Slashdot Mirror


Thanks For the ... Eight-Track, Uncle Alex

Uncle Alex writes "My niece just turned one year old and her parents have asked that, instead of the usual gifts, we each contribute something to a time capsule to be opened on her 17th birthday. Multiple members of my family want to contribute digital data — text, video, music files. They came to me (the closest thing to a geek our family has) wondering: what's the best way to save the data to ensure she'll actually be able to see it in 16 years? Software might be out of date, hardware may no longer be used... any suggestions?"

633 comments

  1. Pretty easy by El+Lobo · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Files will always be available. I don't thing the file paradigm will be gone anytime soon the next 17 years. Too much legacy information would be gone in that case. For the same reason, audio and video files will keep being supported (as legacy formats perhaps) but they WILL be supported. There are huge archives in many places with terabytes of important media data that is archived and will need to be accessed somehow.

    The only problem might be the hardware, but hell, you can keep the media on some unused computer/server which will be available for only that purpose. Backup the files regularly via FTP to some other remote system (just in case). When hardware changes, just move the media to a new computer in the period of transition.

    I have a lot of data/programs from my old DOS days in the 80s that I still can access using emulators. Old floppies won't fit in my floppyless computer but I have copied them to my HD since ages back.

    --
    It's time to realise that Abble's products are the biggest abomination these days. Just say NO to the dumb iAbble way!!
    1. Re:Pretty easy by SlashWombat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course, you could use paper ... but then you take the risk that people will still be able to read 17 years into the future!

    2. Re:Pretty easy by montyzooooma · · Score: 1
      "what's the best way to save the data to ensure she'll actually be able to see it in 16 years? "

      You're missing the real point of his question. I think he's really asking how to make his Time Capsule zombie/meteor/nuclear bomb-proof.

    3. Re:Pretty easy by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Of course, you could use paper ... but then you take the risk that people will still be able to read 17 years into the future!

      I was about to suggest the same thing with flip books and printed scores but your point is very valid.

      Maybe with an English to SMS-lingo (what is it called in the US, texting lingo ?) converter ?

      Or you could include a language method with ideograms ?

      {EYE} {BIG DOT}
      {EYE} {BIG DOT} {MOVING LEGS}

      On second thought maybe not.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    4. Re:Pretty easy by NoobixCube · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Keep copies of all the software needed to play those video files *cough* vlc *cough*, and a means of running that program - maybe a whole OS in a raw hard disk image or something, so you can mount it in a virtual machine in 16 years. I'm sure some nerds will want to emulate x86 processors long after ARM has taken over.

      --
      Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
    5. Re:Pretty easy by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Save it on a harddisk. Preferable on an external one with ethernet access. You will still be able to use ethernet in 16years while USB might have become uncommon. I have 12 year old harddisks that are still active and working. With continued use half of them have died in that timeframe, but I assume that if they had been unused most would have made it.

    6. Re:Pretty easy by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would burn the video files to Bluray (primary disc) and also DVD and CD (backups). I suspect these formats will still be around 16 years from now - or at least some kind of disc player with that backwards-compatibility. I also suspect the lower density discs like CD will survive longer. I've experienced this with my own machines where the 3 1/5" floppies died, but the low-density 5 1/4" disks still worked.

      And yes text files and photos should be printed to paper. If the discs self-erase (the dye fades), then at least she'll still have the letters and photos to look at. .

       

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    7. Re:Pretty easy by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. The bearing lubrication can seize up in that time.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    8. Re:Pretty easy by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      +1 insightful

      But I doubt you'll need the original software. 16 years from now you should still be able to download the Codec Packs needed to view the videos on your ARM computerphone.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    9. Re:Pretty easy by laejoh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why not tattoo the text on her body? Paper can get lost! Ok, use a mirror so that she can later on read the message without any difficulty.

    10. Re:Pretty easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but then in 17 centuries when the archaeologists find it, they will end up thinking the BIG DOT was some evil demonic creature that attacked humans.

    11. Re:Pretty easy by wisty · · Score: 1

      Just toss in a bunch of identical USB drives (for redundancy).

      Even if USB is phased out, you should be able to get buy a junk computer that can read it. The Mac Classic was released in 1990, and you can still get those off eBay.

      Your only risk is that the junk hardware collectors lose interest. Perhaps due to some piece of hardware coming out that is even more exciting than computers. I'm guessing some type of robot.

    12. Re:Pretty easy by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Look at the available interfaces for data storage.

      Some interfaces should be available for a longer time than other.

      Secure Digital and USB are two interfaces that are changing slowly, but has a good record of backwards compatibility.

      Look at the predicted storage time for the technique selected. Storage items without moving parts are best, but even flash memories have a maximum time where data is readable.

      You also have to watch out when you store electronics since the tin in the solder joints can over time change state. This happens for some reason mostly at temperatures lower than room temperature. And the finer the electronics are the bigger the risk. And lead-free solder is more sensitive to this.

      The usual way to keep data readable is to copy it onto new media when there is a change of technology.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    13. Re:Pretty easy by zaibazu · · Score: 2, Informative

      Consumer grade optical media degrade when stored. Planning to exceed 15 years is a huge gamble

    14. Re:Pretty easy by mh1997 · · Score: 1

      I have a lot of data/programs from my old DOS days in the 80s that I still can access using emulators. Old floppies won't fit in my floppyless computer but I have copied them to my HD since ages back.

      That assumes the person will have someone in the family that has an interest in emulators and copying obsolete storeage to whatever is available.

      I'd stick with the traditional newspapers, pictures, momentos (watch, jewelry, toys), etc. Those can be read, looked at, touched even when the power is out. They also provide a physical connection to the person placing the item in the capsule - grandpa held this toy in his hands and now I am also.

    15. Re:Pretty easy by mog007 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      USB 3.0 is coming in a year or so, and it's still maintaining backwards compatibility with the older revisions, so it seems reasonable that computers 17 years in the future would be able to support them, since USB technology is already 13 years old. The bigger problem would be the file system on the drive. Is FAT16 still supported by default on the major operating systems of today?

    16. Re:Pretty easy by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      what could be better than opening a time capsule and seeing the goatse?

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    17. Re:Pretty easy by phil+reed · · Score: 1

      Most flash drive manufacturers state that their drives are not good for archival storage. They expect to lose data before 10 years have passed.

      --

      ...phil
      "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
    18. Re:Pretty easy by Bakkster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Most flash drive manufacturers state that their drives are not good for archival storage. They expect to lose data before 10 years have passed.

      This is absolutely correct, no flash memory. Unlike hard drives (and tapes, for completeness), which store data as magnetic regions, flash memory stores actual electric charge. While the magnetic domains on an HDD are permanent (unless overwritten or degaussed), the small charge in each flash media bit will slowly leak away. The drive should still be usable, it just won't have your data on it anymore.

      A portable hard drive might be the best solution, for its small size and relative permanence of data. Perhaps even an iPod, preloaded with music that it can play, pictures and video it can watch, and files that (assuming USB and the files system are still around) will also be available. One iPod with everyone's files could be a good split, and a great trip down memory lane. Just be sure to pack in a USB wall charging socket, just in case.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    19. Re:Pretty easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.salon.com/tech/log/2000/01/26/sun_dot/

      "It looks like an old "Jaws" movie poster, with a swimmer at the surface and a humongous, menacing -- wait, that's not a shark, it's a big dot lurking below. "The Dot" -- with the teaser "Just when your competition thought it was safe to do business" -- is one of 10 new Sun Microsystems movie-poster spoofing ads, whose recent appearance in publications like the New Yorker, the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times is supposed to prime us for a $100 million-plus ad blitz starting in February."

      sadly, I can't find the video anywhere, it was an awesome spot. There was a big menacing dot and it sorta attacked people.

    20. Re:Pretty easy by mwvdlee · · Score: 2, Informative

      Archival grade isn't prohibitively expensive and should last a bit longer (some claim 100 years or more so they should last atleast 15 years). CD would probably be your best bet if all data fits on it, since newer media players for Bluray/DVD/HD-DVD/etc all seem to remain backwards compatible with CD.

      How long do things like USB sticks last?

      If you want to be difficult, you could also develop a simple protocol for printing and scanning binary data on paper, then print a definition of the protocol and data. Be sure to use good ink and paper though!

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    21. Re:Pretty easy by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I never understood that. I can understand the purple-colored dye fading if it's exposed to light (same as a rug or painting fades), but if it's stored inside a dark Caselogic notebook, why would it fade? It should be just fine.

      I guess you could also throw-in a USB flashdrive for backup. That ought to last 15 years, but the question is - Will it still be readable? What if USB ports disappear like PS/2, Centronics, and serial connections have disappeared? For example I have an ancient 80s printer that still works, but I have no way to hook it up. The same might happen to a USB drive.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    22. Re:Pretty easy by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most flash memory only quotes a retention time of a decade or so. Whether that is optimistic or pessimistic is not yet clear.

    23. Re:Pretty easy by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>seeing the goatse?

      Then you'll be arrested for exposing a minor to porn. Isn't (lack of) freedom great??? I think this is one of those laws that needs to be rewritten, where it's okay to discuss sex and even show educational videos, if the young adult has reached age 13. Current laws forbid this practice, and could result in parents being arrested.

      I figure at age 13 they need the information. Better to have informed teens rather than ignorant ("You can't get pregnant the first time," "It's safe to have sex halfway between periods," et cetera).

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    24. Re:Pretty easy by MikeBabcock · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If I were going to pick a random filesystem that will be readable in 15+ years for such a project, I'd probably put my bets on ISO9660, especially since this is a read-only storage situation.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    25. Re:Pretty easy by laejoh · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be constants instead of variables? We're talking tattoos here!

    26. Re:Pretty easy by Clairvoyant · · Score: 1

      I'd suggest storing a certain clip from Rick Astley on a DVD :)

      Anyhow, to at least have some understanding of what IO we'll have in 16 years, we'd have to look back 16 years. What did we have back then? Floppies were mainstream and CD-ROMs were starting to appear. HDDs obviously, but I wonder if those interfaces are going to be around for much longer. You could question whether USB would be still be available by that time (some examples of ancient IO can be seen above, in someone elses post). My guess is something like Bluray would probably be your best guess. Why? Because there's a huge industry behind it that sees value in keeping that product alife for awhile. USB is a relatively easily discarded interface which is upgraded constantly and there is no proof it will be backwards compatible in 16 years. The Film industry will most likely force already-ancient things like Bluray to be available in 16 to 20 years. If that industry hasn't died by then, that is...

    27. Re:Pretty easy by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      DVD with the data in video format and one of those cheap portable players......we will still have wall plugs, right? I've got some DVDs purchased over 10 years ago that still seem new (well, the media -- some of the movies are dated looking). Not that hard to imagine that they'll hold up for at least 10 more. By including the player, you don't have to worry about the format becoming obsolete.

      http://www.amazon.com/Coby-TFDVD7008-7-Inch-Portable-Player/dp/B001PRKKB6/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1251204715&sr=8-3

    28. Re:Pretty easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple, use punchcards.

    29. Re:Pretty easy by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      It won't matter. In 2012 the galatic conjunction will take place that will obliterate us all.....

      So, take up a collection from the family for any invented solution you want and then just pocket it.

    30. Re:Pretty easy by DrLang21 · · Score: 4, Informative

      What if USB ports disappear like PS/2, Centronics, and serial connections have disappeared?

      This is a non-issue as you have described it. I just built a brand new computer 5 months ago. I was not interested in any of those items listed, yet it has a parallel port, a serial port, and two PS/2 ports. It's actually unfortunate that they don't make a RS-232 flash drive because the serial port is not going anywhere for a very long time. You might need to purchase a special card in the future to have it, but it is far too convenient and easy for use with industrial controls to ever die out.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    31. Re:Pretty easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You stated that flash memory would degrade, and then recommended an iPod.

      Out of interest, what do you think iPods use to store their files?

      Don't worry, I have days like that too.

    32. Re:Pretty easy by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1
      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    33. Re:Pretty easy by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Constants instead of variables, tattoos? Geeze, it's like you're living on some kind of fantasy island or something.

    34. Re:Pretty easy by riyley · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd suggest storing a certain clip from Rick Astley on a DVD :)

      http://xkcd.com/573/

    35. Re:Pretty easy by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you want to include digital files, the best option is to probably include the entire hardware/software stack to run it on. Get a netbook, and throw that in there. Kind of an expensive option, but definitely would ensure that the data could be read. I'm almost certain we'll still be using the same AC outlets in 17 years time. Or at worst, you'd need some kind of plug adapter.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    36. Re:Pretty easy by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      You really think Apple is selling 120GB of Flash storage with a bonus iPod for only US$249?

    37. Re:Pretty easy by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Informative

      >>>I've got some DVDs purchased over 10 years ago that still seem new

      DVD-ROMs or DVD-Rs because they are not the same thing. The ROM uses pits pressed into the disc and theoretically will last forever as long as the pits remain undamaged, but the -R uses a purplish dye that fades with time.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    38. Re:Pretty easy by CecilPL · · Score: 1
    39. Re:Pretty easy by ciderVisor · · Score: 1

      I figure at age 13 they need the information.

      Maybe so, but I don't think they need goatse'd at that age !

      --
      Squirrel!
    40. Re:Pretty easy by stickmaster_flex · · Score: 1

      Assuming that we're still using electricity in 16 years. . .

    41. Re:Pretty easy by Anivair · · Score: 1

      this. Include a copy of ubuntu and you're covered. Trust me, in 17 years she'll b able to find a computer that will run it. hell, if 17 years she'll probably be able to find someone still running windows 98. You overestimate progress. Put them on DVD and be done with it. the whole point of a time capsule is that it's old stuff. If I opened a time capsul from when i was born and it had CD's and flash drives, I'd feel cheated (and I'd wonder where they got those).

    42. Re:Pretty easy by jdoverholt · · Score: 1

      You must work high up in the government. I remember an Air Force policy coming down along the lines of "You can't use any personal flash devices in our computers--that means iPods!"

    43. Re:Pretty easy by Ziwcam · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't worry about USB disappearing. My company recently bought a brand new Dell. I couldn't believe that Dell was still shipping computers with a VGA port, first introduced 22 years ago! USB is 13 years old. 10 years from now, it will still be shipping on new Dells, and it won't be hard to find a 6 year old Dell in use by someone when the girl turns 17. OT: What makes me cringe even more: Most of our machines have DVI ports. Most of our displays also have DVI ports. So why are my coworkers using the VGA connectors on each?

    44. Re:Pretty easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most flash drive manufacturers state that their drives are not good for archival storage. They expect to lose data before 10 years have passed.

      This is absolutely correct, no flash memory. Unlike hard drives (and tapes, for completeness), which store data as magnetic regions, flash memory stores actual electric charge. While the magnetic domains on an HDD are permanent (unless overwritten or degaussed), the small charge in each flash media bit will slowly leak away. The drive should still be usable, it just won't have your data on it anymore.

      A portable hard drive might be the best solution, for its small size and relative permanence of data. Perhaps even an iPod, preloaded with music that it can play, pictures and video it can watch, and files that (assuming USB and the files system are still around) will also be available. One iPod with everyone's files could be a good split, and a great trip down memory lane. Just be sure to pack in a USB wall charging socket, just in case.

      Wouldn't an iPod be subject to the same flaws as flash memory?

    45. Re:Pretty easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      will placing the USB drive in a port help recharge the data?

    46. Re:Pretty easy by arb+phd+slp · · Score: 1

      I wondered about that in my lab just last week. Every one of the machines, including one that IT hooked up this month, is connected to its monitor via VGA.

      So I switched the cables to DVI and I couldn't see any difference. Then it sortof made sense.

      --
      There's a perfect xkcd for my sig but I'm too lazy to look it up. sudo someone go find it.
    47. Re:Pretty easy by jolewine · · Score: 1

      Because monitors normally only come with the VGA cable.

      Also even if USB falls out of normal use one should consider that there will most likely be an adapter for whatever the next big connector for computer peripherals to USB.

    48. Re:Pretty easy by michael_cain · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, I have ISO file systems that I burned on CDs 15 years ago and current computers have no difficulty mounting them. I would still choose that over UDF (ISO 13346) on DVD for two reasons: lower density recording is typically more tolerant of physical degradation, and the video industry seems more likely to abandon DVD for higher capacity media than the music industry to abandon CD.

      The formats for individual files are important too. On those oldest disks, I can still view the HTML, images in JPEG and GIF, and flat ASCII text files. Interestingly, groff handles the troff/mm files on the disk without any difficulties, but extracting the Word files took a bit more effort. The PostScript files on the disk still render just fine (no PDF files to try). The MPEG files on the disks play.

    49. Re:Pretty easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ha ha ha

    50. Re:Pretty easy by ptelligence · · Score: 1

      How cool would that be. Put family videos and pictures on the netbook in a place where they are easily accessible, disconnect the battery and reseal it in its original packaging. An Ipod touch might be a good idea as well.

    51. Re:Pretty easy by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Make sure to label the socket as well saying it still runs on 110V if you're in the America's. By then I hope the US has fully switched to 220VAC for high power or 12/24VAC for sockets (in order to easily integrate with small wind or solar powered setups)

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    52. Re:Pretty easy by marcansoft · · Score: 1

      FAT*12* is still supported pretty much everywhere, and it's still in use for smallish SD cards and the like (~8MB). Not that I think the FAT variants are a great filesystem, but chances are you're going to be able to read them for many years. If you're concerned, stick a printout of the spec in there. FAT is simple enough to pick apart with a hex editor given some time, and it doesn't take very long to write a read-only implementation of it.

    53. Re:Pretty easy by MojoRilla · · Score: 1

      I don't think an IPod is a good solution.

      Lithium Ion batteries have a pretty short shelf life. According to Wikipedia, "At a 100% charge level, a typical Li-ion laptop battery that is full most of the time at 25 C or 77 F will irreversibly lose approximately 20% capacity per year."

      I'm unable to find specific information about the IPod shelf life, but given this, I don't think the battery would charge at all after 17 years.

    54. Re:Pretty easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you go this route, make sure you're using a hard drive based iPod. Most are SSD and probably not much better than a flash card...

    55. Re:Pretty easy by tchuladdiass · · Score: 1

      You mean like the Softstrips?

    56. Re:Pretty easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is absolutely correct, no flash memory... Perhaps even an iPod, preloaded with music that it can play, pictures and video it can watch...

      You're forgetting about the flash from which the iPod executes its program.

    57. Re:Pretty easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm buying an Intel G45 chipset motherboard in the next few weeks, and it looks like about 20% of the boards on the market have a PS/2 connector (which matters to me since I want one for my old keyboard). I don't recall seeing any with a Centronics or DB9 or DB25 serial.

      Those legacy connectors are a major constraint on motherboard choices. I really think the fact that you ended up with those ports, despite not going out of your way to get 'em, was an anomaly.

      Shit, half the boards on the market don't even have PATA anymore.

    58. Re:Pretty easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just remember that most iPods are flash based so make sure you get one with a hard drive.

    59. Re:Pretty easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome, thank you for the very unfunny xkcd link. Always has to be atleast one per article, and they're never funny. Ever.

    60. Re:Pretty easy by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Indeed, something like that.

      With modern printer and scanner resolutions, color ink and error correction algorithm you could probably get a lot more data on a square inch than the 1000 bytes of that code that Softstrips manages.

      If you could to 300DPI with CMYK (1 bit each), you could have 360Kb. If you assume 50% overhead, that would still be enough to encode some 15MB on a single page.

      With lower (== more resilient?) resolution and better algorithms, you could print a single MP3 on each side.

      It may not be the most efficient way of storing information, but it'll probably outlast any other medium.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    61. Re:Pretty easy by Mephistophlese · · Score: 1

      Why not use a technique which has been around since the 50's and the required parts are ubiquitous; write the data to a PROM chip. Remember include schematics to build an output device(s) or you can build them yourself and include those as well.

      You can use each chip to produce one type of media such as text output or audio output. Storage is nearly endless depending upon your time and monetary budget constraints.

      --
      I don't mean to sound cold and cynical - but I am, so that's the way it comes out.
    62. Re:Pretty easy by Cstryon · · Score: 1

      Maybe a laptop with a current and well working OS on it. Get all the files/applications we want little miss one year old to see in the future, and then turn it off. Stuff the power cable, laptop, maybe physical copies of media, all into the box and store it away.

      This way, you don't have to worry about legacy software right? Everything should work together right out of the box.

      This kind of reminds me of the time I went digging through my families old stuff, and pulled out an Atari 2600! Of course, some of the games were in bad shape, as this was NOT in a time capsule.

      --
      Indoctrinate : to instruct especially in fundamentals or rudiments Educate : to develop mentally, morally, or aestheti
    63. Re:Pretty easy by objekt · · Score: 1

      "Of course, you could use paper ... but then you take the risk that people will still be able to read 17 years into the future!"

      How would non-paper storage of the same data alleviate the need to be read by people?

      And don't go replying with "*wooosh*"! I get the joke, but the joke is flawed. If you don't understand the flaw, then *wooosh* back at ya!

      --
      -- Boycott Shell
    64. Re:Pretty easy by Bakkster · · Score: 1

      Yup, thanks for pointing him to that information. The only iPods to use flash memory (to my knowledge)are the iPod shuffle, which does not have a video screen, or the iPod touch. The good old basic iPods (which I should have specified, as opposed to the touch) have always used HDDs, since they're cost effective and provide a relatively large amount of storage.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    65. Re:Pretty easy by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I never understood that. I can understand the purple-colored dye fading if it's exposed to light (same as a rug or painting fades), but if it's stored inside a dark Caselogic notebook, why would it fade? It should be just fine.

      Because the chemicals in the dye are not inert and not stable. They do degrade over time regardless of where you store them, all you can do is slow the degradation down.

    66. Re:Pretty easy by jridley · · Score: 1

      I can almost guarantee they'll be unreadable in 17 years. I have a few thousand CD and DVD media that are up to 12 years old at this point, and the DVDs have a high rate of decay, even when stored on higher end media. The CDs also decay, especially when written to cheap consumer grade discs. The ones that have survived totally intact from the oldest archives are those written to Kodak DataLife Gold CDRs. I don't even know if you can still get those or if they're as good as they used to be. I was paying nearly $5 each for them back then.

      I've actually switched to storing my stuff on 1TB SATA drives (with a mirror), because over the years I've had almost no data loss on hard drive, but I've lost hundreds of files to CD/DVD rot.

    67. Re:Pretty easy by Bakkster · · Score: 1

      You're correct, the battery will probably be effectively dead in 17 years. Assuming that 20% loss of battery life per year, that leaves 2.5% at the end of 17 years.

      However, a proper charging adapter provides power to the iPod while plugged in, while still allowing the iPod to be used. This means that it's no longer functional as a mobile player, but should still fulfill its purpose while plugged in. Better than nothing.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    68. Re:Pretty easy by jridley · · Score: 1

      That probably won't work. For one thing, take the battery out, because in 17 years it'll probably degrade into a toxic sludge. Also there's probably a clock battery inside, disassemble and remove that too or it could dissolve itself and part of the main board.

      If you leave a hard drive sitting that long, the bearings will probably seize. If you buy one with SSD drive instead, that will almost certainly have bit rot in 17 years, so the thing won't boot anyway, and forget reinstalling; in 17 years it'll be illegal to have any OS except for Windows, and it'll require 32 terabytes of RAM, a minimum 64 processor, 128 GHz CPU and a 2 petabyte drive to boot from.

    69. Re:Pretty easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unsure of others but i have two little thumb drives i just checked after reading this. neither has been out of the junk drawer for almost 2 years and they both still read fine and had all there stuff.

      still a far cry from 17 years though and of course thumd drives are not meant for long term storage i just thought i would check mine

    70. Re:Pretty easy by jridley · · Score: 1

      Every machine I own uses VGA, not DVI. The only use I put DVI to is that I have a DVI to HDMI adaptor to hook my MythTV box up to my TV.

    71. Re:Pretty easy by jridley · · Score: 1

      FAT will still be readable in 200 years. Heck, even if it's not immediately supported, it's such a simple filesystem that you could whack together a program to read the files from an image in a couple of hours.

      But it won't be necessary; given that practically every consumer device from thumb drives to MP3 players and cameras mount via USB and FAT, nobody's going to build an OS for the forseeable future that won't support FAT.

    72. Re:Pretty easy by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are plenty of PS/2->USB, DB25(Centronics)->USB and DB9->USB converters available. I don't think you should worry too much about USB going anywhere in only 17 years.

    73. Re:Pretty easy by JourneymanMereel · · Score: 1

      My TV has a VGA input and a 1/8" phone connector for the audio... so I don't even use DVI for that :)

      For a while I had a computer where the video card had one VGA output and one DVI output. The video card was capable of sending a different signal out each port. I had two identical monitors that had both a VGA and a DVI input... so I connected one monitor to VGA and one to DVI to get a dual monitor setup. I never noticed any difference between the two monitors as far as connection quality was concerned.

      --
      Life has many choices. Eternity has two. What's yours?
    74. Re:Pretty easy by PIBM · · Score: 1

      Make sure not to throw the hardware too hard in there, else you'll just be stuck with even more useless stuff :p

    75. Re:Pretty easy by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Lithium batteries like the ones used in iPods only last a few years at most due to the way they're designed. The Lithium oxidizes and can no longer deliver the charge. There is no "just in case" about putting a charger with it... that's the only way you'll get anything to play. I'd highly recommend taking the battery out and putting it in another container just in case it decides to spontaneously combust, too.

    76. Re:Pretty easy by anss123 · · Score: 1

      The good old basic iPods have always used HDDs

      My PC got some code in flash memory that's needed for it to start up. I'd be surprised if that wasn't the case for ipods too.

      Also my Game Boy's screen have rotted despite not being used for years and years (It's 19 years old come to think if it). The GB still works but an MP3 player might have some component that limits its lifetime even if unused.

      To make matters worse, today's hard drives use flash to store their firmware. Hmm. Troublesome

    77. Re:Pretty easy by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      Umm. Looking on NewEgg there isn't a single board that doesn't have at least one PATA port and spot checking motherboard I couldn't find a single one that didn't include at least one serial port and two PS/2 ports. Legacy-free boards are available, but they're still nowhere near the bulk of the market.

    78. Re:Pretty easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those that missed it, think 'radioactive half-life' only instead of shedding radiation it is fading into non-existence re: Back to the Future.

    79. Re:Pretty easy by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Yeah. An iPod. Good luck with DRM then complaining you did not connect to the Apple server for 17 years and therefore can't use the thing at all anymore. :P
      That fad is like a bad virus. It just won't die. It's just an MP3 player for god's sake!

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    80. Re:Pretty easy by shimage · · Score: 1

      Including an OS just so you can run binaries seems a bit overkill to me. Why not keep a list of hardware/software you need to use what's in the capsule in a drawer somewhere? There is no expectation that her parents should both vanish before she's 17, so it's not like they couldn't make sure they kept what they needed to access the data. That said, I think the following formats should still be around ASCII (possibly formatted into html or rich text), jpeg, mp3. For video, probably any of the mpeg4 codecs should be fine (divx, h264, etc). Put it all on a CD. Binaries are sure to change, so unless you want to include the whole OS, I don't think packing executables is a good idea.

    81. Re:Pretty easy by do_kev · · Score: 1

      I would be somewhat apprehensive about using an iPod given their track-records (personally, I've found that iPods rarely last more than a few years, let alone 16!) Granted, the hardware is likely to be better preserved if it isn't getting banged around in your pocket every day, but I would still be concerned about either the iPod having broken, or being unbootable due to battery degradation.

      That being said, however, you seem to have proposed an excellent solution if put in its general form: circumvent the difficulties of predicting how to store the data by including a device that can read it. Are there any computer rigs that are liable to remain functional in 17 years?

