Slashdot Mirror


Getting Paid Fairly When Job Responsibilities Spiral?

greymond writes "I was originally hired as an Online Content Producer to write articles for a company website as well as start up the company's social media outlets on Facebook and Twitter. With budget cuts and layoffs I ended up also taking over the website facilitation for three of the company's websites (they let go of the current webmaster). During this time the company has been developing a new website and I was handed the role of pseudo project manager to make sure the developer stayed on course with the project's due date. Now that we're closer to launch the company has informed me that they don't have the budget or staff in place to set up the web server and have tasked me with setting up the LAMP and Zend App on an Amazon EC2 setup. While it's been years since I worked this much with Linux I'm picking it up and moving things along. Needless to say I want to ask for more money, as well as more resources (as well as a better title that fits my roles), but what is the best way to go about this? Of course my other thought is that I'd much rather go back to writing and working with marketing than getting back into IT."

495 comments

  1. The main issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In this economy, You are pretty replaceble, according to what you say your skills are. So you are behind the eightball.

    1. Re:The main issue by tsm_sf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He's basically stated that his company isn't willing to pay the going rate for the work he does. They could certainly fill his position, and they might get lucky with some bright kid fresh out of school, but if his boss is competent he'll know that anyone willing to take a cut in pay will also move on at the earliest opportunity. He's not going to get fired for asking for a raise unless there are large problems with the company or the employee.

      He could probably go for a minor raise, but the opportunity is ripe for picking up a few quality of life perks. Something that costs the company nothing, like a new job title, would be perfect. Maybe try to weasel some time to work from home or flex hours, or maybe just a new chair.

      Being able to point to a spreadsheet showing the increase in workload would be pretty handy.

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    2. Re:The main issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The going rate for what he does is what the company can get away paying someone to do the job. Look at the situation through the lens of game theory. You have one actor, the company, whose best interest is to keep their costs low and profits high -- one way of doing that is to lower overall personnel costs by having one person take over the responsibilities of three or four. On the other side you have the employee, who has described their case above. Currently the company is able to have a large win because the employee is 'cooperating' while the company is playing the role of a defector.

    3. Re:The main issue by XopherMV · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In this economy, You are pretty replaceble, according to what you say your skills are. So you are behind the eightball.

      That may have been true at the beginning of the year, but that's not the case any longer. Of the nine developers in my department, four have found new jobs within the past month. Another has threatened to leave and accepted a counter-offer to stay with the company. People are sick of the BS they received from management over the past year and are ready, willing, and able to jump ship now. Expect a lot of churn within companies over the next several months until this all settles down.

    4. Re:The main issue by Peach+Rings · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why people think that their personal experience and the experience of their friends is representative of the entire job market. "How good the job market is" (how do you even measure that anyway?) probably varies so much across a single state that individual data points are useless.

    5. Re:The main issue by CAIMLAS · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Replaceable, in what way?

      Sure, someone could fill his shoes. That's a possibility, but it's slim: there is usually a lot more to an IT job (whether it's developer or sysadmin) than just what the job requirements demonstrate.

      A professional position of any complexity has a non-trivial amount of daily tasks, procedures, and general business process which need to be understood before a person can fully and successfully "fill" the position. Sure, you might be a "Linux Administrator" or a "LAMP developer" but chances are the environment you're coming into is not identical to the one you're coming from: the administrator(s) and developer(s) did things differently. There will be varying degrees of documentation, thoroughness, stupidity, and so on.

      All that takes time to acclimate to and adjust for: it takes a lot longer if you're an idiot. Many environments can 'skate by' with an idiot at the helm for some time, but eventually it will catch up. Hiring someone who isn't an idiot will (typically) cost quite a bit of money (even in this economy).

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    6. Re:The main issue by Billly+Gates · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I just got out of a funny situation a week ago. I took a job as a manager that only paid 10/hr but the I.T. people were being paid 2.5x to 3x as much. It was very unprofessional and the owner mentioned my meager salary to the other works I would watch. Something sounded fishy. If this were 1999 I would have not taken the job and laughed at the guy. The owner of the computer shop was a terrible manager and he mentioned that I was not even an asset but a liability. I was very close in not accepting the job as the owner sounded snotty and indecisive, but I decided to take it because I had bills to pay. Looking back at it I have to say that we were both incompetent if this is what was agreed upon (being brutally honest). Same is true for anyone else or the slashdotter who submitted the story.

      In the end the computer shop barely made $400 in revenue for the week and after the 2nd I was let go. I was planning on doing door to door sales and doing at least *something* to bring in value. But it beat working at the grocery store since its the only place hiring and I need to pay off my student loans.

      In such a situation either management is bad or the employer is on life support. You need to leave or the decision will be made for you. If you do not have years of experience then your SOL and maybe store management is the next big thing to strive for after college. Many fortunate 1000 companies wont even talk to you unless you have years of experience and the college degree (or in my case I had one but 3 years out of I.T.).

      For the one who submitted this story I would say I.T. is too competitive. Shoot! Webmaster salaries and computer techs are 50% of what they were in 1999. I remember when webmasters were paid $65k a year and now its about $30k. Store management is the future if you have no experience or specialty besides a business degree and less than 3 years experience. You need many years of experience for anything today for medium to large businesses and globalization creates too many foreign cheap workers to compete against.

    7. Re:The main issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems the point was rather that the recession has frozen spending and caused a lot of "bullshit", which in turns means employees are less likely to stick things out. I imagine that sentiment is fairly universal regardless of the job market.

    8. Re:The main issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your argument seems to be that the employee is getting paid appropriately because that's what the company is paying him and he hasn't left yet. It's not a very useful analysis of the situation.

    9. Re:The main issue by forkazoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      He could probably go for a minor raise, but the opportunity is ripe for picking up a few quality of life perks. Something that costs the company nothing, like a new job title, would be perfect. Maybe try to weasel some time to work from home or flex hours, or maybe just a new chair.

      When I was last in the corporate world, we strictly acquired perks like nicer chairs and our own white boards via commando-style raids. We would actually have strategic planning meetings for the raids. The 8 pm Network Operations shift change was our standard time, and the 5th floor our standard target.

      That said, the OP will never get what he's worth at his current job. He deserves it. A great boss would give it to him, but it'll probably never happen. He's in the corporate equivalent of the "friend zone." His best hope for exploiting the situation is to get as much experience as possible, and the most inflated title possible, and try and use that as leverage when moving on to the next job.

      I was hired as a data entry grunt for my first job as a programmer. I got something like a token 50 cent an hour raise for the move because management valued me, and appreciated the fact that it turned out I was more skilled than they initially expected when I was hired for the grunt job. But, there was no way they were going to double my salary after I had already demonstrated I was willing to do higher level work for the entry level pay.

      So, in conclusion, it is a tactical error to do all the work you can without getting any of the money upfront; and the fifth floor will never muster adequate defenses to be able to repel (or even track) an elite squad of NOC monkeys.

    10. Re:The main issue by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 2, Informative

      "When I was last in the corporate world, we strictly acquired perks like nicer chairs and our own white boards via commando-style raids. We would actually have strategic planning meetings for the raids. The 8 pm Network Operations shift change was our standard time, and the 5th floor our standard target."

      In most of the companies I know, you'd be written up or fired within 8 hours of pulling such a stunt.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    11. Re:The main issue by tsm_sf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In most of the companies I know, you'd be written up or fired within 8 hours of pulling such a stunt.

      Weird. I could see a manager telling kids to settle down and put the shit back. I could also see the manager telling the boss that kids need to blow off steam when they work their asses off. Writing someone up or firing them seems more like an ego move than business sense, but then it seems like a lot of people want to be businessmen more than they want to do business.

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    12. Re:The main issue by Bling316 · · Score: 1

      Don't sell yourself short though, the succesfull new hire after weeks of filtration still must learn the intricasies of the company and get up to the efficiency you have achieved. The company is better off to grant your well earned compensation requesition than face the alternative. Don't be shy to remind them of this.

    13. Re:The main issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "He's basically stated that his company isn't willing to pay the going rate for the work he does."

      But that's the fundamental problem, is that actually true?

      We don't know his wage, but it does not sound like the skills required for his job are particularly uncommon. Regardless, I myself was in this situation recently, although my issue was not so much wideness of scope and skills required, simply that I had progressed my skillset and was working at a level well beyond my original remit.

      The only solution is to first figure out if you can get a higher paid job elsewhere with your skillset, if you can then you need to tell this to your boss, your HR department or whoever is the best bet at your workplace- it may be that you have a good relationship with a director you can raise it with. Your choice then is simply to play a game of brinksmanship with you telling them you intend to leave unless there is an improvement in your wage, it may be that they call your bluff then you simply must be willing to leave- after all, if you're heavily underpaid for your skillset what's holding you back? surely if what's said is true you can just find a better paid job elsewhere?

      This was my situation and for me it worked, I simply told them I intended to start looking for jobs elsewhere as I felt I was underpaid and got an $11,000 pay rise out of it. The point in my case that I knew full well I could get a job elsewhere for that wage, and I knew full well that I could do so extremely easily- in my case I simply did a job search on jobsearch.co.uk and monster.com and came up with over 50 matches all paying more than I was on at the time. It was hard for them to argue against it because they knew their only choice was to pay me closer to my worth, or end up paying even more again in recruitment costs and losing productivity to someone new on the job. Further, such a large amount of jobs seeking my skillset suggests it wouldn't take me more than a week or two to get such a job, even in this climate of 2.5 million unemployed in the UK. It's clearly a skillset that demands more pay and is greatly sought after, that there may even be a shortage of- effectively if I'm the seller, it's a sellers market, I can choose the price.

      So it really comes down to this- if you really are underpaid, if you really could be earning more elsewhere, then offer your company that choice, of either paying you what you're worth, or simply go elsewhere.

      I suspect anyone saying they're not paid what they're worth but not being willing to give such an ultimatum isn't actually as confident as they say they are in terms of being able to get paid as much as they think they're worth elsewhere. I suspect such a person is paid what they're worth, but simply wants more money for nothing.

      You're not going to get money for nothing though, if you have nothing to back up your assertion you deserve more pay, if you can be replaced tommorrow, then you either need to skill yourself up to a point where it's your market too, and you decide the wage, or you need to quit whining.

    14. Re:The main issue by Narpak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      [quote]He could probably go for a minor raise, but the opportunity is ripe for picking up a few quality of life perks.[/quote] What might be considered is asking for official courses in as many areas under his responsibility as possible. While it isn't as good as a raise, increased expertise and understanding would benefit the company, and at least having (recent) documentation that he really do know these things can only help when applying for future jobs.

    15. Re:The main issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You have one actor, the company, whose best interest is to keep their costs low and profits high -- one way of doing that is to lower overall personnel costs by having one person take over the responsibilities of three or four.

      Similarly, one way to keep costs low is to pay no more than minimum wage. Only the most shortsighted, irresponsible manager would consider either of these to be a viable strategy - especially for "knowledge" workers. If the employee is doing creative work, then his productivity depends on his knowledge of the workplace and the function of the company. To gain that knowledge takes training unique to the company, makes it expensive to replace individuals, and gives the company significant motive to retain its skilled workers. If his job doesn't require creativity or significant understanding of corporate function, then replace him with a shell script.

    16. Re:The main issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes there's nothing you can do about it. I'm in a similar position - hired at rate well above that of my peers, I am completing work at 2x or 3x the expected speed. The company has already announced that they won't have the budget to keep me next year (in front of the other contractors, no less). They offered to hire me on at a substantial pay cut and when I countered with a request for a raise, I was promptly shot down. They will try to replace me with a kid just out of school who will work for about half of what I make. I know it won't work, and middle management does too, but upper management has already made the call. Since I'm so far ahead of schedule, I'm able to play with new technologies constantly, and I won't let the door hit me in the butt on the way out...

    17. Re:The main issue by smchris · · Score: 2, Funny

      On moving on:

      "That's another way we recognize our best employees"

      -- Ever so sage Dilbert

    18. Re:The main issue by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In most of the companies I know, you'd be written up or fired within 8 hours of pulling such a stunt. Weird. I could see a manager telling kids to settle down and put the shit back. I could also see the manager telling the boss that kids need to blow off steam when they work their asses off. Writing someone up or firing them seems more like an ego move than business sense, but then it seems like a lot of people want to be businessmen more than they want to do business.

      The first time, sure. The second time, you have to put a stop to it. The only place I know of where you could get away with this was in the military; where it was "procuring through alternate channels the stuff you really needed to get the job done." Plus, you could hide it on the boat until you put to sea.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    19. Re:The main issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was my situation and for me it worked, I simply told them I intended to start looking for jobs elsewhere as I felt I was underpaid and got an $11,000 pay rise out of it.

      And in this economy... you may just as easily be shown the door. Or they'll quietly start training some other bright person in the organization. IT people are out there, with your same skillset, willing to work for whatever they can get, because they have bills and no job.

      Further, such a large amount of jobs seeking my skillset suggests it wouldn't take me more than a week or two to get such a job, even in this climate of 2.5 million unemployed in the UK.

      If you go completely based on skillset, I should've been able to find work in a week or two in my city, in my field, in the US. Recruiters (and HR people, but if you check, most job sites are full of recruiters) are inundated with resumes, and the good ones filter down to a small pile, and get interviews for people, and place a small fraction of those. Your resume (CV) is placed in the pile with everyone else who's already out of work who's not qualified for the job, everyone who has rewritten their resume to lie convincingly, and everyone who has your same skillset. If you're lucky, the recruiter can separate the last two groups from each other. If you're really lucky, you can get lumped into the last category, and filtered through the process. If you're filtered into the group, you'll probably get a phone interview, and .. from there, probably never hear from anyone again.

      That's been my experience, at least. I have 15 years of IT experience, time as a unix admin, as a windows admin, as an NMS admin. I've been in a job that has paid the bills for the last 6 months, and that took me 2 months to get. The job I'm leaving for took me 6 months of looking and interviewing and looking and interviewing.

      Friends of mine with similar experience levels are telling me the same thing. YMMV, of course, as each geographical area is different, but that's what the job outlook is in general, at least in the US.

      The OP should ask for whatever concessions he can get, and if he likes what he's doing, he should stay and get some perks. At the very least, flex hours or work from home. (Many companies are seeing non-financial benefits from flex time and people who work from home, as well as some financial perks, like lower absenteeism and lower power bills because there are fewer people in the building.)

    20. Re:The main issue by ImOnlySleeping · · Score: 3, Informative

      The company doesn't need to pay the going rate because this guy is doing it for less.

      --
      Everybody seems to think I'm lazy I don't mind, I think they're crazy
    21. Re:The main issue by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      it'll probably never happen

      Of course it's never going to happen. It's a fundamental rule of economics: you never get paid what you're worth when you work for The Man.

      Seriously, the only way workers have been paid what they're worth under capitalism is when they organize. There's a lot of trash-talking about union these days in the corporate media and with corporate politicians, but the fact is that the only time we've seen wages come anywhere near the true value of labor is when unions were the strongest.

      Do you know who gets paid what they're worth under our current capitalist system? Middle managers who can show their masters that they've cut workers' wages.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    22. Re:The main issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And he just talked about The Game Theory. Wait till he brings up The String Theory. You will be hiding!

    23. Re:The main issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop going the extra mile. Show up every day and do the work at 1x the expected speed until they let you go.

    24. Re:The main issue by DiverDanTV · · Score: 1

      As a CEO of a Major Corporation I can tell you when it comes to my staff asking for a raise. What I do is go on reliablilty first, time of completion of tasks, if it is a male or female: IE I have given raises and next thing I know she is preganant and that pisses me off, thirds thing is likeability: IE if I genuinely like the person. Other than that if you meett all those requirements I would ask for more money for your work..... Best of Luck

    25. Re:The main issue by ComputerGeek01 · · Score: 1

      These guys are right of course, the problem is with the economy and that your job skills landed you where you are. But if your company isn't growing at a rate that would afford you a raise this close to launch of a new product then get the F* out now! At least start networking or entertaining other options, mention the idea of changing jobs and possibley moving to your significant other and kids if they are old enough. Now is the time to prepare for plan B not when they tell you "Hey guys we're sorry, we took our shot and we missed" and if they say "Sure you can have a small raise" then you know that things will be ok for a little while longer no harm done.

    26. Re:The main issue by Nick+Ives · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But it's the only view that counts. The firm I work for advertises new vacancies at the lowest rate they think they can get away with and, if nobody shows up at that rate who fits the bill, they then advertise at a higher rate. This leads to all sorts of peculiarities like less experienced, new starters being paid more than old hands.

      The question, in the companies mind, is how can they get away with paying as low a rate as possible whilst keeping staff? Replacing old staff is expensive so it's best to avoid doing it, therefore the firm should pay people only so much as to stop them leaving.

      If the OP can generate the impression that he could leave easily and still be OK then that puts him in a much stronger position whilst talking about a pay rise.

      --
      Nick
    27. Re:The main issue by Kevin108 · · Score: 5, Funny

      From on of my favorite Dilbert strips:

      An employee is being interviewed by the manager. He asks, "How do you reward your best performing employees?"

      The manager replies, "We increase their workload until their performance becomes average."

      --

      It's a perfect time for being wasted.
      A perfect time to watch the stars.
      - Burden Brothers, "Beautiful Night"
    28. Re:The main issue by hal2814 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Seriously, the only way workers have been paid what they're worth under capitalism is when they organize."

      When I feel I'm being asked to work too much, not getting paid what I should, or just generally feel I'm being under-appreciated at work, I go right home and organize. I put together my resume and my contacts and start setting up a space on my laptop to track everywhere I've submitted resumes and which particular resume and cover letter I submitted. I also put notes on who I've talked to and the status of those talks. In about 3-4 months, I generally get exactly what I want. Once it took up to 6 months. And I'm not a terrible job hopper. In 10 years, I have worked for 4 companies(4 years, 1 year, 4 years, and 1 for my current employer). So you're absolutely right. There does come a time when a worker must organize and find a place where he (or she) can be appreciated for his (or her) talents. Oh, you mean unions? I guess you can if you want, but I get better results on my own.

    29. Re:The main issue by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I believe his argument is more like what happened to me:

      - You open your mouth and ask about getting paid for the overtime you're working (i.e. getting paid for the new tasks they keep piling on you)
      - They don't want to pay you, so they find an excuse to get rid of you (watching CNN while eating your lunch)
      - You get replaced by another guy who doesn't mind working 50 hours and only paid 40.
      - And then you end-up sitting at home.

      Just be happy you have a job. There are various ways you can "compensate" yourself for the increased workload, without pissing off the boss(es) by asking for a raise. Like taking full advantage of the free printers to run-off resumes and look for a new job.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    30. Re:The main issue by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 0
      The Socialist Wanker says "fight for the right to be exploited"*.

      If you are worth more, start your own company and pay yourself more.

      Otherwise: you are not worth it.

      * Graffiti seen outside the Job Centre in Lisson Grove, West London. "The Socialist Worker" is a communist newspaper with limited grip on reality.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    31. Re:The main issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The main issue is that the company you work for is going broke. So don't waste time asking for more. Eventually you'll lose your job anyway, as they will go bankrupt. So what you want is to make your resume look good. Get the fancy titles and job descriptions, pick up on the stuff you want to work at. And get ready for your next job as this one isn't going to be around for long.

    32. Re:The main issue by ectotherm · · Score: 1

      Three words: Become a consultant. Consultants get paid for every hour they work. If the client keeps loading up the work and responsibility, and pushes your weekly hours north of 60, so what?! You get paid for it! And if your client decides they don't want to burn too much budget on consulting fees, so what?! You work 40 hours and have an increased quality of life! I've spent half of my 20-year IT career as a consultant in one capacity or another, and have enjoyed 1.) getting paid for ALL of the work I do, 2.) the increased salary consultants get over a full-time employee, and 3.) the vast opportunities offered by working at myriad types of client. Having a diverse set of marketable job experiences WILL help you find work- contract or full time. And yes, if you work for a firm as a W2 employee, you CAN have both healthcare and 401k benefits. 1099 independent contractors make more $$, but are on their own for benefits. Albeit you have to be a bit more saavy with money to be a consultant, as in have 6-10 months of salary saved in case of lean times. But consulting sure as hell does help prevent you from getting "Lumbergh'd." Sure, I'll work Saturday if you need me to... Cha-ching! Work responsibilities piling up = license to print money. And remember, job security is soooooo 1980s. At least when you are a contractor you are more likely to know when the end is coming (end of contract). Layoffs are usually less predictable.

      --
      "Nature bats last..."
    33. Re:The main issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The complaintant has already mentioned several times that the company is, apparently, showrt of fund, so his moaning about being underpaid and requiring more staff would likely go nowhere.

      I'd drop the underpaid bit for the time being, and see if you can't find someone who's ... underutilized ... then point them out when asking for additional help. (Of course you'll need to be careful or you may just find yourself the next costcutting measure... Of course, that could happen once you get the website up an running as well anyways depending on how cash strapped they remain. )

      After that, you COULD start looking for a new job, but keep documenting any additional hours/etc. (beyond your 40) spent on the project, and use that as possible leverage for later on when/if the company has more cash or a lawsuit if you land another job elsewhere. The lawsuit is a possible option in some states(IANAL) as I had a friend, who, surprisingly, went through something similar many years ago and won a nice little settlement. (AFAIK though, this was MOSTLY for unpaid overitme. Enigneers are usually classed as not qualified for overtime pay(good companies compensate in some form either extra vacation time or money), which is, usually, abused by some companies.) If you're outside the US you may be SOL though.

    34. Re:The main issue by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 2, Informative

      What I do is go on reliablilty first, time of completion of tasks, if it is a male or female: IE I have given raises and next thing I know she is preganant and that pisses me off

      As a non-CEO of a non-Corporation I can tell you that you should have consulted your attorneys before admitting to that, and if you really think /. is anonymous...enjoy your golden parachute.

    35. Re:The main issue by physburn · · Score: 1
      Personally with work, I find its the would be having to work extra hours, unpaid overtime that would get me down. Our questioner has had to switch into a more technical role, which he's assumes should be better paid. That's moving up in the CV would, which would be a plus to me, now if he has to work longer hours, because of his extra responsibility that would suck. Its likely to take years for his extra responsibility to turn into extra pay, but at least it is moving upwards.

      ---

      Job Hunting Feed @ Feed Distiller

    36. Re:The main issue by Yert · · Score: 1

      As the President of a Non-Major consulting firm (and underpaid Systems Engineer for an IT shop), I think you're full of shit. After reading your journal, it's obvious you have very few, if any, employees; those you do have are already underpaid; and you can't hack your way out of a paper bag - and don't even know how to google ("derp, how do I set up a LAMP server? Ask Slashdot! derp!". Seriously, I've worked for guys like you before, but not for long - I leave as soon as I see what scumbags they are. Enjoy your massive turnover, and look in the mirror next time you wonder why Linux Admin #24 just no-call, no-showed on you.

      --
      Truck driver, plumber, Linux systems engineer.
    37. Re:The main issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And in this economy... you may just as easily be shown the door. Or they'll quietly start training some other bright person in the organization. IT people are out there, with your same skillset, willing to work for whatever they can get, because they have bills and no job."

      I'm guessing you didn't read my original post as I already covered this. As I mentioned there was over 50 jobs in my local area on just a quick search looking for my skillset, if it was easy to replace me then there wouldn't be so many companies crying out for them on such a high wage. If those people are out there why are these jobs not getting filled? Why did the company I work for except I needed a pay rise? precisely because I the cheapest option was to pay me what I'm worth, rather than risk losing months of productivity on a new member of staff, and having to pay them the same as I requested and employment costs on top.

      No offence, but you simply sound like one of those people who overstates his skillset. 15 years Windows/Unix/NMS experience isn't worth anything more than 3 - 5 years experience, as that's all it takes to become amazingly well versed in these subjects. You should be onto something more by now, and that probably stands out as the reason why you're struggling to stand out from the cry when job hunting- no one wants someone whose going to sit stagnantly on the same basic skills for that kind of time period. Unix/Windows/NMS admin is something I'd expect to see on someone's CV as an "also did" early on in their career towards the bottom of their CV, not someone's primary selling point.

    38. Re:The main issue by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Did you flash your gun at your boss during your salary negotiations?

    39. Re:The main issue by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just be happy you have a job. There are various ways you can "compensate" yourself for the increased workload, without pissing off the boss(es) by asking for a raise. Like taking full advantage of the free printers to run-off resumes and look for a new job.

      Employers just love the "be happy you have a job" attitude. But really, there's only so much compensation you can make up from the office supplies cabinet.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    40. Re:The main issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stealing chairs and equipment??? Be careful that you don't steal any special "medical" or "adaptive chairs or strap on pads, or you will have HR and FEDERAL agencies up your butt.

    41. Re:The main issue by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      In most of the companies I know, you'd be written up or fired within 8 hours of pulling such a stunt.

      Well, you don't tell them. If you do that, you're doing it wrong. "Written up". Whatever. This isn't junior high, or whatever you kids call it these days.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    42. Re:The main issue by teg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you never get paid what you're worth

      But what are you worth? There are multiple ways to look at this. One would be to simply look at "what would someone else be willing to do this for", either locally or globally. Another is "of what value is the work I do". Typically, the latter would be higher than the former - so the closer you can get your compensation to this level, the better off you are. This is one of the major reasons how brokers, executive-level management manage to get astronomical levels of compensation

      Unionizing is how grunts try to get some of the same treatment, to be paid what their work is worth to the employer rather than what they'd have to pay replacements. At some points in history, that has definitely brought society forward - while at other times, it has gotten stale and corrupted and has negative effects.

    43. Re:The main issue by w00tsauce · · Score: 1

      When you don't have a job you have a lot of time, time to follow statistics and data points.

    44. Re:The main issue by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Weird. I could see a manager telling kids to settle down and put the shit back.

      I can say I have seen both. Now this might be my personal anecdote, but anecdotal evidence is the best evidence on slashdot.

      I have worked at some fairly loose places that would have laughed such a thing off, as long as the "victims" if such an event were easygoing enough.

      I have also worked at places where they were looking to cut staff, so would fire people for petty stuff in order to avoid any possibility of a lawsuit. I, as most slashdotters would consider myself "to skilled to be fired", but there was a time when even I figured there were three choices.
      1. Stop pissing people off and become a model employee.
      2. Keep going and eventually they find someone to replace me.
      3. Find a new job and leave them completely surprised.

      Number 3 is always the most satisfying when you work at a place filled with bureaucratic asshats.

      Now it might be a timing thing, but my experience with the petty firings was during the dot-bomb era. Every company was looking to cut staff, and its best to get rid of people when you have a valid reason to do so.

      Even in the current economic hardhips now, I don't think it is as bad for IT as the cullings of a decade ago.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    45. Re:The main issue by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      No that stays in the car

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    46. Re:The main issue by The+Fanta+Menace · · Score: 1

      It is pointless to replace three or four employees with one employee, because that one employee would need to be paid for 120 or 160 hours of work per week, in order to achieve the same throughput as before. I can't see how that saves money at all.

      --
      -- Even if a god did exist, why the fsck should I worship it?
    47. Re:The main issue by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      As a CEO of a Major Corporation ... if it is a male or female: IE I have given raises and next thing I know she is preganant and that pisses me off

      You are either lying (this is most likely) or you're setting yourself up for a massive discrimination lawsuit. Have fun with that.

      Actually, you may be lying and setting yourself up, etc.; lying about being the "CEO of a Major Corporation" (why the capital M and C?) but telling the truth about running a company and discriminating on the basis of sex. In which case you're still liable for a massive lawsuit, but you don't have the deep pockets to absorb the damages. When you find yourself out on the street begging for spare change, remember exactly how you got there. And don't be surprised when your former employees walk by and laugh in your face.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    48. Re:The main issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that one employee would need to perform 120 or 160 man-hours of work per week for a single paycheck. You've never worked in corporate America, have you?

    49. Re:The main issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, as most slashdotters would consider myself "to skilled too be fired"

      Idiot.

    50. Re:The main issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know who gets paid what they're worth under our current capitalist system? Middle managers who can show their masters that they've cut workers' wages.

      And pretty much everyone who's self employed.

    51. Re:The main issue by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The company doesn't need to pay the going rate because this guy is doing it for less.

      The fact that he's willing to do it for X means X is the going rate.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    52. Re:The main issue by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      When you don't have a job you have a lot of time, time to follow statistics and data points.

      When you do have a job and you want out you don't have a lot less.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    53. Re:The main issue by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I'd say 25% of any job is knowing who to ask about specific things, so you'd be right - apart from one thing: by a strange coincidence the proportion of HR droids that don't operate by tick list is exactly 25% lower than that.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    54. Re:The main issue by shoehornjob · · Score: 1

      The firm I work for advertises new vacancies at the lowest rate they think they can get away with and, if nobody shows up at that rate who fits the bill, they then advertise at a higher rate.

      That kind of bottom line thinking is not very profitable or smart. Oh sure in the short term you can hire a bunch or workers real cheap. But in the long term you spend too much payroll having the more experienced workers fix the newbies mistakes. In general this could lead to a higher turn over rate as well.

      --
      "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
    55. Re:The main issue by shoehornjob · · Score: 1

      When I was last in the corporate world, we strictly acquired perks like nicer chairs and our own white boards via commando-style raids.

      LOL reminds me of the time I worked for Citibank. I was on the overnight shift and there were few people in the building so we regularly staged "midnight acquisition raids" on different areas of the building. He's right though, sometimes the only way to get your perks is to take matters in your own hands.

      --
      "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
    56. Re:The main issue by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yep, this has worked pretty well for me too.

      However, this strategy only works when there's many different employers to choose from. It's just like free-market theory: in a free market, buyers (or in this case, employers and employees) can pick and choose who they want to buy from out of a large field of sellers, and in theory, the crappy sellers (with excessive prices, poor quality, poor service, etc.) eventually go out of business. However, there are cases where the market is distorted: these are called "monopolies" (and cartels, oligopolies, etc.). That's when allowing the free market to work doesn't work, because there is no free market, there's only one seller of a partcular product/service, so government regulation becomes necessary.

      This has also been the case for some employers, where there was only one large employer in a town or city. In that case, simply switching jobs isn't an option for workers, because there's nowhere else to go.

      Luckily, this isn't the case much any more, now that "company towns" (where they even paid workers in "scrip" instead of money) are extinct, and extremely large city-dominating manufacturers are mostly gone.

      This is why I think one big and important role for government is to "bust up" large companies, and make it very difficult for companies to become too large, and if they do, regulate them heavily. Large corporations are the bane of free markets. It's not a "free market" if there's only one place to buy something from (especially if it's something necessary, like power, water, or communications), or if there's only 2 or 3 places and they're all colluding. In an ideal free market, there should be a large number of small companies, and that's it. This makes it much easier for buyers to find the best deal, and for employees likewise to find the best deal, and keeps competition high between the sellers/employers.

    57. Re:The main issue by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why did the company I work for except I needed a pay rise? precisely because I the cheapest option was to pay me what I'm worth, rather than risk losing months of productivity on a new member of staff, and having to pay them the same as I requested and employment costs on top.

      I don't know about companies in the UK, but over here in the USA, you're really screwing yourself by asking for a raise, because they usually WILL look for a way to get rid of you when it's convenient for them, because you've just shown yourself to be "disloyal".

      It absolutely does not matter that recruiting a new person and waiting for them to come up to speed will cost a lot more than just paying you market rate. You're thinking too rationally here. These companies are run by greedy, power-hungry sociopaths, and they'll shoot themselves in the foot if it means being able to screw over an employee they don't like. Why do you think so many of our companies are able to run themselves straight into the ground despite having good funding and talented employees?

      Over here, your best bet is to just interview for a new job, and take it. Don't try to get a raise. Companies DO NOT want to give out raises (except maybe 1%), that's just all there is to it. They want a workforce of pussies who will take whatever pay the company gives them, work 60-80 hours/week, come in on weekends, and never complain or go elsewhere. These companies probably think that if they fire enough "disloyal" employees who do look elsewhere, that they'll eventually have a stable population of "loyal" employees who never complain that their salary is 50% of market rate. It doesn't help that there's actually a substantial number of employees who really are like this (at least in my field, engineering).

    58. Re:The main issue by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Wrong. You're not looking at it from their point of view. The way they see it, it's better to bully him into doing all this extra work for peanut pay. This way, some VP looks good because they're "saving money", and gets a bonus. They don't care about the alternative, and won't until they're forced into it. Americans aren't far-sighted enough to understand this or care. And by the time this employee takes off, the VP will have already bought his daughter a new BMW 7-series with his bonus, so it's no skin off his nose.

    59. Re:The main issue by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm pretty sure he was joking, and he's not the CEO of any major corporation. He's just playing a stereotype, which is a very accurate one BTW. He could have done a little better with his post, however. He should have talked about how denying raises gives him a bigger bonus so he can buy a bigger yacht.

