Slashdot Mirror


Battlestar Galactica Comes To an End

On Friday evening, Battlestar Galactica ended its four-season run as one of the most popular science fiction shows in recent history. 2.4 million people tuned in for the finale, and reactions to the ending — positive, negative, and often a mix of both — are springing up all over the internet, as are tributes and retrospectives. Producers Ron Moore and David Eick held a Q&A session after the finale to discuss certain aspects of the story and spell out the final status of several plot lines. Fans of the show will have a chance to see the Cylon side of the story this fall in a two-hour TV movie titled "The Plan," and we've previously discussed the spin-off prequel series, Caprica, the pilot for which will come out on April 21st. Be warned: these links and the following discussion will contain spoilers.

852 comments

  1. it rocked by Maserati · · Score: 0, Troll

    excellent ending

    --
    Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    1. Re:it rocked by Davemania · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The god explanation is such a cop out. It doesn't explain Kara or why it doesn't just try and influence or outright stop the genocide in the first place. I thought up to the Opera house scene, it was great and when Galen went nuts (he couldn't control his emotion when the fate of two civilization are in stake ?), there was just more questions raised than answers from that point on.

    2. Re:it rocked by JCY2K · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yes, yes it did; except for all of the unanswered questions. 1) What the hell was Starbuck? 2) How did future Baltar and Six 'talk' to present Six and Baltar? 3) How the frak did they find new Earth? Deus Ex Machina much? Also there's the question that's raised but not answered of why would everyone vote to give up all technology more advanced than a pointy stick and live with prelingual natives which was a major wtf... In brief, it tied up some but all of the strings (mostly the emotional and not the intellectual) into a bow. P.S. May have cried a little when Roslyn died.

    3. Re:it rocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      All three of those questions were answered. You just didn't pay attention.

    4. Re:it rocked by Macgruder · · Score: 1

      I caught the answers to 2 and 3. But what about #1? That one escaped me.

      --
      I'm not crazy,I'm actively irresponsible.
    5. Re:it rocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      1) She's god. 2) They are angels. 3) God showed them the way through the song and Kara.
      Deus Ex Machina is exactly what happened. In the most literal sense possible.

      As for the technology, I think I understood the choice. I'm not saying I agree with it, but I think I understood why they chose the way they did.

      PS. I'm not crying, I just have something in my eye

    6. Re:it rocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Angel - with a usually dirty face and potty mouth?

    7. Re:it rocked by Trillan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, Deus Ex Machina requires the resolution to drop in that moment, without story support. God suddenly appears, and fixes things.

      That's not at all what BSG did. BSG pre-seeded their resolutions a year or more in advance. Sure, they were miracles, but they were miracles we'd been told a year ago would happen, all the finale did was show us exactly how they happened.

      You can not like the way it was resolved, but that doesn't mean it was Deus Ex Machina.

    8. Re:it rocked by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The god explanation is such a cop out.

      Choices to tie together a rambling, make it up as you go jumble of story bits:
      1. God did it.
      2. It was all a dream.
      3. To be continued... in a new series!

    9. Re:it rocked by Chyeld · · Score: 3, Funny

      Seemed fairly obvious to me:Jesus.

      Died, resurrected, then ascended once the job was done.

    10. Re:it rocked by colenski · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My interpretation is that Kara Thrace was an angel or a guide sent by God. The foreshadowing for this was provided a few episodes back, when Kara gave Adama an angel figurine for the prow of the model ship he was building in his quarters.

    11. Re:it rocked by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

      She was dead. But she still had a mission to carry out, so she did it.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    12. Re:it rocked by patro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      excellent ending

      No, it was a mess. Deus ex machina is the easy way out.

    13. Re:it rocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you have the Futurama option of destroying the universe.

    14. Re:it rocked by TrevorB · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ron Moore doesn't like being called that...

      (Honestly, the "guiding force" being the dude reading National Geographic in the last scene explains a lot)

    15. Re:it rocked by Nitar · · Score: 1

      No, it was excellent. That wasn't Deus Ex Machina. You could tell that they planned for this ending. They didn't just drop it in there because they couldn't figure out how else to end it.

    16. Re:it rocked by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was expecting a Terminator to pop up at the end to replace the Cylons. As the angelic Number Six said (paraphrase), "If a complex system is run long enough, something different is bound to happen."

    17. Re:it rocked by fracai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The god explanation is such a cop out.

      I thought the "You know it doesn't like that name." was a nice touch and opened it up quite a bit more than just "God did it".

      --
      -- i am jack's amusing sig file
    18. Re:it rocked by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The god explanation is such a cop out. It doesn't explain Kara or why it doesn't just try and influence or outright stop the genocide in the first place.

      You're trying to hard to dislike the finale. Why not accept that the other participant in this cycle isn't actually all-powerful. It can influence, prod, and manipulate. It can pull of events that appear miraculous, but perhaps there's a scale concern.

      Better yet, doesn't it make artistic sense that this is about free will? The other influenced the colonials and Cylons to choose differently. It didn't force them, or deny them choice. It educated them. Powerful message there.

      I thought up to the Opera house scene, it was great and when Galen went nuts (he couldn't control his emotion when the fate of two civilization are in stake ?), there was just more questions raised than answers from that point on.

      One of the strongest themes of the BSG series has been that "people are people". The writers have never shied away from an opportunity to show characters behaving in very human ways. Vengeful, spiteful, angry Tyrol being overwhelmed by the moment? Very much in character. This is the guy who (while half-awake) beat Cally's face in because of a few bad dreams. This is the guy who killed an Eight to help Boomer escape. This is the guy who lost his rank and the respect of Adama because he couldn't keep it together after Cally's murder. Tori's action has repercussions for that man, and he's never been one with lots of self control.

      Again, you're trying to dislike the ending.

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    19. Re:it rocked by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No no no, it wasn't that God did it, but God led them to the New Earth by using Kara and reincarnating her and bringing her back to life after each time she died.

      God created the 12 colonies, the 13th colony was Cylons, but they killed themselves 2000 years ago as their on creations turned on them. Just like the Cylons on Caprica turned on the humans there.

      What BSG showed was that while God was not all powerful and could not stop the genocide, he was able to lead a part of the Cylons to be good and lead Caprica Six and Baltar with "Angels" that only they could see, and sent Kara to lead them all to Earth.

      That when Humans or Cylons tried to play God and create new life, that life turned on them just as Humans and Cylons turned on God in the first place.

      After they reached "New Earth" which I guess was our Earth 150,000 years ago, their lives were less eventful and they mated with the natives on New Earth to create what we have now.

      This ends racism, as it creates one race, the Human race, the best of Humans and Cylons merged into one, and speaks out against violence and trying to play God and creating new life, which might turn on us and try to kill us all.

      That everything has happened before and will happen again, unless we are careful.

      It is a story on morality, really. We shouldn't abuse technology and create Cylons.

      Caprica is going to show how they first created the Cylons. It is going to be a Frankenstein type story where a scientist's daughter died in a terrorist suicide bombing attack but he had backed up her mind on computer and created the first Cylon in an attempt to play God and bring his daughter back to life. But his partner wants nothing to do with it and leaves. But then a greedy corporation steals the technology to create Cylons as servants for the Twelve colonies.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    20. Re:it rocked by tyrione · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The god explanation is such a cop out.

      I thought the "You know it doesn't like that name." was a nice touch and opened it up quite a bit more than just "God did it".

      Or a fellow writer suggested that to avoid being completely panned by critics.

    21. Re:it rocked by tyrione · · Score: 1

      No, Deus Ex Machina requires the resolution to drop in that moment, without story support. God suddenly appears, and fixes things.

      That's not at all what BSG did. BSG pre-seeded their resolutions a year or more in advance. Sure, they were miracles, but they were miracles we'd been told a year ago would happen, all the finale did was show us exactly how they happened.

      You can not like the way it was resolved, but that doesn't mean it was Deus Ex Machina.

      Just read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deus_ex_machina

      Even It has evolved in interpretation, but it's clear that Ron loves Deus ex machina.

    22. Re:it rocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      excellent ending? purely subjective.
      how this gets modded insightful is beyond me.

    23. Re:it rocked by jjackle · · Score: 1

      I Agree. I dvr'ed it (my wife will have to see it tomorrow night because she had to work this weekend. I think, like the conclusion to Quantum Leap, It answers as much as it lets the cycle carry on.But, most importantly, i think the creators of the show (R&D) want you to interperate your own ending. Here's SOME of my interperatations/dillusions. 1. Were Baltar/#6's at the end angels or gods or just immortals? I assume that they were the ones that appeared to each other. I interperate that, by any other name, they were immortals. And that's how i will refer to them. 2. Kara was either one of them or projected by the immortals for their needs. 3. I assume that the immortals judge us. When man/cylon/whatever, gets too greedy and destructive, that's when they lower the boom: they use us (and our insecurities) to destroy ourselves. Then they can try again. 4. I think that the immortals are trying to raise the race to the point that they grow past their own baggage and can live like the immortals. Maybe even become them. 5. Sometimes what you want and what you need are two totally different things. 6. Some of the shows answers are to be found in the Caprica series. Some found through re-watching the series. Some, like Daniel, are your own choices. Was Daniel (or copy) actually Kara's father. One could intyerperate that, especially since they were both in the same episode. I like that they answerd some questions with questions. I don't think that some 'fans' like the fact that that R&D did not litterally answer the questions with the answers they wanted. "I just want it to be totally my show. If not, I hate it" is a bad attitude and you miss the greater drama. Like the great prophet Lenny Kravitz preaches "Let Love Rule." So ends my sermon. Now I have the courage to move out of my parent's basement with pride! Now i realize it's just a show! Moving on now...

    24. Re:it rocked by Trillan · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia agrees with me: "sudden invocation of extraordinary circumstance."

      Note the sudden. Hinting at it for over a year makes it not sudden. :)

    25. Re:it rocked by Trillan · · Score: 1

      Yes, I think you're right. I would have been happier about this had she been shown at the end in New York, though.

    26. Re:it rocked by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      I thought the "You know it doesn't like that name." was a nice touch and opened it up quite a bit more than just "God did it".

      But that didn't make sense for them since those two mentioned God's plan more than anyone else in the show

    27. Re:it rocked by maxume · · Score: 1

      That ending racism stuff there is pretty wacky.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    28. Re:it rocked by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      It wasn't an angel figurine. It was a figurine of the Aurora, Goddess of the Dawn. It was also more than a few episodes back. It was Maelstrom - the episode in season 3 where she dies.

      I agree that the show is fairly explicit that she's an Angel. But perhaps they weren't explicit, hitting us over the head enough. That's why at the end of Season 3, when Starbuck reappears, they zoom in on Earth, with North America front and center. The staff of the show were worried that if they didn't, audiences wouldn't get that it was Earth.

      Mostly though, this show has done much better than typical TV spoon feeding you info and spelling everything out ad nauseum.

    29. Re:it rocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      If you didn't see that there was a God/gods explanation coming up in BSG, then you really haven't been paying attention to the show. (Then again, I'd say much the same to the atheists of this world.)

    30. Re:it rocked by khallow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, Deus Ex Machina requires the resolution to drop in that moment, without story support. God suddenly appears, and fixes things.

      Foreshadowing doesn't automatically qualify as sufficient story support.

    31. Re:it rocked by Trillan · · Score: 1

      Establishing that such things are not just possible but commonplace in the universe, foreshadowing to the audience and visions to the characters, and having characters tell you all along what's going to happen does.

    32. Re:it rocked by mdmkolbe · · Score: 1

      The god explanation is such a cop out.

      Like a "Deus Ex Machina"?

      *ducks*

    33. Re:it rocked by DataPath · · Score: 1

      Apparently you missed the hints suggesting that religion might have nothing to do with it:

      Angel Caprica Six: "That too is in God's plan"
      Angel Baltar: "You know it doesn't like that name"

      The discussions between the "angels" about the Law of Averages rather than prophecy or revelation.

      It looks more like advanced beings overseeing the development of new species in the galaxy than "God". Which would be semi-consistent with the original BSG, as well.

      And if you follow that explanatio

      --
      Inconceivable!
    34. Re:it rocked by fwarren · · Score: 1

      So are we not to create robots?

      Or are we not to create intelligent robots to use as slaves?

      Or are we to only create robots that are to dumb to know they are slaves?

      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
    35. Re:it rocked by MaineCoon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Throughout the show they only ever conversed with real-Six and real-Baltar. The concept of 'God' was something that the real counterparts they were influencing could easily understand and latch onto; portraying themselves as guardian angels in a way. It made them more malleable.

      --
      Hunt your preferred prey at Aliens vs Predator MUD. Join the war at avpmud.com port 4000
    36. Re:it rocked by Cormophyte · · Score: 1

      But that didn't make sense for them since those two mentioned God's plan more than anyone else in the show

      True. But those two characters, especially the Angel 6, have said a lot of things that weren't true but which the characters needed to hear. In terms of a person's willingness to believe, there's a big difference between attributing something to a guiding force and attributing it to the classical christian God.

    37. Re:it rocked by MrMista_B · · Score: 1

      Man, you make it sound like such a shitty unoriginal show.

    38. Re:it rocked by cHALiTO · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm an agnostic and that didn't prevent me from understanding the religious/spiritual theme in the show, which I enjoyed immensely.

      Just because I don't believe in God doesn't mean I don't understand why religious people do or that I think they're wrong to do so.

      --
      "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
    39. Re:it rocked by Kethinov · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, Deus Ex Machina requires the resolution to drop in that moment, without story support. God suddenly appears, and fixes things.

      That's not at all what BSG did. BSG pre-seeded their resolutions a year or more in advance. Sure, they were miracles, but they were miracles we'd been told a year ago would happen, all the finale did was show us exactly how they happened.

      You can not like the way it was resolved, but that doesn't mean it was Deus Ex Machina.

      You're right, there has been religion in the show for a long time. Since day one even. But it's always been presented in a deliberately ambiguous way so that it could be interpreted either scientifically and rationally or spiritually by the audience or the characters.

      But this time, there is absolutely no rational or scientific explanation for the events of the show other than a supernatural god or gods and angels. The show crossed a line here it's never crossed before.

      The aesthetic of the narrative up until this point promised us we'd have rational explanations for Kara and Baltar's head people, but we didn't get it because the writers wrote themselves into a corner and literally had no other explanation.

      So the suddenness component you require is the unexpected lack of an explanation alternative to god, something the show has never done before. There's always been an alternative possible explanation since the day Roslin gave the order to destroy the Olympic Carrier.

      You can choose to like the way it was resolved, but let's be honest here. It absolutely was deus ex machina.

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    40. Re:it rocked by khallow · · Score: 1

      No. I have to disagree in this case. What you claim was established was not. Sure it was clear that there was somewhere a helpful force, but that it was capable of making a copy of Earth complete with humans or that there were genuine "angels" (whatever those were supposed to be) running about, was not established.

    41. Re:it rocked by johnkzin · · Score: 1

      I agree. Excellent ending. And the people who seem to be railing against it can't seem to come up with anything more than "I don't like God" or "I can't deal with not having 100% concrete answers."

      Kara - angel who didn't know it until the end, or human resurrected and ascended after serving out the purpose of their resurrection.

      The "Head Baltar" and "Head Six" - angels, that's how the "future" Baltar and Six are able to talk to the "past" Baltar and Six. They're not Baltar and Six, they just look that way for purpose of influencing Baltar and Six. When it happened 2000 years earlier, on the original Earth, Anders and Tory say they were approached by their own version of those two beings (only they could see them)... yet, if they had appeared as Baltar and Six back then, they would have recognized Six when they created her, and would have recognized Baltar when Anders got his memory back. Clearly they're not "future Baltar and Six", they're just beings that are presented to Baltar and Six in a particular guise (and we see them in that same guise in the epilogue so that we have continuity of their identities). Probably when they appeared to Anders and Tory, they looked like Tory and Anders.

      I sort of like the "they blended in with the natives" story. For one, it's 150,000 years ago ... not just around the time at which Mitochondrial Eve lived, but about the point when _modern_ homo sapiens appears on the scene (130k - 150k years ago). The "150,000 years later" wasn't some random number, and it's not just about Hera/Eve, it's about Modern Homo Sapiens vs Archaic Homo Sapiens.

      God ... maybe, or maybe just an advanced being. The fact that the two "angels" explain it as being "God" doesn't make it so. They're not themselves the absolute being, so we directly don't know what that absolute being is. Their influence on Anders and Tory is probably why the fleshy Cylons (except Caval) believe in a single god. We know it's a being with a complex understanding of time and systems, more complex that our own linear understanding of time and systems (because it's able to sense or cause complex actions to happen far in the future, and seed into things solutions to those problems). Aside from that, we don't really know much about it ... and that's almost certainly a good thing (stories that try to "explain god" are typically rather hollow, and/or self-serving).

      Which then also carries over to "angels" -- they're advanced beings with a different sense/understanding of time/space/etc. than ours. Divine? Maybe. Maybe not. Maybe "God" and the two angels are more like Clarke's view of "Magic" and such. Advanced to the point that we can't distinguish them from being God and Angels, but maybe they're something else. Or maybe, like the heavy influence of Mormon-ism on the original series, they're a Mormon-ish type of advanced being ("As we are now, God once was; as God is now, we may become").

      It's also something more palatable to me than the original series invocation of divine beings (the crystal ship beings). But it does so in a way that is open to both the original series being very Mormon, or being much less Mormon about it. By not being heavy handed "this is who God really is", they leave it to individual interpretations or musings. And that's a VERY good thing.

    42. Re:it rocked by S-4'N3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Remember... "it' doesn't like to be called God.

    43. Re:it rocked by Cruciform · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I only kept watching the show because I'd already invested two years following it. When they made that final push away from science fiction and toward religious soap opera, it was a real struggle to watch.
      When they were tackling issues like torture, ethics, and the "us or them" mentality the show remained interesting. And then they ruined it by introducing God as an off-set character.

    44. Re:it rocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot:
      4.Time Travel

    45. Re:it rocked by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 1

      Not quite. Caprica Six (the one who ended up boinking Tigh) and Baltar did. The illusory/virtual/"angel" Six/Baltar, not so much.

      --
      "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
    46. Re:it rocked by damburger · · Score: 1

      You can have robots, but you've got to let them choose their own fate - as the centurions were allowed to at the end. In a way, they had already broken the cycle when the humans, rebel humanoid cylons, and free centurions fought side by side in the colony.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    47. Re:it rocked by FooGoo · · Score: 1

      I thought after Kara's disappearance she can back as an "angel" kinda like the imaginary Baltar and 6. She just didn't know it....thats why she vanished in the field with Lee at the end. Kara was the resurrected Jesus like character who brought humanity and the cylons to their promise land.

      --
      People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
    48. Re:it rocked by ucblockhead · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A lot more than a year..."Head Six" was talking about "God's Plan" from the very beginning and Baltar had a "pick randomly and it turns out to work perfectly" miracles in the first season.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    49. Re:it rocked by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Kara was the resurrected Jesus like character who brought humanity and the cylons to their promise land.

      Holy Moses! So, it's like 1,500 years before Jesus was born, he was pre-incarnated as Moses to lead "his" people to the promised land ... you trying to start YAC (Yet Another Cult) or something?

      (The worst part is, you'd probably get a following. People will believe anything if you wrap it up in religious mumbo-jumbo. Look at how many are arguing in favour of the ending, and how it was foreshadowed throught the series, even though the writers admit they were winging it :-)

    50. Re:it rocked by master_p · · Score: 1

      It was a nightmare of Starbuck (the original one). He had ate too much.

    51. Re:it rocked by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh come on, that quip was obviously to create ambiguity so they wouldn't isolate all the fans, particularly the more secular ones.

    52. Re:it rocked by coaxial · · Score: 0, Troll

      Don't insult someone by saying they're "trying to dislike" something, as if somehow they're opinion and feelings are somehow fraudulent. If they say they dislike it, they dislike it. How do you like it if I say that you're trying to find a reason to like that crappy ending?

      No one complains about Tyrol killing Tori. No one dislikes the "people are people" theme as you put it. That's what made the show great. What you're trying defend the overt onscreen presence of the cylon god. That's what is upset people, including myself. It's one thing to communicate through cryptic dreams, and drug induced hallucinations. It's something else entirely to create physical objects out of nothing and then take them back. If you can do that, you can do anything.

    53. Re:it rocked by Walkingshark · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're trying to hard to dislike the finale. Why not accept that the other participant in this cycle isn't actually all-powerful. It can influence, prod, and manipulate. It can pull of events that appear miraculous, but perhaps there's a scale concern.

      If this entity can teleport a fully functional Kara Thrace and a fully functional like-new Viper into space, there is no consequcnce to anything the characters do. Everything is pointless because the magical being behind the curtain can fiat anything it wants to happen. This makes following the story and the drama pointless.

      Also, as mentioned many times, Ron Moore admited that he was just making shit up as he went along. Which is basically how religion came about, so I guess I can see why religious people liked it.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    54. Re:it rocked by Walkingshark · · Score: 1

      This ends racism, as it creates one race, the Human race, the best of Humans and Cylons merged into one, and speaks out against violence and trying to play God and creating new life, which might turn on us and try to kill us all.

      We can all see how well that turned out. What a bunch of crap. Stop trying to justify ex-post-facto a bunch of random shit Ron Moore made up because he didn't know what to do.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    55. Re:it rocked by Walkingshark · · Score: 1, Informative

      Seemed fairly obvious to me:Jesus.

      Died, resurrected, then ascended once the job was done.

      Wow, I totally want to get in a three way with my girlfriend and Jesus now. Jesus is fuckin hot.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    56. Re:it rocked by servognome · · Score: 1

      The god explanation is such a cop out.

      "You know it doesn't like that name"
      One of the themes of the show is that there is an invisible hand at work, and it's up to the viewer to decide whether it be God, the Gods, space monsters, or something else.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    57. Re:it rocked by pabens · · Score: 1

      Remember... "it' doesn't like to be called God.

      Yeah, the singularity running our simulation prefers to be called "Bob".

    58. Re:it rocked by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      No, Deus Ex Machina requires the resolution to drop in that moment, without story support. God suddenly appears, and fixes things.

      That's not at all what BSG did. BSG pre-seeded their resolutions a year or more in advance. Sure, they were miracles, but they were miracles we'd been told a year ago would happen, all the finale did was show us exactly how they happened.

      You can not like the way it was resolved, but that doesn't mean it was Deus Ex Machina.

      It was deus ex machina, with a long epilogue.

      How many "machine" and "god" references do you need to be next to each other before you say it in latin?

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    59. Re:it rocked by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      They killed Cally intentionally so that it would end the way it did.

      That's a looooong lead time.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    60. Re:it rocked by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      Except, you know, for the fact that all that stuff was in there from season 1.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    61. Re:it rocked by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Better yet, doesn't it make artistic sense that this is about free will? The other influenced the colonials and Cylons to choose differently. It didn't force them, or deny them choice. It educated them. Powerful message there.

      I thought it was almost a message to humans about how to behave towards their creations. God created us, and lets us do as we please, but tries to direct us when we've gotten lost. He's willing to let us nearly self-destruct, theoretically in the hopes that we get it right.

      On the other hand, we create and we wish to dominate, enslave and use. We made something that pleased us and wish to give nothing back to it. The cylons, when you get down to it, had no "culture". They needed to be more than machines, but could not be, and all we offered was war. And they learned that lesson well.

    62. Re:it rocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything is pointless because the magical being behind the curtain can fiat anything it wants to happen. This makes following the story and the drama pointless.

      This is exactly why the last episode was such a huge disappointment for me. The show really pushed the idea of plausible and had created such an interesting world. I loved the idea about how this could be possible some day and could fit everything into our world. Then all of it came crashing down when mysticism was used to explain significant pieces of the story. Kara being a ghost or angel? After she was a central character for how long after she died? The Head Baltar and Head Caprica being angles or some sort? It feels so cheap and such an easy way out. All that beautiful work into the world completely collapsed for me.

    63. Re:it rocked by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      They didn't put a name on her, because they probably can't without offending some religion or another. She is a supernatural character, like Head Six and Head Baltar. But she's also not at all like them, and acts very differently.

      I think the best way to understand Starbuck is to compare her with Head Six and Baltar, and the explanation about the nature of the BSG God. Head Six and Head Baltar view humanity as a science experiment, they do not embrace us for what we are. They know of the BSG God and their place in the world. They're detached from humanity and maybe from the experience but they have a role to play in our story. There were other head characters too, I remember Elosha and maybe one other. They had different personalities and roles but they shared these characteristics.

      Starbuck, on the other hand, very much revels in humanity. While she has no idea who or what she is at any point in the show, she seems driven and her behavior suggests she enjoys her existence, even while she's doing things that would make us cringe. She has her role to play, but she never actually interferes with how things play out, always involved but never committed. She seems to be the incarnation of the BSG god gone on a joyride in human flesh.

      I think leaving it a bit of a mystery isn't a bad thing. Disappearing at the end said what it needed to say: she's not human and her job was complete she can't stay any longer. What more do we need to feel satisfied?

    64. Re:it rocked by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      I don't think Kara belongs with Head Six/Baltar. I would think they are of opposite polarities.

    65. Re:it rocked by dhalgren · · Score: 1

      No, the poster just forgot a hyphen. Try reading it as ". . .resurrected Jesus-like character. . ." and it makes sense.

      Torben

    66. Re:it rocked by Serious+Callers+Only · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh right, so a deus ex machina is ok if you mention it earlier on in the plot. Gotcha.

      The plot was confused from quite early on, the scripting was good initially and then deteriorated gradually as things lost coherence. The characterisation and dram was better, and at times gripping, but the cod-religion, silly plot-twists and lack of coherence really put me off the show around the end of season 2, so I'm glad to hear that the ending was just as messy as I imagined, basically '$Diety did it'.

      I'm amazed to be honest that they managed to stretch it out for so long, and that people are still defending it.

    67. Re:it rocked by Fortyseven · · Score: 1

      You can give someone food, or you can teach them to grow it. Probably the idea at play here. Sure, you can do whatever you want to them, but they'll never /understand/ if they're simply forced.

    68. Re:it rocked by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      The god explanation is such a cop out.

      I thought the "You know it doesn't like that name." was a nice touch

      He goes by "Allah" nowadays?

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    69. Re:it rocked by thesandtiger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are making the mistake in thinking that Kara Thrace is the same as everyone else. I don't think she is.

      In some mythologies, there are multiple classes of beings besides just god and people. You have angels, demons, spirits, and any other number of creatures that have special treatment. For example, in Judeo-Christian mythology, Angels are special creatures that can do all kinds of things and yet they don't really have free will - that's reserved for humans.

      So, in Galactica, I thought they did a pretty good idea of making it clear that Kara Thrace isn't like "people" - she's something else. God can manipulate her in any number of ways that it might not be able to manipulate "real" people. Kara was a tool to accomplish something - it just happens that she didn't know what she was, and happened to have a more complex inner life than other tools. At least, that's what makes sense to me - it lets miraculous things like Kara's return happen, but doesn't invalidate the other characters.

      And I agree - Moore making shit up kinda wrecks it, but I think it's actually pretty entertaining to try and figure out how to account for the inconsistencies. I'm not remotely religious, but I enjoyed it as entertainment.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    70. Re:it rocked by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      If this entity can teleport a fully functional Kara Thrace and a fully functional like-new Viper into space, there is no consequcnce to anything the characters do. Everything is pointless because the magical being behind the curtain can fiat anything it wants to happen. This makes following the story and the drama pointless.

      Who says creating what was apparently a temporary Kara Thrace "construct" requires that something be "all-powerful"? We don't know what exactly she was, only that she was instantiated for an apparently intentionally short period of time. I'm not saying that I think this kind of thing is necessarily possible, but if you'd written a story in the 1600's that featured people looking into glass windows and seeing events that happen thousands of miles away, some critic would call it impossible and silly. We call it television.

      Which is basically how religion came about, so I guess I can see why religious people liked it

      Why is it that:
      I can like Star Wars, but nobody thinks I must therefore believe in The Force.
      I can like Lord of the Rings, but nobody thinks that I must therefore believe in magic, hobbits and dragons.
      I can like Heroes, but nobody thinks that I must therefore believe in superheroes. ....and yet liking Battlestar Galactica and allowing for the idea that some "higher power" can be in the story somehow means I'm religious? By the way, who says that this "higher power" is even supernatural? It could be anything, since it's never completely defined and they actually mention that "it" doesn't like being called God. For all we know, BSG's reality is a copy of "The Sims" that some kid bought at WalMart and is running a "god-mode" patch on, or anything else you can imagine.....
       

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    71. Re:it rocked by genner · · Score: 1

      The god explanation is such a cop out.

      Choices to tie together a rambling, make it up as you go jumble of story bits: 1. God did it. 2. It was all a dream. 3. To be continued... in a new series!

      Unless your Doctor Who then you can always say "I'll explain later" and ignore the subject indefinately.

    72. Re:it rocked by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Ancient Greeks believed in powerful gods with human emotions that frequently visited them in various disguises and influenced and guided them. But I don't believe the Greeks thought their lives were meaningless because of that.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    73. Re:it rocked by Walkingshark · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah but if you can create a full human from vaccum, along with attendant viper and the like, then you can definitely create them with whatever knowledge, skills, predispositions, biases, and beliefs that you want. If you create them in such a way that they naturally trend away from what you want them to do, and then punish them for not doing what you want them to, all it means is that you're a sick motherfucker and should probably be put down.

      Or you're bored with your Sims and decided to turn the door to the bathroom into a wall.

      Either way, the problem is that it doesn't make for an interesting story for anyone other than the player. Thats why you don't see a tv channel dedicated entirely to watching other people play "The Sims" and thats why having a supernatural fiat in your science fiction show (as opposed to events that characters interpret with supernaturalism, which I can accept far more readily) is an epic fail on the story front.

      That, ultimately, is the distinction that so many people have failed to make in the discussion of "the God solution" to the BSG mysteries.

      On the one hand, you have characters who interpret things that are happening to them with supernatural explanations. Things like the visions that characters experienced, the "coincidences" that were essentially miracles (sun going nova, the fleet losing power, etc), and the various prophecies. You can have this and still have a good story, as long as you explain later that what appeared to be miracles from the perspective of the characters were actually explainable, rational phenomena. This would actually make for a good story.

      On the other hand, you have a story filled with drama and tension, except in your story world there is an all powerful (capable of creating people and advanced technology without effort from vaccum, capable of exploding stars on cue, capable of transmitting information instantly across spacetime, etc) and all knowing and who can change events at a whim, but only chooses to do so when dramatically appropriate, but with no sense of internal logic or consistancy. In that case your built in magical dues ex can swoop in at any moment and rescue anyone from anything, or not, and the only real question when the characters are in danger is, "Will God save them or not?"

      That, added to the fact that humans existed on Earth2 the whole time, means that the entire "escape" of the ragtag fleet was meaningless. Humanity as a whole was never threatened, and if the crew of the Galactica had never lifted a finger, God would have done all the heavy lifting to allow their "destiny" to come to pass. Either that, or God wouldn't have done anything. Except, there isn't really a God, just the writers, and so what the show boils down to is, "What do the writers feel like randomly fiating this week?" Not very interesting, and it robs the show of all of its tension and mystery.

      If I want a 'Wizards did it' plot, I'll just read the old testament. Its like Battlestar, but with less guns and more incest (but not much more *cough*TighandCaprica*cough*).

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    74. Re:it rocked by genner · · Score: 1

      Angels are special creatures that can do all kinds of things and yet they don't really have free will - that's reserved for humans.

      Citation Needed!
      No free will?
      How did Satan Rebel?

    75. Re:it rocked by genner · · Score: 1

      That line exists becasue his name is Larry.

    76. Re:it rocked by genner · · Score: 1

      Oh right, so a deus ex machina is ok if you mention it earlier on in the plot. Gotcha.

      YES it does make it ok!

      I swear if you picked up a copy of Paradise Lost you'd complain about the ending for the same reason.

    77. Re:it rocked by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      Who says Satan had a choice in the matter? That's what I mean about tools playing parts without realizing that's what they're doing and it seeming to be their choosing. Basically, what I'm saying is that just because Satan (or Kara Thrace) seemed to behave like he (or she) could make choices and do things of his (or her) own free-will, that may not have been true.

      It's a basic philosophical riddle that we all face - it sure *feels* like I have free will, it sure *feels* like I can make choices in what I do, but who's to say that the choices I make are actually choices and not simply pre-programmed actions? Who's to say my angst over making choice a over choice b isn't completely worthless because I don't actually have a choice? I'm simply stipulating that it is possible, in the context of Galactica, that there may be at least 2 categories of beings: those who really don't have any choices and those who really do, and that Kara Thrace may have been one of the ones who had no choice and thus was subject to special rules that don't apply to those who actually have free will.

      I can't give you a specific citation on the lack of free-will thing except to say that in virtually every popular culture portrayal of angels I've run across, angels are different from humans in that they have no choice in what they do in the larger scheme of things - they have a destiny and while they might be able to vary a bit in how they fulfill it, they don't have a choice about fulfilling it. For the purposes of a discussion of Galactica, I'd say "popular culture" is a good enough citation. I'm no biblical scholar - and if it not being the case in Judeo-Christian texts that angels have no free will, there certainly are instances of special beings who are pre-programmed to do all kinds of tasks in other cultures - they're under a compulsion, geas, etc. The idea of special rules for special beings is not without precedent.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    78. Re:it rocked by guinpen · · Score: 1

      The show has crossed the line plenty of times, with scripture causing them to find things by what appears to be out of pure chance, and Roslin's visions. Just because the explanation it supernatural doesn't make it irrational. They've been saying it was supernatural the entire time- very rational explanation given it's really been the only one.

    79. Re:it rocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's giving Microsoft a lot of credit, isn't it?

    80. Re:it rocked by Walkingshark · · Score: 1

      Just because the Greeks didn't believe that didn't mean it wasn't true. In a universe with an omnipotent omniscient power, any descision you make is meaningless because that power can fiat you into not only doing something different, but believing you did something different of your own "free will." You'd never be able to know the difference. If these powerful beings exist, our lives and choices are meaningless.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    81. Re:it rocked by Trillan · · Score: 1

      That's not exactly what we're saying. What we're saying is dues ex machina requires the miracle (for lack of a better term) to be just hacked on to the end. If you establish before the end, it's by definition not dues ex machina.

      That doesn't mean it's a good ending. You're absolutely welcome to hate it. I can totally respect someone not liking that ending. But claiming it's dues ex machina makes you look like an ignorant fool to anyone who knows what the term actually means.

    82. Re:it rocked by Trillan · · Score: 1

      I require it to meet the actual definition of deus ex machina, which has a specific meaning.

    83. Re:it rocked by quantaman · · Score: 1

      The god explanation is such a cop out. It doesn't explain Kara or why it doesn't just try and influence or outright stop the genocide in the first place.

      Clearly it's the Christian God :)

      --
      I stole this Sig
    84. Re:it rocked by Trillan · · Score: 1

      You're using the fallacy of necessity. I'm not buying.

    85. Re:it rocked by Trillan · · Score: 1

      I was saying a year only because some of the elements were only thrown in at the very end of season 3: Kara having the coordinates to a new world. But you're right that other elements have existed a lot longer than a single year.

    86. Re:it rocked by denttford · · Score: 1

      Christ! What new cult? That idea has been around for a while.

      (The worst part is that Slashdotters believe they are experts in the history and sociology of religion if you wrap up a claim in sarcastic mumbo-jumbo. Look how many make authoritative assertions about the history of ideas when it's clear from their errors that they are just winging it. :-)

      --

      Leben Sie jetzt die Fragen.
    87. Re:it rocked by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      But this time, there is absolutely no rational or scientific explanation for the events of the show other than a supernatural god or gods and angels. The show crossed a line here it's never crossed before.

      Didn't Baltar's Head Six (ie, the one only he could see) say she was an angel of God at some point? And here you thought she was lying.

    88. Re:it rocked by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      And you would have ended it.... how?

    89. Re:it rocked by Serious+Callers+Only · · Score: 1

      But claiming it's dues ex machina makes you look like an ignorant fool to anyone who knows what the term actually means.

      heh. Really? Perhaps if you think wikipedia is actually a reliable source of definitions. The original usage from Horace says nothing about 'sudden', indeed, it refers to the use of a previously known god to wrap up a story by solving everything by fiat. Which is exactly what this series did. If you 'establish' it before the end by giving vague hints that Gods may intervene, it's still a cop-out.

      It's intellectually lazy and disappointing. If you prefer not to use the term deus ex machina, fine, but really you're playing with semantics, the original point stands about the ending.

    90. Re:it rocked by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      No, the poster just forgot a hyphen. Try reading it as ". . .resurrected Jesus-like character. . ." and it makes sense. No, because Jesus never led anyone to the promised land - Moses did. If you're going to make biblical allusions to someone leading people to the "promised land", you've got to get the characters right. (gotta know who to blame :-)

    91. Re:it rocked by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      In a sense you can have the godlike being intervening randomly and have it fit in, if you equate it to a completely unfathomable intelligence. Of course, this makes everything everyone does in relation to the god irrelevant, as you never know if it cares or not, or why.

    92. Re:it rocked by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I heard that SO many times in Sunday School ... but when you consider that the bible itself is so full of contradictions that it can (and has) been used to justify anything, and that when a "deadline" passes (like the 2nd coming which was expected by the original followers of Jesus within their own lifetimes ...) - Christianity's just another cult.

    93. Re:it rocked by Walkingshark · · Score: 1

      Exactly. A "god" of that nature would just be a random force of nature, some sort of tendency to chaos. The one in the BSG universe, however, is distinctly interventionist and takes an active interest in playing games with its creations.

      Considering one of these games it likes to play is "Now you commit genocide on each other," the entity that is running human affairs by fiat in the BSG universe is a particularly unpleasant fucker.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    94. Re:it rocked by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Shelly Godfrey.

    95. Re:it rocked by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      Do you know why the Cylons had religion? Because of a single throwaway line from the mini-series, when Six tells Baltar that "God is love". Moore says as much in the Season 4.0 DVD extras.

      If I give Moore credit for something, it's that he's been completely honest about how they've pretty much made everything up as they went.

      The final five? Invented on the spot in season 3 to explain why Baltar wasn't seeing them on the baseship. The opera house? Meaningless. Starbuck as the "harbinger of death"? Meaningless.

      I will remember BSG for many things. For tackling difficult modern day issues like suicide bombing and torture. For some great characters and good show-to-show writing. For slick production values and stellar special effects. But in terms of the big picture, story is king, and they really shat the bed on that one. After all the buildup, all the "all shall be revealed" bullshit, we deserved better than "Oh, god did it" for all their hanging plot holes.

      Time to dust off my Babylon 5 DVDs, for a cohesive epic storyline that actually pays off in the long run, and benefits from multiple viewings. (Which, I might add, has religion and prophecy aplenty, but didn't use it to fill in the gaps of lazy writing)

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    96. Re:it rocked by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      The religion was just a minor branch among all the other stories in the first two seasons.
      After that they just kind of discarded any semblance of parallel narrative and bet the farm on religion. And the show suffered for it.

    97. Re:it rocked by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      KITT will save us!

    98. Re:it rocked by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      You're using the fallacy of necessity. I'm not buying.

      No, but you're using the fallacy of naming random entries from a list of fallacies.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    99. Re:it rocked by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I require it to meet the actual definition of deus ex machina, which has a specific meaning.

      A deus ex machina (IPA: [ËdeÉÊOEs Éks ËmakÊÉna], literally "god from the machine") is a plot device in which a surprising or unexpected event occurs in a story's plot, often to resolve flaws or tie up loose ends in the narrative.

      Such as Kara Thrace coming back to life, her body not being on the planet where her ship disindegrated, and then her third body just vanishing without explanation. Oh wait, there is an 'explanation': The god of the machines.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    100. Re:it rocked by Trillan · · Score: 1

      The only one of those examples that came close was her vanishing at the end of the finale. But it resolved no loose ends, instead adding one of its own. There's a long standing tradition of allowing just this kind of twist to an ending in modern story telling, and if anything it seems to becoming more acceptable.

      The first one that springs to mind is Phone Booth, where the caller inexplicably escapes and gets close to the main character, but I'm sure you can think of a thousand more.

    101. Re:it rocked by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      There's a long standing tradition of allowing just this kind of twist to an ending in modern story telling

      Yup, in fact that tradition has been going on for so long that the name for it is in Latin.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    102. Re:it rocked by Trillan · · Score: 1

      No, you're still misusing that term. It's used for resolution, not additional complication.

    103. Re:it rocked by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      No, you're still misusing that term. It's used for resolution, not additional complication.

      I'm not misusing anything, the people at the SyFyLys station are misusing the concept: it's a botched deus ex machina. Anyway, ask the jeebus crowd, they loved the resolution: God did it; pretty SFX. No questions raised for the, they have that all sorted out.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    104. Re:it rocked by Trillan · · Score: 1

      The term has a specific meaning. You're not using it correctly. You can argue whatever you like about whether it was a good ending or not, I don't really care: you're using the term wrong.

    105. Re:it rocked by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      The term has a specific meaning. You're not using it correctly.

      I am, you are the one mistaken.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    106. Re:it rocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An Agnostic is just an atheist hedging his bets. make up your mind... you KNOW it's just a silly fairy tale. Give in to rationality and reject delusion. There IS NO GOD. Man made him to control other men.

    107. Re:it rocked by cHALiTO · · Score: 1

      I don't know if he/it exists or not. If I had to bet, i'd probably bet on 'no'; but frankly, the main reason I'm an agnostic is that I don't really care either way :)

      --
      "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
    108. Re:it rocked by DrGamez · · Score: 1

      This argument is pretty juvenile. I think our space program sucks. I don't know how the hell to fix it, I just am stating what I feel. Just because you don't like something doesn't mean you know how to do it better than them.

  2. Wonder if it got any better by rackserverdeals · · Score: 1

    I was following the series in the beginning, but haven't for a long time.

    I still have the program set in my DVR but haven't bothered to watch since starbuck ran off to find earth and ran into the cylons.

    The turning point for me was when they used the term "final 5" in the show. That should have been something for the viewers, and maybe the humans to figure out, but when the cylons didn't know who the final 5 were, that just seemed stupid.

    --
    Dual Opteron < $600
    1. Re:Wonder if it got any better by gerddie · · Score: 1

      Well, when you continue to watch it, you will find out that it indeed makes sense ;)

    2. Re:Wonder if it got any better by lordofthechia · · Score: 5, Funny

      ***SPOILER***

      The Cylons reach their kill limit and shut down.

      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    3. Re:Wonder if it got any better by Xiaran · · Score: 1

      But hey we canm always build more Kill-bots!

    4. Re:Wonder if it got any better by hort_wort · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I liked it more in the beginning also. I think they ran out of stuff to write as soon as they landed on New Caprica. There is a shortage of good scifi these days. Oops, I meant syfy. No, I meant syphilis.

      I heard a story once about a dog that liked collard greens. The owner was asked how he got the dog to eat them. His reply: "Well, they're all I ever fed him. He didn't eat them at all for the first week. By the end of the month, he finally took to them." My thought is that if there were *any* other decent space-based show, Battlestar would have been canceled some time ago.

      The final episode was okay though. I think the series would have been better if every episode had been more like it instead of the pointless drama that it turned into.

    5. Re:Wonder if it got any better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That, or they all simultaneously get the Red Ring Of Death.

    6. Re:Wonder if it got any better by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      It didn't get any better.

      The main problem seemed to be that the writers didn't start with a well-defined story arc with a definite ending, and somewhere in about the 3rd season they lost their way. New plot elements were introduced to keep the atmosphere going, whether or not they contributed to or conflicted with what had gone before. It's the kind of thing that happens when a series is renewed for more seasons than there is story. A friend calls this "The Lost Effect". I never got into "Lost", so don't know for certain what he's talking about.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    7. Re:Wonder if it got any better by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but we can always make more killbots.

  3. Serious life question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Ask yourself: Do you want to be just a spectator of other people's imaginings?

    1. Re:Serious life question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awen't we just the cuutest wittle angwy angsty teenager? Yes we are! Yes we are!

    2. Re:Serious life question by Trillan · · Score: 1

      Sometimes, yes, I want to be a spectator. Other times I want to be a creator.

      Life is multi-dimensional. Try to be multi-dimensional yourself.

    3. Re:Serious life question by Angostura · · Score: 1

      "just"? No. Other than that yes.

    4. Re:Serious life question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Awen't we just the cuutest wittle angwy angsty teenager? Yes we are! Yes we are!

      Hey! Don't be so sarcastic - he might start cutting himself.

    5. Re:Serious life question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 meaningful Troll

    6. Re:Serious life question by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Yup.

    7. Re:Serious life question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A hostile response to a seriously useful question.

  4. Battlestar Galactica by Narpak · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I watched every episode of Battlestar Galactic so, with a mix of interest and boredom. On one hand I really life science fiction. Lets be honest, I love spaceships, space battles, people killing each other in spaces, monsters killing people, and most variations thereof. But the "spiritual" aspects of Battlestar Galactica has been a bit of a yawn for me.

    They got a decent production, good actors (for the most part), decent costumes and design, and plots and episodes ranging from very entertaining, to out right silliness and cheese.

    That being said; I will enjoy seeing how they try to connect it all together and I probably will check out the spin-off series if/when it hit the stream.

    P.S. Bring back Firefly ffs!

    1. Re:Battlestar Galactica by gerddie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      IMNSHO, science fiction is not about spaceships, space battles, people killing each other in spaces, monsters killing people, and most variations thereof. Science fiction is about exploring possible technical advances and their implications, as well as human nature in extreme situations and the like. In that, BSG has become really intriguing at times - just think of the suicide bombing at the beginning of the third season. Without the spiritual part of BSG it would have been just another space opera, probably fun to watch, to entertain, but certainly no to make you think.

      PS: You are right about Firefly, though.

    2. Re:Battlestar Galactica by Narpak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      IMNSHO, science fiction is not about spaceships, space battles, people killing each other in spaces, monsters killing people, and most variations thereof. Science fiction is about exploring possible technical advances and their implications, as well as human nature in extreme situations and the like.

      Oh I did not mean to imply that Science Fiction can't be both. I also enjoy lots of science fiction literature that involves no, or only marginally, killing of any variation what so ever. For me Science Fiction means any narrative or story set in a world at a higher technological stage than us. I was just naming the battles and killing parts specifically since it tied into my thoughts about Battlestar Galactica.

      As for the making you think part I like when stories makes me think new things. Unfortunately in this case I have read, watched and pondered about a lot of interesting or outright weird things for what begins to seem like a long time now; so BG didn't introduce me to anything new in that regard. However, if it did for others that is indeed great. A broadening of ones horizons is always a good thing in my opinion.

      P.S. 2 min of furious shouting for Firefly.

    3. Re:Battlestar Galactica by JackieBrown · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The last two episodes wasted two much time on flashbacks.

      Character development was never a strong point in BG and to have that be the focus on the last episodes was a waste.

      On the plus side, at least the president died.

    4. Re:Battlestar Galactica by vlm · · Score: 1

      IMNSHO, science fiction is not about spaceships, space battles, people killing each other in spaces, monsters killing people, and most variations thereof. Science fiction is about exploring possible technical advances and their implications, as well as human nature in extreme situations and the like.

      Yeah, but a 40 minute BSG episode = 10 minutes of special effects as mentioned + 30 minutes of teen soap opera, leaving no time for any of that interesting stuff.

      It also followed the incredibly worn and tired old "sci-fi" formula of any story containing high tech must contain a corresponding quantity of ultra low end mythology and miracles and similar such foolishness. Please. Is there any "sci-fi" out there that avoids that tired old cliche?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    5. Re:Battlestar Galactica by DeadDecoy · · Score: 1

      Please. Is there any "sci-fi" out there that avoids that tired old cliche?

      The twilight zone? Of course, they pretty much helped define the genre.

    6. Re:Battlestar Galactica by Jaryn · · Score: 1, Insightful

      .. huh?

      The flashbacks were what made everything else in the finale resonate. Sure, we've watched these characters for four years, but you can forget a large part of who they are in that long a time. The flashbacks remind you of their personalities and history and relationships and how they've changed (or not changed) since then, as they go their separate ways.

      So very important.

    7. Re:Battlestar Galactica by d'fim · · Score: 1

      Interesting that you mention Firefly.

      Anyone remember last year's hour-long special "What The Frack Is Up With BSG?"

      In it Joss Whedon observed that the BSG writers and producers "got it" that "science fiction is a setting, not a story."

      --
      Adherence to the truth is a form of disloyalty.
    8. Re:Battlestar Galactica by Ravenscall · · Score: 1

      The flashbacks also show that they had a choice in their destinies. Each flashback shows pivotal moments that led to the characters being where they were when The Fall came. Had they made other choices, they likely would have died in the holocaust.

      --
      You say you want a revolution....
    9. Re:Battlestar Galactica by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Good science fiction should be about the People (or Cylons), and not about the technology. A really good example of this is Brian K. Vaughn's "Y: The Last Man", where he explores what life would be like for the last man alive on earth, surrounded by women. The reason for him being the last guy, and why all the other men died, is eventually explained, but its not important. The story, like I believe the story in Battlestar is, is more about the journey than the destination.

    10. Re:Battlestar Galactica by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      For me Science Fiction means any narrative or story set in a world at a higher technological stage than us.