    82. Re:Pretty easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something to think about on the Magnetic storage devices. Make sure your Time Capsule container does not have a strong Magnetic field!!

      I think it should be something like CDs or DVDs. These formats are not going to disappear even with newer formats coming out(Blue-ray).

    83. Re:Pretty easy by Linuxmonger · · Score: 1

      Ever noticed that odd celery like smell when you open up a spindle of CDs? That's the smell of atoms leaving the area - atoms whose configuration holds your data.
      Everything evaporates or sublimates, everything deteriorates.

      --
      (You are a fluke of the universe)

    84. Re:Pretty easy by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      If you're concerned, stick a printout of the spec in there. FAT is simple enough to pick apart with a hex editor given some time, and it doesn't take very long to write a read-only implementation of it.

      Have I wandered into another thread by accident, or are we still talking about something targeted at a seventeen year old girl? Because most seventeen year olds of either gender would sooner set themselves on fire than throw themselves into coding a filesystem implementation based off of careful studying of a spec sheet. Hell, I'm a 30 year old geek and I'd rather set myself on fire. And let's face it, if the stars align and she turns into enough of a die-hard tech head to do that, then any format of any age will work - she'll take decoding it as a challenge.

      I suppose the person who's giving it could do the decoding and whatnot, if they're still around in 16 years. But if that's the case, just write on a note "Ask me for the stuff I was going to put in here.", then stash your time capsule data (JPGs, basic HTML, ASCII, etc.) in an obvious place with the other files you normally back up (you do backups, right)? And then it'll get naturally elevated to the newest file system format as you upgrade your systems.

    85. Re:Pretty easy by geekoid · · Score: 1

      just get a mac mini, load your data. Seal it in an air tight container.
      In 17 years she can just plug it in and be good to go.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    86. Re:Pretty easy by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      LOL you must not be looking in the right places. Even dell PCs and servers dont come with them more often than not and I would say more people buy PCs than build them.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    87. Re:Pretty easy by KC7JHO · · Score: 1

      ... just include a un-passworded laptop, a small one like TheOne from acer, or some similar machine, short note on how to power it on, do you really not think you will be around in 16 years to just show her how to do it?

    88. Re:Pretty easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make sure to write in Spanish.

    89. Re:Pretty easy by Rei · · Score: 1

      I was going to suggest the same thing.

      Don't forget to package it in an watertight/airtight package with plenty of silica gel packets and store it in a cool place with little temperature fluctuation.

      --
      Dear Lord: I don't want to go back to college, so please help me be sexy. Amen.
    90. Re:Pretty easy by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      I would suggest Magneto-Optical disks. The ones I have are good for 50 years (or so it says on the box).

    91. Re:Pretty easy by Chabo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even if there's no serial port, many motherboards still come with a serial header; the white header on the bottom of this board is for a serial port.

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    92. Re:Pretty easy by Retric · · Score: 1

      That's overkill for 17 years. Just use a few USB sticks. Interfaces tend to stay backward compatable for a long time. So finding a 5 year old computer that supports a 12 year old standard in 2026 should be easy.

    93. Re:Pretty easy by mog007 · · Score: 1

      I'm not talking about FAT in general, but FAT32 specifically. I imagine that FAT32's limitations will be major hurdles in the next couple years. What about the day when we have hard drive based camcorders that record in HD? I'm sure those files would max out the 4 gig limit of a FAT file.

      I suppose it's doubtful that operating systems will flat out remove support for FAT, but I wouldn't discount the possibility. Microsoft might completely kill support for FAT32 in a decade, and if that happens, I doubt the Linux community would continue to include native support for it, because it wouldn't be needed.

    94. Re:Pretty easy by dwywit · · Score: 1
      Ahem - B&W (monochromatic) silver halide photographic prints, properly processed and stored, are probably the "sweet spot" WRT permanence/density. I mean, carved stone tablets would outlast just about anything, but you can't fit much on 'em. OTOH, the resolution of low-speed B&W film provides a reasonable density. A bonus of such a system is that you don't need electronics to retrieve the information.

      You could use lithographic film to store copies of the printed word or even binary data such as MP3, and orthographic film to store images - even colour images.

      See, this is how they did it way back when - you take a sheet of 5x4 B&W film, expose it through a red filter, then repeat with another sheet and a green filter, and again with a blue filter. It's called colour separation. Then you contact-print the negatives onto identical film to produce a positive image of each one. Then you get three projectors, one with a red filter, one with a green filter, and one with a blue filter, load the image positives into the appropriate projector, turn 'em on, line 'em up, and hey, presto! You've got your original image without any electronics or software.

      Of course you'd have to leave schematics for the projectors, but that's not difficult. And translating binary data would be a problem - maybe store music on vinyl and leave schematics for a phonograph.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    95. Re:Pretty easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that increasingly you will see all that "over USB". Specifically, instead of a "special card", it'll be an inline dongle (already very common) or an external USB box with multiple serial ports (to replace the card + fat proprietary cable + box with multiple serial ports currently used where one server needs lots of ports).

    96. Re:Pretty easy by dwywit · · Score: 1
      Don't you mean 12/24V D C?

      But yes, 12/24VDC is great for household lighting and refrigeration (maybe even computers, as long as it's a regulated supply), 220/230/240VAC for heavy needs like vacuum cleaners, etc.

      Strangely enough, I've got a Fisher & Paykel washing machine that plugs into 240VAC, but runs 24VDC internally - when I have the time, money and inclination, I'll bypass the 240VAC stage and hook it directly to the household 24VDC circuit.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    97. Re:Pretty easy by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      What i've generally found is that generic motherboards (either purchased seperately or as part of a PC build from a small system builder) are far more likely to have the legacy ports than those made for use in big brand machines.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    98. Re:Pretty easy by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Afaict many lithium ion based devices don't have a bypass path (adding one complicates the power circuitry quite a bit, especially when you are dealing with the low voltage of a single cell lithium ion pack). So running on charge has to happen via the charger.

      The trouble with this is that for safety reasons a typical lithium ion charger will only start a charge if it sees a good battery pack.

      Afaict this is the reason that many mobile phones won't work with the battery pack removed even if you plug in a charger.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    99. Re:Pretty easy by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      The battery will not turn into toxic sludge. I have old UPS batteries sitting around at my office. They are probably around 17 years old, and while they don't hold much of a charge anymore, they certainly haven't degraded to toxic sludge. Same goes for the little button cells on motherboards. I've booted up computers that are way more than 17 years old. Unless you are planning on burying the time capsule in the ground in a cardboard box for 17 years, you shouldn't really have any problems. As long as the components are kept dry and at room temperature, there's no reason the components should break down in such a short period.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    100. Re:Pretty easy by guruevi · · Score: 1

      DC at those low voltages is pretty hard to distribute actually - you'll lose a lot of power in the wires which in turn also presents a fire hazard. Especially if you have a house with somewhat older wiring I wouldn't trust a high amped DC on the line. A turbine of some sorts (water, solar, wind, nuclear) most likely will generate AC internally anyway (you know with the coils and everything) and the infrastructure for AC is already there. High Voltage DC however works fine for a lot of reasons but for internal wiring, AC will probably always prevail.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    101. Re:Pretty easy by dwywit · · Score: 1
      My house was dual-wired when it was built. All circuits run on standard 240VAC 10amp 3-core, with some connected to the 24 volt bus, and some connected to the 240 volt inverter. All the household lighting and refrigeration runs on 24 volt circuits, and I'm careful to not load any circuit beyond 8 or 9 amps. There are 240 volt outlets, and 24 volt outlets (polarised socket), so there's no danger of plugging a 24 volt device into a 240 volt socket!

      Don't have any turbines - only solar PV - so the supply is 24VDC.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    102. Re:Pretty easy by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't even be that paranoid.

      CDs will be readable in 17 years.

      And you can always play the numbers game. A stack of 100 CDs or DVDs is practically free.

      Burn 100 DVDs. Then if 99 of them fade or die you still have 1. Safety through redundancy. I can't believe that all 100 DVDs would die after 17 years.

      Alternately you could put it onto the internet. Then just store the URL. Let someone else worry about keeping it backed up. Again if you're paranoid... use multiple hosting sites and provide a list of mirrors for the data.

    103. Re:Pretty easy by Goetterdaemmerung · · Score: 1

      CD's would be far superior to BluRay as they have nearly 30 years of maturity behind them, and are very ubiquitous. Their lifespan is well documented and the drives come in a wide variety of interfaces, in addition to being backwards compatible with all modern optical drives. Bluray is still too new and there is no guarantee it will achieve the same longevity. 20 years from now I'd put my money on finding a compatible CD drive.
       

      Even more confidence comes with paper, photographs, film and knickknacks.
       

      Seriously, 17 years isn't that long and I wouldn't worry about it.

    104. Re:Pretty easy by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity - what would you suggest people in the future use _instead_ of files?

    105. Re:Pretty easy by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      USB ports disappear, within the next 15 years? With USB 3.0 probably not reaching widespread adoption for another 5 years, I highly doubt it :)

      I think the days of highly available, backwards compatible interfaces that are used by pretty much everyone just disappearing are pretty much over. What reasons are there why you shouldn't be able to develop USB 4.0, 5.0, 6.0 and so on, while still maintaining compatibility for 1.0?

    106. Re:Pretty easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Virtually all consumer grade and high-end gamer grade motherboards are lacking and will be lacking in parallel and serial ports since at least last year but most boards intended for business computers still come with both standard.

      High-end gamer boards now are even shipping with only 1 IDE port!

    107. Re:Pretty easy by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      I'm almost certain we'll still be using the same AC outlets in 17 years time.

      Even if you're not, the country-specific plug is usually detachable on laptop power supplies and connected by a standardised connector. These are in use all over the world they're unlikely to be phased out in the next 17 years.

    108. Re:Pretty easy by matt20102 · · Score: 1

      001100010010011110100001101101110011...

    109. Re:Pretty easy by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      I agree with that, most boards need to be versatile for sales. The OEM motherboards built for dell HP and IBM all have a specific purpose and therefore not as much need for legacy support.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    110. Re:Pretty easy by lpq · · Score: 1

      Is this before or after we ...
      run out of electricity due to world energy crisis...
      or
      before the big 'EMP' that thows the US[World] back into the the 1800's...
      or...
      (be sure to include an power generator?.... :-))
      Maybe have it be self-booting and require no reading -- just a giant pictograph?

      Those self mutating viruses that destroy read/write ability... ....what if they don't recognize it as a computer or a message?
      Should it contain motion or light detection and start automatically?

      They could think it a virus threat from the past: they are all tech-merged people who hear horror stories about virus ridden computers from the past and will be afraid to activate it...?

      Etc...all sorts of things to watch out for if you watch enough SyFy... ;^)

    111. Re:Pretty easy by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Your ups has a rechargable lead acid battery in a sealed container. Watch batteries are usually NiMH or something like that, so they behave differently. I second the toxic sludge theory.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    112. Re:Pretty easy by geekprime · · Score: 1

      All my computers still have 25 pin printer ports, PS/2 ports AND serial ports, even the one I just built with a brand spankin new cheap as possible motherboard.

      Pc's never had actual centronics ports for printers just the db 25's Scsi ports looked like them (and some still do) but they are bigger.

  2. KISS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ASCII, printed on UV-resistant foil

  3. Print it! by IBBoard · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Just print the text, get the tablature or sheet music for any songs and print a booklet of screencaps of the videos so that she can flick through them to "animate" them. Put it all in a dry environment and it should be fine until it is opened, and you can guarantee the required technology is still available!

    1. Re:Print it! by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or get the entire package, transform it into a single file (by whatever means necessary) and print the binary code of that file in 2D barcode, in plastic sheets.

      It will last well over five thousand years and no matter the difficulty of reading it, it will always be at least possible.

      If you expect your niece to become a vampire or somehow surpass the expiration date of plastic, you can pay a little to get the 2D barcoded plastic sheets engraved in metal sheets or tablets.

      Follow those steps and your niece's time capsule might become the rosetta stone for an intelligent being aeons away.

    2. Re:Print it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once saw a (OSS, if I'm not wrong) software which does exactly that - aimed at long term data archiving. Anybody got a link?

    3. Re:Print it! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Hey, you gave me an idea for long-term storage: How about a micro-engraved hard metal disc with a protection against the effects of nature (eg chemicals and humidity in the air)?
      Like a vinyl disk for example. Make it as detailed as possible, and always deliver it with a reader that survives the same time and has a wide variety of interfaces.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    4. Re:Print it! by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Punch cards. No need to worry about losing magnetic spots, or having a DVD backing peel away. As for reading them in the future? Well, that's a perfect do-it-yourself project.

    5. Re:Print it! by jhsiao · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't rely on digital media. Despite your family's digital obsession, I'd stick with the objects that are tangible. Paper, metal, plastic, fabric. Things that don't degrade for 17 years. Some ideas:

      - one stock certificate of Google and/or Apple stock

      - something from the Beijing Olympics (one year ago) like one of those collectible pins (that people trade all the time)

      - a business book just before the market took a nosedive (e.g. Dow 40,000 would be good)

      - a set of bumper stickers from the 2008 presidential election

    6. Re:Print it! by Solarhands · · Score: 1

      If you expect your niece to become a vampire or somehow surpass the expiration date of plastic, you can pay a little to get the 2D barcoded plastic sheets engraved in metal sheets or tablets.

      "I write these words in steel, for anything not set in metal cannot be trusted..."

  4. Get a netbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get her a cheap netbook or something equivalent. That way she only needs to get /power/ for the device and everything else can be sorted out as needs dictate.

    1. Re:Get a netbook by Ringthane · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I was going to suggest. And, instead of bulky discs, get thumbdrives or SD cards. You can often get a 16 gb drive for $30 from the links on Dealhack or other such bargain sites.

      --
      Friends help you move... Real friends help you move bodies...
    2. Re:Get a netbook by Lershac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      flash memory will not last that long, the charge will leak away... the drive will probably still be usable, but the stored data will have *gone away*

      --
      Chuck
    3. Re:Get a netbook by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

      Please note that many of these flash ROM solutions decay over time as the charge is lost. Ten years is often stated as the maximum.

      The CD format seems to be the most durable, as I have ten year old CD-R's that are still readable. Many of my data DVD's, though, tend to be more sensitive to data loss.

      Magnetic tape drives boasted that the information could survive over a century, but even today you can't find any commodity drives.

      My advice would be to plan for a durable medium, and also that the medium will have to be brought to a special company to be transferred onto "modern" media.

    4. Re:Get a netbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure that a SLC flash will deteriorate in just 16 years? With MLC, I'd guess it could happen, but SLC should be robust enough to survive more than a decade.

    5. Re:Get a netbook by mgblst · · Score: 1

      And, instead of bulky discs, get thumbdrives or SD cards.

      Or, just write it on the sand at the beach, just as intelligent a suggestion as this moron.

  5. Netbook by Shin-LaC · · Score: 3, Insightful

    16 years isn't such a long time, but just to be sure, put a netbook inside the capsule. Make sure it can run on external power alone, and remove the battery.

    1. Re:Netbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This leads to a good question, will a solid state hard drive survive 16 years without data corruption? If it is a platter hard drive, the best you are looking at is 8-10 years. The life span of platter drive decreases if it is not accessed.

      Looking at USB's history, 1.0 was released in 1996. this is 12 years ago, and it is still backwards compatible to this day. A good hedge might be to get a USB 2.0 thumb drive (granted if the answer the my question is no, than you might have to result to punch cards and paper), and load it up with the data you want to preserve. Considering that the next iteration of USB is backwards compatible, it is a safe bet that there will be a computer that can read it.

      Keep in mind that 16 years ago we used PATA and that still comes default with new motherboards.

    2. Re:Netbook by CrystalX · · Score: 1

      16 years isn't such a long time, but just to be sure, put a netbook inside the capsule. Make sure it can run on external power alone, and remove the battery.

      Agreed. If you intend to archive the actual digital objects (and not transcribe them to some other medium like paper), you need to include the hardware/software to decode them. A netbook is a cheap way to do this.

      For some additional reading on the digital dark age problem:
      * http://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/the-digital-dark-age/2005/09/22/1126982184206.html
      * http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/FileFormatsreport.pdf

    3. Re:Netbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USB 3.0 is optical for the data lines, IIRC, and will be released to consumers on new hardware starting in January.

      There is already hardware (controllers) for developers and support is in the Linux kernel.

    4. Re:Netbook by Carewolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A standard harddisk survives 6-10 years of continued _use_. Storing it is perfectly safe. If you are really worried buy a modern SCSI drive, they should be able to survive the 16years even if it is running the whole time.

    5. Re:Netbook by AlecC · · Score: 1

      No, USB 3.0 is still copper. Early development went for optical, but that got dropped. Just 8 conductors instead of 4 in the cable.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    6. Re:Netbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Partially seconded - I just put a 10yo and a 15yo desktop to sleep, and they were not spectacular hardware. The only major difference: the 15yo one lacked both USB and PS/2 (never quite figured why for the second one :p )

    7. Re:Netbook by Bakkster · · Score: 1

      This leads to a good question, will a solid state hard drive survive 16 years without data corruption? If it is a platter hard drive, the best you are looking at is 8-10 years. The life span of platter drive decreases if it is not accessed.

      An SSD will almost certainly last 16 years, it just won't have any data left on it.

      A platter HDD might not run after 16 years, but the data will certainly still be there. Basically, keep the HDD in a static-safe bag with a little bag of dessicant to keep it dry and you can minimize the electonic and mechanical failures. And, even if the drive fails, it would be possible to recover the platters and their data, though only time will tell if that will get cheaper or more expensive with time. It's certainly the safer bet, though.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    8. Re:Netbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you use a netbook, be sure to get one with a Solid State Disk, not a mechanical hard disk. Anything mechanical can bind up, oxidize, or just plain crumble over time. Electronic parts all soldered together have the best chance of survival.

  6. first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you want to store digital data, use multiple device formats(a usb drive, a compact flash card, a CD, a DVD, blue ray, a sata hard drive) and make sure it gets stored the same way, audio in multiple formats, mp3, ogg, flac, wav. text should theoretically still be text in 16 years, but who knows? video the same way, as many formats as you can manage. then you hope that the storage devices survive long enough for her to stand a chance of reading any of them.

    Or, get yourself a netbook. put ubuntu on it. put the data on it, take the battery out, vacuum pack the works and store That. hopefully AC will still exist, and be close enough to what we have now to run the thing.

    1. Re:first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      provide a solar panel, inverter, analog battery-less voltmeter, and paper instructions on how to make batteries.

    2. Re:first? by AlecC · · Score: 0

      Add a solar powered battery charger. If the sun doesn't exist, the inability to decode this packages is one of the smaller problems she will have.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    3. Re:first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hopefully AC will still exist

      I will !

  7. Go digital by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some sort of Virtual Time Capsule with someone (you) as the keeper who is responsible for making sure the media is kept up to date. Obviously keeping a local and online copy of the same data. A few gigs of up-to-date memories shouldn't be that much work seeing as it's only 16 years. Figure a format conversion every 3-4 years, not too bad.

    The hardest part probably will be getting the rest of the family to convert their 'analog'-ish memories/thoughts/ideas into a digital medium.

    1. Re:Go digital by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      I agree with this. Put it all online somewhere and maintain it for 17 years. Really if you choose good formats for a website type of presentation, you might not have to do anything more than update the markup every 5 years or so.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    2. Re:Go digital by UncleWilly · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly.

      Isn't this really just a folder labeled "Cathy's Time Capsule 25-8-2025"; you can zip it up when it's complete and give everyone a copy. If you have deep pockets, you can add video iPods for everyone.

      Video is especially good, lots of "I was so skinny then..and had hair!"

    3. Re:Go digital by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      The only "problem" with this is that it's far less "romantic" than having an actual physical capsule that's been stored away for all those years, completely untouched.

      As for format conversions. Perhaps for small quantities, like sound or photo's, they could just be stored in a raw format (include a paper detailing the protocol). Movies will be a bit more difficult.

      That being said, 16 years really isn't that long. I could still buy the same, working C64 setup I started out on 18 years ago. Windows 95 is about 14 years old, and you can still run pretty much any program on a modern Windows PC. Floppy drives are still supported by the OS. The CD-ROM was introduced in 1986 (23 years ago!) and probably is still the most common media format in use. As long as your media survives 16 years, it's a pretty safe bet you'll be able to read it in 16 years.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    4. Re:Go digital by eredin · · Score: 1

      Lots of redundant copies that the family moves from system to system over time will probably give you the best chance of recovery. You can maintain the time capsule effect by password protecting that zip file and putting the password in the time capsule (engraved on something) along with the other standard time-capsule type stuff. She'll have that file kicking around on her computer for years, driving her nuts while she waits to get the password. I like it.

  8. just my 2c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    adding the appropriate player and instruction manuals? ;)

  9. Bow chicka wow wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    17 huh? how about a naked picture of me.....

    1. Re:Bow chicka wow wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need. You'll probably still have the same one on file as "current" at the dating service.

  10. MP4 Player by JohnHegarty · · Score: 0

    Put everything in a cheap MP4 player.

    If you are lucky some form of USB will still exist , and you can save off the date. If not you can play it on the player.

    Make sure you include an AC charger , just in case.

    1. Re:MP4 Player by Tuoqui · · Score: 1

      Clearly you need to include some sort of hand cranking device... Just in case civilization collapses and the electrical grid was taken out and they need to repopulate the world with little Billy from next door.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
    2. Re:MP4 Player by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      How do you get around the fact that Flash memory will self erase in about 7-10 years. You want him to store it in a liquid helium bath to slow the decay of the memory to extend it an additional 7 years to just make it to her 17th birthday?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:MP4 Player by mjwx · · Score: 1

      If you are lucky some form of USB will still exist ,

      In 20 years, of course it will.

      20 years ago the RS232 port was common place, now days I can buy USB to RS232 adapters with ease. Just because we dont put RS232 on to the back of every PC and laptop does not make it hard to find. same with LPT ports, converters still exist. If USB is surpassed (perhaps I should say when) there will be converters for it as there is so much equipment running from USB (Yes, I still have two bits of equipment that are only connected by RS232, I use USB to RS232 converters).

      Just use DVD. Good optical media will last for decades if properly stored. In 16 years there will still be a DVD drive for an old PC, they've been around for a decade and aren't going anywhere soon.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  11. iPods are cheaper and cheaper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not include the necessary hardware? Collect everyone's data, and load it onto a small video-compatible media player with included headphones. Surely it'll need a charge, but I can't imagine THAT technology will have changed.

    1. Re:iPods are cheaper and cheaper... by Otto · · Score: 1

      Won't work. Hard drives won't last that long without movement/use, and flash drives leak charge over time. Any transient storage medium won't last that long.

      You need something not sensitive to light, magnetic fields, and which doesn't rely on electric charges. So, I'd say to not bother with stuff you can do at home.

      Go to a print house, where they can make actual pressed discs, and get your data actually pressed onto CD's or DVD's. Burning isn't the same thing, and won't last even if it's in the dark the whole time. A full out disc will last a long time, and the hardware to read CDs still exists today, even though the CD was introduced in 1982. It's a format with staying power.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  12. Perhaps... by Shrike82 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Put it all on a USB memory stick, and when you next come to buy a new PC or laptop simply keep the old one in a box somewhere (suitably protected against dust and moisture). If for some reason in 16 years you find that USB sticks have become obselete and your files are totally outdated you can just get the old equipment out, fire it up and you're all set.

    --
    You can advertise in this sig from as little as £99.99 a month!
    1. Re:Perhaps... by martas · · Score: 1

      better yet, upload all the data to Google and store only the (randomly generated) password to the account in the capsule.

    2. Re:Perhaps... by Xiph1980 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, and there's absolutely no chance that google won't exist in 15 years....

      --
      Manuals are your last resort only
    3. Re:Perhaps... by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As odd as it may sound, this may be one of the more sophisticated ideas.

      Yes, many services fold over times. Just use all of them. At least one will probably survive. It might pay, though, to keep monitoring such services and move the data if you happen to run out of backups. But that, essentially, perverts the idea of a time capsule. The interesting part of opening such a thing isn't just the old info, it's the very idea that these old parts have been sitting there for years/decades, untouched and stored.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Perhaps... by martas · · Score: 2, Funny

      of course not. gods are eternal.

    5. Re:Perhaps... by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Bad idea.

      Data on USB sticks decays in several years.

    6. Re:Perhaps... by Shrike82 · · Score: 1

      You have a source for that? Constant reading and writing can degrade flash memory, of course, but do you have any source that empirically proves that Solid State memory suffers from data decay over time? All I can find is hearsay and random forum guessing.

      --
      You can advertise in this sig from as little as £99.99 a month!
    7. Re:Perhaps... by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      And that's a Thordamned fact!

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    8. Re:Perhaps... by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Yes. Flash memory cell is basically a capacitor, and it slowly leaks (because dielectrics are not perfect), no guesses here. Lifetime of data varies between 5 and 10 years.

      I'm too lazy to google for papers, so here is the top search result:
      http://www.nowpublic.com/tech-biz/gonna-live-forever-flash-memory-slower-decay

    9. Re:Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've just reduced the Time Capsule concept to that of a Coca-Cola bottlecap game. "Go to www.crapcontest.com and enter this 16 digit code to see if you're a loser!"

    10. Re:Perhaps... by NonSequor · · Score: 1

      Thor doesn't damn. He smites.

      So I think the word you're looking for is "thorsmitten".

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    11. Re:Perhaps... by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Well Osiris curse me, you're right!

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    12. Re:Perhaps... by Shrike82 · · Score: 1

      Yeah I already saw that result in my own searching, but again I think that is more to do with an average amount of reading and writing from the drive and degradation of memory cells over time rather than how long data will last if the flash drive isn't used. This is the weird thing - nowhere have I been able to find a decent piece about "bit rot" in solid state memory flash drives. I'm actually intrigued now. I do understand that charge can leak from an imperfect capacitance medium, but is it a few milliamps a month or more like one picoamp a year?

      --
      You can advertise in this sig from as little as £99.99 a month!
  13. Keep it simple by Linker3000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Get a plain writing book with acid-free paper and each write a personal story, message, commentary etc. Attach photos on stable stock paper together with personal items such as a slip of wallpaper or slither of wood etc. from her first bedroom, a dried flower from the garden, small items that conjure up the day/year she was born etc.

      Store in a sealed box in a dry, safe, dust-free environment

    Much more unique, personal and tactile. /Even geeks need to know when to stop

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
    1. Re:Keep it simple by gafisher · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well said. Recordings of any sort will be available independently if they have merit -- we can watch "Casablanca" or listen to Caruso though the media on which they were generated, and even the media on which our parents experienced them, are gone. Far better to recommend a performance and let the recipient search it out than to include a recording likely to become unusable. The exception is personal recordings such as home movies or spoken greetings; if these are to be part of the "bequest" then for each item include in the time capsule a promise from a family member who will keep a currently playable version; it will be far more meaningful for the recipient to seek out Uncle Alex to hear Great-Grandma's greeting, Aunt Mary for the home movie of the First Birthday party, etc. This keeps the family actively involved as well as at least promoting, though not ensuring, a reunion of sorts when the Time Capsule comes due and becomes not just a box of old stuff but a *living* inheritance.

    2. Re:Keep it simple by Five+Bucks! · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the reality check...

      For my folks, 60s music has certainly not disappeared - it's ubiquitous. If the recording is worth keeping, it will be done by the record industry.

      Physical artifacts are more important; not digital works that can be duplicated.

      --
      52 52'23" W 47 32'07" N
    3. Re:Keep it simple by doomy · · Score: 1

      Good idea,

      In addition, I suggest everyone write in binary so images and media can be preserved as well.

      --
      ...free your source and the rest would follow...
    4. Re:Keep it simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This attitude (which can be summarised as "Maybe an antibiotic would cure you, but this dogshit was just outside the door, so we're going to try dogshit") is pointless. Technology exists to be used.

