: 1

      Now now, there's no such things as idiotic questions, only idiotic people.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    8. Re:Do they speak English in What? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I think we just found the poster of disagree mail #2.

      There's a time and place for grammar naziism, but the title of anything is neither. Its called poetic license, and most writers use it with subjects, titles and headlines as a way of putting a trademark on an otherwise boring statement.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    9. Re:Do they speak English in What? by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 1

      There's a big difference between complaining because of bad grammar, and complaining because a title has such bad grammar that it no longer makes any real sense, and sounds like nails on slate.

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    10. Re:Do they speak English in What? by DeeFresh · · Score: 1

      You seem to have mistaken a lame joke for improper use of English.

      DisagreE-MAIL, get it?

  38. Is that what it takes? by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

    Is that what it takes to get on the front page? Write you some emphatic, whiny email, littered with "creative" English usage?

    I think I can handle that.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  39. I'll take your two emails and raise you one call: by jacquesm · · Score: 1

    A long long time ago, in the dark ages of the internet, we launched this site called 'camarades.com', which was about hosting people's webcams.

    This worked pretty good, but occasionally someone would run into trouble with the software. So, stupid us, we put our phone number in the software, so people would call us, at all times of day.

    One evening it's my turn to man the phone, this American chick calls and complains her cam isn't working. So I talk her through the setup procedure and at some point it starts to work. For a verification she asks me "so, what am I wearing then" (she refuses to believe the cam is now online and visible to everybody), I answer: "Well, from where I'm sitting it seems you're not wearing much, if anything". She starts calling me a filthy pervert and slams down the phone :)

  40. If this sort of thing entertains you... by seanonymous · · Score: 1

    I highly recommend Tripadvisor's blog: http://tripadvisor.typepad.com/ I strongly feel that the support staff of all organizations should be able to post their favorite missives, for all the world to see.

  41. Twinkes = I.Q. by eagee · · Score: 2, Funny

    Good thing I ate all those twinkies!

  42. needed more emails. by jdinkel · · Score: 2, Funny

    This was like promising sex and delivering a strip tease :(

  43. First one is actually a useful lesson... by Urban+Garlic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Many, many users have the problem that the first writer had, namely, they have no idea where the "internal boundaries" are between various entities available on their computer. From their point of view, the modern GUI desktop is an undifferentiated sea of icons and buttons and text boxes. Users know what sequences to use to achieve a desired effect, but as far as how it works or even what the components are, or which ones are local and which ones are remote, they may not know, and the interface doesn't always tell them.
    I recently had this experience doing tech-support for my father, who was visiting me. His e-mail stopped working, because his local POP/SMTP mail client will only talk to his ISP's servers when connecting from within the ISP's domain. At home, he's on the ISP's cable modem, and it works. I have a different ISP, so it doesn't work at my house. I switched him to the web client, which he was able to adapt to, but I'm not sure he ever really understood why he had to do that.
    I can easily imagine that the guy in the first example normally had his browser default to open to his ISP's portal page, and it might have even had an e-mail link that send messages to the ISP's support team. So he goes to another computer and does what he thinks is the same thing -- opens a browser, fusses with it until a page comes up with something that looks like an e-mail link, clicks on it and asks for help. He's at the library, maybe some joker has set the default home page to slashdot, maybe it autocompleted it out of the history, who knows.
    Ignorant, yes. Stupid? Only if it persists...

    --
    2*3*3*3*3*11*251
    1. Re:First one is actually a useful lesson... by corbettw · · Score: 4, Funny

      Damn, my ex-wife hangs out on Slashdot.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    2. Re:First one is actually a useful lesson... by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      What's his name?

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  44. better then this by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 1

    sort of sophmoronic fun wd be serious discussion of user comments re /. - eg, i have written to /. about dislike changes last year. surely a lot of good stuff in that sort of email

  45. first mail by joe+155 · · Score: 1

    I kind of wish that the first set of emails had a date on it. I tried typing "help with the internet" into Google and got just a plain boring list of people who offer various level of tech support as well as some ISP's tech support sites.