      Some of the best scifi is just us, with something thrown in to upset the applecart. eg. the early Asimov robot books were just 20th century earth plus positronic brain. Stuff like Stargate SG1 started like that too.. just us plus wierd alien device. Arthur C Clarke was the master of this, with books like Rendezvous with Rama (which was and still is one of my favourite books... just don't mention Gentry Lee or I may get violent).

    11. Re:Battlestar Galactica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMNSHO, science fiction is not about spaceships, space battles, people killing each other in spaces, monsters killing people, and most variations thereof. Science fiction is about exploring possible technical advances and their implications, as well as human nature in extreme situations and the like. In that, BSG has become really intriguing at times - just think of the suicide bombing at the beginning of the third season. Without the spiritual part of BSG it would have been just another space opera, probably fun to watch, to entertain, but certainly no to make you think.

      PS: You are right about Firefly, though.

      There /was no spiritual part to Battlestar Galactica/. It was never about that. It was about the Cylons created by man that evolved. The people /in it/ had religion - because people are people - but the purpose of that religion was 1. Because the original idea of the show was to give them a connection to the ancient Greeks, and 2. Because people are people.

      The idea that 'imaginary six' - who gave Baltar blowjobs - is suddenly God instead of some evil Cylon robot-brain somewhere is absurd.

      The problem is, while Ronald D. Moore can do character development well, he half-assed the entire series by not finding his own explanation for things in the beginning. He wanted "shock" and "payoff" and thought purely in the short term instead of the long term, and as a result the longer the series went on, the more it decayed.

    12. Re:Battlestar Galactica by master_p · · Score: 1

      Star Trek made you think without any religious aspect (at least in TOS and TNG).

      The religious stuff is there simply because religion is on the rise.

    13. Re:Battlestar Galactica by roc97007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sorry, after somewhere around the second season, Battlestar just bored the living crap out of me. My wife time-shifts a collection of daytime soaps and watches them in the evening -- which is why she has her own TV in her own room where the rest of us can stay away. But I can't help noticing, as I pass through the room or bring her drinks or occasionally have to, you know, talk to her, that what was going on in her soaps was amazingly similar to the final season of Battlestar, minus the air-conditioning rumble and the occasional fleeting space shots. Arguably the acting in Battlestar was better. But what it shared with daytime soaps, as far as I could see, was the constant, relentless, inescapable sense of tragedy and depression, with scene after scene of people emoting at each other, invariably choosing to misunderstand what was right under their noses if it would carry the conflict on a little further. I mean, I get you, science fiction isn't only about spaceships. But when it became obvious that the show became only about maintaining a mood, and the story arch became completely unhinged, and even the writers admitted that they didn't really "have a plan" after all, the phrase just sounded cool, the show just wandered in whatever direction would maximize lugubrious drama.

      But I'm one of those people who just don't understand the appeal of soap operas, who can't fathom why housewives love to cry into their hankies every weekday at 2:30, so your mileage may vary.

      I am *not* suggesting that they needed a Boxy and Dagnabbit to lighten the mood. God, no. That would have made it unbearable. More unbearable.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    14. Re:Battlestar Galactica by cryptoluddite · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Without the spiritual part of BSG it would have been just another space opera, probably fun to watch, to entertain, but certainly no to make you think.

      But the spiritual part of it is what makes you NOT think. The episodes about torture of cylons, that made you think. The episodes about maintaining government, that made you think. The episodes about their despair and how they coped with it, that made you think. The questions of what you do with a person in charge forced to betray their people, that made you think. All the bad decisions people made because of their human emotions, that made you think.

      But the episodes and stories about the gods and their plan... how does that make you think at all? You just listen to the story of it and that's it.

      And for that matter, in the end, there's a monotheistic Christian-ish god, visions, angels, an afterlife, and a divine plan. Yeah, something to think about all right... basically the whole series turned out to be a really long episode of Touched by an Angel. No thanks.

    15. Re:Battlestar Galactica by kv9 · · Score: 1

      Had they made other choices, they likely would have died in the holocaust.

      you mean, like, stay sober?

    16. Re:Battlestar Galactica by kv9 · · Score: 1

      The episodes about torture of cylons, that made you think. The episodes about maintaining government, that made you think. The episodes about their despair and how they coped with it, that made you think. The questions of what you do with a person in charge forced to betray their people, that made you think. All the bad decisions people made because of their human emotions, that made you think.

      all these things made me think what a fucking boring show this has become. I started watching BSG because of the multiple story arcs and general epicness of it all. then it turned into a bad acting drama in which the writers/directors feel the need to show us how edgy and deep they are with all the real-life parallels drawn. thanks. this is why I'm interested in SF, because I want to see the-social-issues-du-jour... IN SPACE! I'm amazed they didn't find time to throw a little 'zomg teh economies!!11' in there before the finale. good fucking riddance. (yes, I will watch Caprica).

    17. Re:Battlestar Galactica by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      TOS had more than one religious show.

      Remember.. they worship the Son.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    18. Re:Battlestar Galactica by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      And for that matter, in the end, there's a monotheistic Christian-ish god, visions, angels, an afterlife, and a divine plan.

      All of those things, except the afterlife, have been there since the first goddamn season. I find it hard to blame the show when they've been consistent about this stuff, and it's just now that you're picking on them.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    19. Re:Battlestar Galactica by gerddie · · Score: 1

      Well, technically I should now reply to like ten posts with the same answer ;) I'm not a native English speaker, and maybe, I got the meaning of "spiritual" wrong - I couldn't care less about God's plan, divine beings, and all that (something that really put me off DS9 and the later parts of Babylon 5).
      However, in my dictionary, "spiritual" is synonymous to "intellectual" and that's what I actually meant, that's what I was referring to by mentioning the about the suicide bombers, and, of course, I also meant the stuff you wrote about.
      As for the end (as in the last two minutes) - if anything it made me laugh.

    20. Re:Battlestar Galactica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star Trek made you think without any religious aspect (at least in TOS and TNG).

      Not-even-halfway-though-the-first-season epic fail.

    21. Re:Battlestar Galactica by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      IMNSHO, science fiction is not about spaceships, space battles, people killing each other in spaces, monsters killing people, and most variations thereof. Science fiction is about exploring possible technical advances and their implications, as well as human nature in extreme situations and the like.

      Which is why the station is renaming itself SyFy, just so it's completely clear that they no longer have any interest in anything resembling real science fiction.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    22. Re:Battlestar Galactica by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      But what it shared with daytime soaps, as far as I could see, was the constant, relentless, inescapable sense of tragedy and depression, with scene after scene of people emoting at each other, invariably choosing to misunderstand what was right under their noses if it would carry the conflict on a little further.

      Consider: "What Shakespeare and Sophocles and their ilk shared with daytime soaps, as far as I could see, was the constant, relentless, inescapable sense of tragedy and depression, with scene after scene of people emoting at each other, invariably choosing to misunderstand what was right under their noses if it would carry the conflict on a little further."

      You -- and many others who prefer science fiction heavy on the technical and short on the human -- seem to have confused actual human drama with the shallow facsimile presented in soap operas, and therefore classify any attempt to portray and explore human behavior as "soap opera".

      We can certainly argue about whether BSG, or Shakespeare, or Sophocles, did it well. But I'm saddened to see how many people want more space battles and less human moments. The greatness of science fiction is that it lets a competent author create any setting desirable to explore the deep issues; the weakness is that is lets a bad author create a setting so full of shiny distractions that you don't notice the shallowness.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    23. Re:Battlestar Galactica by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > You -- and many others who prefer science fiction heavy on the technical and short on the human -- seem to have confused actual human drama with the shallow facsimile presented in soap operas, and therefore classify any attempt to portray and explore human behavior as "soap opera".

      Except that I don't necessarily prefer "science fiction heavy on the technical and short on the human". The last three Star Wars movies just bored the living crap out of me, and I still want my money back for that stupid Clone Wars movie. There are many other choices besides (a) constant mindless space battles and (b) constant mindless maudlin emoting. Moving General Hospital to space doesn't make it science fiction.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    24. Re:Battlestar Galactica by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      At any point in humanity's history, there are people that believe in the supernatural and allow those beliefs to influence their actions. Just like real people, the characters in BSG have varying beliefs, and their levels of belief wax and wane based on their experiences. They would've been less human if some of them didn't have illogical, against-the-evidence beliefs.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    25. Re:Battlestar Galactica by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Religion is on the rise? Really? I've seen assertions more than once that religion was waning, and that it was on the verge of dropping off the planet altogether.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    26. Re:Battlestar Galactica by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Let me add on to that a little. My main objection, head and shoulders above any other, is how STUPID the characters were. There were just too many times when people ignored what was in the front of their own faces, or neglected to ask the one frakken question that any practical person would ask. These characters -- on both sides of the conflict -- were supposed to be the best and the brightest of their races, and they all, every single one of them, were a tragic waste of skin. It was infuriating. I kept yelling at the tv "Oh, so you're UNHAPPY? Well, you DESERVE IT. You're TOO STUPID TO LIVE." After awhile my voice got hoarse so I stopped watching the show. If you want to have drama, fine. No disagreements there -- I don't ever want to see a mechanical daggit again. But make it real. Show me characters who are actually using their brains, not just mouthing whatever misunderstanding is necessary to carry the plot forward.

      This factor is what makes Battlestar Galactica bad science fiction. If it were instead a crime drama, it'd be a bad crime drama. If it were a medical show, it'd be a bad medical show. And if it were a soap opera, it'd be a standard soap opera because they're all like that.

      And for God's sake, pick up the pace! Nobody talks like that.

      "statement"

      pause pause pause, look deep into the others eyes

      "response"

      pause pause pause mug for the camera wait wait

      ...it just sucks the air out of the room. You could eliminate a whole season just by editing conversations to the standard give-and-take of normal humans. GAAaaaah. Yeah, I'm not frustrated or anything.

      So if you read that and still think what I really wanted was more lightsabers, well, fine. I'm sure you'll love Caprica. Maybe I'll go read a book instead.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    27. Re:Battlestar Galactica by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > In it Joss Whedon observed that the BSG writers and producers "got it" that "science fiction is a setting, not a story."

      Yeah, they got that part. There's so many other things that they did not get.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    28. Re:Battlestar Galactica by stuktongue · · Score: 1

      "The story ... is more about the journey than the destination."

      I agree 100 percent. And, as I think about it, I think that it was probably not possible to engineer a conclusion to the story that was really satisfying, at least not if it involved actually reaching a destination. Of course, in my opinion, it certainly didn't help that so many story elements of seeming significance were constructed and, ultimately, not resolved in the manner BSG had typically dealt with things. By that, I mean in terms of human resolutions, and not supernatural/religious ones.

      Yes, I know that religious themes existed throughout the series. I was never a fan of that aspect of the show... in particular, the parts dealing with Baltar's religious stuff. Maybe it's different strokes for different folks, and that's fine... but I never dug that stuff, so it is little consolation to me that any of that fed into the ending.

      I have read through a lot of postings here in my attempt to synthesize an understanding of the ending that would lead to a greater sense of satisfaction, so that I could walk away from BSG a happier camper. That a few folks have been able to explain/justify some of the show's ending is interesting to me, but it doesn't really improve my opinion of the ending. I'm a fairly smart guy, with eyes and ears and a brain, and I've watched a lot of movies and TV in my day; I know the difference between good movie and TV endings and the not-so-good... seldom do I need to have the good examples explained to me. Perhaps sometimes I gain additional insight from others' explanations, but it just adds to my already-developed opinion. I can't help but conclude that BSG missed the mark to a significant extent... despite whatever merits it had, I think their "wing it" approach to writing the series painted them into a corner they couldn't get out of without resorting to something that basically smells like deus ex machina, even if it doesn't meet all of the criteria in some strict sense.

      Having said all that, I will conclude by saying that, for the most part, I like how they terminated each of the individuals' storylines... the execution, if you will. The acting has always been pretty good, and I was satisfied with that aspect of the finale. It's just the overall sense of story conclusion that left me wanting something different/better.

    29. Re:Battlestar Galactica by lazyl · · Score: 1

      For me Science Fiction means any narrative or story set in a world at a higher technological stage than us.

      It's disappointing that the common definition of science fiction has degenerated so much. In classic science fiction the technology or science plays a central role in the story; it's not just part of the backdrop. If you can take the story and, without losing the central theme, re-write it in an alternate setting without the science and tech aspects then it's not real science fiction.

      Philip K. Dick's 'Minorty Report' and Issac Asimov's 'I Robot' are good examples of classic science fiction. The story requires the technology. OTOH, Star Wars and most episodes of Star Trek (varies by series) are, imo, examples of stories which should not rightly be called science fiction since they could easily be rewritten in another setting and still retain the core themes and plot points.

      --
      Aw crap, ninjas!
    30. Re:Battlestar Galactica by Narpak · · Score: 1

      It's disappointing that the common definition of science fiction has degenerated so much. In classic science fiction the technology or science plays a central role in the story; it's not just part of the backdrop. If you can take the story and, without losing the central theme, re-write it in an alternate setting without the science and tech aspects then it's not real science fiction.

      I guess I both agree and disagree. I like good stories and I don't really care about what genre it is or is supposed to be. But I wouldn't mind calling it Speculative Fiction if that makes you feel more comfortable. Though I reckon, to me, Science Fiction will always be anything that involves Science either as a backdrop or as an intricate part of the story itself.

      Saying that Star Wars (and other stories) shouldn't be called Science Fiction since they could be told in other settings, seems like unnecessary purism.

      As for the degeneration of "the common definition" I guess that depends which of the common definitions you subscribe to. Dictionary.com for instance list (among the definitions)
      "Science fiction n. A literary or cinematic genre in which fantasy, typically based on speculative scientific discoveries or developments, environmental changes, space travel, or life on other planets, forms part of the plot or background.
      Which leaves the definition pretty wide.

    31. Re:Battlestar Galactica by lazyl · · Score: 1

      Saying that Star Wars (and other stories) shouldn't be called Science Fiction since they could be told in other settings, seems like unnecessary purism.

      I do think that Star Wars shouldn't be categorized in the same genre as classic science fiction but "can't be told in other settings" was a poor attempt at a definition. See my comment below.

      I guess that depends which of the common definitions you subscribe to

      I don't really subscribe to any one line definitions even though I tried to give one in my last post. To really understand the genre you would have to go to the book store and buy an anthology or two of classic science fiction stories (most are short stories) and just sit down and read. To try and distill a definition of the genre down to one or two lines is something that dictionary writers need to do but that doesn't mean they're accurate. I would say that's actually true for all literary genres. You can't understand what any genre, be it sci-fi, drama, western, horror, or anything really is unless you read it.

      p.s. I don't mean to imply that I don't like Star Wars. It's actually one of my favorite movies.

      --
      Aw crap, ninjas!
  5. SPOILER! by Samschnooks · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is what happens. It is discovered that all of the survivors are Cylons (How else are they to reproduce with one another?!). Then then give up the war, sing Kumbaya, and live happily ever after. Execpt for Cmdr Adama; he commits suicide after discovering that he is what he most hates in the Universe.

  6. Five minutes too long by NormalVisual · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The finale was reasonably good, but I would have preferred the last scene to have been Adama on top of the hill next to Laura's grave. What follows after that, although necessary to explain the existence of the "imaginary" Gaius/Six characters, seemed awfully cheesy to me. I'm talking "Galactica 1980" cheesy. I also didn't find the universal acceptance of the "hey, let's discard every scrap of technology and be cavemen!" idea to be realistic or practical in the least.

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    1. Re:Five minutes too long by BigBuckHunter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The finale was reasonably good, but I would have preferred the last scene to have been Adama on top of the hill next to Laura's grave.

      Agreed. I wish that they would have kept the suspended disbelief unexplained, much like the force was before metacloriates (blame firefox for not having a star-wars enabled spell checker). The god thing was a major cop-out for those of us that don't believe in magic.

      BBH

    2. Re:Five minutes too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd have ended it even earlier, with adama still in the raider.

      If you aren't going to explicitly show adama fly into the sun, at least let me believe thats what he did. Why would he want to live the rest of his life away from society, including his son? Why would he want to leave a raptor there for someone else to find?

    3. Re:Five minutes too long by Ultra64 · · Score: 1

      The god thing was a major cop-out for those of us that don't believe in magic.

      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. You can believe they were uber-advanced aliens if you want. Probably the original series' "Beings of Light".

    4. Re:Five minutes too long by Shrubbman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The finale was reasonably good, but I would have preferred the last scene to have been Adama on top of the hill next to Laura's grave.

      I would have stopped it at Kara kissing Anders goodbye and the fleet flying off into the sun, butthat's just me.

    5. Re:Five minutes too long by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1, Troll

      I'm talking "Galactica 1980" cheesy. I also didn't find the universal acceptance of the "hey, let's discard every scrap of technology and be cavemen!" idea to be realistic or practical in the least.

      This was my general reaction to the whole series.

      The difference here was that I didn't have to put up with a solid hour of bad lighting and claustrophobic camera work. I tuned in just to watch the thing die, and much to my surprise, I actually quite enjoyed the show for the first time, thanks to a liberal dose of Green and Blue. Other than that, the show was still "Stupid and Uninsightful" masquerading as "Intelligent". (Just pretend we're shooting "West Wing" and people will think it's clever, and they'll even swallow the whole, "Bad things happen to Good people more Often than they Don't" line of B.S..)

      Still, congrats where congrats are due: It's VERY impressive when a series of such high production values sees itself through and ends on a strong note. Based on that, I can almost forgive the fact I hated practically every inch of it from the get-go, but somehow I suspect the two things are related. Formula applied after watching the first half dozen episodes of a series: "If I REALLY like it, it will have to struggle to survive or be Doctor Who, (which like the Muppet Show, exists in its own category where silly walks are cool). If I REALLY hate it, it will get lots of seasons, win too many awards and within four years it will be honored by the freekin' U.N. of all places while I quietly simmer in disgust."

      Angels? You should all be embarrassed.

      -FL

    6. Re:Five minutes too long by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      First: if you actually paid attention, they weren't discarding "every scrap" of technology by any means. Adama kept a Raptor, for Gods' sakes! Most people brought "supplies". They were just discarding the large scale stuff.

      Tell me which is more practical:

      * Try to make a city out of remnants of technology that is falling apart and cannot be replaced without any real knowledge of agriculture, etc., hoping you can get enough crops in to feed 30k plus wherever you happen to settle before winter arrives.

      * Have everyone split up into groups of 1-3 and join small tribes of natives who already know how to survive on the planet, and who will likely greet you as gods.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    7. Re:Five minutes too long by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I find it difficult to believe any parent, even one so opposed to technology as those in BSG, would toss such simple tools as pots, pans, wrenches, hammers, knives, etc. into the sun. Even such simple technology as radios, firearms, lights, refrigeration, and such would serve very useful in assuring survival. I could imagine them abandoning the prospect of returning to space travel but they have established that many of their craft are capable of landing on a planet. Land the craft and use them as shelter for as long as they prove suitable. Even the Galactica, as busted up as it was, could be salvaged for the material for building shelters and tools.

      Perhaps they learned some kind of lesson that would make living out of spacecraft that are parked on the surface as counterproductive but I missed it in the "New Caprica" story arc.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    8. Re:Five minutes too long by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I also didn't find the universal acceptance of the "hey, let's discard every scrap of technology and be cavemen!" idea to be realistic or practical in the least.

      Agreed, it's one thing to say we don't bring the nukes and all the baggage of death and destruction, but cavemen life was often ugly and short. Want to die of a little infection because there's no antibiotics? Great. Impure water supply? Oops. They couls have done a much beter job setting themselves up as some guardian type of thing that'll slowly to steer them in a better direction. But then i think it was five minutes and one season too long, and I was more sure of that than ever after the season finale. It was good, now let it rest.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    9. Re:Five minutes too long by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What about "The Prophets" a la DS9? Or Stargate's Ascension. There they're called aliens. Here they're called angels. It may not be intellectually satisfying to those hard rationalists who eschew any notion of spirituality in SF, but it's a common thread, going back to Arthur C Clarke and beyond.

    10. Re:Five minutes too long by gerddie · · Score: 1

      Actually, I liked it this way. For a moment I was afraid they would end it exactly such a way like you wished for. To me that would have seemed way too pathetic.

    11. Re:Five minutes too long by Wintermute2_0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Agreed. The scene with Adama on the hill was such a lovely coda to a series that had been playing with concepts of death, rebirth, and change for all four of its seasons. But then came those tacky five minutes which were made even worse with the inclusion of stock footage of those oh-so-threatening Japanese robots.

      So, the moral of BSG is that I'm supposed to be afraid of my Roomba?

      The hokey spiritualism also irritated me, but it seems like said hokey spiritualism is now a prerequisite for most televised SF (cf. Lost, Heroes). The networks seem to think the masses need a healthy serving of God with their spaceships and time travel or else they might change the channel.

      Still, the first hour of the was as good as anything the series has ever done. And I liked how the original series' theme music was incorporated into the scene of the fleet heading for the sun. And Olmos should get an Emmy nod for breathing life into a character that could easily have turned into self-parody in the hands of a lesser actor.

    12. Re:Five minutes too long by anagama · · Score: 1

      Option 1 is more practical.

      * Even a small spare backup generator would massively increase the chance of survival by allowing a small amount of refrigeration -- food storage is a serious issue. Heat can also be important.

      * All that metal that was thrown into the sun would make gardening implements. Tilling the earth with sticks is a real bitch. Also, it is so much easier to cut wood with metal saws than with sticks. What are they going to live in to protect against hypothermia in cold areas.

      * It will be at least 6 months till crops come in -- a few items in a backpack aren't going to be enough. Aside from that, while Gaius may know how to farm, I doubt enough of the rest do. That means hunting -- it's going to be hard to make hunting effective hunting tools without other tools and even harder to learn how to hunt.

      * Medicine/splints/etc. -- A simple thing like a broken arm will become life threatening.

      * Small groups are less likely to survive because people would actually have to rely on each other to a larger degree -- one person breaks an arm, they all die. As for the tribes, the greater liklihood is a flip out and killing spree. These people are outsiders and not being members of the tribal group, likely to be seen as enemies.

      This could go on and on. The whole "chuck everything" bit was really hard to swallow.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    13. Re:Five minutes too long by peragrin · · Score: 1

      >>I also didn't find the universal acceptance of the "hey, let's discard every scrap of technology and be cavemen!" idea to be realistic or practical in the least.

      practical yes, realistic, yes.

      You must remember they can't produce a whole lot more new tech anyways. they couldn't build anything much more complicated than than pumps, etc. With all the equipment they left behind on all the places they visited equipment wise They just didn't have enough. The people while they had tech weren't designing new clothes, they weren't living much differently than cave people anyways. A chance to start over without struggles is something that they needed.

      For the geeks living in their basements. imagine that you couldn't order any new games, or computer parts. after a while even your boredom would cause you to go outside and try something new.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    14. Re:Five minutes too long by FuturePastNow · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Right, and I got the impression that the show's God (since "it doesn't like to be called that" as Angel Six said) falls into that sufficiently advanced category. Perhaps an ascended survivor of a much earlier cycle of death and rebirth, who still takes interest in the process.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    15. Re:Five minutes too long by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      I also didn't find the universal acceptance of the "hey, let's discard every scrap of technology and be cavemen!" idea to be realistic or practical in the least.

      After 4 years fleeing from genocidal, nuclear-armed, software-hacking, technological abominations chasing me through the empty expanse of space you might think differently. The survivors in BSG have been fighting against the fruits of technology, why would go right back to building a technological civilization?

      Moreover, the fleet does not have the requisite technology to rebuild an entire civilization. It was already straining credulity that Adama continued to have whiskey and the doc continued to have cigarettes long after the supplies should have run out. They conveniently had a mining ship and a farming ship, ok I'll buy that for the time being, but their supply of the rudimentary things that make society keep going had to give out eventually. Shit, I was sort of pissed that they had a bunch of steel lying around to repair Galactica -- reminded me of Voyager where every episode a new shuttlecraft would appear.

      That said, it would have been entirely appropriate if a few civilians decided to take their ships and jump off in some random direction.

    16. Re:Five minutes too long by anagama · · Score: 1

      I was disappointed in how it ended up falling into the "Sci-Fear" subcategory of Sci-Fi, you know, the "technology is bad, stop the mad scientists, they're all out to get us" type.

      While true that technology does help people do bad things, the amount of people helped in positive ways is vastly larger. Farming is a great example of the practical aspects of technology, but one which we take for granted. With no tools of any kind, it's a 24/7 exercise in bone breaking labor for scant rewards -- with effective tools, starvation isn't a constant companion.

      Yet in BSG, technology is so bad they have to chuck it into the sun. Lame Sci-Fear.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    17. Re:Five minutes too long by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      I was expecting them to build the pyramids. That would have been a neat way to connect things.

    18. Re:Five minutes too long by hemp · · Score: 1

      So, the moral of BSG is that I'm supposed to be afraid of my Roomba?

      Yes, the moral of BSG is that the Unabomber is correct. Technology is evil.

      --
      Skip ------ See the latest from http://www.anArchyFortWorth.com
    19. Re:Five minutes too long by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      The networks seem to think the masses need a healthy serving of God with their spaceships and time travel or else they might change the channel.

      I wouldn't mind the spiritual side but they make it so utterly washed down and generic that it just annoys.

      Network's treatment of religion in these shows are pathetic enough that it annoys both those who believe in God and those who don't.

    20. Re:Five minutes too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the geeks living in their basements. imagine that you couldn't order any new games, or computer parts. after a while even your boredom would cause you to go outside and try something new.

      What is this outside thing you're talking about?

    21. Re:Five minutes too long by vlm · · Score: 1

      hokey spiritualism is now a prerequisite for most televised SF (cf. Lost, Heroes). The networks seem to think the masses need a healthy serving of God with their spaceships and time travel or else they might change the channel.

      "is now"? What about all the star trek series and movies, all star wars movies... Has there ever been any filmed or televised SF that doesn't contain the hokey spiritualism? It's like theres a censorship committee that requires all SF TV and movies must contain at least one of the following before it will be permitted to be distributed:

      telepathy
      precognition
      (demonic) Possession
      god granted miracle
      telekinesis
      someone on the ship is a genuine priest/wizard capable of DnD style fighting
      Each ship must contain at least one prophet or otherwise new religious leader
      greek gods come to life
      vampricism or lycanthropy
      A theme of science and technology are evil, but we must tolerate or join fringe religions
      Earth/Gaia worship
      Witchcraft

      At least it's possible to publish SF books with minimal interference from the committee or censorship board or whatever it is.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    22. Re:Five minutes too long by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      I also didn't find the universal acceptance of the "hey, let's discard every scrap of technology and be cavemen!" idea to be realistic or practical in the least.

      Actually, that idea is not without philosophical precedent. Rousseau spoke extensively on the subject.

      After an event that nearly wipes out the human population, you're left with two options -- rebuild the civilization, or revert back to the state of nature. If humanity suffered a nuclear holocaust, I'm not sure that we'd be clamoring to rebuild the same society that produced such a horrible event.

      As it stands, the inhabitants of the Galactica universe did have some experience attempting to build a new civilization, and saw it quickly go corrupt at the hands of both man and cylon. After all, the conclusion of the show was all about "breaking the cycle"

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    23. Re:Five minutes too long by anagama · · Score: 1

      Totally impractical. One of the huge survival issues they'd face is food storage. Food storage is seriously hard and getting spoilage -- then starvation -- amazingly easy. Even those plastic footlockers scattered about the ship so they could hide behind them and shoot back at centurians would be immensely valuable. I think the writers must have absolutely no farming/gardening experience at all. You laugh at "geeks living in basements" -- I laugh at suburbanites thinking that a healthy balanced diet in sufficient quantities to last throughout the year just grows on trees.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    24. Re:Five minutes too long by S-100 · · Score: 1

      Maybe that magic was just a technology that you can't explain.

    25. Re:Five minutes too long by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they also didn't leave anything behind to warn their ancestors away from building the same AI that was in the Cylons, so they didn't do jack to "break the cycle" of humanity almost getting wiped out by machines.

      Would it have been so hard to leave Galactica on the moon? Their ancestors are virtually guaranteed to find it there before they have Cylon-esque AI, and you can leave all the warnings you want in it. And odds are it'll be perfectly preserved in a couple millenia. (All the big meteors are pretty much settled down, and Galactica can no doubt still take hits from the smaller ones.)

      I thought the ending was a huge downer. I was hoping for a MUCH better explanation of Baltar's hallucination.

    26. Re:Five minutes too long by node+3 · · Score: 1

      To quote the first paragraph of the post you replied to:

      First: if you actually paid attention, they weren't discarding "every scrap" of technology by any means. Adama kept a Raptor, for Gods' sakes! Most people brought "supplies". They were just discarding the large scale stuff.

    27. Re:Five minutes too long by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      In all fairness to Star Trek, the "greek gods come to life" episode explained away greek mythology as advanced aliens who settled on Earth and were MISTAKEN as gods by ancient humanity. Part of Roddenberry's vision was that, in the future, we'd improve ourselves and advance beyond things like greed, war, poverty, racism, and religion. In fact, he kind of flogged the audience over the head with that occasionally. Remember how profoundly offended Picard was when a scientist once suggested that he set himself up as a godhead and lay down a set of commandments to repair an accidental violation of the prime directive?

      Then, of course, Roddenberry died and hacks like Berman et. al. brought religion back for DS9, even going so far as to make captain Cisco into the messiah... *sigh* and *ugh*

      Wait... didn't RDM have a major part in DS9's writing and production?

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    28. Re:Five minutes too long by anagama · · Score: 1

      I ignored that part because it is completely outside what happened in the show. I'm sure Adama sent his raptor off to the sun. In the end, the picture we get is of lines of people walking off with a few things strapped to their back. The ending was dumb, but it would have been dumber if it was something like "we throw away all technology, except for Adama who keeps a raptor." That would be totally inconsistent with their chosen ending of everyone unanimously choosing to die of starvation and mosquito bites.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    29. Re:Five minutes too long by anagama · · Score: 1

      If humanity suffered a nuclear holocaust, I'm not sure that we'd be clamoring to rebuild the same society that produced such a horrible event.

      While we may not have a wish to rebuild the political system that caused the event, we would certainly want to rebuild a place to live, preferably without a heat source that fills the living quarters with smoke or CO. People would treasure any technology they could find.

      One of Pirsig's comments in Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance comes to mind -- about "back to the land hippies" and farmers. The hippies feared technology, farmers don't because they see its practical application and value.

      The BSG writers are acting like hippies -- how many hippy farms went on to become totally self-sufficient? Not many if any. And even they used metal tools. I suspect that the ending would have been different if the writers had, even once, attempted to break ground for a 1/4 acre garden with nothing but a shovel. And remember, a shovel would be a luxury to the people of BSG after tossing all of their metal into the sun.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    30. Re:Five minutes too long by cskrat · · Score: 1

      Voyager had replicators. Basically the ability to convert just about anything into just about anything else.

      Yes, replication was a cop out. So was almost every other piece of tech in the ST franchise. In the end, it doesn't matter. Sci-fi uses nonexistant technology to explore the nature of humanity under novel circumstances.

      BSG didn't spend too much time mucking about with the implementation details of it's technology; FTL was never explained in principle beyond saying that something spins, the range limit is different on different ships and jumping a raptor from inside a battlestar is a bad thing. Star Trek spent a ridiculous amount of time explaining technology; nearly every other episode involved either a presentation in the conference room or a lecture in the holodeck on some new particle or technology that would some how save the day in that episode.

      BSG tried to tell the story of a civilization that was reduced from tens of billions to tens of thousands overnight. Star Trek doesn't play with the large scale risks like that. No matter how an episode starts, you know that the Borg won't wipe out the earth and the Voyager will limp off to some nebula, repair itself and be on it's way again. On any given episode of BSG, there was a very real chance that the writers would wipe out a double digit percentage of the entire human race, kill or maim a lead character or something else morbid or gruesome.

      I liked both BSG and Voyager for different reasons. BSG took only two sci-fi leaps, FTL and AI. From there they just worked on the characters until all the lead roles became someone different at the end than they were at the beginning. Star Trek was more of a geek thing in that you could pick apart each episode and say that they're using the wrong warp field equation or that ancillary coupler to the secondary plasma buffer on deck 7 was installed backwards in episode 42.

      --
      My God! It's full of eval()'s.
    31. Re:Five minutes too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, the moral of BSG is that I'm supposed to be afraid of my Roomba?

      I came away with the exact opposite conclusion. The whole "this has happened before, this will happen again" cycle has finally been broken, thanks in large part to the decision of the colonials to discard with their technology. This civilization now has robots that aren't going to destroy us.

    32. Re:Five minutes too long by node+3 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Agreed. I wish that they would have kept the suspended disbelief unexplained, much like the force was before metacloriates (blame firefox for not having a star-wars enabled spell checker). The god thing was a major cop-out for those of us that don't believe in magic.

      Wait, you're pissed that they scientifically explained away the 'magic' in Star Wars, but didn't scientifically explain away the 'magic' in BSG?

      The thing that annoys me more is when they are not self-consistent. That's the problem with Star Wars. The Force is a mystical thing, then it's suddenly just some funky magic germs. BSG always had this gods/one true god thing going, which at the very end isn't really 'God' god, but more of an Arthur C. Clarke sufficiently advanced technology god.

    33. Re:Five minutes too long by scrabbleship · · Score: 1

      Either that or some kind of Atlantis tie in, but that would have been just as cheesy as what they did in the actual end of the series as well.

    34. Re:Five minutes too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the funky germs that provide the force powers are called midi-chlorians.

      i don't have any clue wtf "metacloriates" are.

    35. Re:Five minutes too long by glarbl_blarbl · · Score: 1

      I don't think Star Wars was internally inconsistent. Remember that the only people who called the Force a religion or mystical were characters who didn't believe in it. Admiral Motti, Solo when he first encounters it. This is probably exactly what Palpatine wanted when he wiped out the Jedi: no one believes that the immense power he wields is real.

      --
      I use friend/foe to signal strong [dis]agreement instead of mod points. What else are f/f good for?
    36. Re:Five minutes too long by gobbo · · Score: 1

      The difference here was that I didn't have to put up with a solid hour of bad lighting and claustrophobic camera work.

      You missed out two crucial features of the series: they mostly take place on dingy cramped (or weird robotic) spaceships, and they wanted a documentary feel with 'natural' lighting. Whinging about the stupidity of this aesthetic is kind of ironic.

      Angels? You should all be embarrassed.

      Well, if you hated it as much as you claim you didn't watch enough to get the clues that the 'god' and 'angel' beings are not judeo-christian, more like advanced (evolved) beings, as hinted at in the early part of the series where the mythology is drawn out more. The suggestion is that 'angel' is a for-lack-of-better-term label, and nearly the last line in the series reinforces that. It also cements the underlying premise that our ancient and modern religions are based on actual events and enormously ancient beings that are historical, more technological than mythical, and that what we evolve into also becomes our origins. So actually, it's one of the more interesting narrative threads.

    37. Re:Five minutes too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Descendants, not ancestors.

      Johann Gutenberg is, through some convoluted path, my ancestor. My two spayed cats are my descendants.

    38. Re:Five minutes too long by tyrione · · Score: 1

      The finale was reasonably good, but I would have preferred the last scene to have been Adama on top of the hill next to Laura's grave. What follows after that, although necessary to explain the existence of the "imaginary" Gaius/Six characters, seemed awfully cheesy to me. I'm talking "Galactica 1980" cheesy. I also didn't find the universal acceptance of the "hey, let's discard every scrap of technology and be cavemen!" idea to be realistic or practical in the least.

      What does Adama do with his ship?

    39. Re:Five minutes too long by BigBuckHunter · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I wish that they would have kept the suspended disbelief unexplained, much like the force was before metacloriates (blame firefox for not having a star-wars enabled spell checker). The god thing was a major cop-out for those of us that don't believe in magic.

      Wait, you're pissed that they scientifically explained away the 'magic' in Star Wars, but didn't scientifically explain away the 'magic' in BSG?

      No. I'm pissed that they scientifically explained the force, and I'm equally as pissed that they explained the events of BSG as magic (or whatever you want to call it). When I want to see magic, I'll watch LOTR, Harry Potter, Fox News, or The Ten Commandments with Charlton Heston.

      I'm equally as "pissed" at Yanni. If you're going to dress like a magician, and cut your hair like a magician, you should do magic. I can't tell what he does, but the background music at his shows suck.

      BBH

    40. Re:Five minutes too long by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      1) Are you sure that the "supplies" didn't include "small backup generators"? In any case, those things are going to run out of fuel.

      2) There is essentially no way you are going to get crops for 30,000 people with out agricultural knowledge grown in six months. The best shot is to join the natives, who already know how to survive on the planet. But given that those natives probably can only support themselves with a population density of 1/sq mile, this requires spreading out.

      3) Presumably "supplies" included whatever medical supplies are available.

      4) Natives are likely to see the colonists as "Gods" given that they possess technology indistinguishable from magic.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    41. Re:Five minutes too long by tyrione · · Score: 1

      What about "The Prophets" a la DS9? Or Stargate's Ascension. There they're called aliens. Here they're called angels. It may not be intellectually satisfying to those hard rationalists who eschew any notion of spirituality in SF, but it's a common thread, going back to Arthur C Clarke and beyond.

      DS9 was dog ass boring. Stargate's state of Ascension is a well-known, agnostic approach to evolution of Energy but if you recall, ascended humans [ancients], has nothing to do with the creation of species, planets, the Universe, etc., as the Alpha and the Omega.

      Sure they colonized thousands of planets [yeah right], but the Universe and all it's laws of physics, energy forms, etc., were already there and thus there to experiment upon and discover all it holds--to evolve our collective body of wisdom.

    42. Re:Five minutes too long by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Then, of course, Roddenberry died and hacks like Berman et. al. brought religion back for DS9, even going so far as to make captain Cisco into the messiah... *sigh* and *ugh*

      You *do* realize that that is *no different* than the Apollo episode of TOS, right? ie, the wormhole aliens interacted with a culture (the Bajorans) in such a way as to play god. It's literally the exact same damn thing. The only difference is, the wormhole aliens, living outside non-linear time, could actually see the future, and passed that information down to the Bajorans in the form of prophecy.

      It's actually an excellent handling of religion, IMHO, and I see no reason why Roddenberry (your apparently messiah) would've had any problem with it whatsoever.

    43. Re:Five minutes too long by tyrione · · Score: 1

      First: if you actually paid attention, they weren't discarding "every scrap" of technology by any means. Adama kept a Raptor, for Gods' sakes! Most people brought "supplies". They were just discarding the large scale stuff.

      Tell me which is more practical:

      * Try to make a city out of remnants of technology that is falling apart and cannot be replaced without any real knowledge of agriculture, etc., hoping you can get enough crops in to feed 30k plus wherever you happen to settle before winter arrives.

      * Have everyone split up into groups of 1-3 and join small tribes of natives who already know how to survive on the planet, and who will likely greet you as gods.

      What was his justification for keeping one, but everyone else they are supposed to be transported around the globe, dropped off and left to fend for themselves. Ron Moore has no formal education regarding Anthropology, Archeology, World History and much, much more. If he does, he chose to ignore Facts.

      White Men with guns couldn't merge with native tribes. Most tribes, back then were a mix of Hunter/Gatherer and Cannibalism. The bridge between language would create fear and the end of these "invaders."

    44. Re:Five minutes too long by Arterion · · Score: 1

      I figure he probably planted that thing on the hill, wrote "CABIN" on the side of it and lived there until he died. lol

      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
    45. Re:Five minutes too long by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 5, Funny

      "So, the moral of BSG is that I'm supposed to be afraid of my Roomba?"

      It has a plan!!

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    46. Re:Five minutes too long by tyrione · · Score: 1

      Networks are trying to please Intelligent Design and Evolution angles. It's a joke. Religion in this country is hanging on with sheer desperation and the pressure by power brokers in networks to capitalize on both sides is quite clear.

      You would think people in the 1770s who showed the period of Enlightenment would expect to see their descendants more evolved than they, yet would be sorely mistaken.

    47. Re:Five minutes too long by anagama · · Score: 1

      I finally understand completely.

      * Starbuck is the Harbinger of Death because she brings them to earth.
      * God causes them to lose all sense of rationality and throw everything into the sun.
      * Within 24 months, they are all dead from starvation or disease, except for Hera. Hera's immune system helped her survive the first few ravages. Clearly, none of the non-Hera Colonists pass on their genes.
      * During an attack on Hera's group by the indigenous hunters who are concerned about competition for game and forage foods, the band's "Top Dog" decides to keep Hera. Soon after puberty, Hera has a couple kids. She dies before she's 20, but her kids have a better immune system which makes them more fit. Hera thus becomes Mitochondrial Eve.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    48. Re:Five minutes too long by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      Read your history of the Americas. Lots and lots of white men and women "went native" and became part of local tribes.

      Also, in many cases, in similar situations on Earth, with less of a technological gap, outsiders were at least initially seen as gods, or at least potential gods. Certainly in the Americas, where the natives were far more advanced then people 150k years ago and where the invaders were far less advanced than the Galactica crew, the invaders were often initially met with at least some friendliness.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    49. Re:Five minutes too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also didn't find the universal acceptance of the "hey, let's discard every scrap of technology and be cavemen!" idea to be realistic or practical in the least.

      exactly what i was thinking

    50. Re:Five minutes too long by Arterion · · Score: 1

      You underestimate Adama's love for whiskey.

      But actually, if you remember, they made their own alcohol aboard the ships from whatever algae goop the were eating. That said, it's not hard to grow food hydroponically or using artificial lighting.

      And how do you know the Galactica alone didn't have enough provision to go for 4+ years? It's a freaking massive huge military space vessel. How many months of MRE's would you put on that thing? The answer is: as many as it will hold.

      As for Voyager: they have replicator technology. It's trivial for them to pick up some scrap matter then recombinate it into the materials needed to make a new shuttle.

      Anyway, we know they CAN rebuild a civilization, because they've already one it once on New Caprica. It should be MUCH easier to do on New Earth, because they describe the planet as being more resource-rich than even the original 12 colonies.

      If their goal was to prevent AI from being recreated, they picked a funny way of achieving that: allowing the knowledge of all their struggles and knowledge being lost to antiquity or sent off into the sun. The scene at the end kindof shows the decedents of the cylons and humans making proto-toasters. Do you really think they new toaster slaves are going to say "Oh, they are CYLON HYBRID descendants! We won't ever go to war with them!"

      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
    51. Re:Five minutes too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was disappointed in how it ended up falling into the "Sci-Fear" subcategory of Sci-Fi

      That's "SyFeer."

    52. Re:Five minutes too long by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Six months for crops?

      Not really, 2-4 depending on the species

    53. Re:Five minutes too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      er...

      mininova + virtual dub

    54. Re:Five minutes too long by Monkeyboy4 · · Score: 1

      (blame firefox for not having a star-wars enabled spell checker). BBH

      I prefer to Blame Lucas for inventing the word.

    55. Re:Five minutes too long by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      First: if you actually paid attention, they weren't discarding "every scrap" of technology by any means

      I actually paid attention, thanks. I just don't accept the premise. I understand they hadn't gotten rid of *everything*. There's no indication that Adama's Raptor (along with the others) weren't sent on their way into the sun as well when their work was done. It still doesn't change the fact that almost everyone agreed to embark upon a very primitive way of life and with a bare minimum of consumables, and with little to no experience in true subsistence living. One would also assume they brought no weapons with them, in keeping with the stated objective of getting rid of their technology. That choice is going to come in particularly handy in the likely event the natives don't welcome them with open arms.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    56. Re:Five minutes too long by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      DS9 was dog ass boring. Stargate's state of Ascension is a well-known, agnostic approach to evolution of Energy but if you recall, ascended humans [ancients], has nothing to do with the creation of species, planets, the Universe, etc., as the Alpha and the Omega.

      Sure they colonized thousands of planets [yeah right], but the Universe and all it's laws of physics, energy forms, etc., were already there and thus there to experiment upon and discover all it holds--to evolve our collective body of wisdom.

      I don't really see anything other than a semantic difference. One the one hand you have a supreme being that can will the right wave function to collapse and create animals and trees and proto-humans on another world a million light-years away, and on the other hand, you have an all-powerful alien that developed the technology to be able to will the right wavefunction collapse and create animals and trees and proto-humans on a world a million light-years away. The empiricist would agree that in any measurable sense, the two are identical.

    57. Re:Five minutes too long by Schemat1c · · Score: 1

      I'm equally as "pissed" at Yanni. If you're going to dress like a magician, and cut your hair like a magician, you should do magic.

      Guess you thought no one else here watches The IT Crowd.

      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    58. Re:Five minutes too long by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      You missed out two crucial features of the series: they mostly take place on dingy cramped (or weird robotic) spaceships, and they wanted a documentary feel with 'natural' lighting. Whinging about the stupidity of this aesthetic is kind of ironic.

      The dark lighting made it hard to see, and surely was not the only possible way to create a documentary feel. There are plenty of concessions made to accessibility and practicality; do you think the humans of the time actually spoke contemporary American English (with a few British and Antipodean accents thrown in for unknown reasons)?

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    59. Re:Five minutes too long by anagama · · Score: 1

      True, but up to 11 months till harvest depending on the time of the year they landed -- could be really bad for the ones who spread out to cooler climes. Too bad they sent all their glass into the sun -- no green houses.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    60. Re:Five minutes too long by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Maybe that magic was just a technology that you can't explain.

      Maybe that technology was just magic that was too advanced for you to explain.

      Either way, it's a cop-out of major proportions.

      One of the allures of sci-fi is it explores and exploits the human condition. Yes, you can invoke a characters' belief in god in such cases, and explore how that motivates people - but to actually INVOKE god (or a god-like entity) as the final rationale, gives up. It's the ultimate lamer. It's like "the entire last season was a dream." It's ... well, lets just say that it is a failure of imagination, an unwillingness to continue to explore or push the edges, or offend at the critical moment. Coitus interruptus. Finding out that really hot-looking person is your cousin. Lunch-bag letdown.

    61. Re:Five minutes too long by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      Telepathy and stuff can be done right in sci-fi, if you look at something like Mass Effect. The Force in Star Wars had some hokey aspects but otherwise was executed well and put star wars more in "sci-fantasy" than "sci-theology". Sci-fantasy is OK. Sci-theology is just plain terrible. I don't want to watch "Jesus in Space."

      And the whole, "Well maybe god is a really advanced entity" is so played out it should never be used. Ever.

    62. Re:Five minutes too long by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      "I was hoping for a MUCH better explanation of Baltar's hallucination."

      You mean "God did it" wasn't a good enough explanation of you? You seriously think that "God loves you" should not be the end moral of a sci-fi show that throughout never took sides or preached from a soapbox?

      Yeah me too.

    63. Re:Five minutes too long by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      So, the moral of BSG is that I'm supposed to be afraid of my Roomba?

      Yes, the moral of BSG is that the Unabomber is correct. Technology is evil.

      Well, once Tim "The Toolman" Taylor gets his hands on it and adds a 350hp turbine, hedge trimmer, AND a frakking laser to it, yes.

    64. Re:Five minutes too long by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      Finally someone else noted the retarded spiritualism. I was hoping they'd end with a sci-fi explanation for all the "religious" stuff, but nope. "GOD DID IT, AND HE LOVES YOU. WHAT IS GOD? WE WON'T SAY HURRR"

      First hour good, second hour oh jesus christ no

    65. Re:Five minutes too long by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      Indeed, Star Wars' Force was a sci-fantasy element that didn't need to be explained because it was just part of the universe. It wasn't a big central mystery. Head six and Baltar were, and they turned out to just be angels? Everything happened because of magic? The tone of the show indicated that real explanations would be given, not "Oh just God that doesn't like to be called God" which is a huge cop-out.

    66. Re:Five minutes too long by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      And how do you know the Galactica alone didn't have enough provision to go for 4+ years? It's a freaking massive huge military space vessel. How many months of MRE's would you put on that thing? The answer is: as many as it will hold.

      ... because they make excellent torture devices?

    67. Re:Five minutes too long by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      They'd have some machine tools at least. It's possible to use those to produce more machine tools. They'd also have at least some information about how to make things, a vast amount of high quality scrap metal, and why so dismissive about pumps? Pumps are great! You can use them to extract water from wells.

    68. Re:Five minutes too long by Briareos · · Score: 1

      "So, the moral of BSG is that I'm supposed to be afraid of my Roomba?"

      It has a plan!!

      And there are many copies! (For sale, that is...)

      np: The Fun Years - I'm Speaking Through Barbara (Pop Ambient 2009)

      --

      "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

    69. Re:Five minutes too long by coaxial · · Score: 1

      The hokey spiritualism also irritated me, but it seems like said hokey spiritualism is now a prerequisite for most televised SF (cf. Lost, Heroes). The networks seem to think the masses need a healthy serving of God with their spaceships and time travel or else they might change the channel.

      I knew there had to be someone out there that also wants a well done sf show without time travel, psychics/telepaths[*], or magic/god(s).

      [*] I'll only allow telepaths if they're aliens and they can only use telepathy among their own species. It's biological radios, rather than spirits.

    70. Re:Five minutes too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The god thing was a major cop-out for those of us that don't believe in magic.