    60. Re:The main issue by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Agreed. If someone else is willing to damage their sanity by working too much for too little pay, by all means let them do it. It is the natural tendency of most bosses to push even long-standing employees to unreasonable extremes, but the converse is that if your skills are so diverse and valuable to the company, it means you can take those skills elsewhere with relative ease. Either they pay up, or you find someone who will.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    61. Re:The main issue by forkazoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      LOL reminds me of the time I worked for Citibank. I was on the overnight shift and there were few people in the building so we regularly staged "midnight acquisition raids" on different areas of the building. He's right though, sometimes the only way to get your perks is to take matters in your own hands.

      I was at a place that used to be part of Lehman Brothers. I guess well executed commando raids may be somewhat exclusive to the financial sector. I'm not sure how I feel about that, but it feels oddly correct.

      And, to all the people who think a person would be fired for it... You seem to misunderstand the nature of the commando raid. You don't wander around going, "Hey everybody, I got my new chair by taking it!!! Everybody come look!!!" Among other things, we would steal chairs from the 5th floor, and assign them randomly to people in rows near us to see if there was any response first. Once we had used unwilling patsies for the "training missions," we were able to establish the safety parameters. The overnight guys would then assign a nice chair to the cube next to them so that they could have a nice chair overnight, but them move it to the patsy's cube during the day when anybody might be around to look for it. Because we were moving slowly, I think most people assumed that the cleaning crew was occasionally getting chairs mixed up when they pulled them out of the cubes to vacuum. When a person from our group was going to be assigned a nice chair in a commando raid, they might be seen to leave a little early, so that if there was a new chair in their cube the next morning, everybody knew they had nothing to do with it. (And we had already deployed a handful of random nice chairs to people who knew that they weren't in on it, so they would have no reason to make any accusation.)

      Also, since we were one of the only groups that was in the office late, we got to be good friends with security, so we knew for sure that the only major intelligence resource in the building was sufficiently loyal to us.

      Like a third of the department was former military. We ran clean operations.

    62. Re:The main issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I can't tell if this is irony. Is this irony? Because any English speaker who knows the basics of their own fucking language would know that it's actually "too skilled to be fired."

      Idiot.

    63. Re:The main issue by Nerdposeur · · Score: 1

      "This leads to all sorts of peculiarities like less experienced, new starters being paid more than old hands."

      Which probably leads to the old hands leaving, disgruntled, which leads to wasting money hiring and training new people and losing the knowledge of the old ones. Maybe not such a great strategy after all?

    64. Re:The main issue by fractoid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even if you DO pay them for 160 hours a week, most people can't manage more than 40ish productive hours in a week over the long term, and even during crunch time, any hours past about 80-90 hours a week ends up being increasingly unproductive.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    65. Re:The main issue by fractoid · · Score: 1

      That said, the OP will never get what he's worth at his current job. He deserves it. A great boss would give it to him, but it'll probably never happen. He's in the corporate equivalent of the "friend zone." His best hope for exploiting the situation is to get as much experience as possible, and the most inflated title possible, and try and use that as leverage when moving on to the next job.

      That's brilliant!

      Some jobs and some companies are like that. You've worked there for a while, you're friends with the management, you like the company. When the company has hard times, you feel obliged to put in long hours, take on additional duties, maybe take a pay cut, all to help the company out. The thing is, companies like this have very little in the way of an available career path. You get paid somewhere near sorta what you're worth and you get your 4% pay raise per year, but you're not going to get big pay raises even if the scope of your actual duties grows far beyond what they're officially employing you for. The tend to see it as some kind of betrayal if you ask for more money, even if you're truly worth it. Once you outgrow your initial role, often the only way to continue advancing your career is to move jobs.

      Of course, there's an important flip side here. If you want to add to your skill set, it can be worth taking the pay hit and doing a stint at a company like this, because you'll be getting work experience in all sorts of fields. My last job, I was employed as a programmer but due to their inability to find a sysadmin, I ended up spending about five months as their ICT Coordinator running an Active Directory network.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    66. Re:The main issue by fractoid · · Score: 1

      This is why I think one big and important role for government is to "bust up" large companies, and make it very difficult for companies to become too large, and if they do, regulate them heavily. Large corporations are the bane of free markets. It's not a "free market" if there's only one place to buy something from (especially if it's something necessary, like power, water, or communications), or if there's only 2 or 3 places and they're all colluding.

      By their very nature, utility companies and public infrastructure companies have to be big. You can't be a small player if you're running an interstate rail network, or a city's power grid, or a municipal water supply. It makes much more sense for them to be run by the government, as non-profit organisations, rather than applying the usual free-market economics to them.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    67. Re:The main issue by fractoid · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why people think that their personal experience and the experience of their friends is representative of the entire job market. "How good the job market is" (how do you even measure that anyway?) probably varies so much across a single state that individual data points are useless.

      Well, since you want data and not anecdotes... I can't find the news article now but I read recently that in Australia, something like 70% of employees are looking for new work, up from about 30% a couple of years ago.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    68. Re:The main issue by jwhitener · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're living in an era that has already benefited from past labor union work. I assume you enjoy weekends and 8 hour days right? Thank unions.

      A business constantly pushes for more profit, and if left uncheck, say goodbye to weekends, 8 hour days, and good wages. Unions are the only source pushing back.

      Do unions sometimes make unreasonable requests and push back too hard? Of course. But without their existence, we'd be back to 10-12-14 hour days, no weekends, and slave wages.

    69. Re:The main issue by yoshscout · · Score: 1

      In the case they are talking about, you need 3 or 4 people working 10-15 hours a week. This is common in start-ups where everyone wears a lot of hats. As the company grows, those task go from 10 -> 15 -> 25 to full-time jobs.

    70. Re:The main issue by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Of course; it wouldn't be practical for utility and infrastructure companies to be small, but because of their importance and their monopoly status, they need to be heavily regulated.

      Companies which aren't heavily regulated, however, should IMO be kept small (i.e., less than 5000 employees, preferably less than 1000).

    71. Re:The main issue by ps2os2 · · Score: 0

      tsm: That is the major issue in most case "if the boss is competent" More and more people are getting promoted because they are at the top of their pay grade and it really does take a different person than a techie to be a manager. The problem is that when companies do that they shoot themselves in the foot and do so much harm to the poor staff that has to retrain a rookie that they get overburden with more work as the new boss cannot do the basics.

      Companies are just killing themselves doing this. IBM is a very good example of this. Over the last say 30 years IBM has dropped education discounts to schools, the results are that now there are are a shortage of people that will work with IBM software (except in foreign countries like India). IBM has brought in the pimply faced comp science kids and they have managed in 10 years to screw up IBM's flag ship product COBOL so bad they will never recover. You will see more and more companies deserting the mainframe as they cannot find talent because of the short sighted management people from 30+ years ago. The pimply faced comp science kids have had their hand directly into to the decline by sending poorly tested and bad code and not going by IBM's own packaging rules that it is a utter disgrace.

      I will not go into documentation that has gone down hill so badly it is is past disgraceful it is as bad as Microsoft's "documentation".

      IBM used to be the best in the world at hardware and software and now they are gasping for air in hopes to survive. Every 6 months you see big layoff's because management couldn't code their way out of a 1 instruction loop.

    72. Re:The main issue by DigitalKiwi · · Score: 1

      Yup, our company is haemorrhaging software engineers also. We are down to only a couple of staff who actually know the system now. The risk to the company (and its a big company) would seem unacceptable to me, you'd think they would have done something to try and keep the staff that have left. But what do I know, I'm not management. I think the market for IT is much much better than people would have you believe.

    73. Re:The main issue by NateTech · · Score: 1

      In this economy, any company that can't afford to install a basically free webserver -- probably isn't going to be around very much longer anyway. They're all behind the eightball.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    74. Re:The main issue by DedTV · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yep. Same thing happened to me.

      I, along with 31 other people (plus one department manager and 3 shift managers) were hired to do end user technical support and basic QC work for a company web site (a research service) at $8/hr. 8 years later we had a staff of 15 (covered by a total of 6 managers who didn't seem to do anything at all) with half the vacation time and 3 times higher medical benefit payments than we had when I started due to a "benefit restructuring" 4 years into my employment when we were bought out by a larger company.

      And our job duties had gone from supporting that one website to supporting 9 websites and 130 specialized CD-Rom products; most with wildly different technical formats (they dissolved the 4 companies and dropped 2 support contracts that used to handle support for them), handling billing support phone calls (they dissolved the billing department), handling customer orientation calls and doing customer training (they eliminated the sales support staff that used to do that), filing new paperwork (sales support and billing paperwork that was handled by those departments), scanning old paper documents into electronic documents (they were going to hire people to do it, but decided to drop it on us), sorting and addressing marketing flyers (over 8 years the marketing department went from 25 people to 3 and we got their spillover), processing returns on products due to incorrect mailing addresses (the mail department over 8 years went from 6 people to one semi-retired old lady who worked part time 3 days a week), handling internal support calls when some sales rep's computer was so bogged down with adware that it would blue screen 5 or 6 times a day (they dissolved the Internal Help Desk department), and any of a half dozen or more "special projects" that were dumped on us from sister companies, other departments, or stuff the mangers and their assistants should be doing but just "didn't have time" for.

      But I got supremely lucky and ended up becoming financially secure when my parents' business got bought out for an insane amount of money (I got 10% which was enough to ensure I could live fairly well without ever having to work again). I didn't tell anyone about it but I did start saying I wouldn't take on more responsibilities unless there was an appropriate increase in pay and benefits when they'd try to drop more and more work on us. I wasn't being beligerant or anything. Just reasonable. I wanted to keep working because I have a family and am no socialite, I liked most of the people I worked with, and sitting around the house watching TV every day would drive me mad pretty quickly. But I also didn't have to eat crap and smile about it.

      Within 3 months, suddenly my submission of a daily report we each had to submit into a database (that had no activity logs attached to it and which the managers all had full admin access to) suddenly wasn't appearing in the database at the end of the week. My assertion that I was submitting it was countered (if he was doing it, they'd be there. Everyone else's is!) by the managers I'd become a PITA to and I was fired for not being "capable of performing basic job duties". Which was nothing less than I expected. Although I didn't think they'd be quite that sleazy about it. After all, I'm in an at-will work state, they could have just said GTFO without contriving false incompetance.

      But, it did serve notice to everyone else working there just what sort of employer that place had become. And it started a chain reaction. That was just about 3 years ago. Within 6 months of me getting fired all but one person in the department had found a new job and left the company and not a one gave any notice (and when the last one graduates from College next year, he's outta there). Within a year they'd lost half their customers to competitors because the support and training had become attrocious due the fact that the economy hadn't tanked yet and most of the people they could get to stay past the first 2 weeks were a bunch o

    75. Re:The main issue by DedTV · · Score: 1

      Werd. There's a guy at my local Office Max who was a Mortgage Broker for 15 years but can't find any other jobs in the area.
      Best Buy and Staples are filled with people who worked in IT.
      Most of the places that had IT departments or needed developers in the area have shut down, outsourced, or are just putting extra work on existing employees who are too scared of getting fired to refuse.
      If you want a job in manufacturing or retail, stuff like that's picked back up around here a bit. But if you're in finance, tech, or most other professional fields the only jobs to be had are to replace the underpaid people who snapped under an overbearing workload.

      However, there's cities 6 hours away with listings for professional jobs a mile long. But oh wait, the housing market is in the crapper so if someone here is 7 or 8 years into a 30 year mortgage and wanted to move there, he'd probably end up owing the bank his first 2 years' salary if he could sell at all.

    76. Re:The main issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      congratulations, you were successfully trolled.

      idiot.

    77. Re:The main issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what people get for associating trade unionism with socialism when it's simply a way of levelling the playing field between management and worker. It's about justice, not politics.

      Where I work has one of the strongest trade unions in Australia, and one of the best paid, most stable, most productive workforces in the country.

      The IT industry was founded by smart kids who loved what they did, but now it's bosses versus wage slaves and itinerants as much as any industry without a union.

    78. Re:The main issue by Rysc · · Score: 1

      Your story intrigues me and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
    79. Re:The main issue by chrish · · Score: 1

      I bet the CxOs and managers who orchestrated this farce got some massive, massive bonuses.

      Before bailing to do it to another company.

      --
      - chrish
    80. Re:The main issue by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      If the OP can generate the impression that he could leave easily and still be OK then that puts him in a much stronger position whilst talking about a pay rise.

      One thing that I would advise him to do is keep discussions strictly between him and his boss, HR, etc. If he publicly says "I've got another job offer for more money, lets see if the company can match it" then the company will not just be looking at the cost of increasing his salary against replacing him. They will be looking at the potential cost of upping the salary of everyone he told as well as his against replacing him.

    81. Re:The main issue by shoehornjob · · Score: 1

      OMG. You raise midnight acquisitions to a new level of sneakiness. I salute you.

      --
      "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
    82. Re:The main issue by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      An underwater mortgage is underwater whether or not you choose to stay.

      Rent a house or apartment in the new city and put up your old house for rent if you don't want to realize the loss right now (or assume that the value will come back). As long as you find somewhere with comparable rent, you are still only out the difference between rental price and mortgage payment.

      --
      Bottles.
    83. Re:The main issue by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      I bet the CxOs and managers who orchestrated this farce got some massive, massive bonuses.

      Before bailing to do it to another company.

      But they have MBAs, so we know for certain that (a) those decisions were best for the company, and (b) they totally deserved those bonuses.

      Unless you're implying that every MBA I've ever met is a greedy, self-serving, company-destroying liar...

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    84. Re:The main issue by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      Maybe a warning the first time it happens. But it does make business sense to write up or fire people if they do it twice.

      Think about it. You have how many people sitting around for three hours in the morning wondering where all their chairs, whiteboards, and tables went? That's a several thousand dollar problem every time it happens.
      Add to that the tension that's going to be created between the two departments involved, that's got to be an HR nightmare.

      Firing those responsible makes perfect sense.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    85. Re:The main issue by redscare2k4 · · Score: 1

      Well, in my first job we did raid a printer and a rack. With my manager telling me "lets wait till lunch hour, there will be no one there" and then "lets go through this other corridor, there's usually no one there".

      So I can believe the chairs raid :D

      Back on topic, the fact that the company is not willling to hire more people does not mean they won't give a salary raise that would cost them a lot less than hiring another guy (even a junior). You're not going to double your income, but unless the company is in deep shit, you can maybe get a half-decent raise.

    86. Re:The main issue by DedTV · · Score: 1

      Actually, most of them got canned. Even management isn't safe when half the customers disappear in less than 2 years.
      And they did get bit by it being at at-will work state. No contracts. :) So at most they only got the standard 6 weeks severance for management (if they weren't fired with cause) and an opportunity to verify their mailing address so their stuff could be shipped to them as security walked them to their cars.
      The walk of shame is happily something only managers were subjected to. Regular employees have their stuff packed up by management and it's waiting for them in the front office. The only difference is the manager is waiting to hand it to you when you to come through the door if you're fired. If I hadn't told people I was fired, no one would have ever known.
      And this isn't New York or L.A. It's a midwest company that was bought by a company based in some podunk town in Virginia that itself was bought out by a company 2 or 3 times removed from the parent company which is based in the Netherlands. There was one company car for the entire company. A 2002 Blazer. They weren't big on stuff like bonuses or perks.

      And here, even the biggest cities are just overgrown small towns. We're smack in the middle of nowhere. The next large city is a 50 mile drive through overly congested, 2 lane 55MPH highways that are heavily patrolled by State Troopers with two first names like Joebob Wilson. People here *do not* like commuting.
      So, they might be able to find a job somewhere where they won't be known as one of the people who ran a good company into the ground, but it's not going to be very convenient.

    87. Re:The main issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with unions is that the idiot next to me that has been here forever because the union keeps him from getting fired that doesnt do half the work I do makes more money than me because he has been here longer. What most often ends up happening is that those who have been there forever end up selling out newcomers in future contracts. Capitolism works because the go where the money is. It is mercenary but thats what you get. You can work for a large company where your a small cog in a big machine and make the money you should be making. You can work for a small company for a long time and probably not be paid half what you should and do far more work. Or you can merc it out hop around as you need to till you get the job you really want then hope that job lasts. Unions take away that choice. You can go to a b or c at the same entry level job and not get that promotion you deserve because some guy has been there 5 months longer than you reguardless of whether he is any good at his job.

    88. Re:The main issue by AthleteMusicianNerd · · Score: 1

      You're on the right track, but you're incorrect as to how monopolies are formed. The government is a monopoly and creates monopolies. You can see how in recent history how they kept a financial oligopoly together with the recent couple TRILLION in bailouts. Had the government not stepped in, there would have been no more AIG, Lehman Brothers, GM, etc...(It's a long list)

      The FDIC ceased all of WAMU's assets and sold them to Chase at fire sale prices. Wamu is trying to fight back, but they will likely lose. The government does not allow for private mints and decides who can be a bank, and who can't. They made the dollar the only legal tender, when the constitution clearly states only Gold and Silver can be used as legal tender. By doing this, they are able to print up dollars at will. That's why we had to abandon the Gold Standard, they counterfeited too much money and couldn't make good on all of their promises. With most recent wave of bank failures, and the giants (BOA, Wells Fargo, Chase) still standing, we now have less competition in the financial industry.

      This is true of energy too. The government decides who can drill oil and where. They can't drill in ANWR, but can in the deepest portion of the Gulf of Mexico. They decide where power plants can be built. They decide who can be an electric company or gas company. If you don't believe me, buy a generator and try selling electricity to your neighbor. It won't be long before you get a cease and desist letter from the government.

      I agree with you that monopolies need to be broken up, but I would argue that putting this task in the biggest monopoly of them all is a flawed method.

    89. Re:The main issue by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You're on the right track, but you're incorrect as to how monopolies are formed. The government is a monopoly and creates monopolies. You can see how in recent history how they kept a financial oligopoly together with the recent couple TRILLION in bailouts.

      I disagree. Yes, these examples show how bad government regulation and actions create monopolies, but that's not the only way.

      Look at Microsoft. They didn't have any government help that I'm aware of. They naturally became a monopoly, because of many different things: desire of people to use the same OS, caused by incompatibility between OSes (you can't generally run the same app on different OSes, esp. before Java was invented), tough business tactics that shut down competitors, poor performance of competitors, etc. After a while, they became a monopoly all on their own.

      I'm sure examining the history of Standard Oil and other 19th century monopolies would show similar paths. In many cases, monopolies are simply the natural conclusion: successful businesses grow and grow, and their inertia and advantages from economies of scale allow them to crush smaller competitors, until they become a monopoly (defined as having the vast majority of marketshare). Wal-Mart is another good example of this. They're not yet a monopoly, but they own a giant portion of retail marketshare, and don't have a lot of serious competition (only Target, and what's left of KMart).

      I agree with you that monopolies need to be broken up, but I would argue that putting this task in the biggest monopoly of them all is a flawed method.

      Don't be ridiculous. If the government can't break up monopolies, who can? No one else has the power that government has. There's supposed to be a system of checks and balances; no one has enough power to counter giant corporations other than government, so it's naturally their job to make sure companies don't get too powerful. Moreover, government is (theoretically) directly answerable to the people, through elections, unlike any corporation, so there's a check on their power as well (if the people would grow a brain and vote better).

    90. Re:The main issue by AthleteMusicianNerd · · Score: 1
      Microsoft is not a monopoly. They have Apple, Linux, Oracle, IBM, Google, Yahoo, Sony, Nintendo, etc... to compete with. Apple has recently overtaken them in market cap.
      Since the inception of Microsoft, the cost of a computer has dropped substantially, in spite of inflation. In 1984, my dad purchase a desktop with 64K of RAM for $3000. Today, you can buy a Quadcore with 8GB of RAM for $600. If you look at that in terms of real money, that's about 10 ounces of gold vs. about 1/2 an ounce today. So the price has dropped 20 fold, while the performance has increased exponentially. (And obviously it's not just Microsoft that's responsible, it's Intel, Nvidia, AMD, and of course Microsoft's competitors)

      Successful businesses grow because they do right by the consumer. So if you're Microsoft, you deserve a $250 Billion market cap because the consumer decided they liked your product. The consumer can break up a monopoly, or a competitor can by offering something a large company doesn't. In the case of Apple overtaking Microsoft, the consumer decided Apple had a better product.

      No one else has the power that government has.

      Exactly. That's the problem. They have no accountability to anyone. Even a huge corporation like Microsoft is accountable to it's customers.

      They need to follow the laws of the constitution and enforce property rights. The government isn't even close to accountable to the people. They own the airwaves. They decide who can broadcast, and what they can say on them(Thus manipulating elections...I've heard it all too often that "I'm voting for Obama because McCain wasn't any good" THERE WERE ABOUT 5 or 6 OTHER THIRD PARTY CANDIDATES, PLUS THE PRIMARIES!!!). Now that the Internet is a threat to their monopoly, they're looking to take that over.

    91. Re:The main issue by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      That alone wraps up the whole Mexican labor thing in America. At least for the legal ones,
      But that part brings out a whoooole new can of worms.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    92. Re:The main issue by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      because that one employee would need to be paid for 120 or 160 hours of work per week, in order to achieve the same throughput as before

      Or have them on salary... when that's the case, they can run you ragged and not worry.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    93. Re:The main issue by The+Fanta+Menace · · Score: 1

      If they've got any brains at all, they'll just go home at 40 hours. That's what I do.

      --
      -- Even if a god did exist, why the fsck should I worship it?
  2. Dear Playboy, it happened to me by AnAdventurer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was in the same spot, hired as a web content person, next thing I knew I was IT manager for the corporation doing PC support, hands-on sever, PBX, twisted pair, web development and CSM rec, integration and more. I was working 60-80 a week and after 6 months I got a "good job" and no raise, another 2 months and I had to ask for a raise. I got a big "why and NO", needless to say my enjoyment of my job went to zero and it showed. I was asked to resign 3 weeks later. They has to hired 2 people to replace me.

    --
    6.8SPC TR of 550, l xwind at 6, drift rt at 26" drops 77". AT has 503 ft-lbs at 1403 fps. FT 0.86
    1. Re:Dear Playboy, it happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They has to hired 2 people to replace me.

      I can has cheezburger?

    2. Re:Dear Playboy, it happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I got a big "why and NO", needless to say my enjoyment of my job went to zero and it showed. I was asked to resign 3 weeks later.

      FYI, being fired had nothing to do with your perceived level of enjoyment. They didn't like you and were looking to get rid of you all along.

    3. Re:Dear Playboy, it happened to me by williamhb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I was in the same spot, hired as a web content person, next thing I knew I was IT manager for the corporation doing PC support, hands-on sever, PBX, twisted pair, web development and CSM rec, integration and more. I was working 60-80 a week and after 6 months I got a "good job" and no raise, another 2 months and I had to ask for a raise. I got a big "why and NO", needless to say my enjoyment of my job went to zero and it showed. I was asked to resign 3 weeks later. They has to hired 2 people to replace me.

      So this is part of the issue: under those circumstances what you ask for is not a "raise" but an appointment to the position you are doing (which co-incidentally happens to come with a jump in salary). If they see it as "Joe Bloggs wants more money" they'll tend to say no. HR and management are well-practiced in trying to minimise salary creep across their organisations. If they see it as "Joe Bloggs is asking to step up to the next stage of his career, he's clearly been gaining the experience necessary, and if we say no he's likely to take that step up elsewhere" they are more likely to say yes. HR and management are also well-versed in how they are *supposed* to support career-development (even though it takes prodding to get them to do it), and the fact they have given you extra responsibilities suggests you are an employee they don't want to lose. Of course, you also have to be 'not bluffing' -- if they don't move on the appointment, don't be grumpy but just go elsewhere using the experience and skills they have given you. It's a small world, and you may well end up working for them again in a more senior role later.

    4. Re:Dear Playboy, it happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      My scenario is just the opposite:
      I am working for a start up of around 60 people : I would like to think that I am one of the most important people in the company.
      Two of the most important projects just hinge on my work alone, and we are breaking new ground because of the work that I do in the company.

      The owner is a very nice person - and has even asked me whether I need a raise - subtly. I am an extremely meek person - and even though I would prefer a good raise (who wouldnt?), I am feeling extremely shy to say that to him. When I joined the company 1 year back too, I joined with a moderate salary even when the owner was suggesting that I should be getting more salary - and that was again due to this meekness.

      I think this should be a usual problem - how do you people solve this?

    5. Re:Dear Playboy, it happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nailed it.

    6. Re:Dear Playboy, it happened to me by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think this should be a usual problem - how do you people solve this?

      Man up. Or at least accept the offers - it doesn't take a lot of courage to say yes.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    7. Re:Dear Playboy, it happened to me by IntlHarvester · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The important thing to understand is that promotions aren't about the past, you owe me, I deserve it, etc etc. They are about the future and what potential at the company you have. I've found that as long as you are positioning the conversation that way, there is almost no harm in asking for more money.

      And yeah, grow a pair. You will never get paid any more than what you ask for.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    8. Re:Dear Playboy, it happened to me by Surt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is pretty easy to handle:
      Find out what the fair salary is for your job, call that X. Tell your boss that you thought about what he said, and after reviewing salary information, it seems like X + 10% would be fair.

      A lot of people are telling you to man up, but not how to do it. You are afraid to hurt your boss. Be more afraid to hurt your (possibly future) children by depriving them of a great college education, or the backing of their first business venture, etc, because you didn't earn a fair wage. Put the lives of people you love before the life of your boss, who is clearly prepared to do the right thing anyway.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    9. Re:Dear Playboy, it happened to me by dcollins · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Disagree. This is a "Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by incompetence" situation.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    10. Re:Dear Playboy, it happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly. Don't assume the employer was maliciously trying to get rid of him. Chances are he was incompetent and they always wanted to get rid of him.

    11. Re:Dear Playboy, it happened to me by primerib · · Score: 5, Interesting

      When you ask for a raise or a promotion, you are upping the ante and entering into a haggling situation. You are implicitly saying "Scrutinize me and you'll find that my skills and contributions to the company far exceed my level of compensation, to the point that there's a real chance of another company offering me superior compensation". Remember, the vast majority of companies won't give a raise because it's the fair thing to do, they give a raise because it's a better value to secure that employee's skills in the workplace than to risk having them hired up by another company. That said, the best advice I've been given is to never ask for a raise unless you have a job offer from another company in hand.

      Beyond that, all the companies I've worked at as an adult have had an unwritten policy of saying "No, why?" to anyone's first raise request. This makes sense because for a good portion of people requesting raises you will be calling their bluff; they will either back down and take the same pay they had, or show through their actions that they weren't worth a raise at all. A select few will come back with a bargaining chip and an ultimatum ("This is what the market says about my value, and these will be the consequences of you not giving me a raise"), and ask for a second raise... In my experience, these are the people who actually have a real chance of getting a raise. Additionally, some of the companies I worked at had policies in place that required both HR and the employee's direct management to approve a raise, so there was no way they could say 'Yes' the first time someone asked.

      As it stands, you asked your company to intensely scrutinize your contributions to the workplace and then immediately showed them that your job at their company isn't important to you.
      If I were your manager, I probably would've fired you too. My logic would have been: "Hmm, so he asked for a raise because he must have received a job offer, and after the initial meeting he's no longer doing his work... That would indicate that he has accepted a position at another company and was using the raise question here as leverage for negotiations at his new job. He has no intention of staying, and his continued presence in the workplace is a risk to the company".

    12. Re:Dear Playboy, it happened to me by CAIMLAS · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Maybe if your language skills were a bit better - and you were able to effectively convey a point - you'd have gotten those raises? My experience is that it's worth the effort to improve the "soft skills": you'll make more.

      Also, an "IT manager" is not going to be doing PC support. Sorry. At best, you were the sysadmin for a small company.

      That said, I can relate. I've been in the exact same situation you have (sans the poor language skills), and it sucks. Best thing you can do for yourself is to learn to screen the shitty jobs and interview your interviewers thoroughly. It's worth taking lower pay - even with a lot of work - if you're going to be working with, and for, people you like.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    13. Re:Dear Playboy, it happened to me by Billly+Gates · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Keep in mind they could have liked him but could not afford to have him quit if he *is* I.T. at the company. Employers sometimes fire based on someone asking for a raise because its a sign he or she might quit or the raise is too much and needs to be scaled back. Some I.T. departments fire employees who look for work elsewhere or interview because its a security threat with those who have confidential data and a history of an ex-worker abusing it. I am sure the lawyers advise to do this and I have read stories about this on slashdot and comments supporting this.

      Not all employers are like this but many are in this economy. Never assume anything when a poor sap losses his or her job. Half the time it is politics or some dumb reasons described above and half due to incompetence. If you're a teacher like your sig says you understand then. How many teachers in non-union or non tenured are let go?

    14. Re:Dear Playboy, it happened to me by Klinky · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe employers should be up front with people about their responsibilities and pay. Doing a Bait & Switch with job responsibilities and then ignoring these actions is just a way for the company to leech the most out of you. Frankly I think it'd be important to remind your manager of your job title before you start doing stuff outside of your job description. Companies will take, take, take & give as little as they possibly can in return.

    15. Re:Dear Playboy, it happened to me by Klinky · · Score: 1

      I am glad you figured out he had poor language skills from an single paragraph informally posted on the Internet. Guess what I got out of your post? That you're a dick.

    16. Re:Dear Playboy, it happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I am an extremely meek person ...

      I think this should be a usual problem - how do you people solve this?

      I would suggest you see a well-reputed CBT therapist for about 10-20 sessions during the next year.

    17. Re:Dear Playboy, it happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To find out typical salary for your position in your area, check out sites like salary.com or payscale.com.
      Many trade magazines like IT Weekly also do yearly compensation surveys and publish the results.

    18. Re:Dear Playboy, it happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think that's bad, try working for a manufacturing plant.

      I was their IT guy. Now they want me to do factory labor almost full time (unless a computer is broken).

      Suffice it to say, I'm looking for a new job.

    19. Re:Dear Playboy, it happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, ask for the promotion and not just the money. If you have a diverse skillset, then you can find something else. I had the same issue a few years back. I was working for a company and started out just writing software. After they were purchsed, many of the developers were laid off or just moved to the acquiring company. The acquiring company eventually had me doing the BA, PM, Architect, Developer, and Manager (offshore, test, etc) work. I asked for a promotion since more money would come with it. I also wanted to have the actual power that came with it. I was told no and why. I shopped myself around and found another company to go to. The company who did not want to give me the promotion was very willing to give me what I wanted then. However, you always stick with you decision when you make it. You look even worse if you wimp out.

    20. Re:Dear Playboy, it happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As it stands, you asked your company to intensely scrutinize your contributions to the workplace and then immediately showed them that your job at their company isn't important to you.
      If I were your manager, I probably would've fired you too. My logic would have been...

      Lies and deceit! Turn and repent! Some teams on IBM, for example, pull the same crap. 60-80 hrs. a week is inhumane treatment. But that's what we get for letting these big corps abuse capitalism! They should've been nipped-in-the-bud long ago on such employee mistreatment and disrespectful, deceitful perspectives, such as primerib represents. So much for *ADULTHOOD*, primerib!!

    21. Re:Dear Playboy, it happened to me by Phoobarnvaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe employers should be up front with people about their responsibilities and pay. Doing a Bait & Switch with job responsibilities and then ignoring these actions is just a way for the company to leech the most out of you. Frankly I think it'd be important to remind your manager of your job title before you start doing stuff outside of your job description. Companies will take, take, take & give as little as they possibly can in return.

      This is the way it is right now...but what about in the future? Was reading the other day that if other jobs were available...many people (over 50%) would jump in a heartbeat. With this being the case...I understand businesses are into the here and now...rather than what will happen when their employees are able to head somewhere else. What sob story will the business pull to keep all the employees they screwed over during this time when "the rats start jumping ship"?

      Am a very firm believer in karma & the biblical Golden Rule...since these businesses will eventually reap what they've sowed. I hear very few stories about businesses doing right by their employees...but stories right and left about them not doing right.

      --
      Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia. - Charles M. Schulz
    22. Re:Dear Playboy, it happened to me by Swampash · · Score: 1

      Similar thing happened to me a while back. After a reorg I found myself in a meeting with my boss having it explained to me how my responsibilities were changing and how I'd be expected to take up the slack of departed/reorg'd former team-mates.

      I said no.

      I said "I've got a contract that says my role is X and in it I do Y for Z dollars. If you want to change Y, great - let's talk about the new contract describing my new role X and my new Z dollars. No new contract? Forget it."

      Every boss and every company will try to fuck you. If you don't stand up for yourself, you'll GET fucked.

    23. Re:Dear Playboy, it happened to me by 7-Vodka · · Score: 1

      Close mouth don't get fed.

      --

      Liberty.

