Slashdot Mirror


Handling Caller ID Spoofing?

An anonymous reader writes "A nice little old lady I know has had her number spoofed by some car warranty scammers. They're calling hundreds of potential victims per day pretending to use her phone number, and the angry ones call her back; some of them have even left death threats. She's terrified. Some well-intending anti-telemarketing folks have posted her address on the 'net as well. How can we figure out where these scammer bastards are, and what's the state of the current legislation to prevent caller ID spoofing? I called the FBI in Boston (near where she lives) and they said they can't help. She's called her phone company, but they said they can't help either. She's had the same number for over 50 years and doesn't want to change it." If the Feds can't or won't handle it, what's the best approach here?

556 comments

  1. same here by Daver297 · · Score: 1

    I am in Maryland and myself, my girlfriend and my parents have all received these same calls

    --
    -Daver
    1. Re:same here by Z00L00K · · Score: 5, Informative

      The phone companies shall have so called call data records, often declared as CDR:s. These provide information about the calls made to/from a certain number. Using these records it is possible to back-track the phone call to the originating operator. The phone companies have a lot of information available to allow for tracking, but since it requires a lot of work to dig through the data they are very reluctant to do so.

      Another way is to catch on to the caller and check who purchased their service and then follow the money trail.

      Unfortunately it is possible that the caller that spoofs the number is offshore somewhere.

      And if the FBI won't help, I suggest that you also check other channels of law enforcement and keep everything in writing so that you have a history to refer to. Taking help from a lawyer may be one way to continue this. It's always interesting if you can get in touch with the right lawyer who knows which buttons to push to get some results.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:same here by Praxx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've gotten several of these calls as well, which I started receiving shortly after I took my vehicle in to a dealership to be serviced. It may be coincidental, but I suspect not. Anyway, the numbers were always had spoofed caller id numbers, but it was the same warranty 'company' every time. The people on the other line refused to give you any information whether it be phone numbers, physical location, etc. I asked several times to be taken off their list. My cell phone provider (T-Mobile) said there was nothing they could do, even though these calls were illegal.

      I stopped receiving these calls after awhile, I'm guessing this particular company moved on or got busted. Frankly, it's about time we had some ability as consumers to deal with this sort of fraud. The do-not-call laws do absolutely no good if these guys can spoof their numbers to get around being traced.

      --
      http://www.policystew.com/
    3. Re:same here by eggoeater · · Score: 3, Interesting

      She could file a john doe lawsuit and get the CDRs via subpoena ala RIAA and then sue the telemarketers for damages.

    4. Re:same here by wgoodman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I know that the way AT&T is set up, if you call a call phone and your caller ID is the number for that cell, it will not ask you for a password to check the voicemail. I've mentioned it numerous times to CSRs but they really don't seem to care. Seems like a pretty big security hole.

    5. Re:same here by Phrack · · Score: 4, Informative

      A CDR may or may not have accurate information as to the source of the call. If the call is entirely local (the LEC handles call termination on both ends as well as transit), then it should have all the information. However, if the call transits a different carrier, then the LEC that handles termination for the target of the scammer only knows the caller ID that was passed to it from the transit carrier. If it's unknown, then that's what is passed into the CDR. You may be able to glean other source information about the handoff to the transit carrier, then get THEM involved to find the call that was routed to that handoff at that time, and so on.

      Oh, and since those aren't her calls (the scammer wasn't calling HER), then you must have a subpoena. If one of the scam targets cooperates, then THEY might be able to request their own records, but to get intervening carriers to cooperate, you'll need a lawyer or law enforcement. I'd try the latter, first. Keywords like "terroristic threats" and such may get you some attention. Once you know it crosses state lines, and perhaps some idea of how wide sweeping the scope is, then you might have something the FBI can/will look at. Try your local state bureau of investigation first, as they may have more immediate resources.

      Ob. disclaimer: Though employed in telecom, I am not a lawyer.

      --
      Dump the IRS - http://www.fairtax.org
    6. Re:same here by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      The people on the other line refused to give you any information whether it be phone numbers, physical location, etc. I asked several times to be taken off their list.

      Perhaps you could try the opposite approach - act like you're really interested in what they're selling, eventually they have to give you some sort of company name, address, phone number etc. to make the sale, right?

    7. Re:same here by Dan+Ost · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've got AT&T on the home phone and I'm required to enter a password when I try to check my voicemail from the home phone.

      Maybe it's a regional thing (I was originally a BellSouth customer).

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    8. Re:same here by Still+an+AC · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yeah but they will only turn that data over to the government, for a 'modest' fee of course. Viva Amerika!

    9. Re:same here by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Informative

      However, if the call transits a different carrier, then the LEC that handles termination for the target of the scammer only knows the caller ID that was passed to it from the transit carrier.

      That's not entirely accurate. ANI exists separately from caller id and is generally much harder to spoof. The LEC probably has access to this information -- whether or not they will share it with you sans subpoena is another matter altogether.....

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    10. Re:same here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does AT&T have the option to always ask for a password regardless of where you are calling from? I know Sprint, Verizon, and my last two VOIP providers do. I do not know if they rely on the CID information or not but either way, the option to always ask for the password is available. You should use it. Just like the /. option to save your password in a cookie for auto-login, it is convenient but may not be secure. It is YOUR choice.

    11. Re:same here by Praxx · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you could try the opposite approach - act like you're really interested in what they're selling, eventually they have to give you some sort of company name, address, phone number etc. to make the sale, right?

      They ask for bank account numbers or credit card information, so you wouldn't even know what financial entity to go after until they've taken your money.

      --
      http://www.policystew.com/
    12. Re:same here by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 1

      One thing people might try is call screening via an old-style answering machine. Prominently note at the beginning of the message that "Scammers are fraudulently pretending to call from this number. I can do nothing about it, and I am sorry it is happening." Should shame most callers into hanging up, and you only need to deal with callers who hang long enough to leave a message.

      Whitelisting numbers you want to receive calls from might help, but you run the risk of blocking legit calls from unexpected numbers.

      If you have decently configurable voice mail settings (I use ViaTalk and they offer this option) you might set up a whitelist of numbers (or area codes) that trigger a ring, and have everything else go direct to your voicemail with a similar message.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    13. Re:same here by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 1

      Heck, if you're really nice, you might even mention the Do Not Call registry on your message. I don't know if they were scammers, but I was receiving 3-6 calls per day from the extended auto warranty pushers when I first signed up for my land line. 30-40 days after signing up for Do Not Call they stopped calling. It doesn't help you personally, but callers might appreciate it if they don't already know about it.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    14. Re:same here by twistedsymphony · · Score: 4, Informative

      on my voice mail it says to "enter your password followed by the # key" but if you're calling from the number associated by the account you can simply press "#" and get your voice mail... it doesn't say it on the message but that's how it works.

    15. Re:same here by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "And if the FBI won't help, I suggest that you also check other channels of law enforcement and keep everything in writing so that you have a history to refer to."

      More to the point...is there actually anything ILLEGAL at all about spoofing a caller ID number? I don't know of any laws that require you to give out by any means, the phone number you are calling from.

      Since there is no fraud being committed here as far as I can tell, I'm guessing there actually is no crime being committed here...at least in the US?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    16. Re:same here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CDRs for a telco contain ANI (Originating number) and Billed Number (usually the same) records. Any clown with access to Asterisk and an appropriately relaxed VoIP termination carrier (ie. Everyone) can send a bogus ANI&BN along the wires. This invalidates the use of CDRs for such purposes.

      The only recourse left for telecommunication companies is to live-trap calls and do a back-trace which follows ISDN messages back to an originating point of origin. ISDN messages (or SS7, if the network is new enough) are not usually kept due to their rate significant volume, thus necessitating the call trap being initiated first.

      This means you need to be a repeat victim and have the presence of mind (and a big enough stick, usually) to convince a phone company to begin a trap service.

      Back tracking spoofed CLIDs is not at all easy, which is probably why most authorities are reluctant to put in the considerable time and effort involved to even determine the source of the calls, let alone prosecuting the offenders.

    17. Re:same here by BrowserCapsGuy · · Score: 1

      An old-fashioned answering machine won't work for me because I don't have one. However, I do have a software-based answering system that lets me enter custom greetings based on Caller ID. What I've done is whitelist everyone I want to receive calls from and add a custom greeting for them. Everyone else gets my default greeting which states, "I've received so many calls where the Caller ID is spoofed and the caller tries to defraud me via one method or another that unless you're on my whitelist you'll hear this message and then get hung up on before you can leave me a message." If it turns out the call is from someone I'd actually like to hear from I add them to the whitelist and let them know it's alright to call me. This works well for me because I do not use my phone for most of my voice communications and therefore it's not a hassle or inconvenience for me.

      --
      Alright! I know I'm in there! If I don't come out, I'll have to come in after me!
    18. Re:same here by wgoodman · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've asked, they said it could not be changed.

    19. Re:same here by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 0

      She could file a john doe lawsuit and get the CDRs via subpoena ala RIAA...

      File a lawsuit for what? Did she copyright her phone number?

      You can't just "file a lawsuit," you have to allege some particular violation of civil law.

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    20. Re:same here by Amouth · · Score: 1

      falseifying (sp?) your identity with intent to defraud is illegal - and because these are people scamming and not just joe sixpack with a tinfoil hat then yes what they are doing is illegal as you can easily argue that CallerID info can be considered a way to identitify someone.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    21. Re:same here by CyberVenom · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, I am sure that ANI is what is being spoofed here. (I have received calls from the same group myself.) ANI can be spoofed if the originating carrier allows, which is common practice for high-volume outbound automated calling campaigns. It is usually used legitimately to provide a number via which the called party can call back later if they miss the call or are disconnected.

      (I work for a company which legitimately performs this sort of high-volume outbound calling.)

      One other thing to note - this is actually the jursidiction of the FCC, not the FBI (at least not yet). As soon as you can prove that there is some sort of actual fraud going on beyond just violating FCC rules, then they might get involved.

    22. Re:same here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      harassment.

    23. Re:same here by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "falseifying (sp?) your identity with intent to defraud is illegal - and because these are people scamming and not just joe sixpack with a tinfoil hat then yes what they are doing is illegal as you can easily argue that CallerID info can be considered a way to identitify someone."

      Ok, but what about falsifying your identity that involves NO intent to defraud?

      In that case...spoofing your id wouldn't be illegal, would it?

      I think in your argument above....defrauding someone or intent to defraud someone is the crime...not the spoofing, which might be considered a tool being used, but, spoofing with no fraud I'd guess is not a crime.

      I don't know of any laws that require you to truthfully identify yourself in most actions during the day in the US. I'm not sure about the legality of the secret laws supposing that you are required to do some to the TSA on a airflight, but, that is a different and extreme case. Aside from that I think the only time you are really by law required to identify yourself truthfully, is if an officer requests you do so within the constraints of a crime being investigated?

      I don't think it is against the law for me to go through life identifying myself to all in public as Tyler Durden, and conducting my life. I don't think having an alias is against the law, which I would put forth is synonymous with spoofing a caller ID number.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    24. Re:same here by mrzaph0d · · Score: 1

      I think I remember there's an option buried in the menu system somewhere that lets you change this. But you have to search through the advanced options, and I'm not sure it's even labeled appropriately.

      --
      this is just a placeholder till i send back my real sig from the future.
    25. Re:same here by alienw · · Score: 1

      Which is actually a huge security hole. I can get to a lot of people's voicemail just by spoofing their number on the caller id (which can be done with nearly any VoIP termination provider). At one point, I had my caller ID number on my SIP phone set to my cellphone number; I noticed that when I called my cellphone number from the SIP phone, it dumped me straight into voicemail. No password, nothing. So if you think your voicemail is secure -- it's not.

    26. Re:same here by quetwo · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are two "caller-id" fields that are sent in SS7 (the out-of-band signaling that occurs between telcos) -- the BTN (Bill To Number), and the CPN (Calling Party Number). The BTN refers to the actual carrier, and account number that is placing the call, and the CPN is what is displayed by consumer Caller-ID units.

      Large customers who have direct access to SS7 information over ISDN would be able to pick up the BTN, which would identify, at the very worst, the caller's local exchange carrier.

      The phone companies are not allowed to reveal the BTN to a consumer or police agency without a signed subpoena by a judge with jurisdiction of the crime. The only exception to the rule seems to be the whitehouse, but that is a different matter all together. There are direct FCC violations to reveal that information without the proper paperwork.

      As far as the lady keeping her phone number, that is akin to somebody keeping their credit card number after fraud. Yes, it is the number that she has had for years, and its the number that everybody knows, but in all honesty, the number is black listed now. She hasn't had the number for 50 years, as in the 70's going into the 80's NuStar renumber all the phone numbers from 4,5, and 6 digits to 10 digit numbers.

    27. Re:same here by sysusr · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can't just "file a lawsuit," you have to allege some particular violation of civil law.

      Not in the U.S.

      --
      \x72\x6D\x20\x2D\x72\x66
    28. Re:same here by adamstew · · Score: 3, Informative

      Defamation of character. These people think SHE is calling them. They are pretending to be her by calling "from" her number.

      It's to the point where SHE is getting harassed and getting death threats. I think a judge would allow the discovery.

    29. Re:same here by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      But CDRs from where? To my knowledge, the telco doesn't maintain inbound CDRs or for local calls. It could be that the calls are from her local CO, and therefore would have no CDRs, or my be from anywhere else, and then only the remote CO and LD carrier would have those CDRs, but you have no clue which one it is.

      About the only way to catch this would be to be monitoring calls on a line that receives one of these calls. But you cannot (legally) just monitor all lines to find them.

      Further, there are a number of internet "telco" companies that let you set your CallerID info. In fact, you can even use a web interface at one site to have it call two numbers and join the calls (spoofing the CallerID of each to each other).

      Unfortunately, you'd really have to have the help of a[ll] telco[s]. Which is about as likely to occur as getting someone to tell you who owns an 800#.

    30. Re:same here by Sparr0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Caller ID spoofing comprises a number of TCPA violations, most of which have explicit civil penalties.

    31. Re:same here by KGIII · · Score: 1

      TBH anyone who thinks that voice mail is secure or ever was secure is rather stupid. It isn't as if it is encrypted and/or stored in some giant facility where no one has access to it.

      Then again, over the years I have found that a number of voice messages go missing. Some that I have left and other's have left have just disappeared into thin air. Thinking that voice mail is also reliable is yet another silly thing to do.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    32. Re:same here by KGIII · · Score: 1

      TCPA, I believe, expressly forbids it and provisions penalties for violations.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    33. Re:same here by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      From this part of the TCPA "Solicitors must provide their name, the name of the person or entity on whose behalf the call is being made, and a telephone number or address at which that person or entity may be contacted."

      It appears that they have to give this info upon request, but, I don't see where they have to give it on CallerID accurately?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    34. Re:same here by arminw · · Score: 1

      ...As far as the lady keeping her phone number, that is akin to somebody keeping their credit card number after fraud....

      Almost, but not quite. A good way to keep telemarketers and other undesirable calls at bay, is to only answer known numbers that show up on the caller ID. Everything else gets routed to the answering machine. Most computerized telemarketing systems recognize when an answering machine picks up and don't bother to leave any kind of message. Those that do, can be dealt with quickly by the delete button.

      --
      All theory is gray
    35. Re:same here by arminw · · Score: 1

      ... Frankly, it's about time we had some ability as consumers to deal with this sort of fraud...

      You do have that ability. It is called an answering machine. When a number shows up on caller ID which you do not recognize as a friend's, relative's or business associate's, just don't answer the phone, but let the answering machine take it. Most automated call systems are not programmed to leave a message. For those who do leave messages, a push of a button will delete them. Also, when calls coming in at a time when you do not wish to answer the phone, such as at dinnertime, just ignore the phone. At first it may be hard to ignore a ringing telephone, but after a while you'll get the hang(up) of it.

      --
      All theory is gray
    36. Re:same here by namgge · · Score: 1

      File a lawsuit for what?

      Tort.

      Namgge

    37. Re:same here by eggoeater · · Score: 2, Informative

      It doesn't use Caller ID, it uses ANI, which is not the same thing.
      I'm a call center engineer. Call center agents often use ANI as once point of caller authentication.
      Most calling systems (eg. ACDs and PBXs) can insert any caller ID information with an outbound call, which is usually used to send out the generic 800 number for a company, but unfortunately it sometimes gets set to some poor old ladies home phone number.

    38. Re:same here by PaintyThePirate · · Score: 1

      This used to be a vulnerability with Cingular. I found it out accidently when playing around with my Asterisk box. I called a friend from her own phone number and ended up in voicemail.

      That was a few years ago, though. I think most carriers require PINs by default now.

    39. Re:same here by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 1

      Your correct that they can spoof these numbers by using "stealing" call forwarding feature on the legitimate phone lines from many places. This is like spam bots covering tracks of the bot master where they take over other computer to send out spam in bot master place. However, just like spam bots you can trace these but it does take a large amount of effort between the phone companies since this can transverse several phone companies and countries. Actually I worked many people to search for bomb threat phone calls to my old company, our legal department said we need to get the FBI, FCC, and the phone company. First they got a court order via FCC to get the records and then traced that to several international phone companies which Interpol via the FBI took care of that, then the trace came back to US and FBI took over that part, and after several months tracing we knew which city that person was living in so FBI monitored that person for awhile before they had sufficient evidence to have a case against them an arrest him. All I can say that person had more than just threats via phone on him.
      First try the FCC to see what they can do:
      http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/callerid.html
      Then, if you have the resources, contact an private investigator and lawyer specializing in telemarketing issue to see what they have.
      Local police may have limited resource to handle illegal telemarketing calls but if they have the time they can start the process for you at least that is a start.
      I get these stupid phone calls also and they all start with the line "Your car warranty is expired..." and all of them are all prerecorded messages so I wish that would get these female donkey anal orifice:
      http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/08/19/2229245

    40. Re:same here by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      Oh - I've received (in the past) numerous calls where the telemarketers refuse to identify themselves, the name of their company, etc. This law is violated every single day millions of times. It's not strong enough.

      We need laws that mandate that telcos ENFORCE proper callerID for ALL business phones, or the call is rejected. Penalties for forging need to include mandatory jail time for executives of businesses violating the law including a seizure of all assets.

      If you want compliance, you have to get tough.

      What I did is add a white-list my phone system (asterisk.)

      Any number dialed from inside is automatically added to the white-list. Non-white-listed numbers, non-local numbers, and anonymous are prompted to press 1. Failure to do that in a timeframe sends them to voice mail.

      It has worked VERY well for me. ZERO robo calls get through.

    41. Re:same here by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      No. I want to *99 the call to have it reported as fraud, and have the report acted on. Your solution is to bend over and take it.

    42. Re:same here by psoriac · · Score: 1

      Not if you configure your voicemail access to require the password even when calling from your own number. IIRC you are prompted to set this option when you setup your voicemail the first time after your account is activated.

      This is how I've always configured it even when I was on Sprint - I did not want people checking my voicemail if I ever lost my phone.

      You mean your voicemail will let you in because that's what you told it to do? SHOCKING.

      --
      I browse Slashdot at +3, Funny
    43. Re:same here by psoriac · · Score: 1

      With AT&T and Sprint, not if you configured your voicemail access to require the password even when calling from your own number. I just tested this to make sure and it just kept asking for my password when I pressed only #. IIRC you are prompted to set this option when you setup your voicemail the first time after your account is activated.

      --
      I browse Slashdot at +3, Funny
    44. Re:same here by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Since there is no fraud being committed here as far as I can tell, I'm guessing there actually is no crime being committed here...at least in the US?

      How about Defamation of character? By using her name, they are disparaging her character, as evidenced by the death threats. Her damages are time and trouble fielding the calls, and metal anguish. Fairly clear case once you identify them.

    45. Re:same here by innerweb · · Score: 1

      This is starting to sound like a great time to do a new article on how to set up your own home pbx. lol

      InnerWeb

      --
      Freud might say that Intelligent Design is religion's ID.
    46. Re:same here by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1

      You can't just "file a lawsuit," you have to allege some particular violation of civil law.

      Not in the U.S.

      Right--if she puts the words 'emotional distress', and or 'anguish' into her lawsuit, the case will be hers from day one.

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    47. Re:same here by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1

      File a lawsuit for what?

      Tort.

      Namgge

      Thank you very much. I just wasted several minutes trying to figure out what the f*ck 'namgge' was in relation to law. Then I realized you're one of those people who sign their name without separating it from the rest of the post...

      See--here's how us 'normies' do it:

      -darkpixel

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    48. Re:same here by ciscoguy01 · · Score: 1

      More to the point...is there actually anything ILLEGAL at all about spoofing a caller ID number? I don't know of any laws that require you to give out by any means, the phone number you are calling from.

      Since there is no fraud being committed here as far as I can tell, I'm guessing there actually is no crime being committed here...at least in the US?

      Which is the whole problem. When caller ID was created it was a way for the telcos to make money, a "service" they could sell, which cost nothing since it was all a part of their switching equipment. They made millions selling those services to us.
      But now we find that caller ID is actually insecure, the telcos that created and sold it never took ordinary care to secure it and that anyone can spoof caller ID data, even using a free website caller ID spoofing service.
      And now that some people are depending on caller ID being secure, like the AT&T Cellular voicemail as was mentioned earlier in the thread, it's getting to be a problem.

      The solution of course is to make the telcos responsible for the security and correctness of the data they are sending their customers who pay for their caller ID service, and to have penalties for allowing the sending of data that is not "true". Like $1000 per falsified caller ID incident.

      That's the only solution I can think of. The telcos will either secure the caller ID service lickity split or stop selling it altogether.

      --
      .
    49. Re:same here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most computerized telemarketing systems recognize when an answering machine picks up and don't bother to leave any kind of message.

      Except that in doing so, it can take a while before the answerphone is recognised, and so the answerphone records a blank message. All fine and dandy, except that it means the answerphone then fills up with blank "The other person has cleared" messages meaning anyone who wants to leave a message can't...this HAS happened to me on more than one occasion - I can remotely page my anwerphone, but it's a pain having to sort through all the blank messages remotely.

      Oh, and incidently, the caller ID number is often spoofed on these message (to a non-existant number) - clearly a case of someone SPAMMING my answerphone.

    50. Re:same here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they're happy to lie to you (by spoofing their Caller ID), feel free to lie to them and tell them you don't have a Credit Card (no lie if you don't), but you could send them a cheque so if they could give you the address, you'll pop it into the post for them...

    51. Re:same here by Zwicky · · Score: 1

      I want to *99 the call and have them automatically stabbed in the testicles with a red hot ice pick.

      In our home I'm the one who pays for and has the only connected landline telephone in my room (it is only for the internet and everyone has cellphones for regular use). I've been getting calls for other family members from less-than-honest companies.

      Now I always let the phone go to voicemail and delete the messages afterwards. Batch processing, baby!

      One of these companies especially is a persistent harasser, asking after anther family member. Their messages are approximately 50% pre-recorded ("We have a very some very important information on your account for you...") and 50% live.

      I have answered one of their calls once, some months after they first began calling. I confronted them about it being a marketing call and they tried to assure* me that it wasn't. "I assure you that this isn't a sales call, Sir". * I know that because he used the word 'assure'.

      The insidious thing is that no one in the family has ever had an account with this company; they're just trolling for business, trying to foist a credit card with rates only fit for the mathematically naive, on somebody.

      This is even more insidious because I've personally just sorted out a mountain of debts that the person they are targeting had amassed. She definitely does not need another credit card!

      Anyway, if I have any trouble identifying the callers (who rotate numbers quite often), I've found services like whocalled.us to be very useful.

      Fortunately for me they don't call often enough (just three times per week on average) that it has become a huge deal, but I will be changing my telephone number soon anyway.

      In my opinion too many people treat the telephone as an open and freely accessible door into your home. If you don't know me and I haven't given you my number personally you have no business calling me, period. That's my opinion.

      --
      "Three eyes are better than one" -- Lieutenant Columbo
    52. Re:same here by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      In the immortal words of Deep Throat, "Follow the Money." Insurance company's have names; which companies are benefiting by this? These companies are profiting by indirect use of her property, (her phone number). Unless she has authorized the use of her phone number, the Insurance companies have basically profited by the actions of Agents working for them. Also, if she is not a licensed Insurance Agent, she is partly responsible for the actions of the Agents of the Insurance companies that are profiting from this stunt. Any Lawyer that has about 3 to 5 years experience can have a "field day" with this problem. Of course, the person damaged by this can always make Chocolate Chip Cookies from Elax and give them to the show-offs that are bothering her.

    53. Re:same here by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      I've been joe-jobbed in a slightly different way.

      For a period of several months, I was getting a number of angry calls from strangers, as well as some who wanted to "order more pills". Turns out my number was showing up on people's credit card bills for transactions from some mail-order pill mill.

      At the time, I had my number forwarded to a cell phone in Thailand, where I was working, so in addition to being annoying, these calls came in when I was trying to sleep, and cumulatively cost me a not inconsiderable amount of money.

      I never did manage to figure out who the company was. I asked some of the callers, but this made most of them very suspicious (maybe they were anti-paranoia pills). Nobody seemed to have the original ad that led them to order in the first place, so the only contact information they ever came up with was my own number, read from the Visa bill.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    54. Re:same here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then I realized you're one of those people who sign their name without separating it from the rest of the post

      Umm, he *did* separate it - there's a nice, big double-space between the two lines.

      Maybe you have some user-css that causes it not to display properly in your browser?

    55. Re:same here by kilodelta · · Score: 1

      It's not just at&t, it's Sprint too. That seems to be a common flaw in the cell market.

  2. Vigilante Justice ala Slashdot Anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Give us what you know about the scammer, though if you don't want to include the victimized phone number we can understand. Then just let Slashdot work its magic. The Scammers will be on their knees begging in no time...

    1. Re:Vigilante Justice ala Slashdot Anyone? by mikael · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just post their website here - the sheer curiosity of a million slashdotters will flatten their servers faster than a horde of Mongol warriors on horseback.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:Vigilante Justice ala Slashdot Anyone? by Lookin4Trouble · · Score: 4, Informative
    3. Re:Vigilante Justice ala Slashdot Anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.digitcom.net/

      You're welcome.