      She's going to be a teenager. The book goes in a dusty pile never to be seen again.

      The digital media won't get any more respect, but it doesn't need respect, it's impervious. "Look at this crap we dug up" with a hyperlink from her video blog sucks all that stuff forward in time by 16 years. "Bec, is that your mum in the old time video?" "No Jak, um, it's not full 'notated, it was on like, physical media. But it's from 2008, I think it's my grandmother's first re-marriage". "Who is the guy ?" "It's probably my step-granddad." "Your grandma was het?" "It's practically last century, I think everyone was het back then Jak".

    5. Re:Keep it simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To add to your list of grammatical sins, please note for the future that "unique" is a binary state, and therefore modifying it with intensifiers such as "much more" is meaningless. By definition, either something is unique, or it is not, so just say it is unique and move on. Or in this case, don't, since it is not unique, much less "more unique".

    6. Re:Keep it simple by cptdondo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      +1. My father in law knew he was dying for several years, so he spent a part of that time on a round-the-world trip, revisiting all the places that were important to him. Then he compiled several albums, with original pictures from his youth, newer pictures from his trip, and stories about what those places meant to him. It's an incredibly powerful document, and it's the best thing he could have left for his grandkids, all the more so because in this age of high mobility and disposable housing we no longer have family histories.

    7. Re:Keep it simple by DocTBone · · Score: 1

      Include a laptop with the CD.

      --
      To swim, only to die at the edge.
    8. Re:Keep it simple by txoof · · Score: 1

      This is the reason I print out the best-of-the-best of my digital photos. I want to be able to flip through those memories in 40 years and not worry about finding a DVD player that doesn't even exist in spec. form any more. I love that I can go through my grandmother's negatives, letters and other memories with the aide of only the sun.

      Digital is great, but I don't see archeologists digging up a 5.25" floppy 2000 years from now and saying, "WHOA! It's Hammurabi Code!" More likely they'll say, "damn, they made a lot of crap back when."

      --
      This one's tricky. You have to use imaginary numbers, like eleventeen... --Hobbes
    9. Re:Keep it simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There should at least be a mix of non-data items and data items. Imagine your niece's disappointment if nothing was usable on her 17th! Guarantee that at least *some* things will last that long.

    10. Re:Keep it simple by Bakkster · · Score: 1

      Personal recordings are fantastic, as long as there's still a way to play them later. This is something that can not be replaced by a written greeting.

      After my grandfather passed away several years ago, we found some old vinyl recordings sent as an audio greeting to my grandmother while he was stationed in the Aleutian Islands. We're still looking for a way to transfer them, since they're not a standard rotational speed in use anymore. Needless to say, I don't think we'd care nearly as much if the records were big band songs.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    11. Re:Keep it simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the best suggestion so far. Tactile, physical items have a lot more of a connection to the person leaving them versus digital files.

    12. Re:Keep it simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a plain writing book with acid-free paper

      Or just burn your message into a twinkie

    13. Re:Keep it simple by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 1

      We're still looking for a way to transfer them, since they're not a standard rotational speed in use anymore.

      Transfer them at a standard speed and use software to adjust the speed and pitch. This forum thread shows how to do it in Garage Band and mentions several alternatives.

    14. Re:Keep it simple by gafisher · · Score: 1

      Yes, those old recordings become obsolete more quickly than we'd expect. That was the point I tried (but failed) to make in suggesting "caretakers" for each recording; my intent was that these "caretakers" would not simply store the media but keep the content accessible.

      Had someone been in that role with your Grandfather's recordings, they might have had those transferred to a more current format when it became apparent the older format was becoming inaccessible (while saving the old media, of course). If this had been done and carried on, today you might have the original recordings, 45RPM transcriptions, cassettes, and perhaps a set of mp3 files. When those appear to be on the way out you might transfer the oldest accessible form to crystalline media or whatever else may be down the road, preserving the recordings for the next generation.

      Don't give up on your Grandfather's recordings, by the way. Any competent recording Engineer can extract the audio; maybe someone on /. is close enough to you to give you a hand if you ask.

    15. Re:Keep it simple by Bakkster · · Score: 1

      We're still looking for a way to transfer them, since they're not a standard rotational speed in use anymore.

      Transfer them at a standard speed and use software to adjust the speed and pitch. This forum thread shows how to do it in Garage Band and mentions several alternatives.

      Yeah, that was the idea. The only holdup, last I checked, was finding the hardware to play and record them with relatively little noise. I understand the post-processing, being a musician with some home recording background and an electrical engineer, but I don't have access to the record and a turntable.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    16. Re:Keep it simple by rockNme2349 · · Score: 1

      Keep it simple.

      Take all the files you want and send them to a zip archive.

      Encode the archive into base-64 and carve it into stone tablets.

      Should survive hundreds of years. It's good to know that in a hundred years someone will have opened it and decoded it only to find a video of rick astley forever preserved in time.

      --
      Sewage Treatment Facilities - "Our duty is clear."
    17. Re:Keep it simple by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Can't you just use a standard turntable and adjust the speed after digitising?

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    18. Re:Keep it simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know for several years I am dying as well, as does everyone else. You are not aware of your own morality?

    19. Re:Keep it simple by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      I agree, the only true test of time are books. Real physical things with writing on them.

      Tech comes and goes, and at the increased rate changes are occurring, in another 15 years, todays tech will barely be a memory.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  14. Why put data in a capsule? by lena_10326 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Physical objects should go into the capsule, not data. The reason we do that is because it's difficult to keep archived objects pristine and from getting lost. With data, you can store it in multiple places and always retrieve a bit for bit exact copy. Not so with physical objects.

    --
    Camping on quad since 1996.
    1. Re:Why put data in a capsule? by eugene2k · · Score: 1

      >Physical objects should go into the capsule, not data.
      I second that, though for different reasons. You cannot guarantee that any storage medium that exists now will exist in 16 years. Also, you cannot guarantee that the electrical outlets won't change, so you can't put a netbook in there either. It's best to simply do it the old way.

      --
      Apple has "Mac vs PC", Microsoft has "Laptop Hunters", Linux has recession
    2. Re:Why put data in a capsule? by maxume · · Score: 1

      You can assume electrical outlets won't change in 16 years. If you aren't prepared to assume that, you can assume that adapters will be available. Maybe not if you are negotiating a peace treaty with the ants, but for a family time capsule, those assumptions are perfectly safe.

      Consumer grade storage that will last that long is a different trick (I would probably put in some burned DVDs and a USB drive, and then, in a horrible clever trick, maintain a copy of the data outside of the time capsule, to provide when the media fails).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Why put data in a capsule? by Orange+Crush · · Score: 1

      Preserve the data by periodically refreshing it. Burn some discs now, and keep copies on a live computer. Every few years, verify and burn to new discs.

    4. Re:Why put data in a capsule? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electrical outlets may change? A new outlet may well be invented and become the new standard, but the existing outlets are already in every home and building connected to the grid, and every electronic device is manufactured to fit those outlets. The odds that they will be gone in 16 years, and that there will not be a cheap adapter available, are zero.

    5. Re:Why put data in a capsule? by Barny · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A step further, fork out for some hosting, pay 20yrs in advance, set up a web page that has a "enter the password here" kinda thing, then put the password on a piece of acid free paper with the URL (don't forget to buy a domain).

      But if thats too much effort, you could, i dunno, write something on paper, sticks some photos in it, and maybe some memorabilia.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    6. Re:Why put data in a capsule? by GravityStar · · Score: 1

      In 20 years time, the hosting company will have changed names 4 times, had 6 database outages completely wiping the Mysql DB, and have changed the location to the htdocs no less than 3 times.

      In addition, when the site is accessed in 20 years, there will be a dns error.

      I wish I was joking.

    7. Re:Why put data in a capsule? by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

      Websites behave like lemmings. They are ever marching toward some cliff, falling over, and dying. It requires persistent human guidance to prevent that from happening.

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
    8. Re:Why put data in a capsule? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electrical outlets may change? A new outlet may well be invented and become the new standard, but the existing outlets are already in every home and building connected to the grid, and every electronic device in North America is manufactured to fit those outlets. The odds that they will be gone in 16 years, and that there will not be a cheap adapter available, are zero.

      There, fixed that for you. I agree it would take more than 16 years just for the bureaucrats to argue about the shape, voltage, and frequency, let alone the actual changeover time; but if we could shift to a world standard, it would sure make things easier.

  15. Paper. by CdXiminez · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Write it down.
    I can still read a book a hundred years old, I can't read a C64-floppy twenty years old.

    1. Re:Paper. by martas · · Score: 1

      Multiple members of my family want to contribute digital data â" text, video, music files.

      right, write it all down... in binary.

    2. Re:Paper. by psykopatpastorn · · Score: 1

      the floppies are allright

    3. Re:Paper. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Your point being?

      What is writing? Encoding of information. Nothing else. You take information, you formulate it in words, you use an alphabet of letter (or symbols representing syllables or words, depending on your alphabet) and you write those down.

      The most sensible way to long-term store this kind of information would actually be a printout of the hexdump along with a format description how it can be decoded again.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Paper. by CdXiminez · · Score: 1

      Point in being: don't go all fancy with audio and video. A message from person to person gets across centuries by writing extremely well.

    5. Re:Paper. by rmm311 · · Score: 1

      Paipr? Im sry, i cnt undrstnd u, plz spk n mdrn txt

    6. Re:Paper. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't read a C64-floppy twenty years old

      Have you tried? I recently transferred all my old BBC Micro games and stuff to my PC. The floppies were all written between 1983 and 1989, and only 5 out of about 150 had read errors.

      On the other hand, if I hadn't had a 5.25" drive I would have been screwed.

    7. Re:Paper. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that explains why we as a nation hold the digital copies of The Constitution and the Declaration of Independence so sacred and don't really care if anything happens to the originals. Oh, wait, the originals are kept in a national archive. My bad. Writing, for the purpose of giving something to a girl 15 years into the future is MUCH more than just encoding of information. What if the original poster is dead by then. A picture of the two of them, printed, and aged over the years will mean more. Sure, Include the digital filel as well, so if something happens to the original. Handwrite anything you wwant to say, don't send an e-mail. Unless the girl turns out to be a real geek, she'll appreciate the handwritten note more than a typed, or worse, dictated, one. Sure, geeks don't mind a Thank You e-mail, but the rest of the world wants something a bit more personal.

    8. Re:Paper. by jmitchel!jmitchel.co · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll bet you can read an ISO9660 CD that's 15 years old. If it's not hopelessly scratched, anyway.

    9. Re:Paper. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you weren't a fucking illiterate American you might understand how a fucking book works, they're not written in 1's and 0's. Stop being willfully fucking stupid.

    10. Re:Paper. by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      I can't read a C64-floppy twenty years old.

      Yes, you can.
      http://www.jschoenfeld.com/products/catweasel_e.htm

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    11. Re:Paper. by CdXiminez · · Score: 1

      I have. A lot still read on my C128. I haven't managed to make a modem between my C128 and Mac work to transfer the files. Catweazle requires a PC and engineering, possible but not easy.

      There seems no easy accessible way of reading them out-of-the-box, which is what you will want with a time capsule.

    12. Re:Paper. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can read a C64-floppy, you just haven't tried.

    13. Re:Paper. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can use binary... I think I'll use hex...

    14. Re:Paper. by spinkham · · Score: 1

      Right. Everyone cites the fact that all the crap before standardization is a pain to read, ignoring the fact that a CD or IDE hard drive with plain text, gif, or jpgs from 15 years ago will be readable just fine with most computers out there. Worst case they'd need to buy a $10 IDE card if they have SATA only.

      USB, sata, and DVDs with html, plain text, PNG, GIf, jpegs, mp3s and mpeg2 video will probably be similarly easily accessible 15 years from now.

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
    15. Re:Paper. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should've used the green highlighter around the edges, so the bits stay super sharp.

    16. Re:Paper. by adolf · · Score: 1

      If we're still fucking stuck with SATA 15 years from now, I'm leaving. I'm fucking serious.

    17. Re:Paper. by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Well, pressing a single CD would cost a lot.

    18. Re:Paper. by spinkham · · Score: 1

      There will probably be "sata 5.0", which might or might not be backwards compatible, but there will certainly be sata cards available for cheap which will work with your computer. The SATA install base is too large to disappear completely in that span of time.

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
    19. Re:Paper. by adolf · · Score: 1

      Is it too large?

      MFM, RLL, and ESDI all died within about that timespan. Nobody missed them, and nobody (other than a few frail old geeks) has hardware to work with them.

      Hard drives don't last forever, and nor do their interface standards.

    20. Re:Paper. by spinkham · · Score: 1

      I have MFM and RLL cards still, and a 386 somewhere that will use them. Obviously that's not the case for most people, but I'm not frail or old, just a geek. ;-)
      However, you're comparing comparatively small run, early hardware with modern hardware. MFM controllers were complicated for the day, (S)ATA controllers are relatively simple.

      Also, the (S)ATA specs currently use 48 bit LBA, allowing for 128 PB per drive.
      Assuming the HD capacity doubles every 3 years(about right based on http://www.mattscomputertrends.com/harddrives.html) starting from 2TB today, the largest HDs will be 64TB in 15 years. Coincidently, if we take a 256GB SSD and apply Moore's law, we get 32TB in 15 years. Both give a factor of 2000-4000 smaller then SATA interface allows.

      In 15 years, I'm willing to bet you can buy an add in card for $30 or less, inflation adjusted, that will let you read a SATA II disk from today, if that functionality isn't still built into the motherboard of most computers.

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
    21. Re:Paper. by adolf · · Score: 1

      It's still an ugly bet. :)

      SATA has only been popular for a few years. It is, I'd say, too early to tell how well it will survive, no matter what its specifications are. IDE's various limitations also seemed very far-fetched at the time they were established. 128PB seems like a lot, sure -- more than anyone will ever need. We used to feel the same about 8 gig IDE drives.

      And remember: Firewire seems to be on life support these days, too, despite being superior in every way to USB.

      Personally, I'm looking for a unified portable/internal interface to pop up and become immensely popular any time now. It's dumb that we have SATA, eSATA, and USB for storage. The world needs one small connector, with power by default, to transfer data with whatever, that is perceived to be both fast and usable within an enclosure or on a keychain.

      If this happens, SATA will die.

      Just an idea.

  16. USB by Leynos · · Score: 1

    I think a USB mass storage device will probably be quite safe, given that RS-232 and IDE are still fairly common despite being far more than 16 years old.

    USB mass storage devices have pretty much entrenched themselves in the modern day psyche as the de-facto replacement for the floppy disc.

    My guess is that even if we are on USB 5.0 or whatever by then, there will still be some form of backwards compatibility in place (cf the b/c employed in USB 3.0).

    Online storage may be ubiquitous in 16 years time, but there will always be computers without access to the internet somewhere in the world, for whom removable storage will be a necessity.

    --
    "Did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage?"
    1. Re:USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, a storage device with RS232 capability might be a good idea - it's slow, but is so simple to handle that a future programmer shouldn't have any trouble writing something to decipher it (you can describe binary and include an ASCII chart, should someone decide to have a crack at it in 200 years).

  17. use the internet by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

    Why bother finding a medium and risk damage to it? Just upload your content somewhere (or multiple places) it can't get lost. Or have the waybackmachine archive it. Then put the link(s) on a piece of paper, laminate it and you're good to go.

    1. Re:use the internet by idhx · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I'd be ill at ease if I were to retreive data that was stored somewhere on the internet 16 years ago. Things move to fast on the net for this to be a good solution

    2. Re:use the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google may help find it early, and could open up privacy concerns. Take it one step further to prevent early retrieval: Encrypt the data and put the decryption key on the paper. Then just hope that technology doesn't advance to the point that it can be cracked before the date the capsule is opened.

    3. Re:use the internet by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

      I can see see geocities pages from years ago :P

      But if that's a problem, just rent some space with a good provider and put your content there.

      You can also encrypt the content and put the passphrase on the sheet of paper in the capsule.

    4. Re:use the internet by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      I am going to laugh so hard when the services you suggested go the way of Friendster and AOL Hometown.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    5. Re:use the internet by ericlondaits · · Score: 1

      It's not the same nowadays. He can store the photos in Facebook, where even if they are deleted they'll still be accesible.

      --
      As a Slashdot discussion grows longer, the probability of an analogy involving cars approaches one.
    6. Re:use the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why put the links on paper?
      Cut a metal can open and etch the links there, that will outlive all of us for sure.

      Also, the chance that Wayback is still around in this time frame is doubtful as well.
      What if the owner died? What if the site (physical site) was destroyed in some way? (fire, war, comet...)

      Although i do agree with you, upload it to loads of places online, it is what i do.
      Gmail, Windows Live Storage, Rapidshare, Megalupload, Slashdot >_>

  18. Bundle the hardware by idhx · · Score: 1

    Since you mention photos and music, why don't you just bundle the necessary hardware : you could put all the music and audio in an mp3 player, the photos one one of those digital frames, or just get an archos or something that does it all. I don't think it should be too difficult to find a correct power source in 16 years. Though obviously, if you want to be able to retrieve the data from the hardware, as opposed to just playing / watching / ... it, that would be more difficult.

  19. virtual machines by martas · · Score: 0, Redundant

    store a virtual machine (in an open format) along with the data, containing all the software necessary to view the media they want to include. then 16 years from now, only 2 things will be needed to make it all work - VM software that uses that open format, and hardware that can read whatever storage device you decide to use.

  20. player itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you want to stay with digital data, put it on datatape and bury the player along with the tape and a cheap laptop ready configured for the tapeplayer. Don't forget to take the batteries out, since that'll kill the system in two years.

    If you want to make it more durable, make it airtight and make sure the air in there has as low humidity as possible (diver shops that can fill tanks have a pressure system that dries the air completely before filling them into the bottles). This eliminates corrosion.

    Good luck!

  21. With the cut price components used these days... by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    ... I wouldn't want to lay money on the electronics still working in 16 years time (gone off electrolytic capacitors being the most likely) and thats before you have to worry about the mechanical components of the hard drive seizing up through lack of use not to mention the data becoming corrupted as the magnetism on the disk slowly changes. And similarly even if you use a netbook with an SSD theres a good chance it would have lost or corrupted enough data by then to make it crash prone or even unbootable.

  22. Punch-cards by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    ...are fine for text if you don't want to use pen and paper (or can't remember how). You don't even need a machine to read punch-cards - you can do it by eyeball pretty easily though it might take a little while...

  23. Slashdot account by auric_dude · · Score: 5, Funny

    Open an account for her right now and place the username password combination in the time capsule. Once 17 she will then be able to ask slashdot how to read all the ancient media and have a geekish low account number when viewed fro 16 years into the future.

    1. Re:Slashdot account by Odinlake · · Score: 1

      will someone with points mod this post up for me :-P

    2. Re:Slashdot account by Lally+Singh · · Score: 4, Funny

      They're not worth as much as you think...

      --
      Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
    3. Re:Slashdot account by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Funny

      Damn...

    4. Re:Slashdot account by consonant · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just like us early-adopter sub-mega-UID folks!

    5. Re:Slashdot account by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Here we go...let's just get this "who has the lowest UID" pissing game out of the way :-)

    6. Re:Slashdot account by rve · · Score: 3, Funny

      They're not worth as much as you think...

      Oi! I paid half a million dollar for mine on eBay!

    7. Re:Slashdot account by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      I fail.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    8. Re:Slashdot account by maxume · · Score: 1

      That contest is already running up here:

      http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1346203&cid=29183897

      Currently at 3 digits...

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    9. Re:Slashdot account by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I was hoping a two-digit would reply, but we got a 3.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    10. Re:Slashdot account by az1324 · · Score: 0

      Not so fast. I'm onto your evil plan to lure a 17 y.o. girl to Slashdot.


      16 years into the future:

      auric_dude: Oh hi there are you new to slashdot? Can i show you around (Using VR of course. auric_dude has hacked a young studly avatar)?
      me: (superhero entrance) Aha! I've been waiting 16 years for this moment! (exposes auric_dude's true avatar)
      17 y.o. girl: I've waited 16 years for this moment?!? ::logout::

    11. Re:Slashdot account by neo · · Score: 1

      Whoa.

      You paid to much. You can get a three digit account for like $20.

    12. Re:Slashdot account by MassacrE · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wait, I could earn $20 ??

    13. Re:Slashdot account by natet · · Score: 1

      I plan on passing my slashdot account on to my children. That way, people will see a six figure number and think they're just an old curmudgen and ignore them. Kids need opposition to learn and grow.

      --
      IANAL... But I play one on /.
    14. Re:Slashdot account by msantosn · · Score: 0

      Who has the longest?
      Remember: Size does matter!

    15. Re:Slashdot account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, YouTube with the title "Fat kid on bicycle11!! Lolzors!" and torrent it with the title "Midget porn" and you'll never lose it.

    16. Re:Slashdot account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canadian or American?

    17. Re:Slashdot account by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      can a 5 digit get me at least $4? I was thinking about getting some coffee...

    18. Re:Slashdot account by KevCo · · Score: 1

      I'd happily sell you a lower one for half that!

    19. Re:Slashdot account by Erbo · · Score: 1

      Heh...I love those silly little games :-)

      --
      Be who you are...and be it in style!
    20. Re:Slashdot account by numberone+(1) · · Score: 1

      Depends how low your number is..

    21. Re:Slashdot account by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      Dammit, I lose this one every time. Last time it was a 2-digit guy, though. Haven't seen one of those in a while.

    22. Re:Slashdot account by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 1

      They may not be, but the signature to uid values are quite interesting...

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    23. Re:Slashdot account by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Oi! I paid half a million dollar for mine on eBay!

      Zimbabwe dollars.

      and you overpaid.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  24. If it's data by Andtalath · · Score: 2, Informative

    Then it should be stored redundantly in several locations, online and off-line and should be checked at several points.

    An actual time-box is not a good idea at all since all tech has a risk of going bad even if not used.

  25. Standards!!! by MathFox · · Score: 1

    For the data format: stick to documented standards. ASCII or UTF-8 Unicode will do great for the text of a document; (X)HTML is likely to be available too; PDF maybe. For pictures I'ld bet on JPEG or an uncompressed RGB format, for moving images on MPEG2. There is nothing wrong with storing files in multiple formats for redundancy.
    The medium is another issue. Would a CD-R be readable after 15 years? A CD-RW may be more reliable, but can you find a CD-ROM player at that time? A USB stick or SD card are "new" media where readers are likely to be available, but little is known about long-term data persistence. Having a backup of the data on an actively backed up computer does not sound like a bad idea at all.

    Summary: with more baskets, the likelihood of remaining eggs increases.

    --
    extern warranty;
    main()
    {
    (void)warranty;
    }
    1. Re:Standards!!! by Tuoqui · · Score: 1

      Considering DVD players are backwards compatible with CDs and the Blu-Ray type things are backwards compatible with DVDs and CD's I'd say yes there would be a method to read a CD 15 years from now.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
    2. Re:Standards!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blue-ray is not backwards compatible with DVD, because it is compleetly diffrent

    3. Re:Standards!!! by ricegf · · Score: 1

      Y'know, this got me thinking. I'm a digital pack rat, so I looked for the oldest file on my computer. It's COSMIC.WP from 1989, the rules for a game my friends and I created in college, in WordPerfect 4.2 for DOS format.

      Just to watch the meltdown, I double-clicked the file. OpenOffice.org opened it without a problem. Even the ASCII-formatted tables look right.

      Wow.

  26. Physical media? How noughties by kobotronic · · Score: 1

    If stored properly, I would expect a conventional 'archival grade' DVD to be readable - at least have recoverable data - in that time. However, in 16 years few teenagers or even private households will have any use or exposure to physical media of any kind - blue-ray, DVDs and CDs relics of pre-wired times on par with 78rpm discs and dead sea scrolls. Only greybearded nerds and specialty data recovery / conversion places will probably even have operational, attached optical drives. Teenagers certainly won't. The 2025 equivalent to cellphones and cloud services will cover all their data access needs. But - it will be possible to find a data conversion place in a nearby stripmall that for a modest charge will copy contents of optical media to your account. Expect intellectual property zombies to have agents monitoring such recovery processes and possibly interfering with any licensed content you might choose to include.

    1. Re:Physical media? How noughties by Shrike82 · · Score: 1

      Expect intellectual property zombies to have agents monitoring such recovery processes and possibly interfering with any licensed content you might choose to include.

      So you're predicting that within the next 16 years the film and music industry will begin using the undead in their war against copyright infringement? A bold prediction my friend...bold indeed.

      --
      You can advertise in this sig from as little as £99.99 a month!
    2. Re:Physical media? How noughties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hadn't realised until I read that comment that the teenagers of the mid-2020's are being born right now. There's something terrifying about that thought. I'm not supposed to feel old yet, I'm only 21!

    3. Re:Physical media? How noughties by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      It's ok, the teenagers of 2060 haven't even had their parents born yet.

    4. Re:Physical media? How noughties by txoof · · Score: 1

      Accellerando much?

      I just finished it the other day and while the writing was not spectacularly wonderful, his predictions of the future based on the current state of technology is fascinating. I find myself firing off browser tabs to look up something and wishing that I could send my "ghost" out to look it up for me.

      I find the idea of turning our beautiful home into computronium a little bleak though. I hope we never find ourselves in that boat. Well, I probably won't live to see it any how.

      --
      This one's tricky. You have to use imaginary numbers, like eleventeen... --Hobbes
    5. Re:Physical media? How noughties by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      This is totally 100% wrong. On the bright side, there's a good chance I'll be able to search this up via a search engine and gloat to myself.

      CFALCON ARCHIVE

  27. An incandescent light bulb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They will be outlawed in 16 years, for sure - and probably be quite the collector's items.

  28. Port your favorite.. by Lally+Singh · · Score: 1

    x86 emulator to the Apple IIc, then put one in the box. It's the only way to be sure.

    --
    Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
  29. 16 years by ledow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, think what was around 16 years ago (1993) and project forward:

    The compact disc had been invented for a little over 13 years and was still going strong (and would do until five-ten years after that).

    Thinkpads were available with CD etc. (although we're talking 486's here because the Pentium was JUST coming out)

    So if you dug up an old 486 with some CD's now, how hard would it be to get running? How hard if your particular units didn't work? Not very.

    Now project 16 years into the future - buy yourself some *new* reliable technology (CD was in its infancy as a computer format in 1993). Make it as standard and popular as possible. Throw in a device that's still likely to be passed around on second-hand websites like eBay just in case. Hell, I can still buy ZX Spectrums for little more than a few dollars, and that was 25 years ago. Hedge your bets... use a Blu-Ray AND DVD for everything you want to put in there. Throw in some Windows / Linux / Open Source / freeware to read the data (don't do a BBC Domesday project and have to decode the software as well as find the hardware).

    If you wanna be ultra-sure... throw in a Gumstix or something small and capable of playing the media (you could use USB memory in this case, or CompactFlash or similar). Hardware easily survives 16 years if you look after it or don't touch it. The data media may not (especially writable media) so project it forward with each transition of your own personal data.

    And most importantly - backup, backup, backup. Include *two* of each device, and two copies of the data in two different media, on two seperate discs/flashs and keep a copy on your home machine to "upgrade" to the next new format.

    1. Re:16 years by tgd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      First, when I think about what I was doing in 1993 and you point out it was 16 years ago, you just make me feel old.

      Thanks a lot.

      Second, I wouldn't project the pace things changed in the last 16 years to the pace they're going to change in the next 16. Half of that time was still before the massive explosion in computer usage. 16 years ago computers were a "nerd" interest. Some of us had Internet, and some colleges had it available to students, but most people were using BBS's or other dial-up destination services. Computers were uncommon.