    24. Re:Dear Playboy, it happened to me by Rogue974 · · Score: 1

      Many good points. In my last job, my first raise was so low as to be insulting, and I told my boss at the evaluation. A few months later, I was ready to quit and told my boss, correct my wage or I am gone. He gave me a bump and promise of a larger bump at raise time. the larger bump was not what he promised so 3 months later, I had a job offer and was ready to quit, and I got an even larger bump with a promotion and new bonus structure to stay on. 8 months later, the new bonus plan turned out to be bogus and my $10K-12K promised bonus turned out to be $96. 4 months later, I was gone to a new job. Lessons learned: If you are going to try and negotiate a new wage/bump, you have to have a job offer in hand because it is a go for broke type scenario. If you do not have an alternative (which I did everytime I spoke to them) you will not really be able to negotiated it properly because most places will "call your bluff". Some places will fire you afterwards or you will become unhappy and get yourself fired. Also, if you are unhappy for some reason and not being valued by your company, chance are you never will be. After 4 years with the company and arguing and being promoted, sunshine blown up my dark nether regions repeatedly, in the end they never really appreciated the work I did and compensated me appropriately for it. Finally, there have been studies (sorry, been too long since I read them and can't find them) that show that a large percentage (70%+) of people who get into this negotiating war with a company end up leaving in a year anyway after they get the higher wage. If your company is not valuing you, be prepared to leave when you ask the question. If you are bluffing, you will probably loose and because you have to ask the question, you will more then likely ultimately leave shortly after given the raise or not.

    25. Re:Dear Playboy, it happened to me by irishdaze · · Score: 1

      It's a small world, and you may well end up working for them again in a more senior role later.

      Working in IT in the fourth largest city in America has given me the opportunity time and time again to see that this is true. I can't stress strongly enough how your reputation and attitude follow/preceed you.

      I'm not in management, but I have been a team lead. I've had opportunities to yay/nay resumes before interviews because, Hey, you worked at Such-And-Such, and so did this guy. Do you know him? I regret that I've had to answer with a hearty Don't hire him!" every single time.

      Remember that, as long as you work in IT, every single person (regardless of their function) you work with/near/for/around is a possible future yay/nay for you.

      Whatever you do when you find yourself in the OP's situation, remember to maintain the highest level of professionalism and the best attitude you can. I promise, it will pay off, even if you have no way of seeing the payoff when it arrives.

      --
      -- Dedicated Cthulhu cultist since 1982 A.C.E.
    26. Re:Dear Playboy, it happened to me by windex82 · · Score: 1

      Is there some kind of IT hierarchy you could point me to with descriptions of job duties for each?

      I don't think it exists and half of the titles overlap with 90% of all the other titles.

    27. Re:Dear Playboy, it happened to me by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      The professional way to word this is Penis, Sir.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  3. Welcome to the world... by dugjohnson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You are the owner of a company called you.  You are experiencing feature creep from your main and only client, your employer.  Assuming you are still responsible for what you were originally hired for, you need to point out that you are now being asked to do a lot more than you originally signed on to do, and that you need to reach a new understanding that will work for both of you.

    Be professional.  Be firm.  You might want to read some back blogs by Bob Lewis, as he covers this kind of stuff all the time.

    A couple of examples
    http://www.infoworld.com/d/adventures-in-it/when-raises-dry-negotiate-hard-get-what-you-deserve-404
    http://www.infoworld.com/d/adventures-in-it/be-your-own-boss-even-if-you-have-boss-037

    --
    My brain is overly lubricated
    1. Re:Welcome to the world... by Luke+has+no+name · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why do you post in monotype?

    2. Re:Welcome to the world... by Nikker · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe he talks in monotone?

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    3. Re:Welcome to the world... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Using a typewriter.

    4. Re:Welcome to the world... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's like a console. To UNIX and *NIX people, this is very cool. I support his posting in monotype, and encourage him to continue doing so. Long live the console!

    5. Re:Welcome to the world... by fm6 · · Score: 1, Funny

      No. This. Is. How. Such. A. Per. Son. Types.

    6. Re:Welcome to the world... by wraithguard01 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it's all... fixed width, and this isn't a code writing environment. It kinda makes me feel like he's a robot though. When I read the comment, I pictured a robot in my mind.

    7. Re:Welcome to the world... by fm6 · · Score: 2, Informative

      He entered the comment in code mode.

      http://slashdot.org/faq/com-mod.shtml#cm2300

    8. Re:Welcome to the world... by Kenoli · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why do you post in monotype?

      He must do it to make sure his comment is simply skipped over.

      I naturally tend to ignore anything with unusual formatting. It's like they're shouting "Look at me! Look at me!". No, shut up.

    9. Re:Welcome to the world... by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't you mean:

      Because it's like a console. To UNIX and *NIX people, this is very cool. I suppo
      rt his posting in monotype, and encourage him to continue doing so. Long live th
      e console!

    10. Re:Welcome to the world... by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      Monotype is a corporate standard across the entire company called you.

    11. Re:Welcome to the world... by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I work in accounting and because of that I have learned to love fixed width. It's great for sending financial data, because you can generate a spread sheet in a plane text e-mail. Also, no need for attachments.

      --
      We are the Borg...
    12. Re:Welcome to the world... by oiron · · Score: 2, Funny

      Captain Kirk! Is that you?

    13. Re:Welcome to the world... by AllergicToMilk · · Score: 1

      But, most importantly, make sure you have other options first.

      --
      There are only 6,863,795,529 types of people in the world.
    14. Re:Welcome to the world... by Aphex+Junkie · · Score: 4, Funny

      He just kept talking in one long incredibly unbroken sentence moving from topic to topic so that no one had a chance to interrupt
      it was really quite hypnotic

    15. Re:Welcome to the world... by Peach+Rings · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have learned to love fixed width. It's great for sending financial data, because you can generate a spread sheet in a plane text e-mail

      *horror*

    16. Re:Welcome to the world... by Lissajous · · Score: 1

      +1 Picard

    17. Re:Welcome to the world... by ygslash · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are the owner of a company called you... Be professional. Be firm...

      Bad idea as a first move. By doing this, you are effectively quitting your current job, and at the same time looking for a new one at the same company.

      First, look around for other opportunities, without letting on at work that you are the least bit dissatisfied. In the meantime, be diligent, work hard, and show that you are proud of your good work. That positive attitude will surely help you find a better position, either at your current company or at another.

      Once you have an outside offer, that is the time to start the negotiations. Even then, don't tell them yet that you have another offer. If they say yes, they'll never have to know, and your relationship with your employer will stay positive and strong. If they say no, you'll both understand that it means it's time part ways. They'll be happy to hear that you're not out in the cold.

    18. Re:Welcome to the world... by Urkki · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it's all... fixed width, and this isn't a code writing environment.

      What does "code writing environment" have to do with "fixed width"?

    19. Re:Welcome to the world... by genner · · Score: 1

      Why do you post in monotype?

      He must do it to make sure his comment is simply skipped over. I naturally tend to ignore anything with unusual formatting. It's like they're shouting "Look at me! Look at me!". No, shut up.

      I'm sorry did you say something? Your exclamation points almost made me skip your post.

    20. Re:Welcome to the world... by dugjohnson · · Score: 1

      Because I don't post often and had never gone to the effort to figure out where I'd change this. Monotype came up. Probably was a default somewhere back when they switched something. I've changed it now. Nothing like a little helpful criticism to get one rolling.

      --
      My brain is overly lubricated
    21. Re:Welcome to the world... by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean:

      Because it's like a console . . .!

      Is is much more efficient to produce tex
      aer eht gnitanimile ,"swolp xo eht sa" t
      der's need to slew his eyeballs back to
      OH ym tsuj-enil txen eht fo gninnigeb eht

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    22. Re:Welcome to the world... by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Oh, I thought he just had Asperger's.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    23. Re:Welcome to the world... by Kenoli · · Score: 1

      It doesn't count if I'm paraphrasing a poorly formatted post duh

    24. Re:Welcome to the world... by cycleflight · · Score: 1

      Great. Now my brain is techno dancing to DJ Stewart.

      --
      "...And who wants to make buttprints in the sands of time?" ~Bob Moawad
  4. Wait until 1 month to launch by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Then tell them "More money or I go. Yes, I know that I'm basically what the whole thing hangs on. I'm your project manager, your web monkey, your server manager, your everything, basically. So, let's discuss my payment, title and other job perks".

    But phrase it nicely. Managers don't like to have a dagger at their throat. Even if they basically handed it to you.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Wait until 1 month to launch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100% correct.

      Here's what will happen if you go to them after launch. They will tell you that it is a "temporary role", and you'll be getting back to your "real" job soon.

      You have leverage now. Use it or lose it. That's the way of the world.

    2. Re:Wait until 1 month to launch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "More money or I go" - and "a HOT intern to bang!"

    3. Re:Wait until 1 month to launch by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Sadly, you can get all of those things from a 25k/year college student so they'll probably just tell him to take a running jump.

      Nothing he does requires any skills these days.

      His original job would be describe as entirely frivolous.

      So they made him actually do a little work and not even hard work, but to top it off he clearly states he's not qualified to do it.

      Personally, I'd fire him and go down the street and higher an undergrad. The company doesn't even sell a product yet, and its not like they have a big infrastructure when someone else tells you to 'go set it up on Amazon' you know its something trivial to do.

      He's went from a frivolous job to a semi-real one and has to work so he's complaining. He'll get what he deserves, but don't bet on a raise.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  5. Amnesia an option? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Amnesia? Do you recall what a LAMP is for? I think they are used to shine light on the book I'm reading.
    Tell them you aren't happy with the changes and that you'd like a normal work week in the job you were hired. Be prepared if they elect to have a different idea, so hopefully, you've saved 12 months of living expenses.

    You don't want to work at a place that fires people for standing up for their needs as humans.
    You need to not work all the time.
    You need to have a family life and life outside work.
    You need to be fairly compensated for your skills and work. Anything above the original deal (offer letter) is a chance for re-negotiation, which you are happy to entertain.

    That greener grass over the fence is better than being an over worked ox.

    1. Re:Amnesia an option? by GaryOlson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly.
      Work your 40 hours, leave. Prioritize your work; don't do everything they deem "required". If you do not treat yourself like a human being, the company won't either. If the company does not see the value of your contributions now, they never will. Find a different company.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    2. Re:Amnesia an option? by bbernard · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'd advise having an exit strategy in the works. Start interviewing because there is no better time to negotiate a new job than when you currently have one. You don't want to work for a company that is willing to "knowingly" take advantage of you. If you're comfortable with your management chain, bring this issue up to them.

      Under no circumstances "threaten" to leave, or tell them that you've got a new job and want them to match salaries, etc. Get yourself an offer you like, and then start negotiating with your current employer. If you tell them you're looking at leaving or that you've got a new job offer, their motivation will only be to placate you until they can replace you. If you "work with them" on aligning your salary with your tasks you've got a better job at keeping a long-term relationship with them.

      Otherwise, find a better job opportunity and take it.

      --
      ----- Connection reset by beer
    3. Re:Amnesia an option? by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Thats what I did, but then I wasn't performing nearly as well (according to their "metrics") as my co-workers who were putting in 60+ hours a week - so when layoffs came I was chopped.

      They managed to lose every account I managed (support accounts) a year after I was canned and that cost the company several million a year in revenue in contracts alone, but then I was having a hard time managing all that stuff anyhow + everything else they wanted to dump on me.

    4. Re:Amnesia an option? by ktappe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      [At 40 hours/week] I wasn't performing nearly as well (according to their "metrics") as my co-workers who were putting in 60+ hours a week - so when layoffs came I was chopped.

      They managed to lose every account I managed (support accounts) a year after I was canned and that cost the company several million a year in revenue in contracts alone, but then I was having a hard time managing all that stuff anyhow + everything else they wanted to dump on me.

      I'd lay odds you don't miss that job one bit. Further, I bet you feel better about yourself now than you did then. You certainly feel better than your 60+ hours/week ex-coworkers who are stressed out and have no personal lives. And knowing the wrong they did you cost them millions HAS to feel great.

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    5. Re:Amnesia an option? by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Get yourself an offer you like, and then start negotiating with your current employer

      Bad advice.

      The current employer will see this as blackmail.

      You turn down the new employer, the current employer sacks you a month later, and you're screwed.

      Take the job with the new employer. If they want you back, they can then offer more money - sit on the offer - it will be good for a raise with your new employer at the 3-month review.

      But don't go back to the old one for at least a year.

    6. Re:Amnesia an option? by MechaStreisand · · Score: 1

      He didn't say, "tell them you have an offer". In fact, I got the impression he meant for that to be kept a secret. So his advice could, in fact, work.

      --
      Disclaimer: IANAL. This post is, however, legal advice, and creates an attorney-client relationship.
    7. Re:Amnesia an option? by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      No, fuck that. If you have another job offer from a better company, you TAKE IT. Taking a second-chance offer from a current employer will only make them lose all respect for you.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    8. Re:Amnesia an option? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to move on. Your situation has become unsolvable. I left a job at NASA for a similar reason. As I provided my two week notice, I smiled and said that I've miss the work and the people, but was looking forward to new and different challenges.

      If you get an offer from another company that you like (you like the company and the offer), take it. Never look back. The old company may offer to match the offer, but you don't want that. Don't even consider it.

      I speak from experience and 8 different employers. Your manager will be told to make a counter offer. If you consider it, you will have lost more respect from them. Don't do it. Don't pause to think about it. If they ask whether you are will to listen to a counter offer, tell them no, immediately.

      Why? You've already made your unhappiness known. They are simply trying to extend you until they can replace you at a more convenient time FOR THEM. The only way you can "get them", if that's the term, without any repercussions, is to give them 2 weeks notice. Don't do anything harmful towards the company in the last few days or after you've left. Don't become a trouble maker for the other people staying behind. Work just like you have the other months/years you were there. These days, there are legal repercussions for doing that and honestly, in 3 years it won't matter to you anymore.

    9. Re:Amnesia an option? by Stray7Xi · · Score: 1

      You've already given them the expectation that you will do both positions. So if you try to back off now you appear like a poor sport. The important part is you never let them conflate it as one job, emphasize that they are two separate positions.

      You should first ask for a promotion. Don't ask for a raise and don't say your entitled to anything. Simply state that when the position was left vacant you took on the extra responsibilities and proven you're capable of handling that position. Now you want to move up and fill the vacancy. Make it into a "I want career development within the company" instead of "I want more". If you're really feeling lucky ask for a subordinate.

      And if they refuse you, show your disappointment that they don't think you can handle the position... and go back to your regular duties. So you can use this as a break from those duties. "I was trying to prove myself until I found out I wasn't being considered for that position."

  6. You have one option... by masdog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dust off your resume and start updating it. You probably won't get more money or a new title unless you threaten to leave. At that point, they'll look to replace you anyway, so you might as well find a new job.

    1. Re:You have one option... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, if you are in the USA, you stand no chance. Our country is spiraling downwards and vanishing as an organized capitalist economy, and soon the United States will be just hordes of unemployed living in shacks, so there is no hope left (except if you get a job for the Census, but that happens every 10 years only...)
      And by all the symptoms you telling, if I was you I would be looking for a new job because seems that company is probably going bankrupt very soon. They fired everybody, you accumulating 5 functions with the salary of half one, they going Amazon cloud shit, so they don't even got money for their own servers and colo.
      So, run while you still have money for the gas, and drive Canada or some place that is not crumbling down to poverty like the USA.

    2. Re:You have one option... by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      My only modification to your suggestion is to be even more proactive about the change of venue. I recently changed jobs and gave my previous employer exactly two weeks notice (to the minute)

      Believe me, if they're willing to require 80 hours a week from you, they will be more than willing to say no to new terms.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    3. Re:You have one option... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly the crumbling American educational system failed you...

    4. Re:You have one option... by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Might as well either way. This company is going to be out of business within 24 months. It's dead already it just hasn't realized it.

      Every dieing company always finds one poor sucker to actually run it as long as it'll go. The engine is dead you're just out behind pushing it.

      I had a friend who asked for an extremely meager pay raise and change in title. Not even an improved title, just a title he liked better! Like Programmer vs Developer type title change. They both denied his raise and then also denied his title change request. He quit and along with him went a huge portion of the company's clients.

      I've seen this happen over and over again. It always ends the same.

      Ask for your raise. Ask for your title change. But know that you're working for a zombie. And the first day that they're late on a paycheck quit because you're never getting any more.

    5. Re:You have one option... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would suggest going beyond that. Dust off the resume, get it floating. Wait till you've got a few interviews coming in, take some paid vacation to do them if you can. Then, write up a full narrative for whoever will be signing off on the raise. Do it up! Make it a big story. Don't sob or complain, just confidently weave a tale of your exploits on behalf of their company. Explain to them what your original duties were, what new duties you've had added, and what a person to do each of those duties individually costs. Show them the total savings they'd STILL get over all those people if they gave you a raise, and wait for their response.

      This DOES in fact work. I started at $27k when a company hired me vastly under-valued, then I completely overhauled their network, and my boss was blown away by the quality of work. Then they added graphic artist for an entire ad campaign. Then I started learning basic development. I completely changed the way this small company worked. I pulled 60-70 hour weeks for 6 months. Then I finally had gone as far as I could on that horrible pay. I wrote up a long narrative about what I had done, how enough people to do all I do would be worth $150k as a group, and how JUST for the network admin work I should be paid around $45k-$50k for their size network. I then asked for $50k to do all those jobs. I submitted the paper to the head of HR and the owner of the company, since my direct boss was too scared to ask for that as it would put my pay over his.

      I received $46k/yr, and since it put me too close to my boss in pay, he received a raise as well. On his birthday.

      Show them you're valuable with your work, then tell them the story so they can't ignore it. Worst that happens is they say no and ask you to leave. You take one of your other opportunities and move on to something (hopefully) better. Either way, you win.

    6. Re:You have one option... by LordActon · · Score: 1

      Do NOT threaten to leave. Don't hint at it. Your options are your options, unless you back yourself into a corner.

      It's extremely aggressive. Put the shoe on the other foot: when was the last time your boss told you "Do it or you're fired"? How would you react? How would you react if it would't affect your income?

      Remember, your job is much more important to you than to your boss. Treat it with respect, not like a poker chip.

  7. More Information Needed by fat_mike · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How long have you worked there?

    What's your education level (do you have a degree)?

    How is your relationship with your boss?

    Do you have another job offer you could use as leverage

    I don't know why the first post above got modded zero because unfortunately the AC is correct. Its nothing personal.

    If they can't afford to complete projects then it is very likely they can't afford to give you a raise. Then again you are essentially exceeding your job description. If they hired you to write and then asked you to also edit other articles, that's one thing but they're asking you to take on a whole other role in a different department. I am curious though, how much does a writer for a blog site pull down?

    1. Re:More Information Needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All job descriptions include "Other duties as assigned".

  8. Umm, yeah.... by Duradin · · Score: 1

    Umm, yeah... I'm going to need you to come in on Saturday.

  9. Just ask. by MrCrassic · · Score: 2, Informative

    You and your client need web servers to launch the site. It's as simple as that. Tell them that if they can't afford cloud-based hosting, the alternative is a local solution that YOU (or whoever you hire) will be fully responsible for, from software maintenance all the way down to help desk support. Make sure they know that this is MUCH more expensive (because you WILL charge them accordingly for this, right?) and is not recommended (because I hope you value your time).

    If I'm reading the problem right, I find it very irresponsible that the client went ahead with a website redesign project without thinking this far ahead. I hope they didn't rely on you to provide everything, because that definitely tells me they were looking for someone to abuse.

    Either way, you need to be confident and ask for what you want. At this point and with this predicament, it would be more expensive and less wise for them to find some cheaper, so you have the leeway to do this.

    I speak for the rest of us freelancers when I wish you good luck in getting it done!

    1. Re:Just ask. by MrCrassic · · Score: 1

      Forgot to add: ask with respect, but don't be shy about it.

  10. Bad, Bad Idea by chevman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    As a manager, I can tell you its this sort of short-sightedness that will buy you a one way ticket to the street.

    1 month to launch? Sure, no problem, we'll give you a 10k per year raise.

    And then we'll show you the exit a week or two after launch.

    You think you're irreplaceable?

    I think every time I post a new position I get 100 candidates more qualified than your dumbass.

    1. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As an accountant, I can tell you its this sort of short-sightedness that will slowly run your company into the ground.

      The problems here is there's not enough money to go around, and rather than give someone a payrise that would probably see their morale improve and thus often their performance as a knock-on effect you're advocating saving $10k by spending a completely disproportionate amount on advertisement and interviews. Beyond that after the very expensive exercise of actually hiring someone you end up with some idiot who is not only equally dissatisfied with their job and may soon after just run through and ask for the same payrise, but also has no frigging clue about how the company runs and needs to be retrained from the ground up, not to mention that there's a lot of interpersonal relationships that often promote efficiencies that you're advocating just pissing against the wall.

      You sir are what is wrong with management today. The flat out attitude that an employee's entire worth is valued by the number they get paid. I hope one day when you fire 500 people so that your can afford a new personal jet each employee comes up and takes turn punching you in your fat face.

    2. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As your employee, I know that your ass is on the line to maintain productivity with the budget you have. Good luck hiring those 100 other applicants who will not handle half as much workload that you shifted on me without asking twice as much as I'm asking for a raise.

      Managers often think that hard-working employees can be replaced easily. Those are the managers who are usually first canned during departmental restructuring because of their "turn-over" rate. A good manager knows how to be effective at balancing his employees happiness with the company's productivity.

    3. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As a manager, I can tell you its this sort of short-sightedness that will buy you a one way ticket to the street. 1 month to launch? Sure, no problem, we'll give you a 10k per year raise. And then we'll show you the exit a week or two after launch. You think you're irreplaceable? I think every time I post a new position I get 100 candidates more qualified than your dumbass.

      And your attitude is the exact reason why I'm leaving I/T if I can do it. People who work their ass off should be rewarded and NOT replaced. Why? Because if you reward them and keep them they'll work their ass off for you AGAIN and AGAIN.

      --

      "Bah!" - Dogbert
    4. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet undoubtedly your dumb ass couldn't do the job, and you get paid plenty more to do what? Bully people, write reports, and talk in meetings?

      You are absolutely right that there are 100 people lining up for the job. It will take them six months to get up to speed. Many of the ones who are more qualified on paper are either lying on their resumes or else don't have the actual skill to back up their "qualifications". And almost undoubtedly, you are one of these people. That's how the world works, and we all know it.

      You're allowed your arrogance and position just so long as you don't step on the wrong toes too hard. With the attitude you're displaying, your time is undoubtedly coming.

    5. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think you're irreplaceable?

      I think every time I post a new position I get 100 candidates more qualified than your dumbass.

      To be honest sweetie, I am irreplaceable at 60k per year.

      The great thing is that management like you is far more replaceable than I ever will be because I actually do something.

      You, however, are an inconsequential dipshit who likely holds a degree in business administration or marketing.

    6. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by muphin · · Score: 1

      I agree

      What you need to do is organise a meeting with the dept manager and HR rep, bring up your work description, acknowledge you position and what other work you have contributed and helped with the company and acknowledge that the finances are a bit tight right now so you would like to renegotiate your contract and within that contract apply appropriate wages and benefits and employment protection (not get fired without good reason). If you were employed for said work and done more than what you are employed for you are entitled to be paid for that said work, or leave (as your loosing out for doing more work than being paid for), make sure during negotiation that you bring up the cost of employing 1 or more people, including hours/days/weeks lost in training and catching up with the projects, and with no documentation thats a few months work there....

      this should give you a fighting chance, always get everything in writing :)

      --
      It's not a typo if you understood the meaning!
    7. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go replace yourself.

    8. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      The goal is to take your skills and start your own business doing what your employer would have you do. Why not get the revenue if you're doing the work? Puts more managers like OP out of work as all they can typically do is "manage".

    9. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by schon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You think you're irreplaceable?

      I think every time I post a new position I get 100 candidates more qualified than your dumbass.

      And every single one of them wants triple what you're currently paying.

      Because if they were more qualified and willing to work for the same amount, you'd be replacing your current employee.

    10. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you misread Chevman's post. He didn't say he'd fire anyone who asked for a raise; he said he'd fire someone who used blackmail to get a raise. He didn't say anything about whether he would reward those people who do a good job.

    11. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by HangingChad · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As a manager, I can tell you its this sort of short-sightedness that will buy you a one way ticket to the street.

      And as a consultant who has seen many instances of the problem dictating the solution, your short-sightedness is going to bring you system failures, data loss, lower productivity and higher down stream costs.

      Imagine if you walked in to accounting and announced that they were also going to need to handle HR. I'm sure there would be a lot of surprised looks. But when it comes to IT managers think nothing of walking in telling them they're also going to be taking care of the phone system or the accounting system or any number other departmental systems and then expecting them to just add that to what they already do.

      I agree with the parent, you can't let other people set you up for failure. That's just as bad for your career. Got a call today for a job where the camel carrying too many straws quit. As they listed off all the required duties, I cut them off before they got to the end. It was a loser contract. They wanted 80 hours of work while paying for 40, the contracting process was a mess, then they tried to low ball the rate. Sometimes it's better to say no thanks.

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    12. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think one of the things missing is, based upon the summary, it sounds like the company is taking the actions I've seen far too often of a company that is about to go under. It certainly isn't be managed very well, but even if it was, these sound like desperate actions, and regardless of what is done, I doubt the poster is going to have a place to go to work within 6 months. I could be wrong, of course, but I've had some experience in this area unfortunately.

    13. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by __aasqbs9791 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unless they happen to be related to the owners.*

      *Sorry, personal pet peeve of mine.

    14. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by xmundt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Greetings and salutations...
                While this is a great exposition of the way management thinks, it also shows how truly short-sighted and unwise management can be. Lord knows, I have seen this sort of room-temperature IQ in companies MANY times over the years.
                The fact of the matter is that these are high-tech jobs that require a great deal of skill and knowledge. Also, EVERY setup like this is unique. it is not like hiring a new backhoe operator, where pretty much every backhoe works the same!
                now....let us say you put off the employee with pretty promises that you have no intentions of following through on. IT folks tend to be pretty bright, and, will catch on fairly quickly to this. Unless there are some rewards showing up, then, productivity will suffer, or, the quality of work will degrade. Without adequate rewards, you are, essentially, treating your employee as a slave, and, NO slave is very productive.
                  Say, you DO give the employee a big raise, with the intentions of dumping them after the project is "done". Again...this works once, at best, and if your IT person has any experience under their belt, that has probably already happened to them once. They will recognize this and, again...productivity and quality will suffer.
                  Do you want to know what the "tell" is in this scenario? The fact that the employee has been loaded with tons of extra work and responsibility, and has had to ASK for more money. The smart manager, who is truly interested in getting the project knocked out, getting a quality product, and keeping a valuable resource for the company will walk in and say something on the order of "we have these extra tasks to add to your job description, and, since we realize this is an expansion of our requirements, here are some perks/cash/etc we are adding to your pay package".
                    It is true that ANY employee can be replaced. However, how much is the company willing at absorb in terms of lost productivity, training, and general delays from the normal startup time that it takes for a new hire to get an understanding of the setup to the point that they are NOT dangerous? management tends to forget that....
                regards
                dave mundt

      --
      YAB - http://blog.beemandave.com/
    15. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      I hope one day when you fire 500 people so that your can afford a new personal jet each employee comes up and takes turn punching you in your fat face.

      Agreed. While I was with a past employer, they had a massive surprise layoff in the production department. They had to hire security because of all the threats they got from angry but hard-working married people.

      My own boss, in the repair department, later gave me a month's warning in advance that I was going to be laid off. He even let me take the rest of the day off that day, for pay. The repair department was to be outsourced across the country so we could get faster turnaround, and it was now my job to train the people who were taking over for me.

      I was elated to have been treated so well. I busted my ass hard for the company and was extended 4 times before I was finally laid off.

    16. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is absolutely true.

      Unless the manager knows the company will go bankrupt if they fire you, they'll kill the company rather than admit you are irreplaceable.
      I've seen companies pay a million bucks to PROVE that a $50k employee wasn't irreplaceable.

      Your best option is do your best and FAIL at the web server jobs because you don't have those skills.
      You absolutely don't want to be the IT person at a company like that. You'll be working nights, weekends and holidays while everyone else is drinking at the bar partying.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    17. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by suomynonAyletamitlU · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You think you're irreplaceable?

      I think every time I post a new position I get 100 candidates more qualified than your dumbass.

      I'm going to take a stab in the dark and say either this is an exaggeration by 50-100x, or you really have no way to tell who's qualified for the position. No, he isn't irreplaceable. However, HR managers who believe that good employees (as opposed to line workers) are, in fact, replaceable, are going to send their business into the gutter. Because, frankly, the existence of replacements doesn't mean that YOU will find one.

      Because I get the feeling you aren't working for a company everyone wants to work at--not Google or some amazing game studio or anything else really fun. So they won't be coming to you. That means that pretty much every resume you'll get is just someone looking for "a job, any job." Those applicants are not going to be the five-star workers. Probably not even three-star. However, what you're asking for is someone who's at least 3-4 stars, like the submitter claims to be--hard working, competent, learns fast, trying to be professional, actually getting things done, has proven himself, and who has clearly become the go-to guy for these sorts of things.

      You don't want a prima donna. Got it. And GP's grandstanding is pretty assholeish. However, if it was you who was in charge of his living or dying, he would be justified in his assholishness (if not in his method), because I'm pretty sure you wouldn't pay him what he was worth. And guess what? Between the two of you, you'll probably be the one who's wrong. Now, maybe the GP is really just trolling businesses and doesn't know Jack Schitt. On the other hand, what he suggested could easily come naturally--because in the big push before a launch, people can get burned out and actually need that kind of incentive to stay instead of being reamed up the ass. And all you just did was screw him out of both fair pay for his current work, and future employment. Thanks.

    18. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and, you think YOU are irreplaceable? Unless you are the owner, you are just one among a million nickel-a-dozen "delusional dumbass" manager...

    19. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by beakerMeep · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm sorry but he's right. He said it in a horribly tactless way, but to use a project launch as leverage is to show that you're manipulative and not a team player. These are people you have to continue to work with and they will never trust you again.

      If he were to go to management and say "hey I am over-utilized, I would like a raise or a subordinate or just help from peers or SOMETHING; otherwise we might miss launch DESPITE my best efforts, (with documentation showing how much he is overworking) -- that would be a different story.

      It's all about how you say it, are you in it for the long haul? Do they know that? Are you polite, willing to be flexible? Are you bringing the problem to THEIR attention with some suggested solutions and letting them decide?

      Some situations will never be resolvable as one side or the other just doesn't care or wont budge. But most can be solved quite amicably to both sides with a little forethought and common courtesy.

      Also, one thing to remember is that if you are going to convince someone you are over-booked, you need to tell them that each time they add an assignment to your plate, else they will continue to push you to your limits (which is not always a bad thing).

      --
      meep
    20. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you would advocate keeping around the asshole who blackmailed your company? Do you not realize that he'd do it again the next time there was an important deadline, and again every time after that? And he won't be the only one. He's not firing people because of the money, he's firing people because of the bad attitude.

    21. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by publiclurker · · Score: 1

      Funny how two faced hypocrites like you don't have any problems with companies blackmailing theirm employees.

    22. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by acoustix · · Score: 1

      I think you misread Chevman's post. He didn't say he'd fire anyone who asked for a raise; he said he'd fire someone who used blackmail to get a raise. He didn't say anything about whether he would reward those people who do a good job.

      I don't think you know what the word "blackmail" means.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    23. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a manager, as long as i get a nice car allowance and get to nick off early on a friday to go hit up the driving range, i honestly couldn't give a rat's ass. all i need is a small pool of people i can fire occasionally in response to any poor performance on my dept's behalf and an intern with nice tits and i'm sorted.

    24. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you speak like a corporate drone
      do you believe to shit that is spewing out of your mouth ?

    25. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bingo, we have a winner.

      OP, start hitting the job ads, no matter what happens the situation is hopeless for you.

    26. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Xacid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think you hit on a key thing with "If he were to go to management and say "hey I am over-utilized, I would like a raise or a subordinate or just help from peers or SOMETHING; otherwise we might miss launch DESPITE my best efforts, (with documentation showing how much he is overworking) -- that would be a different story".

      Sometimes a payraise simply isn't the solution. I'd approach it in the manner of like "listen, we've got to do SOMETHING. Pay me so I can justify working 60-80 hours a week or relieve me of some of these duties with a new employee or shift some of it to an existing employee. The manager's job is to support you and to make sure the job gets done. If you approach it in terms of "I have a problem, can you help me fix this?" then you're off on the right foot.