      I don't see why. Six calls it "God" but Baltar says "You know *it* doesn't like this name". It. For all we know, this could for example be an artificial conscioussness created by men far before the "cycles" against cylons, playing with humans since then (or trying to make them evolve by playing the cycle again and again, with each time a little bit more learnt from previous attempts). It doesn't involve magic in any way (except in the way that sufficiently evolved technology will seem like magic to people who don't know how it works).

    71. Re:Five minutes too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The finale sucked. They killed the show.

      I'm driving to that dude's house right now to kick his ass!
      (read the news - it will take me couple of days to get there)

    72. Re:Five minutes too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After watching one clean the same room a few times, I'm pretty sure it doesn't have a plan. :)

    73. Re:Five minutes too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What will be cleaned, will be cleaned again and again.

      There has to be an end to the cycle.

    74. Re:Five minutes too long by BigBuckHunter · · Score: 1

      I believe that joke predates the IT crowd by a decade or two. I'm pretty certain it was invented by George Carlin about someone entirely different than Yanni. That said, I've seen 5 minutes of the IT crowd in my lifetime and it was a flashback about some ominous looking goth dude about how he came to be goth.

      BBH

    75. Re:Five minutes too long by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      I agree too. I liked the ending on the mountain top, but it felt like the extended LotR where there were endings of endings.... it should have been 1/2 hour shorter and would have felt the same, in fact the cheesy "current times" ending took away from the actual story plot.

    76. Re:Five minutes too long by Brendor · · Score: 1
      "It has a plan!!"

      Must vaccum room; exterminate 99.9% of dust population.

    77. Re:Five minutes too long by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      I liked the BSG approach. The whole point is that you had a society that explored the stars and neatly explained god away while still holding to ancient traditions. They got to the point they could even recreate artificial and human life.

      I think the writers wanted to make a statement people needed a "god" of some kind and that things happen to lead humanity thru the ages. I don't think they wanted to get into particulars of "which" god to avoid upsetting multiple groups they just wanted some "divine presence".

    78. Re:Five minutes too long by kv9 · · Score: 1

      I also didn't find the universal acceptance of the "hey, let's discard every scrap of technology and be cavemen!" idea to be realistic or practical in the least.

      I guess they didn't want any toasters they may have had to turn into another batch of killer robots. yeah, cheesy.

    79. Re:Five minutes too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope it's my floor plan, because that sucker should get it clean everywhere.

    80. Re:Five minutes too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like this one?

    81. Re:Five minutes too long by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      The personification of the god entity in Head Gaius and Head Six isn't any more cheezy than the two characters Daniel and Marty from Chapterhouse Dune and the two other books written by Herbert's son, in which those characters personify Omnius and Erasmus. I thought it was a subtle nod to Frank Herbert.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    82. Re:Five minutes too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah... my floor plan.

    83. Re:Five minutes too long by gobbo · · Score: 1

      The dark lighting made it hard to see, and surely was not the only possible way to create a documentary feel.

      Worked fine on my TV and computer!

      The primary way to get a doc feel was hand-held cameras and cheesy zooms. BSG's lighting was in support of that, but more for emotion and ambience. 'Natural' spot lighting (NOT dark, but very high contrast with lots of dark areas and frequent blown out highlights) and lots of gobos and 'cookie' shade was well used, a technique established in the film noir era, and adds to a grungy, depressing and opressive feeling. If I was working grip or DoP on a production like this I'd probably do the same.

    84. Re:Five minutes too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had always expected they would reveal that all the colonials were actually cylons who'd simply been going through natural birth and evolution for millenia. They never did, but they did reveal that modern humans are all cylon hybrids. Going by the "all of this has happened before" tenet, I'm going to assume that my theory about them all being cylons, or at least part cylon, is correct. Who knows how many times the cycle has gone around. As for the proto-humans on earth, maybe that's where the template for the humanoid cylon form came from in the first place. If everyone is part cylon, that explains the whole god thing pretty well.

      Consider: Cylons are adept at generating hallucinations, many of them walking around in a hallucination while they go about their business. Caprica 6 explained this to Baltar once, saying that she saw herself walking through a forest rather than an oppressive basestar corridor. Baltar tried to grasp onto this as an explanation for his imaginary friend. Cylons are also telepathic among their kind, able to share their hallucinations, and communicate within them. The range has never been demonstrated to be more than the thickness of a pane of glass that I'm aware of, but it could be more. I think it may be much, much greater range (although maybe only subconsciously) because they can return to a resurrection ship across light-years of distance and at super-luminal speed. We know that part-cylons can tap into this, since Hera can do it.

      Some sort of emergent consciousness, or more than one, is where I'm going with this. The god who doesn't like that name is the collective unconscious of both the cylons and the colonials. Baltar and Caprica 6s imaginary friends are artifacts of same, as are perhaps the "lords of Kobol". The resurrected Kara Thrace can also be explained as one of those imaginary friends. Maybe still herself in the sense that she was resurrected just like the Cylons, but not into a real body. I know she was seen to touch a lot of physical objects, fly a viper (which would also need to be imaginary), etc. But given how deep the Cylon hallucinatory ability was shown to be, I don't see that as a problem. I don't think anyone else actually flew her viper. If she got into a fight with anyone, they probably beat themselves up, _Fight Club_ style, etc. In the climax of the colony battle, we see her punch in jump coordinates and plug in and turn the jump key. Maybe it was possession and someone else was actually standing there. I think it's more likely that it was because Anders was plugged into the entire ship, and so the collective consciousness had direct control of the jump drive.

      So, 150,000 years later, we're all part cylon, and part of the mesh network that doesn't like to be called God. Maybe it doesn't like that name because so many of it's constituents are monotheists who think of something very different when they think of "God" and it prefers to maintain the distinction. Anyway, angels 6 and Baltar are still around and walking around invisibly, or at least largely unnoticed, but still favoring imprinted forms, or perhaps those forms are just for the audiences benefit.

      I like this explanation. It may not be what the creators came up with, but it fits all the evidence and seems to maintain some internal consistency. It doesn't directly handle the true origins of the Cylons, though. Maybe they originally did come from Earth, from a human civilization that was wiped out by their artificial creations leaving them to devolve, or be replaced by near-human primate cousins who evolved. Maybe a sicko Cylon like Cavil thought it would be fun to genetically engineer humans back to the stone age, so to speak. Or, maybe some reptilian race made them as servants, and got wiped out, then they traveled the stars, found earth and humans and said, "Hey, I want to be like those guys", developed human form cylons, traveled the stars some more, settled down and reproduced, lived and died naturally until they forgot they were machines, developed sentient machines of their own

    85. Re:Five minutes too long by Neko-kun · · Score: 1

      Hehe, that's what I took away from the whole Mitochondrial Eve bit.

      She was taken away and impregnated by the alpha male. Simple as that.
      Kinda sad but it makes the most sense to me IF they're referring specifically to Hera as Mitochondrial Eve.

    86. Re:Five minutes too long by tyrione · · Score: 1

      Read your history of the Americas. Lots and lots of white men and women "went native" and became part of local tribes.

      Also, in many cases, in similar situations on Earth, with less of a technological gap, outsiders were at least initially seen as gods, or at least potential gods. Certainly in the Americas, where the natives were far more advanced then people 150k years ago and where the invaders were far less advanced than the Galactica crew, the invaders were often initially met with at least some friendliness.

      We slaughtered millions because we outnumbered them. This 30,000+ is in the distinct minority, but more importantly, even Native Americans had language. These were Homo Neanderthals. They were carnivores and cannibals. Neanderthals existed as recent as 24,000 years ago, far more recent than these space shifts landing 150,000 years prior to present day.

    87. Re:Five minutes too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God has a plan for all of you guys.

    88. Re:Five minutes too long by Dulcise · · Score: 1

      "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic". However you can differentiate based on the assumptions each argument makes.

      The difference I can see in the two is one assumes that a race after a large period of time developed technology that we see as impossible. A fair assumption, as we can see this in our own recorded chronology.

      However, you could argue that this ending does fit the series, as it is constantly mirroring western theology, and implying someone knows what's going on.
      The Supreme being makes a much larger assumption, the supreme being must somehow exist outside of the rules that all the other characters live by, and be able to affect those who are constrained by those rules. We cannot see this from our own chronology, or anywhere that has not later been re-explained, and re-attributed to something living within the rules of the system, through investigation using the scientific method.

      This is what I see as the difference between the two, and why for me, any explanation that amounts to "God did it", or "It was all a virtual reality" will be a cop-out (both situations where something exists outside the set rules of that reality). Especially in fiction, when you can make up any plethora of more exciting endings, which fit.

    89. Re:Five minutes too long by Dulcise · · Score: 1

      Wow, managed to fuck that up even though I'm sure it looked alright in the preview.

      It should read:

      "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic". However you can differentiate based on the assumptions each argument makes.

      The difference I can see in the two is one assumes that a race after a large period of time developed technology that we see as impossible. A fair assumption, as we can see this in our own recorded chronology.

      The Supreme being makes a much larger assumption, the supreme being must somehow exist outside of the rules that all the other characters live by, and be able to affect those who are constrained by those rules. We cannot see this from our own chronology, or anywhere that has not later been re-explained, and re-attributed to something living within the rules of the system, through investigation using the scientific method.

      This is what I see as the difference between the two, and why for me, any explanation that amounts to "God did it", or "It was all a virtual reality" will be a cop-out (both situations where something exists outside the set rules of that reality). Especially in fiction, when you can make up any plethora of more exciting endings, which fit.

      However, you could argue that this ending does fit the series, as it is constantly mirroring western theology, and implying someone knows what's going on.

    90. Re:Five minutes too long by jalefkowit · · Score: 1

      So, the moral of BSG is that I'm supposed to be afraid of my Roomba?

      Not necessarily. But if your Roomba waltzes in one day wearing a red dress and high heels... RUN.

    91. Re:Five minutes too long by Scrameustache · · Score: 3, Funny

      Right, and I got the impression that the show's God (since "it doesn't like to be called that" as Angel Six said) falls into that sufficiently advanced category. Perhaps an ascended survivor of a much earlier cycle of death and rebirth, who still takes interest in the process.

      So... Daniel Jackson did it?

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    92. Re:Five minutes too long by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      "The hokey spiritualism also irritated me, but it seems like said hokey spiritualism is now a prerequisite for most televised SF"

      That's a counter-reaction to most of the Star Trek series, where human religion and spiritualism simply didn't exist (along with greed and a number of other foibles that made the humans in the Federation seem so wooden and inhuman). This started with DS9 (where Ron Moore cut his teeth) and continued with shows like Firefly and Galactica. The idea of a humanity without some form of spiritualism seems a little hard to swallow, for good or ill. It seems to be one of those things that's almost hard-wired into us.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    93. Re:Five minutes too long by hughk · · Score: 1

      Anyway, we know they CAN rebuild a civilization, because they've already one it once on New Caprica.

      From what I remember, New Caprica was a tent city - a refugee camp. I have no idea whether they even managed an orderly evacuation of equipment as well as people.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    94. Re:Five minutes too long by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      The finale was reasonably good, but I would have preferred the last scene to have been Adama on top of the hill next to Laura's grave

      That is where is should have ended. Hell, I though it did end there. I had the remote in my hand ready to turn the fucker off when that "150,000 later" year caption popped up. I though here it comes, here is where they fuck it all up. They just wanted to drive the final nail...

      Some writers have this issue, they just don't' know when to put the damn pen down. Aurthur C. Clark just had to keep hammering away at 2001. Phillip Pullman wrote three interesting books in his His Dark Materials series but just didn't know when to quit until destroyed the whole series for some half ass cocked up bullshit about not having happy ending. We won't even mention OSC and Ender.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    95. Re:Five minutes too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      man it is canceled because of its refusal to change the title from "Battlestar galactica" to "U.S. Military in Space".

    96. Re:Five minutes too long by BigBlueOx · · Score: 1

      Ach! I never have mod points when I want them!

      +1 LOL

    97. Re:Five minutes too long by BigBuckHunter · · Score: 1

      The Supreme being makes a much larger assumption, the supreme being must somehow exist outside of the rules that all the other characters live by, and be able to affect those who are constrained by those rules. We cannot see this from our own chronology, or anywhere that has not later been re-explained, and re-attributed to something living within the rules of the system, through investigation using the scientific method.

      But there was no supreme being in BSG. Ralph Richardson was not involved with its production in any way.

      BBH

    98. Re:Five minutes too long by mrdoogee · · Score: 1

      Remember Clarke's 3rd law:

      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

    99. Re:Five minutes too long by GloBug · · Score: 1

      Don't think the robots in the end were meant to be threatening. I took it more as a joke. The whole time they've been touting history repeating itself, but then head six and Baltar tell real Six and Baltar that their furtures should be uneventful. I took it more as history NOT repeating itself. Because our technology is leap years behind theirs.

    100. Re:Five minutes too long by mrdoogee · · Score: 1

      That actually makes far too much sense. If only that was what the writers intended.

    101. Re:Five minutes too long by mrdoogee · · Score: 1

      Mine already subjugates the cat, its only a matter of time until it rises up against me.

    102. Re:Five minutes too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the vast majority of all humans are spiritual in some fashion....and yes, some of it is hokey in real life.

      wouldn't a blend of sincere/hokey spiritualism in TV shows mirror what exists in reality?

    103. Re:Five minutes too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's how I'd spell it if I was texting it.

    104. Re:Five minutes too long by Ifandbut · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure you understand what you are saying. Before they explained The Force as germs it was magic.

    105. Re:Five minutes too long by fallen1 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a FLOOR plan. Of my house.

      Now go clean the carpets before I kick your shiny metal ass, Roomba...

      --

      Dream as if you'll live forever.
      Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
      ~Anonymous~

    106. Re:Five minutes too long by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Just don't call him god.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    107. Re:Five minutes too long by peragrin · · Score: 1

      yet people survived that way for thousand of years. or did the egyptians romans, vikings , etc all have plastic food storage containers?

      Hint refrigeration is only a century old. there are other ways to preserve food. on small scales. the kind that 40,000 people divided up into groups of a few thousand each.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    108. Re:Five minutes too long by gmb61 · · Score: 1

      To me, BSG was really a cautionary tale about the implications that technology can have on a society. The show's recurring theme was "all this happened before and all this will happen again." It was necessary to have that last scene of present day Earth and our current advances in robotics technology in order to show that we could be on the same path as the humans that created the Cylons.

    109. Re:Five minutes too long by Dasher42 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but Nana Visitor's character captured quite a lot of the attitude I thought the population on the fleet would have, crammed into cargo vessels, eating algae. I can see why they'd be pretty fed up with technology. Hunter-gatherer living on earth of 150,000 years ago would actually be a nice break by comparison.

      I'm not kidding. Anthropologists have it documented, a hunter-gatherer works about four hours a day to meet their needs. Hunter-gatherers also had better diets than early horticulturalists; it's a point of debate why anybody stopped being hunter-gatherers at all. There wasn't much payoff initially.

      That part of the show made sense to me, anyway.

    110. Re:Five minutes too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the last scene was mented to explain that all of this will happen again (all that robots) and that cavemen idea sounds good after 4 yours of being attacked by cylons with their advance technology and have porblems with feul and so on just to get away from cylons....for me that would be a good idea....more like a long break on earth (or heaven for them)

    111. Re:Five minutes too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well it kinda does make sense because if they had not ditched their technology then it would mess up the story line because then we would have to have advanced technology like ftl drives and stuff obviously they couldnt say that so they just made something up to explain it.

    112. Re:Five minutes too long by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      the explanation was early on, that Galactica was relatively self-sufficient. Tool rooms to repair ships, fab parts and make uniforms, recycling for air and water and algae tanks to regrow food (from recycled S$$$) in addition to a full supply of MREs. Except Galactic was "mothballed" compared to Pegasus, which was much better equip. So it was already stripped of spare parts, rations, and other essentials to be a museum. The trouble was keeping up the other ships... that's why they needed near slave labor to run supplies of food, parts, and s$$$ back and forth to other ships in the fleet.

    113. Re:Five minutes too long by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Not quite sure what you're trying to say here. No one in Star Wars ever tried to scientifically explain what The Force was. The closest we got was Obi-Wan saying it's "an energy field created by all living things".

      Perhaps you're uptight about midichlorians, the small life form through which Jedi can somehow tap this energy field.

      But don't worry, a lot of people seem to miss the distinction.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  7. Tricia Helfer in Porn? by TheTyrannyOfForcedRe · · Score: 1

    I'm praying that the end of BSG opens the door to Tricia Helfer starring in a few pornos. My god, that would rock my world! Come on Tricia, give it a try. Just one little lesbian scene. All the girls are doin' it. There's even a song about it on the radio. Puhleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeze!

    --
    "Liechtenstein is the world's largest producer of sausage casings, potassium storage units, and false teeth."
    1. Re:Tricia Helfer in Porn? by TheTyrannyOfForcedRe · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'm so lame that I went to google and typed in "Tricia Helfer porn." To my utter surprise and amazement a bunch of hits came up. I clicked a few and found tons of real, topless Tricia Helfer pics. Thank the gods! Made my f'ing weekend...

      Also, how is my comment above -1 flamebait? I could understand -1 loser or -1 pervert but flamebait? Show me one straight male BSG fan who doesn't want to see Ms. Helfer doin' the nasty and I'll show you someone who is either dead, gay, or a robot posing as a human.

      --
      "Liechtenstein is the world's largest producer of sausage casings, potassium storage units, and false teeth."
    2. Re:Tricia Helfer in Porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You didn't know she was in Playboy? I, uh... researched this matter shortly after the debut of the mini-series.

    3. Re:Tricia Helfer in Porn? by morghanphoenix · · Score: 1

      Or maybe just a guy who doesn't like the barbie type. Definatly not dead, gay or a robot, but that woman does nothing for me.

    4. Re:Tricia Helfer in Porn? by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      Same here, Grace Park is more up my alley :)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    5. Re:Tricia Helfer in Porn? by TheTyrannyOfForcedRe · · Score: 0

      My BSG "re-imaginings" don't discriminate based upon age or race. Tricia, Grace Park, Mary McDonnell, and Katee Sackhoff all play star roles.

      --
      "Liechtenstein is the world's largest producer of sausage casings, potassium storage units, and false teeth."
    6. Re:Tricia Helfer in Porn? by TheTyrannyOfForcedRe · · Score: 0

      I did not know! But I do now. Man, I'm going to sleep well tonight!

      --
      "Liechtenstein is the world's largest producer of sausage casings, potassium storage units, and false teeth."
    7. Re:Tricia Helfer in Porn? by Zumbs · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'm so lame that I went to google and typed in "Tricia Helfer porn." To my utter surprise and amazement a bunch of hits came up. I clicked a few and found tons of real, topless Tricia Helfer pics.

      This may come as a surprise, but a few topless shots != porn ;-)

      --
      The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
    8. Re:Tricia Helfer in Porn? by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      It's more of a personal preference than discrimination.
      I just love asian women and she is quite beautiful :)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    9. Re:Tricia Helfer in Porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe just a guy who doesn't like the barbie type. Definatly not dead, gay or a robot, but that woman does nothing for me.

      I always overhear this from men who would have no chances of attracting a "barbie type" due to being overweight or otherwise unattractive, and it's such an obvious attempt at rationalizing lowering your standards. And almost everyone sees through it, even the fat women you're trying to bang.

  8. says more about the competition by petes_PoV · · Score: 0

    one of the most popular science fiction shows in recent history.

    I gave up on it many years ago - somewhere during season 2, having only watched it sporadically until then. In the end boredom with the plot, lack of engagement with the characters - except the cylons, I really hope they "won". a complete lack credibility with the science and finally the realisation that it didn't really have a story to tell, meant that I found better things to do. That it was popular, even in it's own mind, is a bigger criticism with the other programmes that purport to be SF, than of this rather lame, self-indulgent and overly long show.

    What was it's biggest or possibly only contribution? frak

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:says more about the competition by Luscious868 · · Score: 1

      I agree. I thought the initial made for TV movie was good enough that I'd give the show a chance. I really loved the first few episodes but I gradually lost interest. Stopped watching completely somewhere during season 2.

  9. I like it with one exception by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Moore finished his space opera in a satisfying manner without fucking the whole thing up like Lucas did with his opera.

    He played out a few characters. Killed a couple. And left a few strings untied with starbuck's angelic disappearance.

    LOVED the cracking battle sequence and the physical layout matching the Cobal opera house dream. And didn't see it coming even when they made a lame excuse for needing to move that resurrection fish tank to the CIC for some reason.

    I was worried as it seemed the whole thing was falling apart after "Earth" turned out to be a dud. I was worried that with all the new back-story cropping up, that all we were going to get was a lead-in to the new Caprica series.

    He totally Six Sensed me with the aborted Earth. Didn't see it coming. I'm sure we can go back at see that we weren't shown any continents on the first planet and we had all the clues to know it wasn't earth the first time.

    The thing that made no sense was little Adama's imposing has agrarian dream on 30K other people. We had a gritty reality of 12 colonies of conflicted individuals that lived in a technological world. And pretty boy wants everyone to go back to humping sod because he thinks it will be a better way. And daddy wants to throw a whole fucking fleet of FTL ships into the sun? WTF! Putting all our eggs in one blue-green basket makes us less secure! And not one person disagrees after all the gritty discord we've seen up to now. Made no fucking sense to me.

    1. Re:I like it with one exception by Sancho · · Score: 4, Informative

      We were mislead at the end of Season 3. After Starbuck reappears, we're taken on a tour of the galaxies and shown Earth, implying that this is what Starbuck found:
      http://en.battlestarwiki.org/wiki/File:Earth_(RDM).jpg

      You can clearly make out the United States of America.

      I don't know if we saw continents once Galactica actually made it to Earth. Haven't found a screenshot of that.

    2. Re:I like it with one exception by MeanMF · · Score: 1

      Yeah they did - when the camera shot pans up from the moon to Earth, you can clearly see Africa.

    3. Re:I like it with one exception by Sancho · · Score: 1

      I guess we're talking about three on-screen sequences.

      1) End of season 3.
      2) Season 4, Episode 10 (when they find what they've been calling Earth all series.)
      3) End of Season 4, (when they find what we call Earth.)

      I was interesting in seeing if we'd seen continents on 2.

    4. Re:I like it with one exception by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC, Starbuck reappeared and said "I've been to Earth. I know how to get us there." And then the camera does a crazy zoom halfway across the galaxy and shows us the Earth that we know. Nothing about that is incompatible with her taking BSG there towards the end of the last episode. It's somewhat implied that this is where she takes them in S04E10, but that's a conclusion that isn't necessarily borne out by the show. You came to that conclusion on your own.

    5. Re:I like it with one exception by Sancho · · Score: 1

      If it's implied that she took us there in the middle of season four, but she really didn't, then we were mislead (exactly as I said.)

    6. Re:I like it with one exception by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. Because TV shows and movies (or any form of entertainment) should never mislead us into thinking one thing only to have it turn out to be something else. That's just silly of them to do that. *rollseyes*

    7. Re:I like it with one exception by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can make out the continent of North America, but how are you seeing the political boundaries of the USA in that picture?

    8. Re:I like it with one exception by Manchot · · Score: 1

      All the camera did was pan to Earth after Starbuck said she'd take them there. In the end, that's exactly what she did. (Ok, it's kind of a stretch because she took them to the old Earth first, but whatever.)

    9. Re:I like it with one exception by quantaman · · Score: 1

      We were mislead at the end of Season 3. After Starbuck reappears, we're taken on a tour of the galaxies and shown Earth, implying that this is what Starbuck found:
      http://en.battlestarwiki.org/wiki/File:Earth_(RDM).jpg

      You can clearly make out the United States of America.

      I don't know if we saw continents once Galactica actually made it to Earth. Haven't found a screenshot of that.

      The planets independently evolved genetically compatible humans.

      That the planets also looked the same chances the odds from infinity:1 to infinity:1.

      --
      I stole this Sig
  10. spoiler alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Snape Kills Adama

    1. Re:spoiler alert by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      I can't believe Cavil is Admiral Adama's father!

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:spoiler alert by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      It's a trap!

      Oh wait, wrong admiral.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    3. Re:spoiler alert by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

      With Rosebud.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    4. Re:spoiler alert by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      With Rosebud.

      Which was Harry's father's sled. Oh, and Hermoine's a dude.

    5. Re:spoiler alert by cptnapalm · · Score: 1

      Dude! Spoiler warning!?!?!? Not everybody has read the books y'know.

      sheesh... some people

  11. Unsatisfied by merky1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The finale was a decent episode. But I think that ever since the destruction of the HUB, the show was rudderless.

    I think that this is one of the problems when the central premise of a show is a "mystery." It always ends up that the big reveal is a huge disappointment.

    Also, what happened to all of the basestars that Cavil had under control? Not to mention, the "millions" of cylons on the colonies. Wouldn't they lay out to search for the final five to rebuild resurrection?

    I think the finale needed a 20-30 year jump forward to show aging skinjobs scanning earth, and not detecting technology, continue searching for the final five. It would have given closure to the show's overall theme. Instead we just get a "spiritual" explanation. The reason I feel this way is back when they found the temple of jupiter, Cavil advocated nuking the planet and spending an infinite amount of time searching for earth. Even without resurrection, I think that the remaining cylons would have the same sentiment.

    The other thing that had not been really discussed, and will hopefully come out in the next few entries, is what happened to the artificial intelligence that was the original cylon race? Maybe "the plan" will give us more insight to cylon society.

    --
    --WooooHoooo--
    1. Re:Unsatisfied by Sancho · · Score: 1

      http://www.nj.com/entertainment/tv/index.ssf/2009/03/battlestar_galactica_ronald_d.html gives some insight. In specific, Cavil's skinjobs were supposed to be eradicated.

    2. Re:Unsatisfied by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, what happened to all of the basestars that Cavil had under control? Not to mention, the "millions" of cylons on the colonies. Wouldn't they lay out to search for the final five to rebuild resurrection?

      Well, since the resurrection hub was destroyed, and they can't pro-create amongst themselves, they will slowly die off. Only the Centurions will be able to continue on.

    3. Re:Unsatisfied by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      Cavil advocated nuking the planet and spending an infinite amount of time searching for earth.

      That was Earth 1.0, the one that the final five lived on. Our earth is named in tribute to that one, but it was not the one he was looking for.

      Plus, as RDM explained, all the Cavils were killed either initially in the civil war (Natalie does some "ethnic cleansing" on her basestars) or when the colony was destroyed. Without resurrection, which is now impossible given that Tory was killed, he is gone forever.

    4. Re:Unsatisfied by myrdos2 · · Score: 1

      Because one of the final five is dead, and it supposedly takes all five of them to create the resurrection technology. But they might decide to search for Hera, and hope to uncover the secret to reproduction.

    5. Re:Unsatisfied by merky1 · · Score: 1

      I guess RDM doesn't watch the show, because his explanations only make sense if you forget 80% of the "history." Millions of skinjobs are still on the colonies.

      Even in the finale, the recon reported several basestars resupplying the colony. That is how they determined the best spot for a jump.

      The finale was great due to the acting and the first hour. But as a wrapup for the shows overlying themes, I wanted more.

      --
      --WooooHoooo--
    6. Re:Unsatisfied by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the final five was strangled, remember!? Good luck finding them all.

    7. Re:Unsatisfied by S-100 · · Score: 1

      Bzzt. The Cylons saw the death of one of the final five by strangulation, so it would be pointless for them to search for the remaining four.

    8. Re:Unsatisfied by SpectreBlofeld · · Score: 1

      "Also, what happened to all of the basestars that Cavil had under control? Not to mention, the "millions" of cylons on the colonies. Wouldn't they lay out to search for the final five to rebuild resurrection?"

        Yeah, probably, but it's a big universe, and without resurrection, they'll all die out within a generation - they couldn't breed.

    9. Re:Unsatisfied by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BY YOUR COMMAND

    10. Re:Unsatisfied by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      But that didn't have to happen did it? The writers would have needed another way to end the battle but I rather like the idea.

    11. Re:Unsatisfied by coaxial · · Score: 1

      Also, what happened to all of the basestars that Cavil had under control? Not to mention, the "millions" of cylons on the colonies. Wouldn't they lay out to search for the final five to rebuild resurrection?

      Well they know they know that at least one of them is dead, so searching for the 5 may be pointless. But at least rounding up humans to restart the human experiments would be something.

    12. Re:Unsatisfied by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't they lay out to search for the final five to rebuild resurrection?

      No, in case you didn't notice, one of the final five was killed by the Chief after they realized the bitch killed his wife. All of them shared individual pieces of the tech, without one you're missing a large part of the picture, possibly making the whole thing pointless. Did you actually watch the show?

      Also, they did get a portion of the design, maybe they have enough to build their own already given some time?

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    13. Re:Unsatisfied by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      There would be a problem with the fact that the holding location of that portion of the design was hit with multiple nuclear missiles.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    14. Re:Unsatisfied by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      The Cylon colony was attacked by Galactica. The Raptor piloted by the dead Racetrack fired a bunch of nukes that knocked the colony into the black hole. Galactica FTL'd away in the nick of time.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    15. Re:Unsatisfied by Boronx · · Score: 1

      I think that this is one of the problems when the central premise of a show is a "mystery." It always ends up that the big reveal is a huge disappointment.

      This is only true for shows that go rudderless. I'm a firm believer now that the entire plotline for a series ought to be mapped out from the beginning. See Heroes season 1 for example. "BSG" and "Lost" just try to milk it for a while then wing it at the big reveal. "Lost" was just milking the atmosphere of the show by episode 3, season 1. Japanese pulp adventure cartoons are the worst offenders, but oddly enough, some of the more adult dramas are consistently good at sticking to a tightly woven plot.

    16. Re:Unsatisfied by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the worst SCIFI series ever. I want the time I spent watching it back.

    17. Re:Unsatisfied by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Ok, time to voice my own dissatisfaction with a fairly major plothole...

      We know that the Colonies created Cylons independently - we learn this because the Final Five arrive after the Cylons have rebelled during the original Cylon War, and after the Cylons have begun to experiment with their own hybrid technologies. We can surmise from this that the Colonial Cylons had enough intelligence, free will and sentience to have wants and desires, enough to make them go off on their own.

      We also know that Cavil wants revenge on humanity for the enslavement of his original Cylon ancestors, and that want for revenge is so powerful that he will go to great lengths, including killing his creators, to get it.

      So how is the enslavement of the Hybrids, Raiders and Centurions 'ok'? Sure, Cavil could just be a hypocrite of extreme proportions, but that doesn't explain how the original Colonial Cylons never did anything to prevent this enslavement. Its not as if the new Centurions were simply machines - they had limiters which prevented free will and higher thought, which when removed restored those abilities. They were artificially enslaved by the Final Five and the skinjobs.

    18. Re:Unsatisfied by Homer1946 · · Score: 1

      Bzzt. But there would be a large point to searching for Hera.

  12. Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by Faizdog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Honestly,
    I thought it was weak. If you watched "BSG The Last Frakkin Special" that aired last Monday, there was a key comment in there. Ron Moore said that they were at a loss on how to end the series, and then they walked in and decided that it's about the characters.

    That told me that they didn't know how to end everything, and decided to fumble through it and fill up time with these character things.

    There were so many big stories that needed more elaboration, what was Starbuck, how does the one true god fit in? There was mention that he was a jealous god of the other Lords of Kobol. No mention of them? Starbuck, the one who believed in the polytheistic Lords of Kobol so much that she went back against orders for Athena's Arrow was instead an agent of the monotheistic Cylon God? That's it, head six and baltar, their story just ends so quickly? Things didn't really jive, and that disappointed me. After the whole Tigh and Caprica-6 love each other so much that they had a baby, and Ellen was jealous, that just ended? All of a sudden, we find out Baltar, the womanizer, loved Caprica-6?

    It was not thought out, and by the end, they had no idea what to do. I'm really disapointed in BSG. And this ending makes me appreciate Babylon 5 even more. The value of a well thought out, planned and executed story arc where all the pieces fit together because they've been planned that way is AWESOME.

    For about 4 and a half years, BSG was the best show I'd ever seen. However, ever since they came back with this last batch of 10 episodes, it's been weak. The big issues, the analysis of humanity in dire straits, the realistic depiction of events, I felt that all fell apart. BSG was still a good show, and the ending sentimental and did provide closure. It wasn't bad, but I had so much more high expectations of the ending, for it all to tie in rather than what we got. I mean that's why us SciFi fans are such continuity freaks, we want it all to fit, that's what makes it more real for us.

    --
    -"Those who fought today will die tommorow."-
    1. Re:Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by Narpak · · Score: 1

      I mean that's why us SciFi fans are such continuity freaks, we want it all to fit, that's what makes it more real for us.

      If you were a real SciFi fan you would have said something like "the paradigm needs to be self-contained within it's own continuum." ;)

    2. Re:Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by anagama · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "about the characters"

      I found it rather frustrating sitting through all the backstory stuff, like the drunk driving accident and boy toy one nighter causing Laura to join a campaign -- rather dull and not really that important at this stage of the game.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    3. Re:Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you said. And in all honesty, I don't want to watch anything else Ron Moore has a hand in writing, I'll just be setting myself up for disappointment.

      Ronald D Moore is the American Russell T Davies.

    4. Re:Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by nine-times · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, what I found kind of disappointing was that, even knowing it was coming to an end, they seemed to falter. If the last episode had seemed cobbled together last-minute because they were informed a couple months before that the series was being cancelled, it would have been more understandable. But they knew for years, and basically had a whole extra year to prepare after the writer's strike.

      I enjoyed the plot of the mutiny and some of the other things that happened near the end, but given that those plots didn't go very far, it seems like a bit of a waste when they could have spent that time wrapping things up.

      To me, probably the most disappointing thing was how they wrapped up the opera house dream. What? All those dreams and all that worry about them, and it was just that Caprica and Baltar were supposed to carry Hera 20 feet down a hall? That's retarded. At the very least, I think they should have killed of Helo and Athena and had Baltar and Caprica end up rescuing and then raising Hera. It would have explained them ending up with Hera at the end of the dream, as well as the Head-Caprica telling Baltar that Hera was their daughter.

      In general, I've been impressed with the writing on BSG, but the finale is yet more evidence that writers should have an endgame roughly planned from the beginning. The ending wasn't bad so much as it felt unplanned and inelegant, tacked on and not fitting to the rest of the series. Worse yet, the message of the finale seemed to be that God has a very elegant plan for us all, so having that message come in an inelegant and unplanned form makes for a bad kind of irony.

    5. Re:Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by nine-times · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh, and also, the role that Hera plays that makes her so important is a little bit strange to me. To have her be the genetic Eve of our race kind of puts a strange importance on her. What does it mean-- being half cylon gives her the superpower of having lots of sex with various different men, having diverse offspring, I guess.

      I guess I'm really asking, what does her being half-cylon half-human have to do with anything? Couldn't you make the argument that Athena is the actual genetic Eve? Is Hera actually important?

    6. Re:Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by gobbo · · Score: 1

      If you were a real fan, you would've written "SF"...

    7. Re:Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      Her being half cylon and half human is what brought the two sides together since they both wanted her - in fact, rescuing her is the reason for the final confrontation *and* she helped Kara to find earth2.0. That she becomes mitochondrial eve was just a way of showing that we evolved from them. On the other hand, they did spread out on different continents so maybe that also implies that the other groups died off.

    8. Re:Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by mcelrath · · Score: 1

      The actual mitochondrial eve has a mitochondrial DNA that is different from her mother, by definition. There was a mutation that occured at that point in our genetic history. Another way to introduce this mutation is to inherit it by cross-breeding with another species. Since Athena is NOT human, the mitochondral DNA could have been inherited from her, but that doesn't make her genetic eve. (She's not human)

      And it doesn't mean having lots of sex. Just more than two children, on average, and the others eventually have to be bred out. She's important in the same way as your great-great-grandparents. They had to exist, and they give you your genetics, but that's about all.

      --
      1^2=1; (-1)^2=1; 1^2=(-1)^2; 1=-1; 1=0.
    9. Re:Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by RDW · · Score: 1

      'Couldn't you make the argument that Athena is the actual genetic Eve? Is Hera actually important?'

      Since maternal mitochondrial DNA is passed on unchanged to the children(barring mutations) then Hera's should be identical to Athena's. Actually, since all the Eights presumably have the same mitochondria, if any of the others turned out to be fertile, they'd also have kids with the same mitochondria as Hera...

    10. Re:Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      The value of a well thought out, planned and executed story arc where all the pieces fit together because they've been planned that way is AWESOME.

      I agree. However the B5 (as well as Farscape's) endings were damaged by uncertain (or lacking) funding for the final seasons. As such I'd put them on a roughly even footing. While BSG did not come up with sensible solutions to everything (like dumping all the tech) what blew me away was the revelation of god being the real deal. I had always thought that there would be some scientific type explanation (isolated high tech society etc.). It was an incredibly brave and unique twist (for a scifi show) to add right at the end and, for me at least, it really worked partly because of the religious subtext of the entire show but partly because that's what I loved about BSG. It was so incredibly unique and you never really knew exactly what was going to happen next but whatever it was it usually fit.

    11. Re:Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by Manchot · · Score: 1

      There were so many big stories that needed more elaboration, what was Starbuck, how does the one true god fit in? There was mention that he was a jealous god of the other Lords of Kobol. No mention of them? Starbuck, the one who believed in the polytheistic Lords of Kobol so much that she went back against orders for Athena's Arrow was instead an agent of the monotheistic Cylon God? That's it, head six and baltar, their story just ends so quickly? Things didn't really jive, and that disappointed me. After the whole Tigh and Caprica-6 love each other so much that they had a baby, and Ellen was jealous, that just ended? All of a sudden, we find out Baltar, the womanizer, loved Caprica-6?

      I'm guessing that at least part of the reason they didn't go into detail about the "God" figure is that it will be explored further in Caprica. After all, Ellen did say that the Cylon god was not of their making, and that the Centurions believed in it before they met them. Also (minor Caprica spoilers ahead...stop reading if you absolutely want to be 100% in the clear), from the brief descriptions I've read about Caprica, it will involve a terrorist monotheistic cult whose deity will almost certainly be transferred to the Cylons somehow. I'm willing to bet that we'll see at least one "angel" along the lines of the Caprica-Six and Baltar angels.

    12. Re:Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by canonymous · · Score: 1

      Haven't you heard? Real SciFi fans use SyFy as shorthand! It's all the rage!

    13. Re:Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Oh, and also, the role that Hera plays that makes her so important is a little bit strange to me. To have her be the genetic Eve of our race kind of puts a strange importance on her. What does it mean-- being half cylon gives her the superpower of having lots of sex with various different men, having diverse offspring, I guess.

      I guess I'm really asking, what does her being half-cylon half-human have to do with anything? Couldn't you make the argument that Athena is the actual genetic Eve? Is Hera actually important?

      Seriously! Mitochondrial DNA is 100% maternal, so yes, Boomer/Hera is mitochondrial eve, the whole half-cylon thing was... nothing. It's pointless.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    14. Re:Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I must admit that I fast forwarded through some of the pure soap opera scenes in the prior two episodes.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    15. Re:Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, mitochondrial eve doesn't have to have mitochondrial dna that is different from her mother, she just has to be the earliest common female line ancestor. In the end, if the remains that had been found had been Athena's, she would have been mitochondrial eve. There's lots of reasons that could have been the case without the other colonials all dying off as others have suggested or anything like that. Maybe she just had a lot of female offspring and descendants. Maybe something about being half cylon meant that she had _only_ female descendants for a hundred generations. Maybe cylon's engineered mitochondria are somehow dominant and actually get passed on by her male descendants for a hundred generations until mutation makes it wear off.

    16. Re:Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by Livius · · Score: 1

      I don't think the ending was ideal - I imagine there will be a whole cottage industry of alternate finales springing up - but there is far, far worse out there.

      I'm puzzled, though, that, even if they did have to improvise with the plot continuity, all the supernatural interventions seemed to have such trivial purposes. The Opera house premonitions were an obvious example - neither Athena nor Roslin would have done a single thing differently without the visions. Thrace is killed on Earth 1.0, is reincarnated, learns a tune as a child, is killed in action and then reincarnated again, the Final Five hear the song, Hera is inspired with the same tune, all so she can input one set of FTL jump coordinates. Baltar is taken to the brink of insanity by visions from Virtual Six and starts a whole religious movement so he can make one speech where he states the obvious. Conoy plays mind games with Thrace for years and when he finds her body on Earth 1.0 just says, oh, I was wrong. Plus, God's / gods' plan was apparently to wipe out two civilizations just to bring Hera to Earth 2.0., and we still don't know if Earth 2.0 will repeat the whole cycle of society creates artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence rises in rebellion, artificial intelligence uses bioengineering to remake itself in its creators' image, and starts over with a species so close to the original that they're borderline capable of interbreeding.

      The really big cop-out, in my opinion, was that so much of the plot - probably including the original attempted genocide by the Cylons - was driven by Cavil/John/Number One's mental illness. That never makes for a satisfying story.

      Though I suppose none of this will matter after the new Cylon centurion civilization comes back and nukes Earth 2.0.

      (And we never did learn Six's actual name. She obviously had one - she was undercover on Caprica for two years.)

    17. Re:Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by Livius · · Score: 1

      Mitochondrial Eve really isn't an individual, it's just the population at the point where the gene pool is narrowed. It could mean any female within a few dozen generations of Hera.

    18. Re:Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mutiny was wrapping things up, wrapping up many characters and setting up Anders for his role in the finale. Along with the opera house visions, which were used to set up the path for Hera's safety on galactica instead of big metal centurions stepping on her skull. It may not necessarily be deep, but it was very well-executed considering I don't think the opera house vision was created with a definite plan in mind.

    19. Re:Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by tgd · · Score: 1

      She wasn't "the" mitochondrial eve of humanity -- she was "Mitochondrial Eve" -- a very specific discovery. There's no suggestion that "Mitochondrial Eve" was Eve in the biblical sense. She wasn't a great great great (great ... great) grandmother of everyone -- she just happens to have the oldest set of mitochondrial DNA that is common to all currently living humans. There were likely a huge number of people when she was alive with that same mitochondrial DNA, and it was that population that survived.

      Now with BSG its a little more interesting, since her mitochondrial DNA was Cylon. There's a subtle implication there that the reason we have two completely different sets of DNA today in our cells is because part of it is Cylon DNA. I think people may have missed that subtlety because people may not be widely aware we have two completely separate sets of DNA, but I thought it was a really cool "twist" to the story. (And a twist that couldn't have been told without the flash forward to the present...)

      If anything I think that may have been the entire point of the finale, and perhaps even the series... that race doesn't matter, that politics doesn't matter, that theology doesn't matter.

      While I agree with some posters that the show should've ended with Adama on the hill, I think the bit with Hera *was* the point... probably one that assumed too much knowledge on the part of the viewer.

    20. Re:Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by sonicmerlin · · Score: 1

      The original plot was to have Helo and Athena killed off, but then Moore decided he wanted the "family unit" to survive. There's a lengthy interview with Moore floating around the internet in which he's asked various questions about the ending.

    21. Re:Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

      I found it rather frustrating sitting through all the backstory stuff ... rather dull and not really that important at this stage of the game.

      Ahh... But I imagine it is important for drumming up interest in the new series "Caprica" - which, yawn, I won't be watching...

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    22. Re:Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well... I think that was a bad decision on his part. The "family unit" could have been Baltar, Caprica, and Hera, but I guess that wouldn't have been such a happy ending. I would have been more willing to accept an unhappy ending that made sense and fit with the rest of the show rather what what we got, but I admit that's just my opinion.

    23. Re:Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by Krater76 · · Score: 1

      I agree. However the B5 (as well as Farscape's) endings were damaged by uncertain (or lacking) funding for the final seasons. As such I'd put them on a roughly even footing.

      I can't talk about Farscape as I didn't watch more than a handful of shows, but I just cant accept you considering BSG equal to B5. Go watch B5 again and things that happen in the 5th season are clearly spelled out in the 1st. The arc never deviates, the characters are a part of it but it's all predetermined.

      The problem with shows that pull the 'hints about the future' card is that they have to deliver. If someone doesn't have an idea of the entire arc and forces the writers to stay within that arc then you are just setting yourself up for failure.

      This can be seen in many shows: Lost, Alias, and, yes, BSG.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    24. Re:Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      "about the characters"

      I found it rather frustrating sitting through all the backstory stuff, like the drunk driving accident and boy toy one nighter causing Laura to join a campaign -- rather dull and not really that important at this stage of the game.

      Evangelion was this way. You had this whole show about giant robots, aliens, god or gods, biblical allusions, the apocalypse, all this heavy-duty shit going on along with the personal angst of all the characters and then the final two episodes are a stupid acid trip inside the main character's head. We're told by the creator that the giant robots weren't the point of the show, Shinji's relationship with people is the real issue. Well Jesus Jimmy Fucknozzle, couldn't we have accomplished the same thing with an after-school special and skipped all the robots and shit? Yes, but then nobody would have watched it because Shinji was easily the worst part of the entire show. So when the fans rejected human instrumentality and the studio demanded a remake of the ending, the creator said "Oh, didn't like it? Fuck you, I'm going to make it really vile!" and so we then see every character in the show slaughtered over the course of a double feature. And Shinji still sucks.

      Every story should be "about the characters." The ones that aren't are heavily plot-driven, make use of stock and cliche characters and are the weaker for it. But laying claim to characters at the expense of plot is ridiculous. The plot is what provides the events that shape the characters! It strings all the little events together to make for a coherent story! Galactica = massive self-pwn.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    25. Re:Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      Go watch B5 again and things that happen in the 5th season are clearly spelled out in the 1st.

      True, but the 5th season was a pale imitation of the former seasons. It was still good, and the second time I watched them I appreciated it more. However they clearly rushed season 4 to get to the end of the Earth gov arc due to funding worries and this meant a lot of big drama was missing from season 5. Also they never resolved the psi corps arc which was clearly a casualty of the hurriedly changed plans.

      However, upon reflection, I think what I really liked about BSG's end was the unexpectedness of some of it and that will probably significantly diminish its appeal with time. Whereas B5, even years afterwards, I still think of as an amazing epic. So perhaps you are right...I just need a few months to get there :-)

    26. Re:Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      it was a good backstory. She was a woman who lost "everything" once already, but got up to get involved in society... and ended up being the leader of everybody. They didn't do a good job of showing where the people came from before they blew everything up. (not being like Lost with all those useless flashbacks that change the story every week)

      I liked Adama who was on track (just like our generals) to a nice "consulting" gig with a big company and all the petty politics... decided to ride out the life of his ship as a museum instead. Again, it put him in the right place after not giving up.

    27. Re:Great 4.5 Year Show, Weak Ending by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      it was a clever little blurb to connect the ending to our "reality"... I liked it better than the robots. There is research that suggests Neanderthals weren't killed by modern man, but rather were "breed out" in to the new race distinctly different from the older one. They were trying to connect that bit of history to the story. Hera would have been the oldest person with the new DNA so it would have been "god's will" for her to be eventually found... the whole "happens again" thing.

  13. Harbinger of Death? by hemp · · Score: 1

    Starbuck was called several times the harbinger of death.

    Death of what?

    Also, was she always an Angel? Or did she just become one after she died? Who was her father?

    --
    Skip ------ See the latest from http://www.anArchyFortWorth.com
    1. Re:Harbinger of Death? by jayhawk88 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Harbinger of death to the Cylons. Remember it was always the hybrids that called her that.

    2. Re:Harbinger of Death? by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      Starbuck was called several times the harbinger of death.

      Death of what?

      It's always the Cylons who called her that. The death of the Cylons would be a good guess.

    3. Re:Harbinger of Death? by AtomG · · Score: 1

      Still doesn't make sense, since Galen's actions led to the death of the Cylons, not Kara's. Also, at the very end, there were still plenty of skinjobs.

      I figure that "harbinger of death" had to do with Kara leading both races to their end: Hera was mitochondrial Eve, and so only her ancestors survived and reproduced and evolved into modern sapiens.

      Of course, I would interpret that as Kara having saved both races entirely, which means that the hybrids were just being melodramatic.

    4. Re:Harbinger of Death? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I thought it was said at some point that she would lead humanity to their death. But either way, she didn't really kill off the Cylons either.

    5. Re:Harbinger of Death? by jcr · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also, at the very end, there were still plenty of skinjobs.

      I've decided that "skinjob" is going to be my new non-PC term for an unusually attractive woman. EG: "Wow, check out that skinjob!"

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    6. Re:Harbinger of Death? by DragonPup · · Score: 3, Insightful

      'Death' doesn't always mean the end of life, but sometimes it means a new beginning. The hybrids never spoke literally to begin with.

      --
      "Useless organic meatbag" -HK-47
    7. Re:Harbinger of Death? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've decided that "skinjob" is going to be my new non-PC term for an unusually attractive woman. EG: "Wow, check out that skinjob!"

      Welcome to 1982.

    8. Re:Harbinger of Death? by anagama · · Score: 1

      It was your comment that made me finally understand. Starbuck did lead them to their death. Their stupid decision to throw away all tech meant destruction by starvation and the common cold, except for Hera who had a better immune system. Hera survived long enough to reproduce and became Genetic Eve.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    9. Re:Harbinger of Death? by jayhawk88 · · Score: 1

      Well "harbinger" doesn't necessarily mean "actions", it can just mean a "sign", but even so, it was through Kara that the fleet found Earth, which is what really was the beginning of the end.

    10. Re:Harbinger of Death? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Harbinger of death to the Cylons. Remember it was always the hybrids that called her that.