    4. Re:Vigilante Justice ala Slashdot Anyone? by flyingfsck · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here they are: http://www.digitcom.net/

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    5. Re:Vigilante Justice ala Slashdot Anyone? by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      Wow, their site is a little out of date... they have information on there about using their services if you've got a Win95/98 or NT4 box... The site's design in general is like a step back into the late 90's.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    6. Re:Vigilante Justice ala Slashdot Anyone? by rcpitt · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Brings to mind a somewhat similar "Vigilante Justice" story from the past. Irnalee Stohrs' phone number was inadvertently printed as the contact number on a bunch of summons from the local Juvenile court - only after people from all over the country started phoning the court would they (the court) do something about this flood of calls the poor lady was getting. Read the story from Comp.Dcom.Telecom Usenet group 1990 postings Maybe the "proper authorities" need something like this to open their eyes too.

      --
      Been there, done that, paid for the T-shirt
      and didn't get it
    7. Re:Vigilante Justice ala Slashdot Anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      while [ true ]; do
            wget --limit-rate=$1 http://www.digitcom.net/
      done

    8. Re:Vigilante Justice ala Slashdot Anyone? by Loether · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How do we know this is the company and not just someone who pissed off "Lookin4Trouble"? That's the problem with vigilante Justice. Vigilante's don't always check the facts, neither do slashdot editors for that matter.

      --
      TODO create witty sig.
    9. Re:Vigilante Justice ala Slashdot Anyone? by Lookin4Trouble · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Call and ask to speak to Herman Moore (the head of customer relations). Let him know that you received an unsolicited call regarding vehicle warranties, and that you'd like the calls to stop. He'll give you the (866) "opt-out" number that digitcom uses.

      E

    10. Re:Vigilante Justice ala Slashdot Anyone? by Nar+Matteru · · Score: 1

      Cops lawyers and judges don't always check the facts either.

    11. Re:Vigilante Justice ala Slashdot Anyone? by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, the fact that you have YET to provide any proof, after quite a few requests - clearly you don't care if you are correct. What an ass. Post your own story - stop trying to hijack this one.

    12. Re:Vigilante Justice ala Slashdot Anyone? by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Sorta makes you wonder what box is hosting that don't it?

      Like, maybe if it has been patched or not... or something.

      [winkwink]

    13. Re:Vigilante Justice ala Slashdot Anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm this website is pingable
      anyone want to put on a black hat?

    14. Re:Vigilante Justice ala Slashdot Anyone? by Tired+and+Emotional · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow - Mongol hordes on Horseback clearly get way better mobile connectivity than I ever do.

      --
      Squirrel!
    15. Re:Vigilante Justice ala Slashdot Anyone? by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      WTF? These assholes have been calling my numbers that are on the federal do not call list. What makes you think they actively use an internal do not call list, or better put... what makes you think they give a flying fuck? Hrm?

    16. Re:Vigilante Justice ala Slashdot Anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I like how this is the second response you have given and no one has yet noticed.

      http://www.digitcom.net/ [digitcom.net]

      is responsible.

    17. Re:Vigilante Justice ala Slashdot Anyone? by calmofthestorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Slashdot is not your personal army.

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    18. Re:Vigilante Justice ala Slashdot Anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tits or GTFO!

    19. Re:Vigilante Justice ala Slashdot Anyone? by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      you mean "on motorcycles".

      http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/3jWUpMLwifM/article.pl

      But you wont be able to recognize them anymore.

      --
      bickerdyke
    20. Re:Vigilante Justice ala Slashdot Anyone? by clem · · Score: 1

      What exactly are we going to do? Rickroll them into submission?

      --
      Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
    21. Re:Vigilante Justice ala Slashdot Anyone? by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 1

      So glad to see your response to my question/concern was to mark me as your foe. You are a very "special" person there, L4T. Sometimes, it's better to clear an issue up instead of going on a Jihad. But then again, given your history so far - not much hope, is there?

    22. Re:Vigilante Justice ala Slashdot Anyone? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Stay in your rank, soldier, and no backtalk!

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    23. Re:Vigilante Justice ala Slashdot Anyone? by bendodge · · Score: 1

      If you collapse Lookin4Trouble's post, you'll see that several other members have posted the same site. Of course, they could be duplicates.

      --
      The government can't save you.
  3. Ouch by Aphoxema · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well good grief, the two exact entities who are supposed to take care of this kind of thing refuse, then just what is going on in this country?

    I'd just call them both a few more times to see if there's anywhere to get, it's very clear laws have been broken.

    --
    "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    1. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      This country is going bankrupt. :) Except you won't hear that from our pres, because that would cause Americans to become concerned. It's better for us little people to pretend we don't know what's going on so we can live our little lives without having to face the truth.

    2. Re:Ouch by Aphoxema · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yet I strangely doubt that either the FBI or their telephone company has orders to ignore little old ladies in distress with something very much in their influence.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    3. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless they don't have the money to deal with this warranty scam case, or are otherwise still investigating it and still haven't gotten any leads. :) I'm not saying that is the case, but it may very well be.

      This government has been aiding and abetting scams in the financial industry for so long that I doubt they care about snubbing a petty warranty scam.

      vc: million

    4. Re:Ouch by pla · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well good grief, the two exact entities who are supposed to take care of this kind of thing refuse, then just what is going on in this country?

      "Business as usual".

      Extended warranty telemarketers, scum of the Earth or not, help keep the economy flowing; little old ladies do not. Extended warranty telemarketers pay HUGE monthly phone bills; little old ladies do not.

      The phone company cares about one thing only - Making as much money any way they can. Dealing with complaints from small potatoes takes money, and won't make them any more in return.

      The FBI also cares about one thing only - protecting corporate interests. They only deign to deal with non-property crimes like murder and rape because those have the potential to lower property values and reduce commerce (and thus, tax revenue) in the area. If you rob a bank and get away with $50, they'll hunt you to the ends of the Earth, because the sheep might get spooked; If you can't plug in your phone because it never stops ringing with either telemarketers or (in this case) people pissed at telemarketers who've faked their ID, well, who cares except you?

    5. Re:Ouch by idontgno · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, they don't have orders to ignore little old ladies. They have orders to do so many other things that they just don't have time for little old ladies, unless they're gonna call overseas and talk to suspicious furners.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    6. Re:Ouch by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'd just call them both a few more times to see if there's anywhere to get, it's very clear laws have been broken.

      When calling them, make sure to tell them you're running for vice president. That way, the FBI will have the perps in custody and placed under felony indictments within a week.

    7. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the two exact entities who are supposed to take care of this kind of thing refuse, then just what is going on in this country?

      Yeah, that's the worst problem we face in America today.

    8. Re:Ouch by JTorres176 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've worked accounts receivable before. If you call a company and don't like the answer you get, be polite, say thank you, then hang up. Call back immediately and 9 times out of 10, you get a different person. It's called "shopping", and people do it with doctors, salesmen, and even government offices. Call back until you get the answer you want or someone who's willing to help.

      --
      Evil Walrus >83=
    9. Re:Ouch by Toll_Free · · Score: 1

      Which laws?

      I've seen equipment and software on the internet to do just such thing thing, but I never researched it far enough to see if it was legal or not.

      Seriously, what caller ID law is there?

      --Toll_Free

    10. Re:Ouch by Xebikr · · Score: 1

      Umm... What exactly is the phone company supposed to do about it? Do they have some kind of special wiring that can detect whether it's her grandkids calling or an angry scam victim? Can they reach their fingers through the lines and stop the scammers from spoofing the old lady's phone number even through the call probably doesn't originate or even necessarily terminate on their lines? Do you really think they have that kind of filtering power? And the FBI. What do they have to go on? They know that someone, somewhere is spoofing her phone number. I'm not sure that is even illegal. So what basis do they have to justify the expense of an investigation?

      I've had my email address used by spammers as their return address. I got a lot of angry emails for a while. It sucks. Bad people do bad things and innocent people get hurt. Sometimes you can stop them, sometimes you just have to do your best to shield yourself from the effects. I stopped using that email address. She should change her phone number.

    11. Re:Ouch by mo · · Score: 1

      It's not that her phone company refused, it's that they can't do anything about it. A local phone carrier can't find out who's using that caller-id if the call is made from some other exchange. Phone companies don't do egress filtering of caller-id, so there's nothing stopping you from spoofing your caller-id as a New York number from your phone in California. When the old lady in New York calls her local phone carrier, there's nothing they can do to help her.

    12. Re:Ouch by ionix5891 · · Score: 4, Funny

      the old lady should say someone called "Osama B" is spoofing her phone

      she will get FBI attention in no time

    13. Re:Ouch by sustik · · Score: 1

      Hmm. We may see some advantage emerging from internet telephony: ssh based authentication would take care of this.

      Now why phone companies do not have authentication methods developed I do not know. Maybe because they have not done anything novel for a while? And note that wireless companies are not much better. New fancy phones are rolled out, but the single feature I am looking for is not a camera, music player, but the capability to *screen* my calls so that I could say that from 9pm till 9am only a list of numbers (family + close friends) could ring my phone. Callers with blocked id-s should never be able to ring my phone, etc.

    14. Re:Ouch by Toll_Free · · Score: 1

      My question was serious.

      Is it a case of fraud? Who are you defrauding? Fraud needs to have basic premises met before you can throw it at someone.

      I don't think lying is really fraud. I'm not in the legal profession, so I dunno for sure.... Hence the question.

      --Toll_Free

    15. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not that her phone company refused, it's that they can't do anything about it.

      How convenient. Muahaha!

    16. Re:Ouch by JCSoRocks · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You could fix the "who cares" part by forwarding calls to her number to the FBI or your local phone company.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    17. Re:Ouch by Toll_Free · · Score: 1

      I would think it would fall more under the Hacking laws of a telcosystem.

      Similiar to boxing in the past.

      --Toll_Free

    18. Re:Ouch by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      If I recall correctly, there are two separate caller ID subsystems. One is relatively easy to spoof "It's a feature not a bug" and provides the user-visible telephone number, one is MUCH harder to spoof but usually not user-visible at either end. The latter (in addition to other data related to billing and such) allows the phone company to track the spoofer.

      The only way that the spoofers could have an incomplete paper trail that doesn't allow them to be tracked down would be if they are stealing phone service, in which case the phone company would be VERY interested in hunting them down.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    19. Re:Ouch by mabhatter654 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If she has received threats then a crime has definitely been committed. Perhaps the way to deal with it is not as a spoofed phone, but why are people she doesn't know making threats. Those people should be easy to track... let them explain to the telco and feds why they said that thing to a little old lady.

    20. Re:Ouch by Viraptor · · Score: 1

      Do they have some kind of special wiring that can detect whether it's her grandkids calling or an angry scam victim?

      Actually, they know which provider sent in the call. So they can point at the original company that allows spoofing.

      Can they reach their fingers through the lines and stop the scammers from spoofing the old lady's phone number even through the call probably doesn't originate or even necessarily terminate on their lines?

      I'm not sure which company regulates telecomunication laws in US, but I guess they have the authority to force it on PSTN and they *are* interested.

      And the FBI. What do they have to go on? They know that someone, somewhere is spoofing her phone number. I'm not sure that is even illegal. So what basis do they have to justify the expense of an investigation?

      I guess they will be interested if someone can spoof any number. Otherwise, you can call anyone passing yourself as a local FBI worker ("you can compare my caller id with your phonebook, I'm an FBI agent")

      I've had my email address used by spammers as their return address.

      Only clueless people will respond to a spammer - there is no defence here. But if someone blames you, you can easily prove you're right by email headers.

      She should change her phone number.

      Will you sponsor her new line, send notifications to all her friends&family and spend time correcting contact details in the bank, insurance company, etc.?

    21. Re:Ouch by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Lying is not fraud. Fraud implies a transaction under false pretenses. If no transaction takes place, there is no fraud. Fraud requires lying, but lying does not imply fraud. Otherwise prank calling would be fraud.

    22. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

    23. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *if* they are refusing to deal with this ask for this in writing.

      Once received take it to a lawyer for assessment.

      Then go media.

    24. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANAL, but given that the extended warranty telemarketers "pay HUGE monthly phone bills," a civil lawsuit against the telemarketers would certainly have legs. If their actions have indeed resulted in death threats, there's a clear case of "mental distress," not to mention potentially HUGE financial compensation, as well as possible class action status.

    25. Re:Ouch by mosinu · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You could fix the "who cares" part by forwarding calls to her number to the FBI or your local phone company.

      Careful with that... I got my hand slapped by the FBI once because they wouldn't do anything so I redirected all the traffic I was complaining about to them. Took them 2 weeks but they had me hauled before a Federal Judge to tell me to stop. The judge vacated the charges on my promise to stop redirecting traffic.

    26. Re:Ouch by Khyber · · Score: 1

      No, nowdays they'll just get you on Federal wire fraud charges, which is the new reincarnation of the old phreaking laws from back in the 70s and 80s.

      Also, since this lady's number is being falsely used, it could somewhat count as slander or defamation of character, potentially even identity theft since it's her name and phone number showing up in everyone's caller ID.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    27. Re:Ouch by mosinu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If she has received threats then a crime has definitely been committed. Perhaps the way to deal with it is not as a spoofed phone, but why are people she doesn't know making threats. Those people should be easy to track... let them explain to the telco and feds why they said that thing to a little old lady.

      Not a bad idea, she should complain to the FCC who governs communication anyhow. Not the FBI.

    28. Re:Ouch by JoelG · · Score: 3, Informative

      You are thinking about the CCS7 switching protocol in comparison to the Calling Name and Number system.

      CCS7 is the protocol that's used to send originating/terminating phone number information across the telephone system in order to help route calls. The Calling Name and Number system is used to send phone number/customer name information to a telephone set. CCS7 cannot be lied to, as it's populated by the telephone company on a per call basic. The Calling Name and Number system can be lied to, as in certain cases (for instance, a telemarketer with a PRI) it's actually the CUSTOMER that provides the information.

      --
      Quandary in the Making
    29. Re:Ouch by Ziest · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think you are on to something there. The phone company in this country (US) has the unique problem of they have sold a phone to everyone who wants one. I read somewhere that some where between 98% and 99% of this country has a phone. How the phone company expands profits is by selling new services like call waiting and voice mail. Here is a new service that I would pay good money for; A phone company provided list of everyone who called my number in say the last month and I could take any number on that list, dial it, and get the person who called me. No spoofed numbers. They have this information, it's in the billing system.

      --
      Another day closer to redwood heaven
    30. Re:Ouch by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      Great point.

      Caling someone and leaving a threat is a crime, no?

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    31. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best option: Call the folks that SHOULD care and act like THEIR number was used for SPAM. Be irate. Demand to speak with their marketing department. Throw lawsuit threats around. :D

      That will perk up their interest.

    32. Re:Ouch by JoelG · · Score: 1

      Nortel's DMS family of telephone switches has part of what you're talking about. SCA (Selective Call Acceptance) allows you to specify a list of phone numbers you ACCEPT calls from, but it has no way to specify time of day.

      This brings up an important point though. You may assume lack of a feature is due to the ineptitude or carelessness of your telephone company, but the exact opposite is usually the case.

      There are very few telephone companies with the ability to dictate to their equipment vendors what type of technologies they would like to have. 9 times out of 10 it is the equipment vendor that dictates to the telephone company what features are available for them to use.

      So some nice feature, that the telephone company would love to supply you with is simply not available on the market, and most telephone companies don't have the clout to force the vendors to offer it. The telephone companies that are large enough to carry this type of clout are the ones that don't care, and usually force the market's feature set to that which is currently available.

      --
      Quandary in the Making
    33. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no laws that govern this. It is, sadly, not illegal (yet - they are working on it). I worked for Verizon for 10 1/2 years and this became a really big issue the last year or year 1/2 that I worked for them. There wasn't much we could do to help customers whose numbers had been spoofed, but there was one incident in Maine/NH/VT area that happened to so many people and got such publicity that VZ put out a press release explaining it. I believe the police were involved in that, also, because it was scammers calling people & not actual telemarketers. So, the laws that would be broken in this case have to do with the scam & not the caller ID spoofing.

    34. Re:Ouch by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Funny

      I skipped the middleman and now answer "PRIVATE NUMBER" and obviously-forged numbers a little differently. Example:

      Me: Nebraska Attorney General John Bruning's office, how may I help you?
      Scammer: Ummm, would you... like to cut your credit card interest rates?
      Me: If you hang up, I will arrest you. What number are you calling from?
      Scammed: [scared expletive deleted] [dial tone]

      OK, so I lied. I don't think they're going to file a complaint about it.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    35. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Extended warranty telemarketers, scum of the Earth or not, help keep the economy flowing;

      Interestingly, the "Extended Warranty" schemes sound just like a Credit Default Swap, which is what caused the global credit crisis.

      Basically, people were buying insurance (cf. warranty) on bonds they didn't own, then selling insurance on the same bond. If one were to buy insurance at a premium of, say, 2% of the bond's value, and then sell insurance at, say 4% of the value, one would basically be raking in 2% of the bond's value *for free*.
      This all works out great until all the bonds tank at once and nobody can make good on the insurance policies they were selling.

      That's exactly what happened when the housing market imploded. Since the housing market was considered one of the safest bets around, banks were using it to back tons of bonds. So, down they went like dominoes: first the housing market, then the bonds, then the insuring banks, then everything else.

    36. Re:Ouch by IP_Troll · · Score: 5, Informative

      Wrong, neither of those entities are supposed to take care of this king of thing.

      The correct agencies are the FCC and the FTC.

      Here is an article about Caller ID fraud that gives the contact name and number for the FTC investigator in charge of this kind of thing.
      http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2006/05/scorpio.shtm

      It is from 2006, so the hierarchy may have changed, but it will send you to the right office. It the number doesn't work call - 1-877-FTC-HELP

    37. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the problems originated overseas, the FBI has zero jurisdiction to do anything about them, just as they have no jurisdiction to do anything about spam originating from outside the US.

    38. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess my wife & I must account for the last 2% of the population that doesn't have a cell phone, then!

      (And I'll finally register when I get home from work tonight since I cannot access either of my email accounts from work).

    39. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Here's an idea. Let's vote for more tax cuts for everyone and still expect the government do everything exactly how we want it, when we want it, and with less money to do it.
      It's a lot like the Wal-Mart mentality. Give us everything super cheap. Who cares if it's bass ackwards. At least we didn't have to pay a lot for it.
      How do you expect the FBI or any other gov't agencies to function properly if we don't fund them properly.
      </Soapbox>

    40. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She should contact her lawmakers.

    41. Re:Ouch by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "OK, so I lied. I don't think they're going to file a complaint about it."

      I would have to guess that is it perfectly legal to answer your own phone any way that you wish? I don't know of any laws that say you have to properly identify yourself on your own phone....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    42. Re:Ouch by JerryLove · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, it's not a crime to lie; but it is a crime (a felony actually) to impersonate a law enforcement agent.

    43. Re:Ouch by Xebikr · · Score: 1

      Either way her phone company won't be able to do more than identify the angry people calling her, not the spoofer. Example: She is in New York(Verizon), the spoofer is in Idaho(Qwest), and he is trying to scam residents of Georgia(Bellsouth). How is Verizon going to id a call placed on Qwest's lines and terminating on Bellsouth's? She is not receiving the spoofed calls. She is getting calls from people who are angry at the spoofer. Her phone company can do nothing (except change her number).

      Now the customer on Bellsouth's network (the person who actually received the spoofer's call) can probably request a call trace (*57 in most area's iirc), and maybe some of them do. But that helps her not at all.

    44. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I skipped the middleman and now answer "PRIVATE NUMBER" and obviously-forged numbers a little differently. Example:

      Me: Nebraska Attorney General John Bruning's office, how may I help you?

        Scammer: Ummm, would you... like to cut your credit card interest rates?

        Me: If you hang up, I will arrest you. What number are you calling from?

        Scammed: [scared expletive deleted] [dial tone]

      OK, so I lied. I don't think they're going to file a complaint about it.

      You could also do like this one guy and pretend they are calling a murder scene =) (google it)

    45. Re:Ouch by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      Technically, he wouldn't be impersonating a law enforcement agent - only being an answering service for said agent. Yes, that's a mighty fine line, but it could hold up in court.

    46. Re:Ouch by Xebikr · · Score: 1

      I think a lot of the confusion here is that the little old lady in the summary is not the one that is receiving the scam calls. She is receiving calls from people the scammer made angry. Her phone company can ID those people, but that won't help her at all. The FBI already knows that caller ID info can be faked. I'm sure they would be very interested in someone impersonating an FBI agent (which is illegal), but that is not what is happening. Spoofing caller ID is not illegal.

    47. Re:Ouch by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "No, it's not a crime to lie; but it is a crime (a felony actually) to impersonate a law enforcement agent."

      What about impersonating a law enforcement agent's 'office'?

      And really...is answering an unsolicited phone call, in that manner impersonation really? When I think of impersonating an officer, I think more like physically dressing up and/or presenting fake credentials, or having fake lights on your car. I don't think answering an unsolicited call in that manner would really qualify as impersonating a law enforcement agent.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    48. Re:Ouch by cduffy · · Score: 1

      The Calling Name and Number system can be lied to, as in certain cases (for instance, a telemarketer with a PRI) it's actually the CUSTOMER that provides the information.

      Responsible telcos, however, will do some validation -- when I ran the phone system for my last employer, our upstream (Time Warner Telecom) validated outgoing caller ID on our PRI, and blanked it if it didn't match one of the blocks we owned.

    49. Re:Ouch by cduffy · · Score: 1

      New fancy phones are rolled out, but the single feature I am looking for is not a camera, music player, but the capability to *screen* my calls so that I could say that from 9pm till 9am only a list of numbers (family + close friends) could ring my phone. Callers with blocked id-s should never be able to ring my phone, etc.

      I'm in the middle of building a Gumstix-based Asterisk box to do just this for my home phone without needing to have a system constantly on. If you don't mind buying your own parts (basically, a netstix 400xm-cf and a Linksys SPA-3000), I'd be happy to publish the image once I've got something I'm happy with. It manages telemarketers and unknown callers appropriately, sorts calls based on who they're for (distinctive ring + individual voicemail boxes + voicemail-to-email; voicemail is stored on a CF card), and if I can get enough performance I'm planning on trying to get iaxmodem working for fax handling. (As there's no FPU, and SpanDSP isn't converted to all-integer yet, that's going to be a stretch).

      It'll be interesting to see how much work similar functionality (less the faxing, of course) is to build into an Android-based cellphone.

    50. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Here's an idea. Use the taxes you have for meaningful things, like enforcing laws, and not million dollar dinner parties, resort trips for elected officials, $60,000 lightbulbs, jobs to the highest bidder, etc.

      There is never a good reason to raise taxes. There is always a good reason for more oversight in government spending.

    51. Re:Ouch by JoelG · · Score: 1

      They would've needed additional hardware to do this verification as a standard CLASS 5 switch does not have this capability. You're talking about an additional piece of hardware that would have to interface between the customer's equipment and the provided PRI.

      I must admit, I'm amazed there is a Telco that would do this, though I do admit it is possible. Doing this would be akin to putting a deep packet inspection sniffer/rejector in between your customer's internet connections and every major internet router in your network.

      --
      Quandary in the Making
    52. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep in mind, many of these spoofed calls originate outside the USA, so who is supposed to handle that?

    53. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for a small telco. We can restrict outbound numbers signaled on a PRI to JUST those assigned to the PRI. No additional hardware required.

      We control calling name and do not take what the customer signals on the PRI. Sure, it's a little more work for us to manage but this helps ensure our customers play nice.

    54. Re:Ouch by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Then answer "(scientology|riaa|mpaa|maffia) legal department".....

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    55. Re:Ouch by quetwo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The phone company is legally bound NOT to reveal the BTN information without a court order. This has nothing to do with corporate greed or anything of the like, it's the LAW.

      Find a judge who will sign the damned paperwork. You'll get your information within minutes.

    56. Re:Ouch by JackHoffman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mr. Mabe is no longer with us...

      Tom Mabe has filled several CDs with his "Revenge on the Telemarketers".

    57. Re:Ouch by quetwo · · Score: 1

      There are two "caller-id" fields in SS7... BTN (Bill-to number) and CPN (Calling Party Number). CPN is delivered to consumers via Caller-ID and the BTN is used with the phone company to compensate each other for termination charges.

      CPN can be declared by the end customer, as long as the telco allows it, the BTN is tied to a physical account number at the LEC. It can't be spoofed because it is completely out of band.

    58. Re:Ouch by quetwo · · Score: 1

      This is not always the case. In AT&T world, as long as you sign a waiver, they will pass through whatever number you want. If you leave the CPN blank, it usually inserts our billing number. For a while I was accidently sending 5 digits to MCBI for a block of numbers we owned instead of the 10 digit. People's caller-ids only had the 5 digit.

    59. Re:Ouch by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      She is receiving calls from people the scammer made angry. Her phone company can ID those people, but that won't help her at all.

      Stopping those blockheads isn't any help to her?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    60. Re:Ouch by Cramer · · Score: 3, Informative

      SS7 can be spoofed, too. It's just a lot more work and needs access very few people have. No telco I've ever worked at, with, or ever walked through would even know someone had set something like this up. (they don't expect it, nor look for it.)

      PRI's use DNIS and ANI. They are not caller-id. Most phone companies ignore the information sent to them from a customer's PRI; the switch fills the origin of the call based on the origin of the call. Caller-id spoofing is rather easy as it's just a short burst of ancient modem tones (1200 baud) between rings. The real problem is dumb callerid hardware that will listen to any broadcast and not the one between first and second ring (the one sent by the telco equipment.)

    61. Re:Ouch by Xebikr · · Score: 1

      Stopping those blockheads isn't any help to her?

      Yeah, not really. She can't stop them from calling her the first time. The most she could do is stop the blockheads from calling her repeatedly. There is no way to preemptively block the morons who call her thinking she's the scammer. Those guys are going to usually going to call her once and then never again, and there will always be a fresh crop of idiots to call her as long as the spoofer is using her phone number.

    62. Re:Ouch by Toll_Free · · Score: 1

      That's what I had thought. In researching it (when I had people calling me from spoofed numbers), it appeared VERY easy to do from ISDN or PRI type lines, so I wondered how long until legislation was introduced to actually deal with it.