      But also realize- sometimes there are inflexible employers who either poorly budgeted or simply don't have enough foresight to realize the value of their people. However, I as a small business owner know absolutely that my people are my number 1 asset. If I can't afford to pay someone more, but I know they're worth it then I'll at least explain why (typically a lack of steady work) and offer for them to proactive with helping us find new work. In essence it becomes - "help me help you". But then again - in a larger corporate environment you'd have more to worry about if they're having trouble finding steady work which raises a whole different slew of issues.

    27. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personal jet acquisition costs are so low these days that one only need fire approximately 25 people. Then, probably about 10 more per year to keep it operating. So, given ongoing variable and fixed costs, 500 people should be *very roughly* equivalent to about 40 years worth of personal jet operation (not counting inflation).

    28. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by DeadDecoy · · Score: 1

      but to use a project launch as leverage is to show that you're manipulative and not a team player.

      I highly agree with this statement. If you want a raise, you should do it at the beginning of a project, not the end. Otherwise, from your bosses perspective, it's kinda like renegotiating the price after they've paid the agreed-upon price tag. However, However, I feel its sufficiently diplomatic to ask for more resources that will help move the project along. If your being overworked, it helps to communicate what you can do and what resources you need to reach the agreed upon goal. If you agree upon a schedule and provide progress reports, your boss can gauge the effort your making and decide whether your worth it or need more help. Beyond that, it's a question of how much you enjoy your work. If your not happy and management doesn't give you the resources to do your job, it wouldn't be a bad idea to work somewhere else.
      I suspect if anyone is working up to 80 hours, they're either paid a decent amount, not managing expectations very well, or a masochist.

    29. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Xacid · · Score: 1

      You sound like someone who hasn't worked in the real world as a manager.

    30. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know this is is slashdot and everyone who can half-ass a LAMP setup and update the WordPress thinks they are a irreplaceable "five star" technical superstud. But the reality is most of you people are barely competent despite your high opinions of yourself.

      You can easily get hundreds of replies to craigslist post for this type of work, the biggest difficulty is picking the peanuts out of all the shit.

      And come on, the OP gets paid for posting on facebook. It's an entry-level job at best.

    31. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Emugamer · · Score: 1

      you are one of those people that justifies your position with "But I interviewed 100 people each month for the last 3 months!"

    32. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is just basic human psychology, you asperger retard.

    33. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by ktappe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sorry but he's right. He said it in a horribly tactless way, but to use a project launch as leverage is to show that you're manipulative and not a team player. These are people you have to continue to work with and they will never trust you again.

      He didn't fire the first shot, his employer did. They used the economic downturn and his goodwill to dump huge quantities of additional responsibility on him without any compensation. All he is doing is returning fire and all power to him. Honestly, if they treat him like this now odds are he'll get laid off after project launch anyway, as they are treating him as disposable. So he might as well get his pay now 'cos he sure won't get it later.

      It's always so fun when people only see employers' side of things. And then those same people cannot fathom why unions exist.

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    34. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by ktappe · · Score: 1

      I think you misread Chevman's post. He didn't say he'd fire anyone who asked for a raise; he said he'd fire someone who used blackmail to get a raise. He didn't say anything about whether he would reward those people who do a good job.

      I don't think you know what the word "blackmail" means.

      Strongly agreed. "Blackmail" requires illegality. This is a completely legal contract negotiation. The employer broke the original agreement by adding responsibilities and the employee is now in a position of having the choice of whether to continue to honor his end of the contract or hold out for a new one. The latter is not "blackmail".

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    35. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by ktappe · · Score: 1

      You think you're irreplaceable?

      I think every time I post a new position I get 100 candidates more qualified than your dumbass.

      I'm going to take a stab in the dark and say either this is an exaggeration by 50-100x, or you really have no way to tell who's qualified for the position.

      Pretty sure it's the latter. It's true that every advertised position these days garners thousands of resumes. But that's obviously not the whole story, for most of the candidates are not qualified. I work for a Fortune 10 company and we are having trouble filling some spots not because of lack of candidates but because people either are unqualified or do not show up for interviews (or, in some cases, don't show up for their first day of work.) It is really disturbing how many of the 9.7% of unemployed workers out there are unemployed because they don't know their ass from a hole in the ground--it implies to me that our unemployment rate is going to stay high for a while due to severe education deficiencies in the recent past. It's disheartening.

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    36. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Nadaka · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Been There. Done That. You are right.

      It is not time to ask for a raise and a title. It is time to find someone else to work for. Go ahead and ask for the title without the raise, so that you can put it on your resume.

    37. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Surt · · Score: 1

      I see the same thing, albeit at a much smaller company. We get thousands of very shiny resumes, from people with all sorts of checklist talents, who apparently actually possess none of them. We have about a 150 (fully qualified!) resumes : 1 hire ratio right now, and things are getting worse.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    38. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      to use a project launch as leverage is to show that you're manipulative and not a team player.

      Agreed. Always use project launches to demonstrate a lack of team playing. Walking out the door three days before a release really gets the point across.

    39. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by erroneus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's true -- the respect MUST go both ways. If it doesn't you were screwed before you asked the question. I get the feeling the original topic poster is just seeking confirmation that he should look elsewhere... and as they say, it is easier to find a job when you already have one than not. So start looking.

      Also, the company shows all the signs of immanent collapse. You should be looking for another job for that reason alone. I have seen a lot of companies failing in much the same ways. I once worked for a company who was paying their employees from investment capital when they were supposed to be running a stable business. I knew the money would run out before long... it did.

    40. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by coolgeek · · Score: 1

      Well, that certainly is an accountant's perspective. You have to look at it as an investment. Yes, it costs more to replace one guy who is bucking the status quo and demanding a raise. The time to ask for such a raise is after launch and after some money starts coming in, not as a form of blackmail to get the business through a critical phase. It turns the table on who is the "bad guy" in the negotiation, and besides, after things start flying, the employee probably has more leverage because management is probably up to their eyes in work. Anyway, the investment for the company is in showing everyone else what is going to happen to them unless they shut the fuck up and start working their asses off. That is probably worth 5-10x the extra expense you cite. I believe in rewarding my people for their hard work, not for their pitiful power plays.

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
    41. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by kklein · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is exactly how you handle this kind of thing.

      The last time it happened to me (I was leading a small team who was asked to do more and more--and then kept getting flak for things falling through the cracks), I had my folks document--conservatively--how much time was being spent on tasks. It was a simple case of the management just plain not knowing how many intermediary steps there were between "do this" and "it's done."

      I brought this material to a private meeting with my boss, explained our situation earnestly, and provided documentation of what we were doing. I made it very clear that we actually agreed that much of this stuff needed to get done, but that there physically wasn't enough man power or time to do it. I told him that some of my best people were looking to leave, and explained how much we--the company--would suffer if we let that happen. I then just basically said "Something's got to give. We need to take one of these projects and re-assign it or we need to be pulled off something, or we need more hands." I didn't bring money up at all, because money doesn't even mean anything when you physically cannot complete the tasks in front of you.

      Anyway, it went well. He very honestly didn't know what was going on, and appreciated that I approached it from a "we have a problem, and here are some ideas on fixing it" standpoint, not a "this is bullshit and you fucking suck" standpoint (although that was the standpoint we often had amongst ourselves.).

      If that doesn't work, if the response is "Well, buddy, I'm sorry, but that's life in the big city with the big boys in the big company, and this stuff has to get done" then remember that "this stuff" is not "your stuff." You're an employee. The owners need this stuff done; you need money. That's all. You have no relationship with "this stuff."

      I agree that you should never threaten your employer. These are people, and even when they're incompetent, they're just normal folks. You pull a dick move and they aren't going to like it. You're shooting yourself in the foot. You might get the raise, but it also might be the last one you ever get. Being liked/respected by your organizational superiors makes things a lot easier in life. Don't be a dick. Be a team player.

    42. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Xeno+man · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What about the other way? Your boss has hired you to build a shed but by the time the project is done your building a mansion and they haven't giving you any more resources to do so. That shows that management is manipulative hiring a guy to to a job but then over time they can get job b, c and d as well for free.

      The best way is to do some research on who is hiring some one to do what your doing and what they are offering or how many people they need to hire to do what your doing. 3 guys at 40k a year to replace you sure makes your 10% increase request look very reasonable.

    43. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry but he's right. He said it in a horribly tactless way, but to use a project launch as leverage is to show that you're manipulative and not a team player. These are people you have to continue to work with and they will never trust you again.

      if management was doing its job, he wouldn't be overloaded in the first place.

      If he were to go to management and say "hey I am over-utilized, I would like a raise or a subordinate or just help from peers or SOMETHING; otherwise we might miss launch DESPITE my best efforts, (with documentation showing how much he is overworking) -- that would be a different story.

      it's the job of management to monitor and adapt employee workloads.. it's not their job to sit there like royalty while employees beg for mercy.

      It's all about how you say it, are you in it for the long haul? Do they know that? Are you polite, willing to be flexible? Are you bringing the problem to THEIR attention with some suggested solutions and letting them decide?

      same deal here. I'm not paid manager level salary, so why shoudl I do his job AND mine?

      Also, one thing to remember is that if you are going to convince someone you are over-booked, you need to tell them that each time they add an assignment to your plate, else they will continue to push you to your limits (which is not always a bad thing).

      it is when today's 120% is tomorrow's 100%.

    44. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by coolgeek · · Score: 1

      Well you seem to totally lack any understanding about what it is like bootstrapping a business. Your characterization of them treating him as "disposable" really assumes a lot.

      It could be that the bosses don't have anything extra to pay him or hire more people. They may be covering their personal expenses with the second they pulled on their homes.

      It really depends on the situation, but waiting and asking for more money, or a bonus, when there is actually money available to fulfill such a request can be very advantageous. It really depends on the ownership of the company. Some people will reward loyalty with lots of cash, when the cash is available.

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
    45. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, technically, if you have to know, yes, I'm kinda irreplacable. Last time I checked there are about 5 people on this marble we call Earth that have the set of skills I can offer. Granted, there's also only a market for about 500, but you can probably see that there's not always "100 candidates per job". Sometimes, you have 100 jobs per candidate. Or, in other terms... I probably make more money than you. And I don't even have to play golf to get it.

      But let's assume I'm replacable. Yes, you can fire me. And hire someone else. Who will need about 1-3 months to get "into" the job, depending on his skill level. If he is one of the few people who can pick up an IT job made for 4 people in just 1 month, expect to pay him WELL. After that time, he could become productive. After that time, though, he usually also finds out that you're essentially underpaying him, because he has the workload of four people to carry on a one person paycheck. So there's two possible outcomes: He's either also asking for more money or he finds something better without first asking for more money. Either way, you're again looking for someone who will, again, need 1-3 months to get into the game.

      The idea of hire and fire has NEVER worked well in IT. IT ain't bricklaying or plumbing. It's not "you've done it once, you do the same here". You never do the same job in two different companies. Even if they happen to have essentially the same goals. You will never be able to "plug and play" someone. And you can utterly forget it when it comes to development.

      In other words, yes, you can easily hire someone else. If you can handle the lost output of about a quarter. Always provided that you don't fall for someone only claiming to have the skills you want and HR being too stupid to weed out the duds.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    46. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by coolgeek · · Score: 1

      There are many forms of blackmail, beside the criminal type. All but saying "pay me or I'm gonna screw your launch by walking out" is a form of blackmail. Not criminal blackmail, but blackmail nonetheless. It is "give me money or suffer consequences". Perhaps "extortion" is a synonym you might find more palatable.

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
    47. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by coolgeek · · Score: 1

      You think you're irreplaceable?

      I think every time I post a new position I get 100 candidates more qualified than your dumbass.

      And every single one of them wants triple what you're currently paying.

      Because if they were more qualified and willing to work for the same amount, you'd be replacing your current employee.

      Sure, who doesn't want 3x as much? In this economy, they will probably work for 75% of the prima donna they just fired, because after months of interviews, they know they aren't going to do much better, and some income is better than no income.

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
    48. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by ralphdaugherty · · Score: 1

      The fact of the matter is that these are high-tech jobs that require a great deal of skill and knowledge.

            I didn't see anything high tech in what he described. Making sure the programmer is on course, I need a new title for that? Give me a freaking break.

        rd

    49. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      it is not like hiring a new backhoe operator, where pretty much every backhoe works the same

      Don't sell skilled tradespeople short. The ability to feel something's not right and avoid ripping out that unmarked underground gas main isn't something every backhoe operator has. Ditto for when it's safe to open-trench, and when you need to use a trench box. Or close-in work on buried electrical lines, with people standing next to the bucket.

    50. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Ironpoint · · Score: 1

      "Unless the manager knows the company will go bankrupt if they fire you, they'll kill the company rather than admit you are irreplaceable."

      This piece of wisdom is hard fought for and very valuable. Greenhorns sometimes think that managers will do whatever is in the best interest of the company, and that is far from true. It takes a half dozen projects before this can really be seen.

      A better option is to plan on changing jobs at fixed intervals. Irreplaceable doesn't work because managers can talk up a project they killed long enough to find another job.

    51. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Whoa, in that case that 50k bucks guy should be glad he got out before that company collapse could be blamed on him. Nobody wants to be the one to turn off the lights in a company, you might have to admit that you're the one who broke their back.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    52. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by mysidia · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm sorry but he's right. He said it in a horribly tactless way, but to use a project launch as leverage is to show that you're manipulative and not a team player.

      In other words, he'd be perfect in management?

      If he uses the project as leverage, he's cold and manipulative. If he doesn't, he's a fool, perfect candidate to be manipulated by management into increasingly many job duties, with no improvement in pay, or recognition for performance.

      You think companies believe that being manipulative is bad?

      Companies exist to manipulate their prospective customers to buy product from them

    53. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's actually the big problem. And the more qualification you require (not because you think it's cute to have a triple-PhD changing your lightbulbs, but because they're utterly worthless if they don't have the qualification), the worse it gets.

      As a former boss of mine said "There's three qualifications for this job: Good. Available. No pertinent convictions. Pick two. You can't get three." It's very true. For some jobs you just cannot find fitting people. And WHEN you finally get an applicant, you may rest assured that he fits into the "cute, but clueless" drawer. Oh, there's billions of people out there who can slap together a web page, and hey, they can do JavaScript. Why not apply for a job where they ask for intimate knowledge of IA32 assembler? Wikipedia said it's a programming language and, hey, programming is programming, right?

      *facepalm*

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    54. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by mysidia · · Score: 1

      And your attitude is the exact reason why I'm leaving I/T if I can do it. People who work their ass off should be rewarded and NOT replaced. Why? Because if you reward them and keep them they'll work their ass off for you AGAIN and AGAIN.

      Yes... but do the shareholders make more money if you reward them, or more money if you replace them with someone new, who will work their ass off for you, until the same thing happens?

      Sure, they leave once they are not rewarded. But a company can keep doing this over and over again... for every new employee, it will be the first time, and they won't know ahead of time that there is no reward awaiting them at the end.

    55. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by SecurityGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This isn't quite as nuts as it reads.

      If you, dear reader, aren't really very good at your job and are paid well already, yeah, sit down and do your job. You're already paid fairly.

      If, however the OP's assertions are true and he was hired for one job and is now doing 2 or 3 others capably and at a rate far below market, any manager that acts this way deserves a one way ticket to the street.

      Look, realistically appropriate pay is whatever is reasonable to the parties involved. If you get a genius right out of high school who can do the work of three senior guys for peanuts, you're not going to pay him $150k. Period. He's thrilled to get a lot less. If you've got a guy who is doing $120,000 worth of work and wants to make more than $40,000, you're a flat dumbass if you don't give him a raise. He'll probably be thrilled to get $50,000 and you're still $70,000 in the black.

      FWIW, been there done that. Asked for a well justified raise and didn't get it. I think they offered me 8% or so. I left and doubled my salary.

      Honestly, if you're that good have a casual conversation and feel the company out. If they're not going to do anything for you, leave. By the way, dear manager, that's the equivalent of firing you, and bad managers are the #1 reason people leave.

    56. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Except (probably) there is no contract between the two parties that limits either side's obligations.

      It's not extortion, because the employer wants a service from the employee, the nature of buying a service from someone ordinarily means the employee will receive cash compensation, and the employee has a right to specify what price they will demand, to do business.

    57. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Maybe not. Maybe you were not advertising for the position at the time.

      If any person in an organization is completely irreplaceable at any point in time, someone in management needs to be disciplined harshly, for allowing that to happen.

    58. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Teamplayer? He is the team.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    59. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't, he just meant that if you hire someone who was a great backhoe operator at company A, he will almost certainly also be such in your company and needing little if any time to adjust.
      Whereas even the most brilliant and experienced IT person might need a few months to be able to run things properly in your company.

    60. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by xmundt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Greetings and Salutations...
                Haw! I KNEW that when I wrote that line, I was going to get a response like this. Please note that my point was VERY NARROWLY focused on the controls of the backhoe...not the job as a whole. I have a great deal of respect for the skilled trades-person, as they can be craftsmen of the first order. I have seen (and happily paid) heavy equipment operators who have been able to manipulate their machines with the delicacy and accuracy of a surgeon's scalpel. And, since I have a fair number of hours on a backhoe myself, I am VERY aware of the challenges of that sort of task.
                  However...to my broader point...how did those artists GET to that point? Partly from a natural gift, I am sure...but MOSTLY through years of seat time manipulating those levers and moving that earth. I am also QUITE sure that every one of those artists will have a story or two of when they were a newbe, and, how they produced some pretty impressive disasters by digging in the wrong place, or mis-judging the stability of their tool. We are all there at one time....and it takes time to get that level of skill.
                Regards
                Dave Mundt

      --
      YAB - http://blog.beemandave.com/
    61. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by spd_rcr · · Score: 1

      Gotta agree with this.
      Any time the business is cutting jobs around you while expanding, management's already gone horribly wrong.
      Just try for a better job title and get your responsibilities (job description sorted out).
      If you're useful, hardworking, and not a total douche, you'll always be able to find another job.

      --
      - tensions in our lives that are attacking our minds, unite themselves together to make our consciousness blind - op'ivy
    62. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by JakiChan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When people say "not a team player" in this context what it really means is that they won't overwork themselves in order to increase the value for equity holders. In other words, they aren't willing to give you what you haven't paid for.

      Unless you have a huge equity stake then don't bother being a "team player". Because your "coach" will cut you from the team without a second thought. One way loyalty isn't loyalty.

      --
      "Where quality is like a dead stinking rat - you just can't miss it."
    63. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact of the matter is that these are high-tech jobs that require a great deal of skill and knowledge.

      Thanks for this throwback post to the dot-com era of 1999. The truth is that IT jobs are really not any more specialized than any other corporate function.

      And,, if anything, it is just the opposite. Other positions have formal qualifications and education programs, while IT is still the domain of the craft-worker, which makes it highly attractive to bullshitters on all sides. Look at the OP as an example. He was tasked with all sorts of IT work out of the blue, but he would never in a million years be told to operate a backhoe.

    64. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Agree. You are almost always in a better position to negotiate with a perfect stranger than you are with existing terms. Case in point, I was being paid 65K (near entry level) for about 1 year and took on many more responsibilities for the company. I received roughly a 10% increase. Which, comparatively speaking, is a big raise for your average clock puncher. I left the company and negotiated a 100k position. That's a 54% raise. Not something my previous employer would have done. I knew the position he was in, and he was willing to replace me with two other individuals, and didn't want a guy who valued himself at 54% raises on a yearly basis. And yes, similar sweatshop conditions with company A. The new company, I work 40-50 hours a week (instead of the 60-70 prior). Corner office, and they give me a big hammer and anvil. My answer: Quit graciously.

    65. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by jmcvetta · · Score: 1

      In this economy, they will probably work for 75% of the prima donna they just fired, because after months of interviews, they know they aren't going to do much better, and some income is better than no income.

      You seem to have a rather imaginative idea of how hard it is for skilled people to find jobs in "this economy". For better or worse -- certainly worse for society, and most likely worse for you personally -- recessions do not have equal impact on all classes of workers.

    66. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When your qualifications require things that aren't required for the job, it's easy to find that everyone is unqualified.

      eg: Requiring post-secondary education for a job which neither legally or even to save face requires it. This usually applies to almost all IT positions.

      eg #2: Requiring a mix of experience and formal education that is extremely unlikely. Such as requiring university level education including classes explaining .net products, and 10 years IT experience.

      eg #3: Requiring multidisciplinary education/experience for a single discipline job. For example, requiring java/php/assembler/ee knowledge to maintain a smaller company's servers.

      eg #4: Requiring zero past convictions when your job neither legally requires it and neither do your customers, such as expecting the screwdriver geek assembling your systems to have never been convicted of a sex crime, so you don't even consider the guy that was caught peeing in a fountain when he was 16 and drunk.

      I could go on, I've seen it all and it's idiotic. You want these things? Be prepared to pay the $200k a year that goes along with it. Or be prepared to get the guy who shows up to work every other Wednesday.

      Companies need to start considering every resume they receive that passes the absolute most basic requirements for the job, and then sort them by likelihood of being a quality employee. Then you get good labour at a decent rate, and you have more than 2 candidates to choose from.

    67. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by raicesrasta · · Score: 1

      " That shows that management is manipulative hiring a guy to to a job but then over time they can get job b, c and d as well for free. " That shows that you let yourself be managed. Managing is all about manipulation, so yes management is manipulative. If you are hired to build a shed, and by the end you build a mansion, it's because you chose to. I think it's too late for a raise now. Stick to the other suggestions. Next time, as soon as you are told to do something you were not hired for, then ask for a raise. In the end, they are supposedly paying you what you were hired for, and if you are going to do something else, they should pay for that too.

    68. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by CAIMLAS · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No kidding.

      And given the original poster's words, it would appear this is a "small company". Chances are he was initially hired as a stand in or for a limited role/limited responsibility, and they hit hard times. He was hired as an "Online Content Writer" (whatever the fuck that is) and is, in essence, a "tech writer".

      This is a job the vast majority of technically inclined people could perform - yet not everyone (nevermind the majority of tech writers) can come close to hacking the other responsibilities he's been able to put under his belt. If he's not gotten any raise at all, chances are he's "vastly underpaid", and there's little chance they could find someone to fill his shoes at all - never mind anywhere near his salary.

      I've seen these job postings. They go something like this (I'm sure you've seen them, too):


      Wanted: IT Professional

      Must be proficient in Microsoft Office, Visio, Sharepoint, Powerpoint, etc.

      Successful candidate will be responsible for routine documentation of our entire product line. Weekly articles for online publication will also be necessary.

      Must have 2-3+ years administering Windows desktops and Linux servers. Must be comfortable with the full range of server maintenance tasks.

      Familiar with phone, fax, etc. systems.

      Candidate must be comfortable with the occasional off-hour call.

      Successful candidate will spend the majority of his time in a customer-facing environment. We are looking for a people person!

      Salary: $35-40k with generous medical benefits!*

      *which you will have to pay for yourself out of your salary. Expect 50-80h work weeks and, between the tech support and meetings, you won't have enough time for your core responsibilities. But we won't disclose this; you'll have to relocate, first.

      Only desperate people apply for these jobs; competent people will be looking for too much levity: either in pay, or professional (and personal) courtesy. As a result, they won't be hired.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    69. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not "give me money or suffer consequences", it's "I will no longer do more work than I am being paid for". It's pretty twisted to interpret that as extortion.

    70. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The fact of the matter is that these are high-tech jobs that require a great deal of skill and knowledge.

      And it repeatedly hits me in the face like a brick when I see that people outside IT not only don't realize this, but think it's easy. "Could you have this done by $time?" -> "No. That'll take $time x3, if I'm doing nothing else. How about $later_time?"

      Yet, if the coin is flipped, I have seen "support professionals" (of the higher grade range, which also do other things), dept. managers, business managers, clerical/accountant types, and the like all replaced in function by IT folks. On a couple occasions I've seen IT people shore up the accountant position in addition to their duties.

      IT is Hard - and such a statement is akin to saying "Engineering is Hard". I'd not want an EE anywhere near bridge design, network/system design, or the like. Maybe municipal water system design. However: the point is that these are not mutually inclusive disciplines any more than astronauts and brain surgeons are. Similar starting point (necessary "infrastructure" capacity within the individual), different endpoint.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    71. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Krahar · · Score: 1

      If you are going to interpret this as "give me money or suffer consequences", and saying that is extortion, then almost every single situation involving money exchanging hands is extortion. Saying "I'll work for you if you pay me" almost always also means "I won't work for you if you don't pay me." That is negotiation.

    72. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      "And your attitude is the exact reason why I'm leaving I/T if I can do it. People who work their ass off should be rewarded and NOT replaced. Why? Because if you reward them and keep them they'll work their ass off for you AGAIN and AGAIN."

      In a severe recession the employer can always find someone better and cheaper than you and there is nothing you can do about it. Outsourcing started this but other professions are being treated the same and even secure jobs such as teachers and policemen are turning into because of recession related budget cuts. In Louisiana all the new teaching hires are flown in from South America and this is happening while 300,000 teachers are being laid off nationwide.

      The only light at the end of the tunnel are the managers who do this will find their good workers leaving when the economy rebounds (it may not in the U.S.) . Owning you're own business is the only way to avoid this. You will be disappointed leaving I.T. as everyone is being replaced by cheaper foreign, H1B1, and even the 20 million unemployed. More than likely they will have years of experience in the field you want to get into.

      Start your own business if you have the means to do it.

      Just remember,you are always replaceable when at work and bust your butt off. The corporations are the ones calling the shots for the time being.

    73. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Vectormatic · · Score: 2, Informative

      It could be that the bosses don't have anything extra to pay him or hire more people.

      In which case the business is likely going down, and you are better of finding that out through a raise-negotiation, then by showing up to a locked down office with a "closed due to bankrupcy" note on the door...

      If you go about a raise-negotiation politely (dont start with demanding X percent), it can end in three ways:
      1) No, sorry we simply cant afford it, even though you took over much more work
      2) No, and pack up your stuff, you are fired
      3) Yes, figures to be discussed

      One could argue that in cases 1 and 2, you are better of getting out of there anyway, in case 1 you might soon be out of a job anyway, in case 2 it is very doubtfull you would want to work for people like this.

      this all is assuming that you are paid under 'market-value' for what your tasks actually are, so it is probably very wise to look around a bit first. It will help you make a well-funded argument for the raise, and a realistic demand, and will help you find a job much faster when shit goes pear-shaped

      --
      People, what a bunch of bastards
    74. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Its an act of sabotage. Whether its legal or not is up to the courts. Even if that manger sounded like a jerk it works both ways. Remember the employer has a right to terminate as well if it is unhappy with the relationship or work. I would fire such an employee even if what the employee did was legal or in a verbal contract. A raise is negotiable, and so is determining the value of work he or she provides. However, if its being used at that particular time it certainly is not. The same is true for any vendor or any other business I want to deal with. There are many sharks out there.

      It's fun to think of such things at work but I would not advise anyone to do it unless you know what you are doing.

    75. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by mysidia · · Score: 1

      A raise is negotiable, and so is determining the value of work he or she provides. However, if its being used at that particular time it certainly is not.

      Oh, it is most certainly negotiable at all times. And at 1 month before launch of something, the work being done is much more valuable, and so the scales are tipped highly in favor of the employee, for any negotiation. In other words, it is the perfect time.

      Whereas, if the employee had waited until a week after the launch, for that negotiation, the scales would be tipped highly against the employee.

      So the logical thing for the employee to do is demand the raise a month before launch, and get the raise.

      The logical thing for the employer to do is to award them the raise (assuming it costs them less for the near term than it would cost to replace them).

      As soon as the launch is done with, the logical thing for the employer to do is demand a meeting with the employee, and re-negotiate their salary, based on the new value of their work, since the launch is no longer imminent.

      In other words, they effectively got a raise 1 month before launch, and then get a drop in compensation afterwards, since there's no 'imminent project'

      Also, the new salary might be less than the original salary was, to offset the increased amount that was paid to them, during that prior month.

    76. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Whats the name of your company? I am sure many slashdotters can and are willing. The only jobs I see that are hiring are fast food and grocery stores where I am at. There are many entry level college students as well that can not find a job. If you are willing to train you can find some very motivated people fresh out of school.

    77. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I am not a lawyer but I was under the impression that its illegal to lower someone's salary after hiring unless its agreed upon in writing. Even that is very shaky legal grounds.

      What you say is true but the value is not worth it after the launch. It is short term only and reason to be fired. I would document all the work I had done and ask for a raise after the launch. A good employer will see this and it is unethical to backstab. I do admit his employer does not sound like a good one. You would be mad if your employer lowered your salary after finding out that the economy is bad or demand 80 hours a week when they know you are hurting financially.

      People do this and its a pet peeve for many managers. Most will not want to do business again with such employees as they will have too much power and can do fast one on you when you least expect it.

    78. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Happens in this country as well and by anyone. Annoying as shit and there are no winners. But dammit I'll always be the thorn in the side when management does this. One bad one is getting the message.

      I want the rest of us to be professionals. Not suckers at the teat of privilege.

    79. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what part of the economy you're located in, but in the Bay-Area tech sector, it's hard enough to find tech employees that companies are still paying recruiting bonuses, and a few that had ditched them during the recession have reinstituted them.

    80. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zynga, is that you? It sure sounds like you.

      At any rate, if - as a manager - you've ever wondered why your turnover rate is so high, I believe your own post there supplies the answer.

      On the flipside: if you've never wondered or cared about turnover you may wish to consider a career change to something better suited to your talents, as management may not be right for you.

    81. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by geoskd · · Score: 1

      What about the other way? Your boss has hired you to build a shed but by the time the project is done your building a mansion and they haven't giving you any more resources to do so. That shows that management is manipulative hiring a guy to to a job but then over time they can get job b, c and d as well for free.

      That is the very definition of what a manager is expected to do. They are hired to maximize return on investment. If a manager doesn't save the company at least as much as his/her own salary, then he/she isn't doing his/her job, or his/her job needs to be eliminated. In many cases, doing that job means eliminating inefficiencies, but it almost always means pushing their employees as far as they will allow.

      -=Geoskd

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    82. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Businesses tend to reward incompetent, psychopathic managers. At my job they require off the clock work, regularly screw up the pay checks, allow overt bullying and cook up reasons to fire people. It's not the only place I've worked which behaves in that fashion, but in this economy businesses think they can get away with it. So they do counting on the employees not to do anything about it. My manager just about shit a brick when he caught me clocking in the way that state law requires. The money didn't show up on my paycheck and I assume that as soon as the payroll discrepancy form goes through that I'll be fired. But damn it, I'm going to love owning a yacht when they're forced to settle with my attorney.

    83. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Actually depending upon the company they often times end up being rewarded for preventing a lot of costly benefits from being earned. Sucks, but it's true, and it's definitely not something that a company with any potential at all does. Companies that cost cut to increase their margin invariably end up being bought by somebody else. And because there's a lot of idiots out there that believe in growth, companies never really go under anymore and consequently incompetent managers can spin it as something positive to be bought out. Rather than just being a few more customers and maybe some cheap equipment for the new owners.

    84. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by geoskd · · Score: 1

      And your attitude is the exact reason why I'm leaving I/T if I can do it. People who work their ass off should be rewarded and NOT replaced. Why? Because if you reward them and keep them they'll work their ass off for you AGAIN and AGAIN.

      It's not how hard you did or did not work, nor how competent you are that elicited that response. Incidentally, you would get that type of a response from pretty much all but the most extraordinary managers. You got that response because of how you approached the problem. There isn't a manager in the world who wants a self-important egomaniac on their staff. That kind of employee is a real massive waste of time to handle, and when you start talking about wasting your managers time, you are talking about your own time *plus* their time, so the cost adds up fast. Any manager who didn't severely punish that behavior fast would be up to their ass in trouble from every single employee they have. There isn't any employee in any company who isn't worth more to the company than they are being paid, otherwise the company wouldn't retain them at all. Taking advantage of that situation as though it only applied to you will get you removed fast so that you can no longer threaten the company. As a Manager, if I ever get wind that an applicant ever pulled that kind of stunt, their application would go in the shit-can so fast it would leave a crater.

      On the other hand, if you came to me and stated, as others here have suggested, that there is a problem that I need to be aware of (Morale problems are very real problems too...), then my reaction is entirely different. Perhaps the company does not have the resources to accommodate your request, but more than likely something can be done. It all depends on your approach to the discussion. If you are hostile, then the conversation and reaction will be hostile. If your approach is a friendly, lets-solve-this-together approach, then the result will be in the same spirit.

      -=Geoskd

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    85. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, he understands, he's just rationalising his failure to have a good career. Its not because he sucks, he just doesn't want to be a corporate drone. I bet he calls everyone 'jocks' and 'hipsters' too.

    86. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to disagree with your view that the vast majority of techies could serve as tech writers. IMHO (25 years in the IT industry), very few techies (heck, very few people period) can write well enough to use them as content writers, at least not in North America. Finding someone who writes well is a notable event.