      Hybrid: Kara Thrace will lead the human race to its end.
      Shaw: What?
      Hybrid: She is the herald of the apocalypse. The harbinger of death. They must not follow her.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    11. Re:Harbinger of Death? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      'Death' doesn't always mean the end of life, but sometimes it means a new beginning. The hybrids never spoke literally to begin with.

      It LITERALLY means the end of life. And the hybrids were nice enough to point that out:

      Hybrid: Kara Thrace will lead the human race to its end.
      Shaw: What?
      Hybrid: She is the herald of the apocalypse. The harbinger of death. They must not follow her.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    12. Re:Harbinger of Death? by GloBug · · Score: 1

      Harbinger only means a "sign"; a sign of things to come. Maybe it was her own death that she was harbinger of. She did willingly let herself explode. And saying that she would bring the human race to it's end, could just as easily mean the end of their journey to find Earth. I think given the fact that she had a "destiny" throught out this whole series meant she could have possibly been an angel all along. Or maybe because she had a "destiny" she was brought back to life only in order to fulfill it.

    13. Re:Harbinger of Death? by alexo · · Score: 1

      > Starbuck was called several times the harbinger of death.
      > Death of what?

      [disclaimer: hated the finale]

      The original statement was: "You are the harbinger of death, Kara Thrace. You will lead them all to their end".
      Given that the hybrids' presentation was somewhat confused, here's one possible interpretation:
      You are the harbinger of death [of the Cylons in the colony]
      You will lead them [=humans] all to their end [of journey]

    14. Re:Harbinger of Death? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      I was getting the feeling she was an "Angel" too, but it would have been a mass-effect, unlike the localized ones for Capirica and Baltar.

      In the interview link, Moore mentions not thinking too much about the father thing, that it wasn't really decided by the writers.

      If you wanted to get REALLY picky, it appeared her father was Daniel (or maybe another ghost) who taught her the song. Perhaps one Daniel escaped to the colonies after Cavil had them all killed off and the DNA was destroyed so he couldn't be regenerated without reuniting all the "brainwashed" 5. So in fact she was the first hybrid, which would explain her attitude and skills, and the song in her head.

      As a side note, the head scientist in Caprica is ALSO a Daniel! It doesn't look like the same character but maybe he donated some knowledge to the cylon cause along the way!

  14. Two changes that could've been made by StandardCell · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. Less talk and more subtlety. This means very little or no explicit dialog, no in-your-face pictures of dancing robots (but maybe Baltar and Six in front of an electronics store), and Jimi Hendrix's version of All Along The Watchtower playing on some radio in the background of some guy on the street. As it stands, it was too overt and tried too hard to make its point for viewers already accustomed to needing to think a bit more.

    2. What probably would've happened after Lee recommended all technology go away is a split between those who still wanted it and those who didn't. The two sides would create a pact to keep separate from each other, the small minority of technology-loving people going to live on a small continent off the west coast of Africa... Said continent, of course, to have been destroyed at some future point in time by natural disaster and essentially all technology along with it. This would solve what would be an obvious dilemma and split in viewpoints of the remaining people while reasonably explaining what would've happened to their technology.

    1. Re:Two changes that could've been made by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Also, it should have been 10,000-20,000 years ago rather than 150,000 years ago. Even without using advanced technology, they would still have built a reasonably advanced civilization within a generation or two (think Egypt).

      The idea of them building an advanced civilization on an Atlantic continent is pretty good, but they should have been destroyed by cylons, or a war, rather than a natural disaster. The dregs of that civilization might integrate themselves into the other developing civilizations of the world, causing the flowering of advanced civilizations around the world about 6000 years ago.

    2. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was 150k years ago to explain Hera being the mitochondrial eve and essentially all of us being descendants of humans and cylons.

    3. Re:Two changes that could've been made by JackieBrown · · Score: 3, Insightful

      1. Less talk and more subtlety. This means very little or no explicit dialog, no in-your-face pictures of dancing robots

      The extreme spoon feeding of the plot was annoying and insulting. It was also beneath the show.

      When Starbuck was dialing the jump address, we really did not need all the flashes. I would have been fine with one flash to remind some where the music notes came from, but not a minutes worth.

      Also, the Boomer flashback was even more unnecessary.

    4. Re:Two changes that could've been made by lordofthechia · · Score: 3, Informative

      . What probably would've happened after Lee recommended all technology go away is a split between those who still wanted it and those who didn't.

      I know, that was the moment I could no longer suspend disbelief. The writers worked so hard to make the 40-50 thousand refugees believable (with conflicts, indecision, even mutiny and greed). But on what would have been the most shocking decision to date they all suddenly agreed?

      I agree with you on the split, but the dissenters could have lived on an island, away from the rest, along with all their culture and tech. Wasn't there a battlestar called Atlantia? So they could have explained the dissenters as one of the lost civilizations of myth by having them don the name of one of the lost battlestars of the fleet.

      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    5. Re:Two changes that could've been made by nine-times · · Score: 1

      The two sides would create a pact to keep separate from each other, the small minority of technology-loving people going to live on a small continent off the west coast of Africa... Said continent, of course, to have been destroyed at some future point in time by natural disaster and essentially all technology along with it.

      That's a great idea, although it'd be better if they were destroyed by another civil war-- or something that ties into the whole "this has happened before, and will happen again" idea.

    6. Re:Two changes that could've been made by aeryn_sunn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I hated the ending. The unilateral decision to get rid of all technology for everybody was both absurd, short-sighted, and just plain stupid. Why not give people a choice at least? And why the hell would the humans decide to live like cavemen on a strange planet without at least medical technology? There are probably viruses, bacteria, and parasites that would wipe out the colonials. So are we to believe that simple non-life threatening infections now all of a sudden become deadly because of the basic lack of antibiotics?

      And what about food? With farming and all what happens during a drought? Hell, what about simple things like books to read, pencils and pens to write with? The whole premise that the colonials all, all off a sudden decide to become essentially Amish after living with technology all their lives is just catastrophically asinine. Fuck, why not at least not destroy the ships in orbit, leave one Raptor on Earth so that the different settlements can be checked in on from time-to-time. Hell, what happened to the sense of wonder and awe of the colonials in that why wouldn't they at least search for other inhabitable planets just in case Earth like gets hit by a comet or asteroid or some other natural disaster befalls Earth and the Colonials need to get the hell outta there.

      Ug, what an unbelievably crappy ass implausible ending to an otherwise awesome series... Am I the only one that feels like this???

    7. Re:Two changes that could've been made by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

      That last part with the dancing robots and such, I half expected to see a "To be continued..." with the Terminator trailer directly following....

      I thought the first 90 minutes of the episode was fantastic. Even the Baltar speech was good. His character went full circle. But the last 40 minutes. There were a lot of just endings.

      It was an ending, but it honestly felt half empty.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    8. Re:Two changes that could've been made by lordofthechia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are probably viruses, bacteria, and parasites that would wipe out the colonials.

      Totally agree, moving beyond the silliness of the colonials abandoning the technology that kept them alive for all those years... This was a perfect opportunity for the writers to let us know this is why settling on earth without Hera would have ended in disaster. It's like they forgot the episode where her blood cured cancer? It could have been subtle too:

      Whoever:"Will we adapt to this planets diseases?"
      (Pan to Hera on the field)
      The Doctor:"I think we'll be allright"

      Ok, I suck at writing, but you get my drift.

      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    9. Re:Two changes that could've been made by anagama · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree with you though I might have been able to accept them going to "Amish-Tech" -- Even metal plows, wood cutting tools, leather tanning, etc. etc. were all high tech of a certain age or other. But to drop down to sticks and stones is just ridiculous. After working so hard to survive for years, they're now going to ensure that at least 95% of the survivors die in the next two years from simple things, like lack of food, or lack of gear to analyze berries and roots aside from the "what happens when I eat this" test. They should have just pulled a Cavil -- at least they'd have avoided the suffering.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    10. Re:Two changes that could've been made by S-100 · · Score: 1

      I found the decision to leave technology behind a daring and fitting end. They were already being decimated in their dealings with the Cylons, so even without technology they would have a better chance of survival in the place of their choosing on Earth.

      As for leaving "some" technology in reserve behind for whatever purpose would have un-done the entire justification for abandoning the technology to begin with. It would have allowed some group from a future generation to destroy or enslave everyone else.

      As for flying all the ships into the Sun, I would have put them in orbit around one of the outer planets, where they would not be discovered until humanity (re)gained significant spaceflight capabilities.

    11. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't like it at first, but the more I thought of it the more I realized it was plausible. This is a group of people who had there entire civilization exterminated by technology they created, after having another near miss within many of there lifetimes. Then they were hunted for 4/5 years by the machines they created. I can see them going "you know what, **** it, a toasters not worth it."

    12. Re:Two changes that could've been made by anagama · · Score: 1

      I don't understand how having less technology would make them safer from the cylons. It seems that the cylons were hard enough to kill with guns (though easier at the end of the series than the begining) -- what is a rock and a stick going to do if some remnants of cylon culture found them and came back?

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    13. Re:Two changes that could've been made by edcheevy · · Score: 1

      I agree it was silly -- at least a few thousand people would have resisted and wanted to stick with technology! On the other hand, if you've ever unplugged from the cloud for a significant length of time you'll notice that technology really isn't that important to our lives, we just think it is because we're immersed in it.

    14. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Dredd13 · · Score: 1

      The two sides would create a pact to keep separate from each other, the small minority of technology-loving people going to live on a small continent off the west coast of Africa... Said continent, of course, to have been destroyed at some future point in time by natural disaster and essentially all technology along with it. This would solve what would be an obvious dilemma and split in viewpoints of the remaining people while reasonably explaining what would've happened to their technology.

      ... and would explain a long-standing "Atlantis" myth.

    15. Re:Two changes that could've been made by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      The unilateral decision to get rid of all technology for everybody was both absurd, short-sighted, and just plain stupid.

      While this annoyed me too, I took it as a nod to the original series:

      There are those who believe that life here began out there, far across the universe, with tribes of humans who may have been the forefathers of the Egyptians, or the Toltecs, or the Mayans. That they may have been the architects of the great pyramids, or the lost civilizations of Lemuria or Atlantis.

      If we assume that we're their descendents, then we need an explanation as to why there wasn't any technology back then... So we need to remaining humans to throw it away. But I agree - That wouldn't have actually happened.

    16. Re:Two changes that could've been made by garett_spencley · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree completely. While the whole "man vs. technology" message was kind of obviously implied throughout the whole show, I was able to overlook that message and enjoy a show that was about humanity's struggle for survival. The show was amazing in that regard.

      Yet in one foul sweep, the ending actually managed to sour the entire series for me :(

      Exaggerated ? I tried to convince myself that it is, and that I should relax and realize that the message was implied throughout. But the more I think about it the more I realize that for me the show was about humanity's struggle for survival. It didn't matter that it was survival against technology gone sour. It could just as well have been against aliens or a severe natural disaster, or even a human hegemony that was bent on ethnic cleansing. Whatever. At the end when Lee decides to arrogantly and shortsightedly take it upon himself to condemn the vast majority of the fleet to certain death, it was an insult to the extremely costly struggle that people were involuntarily forced to endure over the past several years.

      It strikes me as misguided when people fail to realize that ingenuity and the division of labour is what has allowed humanity to survive against extreme obstacles provided by nature. Darwin's "survival of the fittest" did not mean survival of the most physically fit. It meant survival for those species best able to adapt to the conditions imposed by nature. That's exactly what humans have done by forming social groups and developing technology that has improved our chances for survival and our standards of living. Every single human alive today has that evolutionary process to thank for being alive.

      I love nature just as much as anyone, and I hate pollution. I go for walks in parks and I'm an camper and a very "outdoors-man" type of person ... but I'm not naive enough to fail to realize that I and my ancestors would not be alive today without ingenuity and the division of labour. Shoving a short-sighted environmentalist message down everyone's throat at the end of the show caused me to look at the whole show from a different perspective and has soured all of the time that I really enjoyed watching how humanity worked out it's issues and conflicts at the brink of extinction.

    17. Re:Two changes that could've been made by tyrione · · Score: 1

      I hated the ending. The unilateral decision to get rid of all technology for everybody was both absurd, short-sighted, and just plain stupid. Why not give people a choice at least? And why the hell would the humans decide to live like cavemen on a strange planet without at least medical technology? There are probably viruses, bacteria, and parasites that would wipe out the colonials. So are we to believe that simple non-life threatening infections now all of a sudden become deadly because of the basic lack of antibiotics?

      And what about food? With farming and all what happens during a drought? Hell, what about simple things like books to read, pencils and pens to write with? The whole premise that the colonials all, all off a sudden decide to become essentially Amish after living with technology all their lives is just catastrophically asinine. Fuck, why not at least not destroy the ships in orbit, leave one Raptor on Earth so that the different settlements can be checked in on from time-to-time. Hell, what happened to the sense of wonder and awe of the colonials in that why wouldn't they at least search for other inhabitable planets just in case Earth like gets hit by a comet or asteroid or some other natural disaster befalls Earth and the Colonials need to get the hell outta there.

      Ug, what an unbelievably crappy ass implausible ending to an otherwise awesome series... Am I the only one that feels like this???

      Agreed. They spent so much time trying to build a democracy and restore the notions of civilized discourse [often turning to drunken stupor where boundless amounts of booze materialized], but then when you come to a planet 150.000 removed from our present day, did the authors pause to think how likely they would be received--besides being treated as food with Cannibalism running amuck?

      Sorry, it was beyond the pale pre-school in depth.

    18. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Arterion · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I totally agree. I actually felt like the ending ruined the entire series.

      The BS that "it's about the characters" even falls apart under any sort of scrutiny, because I feel like it's very out of character for a number of main players and a good portion of the 38k survivors to decide to throw all their technology into the sun.

      A lot of plot holes were left. We can only assume that the destruction of the colony didn't mean the destruction of every single cylon. They made it clear there were basestars jumping in and out -- those basestars are still out there somewhere, probably searching for the humans to wipe them out, because they are crazy Cavil's aboard.

      And what about all the quirks about living on a new planet? What about the water? Unknown diseases? Something weird about the food sources. I would guess a good 50% of the colonists that settled wouldn't survive the first couple years because of mundane things. I mean, if Hera is so important, why throw the only sick bay capable of providing her with pediatric care into the sun? It's retarded.

      And to me, the absolute worst part is at the very end: We see the 150k-years-late cylon/human hybrids on our earth making proto-cylons. THE WHOLE CYCLE WILL REPEAT AGAIN!

      Does it even MATTER that the inhabitants of earth are "half cylon" like Hera? It won't matter one damn bit when they start making toasters.

      I guess the point is, we had SO MUCH effort on the part of the characters to save their civilization, and then at the very last episode, after they'd FINALLY WON they decide to just throw it all into the sun.

      The last episode turned the entire series into a single political statement about not creating subservient AI. That's it. That's all BSG was about.

      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
    19. Re:Two changes that could've been made by garett_spencley · · Score: 1

      "if you've ever unplugged from the cloud for a significant length of time you'll notice that technology really isn't that important to our lives, we just think it is because we're immersed in it."

      A lot of what we use on a day to day basis isn't "necessary", but you can argue that those "creature comforts" (as one of the characters put it) have made us better equipped to spend our resources developing technology that has a more profound impact on our survival.

      All technology has been developed to improve our conditions. We are "programmed" to do that. That's how humanity evolved, by forming social groups, dividing labour amongst us and developing goods and techniques of producing goods that make our day-to-day lives easier. Increasing our chances for survival.

      The argument that we "long ago reached a point where we started developing only creature comforts that are not necessary for humanity's survival" was being made hundreds of years ago. Karl Marx implied that in the Communist Manifesto in 1848. Yet when we think of the medical conditions that we have cured since then (birth complications including fistulas, diseases like small pox, polio and so forth, famines caused by droughts as recent as the 1900's) you couldn't possibly want to condemn people to that kind of suffering. Yet if the researches who develop techniques for those things still had to plough their farms, hunt their own game, spin their own cotton etc. the chances of developing those technologies would be extremely diminished. The more creature comforts we have the more "important" stuff we also cure.

    20. Re:Two changes that could've been made by ucblockhead · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except that they did not, in fact, get rid of all technology. They got rid of space ships. They kept "supplies", which presumably included things like antibiotics, books, pens, etc. What antibiotics they had. Bear in mind that the fleet likely had no way to manufacture antibiotics. That's what a lot of people here seem to miss...without the technological infrastructure to create supplies, those supplies will inevitably not last.

      Hell, the most valuable bit of technology in their situation is not an unmaintainable spaceship that can no longer jump and is barely spaceworthy. The most valuable bit of technology would be a book on wilderness survival. Presumably they didn't launch those into the sun.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    21. Re:Two changes that could've been made by khallow · · Score: 1

      Technology is only necessary to keep our population maybe 20 times larger than it'd otherwise be. And not having to do every little thing like make clothes, find food, or make shelter.

    22. Re:Two changes that could've been made by anagama · · Score: 1

      They kept supplies they could carry on their backs. Good luck come winter. Good luck when the energy bars run out.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    23. Re:Two changes that could've been made by mcelrath · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Did you somehow get the idea that somewhere in the fleet they had a pencil, book, or antibiotic manufacturing facility?

      I think they hit the end of their rope. They have no resources, no fuel, no food. They have no choice but to abandon their ships and live on the surface. On top of that, they're all emotionally devastated.

      That's what I got out of the ending. That most characters were so emotionally devastated by the last four years that they wanted to crawl in a hole and die. If I could go live in a quiet cabin in the mountains after that, I probably would.

      --
      1^2=1; (-1)^2=1; 1^2=(-1)^2; 1=-1; 1=0.
    24. Re:Two changes that could've been made by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Worse even; why would all the alcoholics aboard Galactica choose to live in a society still thousands of years away from discovering alcohol?

      Seriously though, in a series where spaceships jump around space battling robots, I can pretty much buy into any plot twist the series throws at me, but the unanimous decission to live without technology is just too absurd to swallow. Wouldn't it have been a much plot twist to just make them genetically incompatible with the earth population, let the race die of peacefully. You could even "transfer" the deity to the earth humans if you need to keep the "happened before, will happen again" theme. Heck, crossbreeding the galactica crew with neanderthal humans would probably have resulted in humans too unintelligent to use the galactica tech; add a few generations and the technology is gone from society; you could leave the rest of the storyline intact but explain the loss of technology.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    25. Re:Two changes that could've been made by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      Yeah, hope they didn't starve during the long African winter...

      --
      The cake is a pie
    26. Re:Two changes that could've been made by PyroMosh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree 100% that spoon feeding is beneath the show and insulting. Like when they showed Earth at the end of Season 3, when Starbuck returns.

      But I didn't see this as that kind of spoon feeding. I *did* think that the fast forward scene was sloppy though. The robots didn't really move anything forward, and being mostly cutesy, were badly out of place at the end of this show.

      Starbuck's jump coordinates flashbacks could have been trimmed down a bit, and I don't think we'd have missed much.

      But Boomer's flashback was important. Not for it's content, but for it's context. Boomer has been painted alternatingly (as many characters have) as the villain, and a victim of her circumstances / someone who made some bad choices. In the lead-up to her returning Hera to the Colonials, they paint her almost entirely as a villain. A redeemed villain with her last actions, but a villain none the less. You're probably thinking mostly of her sins - shooting Adama, kidnapping Hera, etc.

      Her real feelings for the Chief, her horror at waking up soaking wet in the arms locker before the water tank explodes, those feelings are so long ago, and so far forgotten in the evolution of the character, that the flashback brings you down immediately from the "bitch deserved it" reaction of Athena finally getting her revenge.

    27. Re:Two changes that could've been made by cskrat · · Score: 1

      I'd have modded you up if I hadn't already posted a comment on this page.

      I agree. The human race went from tens of billions to tens of thousands overnight. That's trauma on a scale beyond what we can naturally process. That's 99.9998% of all human life gone in the time it takes to get a movie from Netflix. That's the entire US population fitting into a high school gym with room to set up cots. They were ready to send every last bit of technology into the nearest star.

      --
      My God! It's full of eval()'s.
    28. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what about food? With farming and all what happens during a drought? Hell, what about simple things like books to read, pencils and pens to write with?

      AND WHAT ABOUT PENCILS!?!? I DIDNT SEE ONE! THE COLONIALS CANT FIGURE OUT HOW TO WRITE.

    29. Re:Two changes that could've been made by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      You were hoping for a 12-hour season finale?

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    30. Re:Two changes that could've been made by anagama · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you missed the part where the Chief found a cold northern island. Or the part where they would spread out around the globe.

      For those who will stay in Africa: Good luck when the bottled water, purification tabs run out.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    31. Re:Two changes that could've been made by raju1kabir · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hated the ending. The unilateral decision to get rid of all technology for everybody was both absurd, short-sighted, and just plain stupid.

      Not so. By starting over, humanity shed the cultural baggage that for so many cycles had them pointlessly cutting the corners off all their sheets of paper. It was the Final Perfection: In our current Cycle, we at last use rectangular paper, just as the Gods intended. Once we get our dancing robots working to their satisfaction, we will Ascend into the heavens and sitteth at the right hand of our Creators where we will join them in meddling capriciously in the petty affairs of less enlightened species for all eternity.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    32. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      The unilateral decision to get rid of all technology for everybody was both absurd, short-sighted, and just plain stupid.

      I agree. A better way to have solved it would have been to have the final jump point end up inside Earth's atmosphere with only minutes for the fleet to abandon ship and scatter over the surface of the planet with a few limited supplies...either that or some other emergency to force rapid abandonment and destruction of the major bits of tech.

    33. Re:Two changes that could've been made by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      For those who will stay in Africa: Good luck when the bottled water, purification tabs run out.

      You do realize that in reality, our ancestors, totting spears as their most sophisticated technology, still managed to survive in Africa.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    34. Re:Two changes that could've been made by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Heck, crossbreeding the galactica crew with neanderthal humans would probably have resulted in humans too unintelligent to use the galactica tech; add a few generations and the technology is gone from society; you could leave the rest of the storyline intact but explain the loss of technology.

      The humans that they showed in the show were clearly not Neanderthals. They were too tall, too lean, and in the wrong spot (Africa vs Europe). That aside, most research indicates that Neanderthals weren't likely to be any less intelligent than modern humans. If they could mate with the members of the RTF, the offspring would be intellectually fine.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    35. Re:Two changes that could've been made by anagama · · Score: 1

      Yeah. But why would one willingly choose a short, dirty, uncomfortable existence in which you play immune system roulette?

      The whole chuck everything makes no sense unless god intervened to eliminate rational though in the colonists so they could finally and forever be finished off. The whole god+irrational behavior fits together perfectly. It is clear that they all died out without reproducing if Hera is considered M. Eve.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    36. Re:Two changes that could've been made by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      The inhabitants of the original, nuked-out earth were Pure Cylon, and yet the cycle repeated for them. If you don't put so much stock in labels, you see the cycle as: Society A creates artificial life B, and treats them as slaves. Society B rises up, and overthrows Society A, leading to death & destruction.

    37. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The unilateral decision to get rid of all technology for everybody"
      They didn't. Not really. They brought all kinds of provisions and tools down to the surface and evenly divided them among the settlements. They dumped the ships and the computers and the weapons, but they certainly didn't burn everything.

      "And why the hell would the humans decide to live like cavemen on a strange planet without at least medical technology?"
      After four or five years, they'd likely be pretty much out of medical supplies in the first place. Basic medicines, disinfectants, and tools are probably among the provisions allotted to each settlement.

      "And what about food?"
      They specifically mentioned cultivation sites after abandoning "technology", so clearly at least basic farming techniques and implements are going to survive.

      "Hell, what about simple things like books to read, pencils and pens to write with?"
      Not "technology".

      "Hell, what happened to the sense of wonder and awe of the colonials"
      They've probably had their fill of searching and running around in space after being chased for years by a force trying to kill them all. They're done with it. They want to be firmly planted on the ground--this much is obvious when they settled on New Caprica. They don't want to keep going if they don't have to, and you can't blame them for that.

      It's an "unbelievably crappy ass implausible ending" because you want it to be, so you read into the most convenient meaning so you can bitch about it. There isn't an ending that would have satisfied your type--you need not to like it to cope.

    38. Re:Two changes that could've been made by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      I know, that was the moment I could no longer suspend disbelief. The writers worked so hard to make the 40-50 thousand refugees believable (with conflicts, indecision, even mutiny and greed). But on what would have been the most shocking decision to date they all suddenly agreed?

      Yeah, and you could tell that the writers agree with you, because of the throw-away line by lawyer-dude whose name I can't remember expressing disbelief that they'd all go along with it.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    39. Re:Two changes that could've been made by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      You misunderstand what Mitochondrial Eve is. Plenty of others may have had offspring, as long as those offspring didn't have girls that continued a matriarchal line to present day.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    40. Re:Two changes that could've been made by chromatic · · Score: 1

      [Our] ancestors, totting spears as their most sophisticated technology, still managed to survive in Africa.

      They did so in part because they grew up there, with immune systems acclimated to local conditions. (One idly wonders about the Colonial version of smallpox -- or hopes no Colonial ever happened to sneeze in the direction of a native.)

    41. Re:Two changes that could've been made by ucblockhead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are presuming that their spaceships could magically create everything they needed to survive. The show was making it very clear that their ships were falling apart, they were very short on supplies, and were having difficulties keeping the basics going.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    42. Re:Two changes that could've been made by trytoguess · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Deciding to abandon technology guaranteed their decedents would forget any hard learned lessons the survivors gained. How can you teach a Earth 2.0 born child about the dangers of mistreating AIs (or other sentience in general) and other modern day ethics when he/she couldn't begin to comprehend such a concept, and is spending most of his time learning how to gather enough food and water anyways. Like the last scene stated, we're doing it all over again. Abandoning technology didn't save us; it just delayed what might not have been inevitable.

      I would say though destroying the colonial fleet did make sense assuming one believed Lee was right. If tech moves too quickly for our good, then it would do no good for future (present?) day humans to gain access to the advanced remnants of Galactica and co.

    43. Re:Two changes that could've been made by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      They didn't just give up the equivilant of iPods, and DS Lites. They also lost vital things like medicine, food perservation/analysis. I still think going completly luddite was foolish.

    44. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes an obvious Atlantis side story.

    45. Re:Two changes that could've been made by servognome · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah. But why would one willingly choose a short, dirty, uncomfortable existence in which you play immune system roulette?

      Because the alternative was a short, dirty, uncomfortable, powerless existence inside a tin can where you play jump roulette.
      The common civilian spent their lives huddled on cots, and served as slaves to the technology that kept them alive. There would be a great sense of freedom to make your own life apart from the caste of fixing computers, processing fuel, and eating algae all day.

      It is clear that they all died out without reproducing if Hera is considered M. Eve.

      No, Hera is just the only one with a direct maternal linage. Other human/human-cylon bloodlines could exist

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    46. Re:Two changes that could've been made by SeeManRun · · Score: 1

      I agree with you though I might have been able to accept them going to "Amish-Tech" -- Even metal plows, wood cutting tools, leather tanning, etc. etc. were all high tech of a certain age or other. But to drop down to sticks and stones is just ridiculous. After working so hard to survive for years, they're now going to ensure that at least 95% of the survivors die in the next two years from simple things, like lack of food, or lack of gear to analyze berries and roots aside from the "what happens when I eat this" test. They should have just pulled a Cavil -- at least they'd have avoided the suffering.

      It isn't like their brains went back to stone age. They of course possess all the knowledge of the civilization they are leaving behind. They know how to farm, know how to make weapons, know how to make medicine and drugs, and even understand the theory of computers and could eventually build them if they chose. So they are leaving nothing behind but possessions, not the knowledge that made those possessions.

    47. Re:Two changes that could've been made by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      We know the they had refineries, and had some short of ability to process biomatter into edible... pieces. It wouldn't shock me if they could manufacture some medication, after all these years they would've run out of drugs otherwise imo. Still, I certainly wouldn't turn my nose on metal processing, and a way to turn grass into food if necessary. Even w/o all that the ships could've still been used as temporary shelter.

    48. Re:Two changes that could've been made by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      I agree entirely. Also, I was not pleased with the "Oh it's all God!" explanation. I was hoping all those mysteries would have a sci-fi explanation, not a theological one, despite all the references to god and gods throughout the show. Should've seen it coming with how they handled the single atheist on the show (Gaius) and how all the scientific, logical cylons happen to be the evil ones.

    49. Re:Two changes that could've been made by deadboy2000 · · Score: 1

      Telling a story is more than just making the audience understand the plot; it's about making the audience feel something. Sure, the Starbuck jump coordinate scene could have conveyed the same amount of information more efficiently, but that wouldn't have had the same dramatic impact.

    50. Re:Two changes that could've been made by anagama · · Score: 1

      Building a shovel is easier with:

      A) rocks and sticks.

      B) scrap metal and sticks.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    51. Re:Two changes that could've been made by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      I agree. The human race went from tens of billions to tens of thousands overnight. That's trauma on a scale beyond what we can naturally process. That's 99.9998% of all human life gone in the time it takes to get a movie from Netflix. That's the entire US population fitting into a high school gym with room to set up cots. They were ready to send every last bit of technology into the nearest star

      I disagree. It's much more traumatic to lose one person you know than a million you don't. That's why the holocaust happened - people don't (unfortunately) empathize with unknown, faceless strangers.

      Think of it - how many people die every day in car accidents, and they don't get as much mention as one actress on a ski slope - because, for many people, she's not faceless. How many people die of lung cancer or smoking-induced hear disease? And yet we still don't ban cigarettes. It's only when it's someone near and dear to us, or that we can put a face and a voice to, that it really kicks in.

      The ending is totally unrealistic.

    52. Re:Two changes that could've been made by anagama · · Score: 1

      You make the mistake of thinking that "technology" means computers etc. Technology also includes shovels, food storage receptacles, cloth, etc. etc. They've gone and chucked everything.

      And the pieces of the ships would have immense value while figuring out how to survive. They could act as shelter while they learn how to build things from wood and grass.

      The "throw it all in the sun" bit was suicide, not a wise or reasoned choice.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    53. Re:Two changes that could've been made by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      AND WHAT ABOUT PENCILS!?!? I DIDNT SEE ONE! THE COLONIALS CANT FIGURE OUT HOW TO WRITE.

      That's because the Galactica is supposed to be the Freedom-loving USA. It's only the Soviets who used pencils in space.

      I for one welcome our cylon- ... aw, frak it, the ending just totally ruined the whole thing ...

    54. Re:Two changes that could've been made by anagama · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So they are leaving nothing behind but possessions, not the knowledge that made those possessions.

      Take the smartest most adept computer engineer in the world, put him/her out in the woods with a set of clothes, a tent, and a pocket knife. Call me when he returns with a functioning computer.

      Take the smartest most adept metalurgical expert, put him/her out in the woods with a set of clothes, a tent, a pocket knife, and one friend. Call me when they manage to find enough ore, which they can dig out in sufficient quantity with sticks, to blast into metal which they can then work into a simple thing like a spoon.

      This could go on and on. The fact is, they needed the remnants to get a start on what they'd need to learn to survive. Throwing it away means most won't survive. In essence, it was a stupid and suicidal ending. It's no different than if they found earth and then decided to commit suicide by staying on the ships and flying into the sun. Either ending is just ridiculous contempt for the viewers. At least most viewers.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    55. Re:Two changes that could've been made by coaxial · · Score: 1

      I hated the ending. The unilateral decision to get rid of all technology for everybody was both absurd, short-sighted, and just plain stupid. Why not give people a choice at least?

      They did have a choice. They put it to a vote. The lawyer now president remarks, "I wouldn't have thought they would have gone for it." To which Adama replies, "Never underestimate the appeal of a clean slate."

      That said, it's still dumb.

    56. Re:Two changes that could've been made by JonathanBoyd · · Score: 1

      Should've seen it coming with how they handled the single atheist on the show (Gaius) and how all the scientific, logical cylons happen to be the evil ones.

      Didn't Gaius waver back and forth and weren't the Cylons quite religious - monotheistic in fact?

    57. Re:Two changes that could've been made by servognome · · Score: 1

      You make the mistake of thinking that "technology" means computers etc. Technology also includes shovels, food storage receptacles, cloth, etc. etc. They've gone and chucked everything.

      I'm not convinced they chucked absolutely everything; they got rid of the "ships, equipment, etc." but did keep things like language, farming and hunting techniques (Baltar, Helo), organization - all the "best" parts of colonial. Likely the colonists would have had basic provisions like shovels to live a simple agrarian existence.

      This is one of the reasons it would have made more sense for them to land 10,000 years ago. It would have fit better in terms of the neolithic revolution and emergence of civilization around the world - and played a nice homage to the original series which mentions the Egyptians, Mayans, pyramid building, etc. Even Atlantis could have been a sect that didn't completely give up technology.

      And the pieces of the ships would have immense value while figuring out how to survive. They could act as shelter while they learn how to build things from wood and grass.
      The "throw it all in the sun" bit was suicide, not a wise or reasoned choice.

      While reasonable they could use the ships as shelters, they would always serve as symbols and temptation to return to the old ways. Sending the ships into the sun meant there was no way back (ala Cortes). Symbolism often trumps reason. Again, they probably grabbed the usable simple scraps like boxes, cots, and metal tubing from the ships before sending the pinnacles of their technology into the sun.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    58. Re:Two changes that could've been made by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      Cavil, Simon, and the other guy were not so religious. "The other guy" was told by one six that he could "barely speak God's name," in fact.

    59. Re:Two changes that could've been made by HereIAmJH · · Score: 1

      I thought they were inconsistent with their handling of technology. For instance, they have raptors they can land anywhere they choose (for instance, Galen being dropped on an island). So why do we see a column of people marching off in search of a new place to live? And they did keep at least one raptor, Adama carries off Rosalyn in it.

      I would have believed the whole "let's give up the ships and live on this planet" story line if it was only Galactica, since it was essentially dead. Having recently re-read Robinson Crusoe, I have to think they would have stripped whatever they felt they could have used, given the opportunity. You see Baltar and Caprica talking about farming, and realize that you have seen no farming implements. Helo and Athena are discussing who will teach Hera to hunt, and you've seen no weapons of any kind for hunting. The only reason I can see for sending the ships into the sun and abandoning all technology would be to hide from the cylons, and that wasn't the case. Individuals might choose to do it, but not a whole society.

      Like some others here, I wasn't unhappy seeing Rosalyn die. I was tired of the drama associated with her character. Kind of like I became sick of Starbuck after the season of her and Lee.

      --
      Another day, another update to a Google android app.
    60. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Digitus1337 · · Score: 1

      You are not the only one. I don't understand why such a big deal was made of Hera or what point the Opera House served (literally as well as metaphorically). The Admiral going off to live alone was pointless. The idea that Kara came back to lead them to Earth -and- another Earth, which happens to have the coordinates of the notes of an inspired song, is ludicrous.

      The ending showed that it wouldn't have mattered if the colonials were wiped out at any point during the series. Most of them will die in short order, all of them will have their life spans drastically reduced. The cycle wasn't broken, there was nothing left over to learn from so that humans wouldn't repeat their mistakes.

      The ending made the entire series seem worthless.

    61. Re:Two changes that could've been made by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they got rid of technology so the rebel cylons wouldn't notice them should they come near the area by chance?

      I really didn't think it was that hard to figure that part out.

      Cylon jumps in, bunch of ships and tech on the planet, look its just like new caprica.

      Or Cylon jumps in, doesn't see anything of value and moves on.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    62. Re:Two changes that could've been made by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      You assume they die just because they have advanced technology? You do realize that the human race here was able to survive before we came up with our current technology, right?

      They didn't give up their knowledge or wisdom, they got rid of physical devices, but they didn't suddenly become unable to hunt or gather or build shelter.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    63. Re:Two changes that could've been made by servognome · · Score: 1

      Take the smartest most adept metalurgical expert, put him/her out in the woods with a set of clothes, a tent, a pocket knife, and one friend. Call me when they manage to find enough ore, which they can dig out in sufficient quantity with sticks, to blast into metal which they can then work into a simple thing like a spoon.

      A good metallurgist would have enough geology, pottery, & processing knowledge to do this. Metallurgy is an ancient practice.

      The fact is, they needed the remnants to get a start on what they'd need to learn to survive. Throwing it away means most won't survive. In essence, it was a stupid and suicidal ending

      Not necessarily. They could have pulled the simple tools like boxes, axes, shovels, etc, and been trained in basic survival, fishing, hunting, and farming before being loosed into the world.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    64. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Brian_Ellenberger · · Score: 1

      I hated the ending. The unilateral decision to get rid of all technology for everybody was both absurd, short-sighted, and just plain stupid.

      The every day lives of most of the people on the fleet was terrible. They were confined in these sparse metal containers where they were chased by robots of their own creation. They had almost died of thirst and starved and often went hungry. From the looks of the food distribution, it appears they lived off of dried algae pellets. Maybe it was short-sighted, but after all that it is understandable they weren't the biggest fans of technology.

      Another point is that this isn't some new fangled idea in Sci-Fi. The whole premise of Dune was a similar idea. Remember the Butlerian Jihad?

      Sure there is a risk of viruses, infections, etc. But a bunch of AI robots just nuked 12 planets filled with humans, so I might just take my risk with the viruses. And we didn't get a chance to understand their full "limits" of technology. Maybe they were OK with medical technology, but that info was just lost. Everyone was loaded up with equipment, so they didn't seem intent on going into "immediate tribal" mode. Nor did they know it would take 150k+ years to get back to an "electronic age". Could be they just thought it would take 10k years instead of the normal 2-4k. But from previous events it appears that no matter what path they take, it requires thousands of years to get back to the technological level that the colonies were at before the fall.

      All in all, you may not agree with their decision but after suffering so much due to technology it is completely understandable that they would want to shun it.

    65. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Brian_Ellenberger · · Score: 1

      The fact is, they needed the remnants to get a start on what they'd need to learn to survive. Throwing it away means most won't survive. In essence, it was a stupid and suicidal ending. It's no different than if they found earth and then decided to commit suicide by staying on the ships and flying into the sun.

      First, they were carrying some equipment so it isn't like they abandoned everything. Also, I'm sure that 30k people could easily live off of the earth even without farming. Somehow our ancestors managed to figure it out. And I thought it was obvious from Baltar's comment that some of them knew quite a bit about agriculture. There were a number of people in the fleet from Aerilon who I assume were involved heavily into agriculture. They managed to live a year on New Caprica, which was a much less fertile place.

    66. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That island where the technological people went to would obviously be Atlantis.

    67. Re:Two changes that could've been made by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      I agree, I liked the nearly seemless jump of the "visions" from old Caprica streets to New York. That part was perfect to establish the "it has happened before, it will happen again" cycle.

      The whole "robot montage" was unneeded, almost insulting. It felt like we dropped to "documentary" mode and it ruined the feeling of the shows real ending. It felt like a cheap "knowing is half the battle" thing rather than serious sci-fi. Too many anime series have ended with that style to bring "reality" to you that they should have known better than do do the "robot" scenes... especially as bad "TV" spots.

    68. Re:Two changes that could've been made by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      he wanted to keep the evolutionists happy.

    69. Re:Two changes that could've been made by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      There was no more quorum, Adama just made the decision for everybody. The 38k (down from 50k) people were just glad to be on solid, habitable ground again to raise a protest.

    70. Re:Two changes that could've been made by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      much of the technology was "dead end" anyway. You couldn't build an Intel CPU fab from sticks and stones and left over pieces they had for 50 years.... their technology was already gone, the choice was to spend all their resources starting over, or to let technology go and have a clean slate.

    71. Re:Two changes that could've been made by kv9 · · Score: 1

      As it stands, it was too overt and tried too hard to make its point for viewers already accustomed to needing to think a bit more.

      that's a constant thing with the show (more so for the last two seasons). it's just rude. but, hey... SYFY!

    72. Re:Two changes that could've been made by anagama · · Score: 3, Informative

      I do pottery. I even built and fire a high temperature kiln based on 1500 year old technology: "anagama". The task would be incredibly daunting to find suitable clay and then dig it up. When I built my kiln, I did much of the digging with pick and shovel. The soil was a mixture of clay and rock that is almost indistinguishable from concrete. I bent a pick and broke shovels. I permanently injured my elbow such that I can't ever play video games or even use a hammer without having rather severe pain. About half the digging was done by my neighbor who had an excavator -- let me tell you, after two months of digging, watching that thing scoop out a wheelbarrow at a time was almost enough to bring tears to my eyes.

      Now, what I did isn't so amazing -- I was able to buy shovels and other steel tools. I used hand saws and later after my elbow problem, power tools. I could buy pre-cut wood, cinderblocks, bags of concrete, and high temperature bricks. To do this all from scratch with nothing but sticks and antlers for picks would have take me years. Each firebrick weighs 9 pounds. I used about 3000. How long would it take a person to dig 27000 pounds of clay. Pulverize it and process it and move it to where the ore is? Just so you know, good high temperature bricks are low in iron so the deposits to make the bricks probably aren't near the area with the good ore.

      Then you have wood. One firing in my kiln uses about 4.5 cords. That is a stack of wood 8.5' tall, 8' wide, and 8' deep. A good cord or more needs to be chopped down to kindling size. Ever tried to chop wood without a maul? I haven't either. How about cutting down trees with stones and antler bits? Me neither.

      Etc. etc.

      You people are underestimating the amazing amount of work we get from fossil fuel burning equipment, electrical equipment, or even simple human powered metal tools. Even if you manage to build the infrastructure, the energy requirements to smelt metal or make pottery are amazingly large. You only get to expend that energy after you have enough food to survive and have free time to work on other things. Knowledge is good, but without energy to put it to work and food to keep you alive, it is unlikely to prove of much value.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    73. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      You couldn't get 100 people to agree to take 100 free $20 bills (some would feel they should get 2, some would feel they shouldn't get 1, etc.)

      Since the author's *addressed it* thru the president and adama, I let it slip without dinging them.

      But in reality, I think having 10% or so head off in their own ships would have been more realistic (but also taken another 15 to 20 minute dealing with them).

      After the revolution, there may not have been much will to resist adama any more.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    74. Re:Two changes that could've been made by kv9 · · Score: 1

      for future (present?) day humans to gain access to the advanced remnants of Galactica and co.

      myes... advanced... like those 1945 submarine fucking phones they had on Galactica. !@#$%^&*

    75. Re:Two changes that could've been made by anagama · · Score: 1

      I'm not a hunter but I'm guessing its not so easy as everyone wants to believe. As for gathering food -- they can't analyze the properties. How many people will die using "what happens when I eat this" test?

      You saw the lines of people heading out with backpacks. The whole idea that a majority of those people don't die with the meagre resources on their backs is ludicrous.

      Finally, it really doesn't matter how much specialized intelligence one has if you aren't going to get to use it because of death. Death from unsafe water, unsafe food, lack of water, lack of food, exposure, small injuries, etc. etc. We are so immersed in technology, we can't even see it. Things like cups, soap, cooking utensils, hand tools -- this is technology and without it, we get in trouble quite quickly. Now, someone who has an immune system accustomed to drinking out of rivers and eating poorly cooked game is probably going to survive long enough to reproduce. The colonials, especially the civilians waiting for a handout from Gaius -- they're tiger meat.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    76. Re:Two changes that could've been made by anagama · · Score: 1

      Everyone lives within their technological milieu. Let's presume Baltar has seeds -- and lets hope they're not hybrids as those are often sterile. His farming experience certainly involved tractors, tools, fertilizers, perhaps pesticides, soil characteristics of his home world. There will be a lot of experimentation to figure out if any of that transfers. Guess wrong early on = no food, starve to death. Of course, with no tools it will be a real pain to come up with shelter too -- I suppose food trumps shelter so they'll have to tough it outside. What happens when their clothes have rotted off?

      The ending is totally ridiculous unless you presume it was meant to show the colonials die off.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    77. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did keep a Raptor, that's what The Old Man was flying around in. They probably kept some other stuff and planned their descent into primitive life.

      I have great issues with their abandonment of technology at that point as well, both in how it was presented and how viable an option it was for human survival.

      Theoretically they could have just enforced it on the masses by kicking them out of the ships, but if that was the case they should have presented that instead of giving us the extra unnecessary flashbacks and the extended ending

    78. Re:Two changes that could've been made by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      The FTL drives alone are way beyond anything we can make. Hell, how about the ability to create a mostly self-enclosed environment that can last for years? Artifical Gravity? Air Recycling? The list goes on and on.

    79. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1

      The wheel. The horse collar. The plow. Knowledge of calendars and seasons. Breeding crops and animal husbandry. Alphabetic language. Pottery you don't need high-temperature kilns for. None of these require hyper-advanced infrastructure, but they changed human society and the very face of the planet when they were invented. None of the colonials are going to forget things _this_ simple, nor fail to pass them on to their descendants.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    80. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Homer1946 · · Score: 1

      The MOST valuable technology they had were refined metals. If they wanted to keep the entire population from starving to death they needed to make such things as metal plows, and pronto. At the VERY least they would have landed the ships (that could be landed) and mined them for their metal. The ending was stupid. And I loved the show so I hated that. It left me feeling empty inside.

    81. Re:Two changes that could've been made by frogzilla · · Score: 1

      Really. This is a science FICTION series. Do you think that the ending was the only thing on the show to be implausible? The series was fun to watch but it's just entertainment (even though they included much commentary and critique of current problems in human society). The people who made the show can do whatever they want.

    82. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Orange+Crush · · Score: 1

      They left the colonies with around 50,000 people. By the time they reach Earth Mk 2, there's around 30,000 remaining alive. So let's say half the original colonials survived since a portion of the remaining population were born after the holocaust. 5 years. A healthy person can survive a couple months without food. Knowing how to farm won't help here, because plants don't grow instantly. So they must survive on provisions, foraging and fishing and hunting.

    83. Re:Two changes that could've been made by anagama · · Score: 1

      Ever try to make a wheel? Where do they get horses? Why presume the seasons are exactly like those they are used to? Breeding crops works a whole lot better when you can till the soil. Low temperature pottery has serious drawbacks, one being porosity which can cause spoilage and sickness. Not too many centuries ago, salt glazed stoneware was high tech -- finally a vessel and glaze that was impervious to acid, a very important thing when the method of preservation was often pickling. Even having storage jars where liquids will not seep in or out requires temperatures far in excess of pit firing. It would kind of suck if all those nuts you gathered spoiled because water got on the pot and seeped in.

      These are all things that would be made infinitely more plausible with scrap metal to get them through the first couple years to self-sufficiency.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    84. Re:Two changes that could've been made by servognome · · Score: 1

      I even built and fire a high temperature kiln based on 1500 year old technology: "anagama". The task would be incredibly daunting to find suitable clay and then dig it up.

      You were building a high temperature kiln, while early tools could be made by smelting low temperature metals like copper with a well designed hole in the ground.

      You people are underestimating the amazing amount of work we get from fossil fuel burning equipment, electrical equipment, or even simple human powered metal tools. Even if you manage to build the infrastructure, the energy requirements to smelt metal or make pottery are amazingly large. You only get to expend that energy after you have enough food to survive and have free time to work on other things. Knowledge is good, but without energy to put it to work and food to keep you alive, it is unlikely to prove of much value.

      You underestimate the resources and time available to people.
      First, unless they were truly suicidal, they would have settled in fertile areas, good soil, climate, water, and trees. In such areas they would have been able to sustain themselves hunting, fishing and farming with wooden tools. This would give them plenty of time to do things like dig clay, and explore the rocks. There is a lot of free time when you don't have the internet to keep you entertained :)

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    85. Re:Two changes that could've been made by _bug_ · · Score: 1

      Brilliant idea! You might then tie that destroyed technological colony to the mythology of Atlantis.

    86. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, in a nutshell, you kind of hinted\touched on things that did happen and leave the envelope open. First, the colony was sent on a one way trip into the Sun. Like myself, you suppose they eventually burn up. I didnt see that happen. The boy in the bathtub can maybe beam to the next episode/earth. After all, he has a shitload of cylon paint that never dried on those galactica beams. Another point you made is the mention of them leaving a raptor on earth. We also never saw what happened to the admiral's (raptor) that he and the president were flying after she died and he landed at their/his new cabin spot. I too was wondering the same kind of things. Why kill all the ships just to make a moral stand? I think again that leaves many angles open for review and interpretation.

    87. Re:Two changes that could've been made by servognome · · Score: 1

      Everyone lives within their technological milieu. Let's presume Baltar has seeds -- and lets hope they're not hybrids as those are often sterile. His farming experience certainly involved tractors, tools, fertilizers, perhaps pesticides, soil characteristics of his home world.

      The "soil characteristics" is a good point, but I can suspend disbelief given that the native earthlings evolved so similarly that I would suspect all the life on earth would be similar to the colonies.
      Any one who is a farmer, and not just a tractor driver would have a deep knowledge of the fundamentals of farming. Tractors, fertilizers, pesticides - those are all efficiency technologies used to support huge populations.
      Somebody with farming knowledge would understand how to evaluate the soil, find plants to domesticate, use sticks to plow the land, use animal droppings to enhance the soil, etc.
      Again, it's important to note that the colonists (except the chief) were being dropped in fertile areas which were capable of sustaining hunter/gatherers. Rudimentary survival skills would be enough to sustain life.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    88. Re:Two changes that could've been made by servognome · · Score: 1

      These are all things that would be made infinitely more plausible with scrap metal to get them through the first couple years to self-sufficiency.