    Also, why is the comment box here crap - has /. designed this page to be terrible; the rest of /. works fine...

    --
    *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
  46. So now a breach of privacy doesn't matter? by anomnomnomymous · · Score: 1

    So where are all the rants about this breach of privacy?

    I find it funny to see how this site's community is always uptight about (online) privacy, yet doesn't seem to give a sh*t when it's done for their own amusement.

    Even if the emails are quite funny, and might have been sent to the wrong adress, it does not justify to publish these imho.

    --
    When you shoot a mime, do you use a silencer?
  47. 10 = both by PetiePooo · · Score: 1

    And if you don't get that, turn in your geek card to the closest LUG.

    1. Re:10 = both by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

      And if you don't get that, turn in your geek card to the closest LUG.

      Minor problem. If someone doesn't get the grandparent's joke, they SURE as heck won't get what a LUG is. And if you don't get that...well...I don't have anything witty to put in here.

      Dang.

  48. Re:I guess we're all supposed to share or somethin by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    That's why we refer to them as the id-10t errors we keep getting. The CTO one year had it on a pie chart covering expenses for that year, most of the IT department shit themselves laughing at that company meeting.

    For all I know, it's still in the trouble ticket system at comcast as a problem code.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  49. Year of Linux on the desktop coming soon. by fyoder · · Score: 1

    That first email gives me hope that one day linux will dominate the desktop. Such people could be just as easily confused by linux as by windows, so why not? It just has to come preinstalled on computers. That's what they curse. The computer. And whoever google sends them to for help with it.

    --
    Loose lips lose spit.
  50. One of the biggest ones... by kdawson+(3715) · · Score: 2, Funny

    I once got an email bomb where someone called me gay. This was back around 2000 before we implemented filters. My mailbox, about 20mb at the time, was completely filled. I kind of laughed because of the irony (it's true) but was livid at the fact that I had to write a script to clear the emails out of our ancient POP server.

  51. Disillusioned by Experiment+626 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've always pictured the life of a Slashdot editor as a glamorous one. Partying with hot supermodels like Hugh Heffner, flying around the world in the Slashdot Learjet, racing Ferraris against CowboyNeal, pouring hot grits on Natalie Portman... that sort of thing.

    After reading this article and discovering that the above emails were "very special" "gems" that brightened the editors' day, I think I may have to lower my image of them a bit.

    1. Re:Disillusioned by David_W · · Score: 4, Funny

      Partying with hot supermodels like Hugh Heffner

      Hugh Heffner is not a hot supermodel.

  52. How does Help with the internet bring up /. ? by Nick+Ives · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I tried googling - even putting it in quotes, which a n00b probably wouldn't think of - and the closest I got was a link to this article!

    I'm not accusing those emails of being made up but I do think someone was pulling your leg :)

    --
    Nick
    1. Re:How does Help with the internet bring up /. ? by Arimus · · Score: 1

      That first email isn't dated... so unless you could some how run queries back in time its hard to say if /. never featured in a "help with the internet" query.

      (Possibly some old story using those words? )

      Or as you say some india delta one zero tango pulling the editors leg...

      --
      --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
  53. samzenpus... PLONK! by splatter · · Score: 1

    samzenpus welcome to the plonk file.

    http://idle.slashdot.org/help

    Click the box by his name and hit save...

    --
    "(I) have this unfortunate condition that causes me not to believe a single thing any politician says when a mic's on.
  54. Worst. Mailbag. Ever. by whyde · · Score: 1

    At least the BBspot Mailbag is entertaining. No, I'm not providing a link.

    (Oh, and idle.slashdot.org should just redirect to a site that's good at it.)

  55. P.S. by Fatigatti · · Score: 1

    The P.S. is simply perfect. He couldn't delete what his "brother" wrote. Is like the guy sending a letter to his son and saying "P.S.: I'd like to send you some money, but I've closed the envelope."

    --
    Cha Cha Cha, eternamente gracias.
  56. Oh please.. by Khyber · · Score: 1

    I could probably find better emails to laugh at in /b/.