    87. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Only desperate people apply for these jobs; competent people will be looking for too much levity: either in pay, or professional (and personal) courtesy. As a result, they won't be hired.

      You are incorrect, and your salary range is way high. This job is targeted at India, and they would jump at it and ask "how high?"

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    88. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen, dirtbag. You're Nothing. NOTHING, I tell you. You're not some big executive who deserves Millions even if all he can do is drive the share prices into the ground. You're a grunt.

      Be grateful we pay you at all. And that we let you be a part of our Team and work here 7 days a week. Remember, nobody OWES you a job, so shut up, and get back to work, or we'll replace you with 2 illegal immigrants and an offshore third-world contractor.

      And by the way, we're letting 3 more people go next week and you'll be taking over their jobs too. Same pay rate, but we'll be expecting that "extra effort" that a good Team Player will step up to. You should be able to do it, just work an extra 15 hours a week, no overtime pay.

      Sorry we have to do this but those goddam socialists in the goddam gubmint won't lower our taxes anymore and the EVP of marketing wants a larger yacht.

    89. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      I owned several Case backhoes - 580, 680, 780, and I never had a "disaster", even when hopping into this to keep excavating a basement and loading the dumptrucks while the "real" operator went out to lunch. (I had been using the transit to guide him as to depth, etc).

      He came back from lunch, and his first shovelful, he whacked the side of the next dumptruck.

      Within a year, he had managed to flip it. Some people need supervision, no matter what their skill level.

    90. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people don't care how much you pay the team, they care how much they as individuals get paid.

    91. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If he were to go to management and say "hey I am over-utilized, I would like a raise or a subordinate or just help from peers or SOMETHING; otherwise we might miss launch DESPITE my best efforts, (with documentation showing how much he is overworking) -- that would be a different story.

      No, it would not be. It's a different way of saying the same thing: "I am overworked (you can stick your "utilized" buzzword someplace dark and euphemistic) and if you do not rectify the situation either by making me have less work or more money, I'm out of here because it's not worth it." Unless your manager is a complete fucking idiot he will be able to tell the difference between "I want a raise" to "I'm out of here if you don't fix this": absolutely nothing.

      It's all about how you say it, are you in it for the long haul? Do they know that? Are you polite, willing to be flexible? Are you bringing the problem to THEIR attention with some suggested solutions and letting them decide?

      Forget polite and willing to be flexible, all that is required is that you are professional. It is not professional to allow yourself to be overloaded. It is not professional to allow a company to take advantage of you.

      The simple truth is that any company which values you will not do this to you in the first place. If they overwork you they will offer you something up front. Your manager's job is to know what you can handle and to keep you busy, not to burn you out. Unless, of course, they're just trying to use you up, and don't give a shit about you. In those circumstances you can either do something about it or suffer.

      The business is using his need for currency as leverage to force him to do several jobs, why not use their need as leverage to get paid for doing those jobs? Some misplaced sense of loyalty?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    92. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by chialea · · Score: 1

      What about the other way? Your boss has hired you to build a shed but by the time the project is done your building a mansion and they haven't giving you any more resources to do so. That shows that management is manipulative hiring a guy to to a job but then over time they can get job b, c and d as well for free.
       

      That's certainly a possible explanation. Another possible explanation is that management hires people expecting them to grow and take on more duties, then ask for help when they need it. The difference is what happens when you go to management and ask for help. Your manager may honestly not know what you're doing or what you can handle. Really, it's the adult thing to do.

    93. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry we have to do this but those goddam socialists in the goddam gubmint won't lower our taxes anymore and the EVP of marketing wants a larger yacht.

      I know you're being ironic, but there is a real parallel here with this guy's situation...

      If this guy agreed to do lots more stuff and take less money, he's rolling over for someone else's benefit. This is almost exactly like what the federal government has done since the Reagan years - growth in programs (which benefit the corporate "bosses" as much or more than the working poor) and tax cuts making it necessary to borrow the money to pay for those programs. The technical term for this is mismanagement.

      Make no mistake, the current federal situation is as fucked up as it is because it benefits the "bosses," a.k.a. big business.

    94. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Just hiring people for shit like housework has made it abundantly clear to me that if you can hire someone trustworthy who does a half-assed job you have achieved 75% of all you could ever hope for. When I left Texas the snatch I paid to clean my apartment failed to do so and caused me to incur a substantial debt, for example. She was a real 0% employee. But she came highly recommended by the social community in which I participated. Clearly, hiring help is not easy.

      I never pad my resume with bullshit. Consequently my resume probably gets discarded often, or liberally ignored. It's not like the job offers I get from having it posted online are ever really something I can do, but headhunters don't care. But on the flip side, I always progress from a phone interview to an in-person one. At this point I have the luxury of seeking quality over quantity, so I don't have any compulsion to lie. I can only imagine, however, what it's like when you're trying to support a family and your credit is maxing out.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    95. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by genner · · Score: 1

      There are many forms of blackmail, beside the criminal type. All but saying "pay me or I'm gonna screw your launch by walking out" is a form of blackmail. Not criminal blackmail, but blackmail nonetheless. It is "give me money or suffer consequences". Perhaps "extortion" is a synonym you might find more palatable.

      The X makes it sound cool.

    96. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I am not a lawyer but I was under the impression that its illegal to lower someone's salary after hiring unless its agreed upon in writing. Even that is very shaky legal grounds.

      It may be uncommon for obvious reasons, under normal circumstances where the employee had not decided to play dirty it would normally be considered unfair, but as long as there is not an employment contract involved, an employer is legally empowered to lower their employee's salary, whenever they want, as long as they provide notifications before the work is performed, and they pay an amount that causes the total paid during the pay period to be at least as much as minimum wage.

      No consent from the employee is required for an employer legally reduce the rate of pay.

    97. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like someone who will take any BS from the real world management.

    98. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Other duties as assigned" should also include "Other resources as needed," but rarely it does. Too often a company is willing to let go of some people and give their projects and duties to other people while holding limits on overtime, physical resources, etc., constant. I've pointed out to one corporate CEO: Even Jesus was given resources for his miracles.

    99. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by nine-times · · Score: 1

      No, I think what he's saying is that the strategy reeks of extortion. If I were managing someone and I gave them more responsibilities and they said, "That's not part of my job. If you want to make it part of my job, then I want [some kind of additional compensation]." then I'd respect that. It's a negotiation.

      However, if I had the sense that the employee specifically waited until 1 month before launch and said, "More money or I quit and leave you high and dry." then I might very well fire him on the spot (unless I really couldn't, in which case I'd wait).

      I wouldn't use the term "team player", but the point is you can't trust people who try to extort money out of you, and I don't want employees that I can't trust.

    100. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by nine-times · · Score: 1

      And as a consultant...

      I'm sorry, but this is not the way to start a post. No one with any sense will listen to you after that.

    101. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by JamesP · · Score: 1

      Also, "talk is cheap"

      Go ahead, hire that guy that knows all the technologies there on his CV, see what happens.

      (I'm not complaining about the parent, rather, the GP the parent quotes)

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    102. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      1 month to launch? Sure, no problem, we'll give you a 10k per year raise. And then we'll show you the exit a week or two after launch.

      Sounds like a good way to end up having to contract with the guy for 5-10 times his previous wage to make inevitable changes and fixes.

      I think every time I post a new position I get 100 candidates more qualified than your dumbass.

      Oh, I get it. Anyone can just jump in and take over with no loss of time and resources. Then whatcha waitin' for? Nothing can possibly go wrong!

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    103. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by ajlisows · · Score: 1

      I think you have said it pretty well. I might add that in the time leading up to and after you do ask for/receive the raise/help/other you had better be seen working hard. All the time. If he spends half his time socializing, surfing the internet, and generally being unproductive....asking for anything isn't going to fly.

      I've seen this pretty often. Someone thinks that they deserve a raise because they are overworked. Yet, they spend 20-25 hours every week clearly not working. This does not go unnoticed by the management and will certainly hurt your chances of getting what you want. Obviously you can take short breaks here and there, but make sure reality reflects your statement.

    104. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by ArghBlarg · · Score: 1

      ... probably true (the part about the post being intended for India). However, the company then deserves whatever it gets. Last company I worked for had the bright idea of outsourcing to Wipro. Ended up costing them far more than they bargained for. That company would lie through its teeth about the skills of its 'consultants' and 'programmers'. I had trouble feeling sorry for my company, as they'd instituted a hiring freeze in the US and Canadian offices in order to try and save money outsourcing. The lost productivity cleaning up after the outsourced peoples' mess obliterated any savings they had hoped to get.

      --
      ERROR 144 - REBOOT ?
    105. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Wikipedia said it's a programming language and, hey, programming is programming, right?"

      Yeah. It is. Algorithms are a process.

      Now, BASIC is not ALGOL is not is is not C++ is not COBOL is not SQL is not FoxBase is not Visual Basic, BUT
      if an individual can pseudocode a solution to a problem that can be solved programmatically, with a good understanding
      of the peccadilloes of the particular language, an individual could proficiently program.

      OK. OK. OK... JK.

      I can't program IA32Assembler cause I haven't touched assembly code in over 20 years. And even then i was tedious.
      But, algorithmic processes all follow similar methods. The structure is still pretty general.

    106. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't use the term "team player", but the point is you can't trust people who try to extort money out of you, and I don't want employees that I can't trust.

      So are you saying that you're okay with extorting labor from your employees? That's the flip side of this situation. "Work more hours/additional duties for the same pay or you're fired" is no less reprehensible.

      You push your employees, don't be surprised when they push back.

    107. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Ahnteis · · Score: 1

      > If a manager doesn't save the company at least as much as his/her own salary, then he/she isn't doing his/her job, or his/her job needs to be eliminated.

      No, if the manager doesn't MAKE the company at least as much as his/her own salary....

      Trying to calculate savings is not only stupid, it leads to short-term "savings" that cost more in the long run.

    108. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Nobody questions that. But when I say "intimate knowledge" of IA32, I do expect the person to know the quirks and flag side effects of certain instructions. I do expect him to know what registers are implicitly used in instructions like loadsb and rep. I hope we can agree that I cannot use someone who is basically a web designer with some half-assed knowledge of JavaScript who looks at me blankly when I mention the stack or flag registers (or registers at all).

      In general, yes, I agree. Imperative language is imperative language. I have no problem hiring someone fluent in Pascal or C++ when I need someone for C#. Yes, he won't know the details of some libraries and certain language quirks, but he can be productive. But I can't put someone who has a passing knowledge in JavaScript to dissect and analyze self modifying disassembled asm code.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    109. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Hiring is about the worst thing you can be challenged with in a company. When you climb the company ladder, you're eventually challenged with it, at the very least if HR isn't completely incompetent they will sooner or later find out that they can't assess an applicant's knowledge well enough to make that decision and they will come to you to "take a look at your prospective new coder".

      And then you're sitting there. Reading resumes. Some of them mighty impressive. Some of them rather plain. Some of them with more design than the average ad. Some with less than the average throw-away circular. And, not so oddly, the latter ones are the ones that I want to read in more detail. If someone can get a job without spewing ads like an Amway salesman, he is either really GOOD because he gets jobs without trying hard, or he is very desperate because he cannot get jobs 'cause he gets overlooked with his bland resume. Both conditions that are to my liking.

      So yes, the more flashy your resume, the more likly it's gone to the waste bin unread, at least if you're applying with me. But I'm the odd man out here, usually HR loves those flashy high-gloss multicolor-gimmicky resume folders the size of your average phone book. For me, if you can't be assed to think what I might want from you and put those skills on a single page, I can't be assed to read through your 10 page resume. Gimme what I want to read or be gone. If you cannot tell me what you can do in a terse, snappy way, you cannot give me a sensible status update later when you're working for me either. We're in a business where speed matters. You will also notice that the tone is quite rough and we do not spend much time on pleasantries. I don't need a sweettalker and I have no use for a yes-man. I need someone who can tell me in no uncertain terms why my idea does not fly if it does not. It's not "I think this might not be a good idea, I think we should take into acount...". It's "This is crap. Reason: a, b, c, d".

      There's a reason why I'm one of the "old" people here. You need a good stomach to survive this here for long, and you have to have a quite big frustration potential because whatever you do will be flushed down the loo in half a year because it's obsolete. And pay is usually not THAT good to sit it out for the money. Either you want to do this or you're really wrong here. It's worse than game dev.

      And in such an industry you're sitting there, wanting to hire. Out of 10 applicants, you can toss 9 immediately because they don't even come close to being qualified. The rest either has insane ideas about wages, a criminal record or some other reason why you just cannot use him. And at the same time you know that if you don't hire someone soon, they'll simply hire anyone and dump the dud on you.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    110. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by DeadDecoy · · Score: 1

      Again, I think this is part of the employees responsibility to manage expectations. I think it's human nature, rather than a fault with the manager, to want more stuff. You just have to re-establish shared goals through communication. If the manager asks for extra stuff, and it's not mission critical, it can be added onto the schedule and accomplished after the core requirements are finished. More often than not, deadlines get fudged, and I'm sure the manager will appreciate a final, complete project rather than an incomplete project with feature creep.

    111. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by fractoid · · Score: 1

      As a manager, I can tell you its this sort of short-sightedness that will buy you a one way ticket to the street.

      Absolutely. By pulling such a stunt, you'll have permanently destroyed any trust they had in you as an employee. If you stay at the company they'll have to relegate you to only non-essential tasks, purely to protect themselves from similar extortion later. Most likely that will just be a waste of your time and their money, and so they'll boot you and hire someone who they can trust.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    112. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by fractoid · · Score: 1

      He didn't fire the first shot, his employer did. They used the economic downturn and his goodwill to dump huge quantities of additional responsibility on him without any compensation. All he is doing is returning fire and all power to him. Honestly, if they treat him like this now odds are he'll get laid off after project launch anyway, as they are treating him as disposable. So he might as well get his pay now 'cos he sure won't get it later.

      Actually, not so much. The employer using the economic downturn to get extra work out of him for no extra pay is the flip side of him now using the economic revival to demand more money from them. That's fair enough.

      Holding the project to ransom just before launch to get a pay raise is as bad as the company kidnapping his pet dog and using it to extort a pay cut from him.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    113. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Sure, who doesn't want 3x as much? In this economy, they will probably work for 75% of the prima donna they just fired, because after months of interviews, they know they aren't going to do much better, and some income is better than no income.

      And this is why it's wise to have another job lined up before you start causing drama in the one you already have. If you don't like your current job, you don't have a poopie at them, quit, and then start looking. You quietly apply for a couple on the side. Then, when you get an offer, you talk to management and say "I've been offered X elsewhere". If you like your current job more than the new one, you give them a chance to counter-offer and keep you at a higher rate. If your new job pays that much more, or is that much more fun, then you just hand in your notice. I tend to get a 5% yearly pay rise at absolute most if I'm just sitting at the same company, but I tend to get a 10%+ raise when I move jobs (I actually start a new one in three weeks' time that pays 24% more than my current salary!), so moving jobs is a way to rapidly jack up your salary.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    114. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      You think this sort of thing is limited to IT? I've got some bad news for you ..

    115. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by anyGould · · Score: 1

      to use a project launch as leverage is to show that you're manipulative and not a team player.

      Agreed. Always use project launches to demonstrate a lack of team playing. Walking out the door three days before a release really gets the point across.

      What's this "team" you speak of? This is business we're talking about here - your job is to maximize profit. Not just for the company, but for yourself. Team spirit is great and all, but that doesn't put the kids through school. Your company will never trade profits for "good feelings" - why should you?

    116. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless they happen to be related to the owners.*

      Or, in the US, happen to be of the correct skin color and/or gender.

    117. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by redscare2k4 · · Score: 1

      That works when you have a prima donna to start with. If you have an underpaid guy, good luck finding an equally skilled candidate willing to work for 75% of the salary (and that it's not going to walk out of the door 3 months later when he finds a decent job).

    118. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Or a college student with the same skills that will work for a reasonable wage.

      Or an Indian with more knowledge who will do more work for a 3rd as much.

      People really need to get off their high horses and realize that there are plenty of people in the world who would be happy to work for far less just because its working for something ... rather than starving.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    119. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Not really, most will work for far less as long as you can speak their language ... which ever version of Engrish it happens to be.

      Contrary to popular belief, its not hard to find cheap help in the IT industry, its rather over populated and as long as you don't mind working with people who don't speak great english you can find very qualified individuals for next to nothing.

      Climb off your high horse before the fall kills you.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    120. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      But let's assume I'm replacable.

      Thats a stupid assumption. It could not possibly be more wrong.

      I can replace you, regardless of whatever it is you think you do that so special.

      It might take some time (could take years!) but I promise you, I can do anything you can do and probably do it better.

      The real problem is, out of the 6 billion or so people out there, many of them can replace you and will have the ground work to replace you in a much shorter time than I.

      You will lose output in the short term, but if you're planning your company around the short term, its highly unlikely there will be a long term to worry about.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    121. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. I've personally had projects where they took the cheaper developer over me, then came back to me in two weeks asking if I could still work with them. It's unfortunate with those projects that we couldn't just save some time and skip the superfluous steps.

      (Please note: In no way am I stating that Indian developers as a group are less skilled or whatever else. There are a lot of firms that exploit Western companies looking for cheap coders though; they are who I am speaking of.)

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    122. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by AthleteMusicianNerd · · Score: 1

      You think you're irreplaceable?

      I think every time I post a new position I get 100 candidates more qualified than your dumbass.

      That is until you start calling them back and find out that 95 won't return your call because they found other jobs better than working for a shithead like you, then of the 5 that come in 3 or 4 of them misrepresent themselves, which leaves you with 1 or 2 who want double what you're paying the "dumbass".

    123. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      In my trade you do not have those years. You have a few months. Tops. And even then, you're already falling behind. If you do not produce for "years" (because that's essentially what kicking the few key people you have out means), you can just as well shut your company down. Unless of course you're not hanging on quality but marketing and getting suckers to use your ... I don't want to say worthless, but it would be the most fitting label ... product.

      Fortunately, though, the few "good" people that exist are also the ones that are not in it for the money. Money is nice, but once you have enough to live, why bother wanting more? It's mostly a matter of how you treat me, I'll treat you. As stated above, an hour of me is expensive. And if you cram 80+ hours into my week, rest assured that every single one thereof will be billed. If you give me an assignment and let me pick the pace, I will probably end up with 80+ hours a week, too, because it's sometimes simply necessary. Especially in my trade, you have weeks that exist of working, sleeping and somewhere in between stuffing food into your face. It's necessary sometimes. It cannot be necessary all of the time. If it is, hire more people. I can train people to at least be able to aid me in my work. Not hiring people when I am crunching time for two people only tells me one thing: You don't care that you're wearing me out. And I will not allow this. In the long run, it does ruin me. I have seen people in burnout. Even being kicked out beats this. Because then, you really ARE unable to do anything anymore. For a long while. Possibly forever.

      Treat your worker with respect and he will work for you. Treat him like a replacable light bulb and he will burn out sooner or later. If you can afford this, nice for you. If you find someone stupid enough to let you do it with him, even nicer for you. But not very nice of you.

      In short, don't bother hire me. I do not think we'll get along.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    124. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      By stuffing four jobs into one person, the company would have lost all trust I put into it as an employee anyway. In short, this is the moment when you start looking for a new job because this one is nothing but a quick way to burnout. Take with you as much as you can and get out of there. Fast.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    125. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      People really need to get off their high horses and realize that there are plenty of people in the world who would be happy to work for far less just because its working for something ... rather than starving.

      I'm sorry, but once you get above 7/11 and WalMart/K-Mart (we're talking I.T. after all) we've kinda lifted a *touch* above the whole starving realm.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    126. Re:Bad, Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there are truly only 5 other people with your skillset, and there's a market for 500, then it sounds like there are a lot of other companies jumping at the chance to have you aboard.

  11. Give up. by bistromath007 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    You don't seem to understand how modern "capitalism" works. When your boss said "we don't have the budget," he meant exactly that. If you push for more money, or even just ask, if they're really antsy, you'll be filing for unemployment.

    1. Re:Give up. by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, what his boss meant was that after the company gives said boss a huge bonus for "cost savings"(read working his people into the ground while essentially adding no value of his own), there is no budget left. If the OP threatens to leave then all of a sudden from somewhere(read boss's undeserved bonus) money will materialize.

      Work, like much of life, is really a game of chicken. Thats why always advisable to have a large amount of savings, and if possible, a spouse with a good job. That way, when the boss dumps work on you without giving you a pay raise you can balk at his (almost certainly idle) threat to fire you.

    2. Re:Give up. by Tuoqui · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If they dont have the money to pay this person, they certainly wont have the money to pay the 2-3 people that they would likely have to hire to replace this person.

      If I were the person and I truly knew the company was cash strapped I'd accept things that arent immediate money... like stock options, extra vacation time, setting your own hours or telecommuting for some of those 60-80 hour weeks. The latter could save you huge $$$ in terms of gas expended commuting.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
    3. Re:Give up. by publiclurker · · Score: 1

      Funny, the last boss who tried that line on me wanted that budget for the new gourmet kitchen he was working on. (word of advice, if you are sending secret email to the office, either assign your own email address as the postmaster, or pay for a system that doesn't break ever other day.) I left for a job with a 40% pay raise. Thei had to sell to a competitor after half of the staff followed my lead.

    4. Re:Give up. by ktappe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You don't seem to understand how modern "capitalism" works. When your boss said "we don't have the budget," he meant exactly that. If you push for more money, or even just ask, if they're really antsy, you'll be filing for unemployment.

      And a boss would never lie about not having more money in the budget....right?

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    5. Re:Give up. by bistromath007 · · Score: 1

      It seems like people misinterpreted my previous statement. This is largely my fault, I worded it kind of poorly.

      The guy who first responded to me said "No, what his boss meant was that after the company gives said boss a huge bonus for "cost savings"(read working his people into the ground while essentially adding no value of his own), there is no budget left." That's basically exactly what I meant, except that his assertion that putting pressure on him will make the boss reduce his bonus for the sake of the company is naively optimistic given what we know about how corporations work lately. This is especially true for any kind of IT, which many bosses give absolutely no crap about. If you make waves to get a raise, you're just as likely to be replaced by an idiot who does the job wrong but cheaper as any other outcome, because most of the company won't know the difference.

    6. Re:Give up. by mysidia · · Score: 1

      If I were the person and I truly knew the company was cash strapped I'd accept things that arent immediate money... like stock options, extra vacation time, setting your own hours or telecommuting for some of those 60-80 hour weeks. The latter could save you huge $$$ in terms of gas expended commuting.

      Hm.. let's see... illiquid stock options, that are essentially worthless unless the company gets bought some day, instead of going bankrupt....

      Extra vacation time that cannot be used while being forced into 60-80 hours weeks to get that project done, and will be completely worthless once layoff after-project-done is executed.

      Telecommuting... still working those same amount of extra hours, with no fair pay addition, just from a different place.

    7. Re:Give up. by Gorobei · · Score: 1

      You don't seem to understand how modern "capitalism" works. When your boss said "we don't have the budget," he meant exactly that. If you push for more money, or even just ask, if they're really antsy, you'll be filing for unemployment.

      Budgets are funny things, you can get them moved by several hundred percent when people see they need to be changed.

      At most of my previous jobs, at year's end, management sat me down and told me what my comp for the year was. Every year, it was "we'd like to pay more, but the pool is limited, and we got you as big a share as we could."

      Each time I handled in my resignation, the magical "fixed budget" suddenly had money for immediate counter-offers at 1.5X. Then "let me call my boss, we can do 2X easily."

    8. Re:Give up. by Kittenman · · Score: 1
      Of course, when they said "we don't have the budget" he did mean exactly that. But there is budget allocated to other activities that can be raided. Training/Education, personal growth, the managers' Christmas do, things like that.

      Budgets are flexible.

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    9. Re:Give up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot no children and no significant debt.

  12. Standard fare, complex situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Company hires person in low-to-moderately paid job. Responsibilities and workload increase. Salary does not rise to certified-external-hire level. Details to follow.
    Basically, this is what happens regularly.

    Now, where to go depends on how you assess your position.

    Firstly, does the company tend to give people promotions and raises informally, kind of like a surprise, or is it a structured process? Both can happen, but companies mostly only prefer one.
    In the former case, there's a 1/3 chance it's coming and they want to see how you handle things - in this case you could drop some very small hints. It's a 1/3 chance they have forgotten about it - in this case you could drop some very small hints, and you might get it. It's a 1/3 chance they simply don't care.
    If it's a structured process, you are obviously not getting it without banging the table.

    Because your odds are slim, let's consider banging the table. If you do this, you should be very aware that it COULD lead to you not working there any more. In the eyes of the bosses that be, you used to do one job (marketing and writing) and you are doing less of that and more of another, which does not qualify in itself for a raise. So consider - how employable are you? How easily could you get a job if you needed one? If the answer is "pretty good" and "pretty sure", then that's great. I should point out though that online content producers are usually 15 a dozen (in my view) and what you can hire interns for cheap as chips - so if you MUST move, could you find another job doing that at your current salary? To be honest, 'writing articles for a webpage and setting up facebook and twitter' sounds a bit weak for a full-time well-paid job if it's a small company.

    You could also ask for an agreement that you will do ONLY this from IT and then no more IT tasks. But in that case you also risk not working there any more - because there might be a reason you have been asked to do more IT instead of articles. If they tell you "well, we didn't like your articles to be honest, but we feel you can add value doing IT", would that crush you completely? Would you be able to face them again?

    Lastly, you could ask for a title upgrade only. This is the safest bet. What you decide for the title would A) let you find a better job elsewhere than you otherwise could, B) let you influence somewhat the path (e.g. the title 'Head of IT developments' may land you interviews for other jobs than 'Online Production Manager' C) your title itself should act subtly to influence whether you get more or less marketing/IT tasks going forward.

    So the answer is, it very much depends on the details that only you know.

  13. What's the big deal by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

    If you have a some kind of a periodic performance review coming up (you do have those?) that would be a good time, but there is nothing wrong with just walking up to your boss and asking for a raise. Be professional and realistic about it, after all whatever the answer is you'll still be working there so you don't want to be hostile. Understand that your relationship with your employer is just about supply and demand, nothing personal. If they can pay you less or else replace you with an equally qualified person at a lower cost they should, and they will. If you can find another employer who will offer you a higher salary, you should etc. I remember during the dot com boom, I could practically change my job monthly and get a higher salary each time. In this economy though, they are probably in a stronger position than you.

    --
    Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    1. Re:What's the big deal by Ironpoint · · Score: 1

      There's nothing ethically wrong, but if someone does ask for a raise there is a good chance that person will be verbally reprimanded for doing so. Some managers do take it personally because their job is to keep employees happy with low pay. Asking for a raise can be seen as an accusation that they are failing in that task.

      I think an employee should first determine the intelligence, temperament, and maturity level of the manager,

  14. That's easy by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 1

    First of all, you have to meet your bosses realizing that there are pretty good odds that you will walk out of that door without a job. After all, if you don't want to lose your job then you are in no position to demand a better deal and let's face it, if they are firing people left and right of you then they surely don't intend to keep you for long.

    Knowing that, the scenario you painted leads to believe that your bosses rely on you to pretty much do everything remotely related to a computer. That, along with the fact that they have fired pretty much everyone capable of doing what you do, indicates that you do have a decent bargaining power. After all, if they fire you then they will be left with no one to man the ship and good luck finding another poor bastard that is willing to do all that work while being down on the corporate totem pole and while being paid your salary.

    Based on that, just be straight forward with your demands. Inform your boss that, based on your new responsibilities and roles, you would like to get a raise and a promotion. Expect your boss to shovel a hefty load of crap when he turns down your offer. If he doesn't budge then just tell him that you quit and therefore let him a) reconsider your demands or b) start looking for yet another poor bastard to dump your work on, which will never manage to do as he will be even more overloaded than you, or b) see his pet project grind to a halt at least for the next 2 to 3 weeks, while he desperately tries to find someone who is willing to be paid peanuts while shouldering all that work.

    --
    Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
  15. Ask for it. by nordaim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been in this situation more than once. Each time it happened I worked with my direct manager to figure out the best solution whether that was a higher salary, better benefits (vacation, flex hours, compressed work week), or other, more ephemeral, perks like a new job title. Of the 6 times I was in this situation, 3 of which were at one company, I only walked once.

    However, in order to be able to walk that meant I always had an escape plan. Even when I was elated about a job and would go home floating on cloud 9 there were always options in the back of my mind of where I would go. I continued to job hunt: sending out my resume, talking to HR at another company, or networking with friends in the industry at least once a week. Plus, even when my budget was tight, by force of will alone I kept an emergency fund that would let me float for a while without racking up my credit cards.

    Never let yourself get in a place where a company, or anyone for that matter, can take advantage of you without recourse.

    --
    -- You don't shoot to kill, you shoot to stay alive.
    1. Re:Ask for it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent comment.

      For me, I always manage my life a way that nobody cannot have any leverage on my life.
      - unsatisfied with the company I work
      - work too mutch and effort unpreciated
      - under paid

      I will change jobs, because working 40-50-60 hours for a company and being unhappy is bad for moral, life at home.
      We need to manage our jobs like a company.

      When you don't do your job or they don't need you anymore, they will fired you.
      Same thing in your case:
      - work on your résumé
      - job hunting
      - network with ex-colleague, etc

      If you meet your boss and don't have a Plan B....he may show you the doors
      Reason: nobody like to be pushed on the wall

      My opinion

    2. Re:Ask for it. by Third+Normal+Form · · Score: 1

      I agree with the need for an escape plan. The 2001 recession taught me that the emergency fund isn't an abstract concept, it's as important as paying your electric bill (I have used it to pay the electric bill).

      I also agree with asking for better compensation.

      Also, consider that, even if no extra compensation for added responsibilities is given, that there may be a huge value in new responsibilities. You might not get money now, but when you are looking for future jobs making more money, more doors may open because of the skills and experience you bring to the table. Somebody making a hiring decision might view a content producer with proven sysadmin skills as more valuable than a content producer who has always worked with a sysadmin.

      Looking back, I'm hugely grateful to the younger me for not saying "that's not my job" and quietly building skills and experience.

    3. Re:Ask for it. by Boogaroo · · Score: 1

      Recession nothing.
      After witnessing how the Mexican government shut down almost every restaurant, school, movie theater, grocery story, stadium, and more... I keep two months food on hand plus six months rent/utilities on hand.
      It was very handy when I got laid off April 1st. Yeah, talk about the worst day of the year to get laid off other than Christmas, but I was prepared. I was re-hired in 6 weeks, but I only burned through half my food.

      Having the food on hand meant that being laid off did not lead to a panic mode reaction. Unemployment paid $9.70/hr instead of the $17.35 I was making. Thus, when a job offer for $11.00/hr came by, I was willing to pass it up by not responding. Holding out paid off since a friend of a friend referred me to a job that paid $16.00/hr. I accepted that. It sucks going from tier 3 support to tier 1 support, but there's a clear progression that leads to a $24.00 a job if I play my cards right.

      I know some folks here make much more, but the game played is still the same. We all have to face our jobs from the position we're in. I appreciate the game plans and observations in the thread since they really seem to apply to my life and my long term goals.

    4. Re:Ask for it. by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I think this is the best advice here.

      Ultimately, the terms of your employment were negotiated when you were hired. You agreed to do X and they agreed to pay you $Y (and give Z benefits). That's the deal. You didn't just agree to do "whatever your boss tells you". When they ask you to do something outside of X, they're renegotiating. It's always a negotiation, so if you aren't satisfied with the situation, then negotiate for something better.

      Now there are lots of ways that they can sweeten the deal, and pay is just one. There's the possibility of better perks, better working conditions, more time off, more flexible working hours, more strict working hours (i.e. you work your hours and then leave; no ifs, ands, or buts), or a better title. It's funny, but sometimes even relatively small changes can make you happier about your work life, and if you're valuable to your company, they should be willing to work on it with you.

      However, if you're going to renegotiate, you have to have leverage. That means that, when they ask you to do something outside of your job description, you have to be willing to say "no, not unless...". If you want real leverage, you'll have to be willing to quit if it comes to that. If you're desperate to keep your job and you'd be willing to do whatever your boss asks you to do, then you have no leverage to negotiate.

  16. This isn't going to end well for you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The BEST outcome is that you talk to your manager, explain what's happened, he agrees, and migrates your pay to be more role-appropriate. However, the chance of that happening is VERY low. A company that would respond well to that would also have migrated your pay along with your responsibilities.

    Have you heard of a BATNA before? Its called a "Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement". Basically, if your negotiations fail, what do you do? You only have two options: 1) continue the job; 2) find another job/quit. You need to know which of those is your strategy. From there, start playing the game.