      Thanks for the input.

      --Toll_Free

    63. Re:Ouch by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      But they are selling a service. There are hundreds of transactions here. This is obviously FRAUD.

    64. Re:Ouch by Racemaniac · · Score: 1

      next time also spoof your number, see if they bother to trace it, and then demand they do the same for whoever harasses you :D

    65. Re:Ouch by Naturalis+Philosopho · · Score: 1

      Telcos and businesses begin to care only when people begin to opt-out of a system. I don't have a landline. Haven't for over 6 years now. Now no one, legitimate or not, can reach me to make a phone sale. If I was a telco, I'd care about that if enough people chose to opt-out in that way. If I was a legitimate business I'd care a lot if I wasn't able to contact people I was already doing business with to increase sales (businesses can contact current customer's land-lines to up-sell even if the line is on a do-not-call list, they can't call cell phones for any selling). If the system doesn't work, don't use it anymore.

    66. Re:Ouch by lumenistan · · Score: 1

      cduffy - I'd also be interested in how this turns out. Please post back with your results.

    67. Re:Ouch by cduffy · · Score: 1

      I'm not likely to remember to come back here and post. I don't hide my email address, though; feel free to drop a line and ask some time!

    68. Re:Ouch by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      If i could I would give you +5 karma

    69. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if the FBI "can't" do anything about it, [it is possible to still trace the phone call even when using a spoof card or it would be illegal to use them; it just has to be active on the line to be traced, or go through the phone company which is required by law to keep records] When the FBI won't help, they are not doing their jobs. She's be given death threats, she needs protection and they are doing nothing. its grounds for her to sue the fbi for not acting. (some one could use a reverse lookup of the phone number, and find her house, and blow it up) Isn't this a kind of identidy theft? (since the spoof is not a joke, they are stealing her identidy to scam people for money) Sounds like FBI should step in and get to work.

    70. Re:Ouch by ps2os2 · · Score: 1

      The form I filled out (many times no less) is at www.ftc.gov (follow the instructions) and they do have an entry on the form for spoofed callerid's. It looks like (to me) its an FTC issue. Sometimes the FTC actually does act and you do get snail mail updates. But so far no final word:(

    71. Re:Ouch by Chuk · · Score: 1

      I usually hear that called "rep surfing".

      --
      chuk
    72. Re:Ouch by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      And there's no way at all those blockeheads could be, ummm, persuaded to help in catching the scammer? I for one wouldn't like to face a jury for threatening to kill a little old lady.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  4. News Media by topham · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bring the news media in on it, somebody a little more mainstream than Slashdot.

    Then start making threats, and if the phonecalls are inter-state commerce it is a federal issue. Back them up against a wall and force them to act.

    1. Re:News Media by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Contacting the media is definitely the best strategy: not only is this newsworthy, it should shame several agencies into action.

    2. Re:News Media by BrokenHalo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Contacting the media is definitely the best strategy: not only is this newsworthy, it should shame several agencies into action.

      Even better if you turn up in person at the agencies and stick to your guns enough to get the complaint referred to some sort of managerial level, then make sure you get the name of the person you spoke to.

      If you quote this person by name in your report to the media, it sends a clear signal that someone is going to need to cover his ass. At that point, the excreta should make contact with the impeller.

    3. Re:News Media by evanbd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You won't get national coverage, but you don't need it either. This is easily worthy of a few minute segment on the local news -- which ought to be sufficient to shame somebody into taking you more seriously. The phone company rep really won't want to go on camera saying "sorry, they're abusing the phone system, and we won't help."

    4. Re:News Media by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 3, Informative

      The idea of contacting the news media is a good idea. But first she should contact the person who represents her district in the U.S. Congress and the person who represents her district in the State legislature. Many times these individuals are happy to go to bat for someone like this little old lady. There is a federal law against spoofing caller id.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    5. Re:News Media by fm6 · · Score: 1

      So fine, you get 3 minutes on CNN. So you get a lot of pressure to Do Something. But do what? As far as I know, there's no way to figure out who's making a spoofed call. All you'll get is more Qumiby's Bear Patrol theater. Tell the lady to change her phone number. It's not fair that she should have to, but so what?

    6. Re:News Media by residieu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "We don't care. We don't have to. We're the Phone Company"

    7. Re:News Media by nizo · · Score: 1

      I'm amazed no one has come up with the obvious solution: blackmail. When people leave threatening messages, simply call back and demand that they send a few hundred dollars or you are turning their asses in to the police.

    8. Re:News Media by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      This seems risky, actually. By publishing the matter even further, won't this invite droves of Anonymous? In order to make the publicity useful, you're going to have to make it easy for people to know what phone number you're talking about.

    9. Re:News Media by sustik · · Score: 1

      > But do what?

      Develop a system where caller id spoofing is not possible. (See RSA based authentication.)

    10. Re:News Media by TUOggy · · Score: 1

      There are logs which contain phone records just like there are logs that follow packets of info on the net. Thats how they know you made W call from X location to Y number at Z Location and the call had a #:## duration. There are ways =)

    11. Re:News Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately the only real solution now is to get a new number. Because you need to get her phone number out there proving she isn't making the calls. (Phone records could work nicely for calls out.) But once that is done her number will be everywhere, and like 867-5309... it might not be a number she wants.

      But if she does keep the number, maybe put up a website that reflects the info with any news coverage so it is top return on google for that number, and then reference that site on the answering machine. "If you are calling about a car warrenty phone call, the call did not origionate from this number but this number was spoofed on the caller id. More info can be found at www...... If you are trying to reach ______ please leave a message."

      Anyway, good luck.

    12. Re:News Media by fm6 · · Score: 1

      We're talking about helping an old lady, not implementing a change that would require every phone in the country to be replaced (good luck with that).

    13. Re:News Media by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and the logs can be spoofed. See above.

    14. Re:News Media by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      Caller ID can be spoofed, but the actual telco call logs? That's what they base their billing on, so I find it highly unlikely they'd let people get away with faking if it cost them money.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    15. Re:News Media by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Informative

      No they can't. CallerID is spoofable. ANI is not.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    16. Re:News Media by cencithomas · · Score: 1

      Back them [the feds] up against a wall and force them to act.

      Yeeaahhh, you let me know how that works out for you.

      --
      ...'tis easier to blame than to improve.
    17. Re:News Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes, but you need to add some scare-spin to it. "Pedophiles could spoof your kids' friend's phone number!"

    18. Re:News Media by TheSeventh · · Score: 1

      I think they could find it pretty quickly if they wanted to, or were motivated enough to look.

      If someone were to make bomb threats or death threats against the government, congress, white house, etc. then I think the FBI and Secret Service could find them pretty quickly, don't you?

      I'm sorry, but I don't buy the line that with all the technology and spying the phone companies are doing, that they can't find these people within a matter of minutes.

      I would call the following agencies, in this order, write down everything, and then if you get nowhere, call up ALL of the local news stations:

      Complain to the phone company.
      Complain to the FBI.
      Complain to the FTC.
      Complain to your Congressman.
      Complain to your Senator.
      Ask all of them, if they refuse to help, who you should call. If you get nowhere, or think any of them are dragging their feet, contact the news stations.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid, it doesn't mean that they're not out to get you.
    19. Re:News Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or even better:

      "Spoofing caller ID numbers contributes to Global Warming"

    20. Re:News Media by fm6 · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but I don't buy the line that with all the technology and spying the phone companies are doing, that they can't find these people within a matter of minutes.

      So why is it that caller ID spoofing services are so easy to get? I just did a Google search, and there were 10 different adword links to spoofing providers.

      Oops. Just noticed that the banner ad that's at the top of my Slashdot page is for something called SpoofCard!

      You're right to be outraged. But your outrage is obviously not news.

    21. Re:News Media by againjj · · Score: 1

      They both are. Google for "spoof ani". Apparently the easiest way to do it is with a VoIP account.

    22. Re:News Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "turn up in person at the agencies and stick to your guns enough to get the complaint referred"

      NOTE: He does NOT mean that literally

    23. Re:News Media by gbinder69 · · Score: 1

      Sad to have to say, but you make a good suggestion. In this sense the media is acting as an NGO (Non-Governmental Organization), and they have decided to "take up the cause" where government won't or can't act. Of course, they do it for ratings, but there's a lot to be said for negative publicity as a motivator. Here's another thought - contact AARP. They work as ombudsmen in helping out those over 50.

  5. Revenge by thetagger · · Score: 1

    The nice old lady should learn how to be a ninja and vow to take revenge upon those who have wrong her.

    1. Re:Revenge by Albert+Sandberg · · Score: 5, Funny

      .. or she could hire - the A-TEAM!

    2. Re:Revenge by eclectus · · Score: 4, Funny

      if she can find them.

      --
      This signature is a waste of 42 characters
    3. Re:Revenge by xaositects · · Score: 4, Funny

      "I pity the fool who scam ol' ladies, pretendin' t'be ol' ladies. Murdock! Git off the phone, fool!"

    4. Re:Revenge by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      .. or she could hire - the A-TEAM!

      Yes, I could just see an episode where they put a phone routing system up on a block and tackle. You would need a geeky Hannibal to go "I love it when a system comes together!"

    5. Re:Revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .. or she could hire - the A-TEAM!

      if she can find them.

      They went out of business a long time ago. I hear there is a guy in Miami that's just as good.

    6. Re:Revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the Equalizer.

  6. Election Time by jaredmauch · · Score: 5, Informative

    Call local elected reps (state & federal) saying that you're unable to get anyone to deal with the issue. Call the FBI in DC as well. If she's getting interstate death threats, that's illegal and the FBI can call the people back. I've had good luck with my local FBI office (Ann Arbor) when I received an interstate death threat.

    1. Re:Election Time by JerkBoB · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've had good luck with my local FBI office (Ann Arbor) when I received an interstate death threat.

      ...

      Do you get a lot of those?

      --
      A host is a host from coast to coast...
      Unless it's down, or slow, or fails to POST!
    2. Re:Election Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If she's getting interstate death threats, that's illegal

      Because any other type of death threats are ok and not as bad.

    3. Re:Election Time by SargentDU · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't once be enough? Do you really care anyway? :P

    4. Re:Election Time by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1

      I'm interested in the story of the interstate death threats. You can't unring the bell... He needs to share

    5. Re:Election Time by Kamokazi · · Score: 1

      Generally getting a death threat that you believe is serious enough to call the FBI about certainly has some sort of potentially interesting backstory.

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    6. Re:Election Time by hansamurai · · Score: 3, Funny

      Anytime I get on I94.

    7. Re:Election Time by Malevolyn · · Score: 1

      Oh, you know us nerds. Optimize some of our code or create a competing product: death threats. Kill us in a game: death threats. Internet argument: death threats.

      --
      Your ad here.
    8. Re:Election Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he probably does if he's a black presidential candidate

    9. Re:Election Time by Zatoichi007 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've had good luck with my local FBI office (Ann Arbor) when I received an interstate death threat.

      Yet another reason I make all my death threats locally...

    10. Re:Election Time by genner · · Score: 1

      Generally getting a death threat that you believe is serious enough to call the FBI about certainly has some sort of potentially interesting backstory.

      I was on a jury that sentenced a guy for making death threats. I surprised the authorities aren't doing anything. Try the local police department if the FBI won't listen.

    11. Re:Election Time by dpiven · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dude, ya gotta take those Illinois plates off when you go north of the Cheddar Curtain.

      Either that, or put a Packers decal in your window.

    12. Re:Election Time by kingturkey · · Score: 1

      mis-moderated

  7. Well at least I know who NOT to blame by Bonker · · Score: 1

    I get one or two of these car warranty scam calls a day, all from exactly the same number, hers or another victim's I would assume.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  8. I know it would suck, but... by rehtonAesoohC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...why doesn't she just change her phone number?!

    It surely seems like an easy solution to the problem, and she'll stop getting angry calls from random people. Not to mention the fact that the number will no longer be valid, and the spoofers will have to get a new number to fake. Though I wonder how they got her number in the first place. Someone randomly punch in numbers, or did they actually pick her out for some reason?

    1. Re:I know it would suck, but... by iangoldby · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...why doesn't she just change her phone number?!

      Why should she change her phone number for goodness sake? She has done nothing wrong. She's had that number for over 50 years. Seriously, you should be outraged against those who have actually done wrong here, not suggesting she take the rap herself.

    2. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Foldarn · · Score: 1

      That's simply putting a bandaid on the issue instead of performing surgery to fix it entirely.

    3. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is your name Michael Bolton?

    4. Re:I know it would suck, but... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      There is no reason they need to spoof with a real number.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    5. Re:I know it would suck, but... by graphicsguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why should she change her phone number for goodness sake?

      Even if the perpetrators are caught, she may still have to change her phone number, so she should probably consider just doing it now. Now that her number has been associated with the scammers, the effects may linger for a long time.

    6. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because she's getting death threats! She's done nothing wrong, but some psycho is going to think she called him at lunch and go out, hunt her down (her address has been posted online according to the article) and injure or kill her. She is retarded to not change the number.

    7. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Shajenko42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Being in the right does not mean you don't get hurt.

      Sometimes bad people get away with things, and there's nothing you can do to get them back. You just have to do the best you can to protect yourself, and changing your phone number is a relatively minor thing to do to end this.

    8. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the point. The idea here is to get her out of this unpleasant situation as quickly and surely as possible, and that might be most efficient way to acomplish that, albeit not the most satisfying one.

    9. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does anyone else find it odd that people are always so focused on individuality and not being "just a number" and then hold onto our phone number for dear life?

    10. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Grey_14 · · Score: 1

      Maybe from societies point of view, but from her point of view that fixes the issue, it's unlikely the scammers will bother tracking down her new phone number just to use it. And the FBI should be the ones concerned with society and the greater good, and if they're not well... shame on them I guess.

    11. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Foldarn · · Score: 1

      touche

    12. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Morally I agree with you, but realistically the legal imperative isn't there to catch those responsible, and even if they were caught it doesn't change the situation.

      The real problem is that good security was never built into telecommunications systems as they were designed by people who were used to being the only game in town. Now that's not true anymore, anyone with a PC and an internet connection can get into the game, but there's no security behind it. Telcos don't really give a crap as long as you buy their service so there's no help there, and the FBI only really care about "serious" crime so it's unlikely they are going to tackle the issue. It's a global game of hot potato that won't be solved without serious work.

      It sucks balls but there it is. Tell her to get a new damn number

    13. Re:I know it would suck, but... by CrtxReavr · · Score: 1

      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
      safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
                                      -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759

      -CR

      --
      "So is the BSD licence even more 'free' (than GPLv2)? Yes. Unquestionably." --Linus Torvalds (TinyURL.com/2vugzl)
    14. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Sun.Jedi · · Score: 1

      and changing your phone number is a relatively minor thing to do to end this.

      How many people do you tell that to? Surely if the spoofed address/phone number is offline, the TMers will choose another.

      Solve the problem, don't shift the problem.

    15. Re:I know it would suck, but... by MojoRilla · · Score: 1

      She should change her number because her current number is no longer safe. Now that it has been used to commit a crime, and posted to the net in association with crime, all sorts of bad things might happen to her.

      Your question is like "Why shouldn't someone change their locks when they get their house broken into?" Sure, the criminal who broke into the house is guilty, but the homeowner who has inadequate locks needs to change them as well. Or should a person insist on using a compromised credit card number that they have had for years, or get a new one?

      Plus, she doesn't own the number anyway. If she has had it for 50 years, it could have changed several times due to area code changes and rules for local dialing. As much as we like to think we own our numbers, the local telcos actually own them, and we lease them for a time. The local telco can decide for any reason to change our numbers.

    16. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and with a wave of your hand and a magic incantation of "It wasn't her fault," all the associated troubles will just evaporate. Nice strategy there, Bob. If you just wish hard enough...

    17. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually... they can send whatever ANI(caller ID) they choose. Almost all telcos rely on the sending party to provide accurate ANI information when using any kind of digital trunking.
      I can (since I have access to my pbx here at work) tell my phone to display 900-555-1234 on external caller ID if I so choose, regardless of if it's valid or not. I can also choose to send nothing, in which case you would receive the standard 'Unavailable' or 'Restricted' depending on how your telco handles missing ANI information.

    18. Re:I know it would suck, but... by idontgno · · Score: 1

      There's no reason they'd take any effort to avoid a real number. Just yank 10 digits out of your posterior and spam away. If it's Mr. "This number has been disconnected", so what? If it's a little old lady, so what?

      Or, if you wanna get inside the "thought process" involved:

      Let's see.... carefully pick a number to avoid hurting any innocent bystanders... lots of effort for me.
      Just grab a number at random and screw you over? Lots of inconvenience and disruption for you, but more importantly much less work for me..
      Let me think, what to do, what to do...?"

      Anyone wanna lay odds on how that decision will go? Didn't think so.

      Spammer, scammers, and swindlers aren't into that particular career path because they're too kind and altruistic for regular employment, you know.

      On an unrelated and bitter note, wtf is wrong with <blockquote>? I can't get the "Anyone wanna lay odds" sentence to render outside of the quotation, but it is definitely outside of the boundaries of the tag.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    19. Re:I know it would suck, but... by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Interesting. It views correctly in the normal comment view, but in edit/reply/preview view, it mis-renders.

      Hey, CmdrTaco, fix the damn slashcode already!

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    20. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With her address already posted, a psycho will be able to do as you are saying even after she changes her number. She'll also need to change her address.

    21. Re:I know it would suck, but... by KovaaK · · Score: 1

      I suppose you could justify shifting the problem if you hope that it lands on someone who has the time/money to take those people on legally. Also, if it becomes more widespread in the FBI's eyes (more than a handful of people complaining about it), maybe they will start acting more seriously about it.

    22. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it is not a solution. The problem is that people are using fake phone numbers, and they need to stop. Changing her phone number doesn't solve the problem that they are still using the wrong numbers. It's just passing the buck. Maybe the next time, they should use your number. This makes me think of people who say "Just reinstall Windows" instead of finding the actual problem and keep doing that every so many months because the problem keeps coming back.

    23. Re:I know it would suck, but... by slothbait · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >> Not to mention the fact that the number
      >> will no longer be valid, and the spoofers
      >> will have to get a new number to fake.

      Nope. They can make the caller id 555-555-5555 or any thing they want. It doesn't need to be valid number

      I use the 555-0100 to 555-0199 block to call out to company cellphones. By saving something like "Sales" "Marketing!" "Cust Support!" "Server Room is 90F" as the name of each number we can know what the call is about.

    24. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The effects will linger more or less forever because the spammer(s) will never be caught or stopped. The clearance rate for homicides in the US is about 65% and I imagine we try harder in that category than in catching caller ID spoofers.

      To turn this situation around a bit: A few years ago someone broke into my house. Their efforts to steal firearms were thwarted by the fact that I store mine in a formidable safe so they left with just my checkbook. There are places where, had I not had that safe, I would be charged with a crime.

      The police suggested I close my checking account though, because the liklihood of their catching the person who took is was about 0%.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    25. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I hate people who use the word "should" like this. No he shouldn't. He's explaining the obvious simple solution. No need to be up in arms, raise your stress level, be angry with the world. TFA makes it sound like this dear old lady is impotent. But she isn't. She just has to change the phone number.

    26. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Once your phone number or email address is spoofed by a spammer, it's as good as dead. Some years ago my email address got spoofed by a spammer and my inbox got flooded by "you have a virus" and "stop spamming me!" threats, and no matter what I tried the damage was done. My only solution was a quick email change, and I never heard of this again.

    27. Re:I know it would suck, but... by sustik · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Now that her number has been associated with the scammers

      Somewhat off-topic, but if someones identity is stolen do they have to change it as weel? New fingerprint, SSN, name change...?

      Anyway, in her place I would:

      1. Report the death threats to the FBI. I know that the shmuck making the threat had no clue that there is such a thing as caller ID spoofing (neither did I), BUT making a death threat was wrong and further even other threats (say legal action against a scam caller) should be preceded by making sure you got the right guy. If she reports all those making the threats, then suddenly more people will wisen up that there is a problem with the system (caller ID spoofing is possible) and will work for the needed change.

      2. Consider legal action against the phone company. The company sells the caller ID service for money, I would check the fine print whether some liability may fall on the phone company because the incorrectness of the info. At least the phone company should educate its customers that the caller ID info is not guaranteed to be acurate.

    28. Re:I know it would suck, but... by HeavyD14 · · Score: 2, Informative

      ANI and Caller ID are not the same. You can send whatever Caller ID you want, but you can't change the ANI data. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_number_identification

    29. Re:I know it would suck, but... by TomTraynor · · Score: 1

      Legit number or not they can spoof anything. I routinely get 000-000-0000 from telemarketers spoofing the NPA. They just picked a number and put that in. The thing is that the telcos should not allow this except for legit reasons (ie women shelters, police).

      --
      Panic now, beat the rush!
    30. Re:I know it would suck, but... by xlsior · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...why doesn't she just change her phone number?!

      <officespace>
      Why should I change my name?! He's the one that sucks!
      </officespace>

    31. Re:I know it would suck, but... by JoelG · · Score: 1

      I second this. ANI and Caller ID are definitely 2 separate animals.

      --
      Quandary in the Making
    32. Re:I know it would suck, but... by vvaduva · · Score: 1

      You are probably right; it's likely the number is already in some database somewhere being discussed by a bunch of pissed off people. Good point.

    33. Re:I know it would suck, but... by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      Being in the right does not mean you don't get hurt.

      Cowardice asks the question - is it safe?
      Expediency asks the question - is it politic?
      Vanity asks the question - is it popular?
      But conscience asks the question - is it right?
      And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular; but one must take it because it is right.
              - Martin Luther King

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    34. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My number was entered falsely on some random person's credit report and I get threatening calls all the time from skip tracers who don't believe I am not the person they are seeking. It might even have been some lazy skip tracer entering a number he picked out of the phone book for a name that sounded the same.
      All the same, I have tried mightily to have the number expunged from the files of the folks who call, yet it has a life of its own.
      I don't think there are any laws in place that control what number you can say is yours.
      Changing the number won't necessarily fix the problem as you will likely be reassigned one that was abandoned by the previous user with finite odds that they did so because they were getting bad calls.
      Unless someone I care to talk to makes an appointment by email or IM, I just don't answer my phone anymore.

    35. Re:I know it would suck, but... by xaxa · · Score: 1

      The police suggested I close my checking account though, because the liklihood of their catching the person who took is was about 0%.

      Don't you just phone the bank, tell them your cheque book was stolen, and let them deal with it? I think they just cancel all the cheques (and probably hand any they receive over to the police).

    36. Re:I know it would suck, but... by iangoldby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The thing is, the lady is well aware that she could change her number - so much is obvious from the original question. But it seems that she has already chosen not to go down that route.

      To suggest an answer that has already been rejected is at best unhelpful, and at worst quite insulting if it implies that her views are not taken seriously.

      I respect her decision to take a stand on this. I also respect her wish to find a solution that doesn't compromise that stand.

    37. Re:I know it would suck, but... by vlpronj · · Score: 1

      Why should I have to pay for a fence to keep unwanted people off my property? Why should I have to pay to put a lock on my door? Sometimes the good have to pay, or suffer, to thwart the bad.

    38. Re:I know it would suck, but... by nasor · · Score: 1

      It's true that there's no moral reason why she should have to change her phone number, but that doesn't mean that changing her number isn't the best course of action for her. One can be outraged about the people who have actually done wrong but still recognize that changing her number is the best solution.

    39. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tyler Durden says: you are not your phone number.

    40. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

      That'd be the preferred solution if you actually had the power to solve the problem. But if you don't, shifting it is the best you can do.

    41. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Zadaz · · Score: 1

      Good point. If I'm crossing the street with the light and a bus feels like blowing through, I really should stand my ground and get hit by the bus. After all, I have the right of way!

      Look, we're all geeks here. We all know that there is a right way to solve a problem and there's an effective way to do it. Often these are very different. And when there's a deadline looming (or an old lady getting death threats) you take the effective one.

    42. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Lurker2288 · · Score: 1

      If I'm the one getting angry calls because my number was spoofed, then my problem is solved by getting a new number.

    43. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Lurker2288 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Maintain some perspective: she's not making the choice to face down the tanks in Tianaman Square. She's choosing not to switch numbers because doing so is a pain. If nobody is taking her seriously, and her only recourse is to hire a lawyer, or get into a battle with the telco, then it's fair to point out that the aggravation associated with her 'stand' may be far greater than just switching numbers.

    44. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says the man who was assassinated.

      There are plenty of people willing to martyrs. I'm not one of them.

    45. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If she keeps the number, there will be an ongoing psycho threat. If she changes it, there may still be a psycho out there stalking her but new psychos won't be turned on to her every day by the scammers.

    46. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 1

      Sort of. The way it worked at my bank, I called in the range of checks that was stolen. But each forged check would post to my account and the associated funds would be temporarily unavailable for 24 hours before the bank would reverse it out and return the check to the retailer unpaid.

      By closing the account I avoided the random ups and downs associated with that.

      And further, the retailers who accepted the forged checks required an Affadavit of Forgery for each one to convince them not to pursue me for writing bad checks. So often, fair or not, the person on the receiving end of the crime has to do most of the work.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    47. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Tired+and+Emotional · · Score: 1

      Is that likely that her number has not changed for 50 years? 50 years ago surely her number would have been 4 or 5 digits and certainly not 10. Her number from fifty years ago may be a suffix of her current number (and only in base 10 at that) but not the same.

      --
      Squirrel!
    48. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please post the name of your bank so we can all avoid it.

    49. Re:I know it would suck, but... by iangoldby · · Score: 1

      it's fair to point out that the aggravation associated with her 'stand' may be far greater than just switching numbers.

      I'm sure she's well aware of that. The fact remains that it is usually better to say "I don't have an answer for her" than to given an answer that violates one of the constraints.

      Oh, but I forgot - this is Ask Slashdot :-(

    50. Re:I know it would suck, but... by dword · · Score: 1

      ...why doesn't she just change her phone number?!

      ...why doesn't she just change her address?!