    Ah well, I didn't design this site.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  57. Preview by Nick+Mitchell · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe the editor posted before previewing?

  58. Troll baiting are we? by Deathdonut · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While I got a nice chuckle from these two mails and appreciate the fact that they were posted, I can't see this making life easy for the poor guy.

    He's probably going to receive 20,000 troll emails over the course of the next month.

  59. Re:Needs more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You spelled MOAR wrong.

  60. Dear Slashdot, by Thelasko · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How do I mod down an entire article?

    Thanks,
    Thelasko

    P.S. Worst article ever!

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    1. Re:Dear Slashdot, by Maelwryth · · Score: 5, Informative

      "How do I mod down an entire article?"

      Go to the Firehose.

      --
      I reserve the write to mangle english.
    2. Re:Dear Slashdot, by SharpFang · · Score: 1
      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    3. Re:Dear Slashdot, by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      True. Now how do you mod down whole subdomain?

      idle.slashdot.org (-1, Troll)

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    4. Re:Dear Slashdot, by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Do articles written by the editors themselves even go to the Firehose?

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    5. Re:Dear Slashdot, by Maelwryth · · Score: 1

      "True. Now how do you mod down whole subdomain?"
      By not visiting it?

      --
      I reserve the write to mangle english.
    6. Re:Dear Slashdot, by Maelwryth · · Score: 1

      "Do articles written by the editors themselves even go to the Firehose?"
      This one was. Maybe there is a just_cracked_the_firehose dept though.

      --
      I reserve the write to mangle english.
    7. Re:Dear Slashdot, by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

      This article is already at -1, what do you think Idle is?

  61. Thought this would be amusing, wrong as usual! by synriga · · Score: 1

    Just another example of "What is funny for me must be funny for you" syndrome. Too bad, because I'm sure there are much better examples of idiot correspondence in the mailbag. Strike one. If #2 is as uninteresting and this one, I'll be using the gray matter filter in the future.

  62. more needed by m0llusk · · Score: 4, Funny

    time to crank up the weirdness, people

  63. More stupid people and IT pros by daveywest · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since idle.slashdot.org is failing to deliver on the promise to waste my life away, I present http://rinkworks.com/stupid/

    1. Re:More stupid people and IT pros by Paranatural · · Score: 2

      Mod parent up, that site has a wealth of funny.

      Even funnier, I think, than the computer stupidities are the non-computer ones. Sample faves:

      "A small deer came into my camp and stole my bag of pickles. Is there a way I can get reimbursed? Please call."

      Sadly, GWB Cut all funding for deer-related pickle reimbursement.

      "Found a smoldering cigarette left by a horse."

      Damn horses, always littering with their filthy habits.

      "The places where trails do not exist are not well marked."

      This must be rectified immediately.

      "When do the deer become elk?"

      When the hour is late and you've had 10 too many beers, boy.

  64. Dear slashdot: by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Could you add a new rule to the front page:

    if(category=="idle") {
        dont_post_in_front_page();
    }

    Thank you.

    1. Re:Dear slashdot: by zobier · · Score: 2, Informative

      Come on, you're not seriously going to make a function to not do something?
      How about:

      if ( category == "idle" ) {
          post_in_front_page = false;
      }

      Or how about going to Help & Preferences > Sections > Idle > Never?

      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
  65. Let me be the first to say by LM741N · · Score: 1

    that I as one, fully support our new disagreeable Slashdot overlords.

  66. Sage by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

    Sage

    --
    But... the future refused to change.
  67. ANUS.com letters are worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    http://www.anus.com/metal/about/letters/

    Be thankful the people who write to you are only semi-literate.

  68. The rest were ok by symbolset · · Score: 4, Funny

    But I didn't care for the last one or the first one.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  69. Intriguing by Compulawyer · · Score: 3, Funny
    Dear Sir:

    I am intrigued by your thoughts and ideas and would subscribe to your newsletter or pamphlet.

    Respectfully,

    Intrigued

    --

    Laws affecting technology will always be bad until enough techies become lawyers.