    Here's what I'd suggest:
    * Don't document anything. Obfuscate all the stuff. Don't write down passwords. Yes, it sounds dickish, and I wouldn't have said this a few years ago. My tune has changed.
    * Hold them hostage. Another posted suggested bringing this up when they're a reasonable distance out from the launch date, but still committed to the path. Excellent advice. If you wait until launch+1 day, you've lost your negotiating position.
    * Ask your manager to prioritize things. Managers hate doing that because it makes them make a decision. Write down all the tasks, and always say, "which needs to be done first?"
    * Leave at 5pm. Just stop what you're doing, get up, and walk out.
    * Be prepared to walk. Offer to come back 1099. You'd be surprised how many companies do this.
    * Offer to split your job: W2 is your marketing job, 1099 is your outside work. Know the difference in pay rates and times.

    Keep in mind its the company's job to hire the best people at the lowest wage--your goals and their goals are counter to each other.

    They will fuck you over the first chance they get (as if they haven't already). Its your job to defend yourself in both hours and time.

    Good luck.

  17. i, uhhh, concur by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course my other thought is that I'd much rather go back to writing and working with marketing than getting back into IT.

    Wrong thing to say to this crowd. Although, honestly, I completely agree with the sentiment and feel that you'll probably be better off in the long run if you do that.

    And another bit of advice: don't even think of trying the pseudo-blackmail suggestions that have been modded up so far. You'll find yourself out of work before you know it.

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:i, uhhh, concur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pseudo-blackmail?

      Like when the boss orders you to start doing other people's jobs because he knows that the job-market is thin and you probably won't quit?

      The boss doesn't say it that way. No, he is much more polite and indirect just like the OP should be when he asks for more money.

    2. Re:i, uhhh, concur by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      And another bit of advice: don't even think of trying the pseudo-blackmail suggestions that have been modded up so far. You'll find yourself out of work before you know it.

      Right now he's getting leaned on by his company. Hard.
      His departure, voluntary or not, will kick the legs out from under their IT dept.
      What this means is that he has leverage.

      How is saying "give me a raise or replace me with at least two other people" pseudo-blackmail?
      You think the company will save time or money by firing him and then bringing two new guys up to speed for a much higher combined salary?

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:i, uhhh, concur by ktappe · · Score: 1

      don't even think of trying the pseudo-blackmail suggestions that have been modded up so far. You'll find yourself out of work before you know it.

      His company has already pseudo-blackmailed him, by dumping more work on him under (unspoken) threat of losing his job if he doesn't do it. THEY fired the first shot. You're saying he should just roll over and take it? Is that what you do every time someone in life takes advantage of you? I hope not, though there's always a certain % of the populace who does....

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    4. Re:i, uhhh, concur by tftp · · Score: 1

      How is saying "give me a raise or replace me with at least two other people" pseudo-blackmail? You think the company will save time or money by firing him and then bringing two new guys up to speed for a much higher combined salary?

      It is possible that the company will have no choice but to let him go and hire whatever replacements are needed. This will happen if he loses trust of his boss. Most companies would really like an employee who is happy, but will be OK with an employee who is just doing his job. But it is dangerous to keep a disgruntled employee, for many obvious reasons. It all depends, of course, on what the guy tells his boss and how they discuss it all. But even if the boss doesn't see the guy as disgruntled, the boss clearly understands that the employee will be looking for a job elsewhere, and thus a replacement is needed. After that it's merely a race between the employee quitting and the boss finding a replacement.

    5. Re:i, uhhh, concur by karnal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you utilize "leverage" to get what you want, your employer will see this and use "leverage" when they want.

      Ultimately, if the question needs brought up, it probably isn't a win-win scenario you're looking at here anyways.

      --
      Karnal
    6. Re:i, uhhh, concur by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      There's a right way and a wrong way to go about negotiating. I didn't say that he shouldn't negotiate. I'm just saying that taking the "give me what I want or else the project gets it" approach is most certainly the wrong way to handle this.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    7. Re:i, uhhh, concur by PlanningWithAHeart · · Score: 1

      "Of course my other thought is that I'd much rather go back to writing and working with marketing than getting back into IT. " Have you ever explored working for yourself? Are you a really good writer? Could you market those skills and add to your income outside the company? Be aware there is competition everywhere right now and quitting a job without carefully exploring your options within and outside the company may not be the best move right now. Lots of suggestions in other replies about how to approach your current manager are possibilities to explore first. Be respectful of the company and yourself. Think carefully about what you really want and how to present your case in a way they understand why you are asking for a raise or help.

  18. I would just find a new job by taskiss · · Score: 1

    I'd find a new job and negotiate a higher salary, then turn in my 2 weeks notice. If you want to accept the probable counter-offer you can, but don't be surprised if it's not forthcoming in this day and age.

    No matter how important YOU think you are, it's their opinion of you that matters where wages are concerned.

    --
    - real hackers don't have sigs -
    1. Re:I would just find a new job by Algan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Never accept a counter-offer. Chances are that they will replace you as soon as they can afterwards. If you're still considering staying there, ask for a raise before you put in your 2 weeks notice. If they value you, you'll get it.

      --
      If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of progress?
  19. Don't be a pushover by supertrinko · · Score: 1

    Being employed is not a case of "you're the begger, they're the chooser" They require a service, you're providing that service. If they require more out of you, then they're going to have to give some more. It works well for them if all their employees believe that the employer is the one with all the power. But they need you more than you need them. Without employees, the company will fail. Make them realize they need you, if they're really putting as much responsibility on you as you say, then they do need you.

    --
    If it rhymes it must be true.
  20. It's different Now for Corporations & Individu by gink1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It seems that ever since this "Great Recession / Depression" started that a lot of things have changed.
    Our Fearless Leader has been trying to convince us it's all over now, but the EU would no doubt disagree!

    The outlook for Corporations has improved though and some are hiring key people they can find now for some slots (but pay is not too good).
    For most though, they have learned they can make a lot of money without their former staffing.

    So individuals are doing more, often much much more for the same or less money. Grab a better position if you can, but it might be tough to get the next one. DO NOT do what a friend did and quit before securing the next position. Several of my Professional friends have been out for about 2 years now. I can't understand how they are surviving!

    I was quite fortunate to find an Engineering position right at the start of the Recession and have held it.
    It's a great position - great work, learning many skills and much programming.
    After putting in the required long hours, I actually received commendations for my efforts.

    I received a raise after that, but my manager told me he had to fight tooth and nail to get me 3%.
    It was eye opening and after reflection, I consider myself quite lucky.

    The #1 Goal of ALL Corporations is to maximize profits. Why wouldn't they take full advantage of the current employment situation?

  21. Movin' on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Move on to another company.

    If your current company hasn't increased your compensation to match your duties and responsibilities, they never will. Given they are reducing operating costs, they may just say "goodbye" when you ask for more money.

    -
    Good luck.

  22. Do your research by oddTodd123 · · Score: 1

    Do some research and get good estimates of what people doing your job(s) in the area earn. Figure out how much you are worth based on how much time you spend doing each of these jobs and sit down with the person who has the power to give you the raise you deserve and present your case. You'd be surprised how willing most bosses are to give you a small bump to keep you happy, especially if they know you are being overworked. On the other hand, if this company is going through budget cuts and layoffs and can't afford to hire the right people for the job, you might be better off keeping your mouth shut, updating your resume, and shopping for a new job.

  23. Don't hold your breath. by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

    A few years ago, I started a new job -- I was hired to do a small task, expected to take 6 to 12 months (government contracting). At the time, I had been unemployed for 7 months, and so had taken a lower pay rate, thinking it was an easy job, and I'd use the tuition benefits to continue work on my master's degree.

    My second day on the job, someone quit and I got handed his task. My third day on the job, in a meeting w/ HR for the company, I was told that if my job changed significantly, they could get me a promotion. I told her that it had already happened. She must've thought I was joking as *nothing* was done about it.

    Every couple of months, I brought it up with my manager. (mind you, my manager didn't deal with my tasking -- it's government contracting, so the ATR (civil servant) tells me what to do, my manager only dealt with making sure we were complying with contract requirements and HR issues). I had meetings with my manager's boss, and I think at one time even his boss. It was nothing but a run-around.

    They told me they couldn't do anything 'til the annual raises. When I got a 7% raise and bitched, they acted like I should be grateful. I stayed on as I knew the contract was up for rebid. (and told my manager and ATR that if the company I worked for won, I was quitting). It dragged on something like an extra 6 months because of one of the losing companies bitching that it was unfairly awarded.

    Of course, the sub-contractor that I was passed off to said they didn't want to re-negotiate anyone's pay, and it took my ATR and manger (now working for the new prime contractor) telling them that they needed to make an exception for me, and that I should get a 20-25% raise.

    Because of my being difficult, I got less than a 20% raise (they had said they wouldn't hire me unless I gave them a paystub, but I had blacked out all of the amounts that could've been used to calculate my pay rate ... I missed the 'year to date' amount, and they didn't know I had gotten a raise 2 months before, so they had thought they were offering me a 22.5% raise.)

    In the end -- it was 2 years to get the issue resolved. If I hadn't switched companies, I don't think it would've gotten changed, as L-3 Communications was absolute dicks to me on the issue the whole time.

    So, the moral of the story -- if you approach them, and they don't do something about it quickly -- walk. Well, line up a new job first -- if they start giving excuses as to why they can't do anything, start looking for a new job, as it's a sign they don't care.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:Don't hold your breath. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't mean to be argumentative, but your attitude was the problem. You approached them as if you were begging for money and it was their decision whether you got it. You need to go to them with an attitude that they need you and they're going to have to treat you fairly. I'm not saying be confrontational; in fact, being apologetic about it is often the best tactic. It's the same one they use on you, after all. You simply say, "I'm sorry, but this is a problem, and it needs to be fixed or I'm going to have to leave." As long as you make it seem like it's completely up to them, you should never expect to earn what you deserve.

  24. Do way you can in 40 hrs by hellfire · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Take a few hours to basically put together a report of how long all this is going to take and over estimate. Overestimating is important here. When you explain this to your boss, don't say I can't do blah, say this is what I can do. They may ask for more, say that's impossible. When they push, and they will, give them a little, just enough to cut into your overestimate then hope they take it. If they push and try to make you do 60-80 hours, you are fucked. Dust up your resume. But if they accept your logic and push the schedule or hire someone then logic wins.

    Your company is fucked right now. They somehow got into a situation where they need to meet a goal without proper resources. So they are trying to squeeze you for all they can and you let them. The above is what you should have done originally. Now that they saddled you with this they are glig to blame failures on you. You always need to know what you can and can't do. They have no money to fulfill your requests but if you push back politely you might find something. However I doubt this. If they were good managers they wouldn't be in this situation.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

  25. Be very careful by mmmmbeer · · Score: 1

    Sounds to me they've already dumped some "important" people to let someone unqualified (no offense intended, but that's how it seems) do the job. I doubt they'd be too troubled about doing it again. It's true you might be able to get a little extra if you demand it right before a deadline, but you'll also end up out of a job right after the deadline, so I wouldn't suggest that. Your best option is to do your homework, then tactfully broach the subject. By doing your homework, I mean find out how much someone doing your job can expect to make at similar jobs in your area. That gives you justification for why you should be paid more. You could also put out some feelers about whether there are jobs available; but be careful, because your company might not want to keep you if they think you're going to leave. Anyway, once you've done that, approach them with an attitude of "we need to renegotiate my contract." This is important. You do not want to simply state that they need to pay you more; that would make them defensive. You also shouldn't approach it like you're begging for money, because then you're putting the decision entirely in their hands. Instead, come with a list of changes you'd be interested in seeing: title, money, underlings, etc. Much like buying a car, you want to aim a little better than you expect to get, so you've got room to haggle. Be firm but not aggressive or offensive; remember that you are selling a valuable commodity. If you do this right you can earn their respect and make them feel you deserve more; and you'll probably get both a small to medium raise and a better title.

  26. Run! by codepunk · · Score: 1

    Look if they do not have enough money to employ a proper admin it is time to cut and run.

    --


    Got Code?
  27. Blah blah by clinko · · Score: 1

    Blah blah blah. That's what I just read.

    1. Float some resumes.
    2. Call out sick when in interviews
    3. Pick the new job you like. Haven't made it to step 3? Stop bitching.

    Life isn't that hard.

  28. You've created your own problem by Rantastic · · Score: 1

    I was originally hired as an Online Content Producer to write articles for a company website as well as start up the company's social media outlets on Facebook and Twitter.

    Now that we're closer to launch the company has informed me that they don't have the budget or staff in place to set up the web server and have tasked me with setting up the LAMP and Zend App on an Amazon EC2 setup.

    This is where you tell them, "gee, that LAMP sounds like fun... As a writer, while I seem to be ok at some of this ad hoc project management, I really don't know the first thing about setting up a linux whatever server. Do you think I could get some training?"

    If they are simply demanding that you figure it out and get it done. Just do your best while updating your resume and finding a new job. A company that plays this game will never give you a raise. In their eyes, the mere fact that you could take on more work, while getting your original work done, means you were being overpaid to begin with.

    --
    Ask Slashdot: Where bad ideas meet poor googling skills.
    1. Re:You've created your own problem by /dev/trash · · Score: 2, Informative

      have you not heard? The economy sucks! No one is hiring!

    2. Re:You've created your own problem by Rantastic · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is a tough job market out there. However, there are lots of companies hiring. Those companies are currently in a position to be very picky about openings. Regardless, top talent is having no trouble getting work.

      The reality of the situation is that those who are currently employed have a much better shot at landing a new gig than those who have been out of work for months.

      Some companies have even started noting in their ads that they are not interested in candidates that have been out of work for more than 3 months, etc. So while it is a rough job market right now, the OP stands a good chance of landing a new gig if he's worth his salt.

      --
      Ask Slashdot: Where bad ideas meet poor googling skills.
    3. Re:You've created your own problem by HellYeahAutomaton · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you not heard? These are just lies so that employers can keep wages down.
      It's not as bad as everyone says.

  29. Ask for it? by dindi · · Score: 1

    Sounds easy, but sometimes it can be hard.

    Ask for it. If some BS answer comes up, tell them, that they are saving on others' salaries, and that saving could benefit the ones taking over extras.

    Either way, if you cannot ask for a raise for more work at a company, what kind of future are you expecting there? I guess you do not want to retire from there, because you would be making the same $$ in a management role with a title that does not match.

    Of course, if you are feeding a family where jobs are scarce, you should just suck it up and wait for something better.

    However, asking for a raise is not a bad thing in the eyes of most management, if they know you work a lot and do it well.

    Just my 2c.....

  30. Much more to consider by whosaidanythingabout · · Score: 1

    First, do you enjoy working there? Second, do you see this as a place you would like to work for the long term (say greater than 5 years).I think that these answers will dictate your action.

    If the answer to both is no then you should immediately brush up your resume and find another job.

    If you answered yes, then you should document your situation. Be sure to compare what you were hired for and what you are currently doing. Also include the hours required to complete the tasks in your expanded scope. If everyone there is working 50-60 hours on salary you will not get much sympathy for the extra hours. When everything is in place go to your manager or boss and be sure that he/she understands how much your job has changed. Presumably everything your are doing is important to the companies current goals. Asking for "mo money" is up to you but don't demand unless you have a secondary plan (such as a nest egg or other job offer). You will actually be doing a sales presentation as to why your job is worth more to the company. Done correctly the manager will get the hint without directly asking for a salary increase.

    Sometimes one has to pay dues to reap the benefits later. You will have to assess, based on your managers response, as to what those future benefits could be and how the situation might change. This approach will give you and the company time to sort it out; give it a month or whatever you are comfortable with. You always have the option of deciding the answer to the above questions is no and at that time you can begin your job search in earnest.

  31. Same as anything else... by evilviper · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is the most basic part of being employed. You walk into your manager's office, close the door, point out how many new, important, and unwanted responsibilities you now have.

    How confrontational you want to get is up to you, and largely depends on how willing you are to quit. You can take the soft approach, and just say you think a raise is in order, or else you'd prefer to relinquish your new duties, and sit quietly, hoping he comes back with a reasonable figure. Alternatively, if it's worth playing chicken with your job, you can name a figure, and be intractable when he tries to say how little money they have, and names some lower figure instead.

    Personally, I'm a bit more of a pain in the ass... I don't believe in arm-twisting my employer every time they should be doing the right thing. If they can't figure out I've done a hell of a lot for them, and compensate me appropriately, I'm finding another job ASAP, and giving my two weeks' notice. Of course that invariably results in a counter-offer, but I simply turn them down flat, since they've shown their lack of respect for me every day up to that point. They're probably just looking to keep me on for a couple months, until they can find and train someone a bit cheaper, and then fire me without warning. Continuing to work for an employer who isn't doing good by you, without having to be asked (or threatened) constantly, is idiotic.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  32. Career path by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is absolutely nothing wrong with talking openly and honestly about your career path with your boss. It's practically the #1 thing he's there for. The text goes something like this: "I took this job because I believe in the company and want to help it accomplish its goals. I come to work every day ready to do whatever it takes to help the company achieve these goals, and can point to all these responsibilities that are far outside my job description to back that claim up. I will be honest with you, though, I took the job I did because working in IT is not my passion. It's not what drives me. When I was working in IT I felt frustrated and unfulfilled. I still believe in the company and still want to help, but I need your help. I need you to show me what my career path looks like from here. Where is all this work taking me?" There are some general answers to expect: The company will get the resources on this timeline. If that's the case, you can point out that they should report to you. You can also make a point of asking on a weekly or monthly basis how the company's plan is proceeding. You might get a response that basically says "I can't show you a path." That's a very honest thing to be told, and the sign of a great manager. That's his way of saying "If I were you, I'd find another job." That's not his fault, it's almost certainly a decision being made above his pay grade. You might get a response that says that they need your technical skills a lot more than your human skills. This usually leads to a frank talk about what the compensation package would generally look like if you went this way. If it's good, then you're being offered a lot of money for a job you'll hate. If not, then the best answer for all parties is for you to find another job, and possibly help them find someone with a real passion for IT to replace you. It's also worth thinking for a bit ... does the company have a CTO? Does it need one? Do you have what it takes to be that CTO? Also, how much do you trust this company to repay your hard work? How much visibility do higher-ups have into your situation?

    Don't threaten and stay positive even if you are heading out. Honestly helps as long as you are being honest about positive things - what you want, what the company needs, what the company can offer.

    1. Re:Career path by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is absolutely nothing wrong with talking openly and honestly about your career path with your boss. It's practically the #1 thing he's there for.

      Ah HAHAHAHAHAhahahahahahahahahahahaha ha ha ha!! Really, that's a good one.

  33. Horizontal drift by Kjella · · Score: 1

    I think I recognize this story, most likely they got other people that can be an Online Content Producer but probably no one to be their web/IT-guru. So you get squeezed into that role, but do you know what happens when the times get better? They hire more writers and you don't get to return because you're the one that knows all the systems and everything. Trust me there's always some immediate concern which means they need you and your institutional knowledge even though they say it's only temporary. The part I'm not so sure of is whether you'd just like better recognition and pay for it, or if it's that you don't want to do it, because you got limited playing room and can't pursue both at once.

    If you want to move up, at the very least go to your boss and say that with all the responsibility you're taking you'd like a better title, but then you're pretty much branding yourself in the direction you say you don't want to go. If you really want to be a writer, then maybe having that on your CV isn't such a bad thing even if you did lots of other non-writing activity? Wait for the economy to get a little better then get a job that actually matches your job description. I don't think being a little honest with your employer hurts either, that yes you can manage the job but this is not the sort of work that makes you happy. Managers with a clue will understand what this means, you have the professional ethics to do it but you'll be leaving for another position if this goes on. And even if you have a bad manager, they don't like to cut important staff either because normally during a downturn they don't get to rehire, so lots of headache for them making things go round. Except the even more irrational ones, but then you probably don't want to work there anyway...

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  34. Why work for a company that's about to go belly up by Giometrix · · Score: 1

    I don't understand why you'd even consider staying at a company that seems to be going down the gutter anyway...

    You seem to be a valuable employee; if it shined through on Slashdot it'll shine through in your resume and interviews. The economy's not THAT bad, start sending out your resume because this job isn't going lead you anywhere good.

    --
    Download free e-books, lectures, and tutorials at bookgoldmine.com
  35. Get Real by gabeman-o · · Score: 1

    Everyone has job responsibilities that exceed their original job description. Your choices are to either wait for your annual review and ensure that you get recognized/rewarded or to look for a new job. If you start asking for a raise, don't be surprised if you find yourself out of a job. If choose to look for a new job, your resume will be a bit beefier. Tread lightly.

  36. no easy path by Nite_Hawk · · Score: 1

    At least from my experience there is no real easy path. Every significant pay raise I've gotten has been because I've applied for and accepted a new job. Sometimes with the same company and sometimes with another. The most bizarre was the transition from my previous position to my current one. Basically I wanted a 20% raise because I was being significantly underpaid. The only way for me to get it was to apply for another roughly equivalent job at the same organization, stop all work on the projects I was doing, and start working on entirely new projects. I was hired into the new job and got my raise, but the organization had to replace me and ended up paying the new guy what I was asking for anyway. The kicker is that he more or less ended up starting over from scratch and a years worth of work was thrown away. No one batted an eye at any of it though. These days it just seems to be the way things are done. If you want to advance you have to keep moving and not stay anywhere too long. Perhaps some day I'll find a place where they want to keep employees and find ways to let them advance in a saner manner, but I haven't found it yet.

    1. Re:no easy path by noc007 · · Score: 1

      This is what I don't understand about companies. Their big overall focus are profits and wasting money hurts those profits. Rarely do they see any value in an employee's knowledge and experience with the company. They can't possibly give Employee_A a decent raise who knows their job well and how the company does business; however, if Employee_A leaves, then they end up hiring Employee_B for the same or more than Employee_A was asking and they still need to train/bring the noob up to speed. Worse, in some cases, they have to hire 2-5 people just to replace Employee_A.
      THIS IS WHY WE CAN'T HAVE NICE THINGS!

      My story: I worked for an on-shore outsourcing company and was on a team exclusive to a particular client. My primary job was to handle UNIX and Oracle support and secondary was everything else a sys/net admin does. This was one of the rare instances that my IT job actually generated a traceable profit for my employer; each ticket was billed for a certain price that was common knowledge among my peers, though this knowledge didn't help morale with the peanuts we were making.

      In a cost cutting move, they decided to move all of our jobs from the major metropolitan city to a hick, I mean, farm town three hours south. They really wanted me to stay since I had an in depth knowledge on my exclusive job roles and everyone elses' jobs, plus I had saved their ass on countless occasions with detailed knowledge of the client's policies and procedures and could always back it up with documentation. Their pitch to everyone was the cost of living was cheaper down there. That was a load of crap since my car, credit cards, and cell phone bills wouldn't go down, also my rent and utilities would go up since I had two roommates. Knowing full well that they'd cut my pay if I moved and I'd be miserable there, I countered with two options. Option one was keep my pay and bonus options and I would work remotely; this wasn't much of a risk on their part since performance was already measured by the tickets one processed. Option two, was a double in pay to compensate for the increase of living expenses, being three hours away from friends and family, and having to live in a shithole.

      They didn't take either offer and instead hired four slackers that previously worked as tech-support for the local dial-up ISP. Their only real skill was playing EVE Online. They handled my exclusive support roles. All in all, they hired over double the work force to replace the team I was on and ended up spending more money on combined wages. IIRC, they ended up loosing money since the client couldn't trust them to get stuff done right and started to pull out.

  37. Look for a new job and see if they will counter by rlh100 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    After asking for a raise and being refused, go look for a new job describing your current skills. When you find one, ask for what you think you are worth. You will likely get close to it. Take the offer back to your current company and see if they will match it. They would be idiots to not match it, but they will probably be idiots.

    The job market is expanding at this point. Go for it.

    RLH

  38. Get a new job by spiffmastercow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The only way I've ever managed to get a proportional raise was to get a new job. Companies don't like to give out raises, and prefer to hire someone for more rather than promote from within. It's ass-backwards, but that's the way the world works.

    1. Re:Get a new job by NateE · · Score: 1

      Exactly! Any big salary increase requires switching to a new employer.

    2. Re:Get a new job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  39. Too late. by fm6 · · Score: 1

    First you give a long list of add-on responsibilities you got because the company doesn't have any money. Then you ask us how to get more money. The question answers itself, really.

    Yes, it's not fair. Yes, it would be stupid of them not to do their best to hang onto you, now that so much is dependent on you. So what? Tech companies, especially tech companies in trouble, are not known for their fairness or smarts. No matter how you go about asking, there can be only one answer: "the money's just not there."

    Not that it matters. This company is clearly circling the drain.

  40. Leave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just leave. A company that pulls this stuff is the typical short-sighted, narrow-minded organization that wants one person to manage their websites, support, network, database, and everything. It's never worth it to deal with idiots like this. Let me guess, it's a small company right? Probably family-owned? Your boss is probably a nephew/son/brother of the owner, right?

    You can't win a situation like this. The company has already proven that it can't value talent, and doesn't care about employees because they shovel about 5 or 6 different jobs on one guy, without compensating him appropriately. This kind of bullshit only happens in IT; you'd never see someone try to get their Accounting department to also do Sales, or Marketing to do HR. But in IT, people are so clueless that they will hire one person to be a programmer/dba/sysadmin/helpdesk and pay them the lowest salary of all the jobs combined. Or, worse, they'll advertise for an "IT Manager" or "Director of Technology" and then you find out that you're the only person in the department and you're responsible for everything.

  41. Nervous breakdown by dsoltesz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a nervous breakdown waiting to happen.

    Listen to the folks telling you to slow down and prioritize. Have a friendly talk with your boss about a promotion to go with the new responsibilities. Ask for help (even if you do not need it) from your boss prioritizing your responsibilities so you can get the most important things done in your 40 hours... this discussion will accomplish several things: your boss will understand exactly what and how much you have on your plate, you make it clear working more than 40 hours long-term is not desirable, hopefully some of your shit tasks get delegated elsewhere, and finally, you get some important satisfaction knowing you are making an effort to get control of the situation. Frankly, it sounds like you are on a sinking ship. If so, make a plan to get off the boat voluntarily.

    If the situation does not improve, this is headed a very ugly direction. Stress can destroy your health, and burnout can last for years (perhaps a lifetime). I don't have words to describe how painful and destructive stress and burnout really are. Just take my word for it: Don't go there.

    1. Re:Nervous breakdown by jskoda · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can create a vicious cycle of burnout if you are not careful. You'll finally escape the old job with its overly demanding schedule and poor salary for a new job with a better salary and more reasonable task list. You're new job euphoria can put you in situations where you pick up extra work or some other duties because you're happy not to be in the old job and the manager at the new job wouldn't take advantage of you... You basically put yourself back into a burnout position grinding away until you find another new job with a better salary where you'll start out with more reasonable taskings, until you sign up for too much there too. The several posts here that suggest you take care of yourself are dead on! Listen to them. When you're hired into a position, that's the role you play and only deviate from the role for extremely good reasons and only for temporary taskings.

    2. Re:Nervous breakdown by jskoda · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Getting burned out in one job can set you up for getting burned out in the next one as well. You become so happy that you aren't in your old job that you sign up for things and extra work in the new one because the new people/management are nice and you want to show how appreciative you are that you've with them and not in your old job, until you realize that you're back in the same type of situation: too much to do and not enough time/money to accomplish the tasks.

  42. Ask, and always keep an eye out for another job by khchung · · Score: 1

    I was handed the role of pseudo project manager to make sure the developer stayed on course with the project's due date.

    ...

    Needless to say I want to ask for more money, as well as more resources (as well as a better title that fits my roles), but what is the best way to go about this?

    You have been in the role of PM, so you got to have enough people skill by now, why don't you "just" go ahead and really ask your boss for more money? Of course, I understand it is more than "just" go and ask, you need to be prepared, that's where the 2nd part comes in: always keep an eye out for another job.

    Without keeping an eye on the job market, you wouldn't know how much you can get from another job. "Keeping an eye out" doesn't mean you apply for any job that looks like a match, but you need to know what people pay for someone doing what you have been/are doing now.

    Equipped with knowledge of the market, you can honestly and confidently approach your boss and say "I have been doing role X for the past Y months and it seems I will continue to do so in the near future. I think it would be best if my job title and compensation would be adjusted accordingly. I understand that in the market, role X usually pays around $XXX-XXX. It would be acceptable to me if my pay is adjusted to similar levels."

    If your boss say no, accept gracefully and end the meeting, no need to argue. DON'T play any tricks or sabotage your work. Do your job as you always had, that's what being "professional" is about. BUT actively seek another job immediately, and make no fuss about it. When you found another job that pays what you want, jump ship ASAP without regrets. Don't waste time with your current boss even if he offers to pay more now, he has just proven to you that he won't be giving you any raise unless you leave, you wouldn't want to do that again in 2-3 years' time.

    What if you are unable to find another job that pays what you want? That means you really are asking too much. Either reduce what you have asking for, or accept your current job with the understanding you are not underpaid.

    Whatever outcome, you will have no need to resent your situation anymore. That will be good.

    --
    Oliver.
  43. This guy is not flamebait by Weaselmancer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He's spot on. He could have phrased it more delicately, but honestly you could use a little shaking up.

    That's what your job has evolved into, and that is the pay. Arm twisting will accomplish nothing for you except a quick trip to the street. They're broke. You've already said so. That's why they're laying off all the people you've replaced and have no budget for staff.

    You try to go oil drilling with these guys and you won't get a thing except a fresh new bullseye on your back.

    My advice? Talk them into a title change only. Emphasize you're not digging for a raise, but you'd like something to reflect your new duties. Get your new impressive title, then bust ass for the next 3 months to get settled in with your new title. Then get your ass to careerbuilder and craigslist and use your new fancy title to negotiate a better job. These guys are garden variety passive aggressives PHBs that will continue to dump on you until you break. Ditch them.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:This guy is not flamebait by ktappe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's what your job has evolved into, and that is the pay. Arm twisting will accomplish nothing for you except a quick trip to the street. They're broke. You've already said so. That's why they're laying off all the people you've replaced and have no budget for staff.

      You try to go oil drilling with these guys and you won't get a thing except a fresh new bullseye on your back.

      My advice? Talk them into a title change only. Emphasize you're not digging for a raise, but you'd like something to reflect your new duties. Get your new impressive title, then bust ass for the next 3 months to get settled in with your new title. Then get your ass to careerbuilder and craigslist and use your new fancy title to negotiate a better job. These guys are garden variety passive aggressives PHBs that will continue to dump on you until you break. Ditch them.

      Not horrible advice but I'd advocate he back off his hours a bit. He's being paid for 40 hours and they're expecting 60-80. I don't care how you cut it, that's not fair. But further, it's also going to have notably adverse affects on his job performance as well as personal life. You want him to be seeking other jobs? When? That type of schedule completely precludes a job search. I think he needs to level with them that they're paying him for 40 hours, and he is willing to put in some OT but cannot maintain a 60+ hour workweek. As long as he is not asking for more $, they might accept that. If they don't, at least he took the moral high road.

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
  44. Just ask for a better title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't go for more money, go for a better title. Vp of something. How can they deny it? Does not make sense. This will make you better suited to find another job and they will know it and will likely pay you more money when they can afford to.

    However, if you do not want to do IT then you should just find another job.

  45. what is said and what is true by Tumbleweed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I received a raise after that, but my manager told me he had to fight tooth and nail to get me 3%.

    This is a pretty common thing for managers to do. Give you the minimum they think you'll accept, and say they went to the mat "for you". Right. It *might* be true, but I seriously doubt it.

    1. Re:what is said and what is true by gink1 · · Score: 1

      I certainly agree - that's just one of the many, many games they play with Engineers to keep salaries down and to give the majority of the pay increase pool to a few "special" members.

      Most companies I've been with have just been variants on this theme.

      But right now my attitude about it is better than it would have been.

      1. I am currently working.

      2. 3% may be chicken feed but it beats the alternatives hand down - such as pay cuts for some needed purpose, 0% or No position.

      3. I actually enjoy the work I do. (But I probably should not advertise that too much).

    2. Re:what is said and what is true by Mana+Mana · · Score: 0

      >>I received a raise after that, but my manager told me he had to fight tooth and nail to get me 3%.
      >
      >This is a pretty common thing for managers to do. Give you the minimum they think you'll accept, and say they went >to the mat "for you". Right. It *might* be true, but I seriously doubt it.

      I've said "citation needed, please," with a Cheshire smile. Gets them thinking 'bout my thinkin' 'bout their motivations. Fucking with their minds as they attempted to fuck with mine keeps them off balance. If nothing else they have to up their game and thus I've yet to see the motherfucker who can rise to the challenge with poise! Henceforth they become transparent when they -must- shift mental gears whilst staring at your half suppressed elfin smile. IOW, they become nervous their spiel is transparent to you and they're easy to read. Try it, cultivate it, you'll thank me.