      Today, new technologies come and go in the matter of years. Technology uptake is multiples faster than it was 16 years ago. Even basic things like interface types are starting to vanish. Firewire? SCSI? Parallel ports? Floppy drives? CDs are starting to fade, less than ten years after the use of them for recordable storage became practical. Even DVD recording is starting to fade because media has gotten too big for DVDs.

      I wouldn't assume for a moment that any hardware or media today will work on a computer 16 years from now. USB 3/4/5 may have some backwards compatibility, but wireless connectivity and higher bandwidth standards will show up, and there will be a point that going 3-4 revisions back on a standard just won't happen. Your USB flash drive won't work anymore. Bandwidth into homes and dropping flash prices will almost certainly eliminate optical storage by that time. They're already too small for backups, and useless for most people for music playback. My video camera *today* can shoot video big enough to fill a dual layer DVD in 15 minutes.

      IMO, putting digital content in a time capsule is a waste of time. The odds are SO low that it'll be readable in 16 years without someone tracking down very old hardware to use, I think they're better off putting physical things that mean something in there.

    2. Re:16 years by khakipuce · · Score: 1

      Why not encode any media files with open source software and keep the source - I mean all the source, libraries, the lot (even the source for the compiler...) - there will be compiliers for mainstream languages around for a long time to come. Store all of this on a whole heap of storeage media (it's all pretty cheap so use everything you can get from mag tape, disks, etc to on-line storeage) ... what could possibly go wrong???

      --
      Art is the mathematics of emotion
    3. Re:16 years by arcade · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm sorry, but the computer explosion started around 1993. :) And about technologies.. the REAL floppy drives was dead in 1993. Actually, two generations of floppy drives were dead..

      - Furthermore, disk drives. They were no longer huge behemoths, but small nifty ones.
      - Remember 8250 UART serial ports? Long dead.
      - Remember 2400bps modems? Long dead. How about accoustic couplers?
      - We had pensioned CGA and EGA - and gone for VGA by 1993. SVGA came soon afterwards.

      New technologies came and went darn fast back in 1993, just as they do now. Hell, back in 1993, 286 machines were going unusable. These days I have no problems using a machine from 9 years ago thinking it's fast enough. In 1993, using a computer from 1984 was a painful experience. Back then, I had a need to upgrade my CPU, my hard-drives, and so forth every so often - since they were quite simply not fast enough.

      These days, on the other hand, I still am quite happy with almost a decade old machines, chugging around for various tasks. They're more than fast enough.

      In short, I don't think 16 years old technology will be much of a problem. I think it'll be less of a problem with technology bought "now", than it is now with technology from 1993..

      --
      "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
    4. Re:16 years by xonen · · Score: 1

      It's pretty ironic that we call this 'Information Technology' if we aren't able to do perform a very basic task like storing information..

      I don't share this pessimistic view though, i think spreading the material on several different media (cd/dvd/usb) would most likely solve it. If i look at the crap i collected last 10-15 year, i doubt i'l live without a CD-ROM player in 16 years. Actually, the one i once bought around 1995 is still just working fine and can connect with no problems to any IDE bus around on modern motherboards... Don't try hook up another modern device on same cable, that's all really.
      I certainly agree with others here that legacy is too important to just drop support for old formats. I wouldnt care if my PC is a 100 or 1000 times faster in 15 years, but i do care if i can still watch my 20 year old digital holiday pictures. And most like millions of others think the same. If people only cared gigaherzes, they wouldnt use modern cellphones and netbooks, right? People care applications, not hardware. The market will follow without problem.

      --
      A glitch a day keeps the bugs away.
    5. Re:16 years by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Throw in some Windows / Linux / Open Source / freeware to read the data (don't do a BBC Domesday project and have to decode the software as well as find the hardware).

      Hmmm... therein lies the problem.

      I wouldn't like to bet that a given piece of software produced in 1993 - even if it was produced for a well-known system like Windows - would work on a modern Windows XP machine. It should - but I'm sure we've all seen cases of software not being quite as backward-compatible as we'd like.

      Linux doesn't usually aim for binary compatibility across very long periods of time - that's what source code exists for. And a live CD such as Knoppix (so they don't need to worry about OS compatibility) simply changes it from being a software compatibility issue to a hardware compatibility issue.

    6. Re:16 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with digital technologies is that they are either mature enough that the selection is clear, but you can't count on long-term longevity (picking 8-Track in 1975) or too new that you can't count on future market share.

      You suggested Blu-Ray today, but a couple of years ago, you might have just as eaily suggested HD-DVD... and where would you be now?

    7. Re:16 years by Ma8thew · · Score: 1

      I hate to nitpick a small part of your post, but Firewire is still going strong on the Mac side. Audio interfaces, video cameras, and most importantly hard drives can all be connected by Firewire, and it is a lot faster than USB.

    8. Re:16 years by karnal · · Score: 1

      In a generic sense - serial is not dead. Of course, the new Dell E series laptops do not have a serial port - so I bought a usb to serial port adapter. Why? Telecommunications. Anything that is a phone switch or piece of networking equipment (enterprise worthy) has a serial port on the device.

      Serial ain't dead yet.

      --
      Karnal
    9. Re:16 years by ari_j · · Score: 1

      So put some old hardware in the time capsule, too. If you want to be able to retrieve the data, set it up with 100Mbps ethernet, DHCP for IPv4 and IPv6, and a web server. Some technologies are more likely to remain backwards-compatible than others (ethernet standards, IP, and DHCP), and other technologies are nearly too simple to evolve in a truly incompatible direction (HTTP).

      I'd be more concerned about file formats than about getting the data onto 2025-era hardware. Use UTF-8 text or HTML4 and you should be fine. Those aren't going to change much and are likely to remain backwards compatible longer than, say, OpenOffice files have a chance of doing.

      But even so, don't give data as a gift. Do you know how disappointing it's going to be when she turns 17 and discovers that nobody loved her enough to put pen to paper?

    10. Re:16 years by ArbitraryDescriptor · · Score: 1

      Why not just include a low cost netbook or laptop in there? Load it with all the media you like; then all your compatibility concerns will boil down to whether the AC wall outlet spec is subject to change in 17 years*

      * It isn't**

      **Well... if it does there will be adapters.

    11. Re:16 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on you people... Sheesh, as technology advances it's lasting longer. We're now into creating standards with large groups of companies all agreeing on how to do things. One of the main reasons old technology was "lost" is because there were a lot of companies doing their own thing with no standards so there just weren't that many people using each specific technology. We're getting better and better about not doing that so our technology will last very long even though there is newer stuff available.

      I'll step into dangerous territory here with a car analogy. Think about this, compare what a 1993 car is like now to a 1977 car in 1993. You see what I mean? A 1993 car doesn't seem that old now because a lot of them are fairly modernized and in great condition. The difference between 1993 and 1977 though, no comparison.

      Trust me, in 16 years it won't be all that different than it is now. I guarantee you will still have CDROM readers just like we still have 5.25 floppy readers that are freaking 30+ years old. I'll go on record right now and say we will still have drives capable of reading CDROM's in 25 years, probably 30+ years even.

    12. Re:16 years by zildgulf · · Score: 1

      I must disagree on that subject. I can still read some CDs burnt 16 years ago. I can't see Dual-layer DVDs and Blu-Ray being so outdated that it cannot be readable 16 years from now. Blu-Ray and DVD, by then, would be considered obsolete but not so backward that is cannot be read.

      Now if you were going to store electronic data for 30 or more years, then it become more problematic since no one has an 8 inch floppy drive or a cassette tape reader.

      This argument that because the massive explosion of computer usage was before 1993 just because the internet wasn't around doesn't hold water. In 1993 there was a heavy demand for computers for office suite applications and the new AOL or Compushare online systems, which meant they had to store their data somehow. Many businesses (large and small) were buying CD burners and I bet that there is a good chance a CD burnt then can be read now.

      Do not confuse obsolete with non-functional. I bet you could find someone that still has a 1.44" floppy drive, even though it is likely that the floppy disk is unreadable itself. Data storage technologies are persistent.

    13. Re:16 years by stefanb · · Score: 1

      - Remember 8250 UART serial ports? Long dead.

      Maybe 8250 chips have been superseded, but 8250 compatible ports continue to be available on many mainboards. And there's always USB adapters. And given how cheap a serial port is to implement, I'm sure we will continue to see it for at least service access to many devices going forward.

      - Remember 2400bps modems? Long dead. How about accoustic couplers?

      Again, V.22bis only modems are not sold anymore, but practically any modem that support V.92 will also support V.22 (and probably Bell 212 and even Bell 103 modes). And accoustic couplers do the same thing, but were motivated mostly by the insistence of Bell that you couldn't hook up your own equipment to the phone line directly. Until high-speed links get a better coverage, people in the boondocks will continue to rely on modems to get online.

      - We had pensioned CGA and EGA - and gone for VGA by 1993. SVGA came soon afterwards.

      But the VGA signal standard (plug, levels, etc.) has continued to work, and even fancy new 24" 1920x1200 monitors will display a 640x480@60Hz signal, just because creaky old BIOSes still start up with this or other equally outdated video modes.

    14. Re:16 years by kthejoker · · Score: 1

      Your point is well taken but overstated. 16 years old doesn't equal "Very old hardware." It's still very easy to find VCRs, LP players, 8 track and cassette players, Zip and floppy drive readers - even proprietary, esoteric standards such as ViewMaster disc-reading toys, player piano roll readers, and BetaMax players are still available.

      I will bet you or anyone else $500 that 16 years from today, we will still have an easily affordable way to read CDs and DVDs from today.

      It will most likely be akin to buying a floppy drive reader now - it won't come standard, but it can be bought in USB form for under $50 retail.

      Even if that doesn't come to fruition, a working PC from the era before optical drives became obsolete (my guess? at least another 5 years) will still be easily available via eBay or a public library or basically any other place where current DVDs will still have interest.

    15. Re:16 years by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Your USB flash drive won't work anymore.

      You know this... how? All in all, I think you are much too optimistic about the rate of change. It's not that fast.

      Anyway, as to the original question: media is so cheap, store it in multiple formats: one USB external drive, one USB stick, and a DVD-R (archival quality). Also, send yourself it clearly labeled to your email (preferably web-based giant like yahoo or googe or microsoft, not a work one where you can be fired or a home-based service that you may change). If it's too big, RAR it.

      Not just for the time capsule, but one good thing about digital media is the explosion in capacity. That means, every five years, you can take your entire previous media collection, and fit it on at most 1/3 of devices (ie turning 3 hard drives into 1). That's also a good point to take the time to back up all the legacy stuff into a new device.

    16. Re:16 years by wallsg · · Score: 1

      Use a PAR2 parity program for the inevitable bad bits that will pop up. Make the block size the same as the media's block size.

  30. Geek pretentiousness by RobinEggs · · Score: 1

    You guys do realize that 3.5 inch floppies have been publicly available for 22 years right? And the USB devices for 13 years? Even if you used a floppy it wouldn't be *that* hard to access in 16 years, and the USB standard isn't exactly on its way out at the moment.

    It always amazes me how pretentious geeks can be, assuming all the technology of today will be some sort of arcane relic mere months or years from now.

    1. Re:Geek pretentiousness by koiransuklaa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you realize that you're a looking at it with 20/20 hindsight? Yes, the 3.5" floppy did all right but loads of other media did not. I've used 8" floppies, 5 1/4" floppies, Iomega zipdrives, several sorts of tape drives, half a dozen different memory card standards... none of those were seen as fringe technologies at the time.

      In other words: No, all technology will not be an arcane relic in 16 years but _many_ technologies will be. The trick is choosing the right one.

    2. Re:Geek pretentiousness by kobotronic · · Score: 1

      Floppies are probably a bad example. NASA has famously had lots of grief trying to find equipment to decipher their archaic floppies from the beginning of the space shuttle project. Today I would be hard pressed to find anyone with a working 5.25" drive capable of reading my old late-80s highschool documents. I doubt the discs are actually physically readable by anoyone. With the dwindling interest fewer and fewer specialty places will support the tech and so it will become ever more expensive to recover data locked in these archaic formats. Flash-based storage media with USB interfaces would, given their ubiquity today probably be readable using common adapter equipment in 2025, but I don't know if the physical medium is immune to degradation over time.

      The technology replacement pace is anything but linear. We're experiencing a very rapid transition from physical media to online storage, and new, ever more abstract frameworks and access concepts. Who can tell what Google Wave 3.0 look like and how we'll be accessing it? The change involved here does not compare to the evolution that led from reel-to-reel decks to cassette tapes. Certainly there will be oldtimers and troglodytes suspiciously hanging on to local physical media in 16 years - distrusting or otherwise rejecting the communal content cloud. Teenagers will have fully embraced it, knowing no alternative and shaping ever more inscrutable further evolution.

    3. Re:Geek pretentiousness by zmollusc · · Score: 1

      Oh great, you had to mention zip drives. Now I am in a bad mood till I forget about them again.

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    4. Re:Geek pretentiousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! Personally, I'm hedging my bets on HD-DVD

    5. Re:Geek pretentiousness by sheph · · Score: 1

      Reading floppies that are 16 years old can be a hit or miss prospect. Heck reading a floppy that was made 2 days ago can be dicy (not an incredibly stable means of storage). I think USB or CD-R has much more likelihood of being readable in 16 years from now. Put both in there with a netbook sans battery, and you shouldn't have any problems.

      --
      I don't believe in karma, I just call it like I see it.
    6. Re:Geek pretentiousness by WillDraven · · Score: 1

      Yeah they weren't "fringe" but they sure as hell broke all the time.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    7. Re:Geek pretentiousness by kthejoker · · Score: 1

      The better question is: just because something is an arcane relic, does that mean there will be no way to read it? He's not asking to have it published in the most popular standard, he just wants something that can be read in 17 years. You can still get a reader for every format you listed there via eBay or Craigslist or a flea market.

      That may be half the fun of getting something in a time capsule like this. "Hmm, a USB 2.0 drive? How do I download this to my neural cyberdeck?"

    8. Re:Geek pretentiousness by spinkham · · Score: 1

      I recently pulled out my zip drive and transfered all my old stuff to DVDs.

      Really weren't so bad, if you got the SCSI ZIP drive and kept the disks in cases. I never had much problems anyway.

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
    9. Re:Geek pretentiousness by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      Zip drives doesn't deserve that much scorn. Jaz drives, on the other hand...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    10. Re:Geek pretentiousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh I've got a bunch of 16+ year old floppies with text files on them that I should convert to something one of these days. There are still plenty of machines around with floppy drives. There was a time you couldn't buy a computer without one. What should I convert it to? CD seems like the best choice, it's hard to buy a full size computer or laptop (pre-assembled) without a cd drive these days. Text files from back in the day are still easily read, as long as it doesn't have a bunch of marking up. jpegs, bmps, and gifs are fairly old and very common, so chances are someone will have some software to open it. 16 years really isn't that long, I have a couple working computers that are older than that.

    11. Re:Geek pretentiousness by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Today I would be hard pressed to find anyone with a working 5.25" drive capable of reading my old late-80s highschool documents.

      I have 3 working 5.25" floppy drives (2x 1.2MB and 1x 360KB). If you used a PC to store your data, my PC would be able to read it. I have floppies from 1990 and can read them (the files were modified in 1990). I also have MS-DOS 5 on 5.25" floppies and the floppies can be read without a single error.

    12. Re:Geek pretentiousness by RobinEggs · · Score: 1

      Your response would make sense, I suppose, save that I specifically did not mention any less than ubiquitous technologies. I didn't say just use an SD card or just slap it into an LS-120. I mentioned things that have already passed their test of time.

      Hindsight is involved, but that doesn't mean it's self-righteous or presumptuous.

    13. Re:Geek pretentiousness by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Iomega zipdrives, several sorts of tape drives, half a dozen different memory card standards... none of those were seen as fringe technologies at the time.
      Theese may not have been fringe but they were never anywhere near as widely distributed as the 3.5 inch floppy was.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    14. Re:Geek pretentiousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, the 5 1/4" floppies were THE standard for over a decade. 3.5" floppies didn't take over until the 90's!

  31. There is no such thing by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Recently it was mentioned on a documentary I've seen: 10,000 years of evolution, and the best thing to conserve information we came up with was stone tablets.

    It's unfortunately true. The more sophisticated our means of storage are, the more brittle and frail they are. Essentially, you would have to bury not only the medium but also the means to play them back. The tricky part is finding out "where to stop".

    "Thanks for the 8track" was a quite good tagline for this problem. 20 years ago, an 8track would have been the thing to store information on. Today, you would have a hard time finding a player. And the problem gets worse with every year. Magnetic tapes, VHS or Beta, dominated the video market for over two decades. DVD didn't dominate for one. BluRay is probably going to be replaced before long. The time between generations of players is shrinking quickly. Soon we'll see, if you're not an early adopter, you're already lagging a generation behind.

    The most sensible way, and a worthy geek project too, would be to create a playback device made entirly from standard off the shelf parts that you may sensibly assume to be still available in a few decades, put the packing list along with the content you want to preserve into the box and make sure you also store your content in a way that survives the test of time.

    You only have to bridge about two decades. It would be a very interesting project to try something like that with the goal to make information last millenia.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:There is no such thing by tagno25 · · Score: 1

      The most sensible way, and a worthy geek project too, would be to create a playback device made entirly from standard off the shelf parts that you may sensibly assume to be still available in a few decades, put the packing list along with the content you want to preserve into the box and make sure you also store your content in a way that survives the test of time.

      Include instructions, in paper, on how to build an open source hardware playback device with parts, that have been around a wile, you can buy from digikey (or similar shops).

    2. Re:There is no such thing by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      10,000 years of evolution, and the best thing to conserve information we came up with was stone tablets.

      It's unfortunately true.

      It is really, really not true. Have you ever stopped to consider

      1. survival rate -- i.e. how many clay/stone tablets have not survived four millennia; and
      2. how many clay tablets would have survived if kept under normal operating conditions -- i.e. not being fired when an invading army set fire to your city?

      Now stone, I grant you, gets past the second of these conditions better than clay. However, it fails the first condition even more spectacularly than clay does, since stone tends to get destructively recycled as a building material.

    3. Re:There is no such thing by agnosticnixie · · Score: 1

      If stone, clay and paper survived so well, we wouldn't be wailing about lacking data that much in classics.

    4. Re:There is no such thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, carve the message on a gravestone.

    5. Re:There is no such thing by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Perfect. Problem solved, let's go on to the next topic.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:There is no such thing by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, it guess it's hard to figure out how many artefacts did not survive if they're not referenced anywhere. We know of a few plays of greek writers that didn't make it, mostly because someone mentions them in a letter or compares something to them (so we might at least know what the play was about). But it's already quite impressive to see what did survive for millenia. Of course, one may safely assume that a lot, if not 99%, of what was ever written is now dust or has been recycled. But isn't it interesting that we have more written documents from 3000 years removed Egypt than from medieval Europe of 1500 years ago?

      I wonder what will remain from us. And how much of it will be readable. I'm fairly confident that we currently produce more content per year, if not month or even day, than has been produced in total until 1500. Or at least, more than we know of. I wonder how much of it will still be there a millenium from now.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:There is no such thing by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      It would be a very interesting project to try something like that with the goal to make information last millenia.

      I recently saw an original copy of the Magna Carta at the British Library. That's now almost a thousand years old. I believe that it's written on vellum. The Bayeux Tapestry is even older, so tapestry seems to be a good medium to last a millennium...

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    8. Re:There is no such thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last 8 track was made in 1988, and they had been rare since the early 70s. A big reason for their quick decline was their extreme lack of durability. However, never underestimate people's pack-rat nature, because it's actually really easy to find working 8 track players in thrift stores and ebay.

      For audio data, I think a pretty safe bet is the good old fashioned record. They aren't too expensive to get pressed, and the chances are extremely high that turntables will be available in 16 years. The sheer amount of LP geekery involved in two separate domains (i.e. DJs and audiophiles) is a pretty good safeguard against the technology becoming obsolete.

      For text data, as others have mentioned print it out. Easy.

      Video data is a little more complicated. The problem isn't so much storage as it is video connectors. If pressed, I would have to suggest including a mini-dvd player with built-in screen and a DVD.

      However, I think part of the fun of the whole time capsule idea is to show a picture of the period in which it was made. The fact is, the way a lot of people enjoy media now is with portable media players. Including a portable media player stuffed to the brim with video, text and music is a great idea.

    9. Re:There is no such thing by giorgist · · Score: 1

      OK, scratch a message on a funky box with some antennas sticking out of it.
      call it Voyager and launch it. 5 billion years from now your stone tablets will be no more,
      That will still be around

      I win ...

    10. Re:There is no such thing by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

      You do realize there is a company in the DFW area that released the latest Cheap Trick album on 8-track, right?

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    11. Re:There is no such thing by morgauxo · · Score: 1

      Looks pretty easy to play back an 8-track to me! http://shop.ebay.com/?_from=R40&_trksid=m38&_nkw=8-track&_sacat=See-All-Categories Is data really what the parents had in mind though? What are you thinking of putting in there? I liked the idea one of the early posts had about pieces from the wallpaper of the baby room and stuff like that.

    12. Re:There is no such thing by DrMaurer · · Score: 1

      You most certainly would not have a hard time finding a player. Any decent size flea market and/or a Friday morning garage sale round has, almost without exception, old media players that people don't use any more. Most of them actually work. VHS, BETA, Laserdisc, even old records that had video data (seriously), and so on. A motivated person could find anything, even an old cylinder-type phonograph.

      --
      Dan
    13. Re:There is no such thing by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      If we wanted to we could do much, much better than stone tablets; it's just not the direction that our technology has taken us. If nothing else, I would think etched steel would last longer than stone and have a higher information density. I would argue that this has even already been done, there's a certain Gold record zipping out of the solar system that should last well over a million years. And even if the data is destroyed, it is designed tell an intelligent being things in other ways.

    14. Re:There is no such thing by brusk · · Score: 1

      Very true. In China there's a huge corpus of stone inscriptions--most of which have survived not on stone, but as transcriptions in books. The stones wear away but the texts are recopied and preserved.

      --
      .sig withheld by request
    15. Re:There is no such thing by ion.simon.c · · Score: 1

      *boggles* How much video data could one fit on a record? And at what fidelity? *continues boggling*

    16. Re:There is no such thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trouble with stone tablets is that they have limited storage space. Try putting a video on a stone tablet! The tradeoff isn't modernity vs. durability, it's storage capacity vs. durability. If you want to encode a few lines of text or an image, then stone monuments are the way to go, and have been used even in modern times (Mount Rushmore, the Georgia Guidestones). However, if you want to record voice, video, or some sort of Apocalyptic Log like in the movies, you'll need to pack your data in tighter, and that means using technological tricks that don't stand up to time as well.

    17. Re:There is no such thing by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure stone tablets are really the superior medium. Without knowing how many stone tablets were actually ever created compared to how many still exist it's hard to run the numbers.

      Stone survives fire and water fairly well, but is vulnerable to vibration and shock compared to paper.

      Meanwhile, one well-heeled corporation church has their own suggestions on making data last forever.

      --
      Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
    18. Re:There is no such thing by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 1

      Why not include a schematic for building an mp4 player from an open source microcontroller project like an Arduino? Design it so that it can read printed sheets of data to build it's video / audio files. Print all of your data onto plastic sheets. Place all of the electronic components necessary to build the unit into the box. Don't build it, just put in all of the parts, because if a part is bad, she'll have to replace it before building the player. Then, if you can get her interested in electronics at a young age, when the time comes, she'll open up the time capsule and say "Thanks Dad! I needed a fun electronics problem." If she's not into electronics... you're a geek. You'll want to build it for nostalgia sake, and she will love you for the labor of love.

      The principles of electronics will not change. Put as many non-corruptable parts as possible into the box (should be most of them, if not all of them), and make sure that there is enough detail to build the reader from the parts and program the reader using only the parts.

      Not saying that this would be easy, but it would be a cool project for father and daughter to work on together right at a point in her life where she's starting to get over the rebellious stage of life.

      Oh, and if you're going to all the trouble to include audio and video... do her a favor and actually hand write something from everyone. As someone else said, the tactile element of handling an object that has been buried for 16 years is of greater value than the digital data.


      Man... now I've got a project I want to make happen before my first child is born!

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
    19. Re:There is no such thing by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      You only have to bridge about two decades

      In which case, some optical format (CD, DVD, BluRay, etc) is probably fine, so long as a disc is chosen that is rated to last that amount of time (and they do exist, for far more than 20 years).

      The form factor for optical disc has pretty much been "perfected". We've now got three generations of optical technologies all using the same form factor, and they're all backwards compatible back to the original.

      Any time a new optical format is introduced, it's imperative to support the previous optical formats for adoption purposes. So if you burn your stuff onto a CD or DVD, it's highly likely that you'll be able to read it in 16 years with the optical drive of the day. At the very worst, it shouldn't be hard to find a computer in 16 years that can read a CD or DVD. After all, it's trivially easy today to find a 20 year old computer. Some people even still use them.

      In short, 16 years is easy. 50 might be more of a challenge.

    20. Re:There is no such thing by ZosX · · Score: 1

      I would say probably not a lot. 12 megabytes maybe. The problem is the analog to digital conversion. Over a voice line modems seem pretty locked at 56 kilobits/sec. Of course you'd have a much thicker frequency spectrum with vinyl, so you could probably pack more in there, but not a great deal more. Also, just think about the rotational latency at 45 RPM and the fact that your data would have to be in one continuous linear stream as random seeks would be pretty out of the question. Then you would have to flip the disk halfway through. Not the best medium, I'm afraid.

    21. Re:There is no such thing by curunir · · Score: 1

      Recently it was mentioned on a documentary I've seen: 10,000 years of evolution, and the best thing to conserve information we came up with was stone tablets.

      It's unfortunately true.

      Wouldn't laser etching on a hardened-carbon (aka diamond) surface fare better than a stone tablet? As a bonus, you get to write a lot smaller than you could on a stone tablet, so you can pack a lot more information per tablet.

      Perhaps it's true that the concept of a stone tablet is the best way to store information, but I'd bet there's a modern, high-tech way of implementing that concept that's far better than what the ancient world was able to produce.

      It would be a very interesting project to try something like that with the goal to make information last millenia.

      You mean something like this? Their main goal is to make a clock that will last 10,000 years, but it looks like they're working on library-ish projects too.

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    22. Re:There is no such thing by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      My VCR plays 20 year old tapes almost like new, so in my opinion VHS can be used to store video for long periods of time (and I'm using it to do that). There is a huge number of VCRs (if they are no longer being made), so it will be possible to buy one on ebay if the one you bought for recording the tape breaks from use or non-use.

      Audio cassettes and R2R audio tapes can store their content for a very very long time and decks are available on ebay. Cassette players are probably still being made.

      Now with computer data is is a bit more difficult, but can still be done.
      Floppies last a very long time and the drives will be available, but the capacity of a floppy is so small by current standards that you may not be able to put everything you want in a reasonable quantity of floppy disks.

      CD drives will be available for a very long time, but CD-Rs do not last long. The same with DVD-Rs.

      Tape can last a long time and you can still find old tape drives on ebay. Also, tape drives are usually backward compatible at least with a few of the prior generations (my LTO-1 tapes can be read on LTO-2 and LTO-3 drives).

      However, my personal choice is Magneto-Optical disks. The disks last at least 50 years and are resistant to magnetic fields. The drives will be available on ebay.

      Just go to ebay and look at the items people sell. You can buy a device that is 40 years old or older. What makes you think that you won't be able to buy a device that is 16 or 20 years old. Just use the medium that can hold onto its data for that long and of course do not throw away the device you used to record it with. But even if your device does not make it to 2025 you will be able to buy another one.

    23. Re:There is no such thing by Wierdy1024 · · Score: 1

      What about data barcodes or something. You don't get much data density, but at least it's digital.