  70. What? Really? by Zadaz · · Score: 1

    Wow.

    I'm not going to say something as unlikely that I'm storming out and never coming back, but... I'm certainly going to cut down my reading. Which cuts down my posting, and the discussions are what /. is all about.

    I mean, what the hell is going on today? I read Slashdot from a newsreader. Since it's a newsfeed and /. doesn't offer me any way to filter the posts in rss I get a certain amount of cruft. I usually try to read some stories that don't relate directly to my job, but might be interesting or useful. But I think I'm done with that. If idle.slashdot posts are going in the feed, they've just crossed that noise-to-signal ratio where I'm only going to click through to stories that I'm 100% sure are worth my time.

    If I want to fuck off I've got the whole rest of the Internet right next door. Slashdot doesn't need to help me, or anyone who reads it to waste time.

    And what's with these emails above? I've got two problems with this. One is frankly, should you grow up a little bit, at least in your public face, and not make fun of these poor idiots? Yeah, sure, giggle giggle, it's fun in private, but this is like egging the short bus.

    And secondly, doesn't everyone have examples exactly like this? The second person's email is de rigeur for the Internet and provides no amusement. Hasn't anyone ever read an unmoderated forum? And the first is clueless, but I worked at a small web design agency back in the 90's and every phone had AOL's toll free number stuck on a post-it to deal with the many calls we got exactly like that. "Hello, I'd like to buy an internet please." "Sure thing, but we're not a sales office. Please call 1-888-265-8001 and they'll fix you right up."

    Or we could have argued with an ignorant person, also known as wresting with a pig.

    I think the second email was a valid criticism of the way samzenpus dealt with the first writer.

  71. white text on a green background is soothing, by jessica_alba · · Score: 2, Interesting

    black on white seems almost spiteful. can someone recommend/write a firefox add-on?

  72. It's nothing less than the return of... by tobe · · Score: 1

    SEGFAULT !!!

    Alright...

  73. Wow, that white-on-green really hurt my eyes. by pterandon · · Score: 1

    Where's the address to rant?

  74. He's Right, you know by neil-ngc · · Score: 1

    You sorry bastards shouldn't be on google if you don't want to help people. Jeez.

  75. v1.1 by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I forgot the "Post Reply" standalone page:

    @namespace url(http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml);

    @-moz-document domain(slashdot.org) {
    .inline_comment .generalbody {
    padding-right: 30px !important;
    }
    .inline_comment .generalbody textarea, #postercomment {
    width: 100% !important;
    }
    }

  76. Seconded by Mortiss · · Score: 1

    Just wanted to add my voice to everyone else who thinks that this section has no place on this site...
    Editors (and any corporations who may be behind it), please reconsider before this site ends up like Digg et al. and starts spiraling towards the "OMG LOLZ!!!!11" mentality.

    P.S. It was so much fun reading this extremely long and engaging article containing *gasp* two emails.

  77. Can I have some more, sir, please? by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    Can I have some more?

    Please, sir, can I have some more?

    Please?

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  78. Consider the jihad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Slashdot's editors' crimes are not revealed in this article. Visit anti-slash.org to learn the full extent of their transgressions.

    In Jihad,

    jihadi_31337

  79. What to google? by ninjapiratemonkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So can anyone figure out what you actually google for help with the internet to get slashdot in the top ten?

    --
    01110000 01010111 01101110 00110011 01100100
    1. Re:What to google? by drew · · Score: 1

      Maybe the email was sent back when Slashdot actually carried useful information.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
  80. So if there are so many... by FSWKU · · Score: 1

    If there are so many of these emails, then why only post this small snippet of a supposedly larger flood of alleged hillarity? And shouldnt there be a new section specifically for this? Maybe bash.slashdot.org, so we can actually rate the emails and the boring/stupid ones can disappear forever?

    --
    "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
  81. Eight emails by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    Technically, it's Eight emails; but some of them were from /. to the AOL user.

  82. Yeah, I had dual monitors in '88... by Grog6 · · Score: 3, Funny

    CGA and Text. OOOOOOOH!