  46. Focus on promotion, not a raise by carlzum · · Score: 1
    If the company is reducing staff, asking for a raise won't go over too well. If you can find a better offer, take it or let your current employer counter. Don't expect anyone to pay you more if no one else is willing to. Use this opportunity to improve your skills and demonstrate your value to the company. Again, if they don't give you what you're worth, another company will.

    You're not alone, fair or not, all companies expect employees to continually improve productivity. The ones that do are retained, those that can't are not. The job market is cut-throat, out-perform your peers, keep your skills sharp, and make sure your resume is up to date and being seen.

  47. That happens all the time. by khasim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Understand it and plan for it.

    Keep your resume up-to-date and USE it. Shop yourself around at least every year to see what you're really worth and what job skills you should be working on.

    The good thing about situations like that is that they look GREAT on your resume. Just work on the narrative and explain how you took on more responsibilities as the needs of your employer changed.

    1. Re:That happens all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course my other thought is that I'd much rather go back to writing and working with marketing than getting back into IT."

      In the end, this is what matters. Do what you really want to be doing. It will save you the stress that will eventually take its toll on you and those around you. And save you from having that heart attack one Monday morning.

    2. Re:That happens all the time. by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Understand it and plan for it.

      Keep your resume up-to-date and USE it. Shop yourself around at least every year to see what you're really worth and what job skills you should be working on.

      The good thing about situations like that is that they look GREAT on your resume. Just work on the narrative and explain how you took on more responsibilities as the needs of your employer changed.

      Exactly. This is why a title upgrade, even if you can't get a raise, is very valuable. Your resume will show advancement; and you can make a very compelling story around how you kept doing more and now were looking for the next opportunity (and more money). In this economy, guerilla tactics are even more useful - bide your time, build up your strengths, and attack when the odds are in your favor. Once the market picks up, you can decide what move to make; until then keep a paycheck and build your resume. Look for opportunities to add skills in areas where you want to work; look at them as paid training. Your present employer will probably never pay you what the going rate is, so enjoy the ride and develop the skills and titles to make the jump when you can.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    3. Re:That happens all the time. by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Ahh career advice from someone who still thinks titles are important.

      You are definitely the guy to listen to!

      My personal opinion ... if the title matters, you don't want the job. When people care about titles they don't actually know what they are doing in general and more often than not, don't actually DO anything.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    4. Re:That happens all the time. by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Ahh career advice from someone who still thinks titles are important.

      You are definitely the guy to listen to!

      My personal opinion ... if the title matters, you don't want the job. When people care about titles they don't actually know what they are doing in general and more often than not, don't actually DO anything.

      It may not matter in your world; but in the real world titles do matter. A hiring manager has very little time to decide whether or not to interview a candidate, and a succession of promotions and increasing responsibilities catch your eye. That gets you in the door; then you can convince the manager you can do your job.

      Yes, I realize a 24 year old VP of XX is probably pure BS and barely knows how to wipe his ass; but then again part of the job of hiring is to separate the wheat from the chaff. In the end, it's about getting your resume considered amongst the pile that comes in. Advancement is one part of that.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  48. Strategic Incompetence by Zorlon · · Score: 1

    You need to read Scott Adams' "The Joy of Work." If you really want to write articles and be in Marketing don't volunteer to do IT stuff. Clearly, your strategy of "quick and courteous service" (see page 40) is not working out for you.

    --
    - Things are the way they are because they're coded that way -
  49. Spiraling Job Responsibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the big problems in the job market right now is the flood of talent - well, people, some with talent some without.

    This gives companies both big and small a high number of applicants to sort through in resume and interview.

    Unless you have some skill or ability to make your resume stand out, or know someone in a company that can give you an in via recommendation or referral, you become a number calculated by IMO the following in the order listed

    (1) age and length of possible employment term - younger individuals in IT or related fields have a tendancy to hop to try and get more money at the next job - employers look for the long term more often than the short term unless it's a project

    (2) financial requirements - salary, benefits, etc. all calculate into the end budget - people wonder why companies go through contractors - well, guess what, for a position paying $20 an hour and a contractor charging $30 an hour to supply labor, the company still saves between $10 and $30 per hour depending on the benefit package offered to a full-time employee

    (3) skill set - notice this is last - hate to say it but the tech bubble over the past decade accompanied by numerous people who "play" at home with systems and networks including domain level managed by MS and Linux servers offers companies a choice now which really was never in the market place before - do we pay more for someone with work experience, or do we pay less for someone who knows what they're doing but doesn't have the resume to show it - the deciding point there is the size of the company as smaller companies are willing to take a risk on someone with less job history but knowledge since they do not have as many standardized requirements to meet and can allow changes in their systems to meet the skill set of a new IT employee

    The real point in the whole situation is your statement "I'd much rather go back to writing and working with marketing than getting back into IT". Speaking from personal experience, some IT professionals don't mind the extra responsibilites and workload - we're nuts to begin with since we enjoy working with computers...:-)...so going at a challenge which may take extra hours in a week is not something we turn away from because we enjoy what we're doing every day. Bosses sometimes expect if you are perofrming IT duties you wouldn't mind doing more because of this outlook in the market - or they are IT idiots who don't realize the amount of work some systems take to implient or maintain.

        If you aren't having fun or look forward to the end of your day so you can get out of the office, either talk to your boss(es) and explain you wouldn't mind helping but it's not really what you want to do. You could even - if inclined - map out an outline of what they are asking you to do including the number of hours a day/week you expect it to take. Create a separate outline of what you currently do for your regular position. Show them the hour total and explain what they are asking of you. If they don't listen, they don't care about and you shouldn't wait until the end of the day to leave the office.

    Good luck!

  50. seek compensation not pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pay raises are hard to justify, but so is replacing someone who is doing a great job. The case to draw is the current load of work in comparison to a fair market value. Don't specifically seek more money, but maybe comp time for every hour over 48 hours you work in a week, with a pre-determined buy out price once per year if they don't want to have you take the vacation. How about a better parking space, company car, I even have heard of a telemarketing firm who hired a full time masseuse instead of pay raises one year, and everyone was happy with the new "value" their job was given. Unless what you need is more money, talk to them about the value of your current role, and what can be done to bring your title and compensation in-line with this position.

  51. Learn to say "NO". Scale down your responsibilitie by melted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Learn to say "NO". Scale down your responsibilities. Be diplomatic about it. Basically every now and then ask your boss, "I have X, Y and Z on my plate but I only have time for two of the three. Which one do we want to drop, outsource, have someone else do?" That's how you get your life back—through careful budgeting and time management.

    Face it, it's better to do a good job on two things than shitty job on three. This is probably the reason why you didn't get promoted—as a rule, people don't get promoted for doing shitty work.

    Your task is to have enough diplomatic skill to explain this to your management without it reflecting negatively on you as a professional.

  52. Best advice depends on level of trust of employer. by paper+tape · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you implicitly trust your boss and your employer to be fair, go to them and explain the situation, that you feel you're being taken advantage of, and ask how you can work together to address that.

    If you have any lower level of trust, immediately start looking for work. When you find a new job and give notice, do NOT take an offer to stay on if they match the offer at your new job.

    My last job, I was an 'indispensable man' keeping the tech end of a small company together. I did not in any way, shape, or form, trust the management or owners of the company. For various reasons, I decided it was time to move on, found a new job, and gave notice. They immediately offered to match what I would be making at the new job (a 30% raise over what I had been making). I declined politely, worked my two weeks and left. They hired my predecessor back, at the same salary I had left for, and gave another employee a large raise to stay... and then cut both their salaries by a third 6 weeks later.

    Had I stayed, the same would have happened to me - I'd have given up what has turned out to be a dream job for me, in exchange for continuing to work for people I didn't trust, for pretty much the same money (once it was too late and the opportunity to move was gone).

  53. My take... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Line up a job first. Then, talk with your direct managers about a pay raise/title change. Approach it as a "sale". Provide supporting data.

    Your manager in turn needs to sale your "promotions" up the chain, so he/she need ammo.

    I am not sure it is a good idea to mention you already have a job. The new job should at least already be comparable to what you have currently, so what's the point of bringing it up?

    If your manager/company does not play ball,leave, but do it professionally.

  54. Toast by drmofe · · Score: 1

    Find another job. Anyone going in to major online content provision with minimal budget as described doesn't understand the problem.

  55. You are a resource by buzzn · · Score: 1

    Do not take this personally. You are someone doing a job. Yes, you think you should be paid fairly for that work, but the company will willingly pay you far less than you are worth, if you are willing. There are two ways to fix this: walk, or negotiate. Negotiating may end up forcing you out -- a lot depends on your attitude, and what are the actual intentions of the company. So if you have any interest in keeping the current job, make a plan B, which is figure out where you would go if the negotiation fails. Futhermore, interviewing elsewhere will let you know what you are actually worth on the open market. And who knows, you may find a job you like far better. Do not threaten. It's business. Also, you say: "With budget cuts and layoffs..." Um, your company may be imploding. Why do you want to stay there? Look around. Believe me, you do not want to stick to a ship that is sinking. I've been there and it is not pretty.

    --
    Join the window installer's union, where prosperity is a brick throw away!
  56. Deal with it. by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 1

    Like it or not, right now employment is a "buyer's market." If you can find a more satisfying job with better pay then go for it, otherwise, one of the perks of working where you are working right now is that you aren't unemployed.

    Perhaps if and when the economy improves you will be in a better position to negotiate in your favor.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    1. Re:Deal with it. by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 1

      True, but in the last couple of cycles I've noticed that the mere knowledge that a change is on its way is enough to have a bit of an effect on the economy.

      --
      Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  57. Re:Learn to say "NO". Scale down your responsibili by Tanuki64 · · Score: 1

    Face it, it's better to do a good job on two things than shitty job on three. This is probably the reason why you didn't get promoted--as a rule, people don't get promoted for doing shitty work.

    This is not what I see everywhere I go. At least in Germany: Do a shitty job. Else you chances of promotion are slim. The incompetenter you are the better.

  58. I was in this same situaton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was in this position... and tried what you are thinking, ended up on unemployment line.... 3 months later found a new job with better pay, less responsibility. My 2 cents... ask for what you want, don't back down, be polite, and update your resume, and start shopping for a new spot. :p

    1. Re:I was in this same situaton by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

      Yes. You should ask for a raise and a job title change.
      Just go through exactly what you said in your post: ...That you have taken on responsibilities that formerly were performed by,
      what is it, 3 other people.

      If that fails, then like someone said, fallback to asking for the title change only,
      and start looking for another job. That being said, make sure the new title you ask
      for is the kind of work you want in your next job.

      --

      Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
  59. You said it yourself by tftp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course my other thought is that I'd much rather go back to writing and working with marketing than getting back into IT.

    If that's what you really want, then that's what you should be working toward. IT is a thankless, 24/7 routine where you do well if nothing happens; and since nothing happens there is sometimes a belief of some managers that you aren't really doing anything. Writing and working with marketing is far better in this aspect (and in many others.) Besides, if you become a reluctant IT guy you will eventually lose your writing skills; you won't be marketable for what you love to do, and you won't be a great IT guy either. You need experience in your chosen field if you want to develop professionally, and if you don't want a career in IT then don't go for it. If the company doesn't want you any more in the writing/marketing position then look for another job before it's too late.

  60. Title bump is most important by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

    Fight for the title bump, and let them keep the cash. The title bump helps when you're applying for the next job.

    Your current employer appears to be having money problems, so they're not going to be able to give much of a raise. That's probably a lost cause unless they bring in more revenue.

  61. "times are tough" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was in the unfortunate position to get acquired just before my first year when I should have gotten a raise. Immediately after that our company froze salary raises - for us at the bottom of the totem pole only, obviously. I've been working for 2 1/2 years without a raise not to mention the 3 months i spent as an intern (bitch). Recently during my year appraisal I brought the raise situation up and all my boss could say is "Yeah, two years and no raise is kind of a drag". I wanted to say, "More like two and a half full time, and three months interning puts me at almost three years". And the response I got was a sheepish lie saying "Well, yeah we've tried to ask upper management and until things get better we aren't doing any raises." Time to look for another job that's what that tells me. Since when does an entry level position become the person in charge of creating a release package that hundreds of customers have been paying thousands of dollars for??? I love the type of work that I do but if this is the type of bs I have to fight through I seriously might reconsider my line of work.

    1. Re:"times are tough" by orkysoft · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No raise means they're paying you less each year, due to inflation.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    2. Re:"times are tough" by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      If everyone stopped giving out raises because of inflation, there would be no inflation.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  62. "Do I get paid more?" by SheeEttin · · Score: 1

    Boss: "Hey Joe, our old webmaster died/resigned/etc. Would you mind taking over for him?"
    Joe: "Do I get paid more?"

    You can take it from there, depending on the boss' answer.

    1. Re:"Do I get paid more?" by noc007 · · Score: 1

      Must be nice that you've been asked if you want to pick up someone else's responsibilities. I've always been told "this is what you'll be doing as well" or "since you've been cross-trained on their duties and they're now gone, you'll need to handle their stuff as well".

      Any questions about a pay increase for compensation for doing 2+peoples jobs would either flag me for termination at a later date, not being a "team player", or "money hungry".

      I never understood upper management's labeling of someone wanting to make more money when they're at <=$35k. Pardon me for wanting to be more than two paychecks away from bankruptcy and be able to save up for a car that can actually get me to and from work. Plus it's a bit hypocritical coming from an upper management a-hole who makes six figures and has a shiny Range Rover in their parking spot.

  63. If you need a resume by symbolset · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you need a resume then you're doing it wrong. Make a name for yourself and sell your name - the whole time you're employed. If your status changes from "unavailable" to "?" on your website, FB and Linkedin and you don't have a dozen offers of employment in 24 hours, then you've failed. If your friends in the industry keep touch many of them are checking to see if you're available now because really you're not that interesting but they get a spiff for bringing you in. If you're selling yourself properly then you're happy where you are and you still get 4-8 unconditional offers a year, and dozens of inquiries that might be. You can call around to your friends if you get desperate, but then you're in a weak position. All else is fluff.

    You don't own the vanity web domain that is your name? You don't use it to advertise your self? So sad for you. What were you thinking? Maybe you don't belong in tech. That's a grand placement for a blog that shows off your achievements, your knowledge, your puissance, your value. I bought my name (though it's now a flat page and not a blog). Everybody I know did that. If you enter my proper name in Google, the first hit is the page I want you to see, and most of the entire rest of it is links to public sites where I aired my carefully considered forward thinking opinion - and a few hits are to a scary guy who shares my name but most obviously isn't me even though he lives near me (damn you FencePost!) I googled me just now, and that's how it is. Most of us did it several different ways. A domain is like ten bucks a year. Come on: if you can't invest that much in yourself, what's somebody going to think?

    Hint: people are going to "Google" you before they offer you a job. The output associated with your name should be interesting, forward looking, and non-toxic. The Internet being what it is, you don't get to revoke output associated tightly with your name so if you're prone to stupid, racist, sexist or obscure arguments while posting sober or impaired, it's best if you use a pseudonym while doing that so you don't make yourself unemployable. It's probably best to have a general alt to use for your common activity, and post under your real name only in your most careful, sober and considered capacity. Unfortunately this guidance is far too late for me, but hopefully my strengths overcome my Internet shortcomings and my learning will educate others.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:If you need a resume by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      people are going to "Google" you before they offer you a job. The output associated with your name should be interesting, forward looking, and non-toxic. The Internet being what it is, you don't get to revoke output associated tightly with your name so if you're prone to stupid, racist, sexist or obscure arguments while posting sober or impaired, it's best if you use a pseudonym while doing that so you don't make yourself unemployable.

      Oh great! My real name is Ano N. Coward! I'm screwed for life!

  64. Start interviewing by OrangeTide · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have three friends who have successfully gone the route of starting with interviews and letting the rumors start. If you can secure an offer from another company for significantly more you can either jump ship or let your current place match the offer. One friend of mine got a pretty significant raise this way, after having to suffer with a pretty significant pay cut last year he's above his original salary then bump all of his coworkers up too. He wondered the point of the salary cuts, when the company gave in so quickly to pressure.

    The only trick to it, is you have to be serious about taking the other offer. You must be in the mind set that you will walk away when deal doesn't meet your requirements, and it is important to think about what those requirements really are before you negotiate.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Start interviewing by MartinSchou · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A friend of mine did something similar, but different.

      He took at 25% pay cut (from a very good salary mind you) just to get back to a 40 hours/week job again. The employer he was at offered him a raise to stay, but he made it quite clear that he didn't need more money - he needed more time for himself.

      And since they weren't willing to hire extra people to cover the 60 hours/week he was working, he left. According to him, the letter of recommendation he received wasn't really one. Just said he worked there for 3.5 years and stated his title.

      Both things just makes him laugh and smile - he's quite happy he took the pay cut. If he hadn't, the new company couldn't have afforded him, and he'd likely have been at least one nervous breakdown richer.

      Moral of the story: Money isn't worth crap, if the process of acquiring them is going to kill you.

    2. Re:Start interviewing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. I walked away from an 80/hr - 110/hr a week job that paid very well (I thought) because I was basically on the verge of a nervous breakdown. On the other hand I have gotten offers from places that pay the same as that insane start-up, so now I question if what they were offering was really all that significant. And when I added up what I really made at the job before the one "that paid very well" I realize that while the base is high the total was not.

      The point is, I think if you play your cards right it is possible to have a big salary and a life. Getting a big salary doesn't give any company the right to suck the life out of you, and you shouldn't have to take a pay cut to negotiate fair treatment.

  65. think this out by tincat2 · · Score: 1

    sounds like what you really need to do is a realistic appraisal of if and when these guys are going into the toilet. you're still on board because you are willing and able to do the grunt work of what appears to be a grab for salvation by a shaky enterprise. even if you get an agreement for more money, it won't last long if things go south. try to quietly line up something else and go w/ a nice resume enhancing title(they'll probably see that as getting over on you so it may just fly). more money from a weak company in this economy is a non starter.

  66. look for a new job... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm in the same situation. That's what I'm doing.

  67. Re:Learn to say "NO". Scale down your responsibili by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The incompetenter you are the better."

    You must be the CEO?

  68. Not entirely fair to the rest of IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There are plenty of really bad managers like mister myopic above. If his boss was any good and heard about it, it should mean instant firing and blackballing, because for a manager to fail his responsibilities (of finding and retaining the best people for the job he's tasked to make happen) this badly means we're dealing with an incompetent manager, and few things are more destructive to the company.

    But such is not at all exclusive to IT. What makes it worse in IT, however, is that an awful lot of things happen "behind the scenes". It's a bit in the nature of the thing: If you do your job well everything goes without a hitch and since IT takes the form of supporting infrastructure, it's taken for granted.

    I now have a "manager" of sorts, who cast my use of FreeBSD with X and an idiosyncratic choice for a WM for the desktop (allowed as a sign-on incentive by the owner/CEO) as failing social obligations in this small company. What he really was hinting at is that he's no idea what I'm doing with all those black background xterms and that this somehow was different from the white background application the rest of the php/css/html writers are using to do much the same thing. This somehow stands out despite the guy having no technical clue whatsoever. He is a pretty good salesman/customer care functionary/credit controller and has the good sense to double-check his promises before making them if he can. It's not a direct problem now but I'm keeping an eye on it and if it becomes one I'll be gone in an eyeblink.

    But the point is that this not understanding also contributes to taking functioning IT infrastructure for granted, meaning that the people who make it happen don't get no respect because nobody notices their labours.

    So, it behooves us to take up the slack where clueless management and brass are leaving it and report to them regularly that everything is fine and document very finely in language they can understand ("from a business perspective") just how much work it was that allowed this to be so. If you need to, you can add graphic explanations of what didn't happen, but would have had you not been there. Note that this is quite different from the usual "so many processes, so many records processed" tick box paperwork that perl was invented for to generate.

    After establishing that, well, hopefully you have built a good relationship with the people who have paying authority and you can negotiate. Not necessairily Korben Dallas style, but negotiating is the name of the game. Harvard uni press has a couple good books on the theory, but for practice something like Jim Thomas' _Negotiate to Win_ is much more directly helpful.

  69. what not to do by John_Sauter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I hope my story will serve as a cautionary tale. In 1995 I was hired as the junior person in a two-person IT department. My boss immediately began training me so I could cover for her during vacations and illnesses, and of course she covered for me.

    In 2005 she left abruptly. Because her departure was unexpected I naturally began to do her job in addition to my own, just as I did when she took vacation. I also asked for a temporary salary bump to compensate me for the added responsibility, until either (a) I got a promotion to the senior position and someone was hired into the junion position, or (b) someone was hired to replace her. Because of our longevity we were both at the top of our grade in salary, but the bottom of her grade was above the top of mine, so a bump to the bottom of her grade would have meant an increase for me.

    After six months of being rebuffed I concluded that they were happy with the status quo: they were getting what had historically been a two-person job at the price of one junior salary. I felt put upon, because I was no longer able to take vacation.

    Here is where I made my mistake: I became obstinate, and declared that I would no longer do the jobs that had historically been the responsibility of the senior person. Within a week I was unemployed.

    Be smarter than I was. There is some good advice in this thread, which I wish had been available to me.

    1. Re:what not to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What's the moral of your story? Looks to me like that wasn't a place you would want to work no matter which way you look at it.

    2. Re:what not to do by John_Sauter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What's the moral of your story? Looks to me like that wasn't a place you would want to work no matter which way you look at it.

      If I had been smarter, I would have found a way to return to persuade them that two people were required for the job: myself as the senior person, and a new hire as the junior person. After 10 years of training, I could have retired with a nice pension due to 20 years of service.

      The nice thing about a long-term internal support job is you get to know all of your customers personally.

    3. Re:what not to do by Aladrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, no, you couldn't have. If you could have, they wouldn't have rebuffed you for 6 months! 6 months!

      The company clearly had no idea what the job was worth, and your ability to step in and take over made them think it was worth much less than it really was. After you left, they found out how much it was worth when the hired someone. That person either cost what you were asking, or did a horrible job.

      Don't beat yourself up about it. There was nothing you could have done to keep the job except keep accepting their abuse.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    4. Re:what not to do by John_Sauter · · Score: 2, Informative

      The company clearly had no idea what the job was worth, and your ability to step in and take over made them think it was worth much less than it really was. After you left, they found out how much it was worth when they hired someone. That person either cost what you were asking, or did a horrible job.

      I dropped by a year after they let me go and learned it was the latter—my friends told me that the quality of service had declined. However, they did start obeying the part of the contract which provides that people who are given temporary extra responsibilities get a temporary bump in pay.

    5. Re:what not to do by geoskd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The company clearly had no idea what the job was worth, and your ability to step in and take over made them think it was worth much less than it really was. After you left, they found out how much it was worth when the hired someone. That person either cost what you were asking, or did a horrible job.

      Perhaps, but I would venture to state that in this economy, they probably got someone at the same basic skill level and pay level, and will never go back to the two person setup again. People don't understand truly yet, but the workload vs pay-rate balance has shifted, and it will *not* go back. the 40 Hours/week job from yesteryear payed what today's 60+ hour job pays, and yesterdays 60+ hour job now pay 3/4 what it used to. 10% of the American working class is unemployed, and despite everything you may have heard, and a trillion dollar bailout, this is unlikely to ever go back to the 2-3% we used to have. With all of those qualified people out there, and Obama putting hundreds of thousands more through higher education, the workforce surplus will continue into the foreseeable future. This has happened before: in the mid 90's, Japans economy weakened in a miniature collapse. Their unemployment rate doubled and more, and has never recovered in the 15 years since. France has been running almost double digit unemployment for 20 years. This collapse is not the direct result of the housing bubble as we were told. It is a fundamental shift in the world economy that has been happening over the last 50 years and has finally caught up with the USA. The housing bubble was just the trigger event that allowed companies to justify wholesale job elimination. Even when revenues come back, those jobs aren't. Long story short, that 60k per year job you had is now worth 40k on the open market. Those lucky enough to still have those high paying jobs, will find that once they leave them the high paying jobs will either suddenly become low paying jobs or will liquidate entirely. Even worse is the responsibility creep, we have been discussing all through this thread.

      -=Geoskd

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    6. Re:what not to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd venture to state that companies that believe they can do that are basically going to implode in the next few years. The cost (to an employee) of gaining that expertise hasn't gone down. Business is riding on diminishing reserves of an "IT employee pool" that is shrinking a lot faster than they realize. A lot of people who were in the field ten years ago have since moved on - and will NOT come back unless it's for more than they used to make and more than whatever they make in their new field now. A lot of people who might have gone into computers in the last ten years outright rejected the field since it was blatantly clear they weren't wanted or appreciated.

      The threat - and it IS a threat if you're using it to stiff your employees - of "in this economy" and "10% unemployment" doesn't work when that 10% aren't people who can do the same job as the people you have now. You can use that threat on untrained workers - grocery baggers, cleaning staff, whatever - but it doesn't work if you need people with a degree and a few years of relevant experience. (*Any* degree requirement, all by itself, automatically disqualifies 70-80% of the overall population, and probably a higher percent of the unemployed population). When you drive them to quit or you outright fire them, their equivalent-or-better replacement *is not there*. Thinking you can fire someone and instantly get an equal or better replacement for the same or less pay is something that barely even worked during the initial tech crash.

    7. Re:what not to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what H1-B visas are for, right? "Oh, we can't find a suitable employee at prevailing wages! Need to import some qualified people!"

    8. Re:what not to do by redscare2k4 · · Score: 1

      The moral of the story is to have something in your sleeve before applying pressure to your current company.

  70. Yep by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've seen some funny situations like this. Friend of mine was in a similar thing of they kept heaping on more work and refusing to raise his pay. They didn't lay him off, they just wouldn't pay him any more so he left. About 2 weeks later they were calling him, desperate. The new guy couldn't figure something out, the site was down, nothing was working, they were so screwed would he please, PLEASE come in and fix it? He literally laughed and said ok sure, for a couple grand up front. They said no, he hung up. They called him a few more times begging before finally, angrily, agreeing to pay a hefty consulting fee. He went in and fixed their problem and they tried to hand him a bunch more work and he said "Nope, see ya!"

    They went out of business around a year later, due to I'm sure many other bad decisions.

    It is silly to think employees will just take whatever you tell them to and should be happy for the privilege. No, the good ones will leave and will find other work. You can say "Well nobody is irreplaceable," and while that is a general global truth, it can be false in specific situations. You can find that someone you shuffle out was extremely important to your operation, and you cannot replace them in the time frame that is needed and for the price you can afford. As such part (or all) of your company may suffer performance wise or even fail.

    New people are not immediately 100% productive, it takes time to learn systems (the more specialized the longer) and finding good people can be hard. In particular if you need someone who is willing to hit the ground running immediately, do a ton of work, etc you are usually talking a consultant and an expensive one at that, or a consulting firm and several consultants. You can spend a year's salary in a few weeks easy depending on what you need.

    1. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are assuming that they wouldn't have gone out of business with your friend still working there. The fact that they were heaping more and more work on him; probably through firings and people quitting; without either considering hiring people or a pay raise, indicates that they were in trouble financially already.

    2. Re:Yep by toddestan · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, a lot companies are using the economic downturn as an excuse to try and squeeze as much as possible from their workforce, even when the company is still doing fine and said cutbacks aren't necessary.

  71. Well it is actually Xenapp... by Dharkfiber · · Score: 1

    If you don't know the actual name of the product you are actually not the one getting an of the work done. Maybe you are simply tracking hours and resources, and have an over blown sense of importance about the work you are doing. When I started in this field we had to at least be able to spell the products we were working with. Sorry to flame bait, but I have 'worked for' and with many people like yourself that we have simply put up wIth because management knows that technical resources that can actually move the football forward don't need to waste their time with (especially if the company is resource constrained) tracking fields on a Gantt chart.

  72. Play hardball by mikein08 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Old saying: if you have a broad back,there are a thousand people waiting to put a saddle on it. Start job hunting yesterday. Have some interviews, get some offers, go to your boss and tell him you will leave for a new job unless you get a decent raise and extra resources to do your job properly. Don't be nasty or demanding, just matter of fact. Remember, your company has NO loyalty to you, and you should have none to it. Your other option, if you don't mind being unemployed for awhile, is to go to your boss, politely tell him you want a raise and extra resources to do your job. If your request is denied, resign with 2 weeks notice immediately. If your boss then decides that you deserve the raise and resources, you could play some serious poker by increasing your demands. In other words, play hardball with these people. They will play it with you, so play it with them. Don't let them get the upper hand - ever. But you must be prepared to be fired or to resign and perhaps to be unemployed for a while. If you've got the financial resources, unemployment aint so bad! Good luck.

    1. Re:Play hardball by Krahar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or he could find work at a place actually worth working at. Might do wonders for his life expectancy.

    2. Re:Play hardball by Arimus · · Score: 1

      agree with that; left my old job after 7 years recently due to differences of opinion - till I'd left hadn't realised how much I'd started to hate going in - the only attraction with the group of people I worked with. Now I'm looking for a job and money is very tight I'm still happier without my old job.

      --
      --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
  73. Not to be taken too seriously, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...one option might be to patent a work process that you have trying to juggle all these new duties, and then subsequently sue them for infringement when they replace you and attempt to have the poor shmuck do the job you had using your patented processes. Employers that ABUSE their workers in this way (and it IS abuse, don't kid yourselves) generally have no qualms about using your hard work to pad their pockets at someone else's expense.

    Why should the media industry be the ONLY beneficiaries of a corrupted legal process?

  74. Ask for the title, not the money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given your description of the situation, you won't get the money and you know you won't. You'll probably be fired, either on the spot or on the long term if you try to force it through. Ask for the better title, it comes for free for your employer. Once the economy improves your title will get you either better pay at your current employer or a better shot to get good employment elsewhere.

  75. Some simple, but effective tactics by they_call_me_quag · · Score: 5, Informative

    (1)
    Every time your boss hands you some new responsibility ask him "which of my current responsibilities should I push to the bottom of my prioritized list so that I can take on this new responsibility?" Be persistent... he needs to provide an answer. Explain that you can only make a small number of tasks (1-3) your "top priority" and everything else will either get worked on sporadically or fall by the wayside entirely. Force him to prioritize... that's his job. Be sure to get this in writing (email).

    (2)
    Learn to tactfully say "no". I do this ALL THE TIME at my job. I explain that my primary duty is too important to the company for me to get distracted by some additional work. I simply refuse to be assigned the work. This only works if you are really good at your core duties and are not easily replaceable. It also help if you generate revenue. (Suck on that, developers).

    (3)
    Start looking RIGHT NOW for the job you really want. When you find it, drop this one like the stinking bag of shit it is. Life is too short to hate your job... you could get brain cancer next year and die within 18 months... why spend your time between now and then being miserable?

    1. Re:Some simple, but effective tactics by John_Sauter · · Score: 1

      (1) Every time your boss hands you some new responsibility ask him "which of my current responsibilities should I push to the bottom of my prioritized list so that I can take on this new responsibility?" Be persistent... he needs to provide an answer. Explain that you can only make a small number of tasks (1-3) your "top priority" and everything else will either get worked on sporadically or fall by the wayside entirely. Force him to prioritize... that's his job. Be sure to get this in writing (email).

      I used to work for Digital Equipment Corporation as a software engineer. Once when I arrived at a one-on-one meeting with my supervisor, the first words out of her mouth were “You cannot persuade me that adding a one-day task to your schedule lengthens your schedule by one day.” I was so astonished by this statement that I didn't know how to respond. I think I said something inane, like “OK, I won't try.”

      In my experience, management will usually either not provide an answer, and your persistence will be considered an annoyance, or they will provide a constantly-changing answer, which is, of course, as bad as no answer at all. The exceptional case (which I also experienced at DEC) is the manager who maintains a stable list of priorities for his people, and pushes back on his management when they try to jerk the department around. A good phrase to use when saying No is “That horse has already left the gate.”

    2. Re:Some simple, but effective tactics by Mspangler · · Score: 1

      "Every time your boss hands you some new responsibility ask him "which of my current responsibilities should I push to the bottom of my prioritized list so that I can take on this new responsibility?" Be persistent... he needs to provide an answer."

      I saw another version of this advice several years ago, and it has proven to be among the best tidbits I've run across. I have been working for two (or more) bosses for several years now. On occasion, I have to get both of them in the same office and launch them at each other. Bosses set the priorities, that is their job. Don't them weasel out of it. It has never taken more than a half an hour for the three of us to sort out the priorities. (Don't be bashful about beating them with the company mantra either, Safety, Quality, Production, in my case. Oh, you are willing to cut corners on quality to make the production rate? No problem, please repeat that while speaking clearly into the pen...) In other words, put it in writing, and then a hard copy of that email comes home with me to the Get Out of Jail Free Collection. They don't pay me nearly enough to be the Designated Felon, so I take care to not be exposed to that role.