      The damage has already been done. FTFS, her address has already been publicly posted and associated with the scammers. The main issue here is they're guilty and they need to be punished.

      This is the same as saying, after a bank robbery, "why didn't they just use a stronger safe?"
      I hate it when idiots just read the headline, a couple of sentences FTFS and find a way for the people to ignore the problem in the future. I understand TFAs are usually long and you /. at work and don't have time to RTFA but in all the gods' names, if you open your mouth, make sure you know what you're saying?
      People come to http://ask.slashdot.org/ because they have a problem and they're asking us for help on how to fix it, not just ignore it.

      (I know I'm risking a "troll" mod for this post, but is it not true?)

    51. Re:I know it would suck, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would they bother to find a fake one?

    52. Re:I know it would suck, but... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Why would they bother to find one at all? Just make it up...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  9. class action these bastards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    we need an angry mob to find these car warranty robo-caller bitches and give them hell. i get a call from them (from a different number each time) like once a week. you have to listen all the way to the end of the message to hear what button to press to be removed, and doing so doesn't appear to take you off the list. this is a clear violation of the do-not-call laws and i want in on a class action lawsuit to put them out of business. kthxbye.

    1. Re:class action these bastards by Sun.Jedi · · Score: 2, Funny

      we need an angry mob to find these car warranty robo-caller bitches and give them hell.

      Yaknow ... I used to get a few these calls per week. One of the OP states that they laugh at you if you mention the DNC, or ask to be removed from their call list which is my experience as well.

      I have not been called since I asked for extended warranty on my '72 Dodge Dart. Seems they realized I was going to be a dick, and stopped calling.

      YMMV.

    2. Re:class action these bastards by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 1

      This MSNBC article suggests filing a complaint with the FTC to stop the calls. Apparently the bulk of the warranty scams are coming out of St. Louis and the Missouri Attorney General is currently investigating many of the companies selling these warranties in his state.

  10. Bogus. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The call can quite easily be traced back to where it came from -- even if it's voip in nature, at very least you can find the originating carrier and they can deal with their customer.

    We run a very popular VoIP service (http://ironvoice.com) and tightly control caller id in a manner that still gives our customers flexibility but still imposes responsibility.

    The FBI can certainly help, that's bogus. The phone company can certainly help, that's bogus as well. The phone company knows from which carrier the call came from and so on and so forth until they can pin down the offending carrier.

    Legislation isn't the answer -- customer service is.

    1. Re:Bogus. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Legislation has nothing to do with it. The act itself is already against the law. The people doing it are behaving like criminals and should be treated as such. Why do you think a legitimate company would want to hide its telephone number? Fraud!

    2. Re:Bogus. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree.

      Considering all our emails and phone calls are scanned by our government, I'd think this a very easy task to fix.

      I'm not sure anyone can consider speaking ill of someone, then posting that individual's name, number, and address
      on the internet as well-meaning.

    3. Re:Bogus. by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

      The call can quite easily be traced back to where it came from

      Remember, in this case, the victim isn't the one getting the calls.

      She might be able to have the calls of the people who call her traced, but that's not the source of the problem. It's the people who call other people using her number who she needs to know the number of.

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    4. Re:Bogus. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This may be true, but it is incredibly easy to spoof anyone's name/number using VoIP and a VoIP provider that passes through your own settings. All that you need to do is confuse the receiver of the call.

      The only sensible thing to do is throw away caller ID since there is nothing you can do except not trust caller ID. I don't know how many calls I've got over the last six months even, with CIDs like 123-4 or something similar.

      It's silly. Caller ID is dead to me.

      It's answer and then the hunt begins!

    5. Re:Bogus. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the problem is that the spammers aren't calling the little old lady, but that they're spoofing their caller ID by using the little old lady's number. On an independent basis, this would mean working with one of the angry people who think they're calling back the spammers but are actually inadvertently calling the little old lady instead.

  11. Call the FCC? by urbanriot · · Score: 4, Informative

    In Canada, we have a governing body similar to your FCC called the CRTC. Whenever we have such problems we can contact them and they'll conduct an investigation. So far I've put an end to three instances of harassing telemarketing / late night fax blitzing. I'd contact the FCC next, see what they have to say. Someone somewhere is in charge of moderating this...

    1. Re:Call the FCC? by mr_mischief · · Score: 2

      The Federal Trade Commission may help, too, if it's a US company from another state.

    2. Re:Call the FCC? by TomTraynor · · Score: 2, Informative

      Doesn't work if the call comes from outside of Canada. I got those at times and the CRTC told me to take it up with the telcos. The telcos said it came out of country and they couldn't do a thing. I ended up going to the FTC and FCC and leaving a note there, but, nothing has happened so far.

      --
      Panic now, beat the rush!
    3. Re:Call the FCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CRTC has as much teeth as an average swallow (African or European, your pick).

      Now the conservatives have convoluted things even further by creating Commissioner for Complaints for Telecommunications services.

      Good Luck. Big Businesses and government do not care.

      The poor lady is just another victim of progress. Next!

    4. Re:Call the FCC? by jmanforever · · Score: 1

      Great idea...

      The FCC consumer hotline toll-free number is 1-888-CALL-FCC (1-888-225-5322)

      They have an entire department dedicated to telephone issues.

  12. whocalled.us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can use http://whocalled.us/ to coordinate investigation. Even though the number is spoofed, as long as they are using it consistently it is still an identifier. As everyone shares facts they discover it's possible to find the true identity.

    Caller ID spoofing has become a real problem, but political representatives are too busy flashing around fake solutions to hyperinflated problems, like throwing more money at stopping the 9000 pedo penises from raping children over the internets.

    If anyone has a technological solution, please post it, as we have more of a chance of fixing this stuff as engineers than the politicians do as legislators.

    1. Re:whocalled.us by kindbud · · Score: 1

      My technological solution is to change the name of Caller ID to Caller Screen Name. Then no one will be confused about what it means anymore.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    2. Re:whocalled.us by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

      You can use http://whocalled.us/ to coordinate investigation. Even though the number is spoofed, as long as they are using it consistently it is still an identifier. As everyone shares facts they discover it's possible to find the true identity.

      And whocalled will tell her that her phone number and her address are the source of the scam calls.

      That's not the solution... that's the problem.

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  13. Wire Fraud by Ice+Tiger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Doesn't this count as wire fraud?

    Mind you this practice will get attention when the numbers used are not those of citizens but those used by government lobbying corporations.

    --
    "Because we are not employing at entry level, offshoring will kill our industry stone dead."
    1. Re:Wire Fraud by pete-classic · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you have to actually defraud someone out of money for it to be wire fraud. Otherwise, I think it's just "wire lying".

      If they spoofed her caller ID and then called and got Social Security to send them her checks, that would be wire fraud.

      -Peter

    2. Re:Wire Fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Ah, well lucky for her that the federal wire fraud statute punishes a scheme to defraud, not just the fraud itself. So if somebody is using communications in interstate commerce in a scheme to defraud, it's illegal. The hard part is getting a US Attorney to prosecute.

      dom

    3. Re:Wire Fraud by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      Sure, but if they are committing fraud over the phone it is wire fraud, without regard to caller ID spoofing.

      -Peter

  14. Easy to fix... by Piranhaa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I calle the FBI in Boston (near where she lives) and they said they can't help

    Just tell them people are getting bomb threats... That should easily get this put on their #1 list and resolved in about 5 minutes tops. Isn't that why they phone tap everyone?

    1. Re:Easy to fix... by megamerican · · Score: 1

      They don't have to tap anyones phones anymore because the NSA is the phone company.

      --
      If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
    2. Re:Easy to fix... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the FBI in Boston. Her phone doesn't have enough LEDs on it to count as a threat.

    3. Re:Easy to fix... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, since they're phone-tapping everyone, they'll know the claim of bomb threats is false and arrest the little old lady for making a false report. :-)

      Really, though, law enforcement should be called on the basis of someone issuing threats (that's a crime), although the threats are not coming from the scammers, and her local phone company should be getting involved otherwise they look like a bunch of schmucks.

      But, in the end, she will likely have to get a new number only because of the persistence of memory on the net and that it's so often the wrong thing that's remembered so well.

    4. Re:Easy to fix... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I calle the FBI in Boston (near where she lives) and they said they can't help

      Just tell them people are getting bomb threats...

      And then get yourself arrested for filing a false report.

  15. Quick workarounds by grub · · Score: 4, Interesting


    1) Have her set up an answering machine with a short explanation.
    2) Get the mainstream media involved.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Quick workarounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call Forward to the FBI. Let them deal with getting the angry phone calls back. ;)

    2. Re:Quick workarounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or she could have her answering machine loaded with the "Dee-dee-DEEEEEEEEEE! We're sorry the number you have dialed is no longer in service. Please check the number and dial again." I got rid of tons of telemarketers when we had that on our machine and all I had to do was tell everyone who we knew to just wait for the tone to leave a message. It works well for angry callers since they won't bother listening much past the tones.

  16. how much is the irritation worth? by thedak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Being in that situation I think I would be changing my number first thing -- if the problem is so bad that you are going to the FBI it's time to change the number and spare her the grief and stress from dealing with all the angry calls.

    After that is done then it's time to try to sort out the problem from the source; as for what route one would take for that? I cannot be sure, but I do believe that the first course of action should be changing the number and making the calls stop.

    I'd think the phone company should be kind enough to happily assist in that, since they're so unwilling to try to help solve the problem itself.

  17. FCC by dogberto · · Score: 1

    How about starting with the FCC instead? They have some enforcement powers regarding communications. Though whether or not those powers extend to Caller ID spoofing is unknown to me.

  18. Posting her address? by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well intentioned or not, those guys are fucking assholes.

    1. Re:Posting her address? by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      That's the problem with vigilantism, there are no safeguards. The law may not be perfect, but at least it usually bothers to check the facts.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  19. Same boat by Ollabelle · · Score: 3, Funny
    I'm suffering through the same thing with scammers using my direct office line, although it's not as bad as this guy's mother - about 5-10 calls a week.

    About all I can do is have a nice conversation with the caller, explain the situation, and ask them to talk with the scammer next time and find out who they are. I volunteer that I have some employees in Afghanistan who, in exchange for a ticket home, will be happy to pay the bastards a visit.

    --
    Ibid.
    1. Re:Same boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have this friend, who likes this girl, but he doesn't know how to tell her.....

      Stop with the Nice old lady crap we know it's you!

  20. Her phone company can't help by DragonPup · · Score: 1

    Her phone company can't change the CallerID info from another provider. Now if they can find out the phone number of the scammers, they can find what company provides phone.

    --
    "Useless organic meatbag" -HK-47
    1. Re:Her phone company can't help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should just update the systems to use ANI. It's what 800 numbers use to get the correct phone number. This is particularly annoying since I'm paying for the call when they call my cell phone and I'm not afforded this service.

  21. identity theft? by WarlockSquire · · Score: 1

    I wonder if you could claim identity theft...
    sue them for fraud.

    IANAL

  22. Government, especially Attorney General by Blinded+By+The+Light · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Call the State Attorney General, then call the US Senators (John Kerry and Ted Kennedy), then the Governor's office. Explain what has been done and the reaction received. I bet the Attorney General will do something about it.

  23. political calls by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

    I've been receiving political calls through spoofed caller ID tags. All of the calls appear to come from residents in my town but end up being recordings. I don't answer the phone if I don't recognize the name.. but once I got a call from a guy I knew in high school that I randomly ran into 2 weeks prior.. ended up being a machine recording of Obama.

    I'm about to cancel my phone all together, no point when it's 95% spam calls.

    --
    "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    1. Re:political calls by Phoenix+Rising · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty serious allegation, and something the campaign would be interested in knowing about.

      The Obama campaign has no reason to spoof phone numbers for its own robocalls. Same goes with any official political call, unless it's a slimy call to start with...

      --
      Let us live so that when we come to die, even the undertaker will be sorry -- Mark Twain
    2. Re:political calls by Drathos · · Score: 1

      Same goes with any official political call, unless it's a slimy call to start with...

      It's a political call. What would it be aside from slimy?

      --
      End of line..
    3. Re:political calls by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      I remember last year my caller ID would say "political call".... so of course I never answered it then. This year it seems the campaigns realized few people wanted political calls so now they are hiding them.

      I'm not saying Obama is the only one doing it, I've had messages left on my machine from local and national politicians from both parties.. I just happened to pick up the phone during the Obama one because I thought it was a call from someone I actually knew.

      I wonder if it's possible people are giving permission to campaigns to allow their phone to be used...? I'm sure it's a loophole in the law.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    4. Re:political calls by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Remember, if they can spoof the callerID, they can spoof the pitch. It's not unheard of for campaign A to robocall random numbers with a pitch for Campaign B, just to piss off voters, who then won't vote for Campaign B.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  24. State's Attorney by exiguus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can try contacting your state's attorney. They're normally pretty helpful ... because most are elected (at least in my state anyway).

  25. How do we know she isn't a terrorist? by MosesJones · · Score: 5, Funny

    Come on its 2008, we can't just take such trifling things as an individuals vouching for someone and their previous good record. She SAYS that she didn't make the call, but what would she say if she was waterboarded? Would she stick to her story or switch it to admit that she did make all the calls?

    Sure she claims that she doesn't want to change her number just because she has had it for 50 years, but couldn't that be because she co-ordinates a major terrorist cell of grandmas across america (known in intelligence circles as Al-Quilter)? These evil women are spreading hate through out of date sugary treats and a fondness for knowing everything that is going on in the world while comparing it unfavourably with their own personal ideology of "it was better when I was young". We must stop these pedallers of hate against modern American who condemn the US of A as going to hell in a hand cart and not the sort of country that they want to live in. Death to Al-Quilter

    I say condemn her based on the irrefutable caller ID evidence.

    Seriously though its good that this old dear has someone looking out for her because in modern America you could easily see her being prosecuted because of an unfortunate conjunction of evidence.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  26. from the advocate-violence-in-this-case dept. by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

    Is that official /. editorial policy?

    1. Re:from the advocate-violence-in-this-case dept. by Lurker2288 · · Score: 1

      That's MY official policy.

      Sincerely,
      Batman

  27. The crims will win by Madman · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately the only realistic way for her to get some peace is to change her number as the damage is done. It's the phone equivalent of a joe-job.

    If she's willing to tough it out it will die down, the criminals will have moved on to another number by now so there will be less angry calls.

    tell her to bite the bullet and get a new number

  28. What is the callback number? by damn_registrars · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm guessing based on my own experience with calls from various phone scammers that they left a 1-800 call back number, right?

    If thats the case, see if you can figure out who sold the 1-800 number. I have been dealing with annoying bogus credit counselors that won't stop calling and leaving their 1-800 numbers as callbacks. There are some good resources for this stuff online that may be able to help you find the company who sold the number - they are sold similarly to web domains, though without any obligation to anyone to release the data on who has it.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:What is the callback number? by bugnuts · · Score: 1

      Right... an anonymous car warranty seller won't get ANY business. They have to leave contact information somehow.

      Find out who it is from one of the angry callers. Hell, use caller ID to call them back and ask :-)

      Once you know who it is, you probably can't really prove they made the calls... they probably hired someone. That doesn't matter. Get a junkyard dog lawyer, and sue the corporation. A civil suit only has to convince 2/3 of a jury. Who the hell won't side with the grandma? They will know this, and settle far before it even reaches jury selection, and they'll pay your grandma for her trouble.

    2. Re:What is the callback number? by molo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I got one of these calls. It was to my cell phone, from a caller ID of 414-302-xxxx. It was a robocall asking about renewing my "vehicle warranty", and that I should press 1 to talk to a rep. So I pressed 1 and asked the rep what vehicle warranty this was about (as I don't have any vehicle under warranty). She said that she couldn't tell me for security reasons (!!) and that it was usually a '95-'97 model year. I told her I had no such vehicle, and she said she would "remove me from their list." End of call.

      The whole thing was very hokey. I think they are looking for people with older cars because they usually have less money to fight back against them with. Preying on the weak, these people are really scum.

      -molo

      --
      Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
    3. Re:What is the callback number? by Drathos · · Score: 1

      I receive spoofed caller id, pre-recorded calls on my cell phone for credit card debt reduction, car warranties, and mortgages that leave no number, identify themselves only as "Bob," "Jim," or whatever and do not provide a number. They tell you to press a number to talk to a rep, but if you do, most of the time they hang up on you. If you get through to a person and either ask to be taken off their list or for any information about who they are, they hang up on you.

      They do everything they can to *not* be identified because they know it's illegal.

      --
      End of line..
    4. Re:What is the callback number? by david_thornley · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So where's the motivation?

      We aren't talking about prank calls here, we're talking about scams and the like. These require a method of extracting money from the mark. Therefore, for all of these calls, there has to be some way to transfer money from the callee to the caller. Since this method has to work for dim-witted callees (since it won't for alert and suspicious ones), it can't be too obscure.

      People don't run illegal operations just to do something illegal, but to make money. They can't have perfect security or they won't make money.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    5. Re:What is the callback number? by DCheesi · · Score: 1

      My guess? They're looking for someone gullible. If you sound gullible they'll talk to you; if you sound annoyed or skeptical, they hang up. Not sure about hanging up as soon as he presses a button, though; maybe they get few enough hits that they're not always ready to take the call when it comes? Or maybe they're listening and hear him quietly curse them out before pressing the button...

    6. Re:What is the callback number? by Drathos · · Score: 1

      When I managed to get a person on one of the "debt reduction" calls, right off the bat the lady asked "What credit card do you want help with?" The instant you start asking questions, they hang up. I'm guessing that their whole scam is to find idiots willing to just hand over their account information.

      --
      End of line..
    7. Re:What is the callback number? by Drathos · · Score: 1

      Given that the whole thing is run by an auto-dialer, it probably calls far more numbers than they have of "customer service reps." If too many answer and follow through, the call is terminated instead of putting you on hold.

      --
      End of line..
    8. Re:What is the callback number? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't, is not worth your time, no matter how much free time you have.

      1-800 numbers are usually sold/rented to corporations who rent them to other corporations who rent them to other corporations and so on. Any every one of them makes cash with it. What do you think how motivated they are on ratting out their customers...?

    9. Re:What is the callback number? by Lije+Baley · · Score: 1

      Hey, if Obama can heal the lepers, certainly he can fix this! After all, that could be his grandma getting all those calls.

      --
      Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
    10. Re:What is the callback number? by lamapper · · Score: 1

      ...I think they are looking for people with older cars because they usually have less money to fight back against them with. Preying on the weak, these people are really scum.

      -molo

      I too was thinking, why, if you check online there are many people getting these calls and many of them do NOT have cars...so what is the motivation?

      Perhaps to get a list of numbers to call for another reason? (ie. perceived to be poor)

      Perhaps simply because you answered the phone. I have noticed comments that the caller hung up when a person answered?

      Perhaps an automated system gathering information to be sold to someone else?

      I can honestly think of no reason to legitimately answering the phone. With VoIP at least you are NOT getting charged for the call as you will if you exceed your plan with a cellular phone. Either way, just hitting the red hangup button would cut that call.

      --
      Is your Internet Throttled? Install DD-Wrt, OpenWRT or Tomato to learn the truth! Google: 1Gbps/1Gbps: 5 Communities
  29. Get the word out like you did. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the Feds can't or won't handle it, what's the best approach here?

    Get the word out.

    No legitimate organization will use telemarketers or email or snail mail to generate business.

    Wait, what? You say there are plenty of legitimate organizations that use those methods?

    I say, discount all and the legitimate organizations will change their methods.

    The crooks will stop; like "Card Services".

    The charities will stop hounding us who give when we can; like PBS.

    And, by the way, even legitimate businesses will give you a raw deal with their telemarketers. I once made the mistake of buying a service sold to me by Sprint's telemarketers. I didn't get what I was told and Sprint just said, "We don't have any record of that. Sorry for the inconvenience."

    I say, scorched Earth. Put ALL telemarketers and ALL snail mail spammers and ALL email spammers out of business.

  30. H109-5126 by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    ...and ask them to reintroduce this.

    Good luck- they're all checked out for the election cycle and any time they do spend will be concerning stuffing their local pork into "stimulus" and bailout packages, instead of appropriate-for-federal-level legislation like this.

  31. Voicemail? by MadHakish · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not, for the immediate future, setup her voicemail to answer after 1 ring, and set the voicemail message to something like "This phone number is being falsely used by a telemarketing company as their caller ID. Please call your local phone company and tell them you have received a telemarketing call using an hijacked caller ID entry.". If you can find out the actual company doing it, I'd throw their real phone number and company name in their too, just for good measure. At the very least, people will know not to leave a nice elderly lady death threats, and hopefully your phone company will take notice and track down the offending telemarketers and cut their "lines" off. I'd bet the voicemail volume drops significantly, legitimate ones get through and leave a message, and you'll probably hear a few less death threats against grandma.

    --
    Wisest is he who knows he does not know.
    1. Re:Voicemail? by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a great idea....for the telemarketers to use.

      Convince them that their phone number is actually the phone number of a nice old lady, who has actually had that number for 50 years.

      --

      Question everything

    2. Re:Voicemail? by Insightfill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why not, for the immediate future, setup her voicemail to answer after 1 ring, and set the voicemail message to something like...

      Because: I've noticed that most people don't listen to the outgoing voicemail message. During the ringing and soon after the pickup, most people are mentally rehearsing their script in their head. "Hi, I'm calling to tell you..." I've created messages to the effect of "I'm not in the office, won't be back for a week, and won't be checking messages. Here's an alternate number for you to try..." and they STILL leave a message oblivious to what I've just told them, asking for immediate or short-term response.

    3. Re:Voicemail? by MadHakish · · Score: 1

      It is truly a pleasure to meet an individual at least as cynical as I.. ;-)

      --
      Wisest is he who knows he does not know.
    4. Re:Voicemail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case try something like:

      > Hello, don't leave a message...
      >
      >
      > No, really don't leave a message...
      >
      >
      > Instead try calling the number I'm about to give you...
      >
      >
      > Are you ready?
      >
      >
      > Please try calling me on XXX - XXX - XXX
      >
      >
      > And don't bother leaving a message because I won't get it for a good week, if at all...
      >
      >
      >
      > Again, the number top call me on is XXX - XXX - XXX

      Hopefully by the time the caller is actually listening to your message they'll get the message...

    5. Re:Voicemail? by Zwicky · · Score: 1

      Hello Mr Coward.

      There are things we need to discuss for the meeting. Please get back to me as soon as you get this message.

      Thankyou

      --
      "Three eyes are better than one" -- Lieutenant Columbo
    6. Re:Voicemail? by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      Probably more so.

      You still expose your email address in merely text-obfuscated form! :-P

      --

      Question everything

    7. Re:Voicemail? by IonOtter · · Score: 1

      Because: I've noticed that most people don't listen to the outgoing voicemail message.

      That's easy to fix?

      *ring* (click)

      "You're screwed. If you want to know how to get UN-screwed, get a pen and paper, then listen to the rest of the message."

      You now have their undivided attention.

      --
      [End Of Line]
    8. Re:Voicemail? by MadHakish · · Score: 1

      Yup. It's a junk account. :)

      --
      Wisest is he who knows he does not know.
  32. Get an answering machine by swm · · Score: 1

    You have reached 123-456-7890.
    Be advised that the car warranty calls do not originate from this number;
    your caller ID was spoofed.

    If you still want to leave a message, please wait for the beep.
    <BEEP>

    1. Re:Get an answering machine by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      Ahh, I see her problem. If she wants to be the one person with phone number 123-456-7890 then there will certainly be consequences to deal with.

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    2. Re:Get an answering machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like:

      Hello, you have reached 555-1234.
      If you would like to speak with Mrs. Lil O'lady, please press or say 1.
      If you would like to leave an interstate death threat for the car scammers who used Mrs. O'lady's phone number, please press or say 2.

      Thank you for choosing to make an interstate death threat. Your call is important to us.
      Please stay on the line. You will be redirected to the local FBI office shortly.
      If you are disconnected, please call 1-800-FBI-TIPS.
      (elevator music begins)

  33. Call the FBI and telco again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'd call the FBI and the telephone company again. Be firm but polite when asking for help. Get names and phone numbers of everyone you talk to. If that person says no, ask for the next person up in the chain of command.

    Oftentimes, people just don't know how to ask for help correctly when contacting an agency such as the FBI or telephone company. If she can't clearly articulate the problem to the person on the other end of the phone they simply might not be aware of the issue or its ramifications.

    If you're able to clearly articulate the issue and still get denied, start writing letters. To the SAC of the local FBI office, or as high up as you can go to the telco. And as others suggested, contact the media: the local newspaper omsbudman, the local TV station's investigative reporter. And also as others have suggested contact your local elected representatives.

    I'm not defending the FBI or phone company, but I've seen instances where a problem simply isn't stated clearly enough for the other party to understand what's going on. So the first thing to do is ensure that when the FBI and telco are involved, that the problem is stated in correct terms (and that you're talking to the proper person in the organization).

    1. Re:Call the FBI and telco again by Wannabe+Code+Monkey · · Score: 1

      I'd call the FBI and the telephone company again. Be firm but polite when asking for help. Get names and phone numbers of everyone you talk to. If that person says no, ask for the next person up in the chain of command.

      Oftentimes, people just don't know how to ask for help correctly when contacting an agency such as the FBI or telephone company. If she can't clearly articulate the problem to the person on the other end of the phone they simply might not be aware of the issue or its ramifications.

      I definitely agree with this sentiment. I'd also suggest you read the Comsumerist article, How To Mind Control Customer Service Reps. It details tactics you can use over the phone to get them to solve problems for you. It seems the trick is to simply tell them right off the bat that they are going to help you solve your issue.

      --
      We always knew Comcast was corrupt, here's the proof: http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1909890&cid=34545432
    2. Re:Call the FBI and telco again by random+coward · · Score: 1

      Also contact the state's public service comission. They regulate the carriers in the state. You want action from a telephone company you pretty much have to get them involved.