      They were dropped off in areas sustaining earthling hunter/gatherers.
      Presumably these places had enough freely available food and stability in climate that things like pottery, farming, or any of those other basic techs would not be necessary for survival.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    89. Re:Two changes that could've been made by cskrat · · Score: 1

      What about losing everyone you know? Family, friends, coworkers, that cute girl that serves you coffee all gone. The only people around you are a random assortment of strangers that just happened to be at a particular museum opening with you.

      Yeah the story had serendipitous back stories with the survivors. But that's expected since the story was mainly told from the setting of Galactica where the people there had already been serving together for some time.

      --
      My God! It's full of eval()'s.
    90. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one said they didn't bring a lot basic tools, books, pens, pencils and whatnot. Just no advanced technology to speak of. Also, 40,000 people, MANY of them being military, many of them coming from the 'lower-class' farming planets, you're going to have people that know how to survive and can pass it on to the others.

    91. Re:Two changes that could've been made by tyrione · · Score: 1

      Heck, crossbreeding the galactica crew with neanderthal humans would probably have resulted in humans too unintelligent to use the galactica tech; add a few generations and the technology is gone from society; you could leave the rest of the storyline intact but explain the loss of technology.

      The humans that they showed in the show were clearly not Neanderthals. They were too tall, too lean, and in the wrong spot (Africa vs Europe). That aside, most research indicates that Neanderthals weren't likely to be any less intelligent than modern humans. If they could mate with the members of the RTF, the offspring would be intellectually fine.

      Wanna bet? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neanderthal

    92. Re:Two changes that could've been made by tgd · · Score: 1

      Then 150,000 years later it could come crashing back down, thankfully cloaked, into San Francisco Bay!

    93. Re:Two changes that could've been made by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      I'm trying to find anything in that article disproving my statement, and I'm not seeing it.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    94. Re:Two changes that could've been made by euri.ca · · Score: 1

      > though easier at the end of the series than the begining

      That bothered me too, my best explanation is that the Marines would normally have police-style bullets (slower, emphasis on not ricocheting) to put down mutinies on an aircraft carrier. As the show progressed (especially after meeting Pegasus) they could be replaced with armour piercing bullets when needed.

    95. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess wrong early on = no food, starve to death.

      If only they had a hunter-gatherer culture to observe to learn how to sustain themselves.

    96. Re:Two changes that could've been made by euri.ca · · Score: 1

      And who knows what they would've been able to trade for food (which is the standard model for an expedition landing in a less technologically advanced area). At an antelope for a metal bar, they could survive quite a while (try building metal bars with Y-150K technology).

    97. Re:Two changes that could've been made by drmitch · · Score: 1

      Life on earth seemed to get along without this stuff. I was kinda half asleep when I saw the finale, but wasn't it a military/executive decision to leave technology? I do agree with StandardCell about separating the colonials into technology/non-technology. I am watching the series again and it's incredible all the things they tie in to the finale. It's like they knew the story, start to end, before writing the second episode!

    98. Re:Two changes that could've been made by dajalas · · Score: 1

      I've never hated a series finale like this. It's genuinely difficult to mess up TV this badly. I despise BSG after that ending. I've deleted all copies on PC and Tivo. I will not watch any spin-offs.

      Sci-fi fans aren't the proper demographic for this. The idea that "tech causes us to be evil" is irrational propaganda. The idea that the "good life" requires that we get rid of technology is utterly irrational.

    99. Re:Two changes that could've been made by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      Right, because it would have made more sense for them to land in our past with their hyperspace technology and for that technological gap to have NO EFFECT ON US WHATSOEVER.

      So, yes, you're the only one. That makes you special and better than the rest of us plebes, so stop complaining and enjoy your awesomeness.

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    100. Re:Two changes that could've been made by tarius8105 · · Score: 1

      Take the smartest most adept metalurgical expert, put him/her out in the woods with a set of clothes, a tent, a pocket knife, and one friend. Call me when they manage to find enough ore, which they can dig out in sufficient quantity with sticks, to blast into metal which they can then work into a simple thing like a spoon. Probably not as difficult as your previous example. Making a spoon isnt hard, now if we're talking a spoon with the least amount of impurities I'll agree with you it cant be done so easily. You also dont need to make a spoon out of metal, you could easily do it with wood.

    101. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another thing is that there were a lot of Alcoholics on that ship. I cant see Adama and Ti making it two days without some hard liquor. Sure, they can make some wine or something, but these guys need to good good stuff to function. I don't know if they realized that before it was too late. I think maybe Ti did when the wife said all she wanted was to be with him all the time. He got a strange look on his face.. Poor guy..

    102. Re:Two changes that could've been made by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      "evolutionists". wtf is an evolutionist? Someone with more than 2 brain cells?

    103. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Bradac_55 · · Score: 1

      "Take the smartest most adept computer engineer in the world, put him/her out in the woods with a set of clothes, a tent, and a pocket knife. Call me when he returns with a functioning computer."

      That call would never come, he'd be dead in a couple of days since it's his first trip away from mom's basement.

      ~

      The "metalurgical expet" (??) would have died as well since they have never worked in the construction field and would not know what to do without the grunt labor.

    104. Re:Two changes that could've been made by bbasgen · · Score: 1

      Because the alternative was a short, dirty, uncomfortable, powerless existence inside a tin can where you play jump roulette. The common civilian spent their lives huddled on cots, and served as slaves to the technology that kept them alive. There would be a great sense of freedom to make your own life apart from the caste of fixing computers, processing fuel, and eating algae all day.

      They did not do justice to this idea -- much of the finale was very rushed -- but I think you've nailed it exactly. They could have shown shots of the masses in the fleet in cramped quarters, even conversations on other fleet ships: what now, etc.... they really could have played up the concept that the fleet had become slaves to technology. This would have been a quite compelling contradiction: while toasters had been our slaves, in so doing, we also became slaves to them. This could have been a central theme to the denouement.

      In general, they would have been better served by making two different episodes: the final battle and earth. The latter was quite choppy, pieced together, and didn't really have a story or real meaning.

    105. Re:Two changes that could've been made by furby076 · · Score: 1

      2. What probably would've happened after Lee recommended all technology go away is a split between those who still wanted it and those who didn't. The two sides would create a pact to keep separate from each other, the small minority of technology-loving people going to live on a small continent off the west coast of Africa... Said continent, of course, to have been destroyed at some future point in time by natural disaster and essentially all technology along with it. This would solve what would be an obvious dilemma and split in viewpoints of the remaining people while reasonably explaining what would've happened to their technology.

      Wouldn't work...2 to 3 generations later they would come and conquer the less technologically equipped family members and then enslave them. Two situations to help explain why it "worked" to go low-tech
      1) These people lived inside sardine cans fighting technology which nearly wiped out the entire population. They wanted a break from technology so had a knee-jerk reaction. There are a few who wanted their tech but they were vastly outnumbered.
      2) Their gov't was more about dictatorship then anything else. In many of the episodes the military told the elected gov't to sit down and STFU. It is no surprise if they said "give us your technology" when they checked off the ships. They could do it at gunpoint or willingly - it would happen.

      Anyhow - it's sci-fi and requires the viewer to enjoy a huge dose of suspension of disbelief. There are tons of things in the movie that are unbelievable (Kara Thrace is an angel?, Baltar/Six are angels?). If you are accepting of those things then people giving up their high-tech should not be that unreasonable.

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
    106. Re:Two changes that could've been made by furby076 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't work. 2-3 generations down the road "hey we are short on supplies, let's go take some. We got guns, ships - they have....wooden bows". The tv series always underlined the military has the final say. So all the military needed to do, for the dissenters, was commander all relevant technology (they probably kept things like wrist-watches, and medical equipment like syringes, etc).

      What I found silly was the splitting up of the 35,000 people. Considering one doctor, and other trained skills that may not be widely available? I know which group I would want to be with.

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
    107. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, how about the ability to create a mostly self-enclosed environment that can last for years?

      Done.

      Artifical Gravity?

      When you have constant thrust like Galactica, this is not hard. Otherwise you need to spin.

      Air Recycling?

      Done.

      Submarines already do most of what you're thinking. Space Stations like the ISS, MIR, and Skylab have done the rest.

    108. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      The extreme spoon feeding of the plot was annoying and insulting. It was also beneath the show.

      You know, normally I'd agree with you, but given the number of comments I've seen on the Net about things like, "Wait, so Racetrack was dead when she fired the nukes?" or even "So was Baltar responsible for allowing Six into the defense mainframe?"; it's clear that some people out there wouldn't get it even if the show came with a companion text that explained everything.

    109. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      So are we to believe that simple non-life threatening infections now all of a sudden become deadly because of the basic lack of antibiotics?

      They were running out of antibiotics anyway, remember when Anders was sick with some disease on Mudworld and Starbuck had to go beg Fat Lee for medicine?

      Ug, what an unbelievably crappy ass implausible ending to an otherwise awesome series... Am I the only one that feels like this???

      No, but all of you are wrong. :)

    110. Re:Two changes that could've been made by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      Done.

      I should elaborate; can we make a self enclosed space that can survive for years in the vacume of space? That can withstand a nuclear strike?

      When you have constant thrust like Galactica, this is not hard. Otherwise you need to spin.

      I get the sense that Galctica and company are not constantly on the move in normal space. They seem to usually stand relativly still until there's a need to jump.

      Submarines already do most of what you're thinking. Space Stations like the ISS, MIR, and Skylab have done the rest.

      Perhaps, the fleet is still capable of doing it better.

    111. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The message that I got at the end was that maybe we will get it right this time. Instead of war erupting between man and machine this world of humans might be able to accept sentient machines as our equals (see Data) instead of makeing them slaves. Like Head-Six said "let a cycle repeat enough times and it just might surprise you".

    112. Re:Two changes that could've been made by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but after 5 years, I'd expect that thos who survive have more spunk in them than that ... after fighting for 5 years, and spending their whole lives in a very tech/machine-oriented environment, to give it up would be a shock of the same magnitude.

      It just doesn't make sense.

    113. Re:Two changes that could've been made by cskrat · · Score: 1

      Alright, how about this.
      With no central organization tying the survivors of the 13 colonies together and therefore no enforcement of the "no tech" rule, some groups did hold on to whatever technology they could. Those groups begin fighting each other in an attempt to claim each other's tech hoard. The fighting expends ammo and destroys equipment that cannot be replaced and they end up with a bunch of high tech lawn ornaments, no food reserves, no agriculture and a harsh winter coming in a geographical area chosen for the best defensive position rather than the best ability to sustain life. The few remaining survivors abandon camp and attempt to migrate to warmer climates. The women and children die along the way because they aren't strong enough to compete with the men for food. The men leave no descendants.

      149,997 years later robots learn to dance, badly.

      In the end we saw a fleet of ships fly into Sol. We didn't see where the generators, small arms, medical supplies or food rations went. The scenario I described above could have played out or they could have made a plan to use what dying tech they had left to help them survive long enough to adapt to this new world.

      To me it feels like you're looking for someone to tell you that Clarisse McClellan is still alive at the end of the story. Personally, I think Moore ended things the way he did so that he wouldn't be called back in a few years to make BSG: The Next Generation. We don't know how much, if any, technology they held on to. We don't know that Gaius didn't carve everything he knew about mathematics and science on some cave wall just so that a passing glacier could wipe it clean again. All we know is that it takes a little over 150,000 years to get back to the level of tech the series started with and that little Hera survives long enough to have children of her own.

      --
      My God! It's full of eval()'s.
    114. Re:Two changes that could've been made by servognome · · Score: 1

      "Dirty Hands," "Black Market," and a couple other episodes in the series try to deal with the common man's problems, but they were aired so long ago they don't resonate to help make the leave-it-all-behind ending work.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    115. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Dasher42 · · Score: 1

      I think that these days it's easy to get wrapped up in our civilization and lose perspective on where humanity came from.

      You should read books about the Kung-San people of the Kalahari, as they were until their culture was obliterated in the past couple decades. They had a rather good life as hunter-gatherers, in a desert. Now, the majority of humanity's existence has been spent in this state, and for a good reason.

      A lot of human ingenuity goes unsung in the modern day where it seems taken for granted that not much happened prior to the bronze age - a definite mistake IMHO.

    116. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I should elaborate; can we make a self enclosed space that can survive for years in the vacume of space? That can withstand a nuclear strike?

      Allow me to elaborate, then. YES.

      Nuclear weapons are not nearly as destructive in space as they are in an atmosphere. Thus Galactica is able to handle the strikes the old fashioned way: By cladding the ship in thick, ribbed steel that can flex and handle tremendous load capacity.

      The WWII generation called that "Armor".

      I get the sense that Galctica and company are not constantly on the move in normal space. They seem to usually stand relativly still until there's a need to jump.

      In space, everything is relative. 1g of acceleration seems frighteningly fast here on Earth, but in space it's barely moving. Our current chemical-powered pop-caps can't even manage that.

      Galactica spends most of her time in deep space with engines running. If her engines are running, she's going somewhere. It's simple thermodynamics. (For every action...) The question is, why are her engines running if she's not going anywhere? While the show doesn't make sense of it, the obvious reason for a spacecraft to do so would be gravity.

      Perhaps, the fleet is still capable of doing it better.

      It all comes down to experience. We have a piddling space program. We can do better, but we don't have any solid reason to do so. Until we have a solid reason, that's unlikely to change. Once we DO have a reason, Galactica will be one of the smaller things floating around.

    117. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have found the Atlantis tie-in cheesy. Going to the "real" 2nd earth was bad enough. The whole crappy Lucy and mitochondrial DNA crap connection is the worse.

      At least with the giving up of technology, it was understandable. All the hell that rained down on them again and again (cylons, first war, second war/human genocide). The years following the lost second war. All the people they lost. Being surrounded by great technology in ships, weaponry, food and fuel tech, did shit for them; even when not under attack, they led crappy refugee lives.

      Now they come across the world, and you don't think that for once, what's left, a small city, would have a huge majority thinking scrap this crap, and the minority clinging thinking about it and being persuaded to go with the majority?

      There was nothing left. Even after the conflict was over, they still lost.

      If you are still unpersuaded, what do you have to go through, at what point DO you give up technology? To me, their decision en masse seemed quite believable.

    118. Re:Two changes that could've been made by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      Science channel was doing a show about the "Big Bang" and when the first calculations were released the Universe was "only" 2 billion years old.. biological evolutionists (i.e. not mathematicians) cried it was "wrong" because it didn't fit their pretend number of zeros needed. So the physicist "researched" until he came up with numbers that made the "evolutionists" happy.... yeah, sure they're not a religion.

    119. Re:Two changes that could've been made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no you are not. the ending sucked. BSG jumped the shark after the trial of Baltar.

  15. Disappointed in the ending? by orkybash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Originally posted this over on Bear McCreary's blog, but I think I'll use it here too...

    I think most people who complain about the finale not meeting their expectations are the people whose expectations included a cereberal explanation for everything that happened on the show. And I'll admit, I was hoping for a little more in that arena. But in terms of emotional wrap-up and as a fitting send-off to the show, I thought it couldn't have done better.

    To people who wanted every mystery tied up nice and neat, I hate to break it to you but it was never that kind of show. Moore has said from the beginning that certain supernatural aspects wouldn't be explained.

    Go watch Lost or something.

    1. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      What I liked about the ending is that Ronald D. Moore left enough ambiguity that we could argue about this ad nauseum, but yet, had enough clarity that we did have something that the finale of The Sopranos lacked: final closure.

      The last images of the robots we see on the widescreen TV's perfect demonstrate George Santayana's most famous quote: those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.

    2. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by jdbausch · · Score: 5, Insightful

      except... if the show constantly begs the question "what is Kara Thrace?" and uses that hook to bring you in, you need to answer it. Even the promos were saying "the truth will be revealed" Sorry, but to not deliver that, once you kept asking the question, is cheap. It is like saying, watch this show because there are these questions you want answered. They answered some, but not all. Ridiculing viewers for not liking this treatment is blaming the victim. I personally thought the whole finale was fine, even with all the plot holes, things that did not make sense, and all the rest. I never really cared about finding Kara's status, or that of the "head characters", or any of the spirituality aspects - I figured they would be written off as spiritual in some way. what really killed it for me was the existence of our "earth" They already showed an "earth" that looked just like our earth. It was destroyed, not habitable. No explainations given as to why this new "earth" has continents that look EXACTLY like the other "earth". At the end of the day, there is only one explaination. The show told us that "cinder earth" was in fact our earth. They did this so that we would not think that finding our earth was an option. But then they did find our earth. They cheated. they tricked us. Without any kind of other explaination given, that is the only conclusion we can draw. and it's bullshit. You can't cheat your viewers and expect them to like it. Those that think it is all good are battered wives, coming back for more. Lost is 10 times the show that BSG is. I might not have said that before this finale, but I have no doubt about it now. At least it has not cheated the audience.

    3. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by jdbausch · · Score: 1

      dammit! that should say: They did this so that we would not think that finding our earth was NOT an option.

    4. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by saforrest · · Score: 1

      No explainations given as to why this new "earth" has continents that look EXACTLY like the other "earth"

      I'll grant your feelings of being cheated and share them to a degree. (The science of Mitochondrial Eve was just ridiculous; we will never, ever find a skeleton we can prove is Mitochondrial Eve.)

      But to my knowledge in Galactica's visit to "cinder Earth" they never showed continents, or anything that looked recognizably like our Earth. Granted that Three did say something about "the same on Mars", definitely suggesting it was the Solar System. But if they are to have an original Earth, why not an original Mars as well?

      The only time they showed Earth before the finale, to my knowledge, was the end of season 3 when they panned out of the Milky Way and zoomed into Earth. But that can be resolved by arguing that what we saw then was the second, non-destroyed Earth.

    5. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or, in this case, "those who don't remember a TV show are doomed to re-enact it?"

      The same anti-technology crap that Ron Moore changed BSG into in the last couple seasons is the same old stuff sf has been giving us since the original Star Trek, or Forbidden Planet. As a theme, it's completely, utterly washed out-- not interesting. The worst of the cliches.

      People like you for some reason suck it up like a Hoover, when it's all based on 1950s-esque atom bomb fear. You've seen it a million times before. Can we move on to something else in sf, please!?

    6. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by discord5 · · Score: 1

      I think most people who complain about the finale not meeting their expectations are the people whose expectations included a cereberal explanation for everything that happened on the show.

      I think that the final conclusion was a bit far-fetched. I mean, put yourself in the shoes of a space-faring civilization on the run for a minute. After having your family, friends and what-not being nuked, spending several years on the run from a robot-race out to kill you while the number of people around you dwindles. Then when finally you've dealt a definitive blow to the enemy, and by pure coincidence (or the work of "God", whatever) happen to find a planet that you can settle on you're going to give up technology?

      We're talking a space-faring civilization that's giving up toilet paper here. Not just toilet paper, hot showers, medicine, security, and in the end what the entire show was about : survival of the human race (the spacefaring kind, not the "oh look what just crawled down from the trees" kind). It just seems very unplausible that of a population of 30.000-something people everyone simply quietly goes "Oh, well, we won't miss toilet paper anyway" and go live the life of the survivalist hunter-gatherer.

      Moore has said from the beginning that certain supernatural aspects wouldn't be explained.

      Ah yes, the man who said "Screw plot, let's make it about the characters" and decided after a night of drinking "Let's make some of the characters the final cylons". Don't get me wrong, it's an interesting show, and I've enjoyed it for the most part, but it has plotholes coming out of the wazoo. Simply pointing at the heavens while shouting the words "Angels" and "God" doesn't explain things. The man picked 4 of the cylons based on "What would shock our viewers most?" instead of "How can we wrap this thing without compromising the story".

      It's kind of like when you're reading a book where 900 pages deal with "the grand plan", and the last 100 pages the writer has a nervous breakdown and concludes with "and they lived happily ever after".

      Go watch Lost or something.

      No thanks. Last I heard the island was time-traveling, and Locke was well on his way to becoming the second coming of our lord and savior by resurrecting after he died, only without the nailing to the cross and stabbing with a spear (I would've watched that for sheer entertainment value only).

    7. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by anagama · · Score: 1

      YES! Permanent boycott of the Sci-Fear genre.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    8. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by darpo · · Score: 1

      Actually, I disliked the last episode, and I think it was over-explained and too neatly finished. The last bit at the end, 150,000 years later? That should have been left off. We don't need everything laid out. For a show that relied on mystery, that last part was anti-mysterious.

      And there were way too many neat explanations. Everyone agrees to give up technology? Send the ships off into the sun? The whole series they're scrapping to make use of every little bit of material, and they suddenly give it up? I don't buy it. They send the Centurions off on their own with no concerns? I don't buy it.

      I really loved the first three seasons of this show, but the fourth lost its direction, and the ending was a disappointment.

    9. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by cskrat · · Score: 1

      The ending is just wrapping the series up for a respectful burial. Moore is telling us that this is where the story ends. No BSG: The Next Generation, no dredging up the story line 10-20 years from now and just picking up where things left off. They tied up the loose ends that they could and severed the rest.

      Did you complain about all the lack of loose ends at the end of Harry Potter 7?

      --
      My God! It's full of eval()'s.
    10. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by discord5 · · Score: 1

      Lost is 10 times the show that BSG is. I might not have said that before this finale, but I have no doubt about it now. At least it has not cheated the audience.

      Comparing apples to oranges, etc etc. I don't know how you define "cheating" on the audience, but to summarize lost by season:

      1. Plane crashes on an island with a monster, and there are other people who steal children and kill who gets in their way. Oh, and there's a metal door to obsess about.
      2. Survivors open a hatch, press a magic button that saves the world, then stop pressing making the island glow and the hatch implode. The world doesn't end, but did you see that glow?
      3. The others live on another island, and like having their prisoners chop rocks for no good reason while the doctor gets to perform surgery.
      4. Hurray, some of the survivors (or at least the ones you care about) are saved from the island, and some mercenaries are using big guns on everything that moves.
      5. The island travels through time while John Locke resurrects from the dead and enjoys a mango.

      The show generally takes an entire season of cliffhangers to go through the motions of creating mysteries, not solving them, add some flashbacks (or forward, depending on what season you're in) to create some forced drama. You still don't know WHAT that monster is, why everyone who already was there before the survivors ended up there in the first place, and yet they still keep shoving more layers of mystery on top of it keeping people on the internet occupied with watching the show frame by frame for some clue as to what the hell they're watching.

      The thing that annoys me most about Lost is the fact that on top of it all, nearly every episode needs to end in a cliffhanger. It took 3 episodes of cliffhangers for you to find out what was inside that hatch. Nearly every episode has absolutely nothing happening but a bunch of people running from point A in the jungle to point B on the beach back and forth again, and just when after 50 minutes of this with the occasional flashback, you're about to find out something someone goes "Here, have some more mysteries" and the episode ends. Cliffhangers are a great mechanic, but too much of them and they lose their effect. I can hardly imagine anyone after 5 seasons of this still sits at the edge of their seats without feeling cheated in some way.

      When the Lost finale hits, the BSG finale will seem like "well thought out" and "carefully planned".

    11. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by Bo'Bob'O · · Score: 1

      Except that they did explain everything: It was.. god! (Spooky voice) oooh.

      Every mystery and every major loose end, yeah, that was just divine intervention, divine prophesy. And don't worry, if you aren't sure of that, they spell it out plainly at the end. Where are these loose ends? God did everything. The end. Thank you Dias Ex Machina.

    12. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by jdbausch · · Score: 1

      I hope I'm wrong. I thought that they DID show north america in revalations. If they did not, then I feel much better.

    13. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by jdbausch · · Score: 1

      We'll see. Lost does this: makes you care about a big question. (why are there polar bears on a tropical island?) but when they answer the question, it turns out that: A: the answer leads to other questions (the Dharma's brought them and they got free) or B: the answer doesn't really matter very much in the grand scheme of things (they were training them to be able to move the island) I think their batting average for answering questions is WAY higher than BSG. As I said, I don't really care that Kara was not explained, and I won't if Lost's smoke monster is not explained - both are in the realm of "mystical that may not ever be understood" to me. What I called cheating is the bit with 2 earths. I'm going to go back and check if in revelations they showed "real earth" continents. I recall they did. If they did not, I will retract my "they cheated" comment.

    14. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by BobGregg · · Score: 1

      >>The last images of the robots we see on the
      >>widescreen TV's perfect demonstrate George
      >>Santayana's most famous quote: those who cannot
      >>remember the past are condemned to repeat it.

      Which is about the only thing I didn't like about the finale - the idea that the colonists would have chosen, consciously, to throw away all history and all the lessons they had learned by deliberately hiding their past from their descendants.

      After all they had been through, that seems like the dumbest thing they could possibly have done, and you would think they would know that. They spent the entire series trying to figure out what the hell had happened in their past, and how the cycle was repeating; so the best they can come up with to break the cycle is to forget it all again?! I don't think so.

      That said, the characterization in the last episode was great, and there really was a sense of closure. But undercutting the main lesson of the whole series at the very last second was seriously weak.

    15. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

      I think it's disingenuous to sum up the entire show in the second to last paragraph in that frame. While being accurate to the second season (also the weakest of all of them), the show is a little more than just that. However, I agree with the premise that BSG will have had a better thought out ending than Lost.

      A weakness of Lost is in that every episode has a cliffhanger element and has ruined the cliffhanger for me. But the biggest problem I see with Lost is that as the show as progressed, new nuggets provided continue to produce more conspiracy theory, more nonsense, and more distrust of everything you previously knew. Lost has become a show that I just accept what happens and don't really bother to think about the future anymore - something any producer should never want to happen to their show (I spent hours thinking about how BSG would end, I already forgot what the Lost episode is about this week). And sadly, this disinterest in cliffhangers and thinking has carried over to other shows I enjoy as well. Or perhaps I have become more critical of television as a whole.

      All in all, the biggest problem I have is that JJ Abrams has become too big for himself. He loves referencing all his work in other works, which makes him come across as a major douche. And I find that his overuse of misdirection in his projects fails to make him the "master" of showmanship that he may think he is. But unfortunately Abrams has developed a big enough name for himself such that any project his name is associated with will draw people in and the flaws will be neglected until it becomes too apparent. Alas.

    16. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by jdbausch · · Score: 1
    17. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      The Sopranos ending was brilliant; if you don't understand it, you weren't paying enough attention to the theme of the final season, some things that were said, and some of the very intelligent and subtle camera work. Hint: The camera is following someone in the background

    18. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by discord5 · · Score: 1

      I think it's disingenuous to sum up the entire show in the second to last paragraph in that frame. While being accurate to the second season (also the weakest of all of them), the show is a little more than just that.

      I'll admit that I exaggerated and generalized the show, but it's a feeling I got in many of the episodes and it's something that's stuck with me and really sucked out what I enjoyed about the show.

      And sadly, this disinterest in cliffhangers and thinking has carried over to other shows I enjoy as well. Or perhaps I have become more critical of television as a whole.

      As an off-topic side note, I have that same feeling. I've been dropping a lot of TV shows lately because either the plot was going nowhere, or lost all of its credibility (take this lightly for a genre like science fiction), but there's only two or three shows that I still really follow attentively instead of "the background noise" while I'm doing something else.

      I'd say that it seems like writers for TV shows aren't really trying anymore, but that would be discrediting some writers who actually do a really good job. I've just grown tired of the overused mechanics in storytelling. The cliffhangers are perhaps the worst, but on that list is also the "plot twist within a plot twist", and the worst thing that can happen is when the writers start rewriting a show's history (I don't mean a retcon, just characters contradicting themselves).

      Another thing I really have a problem with is the fact that so few writers (and BSG is guilty of this one) have a general idea of what direction they're going to take from start to end. A few years ago I met someone who draws comic books, as a hobby that got out of hand and now supplements his income. We got into a conversation about it, and I asked him how exactly he creates them. I was amazed at how much preparation he did before he drew the first panel for a book. He would draw up a list of the major plot elements, detail them, draw lists of major characters, details them, give them backgrounds and motivations (even if they aren't revealed to the reader). If he was playing around with ideas he'd set up a timeline. I can't really explain it the way he did, but he did an incredible amount of work for "just a comic", more along the lines what I'd expect from a novelist. And only when he had everything planned, tossed and turned in his sleep for a couple of weeks, only then he'd start picking up a pencil for anything else than character sketches.

      All in all, the biggest problem I have is that JJ Abrams has become too big for himself. He loves referencing all his work in other works, which makes him come across as a major douche.

      The only shows I've watched from JJ Abrams are Lost and Alias. I quickly gave up on Alias since it seemed like it was going nowhere. I'm curious to see what he's going to do to Star Trek though. I'd be really surprised if he manages to do something else than beat a dead horse on that one, but in all honesty I'm not expecting much of it. If the Star Trek movie is going to be as bad as I expect it to be, I'm pretty sure his name will burn in the inevitable flamewars on the internet for a very long time. If he manages to revive trek, kudos to him.

    19. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by Walkingshark · · Score: 1

      I think most people who complain about the finale not meeting their expectations are the people whose expectations included a cereberal explanation for everything that happened on the show. And I'll admit, I was hoping for a little more in that arena. But in terms of emotional wrap-up and as a fitting send-off to the show, I thought it couldn't have done better.

      To people who wanted every mystery tied up nice and neat, I hate to break it to you but it was never that kind of show. Moore has said from the beginning that certain supernatural aspects wouldn't be explained.

      Dude, they made it so that Starbuck was a magical viper-crapping pigeon. The fail was as epic as the story was supposed to be.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    20. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1
      I agree with you about Lost but it has been much more plot oriented this season and I think rivals season 1 as the best season yet. Depending on how things go this season, it may change. But I don't recommend Lost to anyone to watch out of fear that it will do what the Sopranos did.

      Another thing I really have a problem with is the fact that so few writers (and BSG is guilty of this one) have a general idea of what direction they're going to take from start to end.

      Indeed. I was never satisfied with the whole "And they have a plan" because from what I could tell, there wasn't one. I really don't think it's hard to sit down and think about where the show will go as a whole and how many seasons it should cover. I think part of the problem is that they don't want to commit a ton of resources to a show that may not end up working based on viewership.

      While 6 (as in Lost) is a bit much in comparison to BSG's 4 (I just think it's a bit trimmed in terms of fat), it still falls within my rule of 7 seasons max with human cast. Example: X-Files was pretty solid until Duchovny left and that was somewhere in season 6 to 8.

      I've just grown tired of the overused mechanics in storytelling.

      Shows like Burn Notice pull this off very well I think. Psych might be in that boat too. House attempts that a little bit and 24 doesn't much matter because it's often "intense" anyway. But on the whole, I think there is honestly too much competition/reality programming on cable television these days and a lot of it I just have to pick and choose since no one ever shows reruns much anymore since the dvr can only do so much. And with this competition comes the same story elements being constantly used. Shows like Law and Order just too predictable.

      Abrams is tough. I've watched Lost, MI3, Joy Ride, Cloverfield, and Fringe. Lost, as we seem to agree, has it's problems. MI3 was enjoyable but it had references to Lost in the movie. Joy Ride is a generic horror movie that disappoints but I think Leelee Sobieski is hot. Cloverfield was an amazing concept (Blair Witch filming meets monster) and was a great movie to have seen in theaters, BUT all the trailers were incredibly vague on showing the monster - which I found to be laughable upon seeing and I understand why they did. Plus, there's a sequel planned and from what it sounds like, it could just be someone else's perspective. Fringe has similar elements to Lost that piss me off and some of the faux-science is just silly but I really wanted another X-Files and this attempts to fill the niche. Well, as long as it can dodge the Fox effect.

      As for Star Trek, we will have to see but I think it's hard to take it seriously with Shaun of the Dead as Scotty. Based on the trailers it appears to be trendy action movie remake of a classic franchise. But if he can pull it off, I might cut him some slack.

    21. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Cerebral" ending I think you meant? No, I just would've liked a rational one.

    22. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      When the Lost finale hits, the BSG finale will seem like "well thought out" and "carefully planned".

      Given that Lost has had a plan for the ending right from the start, I doubt that.

      I honestly don't get these people who complain that Lost never answers everything. It's not supposed to. Once, or if, it answers everything, the show is finished. Lost is far from perfect, and I personally don't like it as much as I used to, but I still think it's managed to stay suspenseful after 5 seasons.

    23. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by tyrione · · Score: 1

      The ending is just wrapping the series up for a respectful burial. Moore is telling us that this is where the story ends. No BSG: The Next Generation, no dredging up the story line 10-20 years from now and just picking up where things left off. They tied up the loose ends that they could and severed the rest.

      Did you complain about all the lack of loose ends at the end of Harry Potter 7?

      Wheel of Time or Dragonlance, sure, but Harry Potter? That's sad.

    24. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by saforrest · · Score: 1

      I hope I'm wrong. I thought that they DID show north america in revalations. If they did not, then I feel much better.

      They did show North America, but that was in the end of Season 3. During the fleet's actual visit to Cinder Earth, to my knowledge we never saw continents. I remember this particularly because some blogger was even commenting on it at the time.

      The divinely-guided parallel evolution, along with the willing decision to abandon technology, was the hardest pill to swallow. I was kind of hoping that the ultimate reveal, for the BSG characters at least, would be that "second Earth" was actually the original home of humanity before they went to Kobol.

    25. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by speedtux · · Score: 1

      To people who wanted every mystery tied up nice and neat, I hate to break it to you but it was never that kind of show. Moore has said from the beginning that certain supernatural aspects wouldn't be explained.

      There are good ways of leaving a mystery and bad ones; I think this was a bad one.

    26. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      They already showed an "earth" that looked just like our earth. It was destroyed, not habitable.

      Except that they didn't. There was never a shot from space after they jumped to "Earth" that made it clearly identifiable as our Earth.

      The show told us that "cinder earth" was in fact our earth.

      No, it didn't.

    27. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by chromatic · · Score: 1

      How do you explain Kara (a messenger of a higher power) telling Lee upon her reappearance that she'd "been to Earth", then finding her body on this "Earth"? Was she misled? Lying? Covering a plot hole?

    28. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by spifl · · Score: 1

      except... if the show constantly begs the question "what is Kara Thrace?"

      "raises" or possible "asks"..not "begs" http://begthequestion.info/

    29. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      However, that is an implied ending that was difficult to understand if you watched it only once--you had to watch it multiple times to get what David Chase was trying to imply.

      Small wonder why many viewers felt frustrated and cheated by the ending on first viewing.

    30. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      I think you're trying to look at the ending from the modern point of view. As such, it doesn't make sense by 2009 standards.

      Now, place yourself in Lee Adama's point of view. What has he seen for most of his life? Technology run amok that has caused untold suffering. Is it small wonder why in the end when they arrived on "our" Earth they decided on destroying those spaceships?

    31. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      "The only time they showed Earth before the finale, to my knowledge, was the end of season 3 when they panned out of the Milky Way and zoomed into Earth. But that can be resolved by arguing that what we saw then was the second, non-destroyed Earth."

      and the they showed that when Starbuck went "down the rabbit hole" for those 6 months. Starbuck saw that Earth, but nobody else in the story did. It was a teaser to remind us they'd get to AN earth.

      Of course they could have went back to New Caprica or even Kobol after the Colony was destroyed without worrying about it.

    32. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      then again we got Cloverfield.

      Don't get your hopes up.

    33. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it did. Otherwise I think they would have probably went 'wait, the recon pictures don't match the planet below us, WTF?'.

    34. Re:Disappointed in the ending? by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      "Earth" as THEY know it. It wasn't OUR Earth.

  16. Why the "goodriddance" tag? by hellfire · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yanno, I'm not a fanboi of BSG, but I do like it, and feel it's one of the best sci-fi series in a long time. And yet if the show isn't the pinnacle of art, the naysayers on this site come out and get ready to shitcan it. It's unbelievable. If you don't like it, it's fine, don't watch it. But do you have to assassinate it? Criticism is welcome, but if you try to bury it, you aren't going to get more sci-fi series of any quality, just more horror-sci-fi schlock and ghosthunter bullshit that gives the scifi channel the "cheapo paranormal crappy station." Constructive criticism is welcome, but can we cut the crap please?

    PS: This is why I hate tags, are they really any useful or are they just a means of entertaining the ultra-sardonic and cynical?

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

  17. Obviously we will see a Cylons attack Earth Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    right? obviously?

    In a world...
    150,000 years later the cylons finally find the remains of the human race.

    ------
    The series ending was good considering the previous 20-30ish episodes were pretty bad.

    The series started off good and ended nicely (though the last episode may only SEEM good in comparison to the previous REALLY bad last 10 episodes - brushing teeth scenes up the wazoo!) - it was just the middle that the writers ruined.

  18. I was slightly dissapointed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...when Adama stepped into the shower and realized it was all just a dream...

    Mark Edwards
    --
    Proof of Sanity Forged Upon Request

  19. 10 Highlights for those who haven't seen it by Nova+Express · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Baltar constructing his intelligence-enhancing monolith on the plains of Africa.
    2. All 12 Cylon models doing their big Bollywood-esque song and dance number in the central chamber of Cavel's Colony. (Great move snagging Josh Whedon to direct this bit!)
    3. The kick-ass Centurians-vs.-Stormtrooper's fight.
    4. After Kara finishes playing "All Along the Watchtower," she goes into an awesome 9-minute extended version of "Freebird."
    5. The Cylons inventing the science of psychohistory, then creating a secret foundation to shape human destiny.
    6. The smoking hot Boomer-on-Athena lesbian sex scene (can't wanted for the unrated DVD version!)
    7. Doc Cottle's tearful reunion with his long lost wife, Eunice.
    8. Chief Tyrol telling Adama why he can't heal one of the wounded Fours: "I'm a engineer, not a doctor!"
    9. Adama punching Baltar in the face for about five minutes straight.
    10. Starbuck becoming the Starchild.
    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

    1. Re:10 Highlights for those who haven't seen it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish this was true :(

    2. Re:10 Highlights for those who haven't seen it by isj · · Score: 1

      They must have dropped the scene with the thermonuclear sharks.
      I was looking forward to that.

    3. Re:10 Highlights for those who haven't seen it by linebackn · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not to mention the British guy from the future that shows up sporting a dressing gown and holding a towel complaining how some "ultimate program" is now all cocked up by them being there.

    4. Re:10 Highlights for those who haven't seen it by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      The kick-ass Centurians-vs.-Stormtrooper's fight.

      IMO, the Old Centurian vs. New Centurian fight scene was one of the best bits of the whole episode. If nothing else, I'd have liked if we saw more of those guys throughout the course of the show.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    5. Re:10 Highlights for those who haven't seen it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      11. Hera inserts and turns two keys into the control panel of the cylon basestar, begins to glow, and deactivates the self-destruct sequence which would have killed everyone on earth.

    6. Re:10 Highlights for those who haven't seen it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7. Doc Cottle's tearful reunion with his long lost wife, Eunice

      I got that reference without even having to google it. Man, I feel old and more than a little perturbed that I've got such useless trivia floating around in my head.

    7. Re:10 Highlights for those who haven't seen it by Mushdot · · Score: 1

      It's funny you mention psychohistory. I just watched the finale at a friends house and on the way home I was thinking I quite liked the way that everyones destiny had been shaped in a way, but where had I heard that before? The Foundation series popped in my head just as I sat down to read this. I quite enjoyed the finale. I think it tied up enough of the loose ends for me to be satisfied, and probably was done as well as it could be considering how in my opinion, the last series had really started to unravel.

      On another note, I just put the telly on and there was a wildlife documentary on Africa. I really really really did want to see them come across a burnt out raptor and Tigh staggering around with a bottle of moonshine calling everything a frakking toaster :-)

    8. Re:10 Highlights for those who haven't seen it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doctor Who doesn't hold a towel.
      He was wearing a bath gown for the 2005 Christmas Special though.

    9. Re:10 Highlights for those who haven't seen it by neutralstone · · Score: 1

      12. Bill Adama finally returning to his first love: teaching calculus.

    10. Re:10 Highlights for those who haven't seen it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arthur Dent

    11. Re:10 Highlights for those who haven't seen it by Walkingshark · · Score: 1

      Adama punching Baltar in the face for about five minutes straight.

      That was my favorite part of the first hour.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    12. Re:10 Highlights for those who haven't seen it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eunice! Great reference!

    13. Re:10 Highlights for those who haven't seen it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What about the part when the Chief arrives in Scotland only to find it overrun by Daleks, and his last words before they exterminate him are.. Oh frak! And I thought I was a toaster!

    14. Re:10 Highlights for those who haven't seen it by hughk · · Score: 1

      ..and complaining about the absence of a nice cup of tea.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    15. Re:10 Highlights for those who haven't seen it by porges · · Score: 1

      Speaking as one of the people who gets #7: thanks. I think of "Soap" every time I see Cottle.

  20. Loved almost everything but the shaky camera work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I loved BSG almost entirely, though especially during the first two seasons the show had some lows, but one thing that I always will hate no matter what stupid justification is given for its adoption is the shaky camera action. It doesn't give any sensation of deeper reality or what else. Whoever says it emulates our head movements when we look at a scene is an idiot who knows nothing about the way our neck muscles damp the oscillations to offer a more steady sight.
    Parkinson cameras are a stupid craze of the early 00's, with no actual usefulness other than doing something for the sake of being different, surely not better, so please stop using them. Thanks.

    [/rant]

  21. This has all happened before... by LaminatorX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I liked how the end of the new BSG came back around to the opening line of the intro from the old BSG:

    "There are those who believe that life here began out there, far across the universe, with tribes of humans who may have been the forefathers of the Egyptians, or the Toltecs, or the Mayans..."

    1. Re:This has all happened before... by robvs68 · · Score: 1

      LaminatorX wrote: I liked how the end of the new BSG came back around to the opening line of the intro from the old BSG:
      "There are those who believe that life here began out there, far across the universe, with tribes of humans who may have been the forefathers of the Egyptians, or the Toltecs, or the Mayans..."


      ... and how it was subtly accented by the original's theme song as the ships headed toward the sun.

  22. "B" Ark Galactica by EEBaum · · Score: 5, Funny

    I couldn't help but see the parallels to the "B" Ark. Heck, there was even a bathtub on the bridge!

    --
    -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
    1. Re:"B" Ark Galactica by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      ROFL, bravo! Jynnan Tonnyx for everyone!

  23. The ending in a nutshell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    God did it

  24. Where now to turn for your self-loathing fix? by BemoanAndMoan · · Score: 1

    Lurching from pure melodrama to plain old post-apocalyptic drudgery, I watched for a) the hot Cylons and b) the all too rare space booms. While I usually like Ronald Moore's work, there was so much self-indulgent self-pity and self-loathing for anything but "Tivo on, fast-forward engaged".

    And any writer who has to turn to Deus Ex Machina to resolve a story should be spanked severely. Of course the writing was on the walls and in the context of the story from the beginning, but why must it always be God who solves the really big problems? I would have preferred to have seen the external influence turn out to be internalized somehow, even perhaps some new, third factor introduced near the end, like a "gestalt intelligence formed over the cycles between humans and Cylons" that was fighting for its own survival as well. At least that's honest and 'real', and ultimately resolved without resorting to cosmic super-powers.

    In the end the message is that we can't survive without God's intervention, which is as dreary a message as I've ever seen in any medium ... and only means it's his fault anyway and we just sat through four seasons of His crappy technical support.

    --

    Anybody who believes in Intelligent Design should stay out of the medical profession.

  25. More than 2.4 million people by juanjux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    2.4 million people tuned in for the finale.

    And probably five times that figure downloaded the torrent outside the USA. I wish a system to pay for the chapters outside USA, at a reasonable price and with good subtitules were in place; I would use it.

    1. Re:More than 2.4 million people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just outside the US -- some of us don't have cable and sites like Hulu are delaying the final episodes by two weeks. So torrent it is! I'm not willing to pay, but I would have watched an ad-supported feed had it been available.

    2. Re:More than 2.4 million people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was someone on the Sci-fi (syfy?) forums who lived in Japan that mentioned he got the last episode from iTunes.

    3. Re:More than 2.4 million people by williamhb · · Score: 1

      2.4 million people tuned in for the finale.

      Makes the "one of the most popular science fiction shows in recent history" from the summary questionable. IIRC, Doctor Who, Survivors, Primeval, and even Torchwood trounced that figure by a good margin in the UK. Perhaps one of the most popular US shows, but it seems US audiences just aren't that into science fiction.

    4. Re:More than 2.4 million people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am one of those that torrented it, I'll admit it (as a true AC).

      It's shown on BSkyB (satTV) here in the UK.
      I hate BSkyB; they poach all the good stuff from public TV and the UK will be the 51st US state before I fork over any money to BSkyB.

    5. Re:More than 2.4 million people by hughk · · Score: 1

      All that is interesting are the Nielsen ratings - live US viewers and Friday evening has a deserved reputation for being the graveyard of television series. If you record it (TiVO or whatever) it doesn't count, nor does Hulu.

      Syndication sales happen too far downstream to save a show, remember TOS.

      To be fair legit downloads with embedded US network style advertising wouldn't be interesting - the ads are too annoying and everyone would want to skip. As far as illegal downloads are concerned, the target group for BSG are amongst the worst offenders (opportunity plus inclination), again it doesn't count.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    6. Re:More than 2.4 million people by hughk · · Score: 1

      Perhaps one of the most popular US shows, but it seems US audiences just aren't that into science fiction.

      US audiences tend not to have patience for story-arcs, partly because the networks like to move episodes around so it gets hard to find them or plan your week around them. Lastly, the quantity of advertising on US shows has got to the point where you have to be a masochist to view anything live.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    7. Re:More than 2.4 million people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention those that downloaded the episode within the US. Some of us just don't have access to a TV all the time.

  26. cop out ending by stim · · Score: 1

    I have been lurking several discussions on the final and I have absolutely fell in love with this outrage over being unable to "believe" a supernatural force was driving things. The show was about robots who became human and flew around in spaceships at faster than light speeds. Protip: Nothing in the show was believable.

    --
    Browse at -1 to keep an eye out for abuses.
  27. I didn't like the ending by gsn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I dislike using god and a hokey religion as an explanation for anything. I couldn't stand the last few episodes with Baltar babbling on about his angels. The show has always had a religious theme but I held out for a reasonable rational explanation of the head characters (something to do with cylon projection) and Kara.

    Instead pooft she magically disappears into thin air, after magically entering the coordinates of a single magic planet in all of space from a magic song that her magically disappearing dad taught her when she was young and that Hera magically happens to know as well. How? What? Why?

    I disliked the get rid of all our technology and live like the natives bit. Both the god explanation and the luddite attitude seem to me to be a diservice to many science fiction fans who overwhelmingly like science and technology and reject hokey explanations for things like flying spaghetti monsters. Seriously, what happens the next time someone needs to get a tooth pulled now that all their technology is gone.

    I disliked the Cavil suicide bit because it seemed out of character along with actually listening to Baltar's stupid little speech on coexistence and angels. I'd like Boomer's redemption to not have been followed with her getting shot in the gut again. I didn't need to see Adama puking.

    And finally, Tyrol is an idiot for not realizing that killing Cally was the nicest thing Tory or anyone else in the entire fleet did for him.

    --
    Reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled.
    1. Re:I didn't like the ending by stonedcat · · Score: 0

      Cavil's suicide was in all likelihood a control issue.
      He was obsessive about having control of everything and when it became clear to him that he no longer
      had any control and that he was going to die for sure, he wanted to make sure it was on his terms.

      --
      You can't take the sky from me.
    2. Re:I didn't like the ending by sonicmerlin · · Score: 1

      Dean Stockwell asked Moore to put in the suicide scene, as he felt that Cavil was such a hardcore realist that he would know when the jig was up, and prefer to go out on his own terms rather than be killed by the enemy. With Boomer, I agree at how stupid the result of her redemption was. Apparently Moore and co. feel that revenge and murder are A-ok in a race that's supposed to 'break the cycle'. And with Cally, she cheated on Tyrol and hid the fact that her son wasn't his. He didn't even like her, as he said so many times himself. Not to mention she was about to expose the 4 Cylons. I would have thought Tyrol would be appreciative. But instead he commits murder, and no one seems to mind that a long valued member of the BSG crew was murdered in cold blood right in front of their eyes.

  28. subtlety schmutlety by CarpetShark · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1. Less talk and more subtlety. This means very little or no explicit dialog, no in-your-face pictures of dancing robots (but maybe Baltar and Six in front of an electronics store),

    Serious question: what the hell for? What do you gain from subtlety? A bit of smugness that you "worked out" the oh-so-subtle meaning? The right to ignore the show's message, and still claim to enjoy the show because you "didn't see it that way"?

    It's popular lately for all messages in media to be subtle, but that's just a cop-out so it can be mass-sold to everyone, and the many will buy it. It doesn't actually add value. If anything, it dilutes it.

    1. Re:subtlety schmutlety by Serious+Callers+Only · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Serious question: what the hell for? What do you gain from subtlety?

      The world around us is subtle, shades of grey, not black and white. Lack of subtlety implies lack of understanding or, worse, wilful ignorance. Never good when you're trying to suspend disbelief as a viewer.

      It's popular lately for all messages in media to be subtle, but that's just a cop-out so it can be mass-sold to everyone

      Please, I'd like an example so that we know what you're talking about, because this sounds like bullshit demagogy otherwise - 'a cop-out so it can be mass-sold', WTF? Since when has subtlety made things more mainstream? How is it more prevalent than the manichaeism so popular over the last decade in 'the civilised world' as our politicians like to call it?