      You can be fairly certain it'll be readable, because all you need is a scanner or camera, and even if technology changes a lot, I can't imagine both of those disappearing too fast with nothing to replace them.

      The challenge is decoding the data - formats and specifications come and go, but for someone determined enough, it's always possible to write some software to emulate an older system. Take jpeg for example - from the bare written specifications of jpeg, I think anyone reasonably competent at logic could re-implement from scratch all the code required to decode it and show it on a screen within a few weeks. (I even wrote a basic jpeg decoder myself, but it didn't output direct to a screen, and required an operating system to run under it for library functions like memory allocation and file access, so not entirely "from scratch")

    24. Re:There is no such thing by DrMaurer · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I should have done the linkage in my original post. The Capacitance Electronic Discs is what I'm talking about there.

      Watched Soylent Green on one of these. The classic vinyl "skip" produced some pretty entertaining results.

      --
      Dan
    25. Re:There is no such thing by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Actually we have more written records from roman/greek times than from medieval times. Mostly because the use of stone and clay as writing material fell in disuse and it was common in early medieval times to burn down houses during a raid. Paper burns really well.

      Paper of that time, properly stored, most likely would survive far longer than our modern paper because we use a lot of chemicals that are not really beneficial for long term storage. Also, a lot of the writings of later periods don't suffer from bad paper but from acid in the inks used. The writing literally eats away the paper it's written on.

      Stone will easily break and crack, but you can still reassemble the pieces and read what was written, at least in some cases. Paper and the information stored on it is lost for good when it is burned.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    26. Re:There is no such thing by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Some records will stand the test of time. Our national archives contain a lot of writings that survived a millenium or even longer. But this is mostly due to "good" materials. Such important documents also were written on materials that were known to stand the test of time.

      Too bad we don't consider information so important anymore. Few people take precautions to make sure their contracts and records can be read and enforced a century after their death.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    27. Re:There is no such thing by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Also how to recover the data stored on it?

      You here face the maybe most difficult challenge in the quest to transfer information: You have to tell a being that won't know anything about human language (or maybe language in general, you must not make any assumptions, actually) how to create a mechanic device.

      If you assume only that the being is intelligent and willing to learn how to build it, how do you transport the information? With pictures? How? You can't even use arrows to indicate direction because that's already a symbol you can't expect to be understood.

      In other words, whoever finds this record would first of all find out how to use it. Which in turn provokes an interesting thought argument: Imagine you're that alien life form and this human artefact lands on your lap. First, what would you assume it is? Second, how would you try to unlock its secrets?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    28. Re:There is no such thing by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, of course we won't know the total number of stone tablets ever chiseled. I'm actually certain that most, if not almost everything, of what has ever been written is lost. Still, the only surviving "ancient paper" we have is from Egypt (correct me if I'm wrong), and we know that clay tablets are at least able to survive 4000+ years.

      And considering the storage attempt: If they can lock away some of Elrons books, why can't they lock them all away?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    29. Re:There is no such thing by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And then squint reeeeeeeally hard and try to read it?

      When we're leaving the "have to bridge 20 years" problem and thus deal with "eternal" storage (I hope you're not suggesting going through that harship for the rather trivial time of two decades), we also have to take into account that whoever should read our information might not have access to the technology we have anymore. Yes, technology loss happens. Happened all the time in history. If you look at Europe around 500 BC and at it around 500 AD you'll notice that technology was (at least in southern Europe) probably more advanced in 500BC. A lot was lost after the collapse of the Roman Empire. Hell, it took a few millenia to reinvent asphalt after the Sumerians' secret how to do it was lost and forgotten.

      An "eternal" storage also needs to take into account the possibility that the information has to be retrievable without sophisticated technology. Also, you have to make sure that someone stumbling upon it doesn't dismiss it as some sort of "curiosity" or "impurity" in the stone instead of information. You can't simply assume that people will see your info gem as an information storage device. They might yell "pretty!" and make it into an ornament, not realizing its real meaning.

      It's a common in-joke in archeologic cycles to call everything a "ritual" or "cultic" device if its function can't be decypered. I guess you don't want your important information be seen as something we primitive savages once worshipped.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  32. mass media by johncandale · · Score: 1

    text, video, music files.

    Use the most popular media formant. I.E. DVD's. And not data DVD's, standard encoded DVD's that can be played on any walmart DVD set top box. The sheer millions of them around will assure something will be around or able to to be bought used super cheap to watch the Video and Music files. The trick is you'll have to order a pressed DVD, not a burned one, to make sure it will last that long. You can easily store Text on their too. Granted it would be in image formant, hard to transfer, but for a birthday gift it's fine.

    1. Re:mass media by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      If DVDs are anything like CD-R they will have hard time surviving just 5 years, let alone 16. So stay away from writable optical media. Getting a DVD professional pressed might make it survivable (like a bought movie).

  33. Think back 17 years by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Think back to 1992, what did we use?

    And what are we still using today?

    CD !!

    I still have music CDs that I purchased in the 1970's that are still usable :)

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Think back 17 years by slim · · Score: 3, Informative

      I still have music CDs that I purchased in the 1970's that are still usable :)

      1982 at the earliest.

      But there is a difference between a pressed CD - which can last for a very long time - and a CDR which decays surprisingly quickly.

    2. Re:Think back 17 years by JJJK · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately there is a difference between CD-R's and pressed CD's. The best Idea would probably be to keep the data redundant on multiple CD-R's (from different manufacturers) and other media like USB sticks (as some already mentioned). If you can, check for integrity every 5 years or so even if that kind of destroys that "time capsule" -idea.

    3. Re:Think back 17 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Considering that audio CDs have only been commercially available since October 1982, I find your claim hard to believe.

    4. Re:Think back 17 years by gutnor · · Score: 1

      So he could have used CD 17 years ago.
      Will CD ( for data storage ) really be readable in 17 years ?

      I tend to agree with other poster - the mainstream equivalent of the CD in 92 is probably the USB drive.
      Mainstream enough yet not old enough to survive a few more years.

      Also there is a big difference between commercial CD and burned ones.
      I did the exercise a few years back and I already had to try a few computer before being able to read the backup made circa 2000.

    5. Re:Think back 17 years by moonbender · · Score: 1

      That's impressive considering the first CDs were only available in 1982 or 1983. Must've been a pre-order...

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    6. Re:Think back 17 years by bamf · · Score: 4, Informative

      I still have music CDs that I purchased in the 1970's that are still usable :)

      A pretty good trick since they weren't commercially available until late '82 :)

    7. Re:Think back 17 years by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Encrypt it with something which will still be well-known in 16 years - AES-128, for example - and put the key in the time capsule (pencil on paper then laminate; or stamp into metal) along with some copies of media. Keep some encrypted copies out of the capsule and use them for regular integrity checks and duplication.

    8. Re:Think back 17 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy a netbook with a solid state drive and put all the data on it (with all the appropriate viewing software installed of course). I would think even after 16-17 years you should still be able to plug it in and boot it up.

    9. Re:Think back 17 years by kimvette · · Score: 1

      I have a handful of CDs I burned back in 1995 that still work. I had a LOT of old backup and software CDs from the same time that I tried early this year and they still worked fine. I threw most of them out since most of the backups and all of the software were completely obsolete. It was cheap media (for the time), as well. CD-R holds up very well. The major enemy is handling the CDs roughly; since the data is typically actually stored on the label side (that is, on the shiny side, under the label), not in the center of the medium like DVDs, the slightest scratch, nick, or bubble in the foil under the label will result in loss of data.

      Check the discs that have failed from so-called "bit rot" by holding them up to light - chances are the foil has been damaged. If that's the case blame your storage and handling methods; not the technology.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  34. Re:With the cut price components used these days.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The main netbook electronics will be perfectly fine in only 16 years time. I have a 386 system from 1987 or so that still works (yes, the hard drive in it still works too). Just include a bootable live disc with OS and files. Optical discs, even burned ones, can easily last a century if stored properly.

  35. Mylar tape by jcr · · Score: 1

    The data density is pretty low, but it's awfully durable.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Mylar tape by Technician · · Score: 1

      For those who don't remember this technology, mylar tape is punched tape like ticker tape. Ticker tape is the paper version. If the machinery is no longer around to read it, it can be read by hand. Most Mylar tape has 9 rows of holes. The small holes near the center are the clock. The other 8 bits were ASCII. If memory serves me, there were 3 bits, clock, then 5 bits. The clock was off center so the tape could not be threaded in upside down or tail first from a tape that was not rewound.

      A quick google search turned up a confirmation. The clock row was called the S row for Sprocket.

      When characters were written there was great care in selecting the placement of bits to insure accuracy of numeric computations. Character skewing was less a problem the nearer the Read/Write Head was to the timing sprocket pulse. The sprocket pulse (position S) was in the center or near center as there were 8 bits in total with the sprocket pulse. The check pulse to insure the bit count was odd (position 1) and the 4 lower bits (positions 4,5,6,7), which included the vital numeric characters, were crowded next to the sprocket pulse. The remaining 2 bits (positions 2,3) were for the alphabetic and special characters and were located on the outer edges of the tape. The bit numbering positions on tape were 3,5,1,S,6,7,4,2.

      http://univac1.0catch.com/index.htm

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    2. Re:Mylar tape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to use something you're going to need a specialist to decode, why not go with optar?.

    3. Re:Mylar tape by jcr · · Score: 1

      Ticker tape is the paper version.

      No. Ticker tape is a strip of paper that gets stock quotes printed on it. No holes.

      The clock row was called the S row for Sprocket.

      Actually, they are sprocket holes. The mechanical readers use those holes to drive the tape through the reader. It was much later, when optical reading became common, that people took advantage of the sprocket holes being smaller than the data holes to use them to strobe the reader.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  36. The media question is easy... by bistromath007 · · Score: 2, Funny

    USB is like... the best standard ever. Just have everyone throw everything on a flash stick. In 16 years, if there is not just yet another faster version of it that is backward compatible with all the old ones, then you can personally come over here and slap me with a rolled up newspaper.

    The files are a little tougher, but it's hard to imagine .jpg, .mpg, and .mp3 ever not being supported. Those are standards which are also more likely to be updated than ditched, I think.

    1. Re:The media question is easy... by bistromath007 · · Score: 1

      Wish I'd thought of this while writing the first post, but another benefit of using a flash stick is that, if you're only writing stuff to it once and then sticking it in a box, it'll be more durable than an optical disc of any kind. Discs can melt, warp, get scratches, crack, and some writeables seem to have crappy, degradable media.

    2. Re:The media question is easy... by bistromath007 · · Score: 1

      It feels weird to keep replying to myself, but a techie friend of mine has pointed out that flash memory does degrade over time even when not in use, although the rate is slow enough that any corruption should be manageable if you still choose that. If you don't want to take the risk, we determined that a USB hard drive would be the best alternative. As with the flash, the plug itself is definitely going to be able to get stuck in something, and if for whatever weird reason the drive itself won't play with future hardware, then it won't be that hard to find a retro machine that will still talk to it. If all else fails, the poor girl can just pay to have the data recovered professionally. Expensive, but those platters aren't just going to rot away, so everything will be on there.

    3. Re:The media question is easy... by chrb · · Score: 1

      Hmm, flash memory degrades over time but a hard drive wouldn't?! How do you think data is encoded on the platters of the hard drive?

      All of this has been asked before, and will be asked again.

    4. Re:The media question is easy... by bistromath007 · · Score: 1

      Bit rot on a hard drive takes ten times as long. It's going to last seventeen years.

    5. Re:The media question is easy... by Megane · · Score: 1

      ...if the motor still spins up.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    6. Re:The media question is easy... by bistromath007 · · Score: 1

      If it doesn't, the data can still be recovered. I already said that. :|

    7. Re:The media question is easy... by Shrike82 · · Score: 1

      I'm not entirely sure that's true in the timescales we're talking about. I cannot find a single solid piece of evidence that categorically states "data on a solid-state non-volatile USB flash drive will only last XX years". People throw the 10 years figure around a lot, vaguely mentioning that manufacturers only guarantee the data will still be readable for this amount of time, but I think that's just for their own protection if someone tries to sue their great-grandchild when their data isn't readable in the distant future.

      --
      You can advertise in this sig from as little as £99.99 a month!
    8. Re:The media question is easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy a pair of cheap NAS servers, replicate the content. You may add 2 extra HD with copies of the data, just in case...
      Ethernet will still be there in 16 years. Use PNG for images, rtf or HTML for the text, mpeg4 for videos, and off you go.

    9. Re:The media question is easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This whole post is just really misinformed...

    10. Re:The media question is easy... by andre_pl · · Score: 1

      How would you intend to find a solid piece of evidence stating that? Enough time hasn't passed to say for sure, but intelligent people can make estimates, and you'd be much better off trusting their answers and not taking the risk in the first place.

      In other words, you'd have to be a complete moron to expect a Thumbdrive to hold your data for 17 years. There may not be evidence that the data WILL degrade/disappear, but there also is no evidence that your data will be in tact either. so why would you choose to err on the side of stupidity?

    11. Re:The media question is easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not funny, I'm seriously not sure why it's ranked funny. That is actually a reasonable suggestion. CDs? DVDs? Besides scratching, some formulations have been shown to even grow fungus over times, like a literal bit rot. Just put in USB memory sticks. And it's also true, jpegs, pngs, H264, mpeg, mp3, those are the kinds of formats to use.

                One thing to NOT do -- seriously, the suggestions to pay for 20 years of hosting? Don't pay for 20 years of hosting or whatever. Companies fold, and they aren't going to stay in business just because 1 customer paid ahead.

    12. Re:The media question is easy... by Shrike82 · · Score: 1
      A good point, and I agree that without any evidence you probably shouldn't trust archive data to a flash drive.

      However, I'm really intrigued now by this particular problem. Nowhere at all can I find even a theoretical discussion or description of data decay in solid state memory like flash drives. They're supposed to be non-volatile, and while I understand that it's by no means perfect and that charge can dissipate over time, I really want to know how much charge is lost over what amount of time. If anyone has sources then please post them.

      --
      You can advertise in this sig from as little as £99.99 a month!
    13. Re:The media question is easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone planing to win this bet should stash a "newspaper" somewhere, just in case.

  37. gold! by bronney · · Score: 1

    just carve stuff on a piece of gold and use the cravings for cheesecake! Your niece will thank you for it trust me!

  38. CD-R by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CD-R

    Unreliable as they are, a good expensive CD-R is probably your safest bet.
    Kept in a cold, dark place they are supposed to last more then a hundred years (well, this is marketing, but hopefully they'll last 20).
    I think it's fair to hope that the optical disk drives of the future will keep reading CD-R

    Solid state disks have a data retention of 10 years, so they are a no-go.
    Traditional HD are no better, and I wouldn't trust them to start spinning after 16 years still.
    I think DVD-R are not even as good.

    Then, of course, you'll better back-up everything on the internet in case things go wrong...

  39. Re:With the cut price components used these days.. by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    My impression is that build quality on 1987 386s was better than on current equipment. In particular, grandparent's comment about electrolytic capacitors points to major quality issues they've been having recently.

  40. Divorce? by jginspace · · Score: 2, Funny

    "what's the best way to save the data to ensure she'll actually be able to see it in 16 years? "

    You're missing the real point of his question. I think he's really asking how to make his Time Capsule zombie/meteor/nuclear bomb-proof.

    And divorce-proof.

    "Oh darling, when you were just twelve months old your mother and ... Damnit! If it wasn't for you I'd have never had to get married to that ... $%^#&#@%$".

    1. Re:Divorce? by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is what happens when you marry for superficial reasons like, "She has a big rack" or "He buys me things." People ignore the practical stuff like - Can you sit in a room for hours, just watching boring TV, and tolerate one another's annoying quirks? If you can then you can build a marriage that will last forever (or at least 'til death).

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    2. Re:Divorce? by st1d · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Tossing out the TV would save a lot of marriages. Folks don't talk anymore, they drool into the tube for hours on end. Plus, people see things on TV, decide they need that in their life, and throw away perfectly good relationships because of some cheesy screenwriting. Of course, it doesn't help marrying someone for superficial reasons...like Ron White says, you can buy a bigger rack, but you can't fix stupid. :)
      ~
      As for the topic, I'd go with archival CD/DVDs (read-only) for the things you can't print, they're popular enough now that even if the disk warps or is otherwise obsolete, there should be someone around who will still have the ability to extract information from them. Might want to toss in a pack of baseball cards or something else that will accumulate in value during that time, just to pay for it, though. lol

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
    3. Re:Divorce? by mh1997 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Can you sit in a room for hours, just watching boring TV, and tolerate one another's annoying quirks? you can then you can build a marriage that will last forever (or at least 'til death).

      Or even better, do you have the ability to do things without each other. Staying in a room together without annoying each other for hours is fine, but marriage is being stuck in a room together for years. Sometimes you have to leave the room, be your own person, and then come back to the room.

    4. Re:Divorce? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Toss the TV and the internet. Best friend of mine is having marriage trouble. she is on Facebook 8 hours a day.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:Divorce? by PunditGuy · · Score: 1

      Getting relationship advice from /. is a little like getting dieting advice from Aintitcoolnews.

    6. Re:Divorce? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      If you can then you can build a marriage that will last forever (or at least 'til death).

      For all practical purposes, that is forever. But yes, what makes a marriage last (mine didn't) isn't about the things a couple love about each other, it's about the things they can't tolerate about each other.

    7. Re:Divorce? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>like Ron White says, you can buy a bigger rack...

      I hate big racks. My niece told me she bought breast implants and the first thing out of my mouth was "Why???" She was really cute before but now she looks un-natural, especially since the implants have traveled south to her stomach. (shaking head). Way to ruin your appearance girl. I'm like King Henry the 8th, I prefer small firm breasts. Stay away from the fakies.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    8. Re:Divorce? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      That sounds like my parents, who were fine while they were apart with separate interests (dad at work; mom at home), but once they both retired they discovered they hate each other. I wouldn't be surprised to get a phonecall and hear that they killed each other - yes it's that bad.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    9. Re:Divorce? by WillKemp · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I agree. Silicon tits are disgusting. I can't see the attraction at all. Anyway, more than a handful is a waste!

    10. Re:Divorce? by WillKemp · · Score: 1

      Can you sit in a room for hours, just watching boring TV, and tolerate one another's annoying quirks? If you can then you can build a marriage that will last forever (or at least 'til death).

      If sit in a room for hours watching boring TV, it will feel like it's lasted for ever, even if it doesn't!

    11. Re:Divorce? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Tossing out the TV would save a lot of marriages.

      I think it would end a lot of marriages, but I'll agree that banishing the TV from the bedroom might strengthen some marriages.

      Folks don't talk anymore, they drool into the tube for hours on end. Plus, people see things on TV, decide they need that in their life, and throw away perfectly good relationships because of some cheesy screenwriting

      [citation needed]

      Of course, it doesn't help marrying someone for superficial reasons

      That's true. Everybody gets old and ugly, unless they're lucky enough to die first. The outside beauty doesn't matter at all, what matters is the beauty inside.

    12. Re:Divorce? by Poobar · · Score: 1

      Don't toss the TV and don't toss the internet, unless you're willing to toss booze, drugs and gambling too. She doesn't have marriage troubles, she has addiction troubles!

      People who sit in front of the TV or internet for hours don't need the TV or internet *taken away*, they just need willpower or help to fix the underlying problems.

    13. Re:Divorce? by arb+phd+slp · · Score: 1

      Tossing out the TV would save a lot of marriages. Folks don't talk anymore,

      That's a feature, not a bug.

      --
      There's a perfect xkcd for my sig but I'm too lazy to look it up. sudo someone go find it.
    14. Re:Divorce? by andy.ruddock · · Score: 1

      The older I get, the fewer ugly women there seem to be.

      --
      God: An invisible friend for grown-ups.
    15. Re:Divorce? by GungaDan · · Score: 1

      "The older I get, the fewer ugly women there seem to be."

      Yes, vision tends to deteriorate with age.

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    16. Re:Divorce? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Word

    17. Re:Divorce? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I've noticed the same thing. But at age 20, a 40 year old woman is an elderly hag, while to a fifty year old man she's a young hottie.

      Women my age are mostly pretty damned unattractive to me, but I don't feel as old as I am, which may color my perception somewhat.

    18. Re:Divorce? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Maybe she's on fb b/c the marriage is in trouble, not the other way around.

    19. Re:Divorce? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I can't sit for hours in a room watching any kind of tv, with anyone. 'S why wife has her own TV room downstairs and my projects and so forth are either upstairs in the spare bedroom or in the garage. I need to escape the constant roar of the tv or tear my hair out, and having it confined to a corner of the house gives me a chance to seek peace in the other corner.

      Wife and I were both old-school tv-as-babysitter, eat-on-tv-trays, no-life-but-tv kids. I broke out of that as an adult, and like a reformed smoker, I can't stand being around it. She grew up to be a 600 channel barcalounger pilot. Fortunately, daughter seems to be taking after me.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    20. Re:Divorce? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I can put up with a lot of annoyances for a big enough rack~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    21. Re:Divorce? by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      My inlaws spent the last 20 years of their lives in separate rooms watching separate tv's, meeting only at meals and bed. Yeah, their "marriage" lasted.

      The funny thing is, my wife always blamed her Dad. "Why won't he get up and go into the living room?" she'd ask. Then at one point I said "Well, why doesn't your Mom get up and go into the den?"

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    22. Re:Divorce? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      I agree. Silicon tits are disgusting. I can't see the attraction at all. Anyway, more than a handful is a waste!

      They're also very poky and clanky. Silicone implants, however, aren't bad. Anyway: if you can tell they're artificial it's been poorly done, at one level or another.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    23. Re:Divorce? by WillKemp · · Score: 1

      Silicone

      I guess that's the difference between US English and UK/Australian English. We spell it "silicon".

    24. Re:Divorce? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      Are you sure about that? Over here, the metallic element is silicon, and the polymerized siloxanes, combinations of silicon, carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen, are called silicone, from breast implants through industrial vacuum pump oil to tub and window caulking.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    25. Re:Divorce? by operagost · · Score: 1

      We spell it "silicon".

      How do you tell the stuff that's used in integrated circuits (element 14 on the periodic table) apart from fake boobies, then?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    26. Re:Divorce? by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      You could've gone simpler, with:

      Getting relationship advice from /. is a little like getting dieting advice from /.

    27. Re:Divorce? by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Can you sit in a room for hours, just watching boring TV, and tolerate one another's annoying quirks?

      Wow, you are aiming for the top there. Get someoone who you don't hate after 10 minutes, so you can spend the rest of your life watching tv.

    28. Re:Divorce? by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Everybody gets old and ugly, unless they're lucky enough to die first. The outside beauty doesn't matter at all, what matters is the beauty inside.

      While I don't disagree with that statement... I would find it pretty inadequate.

      If people just cared about personality then there wouldn't be a Gay Marriage debate. If it wasn't for the beauty on the outside and the way my brain is wired to appreciate it I would just marry one of my friends who I enjoy hanging out with. I would say that if it wasn't for the shiny candy coating--homosexuality would be the norm. We're biologically engineered to be attracted to potential mates regardless of sexual orientation.

    29. Re:Divorce? by WillKemp · · Score: 1

      It's very hard to really be sure about spelling - as US spelling sort of leaks into everything else - but, i'm fairly sure, yeah.

    30. Re:Divorce? by WillKemp · · Score: 1

      The same way as we distinguish bark (as in dogs) from bark (as in trees).

    31. Re:Divorce? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Oftentimes it's the *weight* that matters more than the age.

      That's why Rebecca Romijn still looks darn hot compared to other 40-something fatties. She even looks hotter than a 20-something college coed, if said coed weighs 150 pounds or more. Overweight bodies are a real turnoff.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    32. Re:Divorce? by robthebloke · · Score: 1

      sorry for going off-topic, but if you were a woman who has recently undergone a mastectomy, you'd see the attraction....

    33. Re:Divorce? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Overweight bodies are a real turnoff.

      That's a cultural phenomena. I used to like skinny girls, now I'm actually turned on by overweight women, so long as they're not tall. Not knowing who she is (I don't follow celebreties), I googled Rebecca Romijn. You think she's fat? WTF? She looks ideal to me, even though she's not short enough.

    34. Re:Divorce? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      If people just cared about personality then there wouldn't be a Gay Marriage debate.

      Yes, there would. Female brains aren't like male brains, no matter what their bodies look like. Although I agree, there's a woman named Robin that I was with a year or so ago who had absolutely no breasts at all. I couldn't get an erection. But then again I dodn't care much for her personality, either.

      OTOH my current SO would NOT be what most would consider a turnon, but I have no trouble with it with her.

      Half my friends are in fact women I enjoy hanging out with.

  41. use paper and describe the algorithm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't need to go as far as http://www.ollydbg.de/Paperbak/.

    But he managed to put 500k of Data onto a single sheet of A4 paper.

    Implementing an algorithm, which decodes such data should still be possible in 16 years (if the supplied USB stick doesn't work any longer).

    Just be sure to document the algorithm on paper as well :)

    good luck

  42. Analogue! by slim · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The most sensible thing would be digital files, with a maintenance schedule -- migrate to a new medium every so often.

    However if the requirement absolutely requires that a physical medium is locked up or buried for 17 years, then I'd go for analogue media with tangible encodings:

    • For text and images, paper and ink (for longer periods, carve stone or etch metal!)
    • For audio, get some vinyl pressed
    • For video, 8mm film

    It may not be easy to play the vinyl or the 8mm film in 17 years -- but it will be possible, and decay is less likely to be catastrophic.

    1. Re:Analogue! by matt20102 · · Score: 1
      I posit that the record will actually be pretty easy to play in 20 years:

      In the United States, annual vinyl sales increased by 85.8% between 2006 and 2007,[50] and by 89% between 2007 and 2008.[51]

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramophone_record#Current_status

      Thanks in large part to the sterility of digital recordings and the popularity of 'vintage technology' among audiophiles and DJs, the 'record' has a lot in its favor- simplicity of the playback mechanism, for one. (heck, how much different from a record is a CD? It's just a record with much smaller grooves, quantized data, and an optical stylus).

  43. 12cm shiny disk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we have been using 12cm shiny disks that read with a laser for over 25 years. some of the details have changed (CD, CD-R, DVD, blueray), but all the readers can still read the original CD. I guess the average 1st world house hold has a few hundred 12cm shiny disks that they will keep wanting to read. I'd expect in 25 years time we will still have some medium that uses the same size disk, and where the readers can still read all previous versions.

    if you get archive grad CR-R you should be fine.

  44. Assume advanced teck in the future by smallfeet · · Score: 1

    Beam the messages into space and just assume there will be faster then light travel by then.

  45. USB or DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USB is safe, but I would say, put it all on a DVD and get one of the rich uncles to put a portable DVD player in the captual with it so that the device is there.

  46. Save the players, not just the medium. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    What you ought to do, is get a decent (but definitely used) computer that has all the multimedia capability to play the disks / files / whatever you are storing. Complete with operating system and necessary software. It sounds like overkill, but it's pretty inexpensive these days, especially used.

    Just make sure you put it all (computer AND media) in a consistently cool, dark, and dry place. Temperature variations and strong light are the most likely culprits for ruining media (and anything else, for that matter), so bury it all somewhere deep, in several nested vacuum packs, and with plenty of silica gel to keep it dry.

  47. I recommend stone or fired clay tablets by maroberts · · Score: 1

    CDs and DVDs have been proven to be unreliable, electronic devices won't last that long, paper is prone to water ingress, so go back to ancient tech which you know survives... its the only way to be sure.

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  48. CD's are still around but to be sure... by Time_Warped · · Score: 3, Informative

    I would include a player for any media you have. I am still trying to cope with all my Mom's trays of slides...Oh, and make sure you include descriptions of the participants, I have a lot of old slides of people I presume are cousins, but I am not sure exactly who they are....