    3. Re:Call the FBI and telco again by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      From the linked Consumerist article:

      4. When you get a CSR on the phone, immediately ask to speak to a supervisor When/if they insist that they can help you, keeping your tone low and even, state again that you need to speak to a supervisor. Not want, need. If they again insist, state in a clear and calm, low tone, that they WILL connect you to a supervisor, now. Do not yell, shout, or raise your voice or tone. "No. You are going to get a supervisor for me. Thank you. I'll wait." Say "thank you" immediately. Do not wait for them to answer your request first. If they again insist, hang up immediately. Call back. If you get the same person, make the request again, and if they again refuse, hang up, wait one hour for a shift change, and then call back. Do not give the initial person your name. They do not need it.

      As someone who has spent a lot of time dealing with end users I'd like to point out that sometimes the tech/CSR simply isn't allowed to transfer calls to a supervisor/team lead/2nd line tech, sometimes they're only allowed to transfer certain types of calls and having some asshat call over and over and over and over again asking for a supervisor will only piss them off and result in worse service for the customer in question as well as other customers who are calling on the same day.

      Also, a customer immediately asking for a supervisor will most likely not get a supervisor at all, instead chances are the customer will be given the most formal and by-the-rules treatment possible to make the whole experience as painful as possible since guess what, techs/CSRs are people to and they don't like assholes trying to pull cheap tricks like that.

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    4. Re:Call the FBI and telco again by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      Yeah, as someone who has worked in a few different phone support positions, I have to agree that that line of attack is not anywhere near as effective as they think it will be. Not that it isn't still fun to transfer people even when I know there's no way in hell they'll get a different answer from my boss, though :)

      I love the bit about hanging up immediately and calling back, too - maybe that works better with the gigantic Indian call centers, but some of us work in slightly smaller places that don't change shifts every hour.

  34. Easy way out by splatacaster · · Score: 0

    She really should just change her number if she wants to completely avoid the issue. Short of that the FBI will get involved about death threats, but that won't get the spoofers to stop using her number. I really don't see a good way to find them either.

  35. Logic has it by icepick72 · · Score: 4, Funny

    She should start providing a car warranty if she wants to keep her phone number.

  36. Re: Don't sue, ask for sex. by ccandreva · · Score: 5, Funny

    Asking to be removed doesn't work.

    Citing the do not call list doesn't work. They laugh.

    Telling the male calling, in my deepest voice, that he sounds cute and I want his home number, THAT seems to work. Especially on the ones with southern accents.

    I wonder what would happen if everyone started propositioning these callers for 'favors'.

  37. I know who they are by Lookin4Trouble · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I had these assclowns call the emergency services number at my work with their auto-dialer. That number rings to a ton of desks and is SUPPOSED to spread info about a medical emergency in the building. It took a good bit of google-fu to track them via their spoofed caller ID.

    You're looking for:

    Digitcom Services, Inc.
    12923 Venice Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90066
    Phone (310) 358-7000
    TollFree(800) 464-5446
    Fax (310) 437-4105

    Please note: I am not posting this so you can pester, annoy, harass, or threaten them. If you call, call once, speak to their manager, and politely let them know what you think about their business practices. What you do with this is up to you, I hold no responsibilty for the actions of others.

    1. Re:I know who they are by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      If you call, call once, speak to their manager, and politely let them know what you think about their business practices.

      Yeah, cause they're obviously concerned about that.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    2. Re:I know who they are by molo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Can I ask how you tracked them down? I'm not too familiar with CallerID spoofing, and I'd like to know about ways to detect and defeat it.

      Thanks
      -molo

      --
      Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
    3. Re:I know who they are by teridon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Do you have proof that they are indeed the company responsible?

      --
      I hold it, that a little rebellion, now and then, is a good thing. -- Thomas Jefferson
    4. Re:I know who they are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, I just called them and got some sad sounding old lady.

    5. Re:I know who they are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proof!? this is slashdot.. we don't need no stinkin' proof

    6. Re:I know who they are by Copperhamster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh mercy these idiots... I had $100 worth of 'services' on my phone bill added a few months ago from these guys. They assured me someone signed up on their site and the money would be taken off the bill. After the second go around I took the already-filed police report for the id theft and faxed it to my phone company, and they yanked the charge off of my bill for me.

    7. Re:I know who they are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! That's my grandmother!

    8. Re:I know who they are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Digitcom Services, Inc. [address and phone number]

      I'm sure you're hoping right now, despite your "disclaimer" that a few people on slashdot are going to start flooding these numbers, whatever they may be. I suggest that you take your phone harassment trolling to some other site with a more juvenile audience.

      After all, if you really wanted to "do the right thing" you'd simply file a complaint.

    9. Re:I know who they are by Lookin4Trouble · · Score: 1

      Sorry about the delayed response. I talked to their "Customer Service" manager - Herman Moore. He assured me that in order to stop receiving the calls, all I would have to do was call some (866) number, and give them one number per call (I manage a block of 1,000 numbers for this building, I'm not about to call that 866 number a thousand times...)

      E

    10. Re:I know who they are by Lookin4Trouble · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A little google-fu, followed by a quick call to the FCC (amazing how responsive they are when an auto-dialer hits an emergency services number!) and an hour later, got a call back with the provider's number. Please note, though, that filing a complaint with the FCC and receiving this type of service is only available for a designated "Emergency Services" number (1 number out of the block of 1,000 that I manage). They check the facts of the case, so don't just call and complain every time you get an unsolicited call on your home phone number.

      E

    11. Re:I know who they are by dbcad7 · · Score: 1

      These people are so annoying.. I am not as nice as you, I could care less if someone harasses them.

      First off.. I don't own a car with a warantee (it's old and didn't have one when I bought it).. and Second if they know that my warantee is expiring, how come they don't have the information on my car ? ... As a scam, how can this possibly work ?.. Who is going to stay on the line, and be asked for the information that they would not readily have available and not realize that there is something fishy here ? ... their success rate has to be like 1 out of 500,000 calls at best... If anything, it may lead to some people calling their auto dealer to see about their warantee, but even that has to be pretty low.. I just can't see the money to be made.. I think I would have better success spamming people to give me $5 "just because I could use it".

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
    12. Re:I know who they are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wikipedia says that is them!

    13. Re:I know who they are by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a job for an auto-dialer.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    14. Re:I know who they are by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > First off.. I don't own a car with a warantee (it's old and didn't have one when I
      > bought it).. and Second if they know that my warantee is expiring, how come they don't
      > have the information on my car ?

      They get their information from public car license records maintained by the state. Those records tell them the owner's name and the make, model, and year of every car registered, from which they can figure out the likely warrantee expiration date. In your case they probably just screwed up and transcribed a date wrong or something.

      > Who is going to stay on the line, and be asked for the information that they would not
      > readily have available and not realize that there is something fishy here ?

      You'd be amazed.

      > ... their success rate has to be like 1 out of 500,000 calls at best...

      Most of the people they call will have warrantees that just expired or are about to expire. They attempt to convince you that they represent the manufacturer and are offering you an opportunity to extend your warrantee for only a few hundred dollars.

      > I think I would have better success spamming people to give me $5 "just because I could
      > use it".

      I've often wondered why I never see spams saying "This is your last opportunity to send $10 to www.theresoneborneveryminute.com".

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    15. Re:I know who they are by Ykant · · Score: 1

      Had a similar situation one a couple of years back with a set of 1000 fax DIDs - 200+ identical junk faxes a day, tying up the legitimate business transmissions.

      They told me to fill out their online form with the fax numbers to remove, ten at a time. I asked for someone in management and basically told them that it was not worth my time or effort to help them stop breaking the law (what's the fine for violating the junk fax act these days, $500 per?). The fellow at the other end asked for my block and that was the end of it. Call back and tell them to stick it.

      --
      Spelling, grammar, punctuation? We need something that checks logic.
    16. Re:I know who they are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warranty - the guarantee
      Warrantor - the person making the guarantee
      Warrantee - the person to whom the guarantee is made

    17. Re:I know who they are by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Being obnoxious geeks is a Slashdot tradition.

      And, seriously, posting AC and getting all high and mighty? How do we know you aren't the same ass posting all the first post stuff?

    18. Re:I know who they are by quetwo · · Score: 1

      Wrong:

      They are dialing each number, one-by-one. They hit my isdn circuits like a hammer, locking up over 300 channels on my T3. They started with the first number on my block, and kept going through till they were done. Many of these numbers were never assigned, so I know they didn't do the research, and they certainly didn't get the info from the state.

    19. Re:I know who they are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5 Interesting?

      He tracked them down based on the caller ID of "some car warranty scammers"? WTF

    20. Re:I know who they are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just read about it online, so that's proof enough for me!

    21. Re:I know who they are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somewhat. They "lease" their numbers to the actual responsible parties (usually off-shore), but if they didn't, I wouldn't get calls, would I?

      I have logs spanning two years of calls from HUNDREDS of different numbers in blocks owned by DigitCom.

      Some are trying to start a class-action lawsuit against them.

    22. Re:I know who they are by Lookin4Trouble · · Score: 1

      I can attest that this ^^ is fact - my phone has 4 lines on it - 3 in direct order, plus the emergency services line. I got 3 phone calls within 3 seconds of each other, from the same "OMEGA GRP" fake caller ID, ringing my lines in order, followed a few minutes later by the emergency services line fiasco.

  38. V*nage can do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    V*nage has a new feature where I can record a message and send it to hundreds of people. I believe can source the call from ANY number I wish. I dont even have to prove the number is mine.

    1. Re:V*nage can do this by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      And the web interfaces for sending SMS messages allow the web user to enter in any "from" phone number they wish.

      Anybody that believes the caller ID or the source of the SMS text message deserves what's coming to them.

      The great unwashed Joe-Six packs are finally starting to understand that the "from" address on an email message does not necessarily mean it's actually from that address at least.

  39. Solution by AndyFewt · · Score: 1

    If she refuses to change the number, put an automated answering service on the number which instructs people about the fraud or if they really want to talk to the little old lady to press 1. That way the angry people will get told its all being spoofed and wont make the threats. You can do this fairly easily with Asterisk too. Cost wise, Asterisk is free, the pc is the main cost if there isn't an existing one and you can get the required Asterisk hardware (pstn -> pci card) from Digium.

    If the govt won't help then this is the best solution without changing the number.

  40. In my mind, the next step is.... by Pizentios · · Score: 1

    In my mind, the next logical step for me would be start writing letters to my state rep and letters to the FCC. Also, i would consult a lawyer and see if there is anything that i could do legaly to track the spoofers, ie: get nasty with the phone company or request phone bills from the people that are calling her and cross check them (using her number as a reference) and see if there is a way for the phone company to track who is really making the calls. I am not sure if there really is that much you could do with a lawyer, but in any case the lawyer will atleast inform you of your rights in this situation. That little bit of information might lead to the proper solution. Here in Canada, we don't have people spoofing caller id's with other people's phone numbers yet (or atleast i haven't heard of it yet), however telemarketers do often replace their numbers with something like 000-000-0000.I often get phone calls like that.

    --
    -Pizentios
  41. Tracing the call by LaminatorX · · Score: 1

    If they look within 24 hours or so, the phone companies should be able to trace the call to the actual circuit from which it originated, using the underlying codes rather than the ANI presented for Caller ID.

    The hard part is getting the people who have the power to actually do that for you involved.

  42. duh by hrieke · · Score: 1

    Contact the Boston Globe and Boston Herald

    --
    III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
  43. Not well intending! by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "She's terrified. Some well-intending anti-telemarketing folks have posted her address on the 'net as well. "
    Welcome to vigilante justice. I wonder how many folks on slashdot think that posting peoples address like this on the Internet is a good idea?
    Well I am sure that if it was a real scammer then it would be okay...
    Until you make a mistake.
    Call the police, then the news, then your elected reps...
    They need to hunt these idiots down.
    Both the scammers and the ones that are calling this lady.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  44. if no one else can help... by viridari · · Score: 1

    ...and if you can find them, maybe you can hire the A-Team.

  45. Lack of needed law by Skapare · · Score: 1

    What is needed is a law that applies to the telcos. It should require them to do the following in their telephone network. When a call is being established from a source that provides its own caller ID info (e.g. a customer phone switch), then the telco switch should do a lookup of the provided number against the list of numbers assigned to the customer connected through the circuit to that switch. If it is not in the list, the call is not completed. No circuit is allowed to be connected to a switch unless the phone number list is available for it, or it comes from another telco. There would be certain exemptions for government law enforcement and intelligence operations.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  46. Call the credit card company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone has to have had some money taken from them through the credit card system. Maybe you can get some help there as the credit card company is probably out a fairly large amount of money. Just another way to attack the problem. The credit card company may want to have her phone number for a while. BTW these people kill me. I answered one of their stupid calls one day and they asked ME which of my vehicles warranty was about to expire. I said I didn't know I have 12 (actually true but most are VERY old motorcycles). I found it kind of humorous that they needed ask me which vehicle they were trying to scam me on!

  47. Lawyer. by Internet+Ronin · · Score: 1

    Call a Lawyer.

    It should be the first stop. Not that we're not all impressed by "anonymous reader's" efforts to help, but who is he and what is he going to do to help?

    An attorney, which can often provide a free consultation on the subject (especially if they are the family attorney), could give the legal or civil remedies far better than the knowledgeable, yet removed and politically-big-talking-limited-action afforded by Slashdot readers. Seriously. The post in and of itself *asks* for legal advice that this community is not qualified to give. More to the point, if the Sladshdot community gives bad advice, you can't exactly hold them accountable. An attorney would have a fiduciary duty to help the client resolve the problem, and could be held accountable (via malpractice) for the advice given.

    I find it difficult to believe that the authorities won't do anything. Far too often this demographic is willing to believe authorities use every tip and trick to circumvent civil liberties to get an arrest, but no they are so quick to believe they won't pursue something? Perhaps FBI lacks jurisdiction. Perhaps start with the sheriff's office before calling the FBI. Or public safety. Or state police. But most importantly CALL A LAWYER. Especially if she's unwilling to change her number.

    1. Re:Lawyer. by caluml · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As a bemused observer from the UK, it seems strange to me that two of the methods offered here are "contact the media", or "get a lawyer".
      I leave it to others to decide what this says about the US.

    2. Re:Lawyer. by ScottFree2600 · · Score: 1

      Everything here is political. To get anybody to do their job, you must shame them publicly or provide them an opportunity to look good in the press. Most lawyers are too techno-phobic to understand even a simple case like this one, and it's bad laws that make this kind of thing possible.

    3. Re:Lawyer. by Internet+Ronin · · Score: 1

      I choose to decide what it says about your understanding of the American legal system, and the normative function of American lawyers: that is to say, they are thought to solve problems, and not necessarily through litigation (despite what you may see on television...) Not to denigrate your bemusement, of course, but our attorneys are, ideally, not just used when it's time to sue a major corporation. There is however confirmation bias. It's not exactly newsworthy to find out that a local attorney settled a property dispute between two neighbors in an amicable way that didn't require a public showdown in a courtroom. As a bemused observer from the US, it seems strange to me that you don't see attorneys as able to solve problems. I'll leave it to others to decide what this says about the UK... ;-)

    4. Re:Lawyer. by iangoldby · · Score: 1

      As a bemused observer from the US, it seems strange to me that you don't see attorneys as able to solve problems. I'll leave it to others to decide what this says...

      That either:
      a) you've never had anything to do with lawyers
      b) you are a lawyer? ;-)

    5. Re:Lawyer. by caluml · · Score: 1

      No - of course lawyers can solve things. It's just strange how readily Americans use them. We're starting to get into the litigation-culture here though - especially when accidents happen. 10 years ago, if you tripped over something, and broke your ankle, you'd probably say "What a fool I was for not looking", and hobble around for a few weeks. Now, you'd be on the phone, trying to sue someone.
      The real WTF is that there should be some government agency that sorts things like this out for you. If someone assaults you, you expect the police (government agency) to investigate, and try and sort it out. You don't have to pay for your own investigation, or go to the media to drum up a campaign. Why should this "assault via phone" be any different? It seems that the "money is god" attitude over there gets in the way of "make people's lives better" - which is ultimately what society is for - why we live together, and exchange services and goods.

    6. Re:Lawyer. by dukieduke · · Score: 1

      I leave it to others to decide what this says about the US

      Shouldn't this post have been moderated funny/flamebait instead of interesting? Did we get any indication of how this would have been handled differently in the UK? Even the poster had no idea, as he/she certainly can't spell that simple procedure out. He/she leaves it up to you to fill in the blanks by invite. I am all for rational discourse, but this comment is neither rational nor is it a discourse on the subject. It is certainly not worth being moderated interesting.

    7. Re:Lawyer. by Internet+Ronin · · Score: 1

      Law student.

      Close enough I suppose ;-)
      Let me put it this way, we're trained, up front (we spent an entire week, away from classes) to help people with problems. Obviously, your mileage may vary, but at their core, lawyers are meant to be problem solvers. While the contingency fee and the rise of Tort Law (see the King of Torts, Joe Jamail) have made it 'profitable' for many attorneys to litigate as much as possible, many attorneys are NOT paid for that purpose, and in fact many get paid significant amounts of money not to litigate.

      That lawyers often don't simply solve the problems is a problem with the individuals themselves. The normative standards of the profession seek to promote precisely that goal (helping people with problems), and that so many don't should be a testament to the person, not the profession.

    8. Re:Lawyer. by Internet+Ronin · · Score: 1

      And I think that's totally fair, I suppose I just don't believe that the anonymous poster of this has gone through the proper channels. If he hasn't contacted the local authorities it makes little sense for the FBI to be involved, when their jurisdiction is expressly limited by the US Constitution. I think that he'd get a response if he went through the local authorities, and maybe even whatever state-sanctioned investigative body exists there (in Georgia, we have the GBI) but the FBI's not likely the best starting point. Kind of like working in a large corporation and sending an e-mail to the CEO because a co-worker is agitating you... Probably not the best analogy, but you can at least see some plausible reason (I hope) as to why the FBI isn't the best starting point, and there is no evidence of an appropriate starting point given. Nor is there an appeal to anyone who would know something about the law and how to proceed, but rather an open appeal to the Slashdot crowd.

    9. Re:Lawyer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would you propose? It's gotten to the point where those are our only two options anymore. Companies care not about how we feel. They take our money, then brush aside issues that are clearly of their domain as something we need to address ourselves.

      It's bullshit. Yeah, we've been forced to become litigious for sure. And it's gotten way out of hand, but on the same token, we're usually left with no other recourse.

      I'd say that the two suggestions aren't because of some one tracked mind that the "typical" American has, so much as it's a direct result of companies and the assholes that run them, not doing their god damn job.

      I'd say that they'd be without a job without us, but there are so many people that put up with this bullshit, that things like boycotting, and taking "personal" action just doesn't cut it.

      It's effectively sitting on your hands, hoping that things will just work themselves out.

      As you can tell from afar, that hasn't worked out so well for us.

    10. Re:Lawyer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being what I would like to think of as one of the more level headed people in the US, here's a little bit of background as to why people are so pissed off about these companies.

      They will keep calling. They will hang up on you when you ask for information like the company they are calling from, their name, their supervisor, etc. They skirt the telemarketing laws by not letting you state to take you off their list by hanging up midsentence. They are very difficult to trace and VERY annoying, oftentimes calling multiple times in a day.

    11. Re:Lawyer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately there is also other advise from obvious telecom individuals.. giving those that tend to frequent /. for the geekier side of things options to either nod our heads in agreement to or terms to google for.

    12. Re:Lawyer. by iangoldby · · Score: 1

      Sorry, it was a cheap joke at an easy target.

      It's always people that are the problem. Football hooligans, religious extremists, politicians who have lost their sense of principle...

  48. i see by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    so you believed that nasty old scammer's story, huh?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  49. Challenge to slashdotters: We can kill this by ScottFree2600 · · Score: 1

    I wondered when this was going to happen! I take care of a PBX with about 600 numbers on it and we get calls from these same creeps daily. When you try to find out who they are they just hang up on you. I have three active complaints with the FCC on these people. Usually, they spoof the number of some poor individual who is always listed in the phone book, always with the address, usually in some backwater town and the number is recently disconnected. I suspect that the listing is to help avoid blacklists or filtering (it works with us). The company is a service bureau that produces "leads" for several products including the car warranty fraudsters, an alarm company, a directTV dealer and a credit card company. They ignore the do not call list. The warranty people are the most persistent and the sleaziest, as they try to trick people into believing that they have an existing business relationship with them. This has been going on for months and will take a serious effort to get these guys busted, are slashdotters up to the task? Somebody will have to become an actual "lead" for them and collect some information that the FTC and FCC can use to find them. Getting the media on board will ensure the attention of the government agencies, who each will want to take the credit for stopping this once they "see the cameras". The story here is perfect for her local TV station's investigative team "Local woman gets thousands of calls from angry public because of fraudulent telemarketing company!". People hate fraud and telemarketers. These lead generation companies do the dirty work and keep "reputable" firms hands clean of wrongdoing by providing another layer of anonymity and making it almost hopeless to attempt to pursue the bad guys, but somebody has to get the customers money and to do that requires piercing that vail. The next phase of this will be when these kinds of losers start calling via VOIP from overseas. The key is to identify these people and more importantly, their customers! Please help!

    1. Re:Challenge to slashdotters: We can kill this by RpiMatty · · Score: 1

      In the past couple of months i've gotten 2 car warranty calls, and 3 or 4 direct TV offers.
      Each time I look up the caller ID on www.whocalled.us there are many other complaints about it being the warranty scam or direct tv offer.
      One time someone went so far as to post the name of the guy who the phone was registered too. Poor guy, this company was obviously faking the caller ID when they made their calls.
      I looked up the guy in a phone book, and he had 2 numbers listed, I assumed he needed to change the first number after getting harassing calls from angry people who received telemarketing calls.

    2. Re:Challenge to slashdotters: We can kill this by ScottFree2600 · · Score: 1

      What happens is that people google the "calling number" and get links to "whocalledus" or similar, but they also get the listing of the poor victim, though usually it's a recently disconnected number. I'm not sure whether the number is disconnected before the creeps "use" it or if it was already disconnected. The behavior described suggests that they just pick a number out of the sky that shows up in google with an address that looks legit. I have call logs (CDR's) that go back for months that show the pattern that they use. That's how I know it. Oh, that and the MF'rs call on my cell phone all the time, over and over. Why do we have to have telemarketing AT ALL? Who does it help? This won't stop until that whole business is shut down. They've proven that they have no respect for individuals or the law. I'm a little concerned about how the people here have determined that it's Digitcom in LA, though it might well be.

  50. Re:Revenge I called the FBI and suggested that by davidsyes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    and told others what i did and surmised later that i don't know HOW close i was to being potentially arrested.

    See, i'd been ripped off, losing a sizable chunk of money by a scammer in 2001/2002. I was laid off, had a mortgage, was desperate, and when you've been unhirable for almost a year, and burning down your vested stocks because some CEO got a bonus to lay you off when that bonus (several $10s of millions from what i heard) could have kept me and others employed for a few more months), your world starts to implode.

    So, i gambled (and lost) some $700 on an asshole who made a dumbass out of me. He promised (IIRC in writing as well as verbally) to return my investment if in 30 days (or so) i wanted to cancel my involvement. He dragged my ass out for weeks past that time, and then I called the FBI. I suggested this guy, one Anthony Brown (who claimed to have contacts at Cisco and ohter places, and claimed he was having meetings at times at their Milpitas location), might be doing this in an interstate manner. I was told they couldn't do anything. The local police in the Sacramento & San Joaquin areas couldn't help either. I suggested to the FBI agent that if they or law enforcement couldn't help me that I should probably find some criminals who would not take kindly to being ripped off, and that I should make an appointment with Mr. Brown (if that was even his real name and real ID), and "steer" him toward some mob or gangster types who would probably also not know Brown was a bottom-feeding piece of scum about to meet his Hell on Earth. I actually wanted BLOOD. I wanted to KILL that m'f'r, as $700 was a serious amount of money to take, STEAL, from someone whose world was already on fire. So, if he actually took their money, and then fucked THEM, he'd be sorry he ever met me or them.

    The FBI agent responded, "You're calling the *FBI* with a question like THAT?" Then he paused, giving me a hint i better hang up.

    I hung up. Later, friends and family helped me out a little more, but it is a shame that vigilantism is/can be illegal.

    My advice: If your world is on fire and you get involved with anybody who is going to get money from you, get their fingerprints off a restaurant glass, a writing pin from which you can lift the prints with cello tape, or something. Make him/her sign YOUR documents that their ass is voluntarily on a hook to YOU since their exploiting your pitiful situation. But, then if you're that smart, you might not be in my "hindsight is 20/20" situation.

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  51. Explain this to me by Ziest · · Score: 1

    My knowledge of phone technology is limited but could someone explain why we don't have a reliable traceback method for the phone system?

    --
    Another day closer to redwood heaven
    1. Re:Explain this to me by FewClues · · Score: 1

      We do have - *69 will redial the number that just called you. But the problem is that the people using her number to spoof their ID aren't calling her - they are calling all over the planet - and the people who got scammed are calling this lady. A call screener is the answer.

    2. Re:Explain this to me by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      We do - It's just that the Phone companies don't like using it because it is time consuming

      It is very simple faking your CLI should be illegal, If you don't own the number you are claiming to be then it is fraud.... (sending nothing, or an alternative number is fine)

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    3. Re:Explain this to me by RoboRay · · Score: 2, Informative

      The same reason we don't have a reliable traceback system for email...

      Security wasn't a concern when it was designed.

    4. Re:Explain this to me by quetwo · · Score: 1

      We do, it is just not exposed to consumers. The phone company has VERY good records for this stuff.

  52. write your congresscritter by Surt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They love to make themselves look good with stuff like this. They'll get the FBI hopping. Caller ID spoofing is fraud, and it's prosecutable.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  53. The Internet by cdrguru · · Score: 1

    Well, now that her address is posted, she better think about moving. Who did it? Nobody will ever admit to it and even if someone did, there is this little thing called the 1st Amendment. Publishing someone's address so they can be harrassed is not illegal.

    As to finding the people using her phone number for Caller ID, good luck. You need to understand that you aren't receiving those phone calls. So there is nothing to trace. You aren't going to get anyone to track down the phone records of someone that calls because of the Caller ID - that would be a violation of their privacy.