      Be realistic too. (Why yes, I can do foo, it will increase costs 50 cents per kilogram.) (I work at a chemical plant.) "ACK!" they say, "Maybe we should reevaluate foo." And sometimes they gulp and say, "But we simply must have foo, go ahead with the plan." That is their call, so don't argue the point. For some reason they keep me far away from marketing, so there is no way I can know what the customers want other than what the bosses tell me.

      Boss Management is an integral part of your job. Give it the attention it deserves.

         

    3. Re:Some simple, but effective tactics by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      you could get brain cancer next year and die within 18 months

      Nevermind, I don't want the raise anymore.

    4. Re:Some simple, but effective tactics by they_call_me_quag · · Score: 2, Informative

      > I was so astonished by this statement that I didn't know how to respond

      And that was your first mistake. By agreeing to this ridiculous statement you lost all leverage.

      Some simple but effective ways of handling this:

      (1) Tell her, "Let's try this again... I am going to leave the room, wait a for 30 seconds and come back in." That gives you some time to come up with a better response than "OK, I won't try."

      (2) Pretend you never heard it.

      (3) Tell her, "In that case this meeting is over." Turn around and leave the meeting.

      (4) Ask her to put that opinion in writing. If you she won't put it in writing it means she's afraid of the repercussions from above.

      If nothing else, appease her but make an ally of her boss and her boss' boss. And look for a new job.

      Instead, you did nothing and you got everything you deserved. Sorry, but that's the truth of the matter.

    5. Re:Some simple, but effective tactics by John_Sauter · · Score: 1

      > I was so astonished by this statement that I didn't know how to respond

      And that was your first mistake. By agreeing to this ridiculous statement you lost all leverage.

      Some simple but effective ways of handling this:

      (1) Tell her, "Let's try this again... I am going to leave the room, wait a for 30 seconds and come back in." That gives you some time to come up with a better response than "OK, I won't try."

      (2) Pretend you never heard it.

      (3) Tell her, "In that case this meeting is over." Turn around and leave the meeting.

      (4) Ask her to put that opinion in writing. If you she won't put it in writing it means she's afraid of the repercussions from above.

      If nothing else, appease her but make an ally of her boss and her boss' boss. And look for a new job.

      Instead, you did nothing and you got everything you deserved. Sorry, but that's the truth of the matter.

      In effect, I followed your recommendation #2: after my stupid remark I ignored what she had said. I don't think trying to make an ally of her boss would have worked. He didn't like me, and I think she was maneuvering her position so that she would be seen as in his camp, rather than mine. He laid me off at his first opportunity.

  76. You can't. Just use this to add to your resume. by Sarusa · · Score: 1

    Unless you're lucky enough to have the dream boss, they are used to paying you $X and anything they pile on top is just part of what they perceive as part of your job. After all, it's just 40 hours a week, right? Even if it's not even 40 hours a week any more and the responsibilities are far more complex. You're trapped by perception.

    So just use this to add to your resume and go looking for a new job. Asking for a raise once you have a new job offer is always bad. Even if you get one the well is completely poisoned. You could ask for a raise before you go looking for a job, but you run the risk they'll terminate you on the spot. That's your call.

  77. already being there ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've worked for years in the ICT business, without getting serious compensation.

    I've felt the evolution of "love ICT" to "like ICT" to "work in ICT" to almost "hate to work in ICT" ...

    Maybe a good question is .. how to get rid of the stress, the burnout and the depression added to it?

    The best advice I can give in this; don't wait to long to jump ships when it gets ackward or you'll be the victim of it.

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  78. you're ... not a team player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In corporations, the concept of 'team player' is a one-way street. It ultimately means 'yes-man' or 'slave'.

  79. homophones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    plane != plain

  80. If his workload is this hight, he's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If his workload is this high, he's not replaceable. It's one reason why employers should see the sense in not overworking their employees: as soon as they retire/leave/break down they have to be replaced and the company WILL notice (if they don't then they didn't need to overload their employee and they'd still likely be working for them).

    So, no, he's not pretty replaceable.

    He's pretty replaceable by several others, but that is more expensive.

    Mind you, this could be a way to avoid paying him redundancy when they really want to get rid of him.

    1. Re:If his workload is this hight, he's not by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      If his workload is this high, he's not replaceable. It's one reason why employers should see the sense in not overworking their employees: as soon as they retire/leave/break down they have to be replaced and the company WILL notice

      They'll notice - but only after it's too late. Too late for the employee, for the company, and last but not least for the poor bastard who has to clean up the mess. But not too late for the PHB who made the cost cuts, got his bonus and moved on.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  81. And "do this or get fired" is too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And "do this or get fired" is too. And what was the first response to the question? "You're replaceable".

    How come that one isn't blackmail?

  82. Go in armed and ready by timmarhy · · Score: 0
    Voice your concerns in a very non alarmist way in and email to your manager. keep all emotion out of it. this way you have a record when he inevitably tells you there's no money for a pay rise.

    next, find another job that pays atleast as much. have their letter of offer in your hand when you waltz into your managers office. In the current job market this is the ONLY way you will get traction. very few company's will give you a raise just to be fair. they will dump as much on you as they can until you say no or leave.

    I had to do this at a few jobs, there's very little that stamping you feet will do in the way of convincing management that you are being under paid.

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  83. Jimbob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bite your lip and get on with it. Keep a diary/portfolio of things you do. You've a fantastic opportunity here. Technical writer does sound like anybody IT literate could do it... but you're being offered the chance to prove you can do more. And the more professional jobs will demand to see proof of your doing such before they employ you.

    So, when you've got a year of it under your belt, apply for a job you've now got demonstratable skills in.

    Don't worry about asking for a title change... on your cv, remove any header specifically saying "TITLE:" or "POSITION HELD:", and just put the most appropriate "title" for the job you're applying for, so long as you've been doing it for the past year. It may infer that it was your title at the company, but hey, if you've got proof in your portfolio that you can do it, and actually can, who cares!

    And then hey presto! More moolah, job satisfaction and a step up the ladder.

  84. I've taken jobs from these postings... by amcdiarmid · · Score: 1

    I even got a semi-decent salary: All I had to do was write a coherent letter de-constructing the duties described to job-roles... If the company is sticks to their guns on cheaping out - stay away.

    Dear Sirs, I am responding to your advertisement seeking a technical expert. Your ad lists 24 required and desired skills. These skills imply that the person you are seeking is an expert in Cisco Routers, Windows System administration, database administration, and AIX. These positions pay X,Y;Z respectively (link to last years pay report).

    If you are still reading at this point, your skill list looks like
    *numbered list of skills from advertisement

    I am able to do *whatver skills you are expert in* at an expert level, medium skills at a medium level, and the rest of that crap at a remote monkey level.

    As I would love to work for your shitty ass company, & I can do the job of X - may I suggest it may make more sense for your company to hire several people to fill these responsibilities? An individual who can do all the positions listed will cost (sum of average salaries linked above x2) and will both cost your company more & create a larger single point of resource failure.

    If you are interested in my services as an excellent (Whatever you think you would want to do at the company.)as part of an effecient IT team, please contact me at X

  85. Re:It's different Now for Corporations & Indiv by Klinky · · Score: 3, Funny

    Meanwhile he pockets the other 3%.

  86. you are the asshole that is preventing job growth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you are the asshole that is preventing job growth... THANKS!

    have you ever thought of saying, "I don't know how to do that?"

  87. HAHAHAHAAAAAAAAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hahahahaahaaaaaa! hahahahahahahahahahahaha! HA!! HAHAHAHAHAHA!

    No, but seriously, good luck with that.

  88. Just don't be a cock... by tyroneking · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1. Most bosses would rather drop an employee rather than give in to demands. This is management 101 and why we need unions. So do not threaten anything and don't stop doing work.
    2. Ask for training. It'll cost your boss and you'll learn something. But don't do it if you have to commit to a minimum contract term.
    3. When you have learnt enough from your new role (but before you learn too many bad habits) start looking for another job. Then leave. Don't stay at your current job - they may offer you more money to stop you leaving but they will always see it as betrayal and kick you later on.
    4. If your employer had any respect for you they would have automatically offered a promotion to you - they did not - so you should leave.

    1. Re:Just don't be a cock... by tomhath · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Very bad advice on all four points. Most managers are managers because they're good negotiators; they asked for promotions and convinced their own managers why a promotion is a good thing for both parties. It's perfectly reasonable for an an employee to ask for higher compensation or a promotion, but the employee also has to understand that from the company's perspective there's no reason to pay a person more than necessary to get the job done. Unions only provide a temporary and artificial shortage of labor which forces wages higher until the company can make other adjustments such as automation, offshoring, or leaving the market.

      That's not to say that there aren't toxic managers out there (I've seen a few), but they tend to run companies into the ground pretty quickly. A successful company will always be willing to work with good employees to maximize the benefit to both.

    2. Re:Just don't be a cock... by tyroneking · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Obviously I disagree with you entirely.

      Either his employer behave fairly and offers him the right compensation for the work they have asked him to do, or they behave unfairly and they do not.

      Employer-employee relationships should not be a free-market free-for-all.

    3. Re:Just don't be a cock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1. Most bosses would rather drop an employee rather than give in to demands. This is management 101 and why we need unions. So do not threaten anything and don't stop doing work.

      Hasn't been my experience. Both times I have asked for a raise and had another job offer, they did offer a raise. I accepted once without any backlash.

      2. Ask for training. It'll cost your boss and you'll learn something. But don't do it if you have to commit to a minimum contract term.

      He already learned how to perform his additional responsibilities. If you mean training for something he doesn't do yet, that would mean still more unpaid overtime, and for what?

      3. When you have learnt enough from your new role (but before you learn too many bad habits) start looking for another job. Then leave. Don't stay at your current job - they may offer you more money to stop you leaving but they will always see it as betrayal and kick you later on.

      If he can find a better job, I agree that might be good. The only thing is that his new job had better be with a stable employer.

      4. If your employer had any respect for you they would have automatically offered a promotion to you - they did not - so you should leave.

      Not necessarily. His skills aren't that uncommon. They might find someone who is willing to be overworked rather than unemployed. Agreed that won't be sustainable if the economy improves. But if the economy improves they might be more willing to give him a raise.

  89. roles and responsibilities not aligned by richman555 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to work at a company that used to tell me that 'they aren't about roles or titles'. You would have a title so generic and understated that honestly no one could figure out what you do. I was able to leave this job for a 25% salary increase because my responsibilities never matched my title. Companies use this as a ploy so that they do not have to pay you in many cases what you are worth.

  90. overpaid to begin with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sounds like it to me!

  91. Obey the First Law of Wingwalking... by tomhath · · Score: 1

    Which is: "Don't let go of what you got ahold of until you get ahold of something else with the other hand."

    Get another offer before even hinting that you want a raise. Then you're in a good negotiating position. Otherwise all you have is an empty threat to start looking, and you've clued them in to start looking for your replacement.

  92. Re:Learn to say "NO". Scale down your responsibili by Tanuki64 · · Score: 1

    Nope, I am freelancer. Seen enough companies where the most incompetent had the highest positions. This cannot be coincidence.

  93. Re:It's different Now for Corporations & Indiv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So individuals are doing more, often much much more for the same or less money. Grab a better position if you can, but it might be tough to get the next one. DO NOT do what a friend did and quit before securing the next position. Several of my Professional friends have been out for about 2 years now. I can't understand how they are surviving!

    They are probably on the government dole, like me. It's nice to sit back and let others pay my way. Fuck pride.

  94. Do what you want to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You said you would prefer to keep writing and marketing - so tell your company that. You need more money to do the job they have asked you to do and you dont want to do it without more money. Chances are if you ask for more money they will just replace you - you are not being asked to do anything specialist at all and everyone on Slashdot would likely be able to do what you are doing now in the IT side. For that reason you need to move back to what your company needs you most for, which is content, and stick at the same level of pay you are on now.

    If you company is already laying people off then they dont have too much money floating around. If you ask for more, they might give it, or they might replace you.

    So do what you want to do: write and market, and keep your wage the same, because thats stable and makes you slightly less easy to replace.

  95. Still need a resume to get pass HR by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Still need a resume to get pass HR and all the other BS that blocks you from getting to real tech people at some jobs.

  96. Move on is the only way by coldtone · · Score: 1

    Forgive me if I sound biter. I was once like you. Here is my story and I hope it helps.

    I have always been a fast learner, and have always been able to take on greater and greater responsibilities at companies. My employers have always loved me. But raises where always very hard to get (if ever) and I was always paid below what I knew I was worth.

    The only way I was able to get what I wanted was to move to other companies, and eventually to contract development.

  97. One in a million shot by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    You might get a raise if you ask for more money, but on the odd chance that you get it, three things will happen:

    1) They will feel that they are paying you appropriately for the 70h/wk you're working, even if they give you a very small raise
    2) Whatever this raise is, you may consider it an advance on your next [n] raises. In other words, in two to five years, you will be back to what you would have made if you'd never gotten this raise in the first place.
    3) They will likely start looking for someone less bothersome to fill your position, especially after the launch when they don't need the massive support hours, and you're now getting paid "too much" for the reduced effort, 50 hour weeks you'll have.

    Again, there's a one in a million shot (okay, maybe one in 1,000) that you'll get a title, a pay bump, and if things pick up a new staff below you and you'll be headed for an ownership position or at least toward a spot in the senior staff. IMHO, I would make sure that you're in the market before you make the play.

    FWIW, if you're really good, it's worth floating your resume on all the major employment boards. Many HR teams troll them to see if their employees are looking around. They may bring up the conversation first, at which point, you can simply state your concerns about the additional work. They may come around.

    I know people for whom this has happened: a cousin was contacted by a headhunter, and ended up with a 25% raise - completely unsolicited, my brother in law was disappointed with the organization and lack of expertise in his dept, he floated his CV on monster and his dept head called him the next day. He was honest that they didn't have the expertise to perform their mission, and had good examples. They made him the group leader, moved staff to another area, and let him re-start the group.

    Now, I'm going to lend a cautionary tale to this. I've had several employees over the years. Some have been disappointed with raises and/or salary offers. With two exceptions, I would have happily let them find other jobs. I have found that the top 5-8% of employees are truly independent. The next 30% are useful if carefully watched and managed. The rest do nothing more than provide CO2 to the plants and add heat to the building in the winter. Remember that, in the world of business, you are worth about 1/2 of the revenue you can GUARANTEE to produce EVERY YEAR (if you're in marketing or management, that drops to at most 5%, or half of a 10% "commission"). The rest of the revenue gets eaten up by G&A, mkt, overhead, taxes, and profit. If the last one in line - profit - doesn't stay significantly positive, then nothing else matters. Business isn't a jobs program. Personally, I give out bonuses twice a year based on production and profit. I'm too small to guarantee large fixed salaries.

     

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  98. Free advice from a business owner by salesgeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm used to being on the other side of the table. Here are a couple of things people need to understand:

    I may be paying you all I can. In which case, there are all kinds of non-monetary things on the table. Days off, vacation, title, etc...

    I'm going to ask you what I'd like you to do, and expect you to tell me what you need to do it. More money, someone to take over task X, etc... Tell me. Whatever I'm asking you to take over is probably as important or more important than task X.

    Asking for more money isn't a firing level offense by itself. Lots of posts say asking for more money will get you fired. Not true. What will is asking for money and then telling coworkers, acting like you are on a one man strike, or not getting your job done to your usual level. Everyone wants more money. Management gets that. Asking for more money, then copping an attitude doesn't work.

    Understand your golden handcuffs -- there's a reason business owners spring for health insurance, options, 401Ks with vesting, etc... If you have benefits that are worth more than your pay (i.e. wife with cancer on company health care or ownership options), don't be shocked when that is pointed out to you... and be very scared if you are not reminded. I had one guy with $28,000 in 401K matching up in six months tell me he'd quite if he didn't get the raise. Remember, sometimes you are worth more fired.

    --
    -- $G
  99. I just dealt with this by dave562 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The most elegant approach that I was able to devise was to ask for a new title and job description to reflect all of the new responsibilities. In my case the IT department was reduced by 50% and I absorbed a lot of my previous boss' responsibilities, in addition to responsibilities from other departments. By taking the initiative to ask for those things I let the HR department know that I knew I was doing a lot more than was in my job description, and I wasn't being officially recognized for it. HR departments are notoriously ambivalent about changing job titles because doing so is a tacit acknowledgement that the position needs to be compensated the market rate for whatever the job title is.

    I believe that asking for a job title change is the most subtle, "safe" way to bring up the disparity of your situation with the rest of the organization. By doing that you get to ask what is probably really on your mind.. "Are you going to pay me what I'm really worth?" If they flat out deny you even a title change, you know you're completely replaceable, or at least HR believes you are. If you get a title change and new job description you are in a better position to ask for a raise next year to reflect your increased responsibilities, and your proven track record of meeting them. In my case, I was given a raise along with the title change.

    If money is really important to you and you get a title change but no raise, the new title puts you in a better position to find a new job. When I was sorting things out with my company I put my resume online just in case. Despite deciding to stay put where I am, I still get calls from recruiters a couple of times a month. I highly suggest posting your resume on an appropriate forum and responding to a couple of job postings. Figure out for yourself whether or not the market has any interest in you. The odds are that if you are competent enough to pick up the slack of a down sizing, you are worth significantly more than you're currently making. I've had good luck with Dice.com.

  100. Entry level jobs suck for a reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You desperately need a job - the $38K sounds great when compared to an hourly wage. You'll do just about anything to get it, and you ultimately have no idea just how it will be once you get inside.

    Pay the dues that entitle you to another $20K move on, with pride.

  101. They're goading you to quit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While you don't cave in, you work "for free". When you do cave in, they're rid of you. Someone's nephew is probably lined up already. Plus someone else to do the real work.

    How can you do that much work with any Q at all, anyway? Mostly supervising condensed reports?

  102. Resume Opportunity by mcferguson · · Score: 1

    Build your resume (hopefully with a focus on what you want to be doing long term), and dump your current employer once you get a better opportunity. And you will, if you focus on the right business / IT combination. The economy will eventually get better. And besides, it will take you a lot longer to realize your true potential in earnings if you stay with the same company.

  103. are narwhals real? by db10 · · Score: 1

    Just bank your experience, maybe have them just change your title to reflect your new role. The experience in your new role will pay off far more than a small raise now.

  104. Say what? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    I was originally hired as an Online Content Producer to write articles for a company website as well as start up the company's social media outlets on Facebook and Twitter.

    You call that a job?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  105. Your life is more important than your job by FarmerGeoff · · Score: 1

    Decide what you want to do with your life. Update your resume accordingly. Start the search for your new job. In the meanwhile, keep your head down, assuming you need to be employed. Your present employer is not worth a tinker's dam, or they would at least be improving your compensation. When you eventually submit your resignation, if they throw money at you, smile politely and leave.

    good luck.

  106. Find another job and quit. by trout007 · · Score: 1

    Or if you have enough saved quit right now. I've never been fired. I quit 4 jobs in my career and every time during my exit interview they asked why I was leaving and I told them it was because of money. Of course it was a bunch of the usual things like everyone here complains about but in fact it's always money. If they offered me a million bucks I would have put up with their crap. Then they always ask if there is anything they could do to keep me. I told them no. They would always ask what the offer was and I would be honest and tell them. They always said they would match it and some said they could beat it. I told them no because I didn't have to threaten the new employer with leaving just to get a raise and obviously you think I'm worth the new offer which means you know you were underpaying me to begin with and I don't want to work for a company like that.

    The point is you have to leave. If you threaten to leave just to get a raise you will be labeled as a troublemaker and someone to get rid of at the first opportunity. Also you now know what kind of people they are and how could you work for them?

    --
    I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
  107. Been there, done that by taustin · · Score: 1

    I had exactly this happen. In the space of about two years, I went from doing phone support for Windows users and running a small LAN in the office to running (and building, from scratch) a multi-state VPN based WAN running mission critical functions (like cash registers). I was prepared, and it went smoothly. So smoothly, nobody noticed how difficult a task it was. Came annual review time, and I got a cost of living raise. I looked my boss right in the eye and told him, in no uncertain terms, that I deserved more, and why, and that I'd be updating my resume if I didn't get more. A few weeks later, I got more, the biggest percentage raise in the company's history.

    Some important points:

    Remain calm, polite and professional.

    Explain your position in an objective manner, as in, "this is what I was hired for, and these are the specific duties that have been added since then."

    Refer to any past performance reviews that have been positive, especially ones that reference the new, added duties.

    And most important of all, and I cannot overemphasize this:

    WORK FOR REASONABLE PEOPLE.

    If you are concerned that your employer will respond negatively to you asking for a raise in a reasonable manner, with objective evidence to support your deserving it, you are probably right. And that means you are not working for reasonable people. And reasonable people will not take care of you.

    Loyalty is a two way street, always. If it does not go in both directions, it's not loyalty, it's subsevience.

  108. MAN THE HECK UP!!! by SoVi3t · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I would bring it to their attention the workload increase you've recieved. That isn't just a couple of things thrown on you here and there. You've been given a ton of new responsibilities, and they've definitely changed what you were initially hired to do. At the very LEAST, you should be asking for a raise. I would likely ask for an assistant and a new title as well. Good luck to them to get somebody to instantly replace you and learn all that is needed in the timeframe they so obviously are looking at.

    --
    Defender of Microsoft and Communism!!!
  109. Easy one.. by SuperCharlie · · Score: 1

    Stop being so competent. They probably won't give you a raise, might give you a new title, but assuredly will continue to pile on work until you stop doing it so well. Blow a few deadlines and hose a couple servers. If that doesn't help, get sick for a while.. gotta be careful and stay just useful enough not to get fired, but dam man.. keep it up and you will be the whipping boy for every management brainfart until you crumble. Be careful about scattering resume's.. when that gets upwind its all downhill... especially in a company who appears to believe you're bought in. Stop The Insanity and take it a little easier.. seriously..

  110. Ask for Equity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they don't have enough money to pay what your work is worth, and if you believe the company will be successful, then ask for some sort of equity. That costs them little now and pays you if they do suceed. If you don't think they will, then you should already be looking for a job elsewhere anyway.

  111. You, dude are already screwed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just bend over and ask, "please use some KY Jelly, Sir".

  112. Titles are Meaningless by bobsledbob · · Score: 1

    It sounds like you are working for a relatively small company? If so, a little education is in order...

    In general, when a company hires you, they are hiring _you_, not for the skills of the day, but for your potential in the future and your ability to extend into new roles. As an employee of a small firm, you are expected to wear different hats, grow with the job, be flexible, and fill in holes where they need to be filled.

    You sadly view yourself, instead, as a commodity, a replaceable set of skills; a robot. Your company was hoping that they had hired an all-around joe who was able to handle multiple new responsibilities as they came up. Instead of firing you, they let go some other poor slobs, which should bolster your confidence that they like you and want to trust in your talents.

    No employer is perfect when opening a new position, and the business landscape always changes. You should never expect to be doing the exact same tasks in which you were hired for. And if you do, you probably need to work for a large business or the government which can help you in your endeavor to be plugged in mindlessly to the cog.

    Your employer has obviously made some tough decisions and now needs you to perform some other duties. How exactly does that necessitate a pay raise, or a new title? Just do the work that is asked of you. You do their work, you collect a paycheck. It's really that simple. Titles are stupid and meaningless. Your new set of responsibilities does not imply a pay raise.

    So, work hard for your pay. Become irreplaceable. Grow in your talents. Demonstrate your continued loyalty and support of your company and its managers. And if the company is any good and values your contributions, you will be rewarded appropriately.

    And if you can't do this, you can't get over taking on new responsibilities while not getting a new title or some additional pay, then good luck selling your set of wares to the next poor schlub that might decide to hire you.

    From my experience, the best jobs are the ones _without_ titles. What exactly again does a title give you? Prove your worth, and a pay raise (and more) may very well come your way.

    --
    Beware of geeks bearing formulas.
  113. And by mahadiga · · Score: 1

    The easiest way to get better pay is hopping jobs regularly.
    And the additional advantage is you'll get diverse skills.

    --
    I'd like to buy homeland for our 10 million people. http://twitter.com/mahadiga
  114. Greatest quote I ever heard on the subject by MillerHighLife21 · · Score: 1

    "You'll never make what you're worth working for somebody else."

    That's from the wealthiest person I know who is a huge donor to a local university. And he's right.

    It really doesn't matter how much stuff you know. The person that runs business X needs somebody who can do task Y and task Y has a specific value to business X. Period. If you can do more, good for you. It doesn't mean that they're going to pay you anymore.

    Say you're the single greatest web programmer ever and you work for a company that makes websites for it's customers. In that company, you should be getting a portion of the money you're helping to rake in. You take your identical skill set to a telecom company and you will be paid somewhere in the budget range they've got allocated to the position, based on your experience.

    Simple as that. Identical skill sets have different value to different people. Many business people just view you as "the web guy" if you're doing anything related to the web and as far as they're concerned you are being paid the acceptable rate for your time already. It's not a business where you can set different prices for different tasks.

    You're being paid for your time per week. If they ask you to do something different with that time, there is not going to be a bit of difference in their mind. If you're doing web content, web design, or web programming you are going to be "the web guy" and assumed to do all of them. If somebody asks the janitor to build a website, the janitor will say "I don't know how."

    If you'd like to be paid proportionally, per task type then start a business. The flip side to being able to set your own price as you perceive it's value is that you have to accumulate enough of a client base and reputation that people are willing to pay those rates consistently enough to pay your bills.

    I've got my own business now and I used to feel undervalued, significantly, where I worked. Now, I would damn near kill for a steady paycheck. The ups and downs will kill you. What it has done though, is give me a dramatically greater appreciation for people who are able to provide jobs in the first place.

    Are you working 100% of the time when you're on the job? Are you spending any time on slashdot/facebook/some other site?

    Well, your employer was paying for every ounce of that time that you weren't really doing what you're paid to do. If you factor in your downtime + what you feel like you should be paid during your up time, it might just be a wash.

    --
    "Don't teach a man to fish, feed yourself. He's a grown man. Fishing's not that hard." - Ron Swanson
  115. use the skills to get a new job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The economy is bad now, so learn as much as you can and update your resume. Talk about all the responsibility you have. When the economy picks up, leave.

    going back to your company for more money does not work. Going back in a bad economy is more likely to get you fired.;

  116. Try going flat-rate pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It may be a gentler way to get a raise: one hour worked = one hour paid, all at a single flat rate.

    Since you work 80h weeks, you are looking at a doubling of you salary. At best, you get $$; at worst, they hire a second guy and you get your life back. All you have to give in exchange is the overtime fees.

  117. I.T. by bikermagi · · Score: 1

    Several years back I posted an article on LockerGnome. Entitled "What is your definition of an I. T. Professional," I think it is highly relevant to this discussion. I.T. is a new profession in the history of the world, and in it's definition, not unlike legal, religion, accounting, even medical (if you want to argue the value of human life, try getting free medical treatment). I've worked for lawyers, doctors, accountants, and even clergy, and although I might not want to be associated with any of them, I feel I. T. professionals deserve recognition AS professionals. I. T. people make companies run, they create and run the systems that generate revenue, while the antiquated business people take credit. Without the I. T. people, the business people would be doing business on paper. That article is here: http://www.lockergnome.com/it/2007/08/06/what-is-your-definition-of-an-it-professional/ But business doesn't want this. They want to keep the I. T. people down. They think all we do is type, and I've actually heard, "Can't you type faster?" Obviously that person was so inadequate as to even understand the depth of out knowledge or what we really do. They think we are just the geeks that they belittled in school, and we kept laughing and saying it's OK. It is in fact business that is antiquated. Take meetings for example. Meetings are a throwback to days before telephones, when business HAD to call people together to disseminate and gather information. That they still cling to this is simple proof of their obsolescence. Getting back to the topic at hand, and that is, "What to do when responsibilities spiral," the answer to that will come when I. T. is recognized as a profession. I took a job as a programmer, and ended up being Network Admin and Webmaster and even computer-builder. Yes, I should have been paid more. Another way we get conned into more responsibilities is when we are asked to give of our personal lives. If an I. T. person carries a pager and thus cannot be free to live their life, cannot have drinks at dinner for fear of being paged, well that I. T. person should be paid for all his time, THE SAME WAY that a lawyer would demand a retainer for merely being available. We need the lawyers to do their job and PROSECUTE those responsible when companies LIE TO CONGRESS and ask for more H1B visas when so many I. T. People are out of work. Limit the number of people in the field and the value will return. I'd like to say we need a national union but ... well, there actually is a limit to the flames I wish to create.

  118. Go for it! by liquidsgi · · Score: 1

    I think with this economy, some people jump to the quick and easy response "Just be glad you have a job and shut up." I have been through multiple layoffs during this recession and my take is some companies are using the recession as an excuse. They use it as an excuse to overwork people, to not take care of HR issues when they need to, not give raises (even cost of living) and other general crappiness that they can get away with. Obviously, you are not being treated right. They probably said to themselves "Yeah this guy is bright and can multitask so lets get rid of everyone and make him do all the work!" Cost-savings of $$$$. You won't get fired for asking for a raise. Go in there with a complete list of the things that you do/are responsible for and see what they say. If they say F**%% off, then you know to start looking. The economy is getting better and if you leave, they are going to be screwed. If they are stupid enough to not give you anything, they deserve what they get.

  119. Change all the pw's by xmvince · · Score: 1

    Change all the pw's and hold the network hostage. If they don't give you a raise, rm -r *

  120. In many countries ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .... that would be construed as unfair dismisal and your employer would have been liable.

    1. Re:In many countries ..... by John_Sauter · · Score: 1

      .... that would be construed as unfair dismisal and your employer would have been liable.

      As it turns out, it was, and they were.

  121. Play it big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go for a new job title, work to prove you're the right guy in charge (employers like to know they can count on key people to take care of things), and after a while go for a medium rise. Don't ask for more resources until you're absolutely sure that a new resource will have enough workload to be allocated full-time (without giving away from your workload). Try to figure out what kind of guy should the new resource be in order to be able to take care of things the same way you do (you will need to get involved into recruiting, because you will be directly responsible if the new guy screws up). Also keep in mind that a new guy hired means lots of costs, so the move must somehow turn to be profitable for the company (not just costly). Next step is to try to figure out a context for extending your newly founded team with 1-2 more guys (there must be proven opportunity of profitability in order to accomplish this). Once you have about 3 guys on your team, and loads of things that you and your guys take care of, then you're set for the real rise (the Rise).

  122. roby by roby2358 · · Score: 1

    All the above advice is great, but the short version is this: your employers are either idiots or abusers. Get out. In my experience, it is very, very rarely in your best interest to do a job you don't want to do, for too little money. At least for more than a few months. If the job responsibilities are shifting, then the organization really needs to hire someone who wants those responsibilities. And if they can't hire such a person, and are trying to save money by manipulating you into doing the work, then they are taking advantage of you. So keep your good attitude, but ya I agree with others who said it's time to start looking elsewhere before the environment becomes more abusive than it is now.

  123. 3 parents by DedTV · · Score: 1

    And did I mention how much I love my parents for ensuring I don't ever have to deal with that crap again? Typing all that out makes me remember just how miserable that whole scene was.
    I've been doing short term temp work to keep myself occupied (Fast fact: Spend more than a month at home at a time with nothing to do, and you will start hating your wife and kids). A few weeks ago I spent 3 days sanding off the little plastic pieces left on plastic forks when they leave the extruder. Grunt work is so much less stressful than corporate bullshit. And it's possible to make decent money doing mindless labor. Awhile back I had a temp job at a food manufacturing plant for a month spraying down their machines to eliminate allergens and was getting paid $14/hr. Full employees were making $18/hr. with a full benefits package.

    So there's another good tip for possibly increasing your job satisfaction. Move somewhere with a low cost of living (here in NE Oklahoma you can get a new, mid range 1800sq ft, 4BR 2Bath house for $175k) Get a job doing grunt work and get the hell out of the office.

  124. Just curious ... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    Looking at the +5 insightfuls I have to wonder ...

    How many of you are +5 unemployed because you did what you're telling this guy to do?

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  125. This company sucks by AthleteMusicianNerd · · Score: 1

    Shitty employees are willing to work for shitty companies. If you are good(which it sounds like you're better than everyone they let go), find a decent company to work for. They do exist. They are few and far between though, just like great employees are.

  126. What do you mean "back" there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm there already.

  127. Re:Learn to say "NO". Scale down your responsibili by Jenming · · Score: 1

    your mom is a whore

    --
    Morpheus, God of Dreams.
  128. be content by merockstar · · Score: 1

    Your life has afforded you the intelligence and resources to get a college education, and a job that pays more than ten grand a year.

    What I'm about to say is harder in practice than in theory, but it's the truth.

    Don't take your situation for granted. You have to step outside your self and look at the situation objectively. Your life kicks ass, sir.

    It's not going to hurt to print out a few resumes and float them around, since you're obviously being taken advantage of, but from where I'm sitting, I want taken advantage of... badly.