    1. Re:CD's are still around but to be sure... by Fotograf · · Score: 1

      simple, scanner for 100Eur. What is so complicated?

      --
      God's gift to chicks
    2. Re:CD's are still around but to be sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, HP and Lexmark both sell some nifty automatic slide scanners. Just stack 20 slides onto the feeder, push start, come back after a while.

  49. whatever you do ... by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    ... make sure that anything that uses batteries has the batteries removed. Otherwise you'll likely find ruined electronics in 16 years from leakage.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:whatever you do ... by Megane · · Score: 1

      Yeah, remove the batteries from that iPod people keep suggesting they put in there. Oh, wait...

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  50. EPROM chip? by pengipengi · · Score: 1

    I guess that electricity is still avalible in 16 years.
    I guess that people can read datasheets.
    I guess people still remember the binary system.

    Then, keep it simple: Use a EPROM-chip with paralell address, paralell data. Print the datasheet for the chip on paper and a description of the file system. (Design one simple by yourself, or use tar and print it's specification).

    Worst case: They have to get someone to design the hardware themselfs... I could build a reader for that here with a small microcontroller in 30 minutes. It's really simple actually...

    But use it just as an option if some other more modern techonology fails, like USB flashdrive... Redundancy...

    1. Re:EPROM chip? by TheBig1 · · Score: 1

      This is a cool idea for small amounts of data; however, the article submitter (and myself, for personal archival projects) need to store many GBs of data. Even if you get a number of large EEPROM chips, you are probably looking at tens of MBs (Digikey's largest parallel EEPROM chip is 1MB, and costs $30, so you can't get a whole bunch). Great for text documents, but it wouldn't come close to storing even a few digital pictures or audio, let alone video. If you are just looking to store text and a few pictures, go analog and print them.

      Personally, I would go the analog route myself anyway in this scenario, possibly with some digital hardware *just in case* you can get it working.

      Cheers

  51. hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Store the hardware/software needed to read the data with the data. Storing a record works fine if there is also a record player.

    1. Re:hardware by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      What's a "record player"? Is that like a "write reader"?

  52. 3,5" floppies by freedumb2000 · · Score: 1

    They will be retro hip again.

  53. Simple Solution, really by Fotograf · · Score: 0

    when we started it with our kids 8 years ago, we have regulary archived NAS server where are all data stored. server got upgraded several times, but data are still valid. JPEGs, TXT, PDF, MP3, AVI, will all work in 17 years. Same for SD cards, USB sticks, but upgraded harddrives are best option for really lot of data. How do i know? Only 9 years to go since we started and didnt changed that much since, really. 17 years is nothing. I still can with little effort read oldest HDDs but do not need to since we move our time capsule to newer media as age progresses. It is also better to not use proprietary formats because you never know how it will be with support of WMV or WMA in 10 years.

    --
    God's gift to chicks
    1. Re:Simple Solution, really by Fotograf · · Score: 1

      p.s. do not forget the treasure box for physical things and old toys. We have there everything, from positive pregnancy test, through first hair cuts, feet and hands copies, etc.

      --
      God's gift to chicks
  54. Stone Tablets by Danathar · · Score: 1

    As I understand it, microetched stone tablets are being researched as the most effective long term storage medium, of course it might be a bit difficult to read...

  55. it's only 16 years by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    It's not that hard to find working equipment from 1993 today. I suspect it will be pretty straight forward to read a CD-RW or USB stick. Not convinced that 16 years is a short while, how about this? Fry's still sells floppy disks for some bizarre reason.
    Maybe pack a small computer (take the 3V coin cell out) would smooth things along. Although should be easy enough to find on a classified ads (if craigslist is still around) or online auction (if ebay didn't collapse under its own stupidity by then). HDMI should still be easy to find 16 years from now, so you might consider paying a DVI to HDMI cable (DVI will probably be replaced with a new connector in a matter of a few years) assuming that small computer has DVI (eeebox? a bit slow might be an embarassment to show a future generation). I would avoid VGA, likely video and computer equipment of the future won't muck with analog. It's cheaper to dump analog support and go pure digital from a manufacturing point of view than support both.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:it's only 16 years by Megane · · Score: 1

      Floppy discs? Only the 3 1/2" size. There were two successful sizes before that. (and a few that didn't last five years)

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re:it's only 16 years by andre_pl · · Score: 1

      Just curious, but what gives you the impression that HDMI Will be around in 16 years?
      I dont think its all that unlikely, but I also dont see any reason to believe it wont be gone in 5 years.

    3. Re:it's only 16 years by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      5 1/4" floppies were displaced by 3 1/2" by the mid 1980s. 5 1/4"'s reign over the 8" format only lasted about 10 years. 3 1/2" floppies have been on the market for 27 years now and continue to be manufactured. I'm not suggesting you use it as an archival format. I'm just pointing out that 16 years is not a very long time for media formats, and it is not terrible difficult to read an "obsolete" format after such a short while because a niche market usually remains and there is plenty of still functional used equipment readily available out there.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    4. Re:it's only 16 years by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      For two reasons, first manufacturers have historically preserved "obsolete" connectors for a long time if at least a few people are still using them. Second you need something dramatically better the HDMI or backwardly compatible to displace it in the market. DisplayPort has no chance in displacing HDMI for home AV equipment, we may see TVs that have one in addition to one or more HDMI ports. But there are still things HDMI can do that DisplayPort cannot. And I believe that HDMI is good enough to remain dominate for at least another 5-7 years (because it's "good enough"), and it will hang around for another 10 just like the S-Video.

      Many of us have not even upgraded to HDMI capable systems yet (neither of my TVs have it). Think of the millions of Americans forced to upgrade to HDTV. Instead of buying a fancy new set that likely would have had HDMI most of them bought a converter box. There is still a couple years to go for it to be a universal interface.

      Realize that most of us have S-Video connectors on our TVs. Manufacturers feel that there might be at least one person that still needs one, even though the connector proved to be very unpopular in the market beyond its use for VHS decks. Technically it is superior to the simple RCA composite jacks, but inferior to component input, SCART, VGA and HDMI. TVs tend to still have them, but cheapo DVD players are not bothering with them anymore. S-Video came and went with Super VHS for the most part. It is the only way to get decent video quality out of a VHS deck, due to the way they operate you can't find ones with fancy component output or HDMI output that don't just re-encode the s-video signals back into component/HDMI (good luck finding one, I never did).

      Home Depot still sells those twin-lead antenna to F-connector adapters. (300-to-75-ohm balun, a type of transformer). When was the last time you had a device that used twin-leads? I think my RF switch box for my home computer had them. I suppose you might want it if you ran twin-lead instead of coax cables to an outdoor antenna. Most (all?) indoor models seem to have coax already, and have for at least a decade as far as I can remember.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    5. Re:it's only 16 years by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Pick any video standard used in the past 30 years, then go to an electronics store and seeing if there isn't a brand new TV that will accept that kind of signal. Coax, RCA, S-Video, component, VGA, DVI, etc. all seem to be well supported. HDMI may be superseded by some new format by then, but I would be very surprised if no new TVs in 16 years have an HDMI connector. Heck, chances are pretty good that you would have no problems finding a TV to hook up your 40 year-old VHS deck either.

  56. How about a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FIRST POST

  57. If you can't remember that far back, wikipedia it. by argent · · Score: 4, Informative

    20 years ago, an 8track would have been the thing to store information on.

    20 years ago CDs were almost 10 years old, and 8-track was already "20 years ago, and you'd have a hard time finding a player".

  58. Post files on internet by AJ+Mexico · · Score: 1

    If you want to preserve digital data, post it online. Give the files some whacky, unique keyword that she can search for when she is 17. Put the keyword in the box. Once stuff is on the net it never seems to die. Everybody's ancient USENET posts are still available. And somebody else is responsible for updating the storage medium occasionally.

    --
    Computers obey me.
  59. Use redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Store it on different medias like CD/DVD/USB flash/sd card/paper :D/etc... and 16 years later you might have some hardware/someone laying around that can replay/read one of these

  60. We got the Internet u know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Register 16yearslater.com and add content over the years ... put a paper with the URL into the timecapsule.
    Done.

  61. Re:With the cut price components used these days.. by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    "My impression is that build quality on 1987 386s was better than on current equipment."

    Indeed they were. Back in those days a PC was an expensive business item as was built accordingly. These days they're just disposable commodity items built to a price. Expecting them to function perfectly in 16 years time is IMO a touch optimistic.

  62. Print data as images. by ath1901 · · Score: 1

    Encode all data as 2D images and print them. Also print the algorithm for decoding the data (in plain text).

    If your niece isn't geeky enough to scan the images and implement the decoding algorithm (in some cool futuristic language), she doesn't deserve any presents.

  63. This Topic by techsoldaten · · Score: 4, Funny
    This topic comes up every couple years or so. There is a good thread about archival media that is still surprisingly relevant today. My original response to the question is available here.

    "For my clients, I always suggest the use of stone and / or clay tablets for all mission critical data archive projects, regardless of size or scope. Bablyonian and Greek models of data retention from as far back as 4,500 years ago are (in many cases) superior to the models we commonly use today, with much of the physical media having survived electrical storms, tornadoes, floods, fires, and wars on every scale imaginable with a data corruption rate of zero and without the benefit of a climate controlled room, dedicated security staff, or even a closet for media storage. Imagine the elegance of a 84'3/4 STROM (Stone Tablet Read Only Memory) machine hooked up to your Slackware Archive server for performing restorations, and the ST Binary Writer you have networked to your backup systems and kept physically over by the quarry... nice! The TCO for slab is far less than that of tape archives, considering you can store the media in a pile of mud and hose it down when you are ready for a restoration."

    M

    1. Re:This Topic by matt20102 · · Score: 1

      The data corruption rate is hardly zero for STROM. Go to any museum and look at all of the stone tablets which are either cracked apart or eroded (i.e., corrupted memory). One must then also consider all of the tablets, accidently cracked in antiquity, whose existence we will never know (corrupted MBR, perhaps?). And then there are also tablets written in defunct languages for whom a suitable 'reader' has yet to be found....

    2. Re:This Topic by techsoldaten · · Score: 1

      The potential for catastrophic data loss using STROM differs based on the methods of storage, just as with any medium. For instance, if you leave CDRs in the sun too long, they are going to screw up. Factoring in long term data preservation goals when constructing your data retention plan and taking steps to secure the data is an essential part of any data retention strategy. Displaying your data backups in public squares, as part of reliefs on buildings of worship, or within the construction of walls of civic facilities is a recipe for disaster and there is a large set of case studies that prove this point. Mud, tar pits, caves, and just plain burying them with sand are all reliable methods of preserving information stored on STROM disks. As for data corruption, yes, there is a data loss rate that accompanies the use of the physical medium over time, and modifications in formatting and codecs for decryption can affect the overall quality of the data. Again, this is no different than any other physical medium, and there are no alternative formats in existance that have survived as long as the earliest known examples of STROM disks. M

  64. Re:With the cut price components used these days.. by skiman1979 · · Score: 1

    Why not just pack an old 286 or 386 laptop (with AC adapter and no battery) instead of a new netbook? Old systems seem to last longer if properly stored. The hard drive will hold a lot less data, but you could pack multiple hard drives. Maybe even open the capsule every now and then to backup/restore the data just in case.

    --
    Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
  65. Flash drives by spywhere · · Score: 1

    Plural, as in two flash drives with the same contents (in case one breaks). .RTF, .JPG, .MP3 and .MOV files will all be legible in 2019.

  66. Risky Proposition by EmagGeek · · Score: 2, Informative

    Let's look back 17 years, to 1992. I was just starting college at Georgia Tech. I had a 12MHz 286 with a 40MB RLL hard disk, 360k and 720k floppy drives, and a CGA monitor. I did buy a brand new machine my first quarter - a blazing fast 386 DX-40 with 4MB of Ram, 1.44mb floppy, a 120MB hard disk, and a 800x600 super VGA monitor. it cost over $1000.

    Most everything is still around: the Parallel IDE interface, the floppy drives, and the VGA connector. We've also had some new things: USB, Serial ATA, DVI, and so on, but if you had to find hardware that could read an old hard disk, you could.

    The problem with the time capsule is... well... time. If you leave a hard drive to sit for 17 years, I doubt it would be able to spin up. I think the same would be true for just about any mechanical device.

    How about non-volatile memory, like FLASH? Well, FLASH definitely has a finite retention period - usually 10 to 20 years, so even then you're taking a risk of losing data.

    Optical disk? Well, now we're talking. Archival-quality media stored in controlled, ideal conditions will hold data on the order of 20+ years. It's the controlled, ideal conditions that make it tough. If exposed to heat, humidity, and temperature cycling, even the best archival quality media can be destroyed in a matter of months.

    So, I think the best thing to do would be to maintain the materials unknown to the child until it is time to reveal the time capsule. Either that, or "dig up" the time capsule every few years and refresh the contents by replacing the media on which they are stored.

    1. Re:Risky Proposition by Megane · · Score: 1

      IDE's success is probably as much luck as anything else. SCSI had a chance back then too. But it does help that IDE esentially took the computer-side interface of the HD interface chips of the day, and put that on the hard drive, and banished forever any analog interface on hard drives. The protocol still evolved, though, and you might have trouble reading an old 40MB drive if you don't know its C/H/S specs, but at least the old commands are still supported.

      Optical disc? Just try finding archival-quality recordable discs at Best Buy. Many CD-R discs won't survive a year when kept indoors in a storage book. And good luck finding "controlled, ideal conditions" in a buried time capsule. At least the CD format seems like it'll be universailly supported for some time to come, as long as we're still using 5 inch optical media. I suppose you could always have a minimum 100 quantity printed by a CD/DVD mastering company and just throw the whole spindle in there. At least it would give you lots of redundancy.

      USB flash drives aren't a bad choice. Sure, there is some possible data loss, but I think it's going to be longer than 10-20 years... many EPROMs from the '80s still haven't erased after 20+ years, despite the concerns of bit rot. But the USB standard, just like CD and IDE (and SCSI), was designed to be extensible, and has reached a point where it is unlikely to be replaced by something completely different in 20 years. And unlike IDE, it doesn't have an enormous bulky connector, which is why parallel IDE is on the way out right now.

      Sure, it's possible that suddenly we'll go wireless-everything, but I don't think that's likely because of interference and bandwidth problems. And I've even seen pet collars that hold small USB memory sticks.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  67. NASA Style by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Have your presentation laser-etched onto gold plates, and include a gold record with etched instructions on how to create a device to play back the information! Then you can safely pass your time capsule down from generation to generation with no degradation of quality!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  68. Variation on the Theme by magusxxx · · Score: 1

    Here's an interesting idea I saw on TV once. You buy a set of clothes that would fit a 17 year old. Every year you take a picture of the child with the clothes. As they grow up, they'll get bigger until they'll finally fit in them. When the child turns 17, give her a photo frame with will cycle through the images and show how she has grown over the years. As for the time capsule, I'd have everyone put low cost items in the time capsule. Then, pool all the money you would have wasted on the outdated electronics and buy her some silver/gold coins. By the time she goes to college she'd have a nice sum of extra money to spend on a top-of-the-line computer. (Or mattering on the economy, a car!)

    --
    Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
    1. Re:Variation on the Theme by Megane · · Score: 1

      The best part is how at the end of the 17 years, you can laugh at how stupid the kid looks in whatever was cool 17 years ago. "Mom, what IS New Kids On The Block anyhow?"

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re:Variation on the Theme by maxume · · Score: 1

      I know quite a few people who were 6 feet tall and pretty much done growing when they turned 14 or 15.

      I guess it would also make some people cry, as they watched themselves balloon up to fatness.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Variation on the Theme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Thanks For The ... Flares, Uncle Alex.

  69. You have two options by drake123 · · Score: 1

    First as many others have suggested, you can store the information on a regular data storage device and store any further requirements for reading the data along with it. As long as the stored components aren't damaged you can read back the information. This way a large amount of data can be stored, but it relies heavily on the build quality of the components. Examples are usb sticks, cdroms etc.

    Second, you could store the data in a simple format; store the specification of the format along with some information on how to build a device that can retrieve the information. Sadly the simpler the format is (and the simpler it is to make the playback hardware) the less data can be stored. Examples are vinyl discs (can be played back with a needle and a paper horn), 8mm video (needs only a light source, and something to wind the film with).

    Combining the two options would be the best choice, if somehow we could design a simple machine that when built, could make a more sophisticated one that could in turn read the rest of the data. That way only a simple machine would have had to be described in some human readable language, and then built.

  70. Small webserver by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

    Have the reader inside. Put inside the capsule a small webserver with ethernet and wifi capabilities, to be connected on regular AC 110V. Ethernet is 30 years old and shows no sign of weakness. I bet that wifi will still work as well in 16 years. Make it a simple web/http/ftp server that allows connection, vizualization and download of the data. In 16 years, I don't know if you will use a laptop, a watch, a cell phone or a brain-plug to connect to it, but I am fairly sure that it will be able to connect with ethernet and/or wifi.

    16 years seem short enough to me that one can use either hard disks or (good) optical discs to store the data. I would like to recommend SSD, but let's face it : we are not sure how well it ages.

    I would personally go with two copies of the data stored on two different model, good quality HDs. That way, if one version gets corrupted, the other will work fine.

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    1. Re:Small webserver by Megane · · Score: 1

      And what if the motors on both HDs fail to spin up from being buried in the ground for 10-20 years? And "Oh gosh, this uses IP version FOUR? We're on SEVEN now."

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re:Small webserver by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      I hope it is considered to be buried in a air-tight capsule. I think that a motor failure on both HDs have a low probability of happening. Good HDs can last that long while being used intensively, I doubt that not using them would make them last less.

      Good point about IP, but IPv4 is almost 30 years old and continues to be widely used. I doubt that IPv6 would be obsolete in 16 years. My point on using ethernet, however, was on the physical interface. If you have an ethernet plug on your quantum-DNA-optical computer, and an IP-ish protocol, at the very worse, you will be able to use an emulator to boot an old version of Ubuntu 15, the last one before support to IPv4 was dropped, transfer your files, and convert them in something usable. I think the big problem is the hardware, not the software. And ethernet plugs are probably still here for a long time.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  71. IE6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would suggest any format that can be viewed through IE6 - it will still be around.

  72. Density by tepples · · Score: 3, Funny

    What is writing? Encoding of information. Nothing else.

    What is paper? An insufficiently dense medium for encoding huge volumes of data such as audio or video, even with a 75-square-inch block of QR Code on each page. Nothing else.

    1. Re:Density by buchner.johannes · · Score: 1

      You can store half a megabyte per side of page side, if you use PaperBack (has been discussed here before).

      Now you can store your 5 minutes video on about 78 pages. Would be great if that sources zip file made it into archive.org

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    2. Re:Density by maxume · · Score: 1
      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  73. The winner is: a book, then a USB stick by malbrech · · Score: 1

    Reading the comments so far, I can only agree with a book being the winner. It has the additional advantage that it will probably be a museum piece by the time she gets to open it -- wait, I forgot that at least another 1000 guys will be doing the same after this slashdot post ...

    If it had to be digital because of video, I would bet for a USB stick. In fact, I would even bet that by 2025 we will be using USB 10.0 or something ridiculous like that. There are few technologies that have a long life, but those which make it to that status do tend to last very long. Examples: ethernet, cd-roms, HFS harddisks. I count USB in that camp because of its versatility.

  74. What to give to one year old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoever tagged it dildo is nominated to be a slashdot editor.

    1. Re:What to give to one year old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was searching the comments to see if someone had said it before I got a chance to post. God bless you, whoever you are.

    2. Re:What to give to one year old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... to a 17 year old, if you can read the summary.

  75. isn't it obvious? by Cyko_01 · · Score: 1

    floppy disks! it might take a few dozen but those things always work!

  76. a slither? don't you mean a sliver? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Sorry, don't mean to be a jerk, but this is another "Well it sounds like what I heard so I'll use it".

    Slither is a method of transportation used by snakes, horny chicks and most lawyers. "You could see her slither across the room from one man to the next, trying to find just what she wanted"

    A sliver is a small piece of a larger item. "Worry about the log (huge chunk of wood) in your own eye, before working about the sliver (small, tiny piece of wood) in your brother's"

    I guess it's a pet peeve of mind when people use what they think the word is just because it sounds close. Little kids do that. There's no excuse for adults.

  77. Oil Barrel by JohnHegarty · · Score: 2, Funny

    Make sure you bury one barrel of oil with it.

    It won't help you with the message, but should pay for 4 years at a moderately priced college.

  78. iPod Touch by weazzle · · Score: 1

    Get a new iPod touch, load it with all the media you want her to hear/see. Wrap it in three inches of duct tape so nobody runs off with the power adapter. NEMA 5-15 receptacles probably won't go anywhere in sixteen years.

  79. Wine! by chocapix · · Score: 1

    Get a couple bottles of really good wine and store them carefully. You want at least two in case one of them turns bad (shit happens).

    I recommend a good Bordeaux, (my favorites are Saint-Estephe). But really, any wine that ages well is going to be great after 16 years.

    1. Re:Wine! by Shrike82 · · Score: 1

      I'm intrigued to know how the OP can encode the information he's talking about into bottles of wine. Do you have a plan for that part or should we all reply with our own ideas?

      --
      You can advertise in this sig from as little as £99.99 a month!
  80. Digital Picture Frame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put in a digital picture frame with lots of media (pictures, video, and sound) on the SD card. Sure the tech will be out of style in 16 years, but I doubt 110v outlets will. Most frames you can just plugin and watch [and listen.] A digital picture frame is also a lot cheaper than a full fledged laptop.

  81. Multiple Copies Using Multiple Formats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever the data that is going into the time capsule, put in more than one copy using different types of media. Or at least different brands.

  82. Facebook / Myspace by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

    The kids around here are being told not to put anything on Facebook or Myspace, because it will last "forever", and embarrass and cost them jobs when they are grown up.

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
  83. i have a cool antique by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    i have an old stereoscope from the late 1800's or very early 1900's in perfect condition and a shoebox full of photos to go with it, i never had it appraised but i bet it is worth a few bucks.

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  84. Replies of value. by upuv · · Score: 1

    As a long time /. person I must say I am truly impressed by this thread. I was beginning to loose some faith.

    The concept of a time capsule is fantastic. But to make it relevant to readers was genius. For the most part all responders are offering advice, constructive criticism and basically help.

    17 years would appear to be a modest goal, however I'm fairly positive I have data on formats there is ZERO chance I can read. Even the simple floppy. I simply don't have anything that can read a floppy atm. So there is a two fold problem. 1. What data format will be readable in X years. 2. Will I be able to read format Y in X years.

    This thread offers a ton of advice. Well done /,

    1. Re:Replies of value. by maxume · · Score: 1

      Faith is dangerous stuff, keep a tight grip on it.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  85. Software by Firemouth · · Score: 1

    If you have the need to write any software for this type of project, be sure to write it in COBOL. That stuff is gonna be around forever!

  86. Notary by xsuchy · · Score: 1

    Take same measure as for last will.
    And if you really want to save it in digital format - make agreement with notary to make every year copy of that CD/Disk/Whatever to DVD/Holodisc or whatever will be normally used that year. After 17 year you will end with 17 copies and few recent should be readable without problem. And you will have 16 backup copies.

  87. Re:With the cut price components used these days.. by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

    My motherboard uses high quality capacitors that are made in Japan... But then again my motherboard is a high end $350+ core i7 motherboard.

    Not everyone builds there computer to be disposable.

  88. Dildo? by aquatone282 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I love /. tags!

    --
    What?
  89. why a "physical" time machine? by pmarini · · Score: 1

    you can avoid the "physical" issue by storing the media onto an online account:
    - web space hosting these days is rather inexpensive, you will easily find something for less than $50/year
    - this way you will only have to make sure that the file format is still readable in 16 years time (she's already 1yo)

    --
    Can I put a spell on those who can't spell?
    Your wheels are loose and they're losing their grip, good you're there.
  90. tape master by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what ever you do, make sure you back it all up to tape :D

  91. reply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    include the player

  92. What I did by inKel · · Score: 1

    Some friend of mine had a kid two years ago and what I gave him for his first birthday was a photo album (paper photos), with some texts in between, and also a mini CD-ROM with a text an a video (the "Wear suncream video") and the PortableApps version of VLC. I'm pretty sure in a couple of years he will be able to use it.

    --
    0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 ...
  93. (the closest thing to a geek our family has) by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    (the closest thing to a geek our family has)

    Don't flatter yourself buddy. And don't betray us either.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  94. Netbook by JokerKingg · · Score: 1

    Why not bury it with a netbook or cheap laptop if you absolutely must bury electronics period? The 110V plug we use today will still be in use in the future. Make sure the battery has about a 15% charge, and all the "latest" updates...you'll be 100% golden and working when it's opened; just charge up the battery and voila, working system. I don't think HDD's wil degrade after 15 years of being unpowered will they?

  95. A crisis of permanence by mrdisco99 · · Score: 1

    I think this points out a pretty big problem with our civilization.

    One of the things that have enabled past civilizations to endure and be remembered was their permanence. Every great civilization knew they were leaving a legacy for future generations to look back on. Think of how much we still know about the Egyptians, Greeks, and Romans. They made sure that everything that was important to them was recorded for posterity, and we owe a lot to them for that.

    I laugh when people talk about digitally remastering music, movies, and books in order to preserve them. The Vatican is currently scanning their entire archive and saving it to digital media (CD-ROM). What's going to happen, though, when CD-ROM drives are no longer profitable to make because the next new technology has rendered them obsolete? What about when copyright holders or companies with exclusive rights to certain types of media go out of business? Just think of the effort involved to keep the data we already enjoy now up to date. How many times has the Beatles been remastered on new formats in the last 50 years? Just one generation of people who thinks of it as passe is enough for it to be lost forever.

    So much of what is written now, including this, is only available on "the net" which is the most transitory medium we've come up with yet. How much of what is on the net today do you think will still be readable 100 years from now. Any of it? I still have a hard time getting to stuff from 10 years ago. And this is what is killing off our newspapers.

    When our civilization dies off like all the others have, what will we leave behind? What will people of the future be able to learn from us? Are all the advances we've made in science, technology, engineering, medicine, being recorded in a way that will ensure permanence for the future? Or are we so focused on the short term in everything we do, that no one will even know we existed?

    --

    +++
    NO CARRIER

  96. It's not the player, it's the medium by mbone · · Score: 1

    I have no doubt in 16 years that you will be able to find CD readers, or DVD readers or, for that matter, 8-track players. (There is an active 8-track underground now, and they get players from somewhere.) They may or may not be common, but they will be available.

    No, the real question is, whether your media will be playable. Will a particular CD-ROM or DVD-ROM you make last that long ? And the answer is - who knows ? It depends on your particular physical artifact. how it was made, how it is stored, etc. This is typically way longer than the manufacturers will guarantee.

    My rule of thumb is that only data that is "live" will last. So, if you want this to last, burn some DVD's, and then give the same data to every member of the family who will take it, and tell them to put it on their hard drives and keep it there. And then, make a list of those people, and the file names, and put that list in your time capsule. If you do that, between the chance of your media being readable, and the chance of someone keeping that file for 16 years, you will probably be OK.

    Let us know in 2025, OK ?

  97. Whatever you do use open formats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever you do, stay away from proprietary formats.
    Keep the programs that access the data with the data.
    Optical media burned at home last about 5 years (max) - yes, there are exceptions, but I'm seeing my oldest data DVDs starting to fail now.

    Use parity (par2) with all the data and programs, so a tiny bit failure doesn't remove all hope of recovery. Obviously, a complete media failure will lose all the data.

    Personally, I'd put it on paper and put "things" into the time capsule rather than data. If you must, put data on both a CDROM and USB Flash drive. Since many TVs have USB ports for JPG display, that tech will still probably be around and backward compatible in 15 years. The local daily newspaper is always a winner.