    I'd say you either trust in the good nature of all of the people on the Internet or plan on helping your nice old lady friend move. Now that she is linked with telemarketing and her address is published you can assume someone, somewhere with a militant attitude towards telemarketers will follow up on this address. Sure, after they burn her house down she might be able to have them arrested for arson.

  54. Can't be traced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I can't believe what I am reading. A lot of people are talking about different methods the FBI should use to trace these people. Some people are saying take this to the media to shame those agencies into doing something. THEY CAN'T. There are two methods for caller ID spoofing. There is one method that is completely untraceable. This lady is SOL. The reason why those agencies haven't taken action is because they CAN'T. Her best option is to change her number.

    1. Re:Can't be traced by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      These people are selling something. In order to get the money from the people they are calling those people need to be able to contact them. It should be trivial to find out who they are by the contact information that they leave. If they don't leave contact information, there are still ways to track the money.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    2. Re:Can't be traced by TheSeventh · · Score: 1

      Well, then why don't we all just start some of these corrupt, fraudulent businesses because it'll be impossible to catch us?

      We break the law, cover our tracks, and presto, instant riches with no repercussions or consequences!!!

      --
      Just because you're paranoid, it doesn't mean that they're not out to get you.
  55. Shout by ledow · · Score: 1

    Rule 1: There's no problem so big that it can't be solved by shouting. (In fact, it's pointless numbering it because it's the ONLY rule when dealing with anybody).

      - Shout at the phone company.
      - Shout at the local police (bugger the FBI, the police would be my first port of call)
      - Shout at the FBI.

    They will all tell you there is "nothing" they can do, until you start causing a fuss and they actually SEE what the problem is and start dealing with it. If they don't, then you invoke corollary A...

      - Shout to the press, and let them amplify your voice.

    Get an item in your local paper (at least), raising the parts about little old lady, death threats, innocent party... see how long it takes the phone company to do something then.

    I'd be very surprised if you'd have to go that far. Many's the time that I've been told that there's "nothing" that can be done by a company. Every time, I've got a resolution without even having to hang up the phone (don't fall for the "we'll get someone to call you back"). You just insist they sort the problem out - the first person on the phone will NEVER be able to do anything but there is ALWAYS someone that can, will and does as part of their job.

    Case in point - one winter our pre-pay gas card (that powers all our heating) stopped working and the company told me there was "nothing" that could be done. I'd have to wait X days for a replacement to turn up and pay £8 for it. I start shouting. Nothing offensive, a bit rude at worst and I keep drumming it into the person... "If YOU can't help me, get me someone who can." I wasn't taking no for an answer. Three people and an hour later (after refusing to hang up and wait for them to resolve the problem, be transferred etc.) and I get to someone who not only arranges for a replacement card there but then gets on the phone to the local store (who charge the gas-cards but are otherwise just ordinary stores), TELLS THEM TO STAY OPEN PAST CLOSING TIME until I arrive, and they will give me a new card (with free credit) which I'm supposed to pay £8 for but he makes them waive it. Meanwhile, he gives me his direct phone number, directions to the shop, the shop's phone number and the name of the person he spoke to. He tells me to call him in ten minutes to tell him whether or not I have the card. I run out to the shop, get the card, call him back (and he answers, so he WAS genuine), thank him. Two days later, a small cheque arrives in the post for the hassle.

    Funny, considering according to the first person I spoke to "nobody" could do anything, there was "nothing" that could possibly be done, "even my supervisor can't do that, sir". Absolute tripe. Shout.

    I've had this about once a month for the past five years with banks, shops, call-centres, even furniture stores etc. It's ALWAYS the same story. "My supervisor isn't here." (CRAP!) "Nobody can do that." (Rubbish). "You'll have to call back when X is around." (Tripe). Cause a fuss, don't let them hang up on you, get through to the person who CAN do things (there's ALWAYS one). If all else fails, write a really nasty letter at the same time as you get the local press involved (both bother to threaten - just do it) mentioning that little fact. See how long it takes for a very nice man at the phone company to change her number for free and slip her a small cheque to keep her quiet.

    1. Re:Shout by KillerBob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You've never worked in customer service, have you? In call centres especially, that little hold button is so useful when a caller starts getting abusive, as is the release button. I have released calls before when customers start shouting at me for no reason. One even took it upon himself to sue the company, and was ordered to pay our legal fees when our lawyers played the recording before the courts.

      And if you do it in person, you need to understand that the newspaper is private property and they can have you escorted off the premises if you get abusive, and they can have you arrested if you don't cooperate with that. And the FBI and police are both law enforcement agencies, and they can throw you in jail for being abusive to them.

      You get much farther when dealing with customer service if you are reasonable. A wise man once said... speak softly and carry a big stick. Be reasonable. Don't be abusive. And if you can't get anywhere over the phone, send a letter. Around here, at least, corporations are required, by law, to provide their mailing address when asked.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    2. Re:Shout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never worked in customer service, have you? In call centres especially, that little hold button is so useful when a caller starts getting abusive, as is the release button.

      You are absolutely right, but the famous phrase, repeated ad-nauseum is NEVER a reason an agent at a call centre can use to hang up on a call:

      "If you're not able to resolve this issue, I'd like to speak with someone who can. For example, your manager or supervisor."

      Don't get angry or shout. Just keep saying "I'm not satisfied with that resolution. If you cannot meet my demands, I request you transfer me to someone who can." I've gotten up the chain to an actual manager of the call centre doing that before. Took over 2 hours, talking to a half dozen people, all of whom probably wanted to shoot themselves after my call. Sorry about that, but if your company sucks, leave. I know how to play the game well enough to prevent you from hanging up, and to make you (as the agent) give me whatever you possibly can to resolve the problem.

      And no, nobody could hang up on my call. The manager didn't actually resolve the problem, sadly, but a small claims court notice to their lawyer did (Out of court settlement the same day they received the court notice, I might add! They included filing fees! One supposes their lawyers know the law better than the call centre manager). ;-)

    3. Re:Shout by ledow · · Score: 1

      Loud / determined / persistent / annoyed / demanding does not mean abusive.

      This is for AFTER you've been reasonable. Reasonable was phoning the phone company asking for help. The OP can phone again and be reasonable but the chances are he will get every one of the answers in my post. It's only when you start causing a fuss that you get put through. Be reasonable FIRST, by all means (I work that way, because sometimes you hit a nice-but-useless person who will put you straight through to a useful person immediately).

      "Shouting" isn't being abusive. I may have over-exaggerated the fact but basically you don't take no for an answer and keep on and on and on until the poor person on the other end of the phone gives in and gets their supervisor on the line (I actually *know* for a fact that a lot of call centres in my country are NOT allowed to hang up on the customer as a matter of company policy - the customer must hang up first... it causes a lot of problems in a lot of telesales places, and is sometimes an "unofficial" but still pretty prevelant practice).

      If you were to hang up on me (and, like I say, I've done this no end of times to just about every company I've ever had to deal with, at home and at work, and never had anyone even suggest they might hang up on me, let alone actually do it, and my record is currently a 2 hour phone call to get put through to someone... and that was on their "sales" line because their customer service line were too busy to answer) then not only would I be ringing back, but I would have had your name in the first five seconds of the phone call and you WOULD have made things worse for yourself. Some places don't care about such complaints, but I've never dealt with such places.

      I have had a twenty-minute conversation with a customer services agent where I said nothing but "Put me through to your supervisor please" repeatedly after I was told "There is nothing anyone here can do." Twenty minutes later, I'm talking to the supervisor (who, I was told "is on holiday", "isn't in the building", "can't help you", "is in a meeting for the next three hours", etc.) and have the problem fixed the way **I** originally wanted within SECONDS.

      Maybe it's a national thing but in my experience, corporations basically ignore letters that don't have an official letterhead or the word "summons" on them, even sent recorded-delivery. You get a half-arsed, useless reply that doesn't reply to any of your actual questions. And it takes MONTHS for anything to happen. And if anything DOES happen, you'll get a phone call from that same person "who can" to resolve the situation before any written reply could ever appear.

      In the UK, companies are required to give their company address when asked (and there is even a listing from "Companies House" for any company if they don't give it to you). I've had that request refused outright by large companies at least four times - you get a phone number if you're lucky. And yes, I complained AGAIN about that fact at the first opportunity. I was once assured by a head of customer service that, by English law, I couldn't legally return goods for a refund/replacement when they were faulty without a receipt (which is so incorrect, it's laughable). People on phones DO NOT play by the rules unless you cause a fuss, no matter what they might be required to do, no matter how big and fancy the company is. Letters usually do get some kind of half-arsed, legal minimum reply if at all (and I *have* had recorded-delivery letters asking for answers to other more-than-reasonable and legally-required information go unreplied-to).

      But people on phones, when "shouted" at enough, will get you instantaneous feedback on your problems. I get a hundred times the result on a phone than I ever have by letter. I get a hundred times that result again in-person, but I don't do that for anything that isn't worth it. I've never had anyone complain about MY treatment of the agents in question.

      Oh, and if you are in the US, the US really nee

    4. Re:Shout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you called my company and behaved that way, you'd get hung up on. It works well for us, long calls like that cost us more profit than most customers provide. If you're polite, we'll do you small favors. If you aren't, we will behave strictly as our policies dictate. If you fail to accept that, we'll terminate the call, and if it continues to be a problem, we'll terminate all business with you. There's nothing you can do about it, except behave in a reasonable manner.

      Most people don't have monthly customer service issues. The problem might be you, not them.

    5. Re:Shout by KillerBob · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe it's a national thing but in my experience, corporations basically ignore letters that don't have an official letterhead or the word "summons" on them, even sent recorded-delivery. You get a half-arsed, useless reply that doesn't reply to any of your actual questions. And it takes MONTHS for anything to happen. And if anything DOES happen, you'll get a phone call from that same person "who can" to resolve the situation before any written reply could ever appear.

      Varies by corporation. Part of my job is to read those letters. I read every single one of them, in English and in French, that gets sent to us, and I decide what, if any, action is needed on them. And I see too it that when action is required, it gets done. That means ensuring that customers are given the service to which they have a right, but it also means protecting the company's interests... generally, as long as your request is reasonable, I have a lot of authority to help you. But there has to be some compromise... if you're demanding that I replace your product years after you bought it because you dropped it off a balcony, and you're threatening to sue us if I don't (a request I got last week), my response is going to be an invitation to bring it on.

      And I know for a fact that everybody who answers the phone knows exactly where to find information like our corporate mailing address so they can give it with minimum fuss when asked. Hell, it's on the transfer list of extensions we give to our operators, so you can call our toll free, press zero, and the first person who answers can give you our mailing address without any fuss. They've got our Canada head office contact information in Toronto, and they've got our Global head office contact information in the states, and they know exactly where to go on the intranet to find addresses for any of our global offices: it's part of their initial training.

      But people on phones, when "shouted" at enough, will get you instantaneous feedback on your problems. I get a hundred times the result on a phone than I ever have by letter. I get a hundred times that result again in-person, but I don't do that for anything that isn't worth it. I've never had anyone complain about MY treatment of the agents in question.

      That, again, varies by company. If you're not getting anywhere on the phone, you have a right to be frustrated. You're even entitled to raise your voice. But if you start to take those frustrations out on the person who's trying to help you as best they can, then our customer care, technical support, and sales teams are allowed to hang up on you. They are told, point blank, that they're not being paid to take abuse, and if they feel that you're abusing them, then it's at their discretion whether or not you've crossed the line. You get one warning, and then you get disconnected. And I've never seen anybody get fired over it... I've actually only ever seen one person get coaching on his call mangement skills. Management is there to protect the employees first. I've been with the company quite some time... I started in the sales department, and now I'm in customer relations. If you are wasting my time, and we are getting nowhere, I will tell you point blank: "these are your options, which do you want me to do?" If you don't take one of the options given, then I will tell you that at this point, there is nothing more to discuss, and I will hang up on you. We've actually severed business relations with customers rather than reverse my decisions on matters like that, too, at which point if they ever call again, they will be told "We choose not to do business with you, have a nice day." and be hung up on.

      So be very careful who you yell at, because there are consequences.

      Oh, and if you are in the US, the US really need to sort your law enforcement out. Our police would only bother to arrest you if you actually threatened violence or hit someone. Shouting isn't against the law. They woul

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    6. Re:Shout by ledow · · Score: 1

      Oh, please do hang up and refuse my business. It actually helps me. I've never had a company do that and I deal with SO many. I once had one threaten too, but then he remembered that one of my first questions was to get his name subtly. Please do hang up, it makes my purchasing decisions *so* much easier (it's part of my job). Long calls cost you money. Guess what? They cost me money and time too and they belong to me, rather than your company and so are much more precious. And irate customers who can't get a satisfactory resolution (even where required by law) and have to take things to more serious venues cost you more. The problem is not your irate customer here, it's the company.

      I'm always very careful to point out that it's the COMPANY I have a problem with, not the person the other end of the phone until that person does do something which they shouldn't do or vice versa. I've never had to ring back, in fact, I've never needed a second phone call (except in the case where the American supplier of my brother's latest PC purchase didn't deliver on time and we redialled the freefone number 487 times, I have the phone bill to prove it, to a "busy" line. We got through eventually, and with some shouting got the PC shipped out in that same hour, with a tracking number so we could check. The PC arrived the next morning. The company went bankrupt the next week. Luckily, neither of us bother with support contracts for personal PC's... That PC is still going strong. We only have it because we shouted - other customers weren't so lucky.).

      And if you think I'm just one of those pain-in-the-butt people who cause problems in order to shout at people, you're wrong. Every single occasion, it's been because of stupid circumstances beyond my control. I hate doing it - shouting at people is for crowd control and emergencies. People in work who've known me for years are shocked when they hear me in full flow because they don't expect it from me, but they admit it gets results.

      Household gas company (actually *British Gas*, the largest supplier in the UK and reknowned for poor customer service) - pre-pay smartcard failed mid-winter just after we'd moved into a new house, we didn't have the electricity switched on by then and because of local bylaws and the size of the house you can't heat it any other way. The card came with an "emergency" credit that lasted all of four hours. They would not provide a replacement card for "anything up to 7 working days, probably an asbolute minimum of 2 days". It was resolved in a matter of hours - MINUTES once through to the right person, who went above and beyond the call of duty to resolve the matter, got a wonderful letter of appraisal and probably got a raise. The circumstance was beyond my control, however. (We did switch gas companies though because I can't guarantee that I'll get hold of that same person if I have a problem in future. Ironically, we now get our gas from an electric company and our electric from a gas company.)

      Bank (which I have never had a customer relationship with) - decided to automatically fax me at home every 8 minutes the internal banking details of all their funds transfers repeatedly over the course of several hours. I don't have a fax machine at home, and the damn thing was on redial-on-fail. Telecoms company intervened (only after the described telephonic persuasion) because the call wasn't traceable via caller ID. I was about two minutes away from hooking up a fax/modem myself and receiving it and that would have been incredibly embarrassing for them.

      As it was, the telecoms company (eventually) captured the fax en-route, phoned the person in charge at the bank with a copy of the fax that they had tried to repeatedly send to me. Within minutes I had a telephone apology from the head of the bank, and was thanked for my "honesty" and was told that the information that was being faxed was highly-sensitive and was being sent to internal numbers with security PIN's that, when dialled externally, connected to

  56. Get her number changed. by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    Costs like 5 bucks. Not a huge deal.

  57. How to obtain actual caller ID using asterisk by hooshman · · Score: 3, Informative

    This probably won't help, since telemarketers probably wouldn't call VoIP DIDs, especially if they are doing sketchy stuff like this. However, if you're receiving their calls and happen to be using a SIP phone, this comment is for you. I don't know of how people would mask their caller ID on a normal land line. Of course people can get those caller ID spoof cards, but where are they calling when they call those numbers? Chances are, it's a VoIP service. If someone who has a SIP phone is called by these telemarketers, they may be able to retrieve their real caller ID. Unless the telemarketers really know what they're doing, they probably only changed the caller ID field in the SIP header, and didn't touch the P-Asserted-Identity field. Using asterisk, one can obtain the caller ID out of the P-Asserted-Identity field like this, before having the phone ring of course: exten => s,1,Set(passertedid=${SIP_HEADER(P-Asserted-Identity)}) exten => s,2,Set(CALLERID(all)=${CUT(passertedid,@,1):5})

  58. Contact the FTC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Technically, abuses like this fall under the Federal Trade Commission. They have a website for taking complaints: https://www.ftccomplaintassistant.gov/

    Unfortunately, her best option is still to get a new phone number.
    There has been a recent rash of telemarketing calls particularly to cell phones using spoofed caller ID. The calls are being made from spoofed caller IDs because it is illegal to make telemarketing calls to cell phones and whoever is doing this does not want to be easily traced.

  59. WE NEED TO NAIL CELL CARRIERS by Bob_Who · · Score: 2, Informative

    In my experience, everything about cellular is a rip off. They need to be regulated by consumer advocacy and engineers - not payola politicians. If we pass laws that make them PAY I bet they'll figure out how to handle all those FREE MINUTES before its streamed to the Fed's data mine. Face it people, Cellular somehow accounts for every dollar that they steal from us on 2 year "contracts". If they have to pay, then they'll fix it, yesterday! Lets fire up some torches angry villagers !!

  60. i have the reverse problem by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Funny

    little old ladies are always calling me

    no seriously. the best i can make out from the odd chats i've had with various little old ladies over the years is that my number was previously owned by a high end and antique pen dealership. that explains the demographics of the calls i get. an occasional little old man, sure, but mostly little old ladies make up the customer base for fine crafted pens

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i have the reverse problem by Notquitecajun · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a business opportunity. Did you ever look into it?

    2. Re:i have the reverse problem by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had to change phone numbers when switching from ISDN back to POTS way back when. The first number we got had been owned by a drug dealer, and we'd get collect calls from prison and people wanting a fix. That lasted for about a day. The next number we got had been the local Alcholics Anonymous chapter, and after a couple of bleary 2AM "if I don't quit drinking I think I might die" calls, we switched again. So far, so good.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    3. Re:i have the reverse problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We used to have a number in the office that was one digit off from the number of the local eye clinic. Apparently, that attracts the same demographic as fine crafted pens.

    4. Re:i have the reverse problem by IorDMUX · · Score: 1

      I used to have a similar problem, except that I received a great many calls from little old ladies... ... who only spoke Russian. Apparently, as I learned after the fact, my old land-line number was 1 digit away from a doctor who had many patients among the Russian immigrant population in my area.

      You'd be surprised how angry some of these callers would get when I would try to tell them (in English) that they had a wrong number. I learned what certainly appeared to be a few Russian curse words during that time.

      --
      >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
  61. Identity Theft? by Saliegh · · Score: 1

    Spoofing someones phone number seems less financially destructive than stealing their SSN or credit card numbers, but wouldn't this still qualify as stealing someone's unique, identifying number? And if it leads to death threats and harassment of an innocent citizen, I would think this would be the thing we actually have law enforcement for.

    --
    1368127 is prime!
  62. Easiest solution is what she wont do by Toll_Free · · Score: 1

    She should change her number, if it's really that bad.

    I mean, so you've had the same number for 50 years. How many people call you after 10 years you haven't heard from.

    YES, it's an inconvenience. BUT, it's easier than trying to push the feds or local LEO's into doing something

    Sometimes, doing what you don't want to do is the easiest thing, and the easiest way to solve the problem faced.

    --Toll_Free

  63. How does one spoof a Caller ID? by turnitover · · Score: 1

    And is it something done on the caller's end, or is it something in the system? I'm wondering because I've been getting some odd calls w/r/t Caller ID and I wonder if a friend is having me on... .

  64. Address and Phone of digitcom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    WEST LOS ANGELES
    12923 Venice Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90066
    (On Venice Blvd. between Lincoln and Beethoven,
    across the street from Venice High School)

    Phone (310) 358-7000
            (800) 464-5446
    Fax (310) 437-4105

    1. Re:Address and Phone of digitcom by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      I used to live about a block from there. It's probably little more than a mail drop. Tiny little suite with a 40 year old desk and a plastic potted plant and a pile of junk mail on the floor, I'd lay money on it. There are a lot of places like that in that seedy section of Mar Vista/Los Angeles. Crappy old 50's office suite buildings with baseball card wholesalers, direct mail scammers, and the like.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  65. An elected representative by David7 · · Score: 1

    This sounds like the kind of thing where an elected representative can really help. If the lady in question lives in the U.S., she might want to contact her U.S. Senator and her U.S. House Representative.

  66. While we're at it... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    I say, scorched Earth. Put ALL telemarketers and ALL snail mail spammers and ALL email spammers out of business.

    While we're at it, let's get rid of all those damn billboards that festoon every square inch of space everywhere, and plant trees instead.

    It is time for marketroids to realise that they do not have a god-given right to plaster their useless dreck across the entire landscape just so that they can make a fast buck. Douglas Adams was wrong when he painted telephone sanitisers and hairdressers as the most useless specimens of humanity. Marketroids plumb depths where even parking attendants barely mark the surface.

    1. Re:While we're at it... by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      As I recall, DNA did put advertising account executives on the Golgafrinchian "B" ark.

    2. Re:While we're at it... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Aha, I'd forgotten that. Been a couple of years since I read it last... ;-)

  67. Re:Revenge I called the FBI and suggested that by nizo · · Score: 1

    ...but it is a shame that vigilantism is/can be illegal.

    See the movie "The Star Chamber" for a good reason why it is illegal.

  68. Spoofing is done in the switch ... by Skapare · · Score: 1

    ... that larger businesses with lots of phone lines have connected via a trunk circuit to their telco (which doesn't vet the caller ID info against the numbers assigned to that customer).

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    1. Re:Spoofing is done in the switch ... by mschuyler · · Score: 1

      Qwest has a system called 'Caller ID with Privacy Plus' that slows this down. A robot intercepts calls as you described them and makes the caller go though a series of steps. They have to state their name, press 1, then the robot calls your number with a special double-ring. You answer and the robot tells you the name of the caller as stated, which you can accept or reject. Yeah, it's a bit of a pain, but it stops most all automated calls from call centers in their tracks.

      It also stops calls from overseas, where my daughter lives. She's resigned to going through the motions every time she calls, and 9 times out of 10 a double ring means she is calling.

      It's an additional $3.00 on top of the caller id charge, which is a total rip, but I'm very happy with the results and, to me, it's worth the money. I have a second line with no caller id, and the difference is very noticeable. I don't answer the other line, which is my fax and DSL, so it's not a problem for me. Both numbers are on the Do Not Call List.

      --
      How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    2. Re:Spoofing is done in the switch ... by Skapare · · Score: 1

      That's a different concept ... useful, but it doesn't prevent any false statements by the person doing the calling. It certainly can help against robot calls. But the original story is about calls that people are involved in, who refuse to reveal their true identity, and falsify the caller ID.

      What is wanted is validation of the caller ID info by a trusted party that would be in a position to know if it is correct or not. I see no reason to complete a call if the caller ID info is false under any circumstance (this would not apply to completing a call with no caller ID info provided).

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    3. Re:Spoofing is done in the switch ... by mschuyler · · Score: 1

      Excuse me for sharing, but I was responding specifically to this statement: ... that larger businesses with lots of phone lines have connected via a trunk circuit to their telco (which doesn't vet the caller ID info against the numbers assigned to that customer).

      Had I wanted to reply to the original statement I would have hit reply at that level.

      --
      How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  69. Bravo, Slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The banner ad for this article is for "SpoofCard" which enables you to "spoof your Called Id" and "be anyone you want to be".

    Nice.

  70. legal recourse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Send a certified letter to the state attorney general's office, the FBI office, the phone company, and the FCC. That's four copies of the same letter addressed to all four entities explaining the situation and asking them to fix it. Send it certified so someone has to sign for it.

    If they continue to do nothing, go to an attorney, have him send the same four letters with a cover letter of his stating that the matter will move to federal court for injunctive relief asking the court to order them to fix the situation if they can't seem to do so on their own. Given her age, you should be able find an attorney willing to give a pro bono hour for this.

    If they still continue to do nothing, file the complaint. It is, I believe, $350 to file the complaint plus the day to show-up and ask the judge for the order and for compensation for expenses. Again, finding a competent attorney to do this pro bono for the publicity benefit alone shouldn't be impossible. You may even get the court to waive the filing fee if she's on a fixed income.

  71. Just tell her to get her number changed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Ask the phone company for something nondescript, like 867-5309.

  72. Yeah Bogus. You! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The FBI can certainly help, that's bogus. The phone company can certainly help, that's bogus as well. The phone company knows from which carrier the call came from and so on and so forth until they can pin down the offending carrier.

    What's that supposed to mean?

    The FBI, phone carriers and local law enforcement don't give shit! They'll take a report and send you on your way!

    1. Re:Yeah Bogus. You! by TUOggy · · Score: 1

      That's when you take it to the legislators and the media!!! That will light a fire under their asses!

  73. How to track them down by RecycledElectrons · · Score: 1, Troll

    Option 1: Live with it.

    Option 2: Find out from someone who paid them what address the company is at - get it from a credit card dispute. Then, walk in and kill them.

    Andy Out!

  74. Social Engineering vs Technical Engineering by taoofmike · · Score: 1

    Calling the Media will mean nothing unless this "company" has a conscious. It will simply tell them "we are on to you and now feel the wraith of mass guilt!". Perhaps what needs to be done is to contact every spoof company you can find out there and ask for there records stating you are investigating this most hannus crime. However, if both are deployed perhaps you could get an even better result. Just a theory...

    1. Re:Social Engineering vs Technical Engineering by compro01 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The people suggesting "call the media" are not wanting the media on the scammers. They're wanting the media on the law enforcement officials so they will go after the scammers.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  75. As requested: technological solution by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_number_identification

    Get one of the bastards to call someone with equipment to get the ANI code and the rest is Slashdot fun.

    --
    Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
  76. get rid of angry callers with screening machine by FewClues · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since the spoofed calls are not coming to her number the records will only show the angry folks who are getting scammed. It is their phone records that will indicate the source. Purchase a call screening device ($60) and block calls from out of the area or any unrecognized number. Most machines allow you to use both a white list of good numbers a priority list of close friends and a rejection list that would include anyone else. We were getting a lot of drunks calling late at night waking us in a panic. We put a "caller ID with ring control" on the line and have not had a single unknown phone call. We have not had anyone we white listed blocked. So its a cheap answer to the problem.