    Then I bought a Hercules graphics card, and lost that capability...

    the dual 24" widescreen monitors I have now are driven by a graphics card that has 50x the memory of my hard drive that was in that system, and 1000x the memory.

    Windows runs just as fast, tho...

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
  83. Send more mail by jagdish · · Score: 1

    It is obvious that samzenpus has an acute shortage of funny mail to post here. I propose that we send more mail to make his job easier.

    And also, it seems like he has too much time on his hands.

  84. Re:I'll take your two emails and raise you one cal by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

    Well, I think we all understand why you didn't cancel that phone number. Good on ya.

    --
    - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  85. Re:This is the sort of thing that belongs on TDWTF by corbettw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Except that there, it would be funny. Alex is a little better at setting up the joke and finding the punchline. Sam dragged that first letter out longer than an SNL skit.

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  86. Re:I'll take your two emails and raise you one cal by corbettw · · Score: 1

    Pics or it didn't happen.

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  87. So where are the guidelines for for sending a submission?

    --
    I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
  88. say what? by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

    Are you serious? I get that many odd emails in a half day period at my job related to network connectivity issues, and i'm a LEASING CONSULTANT for a housing complex. Man up, /., and fix your fucking CSS themes.

  89. Re:Why not allow a reverse order ranking for readi by ozphx · · Score: 1

    I browse normally with:

    +1 to short comment, AC, Troll, Flamebait

    Makes /. a much more interesting place.

    --
    3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
  90. Gee, that was a lot.. by bogomipe · · Score: 1

    And I was expecting to waste at least half of my working day reading these. Was this the first of a two part series?

    --
    - mipe -
  91. You were lucky... by Fallen+Andy · · Score: 1
    When I was a lad c.a. 14 yrs old we hand punched those hollerith cards using a lookup table on the wall, sent off our cards and lo and behold three weeks later we got back - Syntax error on line 1050.

    Andy

  92. True or not, one of my favorites... by UncleWilly · · Score: 5, Funny

    The story behind the letter below is that there is this nutball in
    Newport, RI, named Scott Williams who digs things out of his backyard
    and sends the stuff he finds to the Smithsonian Institute, labeling
    them with scientific names, insisting that they are actual archaeological finds.
    This guy really exists and does this in his spare time!

    Here's the actual response from the Smithsonian Institute. Bear this
    in mind next time you think you are challenged in your duty to respond
    to a difficult situation in writing.

    Smithsonian Institution
    207 Pennsylvania Avenue
    Washington, DC 20078

    Dear Mr. Williams:
    Thank you for your latest submission to the Institute, labeled
    "93211-D, layer seven, next to the clothesline post . . .Hominid
    skull". We have given this specimen a careful and detailed
    examination, and regret to inform you that we disagree with your theory that it represents
    conclusive proof of the presence of Early Man in Charleston County two
    million years ago.

    Rather, it appears that what you have found is the head of a Barbie
    Doll, of the variety that one of our staff, who has small children,
    believes to be "Malibu Barbie". It is evident that you have given a
    great deal of thought to the analysis of this specimen, and you may be quite certain
    that those of us who are familiar with your prior work in the field
    were loathe to come to contradiction with your findings. However, we
    do feel there are a number of physical attributes of the specimen
    which might have tipped you off to its modern origin:
    1. The material is molded plastic. Ancient hominid remains are
    typically fossilized bone.
    2. The cranial capacity of the specimen is approximately 9 cubic
    centimeters, well below the threshold of even the earliest identified
    proto-homonids.
    3. The dentition pattern evident on the skull is more consistent
    with the common domesticated dog than it is with the ravenous
    man-eating Pliocene clams you speculate roamed the wetlands during that time.

    This latter finding is certainly one of the most intriguing hypotheses
    you have submitted in your history with this institution, but the
    evidence seems to weigh rather heavily against it. Without going into too much
    detail, let us say that:

    A. The specimen looks like the head of a Barbie doll that a dog
    has chewed on.
    B. Clams don't have teeth.

    It is with feelings tinged with melancholy that we must deny your
    request to have the specimen carbon-dated. This is partially due to
    the heavy load our lab must bear in its normal operation, and partly
    due to carbon-dating's notorious inaccuracy in fossils of recent geologic
    record.
    To the best of our knowledge, no Barbie dolls were produced prior to
    1956 AD, and carbon-dating is likely to produce wildly inaccurate
    results.
    Sadly, we must also deny your request that we approach the National
    Science Foundation Phylogeny Department with the concept of assigning
    your specimen the scientific name Australopithecus spiff-arino. Speaking
    personally, I, for one, fought tenaciously for the acceptance of your
    proposed taxonomy, but was ultimately voted down because the species
    name you selected

    1. Re:True or not, one of my favorites... by nharmon · · Score: 1

      Hey, thank you for posting that. I really got a good laugh! Nuts will be nuts, eh?

    2. Re:True or not, one of my favorites... by MBaldelli · · Score: 1

      Wow! *wiping tears from my eyes* This was fabulous. I need to share it around the office, I'm sure they'll appreciate the utter whacked attitude of some people here in the biggest little.

      --
      "The truth points to itself." - Kosh, Babylon5
    3. Re:True or not, one of my favorites... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1
      Great!

      Reminds me of this book, and this one.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    4. Re:True or not, one of my favorites... by Moghedien · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not true, but still entertaining.

      --
      I've come to... anesthetize you!
    5. Re:True or not, one of my favorites... by Metaphorically · · Score: 1

      Hilarious but, sadly, not real. At least according to snopes.

      I, for one, was eager to see the shelf with the exhumed barbie-head and rusty craftsman wrench.

      --
      more of the same on Twitter.
    6. Re:True or not, one of my favorites... by PIBM · · Score: 1

      It's sad that I have to do that but ...

      this letter has been around since the beginning of the internet (maybe sooner) and it was debunked, reasons were as such:

      Newsgroups: sci.skeptic,talk.origins
      Subject: Re: [Fwd: barbie]
      From: huston@access4.digex.net (Herb Huston)
      Date: 27 Jan 1997 22:12:41 -0500

      [...]

      There's no such place as "the Smithsonian Institute." There's no 207
      Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, and the Zip Code of 207 Pennsylvania Avenue, SE,
      is 20003.

      Anyway, it was a nice read :)

    7. Re:True or not, one of my favorites... by svnt · · Score: 1

      Not

  93. Yes huh hu by gx5000 · · Score: 1

    We are not alone...
    Spooky huh ;-)

    --
    End of Line.
  94. Slashdot is Georgening by whobutdrew · · Score: 1

    This sounds a lot like the Chronicles of George: http://chroniclesofgeorge.nanc.com/navmain.htm

    --
    In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not.
  95. Thanks by sanjacguy · · Score: 1

    Thanks for posting this, our IT department enjoyed it.

  96. If you are using an iPhone... by wattrlz · · Score: 1

    ...why would you be reading /. ?

  97. best thing I've seen in last couple of days by SmokinCruves · · Score: 1

    I have never laughed so hard in my life this was the best post ever! Congradulations you've been baited. Your lovely editor posts two disagree mails and you all go off the deep end! He doesn't have to post anything else you all made the post more then worth while. And what's funnier is you folks take yourselves seriously! Thank you Slashdot and your following for making my day golden... P.S: and some of you wonder why you can't get laid...

  98. "Teal"? by laburu · · Score: 1

    I'm afraid that, here, on Slashdot, we do not acknowledge the existence of a color by that name. Other purported color names that were likewise found to be wholly unnecessary include turquoise, azure, chartreuse, gainsboro, goldenrod, and moccasin. Note that the foregoing is not an exhaustive list. Please, consult with you friendly neighborhood slashbot before using these or any other words outside the basic English vocabulary. I mean, really, Gould... didn't you get the memo? :>

    Seriously, though, Slashdot's default color scheme assaults readers most grievously. But it is distinctive and memorable, isn't it? By which I mean to say that one doesn't easily forget being stabbed in the eyes.