    Check out http://ronja.twibright.com/optar/ for long term data storage. It is just 200k per page, but you'll have the program.

  98. well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a netbook,load it up, take batty out, dunno how batties last over 16 years, but I am sure in 16 years we will still use power outlets.

  99. easy by karaage · · Score: 1

    Put it on a netbook, and throw in a PSU. AC Power has changed little in one hundred years; we'll still be using it in sixteen.

  100. The power of compounding by cbraescu1 · · Score: 1

    Use the wisdom of warren Buffet and invest the equivalent of whatever you guys wanted to buy for the time capsule. For guaranteed better results than anything else, invest in a low-fee S&P 500 mutual fund.

    She'll thank you later :-)

    --
    Catalin Braescu
    Ofaly.com
  101. you're doing it wrong! by Ephemeriis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My niece just turned one year old and her parents have asked that, instead of the usual gifts, we each contribute something to a time capsule to be opened on her 17th birthday. Multiple members of my family want to contribute digital data - text, video, music files.

    Data doesn't go into time capsules. There's absolutely no reason why you couldn't share that text, video, or music with her at any point over the next 17 years. And she'll likely be exposed to it anyway... Music will be playing on the radio, books will be available, folks will share family pictures and videos...

    It might make sense to include a photograph with a note on the back, or a couple-page letter to her... But you don't just stuff the capsule full of digital data. That stuff would be better archived on a live computer and updated over the next few years.

    What you put into a time capsule are physical objects. Think back to 17 years ago... What would be more fun to stumble across - an mp3 of I'm Too Sexy , or a working minidisc player?

    What physical objects are new/cool/important/meaningful right now, that may not be later? Maybe throw a pair of her baby shoes in there... Grab something small off your dining room table or out of your front yard... Maybe the cell phone you just replaced... A couple ticket stubs to something that just opened... Toss in a cheap mp3 player (something that takes disposable batteries, like AA/AAA) loaded with some current songs on it...

    In 17 years, when she opens it, you'll be able to say "Those shoes were on your feet 17 years ago. I talked on that cell phone 17 years ago. That's what we used to listen to music 17 years ago." And she'll be able to pick the things up, handle them, feel them, turn them on, see how they worked, compare them to whatever is current. Instead of just firing up a home-made version of I Love the '80s

    --
    "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:you're doing it wrong! by inerlogic · · Score: 1

      just don't include any batteries!
      batteries can leak over time and ruin the electronics, as well as anything else in the time capsule....

    2. Re:you're doing it wrong! by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      "Thanks for the baby shoes...is this supposed to be an unsubtle message that it's time I start having children?"

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    3. Re:you're doing it wrong! by Ephemeriis · · Score: 1

      just don't include any batteries!
      batteries can leak over time and ruin the electronics, as well as anything else in the time capsule....

      Right. Should've specified that... That's why you want easily-replaceable batteries like AA/AAA - so you don't have to pack any in the time capsule and can easily purchase some whenever it is opened.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    4. Re:you're doing it wrong! by Vitani · · Score: 1
      Best answer yet.

      I prefer physical presents (CDs) today than things that are virtual (MP3s) for my birthday, and in 16 years time, virtual presents may be the norm, and at that time physical presents would be really nice.

    5. Re:you're doing it wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consider also including photographs of those physical objects in their original settings. A dress that the child wore at age 1 is a nice-to-have, but it's even more meaningful if it comes with a family picture including her wearing the dress.

      In fact, it might be particularly clever and endearing to include the clothing from all the members of that family picture, allowing the same picture to be re-created a generation or two later.

    6. Re:you're doing it wrong! by GravityStar · · Score: 1

      You're good at this.

    7. Re:you're doing it wrong! by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      What you put into a time capsule are physical objects. Think back to 17 years ago... What would be more fun to stumble across - an mp3 of I'm Too Sexy [youtube.com] , or a working minidisc [wikipedia.org] player?

      I have a working minidisc player right here in my desk drawer. It's been a few years since I used it since I got the iRiver, but its still there with its A/C adapter.

  102. Re:If you can't remember that far back, wikipedia by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    How much do you want to bet that I can produce an 8-track player within 24 non-weekend hours? One in good working order, even? It's not even difficult. (Actually, I think my dad still has one collecting dust in his room, but that's cheating. I see them at thrift stores and flea markets all the damn time.)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  103. How about an entire laptop? by Simulant · · Score: 1

        Assuming the hard drive is still readable, at least she won't have to hunt down hardware and you can probably find a used one for $100. I've got 10 year old laptops that still work fine.

  104. Whatever you do, don't encrypt it! by agrif · · Score: 1

    I fear for future historians, having to go through all these encrypted Blu-Ray movies as the only hard-format source of cinema from our culture. What will they do when the last licensed Blu-Ray player goes kaput? Hope there's a nice archive of keys just hanging around somewhere?

    1. Re:Whatever you do, don't encrypt it! by johanwanderer · · Score: 1

      You mean, in addition to all the compression techniques and media formats?

      That's why a lot of the posts recommend including redundant working players and media. That way, some tinkerers in the future will have a chance of cobbing together a working reader.

  105. Pre pay for an Iron Mountain Account by bpeikes · · Score: 1

    If you want to be sure that you can at least access the data, why not have everyone chip in for a tiny account at Iron Mountain. Companies entrust their data with them, as for playback, that's a little tougher, but I would guess that mp3 for audio, jpg for images should be fine, video might be a little trickier.

    1. Re:Pre pay for an Iron Mountain Account by maxume · · Score: 1

      A lot of the mpeg patents should have expired by then, so FFMPEG (and all the projects that utilize it...VLC, mplayer, etc.) should be going strong. If that is the case, the encoding of the video probably isn't all that important, it will likely be supported.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  106. Steve jobs has the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put an unused (except to put the data on it) iPhone (or something with the necessary multimedia playback capabilities) and a charger in the time capsule.

  107. 16 years isn't very long... but.... by inerlogic · · Score: 1

    the BEST way to store data is in human readable form....
    technology comes and goes.... but, data stored optically, like... actually... optically as in slides.... can always be read.... as long as she;s not blind and has a light handy...

    i've got stereo slides my grandparents shot back in the 50's... color 3d slides... (they left a few of the 3d viewers behind)

  108. Redundancy by Peganthyrus · · Score: 1

    Put all the stuff on physical media, as suggested many times above. But in addition to this, put it on the net. Multiple times.

    Make a "sarah'stimecapsule" email account on gmail, yahoo, hotmail, and whatever other free e-mail providers you can find. Write down the account info on a piece of paper that goes into the capsule; email all this data to all of these accounts. Mergers, buyouts, and business collapses may take some of these out, but if you have several then the chance of one of them surviving twenty years increases.

    Upload it to places like rapidshare, filefront, sendspace, etc. Spend a few bucks to create an account on the service so it won't get deleted almost immediately. Put those URLs on paper too.

    Post it to Google Docs, flickr, picasa, etc. Put the account info down on that paper.

    Put it in "the cloud" a couple dozen times, in a couple dozen ways. Maybe one of them will survive. Maybe not.

    And when you're storing the physical copy, be redundant as well - get a couple hard drives and throw it on there, burn it to DVD, Blu-Ray, maybe even CD if it's not going to fill forty of those. Drop it onto some USB memory sticks. Those all go in the capsule.

    And if you really want to be redundant, get a netbook or laptop and put that in there too. You know it can read all these formats. Take its battery out, include the power brick. Set it up to boot with the appropriate reader programs right there on the desktop.

    --
    egypt urnash minimal art.
  109. Re:If you can't remember that far back, wikipedia by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

    I know where to find several, but none of them are at brick and mortar retailers as new devices.

    Luckily we have ebay.

    --
    - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  110. USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it hasn't already been said I'd be willing to bet that USB will still be fairly easy to "read" 17 years into the future. Even if motherboards no longer have USB 12.1 ports that are backwards compatible all the way to USB 1.0, I bet you'll still be able to get a "USB reader" that a USB key can plug into and then plug into whatever futuristic port is on computers in 17 years.

    Bottom line, USB keys are cheap, they don't have moving parts and I would imagine the data would be safer for 17 years than a BD-R or DVD-R, or anything like a hard disk.

  111. Re:If you can't remember that far back, wikipedia by rho · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I can put my hands on an 8-track player and a stack of old radio shows on 8-track cassettes.

    It's not that difficult. That said, I wouldn't want to be looking for a functional 5 1/4" floppy drive.

    --
    Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
  112. Voyager by Kvasio · · Score: 1

    Use same hardware as on Voyager space probes. They are designed to last tens thousands of years.

  113. 16 years is nothing by edgarmoon · · Score: 1

    Except for maybe cheap DVD's. those are only expected to last 5-10 years. Probably the same for BluRay (although I wouldn't bank on that long term). Most magnetic tape should survive, I have 20 year old VHS tapes that still play, in fact I just converted wedding footage from 1982 last year, crappy footage but that was from the original equipment (not enough light), not deterioration. Throw in a camcorder, that should cover your. Or better yet, a hard drive media player, I'm doing all my digital archiving on hard drive now. The tv interface is not going to change in 16 years, and if it does then there will be adapters. Or at the least a coaxial equivalent terminal. Our tv sets run off of the same inputs as used in the 50's. If you really want a long lasting medium, may I recommend film. You should still be able to get 8mm film, I have some 8 and 16mm going back over 50 years, properly preserved there is no deterioration. Just include a small projector. Pictures on good quality paper also survive decades (not inkjet, get them professionally made). Or, you can always wait another year for the 1000 year archive dvd, throw that and a small dvd player in. Even if the format changes all you need is electricity.

    1. Re:16 years is nothing by codeguy007 · · Score: 1

      Top quality DVD+/-Rs will last upto 100 years, theoretically. Top quality CD-Rs upto 200. Even lesser quality DVD+/-Rs and good DVD-R/Ws should last 30 years. No problem using them in this case.

      http://www.osta.org/technology/dvdqa/dvdqa11.htm

    2. Re:16 years is nothing by inerlogic · · Score: 1

      yeh....
      i work with digital media, i can send you some CDRs and DVDRs from clients that didn't last 4 days...
      or 4 months, mold, labels peeling.... the only thing optical media should be trusted for is sneakernet.

    3. Re:16 years is nothing by codeguy007 · · Score: 1

      I have CD-Rs that are 10 years old that still work. In a sealed container like time capsule, you won't have to worry about mold or water.

    4. Re:16 years is nothing by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Note that this is all just claims based on tests under condtions that are supposed to accelerate ageing by some huge factor.

      The problem with that of course is that such tests may accelerate some ageing mechanisms and not others and therefore not accurately predict what will happen decades down the line.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  114. Why seal the data up in a "time capsule"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... when you can just archive it and convert it to whatever format is most current?

    When a particular format is dying, or hard to read, just convert the data to something newer and be done with it.

    You don't have to seal everything up in a physical "time capsule" and leave it there for 17 years.

  115. IPOD or PSP by codeguy007 · · Score: 1

    Why not put a media player in the time capsule? a used IPOD or PSP? Put the media on the player and maybe a dvd as backup just in case the player no longer works. (Hardware can have a shelf life some times)

  116. thinking in the box by redGiraffe · · Score: 1

    Here's a thought: Why not bury a laptop with all the data on it? That way you store the mean to read the data again, but maybe install a media friendly OS that you will be able to work 16 years from now (because computer interfaces will have improved SOOOO much by then you won'y be able to work Windows Vista).

    You probably don't want to store the battery connected, I'm not sure..

  117. Do a Cowboy Beebop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put it on Betamax!! The fun part of opening it when she is 17 will be finding a Betamax player! =D

    (This was done in Cowboy Beebop, Good anime...)

  118. In some parts of the world... by MikeV · · Score: 1

    ...it's called a "book." Papyri and parchment has been found that are thousands of years old that are still legible - and that stuff was often rolled up and stuffed into a clay jar and tossed into a cave or tomb. Surely today's archival quality paper and hermetically sealing capabilities can leave us with books that will last for tens of thousands of years if not more!!! Be sure to include a key - translations in many languages - just to increase the likelihood that future archaeologists can use that to decipher this strange language called English. Good thing about books - since they can't hold as much info as CD's, hard-drives, tapes, etc - you get a lot more choosy about the quality of information that gets preserved so a lot of the rubbish is culled. A sim-card with dozens of pictures of baby Jane spewing crushed peas or wearing her bowl as a hat may seem... cute, but if you've seen one spewing or bowl-hat, you seen them all, so one picture will suffice.

  119. Microfiche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microfiche lasts a relatively long time, is conceptually easy to read, and lets you store data more compressed than normal print on paper. (If you use paper, use low acid stuff.)

  120. Re:With the cut price components used these days.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Storing a HD for 16 years might be critical, but a flash storage system should be ok. Latest I read was that the manufacturer of a small cheap flash based uC was guaranteeing a data retention of 40 years (should be sufficient for the controller for my illuminated house number plate ;-) ). SSD will only be critical over this period if it's in use.

    Similar for the capacitors - sure, some electrolytics may dry out, but I still have lying around here (and ocasionally use for test setups) electrolytics that are at least this old. They still work after a fashion, certainly good enough for non-critical applications.

    Finally, don't store the data (and that includes OS and software) exclusively on the built-in SSD. Just duplicate ist on a (couple of) SD cards. Even if all else fails, you should be able to scratch up a card reader (like others mentioned e.g. on ebay or whatever will replace them) that can be matched to your OS in 16 years time. Reading legacy data might be another matter, but plain ASCII text or HTML seems stable enough, anything burdened with IP rights might be problematic.

    The most secure method to store data over this period might be to put it on a rented web server - let others care about maintaining the data integrity and readability. But this somehow goes against the privacy and time capsule aspects of this project...

  121. Maybe it's just the geek in me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But with all the people pointing out that the media format will be obsolete in 16 years, I say "so what?"

    I'm 35 right now, and I have cassette tape recordings of myself from back when I was 2 years old, making silly noises, monosyllabic grunts, and the few words that I learnt to speak, but had no idea what they meant. (Aside from MOM! DAD! and the sorts.) I also have 2 rolls of Double-8 movie film from my first Christmas party. There's nothing of any significant importance on these tapes, but they rock. While finding a projector that would do Double-8 was not an easy task, the cassette tapes are readily played back. This shows that the most widely available media of the time will continue to have a large audience of playback machines available well over 30 years after they were first introduced.

    BUT! I want to stress that finding a Double-8 projector only increased the excitement of finding out what was on those reels of film. Hunting one down, making sure it worked, making sure _I_ knew how to use the frickin' thing, it was all worth it, if not an enhancer.

    So all in all... I'd say put it on whatever media that is currently available, that will be able to stand 16 years without probable data loss. If CD-ROM, DVD-ROM and USB thumb drives aren't widely available in 16 years, you'll still have eBay or whatever the hell the thing of the time is to find old archaic products is. Remember, you're dealing with common home appliances that sold by the millions. Not an obscure, one-off proprietary system from NASA that was built to record the Apollo moon landings. Hunting down equipment to read it, getting it setup, and finally being able to view it will make the ultra crappy quality of the recordings worth the world. (In 16 years, whatever format you use, it'll be crappy.)

  122. Why give stuff that will bore her to death? by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Memorabilia from 16 years ago is going to be completely banal to a 17 year old. Think about memorabilia from 1992 being "opened" in a time capsule by a 17 year old today. Gosh, a VHS tape of "Unforgiven," and a tape of "November Rain" by Guns 'N Roses. This is not exciting.

    Better might be to put in stuff that's 18 years old now. (That is, when she's seventeen, it will be from as long before when she is born as she is old). That might have at least a little bit of nostalgia value in 16 years.

    File formats will be gone, of course, but in 16 years lots of people will still have 2009-vintage technology around, so she'll still be able to access it.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Why give stuff that will bore her to death? by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 1

      Think about memorabilia from 1992 being "opened" in a time capsule by a 17 year old today. Gosh, a VHS tape of "Unforgiven," and a tape of "November Rain" by Guns 'N Roses. This is not exciting.

      I gotta say, this did make me chuckle. It does put things in perspective, doesn't it? Man, Slash is gonna be pissed.

      Better might be to put in stuff that's 18 years old now. (That is, when she's seventeen, it will be from as long before when she is born as she is old). That might have at least a little bit of nostalgia value in 16 years.

      I don't know if that's going to help much. Is she really going to want a copy of C&C Music Factory's "I'm gonna make you sweat" and "Robin Hood: Prince of Theives"?

    2. Re:Why give stuff that will bore her to death? by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why not just leave a couple bottles of good scotch and/or some wine....I like fine old scotches and wines.

      Hell, leave something that will be a collectible then...?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:Why give stuff that will bore her to death? by idontgno · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why not just leave a couple bottles of good scotch....

      If they're old now, drink 'em now. If they're young now, they're not going to improve in the bottle. A bottle of 10-year-old single-malt, stored sealed in the bottle for 35 years, is not 45-year-old single malt. It's a bottle of 10-year-old single-malt in a really dusty bottle.

      That said, after the zombie apocalypse, a good bottle of pre-apocalypse scotch might be quite valuable, either for trade or as an incendiary grenade. So this may be good thinking after all.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    4. Re:Why give stuff that will bore her to death? by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      I'm sick and tired of you hoity toity snobs dismissing post-apocalypse scotch! I find that the infusion of brains pairs quite well with the smokey peaty character.

    5. Re:Why give stuff that will bore her to death? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      depends on a lot of factors. putting in a movie or music is lame. They will be available.
      I would put in some technology with notes like "This was considered a very large flash drive"
      I would also put in a newspaper, sealed of course.
      It might be interesting to see 17 year old news and adds on a media that doesn't exist anymore.

      Also, I would put in a box of Lego.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Why give stuff that will bore her to death? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just leave a couple bottles of good scotch and/or some wine....I like fine old scotches and wines.

      Hell, leave something that will be a collectible then...?

      It doesn't continue aging after it's bottled... Bury a 1 year old bottle of scotch and you will dig up a 1 year old bottle of scotch.

  123. Pass the BRAIN SOAP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, if you're gonna post that you *no* *longer* fantasise about uncle-niece incest, perhaps you should do so as AC?

  124. uh.. iPod touch / mini netbook? by eples · · Score: 1

    Why don't you get a netbook or iPod touch? Put the charger in the capsule. No significant moving parts to break, just charge it up 17 years later and press the "on" button.

    --
    I'm a 2000 man.
  125. Film? by gravis777 · · Score: 1

    I think you had it correct in the summery - go with analog mediums. The difference between analog and digitial is that while both deteriorate over time, if digital deteriorates, you are lucky if you get garbage bits (I have CDs which we recorded stuff off of our DV tapes just 8 years ago that I had to use a CD data recovery on, and parts of the data are just completely gone - I then had to take it into an AVI repair program to make something somewhat watchable). However, I got tapes that, while over 20 years old and the signal has obviously degraded greatly on, is still watchable.

    That being said, your best bet is to probably use film. You will deffinately want to make sure its well sealed, and possibly even put a projector in the capsule.

    Can data survive on CD-Rs and DVDs over that period of time? Yes, but you need to take precautions. Do some research and buy the best media you can. Make sure your burner is good (my burner just started going bad, and I thought it was bad media. Went through about 15 discs before it finally occured to me the burner was going out). Burn at the lowest possible speed. Also, if you are burning video, make sure to include codecs and viewers. You may also want to include a copy of an OS that they may have to run in a virtual machine, but probably not. I mean, 16 years ago, we had low quality AVI files usinc Cinepak and early versions of Quicktime, but you can still play those files in the newer OSes - WITH the right codecs. I got videos from the mid 90s I made that I can still play but I did have to do some serious hunting for the codec. Indeo 4 and Indeo 5 were great codecs back in the day.

    Good luck, and let us know what route you decide to go.

  126. Print it in QR codes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have to go digital, why not print it encoded in QR codes on acid free paper?

    Dan's Data has a good overview of the idea. http://www.dansdata.com/gz094.htm
    He mentions Optar (http://ronja.twibright.com:8080/optar/) and Paperback (http://ollydbg.de/Paperbak/), both of which are open source.

    Print the source code along with the data and you should be set.

  127. Archival Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    B/W Laser printed text on frosted Mylar (polyester) sheets. The toner in the print contains mainly carbon, one of the most stable elements in the universe. And polyester film is rated at a 500 year archivability; it's the gold standard for archivists, used as the base media for microfilm archiving of documents.

    For pictures, an archivally processed fiber based silver gelatin B/W print lasts longer than any other known photographic method. The paper itself is the weak link. You could coat Liquid Light, or another similar liquid B/W photographic emulsion, onto white frosted Mylar sheets, and process those as photographic prints.

    Of course, this implies that you actually have working knowledge of silver gelatin darkroom technology. Which you most likely don't have. So go ahead, put all your data on a DVD data disk. After you're dead, no one will care anyway.

  128. Include a player in the time capsule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Include a player in the time capsule

  129. Buy a Netbook by DrMcNasty · · Score: 1

    Throw in a Net book with all the data you want and the power cable.
    I would like to think that we will still have power outlets in 16 years.

    --
    "Voices In My Head" The Unauthorized Biography
  130. Duhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rar files with PAR on several dvds for redundant recovery. Format is irrelevant, there will always be an enthusiast community supporting old things. It's the reason we have c64 music files floating around on the net to this day and multiple ways of playing them.

  131. 9-Track Tape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    9-Track Tape at 1600 bpi. I figure the NASA museum will still be around with a 9-Track tape drive or seven in working condition!

  132. Easy by MrVictor · · Score: 1

    Buy the newest, most expensive removable media technology from Iomega.

  133. Print it ... by garry_g · · Score: 1

    ... and with it, I mean the Torrent-URL, as well as a password you encrypt the data with, then post it up on several Torrent-Trackers under appropriate names (like "Angelina Jolie naked.avi" etc.) ... it'll most likely still be around for downloading in 17 years ...

  134. Re:If you can't remember that far back, wikipedia by argent · · Score: 1

    How much do you want to bet that I can produce an 8-track player within 24 non-weekend hours?

    I think you meant "can't".

    I also think you missed the point of my message, or you should have been responding to the parent article instead of mine.

    But just to close the loop, I suspect it would take me more than 24 hours to find a decent thrift store in this town, let alone a flea market. The last thrift store I was in they were in the process of throwing out every electronic device older than about a decade.

  135. CD-RW is a good middle ground for archives by snowwrestler · · Score: 1

    CD-RW is more archival than CD-R because it uses re-meltable metal instead of dye to hold the data. It's a good middle ground in terms of archival quality, and should last 16 years in dark cool storage pretty easily.

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:CD-RW is a good middle ground for archives by Dgtl_+_Phoenix · · Score: 1

      CD-RW can last 30 years, assuming pretty ideal conditions (and even up to 100 if you believe some of the ratings). Cool dark place is pretty much exactly what the doctor ordered. Pressed CDs can last quite a bit longer. 50+ years should be no problem. Likewise, I think that it's pretty likely there will still be disk players that are backward compatible with CD/DVD. Either way, an external drive that should be backwards compatible with USB descendants should at least let you hedge your bets. That way you're using two very main stream technology staples of the moment and not just one.

  136. Add the player by seebach · · Score: 1

    I would not only buy the media, but the computer as well. If you buy a cheap netbook, then you're sure she will have something to view the media on. And if it has SSD disk it will work in 16 years+. Have all the relatives store the stuff on usb disk and then pack it all air sealed.

  137. Wrong age by demonlapin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Having read the bulk of the responses, and having been 17 ... seventeen years ago, I want to offer a tangential point:

    Don't give it to her when she's 17. It will mean very little to her then. Give it to her at the birth of her first child.

  138. Another idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would suggest that not doing a time capsule but instead invest some time and energy into having a relationship with your child. As your friends/relatives do things with your child have them make entries into a diary shared with your child. (Also encourage your child to make entries).

    In the long run it's not so much what we have but who we share it with...

    God's speed to you and yours.

  139. Long term CD by foniksonik · · Score: 1

    As in Certificate of Deposit. Get one with a 17 year maturity date for about $1000 or whatever the minimum is. She will thank you with tears in her eyes when she finds out she can get that car or prom dress she was wanting (or if she's smart it will pay for college when her parents are broke from the 18 year financial cycle).

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    1. Re:Long term CD by toddestan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wow, she'll have around $2000 then. In 2025 dollars. While I'm sure she won't be complaining about free money, it's not like it's going to be a heck of a lot of money.

      If you want to get something along the lines of a long term investment, I would recommend an ounce of gold. Perhaps get a bullion coin like an American Eagle or Canadian Maple minted in the current year. One will run you a bit less than $1000 currently. I would expect it will appreciate better than the CD will. Or at the very least it will be a pretty physical object to find in the time capsule in 16 years.

  140. The Apocalypse is Nigh! by rhp997 · · Score: 1

    Since the rest of your family is going digital, you should consider something timeless - such as an MRE and a Colt 1911 with a box of ammo.

  141. What about a book? by Nekosudachi · · Score: 1

    maybe a book with photographs and plain text.

  142. storage by confused+one · · Score: 1

    lots of people are correctly telling you that the media might not be readable in 17 years, either because it degraded or you simply can't find a drive to read it. Here's my suggestion: Get an Ipod. Take out the battery and replace it with an external battery pack that uses AAA or AA batteries. Store everything on it (which should nicely verify your mod works). Take out the batteries. Put the iPod with empty battery pack into a ziplock bag with some dessicant. Wrap that in a second and third ziplock (redundant seals). Heat sealed bags would be better than Ziplock, if you can do it. Place this in your "time capsule". For redundancy, throw in paper copies of the most important text(s) and photos, similarly protected. Seal it. There's a fair chance that the iPod will work in 20 years; but, there's no guarantee....

  143. Use the web by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

    Register a URL specifically for her, and think up a login and password for it. Place the URL and login info on a sheet of paper placed in the capsule. Create a trust of 3 people to maintain the domain registration and to keep a copy of all the files stored and backed up. Once she turns 16, sign up for hosting somewhere, and set up a login page which gives her access to all the digital files. At this time you can convert the files to the format-of-the-day if needed.

    If you do this, it should be secondary content. The main content of the capsule should be physical items and handwritten words.

  144. Why just one medium? by houghi · · Score: 1

    Just use multiple ways. CD/DVD/BlueRay and a USB stick.

    However making a book will be the nicest thing to get. Even for a geek. Or a box or something they can at least hold and is not digital.

    Put a newspaper and a magazine in that box. Those will get a giggle when reading after 17 years. Not more then two. For the rest there are other means to get the information if you want it then.

    Also a range of other items that you find important at this time. I would not go with photos as they can be shown much earlier as well. If you really want something technical in there, put in a used cellphone in there. It might not work anymore, but it will certainly be amazing to see a 17 year old cellphone. I would LOVE to be able to show an old Nokia now.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  145. Anti-Aging by homes32 · · Score: 1

    don't forget to suck out all the air and replace it with Argon. it will keep the items inside from showing physical signs of age and will keep out condensation.

  146. $20 Best Buy Gift Certificate by neo · · Score: 1

    This is your best bet because it will show you cared... at some point in the past. You don't even need to put any money on it, just grab an empty one from Best Buy next to the counter. They leave them out there for just this kind of gift.

  147. Online hosting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could you not just use an online storage solution? They will do their best to prevent the data becoming corrupted while hardware evolves. You can choose to reformat anything that absolutely has to be reformatted as you please. You'll just have to keep up the payments and hand over the username and password when the birthday comes around.

  148. Put a car in there. by neo · · Score: 1

    It will practically be a classic and she'll be legal to drive.

  149. Re:If you can't remember that far back, wikipedia by Sprouticus · · Score: 1

    Luckily you dont have to go to a thrift store for an 8 track player http://shop.ebay.com/?_from=R40&_trksid=p3907.m38.l1313&_nkw=8+track+player&_sacat=See-All-Categories that took 20 seconds. Also, 8 tracks were popular when I was a child, in the early-late 70's. Thats 30 years, not 16. In 17 years a DVD player or blu Ray will be fine. Get some archival quality discs and go to town.