      Art and entertainment are not solely there to 'add value' (whatever that means), they are a mode of communication, and a method of provoking emotions and thoughts in the viewer. Adding subtlety makes characters and situations portrayed more convincing, engaging and involving.

      Battlestar Galactica had some promising starting assumptions and some poetic and moving moments, but having watched the first few series, it rarely rose above the level of soap opera (set in space), precisely because the script-writers felt it necessary to telegraph lots of the plot again and again, to introduce meaningless sub-plots (note needless complication is not subtlety) that were never tied up, and generally to beat the viewer around the head with what was happening, rather than leaving some things mysterious, and allowing ideas and characters room to breathe.

      It was best when really pushing conflicts inherent in our society like freedom vs rights, the religious vs the secular in public life and military force vs political force. Sometimes that was let down by poor scripting, and sometimes by slightly hammy plot-lines. The best thing about it in my opinion was the oh-so-camp Gaius Baltar, who knew what the score was and played up to the hammy scripts he was handed. At times it did deal with genuinely interesting ideas in a genuinely challenging manner (terrorism for one), and yet that was betrayed by the insistence on cheap emotional shots (But you're a beautiful woman! But you're a cylon! But you're my father!), torture and sex, just to spice it up a little.

      It had the feel of being written by huge teams of writers (i.e. more than two), and that was a shame, as some material was really promising, and I love thoughtful sci-fi.

    2. Re:subtlety schmutlety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      subtle doesn't have to be hard to figure out, nor does it result in a watered down show (in fact I'd argue the opposite, dumbing down the show by just saying "here's what we mean, we don't want you to have to think" will allow it to appeal to more people.)

      The 10 minutes of "boo technology bad look japan has robots now!" at the end of the show is a perfect example. It was the writers beating the viewers over the head with a message. It was tacky.

    3. Re:subtlety schmutlety by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      I prefer the entertainment to be pitched where I can understand it. Not where 17 people out of 3 million understand it.

      And I think that they either

      a) Mocked themselves for stating the obvious (Cavel to the black cylon)
      b) Didn't state the obvious.

      Of course one question is... what good is the watchman song to current earth people? but...

      a) Loved the fact they finally gave a reason why cylons and others would hear that song in some far off non-earth reality (guess we should have seen there would be a current day tie but I didn't until it came on the radio).
      b) Are the cylons and the humans the joker and the thief? Or is "god" and "god2" using the humans to try and find a way out of here?
      c) Did ron go shallow and stop after a few lines of the song- or are the rest of the lyrics buried in other parts of the show?

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    4. Re:subtlety schmutlety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The right to ignore the show's message, and still claim to enjoy the show because you "didn't see it that way"?

      Yes, that's the beauty of subtlety. Layers upon layers can be thought about, explored, connected, etc. Instead of just sitting there being told what to think and what things mean.

    5. Re:subtlety schmutlety by Gallamine · · Score: 1

      I think the poster, and myself included, found the 30 second moral message at the end to be very forced. Next time I watch the end, I think I'll stop it as the camera pans away from Adama and Rosalyn's grave. Oh great ... now I've gotta go grab some tissues *sob*

      --
      RobotBox - Robot projects from around the world
    6. Re:subtlety schmutlety by furby076 · · Score: 1

      Lack of subtlety implies lack of understanding or, worse, wilful ignorance

      No it doesn't and I would challenge you to provide three credible research papers which state lack of subtlety implies lack of understanding. Many people fail at subtlety, which is a skill unto itself, and completely understand the situation at hand. Politicians are typically great at subtlety, but there are many politicians who have no idea what they are talking about. On the converse there are many intellectuals who are great at understanding situations but couldn't pass off a silent fart in a subtle manner let alone a complex situation.

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
    7. Re:subtlety schmutlety by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      The world around us is subtle, shades of grey, not black and white.

      Sometimes. And sometimes the world around us is as unsubtle as a lightning strike, a tsunami, or an asteroid impact.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  29. Clarke's Third Law by Nebulious · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."

    The 'higher power' in Battlestar is probably not a divine entity, but a remnant of the ancient society of Kobal that wants to see humanity survive. This chessmaster knew what it was doing though, so it's origin and motives are never explicitly stated.

    1. Re:Clarke's Third Law by anagama · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that is a rationalization. Besides, if the 12 colonies had been so smart as to figure out faster than light travel, I'd imagine they'd have independently come up with Clarke's Third Law, and rather than chuck everything and doom themselves to a grueling existence poking the earth and animals with sharp sticks, would have decided to learn about the higher technologyl

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    2. Re:Clarke's Third Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would explain why "you know he hates that name"...would be great to see that idea picked up in Caprica.

    3. Re:Clarke's Third Law by ardor · · Score: 1

      Indeed. In fact, this is the single biggest problem with luddite attitude. After reverting to a hunter-gatherer existence, the romantic view of a simple life with mother nature dissipates, and gives way to the utter horrors of this lifestyle. No medicine, no energy, no tools, no houses, high mortality rate etc.

      They may have been weary of high-tech after being surrounded by it for five years, but now they are stuck with NO tech at all, for the rest of their lives.

      --
      This sig does not contain any SCO code.
    4. Re:Clarke's Third Law by ricree · · Score: 1

      That's what I figured. My take on it is that they're related to the Lords of Kobol, and since they started off the whole cycle by creating humanity they tried to work behind the scenes to end it peacefully.

    5. Re:Clarke's Third Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly.... In fact right at the end baltar daemon hints at this when he says "he doesn't like to be called that" after 6 refers to god.

      Plenty of hints that there is more at work:

      - Starbuck, disappears/dies and comes back just fine w/o any memory of being gone.
      - The new series Caprica is about development of cylons AND resurrection of >humans. And all this tech is at least 3K years old , did it really just disappear after the first cylon war at Cobal?
      - Who nuked the cylon earth and where did that weird virus come from? Never got any explanation of that one did we?

      BSG has been focused on the journey from the colonies to 'new' earth. There's a lot of room there for more stories to be told.

    6. Re:Clarke's Third Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was hoping to see, at some point in the series, a nod to the original series' Ship of Lights. This would have at least left that possibility more open...

    7. Re:Clarke's Third Law by tyrione · · Score: 1

      "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." The 'higher power' in Battlestar is probably not a divine entity, but a remnant of the ancient society of Kobal that wants to see humanity survive. This chessmaster knew what it was doing though, so it's origin and motives are never explicitly stated.

      Clark may seem to get credit, but many far prior espoused this statement far more completely but seem to be overlooked. Nothing new.

    8. Re:Clarke's Third Law by sonicmerlin · · Score: 1

      He said *it* doesn't like that name. IT IT IT IT! Stop filling your brain with false memories that satisfy your rationalizations.

  30. No tech? by ardor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lee's conclusion made no sense. The situation was already good for another try. I mean, Cylons and Humans were at peace, so rebuilding a Human-Cylon civilization was a possibility. The rebel cylons and the humans were truly allied, and even the Centurions weren't enemies anymore. They had first-hand knowledge of what happens when they don't treat artificial lifeforms as equals AND a chance at rebuilding a hybrid civilization from scratch, therefore breaking the cycle of death. (Honestly, with this shiny advanced Cylon tech and the sturdy, tough Colonial tech, that would have been one hell of a civilization.)

    Instead, they threw it all away, and opted to become cavemen. This is the equivalent of running away from the problem. The final minutes demonstrated this. With all Colonial and Cylon knowledge lost, WE are now doomed to repeat these mistakes, since the problem still is unresolved. The only true way of breaking the cycle is for society to acknowledge that artificial lifeforms are not of lesser status.

    --
    This sig does not contain any SCO code.
    1. Re:No tech? by Cookie+Monster+9.81 · · Score: 1

      The only true way of breaking the cycle is for society to acknowledge that artificial lifeforms are not of lesser status.

      Yeah, I'd expect a toaster lover to say something like that.

    2. Re:No tech? by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      Actually, it does make sense because all that technology has brought only one thing: untold suffering on both sides.

      Yes, what Lee Adama wanted doesn't make sense by our modern standards, but makes sense by his standards for two reasons: 1) he didn't want whatever enemy Cylons remaining to find the spaceships and 2) he wanted to live the ideal of a simpler life.

    3. Re:No tech? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      The only true way of breaking the cycle is for society to acknowledge that artificial lifeforms are not of lesser status.

      Either that, or just make sure they're under very strict control.

      But yes, I agree, losing the knowledge definitely doesn't seem a like a solution. Keeping the technology in check, no over-relying on it, etc. may be great ideas, but destroying the knowledge isn't.

    4. Re:No tech? by ardor · · Score: 1

      Well, dismantle the ships then. That would have been a very good idea anyway, since they surely contain tons of refined material. (Tylium!) They could have prepared themselves, reinforced their new colony, and arm it to the teeth in case Cavil wants to say Hi. The new earth was far away from the cylon colony, so it would have taken them a good while to comb through all the habitable planets.

      And, if Lee wants a simpler life, then *he* should have chosen it for *himself*, not for everybody.

      --
      This sig does not contain any SCO code.
    5. Re:No tech? by S-100 · · Score: 1

      Hey, it's SciFi, so they floated a new idea. At the thought of setting up yet another city, with all of the infrastructure, laws, political baggage and everything else, Lee came up with a chance to try something novel. Look how our own lives could be improved if we could "roll back the clock" on certain aspects of civilization. Sure, "gun control" is a good idea in principle, but only if everyone is equally disarmed. Even when the colonies flew as a "rag tag" fleet of ships they maintained strong ties to their destroyed home worlds. Building new cities based on those obsolete affinities would quickly lead to conflict, competition and maybe war.

      Here was, for the first time, the chance to successfully put the genie back in the bottle.

    6. Re:No tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey dude, my toaster makes the best toasts in the universe.

      Be respectful or else...

    7. Re:No tech? by ardor · · Score: 1

      The idea is hardly new; its the whole luddite principle.

      But as you said, its SciFi, so lets float another idea. Create a combineed Human/Cylon civilization (something which never happened before, not in Kobol, not on the old Earth, not on the Colonies), and let the two merge, to become a post-human civilization.

      --
      This sig does not contain any SCO code.
    8. Re:No tech? by Jbain · · Score: 1

      And, if Lee wants a simpler life, then *he* should have chosen it for *himself*, not for everybody.

      You're forgetting that they proposed the idea to everyone else and they all agreed. Lee didn't /force/ anyone.

    9. Re:No tech? by jjohnson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They didn't opt to become cavemen, they opted to become pastoralists, akin to Quakers. With their knowledge they could easily recreate a relatively stable and safe pre-industrial civilization--they kept maps and a few raptors, and things like binoculars. They weren't planning on abandoning language, they were planning on teaching the locals to speak.

      Keep in mind that their technological civilization was at its ragged end. The ships were falling apart--they planned to cannibalize Galactica to keep other ships running. And after five years living a cramped, always-near-death-from-technology life, I imagine a quiet, pastoral life seemed a lot more appealing to them than it would to you or I.

      And at bottom was the awareness that their technologically empowered lifestyle kept leading to the same cycle of destructive war that catapulted them back there anyway. The idea was to give themselves another chance at the cycle, to hopefully mature spiritually this time.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    10. Re:No tech? by ardor · · Score: 1

      And this is very hard to buy. We mostly saw the Colonial military, not the civilians. These may want to continue their old life as much as possible. Over 40000 people agreeing 100% on an idea as radical as reverting to the stone age is implausible. At least a few of them should have a different opinion. The only logical conclusion would have been a split; pro-tech and anti-tech. Both go their separate ways. There is room for both. Its a big planet, after all.

      --
      This sig does not contain any SCO code.
    11. Re:No tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. I had a feeling the ending would contain something profoundly stupid like this. The decision made no sense and yet we are supposed to lap it up as a meaningful, illuminating choice by Lee to "start over". As you said, it is actually starting over from scratch which will doom humanity to repeat the mistakes, not rebuilding civilization with all the lessons learned from the war.

      Truly stupid. I liked Galactica 2003, it was entertaining, but I always knew it wasn't a smart, cerebral series.

    12. Re:No tech? by khallow · · Score: 1

      Actually, it does make sense because all that technology has brought only one thing: untold suffering on both sides.

      And Lee Adama's suggestion resulted in 150,000 years of untold suffering. Even if abandoning technology were the right decision, flying the colonial ships into the Sun is absolutely reprehensible. Those ships could have been used to store valuable messages and knowledge (or at the least, the story) for the far future. Say stick them in the stable Lagrange points of Jupiter or somewhere out in the Oort clouds.

      Yes, what Lee Adama wanted doesn't make sense by our modern standards, but makes sense by his standards for two reasons: 1) he didn't want whatever enemy Cylons remaining to find the spaceships and 2) he wanted to live the ideal of a simpler life.

      1) Ok, I buy that that's a problem. Stick them out in the Oort clouds then or jump them to another star. Hell, given some to the machine Cylons, They could have used the manufacturing ships, I bet. 2) Given that every one of those colonies ceased to exist, it sounds like Adama or one of his near descendants discovered the other side of the "simpler" life.

    13. Re:No tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see... they've had two examples in the last few thousand years of technology blowing up in their faces. 100B+ died 4 years ago due to tech and they have spent the last four years living on recycled alge in small steel boxes.

      Oh... also new caprica turned out really swell.

      Putting myself in their position I'd probably say ef-it too.

    14. Re:No tech? by ucblockhead · · Score: 3, Insightful

      With no technological infrastructure to maintain them, those ships would have fallen apart and become useless within a decade or so. I think a lot of people don't realize how much of the technological infrastructure that was "thrown away" required a large technological civilization to maintain it.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    15. Re:No tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lee's conclusion puts a helluva lot of faith in giving "only the best of us" to the new humans. Lee has an essentially optimistic idea. He thinks that there is so much wrong with the humans from the colonies that there's no way they'll do it right this time. Instead, Lee thinks that by carefully passing on only the "best qualities" of the old humans to the new human race the new humans will have a better shot at not screwing things up when it is their turn.

      In other words it is a very in-character moment. He's an idealistic dreamer. He also assumes that nobody will try and cheat his plan. We don't know what happens aBSG (after Battle Star Galactica) perhaps there is a whole history of people cheating Lee's plan but ultimately falling back to hunter-gatherer life.

      It was 150,000 years ago. A great deal could have happened. Cities built and destroyed. Entire Egyptian style civilizations rising and falling 15 times over leaving only the barest traces of stone monuments that other civilizations tore down or built on top of.

      I found the whole thing as plausible an ending as I found the idea of Cylons and 12 colonies searching for Earth. It was a fantasy after all...

    16. Re:No tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With no technological infrastructure to maintain them, those ships would have fallen apart and become useless within a decade or so. I think a lot of people don't realize how much of the technological infrastructure that was "thrown away" required a large technological civilization to maintain it.

      So you gear down. Use the high tech to establish a lower tech industrial base. Standard Alien Space Bat Operating Procedure.

    17. Re:No tech? by khallow · · Score: 1

      So what? Suppose we realize that one of the smaller trojan asteroids is actually a dead, 150,000 year old ship? I think that would be a beneficial kick in the pants for humanity on Earth.

    18. Re:No tech? by S-100 · · Score: 1

      Yes, going back to the "old days" is not a new concept, but actually being able to pull it off is.

    19. Re:No tech? by chromatic · · Score: 1

      And after five years living a cramped, always-near-death-from-technology life, I imagine a quiet, pastoral life seemed a lot more appealing to them than it would to you or I.

      I prefer the explanation that they took stupid pills to excise all memories of New Caprica before voting, thus using up all of their remaining medical supplies.

    20. Re:No tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But as you said, its SciFi, so lets float another idea. Create a combineed Human/Cylon civilization (something which never happened before, not in Kobol, not on the old Earth, not on the Colonies), and let the two merge, to become a post-human civilization.

      I've seen that. It was called 'Matrix Revolutions' and I gotta say that this was much more satisfying.

    21. Re:No tech? by khallow · · Score: 1

      Let's see... they've had two examples in the last few thousand years of technology blowing up in their faces. 100B+ died 4 years ago due to tech and they have spent the last four years living on recycled alge in small steel boxes.

      And? They are alive because of technology. Those 100+ billion people are dead because of overconfidence and stupidity.

    22. Re:No tech? by deadboy2000 · · Score: 1

      Just because they made this decision as a group doesn't mean that there were no dissenters. Those who wanted to keep all of the tech were a minority who, we assume, did not end up affecting the outcome in a significant way.

    23. Re:No tech? by khallow · · Score: 1

      The idea was to give themselves another chance at the cycle, to hopefully mature spiritually this time.

      How does a civilization "mature spiritually"? Especially one that turns its back on the its knowledge and experience. I think that is a non sequitur. Individual people can mature. But spiritual maturity is not hereditary.

    24. Re:No tech? by Walkingshark · · Score: 1

      Exactly. They had finally learned the lessons about not enslaving machines, etc and then decided that passing that lesson (and all of the thousands of years of hard fought lessons learned from their ancestors) was too much trouble, and that instead they'd just give up and punt the problem down a few hundred generations.

      Ultimately, it leaves you wondering: Why do I even care that these people survived? There is already another planet full of humans hanging out there in space, and God can create Kara Thraces and Vipers from scratch out of pure vaccum, so even if they'd all died it wouldn't have mattered, it would have just had Kara Thrace crap out another viper and fly it back to the newly recreated ragtag fleet to try again.

      Including the magical pigeon Starbuck ruins the entire show and makes it unwatchable.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    25. Re:No tech? by ardor · · Score: 1

      Matrix Revolutions wasn't posthuman. To be honest, I'm not sure what Matrix Revolution was supposed to be.

      A civilization where there are all sorts of mixes between baseline human, cyborgs, and purely artificial intelligences is a transhuman one. A civilization where baseline humans are a minority would be a posthuman one.

      --
      This sig does not contain any SCO code.
    26. Re:No tech? by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      I think the idea was that tossing the higher technology gave them a chance at a different, more pastoral lifestyle. It doesn't necessarily free them the cycle, but it offers an opportunity that retaining their technology wouldn't.

      I'm not saying it's good philosophy or sociology, but that was the idea, and it's not totally crazy. There are lots of communities that live more steady-state, non-technology-driven lives: Quakers, Amish, Hutterites, Mennonites, various hippie communes still holding out from the sixties, even some environmentalists urging scaling back our drive to industrialize everything in unsustainable ways.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    27. Re:No tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not useless. Derelicts. Ruins.

      Ruins are far from useless.

    28. Re:No tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So these people are survivors of a holocaust that came out of their technology. If they'd found Earth I and everything was fine, they probably would have wanted to keep their technology. Finding that it was an irradiated dustball probably drove home that they really were doomed by some cosmic plan (if you buy the premise of the entire series) to do it all over again. Assuming you think about it from that point of view, a return to the garden of Eden is voluntarily surrendering the bad knowledge that led to the fall. I'm not surprised that no one on Slashdot likes that message, but that was the message - keeping rotary telephones didn't protect them in the end, only a complete abandonment of their technology was the answer... Ted Kaczinsky would be proud.

      The last few shots are really worth thinking about a little more. Ron Moore is not being exploitive there. I think after 4 years of writing a show about killer robots that was probably 20 seconds worth doing. The current state of robotics is somthing we really should be thinking about more, because we really are getting to what could be a dangerous point in our development. I was an IT guy who went back and got an EE degree over the last few years (I wanted to do renewable energy but since that's a "solved problem" from the point of view of the jackasses at my alma mater, I ended up working on robotics stuff to be able to do work in a lab.) I find the things that me and some undergrads could do for less than $10k and with not a huge amount of knowledge to be... a little alarming. Between player/stage and openCV, this is getting to be like virus writing kits, but with real world consequences... you don't have to be good when you're standing on the shoulders of giants.

    29. Re:No tech? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Still, they could at least have grounded them and stripped them for parts. Who doesn't want a water filtration system when starting up on some strange new planet? It just seemed like a bad plot device to have the Earth ending make more sense. I didn't buy the primitivist philosophy they all suddenly adopted.

    30. Re:No tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such a simplistic view of the world. Drop all your technology and move into the woods and see how long you survive. Your first fungal infection will have you running into town to get some medicine. Its fucking stupid as hell to think that everyone would just slough off all their technology, medical systems, and so on to go live in the woods. It might seem like people would do that but find me 38K city folk that would drop everything and move away to the nowhere with nothing. Bullshit, it would never happen.

    31. Re:No tech? by ardor · · Score: 1

      "So these people are survivors of a holocaust that came out of their technology."

      This is wrong. It came out of their decadence and arrogance. They treated cylons like lowly slaves, and not as equals. This is the very reason why all these genocidal wars happened in the past. In the finale, they finally DID see cylons as equals. This would have been a much better ending: for the first time in history, humans and cylons rebuild a civilization *together*.

      --
      This sig does not contain any SCO code.
    32. Re:No tech? by tyrione · · Score: 1

      With no technological infrastructure to maintain them, those ships would have fallen apart and become useless within a decade or so. I think a lot of people don't realize how much of the technological infrastructure that was "thrown away" required a large technological civilization to maintain it.

      You've got to be joking. The Cylon Ship jumped away. Who the hell thought that was rational? The Galactica was broken, but wasn't dead. The systems to repair, create and mine for ores and produce infrastructure were all in the stored computer systems plans and much more. It's a big copout.

    33. Re:No tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds all nice and pretty till no one remembers how to make beer.

      By going Quaker they never really resolve the problems and war that occurred and put themselves in a situation full of famine, disease and mineral deprivation.

    34. Re:No tech? by imgod2u · · Score: 1

      This is the Faustian head-in-the-sand philosophy that's always irritated me. People blame knowledge and technology for the evils of the world. Humans are the source of evils. Whether they're killing each other with spears over who gets the fish or killing each other with guns over who gets rations, they're still the same barbaric species.

      It wasn't technology that caused the death of the Colonies, it was humanity's arrogance; they thought of their artificial creations as lesser beings. Getting rid of technology doesn't solve the problem, it only delays the inevitable. People will strive to create and invent again and all the mistakes will be forgotten.

      The only way to break the Cycle is to learn from past mistakes, not forget them. That means to embrace artificial sentience as equals, not forget they ever existed.

    35. Re:No tech? by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      I think it was a difficult decision but they had no choice. They realized that they only had to choices. To immediately start building cities and recreating their lost civilization or to make a leap of faith and abandon all of the old baggage. The first choice clearly leads to another cycle so they had to go into the wild.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    36. Re:No tech? by rndmtim · · Score: 1

      Actually, that was the point - they did. Hera is a combination of human and cylon, she's the DNA common point of all of us (interestingly also implying that the rest of the other survivor colonies died out). Lee says something about hearts getting left behind as technology races ahead, and I think the point was there was a maturity needed that only a 150,000 more years of evolution could bring about... very Last and First Men (Olaf Stapledon). Both Humans and Cylons (on Earth I) had self destructed through their technology.

    37. Re:No tech? by jafac · · Score: 1

      uh - yeah, the quiet-pastoral-life-charm would wear off after the first winter, and 2/3 of the population is dead from exposure, starvation, disease, and predators. (wolves, lions, sabretooth tigers, T-Rexes, etc.)

      The rest would be like: WTF were we thinking? This sucks!

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  31. It's finally over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank god.

    1. Re:It's finally over? by Nitar · · Score: 1

      Thank god.

      This made me chuckle.

      Your comment (as it was probably intended) could be taken as, "I hated this show, it's finally over."

      The funny thing is, your comment when taken within the context of the finale, sums things up rather nicely.

  32. All those alcoholics gave up liquor? by DebianDog · · Score: 4, Funny

    All those alcoholics gave up liquor? I DON'T THINK SO!!!

    As much as that crew drank. I seriously doubt that "let's live as caveman" would have been seen as a solution. The epic DT's, Adama alone, would have to endure could be a spinoff show.

    1. Re:All those alcoholics gave up liquor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone who repeating the "live as cavemen" line seem to assume that the humans/cylons gave up everything to the point of hunting/gathering. This isn't the case with many people talking about farming, building cabins, etc. Just because they give up spaceships and high technology doesn't lead to the conclusion that they are living like the natives.

      I don't think a spinoff would be realistic. You could make a soap opera out of it, but it wouldn't have the same appeal as the original show.

    2. Re:All those alcoholics gave up liquor? by altronic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, poignant moments are great, but what they didn't show was the other 38,000 people desperately trying to ferment grass, tree bark, prehistoric water buffalo milk....

    3. Re:All those alcoholics gave up liquor? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Good point except alcohol is quite easy to make even with cavemen technology, maybe not the fanciest destilled stuff but mead or wine sure.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re:All those alcoholics gave up liquor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were all so happy, they stopped drinking.

    5. Re:All those alcoholics gave up liquor? by ucblockhead · · Score: 2, Funny

      You don't understand...the true motivation for going native was that they ran out of liquor.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    6. Re:All those alcoholics gave up liquor? by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      I am sure the first crop they plant would be grapes and barley.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    7. Re:All those alcoholics gave up liquor? by khallow · · Score: 1

      That's not the desperate part. Drinking that stuff is the desperate part.

    8. Re:All those alcoholics gave up liquor? by Walkingshark · · Score: 1

      Making liqor was probably the first technology they redeveloped. Well, the handful of them who survived trying to live off the land when all they'd ever known was modern civilization.

      If I had been one of those guys on the tilium ship, when Lee Adama came to me and said "Guess what, now you get to go live like a cave man in the dirt!" I would have shot him in the fucking head.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    9. Re:All those alcoholics gave up liquor? by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1

      Even a Quaker farming community is space-age wizardry compared to humans circa 150k BC. It was farmers who conquered the earth from hunter gatherers.

      So which is it. Did they keep their farming? Then what were they doing for the next 140,000 years? Did they _not_ keep their farming? I'd sooner believe they all stood in a big circle and slit each other's throats.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    10. Re:All those alcoholics gave up liquor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How to make alcohol:

      1)find some sort of fruit/grass, etc.
      2)wait for it to turn into alcohol
      3)?????
      4)Profit!

    11. Re:All those alcoholics gave up liquor? by Scrameustache · · Score: 0, Troll

      All those alcoholics gave up liquor? I DON'T THINK SO!!!

      And the smokers! It was a mystery how they managed to keep cigarettes for so long in the fleet, but once they find a place to grow tobacco... what, all the non-smoking colonials declared america the only smoking continent?

      None of it made any damn sense ;(

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  33. Surely the natives are friendly! by EEBaum · · Score: 4, Funny

    Such a lovely idea, integrating with the native peoples. Surely they will welcome the strange newcomers with open arms, rather than with spears through their intestines.

    --
    -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
    1. Re:Surely the natives are friendly! by sjs132 · · Score: 1

      I think they ripped the ending off of Douglas Adams.... Which book was it where the hair dressers and such are marooned on a planet and mix with the natives to eventually become Arthors great ancestors or some such.... But instead of hair dressers and such, they just marooned all the alchy's. Of course, now it explaines a lot and why I have an uncontrollable urge to drink and throw bottles agains bulkheads, but thats just me.

      Frak... now I've gone and blown it..

      --
      --- Relax, that mass muderer is just trying to reduce our carbon footprint, one fetus at a time...
    2. Re:Surely the natives are friendly! by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

      Actually, in HHGTTG, the natives were dying out - it was the phone sanitizers and marketing executives that became the humans.

      For what it's worth, I see the intervention of the colonists as the cause of the human race beginning to shift from nomadic hunter gatherer to cultivation. This was one of the major milestones in human civilization, and it seems like that's what the BSG writers were going for.

      I too wish that they had explored the possibility that Kara was the daughter of a Daniel, and I also didn't like how much of "Gods plan" worked into this. Still, I supposed it could have sucked more... it could have been Battlestar Galactica 1980 all over again YEuuuch!

      --

      The Digital Sorceress
  34. Fraking epic ending... with a dash of WTF by linebackn · · Score: 1

    Over all I thought it was probably the best ending they could have given it. The "making of" special they had really clarified it as being more "about the character" than anything else. I had been following BSG just because it was one of the few things on TV any more that was even vaguely interesting although I was disgusted how the entire conflict evolved in to some religious BS. (fiction is the appropriate place for religion since religion is all made up, but I cringe at how many people actually take that nonsense literally)

    Anyway, I had actually expected something bigger, or more grand from the "Final five" plot line. But they way that ended really did "fit" this BSG - across life, death, and thousands of years, and it all ends in one big clusterfrak.

    The entire thing about giving up their technology seemed kind of WTF-ish but it was obviously the only way they could make it "fit" in to the time line. I could sort of imagine the people not wanting to do the same thing of creating a city again after the mess on New Caprica, and most of those ships were probably pretty ripe and unlivable after all that time, but not salving tech from them would be crazy.

    More importantly because of this, what they did was end their civilization! What is the point of biological survival if history, technology, forms of government, and other cultural things are not maintained or at least remembered?

    "Repeat to yourself It's just a show, I should really just relax..." :)

    1. Re:Fraking epic ending... with a dash of WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of MST3K, I guess no-one from the colonial fleet had ever seen "Teenage Caveman"
      http://mst3k.wikia.com/wiki/Teenage_Cave_Man

    2. Re:Fraking epic ending... with a dash of WTF by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      This has all happened before, and will all happen again.

      No real need to save anything if its just going to happen again anyway.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  35. Not always by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The god explanation is such a cop out.

    A lot of times when you see something like that, it is a cop out. But not in this case.

    The story - in its entirety - was about something divine moving mankind/cylonkind like pawns. People have destinies in this show, real ones. All throughout.

    So it's not like they just slapped a Deity into the ending to tie things up. Nothing else at that point would have sufficed.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Not always by tyrione · · Score: 3, Informative

      The god explanation is such a cop out.

      A lot of times when you see something like that, it is a cop out. But not in this case.

      The story - in its entirety - was about something divine moving mankind/cylonkind like pawns. People have destinies in this show, real ones. All throughout.

      So it's not like they just slapped a Deity into the ending to tie things up. Nothing else at that point would have sufficed.

      We could get this board as ugly as the SciFi board or we could cite the number of flaws that a certain Digg poster did, but in the end, Moore admitted to making it up as they went.

    2. Re:Not always by anagama · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So it's not like they just slapped a Deity into the ending to tie things up. Nothing else at that point would have sufficed.

      I was dissapointed in the ending but this Slashdot discussion has made me understand it completely. And yes, God was completely necessary:

      • Starbuck is the Harbinger of Death because she leads them to earth, where
      • God intervenes and causes everyone to lose every bit of rationality and common sense.
      • This enables them to make a decision which ensures that all of the Colonists die in short order from malnutrition and disease ...
      • EXCEPT for Hera. Her immune system helps her get through the first couple years.
      • A band of indigenous hunters either decimates Hera's family as they represent a thread to game and forage resources, or adopts her after finding her family dead from hunger and disease.
      • Shortly after puberty, Hera begins pumping out babies with the better immune system.
      • In this way, Hera becomes Mitochondrial Eve.
      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    3. Re:Not always by frieko · · Score: 1

      You don't understand Mitochondrial Eve. According to the theory, many/most of her contemporaries are ALSO our common ancestors.

    4. Re:Not always by anagama · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Well great. With that correction, the ending just reverts to being stupid again. Anyway, I should have added IANAB (biologist) to my original post.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    5. Re:Not always by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      Ah, but did they have to make the big reveal actually be what they thought it was--God, the divine, etc--or could they have been INTERESTING and had this all have a neat sci-fi explanation instead of Ron Moore's half-baked theology?

    6. Re:Not always by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The god explanation is such a cop out.

      A lot of times when you see something like that, it is a cop out. But not in this case.

      The story - in its entirety - was about something divine moving mankind/cylonkind like pawns. People have destinies in this show, real ones. All throughout.

      So it's not like they just slapped a Deity into the ending to tie things up. Nothing else at that point would have sufficed.

      It was a cop out from the beginning.

      There is not good reason for a deity who can bring back the dead, and create vipers out of thin air. To have not provided guidance to both sides so as to have avoided killing 20 billion people.

      I consider the whole cylons/mankind as divine pawns the worst aspect of the story.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    7. Re:Not always by coaxial · · Score: 1

      While the cylon god manipulating the world was a recurring theme, it was never left as being the only explanation. The prophesies were also the history of the 13th tribe. Even if you do hold that the cylon god was manipulating people from afar in very indirect ways, which I think there's a good case for, Ron Moore went off the tracks when he gave the cylon god screen time. That's my problem with it.

      Kara Thrace is an angel? I have to say, I thought they'd pull out the deus ex machina when we saw the crashed viper and the charred corpse. I was hoping it wouldn't happen, but I couldn't come up with another explanation. Head Six and Head Caprica are angels? Frak me.

      And don't even get me started with on the whole "Amish hippies have too much technology, we'll do them one better" ending. As one person put it on scifi.com, "Adama had to pile rocks around Rosilyn because he burned up his fraking shovel in the sun!" RDM wanted the "We're cylons" ending, but had no credible way to bring it about. Two Earths? Frak me.

      I expected more from the guy that killed off Captain Kirk and started out so strong.

      Personally, I kind of like when they found Cylon Earth as the end, which it was going to be if the writer's strike continued a bit longer. A nice downer, like the whole first season.

      All this has already happened and will happen again indeed.

    8. Re:Not always by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I am an atheist and I thought the use and treatment of religion in this storyline was excellent.

      So many science fiction stories are essentially atheist/agnostic and that is really opposed to most of society (tho I read last week that lack of religion was growing- huzzah - tho it won't help me much in the bible belt).

      It had a great ending.

      The *only* thing I would change is that 4 to 5% of humanity probably would have chosen differently. You just never get 100% in real life so that rang false.

      But the writers at least had the characters discuss how odd it was that 100% of folks agreed so I felt that was good enough for me.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    9. Re:Not always by GameMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "The story - in its entirety - was about something divine moving mankind/cylonkind like pawns."

      It was about, _something_ manipulating humans/cylons like pawns but it didn't have to be "God". There are other ways they could have explained it to the audience even if the characters ended up thinking it was a divine presence. One example would be to go back even further (to the "original" Kobol conflict or before) and say that a small group of people, cylons, or hybrids survived and developed advanced tech like true immortality and quantum tech that allowed them to predict future events. This would allow them to manipulate their decendents in a god-like fation without the nebulous cop-out of telling the audience that it was, in fact, "God".

      "People have destinies in this show, real ones. All throughout."

      No, not really. Read the interviews with the Producers (like the one linked to above). They were, literally, making it up as they went along. It was an intentional choice. This is the exact opposite of shows like Babylon 5 where the writer had a full story fleshed out before the show started filming.

      "So it's not like they just slapped a Deity into the ending to tie things up. Nothing else at that point would have sufficed."

      That's exactly what they did. Try reading the above linked interview where they even talk about alternate endings they discussed. Those discussions happened toward the end of the series.

      --

      Rules of Conduct:
      #1 - The DM is always right.
      #2 - If the DM is wrong, see rule #1
    10. Re:Not always by he-sk · · Score: 1

      A band of indigenous hunters either decimates Hera's family as they represent a thread to game and forage resources, or adopts her after finding her family dead from hunger and disease.

      Completely speculative and not supported by anything in the film. The people who are not descended from Hera could have died off hundreds or thousand of years after Hera lived, making her the Mitochondrial Eve.

      In fact, it is believed that exactly this happened on earth: Mitochondrial Eve lived approx. 150000 years ago. About 70000 years ago the entire human population got reduced to about 2000 individuals. It was most likely at this point that other lines from 150000 years ago died out.

      Of course, "God" could have known about that potential extinction event which is why he brought Hera to Earth in the first place. Make sure that enough humans survive.

      --
      Free Manning, jail Obama.
    11. Re:Not always by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Starbucks is the Harbinger of Death

      There's a good sig, right there.

    12. Re:Not always by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe they didn't die from malnutrition and disease...but old age.

      it's possible that the only one that could reproduce (with the locals), after many attempts was Hera.

  36. Better Ending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The colonials don't abandon tech. They build cities. They name them Atlantis, Dwarika, Lemuria, Mu, Eldorado...

  37. Dissenting opinion: Jumped the shark then drowned by guanxi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We re-watched the original miniseries recently; what a good, gripping story. At the time, I liked the show because it was more "Fi" than "Sci": Good characters, interesting plot, sophisticated issues (esp. the political issues). They took advantage of the flexibility of 'Sci' not to provide gee-whiz gizmos and superpowers that are no more meaningful than special effects, but to provide a unique setting that was not possible in real-world setting.

    Re-watch the original mini-series yourself and you can't miss how far the show has come, but in a completely different (and in my mind, wrong) direction. The characters and acting have become extreme and overdramatc. The political issues hang around, but in often they are absurd (how about the politics of ditching all your technology? It was handled by one sentence: 'It's surprising there was no dissension' -- it sure is!). And the show is dominated by the Sci -- mysticism, cylon projections, the final 5, etc etc etc. Booooring. Anyone can make that stuff up as they go along; what does it mean?

    And the conclusion was so poorly thought out that the writers are guilty of dereliction of duty. Returning to the decision to abandon all technology: Perhaps they should recall that our ancestors lived short, brutal lives, and they grew up with the skills to survive in that environment; our heroes have no idea how to hunt a buffalo with a spear, clean it, skin it, and preserve the meat for the winter. Just think of this little inconvenience: No salt, no pepper, no spices; no vitamins! When the first drought -- or the locusts, or neighboring tribe or a pack of baboons -- comes and they run out of food, and half of them die off, it won't seem like such a good idea. When people start dying from simple infections because there are no antibiotics, when women start dying in childbirth, when most children don't survive to adulthood, when the leading killer becomes starvation instead of obesity, they may remember the benefits of technology. Sure, we can close our eyes to all these problems, but couldn't the writers have made an effort to tell a story with some plausibility?

    Like many movies and shows, it seems like the writers ran out of time or funding, and just whipped something together to fulfill their obligation to finish the story. Their audience should demand more.

  38. What would you have done differently? by Jaryn · · Score: 0

    It probably goes without saying -- Spoilers.

    While I was rather disappointed in two of the last 4 episodes (both involving the return of Ellen, first on the basestar with Cavil, and then her return to Galactica) I can see now why that setup was necessary for the finale--I just wish they had plotted it out better.

    Ellen, who we thought was a different, decent person, after resurrection, turns out to be her same old drunken jealous trouble causing self when in sight of Saul. Pure soap opera stuff. And then the subplot with Adama suddenly giving Baltar a bunch of guns just cause he asked for them? Who wrote that? And how every 8 minutes we got to see Adama walking around in the bowels of his broken down ship with the same unhappy grimace-- poor repetitive direction/editing. And I'm sorry, John Hodgman is great-- but cast in that role, in what ought to have been a pretty serious scene-it was hard to watch.

    So, those things, real bad. They all could have been re-written or removed very easily. That's what I would have done differently.

    But the finale? -- Damn near perfect. Action was great-- special effects were amazing, emotionally touching and tear-enducing, -- and yes, thankfully, it WAS about the characters.

    Yes, I know, not everything was answered/ tied down perfectly. But who wants that?

    I loved how, after essentially being bottled up on their ships for 4 or 5 years (with the exception of that chilly gray New Caprica settlement) they finally get to 'an Earth' and find their future wide open. In a way it's paradise, but not-- Roslin still dies, Chief's gonna go off and be a hermit apparently, Anders has become one with the universe, and.. surprisingly Helo DIDN'T DIE. Nothing is set. They're just free. After all that prophecy and pre-destination, things are now much less complicated. Everyone got their own destiny to forge.

    Loose ends don't need tying if everyone is happy to just walk away from them.

    As for Kara - yes, she disappeared and someone complained that it was never explained. Well, sure, it wasn't 'explained', but is there any other explanation? There isn't. She truly was an angel. Someone or some "God" (he doesn't like that name), sent her back to deliver mankind to a new home. That IS what happened.

    I have no problem with that. I'm not a religious person in the slightest, but its weird how sci-fi can be full of aliens and "The Force" but some how the idea of God gets people up in arms. --- See, I -would- have had a problem if they explicitly put ol God up on the screen (oh look, Starbuck's dad was the piano player! and the piano player was God! and/or also Daniel! and/or Bob Dylan!!!??) and explained why each and every step along the way happened as it did. That would be idiotic, almost as idiotic as giving someone a midichlorian scan. (Jar-Jar was bad, but that one line, "His readings are off the chart!" was the moment in the prequels that brought down the original trilogy. Frak.)

    Seriously, life is full of loose ends. You try to tie it all up and explain everything, that would be awful. Instead I got to watch the best couple hours of TV.. ever.

  39. Dartboard Plot Development by MrSteveSD · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seasons one and two were great, but things rapidly started to go down hill after that. It became rapidly apparent that there was no overall plan (like Straczynski had with Babylon 5). They had set up lots of mysteries without first knowing what the resolution would be. If the mysteries were ever solved at all, they were solved in random ways, and they have pretty much admitted as much. A good example of this was the "final 5". By their own admission they picked them randomly, so what was the point of the audience trying to guess who they might be, based on possible clues?

    I find it difficult to watch a show knowing that the writers have no more idea of how things will be resolved than I do. Mysteries can be very compelling, but the fun of a mystery is trying to unravel it yourself, and you clearly can't unravel it if the writers are going to use a dartboard to resolve it. What's the point of getting caught up in a mystery when you know it's a complete mystery to the writers as well?

    Another problem with Galactica has been the masses of pointless filler. A good recent example of that is Baltar's religious Harem. They spent absolutely ages on that plot-line, then dumped it at the last minute. What was the point of it all? How exactly did it advance the plot? A lot of fans I know dumped the series somewhere in Season 3, complaining that it had turned into a soap opera. I know exactly what they mean.

    Whereas in Season 1 and 2 you tended to have strong plots in each episode (blowing up a Cylon fuel depot, or Finding a missing pilot etc) in later seasons things started to become very drawn out. Instead there was more and more focus on relationships and peoples petty problems. That sort of thing is fine in an Alan Bennett play, but this show was fundamentally about people fleeing from killer robots in outer space. When you watch science fiction you expect some degree of excitement. It doesn't necessarily have to be low-brow "laser gun battle" excitement, but endless drawn out episodes with nothing happening are a pretty sorry excuse for science fiction (if not fiction in general).

    1. Re:Dartboard Plot Development by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree. I couldn't miss any episode until end of season. Season 3 had still some nice episodes. Season 4 was Berverly Hills 90210 remix in outer space.

    2. Re:Dartboard Plot Development by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, the first two seasons were the best, and after that I only continued to watch because I had already invested time watching the first two seasons.

      Maybe someone can explain to me, but I still don't see the point of Hera. Those people living on our earth were already 100% DNA compatible, why do we need Hera again? Does she grow up to be the village whore?

      So much time was spent discussing the importance of Hera and she ends up being just another kid?

      Also, an asteroid, hitting a floating raptor (which conveniently had armed its nuclear warheads ), which conveniently jolts the raptor in such a way that the pilot's hand conveniently and precisely hits the "fire" button is so truly ridiculous as a plot device it makes me mad. Is that the best they could come up with?

      In the end, BSG turned out to be another show where the writers wrote episode by episode, without any real idea of where the show was going, and the final episode was their best attempt at tying up a lot of random loose ends.

      Cheers.

    3. Re:Dartboard Plot Development by Macrat · · Score: 1

      Seasons one and two were great, but things rapidly started to go down hill after that. It became rapidly apparent that there was no overall plan (like Straczynski had with Babylon 5).

      You expect a hack writer from Star Trek TNG to have a plan?

    4. Re:Dartboard Plot Development by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      They had set up lots of mysteries without first knowing what the resolution would be. If the mysteries were ever solved at all, they were solved in random ways...

      Mysteries can be very compelling ... but you clearly can't unravel it if the writers are going to use a dartboard to resolve it.

      Another problem ... has been the masses of pointless filler.

      In these respects, the show has been like the show "Lost", but in space. Hey! "Lost in Space" would be a great premise for a show... :-)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    5. Re:Dartboard Plot Development by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you. Season 1 and 2 where fantastic and gripping. When they killed Billy off I then knew something was very wrong and that the writers had just broken the first rule of plot believability. The later episodes never really recovered and the ending shows it. Oh well, I am grateful for the first two seasons and respect the efforts they tried for the show even if it is ultimately unsatisfying.

  40. Any point bothering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I became sick and tired of the endless preaching, layers of hipocrisy within hipocrisy, and "we're oh so human we have so many bad sides" of all the characters. BG became so steeped in religious and political in-fighting that the sci-fi was forgotten, not to mention the third series ran too long. I would actually like to see some space battles, okay? Is America so caught up in politics that it has to make a sci-fi series a poster-child for its anti-terrorism message? All of the characters because so bloody unlikeable, and episodes about pugilism and pointless backstory reigned, making the series an uncontrollable mess.

    And that cover of All Along The Watchtower? Final nail in the coffin.

    1. Re:Any point bothering? by Jaryn · · Score: 0

      So.. 'pugilism' is a problem, but space battles are a-okay.

      What?

      (well it's true, Star Trek was all about the space battles, -- all the plot regarding culture, religion, politics, and back story -- what a waste)

  41. obviously by Digitus1337 · · Score: 3, Funny

    A wizard did it.

    1. Re:obviously by oracleofbargth · · Score: 1

      A wizard did it.

      No, no, no. The writers did it!

    2. Re:obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Snape kills Adama

    3. Re:obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh sure, blame the wizards.

    4. Re:obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A wizard did it.

      Did he put on his wizard's robe and hat?

    5. Re:obviously by Teancum · · Score: 1

      No, he just stood behind the curtain.

      Of course, you are supposed to ignore the man behind the curtain.

  42. Bleah by The+Second+Horseman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thought the first 90 minutes were fine.

    And then they dropped the ball. The end was a little to "Restaurant at the End of the Universe", with populating Earth. I guess the fleet was the 'B' Ark. The supernatural bits with Starbuck and the two "observing" versions of Baltar and Caprica were a little too "Touched By an Angel". Leaving the pair as potential projections / hallucinations would have been better without us seeing them WITHOUT Baltar and Caprica. We've only ever seen them with one of the two as the POV. Seeing them without the actual characters there blows it. And WTF with Starbuck? So she was an "angel"? Or somehow wasn't real but could interact with solid objects? What? Seriously, her as a clone, or the daughter of the "Daniel" model that got resurrected on Earth the first due to some left-over equipment would have been better. Having her new Viper provided by some of the Cylons to try to force the outcome would have been better.

    And who gets their faith vindicated like that? You don't really need faith once that happens. The whole point of faith is sustaining / motivating someone to believe in something they can't prove. It doesn't even have to be religion. Simply believing that the feelings you have for loved ones and friends are reciprocated is an act of faith on your part. For the story, it didn't matter if the supernatural agency existed - if the faith in it drove Baltar, Caprica, Roslin, etc. to do something important at the end, then it's THEM doing it. That really says something more profound than having some actual intervention. Even if you believe in God, belief in the absence of doubt is hardly ennobling. Nor is doing good without the knowledge of evil.

    Ugh, and the very end? Besides blowing the whole POV thing, it was a subtle as a brick to the head. Argh! Horn-playing Japanese robots will come to kill you!

    1. Re:Bleah by ardor · · Score: 1

      One of my favourite scenes in the first 90 minutes was when Galactica jumped right in front of the colony. The Cylon batteries gave that ship one hell of a beating, and it brushed that off easily. Talk about a tough ship.

      And then they RAM Galactica into the colony, easily punching a hole through the colony's hull. On top of that, this ship is still operational and capable of jumping afterwards! Add Galactica's age to that and one cannot help but be amazed at how brilliant this ship is constructed.

      --
      This sig does not contain any SCO code.
    2. Re:Bleah by Sage+Gaspar · · Score: 1

      Starbuck was resurrected. Think Jesus. She was sent back with a purpose that she did not realize until she made the jump and they finally got to new Earth, then she got ascended.

      Not to say I don't think it's crappy as a storyline but within the fictional universe if you buy "god did it", it's all pretty much explained.

    3. Re:Bleah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole point of having faith is that one day it will become reality and that from that day on one no longer needs to have faith, because that which one believe would become reality has become reality.

      Some (religious) terms explained:

      Hope is a wish that a reality of things not (yet) observed might become reality observed.

      Faith is the assured guaranty, based on facts that can be observed, that a reality of things not (yet) directly observed will one day become reality observed.

      A belief is an opinion, based on existing knowledge, honest experience, truthful observation, and realistic expectations, about the reality of things observed or to be observed.

      A superstition is an opinion about the reality of things based on poor anecdotal evidence and unrealistic expectations about the reality of things observed.

    4. Re:Bleah by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1

      Agreed. My comment on it to a friend was, "I have no problem with religion in my science fiction. It's been a powerful force in human history from day one, I don't see it changing anytime soon. But faith drives _people_, not plot. If you actually make a script which has God... oh _I'm_ sorry, he doesn't like to be called that... just reaching in and conjuring songs, characters, ships, species, whole fucking planets out of thin air, then you might as well just quit and start writing the next Left Behind novel."

      --
      Dyolf Knip
  43. Yes, always. by khasim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Given that God is all powerful and all knowing, it is ALWAYS a cop out to write him into a script.

    People have destinies in this show, real ones.

    Which is nothing more than a cop out saying that the bad script is not really a bad script. It's a good script about God.

    Why would God have NEEDED or WANTED to have the characters act like that? Particularly when there must be a near infinite number of options available to an all knowing and all powerful God.

    It's a cop out. That's all.

    1. Re:Yes, always. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that the term "god" can be applied to anyone with more power then others. Anyone or anything that has power over me is a god to me.

      The only distinction here is that God (with capital-G) has no-one more powerful above him: The regression stops with him: God is without a god. (Is God an atheist?)

      The terms "all powerful", "all knowing", and similar, as used in nearly all religions should not be interpreted as absolute terms, but as relative terms.

      God in only all powerful in the sense that he has the power to reach any goal he sets for himself, which is a whole lot less then but God is also very limited: He still has to obey the laws of mathematics, physics, etc.

      What does the term "natural" even really mean? What if everything we know, us included, is created? If life is the result of the conscious action by an intelligence? What does "natural" mean if life is just really advanced technology?

      Try to give a consistent definition of the term "supernatural" which does not imply that it does not exist...

    2. Re:Yes, always. by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's kind of the point. God gave people the ability to make decisions, and our use of that ability is not under his control. He may have a vision for where he wants us to go, but he absolutely doesn't bring us there, to the contrary he tests/tempts/misleads at every turn. I think he acts only against our total self-annihilation (he did create us), but he never forces anyone. Introduction of God, I don't think it's a cop out in this instance, because:

      First, the original BSG pulled the God card way early, and way more deliberately. It's always been part of the story. The cylons used to be led by Lucifer! I have been waiting for the God card to get pulled for quite some time, but it became clear only in the past few episodes that it would be played at the very end. I think the use of the God card in the re-imagined series is better and less preachy than the original. I like this God better, even if it's a blatant rip of the Tolkien God.

      Second, it's been alluded to for several seasons that there's something more going on than cylons v. humans. They could have pulled a "God did it" or they could have pulled "Aliens did it", but they had to answer the plot element. I won't lie and say I believe they always had a clear idea of whether this force had any strong motivation, but it's clear that there was something out there, something not subject to the random "humanity" that we saw throughout.

      Finally, they made it quite clear that the choices made were entirely in the hands of the humans. God, his agents, etc. were fanning the flames perhaps, but all human elements had free will. This was most blantantly demonstrated with Baltar and his head Six, but it's been there all along with every other character. This is the "humanity" element the show was primarily about. God is out there ensuring that we carry on, reacting, but not forcing.

      I think his lack of control is demonstrated in the last 5 minutes of the show very well. Our favorite angels/demons are walking through present day Earth, with a dialog that runs parallel to "All Along the Watchtower", and as the cold wind starts to blow, we see our new Cylons. I think that's a perfect ending to the show and ties most of the themes together nicely.

      I personally think that the meta-story ended pretty well. I think the finale was executed poorly though (except as I said above, for the last 5 minutes which I thought was awesome). The opera house scene was especially poorly executed and not, in my opinion, the way they wanted to demonstrate the concept they were aiming for. I think rather than "cop out", many are upset that this particular scene turned out to be so anti-climactic, and so ham-fistedly written. It was supposed to be huge, it came across very awkward and out of character for Baltar, Caprica Six and particularly Cavil.

    3. Re:Yes, always. by Dexter+Herbivore · · Score: 1

      Ahem, do the words Deus ex Machina mean anything to you?

    4. Re:Yes, always. by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      Who says the Galactica "God" is all powerful and all knowing?

      Jehovah in the Old Testament is hardly all-knowing (he screws up and has to restart civilization with the flood, in the garden of Eden he's caught by surprise at one point, etc.)
      In virtually every other religion, gods are simply much more advanced people and hardly omniscient or omnipotent - the Greek and Roman gods especially so, and I dare say that Galactica takes as much of its godstuff from those traditions as from the Judeo-Christian ones. There might have been a few nods to the Norse mythos if I remember right, and certainly those gods were ANYTHING but omniscient and omnipotent - really just jumped up mortals.

      As to motivation and why Galactica god would nave "needed" or "wanted" to have the characters act like that - the point was made on the show that it is impossible to understand god in terms of human motivations; god isn't good or evil, god is a force of nature. If you want some more traditional explanations, look again at the Judeo-Christian mythos: God sends his only begotten son down to Earth to suffer for our sins, god messes with Job's head to prove his faith, god does all kinds of really crazy stuff that makes absolutely no sense unless you say something along the lines of "it makes sense to god."

      As to why Galactica-God would have made certain people behave the way they did, first, who's to say that they were people, strictly speaking? The characters who were manipulated may not have had any choice in what ultimately happened to them (the greek concept of destiny here - you'll wind up in spot Z, which is very vaguely defined, but how you actually get there and what it means when that happens is up to you), or they might not have had ANY free will at all and been simply scripted bots for the other characters to interact with. Why would Galactica-God do this? The answer, in this case, I suspect is the same as why any teacher or parent puts trials in front of their students or children - to teach them. Why did my teacher back in 2nd grade make me solve arithmetic problems when she had could do it herself? Why did she make me solve them on paper instead of letting me use a calculator? Why have me read excerpts from various readings and explain them when they'd already been explained and there would likely be absolutely nothing new that a 7 year-old could add to that? To teach me and help me grow. Within the context of Galactica, the god there wants the characters to grow and develop and learn, it seems to me - they have to make choices, solve problems, become more true to who they are, and one way of doing that is to set up situations where they have the possibility to do that.

      Or, on yet another level, what motivation do I have for launching Civ 4 and trying to conquer the world? What motivation do I have for logging into World of Warcraft and having my character beat the crap out of other characters? What motivation do I have for creating a universe for my friends to go tromping through when I run Mutants and Masterminds for them? The answer is: it amuses me to do so. In the context of Galactica, god:colonials::me:Civ4 nation I control - the rudimentary AI in the game wouldn't be able to remotely comprehend what I'm doing on any level (and yes, I know, the AI in the game is not actually self-aware or anything - which is my point: god in Galactica is operating on a vastly different level than the characters)

      I suspect your problem with the god stuff in Galactica comes more from the conflict between what you imagine a god to be and what the writers of the show had Galactica-God be - you're attributing things to that god that just weren't attributed or were more metaphorical than literal. And, in fact, if they had made a point that god was literally *all* powerful and *all* knowing and infinite, then yes, as a story it would be entirely pointless.

      Personally, I'm as non-theistic as anyone, and while I know what you mean about the idea of god being a cop out, in this case I absolutely disagree with you. I

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    5. Re:Yes, always. by genner · · Score: 1

      Or, on yet another level, what motivation do I have for launching Civ 4 and trying to conquer the world? What motivation do I have for logging into World of Warcraft and having my character beat the crap out of other characters? What motivation do I have for creating a universe for my friends to go tromping through when I run Mutants and Masterminds for them?

      Meh...ok then I'm going back to bed.
      I suddenly lack motivation.

    6. Re:Yes, always. by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      Who said that the character sometimes called 'God' in BSG is all powerful and all knowing? Well...maybe Baltar said it. But who said that Baltar's religion was in any way a representation of the truth? He clearly didn't believe it. Don't spoil a good story by bringing in Christian baggage. This is not a Christian story.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    7. Re:Yes, always. by bdh · · Score: 1

      deus ex machina: literally translated, means god from the machine. The expression is used to denote an unlikely agent which arrives to resolve an apparently hopeless situation; or, a contrived and inartistic solution of a difficulty in plot.

      It's on my website :-)

      SPOILERS HO

      I expected the ending of BSG to be a tragedy. I didn't expect it literally, however. It was a tragedy not only in the modern sense, but in the historical "Greek tragedy" sense as well.

      There were a lot of things to like about the new BSG. But there was a lot of silliness, too. The original idea, that humans were on the run from a relentless force that had a plan was intriguing, right up until the point where the plan was revealed.

      The idea that the Cylons were hunting the humans in order to breed with them made zero sense. Occam's razor would dictate that if they wanted Cylon/Human hybrids, it would be a hell of a lot easier to do so when there were 12 planets teeming with humankind than it would be to wipe out 99.9999% of the human race, then hunt down the surviving 0.0001% and mate with them. Are we supposed to believe that they deliberately let the Galactica survive? Or did they only start working on this plan after they destroyed the colonies?

      And boy, it was a lucky thing that the final Cylons just *happened* to all get together on that one ship, eh?

      The running gag was that the Cylons had a plan, we just with that they'd let the writers in on it. Add to that the nonsense of "the final five", where in an interview, Ron Moore admitted that the writers had no idea who they were, and it's obvious that they were making the show up as they went along. It's kind of difficult to get involved with a complex plot when the writers are just throwing darts to create plot resolutions.

      In the end, the finale was not the resolution of a multiyear story arc that culminated in a logical conclusion (see: Babylon 5). It was the writers looking at the wall, seeing the clock was running down, and realizing that they had 30 minutes to wrap up 4 years of plotlines.

      Look at that last half hour.
      - Starbuck punches in random co-ordinates into the FTL drive (based on a song in her head)
      - said jump trashes the Galactica so it can never jump again (forcing an end to the series)
      - hey look! the fleet just happened to jump next to a perfectly suitable planet!
      - the planet has human life, just like the Colonials (odds against? "Astronomical")
      - the Colonials decide to destroy all their tech and go camping for 150,000 years
          (with "surprisingly little dissent")
      - they destroy the entire fleet by driving it into the sun
      - what the hell, we wanted Earth, let's call this place Earth
      - 150,000 years later, it's Live From New York!

      Wait a second. Wouldn't we have found evidence of a superior civilization that predates us by 150,000 years (see: Inherit the Stars)? No, they conveniently decided to chuck all that for no reason. What about the Battlestar and other vessels? Nope, trashed them too. What about a settlement? No, they spread out.

      You're the last 35,000 members of your species. You've just landed on an unknown, unfamiliar, but inhabited planet. You don't know the wildlife, the flora, or the natives. You're led by professional soldiers. So what do you do? Throw away all your technology, and split up.

      The only reason a hardened military unit that just came out of a running war would do something that stupid is that the writers decreed they had to. Because if they didn't, if they acted like their training and experience had conditioned them too, then there would be physical evidence of their existence, and that would blow the finale.

      This was a copout on an epic scale.

    8. Re:Yes, always. by sakari · · Score: 1

      God isn't some thing. God is in every one of us. Church, religion and the likes are just diversions from the real true god or whatever you want to call him. If you look at the plot from that view of point, it makes much more sense.

  44. I would think that some would go back to Caprica by TuballoyThunder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If all the bad Cylons got wiped out on the colony, I am surprised that some of the Colonials did not opt to go back to the Colonies. The indications that we have from the show is that the nuclear attack did not render the planet uninhabitable like the Cylon Earth.

    There should be a good amount workable technology left and inhabitable structures. Supposedly you only need about 1000 to 5000 humans to repopulate.

    The other thought I had was whether anybody went back to pick up the Number Three D'Anna Biers.

  45. The end of the human race by itayperl · · Score: 1

    There's one thing I don't get.

    The "end of the human race" was predicted many times along the way:

    Head Six: I'm an angel of god sent here to protect you. To guide you, to love you.
    Baltar: To what end?
    Head Six: To the end of the human race.

    And in the finale she tells him his role is over, when the future of the human race looks brighter than ever.

    What gives?

    1. Re:The end of the human race by wembley+fraggle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it's similar to how Kara Thrace is supposed to lead them to their end as well - it's end as in end of the journey, rather than the wiping out of all existence.

    2. Re:The end of the human race by Archimonde · · Score: 1

      They were just inventing stuff as they went. That explains the final few episodes of season 3 and a whole season 4. When you invent stuff on the fly it is bound to return like an angry boomerang. I rewatched mini+season 1, season 2 and a good deal of season 3 the last month. The best and mind blowing series I have ever watched and those episodes are completely different from the later ones where they completely dropped the ball.

      --
      Trolls are like broken clocks. They show the truth two times a day. The rest of the day they talk nonsense.
    3. Re:The end of the human race by prockcore · · Score: 1

      You're assuming "human" to them means the same thing as "human" to us.

      Let me put it this way: you think they were speaking English? They weren't.

    4. Re:The end of the human race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      end of the *human* race....

      they interbreed (with Cylons, our ancestors) and are not "human" in their sense of the word any more.

    5. Re:The end of the human race by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      What gives is that the human race is dead (along with the cylons). All the people alive today are human/cylon hybrids.

    6. Re:The end of the human race by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is not clear.

      The only statement made is that the father was human and the mother was Cylon.

      It could have easily been Caprica and Baltar eventually having a child as Baltar finally came around and actually 'loved' Caprica.

      There is no reason to assume anything about Hera beyond that she made it to this Earth with them because the story ended there.

      You can't even assume that it happened during that generation. It is entirely possible that Ty and Ellen eventually were able to reproduce, had a girl, who then mated with a completely unknown human or native.

      They never specified WHO was 'Eve', just that she was born of a Cylon mother and Human father.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    7. Re:The end of the human race by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I think it's similar to how Kara Thrace is supposed to lead them to their end as well - it's end as in end of the journey, rather than the wiping out of all existence.

      Hybrid: Kara Thrace will lead the human race to its end.
      Shaw: What?
      Hybrid: She is the herald of the apocalypse. The harbinger of death. They must not follow her.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  46. Favorite moments of the finale by lordofthechia · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Baltar takes down the Cylon mothership by uploading a virus using his Macbook. "Giving it a cold" indeed! Well played Dr. Baltar!
    2. All the sixes move to what later becomes modern day Sweden.

    --
    Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    1. Re:Favorite moments of the finale by jcr · · Score: 1

      All the sixes move to what later becomes modern day Sweden. ...and what they called sixes, we call tens.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  47. SEASON SPOILER!!! by Phizzle · · Score: 1

    Snape kills Dumbledore!!!!

    --
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
  48. Science Fiction Cliche's 101 by Yergle143 · · Score: 1

    I watched this show off and on and I kind of liked it. But the ending definitely followed the well worn path of the Shaggy God(s) story: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaggy_God_story towit man and woman marooned on a primitive planet who in the last sentence of the story are named Adam and Eve. Wikipedia points out some notable stories with the same motif. ---537

  49. the ending is so sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    obviously all the natives die because of
    one big plague the surviving galactica people
    bring to them: religion. har-har
    -
    i say keep the tech, ditch the religion .. but NO.

  50. Okay, but very inconsistent and unsatisfying by NormAtHome · · Score: 1

    First, the writers did a terrible job in that the last story arc directly contradicted a story from last season. (or was it the season before) It was mentioned that the Cylons had the resurrection hub because it was "too far" for transmission from where the battles took place to the Cylon home world. This was revealed by one of the number six's, so even if the hub was destroyed they supposedly still had the technology on the home world and really all they needed was to build a new hub. Making the story about the need for the final five having the secret total garbage.

    Also as someone else mentioned when a series is based on a secret and the reveal either isn't satisfying or the explanation makes no sense and some things aren't explained properly it sucks and this sucked. Who was the "replacement" Starbuck? Where did the music come from that "turned" the final five on and how was it that her father had it? Also any number of other questions were left to our imagination.

    1. Re:Okay, but very inconsistent and unsatisfying by Archimonde · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My belief is that they ran out of good ideas at the end of the second season. First part of the third season was good too, but what followed later (couple of final 3rd season and whole season 4) was a completely different show in my opinion. The problem was they were just inventing stuff on the fly (even by their own admission!) and that recoiled of course because the show now was full of inconsistencies and pretty much had no decent storyline. When you compare the first 2.5 seasons to the remaining 1.5 seasons you are pretty much looking at the different series, just with the same actors. The first 2.5 seasons were absolutely the best series I have ever watched; good storyline, action packed, spectacular space battles, extremely exciting, good cliffhangers, cylon mistique etc. But compare that to the rest of the show (the last 1.5 seasons) and you get complete bullshit like that final five mysticism (well it started somewhat acceptable, but turned out completely unplausible), starbuck resurrection, moon sized plot holes (ressurection ships/hubs, hera child which is just blah, starbuck music, coordinates...), stupid later opera house sequences, baltar's stupid and useless cult, apollo turn into a lawyer/politician, no action, melodrama, life and death pseudophilosophy, presiden't who just won't die etc. After disappointing last few season 3 series I was hoping that they realized what mistakes they made and amend them in season 4. But first part of season 4 was barely watchable then there was a huge pause and the second part of the season 4 arrived. They introduced that mutiny but that was it. The show was dead anyway. I just knew two days ago that the finale would be unsatisfactory and I was somewhat right. I won't go into it, many other posters explained anyway.

      It is just such a shame that this show wasted the last season even though it could have been the greatest.

      --
      Trolls are like broken clocks. They show the truth two times a day. The rest of the day they talk nonsense.
    2. Re:Okay, but very inconsistent and unsatisfying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People in our modern society tend to underestimate their need for technology until they don't have it. Silly Hollywood lefties think that 'giving up our technology' just means that they go on a cool camping trip.

        Typically these people have never had to be in a survival situation and they have no clue how harsh the world is without our technology to buffer us.

      I think what you saw in the BSG finale was a perfect example of this mentality. Put those technologically spoiled writers out in the woods with nothing but their bare hands and the clothes on their backs for a few weeks and my guess is the finale would have been a lot different.

      -Ken

    3. Re:Okay, but very inconsistent and unsatisfying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I perfectly agree on your outlook considering the timeline. 2.5 was great, and I was converting friends who do not normally like sci-fi to watch. Most are my age when it was the first series of battlestar. They thought the same thing and all gave up around the end of the third season. Thats fine for them, but I'll stick it out for the nostalgia. I was really not liking the whole baltar (religous baltar) part. It was dribble. I'll watch a boring soap opera if I wan't to talk about a boring plot. He was a traitor in the first series. He was like a hitler of sorts. Now he is a guy that has no true identity and is seen as a good guy to some. I would still kick his ass on the new (second) earth as soon as the raptor landed.
      Sorry...I was venting about an actor/character. But I do agree with your comments about the transition from the original year or two to the final stuff. It was a major change and not necessarily in my opinion for the best. It still does have to be recoginized as one of the more loved shows on TV. I cannot use the last as a dismissal on the whole.

      Sean

    4. Re:Okay, but very inconsistent and unsatisfying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever read Vinge's "Cookie Monster?" Think of the universe as the simulation in Cookie Monster, and "All Around the Watchtower" as the cookie. It's the one thing that drifts from cycle to cycle. The entity (he doesn't like to be called that) who created Head Gaius, Head Six, and Starbuck Mark II uses it to keep the cycles going until they work their way out of the trap.

  51. Because frostbite is so very appealing. by khasim · · Score: 1

    You want dysentery don't you? All the cool kids have dysentery. Dump all your existing technology and get yourself a nice case of dysentery.

    No, that makes no sense whatsoever. The only people who would think it does have never had to deal with the wilderness on an extended basis.

    Who cares about rebuilding civilization? This is about surviving the winter.

    1. Re:Because frostbite is so very appealing. by anagama · · Score: 1

      Very well put, and very succinct. My impression too is that writers think food comes from supermarkets and have lived an altogether too comfortable life to produce a believable ending.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    2. Re:Because frostbite is so very appealing. by hughk · · Score: 1

      The main factors influencing dysentery is hygiene or as once succinctly put the distance between where you defecate and where you eat. High population densities increase risk especially in hot climates.

      The problem comes down to how to bootstrap a civilisation with only 37K people and the equipment you could take with you. A settlement needs food supplies and cultivation. They need wheeled transport, dry storage and so on. In any case, the Rift Valley/Serengeti would not be amenable to much cultivation. There is reason that civilisation started in the area of the Tigris/Euphrates not in the savannahs of Africa.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    3. Re:Because frostbite is so very appealing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Tigris/Euphrates area of Africa was not necessarily Savannah 150k years ago. Just like Egypt was grassland 6k years ago and not desert.

      Survive the winter?

      The Afican colony is all we were shown and that area is (not currently) known for very cold winters. Who knows about 150k years ago? I'm not a geo/antro/archi-ologist, but I do watch/read enough to know these basic facts.

      We don't know what the other colonies took as supplies so who knows, maybe warm clothing and rations (food pellet) were included because they did know they'd be going to colder climes.

      I wasn't there so I don't know :)

  52. Cupcakes to honor the finale by forevermore · · Score: 1

    My wife is a huge fan of the show (probably more than me), and decided to honor the finale by making up a batch of mandala-inspired cupcakes. We were both happy to see the mandala make a short cameo toward the end.

    --
    Do you really need reason for beer? Wingman Brewers
  53. holes in the story by Skal+Tura · · Score: 1, Redundant

    It was great how the Opera House was tied into the story, but this ending has a lot of annoying gaps.

    How Gaius and 6 were 150,000 years in the future?
    What is Kara?
    Why did they smash their fleet?
    Why didn't the cylon base get damage from galactica practically jumping partially from inside of it?

    In any case, this finale was rather good in the sense that it raised interesting questions, and tied some things together, despite the gaps in the plot (they ran out of airing time??) i highly enjoyed this finale!

    1. Re:holes in the story by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      How Gaius and 6 were 150,000 years in the future?

      That was head-Six and head-Baltar, not Six and Baltar themselves. They're angels or demons or whatever, agents of the higher power that's been guiding them.

      What is Kara?

      It's vague, but basically an angel along the lines of head-Six and head-Baltar.

      Why did they smash their fleet?

      After five years of running from the technology they'd created, that was trying to kill them, and understanding that the cycle of technology->destruction of humanity kept going, they decided to try pastoralism--living a low-tech country lifestyle that would possibly give them a chance to break the cycle by maturing spiritually as well as technologically.

      Also, remember that their fleet was on its last legs. The ships were falling apart, and other ships were talking about cannibalizing Galactica for parts. They had guns with no method for making ammunition, and medicine with no method for replacing stocks of antibiotics. Their technological lifestyle was at its ragged end, so swapping it for a pastoral lifestyle where they keep some knives and binoculars didn't seem like such a bad trade.

      Finally, when the colonists settled the twelve planets, they destroyed their ships. There's a long tradition of doing so as a way of committing yourself to a decision.

      Why didn't the cylon base get damage from galactica practically jumping partially from inside of it?

      Presumably it did, but it had just been hit by a volley of nukes, and was kind of fucked all over.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    2. Re:holes in the story by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      Fletcher Christian scuttled the Bounty at Pitcairn Island to avoid detection by the British fleet.

      Those two remaining basestars.... why leave them something to look for? Go native, ditch the tech.

      Worked (so far) for Osama Bin Laden.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    3. Re:holes in the story by painandgreed · · Score: 3, Informative
      Here are my answers. Others differ and I hear the final release DVD will have an additional 20 minutes to the last two episodes that might explain some bits they didn't flesh out.

      How Gaius and 6 were 150,000 years in the future?

      Those are the Seraphs (I prefer the old show term rather than Angels) that looked like Gaius and 6, not the actual people.

      What is Kara?

      She was Kara, who had transcended and become a Seraph. She went back to show the people the way and once done, rejoined them. Again this is parallel to the old series as there really is no reason to even have Kara disappear in the new series except to mimic the disappearance in the old series. In the old series the Seraphs were people who had transcended or evolved to that form. Starbuck joined them and then sent aid to the fleet to show them where Earth was in the form of a child. In the new series, Starbuck joined the Seraphs and then just went back herself to show them the way and then left to rejoin the Seraphs once her job was done.

      Why did they smash their fleet?

      Two lines of thought on this besides the short sighted "abandon tech" answer so many people are whining about. First, the fleet was all that much of an advantage. They'd been living on it for four years and steadily losing about 10% of their population each year. Life on the fleet was no fun ride. They had already run out of most supplies like toothpaste and almost starved once. Probably all the ships were damaged near as much as Galactica. They may have taken less damage but they were also built to take less damage. They stripped them and there simply really wasn't anything left of value, especially since most things of value for starting a colony has been used on New Caprica and left there. They were probably even running out of fuel and didn't have the means to mount another successful operation since they couldn't even mine it IIRC. Two, a large fleet in orbit, on the planet or even in the system would have been a large sign to any basestars that came into the system that they were there and defencless. Since the cylons didn't really seem all that intent on killing all life just that of the 12 colonies, chances are that basestars will jump into the system, scan and find no ships, just some primitives, and then jump away if they are looking for the fleet.

      Also, as somebody else pointed out, the 12 colonies apparently also destroyed their ships upon founding the twelve colonies after leaving Kobol, so there is a heritage of such.

      Why didn't the cylon base get damage from galactica practically jumping partially from inside of it?

      I imagine it did along with the initial ramming and the nukes. They were in such an hurry to jump out that I felt everything was in danger of falling into the black hole (which is pretty much only a plot device for stuff to fall into as the rest of the safe jump location stuff could have easily been explained as the asteroid feild to begin with).

    4. Re:holes in the story by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      How Gaius and 6 were 150,000 years in the future?
      It wasn't Gaius and 6. It was two immortal beings who used Gaius and 6's forms. The "real" 6 saw "Gaius" during the series and Gaius was always seeing "6". We assumed that they were hallucinations for a while but over time it became clear they were real but invisible to everyone except their chosen target. They could have appeared as large purple beings with tentacles in the last 5 minutes but as a convenience to the viewer, they were in the forms we had grown used to.

      What is Kara?
      Probably a ghost or angel- or a person akin to Bruce Willis in the movie where he is a ghost but doesn't know it.

      Why did they smash their fleet?
      They decided that having technology would doom them to very quickly rebuilding their population and technology and then having another war with cylons (or new cylons they would inevitably create). They felt that if they dropped having technology they might break the cycle of destruction.

      Why didn't the cylon base get damage from galactica practically jumping partially from inside of it?
      Given the damage the raptor did jumping out next to Galactica, it is clear the special effects people just didn't get the memo. It should have done massive damage to that tiny part of the colony and it did *no damage at all*. It's basically a mistake on their part. That happens in TV shows which are never 100% consistent.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    5. Re:holes in the story by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      you had it until the point the colonists of the original 12 colonies destroyed their ships. They didn't destroy their ships, there was thriving commerce for many generations between planets. But early on, you could tell some planets had been turned into "serfs" and menial labor for the "better" planets. That was the cycle of human-on-human abuse they were trying to end as well.

  54. I'll never understand people like you by Weaselmancer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hated practically every inch of it from the get-go

    I hate to post the obvious, but I'll do it anyways.

    Why watch it in the first place then?

    Holy crap, man. Do you eat at restaurants you hate? "Man. Every time I come here I hate it. Disgusting food. See you next Thursday."

    If anyone should be embarrassed, it's you. Four seasons worth of hour long shows and you watched them all, hating almost every single moment. Imagine what else you could have done with that time.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  55. Adama goes to live on a mountain alone? WTF? by patniemeyer · · Score: 1

    Why wouldn't Adama live with his son (family) in the new civilization? To me this was more ridiculous than Kara disappearing.

    1. Re:Adama goes to live on a mountain alone? WTF? by patniemeyer · · Score: 1

      There was an interview with one of the directors a while back in which he basically confirmed my worst fears about the show - that they filmed things without knowing where they were going in the plot and then made up storyline for them later.

      Now, I can understand it would be difficult to write a series without knowing exactly when it would end (in which season)... but come on... A lot of people wasted a lot of time watching this and they deserved better.

  56. Evolution Anyone? by altronic · · Score: 1

    I've been thinking about this and haven't come up with a satisfactory answer. The Battlestar Galactia crew believes in evolution since Lee says the human critters they encounter are at the "pre-verbal" stage of evolution and Saul finds it amazing that humans evolved independently on another planet, but the repeated destruction of civilization and the distribution of Galactia humans around the planet is a lot like Cuvier's catastrophism and the distribution of species, i.e. God periodically wipes a species out and then plops down pre-formed critters on different continents and, voila, that's what people and animals have looked like since the day they appeared on Earth. This coupled with the explanation that a higher power is directing all of this....well, I wonder if this was intentional or an accident of trying to wrap up the story as fast as possible.

  57. Gog did it can be ok, but not in this case by tomhayes · · Score: 1

    It's not *just* the "God did it" explanation for several major recurring plot points that disappointed me, its that it was done so poorly. To be fair I thought *a lot* of this series was poor, like the demands of the remaining humans to have their civil rights restored *while* still having to jump a head of the cylons every 12 minutes (or whatever the time frame was), and the "civil wars starts on the drop of a dime" coup stuff that kept coming around every season or so. A picture of this series should be in the dictionary next to the definition for "potboiler." (And as an atheist I do sometimes thing the "God did it thing" is a-ok. Dune Messiah (and the books after that, but before his son started writing them) have wonderful, and *understandable* prophecies, gods, half-human/half-san worm characters. Hell, the Honored Matres could be seen as Cyclons in some sense. And the robots-are-soon-to-be-skynet-cylons ending felt very,very tacked on.

  58. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  59. MAX_KILL_AMOUNT 65535 by sadler121 · · Score: 3, Funny

    So in other words they killed a total of 65535 Humans?

    1. Re:MAX_KILL_AMOUNT 65535 by CheeseTroll · · Score: 4, Funny

      What, are they keeping track in Excel??

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    2. Re:MAX_KILL_AMOUNT 65535 by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Word.

    3. Re:MAX_KILL_AMOUNT 65535 by God_TM · · Score: 1

      640K humans ought to be enough for anybody.

  60. All will be revealed? by witherstaff · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ok, I suck at writing, but you get my drift.

    That's alright, so do the BSG writers.

    After some of the major plotholes left and advertising that 'everything will be answered' they didn't live up to the promise. I didn't want everything gift wrapped and handed to me. I'm alright with Starbuck being an angel / ascended being/ whichever. While overall I think BSG was probably the best sci fi show I've seen there were enough plotlines hanging that I wasn't satisfied. Here's some of them, major and minor.

    • What happened to all the other 'bad cylons'? They won't know what happened at Cavil's base so they'll still be out there hunting down humanity. When I saw Hera look up at the end I was expecting a basestar to appear.
    • What about the other remnants of humanity on the 12 planets? Was sam's resistance the last group left?
    • No one got left behind on New Caprica?
    • No more human babies were being made? So you ditch technology and also give up sex? I just can't buy that.
    • Without technology at all that means Hera was furthering the population by the traditional method? There's some near bestiality in her future.
    • I'm actually surprised they didn't all land on the island of atlantis or mu. Those who wanted to leave tech behind could leave, those who wanted some staple of life would stay. Let the audience chuckle imagining what mishap caused the island to explode.

    Then again I'm also the type to wonder why the idiots stranded on the island in Lost didn't put up a wooden palisade around their camp the first time a boar ran through it or someone was abducted. Advancing the plot is one thing, being stupid is another.

    1. Re:All will be revealed? by Kielistic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "No more human babies were being made? So you ditch technology and also give up sex? I just can't buy that."

      Easy, after giving up all their technology they subsequently all died of starvation, infection, disease, territory battle with the stronger, faster more adapted natives within two weeks. Meaning Kara actually was the harbinger of death because she brought everyone to Earth 2.0 where they all got themselves killed. And god didn't just keep calling her that to mess with her.

      Although Hera being mitochondrial Eve doesn't actually mean no one else mated, just that her bloodline eventually mated with everyone.

    2. Re:All will be revealed? by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I found myself asking each of these questions. The only one I can answer satisfactorily is that the other cylons just died out. They couldn't resurrect and they can't breed. They didn't keep any Bob Dylan on hand, so they didn't know the phone number for New Earth and even if they happened on it, the lack of technology would make the planet appear uninteresting.

    3. Re:All will be revealed? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      No more human babies were being made? So you ditch technology and also give up sex? I just can't buy that.

      No, not at all. Rather, all female descendants of the humans died out, possibly due to disease or some other form of natural selection. Hera was the mitochondrial DNA source for all of modern humanity, but that doesn't mean that human DNA from males was wiped out. (Perhaps it was; maybe it all comes from the natives, but the show doesn't specify.)

      Of course since Hera's mitochondrial DNA should have come only from Sharon, that means that part of our DNA is entirely Cylon, while the rest could be any ratio from 100% human to 100% Cylon depending on interbreeding.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    4. Re:All will be revealed? by physicsphairy · · Score: 1

      What happened to all the other 'bad cylons'? They won't know what happened at Cavil's base so they'll still be out there hunting down humanity.

      Well, they only have the natural life expectancy of a cylon to do so, what with the loss of the resurrection hub. Also, presumably the 'naturally evolved' humans on the 'new earth' have been around for millions of years without being found. After sending all of the spaceships into the sun, the technological signatures the cyclons are accustomed to identifying with humanity no longer exist.

      What about the other remnants of humanity on the 12 planets? Was sam's resistance the last group left?

      Unless they had a secret store of spaceships, I assume they were trapped there when the cylons left. And they would have died off once they ran out of radiation meds.

      # No one got left behind on New Caprica?

      The cylon plan once they lost control was to nuke the planet. The Three ultimately did not do this because she found Hera, but it seems reasonable to assume that they would have later nuked it from space once Hera was safe.

  61. What makes you think they became cavemen? by Garwulf · · Score: 1

    "Instead, they threw it all away, and opted to become cavemen."

    I keep reading that from people, and I really can't understand why that is what people project on the future of the Colonials. Why cavemen? I mean, I may be training as a historian, and I do have an interest in ancient history and anthropology, but the idea that they became cavemen seems rather obviously wrong to me.

    What I think would have happened is this: you would have gotten a number of small, scattered farming communities. These communities would see rapid growth in the first few generations, although they'd remain subsistence farmers. Eventually, they'd gain enough critical mass for towns, and in a few generations, those towns might become cities.

    Realistically speaking, that's the only logical way they could have had the civilization survive anyway. It's true that they're starting with a great deal of technology at their finger-tips, but they don't have the technological resources to reproduce it. At best, they can keep it running as long as possible, but you're talking about that technology breaking down within a couple of generations anyway.

    Think of it this way. They've survived with computers, but it takes a lot to build a computer. You have to be able to get the silicon for parts, you need the machinery to make the circuit-boards, etc. That's stuff they'd have to rebuild, and with their small population, they don't have time for that.

    So, you would see cities again within a few generations. You'd see civilizations rising, expanding, and eventually dying. There's nothing to say this isn't the way it happens - keep in mind, we're talking about landfall on Earth being 150 THOUSAND years ago. The entire city of Toronto could have been there that long ago, and we wouldn't have any signs of it today.

    --
    Robert B. Marks
    Author, Demonsbane in Diablo Archive
    1. Re:What makes you think they became cavemen? by anagama · · Score: 1

      It's a whole lot easier to learn how to smelt metal from ore when you have enough food to live and at least a little time to experiment. Throwing all their metal into the sun means that farming or hunting food will take all of everyone's time, always be inadequate in terms of volume and nutrition, and essentially doom them all to an early death. Stupid raw death was the plan -- this is how Starbuck is the Harbinger of death. Once Starbuck gets them to earth, God makes them all lose all sense of rationality. They all die in the next 24 months, except for Hera. She has a better immune system so doesn't die off immediately from disease. One of the head guys in an indigenous band decides he wants her after attacking Hera's group and killing everyone else to get at the gazelle they had managed to bag. Thus she manages to live just long enough to become mitochondrial eve.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    2. Re:What makes you think they became cavemen? by ardor · · Score: 1

      Dismantle the entire fleet, and build a small colony with the parts. Concentrate on building essential infrastructure like mines, farms, canals and eventually irrigation, and create electricity as soon as possible.

      The scientific portion of the colonists could start writing their mathematical knowledge into sturdy tomes that last for generations, since mathematics is absolutely essential for eventual rediscovery of how their stuff worked. Also, mention the basics of the jump drives, material science, power generation, engineering in general. Don't necessarily go into details. It is not important to explain all of it completely, but it IS important to mention that these things really work, because then its no longer a question of "if" this is possible, but only "how".

      All of this is doable in a generation. They did it alredy on New Caprica, a planet with significantly less resources. There is no reason why they couldn't do it on Earth. Of course they wouldn't be able to pull off a Caprica city from scratch.

      Ultimately, I think their pre-fall civilization made a colossal mistake by sticking to these 12 planets. Spreading out is how species can increase their odds of surviving. Then again, apparently their civilization was utterly decadent, lazy, corrupt. Still, it is a bit odd that they never spread out more.

      --
      This sig does not contain any SCO code.
    3. Re:What makes you think they became cavemen? by mjensen · · Score: 1

      All of your post is about "generations", not a thing about the people of Galactica.

      The people of Galactica would help some of the inhabitants, but for the most part the inhabitants are going to be only slightly better off in 40 years, while the Galactica people are now dead.

      For the rest of their lives, the crew would have to revert to the simpler life of the general population. Yes, the general population would benefit, but the focus is about the living status of the Galactica people.

  62. SPOILER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... it turns out that everyone is a Cylon.

  63. The Cylons Had a Plan ... by Prototerm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... Too bad Ron Moore didn't. And it shows!

    --
    "My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right." --Senator Carl Schurz (1872)
  64. Re:Dissenting opinion: Jumped the shark then drown by anagama · · Score: 1

    Like you, I thought the ending sucked. But I think I'm starting to get it. Starbuck IS the harbinger of death. She leads everyone to New Earth, where they somehow lose all sense of rationality (we'll chalk that up to God) and toss everything in the fire. As a result of their idiocy, all the colonists die within a year or two. EXCEPT Hera. Hera's immune system helps her survive diseases better so that when she is captured in a barbarian raid, she survives long enough to be forced into a relationship with the tribal Big Dog as soon as she hits puberty. Thus, Hera becomes M. Eve.

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  65. who cares about the plot holes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best part of this episode was the flashbacks to Caprica of each character, and tying it together with their destinies at their journey's end. Incredibly beautiful.

  66. Then vs Now by erica_ann · · Score: 1

    As a child, I grew up on the 2 original BSGs .. and loved them. Fort he first 2 seasons, I refused to watch the new BSG. I was appalled they changed Starbuck to a female.. Then one day I happened to see it accidentally not realizing it was the new BSG.. and yes, I was hooked. I had to go back and see all the first 2 seasons.

    I fell in love and carried the storylines all the way through. I am glad I did too.. I loved it and it always kept me wanting more.

    The ending I loved. Everything that happened the past few weeks I never thought would. Adama give the lady up?? I was captured till the end when Starbuck jumped the ship and they found earth. Ok, for me, I was happy they did.. but to me, the last half just was not in accord with the other seasons. I did like how they explained Hera though.. but I was still left hanging with so many questions.

  67. Shades of mysogeny and role reversal by S-100 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    BSG was by far the best thing on television, but did anyone else notice the undercurrent of violence particularly towards women? That, and the tendency for strong male figures to break down into emotional Jello? By the end of the series, NONE of the remaining principal characters were human females. Laura Roslin, Starbuck, Dualla and Callie were all dead.

    I'm not talking about the Starbuck character's sex change. That, taken by itself was a great decision. Women in action/sf movies are almost exclusively portrayed as tough-as-nails, drink the guys under the table, A-type overachievers, and in that regard BSG was no different. But what disturbed me was the repetitive and gruesome nature of the violence that seemed to be more focused on women.

    Sharon/Athena's frequent facial beatings, complete with long-lasting bandages and bloody scars. Many instances of Sixes being beaten, tortured and raped, usually with lurid shots of bloody wounds and scars to the body and face. Countless beatings taken and given by Starbuck, usually accompanied with much blood. Callie gets tossed out of an airlock, but not before she gets beaten to a pulp by Tory, who in the end gets strangled to death with Ty's bare hands. Pilots killed in space battles seem to be disproportionately women, and they die not so much in a ball of flame as usual, but in a way where we can view the lifeless corpse. There's Dualla's pointless suicide, ironically just after the character drops the "killer chick" facade. For years we witnessed the slow and painful deterioration of Laura Roslyn, with plenty of humiliating shots in a hospital bed, and years of moaning and grunting in pain. It was such a relief just to see her die peacefully. Ellen Tigh gets poisoned by her husband, and then barely escapes being dissected alive. A similar fate awaited the innocent child Hera, who only had to face days of terror, starvation and isolation. D'Anna dares to speak out against authority and in return she and her clone sisters are "boxed" and ultimately all destroyed save her. Sure, Baltar got his ass kicked a lot, but he deserved it. The only gruesome and painful injury to a male that I recall is to Felix, with his nagging amputation. Of course, the ancillary BSG episodes show him to be gay...

    So in typical BSG ambiguity, it leaves us with a question. In the eyes of the producers, are these women truly "liberated", or do they have to pay a price for living in a man's world? Similarly (even congruently), are men weakened when surrounded by strong women?

    1. Re:Shades of mysogeny and role reversal by cjstaples · · Score: 1

      ...The only gruesome and painful injury to a male that I recall is to Felix, with his nagging amputation...

      The loss of an eye isn't a gruesome and painful injury? I think Tigh would disagree.

      --
      =cjs
    2. Re:Shades of mysogeny and role reversal by Nebulious · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I disagree. You're hand picking facts. Everybody suffers in Battlestar, not just the women. Saul loses an eye. Cavil describes being left to die and having to take his own life by scraping open an artery using a bullet casing. The first time we meet Leoben, he's dying of radiation. The second time? We get to watch Starbuck torture him for a whole hour before Roslyn tosses him out the airlock. Surely you didn't miss the part the part where Anders gets the bullet in his head and is then flown into the sun by his own wife?

      Sorry, but I don't see any bias against any sex in this show. Not even in sex appeal with the way women keep oogling that towel shot of Apollo.

    3. Re:Shades of mysogeny and role reversal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when was BSG a portrait of a perfect society? And given that you can't spell misogyny, I'm guessing you're just a troll.

    4. Re:Shades of mysogeny and role reversal by S-100 · · Score: 1

      Did Tigh lose his eye on camera? And not that anyone would look forward to it, the eye has no pain receptors so the pain of extracting an eye is limited to damage to the surrounding viscera. Tigh doesn't even appear to have had a scar, or much of one.

      And sure, everybody suffers, but describing something that's happened is a lot less powerful than watching it happen. As for Leoben, he seemed to be unique as the "punching bag" Cylon, but still not as bad as the Sixes throughout the series.

    5. Re:Shades of mysogeny and role reversal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An undercurrent of violence in a show about robots committing genocide on all of humanity?

      INCONCEIVABLE!

    6. Re:Shades of mysogeny and role reversal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feminism is a disease. It is horrible mental illness.

    7. Re:Shades of mysogeny and role reversal by tarius8105 · · Score: 1

      Yes but cherry picking facts is where you are wrong. Tigh did have a scar, they showed it multiple times he hides it with a home-made eye patch, its the empty eye socket that is grusome. Lets not forget that Adama's near fatal point blank gunshot by Boomer, where there was a nice shot of the incision going up and down the chest. Lets not forget the beatings Helo's received to the point where he couldnt walk and he was all bloodied. How about Balter at gun point forced to sign a death list. Then there is Anders bleeding from a gunshot to the head. That guy who ran the death squad on New Caprica that was chucked out an airlock. Leoben was only a punching bag cylon to Starbuck who found new ways to grusomely attack him, where as Tigh just poisoned his wife. Oh and your eye does have pain receptors.

    8. Re:Shades of mysogeny and role reversal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the fact that Dee, Tori and Felix were the only major minority characters (well, and 8, but her Boomer version is pretty horrible up until the end). I mean, sure, I hated Tori as much as anyone, but did they have to make her that way? And if we're believing (roughly) in the Christian god, Dee's suicide is probably some kind of sin. So here we have two potentially strong female, racial minority characters making morally wrong decisions. Not classy.

      I was even more upset by Felix's downfall. Here we had this great character who was both believable as a member of the crew and as a gay man (I love that they understated his sexuality, as the "gay caricature" is insulting and overused). So why on earth did he have to become so spiteful and lead the mutiny? I wish they had been a little more thoughtful about what he represents.

      Also, I didn't like Cavill being the poster child for atheism. It's like equating atheism to sadism and irrational close-mindedness, which is hardly the case.

  68. My ending is better by MobyDisk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I predicted the ending... and I was totally wrong. But mine was better. They totally set it up, they went another direction.

    First of all, Baltar has to be a Cylon. The fact that he is not can be nothing other than the writers making a mistake. That would explain how he:
        - Shared visions with a Cylon
        - Survived the nuclear blast on Caprica
        - Why Caprica 6 told him something like "How can you pretend so well?"
        - Knew intricacies of Cylon technology (Ex: Recognizing Cylon structures in the attack on the cylon base on the Asteroid - season 1 or 2 I think)
        - Was inherently monotheistic

    My ending would have involved time travel. They should have jumped into Earth, of the past, before the 12 colonies separated. I know, time travel is sorely overused, but it would totally have fit:
    - Explains why this has happened before and will happen again
    - How the 12 colonies were able to leave a marker about a Sun going supernova.
    - The "earth" in the end is the same Earth they found, only in the past. That is why Kara's body was found while she was still alive: She time traveled back to Earth of the past
    - The last episode involved a singularity and some magical coordinates - total time travel setup. She should have jumped them straight into the singularity and thus back in time.

    That's how I'll try to remember the series. It ties things up quite well.

    1. Re:My ending is better by mibus · · Score: 1

      I thought mine was pretty good too:

      The quorum was being set up as ship's captains; continue down that path but lose 2/3rds of the fleet - taking you down to 12 colonial ships plus the basestar.

      Give up on finding a "new" homeworld, go back and resettle on Kobol - forming 13 colonies...

      As for Kara, she could have been a half-Cylon herself (her father being Daniel, naturally). One of the Daniels escaped and built a copy of the resurrection tech that would work for him & his daughter.

      All in all though, as much as I don't like "God did it" as an ending, the rest of it was really nice, and gave "closure" even if it didn't tie up all the loose threads as much as I would have liked.

    2. Re:My ending is better by coaxial · · Score: 1

      I never bought into the "Baltar couldn't survive the blast" nonsense. He does. He has to, because if he doesn't you don't have the traitor among them. You don't have someone constantly fearing to be uncovered. That's also why you can't have Baltar as a cylon. He's the traitor. He's selfish. He's a dupe. He's arrogant. He's all of humanities failings. If he's a cylon, he's none of these. He's just doing his programming. There's nothing there.

      Boomer being a cylon was interesting, because of the dramatic irony. We knew she was going to do something bad. She didn't, and when she did she was scared and confused. She didn't want to be a cylon. She wanted to be Sharon Valleri from Pychon. She even tried to kill herself when she began to suspect the truth. There's none of that with Baltar.

      Also, time travel is just god on stilts, but you already knew that.

    3. Re:My ending is better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a good ending, but here's my ending:
      A group of the humans and Cylons reject the idea of losing all the technology and settle on a large secluded island to keep distant from the locals and still help out the rest of the former crew when trouble struck. Over time, the Atlantians become a more peaceful people, and strive towards enlightenment. When native peoples develop boats and find Atlantis, the Atlantians take a couple raptors and use their technology to make a Stargate and use it to evacuate Earth, destroying the technology to prevent its misuse. Thus, now the BSG descendants on Atlantis are the Ancients in Stargate, and a whole new show could be a spin-off of how the Goa'uld came to be, as well as the first ascended beings, etc.

    4. Re:My ending is better by SickLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      Agreed, Baltar has to be a cylon, even just to explain the shared visions.
      But which cyclon?

      My choice was the the boxed Daniel line.
      Also a good choice for Kara's father, as that subplot deserved resolution.

      Then Kara would be at least a hybrid, and then resurrection could resolve her 2nd incarnation.

      SLM

      --
      main() {1;} // zen app
    5. Re:My ending is better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have done Baltar different. I would have had the parts of Caprica blown into his body when the explosion went off in the beginning. Those parts would have been the ghost or split personalty part of him. Making him part Cylon artificially.

    6. Re:My ending is better by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      My ending would have involved time travel.

      Stop right there. God, no.

    7. Re:My ending is better by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      Not all time travel plot lines suck. Blame the later Trek years for that stigma.

  69. Insult to atheists everywhere by macraig · · Score: 0, Troll

    How any self-respecting atheist can tolerate the blatant propaganda and/or pandering to the majority ("we don't dare piss off the Christians and lose viewer share") that was evident in this series from the outset, and watch it for years in spite of it, is a mystery bigger than any in the plot of this show. I stopped watching it after the first few episodes, when it became OBVIOUS where it was ultimately headed; I didn't need to wait years to know that it would end with precisely the justifications that it did in the finale. I had issues with the original series for the same reason, even though I was still just a kid.

    I can't say with any certainty whether there was any real propagandistic intent, but it was obviously pandering to a certain religious majority. People have been praising it for the "risks" the show took with the plot, but that's basically bullshit: the biggest risk the show could have possibly taken would have been to ignore the reactions of that religious majority and present some true science fiction. The show's writers and producers took the cowardly route, though, and all viewers got was fantasy or mere fiction instead. The fact that this has been true of so much other so-called "science fiction" is not a defense of the "science" in this series. The show achieved ratings, but not because it was science fiction.

    1. Re:Insult to atheists everywhere by gatkinso · · Score: 0, Troll

      Who really cares about what the atheists think?

      Since life is finite, short, and insignificant (after all what is 70 or so years in the face of eons?), they themselves should accept the fact that nothing anyone does or says matters at all.

      So shut up and die already.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    2. Re:Insult to atheists everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a maroon.

      Any Christianity "pandering" is pretty darn thin, if not non-existent. There are religious overtones, yes, but they pulled from many religions.
       
      I'm hard pressed to point out anything specifically "Christian". Given that things pre-date Christ by about 148,000 years, it's not surprising.

    3. Re:Insult to atheists everywhere by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      You know, they did it just specifically to piss you off. If I were you, I'd write them a strongly worded letter.

    4. Re:Insult to atheists everywhere by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      Since you are very small, utmostly microscopically small, your opinion is of too little value for me to care.

    5. Re:Insult to atheists everywhere by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      I agree. I'm sure you noticed how the only atheist was Gaius Baltar, and how all the logical, scientific cylons were, of course, THE BAD GUYS.

      Not to mention "It was all God and he loves you!" was just plain bad deus ex machina-type storytelling. "We were... Angels the entire time!" What a satisfying explanation that is on a sci-fi show!

    6. Re:Insult to atheists everywhere by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Did you ever watch the original series? Did you think the visitors that made the colonials clothes turn white were just aliens?

    7. Re:Insult to atheists everywhere by macraig · · Score: 1

      I agree. I'm sure you noticed how....

      I didn't notice anything past those first few episodes, and that was how long ago? Unlike the other BG whiners, who complain about "all the spiritual crap" but kept watching anyway, I actually put my foot down and walked away. Sure, I feel like I missed out on something, but what I feel I missed is precisely what wasn't offered: real science fiction.

    8. Re:Insult to atheists everywhere by macraig · · Score: 1

      To use lawyer-speak, asked and answered already:

      I had issues with the original series for the same reason, even though I was still just a kid.

    9. Re:Insult to atheists everywhere by S-100 · · Score: 1

      If that's the case, atheists must be very easy to offend. Considering that atheists still make up a minority of the population, they should be very used to religious symbology used in the culture, even if they don't agree with it.

      Should a Christian be "insulted" by fairy tales that involve pixies and trolls, but leave out God? Maybe some would, but the sensible majority can separate fantasy entertainment from religious philosophy.

      And if it's any consolation to anti-christian atheists, the "god" in BSG wouldn't have made a very good substitute for the Judeo-Christian God. As stated in the finale, the BSG god is neither good nor evil - it's the people that are good or evil. That puts the BSG god a couple of notches below the "good God" most people recognize, and even lower than The Force...

  70. Yes, always-A God by any other name. by Ostracus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Given that God is all powerful and all knowing, it is ALWAYS a cop out to write him into a script."

    I'm sorry but is that the judo christian God, or the god that BSG actually used?

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
    1. Re:Yes, always-A God by any other name. by dstech · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I'm sorry but is that the judo christian God, or the god that BSG actually used?"

      I didn't know judo christians had a different god than regular christians! What belt do you have to earn before they tell you about judo christian god?

    2. Re:Yes, always-A God by any other name. by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

      the judo christian God

      Turning the other cheek is in fact a metaphor about using your opponent's force against him. Now it all makes sense.

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  71. This ends racism, as it creates one race... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was thinking just the opposite.

    Instead of all mankind deriving from some African tribe somewhere around the Olduvai and all men being derived from a common black eve, I though the series reconfirmed a more eurocentric view point that inferior backwards Africans were lifted up through the combination of a superior more advanced people.

    1. Re:This ends racism, as it creates one race... by Dasher42 · · Score: 1

      You know what's ironic? I bet you that the next 500 years of the Galactica timeline on earth would have been a tragic story of the white man's burden. Good intentions can't blunt greed but so much. Yeah, they'd really be colonials then!

  72. I for one liked the ending, however... by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    ...what about the two basestars that jumped away that the recce raptor filmed in Daybreak Pt 1?

    They just might be a tad pissed off. Not to mention fully armed.

    Other than that I thought it was a great tale, and the ending tied up most loose ends at least for me.

    Oh yeah, I *STILL* want to know who it was that Carprica Six was meeting at the beginning the the miniseries.

    I am such a huge fan of the series - and almost totally at peace with it coming to an end.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    1. Re:I for one liked the ending, however... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought about that too. The thing I'm wondering is if, when a basestar jumps, it sends a smaller ship ahead first to check to see if it's safe and then jump back. I don't think I've ever seen them do that in the show (although it would only make sense). Maybe for jumping into the middle of a super-dense asteroid field they would. If not, the next basestar to jump to the colony is going to annihilate itself, because the only explanation for the safe spot in the field is that the colony was keeping it clear somehow. After it went bye bye, the entire place turned into a deathtrap.

  73. The Fate of The Adamas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Teaches us that however good you are, however much cosmic karma you accrue saving humanity, you just get shafted without lube at the end.

  74. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  75. Re:Dissenting opinion: Jumped the shark then drown by AtomG · · Score: 1

    YES, finally something that makes sense! Also, the angels were hallucinations caused by alcohol withdrawal, and Kara actually dies of spontaneous combustion while Lee is off in dreamworld.

  76. Atheists are narrow-minded bigots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not a religious person in the slightest, but its weird how sci-fi can be full of aliens and "The Force" but some how the idea of God gets people up in arms.

    Well it is because atheists are narrow-minded bigots.
    And I say that as a devout Agnostic.

    Really go to any college or college town, watch how they act and talk. And watch like Jane Goodall watching the chimps.
    You will quickly come to the conclusion that they are angry hate filled individuals. They commit all the "sins" they accuse the Christians of, but on the other end of the political spectrum. The same self-righteousness tinged with narcissism.

    They are just bad people.

    1. Re:Atheists are narrow-minded bigots by Jaryn · · Score: 0

      uhm.

      that was really weird.

      atheists are all bad people, eh? and people who have university educations are full of anger and hate? what?

  77. Five resources too long by Ostracus · · Score: 1

    "Shit, I was sort of pissed that they had a bunch of steel lying around to repair Galactica -- reminded me of Voyager where every episode a new shuttlecraft would appear."

    It's not so outlandish when you consider just how resource rich space can be.

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
  78. BSG newbie by Eil · · Score: 1

    The wife and I just started watching BSG based on all the positive talk we've been hearing about it. We're on season 1, episode 7 or something.

    I have to say so far, it's a metric shitload better than Stargate. However, we have a couple of concerns. It seems the writers are being overly obtuse about things. I have no problem pondering plot twists and various character motives, but they're way too obvious about the fact that they're holding back 90% of the information about what's going on. For instance, they haven't yet told us what life was like before the cylons arrived, how they encountered humans in the first place, or what the fuck is going on with that Caprica place. I know that some of the history should remain hidden so as to exploit it in future episodes, but c'mon.

    Also, it seems like its taking an extremely long time to get to know the characters, even the "good guys". It's the first sci-fi show I've ever seen that instead of trying to immerse you in the story, deliberately keeps you at bay while spoon-feeding you tiny scraps of information at a time. Watching BSG is like overhearing an argument where you can only discern the occasional word clearly enough to get the faintest grasp of what the debate is about. When it's over, you're left unsure of what exactly transpired while wondering if you'll ever find out.

    1. Re:BSG newbie by Jaime2 · · Score: 1

      Any chance you didn't watch the four hour mini-series that preceeded season 1? If you have seen it and you still have those questions, then you won't really get any good examples of pre-war life on Caprica until the last few episodes of the last season. There will be a lot of scenes on post-war Caprica in season two.

    2. Re:BSG newbie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A) you need to watch the miniseries that preceded the first season.

      B) Enjoy. you may see lots of complaining about how the show degrades as time goes on, but even at it's weakest it is still one of best stories in a long while.

    3. Re:BSG newbie by Eil · · Score: 1

      Well that would explain it. I had no idea that a miniseries preceded it the series proper. I'll have to seek that out. Thanks!

  79. Didn't like Battle Star Galactica by zymano · · Score: 1

    Didn't like the look of it at all. Seemed really boring. The original BattleStar from the early 80's was great.

  80. So-- if you watched all the movies by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    Think about it-- if you watched all the movies in the order of Vader's lifetime why is it he NEVER takes a second look at c-3po?

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  81. What's Battlestar Galactica? by mqduck · · Score: 1

    Did I miss something?

    --
    Property is theft.
  82. How did slashdot manage to miss the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you all forget what site you're on?? This is about FOSS and documenting your code!

    They create an AI but they don't give their creations the ability to *view their own source*. They should have provided them with a properly licensed, well-documented, and easy-to-maintain hardware architecture, at least one kernal, and least one compiler (they would need some abstraction, the language would have to be "human-readable", after all). Also porn. With these *bare* necessities, the AI would have no reason to bug the humans anymore. Why would the AI choose to wage war if the humans provided them all of what they needed to keep developing themselves?

    At that point, you get to either Terminator or the Matrix, both of which show you how bright the future can be if only you let your self-aware programs keep developing themselves.

    The End.

  83. Not always? Always! by tomhudson · · Score: 0, Redundant

    God intervenes and causes everyone to lose every bit of rationality and common sense.

    That's the outcome all the time when you introduce God into a discussion.

    And, in this case, the ending is a "Deus ex machina" - a sure sign, going back to ancient greek theatre, of bad plot endings.

    1. Re:Not always? Always! by anagama · · Score: 1

      That's the outcome all the time when you introduce God into a discussion.

      Exactly. That's why it's so perfect. ;-)

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  84. Re:So-- if you watched all the movies by Your.Master · · Score: 1

    Because the droids all look the same. Even in A New Hope there were a tonne of silver versions of C-3PO that were otherwise identical.

    Not that C-3PO's presence in the new trilogy didn't bother me (R2-D2 was fine because he was supposed to already be aware of Obi-Wan and where he lives, etc.).

  85. How did slashdot manage to miss the point? by derGoldstein · · Score: 1

    Did you all forget what site you're on?? This is about FOSS and documenting your code!

    They create an AI but they don't give their creations the ability to *view their own source*. They should have provided them with a properly licensed, well-documented, and easy-to-maintain hardware architecture, at least one kernal, and least one compiler (they would need some abstraction, the language would have to be "human-readable", after all). Also porn. With these *bare* necessities, the AI would have no reason to bug the humans anymore. Why would the AI choose to wage war if the humans provided them all of what they needed to keep developing themselves?

    At that point, you get to either Terminator or the Matrix, both of which show you how bright the future can be if only you let your self-aware programs keep developing themselves.

    The End.

    (sorry for double-posting, but this brilliant piece of punditry is mine and mine alone. And I was stupid enough to click the "Post Anonymously" box as I Alt-ed through the form. I realize that this says a lot about my mental health.)

    --
    Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
  86. Easter Egg? by Zumbs · · Score: 1

    In the final episode the fleet settle on Earth, without their technology. The early humans had just evolved, and they possibly interbred with with the native humans. This sounds an awful lot like in "The Hitchhikers Guide to the Universe", where a fleet of hair dressers and phone cleaners fall to Earth at a similar stage of human evolution and make a life there. That fleet, however, decided to use leaves as currency, and the native population seemed to die out. But who knows?

    Well, it's probably not an easter egg, but it is a little funny.

    --
    The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
  87. Actually fourth explanation by eclectro · · Score: 1

    It was Bob Cylon that did it all. Even though BSG is gone now, at least we still have Bob to explain things.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  88. It looked great. by wonkavader · · Score: 1

    It looked great. It's just that it was crap. Yes the original was great, but you just cannot argue that the new, crappy, preachy, god heavy, mamby-pamby new one didn't look good. It looked great. It's just that it was a complete waste of time.

    The Cylons in the old series looked like teamsters, which they probably were, complete with metallic pot-belly. The lumbered around and couldn't shoot straight and fell over comically when they exploded. It was silly how low-tech it was. It looks horribly unmodern compared to the annoying, preachy, ultimately vapid new one.

    The characters in the old one were simple, the dialog trivial, the ideas tidy. Who can possibly argue that the new version, with its complex dialog and story, deep characters, no clear good guy or bad, was not much more modern and splashy? Who cared if it made for a pointless series that left us feeling unsatisfied at every turn?

    In the old one, Starbuck wound up stranded on a planet with a Cylon and they came to depend on each other. How naive of them to think that that was one simple show which could have a beginning and an end, some conflict and some resolution. The new series showed us that that little episode was really the whole series!

    Incompetent old Galactic makers. They didn't realize that it's not good enough to make an episodic badguy vs. goodguy show. There are no good guys, after all. Thank goodness the new BSG showed us that.

    The contrast between the theme music kinda summarized the whole difference. The original BSG got you roused up for some adventure. The new one prepped you for a long, LONG nap. At least it's now over.

    1. Re:It looked great. by zymano · · Score: 1

      i like my robots to look like robots.

  89. Re:Didn't like Battle Star Galactica by master_p · · Score: 1

    I couldn't agree more! the original was FUN. This new BSG takes itself too seriously!

  90. Ended 2 years too late. M Knight S. writing it? by guidryp · · Score: 1

    This was my favorite show until the end of the second season where they went through the looking glass (New Caprica) and never returned. I was stunned by the flash forward episode where none of the characters made any sense (and pretty much haven't since). It was like a bad parody of evil opposite universe from Star Trek - Adama with a mustache, Apollo in the fat suit, Starbuck grew a lot of hair (or extensions) and they all seemed completely out character, the show has felt like a surreal mess since, when the hard boiled realism of the first two seasons are what drew me to it.

    From then on I think the initial success went to their heads and they went more grandiose/artsy with each episode, with terrible results. Here is where I see Parallel with M Knight Shamalan, letting success then attempting to produce self aggrandizing artsy drek as favorable press goes to your head. Fitting that he gave himself a cameo in the end.

    We then had two seasons of pushing characters in completely unbelievable directions, Captain one day, mutineer the next, president the next, spin and repeat. The fleet goes into bloody civil war just from the thought of allying with the Cylons, then they volunteer to go on a suicide mission to rescue one half cyclon kid. All the other plot elements all made up as they went that could never have a satisfying end.

    Then we got the cop out "God/super being did it all" explanation for anything. Yes during the last two seasons they laid it on thick but unfortunately I was still hoping against hope for a return of the show that was the first two seasons, hoping for some redemption. Back in Season 1&2 when it was still good and my friends used to discuss it. Baltars Head-6 was insanity or implanted technology, there was ZERO discussion of angles and god pulling all the strings. Basically because such an explanation is completely lacking in imagination and satisfaction.

    Once you go down that road, you can do practically anything you want with no need for anything to have any logical reason behind it. Music activating the Final 5; God did it. Visions in peoples heads; God did it. Starbuck back from the dead; God did it. Empty Raptor launching missiles and destroying the whole giant Cylon Colony; God did it. etc... Once you go down this road, logic is out the window. God becomes the ultimate non explanation for everything. Blah.

    The utterly ridiculous final act of jettisoning all technology into the sun is in keeping with the mess that has been season 3 and 4. Whatever the plot element is we want this week, the characters will nonsensically jump through any hoop to make it happen. Since they wanted this to be our past, so all that pesky technology had to go. Simple toss it into the sun. So what if it make no sense at all. It serves our cutesy ending.

    Summary: Two great initial season driven by hard edged realism, sane plots, believably characters. Then two season of grandiose wacky plots, mysteries that weren't and unbelievable characters. The finale was just more of the same final two seasons that fed into it. Too bad it didn't end two years ago when it still could have had a satisfying end.

  91. NO. NOT NOW. NOT EVER. I'M COMING FOR ALL OF YOU! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally, the last reason to subscribe to cable has resolved itself!

  92. Thank God that's over by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Now let's let Caprica die a quiet death and we'll finally be able to put this whole thing behind us.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  93. all those spacecraft by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    all those ships- none could be a phillip morris/seagrams cargo ship?

    a vehicle with the capacity to deliever cancer sticks in a quantity sufficient to supply a planet can certainly supply that limited population for 4 years... (they'd get kinda stale though)

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  94. I liked it by Brazilian+Geek · · Score: 1

    As has been said, it was an emotional ending.

    Its plot may have been weak and some promised answers never came but I feel good that it's over now and I got to see my favorite characters reach a place to call home.

    I know I'm not the only one that feels this way but an ending that wraps up a voyage as long as Galactica's with humanity surviving is quite nice.

    --
    All browsers' default homepage should read: Don't Panic...
  95. Bring on the /. meme! by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    have you ever utterly restored a car?

    from junk to cherry?
    something like a VW ghia?
    then sold it?

    for the rest of your life, if you catch the sign of that model vehicle you'll be checking it out and wondering

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:Bring on the /. meme! by rworne · · Score: 1

      Yes, but we are talking C-3PO here. The Toyota Camry of the droid world.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    2. Re:Bring on the /. meme! by vishbar · · Score: 1

      Hey, I like my Camry. It doesn't bitch and moan like C3PO did.

      --
      Ride the skies
  96. 150,000 ... very long cycle by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    are we to assume other cycles were similarly spaced?

    Really, they jumped the shark a few too many times and did a SF board fan end instead of a sci fi fanatic end

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  97. Deus without the ex machina by Cormophyte · · Score: 1

    If you've read this thread you've been spoiled already, but out of politeness I'll just say that there's spoilers following)

    I've read a lot of posts and articles in which people are debating the validity of the choice to explain everything as being god's work. I never thought that way myself, but because you could make a halfway decent argument for that point of view I've done some thinking into the best way to explain why it's not a copout and I think I've come up with a pretty good one.

    Through prophecy and the guidance of the show's God they're led to a ruined earth. Whether or not God intended it to be ruined when they found it or not can be debated right up until the point in the last episode at which point they find Earth2. When it becomes apparent that God intended the whole time for them to end their journey at Earth2 (because Kara's song is what led them there) it makes the discovery of a devastated Earth2 part of the process of getting there. More specifically, it turns Earth1 into a lesson. It makes it a meaningful example on the way to understanding what produced the destruction of their entire civilization this means God has a purpose in leading them on this convoluted path through genocide and oppression and heartache. Even at its most passive the purpose for God's journey must be to teach humanity that lesson.

    This purpose gives the God real substance and character and it's this character that takes God from some convenient force that can be used to explain anything and everything and incorporates it into the plot in a legitimate way. This makes the lack of an explanation for what specifically Kara is or what the Head 6 and Head Gaius are ok. It's unimportant to the plot. All the story needs is enough explanation of what they are to show that they really were tools of the character which is God, and that was accomplished. This also legitimizes the spirituality of the story, because that is the story. It's a story of what God put mankind through in order to give them a chance to be better.

    Just my two cents, and it reaches just a little bit, but there it is.

  98. Sci Fi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So instead of Science Fiction, it turned out to be Religious Fiction. I feel kinda cheated.

    1. Re:Sci Fi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet: Spiritual Fiction. Spi-Fi.

    2. Re:Sci Fi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet: Spiritual Fiction. Spi-Fi.

      I think you mean SpyFy

  99. Do, a deer, a female deer by Dasher42 · · Score: 1

    The show ended too soon. I was waiting for the episode where Kara Thrace gets taken off duty and sent to a ship where a retired captain lives with his twelve children, only he still acts like a captain and hard-heartedly marches his children about like they're officers, but then, Kara teaches them all to sing.

  100. Lampshade Hanging by pcgabe · · Score: 1

    It was handled by one sentence: 'It's surprising there was no dissension' -- it sure is!

    This is a technique called Lampshade Hanging. Here is a recent Dinosaur Comics about it.

    I really wanted to like the finale, but this ruined it. I could no longer identify with the characters.

    Abandon all technology? Frak. That. Felgercarb.

    --
    Don't put advice in your sig.
  101. Re:Dissenting opinion: Jumped the shark then drown by servognome · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Perhaps they should recall that our ancestors lived short, brutal lives, and they grew up with the skills to survive in that environment; our heroes have no idea how to hunt a buffalo with a spear, clean it, skin it, and preserve the meat for the winter. Just think of this little inconvenience: No salt, no pepper, no spices; no vitamins! When the first drought -- or the locusts, or neighboring tribe or a pack of baboons -- comes and they run out of food, and half of them die off, it won't seem like such a good idea. When people start dying from simple infections because there are no antibiotics, when women start dying in childbirth, when most children don't survive to adulthood, when the leading killer becomes starvation instead of obesity, they may remember the benefits of technology. Sure, we can close our eyes to all these problems, but couldn't the writers have made an effort to tell a story with some plausibility?

    Remember the lives they lived aboard the ships. Almost half of the original survivors were dead. Civilians lived in castes tied to their ship and essentially powerless about their destiny. They lived as prisoners of technology. After a few years of that existence, many average people would like to return to a simpler life. To be truly free and farm, fish, feel the grass on their feet and warmth of the sun.
    Such rejection of technology is not unprecedented.

    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  102. That is "Intelligent Design". by khasim · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Congratulations, you've just managed to support Intelligent Design.

    It doesn't matter how the characters acted. That's a whole different thread.

    In that story, human beings as we know them today are NOT a product of millions of years of evolution. They're the result of some "god" who directly influences events. And who is, apparently, still involved today.

    Which is even worse than the age old cliche "and we will call this new planet 'Earth'".

    1. Re:That is "Intelligent Design". by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      I was talking about the storyline to a fictional TV show in which an off-screen God was very clearly involved throughout, and about which some conclusions were presently quite clearly. There are countless works of fiction that explain the story of man in an allegorical fashion, with the intent of inspiring better interpersonal behavior. Often a God, or many Gods are involved and contrary to some conclusions presented here, many of the stories stand on their own quite well, often as major influences to modern literature.

      Because it is fashionable, particularly in the science fiction crowd, particularly on slashdot, to be rabid atheists, I think there's a reaction against the ending that is misdirected. The ending to the show was flawed in my opinion, primarily due to execution. While Baltar may have been ready to accept divine influence, I think the writers were not prepared that the audience was not, and even for those of us that were, we did not feel the sense of inspiration that the characters were feeling. I think that is a valid and harsh criticism of the finale.

      Any belief or lack of belief in a "real life" God or Gods that I might have is not presented here. If I had a belief in God, I may have been offended by the portrayal of him in this show as being substantially more indifferent, even callous than the Judeo-Christian interpretation. At least if I allowed myself to blur the lines between fantasy and reality as you are suggesting.

    2. Re:That is "Intelligent Design". by genner · · Score: 1

      Which is even worse than the age old cliche "and we will call this new planet 'Earth'".

      They should have called it Larry and after a billion years of evolution it became Earth.

    3. Re:That is "Intelligent Design". by Duffy13 · · Score: 1

      Actually according to "that story" they are. The characters specifically mention the odds of two identical/genetically compatible races evolving on separate planets.

      Believe it or not Roman Catholics actually support evolution (along with several other denominations). While they may still believe other less scientific ideas; at least they acknowledge ideas outside of their faith. You could argue that they essentially are no different from any other philosophical group, they just have a slightly different claim on why they are right. Stop focusing on the outlaying nut jobs; the same could be done for whatever groups you identify with.

      If you want to slam different ideals that's fine, but aim your arguments correctly and don't exclude/include groups indiscriminately.

      --
      "Now you know, and knowing is half the battle!"
    4. Re:That is "Intelligent Design". by sonicmerlin · · Score: 1

      Man... this guy is awesome. Someone mod him up.

  103. another ending they considered by pimproot · · Score: 1

    "Eddie kept pitching me that they come to Earth in contemporary times, and everyone's cheering and happy, and cut to the White House and the President goes, "Nuke 'em!" And they destroy Galactica -- cut to credits." -- Ron Moore at http://www.nj.com/entertainment/tv/index.ssf/2009/03/battlestar_galactica_ronald_d.html

    haha. hahahaha.

  104. They were off by a magnitude by servognome · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Sorry for the second reply, but the more I think about it the less I like the 150,000 years and really wish it had been 10,000 years

    Take the smartest most adept computer engineer in the world, put him/her out in the woods with a set of clothes, a tent, and a pocket knife. Call me when he returns with a functioning computer.

    A good computer engineer would come up with something like an abacus, simple enough to make with his tech and useful for the types of problems they would face.

    The more I think about what the colonials would have brought in their heads, the more I think early civilization would have made the perfect landing time.
    They would have brought the ideas of Farming, writing, math, building houses, organization, etc. all of which occur around the same time period.
    It also would have been easier for them to approach and interbreed with earthlings who were at nearly the same stage of technological development.

    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    1. Re:They were off by a magnitude by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the second reply, but the more I think about it the less I like the 150,000 years and really wish it had been 10,000 years

      Except that "mitochondrial Eve" lived more like 150,000 years ago than 10,000. So once you decide that Hera is her, the time is fixed.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    2. Re:They were off by a magnitude by servognome · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately they overplayed the significance of "mitochondiral Eve" to set a time which doesn't make as much sense.
      There would likely be an older "Eve" from the earthling side of the family, not to mention Athena would be "Eve" if they found her remains.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  105. Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Piece of Shit

  106. Our ancestors.. by Leuf · · Score: 3, Funny

    On the verge of being wiped out after a terribly harsh winter, our ancestors came across thirty thousand tasty colonists that tried to make friends with them.

  107. *vomits* Thank god that horrible ride is over.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hated this show with a passion. It was just one moody exchange after another, like everyone was PMSing. And, they acted like there was deep meaning in every show, hint: there wasn't. Most of it didn't make sense and I was always left with a feeling of, "I don't care," after attempting to watch an episode objectively. This and Lost were two of the worst shows I have ever seen.

    I don't think the newer BSG did justice to the old BSG. The old one had style/class/humor/swashbuckling heroes with a purpose/episodes made sense/the combat scenes were good/the dialogue was good. And, yet, the new BSG is more popular than God and the old one got cancelled. It is a damn shame that people lack taste.

  108. Deus Ex Machina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Deus Ex Machina translates to "god from the machine". Perhaps that was the point? :P

  109. NFTLA by nsaspook · · Score: 1

    "They can take my FTL starship from my cold dead hands."
    Founding member 148,000BC

      Stupid Fraking Ending.

    --
    In GOD we trust, all others we monitor.
  110. Won't somebody think of the robots? by vampiress · · Score: 1

    Robots need love and attention too. But seriously, the only thing I had issues with was making it with a cave person to ensure the survival of humanity. I mean come on... how gross is that? *shudder*

    --
    -=VampiressX=-
  111. RDM == ? by JackassJedi · · Score: 1

    Random Deus ex Machina?
    Oh he's gonna hate me for that one.

    --
    Power corrupts the few, while weakness corrupts the many.
  112. anoymous coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The hand of god...cyclic repetitions of man's existence...angels...forsaking tech and going back to primitive existence...thought I was gonna puke. An hour of rapid cut CGI battle followed by ridiculous coincidence and intelligent design stupidity was NOT how this entertaining and thoughtful series should have ended. I suggest the writers follow Cavil's mode of exodus. I watched it...I feel dirty. You'll find me naked and weeping in the corner of my shower.

  113. Sundiving by dfsmith · · Score: 1

    So you think that perhaps a depressed Centurian teleported from Galactica after a black light on a black (and very grubby) console lit up in black with the message against a black background that you'd just pressed it. Or are you implying that Sam was spending a year dead for "tax reasons"? Man, I'd like to have been 300 feet below that concert in a reinforced concrete bunker!

  114. Thought it was "destruction of the fleet" by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Don't see a fleet anymore, now do you?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  115. Re:Dissenting opinion: Jumped the shark then drown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You, along with many other people, are assuming they are left with absolutely NO technology. It was shown they retained plenty of things, binoculars, maps, guns.. you can bet your ass they carried as much as they could that didn't constitute *advanced* technology.

    As for medicine and food, they were running out of medicine and food in the FLEET, if you didn't notice the issue of extremely sparse rations throughout the season. What makes you think continuing to be nearly out of algae-food constantly would be better than an entire planet full of fruit, vegetables and meat?

    And how much medicine do you think they would be able to produce themselves on Galactica, and for how long? They were very self-sufficient for a very long time, but they can only hold up so long- they're not a fully-equipped society up there.

  116. Spoilers by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    In the writers' room:

    "OK, so Starbuck is a ghost. And so is the Viper she flew back, except people can touch it. Oh, and the 'red dress' Caprica Six who appears to Baltar? Yeah, she's not his subconscious or a figment of his imagination or anything like that. She's an angel. So is the Baltar who appears to the real Caprica Six. Also Jesus did it. And because Jesus did it, we don't have to explain the aboriginal humans on some backwater planet even slightly."

    "Ron, are you fucking high?"

    "Yes. Yes I am."

  117. About "Earth"... by hummassa · · Score: 1

    Who tought of that name anyway? Yeah, we have a planet, let's call it "dust", or "dirt". Yuck. We can call it Vulcan (because it has a lot of vulcans, you know, and it had even more so times before) or "The Blue Jewel", or "Water drop", but no, we called it "Dirt".

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:About "Earth"... by TommydCat · · Score: 1

      And here I thought we named the planet "Earth" because of all the Earthlings that roam around on it...

      --
      This comment does not necessarily represent the views and opinions of the author.
  118. Re:Loved almost everything but the shaky camera wo by Noburo23 · · Score: 1

    I wish I had mod points today. Die, jerky-cam, die!

  119. BSG an epic fail by vacuum_tuber · · Score: 1

    BSG was a total bust and the end was unbelievably bad. For the effort invested in it, BSG might even be the most epic fail in the history of TV.

    BSG wasn't sci-fi... it was a soap opera against a little-used space background. Anytime I tuned in it was just like a daytime soap.

    I think they got way too full of themselves and lost all perspective. I saw a documentary about the show and couldn't believe the extent to which they patted themselves on their backs while an objective look at the production revealed it to be a mess of a dreary soap opera -- all talk and little action.

    And any series that has to resort to promos like "All will be revealed" or "All will be explained" has clearly overcomplicated itself to the point where it can't be understood.

    --
    Look at the bright side: there's always seppuku.
  120. BHP by DoChEx · · Score: 1

    Battle House on the Prairie, the next chapter in BSG.

  121. Re:Dissenting opinion: Jumped the shark then drown by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

    While it may be an unpopular opinion on this thread I think that the writers were not entirely wrong in their decision to have the remaining humans abandon the technology that had kept them alive throughout the series and ultimately delivered them to the Sol system. Recall, that throughout the series the Galactica and the surviving fleet were always attempting to scavange and repair their degrading technologies, usually just a few steps ahead of a catastrophic failure or two. The running down of the previous civilization and the technologies that made the Galactica and the fleet possible was a constant running theme, even though it wasn't always addressed explicitly. The 30,000 or so surving humans of the Galactica fleet did not have the necessary skills, knowledge, or materials to continue operating indefinitely. In fact, when the Galactica did reach Earth it was heavily damaged from its latest encounter with the Cavil and with the fold drive completely shot the Galactica, or what was left of it anyway, wasn't going to leave the Sol system for a long time if indeed it ever would again.

    It was practically inevitable, even if all 30,000 had agreed to settle together and carefully husband, maintain, and pass down all of their collected technical knowledge and the remaining equipment that much of that knowledge and equipment would be lost in the following centuries as the remaining Galactica technology ran down to broken and the comforts of the previous civilization began to fade into a more primitive and agrarian society of descendents on Earth.

    The truth of the matter is that without an advanced civilization and population in the millions to support it on at least one fully developed colony planet, the Galactica and the technology that made everything work was impossible to maintain indefinitely. There were perhaps some minor details that the writers could have done a bit better, but the decision to abandon the Galactica and the remaining fleet was not an entirely illogical one given the state of the Galactica and the remaining equipment (and its penchant for attracting the Cylons from far and wide). It is also important to remember that as the series continued it became more and more apparent that technology was not "the answer" to the problems of humanity (i.e. something to be pursued as an end unto itself). Recall that it was technology that brought them the Cylons and put them on the path into their present circumstances; so is the decision to "start again" so completely illogical in the context of all that they had been through and the state of their remaining technology when they finally arived at Earth? Maybe not.

  122. Re:Dissenting opinion: Jumped the shark then drown by OhJeeves · · Score: 1

    > blah blah blah

    Have you read the title versus that of the original? "Battlestar Galactica Re-Imagined". This is not your Mommy and Daddy's BSG.

  123. Except that the Colonists weren't alone by name_already_taken · · Score: 1

    The natives were also her contemporaries.

    So, it is possible that all the Colonists except Hera die off quickly, but it's not necessary.

    Hera's hybrid biology must have represented an evolutionary advantage in order for her mitochondrial DNA to be successfully passed down over 150,000 years to modern humans.

    It is possible that that advantage would not be realized until many generations later - for example if a hundred generations later, her descendants are the only people who have resistance to some new disease they encounter, and everyone else who does not posses her mitochondrial DNA dies from the plague.

    It does seem likely that most of the Colonists die off quickly or have little impact on the native peoples in terms of culture.

    Think about it - if 150,000 years ago farming and things like that had been introduced and it had actually taken, isn't it likely that mankind would be a lot more advanced now? We might have had an industrial revolution 100,000 years ago instead of 150 years ago.

    Certainly, the introduction of language in addition to farming would have been a huge cultural leap over the existing hunter-gatherer lifestyle.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    1. Re:Except that the Colonists weren't alone by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

      Certainly, the introduction of language in addition to farming would have been a huge cultural leap over the existing hunter-gatherer lifestyle.

      Hunter gatherers don't have language already?

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  124. Ties to original series by crndg · · Score: 1

    First, I also didn't like the way they glossed over the fleet's unanimous decision to forgo all technology. And I wished for a better ending for Starbuck. How about, now that her destiny is complete, she is free to be the human she should have been all along?

    But when they showed up in the past, I started flashing back ("Lost" style) to the old series, and the introductory narration:

    "There are those who believe that life here began out there, far across the universe, with tribes of humans who may have been the forefathers of the Egyptians, or the Toltecs, or the Mayans. That they may have been the architects of the great pyramids, or the lost civilizations of Lemuria or Atlantis. Some believe that there may yet be brothers of man who even now fight to survive somewhere beyond the heavens..." --(thanks, Wikipedia!)

    So in a way they tied the new show back to that idea (sort of). Plus, remember the big white crystal ships, and the cool white uniformed Starbuck and Apollo? There was an advanced race that was sort of looking out for the fleet.

    When Kara found her dead body on Old Earth, the writers had so many options open to them. We knew the old occupants had resurrection technology. Maybe they didn't all die out, and there was an advanced colony hidden somewhere nearby. And their resurrection tech is so advanced, it even works on humans (and vipers!). I mean, someone built her factory fresh spaceship!

    Other random thoughts:

    Why wouldn't Adm Adama come back after burying Laura? Why wouldn't he want to be near his family after suffering a loss like that? And how would Lee "know" that his father was going to go all hermit on everyone?

    What was the Cylons "Plan?" Yes, I know there's another movie coming out to explain that, but we spent the first 2 or 3 seasons being told "And they have a plan," only to have said plan kind of fizzle out. At first it seemed they wanted there to be survivors, so they could experiment with making hybrid babies, or learning about emotions, or teaching the humans to say "Oh my god" instead of "Oh my gods." But by the end, they were just as lost as the humans. "And they have a plan" was brilliant as a way of making the Cylons into a truly terrifying enemy who is always going to be one step ahead of you, and making you second-guess every decision. But it turned out to be just a cool line.

    The world has changed a lot since the miniseries. The events of 9/11/2001 (quick aside, do people in other countries refer to it as 11/9?) no longer haunt us the way they did back then. The reign of King Dubya is over, and we will be dealing with the fallout for years/decades to come. It would have been nice to see that reflected in the finale more, with more emphasis on humans and Cylons putting aside their differences and working together to dig themselves out of the hole they have created. (But I know the show finished production long before last year's election.)

    On the whole, it was a fun ride, and the ending fell a little flat. I'm grateful the ending wasn't so bad that it will sour my memory of the show's earlier glories. (Remember Galactica jumping into the atmosphere of New Caprica? Remember Pegasus ramming the Base Stars? Remember Boomer showing up with the Cylons at the end of the miniseries? Remember Starbuck always ending up in the brig? Remember Lee and Kara's attraction even though--or because--they were totally wrong for each other? Remember Starbuck waggling the Raider's wings? Good times!)

  125. Re:Dissenting opinion: Jumped the shark then drown by imgod2u · · Score: 1

    You act like the conditions onboard the ships were caused by technology. They were not. They were caused by living on a frakking ship.

    It's like saying that living in a submarine is hell compared to living on land because nuclear power exists. It's Faustian-level ignorance.

    But then again, the village mob always went after Frankenstein's monster, not the good Doctor.

  126. Re:Ended 2 years too late. M Knight S. writing it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once you go down that road, you can do practically anything you want with no need for anything to have any logical reason behind it. Music activating the Final 5; God did it. Visions in peoples heads; God did it. Starbuck back from the dead; God did it. Empty Raptor launching missiles and destroying the whole giant Cylon Colony; God did it. etc... Once you go down this road, logic is out the window. God becomes the ultimate non explanation for everything. Blah.

    Not trying to be a troll here, but honestly, that's how a lot of people DO see the world... God seems to be an answer to everyting. It makes just as unsatisfying a real life as it did a plot element in the show. Too bad most people would never notice that themselves cuz their God-head would punish em.

  127. BSG reimagined reimagined by rakerman · · Score: 1

    I disliked the conclusion so much that I had to reimagine it in a different context, with a different ending, in order to accept it.

    http://manifestomultilinko.blogspot.com/2009/03/bsg-finale-answer-to-question-we-didnt.html

  128. My Rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Okay, I have to vent. SPOILER ALERT!

    The writers should be sent home in shame. They should not be allowed to ever write again. These people have taken one of the best shows on television and thoroughly and completely destroyed it.

    This episode was the dumbest thing I've ever seen. Where to start?? History. After 2 excellent seasons, the show began its nose dive. They killed Starbuck. Why? No reason! Just for the fuck of it! And then they had to deal with that dumb-ass move the rest of the season. And for episode after episode leading up to the finale, they taunt us with "what happened? is she alive? is she dead? find out in the finale!" and guess what? They had no idea what to do! So they just pretended it didnt happen and had her disappear! She turned into a fucking angel or some dumb shit and disappeared into thin air!

    What is this entire plot, too? For no reason, everybody starts believing that Hera is the only hope of both cyclons and humankind. FOR NO REASON! Nobody has any explanation as to why they all suddenly believe this. They just do. For plot! And the entire plot of the last 4 hours of the show revolve around this nonsensical assertation. In the end, they rescue her, and does she do anything special at all? NO! Nothing! Then she's called Eve? What, did everybody else become sterile and did she mate with a thousand aborigines?!?! What the hell sense does that make?

    Then they decided that the robotic military cylons had "earned their freedom" and they set them free with their own base ship! Everybody agreed! Nobody could see the possibility at all that cylons could come back to do them any harm. I mean, why would they? Cylons only destroyed 12 worlds and almost every last living human. But these? They're not going to hurt us. MY GOD. So they shoo their great enemy away and destroy all their own technology so that they can only defend themselves with sticks. Writing this bad should be considered a crime. Seriously.

    Why did they have to bring back the loserest character ever written - that smarmy douche with sunglasses who somehow has the power to sway the minds of everyone on the ship. That absolute loser star of the episode when Lee decides he needs to become a LAWYER for fuck's sake and defend this great traitor AT ANY COST. Yeah, that made sense. And then they bring this asshole sunglasses douche back and suddenly, HE'S THE FUCKING PRESIDENT! After seasons full of the entire fleet fighting over who gets to lead, Lee just says "Congrats, you're the president for no fucking reason." Right then, I turned off the show and turned off the TV. Could it get any dumber?

    YES! Probably the stupidest moment of all is when Lee goes "hey, I have an idea! Let's just throw all our technology away and live in dirt huts!" and the douche president later says "I was surprised everyone agreed to it." YEAH, ME TOO. So nobody at all had a brain. None of the 35,000 people thought that maybe throwing away all their resources to live on a completely unknown planet was a bad idea. No, apparently not. The first virus would have wiped them out. They didn't know if ANYTHING there was edible. They didn't have tools or seeds or anything! They had a stick. They had one stick and they were going to build a civilization with it. But not working together - oh no. They're going to spread out all over, one person per 100,000 miles, and each one is going to find a stick and cultivate crops and build a house and town with it. EVERYONE AGREED!

    And what of this stupid song and the stupid notes that imaginary Kara was obsessing over. Never explained! What, somehow her dad knew that someday she'd be on a Battlestar and need the coordinates to a planet? Is that what we're supposed to believe? Not to mention, how could an interstellar location be converted into a single 10 digit number? What in the hell???

    And what was the purpose of this big long opera house garbage? Nothing! All these dumb visions and years later it sort of reminds them of this scene that plays out? What the hell? Why did they bother us with all that?

    My god, I'm just so amazed that this got past anyone in production. I'd have tore this script up and fired the lot of them.

  129. See the Orange Catholic Bible by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

    "Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind."

    --
    Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  130. Re:My ending is better... And, have we a plan? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    After reading almost 3/4 of the leve 4 & 5 comments, I am going to jump in here.

    I think that while the writers (may have) dropped the ball with plot holes, there is an opportunity to (if everyone was not totally truthful about moving on) have yet a few more episodes or a series revival. Well, that is, if Galactica is not cannibalized, and assuming another battlestar appeared after 5 years of being lost (a la Voyager returning to Federation space). This idea also assumes the surviving characters look fit enough to lead a new fight against the stray, fight-seeking Cylons still out in deep space.

    If there is another BSG that is ancillary to "Caprica", hopefully they're physically fit, and not, say, geriatrics, as in ST's movies. The only reason to go see most of the Trek movies was to constantly see K/S/M and virtually not one major Scotty, Uhura, Chekov, et al sub plot of significance.

    Don't get me wrong. I LIKE Trek, and watched it for the first time around 1970 (around age 5), then picked it up again around 1972, then continued watching over and over from 74 to 84, and resumed (after the USN) from 88-2002. I felt that TNG's ending was just unfulfilling. I felt sad at the end of DS 9. Voyager was OK, but i was disappointed that Harry Kim's promotion was really (to me) an alternate time line, and it nullified Kim's promotion/rank in the "real" Voyager timeline, and i begrudged the staff for allowing that. Enterprise was OK, tho I only saw maybe 1/2 of the episodes, and absolutely DESPISED that theme song (the only time i was spared of it was the Tholian episode, IIRC, or whichever one started in another timeline and thus, gratefully happy i was, obviated that song being sang... it sounded way too damned manifest destinest to me...). But, overall, while I was a core fan, bought ship blueprints, star charts/maps, more than 30 novels, numerous tech manuals, a script book, Trek compendiums/encyclopedias, once i started watching BSG, Trek went from 150 (on a scale of 0-100) to maybe 70 or 80. BSG (at least the miniseries, seasons 1 & 2, and some of 3) was suddenly **200**, on that same scale, mainly because it didn't pussyfoot around or get too cerebral, techno-babbly, or moralistic in the Trek way. It did so in it's own, deeper-character-exposition way. Trek thus was second, with Voyager, DS9, TNG, then Ent, then TOS...

    Finally, the blessing of BSG is that it did NOT allow for some Homer/Kirk/Spock/McCoy triad to hijack the beauty in pursuing understanding supporting characters. Too many hollywood actions pin budgets on a handful of principal characters/actors, and big-ass ego trips undercut the others (Nichols, and IIRC, Takei, and Koenig wrote memoires about how shatner took the shooting scripts and redacted or stole lines from other characters, to give himself more screen time. Nimoy essentially supposedly did the same, but not as egomanically as shatner...), and it is egregious when so much money is put into a production and the others end up as foils or backdrop.

    A lesson Moore and company should learn, however, is that when a show like BSG arrives and is lambasted as rudderless, they may need to fire the lawyers (or gag/strap them a few weeks) and "pseudo crowd-source" with disclaimers (wait, they already HAVE that power, in law) and just borrow from the audience to keep it happy. The mini-series and seasons 1 & 2 are highly regarded by most followers, but 3 & 4 went on the drift, so it would have been humbling and rewarding if 3rd and 4th rails were set up to keep the writers in line AND the audiences happy. But, even i, (if i ever create something) would not want to lose total property control (hence, i'd likely NEVER sell to a studio, and will crowdsource if i have to), and would distribute via the Internet(s) and use talent not afraid of nor controllable by hwood, and no egomaniacal or candy-ass pretty boy/girl talent capable of walking off the set and destroying the production.

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  131. Not Disappointed by GloBug · · Score: 1

    I honestly thought the finale was pretty fitting. I didn't really have too many problems with it. I was more worried they were going to kill every one off or just leave them lost in space. I thought it was interesting that they ended up being what present day Earth believed to be the beginning of civilization. This whole time I was thinking they were going to find Earth already in present day or the furture. I was expecting it to 150,000 years in the past. I found it to be interesting and did just what it should do which was to make people think about what was happening. The whole point of leaving technology behind is to leave behind the very thing that brought on their war in the first place. It was about starting OVER with a clean slate and a new life. The only part I really didn't feel was explained well enough was how Hera was the key to their survival, because it seemed more like Kara was the key. Even with Hera being the mitochondrial Eve, you're telling me the some 38+K survivors left and all the cylons that stayed on Earth didn't procreate and help re-populize the planet. That really made no sense to me. Otherwise, I was generally please with the ending.

    1. Re:Not Disappointed by rndmtim · · Score: 1

      They never said Hera was the only common ancestor... she couldn't reproduce asexually. Only that she had some common DNA that all future humans share. It might have made more sense to put her back only 40 or 50k years tho, and explain the cro-magnon/neanderthal thing. Of course that does imply that all of the happy survivors who landed in Australia and North and South America are basically screwed in the long run. Oh yeah, and this puts them down in the middle of an ice age. Ooops. Could be why all of the other mini-colonies don't make it...

  132. pretty silly by speedtux · · Score: 1

    The ending made it look like living in Africa was going to be one big camping trip. These people don't stand a chance against carnivores, disease, or spear-wielding natives. I seriously doubt this was a realistic voluntary choice.

  133. agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen this path traveled before.

    DS9.

  134. Re:Dissenting opinion: Jumped the shark then drown by chromatic · · Score: 1

    It was practically inevitable, even if all 30,000 had agreed to settle together and carefully husband, maintain, and pass down all of their collected technical knowledge and the remaining equipment that much of that knowledge and equipment would be lost in the following centuries....

    That makes little sense. The New Caprica storyline showed that Colonials were exceedingly bad at long-term thinking. That was the point of the vote to colonize New Caprica. Sure, it was a lousy, inhospitable place suitable only for subsistence farming, but at least they could have land under their feet and sky overhead, even if they all starved to death later.

    It is also important to remember that as the series continued it became more and more apparent that technology was not "the answer" to the problems of humanity....

    That also makes little sense. They spent the last several episodes Basestarizing the Galactica, going as far as to give the Anders hybrid control over its systems to use technology to raid the Cylon colony, and they almost gave Cavil resurrection technology. Immediately after this, a unanimous hanging lampshade vote decides that even indoor plumbing is too dangerous? I don't believe it.

  135. Hera, evolution's Missing Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hera is our Missing Link.

    The genetic compatibility of the Neanderthals with the colonists was overrated since only Hera was a common Eve ancestor.

    Hera, the sole living fusion of human and Cylon according to God's plan, became the Eve of a yet another new hybrid race.

    I thought their 'this has all happened before, will happen again' theme was quite weak if the crux of it was that everything involving the Cylon wars with humanity was about God arranging things in such a way that Hera be delivered to Earth to start a new cycle of human-create-machines-only-to-have-another-Skynet outcome.

    Kinda weak. At least they didn't resort to time-travel crap which I thought they might be tempted to do.

  136. Not those ones by name_already_taken · · Score: 1

    Certainly, the introduction of language in addition to farming would have been a huge cultural leap over the existing hunter-gatherer lifestyle.

    Hunter gatherers don't have language already?

    The natives featured in the series finale of BSG were "pre-lingual", without language. One of the main characters said so as they were observing them.

    Think about it, you do don't need much more than a few gestures and grunts to organize a hunt or point out the location of some particularly delectable berries.

    I have to say, the finale left me a little disappointed. There was a lot of action, but once that finished they had some minor impact on humanity and all went off and died some time later. I loved the whole show from miniseries to series finale, but it did leave me wanting something more. An explanation of who "it", "god" is, and what it's playing at. Presumably angels Six and Baltar weren't just observing modern Earth for exposition.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
  137. There are some interesting comments in the uk: by roc97007 · · Score: 1
    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  138. A different ending... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, too, hated the cop-out ending with its inclusion of magical men to solve all humanity's problems.

    I would have preferred an ending like so:

    Big battle, humans, cylons, everyone throwing things that go bang at one another. Bloody, gore, general unpleasantries exchanged all around. Humanity is essentially wiped out (which is pretty much what happened except someone invited a mythical magic-man to the party)... the Final Five (Four, I suppose, as Anders wasn't exactly tap-dancing around the room) manage to save oh, say a dozen humans and jump out of the system.

    This leaves an interesting premise. The Cylons return to the 12 Colonies where they struggle to rebuild a civilisation. Initially sterile, a few are able to reproduce and, over time, due to prolonged exposure to radiation, just enough genetic diversity creeps in to allow the Cylons to reproduce safely. Over time, more and more are born fertile. 150,000 years later, they have 12 thriving colonies composed of millions of distinct individuals. In time, the Cylons come to think of themselves as human.

    Meanwhile, out in space, humans face a grim existence. 12 humans are not sufficient to guarantee genetic diversity. The Final Five aid the remaining humans, giving them access to Cylon technology, not resurrection technology, but cloning technology. Millions of individuals, all based on the same 12 models, mostly infertile due to being clones. Most humans believe they have lost their humanity and consider the clones more Cylon than human. 150,000 years pass and, one day, the clones make their way to a system of 12 Colonies occupied by the descendants of the Cylons.

    At this point, there are some seriously interesting options:

    1. Humanity attacks the 12 colonies (i.e. the cycle repeats)
    2. Humanity accepts its fate.
    3. Humans and Cylons find a way to co-exist.

  139. Re:Dissenting opinion: Jumped the shark then drown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and they did die. if hera is the genetic eve, then everyone else, and all their kids, died. ending was awful, you are correct