    1. Re:get rid of angry callers with screening machine by UmIsThisThingOn · · Score: 1

      ... We were getting a lot of drunks calling late at night waking us in a panic. ...

      That is one of the funniest statements I have read today.

    2. Re:get rid of angry callers with screening machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blocking the calls won't keep someone from getting her address and doing something bad to her or her belongings. In fact it might just make them more angry.

  77. Pay it forward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would forward my phone number the nearest local police station. The phone company would surely disconnect that forward, but a few would get through. Sometimes simply presenting your case isn't enough.

  78. Phone logs and the FTC by killmofasta · · Score: 5, Informative

    Dosn't matter a bit FBI? CIA? RGB? TFB?

    If she was getting call backs, she should tell EVERY ONE WHO CALLS, AWS are scammers, and they should register with the FTC: and START Signed and dated PHONE LOGS. Every one I hear gets these phone calls, I show them the origional post card that started it all, and my phone log. I have clued in about 20 people, and we have filed over 15 reports for illegal telemarketing contact, i.e. Dont call EVER, and ... they ... call @ $500 per complaint.

    http://www.ftc.gov/

    Scammer name:
    Automotive Warranty Solutions
    6501 congress ave, ste 140, boca raton, fl 33487
    877-700-5880,
    Call their 800 number, and ask to be put on their do not call list. ( just everone call plz )

    This is a Attorney General who is taking this problem seriously. ( Note: California and Florida are probibly NOT ):

    http://www.ct.gov/AG/cwp/view.asp?A=2795&Q=411422

    a blogger who did a lot of flatfoot work:

    http://www.markturner.net/2007/11/08/car-warranty-scam-continued/

    Remember: REMEMBER! Documented phone logs make diffrence. If you can document DNC and the call back time and date. Give them a call and get on their DNC list ANYWAY. So when they do call...

    1. Re:Phone logs and the FTC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had good luck with the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs, which oversees Florida's DNC list. A complaint I filed online about a vacation trip scammer making phone calls to my DNC-listed cell phone was eventually prosecuted, and I was notified in a personal letter from the state's attorney prosecuting the case.

      http://app1.800helpfla.com/cswebcomplaints/DNCComplaint.aspx

    2. Re:Phone logs and the FTC by killmofasta · · Score: 1

      WOW! Thanks! Mod parent! Mod Parent! Mod Parent! Thanks for the info! Really!

  79. This seems to be a growing problem by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 1

    I have a land line here that gets 4-5 different auto-calls a day even though it's be on that Do Not Call list for a year. I usually leave the phone off the hook after answering to waste their time. When I call the numbers back they either block the call at their pbx with a message or are disconnected and obviously forged. I'm even getting them on my cell, including mal-formed numbers from what should be New Brunswick and Puerto Rico. Fuckin Scammers

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
  80. law suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm actually working with a lawyer on these people. I need to file a law suit sometime this week in order to get the subpoenas I need to begin tracking them down.

    It's going to take awhile, but I'm certain with a little bit of work it will happen.

  81. best approach by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the Feds can't or won't handle it, what's the best approach here?

    Continue advocating the phase out of the legacy telephone system with its unreliable caller id info. The ideal way this stuff should work, is that if the incoming connection request isn't OpenPGP-signed by someone you have some sort of WoT path to, then you don't know who it is.

    We've had the tech to solve The Big Authentication Problem for a couple decades now (thanks, Phil!). We just need to start using it, for voice, email, etc.

    Some well-intending anti-telemarketing folks have posted her address on the 'net as well.

    You are giving them too much credit. Caller ID is widely known, even to many laymen now, to be unreliable. (And someone who makes a point of going after scammers has little excuse for being behind the curve on this.) They don't really have strong reason to believe she is the scammer. To do such a thing without checking their facts is irresponsible and possibly libelous. I wouldn't sugarcoat their actions.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  82. Office of the State Attorney General by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They tend to be very conscious of consumer issues and it is their job to look after the citizens & businesses in their state. While the scammers are likely out of state, the Office could initiate legal action against them. Also bring the media as others have said - something mainstream like the local news.

  83. Caller ID spoofing - ILLEGAL by Phil_at_EvilNET · · Score: 5, Informative

    The US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation passed S. 704, a bill that would make it a crime to spoof caller ID.

    Dubbed the "Truth in Caller ID Act of 2007," the bill would outlaw causing "any caller identification service to transmit misleading or inaccurate caller identification information" via "any telecommunications service or IP-enabled voice service." Law enforcement is exempted from the rule.

    Specifically these sections:

    SEC. 2. PROHIBITION REGARDING MANIPULATION OF CALLER IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION.

    Section 227 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 227) is amended -

    (1) by redesignating subsections (e), (f), and (g) as subsections (f), (g), and (h), respectively; and

    (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection:

    `(e) Prohibition on Provision of Inaccurate Caller Identification Information. -

    `(1) IN GENERAL - It shall be unlawful for any person within the United States, in connection with any telecommunications service or IP-enabled voice service, to cause any caller identification service to knowingly transmit misleading or inaccurate caller identification information with the intent to defraud, cause harm, or wrongfully obtain anything of value, unless such transmission is exempted pursuant to paragraph (3)(B).

    `(3) REGULATIONS -

    `(A) IN GENERAL - Not later than 6 months after the enactment of this subsection, the Commission shall prescribe regulations to implement this subsection.

    `(B) CONTENT OF REGULATIONS -

    `(i) IN GENERAL - The regulations required under subparagraph (A) shall include such exemptions from the prohibition under paragraph (1) as the Commission determines is appropriate.

    `(ii) SPECIFIC EXEMPTION FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OR COURT ORDERS - The regulations required under subparagraph (A) shall exempt from the prohibition under paragraph (1) transmissions in connection with -

    `(I) any authorized activity of a law enforcement agency; or

    `(II) a court order that specifically authorizes the use of caller identification manipulation.

    Law enforcement is negligent if they fail to take action. IMO - If the Law doesn't work, the local newspaper and/or television station might get the ball rolling.

    --
    To avoid corruption, one must remain dishonest.
    1. Re:Caller ID spoofing - ILLEGAL by compro01 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unless I'm getting this mixed up with another one, according to govtrack, this never got voted on in the Senate, nor did its companion, HR 251, which was passed in the House, so it's not actually illegal.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    2. Re:Caller ID spoofing - ILLEGAL by photomonkey · · Score: 1

      They can pass as many laws as they want. Passing a law like this sends some positive PR to whatever junior Congressman put forth the bill.

      Problem is that so many of these laws are unenforced/unenforceable.

      Until a lot of important people have been truly harmed by these scammers, no one will give two shits.

      --
      Message contains 1 attachment: spam.gif
    3. Re:Caller ID spoofing - ILLEGAL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This act has NOT been passed by the senate, only the house.

      http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-251

    4. Re:Caller ID spoofing - ILLEGAL by saizai · · Score: 1

      Only the House passed this, not the Senate. It is NOT LAW (yet). If you want it to be, go call your senator. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-251

      --
      http://s.ai - http://s.ai/foia - http://s.ai/tsa/legal - https://patreon.com/saizai
  84. SOLUTION by RJBeery · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm a marketing consultant and I've dealt with the auto warranty industry extensively. We (they) have recently started a new watch-dog group called the Automotive Warranty and Service Contract Association, and one of their purposes is to stop the "robo-calling" and caller ID spoofing. Have your friend send an email to Larry Hecker, Executive Director of AWSCA. His email is [his first name] at warrantybestpractices dot com. Good luck!

  85. Does she know the real scammers' identity? by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

    If she knows the real scammers' identity, she could simply let all calls from numbers she doesn't recognize go to voicemail. The voicemail message can say something to the effect of

    Thank you for calling grandma. If you are calling to complain about a car warranty solicitation that you received, you have the wrong number. Please hang up and call them directly at (XXX-YYY-ZZZZ) or file a complaint with your state's insurance regulator. All others may leave a message at the tone.

    Hopefully that will help.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  86. Private Investigator by ProzacPatient · · Score: 1

    One suggestion I have, with all other ideas exhausted, is to try using a private investigator.
    P.I.'s can dig up a lot of dirt that you could use to file formal charges, but unfortunately it could be costly.

  87. Some ideas by vinn · · Score: 2, Informative

    First off, I like the idea of intercepting this with an auto attendant, I think that's the simplest and most important thing you can do in the short term. I think you could ask your local telco if they can put an intercept message on the line - that should be completely possible. If not, look for some kind of device that will pick up, play back a recorded message, then pass the call on to the phone. A service like this would work well but costs money:

    http://www.americanvoicemail.com/autoattendant.html

    Or, you can probably do some call forwarding tricks, but that will require switching the number to a different carrier because a regular 1FR line won't do the necessary tricks.

    Oh, and some idiot on this forum is going to suggest doing some tricks with Asterisk - ignore them because it's 20 times more work than you need to do and in the end it's just going to confuse her.

    To really nab these guys, you're going to need to some how trace it back to the origin, and that's going to be damn hard. If you can't get a callback number to trace it with, then it would be nice if you could some how get ANI (automatic number identification) information. And that could be possible. Do it this way: find an agreeable caller who'll work to help nab this guy. Then get them to go to their telco and request their phone records get pulled and the ANI from the phone call retrieved. Then go to the telco's with that ANI and find out who owns it. Anyone can spoof caller ID, but it takes some real magic to spoof ANI. (Unfortunately some carriers toss away ANI records and translate caller ID to ANI, so be careful. It may take a few interations to get that info.)

    Now, that's still probably not going to work. I have no doubt these guys are offshore and using a VOIP box (probably Asterisk, lol). The VOIP calls terminate to a VOIP carrier in the US with an account that was set up under some fraudulent information. Then that VOIP carrier is peered with the real telco's via some regular old PRI's and that's the ANI information you'll get. However, I have no doubt that somewhere, some how a bill is generated and paid for, so if you can get to the VOIP carrier, you might be able to track this down.

    --
    ----- obSig
  88. Re: Don't sue, ask for sex. by rhesuspieces00 · · Score: 1

    what do you do when they say "Yes"?

  89. Change the number! by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

    "She's had the same number for over 50 years and doesn't want to change it."

    If the Feds can't or won't handle it, what's the best approach here?

    Change the number anyway! She doesn't want to change it, much like a lot of us who get joe-jobbed don't want to change our e-mail address, but there's no choice once your number / address / whatever has become tarnished. Some idiot is always going to have that number and be blaming it for their telemarketing woes.

  90. I could answer that... by Skippyboy · · Score: 1

    but I would have to KILL YOU!!!

    Maybe I will kill you anyway!!

    What state are you in?

  91. Your daughter come to my house and kick my dog! by Windows_NT · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I know how this old lady feels.
    It sucks to be violated by some punks that dont even know you.
    I had some people call about my student loan and said they had a federal rebate for me, all i had to do is give them a routing number to my bank account. and then they started trying to get me to say yes on a recorded call to saying they could take $400 dollars for a bunch of coupons .. i thought it might be a scam, but fell for giving my routing number, and said no to the coupons. they still trying to take my money, luckily i didnt have $400 in my account :)
    After me being a dumbass i called the State attorney General and they told me to call the FBI. The FBI said it happens all the time and there isnt anything they can do, cuz they cant find them.
    I think this is why its such a big problem, no one wants to handle it, the FBI just says, sorry no my problem, and the crooks prolly know this!

    --
    Go go Gadget Nailgun!
    1. Re:Your daughter come to my house and kick my dog! by gd2shoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Hello?"

      "You ^&*% fraudster! How dare you call me and #$%^@^$ demand my money!"

      "Call the FBI for me. Please."

      "What?"

      "No, I'm serious. The Boston FBI specifically. I'll give you the number if you want..."

      After you've woken them up with that shock, you can give your sob story. Might work. Might not. I think most of them will come to their senses. At least it will alleviate and redirect some of the anger of the callers. On the plus side, it might tick off the FBI, but they can't blame you for all the calls they'll be getting. (I know religion on Slashdot is taboo, but you might refer to the parable of the unjust judge: Luke 18:2-5) I would also recommend contacting a lawyer.

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    2. Re:Your daughter come to my house and kick my dog! by WNight · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, not religion, just believing in it. Big difference.

  92. Re: Don't sue, ask for sex. by kimvette · · Score: 3, Funny

    Then you mention something about fava beans.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  93. Re:Revenge I called the FBI and suggested that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My advice: If your world is on fire and you get involved with anybody who is going to get money from you, get their fingerprints off a restaurant glass, a writing pin from which you can lift the prints with cello tape, or something. Make him/her sign YOUR documents that their ass is voluntarily on a hook to YOU since their exploiting your pitiful situation. But, then if you're that smart, you might not be in my "hindsight is 20/20" situation.

    Or you could try not being a dumbass who gets ripped off by dime-store con-men.

  94. interesting ddos tactic by SpeedyG5 · · Score: 1

    This makes for an interesting ddos attack against a company's real phone number. Same thing as an spoofing the IP but instead you spoof there number, they get all the bad press and all the hate calls . They are so busy with those calls that the secretaries are missing the real calls or at least being ignorant to them as well.

  95. Handling Caller ID Spoofing? by Alizarin · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is a hardware product (google "Caller ID Manager") that costs about $100 which can enable white-list filtering on her phone. White list filtering means she enters a list of phone numbers she wants to ring through. Numbers not on her white list go either to voicemail or just get lost. This box wouldn't stop angry strangers from leaving a message, but it would stop them from ringing her phone.

    1. Re:Handling Caller ID Spoofing? by Milalwi · · Score: 1


      There is a hardware product (google "Caller ID Manager") that costs about $100 which can enable white-list filtering on her phone.

      Sadly, it appears to have been discontinued.

    2. Re:Handling Caller ID Spoofing? by ehintz · · Score: 1

      Asterisk/Trixbox do this quite nicely as well. I've had a US voip line ringing in New Zealand for 5 years now, and the last 3 or so I've used asterisk whitelisting to solve the problem of people ringing my SFBA number at 0800 PDT when it's 0300 NZST.

      As mentioned above, this solution would also provide the ability to make the OGM an IVR that allows legit callers to press a digit to get through (after explaining the whole scam thing via the OGM).

      --
      ehintz
  96. Re:Revenge I called the FBI and suggested that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See the movie "The Star Chamber" for a good reason why it is illegal.

    Because Hollywood movies are such a trustworthy reference and example base for making such decisions.

  97. Teenage Mutant Ninja Lawyers by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    Look, lady, call a fucking lawyer. You should be able to sue for fraud, slander, and God knows what else.

    When your appendix bursts do you ask slashdot what to do, or do you see a doctor? CALL A LAWYER!!!!

    1. Re:Teenage Mutant Ninja Lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when my appendix bursts, I shouldn't see a doctor; I should call a lawyer? Boy did I have that one backwards. Thanks!

  98. Re:Revenge I called the FBI and suggested that by nizo · · Score: 1

    I thought everyone got all their medical and law advice from Hollywood movies?

  99. FCC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try contacting the FCC.

  100. i believe by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    the sword is mightier than the pen

    that was a lame joke, but in actuality, my brother in law sells swords on the internet, heh

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  101. Try the Attorney General's office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In MA, I would suggest contacting the Attorney General. Luckily, MA is more protective of individuals than most states in matters like this.

  102. DDOS? by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

    "She's had the same number for over 50 years and doesn't want to change it."

    I had the same problem sort of. My cell phone number it turns out was the same number as the 800 number for a produce company. I live in the 805 area code and people see the 8 in the area code and stop reading. So at 4 in the morning on most 1st and 15ths of the month I get about a dozen calls from clueless restaurants wanting to order produce for the next 2 weeks. I don't speak Spanish very well and Chinese even less.

    So sometimes I just took their orders and blew them off. Other times I took their orders and told them there was an $800 delivery fee. Well I told them, I have to find a produce company, get a truck, call in sick to work, and then figure out how I could drive 150 miles (usually the average distance to where the restaurant was from me) to deliver their produce by the hour they wanted it delivered. I told them it would probably be cheaper to call a produce company. The only reason I didn't change my phone number was the hassle of telling all your friends and all the people who have your number of the new number and you always miss a couple of those and then it was on my resume in about a dozen different places on various accounts and all my web addresses etc. and I only had it for 3 years, she's had it for 50 years.

    Frankly I think we can find the company/companies that is/are trying to sell stuff using her number and cost them a WHOLE lot of money by just everybody and his brother filing suit against them for whatever strikes our fancy. sort of a denial of time to think attack. Oh and all of Slashdot can file BBB complaints every time they change their company name. Hey we have a lot of resources here and I'm sure there are many perfectly legal ways to harass these guys half to death. Let's put hour heads together and ...

    Oh, yeah this is Slashdot, anything that requires any action is well you know...

    never mind

    1. Re:DDOS? by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Some funny things can happen with phone numbers.

      I was a fax tech many years ago. One day at a customers premises, I dialed the Telco fax back test service. To my surprise I heard a very irate voice yelling this is not a fax machine, please do not call this number again I picked up the handset and spoke with the poor guy.

      The faxback number was 036400999

      This poor guy was 3640099.

      When a fax tech was at a business with a PABX, which needed a 0 for an outside line, and didnt realise, this poor bloke got the call every time! He was just a bit pissed off!

      I wondered how many times I had rung the poor bloke, as the speaker was not on in the bulk of machines at the time!

      Not long after the FAX test number was changed

  103. Representatives and FCC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She should then contact her Senate and House representatives. They really fall all over themselves, especially in an election cycle, helping people who may then vote for them.

    She should also contact the FCC and the FTC.

  104. EXPOSE AND EXTERMINATE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't we find out who they are and expose and campaign against them on the internet?

  105. Irony by DrData99 · · Score: 2, Funny

    So am I the only one that sees the irony in having a banner ad for a product that lets you "FAKE your Caller ID" on a discussion about how bad that is and how to stop it?

  106. Contact State AG by glittermage · · Score: 2, Informative

    I would contact your State Attorney General's office. The terminating and transit carriers rely on originating carrier to pass the originating number. The terminating and transit carriers may have event records which provides a trunk ID which may indicate what network passed the call to the terminating carrier. If each transit carrier has the same type of record you may eventually identify the originating carrier. Then the originating carrier can search their records for the terminating number and that may identify the source. This assumes you can convince each carrier in the link to provide records (which may not exist) and may get lucky and identify the source. This works whether VoIP or circuits are used if the carriers keep records. After all that you may find the source to be worthless (prepaid phone or international location for example). Since the source is telemarketing calls I suspect they have a brick and mortar building somewhere.

  107. Consumer protection division, State AG's Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is easily identity theft
    http://www.mass.gov/?pageID=cagotopic&L=2&L0=Home&L1=Consumer+Protection&sid=Cago

    The AG is an elected official, and they care about what voters think. Ask your relative to file a detailed report, then go to her state rep and ask him/her to follow up with the AG.

    The mechanics of finding the perp is not that difficult, unless the calls are coming from overseas. You just need to motivate the officials a bit to act.

  108. Re: Don't sue, ask for sex. by vvaduva · · Score: 1

    Signup for Google's Grand Central service. It works fine for me...you can mark "spammers" and block them permanently from calling you. Easy and no headaches.

  109. Honestly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I understand she doesn't want to change her phone #, but times change and to deal with right now thats the best course of action to have them stop calling immediately.

    On the other hand, she could continue to contact the FBI and her phone service, or hire a laywer maybe? and fight this to bring the issue into the light and have something done about it.

  110. Re:Revenge I called the FBI and suggested that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My advice: If your world is on fire and you get involved with anybody who is going to get money from you, get their fingerprints off a restaurant glass, a writing pin from which you can lift the prints with cello tape, or something. Make him/her sign YOUR documents that their ass is voluntarily on a hook to YOU since their exploiting your pitiful situation. But, then if you're that smart, you might not be in my "hindsight is 20/20" situation.

    Or you could try not being a dumbass who gets ripped off by dime-store con-men.

    Give him a break. He's probably just frustrated from struggling to sign his name with a thumbtack.

  111. Path of least resistance by SilverJets · · Score: 1

    Change her phone number. Big deal, she's had it for 50 years. What is she worried that someone she lost touch with 40 years ago won't be able to find her?

  112. Technological solutions by Ichijo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Phone companies should read the caller ID information from outbound calls from their customers and block the call if the caller ID doesn't match.

    The lady could setup a voice menu explaining that she isn't responsible for those calls, and press 1 if they want to ring through. That should eliminate some of the calls.

    --
    Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    1. Re:Technological solutions by quetwo · · Score: 1

      The problem with this solution is large, legitimate call centers. Google, for example, has call centers in 10 states. They want all their customers to call a single phone number (in Mountain View), and have their pbx transfer the call to the location that is open, and has the shortest queue. This problem is exacerbated by the use of toll-free numbers (1-800 numbers), where the phone number is owned by a 3rd party and forwarded to a local number. In that case, the company doesn't own the 800 number, nor is it in their blocks of numbers -- yet they probably want to use that number for outgoing calls for both privacy of call center agents, and to properly use their ACD.

  113. Local police by TheMCP · · Score: 1

    She can call her local police of herself or the area of where any threatening or harassing calls to her came from. THEY can get the call data from the phone companies and prosecute. (If her phone company isn't Ma Bell, she'll probably be asked to call them to get the phone number the cops are supposed to call. It's not difficult. They'll tell her what to ask for.)

    It doesn't much matter if the FBI isn't interested, if she hasn't even tried her local cops yet.

  114. Ask for help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask the ones who call back for death threats for info on the offending company.

    Explain the situation and tell them you want to nail the bastards, and ask for their help.

  115. Re: Don't sue, ask for sex. by TheSeventh · · Score: 1

    what do you do when they say "Yes"?

    Hmm, they say "yes". What could then happen? Oh, I know, get more information about them so you could "meet" them somewhere . . .

    --
    Just because you're paranoid, it doesn't mean that they're not out to get you.
  116. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not put in a PUC Complaint (Public Utility Commission)? I believe once you have an active complaint/ticket with your local exchange carrier you can then proceed with contacting the PUC and they can take it from there. Most telephone companies panic when they hear "PUC Complaint" so the fact that the local carrier in this matter is not doing anything, opening a PUC complaint may change that very quickly.

    -Anonymous

  117. This might not be spoofing... by Benfea · · Score: 1
    ...at least not on purpose.

    It seems that someone occasionally makes a mistake that results in incorrect caller ID. For years, someone's business phone (or cell phone used for business) incorrectly reported my parents' home number. The result was that they got a ton of calls every week from business people from another state who would call up and ask "Why did you call me?"

    The phone company was absolutely no help at all, and this went on for years. Eventually the fellow whose phone was incorrectly identifying itself figured out the problem and had it corrected, because the phone calls stopped.

    While it's certainly possible that some telemarketing company is deliberately spoofing someone else's caller ID, it is also possible that this is a legitimate mistake somewhere by someone. Hanlon's Razor says not to assume malice when incompetence or stupidity are sufficient to explain things.

  118. wozniak by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    of apple fame, got a vanity number once consisting of nothing but 8s. 888-8888

    and he got a lot of calls from toddlers

    apparently, when you are two feet tall, and reach up to press buttons on the telephone, 8 is what your fingers naturally gravitate too

    and that's 100% true. i think the source was wired magazine from the late 90s. wozniak was on the front cover i think

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  119. One thing that works... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This happened to me for a while, until I kept them on the line long enough that I could start asking questions. The last time they called, I asked "Where are you located?", "How did you get my phone number?", and "Do you realize that by continuing to call me you're breaking the law?". While they never gave a straight answer, they hung up on me (after the breaking-the-law question) and stopped calling.

    Granted this does nothing to punish someone who should be punished, but it did stop the calls.

  120. a little off topic but stay with me by bi_boy · · Score: 1

    Not to be OT but I really hope we hear an update regarding this, assuming something happens. And not just this story, but others, they appear and pique my interest then bam! Nary to hear back from them again.

    It makes me sad cos I hope granny comes out of it ok and with her 50 year old phone number.

    --
    Chicken fried butter sticks? Do ... do you use a fork? - Black Mage, 8-Bit Theater
  121. Extended Car Warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is an extended car warranty a scam? I bought one from the dealer.

    1. Re:Extended Car Warranty by tekiegreg · · Score: 1

      Well there's 2 things going on here. The ones from the dealer are generally not a scam per se. Typically not recommended that you buy an extended warranty, but if you buy a warranty from the dealer then have a claim, you're likely to get paid on your claim (or at the least have a return address to pursue further action with).

      Now when you buy an extended warranty outside of the dealer, you enter a shady place. Oftentime these extended warranty dealers are little more than crooks who look for every reason to not pay a claim, and duck every attempt to file a claim (giving invalid addresses, phone numbers, etc.). Basically just outright scams...

      --
      ...in bed
  122. A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Let's spend the money collected through taxes wisely (education and infrastructure), instead of stupidly (wars and bank bailouts) and see if that fixes things.

    1. Re:A better idea by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Too late.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
  123. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  124. You're being sarcastic, but you are still correct by Weaselmancer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah, that's the worst problem we face in America today.

    It is. Not bogus phone calls, mind you. But governmental apathy. The system doesn't care about the so called "little people" anymore.

    If it was the mayor of a big town, or a chief of police, or a congressman that was being harassed in this way the FBI would be all over it - and you know it.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  125. Try reporting the death threats. by JerryLove · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That might get the FBI's attention, but try the locals first.

    And the locals are the starting point for this problem too. If the scammers are next door, then there's no jurisdiction for the FBI.

  126. Spoof caller ID right here by PadRacerExtreme · · Score: 1

    From an article in PC world I recently read. it is the last 'trick' on the first page.

    SpoofCard

    How illegal can it be?

    --
    Just remember - if the world didn't suck, we would all fall off.
  127. Help me Hank! by AgentPhunk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You mentioned you're in the Boston area. Why not try "Help me Hank" - Channel 7's investigative reporter.

  128. go to the press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best way is to announce the most publicaly way possible how Federal authorities are incompetent, I bet they will do something about it after.

    Thats the way to go now to solve things. Go to the press, make it very public.

  129. Beware the salesperson who asks for money upfront by lordofthechia · · Score: 1

    Man sorry you had to go through that. I wanted to chime in and say that my GF had a similar experience (with the $700 headhunter). She did wait to talk to me before agreeing to anything though.

    Simple truth is a headhunter makes that or more a month on an skilled employee they can supply for an employer. So I simply explained to her, that if you're a "people" salesperson, and you make lots off of each person, would you want to willfully diminish your inventory by a stupid fee like that?

    Further we did the math and figured out that on her last contract (which paid her *incredibly* well) the employment agency was pulling in $1500 to $2000 a month. We were able to figure this out since her last boss accidentally let her know how much the employment agency was getting paid (and they in turn paid my GF).

    Again, not insulting you Davidseyes. If I were in your position I too would be looking at any opportunity for work. But people like that "Headhunter", that prey on the desperate are the lowest kind of low (in my opinion, up there with Rent to Own places and Mortgage Brokers that tack huge fees on people's mortgages on top of the commission they get from the bank).

    That said, maybe it would be a good idea to talk to legitimate employment agencies and ask them how to deal with scammers like that.

    --
    Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
  130. Business Line was Spoofed by beerdini · · Score: 1

    We were having one of our incoming trunk phone lines spoofed on and off through the year. The number was one of 4 lines for incoming calls only and the spoofers were calling 911. We had a full top to bottom analysis of our phone system and security system to make sure that it wasn't us, and when I was talking to the security system guy he said that another local abandoned building had the same thing going on, which is when I realized it was spoofing. Nothing like being met with the police first thing in the morning about numerous hangup 911 calls from your location to make you get to the bottom of the situation. Hasn't come back in a number of months.

    I'd say if the lady is worried and doesn't want to change the number, get caller ID and turn off the answering machine when it is a number that she doesn't recognize.

  131. FTC wont help either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been reporting these folks (the spammers, not someone for ringing me to complain that I'm a spammer like your LOL) to the FTC constantly; after a dozen or so reports they finally sent me a letter saying they couldn't help becuase there was no evidence of a crime. As this was obviously wrong (cold-calling people with an recorded message is illegal; not listing your company name and a number they can be reached on in the initial message is illegal; etc. etc.) I rang the FTC and was told that the actual problem was that there wasn't enough information to track this down to the perpetrator. Which is also fairly obviously wrong, as they could chase it through my phone company to the operator being used. But if the operator in question is overseas, then good luck getting them to stop.

    1. Re:FTC wont help either by Skapare · · Score: 1

      A lot of these calls actually do come from overseas, usually the Caribbean or Africa. Some have been tracked to Pakistan, too. The phone companies need to block calls from overseas circuits with a domestic caller ID info attached.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  132. ID Spoofing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is caller ID spoofing illegal? My brother's wife often gets calls from marketing agencies or a credit collector spoofing their ID. In one instance, get this, they spoofed their ID as her kid's pediatric hospital. Nothing terrifies a mother more than getting an unexpected call from a pediatric hospital during the middle of a school day. She went off the handle on them, which of course they claim they're not using this practice and then hang up... only to call again a few days later, spoofing themselves as some other number.

    Her number is also on the do-not-call-list, which hasn't been helping at all.

  133. Holy segue batman! by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Could you even try to go further from the topic?

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Holy segue batman! by Lije+Baley · · Score: 1

      Why yes, yes I could!

      Darn, I had a helluva time deciding whether to give you this awesome reply or mod you up, but either way, YOU WIN!

      --
      Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
    2. Re:Holy segue batman! by Lije+Baley · · Score: 1

      ps
      If you're looking for that Batman guy, he is a frequent poster. You'll find him in the pedantic doucheba-, er, Doc Ruby section of the comments.

      Oh and I commend you for your spelling. Damn, I should have modded you up after all!

      --
      Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
  134. DramaTel by Xanlexian · · Score: 1

    I thought this was a joke when I first saw it on television. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZD64vy-205Q/ -- "This ain't T-Money!" -- HAH!

    --
    "Congratulations, Boots. Your robot has become self-aware. You're a daddy now." -- Dr. Rho Bowman
    1. Re:DramaTel by Xanlexian · · Score: 1

      That link didn't seem to work -- Just search "dramatel" on youtube and the first one. One of the funniest damn commercials I've seen in a while.

      --
      "Congratulations, Boots. Your robot has become self-aware. You're a daddy now." -- Dr. Rho Bowman
  135. Getting Help. by kingjoebob · · Score: 1

    There are a couple things I've learned in my short time on earth about getting help when those who should help don't/won't.
    1) Call the media. The power of some investigative journalist shoving a microphone in the face of the big guys at the phone company will do wonders.
    2) Call your Congressman and find out why the Authorities will not do their job. Congressmen have lackeys who do nothing but call people and exert pressure on those who need to be pressured.
    3) If all else fails, Go in person and raise all holy hell. I will guarantee if you sit outside of the phone company headquarters throwing a shit fit, that will get someone's attention in upper management.
    I have personally done 2 and 3 and They worked rather well, my situations were resolved in less than a day.
    --kjb

  136. Not bogus at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    That is not a solution. You can only find out who calls you. The source is the spammer who uses your phone number as caller ID when he calls other people (the people who then call you to complain, shout expletives, etc.)

    Perhaps you're more familiar with email. There's an analogous problem with email spam: When a spammer uses your email address in the "from:" header, then you will find your inbox flooded with "no such user" errors, "we have received your message and will get back to you shortly" promises, out-of-office notices and various other automated replies, in addition to the occasional "fuck you, spammer, I've looked up your hoster and will get you disconnected" threats from clueless anger management candidates.

    If you're lucky, then some of those messages will cite the spam back to you. If you're extra lucky, some of those will include complete headers. Most however will not give any indication who the person is who sent the message with your email address in the "from:" header. This is the norm with telephone communications, as there are no easily available "headers" which a spam target could relay to you.

    You can try to have the phone company track down all irate callers (who see themselves as the victim) one by one, but what good is that going to do? You can just as well tell them when they call that someone else uses a fake caller ID with your number. You really want to get the spammer who causes all these people to get mad at you. That is not something that your phone company can help you with.

  137. Re: Don't sue, ask for sex. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Asking to be removed doesn't work.

    Citing the do not call list doesn't work. They laugh.

    Telling the male calling, in my deepest voice, that he sounds cute and I want his home number, THAT seems to work. Especially on the ones with southern accents.

    I wonder what would happen if everyone started propositioning these callers for 'favors'.

    Or say, "Hold on one sec," and then call real loudly in the background, "Tommy! It ain't gonna' fit in the da' trunk like dat! You gotta' put da' plastic down 'n den cut it up foist!"

    *pause*

    "TOMMY! PUT THE DAMN GUN DOWN AND LISTEN TA' ME WHEN I'M TALKIN' AT CHOO!"

    If they're still on the line after that, you may need to play a chain-saw recording real loudly to help emphasize your roleplay.

  138. Get put ON list, not removed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell the callers to put you on their DO NOT CALL list. Otherwise, they might remove you from the list they're using, but when they get a new list from a client you might be on that new list (and on the list which the client purchased). Having you on the calling service's block list should stop calls from that one service, at least.

  139. Here's now I decided to deal with it.... by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

    Whenever I get a warranty phone call, credit repair phone call, etc... I harrass the shit out of them. I call them fags. I tell them that I fucked their mothers, and that she was ok for being a five dollar whore. I tell them that I'll hunt them down, fuck em in the ass, cut off their heads, and feed their bodies to rats. I threaten to rape their sisters, wives, children, dogs, cats, etc... I threaten to bomb their offices. I am as abrasive, and threatening as I can get. Why?

    Because the fuckers never identify their company, or who they are. They give no information at all. So, I'm trolling for charges, any charges, against me. When they finally do contact law enforcement and file charges, I'll be able to pull the complaint, and then I'll know who those motherfuckers are. Then I'll know exactly who to send a lawyer after.

  140. Only Solution: Change Phone Numbers by Alereon · · Score: 1

    There is no technical way to prevent Caller ID Spoofing, your phone company has no way to stop this except changing your phone number so it is no longer your number being spoofed (they can also change the name on the spoofed number after it is no longer assigned to you). The caller can send any Caller ID number they want, and the terminating carrier will do a caller name lookup on this number. The FCC is the correct agency to contact to report this, my understanding is that Caller ID spoofing in and of itself is not a crime, but it is possible for the action to be covered under fraud or other laws depending on the specifics.

    1. Re:Only Solution: Change Phone Numbers by Skapare · · Score: 1

      You are referring to the victim's phone company. Sure, they are (probably) not involved in the spoofed phone calls in the first place. But the phone company providing services to the scammer is. That other phone company can stop the spoofing. But it costs some money to do so because it requires some added software on each phone switch to check the caller ID info to see that it matches the phone numbers on the customer's trunk circuit. Since that other phone company and the scammer are not in a business relationship with the victim, it would take passing a law to force this to happen. They should be required to have these checks in place along with both civil and criminal penalties for failure to do so.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:Only Solution: Change Phone Numbers by Alereon · · Score: 1

      You are referring to the victim's phone company. Sure, they are (probably) not involved in the spoofed phone calls in the first place. But the phone company providing services to the scammer is. That other phone company can stop the spoofing. But it costs some money to do so because it requires some added software on each phone switch to check the caller ID info to see that it matches the phone numbers on the customer's trunk circuit. Since that other phone company and the scammer are not in a business relationship with the victim, it would take passing a law to force this to happen. They should be required to have these checks in place along with both civil and criminal penalties for failure to do so.

      Unfortunately, we don't get to just make up rules about how the phone system should work. The reality is that a company with a PRI gets to send whatever Caller ID number they want, and there are perfectly valid reasons for wanting to send a number that isn't active on that trunk (such as sending a toll free number or a call-back number for an inbound call center). The solution is for the FCC to make it a crime to spoof Caller ID in order to commit a crime, but I suspect that this is already illegal.

    3. Re:Only Solution: Change Phone Numbers by Skapare · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, we don't get to just make up rules about how the phone system should work. The reality is that a company with a PRI gets to send whatever Caller ID number they want, and there are perfectly valid reasons for wanting to send a number that isn't active on that trunk (such as sending a toll free number or a call-back number for an inbound call center). The solution is for the FCC to make it a crime to spoof Caller ID in order to commit a crime, but I suspect that this is already illegal.

      We do get to make rules and laws regarding commerce and fraud. We do get to choose how to make those rules and laws work. And merely making it a crime to spoof Caller ID won't stop those people who are already committing a crime (the scam they are doing in the calls). What we need is a Caller ID that can be trusted.

      So be a little more creative. The law that requires validation of transmitted numbers can include a clause that allows a phone customer to submit additional phone numbers, which must be researched to verify that they really are owned by the phone customer (even if that number is obtained through a different phone company). If valid, the number can be added to the account.

      The point is, we need to be sure the numbers are valid. Arguably, spoofing caller ID is already fraud. But the crimes will just continue to happen. Callers can continue to just not send caller ID if other laws allow them to do that. This just makes sure a caller ID number is valid. There is no value to legitimate phone users to have invalid caller ID info. And I don't want to go so far as to require phone companies to record the track of every phone call ever made just to track down scammers (although certain government entities appear to be doing just that, already).

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  141. Re:You're being sarcastic, but you are still corre by Pollardito · · Score: 3, Insightful

    you mean if, for example, you were running for VP and your email account was broken into?

  142. That law has a big loophole by Skapare · · Score: 2, Informative

    The telco can transmit the caller ID info anyway, because they have no "intent to defraud, cause harm, or wrongfully obtain anything of value". Instead, this qualification should be removed so that the telco itself is disallowed to transmit a caller ID that is wrong. They have the means to determine if it is wrong (at least the first telco the caller is serviced by).

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  143. DHS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My recomendation:

    Call Dept Homeland Security. Tell them because of the threatening nature of the return calls that you suspect that this is related to terrorist activity.

  144. FBI? Not actually. The FTC does this. by Criceratops · · Score: 1

    Seriously, when I have had troubles with annoying spoofed-caller-ID telemarketers, I call the FTC (Federal Trade Commission) and file a formal complaint. This has actually led to these people being BUSTED. Which delights me to no end. They have an 800 number and are very polite. The more people who report this, the more chance that they will investigate and bust the offenders.

    --
    crappy triceratops
  145. Re:FBI? Not actually. The FTC does this. by Criceratops · · Score: 1

    Oddly enough, when I finished posting this, the top banner ad was for something called "SpoofCard" that enables you to use fake Caller ID stuff. Irony, being served at high-speed via targeted ads.

    --
    crappy triceratops
  146. Get the FTC involved? by efalk · · Score: 1

    I get one of those calls every day, like clockwork, on my cell phone. I've pressed the "press 2 to be removed from our list" button with no effect (big surprise).

    It's illegal to make sales calls to cellphones. Is there any chance of the FTC actually doing anything about these people?

  147. Same thing happened to me by flipper9 · · Score: 1

    I had the same thing happen when I signed up for a VOIP call-in number. Immediately, I started getting constant phone calls, every minute or two, nonstop, from very angry folks who were getting phone calls from telemarketers that were faking my number! I tried contacting the VOIP service, but they said there was nothing they could do about it until next week, or I could just eat the charge of setting up another line.

    After a day of the phone constantly ringing off the hook, and my voicemail quickly filling up...I was angry, so I rerouted my phone number to their technical support telephone. The problem was resolved that night! I was given a new phone number and life was good again.

  148. So terrified... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe a little off here but some one is there life terrified because they dont want to change there phone number? I think the real the question isnt how to stop the callerID spoofing its like asking how will we stop hackers/crackers/phreaking etc.. It comes down to living terrified vs Phone Number. Change your phone number to unlisted number. just m2c

  149. Re: PBX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is it that in *this* community, no one has mentioned some TrixBox based solution?

    I think we should:
    Build a BlackList (think DNS BL's for spam blocking)
    Include support for BlackList in Asterisk
    Market this as an embedded appliance for the home ("answering machine with toys")

    let users record custom messages *for* the telemarketers (and of course they don't get a *beep*)

    Let the geeky solution win!

  150. Change her number by lordsid · · Score: 1

    3 options
    1) Follow your plan and waste a ton of time trying to track down people you won't be able to
    2) Change the phone number
    3) Deal with it.

    Tell the old bat to change her number. If she doesn't like that answer tell her tough shit.

    This is the exactly what I would tell my grandmother if she came to me with the same problem.

    Treat unreasonable people unreasonably.

    --
    IMAGE VERIFICATION IS EVIL!
  151. No reason to change email by CustomDesigned · · Score: 1

    Unless your email is one of those "free" accounts, you should publish authentication for it (you do run your own email server, don't you?). SPF and maybe DKIM. Anything that sends out "you have a virus" responses (when any virus email is obviously forged) is a spammer. They get automatically blacklisted on my system. Check the authentication on your incoming mail also. Track reputation by authentication status.

    You are limited in what you can do about phone numbers, but email has lots of tools available.

  152. Well-intending? by crossmr · · Score: 1

    Given the context in which her address was posted online I don't think there could be any misconception about why it was posted online. It was done only to encourage mob justice, this is hardly well-intentioned.

  153. Better yet... by aardwolf64 · · Score: 1

    Just have her say someone was making threats against Obama B(iden)...

  154. The way things work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know from personal experience tracking down harassing phone callers that the ONLY WAY a phone company will help a non-government agency is if you come to their door with a sheriff equipped with a court order.

    Similarly the FBI will only act if you can prove $50,000+ in damages.

    RSD

  155. Just for the hell of it... by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    You might want to check out the site Who Called Us. It's an attempt to construct a database of such calls and could be useful for coordinated efforts with other victims coming forward.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
  156. It's an election year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Send a substantial bri..., er, contribution to the incumbent seeking reelection, and let him/her know about this poor woman's problem with the bureaucracy. Taking on barbarians who prey on defenseless little old ladies and lazy public servants who don't help her, what a great opportunity for free last-minute publicity! Act fast: the election is just two weeks away; as of Nov. 5 they'll quit listening to the not-so-special interests until the primary elections in 2010!

  157. I got their info and am about to file suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TO EVERYONE WHO'S GOTTEN THESE CALLS:

    The company behind it (i.e. actually selling the warranties - the telemarketers are all different!) is:
    SafeData Management Services, Inc C2330112
    James C. "Jim" Sletner (info@safedatainc.com)
    530 722 9099 (work)
    P.O. Box 992050 (WHOIS address)
    Redding, CA 96099
    2664 HARTNELL AVE (google)
    REDDING, CA 96002
    9434 DESCHUTES RD #204 (Secretary of State)
    PALO CEDRO, CA 96073
    530 243 4958 (home)
    15676 OLD STAGE COACH RD
    REDDING, CA 96001

    Jim's lawyer: Jennifer Shaw, legal representative of Jim Sletner & his many front companies
    legalcompliance@cdwsnow.com / 800 209 3755 x197

    They also have a Nevada front:
    Consumer Direct Warranty Services aka AA Auto Warranty Services
    P.O. Box 60357 (http://www.aaautowarranty.com/contracts/DirectChoice.pdf)
    Las Vegas, NV 89160-0357
    4425 East Sahara Avenue (google)
    Las Vegas, nv 89104-6356
    (702) 207-1001
    P.O. Box 993520 (http://www.aaautowarranty.com/DirectChoiceContract.asp)
    Redding, CA 96099-3520
    800 209 3755
    aka Manufacturer's Direct Warranty Services C3060709
    aka Warranty Administration Services, Inc. C306269
    PO BOX 992050
    REDDING, CA 96099-2050
    TAMARA BERBENA
    6973 YVONNE CT
    REDDING, CA 9600

    In MY CASE (which may not be yours), the telemarketers were:
    National Dealers Warranty Service
    BBB member, "D" rating (http://www.labbb.org/BBBWeb/Forms/Business/CompanyReportPage_Expository.aspx?CompanyID=100068709)
    (888) 539-8555
    (949) 533-9484 - voicemail: Charles Butler
    (949) 309-3798 fax
    Orange County fictious business name reg. # 20086155068
    Jason Garcia, Owner
    Charles Butler - MySpace Warranty2008
    Kamisha Daniel - Global Service Partners, LLC 200818010160 / OCFBN 20086161409
    Martinee aka Lashunn Jackson (same address as Kamisha Daniels: 117 Waverly Dr., Alhambra CA)
    Mario Moreno
    25910 Acero
    Suite 200
    Mission Viejo, CA 92691

    PLEASE NOTE: The caller ID that you are getting is FAKE. They spoof it. Whoever's it is in actuality, it's just some poor bastard who happened to have that number - don't bother the person. Go after the real ones.

    What you can do:
    1. Lie to them. Pretend like you're interested. Get three critical pieces of info: the COMPANY NAME, a DIRECT phone number (they first give you an 800 number, ask if you can have a direct line), and a MAILING ADDRESS where you can send a check. Remember, pretend you have an actual car that you want to warranty, and you're just really mistrustful of this whole newfangled interweb thing, so you'd rather send a check in by mail.

    2. Call your phone service provider and demand the ANI and PBX records about the calls, saying that they spoofed Caller ID and violated the TCPA. (Look those all up on Wikipedia.) You may need to make your demand in the form of a subpoena.

    3. Using that info (most importantly, you need their actual business name and address), go sue them in your local small claims court for $2500-$7500.

    If you really want, you can sue them in superior civil court for all that plus injunctions, damages, lawyer fees, etc etc etc - but it's more of a pain. Small claims court is pretty easy, at least in CA. Just look up your county court's website for info.

    See more info on these scum, legal summary, & outcome of my suit against them @ my blog: http://saizai.livejournal.com/896354.html

  158. I got these, got the info, and am suing :) by saizai · · Score: 1

    See more info on these scum & outcome of my suit against them @ my blog: http://saizai.livejournal.com/896354.html

    (This includes full addresses, phone #s, a rundown of the relevant laws they're breaking [TCPA, TSR, CA CLRA], etc.)


    Key info:
    James C. "Jim" Sletner (info@safedatainc.com)
    SafeData Management Services, Inc C2330112 (CA)
    530 722 9099 (work)

    Jim's lawyer: Jennifer Shaw
    legalcompliance@cdwsnow.com / 800 209 3755 x197

    They also have a Nevada front:
    Consumer Direct Warranty Services aka AA Auto Warranty Services aka Manufacturer's Direct Warranty Services aka Warranty Administration Services, Inc. C306269
    (702) 207-1001


    In MY CASE (which may not be yours), the telemarketers were:
    National Dealers Warranty Service
    *** DIRECT LINE 949 309 3750 x0 ***

    They also have 3751,3752, etc. I haven't mapped out the full set, but feel free to do so and email me if you do. I'll add the info to my post above.

    If you call the direct line above, they will react EXACTLY as if their autodialer called you, because they can't tell the difference! Again, if you do this, email me your recordings. :-) (Hint: Skype + Audio Hijack Pro)


    PLEASE NOTE: The caller ID that you are getting is FAKE. They spoof it. Whoever's it is in actuality, it's just some poor bastard who happened to have that number - don't bother the person. Go after the real ones.

    What you can do:
    1. Lie to them. Pretend like you're interested. Get three critical pieces of info: the COMPANY NAME, a DIRECT phone number (they first give you an 800 number, ask if you can have a direct line), and a MAILING ADDRESS where you can send a check. Remember, pretend you have an actual car that you want to warranty, and you're just really mistrustful of this whole newfangled interweb thing, so you'd rather send a check in by mail. (Worked for me!)

    2. Call your phone service provider and demand the ANI and PBX records about the calls, saying that they spoofed Caller ID and violated the TCPA. (Look those all up on Wikipedia.) Your demand will probably have to come in the form of a subpoena, alas. (I'm sending one to AT&T as part of my suit.)

    3. Using that info (most importantly, you need their actual business name and address), go sue them in your local small claims court for $2500-$7500.


    If you really want, you can sue them in superior civil court for all that plus injunctions, damages, lawyer fees, etc etc etc - but it's more of a pain. Small claims court is pretty easy, at least in CA. Just look up your county court's website for info.

    Have fun with them. :-)

    --
    http://s.ai - http://s.ai/foia - http://s.ai/tsa/legal - https://patreon.com/saizai
  159. "Have a brigade of nobles kill them" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    isn't an option here. Nor is "get a large quantity of peasants" (except in New Jersey, which inexplicably has brought back peasantry).

  160. Re:You're being sarcastic, but you are still corre by Weaselmancer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A perfect example. Hacking a Yahoo account is fairly trivial. It was some 20 year old kid that just did some simple password guessing.

    And of course, the FBI came down on him like a ton of bricks.

    I wonder if someone illegally gained access to my email account if they would even notice. I'm guessing not.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  161. The FCC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The FCC is the agency responsible for handling telecommunications matters and their regulations govern telemarketers, etc. A complaint should be filed with them with regards to the matter you describe.

    Also, there is you state attorney general or equivalent. They will often investigate such matters.

    In addition, if she is receiving threatening phone calls, contact your local law enforcement to report them right when they occur. The people who made them will certainly get in trouble, but it will prompt action.

  162. imho by Bored+MPA · · Score: 1

    Someone will address it if it gets in the media; you don't need to attach some poor schmuck's name unless it's already been escalated and the escalation has proven ineffective.

    Anyone halfway competent with more than a year of actual management exposure in gov't will work to address the issue before it gets to the media. Despite the bureaucracy and politics they have to deal with, you can be certain they don't want to be on or contribute to the "zomg gov't is incompetent" news feed if given a clear option.

    At least for some agencies, for those that deal day-to-day with judging/ranking/prioritizing people and services, they probably won't bat an eye to brush you off because they know the press ignores equity/effectiveness issues every day when it comes to certain programs. But I believe the FCC is surprised when people submit complaints to them at all, so the might actually be responsive if a little disorganized.

    this is just armchair quarterbacking; i dont work for the feds.

    1. Re:imho by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Someone will address it if it gets in the media; you don't need to attach some poor schmuck's name unless it's already been escalated and the escalation has proven ineffective.

      We are addressing a case where the poster has already been given the runaround. If I were in that position, I would not be content to wait while some pointy-haired bureaucrat purportedly "escalates" the issue while varnishing her fingernails.. I've had a lot of that with one of the telcos I have endured, but that's a rant for another time.

      No, the point is to get results, and if someone has to jump to keep his ass away from the flames, then so be it. That's the whole point.

  163. just like spam mail... by Cybertoy · · Score: 1

    you're screwed. Face it. This is like a spammer using your e-mail address as sender. Only with spam people know that it's a false sender. It will be a matter of time until called people recognize the fact that you can't trust caller-id unless the FCC would do something against this. Then again if the FCC does something against it you can probably spoof caller-ID from other countries.

  164. Linda never said that... by SillySlashdotName · · Score: 1

    I just watched that whole film again, and no where in it does Linda Lovelace use the words "follow the money".

    I will have to watch it again a few times to make sure, though...

    And now I can claim it is 'research"!

    THANKS!!

    --
    Acts of massive stupidity are almost never covered by warranty. --me.
    1. Re:Linda never said that... by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Linda's work is a classic, but I am referring to the FBI Deputy Director, the one that caused "Tricky Dick", a.k.a. President Nixon to resign. After more research on Linda, try "All The Presidents Men". It's good also.

    2. Re:Linda never said that... by SillySlashdotName · · Score: 1

      I looked it up, and there is not enough nudity in "All The Presidents Men". I will be restricting my research to Linda, et al.

      By the way, I recognized the advice to Woodward and Bernstein by their anonymous informant, which I would think everyone would recognize as well, but chose to use an alternate interpretation to go for the unexpected - resulting in humor.

      --
      Acts of massive stupidity are almost never covered by warranty. --me.
  165. The fix is simple, and the same as IP... by NateTech · · Score: 1

    Carriers started filtering IP spoofing years ago.

    Carriers also need to filter out ANI that is not for numbers on their networks at the inbound edge.

    Having worked with carriers for over 15 years, ANI is known to be generally worthless for accuracy. If you get a valid ANI from the network, great. If it's mangled, wrong, or otherwise stupid... it happens.

    The only way to clean it up is that all good (large) carriers must agree to dump any incoming ANI information that's not a number on their network.

    --
    +++OK ATH
  166. If you have a problem by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

    If no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire the A-TEAM.

    --
    mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.