  150. Big Rack by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

    I don't care if they are big or small, as long as they are "original equipment". I don't like after market modifications.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  151. Re:If you can't remember that far back, wikipedia by argent · · Score: 1

    Why are you telling me this, it's this article that claimed 8-tracks would be hard to find.

  152. which of my storage media survived by ei4anb · · Score: 1
    When I look at my personal store of data I realise that quite a lot is now unreadable from the original media.

    I have some programs on punched cards that have survived from 1975. The printouts of those programs is faded but still readable.

    I can still read (some of) my 8" floppies from 1978 the 5.25" floppies from 1984 and the 3.5" diskettes and I have copied the data onto my current PC (which is backed up on several different media). Many of those floppies had read errors after a decade of storage and the only way the data survived was because it had been copied onto newer media.

    My e-mail from 1988-96 is archived on 9-track tape in an IBM format and while I do have source code to read on Linux alas I do not have access to a 9-track tape drive.

    The colour photographs from the 70s have faded but my great-grandmothers monochrome silver halide photos from the 20s are still in perfect condition.

    I suggest putting some photos in the capsule. Choose the oldest photo of a common ancestor, scan it into your PC (with offsite backup) and put the original in the time capsule (well sealed).

  153. What's wrong with an 8 Track? by kthejoker · · Score: 1

    If, when I was one year old (1983), my uncle had put an 8 track in a time capsule that I could open in 1999 ....

    I could have easily played it, since my dad still had his 8 track player. If he hadn't, I could have easily bought one at a flea market, or on that fledgling eBay service, or through a hobbyist magazine - maybe even at a secondhand music store.

    I can't think of a single digital format from the past 20 years that is truly in every sense of the word "obsolete" and therefore unretrievable. They may be archaic, you may have to hunt a bit more with some technologies than others to get a working reader, call up some universities, some digital museums, libraries, hobbyist friends, but it can be done.

    Even if it can't be done, the schematics for building a reader are out there somewhere. Things are still just made out of elements, aren't they?

    16 years is a while, it's not THAT long.

  154. Gold CD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use a gold CD (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_CD); save any audio in linear PCM (.wav), and pictures as .bmp. The audiovisual industries will always be in need of uncompressed, free intermediary formats, which is why support for these won't be dropped for decades, if ever. Save any text in .txt, if reasonable, if not, I don't see .pdf support dropping anytime soon. Just to be safe, save installers for Adobe Reader for all the major operating systems on the disc. Video is more tricky, but since most modern players support MPEG1, now 16 years old, you can bet that H.264 support will be available sixteen years from now.

  155. A netbook with two spare drives with mirrors of.. by CKW · · Score: 1

    A netbook with two spare drives containing mirrors of the main drive. Make sure it's not flash memory hdd. Remove the battery. Include only the wall wart. Make sure it functions with the battery removed and wall wart attached. (ask sales droid to demonstrate). Maybe even remove the onboard clock battery, and leave behind a photo/details of it. Just to be sure it doesn't leak and damage the motherboard.

    Choose a netbook/device you think might have antique value in 20 years, and it might even turn out to be an investment to boot. Keep one of the two spare drives at a seperate physical location from where the netbook is stored. Safety deposit box would be good.

    Slightly off topic, but speaking of safety deposit boxes -- VERY IMPORTANT -- you are NOT allowed access to a SD Box PRIOR to a will be probated unless you a) have the key ***AND*** you are on the list of people allowed to access the SD Box!!! So whether you found the key or not, if you're not on the access list and the will is in the SD Box, guess what?

    No will for probate. You're fuxxored. ps: get a god damned will!! I'm shocked at how many people with kids don't have a will. Write one out in your own handwriting, a full page of paper. Doesn't even need a witness if it's completely in your handwriting. Do it now. Takes 15 minutes.

    Hmmmm.

    (( CKW goes to the next office over for 15 minutes with a writing pad ... ))

  156. Re:a slither? don't you mean a sliver? by FormOfActionBanana · · Score: 1

    How old is Linker3000? Further, what is his native language and how sophisticated is your lexicon/grammar in that language?

    --
    Take off every 'sig' !!
  157. Don't gamble, win at this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    these days, laptops are cheap, if you want to do this, do it right. install all of the players, media etc on a new laptop, REMOVE THE BATTERY, make sure to include the ac adapter and you're set. Your only real concern here is that the battery might leak after time, it will become useless so maybe just don't include it. I've fired up plenty of laptops from the mid 90's, as long as they were kept in a clean place and didn't get banged around, they were fine.

    DO NOT TRUST OPTICAL MEDIA. I've had both dvdr's and cdr's fail crc within 2 years. I've had DOZENS of them fail within 4 years. Hard drives are great, assuming you have a controller and a bus to plug into. Let's see somebody get an mfm drive with an ISA controller working on their dell gaming rig.

  158. A decade? by Digital_Quartz · · Score: 1

    [quote]I still am quite happy with almost a decade old machines[/quote]

    Really? A decade? That's sub-1Ghz. That's two years prior to the release of Windows XP. What modern software are you going to run on a machine that old? At least DirectX was out then, so there exists some software from that era that will run on modern computers (although likely not Vista).

    1. Re:A decade? by ghqman · · Score: 1

      My current desktop machine that I do development on is more than 9 years old, sub-1 GHz. I've upgraded the OS to XP at some point, and it runs just fine. The only thing I've noticed being slow are some flash movies.

    2. Re:A decade? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      OSS? I run a LAMP server on an old 800Mhz Celeron. My BSD router is a 600Mhz P3 and is pretty much gross overkill for what it does. The two biggest problems I have with using older computers really isn't the CPU speed, it's either the memory limit (many will only accept 512MB), and the fact that they have been outclassed in the free hardware department by P4-class stuff.

    3. Re:A decade? by arcade · · Score: 1

      Afraid I haven't used a Microsoft operating system for more than 10 years, and my linux boxen chugs quite nicely along with an old processor, thank you very much. :)

      --
      "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
  159. Easy.. by FatherOfONe · · Score: 1

    Buy her a Zune. Nobody uses them now and nobody will 16 years from now either.

    This seems like a way for the parents to "get" some cool modern tech that they can use for the next few years and then "store" it for her 16th birthday.

    --
    The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
  160. NOT Bluray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except that you have it backwards. CD is going to last as long or longer than DVD (though those two will probably be killed at the same time), and DVD is going to last longer than Bluray.

    If you're going to do computer files on fixed media, CD is your best shot. DVD is nearly as good.

    The problem with Bluray is that it still isn't really cracked (Slysoft doesn't count), so not many people are buying players and drives yet. And that means there isn't a big market of content discs yet, which further discourages the market for drives. I know back-compatible drives for CDs will be around in 20 years, but Bluray could be gone in 5. The industry just hasn't committed yet to Bluray or backward compatibility with Bluray yet, and won't do so, until the movies become playable. It can still end up in the same shape as HDDVD.

  161. Just a thought: stick on standards by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

    This summer, I went though some of my old floppies in a daring search for the shitty pen-and-paper RPG system I made when I was in the school, back around 1992-1993 (so here's your 17-year window). And surprise surprise, I found it! The files were in rather weird formats, though - but almost all file types I could open in current crop of software. (The vector graphics files had fared worst: I suppose the Arts & Letters Composer install disks are somewhere in the pile, but I doubt a Win16 application will work that well in recent Windows versions...) The new software doesn't preserve the formatting, though.

    Yet, the best-preserved version of this shitty pen-and-paper RPG system is... (drum roll)... the one I printed on the dot-matrix printer. Surprise, surprise. Easily readable, perfect formatting, and even the made-in-two-minutes vector art is there right among my incomprehensible combat rules.

    So go for printed format. These days, printing high-quality documents is easier and cheaper than back in 1992. As for computer-readable stuff, stick to standard formats. Every software package, codec or file format that is even slightly obscure these days and completely proprietary is going to cause problems. Speaking of the same bunch of floppies I went through to find this RPG, I honestly thought Microsoft Works and Windows 3.x Write files would be readable in future. "But it's made by Microsoft!" ...took until OpenOffice.org 3 to get support for Works files and Write is still unsupported. I suppose MS products still read them in one form or other. *sigh*

  162. Another vote for analog by jm113 · · Score: 1

    Let me add my voice to those who've suggested paper/print as the medium of choice for this type of project. I teach digital preservation at a library school, and one of the key points we make to students is that while it is possible to preserve digital information in the long term, doing so requires a much more active curation of the information than is necessary with traditional printed material. You can leave a book on the shelf for 15 years and come back and reasonably expect to find the book in usable condition. You can't make that assumption with digital information. Format, software and hardware obsolescence all conspire to make digital information unreadable unless someone is actively working to combat them. Time capsules guarantee that you can't engage in the necessary curation of the data. If I was going to try to do a time capsule approach anyway, I'd probably say get a cheap laptop and put all of the data and software necessary to view it on there, seal it up in a ziploc bag with a packet of desiccant, and pray that the thing boots up after 16 years. That way, you only have to worry about the hardware dying. If it lives, you'll have a complete environment for examining the data.

  163. It's the protocols by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd advocate a redundant media - one small USB drive, a separate flash, maybe some extra of both and/or a third type. Encode the files with redundancy:

    http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/08/03/197254

    The *BEST* thing you could do is include a small NAS, like this:

    http://www.addonics.com/products/nas/nasu2.asp

    Media changes, but the file transfer protocols will still be around. Include instructions for use.

  164. Not to point out the obvious... by lymond01 · · Score: 1

    But if you're going to have a digital time capsule, why bury it? Why not just keep it in some password protected online file storage. Keep an eye on the company -- if they are going under, move the data to another online file storage company. When the person opens the physical time capsule, have inside it the URL and password of the online site. If you're burying said time capsule, that might be a bit tricky (since online companies come and go) but perhaps you can designate someone as caretaker and provide a name, relation, and current phone number (at the time) of that person in the capsule.

    1. Re:Not to point out the obvious... by johanwanderer · · Score: 1

      Just make sure they have a decent back-up solution :)

      I personally would pick something like JournalSpace

  165. Go all the way... by Asadullah+Ahmad · · Score: 1

    How about store the files on a Netbook or even a low-end Laptop, with backups on DVD including a live Linux distro. That way you only have to worry about electricity being available in 20 years, which is a safe bet as far as I see it. Though the this won't be so much as a time "capsule" than a bag, and will be heavy on the pocket too.

  166. Re:a slither? don't you mean a sliver? by thenumberofthebeast · · Score: 1, Troll

    Pet peeve of *mind*???

  167. Laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CD's an Flash Memory will probably degrade, old external hard drives may not work with "Windows Home Ultimate Complete Multi-Media Red Edition 12 SP3" or "Unbutu Zesty Zebra" so why not just get a cheap laptop or netbook? You have everything needed to read the media, and it will most likely still work if it hasn't been on and exposed to Malware for 17 years.

  168. Update it. by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    Have two compartments in the time capsule. One is sealed, and the other has a slot or a door so you can add updates. Keep a copy of the digital files, and regularly write them to a recent media format. Actually, the time capsule should be in a safety deposit box, so all you really need are two Kevlar envelopes. Tape shut the primary capsule and leave the one with the digital updates unsealed. A month before her birthday buy a fireproof box of suitable size, transfer the envelopes into it, and seal it shut with colorful tape. Label the box to not open it before the target date. Let that box sit in plain view so she can build the memory of the gift and anticipate the opening. After the opening explain why there are ten odd objects, and that actually armed guards and sixteen inches of steel were protecting the gift. Oh.. 16 years... OK, not armed guards. Guards in powered armor with trafalgars.

  169. Kickin' it Old School by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    To date, I believe cuneiform tablets have best stood the test of time, as far as a data storage media which does not quickly become obsolete.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  170. Redundantly - its cheap enough, so why not? by shyamrox · · Score: 1

    Depnding on the amount of data you are storing, I'd store it redundantly: - CD (if it can hold it) - DVD - HD - Flash media....(maybe it will last longer than 10 years, who knows?) - an IPOD? Lets face it, in 16 years, Ipods will likely still be around. :)

    --
    I SURVIVED THE GREAT SLASHDOT BLACKOUT OF 2002!
  171. Self-contained hardware by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

    Use something self-contained, like an iPod Touch or one of those digital picture frames. Or if you don't want to spill for some new device like that, get something that's already old.

    I've got a laptop from around '96 or so sitting in a drawer. It's practically worthless. It has a 3.5" drive but no CD drive or ethernet port. But if I wanted to, I could still plug it in to an outlet and look at whatever stuff is on it, no matter what "modern" technology can and cannot read.

    Store in a cool, dry location.

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  172. digital time capsule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    make the whole thing digital, bury it on a server and give her the password when she turns 17th

  173. Use a netbook computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use a netbook computer and put all your files in it.

    Even better get two netbooks and put the files in both of them in case one of them fails.

  174. Online is probably best. by Exception+Duck · · Score: 1

    Create a gmail account, tell your family to mail the things there.

    Bury the login, password.

  175. Cheap Netbook + Pelican Case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get all the family members to chip in for a cheap netbook with a magnetic hard drive in it. Asus's ubiquitous Eee PC (http://eeepc.asus.com/global/product904hd.html?n=0) might be a good choice. Then seal it up in one of those water/dust/apocalypse-proof Pelican cases. My company ships hard drives and laptops with those cases every day of the year. Not one has ever been damaged in a Pelican case. Anyways, you won't have to worry about software to read arcane formats or outmoded filesystems or incompatible hardware because it would be a single self-contained semiconductor-laden time capsule. Assuming that the wall jacks in your country haven't changed in 20 years then it should be fine :)

  176. Bury the media and the media player by denn1s · · Score: 1

    You can bury any medium and a way to play it aswell, lets say, a cd and a disk man, as for music goes, or maybe magnetic tape and bet that some company will still have ways to read it, since its useful for backups. Depending on your budget there is a bunch of stuff you could bury to play the media you bury, or go for a top tech of nowodays wich should be partially old 10 years in the future,,,

  177. I wouldn't worry about her 17th Birthday... by macbeth66 · · Score: 1

    12/21/12 is only 1213 days, 18 hours away.

  178. Re:With the cut price components used these days.. by mrdoogee · · Score: 1

    Doc: Well here's the problem right here... "Made in Japan!" Marty: What do ya mean Doc? All the best stuffs made in Japan! Doc: Great Scott!

  179. MPEG and flash by ^_^x · · Score: 1

    If you only have one media, I'd suggest a USB flashdrive formatted in FAT16 or FAT32, containing TXT, MP3, MPG, and M4V formats as they're all pretty well established standards.
    It's hard to say if something can physically read USB in 16 years, but it was possible 10 years ago, and it's super abundant and well established now.

    About a decade ago I started archiving stuff for long-term on ISO9660 CD-Rs in VCD format, and now it's hard to find anything that couldn't view them. Widespread MPEG standards seem to fare quite well - especially now that even set-top players can play them.

    SD cards and the like will be obsolesced over time by smaller cards and different standards, but the basic USB flashdrive seems quite ingrained in every computer of decent power running any OS.

  180. throw a whole computer in there by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    on of them mini netbooks. That way, you don't have to worry about the hardware becoming incompatible. (The battery won't survive, but at least it should run with the AC plug connected.)

  181. Just put it on a netbook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just buy a netbook and put your data on that....you should stillbe able to plug it in and run that in 16 years

  182. Paper! by Animal+Farm+Pig · · Score: 1

    By paper, I mean punch cards.

  183. alternatively by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just put a hundred dollars in a stock market index tracker. In 16 years she can have fun seeing how much it has risen and maybe even buy a second hand car/scooter/flying electric saucer. Seriously.

  184. Re:If you can't remember that far back, wikipedia by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 1

    I've got two in my basement. They're available if you really want one.

    --
    Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
  185. Include a laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Buy yourself a cheap laptop, (reformat it to get rid of the crapware, install VLC etc etc)
    2. Load all of that data onto an external usb HD (one with platters, not a flash drive) *and* the internal drive.
    3. Seal it up with the power adapter.
    4. ????
    5. Profit

  186. Passive components? by mgessner · · Score: 1

    How about a box of resistors, capacitors, inductors and memristors?

    --
    "Sometimes the truth is stupid." - Lawrence, creator of Prime Intellect
  187. Yu haven't really tried to hook it up by geekoid · · Score: 1

    what are you talking about?

    http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=1219598&CatId=76

    In fact, there sin';t any format used in the last 17 years that I can't get at.

    As much as people on /. like to think technology progress and changes at a phenomenal rate, that's not really true. What happens is core technology gets faster and bigger, but the core technology is still around. Or someone makes a tool to link modern technology with fading technology.

    DVD in 17 years will still be usable, from a technology standpoint. from an aging standpoint, maybe not. Unless it is sealed well.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  188. Domesday Book by Dareth · · Score: 1

    How about a hard copy of one of the best preserved "time capsules" from the past?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domesday_Book

    Just watch the recursion.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  189. Keep It Simple Stupid by SoVi3t · · Score: 1

    Buy a crappy laptop or whatever off Ebay, and then install whatever programs you feel would be needed (something to read documents, something to play mp3s, something to play movies, etc etc etc), then put it in there with some dvds and cds full of whatever it is you need. I still agree with aforementioned comments that a time capsule should contain other physical objects though. Newspapers, magazines, trading cards, toys....things that may be worth something in the future (oil).

    --
    Defender of Microsoft and Communism!!!
  190. USB and the test of time... by Falcon4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    USB isn't going anywhere fast, and even 16 years from now, the hardware will still be plentiful enough to ensure it's still readily available. The form factor may change, but the fact that everyone has a USB device of some kind (all with the same computer-side "A" connector) would ensure that even 16 years later, they'll still be on the front of at least some computers. USB has already lasted over 10 years in its current form... ;)

    So that's a starting point. I'd say get yourself a high quality (read: lower capacity; look for a "single-level cell") USB Flash drive. Flash chips are used on all PC motherboards, even on the oldest (>10 year old) ones and they still work fine, so I don't think there'd be an issue with it losing its data over time. Try looking for a Flash drive with low capacity that claims high-speeds (the signs of SLC Flash), but stay away from cheap Chinese ripoff junk.

    MP3 and JPEG have both stood the test of time - once again, they're both standards that are well over 10 years old (I think over 15, even). Your music and pictures would be safe with them. And, of course, TXT files are just plain ASCII data with no formatting, the de facto standard for storing any plain readable information on a digital system.

    Or... you can just toss a netbook in there, new in box. It might just be as good as opening a brand-new-in-box Apple IIc. That would definitely be a cool gift, as long as she understands the value of nostalgia and doesn't just think "gee, what a piece of junk, thanks". :P

  191. Proper Environment is Critical by fast+turtle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First off, you need to know what you're placing in the container to determine how big it needs to be. The next is to ensure that you have multiple packs of Silica Desicent to handle any extra moisture (corrosion reduction). In regards to the container itself, it needs to be waterproof and possibly air tight but not gas proof as you'll eventually need to purge all Oxygen from the container using Inert Dry Nitrogen. Then simply don't open it until the designated time (birthday gift is a great idea). Another way of introducing Dry Nitrogen into the case is the use of Liquid Nitrogen and allowing it to evaporate. The advantage is it will drive all of the oxygen out of the case and ensure a very slight overpressure, which helps keep moisture from entering.

    --
    Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
  192. Simple. by Nekomusume · · Score: 1

    Include the required hardware. A dirt cheap netbook, for example.

  193. I know jsut the thing by geekoid · · Score: 1

    sign her up on several current sites, and then put the user name and password in the vault.
    Imagine, in 17 years from now, she could have the pretty impressive slashdot user ID!

    Also, toss a couple of shares of MS, IBM and Disney. wth.

    On the down side, you might need to make a script that logs into those account once a year or so.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  194. How about.. by Nuclear.Wolf · · Score: 0

    Create an email address for your niece, Put the digital data into an archive format, then email the data from your niece's email account to your niece's email account. I used to do it at college to backup my work when i forgot my usb stick. 2 years on the data is still there.

  195. redundant systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Encapsulate the entire system needed. Why place one full computer when you can place two in the capsule for twice the price. Or for a real bargain (added redundancy) do in triples.

  196. Store it in the Google cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and let the cloud worry about maintaining it.

  197. The future is much further away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see this same issue come up all the time. The problem with it is that it seems people are way too optimistic about how fast our technology will develop from this point forward. Sixteen years is really not a very long time. As long as you stick with some basic formats (text, jpg, gif, mp3, etc.), I can guarantee you'll have no problem reading those at that time. In fact, I would even be willing to bet that nobody reading this will die before any of the ones I just mentioned would be unreadable with little trouble. It's the "flying car" way of thinking about the future...people thought we'd have those already, and we are nowhere near having them flying around everywhere, if ever in the next 500 years. I think Ray Kurzweil is way off with his future predictions. Maybe multiply his by ten, and you may be closer. Don't even worry about whether you can read a file in sixteen years. You might as well worry about whether people will be around in sixteen years instead.

  198. Your choices are simple. by TheMCP · · Score: 1

    There are two ways this can be dealt with.

    1) Somebody could do maintenance work on the "time capsule" contents for the next 16 years. This would involve occasionally moving the digital files to fresh media and converting files from obsolete formats to current ones.

    2) The time capsule could contain the entire computer setup required to view all the enclosed media.

    There's really no other way around it.

  199. are tape drives such a bad idea? by e-scetic · · Score: 1

    Commodore 64's, Vic 20's and TRS80's are still functioning...tape drives intact. And what the heck was that gold plated disc they sent up with Vger, wherever it is? Oh, and stone tablets are still going pretty strong too.

  200. Netbook by zeeflogist · · Score: 1

    How about you put a netbook or old computer in the time capsule? That will be able to read anything you put in there, and it'll work in 16 years assuming power standards haven't changed.

  201. Sure, that was decent by Rix · · Score: 1

    But you're all out of Smokey Pete and his brains, so what now?

  202. Re:If you can't remember that far back, wikipedia by adolf · · Score: 1

    I found a stack of 8-track players at a store-closing sale at an old Radio Shack, all new in box, just a few years ago. They were still priced in 1980s dollars.

    I went back the next day to buy them, and (predictably) they were already gone.

  203. Why fight it? by LeadSongDog · · Score: 1

    Put the music up on archive.org and be done with it. It'll still be usable in a half dozen formats. Ditto software.

    --
    Oh, I'm sorry sir, I thought you were referring to me, Mr. Wensleydale.
  204. A url and login... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

    ...to a data store online? Keep everything on in some kind of torrent or google/amazon server space?

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  205. Re:With the cut price components used these days.. by Falconhell · · Score: 1

    If kept unpowered and cool capacitors should not be a problem. There was a period when large batches of faulty electros were made and used in motherboards, which lead to high failiure rates.

    That issue is largely resolved now.

    A more important issue may be the "Whisker growing" which occours in devices made from lead free solder.

    I have seen guitar amps with electrolytic capacitors more than 40 years old and still fine.

  206. You can store data on paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As printed shapes.
    http://www.arabnews.com/?page=4&section=0&article=88962&d=18&m=11&y=2006

    There were some Eastern European guys doing it as black and white patterns too, but I fail to find it now.

    You of course need Sagan's "Contact" style easy decoding instructions first.

    You could also use imprinted metal disks or carved stone.

    There will certainly be imaging hardware in the future, and the rest is just some simple image processing code, a smart 17 year old should be able to whip up some quick scripts. ;)

  207. Thats easy: Just photo copy your cock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cheap...

    Easy... (Enlarge 120% if desired)

    100% with future 'viewing standards'... (Until eyes become obsolete)

    Perfect for a girl's 16th birthday...

    And guaranteed to be talked about more then anything else in there!

  208. not that anyone will see this or care by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ironic how this story is almost 12 hours old and this comment is outdated but:

    Use an iPod and a plug. The interface is simple and electricity is pretty much the same as it was in 1920. Solid state drive and built in interface make it the clear winner (and I am not a mac fan, so take it as you will). Ps at least one person in her "time capsule celebration" group will know how to use it.

    --
    Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    1. Re:not that anyone will see this or care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ironic how this story is almost 12 hours old and this comment is outdated but:

      Use an iPod and a plug. The interface is simple and electricity is pretty much the same as it was in 1920. Solid state drive and built in interface make it the clear winner (and I am not a mac fan, so take it as you will). Ps at least one person in her "time capsule celebration" group will know how to use it.

      As others have mentioned above, the iPods with solid state drives are a bad idea. Flash memory relies on keeping a charge, and that charge slowly leaks. If the data isn't refreshed, in 17 years the hard drive will still work, but the data won't be there.

      They do make ipods with mechanical HD's though. More space to put stuff in and (surprisingly) way more reliable for long-term no-use storage.

  209. Whaddaya Know? by tengeta · · Score: 1

    Paper still has uses.

    --
    "They confiscated everything, even the stuff we didn't steal!"
  210. DVD by mjwx · · Score: 1

    Optical media will be quite safe, Properly stored it should easily last 20 years. In addition to this a working 15 yr old computer will be attainable, not commonplace but easy to get a hold of but I doubt it will be necessary as I'm certain there will still be a DVD reader available in 16 years. /pats USB floppy drive on desk

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  211. Include everything thats required to play back by Mr.Kwagga · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The USB 3 standard is being finalized, that should last quite a few years! I mean USB 2 must be almost 9 years old, and it will still last for another few years. USB 3 will be backwards compatible. The other option is to use a high quality archive level DVD/Blu-Ray. Verbatim makes a disc that's certified for Archive purposes, but its pricey. www.verbatim.com/optical/archival/ The netbook idea is nice, but I wonder if it will last, unless the time capsule is air sealed. Another thing to think about, is filesystems, if you use a Data DVD or flash disk, what's the chances the file system will be supported in 17 years? Rather get a Good quality Portable DVD player, or something like it, remove the battery. Make a few videos, record it onto the Archival DVD, and store it in a air-sealed container, make sure no moisture or insects can get the the container, metal containers are a good option.

  212. And a helmet by cemulli · · Score: 1

    I would say don't put in digital files, just because it won't mean as much as slightly age worn hand-written information.

    And in addition to all of the other suggestions above, make sure to include a helmet in the time capsule to protect her from all those pesky flying cars.

  213. rickroll her by cas2000 · · Score: 1

    you might have to wait 16 years for the cry of anguish, but it will be worth it.

    or save her some penis-enlargement spam so she can see that the internet way back in 2009 was exactly the same as the internet in 2025.

  214. There is no guaranteed way to keep data long term by msp3k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This question gets asked a lot. The answer is that there is no guaranteed way -- interfaces change so that your device may not even plug into anything in the future; motors in drives seize up and stop turning; file formats evolve so that there may not be software to read your data; bitrot erodes the data right out from under your nose... The best solution that anyone has come up with is to keep it spinning on a live computer, and migrate your data with you when you upgrade said computer hardware/software. If you want to put something in the capsule that's great, but make it a symbolic effort. If you /really/ want to make sure the data is readable in 16 years, then keep a copy on your computer and don't delete it. Storage capacities blossom larger and larger every year, so chances are you won't miss the drive space.

  215. Re:If you can't remember that far back, wikipedia by Sheepy · · Score: 1

    That said, I wouldn't want to be looking for a functional 5 1/4" floppy drive.

    I have one in my current computer, works fine in Windows XP.

  216. Only way to make sure is.... by jozmala · · Score: 1

    Put a small laptop inside of it, with every software required to run it inside the laptop. AND a bluray disk with all the software required to run and all the data for multiple operating systems in case the laptop fails and people still use bluray...

    --
    ©God :Copyright is exclusive right for creator to determine the use of his creation.
  217. Use Gold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    write your best wishes on a gold plaque

  218. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion